250827.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, August 27, 2025, Vol. 29, No. 238

                            Headlines

1021-1025 SANTA FE: Case Summary & Six Unsecured Creditors
17323 106 AVE: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in New York
176 W. 86 ST.: Hires Charles Wertman as Legal Counsel
301 W NORTH: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to Jan. 31, 2026
A.E. SCHLUETER: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to November 12

AB & J JEWELRY: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
ABILENE CONVENTION: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Rating on Sr. Revenue Bonds
ADVENT TECHNOLOGIES: Fisal Q2 Net Loss Narrows to $3.8 Million
AGREETA SOLUTIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
AIR CANADA: Moody's Affirms 'Ba2' CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable

ALEON METALS: Court Poised to Approve September 29 Auction
ALL PHASE: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
ALMITAS LATINAS: Melissa Haselden Named Subchapter V Trustee
ALPHA WOLF: Case Summary & One Unsecured Creditor
AMERICAN FORKLIFT: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to Sept. 23

AMPLIFYBIO LLC: Hires Epiq Corporate as Administrative Advisor
ANNALEE DOLLS: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to November 6
ANNALEE DOLLS: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral Until Sept 30
APOLLO CONSTRUCTION: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: Frank J. D'Amico Represents Creditors

ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: Insurers Oppose Ch. 11 Test Cases
ASOCIACION HOSPITAL: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
ASSURE AFFORDABLE: Hires Maxwell Dunn as Legal Counsel
AVON PRODUCTS: Needs to Revise Certain Provisions of Ch. 11 Plan
BEAR'S FRUIT: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in New York

BETTER IS BETTER: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
BEYOND AIR: Reports $8.1M Net Loss in Quarter Ended June 30, 2025
BINYAN KOIDESH: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
BIOXCEL THERAPEUTICS: Fiscal Q2 Net Loss Widens to $19.2 Million
BISHOP OF FRESNO: Committee Gets OK to Tap Stinson LLP as Counsel

BLOCK COMMUNICATIONS: Moody's Cuts CFR to B3 & 1st Lien Debt to Ba3
BOTTOMS UP: Lawrence Katz Named Subchapter V Trustee
BP RETAIL: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
C & S MEMORIAL: Armistead Long Named Subchapter V Trustee
CAMBRIDGE RIVERVIEW: Principal Loses Bid to Recover Unused Retainer

CAPTURE COLLECTIVE: Hires Kurt Kawafuchi as Special Counsel
CCA CONSTRUCTION: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to December 17
CHEZ JOEY: Lawrence Katz Named Subchapter V Trustee
CLAIRE'S HOLDINGS: Pachulski Stang Represents Elliott and Monarch
CLB TRUCKING: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral

COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Virginia
CONGOLEUM CORP: Court Says BIW Not Liable for Environmental Claims
CRANE ENTERPRISES: Court Upholds Cranes' Eviction
CROSS TOWN: Gets Court OK to Use Cash Collateral Until Feb. 28
CUSTOM CONCRETE: Unsecureds Will Get 10% of Claims over 5 Years

DATAVAULT AI: EOS Technology and CEO Bradley Hold 9.9% Stake
DEDICATION & EVERLASTING: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
DENVER BOULDERING: May Assume Lease with NR Denver Industrial
DESTINATIONS TO RECOVERY: No Patient Care Concern, PCO Report Says
EDWARDS BODY: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida

FULLER'S SERVICE: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
GENESIS HEALTHCARE: Court Orders Addition of New Committee Members
GLOBAL CHOICE: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in New York
GLOBAL CONSULTING: Hires Keery McCue PLLC as Legal Counsel
GR FOUNDER: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in New Jersey

GRAHAM PACKAGING: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos., Affirms 'B' ICR
GUARDIAN HEALTHCARE: PCO Reports Resident Care Complaints
GWG HOLDINGS: Wind-Down Trustee Resists Ethics Scandal Ouster Bid
HANESBRANDS INC: Gildan Transaction No Impact on Moody's 'B1' CFR
HONOR STUDIOS: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Texas

HOUSE SPIRITS: Seeks Additional $500,000 DIP Loan
ICORECONNECT INC: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
II BALLAKIS FAMILY: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in New York
IMPERIAL MANUFACTURING: Case Summary & Three Unsecured Creditors
IVESTER'S TREE: Unsecured Creditors to Split $80K over 4 Years

JACKSBOSTON LLC: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
JACKSON HOSPITAL: PCO Reports No Staffing Shortages
JHRG MANUFACTURING: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
JOSHUA MANAGEMENT: Gets OK to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 15
JT MASONRY: Case Summary & One Unsecured Creditor

KESKIN INC: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
KINGS ESTATES: To Sell Philadelphia Property to Martin Rembert
KULA GRAIN: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to September 19
L & D CAFE: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
LA CREME: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in California

LARCO POOLS: Hires Ford & Semach P.A. as Bankruptcy Counsel
LEGACY DRAYAGE: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
LIFESCAN GLOBAL: Seeks to Hire Porter Hedges as Co-Counsel
LITTLE MINT: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to October 27
MARTINES PALMEIRO: Hires Kutner Brinen Dickey as Legal Counsel

MCMILLAN LOGGING: Case Summary & 13 Unsecured Creditors
MENORAH CAMPUS: No Resident Concern, 2nd PCO Report Says
MERIT STREET: Committee Taps Berkeley Research as Financial Advisor
MERIT STREET: Committee Taps O'Melveny & Myers as Counsel
MODIVCARE INC: Delays Q2 10-Q for Goodwill Review, Culture Probe

MOUNTAIN VIEW: Hires Condon Tobin as Legal Counsel
NAPA FORD: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
NB MOUNTAIN: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
NEAL MEATS: Case Summary & Two Unsecured Creditors
NIKOPAT & ASSOCIATES: Hires Sold 100 as Real Estate Broker

NORTH WHITEVILLE: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
NORTHVOLT AB: Lyten to Secure Carmaker Support for Co's Revival
OMEGA INVESTIGATION: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Puerto Rico
OREGON CLEAN: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB', Outlook Stable
ORIGIN FOOD: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral

PARTY CITY: Reaches Nearly $4MM Settlement w/ Former Employees
PIONEER HEALTH: Opposes Investment Banker's $500K Fee Request
POSH QUARTERS: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
PRIMO BRANDS: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Pos.
PROSPECT MEDICAL: Mayor Wants Non-Profit Buyer for Waterbury

PUERTO RICO: Board Shake-Up May Not Bring PREPA Bond Payments
QUILL 115: Section 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on September 24
RECONNECT INC: Section 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on September 24
RECONNECT INCORPORATED: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
RHODE ISLAND MAYORAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg, Affirms 'BB+' ICR

RITE AID: Co., Lease Buyer Slam Sale Objection of Landlord
RS BORGES INVESTMENTS: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida
SABRE INDUSTRIES: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
SAMYS OC: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to Sept. 30
SBHC HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CC' on Planned Debt Exchange

SCIENTIFIC ENERGY: Needs More Time to Finalize Q2 10-Q Statements
SERENITY TENDER: Section 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Sept. 23
SIFAT LLC: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to December 1
SK INDUSTRIES: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to October 16
SMITH ENVIRONMENTAL: Gets Court OK to Tap Messari as Accountant

SPIRIT AIRLINES: Works w/ Advisers to Explore 2nd Chap. 11 Filing
ST VINCENT HOME: Case Summary & Three Unsecured Creditors
STORMS FAMILY: Hires Sue D. Lasky PA as Legal Counsel
SUNNY ENERGY: Trustee Taps ERC to Assist in Retention Credits
TARGET GROUP: Posts $220K Net Loss, Lower Revenue in Fiscal Q2

THERAPEUTICS MD: Swings to $551,000 Profit in Fiscal Q2
TINY FROG: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral
TITAN CNG: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Delaware
TROYZ TOWING: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida
UPHEALTH HOLDINGS: Reaches Chapter 11 Agreement With Glocal

VIEWBIX INC: MMCAP International and MM Asset Holds 1.75% Stake
VOYAGE ACADEMY: Moody's Assigns Ba1 Rating to 2025A/B Revenue Bonds
WATERBRIDGE NDB: S&P Places 'B' ICR on Watch Pos on Merger With WBR
WATERBRIDGE OPERATING: S&P Places 'B-' ICR on Watch Positive
WEST PROPERTIES: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Sept. 19

WOLFSPEED INC: Seeks to Sell Macom Shares in Private Sale
WOLFSPEED INC: US Trustee Opposes Chapter 11 Plan Opt-Outs
WPB HOLDINGS: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
XTREME QUALITY: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida
[] Suppliers Struggle Amid Expensive Bankruptcy Cases


                            *********

1021-1025 SANTA FE: Case Summary & Six Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 1021-1025 Santa Fe Avenue, LLC
        135 North Hamilton Drive
        Beverly Hills, CA 90211

Business Description: 1021-1025 Santa Fe Avenue, LLC lists its
                      principal assets at 1021-1025 Santa Fe
                      Avenue in Los Angeles, California 90021-
                      1740.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 25-17398

Debtor's Counsel: Raymond H. Aver, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND H. AVER, A PROFESSIONAL
                  CORPORATION
                  11849 West Olympic Boulevard, Suite 204
                  Los Angeles, CA 90064  
                  Tel: (310) 571-3511
                  E-mail: ray@averlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: 1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Farid E. Kahen as manager.

A copy of the Debtor's list of six unsecured creditors is available
for free on PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/67RXQYI/1021-1025_Santa_Fe_Avenue_LLC__cacbke-25-17398__0002.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/6QWCWNA/1021-1025_Santa_Fe_Avenue_LLC__cacbke-25-17398__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


17323 106 AVE: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in New York
------------------------------------------------------
On August 18, 2025, 17323 106 Ave LLC filed Chapter 11 protection
in the Eastern District of New York. According to court filing,
the Debtor reports between $500,000 and $1 million in debt owed to
1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.

         About 17323 106 Ave LLC

17323 106 Ave LLC is a single asset real estate company based in
Jamaica, New York.

17323 106 Ave LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.Case No. 25-43963) on August 18,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets between
$100,000 and $500,000 and estimated liabilities between $500,000
and $1 million.


176 W. 86 ST.: Hires Charles Wertman as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
176 W. 86 St. Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York to hire Charles Wertman of
the Law Offices of Charles Wertman P.C. to serve as its legal
counsel.

Mr. Wertman will provide these services:

   (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers and
duties as debtor-in-possession in accordance with the provisions of
the Bankruptcy Code;

   (b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary schedules,
applications, motions, answers, orders, reports, adversary
proceedings and other legal documents required by the Bankruptcy
Code and Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure;

   (c) assist the Debtor in the development and implementation of a
plan of reorganization; and

   (d) perform all other legal services for the Debtor that may be
necessary in connection with this Chapter 11 case and the Debtor's
attempts to reorganize its affairs under the Bankruptcy Code.

Prior to the filing, the Law Offices of Charles Wertman P.C. was
paid $8,738, of which $1,738 was the filing fee required by the
Court. The remaining balance was provided as a retainer to serve as
Debtor's counsel.

The Law Offices of Charles Wertman P.C. is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code,
according to court filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   Charles Wertman, Esq.
   LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES WERTMAN P.C.
   100 Merrick Road, Suite 304W
   Rockville Centre, NY 11570
   Telephone: (516) 284-0900
   E-mail: charles@cwertmanlaw.com

                           About 176 W. 86 St. Corp.

176 W. 86 St. Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 25-10691) on April 9,
2025.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of
between $0 and $50,000 and liabilities of between $1,000,001 and
$10 million.

Judge Philip Bentley oversees the case.

Law Offices of Charles Wertman P.C. is Debtor's legal counsel.


301 W NORTH: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to Jan. 31, 2026
--------------------------------------------------------------
301 W North Avenue, LLC, asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois to extend its exclusivity periods to
file a plan of reorganization and obtain acceptance thereof to
January 31, 2026, respectively.

In this case, cause exists to extend the exclusivity periods,
because the relevant factors weigh in favor of extension.

     * Factor 1: Necessity of Time to Negotiate and Obtain Adequate
Information. The Debtor requires additional time to finalize a
settlement with its primary secured mortgage lender with the goal
of confirming a consensual plan of reorganization. If the parties
can agree to treatment under the plan, the Debtor is in a unique
position to maximize the value of its estate for all of the various
stakeholders. This first factor weighs in favor of an extension.

     * Factor 2: Good Faith Progress Toward Reorganization. The
Debtor has made good faith progress toward reorganization. The
Debtor has already filed a Disclosure Statement and a confirmable
Plan and has made good faith efforts to reach a consensual plan
with its main secured mortgage lender and other creditors. This
second factor also supports granting the Debtor an extension.

     * Factor 3: Paying Debts as They Come Due. The Debtor is
paying expenses as they come due. Not only are post-petition
expenses being paid, but the Real Estate is generating significant
net income, and the Debtor has been paying significant monthly
amounts to its secured mortgage lender throughout the bankruptcy
case. This third factor supports granting the Debtor an extension
of the Exclusivity Periods.

     * Factor 4: Reasonable Prospects for Filing a Viable Plan. The
Debtor has reasonable prospects for filing a viable plan. Here, the
Debtor has a realistic reorganization underway and has already
filed a confirmable Plan. The fourth factor weighs in favor of the
requested extension.

     * Factor 5: The Length of Time the Case Has Been Pending. This
bankruptcy case has been pending since only April, 2025. During
that time, the Debtor has been engaged in various administrative
tasks alongside its attempts to negotiate with its secured
creditors. Because the case has only been pending for a short time,
this fifth factor supports extending exclusivity.

     * Factor 6: Unresolved Contingencies. Finally, certain
unresolved contingencies prevent the Debtor from finalizing a
chapter 11 plan. The Debtor is still attempting to negotiate the
treatment of its secured mortgage lender's claim as well as other
lien creditors. The amount and nature of these claims will impact
their treatment and the treatment of other claims under a plan.
Therefore, this final factor thus weighs in favor of the Court
extending exclusivity.

301 W North Avenue, LLC is represented by:

     Robert W. Glantz, Esq.
     Jeffrey M. Schwartz, Esq.
     MUCH SHELIST, P.C.
     191 N. Wacker Drive, Suite 1800
     Chicago, IL 60606
     Telephone: (312) 521-2000
     Facsimile: (312) 521-3000
     Email: rglantz@muchlaw.com
            jschwartz@muchlaw.com

                           About 301 W North Avenue

301 W North Avenue LLC is a real estate debtor with a single asset,
as outlined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B), and its main property is
situated at 1552 N. North Park Avenue, Chicago, IL 60610.

301 W North Avenue LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 25-05275) on April 5,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $10 million to $50 million each.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Timothy A. Barnes handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Robert Glantz, Esq. ROBERT GLANTZ MUCH
SHELIST, P.C.

BDS III Mortgage Capital G LLC, as creditor, is represented by:

Steven Yachik, Esq.
William S. Gyves, Esq.
Benjamin Feder, Esq.
Philip A. Weintraub, Esq.
KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
3 World Trade Center
175 Greenwich Street New York, New York 10007
Telephone: (212) 808-7800
Facsimile: (212) 808-7897
Email: syachik@kelleydrye.com
            wgyves@kelleydrye.com  
            bfeder@kelleydrye.com
            pweintraub@kelleydrye.com


A.E. SCHLUETER: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to November 12
---------------------------------------------------------------
A.E. Schlueter Pipe Organ Sales and Service Inc. asked the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to extend its
exclusivity periods to file a plan of reorganization and obtain
acceptance thereof to November 12, 2025 and January 12, 2026,
respectively.

The Debtor is currently a debtor-in-possession and seeking to
restructure and reorganize Debtor's debts. Debtor is taking any and
all actions necessary to preserve, protect, and maximize the value
of the estate and effectively reorganize pursuant to Sections 1107
and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor is in the process of negotiating multiple change orders
and the corresponding assumption of a subcontract with J.E. Dunn
Construction Company regarding the Cadet Chapel at the United
States Air Force Academy. The outcome of negotiations over these
proposed change orders to Debtor's largest executory contract are
reasonably projected to significant impact Debtor's formulation of
a plan of reorganization.

The Debtor requests that the Exclusive Period to file a plan be
extended 60 days through and including November 12, 2025, and the
Exclusive Period to solicit acceptance or rejection of such plan be
extended 60 days through January 12, 2026. Debtor shows that
extending the exclusivity deadline is appropriate.

The Debtor explains that the request is made prior to expiration of
the current deadline. Debtor is in the process of negotiating
several large contracts to assist with their reorganization. Thus,
extending the exclusive period for filing and soliciting of a plan
is fair and equitable in this instance.

A.E. Schlueter Pipe Organ Sales and Service Inc. is represented
by:

     Thomas T. McClendon, Esq.
     Jones & Walden LLC
     699 Piedmont Avenue, NE
     Atlanta, GA 30308
     Tel: (404) 564-9300
     Email: TMcClendon@joneswalden.com

                  About A.E. Schlueter Pipe Organ Sales and
Service

A.E. Schlueter Pipe Organ Sales and Service Inc. designs, builds,
restores, and maintains pipe organs primarily in the Southeastern
United States.  Founded in Lithonia, Georgia, the Company provides
custom pipe organ construction, tuning, and repair services.

A.E. Schlueter Pipe Organ Sales and Service Inc. sought relief
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case
No. 25-55514) on May 16, 2025.  In its petition, the Debtor
estimated assets between $100,000 and $500,000 and estimated
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

The Debtors are represented by Thomas T. McClendon, Esq. at JONES &
WALDEN LLC.


AB & J JEWELRY: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------
AB & J Jewelry asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, Riverside, for authority to use cash
collateral and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor needs to use cash collateral to fund immediate operating
expenses critical to preserving the business.

The Debtor's business has experienced a significant downturn in
sales over the past year. In an effort to boost revenue, the Debtor
increased its advertising expenditures, but this strategy failed to
generate sufficient income to pay vendors. As a result, many
vendors refused to ship new inventory unless past-due invoices were
paid, which left the Debtor unable to fulfill new customer orders.
To offset this cash shortfall, the Debtor borrowed approximately
$1.3 million through merchant cash advance loans. These loans
required weekly debt payments of roughly $35,000, which further
strained the Debtor's ability to meet payroll, rent, insurance, and
other operating expenses. Despite efforts to obtain alternative
financing, market conditions and the Debtor's deteriorated
financial position prevented success.

Compounding the problem, several MCA lenders contacted payment
processors such as PayPal, Shopify, Affirm, and Zelle, instructing
them to withhold the proceeds of the Debtor's online sales and
redirect those funds to the lenders. This deprived the Debtor of
necessary revenue and left it with no choice but to file for
Chapter 11 protection to restructure its debts and stabilize
operations.

As of the petition date, AB&J had approximately $24,220 in its
debtor-in-possession accounts, representing the proceeds of online
sales. However, the Debtor acknowledges that this may be subject to
secured claims by various lenders, including approximately 14 loans
whose lien status remains under review.

Preliminary UCC filings suggest some lenders may have failed to
properly perfect their security interests. The Debtor's attorneys,
retained shortly before the bankruptcy filing, have not yet
completed an in-depth legal and financial review to determine,
which loans are secured, whether liens are valid and perfected, and
whether the loans are oversecured or undersecured.

To prevent immediate and irreparable harm to the business and its
estate, AB&J seeks emergency authorization to use cash collateral
in accordance with a limited, itemized initial budget covering
essential expenses such as payroll, insurance, and operations. The
Debtor also requests authority to deviate from this budget by up to
20% per line item (and in aggregate) on a rolling basis without
further court order and to carry forward unused amounts.

In exchange for the use of cash collateral, the Debtor proposes to
grant the MCA lenders replacement liens on post-petition assets and
seeks to provide super-priority administrative expense claims under
11 U.S.C. section 507(b) to protect lenders from any post-petition
diminution in collateral value.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Cwa2X6
from PacerMonitor.com.

                  About AB & J Jewelry

AB & J Jewelry operates a retail jewelry business, with sales
primarily through e-commerce and a physical store in Ontario,
California.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 6:25-bk-15659-SY) on
August 12, 2025. In the petition signed by Abraham Perez, chief
executive officer, the Debtor disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and
up to $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Scott H. Yun oversees the case.

Leonard Pena, Pena and Soma, APC, represents the Debtor as legal
counsel.


ABILENE CONVENTION: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Rating on Sr. Revenue Bonds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' rating on Abilene Convention
Center Hotel Development Corp.'s (ACCHDC) senior first-lien hotel
revenue bonds and revised the outlook to 'Stable' due to recent
strong performance. The recovery rating is '3', indicating
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%) recovery in the event
of a payment default.

The DoubleTree Abilene hotel has materially outperformed our
base-case forecasts, driven by a surge in business transient
activity directly linked to the Stargate data center projects
underway in Abilene. The projects represent over $500 billion in
investment over the next three to five years, supporting AI
infrastructure plans for developers including OpenAI.

Its year-to-date (YTD) fiscal year (FY) 2025 (ended July 2025)
occupancy reached 71% (compared with our 62% base-case forecast)
with revenue per available room (RevPAR) reported at $114 (18%
above S&P's $96 base case forecast). The hotel's position as the
only full-service hotel in the area has been a key competitive
advantage.

While the outlook is stable, several risks warrant ongoing
monitoring. The hotel's performance is heavily reliant on transient
demand (over 82% YTD FY 2025, with 40%-50% linked to data centers),
which can be volatile. Food and beverage (F&B) revenues have
underperformed due to the transient guest profile, and operating
costs are not yet fully stabilized, with potential for increased
expenses due to high occupancy. Furthermore, potential future
competition from new hotel development could dilute the market.
Despite these risks, the expected debt service coverage ratio
(DSCR) cushion and continued demand fueled by data center
development support the rating.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects a solid DSCR cushion, which
we expect to remain close to or above 1.50x during anticipated data
center development period and a minimum DSCR of 1.30x in 2030,
supported by ongoing data center developments and the hotel's
position as the only full-service option in Abilene. A downgrade is
possible if it significantly underperforms our forecasts and the
DSCR nears 1.0x, while an upgrade could occur with consistently
strong performance leading to a DSCR near 2.0x."

The project is a 200-key, upscale DoubleTree hotel in downtown
Abilene, Texas, which commenced operations in June 2023. ACCHDC, a
nonprofit local government corporation created by the City of
Abilene, issued $19.435 million first-lien senior (rated) and
$23.61 million second-lien subordinate (not rated) hotel revenue
bonds to fund the construction and development costs of the hotel.
The City of Abilene is not obligated to repay the hotel's senior
bonds.

It funded improvements to an adjacent convention center that is
connected to the new hotel, along with parking and other supporting
facilities. This was funded with the proceeds of the certificates
of obligation secured by the city's ad valorem tax revenue as well
as an equity contribution from the city. Garfield Public/Private
LLC is the project developer, and its fully owned subsidiary is the
asset manager for the asset. The hotel is operated by Hilton.

DoubleTree Abilene outperformed our base-case forecast materially
due to local data center developments. YTD FY 2025, the hotel's
occupancy rose to 71%, materially improved against S&P's base-case
forecast of 62% for the year. Increasing business transient
activities in Abilene, a major component of the hotel's demand,
fueled higher-than-expected occupancy. In particular, Stargate data
center project developments are underway in Abilene, with over $500
billion investment planned for the next three to five years,
supporting AI infrastructure plans for OpenAI, Oracle, Crusoe, and
other AI developers.

The hotel's highest monthly occupancy achieved over 80% for a few
months, which was phenomenally high given a hotel in its second
year of ramp-up. During the same period, the average daily rate
(ADR) was about $160, slightly lower than our $163 base-case
forecast. The actual RevPAR was reported at $114, about 18% above
our $96 base-case forecast. The pressure on the hotel's
profitability was also partially mitigated by a 10 percentage
points increase on gross operating profit margin over S&P's
base-case forecast (25.7% vs. 15.5%).

S&P said, "We expect it to achieve a DSCR well above 1.0x, compared
with our original forecast of 0.93x, for FY 2025. Being the only
full-service hotel in town has been its key strength competing in
the local market. We have updated our base-case forecast based on
recent actuals to reflect the hotel's strong lodging demand
expected in the next three to five years, which supports the 'BB-'
rating."

The hotel's performance could remain volatile in the long term.
Risks include a high concentration of transient demand, uncertainty
on F&B revenues and operating cost, and potentially increasing
local competition. Lodging demand from data center development is
mostly transient. YTD FY 2025, over 82% of the hotel's demand was
transient, and 40-50% of this demand was sourced from activities
for data center projects. This could be at risk in the long term
due to uncertainty associated with data center development as it
progresses. S&P said, "In contrast, we view group business as a
more stable source of demand based on our observation on historical
performance from our rated large-scale convention center hotels.
With more transient guests, F&B revenues underperformed because
less group business yields a lack of banquet revenue, and typically
we view group guests are more willing to spend on F&B and less
price sensitive."

S&P said, "In addition, we still believe the cost profile is not
fully stabilized, even though the profit margin outperformed our
base-case forecast. (We expect profit margins for a stabilized
hotel of 30%-45%.) High occupancy could potentially lead to
excessive hiring and high out-of-pocket costs for extra maintenance
of the property.

"Finally, a room supply increase could potentially dilute the
market and cause more competition. However, we do not acknowledge
any immediate new competitors in the pipeline. These potential risk
factors are incorporated into our analysis, which supports our
'BB-' rating.

"The stable outlook reflects ACCHDC's solid DSCR cushion under our
base-case forecast, which is supported by the development of data
centers in Abilene. We expect DSCRs close to or above 1.50x during
the anticipated data center development period and a minimum DSCR
of 1.30x in 2030, a sufficient cushion to support its 'BB-' rating.
With massive data center project investments planned out for the
next three to five years in Abilene and given that this hotel
project is the only full-service hotel in town, we believe it would
have sufficient demand to fuel up a more predicable performance. We
believe the trend of strong transient demand will continue as the
development of data centers moves forward.

"The stable outlook reflects ACCHDC's solid DSCR cushion under our
base-case forecast, which is supported by the development of data
centers in Abilene. We expect DSCRs close to or above 1.50x in the
next five years and a minimum DSCR of 1.30x in 2030, a sufficient
cushion to support its 'BB-' rating.

"We could lower the senior debt rating if the hotel underperforms
our base-case occupancy and ADR forecast or incurs significantly
higher-than-forecasted costs that cause the base-case minimum DSCR
to drop close to 1.0x.

"We could raise the senior debt rating if the hotel performs
significantly better than our updated base-case forecast, leading
to a minimum base case senior DSCR close to 2.0x."




ADVENT TECHNOLOGIES: Fisal Q2 Net Loss Narrows to $3.8 Million
--------------------------------------------------------------
Advent Technologies Holdings, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting
a net loss of $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2025, compared to a net loss of $11.3 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2024.

Net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $99
thousand, compared to a net revenue of $654 thousand for the same
period in 2024.

For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a net
loss of $7.1 million, compared to a net loss of $20.6 million for
the same period in 2024.

Net revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $231
thousand, compared to a net revenue of $3.4 million for the same
period in 2024.

At June 30, 2025 and for the six months then ended, the Company had
$0.1 million in cash and cash equivalents, used $1.2 million of
cash in operating activities, had $1.5 million in current assets
and $29.4 million in current liabilities, leaving the Company a
working capital deficit of $(27.8) million.

A major financial challenge and significant risk facing the Company
is a lack of positive cash flow and liquidity. The Company's
ability to meet its liquidity needs will largely depend on its
ability to raise capital in the very short term and generate cash
in the future. If the Company is unable to obtain sufficient
funding, it could be required to delay its development efforts,
limit activities, and further reduce research and development
costs, which could adversely affect its business prospects and
delivery of contractual obligations. A cash shortfall at any point
in time over the next twelve months could result in the Company
failing to meet its overdue and current obligations which could
trigger action against the Company and/or its subsidiaries for
liquidation by employees, authorities, or creditors. Because of the
uncertainty in securing additional funding, delays in growth of
revenue, failure to materialize cost-cutting efforts and the
insufficient amount of cash and cash equivalents as of the
consolidated financial statement filing date, management has
concluded that substantial doubt exists with respect to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern next 12 months.

A full-text copy of the Company's Form 10-Q is available at:

                  https://tinyurl.com/bdsezx5p

                      About Advent Technologies

Headquartered in Livermore, Calif., Advent Technologies Holdings,
Inc. is an advanced materials and technology development company
operating in the fuel cell and hydrogen technology space. Advent
develops, manufactures and assembles the critical components that
determine the performance of hydrogen fuel cells and other energy
systems. To date, Advent's principal operations have been to
develop and manufacture Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA), and fuel
cell stacks and complete fuel cell systems for a range of customers
in the stationary power, portable power, automotive, aviation,
energy storage and sensor markets.

The Woodlands, Texas-based M&K CPAS, PLLC, the Company's auditor
since 2024, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated June 6, 2025, attached to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, citing that the
Company has yet to achieve profitable operations, has negative cash
flows from operating activities, and is dependent upon future
issuances of equity or other financings to fund ongoing operations
all of which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had $6.7 million in total assets,
against $36.1 million in total liabilities.


AGREETA SOLUTIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Agreeta Solutions USA, LLC
        107 Technology Pkwy
        Suite 674
        Peachtree Corners, GA 30092

Business Description: Agreeta Solutions USA, LLC develops digital
                      solutions for the agriculture technology
                      sector, offering platforms that integrate
                      smart farming, traceability, and agri-
                      commerce tools.  The Company operates in
                      Peachtree Corners, Georgia, and focuses on
                      improving farm productivity, supply chain
                      transparency, and market connectivity.  Its
                      services include precision agriculture
                      analytics, end-to-end food product
                      traceability, and support for farmer
                      networks.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia

Case No.: 25-59677

Debtor's Counsel: Theodore N. Stapleton, Esq.
                  THEODORE N. STAPLETON
                  2802 Paces Ferry Rd SE
                  Suite 100-B
                  Atlanta, GA 30339
                  Tel: (770) 436-3334
                  Fax: (404) 935-5344
                  E-mail: tstaple@tstaple.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Corinna Baban as manager.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/NWUXUCI/Agreeta_Solutions_USA_LLC__ganbke-25-59677__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                           Nature of Claim   Claim Amount

1. American Express                   Credit Card          $28,153
P.O. Box 60189                          Purchases
City of Industry, CA 91716

2. Buhler Inc.                                            $587,000
13105 12th Ave N
Plymouth, MN 55441

3. Capital One                        Credit Card         $235,462
PO Box 71087                            Purchases
Charlotte, NC
28272-1087

4. Cebaban, LLC                       Member Loan       $4,325,850

2942 E Sunshine St.
Springfield, MO 65804

5. Dakota, Minn. &                     Trade Debt          $57,000
Eastern Railroad Corp
427 West 12th St.
Kansas City, MO 64104

6. Euler Hermes Ins. Company      Insurance Claim         $210,000
100 International Driver
22nd Floor
Suite 22000
Baltimore, MD 21202

7. FGP Law, LLC                    Legal Services           $9,000
555 Sun Valley Drive
Suite N-3
Roswell, GA 30076

8. Georgia Revenue Department       Payroll Taxes          $56,000
P.O. Box 740387
Atlanta, GA
30374-0387

9. Internal Revenue Service             941 Taxes         $248,190
401 W. Peachtree
Street, N.W.
Stop 334-D
Atlanta, GA 30308

10. IST Management                     Trade Debt          $78,000
Services, Inc.
1341 Moreland Ave. SE
Suite 2000
Atlanta, GA 30316

11. JP Morgan Chase                   Credit Card          $45,743
PO Box 1423                             Purchases
Charlotte, NC
28201-1423

12. Landstar Global                    Trade Debt         $140,000
Logistics, Inc.
13410 Sutton Park Dr S
Jacksonville, FL 32224

13. Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc.                         $20,000,000
3005 Rocky Mountain Ave
Loveland, CO 80538

14. Robbins Alloy                  Legal Services          $15,000
Belinfante Littlefield LLC
500 14th Street, NW
Atlanta, GA 30318

15. Schklar & Heim, LLC                Trade Debt         $680,000
945 East Paces Ferry Road
Resurgens Plaza
Suite 2250
Atlanta, GA 30326

16. South Louisiana Rail               Trade Debt         $971,484
Facility, LLC
19400 Bob Odom Pkwy
Iowa, LA 70647

17. Surtidora Abarrotera                  Customer        $565,000
De Guadalajara, S.A                       Deposits
c/o Eduardo Dela
Pana Bernal
200 South Biscayne Blvd.
Suite 4100
Miami, FL 33131

18. Swani Spice Mills                Business Loan     $15,610,651
PVT. Ltd.
4, Hari Niwas
C-Road, Churchgate
Mumbai,
Maharashtra, India
400 020
Mumbai 400020

19. Taylor Porter                   Legal Services        $155,000
450 Laurel Street
8th Floor
Baton Rouge, LA  70801

20. The Law Offices of              Legal Services         $78,000
Kenneth Drammer
567 Broadway
Massapequa, NY
11758-5019


AIR CANADA: Moody's Affirms 'Ba2' CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has changed Air Canada's (Air Canada) rating
outlook to stable from positive, and affirmed Air Canada's Ba2
corporate family rating, Ba2-PD probability of default rating, Ba1
senior secured notes rating, and Ba1 senior secured term loan
rating. The company's speculative grade liquidity rating (SGL)
remains unchanged at SGL-1.

Moody's also affirmed the ratings of the company's enhanced
equipment trust certificates ("EETCs"). See the debt list herein
for the actions on the EETCs.

The outlook change to stable reflects a delay in margin improvement
and sustained lower leverage compared to prior projections,
resulting from a challenging operating environment coupled with
significant capital expenditures anticipated over the next three
years as the company receives new aircraft deliveries.  Air Canada
is forecasted to see limited adjusted EBITDA growth in 2025 and
2026, as modest capacity growth and stable passenger revenue are
somewhat offset by higher costs that include increased wages,
maintenance, and airport fees. The recent flight attendant strike
will have a near term limited effect on EBITDA however Moody's
expects once resolved the new agreement will contribute to
increasing wage costs for the company and be a headwind for
margins. Moody's also expects margins to remain relatively steady
in the short term, with gradual recovery projected as operational
modernization advances and industry dynamics improve.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Air Canada's rating benefits from a leading position in the
duopolistic Canadian air travel market, Moody's expectations that
adjusted debt/EBITDA will remain in the mid 3x range, very good
liquidity and strengthening financial flexibility with a meaningful
number of unencumbered aircraft and a valuable loyalty program
(Aeroplan). Longer-term, the continued fleet transformation will
improve the company's efficiency and allow it to preserve its cost
profile.

The company's rating is constrained by cost inflation including
labor and demand related expenses, exposure to volatile fuel prices
which could pressure margins, and potential for increased
competition in markets where Air Canada operates.

Air Canada will have very good liquidity (SGL-1) through September
2026. The company's sources include cash and short-term investments
of about CAD 6.4 billion at June 2025, and a fully available $975
million credit facility that expires in January 2029. These sources
will be more than sufficient to fund approximately CAD1.6 billion
of annual mandatory debt and lease repayments and Moody's
expectations of about CAD400 million of negative free cash flow
through September 2026.  Air Canada has a US$1.2 billion note that
is due in August 2026. Moody's expects compliance with Air Canada's
two financial covenants (minimum cash reserves and minimum
collateral coverage ratio) over the next 12 months. Possible
additional liquidity could be provided by Air Canada's unencumbered
asset pool (excluding the value of Aeroplan and Air Canada
Vacations) which is in excess of CAD7 billion.  

The EETC ratings consider estimates of loan-to-value for each of
the transactions. Moody's believes the aircraft models that
comprise the collateral across these transactions will remain
important to Air Canada's network, which supports Moody's
expectations that the company would likely affirm these
transactions if it were to reorganize under Canadian bankruptcy and
insolvency law. The aircraft collateral are, 777-300ERs and 787-9s
(2015-2) and 737-8 MAXs and 787-9s (2017-1). The 787s and 737 MAXes
are the most fuel efficient in the fleet; the 777-300ERs have high
seating density, and are used mainly on long haul flights to Europe
and Asia. These models provide emissions benefits as well.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Air Canada
will maintain its competitive position and maintain leverage below
4x as it spends on its aircraft replacement program.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if Air Canada is able to maintain
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA towards 3x, EBITDA margins toward 20%, very
good liquidity, and a track record of conservative financial
policy.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company's liquidity or
operating performance deteriorate or adjusted debt/EBITDA is likely
to be sustained above 4x.

Changes in EETC ratings can result from any changes in the
underlying credit quality or ratings of the company or Moody's
opinions of the importance of the aircraft collateral to the
operations. Changes in estimates of current and projected aircraft
market values, which will affect estimates of loan-to-value, could
also result in a change to EETC ratings.

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS

Issuer: Air Canada
    
Affirmations:

LT Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba2-PD

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba1

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba1

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

Issuer: Air Canada Series 2015-2 Pass Through Trusts

Affirmations:

Senior Secured Enhanced Equipment Trust, Affirmed A1

Senior Secured Enhanced Equipment Trust, Affirmed Baa2

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

Issuer: Air Canada Series 2017-1 Pass Through Trusts

Affirmations:

Senior Secured Enhanced Equipment Trust, Affirmed A2

Senior Secured Enhanced Equipment Trust, Affirmed Aa2

Senior Secured Enhanced Equipment Trust, Affirmed Baa1

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

Issuer: Air Canada Series 2020-1 Pass Through Trusts

Affirmations:

Senior Secured Enhanced Equipment Trust, Affirmed Ba2

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

Air Canada is the largest provider of scheduled airline passenger
services within, and to and from Canada. The company is
headquartered in Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada.

The principal methodology used in rating Air Canada was Passenger
Airlines published in August 2024.

The net effect of any adjustments applied to rating factor scores
or scorecard outputs under the primary methodology(ies), if any,
was not material to the ratings addressed in this announcement.


ALEON METALS: Court Poised to Approve September 29 Auction
----------------------------------------------------------
Ben Zigterman of Law360 reports that on Friday, August 22, 2025, a
Texas bankruptcy judge said he will approve bidding procedures for
the assets of specialty recycler Aleon Metals LLC, clearing the way
for a September 29, 2025 auction led by a stalking horse bid from
its debtor-in-possession lenders.

                 About Aleon Metals LLC

Aleon Metals LLC is a global leader in recycling spent petroleum
catalysts and lithium-ion batteries, focusing on metals critical to
infrastructure and renewable energy.

Aleon Metals LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 25-90305) on August 17,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $100 million and $500 million each.

The Debtor is represented by Jason L. Boland, Esq. at Norton Rose
Fulbright US LLP.


ALL PHASE: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------
All Phase Solutions, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division, for
authority to use cash collateral and provide adequate protection.

