---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, February 15, 2022, Vol. 26, No. 45

                            Headlines

ARCHDIOCESE OF SANTA FE: Earns $1.7 Million From Second Auction
AAIM CARE: Case Summary & Five Unsecured Creditors
AAR CORP: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'BB' ICR
ADIENT PLC: S&P Raises ICR to 'BB-', Off CreditWatch, Outlook Pos.
AIRSEATRANS LLC: Landlord Icon Keystone Says Plan Not Feasible

ALIERA COMPANIES: Feb. 17 Deadline Set for Panel Questionnaires
AMERICAN EAGLE: Court Approves Florida Facility Sale Plans
BARD COLLEGE: S&P Affirms 'BB+' Rating on 2020A/B Revenue Debt
BIZGISTICS INC: Unsecureds to Recover 70% in Subchapter V Plan
BLUE STAR: Unit Acquires Crab Business From Gault Seafood for $359K

BOY SCOUTS: Negotiators Reach Bankruptcy Deal With Survivors' Attys
BRAZOS ELECTRIC: In Bankruptcy Showdown w/ ERCOT Over $2B Charge
BRICK HOUSE: Plan Solicitation Period Extended to April 18
BUCKINGHAM HEIGHTS: Exclusivity Period Extended to April 6
CALPLANT I: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to June 2

CENTURY ALUMINUM: Dimensional Fund Reports 4.2% Equity Stake
CENTURY ALUMINUM: Unit Increases Credit Facility to $80 Million
CENTURY ALUMINUM: Vanguard Group Has 6.2% Stake as of Dec. 31
CITIUS PHARMACEUTICALS: Incurs $9.2M Net Loss in First Quarter
CURTISS COURTYARD: Case Summary & Eight Unsecured Creditors

DEL MAR: Fitch Rates USD37.1MM Rev. Bonds 'BB-', Outlook Negative
DELCATH SYSTEMS: SilverArc, Devesh Gandhi Report 0% Equity Stake
DIXIE CENTERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
EAGLEFORD RECYCLING: Unsecureds to Split $150K over 5 Years
EDGEWATER HOLDINGS: Seeks Ch. 11 Bankruptcy to Stop Foreclosure

EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE: Fitch Withdraws Ratings
ELBA LUCERO FAMILY: Taps Belvedere Legal as Bankruptcy Counsel
FIRSTENERGY CORP: Agrees to Reforms, to Settle Shareholders Suits
FORTEM RESOURCES: Seeks Brief Extension to File Bankruptcy Plan
GAMESTOP CORP: Vanguard Group Holds 7.77% of Class A Shares

GIRARDI & KEESE: Crash Attorneys Deny Acting in Bad Faith
HANESBRANDS INC: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR, Outlook Stable
HERTZ CORP: Accused Thousands of Car Renters of Theft
HIGHWAY TO HEAVEN: Taps Gotfredson & Associates as Legal Counsel
INNERLINE ENGINEERING: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES: Douglas Singer Reports 6.98% Equity Stake
INW MANUFACTURING: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CCC+', Outlook Negative
JASON HOLDINGS: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Issuer-Credit Rating
JC STRENGTH: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to July 5
LATAM AIRLINES: Asks Court Approval for Backstop Financing Deal

LATAM AIRLINES: Asks Court Okay to Backstop Rights Offering
LATAM AIRLINES: Searches for Lenders to Refinance Bankruptcy Loan
LAUREATE EDUCATION: Moody's Assigns B1 CFR, Rates 1st Lien Debt Ba3
LAUREATE EDUCATION: S&P Assigns 'B+' ICR, Outlook Stable
LEGACY AT WILLOW: Fitch Cuts IDR to 'BB+', On Watch Negative

LTL MANAGEMENT: Lite DePalma Represents DiSanto Canadian Claimant
LTL MANGEMENT: Says Chapter 11 Ideal Response for Talc Claims
MAJOR MODEL: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
MARRONE BIO: Ardsley Advisory, et al., Report 10.35% Equity Stake
MEN'S WEARHOUSE: Moody's Affirms Caa1 CFR, Alters Outlook to Pos.

MORAN FOODS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC+' on Weak Performance
MOVIMIENTO PENTECOSTAL: Exclusivity Period Extended to May 2
NABORS INDUSTRIES: Posts $114 Million Net Loss in Fourth Quarter
OSCEOLA FENCE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PFO GLOBAL: Contract Fight of VSP Stays in Bankruptcy Court

PROSPECT-WOODWARD: Exclusivity Period Extended to Feb. 26
PUERTO RICO: Has Plans of Recovering From Bankruptcy
PURDUE PHARMA: Sacklers Plan to Add $1-Bil. to Opioid Settlement
PURE BIOSCIENCE: All Three Proposals Passed at Annual Meeting
QUANTUM CORP: BlackRock Has 6.6% Equity Stake as of Dec. 31

QUANTUM CORP: Senvest, Richard Mashaal Report 5.26% Equity Stake
RALEY'S: S&P Withdraws 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating
RIVERFRONT CRUISE: Dept. of Revenue Opposes Reorganizing Plan
SCIENTIFIC GAMES: Vanguard Group Has 9.49% Stake as of Dec. 31
STONEWAY CAPITAL: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Feb. 28

SYNIVERSE HOLDINGS: S&P Places 'B-' ICR on CreditWatch Negative
VEROBLUE FARMS: Bankruptcy Lingers as Investor Challenges Plan
VISTAGEN THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $10.5M Net Loss in Third Quarter
WCOP INC: April 7 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
WHITE RABBIT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

[*] Chapter 11 Attractive to International Airlines
[*] Sen. Whitehouse Closes Corporate Bankruptcy Abuse Hearings
[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet

                            *********

ARCHDIOCESE OF SANTA FE: Earns $1.7 Million From Second Auction
----------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Ruggles of San Antonio Express News reports that the
Archdiocese of Santa Fe made close to $1.7 million from its second
online auction, an auctioneer's representative said Friday,
February 22, 2022.

Money from the auction will go to a potential settlement agreement
with more than 400 victims of child sexual abuse perpetrated over
decades by clergy members with ties to the archdiocese.  No
agreement has been reached and a third mediator has been brought in
for negotiations.

The archdiocese filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy more than three
years ago.

Insurance companies are expected to pay a big chunk of any
settlement reached. The archdiocese also is selling other
properties and seeking contributions.

Louis B. Fisher III of SVN Auction Services said his company
offered 86 packages of small properties. The auction ended Monday.
SVN also held an online for the archdiocese last year, resulting in
about $1.4 million.

"I think it's a very good day for the archdiocese overall," Fisher
said Friday, February 11, 2022.

All the properties are vacant and were donated to the church by
members, he said. The auctioneer bundled multiple properties in
more than 15 New Mexico counties to form packages.

Fisher said 402 bidders registered for the online auction, which
started Jan. 31. The bidders, from 17 states and Canada, placed 856
bids on 75 to 80 packages. A few of the 86 packages received no
bids and will be distributed in a cleanup sale, he said.

"We've gotten most of the contracts back," he said. "There are a
few [for which] we haven't gotten the fully executed contract
back."

He said the archdiocese has minimal expenses to pay from the $1.7
million. The archdiocese will pay a fee related to closing of $500
per package, which would cost roughly $37,500 to $40,000.

The auction company, which is based in Florida and Louisiana,
received compensation in commissions from the buyers.

              About the Archdiocese of Santa Fe

The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa Fe --
https://www.archdiosf.org/ -- is an ecclesiastical territory or
diocese of the southwestern region of the United States in the
state of New Mexico. At present, the Archdiocese of Santa Fe covers
an area of 61,142 square miles. There are 93 parish seats and 226
active missions throughout this area.

The Archdiocese of Santa Fe sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.N.M. Case No. 18-13027) on Dec. 3, 2018, to deal with child abuse
claims. It reported total assets of $49,184,579 and total
liabilities of $3,700,000 as of the bankruptcy filing. Judge David
T. Thuma oversees the case.

The archdiocese tapped Elsaesser Anderson, Chtd. and Walker &
Associates, P.C., as bankruptcy counsel, Stelzner, Winter,
Warburton, Flores, Sanchez & Dawes, P.A as special counsel, and
REDW LLC as accountant.


AAIM CARE: Case Summary & Five Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: AAIM Care, LLC
           d/b/a Columbia Asthma & Allergy Clinic
        8740 SE Sunnybrook Blvd
        Suite 300
        Clackamas, OR 97015

Business Description: AAIM Care is a provider of allergy and
                      asthma solutions.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 14, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Oregon

Case No.: 22-30228

Judge: Hon. Teresa H. Pearson

Debtor's Counsel: Theodore J. Piteo, Esq.
                  MICHAEL D. O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
                  12909 SW 68th Parkway, Suite 160
                  Portland, OR 97223
                  Tel: 503-786-3800
                  Fax: 503-272-7796
                  E-mail: enc@pdxlegal.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Sanjeev Jain as member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's five unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/RW57NDQ/AAIM_CARE_LLC__orbke-22-30228__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


AAR CORP: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'BB' ICR
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to positive from stable and
affirmed its 'BB' issuer credit rating on AAR Corp.

The positive outlook reflects that credit metrics could remain
strong if AAR maintains a more conservative financial policy than
S&P assumes.

AAR's credit metrics will likely remain strong in 2022.Revenue and
earnings declined significantly in fiscal year 2020 (ended May 31)
because of the pandemic's impact on air travel. Commercial
aerospace maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) and parts sales
accounted for about 60% of pre-pandemic revenue. This decline,
along with the company drawing on its revolver to boost liquidity
as a precaution, weakened funds from operations (FFO) to debt to
14%. AAR repaid a significant portion of revolver borrowings in
2021, and repaid its Canadian term loan in 2022 with cash on hand.
Improving strong cash flow, which benefited from government grants,
lifted FFO to debt to about 61%. Demand from airlines has started
to recover in 2022, though the benefit to revenue is somewhat
offset by the impact of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, from
which AAR generated sales of $67 million in 2021, primarily from
its Worldwide Aviation Support Services (WASS) Department of State
contract. S&P said, "We expect FFO to debt of 63%-68% and free
operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt of 20%-25% this year. However,
the company has not pursued shareholder returns or acquisitions
since the onset of the pandemic. We expect these could be on the
table after the board of directors authorized share repurchases
during the company's second quarter (ended Nov. 30, 2021). We
forecast FFO to debt of 32%-37% and FOCF to debt of 7%-12% in
2023."

The positive outlook on AAR reflects that credit metrics have
improved since weakening significantly in 2020, due to better
earnings, continued cash flow generation, and a conservative
financial policy. S&P said, "We expect FFO to debt of 63%-68% and
FOCF to debt of 20%-25% in 2022. However, we believe the company is
unlikely to maintain these strong credit measures as it pursues
share repurchases and acquisitions. We expect both will weaken in
2023, with FFO to debt of 32%-37% and FOCF to debt of 7%-12%."

S&P could raise the rating over the next 12 months if the company's
FFO to debt is about 40% or more and FOCF to debt is above 20%, and
it expects these measures to remain there. This would likely be due
to:

-- The company resuming shareholder returns and acquisitions, but
remaining fairly conservative;

-- Demand recovering as expected; and

-- Continued strong free cash flow generation.

Although less likely, S&P could also raise the rating if adjusted
EBITDA margin improves above 10% and S&P expects it to remain
there.

S&P could revise the outlook back to stable in the next 12 months
if FFO to debt of declines below 35% and S&P expects it to remain
there. This could occur if:

-- The company pursues a more aggressive financial policy;

-- Commercial air travel does not improve as expected due to the
continuing impact of the coronavirus pandemic;

-- Margins weaken on labor, supply chain, or inflationary
pressures; or

-- Cash flow weakens.



ADIENT PLC: S&P Raises ICR to 'BB-', Off CreditWatch, Outlook Pos.
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on Adient PLC to
'BB-' from 'B+' and removed all ratings from CreditWatch with
positive implications, where S&P placed them on March 12, 2021. The
outlook is positive.

S&P said, "At the same time, we raised our issue-level rating on
Adient's secured debt to 'BB+' from 'BB-' and revised our recovery
rating to '1' from '2', indicating our expectation of very high
recovery (90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%) in the event of a
payment default. And we raised our issue-level rating on Adient's
unsecured debt to 'BB-' from 'B' and revised our recovery rating to
'4' from '5', indicating our expectation of average recovery
(30%-50%; rounded estimate: 30%).

"The positive outlook reflects the potential for a higher rating
over the next 12 months if we expect Adient will maintain debt to
EBITDA below 3x and FOCF to debt well above 10%."

Adient has completed the sale of its Yanfeng Adient Seating Co.
Ltd. (YFAS) joint venture in China for $1.5 billion ($1.4 billion
after tax) and used the proceeds with cash on the balance sheet to
pay down debt.

Adient has used the proceeds from the sale of its YFAS joint
venture to pay down debt, improving its credit metrics and
confirming its commitment to reduce leverage. In 2021, the company
redeemed $800 million of senior secured notes. It recently entered
into a tender offer for its $600 million senior secured notes and
EUR177 million of its EUR1 billion senior unsecured bond. The debt
paydown should result in significant savings in interest expense.
It demonstrates the company's commitment to focus on using cash to
reduce leverage. As a result, S&P now expects leverage to fall
toward 3x in 2022 and below 2.5x in 2023. While FOCF is likely to
be limited in FY2022, S&P expects it will likely increase well
above 10% in 2023 as margins recover on higher volumes at the auto
OEMs.

S&P said, "We believe Adient has made significant progress in
restructuring its business and, while margins fell recently with
higher commodity costs and volatile production schedules, we expect
margins to increase substantially to the high-single-digit percents
in 2023. The lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have
reduced the ability of automakers to access the semiconductors
needed for production and increased volatility in production. At
the same time, prices of raw materials such as steel have surged
along with supply chain costs such as for shipping containers.
Thus, Adient's margins fell substantially from the first half of
its fiscal 2021. Still, we think the strong results in the first
half indicated significant progress in the company's launch cost
management and commercial discipline. We continue to expect raw
material prices to remain relatively high in early 2022, but the
company should pass through most of these costs to its OEM
customers over the next 12 months." This is partly because of
renewed pricing contracts in Europe effective in its fiscal second
quarter and ongoing negotiations with automakers whose businesses
have benefitted from strong car prices. A recovery in auto
production during 2022, with lesser production disruption toward
the second half, will substantially benefit Adient as highly
volatile production schedules are quite detrimental to a
"just-in-time" seating supplier.

Risks remain, including potentially higher labor costs as the
company increases headcount when volumes recover. While passing
through higher commodity costs is mostly a matter of time for high
value-added suppliers such as Adient, increasing labor and supply
chain costs can be challenging for parts suppliers. It has been
some time since companies faced a more inflationary environment.
This negotiation could become particularly difficult if its
automaker customers have to lower car prices meaningfully as supply
normalizes and consumer affordability gets tight over the next
12-24 months.

S&P said, "We will continue to monitor Adient's use of free cash
flow, but we view its financial policy as supportive of the rating.
The company already has a major position as the world's largest
seating supplier, so we don't expect a large merger or acquisition
in the near term. The company has also expressed its desire for
leverage to remain 1.5x-2x longer term (based on Adient's
calculations, which equates to roughly 2.1x-2.6x per S&P Global
Ratings estimates). In addition to some continued debt reduction,
we think the company will start to direct free cash flow to share
buybacks and potentially a dividend longer term.

"The positive outlook reflects the potential for a higher rating
over the next 12 months if we expect Adient will maintain debt to
EBITDA below 3x and generate FOCF to debt well above 10%.

"We could upgrade Adient within the next 12 months if EBITDA
margins recover during 2022 and we expect further recovery in 2023
to the high-single-digit percents. This would increase our
confidence that the company can lower and maintain leverage below
3x and sustainably increase FOCF to debt well above 10%. This could
occur if global volumes of auto production recovers and the company
continues to operate its plants more efficiently and maintain
discipline in its commercial contracts as it ramps up production.

"We could revise the outlook to stable within the next 12 months if
we expect debt to EBITDA to remain well above 3x or the
FOCF-to-debt ratio below 10% on a sustained basis. This could occur
if the company's margins and free cash flow fail to improve,
despite improving automaker volumes."



AIRSEATRANS LLC: Landlord Icon Keystone Says Plan Not Feasible
--------------------------------------------------------------
Landlord Icon Keystone ICP I Owner Pool 5 South FL, LLC, objects to
the confirmation of Subchapter V Plan of Debtor Airseatrans LLC.

Landlord objects to the Plan as the Debtor has been consistently
late with its rent payments in direct violation of the Agreed
Order. Additionally, it is entirely unclear whether the Debtor will
be able to make ongoing, timely payments after confirmation, given
the Debtor's current track record.

Furthermore, Landlord has an unsecured claim against the estate in
the amount of $466,827 (the "Arrearage") which represents pre
petition rent arrearage and the amounts due pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement (Claim #11) (the "Claim").

Landlord claims that the Debtor acknowledges the Arrearage in the
Plan and proposes a 9-month repayment schedule starting February
2022. However, the Plan is silent as to the treatment of Landlord's
Claim, despite the fact that the projected financial information
provided on the Plan reflects rent and arrearage payments to
Landlord. This silence must be remedied.

Landlord points out that nothing in Debtor's monthly operating
reports provides any indication that the Debtor will be able to
make the supposed payments. It is unrealistic to think that a
company with a net cash flow of $6,865 for December and -$193 for
November is going to be able to somehow pay $500,000 in additional
arrearage payments over the next 9 months based on the hope that
these two holidays, alone, will fund these substantial cure
payments.

Landlord asserts that the Debtor's proposed reliance on
substantially increased revenues in February and May as a result of
Valentine's Day and Mother's Day, respectively, is speculative, at
best. While it is likely that, given the Debtor's business, these
months will be solid, there is nothing in the Plan's budget to
support the substantial increases in revenues projected for these
months. At this time, it appears the proposed revenue increases are
merely speculation.

Landlord further asserts that the Debtor has not demonstrated the
ability to pay the debt before or after the bankruptcy filing, or
to execute a plan to find another long-term solution, such as
alternative financing. Unfortunately, the Debtor has made these
promises before and has been unsuccessful, which resulted in the
filing of this bankruptcy. The Debtor proposes nothing in its Plan
which indicates the outcome will be different this time. As
consequence, the Debtor cannot prove its Plan is feasible as
required by Section 1129(a)(11).

A full-text copy of Landlord's objection dated Feb. 10, 2022, is
available at https://bit.ly/3BjIxtS from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorneys for Icon Keystone ICP:

     Nicolette Corso Vilmos
     Florida Bar No. 0469051
     NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP
     390 North Orange Avenue, Suite 1400
     Orlando, FL 32801
     Telephone: 407.839.4200
     Facsimile: 407.425.8377

                     About Airseatrans LLC

Airseatrans LLC -- https://www.airseatrans.com/ -- is an
international freight forwarder with in-house customs brokerage.
It offers door to door logistics, air freight and ocean freight,
ground transportation, courier services, free estimates, shipment
tracking, customs brokerage, on-site art handling and supervision,
packing and crating services.

Airseatrans sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-17747) on Aug. 9,
2021.  In the petition signed by Luis Eduardo Pineres, Jr.,
authorized representative, the Debtor disclosed $262,921 in assets
and $2,462,625 in liabilities.

The Honorable Robert A. Mark is the case judge.

The law firm of Gamberg & Abrams serves as the Debtor's legal
counsel.


ALIERA COMPANIES: Feb. 17 Deadline Set for Panel Questionnaires
---------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Trustee is soliciting members to serve on an
official committee of equity security holders in the bankruptcy
case of The Aliera Companies, Inc. et al.

If a party wishes to be considered for membership on any official
committee that is appointed, it must complete a Questionnaire
available at https://bit.ly/3sGKnB7 and return it to
Rosa.Sierra@usdoj.gov at the Office of the United States Trustee so
that it is received no later than 4:00 p.m., on Feb. 17, 2022.

If the U.S. Trustee receives sufficient creditor interest in the
solicitation, it may schedule a meeting or telephone conference for
the purpose of forming a committee.

                    About Aliera Companies

Aliera Companies Inc. is focused on providing a full spectrum of
revolutionary options and services to a multitude of industries
that fit every need and budget. The company provides services to
support its  subsidiaries which focus on the unique aspects of the
health care industry.

Plaintiffs in a case -- docketed as Hanna Albina and Austin
Willard, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, v. The Aliera Companies, Inc., Trinity Healthshare,
Inc. and Oneshare Health, LLC Unity Healthshare, LLC, Case No.
20-CV-00496, (E.D. Ky., Dec. 11, 2020) -- filed an involuntary
petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code against Aliera
Cos. (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 21-11548) on Dec. 5, 2021.

Joseph H. Huston, Jr., Esq., of STEVENS & LEE, P.C., is the
petitioners/plaintiffs' counsel.         

Aliera Companies Inc. sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ga. Case No. 21-59493) on Dec. 21, 2021. In the petition
signed by Katie Goodman as authorized officer, Aliera Companies
Inc. estimated assets between $1 million and $10 million and
estimated liabilities of $500 million and $1 billion. J. Robert
Williamson, Esq., of SCROGGINS & WILLIAMSON, P.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.



AMERICAN EAGLE: Court Approves Florida Facility Sale Plans
----------------------------------------------------------
Vince Sullivan of Law360 reports that nursing home chain American
Eagle Delaware Holding Co. LLC gained approval from a Delaware
bankruptcy judge Thursday, February 10, 2022, for a sale plan that
will allow it to select a stalking horse bidder by the end of the
month with hopes of closing a sale on a Florida property in April
2022.

During a videoconference, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge J. Kate Stickles
said she believed the proposed bidding procedures offered the best
chance for the debtor to complete a value-maximizing sale of its
Vista Lake assisted living facility in Florida and approved the
timeline and plan for the transaction.

On February 11, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order
approving the Bid Procedures, which set the key dates and times
related to the sale of the Debtors' assets.

Interested bidders are required to submit qualified bids in
writing, on or before March 28, 2022 at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing
Eastern Time).  If the Debtors receive two or more qualified bids
(including a Stalking Horse Bid), the auction will be conducted on
March 31, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time).

A hearing will be held to approve the sale of the assets to the
successful bidder before the Honorable J. Kate Stickles, at the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 824 N. Market
Street, 3rd Floor, Courtroom No. 7, Wilmington, Delaware 19801,
will be held on April 7, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern
Time).

                         About American Eagle

Established in 2018, Eagle Senior Living --
https://www.eagleseniorliving.org/ -- is a non-profit provider of
senior living services across the United States, providing care on
a daily basis to approximately 1,000 residents.  Eagle Senior
Living and related entities operate 15 residential senior care
facilities located across the country, from Colorado, Minnesota,
Wisconsin, and Ohio to Alabama, Tennessee, and Florida.

On Jan. 14, 2022, American Eagle Delaware Holding Company LLC and
16 affiliated companies each filed a petition seeking relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
22-10028) to seek confirmation of their prepackaged plan.  The
Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge J. Kate Stickles.

Parent company American Eagle Lifecare Corporation and management
company Greenbrier Senior Living are not included in the Chapter 11
filing.  Greenbrier Senior Living continues to manage all of the
communities.

American Eagle Delaware Holding estimated assets and debt of $10
million to $50 million as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors are represented in the Chapter 11 cases by Polsinelli
PC as legal counsel.  FTI Consulting Inc. and Blueprint Healthcare
Real Estate Advisors, LLC, serve as financial advisor and real
estate advisor, respectively.  Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC is
the claims agent and administrative advisor.


BARD COLLEGE: S&P Affirms 'BB+' Rating on 2020A/B Revenue Debt
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings has revised its outlook to positive from
negative and affirmed its 'BB+' long-term rating on Dutchess County
Local Development Corporation, N.Y.'s series 2020A tax-exempt and
series 2020B taxable revenue debt, issued for Bard College.

"The positive outlook revision reflects considerable growth in
Bard's balance sheet over the past three fiscal years in addition
to improving demand as full-time equivalent enrollment grew 7% in
fall 2021 with further increases in enrollment for fall 2022
anticipated," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Sean Wiley.

Founded in 1860 to train clergymen, Bard is a private college in
New York's Hudson Valley, about 90 miles north of New York City.



BIZGISTICS INC: Unsecureds to Recover 70% in Subchapter V Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bizgistics, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida an Amended Subchapter V Plan of
Liquidation dated Feb. 10, 2022.

As of the Petition Date (September 12, 2021), the Debtor was
operating as a contractor for FedEx pursuant to an Independent
Service Provider (ISP) Agreement. The Debtor was responsible for
the last mile delivery of packages for three zip codes in
Jacksonville, Florida.

The ISP Agreement under which the Debtor operated was purchased
from Banner Delivery, Inc. ("BDI") in December of 2020. As part of
the acquisition, the Debtor also purchased all of the assets and
ongoing business operations of BDI pursuant to an asset purchase
agreement (the "Banner APA"). The Debtor financed this acquisition
with a $1,484,000 million loan from ReadyCap Lending, LLC.

The Debtor believes its acquisition of the ISP Agreement was
effectuated through wrongdoings and misrepresentations by various
parties, including but not limited to Banner, Banner Delivery and
FedEx. The Debtor reserves the right to pursue Cause(s) of Action
postconfirmation relating to its acquisition of the ISP Agreement
and the Banner APA.

On December 10, 2021, the Court approved the sale of 12 vehicles
pursuant to those certain Emergency Motions to Sell, bringing in
$271,500.00 to the estate. These were sold with ReadyCap's explicit
consent. The Debtor also attempted to sell the remaining vehicles
and personal property as part of an orderly liquidation of the
Debtor's remaining assets. The Debtor was able to sell 2 additional
vehicles, also with ReadyCap's consent, and the Debtor is currently
holding $305,000 in the estate from the sale of vehicles with liens
notated in favor of ReadyCap. The Debtor had prospective buyers for
its remaining vehicles, but either ReadyCap wholly rejected the
offers or the prospective buyers walked away because the Debtor
could not obtain title information from ReadyCap.

The remaining assets of the estate are the Debtor's remaining
vehicles, Cash, Causes of Action, and minimal personal property and
equipment. ReadyCap asserts a lien on most of these assets, some of
which the Debtor disputes. The Debtor plans to file a claim
objection to ReadyCap's Claim No. 3 before confirmation, disputing,
inter alia, the extent of ReadyCap's alleged security interest. The
Net Sale Proceeds of the Debtor's assets will be liquidated and
remitted to Holders of Allowed Claims in accordance with the
priority scheme. To the extent applicable, all disposable income as
defined by § 1191(d) will be used to make distributions under the
Plan.

Class 1 Allowed Secured Claim of ReadyCap will be deemed satisfied
by the amounts it receives from (a) the Net Sale Proceeds from the
sale of ReadyCap Collateral; (b) the Auction Values of the
Abandoned Vehicles; (c) Cash Collateral; (d) the value of the
remaining Debtor equipment abandoned to ReadyCap; and (e) any other
assets or proceeds that the Court determines constitute ReadyCap
Collateral, at such actual amounts as determined by the Court or
otherwise agreed between the Debtor and ReadyCap.

Class 3 General Unsecured Claims will each receive its pro rata
share of any funds available from the liquidation of any
unencumbered assets and/or any recoveries from any Causes of
Action, as soon as practicable after payment in full of Allowed
Administrative Expense Claims, Allowed Class 1 Claims and Allowed
Class 2 Claims. Class 3 is impaired and entitled to vote.  The
allowed unsecured claims total $1,692,699. Unsecured creditors will
receive a distribution of 70% of their allowed claims.

Class 4 is comprised of all Equity Interests in the Debtor, which
are owned by Susan and Darrell Giles. The Giles will retain their
Equity Interests in the Debtor. No distributions will be made to
the Giles until the distributions to Allowed Administrative Expense
Claims, Allowed Class 1, Allowed Class 2 and Allowed Class 3 Claims
have been made in full. Class 4 is impaired.

This is a liquidating plan.  The remaining assets of the estate are
Cash, Causes of Action, disputed interests as to a Service Truck
and Service Trailer, and minimal equipment.  Any Cash identified as
Cash Collateral will be remitted to ReadyCap on the Effective Date
or as soon thereafter as ReadyCap is determined to have an Allowed
Claim. Tangible assets of the estate will either be surrendered to
ReadyCap or sold, and the Net Sale Proceeds will be used to fund
this Plan.

Banner Delivery, Inc., asserts an unsecured claim, relating to a
Promissory Note ($600,000), the Holdback ($150,000) and Vehicles
($110,000) (the "Service Truck") and (VIN#55YBE1821EN002935 and its
contents) (the "Service Trailer"). There is a bona fide dispute as
to the ownership of the Service Truck and Service Trailer, in which
both the Debtor and BDI claim an interest. The Debtor believes
there is no dispute that, following the execution of the APA, BDI
took a $64,000 insurance check of the Debtor's relating to the
Accident Truck, and thereafter took the Accident Truck itself,
despite the fact that rights to both the Accident Truck and related
insurance proceeds were acquired by the Debtor through the APA.

A full-text copy of the Amended Subchapter V Plan of Liquidation
dated Feb. 10, 2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3oLd5zn from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Megan W. Murray, Esq.
     Adam M. Gilbert, Esq.
     Underwood Murray, P.A.
     100 N. Tampa St., Suite 2325
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: (813) 540-8401
     Fax: (813) 553-5345
     Email: mmurray@underwoodmurray.com
            agilbert@underwoodmurray.com

                         About Bizgistics

Bizgistics, Inc., a freight transportation arrangement services
provider based in Rydal, Pa., filed a voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 21-02197) on Sept.
12, 2021, listing as much as $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Darrell Giles, chief executive officer and  director,
signed the petition.  

Judge Roberta A. Colton oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Underwood Murray PA as bankruptcy counsel, Erik
Johanson PLLC as special litigation counsel, and Redcross, Martin &
Associates, Inc., as accountant.


BLUE STAR: Unit Acquires Crab Business From Gault Seafood for $359K
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Pride Seafood, LLC, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of
Blue Star Foods Corp., entered into an asset purchase agreement
with Gault Seafood, LLC, and Robert J. Gault II, president of the
seller, pursuant to which Coastal acquired all of the seller's
right, title and interest in and to assets relating to the seller's
soft shell crab operations, including intellectual property,
equipment, vehicles and other assets used in connection with the
Business.  Coastal did not assume any liabilities in connection
with the acquisition.  The purchase price for the assets consists
of a cash payment in the amount of $359,250 and the issuance of
167,093 shares of common stock of the Company.  Those shares are
subject to a leak-out agreement pursuant to which the seller may
not sell or otherwise transfer the shares until Feb. 3, 2023.

Coastal also entered into a consulting agreement with Gault under
the terms of which Gault will provide consulting services to the
Purchaser at the rate of $100 per hour, however, the first 45 days
of services will be provided at no cost.  Gault also agreed not to
compete with Coastal and its affiliates for a period of five years
in any market in which Coastal is operating or is considering
operating or solicit employees, consultants, customers or suppliers
or in any way interfere with Coastal's business relationships for a
five-year period.  Gault is also bound by customary confidentiality
provisions.  The Consulting Agreement may be terminated by either
party upon five days written notice and by Coastal immediately for
cause.

In connection with the asset acquisition, Coastal will lease
certain space from Gault for $1,000 per month under a one-year
lease agreement and will continue to operate the acquired business
at such location in Beaufort, South Carolina unless a new facility
is earlier completed.

