/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/211108.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, November 8, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 311

                            Headlines

18 IRVING STREET: Gets OK to Tap Irene Bremis as Real Estate Broker
A & G PIZZA: Wins Cash Collateral Access
ALGON CORP: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 30
ALLSPRING BUYER: Fitch Assigns Final 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
ALPHA METALLURGICAL: Posts $83.3M Net Income in Third Quarter

AMERICAN AIRLINES: Meadows Bid to Review Estimation Order Denied
ARCH RESOURCES: Moody's Alters Outlook on B2 CFR to Positive
ARUBA INVESTMENTS: Fitch Lowers LongTerm IDR to 'B'
ARUBA INVESTMENTS: Moody's Cuts CFR to B3, Alters Outlook to Stable
ARUBA INVESTMENTS: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable

AUTO-SWAGE PRODUCTS: Amends Plan to Add CT-DEEP Subordinated Claim
AUTO-SWAGE PRODUCTS: Further Fine-Tunes Plan Documents
BASIC ENERGY: Court Approves Bankruptcy Wind-Down Settlement
BCP RENAISSANCE: Fitch Affirms B+ Rating on Sr. Secured Debt
BEAR COMMUNICATIONS: Dentons Represents Creditors Committee

BEAR VALLEY RANCH: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 30
BOOZ ALLEN: Moody's Hikes Rating on Sr. Unsecured Notes From Ba2
BOSTON DONUTS: Gets Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 18
BVF FUND II: Unsecured Creditors Will Get 100% of Claims in Plan
CANACOL ENERGY: Moody's Hikes CFR & Senior Unsecured Notes to Ba3

CARVANA CO: Incurs $68 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
CAUSE TECH: Unsecureds Will Get 20% of Claims in 60 Months
CHG PPC: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
CONWAY COURT: Gets Interim Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 30
CPESAZ LIQUIDATING: Hawkins, Scott Represent CPES Claimants

CRC INVESTMENTS: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 31
CREATD INC: Gets $7.8M from Stock Offering, Warrants Exercise
CYBER LITIGATION: Court Clarifies Decision on Bar Date Notice
DCP MIDSTREAM: Fitch Rates Proposed Sr. Unsec. Notes 'BB+'
DCP MIDSTREAM: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating on New $400MM Senior Notes

DCP MIDSTREAM: S&P Assigns 'BB+' Rating on Senior Unsecured Notes
DLVAM1302 NORTH SHORE: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
DRIVEN BRANDS: S&P Assigns 'B+' ICR, Outlook Stable
DRIVEN HOLDINGS: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR & Rates New Term Loan B2
EAGLE HOSPITALITY: Court Okays Bankruptcy Plan for Creditor Vote

EDISON INT'L: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on Preferred Stock Series B
EDISON INTERNATIONAL: S&P Rates Perpetual Preferred Stock B 'BB+'
EHT US1 INC: Claims Will be Paid from Sale Proceeds
EHT US1: EHT Asset Denied Further Extension to File Appeal Notice
EMPIRE RESORTS: Fitch Assigns Final 'B+' LT IDR, Outlook Stable

ENDO INTERNATIONAL: Bankruptcy Filing One of Contingency Plans
EXPRESS GRAIN: Taps Dennis Gerrard of CR3 Partners as CRO
FENDER MUSICAL: Moody's Rates New $375MM Secured Term Loan B 'B2'
FORTRESS INVESTMENT: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
FROZEN FOODS: Seeks Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov. 19

GLAUKOM LLC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Unsecureds Will Get 100% in Prepackaged Plan
GULF COAST HEALTH: Law Firm of Russel Represent Utility Companies
GULF COAST: Asks Court to Transfer Control of 24 Nursing Homes
GVS TEXAS: Reaches Deal to Duck Appointment of Ch.11 Trustee

HARMAN PRESS: Has Deal on Cash Collateral Access Thru Jan 2022
HEALTHCARE ROYALTY: Fitch Withdraws Ratings
HELIUS MEDICAL: Receives PoNS Market Authorization in Australia
HOOT THE DOG: Wins Permission to Use Cash Collateral
HORIZON GLOBAL: Incurs $2.8 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter

HOYA MIDCO: S&P Raises ICR to 'B', on Merger with Horizon
HRNI HOLDINGS: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'B(EXP)' LongTerm IDR
HUDSON PACIFIC: S&P Assigns 'BB' Rating on New Preferred Stock
INFINERA CORP: Incurs $53.8 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
ION GEOPHYSICAL: Posts $440K Net Loss in Third Quarter

J.S. CATES: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Jan 2022
JOHNSON & JOHNSON: Seeks to Revive Strategy to Resolve Powder Suits
JONES SODA: Board OKs Chastain as Beverage Division President, COO
JONES SODA: Incurs $59K Net Loss in Third Quarter
KADMON HOLDINGS: Stockholders Approve Merger Deal With Sanofi Unit

KOPIN CORPORATION: Incurs $2.1 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
L'INC D'ALINE: Unsecured Creditors to Get $172K in 5 Years
LATAM AIRLINES: Aires Settles Dispute With Regional One, Dash
LATAM AIRLINES: Kramer Levin 2nd Update on Parent Claimants
LEGENDARY FIELD: Bankr. Court OKs Settlement of Class Claims

LTL MANAGEMENT: Talc Committee Approved Over Venue Concerns
MALLINCKRODT PLC: Can Use Chapter 11 to Duck Acthar Royalties
MALLINCKRODT PLC: Cleared by Court on $94 Mil. Ch.11 Bond Penalty
MARA DAY: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
MENUCHA ENTERPRISES: Unsecureds Will Get 22.9% of Claims in Plan

METHODIST UNIVERSITY: S&P Rates 2021 Revenue Refunding Bonds 'BB'
MID ATLANTIC PRINTERS: Taps Magee Goldstein Lasky as Legal Counsel
MIKEN OIL: Unsecureds Will Get 40% of Claims in 60 Months
MIND TECHNOLOGY: Hikes 9.00% Series A Preferred Stock Exchange Cap
MKS GROUP: Eggspectation Franchisee Seeks Chapter 11

NASHEF LLC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 18
NATURE COAST: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru March 2022
NEP/NCP HOLDCO: Moody's Rates New $210MM 1st Lien Loan Add-on 'B3'
NEP/NCP HOLDCO: S&P Rates New $210MM Incremental Term Loan 'B'
NEUTRAL POSTURE: Wins Cash Collateral Access

NEW HOPE: S&P Places 2016B Bonds 'B' Rating on Watch Negative
NOISE SOLUTIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
NORCROSS LODGING: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 10
PATH MEDICAL: Committee Taps Greenberg Traurig as Legal Counsel
PECF USS III: Revised Financing No Impact on Moody's B3 CFR

PLAYA HOTELS: Incurs $12.4 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
PWM PROPERTY: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 3
QUALITY REHABILITATION: Gets OK to Hire Shippen Pope as Accountant
R & R INDUSTRIES: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full in 60 Months
R. INVESTMENTS: Updates Unsecured Claims Pay Details; Amends Plan

R.R. DONNELLEY: Moody's Puts B2 CFR Under Review for Downgrade
RONNY'S A-LA-CARTE: Amends Executory Contract Provisions
RUBY PIPELINE: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CC' On Near-Term Default Risk
S&S HOLDINGS: Moody's Hikes CFR to B2, Outlook Remains Stable
S&S HOLDINGS: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B' on Continued Deleveraging

SCULPTOR CAPITAL: Fitch Withdraws Ratings
SENIOR HEALTHCARE: Unsecureds Will Get 49.2% of Claims in Plan
SEQUENTIAL BRANDS: Ex-CEO Shmidman Gets Jo's Jeans Brand
SEQUENTIAL BRANDS: Jessica Simpson Wins OK to Buy Back Brand
SILVER LAKES RESORT: Taps Porter & Lasiewicz as Accountant

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'BB' LT IDR to Stable
SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY: S&P Places 'BB' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
STERICYCLE INC: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
T2 BIOSYSTEMS: Issues Going-Concern Warning
TELIGENT INC: Unsecured Creditors Balk at Steep Roll-Up of Ares

TWO'S COMPANY: Taps Business Consultants as Accountant
UNITI GROUP: Posts $43.7 Million Net Income in Third Quarter
URBAN ONE: Posts $13.9 Million Net Income in Third Quarter
VINE ENERGY: Moody's Hikes Rating on Senior Unsecured Notes to B1
W.R. GRACE: Moody's Assigns B1 Rating to Senior Secured Notes

YUNHONG CTI: Closes Redemption of Equity Interest in Flexo
[*] Commercial Chapter 11 Filings Up 21.1% in October 2021
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week of November 1 to 5, 2021

                            *********

18 IRVING STREET: Gets OK to Tap Irene Bremis as Real Estate Broker
-------------------------------------------------------------------
18 Irving Street, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Massachusetts to employ Irene Bremis, a
real estate broker based in Somerville, Mass.

Ms. Bremis will market and sell the Debtor's residential real
estate located at 18 Irving St., Somerville.  She will get a
commission of 5 percent of the gross sales price.

Ms. Bremis disclosed in a court filing that her firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Irene Bremis
     120 College Ave
     120 College Ave.
     Somerville, MA 02144
     Telephone: (617) 623-2500
     Email: IBremis@LAERrealty.com

                    About 18 Irving Street LLC

Somerville, Mass.-based 18 Irving Street, LLC sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No.
21-10776) on May 27, 2021, listing as much as $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  Gina Strauss, manager and sole member,
signed the petition.  Judge Janet E. Bostwick oversees the case.
The Debtor tapped Alex R. Hess Law Group as legal counsel.


A & G PIZZA: Wins Cash Collateral Access
----------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North
Carolina, Raleigh Division, has authorized A & G Pizza, Inc. to use
cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance with the budget
through October 31, 2021, with a 10% variance.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to pay its expenses
and maintain constant cash flow.

US Foods, Inc. the Internal Revenue Service, and the North Carolina
Department of Revenue assert an interest in the Debtor's cash
collateral.

US Foods, Inc. is identified as the secured party in a UCC
Financing Statement filed with the NC Secretary of State (file
number 20180014280H). The Debtor does not believe that any
outstanding accounts payable are owed to US Foods.

The North Carolina Department of Revenue also has an interest in
Cash Collateral by virtue of a tax lien filed in 2020 in the amount
of $17,168.

In its Proof of Claim filed in the case, the Internal Revenue
Service assets a secured claim in the amount of $57,506.

Adequate protection of the Secured Creditors' interest in the
collateral exists in the form of replacement liens in
after-acquired revenue to the same extent as they had prior to the
bankruptcy. Following the period covered by the Order, the Debtor
believes it will be in a position where it can responsibly
determine what, if any, additional adequate protection can be
offered.

The Court ruled that the Debtor may use cash collateral provided
that the secured creditors will be granted liens in after-acquired
revenue to the same extent and priority as they had prior to the
filing of the case.

A further hearing on the matter is scheduled for November 30, at
1:30 p.m

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget for the period from
November 1 to 30, 2021 is available at https://bit.ly/2YpGh5c from
PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $35,000 in total available cash and $30,430 in
total expenses.

                      About A & G Pizza, Inc.

A & G Pizza, Inc. operates "Milano Pizza" in Zebulon, North
Carolina. Milano Pizza has been in business for over 30 years. The
debtor-entity, owned by Aiman Abdelhadi, has operated Milano Pizza
since 2015.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 21-02160) on September
29, 2021. In the petition filed by Aiman Abdelhadi, president, the
Debtor disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $500,000 in
liabilities.

Travis Sasser, Esq., at Sasser Law Firm is the Debtor's counsel.


ALGON CORP: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 30
---------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida,
Miami Division, authorized Algon Corporation to continue using cash
collateral on an interim basis through the end of November 2021.

The Court says the prior Order authorizing continued use of cash
collateral, with all conditions set forth therein, is reaffirmed
and modified only to provide that the Debtor may continue to use
cash collateral in the ordinary course of business and within the
budget constraints set forth in the separately filed November
budget [ECF 338] through the end of November 2021, predicated upon
the payment of $15,000 adequate protection to the secured creditors
by the close of business on  November 12.

A continued hearing on the Debtor's access to cash collateral is
set for November 15 at 2 p.m. via Zoom.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget for November 2021 is
available for free at https://bit.ly/3o2iIIu from
PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $75,000 in cash receipts and $77,818 in total
disbursements for the month.

                      About Algon Corporation

Miami, Fla.-based Algon Corporation -- https://www.algon.com/ -- is
a worldwide distributor of raw materials and industrial parts for
the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industries.

Algon Corp sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-18864) on July 1, 2019.  In the
petition signed by its president, Alfredo Suarez, the Debtor was
estimated to have assets and liabilities of less than $10 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert A. Mark.

The Debtor is represented by Geoffrey S. Aaronson, Esq., at
Aaronson Schantz Beiley P.A.



ALLSPRING BUYER: Fitch Assigns Final 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a final Long-Term Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) and senior secured debt rating of 'BB' to Allspring Buyer
LLC, the main debt-issuing subsidiary of Allspring Global
Investments. The Rating Outlook is Stable. The conversion of
ratings follows the finalization of the separation from Wells Fargo
& Company (WFC; A+/Negative) and the execution of the secured
funding facilities.

Allspring Buyer LLC, formerly known as Zebra Buyer LLC, is a
debt-issuing subsidiary that incorporated to acquire Wells Fargo
Asset Management from WFC by GTCR LLC and Reverence Capital. At the
transaction close, there was $140 million reduction in the term
loan borrowing and a $110 million increase in balance sheet cash,
relative to the terms anticipated when expected ratings were
assigned in April 2021.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The ratings reflect Allspring's good franchise in the traditional
investment management (IM) space, assets under management (AUM)
diversification by asset class, product and distribution channel, a
scalable business model and strong reported investment performance
relative to benchmarks. Ratings also reflect an experienced senior
management team, a cash generative business model and a long-term
distribution agreement with WFC, which should mitigate the risks of
immediate AUM attrition following the transaction close.

The ratings are constrained by the relatively high initial cash
flow leverage, as measured by gross debt/adjusted fee-related
EBITDA (FEBITDA), lower profitability margins relative to peers,
the fully-secured funding profile and limited balance sheet
liquidity. Other rating constraints include a lack of operating
history as a standalone entity and elevated execution risk
associated with a business carve-out, including the challenges of
bringing a new IM brand to market and setting up standalone
operations and risk controls.

An inability to successfully execute the carve-out strategy may
lead to higher initial costs, lower AUM levels, as a result of
lower fund sales and/or increased client attrition and,
consequently, weaker operating performance and higher leverage.
Fitch also believes that the firm's private equity ownership
introduces the potential for more equity-oriented actions in the
medium term, which is partially mitigated by the track record of
Allspring's private equity owners in the financial services
sector.

Fitch believes Allspring is well-positioned among the large
traditional IMs, with $604 billion in AUM as of June 30, 2021,
although it remains materially smaller than the industry leaders.
Allspring's AUM is well diversified by asset class, which is viewed
favorably by Fitch. However, $200 billion of AUM (33.2%) is in
short-term money market funds (MMFs) as of June 30, 2021, which
Fitch believes could increase AUM volatility, liquidity risk in a
stressed scenario, and result in revenue pressure, particularly in
a low interest rate environment.

Allspring's profitability is below that of large public peers.
Fitch expects the run-rate adjusted FEBITDA margin to initially be
in the 18% range, which is at the higher end of Fitch's 'bb'
category benchmark range of 10%-20%. FEBITDA is adjusted for
nonrecurring and one-off carve-out costs, money market revenue
normalization, and over-allocation of corporate costs and other
noncore legacy gains and losses. Fitch believes margin expansion
could be driven by cost optimization over time, as revenue growth
may prove challenging, in light of on-going competitive pressures
in the industry.

Allspring's net flows have averaged 2% of beginning AUM over the
last four years (2017-2020), supported by inflows to short-term
MMF, but were negative 1.8% in 1H21. Flows into long-term funds
averaged a negative 3.3% from 2017-2020 and remained a negative
3.2% in 1H21, which are consistent with Fitch's 'bbb' category
benchmark range for traditional IMs of-5% to 5%.

Pro forma for the $1.1 billion term loan issuance to fund the
acquisition, cash flow leverage is estimated to be 5.6x on a gross
debt/adjusted FEBITDA basis for the TTM ended 2Q21, which is above
Fitch's 'bb' category quantitative benchmark range for traditional
IMs of 3.0x-5.0x. Leverage could reduce substantially if the firm
executes on projected cost reductions and adjusting for one-off
separation costs. An inability to reduce leverage toward or below
4.5x over the outlook horizon would be viewed negatively.

Fitch estimates interest coverage, as measured by pro forma
run-rate adjusted FEBITDA/interest expenses, at 6.2x for the TTM
ended 2Q21, which is just above Fitch's 'bb' category benchmark
range of 3.0x-6.0x for traditional IMs. Coverage of fixed charges,
consisting of both interest expense and the 1% annual loan
amortization, was 4.9x for the same period.

Fitch views Allspring's liquidity as adequate. An increase in
balance sheet cash amounts by $110 million relative to initial
expectations provides additional financial flexibility should there
be increased transition and separation costs, and is viewed
favorably by Fitch. Allspring also has $170 million of revolver
capacity, but the availability could be constrained by a market
dislocation that reduces FEBITDA, given the leverage covenant in
the facility (6.5x tested at 35% utilization).

Allspring's funding profile is fully-secured and consists of a
single seven-year $1.1 billion first-lien secured term loan, which
is weaker than higher-rated peers that have largely unsecured
funding profiles. Still, the funding profile is partially mitigated
by the cash flow generative business model.

The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation that Allspring will
demonstrate sound execution of the carve out strategy, good
operating performance, as reflected in EBITDA margins above 15%, a
decrease in leverage towards 4.5x or below, and sound interest
coverage.

The secured debt rating is equalized with the Long-Term IDR
reflecting Fitch's expectations for average recovery prospects
under a stressed scenario.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- A sustained improvement in reported cash flow leverage
    approaching 3.5x;

-- Gross FEBITDA margins sustained above 20%;

-- A sustained improvement in fixed charge coverage above 5.0x;

-- Improved funding diversity, including an increased proportion
    of unsecured funding;

-- Favorable investment performance and sustained positive long
    term net client flows; and

-- Successful transition to a standalone business and execution
    of strategic objectives, including meaningful fund sales
    through new third-party channels.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Material differences between future consolidated audited
    financial statements relative to management representations;

-- An inability to reduce cash flow leverage below 4.5x,
    particularly if driven by the debt-financed shareholder-
    friendly distributions;

-- Sustained material investment underperformance and/or
    meaningful long-term AUM outflows;

-- A liquidity shortfall or a decline in interest and fixed-
    charge coverage below 3.0x; and

-- An inability to execute on the operating strategy, leading to
    excessive costs or operational failures, or a decline in
    FEBITDA margins below 10%.

The secured debt rating is primarily sensitive to changes in
Allspring's IDR, and secondarily, to material changes in
Allspring's capital structure and/or changes in Fitch's assessment
of the recovery prospects for the debt instrument.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and
Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Allspring Buyer LLC has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Financial
Transparency due to reflecting the sensitivity of the rating to
alignment of audited financial data with management
representations, which has a negative impact on the credit profile,
and is relevant to the rating[s] in conjunction with other
factors.

Allspring Buyer LLC has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for
Management Strategy due to the execution risk associated with
establishing the firm as a standalone business, achievement of
envisioned cost savings and deleveraging, which has a negative
impact on the credit profile, and is relevant to the rating[s] in
conjunction with other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


ALPHA METALLURGICAL: Posts $83.3M Net Income in Third Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing
net income of $83.26 million on $648.84 million of total revenues
for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2021, compared to a net loss
of $68.64 million on $335.59 million of total revenues for the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported net
income of $31.35 million on $1.43 billion of total revenues
compared to a net loss of $346.75 million on $1.09 billion of total
revenues for the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $1.68 billion in total
assets, $1.43 billion in total liabilities, and $248.10 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"We have consistently reiterated that Alpha is well-positioned to
capitalize on market opportunities and this quarter's outstanding
performance is proof of our ability to deliver on those high
expectations," said David Stetson, Alpha's chair and chief
executive officer.  "Additionally, we made meaningful progress on
our commitment to deleveraging the company by reducing our overall
long-term debt and legacy obligations by more than $75 million
during the quarter.  We expect to continue this positive momentum
to create value for our shareholders, and we look forward to what
we believe will be a productive and successful 2022."

"As expected, third quarter met export realizations came in strong
thanks to the robust market and the outstanding work of our sales
team to capitalize on it," said Andy Eidson, Alpha's president and
chief financial officer.  "The vast midyear improvement in the
Australian indices is now evident in our financial performance,
with third quarter realizations on export tons tied to Aussie
indices up $91.10, or 134%, from second quarter levels.
Realizations for export tons priced against other mechanisms were
up $23.64, or 23%, from second quarter realizations."

"In higher pricing environments, costs of coal sales increase due
to a number of factors outside our direct control, including
royalties and taxes," said Jason Whitehead, executive vice
president and chief operating officer.  "Similar to many other
companies, we're also experiencing some inflationary pressure with
the cost of materials increasing.  Despite these challenges, I'm
proud of our operations teams for remaining disciplined and
continuing to manage the costs we can control."

In the third quarter, the company's Met segment cost of coal sales
increased to an average of $76.62 per ton as compared to $69.94 per
ton in the prior quarter.  Cost of coal sales for the All Other
category increased to $47.47 in the third quarter from a second
quarter average cost of $42.77 per ton.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

"Beyond Alpha's very positive revenue results, we reduced our
long-term debt and legacy obligations by over $75 million during
the third quarter," said Eidson.  "In addition to $6.6 million in
scheduled long-term principal payments for the quarter, we elected
to make a voluntary prepayment of $31.0 million in principal on the
term loan, and we repurchased, at a discount, roughly $18.7 million
in outstanding principal borrowings from existing lenders.  Coupled
with the previously-announced $21.2 million payment in July to
extinguish the reclamation funding obligations with the West
Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), these
actions should serve as a roadmap for what shareholders can expect
from us in the coming quarters as we continue strengthening our
balance sheet."
"Subsequent to the quarter end, we made an early payment of $4
million to the WVDEP eliminate the legacy obligations related to
water treatment in West Virginia.  Additionally, we made a payment
of $3.3 million to fully satisfy the remaining legacy reclamation
funding and water treatment obligations owed to the State of
Kentucky.  This follows our early extinguishment of the West
Virginia reclamation funding obligations that was announced last
quarter. These examples further demonstrate our strong commitment
to debt reduction and deleveraging the company," Eidson said.

Cash provided by operating activities for the third quarter of 2021
was $96.0 million, which includes the receipt of the $70 million
tax refund and related interest, compared to the prior period in
which cash used in operating activities was $6.3 million.  Cash
provided by operating activities includes discontinued operations.
Third quarter 2021 capital expenditures were $22.3 million compared
to $17.6 million in capital expenditures in the second quarter.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, Alpha had $78.3 million in unrestricted cash
and $121.7 million in restricted cash, deposits and investments.
Total long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term
debt as of Sept. 30, 2021, was $505.2 million.  At the end of the
third quarter, the company had total liquidity of $183.3 million,
which represents an increase of 38% compared to our total liquidity
at the end of the second quarter, including cash and cash
equivalents of $78.3 million and $105.0 million of unused
availability under the Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility (ABL).
The future available capacity under the ABL is subject to inventory
and accounts receivable collateral requirements and the maintenance
of certain financial ratios.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the company had
no borrowings and $120.0 million in letters of credit outstanding
under the ABL.

Operational Update and Planned 2022 Investments

"Alpha's exceptional third quarter performance is a testament to
the continued dedication of our operations teams and the success of
our ongoing portfolio optimization efforts," said Whitehead.  "With
Slabcamp, our sole remaining thermal mine, on pace to close in the
summer of next year, our 2022 production guidance reflects the
final stage of our transition to a pure-play metallurgical
resources company.  As we look forward to capitalizing on current
market opportunities, 2022 Met segment production is expected to
increase slightly over the already-increased full year 2021
guidance level. I'm confident that our teams across the enterprise
have the ability to deliver on these ambitious goals we've outlined
for the coming year."

During the quarter, a number of key structural milestones were met
to add the fourth section at Road Fork 52, putting the project
ahead of schedule and allowing the section to begin producing in
mid-October.  Additionally, the company has recently completed its
budget for 2022, and the Company'scapital expenditures guidance for
next year includes several important projects that will help
modernize and strategically improve Alpha's operations and prep
plant infrastructure.  These upgrades are expected to provide
increased efficiency and extend the life of these facilities in
return for modest levels of capital investment.

Whitehead commented on the importance of capex projects in 2022:
"As we envision what Alpha can do in the next several years, we
recognize the critical role that preparation plants play in washing
and loading the coal we mine and preparing it for delivery to our
customers.  In partnership with our sales teams, we aim to maximize
these facilities, and we believe modest investment in a few of our
plants will allow for additional output and better capabilities for
the specific coal qualities we're sending through each facility.
Additionally, we plan to begin development on the Cedar Grove No. 3
mine and the Glen Alum mine in the coming year.  Both of these
locations are adjacent to current Alpha operations in West
Virginia, allowing us to leverage existing infrastructure as we
expand into these mines.  Lastly, we have decided to move ahead
with adding a fourth section at our Lynn Branch mine.  All
together, we see this group of projects as a boost to the
organization's future efficiency and effectiveness. Furthermore, we
believe we can accomplish each of these in a timely manner and at a
very reasonable investment level. Therefore, at the midpoint, our
capex guidance for next year includes an increased maintenance
capital projection of approximately $120 million dollars to account
for inflation, and roughly $55 million to invest in Alpha's future
through various projects across the organization."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001704715/000170471521000074/amr-20210930.htm

                     About Alpha Metallurgical

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (NYSE: AMR) (formerly known as
Contura Energy) -- www.AlphaMetResources.com -- is a
Tennessee-based mining company with operations across Virginia and
West Virginia.

Alpha Metallurgical reported a net loss of $446.90 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $316.32 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the
Company had $1.67 billion in total assets, $1.50 billion in total
liabilities, and $170.16 million in total stockholders' equity.

                             *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Dec. 22, 2020, S&P Global Ratings
affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on U.S.-based coal
producer Contura Energy Inc. and revised the liquidity assessment
to less than adequate. S&P said, "We view Contura's business as
vulnerable due to declining thermal demand and prices, which is
driving the company to exit these operations and begin reclamation
work at some of its mines."

In April 2020, Moody's Investors Service downgraded all long-term
ratings for Contura Energy, Inc., including the Corporate Family
Rating to Caa1 from B3.  "Contura has idled the majority of its
mines due to weak market conditions.  Moody's expects that demand
for metallurgical coal will weaken further in the near-term as
blast furnace steel producers adjust to reduced demand due to the
Coronavirus," said Ben Nelson, Moody's vice president -- senior
credit officer and lead analyst for Contura Energy, Inc.  "The
rating action is entirely driven by macro-level concerns resulting
from the global outbreak of coronavirus."


AMERICAN AIRLINES: Meadows Bid to Review Estimation Order Denied
----------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York denied two motions filed by Lawrence M. Meadows related to the
2011 bankruptcy case of AMR Corporation and American Airlines:

   1. A request by Mr. Meadows to temporarily stay the Court's
Order Granting Reorganized Debtors' Motion to Estimate Maximum
Amount of Proof of Claim No. 9676 Under Bankruptcy Code Sections
105(a) and 502(c) for a period of no less than 14 days.

   2. A request for reconsideration of the Estimation Order and
also includes an additional request for a stay of the Estimation
Order pending appeal.

The Court ruled that Mr. Meadows has not met the burden necessary
for reconsideration of either the Estimation Order or the Court's
underlying Estimation Decision.

Mr. Meadows states that he was denied the right to put on expert
and witness testimony at the hearing. But the Court noted that Mr.
Meadows had previously submitted a description of the witness
testimony that he intended to provide and was permitted to make a
proffer of that testimony at the hearing, all of which was
considered by the Court.

In addition to this proffer and the Court hearing extensively from
Mr. Meadows himself, the Court also heard from Herman J. Straub
during the hearing on the Estimation Motion.  Moreover, as noted by
the Court at the hearing, the merits of the Consent Decree are not
directly at issue in the Estimation Motion; this Court's approval
of the Consent Decree is already on appeal, and that record on
appeal already includes Mr. Meadows' arguments about the merits of
the Consent Decree.

The Court found that the balance of the factors weighs against
granting a stay pending appeal. To start, the Court does not find
that Mr. Meadows would sustain irreparable injury if his request
for a stay is denied.

As noted in the Estimation Decision, Mr. Meadows does not have any
pending claims in these bankruptcy cases; all proofs of claim that
he previously filed have been disallowed by this Court. Moreover,
the Reorganized Debtors previously acknowledged that pilots may
participate under the terms of the settlement between the
Reorganized Debtors and the EEOC. Nor does approval of the
Estimation Motion deprive Mr. Meadows of any rights that he may
have with the EEOC for any alleged ongoing discrimination.

But other parties would suffer a substantial injury if a stay were
granted, the Court said.  As noted in the Estimation Decision,
three years of delay necessitated by the appeals of Mr. Meadows
have prevented further distributions in the Reorganized Debtors'
bankruptcy proceeding given the need to hold monies in reserve for
an EEOC claim that would otherwise be undetermined in amount,
absent the settlement.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum of Decision and Order dated
October 28, 2021, is available at https://tinyurl.com/c8apbf3x from
Leagle.com.

                 About American Airlines

AMR Corp. and its subsidiaries including American Airlines, the
third largest airline in the United States, filed for bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 11-15463) in Manhattan on
Nov. 29, 2011, after failing to secure cost-cutting labor
agreements.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Paul Hastings LLP and Debevoise & Plimpton LLP Groom Law
Group, Chartered, as special counsel; Rothschild Inc., as financial
advisor; and Garden City Group Inc. as claims and notice agent.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors retained Skadden,
Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as counsel; Togut, Segal & Segal
LLP as co-counsel for conflicts and other matters; Moelis & Company
LLC as investment banker; and Mesirow Financial Consulting, LLC, as
financial advisor.

AMR Corp., emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on Dec. 9,
2013, upon which it merged with US Airways Group.



ARCH RESOURCES: Moody's Alters Outlook on B2 CFR to Positive
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed all ratings for Arch Resources,
Inc., including the company's B2 Corporate Family Rating, and
revised the rating outlook to positive from stable based largely on
the expectation that the company will reduce debt and non-debt
liabilities in the near-term. Moody's also upgraded the company's
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating ("SGL") to SGL-1 from SGL-2
based on expectations for meaningfully stronger free cash flow
generation in the next 12-18 months.

"Arch completed the Leer South project on time and on budget. Given
the recent strengthening in coal market fundamentals, stronger
export prices, and meaningfully lower capital spending, Arch should
generate significant free cash flow in 2022 that will allow the
company to reduce debt," said Ben Nelson, Moody's Vice President --
Senior Credit Officer and lead analyst for Arch Resources, Inc.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Arch Resources, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD4)

Issuer: WEST VIRGINIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Senior Secured Revenue Bonds, Affirmed B2 (LGD4)

Upgrades:

Issuer: Arch Resources, Inc.

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-1 from SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Arch Resources, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's expects that robust metallurgical coal prices will
translate into stronger earnings and cash flow in the second half
of 2021 with continued strength in 2022. Management indicated that
the company's new metallurgical coal mine in West Virginia (Leer
South) is completed and ramping up production. Business conditions
in the Powder River Basin are temporarily strong on a variety of
factors including high natural gas pricing in regions that consume
PRB coal that encourages gas-to-coal switching by power generators
and various logistical issues present across the region that limits
the coal industry's ability to produce and deliver coal. As the
company takes advantage of a strong market in 2021 and signs new
contracts for 2022, Moody's expects a significant improvement in
earnings and cash flow. Moody's expects that adjusted financial
leverage will fall below 1.5x in the coming quarters and the
company will generate enough cash to achieve a net debt zero
position in 2022. The company will have the opportunity to leverage
the current upcycle in pricing to achieve significant reduction of
debt and non-debt liabilities.