The emergency arises because the Debtor's day-to-day operations
depend on access to this cash, which is encumbered by liens from
three lenders:

1. JP Morgan Chase Bank (a traditional secured lender owed $104,184
with $24,073 past due),
2. Argonaut Insurance Company (holder of a $406,863 note from a
performance bond-related project), and
3. CFS CAP, LLC, a merchant cash advance firm that sweeps 5% of the
Debtor's bank deposits weekly under an agreement dated January 26,
2023.

A fourth lender, Cacique Capital, LLC, holds liens on payment
streams from two government contracts, which are paid into "control
accounts." The Debtor does not seek access to those funds.

As of the bankruptcy filing date, the Debtor had about $23,000 in
unencumbered cash outside of the control accounts. The Debtor
requests interim authority to use this cash collateral to pay
critical business expenses, as outlined in the budget, with a 10%
variance.

To adequately protect the lenders' interests, the Debtor proposes
to grant replacement liens on all post-petition cash, mirroring the
lenders' pre-petition lien priorities. However, the Debtor reserves
all rights to later challenge the validity, amount, priority, or
secured status of any lender's claim.

A court hearing is scheduled for August 28.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=AJ7RE7
from PacerMonitor.com.

                   About All Phase Solutions LLC

All Phase Solutions, LLC provides services including construction,
demolition, environmental remediation, civil works, uniform
production, and security staffing, primarily to U.S. government
agencies.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 25-19745-MAM) on August
22, 2025. In the petition signed by Saleh Rabah, president, the
Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Mindy A. Mora oversees the case.

Aaron Wernick, Esq., at Wernick Law PLLC, represents the Debtor as
legal counsel.


ALMITAS LATINAS: Melissa Haselden Named Subchapter V Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed Melissa Haselden, Esq., at
Haselden Farrow, PLLC as Subchapter V trustee for Almitas Latinas,
LLC.

Ms. Haselden will be paid an hourly fee of $595 for her services as
Subchapter V trustee and will be reimbursed for work-related
expenses incurred.

Ms. Haselden declared that she is a disinterested person according
to Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Subchapter V trustee can be reached at:

     Melissa A. Haselden, Esq.  
     Haselden Farrow, PLLC
     700 Milam, Suite 1300
     Pennzoil Place
     Houston, TX 77002
     Telephone: (832) 819-1149
     Facsimile: (866) 405-6038
     mhaselden@haseldenfarrow.com

                      About Almitas Latinas

Almitas Latinas, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 25-34816) on August 19,
2025, with $100,001 to $500,000 in assets and $500,001 to $1
million in liabilities.

Judge Jeffrey P. Norman presides over the case.

Reese W. Baker, Esq., at Baker & Associates represents the Debtor
as legal counsel.


ALPHA WOLF: Case Summary & One Unsecured Creditor
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Alpha Wolf Leasing, LLC
        310 Mann Drive
        Collierville, TN 38017

Business Description: Alpha Wolf Leasing, LLC provides leasing
                      services for commercial vehicles, serving
                      clients in the freight and logistics
                      industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 22, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Tennessee

Case No.: 25-24265

Judge: Hon. M Ruthie Hagan

Debtor's Counsel: Steven N. Douglass, Esq.
                  HARRIS SHELTON, PLLC
                  40 S. Main Street, Suite 2210
                  Memphis, TN 38103-2555
                  Tel: (901) 525-1455
                  Fax: (901) 526-4084

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Spencer Harris as CEO.

The Debtor listed Bank of America, located at PO Box 15284 in
Wilmington, Delaware, as its sole unsecured creditor, with a claim
totaling $2.48 million.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/FIPVVNQ/Alpha_Wolf_Leasing_LLC__tnwbke-25-24265__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


AMERICAN FORKLIFT: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to Sept. 23
-------------------------------------------------------------------
American Forklift Rental & Supply, LLC received fourth interim
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Florida, Orlando Division, to use the cash collateral of its
secured creditors including Ameris Bank, MCA Rehab, LLC and Forward
Financing, LLC.

The fourth interim order signed by Judge Lori Vaughan authorized
the Debtor to use cash collateral through September 23 to pay the
amounts expressly authorized by the court; and the expenses set
forth in the budget, plus an amount not to exceed 10% for each line
item.

The Debtor projects total operational expenses of $27,070.66 for
the period from May to October.

Each creditor with a security interest in cash collateral will have
a perfected post-petition lien on the cash collateral, with the
same validity, priority and extent as its pre-bankruptcy lien.

The Debtor must comply with all debtor-in-possession obligations,
allow creditor access to business records and premises, and
maintain ordinary operations.

The next hearing is set for September 23.

                About American Forklift Rental & Supply

American Forklift Rental & Supply, LLC provides forklift rentals,
sales, parts, service, and safety training across Central Florida,
including Orlando, Tampa, and surrounding counties. The company
offers new and used forklifts in various fuel types and sizes, with
flexible rental terms and included maintenance. Headquartered in
Orlando, American Forklift Rental & Supply has served the region
for over 25 years and remains owner-operated to ensure personalized
customer support.

American Forklift Rental & Supply sought relief under Subchapter V
of Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case
No. 25-02765) on May 5, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reported
total assets of $1,280,342 and total liabilities of $890,93.

Judge Lori V. Vaughan handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Melissa A Youngman, Esq., at Winter
Park Estate Plans & Reorgs.


AMPLIFYBIO LLC: Hires Epiq Corporate as Administrative Advisor
--------------------------------------------------------------
AmplifyBio LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Ohio to hire Epiq Corporate Restructuring
LLC to serve as its administrative advisor.

Epiq will provide these services:

   (a) assist with the preparation of the Debtors' Schedules and
Statements and gather data in conjunction therewith;

   (b) assist with solicitation, balloting, and tabulation of
votes, and prepare related reports;

   (c) prepare an official ballot certification and, if necessary,
testify in support of the ballot tabulation results;

   (d) provide confidential data rooms, if necessary;

   (e) manage and coordinate any distributions pursuant to a
Chapter 11 plan; and

   (f) provide other processing, solicitation, balloting, and
administrative services.

Epiq will be paid 90% of its undisputed fees and 100% of its
undisputed expenses on a provisional basis, subject to court
approval.

Prior to the petition date, the Debtors provided Epiq an advance of
$25,000. Epiq will also seek reimbursement for reasonable expenses
in accordance with the Engagement Agreement.

Epiq has represented that it is a "disinterested person" within the
meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC  
   777 Third Avenue, 12th Floor  
   New York, NY 10017  
   Telephone: (646) 282-2500  
   Website: https://www.epiqglobal.com

                    About AmplifyBio LLC

AmplifyBio LLC is a preclinical contract research and manufacturing
organization based in Ohio that offers integrated services for
therapeutic development, including R&D, preclinical testing, and
scalable manufacturing for advanced therapies such as cell and gene
therapies, mRNA, and non-viral gene editing platforms. Formed as a
2021 spinout from Battelle Memorial Institute, the Company has
expanded through acquisitions and facility investments, including a
350,000-square-foot cGMP manufacturing site in New Albany. Its
wholly owned subsidiary, ADOC SSF, LLC, is fully integrated into
its operations and participates in scientific, operational, and
financial activities.

AmplifyBio LLC and affiliate sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Lead Case No. 25 52140) on
May 16, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets
between $100 million and $500 million and estimated liabilities
between $10 million and $50 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Mina Nami Khorrami handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Scott N. Opincar, Esq. and Maria G.
Carr, Esq. at MCDONALD HOPKINS LLC. HUTCHISON PLLC is the Debtor's
co-counsel. EPIQ CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC is the Debtors'
Notice, Claims and Balloting Agent.


ANNALEE DOLLS: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to November 6
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kimberly Bacher of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Hampshire extended Annalee Dolls, LLC's exclusive periods to
file a plan of reorganization and obtain acceptance thereof to
November 6, 2025 and January 5, 2026, respectively.

As shared by Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor explains that
the history of this case suggests that there is a reasonable
possibility of a reasonable consensual plan of reorganization based
on the distinctly limited value of the property of the estate. To
the best of Debtor's knowledge and belief, no alternate,
substantial plan has been or will be held off by continuing debtor
exclusivity.

The Debtor claims that the history and record of this case shows
that Debtor has addressed in good faith objections made by parties
in interest. It has managed to accommodate most of the concerns
expressed by parties in interest.

The Debtor asserts that it is not holding any creditors hostage.
Debtor has made substantial adequate protection payments to
Customers in this case. All other creditors that claim to be
secured have tacitly consented to Debtor's use of cash collateral.
None of them have filed a pleading in this case, let alone sought
relief from the automatic stay.

The Debtor further asserts that no creditor or any other party in
interest has expressed an interest in filing a plan for the
reorganization of Debtor. Should any person wish to file a
reorganization plan, this Court could terminate exclusivity
following notice and a hearing for good cause proven to the
satisfaction of this Court.

                         About Annalee Dolls LLC

Annalee Dolls, LLC is an American company known for its handcrafted
felt dolls that embody holiday themes and whimsical charm.  Founded
in 1934, the business has become a staple of collectible Americana,
with its headquarters and flagship store located in Meredith, New
Hampshire. The company continues to attract visitors and collectors
with its nostalgic products and scenic gift shop near Lake
Winnipesaukee.

Annalee Dolls sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 25-10232) on April 11, 2025. In its
petition, the Debtor reported between $1 million and $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.

Judge Kimberly Bacher handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   William S. Gannon, Esq.
   William S. Gannon PLLC
   Tel: 603-621-0833
   bgannon@gannonlawfirm.com


ANNALEE DOLLS: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral Until Sept 30
---------------------------------------------------------
Annalee Dolls, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Hampshire for authority to use up to $317,879 in cash
collateral during the period of September 1 to 30. This request
came as part of an amended budget submission and was approved to
allow the Debtor to continue operating its business while ensuring
creditor protections through adequate safeguards.

The proposed order, which expires on September 30 unless extended,
enables the Debtor to continue operating while under bankruptcy
protection. However, it prohibits the Debtor from making any
payments to professionals, such as legal or accounting fees,
without further court approval. Any funds allocated for
professional fees must be held in a designated debtor-in-possession
escrow account and can only be used if and when authorized by the
court.

To protect the interests of secured creditors, specifically
Customers Bank, the court ordered that Annalee Dolls must make a
$36,950 adequate protection payment by September 15. Additional
requirements include maintaining property insurance, paying
facility costs, and preserving the value of the collateral. The
order also grants replacement liens to secured creditors, ensuring
their pre-petition lien priorities remain intact. These liens will
automatically cease if a creditor's claim is later disallowed. If
the value of a creditor's collateral diminishes due to the use of
cash collateral, the creditor may receive an administrative claim
under 11 U.S.C. Section 507(b).

The Debtor is required to file another application if it wishes to
continue using cash collateral beyond September. Any objections to
that application must be filed before a future hearing, the date of
which is to be determined. The September budget forecasts $225,488
in revenue, bringing total available cash to $361,977 after
accounting for beginning balances. Major expenses include $101,014
in employee costs, $31,800 in advertising, $17,750 in office and
miscellaneous expenses, and $66,150 in DIP loan-related costs.
After all disbursements, the projected ending cash balance is
$67,351, split between the operations account and the escrow
account.

A copy of the proposed order is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qJzItM from PacerMonitor.com.

                     About Annalee Dolls LLC

Annalee Dolls, LLC is an American company known for its handcrafted
felt dolls that embody holiday themes and whimsical charm. Founded
in 1934, the business has become a staple of collectible Americana,
with its headquarters and flagship store located in Meredith, New
Hampshire. The company continues to attract visitors and collectors
with its nostalgic products and scenic gift shop near Lake
Winnipesaukee.

Annalee Dolls sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 25-10232) on April 11, 2025. In its
petition, the Debtor reported between $1 million and $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.

Judge Kimberly Bacher handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by William S. Gannon, Esq. at William S.
Gannon, PLLC.


APOLLO CONSTRUCTION: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Apollo Construction & Engineering Services, Inc.
          FDBA Thomas G. Kamprath
        1821 36th Street SE
        Ruskin, FL 33570

Business Description: Apollo Construction & Engineering Services,
                      Inc. provides full-service general
                      contracting and construction services across
                      Florida, specializing in commercial,
                      industrial, and government projects.
                      Operating since 1987, the Company delivers
                      direct project accountability, seamless
                      coordination, and union-certified workforce
                      solutions to support construction of
                      commercial properties, public
                      infrastructure, healthcare facilities,
                      schools, and transportation hubs.  It holds
                      active state licenses in mechanical
                      engineering, plumbing and piping, concrete
                      and structural work, fire protection, and
                      general contracting, offering end-to-end
                      solutions from planning to build-out.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 25-06058

Judge: Hon. Catherine Peek McEwen

Debtor's Counsel: Samantha L Dammer, Esq.
                  BLEAKLEY BAVOL DENMAN & GRACE
                  15316 N. Florida Avenue
                  Tampa, FL 33613
                  Tel: (813) 221-3759
                  Email: sdammer@bbdglaw.com

Total Assets: $1,135,031

Total Liabilities: $1,931,003

The petition was signed by Ahmed Zahran as vice president.

Ahmed Zahran signed the petition as vice president.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 15 unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/J7QGXJI/Apollo_Construction__Engineering__flmbke-25-06058__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: Frank J. D'Amico Represents Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The law firm of Frank J. D'Amico, Jr. APLC filed a verified
statement pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure to disclose that in the Chapter 11 case of The Roman
Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans, the firm
represents creditors.

The Creditors have retained the counsel as their legal counsel with
respect to matters arising in the Bankruptcy Case and for purposes
of asserting claims and protecting other rights against the
Debtor.

The Creditors' address and the nature and amount of disclosable
economic interests held in relation to the Debtor are:

1. A.B. Doe
   c/o Frank J. D'Amico, Jr.
   4608 Rye Street
   Metairie, Louisiana
   70006
   Tel: (504) 525-7272
   frank@damicolaw.net
   beverly@damicolaw.net
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
debtor as set forth in his claim control
   number 5LX54RXWAL2 filed on 11/16/2020.

2. G.A. Doe (deceased)
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: URJJJV5W3J0 filed on 11/16/2020.

3. J.B. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in Case No. 2020-
   3456 in Civil District Court of Orleans Parish filed on April
30, 2020, and claim control number
   BJGTF0KOSA2 filed on 11/16/2020.

4. M.B. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: 4P15QCQJ210 filed on 11/16/2020.

5. E. C. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: AYULUOVC2QD filed on 11/16/2020.

6. P.C. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: MXBSFMUARGD filed on 11/16/2020.

7. E. M. C. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: PDCHHRIZA0P filed on 11/16/2020.

8. M.C. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: UK1QCAB53YU filed on 11/16/2020.

9. S.D. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in Case No. 2020-
   4477 in Civil District Court of Orleans Parish filed on June 10,
2020, and claim control number
   SNPP0B1RRZK filed on 11/16/2020.

10. W.G. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in Case No. 807-155
   in the 24th Judicial District Court for Jefferson Parish filed
on June 10, 2020, and claim control
   number D0BDCKV1ODA filed on 11/16/2020.

11. M.G. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: PNHQJQFX0YU filed on 11/16/2020.

12. T.G. Doe (Deceased)
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: OGFSAPTEDDY filed on 11/16/2020.

13. M.H. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: B3KU1TECSK0 filed on 11/18/2020.

14. M.H. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: FA11PMHDRAT filed on 11/18/2020.

15. C.H. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: JUPM3MW2KEF filed on 11/18/2020.

16. G.L. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: TVXB5GJTHEWA filed on 11/18/2020.

17. J.L. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: HEGZ1S2APW0 filed on 11/18/2020.

18. B.M. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: DKXFJAKH42K filed on 11/18/2020.

19. S.O. Doe (Deceased)
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: 2MRN0V5YNGC filed on 11/18/2020.

20. F.R. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: L4ANI2OVV1R filed on 11/18/2020.

21. W.S. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: NCUUAZAUHYZ filed on 11/18/2020.

22. M.V. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: W2R3VUBDDNU filed on 11/18/2020.

23. J.W. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: XKG21PSF14P filed on 11/18/2020.

24. M.Y. Doe
   * The creditor asserts claims and causes of action against the
Debtor as set forth in claim control
   number: IHXYRPJSF4 filed on 11/18/2020.

The law firm can be reached at:

     FRANK J. D'AMICO, JR., APLC
     Frank J. D’Amico, Jr., Esq.
     4608 Rye Street
     Metairie, Louisiana 70006
     Tel: 504-525-7272
     Email: frank@damicolaw.net
            beverly@damicolaw.net

                               About Roman Catholic Church of
                               The Archdiocese Of New Orleans

The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans --
https://www.nolacatholic.org/ -- is a non-profit religious
corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Louisiana.

Created as a diocese in 1793, and established as an archdiocese in
1850, the Archdiocese of New Orleans has educated hundreds of
thousands in its schools, provided religious services to its
churches and provided charitable assistance to individuals in need,
including those affected by hurricanes, floods, natural disasters,
war, civil unrest, plagues, epidemics, and illness. Currently, the
archdiocese's geographic footprint occupies over 4,200 square miles
in southeast Louisiana and includes eight civil parishes:
Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John
the Baptist, St. Tammany, and Washington.

The Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of New Orleans sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 20-10846) on May 1,
2020. The archdiocese was estimated to have $100 million to $500
million in assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

Judge Meredith S. Grabill oversees the case.

Jones Walker, LLP and Blank Rome, LLP, serve as the archdiocese's
bankruptcy counsel and special counsel, respectively. Donlin,
Recano & Company, Inc., is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 5 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on May 20, 2020. The committee is represented
by the law firms of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP and Locke
Lord, LLP. Berkeley Research Group, LLC is the committee's
financial advisor.


ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: Insurers Oppose Ch. 11 Test Cases
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jennifer Mandato of Law360 reports that the insurers for the
Archdiocese of San Francisco have asked a California bankruptcy
court to block an agreement between the archdiocese and sexual
abuse claimants that would permit five lawsuits to move forward
despite the Chapter 11 automatic stay.

                 About San Francisco Archdiocese

The Roman Catholic Archbishop of San Francisco, Archdiocese of San
Francisco, is a tax exempt religious organisation. The Archdiocese
of San Francisco is a Latin Church ecclesiastical territory or
diocese of the Catholic Church in the northern California region of
the United States. The Archdiocese of San Francisco was erected on
July 29, 1853, by Pope Pius IX and its cathedral is the Cathedral
of Saint Mary of the Assumption.

The Archdiocese sought relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 23-30564) on Aug. 21, 2023. In the
petition filed by Fr. Patrick Summerhays as vicar general and
moderator of the Curia, the Archdiocese reported $100 million to
$500 million in assets and liabilities.

The Hon. Dennis Montali oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Feldserstein Fitzgerald Willoughby as counsel.


ASOCIACION HOSPITAL: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Asociacion Hospital Del Maestro, Inc.
        550 Calle Sergio Cuevas Bustamante
        San Juan, PR 00918

Business Description: Asociacion Hospital del Maestro, Inc., also
                      known as Hospital El Maestro, is a nonprofit
                      general medical and surgical hospital
                      located in San Juan, Puerto Rico, that was
                      founded in 1955 to serve the teaching
                      community and has since expanded to provide
                      services to the broader population.  The
                      hospital operates about 126 staffed beds and
                      offers emergency care, intensive care,
                      radiology, surgery, hemodialysis, and a
                      range of medical specialties for children
                      and adults.  It is accredited by the Joint
                      Commission and functions as a 501(c)(3)
                      organization with a focus on healthcare,
                      education, and community service.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico

Case No.: 25-03780

Judge: Hon. Enrique S Lamoutte Inclan

Debtor's Counsel: Wigberto Lugo Mender, Esq.
                  LUGO MENDER GROUP, LLC
                  100 Carr. 165 Suite 501
                  Guaynabo, PR 00968-8052
                  Tel: 787-707-0404
                  Email: wlugo@lugomender.com

Debtor's
Financial
Consultant:       CPA LUIS R. CARRASQUILLO & CO, PSC

Total Assets: $13,396,955

Total Liabilities: $39,669,466

The petition was signed by Pablo A. Serrano as secretary of the
Board of Directors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/F2BM4WY/ASOCIACION_HOSPITAL_DEL_MAESTRO__prbke-25-03780__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                            Nature of Claim  Claim Amount

1. Alpha Biomedical & Diagnostic          Supplies &      $185,669
PO Box 670                                 Materials
Caguas, PR 00726

2. AUT De Acueductos Y                 Water & Sewer      $834,536
Alcantarillados                             Services
PO Box 7066
Balance as of 8/6/2025
San Juan, PR
00916-7066

3. Baxter Sales Corp                      Supplies &      $148,000
PO Box 70257                               Materials
San Juan, PR
00936-8257

4. Boston Scientific Del                  Supplies &      $133,263
Caribe Inc.                                Materials
Torre Chardon Building
350 Chardon Ave
Suite 820
San Juan, PR 00918

5. Cancio, Nadal &                    Legal Services      $376,409
Rivera LLC
403 Ave Munoz Rivera
San Juan, PR 00918

6. Cardinal Health PR                      Medicines    $1,394,541
PO Box 70220
San Juan, PR 00936

7. Damaris Santos Arrieta                    Medical    $1,713,490

David Efron Law Office                   Malpractice
PO Box 29314                        Case No. 15-3114
San Juan, PR
00929-6459

8. David Rhoe                                Medical       $70,421
Paseo De La Fuente                      Professional
D4 Calle Tivoli                              Service
San Juan, PR 00926

9. Department of Labor and          Unemployment Tax      $645,630
Human Resources
of Puerto Rico
PO Box 195540
San Juan, PR 00919-5540

10. Department of Treasury                Income Tax    $3,803,948
Bankruptcy Section                      Withholdings
PO Box 9024140
Office 424 B
San Juan, PR 00902-4140

11. Infomedika Inc.                         Software       $80,838
PO Box 11095
San Juan, PR 00922

12. Internal Revenue                   Payroll Taxes      $680,937
Service
PO Box 7346
Philadelphia, PA
19101-7346

13. JCG Medical Emergency                 Contracted      $302,000
Services PSC                                Services
100 Ave Laurel
Bayamon, PR 00956

14. Luma Energy                             Electric   $11,698,492
PO Box 364267                                  Power
San Juan, PR 00936                          Services

15. Medtronics Inc.                        Suppllies       $83,125
PO Box 71416                             & Materials
San Juan, PR 00936

16. Nugen Group Inc.                      Contracted      $643,878
464 Calle Jose Canals                       Services
URB Roosevelt
San Juan, PR 00918

17. State Insurance Fund                     Workmen       Unknown
Corporation                             Compensation
PO Box 365028
San Juan, PR
00936-5028

18. Union General DE                      Union Dues       $67,351
Trabajadores (UGT)
611 Calle Niza
San Juan, PR 00924

19. World Financial                        Financial      $155,471
Corporation                                 Services
PO Box 364027
San Juan, PR 00936

20. Zavala Melendez                        Medical &      $289,357
Radiology, PSC                             Radiology
Caparra Heights                             Services
422 Ensenada
San Juan, PR 00920


ASSURE AFFORDABLE: Hires Maxwell Dunn as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Assure Affordable Homes, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern
Division - Detroit to hire Maxwell Dunn, PLC to serve as legal
counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will provide these services:

   (a) preparation of petition, schedules and statements and any
amendments;

   (b) preparation of client for duties while in a Chapter 11
bankruptcy;

   (c) attendance at the Initial Debtor Interview scheduled by the
Office of the U.S. Trustee, attendance at any initial status
conference as directed by the court, and attendance at the Sec. 341
meeting of creditors;

   (d) draft and preparation of first day motions, employment
applications, and other related pleadings;

   (e) attendance at the 60-day status conference and all other
hearings appurtenant to Subchapter V of Chapter 11;

   (f) management of the receipt, review, and filing of Monthly
Operating Reports and other required filings;

   (g) preparation of applications for compensation of MDPLC and
any other professionals employed by the estate;

   (h) preparation of pleadings related to sale applications or
valuation motions;

   (i) attendance at hearings and meetings not otherwise
designated;

   (j) negotiations with creditors regarding critical aspects of
the Chapter 11 proceeding and the confirmation process;

   (k) consultations with the Debtor regarding the Chapter 11
proceeding and advising the responsible party;

   (l) consultations with professionals the estate may need to
hire;

   (m) preparation of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement
and service upon creditors;

   (n) filing and representation during any adversary proceedings
that may arise; and

   (o) provide all other responsibilities and duties of counsel not
specified.

Compensation will be paid based upon the attorneys' prevailing
hourly rates, subject to court approval, plus reimbursement of
necessary expenses.

Prior to filing, the Debtor paid counsel $10,000 for prepetition
services and the $1,738 filing fee.

Maxwell Dunn, PLC is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   Alexander J. Berry-Santoro, Esq.
   MAXWELL DUNN, PLC
   2937 E. Grand Blvd., Ste. 308
   Detroit, MI 48202
   Telephone: (248) 246-1166
   E-mail: aberrysantoro@maxwelldunnlaw.com

               About Assure Affordable Homes Inc.

Assure Affordable Homes Inc. specializes in third-party real estate
management and provides professional property appraisal services.

Assure Affordable Homes Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 25-47953) on
August 7, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets up to $50,000 and estimated liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Mark A. Randon handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Alexander J. Berry-Santoro, Esq. at
MAXWELL DUNN PLC.


AVON PRODUCTS: Needs to Revise Certain Provisions of Ch. 11 Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Craig T. Goldblatt of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware concludes that certain provisions of Avon
Products Inc.'s Chapter 11 plan and confirmation order must be
revised in order to permit the plan to be confirmed.

Avon Products, Inc. and various of its affiliates filed these
bankruptcy cases in 2024. The debtors were once the owners of the
iconic Avon cosmetics brand. They spun off their U.S. assets,
however, in a 2016 transaction. During these bankruptcy cases, they
sold their foreign operations to Natura, their Brazilian parent
company. The debtors and Natura also resolved, after extensive
litigation with the Committee, various estate claims that the
debtors held against Natura. Accordingly, the debtor entities now
hold only the proceeds of those sales, insurance assets, and other
causes of action. The question now before this Court is whether the
plan of reorganization that the debtors have proposed can be
confirmed.

These bankruptcy cases were precipitated by personal injury claims
asserted against the debtors by plaintiffs who allege that their
diseases were caused by exposure to the debtors' talc-containing
cosmetic products. The debtors proposed a plan in February of this
year and this Court approved a disclosure statement in May. The
U.S. Trustee and various insurers objected to confirmation of the
plan. This Court conducted a confirmation hearing in July.

The Plan

After approval of the sale and settlement, the parties undertook
negotiations toward a plan. On Feb. 28, 2025 the debtors filed an
initial chapter 11 plan of liquidation and a proposed disclosure
statement.

The debtors' primary assets are preference and commercial tort
causes of action, rights to coverage under insurance policies, and
an anticipated $31 million in cash as of the effective date. The
plan proposes that, on the effective date, all of the debtors'
assets will vest in a liquidation trust created by the plan.
Melanie L. Cyganowski will be appointed as liquidating trustee to
administer, resolve, liquidate, and pay all claims against the
debtors. The trust is a mechanism for resolving only those claims
presented during the life of the trust, not future arising claims.
The trust will be dissolved at the earlier of five years after its
creation or when all trust assets have been depleted.

The plan establishes eight creditor classes:

   -- priority claims (class 1);
   -- secured claims (class 2);
   -- general unsecured claims (class 3);
   -- talc claims (class 4);  
   -- subordinated claims (class 5);
   -- intercompany claims (class 6);
   -- intercompany interests (class 7); and
   -- parent interests (class 8).

The plan provides that class 3 creditors can either:

   (1) recover their pro rata share of waterfall distributions from
a general unsecured claims recovery fund (which will be funded with
up to $14 million in cash), or

   (2) they can elect to receive treatment identical to class 4
talc claimants in accordance with trust distribution procedures,
and recover their pro rata share of cash proceeds from insurance
rights and retained causes of action.

The net result of this mechanism is that claimants who make the
class 3 election will recover the same percentage of the liquidated
value of their claims as class 4 talc claimants do. While this
election might (or might not) result in greater recoveries, the
payout amount and timing are uncertain.

The holders of talc claims against any or all of the debtors are
assigned to class 4. The plan provides that talc claims that were
unliquidated as of the petition date will be resolved and
liquidated in accordance with trust distribution procedures. Talc
claims that were liquidated pre-petition, whether by settlement or
pursuant to a jury verdict, will be paid as soon as practicable
from the trust.

All other talc claims will be paid out on a first-in, first-out
basis. The trust will only pay talc claims if the talc exposure,
from use of debtors' talc-cosmetic products, occurred in the United
States or the United Kingdom. Claimants' recoveries are dependent
on the proceeds from insurance coverage and those from other estate
causes of action. The debtors emphasized that nothing in the trust
distribution procedures determines whether the insurers are
obligated to pay under their policies on account of the talc
claims.

Mesothelioma talc claimants can elect to have their claims reviewed
through either the expedited review or an individual review
process. If a mesothelioma talc claimant selects the expedited
review process and provides satisfactory evidence of a mesothelioma
diagnosis and regular exposure to the debtors' cosmetic talc
products for at least three years, then the claimant will be
offered the scheduled value ($10,000) of the claim. A mesothelioma
talc claimant's allowed claim under the individual review process
will be capped at $3 million.

All other disease talc claimants will automatically proceed through
the individual review process. If the liquidating trustee
determines that the claimant has provided satisfactory evidence of
a disease diagnosis and has also established that he or she has had
no exposure to asbestos or non-debtor talc products, then the
claimant may receive an allowed claim of up to $6,000.

Claimants are not required to accept the liquidated value assigned
to their claims through these processes. The trust distribution
procedures provide that claimants may arbitrate any disputes
arising from the liquidating trustee's determination of claim
allowance or the value of their talc claims. The plan does not
contemplate, however, any access to a judicial process to determine
the allowed amount of a talc claim. A claimant's sole recourse is
to arbitration, and the task of the arbitrator will be to determine
whether the trust applied the trust distribution procedures
correctly.

Classes 3 and 4 are the only impaired classes whose members are
eligible to vote to accept or reject the plan.

The plan contains standard debtor-releases, an exculpation
provision, an injunction, and a "gatekeeping" provision. The
gatekeeping provision provides that parties may not pursue any
claims that may relate to, or are reasonably likely to relate to,
claims released or exculpated in the plan, without first requesting
a determination from the bankruptcy court that such claim was not
subject to a plan injunction and is a "colorable" claim on the
merits.

Objections

Four parties in interest asserted objections to plan confirmation
-- three groups of insurers and the U.S. Trustee. These objections
fall into five categories:

   -- the insurers argue that the plan was not proposed in good
faith;
   -- insurers challenge certain findings and particular plan
provisions on the ground that they would give the trust an improper
"leg up" in subsequent insurance coverage litigation;
   -- the insurers assert a number of other confirmation objections
that do not, on their face, relate to the treatment of their rights
under their insurance policies;
   -- the U.S. Trustee argues that the plan's proposed
reimbursement of the fees of the bond indenture trustee is
impermissible; and
   -- the U.S. Trustee contends that the "gatekeeper" provision in
the proposed plan injunction is improper.

The Court concludes that certain provisions of the plan and
confirmation order must be revised in order to permit the plan to
be confirmed. Subject to those revisions, however, the plan is
confirmable. The Court concludes that the plan has been proposed in
good faith. The evidence suggests that the debtors undertook a
process designed to treat constituencies fairly and to maximize
value for the benefit of creditors, as the Bankruptcy Code
contemplates. The Court emphasizes that there are imperfections in
the plan. For example, the provision that bars recovery from
claimants whose exposure to the debtors' products did not occur in
the United States or the United Kingdom looks to this Court like an
improper effort by certain plaintiffs' lawyers to protect their
turf. Even so, however, the totality of the evidence supports a
finding that the plan has been proposed in good faith.

The Court largely overrules the objections asserted by insurers
that relate directly to the treatment of their insurance policies,
though certain of those objections require modifications to the
terms of the plan. Broadly speaking, as far as the insurers are
concerned, the trust distribution procedures established in the
plan should be viewed as a voluntary settlement, between the talc
claimants and the debtor/trust, of talc claims. A financially
distressed company can, outside of bankruptcy (and without court
approval) enter into a settlement under materially similar economic
terms with plaintiffs who are asserting claims against it --
assigning both the claims and its insurance assets to a trust --
and wind down its business. That trust can then sue the company's
insurers, arguing that there is insurance coverage for the
settlements the trust reached with the claimants. The insurers
could respond to such a lawsuit by arguing that the trust has not
complied with the various conditions to insurance coverage, and
therefore the coverage is vitiated.

The principal point this Court intends to make is that the
respective rights of the trust (which is to be created under this
plan) and the company's insurers should be essentially the same as
they would be had this occurred out of bankruptcy. (There is an
exception for the insurers' rights to challenge the assignment of
the policies to the trust, which are preempted by Sec.
1123(a)(5)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code). To be sure, this may set up
a  high stakes and complex dispute to be resolved in insurance
coverage litigation. But that is what it is. So long as small
adjustments to the plan and confirmation order are made to comport
with the principle that the bankruptcy neither expands nor
contracts the rights of the parties, the insurer objections to the
trust distribution procedures do not provide a reason why the plan
cannot be confirmed.

The insurers raise a handful of objections that are not directly
related to their insurance policies. While the insurers' standing
to assert these objections (particularly in view of the fact that
they do not claim to be creditors in this case) is uncertain, the
Court ultimately concludes that these objections fail on the
merits. One of the 20 debtors in this case has only a single
creditor that has asserted a claim, and that creditor did not vote
on the plan. While there is a division of authority on the
question, many courts hold, as the insurers in this case argue,
that in such circumstances the class has not accepted the plan.
However, the solicitation order clearly provides that such a class
will be deemed to have accepted the plan. Whether or not the
inclusion of such language is appropriate, it was entered on notice
to all parties in interest and without objection. That order will
therefore control. The Court also rejects the insurers' argument
that the plan must comply with Sec. 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code
and their contention that the Bankruptcy Code prohibits assigning
the task of resolving unliquidated claims to a post-confirmation
liquidating trust.

The U.S. Trustee argues that the payment of indenture trustee fees
under the plan is an improper end run around Sec. 503(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code, which authorizes the payment of such fees only on
a showing that the indenture trustee made a "substantial
contribution" to the case. The Court concludes that on the facts
present in this case, the payment of the fees is fundamentally a
question of whether the plan discriminates among similarly situated
creditors. Under the Bankruptcy Code, however, unfair
discrimination is an objection that can be raised only by a class
of creditors that rejects the plan's treatment of their claims.
Because the payment of these fees was appropriately disclosed, and
all of the creditors who might be viewed as "victims" of the
discrimination voted to support the plan, this form of disparate
treatment is not a basis to deny confirmation of the plan, the
Court finds.

The plan contains a "gatekeeper" provision that bars the assertion
of any claim that could be reasonably understood to violate the
plan's exculpation provision. And any claim that falls within that
sweep may go forward only if this Court finds that the claim is
"colorable" on the merits. The Bankruptcy Code provides no
authority for such an order. The gatekeeping provision must be
removed.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated August 21, 2025, is
available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=G6QlGk from PacerMonitor.com.

                     About AIO US, Inc.

AIO US Inc., Avon Products Inc. and some of its affiliates are
manufacturers and marketers of beauty, fashion, and home products
with operations and customers across the globe.

AIO US and its affiliates sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 24-11836) on
Aug. 12, 2024. In the petition filed by Philip J. Gund as chief
restructuring officer, AIO US disclosed $1 billion to $10 billion
in assets and debt.

Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP are
counsel to the Debtors. Ankura Consulting Group LLC serves as
restructuring advisor to the Debtors. Rothschild & Co US Inc is the
Debtors' investment banker and financial advisor. Epiq Corporate
Restructuring LLC acts as claims and noticing agent to the Debtors.


BEAR'S FRUIT: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in New York
-------------------------------------------------------
On August 15, 2025, Bear's Fruit LLC filed Chapter 11 protection
in the Eastern District of New York. According to court filing,
the Debtor reports between $100,000 and $500,000 in debt owed to 1
and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.

         About Bear's Fruit LLC

Bear's Fruit LLC is a Brooklyn-based beverage manufacturer
operating in the beverage production industry (NAICS 3121). The
company, co-founded by Amy Driscoll, manufactures fruit-based
beverages and has established relationships with food distributors
including Global Natural Foods and KeHE Distributors.

Bear's Fruit LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 25-43951) on
August 15, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets up to $50,000 and estimated liabilities between $100,000 and
$500,000.

The Debtor is represented by Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP.


BETTER IS BETTER: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------
Better is Better, LLC got the green light from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to use cash
collateral.

The court authorized the Debtor's interim use of cash collateral to
fund operations until further order. The Debtor must operate within
10% of its budget.

The pre-petition liens of any creditor holding an interest in cash
collateral will continue post-petition; however, such liens shall
not exceed their value as of the commencement of the Chapter 11
case.

Replacement liens are granted solely to the extent of any
diminution in the lenders' interests in the pre-petition
collateral. The post-petition collateral specifically excludes (i)
causes of action (and their proceeds) arising under Chapter 5 of
the Bankruptcy Code, and (ii) recoveries from any claims under
Section 506(c) of the Bankruptcy Code.

A final hearing is set for September 25. Objections are due by
September 18.

Currently, there are four active UCC Financing Statements filed in
Pennsylvania that may pertain to the Debtor's cash collateral.
However, each of these statements was filed by service agents
namely Corporation Service Company and CT Corporation System
without identifying the actual creditor. As a result, it is unclear
which creditor, if any, holds a first lien on the Debtor's assets.


                 About Better is Better, LLC

Better is Better, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 25-22163) on August
19, 2025. In the petition signed by Joel Phifer, member, the Debtor
disclosed up to $100,000 in assets and up to $1 million in
liabilities.

Christopher M. Frye, Esq., at Steidl & Steinberg, P.C., represents
the Debtor as legal counsel.


BEYOND AIR: Reports $8.1M Net Loss in Quarter Ended June 30, 2025
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond Air, Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $8.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared
to a net loss of $13.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2024.

Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $1.8 million
compared to a revenue of $683 thousand for the same period in
2024.

Going Concern, Liquidity and Other Uncertainties:

The Company used cash in operating activities of $4.5 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2025, and has an accumulated
deficit attributable to the stockholders of Beyond Air, Inc. of
$294 million. The Company had cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities of $6.5 million as of June 30, 2025. In addition, $4
million of cash is held on deposit by the Company's contract
manufacturer to be applied against future purchases.