                         About Blue Star Foods

Blue Star Foods Corp. is a sustainable seafood company that
processes, packages and sells refrigerated pasteurized Blue Crab
meat, and other premium seafood products.  Its products are
currently sold in the United States, Mexico, Canada, the Caribbean,
the United Kingdom, France, the Middle East, Singapore and Hong
Kong.  The company headquarters is in Miami, Florida (United
States), and its corporate website is: http://www.bluestarfoods.com


Blue Star reported a net loss of $4.44 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, a net loss of $5.02 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2019, and a net loss of $2.28 million for the 12 months ended
Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $11.91
million in total assets, $6.36 million in total liabilities, and
$5.55 million in total stockholders' equity.

Houston, Texas-based MaloneBailey, LLP, the Company's auditor since
2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 15, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


BOY SCOUTS: Negotiators Reach Bankruptcy Deal With Survivors' Attys
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim Christensen of the Los Angeles Times reports that negotiators
for the Boy Scouts of America and lawyers for thousands of sexual
abuse survivors have struck an eleventh-hour deal to allow the
youth group's reorganization plan to move forward in Bankruptcy
Court.

The new plan does not immediately add money to a trust fund to be
shared by about 82,000 former Scouts who have filed claims.  But it
includes improvements to the claims process and enhancements to the
organization's child protection policies, according to terms of the
agreement.

The agreement removes major obstacles to the Scouts' reorganization
plan, but does not guarantee its success.  The plan must be
confirmed by a federal judge and still faces opposition from some
plaintiffs' attorneys and the U.S. trustee, the bankruptcy system's
watchdog, which has objected to several of its provisions.

The Scouts' previous offer of a $2.7-billion settlement, touted as
the largest of its kind in U.S. history, hit a major snag last
month when it failed to garner "overwhelming support" from the
nearly 54,000 abuse survivors who voted on it.

The plan needed a "yes" vote of about 75% to be confirmed by U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein, who has scheduled a
Feb. 22 hearing in Delaware.  It wound up just shy of that, with
about 73% approving.

The initial results capped a contentious voting period in which
plaintiffs' lawyers squared off against each other, with some
hailing the settlement offer as the best deal possible and others
denouncing it as woefully lacking.

The official tort claimants committee, appointed by the bankruptcy
trustee to represent the interests of all victims in the
proceedings, had been among the staunchest opponents.

But late Wednesday, February 9, 2022, a mediator in the case
announced in a court filing that various sides had agreed in
principle on a new deal.

"As a result, the TCC succeeded in reaching its goals of meaningful
child protection, independent governance of the Settlement Trust
and an enhanced compensation structure for survivors," said John
Humphrey, the committee co-chair.

"With these accomplishments in hand, the TCC recommends that all
survivors vote to accept the new and improved plan," he said.

In a statement Thursday, the Boy Scouts of America said that, with
the agreement, "all significant survivor constituencies now support
the BSA's plan."

"Moving forward, the goal of our financial restructuring process
remains the same: We are steadfast in our commitment to equitably
compensate survivors and preserve the mission of Scouting," it
said.

Significant opposition remains, however, from some plaintiffs'
attorneys who contend that the deal shortchanges the claimants and
the bankruptcy action is unconstitutional because it would provide
releases to some of the Scouts' chartering organizations and other
potentially liable parties.

"The new agreement does not change the fundamentally illegal nature
of the third-party releases contemplated under this plan," said
Gilion Dumas, a Portland, Ore., attorney whose comment echoed an
objection filed last month by the bankruptcy system watchdog.

Dumas contends the deal should void the last vote.

"The new agreement tries to change things so substantially that I
believe the court should require an entirely new solicitation and
vote of everyone," she said.

Timothy Kosnoff, a veteran sex abuse attorney and a vocal critic of
the settlement offer, said the new deal does not change his view
that the Chapter 11 reorganization should be scrapped and the Boy
Scouts of America liquidated.

"My takeaway is that this thing is still unconfirmable," he said.
"I think it's a really sad betrayal by even more law firms who held
themselves out to be champions of these survivors but who have now
capitulated."

Among those Kosnoff has targeted for criticism is the Coalition of
Abused Scouts for Justice, which has 18,000 members and says its
affiliated law firms represent more than 63,000 clients in the
bankruptcy. The group supported the initial offer and hailed the
new one as "a positive outcome" of intense negotiations.

"The $2.7-billion compensation fund built through the Coalition's
efforts during 2021 isn't the end," it said in a statement.  "We
are committed to working together with our plan partners to further
grow the fund, ensure key protections for current and future Scouts
and make certain that survivors receive the best and fastest avenue
to closure, as well as fair, just and equitable compensation."

The latest settlement agreement comes two years after the Boy
Scouts of America filed for bankruptcy protection in February 2020.
The action put a hold on hundreds of lawsuits to allow for the
negotiation of a global settlement and required new abuse claims to
be handled through the bankruptcy process rather than in state
courts.

A researcher hired by the Scouts to analyze its internal records in
2019 identified 7,819 suspected abusers and 12,254 victims -- a
fraction of the number who eventually filed claims.

By Nov. 16, 2020, the court-mandated filing deadline, more than
92,000 claims were submitted, many from accusers recruited by law
firms through TV and internet advertisements.  Some 10,000 claims
were later weeded out as duplicate filings or otherwise
invalidated.

The massive response far outstripped all expectations. Plaintiffs'
lawyers predicted that the number of claims and the total payouts
to settle them would easily eclipse those in the sex abuse scandal
that engulfed the U.S. Catholic Church more than a decade ago

At the time, Boy Scout leaders called the massive response
"gut-wrenching" and apologized in a statement.

"We are devastated by the number of lives impacted by past abuse in
Scouting and moved by the bravery of those who have come forward,"
it said. "We are heartbroken that we cannot undo their pain. ... We
are deeply sorry."

The Boy Scouts national organization and its local councils have
agreed to contribute about $820 million of the proposed settlement
amount, with nearly $1.6 billion coming from two major insurers,
and $250 million from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints and other sponsoring organizations.

Even that massive total would yield only “pennies on the
dollar” of the claims’ true value, according to opponents, who
have contended that it let the Boy Scouts and others of their
insurers off the hook for billions more in damages.

More than a dozen insurance companies have yet to contribute to the
proposed settlement and could now face individual lawsuits by
claimants, according to terms of the deal announced Wednesday.

Abuse survivors could also now pursue claims against the Scouts’
chartering organizations that have yet to settle, if they are not
in active negotiations to do that within a year.

"Our goal was to try to fix the BSA's proposed plan by making it
more fair to survivors. We think we have done that in this new
plan," said Jason Amala, whose law firm represents about 1,125
claimants in the bankruptcy.

Some claimants who voted last month against the initial proposal
will have to change their votes to "yes" to reach the 75%
threshold, but other lawyers in the case predicted that will
happen.

"It'll clearly go above 75%," said Paul Mones, Los Angeles attorney
who will sit on a seven-member Settlement Trust Advisory Committee
overseeing the victims' fund and the administration of claims.

Mones said the latest proposal includes modifications -- such as
allowing survivors to sue reticent insurance companies -- that
probably will add "many hundreds of millions of dollars" to the
pool of funds available to abuse survivors.

"This is not a panacea by any means, not even close to what these
men suffered," Mones said.  "Many men will be deprived of a full
and fulsome hearing in court.  However, this is better than what we
had before and it gives them a measure of justice considering all
the circumstances."

                About Boy Scouts of America

The Boy Scouts of America -- https://www.scouting.org/ -- is a
federally chartered non-profit corporation under title 36 of the
United States Code. Founded in 1910 and chartered by an act of
Congress in 1916, the BSA's mission is to train youth in
responsible citizenship, character development, and self-reliance
through participation in a wide range of outdoor activities,
educational programs, and, at older age levels, career-oriented
programs in partnership with community organizations. Its national
headquarters is located in Irving, Texas.

The Boy Scouts of America and affiliate Delaware BSA, LLC, sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-10343) on
Feb. 18, 2020, to deal with sexual abuse claims.

Boy Scouts of America was estimated to have $1 billion to $10
billion in assets and at least $500 million in liabilities as of
the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors have tapped Sidley Austin LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as Delaware counsel,
and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as financial advisor.
Omni Agent Solutions is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed a tort claimants' committee
and an unsecured creditors' committee on March 5, 2020.  The tort
claimants' committee is represented by Pachulski Stang Ziehl &
Jones, LLP, while the unsecured creditors' committee is represented
by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP.


BRAZOS ELECTRIC: In Bankruptcy Showdown w/ ERCOT Over $2B Charge
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf of Bloomberg Law reports that a bankrupt Texas electric
company's battle with the state’s grid operator over massive
financial losses from last 2021's historic winter storm threatens
to shock the state's energy market and launch a wave of similar
bankruptcies.

Brazos Electric Power Cooperative Inc., which filed Chapter 11 in
March 2021, was one of the first energy companies that sued to
reduce its exposure to multibillion dollar charges from grid
operator Electric Reliability Council of Texas Inc. (ERCOT) for
purchasing power during the storm.

ERCOT's "exorbitant and excessive" $1.9 billion bill plunged Brazos
from financial stability to insolvency nearly overnight, the
generation and transmission co-op says. Brazos says it incurred
losses because it didn't pass on the high costs to its members.

In a trial beginning later this February 2022, U.S. Bankruptcy
Judge David Jones will determine whether ERCOT has a legitimate
claim to the $1.9 billion it's seeking from Brazos, or whether the
grid operator must reduce its bill.

The outcome could influence numerous other lawsuits ERCOT is facing
and may drive other companies to file Chapter 11 either to avoid
paying the charges or get back what they believe was overpaid.

Any determination that Brazos was overcharged for electricity "will
have effects rippling far beyond" the co-op's case and shift the
burden to pay to other market participants, the Public Utilities
Commission of Texas warned in a court filing in Brazos' case. The
result "could lead to a domino effect of other market participants
filing bankruptcy to seek similar relief," the commission said.

Starting Feb. 13, 2021, a winter storm blanketed much of the
Lonestar State in snow and ice, and kept temperatures abnormally
low for the following week. The storm and its aftermath killed 246
people and left estimated economic damages of up to $130 billion,
according to state reports.

Over the course of seven days, the price of electricity in Texas
was more than 400 times the average price charged in 2020,
according to natural gas and electricity retailer Just Energy Group
Inc. The state’s wholesale market consummated $55 billion in
transactions for the week, an amount that normally would take four
years to be realized, Just Energy said in court filings.

In Texas' deregulated independent grid, generation companies
produce electricity that retailers buy and sell to about 26 million
individual customers. ERCOT, a nonprofit corporation, is
responsible for procuring energy within the state’s unique market
and supplies it to co-ops like Brazos. ERCOT also maintains
reliable operation of supply in the system. The grid operator
compares its function to that of an air traffic controller.

ERCOT's energy billing during the storm resulted in a handful of
bankruptcies among Texas energy co-ops and retailers, including
Brazos, Just Energy, Griddy Energy LLC, and Entrust Energy Inc.

Just Energy and Entrust Energy also are challenging ERCOT’s
electricity bills as part of their Chapter 11 cases.

                        Scarcity Conditions

During the storm, electricity demands skyrocketed, but frozen
equipment and pipelines prevented supply from keeping up.

ERCOT issued its highest level of emergency Feb. 15, directing
transmission operators to curtail service, or "load shed," to avoid
overwhelming the power grid. The Public Utilities Commission then
ordered ERCOT to set prices at the highest allowable rate—$9,000
per megawatt hour—to reflect the scarcity of power in the
market.

Temperatures finally rose enough Feb. 19 for the grid to
normalize.

The state government has since enacted measures to prevent another
disaster. But questions still linger over pricing decisions and
what went wrong last 2021.

"It's very hard to understand and appreciate the details of who did
what, when and why," said David Prager, head of the U.S.
restructuring advisory practice at Kroll LLC.

One of ERCOT’s main defenses has been that it's an arm of the
state and therefore can't be sued in federal court.

In a separate case brought in 2016 by generation company Panda
Power Funds, the Texas Supreme Court is expected to resolve whether
ERCOT has sovereign immunity.

"I think everyone wants to know is ERCOT accountable or can they
just do whatever they want?" said Leslie Thorne of Haynes and Boone
LLP, who represents Panda Power Funds in the case.

                          Early Answers

But the Brazos bankruptcy proceedings already are answering some of
those questions.

The Brazos case proceedings will allow other Texas power market
participants subjected to the same scarcity pricing to determine
whether they can find relief in bankruptcy court, Thorne said.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas in
October rejected ERCOT's motion to dismiss Brazos' lawsuit on
sovereign immunity and other grounds.

The bankruptcy court also ruled separately that ERCOT’s $1.9
billion claim against Brazos for electricity wasn't a debt incurred
in Brazos' ordinary course of business. As a result, ERCOT's claim
doesn't take precedence over creditors with general unsecured
claims in the bankruptcy, forcing ERCOT to split recoveries with
other unsecured creditors.

ERCOT also has argued that it simply followed PUC orders on
electricity prices.

"The orders dictated what the market price in the state of Texas
was for energy during the time that this order applied and that
applied during the entire winter storm," ERCOT attorney Jamil
Alibhai of Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr PC said at a Jan. 31 court
hearing in the Brazos case.

Yet ERCOT charged maxed-out prices for 33 hours after load shed had
ceased, resulting in a total $16 billion in overcharges, according
to an independent monitor hired by the state government.

But a win for Brazos could mean more payment obligations for other
energy market participants in the state.

Other Texas power generators have sought to intervene, saying they
will be forced bear the economic burden if the bankruptcy court
deems any of ERCOT’s winter storm charges invalid. ERCOT's system
includes “uplift” charges, which spread debt from defaults on
payments across the market.

"We're all in this strange market together," said Britta Stanton of
the Castañeda Firm, who's representing a pair of Texas electric
power generators in a state court case over pricing. "It's just a
mass procedural quagmire."

           About Brazos Electric Power Cooperative

Brazos Electric Power Cooperative Inc. is a 3,994-megawatt
transmission and generation cooperative which members' service
territory covers 68 counties from the Texas Panhandle to Houston.
It was organized in 1941 and the first cooperative formed in the
Lone Star state with the primary intent of generating and supplying
electrical power. At present, Brazos Electric is the largest
generation and transmission cooperative in the state and is the
wholesale power supplier for its 16 member-owner distribution
cooperatives and one municipal system.

Brazos Electric filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 21-30725)
on March 1, 2021. At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
assets of between $1 billion and $10 billion and liabilities of the
same range.

Judge David R. Jones oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP as bankruptcy
counsel, Foley & Lardner LLP and Eversheds Sutherland US LLP as
special counsel, Collet & Associates LLC as investment banker, and
Berkeley Research Group, LLC as financial advisor. Ted B. Lyon &
Associates, The Gallagher Law Firm, West & Associates LLP, Butch
Boyd Law Firm and Boyd Smith Law Firm, PLLC serve as special
litigation counsel. Stretto is the claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case on March 15, 2021. The
committee is represented by the law firms of Porter Hedges, LLP and
Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel, LLP. FTI Consulting, Inc. and
Lazard Freres & Co. LLC serve as the committee's financial advisor
and investment banker, respectively.


BRICK HOUSE: Plan Solicitation Period Extended to April 18
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Kevin Anderson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Utah extended the exclusivity period for Brick House Properties,
LLC to solicit acceptances for its Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization to April 18.  

                   About Brick House Properties

Brick House Properties, LLC owns two parcels of real property in
Riverton, Utah. It leases portions of the property to four related
persons and entities: (i) Our Journey School LLC (the
"Pre-Elementary School"); (ii) Our Journey, Inc. (the "Elementary
School"); (iii) Hidden Valais Ranch LLC (the "Farm"); and (iv)
Emily and Josh Aune.

Emily Aune is the sole member of the Debtor, and is also the sole
member and owner of the Farm.  She is a 90% owner in the
Pre-Elementary School.  The Elementary School is a 501(3)(c)
non-profit and is managed by a board which Emily and Josh are
members of.

Brick House Properties filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 20-26250) on Oct. 21, 2020, listing as
much as $1 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Kevin Anderson oversees the case.

Cohne Kinghorn, P.C. serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.

The Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization on
Nov. 6, 2020, and its disclosure statement detailing the plan on
Dec. 7, 2020.


BUCKINGHAM HEIGHTS: Exclusivity Period Extended to April 6
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sheri Bluebond of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California extended the exclusivity period for
Buckingham Heights Business Park to file its Chapter 11 plan to
April 6.  

Buckingham can solicit acceptances for the plan until to June 6.

              About Buckingham Heights Business Park

Culver City, Calif.-based Buckingham Heights Business Park (a
California Limited Partnership) filed a petition for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 21-17060) on Sept. 8, 2021,
listing up to $50 million in assets and up to $500,000 in
liabilities. Judge Sheri Bluebond oversees the case.   

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP and KB&T Tax & Consulting,
Inc. serve as the Debtor's legal counsel and accountant,
respectively.


CALPLANT I: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to June 2
--------------------------------------------------------
CalPlant I Holdco, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to extend the exclusivity period to file a
Chapter 11 plan to June 2, and the period to solicit acceptances
for the plan to Aug. 1.

The exclusivity period refers to the 120-day period during which
only the company can file a plan after a bankruptcy petition.  

The extension, if granted by the court, will give CalPlant more
time to infuse liquidity into its business, finalize the completion
of its manufacturing plant, and run a bidding process to sell its
business, according to a motion filed by the company in court.

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Feb. 16.

                          About CalPlant

CalPlant I, LLC -- http://www.eurekamdf.com/-- is a Northern
California-based company focused on manufacturing
sustainably-sourced building products, including the creation of
the world's first no-added-formaldehyde, rice straw-based medium
density fiberboard, Eureka MDF.  CalPlant and its predecessor
company, CalAg, LLC, have spent many years researching, developing,
and patenting a process to make high-quality MDF using annually
renewable rice straw as the feedstock, the disposal of which has
posed environmental issues in California for decades.

CalPlant I and CalPlant I Holdco, LLC sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-11302) on Oct. 5, 2021. The cases
are handled by Honorable Judge John T. Dorsey.

CalPlant I Holdco listed up to $100 million in assets and up to
$50,000 in liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing while CalPlant I
listed as much as $500 million in both assets and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Morrison & Foerster, LLP as bankruptcy counsel;
Morris James, LLP as local bankruptcy counsel; Paladin Management
Group as financial advisor; and KCoe Isom, LLP as auditor and tax
services provider. Prime Clerk, LLC is the claims, noticing and
administrative agent.


CENTURY ALUMINUM: Dimensional Fund Reports 4.2% Equity Stake
------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Dimensional Fund Advisors LP disclosed that as of Dec.
31, 2021, it beneficially owns 3,822,654 shares of common stock of
Century Aluminum Co, representing 4.2 percent of the shares
outstanding.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/354204/000035420422001687/SEC13G_Filing.htm

                  About Century Aluminum Company

Century Aluminum Company -- http://www.centuryaluminum.com-- is a
global producer of primary aluminum and operates aluminum reduction
facilities, or "smelters," in the United States and Iceland.

Century Aluminum reported a net loss of $123.3 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, a net loss of $80.8 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, and a net loss of $66.2 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $1.49 billion
in total assets, $515.5 million in total current liabilities,
$653.5 million in total noncurrent liabilities, and $320.2 million
in total shareholders' equity.


CENTURY ALUMINUM: Unit Increases Credit Facility to $80 Million
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nordural Grundartangi ehf., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Century
Aluminum Company, entered into an amendment to Nordural
Grundartangi's Revolving Credit Facility, dated Nov. 27, 2013, as
amended, with Landsbankinn hf., as lender.  

The amendment, among other things, increases the facility amount
from $50.0 million to $80.0 million, not to exceed 70% (increased
from 65%) of the most recently reported aggregate amount of
inventory and receivables, and also increases the margin applied to
outstanding loans from 2.95% to 3.05%, as disclosed in a Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                  About Century Aluminum Company

Century Aluminum Company -- http://www.centuryaluminum.com-- is a
global producer of primary aluminum and operates aluminum reduction
facilities, or "smelters," in the United States and Iceland.

Century Aluminum reported a net loss of $123.3 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, a net loss of $80.8 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, and a net loss of $66.2 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $1.49 billion
in total assets, $515.5 million in total current liabilities,
$653.5 million in total noncurrent liabilities, and $320.2 million
in total shareholders' equity.


CENTURY ALUMINUM: Vanguard Group Has 6.2% Stake as of Dec. 31
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Vanguard Group disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Dec. 31, 2021, it
beneficially owns 5,618,201 shares of common stock of Century
Aluminum Co., representing 6.23 percent of the shares outstanding.
A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/102909/000110465922016238/tv0025-centuryaluminumco.htm

                  About Century Aluminum Company

Century Aluminum Company -- http://www.centuryaluminum.com-- is a
global producer of primary aluminum and operates aluminum reduction
facilities, or "smelters," in the United States and Iceland.

Century Aluminum reported a net loss of $123.3 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, a net loss of $80.8 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, and a net loss of $66.2 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $1.49 billion
in total assets, $515.5 million in total current liabilities,
$653.5 million in total noncurrent liabilities, and $320.2 million
in total shareholders' equity.


CITIUS PHARMACEUTICALS: Incurs $9.2M Net Loss in First Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $9.23 million on zero revenue for the three months ended Dec.
31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $8.15 million on zero revenue
for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2020.

As of Dec. 31, 2021, the Company had $137.52 million in total
assets, $12.96 million in total liabilities, and $124.56 million in
total equity.

"We anticipate 2022 will be a year of important catalysts for
Citius.  The timeline for the I/ONTAK program remains on track,
with topline results anticipated in the first half of 2022,
followed by a planned BLA filing in the second half of the year.
Moreover, the FDA confirmed that no pediatric study will be
required for I/ONTAK, further de-risking this asset," stated Myron
Holubiak, president and chief executive officer of Citius
Pharmaceuticals.

"Covid-19 continues to pose a challenge to the Mino-Lok Phase 3
trial.  We remain committed to completing the trial this year and
believe we are well-positioned to continue our efforts as Covid-19
infections and hospitalizations subside, restrictions are lifted
and the overall environment for clinical trials improves.  These
efforts include active engagement with our existing sites, and
evaluation of additional trial sites.  We continue to believe that
there is a significant unmet medical need to salvage catheters so
that critically ill patients need not undergo the painful and
costly removal and replacement of a central venous line.  Our
primary focus remains to execute a plan that ensures we have a
robust dataset that maximizes the potential success of Mino-Lok,"
added Mr. Holubiak.

"To further support the launch of our two late-stage product
candidates, I/ONTAK and Mino-Lok, if approved, and to advance our
other pipeline programs, we have added several key regulatory,
clinical, commercial and manufacturing industry veterans to our
team.  Their expertise will help propel our activities to bring
these important products to market, and our strong balance sheet
continues to support these efforts.  We look forward to sharing our
value-creating milestones with our stakeholders in the coming
months," concluded Mr. Holubiak.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1506251/000121390022006429/f10q1221_citiuspharma.htm

                           About Citius

Headquartered in Cranford, NJ, Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. --
http://www.citiuspharma.com-- is a specialty pharmaceutical
company dedicated to the development and commercialization of
critical care products targeting unmet needs with a focus on
anti-infectives, cancer care and unique prescription products.

Citius reported a net loss of $23.05 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2021, a net loss of $17.55 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2020, and a net loss of $15.56 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $142.43
million in total assets, $9.65 million in total liabilities, and
$132.78 million total equity.


CURTISS COURTYARD: Case Summary & Eight Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Curtiss Courtyard, LLC
        9 Palmetto Drive
        Miami Springs, FL 33166

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 14, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida

Case No.: 22-11154

Judge: Hon. Robert A. Mark

Debtor's Counsel: Richard R. Robles, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD R. ROBLES, P.A.
                  905 Brickell Bay Drive
                  Suite 228
                  Miami, FL 33131
                  Tel: (305) 755-9200
                  Email: rrobles@roblespa.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Rafael D. Rodriguez as manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's eight unsecured creditors is available for
free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/OOG6AKA/Curtiss_Courtyard_LLC__flsbke-22-11154__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


DEL MAR: Fitch Rates USD37.1MM Rev. Bonds 'BB-', Outlook Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Del Mar Race Track Authority, CA's $37.1
million series 2015 revenue bonds at 'BB-'. The Rating Outlook is
Negative.

RATING RATIONALE

The rating affirmation reflects the elevated vulnerability of Del
Mar Race Track Authority's operating profile, which is impacted by
the accelerated decline in the California horse racing industry.
Fitch's rating case forecast indicates horse-racing operations will
not return to historical levels due to decline in popularity, with
concession revenues stemming from the county fair serving as the
sole source of revenues covering the bonds, thus calling into
question the continued financial viability of the facility.

Fitch recently affirmed the rating to the aforementioned bonds in
early February.

Fitch has revised the Labor Relations ESG score to a '2' from a '3'
and Water and Wastewater Management ESG score to a '2' from a '1'
due to alignment with sector guidance.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Risk (League): N/A (There is no premier horse racing
league)

Declining Fan Base - Revenue Risk (Franchise): Weaker

The declining nature of the California horse racing industry, as
well as exposure to adverse events at other horse tracks has led to
reduced attendance and uncertainty in fan support, which has put
pressure on race track revenues. Race tracks also face increasing
competition for gamblers, from both internet gaming and regional
casinos, which has driven a declining trend in the satellite
wagering component of the authority's revenues.

These weaknesses are somewhat offset by a solid service area
combined with semi-diverse revenues from wagering, non-race events
and concessions, as well as management's ability to control
operating expenses and find additional revenue sources to somewhat
mitigate near-term declines. However, given continued deterioration
of the industry, sustainability of race track revenues become less
viable over the longer term.

State Support Ensures Maintenance - Infrastructure Development &
Renewal: Stronger

Del Mar has transferred the financial responsibility of capital
improvement and maintenance to the District Agricultural
Association (DAA). Some ongoing projects at the race track include
the renovation of an existing satellite wagering building into a
multi-purpose entertainment venue as well as a water treatment
plant.

Favorable Provisions & Reserves - Debt Structure: Stronger

Debt is 100% fixed-rate and fully amortizes by 2038 with a flat
debt service profile of $3.2 million per annum. A debt prepayment
feature provides accelerated prepayment of principal in the amount
of 30% of pledged net revenues (subject to a $4 million cap on net
Concession Revenues) that exceed 2.0x debt service. A second
prepayment feature offers further protection if coverage test
revenues (i.e. pledged revenues including all available uncapped
net Concession Revenue) should fall below 2.0x debt service.

No debt may be issued senior to the 2015 bonds, and rating agency
verification will be required for any additional parity bonds. A
debt service reserve fund is fully cash funded at maximum annual
debt service.

Financial Profile

Fiscal 2021 performance reached 1.44x debt service coverage ratio
(DSCR), up from 0.68x in 2020. The authority's profile is expected
to produce narrow near-term financial metrics under Fitch's rating
case projection, with an average indenture DSCR (inclusive of all
revenues with no caps on concession revenue) of 1.21x over the next
10 years, and falls below 1.0x by FY 2034.

Fitch's forecast shows horse racing operations becoming permanently
unprofitable beginning in 2023 with increasing losses every year,
thus calling into question the facility's ability to remain open
and generate race-day concession revenues over the intermediate
term.

PEER GROUP

There are no directly comparable peers, as this is the only race
track that Fitch rates.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Continued decline of net race track revenues combined with an
    inability to adapt operations to retain fiscal balance over
    Fitch's forecast horizon would lead to a downgrade;

-- Legislative action that could have a material impact on horse
    racing interest or operations in the state of California.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Stabilization of the California horse racing industry leading
    to financially sustainable horse racing operations over the
    forecast horizon would lead to a Stable Outlook;

-- Managerial or legislative action that lead to viable cost
    reductions and/or consistent revenue growth resulting in a
    stable financial profile would lead to a Stable Outlook.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

CREDIT UPDATE

Fitch conducted a full review of Del Mar Race Track Authority's
rated debt in early February.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Del Mar Race Track Authority (CA) has an ESG Relevance Score of '4'
for Financial Transparency due to the continued delay in
publication of audited financial statements, which has a negative
impact on the credit profile, and is relevant to the rating[s] in
conjunction with other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


DELCATH SYSTEMS: SilverArc, Devesh Gandhi Report 0% Equity Stake
----------------------------------------------------------------
SilverArc Capital Management, LLC and Devesh Gandhi disclosed in a
Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
that as of Dec. 31, 2021, they have ceased to beneficially own
shares of common stock of Delcath Systems, Inc.  A full-text copy
of the regulatory filing is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/872912/000181630722000004/schedule13gdchtsilverarc.htm

                       About Delcath Systems

Headquartered in New York, NY, Delcath Systems, Inc. --
http://www.delcath.com-- is an interventional oncology company
focused on the treatment of primary and metastatic liver cancers.
The Company's lead product candidate, Melphalan Hydrochloride for
Injection for use with the Delcath Hepatic Delivery System, or
Melphalan/HDS, is designed to administer high-dose chemotherapy to
the liver while controlling systemic exposure and associated side
effects.  In Europe, Melphalan/HDS is approved for sale under the
trade name Delcath CHEMOSAT Hepatic Delivery System for Melphalan.

Delcath Systems reported a net loss of $24.15 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $8.88 for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019. As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $34.43
million in total assets, $22.70 million in total liabilities, and
$11.73 million in total stockholders' equity.

New York, NY-based Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since 2018,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
31, 2021, citing that the Company has a significant working capital
deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise
additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DIXIE CENTERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21, until further notice, will not
appoint an official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter
11 case of Dixie Centers, LLC, according to court dockets.
    
                        About Dixie Centers

Dixie Centers, LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined
in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  It is based in Pompano Beach,
Fla.

Dixie Centers filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-19343) on
Sept. 28, 2021, listing $4,200,008 in assets and $1,857,120 in
liabilities.  Judge Peter D. Russin presides over the case.

Michael A. Frank, Esq. at the Law Offices of Frank & De La Guardia
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


EAGLEFORD RECYCLING: Unsecureds to Split $150K over 5 Years
-----------------------------------------------------------
Eagleford Recycling Services, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida a Subchapter V Plan of
Reorganization dated Feb. 10, 2022.

The Debtor is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed
in November 2017 for the purpose of owning and operating, after
re-permitting, an existing oil and gas-drilling and production
waste recycling facility on 15 acres of land in Cuero, DeWitt
County, Texas.

Since the bankruptcy filing, the Debtor has obtained preliminary
approval to borrow funds on a secured and administrative basis from
ERS Funding Group (the "DIP Loan") on a line of credit basis up to
$200,000. Borrowed or invested funds will be used to cover
going-forward operating expenses, including the cost of the
necessary bond to reopen the recycling facility.

The payments under this Plan will be funded from income from
operations once the facility is reopened and, if necessary, from
borrowed or newly invested funds. The projection of income assumes
that Petroswift will have an allowed secured claim in the amount of
$205,444. If Petroswift's claim is allowed in the amount filed
($428,504), annual debt service to Petroswift will increase to
$27,604 (an increase of $14,433 per year).

This Plan proposes to pay the Debtor's Creditors with borrowed or
newly invested funds and income from operations once the facility
is reopened.