However, Moody's believes that investor concerns about the coal
industry's ESG profile are still intensifying and, notwithstanding
current strength in coal pricing and better debt trading levels,
coal producers will be increasingly challenged by access to capital
issues in the early-to-mid 2020s. An increasing portion of the
global investment community is reducing or eliminating exposure to
the coal industry with greater emphasis on moving away from thermal
coal. A shift toward metallurgical coal, compared to a legacy
position more focused on thermal coal, is an emerging positive
factor from an ESG standpoint. Moody's expects that Arch will shift
in this direction, but maintain substantial thermal coal operations
with a slow but steady scale down to occur in the coming years. The
aggregate impact on the credit quality of the coal industry is that
debt capital will become more expensive over this horizon,
particularly in the public bond markets and other business
requirements, such as surety bonds, which together will lead to
much more focus on individual coal producers' ability to fund their
operations and articulate clearly their approach to addressing
environmental, social, and governance considerations -- including
reducing net debt in the near-to-medium term. Arch reported about
$555 million of total debt as of September 30, 2021.

The B2 CFR reflects a diverse platform of seven coal mining assets
in the United States capable of strong cash flow generation. The
company's approach to maintaining low debt levels and a significant
liquidity cushion helped the company withstand difficult industry
conditions despite severe earnings compression.Operational risk is
a constraint, with meaningful concentration of earnings and cash
flow expected at specific mining sites: Black Thunder thermal coal
mine in the Powder River Basin, Leer mining complex in Northern
Appalachia, and the new Leer South mining complex in Northern
Appalachia. Credit quality is constrained more significantly by the
inherent volatility of the global metallurgical coal industry,
ongoing secular decline in the US thermal coal industry, and ESG
factors. The rating also takes into consideration that some mining
assets have less favorable long-term operating prospects in the
coming years and, therefore, could be subject to more significant
reclamation-related spending over the rating horizon.

The SGL-1 reflects Moody's expectation for very good liquidity to
support operations over the next 12-18 months. Moody's expects that
the company will generate significant free cash flow in 2022. The
primary source of liquidity beyond internally-generated free cash
flow is the company's cash balance combined with modest
availability under an accounts receivables securitization facility
and an unrated inventory-based revolving credit facility. The SGL
rating could be downgraded to SGL-2 if available liquidity remains
below $300 million.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Environmental, social, and governance factors are important factors
influencing Arch's credit quality. The company is exposed to ESG
issues typical for a company in the coal mining industry, including
increasing global demand for renewable energy that is detrimental
to demand for thermal coal, especially in the United States and
Western Europe. Exposure to carbon transition risk and
environmental reclamation obligations are the most significant
environmental exposures. Social issues include factors such as
community relations, operational track record, and health and
safety issues associated with coal mining such as black lung
disease. Through capital investment in the Leer South project, Arch
Resources has been reducing exposure to thermal coal, which carries
greater ESG-related risks, and increasing exposure to metallurgical
coal, which carries lower ESG-related risks. Arch Resources sold
its last thermal coal mine in Appalachia in December 2019 -- a
surface mine called Coal-Mac -- and has signaled an intention to
reduce emphasis on thermal coal mining in other regions.
Governance-related risks are representative of a publicly traded
coal company with an ongoing emphasis on maintaining balance sheet
cash and very good liquidity.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The positive outlook signals the potential for a rating upgrade in
response to meaningful debt reduction. Moody's could upgrade the
rating with expectations for free cash flow generation above $100
million, meaningful debt reduction, and financial policies
consistent that support maintaining a low net debt position in the
medium-to-long term. Moody's could downgrade the rating with
weakening in metallurgical coal pricing below long-term averages,
expectations for available liquidity to fall below $175 million, or
any meaningful operational issues at the company's Black Thunder or
Leer mines.

Arch Resources is one of the largest coal producers in the United
States. The company has two mining complexes in the Powder River
Basin, four mining complexes in Appalachia, and one mine in
Colorado. The company generated about $1.5 billion of revenue in
2020.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Mining
published in October 2021.


ARUBA INVESTMENTS: Fitch Lowers LongTerm IDR to 'B'
---------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Aruba Investments, Inc.'s (d/b/a ANGUS
Chemical Company) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'B' from
'B+', first lien secured revolver and term loans to 'BB-'/'RR2'
from 'BB'/RR2', and second lien term loan to 'CCC+'/'RR6' from
'B-'/'RR6'. In addition, Fitch has assigned Aruba's new five-year
$200 million unsecured HoldCo notes a 'CCC'/'RR6' rating, following
the company's announcement that it intends to raise $100 million in
new secured debt and $200 million in new unsecured HoldCo notes in
order to fund a $300 million distribution to shareholders.

Fitch has also assigned Kobe US Midco 2, Inc. (HoldCo), the holder
of the new notes a 'B-' IDR. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The downgrade reflects the addition of $300 million in new debt to
the company's already highly levered capital structure.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Elevated Leverage, High FCF: More than a year after taking on
roughly $450 million in secured debt in conjunction with Ardian's
purchase of a 50% stake in the company, Aruba is again adding on
around $300 million in new debt. Although $200 million of the new
debt will be issued at the HoldCo level, and exists outside of the
secured debt's borrowing group, and lacks guarantees, the new
debt's Pay if You Can PIK Toggle structure may materially impact
OpCo's cash generation nonetheless.

Fitch believes that the company will likely retire notes as soon as
is feasible, as they are likely to be the company's highest-cost
piece of debt. The new debt, alongside the $100 million in new
secured debt issued at the OpCo level, will weigh on the company's
credit metrics, leading to total debt with equity credit/operating
EBITDA above 6.0x and FFO Interest Coverage below 2.0x throughout
the forecast period.

Although the HoldCo notes, issued at the HoldCo level, will not
contribute to Aruba Investments, Inc.'s (OpCo's) leverage metrics,
Fitch notes that their Pay if You Can PIK Toggle structure
indicates they may nonetheless require regular upstream
distributions. Fitch forecasts FCF generation of above $60 million
by 2024, which could help pay down some of the company's debt;
however, materially deleveraging will also require robust EBITDA
growth.

Resilient, Consistent Performance: Aruba's yoy revenue and EBITDA
increased throughout 2020 and into 2021 despite the pandemic's
economic impact, which Fitch believes reflects the resilience of
Aruba's business through economic downturns. Growth in Aruba's Life
Sciences and Personal Care segments has been supported in part
during the pandemic by demand for its chemical products, which have
experienced increased demand to combat the spread of COVID-19, for
products like hand sanitizers, vaccines, as well as diagnostic
testing kits.

Softer demand in certain industrial end markets, such as
metalworking fluids, that weakened during the pandemic as end
markets slowed, have largely recovered, further supporting Aruba's
performance.

The company continues to invest in shifting its sales mix toward
the higher growth end markets of Life Sciences and Personal Care,
with 49% of sales now attributable to these markets. The shift has
been supported by greater organic growth trends and investments.
The continued rebalancing toward these end markets, which offer
more pricing power and greater potential to increase product
breadth through new market demands, provides a pathway to
simultaneously grow and stabilize the company's cash flows.

Global Producer of Nitroalkanes: Aruba is the only global
commercial producer of nitroalkanes, and the only manufacturer in
the world to use propane nitration technology, which can yield a
highly specialized nitroalkane derivate product portfolio. It is
often the only supplier for many of its key products.

The majority of Aruba's end markets are characterized by high
switching costs with Aruba having a low share of end-product costs.
Products are also frequently essential ingredients in formulations
and processes. This contributes to the longevity of customer
relationships. As a niche producer in the additives industry, Aruba
has significant scale and technical expertise barriers to
prospective entrants.

Limited Input Price Risk: Aruba utilizes over 100 different raw
materials as inputs into its chemistries. The most prominent of
these are propane, ammonia, formaldehyde, hydrogen and natural gas.
Most of these inputs are directly or indirectly linked to natural
gas prices, as ammonia production uses natural gas, propane can be
a co-product of natural gas processing, and formaldehyde is indexed
to methanol, which is tied to natural gas.

Aruba's Sterlington, LA site is strategically located to take
advantage of raw material security through the abundance of U.S.
shale production in the region. Risks to Aruba arising from
fluctuations in raw material input costs are limited due to the
company's value-based approach to pricing.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

In the 'B' rating category, Aruba compares well against rated peers
Kronos Worldwide Inc. (B+/Stable), TPC Group Inc. (B-/Negative) and
Tronox Limited in terms of EBITDA margin, FFO interest coverage and
FCF generation. It is towards the lower end of the peer group in
terms of size based on revenue and at the top with Tronox in terms
of gross leverage.

At $348 million in 2020 revenues, Aruba is significantly smaller
then Kronos Worldwide at $1.6 billion and public chemical peer
Tronox Holdings at $2.7 billion. Aruba's EBITDA margins in the 40%
range are at the top end of the peer group, notably higher than
Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (volatile margins between approximately 10%
and 25%) and chemical peer Tronox Holdings' (18%-25%). Aruba also
exceeds chemicals peer TPC Group's margins in the low to mid-teens.
Aruba's high EBITDA margins reflect its products' barriers to entry
and its customers' high switching costs.

Parent-Subsidiary Linkage: Fitch rates the HoldCo's IDR one notch
below that of its stronger subsidiary, OpCo. The notching stems
from the legal and structural separations between the two,
including covenant protections for OpCo's debt, which limit the
ability of the direct parent to dilute its credit quality. Key
covenants include limitations on guarantees to affiliates,
restrictions on dividends, asset sales and restrictions on the
incurrence of additional indebtedness. OpCo does not guarantee
HoldCo debt and a HoldCo default does not cross default OpCo.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Sales growth is driven by gains in Life Sciences and Home and
    Personal Care throughout the forecast period while Custom
    Chemicals and Industrial Specialties experience more moderate
    growth. Near-term moderation in Personal Care, as sanitizers
    and benefiting pandemic-related demand normalizes;

-- EBITDA margins expand modestly throughout the forecast period
    as raw material prices normalize;

-- Modest voluntary 1L debt repayment - HoldCo notes repaid by
    2024 to manage cost of capital;

-- Capex at roughly 7.5% of sales.

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

Going-Concern (GC) Approach

Fitch's recovery analysis uses a consolidated approach and a $145
million going concern EBITDA. This going concern approximates a
bottom-cycle EBITDA in the stress case and reflects the economic
resilience Aruba has demonstrated through the pandemic.

An EV multiple of 7.0x is applied in Fitch's recovery analysis. The
7.0x multiple is at the upper end within Fitch's chemicals
portfolio, and is warranted to reflect relatively lower cash flow
risk, as demonstrated by Aruba's performance during the pandemic,
strong EBITDA and FCF margin and the inherent growth of its Life
Science segment. The 7.0x multiple is also within the range of
historical bankruptcy case study exit multiples for peer companies,
which ranged from 5.2x-7.7x, but above the median of 5.9x. It is
also significantly below the multiple Aruba was acquired for (by
Golden Gate Capital in 2015), and the multiple at which Ardian's
current investment was made.

Fitch estimates the going concern EV value to be approximately
$1,015 million. This is greater than the liquidation value, which
includes the value of Aruba's IP discounted at 50%. After a 10%
adjustment for administrative claims, $914 million remains for
creditors.

With an assumed 80% draw on the company's $125 million revolving
facility, ~$960 million USD equivalent first lien term loan B
tranches and a $345 million second lien term loan B, the going
concern EV approach results in a recovery rating of 'BB-'/'RR2' for
the first lien facilities, a 'CCC+'/'RR6' for the second lien term
loan, and a 'CCC'/'RR6' for the HoldCo notes.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Demonstrated prioritization of debt reduction over shareholder
    distributions, leading to total debt with equity
    credit/operating EBITDA durably below 6.0x;

-- FFO interest charge coverage durably above 2.5x;

-- Continued revenue growth and end market diversification led by
    Life Sciences and Personal Care, while maintaining EBITDA
    margins.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- FFO interest charge coverage sustained below 2.0x;

-- A prioritization of shareholder returns or an inability to
    achieve gross debt reduction;

-- Weakening in EBITDA margins and FCF resulting in total debt
    with equity credit/operating EBITDA durably above 6.5x.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity, Limited Maturities: Fitch anticipates Aruba
will generally hold around $20 million in cash. Excess cash is
likely to be used to reduce debt, and Fitch notes that the HoldCo
notes' Pay if You Can PIK Toggle structure may result in upstream
dividends for the purpose of debt service. Working capital
requirements are manageable, and Aruba can utilize its cash balance
as well as its $125 million revolving credit facility for any
short- or medium-term liquidity needs. High margins and modest
capex requirements have supported FCF growth in recent years up to
$57 million for 2019 and $54 million for 2020.

ISSUER PROFILE

Aruba Investments, Inc. is a global specialty chemicals producer
with a 70+ year track record, operating in four major categories:
Life Sciences, Personal Care, Industrial Specialties, and Custom
Chemicals. Originally a subsidiary of The Dow Chemical Company,
Aruba is commonly known as ANGUS Chemical Company.


ARUBA INVESTMENTS: Moody's Cuts CFR to B3, Alters Outlook to Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded Aruba Investments
Holdings, LLC's (dba ANGUS Chemical Company) Corporate Family
Rating to B3 from B2, Probability of Default Rating to B3-PD from
B2-PD and first lien credit facilities to B2 from B1. The second
lien term loan is affirmed at Caa1. The outlook changed to stable
from negative. Moody's also assigned a Caa2 rating to the proposed
$200 million senior PIK toggle notes due 2026 issued by Kobe US
Midco 2, Inc.

"The downgrade is a result of a more aggressive financial policy
than previously expected and reflects the increased leverage
related to the proposed debt-financed dividend which follows a
dividend in 2020 and subsequent acquisition that had already
pressured the rating," said Domenick R. Fumai, Vice President and
lead analyst for Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B3 from B2

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B3-PD from B2-PD

Gtd Senior Secured 1st Lien Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to B2
(LGD3) from B1 (LGD3)

Affirmed:

Issuer: Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC

Gtd.Senior Secured 2nd Lien Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Caa1
(LGD5)

Assigned:

Issuer:Kobe US Midco 2, Inc.

Senior Unsecured Regular/Bond Debenture, Assigned Caa2 (LGD6)

Outlook Action:

Issuer: Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC

Outlook, changed to Stable from Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's views the increased debt resulting from the proposed
transaction, which includes a $100 million first lien term loan
add-on plus the issuance of $200 million in senior unsecured HoldCo
PIK toggle notes as a credit negative following a substantial
increase in debt in November 2020 to fund Golden Gate Capital's
sale of a 50% ownership stake in the company to Ardian. Moreover,
the sizable dividend reflects a more aggressive financial policy
than previously expected given ANGUS only recently paid a dividend
of $70 million less than a year ago.

Pro forma for the term loan add-on and PIK toggle notes, Moody's
estimates ANGUS' Debt/EBITDA of about 9.0x, including standard
adjustments, in FY 2021 improving towards 8.1x in FY 2022. Moody's
considers the company's credit metrics as more reflective of a B3
rating and will exceed the previous rating trigger of 6.0x for a
sustained period.

ANGUS' B3 rating is constrained by elevated leverage following the
recapitalization and debt-financed dividend. ANGUS added roughly
$450 million in debt to fund Ardian's investment and the proposed
transaction would add another $300 million of debt. The amount of
total debt relative to the asset base and size of the company
further temper the rating. The lack of scale and significant
operational concentration with dependence on two plants are
additional considerations limiting the rating. The rating also
includes heightened risks associated with private equity ownership
including an aggressive financial policy and minority
representation by independent directors.

The B3 CFR is underpinned by ANGUS' strong EBITDA margins and ample
free cash flow generation. ANGUS' business profile is characterized
by very good geographic diversity and solid market positions
serving a varied number of end markets, including several fairly
defensive end markets such as pharmaceutical, life sciences and HPC
(home and personal care), that partially offset exposure to its
industrial-related end markets. The company enjoys multiple
barriers to entry including advanced formulations and backward
integration that support strong profitability and attractive EBITDA
margins and many of its products benefit from its strong position
in nitroalkanes.

The stable outlook reflects expectations that ANGUS' operating
performance will continue to perform well, including further
revenue and EBITDA growth and free cash flow generation to support
the additional leverage.

STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS

The Caa2 rating for the proposed $200 million senior unsecured PIK
toggle notes issued by Kobe US Midco 2, Inc., two notches below the
B3 CFR, reflects the fact that the holding company debt is
structurally and contractually subordinated to debt at Aruba
Investments Holdings, LLC. Moody's believes that Aruba Investments
Holdings, LLC is adequately ring-fenced from Kobe US Midco 2, Inc.
and that the debt at Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC is therefore
closer to the assets and cash flow. Moody's expects the PIK toggle
notes to have limited recovery prospects given the substantial
amount of debt with priority claims that rank ahead of them.
However, given that the PIK toggle notes mature prior to the
existing debt at Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC, Moody's expects
these notes will be refinanced with additional debt at Aruba rather
than be repaid at maturity.

The B2 ratings assigned to the senior secured first lien credit
facilities are one notch above the B3 CFR reflecting their
seniority in the debt capital structure. The Caa1 rating assigned
to the second lien term loan, one notch below the B3 CFR, reflects
the subordination to the first lien credit facilities which have a
claim on substantially all the assets of the company and guarantors
and rank ahead of the second lien term loan in terms of claims on
such assets.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Moody's also evaluates environmental, social and governance factors
in the rating consideration. Governance was a major factor in the
rating action as evidenced by the aggressive financial policy of
ANGUS' financial sponsors, Golden Gate Capital and Ardian. Other
governance risks include a board of directors with majority
representation by members affiliated with the sponsors and reduced
financial disclosure requirements as a private company, though the
company does provide more information in its financial statements
than most companies owned by private equity sponsors. The chemical
properties of several key raw materials, including ammonia, propane
and formaldehyde, could result in future product and environmental
liability claims if improperly handled; however, ANGUS does not
currently have any substantial litigation or remediation related to
environmental issues. ANGUS has clearly stated sustainability and
environment, health and safety policies on its website. Several of
the company's products are important chemical intermediates in the
pharmaceutical and life sciences industries, which are important
social considerations.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade is unlikely over the 18 months due to the elevated
financial leverage; however, Moody's would consider an upgrade if
Debt/EBITDA is sustained below 6.5x, retained cash flow-to-debt
(RCF/Debt) is maintained above 10%, and the financial sponsors
commit to a more conservative financial policy.

Moody's would downgrade the ratings if free cash flow is negative
for a sustained period, liquidity deteriorates below $75 million,
or operating performance is significantly below expectations. In
addition, other factors such as an adverse operational event,
particularly at the company's main production facility in
Louisiana, could result in a downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemical
Industry published in March 2019.

Aruba Investments Holdings, LLC is a holding company that owns
ANGUS Chemical Company. Headquartered in Buffalo Grove, IL, ANGUS
produces performance additives for end markets including paints and
coatings, pharmaceuticals, biotech, metalworking fluids, personal
care, agriculture, and biocides. Golden Gate Capital purchased the
company from Dow Chemical in a leveraged transaction which closed
in February 2015. In November 2020, private equity firm, Ardian,
acquired a 50% ownership interest in ANGUS from Golden Gate
Capital, which retains a 50% stake, for a total enterprise value of
$2.25 billion. ANGUS generated approximately $370 million in
revenue for the twelve months ending June 30, 2021.


ARUBA INVESTMENTS: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on Aruba
Investments Holdings LLC (doing business as Angus Chemical Co.).
The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "We also assigned our 'CCC' issue-level rating to Kobe US
Midco 2 Inc.'s newly proposed senior PIK toggle notes. The recovery
rating is '6'.

"At the same time, the issue-level rating on the company's existing
first-lien debt remains 'B-', and the issue-level rating its
existing second-lien debt remains 'CCC'. The recovery ratings are
'3' and '6', respectively.

"The stable rating outlook on Angus reflects our expectation that
its operating performance will enable it to maintain credit
measures we view as appropriate for the current rating, including
debt to EBITDA above 7x while maintaining strong profitability
measures."

The rating action follows Angus' announcement that it will add
additional debt to fund a dividend to shareholders.

Angus is planning to add on $100 million to its existing term loan
B while at the same time issuing $200 million of senior PIK toggle
notes out of a parent organization, Kobe US Midco 2 Inc. to fund a
$300 million dividend to its shareholders. With the increase in
leverage, Angus's credit metrics remain on the weaker end of highly
leveraged compared with similarly rated specialty chemical
companies such as Diamond (BC) B.V.

The rating on Angus reflects S&P's view of its leading market
position in the niche nitroalkane specialty chemicals industry,
above-average profitability in the sector, and positive free cash
flow generation.

The company delivers key product offerings to a wide range of end
markets, including life sciences, paints and coatings, and
pharmaceutical products. High barriers to entry, customer
stickiness, and Angus' high product performance relative to cost
continue to support its leading market positions and overall margin
profile. Angus' EBITDA margins have remained well above average
compared with other specialty chemical rated peers such as Cabot
Microelectronics. In addition to Angus continuing to operate with
its very high EBITDA margins, it also benefits from the location of
its facilities and the lack of direct competition for most of its
specialty chemical products. It is the only manufacturer of some of
its chemicals in the world and a critical input for many of its
customers products.

S&P Global Ratings notes that Angus' willingness to fund a dividend
with 100% debt financing represents aggressive financial policies
that are reflected in the 'B-' issuer-credit rating.

S&P said, "We continue to assess the financial risk profile of
Angus as highly leveraged. We forecast Angus' weighted-average
adjusted debt to EBITDA to be in the 7x-8x range and funds from
operations (FFO) to debt to be below 12% over the next 12 months.
The company is owned by two financial sponsors, Ardian and Golden
Gate Capital.

"The stable outlook on Angus reflects our expectation that it will
continue to benefit from its niche specialty chemical offering to
favorable end markets the company serves. We also believe some of
Angus' key end markets--such as metalworking fluids, coatings, and
electronics will see improvement as we recover from the global
pandemic. Our base case expectations are that weighted-average debt
to EBITDA will remain above 7x in 2021 and FFO to debt will be
8%-9% over the next 12 months.

"We could take a negative rating action over the next 12 months if
we believed debt to EBITDA would increase to above 9x for
consecutive quarters, because we would consider that to be
approaching unsustainable levels. Debt to EBITDA could approach 9x
if EBITDA margins dropped significantly from our 2021 expectations,
such as by 400 basis points (bps) from our 2021 base case
expectations. This would likely happen if Angus' end markets
performed worse than we expect as a result of economic uncertainty
or supply chain issues or if the company experienced any operating
issues at its plants. This could also occur if financial policies
were more aggressive then we currently factor in, such as if there
were additional debt-funded dividends beyond the $300 million
proposed or an acquisition.

"We could take a positive rating action over the next 12 months if
Angus maintained debt to EBITDA below 7x on a sustained basis. Debt
to EBITDA could approach 7x if EBITDA margins improved by more than
400 bps from our 2021 base case expectations. These improvements
would likely be the result of Angus weathering the current
macroeconomic environment better than we expect and continued
improvement across all key end markets."



AUTO-SWAGE PRODUCTS: Amends Plan to Add CT-DEEP Subordinated Claim
------------------------------------------------------------------
Auto-Swage Products, Inc. submitted a Second Amended Disclosure
Statement for Liquidating Plan of Reorganization dated October 29,
2021.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has been working toward
consummating a sale and marketing the Property. On September 15,
2021, the Court granted the Debtor's Application to Retain Levey
Miller Maretz, LLC as Real Estate Broker and Consultant to the
Debtor. Since that time LMM has been actively marketing and showing
the Property. The Property is listed on LoopNet, a "for Sale" sign
has been placed at the Property, and showings have occurred.

Given the extensive pre-petition marketing and additional post
petition marketing, the Debtor submits that the Property has been
extensively exposed to the market. Therefore, the Court has set the
following dates and deadlines to expeditiously effectuate a sale of
the Property.

     * December 14 at 3:00 p.m., December 15, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is
the Sale Hearing/Confirmation Hearing.

     * December 10, 2021 at 12:00 noon is the Objection to
Sale/Confirmation with Closing no later than December 17, 2021.

This is a single-asset real estate case. Accordingly, the Debtor's
only material asset is the Property. Additional assets include: (a)
cash on hand; (b) an oral lease with Wilson Anchor Sleeve, LLC (the
"Tenant") for $1,200 per month; and (c) remaining personal property
at the Property.

The Debtor has retained a small amount of equipment. It is the view
of Mr. Brenton that this equipment, which has been sitting unused
for more than 3 years, is valueless at this time. However, a 2018
appraisal of the equipment indicates a value then of approximately
$26,000.00. Should any party be interested in purchasing this
equipment, they may propose to do so. The Debtor intends to sell
this equipment pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, and distribute any
proceeds to Holders of Allowed Claims, in accordance with the
Bankruptcy Code.

Class 8 – General Unsecured Claims: Class 8 consists of all
Allowed Unsecured Claims in the approximate amount of $24,000.00.
Allowed Class 8 Claims (General Unsecured Claims) shall be paid a
pro rata share of the Unsecured Creditors Fund, which sum shall be
no less than $5,000.00. Payment shall be the later of (a) the
Effective Date or (b) upon an Unsecured Claim becoming an Allowed
Unsecured Claim.

Class 9 - CT DEEP Subordinated Claim: Class 9 consists of the
claims of CT-DEEP that exceed the value of its Class 7 Allowed
Claim. On October 7, 2021, CT-DEEP filed a Proof of Claim (Claim
No. 4-1) in the amount of $1,008,768.66. Therefore, the amount of
the CT-DEEP Subordinated Claim is $850,373.05. Based on
negotiations of the parties, CT-DEEP has agreed to subordinate the
CT-DEEP Subordinated Claim to Class 8 Allowed Claims. It is not
presently anticipated that the CT-DEEP Subordinated Claim will
receive a payment. However, if Class 8 Allowed Claims are paid in
full, Class 9 will receive a distribution in accordance with
Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtor intends to sell the Property pursuant to the Stalking
Horse Agreement, subject to higher and better offers as set forth
in the Sale Motion and Bidding Procedures. While the Debtor has
extensively marketed the Property for several years prior to the
Petition Date, the Debtor has retained Levey Miller & Maretz, LLC
(the "Broker") to engage in a marketing program for a period of
approximately 2 months from September 15, 2021 until November 19,
2021, and, if additional Qualified Bidders are identified, to hold
an auction among the Stalking Horse Bidder and other Qualified
Bidders. If no other Qualified Bidders are identified, the Debtor
will sell the Property pursuant to the Stalking Horse Agreement.

The Bankruptcy Court has set December 14, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. for the
Confirmation Hearing on the Plan.

The Court has set December 10, 2021 at 12:00 noon, as the deadline
for filing and serving objections to the confirmation of the Plan.


A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
October 29, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/2YeXyxJ from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Debtor's Counsel:

     Jeffrey M. Sklarz (ct20938)
     Joanna M. Kornafel (ct29199)
     Green & Sklarz LLC
     1 Audubon St, 3rd Fl
     New Haven, CT 06511
     Tel: 203-285-8545
     Fax: 203-823-4546
     Email: jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com
     jkornafel@gs-lawfirm.com

                    About Auto-Swage Products

Auto-Swage Products, Inc., is a Connecticut corporation engaged in
metal finishing operations.  The Debtor sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 21
50502) on Aug. 7, 2021, disclosing $626,883 in total assets and
$1,239,385 in total liabilities.  Judge Julie A. Manning oversees
the case.  Jeffrey M. Sklarz, Esq., at Green & Sklarz, LLC serves
as the Debtor's legal counsel.


AUTO-SWAGE PRODUCTS: Further Fine-Tunes Plan Documents
------------------------------------------------------
Auto-Swage Products, Inc., submitted a Third Amended Disclosure
Statement for Liquidating Plan of Reorganization dated November 1,
2021.

The Bankruptcy Court has ordered that original Ballots for the
acceptance or rejection of the Plan must be received on or before
December 6, 2021.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has been working toward
consummating a sale and marketing the Property. On September 15,
2021, the Court granted the Debtor's Application to Retain Levey
Miller Maretz, LLC as Real Estate Broker and Consultant to the
Debtor. Since that time LMM has been actively marketing and showing
the Property. The Property is listed on LoopNet, a "for Sale" sign
has been placed at the Property, and showings have occurred.

This is a single-asset real estate case. Accordingly, the Debtor's
only material asset is the Property. Additional assets include: (a)
cash on hand; (b) an oral lease with Wilson Anchor Sleeve, LLC (the
"Tenant") for $1,200 per month; and (c) remaining personal property
at the Property.

The Third Amended Disclosure Statement does not alter the proposed
treatment for unsecured creditors and the equity holder:

     * Class 8 consists of all Allowed Unsecured Claims in the
approximate amount of $24,000.00. Allowed Class 8 Claims (General
Unsecured Claims) shall be paid a pro rata share of the Unsecured
Creditors Fund, which sum shall be no less than $5,000.00. Payment
shall be the later of (a) the Effective Date or (b) upon an
Unsecured Claim becoming an Allowed Unsecured Claim.

     * Class 10 consists of the Equity Interests in the Debtor.
Class 10 is impaired by the Plan, and each holder of a Class 10
Equity Interest is conclusively presumed to have rejected the Plan
pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 1126(g). Interests will be
terminated upon consummation of the Plan.

The Debtor intends to sell the Property pursuant to the Stalking
Horse Agreement, subject to higher and better offers as set forth
in the Sale Motion and Bidding Procedures. While the Debtor has
extensively marketed the Property for several years prior to the
Petition Date, the Debtor has retained Levey Miller & Maretz, LLC
(the "Broker") to engage in a marketing program for a period of
approximately 2 months from September 15, 2021 until November 19,
2021, and, if additional Qualified Bidders are identified, to hold
an auction among the Stalking Horse Bidder and other Qualified
Bidders. If no other Qualified Bidders are identified, the Debtor
will sell the Property pursuant to the Stalking Horse Agreement.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement dated
November 01, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3bKcLtU from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Debtor's Counsel:

     Jeffrey M. Sklarz
     Joanna M. Kornafel
     Green & Sklarz LLC
     1 Audubon St, 3rd Fl
     New Haven, CT 06511
     Tel: 203-285-8545
     Fax: 203-823-4546
     E-mail: jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com
             jkornafel@gs-lawfirm.com

                    About Auto-Swage Products

Auto-Swage Products, Inc., is a Connecticut corporation engaged in
metal finishing operations.  The Debtor sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 21
50502) on Aug. 7, 2021, disclosing $626,883 in total assets and
$1,239,385 in total liabilities.  Judge Julie A. Manning oversees
the case.  Jeffrey M. Sklarz, Esq., at Green & Sklarz, LLC serves
as the Debtor's legal counsel.


BASIC ENERGY: Court Approves Bankruptcy Wind-Down Settlement
------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf of Bloomberg Law reports that Basic Energy Services Inc.
and its creditors won bankruptcy court approval to enter into a
deal dividing the proceeds of the oil and gas company's remaining
assets sold for about $100 million.

The settlement, approved during a virtual hearing Friday by Judge
David Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Texas, enables the parties to move forward without pursuing a
formal Chapter 11 liquidation plan.

Key stakeholders rejected loose frameworks of a plan that would
formally wrap up the case.

According to the court filing, as a result of a competitive
marketing process, the Debtors generated significantly greater
value than originally provided under the stalking horse bids
through an increase in the aggregate purchase price for such assets
by more than $27 million, and realized approximately $100 million
in sale proceeds, while preserving over 2,200 jobs.

The $35 million debtor-in-possession financing funded by members of
the Ad Hoc Group was predicated on the Debtors agreeing to work
with the Ad Hoc Group and other parties in good faith during the
Chapter 11 Cases to formulate a plan for how the estates would be
resolved after the sales closed.  

