---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, April 15, 2025, Vol. 29, No. 104

                            Headlines

180 LA PATA 2020: Case Summary & Nine Unsecured Creditors
23ANDME HOLDING: Gulp Values Data Assets at $289M Amid Bankruptcy
ADDISON STATION: Case Summary & 11 Unsecured Creditors
AETIUS COMPANIES: Amends Unsecured Claims Pay Details
AIBOTICS THERAPIES: Faces $1.85 Million Net Loss in 2024

AMERICAN ELITE: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
ANNALEE DOLLS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ARC ONE PROTECTIVE: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral
BATH & BODY: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB+' on Consistent Performance
BEELINE HOLDINGS: Registers $3.5M More Shares Under ELOC Agreement

BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL: Cuts 2024 Net Loss by 49%, Revenue Down 11%
BLUE DOG: Unsecured Creditors Will Get 5% of Claims in Plan
BRAVO RESIDENTIAL 2025-CES1: Fitch Gives B(EXP) Rating on B2 Notes
BYJU'S ALPHA: Sues Byju Raveendran for $533M Loan Fund Theft
CAMPBELL FAMILY: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral

CARGO LIFTS: Court OKs Interim Use of Cash Collateral
CAROLINA PROUD: Hearing to Use Cash Collateral Set for May 14
CARRUTH COMPLIANCE: Hires Robert E. Kellogg PC as Special Counsel
CELESTIAL PRODUCTS: Hires Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney as Attorney
CHANTILLY ROAD: Hires Epport Richman as Special Counsel

CHARLES K. BRELAND: Faces Sanctions in Hudgens, et al. Suit
CLARK ATLANTA: Moody's Affirms 'Ba1' Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable
CLEAN AIR CAR: Court Affirms Dismissal of Bankruptcy Appeal
CLEAN AIR CAR: Court Tosses Motions for Sanctions
CLOUTER CREEK: Hires Burr & Forman LLP as Special Counsel

CLOUTER CREEK: Hires Lempesis Law Firm as Special Counsel
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE: Hires Blankenship CPA Group as Tax Preparer
COOL SPRINGS: ECI Wins Summary Judgment in Wingspire Suit
CRICKET AUTOMOTIVE: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
CUMULUS MEDIA: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa3, Outlook Remains Negative

D2 GOVERNMENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DOUBLE HELIX: Hires Foster Garvey PC as Special Counsel
E.W. SCRIPPS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'SD' on Debt Restructuring
ECS BRANDS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ELECTRO SALES: Mr. W Lease Contract Void Not Voidable, Court Says

ELEGANZA TILES: Hires Curd Galindo & Smith LLP as Counsel
ENDO INT'L: PI Claimant Loses Bid to Modify Chapter 11 Plan
ENNIS I-45 11: Hires Shannon & Lee LLP as Legal Counsel
EQUIPSOURCE LLC: Hires Brister Law Firm as Legal Counsel
FAIR ANDREEN: Hires Kerkman & Dunn as General Counsel

FASHIONABLE INC: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Tennessee
FERRELLGAS PARTNERS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CCC+', Outlook Negative
FF FUND I: Founder's Motions to Suppress in Fraud Case Denied
FIRESTAR DIAMOND: Court Orders Bhansalis to Produce Tax Returns
FIRST CLASS MOVING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

FORTUNA AUCTION: Court Stays FLSA Suit as to Herbert John Saxon
GAUCHO GROUP: Nasdaq to Delist Common Stock After Suspension
GENESIS GLOBAL: Moro's Administrative Expense Claim Request Nixed
GIRARD HOUSE: Claims to be Paid From Property Sale Proceeds
HARRIS ENERGY: Findings of Fact in Two Adversary Cases Issued

HERITAGE COLLEGIATE: Amends Unsecured Claims Pay Details
HERTZ CORP: Musacchio Labor Suit Dismissed as Void Ab Initio
HIGH POINT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
HYPERSCALE DATA: Stockholders OK Series G Stock Conversion
IRONWOOD GROUP: Hires Kutner Brinen Dickey as Legal Counsel

K&NN TRUCKING: Continued Operations to Fund Plan Payments
KC TRANSPORT: Hires Lee Suess LLC as Accountant
KENBENCO INC: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to May 21
KOLOGIK LLC: Dundon's Summary Judgment Bid in Thomas Suit Denied
KYTTO ENTERPRISE: Hires Vilarino & Associates LLC as Counsel

LAND AND LAWN: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
LEGENDARY FIELD: Dundon's Summary Judgment Bid Granted in Part
LOCAL EATERIES: Hearing to Use Cash Collateral Set for April 16
LUMEE LLC: Court Issues Findings of Fact in Fernandez Case
LYTTON VINEYARD: Claims to be Paid From Asset Sale Proceeds

MAINE BOULEVARD: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Florida
MARIN SOFTWARE: Board OKs Amended Severance Agreements
MAT TRANSPORT: Hires I&S Tax Service LLC as Accountant
MIRAMAR TOWNHOMES: Unsecured Claims Under $1K to Recover 40%
MMK FAMILY: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral

MOBIVITY HOLDINGS: Narrows Net Loss of $10.23 Million in 2024
MOONEY HOUSE: Loses Bid to Extend Plan Exclusivity Period
ORIGINAL MOWBRAY'S: Unsecured Creditors to Split $16M in Plan
PHOENIX SWIMMING: Court Dismisses Involuntary Chapter 11 Petition
PREDICTIVE ONCOLOGY: Posts $12.66M 2024 Loss Amid Ongoing Struggles

PRIME ELECTRICAL: Gets OK to Use Cash Collateral Until June 5
PUBLISHERS CLEARING: Files for Chap. 11 in S.D.N.Y. to Restructure
RIVERSTONE RESORT: Court Issues Nothing Judgment in Ali Lawsuit
RONALD JINSKY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ROYAL PAPER: Files Voluntary Chapter 11 to Facilitate Sale Process

SCIENTIFIC ENERGY: Needs More Time to Finalize 10-K Filing
SOLUNA HOLDINGS: Case Study on Luxor, BitMine Partnership
STARR RAIL: Case Summary & Eight Unsecured Creditors
SUSHI ZUSHI: Court Can't Confirm Ch. 11 Plans Under Sec. 1191(a)
SWC INDUSTRIES: Updates Several Claims Pay; Files Amended Plan

TAMPA BRASS: Committee Hires Erik Johanson PLLC as Counsel
TEXAS AUTO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TEXAS REIT: Amends WCW Houston & Dalio Secured Claims Pay
TEXAS SOLAR: Unsecureds Will Get 100% of Claims over 5 Years
TLC MEDICAL: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to May 15

URBAN ONE: Moody's Downgrades CFR to 'Caa2', Outlook Negative
US COATING: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral Until April 29
US LIGHTING: Delays Annual Report Filing Due to CFO Vacancy
US LIGHTING: Director Olga Smirnova Resigns From Board
VANTAGE POINT: Hires Kerkman & Dunn as General Counsel

VIDEO RIVER: Delays 10-K Filing for Audit Completion
VMR CONTRACTORS: Loses Bid to Modify Structural Iron Workers CBA
WALS TRANSPORT: Seeks to Hire Slocum Law as Counsel
WOODLAND PLACE: Hires Berger Singerman as Legal Counsel
WORLD OF MISTRY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

WST INDUSTRIES: Hires Everett Gaskins Hancock as Counsel
XRC LLC: Hires Ausley & McMullen as Special Counsel

                            *********

180 LA PATA 2020: Case Summary & Nine Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 180 La Pata 2020, LLC
        180 Avenida LaPata
        2nd Floor
        San Clemente, CA 92673

Business Description: 180 La Pata 2020, LLC is a single-asset real
                      estate debtor, as defined under 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B).  The Debtor owns a
                      commercial property located at 180 Avenida
                      La Pata, San Clemente, CA 92673, with an
                      estimated current value of $7.3 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware

Case No.: 25-10690

Judge: Hon. Karen B Owens

Debtor's Counsel: Charles J. Brown, III, Esq.
                  GELLERT SEITZ BUSENKELL & BROWN, LLC
                  1201 N. Orange Street, Suite 300
                  Wilmington, DE 19801
                  Tel: 302-425-5813
                  Fax: 302-425-5814
                  Email: cbrown@gsbblaw.com

Total Assets: $8,062,969

Total Liabilities: $60,112,922

The petition was signed by Patrick Steven Nelson as managing
member.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's nine unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/XI3R5RA/180_La_Pata_2020_LLC__debke-25-10690__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


23ANDME HOLDING: Gulp Values Data Assets at $289M Amid Bankruptcy
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gulp Data, a leader in data valuation and collateralization,
estimates that the market comparable value of 23andMe's data assets
is approximately $289 million. This valuation comes as concerns
mount over the fate of the company's vast genetic database
following its financial struggles.

23andMe, a pioneer in consumer genetic testing, has built an
extensive dataset containing valuable genomic and health-related
information. However, as recent reports highlight, the company's
financial instability raises questions about how these assets might
be treated in a potential bankruptcy scenario. While consumer
genetic data is highly sensitive, it remains a lucrative asset
class in high demand among biotech firms, pharmaceutical companies,
and research institutions.

"Data is one of the most valuable assets a company owns, yet its
worth is often overlooked or misunderstood," said Lauren Cascio,
co-founder of Gulp Data. "Our valuations leverage market comps,
proprietary pricing models, and machine intelligence to determine
fair market value for data assets. While we haven't seen 23andMe's
actual data, our estimate is based on a blended model derived from
comparable market data, including subscription pricing and one-time
sale revenue. Despite the company's financial troubles, its dataset
likely remains a highly valuable and monetizable resource."

Gulp Data specializes in assessing, pricing, and monetizing data
assets for businesses, investors, and lenders. The company's
platform enables organizations to use data as collateral,
underwrite data assets, and monetize data, bringing transparency to
the data economy and allowing enterprises to extract financial
value from their information holdings.

As the situation with 23andMe develops, Gulp Data continues to
advocate for greater recognition of data as a legitimate balance
sheet asset. Companies that fail to accurately assess and protect
their data assets risk undervaluing one of their most significant
sources of potential revenue.

For media inquiries, please contact: Maxine Lorenzo.
press@gulpdata.com. (360) 215-5317.

About Gulp Data

Gulp Data is a pioneering data valuation and collateralization
platform that helps businesses unlock the financial potential of
their data. By leveraging market comps, machine intelligence, and
proprietary methodologies, Gulp Data enables companies to assess
and utilize data as a strategic asset in transactions, lending, and
corporate finance.

                          About 23andMe

23andMe is a genetics-led consumer healthcare and biotechnology
company empowering a healthier future. Through its
direct-to-consumer genetic testing, 23andMe offers personalized
insights into ancestry, genetic traits, and health risks. The
Company has developed a large database of genetic information from
over 15 million customers, enabling it to provide health and
carrier status reports and collaborate on genetic research for drug
development. On the Web: http://www.23andme.com/   

On March 23, 2025, 23andMe Holding Co. and 11 affiliated debtors
each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Lead Case No.
25-40976).

The Company disclosed $277,422,000 in total assets against
$214,702,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2024.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP; Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP; and Carmody MacDonald PC are serving as legal counsel
to 23andMe and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as restructuring
advisor. Lewis Rice LLC, Moelis & Company LLC, and Goodwin Procter
LLP are serving as special local counsel, investment banker, and
legal advisor to the Special Committee of 23andMe's Board of
Directors, respectively. Reevemark and Scale are serving as
communications advisors to the Company. Kroll is the claims agent.


ADDISON STATION: Case Summary & 11 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Addison Station LLC
        6232 Addison Road
        Capitol Heights, MD 20743

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 10, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Maryland

Case No.: 25-13129

Debtor's Counsel: Steven L. Goldberg, Esq.
                  MCNAMEE HOSEA, P.A.
                  6404 Ivy Lane, Suite 820
                  Greenbelt, MD 20770
                  Tel: (301) 441-2420
                  Fax: (301) 982-9450
                  E-mail: sgoldberg@mhlawyers.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Alan C. Gault, Jr. as authorized
representative.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 11 unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/FFJHSIY/Addison_Station_LLC__mdbke-25-13129__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


AETIUS COMPANIES: Amends Unsecured Claims Pay Details
-----------------------------------------------------
Aetius Companies, LLC, and its affiliates submitted a Third Amended
Joint Disclosure Statement describing Second Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization dated March 16, 2025.

The Plan provides that the Plan Debtor and Affiliated Plan Debtors
will continue to operate their business as Reorganized Plan Debtor
and Reorganized Affiliated Plan Debtors, respectively, and Mark
Cote, the current Chief Executive Officer for the enterprise, will
continue in that position for the Reorganized Debtors.

The Reorganized Debtors will assume the non-residential real
property leases, as may be modified, for the three stores that
remain open and will also assume any executory contracts that are
necessary for the continued operation of the Reorganized Plan
Debtor and Reorganized Affiliated Plan Debtors. The Plan Debtor
will pay any arrearages or other costs required by the Bankruptcy
Code to assume and/or take assignment such leases and those
executory contracts necessary for the Reorganized Plan Debtor's and
Reorganized Affiliated Plan Debtors' post-confirmation operations
(the "Cure Amounts") on the Effective Date, except as otherwise
agreed by the Reorganized Debtors and the counterparty to such
contract.

The Plan Debtors will pay Allowed Administrative Expense Claims in
full on the Effective Date or upon such other mutually acceptable
terms as the parties may agree. Any and all priority taxes due and
owing to the Internal Revenue Service, or any other state, county
or city taxing authority shall be paid in full as set forth more
fully in the Plan.

For unsecured Trade Creditors, the Reorganized Plan Debtor will pay
such creditors a portion of their claims through the Liquidating
Trust as outlined in the Plan.

Under the Plan, in satisfaction of any pre-petition loans owing to
Axum Capital Partners Fund I, L.P., and its affiliates (together
"Axum"), as well as a new value contribution in the amount of
$400,000.00 paid to the Liquidating Trust, Axum or its designee
will be issued 100% membership interest in the Reorganized Plan
Debtor.

The Plan provides for payment in full of all Allowed Administrative
Claims on or shortly after the Effective Date of the Plan from
funds generated by The Debtors' operations. The Plan proposes for
payment of priority tax claims in full as outlined in the Plan. The
Plan further provides for partial payments to secured creditors and
unsecured creditors as outlined in the Plan.

Additionally, all equity in the Aetius Companies, LLC will vest in
Axum in full satisfaction of any prepetition loans or other amounts
owed to Axum or its affiliates, as well as new value provided by
Axum in the amount of $400,000.00 to the Liquidating Trust.

Class 3 consists of all Allowed General Unsecured Trade Claims,
which are trade vendors that provided goods or services to the Plan
Debtors prior to the Petition Date, including without limitation
any Unsecured Claims i) arising as a result of the rejection of an
executory contract and/or unexpired lease and ii) asserted by a
taxing entity against the Plan Debtors.

In full satisfaction of Allowed Class 3 General Unsecured Trade
Claims, each holder of an Allowed Class 3 General Unsecured Trade
Claim will be entitled to receive, in full payment of such claims,
a pro rata share of distributions to holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Trade Claims from the Liquidating Trust. The timing of
any such distribution shall be made in the discretion of the
Liquidating Trustee.

The assets of the Liquidating Trust shall consist of:

   * $1,700,000.00 payable to the Liquidating Trust as follows:

     -- $600,000 paid to the Liquidating Trust within 30 days of
the Effective Date through new value equity contributions in the
amount of $400,000 coming from the new equity holders in the
Reorganized Plan Debtor, and $200,000 paid as settlement of the
Released Claims.

     -- $600,000 paid to the Liquidating Trust, free and clear of
any Liens, Claims, or encumbrances, within 30 days of the Effective
Date from the Settlement Funds received and held by the Debtors
from a class action settlement reached in In re Broiler Chicken
Antitrust Litigation (End User Consumer Action), Case No.
1:16-cv-8637 (N.D. Ill.).

     -- $500,000 paid by the Reorganized Debtors to the Liquidating
Trust within 180 days of the Effective Date; and

   * All Chapter 5 Causes of Action shall be assigned to the
Liquidating Trust.

The Plan Debtors anticipate that all Allowed Administrative Claims
will be paid in full from funds generated from the Plan Debtors'
post-petition operations and/or the remaining balance of the
Settlement Funds after payment of the portion of the funds due to
the Liquidating Trustee. The Plan Debtors project to be
operationally solvent upon emerging from bankruptcy as the
Reorganized Debtors.

The Reorganized Debtors plan to continue operations following the
confirmation of the Plan. Based on the projected financials of the
Reorganized Debtors, the operations contemplated in this Section 4
will generate sufficient operating revenue to fund all payments
required by the Reorganized Debtors under this Plan.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement dated
March 16, 2025 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=nZiefr from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

       About Aetius Companies LLC     

Aetius Companies, LLC and affiliates operate a restaurant chain.

The Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. N.C. Lead Case No. 23-30470) on July
19, 2023. At the time of the filing, Aetius Companies reported
between $10 million and $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Craig Whitley oversees the cases.

The Debtors are represented by:

   Robert A. Cox, Jr., Esq.
   Hamilton Stephens Steele & Martin, PLLC
   525 North Tryon Street, Suite 1400
   Charlotte, NC 28202
   Tel: (704) 344-1117
   rcox@lawhssm.com


AIBOTICS THERAPIES: Faces $1.85 Million Net Loss in 2024
--------------------------------------------------------
Aibotics Therapies, Inc., filed its latest annual report on Form
10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, disclosing a net
loss $1.85 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2024 -- widening
from a $1.18 million loss in 2023.  The biotech firm noted that it
generated no revenue or associated costs from operations during
either year.

As of Dec. 31, 2024, the Company had $1.46 million in total assets,
$4.85 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $3.39 million.   

As of Dec. 31, 2024, the Company had $185,097 in cash and cash
equivalents compared to $279,134 at Dec. 31, 2023, a decrease of
$94,037 resulting primarily from cash used in operating expenses.
As of Dec. 31, 2024, the Company had undiscounted obligations in
the amount of approximately $1.1 million relating to the payment of
indebtedness due within one year.

As of Dec. 31, 2024, the Company had a working capital deficiency
of $4,666,666 down from a working capital deficiency of $3,394,768
as of Dec. 31, 2023.  As of Dec. 31, 2024 its current liabilities
were $4,851,763 and consisted predominantly of accrued interest,
convertible notes payable, and shares to be issued.  The Company
had an accumulated deficit of $10,809,256 as of Dec. 31, 2024, an
increase from an accumulated deficit of $8,960,981 as of Dec. 31,
2023.

Expenses from operations for the years ended Dec. 31, 2024 and
2023, consisted solely of general and administrative expenses.
General and administrative expenses consisted primarily of
consulting fees, board compensation, and legal and professional
services.  For the year ended Dec. 31, 2024 compared to the year
ended Dec. 31, 2023 the Company's general and administrative
expense increased by $1,018,093 or 165%, from $616,724 to
$1,634,817.  The increase in general and administrative expenses
was the result of increased amortization expenses of $607,664,
increase in board compensation of $101,250, increase in product
development expense of $178,665 and increase in consulting fees of
$47,000.

In its report dated April 11, 2025, Fruci & Associates II, PLLC,
the Company's auditor, issued a "going concern" qualification
citing that the Company has generated no revenues, experienced
negative operating cash flows, and has incurred operating losses
since inception.  These factors, among others, raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company indicated that its continued existence relies on the
management's ability to create profitable operations.  Management
is focusing most of its efforts on growing the business and
securing funding, but there is no guarantee that these efforts will
succeed. It cannot be assured that management's actions will lead
to profitable operations or resolve the Company's financial
challenges.  The Company added that in order to improve its
liquidity, its management is actively pursuing additional equity
financing through discussions with investment bankers and private
investors.

The complete text of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1763329/000109690625000487/tpia-20241231.htm

                          About AIBotics Inc.

Miami, FL-based AIBotics, Inc. is focused on advancing the study of
psychedelics for the treatment of mental health disorders.  The
Company supports the development of both natural and synthetic
molecules aimed at creating effective therapeutic solutions.
AIBotics also plans to leverage technology from its parent company,
Ehave, Inc., to collect research and clinical data, furthering its
exploration of psychedelics in mental health treatment.  Following
the acquisition of assets from Philon Labs, the Company intends to
utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to transform innovative ideas
into disruptive healthcare products through advanced engineering
and design, with the goal of enhancing patient care and
streamlining medical processes.


AMERICAN ELITE: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: American Elite Collision Center Corp.
        2123 Mannix Dr
        San Antonio, TX 78217-5913

Business Description: American Elite Collision Center Corp. is an
                      auto repair shop located in San Antonio,
                      Texas.  The Company provides collision
                      repair services, focusing on restoring
                      vehicles to their pre-accident condition.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas

Case No.: 25-50784

Judge: Hon. Michael M Parker

Debtor's Counsel: Robert C. Lane, Esq.
                  THE LANE LAW FIRM
                  6200 Savoy Dr Ste 1150
                  Houston TX 77036-3369
                  Tel: (713) 595-8200
                  Email: notifications@lanelaw.com

Total Assets: $383,371

Total Debts: $1,210,637

The petition was signed by Antonio Medina as CEO/owner.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 15 unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/HD6YF6Y/American_Elite_Collision_Center__txwbke-25-50784__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ANNALEE DOLLS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Annalee Dolls, LLC
        339 Daniel Webster Highway
        Meredith, NH 03253

Business Description: Annalee Dolls, LLC is an American company
                      known for its handcrafted felt dolls that
                      embody holiday themes and whimsical charm.
                      Founded in 1934, the business has become a
                      staple of collectible Americana, with its
                      headquarters and flagship store located in
                      Meredith, New Hampshire.  The Company
continues
                      to attract visitors and collectors with its
                      nostalgic products and scenic gift shop near
Lake
                      Winnipesaukee.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of New Hampshire

Case No.: 25-10232

Judge: Hon. Kimberly Bacher

Debtor's Counsel: William S. Gannon, Esq.
                  WILLIAM S. GANNON PLLC
                  740 Chestnut Street, Manchester, NH 03104
                  Tel: (603) 621-0833
                  E-mail: bgannon@gannonlawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Andrew Button, as the owner, signed the petition.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/NSK2DAY/Annalee_Dolls_LLC__nhbke-25-10232__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ARC ONE PROTECTIVE: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------
ARC One Protective Services LLC received final approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando
Division to use cash collateral.

The final order authorized the company to use its secured
creditors' cash collateral to pay the operational expenses set
forth in its budget.

As protection, secured creditors were granted a post-petition lien
on the cash collateral to the same extent and with the same
validity and priority as their pre-bankruptcy lien.

In addition, Arc was ordered to maintain insurance coverage in
accordance with existing loan and security documents.

                About Arc One Protective Services

Arc One Protective Services, LLC is a full-service security
practitioners' company.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-02191) on May 1,
2024, listing up to $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Aaron Cohen, Esq., a practicing attorney in Jacksonville, Fla.,
serves as Subchapter V trustee.

Judge Grace E. Robson oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

     Jeffrey Ainsworth, Esq.
     Bransonlaw, PLLC
     1501 E. Concord Street
     Orlando, FL 32803
     Tel: 407-894-6834
     Email: jeff@bransonlaw.com


BATH & BODY: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB+' on Consistent Performance
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on Bath & Body
Works Inc. (BBWI) to 'BB+' from 'BB'.

S&P said, "We also raised our issue-level ratings on the company's
unsecured notes with subsidiary guarantees to 'BB+' from 'BB' and
the company's unsecured notes without subsidiary guarantees to
'BB-' from 'B+'.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation the company will
sustain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of mid-2x over the
next 12 months amid a challenging macroeconomic environment.

The upgrade reflects BBWI's solid performance due to its good value
proposition and consistent execution. The company has established a
reliable, multiyear track record as a stand-alone entity following
the spin-off of Victoria's Secret & Co. in August 2021. Following
its marked growth during the pandemic, spurred by elevated demand
for soaps and sanitizers (sales grew 45% across fiscals 2020 and
2021), the company has since ceded only 7% of sales through fiscal
2024--significantly better than our expectations. S&P said, "We
attribute BBWI's better-than-expected business stability to its
good value proposition, including its affordable price point and
strong product innovation and new product speed capabilities, which
allow it to respond rapidly to changes in consumer preferences and
remain competitive in a highly fragmented industry with low
barriers to entry. Moreover, the company has maintained its market
leader position (estimated at about 20% market share) in its core
home fragrance and soaps and sanitizers categories. Given its
successful track record as an independent company and our more
favorable view of its business stability characteristics, we
revised our comparable ratings analysis modifier to neutral from
negative."

S&P said, "We continue to forecast above-average S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins of low-20% and low-single-digit
percent revenue growth over the next 12 months. For fiscal 2025, we
anticipate S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins decline up to
roughly 300 basis points (bps) to about 22% and remain around this
level through fiscal 2026. This largely stems from increased
product costs due to tariffs, investments in real estate and
product innovation, and strategic allocations toward technology and
marketing.

"Our forecast assumes that tariffs impact the majority of fiscal
2025 and persist through fiscal 2026, and that BBWI can mitigate
roughly half of increased costs through supplier negotiations and
price increases. We acknowledge the high level of uncertainty
surrounding these assumptions; however, we believe that the company
is more insulated than other specialty retailers from the direct
and indirect impact of tariffs given its largely domestic supply
chain and affordable price point.

"We note that fiscal 2024 adjusted EBITDA margins improved 50 bps
to 25.3% largely due to the company's cost optimization program. It
delivered about $155 million of cost savings in fiscal 2024 and
two-year cumulative savings of over $300 million. We expect a
modest wrap-around benefit from 2024 cost savings initiatives over
the next 12 months.

"We also forecast low-single-digit percent sales growth in fiscals
2025 and 2026. Although inflationary pressure from tariffs will
likely lead to lower consumer discretionary spending over at least
the next 12 months, we believe the company's strong product
innovation, targeted marketing initiatives, and technology
investments will support better retention rates and improved
customer acquisition metrics. Our forecast assumes some price
increases because of tariffs, offset by unfavorable traffic trends.
We also expect new opportunities in international markets and
adjacent categories--including men's, hair, lip, and laundry--and a
2%-3% increase in North American square footage will support
near-term sales prospects in an uncertain operating environment.

"We expect BBWI will maintain relatively stable credit metrics
while using free cash flow to maintain adequate liquidity and for
shareholder returns. BBWI will likely generate about $650 million
in free operating cash flow (FOCF) while sustaining S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage of around 2.5x over the next 12 months.
In fiscal 2024, the company generated $660 million of FOCF, which
it utilized for share repurchases, dividends, and debt reduction.

"Importantly, the company repurchased about $1 billion of senior
notes over the past two years, achieving its target 2.5x gross
adjusted debt to EBITDA (roughly 2.5x on an S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted basis) ahead of our previous expectation.
Therefore, we expect BBWI will balance shareholder returns with
maintaining a sizable cash balance to absorb unexpected operational
disruptions and support its seasonal working capital requirements,
which we estimate at roughly $500 million.

"The stable outlook reflects BBWI's commitment to its conservative
financial policy, good FOCF generation, and liquidity position of
roughly $1.2 billion that we believe will support its ability to
manage through a challenging operating environment."

S&P could lower its rating on BBWI if it expects its S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted leverage will sustain above 3x. This could occur
if:

-- Revenue, profitability, and cash flow deteriorate beyond our
current expectations, perhaps because of a more prolonged period of
reduced demand for discretionary categories--like bath, beauty, and
fragrance--or because of an inability to mitigate cost pressures
attributable to tariffs; or

-- It adopts a less conservative financial policy, such as
reducing its cash balances below S&P's current expectation to fund
share repurchases.

S&P could raise its rating on BBWI if:

-- It exceeds S&P's sales and EBITDA forecast and builds on its
long-term track record of profitable growth through international,
category, and channel diversification, leading it to view its
long-term stability and growth prospects more favorably. Under this
scenario, S&P would also view BBWI's business position as more
favorable; and

-- The company demonstrates a commitment to maintaining its
financial policy (S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of less than
2.5x).



BEELINE HOLDINGS: Registers $3.5M More Shares Under ELOC Agreement
------------------------------------------------------------------
Beeline Holdings, Inc. disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the Company filed
a Prospectus Supplement under its Registration Statement on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-284723) under which the Company is registering up
to an additional $3,500,000 of shares of common stock which may be
sold to the purchaser under that certain Amended and Restated
Common Stock Purchase Agreement and related Amended and Restated
Registration Rights Agreement (collectively ELOC Agreement) dated
March 7, 2025, as disclosed in the Company's Current Report on Form
8-K filed on March 10, 2025.

Such amount is in addition to amounts registered under Prospectus
Supplements filed thereunder on March 10 and March 26, 2025, which
register up to a total of $4,000,000 of such sales.

                    About Beeline Holdings

Beeline Holdings f/k/a Eastside Distilling, Inc. is a
forward-thinking mortgage lender leveraging cutting-edge technology
to simplify and streamline the home financing process. The company
is committed to providing a seamless, customer-centric experience
while expanding its presence in the mortgage industry.

The Woodlands, Texas-based M&K CPAS, PLLC, Beeline's former
auditor, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 1, 2024, citing that the Company suffered a net loss from
operations and used cash in operations, which raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Beeline incurred a net loss of $7.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2023. As of June 30, 2024, Beeline had $16,589,000 in
total assets, $18,523,000 in total liabilities, and $1,934,000 in
total stockholders' deficit.


BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL: Cuts 2024 Net Loss by 49%, Revenue Down 11%
------------------------------------------------------------------
BIO-key International, Inc. announced results for its fourth
quarter (Q4'24) and year ended December 31, 2024. BIO-key's 2023
results, which were restated and filed with the Company's 2023 Form
10-K, are reflected in this release for comparison purposes.

BIO-key CEO, Mike DePasquale commented, "From a strategic
standpoint, we substantially strengthened our business in 2024,
growing our high-margin software license fee revenue by 20% while
exiting our low margin services relationship with Swivel Secure to
focus on BIO-key solutions such as PortalGuard IAM and our
Identity-Bound Biometrics. This transition away from Swivel Secure
licensed solutions resulted in an 11% decline in 2024 revenue, but
enabled us to substantially improve overall profitability despite
lower revenue.

"We also reduced operating expenses by 6% in 2024 and reduced cash
used in operations by 23% to $2.91M in 2024 from $3.79M in 2023.
With this transition behind us, we are in a much stronger position
to grow and convert top-line revenue into bottom-line
contribution."

Recent Highlights

     * Partnered with California Ed Tech JPA to make BIO-key
solutions available to 195 member institutions serving over 2.6M
students.

     * Higher Education customers with 30,000+ users migrated to
BIO-key's PortalGuard IDaaS platform from its on-premises solution
and Wyoming Department of Education deployed PortalGuard IDaaS.

     * National Bank of Egypt deployed BIO-key Multi-Factor
Authentication and Single Sign-On solutions.

     * Initiated collaboration with engineering solutions provider
Guinn Partners to transform access control and cybersecurity for
IoT and autonomous systems.

     * Partnered with Fiber Food Systems to enhance security and
efficiency in the Food Tech sector.

     * Secured $910K order to upgrade Financial Services firm to
"fingerprint only," one-to-many biometric ID technology for its
customers.

     * Secured $500K in biometric user authentication orders from
leading international defense ministry; with follow- on orders
expected in 2025 under new purchase agreement.

     * Launched Amazon Web Services (AWS) Marketplace availability
for PortalGuard and Identity-Bound Biometrics.

Mr. DePasquale, continued, "Moving forward, we are seeing very
encouraging order demand for our solutions in national defense,
financial services and education applications and particular
strength in EMEA countries. We are seeing growing interest in our
unique capabilities in passwordless, phoneless and tokenless
authentication solutions which are best positioned to meet the most
pressing security and usability challenges. Our biometric solutions
are gaining solid traction in international markets across
government, financial services and civil defense applications.

"For example, in Q4'24 we secured a $910K contract with a long-time
financial services client to implement our biometric identification
technology across its branches. The customer has already enrolled
fingerprint biometrics for over 25M end-users and is now upgrading
to BIO-key's "fingerprint-only," one-to-many identification system.
Our solution is expected to trim approximately 30 seconds from each
customer interaction, resulting in both an improved customer
experience and substantial long-term savings.

"Our longstanding relationship with one of the world's most
esteemed defense ministries saw expanded deployment of our
biometric solutions in 2024, a trend we expect to continue in 2025
and beyond. We currently provide authentication and digital
security services for over 80,000 ministry personnel and believe
that deployment could double or triple in coming years. To date,
the ministry has generated $3.3M in total hardware and license
revenue, and we are now working under a new long term procurement
agreement initiated in Q3 2024.

"This past January, we forged a partnership with the National Bank
of Egypt, which is integrating BIO-key's PortalGuard IAM platform
and an industry-leading Identity Governance solution. This project,
led by our partner, Raya Information Technology, leverages
PortalGuard's advanced IAM, MFA, and SSO capabilities to secure the
digital identities of the bank's 30,000 employees, and we believe
there is potential down the road for this solution to be utilized
with its customers.

"BIO-key has also built an established and growing presence in
education across over 100 institutions serving over 4M end users.
In January, three additional colleges and universities migrated to
PortalGuard IDaaS and the Wyoming Department of Education deployed
PortalGuard IDaaS, adding a total of over 50,000 IDaaS end users.
Building on this momentum, after an extensive RFP and review
process, we executed a strategic partnership and Joint Purchase
Agreement (JPA) with California's Education Technology Joint Powers
Authority (Ed Tech JPA). The agreement makes PortalGuard an
approved IAM solution for the alliance's 195 K-12 schools and
districts, collectively serving over 2.6M students, uniquely
positioning our offerings to comply solve Ed Tech JPA member IAM
requirements, including compliance with emerging restrictions on
the use of personal mobile devices in schools.

"In an effort to seed future market opportunities, in December we
announced a strategic collaboration with Fiber Food Systems to
explore IAM use cases across the food industry. As part of this
agreement, we also acquired shares of Boumarang, Inc. from Fiber in
exchange for BIO-key stock. Boumarang is a pioneering force in
sustainable, AI-driven, hydrogen-powered, long-range drone
technology, a developing market with a clear need for a
state-of-the-art IAM solutions. The equity exchange strengthened
our balance sheet and paved the way to a strategic collaboration
with Guinn Partners to integrate our biometric technology with
Guinn's expertise in IoT and autonomous systems, targeting
applications across aerospace, defense, healthcare, logistics and
smart cities. These initiatives will take time to develop, but we
believe that each of them has the potential to create attractive
new commercial opportunities for BIO-key.

"We are off to a strong start in 2025 and believe we are well
positioned to deliver improved top- and bottom-line performance.
However, given the timing of large customer orders, our financial
performance has the potential to fluctuate significantly on a
quarter-to-quarter basis. Given increasing interest in our
biometric solutions, growing adoption of passwordless, phoneless
and tokenless IAM solutions, and the transition we executed in 2024
to a focus on higher-margin BIO-key solutions, we are very
optimistic regarding our prospects this year. We remain focused on
reducing costs to lower our breakeven level as we continue to
explore new markets and strategic partnerships that could advance
our path to sustained profitability and positive operating cash
flow."

The audit the Company's FY2024 financial statements has not been
completed by its independent registered public accounting firm as
of March 27, 2025 and are therefore subject to change.

     * 2024 revenues decreased approximately 11% to $6.9M from
$7.8M in 2023, largely due to BIO-key's exit from a Swivel Secure
Limited (SSL) distribution agreement and transition to selling
BIO-key branded solutions in the EMEA region. The impact of this
strategic decision contributed to more high-margin software license
fee revenue and a reduction in services revenue from third-party
products which carry a much lower gross margin. As a result, 2024
license fee revenue increased 20% to $5.2M in 2024 vs. $4.3M in
2023; service fees declined 50% to $1.1M in 2024 from $2.2 million
in 2023; and hardware revenue declined 47% to $0.6M in 2024 from
$1.2M in 2023.

     * In Q4'24 license fee revenue increased 77% to $1.0M;
services revenue decreased 28% to $0.3M and hardware revenue
declined 88% to $0.1M, also reflecting the impacts of the strategic
transition from SSL products and services toward BIO-key
solutions.

     * Gross profit grew to $5.6M in 2024 from $1.4M in 2023, due
to a $3.6M hardware reserve taken in 2023 and the impact of growth
in higher-margin license sales and a reduction in lower-margin
services and hardware revenue. Exiting the SSL agreement
contributed to lower costs to support deployments, including
software license fees included in sales of Swivel Secure offerings
vs. BIO-key's internally developed software solutions. This
resulted in gross profit increasing to $1.2M in Q4'24 vs. negative
$95,496 in Q4'23, which included a $1.1M hardware reserve. Both
Q4'24 and 2024 gross profit benefited from the sale of $213,005 of
fully reserved hardware inventory.

     * BIO-key reduced its operating expenses by $606,409 to $9.7M
in 2024 from $10.3M in 2023, due to a reduction of SG&A costs by
$722,563, partially offset by a $116,154 increase in research,
development and engineering expense to support new product
development. Proactive cost reductions included lower headquarters
expenses, sales personnel costs, and marketing show expenses,
partially offset by an increase in professional services,
principally related to financing activities. BIO-key's Q4'24
operating expenses were flat year-over-year at $2.6M.

     * Reflecting greater gross profit and lower operating
expenses, BIO-key's 2024 net loss improved to $4.3M, or ($2.10) per
share, from a net loss of $8.7M, or ($15.21) per share, in 2023.
Similarly, BIO-key's Q4'24 net loss improved to $1.6M, or ($0.53)
per share, vs. $2.4M, or ($3.99) per share, in Q4'23. 2023 Results
included hardware reserves of $3.6M and $1.086M in 2023 and Q4'23,
respectively. 2024 results included a positive hardware reserve
adjustment of $213,005 in Q4 for the sale of hardware that was
previously reserved.