Class 1 consists of the secured claim of the DeWitt County Tax
Collector with a filed claim in the amount of $38,981.60. The
Creditor shall retain its Lien and the Debtor shall pay the allowed
Class 1 Claim as follows: monthly payments of principal and
interest at 4% amortized over 5 years after the Effective Date
(resulting in an estimated monthly payment of $717.91). So long as
payments to this Creditor are current under this Plan, this
Creditor shall not take any action to collect this Debt, including
the issuance of any tax certificate or similar instrument or the
conducting of any tax sale. Payments shall commence on the first of
the month but no sooner than 30 days after the Effective Date.

Class 2 consists of the disputed secured claim of Petroswift in the
approximate amount of $205,444. The Creditor shall retain its Lien
and the Debtor shall pay the allowed Class 2 Claim as follows:
monthly payments of principal and interest at 5% amortized over 30
years after the Effective Date with a balloon payment at the end of
5 years (resulting in an estimated monthly payment of $1,102.88
assuming a principal debt of $205,444). So long as payments to this
Creditor are current under this Plan, this Creditor shall not take
any action to collect this Debt, including enforcement of any
mechanic's lien or collection from any third party.

Class 3 consists of the secured claim of ERS Funding, the DIP
lender. To date, the Court has approved DIP lending up to $200,000.
The Creditor shall retain its Lien and the Debtor shall pay the
Allowed Class 3 Claim as follows: Interest will accrue at 10% and
be paid quarterly once the facility has sufficient net cash flow,
after the payments of the Creditors in Classes 1 and 2 are made, to
cover quarterly interest payments with a balloon payment at the end
of 5 years. Once the Debtor has made all payments, the Creditor
shall immediately release any Lien.

Class 4 consists of all non-priority unsecured claims. Undisputed
scheduled claims total $260,718.54. Creditors will receive a pro
rata share of a total fund in the amount of $150,000 through annual
payments over the 5 five years after the Effective Date.
Accordingly, each year a Creditor with an Allowed Claim will
receive a pro rata share of $30,000. Payments shall commence on the
first of the month but no sooner than one year after the Effective
Date.

Class 5 consists of the claims and interests of equity security
holders. The Claims and interests of Equity Security Holders are
unimpaired.

This Plan proposes to pay creditors of the Debtor from borrowed or
newly invested funds and income from future operations.

A full-text copy of the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated
Feb. 10, 2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3sEc4Kv from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Michael C. Markham, Esq.
     Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP
     401 E. Jackson St., Suite 3100
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Telephone: (813) 225-2500
     Facsimile: (813) 223-7118
     Email: Mikem@jpfirm.com

                About Eagleford Recycling Services

Eagleford Recycling Services, LLC, filed its voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 21-05810) on Nov.
12, 2021, listing up to $10 million in assets and up to $1 million
in liabilities.  Stephen J. Ostermann, manager, signed the
petition.  Michael C. Markham, Esq., at Johnson, Pope, Bokor,
Ruppel & Burns, LLP serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


EDGEWATER HOLDINGS: Seeks Ch. 11 Bankruptcy to Stop Foreclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Bandell of South Florida Business Journal reports that the
owner of the Fortuna House apartments in Miami's Edgewater
neighborhood filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection to halt a
foreclosure lawsuit.

The building is currently unoccupied because the city declared it
an unsafe structure, so this raises further questions about its
future.

Edgewater Holdings, which sought bankruptcy protection in early
February, owns the 24-unit apartment complex at 432 N.E. 26th St.
It was built on the 4,900-square-foot lot in 1925.

In December, First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. filed a foreclosure
complaint against Edgewater Holdings Miami over the property,
alleging $2.8 million in principal, plus interest, was due and the
loan was in default for missed payments. The case was still
pending, and the Chapter 11 filing automation stayed it.

Edgewater Holdings Miami also had a pending lawsuit against Fortuna
Holdings, the building's previous owner, accusing it of overstating
the financial performance of the building in prior years and not
disclosing physical defects of the building before it was sold.
Fortuna Holdings denied the allegations.

According to Edgewater Holdings Miami's case summary, the building
was operated as an Airbnb-style hotel until the Covid-19 pandemic
hit in early 2020. Then it was rented on a month-to-month basis.
Some tenants stopped paying rent, but the owner wasn’t able to
evict them for months because of government moratoriums.

The city inspected Fortuna House and determined it was unsafe Dec.
3, 2021 due to its age and structural conditions, according to the
case summary. Building inspectors throughout Miami-Dade County
increased enforcement following the deadly condominium collapse in
Surfside in June.

"The debtor is prepared to build a new structure to replace the
current building," Edgewater Holdings Miami stated in the case
summary. "However, the amount remaining to be paid on the first
mortgage exceeds the value of the property …. The lender was
seeking the appointment of a receiver in the foreclosure
proceeding, and the debtor felt that a receiver would only
aggravate the issues, in that the building is unoccupied, no rents
are being collected, and neither hotel nor short-term rental
options are presently possible due to the city’s unsafe structure
demolition order."

The building generated $120,139 in revenue in 2021, according to
the case summary.

In addition to the first mortgage with First Citizens Bank, the
debtor owes $277,000 to Fortuna Holdings as seller financing. It
also owes $116,700 in U.S. Small Business Administration disaster
loans.

                    About Edgewater Holdings

Edgewater Holdings Miami LLC is the owner of the Fortuna House
apartments in Miami, Florida.

Edgewater Holdings sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 22-10882) on Feb. 2, 2022.  In the petition
signed by Daniel Marzano as manager, Edgewater Holdings listed
estimated total assets of $5,037,200 and estimated total
liabilities of $3,695,403. Carlos de Zayas, Esq., of LYDECKER LLP,
is the Debtor's counsel.


EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE: Fitch Withdraws Ratings
--------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has withdrawn the following Issuer Default Rating
(IDR):

-- Einstein Healthcare Network (PA) IDR; Previous Rating:
    'BB+'/Positive Outlook.

Additionally, Fitch has withdrawn its ratings for the following
bonds due to prerefunding activity:

-- Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority (PA)
    (Albert Einstein Healthcare Network Issue) health system
    revenue bonds series 2015A (prerefunded maturities only –
    613612AG5, 613612AH3, 613612AJ9, 613612AK6, 613612AL4,
    613612AM2, 613612AN0, 613612AP5, 613612AQ3, 613612AR1,
    613612AS9, 613612AT7, 613612AU4, 613612AV2, 613612AW0,
    613612AX8) previous rating: 'BB+'/Positive Outlook.

Following the withdrawal of Einstein Healthcare Network's ratings,
Fitch will no longer provide the associated ESG Relevance Scores
for the issuer.

The ratings were withdrawn because the bonds were prerefunded and
the IDR is no longer considered relevant to the agency's coverage.


ELBA LUCERO FAMILY: Taps Belvedere Legal as Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Elba Lucero Family Trust seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California to employ
Belvedere Legal, a Professional Corporation to serve as legal
counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will provide these services:

   a. advise and represent the Debtor in all matters and
proceedings within this Chapter 11 case, other than those
particular areas that may be assigned to special counsel;

   b. assist the Debtor in any manner relevant to a review of its
debts, obligations, maximization of its assets and where
appropriate, disposition thereof;

   c. assist the Debtor in the operation, reorganization and
liquidation of its business, if appropriate;

   d. assist the Debtor in the performance of all of its duties and
powers under the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules, and in the
performance of such other services as are in the interests of the
estate;

   e. represent the Debtor in dealing with its creditors and other
constituencies, analyzing the claims in this case and formulating
and seeking approval of a plan of reorganization.

Belvedere will be paid an hourly fee of $495 and a retainer of
$50,000.  The firm will also receive reimbursement for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Matthew Metzger, Esq., a partner at Belvedere, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Matthew D. Metzger, Esq.
     Belvedere Legal, PC
     1777 Borel Place, Suite 314
     San Mateo, CA 94402
     Tel: (415) 513-5980
     Fax: (415) 513-5985
     Email: mmetzger@belvederelegal.com

                About The Elba Lucero Family Trust

The Elba Lucero Family Trust dated December 12, 1986 and Amended
and Restated August 10, 2005 sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 22-30059) on Jan.
31, 2022, listing up to $50 million in assets and up to $10 million
in liabilities.  Henry Richard Lucero, successor co-trustee, signed
the petition.

Belvedere Legal, PC, led by Matthew D. Metzger, Esq., is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


FIRSTENERGY CORP: Agrees to Reforms, to Settle Shareholders Suits
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE: FE) announced Feb. 10, 2022, that, acting
through the Special Litigation Committee of its Board of Directors,
it has agreed to a settlement term sheet to resolve derivative
claims asserted on the company's behalf and for the company's
benefit in multiple shareholder derivative lawsuits filed in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, and the Ohio
Court of Common Pleas, Summit County.  The measures outlined in the
settlement complement the substantial enhancements and actions that
FirstEnergy and its Board of Directors have implemented to
strengthen FirstEnergy's governance and compliance program.

"The corporate governance provisions included in the settlement are
aligned with the actions we have taken to move forward as a
stronger organization," said Donald T. Misheff, FirstEnergy
non-executive chairman.  "FirstEnergy achieved significant
accomplishments in 2021, including two transformative transactions
raising $3.4 billion, increasing our planned capital investments,
continued operational excellence, and, importantly, prioritizing a
culture of compliance and integrity."

The settlement, which is subject to court approval, will fully
resolve the derivative actions and stipulates a series of corporate
governance enhancements, including:

  * Six members of the Board of Directors who have served on the
Board for a minimum of five years will not stand for re-election at
the company's 2022 annual shareholder meeting.

  * A special committee will be formed at the direction of the
Board of at least three recently appointed independent directors to
initiate a review process of the current executive team, to begin
within 30 days of the 2022 annual shareholder meeting.

  * The Board will oversee the company's lobbying and political
activities, including periodically reviewing and approving
political and lobbying action plans prepared by management.

  * The Board will form a committee of recently appointed
independent directors to oversee the implementation and third-party
audits of the Board-approved action plans.

  * The company will implement enhanced disclosure to shareholders
of political and lobbying activities.

  * The company will further align financial incentives of senior
executives with proactive compliance with legal and ethical
obligations.

The settlement also includes a payment to FirstEnergy of $180
million, to be paid by insurance after court approval, less any
court-ordered attorney's fees awarded to plaintiffs.

John W. Somerhalder II, FirstEnergy vice chair and executive
director, added, "We are grateful to the outgoing Board members for
their dedication and years of service.  They began the hard work of
instituting changes that form the foundation on which we are
continuing to bring the company forward.  With a refreshed and
rightsized Board, we will continue to build on these important
efforts to enable a brighter future for the organization."

                     About FirstEnergy Corp.

FirstEnergy Corp. operates as a public utility holding company.
Its ten electric distribution companies form one of the nation's
largest investor-owned electric systems, serving customers in Ohio,
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, West Virginia, Maryland and New York.
The company's transmission subsidiaries operate more than 24,000
miles of transmission lines that connect the Midwest and
Mid-Atlantic regions.  The company is based in Akron, Ohio.








FORTEM RESOURCES: Seeks Brief Extension to File Bankruptcy Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fortem Resources, Inc. is seeking a brief extension of the period
during which it alone can file a plan to exit Chapter 11
protection.

In its motion, Fortem Resources asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Nevada to extend the exclusivity period to file its
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization to Feb. 28, and the period to
solicit acceptances for the plan to April 28.

The company said it needs just a few additional weeks to prepare
its plan and disclosure statement following the court's approval to
redesignate its Subchapter V case as a regular Chapter 11 case on
Jan. 25.

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Feb. 22.

                      About Fortem Resources

Fortem Resources, Inc. (TSXV:FTM, OTCQB:FTMR) is a Las Vegas-based
company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of
oil and gas properties.

Fortem Resources filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. (Bankr. D. Nev.
Case No. 21-14823) on Oct. 6, 2021.  On Jan. 25, 2022, the court
granted the Debtor's motion to redesignate its case as a regular
Chapter 11 case.

In the petition signed by Marc A. Bruner, chief executive officer,
the Debtor listed as much as $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  

Judge Natalie M. Cox oversees the case.  

Brett A. Axelrod, Esq., at Fox Rothschild, LLP and Clark Wilson,
LLP serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel and special counsel,
respectively.


GAMESTOP CORP: Vanguard Group Holds 7.77% of Class A Shares
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Vanguard Group disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Dec. 31, 2021, it
beneficially owns 5,931,837 shares of Class A common stock of
GameStop Corp., representing 7.77 percent of the shares
outstanding.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001326380/000110465922017613/tv0960-gamestopcorpclassa.htm

                          About GameStop

Grapevine, Texas-based GameStop Corp. is a specialty retailer
offering games and entertainment products through its E-Commerce
properties and thousands of stores.

GameStop reported a net loss of $215.3 million for fiscal year
2020, a net loss of $470.9 million for fiscal year 2019, and a net
loss of $673 million for fiscal year 2018.  As of Oct. 30, 2021,
the Company had $3.76 billion in total assets, $2.01 billion in
total liabilities, and $1.75 billion in total stockholders' equity.


GIRARDI & KEESE: Crash Attorneys Deny Acting in Bad Faith
---------------------------------------------------------
Holly Barker of Bloomberg Law reports that former Girardi Keese
attorneys David Lira and Keith Griffin say the Northern District of
Illinois lacks authority to order them to compensate their former
clients for settlement funds allegedly stolen by Thomas Girardi.

Lira and Griffin worked for the firm when it represented surviving
family members of people killed in 2018 when Lion Air flight 610
crashed into the Java Sea.  Girardi declared bankruptcy not long
after admitting to the court that he didn't have the money he still
owed the clients.

Lira and Griffin left the Girardi firm before Girardi admitted in
court that he couldn't pay his clients.  Both deny acting in bad
faith and claim that there isn't evidence to show that their
conduct was the but-for cause of the harm to their former clients.

There isn't any evidence showing that "informing this Court at any
specific moment in time would have led to a different
result—namely that Mr. Girardi and the law firm filed for
bankruptcy protection," Griffin told Judge Thomas M. Durkin of the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Thursday,
February 10, 2022.

Lira says ordering him to compensate his clients for Girardi's
actions would be "excessive in relation to" his conduct.

Lira and Griffin also argue that before the court can order them to
pay damages, they are entitled to a jury trial.

Former local co-counsel for the Lion Air clients, Edelson PC, also
submitted briefing on the court' inherent authority to issue
sanctions, but it was focused on the law governing the court's
authority and didn't argue how it applies to the facts here.

Edelson did say, however, that it would argue that the evidence
shows that Lira and Griffin should be held in contempt, alleging
they "violated—and aided and abetted Tom Girardi in
violating—the Court's order that Girardi Keese must pay
settlement funds to the clients as soon as practicable."

Alternatively, Edelson says the court could rely on its separate
inherent authority to make their former clients whole.

If "certain factual predicates are met, the Court does have the
inherent power to issue sanctions" and to require attorneys to
compensate plaintiffs, Edelson says.

According to Edelson, case law suggests that sanctions must be
supported by "clear and convincing evidence," a more demanding
standard than the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard applied in
civil matters, and that an additional hearing might be necessary
before the court can exercise its inherent sanction power.

Durkin said he wanted the briefs to address the scope of the
court's inherent sanction authority, as well as whether the court
has the power to order the lawyers to compensate the plaintiffs for
their lost settlement money, not because they "directly violated a
court order” but because by failing to inform the court that
Girardi was not paying the plaintiffs, they "caused the plaintiffs
to lose that money."

Edelson PC, which sounded the alarm on Girardi's mishandling of
client funds in December 2020, says that it is engaged in mediation
with its former clients. The underlying lawsuits against Boeing
were funded in 2020 for an undisclosed amount.

The firm said it is "committed to making these families whole
regardless of whether Edelson has liability, and we are pursuing
those possibilities on a number of fronts." The firm is
representing itself.

Lira is represented by Robie & Matthai PC and Swanson, Martin &
Bell LLP. Griffin is represented by Rosen Saba LLP and Cassiday
Schade LLP.

The case is In re Lion Air Flight 610 Crash, N.D. Ill., No.
1:18-cv-07686, 2/10/22.

                      About Girardi & Keese

Girardi and Keese or Girardi & Keese was a Los Angeles-based law
firm founded in 1965 by lawyers Thomas Girardi and Robert Keese. It
served clients in California in a variety of legal areas. It was
known for representing plaintiffs against major corporations.

An involuntary Chapter 7 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
20-21022) was filed in December 2020 against GIRARDI KEESE by
alleged creditors Jill O'Callahan, Robert M. Keese, John Abassian,
Erika Saldana, Virginia Antonio, and Kimberly Archie.

The petitioners' attorneys:

         Andrew Goodman
         Goodman Law Offices, Apc
         Tel: 818-802-5044
         E-mail: agoodman@andyglaw.com

Elissa D. Miller, a member of the firm SulmeyerKupetz, has been
appointed as Chapter 7 trustee.

The Chapter 7 trustee can be reached at:

         Elissa D. Miller
         333 South Grand Ave., Suite 3400
         Los Angeles, California 90071-1406
         Telephone: (213) 626-2311
         Facsimile: (213) 629-4520
         E-mail: emiller@sulmeyerlaw.com


HANESBRANDS INC: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB' issuer credit rating on
U.S.-based Hanesbrands Inc. and 'BB' issue-level rating on its
senior unsecured debt.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation for the company to
manage leverage near 3.5x and generate $375 million of free
operating cash flow (FOCF) in 2022 that will be used for dividends
and share repurchases.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our view that credit metrics
have return to normal from the onset of the pandemic. We believe
Hanesbrands has recovered from volatility caused by the pandemic
and the company's discontinuation of manufacturing PPE. We believe
credit metrics have returned to normal and been restored to
pre-pandemic levels, including leverage falling below 4x. Revenue
grew 2% year-over-year, demonstrating the company's ability to grow
its core apparel offerings despite discontinuing its PPE
manufacturing which had been buoying sales volumes capacity
utilization during the pandemic. It added $820 million of PPE sales
primarily in the second quarter of 2020, when most apparel
companies suffered drastic declines. Moreover, we believe last
year's sales growth was lower than the majority of our rated
apparel manufacturers primarily because Hanesbrands' revenue did
not decline as steeply during the pandemic given its PPE
production, and not because of underperformance. The company's
activewear segment, which includes its key Champion brand, grew
strongly in the low-double-digit percent area, comparable to rated
peers in the same categories. Hanesbrands turned to producing PPE
to fill demand created by the pandemic and keep its manufacturing
facilities running. We project the company will grow at a
mid-single-digit rate, largely due to Champion expanding into new
product categories and into international markets. This is in line
with the company's new 2024 $8 billion revenue targets, which
include raising its Champion sales to $3.2 billion from $3.0
billion.

"Cash flow generation also has exceeded expectations. Hanesbrands
also generated near $550 million of FOCF in fiscal 2021, above our
$375 million estimates from when we affirmed our ratings in spring
2021. This level of cash flow is consistent with pre-pandemic
levels and even includes higher levels of inventory in transit due
to supply chain challenges. We expect this to continue to be
headwind for the company in 2022, but that it should lessen
throughout the year. We also believe the company has pricing power
to offset input cost inflationary pressures, higher supply chain
costs, particularly in its faster growing higher margin Campion
business. While we believe there could be some trade-down to
private label and recognize the company has less ability to take
pricing in the innerwear segment, the favorable outlook for
Champion nonetheless supports healthy cash flows, including our
2022 forecast for FOCF of $375 million.

"Hanesbrands' share repurchase authorization does not change our
expectation for a balanced capital allocation over the next 12
months with a preference to dispositions over acquisitions.
Hanesbrands announced the authorization of a $600 million
three-year share buyback program. Therefore, we expect any excess
cash flow will be applied to share repurchases over the next three
years, but with discretion. We expect the company will buy back
less in years in which there is macroeconomic uncertainty or any
operating headwinds, as may occur in fiscal 2022. As such, we do
not expect the company to increase leverage to buy back shares, but
to maintain a balanced capital allocation policy going forward."

Hanesbrands has a relatively new management team, having announced
the appointment of new CFO Michael Dastugue in May 2021. Management
reiterated its financial goals to managing net leverage of 2x-3x.
S&P said, "Given its current plan to spend on investments in the
company, we do not expect mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the
near term. We expect share repurchases absent M&A opportunities.
According to management's calculations, the company is currently
leveraged at 2.7x and does not need to repay any further debt. We
do not expect Hanesbrands to raise debt to pursue M&A over the next
12-18 months and would view that as shift in financial policy."

The company announced that it has sold its European Innerwear
business for a de minimis amount, and it plans to sell its hosiery
business in fiscal 2022. S&P said, "We do not expect either
transaction to have an impact on credit measures. We view these
actions to be credit positive because Hanesbrands is focusing on
repositioning its portfolio toward brands with greater growth
prospects. We note that the hosiery business has been in decline as
consumers have shifted away from this product and to alternative or
updated options not offered by Hanesbrands."

The trend toward casual clothing will continue to support
Champion's growth. The activewear segment led by Champion and Hanes
has been the growth driver as innerwear, which accounts for about
one-third of total sales, has declined the past few years due to
the challenging U.S. retail environment, weak consumer traffic at
retail locations, lean inventory management by wholesale partners,
and retail store closures. S&P expects the casualization and health
and fitness trends to continue to support growth for activewear
even as consumers become more mobile outside of their homes as the
pandemic lingers. Hanesbrands plans to invest in Champion and
diversify its products into footwear, socks, and innerwear. It is
allocating a significant portion of its investment budget to
continue Champion's growth trajectory toward a $3.2 billion brand
by 2024.

Hanesbrands' plan for $300 million in growth capital investments
and to double its marketing spending to increase revenue and market
share would improve its overall product mix and manufacturing
execution, but that could weaken credit measures if unsuccessful.
Its scale and vertically integrated manufacturing have been
competitive advantages because the company distributes to wholesale
customers. Hanesbrands needs to adapt to changing consumer
preferences for more on-trend apparel in younger generations who
purchase online. To address this, Hanesbrands recently laid out a
plan to segment its manufacturing so it can be more flexible to
produce consumer-led innovations and supply the direct-to-consumer
(DTC) channel to reach the younger demographic. Although not a
complete manufacturing overhaul, it does involve significant
capital for automation and increase capacity to reduce lead time
and lower operating costs. It will also expand its U.S. West Coast
fulfillment center to reach customers more efficiently. Speed to
market is a competitive differentiator for the DTC channel and
younger consumers.

In addition, Hanesbrands will raise its marketing spending to 4% of
sales from 2% by 2024 to reinvest in its brands and make them more
relevant to younger consumers. Its innerwear brands, such as Hanes
and Maidenform, skew toward an older demographic. Hanesbrands
believes there is a $1 billion revenue opportunity to capture in
the under-39 generations. Moreover, we believe the company has
recently revamped its Champion brand successfully. It forecasts
that Champion will be a $3.2 billion global brand by 2024,
expanding at a low-double-digit percentage rate. Hanesbrands
promoted Chief Digital Officer Cindy Miller, who will help build
new data capabilities to work toward adding $1.8 billion of
incremental revenue by 2024. S&P said, "Although we expect the
company to self-fund these projects as it generates over $500
million of cash flow from operations, that still needs to be
converted to higher sales to increase EBITDA and margins in line
with our base case expectations for a sustained high-teen
percentage EBITDA margin. Moreover, Hanesbrands will require
increased working capital, which could pressure free cash flow if
sell-through is materially below expectations. Still, if these
investments do not yield their targeted returns, we believe the
company remains committed to its financial policy targets and would
manage expenses appropriately to keep leverage within those
targets."

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectations for leverage to be
near 3.5x and for the company to generate at least $375 million of
FOCF to apply to dividends and share repurchases over the next 12
months.

S&P could lower ratings if Hanesbrands sustained leverage above 4x.
This could occur if:

-- Innerwear sales declined further due to consumers trading down
or the company could not continue to expand the Champion brand
globally, possibly because of lower demand as inflation reduced
consumers' purchasing power or increased competition that prevented
a rebound in revenue growth and reduced fixed-cost absorption; or

-- The company adopted more aggressive financial policies,
including pursuing a debt-financed acquisition, share buybacks, or
dividends before restoring credit measures to its target.

S&P could raise the ratings if it expected leverage would be
sustained below 3x. This could occur if the company:

-- Strengthened its competitive position in the global apparel
industry by revamping its innerwear business and continuing to
increase Champion sales in the double-digit percentages; or

-- Made progress toward restoring its adjusted EBITDA margin in
the high-teen percentages from the mid-single digits in 2020
(including restructuring costs).

Environmental, Social, And Governance

ESG credit indicators: E-2 S-2 G-2

ESG factors have had no material influence on S&P's credit rating
analysis of Hanesbrands.



HERTZ CORP: Accused Thousands of Car Renters of Theft
-----------------------------------------------------
Steven Church of Bloomberg News reports that Hertz Corp., facing
lawsuits from hundreds of car renters who say they were falsely
arrested for auto theft, filed thousands of related criminal
complaints each year against customers, according to claims in
newly released court documents.

In one four-year period, the company filed nearly 8,000 theft
reports annually, advocates for the falsely arrested customers said
in a federal court filing in Wilmington, Delaware Thursday,
February 10, 2022.  The advocates cited internal data from Hertz
that a judge ordered the company to release.

                          About Hertz Corp.

Hertz Corp. and its subsidiaries -- http://www.hertz.com/--
operate a worldwide vehicle rental business under the Hertz,
Dollar, and Thrifty brands, with car rental locations in North
America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia, Australia, the
Caribbean, the Middle East, and New Zealand.  They also operate a
vehicle leasing and fleet management solutions business.

On May 22, 2020, The Hertz Corporation and certain of its U.S. and
Canadian subsidiaries and affiliates filed voluntary petitions for
reorganization under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-11218).

Judge Mary F. Walrath oversees the cases.  

The Debtors have tapped White & Case LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as local counsel, Moelis
& Co. as investment banker, and FTI Consulting as financial
advisor. The Debtors also retained the services of Boston
Consulting Group to assist the Debtors in the development of their
business plan.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Regions 3 and 9 appointed a Committee to
represent unsecured creditors in Debtors' Chapter 11 cases. The
Committee has tapped Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its
bankruptcy counsel, Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP as
Delaware counsel, UBS Securities LLC as investment banker, and
Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisor. Ernst & Young
LLP provides audit and tax services to the Committee.

                          *     *     *

Hertz Global and its subsidiaries emerged from Chapter 11
bankruptcy at the end of June 2021.  Hertz won approval of a Plan
of Reorganization that unimpaired all classes of creditors (who are
legally deemed to have accepted it) and was approved by more than
97% of voting shareholders.  The Plan provided for the existing
shareholders to receive more than $1 billion of value.

Recovery by shareholders of close to $8 a share was made possible
after a fierce competition among bidders for control in the
company. Initial offers from potential bidders for Hertz in its
bankruptcy offered nothing for equity. Hertz in May 2021 selected
investment firms Knighthead Capital Management LLC and Certares
Management LLC, joined by joined by other investors including
Apollo Global Management Inc. and a group of existing shareholders,
as the winning bidders for control of the bankrupt company.  A
rival group that included Centerbridge Partners LP, Warburg Pincus
LLC and Dundon Capital Partners LLC was outbid at auction.

Hertz's Plan eliminated over $5 billion of debt, including all of
Hertz Europe's corporate debt, and will provide more than $2.2
billion of global liquidity to the reorganized Company.  Hertz also
emerged with (i) a new $2.8 billion exit credit facility consisting
of at least $1.3 billion of term loans and a revolving loan
facility, and (ii) an $7 billion of asset-backed vehicle financing
facility, each on favorable terms.


HIGHWAY TO HEAVEN: Taps Gotfredson & Associates as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Highway to Heaven Route 66 Motor Cycle Memorial, LLC seeks approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California to employ Gotfredson & Associates, APC to serve as legal
counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The hourly rates charged by the firm's attorneys and paralegals are
as follows:

     Partners       $400 to $500 per hour
     Associates     $300 per hour
     Paralegals     $100 per hour

The firm will be paid a retainer in the amount of $2,000 and will
be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

E. Jay Gotfredson, Esq., a partner at Gotfredson & Associates,
disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     E. Jay Gotfredson, Esq.
     Gotfredson & Associates, APC
     11755 Wilshire Boulevard, 15th Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90025-1501
     Tel: (310) 478-0808
     Fax: (310) 478-3838
     Email: LawFirm@GotfredsonAssociates.com

                 About Highway to Heaven Route 66

Highway to Heaven Route 66 Motor Cycle Memorial, LLC filed a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No.
22-10002) on Jan. 2, 2022, disclosing as much as $1 million in both
assets and liabilities.  Judge Mark D. Houle oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by E. Jay Gotfredson, Esq., at Gotfredson
& Associates, APC.


INNERLINE ENGINEERING: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Innerline Engineering, Inc.
        1663 Commerce Street
        Corona, CA 92880

Business Description: Innerline Engineering, Inc. provides
                      pipeline cleaning and inspection services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 14, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 22-10545

Judge: Hon. Wayne E. Johnson

Debtor's Counsel: Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
                  RESNIK HAYES MORADI, LLP
                  17609 Ventura Blvd., Suite 314
                  Encino, CA 91316
                  Tel: (213) 572-0800
                  Fax: (213) 572-0860

Total Assets: $1,885,915

Total Liabilities: $9,163,707

The petition was signed by J.C. Yeh as chief financial officer.

The Debtor stated it no creditors holding unsecured claims.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/HZKYT3Y/Innerline_Engineering_Inc__cacbke-22-10545__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES: Douglas Singer Reports 6.98% Equity Stake
----------------------------------------------------------------
Douglas M. Singer disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Jan. 31, 2022, he
beneficially owns 293,000 shares of common stock of Interpace
Biosciences, Inc., representing 6.98 percent of the shares
outstanding.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001054102/000119983522000087/singer_sc13g.htm

                           About Interpace

Headquartered in Parsippany, NJ, Interpace Biosciences f/k/a
Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. -- http://www.interpace.com--
offers specialized services along the therapeutic value chain from
early diagnosis and prognostic planning to targeted therapeutic
applications.  Clinical services, through Interpace Diagnostics,
provides clinically useful molecular diagnostic tests,
bioinformatics and pathology services for evaluating risk of cancer
by leveraging the latest technology in personalized medicine for
improved patient diagnosis and management.  Pharma services,
through Interpace Pharma Solutions, provides pharmacogenomics
testing, genotyping, biorepository and other customized services
to
the pharmaceutical and biotech industries.  

Interpace Biosciences reported a net loss of $26.45 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $26.74 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the
Company had $40.31 million in total assets, $32.42 million in total
liabilities, $46.54 million in preferred stock, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $38.65 million.

Woodbridge, New Jersey-based BDO USA, LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2012, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 1, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered operating
losses, has negative operating cash flows and is dependent upon its
ability to generate profitable operations in the future or obtain
additional financing to meet its obligations and repay its
liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come
due.  In addition, the Company has been materially impacted by the
outbreak of a novel coronavirus (COVID-19), which was declared a
global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


INW MANUFACTURING: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CCC+', Outlook Negative
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating and its rating
on the first-lien term loan on U.S-based INW Manufacturing LLC to
'CCC+' from 'B-'; the recovery rating on the first-lien term loans
remains '3'.

The negative outlook reflects the potential for another downgrade
over the next 12 months if INW is unable to stabilize and grow its
presently weak profitability and negative free operating cash flow
(FOCF).