The Debtors provided parties with a proposed wind down budget or
waterfall recovery analysis on Oct. 8, 2021.  The Debtors' initial
chapter 11 plan wind down budget contemplated substantial costs
payable from secured creditors' collateral, and consequently
diminished recoveries for secured creditors.  As a result, the Ad
Hoc Group indicated to the Debtors that they could not reasonably
support the Debtors' chapter 11 proposal.  Although a revised wind
down budget subsequently provided by the Debtors reduced wind down
costs slightly, the Ad Hoc Group projected that a chapter 7
liquidation would result in lower costs than the Debtors' chapter
11 alternative.

Faced with the inability to access cash collateral and the threat
of conversion to chapter 7, the Debtors pursued discussions with
the Ad Hoc Group and the Creditors' Committee on an alternative
resolution to these cases.

Specifically, the Global Settlement provides, among other things:

   * The consolidation of all remaining assets of the Debtors'
estates in the main
case, with the remaining administration of the Debtors' estates to
be managed by a newly appointed wind down director who will replace
the existing board.  Basic's chapter 11 case will continue and
remain subject to supervision of the Court;  

   * A pool of $1.5 million from the proceeds of Prepetition
Secured Notes Collateral for distributions to administrative
creditors, $250,000 of which will be funded immediately and an
additional $1.25 million will be reserved from Future Proceeds;

   * A pool of $1.5 million from the proceeds of Prepetition
Secured Notes Collateral for prepetition general unsecured
creditors, $250,000 of which will be funded immediately plus an
additional $1.25 million will be reserved from Future Proceeds;

   * Satisfaction in full of secured tax claims that benefit from
senior tax liens
as well as the Debtors' portion of 2021 taxes that are required to
be paid under the Court-approved asset purchase agreements (the
"Asset Purchase Agreements"), which the Debtors estimate at $4.7
million;

   * Full payments of any unpaid employee health and welfare claims
up to $2.5
million from the proceeds of Prepetition Secured Notes Collateral,
$2 million of which will be funded immediately with an additional
$500,000 to be funded from Future Proceeds;

   * The appointment of a wind down representative and
establishment of a wind
down reserve of $1.5 million from the proceeds of Prepetition
Secured Notes Collateral to administer remaining claims and assets
of the Debtors' estates, $1.25 million of which will be funded
immediately plus an additional $250,000 will be reserved from
Future Proceeds; and  

   * An immediate interim cash distribution to Prepetition Secured
Noteholders
of the current cash proceeds of Prepetition Secured Notes
Collateral less various reserves described below plus future
distributions of cash proceeds of Prepetition Secured Notes
Collateral so long as cash on hand after such distribution exceeds
$1 million; provided, that, the portion of such distributions on
account of Prepetition Secured Notes held by Ascribe will be held
in a disputed claim reserve.  
  
   * The estimated amount of the interim distribution to
Prepetition Secured Noteholders is approximately $12 million.

                   About Basic Energy Services

Basic Energy Services, Inc. -- http://www.basices.com/-- provides
wellsite services essential to maintaining production from the oil
and gas wells within its operating areas.  Its operations are
managed regionally and are concentrated in major United States
onshore oil-producing regions located in Texas, California, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Wyoming, North Dakota,
Colorado and Montana.  Specifically, Basic Energy Services has a
significant presence in the Permian Basin, Bakken, Los Angeles and
San Joaquin Basins, Eagle Ford, Haynesville and Powder River
Basin.

Basic Energy Services and 12 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 21-90002) on Aug. 17,
2021. As of March 31, 2021, Basic Energy disclosed total assets of
$331 million and debt of $549 million.

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal counsel,
AlixPartners LLP as restructuring advisor, and Lazard Freres &
Company as financial advisor. Prime Clerk is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  Snow &
Green, LLP and Brown Rudnick, LLP, serve as the committee's legal
counsel.  Riveron RTS, LLC, formerly known as Conway MacKenzie,
LLC, is the financial advisor.


BCP RENAISSANCE: Fitch Affirms B+ Rating on Sr. Secured Debt
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the senior secured debt issued by BCP
Renaissance Parent, LLC (BCP) at 'B+'/'RR3'. The Rating Outlook is
revised to Stable from Negative.

RATING RATIONALE

The rating reflects continued exposure to weak or unrated
counterparties for most revenue at the Rover Pipeline (Rover)
entity, Rover's favorable competitive position, and significant
refinance risk at BCP in 2024 when the project's term loan B's
(TLB) mature. The revision in the Rating Outlook reflects the
easing in 2021 of significant downward credit pressures on most of
Rover's gas producing counterparties that occurred in 2020 due
primarily to market dislocation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Counterparty risk is partly mitigated by Rover's favorable position
of offering firm transportation to export natural gas volumes
produced in the Marcellus and Utica regions into higher priced
hubs, though there is competition for this service. Under rating
case assumptions, leverage at TLB maturity is about 6.7x. The
recovery rating reflects a default scenario in which BCP is assumed
unable to refinance its debt at maturity and the recovery valuation
is based on a significant loss of volumes from low or unrated
shippers.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Fixed-Price Contracts - Revenue Risk: Midrange

Revenue risk primarily reflects the fixed-price structure of the
take-or-pay shipping contracts at Rover that are intended to
provide revenue stability through 2032. However, much revenues is
earned from shippers with weak creditworthiness or are unrated by
Fitch. In the event a shipper fails to pay commitments, Rover will
have to remarket capacity at prevailing market rates, which could
be well below contracted rates and volatile. The potential for a
longer-term reduction in demand or entry of competing pipeline
development could put downward pressure on the pricing of any
remarketed capacity.

Abundant Natural Gas - Supply Risk: Midrange

Fitch believes Rover should be able to remarket capacity based on
the fundamental economics of the Marcellus and Utica shale
production regions, particularly in the near to medium term when
Rover represents one of the only available transportation options
for the contracted shippers. Rover provides shippers with access to
multiple regions of steady industrial demand and gas storage
locations such that shipper netbacks would improve considerably
versus local markets which are oversupplied due to a lack of
takeaway capacity. The competitive position of Rover should support
full utilization of the pipeline system going forward, though
pricing could be lower than originally contracted following any
potential shipper bankruptcy or due to increased competition.

Established Operating Profile - Operation Risk: Midrange.

Operation risk is generally low based the asset's low complexity,
the use of conventional technology, and the operator's extensive
experience. Tempering the otherwise low-risk operating profile is
the lack of risk transfer from the Rover operating company to third
parties.

High Leverage and Refinance Risk - Debt Structure: Weaker.

BCP's debt structure includes high leverage, some variable interest
rate risk, and significant refinancing risk under Fitch's case. The
transaction is structured to reduce refinance risk through an
excess cash flow sweep that targets repayment of about 40% of
original debt by maturity, but the effectiveness of the reduction
will depend on strength over the debt tenor and the viability of
cash flow beyond maturity.

Financial metrics are generally robust during the term loans but
BCP's project life coverage ratio (PLCR) around the time of debt
maturity is 1.1x under rating case assumptions. The risk of
structural subordination of BCP's indebtedness to Rover is low due
to the lack of distribution covenants at Rover in conjunction with
restrictions on additional indebtedness and capital expenditure
activity at the Rover level.

Financial Profile

Annual debt service coverage ratios (DSCR) average 1.9x under
rating case conditions during the tenor of the term loans and
average 1.85x in the post-refinancing period under Fitch's
assumption that debt at maturity is refinanced in a similar
structure, reflecting the benefit of the flexible repayment profile
and the long-term value of Rover's contracts. Leverage at term loan
debt maturity in these conditions is 6.7x. Leverage does not
decline below 4.0x until 2030. Fitch estimates a PLCR of 1.1x in
late 2024 when the term loans mature, based on forecasts of cash
flow available for debt service (CFADS) through 2037, the extent of
the model for the transaction. The Rover useful asset life extends
well beyond 2037 suggesting that the PLCR may be underestimated.

PEER GROUP

Fitch has assigned ratings to comparable pipeline systems, such as
Rockies Express Pipeline, LLC (Rockies: BB+/Stable) and Ruby
Pipeline, LLC (Ruby: CCC+).

Rockies provides bidirectional gas transportation from Wyoming to
eastern Ohio with about 2.6 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) in
west-bound export capacity from the Appalachian region. Rockies has
a much larger shipper portfolio than Rover reflecting its much
larger geographical market reach, with an overall credit profile
superior to Rover's. Rockies' leverage is forecast by Fitch to be
around 4x to 5x in the 2022 to 2024 period, far below the 7x or so
level forecast for Rover in the Fitch rating case for the same
period.

Ruby's credit profile reflects a weakened market position of gas
transportation from south Oregon to southwestern Wyoming where
supply and demand dynamics are stressed due to competition from low
cost Canadian gas. Fitch expects Ruby's cash flow to decline
materially in advance of the company's large April 2022 debt
maturity, with leverage approaching around 8x at that time. Rover
will also have similarly high leverage in its 2024 refinance year
but a much stronger market position than Ruby and shipping
contracts that don't start to fall off until 2032. BCP has the
potential to rapidly de-lever under the term loans, suggesting some
capacity to improve the capital structure over time if economic
conditions are favorable and the shipper contracts remain in
force.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Increased exposure to material merchant risk following a key
    shipper bankruptcy, such that Rover is forced to remarket a
    large amount of capacity at lower-than-contracted pricing.

-- Adverse market conditions that interfere with BCP's ability to
    meet target amortization levels and/or refinance the balloon
    maturity in 2024, particularly if leverage at that time
    exceeds 10x absent mitigating factors.

-- Additional indebtedness at Rover that is not offset by an
    increase in revenue, such that cash distributions to BCP fall
    materially below base case levels.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Financial performance that indicates BCP will consistently
    meet target amortization levels.

-- Improvement in the credit quality of shipper counterparties
    such that a large majority of cash flow comes from shippers
    that have a credit profile consistent with the 'BB' category.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

BCP is a special purpose company created to finance and acquire a
minority equity interest in the Rover pipeline project, which
consists of a greenfield 713-mile interstate pipeline designed to
transport 3.425 billion cubic feet per day (bcf/d) of natural gas.
The pipeline is primarily situated in northern Ohio, extending from
the Vector Pipeline interconnection in southeastern Michigan to
Ohio's eastern border, with laterals reaching into West Virginia
and Pennsylvania. The project has contracted about 90% of the
pipeline's capacity with nine natural gas producers/shippers under
long-term take-or-pay agreements with 15-20-year terms. An
affiliate of ETP Legacy, LP is operating the project.

CREDIT UPDATE

The downward credit pressures experienced by most of Rover's
shipping counterparties over the past year have generally
stabilized. However, the creditworthiness of most of Rover's
shippers remains weak. Gulfport Energy Corp., which provides about
5% of Rover cash flow, emerged from bankruptcy in May 2021 but
continues its efforts to reject its shipping contract with Rover.
Favorably, Southwest Energy (BB/Positive) acquired Montage
Resources Corp. in May 2021, which improved the credit profile of
the approximate 6% of Rover cash flow expected from the Montage
capacity.

The significant exposure to low shipper creditworthiness is partly
mitigated by nearly all shippers having most if not all core
operations in the Marcellus and Utica regions, strong gas
production in the region and a favorable competitive position as
one of the few large export pipelines that can deliver regional
production to higher priced markets in the upper Midwest. Rover's
strong competitive position is reflected in contract and spot
volumes consistently at the maximum pipeline capacity.

The U.S. Energy Information Agency reports that Marcellus and Utica
share gas production increased 3.6% and 2.7%, respectively, for the
12-months ended Aug. 1, 2021. Most producers in the region continue
to spend significant capex to maintain or increase production.
Elevated natural gas prices in the U.S markets presently add
additional incentives for producers to continue spending
considerable sums to expand production.

Rover's competitive position continues to strengthen as potentially
competing natural gas pipelines announce development cancellations
or endure additional completion delays due to the inability to
secure environmental permits. The sponsors of the PennEast Pipeline
Co. project that was planned to export 1.1bcf/d from the Marcellus
into New Jersey has suspended development of the project in
September 2021 citing an inability to secure essential state
environmental permits. Developers of the Mountain Valley Pipeline
that is being designed to transport 2 bcf/d of shale gas from the
Marcellus and Utica region into Virginia announced in May 2021 that
the target in-service date for the pipeline was extended by over
one year, to summer 2022 due to expected delays in obtaining
necessary state permits.

Rover remains exposed to litigation involving construction related
activities, but impact, if any, is likely to be very small. The
Ohio EPA has proposed penalties of $2.6 million for alleged
violations by Rover related to spilling drilling fluids and other
pollutants into waterways. In April 2020, the Ohio Supreme Court
took up the case for review but oral arguments have yet to be
scheduled. FERC is also investigating Rover's demolition of a
house, the Stoneman House, a potential historic structure,
allegedly without approval and notification to FERC. In March 2021,
FERC issued a directive to Rover and Energy Transfer Partners,
L.P.(ETP) to show cause why they should not be assessed civil
penalties for the alleged unauthorized demolition of the Stoneman
House. Rover and ETP responded but the matter remains unresolved.

Rover's distributions were in line with Fitch's rating case
forecast in 2020 but well above in the first half of 2021.
Performance in 2020 was negatively affected by lower short-term and
spot volumes for a portion of the year due to COVID-19 impact.
Those volumes improved in most of 2021. Pipeline volumes are
essentially at capacity. For 2020, Fitch estimates a DSCR of 2.0x
for BCP compared to the rating case forecast of 1.44x, the
differential due to lower than forecast interest expense for the
period. For the first half of 2021, Rover's distributions were
about 34% above Fitch's rating case forecast.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

In its base case, Fitch assumes current levels of contract,
short-term, and spot volumes through term loan maturity in Oct
2024, reflecting actual performance along with expectations of
favorable market conditions over the near term. After October 2024,
Fitch applies a 10% reduction through 2037 to volumes associated
with short-term and spot sales and to all volumes associated with
shippers that are rated below 'BB-' or unrated by Fitch. The
post-maturity reduction to volume sales recognizes the potential
for one or more shipper bankruptcies and inability to remarket lost
volumes fully due to competitiveness issues. The case also assumes
an effective extension of the term facility and the high cash sweep
at an all-in average interest rate of 8%. DSCRs average 2.1x during
the tenor of the term loan facility and 2.0x post-refinancing. At
term loan refinance, leverage is 5.6x and the PLCR based on revenue
through late 2037 is about 1.3x at an 8% discount rate.

Fitch's rating case further stresses the base case assumptions by
increasing O&M costs by 10% and adding another 5% haircut through
2037 to volumes associated with short-term and spot sales and to
all volumes associated with shippers that are rated below 'BB-' or
are unrated by Fitch. DSCRs average 1.9x during the tenor of the
term loan and average 1.8x in the post-refinancing period,
reflecting the benefit of the flexible repayment profile and the
long-term value of Rover's contracts. At term loan refinance,
leverage is 8x and the PLCR based on revenue through late 2037 is
about 1.1x at an 8% discount rate.

Recovery

Given the completion and strong market performance of Rover and
continued strong growth in production on natural gas from the
Marcellus, the recovery scenario is primarily that Rover
experiences a permanent 30% reduction in volumes from shippers
rated below the 'BB' category or are unrated and from spot sales.
In this scenario, default is assumed to occur at maturity in 2024
when the debt service reserve is exhausted. EBITDA (or rather,
distributed cash from Rover to BCP) is about $85 million, giving an
enterprise value (EV) of $680 million (versus BCP's approximate $2
billion share of the Rover $6 billion capital outlay) based on an
8x EBITDA multiple. Total value for lenders in EV less 10% for
administrative claims, or $611 million. This value provides a 70%
return on the $872 million in term loan debt outstanding at
maturity in this scenario.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

The highest level of ESG credit relevance, if present, is a score
of 3. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a
minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or
to the way in which they are being managed by the entity.


BEAR COMMUNICATIONS: Dentons Represents Creditors Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firms of Dentons Bingham Greenebaum LLP and Dentons US LLP
submitted a verified statement to disclose that they are
representing the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the
Chapter 11 cases of Bear Communications, LLC.

As of Nov. 3, 2021, each of the Committee members and their
disclosable economic interests are:

Advance Business Capital, LLC
d/b/a Triumph Business Capital
651 Canyon Drive, Suite 105
Coppell, TX 75019

* Proof of Claim No. 69-1, asserting claim in the amount of
  $4,311,662.82

Erica Burnette
c/o Trey J. Malbrough
P.O. Box 531383
Birmingham, AL 35253

* Proof of Claim No. 133-1, asserting claim in the amount of
  $250,000.00

Eagle Capital Corp.
P.O. Box 4215
Tupelo, MS 38803

* Proof of Claim No. 18-1, asserting claim in the amount of
  $93552.87

KLJ Engineering, LLC
f/k/a Kadrmas, Lee & Jackson, Inc.
4585 Coleman St.
Bismarck, ND 58503

* Proof of Claim No. 80-1, asserting claim in unstated amount but
  Scheduled claim in the amount of $1,213,333.67

Poblocki Paving Corp.
525 S. 116th St.
West Allis, WI 53214

* Proof of Claim No. 79-1, asserting claim in the amount of
  $550,000.00

RC Underground, LLC
6421 Key Island Ave.
Apollo Beach, FL 33572

* Proof of Claim No. 82-1, asserting claim in the amount of
  $318,318.25

Verizon Sourcing, LLC
One Verizon Way
Mail Stop: 54S097A
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

* Proofs of Claim Nos. 135-1, 136-1, 137-1 and 138-1, asserting
  claim in an amount not less than $61,307,782.21

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2019(c)(2)(B), as of the date of
formation of the Committee, each of the Committee members holds a
Claim against the Debtor arising from the Debtor's failure to pay
for certain goods or services, or for tort liability. As of the
date of this filing, the exact amount of each of these Claims is
unknown or disputed. Further, the Debtor has asserted its own Claim
against at least one of the Committee members, Verizon Sourcing,
LLC, which Verizon contests. These Claims, however, are the only
economic interest held in relation to the Debtor.

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors can be
reached at:

          James R. Irving, Esq.
          Christopher B. Madden, Esq.
          DENTONS BINGHAM GREENEBAUM LLP
          3500 PNC Tower
          101 S. Fifth Street
          Louisville, Kentucky 40202
          Tel.: (502) 589-3606
          E-mail: james.irving@dentons.com
                  chris.madden@dentons.com

             - and -

          Robert Hammeke, Esq.
          DENTONS US LLP
          4520 Main Street, Suite 1100
          Kansas City, MO 64111
          Tel.: (816) 460-2457
          E-mail: robert.hammeke@dentons.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://bit.ly/3o3eobV and https://bit.ly/3o3BGhX

                    About Bear Communications

Lawrence, Kansas-based Bear Communications, LLC --
http://www.bearcommunications.net-- is a communications contractor
offering aerial construction, underground construction, splicing,
subscriber drop placement, residential and commercial
installations, residential and commercial wiring, consulting, and
testing services.

Bear Communications filed its voluntary petition for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Kansas Case No. 21-10495) on May 28, 2021,
disclosing total assets of up to $50 million and total liabilities
of up to $100 million.  Judge Dale L. Somers presides over the
case.

W. Thomas Gilman, Esq., at Hinkle Law Firm LLC, represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 20 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case on June 29, 2021.  The
committee is represented by Robert Hammeke, Esq., at Dentons US
LLP.


BEAR VALLEY RANCH: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 30
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
has authorized Bear Valley Ranch Market & Liquor Inc. to use cash
collateral on a final basis in accordance with the budget, with a
10% variance through and including November 30, 2021.

All parties asserting a lien or interest against the cash
collateral are granted a replacement lien on all postpetition
property of the Debtor, to the same extent, validity and priority
existing as of the Petition Date -- except for causes of action --
for the diminution in the value of lien or interest as of the
Petition Date.

A copy of the order is available for free at https://bit.ly/3o5fggc
from PacerMonitor.com.

              About Bear Valley Ranch Market & Liquor

Bear Valley Ranch Market & Liquor Inc. owns and operates a single
market and liquor store located at 32475 Clinton Keith Road, Suite
111-112, Wildomar, Calif.

Bear Valley Ranch filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 21-14536) on Aug. 24, 2021, listing as
much as $500,000 in both assets and liabilities.  Salam Haddad,
president of Bear Valley Ranch, signed the petition.  

Judge Mark Houle oversees the case.  

The Law Offices of J. Luke Hendrix serves as the Debtor's legal
counsel.



BOOZ ALLEN: Moody's Hikes Rating on Sr. Unsecured Notes From Ba2
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded the senior unsecured rating
of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. ("BAH" or the "company") to Baa3 from
Ba2 and upgraded the senior secured rating to Baa2 from Baa3.
Concurrently, the former Ba1 corporate family rating and Ba1-PD
probability of default rating have been withdrawn, along with the
former SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating. The rating outlook
is stable.

The ratings upgrade reflects the strong continued track record of
execution and organic growth, which has resulted in a company with
about $8 billion of revenue and increasing importance within the US
federal services market. A total backlog of $29 billion, which has
grown 80% since FY2018, will support continued strong growth. The
upgrade was also prompted by the company's articulation of a
financial strategy that Moody's believes will support an investment
grade profile while allowing for acquisitions that will further
strengthen the company's technical capabilities and competitive
position. Moody's also believes that risks around some of the
company's Department of Justice and SEC investigations are receding
and that any potential monetary penalties could easily be absorbed
within the company's current liquidity. The upgrade also reflects
Moody's view that, over time, BAH's capital structure will evolve
such that secured debt will represent a diminishing part of total
debt.

Upgrades:

Issuer: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, Upgraded to Baa2 from Baa3
(LGD2)

Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Upgraded to
Baa2 from Baa3 (LGD2)

Senior Unsecured Notes, Upgraded to Baa3 from Ba2 (LGD5)

Withdrawals:

Issuer: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated
Ba1-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated
SGL-1

Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn , previously rated Ba1

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings reflect BAH's significant scale at nearly $8 billion of
revenue, with good contract diversity and a strong contract
execution track record. Unlike many of its competitors, BAH's
growth in recent years has been organic, notably outpacing federal
budgetary growth. Solid contract execution standards along with
BAH's increasingly specialized workforce and internal technology
investments have driven market share gains. The rating is also
supported by Moody's expectation of annual free cash flow (after
dividends) in the $300 to $400 million range and interest coverage
(EBITDA-capex/interest expense) in excess of 9.0x.

The company's recently announced plans to complement organic growth
with acquisition spending will further BAH's already strong place
in the market. The company will focus on acquisitions that help the
government advance technologically, rather than on acquisitions
that simply add scale. BAH publicly articulated that, while it will
deploy capital for share repurchases, dividends and acquisitions,
it will abide by a maximum net leverage target of 3.5x. Moody's
believes that bolt-on to medium sized acquisitions are more likely
than transformational large-sized M&A deals as the company intends
to preserve its organizational culture.

The ratings are constrained by the company's concentration of
revenues in US defense/intelligence communities, with 70% revenue
derived from these customers. This makes BAH vulnerable to changing
US budgetary priorities or persistent budgetary pressures. Risks
inherent in the business also include litigation or reputational
harm that could arise from cyber or other security breaches.
Following negative publicity related to rogue employees in recent
years, BAH has emphasized employee related controls in its
operating practices. Governance related to compliance with
government contracting protocols will remain critical for bid
qualifications.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's assumption that BAH will
maintain its strong scale and business position within the US
defense/federal contracting market while maintaining measured
financial policies.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Upward rating momentum would depend on continuing growth, reduced
dependence on US defense/intelligence agency communities, EBITDA
margin close to 12% and strong backlog trends. A significantly
reduced proportion of secured debt in the capital structure, along
with debt/EBITDA maintained below 3.0x could also support an
upgrade.

A significant reduction in government spending that leads to
meaningfully reduced backlog, contract execution problems or rising
litigation exposure could lead to a downgrade. A financial policy
that leads to leverage above the company's current stated maximum,
weakening of liquidity or acquisitions that lead to operational
disruption could also cause downward rating pressure.

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. is a provider of management and technology
consulting and engineering services to governments in the defense,
intelligence and civil markets, global corporations and
not-for-profit organizations. Booz Allen Hamilton is headquartered
in McLean, VA and reported revenues of approximately $8 billion for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Aerospace and
Defense published in October 2021.


BOSTON DONUTS: Gets Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 18
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts has
authorized Boston Donuts, Inc. and its affiliates to continue using
cash collateral on the same terms and conditions as set forth in
the Eleventh Order Authorizing the Use of Cash Collateral through
November 18, 2021, the date of the hearing.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the
Debtors was permitted to use cash collateral solely up to the
amounts stated for any line item for the purposes identified in the
Budget, with a 10% variance or as expressly consented to in advance
in writing by the Secured Parties, with notice to the US Trustee.

Hometown Bank, Quickstone Capital, and the Massachusetts Department
of Revenue (MDOR) were granted a continuing post-petition
replacement lien and security interest in all post-petition
property of the estate of the same type against which they held
validly perfected liens and security interest as of the Petition
Date. The Replacement Liens will maintain the same priority,
validity and enforceability as the liens on the collateral and will
be recognized only to the extent of any diminution in the value of
the collateral.

The November 18 hearing will be conducted by telephone at 1:30
p.m.

Objections to the continued use of cash collateral will be filed no
later than November 16 at 4:30 p.m.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3GVSTlM from
PacerMonitor.com.

                     About Boston Donuts, Inc.

Boston Donuts, Inc., generates revenues by manufacturing and
selling donuts.  The Company sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Lead Case No. 19-41141) on July 11, 2019, along with its
debtor-affiliates Costa Cafe Inc., Maple Avenue Donuts, Inc., W&E
Trust, Inc., and EOR Holding Corporation.  Their cases are jointly
administered.

Judge Christopher J. Panos oversees the case.

James P. Ehrhard, Esq., at Ehrhard & Associates, P.C., represents
the Debtors as counsel.



BVF FUND II: Unsecured Creditors Will Get 100% of Claims in Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
BVF Fund II, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas a Plan of Reorganization for Small
Business dated October 29, 2021.

Debtor is a Texas Limited Liability Company which was formed in
June, 2016. The Debtor was established with a business model of
investing in litigation support receivables for storm damage
insurance claims.

This case was filed, in part, to obtain an extension of limitation
periods, and to assist the Debtor in reorganizing, and to ensure
the business continues to operate in a matter that maximizes the
return of the remaining members' investments.  

The Debtor's financial projections show that the Debtor will have
projected disposable income of $1,543,725.60. The final Plan
payment is expected to be paid on or before September 30, 2026.

This Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay creditors of BVF Fund
II, LLC from an infusion of capital, the pursuit and liquidation of
certain contingent claims, collection of accounts receivable, cash
flow from the operations of the company and future income.

It is estimated that non-priority unsecured creditors holding
allowed claims will receive distributions, which the proponent of
this Plan has valued at approximately 100 cents on the dollar based
upon an estimate of the value of the claims owned by the Debtor.
The actual payout less depending upon the success in recovering
upon contingent claims owned by the Debtor and the administrative
costs involved. This Plan also provides for the payment of
administrative and priority claims.

Class 1 consists of Allowed Unsecured Claims held by noninsiders
[Objecting Members, whose claims are the subject of Adversary No.
21-5098 RBK, and other Allowed Unsecured claims under § 502 of the
Code held by noninsiders]. The Allowed Unsecured Claims held by
noninsiders shall be treated as follows:

     * For Allowed Unsecured Claims held by Objecting Members: (A).
Within 10 business days of the Effective Date, Debtor's Manager
shall execute promissory notes payable to each of the Objecting
Members in the amount of their original investment ($100,000 each)
plus a pro rata share of the portion of each Objecting Member's
proof of claim attributable to their portion of the total
attorney's fees and costs of court incurred prior to the Petition
Date; (B). Each Objecting Member shall be deemed to have forfeited
their Membership interests in the Debtor in exchange for the
promissory notes; (C).

     * For other holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims: Debtor shall
pay the Allowed Unsecured Claims of other non-insiders on a pro
rata basis at the same time distributions are made on the Allowed
Unsecured Claims held by Objecting Members.

     * The Allowed Unsecured Claims held by noninsiders shall be
paid as follows: After payment of any Allowed Administrative and
Priority Claims, payments from the Creditors' Trust shall be paid
first to satisfy the Allowed Claims of Class 1 Creditors. All such
payments shall be paid at the discretion of the Trustee in the
amounts and at the time intervals the Trustee decides, or as may be
ordered by the Court.

Class 2 consists of Allowed Unsecured Claim of Debtor's Manager –
an Insider. The Allowed Unsecured Claim of Debtor's Manager shall
be paid in full only after all Allowed Claims in Class 1 are paid
in full, and as funds may be available from the Creditor Trust.

Class 3 consists of Equity Members of the Debtor. All Equity
Members other than the Objecting Members (hereinafter referred to
as "the Majority Members") shall retain their membership interests
in the Reorganized Debtor. Further, the membership interests of the
Objecting Members shall be divided and allocated among the Majority
Members on a pro rata basis to increase their membership interests
in the Debtor accordingly.

Estimated Percentage of Claims Which Unsecured Creditors Would
Receive or Retain in a Chapter 7 Liquidation (depending on size of
unsecured creditor pool in a Ch. 7 case and assuming no additional
recovery on Contingent claims) is 37% or 9.6%.

Estimated Percentage of Claims Which Unsecured Creditors Will
Receive or Retain under the Plan is 100%.

The Plan will be implemented as follows:

   * Within 15 days of the Effective Date, Debtor's manager shall
contribute the following assets to facilitate the implementation of
the Plan:

     -- A cash contribution of $25,000 to the Debtor's operating
account, for use as working capital for the Debtor's future
operations;

     -- To the Creditor Trust, all liens held by Buena Vista
Finance, LLC, on all outstanding Public Adjuster fees which were
due to Correct Claim Public Adjusters, LLC, matters involving the
Debtor;

     -- A 40% equity interest in the entity known as Pre Litigation
Support Services, LLC – a Texas Limited Liability Company which
is presently operating and handling storm damage claims. Such
interest shall be divided pro rata among the Debtor's members
holding membership interests after confirmation, and after the
adjustment in membership interests occurring as a result of the
reallocation of membership interests.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated October 29,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3EJ7rTT from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

     H. Anthony Hervol, Esq.
     Law Office of H. Anthony Hervol
     4414 Centerview Drive, Suite 207
     San Antonio, TX 78228
     Telephone: (210) 522-9500
     Facsimile: (210) 522-0205
     Email: hervol@sbcglobal.net

                         About BVF Fund II

BVF Fund II, LLC filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Case No.
21-50951) on July 31, 2021, listing as much as $1 million in both
assets and liabilities.  David Komet, authorized representative,
signed the petition. Judge Craig A. Gargotta oversees the case.  H.
Anthony Hervol, Esq., serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


CANACOL ENERGY: Moody's Hikes CFR & Senior Unsecured Notes to Ba3
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Canacol Energy Ltd.'s corporate
family rating to Ba3 from B1. The senior unsecured rating on its
existing notes was also upgraded to Ba3 from B1. The outlook on the
ratings is stable.

Upgrades:

Issuer: Canacol Energy Ltd.

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to Ba3 from B1

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Upgraded to Ba3 from B1

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Canacol Energy Ltd.

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The upgrade on Canacol's rating to Ba3 was based on the company's
positive operating and financial track record since 2018 regarding
production and credit metrics. Canacol's Ba3 rating reflects the
company's small production and reserves size, which is balanced by
stable and predictable cash flow, derived from contracted sales
with solid fixed prices that reduce volume and commodity price
risk. Operating margins are solid due to Canacol's low-cost
operating structure, which supports stable operating netback.