The Company expects to incur net losses and have significant cash
outflows for at least the next year, including making significant
investments in research and development. Management believes these
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to meet
its obligations with cash on hand and concluded that the Company
will require additional funding within the next 12 months.

Management is confident that the efforts to arrange financing,
while not assured, will enable the Company to meet its
obligations.

The Company's future capital needs and the adequacy of its
available funds will depend on many factors, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the success and costs of commercialization
of the Company's approved product and the actual cost and time
necessary for current and anticipated preclinical studies, clinical
trials and other actions needed to obtain certification or
regulatory approval of the Company's product candidates.

On June 2, 2025, the Company received $2 million of advanced
financing from a related party, a director of the Company who is
also an existing lender under its Loan Agreement. The Company is
currently arranging the terms and expects that such financing will
be issued on terms and conditions materially consistent with those
of the Loan Agreement.

A full-text copy of the Company's Form 10-Q is available at:

                  https://tinyurl.com/adr5pzwa

                       About Beyond Air

Headquartered in Garden City, N.Y., Beyond Air, Inc. --
www.beyondair.net -- is a commercial-stage medical device and
biopharmaceutical company developing a platform of nitric oxide
generators and delivery systems (the "LungFit platform") capable of
generating NO from ambient air. The Company's first device, LungFit
PH, received premarket approval from the FDA in June 2022. The NO
generated by the LungFit PH system is indicated to improve
oxygenation and reduce the need for extracorporeal membrane
oxygenation in term and near term (34 weeks gestation) neonates
with hypoxic respiratory failure associated with clinical or
echocardiographic evidence of pulmonary hypertension in conjunction
with ventilatory support and other appropriate agents.

East Hanover, New Jersey-based Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2024, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated June 20, 2025, attached to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2025, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has
experienced negative cash flows from operating activities since
inception, and has an accumulated deficit, that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had $28.1 million in total assets,
against $17.7 million in total liabilities.


BINYAN KOIDESH: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Binyan Koidesh LLC
        5209 13th Avenue
        2nd Floor
        Brooklyn NY 11209

Business Description: Binyan Koidesh LLC, classified as a single-
                      asset real estate debtor under 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B), holds principal assets at
                      1452 53rd Street, Brooklyn, New York 11209.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 17, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York

Case No.: 25-43407

Judge: Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord

Debtor's Counsel: Joshua R. Bronstein, Esq.
                  JOSHUA R. BRONSTEIN & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
                  114 Soundview Drive
                  Port Washington NY 11050
                  Tel: 516-698-0202
                  Email: jbrons5@yahoo.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Abraham Wieder as manager.

The Debtor failed to attach a list of its 20 largest unsecured
creditors to the petition.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/VBB7EBY/BINYAN_KOIDESH_LLC__nyebke-25-43407__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


BIOXCEL THERAPEUTICS: Fiscal Q2 Net Loss Widens to $19.2 Million
----------------------------------------------------------------
BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a
net loss of $19.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025,
compared to a net loss of $8.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2024.

Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $120 thousand,
compared to a revenue of $1.1 million for the same period in 2024.

For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a net
loss of $26.4 million, compared to a net loss of $35.1 million for
the same period in 2024.

Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $288 thousand,
compared to a revenue of $1.7 million for the same period in 2024.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and
restricted cash of $18.6 million and an accumulated deficit of
$676.6 million. The Company has incurred substantial net losses and
negative cash flows from operating activities in nearly every
fiscal period since inception, and expects this trend to continue
for the foreseeable future. The Company had net cash used in
operating activities of $24.6 million and $40.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

"We will need to generate significant product revenues to achieve
profitability. Our history of significant losses, negative cash
flows from operations, potential near-term increased
covenant-driven amortization payments or full repayment obligations
under our Credit Agreement, the regulatory event of default
triggers under the Credit Agreement, other funding requirement
covenants under the Credit Agreement, limited liquidity resources
currently on hand, and dependence on our ability to obtain
additional financing to fund our operations after the current
resources are exhausted, about which there can be no certainty,
have resulted in management's assessment that there is substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for a period
of at least 12 months from the issuance date of the financial
statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q."

Successful completion of the Company's development programs and,
ultimately, the attainment of profitable operations are dependent
upon future events, including obtaining adequate financing to
support the Company's cost structure and operating plan.
Management's plans to improve the Company's liquidity and reduce
its operating expenses and capital requirements include, among
other things, pursuing one or more of the following steps to raise
additional capital, none of which can be guaranteed or are entirely
within the Company's control:

      * raise funding through the sale of the Company's equity
securities;

      * raise funding through third-party investments in or other
strategic options for OnkosXcel;

      * raise funding through debt financing and/or restructuring
of its existing Credit Agreement;

      * establish collaborations with potential partners to advance
the Company's product pipeline;

      * establish collaborations with potential marketing
partners;

      * reduce overhead and headcount to focus on core priorities,
and/or

      * any combination of the foregoing.

"To date, we have continued research and development activities
while managing our cash position. However, we require additional
funding to continue as a going concern. There are no assurances
that we will be successful in obtaining an adequate level of
financing as and when needed to finance our operations on terms
acceptable to us or at all, particularly when there is market
uncertainty or an economic downturn or if other events make
investment in our securities less appealing. If we are unable to
secure adequate additional funding as and when needed on acceptable
or commercially reasonable terms, we may have to significantly
delay, scale back or discontinue the development and
commercialization of one or more product candidates. In addition,
there are various macro-economic trends affecting the financing
markets whose impact on our liquidity and future funding
requirements are uncertain as of the filing date of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. We will need substantial additional funding,
and if we are unable to raise capital when needed, we could be
compelled to pursue alternative options, including, without
limitation, implementing further workforce reductions, reducing or
ceasing product development programs and advancement of our
clinical trials and product candidates, selling our assets or
seeking other strategic alternatives," the Company concluded.

A full-text copy of the Company's Form 10-Q is available at:

                  https://tinyurl.com/3m8m78zr

                        About BioXcel Therapeutics

Headquartered in New Haven, Conn., BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc., is a
biopharmaceutical company utilizing artificial intelligence to
develop transformative medicines in neuroscience and, through the
Company's wholly owned subsidiary, OnkosXcel Therapeutics LLC,
immuno-oncology. The Company is focused on utilizing cutting-edge
technology and innovative research to develop high-value
therapeutics aimed at transforming patients' lives. The Company
employs various AI platforms to reduce therapeutic development
costs and potentially accelerate development timelines.

Stamford, Conn.-based Ernst & Young LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2021, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated March 28, 2025, attached to the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has used
significant cash in operations and has stated that substantial
doubt exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had $25.8 million in total assets,
against $133.5 million in total liabilities.


BISHOP OF FRESNO: Committee Gets OK to Tap Stinson LLP as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of The Roman Catholic
Bishop of Fresno received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of California, Fresno Division, to hire
Stinson LLP to serve as its legal counsel.

Stinson LLP will provide these services:

   (a) represent the Committee as its counsel on the terms and
conditions set forth in the Application, effective as of July 24,
2025;

   (b) file interim and final fee applications for allowance of
compensation and reimbursement of expenses,
subject to Sections 330 and 331 of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Bankruptcy Rules, the Bankruptcy Local Rules, the Fee Guidelines,
and any further order of the Court;

   (c) make a reasonable effort to comply with the U.S. Trustee's
request for information and additional disclosures; and

   (d) use best efforts to avoid duplication of services provided
by any of the Committee's other retained professionals in this
Chapter 11 case.

Stinson LLP will be compensated in accordance with the Bankruptcy
Code, subject to Court approval of interim and final fee
applications.

Stinson LLP is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   Robert T. Kugler
   Edwin H. Caldie, esq.
   Logan Kugler, esq.
   STINSON LLP
   50 S 6th Street, Suite 2600
   Minneapolis, MN 55402
   Telephone: (612) 335-1500
   E-mail: robert.kugler@stinson.com
           ed.caldie@stinson.com
           logan.kugler@stinson.com

          - and -  

   J. Jackson Waste
   FENNEMORE LLP
   8080 N. Palm Avenue, Third Floor
   Fresno, CA 93711
   Telephone: (559) 432-4500
   E-mail: jwaste@fennemorelaw.com

                        About The Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno

The Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno, a corporation sole, is a
California nonprofit religious organization that administers the
temporal affairs of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Fresno. It
provides leadership, support services, and resources to 87
parishes, diocesan schools, cemeteries, and Catholic-based social
and community service organizations across the diocese. Its
operations are primarily funded through parish and school
assessments, donations, grants, service fees, cemetery pre-need
sales, and investment income.

The Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno sought relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Calif. Case No. 25-12231)
on July 1, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reported between $50
million and $100 million in assets and liabilities.

Judge Rene Lastreto II handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Hagop T. Bedoyan, Esq., at McCormick,
Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, LLP. Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc. is the Debtor's claims and noticing agent.


BLOCK COMMUNICATIONS: Moody's Cuts CFR to B3 & 1st Lien Debt to Ba3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings downgraded Block Communications, Inc.'s (Block or
the Company) Corporate Family Rating to B3 from B2 and Probability
of Default Rating to B3-PD from B2-PD. Moody's also downgraded the
senior secured first lien bank credit facilities, including the
term loan B and revolving credit facility, to Ba3 from Ba2 and
downgraded the senior unsecured notes to Caa1 from B3. The outlook
changed to stable from negative.

The downgrades reflect the company's weakened liquidity and credit
metrics. Top-line declines across all segments have resulted in
reduced scale. Recent profitability improvements in the telecom,
broadcast and publishing businesses have been outpaced by EBITDA
declines in broadband and one-time corporate expenses that comprise
approximately 10% of trailing twelve month's earnings. Earnings
declines in the broadband business have primarily been driven by
the discontinuation of the ACP program, which accelerated data
subscriber losses, competition in certain regions, and ongoing
secular pressures. Year-to-date Q2 revenue fell by 7.3%
year-over-year, while adjusted EBITDA fell 6.8% over the same
period after adjusting for one-time transaction charges.

The rating action also reflects the risk that the company's
initiatives to regain lost customers and improve profitability will
not be sufficient to counteract competitive and secular headwinds
in Moody's forward views. As a result of these pressures, Moody's
expects leverage to rise to the mid 5x range by year-end 2025.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Block will
complete a near-term refinancing to extend maturities and
significantly improve the company's liquidity. The outlook also
reflects Moody's expectations for modest debt repayment following
the expected closing of the sale of the broadcast business in
mid-2026. Moody's expects a 0.7x reduction in leverage which will
offset ongoing EBITDA pressure.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Block's B3 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects the deterioration
of credit metrics and liquidity as a result of pressure across all
business segments in recent years. Although cost cutting actions
have been taken to improve year-over-year telecom, broadcast and
publishing profitability in Q2 2025, high competition in certain
regions for high-speed data, Block's largest business segment,
creates the risk for EBITDA decline. These impacts, combined with
increased interest expense upon an expected refinancing and
inherent high capital intensity, will continue to limit free cash
flow generation. Although Block has reduced capital expenditures,
Moody's believes substantial reinvestment, estimated in the
low-teen percentages of revenue, is necessary to remain
competitive. The rating is further constrained by governance risks,
as reflected in the G–4 Issuer Profile Score and CIS–4 Credit
Impact score. Ownership is highly concentrated, with the Block
family maintaining full control of the business, lacking
independent board oversight.

Supporting the credit profile is a long operating history and
family ownership, with limited shareholder-friendly transactions.
The business is also well diversified for its small scale, with its
mix of four distinct subscription-based businesses. The cable
segment, the largest contribution to revenue and EBITDA, is
supported by secular broadband demand, a competitive, high-speed
and fiber-rich network, strong market position (measured by
penetration) and profitable business model, with strong EBITDA
margins in low 40% range.

Block has weak liquidity with $10 million in cash on the balance
sheet and expected breakeven free cash flow in 2025. Availability
on its $100 million revolving credit facility (springing maturity
in 2026 with $40 million drawn) is limited to $25 million, due to a
maximum leverage covenant. Alternate sources of liquidity are
limited by its partially secured capital structure.

The senior secured first lien bank credit facilities, including the
revolver and term loan, are rated Ba3, three notches above the B3
CFR, reflecting the priority position in the collateral of
substantially all assets and upstream guarantees from direct and
indirect domestic subsidiaries. In addition, the first lien credit
facility represents a small share of total outstanding debt. The
senior unsecured notes are rated Caa1, one notch below the CFR
given its subordination to the senior secured credit facilities.
The instrument ratings reflect the probability of default of the
company, as reflected in the B3-PD Probability of Default Rating,
and an average expected family recovery rate of 50% in a default
scenario.

Moody's stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that a
near-term refinancing will materially improve the company's
liquidity position. It also incorporates the expectation for debt
reduction via proceeds from the sale of the company's broadcast
business in the first half of 2026.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be upgraded if cost-cutting measures across business
segments and improved performance in the broadband business lead to
sustainable growth in revenue and EBITDA such that leverage is
sustained below 5.25x (Moody's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA), and
retained cash flow to net debt stays above 15% (Moody's adjusted).

Ratings could be downgraded if a refinancing resulting in enhanced
liquidity is not completed in the near-term. Additionally, ratings
may face pressure if there is an accelerated decline in operating
performance, leading to leverage sustained above 6.25x (Moody's
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA).

Block Communications, Inc., founded in 1900, is a privately held,
diversified media company headquartered in Toledo, Ohio. It is
wholly-owned and controlled by the Block Family. It operates four
segments including cable television, telecommunications, newspaper
publishing, and television broadcasting. The Company's cable
operations, comprising a majority of the business, are branded
Buckeye Broadband (serving Toledo and Erie County Ohio and parts of
Southeast Michigan) and MaxxSouth serving North and Central
Mississippi and NorthWest Alabama. The Company reported revenue of
approximately $495 million for the LTM period ended June 30, 2025.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was
Telecommunications Service Providers published in November 2023.

The net effect of any adjustments applied to rating factor scores
or scorecard outputs under the primary methodology(ies), if any,
was not material to the ratings addressed in this announcement.


BOTTOMS UP: Lawrence Katz Named Subchapter V Trustee
----------------------------------------------------
The Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed Lawrence Katz of
Hirschler Fleischer, PC as Subchapter V trustee for Bottoms Up
Gentlemen's Club, LLC.

Mr. Katz will be paid an hourly fee of $665 for his services as
Subchapter V trustee and will be reimbursed for work-related
expenses incurred.

Mr. Katz declared that he is a disinterested person according to
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Subchapter V trustee can be reached at:

     Lawrence A. Katz
     Hirschler Fleischer, PC
     1676 International Drive, Suite 1350
     Tysons, VA 22102
     Email: lkatz@hirschlerlaw.com

                 About Bottoms Up Gentlemen's Club

Bottoms Up Gentlemen's Club, LLC filed a petition under Chapter 11,
Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
25-17671) on August 21, 2025, with up to $50,000 in assets and
$100,001 to $500,000 in liabilities.

Judge David E. Rice presides over the case.

Thomas Joseph Maronick, Jr., Esq. at the Law Office Of Thomas J.
Maronick Jr, LLC represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.


BP RETAIL: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------
BP Retail Partners Inc. and BP Retail TX, LLC ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee for authority
to use cash collateral and provide adequate protection.

The Debtors argue that immediate access to this cash is critical to
maintaining operations, covering payroll, insurance, utilities, and
vendor payments, and preserving business value.

The Debtors are not currently disputing the validity or extent of
secured creditors' liens but reserve the right to challenge them
later. They acknowledge the interests of several secured
creditors:

1. Citizens First Bank – Approx. $1.97M secured against BP Retail
Partners.
2. Sydmor, Inc. – Approx. $1.12M claimed against both BP Retail
Partners and BP Retail TX.
3. TAO Enterprises, Inc. – Approx. $537K secured against BP
Retail Partners.

These creditors have UCC-1 financing statements asserting interests
in accounts receivable and other assets. The Debtors propose using
cash per budget, with a 10% variance permitted. As adequate
protection, replacement liens will be granted to secured creditors,
matching their pre-petition lien status.

The Debtors seek interim and final court authorization to use cash
collateral, orders directing third parties to release funds to the
Debtors, and assurance of continued customer payment flow and
operational stability during the reorganization.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0RpVw6
from PacerMonitor.com.

                  About BP Retail Partners Inc.

BP Retail Partners Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 3:25-bk-03476) on
August 21, 2025. In the petition signed by Corey E. Robinson,
president, the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets
and liabilities.

Judge Randal S. Mashburn oversees the case.

Robert J. Gonzales, Esq., at EmergeLaw, PLC, represents the Debtor
as legal counsel.






C & S MEMORIAL: Armistead Long Named Subchapter V Trustee
---------------------------------------------------------
The Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 5 appointed Armistead Long as
Subchapter V trustee for C & S Memorial, Inc.

Mr. Long will be paid an hourly fee of $440 for his services as
Subchapter V trustee and an hourly fee of $150 for his legal
assistant. In addition, the Subchapter V trustee will receive
reimbursement for work-related expenses incurred.  

Mr. Long declared that he is a disinterested person according to
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Subchapter V trustee can be reached at:

     Armistead M. Long
     400 E. Kaliste Saloom Road
     Lafayette LA 70508
     Email: along@gamb.com
     Phone: (337) 237-0132

                       About C & S Memorial

C & S Memorial, Inc. filed a petition under Chapter 11, Subchapter
V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 25-50731) on
August 21, 2025, with $100,001 to $500,000 in assets and
liabilities.

Judge John W. Kolwe presides over the case.

H. Kent Aguillard, Esq., represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


CAMBRIDGE RIVERVIEW: Principal Loses Bid to Recover Unused Retainer
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mark J. Conway of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Pennsylvania denied Steven B. Atlass' motion for
turnover of property specifically excess retainer funds in the
bankruptcy case of Cambridge Riverview, LLC.

The Chapter 7 Trustee objected to the Motion for Turnover of
Property on the grounds that the unused retainer is property of the
estate per 11 U.S.C. Sec. 541(a)(1) for each of the jointly
administered Debtors. Atlass, the principal of the Debtors, argues
the retainer was paid by him personally and the retainer must be
returned pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 329(b)(2) and the PA Rules of
Professional Conduct.

Atlass is the sole member/manager of Cambridge Riverview, LLC and
the associated seven entities that filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy and
whose cases were later converted to Chapter 7. In his capacity as
manager, Atlass signed an engagement letter with Bresset & Santora
for the Debtors' Chapter 11 representation. The Debtors lacked
funds to pay the retainer of $11,000.00 per case so Atlass withdrew
the necessary funds from his IRA and wired the retainers directly
to B&S. The engagement letter, the Disclosure of Compensation, and
the Application for Retention reflect that the Debtors paid the
retainer fee.

After conversion of the case, B&S filed an application for
compensation. The original application indicated that the Debtors
paid B&S the retainers. After an objection by the primary secured
creditor, the application was amended by B&S to indicate the
retainer was paid by Atlass. The application was settled by a
Stipulation between the Debtors and the creditor allowing for
compensation of $59,309.74 to B&S. Pursuant to the Stipulation, the
Trustee is holding the unused retainer pending the outcome of the
Motion for Turnover.

The Court agrees with the majority view that a security retainer is
property of the debtor until earned by counsel and is therefore
property of the estate pursuant to Sec. 541(a)(1).

Atlass argues that the retainer is not the Debtors' property
because, per the PA Rules of Professional Conduct, any unused
retainer must be returned to the "source" of the payment. However,
upon review, the Rules suggest that any unused retainer must be
returned to the "client."

In the matter before the Court, B&S was paid a total retainer of
$88,000. Of that $88,000, there remains $28,990.25 being held by
the Trustee. The Court finds the pertinent documents in this case
do not support Atlass' position that the excess retainer should be
refunded to him because he was the source of that retainer.

Significantly, the Application for Approval of B&S as Counsel for
the Debtors indicates that the Debtors paid the retainers. There
was no mention of any payment by Atlass or any "refund" to Atlass.
The Court approved B&S's retention based upon the application. The
unused portion of the retainer, as a security retainer, was not
earned by B&S and, as such, remains property of the client, in this
matter -- the Debtors. There is no reason for the Court to look
beyond the documents as filed. The Court concludes the excess
retainer is property of the Debtors and, as a result, is property
of the estate pursuant to 11 USC Sec. 541(a)(1).

A copy of the Court's Memorandum dated August 18, 2025, is
available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=m8GRGZ from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About Cambridge Riverview

Cambridge Riverview, LLC filed voluntary Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 24-02216) on September 6, 2024, with up
to $50,000 in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Mark J. Conway
presided over the case.

Ronald V. Santora, Esq., at Bresset and Santora represented the
Debtor as legal counsel.

The case was converted to Chapter 7.


CAPTURE COLLECTIVE: Hires Kurt Kawafuchi as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Capture Collective, Inc. and its affiliates seek approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio to hire the
Law Offices of Kurt Kawafuchi, LLLC to serve as its special
counsel.

Mr. Kawafuchi will provide these services:

   (a) advise and represent the Debtors in matters with the Hawaii
Tax Department and ensure any remaining tax issues, returns, and
refunds are resolved;

   (b) communicate with the Hawaii Tax Department as necessary
regarding the Debtors' plan of reorganization and advise the
Debtors accordingly; and

   (c) prepare and/or oversee the preparation of remaining tax
returns as necessary and process any refunds.

Mr. Kawafuchi will receive an hourly rate of $480, plus ordinary
and customary expenses including the Hawaii 4.5% general excise
tax.

According to court filings, the Law Offices of Kurt Kawafuchi, LLLC
is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

    Kurt Kawafuchi, Esq.
    Law Offices of Kurt Kawafuchi, LLLC
    1003 Bishop Street, Suite 475
    Honolulu, HI 96813

                 About Capture Collective

Capture Collective, Inc. develops MiRAD, a high-throughput
biodosimetry diagnostic test based on microRNA biomarkers to assess
individual radiation exposure. The Company employs physiological,
biochemical, and molecular techniques to support rapid and accurate
biodosimetry in mass casualty situations. Its team includes
experienced scientists and radiation experts dedicated to advancing
emergency preparedness through innovative diagnostics. Capture
Diagnostics and Capture Diagnostics HIB01 halted their COVID-19
testing operations in May 2023.

Capture Collective and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 25-52291) on May 27, 2025. In the
petitions signed by Scott Barnes, CEO and president, Capture
Collective disclosed up to $3,470,581 in total assets and up to
$836,316 in total liabilities.

Judge John E. Hoffman Jr. oversees the case.

Carolyn J. Johnsen, Esq., at Dickinson Wright PLLC represents the
Debtors as legal counsel.


CCA CONSTRUCTION: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to December 17
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CCA Construction, Inc., asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey to extend its exclusivity periods to file a
plan of reorganization and obtain acceptance thereof to December
17, 2025 and February 17, 2026, respectively.

The Debtor explains that this case presents unique and significant
challenges that merit the extension requested herein, similar to
the complexity noted by courts in other situations. CCA's business
is complex, including equity interests in several operational
subsidiaries each with their own business needs, CCA's surety bond
exposure in the hundreds of millions of dollars, dozens of its own
employees, and a bespoke shared services program upon which its
operating subsidiaries rely.

The Debtor claims that its good faith progress since the First
Exclusivity Order towards reorganization further supports the
extension of the Exclusive Periods. While the initial exclusivity
period was necessarily focused on transitioning into chapter 11 and
operational stabilization, the time since has been marked by the
further advancement of this chapter 11 case. These milestones
reflect the deliberate, good faith, coordinated progress CCA has
made in laying the foundation for a viable and confirmable chapter
11 plan. CCA intends to continue to make good faith progress
towards confirming a plan going forward.

The Debtor asserts that it is not seeking the extension of the
Exclusivity Periods to pressure or prejudice any of its
stakeholders. On the contrary, CCA is seeking this extension to
allow it time to, among other tasks, further transparently engage
with its stakeholders, including BMLP, the DIP Lender and surety
providers, on a plan of reorganization, in light of the case
developments thus far, including the Special Committee's report and
the Examiner's report when it is filed. Allowing CCA to extend the
Exclusivity Periods without the distraction or expense of
addressing competing plans makes the most use of the Examiner's
efforts and the estate's resources, to the benefit of all
stakeholders, including BMLP.

The Debtor further asserts that it has consistently prioritized
transparency, collaboration and good faith cooperation in its
restructuring efforts and has maintained open lines of
communication with its key creditor constituencies, including BMLP.
In the interest of maintaining the value of the estate, CCA intends
to further engage with the surety providers in the plan negotiation
process regarding the treatment of their proofs of claim and surety
bonds.

Finally, terminating CCA's Exclusive Periods would likely delay a
final resolution of this case. If the Court were to deny CCA's
request for an extension of the Exclusive Periods, any party in
interest, including BMLP, who has engaged in extensive, highly
contentious litigation with CCA in the past, would be free to
propose a plan. Such a ruling would foster a chaotic environment
with no central focus and would likely cause substantial harm
CCA’s efforts to reorganize.

In addition, terminating CCA's Exclusive Periods could provide a
negative impression to CCA's stakeholders and potentially
disincentivize them from negotiating with CCA and would thereby
undermine CCA's efforts to successfully emerge from chapter 11.

Co-Counsel to the Debtor:

     DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
     M. Natasha Labovitz, Esq.
     Erica S. Weisgerber, Esq.
     Elie J. Worenklein, Esq.
     Shefit Koboci, Esq.
     66 Hudson Boulevard
     New York, NY 10001
     Telephone: (212) 909-6000
     Facsimile: (212) 909-6836
     Email: nlabovitz@debevoise.com
            eweisgerber@debevoise.com
            eworenklein@debevoise.com
            skoboci@debevoise.com

Co-Counsel to the Debtor:

     COLE SCHOTZ P.C.
     Michael D. Sirota, Esq.
     Warren A. Usatine, Esq.
     Felice R. Yudkin, Esq.
     Ryan T. Jareck, Esq.
     Court Plaza North, 25 Main Street
     Hackensack, NJ 07601
     Telephone: (201) 489-3000
     Facsimile: (201) 489-1536
     Email: msirota@coleschotz.com
            wusatine@coleschotz.com
            fyudkin@coleschotz.com
            rjareck@coleschotz.com

                             About CCA Construction

CCA Construction Inc., doing business as China Construction America
Inc., ProServ Shared Services, and Plaza Construction, was
established in 1993 as a Delaware corporation, and it is a direct
subsidiary of CSCEC Holding Company, Inc., also a Delaware
corporation. CSCEC Holding, CCA, and CCA's subsidiaries are
discrete pieces of CSCEC's broader business, which is operated by
more than 100 distinct entities located throughout the world, eight
of which are publicly traded. Together, the group of affiliated
entities makes up the largest construction company in the world,
operating in more than 100 countries and regions globally, covering
investment, development, construction engineering, survey and
design.

CCA Construction Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 24-22548) on December 22,
2024. In the petition filed by Yan Wei, chairman and chief
executive officer, the Debtor reports reports estimated assets
between $100 million and $500 million and estimated liabilities
between $1 billion and $10 billion.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Christine M. Gravelle handles the case.

The Debtor tapped M. Natasha Labovitz, Esq., Sidney P. Levinson,
Esq., Elie J. Worenklein, Esq., and Rory B. Heller, Esq., at
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, in New York as general bankruptcy
counsel; Michael D. Sirota, Esq., Ryan T. Jareck, Esq., Warren A.
Usatine, Esq., and Felice R. Yudkin, Esq., at Cole Schotz PC in
Hackensack, New Jersey as bankruptcy co-counsel; and BDO Consulting
Group, LLC as financial advisor. Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC,
dba Verita Global, is the administrative advisor.


CHEZ JOEY: Lawrence Katz Named Subchapter V Trustee
---------------------------------------------------
The Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed Lawrence Katz of
Hirschler Fleischer, PC as Subchapter V Trustee for Chez Joey,
LLC.

Mr. Katz will be paid an hourly fee of $665 for his services as
Subchapter V trustee and will be reimbursed for work-related
expenses incurred.

Mr. Katz declared that he is a disinterested person according to
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Subchapter V trustee can be reached at:

     Lawrence A. Katz
     Hirschler Fleischer, PC
     1676 International Drive, Suite 1350
     Tysons, VA 22102
     Email: lkatz@hirschlerlaw.com

                       About Chez Joey LLC

Chez Joey, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 25-17669) on August 21,
2025, with up to $50,000 in assets and $500,001 to $1 million in
liabilities.

Judge David E. Rice presides over the case.

Thomas Joseph Maronick, Jr., Esq., at the Law Office Of Thomas J.
Maronick Jr, LLC represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.


CLAIRE'S HOLDINGS: Pachulski Stang Represents Elliott and Monarch
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The law firm of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP ("PSZ&J") filed a
verified statement pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure to disclose that in the Chapter 11 cases of
Claire's Holdings LLC and its affiliates, the firm represents:

1. Elliott Investment Management L.P.
   360 S. Rosemary Avenue, 18th Floor
   West Palm Beach, FL 33401
   * Priority Term Loan: $26,770,385
   * Existing Term Loan: $224,101,151
   * Common Shares: 310,362
   * Preferred Shares: 362,433

2. Monarch Alternative Capital LP
   535 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor
   New York, NY 10022
   * Priority Term Loan: $51,915,980
   * Existing Term Loan: $42,668,782
   * Common Shares: 151,590
   * Preferred Shares: 185,304

PSZ&J represents Elliott Investment Management L.P., as investment
manager on behalf of certain investment funds and/or related
entities, and Monarch Alternative Capital LP, as investment manager
on behalf of certain investment funds and/or related entities
(collectively, "Elliott and Monarch").

PSZ&J represents Elliott and Monarch in their respective capacities
as: (i) lenders under that certain Priority Term Loan Credit
Agreement, dated as of September 23, 2024 (as amended, the
"Priority Term Loan Credit Agreement"), by and among Claire's
Holdings LLC, as the parent guarantor, Claire's Boutiques, Inc., as
borrower, certain financial institutions party thereto from time to
time as lenders, and Ankura Trust Company LLC, as administrative
and collateral agent; (ii) lenders under that certain Term Loan
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2019 (as amended, the
"Existing Term Loan Credit Agreement"), by and among Claire's
Holdings LLC, as the parent guarantor, Claire's Stores, Inc., as
borrower, certain financial institutions party thereto from time to
time as lenders, and Ankura Trust Company, LLC, as administrative
and collateral agent; and (iii) holders of certain equity
interests.

PSZ&J does not represent or purport to represent any other entities
in connection with these chapter 11 cases. PSZ&J does not represent
Elliott and Monarch as a "committee" and does not undertake to
represent the interests of, and is not a fiduciary for, any
creditor, party in interest, or other entity that has not signed a
retention agreement with PSZ&J. Elliott and Monarch do not
represent the interests of, and do not act as a fiduciary for, any
person or entity other than themselves in connection with these
chapter 11 cases.

The law firm can be reached at:

     PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
     Laura Davis Jones, Esq.
     Jeffrey H. Davidson, Esq.
     Gabriel I. Glazer, Esq.
     Edward A. Corma, Esq.
     919 North Market Street, 17th Floor
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Telephone: (302) 652-4100
     Facsimile: (302) 652-4400
     Email: ljones@pszjlaw.com
            jdavidson@pszjlaw.com
            gglazer@pszjlaw.com
            ecorma@pszjlaw.com

                        About Claire's Holdings

Claire's Holdings LLC is a fully integrated, global fashion brand
powerhouse committed to inspiring self-expression through the
creation and delivery of exclusive, well-curated products and
experiences. Through its global brands, Claire's and Icing, the
company delivers an immersive, omnichannel shopping experience with
owned and concession stores throughout North America and Europe as
well as around the world. On the Web: http://www.claires.com/   

On August 6, 2025, Claire's Holdings LLC and certain of its U.S.
and Gibraltar-based subsidiaries, the operator of Claire's and
ICING stores globally, commenced Chapter 11 proceedings in the
United States Bankruptcy Court in the District of Delaware.  The
cases are pending before the Honorable Judge Brendan L. Shannon and
the Debtors have requested joint administration (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 25-11454).

In parallel, Claire's Canadian subsidiary commenced a proceeding in
the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial Division) under
the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act to monetize the Company's
Canadian assets under the protections offered by the CCAA.  KSV
Restructuring Inc. is the monitor in the CCAA case.

Claire's and ICING locations outside of North America are not
included in the Chapter 11 or CCAA proceedings.

Claire's listed $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and
liabilities.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal counsel to Claire's.
Houlihan Lokey is serving as investment banker, and Alvarez &
Marsal is serving as restructuring advisor.  Osler, Hoskin &
Harcourt LLP is serving as Canadian legal counsel to Claire's. Omni
Agent Solutions LLC is the claims agent.

Ankura Trust Company, LLC, as Prepetition Priority Term Loan Agent
and Prepetition Existing Term Loan Agent, is represented by:

Joel Moss, Esq.
Amit Trehan. Esq.
Sean Tierney, Esq.
Cahill Gordon & Reindell LLP
Email: JMoss@cahill.com
       ATrehan@cahill.com
       STierney@cahill.com

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Prepetition ABL Agent, is represented
by:

Elisha D. Graff, Esq.
Zachary J. Weiner, Esq.
Sean Lee, Esq.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Email: egraff@stblaw.com
       zachary.weiner@stblaw.com
       sean.lee@stblaw.com

                   -and-

L. Katherine Good, Esq.
Jeremy Ryan, Esq.
Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
Email: lkgood@potteranderson.com
       jryan@potteranderson.com)


CLB TRUCKING: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------
CLB Trucking, Inc asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Pennsylvania for authority to use cash collateral and
provide adequate protection.

The Debtor needs to use cash collateral to fund ongoing operations
and preserve the business as a going concern.

The Debtor's liabilities consist primarily of equipment leases and
unsecured debts. As part of its reorganization efforts, the Debtor
needs access to its incoming and existing cash flows, which are
currently subject to liens by secured creditors.

Two creditors have asserted security interests in the Debtor's
assets, including cash:

1. Samson MCA, LLC, which holds a first priority lien perfected by
a UCC-1 financing statement filed on July 25, 2024.
2. BMO Bank, N.A., which holds a second priority lien, perfected by
a UCC-1 filed on August 20, 2024. The security interest covers
vehicles, attachments, and all cash and non-cash proceeds.

The Debtor requests permission to use all current and incoming cash
collateral, including proceeds from accounts, subject to adequate
protection payments made to the secured creditors, including Samson
MCA and BMO Bank, in line with the forthcoming Chapter 11 plan.

A hearing on the matter is set for September 23.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=kr3O5B
from PacerMonitor.com.

                      About CLB Trucking Inc.

CLB Trucking, Inc., based in Greensburg, Pennsylvania, provides
interstate trucking services specializing in the transport of
metals, coal, asphalt, and dry bulk commodities.  The Company
operates a fleet of trucks and trailers to serve industrial clients
in the region and beyond.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 25-22144) on August 15,
2025. In the petition signed by Traci L. Peters, owner, the Debtor
disclosed up to $500,000 in assets and up to $10 million in
liabilities.

Brian C. Thompson, Esq., at Thompson Law Group, P.C., represents
the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.





COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Virginia
----------------------------------------------------------------
On August 24, 2025, Collective Investment Holdings 5 LLC filed
Chapter 11 protection in the Eastern District of Virginia.
According to court filing, the Debtor reports between $100,000 and
$500,000 in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states
funds will be available to unsecured creditors.

         About Collective Investment Holdings 5 LLC

Collective Investment Holdings 5 LLC is a  Virginia-based real
estate company operating in the Fairfax area.

Collective Investment Holdings 5 LLC sought relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 25-11741) on
August 24, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets between $500,000 and $1 million and $100,000 and $500,000.

The Debtor is represented by Martin C. Conway, Esq. at Conway Law
Group, PC.


CONGOLEUM CORP: Court Says BIW Not Liable for Environmental Claims
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeal styled In re: CONGOLEUM CORPORATION, et al., Debtors,
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION, Appellant, No. 23-1295 (3rd Cir.),
Judges Michael Chagares, Paul Matey and Cindy K. Chung of the
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed the
judgment of the United States District Court for the District of
New Jersey that reversed the decision of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey granting Bath Iron
Works Corporation's motion to reopen the bankruptcy case of
Congoleum Corporation and holding that Occidental Chemical
Corporation could not recover against BIW for certain environmental
claims.

This case arises out of the decades-long bankruptcy proceedings of
debtor Congoleum Corporation.

Congoleum's various predecessors have operated a flooring business,
the Congoleum Flooring Business, in Kearny, New Jersey, since 1886.
The Congoleum Flooring Business manufactured products that
contained asbestos, and by 2003, nearly one hundred thousand
asbestos-related personal injury claims had forced Congoleum into
bankruptcy.

One of Congoleum's creditors, Occidental Chemical Corporation,
filed a lawsuit against appellant Bath Iron Works Corporation,
Congoleum's former corporate sibling, over certain environmental
claims stemming from the operation of a manufacturing facility in
Kearny,  New Jersey. In response, BIW moved to reopen Congoleum's
bankruptcy case and for a declaration that, according to the order
confirming Congoleum's plan of reorganization, BIW was not liable
for the environmental claims.

Congoleum first filed a bankruptcy petition in 2003. Occidental did
not file a proof of claim, but its indemnitor filed a claim and
entered a notice of appearance on Occidental's behalf. As part of
the 2003 bankruptcy proceedings, Congoleum and one of its insurers,
Century Indemnity Company, reached a settlement through which
Century agreed to buy back its insurance policies from Congoleum in
exchange for an injunction barring any future claims under those
policies. Proceeds from this and similar settlements were used to
help Congoleum emerge from bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Court
approved the Century Settlement after the motion to approve the
settlement and accompanying documents were served on certain
creditors.

Congoleum filed for bankruptcy a second time in 2020, and a new
bankruptcy judge presided over the second bankruptcy case. BIW
filed an adversary proceeding against Congoleum in the second
bankruptcy case and sought a declaration that Congoleum was bound
by the BIW Finding and thus barred from claiming that BIW inherited
the Congoleum Flooring Business's liabilities, including its
environmental liabilities. The Bankruptcy Court granted BIW's
motion for summary judgment and held that, under the BIW Finding,
BIW was not responsible for the liabilities of the Congoleum
Flooring Business. The Bankruptcy Court also held that the BIW
Finding had been "actually litigated" and was necessary to both the
Century Settlement and the Confirmation Order. App. 1627. Based on
the Bankruptcy Court's ruling, Congoleum agreed in June 2021 to
dismiss its claim in the DVL litigation that BIW was responsible
for any environmental liabilities arising out of the operation of
the Kearny facility.