INW's profitability has deteriorated meaningfully because of a
fire-related plant shutdown, high inflation, and supply-chain
disruptions; we assume any profit recovery will be gradual. The
company's third-quarter 2021 sales declined materially, accompanied
by an even more significant drop in S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
EBITDA, because of a fire at the company's main liquids facility
and supply-chain problems, including steep input cost increases and
labor shortages. Profitability is unlikely to begin to recover
until the second quarter of 2022, when the liquids plant is
expected to come fully back online, price increases are
implemented, and supply-chain disruptions potentially ease. S&P
expects adjusted leverage will approach 9x over the next few
quarters and EBITDA cash interest coverage will remain around 1.5x
before improving somewhat in the latter half of 2022.

S&P said, "We believe the company is taking actions to strengthen
production capabilities, including negotiating with suppliers to
secure materials that are in short supply and increasing labor
wages. Nevertheless, these actions will likely increase costs and
constrain profit improvement in 2022--despite potentially helping
sales rebound.

"We have revised our assessment of INW's liquidity to less than
adequate. Expectations for weak cash generation over the next few
quarters and our view that INW has little flexibility to absorb
low-probability adversities have contributed to our unfavorable
liquidity assessment revision. Cash interest costs of over $30
million, capital expenditures of $20 million, and contractual term
loan B principal amortization of $22 million annually starting in
mid-2022 are significant compared to third-quarter run rate S&P
adjusted EBITDA.

"Nevertheless, we do not believe a liquidity crisis is imminent
because availability under the ABL increased to more than $50
million in the fourth quarter from $27.6 million as of Sept. 30,
2021. This improvement occurred following the receipt of $33
million in cash from the issuance of equity to financial sponsor
Cornell Capital LLC and $15 million cash received from fire-related
insurance proceeds; more insurance-related recoveries are
anticipated by the company later in 2022. INW's ability to
effectively manage working capital in a supply-chain-constrained
environment and navigate macro-headwinds will likely dictate its
ability to maintain a satisfactory cushion to the ABL's springing
fixed-charge covenant (FCC) ratio threshold, which is $8
million-$10 million, depending on the borrowing base. Inventory
levels are relatively high, but the need to effectively service
customers, acquire additional inputs that are presently
out-of-stock, fund seasonal demand spikes, and collect receivables
from smaller clients could require more investment. We also believe
INW has organic growth initiatives pertaining to a new leased
facility in Texas that could require a $10 million-$20 million cash
investment for working capital and start-up costs in 2023.

"The negative outlook reflects the potential for another downgrade
over the next 12 months if INW is unable to stabilize and grow its
presently weak profitability and negative FOCF because of continued
supply-chain and inflation headwinds. We could also lower the
ratings if intense competition persists, leading to price
discounting to win back or maintain customers."

S&P could lower the rating if it believes the potential for a
default over the subsequent 12 months has increased, possibly
because of:

-- Dwindling resources to meet interest, debt amortization, and
business investments, including working capital and potential
organic and acquisition growth initiatives;

-- Higher ABL utilization, which would increase the prospect of
needing to comply with the ABL springing fixed-charge covenant; or

-- A sustained imbalance in the capital structure, which could
lead to a distressed exchange or bankruptcy filing.

S&P could revise the outlook to positive or raise the rating if:

-- Supply-chain disruptions ease and INW successfully implements
price increases;

-- The U1 facility comes back online, enabling the company to
regain customers and eventually restore the plant's profits; and

-- EBITDA to cash interest coverage approaches 2x.



JASON HOLDINGS: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Issuer-Credit Rating
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all ratings on Jason Holdings Inc.,
including its 'CCC+' issuer-credit rating on the company, at the
issuer's request. The outlook was negative at the time of
withdrawal.



JC STRENGTH: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to July 5
---------------------------------------------------------
JC Strength & Conditioning, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia to extend the exclusivity
period to file a Chapter 11 plan to July 5.

The extension, if granted by the Court, will further the company's
efforts to preserve value and avoid unnecessary litigation if a
competing plan is proposed, according to a motion filed by the
company in court.

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Feb. 24.

                 About JC Strength & Conditioning

Established in 2008, JC Strength & Conditioning, Inc., is in the
health and fitness business.  The company is based in Alpharetta,
Ga.

JC Strength & Conditioning filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No.
20-21528) on Nov. 12, 2020, listing $1,354,709 in assets and
$1,353,796 in liabilities.  Justin Tway, president, signed the
petition.   

Judge James R. Sacca presides over the case.  

The Debtor is represented by William A. Rountree, Esq., at Rountree
Leitman & Klein, LLC.


LATAM AIRLINES: Asks Court Approval for Backstop Financing Deal
---------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Archer of Law360 reports that the Chilean carrier LATAM
Airlines asked a New York bankruptcy judge Thursday, February 10,
2022, to approve a backstop financing agreement for its Chapter 11
plan that creditor groups claim would pay unreasonably high fees to
the backstop creditors.

On the first day of a two-day hearing conducted virtually, U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge James Garrity heard LATAM Airlines Group SA argue
that it has reached a reasonable deal to backstop the $5.4 billion
new equity offering included in its Chapter 11 plan, while the
objecting creditors called the proposed $734 million in fees for
the backstopping parties "unprecedented."

                    About LATAM Airlines Group

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. -- http://www.latam.com/-- is a
pan-Latin American airline holding company involved in the
transportation of passengers and cargo and operates as one unified
business enterprise. It is the largest passenger airline in South
America.

Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, LATAM offered passenger
transport services to 145 different destinations in 26 countries,
including domestic flights in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador and Peru, and international services within Latin America
as well as to Europe, the United States, the Caribbean, Oceania,
Asia and Africa.

LATAM and its 28 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11254) on May 25, 2020. Affiliates in
Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the United States are part of
the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors disclosed $21,087,806,000 in total assets and
$17,958,629,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting as restructuring advisor, Lee
Brock Camargo Advogados as local Brazilian litigation counsel, and
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Claro & Cia in Chile as special
counsel. The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. and The Boston
Consulting Group UK LLP serve as the Debtors' strategic advisors.
Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Dechert LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP, as conflicts counsel, UBS
Securities LLC as investment banker, and Conway MacKenzie, LLC, as
financial advisor. Ferro Castro Neves Daltro & Gomide Advogados is
the committee's Brazilian counsel.

The Ad Hoc Group of LATAM Bondholders tapped White & Case LLP as
counsel.

Glenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes, LLP, led by managing partner Andrew
Glenn and partner Shai Schmidt, has been retained as counsel to the
Ad Hoc Committee of Shareholders.


LATAM AIRLINES: Asks Court Okay to Backstop Rights Offering
-----------------------------------------------------------
Rick Archer of Law360 reports that Chilean carrier LATAM Airlines
asked a New York bankruptcy judge Thursday, February 10, 2022, to
approve a backstop financing agreement for its Chapter 11 plan that
creditor groups claim would pay unreasonably high fees to the
backstop creditors.

On the first day of a two-day hearing conducted virtually, U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge James Garrity heard LATAM Airlines Group SA argue
that it has reached a reasonable deal to backstop the $5.4 billion
new equity offering included in its Chapter 11 plan, while the
objecting creditors called the proposed $734 million in fees for
the backstopping parties "unprecedented."

                     About LATAM Airlines Group

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. -- http://www.latam.com/-- is a
pan-Latin American airline holding company involved in the
transportation of passengers and cargo and operates as one unified
business enterprise. It is the largest passenger airline in South
America.

Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, LATAM offered passenger
transport services to 145 different destinations in 26 countries,
including domestic flights in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador and Peru, and international services within Latin America
as well as to Europe, the United States, the Caribbean, Oceania,
Asia and Africa.

LATAM and its 28 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11254) on May 25, 2020.  Affiliates in
Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the United States are part of
the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors disclosed $21,087,806,000 in total assets and
$17,958,629,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting as restructuring advisor, Lee
Brock Camargo Advogados as local Brazilian litigation counsel, and
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Claro & Cia in Chile as special
counsel.  The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. and The Boston
Consulting Group UK LLP serve as the Debtors' strategic advisors.
Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Dechert LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP, as conflicts counsel, UBS
Securities LLC as investment banker, and Conway MacKenzie, LLC, as
financial advisor. Ferro Castro Neves Daltro & Gomide Advogados is
the committee's Brazilian counsel.

The Ad Hoc Group of LATAM Bondholders tapped White & Case LLP as
counsel.

Glenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes, LLP, led by managing partner Andrew
Glenn and partner Shai Schmidt, has been retained as counsel to the
Ad Hoc Committee of Shareholders.


LATAM AIRLINES: Searches for Lenders to Refinance Bankruptcy Loan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Hill of Bloomberg News reports that Latam Airlines Group SA
is working to identify a lender or lenders to refinance a slug of
debt obtained during its bankruptcy, a lawyer for the Chilean
carrier said Thursday, February 10, 2022.

Latam intends to file court papers related to the refinancing by
Feb. 17, 2022 and the debt in question matures in April, Lisa
Schweitzer of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton said in a bankruptcy
hearing.

                   About LATAM Airlines Group

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. -- http://www.latam.com/-- is a
pan-Latin American airline holding company involved in the
transportation of passengers and cargo and operates as one unified
business enterprise. It is the largest passenger airline in South
America.

Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, LATAM offered passenger
transport services to 145 different destinations in 26 countries,
including domestic flights in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador and Peru, and international services within Latin America
as well as to Europe, the United States, the Caribbean, Oceania,
Asia and Africa.

LATAM and its 28 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11254) on May 25, 2020. Affiliates in
Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the United States are part of
the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors disclosed $21,087,806,000 in total assets and
$17,958,629,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting as restructuring advisor, Lee
Brock Camargo Advogados as local Brazilian litigation counsel, and
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Claro & Cia in Chile as special
counsel. The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. and The Boston
Consulting Group UK LLP serve as the Debtors' strategic advisors.
Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Dechert LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP, as conflicts counsel, UBS
Securities LLC as investment banker, and Conway MacKenzie, LLC, as
financial advisor. Ferro Castro Neves Daltro & Gomide Advogados is
the committee's Brazilian counsel.

The Ad Hoc Group of LATAM Bondholders tapped White & Case LLP as
counsel.

Glenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes, LLP, led by managing partner Andrew
Glenn and partner Shai Schmidt, has been retained as counsel to the
Ad Hoc Committee of Shareholders.


LAUREATE EDUCATION: Moody's Assigns B1 CFR, Rates 1st Lien Debt Ba3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. assigned ratings to Laureate
Education, Inc. (NEW) ("Laureate"), including a B1 corporate family
rating and a B1-PD probability of default rating, upon the
for-profit higher-education provider's announcement that it will be
making a debt-financed distribution to its shareholders. Moody's
also assigned Ba3 instrument ratings to both an existing $410
million, first-lien, senior secured revolving credit facility
expiring in late 2024 and a new, $500 million, first-lien, senior
secured term loan maturing in early 2029. Proceeds from the new
term loan will be used for a return of capital to shareholders,
either through dividends or share repurchases, and to satisfy an
estimated $14 million in transaction fees and expenses. Moody's has
also assigned a speculative grade liquidity rating of SGL-1,
reflecting the publicly traded company's very good liquidity.
Laureate's outlook is stable.

The proposed debt-funded distribution points to aggressive
financial strategy that the company, still significantly
private-equity owned despite its public company status, is willing
to employ. Governance considerations are therefore a driver of this
ratings action. Additionally, given an expected easing of social
restrictions and its favorable impact on students returning to
campus, Moody's views social considerations as a driver of this
action as well.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by the action:

New Assignments:

Issuer: Laureate Education, Inc. (NEW)

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B1

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B1-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-1

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned Ba3 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned Ba3
(LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Laureate Education, Inc. (NEW)

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Laureate's B1 CFR reflects the company's improved leverage and
operational focus as the result of using proceeds from asset
divestitures over the past several years to pay down debt. With
nearly $1.1 billion in annual revenue, the company now provides its
higher education programs and services to students though its
licensed universities and higher education institutions in Mexico
and Peru only. The $500 million of incremental term loan debt will
more than double the company's pro-forma Moody's-adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA leverage, to nearly 3.1 times as of year-end 2021,
which is moderate for the B1 ratings category. And the EBITDA
calculation itself employs extensive add-backs that are a function
of the sweeping restructuring of the company over the years; there
are addbacks for heavy losses on debt extinguishment, asset
impairment writedowns, financial derivative losses and foreign
exchange gains, and for an ongoing excellence in process (EiP)
program to adjust for, for example, severance expenses and lease
cancellation expenses that have been incurred over the years.
Moody's expects a meaningfully more stable, streamlined operating
platform over the next 12 to 18 months, and a dramatic decline in
EiP adjustments as well, such that the poor quality of earnings
that weighs on the ratings will improve. The rating also considers
moderate risk stemming from emerging markets and mismatched
currency.

Laureate now focuses on the developing markets of Mexico and Peru,
which contribute equal amounts to its sizable, $1.1 billion revenue
base. In these markets, a private, non-government-supported payment
model accounts for 97% of tuition payments. The company
historically demonstrated solid enrollment growth in its
institutions, which have come under pressure due to the coronavirus
outbreak. Student enrollments fell in 2020 by 8%, while revenue
fell 15%, with a reversal in 2021, when enrollment rebounded by
15%, and revenues 6%. As society emerges from the health pandemic,
Moody's believes Laureate will see enrollment growth again in 2022.
Higher enrollment, inflation-adjusted pricing, and expanding
capacity and utilization rates of Laureate's hybrid education model
should lead to mid-single-digit revenue growth this year.

Reputation risk is highly relevant to the education sector, and to
for-profit institutions in particular since an event that would
undermine the educator's reputation as an institution could harm
the company's operating metrics. Legal and regulatory challenges,
if not remedied, can present increased risk of operational
deterioration if specific institution licenses are withdrawn.
Nevertheless, the company must balance its duties to shareholders
and profits with its duties to students looking for a marketable
degree and future job placement. The B1 rating reflects Laureate's
exposure to these legal, regulatory, and practical challenges in
the context of the company's operations in a complex industry
across two distinct jurisdictions.

Moody's assesses Laureate's liquidity as very good, as reflected in
the SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating. The company has
carried unusually large cash balances in recent years, largely as a
result of asset sales. Cash at December 31, 2021 was $325 million.
A very large, $410 million revolving credit facility, a holdover
from when Laureate was a $4.0 billion-revenue company, continues to
be undrawn. Given its streamlining through asset sales, Laureate
has a diminished ability to resort to the sale of unencumbered
assets, such as real estate, as an alternative source of liquidity,
as it has in the recent past. Still, cash reserves, full revolver
access, and covenant flexibility support Moody's strong liquidity
assessment, while free cash flow is subdued given heavy
expenditures for leases for the company's extensive physical
infrastructure.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations for
mid-single-digit revenue growth over the next 12 to 18 months,
corresponding with an improvement in student enrollments, while
financial leverage moderates to below 2.5 times. Given high
Moody's-adjusted capital lease spending for an expanding
infrastructure, free cash flow will be modest for the B1 CFR, in
the mid-single-digit percentages. But given a strong starting
point, balance sheet cash will build and absent further dividends,
remain very healthy relative to the funded debt burden.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be upgraded if the company can sustain moderate
revenue growth and margin improvement while maintaining at least
good liquidity, the latter supported by free cash flows that, as a
percentage of debt, are sustained above 5%. Moody's would also
expect an improvement in earnings quality and a demonstrated
commitment to restrained financial strategy with regard to
acquisitions and additional returns of shareholder capital.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company experiences
weakening enrollments, if Laureate cannot successfully improve its
operating margins while continuing to manage foreign currency risk,
or if free cash flow deteriorates, resulting in weaker liquidity. A
downgrade could also be warranted if debt-to-EBITDA exceeds 4.0
times for a sustained period, or if the company engages in
aggressive debt-funded growth or in recurring large shareholder
distributions.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Services published in November 2021.

Laureate is based in Miami, Florida and operates a leading network
of five accredited universities in Mexico and Peru offering
academic programs to approximately 389,000 students at over 50
campuses and online delivery. Moody's expects Laureate to generate
2022 revenue of roughly $1.15 billion, a better than 5% increase
over anticipated 2021 revenue.


LAUREATE EDUCATION: S&P Assigns 'B+' ICR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B+' issuer credit rating to
Miami-based for-profit higher education company Laureate Education
Inc. and its 'B+' issue-level rating to its proposed senior secured
term loan B. The recovery rating is '3', indicating its expectation
of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) recovery in the
event of a payment default.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that the company will
continue to increase enrollment and revenue in the mid-single-digit
percent area in 2022 and 2023, while maintaining leverage below
3.5x and FOCF to debt of above 7.5%.

The 'B+' issuer credit rating reflects Laureate's limited
geographic diversity, small size, operations in relatively volatile
developing markets that make it susceptible to currency
fluctuations and cash flow generation, and geopolitical risk.
Partially offsetting these factors are the company's profitability,
which S&P believes is good compared to that of rated peers; its
operations in both traditional universities and lower-cost
education; and the good growth trajectory of higher education
participation rates in the markets where it operates.

S&P said, "We expect single-digit percentage revenue growth driven
by increased enrollments in 2022 and 2023, coupled with cost
savings from corporate overhead. This will drive margin expansion
to the 30% area in 2022 and 2023, from about 21% at the end of
2021, and S&P Global Ratings' lease-adjusted debt to EBITDA in the
mid- to low-3x area in 2022 and high-2x area in 2023. Under our
base-case forecast, we expect enrollments in the company's
universities will increase in the mid- to high-single-digit
percentage area in 2022 and 2023 and that it can raise tuition to
offset inflationary pressure. We also expect that Laureate's
reductions in its corporate footprint following a significant
number of divestitures in recent years will support EBITDA margin
expansion in 2022 to the mid-20% area. Margin could improve further
in 2023 to the mid- to high-20% area. We also believe the company's
expansion of its online education programs could help further
improve margin because these classes are less expensive to run and
can have higher enrollment capacity than traditional in-classroom
education. Under these assumptions and the expectation that the
company's proposed $500 million debt issuance will fund returns to
shareholders, we expect FOCF to debt could be in the
high-single-digit percent area in 2022 and 2023.

"While the company's focus on the expanding Peruvian and Mexican
higher education segments provides a good growth opportunity, we
believe these developing markets and their currencies are also
relatively volatile. We believe an expanding middle class and
positive enrollment trends for higher education in Mexico and Peru
could drive revenue growth. However, these countries have
relatively high socioeconomic and political volatility that could
impair operating performance in the event of political unrest or
economic downturns, in our view. Additionally, while approximately
half of the company's revenue is in Peru, we believe that its
Peruvian operations account for around 70% of its EBITDA. We
believe that this concentration of profits leaves the company
particularly vulnerable to the Peruvian political and economic
landscape and educational trends. We also believe that the company
could attempt to manage its exposure to currency risk via currency
hedging.

"We believe Laureate's traditional university and value university
segments could help stabilize its revenue in regional economic
downturns. Laureate has both highly ranked, well-regarded premium
universities that can charge higher tuition and value-driven
teaching universities that charge lower tuition. We believe
enrollment at the company's traditional universities is likely to
drop during economic downturns, but that students are more likely
to register for programs at lower prices in recessionary
environments. We believe this could moderate the impact of lower
enrollments and help stabilize revenue.

"We expect Laureate will likely use cash flow generation to fund
shareholder returns. While we expect Laureate to target its measure
of leverage in the 2.5x area in the long term, the company would
attempt to maximize returns to shareholders with special dividends
and share buybacks. We expect the company to return significant
excess cash to shareholders over the next several years and that in
times of stress, this decision-making could impair credit metrics.
Given its recent asset divestitures, we expect large leveraging
acquisitions and capital expenditure projects over the next several
years are unlikely. We believe Laureate will prioritize organic
growth over aggressive expansion and new market initiatives.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Laureate will
continue to expand enrollment and revenue in the mid-single-digit
percent area and maintain leverage below 3.5x and FOCF to debt
above 7.5% in 2022 and 2023."

S&P could lower its rating on Laureate if it increased leverage and
sustained it above 4x or FOCF to debt dropped below 5%. This could
happen if:

-- The company undertook material acquisitions or funded further
aggressive shareholder returns;

-- A prolonged economic downturn in Latin America reduced
enrollment and prolonged revenue declines; or

-- Mismatches between the currency of debt and currency of
earnings resulted in weakened operating performance and reduced
cash flow in U.S. dollars.

While unlikely over the next 12 months, S&P could raise its rating
on Laureate if it believed the company could sustain leverage below
3x and FOCF to debt above 10%, which could happen if:

-- The company materially expanded its business and expanded
EBITDA margins, such that it had a more favorable view of its
competitive position; or

-- It generated more sizable cash flow than expected and used it
to fund early repayment of its term loan.

ESG credit indicators: E-2, S-2, G-2

ESG factors have no material influence on S&P's credit rating
analysis of Laureate. Its governance score reflects minority
ownership following divestitures and our expectation that the
company will transition its board with professional independent
members over the next year.



LEGACY AT WILLOW: Fitch Cuts IDR to 'BB+', On Watch Negative
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded The Legacy at Willow Bend's (LWB)
Issuer Default Rating to 'BB+' from 'BBB-', and downgraded the
rating on approximately $46 million of series 2016 fixed rate
revenue bonds issued by the New Hope Cultural Education Facilities
Finance corporation on behalf of LWB to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'. Fitch
has also placed LWB's ratings on Rating Watch Negative.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a gross revenue pledge, mortgage pledge,
and debt service reserve fund.

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

The Rating Watch Negative reflects LWB's event of default resulting
from its second annual DSCR covenant violation. In response to the
event of default, LWB has requested a waiver from its bondholders
to ensure they do not exercise their right to accelerate LWB's
debt. This waiver is required to secure an unqualified opinion for
LWB's 2021 (YE Sept. 30) audit.

The bond trustee has scheduled a meeting for bondholders on Feb.
15, 2022 to discuss the waiver request. Resolution of the Rating
Watch Negative is dependent on the release of the audit with an
unqualified opinion because this requires the successful execution
of a waiver agreement from bondholders.

LWB's debt service coverage covenant ratio (DSCR) violations in
2020 and 2021 reflect a variety of operating pressures, some
transient and some persistent. The coronavirus pandemic, a local
storm, unexpected entrance fee refund liabilities and labor
pressures have affected LWB's operations to varying degrees over
the past two years. While some of these pressures have abated,
Fitch expects other pressures to persist. The downgrade to 'BB+'
reflects Fitch's expectation for increasing labor expense and capex
requirements over the next several years.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Defensibility: 'bbb'

Good Service Area Supports Solid Demand

LWB's ILU occupancy has consistently remained in the mid-90% range,
and dipped only modestly to the low 90% a few times over the past
two years. Not surprisingly, SNF occupancy has fluctuated, dropping
to the 50% range at various points throughout the pandemic, and
then increasing to 83% as of February of 2022. In 2018 and 2019,
SNF occupancy was in the 90% range. This follows a trend
experienced in most markets nationally.

However, lowered healthcare occupancy proved beneficial to LWB
during the Texas deep freeze in February of 2021. Management was
able to transfer all healthcare residents to an affiliated nearby
property, the Legacy at Midtown when rolling power outages affected
the community. The newly constructed Legacy at Midtown did not lose
power during the crisis.

LWB is uniquely positioned as the only Jewish-sponsored life plan
community in its primary market area. Many residents move to the
Dallas area to be closer to their adult children, contributing to
the community's ability to draw residents from beyond its primary
market area. Demographic indicators are sound, as Texas and the
Dallas area enjoy population growth above the national average.

Competition for senior living is strong in the Dallas area. LWB has
successfully competed with three local life plan communities and
several for-profit and rental facilities. A new community offering
180 ILUs and AL but no SNF is expected to open three miles away in
2025. Favorably, LWB is exploring opportunities to serve as a SNF
provider to residents of this emerging competitor.

LWB has a solid track record of annual increases in both its
monthly service and entrance fees in recent years. Over the past
several years, LWB has increased its fees between 2%-6% annually.
According to Zillow, LWB's weighted average entrance fee of
$513,000 is somewhat higher than average home values in Plano of
$474,000.

Operating Risk: 'bb'

Persistent Operating Pressures Weaken Cost Management

As a predominantly type A contract provider, LWB is limited in its
ability to manage healthcare costs. Under this contract, residents
pay a fixed rate regardless of the level of healthcare they
require. Fitch views this as the least favorable contract type in
terms of operating risk.

LWB's profitability ratios have weakened since 2019 with operating
ratios exceeding 100% in 2020 and 2021, compared to average ratios
in the low 90% range from 2016 through 2019. Similarly, net
operating margin (NOM) decreased below 4% in 2020 and 201 compared
to average levels near 14% previously.

NOM-A fell from levels consistently above 20% prior to 2020 to
below 11% in 2020 and 2021. These ratios include $2.6 million CARES
Act funding in 2020, and $1.9 million in recognized revenue from
forgiven PPP loan in 2021. Insurance coverage for damages from the
freeze remain uncertain, and are not fully captured in recent
operating results. Given LWB's limited ability to manage healthcare
costs and ongoing labor pressures, Fitch expects profitability
ratios to remain consistent with the weak assessment over the next
several years.

Management's ability to meet its 2022 DSCR covenant relies on
maintaining positive net entrance fee receipts in 2022. In 2021,
LWB paid $8.2 million in entrance fee refunds vs. $6.7 million in
entrance fee receipts, resulting in negative net entrance fees,
which contributed to the 2021 DSCR covenant violation. On average
over the past five years (excluding 2021), LWB has paid $3.4
million in entrance fee refunds annually.

LWB's refund policy (that the refund is triggered when the resident
leaves the community as opposed to when the resident leaves the
ILU) increases the potential for cash flow disruption due to refund
unpredictability. As of this publication, LWB has approximately $5
million in entrance fee refund liabilities associated with
residents in licensed care.

LWB's capex is also expected to escalate beyond what was expected
at Fitch's last review. Management has reported preliminary plans
to build four to six additional ILUs. Plans include funding the
project with unrestricted liquidity and assumes initial entrance
fees from the units will exceed construction costs. Given LWB's
strong waitlist and IL demand generally, Fitch expects the project
to fill.

Capex spending has been below 70% of depreciation historically. The
project as anticipated would increase spending to a midrange level,
above 100% of depreciation over the next two years and address
LWB's somewhat elevated average age of plant of over 12 years.

LWB's capital-related metrics are solidly midrange, with average
revenue-only MADS coverage of .9x over the past five years.
Debt-to-net available has averaged 9.3x over the past five audited
years. MADS represented a moderate 13% of revenues.

Financial Profile: 'bb'

Stable Liquidity

LWB's financial profile is consistent with the 'bb' assessment, in
the context of its midrange revenue defensibility and weak
operating risk assessments.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, LWB had approximately $46 million of debt,
including the series 2016. Unrestricted cash and investments
measured approximately $20 million.

Fitch's baseline scenario, which is a reasonable forward look of
financial performance over the next five years given current
economic expectations, shows LWB maintaining operating and
financial metrics that are largely consistent with the 'BB+'
rating. Capital spending is expected to increase in 2022 and 2023
due to the ILU expansion and remain somewhat higher than historical
levels assuming increased spending on refurbishing ILUs as they
turnover.

Fitch's forward look assumes an economic stress (to reflect both
operating and equity volatility). The equity stress is specific to
LWB's asset allocation. LWB's cash-to-adjusted debt and MADS
coverage maintain levels consistent with the rating throughout
Fitch's baseline forward-looking scenario and remain consistent
with the 'BB+' rating under a stress case scenario.

Cash has been represented in excess of 300 days cash on hand (DCOH)
over the past several years, and therefore is not an asymmetric
risk.

Asymmetric Additional Risk Considerations

No asymmetric risk considerations were relevant to the rating
determination.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Given the current weakness in operations, an upgrade is
    unlikely over the Outlook period.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Cash to debt that approaches 20% without the expectation of a
    recovery to a higher level;

-- ILU occupancy that falls below 88% without expectation for
    recovery;

-- Operating ratios consistently near 105%;

-- Acceleration of debt by the bondholders;

-- Failure to release the 2021 audit with an unqualified opinion
    before August of 2022;

-- Repeated cash transfers outside the obligated group to support
    affiliates.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

LWB is a Type A life plan community located in Plano, TX,
approximately 20 miles north of Dallas. LWB opened in April 2008
and has 114 ILUs (102 apartments and 12 villas), 40 ALUs, 18 memory
support suites, and 60 SNF beds. Lifecare residents are primarily
on the 90% refundable entrance fee plan. Management has set aside
up to six ILUs to be used as rentals for residents that do not have
the financial resources for the lifecare contract. LWB is subject
to an annual DSCR covenant minimum of 1.2 times and a liquidity
covenant minimum of 150 DCOH.

LWB's sole corporate parent is Legacy Senior Communities (LSC),
which manages LWB under a management agreement. Fitch's analysis is
based on LWB, which is the only obligated group member.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


LTL MANAGEMENT: Lite DePalma Represents DiSanto Canadian Claimant
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC submitted a
verified statement to disclose that it is representing Diane
DiSanto in the Chapter 11 cases of LTL Management LLC.

The Guardian Law Group, LLP, is a Canadian law firm and is directly
retained by the representative Plaintiff in the Canadian Class
Action styled Diane DiSanto v Johnson & Johnson, Alberta Court of
Queen's Bench. The address for the Guardian Law Group LLO is attn.
Clint Docken, QC 342 – 4 Avenue S.E., Calgary, Alberta T2G 1C9.

The original class action statement of claim was filed in Alberta,
Canada on August 22, 2019. The class action statement of claim was
amended on December 17, 2021.

On the basis of the above Guardian Law Group LLC retention and
representation, LDGA is party to an Interjurisdictional
International Litigation Collaboration and Co-Counsel Agreement
dated February 8, 2022, which provides that LDGA will provide
certain US bankruptcy legal counsel and representation for The
Guardian Law Group LLP with respect to its client Diane DiSanto in
the above captioned LTL Management LLC Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.

The Guardian Law Group LLP and its co-counsel represent Diane
DiSanto in her respective individual and putative capacities as
proposed representatives of a Canadian class of individuals
suffering from ovarian cancer as a result of talc products.

Under Alberta, Canada statute, the putative class is a nationwide
opt out class. Nevertheless, Dian DiSanto is the only named
Plaintiff. Upon information and belief, there are three other class
actions pending in Canada as to talc liability. These four class
actions under Canadian law are not necessarily mutually exclusive
of each other, and may, but not certainly, be subject to joinder
and allocation.

The matter Diane DiSanto v Johnson & Johnson, Alberta Court of
Queen's Bench has as of the date hereof not yet be certified as a
class in Canada.

Nothing contained herein shall constitute a waiver of any rights or
remedies of the above referenced creditor under title 11 of the
United States Code or applicable law, including, without
limitation, the right to (i) amend, modify, or supplement this
Notice, or (ii) raise any jurisdictional argument now or at a later
date, including, but not limited to, the right to assert lack of
subject matter jurisdiction.

Counsel to DiSanto Canadian Class Action Creditors can be reached
at:

          Lite DePalma Greenberg & Afanador, LLC
          Allen J. Underwood II, Esq.
          570 Broad Street, Suite 1201
          Newark, NJ 07102
          Tel: (973) 877-3814
               (973) 623-3000
          E-mail: aunderwood@litedepalma.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://bit.ly/3rOU6Gi

                    About LTL Management

LTL Management, LLC, is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson (J&J),
which was formed to manage and defend thousands of talc-related
claims and oversee the operations of Royalty A&M. Royalty A&M owns
a portfolio of royalty revenue streams, including royalty revenue
streams based on third-party sales of LACTAID, MYLANTA/MYLICON and
ROGAINE products.