Canacol currently has access to 230 mmcf per day of pipeline
capacity. In the first six months of 2021, its production of
natural gas reached about 176,000 Mscfpd (30,000 Mboed), a volume
that will increase materially in the next few years as the company
steps up capital investments in exploration and production of
natural gas. Canacol has limited volume and price risk since about
80% of the company's sales are secured through long-term
take-or-pay contracts that have an average weighted life of six
years. In addition, prices are 80% fixed in the contractual period
at profitable levels, resulting in stable EBITDA margins of about
78%.

Canacol's production comes mostly from a prolific area in Colombia,
Lower Magdalena Valley basin. In addition, its proved reserve life
is adequate at over six years and management is committed to
replacing reserves at an annual rate of 100-120%. The company's
business model is based on continued production and reserves growth
through a combination of exploration and property development.

Canacol has adequate liquidity. Cash and equivalents of $35 million
as of June 2021 plus $208 million in cash from operations that
Moody's expect from July 2021 to December 2022 are enough to fund
Canacol's capital spending program of about $130 million as well as
interest expenses and dividends of $30 million each, in the same
period. Moreover, the company's debt maturity profile is
comfortable because no major debt matures before 2025. Canacol has
a $46 million committed revolver that matures in 2023.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Canacol
will be able to continue to increase production and reserves as
planned. The stable outlook also assumes that management will
maintain solid financial policies.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Canacol's Ba3 ratings could be upgraded if it manages to increase
production closer to 100 MMboed and to raise its reserve size
efficiently, with minimal deterioration in financial metrics.
Quantitatively, an upgrade would require that its leveraged
full-cycle ratio, which measures an oil company's ability to
generate cash after operating, financial and reserve replacement
costs, is consistently above 2.5 times for a sustained period.

Canacol's Ba3 ratings could be downgraded if retained cash flow
(funds from operations less dividends) to total debt declines to
below 30%, or if its interest coverage, as per EBITDA to interest
expense, falls to below 4.5 times with limited prospects of a quick
turnaround. In addition, a deterioration of the company's liquidity
profile could lead to a negative rating action.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production published in August 2021.

Canacol, with headquarters in Alberta, Canada, is an independent
natural gas & oil exploration and production company in Colombia.
As of June 2021, its total assets amounted to $696 million.


CARVANA CO: Incurs $68 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------
Carvana Co. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $68 million
on $3.48 billion of net sales and operating revenue for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2021, compared to a net loss of $18 million
on $1.54 billion of net sales and operating revenue for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $105 million on $9.06 billion of net sales and
operating revenues compared to a net loss of $308 million on $3.76
billion of net sales and operating revenues for the same period
during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $5.36 billion in total
assets, $4.65 billion in total liabilities, and $708 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"The third quarter was another great quarter for Carvana.  We
delivered over 110,000 cars to our customers growing 74% vs a year
ago and continued laying the foundations necessary to sell over 2
million cars per year," said Ernie Garcia, founder and CEO of
Carvana.  "Despite the complexities of managing through all the
change of the last 2 years, our team has continually executed and
persevered as we bought and sold over 3x as many cars from our
customers in the third quarter as we did in the third quarter of
2019.  Thank you to our entire team for all the effort and care
these accomplishments have required."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001690820/000169082021000310/cvna-20210930.htm

                           About Carvana

Founded in 2012 and based in Tempe, Arizona, Carvana Co. --
http://www.carvana.com-- is a holding company that was formed as
a
Delaware corporation on Nov. 29, 2016.  Carvana is an e-commerce
platform for buying and selling used cars.  The Company owns and
operates Carvana.com, which enables consumers to quickly and easily
shop vehicles, finance, trade-in or sell the ir current vehicle to
Carvana, sign contracts, and schedule as-soon-as-next-day delivery
or pickup at one of Carvana's patented, automated Car Vending
Machines.

                            *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on May 24, 2021, S&P Global Ratings revised
its ratings outlook to positive from stable and affirmed its 'CCC+'
issuer credit rating on online used-car retailer Carvana Co.  "The
positive outlook indicates that we could raise the ratings on
Carvana if the company continues to make progress in leveraging its
scale to improve margins such that it can achieve near breakeven
EBITDA while maintaining sufficient liquidity to pay for its cash
burn for at least 18 months," S&P said.


CAUSE TECH: Unsecureds Will Get 20% of Claims in 60 Months
----------------------------------------------------------
Cause Tech LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida a First Amended Plan of Reorganization
dated October 29, 2021.

Debtor was incorporated as Big Couch Holdings, LLC on March 29,
2016. Its name was changed to Cause Tech LLC in 2019 by Amendment
to the Articles of Incorporation, filed with the state of Florida.
The company is operated by its managing member, Albert Clay
Williams.

Class I consists of Wells Fargo, Claim #2 (Impaired). Claim #2, in
the amount of $321,973.78 is owed to Wells Fargo, as evidenced by
the Note (the "Note"). The obligation is unsecured as to the
Debtor, but it is fully secured by a Mortgage with a third position
lien on the Williams' residence (the "Mortgage"). The Mortgage
secures only the Note comprising claim #2. It does not
crosscollateralize any other obligation. The Note matures June 21,
2026. The Note's interest rate is fixed at 5.90%.

Debtor will pay Claim# 2 in full, with interest at the contractual
rate, plus reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the extent
provided for in the Note. The Note is modified only to alter the
timing and amount of the monthly payment obligations, permitting
the Debtor to pay the outstanding balance in full over the
remaining term of the Note, and to eliminate certain default
provisions.

Commencing with the first payment on the effective date, Debtor
will pay 100% of the principal balance of the Note ($313,990.20) in
regular monthly installments, with interest at 5.9%, amortized from
the effective date through June 21, 2026. Accrued pre-petition
interest of $7,923.58, post-petition interest at 5.9%, and allowed
attorney's fees will be paid in full, on or before June 21, 2026,
separately from the regular monthly installments of principal and
interest. If the Plan is confirmed on a nonconsensual basis, the
Subchapter V trustee will make all such payments in accordance with
Section 6.

Class II consists of General Unsecured Creditors (Impaired). The
Debtor shall pay monthly, commencing with the first payment on the
effective date. Claimants will be paid 20% of their allowed claims
in regular monthly installments over 60 months. If the Plan is
confirmed on a nonconsensual basis, the Subchapter V trustee will
make all such payments in accordance with Section 6. If the Debtor
incurs administrative claims that must be paid out over the term of
the Plan, these payments will not impact the payments to unsecured
creditors.

Class III consists of Equity Holders (Unimpaired). The Debtor's
equity interest holders include Albert Clay and Mariana Williams
(jointly 97.84%), Georgianne Brown (1.08%) and John Studdard
(1.08%). The existing equity holders will retain their interest and
are unimpaired. Equity Holder Albert Clay and Mariana Williams will
submit $20,000 of new value to fund the Debtor's obligations under
the Plan.

The Debtor has the capacity to apply its net disposable income for
5 years toward a payment to its creditors, or if necessary, to the
supervision and control of the Subchapter V trustee for execution
of the Plan.

Additionally, the Debtors' principals, Albert Clay Williams and
Mariana Williams shall contribute $20,000 as new value to fund the
Debtors' initial obligations under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Plan of Reorganization dated
October 29, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3mKGhWQ from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                      About Cause Tech LLC

Cause Tech, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-13201) on April 1,
2021.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of
between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of between $500,001
and $1 million.

The Debtor is represented by the Law Offices of Malinda L. Hayes.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as lender is represented by Dana L. Kaplan.


CHG PPC: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of CHG PPC Parent
LLC ("C.H. Guenther") including its Corporate Family Rating at B2
and, its Probability of Default Rating at B2-PD. Moody's upgraded
C.H. Guenther's existing EUR190 million senior secured term loan
due 2025 to B1 from B2 and assigned a B1 rating to a proposed $250
million first lien revolver due 2026 and a proposed $910 million
first lien term loan due 2028. The outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the proposed issuance will be used to refinance C.H.
Guenther's $125 million first lien revolver due 2023 and $675
million first lien term loan due 2025, both currently rated B2, in
addition to its $175 million second lien term loan due 2023 that is
not rated. The refinancing is in connection with a minority equity
recapitalization of the company. Moody's took no action on the B2
ratings on the existing $125 million first lien revolver due 2023
and the existing $675 million first lien term loan due 2025 and
will withdraw the ratings once the facility and term loan are
repaid as part of the proposed transaction.

The transactions are credit negative because they will result in an
approximate $370 million (roughly 34%) increase in debt to fund a
buyout of certain minority investors. Debt-to-EBITDA leverage
increases to approximately 6.7x from 5.1x as a result of the
transaction. Moody's nevertheless affirmed the B2 CFR because C.H.
Guenther continues to generate good free cash flow and maintain
good liquidity. In addition, Moody's projects earnings growth, debt
repayment and the earnings from a proposed acquisition funded from
cash will reduce debt-to-EBITDA to a low 6x range by the end of
2021.

The upgrade of the EUR190 million senior secured term loan due 2025
to B1 from B2 and assignment of the B1 senior secured first lien
ratings reflects the increase in the mix of second lien debt in the
capital structure. The mix change increases the loss-asorption
cushion and relative recovery prospects of the first lien debt.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by the action:

Ratings Affirmed:

Issuer: CHG PPC Parent LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed at B2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed at B2-PD

Ratings Upgraded:

Issuer: CHG PPC Parent LLC

GTD Senior Secured Term Loan (Euro denominated), Upgraded to B1
(LGD3) from B2 (LGD3)

New Assignments:

Issuer: CHG PPC Parent LLC

GTD Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

GTD Senior Secured 1st Lien Multi-Currency Revolving Credit
Facility, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: CHG PPC Parent LLC

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

C. H. Guenther's B2 CFR reflects its high, but manageable financial
leverage, acquisitive growth strategy, and low organic sales
growth. The credit profile is supported by good product and
geographic diversity, stable product demand, low earnings and cash
flow volatility, and good liquidity. C.H. Guenther was negatively
affected by the coronavirus pandemic, as the company generates 70%
of its sales through food service channels, both quick-serve and
casual dining restaurants. The company was able to partially offset
the weakness in its food service channel through growth in its
retail business and cost reductions. Revenue and earnings are
rebounding because food service volume is recovering and Moody's
projects mid-to-low single digit revenue and earnings growth over
the next 12 months. Moody's projects C.H. Guenther will generate
approximately $70 million of free cash flow in fiscal March 2022
and somewhat lower free cash flow in a $50 million range in fiscal
2023 because capacity expansions will increase capital spending.
Moody's expects financial policies to be aggressive under
investment fund ownership, as evidenced by the incremental debt
being used to help fund the proposed equity transaction.

Moody's expects C.H. Guenther to operate with good liquidity based
on $172 million of cash as of June 2021, prior to the use of a
substantial portion of the existing cash balance for a pending
acquisition of three manufacturing facilities, approximately $50-70
million in free cash flow in Fiscal 2022 and Fiscal 2023, full
availability on an undrawn $250 million first lien revolver, and no
meaningful maturities through 2024 aside from approximately $9.1
million of required annual term loan amortization.

The coronavirus outbreak and the government measures put in place
to contain it continue to disrupt economies and credit markets
across sectors and regions. Although an economic recovery is
underway, it is tenuous, and its continuation will be closely tied
to containment of the virus. As a result, there is uncertainty
around Moody's forecasts. Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak
as a social risk under its ESG framework, given the substantial
implications for public health and safety. Notwithstanding, C.H.
Guenther and many other packaged food companies are likely to be
more resilient than companies in other sectors, although some
volatility can be expected through 2022 due to uncertain demand
characteristics, channel shifting, and the potential for supply
chain disruptions and difficult comparisons following these
shifts.

Governance risk includes C.H. Guenther's financial strategies,
which Moody's views as aggressive given its high financial
leverage, private equity ownership and focus on growth through
acquisitions that can lead to increased debt and integration
risks.

The company is moderately exposed to environmental risks that
include land, water, raw materials, and energy usage as well as
packaging and waste. C.H. Guenther also relies on agricultural
products that utilize water and fertilizers, and are subject to
volatility and disruptions related to weather, seasonality and land
preservation. Rising costs to meet environmental standards and
consumer preferences would likely be at least partially passed on
to consumers, but could be significant.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The stable outlook incorporates Moody's expectation that C.H.
Guenther will successfully integrate its recent acquisition of
three manufacturing facilities and that pro-forma financial
leverage will decline to a low 6.0x range in the next 12 to 18
months. Furthermore, Moody's assumes in the outlook that C.H.
Guenther will organically grow its revenues and EBITDA, continue to
expand the company through acquisitions, and generate comfortably
positive free cash flow of at least $45 million.

The ratings could be upgraded if there is a meaningful increase in
scale, the company successfully manages acquisition led growth and
debt/EBITDA approaches 5.0x.

The ratings could be downgraded if profitability declines
significantly, the company encounters integration challenges
following an acquisition, liquidity deteriorates, or debt/EBITDA is
sustained above 6.5x. The ratings could also be downgrade if free
cash flow sustainably deteriorates.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.

CHG PPC Parent LLC is the owner of San Antonio, TX based C.H.
Guenther & Son. The company produces a broad set of grain-based and
seasoning products, including artisan breads, buns, rolls,
biscuits, dough, desserts, gravy mixes, spices, frozen appetizers,
and frozen snacks. C.H. Guenther & Son is indirectly owned by
investors led by the private capital firm Pritzker Private Capital.



CONWAY COURT: Gets Interim Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 30
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts has
authorized Conway Court 1 LLC and affiliates to use cash collateral
on an interim basis through November 30, 2021. The Debtors are
authorized to expend funds in the amounts consistent with the
budget.

On an ongoing basis, the Debtors are directed to deposit all rental
income received and make expense payments from the established DIP
Account.

By the 21st day of each month, the Debtors will file a
reconciliation of budgeted to actual receipts and disbursements for
the previous month.

U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for Velocity Commercial
Capital Loan Trust 2018-2 is granted replacement liens and security
interests in the same types and kinds of the Debtors' property
arising, acquired or created on or after October 21, 2021 in which
the Bank holds pre-petition liens and security interests and such
replacement liens and security interests will extend to the
proceeds and products of such post-petition property purchased or
acquired with cash  collateral.

The Bank will have a superpriority claim pursuant to Bankruptcy
Code section 507(b) to the extent of the use of cash collateral and
any other diminution in value of the Bank's collateral on and after
the Petition Date that is not replaced by this replacement lien and
security interest.

The liens, mortgages and security interests granted to the Bank in
the post-petition collateral pursuant to the Order will be deemed
effective, valid and perfected, ex post facto to the Petition
Date.

A hearing regarding authority for continued use of cash collateral
is scheduled for November 30 at 11 a.m. and will be held
telephonically.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3BVkb85 from
PacerMonitor.com.

                         About Conway Court

Lincoln, Mass.-based Conway Court 1, LLC filed a petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 21-11533) on Oct.
21, 2021, listing up to $10 million in assets and up to $1 million
in liabilities.  Lou Makrigiannis, manager, signed the petition.

Judge Frank J. Bailey oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Michael Van Dam, Esq., at Van Dam Law, LLP as
legal counsel.



CPESAZ LIQUIDATING: Hawkins, Scott Represent CPES Claimants
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of CPESAZ Liquidating, Inc., f/k/a
Community Provider of Enrichment Services, Inc., the law firms of
Hawkins Parnell & Young LLP and Scott McNutt submitted a verified
statement under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure, to disclose that they are representing Bob Bennetti,
Linki Peddy, Linda Mariano, Chip Foust, and in excess of 92 other
CPES Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Participants.

In late April, 2020, almost immediately upon learning of the April
24, 2020, filing of the first two Petitions herein, the four named
Individual CPES ESOP Participants contacted Hawkins Parnell out of
surprise that this proceeding was filed and the fear – now
realized – that their retirement accounts would be wasted by
these proceedings. Many other CPES ESOP participants had been in
contact with the four named Participants and, as of counsel's
initial appearance herein on June 6, 2020 [ECF No. 169],
approximately forty more participants had expressed their concerns
and retained Counsel. That number grew.

Counsel have formal written engagement agreements with 94
individual CPES ESOP participants. The four named Individual CPES
ESOP Participants executed engagement agreements with Hawkins
Parnell. All of the other participants each reviewed those
engagement agreements, including the applicable conflict of
interest and arbitration provisions, and the Addendum attached
thereto. 89 of the 92 previously unnamed other Individual CPES ESOP
participants executed an Addendum authorizing their retention of
counsel. Two of the three participants who did not return their
executed Addendum nonetheless authorized in writing the timely
filing of their proof of claim on or about September 30, 2020; the
other previously unnamed participant authorized the filing of a
declaration in support of the Individual CPES ESOP Participants'
Motion for Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee or, in the
Alternative, to Convert to Chapter 7.

On or about September 30, 2020, Counsel filed 94 proofs of claim in
the main proceeding. Each proof of claim included (i) the name of
the claimant, (ii) the amount of their individual claim based upon
their then-latest received CPES ESOP participant statement as of
December 31, 2018, (iii) their assertion of class claims on behalf
of the CPES ESOP, and (iv) a copy of their CPES ESOP participant
statement, which includes their address. While the claims
themselves have been sealed from public view, this information is
known to Faegre Drinker, the Debtors, and now the Liquidating
Trustee. These proofs of claim include the named Individual CPES
ESOP Participants. A complete list of the Individual CPES ESOP
Participants is included in the accompanying chart.

Under the terms of engagement, the Individual CPES ESOP
Participants have cumulatively paid about $10,000 in advance to be
applied to a varying contingency or success fee of amounts that
counsel is able to recover for the CPES ESOP apart from any amounts
either otherwise set forth in the proofs of claim, as unsecured
creditors, or as part of the residual estate in this proceeding.
Counsel is not otherwise being paid for monitoring this proceeding,
the filings made and positions taken herein to protect the CPES
ESOP Participants, and have not sought compensation via the filing
of administrative expense claims herein. Counsel have not otherwise
been compensated for the costs incurred herein or with respect to
the appeal herein. Counsel will provide a representative copy of
their engagement agreement and the addendum to this Court in camera
if necessary.

The nature and amount of each disclosable economic interest held in
relation to the Debtors by each Individual CPES ESOP Participant is
based upon their 100% vested interest in the CPES ESOP, as of
December 31, 2018, and is set forth in their respective Individual
CPES ESOP Participant statements. This information also is included
in the accompanying chart.

As noted in the accompanying chart, Counsel also have updated the
addresses for certain of the participants, based upon the
information Counsel received as of September 30, 2020.

Aleu Aleu
730 W. Vogel, Apt. 207
Phoenix, AZ 85021

* Number of Shares: 349.29556
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 110; NLS 263

Almira Caen
14625 S Mountain Pkwy.
Apt. 1046
Phoenix, AZ 85044

* Number of Shares: 681.49880
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 98; NLS 217

Ann Marie Johnson
2311 E. Madelyn Circle
Tucson, AZ 85712

* Number of Shares: 2,819.56570
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 109; NLS 270

Annette Carr
520 N. Desert Strav.
Tucson, AZ 85711

* Number of Shares: 5,236.87578
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 107; NLS 229

Anthony Cameron
2902 E. Drachman Street
Tucson, AZ 85716

* Number of Shares: 444.51629
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 105; NLS 225

Antonio Stetler
1323 W. 10th Pl.
Tempe, AZ 85281

* Number of Shares: 4,175.43617
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 102; NLS 227

Araceli C. Ramirez de Perez
14320 N. 19th Ave., Apt. 207
Phoenix, AZ 85023

* Number of Shares: 4,493.61650
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 83; NLS 220

Arvis Barnes
1917 W. Hemingway Lane
Anthem, AZ 85086

* Number of Shares: 1,185.29720
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 88; NLS 223

Ashia Gilmore
9999 W. Missouri Avenue, #235
Glendale, AZ 85305

* Number of Shares: 785.60323
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 91; NLS 215

Barbara Condon
317 W. Nopal Place
Chandler, AZ 85225

* Number of Shares: 864.05104
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 93; NLS 219

Barbara Crow
502 S. Mariposa St.
Payson, AZ 85541

* Number of Shares: 2,182.21807
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 94; NLS 214

Beatrice Ortiz
2435 W. Gaby Rd.
Phoenix, AZ 85041

* Number of Shares: 4,558.42127
* Case/Proof of Claim No.: CPES 97; NLS 216

Counsel for Robert Bennetti, Linda Mariano, Linki Peddy, and
Charles Foust, Jr., and in excess of 92 Other CPES Employee Stock
Ownership Plan and Trust Participants can be reached at:

      HAWKINS PARNELL & YOUNG LLP
      David R. Johanson, Esq.
      Douglas A. Rubel, Esq.
      1776 Second Street
      Napa, CA 94559
      Telephone: (707) 299-2470
      Facsimile: (707) 581-1704
      E-mail: djohanson@hpylaw.com
              drubel@hpylaw.com

         - and -

      Scott McNutt, Esq.
      324 Warren Road
      San Mateo, CA 94402
      Telephone: 415-760-5601
      E-mail: smcnutt@ML-SF.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://bit.ly/3BGZCMM

        About Community Provider of Enrichment Services

Community Provider of Enrichment Services, Inc. --
https://www.cpes.com/ -- which conducts business under the name
CPES, is a community human services and healthcare organization
based in Tucson, Ariz.  It offers a full range of community-based
behavioral health services, substance abuse treatment, foster care,
and intellectual and developmental disability support with
locations throughout Arizona and California.

CPES and its affiliate, Novelles Developmental Services, Inc.,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 20-10554) on April 24, 2020.  On Aug. 11,
2020, another affiliate, CPES California, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 20-15456).

At the time of the filing, CPES reported $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities while Novelles Developmental
Services disclosed assets of $100,000 to $500,000 and liabilities
of the same range.  CPES California disclosed assets of $1 million
to $10 million and liabilities of $100,001 to $500,000.  

Judge Deborah J. Saltzman oversees the cases.  The Debtors tapped
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP as their legal counsel and
CohnReznick Capital Market Securities, LLC as their investment
banker.

Timothy J. Stacy is the patient care ombudsman appointed in the
Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  He is represented by Resnik Hayes
Moradi, LLP.


CRC INVESTMENTS: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 31
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North
Carolina, Winston Salem Division, has authorized CRC Investments,
LLC to use cash collateral on an interim basis for the period
through including December 31, 2021, in the amounts and for the
purposes set forth in the interim budget, to pay on-going costs of
operating the business and insuring, preserving, repairing and
protecting all its tangible assets.  

Judge Lena Mansori James ruled that secured parties (i) Portfolio
Holdings IV-NC, LLC; (ii) the Internal Revenue Service; and (iii)
the U.S. Small Business Administration are granted a perfected
replacement lien in all post-petition assets of the Debtor to the
same extent and priority as existed prepetition for the diminution
in value of the Secured Parties' collateral occasioned by the
Debtors' use of Cash Collateral.  The Debtor is also required to
pay all applicable insurance premiums, taxes, and other
governmental charges as they come due and make all tax deposits and
file all applicable tax returns on a timely basis, as a form of
adequate protection.  

Portfolio, through its acquisition of a Bank of America loan, holds
a note and deed of trust against the Debtor's real property located
at 85 Pine Crest Lane, Tryon, in Polk County, North Carolina.
Portfolio asserts a security interest in rents pursuant to its deed
of trust.  The Debtor owes taxes, penalties, and interest to the
IRS which is now covered with a secured lien by the IRS.  In
connection with its business operations, the Debtor obtained an
EIDL (Economic Injury Disaster Loan) from SBA, secured by a lien
upon the Debtor's personal property and fixtures.  As of the
Petition Date, the IRS was owed approximately $509,757; the SBA was
owed approximately $126,500; and Portfolio was owed approximately
$1,100,000.

Notwithstanding any suspension or termination of the right to use
cash collateral, the Court ruled that the Debtor will be permitted
to carve out from cash collateral or any replacement collateral and
use an aggregate amount necessary to pay all permitted trailing
expenses.  Permitted trailing expenses are, on the termination
date, the costs of operating and preserving the estate, including
allowed administrative fees, costs, or expenses, to the extent
incurred postpetition and prior to such termination date but in the
aggregate amount not to exceed 110% of the aggregate amounts set
forth in the budget through such termination date. In addition to
budgeted amounts, permitted trailing expenses will include court
costs and quarterly Chapter 11 fees as allowed by the Court.

A copy of the fifth interim order and the Debtor's
November-December 2021 budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3CLlqYS from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The budget provided for $57,566 in total income and $56,692 in
total expenses.

A further hearing on the motion will be held at 1:30 p.m. (Eastern)
on December 21, 2021, in the Courtroom located at 601 W. 4th
Street, Winston Salem, North Carolina.

                       About CRC Investments

CRC Investments, LLC, d/b/a 1906 Pine Crest Inn and Restaurant,
filed a petition under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 (Bankr. M.D. N.C.
Case No. 21-80172) on May 6, 2021, estimating between $1,000,000
and $10 million in assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed
by Carl Ray Caudie, Jr., general manager.

Judge Lena Mansori James oversees the case.

Joshua H. Bennett, Esq., at Bennett Guthrie PLLC, represents the
Debtor as counsel.



CREATD INC: Gets $7.8M from Stock Offering, Warrants Exercise
-------------------------------------------------------------
Creatd, Inc. provided an update on its unaudited balance sheet,
recent funding, and other financial information.  Last week, the
Company announced the close of its registered direct offering of
850,000 shares, priced at the market under Nasdaq rules and
yielding over $3.4 million in net proceeds to the Company.  In
addition to the financing, the Company recently brought in $4.4
million in cash through the exercise of warrants.  In total, the
Company last week received over $7.8 in cash proceeds,
significantly strengthening its balance sheet.

Between October 22 and Oct. 29, 2021, the Company saw the exercise
of approximately 875,000 warrants into shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $4.50, as well as approximately $1.1 million in
debt conversions at a price of $5.00 per share; with these
conversions, the Company has now fully eliminated all debt
remaining from its May 2021 convertible note offering.  After
factoring in the above transactions, Creatd now has approximately
16.3 million shares issued and outstanding.  Additionally, there
currently remain approximately 3 million outstanding privately-held
warrants, the majority of which may be exercised at a price of
$4.50, and 2.5 million publicly traded warrants having exercise
prices of $4.50.

Creatd is pleased to report that it has now paid off nearly all
remaining debt on its balance sheet, with the exception of a
$660,000 note related to the acquisition of Seller's Choice and
approximately $200,000 in an outstanding PPP loan.  As of today,
the Company has settled most of its outstanding payables including
legal, accounting, and technology development fees.  The Company
also has a credit in the amount of approximately $500,000 with its
development partner, Thinkmill.  Additionally, the Company
allocated $1.8 million to fully pay down its existing balance with
third party marketing platforms, leaving Creatd the ability to draw
down on up to $3 million in available credit with its long-standing
social media partners.

Commented Creatd founder and co-CEO, Jeremy Frommer, "Having made
progress on all of the above payables, as well as closed our recent
financing, our company now has in excess of $5 million in cash plus
the aforementioned vendor credits to support our strategic growth
plans.  Having considerably fortified our balance sheet and reduced
our debt by 56% to $1.1 million since the end of third quarter, we
are well-positioned to execute across all four of Creatd's
pillars."
  
Frommer continued, "While we progress toward our 100,000 Vocal+
member milestone, we have been able to significantly reduce our
dependence on third party social media marketing platforms.  As a
result, we saw a 57% reduction in marketing costs between the
second and third quarters.  For the fourth quarter of 2021, we
expect marketing costs to remain under $2 million; outside of
marketing costs, we expect operating expenses as a whole to stay
consistent with previous quarterly levels.

"We estimate third quarter net revenues of approximately $1.2
million, representing a 24% increase from the second quarter of
2021 and our fourth consecutive quarter of double-digit growth.  In
addition, we currently project between $1.6 and $1.8 million in
revenues for the fourth quarter, a 30% to 50% quarter-over-quarter
growth rate."

Explained Creatd co-CEO, Laurie Weisberg, "Our third and fourth
quarter 2021 revenue expectations factor in the supply chain
challenges that have disrupted e-commerce on a global scale.  With
those disruptions in mind, we still expect to see Creatd Ventures'
e-commerce businesses continue to ramp up and begin materially
impacting revenues in Q1 2022.  With our third quarter numbers
expected to be released on November 15, we look forward to sharing
a more in depth understanding of the Creatd Partners' agency
business and its growth, particularly since the acquisition of the
WHE Agency."

                         About Creatd Inc.

Headquartered in Fort Lee, NJ, Creatd, Inc. -- https://creatd.com
-- is a creator-first technology company and the parent company of
the Vocal platform.  Its mission is to empower creators,
entrepreneurs, and brands through technology and partnership.  The
Company accomplishes this through Creatd's three main business
pillars: Vocal Ventures, Creatd Partners, and its newest
initiative, Recreatd.

Creatd, Inc reported a net loss of $24.21 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $8.04 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$6.61 million in total assets, $7.06 million in total liabilities,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $452,831.

Somerset, New Jersey-based Rosenberg Rich Baker Berman, P.A., the
Company's auditor since 2018, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated March 30, 2021, citing that the
Company had a significant accumulated deficit, and has incurred
significant net losses and negative operating cash flows.  These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern for a period of one year from the
issuance of the financial statements.


CYBER LITIGATION: Court Clarifies Decision on Bar Date Notice
-------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
issued an amended memorandum opinion dated October 28, 2021,
relating to the disallowance of the claim filed by Hansen
Networks.

According to the Court, following the issuance of the original
Memorandum Opinion dated October 21, 2021, the Court was apprised
of a provision of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9036, as
amended in 2019, that relates to the matters addressed in the
opinion.  While that Rule is not applicable to circumstances of
this case, to avoid introducing any confusion regarding the
application of the Rule in the cases to which it is directed, the
Court issued the Amended Memorandum Opinion, a full-text copy of
which is available at https://tinyurl.com/2c9rc7x6 from
Leagle.com.

The Debtor moved to disallow the claim filed by Hansen Networks,
which the Debtor scheduled as its largest unsecured creditor, on
the ground that the proof of claim was filed after the bar date and
should thus be disallowed as untimely. The parties have stipulated
that the official bar date notice, as approved by the Court, was
sent to the wrong address. An evidentiary hearing established that
the bar date notice was sent by mail to David Hansen, the principal
of Hansen Networks, but at an address where Mr. Hansen was no
longer residing at the time the notice was sent. The evidentiary
record also makes clear, however, that the bar date notice was sent
by email to an email account that Mr. Hansen actively used.

The Court held that the Debtor's objection to Hansen Networks'
claim on timeliness grounds will be overruled, without prejudice to
the rights of the debtor or any other party-in-interest to object
to the claim on other grounds.

                               About NS8 Inc.

Las Vegas-based NS8 Inc. -- https://www.ns8.com -- is a developer
of a comprehensive fraud prevention platform that combines
behavioral analytics, real-time scoring, and global monitoring to
help businesses minimize risk.

NS8 sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-12702)
on October 27, 2020. The petition was signed by Daniel P. Wikel,
the chief restructuring officer.

The Debtor was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $100 million to $500 million in liabilities at the time
of the filing.

Judge Craig T. Goldblatt replaced the Honorable Christopher S.
Sontchi as the case judge. The Debtor tapped Blank Rome LLP and
Cooley LLP as its legal counsel, and FTI Consulting Inc. as its
financial advisor. Stretto is the claims agent.

                                *     *     *

The company changed its name to Cyber Litigation after selling
substantially all of its assets to Codium Software LLC in December
2020.


DCP MIDSTREAM: Fitch Rates Proposed Sr. Unsec. Notes 'BB+'
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB+'/'RR4' rating to DCP Midstream
Operating LP's (DCP Operating) proposed senior unsecured notes,
which are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by its parent
company, DCP Midstream, LP (DCP). The guarantee by DCP will rank
equally in right of payment to all of DCP's existing and future
senior unsecured indebtedness. Fitch expects proceeds from the
offering will be used predominantly to repay borrowings under DCP
Operating's revolving credit facility.