The Bankruptcy Court granted the motion to reopen the 2003
bankruptcy case and held that the BIW Finding bound Occidental. The
Bankruptcy Court determined that it could properly reopen the case
because it, not the District Court, was best positioned to
interpret the BIW Finding. It rejected Occidental's argument that
BIW had waited too long to file its motion because it filed
promptly after Occidental made clear that it would not agree to
dismiss its complaint. It held that the BIW Finding was not an
improper third-party release that violated the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"),
U.S.C. Sec. 9601 et seq., but rather a determination regarding
BIW's liability that was necessary to the Century Settlement. The
Bankruptcy Court also held that the Confirmation Order had res
judicata effect and bound Occidental, which had received notice of
and was a party to the confirmation proceedings. It further found
that it was more likely than not that Occidental received adequate
notice of the motion to approve the Century Settlement.

On appeal, the District Court reversed. The District Court held
that it, not the Bankruptcy Court, was best suited to interpret the
Confirmation Order because the Confirmation Order had been issued
by a district court judge, and the District Court was already
presiding over a separate dispute among Occidental, BIW, and
Congoleum regarding environmental contamination at the Kearny
facility. It also concluded that the Bankruptcy Court lacked
jurisdiction because the motion did not affect the Debtor's estate.
The District Court further held that the Bankruptcy Court erred in
finding that there was good cause to reopen the bankruptcy case
because the Debtor's estate would not be affected, the issues
raised in BIW's motion were pending in Occidental's lawsuit against
BIW, and the motion was filed more than a decade after the case was
closed. The District Court additionally determined that the BIW
Finding was a third-party release that violated CERCLA. It also
held that the Bankruptcy Court erred as both a matter of law and
fact in determining that the Confirmation Order had res judicata
effect and bound Occidental because, inter alia, Occidental had not
received adequate notice.

BIW then appealed the District Court's reversal.

According to the Circuit Judges, "The Bankruptcy Court properly
exercised its jurisdiction and did not abuse its discretion in
granting BIW's motion to reopen the case and interpret the
Confirmation Order. The Bankruptcy Court had subject matter
jurisdiction because the resolution of the dispute regarding the
BIW Finding's effect was a core proceeding, and the District Court
had not withdrawn the 2010 order of reference to the Bankruptcy
Court. The Bankruptcy Court did not err in granting the motion
because resolution of the instant dispute required a detailed
analysis of that order, and BIW's motion was timely filed."

The panel concludes, "The Bankruptcy Court did not err in
exercising its jurisdiction to reopen the bankruptcy case because
it was asked to interpret and enforce the Confirmation Order, which
was entered by a court sitting in bankruptcy. Because the BIW
Finding conclusively determined that BIW did not inherit the
liabilities of the Congoleum Flooring Business and was a final
order binding Occidental, which had notice of the confirmation and
Century Settlement proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court also did not
err in holding that the BIW Finding barred Occidental's claims
against BIW. For the foregoing reasons, we will reverse the
judgment of the District Court."

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated August 22, 2025, is available
at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=kYtADL

Counsel for Appellant Bath Iron Works Corporation:

Ian H. Gershengorn, Esq.
Illyana A. Green, Esq.
Matthew Hellman, Esq.
JENNER & BLOCK
1099 New York Avenue NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20001
E-mail: igershengorn@jenner.com
        igreen@jenner.com

Michael A. Doornweerd, Esq.
Catherine L. Steege, Esq.
JENNER & BLOCK
353 N Clark Street, Suite 4500
Chicago, IL 60654
E-mail: mdoornweerd@jenner.com
        csteege@jenner.com

Lawrence Bluestone, Esq.
Angelo J. Genova, Esq.
GENOVA BURNS
494 Broad Street
Newark, NJ 07102
E-mail: lbluestone@genovaburns.com
        agenova@genovaburns.com

Donald W. Clarke, Esq.
Daniel M. Stolz, Esq.
GENOVA BURNS
110 Allen Road, Suite 304
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920
E-mail: dclarke@genovaburns.com
        dstolz@genovaburns.com

Haley B. Zoffer, Esq.
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE
350 S Grand Avenue, Suite 2700
Los Angeles, CA 90071
E-mail: haleyzoffer@dwt.com

Counsel for Appellee Occidental Chemical Corporation:

Erin E. Murphy, Esq.
CLEMENT & MURPHY
706 Duke Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
E-mail: erin.murphy@clementmurphy.com

Amanda L. Rauer, Esq.
David E. Romine, Esq.
Larry D. Silver, Esq.
LANGSMAN STEVENS SILVER & HOLLAENDER
1818 Market Street, Suite 2430
Philadelphia, PA 19103
E-mail: dromine@lssh-law.com
        lsilver@lssh-law.com

Russell C. Silberglied, Esq.
RICHARDS LAYTON & FINGER
One Rodney Square
920 N King Street
Wilmington, DE 19801
E-mail: silberglied@rlf.com

                      About Congoleum Corp.

Congoleum Corporation -- https://www.congoleum.com/ -- manufactures
and sells vinyl sheet and tile products for both residential and
commercial markets. Its products are used in remodeling,
manufactured housing, new construction, commercial applications,
and recreational vehicles. Congoleum was started in 1828, in
Kirkaldy, Scotland, as a manufacturer of heavy canvas sailcloth,
sold to manufacturers of floorcloth, which was a precursor to
linoleum.

The Company first filed for Chapter 11 protection on Dec. 31, 2003
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 03-51524) to resolve claims asserted
against it related to the use of asbestos in its products decades
prior. Congoleum's reorganization plan became effective as of July
1, 2010. By operation of the reorganization plan, American
Biltrite's ownership interest in Congoleum was eliminated and new
shares in Congoleum were issued to certain of Congoleum's
prepetition creditors.  Richard L. Epling, Esq., Robin L. Spear,
Esq., and Kerry A. Brennan, Esq., at Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP, and Paul S. Hollander, Esq., and James L. DeLuca,
Esq., at Okin, Hollander & DeLuca, LLP, represented the Debtors.

Congoleum Corporation again sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 20-18488) on July 13,
2020. The petition was signed by Christopher O'Connor, the CEO and
president. The Debtor was estimated to have $50 million to $100
million in assets and $100 million to $500 million in liabilities.

The Honorable Michael B. Kaplan presided over the 2020 case. In the
2020 case, Warren A. Usatine, Esq., Felice R. Yudkin, Esq., and
Rebecca W. Hollander, Esq. of Cole Schotz P.C., served as counsel
to the Debtor. B. Riley FBR, Inc. served as financial advisor and
investment banker to the Debtor; and Phoenix Management Services,
LLC, as financial advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC was the claims and
noticing agent.  

                          *     *     *

In October 2020, the Debtors won court approval to sell
substantially all assets to Congoleum Acquisition, LLC, an entity
formed by the noteholder group. The sale provided at least $53
million of consideration to the Debtor's estate consisting of (i)
$28.5 million credit bid, (ii) satisfaction of the outstanding
liability to the DIP Lender totaling approximately $10 million at
closing, (iii) payment of cure costs estimated at $1.3 million,
(iv) assumption of postpetition accounts payable estimated at $1.5
million, (v) payment at closing or assumption of claims pursuant to
Section 503(b)(9) estimated at $800,000,(vi) assumption of
liabilities under a capital lease with VFI estimated at $4.5
million, (vii) assumption (if consented to by the Small Business
Association) of the PPP loan in the amount of$5.7 million, (viii)
assumption of deferred FICA taxes estimated at $640,000 and (ix)
liabilities associated with employee health plan at $150,000. In
addition, in connection with the sale, the buyer, Creditors'
Committee and holders of the Senior Secured Notes entered into a
settlement that provides for consideration to the estate of up to
$1.3 million in addition to the $100,000 in Excluded Cash as
follows: (i) $250,000 on or about the effective date of the Plan;
(ii) $250,000 on or about 6 months after the closing of the sale;
(iii) $500,000 on or about 12 months after closing of the sale;
(iv) $300,000 if and when certain monies presently held in a cash
collateral account by Applied Underwriters for a period when the
Debtor was self-insured for workers' compensation claims are
refunded. The settlement also provides consideration to the
Debtor's estate if the buyer sells the company within five years of
closing of the sale.

A Chapter 11 plan was confirmed in the case on January 11, 2021.



CRANE ENTERPRISES: Court Upholds Cranes' Eviction
-------------------------------------------------
In the adversary proceeding captioned as CRANE ENTERPRISES, LLC,
Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL E. CRANE, DANIEL M. CRANE, JOHN DOE AND JANE
DOE (Fictitious Persons), Defendants, Adv. Pro. No. 25-01040
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y.), the Honorable David S. Jones of the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
denied the Motion of Michael E. Crane and Daniel M. Crane for:

   (I) an order, pursuant to Rule 9023 or, in the alternative, Rule
9024 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, to alter, amend
or grant relief from the order granting summary judgment against
Michael E. Crane and Daniel M. Crane, or, in the alternative,
  
  (II) an order pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8007 for a stay pending
the appeal of the summary judgment and order and the November 18,
2024 state court order.

The Defendants "seek to alter or amend" the Bankruptcy Court's
decision granting the Debtor-Plaintiff's motion for summary
judgment regarding turnover of the Debtor's property entered on
July 29, 2025 and subsequent order granting summary judgment
against the Defendants, or in the alternative, a stay of the
Decision and Order as well as a stay of the November 18, 2024
decision (the "Eviction Decision") and judgment entered on November
23, 2024 issued by the Nassau County district court in the state
court eviction proceedings in favor of the Plaintiff. The
Defendants had also separately filed a notice of appeal of the
Decision and Order. The Decision and Order held that the Defendants
have no valid ongoing leasehold or other interest in the apartment
located at 360 Shore Road, Apt 8L, Long Beach, NY 11561, and that
Plaintiff is entitled to turnover of the Property.

The Defendants contend that:

   (1) the Bankruptcy Court improperly concluded that Daniel Crane
is bound by the Eviction Decision and Eviction Order brought
against his father Michael Crane in the Eviction Action, arguing
instead that New York law prohibits enforcement of that order
against Daniel Crane;
   (2) Daniel Crane is not collaterally estopped from litigating
his rights under the alleged lifetime $1.00 per year lease for the
Property; and
   (3) the Alleged Lease is enforceable and not void under New York
law.

The Debtor-Plaintiff filed an objection to the Reconsideration/Stay
Motion In addition, the Debtor-Plaintiff filed a motion for further
relief in aid of its turnover application (the "Eviction Motion").

The Court finds the Defendants fail to meet their burden under
Rules 59 and 60. According to the Bankruptcy Court, Defendants do
not point to any intervening change of controlling law, new
evidence, or a need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest
injustice.

Issues concerning the validity of the Alleged Lease and
enforceability of the Eviction Decision and Eviction Order were
already litigated to a final judgment and order and the Bankruptcy
Court made its determination that the judgment deserves preclusive
effect as applied to both Defendants under principles of collateral
estoppel, certainly in the context of the issue before this Court
-- whether Debtor is entitled to turnover of its property pursuant
to Section 542 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court
determined that collateral estoppel bound both Defendants to the
Eviction Decision even though Daniel Crane was not named in the
Eviction Action because  the Alleged Lease explicitly lists Daniel
and Michael Crane as co-tenants, and the two Cranes were
identically situated and possessed identical rights under the
Alleged Lease, which the District Court concluded was invalid. It
would be inappropriate at this stage for the Bankruptcy Court to
hear re-litigation of old issues decided by the state court or
consider new theories of the case.

The Defendants also argue that they will suffer "substantial,
immediate harm" if the Bankruptcy Court does not stay enforcement
of the Decision and Order and contend that their appeal of the
Eviction Decision and Eviction Order will be moot if Defendants are
evicted from the apartment.  Michael Crane's sworn declaration
states that the Property is his and Daniel's "primary and sole
residence" and that they would be rendered "homeless" by an
eviction.

The Bankruptcy Court finds that any harm to the Defendants caused
by the Court's Decision and Order is not "irreparable harm" in
light of their circumstances, and because, if the Eviction Decision
were to be overturned on appeal, the Defendants "could be
compensated in the form of monetary damages for the costs
associated with being forced to move out of the Property.
Additionally, Defendant's contention that denial of a stay risks
mooting their appeal of the Eviction Decision is unavailing.

The Defendants assert that they are "ready, willing, and able" to
pay the Debtor's postpetition fees for the Property, "including
payment of its carry costs such as insurance, cooperative fees and
assessments, and other maintenance costs associated" with the
Property. Notably, the Defendants do not offer to cure outstanding
prepetition arrears associated with the Property. Even more
pointedly, adopting the approach proposed by the Cranes -- that the
Bankruptcy Court allow them to continue to inhabit the Property
while their appeal winds its way through the state-court appellate
process -- would indefinitely delay Debtor's ability to sell the
Property for any reasonable price, thus prejudicially thwarting
Debtor's efforts to secure prompt and commercially appropriate
revenue from its Property, for the benefit of stakeholders who may
ultimately include Michael Crane. According to the Bankruptcy
Court, on this record, granting a stay would prejudice the estate
and its creditors by delaying distributions without offsetting
benefit.

Therefore, the Bankruptcy Court denies the Reconsideration/Stay
Motion, and grants the Eviction Motion in part by providing an
eviction remedy with U.S. Marshals Service assistance if necessary,
and denies it in part insofar as it seeks an immediate ruling that
Michael and Daniel Crane are in contempt of court, or sanctions for
their assertedly contumacious behavior.

A copy of the Court's decision dated August 20, 2025, is available
at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=D1Gg4D from PacerMonitor.com.

Special Litigation Counsel for the Debtor:

Eric J. Snyder, Esq.
WILK AUSLANDER LLP
825 Eighth Avenue, Suite 2900
New York, NY 10019
E-mail: esnyder@wilkauslander.com

Co-Counsel to Michael E. Crane and Daniel M. Crane, Defendants:

Douglas A. Goldstein, Esq.
LAW ADVOCATES LLC
236 Millbrook Ave, Suite 3R
Randolph, NJ 07869
E-mail: DGoldstein@Advocates.Esq

Co-Counsel to Michael E. Crane and Daniel M. Crane, Defendants:

Brian J. Hufnagel, Esq.
Lawrence F. Morrison, Esq.
MORRISON TENENBAUM PLLC
87 Walker Street, Floor 2
New York, NY 10013
E-mail: bjhufnagel@m-t-law.com

                   About Crane Enterprises LLC

Crane Enterprises LLC filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
25-10405) on March 4, 2025, listing $500,001 to $1 million in
assets and $100,001 to $500,000 in liabilities.

Judge David S Jones handles the case.

Brett Silverman, Esq., at Silverman Law PLLC represents the Debtor
as counsel.


CROSS TOWN: Gets Court OK to Use Cash Collateral Until Feb. 28
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon granted Cross
Town Movers, Inc.'s motion to use cash collateral to fund
operations until February 28, 2026.

The court authorized the Debtor to use cash collateral in
accordance with its budget, which covers the period from August 25,
2025 to February 28, 2026.

As adequate protection for the Debtor's use of their cash
collateral, secured creditors will receive replacement liens on all
post-petition assets similar to their pre-bankruptcy collateral.

In case of any diminution in the value of their collateral, the
secured creditors will receive administrative claims under Section
503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, which will have priority over, and
be senior to, all other administrative claims against the estate.

The secured creditors are the U.S. Small Business Administration,
OnDeck, NewCo Funding, Silverline Funding, PayPal/Loan Builder,
Kalamata Funding, Meged Funding, and Diesel Funding.

The Debtor's right to use cash collateral will continue until the
earlier of February 28, 2026; a default and failure to cure by the
Debtor; dismissal or conversion to a case under Chapter 7; or
further order of the court.

A copy of the court's order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://shorturl.at/BrhfV from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About Cross Town Movers Inc.

Cross Town Movers Inc. provides residential and commercial moving
and storage services across Oregon, including Eugene, Salem,
Medford, and coastal areas. The Company offers local,
long-distance, and interstate relocations, as well as packing,
crating, and climate-controlled storage. It operates as an agent of
Bekins Van Lines.

Cross Town Movers Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ore. Case No. 25-61950) on July 11,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports total assets of
$2,088,644 and total liabilities of $3,185,751.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Thomas M. Renn handles the case.

The Debtors are represented by Loren S. Scott, Esq. at THE SCOTT
LAW GROUP.


CUSTOM CONCRETE: Unsecureds Will Get 10% of Claims over 5 Years
---------------------------------------------------------------
Custom Concrete Solutions, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania a Small Business
Plan of Reorganization dated August 18, 2025.

The is a Pennsylvania business engaged in construction. The Debtor
is incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and is operated
on a day to day basis by Mr. Leech.

The Debtor commenced operations in 2013. Debtor has fallen behind
on equipment loans taken out during a slow down in business during
the COVID pandemic when debtor struggled to find and retain
employees.

The Plan proposes to pay the Debtor's creditors from, cash flow
from operations.

The Plan proposes to pay administrative and priority claims in full
unless otherwise agreed. The Debtor estimates approximately 10%
will be paid on account of general unsecured claims pursuant to the
Plan.

Class 4 consists of General Unsecured Claims. This Class will
receive a distribution of 10% of their allowed claims. This Class
is impaired. The Debtor's Allowed General Unsecured Claims and
their proposed treatment under the Plan:

     * CellCo Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless with a claim
amount of $1,025.14. Paid pro rata from the funds designated for
the general unsecured pool. A total distribution to unsecured
creditors in the amount of $102.50 is anticipated over a period of
5 years with annual distributions of $20.50 to be made by debtor.

     * The U.S. Small Business Administration with a claim amount
of $436,060.69. Paid pro rata from the funds designated for the
general unsecured pool. A total distribution to unsecured creditors
in the amount of $43,606.00 is anticipated over a period of 5 years
with annual distributions of $8,721.20 to be made by debtor.

     * Pennsylvania Turnpike Administration with a claim amount of
$41,650.00. Paid pro rata from the funds designated for the general
unsecured pool. A total distribution to unsecured creditors in the
amount of $4,165.00 is anticipated over a period of 5 years with
annual distributions of $833.00 be made by debtor.

     * Platinum Service Center with a claim amount of $18,000.00.
Paid pro rata from the funds designated for the general unsecured
pool. A total distribution to unsecured creditors in the amount of
$1,800.00 is anticipated over a period of 5 years with annual
distributions of $360.00 to be made by debtor.

     * Robert Bruener with a claim amount of $6,000.00. Paid pro
rata from the funds designated for the general unsecured pool. A
total distribution to unsecured creditors in the amount of $600.00
is anticipated over a period of 5 years with annual distributions
of $120.00 to be made by debtor.

     * WC Rasely Resellers, Inc. with a claim amount of $3,500.00.
Paid pro rata from the funds designated for the general unsecured
pool. A total distribution to unsecured creditors in the amount of
$350.00 is anticipated over a period of 5 years with annual
distributions of $70.00 to be made by debtor.

The Debtor's plan of reorganization will be funded from the
debtor's business income.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated August 18,
2025 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=fMLcDD from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Brian C. Thompson, Esq.
     Thompson Law Group, P.C.
     301 Smith Drive, Suite 6
     Cranberry Township, PA 16066
     (724) 799-8404 Telephone
     (724) 799-8409 Facsimile
     E-mail: bthompson@thompsonattorney.com

                  About Custom Concrete Solutions

Custom Concrete Solutions, LLC is a Pennsylvania business engaged
in construction.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 25-21226) on May 12,
2025.  In the petition signed by Matt Leech, managing member, the
Debtor disclosed $500,000 in assets and $1 million in liabilities.

Judge Gregory L. Taddonio oversees the case.

Brian C. Thompson, Esq., at Thompson Law Group, P.C., is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


DATAVAULT AI: EOS Technology and CEO Bradley Hold 9.9% Stake
------------------------------------------------------------
Nathaniel Bradley, Sonia Choi, and EOS Technology Holdings Inc.
disclosed in a Schedule 13D (Amendment No. 2) filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of August 8, 2025, they
beneficially own an aggregate of 9,645,952 shares of Datavault AI
Inc.'s common stock, $0.0001 par value per share.

     * Nathaniel Bradley beneficially owns 9,645,952 shares,
consisting of 4,265,361 shares held directly, 2,399,911 shares held
by EOS Technology Holdings Inc., and 2,980,680 shares held directly
by his spouse, Sonia Choi.
     * Sonia Choi beneficially owns 7,246,041 shares, including
2,980,680 shares held directly and 4,265,361 shares held by Mr.
Bradley.
     * EOS Technology Holdings Inc. beneficially owns 2,399,911
shares held directly.

Collectively, these holdings represent 9.9% of the class, based on
97,692,374 shares outstanding as of July 30, 2025.

Nathaniel Bradley, Sonia Choi, and EOS Technology Holdings Inc. may
be reached through:

     Nathaniel Bradley
     Chief Executive Officer & Sole Director
     EOS Technology Holdings Inc.
     48 Wall Street, Floor 11
     New York, NY 10005
     Phone: 520-631-9595

A full-text copy of Nathaniel Bradley's SEC report is available
at:

              https://tinyurl.com/futtzz6c

                        About Datavault AI


Datavault AI Inc. (f/k/a WiSA Technologies, Inc.) --
www.wisatechnologies.com -- develops and markets spatial audio
wireless technology for smart devices and home entertainment
systems. The Company's WiSA Association collaborates with consumer
electronics companies, technology providers, retailers, and
industry partners to promote high-quality spatial audio
experiences. WiSA E is the Company's proprietary technology for
seamless integration across platforms and devices.

San Jose, California-based BPM LLP, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
March 31, 2025, attached to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, citing that the
Company's recurring losses from operations, a net capital
deficiency, available cash and cash used in operations raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company had $120.7 million in total
assets, against $46.6 million in total liabilities.


DEDICATION & EVERLASTING: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
Todd A. Frealy, the Chapter 11 trustee for Dedication & Everlasting
Love To Animals (D.E.L.T.A. Rescue), asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California, Los Angeles Division, to
use cash collateral on an interim basis from September 1 to
December 31.

The trustee emphasizes that use of cash collateral is necessary to
pay essential post-petition operating expenses. A proposed budget
outlines the anticipated expenses, and the trustee seeks
flexibility to deviate by up to 15% in the aggregate from that
budget.

The Debtor operates what it claims is the world's largest "No Kill,
Care-for-Life" animal sanctuary, currently housing approximately
1,200 animals. The organization derives nearly all of its income
from charitable donations and also generates revenue through
dividends from its investments. As of mid-August, the trustee had
access to approximately $1.66 million in cash, excluding investment
accounts held at Merrill Lynch, which were valued at over $12.8
million as of July 31. The Debtor also owns multiple pieces of
unencumbered real estate.

The Debtor's bankruptcy case was initiated after the Debtor was
subjected to aggressive collection actions stemming from a $2.9
million judgment awarded to a former employee, Adriana Duarte
Valentines, who also filed a motion seeking over $4 million in
attorneys' fees.

Prior to the bankruptcy filing, the creditor recorded a lien,
obtained a writ of execution, and served levies on financial
institutions including U.S. Bank and Merrill Lynch. The trustee,
who has taken control of the estate since his appointment on May
16, has begun evaluating the Debtor's operations and has filed
monthly operating reports. The trustee believes that aside from the
creditor's claims, the Debtor has few other material liabilities
and was generally current with its obligations prior to the
bankruptcy.

The trustee believes the creditor is adequately protected given the
estate's strong financial position -- over $12 million in
investments and unencumbered real estate -- creating a substantial
equity cushion.

Additionally, the trustee proposes to grant replacement liens,
consistent with bankruptcy law, to protect the creditor against any
potential diminution in the value of her interest due to use of
cash collateral. A prior stipulation between the trustee and the
creditor, entered on May 23, maintains a freeze on the Merrill
Lynch funds and is not modified by the motion, though the trustee
reserves the right to seek access to those funds later via separate
court order.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=2peLb8
from PacerMonitor.com.

          About Dedication & Everlasting Love To Animals

Dedication & Everlasting Love To Animals (D.E.L.T.A. Rescue)
operates a no-kill, care-for-life animal sanctuary in Acton, Calif.
Founded in 1979, the organization rescues abandoned dogs and cats,
providing lifelong shelter and medical care across a 115-acre
facility. It is privately funded and not open to the public.

Dedication & Everlasting Love To Animals sought relief under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No.
25-13881) on May 9, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reported
estimated assets between $10 million and $50 million and estimated
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

Judge Neil W. Bason handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by William R. Hess, Esq., at the Law
Offices of William R. Hess.

Todd A. Frealy serves as Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.


DENVER BOULDERING: May Assume Lease with NR Denver Industrial
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Thomas B. McNamara of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Colorado granted the motion to assume
unexpired nonresidential real property lease filed by Denver
Bouldering Club, LLC, debtor-in-possession.

The Court authorizes Debtor, as tenant, to assume its
nonresidential real property lease with NR Denver Industrial
Portfolio LLC, as landlord, of the premises located at 2485 West
2nd Avenue Units 18-20 and portions of Units 16 and 22, Denver,
Colorado 80223.

A copy of the Court's Order dated August 20, 2025, is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Wv4Rpc from PacerMonitor.com.

                About Denver Bouldering Club LLC

Denver Bouldering Club, LLC operates multiple climbing gyms in the
Denver area, offering memberships, coaching, and outdoor
education.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 25-14161) on July 3,
2025. In the petition signed by Thomas Betterton, managing member,
the Debtor disclosed up to $100,000 in assets and up to $1 million
in liabilities.

Judge Thomas B. McNamara oversees the case.

David J. Warner, Esq., at Wadsworth Garber Warner Conrardy, P.C.,
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


DESTINATIONS TO RECOVERY: No Patient Care Concern, PCO Report Says
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tamar Terzian, the patient care ombudsman, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California her fourth
report regarding the quality of patient care provided at
Destinations to Recovery, LLC's treatment facilities.

In the report which covers the period June 7 to August 7, the PCO
disclosed a site visit to the two residential facilities Calenda
and Hatteras. The San Diego locations have no patients due to
Destinations to Recovery not having enough patients and as such,
the PCO did not visit locations with no patients. Destinations to
Recovery will notify the PCO if they have more patients in the
other facilities.

The PCO conducted a visit to all facilities in addition to
verification of licensing, staffing and assuring compliance with
the Department of Health Care Services and the Department of Social
Services. The PCO reviewed each treatment plan, any incident
reports, and discharge planning. There were incidents reported and
Destinations to Recovery properly contacted parents and
authorities. The PCO finds that Destinations to Recovery provides
individualized treatment plans and individualized discharge
planning based on patient needs.

The PCO finds that Destinations to Recovery has more than
sufficient staff to add more patients. Destinations to Recovery
continues to train its staff and prepare for new patients. Two LVNs
administer the medication and monitor patient reaction to
medication by checking in with staff.

Ms. Terzian observed that all medication was properly labeled and
stored for the patients. For each location, there is a designated
staff area that had the medication and files for each participant.

The PCO noted that Destinations to Recovery also provides an
educational component to these various patients who are in
secondary school. She has the following observations for each
residential location:

     * The first residential facility of Hatteras Street is
licensed for six patients and during the time of the visit, there
were six patients at this location. The medication is properly
labeled for the patients' medication. There are no controlled
substances on site for this location. Destinations to Recovery has
provided and informed the PCO of all incidental reports for this
location during the third interim period, which were all incidents
of patients leaving the facility and returning. There was no
physical harm or injury to any patient. No concerns noted.

     * The second residential facility at Calenda has five patients
at the time of the PCO's visit. The home was clean and fully
supplied in the kitchen for patients' meals and care. The home was
clean and fully supplied in the kitchen for patients' meals and
care. There have only been two incidents in this location, which
required safety plan for the patient. No concerns noted.

A copy of the ombudsman report is available for free at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=smrAMZ from PacerMonitor.com.

The ombudsman may be reached at:

     Tamar Terzian, Esq.  
     Email: tterzian@hansonbridgett.com
     Hanson Bridgett, LLP
     601 W. 5th Street, 3rd Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90071
     Tel: (323) 210-7747

                  About Destinations to Recovery

Destinations to Recovery, LLC, operates an IPO and PHO
rehabilitation center located at 20951 Burbank Blvd., Woodland
Hills, Calif.

Destinations to Recovery filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 24-11877) on November 8, 2024, with up to $1 million
in both assets and liabilities. Mark Sharf, Esq., a practicing
attorney in Los Angeles, serves as Subchapter V trustee.

Judge Martin R. Barash oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by Eric Bensamochan, Esq., at The
Bensamochan Law Firm, Inc.

Tamar Terzian is the patient care ombudsman appointed in the
Debtor's case.


EDWARDS BODY: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida
------------------------------------------------------
On August 15, 2025, Edwards Body Shop & Auto Repair Inc. filed
Chapter 11 protection in the Southern District of Florida.
According to court filing, the Debtor reports between $1 million
and $10 million in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition
states funds will be available to unsecured creditors.

         About Edwards Body Shop & Auto Repair Inc.

Edwards Body Shop & Auto Repair Inc. is a vehicle repair and auto
body shop business located in Miami, Florida that specializes in
automotive repair and maintenance services.

Edwards Body Shop & Auto Repair Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 25-19451) on
August 15, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets and liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Corali Lopez-Castro handles the case.


FULLER'S SERVICE: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
Fuller's Service Center, Inc. received a two-month extension from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois to
use cash collateral.

The fourth interim order authorized the company to use its secured
creditors' cash collateral from September 1 to October 31 to pay
its expenses as set forth in the budget, with a 10% variance
allowed. It also authorized the company to obtain a limited secured
financing from Heartland Bank & Trust Company.

Aside from Heartland Bank & Trust Company, the other secured
creditors that assert an interest in the cash collateral are the
U.S. Small Business Administration and Heartland and Carroll's,
LLC, doing business as National Tire Wholesale.

As protection, the secured creditors will be granted security
interests in the company's post-petition assets and the proceeds
thereof, with the same priority and extent as their pre-bankruptcy
liens.

In addition, Heartland Bank & Trust Company will be granted a
"super-priority" claim over all other liens and claims for unpaid
post-petition funds advanced. It will receive repayment first
before other creditors, including administrative claimants.

A final hearing is set for October 22.

A copy of the court's order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://shorturl.at/9EPlV from PacerMonitor.com.

Heartland Bank & Trust Company is represented by:

   Michael A. O'Brien, Esq.
   O'Brien Law Offices, P.C.
   124A S. County Farm Rd.
   Wheaton, IL 60187
   Phone: 630-871-9400
   mobrien@obrienlawoffices.com
   service@obrienlawoffices.com

               About Fuller's Service Center Inc.

Fuller's Service Center, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 25-01345) on
January 29, 2025, listing up to $1 million in assets and up to $10
million in liabilities. Douglas A. Fuller Jr., president of
Fuller's Service Center, signed the petition.

Judge Deborah L. Thorne oversees the case.

David K. Welch, Esq., at Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, P.C.,
is the Debtor's legal counsel.


GENESIS HEALTHCARE: Court Orders Addition of New Committee Members
------------------------------------------------------------------
Clara Geoghegan of Law360 reports that on Friday, August 22, 2025,
a Texas bankruptcy judge directed the U.S. Trustee to add two trade
creditors to the creditors committee of multistate nursing home
operator Genesis Healthcare, finding the panel was overly weighted
toward tort claimants.

                About Genesis Healthcare Inc.

Genesis Healthcare Inc. is a Medical Group, based in Culver City,
CA. The medical group, which has also operated under the names
Daehan Prospect Medical Group and Prospect Genesis Healthcare,
provides physician services in Southern California.

Genesis Healthcare Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case 25-80185) on July 9, 2025.
In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 billion and $10 billion each.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Stacey G. Jernigan handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Marcus Alan Helt, Esq. at Mcdermott
Will & Emery LLP.


GLOBAL CHOICE: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in New York
--------------------------------------------------------
On August 22, 2025, Global Choice Ventures LLC filed Chapter 11
protection in the Northern District of New York. The petition lists
fewer than 49 creditors, with the largest claim held by SKR
Irrevocable Trust at $341,181.96, followed by National Grid at
$3,000 and NYSEG at $700. The filing was signed by owner Larry U.O.
Abolaji.

         About Global Choice Ventures LLC

Global Choice Ventures LLC operates in the real estate sector under
NAICS code 5313.

Global Choice Ventures LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No.
25-30689) on August 22, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports
estimated assets and liabilities between $100,000 and $500,000.

The Debtor is represented by Peter A. Orville, Esq. at Orville &
McDonald Law, P.C.


GLOBAL CONSULTING: Hires Keery McCue PLLC as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Global Consulting and Investment Network LLC seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to hire Keery
McCue PLLC to serve as its legal counsel.

Keery McCue PLLC will provide these services:

   (a) represent the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel in connection
with its Chapter 11 proceedings;

   (b) advise the Debtor regarding its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code;

   (c) prepare and file applications, answers, orders, reports, and
other legal papers as necessary;

   (d) ensure costs included in applications reflect only necessary
and actual costs incurred, excluding overhead items such as
long-distance telephone calls, facsimile charges, and secretarial
overtime;

   (e) provide detailed billing of services rendered and costs
incurred; and

   (f) submit fee applications for approval by the Court, with
notice to creditors and parties-in-interest, subject to Court
review and adjustment.

The Court has clarified that approval of Keery McCue PLLC's
employment does not constitute approval of any specific fee
arrangement. All fees remain subject to separate application,
notice, and Court approval under 11 U.S.C. Sections 327, 328, 329,
330, and 331.

Keery McCue PLLC is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   Keery McCue PLLC
   6803 East Main Street, Suite 1116
   Scottsdale, AZ 85251
   Telephone: (480) 478-0709
   Facsimile: (480) 478-0787
   E-mail: MJM@KEERYMCCUE.COM
         PFK@KEERYMCCUE.COM

          About Global Consulting and Investment Network LLC

Global Consulting and Investment Network LLC is a single asset real
estate business based in Phoenix, Arizona.

Global Consulting and Investment Network LLC sought relief under
Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case No. 25-06519) on July 17, 2025. In its petition, the
Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million each.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Brenda Moody Whiner handles the case.


GR FOUNDER: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in New Jersey
-----------------------------------------------------
On August 14, 2025, GR Founder LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in
the District of New Jersey. According to court filing, the Debtor
reports between $100,000 and $500,000 in debt owed to 1 and 49
creditors. The petition states funds will be available to unsecured
creditors.

         About GR Founder LLC

GR Founder LLC is a single asset real estate company with property
located at 4 North White Horse Pike in Clementon, New Jersey.

GR Founder LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 25-18570) on August 14,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets between
$500,000 and $1 million and estimated liabilities between $100,000
and $500,000.

The Debtor is represented by Ellen M. McDowell, Esq. at McDowell
Law, PC.


GRAHAM PACKAGING: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos., Affirms 'B' ICR
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Graham Packaging Co. Inc.
to positive from stable and affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating.

The positive outlook reflects the company's notable principal debt
paydowns since 2023 and S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA
of 5x in 2024. It also reflects S&P's view that Graham will further
reduce its leverage through earnings growth and cash generation in
2025, absent any additional debt issuances that would increase
leverage.

Graham Packaging utilized free cash flow over the past several
quarters to strengthen its balance sheet through principal term
loan debt repayments. As a result, trailing-12-month S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage fell below 5.0x at the end of
second-quarter 2025.

S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage has dropped significantly due
to $211 million in voluntary term loan repayments and better
operating performance in 2024. Graham improved its S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margin in 2024 through procurement cost
savings and lower raw material pricing. The lower debt and higher
2024 earnings led to S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of 5x at
the end fiscal 2024.

S&P said, "In our view, the major debt reduction illustrates the
company's willingness to strengthen its balance sheet using
internally generated cash flow, and we anticipate the company will
maintain leverage below 5x. We forecast S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
EBITDA margin sustained at high-teens percent, as the company
benefits from its recent strategic realignment and warehouse
optimization efforts, which the company anticipates will result in
$28 million in annualized savings.

"As a result, we forecast a roughly 5% growth in S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA in 2025, leading to leverage of 4.7x in
2025. The company will need to refinance its revolving credit
facility term loan over the near term to avoid becoming current.
Its closest debt maturities are in February and August 2027."

Food and beverage volumes remained sluggish through the first half
of the year, offset by mid-single-digit percent growth within home
care and industrial. Graham reported volumes down 2% in the second
quarter within food and beverage, as demand for sports drinks,
ready-to-drink options, and dressing and condiments remained tepid.
Higher margin drinkable yogurt products remained a growth area for
the company as consumers seek healthier options. Volumes in the
home care and industrials segment increased only 1% in the quarter
given strength within the auto market, but net revenues increased
7% from higher pricing.

S&P said, "We forecast flat to low-single-digit percent revenue
growth due to higher raw material pricing and continued momentum
within industrials, offset by continued soft demand within the
beverage segment. We anticipate Graham's liquidity will remain
robust, with near full availability under its revolving credit
facility and $28 million of cash on the balance sheet, along with
roughly $100 million-$110 million in S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
free operating cash flow (FOCF) projected in 2025. As a result of
the voluntary prepayments, the company is no longer required to
make quarterly amortization payments, further supporting intrayear
liquidity.

"The positive outlook reflects the company's notable principal debt
paydowns since 2023 and S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA
of 5x in 2024. It also reflects our view that Graham will further
reduce its leverage through earnings growth and cash generation in
2025, absent any additional debt issuances that would increase
leverage.

"We could revise our outlook on Graham to stable if macroeconomic
conditions and consumer demand weaken such that its volumes decline
and pressure its earnings and cash flow, causing S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to rise above 5x."

S&P could raise its ratings on the company if:

-- Operating performance and debt reduction result in S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA sustained below 5x;

-- Graham successfully refinances its upcoming revolver and term
loan maturities; and

-- S&P believes that Graham and its ownership are committed to
maintaining financial policies that support better credit metrics.



GUARDIAN HEALTHCARE: PCO Reports Resident Care Complaints
---------------------------------------------------------
Margaret Barajas, the patient care ombudsman, filed her sixth
report regarding the quality of patient care provided by Guardian
Healthcare.

Local ombudsmen have continued to conduct regular visits to these
facilities.

In a Resident Council meeting of July 31 at Kinzua Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, residents reported that meals are often
cold, with some sides not being cooked all the way through. They
also reported that call bells are not being answered quickly
enough, with staff shutting off residents' lights (outside their
doors) and not answering the bells.

The local ombudsman instituted casework on behalf of a resident at
Walnut Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center on June 17 after
receiving word from an interested party (not the POA) that the
resident sustained a fall in the shower when staff transferred him
using a stand aid rather than a Hoyer lift. After meeting with the
resident, and with consent, the ombudsman met with the Assistant
Director of Nursing, who met with the resident to address his
issues.

Based on an Abbreviated survey in response to a complaint completed
July 1, it was determined that Eldercrest Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center was not in compliance with the following
requirement of 42 CFR Part 483, Subpart B, Requirements for Long
Term Care and the 28 Pa. Code, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Long
Term Care Licensure Regulations. The facility failed:

     * To make certain that residents are free of significant
medication errors for two of four residents.