LTL Management filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D.N.C. Case No. 21-30589) on Oct. 14, 2021.  The case was
transferred to New Jersey (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No. 21-30589) on
Nov. 16, 2021. The Hon. Michael B. Kaplan is the case judge.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have $1 billion
to $10 billion in both assets and liabilities.

The Debtor tapped Jones Day and Rayburn Cooper & Durham, P.A., as
bankruptcy counsel; King & Spalding, LLP and Shook, Hardy & Bacon
LLP as special counsel; McCarter & English, LLP as litigation
consultant; Bates White, LLC as financial consultant; and
AlixPartners, LLP as restructuring advisor.  Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC, is the claims agent.

An official committee of talc claimants was formed in the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case on Nov. 9, 2021. On Dec. 24, 2021, the U.S.
Trustee
for Regions 3 and 9 reconstituted the talc claimants' committee
and appointed two separate committees: (i) the official committee
of
talc claimants I, which represents ovarian cancer claimants, and
(ii) the official committee of talc claimants II, which represents
mesothelioma claimants.

The official committee of talc claimants I tapped Genova Burns
LLC,
Brown Rudnick LLP, Otterbourg PC and Parkins Lee & Rubio LLP as
its
legal counsel.  Meanwhile, the official committee of talc
claimants
II is represented by the law firms of Cooley LLP, Bailey Glasser
LLP, Waldrep Wall Babcock & Bailey PLLC, Massey & Gail LLP, and
Sherman Silverstein Kohl Rose & Podolsky P.A.


LTL MANGEMENT: Says Chapter 11 Ideal Response for Talc Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie A. Pappas of Law360 reports that bankrupt Johnson & Johnson
talc unit LTL Management LLC responded to motions to dismiss its
Chapter 11 case, saying bankruptcy is the most efficient way to
address the 38,000 talc claims it is facing and avoid the tort
system's propensity for lottery-like results for claimants.

The sur-reply filed late Wednesday in response to three different
groups of talc claimants comes ahead of a trial in the bankruptcy
case that begins Monday, and comes a day after personal injury
claimants told a U. S. Senate subcommittee that Johnson & Johnson
is using a so-called "Texas two-step" strategy to allegedly wall
off billions of claims.

                     About LTL Management

LTL Management, LLC, is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson (J&J),
which was formed to manage and defend thousands of talc-related
claims and oversee the operations of Royalty A&M.  Royalty A&M owns
a portfolio of royalty revenue streams, including royalty revenue
streams based on third-party sales of LACTAID, MYLANTA/MYLICON and
ROGAINE products.

LTL Management filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D.N.C. Case No. 21-30589) on Oct. 14, 2021. The case was
transferred to New Jersey (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No. 21-30589) on
Nov. 16, 2021. The Hon. Michael B. Kaplan is the case judge. At the
time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have $1 billion to
$10 billion in both assets and liabilities.

The Debtor tapped Jones Day and Rayburn Cooper & Durham, P.A., as
bankruptcy counsel; King & Spalding, LLP and Shook, Hardy & Bacon
LLP as special counsel; McCarter & English, LLP as litigation
consultant; Bates White, LLC as financial consultant; and
AlixPartners, LLP as restructuring advisor.  Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC, is the claims agent.

An official committee of talc claimants was formed in the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case on Nov. 9, 2021. On Dec. 24, 2021, the U.S. Trustee
for Regions 3 and 9 reconstituted the talc claimants' committee
and appointed two separate committees: (i) the official committee
of talc claimants I, which represents ovarian cancer claimants, and
(ii) the official committee of talc claimants II, which represents
mesothelioma claimants.

The official committee of talc claimants I tapped Genova Burns LLC,
Brown Rudnick LLP, Otterbourg PC and Parkins Lee & Rubio LLP as its
legal counsel. Meanwhile, the official committee of talc claimants
II is represented by the law firms of Cooley LLP, Bailey Glasser
LLP, Waldrep Wall Babcock & Bailey PLLC, Massey & Gail LLP, and
Sherman Silverstein Kohl Rose & Podolsky P.A.

                     About Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson is an American multinational corporation founded
in 1886 that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and
consumer packaged goods. It is the world's largest and most broadly
based healthcare company.

Johnson & Johnson is headquartered in New Brunswick, New Jersey,
the consumer division being located in Skillman, New Jersey. The
corporation includes some 250 subsidiary companies with operations
in 60 countries and products sold in over 175 countries.

The corporation had worldwide sales of $82.6 billion in 2020.



MAJOR MODEL: Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
-------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Hill of Bloomberg News reports that Major Model Management
Inc., a modeling agency that has worked with the likes of Vogue and
Harper's Bazaar, filed for bankruptcy in New York on Friday,
February 11, 2022.

The agency listed assets of as much as $1 million and liabilities
of at least that amount in its bankruptcy petition, court papers
show. The Chapter 11 filing gives Major Model the ability to
continue operating while it sorts out a plan to repay creditors.

The company was founded in the late 1980s in Milan by Guido Dolci,
according to its Web site.

                  About Major Model Management

Major Model Management Inc. -- http://www.majormodel.com/-- is a
modelling agency based in New York City.  Major Model Management
Inc. filed a petition under Chapter 11 Subchapter V of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 22-10169) on Feb. 11,
2022.  The case is handled by Honorable Judge Martin Glenn.
Melissa A. Pena is the Debtor's counsel.


MARRONE BIO: Ardsley Advisory, et al., Report 10.35% Equity Stake
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, these entities reported beneficial ownership of shares
of common stock of Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. as of Dec. 31,
2021:

                                           Shares      Percent
                                        Beneficially     of
  Reporting Person                          Owned       Class
  ----------------                      ------------   -------
  Ardsley Advisory Partners LP           18,335,767     10.35%
  Ardsley Advisory Partners GP LLC       18,335,767     10.35%
  Ardsley Partners I GP LLC              18,335,767     10.35%
  Philip J. Hempleman                    18,335,767     10.35%
  Ardsley Partners Renewable
  Energy Fund, L.P.                      18,309,267     10.34%

The percentage ownership of the Reporting Persons is based on the
177,152,701 outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Issuer, as
disclosed on the Issuer's 10-Q filed with the SEC on Nov. 10,
2021.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001441693/000101905622000158/marrone_13g.htm

                     About Marrone Bio Innovations

Based in Davis, California, Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. --
http://www.marronebio.com-- discovers, develops and sells
innovative biological products for crop protection, plant health
and waterway systems treatment. The Company's products are sold
through distributors and other commercial partners to growers
around the world for use in integrated pest management and crop
protection systems that improve efficacy and increase yields and
quality while protecting the environment. Its products are often
used in conjunction with or as an alternative to other agricultural
solutions to control pests and enhance plant nutrition and health.

Marrone Bio reported a net loss of $20.17 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, a net loss of $37.17 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019, and a net loss of $20.21 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $82.14
million in total assets, $51.51 million in total liabilities, and
$30.63 million in total stockholders' equity.


MEN'S WEARHOUSE: Moody's Affirms Caa1 CFR, Alters Outlook to Pos.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed The Men's Wearhouse, LLC's
ratings, including the Caa1 corporate family rating, Caa1-PD
probability of default rating, B3 rating on the senior secured
priority term loan due 2025, and Caa1 rating on the senior secured
takeback term loan due 2025. The outlook was changed to positive
from negative.

The outlook change to positive reflects the improvement in Men's
Wearhouse's performance, credit metrics and liquidity over the past
year as it began to sequentially recover from the significant
pandemic-related declines in revenue and earnings in 2020. The
company's revenue has benefitted from improved demand as
coronavirus related restrictions eased and consumers attended more
in-person events. Cost savings and efficiency initiatives coupled
with a significant reduction in inventory, have led to higher
margins and strong free cash flow was that was used to repay all
revolver borrowings and boost its cash position.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Men's Wearhouse, LLC (The)

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Caa1

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa1-PD

Priority Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B3 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Caa1 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Men's Wearhouse, LLC (The)

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Men's Wearhouse's Caa1 CFR reflects the risk associated with the
sustainability of its business recovery as the company works to
improve its business model and product offerings post its
bankruptcy emergence and as pent up demand also contributes to
performance. The rating also reflects governance considerations,
including its private ownership and its high cost of capital of its
exit financing capital structure. Nonetheless, the company has
reduced debt and improved credit metrics. Per Moody's estimates,
the company's lease adjusted debt/EBITDAR is less than 3 times at
the end of 2021 and EBIT coverage of interest over 1.5 times.
Moody's expects further modest improvement over the coming year, as
demand for its products would benefit from a broader return to
office employment as well increase attendance at celebratory
events. Nevertheless, there remains significant uncertainty around
potential normalization of demand and the pace of recovery as the
pandemic continues to have a lingering negative effect on the
global economy, such as supply chain disruptions or future
restrictions related to new virus strains.

The rating also reflects Men's Wearhouse's meaningful scale in the
men's clothing market, offering a similar product mix and brand
diversity, with each brand focusing on different customer
demographics. While the company operates in a relatively narrow
segment of the apparel industry, primarily selling and renting
men's tailored and polished casual clothing for business and
special occasions, Moody's views this category as generally having
less fashion risk than most segments of apparel retailing.
Nevertheless, the shift towards lower margin casual clothing and
increased penetration of online shopping have been a persistent
challenge that will require continued investment for the company to
compete effectively in this fragmented market that includes larger,
better capitalized apparel companies.

Liquidity is good, supported by over $100 million of balance sheet
cash as of December, positive free cash flow, and ample excess
revolver availability, all of which should be sufficient to cover
cash flow needs over the next twelve months.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that while there
remains uncertainty around the pace and sustainability of the
recovery, Men's Wearhouse will demonstrate consistent improvement
in revenue and operating performance, while pursuing a conservative
financial strategy.

The ratings could be upgraded if improved operating performance is
sustained such that debt/EBITDA remains below 6.0 times and
EBIT/Interest sustained above 1.0 time, while maintaining at least
an adequate overall liquidity profile.

The ratings could be downgraded if operating performance
deteriorates or liquidity weakens, such as negative free cash flow
or increased revolver reliance, or if its probability of default
increases for any reason.

The Men's Wearhouse, LLC is an omni-channel specialty retailer of
menswear, including suits, formalwear and a broad selection of
business casual offerings. The company operates over 1,000 stores
in the U.S. and Canada under the Men's Wearhouse, Jos. A. Bank,
Moore's Clothing and K&G brands. Annual revenue exceeds $2 billion,
per Moody's estimates. Parent company, Tailored Brands, Inc., and
certain subsidiaries emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on December
1, 2020.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail
published in November 2021.


MORAN FOODS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC+' on Weak Performance
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its ratings, including its issuer credit
rating on U.S.-based, hard-discount grocer Moran Foods LLC (doing
business as Save-A-Lot) to 'CCC+' from 'B-'.

The negative outlook reflects continued refinancing risk with a
critical dependency on external lender support and consistent
performance improvements to successfully support its capital
structure.

S&P said, "We believe the company has thin liquidity and is
vulnerable to unexpected, high-impact events. Moran has recently
completed a complex transformation toward wholesale business model
rather than retail grocery. That conversion was delayed by about a
year, given the pandemic and other operational and management
changes in 2021 that we expect will keep EBITDA roughly flat with
2020. We think profitability will improve in 2022 as it
consolidates its transition to a branded discount wholesale model.
Still, it is unclear if the improvement will be sustainable enough
to support a refinancing of the capital structure at par.

"Even with anticipated improvements, we expect leverage to remain
high (more than 10x on an S&P Global Ratings' lease-adjusted basis
in 2021) and for cash flow generation to be negative by our
calculations in 2022. Additional cash interest payments on the
company's first- and second-lien debt starting in the second
quarter of 2022 compared with prior PIK (payment-in-kind) interest
arrangements will add extra pressure to the company's already thin
cash flow. The company recently received a waiver on the minimum
consolidated EBITDA covenants on its term loans until the fiscal
quarter ending in June 2023, from June 2022. Without this waiver,
we believe Moran would have breached covenants this year.

"Overall, for the capital structure to be sustainable, we believe
Moran will need to meaningfully improve its operating performance
and prospects for profitability in the next 12 months. Moran's
efforts to refinance its capital structure waited until the end of
its store conversion when operating performance is expected to
stabilize. The company's $150 million ABL, $60 million FILO
(first-in-last-out) and first-lien debt stated maturities are April
2024 and the second-lien coming due October 2024. We expect it will
extend the super senior facility ($15 million capacity with zero
outstanding) to April 2024.

"The company's transition to a wholesale business model since its
distressed restructuring process in 2020 has been slower than we
anticipated. In 2021, Moran finished converting its corporate
stores to retail partners, becoming a more flexible and
capital-light company. Still, free cash flow has been weak,
maturities are looming in coming years, and longer-term operating
prospects under a new CEO are mixed, in our view. We expect revenue
will decrease more than 10% in 2022 on organic declines, store
closures, and conversions to the wholesale model, but an increase
in margins will lead to better EBITDA.

"The negative outlook on Moran reflects our view that operating
performance will not rebound in a way that will make the current
debt load more sustainable, given persistent volatility.

"We could lower our rating on Moran Foods if we envision a specific
default scenario over the next 12 months. This could happen if the
company's operating performance does not rebound significantly in
the first half of 2022.

"We could raise our rating on Moran if it completes a refinancing
transaction at par that addresses its capital structure. We believe
this would likely indicate a better standing in the capital market
and be predicated on demonstrated operational performance
improvement."

To: E-2 S-2 G-3 From: E-2 S-2 G-2

S&P said, "Governance factors are now a moderately negative
consideration in our credit rating analysis because recent
performance indicates that management has had limited control over
the execution of its turnaround strategy. Since the restructuring
in 2020, the company has continued to underperform our expectations
with a slower-than-anticipated turnaround. We will continue to
closely monitor how it benefits from its transition to a discount
wholesale model and how operations progress under a new CEO, who
brings relevant wholesale grocery background."



MOVIMIENTO PENTECOSTAL: Exclusivity Period Extended to May 2
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mildred Caban Flores of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Puerto Rico extended the exclusivity period for
Movimiento Pentecostal Apostolico Cristiano, Incorporado to file
its Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement to May 2.  

                   About Movimiento Pentecostal

Movimiento Pentecostal Apostolico Cristiano, Incorporado filed a
petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No.
21-02645) on Sept. 1, 2021, listing as much as $500,000 in both
assets and liabilities.   

Judge Mildred Caban Flores oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Almeida & Davila, P.S.C. and Tamarez CPA, LLC as
legal counsel and accountant, respectively.


NABORS INDUSTRIES: Posts $114 Million Net Loss in Fourth Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Nabors Industries Ltd. reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $113.68 million on $543.70 million of total
revenues and other income for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2021,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$111.89 million on $446.74 million of total revenues and other
income for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2020.

For the year ended Dec. 31, 2021, the Company reported a net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $572.93 million on $2.02
billion of total revenues and other income compared to a net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $820.25 million on $2.14
billion of total revenues and other income for the year ended Dec.
31, 2020.

As of Dec. 31, 2021, the Company had $5.53 billion in total assets,
$4.13 billion in total liabilities, $675.28 million in redeemable
noncontrolling interest in subsidiary, and $718.94 million in total
equity.

Anthony G. Petrello, Nabors Chairman, CEO and president, commented,
"With our fourth quarter financial results, we closed the year 2021
on a high note.  Quarterly EBITDA increased by 5% sequentially even
including the impact of the significant early termination revenue
booked in the third quarter.  On a normalized basis, all of our
segments had strong growth, with U.S. Drilling, Drilling Solutions
and Rig Technologies leading the way."

"Our Lower 48 activity and pricing surged ahead, with leading edge
dayrates improving by as much as $4,000 per day toward the end of
the fourth quarter.  In the quarter, the contribution from our
Drilling Solutions segment accounted for 15% of the Company's total
EBITDA.  This proportion sets a new record high since the formation
of NDS in 2016.  When combined with Rig Technologies, these two
technology businesses accounted for 18% of our total EBITDA.  This
contribution demonstrates the scale and market acceptance of our
industry-leading innovation.  Our International segment added rigs
toward the end of the fourth quarter and positioned itself for a
strong 2022 as we continue to deploy rigs in Saudi Arabia and Latin
America."

"The backdrop for our performance was the constructive commodity
price environment in the fourth quarter, with WTI remaining above
the $65 mark.  Since the fears surrounding the impact of the
Omicron variant began to subside in early December, oil prices have
increased steadily and have recently exceeded $90.  Oilfield
activity has strengthened, and in turn, rig dayrates have improved
while margins are beginning to widen.  Looking through the balance
of 2022, we are optimistic that operators will respond to the
favorable commodity environment with higher drilling activity."

William Restrepo, Nabors CFO, stated, "During this last quarter, as
has been the case for the last couple of years, Nabors continued to
lead the industry in operational performance in the U.S. and
internationally.  Our daily drilling margins have outperformed in
the Lower 48 and our industry leading consolidated EBITDA has
continued its steady increase since it bottomed last year.  We
remain the leader in technology and innovation as measured by our
Drilling Solutions margins and customer penetration."

"Our performance in the fourth quarter enabled us to continue
generating free cash flow and reducing our net debt.  The robust
market environment entering 2022 should allow us to make additional
progress on our long-term goals as we move through the year."

"The completion of the two recent financing transactions, totaling
over a billion dollars, materially reduces our near-term debt
maturities and extends our liquidity runway.  With the lower amount
of debt coming due through 2024, we intend to address those
maturities with free cash flow.  With the closing of the new credit
facility, we have increased our Senior Priority Guaranteed Note
capacity to more than $400 million.  Together with our Priority
Guaranteed Note capacity, we have nearly $1 billion available for
future debt refinancing."

Mr. Petrello added, "We are pleased with our operational and
financial accomplishments in the fourth quarter.  We made
significant improvements in our financial metrics in 2021.  These
improvements have increased our financial flexibility, and we see a
path to further delevering in the future."

"Also during 2021, we made significant progress on our
Sustainability goals.  We reduced our field-level Lower 48 GHG
emissions intensity by 10%, doubling our annual target.  For 2022,
we are targeting further reductions, as we experience increasing
interest from our stakeholders to work with our customers toward
net zero emissions.  Our safety performance, measured by TRIR, set
another all-time record.  And we deployed the industry's first
fully-automated land rig, R801, which removes rig staff from harm's
way during drilling operations.  The systems and equipment
installed on this rig, which can be employed on other Nabors rigs
as well as those of third-party contractors, creates a path for
existing rigs to benefit from a significant technology upgrade
without requiring a newbuild.  A further benefit is an expansion in
the available talent pool able to work on our rigs."

"Last year we made additional advances in our efforts supporting
the energy transition.  We completed investments in three
geothermal companies, all with potentially disruptive technology.
We made headway on our own initiatives in fuel management, energy
storage, hydrogen, and carbon capture.  And we launched Nabors
Energy Transition Corp. (NYSE: NETC), a special purpose acquisition
company focused on opportunities in the energy transition, which
completed its initial public offering in November."

Mr. Petrello concluded, "As we look into 2022, we are optimistic
that industry fundamentals will improve consistent with a
constructive commodity price outlook.  Nabors is well positioned to
take advantage of an expanding market, with our highly skilled
workforce and our unmatched rig fleet.  We have the broadest, most
impactful portfolio of digital automation technology in the
drilling sector.  There are tremendous opportunities to apply our
core strengths to extend our leadership position in drilling
technology, while enabling the responsible production of
hydrocarbons.  With our own improving financial position and our
technology and innovation capabilities, we are ideally placed to
generate value across our stakeholder base."

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1163739/000110465922013919/tm225877d1_ex99-1.htm

                           About Nabors

Nabors (NYSE: NBR) owns and operates land-based drilling rig fleets
and provides offshore platform rigs in the United States and
several international markets.  Nabors also provides directional
drilling services, tubular services, performance software, and
innovative technologies for its own rig fleet and those of third
parties.

Nabors reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$820.25 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net
loss attributable to common shareholders of $720.13 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had
$5.17 billion in total assets, $3.94 billion in total liabilities,
$400.85 million in redeemable noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary, and 833.82 million in total equity.

                             *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 22, 2021, S&P Global Ratings placed
its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on Bermuda-based drilling
contractor Nabors Industries Ltd. and all of its issue-level
ratings on the company on CreditWatch with positive implications to
reflect the expected reduction in the outstanding borrowings on its
credit facility, as well as its forecast for a continued
improvement in its credit measures.

Also in November 2021, Fitch Ratings affirmed Nabors Industries,
Ltd.'s and Nabors Industries, Inc.'s (collectively, Nabors) Issuer
Default Ratings (IDRs) at 'CCC+'.


OSCEOLA FENCE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Osceola Fence Supply, LLC
        6490 Way Point Blvd.
        Saint Cloud, FL 34773

Business Description: Osceola Fence Supply, LLC provides fence
                      installation, repairs, or a custom solution
                      services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 14, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 22-00512

Debtor's Counsel: Lawrence M. Kosto, Esq.
                  KOSTO & ROTELLA
                  619 E Washington St
                  Orlando, FL 32801
                  Tel: 407-425-3456
                  Fax: 407-423-9002
                  Email: lkosto@kostoandrotella.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Anthony Paradiso as managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/NNO4J7A/Osceola_Fence_Supply_LLC__flmbke-22-00512__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


PFO GLOBAL: Contract Fight of VSP Stays in Bankruptcy Court
-----------------------------------------------------------
James Nani, writing for Bloomberg Law, reports that VSP Lab's
contract fight with non-debtors stays in bankruptcy court.

VSP Labs Inc. must litigate its contract-breach claims, originating
from a dispute with bankrupt eyewear maker PFO Global Inc., in a
bankruptcy court even though PFO's counterclaims have been sold to
another company, the Fifth Circuit held.

Hillair Capital Investments L.P. and Hillair Capital Management LLC
bought PFO's counterclaims.  But the bankruptcy court has
jurisdiction over VSP's continuing dispute with Hillair over the
original contract claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit held Wednesday.

VSP Labs sued PFO Global -- formerly Pro Fit Optix Inc. -- in
California state court in 2013 for breach of contract, and PFO
filed counterclaims.

                       About PFO Global

PFO Global, Inc., and its affiliates are a consolidated group of
companies that operate in the eyewear and lenses industry
worldwide.  Global owns 100% of the equity interests in Pro Fit
Optix Holding Company, LLC. In turn, Holding owns 100% of the
equity interests in Pro Fit Optix, Inc., PFO Technologies, LLC, PFO
Optima, LLC, and PFO MCO, LLC.

PFO Global, Pro Fit Optix Holding Company, Pro Fit Optix, PFO
Technologies, PFO Optima, and PFO MCO, filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-30355) in Dallas on Jan. 31,
2017.

Rosa R. Orenstein, Esq., and Nathan M. Nichols, Esq., at Orenstein
Law Group, P.C., serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel. Haynes
and Boone, LLP, is their special corporate and securities law
counsel.  Mahesh Shetty, a certified public accountant, is the
Debtor's financial officer.  RBSM, LLP and Litzler, Segner, Shaw &
McKenney LLP serve as accountants.

In February 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors. The committee hired
Shraiberg, Ferrara, Landau & Page, P.A. as legal counsel, and
McCathern, PLLC as local counsel.

On June 21, 2017, Shawn K. Brown was appointed Chapter 11 trustee.
The trustee hired Rochelle McCullough LLP as his bankruptcy
counsel; Litzler, Segner, Shaw & McKenney LLP as accountant; and
Rosen Systems as auctioneer.


PROSPECT-WOODWARD: Exclusivity Period Extended to Feb. 26
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Bruce Harwood of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Hampshire extended the exclusivity period for The
Prospect-Woodward Home to file a Chapter 11 plan to Feb. 26.  

The company can solicit acceptances for the plan until June 26.

                   About Prospect-Woodward Homes

The Prospect-Woodward Home, doing business as Hillside Village
Keene, owns and operates a licensed continuing care retirement
facility with 222 units, comprised of 141 independent living units,
43 assisted living units, 18 memory care units, and 20 licensed but
not yet opened long-term nursing care units located at 95 Wyman
Road, Keene, N.H., comprising approximately 66 acres.

On Aug. 30, 2021, Prospect-Woodward Home sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 21-10523), listing up to $50
million in assets and up to $100 million in liabilities.  Judge
Bruce A. Harwood oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Polsinelli, PC, as bankruptcy counsel; Hinckley,
Allen & Snyder, LLP as special counsel; Silverbloom Consulting, LLC
as financial consultant; and OnePoint Partners, LLC as
restructuring advisor.  Toby B. Shea of OnePoint Partners serves as
the Debtor's chief restructuring officer.  Donlin, Recano &
Company, Inc. is the claims and noticing agent and administrative
agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 1 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Sept. 9, 2021.  Perkins Coie, LLP and McLane
Middleton, Professional Association serve as the committee's lead
bankruptcy counsel and local counsel, respectively.


PUERTO RICO: Has Plans of Recovering From Bankruptcy
----------------------------------------------------
The Conversation reports that Puerto Rico has a plan to recover
from bankruptcy -- but the deal won't ease people's daily
struggles.

Puerto Rico's bankruptcy problem is complicated — but the various
ways the crisis hurts most Puerto Ricans is unmistakable.

Since Puerto Rico declared bankruptcy in 2017, it's become harder
for people to decide where they can afford to live and where their
children can enroll in school.

The island declared a form of bankruptcy in 2017.  At the time, the
island faced historic levels of debt, topping $72 billion.  But
Puerto Rico’s debt crisis, far worse than Detroit's $18 billion
bankruptcy claims in 2014, has now reached a potential turning
point.

U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain approved a large-scale debt
restructuring plan on Jan. 18, 2022, that would cut $33 billion
from Puerto Rico's debt and work to pay back its creditors.

Because Puerto Rico has been a territory of the United States since
1898, the bankruptcy plan unfolded in a unique way that has limited
residents' say over financial cuts to public programs that directly
affect them, angering many Puerto Ricans.

The island's recently announced debt agreement will not make it
easier for citizens to find homes, schools, and jobs.  But it will
fuel and test Puerto Ricans' ability to mobilize politically.

Puerto Rico's controversial bankruptcy crisis

Puerto Rico's money problems, which have grown over the past two
decades, are the result of many factors: Years of borrowing to
cover budget deficits, poor economic growth, political corruption
and a population decline all play a role.

Since Puerto Rico is a U.S. territory, and not a state or city, it
does not have the right to officially file for bankruptcy.

In 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and
Economic Stability Act, a law known as PROMESA, that created a new
government agency. This agency, the Financial Oversight and
Management Board for Puerto Rico, was responsible for laying out
Puerto Rico’s debt repayment strategy.

But local people had no say in the creation or composition of this
board, known simply as the Junta -- meaning council in Spanish.
None of its current seven board members are from the island.
Puerto Ricans have also not been involved in the Junta's financial
decisions.

Puerto Rico's debt was never publicly audited, which lent to public
concerns about lack of transparency in managing this crisis.

The Junta primarily made financial cuts, or austerity measures, to
address the debt.  They achieved an agreement with the Puerto Rican
government to partially pay back its debt.

But, for everyday people, these cuts have worsened their quality of
life.

One unpopular austerity measure the Junta took was freezing public
school teachers' pension plans.  Financial cuts also limited Puerto
Rico's Medicaid spending and have threatened funding for people's
pension plans and public universities.

Thousands of teachers, earning a starting salary of $1,750 a month,
have taken to the streets in protest.  Puerto Rico Governor Pedro
Pierluisi announced on Feb. 8, 2022, that teachers will receive a
temporary monthly raise of $1,000 starting in July 2022.

The teachers' demands echo the sentiment of many Puerto Ricans, who
do not like these austerity measures.

Public schools take a hit

Puerto Rico's Department of Education has regularly closed public
schools over the last few years because of financial cuts, at a
pace that was previously unseen for decades.

Since 2016, 523 schools have closed in Puerto Rico.  The education
department has plans to close 83 schools by 2026, affecting 18,644
students.

Julia Keleher, the former secretary of education in Puerto Rico, is
an advocate of school closings.

Keleher was a polarizing public figure -- she was also a mainland
American official in Puerto Rico -- a reminder of the island's
colonial history. Keleher pleaded guilty to federal fraud
conspiracy charges over mismanagement of public funds in June
2021.

Puerto Rico's Department of Education has new leadership.  But some
specialized arts schools, such as the Central High School in San
Juan, have continued to shut down, prompting online petitions for
change.

School closings more broadly sparked significant protests in San
Juan by parents, students, teachers and politicians over the last
few years. Many working-class students needed to travel farther to
reach open schools that were outside of their communities,
disrupting their learning experience.

Gentrification amps up in Puerto Rico

Rising housing costs compose the latest chapter of Puerto Rico's
layered financial saga.

The housing problem coincides with Puerto Rico attracting foreign
investors with new tax breaks.

Economic development experts have argued that the arrival of new
investors, combined with the Puerto Rico government's tax relief
measures, create new gentrification concerns about affordable
housing. This is particularly true along the coastal regions —
that may hurt Puerto Ricans.

American financier John Paulson is one example of a growing wave of
outsiders who have purchased property in Puerto Rico, seeking to
receive tax breaks.

This investment was made possible by a new law, which aims to
attract wealthy foreigners to the island. It does this by providing
new Puerto Rican residents with exemptions from paying income tax
on all "passive" income, meaning money from investments, for
example.

The net result is significant local resistance to foreign
investors.

Now that a judge has approved Puerto Rico's debt restructuring, the
austerity measures cannot be changed on paper. But Puerto Rico’s
public still has the chance to push back and lobby for change, as
they continue to do through protests to advocate for their
political demands.

                        About Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico is a self-governing commonwealth in association with
the United States that's facing a massive bond debt of $70 billion,
a 68% debt-to-GDP ratio and negative economic growth in nine of
the
last 10 years.

The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico has sought bankruptcy protection,
aiming to restructure its massive $74 billion debt-load and $49
billion in pension obligations.

The debt restructuring petition was filed by Puerto Rico's
financial oversight board in U.S. District Court in Puerto Rico
(Case No. 17-01578) on May 3, 2017, and was made under Title III of
2016's U.S. Congressional rescue law known as the Puerto Rico
Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act ('PROMESA').

The Financial Oversight and Management Board later commenced Title
III cases for the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
(COFINA) on May 5, 2017, and the Employees Retirement System (ERS)
and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority (HTA) on
May 21, 2017. On July 2, 2017, a Title III case was commenced for
the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority ("PREPA").

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts has appointed U.S. District Judge
Laura Taylor Swain to oversee the Title III cases. The Honorable
Judith Dein, a United States Magistrate Judge for the District of
Massachusetts, has been designated to preside over matters that may
be referred to her by Judge Swain, including discovery disputes,
and management of other pretrial proceedings.

Joint administration of the Title III cases, under Lead Case No.
17-3283, was granted on June 29, 2017.

The Oversight Board has hired as advisors, Proskauer Rose LLP and
O'Neill & Borges LLC as legal counsel, McKinsey & Co. as strategic
consultant, Citigroup Global Markets, as municipal investment
banker, and Ernst & Young, as financial advisor.