Fitch currently rates DCP and DCP Midstream Operating, LP's
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) 'BB+' and senior unsecured
debt 'BB+'/'RR4'. The ratings have a Positive Outlook, reflecting
Fitch's expectation for DCP's leverage (measured as total debt with
equity credit to operating EBITDA) to decline below 4.5x by YE
2021. Other key triggers for an upgrade include the use of hedging
to reduce DCP's commodity price exposure and management's capital
allocation plans.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Scale and Scope of Operations: DCP's ratings reflect the size and
scale and diversity of its asset base. DCP is a large producer of
NGLs and processor of natural gas. The partnership has a robust
operating presence in most of the key production regions within the
U.S., specifically within the DJ Basin and Permian Basin and
spanning both the Midland and Delaware Basins. DCP has a diverse
set of largely investment-grade producers with no material customer
concentration.

The size and breadth of DCP's operations allow it to offer
customers end-to-end gathering, processing, storage and
transportation solutions, giving it a competitive advantage within
the regions where they have significant scale. Excess capacity on
several of DCP's systems provide opportunities for volume growth
without excess growth capex investment.

Volumetric and Commodity Price Exposure: DCP's ratings reflect its
exposure to volumetric and commodity price risks associated with
the domestic production and demand for natural gas and NGLs.
Approximately 60% of DCP's gross margin is provided from the
logistics and marketing (L&M) segment, which generally provides
fee-based cash flows with exposure to volumetric-risk.

Gathering and processing (G&P, approximately 40% of gross margin)
contracts are largely backed by dedicated acreage and are a mix of
non-commodity sensitive fee-based contracts and commodity sensitive
percent-of-proceeds (POP) and percent-of-liquids (POL) contracts.
YTD DCP has benefitted from its unhedged commodity-price exposure,
and improving demand and commodity prices have accelerated producer
well completions in the DJ Basin and Permian Basin.

As of 3Q21 approximately 75% of gross margin is fee-based and DCP
has hedged 13% of the remaining margin. The company has taken
advantage of favorable natural gas prices and added hedges that
reduce its sensitivity to a large drop in natural gas prices. Fitch
expects over 80% of DCP's gross margin to be fee-based or hedged in
2022. Its hedging program contributes to a steady cash flow profile
but also exposes it to longer-term hedge roll-over and commodity
price risks

Declining Leverage: Fitch expects leverage to decline to 4.4x by YE
2021 and fall closer to 4.2x by YE 2022. DCP is performing better
than Fitch expected, benefitting from stronger than expected
commodity prices, low operating costs, and remaining disciplined
regarding capital allocation. Management has been vocal about
improving leverage to around 4.0x by YE 2021 and closer to 3.5x by
YE 2022 (DCP's leverage metric includes 100% equity credit on the
preferred units and junior subordinated notes vs. Fitch's 50%
equity credit treatment) to provide DCP with the flexibility to be
a consolidator in the midstream space. Fitch's forecast does not
include any significant acquisitions. Any increase in
distributions, change in capital allocation or material
acquisitions may change the cadence of deleveraging.

Capital Allocation: Fitch has concerns over future capital
allocation plans given the strong FCF profile as volumes increase
and NGL pricing is high. While DCP's system is largely built out,
future capex is limited to smaller growth projects. The pace of
debt reduction may be affected if management decides to return cash
to shareholders by increasing the distribution or instituting a
share repurchase program or undertaking a debt financed
acquisition.

Supportive Ownership: Fitch rates DCP on a stand-alone basis, with
no explicit notching from its parent companies' ratings; however,
the ratings reflect that its owners have been and are likely to
remain supportive of its operating and credit profile. DCP's
ultimate owners of its general partner, Enbridge, Inc. (ENB;
BBB+/Stable) and Phillips 66 (PSX; not rated) have in the past
exhibited a willingness to forgo dividends. This support was most
recently demonstrated by the approval of the March 2020
distribution cut.

Parent Subsidiary Linkage: Fitch considers the consolidated credit
profile of DCP and DCP Operating under its "Parent and Subsidiary
Linkage Criteria" for the ratings of both entities. DCP is the
parent of DCP Operating, and DCP Operating is the only source of
cash flow for DCP. The only obligations at DCP are the series A, B,
and C preferred equity units. DCP Operating exhibits a stronger
credit profile as the operating subsidiary where the assets are
located and cash flow is generated. In addition, Fitch believes the
legal and operational ties between the two entities is strong. DCP
Operating's senior notes are unconditionally guaranteed by DCP.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

DCP's ratings are reflective of its favorable size, scale,
geographic and business line diversity within the NGL production
and transportation and natural gas G&P space. DCP has greater
exposure to commodity prices than other midstream peers, with
approximately 75% of gross margin supported by fixed-fee contracts.
This commodity price exposure has been partially mitigated in the
near term through DCP's use of hedges for its NGL, natural gas and
crude oil price exposure, pushing the percentage of gross margin,
either fixed-fee or hedged, up to 88% as of 3Q21. This helps DCP's
cash flow stability but exposes it to longer-term hedge roll-over
and commodity price risks.

DCP is smaller in terms of EBITDA generation but more
geographically diversified than NGL focused midstream peer Targa
Resources Corp. (BB+/Stable). DCP's assets span across several U.S.
regions in multiple basins with significant footprints in the DJ
Basin, Delaware and Midland Basins in the Permian, and SCOOP/STACK
in the Midcontinent region, with volume growth expected to come
from the DJ and Permian assets. Targa's operations are focused in
the Permian Basin. Targa's gross commodity price exposure is
similar to that of DCP as Targa's gross margin is approximately 85%
supported by fixed-fee or fee-floor contracts and hedges.

Fitch expects DCP's leverage to be around 4.4x by YE 2021 and
between 4.2x-4.5x by YE 2022. Targa's near-term leverage should
remain higher in the range of 4.6x-4.8x through 2023. DCP's
management has been vocal about continuing to deleverage, targeting
their bank leverage ratio (100% equity credit to preferred units
and junior subordinated notes which differs from Fitch's 50% equity
credit treatment) calculation of 4.0x as of YE 2021 and closer to
3.5x by YE 2022.

ONEOK Inc (BBB/Stable) is significantly larger in terms of size and
scale. ONEOK's NGL transportation network is larger than that of
DCP, comparable basin diversification. DCP generates less than half
the EBITDA than ONEOK. DCP's leverage is expected to be comparable
with ONEOK's leverage expected to be between 4.4x-4.8x in 2021.
ONEOK's limited commodity exposure and larger size and scale
account for the two-notch rating difference.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Base case WTI oil price deck $52/ bbl in 2022 and $50/ bbl in
    2023 and beyond and Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.75/mcf
    in 2022 and $2.45/mcf in 2023 and long-term. Fitch expects
    ethane to be influenced from the natural gas price deck and
    the other NGL hydrocarbon movements to be influenced from our
    WTI oil price deck;

-- Maintenance capital in the range of $45 million to $85 million
    in 2021. Growth spending of between $25 million and $75
    million in 2021 and growing incrementally in 2022;

-- Fitch's forecast does not assume any significant acquisitions;

-- No equity issuance or change in the dividend policy over the
    forecast period;

-- Upcoming debt maturities repaid using FCF and revolver
    borrowings where necessary.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- A demonstrated ability to maintain the percentage of fixed-fee
    or hedged gross margin at or above 70% while maintaining
    leverage (total debt with equity credit/operating EBITDA)
    below 4.5x could lead to a positive rating action.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Leverage expected above 5.5x on a sustained basis and may
    result in at least a one-notch downgrade;

-- A significant decline in fixed-fee or hedged commodity leading
    to gross margin less than 60% fixed fee or hedged without an
    appropriate significant adjustment in capital structure,
    specifically a reduction in leverage, would likely lead to at
    least a one-notch downgrade;

-- A significant change in the ownership support structure from
    GP owners ENB and PSX to the consolidated entity particularly
    with regard to the GP position on commodity price exposure,
    distribution policies and capital structure at DCP, the
    operating partnership.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: As of Sept. 30, 2021, DCP had total liquidity
of approximately $849 million, which includes $846 million undrawn
on it $1.4 billion senior unsecured revolving credit facility after
accounting for $2 million in LOC. Cash on the balance sheet was $3
million. DCP had $350 million of outstanding borrowings on the $350
million accounts receivable securitization facility.

Maturities are manageable as DCP may repay the $350 million of
senior notes due April 2022 early during the par call period on
Jan. 1, 2022. The next maturity is $500 million of senior notes due
in 2023. DCP's revolver is not due until December 2024.

DCP's senior unsecured revolving credit facility has a leverage
covenant that requires DCP's consolidated leverage ratio not to
exceed 5.0x for each quarter. The leverage ratio would be stepped
up to 5.5x for three quarters following any qualified acquisition.
For covenant calculation purposes, DCP's preferred equity and
junior subordinated notes are given 100% equity treatment (vs.
Fitch's 50% equity treatment.)

ISSUER PROFILE

DCP Midstream, LP is a master limited partnership that owns and
operates a diversified portfolio of midstream energy assets through
its wholly owned subsidiary DCP Midstream Operating, LP. DCP is a
large producer and marketer of natural gas liquids, and processor
of natural gas.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch applies 50% equity credit to DCP's junior subordinated notes
and to its existing preferred equity in Fitch's forecasts. Fitch
typically adjusts master limited partnership EBITDA to exclude
equity interest in earnings from nonconsolidated affiliates but
includes cash distributions from nonconsolidated affiliates.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


DCP MIDSTREAM: Moody's Gives Ba1 Rating on New $400MM Senior Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 rating to DCP Midstream
Operating LP's (DCP Midstream Operating) proposed $400 million
senior notes offering. DCP Midstream, LP's (DCP) existing ratings,
including the Ba1 Corporate Family Rating, Ba1-PD Probability of
Default Rating, Ba3 ratings on preferred units and SGL-2
Speculative Grade Liquidity (SGL) rating are unchanged.
Additionally, DCP Midstream Operating's existing Ba1 ratings on the
senior unsecured notes and the Ba2 rating on the junior
subordinated notes are unchanged. The rating outlook is stable.

DCP will use the net proceeds from the offering for repayment of
indebtedness under the revolving credit facility, which had $552
million outstanding as of September 30, 2021, and for general
partnership purposes. The company also has $350 million of notes
maturing in April 2022.

"DCP's proposed issuance will improve its liquidity and will not
materially affect its leverage," stated James Wilkins, Moody's Vice
President. "The company has the ability to repay revolver
borrowings or apply the proceeds towards repayment of its next debt
maturity, $350 million of notes due in April 2022."

Assignments:

Issuer: DCP Midstream Operating LP

Gtd Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned Ba1 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The proposed notes, which are senior unsecured obligations of DCP
Midstream Operating LP and guaranteed by its parent, DCP, are rated
at the same level as the Ba1 CFR since the senior unsecured debt
(notes and revolving credit facility) make up the majority of the
capital structure. All of the senior notes and the obligations
under the revolver rank pari passu.

DCP's Ba1 CFR reflects improving oil and gas industry fundamentals
that will support free cash flow generation and financial policies
supportive of lower leverage. Moody's expects the company's free
cash flow generation to grow, benefiting from robust oil and
natural gas prices and growing US economic activity that will
incentivize exploration and production companies to increase
production.

DCP has relatively stable cash flow associated with fee-based
businesses, meaningful scale in the US gathering and processing
sector and basin diversification. Cash flow stability benefits from
a combination of fee-based and hedged revenue that accounts for a
large majority of the gross margin and long-term contractual
arrangements with minimum volume commitments or life of lease or
acreage dedications. The rating is tempered by inherent commodity
price risk as well as MLP model risks with high payouts and the
reliance on debt and equity markets when funding large growth
projects.

DCP enjoys economies of scale as a large processor of natural gas
and natural gas liquids (NGLs) with integrated gathering and
processing as well as logistics assets that transport and process
hydrocarbons from the wellhead to markets. It has a diversified
portfolio with critical mass in three key areas -- the DJ Basin,
Midcontinent region and Permian Basin -- that offers growth
opportunities and helps offset regulatory risk in Colorado. The
rating also considers the support that the parents -- Phillips 66
(A3 negative) and Enbridge Inc. (Baa1 stable) -- have historically
provided.

DCP has good liquidity as indicated by its SGL-2 Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating. Its liquidity is supported by funds from
operations and $846 million of availability (before the repayment
of debt with the proceeds of the proposed offering, net of $2
million of letters of credit and $552 million of borrowings as of
September 30, 2021) under its $1.4 billion revolving credit
facility that matures December 9, 2024. The revolver has a maximum
leverage (net debt/EBITDA) covenant (5.0x; debt/EBITDA is adjusted
for partial year EBITDA for capital projects and acquisitions).
Moody's expects DCP will remain in compliance with its financial
covenant at least through 2022. The company also borrows under an
accounts receivable securitization facility that had $965 million
of receivables that secured $350 million of borrowings as of
September 30, 2021. In June 2021, DCP drew on the revolver to repay
$500 million of notes due September 2021. The company will
partially repay the revolver borrowings with its proposed notes
issuance. The next debt maturities will be $350 million of notes
due April 2022 and $500 million of notes due March 2023.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATING

The ratings could be upgraded if DCP's EBITDA continues to grow,
debt to EBITDA remains below 4.0x on a sustained basis and
distribution coverage remains above 1.3x. When calculating credit
metrics for purposes of assessing the potential of a ratings
upgrade, a portion of DCP's subordinated debt and preferred equity
will be included in Moody's adjusted debt. The CFR could be
downgraded if leverage exceeds 4.5x or it does not maintain a
distribution coverage ratio greater than 1x.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Midstream Energy
published in December 2018.

DCP Midstream, LP, headquartered in Denver, Colorado, is a publicly
traded, gathering and processing MLP. The DCP Midstream, LP common
LP units are owned by the public (43.5%) and the balance of the
common units and General Partner interest is owned by DCP
Midstream, LLC, a 50%/50% joint venture between Phillips 66 and
Enbridge Inc.


DCP MIDSTREAM: S&P Assigns 'BB+' Rating on Senior Unsecured Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings rated DCP Midstream Operating L.P.'s announced
senior unsecured notes 'BB+', in line with its existing notes,
because the issuance will not add incremental debt and credit
metrics will not be materially affected. The recover rating is '3'
which indicates its expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded
estimate: 55%) recovery in the event of payment default.

DCP intends to use the notes to repay revolver borrowings. The
'BB+' issuer credit rating and stable outlook are unchanged. S&P's
expectation that the company will remain cash flow positive and
maintain a conservative financial policy supports the rating.
Although the company should deleverage over time, S&P forecasts S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted leverage will remain above 4x for the next
few years.



DLVAM1302 NORTH SHORE: Seeks Cash Collateral Access
---------------------------------------------------
DLVAM1302 North Shore, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, for authority to use
cash collateral retroactive to November 1, 2021 in accordance with
the budget and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to fund its
operating expenses and costs of
administration in the Chapter 11 case.

HMC Assets LLC, solely in its capacity as Separate Trustee of Civic
Holdings III Trust, may hold a lien on rents generated by the
Debtor's real property located at 302 N. Shore Drive, Anna Maria,
Florida 34216 by virtue of an "assignments of rents" clause in
HMC's loan documents. The Debtor reserves the right to challenge
the validity, priority and extent of the HMC's lien against the
Debtor's assets. The Debtor presently owes HMC approximately
$1,231,452.

The Debtor estimates that the claim of HMC is secured by $1,866,500
in assets. The Secured Creditor Assets include $100 in cash and
accounts receivables which the Debtor expects to collect.

As adequate protection for the use of cash collateral, the Debtor
offers HMC:

     a. Post-petition replacement liens on the Secured Creditor
Assets to the same extent, validity, and priority as existed
pre-petition;

     b. The right to inspect the Secured Creditor Assets on 48
hours notice, provided that said inspection does not interfere with
the operations of the Debtor; and

     c. Copies of monthly financial documents generated in the
ordinary course of business and other information as HMC reasonably
requests with respect to the Debtor's operations.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/31tWCqx from
PacerMonitor.com.

                    About DLVAM1302 North Shore

Anna Maria, Fla.-based DLVAM1302 North Shore, LLC filed a petition
for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 21-05371) on
Oct. 20, 2021, disclosing $1,988,681 in total assets and $1,585,279
in total liabilities.  Floyd Calhoun, manager, signed the petition.
The Debtor tapped Buddy D. Ford, P.A. as legal counsel.



DRIVEN BRANDS: S&P Assigns 'B+' ICR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B+' issuer credit rating to the
issuer, North Carolina-based automotive services provider Driven
Holdings Inc., a core entity to the publicly traded parent entity
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'BB-' issue-level and '2'
recovery ratings to the proposed term loan B.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectations that Driven
will benefit from its good market position and diversification in
its addressable markets to drive performance growth while
participating in industry consolidation.

"Our ratings reflect Driven Brands' high leverage and integration
risks we associate with its acquisitive strategy, offset by its
good record of execution as well as its significant scale and
diversification."

Driven Brands has rapidly expanded its presence in the fragmented
automotive services market over the past five years while using
significant amounts of leverage to fund its acquisitive strategy.
The company is poised to, in our opinion, continue its rapid growth
through acquisitions and organic expansion. Driven's record of
execution has been good, allowing the company to become a
significant competitor in each of its addressable markets. The
company has demonstrated the ability to leverage its scale for
technological investment, effective site development, better buying
and in building relationships with large customers such as
insurance companies in the collision repair space. Still, inherent
risks are associated with large acquisitions to extract synergies
and operate assets well, especially when funded through incremental
debt.

A competitive industry dynamic with relatively stable demand
trends.

Driven had a long history of relatively stable same-store sales
trends in the low- to mid-single-digit-percent range, benefiting
from the large U.S. car parc (vehicles in operations or about 280
million automobiles), the largely nondiscretionary nature of its
offering and good diversification. In 2020, trends reversed with a
6% same-store sales decline as pandemic disruption dramatically
affected results, particularly in the second quarter. The business
proved resilient, however, with only modest declines in the second
half of 2020 and a significant rebound starting in 2021, which was
up about 17% through the third quarter. S&P said, "We believe the
performance demonstrates the essential nature of Driven's business
offerings and its relatively good market position as a larger
player versus independent operators. We also believe performance
trends will continue to find support from the aging of the U.S. car
parc, around 12 years."

The company operates under brands such as Meineke (maintenance
segment) and Maaco (auto body repair) in the U.S. S&P said, "While
its brands have some resonance with customers, we believe the
competitive landscape will remain intense. Competitors include
smaller regional players that may have loyal customers,
dealer-affiliated services, and other large, well-capitalized
players in sectors (such as Mister Car Wash Holdings Inc. in the
car wash business or Monro in maintenance). We think competition
depends on numerous factors including price, convenience, brand
awareness, and quality of services provided."

Evolving technology and updated service models will likely favor
larger competitors like Driven Brands.

S&P said, "We believe Driven is well positioned to adapt to the
evolving needs of the increasingly complex automotive services
industry given technological enhancements in vehicles. Over time,
do-it-yourself service of automobiles is likely to become more
challenging as automobile specifications become more specialized
and technologically advanced. Also, general consumer demands
continue to evolve toward more sophisticated or convenient service
offerings. For instance, Driven's Take 5 oil change service concept
has benefited from its unique, in-car model, which plays into this
overall convenience trend. In addition, Driven recently launched
unlimited car wash offerings and subscription models position it to
capitalize on the evolving industry trends.

"We think continued innovation and good execution will be important
to take share organically in the industry. Longer term, the company
is subject to potential change in individual car ownership rates
and other business model or technological innovations that may
reduce demand for automotive services. However, we also believe any
substantial impact from these risks, if they materialize, are
relatively distant because of the large existing car parc and slow
turnover of vehicles."

A diversified leader in a highly fragmented space with benefits
from its franchise model.

The company's maintenance, paint/repair/collision and platform
services segments are each well diversified across North America.
The car wash segment is concentrated in the U.S. southeast
domestically given the population dynamics but also has a sizable
presence across Europe following the large acquisition of
U.K.-based International Car Wash Group in 2020. This geographic
diversification is a credit strength, in S&P's view.

S&P thinks Driven benefits from its highly franchised model, which
provides high free cash flow conversion and reduces both capital
expenditure needs and operating fluctuations associated with
operating businesses. About 80% of the company's stores are
franchised. Franchisee penetration varies across businesses with
the bulk of company-owned units in the maintenance (more than 500
units) and car wash (close to 300 units) segments. The company has
a sizable pipeline of franchisee agreements in place that should
facilitate future growth to build royalty cash flow.

Private equity sponsor still has considerable ownership of public
company.

The company went public in early 2021 and is now pre-funding likely
future acquisitions with the proposed term loan issuance, as Driven
continues its effort to roll up participants in the auto services
markets. While publicly traded, the company remains majority-owned
by a financial sponsor, Roark Capital, which still owns more than
60% of shares. S&P said, "We accordingly exclude Driven's balance
sheet cash position from our adjusted credit metrics. Sponsor
ownership notwithstanding, we view Driven's board as predominantly
independent with six board members out of nine autonomous of Roark.
In addition, we expect that the sponsor will gradually sell down
its position over time in our base-case expectations. If Roark were
to increase its equity stake or take a more active role to
influence governance structure, strategy, and financial policy, we
would likely view this as a credit negative."

S&P said, "The stable outlook on Driven Brands reflects our
expectation that operating income will continue to improve with
economic conditions supporting growth in automotive maintenance in
addition to new stores and tuck-in acquisitions. We also project
the company will maintain relatively stable credit metrics
including adjusted leverage in the 7x area and interest coverage in
the mid-2x area over the next 12 months.

"We could lower our rating on Driven Brands if credit metrics
deteriorate, including adjusted interest coverage less than 2x and
adjusted leverage approaching mid-8x or more. This scenario could
occur if the company pursues a large, debt-financed acquisition or
it experiences operational setbacks." This could include:

-- Operating performance weakens, possibly because of heightened
competition and a sharp, sustained decline in car maintenance
spending, or a significant increase in operating costs.

-- A sustained weakness at both company-operated and franchised
operations with the later leading to franchisees requiring
financial support, or

-- An inability to adequately integrate a meaningfully large
acquisition.

S&P could raise its rating on Driven if it executed on its
operating strategies with minimal integration issues and maintained
a consistent financial policy. This scenario could include:

-- A successful expansion of operations while increasing its
market share and diversifying its geographic footprint and earnings
base.

-- The financial sponsor reduces its ownership position to less
than 40%, leading us to reassess S&P's financial policy modifier.



DRIVEN HOLDINGS: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR & Rates New Term Loan B2
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned Driven Holdings, LLC a B2
corporate family rating and a B2-PD probability of default rating.
Moody's has also assigned B2 ratings to Driven Holdings' proposed
$500 million senior secured term loan due 2028 and existing $300
million revolving credit facility expiring 2026. The speculative
grade liquidity rating is SGL-1. The outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the issuance will be used for general corporate
purposes, including funding future acquisitions. Moody's ratings
and outlook are subject to receipt and review of final
documentation.

"The ratings assignment reflects Driven Holdings' strong business
profile including its significant scale, strong geographic and
brand diversity, and well-recognized automotive repair and
maintenance brand names along with its solid operating performance
and cash flow which we believe provides it with the ability to
support higher leverage than is typical for its B2 corporate family
rating," stated Stefan Kahandaliyanage, Moody's Vice President
Senior Analyst. The B2 CFR also reflects governance considerations
particularly Driven Holdings' very high leverage and its private
equity majority ownership.

Assignments:

Issuer: Driven Holdings, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B2

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-1

Gtd Senior Secured Term Loan B, Assigned B2 (LGD4)

Gtd Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned B2 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Driven Holdings, LLC

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Driven Holdings' B2 CFR reflects the benefits of its significant
system-wide revenue scale, market position as one of the largest
automotive service operators with over 4,300 locations, and
multiple brands across a wide range of industry segments including
paint, collision, glass, oil change, regular maintenance, car wash,
and parts supply. The B2 CFR is also supported by the national
brand recognition of portfolio companies including Meineke and
Maaco. Positive consideration is also given to Driven Brands solid
free cash flow given the relatively low working capital and capex
requirements of its largely franchised based business model. Over
80% of Driven Brands' locations are franchised which generates
franchise fees and recurring royalty revenue (typically around 4.5%
of gross store revenues for an initial 15 year term) with limited
capital spending as these investments are borne by the
franchisees.

However, Driven Holdings is constrained by its very high leverage,
integration and financing risks associated with acquisitions which
is a core growth strategy for the company, and industry challenges
associated with staffing, supply chain and product inflation which
could negatively impact store revenues and profitability. Proforma
leverage for the $500 million term loan issuance as measured by
Moody's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA is approximately 7.6x. Assuming a
level of future acquisition EBITDA based on proceeds from the term
loan issuance combined with a portion of cash on hand and prior
acquisition multiples, pro forma leverage is closer to 6.6x.
Moody's adjusted debt calculation includes standard adjustments for
operating leases and does not net cash on the balance sheet.

The B2 rating on the term loan also reflects Driven Holdings'
restricted group that is highly reliant on the steady distribution
of the residuals and SPV management fees from the whole business
securitization (WBS) entities to support its operations and cash
flows. Other than the car wash assets, Automotive Training
Institute, and certain company-owned store assets which, together,
are not included in the WBS, the WBS has priority claim to
substantially all revenue-generating assets of Driven Brands
including current and future intellectual property for each brand,
royalties, all existing and future franchise and development
agreements, profits from certain maintenance and paint, collision &
glass company-owned locations and related store assets, profits
from certain business in Canada, and hard parts and accessories
distribution margin in the US. For the LTM period ending Q3 2021,
the residual distribution from the WBS was approximately $237
million while the SPV management fees were approximately $56
million. As of Q3 2021, under the WBS, there is about $260 million
of debt issuance capacity available implied by the senior leverage
ratio cushion.

The rating is also constrained by governance considerations,
specifically the potential for aggressive financial policy actions
taken by the company's private equity majority owner which may
include debt-funded dividend distributions and further debt-funded
acquisitions.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation for modestly
growing revenue and earnings as consumer car travel behavior
normalizes, resulting in a moderate decline in leverage. The
outlook also reflects Driven Brands' very good liquidity over the
next 12-18 months.

As proposed, the $500 million senior secured term loan due 2028 and
$300 million RCF expiring 2026 are expected to provide covenant
flexibility that if utilized could negatively impact creditors.
Notable terms include the following:

Incremental debt capacity up to the greater of $250.0 million and
100% of EBITDA for the most recent Test Period as determined on a
Pro Forma basis, plus unlimited amounts so long as the Net First
Lien Leverage Ratio will be no greater than 3.00x for pari passu
debt (with "no worse" tests in connection with an acquisition or
other investment). Amounts for customary bridge loans and other
customary Term A Loans and other loans in an amount of up to the
greater of $300 million or 100% of EBITDA may be incurred with an
earlier maturity date than the initial term loans.

The credit agreement permits the transfer of assets to unrestricted
subsidiaries, up to the carve-out capacities, subject to "blocker"
provisions which prevent unrestricted subsidiaries from owning, or
holding any exclusive licenses of, any Material Intellectual
Property (except in the case of any Securitization Entity in
connection with or in contemplation of a Permitted Securitization
Financing).

Subsidiary Guarantors must continue to provide guarantees whether
or not they are wholly-owned subsidiaries, eliminating the risk
that guarantees will be released because they cease to be
wholly-owned to the extent the subsidiary becomes non-wholly owned
as a result of a transaction that is not a bona fide transaction
with an unaffiliated third party and not for the purpose of
circumventing the security and guarantee requirements of the Loan
Documents.

The credit agreement provides some limitations on up-tiering
transactions.

The proposed terms and the final terms of the credit agreement may
be materially different.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded with successful integration of
expected acquisitions, sustained organic improvement in operating
performance, and a more moderate financial policy that results in
sustained strengthening of credit metrics with debt to EBITDA
approaching 5.25 times and EBIT to interest of well over 2.0 times.
A higher rating would also require very good liquidity.

The ratings could be downgraded in the event that the integration
of planned acquisitions takes longer than expected and/or synergies
are not substantially realized or operating performance flags to
where debt to EBITDA remains above 6.75 times or if EBIT to
interest falls below 1.5 times or free cash flow to debt declines
below 4% on a sustained basis. The ratings could also be downgraded
if Driven Holdings pursues another acquisition debt raise or
debt-financed distribution to shareholders prior to credit metrics
improving. A deterioration in liquidity or the inability to
generate positive free cash flow could also result in a downgrade.

Driven Holdings, LLC, is the restricted group borrower subsidiary
of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
(Driven Brands). Driven Brands is a large, publicly-traded
automotive services company (NASDAQ: DRVN) operating in North
America and Europe, catering to a range of consumer and commercial
automotive needs, including paint, collision, glass, oil change,
regular maintenance, car wash, and parts supply. Annual revenues
are approximately $1.4 billion while systemwide sales generated by
over 4,300 mostly-franchised locations is approximately $4 billion.
Driven Brands is majority-owned and controlled by affiliates of
Roark Capital Group, a private equity firm.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.


EAGLE HOSPITALITY: Court Okays Bankruptcy Plan for Creditor Vote
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf of Bloomberg Law reports that the bankruptcy court has
approved Eagle Hospitality's bankruptcy plan for creditor vote.

Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trust's bankrupt U.S.
units won court approval to solicit votes on a creditor-backed plan
to liquidate, following sales of its hotels.

EHT US1 Inc. and 26 other Eagle subsidiaries, whose plan
disclosures were approved Thursday, November 4, 2021, temporarily
beat an objection from the U.S. Trustee's Office over proposed
liability releases for a creditor, Bank of America.

The company put forward a Chapter 11 plan following sales of 14 of
its 15 hotel properties for about $482 million.

Under the proposed plan, secured lenders agreed to limit their
claims in the bankruptcy to $380.5 million.

                 About Eagle Hospitality Group

Eagle Hospitality Trust -- https://eagleht.com/ -- is a hospitality
stapled group comprising Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment
Trust ("Eagle H-REIT") and Eagle Hospitality Business Trust. Based
in Singapore, Eagle H-REIT is established with the principal
investment strategy of investing on a long-term basis, in a
diversified portfolio of income-producing real estate which is used
primarily for hospitality and/or hospitality-related purposes, as
well as real estate-related assets in connection with the
foregoing, with an initial focus on the United States.

EHT US1, Inc., and 26 affiliates, including 15 LLC entities that
each owns hotels in the U.S., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-10036) on Jan. 18, 2021.

EHT US1, Inc., estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped PAUL HASTINGS LLP as bankruptcy counsel; FTI
CONSULTING, INC., as restructuring advisor; and MOELIS & COMPANY
LLC, as investment banker. COLE SCHOTZ P.C. is the Delaware
counsel. RAJAH & TANN SINGAPORE LLP is Singapore Law counsel, and
WALKERS is Cayman Law counsel. DONLIN, RECANO & COMPANY, INC., is
the claims agent.


EDISON INT'L: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on Preferred Stock Series B
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB' instrument rating to Edison
International's (EIX) Fixed Rate Reset Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock Series B ($1000 Liquidation Preference). The
securities receive 50% equity credit under Fitch's "Corporate
Hybrids and Notching" criteria. Proceeds from the issuance of the
preferred securities will be used to repay commercial paper
borrowings and for general corporate purposes. EIX's Issuer Default
Rating is 'BBB-'/Stable.

The credit metrics of EIX and its core operating utility
subsidiary, Southern California Edison Company (SCE; BBB/Stable)
have been pressured by costs associated with the 2017/2018 wildfire
and mudslide events, among other things. EIX recently revised its
best estimate of costs associated with the events to $7.5 billion
from $6.2 billion, reflecting recent experience settling claims and
settlement of the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC)
Safety Enforcement Division's (SED) investigation.