Balance Sheet

As of December 31, 2024, BIO-key had $1.9M of current assets,
including $438,000 of cash and cash equivalents, $0.8M of net
accounts receivable and due from factor, and $378,000 of inventory.
This compares to current assets of $2.6M at December 31, 2023,
including approximately $511,000 of cash and cash equivalents,
$1.3M of net accounts receivable and due from factor, and $446,000
of inventory.

                          About BIO-key

Holmdel, N.J.-based BIO-key International, Inc., founded in 1993,
is revolutionizing authentication and cybersecurity with
biometric-centric, multi-factor identity and access management
(IAM) software securing access for over forty million users.
BIO-key allows customers to choose the right authentication factors
for diverse use cases, including phoneless, tokenless, and
passwordless biometric options. Its hosted or on-premise
PortalGuard IAM solution provides cost-effective, easy-to-deploy,
convenient, and secure access to computers, information,
applications, and high-value transactions.

Henderson, Nev.-based Bush & Associates CPA LLC, the Company's
auditor since 2024, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated June 5, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered
substantial net losses and negative cash flows from operations in
recent years and is dependent on debt and equity financing to fund
its operations, all of which raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


BLUE DOG: Unsecured Creditors Will Get 5% of Claims in Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Blue Dog In Boca, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Florida a Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization dated March 14, 2025.

The Debtor was established in 2022 and is a restaurant in Boca
Raton, Florida, offering elevated New American cuisine. The
restaurant features live music performances, including Latin
rhythms and Top 40 hits, creating a lively and energetic atmosphere
for diners.

Guests can enjoy vibrant entertainment alongside craft cocktails
and upscale cuisine, making for a dynamic dining experience. The
Debtor suffered financial setbacks, including a prolonged slow
period and embezzlement from management, which contributed to its
financial instability and eventual need for restructuring.

Creditors had until December 24 2024, to file claims. The Debtor
has scheduled claims, most of which are believed to be non
objectionable. The Debtor estimates a total of $446,465.64 in
general unsecured claims. Through this Plan, the Debtor intends to
restructure these obligations, to remain viable as a going
concern.

Creditors will receive payment from the Debtor from the cash flow
of the Debtor's operations for a period of five years.

This Plan provides for four classes of secured claims, one class of
administrative convenience claims, one class of priority unsecured
claims, one class of general unsecured claims, and one class of
equity security holders claims. General unsecured creditors holding
allowed claims will receive distributions, which the Debtor has
valued at approximately 5.00%. This Plan also provides for the
payment of administrative and priority claims.

The Debtor's financial projections show that the Debtor will have
projected disposable income of $22,323.00. The final Plan payment
is expected to be paid in the second quarter of 2030.

Class 6 consists of all allowed general unsecured creditors and
reclassified claims. The Class 6 general unsecured creditors and
claims shall share pro rata in a total distribution of $33,634.00.
Payments to Class 6 creditors will be made on a quarterly basis,
beginning in month 31 and continuing through month 60, in equal
installments of $2,802.83.

Unsecured creditors will be receiving a distribution of
approximately 5.00 % of their allowed claim(s), which is an amount
in excess of what claimants would receive in a hypothetical Chapter
7 proceeding, in which case such claimants would receive 0.00%. The
allowed unsecured claims total $672,677.70. This Class is
impaired.

Class 6 consists of the following: Joseph Cabrera ("Equity Security
Holders"). Equity Security Holders shall retain their prepetition
interests.

The means necessary for the implementation of this Plan include the
Debtor's cash flow from operations for a period of five years and
contributions from the Principals of the Debtor, but only if such
contributions are deemed necessary due to the Debtor
underperforming financially or the temporary need to a cash
infusion.

The Debtor's financial projections show that the Debtor will have
projected disposable income for a period of five (5) years (after
payment of all amounts under this Plan, as well as operating
expenses) of $22,323.00. To the extent that the Debtor performs
consistent with such financial projections, then such disposable
income will be utilized by the Debtor in the form of cash reserves,
in order to ensure that the Debtor will have sufficient cash over
the life of the Plan to not only make the required Plan payments
but operate its business without any concern of illiquidity.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated March 14, 2025
is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=hhZHsq from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Rachamin Cohen, Esq.
     Cohen Legal Services, P.A.
     1801 NE 123rd Street, Suite 314
     North Miami, FL 33181
     Telephone: (305) 570-2326
     Email: rocky@lawcls.com

                     About The Blue Dog in Boca

The Blue Dog in Boca, Inc. is a business located in Boca Raton,
Fla., that operates in the hospitality sector. Known for its
vibrant atmosphere, the establishment likely serves food and
beverages, catering to both locals and tourists in the area. It
positions itself as a community-oriented venue, providing
entertainment and a social gathering space.

Blue Dog in Boca sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 24-20655) with $100,001
to $500,000 in assets and $500,001 to $1 million in liabilities.

Judge Mindy A. Mora oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by Rachamin Cohen, Esq.


BRAVO RESIDENTIAL 2025-CES1: Fitch Gives B(EXP) Rating on B2 Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned expected ratings to BRAVO Residential
Funding Trust 2025-CES1 (BRAVO 2025-CES1).

   Entity/Debt         Rating           
   -----------         ------           
Bravo 2025-CES1

   A-1             LT AAA(EXP)sf Expected Rating
   A1A             LT AAA(EXP)sf Expected Rating
   A1X             LT AAA(EXP)sf Expected Rating
   A2              LT AA(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   A3              LT A(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
   AIOS            LT NR(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   B1              LT BB(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   B2              LT B(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
   B3              LT NR(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
   M1              LT BBB(EXP)sf Expected Rating
   XS              LT NR(EXP)sf  Expected Rating

Transaction Summary

Fitch expects to rate the residential mortgage-backed notes issued
by BRAVO Residential Funding Trust 2025-CES1 (BRAVO 2025-CES1) as
indicated above. The transaction is expected to close on April 15,
2025. The notes are supported by one collateral group that consists
of 3,886 primarily newly originated, closed-end second lien (CES)
loans with a total balance of $292 million, as of the cutoff date.

NewRez LLC (NewRez), PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (PennyMac), and
Nationstar Mortgage LLC dba Mr. Cooper (Nationstar), originated
approximately 28.8%, 34.1%, and 36.4% of the loans, respectively.
PennyMac, Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC (Rushmore), and
Shellpoint will service the loans. The servicers will not advance
delinquent monthly payments of principal and interest (P&I).

Distributions of P&I and loss allocations are based on a
traditional senior-subordinate, sequential structure with an
interest-only class A-1X, whose interest payments are made
pari-passu with class A-1A, based on their respective entitlements.
The sequential-pay structure locks out principal to the
subordinated notes until the most senior notes outstanding are paid
in full. In addition, excess cash flow can be used to repay losses
or net weighted average coupon shortfalls.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Updated Sustainable Home Prices (Negative): As a result of its
updated view on sustainable home prices, Fitch views the home price
values of this pool as 11.3% above a long-term sustainable level
(versus 11.1% on a national level as of 3Q24). Affordability is the
worst it has been in decades driven by both high interest rates and
elevated home prices. Home prices have increased 3.8% yoy
nationally as of November 2024, despite modest regional declines,
but are still being supported by limited inventory.

Closed-End Second Liens (Negative): The entirety of the collateral
pool is composed of newly originated CES mortgages. Fitch assumed
no recovery and 100% loss severity (LS) on second lien loans based
on the historical behavior of second lien loans in economic stress
scenarios. Fitch assumes second lien loans default at a rate
comparable to first lien loans; after controlling for credit
attributes, no additional penalty was applied.

Strong Credit Quality (Positive): The pool consists of
new-origination CES loans, seasoned approximately six months (as
calculated by Fitch), with a relatively strong credit profile
—weighted average model credit score of 736, a 37% debt-to-income
ratio (DTI) and a moderate sustainable loan-to-value ratio (sLTV)
of 77%.

Roughly 100% of the loans were treated as full documentation in
Fitch's analysis. None of the loans have experienced any
modifications since origination.

Sequential-Pay Structure with Realized Loss and Writedown Feature
(Positive): The transaction's cash flow is based on a
sequential-pay structure, whereby the subordinate classes do not
receive principal until the senior classes are repaid in full.
Losses are allocated in reverse-sequential order. Furthermore, the
provision to reallocate principal to pay interest on the 'AAAsf'
rated notes prior to other principal distributions is highly
supportive of timely interest payments to those notes in the
absence of servicer advancing.

Second lien loans that are delinquent for 180 days or more under
the Mortgage Bankers Association method will be subject to an
equity analysis and may be charged off, and, therefore, will cause
the most subordinated class to be written down. Despite the 100% LS
assumed for each defaulted second lien loan, Fitch views the
writedown feature positively, as there will be more excess interest
to repay and protect against losses if writedowns occur earlier. In
addition, subsequent recoveries realized after the writedown
(excluding active forbearance or loss mitigation loans) will be
passed on to bondholders as principal.

Unlike prior CES deals, excess interest is only available to repay
current or prior losses and not to turbo down the bonds. This has
resulted in a higher amount of credit enhancement compared to
structures with a partial turbo feature.

No Servicer P&I Advances (Neutral): The servicers will not advance
delinquent monthly payments of P&I. Structural provisions and cash
flow priorities, together with increased subordination, provide for
timely payments of interest to the 'AAAsf' and 'AA-sf' rated
classes. Fitch views the servicer advancing framework as neutral
because, with a projected 100% LS, no credit would be given for
advances on the structural side, and no additional adjustments
related to LS would be necessary.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative
Rating Action/Downgrade

This defined negative rating sensitivity analysis shows how ratings
would react to steeper market value declines (MVDs) at the national
level. The analysis assumes MVDs of 10.0%, 20.0% and 30.0%, in
addition to the model-projected 42.4%, at 'AAAsf'. The analysis
indicates there is some potential rating migration, with higher
MVDs for all rated classes compared with model projections.
Specifically, a 10% additional decline in home prices would lower
all rated classes by one full category.

Factors that Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive
Rating Action/Upgrade

This defined positive rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates how
the ratings would react to positive home price growth of 10% with
no assumed overvaluation. Excluding the senior class, which is
already rated 'AAAsf', the analysis indicates there is potential
positive rating migration for all rated classes. Specifically, a
10% gain in home prices would result in a full category upgrade for
the rated classes, excluding those being assigned ratings of
'AAAsf'.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Fitch was provided with Form ABS Due Diligence-15E (Form 15E) as
prepared by multiple third-party review firms. The third-party due
diligence described in Form 15E focused on credit, compliance, and
property valuation review. Fitch considered this information in its
analysis and, as a result, Fitch made the following adjustments to
its analysis:

- A 5% PD credit was applied at the loan level for all loans graded
either 'A' or 'B';

- Fitch lowered its loss expectations by approximately 78bps as a
result of the diligence review.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of ESG credit relevance is a score of '3', unless
otherwise disclosed in this section. A score of '3' means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity, either due to their nature or the way in which they are
being managed by the entity. Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores are not
inputs in the rating process; they are an observation on the
relevance and materiality of ESG factors in the rating decision.


BYJU'S ALPHA: Sues Byju Raveendran for $533M Loan Fund Theft
------------------------------------------------------------
BYJU's Alpha Inc., a Delaware special purpose financing vehicle
established by BYJU'S to receive proceeds of a $1.5 billion Term
Loan B, announced on April 9, 2025, that, following the $533
million judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware against Riju Ravindran and BYJU's' ultimate
corporate parent in India, it has filed a lawsuit against Byju
Raveendran, his co-Founder and wife Divya Gokulnath, and his
consigliere Anita Kishore. The lawsuit states that each of them
co-orchestrated and executed a lawless scheme to conceal and steal
$533 million of loan proceeds.

The ad hoc group of term loan lenders of BYJU's Alpha's Term Loans
stated: "On the heels of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court's recent
judgment against his brother and companies, this action is being
brought to now hold Byju Raveendran, the former CEO of BYJU's
Alpha, and two more of his co-conspirators -- namely his co-founder
and close business associate -- accountable for their roles in
masterminding the theft of more than half a billion dollars."

"It is clear that Byju, Divya, and Anita deliberately hid the
assets of BYJU's Alpha and repeatedly were deceptive about the
location of the money in order to steal funds rightfully owed to
the Lenders. In light of the Court's recent decision, there can be
no doubt that they acted unlawfully and tried to cover their
tracks, breaching fiduciary duties and making numerous
misrepresentations, among other misconduct, in the process. If it
is not abundantly clear to them by now, Byju and his cohorts will
soon learn that the laws of the United States are immutable, and
they can either choose to live the rest of their days as
international fugitives or face the music and return the money they
stole."

Timeline of the Theft of the Alpha Funds:

Starting in March 2022, mere months after receiving the Term Loans,
BYJU's Alpha, then under the control of the BYJU's enterprise,
defaulted on the credit agreement. In April, BYJU's allegedly began
the first in what was a series of systematic and unlawful
fraudulent transfers of the Alpha Funds. BYJU's Alpha, including
Byju and his brother Riju Ravindran personally, conceded defaults
had occurred by entering into numerous amendments and forbearances
to the credit agreement.

-- First, in mid-2022, BYJU's Alpha, acting at the behest of at
least Byju, Divya, and Riju, started transferring $533 million of
the Alpha Funds to Camshaft Capital Fund, LP, a sham hedge fund
with no investment track record and a listed headquarters with the
same address as a pancake restaurant, ostensibly in exchange for
receiving a limited partnership interest in the Camshaft Fund.

-- Second, on March 6, 2023, despite the Lenders notifying the
BYJU's enterprise of their exercise of remedies three days prior,
thus stripping it of all control of BYJU's Alpha and its assets,
Byju and Anita unlawfully sought to move the Camshaft LP interest
to a non-guarantor affiliate, Inspilearn LLC, for zero
consideration.

-- Third, on February 1, 2024, the same day BYJU's Alpha filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Inspilearn transferred the Camshaft LP
Interest to an offshore trust, which then purportedly fully
redeemed it.

-- Lastly, Inspilearn later moved the resulting funds to an
unidentified non-U.S. T&L subsidiary. It remains unknown whether
additional transfers have been made.

Byju's Pervasive and Extreme Web of Deception Exposed

In an effort to hide their tracks, Byju, Divya, and Anita
repeatedly misrepresented and contradicted themselves regarding the
use and location of the $533 million Alpha Funds.

1. Following discovery by Timothy R. Pohl, a seasoned restructuring
professional who replaced Riju as sole director of BYJU's Alpha, of
the transfers of the Alpha Funds to Camshaft, on September 13,
2023, BYJU's released an opaque statement in which it
"categorically denie[d] media reports which insinuated that BYJU's
was no longer a beneficiary owner of the funds," instead
representing that "an offshore subsidiary remains the beneficiary
of the money invested in high security fixed income instruments
invested with a multi-hundred billion dollar fund in the U.S."
Camshaft, however, was not a "multi-hundred billion dollar fund,"
and no "high security fixed income instruments" were received on
account of the Alpha Funds.

2. On January 14, 2024, when asked if the Alpha Funds still exist
during a call with the Lenders, Byju said, "[w]e have not touched
the money," and later stated that "more than $500 million" remained
"in cash and cash equivalents."

3. On March 15, 2024, BYJU's issued a statement in response to a
preliminary injunction ordered by the Delaware Bankruptcy Court
whereby the Court froze the Alpha Funds -- preventing their further
use or movement. In the statement, BYJU's represented that "the
said funds are safely parked in one of our subsidiaries and, as per
the order, it will rightfully remain there."

4. On October 4, 2024, after months of telling the Court and the
public that the Alpha Funds were safe and within BYJU's' control,
Byju did a 180-degree pivot, telling the Financial Times that
BYJU's "no longer had access to capital and the entirety" of the
Alpha Funds "had been spent." He also said "the company's
'strategy' of trying to conceal money from creditors 'has not gone
right.'"1

5. On October 9, 2024, Byju issued a declaration under oath to the
Delaware Bankruptcy Court swearing that the Alpha Funds had been
spent.

The Lenders added, "It is impossible to square Byju's
representations with his repeated statements to the Court,
investors, the public, and the lenders over the prior two years.
Either Byju has consistently lied about the whereabouts of the
Alpha Funds, or he violated a Court Order. It cannot be both."

In its lawsuit, BYJU's Alpha is seeking 1) an award of damages for
Byju's breach of fiduciary duties, 2) an award of damages for
Byju's, Divya's, and Anita's aiding and abetting of the breach of
others' fiduciary duties; 3) an accounting of the Alpha Funds; 4)
an award of damages for conversion and civil conspiracy; 5)
reimbursement of all attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses; 6)
reimbursement of interest expenses; and 7) any other relief that
the Court may deem just, proper, or equitable.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal counsel for GLAS Trust
Company, LLC, the administrative agent for the Lenders. Quinn
Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP is serving as legal counsel for
BYJU's Alpha.

                    About BYJU's Alpha

BYJU's Alpha, Inc., designs and develops education software
solutions.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 24-10140) on Feb. 1, 2024. In the
petition signed by Timothy R. Pohl, chief executive officer, the
Debtor disclosed up to $1 billion in assets and up to $10 billion
in liabilities.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the case.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.

GLAS Trust Company LLC, as DIP Agent and Prepetition Agent, is
represented in the Debtor's case by Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Pachulski
Stang Ziehl & Jones, and Reed Smith.


CAMPBELL FAMILY: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------
Campbell Family Enterprises, Inc. received final approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Mississippi to
use cash collateral.

The company requires the use of cash collateral to pay the expenses
listed in its budget and fund the payments of U.S. trustee and
Subchapter V trustee fees..

Cleveland State Bank asserts an interest in the company's assets,
including cash collateral.

As protection, Cleveland will be granted a replacement security
interest in, and liens on, all post-petition acquired property of
the company's estate that is similar to its pre-bankruptcy
collateral.

             About Campbell Family Enterprises Inc.

Campbell Family Enterprises, Inc. filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Miss. Case No. 25-10364) on February 4, 2025, listing up to
$500,000 in assets and up to $1 million in liabilities. The
petition was signed by Phillip Campbell as member.

Judge Selene D. Maddox oversees the case.

Thomas C. Rollins, Jr., Esq., at The Rollins Law Firm, PLLC,
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


CARGO LIFTS: Court OKs Interim Use of Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida,
Gainesville Division granted Cargo Lifts of North Florida, LLC
authorization to use cash collateral on an interim basis.

The interim order authorized the company to use cash, deposit
accounts, accounts receivable, and business proceeds in accordance
with its budget, with a 10% variance.

The budget projects total operational expenses of $181,756.76 for
April and May.

As protection, MCA funders were granted replacement liens on the
same types of collateral they had before the bankruptcy.

The MCA funders include CHTD Company, Family Funding Group, LLC,
Canfield Capital, LLC, Capytal.com, EBF Holdings, LLC, Forward
Financing, LLC, Fox Funding Group, LLC and WebBank.

A final evidentiary hearing is set for April 30.

                 About Cargo Lifts of North Florida

Cargo Lifts of North Florida, LLC filed a petition under Chapter
11, Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No.
25-10036) on February 10, 2025, listing between $100,001 and
$500,000 in assets and between $500,001 and $1 million in
liabilities.

Judge Karen K. Specie oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   Elena Paras Ketchum, Esq.
   Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A.
   Tel: 813-229-0144
   Email: eketchum.ecf@srbp.com


CAROLINA PROUD: Hearing to Use Cash Collateral Set for May 14
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North
Carolina is set to hold a hearing on May 14 to consider another
extension of Carolina Proud Investment Group, Inc.'s authority to
use cash collateral.

The court previously authorized the company to access cash
collateral on an interim basis.

The interim order issued on April 4 authorized the company to use
cash collateral to pay its operating expenses and granted secured
creditors, GREM, LLC and United Bank, post-petition liens on all
cash, payments, and receivables for collected and future rents by
the company.

United Bank is represented by:

   James S. Livermon, III, Esq.
   Womble Bond Dickinson (US), LLP
   555 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1100
   Raleigh, NC 27601
   Telephone: (919) 755-2148
   Facsimile: (919) 755-6048
   charlie.livermon@wbd-us.com

              About Carolina Proud Investment Group

Carolina Proud Investment Group, LLC owns and manages a portfolio
of residential and commercial properties, including rental units
and vacant land, across multiple locations in North Carolina and
Ohio.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. N.C. Case No. 25-01063) on March 24,
2025. In the petition signed by Anna Hromyak, member-manager, the
Debtor disclosed $1,035,550 in assets and $797,689 in liabilities.

Judge Pamela W McAfee oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   Christopher Scott Kirk, Esq.
   C. Scott Kirk, Attorney At Law, PLLC
   Tel: 252-689-6249
   Email: scott@csklawoffice.com


CARRUTH COMPLIANCE: Hires Robert E. Kellogg PC as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Carruth Compliance Consulting, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Oregon to employ Robert E.
Kellogg PC as special counsel.

The firm will provide general business and compliance related
advice.

will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly billing rates.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mr. Kellogg disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Robert E. Kellogg, Esq.
     Robert E. Kellogg PC
     7945 SW Mohawk St.
     Tualatin, OR 97062
     Tel: (503) 486-5041

              About Carruth Compliance Consulting, Inc.

Carruth Compliance Consulting, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. D. Or. Case No. 25-31060) on March 31, 2025. The
Debtor hires Sussman Shank LLP as counsel.


CELESTIAL PRODUCTS: Hires Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------------
Celestial Products USA LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ Joyce W.
Lindauer Attorney, PLLC to handle its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

       Joyce W. Lindauer      $595 per hour
       Paul B. Geilich        $525 per hour
       Laurance Boyd          $295 per hour
       Dian Gwinnup           $250 per hour

The firm will be paid a retainer in the amount of $25,000.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., a partner at Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney,
PLLC, disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
     Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC
     1412 Main Street, Suite 500
     Dallas, TX 75202
     Tel: (972) 503 4033
     Fax: (972) 503-4034

              About Celestial Products USA LLC

Celestial Products USA, LLC is an online retail business based in
Fort Worth, Texas.

Celestial Products USA filed a petition under Chapter 11,
Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Texas Case No.
25-40153) on January 16, 2025, listing up to $50,000 in assets and
between $1 million and $10 million in liabilities. Areya Holder
Aurzada, Esq., at Holder Law serves as Subchapter V trustee.

Judge Mark X. Mullin handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

     Robert Lane, Esq.
     The Lane Law Firm, PLLC
     6200 Savoy Dr Ste 1150
     Houston, TX 77036-3369
     Phone: (713) 595-8200
     Fax: (713) 595-8201
     Email: chip.lane@lanelaw.com


CHANTILLY ROAD: Hires Epport Richman as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Chantilly Road, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California to employ Epport, Richman &
Robbins, LLP as special litigation counsel.

The Debtor needs the firm's legal assistance in connection with
claims of usury against Hillfoot, LLC.

The firm will be paid at the rates of $650 per hour for partners,
and $485 per hour for associates.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Steven N. Richman, Esq., a partner at Epport, Richman & Robbins,
LLP, disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Steven N. Richman, Esq.
     Epport, Richman & Robbins, LLP
     1875 Century Park East, Suite 800
     Los Angeles, CA 90067-2512
     Tel: (310) 785-0885
     Fax: (310) 785-0787

              About Chantilly Road, LLC

Chantilly Road LLC owns a single-family home located at 1116 N.
Chantilly Rd., Los Angeles, CA 90077 having an appraised value of
$28.06 million.

Chantilly Road LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 24-13197) on December
15,2024. In the petition filed by Adrian Rudomin, as managing
member, the Debtor reports total assets of $28,510,000 and total
liabilities of $21,573,732.

The Debtor is represented by Michael R. Totaro, Esq. at TOTARO &
SHANAHAN, LLP.


CHARLES K. BRELAND: Faces Sanctions in Hudgens, et al. Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned as CHARLES K. BRELAND, JR., Plaintiff, v.
DAVID E. HUDGENS, ROBERT M. GALLOWAY, and GALLOWAY WETTERMARK &
RUTENS, LLP, Defendants, ADVERSARY PROCEEDING CASE NO. 24-1037-JCO
(Bankr. S.D. Ala.), Chief Judge Jerry Oldshue of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama granted David
Hudgens' motion for costs, including attorneys' fees and sanctions
against Charles K. Breland, Jr. and motion for sanctions against
Attorney Harry B. Still III pursuant to F.R.B.P. Rule 9011.

Charles K. Breland, Jr. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy ("Breland I")
on March 9, 2009. (Bankr. S.D. Ala., Case No. 09-11139). Hudgens &
Associates LLC and Equity Trust Company as Custodian for the
Benefit of David E. Hudgens IRA No. 41458, filed claims in the
case.

Breland made the initial payment required by the Breland I Plan but
refused to give the Hudgens Creditors security or make subsequent
payments. As a result, the Hudgens Creditors
sought post-confirmation enforcement of the Breland I Plan
provision in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama and
obtained a judgment for $2,189,342.96 on March 24, 2016.2 Breland
then filed another Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on July 8, 2016 ("Breland
II"). (Bankr. S.D. Ala. No. 16-2272). After a long, arduous, and
contentious process, a mediated Chapter 11 Plan was confirmed on
June 6, 2022, allowing for estimation and future disposition of the
Hudgens Creditors' Claims.

Breland and the Hudgens Creditors thereafter entered into a
Mediated Settlement Agreement which included terms for future
payment of a negotiated amount to the Hudgens Creditors.
The Agreement stated that it "resolved all claims, defenses,
objections, and/or disputes between the Movants through the date of
execution" and that releases would be executed, "covering all acts
and omissions through the date the settlement documents are
executed and delivered, whether or not causes of action have
accrued on such acts or omissions". The November 3, 2023 Order
approving the Agreement states that if either party breaches its
obligations thereunder, it would be responsible for "all costs
incurred by the other party as a result, including reasonable
attorneys' fees as determined by the Bankruptcy Court, which will
retain jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement."

Consistent with the Agreement, a Release was executed by Breland
and various related entities, on November 6, 2023, releasing the
Hudgens Creditors (including David E. Hudgens).

On or about Aug. 28, 2024, Charles K. Breland, Jr. by and through
counsel, Attorney Harry B. Still, III, commenced State Court
Litigation against Robert M. Galloway, Galloway, Wettermark &
Rutens, LLP, and David Hudgens, individually, in the Circuit Court
of Baldwin County Alabama. The allegations in the Complaint relate
to the 2009 Breland I bankruptcy, including Breland's contentions
that the Defendants made misrepresentations and conspired to
defraud him in obtaining confirmation of the Breland I Plan. In
addition to listing David Hudgens as a named defendant in the style
of the case, referring to him as a co-defendant in the body of the
Complaint, and including derogatory personal statements about him,
Breland's prayer for relief demands a judgment against Defendants,
David Hudgens, Robert M. Galloway, and Galloway, Wetermark &
Rutens, LLP jointly and severally, for compensatory and punitive
damages in an amount in excess of the jurisdictional limits of the
Circuit Court, plus interest, costs and other, further, and
different relief to which Breland may be entitled.

Hudgens also filed Motions for Sanctions, including Attorneys' Fees
and Costs, against Breland under 11 U.S.C. SEc. 105(a) and Attorney
Still under Rule 9011 based upon violations of the Settlement
Agreement and Release.

Hudgens timely removed the State Court Litigation to this Court
under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1452(a).

The Court concludes that Breland's filing of the State Court
Litigation against Hudgens was an attempt to harass Hudgens and
continue his long-standing vendetta against Hudgens, in direct
violation of the Compromise Order as well as the Release and
constitutes bad  faith. Additionally, Breland did not immediately
dismiss Hudgens from the State Court action upon demand. Only after
the State Court Litigation was removed to this Court, did he
indicate in his Response To The Show Cause Order and Motion for
Remand or Abstention that he, "intends on amending his Complaint by
dismissing his claims against creditor David A. Hudgens". Based on
these reasons, the Court finds that Breland's conduct is
sanctionable.

The Court finds the State Court Litigation claims against Hudgens
are frivolous because they violate the Compromise Order and Release
precluding Breland from suing Hudgens for any "claims, demands,
obligations, liability, actions, causes of actions, suits at law or
in equity of whatsoever kind or nature, whether based in tort,
contract, warranty, or other theory of recovery, and whether for
compensatory or punitive damages, known or unknown " through the
date thereof. Attorney Still admitted that he was aware of the
Release prior to initiating the State Court Litigation, yet he
signed and proceeded to file the Complaint which included Hudgens
as a named defendant and requested monetary damages against him.
Notwithstanding Attorney Still's contention that Hudgens was a
necessary party to an alleged conspiracy involving Co-Defendant,
Attorney Robert M Galloway, he failed to articulate any viable
legal basis that would allow such claims against Hudgens despite
the plain language of the Compromise Order and Release. Thus, this
Court finds that Attorney Still's conduct was frivolous, vexatious,
and an abuse of process.

Considering the plain language of the Release, which Attorney Still
admitted that he was aware of prior to filing the State Court
Complaint, this Court finds that he knew or should have known that
Breland could not pursue such claims against Hudgens and that the
litigation was frivolous. This Court concludes that Attorney Still
failed to make a reasonable inquiry into the matter before
initiating the State Court Litigation and that such unjustifiable
violation of this Court's Order and the Release is sanctionable.

The sanctions are assessed as follows:

   1. Sanctions in the amount of $32,586.22 are entered against
Charles K. Breland Jr. to compensate David Hudgens for the
reasonable and necessary attorneys' fees and costs incurred in
defense of this matter.

   2. Sanctions in the amount of $5,000.00 are entered against
Attorney Harry B. Still, III for violations of Rule 9011 and to
deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct by others
similarly situated.

   3. The sanction awards shall be payable to David E. Hudgens and
remitted in care of Attorney Jason (Jay) R. Watkins of Silver,
Voit, Garrett & Watkins no later than 60 days from the date of this
Order.

   4. The claims against David Hudgens are dismissed with
prejudice.

   5. Attorney Still is directed to attend and submit an affidavit
with supporting documentation to this court within the next 12
months evidencing that he has completed 3 hours of continuing legal
education on professionalism.

   6. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this
Order including but not limited to the imposition of additional
sanctions in the event of non-compliance.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=LkfOVI from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About Charles Breland Jr.

Charles K. Breland, Jr., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 16-02272) on July 8, 2016, and is
represented by Eric Slocum Sparks, Esq., at Eric Slocum Sparks PC.
A. Richard Maples, Jr., was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee for the
Debtor.  Debtor Osprey Utah, LLC, which is owned and controlled by
Charles K. Breland, Jr., owns real property.


CLARK ATLANTA: Moody's Affirms 'Ba1' Issuer Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings has affirmed Clark Atlanta University's (GA) Ba1
issuer rating. The outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The affirmation of the Ba1 issuer rating acknowledges Clark Atlanta
University's regionally important role as a historically black
university (HBCU), solid wealth and liquidity, and manageable
liabilities. The university's financial resources grew by 55% over
the last five years, providing solid coverage over debt and
expenses. Good liquidity also translated to 206 monthly days cash
on hand in fiscal 2024. However, while the university experienced
an increase in student interest in recent years, competitive market
conditions remain and drive low matriculation and retention rates.
Additionally, operating performance has been uneven the last few
years, weakening as a result of inflationary pressures and reduced
federal pandemic aid. Sustaining growth in net tuition revenue will
be challenging given a price sensitive student market and depth of
competition. Further, given a very high reliance on federal student
aid, the university is vulnerable to any federal policy shifts or
disruptions to student aid programs. Other credit considerations
include a high age of plant and ongoing exposure to a third-party
housing project under financial distress.

RATING OUTLOOK

The stable outlook is predicated on stable enrollment and
strengthened operations that drive at least break-even operating
results. The maintenance of solid cash and investments over
adjusted debt and operating expenses also support a stable
outlook.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OF THE RATING

-- A return to double-digit EBIDA margins sustained over a
multi-year period

-- Substantial growth in financial reserves reflected in coverage
total cash and investments to operating expenses near 2x

-- Reduced exposure to a poorly performing PPP housing project
without materially increasing total leverage

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE OF THE RATING

-- Material decline in coverage of total cash and investments to
adjusted debt below 2x

-- Significant decline in liquidity translating to below 150
monthly days cash on hand

-- Declining enrollment, or inability to sustain growing net
tuition revenue

LEGAL SECURITY

The Ba1 rating is an issuer rating not assigned to any debt.

PROFILE

Clark Atlanta University is a private, urban research university
that was established in 1988 from the consolidation of two
independent historically black institutions, Atlanta University
(1865) and Clark College (1869). In fiscal 2024, CAU generated
operating revenue of $136 million and enrolled 4,059 full-time
equivalent (FTE) students as of fall 2024.

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in this rating was Higher Education
published in July 2024.


CLEAN AIR CAR: Court Affirms Dismissal of Bankruptcy Appeal
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the appealed case styled as CLEAN AIR CAR SERVICE & PARKING
BRANCH THREE, LLC, et al., Appellants, -against- CLEAN AIR SERVICE
& PARKING BRANCH TWO, LLC, et al., Appellees, Case No.
24-cv-05444-OEM (E.D.N.Y.), Judge Orelia E. Merchant of the United
States District Court for the Eastern District Court of New York
denied  the motion for reconsideration filed by Appellants Clean
Air Car Service & Parking Branch Three, LLC, Clean Air Car Service
& Parking Corp., Operr Technologies Inc., Operr Service Bureau
Inc., and Kevin S. Wang of an order dismissing their bankruptcy
appeal and enjoining them from filing any additional appeal from
the underlying bankruptcy case, without first obtaining leave from
the court where they seek to file.

On July 25, 2024, the Debtor filed a Notice of (I) Effective Date
of the Joint Chapter 11 Plan for Clean Air Car Service & Parking
Branch Two, LLC, Proposed by the Debtor and IV-CVCF NEB I Trust, as
Modified On May 22, 2024, and (II) Certain Claims Bar Dates,
indicating that the plan became effective on that date. Appellants
filed their appeal on July 31, 2024, without seeking to stay the
effective date. Since that time, the Debtor has made distributions
to all holders of secured claims. Of the approximately $3.8 million
that was in the Debtor's estate prior to the Effective Date, over
$2.8 million in claim distributions and administrative
disbursements have been made and another $319,382.93 has been
approved for payment. All that remains in the Debtor's estate is a
reserve for the post effective date administration of the estate,
which includes making distributions to unsecured claimants after
resolution of claims objections (including an objection to the
claims that K. Wang and his affiliated entities filed). Under the
plan, a wind-down officer has been appointed and taken over the
administration of the post-effective date Debtor's estate,
including transferring the Debtor's bank accounts into accounts
under his exclusive control.

The Court reasoned that the equitable mootness doctrine allows
appellate courts to dismiss bankruptcy appeals when, during the
pendency of the appeal, events occur such that even though
effective relief could conceivably be fashioned, implementation of
that relief would be inequitable.

Appellants urge the Court to reconsider its Order, asserting that:

   (1) the Court overlooked material facts and controlling
authorities;
   (2) the Bankruptcy Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over
the bankruptcy appeal and therefore incorrectly applied the
mootness doctrine; and
   (3) the Court's Order enjoining the appeal should be revoked for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Neither argument warrants reconsideration of the Court's Order.

Appellants argue that the Court erred in applying the equitable
mootness doctrine because that doctrine applies to specific claims,
not entire appeals and their appeal is not related to any specific
claims, summarily citing as support U.S. Bank N.A. v. Windstream
Holdings, Inc. However, like this Court, the district court in In
re Windstream Holdings held that the appellants' request to stay
pending appeal was moot in light of the fact that the debtors had
substantially reorganized. As such, the In re Windstream Holdings
decision cannot reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion
reached by the court. Rather, it supports this Court's reasoning
for dismissing the appeal as equitably moot.

The Court finds Appellants' remaining arguments do not meet the
strict standard for reconsideration as they largely raise the same
arguments made in their appeal brief.

Appellants assert that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction
due to the unauthorized filing of the Bankruptcy petition and
therefore its Order enjoining future appeal is improper. This Court
and a myriad of other courts have flatly rejected Appellants'
position with sound legal authority. Because the Court has
jurisdiction over the appeal, Appellants' argument that the it
cannot fashion procedural safeguards to curb vexatious filings is
without merit.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=bFaI6C from PacerMonitor.com.

           About Clean Air Car Service and Operr Plaza

Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC, and Operr Plaza,
LLC filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead
Case No. 23-41937) on May 31, 2023.

At the time of filing, Clean Air Car Service reported $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities
while Operr Plaza reported $10 million to $50 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Nancy Hershey Lord oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Westerman Ball Ederer Miller Zucker &
Sharfstein, LLP, as bankruptcy counsel.


CLEAN AIR CAR: Court Tosses Motions for Sanctions
-------------------------------------------------
In the appealed case styled as CLEAN AIR CAR SERVICE & PARKING
BRANCH THREE, LLC, et al., Appellants, -against- CLEAN AIR SERVICE
& PARKING BRANCH TWO, LLC, et al., Appellees, Case No.
24-cv-05444-OEM (E.D.N.Y.), Judge Orelia E. Merchant of the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied
the motions for sanctions filed by Appellants Clean Air Car Service
& Parking Branch Three, LLC, Clean Air Car Service & Parking Corp.,
Operr Technologies Inc., Operr Service Bureau Inc., and Kevin S.
Wang against Appellees-Debtors Clean Air Service and Parking Branch
Two, LLC and Operr Plaza LLC and their attorneys Jay Hellman, Esq.,
Thomas Draghi, Esq., and the law firm Westerman Ball Ederer Miller
Zucker & Sharfstein, LLP.