A copy of the ombudsman report is available for free at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=6f21Rs from Omni Agent Solutions, Inc.,
claims agent.

                     About Guardian Healthcare

Guardian Healthcare LLC, doing business as Richland Healthcare and
Rehabilitation Center, provides healthcare services. It offers
services including case management, nursing, wound care,
residential healthcare, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and
mental health care. Guardian Healthcare serves patients in the
United States.

Guardian Elder Care at Johnstown doing business as Richland
Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, along with 19 affiliated
entities sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 24-70299) on July 29, 2024. In its
petition, the Lead Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities
between $1 million and $10 million.

The Debtor tapped Saul Ewing, LLP as legal counsel and Eisner
Advisory Group, LLC as financial advisor. Omni Agent Solutions is
the claims agent.


GWG HOLDINGS: Wind-Down Trustee Resists Ethics Scandal Ouster Bid
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Clara Geoghegan of Law360 reports that the efforts to oust GWG
Holdings' wind-down trustee met resistance from the Texas
bankruptcy lawyer in the role, who argued that her involvement in a
judicial ethics and romance controversy has no impact on the
bankruptcy.

                 About GWG Holdings

Headquartered in Dallas Texas, GWG Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GWGH)
conducts its life insurance secondary market business through a
wholly owned subsidiary, GWG Life, LLC, and GWG Life's wholly owned
subsidiaries.

GWG Holdings Inc. and affiliates sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 22-90032) on April 20,
2022. In the petition filed by Murray Holland, president and chief
executive officer, GWG Holdings disclosed between $1 billion and
$10 billion in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Marvin Isgur oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Mayer Brown, LLP and Jackson Walker, LLP, as
bankruptcy counsels; Tran Singh, LLP as special conflicts counsel;
FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial advisor; and PJT Partners, LP, as
investment banker. Donlin Recano & Company is the Debtors' notice
and claims agent.

National Founders LP, a debtor-in-possession (DIP) lender, is
represented by Michael Fishel, Esq., Matthew A. Clemente, Esq., and
William E. Curtin, Esq., at Sidley Austin, LLP.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed an official committee to
represent bondholders in the Debtors' cases. The committee tapped
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP and Porter Hedges, LLP, as
legal counsels; Piper Sandler & Co. as investment banker; and
AlixPartners, LLP as financial advisor.

The Debtors obtained confirmation of their Further Modified Second
Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on June 20, 2023.


HANESBRANDS INC: Gildan Transaction No Impact on Moody's 'B1' CFR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings says that Hanesbrands Inc.'s ("Hanesbrands"; B1
stable) ratings are not impacted by the pending acquisition by
Gildan Activewear Inc. (Gildan; Baa3 stable). This includes
Hanesbrands' B1 corporate family rating; B1-PD probability of
default rating, Ba2 senior secured bank credit facility rating, B3
senior unsecured rating and SGL-2 speculative grade liquidity
rating.

On August 13, 2025, Gildan and Hanesbrands announced that they
entered a definitive merger agreement for Gildan to acquire
Hanesbrands for an enterprise value of approximately $4.4 billion
[1]. Gildan will fund the transaction through a share swap and
cash, and Gildan will refinance Hanesbrands' approximately $2.0
billion of outstanding debt at the transaction's close. The
acquisition is subject to Hanesbrands shareholder and regulatory
approvals with an expected close by end of 2025 or early 2026. As
Gildan intends to repay Hanesbrands' debt upon closing, Moody's
will expect to withdraw the existing Hanesbrands ratings after
their repayment in full upon closing of the transaction.

Headquartered in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, Hanesbrands Inc.
manufactures and distributes basic apparel products under brands
that include Hanes, Maidenform, Bali, Bonds and Playtex. Revenue
for the go-forward business following its sale of the Champion
brand was about $3.5 billion for the 12 months to June 28, 2025.

Headquartered in Montreal, Canada, Gildan Activewear Inc. is a
vertically integrated manufacturer of everyday basic apparel that
includes activewear, underwear and hosiery products. Revenue for
the 12 months ended June 29, 2025 was approximately $3.3 billion.


HONOR STUDIOS: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Texas
-----------------------------------------------------
On August 22, 2025, Honor Studios LLC filed Chapter 11 protection
in the Northern District of Texas. According to court filing, the
Debtor reports between $100,000 and $500,000 in debt owed to 1 and
49 creditors. The petition states funds will no be available to
unsecured creditors.

         About Honor Studios LLC

Honor Studios LLC, also operating as The House of Honor and House
of Honor, is a limited liability company.

Honor Studios LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 25-43139) on
August 22, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets up to $50,000 and estimated liabilities between $100,000 and
$500,000.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Edward L. Morris handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Robert T. DeMarco, Esq. at DeMarco
Mitchell, PLLC.


HOUSE SPIRITS: Seeks Additional $500,000 DIP Loan
-------------------------------------------------
House Spirits Distillery, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Cour for the
District of Delaware for authority to obtain additional
post-petition financing.

The proposed amendment would authorize an additional $500,000 in
post-petition financing from the existing DIP lenders. The Debtor
has fully drawn the initial DIP facility approved by the court on
June 30 in the amount of $1.55 million and now faces a liquidity
crisis. Without the incremental financing, the Debtor projects that
it will run out of cash by the end of August and will be unable to
meet payroll, pay vendors, or fund other critical operational
expenses.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor
requested authority to access debtor-in-possession financing in the
amount of up to $1.550 million from insider lenders Themiscyra
S.A., Endurance Invest Corp., Maria Isabel Leal, and Trillo San
Carlos S.A., which are the only parties that offered financing
after informal outreach.

All DIP Obligations are due and payable in full in cash unless
otherwise agreed to by the DIP Lenders on the earliest of:

     (i) the date that is 180 days following the Closing Date,
    (ii) the acceleration of the DIP Loan upon the occurrence of an
Event of Default,
   (iii) the date the Bankruptcy Court converts the Chapter 11 Case
to a case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code,
     (v) the date the Bankruptcy Court dismisses the Chapter 11
Case

This request comes at a pivotal time, as the Debtor has also filed
a separate motion seeking to begin a sale process for substantially
all of its assets. That sale, backed by a stalking horse bid from
the DIP lenders, is scheduled for a hearing on October 1. The
Debtor argues that the incremental financing is essential to
continue operations and complete the sale process, thereby
maximizing the value of its assets for the benefit of creditors.
The motion emphasizes that the proposed financing was negotiated in
good faith and at arm's length, and that the original terms and
protections provided under the Final DIP Order would remain in
effect.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=7HyUxS
from PacerMonitor.com.

                  About House Spirits Distillery

House Spirits Distillery LLC, operating under the name Westward
Whiskey, is a Portland, Oregon-based distillery that produces,
markets, sells, and distributes high-quality American single malt
whiskeys. Westward has become one of the most well-known and
respected craft distilleries in the U.S., leading the way in the
emerging Premium American Whiskey category. Unlike traditional
single malts made only from malted barley, Westward employs a
distinctive process that blends elements from American craft ale,
Scottish single malt, and bourbon traditions. The distillery
benefits from the unique climate of the Pacific Northwest, where
hot, dry summers and cool, wet winters contribute to the
development of exceptional, world-class whiskeys.

House Spirits Distillery LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 25-10660) on April 6,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reported estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.

Judge Karen B. Owens handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Joseph C. Barsalona II, Esq. at
Pashman Stein Walder Hayden, PC. The Debtor's claims agent is Epiq
Corporate Restructuring, LLC.






ICORECONNECT INC: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida,
Orlando Division issued a third interim order authorizing
iCoreConnect Inc. and iCore Midco Inc. to use cash collateral
pending a further hearing on September 9.

The third interim order authorized the Debtors to use the cash
collateral of Element SaaS Finance (USA), LLC to fund operational
expenses in accordance with their budget.

As protection for any diminution in the value of its interest in
the cash collateral, Element will be granted a replacement lien on
all assets of the Debtors similar to its pre-bankruptcy collateral,
with the same validity and priority as existed as of the petition
date.

Other creditors with valid pre-bankruptcy liens, including PIGI
Solutions, LLC will also receive replacement liens.

As further protection, the Debtors were ordered to keep their
property insured as per existing lender agreements.

The following constitutes an event of default: (i) either of the
Debtors violates any material provision of the third interim order;
(ii) the appointment of a trustee for either of the Debtors; (iii)
conversion of the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases to Chapter 7; or (iv)
for each weekly period in the budget, the actual "total revenue
receipts" amounts received are more than 10% less than the
projected amounts in the budget for such period; the actual
expenditures exceed the budgeted amount for any single line item by
10% or more for such period; or the actual total expenditures are
more than 10% greater than the total projected expenditures amounts
in the budget for such period.

A copy of the court's order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://shorturl.at/Kwlyo from PacerMonitor.com.

                     About Lake County Hospitality

Lake County Hospitality, LLC operates in the hotel and lodging
sector and is associated with properties in Illinois. It manages
hospitality assets and has been linked to hotels such as Four
Points by Sheraton in Buffalo Grove.

Lake County Hospitality sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 25-08293) on May 30,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reported between $1 million and
$10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Timothy A. Barnes handles the case.

Amy Denton Mayer, Esq., at Stichter Riedel Blain & Postler, P.A. is
the Debtor's legal counsel.

Element SaaS Finance (USA), LLC, as secured creditor, is
represented by:

   Ernest H. Kohlmyer, III, Esq.
   Zimmerman, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A.
   315 E Robinson Street, Suite 600  
   Orlando, FL 32802
   Telephone: (407) 425-7010
   Facsimile: (407) 425-2747


II BALLAKIS FAMILY: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in New York
-----------------------------------------------------------
On August 18, 2025, II Ballakis Family Properties LLC filed
Chapter 11 protection in the Northern District of New York.
According to court filing, the Debtor reports between $100,000 and
$500,000 in debt owed to 200 and 49 creditors. The petition states
funds will be available to unsecured creditors.

         About II Ballakis Family Properties LLC

II Ballakis Family Properties LLC is a single asset real estate
company based in Rome, NY that owns property at 170 Lafayette
Street in Schenectady, New York.

II Ballakis Family Properties LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No. 25-60753) on
August 18, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets and liabilities between $100,000 and $500,000 each.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Patrick G. Radel handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Opal Fayne Hinds, Esq. at Law Office
of Opal Hinds.


IMPERIAL MANUFACTURING: Case Summary & Three Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Imperial Manufacturing, LLC
        327 East LaSalle Street
        Somonauk, IL 60552

Business Description: Imperial Manufacturing, LLC is a single-
                      asset real estate debtor, as defined under
                      11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B), with its
                      principal operations and assets concentrated
                      in its real estate holdings.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois

Case No.: 25-13070

Judge: Hon. Michael B Slade

Debtor's Counsel: Gregory K. Stern, Esq.
                  GREGORY K. STERN, P.C.
                  53 West Jackson Boulevard
                  Suite 1442
                  Chicago, IL 60604
                  Tel: (312) 427-1558
                  Fax: (312) 427-1289
                  E-mail: greg@gregstern.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $0 to $50,000

The petition was signed by Keith Weinstein as manager.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's three unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/52CPWII/Imperial_Manufacturing_LLC__ilnbke-25-13070__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


IVESTER'S TREE: Unsecured Creditors to Split $80K over 4 Years
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ivester's Tree & Lawn LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Utah a Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor is a Utah limited liability company organized to provide
forestry services including harvesting trees and lumber and
providing firewood to various customers.

In September 2024, the Debtor's principal, Christopher Ivester, had
a serious motorcycle accident. This accident resulted in the Debtor
not being able to operate for a significant period of time during
which bills continued to accumulate and remained unpaid.
Unfortunately, the Debtor was unable to generate sufficient income
fast enough to satisfy its creditors' demands.

In later March and early Apri, one of the Debtor's primary
creditors Kubota Credit Corporation, instituted efforts to
repossess one of the Debtor's essential pieces of equipment, which
would have forced the Debtor to cease operations. To avoid such
drastic consequences and to provide the Debtor with the opportunity
to substantially satisfy the claims of its creditors, the Debtor
was left with no choice but to seek the protections of the Code.

Class 20 contains all of the allowed nonpriority unsecured claims
including, Carquest Auto Parts ($3,214.26), Comenity ($15,000.00),
First Citizens (PCO 19-$3,728.35), MACU (POC 20-$14,944.73),
Progressive Insurance ($4,207.28), Rinehart Oil ($35,151.46), Uline
(POC 2-$2,738.35), Zions Bank (PCO 9-$6,784.04) and the unsecured
portion of any allowed claims set forth in Classes 1 through 19.

Creditors in Class 20 shall receive a prorata portion of variable
quarterly payments in the amount of approximately $5,000.00 each
for a period of four years for a total $80,000.00. Such payments
under the Plan shall commence no later than 90 days after the
effective date. The payments will be in full satisfaction of the
respective claims of the creditors in Class 20.

The Reorganized Debtor shall continue to operate the Debtor's
business and to make payments according to the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated August 18,
2025 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=vf5lCY from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Andres Diaz, Esq.
     Timothy J. Larsen, Esq.
     DIAZ & LARSEN
     757 East South Temple, Suite 201
     Salt Lake City, UT 84102
     Telephone: (801) 596-1661
     Facsimile: (801) 359-6803
     Email: courtmail@adexpresslaw.com

                         About Ivester's Tree & Lawn LLC

Ivester's Tree & Lawn LLC is a comprehensive tree and wood service
company based in Tooele, Utah.  The Company specializes in various
services including tree trimming, removal, pruning, stump grinding,
and firewood supply.

Ivester's Tree & Lawn LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No.
25-21998) on April 11, 2025.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.

Bankruptcy Judge Peggy Hunt handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Andres Diaz, Esq. at DIAZ & LARSEN.


JACKSBOSTON LLC: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------
Jackboston LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, Raleigh Division, for authority to use
cash collateral and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor, a North Carolina limited liability company operating
for over a decade, specializes in print-on-demand e-commerce and
marketing services. Its headquarters is in Clayton, North Carolina,
with clients across the U.S. On August 21, the Debtor filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief and now seeks to reorganize its
operations, reduce cash flow burdens, and continue its business as
a going concern through a consensual Chapter 11 plan.

The Debtor believes that seven creditors may hold secured interests
in its cash collateral, based on UCC-1 financing statements filed
with the North Carolina Secretary of State.

These creditors include:
1. Clear Finance Tech Corp. – filed on March 7, 2024
2. On Deck Capital – filed on September 12, 2024
3. United First, LLC and Flash Funding – two loans, filed on
February 28
4. Cooper Investments, LLC – filed on April 4
5. Velocity Capital Group – filed on May 13
6. PayPal Loan Builder – filed on June 5

The secured creditors have not yet consented to the Debtor's
proposed use of cash collateral. At the time of filing, the Debtor
had approximately $8,376 in cash, which it has transferred into a
debtor-in-possession operating account. It also holds approximately
$49,200 in unencumbered personal property, including inventory,
equipment, furnishings, and receivables not subject to any prior
perfected lien.

The Debtor asserts that access to this cash collateral is essential
to continue operations and preserve the business's value.

The Debtor proposes to provide adequate protection to any secured
creditors by granting replacement liens on post-petition cash and
assets, mirroring the extent and priority of their pre-petition
liens. Additionally, the Debtor proposes to make an adequate
protection payment of $974 to Clearco, which reflects the
anticipated monthly secured payment to be included in the Debtor's
forthcoming plan of reorganization, expected to be filed within
days.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=hrPJp9
from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About Jackboston LLC

Jackboston LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Case No. 25-03234) on August 21,
2025. In the petition signed by Cortland Rush, chief executive
officer, the Debtor disclosed up to $500,000 in assets and up to
$10 million in liabilities.

Judge Pamela W. McAffee oversees the case.

Danny Bradford, Esq., at Paul D. Bradford, PLLC, represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.





JACKSON HOSPITAL: PCO Reports No Staffing Shortages
---------------------------------------------------
Suzanne Koenig, the patient care ombudsman, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Alabama her third
report regarding the quality of patient care provided by Jackson
Hospital & Clinic, Inc. and affiliates.

In the report which covers the period June 21 to August 19, the
ombudsman representatives met with the chief operating officer and
the chief nursing officer during the unannounced visit to Jackson
Hospital.

The ombudsman explained how the Chief Nursing Officer and Chief
Operating Officer shared that interviews have been conducted with
three cardiologists, with the hope of hiring one within the next
couple of weeks. There is also optimism about upcoming interviews
for a new general surgeon. Additionally, offers have been extended
for a Nocturnist (a hospital doctor who works night shifts) and a
local Hospitalist (a physician who works primarily in the hospital
setting).

The PCO representative toured the hospital kitchen. The PCO
representative noted that food temperatures in the tray line were
checked before meals were plated for delivery to ensure compliance
with food safety regulatory standards. All food items, both dry
goods and refrigerated products, were found to be properly labeled
with "received-on" date stickers to help track freshness and proper
storage.

During the visit, the 3 East/Patient Care Unit (PCU) had 18
patients. The PCO representative was met by the Department Director
and the Patient Care Manager. The Director reported that there are
some staffing vacancies in the department but is adjusting
schedules to make sure patients' needs are met.

At the time of visit at 4 East Med Surg/Bariatric Unit, census was
19. The PCO observed that the unit was clean, well-organized, and
fully stocked. A blue strip magnet was located on a patient room
door frame. There were no staffing shortages or medication supply
issues reported. Crash cart and temperature checks were up to
date.

The ombudsman noted that the 6 East/Orthopedic Unit had recently
completed its floor cleaning project corridors are clean and
clutter free. It was reported that there were no staffing
shortages. Patient rooms were clean; supply rooms were fully
stocked there were no expired items located during inspection. code
carts had been checked daily, per policy, for the month of June.

Ms. Koenig did not observe any significant concerns during this
report period.

A copy of the ombudsman report is available for free at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=wIUo38 from PacerMonitor.com.

The PCO can be reached at:

     Suzanne Koenig
     SAK Healthcare
     300 Saunders Road, Suite 300
     Riverwoods, IL 60015
     Phone: 847-446-8400
     Fax: 847-446-8432
     skoenig@sakhealthcare.com

               About Jackson Hospital & Clinic Inc.

Jackson Hospital & Clinic, Inc. is a non-membership, non-profit
corporation based in Alabama. JHC is the direct or indirect parent
company of JHC Pharmacy, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company
that provides pharmacy services to JHC patients. JHC owns 100% of
JHC Pharmacy. Additionally, JHC is a direct or indirect parent
company of certain other entities that have not filed for
bankruptcy.

JHC operates a 344-bed healthcare facility in Montgomery, Ala.,
with a rich history dating back to 1894. Since its official opening
in 1946, JHC has grown into one of the largest hospitals in
Alabama, offering specialized services in cardiac care, cancer
treatment, neurosciences, orthopedics, women's care, and emergency
services. JHC's service area includes 16 counties across central
Alabama.

JHC and JHC Pharmacy filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. M.D. Ala.
Lead Case No. 25-30256) on February 4, 2025. In its petition, JHC
reported between $100 million and $500 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Christopher L. Hawkins handles the cases.

The Debtors are represented by Derek F. Meek, Esq. at Burr &
Forman, LLP.

Suzanne Koenig serves as patient care ombudsman.


JHRG MANUFACTURING: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------------
JHRG Manufacturing LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina, Raleigh Division, for authority
to use cash collateral and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor's business relies entirely on its ongoing operations for
income and must meet regular expenses including payroll, utilities,
insurance, supplies, and freight. Without immediate access to
funds, the Debtor warns that it cannot continue its operations,
leading to irreparable harm to the bankruptcy estate.

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service and WBL SPO I, LLC may assert
interests in the Debtor's cash collateral.

As adequate protection to the secured creditors, the Debtor
proposes to grant replacement liens on post-petition cash
collateral in the same amount and priority as pre-petition liens,
ensuring creditors' interests are preserved despite the temporary
use of their collateral.

The Debtor's 15-day operating budget projects $22,000 in revenue
and $12,201 in expenses, resulting in a positive cash balance of
$9,799.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=INmwYo
from PacerMonitor.com.

                About JHRG Manufacturing LLC

JHRG Manufacturing LLC is a North Carolina-based company that
specializes in the production of personal protective garments and
safety-related items used in industrial and recreational settings.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Case No. 25-03211-5-DMW) on
August 20, 2025. In the petition signed by John E. Holland,
member/manager, the Debtor disclosed up to $500,000 in assets and
up to $1 million in liabilities.

Judge David M. Warren oversees the case.

Benjamin R. Eisner, Esq., at The Law Offices of George Oliver,
PLLC, represents the Debtor as legal counsel.

WBL SPO I, LLC, as lender, is represented by:

   William Walt Pettit
   HUTCHENS LAW FIRM LLP
   6230 Fairview Road, Suite 315
   Charlotte, N.C. 28210
   Telephone: (704) 362-9255
   Telecopier: (704) 362-9268
   walt.pettit@hutchenslawfirm.com


JOSHUA MANAGEMENT: Gets OK to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 15
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
granted Joshua Management LLC interim authority to use cash
collateral of DOF NPL III, LLC through October 15.

The court authorized the Debtor to use cash collateral as per the
approved budget, subject to a 10% variance.

As adequate protection, the Debtor will grant DOF NPL III, LLC
replacement liens on all post-petition assets equal in priority to
its pre-bankruptcy liens; and a superpriority administrative
expense claim under 11 U.S.C. Sections 503 and 507(b). These
protections are designed to shield the lender from any diminution
in the value of its collateral resulting from the Debtor's use of
cash collateral or the imposition of the automatic stay.

In addition, DOF will receive monthly payments of $21,552 for July,
August and September.

The Debtor's authority to use cash collateral terminates upon
conversion/dismissal of its bankruptcy case; confirmation of a
Chapter 11 plan; Debtor default not cured within 10 business days;
unauthorized modification of the order; or termination of business
operations.

The final hearing is scheduled for October 15.

A copy of the court's order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://shorturl.at/Am0oz from PacerMonitor.com.

                 About Joshua Management LLC

Joshua Management, LLC is a New York-based real estate management
company operating as a single asset real estate entity.

Joshua Management sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 25-11568) on July 16,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reported between $1 million and
$10 million in assets and liabilities.

Judge Philip Bentley oversees the case.

Robert Leslie Rattet, Esq., at Davidoff Hutcher & Citron, LLP is
the Debtor's legal counsel.

DOF NPL III, LLC, as lender, is represented by:

   Ronald M. Terenzi, Esq.
   Terenzi & Confusione, P.C.
   401 Franklin Avenue, Suite 304
   Garden City, NY 11530
   (516) 812-0800
   rterenzi@tcpclaw.com


JT MASONRY: Case Summary & One Unsecured Creditor
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: JT Masonry & Landscaping Inc.
        96 Gardiners Avenue
        Levittown, NY 11756

Business Description: JT Masonry & Landscaping Inc. provides
                      masonry and landscaping services for
                      residential and commercial clients,
                      operating primarily in Levittown, New York,
                      and across Long Island.  The Company offers
                      services including stone and brick masonry,
                      concrete work, patios, walkways, retaining
                      walls, outdoor kitchens, pool installations,
                      and landscape design.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York

Case No.: 25-73235

Judge: Hon. Alan S Trust

Debtor's Counsel: Heath S. Berger, Esq.
                  BFSNG LAW GROUP, LLP
                  6851 Jericho Turnpike
                  Suite 250
                  Syosset, NY 11791
                  Tel: 516-747-1136
                  Email: hberger@bfslawfirm.com

Total Assets: $1,323,311

Total Liabilities: $3,721,370

The petition was signed by Alfred Debatto as president.

The Debtor identified Loan Builder Paypal, based at 2211 N. First
Street, San Jose, California 95131, as its only unsecured creditor,
with a claim of $12,955 related to a loan.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/JUISP4I/JT_Masonry__Landscaping_Inc__nyebke-25-73235__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


KESKIN INC: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
Keskin, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Maryland for authority to use cash collateral and provide adequate
protection.

The Debtor experienced financial challenges, including pre-petition
arrears such as $250,000 in unpaid wages and $5,000 in payroll
taxes but reports that its business has now stabilized and can
operate profitably if freed from the burden of pre-petition debt
payments.

In October 2020, the Debtor obtained a $500,000 loan from the U.S.
Small Business Administration. This SBA Loan is secured by a
first-priority, properly perfected UCC-1 lien on the Debtor's cash
and accounts receivable. As of the petition date, the SBA loan
remains unpaid in full.

After the SBA loan, the Debtor obtained additional loans from four
other lenders: Web Bank, Radiance Funding, Forward Financing, and
US Foods. These creditors also filed UCC-1 financing statements
asserting security interests in the Debtor's cash and receivables.
However, their filings came after the SBA's, and the SBA's lien
fully absorbs any equity in the Debtor's assets, rendering these
subsequent claims undersecured. As such, the Debtor argues that
these Non-SBA creditors are not entitled to adequate protection
payments.

A court hearing is scheduled for August 28.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=VH2XQ2
from PacerMonitor.com.

                     About Keskin, Inc.

Keskin, Inc. is a Maryland corporation operating a single-location
Mediterranean restaurant.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 25-17696) on August 22,
2025. In the petition signed by Rustem Keskin, owner, the Debtor
disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $100,000 in
liabilities.

Michael P. Coyle, Esq., at The Coyle Law Group, represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.


KINGS ESTATES: To Sell Philadelphia Property to Martin Rembert
--------------------------------------------------------------
King Estates LLC seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Jersey, to sell Property located at 3525
North 18th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, free and clear of liens,
claims, interests, and encumbrances.

The Debtor's Property is a single-family home that is also
comprised of personal property and fixtures.

The Debtor wants to sell the Property to  Martin Rembert for the
price of $210,000.00.

The sale will be free and clear of liens without proven liens
attached to the proceeds of sale.

The Debtor will pay at closing the First Mortgage of Planet Home
Funding servicer for Athene Annuity, ordinary closing costs, and
$2,500.00 Gorski & Knowlton as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.

          About King Estates LLC

King Estates LLC is the owner of six properties located in New
Jersey having a total current value of $1.88 million.

King Estates LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 24-20454) on
October 22, 2024. In the petition filed by Donald Hill, as
authorized representative, the Debtor reports total assets of
$1,880,100 and total liabilities of $1,019,965.

The Debtor is represented by Allen I. Gorski, Esq. at GORSKI &
KNOWLTON PC.


KULA GRAIN: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to September 19
------------------------------------------------------------
Kula Grain Co., Inc. d/b/a Kula Grain Company asked the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to extend its
exclusivity periods to file a plan of reorganization September 19,
2025.

The Debtor is a Colorado corporation which owns and operates a
family-owned grain and agricultural products business in Fort
Morgan, Colorado. Debtor also engages in grain handling, which
includes trucking and transfer loading for third parties. It is
currently in the process of reorganizing its debts.

The Debtor filed this Chapter 11 in light of ongoing shortfalls
suffered due to increased costs to purchase and transport
cottonseed from Texas, which was its original pre-petition business
model. Indeed, for the past five years, Texas has been hit hard by
a drought, devastating the cottonseed crop over the years and
leading to a significant increase in prices. Debtor, therefore,
needed an ability to reorganize to address these ongoing issues.

For the following reasons, the Debtor requires additional time to
be able to formulate meaningful projections of future performance
and a feasible Plan:

     * The Debtor made a proposal to its primary secured creditor
and lender High Plains Bank, regarding treatment of its secured
claims. However, the parties are still in the process of
negotiations. Debtor hopes to be able to settle the matter with the
Bank and agree on consensual plan terms.

     * The treatment of the Bank under the forthcoming plan will
impact projections, as well as payments to unsecured creditors.
Accordingly, additional time is required to negotiate with the Bank
and formulate projections based thereon, which is of utmost
importance for the Debtor and its additional creditors.

The Debtor is requesting an extension of the exclusive period for
an additional 30 days, through and including September 19, 2025, as
well as an extension of the 180-day period to solicit acceptances
of its initial Plan of Reorganization for an additional 30 days.

While Debtor hopes to file a Plan before such extended period
expires, Debtor seeks this extension in order to give Debtor and
High Plains sufficient time to come to a resolution, if possible.

Kula Grain Co. Inc. is represented by:

      Jeffrey A. Weinman, Esq.
      Bailey C. Pompea, Esq.
      Allen Vellone Wolf Helfrich & Factor P.C.
      1600 Stout Street, Suite 1900
      Denver, CO 80202
      Tel: (303) 534-4499
      Email: JWeinman@allen-vellone.com
      Email: BPompea@allen-vellone.com

                       About Kula Grain Co. Inc.

Kula Grain Co. Inc. is a Fort-Morgan, Colorad-based grain merchant
and interstate freight carrier that hauls dry-bulk farm
commodities.

Kula Grain Co. Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Col. Case No. 25-12338) on April 22,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Joseph G. Rosania Jr. handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Jeffrey A. Weinman, Esq. at ALLEN
VELLONE WOLF HELFRICH & FACTOR, P.C.


L & D CAFE: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
----------------------------------------
L & D Cafe, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division, for authority to use
cash collateral and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor requests both interim and final orders allowing the
Debtor to access cash collateral, which includes $35,982 held in
its pre-petition bank accounts and on hand as of August 21, for
general operating purposes through September 21.

The Debtor says that this access is essential to continue business
operations, meet payroll, and pay necessary expenses such as rent
and utilities, without which the business would be forced to shut
down, causing a severe loss of value to the estate and creditors
alike.

The creditors asserting an interest in the cash collateral include
the U.S. Small Business Administration, WebBank, Rapid Finance, and
CFG Merchant Solutions, LLC. However, only the SBA appears to be
meaningfully secured.

As of the petition date, the SBA is owed $168,240 and holds a
first-position lien on substantially all of the Debtor's assets,
backed by a UCC-1 financing statement filed in September 2020. The
remaining creditors have filed more recent UCC-1 statements --
WebBank in April 2024, Rapid Finance in January 2025, and CFG
Merchant Solutions in January 2025 -- and are likely unsecured due
to the SBA's senior lien and the limited value of the Debtor's
assets. CFG, in particular, obtained a judgment against the Debtor
just prior to the bankruptcy and froze its bank account, which the
Debtor is currently working to unfreeze.

To ensure that the SBA's interest is adequately protected during
the use of cash collateral, the Debtor proposes several forms of
protection. First, it asserts that continued operations of the
restaurant maintain and enhance the value of the SBA's collateral.
Second, it offers to grant the SBA and other purported secured
lenders replacement liens on post-petition assets of the same kind,
extent, and priority as their pre-petition liens, subject to
avoidance claims and bankruptcy court approval. These replacement
liens would not attach to any proceeds recovered under the Debtor's
avoidance powers. Additionally, the SBA may be entitled to
post-petition interest, further safeguarding its claim.

A court hearing is scheduled for August 28.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qUvcUi
from PacerMonitor.com.

                      About L & D Cafe Inc.

L & D Cafe, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 25-19748-PDR) on August
22, 2025. In the petition signed by Constantine N. Manos,
president, the Debtor disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to
$10 million in liabilities.

Judge Peter D. Russin oversees the case.

Chad P. Pugatch, Esq., at Lorium Law represents the Debtor as
bankruptcy counsel.


LA CREME: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in California
-----------------------------------------------------
On August 17, 2025, La Creme LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in
the Central District of California. According to court filing, the
Debtor reports between $100,000 and $500,000 in debt owed to 1 and
49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.

         About La Creme LLC

La Creme LLC, operating as LA CREME CAFE, is a restaurant business
that sells food to the public with a location at the Century City
Mall in Los Angeles. The company operates a cafe at 10250 Santa
Monica Boulevard, Space No. FC24, in Los Angeles.

La Creme LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 25-17118) on August
17, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets up
to $50,000 and estimated liabilities between $100,000 and
$500,000.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Nina Aritonova, Esq. at The Law Office
of Nina Aritonova


LARCO POOLS: Hires Ford & Semach P.A. as Bankruptcy Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Larco Pools LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, to hire Ford &
Semach, P.A. to serve as bankruptcy counsel in its Chapter 11
case.

Ford & Semach, P.A. will render these services:

   (a) analyzing the financial situation, and rendering advice and
assistance to the Debtor in determining whether to file a petition
under Title 11, United States Code;

   (b) advising the Debtor with regard to the powers and duties of
the debtor and as Debtor-in-Possession in the continued operation
of the business and management of the property of the estate;

   (c) preparing and filing of the petition, schedules of assets
and liabilities, statement of affairs, and other documents required
by the Court;

   (d) representing the Debtor at the Creditors' meeting;

   (e) providing legal advice to the Debtor with respect to its
powers and duties as Debtor and as Debtor-in-Possession in the
continued operation of its business and management of its property,
if appropriate;

   (f) advising the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
complying with the United States Trustee's Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements and with the rules of the court;

   (g) preparing necessary motions, pleadings, applications,
answers, orders, complaints, and other legal papers and appear at
hearings thereon;

   (h) protecting the interest of the Debtor in all matters pending
before the court;

   (i) representing the Debtor in negotiation with its creditors in
the preparation of the Chapter 11 Plan; and

   (j) providing all other legal services for Debtor as
Debtor-in-Possession which may be necessary herein.

Ford & Semach, P.A. will receive these hourly rates:

          $550        Buddy D. Ford
          $500        Jonathan A. Semach
          $450        Heather M. Reel, and
          $150        paralegals

Prior to the filing, the Debtor paid the firm a $12,000 advance fee
consisting of a $10,262 pre-filing fee retainer, $0 post-filing
retainer, and $1,738 costs retainer including the filing fee.

Ford & Semach, P.A. represents that it is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, with
no connection to the Debtor, creditors, or other parties in
interest, except for a prior representation of the Debtor's
president, Michael Lara, and his wife in a personal Chapter 13 case
in 2009.

The firm can be reached at:

   Buddy D. Ford, Esq.
   Jonathan A. Semach, Esq.
   Heather M. Reel, Esq.
   FORD & SEMACH, P.A.
   9301 West Hillsborough Avenue
   Tampa, FL 33615-3008
   Telephone: (813) 877-4669
   E-mail: Buddy@tampaesq.com
         Jonathan@tampaesq.com
         Heather@tampaesq.com


                          About Larco Pools

Larco Pools is a swimming pool contractor based in Dunedin,
Florida. The company specializes in swimming pool construction,
installation, maintenance, and repair services, operating primarily
in Pinellas County.

Larco Pools sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 25-05760) on August
14, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets
between $100,000 and $500,000 and estimated liabilities between
$500,000 and $1 million.

The Debtor is represented by Buddy D. Ford, Esq. at Ford & Semach,
P.A.


LEGACY DRAYAGE: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
Legacy Drayage, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, Los Angeles Division, for authority to use
cash collateral in accordance with the budget, with a 20%
variance.

The Debtor emphasized the necessity of accessing cash collateral
and continuing the accounts receivable factoring relationship with
Alterna Capital Solutions, LLC to fund critical business operations
such as payroll, rent, leases, and fuel. Without this liquidity,
the Debtor would be forced to cease operations, harming its
enterprise value and ability to reorganize.

The Debtor argued that both secured creditors, Alterna and Global
Merchant Cash Inc., would be adequately protected. As of the
petition date, Alterna was owed approximately $720,000, and Global
approximately $380,000, while the Debtor's assets, including cash,
receivables, and equipment, totaled roughly $1.5 million indicating
an equity cushion of over 100% for both creditors. Additionally,
both secured creditors would receive adequate protection payments
and replacement liens with the same validity and priority as their
pre-petition liens, excluding Chapter 5 avoidance actions.

The Debtor's bankruptcy was triggered by a financial and legal
dispute with its former landlord, Lift II Avalon LLC, over a
commercial lease for a 5.1-acre yard and warehouse in Carson,
California. Although the Debtor entered into the lease in late
2022, occupancy was delayed, and Lift II failed to complete
promised improvements, especially to the yard's asphalt and
concrete. These failures led to damaged goods and lost business.
The Debtor negotiated two lease amendments with Lift II for rent
abatements and repairs, but Lift II ultimately failed to meet its
obligations. Meanwhile, market rates in the logistics sector
plummeted due to industry-wide slowdowns, making the lease cost --
originally over $255,000 per month -- unsustainable.

Despite growing revenues ($4.9 million in 2023, $11.1 million in
2024, and $6.6 million in the first seven months of 2025), the
Debtor's profitability was eroded by the Avalon lease costs and
Lift II's failures. After Lift II sought to enforce the lease and
guaranty through two state court lawsuits -- an unlawful detainer
action and a $9.9 million guaranty claim against CEO Walter Umana
-- the Debtor responded with its own fraud and breach of contract
suit, alleging Lift II fraudulently induced it to sign an estoppel
certificate under false pretenses.

To reduce overhead and reposition the business for profitability,
the Debtor signed a new lease on July 29 for a lower-cost facility
in Compton, California, at roughly half the per-square-foot rent of
the Avalon premises. The Debtor intends to vacate the Avalon
premises by August 22 and has moved to reject the Avalon lease. The
bankruptcy filing was thus necessitated by Lift II's litigation and
refusal to negotiate, mounting operational losses, and the need to
secure court protection during the reorganization.

The Debtor's key assets as of the petition date included
approximately $151,849 in cash, $720,423 in factored receivables
with Alterna, $597,071 in unfactored receivables, and $31,568 in
equipment. The Debtor also noted that it had various leased
vehicles and potentially valuable goodwill. Based on a UCC search,
only Alterna and Global hold liens on cash collateral, while other
secured creditors (Toyota, C.H. Brown, and Alliance Funding Group)
do not. Alterna's IPSA, signed in May, allows it to purchase
receivables at roughly 92% of face value and provide the Debtor
with working capital. Global, under a separate July agreement,
purchased $520,000 in receivables and is owed approximately
$380,000, which the Debtor used to fund the Santa Fe lease.

The Debtor concluded that without the requested relief, it would be
unable to continue operations and risk immediate and irreparable
harm. Its strategy for successful reorganization includes vacating
the Avalon premises, reducing fixed costs via the Santa Fe lease,
maintaining access to factoring arrangements, and stabilizing cash
flow. The Debtor believes that these steps will position it for
profitability and allow it to confirm a viable Subchapter V
reorganization plan for the benefit of creditors.

                     About Legacy Drayage Inc.

Legacy Drayage, Inc provides trucking, freight logistics, and
transportation services, offering solutions such as drayage,
transloading, hazardous materials handling, overweight cargo
transport, and over-the-road trucking.  The Company serves
customers with route planning, warehousing, and logistics
management, and emphasizes technology-driven operations to improve
service levels and delivery efficiency.  It also engages in
zero-emissions trucking and logistics initiatives as part of its
operations.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 25-17226) on August 20,
2025. In the petition signed by Walter Umana, president and chief
executive officer, the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Barry Russell oversees the case.