Key credit concerns for EIX include pressure on credit metrics
driven by continued escalation of wildfire liabilities and
premature depletion of the Assembly Bill (AB) 1054 wildfire fund.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Wildfire Expense Reserve Increased: In 3Q 2021, EIX booked a $1.3
billion charge to reflect an increase in the company's best
estimate of exposure to the wildfire and mudslide events of
2017/2018, bringing the total estimated costs to approximate $7.5
billon.

The charge reflects EIX's recent experience settling 2017/2018
wildfire claims. Also included in the 3Q 2021 charge is an
agreement resolving the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC)
Safety Enforcement Division's (SED) investigation of the 2017/2018
wildfire and mudslide events. Under the terms of the agreement, EIX
agrees to $175 million of fines, penalties and other costs and will
not to seek recovery of $375 million of third-party liabilities.

Uncertain Cost Recovery Prospects: Fitch believes the timing and
ultimate recovery of costs associated with the 2017/2018 wildfires
and mudslides in SCE's service territory is uncertain. Accordingly,
Fitch's forecast assumes no recovery of third-party liabilities
incurred by EIX under inverse condemnation from 2017/2018 wildfire
and mudslides.

Settlement of pending claims by SCE, among other considerations, is
a key gating item to filing for cost recovery with the CPUC. Fitch
believes SCE has settled the large majority of claims, is working
expeditiously to resolve remaining third-party wildfire and
mudslide liabilities, a key gating item to filing with the CPUC for
cost recovery. Completion of the cost recovery process and the
timing and amount potential cost recovery is, in Fitch's view,
subject to a high degree of risk.

Wildfire Risk Challenges Creditworthiness: EIX's and SCE's ratings
and Rating Outlooks consider the credit impact from past and
potential catastrophic wildfires sparked by utility equipment and
related third-party liabilities. AB 1054 was enacted July 2019, in
response to the catastrophic firestorms of 2017 and 2018. Fitch
believes the wildfire insurance fund created by AB 1054 is credit
supportive and will effectively address liquidity risk associated
with the mismatch in the timing of when claims are paid by the
California investor-owned utilities (IOU) under inverse
condemnation and ultimately recovered in rates.

Fitch expects the wildfire fund to function as designed, insulating
SCE from the financial impact of eligible wildfire claims under
inverse condemnation in the event of large future wildfires sparked
by the utility's equipment.

A continuing pattern of utility-sparked wildfires and related
liabilities of the size and scale witnessed in 2017/2018 leading to
sooner-than-expected exhaustion of the AB 1054 wildfire fund would
likely lead to future adverse credit rating actions. Conversely,
significant moderation in utility-related catastrophic wildfire
activity in California and associated liabilities would support
future potential constructive credit rating actions.

Fitch believes this year's Dixie Fire, which occurred in Pacific
Gas and Electric Company's service territory, is of sufficient
magnitude to potentially result in eligible claims against the fund
in the next few years if the fire is determined to have been
sparked by the utility's equipment and inverse condemnation is
invoked.

Credit Metrics Pressured: EIX's and SCE's credit metrics have been
pressured by significant unrecovered liabilities associated with
2017/2018 wildfires, the cost of participating in the AB 1054
wildfire fund, including contributions to the fund, large capex,
and no equity return on $1.6 billion of wildfire related capex.
Elevated capex reflects higher wildfire mitigation spend and
investment in grid modernization to accommodate greater penetration
of distributed resources in support of California's greenhouse gas
reduction goals. EIX's FFO leverage was 6.3x in 2020 and is
projected by Fitch to remain at or above the negative rating
sensitivity of 5.5x in 2021 and 2022 before improving to
approximately 5.0x in 2023 and 2024.

EIX Debt: Fitch believes EIX's consolidated balance-sheet debt is
manageable, totaling $30.3 billion as of Sept. 30, 2021, including
holding company and utility preferred and preference securities of
approximately $3.1 billion. EIX parent-only debt and preferred was
$4.8 billion at the end of 3Q 2021.

Parent-only EIX debt has increased sharply from approximately $400
million at YE 2013, but remains at the low-end of the range of
parent-only debt for large utility holding companies. Higher EIX
debt is due to funding requirements at SCE for capex, catastrophic
wildfire costs and payments to creditors of former subsidiary
Edison Mission Energy under its bankruptcy court-approved
reorganization plan. EIX's parent-only debt and preferred
securities represent approximately 16% of EIX's consolidated
balance sheet debt and preferred and preference securities as of
Sept. 30, 2021.

Parent-Subsidiary Rating Linkage: EIX subsidiary SCE accounts for
virtually all of EIX's consolidated earnings and cash flows. As
such, Fitch applies a weaker parent-stronger subsidiary approach in
rating SCE and EIX, reflecting EIX's dependence on cash flows from
SCE to meet its obligations. SCE's IDR is the same as EIX's,
reflecting moderate rating linkage due to robust strategic and
operational linkage. IDR notching also considers structural
subordination of EIX debt relative to SCE and the utility's
dependence on capital from its corporate parent to balance its
regulatory capital structure.

ESG Considerations: Fitch recently revised EIX's and SCE's
Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Relevance Scores (RS) to
'4' from '5' for Exposure to Environmental Impacts. The ESG RS
revision reflects Fitch's assessment of wildfire risks to
creditworthiness as being manageable within EIX's and SCE's current
rating category. The revision considers efforts underway at EIX to
enhance resilience and mitigate financial effects associated with
firestorm activity in California. Post -2018 wildfires in SCE's
service territory have been meaningfully smaller and more
manageable and access to the AB 1054 wildfire fund provides a
significant financial buffer to absorb future wildfire
liabilities.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

EIX compares favorably with peer utility holding company PG&E Corp.
(PCG; BB/Stable) and is similarly positioned to Cleco Corporate
Holdings (Cleco; BBB-/Stable) and Puget Energy Inc. (PE;
BBB-/Stable). Both EIX's and PCG's business risk profiles are
seriously challenged by outsized wildfire-related liabilities with
significantly more devastating effect for PCG. Post-2018 wildfires
in SCE's service territory have been smaller and more manageable
than the 2017/2018 wildfires.

EIX, PCG, Cleco and PE are single utility-holding companies
operating in parts of California (PCG & EIX), Washington (PE) and
Louisiana (Cleco). EIX and PCG are significantly greater in size
and scale than PE or Cleco and parent-only debt is significantly
lower -- approximately 10% to 15% for EIX and PCG versus 30% for PE
and 50% for Cleco. Virtually all of EIX's, PCG's and PE's
consolidated EBITDA is provided by regulated operations and
approximately 75% for Cleco. Fitch estimates FFO leverage will
approximate 5x-6x in 2022 for EIX, Cleco and PE and 5x for PCG.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

-- No rate recovery of 2017-2018 wildfire liabilities;

-- SCE pays approximately $7.5 billion of total wildfire-related
    third-party liabilities;

-- No equity return on the first $1.6 billion of wildfire
    mitigation plan capex;

-- Capex of more than approximately $17 billion 2021-2023;

-- Balanced funding of SCE's capex program.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Consistent progress reducing firestorm risk in the
    intermediate-to-long term and FFO leverage of 5.0x or better
    on a sustained basis;

-- Consecutive years of more manageable utility-triggered
    wildfire activity consistent with pre-2017/2018 levels or
    better with ongoing reduction of public safety power shut-offs
    and improvement in their execution;

-- Successful implementation of A.B. 1054, with regard to
    resiliency initiatives, durability of the wildfire insurance
    fund and CPUC interpretation of prudence standards;

-- Better than expected regulatory outcomes with respect to
    timeliness and substance.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Significant parent-only debt issuance;

-- A downgrade of SCE;

-- FFO leverage of greater than 5.5x on a sustained basis.

-- Continuing catastrophic wildfire activity leading to depletion
    of the wildfire fund more quickly than expected and resulting
    exposure to incremental wildfire liabilities;

-- Execution risk associated with A.B. 1054, including safety
    certification issuance, implementation of the wildfire
    insurance fund or unexpectedly large prudence disallowance by
    the CPUC;

-- Ineffective implementation of wildfire mitigation plans or
    poor operating response to wildfires;

-- Poor wildfire mitigation plan PSPS execution, communication
    and management;

-- Adverse political, legislative or regulatory developments.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: Fitch believes EIX has ample consolidated
liquidity. EIX has negotiated $4.9 billion of consolidated
revolving credit facilities (RCFs) composed of a $1.5 billion
revolver at the corporate parent and a $3.4 billion revolver at
SCE. As of Sept. 30, 2021, $420 million was drawn under EIX's $1.5
billion revolver, and SCE had no outstanding borrowings and letters
of credit of $246 million under the utility's $3.4 billion
revolving credit agreement.

In April 2021, SCE and EIX amended their revolving credit
facilities extending the termination dates to May 2025 from May
2024 and increasing the commitment amount at the utility by $350
million to $3.4 billion. As of Sept. 30, 2021, EIX had consolidated
cash and cash equivalents of $484 million ($40 million of which was
parent-only) and consolidated, borrowing capacity available of
approximately $4.2 billion under credit facilities at EIX and SCE.

Like most utilities, SCE is expected to be FCF negative based on
Fitch's assumptions and its large capex program. Negative FCF is a
function of high capex driven by spending to mitigate catastrophic
wildfire activity and meet California's greenhouse gas reduction
goals, which are among the most aggressive in the nation. Fitch
expects cash shortfalls to be funded with a balanced mix of debt
and equity. EIX and SCE have access to debt capital markets and
Fitch believes debt maturities are manageable.

ISSUER PROFILE

Holding company EIX's core utility, SCE, is one of the largest
investor-owned electric utilities in the U.S. with total assets of
$71 billion as of 2Q 2021. SCE provides electricity services to 15
million people through 5 million customer accounts across a 50,000
square-mile service territory in Central, Southern and Coastal
California.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Edison International has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Exposure
to Environmental Impacts due to exposure to wildfires and related
third-party liabilities, which has a negative impact on the credit
profile, and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction with other
factors. Fitch recently revised EIX's ESG RS to '4' from '5' for
Exposure to Environmental Impacts. The revision reflects Fitch's
assessment of wildfire risks to creditworthiness as being
manageable within EIX's current rating category.

Edison International has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Exposure
to Social Impacts due to exposure to wildfires and their adverse
impact on SCE's customer base, which has a negative impact on the
credit profile, and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction with
other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


EDISON INTERNATIONAL: S&P Rates Perpetual Preferred Stock B 'BB+'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level rating to Edison
International's fixed-rate reset cumulative perpetual preferred
stock Series B. The company intends to use the net proceeds from
this issuance either to repay its outstanding commercial paper
borrowings or for general corporate purposes.

S&P said, "We rate the securities two notches below our 'BBB'
long-term issuer credit rating on Edison International to reflect
their subordination and the company's ability to defer dividends on
the instruments, as defined in our criteria for hybrid securities.
The dividend payments are deferrable, which fulfills the
deferability element. The instruments are also subordinated to all
of Edison International's existing and future senior debt
obligations, thereby satisfying the condition for subordination. We
assess the securities as having intermediate (50%) equity content
through March 15, 2027.

"We consider the effective maturity date to be March 15, 2047. At
this date, the securities' cumulative step-up terms exceed 26 basis
points, without a replacement capital covenant, which--in our
view--represents a material incentive to redeem the security. Under
our criteria, investment-grade hybrids that receive intermediate
equity content require 20 years of residual time until the
effective maturity date. As such, we limit the duration of our
intermediate equity content treatment through March 15, 2027."



EHT US1 INC: Claims Will be Paid from Sale Proceeds
---------------------------------------------------
Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trust, a debtor affiliate
of EHT US1, Inc. and the other Liquidating Debtors, the Committee,
and the Prepetition Agent submitted a First Amended Joint Plan of
Liquidation dated November 1, 2021.

The Liquidating Debtors, the Committee, and the Prepetition Agent
are the proponents of the Plans within the meaning of Section 1129
of the Bankruptcy Code. For the avoidance of doubt, none of the
Liquidating Debtors are being substantively consolidated under the
Plans.

The Plans shall be implemented in accordance with the Plan
Settlement. The Plans contemplate the appointment of a Liquidating
Trustee to implement the Plans and make Distributions in accordance
with their terms. The wind-down of the Singapore Debtors shall be
handled by the REIT Trustee. Except as otherwise provided by order
of the Bankruptcy Court, Distributions will occur at various times
on and after the Effective Date.

Class 5 consists of Other General Unsecured Claims against such
Debtor Propco. Each Holder of an Allowed Other General Unsecured
Claim against a Debtor Propco shall receive (i) its pro rata share
of the Guaranteed Other GUC Distribution and (ii) Liquidating Trust
Interests (Propco) which entitle such Holder to receive on account
of its Allowed and unpaid Other General Unsecured Claim, its pro
rata share of the Other GUC Trust Distribution until such Allowed
Other General Unsecured Claim is paid in full (including any
postpetition interest to the extent entitled thereto under
applicable law), in each case subject to the Plan Settlement.

Holders of Allowed Other General Unsecured Claims against the
Debtor Propcos shall receive Liquidating Trust Interests (Propco)
evidencing the right to receive any such Distributions that cannot
be made as of the Effective Date. To the extent necessary to
effectuate Distributions, Holders of Other General Unsecured Claims
are the beneficiaries of the Plan Settlement Allocation. lass 5 is
Impaired under each Debtor Propco Plan.

Class 8 consists of Prepetition Lender Claims against each Debtor
Non-Propco to the extent such Prepetition Lender Claims are not
Secured Prepetition Lender Non-Propco Claims. The Prepetition
Lender Claims against each Debtor Non-Propco shall be Allowed in
each Plan, on a joint and several basis against each Debtor Non
Propco, in an aggregate amount of no less than $380,513,355.00.

After payment in full of all A/P/S Claims and Secured Prepetition
Lender Non-Propco Claims, any remaining Cash at each Debtor
Non-Propco shall be distributed on a pro rata basis to the
Prepetition Agent (on account of the Prepetition Lender Claims)
until the Prepetition Lender Claims are paid in full. Such pro rata
share shall be a fraction where the numerator shall be the
aggregate amount of Prepetition Lender Claims and the denominator
the sum of the aggregate amount of Prepetition Lender Claims and
all Allowed Other General Unsecured Claims against such Debtor
Non-Propco. Holders of Prepetition Lender Claims shall receive
Liquidating Trust Interests (Non-Propco) evidencing the right to
receive any such Distributions that cannot be made as of the
Effective Date.

Class 9 consists of Other General Unsecured Claims against such
Debtor Non-Propco. After payment in full of all A/P/S Claims and
Secured Prepetition Lender Non-Propco Claims, any remaining Cash at
each Debtor Non-Propco shall be distributed on a pro rata basis to
the Prepetition Agent (on account of the Prepetition Lender Claims)
and Holders of Allowed Other General Unsecured Claims until such
Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim are paid in full. Such pro
rata share shall be a fraction where the numerator shall be the
amount of the Allowed Other General Unsecured Claim and the
denominator the sum of the aggregate amount of Prepetition Lender
Claims and all Allowed Other General Unsecured Claims against such
Debtor Non-Propco.

On the Effective Date, the Holders of the EH REIT Equity Interests
shall be entitled to receive contingent Liquidating Trust Interests
(Non-Propco) and shall be entitled to a Distribution only if all
Holders of Allowed Claims against EH REIT have been paid in full.

                  Allocation of Sale Proceeds

With respect to each Debtor Propco, the portion of the proceeds
from the Sale Transaction shall be deemed allocated to such Debtor
Propco based on its Gross Sale Proceeds Percentage. Any other
Liquidating Trust Propco Assets which are allocable to the Debtor
Propcos generally shall be deemed allocated according to the same
formula.

                          Plan Settlement

The Plans incorporate a global settlement (the "Plan Settlement"),
which reflects a good faith compromise and settlement of numerous
inter-Debtor, Debtor-creditor, and intercreditor issues, including
issues regarding substantive consolidation, the allocation of sale
proceeds among the Liquidating Debtors, the validity and
enforceability of Intercompany Claims, the allocation of
Administrative Expense Claims, funding of the wind-down of the
Singapore Debtors, and the treatment of Claims held by Entities
that do not have contractual privity with the Liquidating Debtors.

As part of the Plan Settlement, the Prepetition Lender Claims are
also being Allowed in each Plan, on a joint and several basis
against each Liquidating Debtor, in an aggregate amount of no less
than $380,513,355, and the exercise of the Lender Setoff Rights are
being approved in each of the Plans. As a condition to the Plan
Settlement, the Guaranteed Prepetition Agent Distribution and the
Guaranteed Other GUC Distribution shall be paid on the Effective
Date, which must occur on or before December 31, 2021.

The Plan Settlement is designed to achieve a reasonable economic
settlement of disputed Claims against the Liquidating Debtors and
an efficient resolution of the Chapter 11 Cases. The entry of the
Confirmation Order shall constitute the Bankruptcy Court's approval
of the Plan Settlement, and the Bankruptcy Court's findings shall
constitute its determination that such compromises and settlements
are in the best interests of the Debtors, their Estates, their
creditors, and other parties-in-interest, and are fair, equitable,
and within the range of reasonableness.

"Liquidating Trust Propco Assets" means (a) all property of the
Debtor Propco Estates including the Sale Transaction Proceeds and
Debtor Propco Causes of Action and (b) funds held in non-Restricted
Bank Accounts of the Liquidating Debtors (other than the Singapore
Debtors' accounts at DBS Bank) as presented on page 1 of Schedule
1-A: Bank Reconciliation of Debtors' Monthly Operating Reports on
the Effective Date, including (i) the Sompo America Insurance
Company "Working Fund" (Account *82EO) account in the Debtor Name-
Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment Trust, and (ii) the net
proceeds from the sale of real property owned by Non-Debtor
Affiliate 14315 Midway Road Addison LLC ("Non-Debtor Dallas") to
which any Liquidating Debtor is entitled (x) in an amount
sufficient to repay the postpetition Intercompany Claims of the
Debtor Propco Estates against Non-Debtor Dallas, and (y) with
respect to any such remaining net sale proceeds thereafter, the
next $750,000 to be distributed to the Prepetition Agent on account
of the Prepetition Lender Claims, and any such remaining net sale
proceeds thereafter to be included in Liquidating Trust Propco
Assets.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Plan of Liquidation dated
November 01, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3GQWqln from
Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., claims agent.

Co-Counsel to the Debtors:

     PAUL HASTINGS LLP
     Luc A. Despins, Esq.
     G. Alexander Bongartz, Esq.
     Shlomo Maza, Esq.
     200 Park Avenue
     New York, New York 10166
     Telephone: (212) 318-6000
     Facsimile: (212) 319-4090
     E-mail: lucdespins@paulhastings.com     
             alexbongartz@paulhastings.com
             shlomomaza@paulhastings.com

     COLE SCHOTZ P.C.
     Seth Van Aalten, Esq.
     G. David Dean, Esq.
     500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1410
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Telephone: (302) 652-3131
     Facsimile: (302) 574-2103
     E-mail: svanaalten@coleschotz.com
             ddean@coleschotz.com

                     About Eagle Hospitality Group

Eagle Hospitality Trust -- https://eagleht.com/ -- is a hospitality
stapled group comprising Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment
Trust and Eagle Hospitality Business Trust. Based in Singapore,
Eagle H-REIT is established with the principal investment strategy
of investing on a long-term basis in a diversified portfolio of
income-producing real estate, which is used primarily for
hospitality or hospitality-related purposes as well as real
estate-related assets in connection with the foregoing, with an
initial focus on the United States.

EHT US1, Inc. and 26 affiliates, including 15 LLC entities that
each owns hotels in the U.S., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-10036) on Jan. 18, 2021.

EHT US1 estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Paul Hastings LLP and Cole Schotz P.C. as their
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting Inc. as restructuring advisor,
and Moelis & Company LLC as an investment banker.  Rajah & Tann
Singapore LLP and Walkers serve as Singapore Law counsel and Cayman
Law counsel, respectively.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. is the
claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 4, 2021.  The committee tapped Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP as bankruptcy counsel, Morris James
LLP as Delaware counsel, and Province, LLC as financial advisor.
LVM Law Chambers LLC serves as the Debtor's Singapore law conflicts
counsel.

David M. Klauder, Esq., is the fee examiner appointed in the
Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  Thomas D. Bielli, Esq., at Bielli &
Klauder, LLC, is the fee examiner's legal counsel.


EHT US1: EHT Asset Denied Further Extension to File Appeal Notice
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
denied the Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Notice of
Appeal filed by EHT Asset Management, LLC, Taylor Woods, and Howard
Wu.  EHT Asset et al. are defendants in the adversary proceeding
captioned Urban Commons Queensway, LLC, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. EHT
Asset Management, LLC, Taylor Woods, Howard Wu, Defendants,
Appellants, Adv. Pro. No. 21-50476 (CSS)(Bankr. D. Del.).  They
sought an extension of the time for filing a notice of appeal of
the Court's Order Granting Summary Judgment Pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure
7056, entered on September 14, 2021.

On July 2, 2021, the Defendants' former counsel filed its motion
for leave to withdraw as counsel to the "Urban Commons Parties,"
including the Defendants.  Rather than responding to the Summary
Judgment Motion on its merits, on July 12, 2021, the deadline for
Defendants to submit a response, the Defendants filed a motion for
extension of time, seeking an extension to file any opposition to
the Summary Judgment Motion until Defendants had retained
substitute counsel.

On August 12, 2021, the Court held a hearing on the Withdrawal
Motion. No replacement counsel or other representative of the
Defendants appeared at the hearing. The Court granted the
Withdrawal Motion on the record at the hearing and stated that the
Defendants would be given no further adjournments of deadlines in
these cases on account of not having counsel.

The Court pointed out that the Plaintiff will be prejudiced by the
requested extension of time. Over 16 months have passed since the
Defendants received the PPP loan amount and have refused to return
such amounts to the Plaintiff. Additionally, it reopens litigation
that has been decided by the Court and begins an appellate process
for which no arguments were raised in this Court (as the Defendants
failed to file any response to the Summary Judgment Motion).
Furthermore, the Defendants have raised no argument regarding their
success on the merits, which is prejudicial to the Plaintiff. At
most they have asserted a bald assertion of set-off, the Court
said.  The time and resources needed to fight against amorphous
allegations would be incredibly prejudicial (in delay and expense)
to the Plaintiff, the Court held.

Failure to find or replace counsel is not a sufficient reason for
the Defendants' delay, the Court noted.  When a "pro se litigant
fails to comply with an easily understood court-imposed deadline,
there is no basis for treating that party more generously than a
represented litigant," the Court added.  As a result, the
Defendants' neglect, if any, was not excusable, the Court
concluded.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum Order dated October 28, 2021, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/3c84fsyt from Leagle.com.

                   About Eagle Hospitality Group

Eagle Hospitality Trust -- https://eagleht.com/ -- is a hospitality
stapled group comprising Eagle Hospitality Real Estate Investment
Trust and Eagle Hospitality Business Trust. Based in Singapore,
Eagle H-REIT is established with the principal investment strategy
of investing on a long-term basis in a diversified portfolio of
income-producing real estate, which is used primarily for
hospitality or hospitality-related purposes as well as real
estate-related assets in connection with the foregoing, with an
initial focus on the United States.

EHT US1, Inc. and 26 affiliates, including 15 LLC entities that
each owns hotels in the U.S., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-10036) on Jan. 18, 2021.

EHT US1 estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors tapped Paul Hastings LLP and Cole Schotz P.C. as their
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting Inc. as restructuring advisor,
and Moelis & Company LLC as an investment banker.  Rajah & Tann
Singapore LLP and Walkers serve as Singapore Law counsel and Cayman
Law counsel, respectively.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. is the
claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 4, 2021.  The committee tapped Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP as bankruptcy counsel, Morris James
LLP as Delaware counsel, and Province, LLC as financial advisor.
LVM Law Chambers LLC serves as the Debtor's Singapore law conflicts
counsel.

David M. Klauder, Esq., is the fee examiner appointed in the
Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  Thomas D. Bielli, Esq., at Bielli &
Klauder, LLC, is the fee examiner's legal counsel.



EMPIRE RESORTS: Fitch Assigns Final 'B+' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Empire Resorts, Inc. a final 'B+'
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) following the closing of its
new senior secured notes and HoldCo loan. Fitch has also assigned a
'BB+'/'RR1' rating to Empire's senior secured notes. The Rating
Outlook is Stable.

The IDR reflects an improved standalone credit profile (SCP) pro
forma for the recapitalization. Empires 'b-' SCP is supported by
improved financial flexibility and modestly positive forecast FCF
generation, offset by its geographic concentration and high
leverage. The two-notch uplift from the SCP reflects the moderate
linkage to stronger parent, Genting Malaysia (GENM; BBB/Negative).
The Stable Outlook reflects the property's recent healthy operating
performance and regional gaming's broader solid recovery.

Empire completed a recapitalization that included $300 million of
senior secured notes, a new $75 million HoldCo loan, and a $150
million preferred equity investment by GENM.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Leverage High but Manageable: Fitch forecasts standalone gross
rent-adjusted leverage to approach 6x by 2022 (around 7x including
HoldCo debt), driven by a more conservative proposed capital
structure and a strong recovery in U.S. regional gaming from
pandemic-related disruptions. The credit profile should continue to
modestly delever through 2024, as FCF generation can support a
small level of debt paydown at the HoldCo level. EBITDAR margins
have improved sequentially since early 2021, supported by
management's privatization cost saving measures, increased
win-per-unit-per-day (WUD), and regional gaming's strong recovery.

Transaction Improves Financial Flexibility: The note issuance and
preferred equity investment eliminated near-term refinancing risk
and funded two debt service reserve accounts. In addition, FCF
generation will turn positive in 2022 and provide some additional
financial flexibility in the context of Empire's 'b-' SCP.

Empire has low maintenance capex needs, given the property's age,
and development capex related to the Orange County (OC) slots-only
property will not impact Empire's liquidity profile, as it will be
primarily funded from outside the restricted group. Fitch expects
FCF to be allocated toward HoldCo debt repayment and increasing
liquidity.

Lack of Diversification: Empire operates a single property, Resorts
World Catskills (RWC), in a competitive market that could be
subject to new supply in the medium term. Single-site casino
operators are typically rated on the low end of speculative grade,
though some can achieve higher ratings if they are in
well-protected, monopolistic type regulatory environments and have
very low leverage. Empire could become more diversified with its
second slots-only casino license slated for the nearby Orange
County, NY (OC, to open during 2022). However, given the geographic
proximity of OC the ratings benefit from opening the additional
casino will be somewhat limited.

Competitive Pressure Tempers Potential: RWC is located
approximately 90 miles from New York City, and the immediate area
around the casino is remote relative to the size of resort. RWC
competes with Atlantic City, NJ, eastern Pennsylvania, New York
City area slots-only properties and Connecticut tribal casinos for
New York metro area customers. The competitive landscape makes
significant, long-term growth in gaming revenues unlikely.
Additionally, New York State can consider incremental downstate
full-scale licenses beginning 2023, which could, in turn, increase
political momentum to try and expand gaming in New Jersey again.

Genting Relationship Positive: Fitch views Empire's association
with Genting Malaysia (BBB/Negative) positively and believes it
warrants a two-notch uplift from the 'b-' SCP under Fitch's "Parent
and Subsidiary Rating Linkage Criteria." The bottoms-up approach
focusing on the SCP differs from other Genting-owned entities that
are equalized with the parent's rating. This is primarily due to
Genting not wholly-owning Empire Resorts, as Kien Huat (the
investment vehicle of the Lim family that controls Genting) owns
51% and controls Empire. In addition, Fitch views RWC as having
less strategic value than other wholly owned Genting properties,
which are generally large-scale flagship assets that generate
materially greater cash flow.

However, RWC does have strategic value, given Genting's
reputational risk with global gaming regulators. The property is
managed by the same team as Resorts World New York and shares the
same brand. The two-notch uplift is also reinforced by demonstrated
financial support from both Kien Huat and Genting, mainly through
preferred equity investments, to ensure the prior capital
structure's debt was serviced during initial operating weakness and
to recapitalize the entity at a more conservative level than
previously contemplated.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Empire's SCP is consistent with most other single-site casino
operators, which are typically on the lower end of speculative
grade. The SCP reflects Empire's geographic concentration in a
competitive environment subject to new supply risk in the medium
term. The SCP also reflects high adjusted leverage, though more
manageable under the new capital structure, and a weaker FCF
profile than its regional gaming peers.

Fitch treats the HoldCo debt as debt of the rated entity, due to
potential enforcement of a share pledge triggering a Change of
Control at the rated entity level. Pro forma for the
recapitalization, liquidity and refinancing risk are no longer be
material concerns, which partially drove Empire's previous lower
SCP.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Fitch's assumptions build off a normalized, run-rate net
    revenue of about $310 million for RWC, supported by
    managements post-privatization initiatives and the recovery in
    U.S. regional gaming. This level of revenue is achieved during
    fiscal 2022, with fiscal 2021 lower given the lingering
    pandemic disruption in 1H21 (though this began abating during
    2Q21). Total revenue increases toward $400 million in 2023,
    which includes the first year of operations of the Orange
    County slots-only property (Fitch assumes about 20%
    cannibalization to RWC);

-- EBITDAR is $40 million in 2021, though margins reach 20% in
    the back half of 2021. EBITDAR margins increase toward low-20%
    by 2022 thanks to a large number of cost savings associated
    with taking Empire private, as well as a rationalization of
    the labor pool post-pandemic;

-- Rent is roughly $20 million per year and increases slightly
    after Orange County property opens;

-- Maintenance capex is minimal given RWC's age. Capex related to
    the OC license is funded outside of the restricted group;

-- FCF is allocated toward paying down the HoldCo note and
    building additional financial flexibility;

-- Fitch does not include any potential benefits from online
    sports betting at this time.

RECOVERY ASSUMPTIONS

The recovery analysis assumes that Empire Resorts would be
reorganized as a going-concern in bankruptcy rather than
liquidated. Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim and there
is no revolver in the capital structure.

Going-concern EBITDA of roughly $40 million is less than Fitch's
2022 estimates, which incorporates some degree of operating stress
that would cause a default scenario from sustained negative FCF.
This level of EBITDA is representative of margins in the mid-teens,
given New York's high gaming taxes and the competitive nature of
Empire's addressable market.

Since Resorts World Catskills opened in 2018, there is limited
historical performance to analyze. This EBITDA is slightly higher
than the previous going-concern EBITDA used in mid-2020 given the
now realized cost-cutting from management's initiatives and
incremental reduction in VLT gaming taxes for RWC.

Fitch applies a 6.0x EV/EBITDA multiple, which reflects the intense
competitive environment, limited track record of operations, fixed
rent costs, and less established player database relative to
larger, regional peers. This is balanced by the property's younger
age and quality, having opened in 2018. Typically Fitch will assign
5.5x-7.0x multiples to regional gaming companies depending on
diversification, competitive environment, asset quality, and
existence of meaningful leases.

Fitch also includes roughly $70 million in additional value for the
OC slot-only casino license. Since the property is not yet built,
Fitch values the license under a conservative set of assumptions as
follows: 1,200 slots; $180 win per unit per day (WUD, conservative
relative to Fitch's base case); 15% EBITDA margins, 6.0x EV/EBITDA
multiple. The WUD assumptions are characteristic of a regional
casino in a saturated market and are below Fitch's base case
assumptions for the OC property. The margin assumption takes into
account the high gaming tax associated with slot-only licenses.