The sanctions motions, filed less than two months apart, are made
under different mechanisms: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1927 and the Court's
inherent power, and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011.

Appellants seek sanctions against Debtors and their attorneys under
Section 1927 and the Court's inherent power asserting that Debtors
made false and misleading statements in their response letter to
Appellants' motion for emergency relief by order to show cause and
that such false statements caused this Court to erroneously dismiss
Appellants' appeal.

Appellants assert that Debtors' response letter contains no
evidence or information demonstrating that the determination of
whether the Buyer is a good faith purchaser has been made and the
Debtors have failed to prove that the Buyer is a good faith
purchaser. In opposition, Debtors argue that their response letter
did not provide any false material facts that misled the Court.
They argue that Appellants' motion for sanctions is rather another
attempt to repackage and relitigate issues already decided by
various courts.

Appellants are correct that the Court took judicial notice of the
detailed factual summary described in Debtors' response letter. But
the statements which Appellants now allege are false did not form
the basis of the Court's dismissal of the appeal. Rather, the Court
dismissed the appeal because it was equitably moot. Appellants have
not argued in their 1927 motion that these factual statements are
false or misleading. Thus, the notion that false statements by the
Debtors resulted in an Order issued erroneously by this Court is
misplaced.

Appellants have failed to proffer any arguments or evidence showing
Debtors engage in the type of conduct that courts have found
amounts to bad faith. Consequently, Appellants' motion for
sanctions under Section 1927 and this Court's inherent power is
denied.

The factual allegations and arguments undergirding Appellants' Rule
9011 Motion are substantially and materially identical to the
Section 1927 Motion. Indeed, the basis for Appellants' Section 1927
Motion and Rule 9011 Motion is the Debtors' response letter to
Appellants' order to show cause.

Appellants argue that Debtors submitted false information in
response to the order to show cause, which disturbed the
administration of case management and the fair and just resolution
of this case due to the misconduct of the Appelle[s and their
counsels. Thus, both motions complain of the same conduct and seek
the same relief, with the only difference being that one was
brought under Section 1927 and the other under Bankruptcy Rule
9011. The Court finds that the Debtors' statements have factual
basis, and that finding equally applies in this case. Therefore,
Appellants' 9011 motion is denied as sanctions are not warranted,
the Court holds.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=gIMbB9 from PacerMonitor.com.

          About Clean Air Car Service and Operr Plaza

Clean Air Car Service & Parking Branch Two, LLC, and Operr Plaza,
LLC filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead
Case No. 23-41937) on May 31, 2023.

At the time of filing, Clean Air Car Service reported $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities
while Operr Plaza reported $10 million to $50 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Nancy Hershey Lord oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Westerman Ball Ederer Miller Zucker &
Sharfstein, LLP, as bankruptcy counsel.


CLOUTER CREEK: Hires Burr & Forman LLP as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Clouter Creek Reserve, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of South Carolina to employ Burr & Forman,
LLP as special counsel.

The Debtor needs the firm's legal assistance to negotiate the
recognition and acceptance of Clement's Ferry Road by Berkeley
County without necessitating litigation between the Debtor's Estate
and the County.

The firm will receive a flat contingency fee for compensation. For
success in the acquisition of the requisite government approval
from Berkeley County for certain aspects of the real property
development, the firm would be paid $100,000.

Randolph R. Lowell, Esq., a partner at Burr & Forman, LLP,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Randolph R. Lowell, Esq.
     Burr & Forman, LLP
     115 Fairchild Street Suite 200
     Charleston, SC 29492
     Tel: (843) 972-6177
     Email: randy@burr.com

              About Clouter Creek Reserve, LLC

Clouter Creek Reserve LLC formerly known as IVO SANDS, LLC, is a
single asset real estate entity based in Charleston, South
Carolina.

Clouter Creek Reserve LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 25-00034) on January
6, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities between $1
million and $10 million.

Penn Law Firm LLC represents the Debtor as counsel.


CLOUTER CREEK: Hires Lempesis Law Firm as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Clouter Creek Reserve, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of South Carolina to employ Lempesis Law
Firm, LLC as special counsel.

The Debtor needs the firm's legal assistance to pursue an objection
to the extent, validity, and priority of the claims held by Mark A.
Mason, who served as counsel to the Debtor, later became a secured
creditor and seek recovery for apparent misconduct related to such
representation.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

Christopher W. Lempesis, Jr.    $500 per hour
Jessica Pierce                  $175 per hour

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Christopher W. Lempesis, Jr., Esq., a partner at Lempesis Law Firm,
LLC, disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Christopher W. Lempesis, Jr., Esq.
     Lempesis Law Firm, LLC
     73 Sea Island Parkway, Unit 16
     Beaufort, SC 29907
     Tel: (843) 379-9356

              About Clouter Creek Reserve, LLC

Clouter Creek Reserve LLC formerly known as IVO SANDS, LLC, is a
single asset real estate entity based in Charleston, South
Carolina.

Clouter Creek Reserve LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 25-00034) on January
6, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities between $1
million and $10 million.

Penn Law Firm LLC represents the Debtor as counsel.


COMMERCIAL FURNITURE: Hires Blankenship CPA Group as Tax Preparer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Commercial Furniture Services, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to employ
Blankenship CPA Group, PLLC as tax preparer.

The firm will assist the Debtor in preparing, reviewing, and filing
the Debtor's 2024 federal and state income tax returns.

The firm will be paid a fixed sum of $4,000 for the services.

Joseph D. Proctor, a partner at Blankenship CPA Group, PLLC,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Joseph D. Proctor
     Blankenship CPA Group, PLLC
     101 Winners Circle
     Brentwood, TN 37027
     Tel: (615) 373-3771
     Fax: (615) 377-4915

              About Commercial Furniture Services, LLC

Commercial Furniture Services, LLC, a company in Chattanooga,
Tenn., offers office furniture installation, asset management (safe
storage) and logistics services.

Commercial Furniture Services filed a petition under Chapter 11,
Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No.
24-12642) on Oct. 18, 2024, with $100,001 to $500,000 in assets and
$1 million to $10 million in liabilities. Brenda Brooks of Moore &
Brooks serves as Subchapter V trustee.

Judge Nicholas W. Whittenburg oversees the case.

Wright, Cortesi & Gilbreath serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


COOL SPRINGS: ECI Wins Summary Judgment in Wingspire Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mary F. Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware will grant E-Crane International USA Inc.'s
motion for summary judgment in the case captioned as WINGSPIRE
EQUIPMENT FINANCE LLC, Plaintiff v. E-CRANE INTERNATIONAL USA INC.,
Defendant, Adv. Pro. No. 23-50395-MFW (Bankr. D. Del.). Wingspire
Equipment Finance LLC f/k/a Liberty Commercial Finance LLC's motion
for summary judgment is denied.

Metal Services LLC (the "Debtor") provided services to global steel
companies, including the processing and removal of molten slag and
metal scrap. To do so, the Debtor purchased, or leased, large
pieces of machinery and equipment. On June 23, 2020, Wingspire and
the Debtor entered into a Master Lease pursuant to which Wingspire
agreed to finance the manufacturing of certain equipment that the
Debtor purchased.

In October 2021 and February 2022, the Debtor circulated requests
for proposals for the construction of two cranes to be used by the
Debtor at the Nucor Steel Gallatin LLC site. The Debtor
subsequently accepted ECI's proposals for construction of the
cranes per the Debtor's specifications.  Pursuant to Purchase
Orders it issued to ECI, the Debtor agreed to pay, according to
Progress Payment Schedules, a total of $1,807,300 for the
construction of Crane 1 and $1,466,500 for the construction of
Crane 2. Wingspire agreed to provide funding for the purchase of
the Cranes under Schedule Nos. 18 and 26 to the Master Lease. The
Debtor and Wingspire advised ECI of Wingspire's agreement to
finance the Cranes and arranged for ECI to bill Wingspire directly
for the Progress Payments.

On Sept. 27, 2022, the Debtor and several of its affiliates filed
cases under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  As of the Petition
Date, Wingspire had paid ECI the first two scheduled Progress
Payments (a total of $1,084,380) for Crane 1 and the first Progress
Payment ($439,950) for Crane 2.

Wingspire filed an adversary proceeding against ECI seeking:

   (1) damages for breach of contract;
   (2) restitution for ECI's retention of Crane 1 and the Deposits
paid for the construction of the Cranes; and
   (3) a constructive trust in Wingspire's favor on the Deposits it
paid for Crane 2.

ECI filed a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, which
Wingspire opposed. By Opinion and Order dated Feb. 1, 2024, the
Court granted the Motion to Dismiss Counts 2, 3 and 4 of the
Amended Complaint. However, the Court denied the Motion to Dismiss
Count 1 because it found that Wingspire had alleged the parties had
a written agreement which ECI had breached and that there was a
genuine issue of material fact on the intent of the parties and the
effect of the documents.

On Dec. 17, 2024, ECI filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on the
remaining Count of the Amended Complaint. Wingspire opposed ECI's
Motion and filed its own Motion for Summary Judgment.

Wingspire contends that it has an express enforceable contract with
ECI to pay ECI in exchange for all right, title, and interest in
the Cranes. It asserts that this contract is
separate from ECI's contract to sell the Cranes to the Debtor and
is evidenced by (i) invoices, emails, and other documentation
between ECI, as Seller, and Wingspire, as Buyer, (ii) the Progress
Payments made by Wingspire and accepted by ECI for the Cranes, and
(iii) the other conduct of the parties. Wingspire argues that a
contract for the sale of goods, like the Cranes, can be formed
through the communications and conduct of the parties which
demonstrates the existence of such a contract.

ECI responds that a contract for the sale of goods over $500
requires a written agreement signed by the party to be charged. It
asserts that the documents on which Wingspire relies were not
signed by ECI and thus do not satisfy that requirement.

The Court concludes that the parties' conduct may provide evidence
of a meeting of the minds necessary to establish the existence of a
contract. As the plaintiff, Wingspire has the
burden of proving that the parties intended to enter into an
agreement for the sale of the Cranes from ECI to Wingspire and for
the return of Wingspire's payments if the Cranes were not completed
and delivered, as it alleges in Count 1 of the Amended Complaint.

The Court agrees with ECI that the Master Lease between the Debtor
and Wingspire cannot establish that a contract existed between ECI
and Wingspire. The Master Lease is an agreement only between
Wingspire and the Debtor. According to the Court, it provides no
evidence that ECI intended to enter into a contract giving
Wingspire any interest in the Cranes or any right to a refund of
the Progress Payments it made on the Debtor's behalf. Further,
Wingspire produced no documents demonstrating that ECI agreed to
any assignment of the Cranes' contracts to Wingspire (or even any
documents advising ECI of an assignment).

Even if ECI had agreed to an assignment, there is no evidence that
ECI agreed to change the terms of its agreement with the Debtor,
the Court finds. Under that agreement, ECI retained title to the
Cranes until it was paid in full, which never happened. Further,
Wingspire cites no support, in the Master Lease or the Debtor's
agreement to purchase the Cranes, demonstrating that it is entitled
to a return of the Progress Payments, the Court adds.

The Court emphasizes that the parties' actions are evidence only of
an agreement by Wingspire to pay ECI for the Crane on the Debtor's
behalf.  Because there was no mutual assent or meeting of the
minds, there is no enforceable contract for a sale of the Cranes by
ECI to Wingspire. As a result, the Court concludes that Wingspire's
claim for breach of contract has no basis.

Because the Court concludes that Wingspire has failed to sustain
its burden of establishing that a contract for the sale of the
Cranes existed between it and ECI, the Court will grant ECI's
Motion for Summary Judgment and deny Wingspire's Motion for Summary
Judgment.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Ez36yI from PacerMonitor.com.

Cool Springs LLC and its debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 22–10912) on Sept. 27, 2022.


CRICKET AUTOMOTIVE: Gets Extension to Access Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
Cricket Automotive Center, LLC received another extension from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina to
use cash collateral.

The fifth interim order authorized the company to use cash
collateral consistent with its budget, with a 10% variance allowed.
The budget shows total projected expenses of $114,913 for April.

Secured creditors, including Cricket Service Center, LLC, a North
Carolina limited liability company, CT Corporation System and
Corporation Service Company, will receive a replacement lien on the
company's post-petition property that is similar to their
pre-bankruptcy collateral.

In addition, the company was ordered to pay $2,000 to Cricket
Service Center and make lease payments to Texaco Since 1949, LLC
and Rollback at Ward, LLC.

Cricket Automotive Center was also ordered to keep the secured
creditors' collateral insured.

The next hearing is scheduled for April 23.

                  About Cricket Automotive Center

Cricket Automotive Center, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 24-04172) on
December 2, 2024, with $100,001 to $500,000 in assets and $500,001
to $1 million in liabilities.

Judge David M. Warren presides over the case.

William P. Janvier, Esq., at Stevens Martin Vaughn & Tadych, PLLC
is the Debtor's legal counsel.

Secured creditor Cricket Service Center, LLC is represented by:

   Brian R. Anderson, Esq.
   Fox Rothschild LLP
   230 N. Elm Street, Suite 1200
   Greensboro, NC 27401
   Telephone: (336) 378-5205
   Facsimile: (336) 378-5400
   Email: Branderson@foxrothschild.com


CUMULUS MEDIA: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa3, Outlook Remains Negative
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings downgraded Cumulus Media New Holdings Inc.'s
(Cumulus) Corporate Family Rating to Caa3 from Caa1, and
Probability of Default Rating to Caa2-PD from Caa1-PD. Also,
Moody's downgraded the ratings on the backed senior secured first
lien notes due July 2029 and senior secured first lien term loan B
due May 2029 to Caa3 from Caa1, and the ratings on the senior
unsecured notes due July 2026 and senior unsecured term loan B due
March 2026 to Ca from Caa3. The Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating
(SGL) remains unchanged at SGL-3. The outlook remains negative.

The downgrade of the CFR reflects Cumulus' weaker-than-expected
operating performance which resulted in very high financial
leverage, a deteriorating liquidity profile and uncertainty
regarding the sustainability of its capital structure.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Cumulus' Caa3 CFR reflects high financial leverage, deteriorating
liquidity, and ongoing secular pressures in broadcast radio. Though
the company benefited in 2024 from political advertising and
double-digit growth in the digital marketing services segment, the
national channel (excluding political), which accounts for
approximately 40% of total revenue, continued to experience
pressures as advertisers increasingly prioritize performance-based
advertising strategies. Additionally, podcasting revenue was
pressured by the loss of clients. Moody's adjusted debt to EBITDA
(including Moody's standard lease adjustments and failed
sale-leaseback) increased to 10.4x in 2024 from 9.0x in 2023.
Excluding one-off expenses related to the debt exchange in Q2 2024,
adjusted financial leverage was 8.8x in 2024. Moody's expects
leverage to remain in the low 10x range in 2025 as political ad
dollars taper off, secular pressures in the traditional radio
segment continue, and podcast revenue decline due to a $15 million
revenue impact from the loss of clients. This will be partially
offset by growth in the digital marketing services segment and cost
reduction initiatives. Moody's projects revenue to decline in the
mid-single digits and adjusted EBITDA margin (including Moody's
standard lease adjustments) to remain in the low 10%.

The SGL-3 rating reflects Moody's expectations that Cumulus will
maintain adequate liquidity over the next 12 months with ABL
availability and cash balances providing some cushion over Moody's
expectations for negative free cash flow and other cash needs.
Cumulus has a $125 million ABL revolving credit facility, with $4.5
million in letters of credit outstanding as of 2024. The borrowing
base may fluctuate as it is based on 85% of account receivable,
excluding customary reserves. Moody's expects that the company will
need to rely on the ABL facility to manage upcoming maturities of
$22.7 million in Q3 2026.

The ABL credit facility contains a springing fixed charge coverage
covenant of at least 1x if average excess availability is less than
the greater of $10 million or 12.5% of the total commitments. The
term loan and senior secured notes are covenant lite.

The Caa3 ratings on the senior secured term loan due May 2029 and
senior secured notes due July 2029 are in line with the Caa3 CFR
given that secured debt represents the preponderance of the capital
structure. The secured debt is subordinated to the $125 million ABL
revolver (unrated) with respect to the accounts receivable that
secure the ABL. The Ca rating on the senior unsecured term loan due
March 2026 and senior unsecured notes due July 2026 are one notch
below the CFR due to the subordination and significant amount of
secured debt ahead of it in the debt structure. Instrument ratings
reflect the probability of default of the company, as reflected in
the Caa2-PD PDR, and Moody's expectations for below average
recovery in a default scenario.

The negative outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Cumulus'
leverage will remain elevated as operating performance remains
challenged by the weak ad environment and ongoing secular headwinds
facing the radio industry.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if Cumulus achieves positive organic
revenue and EBITDA growth on a sustained basis driven by expansion
in its digital businesses and improves liquidity such that
sustainability of the capital structure improves.

The ratings could be downgraded if Cumulus' operating performance
is pressured such that the liquidity position deteriorates further
or Moody's assessments of the probability of default were to
increase.

Cumulus Media New Holdings Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, GA, is
the third largest radio broadcaster in the US with 400 stations in
84 markets, a nationwide network serving more than 9,800 broadcast
affiliates, and numerous digital channels. In addition, Cumulus has
several digital businesses (including podcasting, streaming, and
marketing services), and live events. Cumulus emerged from Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection in June 2018. The company reported $827
million in net revenue for the last twelve months ending December
2024.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Media published
in June 2021.


D2 GOVERNMENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: D2 Government Solutions, Inc.
        820 Aviation Drive
        New Bern, NC 28562

Business Description: D2 Government Solutions, Inc., founded in
                      2010, is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned
                      Small Business (SDVOSB) that provides a
                      broad spectrum of professional services to
                      U.S. government agencies.  The Company
                      specializes in aviation-related operations
                      including base and flight operations,
                      aircraft maintenance, logistical support,
                      aerial imaging, and range services.  In
                      addition, D2 offers administrative and
                      facility support services such as mailroom
                      operations, military transition assistance,
                      ID processing support, clerical staffing,
                      and medical administrative functions,
                      reflecting its versatility in meeting
                      diverse federal contracting needs.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of North Carolina

Case No.: 25-01322

Judge: Hon. Pamela W. McAfee

Debtor's Counsel: JM Cook, Esq.
                  J.M. COOK, P.A.
                  5886 Farington Place, Suite 100
                  Raleigh NC 27609
                  Tel: 919-675-2411
                  E-mail: j.m.cook@jmcookesq.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Darryl Centanni as president.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/7D3G6II/D2_Government_Solutions_Inc__ncebke-25-01322__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

    Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount

1. David Ricker                    Shareholder Loans      $450,000
3190 Nob Hill St
Conway, AR, 72034

2. Sony Dolder                                            $350,000
301 S Front St
Ste 5
New Bern, NC, 28560

3. R2 Government Services               Business           $77,957
113 Ridgewood TR                       Obligation
New Bern, NC, 28560

4. IAMAW                                Business           $49,000
331A West Main St                      Obligation
Havelock, NC, 28532

5. Metlife                              Insurance          $48,515
1929 Allen Parkway
Houston, TX, 77019

6. Cranfill Sumner LLP               Attorney's Fees       $43,015
5440 Wade Park Boulevard
#300
Raleigh, NC, 27607

7. Darryl Centanni                     Shareholder         $37,000
70 W Mirror Ridge Circle                  Loans
Spring, TX, 77382

8. Strategos Consulting                  Business          $36,523
37 Bridgetown Bend                      Obligation
Coronado, CA, 92118

9. American Express                    Credit Card         $35,000
PO Box 6031                                Debt
Carol Stream, IL, 60197

10. Mastercard WF                     Credit Card          $30,000
PO Box 29482                             Debt
Phoenix, AZ, 85038

11. Blue Cross of MS                    Medical            $28,200
3545 Lakeland Drive                    Insurance
Flowwood, MS, 39232

12. Everest Indemnity Insurance        Insurance           $22,335
477 Martinsville Rd                     Coverage
Liberty Corner, NJ, 7938

13. ATSCC                            Business Debt         $19,500
PO Box 56319
Virginia Beach, VA, 23456

14. Titan Aircraft Insurance           Insurance           $18,580
PO Box 930174
Atlanta, GA, 31193

15. Ricky Hawkins                                          $10,600
190 NC Highway 41 W
Trenton, NC, 28585

16. Costal Carolina Airport            Business             $7,900
200 Terminal Drive                    Obligation
New Bern, NC, 28562

17. Premium Finance Solutions        Monies Loaned/         $6,794

PO Box 7648                             Advanced
Columbus, MS, 39705

18. Cintas Corp                         Business            $4,962
PO Box 630803                          Obligation
Cincinnati, OH, 45263

19. Dobert, Nicholas                Wages, Salaries,            $0
314 Lakemere Drive                    Commissions
New Bern, NC, 28562

20. Wichern, Eric                   Wages, Salaries,            $0
4410 Stagecoach Rd                    Commissions
Killeen, TX, 76542


DOUBLE HELIX: Hires Foster Garvey PC as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Double Helix Corporation d/b/a KDHX Community Media seeks approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
to employ Foster Garvey PC as special counsel.

The Debtor needs the firm's legal assistance with the Federal
Communications Commission Regulatory issues surrounding the
transfer of Debtor's license pursuant to a potential sale
agreement.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Attorneys        $761 per hour
     Associates       $375 per hour
     Paralegals       $325 per hour

The firm is owed $18,961 from prepetition work performed related to
the potential transfer of Debtor's FCC license.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Brad Deutsch, Esq., a partner at Foster Garvey PC, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Brad Deutsch, Esq.
     Foster Garvey PC
     3000 K Street, NW Suite 420
     Tel: (202) 298-1793
     Fax: (202) 965-1729
     Email: brad.deutsch@foster.com

              About Double Helix Corporation
                d/b/a KDHX Community Media

Double Helix Corporation, doing business as KDHX Community Media,
is a nonprofit organization based in St. Louis, Missouri, that
operates an independent, non-commercial radio station at 88.1 FM.
The station offers a wide variety of programming, including music,
as well as public affairs shows and educational content. In
addition to its radio broadcasts, KDHX engages with the local
community through events, educational programs, and support for
independent artists.

Double Helix Corporation sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Miss. Case No. 25-40745) on March 10,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Bonnie L. Clair handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Robert Eggmann, Esq., at CARMODY
MACDONALD P.C., in Saint Louis, Missouri.


E.W. SCRIPPS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'SD' on Debt Restructuring
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on The E.W.
Scripps Co. to 'SD' from 'CC'. S&P also lowered its issue-level
ratings on Scripps' senior secured term loan B3 to 'D' from 'CC'.

The E.W. Scripps Co. has completed a debt restructuring in which it
exchanged its existing senior secured term loan B2 due 2026 for a
new senior secured term loan B2 due 2028 and exchanged its senior
secured term loan B3 due 2028 for a new senior secured term loan B3
due 2029.

S&P said, "We view the debt restructuring as distressed and the
exchange of the term loan B3 as tantamount to a default. E.W.
Scripps exchanged its existing $543 million term loan B3 due 2028
for a new $340.2 million secured term loan B3 due 2029 (less $200
million that was rolled over into a new term loan B2, with the
remainder repaid in cash). In our view, lenders received less than
originally promised because the maturity of the term loan B3 was
extended. While the interest rate on the new term loan B3 is 35
basis points (bps) higher than the existing term loan B3 interest
rate (SOFR + 300), we believe this rate is well below what the
company would be required to pay for new capital under current
market conditions and what an issuer with a similar risk profile
would have to pay to raise new capital.

"We also view the transaction as distressed because, absent a
transaction, we believe there was a realistic possibility of a
conventional default within the next several quarters. Scripps
ended 2024 with leverage (calculated on an average
trailing-eight-quarters basis to balance the financial benefit of
political advertising revenue in election years) of about 6.9x, and
we believe the company has limited ability to deleverage ahead of
sizable upcoming maturities given secular pressures facing linear
television."

The company also exchanged $110.8 million of its existing $721
million term loan B2 due 2026 for a new senior secured term loan B2
due 2028. No existing term loan B2 remains outstanding because the
company used proceeds from its new $450 million accounts receivable
securitization facility and $223.5 million in new money from
certain B2 lenders, as well as cash on hand (including from
drawings under its revolving credit facilities), to repay the
non-exchanged portion of the debt.

S&P said, "While we believe lenders of the existing term loan B2
received less than originally promised due to the maturity
extension, we believe lenders received adequate offsetting
compensation. The spread on the term loan B2 increased to 575 bps
from 256 bps, which is roughly equal to its current market yield."

At the same time, the company replaced its existing $585 million
revolving credit facility with a new revolving credit facility with
aggregate commitments of up to $208 million due July 2027 and
another new non-extended revolving credit facility with aggregate
commitments of up to $70 million due January 2026.

S&P said, "We plan to reassess all our ratings on the company in
the coming days. We will most likely raise our issuer credit rating
on Scripps to 'CCC+'. While the proposed transaction extended the
company's debt maturity profile, the company still has $426 million
of senior unsecured notes due in 2027 (with annual maturities
thereafter through 2029 and 2031), and the terms of the new debt
include a springing maturity to 2027 if $50 million of the 2027
notes remain outstanding. In addition, the terms of the new debt
include limitations on using cash or availability under its
revolving credit facilities to repay the notes due 2027. We also
believe the company's growing preferred stock balance, due to the
accruing of paid-in-kind dividends, further limits the company's
ability to deleverage, as we include it in our calculation of
adjusted debt. The company has been pursuing asset sales to aid in
debt reduction, but we believe any future proceeds will not
significantly reduce the company's $2.6 billion debt burden."



ECS BRANDS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: ECS Brands, Ltd.
        295 Interlocken Blvd., Suite 500
        Broomfield, CO 80021

Business Description: ECS Brands, Ltd. is a privately held company
                      specializing in hemp-derived products.
                      Founded in 2018, ECS Brands focuses on
                      manufacturing and supplying bulk hemp
                      extracts, white-label products, and
                      innovative formulations such as water-
                      soluble nano emulsions.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 25-12101

Judge: Hon. Thomas B Mcnamara

Debtor's Counsel: Jenny M.F. Fujii, Esq.
                  KUTNER BRINEN DICKEY RILEY PC
                  1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1720
                  Denver, CO 80264
                  Tel: 303-832-2400
                  E-mail: jmf@kutnerlaw.com       

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Arthur Jaffee as manager.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free on PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/EF2223Y/ECS_Brands_Ltd__cobke-25-12101__0002.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/HY4LLVY/ECS_Brands_Ltd__cobke-25-12101__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ELECTRO SALES: Mr. W Lease Contract Void Not Voidable, Court Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael M. Parker of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Texas granted Mr. W Fireworks, Inc.'s
motion for reconsideration in the case captioned as MR. W
FIREWORKS, INC., PLAINTIFF, V. 2317 PINN ROAD INVESTMENT INC.,
SHEBILO MANAGEMENT, INC. & ELECTRO SALES & SERVICE, INC.,
DEFENDANTS, ADVERSARY NO. 22-05045-MMP (Bankr. W.D. Tex.) with
respect to the lease and sales contracts between Electro Sales,
Inc. and Mr. W Fireworks, Inc. concerning a property in 2750 S.
Loop 1604, San Antonio, Texas. Pinn Road Investment Inc. and
Shebilo Management Inc.'s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Mr. W Fireworks, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment is denied.

Mr. W contends the Court's Order and Opinion is an interlocutory
order and can therefore be revised under Rule 54(b).

The Court's Order and Opinion found Mr. W's lease contract was
executed outside Electro's ordinary course of business, and
therefore void or voidable. From there, the Court's Sec. 549
discussion mainly addressed the Mr. W Sales Contract, stating Mr. W
(i) was not a good faith purchaser because it was on notice of
Electro's bankruptcy prior to the proposed closing date, and (ii)
failed to meet its evidentiary burden as to its perfection
requirement. But in that same Sec. 549 discussion, only once did
the Court's Order and Opinion explicitly mention the Mr. W Lease
Contract. Because the Court's Order and Opinion did not explicitly
resolve Mr. W's defense under Sec. 549 as to the Mr. W Lease
Contract, it is an interlocutory order. Thus, this Court will grant
Mr. W's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Order and Opinion.

While enjoying the benefits of the bankruptcy stay and keeping
Electro's creditors at bay, Electro's principal is alleged to have,
for his own personal gain and outside the view of Electro's
creditors, leased Electro's property (and granted substantial other
rights) outside Electro's ordinary course of business and without
first seeking the Court's approval. The bankruptcy stay, which
focuses mainly on the actions of creditors, did not prevent this
lease transaction. Despite having fiduciary duties to the estate
and its creditors as a DIP, Electro's principal had an incentive to
enter the undisclosed lease transaction as it was lucrative for him
personally. Indeed, scenarios where a DIP's principal, who is
personally benefiting from a transaction, would want to avoid their
own unauthorized transfer (on behalf of the DIP and in recognition
of its duties to the estate) would be rare.

Because the Court lacks the authority to retroactively annul or
approve a Sec. 363(b) action and because of the inherent
consequences of concluding otherwise, the Court concludes Sec.
363(b) violations are void, not voidable. Because the Mr. W Lease
Contract was outside Electro's ordinary course of business, in
violation of Sec. 363(b), the Mr. W Lease Contract is void. Because
the Mr. W Lease Contract is void, it is incurable and no property
interest was ever transferred to Mr. W. Because the Mr. W Lease
contract is incurable, Sec. 549(a)'s avoidance power is
unnecessary. And since Sec. 549(a) does not apply and since no
interest was ever transferred to Mr. W, the Court need not consider
Mr. W's Sec. 549(c) exception arguments.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=CCSH1h from PacerMonitor.com.

                  About Electro Sales & Service

Electro Sales & Service filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
21-50546) on May 3, 2021.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
disclosed $500,001 to $1 million in assets and $100,001 to $500,000
in liabilities.  Judge Ronald B. King oversaw the case.  David T.
Cain, Esq., was the Debtor's legal counsel.

The case was converted to Chapter 7.



ELEGANZA TILES: Hires Curd Galindo & Smith LLP as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Eleganza Tiles, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California to employ Curd, Galindo &
Smith LLP as counsel.

The firm's services include:

     a. giving the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers
and duties and the continued operation of its business and
management of its property;

     b. preparing legal papers;

     c. preparing and timely submitting a Subchapter V plan of
reorganization to creditors and the court;

     d. assisting the Debtor as necessary in complying with the
guidelines set by the Office of the U.S. Trustee;

     e. assisting in the prosecution of adverse actions, claims
objections or contested matters, which may be necessary or
ancillary proceedings to the bankruptcy; and

     f. performing other necessary legal services.

Curd Galindo & Smith's hourly rates are:

     Jeffrey Smith         $600 per hour
     Partners              $450 per hour
     Associates            $275 per hour
     Paralegals            $125 per hour

The firm will receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses
incurred. The retainer fee is $35,000.

Jeffrey Smith, Esq., a partner at Curd Galindo & Smith, disclosed
in a court filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Jeffrey B. Smith, Esq.
     Curd Galindo & Smith, LLP
     301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 1700
     Long Beach, CA 90802
     Tel: (562) 624-1177
     Fax: (562) 624-1178
     Email: jsmith@cgsattys.com

              About Eleganza Tiles, Inc.

Eleganza Tiles Inc. is a distributor of ceramic, porcelain, and
glass tiles throughout North America, catering to both residential
and commercial markets. The Company's diverse offerings encompass
European cabinetry, luxurious bathroom fixtures, and innovative
countertops, designed to inspire and meet the needs of designers,
architects, builders, and homeowners.

Eleganza Tiles Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 25-10535) on March 2,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets between
$500,000 and $1 million and estimated liabilities between $1
million and $10 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Scott C. Clarkson handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Jeffrey B. Smith, Esq., at Curd,
Galindo & Smith, LLP.


ENDO INT'L: PI Claimant Loses Bid to Modify Chapter 11 Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable James L. Garrity of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York denied the motion of
Charles Elliot Anderson seeking an order modifying Endo
International plc and its debtor affiliates' fourth amended plan
and granting him certain "equitable relief".

On August 16, 2022, Endo and seventy-five of its affiliated Debtors
each commenced voluntary chapter 11 cases in this Court by filing a
petition for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United
States Code. On May 25, 2023, and May 31, 2023, certain additional
Debtors also commenced Chapter 11 Cases by filing petitions for
relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The chapter 11
cases are being jointly administered.

Mr. Anderson is a self-described "surviving victim" and personal
injury claimant in these chapter 11 cases.

Under the Plan, Patrick J. Bartels is the Plan Administrator of the
remaining debtors in these chapter 11 cases. He filed an objection
to the Motion. Edgar C. Gentle, III is the trustee of the Endo
Opioid Personal Injury Trust formed under the Plan.

On May 6, 2024, the PI Trust received Mr. Anderson's personal
injury claim submission. Upon review, the PI Trust determined that
Mr. Anderson's personal injury claim submission complies with all
requirements set forth in the Endo PI Trust Distribution Procedures
and is therefore compensable under the PI TDP framework. On Dec.
13, 2024, the PI Trust confirmed over email that Mr. Anderson has
an Allowed PI Opioid Claim under the PI TDP. Specifically, Mr.
Anderson holds an allowed Class 7A-PI Opioid Claim under the Plan
channeled to the PI Trust under the Plan.

In the Motion, Mr. Anderson seeks to modify the Fourth Amended Plan
to establish a new "Surviving Victims" trust that would monetize
and distribute certain assets of the Debtors (including litigation
claims) to pay, in full, his claims, and the claims of similarly
situated claimants. Specifically, he seeks an order of the Court:

   * Allowing and directing payment of his $5 million claim in
full, inclusive of his cure claim.
   * Recognizing his surviving victim status by designating and
recognizing him as a "surviving victim" as "defined within the
meaning of the Plan and applicable law."
   * Establishing a separate, segregated protective trust for the
benefit of all "surviving victims," ensuring that sufficient funds
are available to compensate the "surviving victims" for their
ongoing suffering and to provide for their future needs, including
the generational effect on "surviving victims" kids, including the
payment of cure claims.
   *  Directing Endo PI and its trustee to pay in full his allowed
claim.

In substance, the Plan Administrator contends that Mr. Anderson is
bound by the Fourth Amended Plan and Confirmation Order, and that
there are no avenues for him to challenge or modify the Plan. He
notes that Mr. Anderson did not appeal the Confirmation Order and,
pursuant to rule 8002(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure, is now time-barred from doing so. He also contends that
Mr. Anderson is time-barred from seeking to revoke the Confirmation
Order under section 1144 of the Bankruptcy Code, and that, in any
event, he has put forth no sufficient basis to revoke the order,
and none exists. Finally, the Plan  Administrator argues that Mr.
Anderson lacks standing to seek to modify the Plan under section
1127(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, and moreover, that he is barred
from doing so because the Plan has been substantially consummated.


The Court finds Mr. Anderson is not entitled to the relief he is
seeking in the Motion.

Pursuant to section 1141(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a confirmed
plan is a contract binding on all creditors whether they voted for
or against the Plan. Mr. Anderson voted to reject the Plan.
Nonetheless, he is bound by the Plan.

Still, in the Motion, in part, Mr. Anderson purports to object to
the treatment of his claim under the Plan. By its terms, on the
Effective Date, the Plan became binding on all parties, including
all holders of claims. In the Confirmation Order, the Court found
that the Plan meets the standards set forth in section 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code. Any objections to Plan confirmation were
"overruled on the merits with prejudice."

The Confirmation Order is a final, non-appealable order.
Nonetheless, Mr. Anderson seeks to assert objections to the Plan
that he could have raised prior to Plan confirmation. However, he
is barred from doing so.

Judge Garrity concludes that Mr. Anderson is not a Plan proponent.
As such, he lacks standing and is not eligible to seek to modify
the Plan. In any event, he cannot state grounds for relief under
section 1127(b) because it is undisputed that the Fourth Amended
Plan has been substantially consummated. Nor may Mr. Anderson
revoke the Confirmation Order.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=YksNNT from PacerMonitor.com.

                  About Endo International PLC

Endo International plc (OTC: ENDPQ) is a generics and branded
pharmaceutical company. It develops, manufactures, and sells
branded and generic products to customers in a wide range of
medical fields, including endocrinology, orthopedics, urology,
oncology, neurology, and other specialty areas. On the Web:
http://www.endo.com/      

Endo International and certain of its subsidiaries initiated
voluntary prearranged Chapter 11 proceedings (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead
Case No. 22-22549) on Aug. 16, 2022.

On May 25, 2023, Operand Pharmaceuticals Holdco II Limited and
Operand Pharmaceuticals Holdco III Limited each filed a voluntary
Chapter 11 petition also in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York. On May 31, 2023, Operand
Pharmaceuticals II Limited and Operand Pharmaceutical III Limited
each filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition also in the Southern
District of New York.

The Company's cases are jointly administered before the Honorable
James L. Garrity, Jr.

Endo initiated the financial restructuring process after reaching
an agreement with a group of its senior debtholders on a
transaction that would substantially reduce outstanding debt,
address remaining opioid and other litigation-related claims, and
best position Endo for the future. This would allow the Company to
advance its ongoing business transformation from a strengthened
financial position to create compelling value for its stakeholders
over the long term.

Endo's India-based entities are not part of the Chapter 11
proceedings. The Company has filed recognition proceedings in
Canada and expects to file similar proceedings in the United
Kingdom and Australia.

The Debtors tapped Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP as
legal counsel; PJT Partners, LP as investment banker; and Alvarez &
Marsal North America, LLC as financial advisor. Kroll Restructuring
Administration, LLC, is the claims agent and administrative
advisor. A Website dedicated to the restructuring is at
http://www.endotomorrow.com/       

Roger Frankel, the legal representative for future claimants in the
Chapter 11 cases, tapped Frankel Wyron LLP and Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as legal counsels, and Ducera Partners,
LLC, as investment banker.