Martin J. Bienenstock, Esq., Scott K. Rutsky, Esq., and Philip M.
Abelson, Esq., of Proskauer Rose; and Hermann D. Bauer, Esq., at
O'Neill & Borges are on-board as attorneys.

McKinsey & Co. is the Board's strategic consultant, Ernst & Young
is the Board's financial advisor, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
is the Board's municipal investment banker.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.  Prime Clerk
maintains a case web site at
https://cases.primeclerk.com/puertorico

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions LLC is the service agent for ERS, HTA,
and PREPA.

O'Melveny & Myers LLP is counsel to the Commonwealth's Puerto Rico
Fiscal Agency and Financial Advisory Authority (AAFAF), the agency
responsible for negotiations with bondholders.

The Oversight Board named Professor Nancy B. Rapoport as fee
examiner and to chair a committee to review professionals' fees.


PURDUE PHARMA: Sacklers Plan to Add $1-Bil. to Opioid Settlement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jef Feeley, Jeremy Hill and Malathi Nayak of Bloomberg News report
that members of the billionaire Sackler family that own Purdue
Pharma LP are weighing whether to add $1 billion to the
OxyContin-maker's faltering opioid settlement bid in an effort to
win over holdouts, according to people familiar with the offer.

The move would bring the family's total contribution to $5.325
billion to get a handful of state attorneys general to drop their
opposition to Purdue's bankruptcy plan, the people said.  In
return, the states would abandon appeals of the Sacklers' demands
to be freed from liability in current and future opioid lawsuits,
the people added.

"This sounds like a good deal for the Sacklers to me," Carl Tobias,
a University of Richmond law professor who has followed opioid
litigation and the Purdue bankruptcy case.  "They get their
releases for another $1 billion after they helped devastate large
swaths of the country with OxyContin? I doubt it's enough."

Purdue and other companies involved in the opioid industry face
thousands of lawsuits by states and municipalities that allege they
helped create a crisis that's claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives in the U.S. Most of the cases are still pending, though some
companies, including Johnson & Johnson and McKesson Corp., have
proposed broad settlements.

The latest development is a result of court-ordered mediation that
came after a judge in December threw out the original settlement
deal over litigation releases granted to Sackler family members.
That ruling came after some states appealed the deal, saying
Purdue’s owners shouldn't get lifetime immunity from suits
targeting them for the company's role in the U.S. opioid epidemic.

A representative for Purdue Pharma said the mediation is governed
by strict court-ordered confidentiality and declined to comment
further. A representative for the Mortimer Sackler wing of the
family declined to comment. Representatives for the Raymond Sackler
wing of the family didn’t immediately respond to a request for
comment.

                      About Purdue Pharma LP

Purdue Pharma L.P. and its subsidiaries --
http://www.purduepharma.com/-- develop and provide prescription
medicines and consumer products that meet the evolving needs of
healthcare professionals, patients, consumers and caregivers.

Purdue's subsidiaries include Adlon Therapeutics L.P., focused on
treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and
related disorders; Avrio Health L.P., a consumer health  products
company that champions an improved quality of life for people in
the United States through the reimagining of innovative product
solutions; Imbrium Therapeutics L.P., established to further
advance the emerging portfolio and develop the pipeline in the
areas of CNS, non-opioid pain medicines, and select oncology
through internal research, strategic collaborations and
partnerships; and Greenfield Bioventures L.P., an investment
vehicle focused on value-inflection in early stages of clinical
development.

Opioid makers in the U.S. are facing pressure from a crackdown on
the addictive drug in the wake of the opioid crisis and as state
attorneys general file lawsuits against manufacturers. More than
2,000 states, counties, municipalities and Native American
governments have sued Purdue Pharma and other pharmaceutical
companies for their role in the opioid crisis in the U.S., which
has contributed to the more than 700,000 drug overdose deaths in
the U.S. since 1999.

OxyContin, Purdue Pharma's most prominent pain medication, has been
the target of over 2,600 civil actions pending in various state and
federal courts and other fora across the United States and its
territories.

On Sept. 15 and 16, 2019, Purdue Pharma L.P. and 23 affiliated
debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
19-23649), after reaching terms of a preliminary agreement for
settling the massive opioid litigation. The Debtors' consolidated
balance sheet as of Aug. 31, 2019, showed $1.972 billion in assets
and $562 million in liabilities.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain oversees the cases.   

The Debtors tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell, LLP and Dechert, LLP as
legal counsel; PJT Partners as investment banker; AlixPartners as
financial advisor; and Grant Thornton, LLP as tax structuring
consultant. Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Bayard, P.A., represent the
official committee of unsecured creditors appointed in the Debtors'
bankruptcy cases.

David M. Klauder, Esq., is the fee examiner appointed in the
Debtors' cases. The fee examiner is represented by Bielli &
Klauder, LLC.

                          *     *     *

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain in early September 2021 approved
a plan to turn Purdue into a new company (Knoa Pharma LLC) no
longer owned by members of the Sackler family, with its profits
going to fight the opioid epidemic.  The Sackler family agreed to
pay $4.3 billion over nine years to the states and private
plaintiffs and in exchange for a lifetime legal immunity. The deal
resolves some 3,000 lawsuits filed by state and local governments,
Native American tribes, unions, hospitals and others who claimed
the company's marketing of prescription opioids helped spark and
continue an overdose epidemic.

Separate appeals to approval of the Plan have already been filed by
the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee, California, Connecticut, the District
of Columbia, Maryland, Rhode Island and Washington state, plus some
Canadian local governments and other Canadian entities.

Purdue filed its Chapter 11 Plan on March 15, 2021.  A 12th amended
Chapter 11 plan was filed on Sept. 2, 2021, which was confirmed on
Sept. 17.  Purdue divides the claims against it into several
categories, one of which it calls "PI Claims," consisting of claims
"for alleged opioid-related personal injury."  The plan provides
for the creation of the "PI Trust," which will administer all PI
Claims.  The trust will be funded with an initial distribution of
$300 million on the effective date of the Chapter 11 plan, followed
by a distribution of $200 million in 2024, and distributions of
$100 million in 2025 and 2026. In sum, "[t]he PI Trust will receive
at least $700 million in value, and may receive an additional $50
million depending on the amount of proceeds received on account of
certain of Purdue's insurance policies."

The Plan further provides that Purdue's ability to recover from its
insurers will be vested in a "Master Disbursement Trust."  To the
extent any proceeds are recovered from Purdue's insurers with
respect to the PI Claims, up to $450 million of those proceeds will
be channeled from the MDT to the PI Trust. However, the PI Trust
will be funded regardless of whether anything is recovered from
Purdue's insurers.  Instead, "[d]istributions to the PI Trust are
subject to prepayment on a rolling basis as insurance proceeds from
certain of Purdue's insurance policies are received by the MDT and
paid forward to the PI Trust."


PURE BIOSCIENCE: All Three Proposals Passed at Annual Meeting
-------------------------------------------------------------
Pure Bioscience, Inc. held its Annual Meeting, at which the
stockholders:

  (1) elected Tom Y. Lee, CPA, Ivan Chen, Tom Myers, Kristin A.
Taylor, and David M. Rendall as directors, to hold office until
next year's Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their
respective successors are elected and qualified;

  (2) ratified the appointment of Weinberg & Company, P.A. as the
Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending July 31, 2022; and

  (3) approved, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation
of the Company's named executive officers.

                     About PURE Bioscience Inc.

PURE Bioscience, Inc. -- www.purebio.com -- is focused on
developing and commercializing its proprietary antimicrobial
products primarily in the food safety arena.  The Company provides
solutions to combat the health and environmental challenges of
pathogen and hygienic control.  Its technology platform is based on
patented, stabilized ionic silver, and its initial products contain
silver dihydrogen citrate, better known as SDC.  PURE is
headquartered in Rancho Cucamonga, California (San Bernardino
metropolitan area).

PURE Bioscience reported a net loss of $2.32 million for the year
ended July 31, 2021, compared to a net income of $4,000 for the
year ended July 31, 2020.  As of Oct. 31, 2021, the Company had
$3.56 million in total assets, $828,000 in total current
liabilities, and $2.73 million in total stockholders' equity.

Los Angeles, California-based Weinberg and Company, P.A., the
Company's auditor since 2019, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated Oct. 28, 2021, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and negative
cash flows from operating activities that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


QUANTUM CORP: BlackRock Has 6.6% Equity Stake as of Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, BlackRock, Inc. disclosed that as of Dec. 31, 2021, it
beneficially owns 3,932,343 shares of common stock of Quantum
Corporation, representing 6.6 percent of the shares outstanding.  A
full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/709283/000083423722008397/us7479065010_020822.txt

                        About Quantum Corp.

Based in San Jose, California, Quantum Corp. (NYSE:QTM) --
http://www.quantum.com-- provides technology and services that
stores and manages video and video-like data delivering the
industry's top streaming performance for video and rich media
applications, along with low cost, high density massive-scale data
protection and archive systems.  The Company helps customers
capture, create and share digital data and preserve and protect it
for decades.

Quantum reported a net loss of $35.46 million for the year ended
March 31, 2021, a net loss of $5.21 million for the year ended
March 31, 2020, and a net loss of $42.80 million for the year ended
March 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2021, the Company had $187.64
million in total assets, $310.42 million in total liabilities, and
a total stockholders' deficit of $122.78 million.


QUANTUM CORP: Senvest, Richard Mashaal Report 5.26% Equity Stake
----------------------------------------------------------------
Senvest Management, LLC and Richard Mashaal disclosed in a Schedule
13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that as of
Dec. 31, 2021, they beneficially own 3,124,104 shares of common
stock of Quantum Corporation, representing 5.26 percent of the
shares outstanding.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/709283/000090266422001295/p22-0626sc13ga.htm

                        About Quantum Corp.

Based in San Jose, California, Quantum Corp. (NYSE:QTM) --
http://www.quantum.com-- provides technology and services that
stores and manages video and video-like data delivering the
industry's top streaming performance for video and rich media
applications, along with low cost, high density massive-scale data
protection and archive systems.  The Company helps customers
capture, create and share digital data and preserve and protect it
for decades.

Quantum reported a net loss of $35.46 million for the year ended
March 31, 2021, a net loss of $5.21 million for the year ended
March 31, 2020, and a net loss of $42.80 million for the year ended
March 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2021, the Company had $187.64
million in total assets, $310.42 million in total liabilities, and
a total stockholders' deficit of $122.78 million.


RALEY'S: S&P Withdraws 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating
------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings on Raley's,
including its 'B+' issuer credit rating, at the issuer's request.
S&P's outlook on the company was stable at the time of the
withdrawal.



RIVERFRONT CRUISE: Dept. of Revenue Opposes Reorganizing Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
State of Florida, Department of Revenue (Florida), objects to the
Chapter 11 Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Riverfront
Cruise and Anticipation Yacht Charters, LLC, and in support thereof
states:

     * On July 29, 2021, Riverfront Cruise and Anticipation Yacht
Charter, LLC filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

     * At the time of filing, Debtor was indebted to Florida for
Sales and Use Taxes.

     * Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1129 (a)(9)(C) a Chapter 11 plan
is required to provide for regular installment payment for the full
value of the claim with the final payment due no later than 5 years
after the date of the order for relief is entered.

     * The proposed plan fails to meet the requirement of 11 U.S.C.
1191(a) in that it does not provide for regular installment
payments as required but identifies negotiations with a nondebtor
and a nondebtor's payment of the obligation as a substitution.

     * This transfer of the obligation to a nondebtor is not
identified as a viable substitute to the requirements of the
Bankruptcy Code.

     * Florida objects to the plan as proposed.

A full-text copy of the State of Florida's objection dated Feb. 10,
2022, is available at https://bit.ly/3sCQ1Eg from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                   About Riverfront Cruise and
                    Anticipation Yacht Charters

Riverfront Cruise and Anticipation Yacht Charters, LLC, filed its
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-17382) on July 29, 2021.  James
Campbell, the Debtor's member, signed the petition.  In the
petition, the Debtor listed as much as $50,000 in assets and as
much as $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Peter D. Russin presides over the case.

Richard R. Robles, Esq., at the Law Offices of Richard R. Robles,
P.A., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


SCIENTIFIC GAMES: Vanguard Group Has 9.49% Stake as of Dec. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, The Vanguard Group disclosed that as of Dec. 31, 2021,
it beneficially owns 9,162,944 shares of common stock of Scientific
Games Corp., representing 9.49 percent of the shares outstanding.
A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000750004/000110465922018522/tv01848-scientificgamescorp.htm

                         About Scientific Games

Based in Las Vegas, Nevada, Scientific Games Corporation
(NASDAQ:SGMS) -- http://www.scientificgames.com-- is a developer
of technology-based products and services and associated content
for the worldwide gaming, lottery, social and digital gaming
industries. Its portfolio of revenue-generating activities
primarily includes supplying gaming machines and game content,
casino-management systems and table game products and services to
licensed gaming entities; providing instant and draw-based lottery
products, lottery systems and lottery content and services to
lottery operators; providing social casino solutions to retail
consumers and regulated gaming entities, as applicable; and
providing a comprehensive suite of digital RMG and sports wagering
solutions, distribution platforms, content, products and services.

Scientific Games reported a net loss of $548 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, a net loss of $118 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, and a net loss of $352 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $7.85 billion
in total assets, $10.04 billion in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $2.19 billion.


STONEWAY CAPITAL: Seeks to Extend Exclusivity Period to Feb. 28
---------------------------------------------------------------
Stoneway Capital Ltd. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to extend the exclusivity period to
file a Chapter 11 plan to Feb. 28, and the period to solicit
acceptances for the plan to April 29.

The extension, if granted by the court, will give Stoneway more
time to negotiate on the terms of a consensual plan with its
pre-bankruptcy lenders and the steering committee of ad hoc group
of noteholders, according to a motion filed by the company in
court.

The exclusivity motion is on the court's calendar for Feb. 17.

                      About Stoneway Capital

Stoneway Capital Corporation is a limited corporation incorporated
in New Brunswick, Canada, formed for the purpose of owning and
operating, through its Argentine subsidiaries, power generation
projects that will provide electricity to the wholesale electricity
markets in Argentina. The Argentine subsidiaries operate four
power-generating plants in Argentina that provide electricity to
the wholesale electricity market in Argentina.

Stoneway is 100% owned by GRM Energy Investment Limited.

On Oct. 8, 2020, the Company commenced proceedings under the Canada
Business Corporations Act (the "CBCA"). The Debtors were well on
the way toward closing the consensual restructuring when on Dec. 4,
2020, the Argentine Supreme Court issued a decision in an ongoing
noise discharge dispute involving one of the Generation Facilities
located in Pilar, Argentina. The Argentine Supreme Court Decision
created significant uncertainty as it overturned a decision of the
federal appeals court in San Martin, Buenos Aires.

As a result of the looming expiration of the informal standstill
arrangement, the Debtors commenced chapter 11 cases in the U.S. in
order to put the automatic stay in place, maintain the status quo
pending resolution of the various issues in Argentina, and ensure
that neither the Indenture Trustee nor the Argentine Trustee takes
any action that could be detrimental or value destructive to the
Company.

Stoneway Capital Ltd. and five related entities, including Stoneway
Capital Corp., sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-10646) on April 7, 2021. Stoneway estimated
liabilities of $1 billion to $10 billion and assets of $500 million
to $1 billion.

Judge James L. Garrity, Jr., oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Shearman & Sterling LLP as bankruptcy counsel,
Bennett Jones LLP as Canadian counsel, Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as
investment banker, and RSM Canada LLP as tax services provider.
Prime Clerk, LLC is the claims agent and administrative advisor.


SYNIVERSE HOLDINGS: S&P Places 'B-' ICR on CreditWatch Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all ratings on U.S.-based Syniverse
Holdings Inc. that were assigned in conjunction with the proposed
merger, including the 'B-' issuer-credit rating, on CreditWatch
with negative implications.

The CreditWatch placement reflects S&P's view that the termination
of this merger will keep the company's debt levels and leverage
elevated as its transitions its business unless it is able to
complete a new financing arrangement.

S&P plans to resolve the CreditWatch when it has a greater
understanding of the company's plans for the entirety of its
capital structure.

The CreditWatch placement follows Syniverse's announcement that it
will remain a private company and pursue an alternative transaction
following the termination of its merger with special purpose
acquisition company M3-Brigade Acquisition II Corp. Syniverse's
$2.85 billion merger with M3-Brigade was terminated due to
shareholder redemptions that exceeded the minimum level required to
close the deal. The transaction, along with an up to $750 million
investment from Twilio Inc. (not rated) and other private
investment in public equity investments, would have enabled the
company to repay about half of its debt and bolster its liquidity.
Under an alternative transaction, Twilio would invest up to $750
million, contingent on Syniverse completing other equity and debt
financing transactions, which are uncertain at this time. Proceeds
from the additional financing transactions would be used primarily
to repay existing debt.

S&P said, "The CreditWatch placement reflects the potential for a
one-notch downgrade, which will depend on the Syniverse's ability
to secure new financings that would enable it to reduce its debt
such that the capital structure is sustainable, in our view. We
plan to resolve the CreditWatch when we have a greater
understanding of Syniverse's plans for the entirety of its capital
structure."



VEROBLUE FARMS: Bankruptcy Lingers as Investor Challenges Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jane Curtis of The Messenger reports that VeroBlue Farms USA Inc.
has continued to languish in bankruptcy due to a dispute with
FishDish LLC.

VeroBlue Farms USA, once the promising start-up that introduced
aquaculture to Webster City and Hamilton County, filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy in late 2018, disclosing more than $100 million in
debt, most of which was unsecured.  VeroBlue, according to its
bankruptcy petition, owed $98,943,246.22 in unsecured debt to its
top 20 creditors.

Another $6 million in secured debt was assigned to Broadmoor
Financial LP, of Wichita, Kansas, VeroBlue's top creditor.
VeroBlue owed more than $53 million to that firm alone.

So when the bankruptcy court agreed in April 2019 to a modified
plan of Chapter 11 reorganization put forth by Alder Aqua Ltd., a
major stockholder, and Broadmoor, it appeared that the case was
closed.

But not for FishDish, which is another creditor.

According to its appellant's brief filed Jan. 7, 2022, "(i)n the
summer of 2016, to finance their growth, (VeroBlue) raised $63
million in debt and equity financing.  Specifically, (it) raised
$34 million in equity capital by selling preferred shares in VBF
USA to Alder Aqua, Ltd. ($28 million) and FishDish ($6 million).
Certain of the debtors became borrowers under a credit facility in
the original principal amount of $29 million from Amstar Group,
LLC. ... Amstar and Alder have common ownership and control — Dr.
Otto Happel and his immediate family members.  Happel then
leveraged his ownership of Amstar and Alder to assert control over
the VeroBlue by installing his daughter onto its board and
directing his other board appointees to dominate board decision
making, even in the face of contrary board direction."

The original 2016 business plan, the brief states, "involved
reliance on local Iowa farmers as 'designated growers' to assist
the aquaculture production at different points in the fish
lifecycle. ... these local farmers and other individuals with ties
to the local business community (were afforded) the opportunity to
invest by purchasing common shares in the parent company 'VBF
Canada' -- a Canadian corporation originally formed as the sole
shareholder of VBF USA. ... Approximately 74 individuals or
entities invested in this parent of (VeroBlue), many of them local
Iowans ..."

In 2016, VeroBlue refinanced its debt with both Alder and Amstar,
and, eventually, VBF Canada became a minority interest shareholder
of VeroBlue.

FishDish, with $6 million skin in the game, immediately appealed
the Chapter 11 reorganization plan proposed by Alder and Broadmoor.
That October, its appeal was denied by the United States District
Court of the Northern District of Iowa.

Then FishDish appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit.  That court reversed a critical portion of the
previous dismissal: "We reverse and remand for reconsideration the
District Court's dismissal of FishDish's appeal of the Plan
Confirmation Order on the ground of equitable mootness."

The appellant's brief put it this way: "The Bankruptcy Court
deprived FishDish of its rightful opportunity to meaningfully
participate in the bankruptcy cases, thereby preventing it from
taking the necessary steps to realize any recovery from its $6
million investment."

The decision drew the attention of Wall Street Journal writer
Andrew Scurria, who wrote. "Federal judges shouldn't be too quick
to dispense with appeals that challenge the approval of a Chapter
11 plan," a U.S. appeals court said.

"The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit released a
decision Thursday (Aug. 5, 2021) critiquing the application of
'equitable mootness,' a legal doctrine developed over years that
shields many bankruptcy-court rulings from appellate review."

"While the standard varies among federal appeals courts, equitable
mootness generally holds that certain aspects of Chapter 11
proceedings are effectively unreviewable on appeal, because to
reverse them would require unwinding transactions that have already
occurred."

In December 2020, NaturalShrimp, Inc., another aquaculture company,
bought the former VeroBlue Farms assets from Alder Aqua.

Despite that sale, FishDish's appeals have kept the case alive.

"[T]he Eighth Circuit has articulated an olfactory standard for
clearly erroneous as 'a high one to meet;'" the appellant's brief
asserts." 'To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike us as
more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must ... strike us as
wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead
fish.'"

                     About Veroblue Farms USA

Headquartered in Webster City, Iowa, VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc. --
http://verobluefarms.com/-- operates a fish farm specializing in
Barramundi, a freshwater fish found in the Indo-Pacific waters of
Australia. It created an innovative aquaculture system that
utilizes the natural elements of air, water and care.

VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc., VBF Operations Inc., VBF Transport Inc.,
VBF IP Inc., and Iowa's First Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Iowa Lead Case No.
18-01297)
on Sept. 21, 2018. In the petitions signed by Norman McCowan,
president, VeroBlue estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The Debtors tapped Elderkin & Pirnie, PLC and Ag & Business Legal
Strategies, P.C. as their legal counsel; and Alex Moglia and his
firm Moglia Advisors as chief restructuring officer.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Oct. 24, 2018.  The Committee retained
Goldstein & McClintock LLLP as its counsel.


VISTAGEN THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $10.5M Net Loss in Third Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
VistaGen Therapeutics, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
and comprehensive loss of $10.54 million on $357,900 of total
revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2021, compared to a
net loss and comprehensive loss of $5.30 million on $313,600 of
total revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2020.

For the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2021, the Company reported a net
loss and comprehensive loss of $31.07 million on $1.07 million of
total revenues compared to a net loss and comprehensive loss of
$11.72 million on $647,600 of total revenues for the nine months
ended Dec. 31, 2020.

As of Dec. 31, 2021, the Company had $90.54 million in total
assets, $10.56 million in total liabilities, and $79.98 million in
total stockholders' equity.

At Dec. 31, 2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $83.7 million.

As of Feb. 9, 2022, the Company had 209,527,955 shares of common
stock outstanding.

"Our team is working tirelessly to advance the development of novel
therapies to address urgent and growing mental health disorders.
Our third quarter results reflect strong execution and progress
against our strategy to realize the promise of our differentiated
CNS pipeline," stated Shawn Singh, chief executive officer of
VistaGen.  "As we anticipate Phase 3 data for studies in our
PALISADE program for PH94B in social anxiety disorder later this
year, we are expanding our clinical programs to explore compelling
opportunities to redefine the standard of care for several
additional mental health conditions.  I am extremely proud of our
team and the bold advances we have made toward developing
potentially life-changing medicines.  Our forward momentum reflects
the relentless commitment to our passion and purpose of delivering
transformative therapies to address the unmet mental health needs
of patients worldwide."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001411685/000143774922003009/vtgn20211231_10q.htm

                          About VistaGen

Headquartered in San Francisco, California, VistaGen Therapeutics
-- http://www.vistagen.com-- is a biopharmaceutical company
committed to developing and commercializing innovative medicines
with the potential to go beyond the current standard of care for
anxiety, depression, and other CNS disorders.

VistaGen reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $17.93
million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, a net loss and
comprehensive loss of $20.77 million for the year ended March 31,
2020, and a net loss and comprehensive loss of $24.59 million for
the year ended March 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company
had $103.91 million in total assets, $18.29 million in total
liabilities, and $85.62 million in total stockholders' equity.


WCOP INC: April 7 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
-----------------------------------------------
On January 25, 2022, Debtor WCOP, Inc. filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois a Third
Modified Subchapter V Plan of Reorganization.  On Feb. 10, 2022,
Judge Lashonda A. Hunt ordered that:

     * March 25, 2022 is the deadline for creditors entitled to
vote upon the Plan to file by written ballot, written acceptances
or rejections of the Plan, and for filing and serving voting
ballots for acceptance or rejection of the Plan.

     * April 7, 2022, at 11:30 am is fixed for the hearing on
confirmation of the Plan.

     * March 25, 2022 is fixed as the last day for filing and
serving written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 10, 2022, is available at
https://bit.ly/33fpT9E from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Chapter 11 Estate:

     J. Kevin Benjamin, Esq.
     Theresa S. Benjamin, Esq.
     Benjamin Legal Services PLC
     1016 West Jackson Blvd.
     Chicago, Illinois 60607-2914
     Phone: (312) 853-3100

                      About WCOP Inc.

Chicago-based WCOP, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Ill. Case No. 21-04679) on April 9, 2021. In the petition signed by
Pasquale Lucchetto, president, the Debtor disclosed total assets of
up to $50,000 and total liabilities of up to $10 million.  

Judge Lashonda A. Hunt presides over the case.  

Kevin Benjamin, Esq., of Benjamin Legal Services, PLC and Bill J.
Marinakos of Tsoutsias, Balabanos & Associates, Ltd., serve as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel and accountant, respectively.


WHITE RABBIT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: White Rabbit Ventures, Inc.
          d/b/a Matrix Roofing
          d/b/a Matrix Roofing & Home Solutions
          d/b/a Matrix Roof + Home
       9321 NE 72nd Ave #2
       Vancouver, WA 98665

Business Description: White Rabbit Ventures provides roofing and
                      home solutions to homeowners and commercial
                      property managers in Vancouver, Portland and
                      surrounding areas.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 14, 2022

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Washington

Case No.: 22-40173

Debtor's Counsel: Geoffrey Groshong, Esq.
                  GROSHONG LAW PLLC
                  600 Stewart Street
                  Suite 1300
                  Seattle, WA 98101
                  Tel: 206-508-0585
                  Email: geoff@groshonglaw.com

Total Assets: $592,291

Total Liabilities: $1,910,956

The petition was signed by Wendy J. Marvin as CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/7B2YFBA/White_Rabbit_Ventures_Inc__wawbke-22-40173__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


[*] Chapter 11 Attractive to International Airlines
---------------------------------------------------
Sumit Singh of Simple Flying reports that even though Chapter 11
refers to US law, numerous international airlines have filed for
bankruptcy under this code in recent years.

Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, more commonly
referred to as just Chapter 11, allows a business time to
restructure its debts. Ultimately, the company is offered a fresh
start following the submission of a reorganization plan compromised
between the major stakeholders, including the debtor and
creditors.

                        A saving grace

From General Motors to K-Kmart, some of the biggest names in US
business history have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, helping them
to continue holding a strong presence in society today. Therefore,
it’s not a surprise that airlines in the country have also opted
to undergo the same process to help them with their finances
following industry challenges.

Chapter 11 doesn't always end with a new lease of life. A prime
example of this is when Pan American sought Chapter 11 protection
in early 1991 before ceasing operations at the end of the same
year.

Yet, over the years, the procedure has supported other legacy
carriers such as American Airlines and United Airlines to carry on
their dominance across the aviation spectrum. In recent years,
Chapter 11 has helped the likes of Ravn Alaska bounce back and
maintain essential services in the country.

                       Global opportunities

What is more compelling is the fact that many international
carriers have been undergoing Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings
despite not being based in the United States. Three names that
stand out when it comes to recent international carrier bankruptcy
filings are Aeromexico, Avianca, and LATAM. These operators are
notably not headquartered in the US but were eligible and chose to
go through Chapter 11 filings.

           LATAM Airlines Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner CC-BBF

With several branches, LATAM has managed to show promising recovery
signs following the long-term difficulties in some of its key
markets.

Altogether, a foreign operator only needs minimal ties to the US to
be valid for the benefits of the country's bankruptcy code. In
practice, even if an airline group has one property in the US, it
can be chosen as the company's main place of business or where its
core assets are based.

With this trio of Latin American carriers operating at airports in
the US while holding cash assets and property in the country, they
are eligible for Chapter 11.  Like other international airlines,
all three also serve many other countries across the continents.
Still, they chose the US to file undergo restructuring.  A prime
reason is that the US code defines estate property to involve
assets wherever they are in the world.  So, the US court has
jurisdiction over the airline's assets worldwide, streamlining the
approach.

                          Broader benefits

This factor has a domino effect on the advantages to be had with
the proceedings. W ith such a global presence, an international
carrier can smoothly restructure without having to deal with many
of the potentially complex processes in the markets they serve.


[*] Sen. Whitehouse Closes Corporate Bankruptcy Abuse Hearings
--------------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 10, 2022, Chairman Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) led the Senate
Judiciary Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action,
and Federal Rights in a hearing entitled, "Abusing Chapter 11:
Corporate Efforts to Side-Step Accountability Through Bankruptcy."
The hearing examined the growing trend of corporate actors using a
bankruptcy procedure known as the "Texas Two-Step" to attempt to
evade tort liabilities and make it more burdensome for tort
plaintiffs to recover. Chairman Whitehouse closed the hearing with
the following statement and the path forward for a legislative
solution to the issue:

"It does not make sense for a $450 billion corporation with 38,000
people with potentially lethal injuries to be able to carve off $2
billion . . . and walk away from the responsibility for what it
did. And with respect to the questions of fairness and efficiency,
there's a larger scope for fairness here, in which it looks like
big companies are getting away with dodging real responsibilities
by using complicated trickery that ordinary people don’t have
access to. [T]he result [is] that they create delays that cause
people like Ms. Naranjo to get actually no recovery in her
lifetime. So, that’s neither efficient nor fair."

Whitehouse added, "I hope we can find a sensible way to solve
this."

The subcommittee heard from the following witnesses. Included here
is the witnesses' written testimony:

* The Honorable Judith K. Fitzgerald, Shareholder, Tucker
Arensberg, P.C. [testimony]
* Mr. David A. Skeel, Jr., S. Samuel Arsht Professor of Corporate
Law, University of Pennsylvania Law
  School [testimony]
* Ms. Kimberly Ann Naranjo [testimony]
* Mr. Paul H. Zumbro, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP [testimony]
* Mr. Kevin C. Maclay, Caplin & Drysdale [testimony]

Text of Whitehouse’s as-delivered opening remarks is below.

We are here to address a novel and rather troubling circumstance
that is emerging in bankruptcy law.

Imagine that a big corporation wreaks serious harm on you and your
family. You sue for damages to cover hospital bills, or to care for
a family member. But when you do, you discover that your claim
against the company — a company that is out there operating,
apparently thriving in the marketplace – your claim is somehow in
bankruptcy court that may not be heard for months or years, and it
may never be paid.

Sadly, this situation is not imaginary. The so-called Texas
Two-Step has mired tens of thousands of claims in bankruptcy
proceedings.

It is bankruptcy's aim to grant honest but unfortunate debtors a
fresh start, while doing the utmost to make creditors whole. But in
recent years, large corporations on solid financial footing have
found a bankruptcy trick to shirk responsibility for hurting
Americans.

Here's how it works:

First, a corporation with claims against it from people that have
been harmed transforms into a Texas corporate entity.