Fitch forecasts a post-reorganization enterprise value of roughly
$315 million, after the deduction of expected administrative claims
of 10%. This results in a 91%-100% recovery band for the senior
secured notes, which equates to +3 notching from the IDR to 'BB+'.
Given the structural subordination of the HoldCo debt, it does not
impact the recovery analysis of the Empire senior secured notes.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Geographic diversification away from greater New York City;

-- Reductions in adjusted debt/EBITDAR toward 5.0x (includes
    HoldCo debt);

-- FCF margin exceeding 10%;

-- An increase in rating linkage with Genting Malaysia.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Adjusted debt/EBITDAR sustaining above 7.0x (includes HoldCo
    debt);

-- FCF margin approaching 0%;

-- A decrease in rating linkage with Genting Malaysia;

-- A material reduction in financial flexibility.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Empire has roughly $90 million in cash following the secured note
issuance, which includes roughly $50 million in two debt service
reserve accounts. This is sufficient in the context of marginally
positive and growing EBITDA generation and minimal maintenance
capex needs. The high initial excess cash balances offset the lack
of a revolving credit facility.

Fitch forecasts FCF to be marginally negative in 2021 and become
slightly positive thereafter. Some growth capex remains associated
with the golf course in 2022, though this is manageable. Capex
related to the OC project will be incurred outside of the
restricted group. Fitch assumes management allocates FCF toward
paydown of the HoldCo loan (within the limits of final
documentation's restricted payment carve-outs) and build additional
financial flexibility as it works toward its target of being in a
net cash position. There are no maturities until 2024.

ISSUER PROFILE

Empire Resorts, Inc. owns and operates Resorts World Catskills
(RWC), a full-scale casino located roughly 90 miles outside New
York City. The company is in the process of relocating its prior
video gaming machine (VGM, aka slots) license from Monticello, NY
to Orange County, NY.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

-- Fitch adds back non-recurring items to EBITDA. Fitch also
    includes HoldCo debt in its leverage calculation as it is
    considered debt of the rated entity per Fitch's criteria.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

The highest level of ESG credit relevance, if present, is a score
of '3'. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a
minimal credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or
to the way in which they are being managed by the entity.


ENDO INTERNATIONAL: Bankruptcy Filing One of Contingency Plans
--------------------------------------------------------------
Endo International PLC says that bankruptcy is among its
contingency plans due to opioids, and that thousands of legal
claims tied to opioids may cast doubt on its solvency, the company
said in its Nov. 5 Form 10-Q filing with the SEC.

The Company said, "We have not been able to settle most of the
opioid claims made against us and, as a result, we are exploring a
wide array of potential actions as part of our contingency
planning.  These actions could include a bankruptcy filing which,
if it were to occur, would subject us to additional risks and
uncertainties that could adversely affect our business prospects
and ability to continue as a going concern."

Since 2014, multiple U.S. states as well as other governmental
persons or entities and private plaintiffs in the U.S. and Canada
have filed suit against the Company and/or certain of its
subsidiaries, as well as various other manufacturers, distributors,
pharmacies and/or others, asserting claims relating to
defendants’ alleged sales, marketing and/or distribution
practices with respect to prescription opioid medications,
including certain of our products.

As of Oct. 28, 2021, filed cases in the U.S. include, but are not
limited to, 20 cases filed by or on behalf of states; 2,920 cases
filed by counties, cities, Native American tribes and/or other
government-related persons or entities; approximately 310 cases
filed by hospitals, health systems, unions, health and welfare
funds or other third-party payers and approximately 190 cases filed
by individuals, including but not limited to legal guardians of
children born with neonatal abstinence syndrome.  Certain of the
U.S. cases have been filed as putative class actions; to date,
however, no court has certified a litigation class.  The Canadian
cases include an action filed by British Columbia on behalf of a
proposed class of all federal, provincial and territorial
governments and agencies in Canada that paid healthcare,
pharmaceutical and treatment costs related to opioids; an action
filed in Alberta by the City of Grand Prairie, Alberta, and The
Corporation of the City of Brantford, Ontario, on behalf of a
proposed class of all local or municipal governments in Canada; an
action filed in Saskatchewan by the Peter Ballantyne Cree Nation
and the Lac La Ronge Indian Band, on behalf of a proposed class of
all First Nations communities and local or municipal governments in
Canada; and three additional putative class actions, filed in
Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia, seeking relief on behalf of
Canadian residents who were prescribed and/or consumed opioid
medications.

"[W]e and other manufacturers of prescription opioid medications
have been, and will likely continue to be, subject to negative
publicity and press, which could harm our brand and the demand for
our products.  Certain other manufacturers of prescription opioid
medications have publicly commenced, or announced their intention
to commence, cases to seek the protections under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code to address the claims being asserted against such
manufacturers in these opioid lawsuits and others may do so or take
similar measures in the future. We cannot assure you how any such
decisions will impact our company."

                    About Endo International PLC

Endo (NASDAQ: ENDP) is an Ireland-domiciled specialty
pharmaceutical company. Endo International plc was incorporated in
Ireland in 2013 as a private limited company and re-registered
effective Feb. 18, 2014 as a public limited company. Endo
International plc is a holding company that conducts business
through its operating subsidiaries.

As of June 30, 2021, the Company had $9.20 billion in total assets,
$1.41 billion in total current liabilities, $22.93 million in
deferred income taxes, $8.05 billion in long-term debt, $32.87
million in operating lease liabilities (less current portion),
$305.46 million in other liabilities, and a total shareholders'
deficit of $617.04 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 6, 2021, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its long-term issuer credit rating on Endo International PLC to
'CCC+' from 'B-' and removed the rating from CreditWatch, where S&P
placed it with negative implications on Aug. 25, 2021.  The outlook
is negative.  S&P said the negative outlook reflects the potential
for an event of default within the next 12 months stemming from
opioid-related litigation or the possibility of a distressed
exchange.


EXPRESS GRAIN: Taps Dennis Gerrard of CR3 Partners as CRO
---------------------------------------------------------
Express Grain Terminals, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Mississippi to employ
Dennis Gerrard, a partner at CR3 Partners, LLC, as its chief
restructuring officer.

The CRO's services include:

   a. providing the Debtor temporary employees to assist with the
restructuring efforts and completion of bankruptcy-related
reporting requirements;

   b. establishing a communication protocol with stakeholders;

   c. assisting in the preparation and review of financial
projections and cash flow budgets, including implementing cash
conservation strategies, tactics and processes where appropriate
and feasible;

   d. assisting in the preparation and review of reports or filings
as required by the court or the Office of the U.S. Trustee,
including schedules of assets and liabilities, statements of
financial affairs and monthly operating reports;

   e. assisting in the preparation of a plan of reorganization and
related documents;

   f. assisting the Debtor and its legal counsel with the
preparation for hearings, testimony, creditor meetings, and
creation of supporting exhibits and motions;

   g. assisting the Debtors and its legal counsel in developing
litigation strategy and related analysis;

   h. identifying liquidity needs, including determining potential
debtor-in-possession funding requirements;

   i. assisting with evaluating executory agreements as necessary;
and

   j. performing other necessary restructuring advisory services.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Partners               $725 to $850 per hour
     Directors              $495 to $675 per hour
     Managers               $425 to $495 per hour
     Associates             $350 per hour

CR3 Partners will also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Mr. Gerrard disclosed in a court filing that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Dennis Gerrard
     CR3 Partners, LLC
     13355 Noel Road, Suite 2005
     Dallas, TX 75240
     Tel: (800) 728-7176

                   About Express Grain Terminals

Express Grain Terminals, LLC, a Greenwood, Mississippi-based
producer of soy products such as oil and biodiesel, filed a
petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Miss. Case  No. 21-
11832) on Sept. 29, 2021, listing up to $50 million in assets and
up to $100 million in liabilities.  John Coleman, member, signed
the petition.

Judge Selene D. Maddox oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Craig M. Geno, Esq., at The Law Offices of Craig
M. Geno, PLLC as its legal counsel and CR3 Partners, LLC as its
restructuring advisor.  Dennis Gerrard, a partner at CR3 Partners,
serves as the Debtor's chief restructuring officer.


FENDER MUSICAL: Moody's Rates New $375MM Secured Term Loan B 'B2'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 rating to Fender Musical
Instruments Corporation's new $375 million senior secured term loan
B due 2028. Fender's B1 Corporate Family Rating and B1-PD
Probability of Default Rating were affirmed. The rating outlook is
stable.

Proceeds from the new term loan, along with about $59 million of
balance sheet cash, will be used to fund the purchase of
PreSonusAudio Electronics, Inc. (PreSonus) and refinance the
company's existing debt in full. Fender will also replace its
existing $85 million asset-based revolver (not-rated) with a new
$100 million senior secured asset-based revolver (not-rated). The
existing $85 million ABL is currently undrawn and is expected the
new $100 million ABL will not be drawn at the time the transaction
closes. No rating action was taken on Fender's existing term loan.
Moody's expects to withdraw the B2 rating on this term loan due
2025 once the transaction closes.

PreSonus is a designer and manufacturer of audio-recording and
live-sound software, hardware and related accessories used for
recording, sound reinforcement, broadcast, sound design and
internet audio. The company has about $100 million in revenue
compared to Fender's annual revenue of about $900 million.

"Moody's has a favorable view of Fender's acquisition of PreSonus,
an established company with highly related product offerings,"
stated Keith Foley, a Senior Vice President at Moody's. "The
acquisition is also consistent with the company's digital growth
plans and continuing industry trend towards home recording," added
Foley. PreSonus' earnings increased meaningfully during the
pandemic because of higher sales with individuals spending more
time at home, as well as good cost efficiency. There is some risk
that sales and earnings will slip as consumers return to more
out-of-home activities, but Moody's believes the company's solid
market position and good product quality will allow it to
capitalize on the longer-term home recording trend.

Although absolute debt increases as result of the transaction,
Fender's debt-to-EBITDA is expected to remain below Moody's
downgrade factor of 4.0x. Debt-to-EBITDA for the latest 12-month
period ended 7/4/2021 was 2.6x, and will increase to an estimated
3.6x on a pro forma basis for the PreSonus acquisition.

The refinancing will also push out Fender's debt maturity profile.

The new credit facilities are considered covenant-lite in nature
and have similar terms to Fender's existing credit facilities. The
asset-based loan collateral consists of a first priority lien on
the company's accounts receivable and inventory and a second
priority lien on fixed assets and intangibles. The term loan has a
first lien on PP&E, intangibles and substantially all other assets,
except the asset-based loan collateral, and a second lien on the
asset-based loan collateral.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by the action:

New Assignments:

Issuer: Fender Musical Instruments Corporation

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B2 (LGD4)

Ratings Affirmed:

Issuer: Fender Musical Instruments Corporation

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed at B1

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed at B1-PD

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Fender Musical Instruments Corporation

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Fender's B1 Corporate Family Rating reflects the company's strong
brand awareness. The Fender name is supported by the long-standing
reputation and quality of its guitars and product innovation. This
provides strong brand name recognition and significant barriers to
entry for guitars, its flagship product. Fender is also one of the
largest musical instrument companies in the world. Approximately
half of the company's net sales are generated outside of North
America, with about a third coming from Europe and remainder of
approximate 15% coming from Asia. Fender's financial policy
reflects use of moderate financial leverage to provide flexibility
given its high sensitivity to economic downturns and periodic use
of debt to finance acquisitions. In addition to the uncertainty
caused by the coronavirus pandemic, key credit risks include the
nonessential, highly discretionary nature of consumer spending on
musical instruments, Fender's relatively narrow product focus, and
significant customer concentration. Guitar Center, Inc. the largest
private retailer of music products in the United States represents
about 17% of Fender's net sales.

The coronavirus outbreak and the government measures put in place
to contain it continue to disrupt economies and credit markets
across sectors and regions. Although an economic recovery is
underway, it is tenuous, and its continuation will be closely tied
to containment of the virus. As a result, there is uncertainty
around Moody's forecasts. Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak
as a social risk under Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial
implications for public health and safety. The consumer durables
industry is one of the sectors most meaningfully affected by the
coronavirus because of exposure to discretionary spending.

Moody's expects Fender will continue to maintain a modest financial
policy in terms of leverage and dividends. Debt-to-EBITDA has
consistently remained below 4.0x and Moody's projects leverage will
remain below 4.0x over the next year. Additionally, the company has
not paid dividends following a $100 million debt financed dividend
that occurred at the end of fiscal 2018. The company also repaid
$50 million that was borrowed on the term loan as a precautionary
measure to bolster liquidity at the start of the pandemic.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The stable outlook reflects increasing customer demand across all
of Fender's product lines as individuals pursue leisure activities
close to home. As a result, Moody's expect the company to generate
at least $40 million of positive free cash flow and maintain
moderate leverage and very good liquidity.

A ratings upgrade is unlikely given the continuing volatility
related to the coronavirus. An upgrade would require a high degree
of confidence on Moody's part that consumer demand for musical
instrument products is sustained at currently high levels, and that
Fender continue to demonstrate the ability and willingness to
generate strong positive free cash flow, maintain good liquidity,
and continue to operate with a debt/EBITDA level at below 3.0x.

Ratings could be downgraded if Moody's anticipates earnings will
decline or liquidity will deteriorate because of actions to contain
the spread of the virus or reductions in discretionary consumer
spending. Separate from general operating conditions, Fenders
ratings could be downgraded if debt-to-EBITDA is sustained above
4.0x or the company decides to pursue a more aggressive financial
policy for any reason.

As proposed, the new first lien credit facilities are expected to
provide covenant flexibility that if utilized could negatively
impact creditors. Notable terms include the following: incremental
debt capacity up to the sum of the greater of $115 million and 75%
of pro forma trailing four quarter consolidated EBITDA, plus
unlimited amounts subject to a senior secured leverage no greater
than 4.0x (if pari passu secured). No portion of the incremental
may be incurred with an earlier maturity than the initial term
loan.

Non-wholly-owned subsidiaries are not required to provide
guarantees; dividends or transfers resulting in partial ownership
of subsidiary guarantors could jeopardize guarantees, with no
explicit protective provisions limiting such guarantee releases.
The credit agreement provides some limitations on up-tiering
transactions, including the requirement that all affected lenders
must consent to the reduction of any of the voting percentages,
modification to the pro rata sharing provisions and payment
waterfall, and the release of all or substantially all of the
collateral or guarantors.

The proposed terms and the final terms of the credit agreement may
be materially different.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Consumer
Durables published in September 2021.

Fender develops, manufactures, and distributes musical instruments
to wholesale and retail outlets throughout the world. The company's
product portfolio includes fretted instruments (comprised of
electric, acoustic, and bass guitars and ukuleles), guitar
amplifiers, audio systems, guitar pedals, other guitar accessories,
and digital applications centered around musical education.
Portfolio of brands include Fender, Squier, Bigsby, Jackson, and
Charvel. The company also is a licensee of the Gretsch and Eddie
Van Halen brands. Fender is majority owned by Servco Pacific
Capital. The company generated $842 million of net sales for the
latest 12-month period ended 7/4/2021.


FORTRESS INVESTMENT: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDRs) of Foundation Holdco LP, the parent company and successor to
Fortress Investment Group LLC, and its rated subsidiaries
(collectively Fortress) at 'BB'. Fitch has also affirmed Fortress'
Short-Term IDRs at 'B' and FinCo I LLC's senior secured debt rating
at 'BB'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The rating actions have been taken as part of a periodic peer
review of the alternative investment manager (IM) industry, which
is comprised of 11 publicly rated global firms.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDRs AND SENIOR DEBT

The rating affirmations reflect Fortress' established position as a
global alternative IM, experienced management, stable cash flow
generation, moderate management fee exposure to net asset value
(NAV) movements, improving operating margins and declining
leverage.

Rating constraints include elevated leverage, albeit declining,
limited revenue diversity relative to more highly rated peers,
investment concentrations, historical underperformance in certain
funds and business segments and a fully secured funding profile.

Rating constraints for alternative IMs include key person risk,
which is institutionalized throughout many limited partnership
agreements; reputational risk, which can impact the company's
ability to raise future funds; and legal and regulatory risk.

At June 30, 2021, Fortress had $53.9 billion in assets under
management (AUM), up 18.3% from 2Q20. Credit private equity (PE)
funds represented the largest segment, accounting for 65.3% of
Fortress' AUM and 42.2% of management fees over the TTM ended June
30, 2021. Fortress' traditional PE AUM represented just 2.6% of AUM
at 2Q21. Fortress' increased focus on credit funds has resulted in
lower AUM diversity relative to alternative IM peers.

Fortress raised $11.9 billion of capital during 2020, representing
its strongest fundraising year. Capital raising slowed in 2021,
with $3.1 billion raised in 1H21. Fortress had approximately $19.3
billion of dry powder at 2Q21. While investing this amount of
capital could take some time, Fortress' pace of deployment has
increased since the onset of the coronavirus pandemic.

Fortress' fee-related EBITDA (FEBITDA) margin for the TTM ended
June 30, 2021 was 30.5%, which was up from 24.7% for the TTM ended
June 30, 2020 and at the low end of Fitch's 'a' category benchmark
range of 30%-50% for alternative IMs. Since Fortress does not
report all incentive income compensation separately, which Fitch
adds back to FEBITDA, Fitch believes Fitch-calculated FEBITDA for
Fortress is understated.

Management fees in 1H21 increased 12.3%, yoy, largely driven by an
increase in fee-generating AUM (FAUM) in credit PE funds and an
increase in NAV in credit hedge funds. Fitch believes there is good
forward visibility into Fortress' management fees as around 69% of
Fortress' AUM at 2Q21 was in permanent equity or fund structures
that mature in five or more years.

Incentive income increased 90.7% in 1H21, yoy, driven largely by
incentive income from credit hedge funds. Fortress had $2.1 billion
of undistributed incentive income, net of intrinsic clawback but
gross of compensation under employee profit sharing arrangements,
the realization of which would contribute to additional cash flow
generation. However, realized incentive income can be volatile.

Fortress' leverage (debt-to-FEBITDA) was 6.5x on a TTM basis at
June 30, 2021, which is down from 9.9x a year ago but above Fitch's
'bb' benchmark range of 4.0x-6.0x for alternative IMs. Since
Fortress does not report all incentive income compensation
separately, Fitch also assesses leverage by assuming a 35% FEBITDA
margin (based on historical margins). On this basis, adjusted
leverage was 5.7x for the TTM ended June 30, 2021, down from 7.0x a
year ago. Fitch believes leverage could continue to decline over
the outlook horizon given management fee growth and the potential
for additional debt prepayments.

FEBITDA divided by interest expense was 4.3x on a TTM basis through
2Q21 and 5.0x assuming a 35% FEBITDA margin. Fitch expects
Fortress' interest coverage ratio to remain within or above the
'bb' category benchmark range of 2.0x-4.0x.

Fortress' liquidity was adequate at 2Q21, with $483.7 million of
cash and $88.1 of availability under its revolving loan facility
and no near-term debt maturities. Fortress had remaining capital
commitments that can be drawn by the funds on demand of $291.7
million at 2Q21, of which $158.0 million is related to funds that
are still in their investment or commitment period.

Fortress has not paid any distributions to SoftBank Group Corp.
(SBG) since 2018, which Fitch believes is consistent with the
company's focus on reducing leverage; however, the long-term
distribution policy is unclear.

The Stable Outlook reflects Fitch's expectations that Fortress will
maintain adjusted leverage below 6.0x, solid FEBITDA margins and
sufficient liquidity to meet debt service requirements and
co-investment commitments to funds. The Outlook also reflects
Fitch's belief that Fortress will continue to grow/retain FAUM
through the raising of new and expansion of existing fund
strategies and continued capital deployment.

A Long-Term IDR of 'BB' corresponds to a Short-Term IDR of 'B'
according to Fitch's "Non-Bank Financial Institutions Rating
Criteria" dated Feb. 28, 2020.

The secured debt rating is equalized with the Long-Term IDR,
reflecting Fitch's expectation of average recovery prospects for
the debt class in a stress scenario.

SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES

Rated subsidiaries of Foundation Holdco LP include FinCo I LLC,
which indirectly owns Fortress Investment Group LLC and is the
issuer of the secured term loan. Rated subsidiaries also include
FIG Parent, LLC and FinCo I Intermediate HoldCo LLC, which, along
with Foundation Holdco LP, serve as joint and several guarantors of
the secured term loan and are shell holding companies above
Fortress Investment Group LLC. The IDRs of each entity are
equalized with those of Foundation Holdco LP.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDRs AND SENIOR DEBT

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Adjusted leverage approaching 5.0x, continued FAUM growth,
    increased FAUM and revenue diversity, enhanced funding
    flexibility through access to unsecured debt and/or more
    diversified funding sources, and maintenance of solid
    liquidity levels.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- A sustained increase in adjusted leverage above 6.0x, a
    material decline in the FEBITDA margin, a decline in interest
    coverage below 2.0x and a weaker liquidity profile;

-- Deterioration in the credit profile of SBG combined with
    inadequate limitations on SBG's ability to extract liquidity
    from Fortress to the detriment of its debt holders, could also
    pressure Fortress' ratings, although this is not anticipated
    under the firm's current distribution policy.

The Short-Term IDR is primarily sensitive to the Long-Term IDR and
would be expected to move in tandem. At higher rating levels for
the Long-Term IDR, the Short-Term IDR would also become sensitive
to Fitch's assessment of Fortress' funding, liquidity and
coverage.

The secured debt rating is equalized with the Long-Term IDR and
would be expected to move in tandem.

SUBSIDIARY AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES

The IDRs of FIG Parent, LLC, FinCo I LLC, FinCo I Intermediate
HoldCo LLC and Fortress Investment Group LLC are equalized with the
IDRs of Foundation Holdco LP and are, therefore, expected to move
in tandem.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and
Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


FROZEN FOODS: Seeks Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov. 19
-------------------------------------------------------
Frozen Foods Partners, LLC, d/b/a Gourmet Express, LLC, d/b/a
Gourmet Express asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York for authority to use cash collateral and
provide adequate protection to secured creditor Iron Horse Credit
LLC.

The Debtor requires the immediate use of Cash Collateral to avoid
immediate and irreparable harm to the Debtor, its estate and
creditors.

Immediately upon filing of the petition, the Debtor, through its
proposed counsel, communicated with the Lender's counsel in order
to begin discussions and negotiations concerning the consensual use
of the Cash Collateral. It is the Debtor's expectation that they
will negotiate and work together to enter into a mutually
acceptable stipulation or consent Order which will be submitted to
the Court for its consideration on or before, or promptly
following, the hearing date in connection with the Motion. The
Debtor's proposed budget which it intends to memorialize in a
stipulation seeks the Debtor's use of the Cash Collateral through
November 19, 2021.

The Debtor leases more than 300,000 square feet of space used as
its food manufacturing plant located at 600 Greene Dr., Greenville,
Kentucky 42345, of which less than 50,000 square feet is presently
in active use by the Debtor.

On December 16, 2019, the Debtor entered into a Cash and Security
Agreement with the Lender, pursuant to which the Lender extended a
revolving $1,750,000 inventory loan to the Debtor. The Agreement
provided for a contract rate of 13.8% and a default rate 27.6%. The
debt incurred by the Debtor was to mature 24 months following
closing on the transaction.

By letter dated September 30, 2021, the Lender claimed that the
termination of Juan Carlos Pena as chief executive officer was an
event of default and preserved its rights, but did not immediately
demand payment of any the Debtor's obligations. On October 19, 2021
the Lender transmitted a letter to the Debtor in which the Lender
demanded repayment of $2,224,429 as a consequence of Mr. Pena's
termination. On October 21, 2021, the Lender transmitted a letter
to the Debtor in which it asserted a further default arising from
the non-payment of the amount demanded in its October 19th
correspondence. On October 23, 2021, the Lender provided notice to
the Debtor of its intention to dispose of its collateral on or
after November 2, 2021, without specifying which collateral would
be liquidated and where the sale would take place. That proceeding
has been stayed by the Debtor's filing.

The Debtor believes the aggregate amount due the Lender is
approximately $1,500,000 and that the value of the Lender's
collateral far exceeds the amount due it by either the Debtor's
calculations or the amount demanded in its letter of October 19,
2021.

During the first half 2020 sales for the Debtor reached a record of
about $17,500,000. The Debtor was profitable for that half as the
COVID-19 outbreak helped drive increased sales for quality frozen
foods. For the second half of 2020 sales decreased to about
$14,500,000, with a noticeable decrease in sales and profit towards
the end of the year when prior management significantly changed the
recipe of several of the core products to cut costs by replacing
the "use as you like" sauce in each bag with a one-size "pellet."
The sales for the 2020 year closed at $31,785,830, resulting in a
net loss of $510,863.

During the first half of 2021 sales dropped precipitously to
$10,552,149 primarily due to the recipe change, the loss of a
co-packer for several SKU’s made off-site, and the Debtor
absorbing price increases across its supply chain since inception
without passing them onto its customers through increases in the
prices for which its goods are sold, which collectively resulted in
a loss for the half-year of $1,949,028.

Cash flow challenges starting in the third quarter of 2021 caused
the Board of Managers to contact several turnaround experts. In
August 2021 the Board of Managers was introduced to Jeff
Lichtenstein and Mike Goose of Next In Natural, a boutique food
management company for an assessment of the business challenges.

Since the termination of Carlos Pena, First Industrial has seized
approximately $230,000 of the Debtor’s $250,000 security deposit
to satisfy the Debtor's rent arrears, transmitted purported
termination and eviction notices, and appeared at the Kentucky
premises with other creditors.

As adequate protection for the Debtor's use of cash collateral, the
Debtor proposes to grant the Lender a replacement lien against and
security interest in all assets of the Debtor (excluding Chapter 5
causes of action and recoveries, if any), to the extent that such
liens existed immediately prior to the Filing Date and for any
diminution in value. Such replacement lien provides the Lender with
adequate protection.

To the extent such post-petition collateral consists of the
proceeds of PACA obligations, the Replacement Liens will be
subordinate to such trust obligations.

The Debtor further submits that based upon the value of its assets,
there is substantial equity in such assets over and above secured
liens. Accordingly, the Debtor submits that the Lender is
adequately protected. The Debtor, however, reserves all rights with
respect hereto, and to present evidence in support thereof, as it
relates to the necessity to provide alternate forms, if any, of
adequate protection to the Lender.

A copy of the motion and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3mNllhE from PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provided for total expenses, on a weekly basis, as
follows:

     $270,682 for the week starting November 1, 2021;
     $170,846 for the week starting November 8, 2021; and
     $135,200 for the week starting November 15, 2021.

                 About Frozen Foods Partners, LLC

Frozen Foods Partners, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company,
which was established in 2015. Frozen Foods is a consumer products
company engaged in the production, distribution and marketing of
frozen skillet meals under multiple consumer brands. It offers a
diversified portfolio of frozen products including meal kits,
skillet meals, combination of proteins, sauces, pastas and
vegetables, Asian and Mediterranean cuisines, as well as authentic
Latin specialties. Its products offer a quality dining solution for
working families and young adults. Its brands include Gourmet
Dining, Rosetto, La Sabrosa, and Tru Earth, which can presently be
found in many retailers, including Associated Grocers and
SuperValu, as well as private label brands.

Frozen Foods sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-11897) on November 1,
2021. In the petition signed by Jeffrey Lichtenstein as chief
executive officer, the debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Martin Glenn oversees the case.

Adam P. Wofse, Esq., at Lamonica Herbst and Maniscalco, LLP, is the
Debtor's counsel.



GLAUKOM LLC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------
Debtor: Glaukom, LLC
        6344 South 900 East
        Salt Lake City, UT 84121

Business Description: Glaukom, LLC is an ophthalmology practice
                      located in Salt Lake City.  The Company's
                      services range from LASIK, cataract surgery,
                      glaucoma management and surgery, to
                      comprehensive, routine, and diabetic eye
                      exams.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Utah

Case No.: 21-24757

Judge: Hon. Joel T. Marker

Debtor's Counsel: Andres Diaz, Esq.
                  DIAZ & LARSEN
                  757 East South Temple, Suite 201
                  Salt Lake City, UT 84102
                  Tel: (801) 596-1661
                  Fax: (801) 359-6803
                  Email: courtmail@adexpresslaw.com

Total Assets as of Dec. 31, 2020: $547,603

Total Liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2020: $1,015,696

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Gregory A. Christiansen as manager.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/M57IESY/Glaukom_LLC__utbke-21-24757__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Unsecureds Will Get 100% in Prepackaged Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
GTT Communications, Inc. and Its Debtor Affiliates filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York a
Disclosure Statement regarding the Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11
Plan of Reorganization dated October 31, 2021.

The Plan implements a pre-packaged restructuring agreed to by and
among the Debtors and the Debtors' major stakeholders—including
Holders of more than 84% in amount of the 2018 Credit Facility
Claims and Holders of more than 76% in amount of the Senior Notes
Claims. On September 16, 2021, the Company consummated the I
Squared Infrastructure Sale and prepaid approximately $1.673
billion in funded debt. Prior to the consummation of the I Squared
Infrastructure Sale, the Company had approximately $3.695 billion
in principal amount of funded debt.

As of the date of this Disclosure Statement, the Company has
approximately $2.015 billion in principal amount of funded debt.
Through a combination of the distribution of proceeds from the I
Squared Infrastructure Sale and the balance sheet deleveraging
contemplated by the Plan, the Company will reduce its funded debt
burden from approximately $2.015 billion to a projected $929
million as of the Effective Date of the Plan.

The anticipated benefits of the Plan include, without limitation
the following:

   * conversion of approximately $1.440 billion in aggregate
principal amount of 2018 Credit Facility Claims to a combination of
(i) 88% of the New Equity Interests, subject to dilution by the
Management Incentive Plan and New Equity Interests issuable upon
exercise of the Noteholder Warrants and/or the Equityholder
Warrants (the "Secured Claims New Equity Interests"), (ii) a new
senior secured term loan facility (the "New GTT Term Loan
Facility") and (iii) certain Cash distributions;

   * conversion of approximately $575 million in aggregate
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the
Petition Date, of the Senior Notes Claims to (i) 12% of the New
Equity Interests, subject to dilution by the Management Incentive
Plan and New Equity Interests issuable upon exercise of the
Noteholder Warrants and/or Equityholder Warrants (the "Noteholder
New Equity Interests") and (ii) warrants exercisable for 30% of the
New Equity Interests, which will have a 5 year term and an initial
aggregate exercise price based on an equity value of the
Reorganized Parent that, as of the Effective Date, provides for
payment in full of the Allowed amount of the aggregate 2018 Credit
Facility Claims that are to be distributed to Holders of Senior
Notes Claims on account of such Claims pursuant to and in
accordance with the Plan and the Noteholder Warrant Agreement (the
"Noteholder Warrants");

   * payment in full, in Cash, of General Unsecured Claims in the
ordinary course of business;

   * distribution of the warrants exercisable for 4.9% of the New
Equity Interests, which will have a 5 year term and an initial
aggregate exercise price based on a $2.8 billion enterprise value
of the Reorganized Parent (in each case, subject to dilution and on
terms and conditions more fully set forth in the Equityholder
Warrant Term Sheet and applicable definitive documentation) that
are to be distributed to Holders of Existing GTT Equity Interests
on account of such Existing GTT Equity Interests pursuant to and in
accordance with the Plan and the Equityholder Warrant Agreement
(the "Equityholder Warrants");

   * the Debtors' prompt emergence from chapter 11; and

   * access to capital in the form of (i) the New GTT Term Loan
Facility in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $854
million and (ii) a new cash flow or asset-based revolving credit
facility of up to $75 million in the aggregate on terms acceptable
to the Required Consenting Creditors ("Exit Revolving Credit
Facility").

The Plan provides for a comprehensive restructuring of the
prepetition obligations, preserves the going-concern value of the
Debtors' businesses, maximizes creditor and interest holder
recoveries, and protects the jobs of the Debtors' invaluable
employees. To evidence their support of the Debtors' restructuring,
the Debtors and their key stakeholders executed the Restructuring
Support Agreement.