ENNIS I-45 11: Hires Shannon & Lee LLP as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Ennis I-45 11 Acre, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ Shannon & Lee
LLP as counsel.

Shannon & Lee LLP as bankruptcy counsel to handle its Chapter 11
case.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Kyung S. Lee               $900 per hour
     RJ Shannon                 $700 per hour
     Ella Cornwall              $300 per hour
     Sirron Houston-Washington  $300 per hour
     Legal Assistants           $50 to $100 per hour

The firm will be paid a retainer of $50,000.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Kyung S. Lee, Esq., a partner at Shannon & Lee LLP, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Kyung S. Lee, Esq.
     Robert J. Shannon, Esq.
     Ella A. Cornwall, Esq.
     Shannon & Lee LLP
     2100 Travis Street
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: (713) 714-5770
     Email: klee@shannonleellp.com
            rshannon@shannonleellp.com
            ecornwall@shannonleellp.com

              About Ennis I-45 11 Acre, LLC

Ennis I-45 11 Acre, LLC (dba Ennis Luxury RV Resort) is an upscale
RV park located just outside of Dallas, Texas, in Ennis.

Ennis I-45 sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 25-31219) on April 1, 2025.  In its
petition, the Debtor reported estimated assets of $1 million to $10
million and estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million.  The
petition was signed by John McGaugh as manager.

The Debtor is represented by Shannon & Lee LLP as counsel.


EQUIPSOURCE LLC: Hires Brister Law Firm as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Equipsource, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Arkansas to employ Brister Law Firm PLLC as
counsel to handle its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be paid at the rate of $350 per hour.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

M. Sean Brister, Esq., a partner at Brister Law Firm, PLLC,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     M. Sean Brister, Esq.
     Brister Law Firm, PLLC
     P.O. Box 1451
     Alma, AR 72921
     Tel: (479) 632-2446
     Fax: (479) 632-2447
     Email: sean@bristerlawfirm.com

              About Equipsource, LLC

EquipSource LLC, operating as Lifan Power USA, is a distributor
specializing in small engines, generators, pressure washers, and
related machinery and equipment. The Company focuses on wholesale
trade for both residential and commercial use.

EquipSource LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 25-70367) on March 6,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets between
$1 million and $10 million and estimated liabilities between $1
million and $10 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Bianca M. Rucker handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by M. Sean Brister, Esq. at BRISTER LAW
FIRM.

Cadence Bank, as lender, is represented by:

     Christopher A. McNulty, Esq.
     ROSE LAW FIRM, A Professional Association
     120 East Fourth Street
     Little Rock, AR 72201
     Tel: (501) 375-9131
     Email: cmcnulty@roselawfirm.com


FAIR ANDREEN: Hires Kerkman & Dunn as General Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Fair Andreen, Incorporated seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin to employ Kerkman &
Dunn as general counsel.

The firm will render these services:

     (a) advise and assist the Debtor with respect to its duties
and powers under the Bankruptcy Code;

     (b) advise the Debtor on the conduct of its Chapter 11 case,
including the legal and administrative requirements of operating in
Chapter 11;

     (c) attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of the
creditors and other parties in interest;

     (d) prosecute actions on the behalf of the Debtor, defend
actions commenced against the Debtor, and represent the Debtor's
interests in negotiations concerning litigation in which the Debtor
is involved, including objections to claims filed against the
Debtor's estates;

     (e) prepare pleadings in connection with the Debtor's Chapter
11 case including motions, applications, answers, orders, reports,
and papers necessary or otherwise beneficial to the administration
of the Debtor's estates;

     (f) advise the Debtor in connection with any potential sales
of assets;

     (g) appear before the Court to represent the interests of the
Debtor's estate;

     (h) assist the Debtor in preparing, negotiating and
implementing a plan, and advising with respect to any rejection of
a plan and reformulation of a plan, if necessary;

     (i) assist and advise the Debtor in state court actions
related to judgments and collection actions initiated by or against
the Debtor that are necessary for an effective reorganization; and

     (j) perform all other necessary or appropriate legal services
for the Debtor in connection with the prosecution of their Chapter
11 cases, including (i) analyzing the Debtor's leases and
contracts, and the assumption and assignment or rejection of them,
(ii) analyzing the validity of liens against the Debtor, and (iii)
advising the Debtor on transactional and litigation matters.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Jerome R. Kerkman                 $595 per hour
     Evan P. Schmit                    $515 per hour
     Nicholas W. Kerkman               $315 per hour
     Anjanette G. Seymour              $250 per hour
     Non-Attorney Paraprofessionals    $125 per hour

As disclosed in the court filings, K&D is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of§ 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and as
required by § 327(a), and does not hold or represent an interest
adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jerome R. Kerkman, Esq.
     Kerkman & Dunn
     839 N. Jefferson St., Suite 400
     Milwaukee, WI 53202-3722
     Tel: (414) 277-8200
     Fax: (414) 277-0100
     Email: jkerkman@kerkmandunn.com

             About Fair Andreen, Incorporated

Fair Andreen Inc., doing business as City Press, is a commercial
printing company with facilities in Wisconsin and Illinois.

Fair Andreen Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wis. Case No. 25-21724) on April 2,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.

The Debtor is represented by Jerome R. Kerkman, Esq. at Kerkman &
Dunn.


FASHIONABLE INC: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Tennessee
---------------------------------------------------------
On April 8, 2025, Fashionable Inc. filed Chapter 11 protection in
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.
According to court filing, the Debtor reports $8,736,549  in
debt owed to 100 and 199 creditors. The petition states funds will
be available to unsecured creditors.

           About Fashionable Inc.

Fashionable Inc., doing business as ABLE, is a Nashville-based
women's clothing and accessories brand offering a thoughtfully
curated range of apparel, leather goods, jewelry, and footwear --
all designed to empower and instill confidence in women.

Fashionable Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 25-01501) on April 8,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports total assets of
$1,707,977 and total liabilities of $8,736,549.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Randal S. Mashburn handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by R. Alex Payne, Esq. at DUNHAM
HILDEBRAND PAYNE WALDRON, PLLC.


FERRELLGAS PARTNERS: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CCC+', Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its ratings on Ferrellgas Partners L.P.
to 'CCC+' from 'B'. The outlook remains negative.

S&P said, "We also lowered our issue-level rating on the senior
unsecured notes to 'CCC+' from 'B'. The '3' recovery rating on the
senior notes are unchanged, indicating our expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) recovery in the event
of a payment default."

The negative outlook reflects Ferrellgas' constrained liquidity and
reliance on favorable market conditions to refinance over the next
12 months amid market uncertainty.

As of April 1, 2026, Ferrellgas Partners L.P.'s $650 million senior
unsecured notes are current and we do not expect the partnership to
have sufficient liquidity to address the maturity without
refinancing. Additionally, the partnership's senior secured
revolving credit facility matures Dec. 31 of this year.
As such, S&P believes Ferrellgas is subject to favorable market
conditions to address this upcoming maturity.

The 'CCC+' rating reflects the partnership's elevated refinancing
and default risk due to its current maturities. As of April 1,
2025, Ferrellgas had $650 million in current maturities and the
partnership's revolving credit facility matures Dec. 31 of this
year. S&P said, "Sources of liquidity, including the partnership's
cash balance of around $39 million (as of Jan. 31, 2025) and our
expectation for about $226 million of funds from operations (FFO)
do not sufficiently offset the impact of the approaching
maturities. We believe Ferrellgas is currently dependent upon
favorable financial and economic conditions needed to refinance its
2026 notes. As a result, we revised our liquidity assessment of the
partnership to weak."

A colder winter slightly improved our 2025 EBITDA forecast for
Ferrellgas. The partnership benefited from the frigid January
weather to grow propane volumes sold and EBITDA in the first half
of fiscal year ending July 2025. S&P said, "Consequently, we
revised our fiscal 2025 EBITDA to $350 million–$360 million.
Despite the positive momentum in operating performance, this alone
cannot generate enough free cash flow to satisfy its upcoming
obligations or offset the refinancing risk associated with the
company's short weighted average debt maturity. Our leverage
forecast for 2025 did not decline much, remaining 6.1x-6.4x due to
the inclusion of the remaining Eddystone lawsuit payment ($37.5
million at the end of fiscal 2025) as debt, after Ferrellgas
announced it reached a $125 million settlement related to the
Eddystone litigation, to be paid over three installments. The
company paid $50 million in January 2025, and two $37.5 million
payments are due in June 2025 and January 2026."

The negative outlook reflects Ferrellgas' reliance on favorable
financial and economic conditions to address its current
maturities. S&P expects liquidity to remain constrained until the
2026 notes are addressed.

S&P could lower its rating on Ferrellgas if the partnership does
not launch a refinance of the 2026 notes by the end of May 2025.

S&P could take a positive rating action on Ferrellgas if it
improves its liquidity by launching a refinancing transaction.



FF FUND I: Founder's Motions to Suppress in Fraud Case Denied
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Vernon S. Broderick of the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York denied Andrew Franzone's motions
to suppress in the case captioned as UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v.
ANDREW FRANZONE Defendant, Case No. 21-cr-00446-VSB (S.D.N.Y.),

Defendant Andrew Franzone is charged with one count of securities
fraud and one count of wire fraud in an indictment filed July 8,
2021.

Franzone was the founder and General Partner of an investment fund
called Farrell Franzone Investments LLC, renamed FF Fund I in 2014.
He represented to investors that the fund was invested in highly
liquid preferred securities and options and that the fund was
achieving consistent, positive returns. The Indictment alleges
that, in reality, the fund was engaged in mostly high-risk,
illiquid private investments. Allegedly, Franzone's
misrepresentations and omissions fraudulently induced over $40
million in investments in FF Fund from over 100 investors

On Sept. 24, 2019, FF Fund filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

On April 20, 2021, Magistrate Judge James L. Cott signed a criminal
complaint charging Franzone with securities fraud and wire fraud
and issued an arrest warrant.

On April 22, 2021, law enforcement agents from the United States
Postal Inspection Service arrested Franzone in Fort Lauderdale,
Florida.

On April 28, 2021, FF Fund filed a notice of intent to liquidate
the company.

Before the Court are:

   (1) Franzone's motion to suppress evidence stemming from two
separate seizures that occurred in spring 2021,; and
   (2) Franzone's motion to suppress materials seized from his
Gmail account.

Franzone's motion to suppress the cell phone and laptop seized at
the W Hotel on the day of his arrest is denied.

The Government obtained the First Warrant to seize Franzone's
property from his Westin hotel room, but by the time agents sought
to execute the warrant, Franzone's possessions had
been moved to a different location in the hotel. The Government
contends that Franzone has no standing to challenge the seizure
that subsequently took place, and that the possessions were handed
over with the consent of the Westin, not pursuant to the First
Warrant. Franzone disagrees, arguing that the seizure was overbroad
and the warrant was insufficiently particular and unsupported by
probable cause.

Judge Broderick finds that suppression of the evidence gained from
the seizure at the Westin is not warranted. Therefore, Franzone
motion to suppress evidence from the Westin is denied.

The Government argues that the evidence obtained from the Westin
Hotel was voluntarily given to law enforcement by Westin personnel,
and therefore not obtained pursuant to the First Warrant. Given
that the Westin Director of Security explicitly stated that the
hotel would turn over Franzone's belongings based on law
enforcement presenting them with the First Warrant, there can be no
question that the Government's seizure of Franzone's belongings at
the Westin was for all practical purposes pursuant to the First
Warrant, the Court concludes.

Franzone claims that law enforcement indiscriminately seized all of
his possessions from the Westin, including items like clothes and
toiletries that are not authorized by the First
Warrant, thus unreasonably exceeding the scope of the First
Warrant.  The evidence does not support a finding that the seizure
of items from the Westin exceeded the scope of the authorizing
warrant, the Court finds.

Franzone alleges that the application for the Third Warrant
contained five material misstatements made in reckless disregard
for the truth, necessitating suppression of the Third Warrant. He
further argues that the Third Warrant was fatally overbroad,
providing another, independent basis for suppression. Judge
Broderick finds that the statements were not misstatements
recklessly made and that the Third Warrant was not overbroad.
Therefore, Franzone's motion to suppress evidence from his Gmail
account is denied.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=mdA7QD from PacerMonitor.com.

                           About FF Fund

FF Fund I, L.P., is a limited partnership that was formed in August
2010.  FF Fund's general partner is FF Management.  FF Fund's
offering documents identified a broad range of investment
strategies to achieve its stated objectives of "capital
appreciation and current income."

FF Fund has 13 subsidiaries and affiliates that FF Management set
up and routinely evolved over the roughly 10 years since FF Fund's
formation for various accounting, tax, audit, insurance,
regulatory, liquidity, operational, and administrative reasons.

F3 Real Estate Partners, LLC, was established to invest in real
estate primarily from 2011 through 2019.  Prior to the CRO's
appointment, F3 purchased and then sold a residential complex
containing 87 condominium units in West Palm Beach, FL, which sale
transaction closed in May 2019.

F5 Business Investment Partners, LLC, held and currently owns the
majority of the current investments made by FF Fund with monies
received from the Limited Partners.  The investments made by the F5
consisted mainly of (i) illiquid, non-tradeable privately held
shares in early-stage or start-up companies, (ii) minority
interests in real estate partnerships, or (iii) unsecured
promissory notes.

F6 Standard Securities Partners, LLC, held liquid hedge fund
investments.

The remainder of the subsidiaries had nominal investments.

On Sept. 24, 2019, FF Management retained Soneet R. Kapila to
manage FF Fund.  FF Management was and is controlled by Andrew
Franzone.

FF Fund I L.P., an investment company based in Miami, Fla., filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-22744) on Sept. 24, 2019.  In the
petition signed by CRO Soneet R. Kapila, the Debtor estimated $50
million to $100 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.

On Jan. 24, 2020, F5 Business Investment Partners, LLC, an
affiliate of FF Fund, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 20-10996).  The case is jointly administered with that of
FF Fund.  At the time of the filing, F5 Business estimated assets
of between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of between
$1 million and $10 million.

Chief Judge Laurel M. Isicoff oversees the cases.

Paul J. Battista, Esq., at Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., is
serving as the Debtors' legal counsel.

No creditors' committee has been appointed in the case.  In
addition, no trustee or examiner has been appointed.


FIRESTAR DIAMOND: Court Orders Bhansalis to Produce Tax Returns
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the adversary proceeding captioned as RICHARD LEVIN, trustee for
the liquidating trust of FIRESTAR DIAMOND, INC., Plaintiff, v.
NIRAV MODI and MIHIR BHANSALI, Defendants, Adv. Pro. No.
19-01102-DSJ (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.), the Honorable David S. Jones of the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of  New
York granted the renewed motion of Richard Levin, trustee for the
liquidating trust of Firestar Diamond Inc., to compel production of
Mihir Bhansali and his wife, Rakhi Bhansali's tax returns that are
within their possession, custody, or control.

Mr. Bhansali is alleged to have been a key participant in a massive
fraud which allegedly featured, among other things, the frequent
transfer and concealment of assets to and among
family members. The plaintiff is attempting to identify, trace, and
document relevant assets and asset movements. This adversary
proceeding was filed in 2019 and document discovery is not yet
complete, but the Trustee has been diligently seeking documents for
years, often over opposition. Discovery efforts are ongoing with a
May 1, 2025, deadline for completion of document discovery
currently in place. Particularly because many relevant financial
dealings occurred abroad in jurisdictions where discovery may be
slow and difficult if not impossible, the Trustee now seeks to
compel production of tax returns as part of his effort to
understand and demonstrate asset ownership and transfers that the
Trustee argues were part of the fraudulent scheme at issue.

The Bhansalis oppose, arguing that courts exhibit special
solicitude and require a heightened showing before requiring the
production of tax returns given privacy sensitivities that
uniquely are presented by tax returns. They argue that, at a
minimum, it is premature to require the production of their tax
returns before other efforts at discovery have concluded.

Judge Jones holds, "The records sought are relevant to the issues
of this case. Again, and speaking broadly, the complaint alleges a
massive scheme to fraudulently induce transfers of assets to
participants in the fraud without delivering promised value in
exchange, coupled with elaborate asset transfers and/or concealment
in an attempt to evade detection and/or accountability for the
alleged fraud. The Trustee has established the  relevance of the
requested tax returns of key alleged participants in this scheme.
The information sought is likely to help the Trustee identify who
had ownership of or income derived from what assets at what time."

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=xYMnNz from PacerMonitor.com.

                   About Firestar Diamond

Firestar Diamond Inc. procures, designs, manufactures and
distributes diamond-studded jewelry.  Firestar Diamond's operations
span the USA, Europe, the Middle East, the Far East and India, and
has offices in Mumbai, Surat, New York, Chicago, Johannesburg,
Antwerp, Yerevan, Dubai, and Hong Kong.  It employs over 1,200
people. A. Jaffe, Inc., a subsidiary of Firestar Diamond, designs
and manufactures wedding rings and wedding bands.

Firestar Diamond, A. Jaffe and Fantasy, Inc. sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-10509) on
Feb. 26, 2018. Firestar Diamond estimated assets and debt of $50
million to $100 million.

The Hon. Sean H. Lane is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Ian R. Winters, Esq., at Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP as their bankruptcy counsel;
Forchelli Deegan Terrana LLP as conflicts counsel; Lackenbach
Siegel, LLP as special counsel; Getzler Henrich & Associates LLC
and its managing director Mark Samson as chief restructuring
officer; and Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy as claims and noticing
agent.

Richard Levin, Esq., has been appointed as Chapter 11 trustee for
Firestar Diamond.  The trustee tapped Jenner & Block, LLP as his
legal counsel; Alvarez & Marsal Disputes and Investigations, LLC as
his financial advisor; and Gem Certification & Assurance Lab, Inc.
as his appraiser.

John J. Carney, Esq., has been appointed as examiner in the
Debtors' cases.  Alvarez & Marsal Disputes and Investigations, LLC,
serves as his financial advisor.


FIRST CLASS MOVING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: First Class Moving Systems, Inc.
               d/b/a First Class Companies
               d/b/a First Class Global Logistics
               d/b/a First Class Commercial Interiors
               d/b/a First Class Commercial Services
             5431 Beaumont Center Blvd., #1110
             Tampa, FL 33634

Business Description: First Class Moving Systems, Inc. is a
                      professional moving company offering
                      residential and commercial moving services,
                      as well as packing, logistics, and storage
                      solutions.  The Company has locations in
                      Tampa, Miami/Fort Lauderdale, Gulfport, MS,
                      Orlando, FL, and Bound Brook, NJ.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Six affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                              Case No.
    ------                                              --------
    First Class Moving Systems, Inc.(Lead Case)         25-02243
    Capital Asset Finance, Inc.                         25-02244
    First Class Moving Systems of North Jersey, Inc.    25-02245
    First Class Moving of South Florida, Inc.           25-02246
    First Class Commercial Services of Orlando, Inc.    25-02247
    FC Equipment Leasing, Inc.                          25-02248

Judge: Hon. Roberta A Colton

Debtors' Counsel: Scott A. Stichter, Esq.
                  Amy Denton Mayer, Esq.
                  STICHTER RIEDEL BLAIN & POSTLER, P.A.
                  110 East Madison Street, Suite 200
                  Tampa, Florida 33602
                  Tel: (813) 229-0144
                  E-mail: sstichter@srbp.com
                          amayer@srbp.com

Lead Debtor's
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Lead Debtor's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Christopher J. Hunt signed the petitions in his capacity as vice
president.

A copy of the Lead Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors
is available for free on PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/XDUECYA/First_Class_Moving_Systems_Inc__flmbke-25-02243__0002.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/XGRRV3Y/First_Class_Moving_Systems_Inc__flmbke-25-02243__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/XTWQMIY/Capital_Asset_Finance_Inc__flmbke-25-02244__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/UNUGC3I/First_Class_Moving_Systems_of__flmbke-25-02245__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/7WMW62Y/First_Class_Moving_of_South_Florida__flmbke-25-02246__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/4AG6MQA/First_Class_Commercial_Services__flmbke-25-02247__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/A4TN3LA/FC_Equipment_Leasing_Inc__flmbke-25-02248__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


FORTUNA AUCTION: Court Stays FLSA Suit as to Herbert John Saxon
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gregory H. Woods of the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York stayed the case captioned as ANISSA
CARROLL, Plaintiff, -v – FORTUNA AUCTION LLC; and HERBERT JOHN
SAXON, Defendants, Case No. 1:23-cv-07410-GHW (S.D.N.Y.) as to
Herbert John Saxon.

Plaintiff commenced this action on Aug. 21, 2023, alleging that
Defendants violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. Secs.
201 et seq. and the New York Labor Law Secs. 191, 193. On April 2,
2025, Defendant Fortuna Auction LLC filed a suggestion of
bankruptcy, notifying the Court that it had filed a bankruptcy
petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 1, 2025.


Under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362(a), Fortuna's bankruptcy petition
automatically operates as a stay of this action as against Fortuna.
Because the Court finds that continuing the litigation of
Plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendant in this case,
Herbert John Saxon, will have immediate adverse economic
consequences on Fortuna, this case is stayed as to him as well.

Judge Woods explains that trying the action against Mr. Saxon is
sufficiently likely to have a material effect on Fortuna's
bankruptcy estate to warrant an extension of the automatic stay at
this time. Plaintiff asserts five of her six claims against both
Mr. Saxon and Fortuna, seeking to hold them jointly and severally
liable. Because Fortuna may be jointly and severally liable for
Plaintiff's claims, the litigation of claims asserted against Mr.
Saxon will have an immediate adverse economic consequence for the
debtor's estate. That is because, as currently contemplated, a
favorable resolution of Plaintiff's claims against Mr. Saxon will
impose liability on Fortuna as a joint and several obligor with
respect to those liabilities. Fortuna's exposure is equivalent to
that of a guarantor of Mr. Saxon's liability.

Therefore, this case is automatically stayed. The stay will remain
in effect until such a time as the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York lifts the stay as to Fortuna or Mr.
Saxon, or such a time as the Court orders the stay lifted as to Mr.
Saxon. Plaintiff is directed to file a letter updating the Court on
the status of this case on or about Sept. 1, 2025 and every three
months thereafter until the stay is lifted.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=MEGfey from PacerMonitor.com.

                   About Fortuna Auction LLC

Fortuna Auction LLC is a boutique auction house specializing in
fine, antique jewelry and luxury watches. Established in 2011, the
Company offers a platform for collectors, wholesalers, retailers,
and private clients to buy and sell jewelry and watches
internationally.

Fortuna Auction LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.: 25-10632 on April 1,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets between
$100,000 and $500,000 and estimated liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.

The Debtor is represented by Tracy L. Klestadt, Esq. at KLESTADT
WINTER JURELLER SOUTHARD & STEVENS, LLP.


GAUCHO GROUP: Nasdaq to Delist Common Stock After Suspension
------------------------------------------------------------
The Nasdaq Stock Market announced that it will delist the common
stock of Gaucho Group Holdings, Inc.

Gaucho Group's stock was suspended on November 22, 2024 and has not
traded on Nasdaq since that time. Nasdaq will file a Form 25 with
the Securities and Exchange Commission to complete the delisting.
The delisting becomes effective 10 days after the Form 25 is
filed.

For news and additional information about the company, including
the basis for the delisting and whether the company's securities
are trading on another venue, please review the company's public
filings or contact the company directly.

For more information about The Nasdaq Stock Market, visit the
Nasdaq Web site at http://www.nasdaq.com.Nasdaq's rules governing
the delisting of securities can be found in the Nasdaq Rule 5800
Series, available on the Nasdaq Web site:
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules/nasdaq-5800-series.

                About Gaucho Group Holdings Inc.

Gaucho Group Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware holding company
headquartered in Miami, Fla., which owns certain subsidiaries
including operating companies that own a winery, boutique hotel and
real property in Argentina.

Gaucho filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
24-21852) on November 12, 2024, with $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities.

Nathan G. Mancuso, Esq., at Mancuso Law, P.A. is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


GENESIS GLOBAL: Moro's Administrative Expense Claim Request Nixed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sean H. Lane of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York denied the application of Soichiro
"Michael" Moro for allowance of an administrative expense claim
under Bankruptcy Code Sections 503(b)(3)(D) and 503(b)(4) for
counsel's services incurred in making a substantial contribution to
Genesis Global Holdco, LLC, et al.'s Chapter 11 cases.

The basis for Mr. Moro's request is the filing in March 2023 of his
Motion for Entry of an Order Modifying the Automatic Stay, to the
Extent Applicable, to Allow for Advancement and Payments Under D&O
Insurance Policy. Mr. Moro previously served as the chief executive
officer of Debtor Genesis Global Capital, LLC and chief executive
officer and chief operating officer of non-Debtor Genesis Global
Trading, Inc. In connection with his former roles, Mr. Moro
incurred hundreds of thousands of dollars in defense costs relating
to pending lawsuits, investigations, and disputes, and expected to
incur additional defenses costs for similar matters in the future.
As a result, Mr. Moro sought an order modifying the stay, to the
extent applicable, to allow him to enforce his rights and demand
(and receive) proceeds payable under a D&O Policy for defense
costs. The Debtors did not oppose the relief sought, but requested
it be expanded to include all Insured Individuals and Insurance
Policies. Mr. Moro did not object to the expansion. The Lift Stay
Order was entered on May 9, 2023, permitting all Insured
Individuals to enforce their rights and demand and receive proceeds
from Insurers under all Insurance Policies.

Mr. Moro now argues that because the Debtors did not consent to the
relief sought in the Lift Stay Motion prior to its filing, he was
forced to file and prosecute the motion. He seeks payment of
$119,826.11 incurred by his counsel for prosecuting the Lift Stay
Motion, claiming that this was a substantial contribution" in these
cases that resulted in significant benefits. The Debtors oppose the
application by arguing, among other things, that Mr. Moro was
acting in his own self-interest and that, in any event, the relief
only benefitted a small subset of creditors.

The Court finds that Mr. Moro has not met the burden necessary for
the award of an administrative expense claim.

According to the Court, Mr. Moro's efforts were motivated by
self-interest because the Lift Stay Motion was filed to benefit him
personally.

The Court also finds the benefit conferred does not justify a
finding of substantial contribution. Mr. Moro argues that his
efforts resulted in substantial benefits beyond merely himself,
which include:

   (i) that Insured Individuals can seek and receive reimbursement
from Insurers,   
  (ii) a corresponding reduction in the claims pool, leaving more
funds available for distribution to other creditors, and
(iii) a reduction in legal fees incurred by the Debtors' estates
by obviating the need for the Debtors to address hypothetical lift
stay motions or indemnification claims filed by other Insured
Individuals.

But the Court disagrees. In fact, the stay relief affected only a
small subset of creditors.

Mr. Moro's actions also forced the Debtors to incur additional
legal fees and expenses in addressing the Lift Stay Motion and
objecting to this Application, further increasing administrative
costs to the estate and reducing any overall benefit, the Court
adds.

While the Court finds that Mr. Moro's counsel's services were not
duplicative of services provided by other professionals, the relief
sought was ordinary and routine. Such routine activities do not
constitute a substantial contribution, the Court concludes.

Accordingly, the Application is denied, and the Objection is
sustained.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qxkBTG from PacerMonitor.com.

Counsel for the Wind-Down Debtors:

Sean A. O'Neal, Esq.
Luke A. Barefoot, Esq.
Jane VanLare, Esq.
Thomas S. Kessler, Esq.
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
One Liberty Plaza
New York, NY 10006
E-mail: soneal@cgsh.com
        lbarefoot@cgsh.com
        jvanlare@cgsh.com
        tkessler@cgsh.com

Counsel for Soichiro "Michael" Moro:

Benjamin Mintz, Esq.
Marcus Asner, Esq.
Justin Imperato, Esq.
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
250 West 55th Street
New York, NY 10019
E-mail: benjamin.mintz@arnoldporter.com
        marcus.asner@arnoldporter.com
        justin.imperato@arnoldporter.com

                      About Genesis Global

Genesis Global Holdco, LLC, through its subsidiaries, and Global
Trading, Inc., provide lending and borrowing, spot trading,
derivatives and custody services for digital assets and fiat
currency.

Genesis Global Capital, LLC (GGC) and Genesis Asia Pacific PTE.
LTD. (GAP) provide lending and borrowing, spot trading, derivatives
and custody services for digital assets and fiat currency. Genesis
Global Holdco, LLC owns 100% of GGC and GAP.

Genesis Global Holdco, LLC, GGC and GAP each filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 23-10063) on Jan. 19, 2023. The cases are
pending before the Honorable Sean H. Lane.

At the time of the filing, Genesis Holdco reported $100 million to
$500 million in both assets and liabilities.

Genesis Holdco is a sister company of Genesis Global Trading, Inc.
("GGT") and 100% owned by Digital Currency Group, Inc. ("DCG").
GGT, DCG and certain of the Holdco subsidiaries are not included in
the Chapter 11 filings. The non-debtor subsidiaries include Genesis
UK Holdco Limited, Genesis Global Assets, LLC, Genesis Asia (Hong
Kong) Limited, Genesis Bermuda Holdco Limited, Genesis Custody
Limited ("GCL"), GGC International Limited ("GGCI"), GGA
International Limited, Genesis Global markets Limited, GSB 2022 II
LLC, GSB 2022 III LLC and GSB 2022 I LLC.

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, LLP as
bankruptcy counsel; Morrison Cohen, LLP as special counsel; Alvarez
& Marsal Holdings, LLC as financial advisor; and Moelis & Company,
LLC as investment banker. Kroll Restructuring Administration, LLC,
is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent and administrative
advisor.

The ad hoc group of creditors is represented by Kirkland & Ellis,
LLP and Kirkland & Ellis International, LLP. The ad hoc group of
Genesis lenders is represented by Proskauer Rose, LLP. The U.S.
Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee to represent
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases. The committee
tapped White & Case, LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Houlihan Lokey
Capital, Inc., as investment banker; Berkeley Research Group, LLC
as financial advisor; and Kroll as information agent.




GIRARD HOUSE: Claims to be Paid From Property Sale Proceeds
-----------------------------------------------------------
Girard House Cooperative, LCA filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Columbia a Disclosure Statement for Chapter 11
Plan dated March 14, 2025.

Girard House consists of one apartment building, constructed in
1947, totaling 36 units located at 744 Girard Street NW in the
Columbia Heights neighborhood of Washington, DC, near Howard
University.

The building has three stories plus a ground floor/basement (which
contains utility rooms, laundry room, storage areas and some
units). There are 32 one-bedroom units and four two-bedroom units.
The on-site laundry area doubles as a community meeting room.

Day-to-day management of the building, including collecting
revenue, paying bills and making repairs, has been delegated to a
management company. Currently, that role is filled by EJF Real
Estate Services, a management company with offices in Washington,
DC focused on community association management.

Since the filing of its bankruptcy, the Debtor has continued its
effort to stabilize its finances. It increased carrying charges
(for the first time in many years) by 10%, rented some of its
vacant units, and has actively pursued delinquent residents to try
to recover outstanding payments. The goal is to achieve full paying
occupancy as quickly as possible. However, at present and
throughout the duration of the bankruptcy case, the Debtor's
revenue has been insufficient to pay its ongoing operating expenses
and debt service to the Noteholder.  

The Plan provides for the Debtor to sell its Property to Mi Casa,
Inc., with closing on or before June 30, 2025. Proceeds from the
sale to Mi Casa will be used to pay the existing first trust lien
(Class 3 – the Noteholder). Additional funding for Plan
obligations may come from the DHCD award. Aside from the Noteholder
and the administrative expenses of this bankruptcy case, the Debtor
has little current debt.

The Debtor and Mi Casa have entered into a Contract of Purchase and
Sale (the "Purchase Contract") originally dated December 20, 2024.
As amended, that Purchase Contract provides for a gross sales price
of $4,500,000.

The sale is expected to be accomplished pursuant to the provisions
of the Chapter 11 Plan as presently stated and as it may be
amended. Bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C. § 1146) exempts such sales from
transfer taxes, saving roughly $130,500 that would otherwise be due
to the District of Columbia upon sale of the Debtor's Property.
Bankruptcy sales are likewise exempt from the provisions of TOPA.

Unsecured debts:

     * Class 5 consists of the pre-petition unsecured claim of Mi
Casa, Inc. for development fees incurred in assisting the Debtor in
the acquisition and renovation of its Property. This claim shall be
paid from proceeds of the closing of the sale of the Property to Mi
Casa.

     * Class 6 consists of the claims of the District of Columbia
Department of Buildings and Department of Public Works for housing
code violation penalties. Penalties are generally disfavored and
subordinate under bankruptcy law. Paying these penalties could
impair the Debtor's ability to close on the Purchase Contract.
Accordingly, the Debtor’s Plan provides that no payment shall be
made on these claims.

Upon the establishment of the Cooperative, in exchange for payment
of an initial membership fee some residents became members of the
Cooperative. The Plan classifies those member interests as Class 7.
It provides that those equity interests of the Debtor's
shareholders shall be canceled upon the Effective Date of the Plan.
However, for so long as they remain residents in the Debtor's
Property, Members will continue to benefit from Mi Casa's
commitment to maintain the Property as affordable housing and those
Members will become tenants of Mi Casa.

Funding for the Plan will come from two sources:

     * The sale by the Debtor to Mi Casa of the Debtor's Property,
for $4,500,000.

     * Funds allocated to the Debtor by DHCD, in the anticipated
amount of approximately $1,700,226, $1,065,000 of which will go
toward Mi Casa's purchase of the Property.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 14, 2025
is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=3uA40H from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Girard House Cooperative, LCA is represented by:

     David E. Lynn, Esq.
     DAVID E. LYNN, P.C.
     15245 Shady Grove Road, Suite 465 North
     Rockville, MD 20850
     Phone: (301) 255-0100
     Email: davidlynn@verizon.net

                  About Girard House Cooperative

Girard House is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Girard House Cooperative, LCA filed its voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.D.C. Case
No. 24-00260) on July 19, 2024, listing $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Hilda
Ziegler, Board President.

Judge Elizabeth L Gunn presides over the case.

David E. Lynn, Esq., at DAVID E. LYNN, P.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.


HARRIS ENERGY: Findings of Fact in Two Adversary Cases Issued
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Katherine Maloney Perhach of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin makes findings of fact
and conclusions of law in the following adversary proceedings:

  (1) Harris Energy Group, Inc. et al.,  Plaintiffs, v.
Thomas A. Berutti et al., Defendants, Adv. No. 23-2078; and

  (2) Renewable World Energies, LLC,  Plaintiff, v.
William D. Harris et al., Defendants, Adv. No. 23-2080

All of the matters before the Court are civil proceedings arising
under title 11, or arising in or related to cases under title 11.
The fraudulent transfer claims, the preferential transfer claims,
and the equitable subordination claim pled in Adv. No. 23-2078, the
fraudulent transfer and avoidance claims pled in Adv. No. 23-2080,
and the objections to Thomas Berutti's proof of claim filed by
Harris Energy Group, Inc. and  William Harris in the underlying
bankruptcy case arise under title 11 or arise in a case under title
11. The breach of fiduciary duty claims pled in Adv. No. 23-2078
arise under title 11, arise in a case under title 11, or are
related to HEG's bankruptcy case because resolution of the dispute
affects the amount of property for distribution [i.e., the debtor's
estate] or the allocation of property among creditors.

The Court held a bench trial on the claims asserted in the
adversary proceedings and the claim objections filed in the
underlying bankruptcy case.

On March 22, 2023, Mr. Berutti filed a proof of claim in the amount
of $672,206.20. The basis for Mr. Berutti's claim was his 2017
Employment Agreement with HEG. Mr. Berutti asserted in his claim
that he was terminated "without cause" and that he was entitled to
compensation for five years, the entire balance of the employment
term stated in the 2017 Employment Agreement, plus all unpaid
personal time off. Mr. Berutti acknowledged in his claim that
because of the limitations imposed under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 502(b)(7),
his claim would be limited in this bankruptcy case to one year of
unpaid compensation under the 2017 Employment Agreement plus all
unpaid personal time off.

HEG and Mr. Harris objected to Mr. Berutti's claim, asserting that
Mr. Berutti's claim should not be allowed because Mr. Berutti was
terminated "for cause" under the terms of the
2017 Employment Agreement with HEG. According to HEG and Mr.
Harris, HEG's Board of Directors determined that Mr. Berutti's
continued employment would expose HEG to "substantial, material
harm" and HEG's Board of Directors terminated Mr. Berutti "for
cause" immediately and without notice. HEG and Mr. Harris asserted
in their claim objections that because Mr. Berutti was properly
terminated "for cause," his claim is contractually limited under
the terms of the 2017 Employment Agreement to  his pro-rated
compensation earned through the date of his termination plus his
unpaid personal time off.

Adversary Proceeding No. 23-2078

On June 28, 2023, HEG and RWE filed an adversary complaint against
Mr. Berutti, the Berutti Trust, and Berutti Energy. HEG and RWE
asserted eight causes of action in their complaint. In their first
cause of action, they asserted that Mr. Berutti breached his
fiduciary duty of loyalty by:

   (1) causing RWE to transfer to Mr. Berutti 50% of RWE's equity
interest in Sugarloaf Hydro, LLC without providing RWE with any
consideration;
   (2) engineering a transaction with RWE for the sale and buyback
of Eau Galle Hydro, LLC  and Grande Pointe Power Corporation which
deprived RWE of nearly $1 million;
   (3) negotiating a self-serving severance agreement in
Mr. Berutti's favor that would have deprived HEG of all cash
resulting from the sale of certain assets and saddling HEG
with debts it could not support all to the detriment of HEG's
creditors and equity holders; and
   (4) requiring that HEG and LCO Hydro, LLC guarantee a loan
between Sugarloaf Hydro and Berutti Energy, when Mr. Berutti had
caused RWE to transfer to Mr. Berutti 50% of its equity interest in
Sugarloaf Hydro.