Ron Bender, Esq., at Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Golubchik, LLP,
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.



LIFESCAN GLOBAL: Seeks to Hire Porter Hedges as Co-Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
LifeScan Global Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire Porter Hedges LLP
to serve as its co-counsel.

Porter Hedges LLP will provide these services:

   (a) provide legal advice and services regarding local rules,
practices, and procedures;

   (b) provide certain services in connection with administration
of the Chapter 11 cases, including, without limitation, preparing
agendas, hearing notices, and hearing binders of documents and
pleadings;

   (c) prepare, review, and comment on proposed drafts of pleadings
to be filed with the Court as bankruptcy co-counsel to the
Debtors;

   (d) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' rights and
duties as debtors in possession and continued business operations;

   (e) assist, advise, and represent the Debtors in any cash
collateral matters;

   (f) assist, advise, and represent the Debtors in the preparation
of sale and bid procedures to auction the Debtors' assets;

   (g) take necessary action to protect and preserve the Debtors'
estate;

   (h) assist, advise, and represent the Debtors in any manner
relevant to preserving and protecting the Debtors' estates;

   (i) prepare on behalf of the Debtors all necessary applications,
motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers;

   (j) appear in Court and to protect the Debtors' interests before
the Court;

   (k) perform all other necessary or requested litigation
services;

   (l) at the request of the Debtors, appear in Court and at any
meeting with the U.S. Trustee and any meeting of creditors at any
given time on behalf of the Debtors as their bankruptcy co-counsel;
and

   (m) provide other legal advice and services, as requested by the
Debtors, from time to time.

The current 2025 standard hourly rates are:

         $565 to $1,250 for partners
         $450 to $1,195 for counsel
         $450 to $875 for associates and staff attorneys, and
         $340 to $555 for paraprofessionals.

Porter Hedges LLP received a $75,000 retainer on June 17, 2025, and
a $110,642 retainer on July 14, 2025. After payment of certain
prepetition fees and expenses, the balance of the retainer is
$107,653.50.

Porter Hedges LLP is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   John F. Higgins, Esq.
   M. Shane Johnson, Esq.
   Megan Young-John, Esq.
   PORTER HEDGES LLP
   1000 Main Street, 36th Floor
   Houston, TX 77002
   Telephone: (713) 226-6000
   Facsimile: (713) 226-6248

             About LifeScan Global Corporation

LifeScan delivers personalized health, wellness, and digital
solutions to individuals living with diabetes. Since 1981, LifeScan
has advanced glucose care and diabetes management with pioneering
technologies and new products, and is actively engaged in
designing, developing, manufacturing, and marketing devices,
software, and applications. Its comprehensive portfolio of
diabetes-related products and services includes blood glucose
monitoring devices, blood glucose test strips, lancing devices, and
digital applications.

LifeScan Global Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 25-90259) on July
15, 2025. As of the Petition Date, the Debtors have approximately
$786 million assets and approximately $1.7 billion in liabilities.

Judge Alfredo R Perez presides over the case.

Megan Young-John and John F Higgins, IV at Porter Hedges LLP,
represent the Debtor as legal counsel. Milbank LLP as co-counsel.
PJT Partners LP as investment banker.


LITTLE MINT: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to October 27
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Little Mint, Inc., asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina to extend its exclusivity
periods to file a plan of reorganization and obtain acceptance
thereof to October 27 and December 26, 2025, respectively.

The Debtor filed its proposed Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
Statement on May 30, 2025.

On March 27, 2025, the Debtor filed a Motion to Bifurcate Hearings
on the Approval of Debtor's Disclosure Statement and Confirmation
of the Plan of Reorganization (the "Bifurcation Motion") and the
Court entered an Order allowing the Bifurcation Motion on March 31,
2025.

The hearing on the Disclosure Statement is scheduled for September
23, 2025. The Debtor intends to amend its Plan and Disclosure
Statement after completing negotiations with all secured and
unsecured creditors.

The Debtor explains that an extension of the exclusivity and
acceptance periods will allow the Debtor time to continue to make
progress in negotiations with its many creditors. Accordingly,
cause exists to extend the exclusivity and acceptance periods as
provided herein.

The Debtor claims that an order allowing the extensions as
requested in this application will not prejudice any party and is
in the best interests of the Estate and all parties in interest.

The Little Mint Inc. is represented by:

     Rebecca Redwine Grow, Esq.
     Jason L. Hendren, Esq.
     Benjamin E.F.B. Waller, Esq.
     Lydia C. Stoney, Esq.
     Hendren, Redwine & Malone PLLC
     4600 Marriott Drive Suite 150
     Raleigh, NC 27612
     Telephone: (919) 420-7867
     Facsimile: (919) 420-0475
     Email: jhendren@hendrenmalone.com
            rredwine@hendrenmalone.com
            bwaller@hendrenmalone.com
            lstoney@hendrenmalone.com

                          About The Little Mint Inc.

The Little Mint Inc., doing business as Hwy 55 Burgers Shakes &
Fries, owns multiple Hwy 55 Burgers, Shakes & Fries restaurants.

The Little Mint Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 24-04510) on Dec. 31,
2024. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets between
$1 million and $10 million and estimated liabilities between $10
million and $50 million.

Judge Joseph N. Callaway presides over the case.

Rebecca F. Redwine, Esq. of HENDREN, REDWINE & MALONE, PLLC
represents the Debtor as counsel.


MARTINES PALMEIRO: Hires Kutner Brinen Dickey as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Martines Palmeiro Construction, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to hire Kutner Brinen
Dickey Riley, P.C. to serve as its legal counsel.

Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, P.C. will provide these services:

   (a) provide the Debtor with legal advice with respect to its
powers and duties;

   (b) aid the Debtor in the development of a plan of liquidation
under Chapter 11;

   (c) file the necessary petitions, pleadings, reports, and
actions which may be required in the continued administration of
the Debtor's property under Chapter 11;

   (d) take necessary actions to enjoin and stay until final decree
herein continuation of pending proceedings and to enjoin and stay
until final decree herein commencement of lien foreclosure
proceedings and all matters as may be provided under 11 U.S.C. Sec.
362;

   (e) represent the Debtor with respect to any and all necessary
adversary proceeding;

   (f) facilitate settlement negotiations to maximize the value of
claims the Debtor holds and to reduce claims against the estate;
and

   (g) perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may be
necessary herein.

The firm's customary hourly rates are:

  -- Jeffrey S. Brinen         $540
  -- Jenny Fujii               $440
  -- Keri L. Riley             $390

Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, P.C. is a "disinterested person" within
the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   Keri L. Riley, Esq.
   KUTNER BRINEN DICKEY RILEY, P.C.
   1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1720
   Denver, CO 80264
   Telephone: (303) 832-2400
   E-mail: klr@kutnerlaw.com

                About Martines Palmeiro Construction

Martines Palmeiro Construction LLC is a Denver-based general
contractor specializing in high-density residential, senior living,
and retail commercial projects across Colorado and Texas. Founded
in 2011, the firm offers services including general contracting,
construction management, and design-build solutions.

Martines Palmeiro Construction LLC sought relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 25-12313) on
April 21, 2025.  In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets up to $50,000 and estimated liabilities between $10 million
and $50 million.

Judge Thomas B. McNamara oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by Jeffrey A. Weinman, Esq. at Allen
Vellone Wolf Helfrich & Factor, PC.


MCMILLAN LOGGING: Case Summary & 13 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: McMillan Logging, Inc.
        15405 NW Pea Ridge Road
        Bristol, FL 32321

Business Description: McMillan Logging, Inc. is a Florida-based
                      logging contractor that engages in timber
                      harvesting and related hauling services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Florida

Case No.: 25-40405

Debtor's Counsel: Byron W. Wright III, Esq.
                  BRUNER WRIGHT, P.A.
                  2868 Remington Green Circle, Suite B
                  Tallahassee, FL 32308
                  Tel: (850) 385-0342
                  Fax: (850) 270-2441
                  E-mail: twright@brunerwright.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by James S McMillan as president.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 13 unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/JX2B2EY/McMillan_Logging_Inc__flnbke-25-40405__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


MENORAH CAMPUS: No Resident Concern, 2nd PCO Report Says
--------------------------------------------------------
Michele McKay, the patient care ombudsman, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York filed her
second report regarding the quality of resident care provided by
Menorah Campus Independent Senior Apartments, Inc.

In the report which covers the period May 15 to August 15, the PCO
did not make a visit as the remaining residents at Forest Creek
Apartments facility were in process of moving out. The PCO was
alerted by the apartment manager, Holly Steeg, that the remaining
three residents were given notice on June 6 by the Weinberg
Administrator, Robert Mayer, that the facility would be fully
closing and that they would need to find other living
arrangements.

On July 25, the PCO made a visit to Haskell and James Stovroff
Towers Apartments facility during which she met with Kubillah
Ingram, Building Superintendent, and one resident who is not a part
of the PACE senior day program. The exterior of the building was
free from litter and the lawn and landscaping were noted to be
trimmed, and as noted previously, while neat and free from litter,
the interior shows signs of flooring wear and staining and painting
needs.

During the PCO visit, the PCO noted that the lobby appeared quite
warm and Mr. Ingram stated that there is no central air
conditioning but each apartment and his office do have air
conditioning. The elevator and automatic exterior doors are in
working order, and visitors and caregivers were seen in the
building during the visit. Mr. Ingram reported that laundry units
on each floor remain working and free for use by all residents and
their caregivers.

The PCO spoke with a resident who was moving freely in and out of
the building with assistance of a rolling walker when she arrived.
This resident reported that they have had issues with losing the
key to their apartment and that they were working with Mr. Ingram
on that. This resident was given her contact information and
advised to contact her if there were any concerns. There have been
no contacts from this resident.

A copy of the ombudsman report is available for free at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=yCtkOu from PacerMonitor.com.

The ombudsman may be reached at:

     Michele McKay, MNS, RN, CNE
     6360 Kraus Road
     Clarence Center, New York 14032
     Telephone: (716) 907-6045
     Email: momsacct2011@gmail.com

        About Menorah Campus Independent Senior Apartments

Menorah Campus Independent Senior Apartments, Inc. sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
W.D.N.Y. Case No. 25-10135) on February 7, 2025, listing up to
$50,000 in assets and between $100,001 and $500,000 in
liabilities.

Judge Carl L. Bucki presides over the case.

Kevin R. Lelonek, Esq., at Gross Shuman, PC represents the Debtor
as legal counsel.

Michele McKay serves as patient care ombudsman.


MERIT STREET: Committee Taps Berkeley Research as Financial Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Merit Street
Media, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas to hire Berkeley Research Group, LLC as
its financial advisor .

Berkeley Research will provide these services:

   (a) develop strategies to maximize recoveries from the Debtor's
assets;

   (b) monitor liquidity and cash flows throughout the Chapter 11
case;

   (c) prepare and issue financial monitoring reports;

   (d) advise on debtor-in-possession financing arrangements;

   (e) analyze historical and ongoing related-party transactions;

   (f) prepare valuations of the Debtor's assets and intellectual
property;

   (g) advise on employee-related costs;

   (h) review and evaluate court filings and sale processes;

   (i) advise on potential preference payments, fraudulent
conveyances, and other causes of action;

   (j) monitor the Debtor's claims management process;

   (k) analyze and review any proposed plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement; and

   (l) attend Committee meetings, court hearings, and auctions.

BRG will receive compensation at its standard hourly rates,
discounted by 10% for Managing Directors, plus reimbursement of
actual and necessary expenses.

Rates are:

        Managing Directors ($1,140–$1,395, discounted)
        Associate Directors & Directors ($900–$1,100)
        Professional Staff ($445–$885), and
        Support Staff ($185–$395)

Expected engagement leaders include:

        Christopher Kearns        $1,395
        David Galfus              $1,395
        Evan Hengel               $1,250
        Jonathan Emerson          $1,000
        Ben Sheppard              $740

According to court filings, BRG is a "disinterested person" within
the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

   Berkeley Research Group, LLC
   2200 Powell Street, Suite 1200
   Emeryville, CA 94608, US
   Phone: (877) 696-0391

                           About Merit Street Media

Merit Street Media is a television and media content production and
distribution company based in Fort Worth, Texas. It appears to
focus on creating, producing, and distributing television content,
maintaining business relationships with major cable providers
including DIRECTV and DISH Network, as well as numerous television
stations and production companies.

Merit Street Media sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 25-80156) on July 2,
2025, before the Hon. Scott W. Everett. In its petition, the Debtor
reports estimated assets and liabilities between $100 million and
$500 million.

The Debtor is represented by Sidley Austin LLP as bankruptcy
counsel. Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC serves as Claims,
Noticing, and Solicitation Agent, effective as of the Petition
Date.


MERIT STREET: Committee Taps O'Melveny & Myers as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Merit Street
Media, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas to hire O'Melveny & Myers LLP to serve
as its counsel.

The firm will provide these services:

   (a) provide legal advice and services regarding local rules,
practices, and procedures, including Fifth Circuit law;

   (b) advise the Committee with respect to its rights, duties and
powers in the Chapter 11 case;

   (c) assist and advise the Committee in its consultations and
negotiations with the Debtor and other parties in interest relative
to the administration of the Chapter 11 case;

   (d) assist the Committee in analyzing the claims of the Debtor's
creditors and the Debtor’s capital structure and in negotiating
with holders of claims and equity interests;

   (e) assist the Committee in its investigation of the acts,
conduct, assets, liabilities and financial condition of the Debtor
and its insiders and of the operation of the Debtor's businesses;

   (f) assist the Committee in its analysis of, and negotiations
with, the Debtor or any third party concerning matters related to
leases, executory contracts, asset dispositions, financings, and
the terms of reorganization or liquidation plans;

   (g) assist and advise the Committee as to its communications to
the creditor body regarding significant matters in the Chapter 11
case;

   (h) represent the Committee at hearings and other proceedings
before the Court;

   (i) review and analyze applications, orders, statements of
operations, and schedules filed with the Court and advise the
Committee;

   (j) advise and assist the Committee with respect to legislative,
regulatory, or governmental activities;

   (k) assist the Committee in preparing pleadings and
applications;

   (l) prepare, on behalf of the Committee, motions, memoranda,
complaints, objections or other pleadings;

   (m) investigate and analyze any claims and causes of action that
are property of the Debtor's estate; and

   (n) perform such other legal services as required in the
interests of the Committee.

OMM's hourly billing rates are:

        $1,525 - $2,400   -- partners
        $1,295 - $1,525   -- counsel
        $825 - $1,215     -- associates, and
        $250 - $550       -- paraprofessionals

Attorneys expected to lead the engagement are:

        Louis R. Strubeck, Jr. --   $2,100
        Gregory M. Wilkes      --   $1,635
        Julian Gurule          --   $1,595
        Laura L. Smith         --   $1,375 and
        Anna Cosby             --   $825

OMM is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

OMM has also provided the following information addressed in
paragraph D.1 of the U.S. Trustee Guidelines and as set forth in
the Strubeck Declaration:

Question (a): Did you agree to any variations from, or alternatives
to, your standard or customary billing arrangements for this
engagement?

Response: No.

Question (b): Do any of the professionals included in this
engagement vary their rate based on the geographic location of the
bankruptcy case?

Response: No.

Question (c): If you represented the client in the 12 months
pre-petition, disclose your billing rates and material financial
terms for the pre-petition engagement, including any adjustments
during the 12 months pre-petition. If your billing rates and
material financial terms have changed post-petition, explain the
difference and the reasons for the difference.

Response: OMM did not represent the Committee before its
formation.

Question (d): Has your client approved your prospective budget and
staffing plan, and, if so, for what budget period?

Response: The Committee and OMM expect to develop a prospective
budget and staffing plan, recognizing that in the course of large
chapter 11 cases, complex and unexpected issues may arise that may
in turn result in unforeseeable fees and expenses.

The firm can be reached at:

   Louis R. Strubeck, Jr., Esq.
   Gregory M. Wilkes, Esq.
   Laura L. Smith, Esq.
   O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
   2801 North Harwood Street, Suite 1600
   Dallas, TX 75201
   Tel: (972) 360-1900
   Emails: lstrubeckjr@omm.com
           gwilkes@omm.com
           lsmith@omm.com

- and -

   Julian Gurule, Esq.
   O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
   400 South Hope Street, 19th Floor
   Los Angeles, CA 90071
   Tel: (213) 430-6000
   Email: jgurule@omm.com

                 About Merit Street Media

Merit Street Media is a television and media content production and
distribution company based in Fort Worth, Texas. It appears to
focus on creating, producing, and distributing television content,
maintaining business relationships with major cable providers
including DIRECTV and DISH Network, as well as numerous television
stations and production companies.

Merit Street Media sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 25-80156) on July 2,
2025, before the Hon. Scott W. Everett. In its petition, the Debtor
reports estimated assets and liabilities between $100 million and
$500 million.

The Debtor is represented by Sidley Austin LLP as bankruptcy
counsel. Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC serves as Claims,
Noticing, and Solicitation Agent, effective as of the Petition
Date.


MODIVCARE INC: Delays Q2 10-Q for Goodwill Review, Culture Probe
----------------------------------------------------------------
ModivCare Inc. filed a Notification of Late Filing on Form 12b-25
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, informing that it
is unable to file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2025 by the prescribed due date without unreasonable
effort or expense because the Company requires additional time to
complete its ongoing assessment of goodwill for potential
impairment and to report the results of such analysis in its
consolidated interim unaudited financial statements. In addition,
the Company requires additional time to complete an investigation
being conducted by the Company's outside counsel at the direction
of the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors with
respect to compliance hotline allegations, including matters
related to the Company's culture.

                        About ModivCare Inc.

ModivCare Inc. is a technology-enabled healthcare services company
that provides a suite of integrated supportive care solutions for
public and private payors and their members.

At December 31, 2024, ModivCare had 1,654,332,000 in total assets,
1,692,806,000 in total liabilities, and 38,474,000 in total
stockholders' deficit.

                           *     *     *

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter in March 2025, S&P
Global Ratings lowered its Company credit rating on ModivCare Inc.
to 'CCC+' from 'B'. The outlook is negative.



MOUNTAIN VIEW: Hires Condon Tobin as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
Mountain View Midstar, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to hire Condon Tobin
Sladek Thornton Nerenberg PLLC to serve as its legal counsel.

Condon Tobin will provide these services:

   (a) assist the Debtor in preparing its Schedule of Assets and
Liabilities, Statement of Financial Affairs and Monthly Operating
Reports, and otherwise providing the Court and parties in interest
with required financial disclosure;

   (b) attend with the Debtor the initial debtor interview with the
United States Trustee and the 341 meeting of creditors;

   (c) advise the Debtor of its rights, powers and duties as a
debtor and debtor in possession continuing to operate and manage
its business and properties under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code;

   (d) prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary and
appropriate applications, motions, proposed orders, other
pleadings, notices, schedules and other documents, and review all
financial and other reports to be filed in the Bankruptcy Case;

   (e) advise the Debtor concerning, and preparing responses to,
applications, motions, other pleadings, notices and other papers
that may be filed by other parties in the Bankruptcy Case and
appear on behalf of the Debtor in any hearing or other proceedings
relating to those matters;

   (f) advise the Debtor concerning executory contract and
unexpired lease assumptions, assignments and rejections;

   (g) assist the Debtor with obtaining post-petition financing and
its use of cash collateral, as necessary;

   (h) commence and conduct litigation that is necessary and
appropriate to assert rights held by the Debtor, protect assets of
the Debtor's chapter 11 estate or otherwise further the goal of
completing the Debtor's successful reorganization;

   (i) advise the Debtor regarding, and represent the Debtor in,
any prebankruptcy litigation that may be removed to the Court;

   (j) represent the Debtor in any adversary proceeding initiated
by the Debtor or any other party;

   (k) assist the Debtor to retain necessary professionals that
will assist in the reorganization efforts in this Bankruptcy Case;

   (l) respond to inquiries by creditors and other stakeholders of
the Debtor regarding the Bankruptcy Case;

   (m) assist the Debtor in reviewing, estimating and resolving
claims asserted against the Debtor's estate;

   (n) advise and assist the Debtor in negotiations with the
Debtor's debt holders and other stakeholders;

   (o) advise and assist the Debtor in connection with any asset
dispositions;

   (p) advise and assist the Debtor with any compromise and
settlement agreements that it enters into postpetition;

   (q) advise, and represent, the Debtor with respect to employment
related issues;

   (r) advise the Debtor in connection with the formulation,
negotiation and promulgation of a plan or plans of reorganization,
and related transactional documents;

   (s) provide non-bankruptcy services for the Debtor to the extent
requested by the Debtor; and

   (t) perform all other necessary and appropriate legal services
in connection with the Bankruptcy Case for or on behalf of the
Debtor.

Condon Tobin will receive hourly billing rates ranging from $800 to
$500 for attorneys and $250 to $350 for paraprofessionals.

The firm received a $300,000 retainer, with $35,641 applied and a
remaining balance of $264,359.

Condon Tobin is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   H. Joseph Acosta, Esq.
   Jeff Carruth, Esq.
   CONDON TOBIN SLADEK THORNTON NERENBERG PLLC
   8080 Park Lane, Suite 700
   Dallas, TX 75231
   Telephone: (214) 265-3800
   Facsimile: (214) 691-6311
   Email: jacosta@condontobin.com
          jcarruth@condontobin.com

             About Mountain View Midstar LLC  

Joseph Mountain View Midstar LLC is a real estate company that
leases nonresidential properties, including land and other
commercial parcels not classified under traditional building
categories. The Company operates in Hurst, Texas, and is associated
with the Mountain View Mall and Shops at Ardmore.

The Debtor sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 25-42648) on July 22, 2025. In its
petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities
between $10 million and $50 million each.

The Debtor is represented by Joseph Acosta, Esq. at CONDON TOBIN.

United Texas Bank, as lender, is represented by Jason M. Rudd,
Esq., Scott D. Lawrence, Esq., Ethan A. Minshull, Esq., Catherine
A. Curtis, Esq., and Meghan D. Young, Esq., at Wick Phillips Gould
& Martin, LLP, in Dallas, Texas.


NAPA FORD: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------
Napa Valley Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. received another extension
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
California, Santa Rosa Division, to use cash collateral.

At a recent hearing, the court authorized the Debtor to use $60,000
in cash collateral from August 22 to 28 and ordered the Debtor to
disclose its intended use of the funds to Ford Motor Credit
Company.

The existing cash collateral order entered on August 19 remains in
place. The August 19 order approved the payment of $35,410 to Ford
and granted a replacement lien on the Debtor's post-petition
property to the same validity, priority and extent as their
pre-bankruptcy lien and a superpriority claim for Ford.

The next hearing is set for August 28.

Ford Motor Credit Company is represented by:

   Andrew B. Still, Esq.
   Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
   600 Anton Blvd, Suite 1400
   Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7689
   Telephone: 714.427.7000
   Facsimile: 714.427.7799
   astill@swlaw.com

                About Napa Valley Ford Lincoln Mercury Inc.

Napa Valley Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No.
25-10450) on July 24, 2025, listing between $1 million and $10
million in both assets and laibilities.

Judge Hon. Charles Novack oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   Michael Jay Berger, Esq.
   Law Offices Of Michael Jay Berger
   Email: michael.berger@bankruptcypower.com


NB MOUNTAIN: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------
NB Mountain Valley, DST and NB Mountain Valley LeaseCo, LLC ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
for authority to use cash collateral and provide adequate
protection.

DST owns the Mountain Valley Apartments, a student and
professional-oriented residential complex located in Morgantown,
West Virginia, near West Virginia University. The complex offers
furnished and unfurnished apartments and luxury amenities. LeaseCo
leases the property from DST under a Master Lease and subleases
individual units to tenants. LeaseCo also receives management
services from Nelson Brothers Property Management, Inc. under a
Management Agreement.

Fannie Mae is the senior secured lender to DST, asserting a claim
of approximately $23.67 million under a 2017 multifamily loan
secured by a deed of trust and other loan documents. DST also holds
a first priority lien on LeaseCo's assets. Fannie Mae's collateral
includes cash, real estate, rents, and other assets. Monthly
payments of $176,793.46 were historically made but due to
operational and financial strains starting in 2024 including rent
collection timing and rising expenses—the Debtors began making
partial or delayed payments. In December 2024, Fannie Mae claimed a
$460,000 past due balance and began withholding payments in a
suspense account until the arrears were resolved.
On February 12, 2025, Fannie Mae declared a default. It initiated a
receivership action in federal court on March 31, resulting in the
appointment of a receiver on May 12. The receiver scheduled a
foreclosure sale.

The Debtors assert that the foreclosure would primarily benefit
Fannie Mae and harm other stakeholders, including tenants and
unsecured creditors. The Mountain Valley Complex was appraised at
$34 million in 2017 (with excess land valued at $3.9 million),
suggesting a significant equity cushion over the $23.67 million
loan. The Chapter 11 filing aims to facilitate either a
reorganization or a value-maximizing sale of the property under
court supervision.

As of the petition date, Fannie Mae was allegedly holding over
$905,000 in DST's funds in a suspense account. The receiver has not
filed financial reports, and the Debtors are uncertain of the
current cash balance.

The Debtors seek emergency authority to use cash collateral to
continue operations, preserve estate value, maintain services and
staffing, and meet critical expenses. Without this relief, they
would be unable to operate the complex, pay employees, utilities,
or other essential costs.

The Debtors propose using the cash collateral in accordance with a
budget and offer adequate protection to Fannie Mae, including
adequate protection liens on all post-petition assets to cover any
diminution in Fannie Mae's collateral value and continued monthly
interest payments at the non-default rate in accordance with loan
documents
They argue this protection, combined with the equity cushion and
the funds in the suspense account, is sufficient to safeguard
Fannie Mae's interests.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=0e6IAy
from PacerMonitor.com.


             About NB Mountain Valley, DST

NB Mountain Valley, DST owns the Mountain Valley Apartments, a
student- and professional-oriented residential complex located in
Morgantown, West Virginia, near West Virginia University.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. W.V. Case No. 5:25-bk-00456) on August
19, 2025. In the petition signed by Patrick Nelson, principal, the
Debtor disclosed up to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.

Stephen L. Thompson, Esq., at Barth & Thompson, represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.

Fannie Mae, as creditor, is represented by:

   Jeffrey G. Wilhelm, Esq.
   Jessica M. Barnes, Esq.
   Reed Smith, LLP
   Reed Smith Centre
   225 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1200
   Pittsburgh, PA 15222
   Telephone: (412) 288-3131
   Facsimile: (412) 288-3063
   jwilhelm@reedsmith.com
   jbarnes@reedsmith.com


NEAL MEATS: Case Summary & Two Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Neal Meats, LLC
        1256 Winningham Road
        Seymour MO 65746

Business Description: Neal Meats, LLC provides USDA-inspected meat
                      processing services from its facility in
                      Seymour, Missouri, where it handles beef,
                      pork, and deer for both custom and USDA
                      markets.  Founded in 2020 by Will and Julia
                      Neal, the Company operates a 9,500-square-
                      foot plant equipped with advanced cooling
                      systems, vacuum packaging machines, and
                      smoking equipment for specialty products
                      such as sausages and bacon.  The business
                      serves farmers, ranchers, and individual
                      customers across the region, emphasizing
                      product quality, food safety, and secure
                      handling.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 21, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Missouri

Case No.: 25-60458

Debtor's Counsel: James B. James, Esq.
                  JB JAMES LAW FIRM
                  313 S. Glenstone Avenue
                  Springfield MO 65802
                  Tel:(417) 886-6500
                  Email: jimjames@jbjameslawfirm.com

Debtor's
Realtor/Broker:   DUSTY CAPON

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by William Neal as managing member.

A copy of the Debtor's list of two unsecured creditors is available
for free on PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/NXGULXQ/Neal_Meats_LLC__mowbke-25-60458__0035.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/TIXSTSQ/Neal_Meats_LLC__mowbke-25-60458__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


NIKOPAT & ASSOCIATES: Hires Sold 100 as Real Estate Broker
----------------------------------------------------------
Nikopat & Associates, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to employ Sold 100 Real Estate
Inc. as its real estate broker, with Mr. Billy Okoye serving as
listing broker.

Sold 100 Real Estate Inc. will provide these services:

   (a) act as the Debtor's real estate broker for the sale of 7225
Hanover Parkway, Suite D, Greenbelt, MD 20770;

   (b) render the necessary professional brokerage services, with
Billy Okoye as Broker/Agent, to the Debtor with respect to the
property; and

   (c) handle the sale and marketing of the property as listing
agent.

The Debtor has agreed to compensate Sold 100 Real Estate Inc. on a
percentage basis in accordance with its ordinary and customary
rates. For the sale of the property, the Debtor has agreed to pay
no more than six percent of the sales price, which commission may
be split with a buyer's agent at settlement unless otherwise
agreed.

The firm will be paid from the proceeds of the sale, subject to
court approval, and has not received a retainer.

Sold 100 Real Estate Inc. does not hold or represent an interest
adverse to the estate and is a "disinterested person" within the
meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   Billy Okoye
   Sold 100 Real Estate Inc.
   7500 Greenway Center Dr., Ste. 150
   Greenbelt, MD 20770

                            About Nikopat & Associates, Inc.

Nikopat & Associates, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 24-17524) on September
6, 2024.

At the time of the filing, Debtor had estimated assets of between
$100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of between $500,001 and $1
million.

Judge Lori S. Simpson oversees the case.

The Iweanoges' Firm, P.C. serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


NORTH WHITEVILLE: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
North Whiteville Urgent Care & Family Practice, PA received third
interim approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, Wilmington Division to use cash
collateral.

The Debtor may use cash collateral as set forth in the budget
covering August 1 to 31, with 10% line-item variance.

The Debtor projects total operational expenses of $155,768.

As adequate protection, the pre-petition liens of secured creditors
will extend to post-petition assets, but only to the extent liens
were valid, perfected, and enforceable pre-petition. The Debtor
reserves the right to challenge the validity and priority of such
liens.

The order remains effective until Aug. 31, unless terminated
earlier or modified.

                 About North Whiteville Urgent Care
                       & Family Practice PA

North Whiteville Urgent Care & Family Practice, PA is a medical
services provider.

North Whiteville sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 25-02217) on June 12,
2025, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge David M. Warren handles the case.

The Debtor tapped Christian B. Felden, Esq., at Felden & Felden, PA
as legal counsel and Streeter Tax Consultants as accountant.


NORTHVOLT AB: Lyten to Secure Carmaker Support for Co's Revival
---------------------------------------------------------------
Marie Mannes, Alessandro Parodi and Gilles Guillaume of Reuters
report that Silicon Valley battery startup Lyten faces skepticism
from automakers as it takes over assets of bankrupt Swedish battery
maker Northvolt, with industry experts warning that full-scale
European production will remain uncertain for years. Lyten, which
develops lithium-sulfur batteries, said on August 7, 2025 it
acquired Northvolt's facilities at a steep discount.

According to the report, the move could revive hopes for a European
battery champion, but investors and customers burned by Northvolt's
collapse remain cautious, saying they want proof Lyten can deliver
consistent production at scale.

The company will continue Northvolt's lithium-ion output while
advancing its own lithium-sulfur cells, a lighter and cheaper
alternative that reduces reliance on Chinese minerals but remains
in early stages. CEO Dan Cook said Lyten hopes to regain
Northvolt's former clients, including Volkswagen brands, by proving
performance with a single pilot customer, according to Reuters.

Carmakers have been hesitant, the report points out.  BMW, which
canceled a €2 billion order with Northvolt last 2024, said
battery supply deals require long lead times, while Volvo declined
to comment. Scania called it "too early" to consider orders.
Stellantis, which owns a 2% stake in Lyten, said any agreements
would depend on validation, scale-up and local production, the
report states.

Northvolt collapsed in March with $8 billion in debt after losing
orders and investor support, despite ramping output at its Swedish
plant. Its downfall highlights the financial and technical risks
facing European battery makers amid softer EV demand and heavy
reliance on secured debt, according to report.

Lyten says the acquisition could accelerate large-scale
lithium-sulfur production to 2028, but experts caution the
technology is unlikely to be viable for EVs before 2030. Analysts
warn that without sustained government subsidies and fresh
investment, Europe's battery ambitions could again falter.

                About Northvolt AB

Northvolt AB was established in 2016 in Stockholm, Sweden.
Pioneering a sustainable model for battery manufacturing, the
company has received orders from several leading automotive
companies. The company is currently delivering batteries from its
first gigafactory, Northvolt Ett, in Skelleftea, Sweden and from
its R&D and industrialization campus, Northvolt Labs, in Vasteras,
Sweden.

On Nov. 21, 2024, Northvolt AB and eight affiliated debtors filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 24-90577).

The cases are before the Honorable Alfredo R. Perez.

Northvolt is being advised by Teneo as its restructuring and
communications advisor. Kirkland & Ellis LLP, A&O Shearman and
Mannheimer Swartling Advokatbyra AB are serving as legal counsel.
The company has also engaged Rothschild & Co to run its marketing
process. Stretto is the claims agent.


OMEGA INVESTIGATION: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Puerto Rico
---------------------------------------------------------------
On August 15, 2025, Omega Investigation Services Corp. filed
Chapter 11 protection in the District of Puerto Rico. According to
court filing, the Debtor reports between $500,000 and $1 million
in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will
be available to unsecured creditors.

         About Omega Investigation Services Corp.

Omega Investigation Services Corp. is a company presumably
providing investigation and security-related services based in San
Juan, Puerto Rico.

Omega Investigation Services Corp. sought relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 25-03647) on
August 15, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated
assets between $100,000 and $500,000 and estimated asset $500,000
and $1 million.

The Debtor is represented by Alexis Fuentes-Hernandez, Esq. at
Fuentes Law Offices, LLC.


OREGON CLEAN: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings upgraded its rating on Oregon Clean Energy LLC's
(OCE) term loan B (TLB) to 'BB' from 'BB-'.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation of increased
debt service coverage over the TLB and post-refinancing periods
based on our assumptions and forward-looking view of the energy and
capacity prices in PJM's ATSI zone. We forecast approximately $100
million of debt due at maturity.

"Additionally, our outlook reflects OCE's credit supportive 75%
sweep mechanism, high dispatch levels, and an average forced outage
rate in-line with other combined cycle gas turbines (CCGTs) in
North America.

"We do not expect the project to increase leverage or otherwise
amend any terms of the current financing ahead of acquisition
consummation."

OCE is an 870-megawatt (MW) combined-cycle, gas-fired power plant
in Oregon, Ohio, and the American Transmission Systems Inc. (ATSI)
zone of the PJM market. Ares EIF and I-Squared Capital own the
project through a 50-50 joint venture.

S&P said, "OCE has benefited from a strong energy market in 2025, a
trend we expect could continue as demand grows. Our forecast
continues to assume robust levels of dispatch in the near-term and
more conservative spark spreads. As of June 2025, OCE realized a
year-to-date (YTD) spark spread of about $21/MWh, significantly
higher than our forecast and demonstrative of a favorable market
environment in the American Transmission Systems Inc. (ATSI) region
of PJM. Although it is difficult to quantify the individual
contributors of OCE's increased profitability, we believe the
strong sparks over 2025 are due to a mixture of growing demand,
weather conditions, and gas prices remaining relatively controlled
during times of high load. As demand continues to grow in PJM, we
believe it is possible for this dynamic to continue over the coming
years.

"Although pricing has remained strong over 2025, generation has
been below our expectations. Through June, OCE has achieved a
capacity factor of 74%, which is 10% lower than our forecast. We
note, however, that the lower generation is not attributable to
market factors but rather a forced outage that occurred over March
and April. Outside of these two months, OCE has operated at a
capacity factor of over 90%. Even with generation below our
forecast, OCE's expanded profitability has enabled the project to
decrease leverage on par with our expectations.

"We expect OCE will continue to benefit from higher capacity prices
engendered by the supply and demand imbalance in the PJM capacity
market. The current cap and floor on prices, which is set to
persist through the next uncleared auction, also provides increased
cash flow visibility. Clearing at $329/MW-day, the pricing signals
in the most recent capacity auction emphasize the current market
tightness as demand continues to grow (mainly due to data centers)
while supply remains limited (due to few new sources of capacity
over the near term). We expect this dynamic will remain over the
next several years and revised our in-house capacity prices
incrementally upward.

"The price cap and floor of $175/MW-day to $325/MW-day, which is
set to continue through the 2027–2028 auction, also provides a
source of cash flow visibility. We incorporate this construct, as
well as our view on potential stresses to future prices, in our
assessment of OCE's market risk. Although capacity prices have also
historically displayed volatility, we view capacity cash flows,
which have grown as a portion of OCE's cash flow profile, as being
somewhat more stable than energy margin. Considering these factors
and the decline in cash flow over our defined stress period, we
revised OCE's market risk assessment from 'High (4)' to 'High (3)',
and, as a result, it's OPBA from '10' to '9'.

"Operational risk is more pronounced for OCE when compared to
larger, diversified multi-asset portfolios. In our view, the forced
outage that occurred in March–April of this year exemplifies the
concentration of operational risk inherent to a single asset. In
mid-March, a control valve failed in the project's steam turbine
generator. The forced outage lasted for about a month, and capacity
factors over March and April were in the 30% range. If OCE had not
realized such robust sparks in the first quarter and later part of
the second quarter, coverage could have been more adversely
affected, and the project may have lagged our cash sweep
expectations.

"Over 2018–2024, the project's EFORd averaged about 4.2%, which
we view as being broadly in line with the average EFORd for CCGTs
across the United States. Despite recent and historic outages, we
believe the plant is generally well-managed and maintained. We also
believe that after outages, such as those that occurred in 2022
during Winter Storm Elliot, the project has taken comprehensive
steps to prevent such issues from reoccurring. In the context of
the most recent outage, the facility is conducting weekly
functional test of valves."

OCE also benefits from property and business interruption insurance
of about $25 million in addition to repairs of the gas turbines
being covered under the project's long term service agreement
(LTSA) with Siemens, the original equipment manufacturer (OEM).
Additionally, the project's $40 million revolving credit facility
(RCF) provides interim liquidity to cover debt service and expenses
in the event of an outage until other proceeds could be received.

S&P said, "Our minimum DSCR forecast of 2.53x occurs over the TLB
period, which is a function of relatively conservative leverage and
project's strong de-leveraging prior to the TLB's maturity in 2030
via its supportive 75% cash flow sweep mechanism. At the time the
project executed its amend and extend transaction, leverage was in
the $470/KW range, which we view as relatively modest when compared
to recent transactions in PJM. Additionally, the project continues
to benefit from a flat 75% sweep and target debt balance mechanism,
features we view as more credit supportive in comparison to sweep
structures we have seen in recent transactions as power and
capacity markets have tightened and credit terms have become less
restrictive in response.