Second, that new entity exploits a Texas law allowing something
called a "divisive merger," splitting the corporation into two
corporations. Company one is saddled with the claims; company two
takes the corporate assets.

The company saddled with the claims then files for bankruptcy,
perhaps in North Carolina where the Fourth Circuit makes it nearly
impossible for victims to have the company's filing dismissed for
bad faith. Victims harmed by the corporation are left in bankruptcy
proceedings that can take years to resolve, condemned to receive
only a fraction of what they're owed.

Meanwhile, the company with the corporate assets continues business
as usual, shed of the claims.
That's the "Texas Two-Step." Although, to be fair, the same thing
can potentially be done under Delaware law.

The originator of this move is perhaps the most prolific industrial
polluter in American history, Koch Industries. In 2017, it used the
Texas Two-Step to dump its subsidiary's asbestos liabilities.
Victims are still tied up in the bankruptcy process, as are
asbestos claimants in ensuing copycat cases.

Johnson & Johnson—one of the biggest and richest companies in the
world—last year faced over 38,000 lawsuits alleging that its
talc-based baby powder contained asbestos and caused ovarian cancer
and mesothelioma. Johnson & Johnson followed the Koch Industries
model, and hatched a shell company that took on the talc liability
and filed for bankruptcy. Johnson & Johnson now seeks a stay of all
those claims, pending bankruptcy proceedings.

This move presents four big concerns:

First, it violates the fundamental principle of bankruptcy that a
company is forgiven its debts but it must offer up all its assets
to creditors. Then it gets a fresh start. The Texas Two-Step
separates the assets from the liabilities in violation of this
basic principle.

Second, it denies people their day in court. The civil jury has
been a bastion of individual rights throughout our history,
allowing people a vital check on the most powerful forces arrayed
against them. The Texas Two-Step denies victims a jury of their
peers, defeating the Seventh Amendment in our Bill of Rights.

Third, it encourages forum-shopping. Johnson & Johnson had no
particular reason to file for bankruptcy in North Carolina; in
fact, Johnson & Johnson’s Texan liability shell only existed for
two days before it filed bankruptcy. Outcomes in court should not
be determined by strategic forum shopping.

Finally, the Texas Two-Step mires victims in protracted
proceedings, robbing them of precious time. Asbestos victims can
die of mesothelioma and other types of cancers before their claims
are heard. That is a blot on our legal system.

So far, this trick has hit asbestos victims, but once this Two-Step
strategy catches on, it could deprive all sorts of victims of the
compensation they're due, and undermine the integrity of other
creditor-debtor relationships. Hiding assets in a bankruptcy is a
serious wrong; the Texas Two-Step uses a trick of corporate law to
hide assets in plain view, with courts’ connivance.

I thank Senator Kennedy for his bipartisan approach to this
hearing. I hope that we can work in a bipartisan fashion to address
this abuse of our bankruptcy process and to make sure that injured
victims get their day in court as our constitution entitles them
to.


[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet
------------------------------------------------