In their second through fourth causes of action, HEG and RWE sought
to avoid and recover alleged fraudulent transfers to Berutti Energy
of RWE's equity interests in Eau Galle Hydro and Grande Pointe
Power. In their fifth cause of action, HEG and RWE sought to avoid
and recover an alleged fraudulent transfer to the Berutti Trust of
RWE's equity interest in Sugarloaf Hydro. In their sixth and
seventh causes of action, HEG and RWE sought to avoid and recover
an alleged preferential transfer made by RWE to Berutti Energy in
the amount of $175,000 and an alleged preferential transfer made by
HEG to Berutti Energy of a security interest in HEG's membership
interest in LCO Hydro. In their eighth cause of action, HEG and RWE
requested that Mr. Berutti's and Berutti Energy's claims in the
bankruptcy case be equitably subordinated to all other claims in
the bankruptcy case.

Adversary Proceeding No. 23-2080

On June 29, 2023, RWE filed an adversary complaint against Berutti
Energy and Mr. Harris related to the Sugarloaf Hydro transaction.
The three claims in the adversary proceeding
sought to avoid and recover the alleged fraudulent transfer to Mr.
Harris of RWE's equity interest in Sugarloaf Hydro and to avoid and
recover the subsequent transfer by Mr. Harris to
Berutti Energy of any interest in the membership interests in
Sugarloaf Hydro transferred to Mr. Harris by RWE.

The Court ruled as follows:

   1. Claim No. 1 filed by Thomas A. Berutti in In re Harris Energy
Group, Inc., No. 23-21117-kmp, is allowed as a general unsecured
claim in the amount of $499,902.20, of which $3,086.49 is entitled
to priority under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 507(a)(4).

   2. Claim No. 2 filed by Berutti Energy, LLC in In re Harris
Energy Group, Inc., Case No. 23-21117-kmp, is equitably
subordinated to all other claims.

   3. Plaintiff Harris Energy Group, Inc. shall recover from
Defendant Thomas A. Berutti the amount of one million dollars
($1,000,000.00) on the First Claim for Relief in Harris Energy
Group, Inc. et al. v. Berutti et al., Adv. No. 23-2078, and the
Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

   4. The security interest that Harris Energy Group, Inc. granted
to Berutti Energy, LLC in its membership interest in LCO Hydro, LLC
is avoided as a preferential transfer, and the Clerk shall enter
judgment in favor of the Plaintiff on the Seventh Claim for Relief
in Harris Energy Group, Inc. et al. v. Berutti et al., Adv. No.
23-2078.

  5. All other relief requested in the complaints filed as Harris
Energy Group, Inc. et al. v. Berutti et al., Adv. No. 23-2078 and
Renewable World Energies, LLC v. Harris et al., Adv. No. 23-2080,
is denied.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=qLtoRb from PacerMonitor.com.

                   About Harris Energy Group

Harris Energy Group, Inc. and affiliates own, operate, and develop
hydroelectric power plants in Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa, and
Illinois, generating power for sale to public utilities,
governmental agencies, and private power producers. The plants
generate power when water from rivers or lakes flows through the
blades of a turbine. The turbines are connected to a generator that
makes electricity, which is then sold to either the Midcontinent
Independent System Operation or other public entities or private
companies through power purchase agreements.

Harris Energy and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wis. Lead Case No.
23-21117) on March 16, 2023. In the petition signed by its
chairman, William D. Harris, Harris Energy disclosed up to $50,000
in assets and up to $1 million in liabilities.

Judge Katherine Maloney Perhach oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Paul G. Swanson, Esq., at Steinhilber Swanson,
LLP as legal counsel; MS Financial Services as financial advisor;
and Trace Forensic Experts, LLC as forensic analyst.


HERITAGE COLLEGIATE: Amends Unsecured Claims Pay Details
--------------------------------------------------------
Heritage Collegiate Apparel, Inc. f/k/a M-Den, Inc., d/b/a The M
Den submitted a Third Amended Combined Plan of Liquidation and
Disclosure Statement dated March 14, 2025.

The Debtor proposes this Third Amended Plan of Liquidation for the
resolution of outstanding Creditor Claims and equity Interests.

The Debtor will retain and distribute the Sale Proceeds and will
retain the right to pursue MCA Adversary Proceedings. If proceeds
are generated from any MCA Adversary Proceedings they will be paid
to the Liquidation Trust. Pursuant to Plan section 3.12.6, if the
Debtor is in possession of Sale Proceeds or other funds after
payment of all Claims with higher priority than non-priority
Unsecured Creditors, such amounts will be transferred to the
Liquidation Trust.

The Liquidation Trust will, after payment of the Allowed Secured
Claim of Bank of Ann Arbor, be equitably subrogated to the rights
of Bank of Ann Arbor in the Bank of Ann Arbor Related Entity Loan
Documents and will distribute the proceeds of the Bank of Ann Arbor
Related Entity Loan Documents. The Liquidation Trust will also take
title to and distribute the proceeds of all Avoidance Actions and
all Causes of Action other than the MCA Adversary Proceedings.

The assets that the Debtor will administer are (i) the Sale
Proceeds and (ii) any MCA Adversary Proceedings.

The Debtor estimates that the Sale Proceeds (excluding amounts in
the Professional Fee Account) will total approximately $9,578,3745
as of May 1, 2025. Of this amount, the Debtor estimates that
$127,944 will be used to pay United States Trustee Fees, $90,795
will be used to pay Priority Tax Claims, leaving a balance of
$9,359,635.

The primary asset being transferred to the Trust for distribution
to Class XII non-priority Unsecured Creditors are the rights to
collect the approximately $3,521,445 owed under the Bank of Ann
Arbor Related Entity Loan Documents, which amount is secured by the
Related Entity Mortgages on the Related Entity Real Estate. In
addition, the Trust will hold the right to collect $592,634 owed by
Stadium Properties to the Debtor and other Causes of Action and
Avoidance Actions, the proceeds of which may be sufficient to
result in a distribution to Class XII nonpriority Unsecured
Creditors.

Class XII shall consist of the Allowed Claims of Unsecured
Creditors. The Debtor estimates that the total of all Allowed
Unsecured Claims will equal approximately $31,609,981.44 (the
"Estimated Claim Pool"). All Allowed Claims of Unsecured Creditors
shall transfer to the Liquidation Trust and shall be paid from the
Liquidation Trust in their order of priority and according to the
terms of the Liquidation Trust.

Upon payment in full of Bank of Ann Arbor's Allowed Secured Claim,
all of Bank of Ann Arbor's rights, title and interest in, to and
under the Bank of Ann Arbor Related Entity Loan Documents will
transfer to the Liquidation Trust, and all of the Debtor's claims,
rights and interest in equitable subrogation to Bank of Ann Arbor's
rights against the Related Entities and the Related Entity Real
Estate shall automatically be deemed to have been transferred and
assigned to the Liquidation Trust.

As a result of the transfer of the Related Entity Loan Documents to
the Liquidation Trust the Debtor estimates that the Liquidation
Trust will receive approximately $3,521,445 as a result of its
rights under the Related Entity Loan Documents.

In the event the Claims of Ownership filed by the MCA Creditors are
Allowed there will not be any Sale Proceeds available for payment
of Allowed Unsecured Claims. However, the Debtor disputes these
Claims of Ownership and believes that nothing (or dramatically
less) is owed to these MCA Creditors. On or before the Effective
Date, the Debtor will file the (i) Family Fund Adversary
Proceeding, (ii) Vault Capital Adversary Proceeding, and (iii)
Elemental Adversary Proceeding (collectively, the "MCA Adversary
Proceedings").

If any Adversary Proceeding results in a judgment or Court Order
("MCA Judgment") determining that any MCA Creditor owes a monetary
obligation to the Debtor, the Debtor's right, title and interest in
the MCA Judgment shall be deemed automatically transferred to the
Liquidation Trust, except that the Debtor shall retain standing to
defend the appeal of an MCA Judgment.

After payment of all (i) Allowed Secured Claims, (ii) Allowed
Claims of Ownership, (iii) Allowed Administrative Claims, (iv)
United States Trustee Fees, (v) Allowed Priority Claims, (vi)
Professional Fees, and (vii) any other Allowed Claims of higher
priority, all remaining funds in the Debtor's debtor-in-possession
bank accounts will be paid to the Liquidation Trust for
distribution to creditors pursuant to the terms of the Liquidation
Trust.

Upon transfer of any remaining funds to the Liquidation Trust in
accordance with section 3.12.6 or the depletion of the Debtor's
Available Proceeds, the Litigation Trust shall be responsible for
payment of any unpaid Professional Fees incurred by Debtor after
the Confirmation Date related to advising the Debtor on the final
aspect of winding down its business and implementation of the Plan
and Confirmation Order. This Class is Impaired.

On and after the Effective Date, the Plan Administrator will have
the sole and exclusive power to exercise all rights and decision
making authority reserved for the Debtor under the Plan. Any
actions taken by Debtor on and after the Effective Date shall be
taken only at the direction of, and on the authorization of, the
Plan Administrator.

The Liquidation Trustee and the Debtor will execute the Trust
Agreement on or before the Effective Date. The Committee shall
select the Liquidation Trustee and he/she shall be appointed
pursuant to the terms of the Liquidation Trust, and shall have the
powers, duties, and obligations set forth therein. Wolfson Bolton
Kochis PLLC will be retained by the Liquidating Trustee for all
matters as determined by the Liquidating Trustee.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Combined Plan and Disclosure
Statement dated March 14, 2025 is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=7DwaDW from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Kim K. Hillary, Esq.
     Howard Borin, Esq.
     Schafer and Weiner, PLLC
     40950 Woodward Avenue, Suite 100
     Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
     Tel: (248) 540-3340
     Email: khillary@schaferandweiner.com

                About Heritage Collegiate Apparel

Heritage Collegiate Apparel, Inc., serves as the official retailer
of the University of Michigan Athletic Department. For more than 20
years, the Debtor has provided a selection of clothing, merchandise
and gifts to the University of Michigan.

Heritage Collegiate Apparel filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
24-47922) on Aug. 16, 2024, listing $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities. The petition
was signed by Scott Hirth as president.

Judge Thomas J. Tucker presides over the case.

Kim K. Hillary, Esq., at Schafer and Weiner, PLLC represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.

On September 3, 2024, the United States Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors in this Chapter 11 case.
The committee tapped Wolfson Bolton Kochis PLLC as counsel and
Capstone Partners as financial advisor.


HERTZ CORP: Musacchio Labor Suit Dismissed as Void Ab Initio
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Orelia E. Merchant of the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of New York dismissed the case captioned as
STEPHEN MUSACCHIO, Plaintiff, -against- THE HERTZ CORPORATION,
Defendant, Case No. 20-cv-05705-OEM-SIL (E.D.N.Y.) as void ab
initio without prejudice.

On Nov. 23, 2020, Plaintiff Stephen Musacchio commenced this action
against Defendant The Hertz Corporation, invoking diversity
jurisdiction pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 1332, seeking more than
$75,000.00 in damages for claims asserted under New York Labor Law
Sec. 740. On Dec. 18, 2020, Defendant appeared and filed a
suggestion of bankruptcy and notice of automatic stay.
Specifically, Defendant indicated that it had filed a bankruptcy
petition on May 22, 2020, in the United States District Court for
the District of Delaware under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
and that, pursuant to Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the
commencement of the chapter 11 cases operates as a stay applicable
to Defendant as a debtor in bankruptcy court on the commencement or
continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a
judicial, administrative or other action or proceeding against the
debtor that was or could have been commenced before the
commencement of the case under this title, or to recover a claim
against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case
under this title.

Defendant seeks dismissal of this action as void ab initio because
it was filed after the automatic stay was in effect.

Plaintiff opposes dismissal on the grounds that:

   (1) Plaintiff was not aware of Defendant's bankruptcy until
after he had initiated this action,
   (2) Defendant waited too long to raise this defense, and
   (3) Defendant has not objected to Plaintiff's involvement in the
bankruptcy proceeding.

Further, Plaintiff argues that this action should remain stayed
until Defendant's bankruptcy has been resolved.

The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should
not be dismissed as void ab initio.

The Court finds Plaintiff commenced this action against Defendant
in violation of the bankruptcy automatic stay, because this action
was filed after the automatic stay took effect. Judge Merchant
says, "It is immaterial that Plaintiff did not have notice of the
bankruptcy stay at the time that he filed this action because the
stay is, as its name implies, automatic and therefore requires no
action by the debtor to be enforced. Plaintiff does not represent
whether he sought and obtained relief from the automatic stay in
the bankruptcy court to file or continue this civil action. The
filing of this civil complaint in violation of the stay is thus
void from its commencement, and therefore, this action is
dismissed."

Plaintiff argues that dismissal is not warranted because Defendant
was knowingly stealthily silent, and failed to act during his
unknowing violation of the bankruptcy automatic stay. According to
the Court, Plaintiff has known of the existence and operation of
the automatic stay since the outset of this action in 2020. The
Court is not persuaded that Defendant remained stealthily silent to
reap strategic or monetary advantage.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=efFaHb from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About Hertz Corp.

Hertz Corp. and its subsidiaries -- http://www.hertz.com/--
operate a worldwide vehicle rental business under the Hertz,
Dollar, and Thrifty brands, with car rental locations in North
America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia, Australia, the
Caribbean, the Middle East, and New Zealand. They also operate a
vehicle leasing and fleet management solutions business.

On May 22, 2020, The Hertz Corporation and certain of its U.S. and
Canadian subsidiaries and affiliates filed voluntary petitions for
reorganization under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-11218).

Judge Mary F. Walrath oversees the cases.  

The Debtors have tapped White & Case LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as local counsel, Moelis
& Co. as investment banker, and FTI Consulting as financial
advisor. The Debtors also retained the services of Boston
Consulting Group to assist the Debtors in the development of their
business plan. Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Regions 3 and 9 appointed a Committee to
represent unsecured creditors in Debtors' Chapter 11 cases. The
Committee has tapped Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its
bankruptcy counsel, Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP as
Delaware counsel, UBS Securities LLC as investment banker, and
Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisor. Ernst & Young
LLP provides audit and tax services to the Committee.

                *     *     *

Hertz Global and its subsidiaries emerged from Chapter 11
bankruptcy at the end of June 2021. Hertz won approval of a Plan of
Reorganization that unimpaired all classes of creditors (who are
legally deemed to have accepted it) and was approved by more than
97% of voting shareholders. The Plan provided for the existing
shareholders to receive more than $1 billion of value.

Recovery by shareholders of close to $8 a share was made possible
after a fierce competition among bidders for control in the
company. Initial offers from potential bidders for Hertz in its
bankruptcy offered nothing for equity. Hertz in May 2021 selected
investment firms Knighthead Capital Management LLC and Certares
Management LLC, joined by other investors including Apollo Global
Management Inc. and a group of existing shareholders, as the
winning bidders for control of the bankrupt company.  A rival group
that included Centerbridge Partners LP, Warburg Pincus LLC and
Dundon Capital Partners LLC was outbid at auction.

Hertz's Plan eliminated over $5 billion of debt, including all of
Hertz Europe's corporate debt, and will provide more than $2.2
billion of global liquidity to the reorganized Company. Hertz also
emerged with (i) a new $2.8 billion exit credit facility consisting
of at least $1.3 billion of term loans and a revolving loan
facility, and (ii) an $7 billion of asset-backed vehicle financing
facility, each on favorable terms.


HIGH POINT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: High Point, LLC
          AW Innovative Circuits, LLC
          AW Spitfire International
          AW Innovative Circuits
          AW Innovative Circuits, Inc.
       7615 US Hwy 70 #1020
       Nashville, TN 37221

Business Description: High Point, LLC, doing business as
                      Innovative Circuits, Inc., is a
                      comprehensive contract electronics
                      manufacturing company with expertise in
                      electronics design and production.  The
                      Company offers a variety of services,
                      including component procurement, inventory
                      management, printed circuit board assembly,
                      in-circuit and functional testing, sub-
                      assembly, box build, and extensive
                      engineering support.  It serves a wide range
                      of industries such as telecommunications,
                      computer and server products, microprocessor
                      development systems, data acquisition,
                      automotive aftermarket, emergency lighting,
                      shipping and package distribution,
                      industrial test equipment, railroad
                      transportation, and medical applications,
                      among others.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Tennessee

Case No.: 25-01563

Judge: Hon. Charles M Walker

Debtor's Counsel: Robert J. Gonzales, Esq.
                  EMERGELAW, PLC
                  4235 Hillsboro Pike, Suite 300
                  Nashville, TN 37215
                  Tel: (615) 815-1535
                  E-mail: ecf@emerge.law

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Gregory Jay Ramsey as member.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/4JSDZMA/High_Point_LLC__tnmbke-25-01563__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


HYPERSCALE DATA: Stockholders OK Series G Stock Conversion
----------------------------------------------------------
Hyperscale Data, Inc. held a Special Meeting of Stockholders. As of
January 28, 2025, the record date for the Meeting, the Company had
outstanding and entitled to vote:

     (i) 1,259,893 shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001
per share issued and outstanding,
    (ii) 4,998,597 shares of its Class B Common Stock, par value
$0.001 per share issued and outstanding,
   (iii) 50,000 shares of its Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
issued and outstanding and
    (iv) 860 shares of its Series G Convertible Preferred Stock
issued and outstanding, which together constitute all of the
outstanding voting capital stock of the Company.

At the Meeting, stockholders approved, pursuant to Rule 713(a) and
(b) of the NYSE American, of the conversion of the Company's 25,000
shares of the Series G Preferred Stock into the Company's Class A
Common Stock and warrants to purchase shares of Class A Common
Stock, for a total purchase price of up to $25,000,000, pursuant to
the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 21, 2024.

                       About Hyperscale Data

Headquartered in Las Vegas, NV, Hyperscale Data, Inc., formerly
known as Ault Alliance, Inc., is transitioning from a diversified
holding company pursuing growth by acquiring undervalued businesses
and disruptive technologies with a global impact to becoming solely
an owner and operator of data centers to support high performance
computing services. Through its wholly and majority-owned
subsidiaries and strategic investments, Hyperscale Data owns and
operates a data center at which it mines digital assets and offers
colocation and hosting services for the emerging artificial
intelligence ecosystems and other industries. It also provides,
through its wholly owned subsidiary, Ault Capital Group, Inc.,
mission-critical products that support a diverse range of
industries, including an artificial intelligence software platform,
social gaming platform, equipment rental services,
defense/aerospace, industrial, automotive, medical/biopharma and
hotel operations. In addition, Hyperscale Data is actively engaged
in private credit and structured finance through a licensed lending
subsidiary.

New York, New York-based Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 16, 2024, citing that the Company has a working capital
deficiency, has incurred net losses, and needs to raise additional
funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


IRONWOOD GROUP: Hires Kutner Brinen Dickey as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ironwood Group, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Colorado to employ Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley
PC as legal counsel.

The firm will render these services:

     (a) provide the Debtor with legal advice with respect to its
powers and duties;

     (b) aid the Debtor in the development of a plan of
reorganization under Chapter 11;

     (c) file the necessary petitions, pleadings, reports, and
actions which may be required in the continued administration of
the Debtor's property under Chapter 11;

     (d) take necessary actions to enjoin and stay until final
decree herein continuation of pending proceedings and to enjoin and
stay until final decree herein commencement of lien foreclosure
proceedings and all matters; and

     (e) perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
be necessary herein.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Jeffrey S. Brinen     $540 per hour
     Jonathan M. Dickey    $400 per hour
     Keri L. Riley         $390 per hour
     Paralegal             $100 per hour

In addition, the firm will seek reimbursement for expenses
incurred.

The firm received a pre-petition retainer of $3,000, of which $249
remained on the Petition Date. The firm further received a
post-petition retainer in the amount of $35,000 from Mark Hartman,
the owner of the Debtor.

Ms. Riley disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Keri L. Riley, Esq.
     Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, PC
     1660 Lincoln Street, Suite 1720
     Denver, CO 80264
     Tel: (303) 832-2910
     Email: klr@kutnerlaw.com

              About Ironwood Group, LLC

Ironwood Group LLC is a limited liability company.

Ironwood Group LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Col.Case No. 25-11625) on March 1, 2025.
In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets up to $50,000
and estimated liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

The Debtor is represented by Jeffrey S. Brinen, Esq. at KUTNER
BRINEN DICKEY RILEY PC.


K&NN TRUCKING: Continued Operations to Fund Plan Payments
---------------------------------------------------------
K&NN Trucking LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada a Plan of Reorganization for Small Business
dated March 14, 2025.

The Debtor is an LLC. Since 2019, the Debtor has been in the
business of hauling vehicles throughout the United States using
truck and trailer setups.

The Debtor filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11,
Subchapter V of the bankruptcy code to reorganize its debt by
amending its repayment schedule on loans to secured creditors. The
Debtor intends to continue to operate the 5 truck and trailer
combos and continue to haul vehicles as its sole source of revenue.


The Debtor has entered into repayment plans with each of the
secured creditors, and with those new payment plans, Debtor intends
to successfully reorganize and emerge from bankruptcy in the near
future.

The Plan Proponent's financial projections show that the Debtor
will have projected disposable income of $8,187.15 over the next 12
months, with estimated increased revenue beginning in 2026. The
final Plan payment is expected to be paid on or about 36 months
after confirmation of the plan.

This Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay creditors of the Debtor
from revenue generated by operating its trucking business, hauling
vehicles using financed truck and trailer combos.

Class 3 consists of non-priority unsecured creditors. Each holder
of a Class 3 allowed general unsecured, non-priority claim shall
receive its pro rata share of Debtor's disposable income remaining
over the term of the plan with said sum being paid in equal
payments on or before the last day of each month after the
effective date during the term of the plan, until the entire fixed
sum is distributed in full, which shall be in full satisfaction of
all Allowed general unsecured claims.

No General Unsecured creditor with an Allowed claim shall receive
more than the amount scheduled in the petition, unless the Court
order otherwise. Class 3 is impaired.

Class 4 is unimpaired and Holders of Equity Interests shall retain
their Equity Interests, subject to the terms of this Plan. Class 4
is unimpaired and deemed to have accepted this Plan.

The Plan will be funded through cash flow generated by future
operations of the Debtor's business.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated March 14, 2025
is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=LYFNx1 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About K&NN Trucking LLC

K&NN Trucking, LLC operates in the general freight trucking
industry.

K&NN Trucking sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 24-16543) on December 16,
2024. Nathan Nuesca, managing member of K&NN Trucking, signed the
petition.

As of November 30, 2024, K&NN Trucking had $809,191 in total assets
and $1,260,375 in total liabilities.

Judge Mike K. Nakagawa presides over the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   Damon K. Dias, Esq.
   Dias Law Group, Ltd.
   Tel: 702-380-3011
   Email: ddias@diaslawgroup.com


KC TRANSPORT: Hires Lee Suess LLC as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------
KC Transport, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Montana to employ Lee Suess, LLC as accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation of income tax
returns, income tax consulting, analysis of tax consequences of
proposed bankruptcy plans, and compiling reports.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Heidi Lee, CPA           $350 per hour
     Carissa Lerbakken, CPA   $350 per hour

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Heidi Lee, CPA, a partner at Lee Suess, LLC, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Heidi Lee, CPA
     Lee Suess, LLC
     210 University Ave.
     Williston, ND 58801
     Tel: (701) 577-2157
     Fax: (701) 577-4408
     Email: contact@leesuess.com

              About KC Transport, LLC

KC Transport LLC is a limited liability company.

KC Transport LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 25-10010) on January 25,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million each.

The Debtor is represented by James A. Patten, Esq. at PATTEN
PETERMAN BEKKEDAHL & GREEN, PLLC.


KENBENCO INC: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to May 21
------------------------------------------------------------
Kenbenco, Inc. and its affiliates received another extension from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York,
Poughkeepsie Division to use cash collateral until May 21.

The 10th interim order authorized the companies to use the cash
collateral of secured creditors, U.S. Small Business Administration
and Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC, in the ordinary course of
business as outlined in their budget.

To protect secured creditors, the court granted them continuing
rollover liens and security interests in the companies' assets with
the same priority and validity as their pre-bankruptcy liens.

The companies must also make payments to Newtek pursuant to the
terms of their previous stipulation.

The next hearing is set for May 20.

                       About Kenbenco Inc.

Kenbenco, Inc. is a structural and miscellaneous fabrication
company in Saugerties, N.Y. It conducts business under the name
Benson Steel Fabricators.

Kenbenco and its affiliates, JJ Ben Corporation and Ben Mur, Inc.,
filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
24-35470) on May 10, 2024. At the time of the filing, Kenbenco
reported between $500,001 and $1 million in assets and between $1
million and $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Kyu Young Paek oversees the cases.

The Debtor is represented by Michelle L. Trier, Esq., at Genova,
Malin & Trier, LLP.

Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC, as secured creditor is
represented by:

   Tae Hyun Whang, Esq.
   Law Offices of Tae H. Whang, LLC
   185 Bridge Plaza North, Suite 201
   Fort Lee, NJ 07024
   (201) 461-0300


KOLOGIK LLC: Dundon's Summary Judgment Bid in Thomas Suit Denied
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael A. Crawford of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Louisiana denied in its entirety plaintiff's
motion for partial summary judgment in the adversary proceeding
captioned as JACKSON SMITH THOMAS, PLAINTIFF V. KOLOGIK, LLC,
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BANK, MERCHANTS & MARINE BANCORP, INC.,
DEFENDANTS, ADVERSARY NO. 24-01019 (Bankr. M.D. La.).

As part of the confirmed plan in COPSync's bankruptcy case, Koligik
loaned the COPSync's liquidation trust funds to complete the
confirmation process and was defined as the Plan Exit Lender.
According to paragraph 5.13 of COPSync's Plan, Kologik, as the Plan
Exit Lender, was entitled to 11% of any recovery made from claims
against directors and officers, but only after a 40% contingency
fee and expenses were paid to counsel who prosecuted those claims.

To fund the Plan Exit Financing, Kologik borrowed funds from Thomas
and five others. On Nov. 18, 2018, Kologik borrowed $135,000 from
Thomas. Although the second loan was not memorialized in a separate
promissory note, Thomas and Kologik agree that the same terms apply
to that loan as in the Sept. 18, 2018, Note. In May 2019, Kologik
borrowed another $100,000 from Thomas. Thomas also made a separate
loan of $41,500 to Kologik for payroll.

Thomas loaned $235,000 of the total $753,000 borrowed by Kologik
from the Private Lenders. Under the terms of the Note, Thomas's pro
rata portion of the amount Kologik received for D&O and Chapter 5
Claims was 31.21%. These numbers are not in dispute.

On Dec. 16, 2019, Kologik borrowed $800,000 from MRB.

In November 2019, COPSync's liquidation trustee, H. Kenneth
Lefoldt, Jr., reached a settlement of the D&O Claims in the amount
of $3,750,000. The settlement was approved by the bankruptcy court
in New Orleans on Dec. 2, 2019.15

The motion is seeking summary judgment that:

   a) Kologik, LLC owed Thomas $397,352 as of Jan. 30, 2020,
according to the understanding of both parties, and as partially
reflected in a certain Non-Recourse Promissory Note executed by
Kologik in November 2018;
   b) The Note was modified by a compromise evidenced by a series
of emails on April 12, 2022, to reflect the understanding of the
parties that a 15% rate of interest accrued on Thomas's principal
during the pendency of a directors and officers liability
litigation that was managed by the bankruptcy trustee for debtor
COPsync, Inc.;
   c) Thomas has recourse on his Note up to $1,239,807;
   d) Thomas seized $1.3 million worth of accounts receivable in
his pre-petition attachment proceedings; and
   e) Thomas is permitted recourse against the assets of the estate
on his Note pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1111(b)(1)(A).

Pursuant to the Note, Judge Crawford concludes that Thomas is only
entitled to receive his pro rata share of Kologik's recovery
attributable to the D&O Claims. Thomas has not proved that he is
entitled to a percentage recovery on the $800,000 paid by the
Liquidation Trustee on Dec. 17, 2019. Thomas has not proved that a
settlement was reached sufficient to support modifying the Note to
include pre-default interest of 15%. And finally, Thomas may not
expand the pleadings in an attempt to recover funds for conspiracy
or to make out some kind of claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec.
1111(b)(1)(A), nor can he amend his complaint at this late stage of
the litigation. The court will enter a separate judgment in
accordance with this ruling.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=pf8Ocf from PacerMonitor.com.

                      About Kologik LLC

Kologik, LLC, a company in Baton Rouge, La., creates software that
connects small and medium-sized law enforcement departments to the
information they need to keep officers and communities safe.

Kologik and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. M.D.
La. Case No. 24-10311) on April 23, 2024. At the time of the
filing, Kologik reported up to $50,000 in assets and up to $10
million in liabilities.

Judge Michael A. Crawford presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Louis M. Phillips, Esq., at Kelley Hart & Pitre
as bankruptcy counsel and Wright, Moore, DeHart, Dupuis &
Hutchinson, LLC as tax accountants.



KYTTO ENTERPRISE: Hires Vilarino & Associates LLC as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Kytto Enterprise Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Puerto Rico to employ Vilarino & Associates,
LLC as counsel.

The firm will provide these services:

     (a) advise the Debtor concerning its duties, powers, and
responsibilities;

     (b) advise the Debtor in connection with a determination
whether reorganization is feasible;

     (c) assist the Debtor concerning negotiations with creditors
to propose and confirm a viable plan of reorganization;

     (d) prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, the necessary legal
papers or documents;

     (e) appear before the bankruptcy court, or any court in which
the Debtor asserts a claim interest or defense directly or
indirectly related to this bankruptcy case;

     (f) perform such other legal services for the Debtor as may be
required in these proceedings or in connection with the operation
and involvement with its business; and

     (g) employ other professional services, if necessary.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Javier Villarino, Attorney     $325 per hour
     Associates                     $250 per hour
     Paralegals                     $150 per hour

In addition, the firm will seek reimbursement for expenses
incurred.

Mr. Villarino disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Javier Villarino, Esq.
     Villarino & Associates LLC
     P.O. Box 9022515
     San Juan, PR 00902
     Tel: (787) 565-9894
     Email: jvillarino@vilarinolaw.com

              About Kytto Enterprise Inc.

Kytto Enterprise Inc., operating as Sushi Kytto Bar International
Steak House and Sushi Kytto Juncos, operates Japanese sushi
restaurants and steakhouse establishments across multiple locations
in Puerto Rico, with its principal place of business located in
Gurabo.

Kytto Enterprise Inc. sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 25-01382-11) on March 28,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets up to
$50,000 and estimated liabilities between $500,000 and $1 million.

The Debtor is represented by Javier Vilarino at VILARINO &
ASSOCIATES LLC.


LAND AND LAWN: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida issued
an interim order authorizing Land and Lawn, LLC to use cash
collateral.

The interim order authorized the company to use cash collateral to
fund necessary expenses under a court-approved budget, trustee
fees, and payments to secured creditor Commercial Credit Group,
Inc., with a 10% variance allowed.

The budget projects total operational expenses of $39,473.303 for
April and $32,473.30 for May.

As protection, Commercial Credit Group will be granted a perfected
post-petition lien on the cash collateral to the same extent and
with the same validity and priority as its pre-bankruptcy lien.

In addition, Land and Lawn was ordered to keep the secured
creditor's collateral insured as required by their loan agreement.

The next hearing is scheduled for May 21.

Commercial Credit Group is represented by:

   Megan W. Murray, Esq.
   Underwood Murray, P.A.
   100 N. Tampa St., Suite 2325
   Tampa, FL 33602
   Tel: (813) 540-8401
   Fax: (813) 553-5345
   mmurray@underwoodmurray.com

                       About Land and Lawn

Land and Lawn, LLC is a landscaping supply store in Fort Myers,
Fla., offering nursery and landscape suppy, sod, dirt, and mulch.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-01728) on November
12, 2024, with $2,938,950 in assets and $2,374,150 in liabilities.
Sarah Brooke Connolly, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Caryl E. Delano presides over the case.

Joseph Trunkett, Esq., at Trunkett Law Firm, LLC, doing business as
Gulf Coast, represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.


LEGENDARY FIELD: Dundon's Summary Judgment Bid Granted in Part
--------------------------------------------------------------
Chief Judge Craig A. Gargotta of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Texas denied in part and moot in part
Thomas Dundon and Dundon Capital Partners, LLC's motion for summary
judgment in the adversary proceeding captioned as RANDOLPH N.
OSHEROW, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estates Of Legendary
Field Exhibits, LLC, et al., Plaintiff, v. THOMAS DUNDON, JOHN
ZUTTER, and DUNDON CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, Defendant, ADV. NO.
22-05078-CAG (Bankr. W.D. Tex.).

Before the Court is Randolph Osherow in his capacity as the chapter
11 trustee's First Amended Complaint.

The following claims remain for the Court's consideration:

   (1) breach of oral contract against Dundon;
   (2) breach of contract against DCP;
   (3) breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing against
Dundon and DCP;
   (4) promissory estoppel against Dundon;
   (5) breach of fiduciary duty against Dundon;
   (6) fraudulent misrepresentation, fraud by nondisclosure, and
constructive fraud;
   (7) fraud in the inducement;
   (8) negligent misrepresentation;
   (9) unjust enrichment;
   (10) disallowance under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 502(d) against Dundon and
DCP; and,
   (11) equitable subordination.

This case arises from the creation and dissolution of an
alternative professional football league called the Alliance of
American Football, a developmental league conceptualized
by individuals with close ties to the sport of American football
for highly touted collegiate players and former NFL players to gain
exposure and garner interest from NFL teams. In its early stage,
the AAF was set to be financed by Reggie Fowler, a former part
owner of the Minnesota Vikings. The AAF founders were unaware that
Fowler engaged in criminal activity that resulted in the League's
deprivation of liquidity as it entered its inaugural season in
2019. One week into its first season, AAF leadership recognized it
lacked the sufficient funds necessary to maintain league
operations, including making player payroll. To remedy this,
Charles Ebersol, one of the AAF founders, engaged Thomas Dundon, an
alleged millionaire investor with ownership interests in Top Golf,
a professional hockey team, and Dundon Capital Partners, LLC, in a
series of phone calls beginning on Feb. 13, 2019 to discuss
financial aid scenarios.

After Dundon and DCP conducted brief due diligence on the
information Ebersol provided, Dundon, allegedly agreed to cover the
League's entire financial need until the League became financially
profitable which required approximately $250 million over several
years. This included the AAF's immediate need for payroll and
expenses.

To help facilitate the parties' agreement, John Zutter, a partner
of DCP, sent a draft term sheet to Ebersol. The Term Sheet provided
that DCP would fund an initial amount of $5.1 million and approve
additional funding requests up to $70 million. The Term Sheet also
stated that DCP would receive governance control of ESMG and 75
percent of ESMG's fully diluted capital stock.

By the time ESMG and the AAF filed for bankruptcy, ESMG received
roughly $70 million from Dundon-affiliated entity DDFS Partnership,
LP.

Prior to the AAF's bankruptcy petition, DCP and Dundon enter into a
document titled a "Release Agreement" in which the AAF and its
former majority shareholder Reginald Fowler agreed to release each
other from any claims related to the Series One Term Sheet. Fowler
was expected to support the AAF's change in ownership and control
to Dundon. At this time, one of the AAF's most valuable assets was
its "Standard Player Agreements" which obligated players to remain
in the AAF for three seasons to the exclusion of playing in any
other spring football league without being released.

At the hearings held on Jan. 31, 2025 and Feb. 3, 2025, Trustee
alleged that  Dundon sought to "takeover" the AAF as sole director
and decision-infiltrate the AAF from the inside out before
sabotaging the league's contracts, run the AAF as leanly as
possible, all with the intention of turning the company into a
prepackaged bankruptcy option for Dundon to acquire.

Trustee alleges Dundon failed to maximize the value of the player
contracts, gave free advertising to Dundon-affiliated entities, and
engaged in other instances of self-dealing.

Trustee also alleges that Dundon did not act in good faith to
preserve vendor contract value and keep the league operational.

Trustee explained that it has plead sufficient facts and
demonstrated adequate summary judgment evidence to rebut the
business judgment rule presumption and require the Court to employ
the more rigorous "entire fairness" analysis.

Defendant argues that the business judgment standard presumption is
correct. Defendant posits that if the Court applied entire
fairness, Trustee needed to "connect the dots" between a breach and
specific transaction.

Defendant argues that Trustee only identifies two transactions
specifically towards Defendant: (1) the $250 million funding
commitment and (2) the Fowler Release Agreement. As such, the Court
should dismiss the other claims because "Trustee makes no effort to
tie together particular transactions and interests that would
implicate breach of the duty of loyalty or bad faith.

In this case, the issue is whether the entire fairness test can be
applied to a non-shareholder, nonofficial director's actions when
that individual wielded significant authority over the business and
had "actual control." The Court is unpersuaded by Defendant's
contention that an operating shadow director may escape liability
for alleged wrongdoing solely because his wrongdoing is not
embedded into a single, official transaction. Trustee's theory of
the case is, at this stage, compelling: Dundon embedded his control
at numerous intervals with the intention of obtaining a prepackaged
bankruptcy.

Because there are genuine disputes of material fact as to (1)
whether Defendant operated as a controlling shadow director and (2)
whether the evidence satisfies the entire fairness test,
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment predicated upon the defense
of him not physically voting on the Release Agreement's approval is
denied.

All counts, with the exception of Count II, in Defendant's Motion
for Summary Judgment are denied. Count II is Moot.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=gTkJX4 from PacerMonitor.com.