"We now forecast about $100 million of the original TLB to be due
at maturity, which we model as being repaid via a fully amortizing,
sculpted structure through our assumed asset life of 2043. Due to
the low debt balance at maturity and the cash flows available over
the remainder of asset life, DSCRs are materially higher in the
post-refinancing period; the median DSCR over our forecast is about
3.8x. We will continue to monitor the project's ability to meet our
sweep expectations, which will influence coverage both over the
life of the TLB and in the post-refinancing period.

"We expect OCE's debt to be repaid in early 2026 assuming
successful sale to utility I&M. In early 2025, the sponsors reached
an agreement to sell OCE to I&M. Our conversations with the
sponsors indicate that the transaction is moving through the
appropriate regulatory channels, with no delays in the regulatory
process currently anticipated. We will continue to surveil the
rating until the deal closes and we receive confirmation that the
project level debt has been repaid.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation of high dispatch
levels, minimal forced outages, and elevated energy and capacity
prices that provide for strong coverage over the TLB and
post-refinancing periods in addition to meaningful debt reduction
via the project's credit-supportive sweep mechanism. We expect
these dynamics will persist until the transaction closes and OCE's
project-level debt is repaid. We do not expect the project will
attempt to increase leverage or otherwise amend the terms of the
existing financing ahead of the acquisition being consummated."

S&P could consider a negative rating action if OCE is unable to
maintain DSCRs above 2.5x on a sustained basis in either the TLB
period or the post-refinancing period. This could occur if:

-- The project experiences weaker realized spark spreads, lower
PJM capacity prices, and unplanned outages substantially affect
generation;

-- Economic factors cause the power plants to dispatch materially
less than S&P's base-case expectation; or

-- The project's excess cash flows do not translate into expected
debt paydowns.

Additionally, S&P's could take a negative rating action on OCE if
leverage increases or the terms of the existing financing are
otherwise amended in a way that weakens its current view of OCE's
credit quality.

Given the volatility inherent to operating as a merchant generator,
an improvement in coverage alone would not be sufficient for S&P's
to take a positive rating action on OCE.

Although highly unlikely, in addition to maintaining coverage of
over 4x in the TLB and post-refinancing period, OCE would need to
benefit from additional cash flow visibility. This could result
from a more extensive hedging program, contracting part of the
plant's capacity, or locking in a significant portion of future
capacity cash flows via bilateral sales with high-quality
counterparties.



ORIGIN FOOD: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------
Origin Food Group, LLC got the green light from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Stateville
Division, to use cash collateral.

At its recent hearing, the court granted the Debtor's bid to use
cash collateral on an interim basis and set a further hearing for
September 10.

Several creditors claim secured interests based on a list of UCC
Financing Statements on file with the North Carolina Secretary of
State. These secured creditors include banks and equipment
financiers such as Branch Banking & Trust, International Financial
Services Corporation, Treemount Holding, Longitude 80 Dairies,
DariFill, The Huntington National Bank, Goodman Capital Finance,
First Commonwealth Equipment Finance, and others.

Origin Food Group asserts that all creditors are adequately
protected, noting that the continued use of cash collateral in the
ordinary course of business preserves the going concern value of
the company, thereby maintaining or even enhancing the value of the
creditors' collateral.

Origin Food Group offers to grant secured creditors replacement
liens on post-petition assets, with the same extent, priority, and
validity as the original pre-petition liens.

                 About Origin Food Group LLC

Origin Food Group, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. N.C. Case No. 25-50268) on August
20, 2025. In the petition signed by Halil Ulukaya, president, the
Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Laura T. Beyer oversees the case.

John C. Woodman, Esq., at Essex Richards PA, represents the Debtor
as legal counsel.


PARTY CITY: Reaches Nearly $4MM Settlement w/ Former Employees
--------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf of Bloomberg Law reports that Party City Holdco Inc. has
agreed to a nearly $4 million settlement with former corporate
employees who were abruptly laid off last 2024 as the retailer
filed for bankruptcy and announced plans to shut down operations.

Under the agreement, 394 former headquarters employees who joined
the lawsuit will each receive $10,100 in priority claims. The
settlement, detailed in documents filed on August 22, 2025 in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, also
includes additional payments from confidential insurance policies.

                     About Party City Holdco

Party City Holdco Inc. (NYSE: PRTY) is the global leader in the
celebrations' industry, with its offerings spanning more than 70
countries around the world. It is also the largest designer,
manufacturer, distributor, and retailer of party goods in North
America. Party City Holdco had 761 company-owned stores as of
September 2022. It is headquartered in Woodcliff Lake, N.J. with
additional locations throughout the Americas and Asia.

Party City Holdco and its domestic subsidiaries sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead
Case No. 24-90621) on Dec. 21, 2024. As of Petition date, the
Debtor estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in both assets and
liabilities. The petitions were signed by Deborah Rieger-Paganis as
chief restructuring officer.

Judge Alfredo R Perez oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP,
and Porter Hedges LLP as legal counsel; AlixPartners, LLP as
financial advisor; A&G Realty Partners as real estate advisor; and
Kroll as the claims agent. Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC and
Gordon Brothers Commercial & Industrial, LLC represents the Debtors
as Store Closing Advisor.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 6 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases. The
committee is represented by Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP.


PIONEER HEALTH: Opposes Investment Banker's $500K Fee Request
-------------------------------------------------------------
Emlyn Cameron of Law360 reports that clinic operator Pioneer Health
Systems LLC, which won confirmation of its Chapter 11 plan in late
2024, is opposing a $500,000 fee request from its former investment
banker, arguing the payment was tied to a sale that was never
completed.

             About Pioneer Health Systems, LLC

Pioneer Health Systems, LLC, is the parent company for the
following brands: Surgical Hospital of Oklahoma, L.L.C. (SHO),
Direct Orthopedic Care (DOC), and Integrated Care Technologies
(ICT). Combined, this model allows Pioneer to offer a complete
vertical orthopedic healthcare system.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
24-10279) on Feb. 21, 2024, with $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities. Colin Chenault, chief financial officer,
signed the petition.

Judge J. Kate Stickles oversees the case.

Alessandra Glorioso, Esq., at Dorsey & Whitney (Delaware), LLP, is
the Debtor's legal counsel.


POSH QUARTERS: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
-------------------------------------------
POSH Quarters, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for authority to use
cash collateral and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor filed for bankruptcy on August 8 and is currently in
default on two loans held by BSI Financial, which are secured by
real property located at 3 S 21st Ave and 624 N 6th Ave in
Jacksonville Beach, Florida. The total debt to BSI Financial
amounts to approximately $1.07 million. These loans are secured by
cash collateral, including rents, receivables, bank account funds,
and other business assets.

The Debtor asserts that the inability to access and use this cash
would result in the immediate shutdown of business operations as it
would prevent the payment of critical post-petition expenses such
as property taxes, insurance, and ongoing operational costs.

To protect the interests of BSI Financial, the Debtor proposes
granting the lender a replacement lien on all post-petition assets
of similar nature, priority, and extent as existed pre-petition.

In the proposed interim order, the Debtor is allowed to use cash
collateral only for necessary business expenses and is prohibited
from making payments to insiders, professionals, or pre-petition
obligations without court approval. The Debtor must also maintain
insurance coverage and make adequate protection payments to BSI in
the amounts of $3,605 and $1,732.50 per month for the two
properties, beginning October 1.

A nine-month budget covering September 2025 through May 2026
forecasts consistent monthly gross sales of $8,000, with increases
to $12,000 in December and January. Monthly expenses average around
$2,500, with an additional $1,000 allocated to Subchapter V trustee
fees and, starting in October, $5,337 in unsecured plan payments.

A copy of the motion is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=RzA0tY
from PacerMonitor.com.

                       About Posh Quarters

Posh Quarters, LLC filed a petition under Chapter 11, Subchapter V
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 25-02748) on
August 8, 2025, with $1,178,812 in assets and $1,639,809 in
liabilities. Lisa Adams, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Jason A. Burgess presides over the case.

Bryan K. Mickler, Esq., at the Law Offices of Mickler & Mickler,
LLP represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.



PRIMO BRANDS: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Pos.
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed the 'BB-' rating on Primo Brands Corp.
(Primo Brands) and the 'BB' and 'B' senior secured and senior
unsecured issue-level ratings, respectively. The recovery rating on
the senior secured first-lien debt is '2', reflecting substantial
recovery in the event of a payment default (70%--90%; rounded
estimate 70%) and '6' on the senior unsecured debt, reflecting
negligible recovery in the event of a payment default (0%--10%;
rounded estimate 0%).

The outlook is positive, reflecting S&P's expectation that the
company will achieve and sustain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
leverage below 4x in 2025 and thereafter baring significant
integration challenges or larger-than-expected shareholder
returns.

Primo Brands, largest shareholder, One Rock Capital Partners LLC
(Triton Water Holdings Inc.'s former financial sponsor) reduced its
ownership below 40% in the first half of 2025. S&P said, "As a
result, we no longer consider the company financial sponsor-owned
and now calculate S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt on a net-of-cash
basis. However, we forecast share repurchases will increase in 2025
to offset dilution after the company announced a $250 million share
repurchase authorization, resulting in negative discretionary cash
flow (DCF) for the year."

Additionally, the company reported weaker-than-expected second
quarter results and lowered its sales, EBITDA, and cash flow
guidance for 2025. S&P now expects S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
EBITDA of about $1.48 billion compared with $1.64 billion and
reported free operating cash flow (FOCF) of $318 million compared
with $381 million.

S&P said, "Nonetheless, we continue to expect S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage of 3.6x in 2025 and 3.3x in 2026, versus
our prior expectation of 3.5x and 3.2x respectively, despite our
lower EBITDA forecast since we now calculate debt net of cash."

S&P now expects lower net sales, EBITDA, and FOCF because of
integration challenges. On its second-quarter earnings call, Primo
Brands reported weaker-than-expected results, including comparable
net sales declining 2.5%, largely because of unanticipated
integration challenges. Accelerated consolidation of facilities and
headcount reduction led to operational disruptions, including
supply chain inefficiencies and shortages, as well as IT issues
stemming from transitioning legacy Primo Water onto BlueTriton's
SAP. This ultimately negatively impacted large-format water
delivery sales, resulting in certain supply and component shortages
that led to recurring missed or delayed deliveries, weak service
levels and net customer exits.

As a result, management lowered its full-year guidance,
anticipating disruptions will also hinder third-quarter net sales
before normalizing in the fourth quarter after rectifying the
problems. S&P said, "Furthermore, we believe the disruptions were
largely self-inflicted and driven by the accelerated pace of
integration rather than discovery of underlying structural issues
between the two businesses. As such, we do not expect these
challenges to compromise or materially delay the realization of
planned synergies. We continue to expect the company will realize
$200 million in cost synergies in 2025, the majority of which we
assume will occur in the second half of 2025, and $100 million in
cost synergies in 2026."

In addition to integration-related challenges, Primo Brands faced
several one-off events in the second quarter that further pressured
net sales and EBITDA. S&P said, "As disruptions ease and the
company addresses operational issues, we expect third-quarter net
sales to improve sequentially from the second quarter and expect
revenue to grow in the fourth quarter. Ultimately, we now forecast
EBITDA to be about $160 million below prior expectations due to
flat net sales and weaker operating leverage, which we estimate has
about a 0.3x negative impact on leverage."

S&P said, "We no longer view Primo Brands as being
financial-sponsor owned, which is a credit positive because we now
calculate debt net of cash. One Rock now owns about 30% of the
common equity of Primo Brands and holds three seats on the board of
directors (excluding Dean Metropoulos) after incrementally selling
down its ownership stake throughout the first half of the year.
This is positive for credit quality because we expect the company
to maintain a less aggressive financial policy with more of a focus
on debt reduction. Primo Brands has communicated a medium-term net
leverage target of 2.0x-2.5x on a company-defined basis, which we
believe currently equates to S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage
of 3.0x-3.5x. As a result of One Rock's ownership declining below
40% coupled with our fair assessment of Primo Brands' business risk
profile, we now calculate S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt on a
net-of-cash basis. This reflects our view that the risk of the
company deploying significant excess cash for shareholder returns
has diminished compared with when it was more directly controlled
by One Rock, especially considering its history of debt-financed
dividends when it owned Triton.

"We continue to forecast S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage in
the mid-3x area in 2025 and 2026. We now project leverage of 3.6x
in 2025 and 3.3x in 2026, compared with our prior expectations of
3.5x and 3.2x, respectively, because we expect lower EBITDA to be
partially offset by lower S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt, given
solid cash on hand. Despite recent operating underperformance, we
maintain our view that there is positive ratings potential if the
company meets our second-half forecast, barring any significant
integration issues or operational disruptions that would prompt a
downward revision to our forecast.

"Moreover, despite heightened macroeconomic uncertainty in 2025, we
believe Primo Brands was not significantly impacted by consumer
trade-down to private-label products in the first half of the year
as it gained market share in bottled water. We continue to believe
PureLife, the company's billion-dollar national brand, resonates
with consumers as a relatively affordable product similar to
private-label, and that its regional spring water brands benefit
from solid brand loyalty. Moreover, substantially all of the
company's regional brands are priced at discounts to products such
as Dasani and Aquafina. Lastly, we continue to expect the category
to benefit from trends like health and wellness, premiumization of
water, and convenience.

"We forecast weaker DCF in 2025 and 2026 due to increased share
repurchases. In 2025, we forecast negative DCF of $153 million due
to our expectation for about $321 million in share repurchases to
offset stock price dilution from One Rock's stock sale. This
includes roughly $220 million of stock repurchases year to date as
of June 30, 2025, and our expectation for an additional $100
million of repurchases in the second half of 2025. In August, the
board approved a $250 million share repurchase program to offset
dilution from previous and potential One Rock sales, as well as for
opportunistic repurchases. As such, we expect the company to use a
portion of this ($100 million) in 2025, and the remaining amount
($150 million) in 2026. We expect the share repurchase program to
be exhausted in 2026 because we believe the company may then refine
its capital allocation strategy once integration is complete. This
could include future increases to shareholder returns given solid
cash on hand and cash generation, which could pressure leverage.
Ultimately, though, we estimate the level of anticipated share
repurchases in 2025 and 2026 to have only a modest impact on
leverage and be small compared with the substantial reduction in
One Rock's ownership stake."

Integration could result in elevated leverage if executed
unsuccessfully. While the company has largely completed integration
of its physical infrastructure and workforce, three remaining
phases--which are all focused on technology--still pose risks to
our forecast, specifically timely synergy realization. S&P said,
"Following second-quarter disruptions, we expect a more cautious
integration approach from management over the next 18 months. We
expect the company to hold elevated inventory on hand to hedge
against potential future disruptions."

S&P said, "Additionally, we continue to expect the company to
migrate legacy Primo Water systems onto Triton's enterprise
resource planning (ERP) platform, which was implemented after
Triton's separation from Nestlé. While Triton previously
experienced supply chain disruptions during its ERP
rollout--impacting fill rates and prompting some retailer
destocking--it recovered volume quickly, demonstrating a credible
track record. Still, risks related to higher costs, increased
capital expenditure (capex), or delays in synergy capture could
result in leverage elevated above 4x.

"The positive outlook reflects our expectation for S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA growth and solid cash generation as Primo
Brands realizes operational efficiencies with greater scale and
diversification of revenues, leading to S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
debt to EBITDA of 3.6x by the end of 2025. It also reflects the
assumption that the company will exercise a prudent financial
policy, particularly with respect to share repurchases."

S&P could revise the outlook to stable if it expects Primo Brands
to sustain leverage above 4x. This could occur if:

-- Performance is weaker than we expect because of integration
problems, and it takes longer to realize cost synergies;

-- The company prioritizes shareholder returns over deleveraging,
including repurchasing shares from its former financial sponsor and
pursuing opportunistic buybacks;

-- Revenue is weaker than S&P expects due to unfavorable weather
or additional one-off natural disasters; or

-- Competition from its financially stronger, global branded or
store brand rivals intensifies.

S&P could raise the rating within the next 12 months if:

-- Primo Brands achieves operational improvements and cost
synergies such that it reaches and sustains S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage below 4x; and

-- It demonstrates a disciplined financial policy and prioritizes
leverage reduction over share repurchases, dividends, and
acquisitions.



PROSPECT MEDICAL: Mayor Wants Non-Profit Buyer for Waterbury
------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Hughes of CT Insider reports that Waterbury Mayor Paul K.
Pernerewski Jr. expressed concern Thursday, August 21, 2025, about
the possibility of another for-profit company acquiring Waterbury
Hospital through a bankruptcy auction following Prospect Medical
Holdings Inc.'s ownership.

According to the report, Pernerewski said he would prefer to see
the hospital return to nonprofit control after nearly a decade
under Prospect's private equity-backed ownership, which he argued
prioritized profit over patient care. "We just went through this
awful experience with Waterbury Hospital over the last few years,
and I think that has left a bad taste in everyone's mouth," he
said. "A not-for-profit would be more focused on providing services
rather than extracting money."

A Prospect attorney advised a Texas judge overseeing the
California-based hospital chain's Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding
on Wednesday, August 20, 2025, that an auction for Waterbury
Hospital, Manchester Memorial Hospital and Rockville General
Hospital in Vernon had been scheduled for Sept. 30, with a court
hearing to seek final approval of the sales planned for Oct. 3, the
report further related.

Prospect lead attorney Thomas Califano also reported to Judge
Stacey Jernigan that the company would name potential buyers for
its three Connecticut hospitals, the report added. The only bidder
that has been named is NOR Healthcare Systems Corp., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Healthcare Systems of America, a for-profit firm with
a troubled history of failing to pay its bills on time and not
repairing its hospitals.

A full-text copy of the CT Insider story is available at
https://tinyurl.com/3p5284xh

            About Prospect Medical Holdings

Prospect Medical Holdings owns Roger Williams Medical Center, Our
Lady of Fatima Hospital, and several other healthcare facilities.

Prospect Medical sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 25-80002) on Jan.
11, 2025. In the petition filed by Paul Rundell, as chief
restructuring officer, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
between $1 billion and $10 billion each.

Bankruptcy Judge Stacey G. Jernigan handles the case.

The Debtors' General Bankruptcy Counsel is Thomas R. Califano,
Esq., and Rakhee V. Patel, Esq., at Sidley Austin LLP, in Dallas,
Texas, and William E. Curtin, Esq., Patrick Venter, Esq., and Anne
G. Wallice, Esq., at Sidley Austin LLP, in New York.

The Debtors' Financial Advisor is ALVAREZ & MARSAL NORTH AMERICA,
LLC.

The Debtors' Investment Banker is HOULIHAN LIKEY, INC.

The Debtors' Claims, Noticing & Solicitation Agent is OMNI AGENT
SOLUTIONS, INC.




PUERTO RICO: Board Shake-Up May Not Bring PREPA Bond Payments
-------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Archer of Law360 reports that President Donald Trump's removal
of nearly the entire board handling Puerto Rico's debt
restructuring could create a panel more favorable to the island's
electric utility bondholders, but experts caution that full
repayment is unlikely.

                  About Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth in association with
the United States. The chief of state is the President of the
United States of America. The head of government is an elected
Governor. There are two legislative chambers: the House of
Representatives, 51 seats, and the Senate, 27 seats. The
governor-elect is Ricardo Antonio Rossello Nevares, the son of
former governor Pedro Rossello.

In 2016, the U.S. Congress passed PROMESA, which, among other
things, created the Financial Oversight and Management Board and
imposed an automatic stay on creditor lawsuits against the
government, which expired May 1, 2017.

The members of the oversight board are: (i) Andrew G. Biggs, (ii)
Jose B. Carrion III, (iii) Carlos M. Garcia, (iv) Arthur J.
Gonzalez, (v) Jose R. Gonzalez, (vi) Ana. J. Matosantos, and (vii)
David A. Skeel Jr.

On May 3, 2017, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico filed a petition
for relief under Title III of the Puerto Rico Oversight,
Management, and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA). The case is
pending in the United States District Court for the District of
Puerto Rico under case number 17-cv-01578. A copy of Puerto Rico
PROMESA petition is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/1701578-00001.pdf     

On May 5, 2017, the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
(COFINA) commenced a case under Title III of PROMESA (D.P.R. Case
No. 17-01599). Joint administration has been sought for the Title
III cases.

On May 21, 2017, two more agencies‚ Employees
Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico and Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (Case
Nos. 17-01685 and 17-01686) commenced Title III cases.

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts named U.S. District Judge Laura
Taylor Swain to preside over the Title III cases.

The Oversight Board has hired as advisors, Proskauer Rose LLP and
Neill & Borges LLC as legal counsel, McKinsey & Co. as strategic
consultant, Citigroup Global Markets as municipal investment
banker, and Ernst & Young, as financial advisor.

Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Scott K. Rutsky, Esq., and Philip M.
Abelson, Esq., of Proskauer Rose LLP; and Hermann D. Bauer, Esq.,
at O'Neill & Borges LLC are onboard as attorneys.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent. Prime Clerk
maintains the case Web site
https://cases.primeclerk.com/puertorico

Jones Day is serving as counsel to certain ERS bondholders.

Paul Weiss is counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of Puerto Rico General
Obligation Bondholders.


QUILL 115: Section 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on September 24
--------------------------------------------------------------
On August 22, 2025, Quill 115 LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in
the Middle District of Florida. According to court filing, the
Debtor reports between $10 million and $50 million in debt owed to
1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.

A meeting of creditors under Section 341)(a) to be held September
24, 2025 at 11:30 a.m. Filed by U.S. Trustee United States
Trustee.

         About Quill 115 LLC

Quill 115 LLC is a real estate development company based in Tampa,
Florida, that is involved in land acquisition, site planning, and
project financing through affiliated entities.

Quill 115 LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr.  M.D. Fla. Case No. 25-05997) on August 22, 2025. In
its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities
between $10 million and $50 million each.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Roberta A. Colton handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Matthew B. Hale, Esq. at STICHTER,
RIEDEL, BLAIN & POSTLER, P.A.


RECONNECT INC: Section 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on September 24
------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 21, 2025, Reconnect Incorporated filed Chapter 11
protection in the District of New Jersey. According to court
filing, the Debtor reports between $1 million and $10 million in
debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be
available to unsecured creditors.

A meeting of creditors under Section 341(a) to be held on September
24, 2025 at 10:00 AM at Telephonic.

         About Reconnect Incorporated

Reconnect Incorporated, doing business as Highkickz, operates as an
online retailer specializing in footwear, accessories, and apparel
for men, women, and children, offering products from major brands
including Nike, Adidas, Puma, and Timberland. The Company provides
a broad range of casual and athletic styles and emphasizes customer
service with free ground shipping, monthly promotions, and active
engagement through social media.

Reconnect Incorporated sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 25-18785) on August 21,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets up to
$50,000 and estimated liabilities between $1 million and $10
million.

The Debtor is represented by Melinda Middlebrooks, Esq. at
MIDDLEBROOKS SHAPIRO, P.C.


RECONNECT INCORPORATED: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
----------------------------------------------------
Reconnect Incorporated asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey for authority to use cash collateral and
provide adequate protection.

The Debtor operates as an e-commerce retailer of footwear, apparel,
and accessories under the brand "HighKickz" through its website and
third-party platforms like Amazon, Walmart, and eBay. The business
is owned and managed by its sole shareholder and COO, Thomas H.
Koo, and employs one other individual to manage inventory, which
currently includes approximately 585 units with a liquidation value
of $42,000. Operating from leased premises in New Jersey (with
Mejor Angora LLC as landlord), the Debtor is current on lease
payments and intends to assume the lease.

The Debtor's financial performance has declined due to inflation,
increased operating costs, import tariffs, and weakening consumer
spending. Gross profits dropped from $862,518 in 2023 to $376,289
in 2024, despite efforts to reduce costs and diversify offerings.
To manage cash flow, the Debtor took out various merchant cash
advances and revenue-based financing agreements, including
contracts with Parafin, Flexibility Capital, DMKA LLC, and Parkside
Funding Group. These short-term financial arrangements eventually
overwhelmed the business, despite efforts to restructure or settle
the debts, including hiring a commercial debt consolidation firm
(Rise Alliance) and entering into settlement agreements with
creditors like DMKA and Parkside. Litigation followed, including
lawsuits filed by Bluevine, Inc. in Utah and Parkside in New York
against both the Debtor and Thomas Koo, who personally guaranteed
nearly all business debts.

Facing aggressive collection actions, threatened levies, and
potential account freezes, the Debtor filed for Chapter 11 on
August 21 to protect its operations and reorganize. No trustee,
examiner, or creditors' committee has been appointed, and the
Debtor continues to operate as debtor-in-possession under 11 U.S.C.
sections 1107(a) and 1108.

The Debtor seeks authority to use alleged cash collateral belonging
to secured creditors (including the U.S. Small Business
Administration, DMKA LLC, Parkside Funding, and Flexibility
Capital) to maintain ordinary operations and preserve going-concern
value. These creditors have UCC-1 filings on the Debtor's accounts,
giving them claims to cash collateral under section 363(a). The
Debtor submitted a four-month Interim Monthly Budget projecting
gross revenues of $335,000, total expenses of $225,567, and net
disposable income of $6,802 per month.

The Debtor argues that the secured creditors are adequately
protected due to their additional collateral (e.g., personal
guarantees from Thomas Koo), and that an equity cushion exists in
the form of the Debtor's future income.

As further adequate protection, the Debtor offers replacement liens
on post-petition collateral, equal in extent and priority to
pre-petition liens, to the extent cash collateral is used. Without
immediate access to cash collateral, the Debtor would be unable to
pay employees, purchase inventory, or cover operating
costs—effectively forcing shutdown and destroying reorganization
potential.

A court hearing is scheduled for August 28.

                   About Reconnect Incorporated

Reconnect Incorporated operates as an e-commerce retailer of
footwear, apparel, and accessories under the brand "HighKickz"
through its website and third-party platforms like Amazon, Walmart,
and eBay.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No. 25-18785) on August 21,
2025. In the petition signed by Thomas Koo, president, the Debtor
disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $10 million in
liabilities.

Melinda Middlebrooks, Esq., at Middlebrooks Shapiro, P.C.,
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


RHODE ISLAND MAYORAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg, Affirms 'BB+' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook to negative from stable and
affirmed its 'BB+' issuer credit rating (ICR) on Rhode Island
Mayoral Academy Blackstone Valley (Blackstone Valley Prep, or
BVP).

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our view of BVP's weakened
days' cash on hand metrics and thin lease-adjusted maximum annual
debt service (MADS) coverage, as well as our view of the
unpredictable funding landscape, which has recently pressured
operations. We expect pro-forma MADS to increase with the addition
of obligations in fiscal 2025. While management expects to remain
in compliance with its debt covenants in the near term, operating
projections are slim and could indicate thin coverage, in our
view.

“We have analyzed the school's environmental, social, and
governance factors and consider them neutral in our credit rating
analysis.

"The negative outlook reflects the one-in-three chance we could
lower the rating within the outlook period if operating targets are
not met, such that pro-forma lease-adjusted MADS coverage does not
improve to anticipated levels, or such that liquidity metrics fail
to stabilize at levels commensurate with the current rating. We
could also lower the rating if the school continues to use lines of
credit to bridge funding gaps and meet covenants, though this is
not expected for fiscal 2025, per management.

"We could lower the rating if the school continues to produce
operating deficits, such that pro-forma lease-adjusted MADS
coverage does not improve from current levels. We could also take
negative rating action if liquidity significantly weakens from
current levels. While this is not expected, we could also view
sustained enrollment declines negatively.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if the school returns to
generating stable-to-positive operating results such that its
liquidity position improves to closer to recent levels without the
use of letters of credit, and if its debt profile moderates."



RITE AID: Co., Lease Buyer Slam Sale Objection of Landlord
----------------------------------------------------------
Emily Lever of Law360 reports that bankrupt drugstore chain Rite
Aid and retailer Ross Dress for Less are opposing a landlord's
challenge to the proposed sale of 18 Rite Aid store leases to Ross,
arguing the transaction serves Rite Aid’s best interests.

                    About Rite Aid

Rite Aid is a full-service pharmacy committed to improving health
outcomes. Rite Aid is defining the modern pharmacy by meeting
customer needs with a wide range of solutions that offer
convenience, including retail and delivery pharmacy, as well as
services offered through the Company's wholly owned subsidiary
Bartell Drugs. On the Web: http://www.riteaid.com/   

Rite Aid and certain of its subsidiaries previously filed for
chapter 11 bankruptcy in October 2023 and emerged from bankruptcy
in August 2024.

On May 5, 2025, New Rite Aid, LLC and its subsidiaries, including
Rite Aid Corporation, commenced voluntary Chapter 11 proceedings
(Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No. 25-14861). As of the 2025 bankruptcy
filing date, Rite Aid operates 1,277 stores and 3 distribution
centers in 15 states and employs approximately 24,500 people. Rite
Aid is using the Chapter 11 process to pursue a sale of its
prescriptions, pharmacy and front-end inventory, and other assets.
The cases are being administered by the Honorable Michael B.
Kaplan.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is serving as legal
advisor, Guggenheim Securities, LLC is serving as investment
banker, and Alvarez & Marsal is serving as financial advisor to the
Company. Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher is serving as
strategic communications advisor to the Company.

Kroll is the claims agent and maintains the page
https://restructuring.ra.kroll.com/RiteAid2025

Bank of America, N.A., as DIP Agent, is represented by lawyers at
Greenberg Traurig, LLP; and Choate Hall & Stewart LLP.


RS BORGES INVESTMENTS: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida
---------------------------------------------------------------
On August 25, 2025, RS Borges Investments LLC filed Chapter 11
protection in the Middle District of Florida. According to court
filing, the Debtor reports  between $500,000 and $1 million in
debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be
available to unsecured creditors.

         About RS Borges Investments LLC

RS Borges Investments LLC, doing business as Lisbon Portuguese
Restaurant,

RS Borges Investments LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
25-05366) on August 25, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports
estimated assets up to $50,000 and estimated liabilities between
$500,000 and $1 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Lori V. Vaughan handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by J. Andrew Braithwaite, PA.


SABRE INDUSTRIES: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating on
Electric transmission and distribution structures producer Sabre
Industries Inc.

S&P also revised its recovery rating on the proposed $1.33 billion
term loan to '4' recovery rating from '3' and affirmed its 'B'
issue-level rating.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation for net leverage of
4x-5x over the next 12 months.

Sabre issued an incremental $70 million to its recent first-lien
term loan issuance, with the majority of the additional funds
intended to fund an additional dividend to Blackstone Capital
Partners.

S&P said, "Although we believe the transaction will moderately
increase its leverage, we expect the company will maintain S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of about 5x through most market
conditions.

"We reduced our assessment of the recovery rating on the first-lien
term loan based on our updated recovery analysis. The $70 million
incremental dividend capitalization increases the debt obligation
without enhancing earnings. As a result, our recovery estimate is
slightly weaker. Given the recovery prospects remain within the
average range, we affirmed the 'B' issue rating.

"We expect leverage will remain about 5x while Sabre maintains
financial flexibility and a cushion against weaker market
conditions. While the addition of debt to fund the dividend payment
increases leverage to 5.0x from 4.0x as of fiscal-yearend 2025, we
expect revenue growth and stable margins will be sufficient to
support liquidity and continued access to capital markets. Further,
we expect the company will maintain EBITDA interest coverage of
about 2.7x while generating positive free cash flow. As such, the
company has a significant cushion against potential earnings
decline.

"The stable outlook on Sabre reflects our expectation that the
company will maintain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of
nearly 5x and EBITDA interest coverage of at least 2x over the next
12 months. We expect the company to maintain these credit measures
even as macroeconomic and operating conditions remain difficult."

S&P could lower its ratings on Sabre within the next year if:

-- S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA declines more than 25% such
that S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage rises above 7x and EBITDA
interest coverage declines toward 1.5x with little prospect of
rapid recovery; or

-- Management undertakes a more aggressive financial policy,
including pursuing large, debt-financed acquisitions or shareholder
returns, which weaken credit measures.

Although highly unlikely given the company's ownership by a
private-equity firm, S&P would upgrade Sabre if:

-- S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA improves to well
below 5x and S&P believes it can sustain those levels through most
market conditions; and

-- The financial sponsor demonstrates commitment to this level for
multiple years.



SAMYS OC: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to Sept. 30
----------------------------------------------------------
Samys OC, LLC received sixth interim approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas to use cash collateral
through September 30.

The sixth interim order authorized the Debtor to use cash
collateral to pay operating expenses set forth in its budget, with
a variance of 10%.

As adequate protection for the Debtor's use of their cash
collateral, secured creditors Dream First Bank and the U.S. Small
Business Administration were granted replacement liens on all
post-petition cash collateral and other property of the Debtor, to
the same extent and with the same priority as their pre-bankruptcy
liens.

As additional protection, Dream First Bank will continue to receive
a monthly payment of $59,913.90.

The interim order provides for a carveout of up to $125,000 for
attorney fees and expenses, and up to $25,000 for other
professional fees and disbursements.

A final hearing is scheduled for September 24.

                        About Samys OC LLC

Samys OC, LLC filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kansas Case No. 24-11166) on
Nov. 14, 2024, listing up to $50,000 in assets and $10 million to
$50 million in liabilities. The petition was signed by Amro M. Samy
as managing member.

Judge Mitchell L Herren presides over the case.

Lora J. Smith, Esq., at Hinkle Law Firm is the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

Dream First Bank, as secured creditor, is represented by:

   Scott M. Hill, Esq.
   Hite, Fanning & Honeyman, LLP
   100 N. Broadway, Ste. 950
   Wichita, KS 67202-2216
   Telephone: (316) 265-7741
   Facsimile: (316) 267-7803
   hill@hitefanning.com


SBHC HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CC' on Planned Debt Exchange
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on SBHC
Holdings LLC (dba Summit Behavioral Health) to 'CC' from 'B-' and
its issue-level rating on the company's first-lien term loan to
'CC' from 'B-'.

S&P said, "Our issue-level rating on the company's first-lien
revolver remains unchanged, reflecting the proposed repayment and
exchange into a new SSFO revolver.

"The negative outlook indicates that we will lower our issuer
credit rating to 'SD' (selective default) upon closing and funding
of the transaction. We would also lower our issue-level rating on
the first-lien term loan to 'SD' at that time."

On August 14, 2025, Summit announced a debt refinancing transaction
that includes an exchange offer and consent solicitation with
respect to its first-lien revolver and first-lien term loan.

The transaction also includes an opportunity for term loan lenders
to participate in a new, $125 million super-senior first-out (SSFO)
term loan.

Upon closing, S&P will view the transaction as distressed and
tantamount to a default due to term loan lenders receiving less
value than originally promised and the realistic possibility of a
conventional default over the near to medium term if the
transaction does not close.

The downgrade follows Summit's announcement of a transaction that
S&P views as a distressed exchange. The transaction, which has 100%
participation of revolver lenders and term loan lenders, includes a
full repayment and exchange of the company's $177 million
first-lien revolver due November 2026 into a new $177 million SSFO
revolver due October 2029, and an exchange at par of the company's
$790 million first-lien term loan into a new, $790 million super
senior second-out term (SSSO) loan due December 2029. If Summit has
liquidity in excess of $10 on December 31, 2027, then the SSFO
revolver shall automatically extend to July 2030 and the SSSO term
loan shall automatically extend to October 2030.

All first-lien term loan lenders are also offered an opportunity to
participate in a new $125 million SSFO term loan due December 2029
(with the same automatic extension details as the SSSO term loan),
the proceeds of which it will use to repay the outstanding balance
on the revolver. The SSFO term loan includes a 2% original issue
discount and an additional 3.5% payment-in-kind backstop fee for
the benefit of an ad-hoc group of lenders.

S&P said, "After closing, we will view the transaction as
distressed and tantamount to a default due to term loan lenders
receiving less value than originally promised. Specifically, we
believe term loan lenders will not receive adequate compensation to
offset the maturity extension and the SSSO term loan's junior
ranking to the SSFO revolver and SSFO term loan. We also believe
the rates are below what the company would be required to pay for
new capital under current market conditions. Finally, we believe
there is a risk for a conventional default if the transaction does
not close given the company's recent operational challenges,
constrained liquidity position, and existing revolver maturity in
November 2026.

"If the transaction is closed and funded per the terms and timing
outlined, then we would lower our issuer credit rating on Summit
and issue-level ratings on the first-lien term loan to 'SD'. Our
rating on the repaid revolver will also be withdrawn. Subsequently,
we plan to raise our issuer-level rating on Summit and assign
issue-level ratings to its new debt based on a review of its
capital structure and our expectations for the company.

"The negative outlook indicates that we will lower our issuer
credit rating to 'SD' upon closing and funding of the transaction.
We would also lower our issue-level rating on the first-lien term
loan to 'SD' at that time."



SCIENTIFIC ENERGY: Needs More Time to Finalize Q2 10-Q Statements
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Scientific Energy, Inc. filed a Notification of Late Filing on Form
12b-25 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, informing
that it is unable to file, without unreasonable effort or expense,
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2025 within the prescribed time period because additional time is
required to finalize its financial statements and related
disclosures required to be included in the 10-Q. The Company
expects to file the 10-Q within five calendar days following the
prescribed due date.

                     About Scientific Energy

Scientific Energy, Inc. is a mobile platform of ordering and
delivery services for restaurants or other merchants in Macau. The
Company's businesses are built on its platform, Aomi App. The
Platform connects restaurants/merchants with consumers and Delivery
riders. The Platform is created to serve the needs of these three
key areas and to become more intelligent and efficient with every
customer order.

Hong Kong-based Centurion AOGB CPA Limited, the Company's auditor
since 2025, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated May 23, 2025, attached to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and had a
working capital deficit that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.

As of December 31, 2024, the Company has $55,551,046 in total
assets against $24,344,657 in total liabilities.



SERENITY TENDER: Section 341(a) Meeting of Creditors on Sept. 23
----------------------------------------------------------------
Serenity Tender Care Services LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection on August 1, 2025, in the District of Arizona. The
filing reports $1,288,365 in debt owed to between 1 and 49
creditors and states that funds will be available for distribution
to unsecured creditors.

A meeting of creditors under Section 341(a) to be held on September
23, 2025 at 09:45 AM as a Telephonic meeting.

               About Serenity Tender Care Services LLC

Serenity Tender Care Services LLC, established in April 2017,
provides care and social services for individuals with
developmental disabilities, focusing on improving quality of life
and teaching coping skills, operating primarily in Maricopa County,
Arizona, with licensure to serve the entire state.

The company sought Chapter 11 relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 25-07941) on August 1, 2025. In its
petition, the Debtor reports total assets of $772,367 and total
liabilities of $1,288,365.