                                               Total
                                              Share-      Total
                                   Total    Holders'    Working
                                  Assets      Equity    Capital
  Company         Ticker            ($MM)       ($MM)      ($MM)
  -------         ------          ------    --------    -------
ACCELERATE DIAGN  AXDX US           81.2       (39.7)      64.0
ACCELERATE DIAGN  AXDX* MM          81.2       (39.7)      64.0
AEMETIS INC       DW51 GR          147.0      (132.1)     (57.6)
AEMETIS INC       AMTX US          147.0      (132.1)     (57.6)
AEMETIS INC       AMTXGEUR EU      147.0      (132.1)     (57.6)
AEMETIS INC       AMTXGEUR EZ      147.0      (132.1)     (57.6)
AEMETIS INC       DW51 GZ          147.0      (132.1)     (57.6)
AEMETIS INC       DW51 TH          147.0      (132.1)     (57.6)
AEMETIS INC       DW51 QT          147.0      (132.1)     (57.6)
AERIE PHARMACEUT  AERI US          351.8       (72.9)     157.8
AERIE PHARMACEUT  AERIEUR EU       351.8       (72.9)     157.8
AERIE PHARMACEUT  0P0 GR           351.8       (72.9)     157.8
AERIE PHARMACEUT  0P0 TH           351.8       (72.9)     157.8
AERIE PHARMACEUT  0P0 QT           351.8       (72.9)     157.8
AERIE PHARMACEUT  0P0 GZ           351.8       (72.9)     157.8
AGRIFY CORP       AGFY US          159.3       134.7      109.9
ALPHA CAPITAL -A  ASPC US          231.1       212.7        1.0
ALPHA CAPITAL AC  ASPCU US         231.1       212.7        1.0
ALTENERGY ACQU-A  AEAE US            0.5        (0.1)      (0.1)
ALTENERGY ACQUIS  AEAEU US           0.5        (0.1)      (0.1)
ALTICE USA INC-A  ATUS US       33,432.7    (1,132.7)  (2,824.2)
ALTICE USA INC-A  15PA TH       33,432.7    (1,132.7)  (2,824.2)
ALTICE USA INC-A  15PA GR       33,432.7    (1,132.7)  (2,824.2)
ALTICE USA INC-A  ATUSEUR EU    33,432.7    (1,132.7)  (2,824.2)
ALTICE USA INC-A  15PA GZ       33,432.7    (1,132.7)  (2,824.2)
ALTICE USA INC-A  ATUS* MM      33,432.7    (1,132.7)  (2,824.2)
ALTICE USA INC-A  ATUS-RM RM    33,432.7    (1,132.7)  (2,824.2)
ALTIRA GP-CEDEAR  MOC AR        39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTIRA GP-CEDEAR  MOD AR        39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTIRA GP-CEDEAR  MO AR         39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MO SW         39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MO US         39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  PHM7 TH       39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MO TE         39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  PHM7 GR       39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MOEUR EU      39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MO CI         39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  PHM7 GZ       39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  0R31 LI       39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MO* MM        39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  ALTR AV       39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MOUSD SW      39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MOEUR EZ      39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  PHM7 QT       39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP INC  MO-RM RM      39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
ALTRIA GROUP-BDR  MOOO34 BZ     39,523.0    (1,606.0)  (2,496.0)
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AMC US        11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AH9 GR        11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AMC4EUR EU    11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AMC* MM       11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AH9 TH        11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AH9 QT        11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AH9 GZ        11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  AMC-RM RM     11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMC ENTERTAINMEN  A2MC34 BZ     11,057.5    (1,642.7)     173.8
AMERICAN AIR-BDR  AALL34 BZ     66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL US        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GR        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL* MM       66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G TH        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GZ        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL11EUR EU   66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL AV        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL TE        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G SW        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL11EUR EZ   66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G QT        66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL-RM RM     66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL_KZ KZ     66,442.0    (7,340.0)  (1,669.0)
AMPLIFY ENERGY C  2OQ TH           405.9      (100.2)     (69.3)
AMPLIFY ENERGY C  AMPY US          405.9      (100.2)     (69.3)
AMPLIFY ENERGY C  MPO2EUR EU       405.9      (100.2)     (69.3)
AMPLIFY ENERGY C  2OQ GZ           405.9      (100.2)     (69.3)
AMYRIS INC        AMRS US          542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 GR          542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 TH          542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 SW          542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        AMRSEUR EZ       542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 QT          542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        AMRSEUR EU       542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 GZ          542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
AMYRIS INC        AMRS* MM         542.3       (53.3)    (182.0)
APELLIS PHARMACE  1JK TH           525.7       (57.3)     381.2
APELLIS PHARMACE  1JK GR           525.7       (57.3)     381.2
APELLIS PHARMACE  APLSEUR EU       525.7       (57.3)     381.2
APELLIS PHARMACE  APLS US          525.7       (57.3)     381.2
APOLLO ENDOSURGE  APEN US           71.1        (0.1)      39.0
APOLLO ENDOSURGE  HQ8F GR           71.1        (0.1)      39.0
APOLLO ENDOSURGE  APEN1EUR EU       71.1        (0.1)      39.0
APOLLO ENDOSURGE  HQ8F TH           71.1        (0.1)      39.0
ARCH BIOPARTNERS  ARCH CN            2.7        (3.9)      (0.5)
ARCHIMEDES TECH   ATSPU US         133.8       133.5        0.6
ARCHIMEDES- SUB   ATSPT US         133.8       133.5        0.6
ARTERIS INC       AIP US            40.6       (15.0)     (12.2)
ASCENT SOLAR TEC  ASTID US          11.4        (4.6)       1.8
ATLAS TECHNICAL   ATCX US          420.1      (144.9)     103.2
AUSTERLITZ ACQ-A  AUS US           692.9       614.7       (5.4)
AUSTERLITZ ACQUI  AUS/U US         692.9       614.7       (5.4)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO US        14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GR        14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TH        14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EZ     14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GZ        14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO AV        14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TE        14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO* MM       14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EU     14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 QT        14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO-RM RM     14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AUTOZONE INC-BDR  AZOI34 BZ     14,460.9    (2,124.7)  (1,738.7)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVID US          248.9      (126.4)      (6.5)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GR           248.9      (126.4)      (6.5)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD TH           248.9      (126.4)      (6.5)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GZ           248.9      (126.4)      (6.5)
AVIS BUD-CEDEAR   CAR AR        21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
AVIS BUDGET GROU  CAR US        21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
AVIS BUDGET GROU  CUCA GR       21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
AVIS BUDGET GROU  CUCA TH       21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
AVIS BUDGET GROU  CAR* MM       21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
AVIS BUDGET GROU  CUCA QT       21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
AVIS BUDGET GROU  CAR2EUR EU    21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
AVIS BUDGET GROU  CUCA GZ       21,610.0      (198.0)    (231.0)
BACKBLAZE INC-A   BLZE US           60.4       (12.1)     (32.1)
BANYAN ACQUISITI  BYN/U US           0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
BATH & BODY WORK  BBWI US        6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  LTD0 TH        6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  LTD0 GR        6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  LBEUR EZ       6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  BBWI* MM       6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  LTD0 QT        6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  BBWI AV        6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  LBEUR EU       6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  LTD0 GZ        6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BATH & BODY WORK  BBWI-RM RM     6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  BHC US        29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  BHC CN        29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  BVF GR        29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  BVF GZ        29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  BVF TH        29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  VRX1EUR EZ    29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  BVF QT        29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  VRX1EUR EU    29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  VRX SW        29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BAUSCH HEALTH CO  BHCN MM       29,252.0      (135.0)    (113.0)
BELLRING BRAND-A  BRBR US          600.6       (46.9)     151.9
BELLRING BRAND-A  BR6 TH           600.6       (46.9)     151.9
BELLRING BRAND-A  BR6 GR           600.6       (46.9)     151.9
BELLRING BRAND-A  BR6 GZ           600.6       (46.9)     151.9
BELLRING BRAND-A  BRBR1EUR EU      600.6       (46.9)     151.9
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFT US          252.4        (2.0)      65.9
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BTF GR           252.4        (2.0)      65.9
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFTEUR EU       252.4        (2.0)      65.9
BIGBEAR.AI HOLDI  BBAI US          360.3       344.9       (1.1)
BIGBEAR.AI HOLDI  28K1 GR          360.3       344.9       (1.1)
BIGBEAR.AI HOLDI  GIG2EUR EU       360.3       344.9       (1.1)
BIGBEAR.AI HOLDI  28K1 GZ          360.3       344.9       (1.1)
BIOCRYST PHARM    BCRX US          265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOCRYST PHARM    BO1 GR           265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOCRYST PHARM    BO1 TH           265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOCRYST PHARM    BO1 SW           265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOCRYST PHARM    BCRXEUR EZ       265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOCRYST PHARM    BCRXEUR EU       265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOCRYST PHARM    BO1 QT           265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOCRYST PHARM    BCRX* MM         265.8      (147.0)     119.1
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  BHVN US        1,131.2      (531.2)     482.1
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  2VN GR         1,131.2      (531.2)     482.1
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  BHVNEUR EU     1,131.2      (531.2)     482.1
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  2VN TH         1,131.2      (531.2)     482.1
BLUEACACIA LTD    BLEUU US         254.7        (7.8)      (7.8)
BLUEACACIA LTD-A  BLEU US          254.7        (7.8)      (7.8)
BOEING CO-BDR     BOEI34 BZ    138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO-CED     BAD AR       138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO-CED     BA AR        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA EU        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA PE        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BOE LN       138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BOEI BB      138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA US        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO TH       138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA SW        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA* MM       138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA TE        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO GR       138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BAEUR EU     138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA CI        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO GZ       138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA AV        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA-RM RM     138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BAUSD SW     138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BAEUR EZ     138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA EZ        138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCOD PO      138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BCO QT       138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BACL CI      138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE     BA_KZ KZ     138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOEING CO/THE TR  TCXBOE AU    138,552.0   (14,846.0)  26,674.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDBN MM      12,764.0    (3,089.0)     713.0
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA  BBIOEUR EU       781.5      (735.9)     543.9
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA  2CL GZ           781.5      (735.9)     543.9
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA  2CL TH           781.5      (735.9)     543.9
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA  BBIO US          781.5      (735.9)     543.9
BRIDGEBIO PHARMA  2CL GR           781.5      (735.9)     543.9
BRIDGEMARQ REAL   BRE CN            84.3       (55.8)       9.9
BRIGHTSPHERE INV  2B9 GR           714.8       (17.6)       -
BRIGHTSPHERE INV  BSIGEUR EU       714.8       (17.6)       -
BRIGHTSPHERE INV  BSIG US          714.8       (17.6)       -
BRINKER INTL      EAT US         2,457.3      (327.4)    (348.8)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ GR         2,457.3      (327.4)    (348.8)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ TH         2,457.3      (327.4)    (348.8)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ QT         2,457.3      (327.4)    (348.8)
BRINKER INTL      EAT2EUR EU     2,457.3      (327.4)    (348.8)
BRINKER INTL      EAT2EUR EZ     2,457.3      (327.4)    (348.8)
BROOKFIELD INF-A  BIPC US        9,176.0    (1,148.0)  (2,097.0)
BROOKFIELD INF-A  BIPC CN        9,176.0    (1,148.0)  (2,097.0)
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOO CN         4,572.6      (226.8)     252.5
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A GR        4,572.6      (226.8)     252.5
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOOO US        4,572.6      (226.8)     252.5
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOOEUR EU      4,572.6      (226.8)     252.5
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A GZ        4,572.6      (226.8)     252.5
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A TH        4,572.6      (226.8)     252.5
CACTUS ACQUISITI  CCTSU US           0.2        (0.3)      (0.3)
CACTUS ACQUISITI  CCTS US            0.2        (0.3)      (0.3)
CALUMET SPECIALT  CLMT US        1,833.9      (300.2)    (273.4)
CARBON STREAMING  OFSTF US           -          (0.5)      (0.5)
CARBON STREAMING  NETZ CN            -          (0.5)      (0.5)
CARBON STREAMING  M2Q GR             -          (0.5)      (0.5)
CARBON STREAMING  OFSTFEUR EU        -          (0.5)      (0.5)
CARBON STREAMING  M2Q GZ             -          (0.5)      (0.5)
CEDAR FAIR LP     FUN US         2,814.5      (682.6)     331.8
CENTRUS ENERGY-A  4CU TH           487.2      (229.1)      79.0
CENTRUS ENERGY-A  4CU GR           487.2      (229.1)      79.0
CENTRUS ENERGY-A  LEU US           487.2      (229.1)      79.0
CENTRUS ENERGY-A  LEUEUR EU        487.2      (229.1)      79.0
CENTRUS ENERGY-A  4CU GZ           487.2      (229.1)      79.0
CHOICE CONSOLIDA  CDXX-U/U CN      173.8        (3.3)       -
CHOICE CONSOLIDA  CDXXF US         173.8        (3.3)       -
CINEPLEX INC      CPXGF US       2,114.8      (219.7)    (414.4)
CINEPLEX INC      CX0 GR         2,114.8      (219.7)    (414.4)
CINEPLEX INC      CGX CN         2,114.8      (219.7)    (414.4)
CINEPLEX INC      CGXEUR EU      2,114.8      (219.7)    (414.4)
CINEPLEX INC      CX0 TH         2,114.8      (219.7)    (414.4)
CINEPLEX INC      CGXN MM        2,114.8      (219.7)    (414.4)
CINEPLEX INC      CX0 GZ         2,114.8      (219.7)    (414.4)
CLEAR CHANNEL OU  CCO US         5,365.3    (3,287.8)     110.8
CLEARWATER AN-A   CWAN US          326.6       242.4      272.9
COEPTIS THERAPEU  COEP US            0.2        (0.6)      (0.6)
COGENT COMMUNICA  OGM1 GR        1,008.7      (356.8)     337.1
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOI US        1,008.7      (356.8)     337.1
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOIEUR EU     1,008.7      (356.8)     337.1
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOI* MM       1,008.7      (356.8)     337.1
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH US        15,670.0    (1,000.0)   1,087.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 GR        15,670.0    (1,000.0)   1,087.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 QT        15,670.0    (1,000.0)   1,087.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH1EUR EU    15,670.0    (1,000.0)   1,087.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 TH        15,670.0    (1,000.0)   1,087.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 GZ        15,670.0    (1,000.0)   1,087.0
COVEO SOLUTIONS   CVO CN           273.7       210.6      157.3
CPI CARD GROUP I  PMTS US          252.3      (122.5)      86.0
CRIXUS BH3 ACQ-A  BHAC US            0.3        (0.0)      (0.3)
CRIXUS BH3 ACQUI  BHACU US           0.3        (0.0)      (0.3)
D2L INC           DTOL CN          123.1      (201.4)    (224.6)
DECARBONIZATIO-A  DCRD US          321.4       (57.0)       0.9
DECARBONIZATION   DCRDU US         321.4       (57.0)       0.9
DEEP MEDICI-CL A  DMAQ US            0.4        (0.1)       0.4
DELEK LOGISTICS   DKL US           930.5      (104.8)     (61.5)
DENNY'S CORP      DENN US          411.0       (89.6)     (43.5)
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 GR           411.0       (89.6)     (43.5)
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 TH           411.0       (89.6)     (43.5)
DENNY'S CORP      DENNEUR EU       411.0       (89.6)     (43.5)
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 GZ           411.0       (89.6)     (43.5)
DIALOGUE HEALTH   CARE CN          142.0       126.1      112.3
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD GR         3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD US         3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD SW         3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBDEUR EU      3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBDEUR EZ      3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD TH         3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD QT         3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIEBOLD NIXDORF   DBD GZ         3,507.2      (837.0)     137.9
DIGITAL MEDIA-A   DMS US           267.9       (46.2)      19.5
DINE BRANDS GLOB  DIN US         1,922.5      (254.3)     148.7
DINE BRANDS GLOB  IHP GR         1,922.5      (254.3)     148.7
DINE BRANDS GLOB  IHP TH         1,922.5      (254.3)     148.7
DINE BRANDS GLOB  IHP GZ         1,922.5      (254.3)     148.7
DMY TECHNOLOGY G  DMYS US            0.5        (0.1)      (0.5)
DMY TECHNOLOGY G  DMYS/U US          0.5        (0.1)      (0.5)
DOMINO'S P - BDR  D2PZ34 BZ      1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GR         1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ US         1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV TH         1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZEUR EU      1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GZ         1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZEUR EZ      1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ AV         1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ* MM        1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV QT         1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ-RM RM      1,764.4    (4,127.5)     429.6
DOMO INC- CL B    DOMO US          211.1      (112.6)     (46.2)
DOMO INC- CL B    1ON GR           211.1      (112.6)     (46.2)
DOMO INC- CL B    DOMOEUR EU       211.1      (112.6)     (46.2)
DOMO INC- CL B    1ON GZ           211.1      (112.6)     (46.2)
DOMO INC- CL B    1ON TH           211.1      (112.6)     (46.2)
DROPBOX INC-A     DBX US         3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     1Q5 GR         3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     1Q5 SW         3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     1Q5 TH         3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     DBXEUR EU      3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     1Q5 QT         3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     DBX AV         3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     DBXEUR EZ      3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     DBX* MM        3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     1Q5 GZ         3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
DROPBOX INC-A     DBX-RM RM      3,339.1      (162.6)     881.2
EAST RESOURCES A  ERESU US         345.3       (40.5)     (40.5)
EAST RESOURCES-A  ERES US          345.3       (40.5)     (40.5)
EFFECTOR THERAPE  EFTR US           59.9        (7.7)      12.6
EFFECTOR THERAPE  EFTREUR EU        59.9        (7.7)      12.6
EFFECTOR THERAPE  LWK1 GR           59.9        (7.7)      12.6
ENFUSION INC - A  ENFN US           49.6       (59.8)      19.2
ESPERION THERAPE  ESPR US          225.3      (362.7)      92.2
ESPERION THERAPE  ESPREUR EZ       225.3      (362.7)      92.2
ESPERION THERAPE  0ET TH           225.3      (362.7)      92.2
ESPERION THERAPE  ESPREUR EU       225.3      (362.7)      92.2
ESPERION THERAPE  0ET QT           225.3      (362.7)      92.2
ESPERION THERAPE  0ET GR           225.3      (362.7)      92.2
ESPERION THERAPE  0ET GZ           225.3      (362.7)      92.2
EXCELFIN ACQUI-A  XFIN US            0.4        (0.2)      (0.6)
EXCELFIN ACQUISI  XFINU US           0.4        (0.2)      (0.6)
EXPRESS INC       EXPR US        1,324.1        (8.2)    (112.7)
EXPRESS INC       02Z TH         1,324.1        (8.2)    (112.7)
EXPRESS INC       02Z GR         1,324.1        (8.2)    (112.7)
EXPRESS INC       EXPREUR EU     1,324.1        (8.2)    (112.7)
EXPRESS INC       02Z QT         1,324.1        (8.2)    (112.7)
EXPRESS INC       02Z GZ         1,324.1        (8.2)    (112.7)
F45 TRAINING HOL  FXLV US          166.6       110.9       59.9
F45 TRAINING HOL  4OP GR           166.6       110.9       59.9
F45 TRAINING HOL  FXLVEUR EU       166.6       110.9       59.9
F45 TRAINING HOL  4OP TH           166.6       110.9       59.9
F45 TRAINING HOL  4OP GZ           166.6       110.9       59.9
F45 TRAINING HOL  4OP QT           166.6       110.9       59.9
FAIR ISAAC CORP   FRI GR         1,463.3      (538.3)     140.2
FAIR ISAAC CORP   FICO US        1,463.3      (538.3)     140.2
FAIR ISAAC CORP   FRI GZ         1,463.3      (538.3)     140.2
FAIR ISAAC CORP   FRI QT         1,463.3      (538.3)     140.2
FAIR ISAAC CORP   FICO1* MM      1,463.3      (538.3)     140.2
FAIR ISAAC CORP   FICOEUR EZ     1,463.3      (538.3)     140.2
FAIR ISAAC CORP   FICOEUR EU     1,463.3      (538.3)     140.2
FARADAY FUTURE I  FFIE US          229.9        (9.4)      (2.4)
FERRELLGAS PAR-B  FGPRB US       1,776.6      (196.4)     262.4
FERRELLGAS-LP     FGPR US        1,776.6      (196.4)     262.4
FLUENCE ENERGY I  FLNC US          717.7       (56.2)    (110.0)
FOREST ROAD AC-A  FRXB US          351.3       (26.2)       0.9
FOREST ROAD ACQ   FRXB/U US        351.3       (26.2)       0.9
GAMES & ESPORTS   GEEXU US           0.6        (0.0)      (0.5)
GAMES & ESPORTS   GEEX US            0.6        (0.0)      (0.5)
GCM GROSVENOR-A   GCMG US          512.9      (110.2)     174.7
GLOBAL CLEAN ENE  GCEH US          352.9       (53.4)     (50.1)
GLOBAL SPAC -SUB  GLSPT US         169.8       (11.0)      (5.4)
GLOBAL SPAC PART  GLSPU US         169.8       (11.0)      (5.4)
GLOBAL TECHNOL-A  GTAC US            1.3        (0.1)      (0.6)
GLOBAL TECHNOLOG  GTACU US           1.3        (0.1)      (0.6)
GOGO INC          GOGO US          443.2      (560.2)      20.1
GOGO INC          G0G GR           443.2      (560.2)      20.1
GOGO INC          GOGOEUR EU       443.2      (560.2)      20.1
GOGO INC          G0G TH           443.2      (560.2)      20.1
GOGO INC          G0G QT           443.2      (560.2)      20.1
GOGO INC          G0G GZ           443.2      (560.2)      20.1
GOGREEN INVESTME  GOGN/U US          0.3        (0.1)      (0.3)
GOGREEN INVESTME  GOGN US            0.3        (0.1)      (0.3)
GOLDEN NUGGET ON  GNOG US          289.0       (45.4)     106.9
GOLDEN NUGGET ON  LCA2EUR EU       289.0       (45.4)     106.9
GOLDEN NUGGET ON  5ZU TH           289.0       (45.4)     106.9
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  GSHD US          247.1       (75.7)      16.8
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  2OX GR           247.1       (75.7)      16.8
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  GSHDEUR EU       247.1       (75.7)      16.8
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  2OX TH           247.1       (75.7)      16.8
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  2OX QT           247.1       (75.7)      16.8
GORES HOLD VII-A  GSEV US          551.9       515.7      (15.0)
GORES HOLDINGS V  GSEVU US         551.9       515.7      (15.0)
GORES TECH-B      GTPB US          461.7       425.9      (18.1)
GORES TECHNOLOGY  GTPBU US         461.7       425.9      (18.1)
GRAPHITE BIO INC  GRPH US          416.2       400.1      390.0
GREEN VISOR FI-A  GVCI US            0.7        (0.1)      (0.8)
GREEN VISOR FINA  GVCIU US           0.7        (0.1)      (0.8)
GREENSKY INC-A    GSKY US        1,405.0       (74.5)     668.4
GULFPORT ENERGY   GPOR US        2,088.2        49.0     (836.2)
GULFPORT ENERGY   G2U0 GR        2,088.2        49.0     (836.2)
H&R BLOCK - BDR   H1RB34 BZ      3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB TH         3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB US         3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB GR         3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRBEUR EZ      3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB QT         3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRBEUR EU      3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB GZ         3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB-RM RM      3,100.1      (372.7)      68.2
HAGERTY INC-A     HGTY US          117.4       102.3        1.1
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLF US         2,853.0    (1,333.4)     488.4
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO GR         2,853.0    (1,333.4)     488.4
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO GZ         2,853.0    (1,333.4)     488.4
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO TH         2,853.0    (1,333.4)     488.4
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFEUR EZ      2,853.0    (1,333.4)     488.4
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFEUR EU      2,853.0    (1,333.4)     488.4
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO QT         2,853.0    (1,333.4)     488.4
HEWLETT-CEDEAR    HPQ AR        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HEWLETT-CEDEAR    HPQC AR       38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HEWLETT-CEDEAR    HPQD AR       38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HILTON WORLD-BDR  H1LT34 BZ     15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HLT US        15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HI91 TH       15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HI91 GR       15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HLT* MM       15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HLTEUR EU     15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HLTEUR EZ     15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HLTW AV       15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HI91 TE       15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HI91 QT       15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HI91 GZ       15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HILTON WORLDWIDE  HLT-RM RM     15,314.0    (1,128.0)      72.0
HORIZON GLOBAL    2H6 GR           468.3       (25.9)     115.3
HP COMPANY-BDR    HPQB34 BZ     38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQ TE        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQ US        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            7HP TH        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            7HP GR        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQ* MM       38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQ CI        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQEUR EU     38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            7HP GZ        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD SW     38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQEUR EZ     38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQ AV        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQ SW        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            7HP QT        38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HP INC            HPQ-RM RM     38,610.0    (1,650.0)  (6,926.0)
HPX CORP          HPX US           253.9       (21.3)       0.4
HPX CORP          HPX/U US         253.9       (21.3)       0.4
IMMUNITYBIO INC   NK1EUR EU        214.4      (189.9)      29.0
IMMUNITYBIO INC   26CA GZ          214.4      (189.9)      29.0
IMMUNITYBIO INC   NK1EUR EZ        214.4      (189.9)      29.0
IMMUNITYBIO INC   IBRX US          214.4      (189.9)      29.0
IMMUNITYBIO INC   26CA GR          214.4      (189.9)      29.0
IMMUNITYBIO INC   26CA TH          214.4      (189.9)      29.0
IMMUNITYBIO INC   26CA QT          214.4      (189.9)      29.0
IMPINJ INC        PI US            315.5       (11.1)     220.3
IMPINJ INC        27J GZ           315.5       (11.1)     220.3
IMPINJ INC        27J QT           315.5       (11.1)     220.3
IMPINJ INC        27J TH           315.5       (11.1)     220.3
IMPINJ INC        27J GR           315.5       (11.1)     220.3
IMPINJ INC        PIEUR EU         315.5       (11.1)     220.3
IMPINJ INC        PIEUR EZ         315.5       (11.1)     220.3
INFINITE AC-CL A  NFNT US            0.4        (0.1)      (0.5)
INFINITE ACQUISI  NFNT/U US          0.4        (0.1)      (0.5)
INSEEGO CORP      INO TH           220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSEEGO CORP      INO QT           220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSEEGO CORP      INSG US          220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSEEGO CORP      INO GR           220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSEEGO CORP      INSGEUR EU       220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSEEGO CORP      INSGEUR EZ       220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSEEGO CORP      INO GZ           220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSEEGO CORP      INSG-RM RM       220.5       (15.3)      61.2
INSPERITY INC     NSP US         1,753.1        (1.8)     116.3
INSPERITY INC     ASF GR         1,753.1        (1.8)     116.3
INSPIRED ENTERTA  4U8 GR           303.8      (120.9)      14.7
INSPIRED ENTERTA  INSEEUR EU       303.8      (120.9)      14.7
INSPIRED ENTERTA  INSE US          303.8      (120.9)      14.7
INSTADOSE PHARMA  INSD US            -          (0.1)      (0.1)
INTERCEPT PHARMA  I4P TH           523.1      (156.0)     352.5
INTERCEPT PHARMA  ICPT US          523.1      (156.0)     352.5
INTERCEPT PHARMA  I4P GR           523.1      (156.0)     352.5
INTERCEPT PHARMA  ICPT* MM         523.1      (156.0)     352.5
INTERCEPT PHARMA  I4P GZ           523.1      (156.0)     352.5
J. JILL INC       JILL US          466.2       (48.9)     (20.2)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GR         1,750.1      (817.9)    (160.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK US        1,750.1      (817.9)    (160.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GZ         1,750.1      (817.9)    (160.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX QT         1,750.1      (817.9)    (160.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK1EUR EZ    1,750.1      (817.9)    (160.1)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK1EUR EU    1,750.1      (817.9)    (160.1)
JUNIPER II COR-A  JUN US            12.5        (0.0)      (0.4)
JUNIPER II CORP   JUN/U US          12.5        (0.0)      (0.4)
KARYOPHARM THERA  KPTI US          305.3       (79.7)     258.1
KARYOPHARM THERA  25K GR           305.3       (79.7)     258.1
KARYOPHARM THERA  25K TH           305.3       (79.7)     258.1
KARYOPHARM THERA  25K QT           305.3       (79.7)     258.1
KARYOPHARM THERA  25K GZ           305.3       (79.7)     258.1
KARYOPHARM THERA  KPTIEUR EU       305.3       (79.7)     258.1
KIMBELL TIGER AC  TGR/U US           0.6        (0.3)      (0.3)
KL ACQUISI-CLS A  KLAQ US          288.6       267.7        0.7
KL ACQUISITION C  KLAQU US         288.6       267.7        0.7
KNOWBE4 INC-A     KNBE US          463.9       172.1      137.2
L BRANDS INC-BDR  B1BW34 BZ      6,031.0    (1,675.0)   1,550.0
LDH GROWTH C-A    LDHA US          232.6       216.7        2.1
LDH GROWTH CORP   LDHAU US         232.6       216.7        2.1
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI GR         2,171.9      (269.0)     348.3
LENNOX INTL INC   LII US         2,171.9      (269.0)     348.3
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI TH         2,171.9      (269.0)     348.3
LENNOX INTL INC   LII* MM        2,171.9      (269.0)     348.3
LENNOX INTL INC   LII1EUR EU     2,171.9      (269.0)     348.3
LESLIE'S INC      LESL US          811.3      (381.3)     121.3
LESLIE'S INC      LE3 GR           811.3      (381.3)     121.3
LESLIE'S INC      LESLEUR EU       811.3      (381.3)     121.3
LESLIE'S INC      LE3 TH           811.3      (381.3)     121.3
LESLIE'S INC      LE3 QT           811.3      (381.3)     121.3
LIFESPEAK INC     LSPK CN           83.9        54.0       67.5
LIFESPEAK INC     81F GR            83.9        54.0       67.5
LIFESPEAK INC     LSPKEUR EU        83.9        54.0       67.5
LION ELECTRIC CO  LEV US           551.0       332.8      386.7
LION ELECTRIC CO  LEV CN           551.0       332.8      386.7
LION ELECTRIC CO  LEVEUR EU        551.0       332.8      386.7
LION ELECTRIC CO  70U TH           551.0       332.8      386.7
LION ELECTRIC CO  70U QT           551.0       332.8      386.7
LION ELECTRIC CO  70U GR           551.0       332.8      386.7
LOWE'S COS INC    LWE TH        49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LWE GZ        49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LOW* MM       49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LWE GR        49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LOW US        49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LOWE AV       49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LOWEUR EZ     49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LWE QT        49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LOWEUR EU     49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LWE TE        49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS INC    LOW-RM RM     49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
LOWE'S COS-BDR    LOWC34 BZ     49,400.0    (1,576.0)   4,015.0
MADISON SQUARE G  MSG1EUR EU     1,349.4      (209.6)    (233.2)
MADISON SQUARE G  MS8 GR         1,349.4      (209.6)    (233.2)
MADISON SQUARE G  MSGS US        1,349.4      (209.6)    (233.2)
MADISON SQUARE G  MS8 TH         1,349.4      (209.6)    (233.2)
MADISON SQUARE G  MS8 QT         1,349.4      (209.6)    (233.2)
MADISON SQUARE G  MS8 GZ         1,349.4      (209.6)    (233.2)
MAGNET FORENSICS  MAGT CN          148.9        86.7       82.3
MAGNET FORENSICS  MAGTEUR EU       148.9        86.7       82.3
MAGNET FORENSICS  91T GR           148.9        86.7       82.3
MAGNET FORENSICS  MAGTF US         148.9        86.7       82.3
MANNKIND CORP     NNFN TH          238.2      (184.7)     109.2
MANNKIND CORP     MNKD US          238.2      (184.7)     109.2
MANNKIND CORP     NNFN GR          238.2      (184.7)     109.2
MANNKIND CORP     MNKDEUR EU       238.2      (184.7)     109.2
MANNKIND CORP     NNFN QT          238.2      (184.7)     109.2
MANNKIND CORP     NNFN GZ          238.2      (184.7)     109.2
MARKETWISE INC    MKTW US          403.4      (441.9)    (198.5)
MASON INDUS-CL A  MIT US           502.3       (33.8)       1.7
MASON INDUSTRIAL  MIT/U US         502.3       (33.8)       1.7
MATCH GROUP -BDR  M1TC34 BZ      5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   MTCH US        5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   MTCH1* MM      5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   4MGN TH        5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   4MGN GR        5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   4MGN QT        5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   MTC2 AV        5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   4MGN GZ        5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MATCH GROUP INC   MTCH-RM RM     5,063.3      (194.6)      50.0
MBIA INC          MBJ TH         4,816.0      (157.0)       -
MBIA INC          MBI US         4,816.0      (157.0)       -
MBIA INC          MBJ GR         4,816.0      (157.0)       -
MBIA INC          MBI1EUR EU     4,816.0      (157.0)       -
MBIA INC          MBJ QT         4,816.0      (157.0)       -
MBIA INC          MBJ GZ         4,816.0      (157.0)       -
MCAFEE CORP - A   MCFE US        3,484.0    (1,765.0)    (398.0)
MCAFEE CORP - A   MC7 GR         3,484.0    (1,765.0)    (398.0)
MCAFEE CORP - A   MCFEEUR EU     3,484.0    (1,765.0)    (398.0)
MCAFEE CORP - A   MC7 TH         3,484.0    (1,765.0)    (398.0)
MCDONALD'S CORP   TCXMCD AU     53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS - BDR   MCDC34 BZ     53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO TH        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD US        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD SW        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GR        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD* MM       53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD TE        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD CI        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDEUR EU     53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GZ        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD AV        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD SW     53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDEUR EZ     53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    0R16 LN       53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO QT        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD-RM RM     53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDCL CI      53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS-CEDEAR  MCD AR        53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS-CEDEAR  MCDC AR       53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCDONALDS-CEDEAR  MCDD AR       53,606.4    (4,601.0)   3,128.5
MCKESSON CORP     MCK US        63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK* MM       63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK TH        63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK GZ        63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK GR        63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK1EUR EZ    63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK1EUR EU    63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK QT        63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON CORP     MCK-RM RM     63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MCKESSON-BDR      M1CK34 BZ     63,708.0      (787.0)    (954.0)
MEDIAALPHA INC-A  MAX US           245.5       (72.9)      46.6
MELI KASZEK PI-A  MEKA US           10.7       (55.9)      (6.6)
MEWCOURT ACQUISI  NCACU US           0.2        (0.1)      (0.3)
MINERVA SURGICAL  UTRS US           85.2      (122.1)     (10.9)
MINORITY EQUAL-A  MEOA US          129.5       (18.8)       0.8
MINORITY EQUALIT  MEOAU US         129.5       (18.8)       0.8
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N GR        4,483.9      (185.9)      18.3
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N TH        4,483.9      (185.9)      18.3
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIEUR EU      4,483.9      (185.9)      18.3
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGI US         4,483.9      (185.9)      18.3
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIEUR EZ      4,483.9      (185.9)      18.3
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N QT        4,483.9      (185.9)      18.3
MOTOROLA SOL-BDR  M1SI34 BZ     12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOL-CED  MSI AR        12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GR       12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MOT TE        12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI US        12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA TH       12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1EUR EU    12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GZ       12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1EUR EZ    12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MOSI AV       12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA QT       12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI-RM RM     12,189.0       (23.0)   1,349.0
MSCI INC          MSCI US        5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          3HM GR         5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          3HM QT         5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          3HM SW         5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          3HM GZ         5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          MSCIEUR EZ     5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          MSCI* MM       5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          3HM TH         5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          MSCI AV        5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC          MSCI-RM RM     5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MSCI INC-BDR      M1SC34 BZ      5,506.7      (163.5)     892.5
MUDRICK CAP ACQ   MUDSU US         321.3       (33.8)      (4.7)
MUDRICK CAPITA-A  MUDS US          321.3       (33.8)      (4.7)
NATHANS FAMOUS    NFA GR           114.5       (55.3)      48.2
NATHANS FAMOUS    NATH US          114.5       (55.3)      48.2
NATHANS FAMOUS    NATHEUR EU       114.5       (55.3)      48.2
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMI US          820.1      (385.2)      92.2
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMIEUR EU       820.1      (385.2)      92.2
NEIGHBOURLY PHAR  NBLY CN          514.2       318.1       84.8
NEW ENG RLTY-LP   NEN US           288.9       (44.8)       -
NEWCOURT ACQ-A    NCAC US            0.2        (0.1)      (0.3)
NOBLE CORP        NE US          2,094.8     1,366.7      179.4
NOBLE CORP        85V0 GR        2,094.8     1,366.7      179.4
NOBLE CORP        NE1EUR EU      2,094.8     1,366.7      179.4
NOBLE CORP        85V0 QT        2,094.8     1,366.7      179.4
NOBLE CORP        NE1EUR EZ      2,094.8     1,366.7      179.4
NOBLE ROCK ACQ-A  NRAC US          243.1       224.7        1.3
NOBLE ROCK ACQUI  NRACU US         243.1       224.7        1.3
NORTHERN OIL AND  4LT1 GR        1,244.1      (157.7)    (187.6)
NORTHERN OIL AND  NOG US         1,244.1      (157.7)    (187.6)
NORTHERN OIL AND  NOG1EUR EU     1,244.1      (157.7)    (187.6)
NORTHERN OIL AND  4LT1 TH        1,244.1      (157.7)    (187.6)
NORTHERN OIL AND  4LT1 GZ        1,244.1      (157.7)    (187.6)
NORTONLIFEL- BDR  S1YM34 BZ      6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  NLOK US        6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYM TH         6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYM GR         6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYMC TE        6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYMCEUR EU     6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYM GZ         6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYMC AV        6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  NLOK* MM       6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYMCEUR EZ     6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  SYM QT         6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NORTONLIFELOCK I  NLOK-RM RM     6,873.0       (98.0)    (726.0)
NUTANIX INC - A   0NU GZ         2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
NUTANIX INC - A   0NU GR         2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
NUTANIX INC - A   NTNXEUR EU     2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
NUTANIX INC - A   0NU TH         2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
NUTANIX INC - A   0NU QT         2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
NUTANIX INC - A   NTNXEUR EZ     2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
NUTANIX INC - A   NTNX US        2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
NUTANIX INC - A   NTNX-RM RM     2,254.6      (698.7)     647.6
O'REILLY AUT-BDR  ORLY34 BZ     11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  OM6 TH        11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  ORLYEUR EU    11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  OM6 GZ        11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  ORLY AV       11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  OM6 GR        11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  ORLY US       11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  ORLYEUR EZ    11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  ORLY* MM      11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  OM6 QT        11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
O'REILLY AUTOMOT  ORLY-RM RM    11,718.7       (66.4)  (1,370.4)
OMEROS CORP       OMER US          123.4      (262.7)      48.5
OMEROS CORP       3O8 GR           123.4      (262.7)      48.5
OMEROS CORP       3O8 QT           123.4      (262.7)      48.5
OMEROS CORP       3O8 TH           123.4      (262.7)      48.5
OMEROS CORP       OMEREUR EU       123.4      (262.7)      48.5
OMEROS CORP       3O8 GZ           123.4      (262.7)      48.5
OPTIVA INC        OPT CN            95.5       (34.3)      27.5
OPY ACQUISIT-A    OHAA US            0.2        (0.0)      (0.2)
OPY ACQUISITION   OHAAU US           0.2        (0.0)      (0.2)
ORACLE BDR        ORCL34 BZ    106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CO-CEDEAR  ORCLC AR     106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CO-CEDEAR  ORCL AR      106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CO-CEDEAR  ORCLD AR     106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCL* MM     106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCL US      106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORC GR       106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORC TH       106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCL TE      106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCL CI      106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORC GZ       106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       0R1Z LN      106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCL AV      106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCLUSD SW   106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCLEUR EZ   106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCL SW      106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCLEUR EU   106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORC QT       106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCLCL CI    106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP       ORCL-RM RM   106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORACLE CORP TRAC  TCXORC AU    106,897.0    (9,658.0)  12,197.0
ORGANON & CO      OGN US        11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
ORGANON & CO      7XP TH        11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
ORGANON & CO      OGN-WEUR EU   11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
ORGANON & CO      OGN* MM       11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
ORGANON & CO      7XP GR        11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
ORGANON & CO      7XP GZ        11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
ORGANON & CO      7XP QT        11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
ORGANON & CO      OGN-RM RM     11,335.0    (1,618.0)   1,200.0
OTIS WORLDWI      OTIS US       12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      4PG GR        12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      OTISEUR EZ    12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      OTISEUR EU    12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      4PG GZ        12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      OTIS* MM      12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      4PG TH        12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      4PG QT        12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      OTIS AV       12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI      OTIS-RM RM    12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
OTIS WORLDWI-BDR  O1TI34 BZ     12,279.0    (2,984.0)   2,014.0
PANAMERA HOLDING  PHCI US            0.0        (0.1)      (0.1)
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZAEUR EU       890.0      (129.5)     (46.4)
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 GR           890.0      (129.5)     (46.4)
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZA US          890.0      (129.5)     (46.4)
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 GZ           890.0      (129.5)     (46.4)
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 TH           890.0      (129.5)     (46.4)
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 QT           890.0      (129.5)     (46.4)
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZAEUR EZ       890.0      (129.5)     (46.4)
PARATEK PHARMACE  PRTK US          182.3      (105.0)     123.9
PARATEK PHARMACE  N4CN GR          182.3      (105.0)     123.9
PARATEK PHARMACE  N4CN TH          182.3      (105.0)     123.9
PARATEK PHARMACE  N4CN GZ          182.3      (105.0)     123.9
PEPPERLIME HEA-A  PEPL US            4.8        (0.0)      (0.6)
PEPPERLIME HEALT  PEPLU US           4.8        (0.0)      (0.6)
PET VALU HOLDING  PET CN           542.1      (152.2)      19.5
PHILIP MORRI-BDR  PHMO34 BZ     41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GR        41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM US         41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EU     41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 TE        41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 TH        41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI SW        41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EU     41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMIZ EB       41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMIZ IX       41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GZ        41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  0M8V LN       41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMOR AV       41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EZ     41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EZ     41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM* MM        41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 QT        41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM-RM RM      41,290.0    (8,208.0)  (1,538.0)
PLANET FITNESS I  P2LN34 BZ      1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1EUR EU    1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL QT         1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1EUR EZ    1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT US        1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL TH         1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL GR         1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL GZ         1,949.7      (658.4)     468.9
POTBELLY CORP     PBPB US          256.8        (0.3)     (44.6)
PROJECT ENERGY R  PEGRU US           0.7        (0.0)      (0.7)
PROJECT ENERGY R  PEGR US            0.7        (0.0)      (0.7)
RADIUS HEALTH IN  RDUS US          186.2      (242.5)      87.4
RADIUS HEALTH IN  1R8 TH           186.2      (242.5)      87.4
RADIUS HEALTH IN  1R8 QT           186.2      (242.5)      87.4
RADIUS HEALTH IN  RDUSEUR EU       186.2      (242.5)      87.4
RADIUS HEALTH IN  1R8 GR           186.2      (242.5)      87.4
RAPID7 INC        RPDEUR EU      1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RAPID7 INC        R7D SW         1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RAPID7 INC        RPD US         1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RAPID7 INC        R7D GR         1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RAPID7 INC        R7D TH         1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RAPID7 INC        RPD* MM        1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RAPID7 INC        R7D GZ         1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RAPID7 INC        R7D QT         1,296.0      (126.0)     (35.9)
RCF ACQUISIT-A    RCFA US            0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
RCF ACQUISIT-A    GY0 GR             0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
RCF ACQUISIT-A    RCFAEUR EU         0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
RCF ACQUISITION   RCFA/U US          0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
REAL GOOD FOOD C  RGF US            43.8       (52.3)     (40.0)
RENT THE RUNWA-A  RENT US          478.4       104.9      220.3
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 GR        2,448.2    (2,066.3)     248.3
REVLON INC-A      REV US         2,448.2    (2,066.3)     248.3
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 TH        2,448.2    (2,066.3)     248.3
REVLON INC-A      REVEUR EU      2,448.2    (2,066.3)     248.3
REVLON INC-A      REV* MM        2,448.2    (2,066.3)     248.3
RIMINI STREET IN  RMNI US          256.7      (160.2)     (64.2)
RIMINI STREET IN  0QH GR           256.7      (160.2)     (64.2)
RIMINI STREET IN  RMNIEUR EU       256.7      (160.2)     (64.2)
RIMINI STREET IN  0QH QT           256.7      (160.2)     (64.2)
ROSE HILL ACQU-A  ROSE US            0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
ROSE HILL ACQUIS  ROSEU US           0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN TH        3,093.4      (223.6)     502.9
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN GR        3,093.4      (223.6)     502.9
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRD US         3,093.4      (223.6)     502.9
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDEUR EU      3,093.4      (223.6)     502.9
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN GZ        3,093.4      (223.6)     502.9
RYMAN HOSPITALIT  4RH GR         3,537.8       (27.1)      (6.8)
RYMAN HOSPITALIT  RHP US         3,537.8       (27.1)      (6.8)
RYMAN HOSPITALIT  RHPEUR EU      3,537.8       (27.1)      (6.8)
RYMAN HOSPITALIT  4RH TH         3,537.8       (27.1)      (6.8)
RYMAN HOSPITALIT  4RH QT         3,537.8       (27.1)      (6.8)
SABRE CORP        SABR US        5,442.9      (355.1)     830.9
SABRE CORP        19S GR         5,442.9      (355.1)     830.9
SABRE CORP        19S TH         5,442.9      (355.1)     830.9
SABRE CORP        SABREUR EU     5,442.9      (355.1)     830.9
SABRE CORP        19S QT         5,442.9      (355.1)     830.9
SABRE CORP        SABREUR EZ     5,442.9      (355.1)     830.9
SABRE CORP        19S GZ         5,442.9      (355.1)     830.9
SBA COMM CORP     4SB TH         9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GR         9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMM CORP     SBAC US        9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GZ         9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMM CORP     SBACEUR EZ     9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMM CORP     4SB QT         9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMM CORP     SBACEUR EU     9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMM CORP     SBAC* MM       9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SBA COMMUN - BDR  S1BA34 BZ      9,668.1    (4,943.1)    (188.2)
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  SGMS US        7,850.0    (2,191.0)   1,077.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW GR         7,850.0    (2,191.0)   1,077.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW TH         7,850.0    (2,191.0)   1,077.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW GZ         7,850.0    (2,191.0)   1,077.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW QT         7,850.0    (2,191.0)   1,077.0
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  SGMS1EUR EU    7,850.0    (2,191.0)   1,077.0
SCULPTOR ACQUI-A  SCUA US            0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
SCULPTOR ACQUISI  SCUA/U US          0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
SHARECARE INC     SHCR US          783.7       608.5      336.5
SHARECARE INC     8DJ0 GR          783.7       608.5      336.5
SHARECARE INC     SHCREUR EU       783.7       608.5      336.5
SHELL MIDSTREAM   SHLX US        2,329.0      (469.0)     352.0
SHOALS TECHNOL-A  SHLS US          382.8       (11.1)      73.1
SIDUS SPACE INC   SIDU US            3.8        (1.6)       0.6
SINCLAIR BROAD-A  SBGI US       12,845.0    (1,366.0)   1,652.0
SINCLAIR BROAD-A  SBTA GR       12,845.0    (1,366.0)   1,652.0
SINCLAIR BROAD-A  SBGIEUR EU    12,845.0    (1,366.0)   1,652.0
SINCLAIR BROAD-A  SBTA GZ       12,845.0    (1,366.0)   1,652.0
SINCLAIR BROAD-A  SBGIEUR EZ    12,845.0    (1,366.0)   1,652.0
SINCLAIR BROAD-A  SBTA TH       12,845.0    (1,366.0)   1,652.0
SINCLAIR BROAD-A  SBTA QT       12,845.0    (1,366.0)   1,652.0
SIRIUS XM HO-BDR  SRXM34 BZ     10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI US       10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GR        10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO TH        10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIEUR EU    10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GZ        10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI AV       10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIEUR EZ    10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO QT        10,274.0    (2,625.0)  (1,800.0)
SIRNAOMICS LTD    2257 HK          110.2       (94.2)      11.0
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE GR         3,054.9      (452.1)      99.8
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIX US         3,054.9      (452.1)      99.8
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIXEUR EU      3,054.9      (452.1)      99.8
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE QT         3,054.9      (452.1)      99.8
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE TH         3,054.9      (452.1)      99.8
SKYWATER TECHNOL  SKYT US          271.7        85.1       23.1
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SNBR US          883.6      (440.1)    (695.6)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SL2 GR           883.6      (440.1)    (695.6)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SNBREUR EU       883.6      (440.1)    (695.6)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SL2 TH           883.6      (440.1)    (695.6)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SL2 QT           883.6      (440.1)    (695.6)
SLEEP NUMBER COR  SL2 GZ           883.6      (440.1)    (695.6)
SMILEDIRECTCLUB   SDC* MM          886.1       (45.7)     387.3
SOFTCHOICE CORP   SFTC CN          513.3        45.8      (36.6)
SOFTCHOICE CORP   90Q GR           513.3        45.8      (36.6)
SOFTCHOICE CORP   SFTCEUR EU       513.3        45.8      (36.6)
SOFTCHOICE CORP   90Q GZ           513.3        45.8      (36.6)
SONIDA SENIOR LI  SNDA US          674.2      (153.6)    (186.5)
SONIDA SENIOR LI  13C0 GR          674.2      (153.6)    (186.5)
SONIDA SENIOR LI  CSU2EUR EU       674.2      (153.6)    (186.5)
SONIDA SENIOR LI  13C0 GZ          674.2      (153.6)    (186.5)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SW5 TH         9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SW5 GR         9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SWN US         9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SWN1EUR EZ     9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SW5 QT         9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SWN1EUR EU     9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SW5 GZ         9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SOUTHWESTRN ENGY  SWN-RM RM      9,241.0      (286.0)  (3,260.0)
SPRAGUE RESOURCE  SRLP US        1,231.6      (101.9)    (139.0)
SQL TECHNOLOGIES  SKYX US            7.0       (22.9)     (19.6)
SQUARESPACE -BDR  S2QS34 BZ        905.8       (15.9)     (41.3)
SQUARESPACE IN-A  SQSP US          905.8       (15.9)     (41.3)
SQUARESPACE IN-A  8DT GR           905.8       (15.9)     (41.3)
SQUARESPACE IN-A  SQSPEUR EU       905.8       (15.9)     (41.3)
SQUARESPACE IN-A  8DT GZ           905.8       (15.9)     (41.3)
SQUARESPACE IN-A  8DT TH           905.8       (15.9)     (41.3)
SQUARESPACE IN-A  8DT QT           905.8       (15.9)     (41.3)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX* MM      28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB GR        28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB TH        28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX CI       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB GZ        28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX AV       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX TE       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXEUR EU    28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX IM       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX US       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXUSD SW    28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXEUR EZ    28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    0QZH LI       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX PE       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX SW       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SRB QT        28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX-RM RM    28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUXCL CI     28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS CORP    SBUX_KZ KZ    28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS-BDR     SBUB34 BZ     28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS-CEDEAR  SBUXD AR      28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
STARBUCKS-CEDEAR  SBUX AR       28,833.9    (8,450.3)  (1,666.0)
TAILWIND INTERNA  TWNI/U US        347.0       (22.0)       1.1
TAILWIND INTERNA  TWNI US          347.0       (22.0)       1.1
TALON 1 ACQUIS-A  TOAC US            0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
TALON 1 ACQUISIT  TOACU US           0.4        (0.0)      (0.4)
TASTEMAKER ACQ-A  TMKR US          279.5       254.3        0.4
TASTEMAKER ACQUI  TMKRU US         279.5       254.3        0.4
THUNDER BRIDGE C  TBCPU US         414.9       394.0       (5.6)
THUNDER BRIDGE-A  TBCP US          414.9       394.0       (5.6)
TKB CRITICAL T-A  USCT US            0.5        (0.0)      (0.5)
TKB CRITICAL TEC  USCTU US           0.5        (0.0)      (0.5)
TORRID HOLDINGS   CURV US          636.3      (214.6)     (31.5)
TRANSAT A.T.      TRZ CN         1,897.7      (315.1)      89.7
TRANSAT A.T.      TRZBF US       1,897.7      (315.1)      89.7
TRANSDIGM - BDR   T1DG34 BZ     19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG US        19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D GR        19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D TH        19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG* MM       19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D QT        19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGEUR EU     19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGEUR EZ     19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG-RM RM     19,242.0    (2,626.0)   5,593.0
TRANSPHORM INC    TGAN US           14.3       (19.5)     (11.7)
TRAVEL + LEISURE  WD5A GR        6,601.0      (849.0)     658.0
TRAVEL + LEISURE  TNL US         6,601.0      (849.0)     658.0
TRAVEL + LEISURE  WD5A TH        6,601.0      (849.0)     658.0
TRAVEL + LEISURE  0M1K LI        6,601.0      (849.0)     658.0
TRAVEL + LEISURE  WD5A QT        6,601.0      (849.0)     658.0
TRAVEL + LEISURE  WYNEUR EU      6,601.0      (849.0)     658.0
TRAVEL + LEISURE  WD5A GZ        6,601.0      (849.0)     658.0
TRISTAR ACQUISIT  TRIS/U US          0.7        (0.1)      (0.8)
TRISTAR ACQUISIT  TRIS US            0.7        (0.1)      (0.8)
TRIUMPH GROUP     TG7 GR         1,752.5      (812.0)     365.1
TRIUMPH GROUP     TGI US         1,752.5      (812.0)     365.1
TRIUMPH GROUP     TG7 TH         1,752.5      (812.0)     365.1
TRIUMPH GROUP     TGIEUR EU      1,752.5      (812.0)     365.1
TRIUMPH GROUP     TG7 GZ         1,752.5      (812.0)     365.1
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GR         1,207.7      (223.3)    (461.6)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP US         1,207.7      (223.3)    (461.6)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GZ         1,207.7      (223.3)    (461.6)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP TH         1,207.7      (223.3)    (461.6)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1EUR EU     1,207.7      (223.3)    (461.6)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1EUR EZ     1,207.7      (223.3)    (461.6)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP QT         1,207.7      (223.3)    (461.6)
UBIQUITI INC      UI US            890.8        (4.2)     418.7
UBIQUITI INC      3UB GR           890.8        (4.2)     418.7
UBIQUITI INC      UBNTEUR EU       890.8        (4.2)     418.7
UBIQUITI INC      3UB TH           890.8        (4.2)     418.7
UNISYS CORP       USY1 TH        2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GR        2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       UIS US         2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       UIS1 SW        2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EU      2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EU      2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GZ        2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       USY1 QT        2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EZ      2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EZ      2,321.4      (250.1)     463.6
UNITI GROUP INC   UNIT US        4,784.3    (2,118.2)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC GR         4,784.3    (2,118.2)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC TH         4,784.3    (2,118.2)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC GZ         4,784.3    (2,118.2)       -
VAXXINITY INC-A   VAXX US          134.9        93.6       73.4
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR US         1,536.0      (573.1)     470.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR GR         1,536.0      (573.1)     470.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGREUR EU      1,536.0      (573.1)     470.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGREUR EZ      1,536.0      (573.1)     470.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR TH         1,536.0      (573.1)     470.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR QT         1,536.0      (573.1)     470.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR GZ         1,536.0      (573.1)     470.3
VENTYX BIOSCIENC  VTYX US          148.7       136.9      133.9
VERA THERAPEUTIC  VERA US           91.2        85.5       85.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS TH         1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSN US        1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS GR         1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSNEUR EU     1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS GZ         1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSN* MM       1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSNEUR EZ     1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS QT         1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC      VRSN-RM RM     1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN INC-BDR  VRSN34 BZ      1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VERISIGN-CEDEAR   VRSN AR        1,983.8    (1,260.5)     194.7
VINCO VENTURES I  BBIG US          336.9      (172.0)     137.5
VIVINT SMART HOM  VVNT US        2,916.4    (1,709.5)    (508.5)
W&T OFFSHORE INC  UWV GR         1,243.3      (296.9)       2.8
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI1EUR EU     1,243.3      (296.9)       2.8
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI US         1,243.3      (296.9)       2.8
W&T OFFSHORE INC  UWV SW         1,243.3      (296.9)       2.8
W&T OFFSHORE INC  UWV TH         1,243.3      (296.9)       2.8
W&T OFFSHORE INC  UWV GZ         1,243.3      (296.9)       2.8
WALDENCAST ACQ-A  WALD US          345.7       309.6        0.4
WALDENCAST ACQUI  WALDU US         345.7       309.6        0.4
WARBURG PINCUS C  WPCA/U US        285.7       (20.6)       1.5
WARBURG PINCUS-A  WPCA US          285.7       (20.6)       1.5
WAVERLEY CAPIT-A  WAVC US          217.2        (5.2)       2.3
WAVERLEY CAPITAL  WAVC/U US        217.2        (5.2)       2.3
WAYFAIR INC- A    W US           4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    W* MM          4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF QT         4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF GZ         4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    WEUR EZ        4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF GR         4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF TH         4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- A    WEUR EU        4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WAYFAIR INC- BDR  W2YF34 BZ      4,466.2    (1,530.1)     924.7
WEBER INC - A     WEBR US        1,551.0      (121.3)     147.9
WINGSTOP INC      WING1EUR EU      260.4      (314.1)      29.5
WINGSTOP INC      WING US          260.4      (314.1)      29.5
WINGSTOP INC      EWG GR           260.4      (314.1)      29.5
WINGSTOP INC      EWG GZ           260.4      (314.1)      29.5
WINMARK CORP      WINA US           55.0       (12.8)      33.6
WINMARK CORP      GBZ GR            55.0       (12.8)      33.6
WORLDWIDE WEBB A  WWACU US           0.7        (0.0)      (0.7)
WORLDWIDE WEBB-A  WWAC US            0.7        (0.0)      (0.7)
WW INTERNATIONAL  WW US          1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WW6 GR         1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WW6 TH         1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WW6 SW         1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WW6 GZ         1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WTWEUR EZ      1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WTW AV         1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WTWEUR EU      1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WW6 QT         1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WW INTERNATIONAL  WW-RM RM       1,467.9      (491.4)      53.5
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYR GR        12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYR TH        12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNN* MM      12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNN US       12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNNEUR EU    12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYR GZ        12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNNEUR EZ    12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYR QT        12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS LTD  WYNN-RM RM    12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
WYNN RESORTS-BDR  W1YN34 BZ     12,607.7      (592.6)   1,569.3
XILIO THERAPEUTI  XLO US           120.7        86.4       92.7
YELLOW CORP       YEL GR         2,425.6      (363.5)     219.4
YELLOW CORP       YELL US        2,425.6      (363.5)     219.4
YELLOW CORP       YEL1 TH        2,425.6      (363.5)     219.4
YELLOW CORP       YRCWEUR EZ     2,425.6      (363.5)     219.4
YELLOW CORP       YEL QT         2,425.6      (363.5)     219.4
YELLOW CORP       YRCWEUR EU     2,425.6      (363.5)     219.4
YELLOW CORP       YEL GZ         2,425.6      (363.5)     219.4
YUM! BRANDS -BDR  YUMR34 BZ      5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR TH         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GR         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM US         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GZ         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM* MM        5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD SW      5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMEUR EZ      5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM AV         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR TE         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMEUR EU      5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR QT         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM SW         5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM-RM RM      5,966.0    (8,373.0)     117.0
ZETA GLOBAL HO-A  ZETA US          354.3        55.8       95.4



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
Randy Antoni, Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante,
Rousel Elaine Tumanda, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Psyche A. Castillon,
Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and
Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2022.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***