The Chapter 7 cases are N RE: LEGENDARY FIELD EXHIBITIONS, LLC, AAF
PLAYERS, LLC; AAF PROPERTIES, LLC; EBERSOL SPORTS MEDIA GROUP,
INC.; LFE 2, LLC; WE ARE REALTIME, LLC., Chapter 7, Debtors,
Jointly Administered Under Case No. 19-50900-cag, Case No.
19-50902-cag., 19-50903-cag, 19-50904-cag, 19-50905-cag,
19-50906-cag (Bankr. W.D. Tex.).


LOCAL EATERIES: Hearing to Use Cash Collateral Set for April 16
---------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee,
Nashville Division is set to hold a hearing on April 16 to consider
another extension of Local Eateries, Inc.'s authority to use cash
collateral.

The company's authority to use cash collateral pursuant to the
court's April 4 interim order expires on April 18.

The interim order granted creditors, which may assert an interest
in the cash collateral, replacement liens on all post-petition
property of the company, to the same extent and with the same
priority as their pre-bankruptcy liens.

                    About Local Eateries Inc.  

Local Eateries, Inc., operating as Porter Road, is a
Nashville-based butcher shop, specializing in US pasture-raised
meats such as beef, pork, chicken, and other market products, all
free from hormones and antibiotics. The Company operates a retail
shop and provides nationwide delivery via its online platform,
offering premium, dry-aged meats to customers across the U.S.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Lead Case No. 25-01131) on March
17, 2025. In the petition signed by Chris Carter, co-founder, the
Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in assets and up to $50 million
in liabilities.

Judge Charles M Walker oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   R. Alex Payne, Esq.
   Dunham Hildebrand Payne Waldron, PLLC
   Tel: 629-777-6529
   Email: alex@dhnashville.com


LUMEE LLC: Court Issues Findings of Fact in Fernandez Case
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge William Thurman of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah amends its decision and makes additional findings
of facts and conclusions of law in the case captioned as LuMee LLC,
a Utah limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. Juan Fernandez, an
individual; and Monster Products LLC, a New Jersey limited
liability company, Defendants, Adversary Proceeding No. 21-02064
(Bankr. D. Utah.).

Before the Court is the post-trial remand and mandate from the
Tenth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. The BAP has mandated and
instructed the Court to further elaborate the factual basis for its
determination that Defendant Juan Fernandez, as the alter ego of
Products of Tomorrow Inc., is liable to Plaintiff LuMee LLC for
certain voidable transfers, notwithstanding certain substantive
defenses Mr. Fernandez has asserted. Specifically, the BAP has
mandated that this Court conduct a detailed analysis of the initial
transferee defenses asserted by Mr. Fernandez.

Mr. Fernandez made a number of arguments and proposed findings. But
only four arguments appear to discuss his initial transferee
defenses. These are:

   1.) POT gave reasonably equivalent value for the LuMee
Transfers;
   2.) the Transfers from LuMee to POT were not based on an actual
fraudulent intent;
   3.) none of the Transfers from LuMee to POT were for an
antecedent debt, per Utah Code Sec. 25-6-203(2); and
   4.) POT accepted the transfers without knowledge of LuMee's
insolvency and therefore in good faith.

The Court determines and finds that LuMee and POT were
sophisticated market participants who agreed on a negotiated price
for the goods to be supplied. It has sufficient evidence to support
a determination that the Transfers were made for reasonably
equivalent value and so finds.

Testimony given at trial supports the conclusion that LuMee gave
reasonably equivalent value for the products provided by POT. Mr.
Robert Pedersen, LuMee's CEO from the start of 2016 until the late
spring of 2018, testified that LuMee was able to routinely sell
POT's cell phone cases at a profit. Mr. Pedersen also testified
that he, and by extension LuMee, was generally satisfied with POT's
products. Mr. Pedersen explained that POT's Products were
productive and profitable for LuMee.

The Court finds and concludes that LuMee did not make the Transfers
to POT with an actual fraudulent intent and that there was no
avoidable transfer under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 548(a)(1)(A) or Utah Code
Sec. 25-6-202(1).

According to the Court, LuMee did not conceal its Transfers to POT,
LuMee did not retain control of the money it transferred to POT,
the Transfers were not comprised of substantially all of LuMee's
assets, and LuMee did not abscond after paying POT. Rather, the
Transfers were made in the regular course of LuMee's business
operations. LuMee did not conceal its business relationship with
POT or its business purpose of selling phone cases, the Court adds.


Mr. Fernandez's argument that the debts LuMee owed to POT were not
antecedent debts is unavailing, and the Court so finds that the
Transfers were for antecedent debts.

The evidence in the record demonstrates that Mr. Fernandez knew
that LuMee was insolvent on Sept. 17, 2018. Although there are
strong indicia that Mr. Fernandez knew about LuMee's actual or
imminent insolvency around the start of 2018 and perhaps even into
the final months of 2017 (notably the ballooning of debt owed to
POT, the mounting litigation costs in the patent infringement
lawsuits, the $245,000 loss posted at the end of 2017, and the
negative income reported as of June 30, 2018), these sources of
proof do not amount to a particular date on which to charge Mr.
Fernandez with constructive knowledge, the Court finds.

LuMee's admission on Sept. 17, 2018 that its liabilities were
greater than its assets and its sending the notice of such to POT
convinces the Court that Mr. Fernandez knew that LuMee
was insolvent on that day.

The Court finds that those Transfers and Distributions which
occurred prior to Sept. 17, 2018 are non-avoidable. These transfers
were received by POT in good faith, and POT provided reasonably
equivalent value for them. Conversely, the Transfers or
Distributions that were received by POT after Sept. 17, 2018 were
not received in good faith, as Mr. Fernandez knew or reasonably
should have known LuMee was insolvent. These transfers are
therefore avoidable under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 548(a)(1)(b), Utah Code
Sec. 26-6-203(2), and New Jersey Revised Statutes Sec. 25-2-27(b),
the Court concludes.

The Avoided Transfers are comprised of twelve (12) transfers, for a
total value of $72,565.82. The complained-of Distributions occurred
between April 8, 2016 and April 10, 2017, so no Distributions are
avoidable.

Having made the requisite findings of fact, this Court amends its
conclusions from its Memorandum Decision issued on Dec. 22, 2023 as
follows:

   1. LuMee was and still is a creditor of POT as a result of the
POT Default Judgment.
   2. Mr. Fernandez had knowledge or reasonably should have known
of LuMee's insolvency on Sept. 17, 2018.
   3. POT was insolvent during 2018 and 2019 and at least beginning
Sept. 17, 2018.
   4. The amount of personal spending from POT to Mr. Fernandez
during 2018 and 2019 is $102,635.91. This amount of money is not
subject to Mr. Fernandez's initial transferee defenses.
   5. Mr. Fernandez was the successor and mediate transferee from
POT for transfers occurring during 2018 and 2019. POT and Mr.
Fernandez were insiders of LuMee.
   6. During 2018 and 2019, Mr. Fernandez received $102,635.91.
This amount was transferred from POT to or for the benefit of Mr.
Fernandez during those years, and the Court determines that the
transfer of such funds constitute fraudulent transfers under Utah
and New Jersey laws, by constructive fraud.
   7. Mr. Fernandez was unjustly enriched by the transfers of
$102,635.91.
   8. The Plaintiff should be entitled to recover against Mr.
Fernandez for the transfers of $102,635.91 under § 550 and §
544(b)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, plus under the UVTA
adopted in New Jersey and/or Utah, N.J. Rev. Stat. § 25:2-27(b),
and Utah Code Ann. Sec. 25-6-203(2).
   9. Mr. Fernandez was and is the alter ego of POT and should be
liable for the debts of POT, including the POT Default Judgment,
but only to the amount of $72,565.82.
  10. Monster is not the alter ego of Mr. Fernandez or POT.
  11. Monster is the successor-in-interest to POT and should be
liable for the POT Default Judgement, but only to the amount of
$72,565.82.
  12. The POT Default Judgment, should be further amended to
include Mr. Fernandez and Monster as defendants and co-liable
parties with POT, but only to the amount of $72,565.82.
  13. No additional post-appeal attorney's fees are awarded.
  14. No additional post-appeal litigation costs are awarded.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=Mh4FIU from PacerMonitor.com.

                       About LuMee LLC

LuMee LLC -- https://www.lumee.com/ -- designs, manufactures and
sells illuminated smart phone cases and other mobile accessories.

LuMee filed its petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 19-24752) on June 28,
2019.  In the petition signed by Angela Shoemake, president and
chief operating officer, the Debtor was estimated to have $100,000
to $500,000 in assets and $4.2 million in liabilities.  The case is
assigned to Judge William T. Thurman.  Brian M. Rothschild, Esq.,
at Parsons Behle & Latimer, is the Debtor's counsel.


LYTTON VINEYARD: Claims to be Paid From Asset Sale Proceeds
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lytton Vineyard & Winery, L.P., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California a Disclosure Statement
describing Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation dated March 14, 2025.

The Debtor is a limited partnership consisting of 11 limited
partners and one general partner, Lytton Estates, LLC.

The real property on which the Debtor's restaurant and winery was
purchased in or around 2013 and consists of approximately 21 acres
with a vineyard and multiple buildings and improvements which have
been used as a restaurant, tasting room and wedding venue, located
at 34567 Rancho California Rd., Temecula, CA 92592.

Owing to its inability to obtain additional financing and a
negative cash flow, the Debtor first marketed itself for sale
beginning in 2023. Later in early 2024 after defaulting on the
first and second secured loan and trying to negotiate limited
forbearances, the Debtor signed a listing agreement pre-petition
with Berkshire Hathaway Homeservices California ("the Broker")
because the Broker has significant expertise in marketing wineries
and vineyards for sale.

On November 26, 2024, the Debtor entered into the PSA with T22 LLC
as the stalking horse buyer, subject to higher and/or better offers
at the Auction. Pursuant to the terms of the PSA, T22 LLC caused
$275,000.00 representing its earnest money deposit to be
transferred to the escrow company. T22 LLC waived all contingencies
and was ready to close.

At a sale hearing on December 18, 2024, this Court approved the
sale of substantially all assets of the Debtor and the sale order
was entered on January 2, 2025. As contemplated by the sale
documents $10,000,000 of the $12,000,000 purchase price was
allocated to the real property and $2,000,000 was allocated to the
Debtor's personal property.

On or about January 23, 2025, the sale closed. Upon closing the
Debtor received the $2,000,000 directly from the buyer and received
an additional $2,452,820.37 from escrow, representing net proceeds
from the sale of the real property.

Class 3 consists of all Allowed General Unsecured Claims. After the
Effective Date, all rights of the Debtor and the Estate to dispute,
object to, and/or litigate any Class 3 Claim (including all rights
of the Debtor and the Estate to seek to determine and/or
recharacterize some or all of a Class 3 Claim as equity and/or to
subordinate some or all of a Class 3 Claim to other Class 3 Claims
pursuant to, inter alia, Section 510) shall be transferred to the
Liquidating Trust to be pursued by the Liquidating Trustee under
the terms of this Plan and the Liquidating Trust Agreement.

Except to the extent that a holder of a Class 3 Claim has agreed to
a less favorable treatment of such Claim, and only to the extent
that any such Claim has not been paid in full before the Effective
Date, each holder of an Allowed Class 3 Claim shall receive, on a
Distribution Date, its Pro Rata Share of the Net Available Cash
from the Liquidating Trust, after full and final satisfaction of,
or release of, all (i) Secured Claims; (ii) Administrative Expense
Claims, (iii) Professional Compensation and Reimbursement Claims,
(iv) Priority Tax Claims, and (v) Priority Non-Tax Claims, in
accordance with the terms of the Plan and the Liquidating Trust
Agreement, as full and complete satisfaction of such holder's
Claims.

In the event any pro rata distributions are made to holders of
Allowed Class 3 claims, the Liquidating Trustee shall maintain a
reserve sufficient to pay the same pro rata distribution to holders
of disputed Class 3 Claims (based on the claim amounts set forth in
such creditors' filed proofs of claim or, if applicable, the claim
amounts allowed pursuant to subsequent Court order or settlement by
the parties).

In the event all or any portion of a Class 3 Claim is finally
determined to be subordinated to other Class 3 General Unsecured
Claims, such Claim or portion of such Claim shall be paid from the
Net Available Cash but only after other allowed Class 3 Claims that
have not been subordinated have been paid in full. The treatment
provided herein shall be in full satisfaction of the holders of
Allowed Claims in Class 3. Class 3 is impaired and entitled to vote
on the Plan.

Class 5 consists of the Debtor's General Partner(s). After the
Effective Date, all rights of Class 5 general partner(s) shall be
canceled. As such, Class 5 Holders of General Partner Interests
shall receive nothing under the Plan.

On the Effective Date, the Liquidating Trust shall be created
pursuant to the Liquidating Trust Agreement, which shall be
executed on behalf of the Debtor by the CEO and by the Liquidating
Trustee, who shall accept the appointment. The Liquidating Trust
shall not terminate upon the death or incapacity of the Liquidating
Trustee and shall continue until its termination in accordance with
the terms of this Plan and the Liquidating Trust Agreement.

Pursuant to the Plan, all of assets of the Debtor and its Estate
are being transferred to the Liquidating Trust to be liquidated and
distributed to the Liquidating Trust's beneficiaries. Therefore,
the Plan satisfies the feasibility requirement of Section
1129(a)(11).  

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 14, 2025
is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=szblBo from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The firm can be reached through:

     M. Douglas Flahaut, Esq.
     Dylan J. Yamamoto, Esq.
     Echo Park Legal, APC
     1542 Duane St
     Los Angeles, CA 90026-1834
     Phone: (310) 709-0658
     Email: df@echoparklegal.com

                  About Lytton Vineyard & Winery L.P.

Lytton Vineyard and Winery, LP operates a restaurant and winery in
Temecula Valley.

Lytton sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 24-11748) on October 18, 2024,
with $10 million to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.
Maribeth Levine, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Victoria S. Kaufman oversees the case.

M. Douglas Flahaut, Esq., at Echo Park Legal, APC, is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


MAINE BOULEVARD: Seeks Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Florida
-------------------------------------------------------
On April 7, 2025, Maine Boulevard II LLC filed Chapter 11
protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Florida. According to court filing, the
Debtor reports $25,391,669 in debt owed to 1 and 49 creditors.
The petition states funds will be available to unsecured
creditors.

           About Maine Boulevard II LLC  

Maine Boulevard II LLC is a single-asset real estate company that
holds a special warranty deed for the property located at 600 E
Geneva St. The value of the Debtor's interest in the property is
$32.75 million, based on comparable sales.

Maine Boulevard II LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 25-02002) on April 7,
2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports total assets of
$32,750,000 and total liabilities of $25,391,669.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Grace E. Robson handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Jonathan M. Sykes, Esq. at NARDELLA &
NARDELLA, PLLC.


MARIN SOFTWARE: Board OKs Amended Severance Agreements
------------------------------------------------------
Marin Software Incorporated disclosed in a Form 8-K Report filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that the Board of
Directors approved the Company's entry into an amended and restated
change in control and severance agreement with each of the
Company's named executive officers, Christopher Lien, Robert Bertz,
and Wister Walcott, effective as of March 24, 2025, which amends
and supersedes each NEO's Change in Control and Severance Agreement
(or in the case of Mr. Bertz, his Amended and Restated Change in
Control and Severance Agreement), which are described in the
Company's proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 5, 2024 under the section "Executive
Compensation--Potential Payments upon Employment Termination and
Change in Control Events."

Each Amended and Restated Severance Agreement provides that in the
event of the Company terminating such NEO without Cause or such NEO
voluntarily resigning his employment for Good Reason, in either
case not in connection with a Change in Control, then such NEO
shall be entitled to the following:

     * In the case of Mr. Lien, 4.5 months of his then-current
monthly base salary, 37.5% of his annual target bonus in effect
prior to the Qualifying Termination, and payment or reimbursement
of the Company's portion of Mr. Lien's COBRA premiums for the
earlier of:

          (i) 4.5 months,
         (ii) the date Mr. Lien is eligible for coverage under
another medical insurance plan, and
        (iii) the date the Company no longer offers health
insurance to its active employees.

     * In the case of Messrs. Bertz and Walcott, 3 months of their
then-current monthly base salary, 25% of their applicable annual
target bonus in effect prior to the Qualifying Termination, and
payment or reimbursement of the Company's portion of their
respective COBRA premiums for the earlier of:

          (i) 3 months,
         (ii) the date such NEO is eligible for coverage under
another medical insurance plan, and
        (iii) the date the Company no longer offers health
insurance to its active employees.

Additionally, the definition of "CIC Qualifying Termination" has
been revised such that a Separation in connection with the
consummation of a Change in Control, including a Separation made at
the request of the prospective acquirer whose proposed acquisition
would constitute a Change in Control upon its completion, or within
5 months prior to, or 12 months following, the consummation of a
Change in Control resulting from:

     (A) the Company or its successor terminating the NEO's
employment for any reason other than Cause or
     (B) the NEO voluntarily resigning his employment for Good
Reason. Except as noted, the benefits provided in connection with a
CIC Qualifying Termination are substantially similar to those that
would have been available to each NEO under their respective prior
Change in Control and Severance Agreements.

                      About Marin Software

Marin Software Incorporated is a provider of digital marketing
solutions for search, social, and eCommerce advertising channels,
offered as a unified SaaS, advertising management platform for
performance-driven advertisers and agencies. The Company's platform
is an analytics, workflow, and optimization solution for marketing
professionals, enabling them to maximize the performance of their
digital advertising spend. The Company markets and sells its
solutions to advertisers directly and through leading advertising
agencies, and its customers collectively manage billions of dollars
in advertising spend on its platform globally across a wide range
of industries.

San Jose, California-based Grant Thornton LLP, the Company's
auditor since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Feb. 23, 2024, citing that the Company incurred a net
loss of $22 million during the year ended Dec. 31, 2023, and as of
that date, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately
$344 million and negative operating cash flows. These conditions,
along with other matters, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Marin Software incurred a net loss of $22 million during the year
ended December 31, 2023.


MAT TRANSPORT: Hires I&S Tax Service LLC as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------
Mat Transport, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Arizona to employ I&S Tax Service LLC as
accountant.

The firm will assist in the preparation of monthly operating
reports and to help with general accounting matters during the
pendency of the Bankruptcy Case, including, but not limited to,
general ledger management, preparation of financial documents, and
cash management.

The firm will be paid at the rate of $200.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Igor Gojkovic, a partner at I&S Tax Service LLC, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Igor Gojkovic
     I&S Tax Service LLC
     23425 N. 39th Drive, Suite 107
     Glendale, AZ 85310
     Tel: (602) 582-2115
     Email: igojkovic10gmail.com

              About Mat Transport, Inc.

Mat Transport, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 24-05932) on July 22,
2024. In the petition signed by Marko Tomovic, president, the
Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Madeleine C. Wanslee oversees the case.

D. Lamar Hawkins, Esq., at Guidant Law, PLC, serves as the Debtor's
counsel.


MIRAMAR TOWNHOMES: Unsecured Claims Under $1K to Recover 40%
------------------------------------------------------------
Miramar Townhomes SWNG 2 LLC and its affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas a Joint
Disclosure Statement in support of Plan of Reorganization dated
March 14, 2025.

The Debtors s are each special purpose entities which own separate
multi-family properties. The Debtors' own apartment and townhome
complexes located in Houston, Texas and share common, indirect
ownership.

MTS2 Debtor is Texas limited liability company, formed in November
2021, for the sole purpose of acquiring and owning the multifamily
residential real property commonly known as "Miramar Townhomes",
located at 2380 Bering, Houston, Harris County, Texas ("MTS2
Property"). Miramar Townhomes SWNG GP, LLC, a Texas limited
liability company, owns a 35% interest in MTS2 Debtor and is its
sole manager. Miramar Townhomes SWNG LP, LLC, a Texas limited
liability company, owns the remaining 65% interest in MTS2 Debtor.

MTS2 Debtor, AST Debtors, and Toro Debtor have operated their
respective businesses as Debtors-in-Possession since the Petition
Date and have not made any extraordinary disposition or acquisition
of assets since that date.

Class 4A consists of MTS2 Debtor's General Unsecured ($1,000 or
Less). Approximately $5,567 in general unsecured claims less than
$1,000 have been asserted through March 11, 2025. This Class shall
be paid with 45 days of the Effective Date. This Class will receive
a distribution of 40% of their allowed claims.

Class 4B consists of AST Debtors' General Unsecured ($1,000 or
Less). Approximately $6,541 in general unsecured claims less than
$1,000 have been asserted through March 11, 2025. This Class shall
be paid with 45 days of the Effective Date. This Class will receive
a distribution of 40% of their allowed claims.

Class 4C consists of Toro Debtor's General Unsecured ($1,000 or
Less). Approximately $8,615 in general unsecured claims less than
$1,000 have been asserted through March 11, 2025. This Class shall
be paid with 45 days of the Effective Date. This Class will receive
a distribution of 40% of their allowed claims.

Class 5A consists of MTS2 Debtor's General Unsecured Claims
(Greater than $1,000). Approximately $209,267 in general unsecured
claims greater than $1,000 have been asserted through March 11,
2025. This Class shall be paid in quarterly payment over a period
of twenty (20) quarters. This Class will receive a distribution of
up to 33.4% of their allowed claims.

Class 5B consists of AST Debtors' General Unsecured Claims (Greater
than $1,000). Approximately $708,138.76 in general unsecured claims
greater than $1,000 have been asserted through March 11, 2025. This
Class shall be paid in quarterly payment over a period of twenty
quarters. This Class will receive a distribution of up to 42.4% of
their allowed claims.

Class 5C consists of Toro Debtor's General Unsecured Claims
(Greater than $1,000). Approximately $459,474.67 in general
unsecured claims greater than $1,000 have been asserted through
March 11, 2025. This Class shall be paid in quarterly payment over
a period of twenty quarters. This Class will receive a distribution
of 54.4% of their allowed claims.

The source of funds to achieve consummation of and carry out the
Plan shall be from (i) Cash on hand; (ii) Debtor's Net Income,
(iii) Net Sale Proceeds or Loan Proceeds; (iii) Net Litigation
Proceeds and (iv) Capital Funding Reserve which are to be utilized
to satisfy Claims in the manner and order of priority in Articles
3, 4 and 6 of the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Joint Disclosure Statement dated March 14,
2025 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=z9HZ7C from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtors' Counsel:        

                         Melissa A. Haselden, Esq.
                         Elyse M. Farrow, Esq.
                         HASELDEN FARROW PLLC
                         708 Main Street
                         10th Floor
                         Houston, Texas 77002
                         Tel: (832) 819-1149
                         Email: MHaselden@HaseldenFarrow.com

                    About Miramar Townhomes SWNG 2

Miramar Townhomes SWNG 2, LLC is owned by Miramar Townhomes SWNG
GP, LLC and Miramar Townhomes LP SWNG, LLC. Avenue SWNG TIC, 1 and
Avenue SWNG TIC, 2 are both owned by The Avenue SWNG, LLC while
Toro Place, LLC is owned by Toro Place Holdings, LLC.

Miramar owns the Miramar Townhomes located at 2380 Bering Drive,
Houston, Texas, while Toro owns the Toro Place Apartments located
at 12101 Fondren Road, Houston, Texas. The Avenue SWNG TIC
companies own The Avenue Apartments located at 5050 Yale Street,
Houston, Texas.

On November 27, 2024, the Debtors filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 24-90608). At the time of the
filing, each Debtor reported $10 million to $50 million in assets
and liabilities.

Judge Christopher M. Lopez handles the cases.

The Debtors tapped Melissa A. Haselden, Esq., at Haselden Farrow,
PLLC as bankruptcy counsel and O'ConnorWechsler, PLLC as litigation
counsel.


MMK FAMILY: Gets Final OK to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------
MMK Family Investments, Inc. received final approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine to use cash collateral.

The final order authorized the company to use cash collateral to
pay the expenses set forth in its budget, with a 125% cap on
expenditures.

The budget projects total cash disbursements of $256,033 for the
period from Feb. 23 to May 24.

Cornerstone Bank, a pre-bankruptcy lienholder, and its successors
and assigns including Coastal States Bank may assert an interest in
the cash collateral. the bank will be granted liens on all assets
of the company and its estate other than the proceeds of any
avoidance actions as protection for the use of its cash
collateral.

In addition, Cornerstone Bank will continue to hold liens, rights
as assignee and security interests in all property of MMK Family.

In case these liens are insufficient to protect Cornerstone Bank,
the lienholder will be granted an allowed administrative claim
against the company.

                  About MMMK Family Investments

MMK Family Investments, Inc. operates a sandwich shop as franchisee
of Firehouse Subs, an international brand of the Restaurant Brands
International Group.

MMK Family filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Maine Case No.
25-20020) on February 4, 2025, listing up to $100,000 in assets and
up to $1 million in liabilities. Michael Koman, president of MMK
Family, signed the petition.

Judge Michael A. Fagone oversees the case.

The Debtor is Represented By:

   Adam R. Prescott, Esq.
   Bernstein Shur Sawyer & Nelson, PA
   Tel: 207-228-7145
   Email: aprescott@bernsteinshur.com


MOBIVITY HOLDINGS: Narrows Net Loss of $10.23 Million in 2024
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mobivity Holdings Corp. reported a reduced net loss of $10.23
million on revenues of $1.14 million for the year ended Dec. 31,
2024, according to its recently filed Form 10-K with the SEC.  This
compares to a net loss of $12.06 million on revenues of $1.07
million for the prior year ended Dec. 31, 2023.

As of Dec. 31, 2024, the Company had $2.56 million in total assets,
$19.72 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $17.16 million.  The Company had $1.26 million of cash
as of Dec. 31, 2024.  The Company used $6.1 million of cash in its
operating activities during 2024.  The Company raised $6.9 million
in cash Convertible Notes issued during 2024.

Additional cash from convertible notes, combined with expected
operational cash flow, may not be sufficient to fund the Company's
12-month operating plan, the Company stated.  It also noted that
there can be no assurance significant additional capital will not
be required within that period.

According to Mobivity, it may need to raise additional capital to
sustain operations if existing cash reserves fall short.  The
Company plans to issue additional convertible notes if necessary
and noted that it currently has $126,875 available on its existing
line of credit.  However, Mobivity warned that further financing
may be required beyond that point if the Company is unable to
achieve profitability.  Failure to secure the necessary funding
could lead to curtailment of operations or potentially a sale or
liquidation of its assets.  The Company further cautioned that
future efforts to raise capital could significantly dilute the
holdings of existing shareholders.

In its report dated April 7, 2025, the Company's auditor M&K CPAS,
PLLC, issued a "going concern" qualification citing that the
Company has suffered net losses from operations and has a net
capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.

As indicated in the filing, the Company's ability to remain
operational will depend on generating profitable operations in the
future and/or obtaining sufficient financing to meet its
obligations and repay liabilities as they come due.  To address
these financial challenges, Mobivity said it plans to fund
operating costs over the next twelve months through proceeds from
the sale of securities and revenue from operations.

The full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1447380/000164117225002942/form10-k.htm

                        About Mobivity Holdings

Mobivity Holdings Corp. develops and operates proprietary platforms
that enable brands and enterprises to run data-driven marketing
campaigns at both national and local levels.  The Company's
flagship product, Recurrency, is a self-service SaaS platform that
empowers businesses to optimize promotions, media, and marketing
spend.  On average, Recurrency delivers a 13% increase in guest
spend and a 26% improvement in visit frequency—resulting in a 10X
Return on Marketing Spend.  In other words, for every dollar
invested, retailers using Recurrency generate approximately ten
dollars in incremental revenue.


MOONEY HOUSE: Loses Bid to Extend Plan Exclusivity Period
---------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable David S. Jones of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York denied Mooney House LLC and
144 Division LLC's motion to extend the exclusivity period for
filing a Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement pursuant to 11
U.S.C. Sec. 1121(d)(1).

Mooney House and 144 Division are both owned by Ross Morgan. Mooney
House owns a property located at 18 Bowery New York, New York
10013, while 144 Division previously owned the property located at
38 Canal Street, New York, New York 10002. In 2016, Antoni
Fuczynski sued 144 Division for injuries he sustained during a
renovation project on the property. Shortly after, Mr. Fuczynski
sued Mooney House for allegedly receiving fraudulent transfers from
144 Division, through a mortgage refinance and subsequent sale
transaction. The Debtors filed for bankruptcy on July 26, 2024,
before the Prepetition Litigations could be resolved. Debtors'
property is not encumbered by any mortgage or other secured
financing.

On Nov. 20, 2024, the Debtors filed a motion to extend the Plan and
Solicitation Periods. The Court entered an order, dated Dec. 18,
2024, granting the Debtors' motion and extending the Plan
Exclusivity Period from Nov. 23, 2024, to Feb. 14, 2025, and the
Solicitation Exclusivity Period from Jan. 22, 2025, to April 14,
2025. On Feb. 13, 2025, the Debtors filed the instant motion
seeking a second extension of the exclusivity periods.

The Debtors now seeks to further extend the Plan Exclusivity Period
from Feb. 14, 2025, to June 13, 2025, and the Solicitation
Exclusivity Period from April 14, 2025, to Aug. 12, 2025. Mr.
Fuczynski objects, arguing that Debtors have made insufficient
progress to resolving his entitlements or proceeding with a viable
plan.

In this case, the Debtors argue that cause exists under Sec.
1121(d)(1) for the following reasons:

   (i) the accountants require additional time to finalize their
findings and present them to the Debtors' primary unsecured
creditor, Mr.Fuczynski, to facilitate anticipated settlement
discussions and enable the formulation of a confirmable Chapter 11
plan;
  (ii) resolving the Mr. Fuczynski's claim through settlement will
reduce litigation costs;
(iii) the Debtors' estate benefits from extending the Exclusive
Periods until the settlement negotiations with Mr. Fuczynski is
reached as opposed to spending precious resources proposing a
Chapter 11 plan which isn't ripe for confirmation or effectuation;
and
  (iv) terminating the Exclusivity Periods will materially affect
the Debtors' and its Accountants' ability to continue its efforts.

The Court finds the Debtors have failed to establish that there is
sufficient cause to extend the Plan and Solicitation Exclusivity
Periods.

The Debtors have repeatedly argued that negotiating a settlement
with Mr. Fuczynski is the most cost-effective resolution. To
facilitate such settlement, the Debtors' engaged accountants to
conduct an analysis of the alleged fraudulent transfers.  Upon
completion of the months-long financial analysis, the parties, at
the March 13 hearing, expressed a willingness to move forward with
the settlement negotiations. However, on March 27, despite being
urged by the Court to try to promptly resolve their dispute, Mr.
Fuczynski's counsel informed the Court that the parties have failed
to reach an agreement. At this point, the Debtors have had over
eight months to negotiate a workable plan that turns entirely or
nearly so on resolving Mr. Fuczynski's entitlements, and a further
extension at this point is unlikely to revive meaningful settlement
talks between the parties.

The Court concludes there is no evidence of the Debtors' intention
or ability to promptly propose a viable plan.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=u14QJP from PacerMonitor.com.

Counsel for Antoni Fuczynski:

Rocco A. Cavaliere, Esq.
TARTER KRINSKY & DROGIN LLP
1350 Broadway, 11th Floor
New York, NY 10018
E-mail: rcavaliere@tarterkrinsky.com

Counsel for Debtors:

Dawn Kirby, Esq.
KIRBY AISNER & CURLEY LLP
700 Post Road, Suite 237
Scarsdale, NY 10583
E-mail: dkirby@kacllp.com

                       About Mooney House

Mooney House, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 24-11294) on July
26, 2024, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge David S. Jones oversees the case.

Dawn Kirby, Esq., at Kirby Aisner & Curley, LLP, serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


ORIGINAL MOWBRAY'S: Unsecured Creditors to Split $16M in Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Original Mowbray's Tree Service Inc. filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California a
Disclosure Statement describing Chapter 11 Plan dated March 14,
2025.

Established in 1972 by Gloria and John Mowbray (the "Founders"),
Mowbray's has been a cornerstone in California for providing
vegetation management services for over 50 years.

Mowbray's began as a modest venture and has grown into a resilient
company, dedicated to safeguarding communities and the environment.
Mowbray's continues to be a family owned and operated business, is
a member of WMBE (Women and Minority Business Enterprise), and is
committed to providing its client-partners with the safest and most
efficient solution to their vegetation management needs.

The Plan is a reorganizing plan that saves the Debtor's business
and the jobs of its employees. The Plan enables the Debtor to
restructure its obligations and continue operations, providing
essential vegetation management services and disaster relief
assistance to communities coast to coast.

The Plan also marshals significant value from all Estate assets for
the benefit of creditors. Through the Debtor's ongoing operations,
the Plan proposes to pay substantial value to the Holders of
Allowed Claims, an amount that exceeds $36,000,000 over the term of
the Plan.

The Plan contains fair and equitable treatment for all Classes of
creditors. Each Holder of an Allowed Secured Claim will be paid in
full. In many respects, the Plan adopts the contractual repayment
terms that give rise to the Secured Claims. The Holders of Allowed
General Unsecured Claims will receive a pro rata share of the
$15,674,000 GUC Payment Amount. The GUC Payment Amount is projected
to be paid by the Reorganized Debtor within nine years following
the Effective Date and will be paid with interest.

In addition, the Plan vests certain potential claims of the Estate,
i.e., Insider Avoidance Actions and Loan Causes of Action, in a
Plan Trust for the Plan Trustee to investigate and, if appropriate,
pursue. The Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims will
receive a pro rata share of any Net Recoveries from such actions.
Distributions on account of Disputed Claims will be reserved and
paid upon allowance.

The Reorganized Debtor's post-Effective Date operating cash flow
includes significant value from its affiliates. The pre-petition
loan owing from the Debtor's wholly-owned subsidiary, Pino Tree
Service, Inc. ("PTS"), will be paid in full less than one year
after the Effective Date. The Reorganized Debtor is projected to
receive management fees and equipment rent from PTS of nearly $10.8
million per year, plus annual distributions.

The projected annual distributions collectively exceed $14.5
million over the term of the Plan. As such, the Reorganized Debtor
is receiving 100% of the economic benefit of PTS and essentially
all of its excess cash flow during the term of the Plan. In
addition, the Reorganized Debtor is projected to receive over
$700,000 annually from Phoenix Traffic Management, Inc. ("PTM"), on
account of management fees and equipment rent.

Class 16 consists of the General Unsecured Claims. On the Effective
Date, each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim shall
receive a pro rata share of the beneficial interests in the Plan
Trust in full satisfaction, settlement, discharge, and release of,
and in exchange for, such Claim, which shall entitle such Holder to
his, her, or its Pro Rata Distribution of the Available Trust
Proceeds.

The Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims will receive Pro
Rata Distributions from Available Trust Proceeds as follows: On
each Quarterly Distribution Date until the Available Trust Proceeds
are exhausted or the term of the Plan Trust ends, each Holder of an
Allowed General Unsecured Claim shall receive a Pro Rata
Distribution from any Available Trust Proceeds. The Reorganized
Debtor will fund the GUC Payment Amount to the Plan Trust. This
Class is impaired.

On the Effective Date, Robin Mowbray shall retain all existing
Equity Interests in the Debtor on account of the New Value
Contribution or, alternatively, in the event a Winning Bid that is
not held by Robin Mowbray, such Equity Interests will be
transferred to the Winning Bidder with such Winning Bid.

The payments under the Plan by the Reorganized Debtor will be
funded from the Reorganized Debtor's operations. As reflected in
the Projections, the Distributions to the Holders of Secured Claims
will be paid by the Reorganized Debtor from its post Effective Date
cash flow.

Distributions to the Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims
will be made from the Plan Trust. The Holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims will receive a Pro Rata Distribution of Available
Trust Proceeds. Available Trust Proceeds are compromised of the GUC
Payment Amount and any Net Recoveries. The Reorganized Debtor will
fund the GUC Payment Amount from its post-Effective Date
operations.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 14, 2025
is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=NKpMLt from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Original Mowbray's Tree Service, Inc., is represented by:

     Robert S Marticell, Esq.
     Michael L. Simon, Esq.
     RAINES FELDMAN LITTRELL LLP
     3200 Park Center Drive, Suite 250
     Costa Mesa, CA 92626
     Telephone: (310) 440-4100
     Facsimile: (310) 499-4877     
     Email: rmarticello@raineslaw.com

              About The Original Mowbray's Tree Service

Original Mowbray's Tree Service Inc., doing business as Mowbray's
Tree Service, is a family owned and operated business committed to
providing its client-partners with solution to their vegetation
management needs. It offers hazard tree mitigation, integrated
vegetation management, mechanized tree removal, emergency response,
crane services, and green waste & debris management.

Original Mowbray's Tree Service sought relief under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 24-12674) on
Oct. 18, 2024, with $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities. Brian Weiss, chief restructuring officer, signed the
petition.

Judge Theodor Albert oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Raines Feldman Littrell, LLP as general
bankruptcy counsel; Force Ten Partners, LLC as restructuring
advisor; and Grobstein Teeple, LLP as financial advisor.


PHOENIX SWIMMING: Court Dismisses Involuntary Chapter 11 Petition
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Chief Judge Kimberly Bacher of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of New Hampshire will dismiss the involuntary
chapter 11 petition filed by creditor Stephen Van Der Beken against
Phoenix Swimming, LLC.