The Debtor represented by M. Preston Gardner, Esq. at DAVIS MILES
MCGUIRE GARDNER, PLLC.


SIFAT LLC: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity to December 1
---------------------------------------------------------
Sifat LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District
of California to extend its exclusivity periods to file a plan of
reorganization and obtain acceptance thereof to December 1, 2025
and January 30, 2026, respectively.

The Debtor explains that this is a complex case, involving valuable
real property which the Debtor believes to be worth substantially
more than the debts against such real property. At this time, there
is a major case contingency pending that will impact the ultimate
disposition of this case, involving the Debtor's pending efforts to
reach a reinstatement agreement with Standard. The Debtor submits
that this case contingency warrants a brief extension of the
Debtor's plan exclusivity periods.

The Debtor claims that it is requesting an extension in good faith
for the purpose of designating an appropriate exit strategy once an
accurate purview of these cases as a whole is established in light
of pending discussions with Standard.

The Debtor asserts that this is its first request to extend any of
its plan exclusivity periods under Section 1121 of the Bankruptcy
Code and the requested extension is within the limits set forth in
Section 1121(d)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. Courts commonly grant
multiple extensions of the exclusivity periods. Therefore, this
factor weighs in favor of extending the Debtor's plan exclusivity
periods.

The Debtor further asserts that its request herein is being made in
good faith and not for the purpose of pressuring creditors into
acceding to certain plan terms. To the contrary, the Debtor is
seeking to reach agreement with Standard regarding the terms of
reinstatement of the Loan in order to resolve and ultimately
dismiss this case.

Sifat LLC is represented by:

     Krikor J. Meshefejian, Esq.
     Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Golubchik LLP
     2818 La Cienega Avenue
     Los Angeles, CA 90034
     Telephone: (310) 229-1234
     Facsimile: (310) 229-1244
     Email: kjm@lnbyg.com  
     
                         About Sifat LLC

Sifat LLC owns and manages a single commercial real estate asset,
an office building located at 2115 Winnie Street in Galveston,
Texas. The Company operates from Newport Beach, California, and is
affiliated with the Cantour Group, which oversees property
development and leasing activities for the building.

Sifat LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 25-11513) on June 2, 2025. In its
petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and liabilities
between $10 million and $50 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Mark D. Houle handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by David B. Golubchik, Esq., at Levene,
Neale, Bender, Yoo & Golubchik LLP.


SK INDUSTRIES: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended to October 16
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jerry C. Oldshue, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Florida extended SK Industries, LLC, d/b/a
Pensacola Athletic Center's exclusive periods to file a plan of
reorganization and obtain acceptance thereof to October 16 and
December 12, 2025, respectively.

As shared by Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor submits that
cause exists for the extension requested in the instant Motion.
More specifically:

     * This case involves potentially a few complex legal issues;

     * The Debtor is generally paying post-petition debts as they
come due;

     * The Debtor is in compliance with all of the operating
guidelines of the United States Trustee;

     * The Debtor has made substantial progress in negotiating with
creditors;

     * The Debtor seeks this extension of exclusivity in good
faith, and not for the purpose of pressuring or otherwise
attempting to prejudice the rights of any creditors;

     * The resolution of plan treatment for Regions Bank is
necessary to drafting a viable Chapter 11 Plan.

     * The Debtor submits that no creditor or party in interest
will be prejudiced by granting the relief requested herein.

SK Industries, LLC is represented by:

     Byron Wright, III, Esq.
     Bruner Wright, P.A.
     2868 Remington Green Circle, Suite B
     Tallahassee, FL 32308
     Telephone: (850) 385-0342
     Facsimile: (850) 270-2441

                       About SK Industries LLC

SK Industries, LLC, doing business as Pensacola Athletic Center, is
a comprehensive fitness facility offering 24-hour gym access,
personal training, childcare services, tennis courts, swimming
pools, and group fitness classes. The family-owned business has
been serving the Pensacola community since 1985, with a focus on
health and wellness for individuals of all ages.

SK Industries filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case
No. 25-30138) on Feb. 18, 2025, listing between $1 million and $10
million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Jerry C. Oldshue, Jr. oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by Byron W. Wright III, Esq., at Bruner
Wright, P.A.


SMITH ENVIRONMENTAL: Gets Court OK to Tap Messari as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Smith Environmental and Engineering, Inc. received approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to employ
Messari Group Ltd. as its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in preparing its monthly operating
reports, preparing its tax returns and tax-related documents and
schedules, and providing general accounting and bookkeeping
services to the Debtor.

The firm will be paid at the rate of $300 per hour.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mr. Polk disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Gina M. Polk
     Messari Group Ltd
     1180 Village Ridge Point
     Monument, CO 80132
     Telephone: (719) 425-8322
     Email: gina.polk@messarigroup.com

          About Smith Environmental and Engineering, Inc.

Smith Environmental and Engineering, Inc. is a woman-owned
consulting firm that provides comprehensive environmental services,
specializing in ecological sciences, environmental engineering, and
construction. With over 24 years of experience, the company offers
tailored solutions for environmental management, hazardous
materials, and cultural resource projects across various
industries.

Smith Environmental and Engineering sought relief under Subchapter
V of Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case
No. 25-11042) on February 28, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor
reported total assets of $1,486,401 and total liabilities of
$2,975,603.

Judge Michael E. Romero handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by David Warner, Esq.


SPIRIT AIRLINES: Works w/ Advisers to Explore 2nd Chap. 11 Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Alison Sider and Alexander Gladstone of The Wall Street Journal
report that Spirit Airlines is weighing strategic options after its
recent restructuring failed to place the budget carrier on stable
financial footing, according to people familiar with the matter.

The airline has hired PJT Partners as its financial adviser while
contending with a cash crunch that it has warned threatens its
ability to continue operating. Spirit is also working with
consultants FTI and Seabury Airline Strategy Group.

                  About Spirit Airlines

Spirit Airlines, Inc. (SAVE) is a low-fare carrier committed to
delivering the best value in the sky by offering an enhanced travel
experience with flexible, affordable options. Spirit serves
destinations throughout the United States, Latin America and the
Caribbean with its Fit Fleet, one of the youngest and most
fuel-efficient fleets in the U.S. On the Web:
http://wwww.spirit.com/               

Spirit Airlines and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 24-11988) on Nov. 18, 2024, after
reaching terms of a pre-arranged plan with bondholders.

At the time of the filing, Spirit Airlines reported $1 billion to
$10 billion
in both assets and liabilities. Judge Sean H. Lane oversees the
case.

The Debtors tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell, LLP as legal counsel;
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as financial advisor; and
Perella Weinberg Partners LP as investment banker. Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC, is the claims agent.

Paul Hastings, LLP and Ducera Partners, LLC serve as legal counsel
for the Ad Hoc Group of Convertible Noteholders.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP and Evercore Group LLC
represent the Ad Hoc Group of Senior Secured Noteholders.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Willkie Farr
& Gallagher LLP as counsel.

Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., is serving as financial advisor and
Latham & Watkins LLP is serving as legal counsel to Frontier.


ST VINCENT HOME: Case Summary & Three Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: St Vincent Home Healthcare Agency LLC
        285 Woodstream Way
        Spring Hill, FL 34608

Business Description: St. Vincent Home Health Care Agency LLC
                      provides home health care services,
                      including nursing and personal support, to
                      individuals in Florida.  Its operations
                      focus on delivering in-home medical and
                      supportive care to patients requiring
                      assistance outside of hospital settings.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 25, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 25-02920

Judge: Hon. Jason A Burgess

Debtor's Counsel: Richard A. Perry, Esq.
                  RICHARD A. PERRY P.A.
                  820 East Fort King Street
                  Ocala, FL 34471-2320
                  Tel: 352-732-2299
                  Email: richard@rapocala.com

Total Assets: $1,024,114

Total Liabilities: $702,961

Jordan Armstrong signed the petition in his capacity as CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's three unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/3E4GFNQ/St_Vincent_Home_Healthcare_Agency__flmbke-25-02920__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


STORMS FAMILY: Hires Sue D. Lasky PA as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Storms Family Land Trust seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to hire Sue D. Lasky, PA
to serve as its legal counsel.

Ms. Lasky will provide these services:

   (a) represent the Debtor in its Chapter 11 proceedings;

   (b) provide the Debtor with legal advice with respect to its
powers and duties in these proceedings;

   (c) prepare on behalf of the Debtor the necessary applications,
orders, reports, and other legal papers; and

   (d) perform all other legal services for the Debtor that may be
necessary herein.

Ms. Lasky will be retained on a general retainer pursuant to 11
U.S.C. Sections 327 and 330, retroactive to June 4, 2025. No
payment of fees will be made from the bankruptcy estate until such
time as fees are awarded by the bankruptcy court upon application
and notice.

According to court filings, Susan D. Lasky, Esq. holds no interest
adverse to the estate and is a "disinterested person" as required
by Bankruptcy Rule 2014 and 11 U.S.C. Section 327(a).

The firm can be reached at:

   Susan D. Lasky, Esq.
   Sue D. Lasky, PA
   320 SE 18 Street
   Ft Laud., FL 33316
   Telephone: (954) 400-7474
   E-mail: Sue@SueLasky.com

                   About The Storms Family Land Trust

The Storms Family Land Trust is a land trust that holds a single
real estate asset located at 3325 NE 14 Court in Fort Lauderdale,
Florida. The property is valued at approximately $2.49 million.

The Storms Family Land Trust sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 25-16373) on June
4, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reported total assets of
$2,489,590 and total liabilities of $3,279,886.

Judge Peter D. Russin handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Susan D. Lasky, Esq., at Susan D.
Lasky, PA.


SUNNY ENERGY: Trustee Taps ERC to Assist in Retention Credits
-------------------------------------------------------------
James E. Cross, the Subchapter V Trustee and Disbursing Agent of
Sunny Energy, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Arizona to employ ERC Specialists, LLC to
assist in obtaining remaining employee retention credits for the
Debtor's estate.

ERC Specialists, LLC will provide these services:

   (a) perform services related to Employee Retention Credit
submission processing;

   (b) help obtain the maximum credits from the Internal Revenue
Service;

   (c) assist with the pending ERC application in the amount of
$400,000; and

   (d) continue efforts to obtain ERC credits owed to the Debtor on
behalf of the estate.

ERC Specialists has agreed to assist the Trustee on a contingency
basis of 15% of all net ERC recoveries obtained from the IRS.

ERC Specialists, LLC is a "disinterested person" within the meaning
of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached at:

   ERC Specialists, LLC
   560 E. Timpanogos Circle
   Orem, UT 84097
   Telephone: (385) 707-0170

                      About Sunny Energy

Sunny Energy LLC is a solar energy equipment supplier in Tempe,
Arizona.

Sunny Energy LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 24-06111) on July 26,
2024. In the petition filed by Joseph J. Cunningham, manager, the
Debtor reports total assets of $1,838,684 and total liabilities of
$2,115,170 as of April 30, 2024.

The Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Brenda K. Martin oversees the case.

Engelman Berger PC serves as the Debtor's counsel.

James E. Cross was appointed as trustee in this Chapter 11 case.
The trustee tapped Cross Law Firm, PLC as counsel and David Herman,
CPA, as tax preparer.


TARGET GROUP: Posts $220K Net Loss, Lower Revenue in Fiscal Q2
--------------------------------------------------------------
Target Group Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $219,770 for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to a
net income of $666,664 for the three months ended June 30, 2024.

Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $1,245,724
compared to a revenue of $2,275,011 for the same period in 2024.

For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a net
loss of $327,983, compared to a net income of $473,496 for the same
period in 2024.

Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $2,646,163
compared to a revenue of $4,194,942 for the same period in 2024.

During the six months ended June 30, 2025, the company has
generated revenue but has also incurred operating losses for the
six months ended June 30, 2025. The Company had a working capital
deficit of $10,357,203 and an accumulated deficit of $31,274,827 as
of June 30, 2025. The Company's continuation as a going concern is
dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from
operations to meet its obligations and/or obtaining additional
financing from its members or other sources, as may be required.

The unaudited accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial
statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will
continue as a going concern up to at least 12 months from the
balance sheet date; however, such conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to do so.

To maintain its current level of operations, the Company will
require additional working capital from either cash flow from
operations, sale of its equity or issuance of debt. If the Company
is unable to acquire additional working capital, it will be
required to significantly reduce its current level of operations.

A full-text copy of the Company's Form 10-Q is available at:

                  https://tinyurl.com/5n6rrzr9

                        About Target Group

Headquartered in Ontario, Canada, Target Group Inc. is engaged in
the cultivation, processing, and distribution of curated cannabis
products for the medical and adult-use recreational cannabis market
in Canada and, where legalized by state legislation, in the United
States. The Company is positioning itself with a core emphasis on
wholesale and co-packaging services to accommodate all
consumer-packaged goods intended for the sophisticated cannabis
market and consumer in Canada and internationally. This strategy
integrates cannabinoid research, analytical testing, product
development, and manufacturing.

Spokane, Washington-based Fruci & Associates II, PLLC, the
Company's auditor since 2017, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated Mar. 27, 2025, citing that the
Company has an accumulated deficit and a working capital deficit.
These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. As of Dec. 31,
2024, the Company had a working capital deficit of $9,994,548 and
an accumulated deficit of $30,946,844.

As of December 31, 2024, the Company had $7,573,533 in total
assets, $14,081,162 in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $6,507,629. As of June 30, 2025, the Company had
$6,590,715 in total assets, $13,621,173 in total liabilities, and
$7,030,458 in total stockholders' deficiency.


THERAPEUTICS MD: Swings to $551,000 Profit in Fiscal Q2
-------------------------------------------------------
TherapeuticsMD Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net income
of $551 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared
to a net loss of $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30,
2024.

Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $952 thousand
compared to a revenue of $234 thousand for the same period in
2024.

For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company reported a net
loss of $102 thousand, compared to a net loss of $1.8 million for
the same period in 2024.

Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $1.3 million,
compared to a revenue of $547 thousand for the same period in
2024.

As of June 30, 2025, the Company's cash and cash equivalents
totaled $6.1 million.

The Company continues to evaluate a variety of strategic
alternatives that may include, but not be limited to, an
acquisition, merger, other business combination, sale of assets, or
other strategic transactions involving the Company. Although the
Company is exploring potential strategic alternatives, there can be
no assurance of a transaction, a successful outcome of these
efforts, or the form or timing of any such outcome. The Company has
not set a timetable for completion of this exploration process and
does not intend to disclose further developments unless and until
it is determined that disclosure is appropriate or necessary.

A full-text copy of the Company's Form 10-Q is available at:

                  https://tinyurl.com/2w6yk6es

                     About TherapeuticsMD Inc.

TherapeuticsMD Inc. was previously a women's healthcare company
with a mission of creating and commercializing innovative products
to support the lifespan of women from pregnancy prevention through
menopause. In December 2022, the Company changed its business to
become a pharmaceutical royalty company, primarily collecting
royalties from its licensees. The Company is no longer engaging in
research and development or commercial operations.

West Palm Beach, Fla.-based Berkowitz Pollack Brant, Advisors +
CPAs, the Company's auditor since 2023, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated Mar. 27, 2025, attached to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31,
2024, citing that the Company's recent change in operations and
negative cash flow position along with other conditions, raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

As of Jun. 30, 2025, the Company had $38.5 million in total assets,
against $12.2 million in total liabilities.


TINY FROG: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------
Tiny Frog, Inc. received final approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Raleigh Division,
to use cash collateral.

The final order authorized the Debtor for its post-petition
operating expenses in accordance with the budget. Any expenditure
exceeding 10% of a budgeted line item requires court approval or
prior written consent from secured creditors.

The secured creditors are First Federal Bank, The Bancorp Bank/SBA,
Business Expansion Funding, Timepayment Corp, IDEA 247, Inc. and
the Department of Treasury. These creditors assert $1,710,271.33 in
claims.

As adequate protection, secured creditors' liens extend to
post-petition assets to the extent valid pre-petition liens exist.
The Debtor must make monthly contract payments to The Bancorp
Bank.

The Debtor's authority to use cash collateral terminates upon the
occurrence of so-called events of default, including failure to
comply with the terms of the order; use of cash collateral other
than as agreed; dismissal or conversion of its Chapter 11 case to a
proceeding under Chapter 7; and failure to pay post-petition tax
liabilities.

The Debtor projects total operational expenses of $455,702.00.

                  About Tiny Frog, Inc.

Tiny Frog, Inc. operates multiple franchise locations of Hwy 55
Burger Shakes & Fries, a fast-casual dining chain specializing in
burgers, shakes, and fries, under franchise agreements with The
Little Mint, Inc.

Tiny Frog filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Case No.
25-01081) on March 25, 2025, listing up to $50,000 in assets and up
to $10 million in liabilities. Alexis Ramos, president of Tiny
Frog, signed the petition.

Judge Joseph N. Callaway oversees the case.

David F. Mills, Esq., at Narron Wenzel, P.A., represents the Debtor
as legal counsel.


TITAN CNG: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Delaware
--------------------------------------------------
On August 14, 2025, Titan CNG LLC filed Chapter 11 protection in
the District of Delaware. According to court filing, the Debtor
reports between $10 million and $50 million in debt owed to 1 and
49 creditors. The petition states funds will be available to
unsecured creditors.

         About Titan CNG LLC

Titan CNG LLC is an Arizona-based company specializing in
compressed natural gas (CNG) equipment leasing and services.

Titan CNG LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. District of Delaware) on August 14, 2025. In
its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets between $100,000
and $500,000 and estimated liabilities between $10 million and $50
million.

The Debtor is represented by Natasha M. Songonuga, Esq. at Archer &
Greiner, P.C.


TROYZ TOWING: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida
------------------------------------------------------
On August 23, 2025, Troyz Towing & Storage Inc. filed Chapter 11
protection in the Middle District of Florida. According to court
filing, the Debtor reports $2,043,872 in debt owed to 1 and 49
creditors. The petition states funds will be available to unsecured
creditors.

         About Troyz Towing & Storage Inc.

Troyz Towing & Storage Inc., based in Jacksonville, Florida,
provides towing, roadside assistance, and vehicle storage services.
The Company operates 24/7 and offers light, medium, and heavy-duty
towing, flatbed transport, diesel truck repair, and related
automotive support. It serves the Jacksonville area through its
main facility on Old Kings Road.

Troyz Towing & Storage Inc. sought relief under Subchapter V of
Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
25-02906) on August 23, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports
total assets of $2,125,617 and total liabilities of $2,043,87.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Jason A. Burgess handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Rehan N. Khawaja, Esq. at NASSAU
BANKRUPTCY LAWYERS, P.A.


UPHEALTH HOLDINGS: Reaches Chapter 11 Agreement With Glocal
-----------------------------------------------------------
Yun Park of Law360 reports that bankrupt medical technology firm
UpHealth informed a Delaware bankruptcy court that it has settled
Indian company Glocal Healthcare's $200 million adversary suit,
ending a contentious dispute over a failed merger.
                 About UpHealth Holdings

UpHealth Holdings Inc. is a global digital health company
delivering technology platforms, infrastructure, and services to
modernize care delivery and health management.

UpHealth Holdings and its affiliates sought relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 23-11476) on
Sept. 19, 2023. In the petitions filed by Samuel J. Meckey, chief
executive officer, UpHealth Holdings disclosed up to $500 million
in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Stuart M. Brown, Esq., at DLA Piper LLP (US) as
counsel; Morrison & Foerster LLP as litigation counsel; and FTI
Consulting, Inc. as financial advisor. Omni Agent Solutions is the
Debtors' claims agent and administrative agent.


VIEWBIX INC: MMCAP International and MM Asset Holds 1.75% Stake
---------------------------------------------------------------
MMCAP International Inc. SPC and MM Asset Management Inc. disclosed
in a Schedule 13G (Amendment No. 4) filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission that as of June 30, 2025, they beneficially
own 115,995 shares of Viewbix Inc.'s Common Stock ($0.0001 par
value per share). The reporting persons have shared voting power
and shared dispositive power over all these shares, representing
1.75% of the class.

The reporting persons may be reached through:

     MMCAP International Inc. SPC
     c/o Mourant Governance Services (Cayman) Limited
     94 Solaris Avenue, Camana Bay
     P.O. Box 1348
     Grand Cayman, KY1-1108, Cayman Islands
     Tel: 416-408-0997

     MM Asset Management Inc.
     161 Bay Street
     TD Canada Trust Tower, Suite 2240
     Toronto, ON M5J 2S1
     Canada

A full-text copy of MMCAP's SEC Report is available at
https://tinyurl.com/4vnjdh6r

                          About Viewbix

Headquartered in Ramat Gan, Israel, Viewbix and its subsidiaries,
Gix Media and Cortex Media Group Ltd., operate in the field of
digital advertising. The Group has two main activities that are
reported as separate operating segments: the search segment and the
digital content segment. The search segment develops a variety of
technological software solutions, which perform automation,
optimization, and monetization of internet campaigns, for the
purposes of obtaining and routing internet user traffic to its
customers. The search segment activity is conducted by Gix Media.
The digital content segment is engaged in the creation and editing
of content, in different languages, for different target audiences,
for the purposes of generating revenues from leading advertising
platforms, including Google, Facebook, Yahoo and Apple, by
utilizing such content to obtain and route internet user traffic
for its customers. The digital content segment activity is
conducted by Cortex.

Tel Aviv, Israel-based Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co., the Company's
auditor since 2012, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated March 21, 2025, citing that the decrease in revenues
and cash flows from operations may result in the Company's
inability to repay its debt obligations during the 12-month period
following the issuance date of these financial statements. These
conditions raise a substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

As of Jun. 30, 2025, Viewbix had $22.1 million in total assets
against $14.8 million in total liabilities.


VOYAGE ACADEMY: Moody's Assigns Ba1 Rating to 2025A/B Revenue Bonds
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has assigned an initial Ba1 underlying rating to
Voyage Academy, UT's proposed Charter School Revenue Refunding
Bonds (Voyage Academy Project) Series 2025A and Charter School
Revenue Refunding Bonds (Voyage Academy Project) Series 2025B
(Federally Taxable) with estimated par amounts of $16.8 million and
$125,000, respectively. The Utah Charter School Finance Authority
will issue the bonds on behalf of the charter school academy. The
outlook is stable. Following issuance, these bonds will constitute
all of the academy's outstanding debt.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba1 reflects Voyage Academy's solid market position as an
alternative provider of K-6th grade education in Davis County, UT.
The academy has consistently achieved full enrollment and
demonstrates adequate waitlist demand, driven by its competitive
academic performance. The academy will use a portion of the
proceeds of the proposed issue to expand its facilities across all
grade levels. It has also recently received authorization to
increase its enrollment capacity by 100 students, bringing the
maximum to 625. The academy's competitive profile puts it in an
adequate position to achieve enrollment targets required for
generating the revenue needed to support the increasing annual debt
service. The academy has a track record of steady operating
margins, robust cash reserves, and reliable annual debt service
coverage.

Governance is a key driver of all initial charter school rating
assignments. Key considerations include the academy's strong
relationship with its authorizer, the Utah State Charter School
Board, and adherence to all terms of its perpetual charter
agreement. The academy's effective board leadership and management
capabilities are instrumental in supporting its operational and
financial stability.

RATING OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects the likelihood that the academy will
sustain adequate operating margins, liquidity, and debt service
coverage while meeting enrollment projections linked to its
expansion project.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OF THE RATINGS

-- Material increase to the academy's operating revenue

-- Demonstrated ability to reach enrollment targets following
facilities expansion

-- Maintenance of healthy operating margins of over 20%, with debt
service coverage consistently over 1.5x and sustained liquidity of
over 250 days cash on hand

-- Material reduction in leverage

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

-- Inability to meet post-expansion enrollment projections or
significant additional delays or cost overruns associated with the
project

-- Deterioration to the academy's liquidity or a material
narrowing of operating margins or debt service coverage

  -- Material decreases to the academy's spendable cash and
investments to total debt ratio

PROFILE

Voyage Academy, a non-profit charter school located in Clinton, UT,
opened for the 2013-2014 school year. The academy provides
expeditionary learning to approximately 530 students in grades K-6
at its single-site facility. Governed by a seven-member Board of
Directors, the academy is authorized by the Utah State Charter
School Board and consistently meets all terms of its perpetual
charter agreement.

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was US Charter
Schools published in April 2024.


WATERBRIDGE NDB: S&P Places 'B' ICR on Watch Pos on Merger With WBR
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all its ratings on WaterBridge NDB
Operating LLC (NDB), including the 'B' issuer credit rating and its
'B' issue-level rating on its term loan B, on CreditWatch with
positive implications.

S&P expects to resolve the CreditWatch placement when the companies
complete the merger.

WaterBridge NDB Operating LLC (NDB) announced its definitive
agreement to merge with WaterBridge Operating LLC (WBR) to create
one of the largest water midstream companies in the U.S., with
expected pro forma 2025 revenue above $750 million. S&P Global
Ratings expects the merger will close in the fourth quarter of
2025.

It was also announced it will simultaneously execute an initial
public offering (IPO).

S&P said, "The merger could strengthen our view of the combined
entity's competitive position. This is due to increased business
scale and diversification with broader E&P producer exposure. We
expect a combination of both companies will bolster operating
scale, with pro forma S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA expected
to be $370 million-$380 million in 2025, compared with NDB's S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA of $166 million for the
last-12-months (LTM) ended June 30, 2025. Further, we expect
increased and diversified customer base across broader E&P
producers. However, the combined company will exhibit basin
concentration, given the expectation that it will generate about
90% of revenue from the Delaware basin.

"We believe our financial risk profile assessment will remain
unchanged. We do not anticipate WBR's leverage of 7.5x for LTM
ended June 30, 2025, will cause a spike in the combined entity's
leverage (NDB's current leverage is 3.8x in LTM ended June 30,
2025). This is because we expect the company will use of a portion
of the IPO proceeds to redeem WBR's preferred equity, which we
include in WBR's leverage.

"The positive CreditWatch placement reflects the likelihood we will
raise the issuer credit and issue-level ratings on WaterBridge NDB
Operating LLC following the close of the merger and IPO. We will
resolve the CreditWatch placement when the transaction closes."



WATERBRIDGE OPERATING: S&P Places 'B-' ICR on Watch Positive
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
WaterBridge Operating LLC (WBR), 'B-' issue-level rating on its
term loan B, and 'B+' issue-level rating on its $100 million
super-priority revolving credit facility on CreditWatch with
positive implications pending regulatory approval of the
transaction, possibly in the fourth quarter of 2025.

On Aug. 22, 2025, WBR and WaterBridge NDB Operating LLC (NDB)
announced their intention to complete a merger, which it will
execute in tandem with an initial public offering (IPO).

If completed, S&P could view the combined company's competitive
position more favorably than that of WBR.
S&P said, "We also anticipate the combined company's S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA could be lower than WBR's current
7.5x because NDB has lower leverage.

"The merger could strengthen our view of the combined entity's
competitive position. This is due to increased business scale and
diversification with broader E&P producer exposure. We expect a
combination of both companies will bolster operating scale, with
pro forma S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA expected to be $370
million-$380 million in 2025, making the company one of the largest
water midstream companies in the U.S. Further, we expect increased
and diversified customer base across broader E&P producers. Still,
we do not see any material improvement basin-wise, given the
combined entity is expected to generate about 90% of its revenue
from the Delaware basin.

"We expect the combined company will have lower leverage than WBR's
current level. We believe the combined company would warrant an
improved financial risk profile assessment due to NDB's current low
S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage (3.8x for the last-12-months
ended June 30, 2025). Our expectation of a lower leverage also
considers the use of a portion of the IPO proceeds to redeem WBR's
preferred shares, which we deem 100% debt and include in WBR's
existing leverage calculation.

"The positive CreditWatch placement reflects the likelihood we will
raise the issuer credit and issue-level ratings on WBR following
the close of the merger and IPO. We will resolve the CreditWatch
placement when the transaction closes."



WEST PROPERTIES: Seeks to Extend Plan Filing Deadline to Sept. 19
-----------------------------------------------------------------
West Properties, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Mississippi to extend its period to file a
plan of reorganization to September 19, 2025.

The Debtor explains that it does not seek this extension for
purposes of delay, but rather, to allow the Debtor an opportunity
to fully formulate and file its proposed Plan.  

The Debtor claims that the extension will not result in any undue
prejudice to any creditor or other party-in-interest.

West Properties LLC is represented by:

     J. Walter Newman IV, Esq.
     Newman & Newman
     587 Highland Colony Parkway
     Ridgeland, MS 39157
     Tel: (601) 948-0586
     Email: wnewman95@msn.com

                      About West Properties LLC

West Properties LLC is a real estate company based in Holly
Springs, Mississippi.

West Properties LLC sought relief under Subchapter V of Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Miss. Case No. 25-11305)
on April 24, 2025.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated assets
between $500,000 and $1 million and estimated liabilities between
$1 million and $10 million.

Bankruptcy Judge Jason D. Woodard handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by J. Walter Newman, IV, Esq. at NEWMAN &
NEWMAN.


WOLFSPEED INC: Seeks to Sell Macom Shares in Private Sale
---------------------------------------------------------
Wolfspeed, Inc. and its affiliates seek approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division, to sell Macom Shares, free and clear of liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances.

The Debtors seek to consummate a private sale of equity in Macom
Technology Solutions Holdings Inc. through its broker, Wells Fargo
Securities LLC.

The Debtors believe the MACOM Shares Sale is fully in the ordinary
course of the Debtors' business.

The Debtors, together with their non-debtor affiliates are a
leading producer of wide bandgap semiconductors, silicon carbide
materials, and gallium nitride materials. The Company's products
are used in a broad range of applications, including electric
vehicles, motor drives, power supplies, military communications,
radar, satellite, and telecommunications. Established in 1987, the
Company’s headquarters are located in Durham, North Carolina and
the majority of the Company's products are manufactured at the
Company's production facilities in North Carolina, New York, and
Arkansas.

On June 22, 2025, the Debtors entered into that certain
Restructuring Support Agreement with an ad hoc group of secured
noteholder  that collectively hold, own, or control more than 97%
of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Senior Secured
Notes, an ad hoc group of unsecured noteholders that collectively
hold, own, or control more than 67% of the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of the Convertible Notes, and Renesas Electronics
America Inc. which holds, owns, or controls 100% of the outstanding
principal amount of loans under the Customer Refundable Deposit
Agreement.

As part of their routine investment strategy, the Debtors acquire
shares in companies as a result of various business transactions.
Debtor Wolfspeed, Inc. is currently the holder of 711,528 shares in
Macom, a publicly traded company, which are the proceeds of a
prepetition asset sale transaction.

The Debtors met certain milestones in the Prior Macom Transaction
that previously restricted the monetization of the MACOM Shares,
thereby allowing the Debtors to seek to consummate this proposed
sale of MACOM Shares earlier than
expected.

The Debtors propose to sell the Macom Shares through the Broker
with whom they are currently finalizing a broker agreement. The
Broker will assist the Debtors in finding a market buyer(s) for the
Macom Shares. Based on current market prices, the Macom Shares Sale
is expected to result in a net return of approximately $87 million
for the Company one month ahead of the scheduled monetization of
the Macom Shares.

All stakeholders, including the Consenting Creditors, support the
Macom Shares Sale. The transaction will not prejudice any party in
interest, and is the most efficient and value maximizing approach
to administering the Macom Shares Sale.

The Debtors believe that they need to monetize the Macon Shares
Sale as soon as possible to capitalize on the current value of the
Macom Shares. Given the volatility of the stock market generally,
the Debtors believe that this approach monetizes the Macom Shares
at fair market value and provides the most value to the Debtors'
estates by executing the sale while MACOM stock is trading at a
higher price. Any delay could result in the Debtors and their
stakeholders receiving less value for the sale of the Macom Shares.


        About Wolfspeed, Inc.

Wolfspeed, Inc. (NYSE:WOLF) is an innovator of wide bandgap
semiconductors, focused on silicon carbide materials and devices
for power applications. Its product families include silicon
carbide materials and power devices targeted for various
applications such as electric vehicles, fast charging and renewable
energy and storage.

On June 30, 2025, Wolfspeed, Inc. and Wolfspeed Texas, LLC each
filed petitions seeking relief under chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 25-90163),
with Judge Christopher M. Lopez presiding. The Debtors sought
Chapter 11 protection after reaching a deal with lenders on a
debt-for-equity plan that would reduce debt by $4.6 billion.

Latham & Watkins LLP and Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP are serving as
legal counsel to Wolfspeed, Perella Weinberg Partners is serving as
financial advisor and FTI Consulting is serving as restructuring
advisor. Epiq is the claims agent.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is serving as legal
counsel to the senior secured noteholders and Moelis & Company is
serving as the senior secured noteholders' financial advisor.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal counsel to Renesas
Electronics Corporation, PJT Partners is serving as its financial
advisor, and BofA Securities is serving as its structuring
advisor.

Ropes & Gray LLP is serving as legal counsel to the convertible
debtholders and Ducera Partners is serving as financial advisor to
the convertible debtholders.


WOLFSPEED INC: US Trustee Opposes Chapter 11 Plan Opt-Outs
----------------------------------------------------------
Ben Zigterman of Law360 reports that on Friday, August 22, 2025, a
Texas bankruptcy judge directed the U.S. Trustee to add two trade
creditors to the creditors committee of multistate nursing home
operator Genesis Healthcare, finding the panel was overly weighted
toward tort claimants.

                 About Wolfspeed Inc.

Wolfspeed, Inc. (NYSE:WOLF) is an innovator of wide bandgap
semiconductors, focused on silicon carbide materials and devices
for power applications. Its product families include silicon
carbide materials and power devices targeted for various
applications such as electric vehicles, fast charging and renewable
energy and storage.

On June 30, 2025, Wolfspeed, Inc. and Wolfspeed Texas, LLC each
filed petitions seeking relief under chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 25-90163),
with Judge Christopher M. Lopez presiding. The Debtors sought
Chapter 11 protection after reaching a deal with lenders on a
debt-for-equity plan that would reduce debt by $4.6 billion.

Latham & Watkins LLP and Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP are serving as
legal counsel to Wolfspeed, Perella Weinberg Partners is serving as
financial advisor and FTI Consulting is serving as restructuring
advisor. Epiq is the claims agent.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP is serving as legal
counsel to the senior secured noteholders and Moelis & Company is
serving as the senior secured noteholders' financial advisor.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal counsel to Renesas
Electronics Corporation, PJT Partners is serving as its financial
advisor, and BofA Securities is serving as its structuring
advisor.

Ropes & Gray LLP is serving as legal counsel to the convertible
debtholders and Ducera Partners is serving as financial advisor to
the convertible debtholders.


WPB HOLDINGS: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor:       WPB Holdings Group LLC
                      621 Lakes Rd
                      Monroe NY 10950

Business Description: WPB Holdings Group LLC is a single-asset
                      real estate debtor, as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B).

Involuntary Chapter
11 Petition Date:     August 25, 2025

Court:                United States Bankruptcy Court
                      Southern District of New York

Case No.:             25-35913

Judge:                Hon. Kyu Young Paek

Petitioners' Counsel: Pro Se

A full-text copy of the Involuntary Petition is available for free
an PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/2JFU4SY/WPB_Holdings_Group_LLC__nysbke-25-35913__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

Alleged creditor who signed the petition:

Petitioner                   Nature of Claim         Claim Amount

David Rachman                 Loan Confession              $38,500
331 Kingston Ave
Brooklyn NY 11213


XTREME QUALITY: Seeks Subchapter V Bankruptcy in Florida
--------------------------------------------------------
On August 15, 2025, Xtreme Quality Logistic LLC filed Chapter 11
protection in the Middle District of Florida. According to court
filing, the Debtor reports between $100,000 and $500,000 in debt
owed to 1 and 49 creditors. The petition states funds will be
available to unsecured creditors.

         About Xtreme Quality Logistic LLC

Xtreme Quality Logistic LLC is an Orlando-based logistics company
that provides logistics and transportation services.

Xtreme Quality Logistic LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 25-05194) on August
15, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $100,000 and $500,000 each.

The Debtor is represented by Latham Luna Eden & Beaudine LLP.


[] Suppliers Struggle Amid Expensive Bankruptcy Cases
-----------------------------------------------------
Becky Yerak of The Wall Street Journal reports that an increasing
number of Chapter 11 debtors are failing to pay for goods and
services obtained during bankruptcy, leaving suppliers and service
providers with heavy losses when restructurings collapse. Vendors
and service providers that continue doing business with bankrupt
companies are typically among the highest-priority creditors. But
more often, even these claims are going unpaid -- a problem known
as administrative insolvency.

Court filings show that Steward Health Care, solar installer iSun,
and retailers Rite Aid, Big Lots, and Party City are among debtors
struggling, or potentially unable, to cover all of their
administrative expenses. Data from Octus indicates that 17% of
Chapter 11 cases with more than $100 million in debt have been
dismissed or converted to liquidation this year because of
administrative insolvency—nearly double last year's 9% and part
of a steady rise since 2018.

"This is becoming a recurring issue," U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kate
Stickles said in May while dismissing the bankruptcy of Liberated
Brands, owner of Quiksilver and Billabong, after it failed to pay
administrative costs. The decision left landlords, apparel makers,
and a staffing company unpaid.

According to The Wall Street Journal, lawyers and restructuring
advisers, though also administrative creditors, are usually paid in
full because their fees are protected through carve-outs from loan
proceeds. By contrast, landlords and trade vendors often bear the
losses. Experts attribute the trend to companies entering Chapter
11 with increasingly debt-heavy balance sheets, leaving fewer
unencumbered assets to satisfy claims. Secured lenders with liens
are first in line, reducing what remains for vendors who must
legally be paid in full for a Chapter 11 plan to be confirmed.

Liberated Brands cited weak asset sales for its insolvency, while
the Justice Department's bankruptcy watchdog criticized the company
for not warning vendors of likely nonpayment. Staffing firm Jobs R
Us, which supplied warehouse workers for Liberated, says it is owed
roughly $550,000.

Attorneys also point to overly optimistic forecasts, limited
financing, and strict lender budgets as contributing factors. In
cash-strapped sectors like retail and healthcare, funds are quickly
depleted. Party City, for instance, underestimated rent obligations
and overestimated sale proceeds, leaving landlords and vendors
expecting to recover just 33 cents on the dollar of $16.5 million
in claims. The company has since warned that administrative
liabilities may exceed $20 million, potentially reducing recoveries
even further, the report states.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Randy Antoni, Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante,
Rousel Elaine Tumanda, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Psyche A. Castillon,
Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and
Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2025.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The single-user TCR subscription rate is $1,400 for six months
or $2,350 for twelve months, delivered via e-mail.  Additional
e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term
of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each per
half-year or $50 annually.  For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***