Matthew Williams formed Phoenix in August 2010 to provide swim
coaching services. Williams is Phoenix's sole member, owner, and
manager. Phoenix runs a competitive swim team, which currently has
sixty-two swimmers. Phoenix does not own any real estate but
instead rents pool facilities at which the Alleged Debtor's coaches
train swimmers and conduct swim meets. Its assets consist of
swimming blocks, touch pads, a timing system, dry land equipment,
laptops, its coaching staff and swimmers, and the company's income
stream and goodwill. Swimmers pay monthly or quarterly tuition,
some pay for private lessons, and they also pay member dues and
league fees. Phoenix's other source of income is fees from hosting
swim meets.

Williams and Van Der Beken have known each other for many years.
Van Der Beken coached Williams when Williams was a high school
swimmer. Thereafter the two continued their relationship as they
both coached swim teams. In 2016, they entered into an agreement
whereby Williams, in his individual capacity, purchased a 50%
ownership interest in Van Der Beken's swim team business.

In 2021, Van Der Beken sued Williams and Phoenix in the
Hillsborough Superior Court Northern District for breach of
contract, unjust enrichment, and quantum meruit. In June 2023, Van
Der Beken obtained a writ of attachment and trustee process against
Williams and the Alleged Debtor with respect to property held by
Bank of America.

After a three-day trial, the State Court found in favor of Van Der
Beken, issuing an order on June 2, 2024, requiring Williams to pay
Van Der Beken $243,212.00 in damages plus costs. The Judgment
further provided that Phoenix would be responsible for a subset of
those damages if they are not paid by Williams. In addition, on
June 20, 2024, the State Court awarded Van Der Beken attorney's
fees and costs totaling $58,603.48. Williams was ordered to pay Van
Der Beken's attorney's fees and costs within sixty days, so by Aug.
19, 2024. When Williams failed to do so by that deadline, Van Der
Beken sought further relief in State Court in a motion filed on
August 23, 2024, asking the State Court to find Williams and
Phoenix in contempt of the Fee Award.

The State Court held a hearing on Oct. 25, 2024, and Williams
represented through counsel that he lacked funds to pay either the
Judgment or the Fee Award.

On Jan. 30, 2025, Van Der Beken filed the Involuntary Petition in
this Court. In it, he alleged that the debtor is generally not
paying its debts as they become due, unless they are in the subject
of a bona fide dispute as to liability or amount. He described his
claim against the Alleged Debtor as consisting of court ordered
damages of $243,212.00, attorney's fees of $58,603.00, interest of
$32,673.00, plus attorney's fees, interest, and costs accruing
since the State Court orders. The Petitioning Creditor also filed a
declaration in support of the Involuntary Petition wherein he
stated that Phoenix has less than 12 creditors. Van Der Beken
further stated that he holds a bona fide, non-contingent and
indisputable, liquidated claim against Phoenix in excess of
$329,238 and that he does not believe that he holds any perfected
liens against Phoenix's property.

Before the evidentiary hearing, the Alleged Debtor filed an answer
and opposition to the Involuntary Petition signed by counsel. In
it, the Alleged Debtor stated that it is generally paying its debts
as they come due, noting that it is paying the Judgment in
accordance with the Payment Order and that such payments are
current. The Alleged Debtor stated it has one other debt, an
American Express account on which it owed approximately $7,000.00.
Phoenix argued that the Involuntary Petition was filed in bad
faith, as a substitute for ordinary debt collection, and that the
Petitioning Creditor has available to him state law remedies to
enforce or modify enforcement of the Judgment.

The Court conducted a trial on March 18, 2025, pursuant to 11
U.S.C. Sec. 303 to determine the validity of the Involuntary
Petition.

The Court finds that the Petitioning Creditor satisfied the
requirements of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 303(b)(2) and had standing to file
the Involuntary Petition.

The Court concludes that the Alleged Debtor is generally paying its
debts as they become due, and for that reason, will dismiss the
Involuntary Petition.

Alternatively, the Court exercises its discretion to abstain as the
interests of the Alleged Debtor and creditors would be best served
by dismissal.

The Court declines to grant judgment against the Petitioning
Creditor and in favor of the Alleged Debtor for costs, attorney's
fees, or damages as permitted by 11 U.S.C.  Sec. 303(i).

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=XyBGNp PacerMonitor.com.

Phoenix Swimming, LLC's creditor filed a Chapter 11 involuntary
petition against the company (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 25-10052) on
January 30, 2025. The petitioning creditor is Stephen Van Der
Beken.

The petitioners' counsel is Williams S. Gannon, Esq. at Williams S.
Gannon PLLC.


PREDICTIVE ONCOLOGY: Posts $12.66M 2024 Loss Amid Ongoing Struggles
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Predictive Oncology Inc. reported a net loss of $12.66 million on
just $1.62 million in revenue for the year ending Dec. 31, 2024,
according to its latest annual filing with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.  The loss narrowed from $13.98 million in
2023, while revenue declined slightly from $1.63 million -- a
year-over-year drop of $3,880.

The Company has never turned a profit since its founding and
reported an accumulated deficit of $180.4 million as of Dec. 31,
2024 -- up from $167.8 million the year before.  It continues to
rely on a mix of debt and equity financing to fund its operations.

In recent years, the Company has shifted its focus, investing in
early-stage ventures and expanding its portfolio through
acquisitions.  The Company bought Helomics Corporation in 2019,
acquired the assets of three other businesses in 2020, and
purchased zPREDICTA Inc. in 2021 -- moves that have significantly
increased its capital requirements.

The Company said future cash needs and the adequacy of available
resources are closely tied to the Company's ability to generate
revenue and achieve profitability within its oncology business
based in Pittsburgh, as well as secure additional financing to
support ongoing business plans.

Given current projections, it is not expected that operating
revenues will be sufficient to sustain operations in the near
future.  For the year ended Dec. 31, 2024, negative cash flows from
continuing operations totaled $10,974,568.

In its annual report, the Company acknowledged the difficulty of
forecasting future performance, particularly given its limited
operating history in the drug discovery segment and the strategic
shift initiated in 2017.  It cautioned that period-to-period
comparisons of results may not be reliable indicators of future
outcomes.

As of Dec. 31, 2024, the Company had $4.97 million in total assets,
$5.18 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $202,610.

In its report dated March 31, 2025, the Company's auditor, KPMG
LLP, issued a "going concern" qualification citing that the Company
has incurred recurring losses from operations and has an
accumulated deficit that raises substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.

Despite efforts to improve cash flows by increasing revenues and
reducing expenses, management noted that there is no assurance
these measures will improve operating margin sufficiently or
profitability in the near term.

The complete text of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1446159/000117184325001863/poai20241231_10k.htm

                        About Predictive Oncology

Predictive Oncology Inc., headquartered in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, is a science- and knowledge-driven company that
leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to advance the discovery and
development of optimal cancer therapies.  By combining AI with a
proprietary biobank of over 150,000 tumor samples, categorized by
tumor type, the Company delivers actionable insights into drug
compounds, enhancing the drug discovery process and increasing the
likelihood of clinical success.  Predictive Oncology offers a
comprehensive suite of solutions that support oncology drug
development from early discovery through to clinical trials,
ultimately aiming to improve treatment effectiveness and patient
outcomes.


PRIME ELECTRICAL: Gets OK to Use Cash Collateral Until June 5
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida,
Orlando Division, issued a third preliminary order extending Prime
Electrical Services, LLC's authority to use cash collateral through
June 5.

The order authorized the company to use cash collateral to pay its
expenses, including payments of U.S. trustee quarterly fees, and
those expenses set forth in its budget, with a 10% variance for
each line item.

The budget projects net operational expenses of $31,450 for March,
April and May.

Secured creditors were granted a post-petition lien on cash
collateral to the same extent and with the same validity and
priority as their pre-bankruptcy liens.

The next hearing is scheduled for June 5.

                  About Prime Electrical Services

Prime Electrical Services, LLC manufactures relays and industrial
controls. It offers engineering, procurement, fabrication, and
field construction services for the drilling, industrial, heat
trace, production, and petrochemical industries. The company serves
customers in the United States.

Prime Electrical Services sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-06663) on
December 8, 2024, with total assets of $256,996 and total
liabilities of $5,419,312. Camell D. Williams, manager of Prime
Electrical Services, signed the petition.

Judge Tiffany P. Geyer handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

     Jeffrey S. Ainsworth, Esq.
     BransonLaw, PLLC
     1501 E. Concord Street
     Orlando, FL 32803
     Tel: 407-894-6834
     Email: jeff@bransonlaw.com


PUBLISHERS CLEARING: Files for Chap. 11 in S.D.N.Y. to Restructure
------------------------------------------------------------------
Publishers Clearing House announced on April 9, 2025, that it has
filed a voluntary petition for chapter 11 relief in the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
reorganize the Company's capital structure and improve its
long-term growth trajectory. Specifically, the Company will utilize
the financial restructuring process to finalize the shift away from
its legacy direct mail and retail merchandise and magazine
subscription businesses and focus on its transformation to a pure
digital advertising business that offers free-to-play entertainment
experiences through a variety of web and app experiences, powered
by a chance to win.

"Today marks a crucial development in our transition to a digital
advertising-supported entertainment company," said Andy Goldberg,
Chief Executive Officer. "By taking this step, we are breaking free
from the past financial constraints of our legacy direct mail and
online retail merchandise and magazine subscription operating
model, and taking action to establish a strong foundation for our
future -- enabling PCH to unlock the full potential of our digital
advertising and consumer insights business. Importantly, our
world-renowned sweepstakes will continue to be a cornerstone of our
experiences, and we intend to continue offering free-to-play
entertainment and awarding prizes in the ordinary course of
business during and after this process to uphold the historic
legacy of Publishers Clearing House."

Throughout the process, PCH is committed to operating in a
business-as-usual manner in order to continue delivering for its
valued customers, partners, clients, and employees with excellence.
Importantly, PCH's renowned Prize Patrol team expects to continue
awarding prizes to sweepstakes winners across the country with the
famous big check, champagne and flowers that have endeared the
brand to consumers for over 50 years. In fact just this week, the
Company surprised a lucky winner with a $50,000 award and the Prize
Patrol will be on the road later this week to find their latest
weekly $10,000 winner.

To fund operations without disruption, the Company has lined up
debtor-in-possession financing from Prestige Capital. Upon court
approval, PCH anticipates the DIP financing will provide liquidity
to support operations during the reorganization process.

As part of this process, PCH has engaged SSG Advisors to explore a
variety of strategic options moving forward, including the
potential sale of its digital assets or a capital infusion from a
financial partner that will help fund the Company's longer-term
business plan going forward.

Additional information is available through the Company's claims
agent, Omni Agent Solutions' website at
https://omniagentsolutions.com/PCH. Any questions about the process
can be addressed to PCHInquiries@Omniagnt.com or via phone to
888-710-5634 (US & Canada toll free) and 818-381-4518
(International).

Advisors

Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP is serving as
legal advisor, William H. Henrich and Laurence Sax from Getzler
Henrich & Associates LLC are serving as Co-Chief Restructuring
Officers, SSG Capital Advisors, LLC, is serving as investment
banker, and C Street Advisory Group is serving as strategic
communications advisor to the Company.

About Publishers Clearing House

Publishers Clearing House (PCH) is a leading direct-to-consumer
company offering free-to-play digital entertainment. Through its
PCH/Media division, PCH helps brands and advertisers connect with
qualified, responsive audiences across its extensive chance-to-win
gaming platforms. PCH has evolved into a multi-channel media
company, combining digital entertainment, direct-to-consumer
marketing, and commerce to create compelling experiences for users
and brands alike.


RIVERSTONE RESORT: Court Issues Nothing Judgment in Ali Lawsuit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jeffrey Norman of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas issues a take nothing judgment in the
adversary proceeding captioned as HAMZAH ALI, Plaintiff, VS.
RIVERSTONE RESORT, LLC, AZHAR CHAUDHARY, AND AZHAR CHAUDHARY LAW
FIRM, P.C., Defendants, ADVERSARY NO. 22-3154 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.).

Before the Bankruptcy Court is the mandate from the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals issued on Jan. 21, 2025, in Matter of Riverstone
Resort, LLC. In its opinion, the Fifth Circuit remanded one issue
to the Bankruptcy Court and affirmed its Judgment after trial in
all other respects. The sole issue now before the Bankruptcy Court
is whether the statute of limitations was equitably tolled in this
case where the complainant has been induced or tricked by his
adversary's misconduct into allowing the filing deadlines to pass.

This adversary was filed on May 16, 2022, by the plaintiff Hamzah
Ali. Two of the defendants, Azhar Chaudhary and Azhar Chaudhary Law
Firm filed their answer to the amended complaint on Jan. 19, 2023,
which included the affirmative defense of the statute of
limitations. The Bankruptcy Court issued its Memorandum Opinion and
Final Judgment on March 30, 2023. The Final Judgment was a take
nothing judgment granted in favor of Ali as to his claim of a
constructive trust due to the applicable statute of limitations
barring further relief. In its opinion, the Bankruptcy Court found
that the statute of limitations began to run on Oct. 26, 2017, and
therefore four years elapsed on Oct. 25, 2021, prior to the
underlying bankruptcy case and this adversary case.

The Memorandum Opinion and Judgment were appealed to the District
Court by all the parties.

On Aug. 22, 2023, the District Court affirmed the bankruptcy
court's decision.

On Dec. 9, 2024, the Fifth Circuit issued its opinion reversing the
judgment of the District Court with instructions to remand the case
to the Bankruptcy Court. The District Court remanded the case to
the Bankruptcy Court on March 13, 2025.

The Bankruptcy Court reopened evidence and held an evidentiary
hearing on March 31, 2025.

On remand, the Bankruptcy Court holds that equitable tolling did
not occur in this case. It holds that the only evidence that
supports equitable tolling is the omission of Ali's lis pendens
from the bankruptcy schedules in the Riverstone bankruptcy case.
Ali's potential claim and/or the lis pendens filing are not
disclosed in the bankruptcy filing and Ali suggests that this was
intentional by Chaudhary. However, there is nothing in the record
to indicate that Chaudhary or Riverstone were ever served a copy of
the lis pendens when it was filed or that they had actual or
constructive knowledge of its filing when the bankruptcy case was
initiated, the Bankruptcy Court finds. The omission can be
explained by a lack of knowledge of Chaudhary and Riverstone.
Additionally, the Bankruptcy Court is aware that the filing date of
the Riverstone  bankruptcy was premediated by a foreclosure posting
on the subject property and there is no evidence that the
bankruptcy filing was in any way related to the filing of the lis
pendens.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=xP24gT from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About Riverstone Resort

Riverstone Resort, LLC is the fee simple owner of a real property
in Sugar Land, Texas, having an appraised value of $9.6 million.

Riverstone Resort filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 21-33531) on Oct. 29, 2021, disclosing
$9,620,007 in assets and $2,165,951 in liabilities.  Judge Jeffrey
P. Norman oversees the case.

David L. Venable, Esq., a practicing attorney in Houston, Texas, is
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  Sanjay R. Chadha Law, PLLC and
Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C. serve as special counsels.


RONALD JINSKY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ronald Jinsky, LLC
          d/b/a Jinsky Trucking LLC
        2870 S Bartells Drive
        Beloit, WI 53511

Business Description: Ronald Jinsky, LLC, doing business as Jinsky
                      Trucking, is a family-owned and operated
                      interstate trucking company based in Beloit,
                      Wisconsin.  Established in 1982, the Company
                      specializes in transporting general freight,
                      metal sheets, building materials, and paper
                      products.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Wisconsin

Case No.: 25-10838

Debtor's Counsel: Daniel J. McGarry, Esq.
                  KREKELER LAW, S.C.
                  26 Schroeder Court, Suite 300
                  Madison, WI 53711
                  Tel: (608) 258-8555
                  Fax: (608) 258-8299
                  E-mail: dmcgarry@ks-lawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Brandon Jinsky, in his role as authorized signer, affixed his
signature to the petition.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/IWWFHFA/Ronald_Jinsky_LLC__wiwbke-25-10838__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ROYAL PAPER: Files Voluntary Chapter 11 to Facilitate Sale Process
------------------------------------------------------------------
Royal Paper, LLC., a leading provider of high-quality paper
products, announced on April 8, 2025, that the Company has entered
into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Sofidel America Corp.,
pursuant to which Sofidel will acquire substantially all of the
Company's assets.

To facilitate the transaction, Royal has filed for voluntary
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. This
action is expected to provide for a quick and orderly sale of the
Company's assets under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, with
Sofidel serving as the "stalking horse bidder" in a
court-supervised auction and sale process.

The agreement with Sofidel remains subject to Court approval and
other customary conditions, including the receipt of any required
regulatory approvals. The Sofidel APA is subject to higher and
otherwise better offers received in the court-supervised process.

Royal intends to move through this process while operating in the
ordinary course -- providing the high-quality products that its
customers and partners rely on. In connection with the proposed
sale transaction, Royal has received a commitment for
debtor-in-possession financing from its existing secured lenders to
support the business through the sale process. The Company intends
to pay vendors, suppliers, and other trade creditors in full under
normal terms for goods and services provided during the bankruptcy
case.

"Our team has been working diligently to strengthen our financial
foundation in the face of difficult macroeconomic circumstances and
other challenges facing Royal," said Steve Schoembs, Chief
Executive of Royal. "Entering into an agreement with Sofidel
provides stability for our business, its customers, and our
employees, while we continue to run our sale process. I want to
thank our incredibly talented employees for their continued focus
and hard work, and our customers, partners, and suppliers for their
support."

Additional information on the Company's Chapter 11 case can be
found at https://dm.epiq11.com/RoyalPaper or call our dedicated
number at (888) 874-8095 (for toll-free U.S. and Canada calls) or
+1 (503) 897-9037 (for tolled international calls).

Royal is advised in this matter by Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell
LLP as legal counsel, Novo Advisors as financial advisor, and
Livingstone Partners as investment banker.

About Royal Paper

Founded in 1992 in Phoenix, AZ, Royal is a manufacturer and
national supplier of high-quality paper products. The Company began
as a family-owned business that operated a single converting line,
supplying napkins and bath tissues to local retailers in Phoenix,
Arizona. Since 1992, the Company has continuously evolved its
production capacity to produce additional products in a broad range
of configurations to a growing customer base. Today, the Company
provides a full range of paper products--paper towels, bath
tissues, facial tissues and napkins--across the value spectrum
(from premium to value products), with manufacturing across the
United States tailored to meet the specifications and standards of
their customers.


SCIENTIFIC ENERGY: Needs More Time to Finalize 10-K Filing
----------------------------------------------------------
Scientific Energy, Inc. filed a Notification of Late Filing on Form
12b-25 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, informing
that it is unable to file its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 within the prescribed time
period because additional time is required to finalize its
financial statements to be filed as part of the Form 10-K.

The Company expects to file the Form 10-K within the extension
period of 15 calendar days.

                     About Scientific Energy

Scientific Energy, Inc. is a mobile platform of ordering and
delivery services for restaurants or other merchants in Macau. The
Company's businesses are built on its platform, Aomi App.  The
Platform connects restaurants/merchants with consumers and Delivery
riders.  The Platform is created to serve the needs of these three
key areas and to become more intelligent and efficient with every
customer order.

Hong Kong-based Centurion ZD CPA & Co, the Company's auditor since
2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 16, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


SOLUNA HOLDINGS: Case Study on Luxor, BitMine Partnership
---------------------------------------------------------
Soluna Holdings, Inc., a developer of green data centers for
intensive computing applications, including Bitcoin mining and AI,
announced the release of a case study highlighting the success of
its strategic partnership with Luxor Technology Corporation and
BitMine Immersion Technologies.

The study, titled "Scaling Hashrate, Simplified: The Turnkey Mining
Model That Delivered for BitMine" showcases how Soluna and Luxor
joined forces to deliver a seamless, turnkey mining solution,
helping BitMine scale operations efficiently while mitigating key
industry risks.

Soluna provided stable, low-cost renewable power and infrastructure
at Project Sophie and Project Dorothy, while Luxor delivered
financial, operational, and strategic expertise, including hashrate
hedging, equipment financing, and fleet optimization via LuxOS
firmware. By integrating power, infrastructure, and financial
services into a single, predictable model, the partnership enabled
BitMine to:

     * Scale its ASIC fleet to 251.056 PH/s in nameplate hashrate,
more than tripling its previous capacity.
     * Secure long-term power stability, mitigating energy price
volatility.
     * Lock in hashprice terms, ensuring consistent mining
revenues.
     * Streamline deployment, reducing downtime, and accelerating
growth.
     * Optimize fleet performance, improving uptime and
profitability.

"This case study showcases how a well-executed partnership can
eliminate uncertainty in Bitcoin mining," said John Belizaire, CEO
of Soluna Holdings. "By aligning power infrastructure with
financial and operational support, we've created a solution that
enables mining companies like BitMine to scale sustainably and
predictably."

Ethan Vera, COO of Luxor Technology, added: "It has been amazing to
work with the bright minds at Soluna and BitMine throughout the
years. All three teams have complementary skill sets, leading to a
large success in scaling BitMine. This last deal is really first of
a kind, which speaks to the way BitMine's team thinks about
leveraging sophisticated structures to expand their operations in a
good risk-adjusted way and focusing on their expertise in capital
markets."

This collaboration sets a new standard for Bitcoin mining--where
power, operations, and financial strategy work together to drive
efficiency and scale.

Read the full case study here: https://tinyurl.com/SLNHCaseStudy

                       About Soluna Holdings

Headquartered in Albany, N.Y., Soluna Holdings designs, develops,
and operates digital infrastructure that transforms surplus
renewable energy into global computing resources. The Company's
modular data centers can be co-located with wind, solar, or
hydroelectric power plants and support compute-intensive
applications, including Bitcoin mining, generative AI, and
scientific computing. This approach aids in energizing a greener
grid while providing cost-effective and sustainable computing
solutions.

Albany, N.Y.-based UHY LLP, the Company's auditor since 2021,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated Mar. 31,
2025, attached in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2024, citing that the Company was in a net
loss, has negative working capital, and has significant outstanding
debt that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
a going concern.


STARR RAIL: Case Summary & Eight Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Starr Rail LLC
        2399 FM 895
        Cooper, TX 75432

Business Description: Starr Rail LLC operates as a rail logistics
                      and transloading provider.  Founded in 2018,
                      the Company focuses on first- and last-mile
                      rail solutions, offering services such as
                      transloading, storage, and bulk material
                      packaging.  Its operations accommodate a
                      range of freight, including lumber, steel,
                      aluminum, aggregates, plastic pellets,
                      diesel, and propane.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas

Case No.: 25-41307

Judge: Hon. Mark X Mullin

Debtor's Counsel: Robert T DeMarco, Esq.
                  DEMARCO MITCHELL, PLLC
                  12770 Coit Road, Suite 850
                  Dallas, TX 75251
                  Tel: (972) 991-5591
                  E-mail: robert@demarcomitchell.com

Total Assets: $2,763,979

Total Liabilities: $2,476,623

The petition was signed by Brian Williams as managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's eight unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/E4HSC7Y/Starr_Rail_LLC__txnbke-25-41307__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


SUSHI ZUSHI: Court Can't Confirm Ch. 11 Plans Under Sec. 1191(a)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael M. Parker of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Texas held that the plans of reorganization
of the following chapter 11 cases cannot be confirmed under Sec.
1191(a):

   (1) SUSHI ZUSHI OF TEXAS, LLC, CASE NO. 24-51147-MMP;
   (2) SUSHI ZUSHI OF STONE OAK, LLC, CASE NO. 24-51373-MMP;
   (3) SUSHI ZUSHI OF LINCOLN HEIGHTS, LLC, CASE NO. 24-51372-MMP;
and
   (4) SUSHI ZUSHI OF COLONNADE, LLC, CASE NO. 24-51371-MMP.

The Debtor filed a Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization which
created five classes of creditors. Relevant to this Opinion, Class
1 contained only one creditor, the Debtor's dominant secured lender
Gulf Coast Financial. Classes 1, 2, and 3 were the only impaired
classes entitled to vote under the SZ
Plan.

Additionally, the SZ Plan addressed claims held by Prosperum
Capital Partners, LLC, WebBank, 1st Alliance Group, LLC, EBF
Holdings, LLC, and U.S. Foods, Inc. (the "Unsecured UCC
Claimants"). The SZ Plan treats the Unsecured UCC Claimants as
effectively unsecured because Gulf Coast's lien encumbers all of
the Debtor's assets, leaving no collateral to which the Claimants'
liens could attach. Under the SZ Plan, liens held by the Unsecured
UCC Claimants would be extinguished as of the effective date of the
SZ Plan.

All members of Classes 2 and 3 voted in favor of the SZ Plan. Gulf
Coast in Class 1, however, chose not to file a ballot.

Before the Court is the confirmation of four separate chapter 11
cases, jointly administered under Case No. 24-51147-mmp. The Court
held a confirmation hearing on the four separate plans of
reorganization. During the hearing, Debtor Sushi Zushi of Texas,
LLC argued that its plan ("SZ Plan"), filed in a case under
subchapter V of chapter 11, should be confirmed consensually under
Sec. 1191(a) despite the lone creditor in the first class failing
to submit a ballot. Separately, the Court raised at the
confirmation hearing a question about the timing of the Debtor's
ability to "lien-strip" in a non-consensual plan under Sec.
1191(b), assuming the Debtor could not confirm under Sec. 1191(a).

The Court finds that the SZ Plan cannot be confirmed under Sec.
1191(a) but can still be confirmed as a non-consensual plan under
Sec. 1191(b). An impaired class of creditors which fails to cast a
ballot does not satisfy the requirements of Sec. 1129(a)(8), and
therefore Gulf Coast's failure to vote precludes a consensual
confirmation. The Court concludes the liens held by the Unsecured
UCC Claimants may properly be extinguished as of the effective date
of the SZ Plan.

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=QWrKXf from PacerMonitor.com.

                   About Sushi Zushi of Texas

Suhi Zushi is a modern Japanese restaurant chain serving
traditional foods, plus classic & Latin-influenced sushi rolls.

Sushi Zushi of Texas, LLC, Sushi Zushi of Colonnade, LLC, Sushi
Zushi of Lincoln Heights LLC and Sushi Zushi of Stone Oak, LLC
concurrently filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 24-51147) on
July 24, 2024. At the time of filing, each Debtor estimated
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities. The petitions were signed by Jason Kemp as manager.

Judge Michael M Parker presides over the case.

Ronald Smeberg, Esq., at THE SMEBERG LAW FIRM, is the Debtors'
counsel.



SWC INDUSTRIES: Updates Several Claims Pay; Files Amended Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
SWC Industries LLC and its affiliated debtors submitted a First
Amended Joint Plan dated March 17, 2025.

Although the Plan has been filed as a joint plan for each of the
Debtors and presents together Classes of Claims against, and
Interests in, the Debtors, the Plan does not provide for the
substantive consolidation of any of the Debtors.

Class A-3 consists of any OpCo Trade Claims. Unless such Holder and
the Plan Sponsor shall agree upon alternative treatment at no cost
to the Debtors or Creditor Trusts, each Holder of an OpCo Trade
Claim shall receive payment from the Plan Sponsor in Cash in an
amount equal to 50% of its OpCo Trade Claim on the date that is 12
months after the Effective Date; provided that, to the extent the
Allowed amount of any such Holder's unsecured Claim exceeds the
amount of its OpCo Trade Claim, such Holder shall have an OpCo GUC
in the amount of such excess.

Class A-4 consists of any OpCo GUCs. Subject to the Affiliate Group
Settlement, on the Effective Date or as soon as reasonably
practicable thereafter, each Holder of an Allowed OpCo GUC shall
receive its Pro Rata share of the OpCo GUC Pool. Class A-4 is
Impaired under the Plan.

Class B-5 consists of any Legacy GUCs.

     * If Class B-6 (Legacy Asbestos Claims) votes to accept the
Plan, each Holder of a Legacy GUC shall receive from the
Liquidating Trust its Pro Rata share of the Legacy GUC Pool,
provided that (A) the Legacy GUC Pool shall not include the
Asbestos Insurance and (B) the Liquidating Trustee shall not
account for any Legacy Asbestos Claims when determining each such
Holder's Pro Rata share of the Legacy GUC Pool.

     * If Class B-6 (Legacy Asbestos Claims) does not vote to
accept the Plan, each Holder of a Legacy GUC shall receive from the
Liquidating Trust its Pro Rata share of the Legacy GUC Pool,
provided that (A) the Legacy GUC Pool shall include the Asbestos
Insurance and (B) the Liquidating Trustee shall include both the
Legacy GUCs and the Legacy Asbestos Claims when determining each
such Holder's Pro Rata share of the Legacy GUC Pool.

Class B-6 consists of any Legacy Asbestos Claims.

     * If Class B-6 (Legacy Asbestos Claims) votes to accept the
Plan, then: (A) an Asbestos Trust shall be created and each Holder
of an Allowed Legacy Asbestos Claim shall receive from the Asbestos
Trust, except to the extent that such Holder agrees to less
favorable treatment, in exchange for full and final satisfaction,
settlement, release, and discharge of its Allowed Legacy Asbestos
Claim, its Pro Rata share of the proceeds of the Asbestos Insurance
and the Contingent Settlement Contribution; and (B) the Asbestos
Claim Bar Date shall be the date that is two years after the
Effective Date, as such date may be extended by the Asbestos
Trustee in his or her sole discretion.

     * If Class B-6 (Legacy Asbestos Claims) does not vote to
accept the Plan, each Holder of a Legacy Asbestos Claim shall
receive from the Liquidating Trust its Pro Rata share of the Legacy
GUC Pool, provided that (A) the Legacy GUC Pool shall include the
Asbestos Insurance and (B) the Liquidating Trustee shall include
both the Legacy GUCs and the Legacy Asbestos Claims when
determining each such Holder's Pro Rata share of the Legacy GUC
Pool.

This Plan provides for a settlement of all claims, Causes of
Action, and disputes among the Debtors and their Estates and the
Affiliate Group. Specifically, the Plan provides for the Debtors to
release all of the Estates' claims and Causes of Action, including
Avoidance Actions, against each Person or Entity within the
Affiliate Group, and the Affiliate Group is releasing any claims
and Causes of Action against the Debtors and their Estates. In
consideration of such settlement and releases: (a) WCMC's OpCo GUCs
shall be Allowed in the amount of $26,552,610; (b) the Legacy WCMC
Secured Note Claims shall be Allowed in the amount of $26,480,321;
and (c) WCMC shall be deemed to have assigned to the Liquidating
Trust 80% of the recoveries that the Plan would otherwise provide
on account of such WCMC Claims as follows:

     * the first $3 million to the Environmental Reserve; and

     * the remaining amount to the Legacy GUC Pool.

In addition, in the event that Class B-6 (Legacy Asbestos Claims)
votes to accept the Plan, WCMC shall be deemed to have assigned an
additional 10% of any recoveries that the Plan would otherwise
provide on account of WCMC's Claims to the Asbestos Trust.

Unless otherwise specified herein, all Cash required for the
payments to be made hereunder shall solely be obtained from (i)
Retained Cash, (ii) the Plan Sponsor Payment, (iii) Asbestos
Insurance, and (iv) any proceeds of Retained Assets. The Cure Costs
on account of Assumed Contracts assumed by the Reorganized Debtors
and distributions to be made on account of OpCo Trade Claims will
be paid directly to the applicable recipients by the Plan Sponsor
and shall not be an obligation of any Debtor or its Estate.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Joint Plan dated March 17,
2025 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=VnfqFX from Stretto,
Inc., the claims agent.

Counsel to the Debtors:

     C. Luckey McDowell, Esq.
     Ian E. Roberts, Esq.
     ALLEN OVERY SHEARMAN STERLING US LLP
     2601 Olive Street, 17th Floor
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Phone: (214) 271-5777
     Email: luckey.mcdowell@aoshearman.com
            ian.roberts@aoshearman.com

     Robert G. Harris, Esq.
     Reno Fernandez, Esq.
     Binder Malter Harris & Rome-Banks LLP
     2775 Park Avenue
     Santa Clara, CA 95050
     Telephone: (408) 295-1700
     Email: rob@bindermalter.com

                    About SWC Industries LLC

With principal operations in California and Massachusetts, SWC
Industries LLC manufactures a range of innovative sealing and
logistics equipment -- and offers related services -- that create
efficiencies and reduce costs across multiple industries. In
addition, the Company's San Diego-based business designs and
develops a full suite of software designed to improve warehouse
operations.

SWC Industries LLC and 12 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. N.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 24-51721) on Nov. 13, 2024.

SWC listed assets and debt of $50 million to $100 million as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Allen Overy Shearman Sterling US LLP as lead
restructuring counsel; Binder Malter Harris & Rome-Banks LLP as
restructuring co-counsel and local counsel; Getzler Henrich &
Associates LLC as financial advisor; and Gordian Group, LLC, as
investment banker. Stretto, Inc., is the claims agent.


TAMPA BRASS: Committee Hires Erik Johanson PLLC as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Tampa Brass and
Aluminum Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to employ Erik Johanson PLLC as
counsel.

The firm's services include:

   (i) reviewing financial information furnished by the Debtor or
Committee;

   (ii) negotiating the budget and use of cash collateral;

   (iii) reviewing and investigating the liens of purported secured
parties;

   (iv) conferring with the Debtor's management and counsel;

   (v) coordinating efforts to sell encumbered and unencumbered
assets of the Debtor in a manner that maximizes the value for
unsecured creditors;

   (vi) reviewing the Debtor's schedules and statements of
financial affairs;

   (vii) advising the Committee as to the ramifications regarding
all of the Debtor's activities and motions before the Court;

   (viii) preparing and filing appropriate pleadings on behalf of
the Committee; and

   (ix) assisting the Committee in negotiations with the Debtor and
other parties in interest on an exit strategy for this case.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Attorneys           $275 to $395 per hour
     Paraprofessional    $125 to $175 per hour

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Erik Johanson, Esq., a partner at Erik Johanson PLLC, disclosed in
a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Erik Johanson, Esq.
     Joseph R. Boyd, Esq.
     Erik Johanson PLLC
     3414 W. Bay to Bay Boulevard Suite 300
     Tampa, FL 33629
     Tel: (813) 210-9442
     Email: erik@johanson.law
            jr@johanson.law
            ecf@johanson.law

              About Tampa Brass and Aluminum Corporation

Tampa Brass and Aluminum Corporation --
https://tampabrass.com/about/ -- is a supplier of cast machined
parts for the commercial and defense industries. The company is
based in Tampa, Fla.

Tampa Brass and Aluminum filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 25-00105) on January 9, 2025. In its petition, the
Debtor reported between $1 million and $10 million in assets and
between $10 million and $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Roberta A. Colton oversees the case.

Scott A. Stichter, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A.
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.



TEXAS AUTO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Texas Auto and Truck, Inc.
           d/b/a Griffin Motors
           d/b/a Griffin Motors-Buda
           d/b/a Austin Auto Exchange
        8245 S. US Hwy 183
        Lockhart TX 78644

Business Description: Texas Auto and Truck, Inc., operating as
                      Griffin Motors, is a pre-owned vehicle and
                      RV dealership based in Lockhart, Texas,
                      offering a wide range of inspected,
                      quality vehicles.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas

Case No.: 25-10509

Debtor's Counsel: Todd Headden, Esq.     
                  HAYWARD PLLC
                  7600 Burnet Road, Suite 530
                  Austin TX 78757
                  Tel: (737) 881-7100
                  E-mail: theadden@haywardfirm.com

Total Assets: $4,113,631

Total Liabilities: $2,651,915

The petition was signed by Haskell Griffin as president/owner.

A full-text copy of the petition, which includes a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors, is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/4EVHLRI/Texas_Auto_and_Truck_Inc__txwbke-25-10509__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


TEXAS REIT: Amends WCW Houston & Dalio Secured Claims Pay
---------------------------------------------------------
Texas REIT, LLC submitted an Amended Disclosure Statement for the
Plan of Reorganization.

The Plan which this Disclosure Statement accompanies is being
promulgated by the Debtor It has attempted to provide the maximum
recovery to each Class of Claims in light of the assets and
anticipated funds available for distribution to Creditors. The
Debtor believes that the Plan permits the maximum possible recovery
for all Classes of Claims while facilitating the reorganization of
the Debtor.

The Debtor proposes to continue operating its property while it
sells its two tracts. The Debtor has two pending motions to sell.
The sales proceeds will be held until such time as a final order is
entered determining lien priority. The Debtor will continue to
collect rents while it is pursuing the sales of its property.

The Debtor owns real property located at 8050 and 8098 Westheimer.
The property has been appraised. MB Lane & Associates as of May 11,
2024 in the amount of $18,615,000 as is. The Harris County
Appraisal District has valued the tract at 8050 Westheimer at
$6,868,038 and the tract at 8098 Westheimer at $4,305,041 The
Debtor received an offer to sell the 8098 Westheimer tract for $5.5
million and an offer on 8052-8098 Westheimer for $10,000,000.

The plan proposes to sell the Debtor's real property and distribute
the funds to the parties determined to be entitled to receive such
proceeds. Angelo DeCaro would administer the Plan as Plan Trustee.
Because the Debtor already has sales pending before the Court, the
liquidation of the real estate assets is expected to be concluded
within a short period of time after Plan Confirmation.  

Class 5 consists of the Secured Claims of WCW Houston Properties,
LLC and Dalio Holdings, I, LLC. WCW Houston Properties, LLC shall
be designated as the Class 5(a) claim. Dalio Holdings I, LLC shall
be designated as the Class 5(b) claim. WCW has filed a proof of
claim in the amount of $9,230,960.53. Dalio I Holdings, LLC filed a
proof of claim in the amount of $13,855,502.34.

The liens of the Class 5 creditors shall be preserved to the same
extent, priority and validity as exists under applicable non
bankruptcy law. Upon sale of the Tract or Tracts, the liens of the
Class 5 creditors shall attach to such proceeds to the same extent,
priority and validity as exists under applicable nonbankruptcy
law.

The relative rights, priority and validity of the claims of the
Class 5(a) and Class 5(b) creditors shall be determined in Adv. No.
24-1045 or as may be agreed upon between the parties. Upon entry of
a judgment that is not subject to further appeal or review, the
Plan Trustee shall pay the Class 5 creditors in order of their
priority. Class 5 is impaired.

The Amended Disclosure Statement does not alter the proposed
treatment for unsecured creditors and the equity holder:

     * Class 6 shall consist of Allowed Claims of Unsecured
Creditors. Upon payment of the creditors in Classes 1 to 5, the
Plan Trustee shall pay the remaining assets of the estate to the
Class 6 creditors to the extent of their Allowed Claims. The Class
6 claims shall not be entitled to post-petition interest. Class 6
is impaired.

     * Class 7 shall consist of the Equity Interests of the Debtor.
Ali Choudhri clams to hold 100% of the equity ownership of the
Debtor. Ali Mokaram claims a 30% equity interest. However, in Case
No. 2012-27197A, the District Court of Harris County awarded Mr.
Mokaram $3,467,217.20 for the value of his equity interest. Mr.
Choudhri contends that this award extinguished Mr. Mokaram's equity
interest. Because it is unlikely that equity will receive any
distribution in this case, the dispute over ownership is unlikely
to have a practical impact upon the case.

Feasibility of the Plan and Risk to Creditors measures the
likelihood that creditors will receive the payments promised to
them. The feasibility of the Plan depends on the ability of the
Plan Trustee to sell the real property. The Debtor believes that
the property is in a desirable area and should be able to sell for
a fair price.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated March
17, 2025 is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=PVkvdC from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Stephen W. Sather, Esq.
     BARRON & NEWBURGER PC
     7320 N. MoPac Expy., Ste. 400
     Austin, TX 78731
     Telephone: (512) 476-9103
     Facsimile: (512) 279-0310
     Email: ssather@bn-lawyers.com

                       About Texas REIT LLC

Texas REIT, LLC owns a strip center in Houston, Texas located at
8050-8098 Westheimer.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 24-10120) on February 6,
2024. In the petition signed by Drew Dennett, authorized
representative, the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Shad Robinson oversees the case.

Stephen W Sather, Esq., at Barron & Newburger, PC, represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.


TEXAS SOLAR: Unsecureds Will Get 100% of Claims over 5 Years
------------------------------------------------------------
Texas Solar Integrated, LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Texas a Disclosure Statement for Plan
of Reorganization dated March 14, 2025.

The Debtor is a Texas limited liability company founded in 2006 by
Thomas Hudgins. TSI was in the business of selling, designing,
installing and servicing solar systems, primarily in the
residential market.

On November 14, 2024, the Debtor filed its voluntary petition for
relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, thereby initiating
the bankruptcy case and creating its bankruptcy estate. The
bankruptcy filing was necessary due to the lack of liquidity
necessary to pay current operating expenses and to avoid the cost
of litigation with Hammonds.

Since the Petition Date, the Texas Solar has assisted Visible Solar
in the monetization of a portion of its solar tax credits in order
to pay its accounts receivable owed to Texas Solar. In February
2025, the Debtor received a payment totaling approximately $2.9
million from one such transaction. The Debtor is currently involved
in a second similar transaction which, if consummated with generate
and additional approximately $6.4 million in proceeds.

The post confirmation Reorganized Debtor will be in the lease
servicing business. That will require the Reorganized Debtor to
manage its warranty obligations to customers who purchased or
leased solar systems from the Debtor with enforceable warranties.
In order to meet those commitments, the Debtor will need internal
capabilities for intake of service calls, scheduling of service
calls, management of an outside service contractor and purchase of
service parts. The Reorganized Debtor will also manage collection
and/or monetization of the notes receivable and solar system leases
held by the Debtor. Finally, the Reorganized Debtor will manage the
collection and/or monetization of the SPV Notes.  

Under the terms of the SPV Notes, installments to Texas Solar
commence 63 months after the date of each note. Since the SPV Notes
originated beginning in mid-2023 continuing through mid 2024,
payments on the SPV Notes will commence in the fourth quarter of
2028 and will increase as more notes pass beyond 63 months from
origination. The Debtor anticipates that payments on the SPV Notes
will increase through the second quarter of 2030 when they reach a
total of $1,686,668 per quarter and for anticipated annual receipts
in excess of $6.7 million. The SPV Note payment stream will
continue through approximately 2053.

Class 4 Includes the Allowed Claims of General Unsecured Creditor,
including the Allowed Claims of the Class 3 Creditor if its Lien is
invalidated and Allowed Class 5 Consumer Claims.

Class 3 General Unsecured Claim shall receive one hundred percent
of their total Allowed Class 4 General Unsecured Claim, in full
satisfaction of the Class 4 Allowed Claims. Commencing on the first
day of the first month following 60 months after the Effective
Date, the Debtor shall pay each Allowed Class 3 Claim in 10 equal
semiannual installments amortized over 5 years.

Class 7 consists of the claims of Thomas Hudgins and James Drought
III which arise from the repurchase of their equity interests in
the Debtor. This Class shall be paid without interest after all
Allowed Claims in Classes 1 through 6 are paid in full.

Class 8 Allowed Interest Holders will retain their equity interests
but shall not receive any payments of distributions on account of
those interests until all senior classes are paid in full. Nothing
in the Plan, or in the Order Confirming the Plan, changes, alters,
or modifies (i) the Debtor's Company Agreement as amended from time
to time; (ii) the rights and obligations of the Debtor or any
member under the Company Agreement; provided, further nothing in
this Plan constitutes a release of the members or insiders to the
Debtor unless specifically set out herein and the Disclosure
Statement.

After confirmation of the Plan, the Reorganized Debtor will
continue to operate on a reduced and streamlined basis. The Debtor
will have three employees, Sardo, Kris Hill and a service
technician (who may be an independent contractor). The Reorganized
Debtor's operations will include the following (i) collection of
accounts receivable; (ii) pursuit of opportunities to monetize
note, lease and account receivables on a favorable basis; (iii)
manage and perform warranty service (iii) maintain books and
records and file appropriate reports and tax returns; (iv) manage
litigation of all Causes of Action; and (v) pay creditors in
accordance with the Plan.

Initially the Reorganized Debtor will pay Allowed Claims and
operating expenses from cash on hand and from collections on
accounts, leases and notes. In addition, the Reorganized Debtor
will market and sell certain receivables to generate additional
liquidity. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2028, payments on the
SPV Notes will commence, generating additional cash flow for Plan
payments. By the end of the first quarter of 2030, the quarterly
revenue generated from the SPV Note payments will exceed $1.67
million. Those payments will continue for the term of the notes
which continues until 2053.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated March 14, 2025
is available at https://urlcurt.com/u?l=h2t717 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The firm can be reached through:

     Raymond W. Battaglia, Esq.
     Law Offices of Ray Battaglia, PLLC
     66 Granburg Circle
     San Antonio, TX 78218
     Telephone: (210) 601-9405
     Email: rbattaglialaw@outlook.com

                  About Texas Solar Integrated

Texas Solar Integrated, LLC is a solar panel installation company
in San Antonio, Texas.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Case No. 24-52297) on November
14, 2024, with $50 million to $100 million in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities. Mike Sardo, manager, signed
the petition.

Judge Michael M. Parker oversees the case.

Ray Battaglia, Esq., at the Law Offices of Ray Battaglia, PLLC,
represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.


TLC MEDICAL: Court Extends Cash Collateral Access to May 15
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
issued its sixth interim order allowing TLC Medical Group, Inc. to
continue using cash collateral.

The sixth interim order signed by Judge Mindy Mora approved the use
of cash collateral to pay expenses for the period from April 1 to
May 15 in accordance with the company's budget. The budget shows
$65,021.19 in total expenses.

TLC is prohibited from using cash collateral for purposes outside
of the approved budget.

As protection, secured creditors will be granted replacement liens
on TLC's assets in case of any diminution in the value of their
collateral.

The next hearing is scheduled for May 15.

                    About TLC Medical Group Inc.

TLC Medical Group, Inc. provides diagnosis and treatment of heart
and circulatory disorders. It is based in Port St. Lucie, Fla.

TLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 24-21588) on November 4, 2024, with
total assets of $1,905,679 and total liabilities of $2,093,600.
Anthony Lewis, president of TLC, signed the petition.

Judge Mindy A. Mora handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   Susan D. Lasky, Esq
   Tel: 954-400-7474
   Email: ecf@suelasky.com


URBAN ONE: Moody's Downgrades CFR to 'Caa2', Outlook Negative
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Ratings downgraded Urban One, Inc.'s Corporate Family
Rating to Caa2 from B3, Probability of Default Rating to Caa2-PD
from B3-PD and senior secured notes rating to Caa2 from B3. The
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating (SGL) remains unchanged at
SGL-2. The outlook remains negative.

The downgrade of the CFR reflects Urban One's operating
performance, which fell short of Moody's expectations due to
sustained challenges in the broadcast radio and cable TV segments,
such as subscriber attrition and lower audience engagement. These
risks raise the possibility of distressed debt exchanges,
especially given elevated leverage, Urban One's weak equity
valuation (market capitalization of $36 million) and low debt
trading levels. There is limited visibility into the pace of future
subscriber losses and whether radio advertising demand will
stabilize.

"Although Moody's expects Urban One to maintain good liquidity, the
company's cable TV segment faces significant pressures due to
consistent declines in cable subscribers, leading to reduced
affiliate revenues. As a result, Moody's expects adjusted debt to
EBITDA to increase to the mid to high 6x range over the next 12
months" said Alison Chisuhl Jung, a Moody's Ratings VP-Senior
Analyst.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Urban One's Caa2 CFR reflects secular pressures in the cable TV and
radio broadcast segments, and elevated financial leverage. The
cable TV segment is facing significant challenges due to persistent
subscriber losses and audience engagement declines.  Despite
contractual agreements with cable and satellite companies that
include annual escalators, the benefits of the rate increases have
been more than offset by the declining subscriber base and lower
viewership. TV One subscribers decreased to 37.2 million (-13.3%
YoY, -4.9% QoQ). Despite the weak operating performance, the
company's adjusted debt to EBITDA (including Moody's standard lease
adjustments) decreased to 5.8x in 2024 from 6.2x in 2023 due to
debt repurchases in the open market. In 2025, Moody's projects a
revenue decline in the low teens percentage and an EBITDA decline
in the high 20 percentage, mainly driven by the absence of
political advertising dollars in a non-election year, ongoing churn
of cable TV subscribers and weakness in radio broadcast. Although
Urban One expanded its revenue streams in connected TV through
partnerships, these efforts have not been sufficient to offset the
overall declines driven by secular pressures in cable TV and radio.
As a result, financial leverage is projected to increase to 6.6x in
2025 despite the company's ongoing open market purchases of debt.
Governance risks, including a track record of acquisitions and
operating with high leverage, were a key consideration to the
rating actions.

Urban One's SGL-2 rating reflects good liquidity with a cash
balance of approximately $138 million at year end 2024, access to
an undrawn $50 million ABL facility due 2026 (not rated by us) and
Moody's expectations for $10-$15 million in free cash flow in the
next 12-18 months. The company reduced the principal amount of
senior secured notes by $140 million in 2024 ($25 million in 2023)
and additional $17 million in Q1 2025 through debt buybacks. As a
result, annual interest expense is expected to decrease to $42
million in 2025 with potential for declines with further debt
reduction.

Urban One's senior secured notes due 2028 are not subject to
financial covenants, but the ABL facility is subject to a springing
fixed charge coverage test. The company complied with the
requirement 2024. Moody's expects the company to remain in
compliance for the next 12 to 18 months, although Moody's do not
anticipate the company drawing on the facility.

The Caa2 rating assigned to the senior secured notes is in line
with the Caa2 CFR as it represents the vast majority of outstanding
debt. The asset-based lending facility (unrated) ranks senior to
the secured debt for collateral that supports its borrowing base.
The senior secured notes receive guarantees from significant
subsidiaries of Urban One, including TV One, Reach Media, Inc. (90%
ownership) and Interactive One.

The negative outlook reflects Moody's views that weak operating
performance may persist resulting in continuing subscriber churn in
the cable TV segment and weak radio advertising demand. While
Moody's anticipates that the company will continue to buyback debt
in the open market, there is significant uncertainty regarding the
company's ability to stabilize revenue and profitability. Moody's
do not expect cash balances to be directed towards large
acquisitions in the near term.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Urban One's ratings could be upgraded if Moody's expects adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA to be sustained below 7.0x, with positive organic
growth in the radio and cable network operations and good
liquidity.

The ratings could be downgraded if revenue declines persist or
profitability remains weak due to declining subscriber trends and
weak advertising demand such that the liquidity position
deteriorates further or Moody's assessments of the probability of
default were to increase.

Urban One, Inc., formerly known as Radio One, Inc., is an urban
oriented multi-media company that operates or owns interests in
radio broadcasting stations generated by 72 stations in 13 markets,
cable television networks, a 90% ownership in Reach Media, and
ownership of Interactive One, its digital platform, as well as
other internet-based properties, largely targeting an
African-American and urban audience. The company reported
consolidated revenue of $450 million in 2024.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Media published
in June 2021.


US COATING: Gets Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral Until April 29
-----------------------------------------------------------------
US Coating Specialists, LLC received second interim approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida,
West Palm Beach Division, to use cash collateral until the next
hearing scheduled for April 29.

The company was authorized to use cash collateral to cover
necessary business expenses as per the budget, with a 10% variance
allowed. It projects total expenses of $318,529.07 for April.

The U.S. Small Business Administration and Leaf Capital Funding,
LLC may assert an interest in the cash collateral.

As protection for the use of their cash collateral, both lenders
were granted a post-petition lien on the cash collateral to the
same extent and with the same validity and priority as their
pre-bankruptcy lien.

                   About US Coating Specialists

US Coating Specialists, LLC is a licensed commercial roofing
company in Florida, offering services like SPF spray foam,
silicone, and metal roofing. It also provides roof repairs,
maintenance, and emergency services for commercial and industrial
buildings. The company works with trusted partners and offers
financing options for new roofing systems.

US Coating Specialists filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 25-11972) on February 25, 2025, listing up to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities. Anthony Flett, chief executive
officer of US Coating Specialists, signed the petition.

Judge Mindy A. Mora oversees the case.

Mark F. Robens, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain, & Postler P.A.,
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.

Leaf Capital Funding, LLC, as lender, may be reached at:

     Brian Kestenbaum
     Manager
     110 S. Poplar Street, Suite 101
     Wilmington, DE 19108
     Email: sbarnett@leafnow.com


US LIGHTING: Delays Annual Report Filing Due to CFO Vacancy
-----------------------------------------------------------
US Lighting Group, Inc. has notified the Securities and Exchange
Commission that it will be unable to file its annual report for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2024, within the required timeframe.

In a Form 12b-25 filed with the SEC, the Company cited the absence
of a chief financial officer as the reason for the delay.  Former
CFO Michael A. Coates resigned on Sept. 27, 2024, and the Company
has yet to appoint a replacement.

As a result, the completion of its Form 10-K has been postponed.
Although the Company intends to submit the Form 10-K as soon as
possible, it does not expect to meet the 15-day extension period
allowed under SEC Rule 12b-25.

The Company anticipates that revenues for the year ended Dec. 31,
2024, will be less than $1.0 million, compared to approximately
$3.6 million for 2023.  The expected decrease is primarily
attributable to a decline in camper sales by the Company's Cortes
Campers subsidiary during 2024.

                         About US Lighting

Headquartered in Euclid, Ohio, US Lighting Group, Inc. --
www.USLightingGroup.com -- is an innovative composite manufacturer
specializing in advanced fiberglass technologies for high-growth
sectors, including high-end recreational vehicles (RVs),
prefabricated off-grid housing, and high-performance powerboats.
Drawing inspiration and expertise from the marine industry -- where
durability and precision engineering are paramount -- the Company
applies the latest advancements in composite technology to deliver
superior products.  The Company's molded fiberglass products are
known for their exceptional strength, lightweight construction, and
long-lasting durability.  In addition to being corrosion-resistant,
composite materials offer excellent insulation properties, making
them ideal for outdoor recreational use and residential housing
applications.  Molded construction allows for the creation of
irregular, unusual or circular objects, which permits the
innovative shapes and features of the Company's products.   As of
Dec. 31, 2023, its revenue was primarily driven by the shipment of
fiberglass campers sold under its Cortes Campers brand.

Columbus, Ohio-based GBQ Partners LLC, the Company's auditor since
2023, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 15, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a significant accumulated deficit.
In addition, the Company continues to experience negative cash
flows from operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


US LIGHTING: Director Olga Smirnova Resigns From Board
------------------------------------------------------
US Lighting Group, Inc. announced that Olga Smirnova resigned from
its board of directors on April 4, 2025, due to personal
circumstances, according to a Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
Smirnova will remain with the Company as vice president of finance
and administration.

The Company thanked Smirnova for her years of board service and
ongoing contributions.  A replacement has not yet been named, but
US Lighting said it is actively searching for new board members.

           Taylor Bennington Joins as VP and General Counsel

US Lighting further announced that on March 19, 2025, Taylor
Bennington joined the Company as vice president and general
counsel.  In this role, Mr. Bennington will oversee all legal and
regulatory matters, advise senior leadership on business strategy,
and ensure the company remains in full compliance with industry
regulations.

Mr. Bennington, 29, holds a Juris Doctor from the University of
Akron and brings a broad range of legal expertise, including
corporate governance, contract negotiation, and regulatory
compliance.  With more than a decade of experience working with
leading companies across multiple industries, he brings a wealth of
legal and corporate knowledge to the Company.

Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Bennington served as an associate
attorney in the financial services litigation practice at
McGlinchey Stafford.  Before that, he was the Managing Attorney at
Oath Law in Akron, Ohio, where he played a key role in the
company's growth, navigating complex legal challenges related to
mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property, and corporate
development.

                         About US Lighting

Headquartered in Euclid, Ohio, US Lighting Group, Inc. --
www.USLightingGroup.com -- is an innovative composite manufacturer
specializing in advanced fiberglass technologies for high-growth
sectors, including high-end recreational vehicles (RVs),
prefabricated off-grid housing, and high-performance powerboats.
Drawing inspiration and expertise from the marine industry -- where
durability and precision engineering are paramount -- the Company
applies the latest advancements in composite technology to deliver
superior products.  The Company's molded fiberglass products are
known for their exceptional strength, lightweight construction, and
long-lasting durability.  In addition to being corrosion-resistant,
composite materials offer excellent insulation properties, making
them ideal for outdoor recreational use and residential housing
applications.  Molded construction allows for the creation of
irregular, unusual or circular objects, which permits the
innovative shapes and features of the Company's products.   As of
Dec. 31, 2023, its revenue was primarily driven by the shipment of
fiberglass campers sold under its Cortes Campers brand.

Columbus, Ohio-based GBQ Partners LLC, the Company's auditor since
2023, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 15, 2024, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a significant accumulated deficit.
In addition, the Company continues to experience negative cash
flows from operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


VANTAGE POINT: Hires Kerkman & Dunn as General Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Vantage Point Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin to employ Kerkman &
Dunn as general counsel.

The firm will render these services:

     (a) advise and assist the Debtor with respect to its duties
and powers under the Bankruptcy Code;

     (b) advise the Debtor on the conduct of its Chapter 11 case,
including the legal and administrative requirements of operating in
Chapter 11;

     (c) attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of the
creditors and other parties in interest;

     (d) prosecute actions on the behalf of the Debtor, defend
actions commenced against the Debtor, and represent the Debtor's
interests in negotiations concerning litigation in which the Debtor
is involved, including objections to claims filed against the
Debtor's estates;

     (e) prepare pleadings in connection with the Debtor's Chapter
11 case including motions, applications, answers, orders, reports,
and papers necessary or otherwise beneficial to the administration
of the Debtor's estates;

     (f) advise the Debtor in connection with any potential sales
of assets;

     (g) appear before the Court to represent the interests of the
Debtor's estate;

     (h) assist the Debtor in preparing, negotiating and
implementing a plan, and advising with respect to any rejection of
a plan and reformulation of a plan, if necessary;

     (i) assist and advise the Debtor in state court actions
related to judgments and collection actions initiated by or against
the Debtor that are necessary for an effective reorganization; and

     (j) perform all other necessary or appropriate legal services
for the Debtor in connection with the prosecution of their Chapter
11 cases, including (i) analyzing the Debtor's leases and
contracts, and the assumption and assignment or rejection of them,
(ii) analyzing the validity of liens against the Debtor, and (iii)
advising the Debtor on transactional and litigation matters.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Jerome R. Kerkman                 $595 per hour
     Evan P. Schmit                    $515 per hour
     Nicholas W. Kerkman               $315 per hour
     Anjanette G. Seymour              $250 per hour
     Non-Attorney Paraprofessionals    $125 per hour

As disclosed in the court filings, K&D is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of§ 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and as
required by § 327(a), and does not hold or represent an interest
adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jerome R. Kerkman, Esq.
     Kerkman & Dunn
     839 N. Jefferson St., Suite 400
     Milwaukee, WI 53202-3722
     Tel: (414) 277-8200
     Fax: (414) 277-0100
     Email: jkerkman@kerkmandunn.com

              About Vantage Point Corporation

Vantage Point Corporation, also known as VPCInnovations and BuyVPC,
is a technology solutions provider. The Company offers a
comprehensive range of IT hardware, software, and hosted/managed
services to various sectors, including small and medium-sized
businesses, enterprises, healthcare, education, government, and
legal industries.

Vantage Point Corporation sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wis. Case No. 25-21737) on April
2, 2025. In its petition, the Debtor reports estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Rachel M. Blise handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by Evan P. Schmit, Esq. at KERKMAN &
DUNN.


VIDEO RIVER: Delays 10-K Filing for Audit Completion
----------------------------------------------------
Video River Networks, Inc. filed a Notification of Late Filing on
Form 12b-25 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
informing that it requires additional time for its auditors to
complete the annual audit of its annual report for the period ended
December 31, 2024.

The Company expects to file its Form 10-K within the 15-day
extension period provided under Rule 12b-25 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                         About Video River

Headquartered in Torrance, California, Video River Networks, Inc.
is a technology firm that operates and manages a portfolio of
Electric Vehicles, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and
Robotics assets, businesses, and operations in North America. The
Company's target portfolio businesses and assets include operations
that design, develop, manufacture, and sell high-performance fully
electric vehicles and design, manufacture, install, and sell Power
Controls, Battery Technology, Wireless Technology, and Residential
utility meters and remote, mission-critical devices mostly
engineered through Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and
Robotic technologies.

Newhall, California-based DylanFloyd Accounting & Consulting, the
Company's former auditor, issued a "going concern" qualification in
its report dated April 15, 2024, citing that the Company has an
accumulated deficit of $15,898,383 for the year ended December 31,
2023. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.

Video River Networks reported net income of $496,026 for the year
ended December 31, 2023, compared to net income of $767,121 for the
year ended December 31, 2022. As of June 30, 2024, Video River
Networks had $1,562,602 in total assets, $69,406 in total
liabilities, and $1,493,196 in total stockholders' equity.


VMR CONTRACTORS: Loses Bid to Modify Structural Iron Workers CBA
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Michael B. Slade of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied without
prejudice VMR Contractors, Inc.'s motion seeking to modify the
collective bargaining agreement of Structural Iron Workers Local
No. 1 ("Local 1").

VMR Contractors, Inc. is a construction sub-contractor that, from
2014-22, completed many projects in the Chicagoland area and
employed many people, most of them union members. VMR hit hard
times when contractors slow-paid it during the COVID-19 pandemic,
leading to this chapter 11 case. A key obstacle to confirming a
plan and creating a reorganized VMR -- by all accounts -- is
treatment of a CBA between it and Local 1.

VMR is presumably an acronym for the company's founder, sole owner,
and President, Vincent M. Robertson. Robertson has been an
ironworker for 31 years. Robertson was also not only a union
member, but a member of Local 1 entitled to a pension from the
related Structural Iron Workers Local No. 1 Fund (the "Fund").

Section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1113, imposes
more stringent standards and rigorous procedures for rejecting a
collective bargaining agreement than apply to an ordinary executory
contract.  Section 1113 provides highly detailed, strict procedural
and substantive rules, all of which must be followed before a CBA
can be rejected. When used correctly, these carefully crafted
provisions encourage consensus and provide numerous opportunities
for agreement, requiring parties to negotiate in good faith while
making clear that CBA rejection is available for debtors (and a
risk for unions) where it is necessary as a last resort to confirm
a chapter 11 plan.

VMR filed four proposed plans before the first confirmation
hearing. It intended to pursue confirmation of its Third Amended
Plan at a hearing on Aug. 19, 2024. Most of the votes were in favor
of the plan.  And only one party objected: the Fund. The Fund had
filed a proof of claim for $190,757.69 seeking payments under the
CBA. It argued that if the proposed plan was not rejecting the CBA,
it must be assuming, which carried an obligation to cure whatever
was owed at the time of assumption. The Fund insisted on the entire
$190,757.69 being paid on the date of confirmation. VMR's plan did
not propose to pay that amount because it could not.

Judge Slade's predecessor denied confirmation on Aug. 19, 2024. The
proposed plan did not say whether the CBAs would be assumed or
rejected but purported to treat the agreements (and the Fund's
claim) in the plan. As Judge Slade's predecessor described, "VMR
doesn't propose in its plan to have the collective bargaining
agreement simply ride through. Instead, VMR proposes to pay the
priority portion of the claim in full on the effective date,
whenever that is, and then pay only 5 to 10 percent of the general
unsecured portion" which "impairs the Structural Ironworkers'
rights under its CBA." Judge Slade's predecessor gave the Debtor
three options: VMR can assume the collective bargaining agreement
and comply with section 365(b)(1); reject the agreement and comply
with section 1113; or let the agreement ride through the case
untouched, leaving the Structural Ironworkers to pursue its
$190,757 claim against VMR post bankruptcy.

Following the denial of confirmation, VMR concluded that assuming
the CBA was not an option because it could not cure the amount the
Fund claimed would be owed as a result. Nor would  trying to let
the CBA "ride through" be sensible,  since VMR would immediately
face a claim (and perhaps a suit) from the Fund seeking payment of
what it claimed. The only solution, VMR believed, was the section
1113 process.

VMR's proposed "modification" was solely to ask the Fund (through
Local 1) to accept a cure payment different from the prompt payment
in full required by section 365(b) -- i.e., to accept payment of
the default according to the terms the proposed plan provides to
allowed prepetition claims (which is what the Fund would receive if
the CBA is rejected and the Fund's proof of claim is allowed as
filed).

But there were several problems with VMR's proposal, the Court
finds. Most fundamentally, the proof of claim that had stymied the
Debtor's plan of reorganization was filed by the Fund, not Local 1.
Without making any rulings on any party's legal entitlement in the
absence of agreement, Local 1 did not control the Fund and had no
ability to force the Fund to accept a cure upon assumption that is
less than prompt payment of the entire default provided for under
section 365(b)(1).

According to the Court, there is no evidence that rejection of the
CBAs would hurt Local 1 or its members at all. To the contrary, if
rejection led to a confirmed plan that served as the backbone of a
reorganized VMR, rejection would be the catalyst for dozens of
union jobs to survive at essentially the same rates of compensation
and benefits that they had previously enjoyed. All that rejection
would do is leave the Fund as an unsecured creditor with rights to
assert a claim based on a rejected contract. Some of the Fund's
claim may be entitled to priority, and the rest of the Fund's
claim, if allowed, would be a general unsecured claim.

Local 1 seems to suggest in its opposition brief that there are no
circumstances in which the Debtor could accomplish its goal --
which is simply to pay whatever priority amount exists
within the Fund's claim as a priority claim and treat the remainder
as a general unsecured claim. It argues that this would be a
"retroactive modification" of the CBA that is not permitted by
Section 1113 and that VMR is asking this Court to wipe out debts
owed to the Trust Funds. But that is incorrect. Local 1's position,
too, defies the Bankruptcy Code. Rejection of the CBA would create
claims, if at all, as of the petition date.

The Court says to the extent Local 1 is arguing that section 1113
only permits modifications to specific terms of CBAs, rather than
flat-out rejection of such agreements, its argument belies the
statute.

It is critical to understand that as part of the statutorily
directed give-and-take of section 1113, a union cannot demand the
impossible from a debtor.

In this case, the Debtor asked for the wrong thing when it started
the section 1113 process and did not properly follow the procedural
requirements of the statute. Because the Debtor did not properly
follow Congress's exacting procedures, the Debtor's motion is
denied without prejudice -- but if the Debtor follows the proper
procedure, a follow-up motion seeking rejection of the CBA (if one
is necessary because consensus cannot be reached in the interim) is
highly likely to be granted.

Judge Slade holds, "I have reviewed the docket and the pleadings
and considered the evidence presented by the parties at the
evidentiary hearing. From that information it appears that the CBA
will need to be rejected. If it is not, no plan of reorganization
is possible, VMR will likely shut down permanently, and all VMR
employees will lose their jobs. So, it should be in everyone's
interest to permit the CBA to be rejected and agree on go-forward
terms of employment for Local 1- affiliated VMR employees. I am
hopeful that, upon reviewing this opinion, the parties will sit
down, consider the interests they should be considering, and come
to agreement."

A copy of the Court's decision is available at
https://urlcurt.com/u?l=w886XD from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About VMR Contractors

VMR Contractors, Inc. is in the business of supplying and
installing rebar for road construction projects.  

VMR Contractors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 22-14211) on
Dec. 8, 2022, with $500,001 to $1 million in assets and $1 million
to $10 million in liabilities. Vincent Roberson, president of VMR
Contractors, signed the petition.

Judge Benjamin Goldgar oversaw the case.

The Debtor is represented by William J. Factor, Esq., at The Law
Office of William J. Factor, Ltd.




WALS TRANSPORT: Seeks to Hire Slocum Law as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Wals Transport, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee to employ Slocum Law as
counsel.

The firm's services include:

     a. advising the Debtor as to the rights, duties, and powers as
Debtor-in Possession;

     b. preparing and filing statements and schedules, plans, and
other documents and pleadings necessary to be filed by the Debtor
in this proceeding;

     c. representing the Debtor at all hearings, meetings of
creditors, conferences, trials, and any other proceedings in this
case; and

     d. performing such other legal services as may be necessary in
connection with this case.

Keith Slocum, Esq., an attorney at Slocum Law, will be paid $475
per hour for time spent in court, and $425 per hour for time spent
out of court. The paralegals are billed $150 per hour.

Prior to the petition date, the firm received a total of $16,738,
as retainer.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Keith D. Slocum, Esq., a partner at Slocum Law, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Keith D. Slocum, Esq.
     Slocum Law
     370 Mallory Station Road Suite 504
     Franklin TN, TN 37067
     Tel: (615) 656-3344
     Fax: (615) 647-0651
     Email: keith@keithslocum.com

              About Wals Transport, LLC

Wals Transport, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Tenn. Case No. 3:25-bk-01256) on March 25, 2025. The Debtor
hires Slocum Law as counsel.


WOODLAND PLACE: Hires Berger Singerman as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Woodland Place Apartments, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida to employ
Berger Singerman LLP to handle its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Edward J. Peterson                 $600 per hour
     Of Counsel & Associate Attorneys   $450 to $675
     Legal Assistants/Paralegals        $125 to $425

In addition, the firm will seek reimbursement for expenses
incurred.

Mr. Peterson disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Edward J. Peterson, Esq.
     Berger Singerman LLP
     401 East Jackson Street, Suite 3300
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: (813) 498-3400
     Fax: (813) 527-3705
     Email: epeterson@bergersingerman.com

              About Woodland Place Apartments, LLC

Woodland Place Apartments, LLC is a single asset real estate debtor
(as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)). The company is based in
Pensacola, Fla.

Woodland Place Apartments filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Fla. Case No. 24-30073) on February 1, 2024, with $1 million to $10
million in both assets and liabilities. Judge Jerry C. Oldshue, Jr.
oversees the case.

Edward J. Peterson, III, Esq. at Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns,
LLP represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


WORLD OF MISTRY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: World of Mistry, LLC
        5900 Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 435
        Van Nuys, CA 91411

Business Description: World of Mistry, LLC is a single-asset real
                      estate debtor, as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: April 11, 2025

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 25-10602

Judge: Hon. Victoria S Kaufman

Debtor's Counsel: Ron Bender, Esq.
                  LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & GOLUBCHIK L.L.P.
                  2818 La Cienega Ave.
                  Los Angeles, CA 90034
                  Tel: (310) 229-1234
                  Fax: (310) 229-1244
                  E-mail: rb@lnbyg.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Amit Syal as manager.

The Debtor indicated in the petition that there are no unsecured
creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free on
PacerMonitor at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/UELRP2A/World_of_Mistry_LLC__cacbke-25-10602__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


WST INDUSTRIES: Hires Everett Gaskins Hancock as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
WST Industries, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of North Carolina to employ Everett
Gaskins Hancock Tuttle Hash, LLP as bankruptcy counsel.

The firm will render these services:

     (a) undertake any and all steps and actions necessary to
authorize the use of cash collateral under Sec. 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code, if applicable;

     (b) advise the Debtor concerning its powers and duties in the
continued management, operation, and reorganization of its
business;

     (c) review any claims asserted against the Debtor by its
creditors, equity holders, and parties in interest;

     (d) represent the Debtor's interests at the Meeting of
Creditors under Sec. 341 of the Bankruptcy Code, and at any other
hearing or conference scheduled in the bankruptcy case before the
court related to the Debtor;

     (e) attend any meetings, conferences, and negotiations with
representatives of creditors and other parties in interest;

     (f) review and examine, if necessary, any transfers that may
be avoided as preferential or fraudulent transfers under the
appropriate provisions of the Bankruptcy Code;

     (g) take any necessary actions to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate;

     (h) prepare, on behalf of the Debtor all motions,
applications, answers, orders, reports, and pleadings necessary to
the administration of the bankruptcy estate;

     (i) prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, any plan of
reorganization, disclosure statement, and all related agreements
and/or documents, and take any necessary actions on behalf of the
Debtor to obtain confirmation of such plan of reorganization and
approval of such disclosure statement;

     (j) represent the Debtor in connection with any potential
post-petition financing;

     (k) advise the Debtor in connection with the sale or
liquidation, if applicable, of any assets and property to third
parties;

     (l) appear before the court, or any such appellate court and
the Office of the Bankruptcy Administrator to protect the interests
of the Debtor and the bankruptcy estate;

     (m) represent the Debtor with respect to any general,
corporate, or transactional matters that arise during the course of
the administration of the bankruptcy case; and

     (n) assist and advise the Debtor with respect to negotiation,
documentation, implementation, consummation, and closing of any
corporate transactions.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     William H. Kroll, Attorney    $400 per hour
     James M. Hash, Attorney       $400 per hour
     Andrew Simpson, Attorney      $275 per hour
     Mindy T. Lee, Paralegal       $135 per hour

In addition, the firm will seek reimbursement for expenses
incurred.

The firm received from the Debtor the amount of $5,000 on October 1
5,2024; $5,000 on December 31,2024; $5,000 on February 27, 2025;
and $7,500 on March 27, 2025.

Mr. Kroll disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
     
     William H. Kroll, Esq.
     Everett Gaskins Hancock Tuttle Hash, LLP
     220 Fayetteville Street, Suite 300
     Raleigh, NC 27602
     Tel: (919) 755-0025
     Fax: (919) 755-0009
     Email: bill@eghlaw.com

              About WST Industries, LLC

WST Industries LLC specializes in providing custom metal parts and
assemblies for industries such as automation, life sciences,
pharmaceuticals, and automotive. The Company offers services like
laser cutting, machining, welding, and metal reshaping, with
capabilities for both prototype and mass production. WST Industries
operates from a 31,000 sq. ft. facility equipped with advanced
technology to meet diverse customer needs.

WST Industries LLC sought relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. Case No. 25-01123) on March 28, 2025. In
its petition, the Debtor reports total assets of $492,708 and total
liabilities of $2,290,784.

Honorable Bankruptcy Judge Pamela W. McAfee handles the case.

The Debtor is represented by William Kroll, Esq. at EVERETT GASKINS
HANCOCK TUTTLE HASH LLP.


XRC LLC: Hires Ausley & McMullen as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
XRC, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida to employ Ausley & McMullen, P.A. as
special litigation counsel.

The Debtor needs the firm's legal assistance pertaining to civil
collection matters and construction claim issues

The firm will be paid at the rate of $300 to $325 per hour.

The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Prior to the Petition Date, Matt Appell individually paid the firm
a retainer in the amount of $10,000.

Anthony Tilton, Esq., a partner at Ausley & McMullen, P.A.,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Anthony Tilton, Esq.
     Ausley & McMullen, P.A.
     123 S Calhoun St.
     Tallahassee, FL 32301
     Tel: (850) 224-9115
     Fax: (850) 222-7560

              About XRC, LLC

XRC, LLC offers residential and commercial roofing services.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 24-05911) on October 31,
2024. In the petition signed by Matthew P. Appell, managing member,
the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Grace E. Robson oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by:

   Justin M. Luna, Esq.
   Latham, Luna, Eden & Beaudine, LLP
   Tel: (407) 481-5800
   Email: jluna@lathamluna.com


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Randy Antoni, Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante,
Rousel Elaine Tumanda, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Psyche A. Castillon,
Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and
Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2025.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The single-user TCR subscription rate is $1,400 for six months
or $2,350 for twelve months, delivered via e-mail.  Additional
e-mail subscriptions for members of the same firm for the term
of the initial subscription or balance thereof are $25 each per
half-year or $50 annually.  For subscription information, contact
Peter A. Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***