The Plan provides for the treatment of Claims against, and
Interests in, the Debtors through, among other things: (a) the
issuance of the New Equity Interests; (b) the issuance of the
Noteholder Warrants and the Equityholder Warrants; (c) the
incurrence of the New GTT Term Loan Facility and (d) Cash
distributions, as applicable. As more fully described in the Plan:

     * Each Holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claim will receive
(a) payment in full in Cash, payable on the later of the Effective
Date and the date that is 10 Business Days after the date on which
such Claim becomes an Allowed Claim, in each case, or as soon as
reasonably practicable thereafter, (b) reinstatement of such
Holder's Allowed Claim, or (c) such other treatment so as to render
such Holder's Allowed Claim Unimpaired;

     * Each Holder of an Allowed 2018 Credit Facility Claim will
receive (a) its pro rata share of and interest in the following:
(i) the New GTT Term Loan Facility, (ii) the Secured Claims New
Equity Interests, (iii) the Noteholder New Common Equity Investment
Cash (if any), (iv) any Excess Cash, and (v) the I Squared Deferred
Consideration and (b) Cash in an amount equal to all accrued but
unpaid prepetition interest and, pursuant to the Cash Collateral
Orders, postpetition interest with respect to such 2018 Credit
Facility Claim at the applicable default interest rate under the
Credit Agreement from the Petition Date through and including the
Effective Date;

     * Each Holder of an Allowed Senior Notes Claim will receive
its Pro Rata share of (a) the Noteholder New Equity Interests, (b)
the Noteholder Warrants and (c) the right to participate in the
Noteholder New Common Equity Investment;

     * Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claims will
receive (a) satisfaction of its General Unsecured Claim in full in
the ordinary course of business in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the particular transaction and/or agreement giving
rise to such Allowed General Unsecured Claim or (b) payment in full
in Cash on the date such General Unsecured Claim becomes payable as
if the Chapter 11 Cases had not been commenced; provided, that
notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary claims for
rejection damages in connection with any rejected non-residential
real property lease;

     * Intercompany Interests will, at the option of the Debtors
(with the consent of the Required Consenting Creditors, which
consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) or the Reorganized
Debtors, as applicable, be adjusted, Reinstated, or canceled and
released without any distribution; and

     * Each Holder of an Allowed Existing GTT Equity Interest will
receive its Pro Rata share of the Equityholder Warrants.

Class 5 consists of General Unsecured Claims. Each Holder thereof
shall receive (a) satisfaction of its General Unsecured Claim in
full in the ordinary course of business in accordance with the
terms and conditions of the particular transaction and/or agreement
giving rise to such Allowed General Unsecured Claim or (b) payment
in full in Cash on the date such General Unsecured Claim becomes
payable as if the Chapter 11 Cases had not been commenced. This
Class will receive a distribution of 100% of their allowed claims.

The Debtors shall fund distributions under the Plan with: (a) Cash
on hand, including Cash from operations, remaining Retained Cash
Proceeds, Excess Cash and Noteholder New Common Equity Investment
Cash (if any); (b) if applicable, the proceeds of the Exit
Revolving Credit Facility; (c) the New Equity Interests; (d) the
Noteholder Warrants; (e) the Equityholder Warrants; (f) the New GTT
Term Loans; (g) the I Squared Deferred Consideration and (h)
Subscription Rights in connection with the Noteholder New Common
Equity Investment. Cash payments to be made pursuant to the Plan
will be made by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, as
applicable.

The Reorganized Debtors will be entitled to transfer funds between
and among themselves as they determine to be necessary or
appropriate to enable the Reorganized Debtors to make the payments
and distributions required by the Plan. Except as set forth in the
Plan or in this Disclosure Statement, and to the extent consistent
with any applicable limitations set forth in any applicable post
Effective Date agreement (including the New GTT Financing
Documentation and New Corporate Governance Documents), any changes
in intercompany account balances resulting from such transfers will
be accounted for and settled in accordance with the Debtors'
historical intercompany account settlement practices and will not
violate the terms of the Plan.

From and after the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtors, subject
to any applicable limitations set forth in any post Effective Date
agreement (including the New GTT Financing Documentation and New
Corporate Governance Documents), shall have the right and authority
without further order of the Bankruptcy Court to raise additional
capital and obtain additional financing as the Boards of Directors
of the applicable Reorganized Debtors deem appropriate.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 31,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3bKpeO8 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Proposed Counsel to the Debtors:

     AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
     One Bryant Park
     New York, New York 10036
     Telephone: (212) 872-1000
     Facsimile: (212) 872-1002
     Ira S. Dizengoff
     Philip C. Dublin
     David H. Botter
     Naomi Moss

                   About GTT Communications

Headquartered in McLean, Virginia, GTT Communications, Inc. --
http://www.gtt.net/-- owns and operates a global Tier 1 internet
network and provides a comprehensive suite of cloud networking
services. GTT connects people across organizations, around the
world, and to every application in the cloud.

GTT Communications, Inc., and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 21-11880) on Oct. 31,
2021, to implement a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan.

GTT had total assets of $2.8 billion and total debt of $4.1 billion
as of June 30, 2201.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtors had
prepetition funded indebtedness totaling $2.015 billion.

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as counsel;
TRS Advisors as investment banker; and Alvarez & Marsal, LLC as
restructuring advisor. Prime Clerk, LLC, is the claims agent.


GULF COAST HEALTH: Law Firm of Russel Represent Utility Companies
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the Law Firm of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC submitted a verified
statement to disclose that it is representing the utility companies
provided notice that it is/they are representing these creditors in
the Chapter 11 cases of Gulf Coast Health Care, LLC.

The names and addresses of the Utilities represented by the Firm
are:

     a. Florida Power & Light Company
        Gulf Power Company
        Attn: Joseph Ianno, Esq.
        Law Department
        700 Universe Blvd.
        Juno Beach, FL 33408

     b. TECO Peoples Gas System
        Attn: Barbara Taulton FRP, CAP
        Florida Registered Paralegal
        Tampa Electric Company
        702 N. Franklin Street
        Tampa, FL 33602

The nature and the amount of claims of the Utilities, and the times
of acquisition thereof are as follows:

     a. The following Utilities may have unsecured claims against
certain Debtors arising from prepetition utility usage: Florida
Power & Light Company, Gulf Power Company and TECO Peoples Gas
System.

     b. Florida Power & Light Company and Gulf Power Company each
held prepetition deposits that wholly or partially secured
prepetition debt with certain Debtors.

     c. Florida Power & Light Company, Gulf Power Company and TECO
Peoples Gas System each hold one or more surety bonds that fully or
partially secures prepetition debt with certain Debtors.

     d. For more information regarding the claims and interests of
the Utilities in these jointly-administered cases, refer to the
Objection of Certain Utility Companies To the Motion of Debtors For
Entry of Interim and Final Orders (I) Approving Debtors' Proposed
Form of Adequate Assurance of Payment; (II) Establishing Procedures
For Resolving Objections By Utility Companies; and (III)
Prohibiting Utility Companies From Altering, Refusing, or
Discontinuing Service filed in the above-captioned,
jointly-administered, bankruptcy cases.

The Law Firm of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC was retained to
represent the foregoing Utilities in October 2021. The
circumstances and terms and conditions of employment of the Firm by
the Companies is protected by the attorney-client privilege and
attorney work product doctrine.

The Firm can be reached at:

          LAW FIRM OF RUSSELL R. JOHNSON III, PLC
          2258 Wheatlands Drive
          Manakin-Sabot, VA 23103
          Telephone: (804) 749-8861
          Facsimile: (804) 749-8862
          E-mail: russell@russelljohnsonlawfirm.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing is available at
https://bit.ly/3q8OJ45 at no extra charge.

                    About Gulf Coast Health Care

Gulf Coast Health Care is a licensed operator of 28 skilled nursing
facilities comprising nearly 3,350 licensed beds across Florida,
Georgia, and Mississippi.  It provides short-term rehabilitation,
comprehensive  post-acute skilled care, long-term care, assisted
living, and therapy services in each of their Facilities.

Gulf Coast Health Care, LLC, and 61 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-11336) on Oct. 14,
2021.  In the petition signed by Benjamin M. Jones as chief
restructuring officer, Gulf Coast Health Care estimated assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and estimated liabilities of
between $100 million to $500 million.

The cases are handled by Honorable Judge Karen B. Owens.

McDermott Will & Emery LLP is the Debtors' counsel, and Ankura
Consulting Group LLC is the financial advisor.  Epiq is the claims
agent.


GULF COAST: Asks Court to Transfer Control of 24 Nursing Homes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Gulf Coast Health Care filed a motion with the Delaware Bankruptcy
Court for permission to offload its operational obligations for 24
of its facilities to a third party to help the company's Chapter 11
case wind down.

In a motion seeking approval for adoption of a management and
operations transfer agreement for the 24 nursing homes leased from
Omega Healthcare Investors Inc. , Gulf Coast said the transfer
would allow it to relieve itself of operating costs and bring in a
new manager that would preserve patient care standards for its
2,200 residents.

The Debtors operate 28 skilled nursing facilities in the
Southeastern United States.  The Debtors do not own the underlying
real property at the Facilities, but rather lease the Facilities
from two primary landlords: (i) 24 facilities (the "Omega
Facilities") are leased from certain affiliates and subsidiaries of
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.; and (ii) four facilities (the
"Blue Mountain
Facilities") are leased from certain affiliates and subsidiaries of
Eagle Arc Partners LLC (f/k/a Blue Mountain Holdings).

Following negotiations with certain of the Debtors' key
stakeholders, including the Omega Landlords and the Debtors' senior
secured lender, New Ark Capital, LLC, the Debtors reached agreement
on a Restructuring Support Agreement (the "RSA"), by and among the
Debtors, OHI Asset Funding (DE), LLC (the "DIP Lender"), the Omega
Landlords (together with the DIP Lender, the "Omega Entities"), New
Ark, direct and indirect equity holders of the Debtors (the "Equity
Sponsors"), and certain affiliated entities that provide services
to the Debtors (the "Service Providers").  In the Debtors' view,
the restructuring transactions memorialized in the RSA represent
not only the best but the only available and viable option to an
effective restructuring, which can be implemented quickly to
minimize administrative costs and which will safeguard the health
and safety of the Debtors' residents.  At the same time, these
transactions also provide a means for a controlled and orderly
winddown of the Debtors' operations and a mechanism to provide
recoveries to unsecured creditors -- stakeholders that would not be
entitled to any recovery absent the agreements among the RSA
Parties set forth in the RSA.

Because of the substantial operating shortfalls at the Debtors'
Facilities and the
need to prioritize resident care, the Debtors must transition the
Omega Facilities as expeditiously as possible.  In order to
implement this transition quickly, in light of the various
regulatory waiting periods for licensure, the Debtors and the Omega
Landlords have identified NSPRMC II, LLC, to serve as an interim
manager (the "New Manager") under certain Management and Operations
Transfer Agreements (collectively, the "MOTA").  New Manager will
then either (i) elect to become
the new operator for some or all of the Omega Facilities or (ii)
select one or more new, licensed operators (collectively, "New
Operator") and subsequently assign the MOTA to New Operator on the
date that New Operator has obtained all requisite approval and
licenses to operate the applicable Facility (the "License Transfer
Date").  Under the MOTA, the operating expenses of the Omega
Facilities will no longer be borne by the Debtors as of December 1,
2021 (the anticipated "Management Transfer Date") but rather by New
Manager, which will allow the Debtors to focus their efforts on
reaching a similar resolution with the Blue
Mountain Landlords, and otherwise winding down their affairs
through the Plan.

The Debtors believe that the value of the Assets being transferred
under the MOTA is de minimis, due to the fact that substantially
all of the personal property utilized in the day-to-day operations
of the Omega Facilities does not actually belong to the Debtors.
The de minimus value pales in comparison to the value that the
Debtors' estates will receive through the RSA, the DIP Financing,
and the assumption of significant repayment obligations that the
Debtors currently owe under the Medicare Accelerated and Advance
Payment Program (i.e., the MAAP Liabilities, as discussed below),
which will become an obligation of New Operator following the
License Transfer Date.  The Debtors' only valuable assets --
accounts receivable generated prior to the Management Transfer Date
-- will be retained as excluded assets under the MOTA and will be
collected by the Debtors in the ordinary course of business.

                    About Gulf Coast Health Care

Gulf Coast Health Care is a licensed operator of 28 skilled nursing
facilities comprising nearly 3,350 licensed beds across Florida,
Georgia, and Mississippi. It provides short-term rehabilitation,
comprehensive post-acute skilled care, long-term care, assisted
living, and therapy services in each of their Facilities.

Gulf Coast Health Care, LLC, and 61 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-11336) on Oct. 14,
2021. In the petition signed by Benjamin M. Jones as chief
restructuring officer, Gulf Coast Health Care estimated assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and estimated liabilities of
between $100 million to $500 million.

The cases are handled by Honorable Judge Karen B. Owens.

McDermott Will & Emery LLP is the Debtors' counsel, and Ankura
Consulting Group LLC is the financial advisor. Epiq is the claims
agent.



GVS TEXAS: Reaches Deal to Duck Appointment of Ch.11 Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill of Bloomberg Law reports that GVS Texas Holdings I LLC,
a bankrupt self-storage operator, defeated the government's attempt
to name an independent trustee to oversee its Chapter 11 case,
after agreeing to keep its former CEO away from management.

The agreement -- struck among GVS Texas, its principal lenders, and
the former CEO Natin Paul -- will allow the Austin-based company to
maintain control of its bankruptcy case.

It also resolves the conflicts of interest and management problems
that spurred the U.S. Trustee's bid to appoint a trustee in the
case or convert it to Chapter 7, according to the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas.

                    About GVS Texas Holdings I

GVS Texas Holdings I, LLC and its affiliates are primarily engaged
in renting and leasing a wide array of properties functioning
principally as self-storage and parking facilities in 64 locations
in Texas, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri,
Nevada, New York, Ohio, and Tennessee.  Six of the properties are
in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, with an additional 28 located
elsewhere in the State of Texas.  The properties are managed by
Great Value Storage, LLC, that maintains and manages the
facilities.

GVS Texas Holdings I, LLC, et al. are directly or indirectly owned
by Natin Paul, as the principal shareholder of corporate parent GVS
Portfolio I C, LLC.  Great Value Storage LLC (the "Property
Manager") maintains, manages, and operates GVS Texas Holdings I,
LLC, et al.'s self-storage and parking facilities.  The Property
Manager, which is also owned by Paul, was placed into receivership
by a Texas state court on Sept. 8, 2021.  

GVS Texas Holdings I and several affiliates, including GVS
Portfolio I C, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Lead Case No. 21-31121) on June 17, 2021. In its petition, GVS
Texas Holdings I listed assets and liabilities of $100 million to
$500 million each.

The parent entity, GVS Portfolio I C, LLC, filed a voluntary
Chapter 11 petition June 23, 2021.

The petitions were signed by Robert D. Albergotti, authorized
party.

Great Value Storage, LLC, is a non-debtor operating affiliate.

Judge Michelle V. Larson oversees the case.

The Debtors tapped Thomas R. Califano, Esq., at Sidley Austin LLP,
as general bankruptcy counsel.


HARMAN PRESS: Has Deal on Cash Collateral Access Thru Jan 2022
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Harman Press, Inc. and the U.S. Small Business Administration
advised the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California, San Fernando Valley Division, that they have reached an
agreement regarding the Debtor's use of cash collateral and now
desire to memorialize the terms of this agreement into an agreed
order.

Pre-petition, on December 21, 2020, the Debtor executed a U.S.
Small Business Administration Note, pursuant to which the Debtor
obtained a loan in the amount of $150,000. The terms of the Note
require the Debtor to pay principal and interest payments of $731
every month beginning 12 months from the date of the Note over the
30 year term of the SBA Loan. The SBA Loan has an annual rate of
interest of 3.75% and may be prepaid at any time without notice of
penalty.  Pursuant to the SBA Loan Authorization and Agreement
executed on December 21, 2020, the Debtor is required to "use all
the proceeds of this Loan solely as working capital to alleviate
economic injury caused by disaster occurring in the month of
January 31, 2020 and continuing thereafter and to pay Uniform
Commercial Code Lien filing fees and a third-party UCC handling
charge of $100 which will be deducted from the Loan amount."

As evidenced by a Security Agreement executed on December 21, 2020
and a validly recorded UCC-1 filing on January 4, 2021as Filing
Number U210000125914, the SBA Loan is secured by all tangible and
intangible personal property.

The parties agree that any and all of the Personal Property
Collateral constitutes the cash collateral of the SBA. The SBA
consents to the Debtor's use of Cash Collateral. Other than the
Debtor's use of Cash Collateral, the Debtor represents to the SBA
that it will make no additional or unauthorized use of the Cash
Collateral retroactive from the SBA Loan date until entry of an
Order Confirming the Debtor's Plan of Reorganization or January 31,
2022, whichever occurs earlier, for ordinary and necessary
expenses.

As adequate protection, the SBA will receive a replacement lien to
the extent that the automatic stay, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. section
362, as well as use, sale, lease or grant results in a decrease in
the value of the SBA's interest in the Personal Property Collateral
on a post-petition basis. The replacement lien is valid, perfected
and enforceable and will not be subject to dispute, avoidance, or
subordination, and this replacement lien need not be subject to
additional recording.

The SBA is authorized to file a certified copy of the cash
collateral order and any other necessary and related documents to
further perfect its lien. Any diminution in the value of SBA's
collateral pursuant to the SBA Loan over the life of the proceeding
will entitle the SBA a super-priority claim. SBA's claim under the
SBA Loan will be allowed as a secured claim in the amount of
$150,000 plus all ongoing accrued interest.

These events constitute an "Event of Default:" (a) the failure to
maintain property insurance; (b) the conversion of the Debtor's
Bankruptcy Case to any other chapter; or (c) the dismissal of the
Debtor's bankruptcy case.  

A copy of the motion and the Debtor's budget for October 2021 to
March 2021 is available for free at https://bit.ly/3GSi8FD from
PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $1,110,000 in total revenue and $601,320 in
total operating expenses.

                    About The Harman Press Inc.

The Harman Press Inc. is a commercial printing shop in North
Hollywood, CA.  The Harman Press' clients include the entertainment
industry, healthcare industry, and national businesses.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 21-11544) on September
20, 2021. In the petition signed by Philip Goldner, president, the
Debtor disclosed $1,747,990 in assets and $1,973,146 in
liabilities.

Judge Maureen Tighe oversees the case.

Thomas B. Ure, Esq. at Ure Law Firm is the Debtor's counsel.



HEALTHCARE ROYALTY: Fitch Withdraws Ratings
-------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings will withdraw the ratings of Healthcare Royalty, Inc.
and its indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, HCRX Investments Holdco,
L.P. (together HRI) following the company's decision to cancel its
plans to raise new equity and debt capital.

Fitch currently rates HRI as follows:

Healthcare Royalty, Inc.

-- Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB'.

HCRX Investments Holdco L.P.

-- Long-Term IDR at 'BB';

-- Senior secured credit facilities at 'BBB-(EXP)'/'RR1';

-- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB(EXP)'/'RR4'.

Fitch is withdrawing the ratings of HRI as the company is
undergoing a reorganization. Accordingly, Fitch will no longer
provide ratings or analytical coverage for HRI. Prior to the
withdrawal, Fitch did not take any other rating actions given the
lack of information about the reorganization at this point.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Key Rating Drivers are not applicable because the ratings are being
withdrawn.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Rating sensitivities are not applicable as the ratings are being
withdrawn.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

ISSUER PROFILE

HRI is a leading mid-market royalty acquisition company. The
company's investment focus is on growth assets and emerging
companies seeking to drive innovation in the biopharmaceutical
industry.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

ESG Considerations are not applicable as the ratings are being
withdrawn.


HELIUS MEDICAL: Receives PoNS Market Authorization in Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
Helius Medical Technologies, Inc. has received market authorization
from the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for the
sale of PoNS as a Class IIa medical device.  The Company's
representative in Australia is working with the TGA to finalize the
exact scope of the authorization, which is expected to cover the
use of PoNS to improve balance and gait when used as an adjunct to
a therapeutic exercise program.

"We are thrilled that we will be able to introduce this
groundbreaking therapy for patients in Australia needing to improve
their balance and gait," said Dane C. Andreeff, president and chief
executive officer of Helius.  "This marks the third country in
which PoNS is authorized and further validates the effectiveness of
our innovative PoNS therapy.  We will begin evaluating the pathway
toward commercialization in Australia once the scope of the
authorization is finalized."

                       About Helius Medical

Helius Medical Technologies -- http://www.heliusmedical.com-- is a
neurotech company focused on neurological wellness.  Its purpose is
to develop, license or acquire non-invasive technologies targeted
at reducing symptoms of neurological disease or trauma.

Helius Medical reported a net loss of $14.13 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $9.78 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$10.72 million in total assets, $2.35 million in total liabilities,
and $8.37 million in total stockholders' equity.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-based BDO USA, LLP issued a "going
concern" qualification in its report dated March 10, 2021, citing
that the Company has incurred substantial net losses since its
inception, has an accumulated deficit of $118.9 million as of Dec.
31, 2020 and the Company expects to incur further net losses in the
development of its business.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


HOOT THE DOG: Wins Permission to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida has
authorized Hoot The Dog, LLC and Hoot The Dog Five, LLC to use cash
collateral until further Court order.  

The Debtors may use the cash collateral to pay their current and
necessary expenses, as set forth in the budgets, as well as the
amounts expressly authorized by the Court.

The Court said it is not making any determination as to the nature
of the relationship between the Debtors and any creditors,
including those that objected to the Motions to Use Cash Collateral
and appeared at the Hearing. Specifically, Fox Capital Group, Inc.,
Panthers Capital, LLC, BMF Advance, LLC and EBF Holdings, LLC all
assert that they purchased and certain receipts from the Debtors,
that such receipts are not property of the bankruptcy estate and
that, as a result, cannot be used as cash collateral by the
Debtors. Fox Capital, Panthers Capital, BMF Advance and EBF
Holdings reserve all rights with respect to the issue.

Each creditor with interest in the cash collateral shall have
perfected postpetition lien against the cash collateral to the same
extent and with the same validity and priority as each creditor's
prepetition lien.  

The Debtor will make monthly adequate protection payments beginning
on November 15, 2021, and on or before the 15th of every month
thereafter until the effective date of an order confirming a
chapter 11 plan or as otherwise ordered by the Court, as agreed
upon with creditors as follows:

                                       Monthly Adequate
     Name of Creditor                  Protection Payment
     ----------------                  ------------------
     East Harbor                           $13,145.52
     BMF Advance, LLC                       $7,782.59
     Panthers Capital, LLC                  $3,313.87
     Fox Capital Group                      $2,914.75
     Bridge Capital Ventures               $10,104.98
     EBF Holdings, LLC                      $2,738.29

Hoot The Dog, LLC's budget for the period from November 24 to
December 21, 2021, provided for $108,059 in total cost of sales,
and $292,684.22 in total controllable expenses.  Hoot The Dog Five,
LLC's budget for the same period provided for $33,805 in cost of
sales, and $87,278.22 in total controllable expenses.

A copy of the order is available for free at https://bit.ly/3c2pmJf
from PacerMonitor.com.

                      About Hoot The Dog, LLC

Hoot The Dog, LLC is part of the restaurants industry. The Debtor
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 21-04799) on September 20, 2021. In the
petition signed by Jay Thomas, managing member, the Debtor
disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $10 million in
liabilities.

Judge Caryl E. Delano oversees the case.

Jake C. Blanchard, Esq., at Blanchard Law, P.A. is the Debtor's
counsel.



HORIZON GLOBAL: Incurs $2.8 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Horizon Global Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $2.77 million on $196.54 million of net sales for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2021, compared to net income of $1.59
million on $201.63 million of net sales for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $16.96 million on $617.85 million of net sales compared
to a net loss of $32.16 million on $485.37 million of net sales for
the same period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $468.33 million in total
assets, $494.26 million in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $25.93 million.

"When we launched our turnaround plan in late 2019, we set out to
build a strong global organization that would not waver regardless
of the external business climate," stated Terry Gohl, Horizon
Global's president and chief executive officer.  "Our Q3 2021
performance is evidence that we achieved this objective.  Despite
significant and unprecedented macroeconomic headwinds relating to
material costs and supply chain constraints, we did not bend.
Instead, we rose to the occasion and rapidly identified and
deployed targeted actions, including commercial price recovery,
manufacturing rebalancing and operational cost mitigation, to
partially offset the impact of industry-wide headwinds.  At the
same time, we never lost sight of our long-term strategic plan and
accelerated the execution of operational improvement initiatives to
support the business in Q3 2021 and beyond."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001637655/000163765521000160/hzn-20210930.htm

                       About Horizon Global

Horizon Global -- http://www.horizonglobal.com-- is a designer,
manufacturer, and distributor of a wide variety of
custom-engineered towing, trailering, cargo management and other
related accessory products in North America, Australia and Europe.
The Company serves OEMs, retailers, dealer networks and the end
consumer.

Horizon Global reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$36.56 million for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to
net income attributable to the company of $80.75 million for the 12
months ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company had
$468.15 million in total assets, $492.41 million in total
liabilities, and a total shareholders' deficit of $24.26 million.


HOYA MIDCO: S&P Raises ICR to 'B', on Merger with Horizon
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
Hoya Midco LLC (doing business as [dba] Vivid Seats) to 'B' from
'B-' and removed all of its ratings from CreditWatch, where S&P
placed them with positive implications on April 23, 2021.

In addition, S&P raised its issue-level rating on the company's
senior secured term loan due 2024 to 'B' from 'B-' and revised its
recovery rating to '3' from '4'. S&P's '3' recovery rating
indicates its expectation for meaningful (50%-70%, rounded
estimate: 65%) recovery in the event of a default.

The upgrade reflects substantially reduced debt levels following
the completion of Vivid Seats' merger with Horizon Acquisition
Corp. Vivid Seats used substantially all of the proceeds from its
SPAC merger, approximately $770 million, to pay down term loans,
redeem the company's senior preferred equity, and pay related fees
and expenses, substantially reducing its debt. S&P said, "Pro forma
for the transaction, we expect Vivid Seats will have $458 million
outstanding on its senior secured term loan and approximately $450
million of cash on the balance sheet. The company's leverage as of
June 30, 2021, remains very high because the company generated
negative EBITDA over the past 12 months, but run-rate
leverage-based second quarter results were approximately 3.7x pro
forma for the SPAC transaction and debt paydown. We expect the
company's leverage to be approximately 5.5x-6x by year-end 2021 and
for the company to reduce leverage toward the 5x area in 2022.
While the company does not currently have any liabilities relating
to its tax receivable agreement with its sponsor and we have not
currently incorporated a liability in our measure of adjusted debt
through 2023, we expect any potential liability could slow
deleveraging for the company."

S&P said, "We expect a recovery in ticketing volumes, driven by
pent-up demand for live entertainment, will help the Vivid Seats
increase its revenue and earnings.Vivid Seats' ticketing volume has
begun to recover as the global vaccination effort progresses and
restrictions on live events are mostly lifted and as consumers
begin to feel more comfortable in traditional venues for
entertainment. We estimate that the company's marketplace gross
order value (GOV) in the second quarter was meaningfully higher
than the comparable quarter in 2019 as Vivid Seats benefitted from
significant pent-up demand for concerts, sporting events, and
theater shows. We expect demand for live entertainment will
continue to support elevated GOV and net revenue over the next
several months and that volumes will remain modestly above
prepandemic levels throughout the end of the year despite lingering
consumer apprehensions regarding large gatherings. We expect Vivid
Seats' GOV and net revenue will remain approximately 10%-15% above
prepandemic levels through the end of 2021.

"Absent a return of pandemic-related restrictions on large
gatherings, we expect that ticket sales associated with sporting
events and theater shows will return to just under prepandemic
levels in 2022 as restrictions continue to ease and major sports
leagues and theater productions that were disrupted throughout 2020
return to normal schedules. However, we expect ticket volumes
associated with concerts to be 5%-10% above prepandemic levels. Our
understanding is that a good portion of concerts since the start of
the pandemic either remain postponed or have been rescheduled to
future dates. As a result, Vivid Seats will benefit from an
outsized number of shows booked in the latter half of this year and
in 2022 that will support higher marketplace GOV. In addition, we
believe that average order size will remain elevated through 2022,
supported by pent-up demand and excess savings.

"The positive outlook reflects the potential for an upgrade if
Vivid Seats is able to maintain solid operating performance,
increase revenue above 2019 levels in 2022, and reduce adjusted
gross leverage below 5x in 2022 (including any potential tax
receivable agreement related liabilities) while maintaining FOCF to
debt in the high-single-digit area.

"We could raise our rating on Vivid Seats if we came to believe
that Vivid Seats would be able to sustain S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA comfortably below our 5x upgrade
threshold and maintain FOCF to debt in the mid-to-high single-digit
area. To raise the rating, we would also need to gain more clarity
on the company's financial policy, ownership profile, and
incremental leverage from its tax receivable liability.

"We could revise our outlook to stable if we expected leverage to
remain in the 5x-6x range for a prolonged period due to a
combination of a slower ramp-up in revenue and EBITDA growth in
2022 or significant tax receivable liabilities that caused an
increase in the company's leverage. A downgrade is unlikely over
the next 12 months and would result from a combination of operating
challenges stemming from virus variants causing further government
restrictions or shutdowns and an aggressive financial policy such
that the company used its cash and placed incremental debt to fund
high-priced acquisitions that caused leverage to remain above 6x
for a prolonged period."



HRNI HOLDINGS: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'B(EXP)' LongTerm IDR
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned HRNI Holdings, LLC (HRNI, fka Spectacle
Gary Holdings, LLC) an expected Long-Term Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) of 'B(EXP)'. Fitch has also assigned an expected 'B+(EXP)/RR3
rating to HRNI's announced $415 million senior secured term loan B.
The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The final IDR and instrument ratings are contingent on completion
of HRNI's recapitalization and receipt of final documents
conforming materially to preliminary documentation reviewed.

HRNI's IDR reflects its 'b-' Standalone Credit Profile (SCP) with a
one-notch uplift related to its relationship with Seminole Hard
Rock Entertainment, Inc. (BBB-/Stable) and Seminole Hard Rock
International, LLC (BBB-/Stable); collectively SHRE. HRNI's SCP
reflects its single-site nature and conservative gross leverage.
However, Fitch expects gross leverage to increase in the
medium-term to around 5.0x-5.5x due to multiple competitive
openings in the Chicagoland market. The rating considers Fitch's
expected cannibalization to HRNI's cash flow.

The one-notch uplift to the IDR from HRNI's SCP is pursuant to
Fitch's Exposure Draft: Parent and Subsidiary Linkage Rating
Criteria and reflects the entity's linkage to SHRE, which Fitch
considers to be a stronger parent. SHRE indirectly owns 76% of
HRNI.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Moderate Leverage to Increase: Fitch calculates pro forma gross
leverage (total debt/EBITDA) of 4.4x, which should decline towards
4.0x by 2022. This is strong in the context of the SCP, but will
increase in the medium-term due to cannibalization from competitive
openings in the Chicagoland market. Fitch expects strong FCF for
HRNI's single-site property in the near-term due to good EBITDA
generation, manageable interest expense, and minimal required
maintenance capex,. This should help near-term delevering.

Competitive Pressure: HRNI will be subject to multiple new
competitive properties, including a casino in Chicago's south
suburban area estimated by 2024 and in downtown Chicago estimated
by 2026. The state is considering proposals for both sites, with
multiple well-capitalized operators vying for the licenses. The
additional supply will affect existing properties in Chicagoland,
including HRNI, given the close proximity to Gary, Indiana. Fitch
expects the south suburban and downtown licenses to negatively
impact HRNI's cash flow and leverage, although this should be
manageable.

Fitch forecasts a high-teen percentage revenue decline in 2024
following the opening of the south suburban casino, regardless of
which proposal is selected for the license. Fitch's base case does
not forecast this casino to meaningfully expand the total
addressable gaming market due to Chicagoland's existing casinos and
video lottery terminals. Pro forma leverage is likely to exceed
5.0x, assuming a roughly 50% flow-through to EBITDA, which is more
consistent with a 'b-' SCP for the standalone property.

Longer-Term Risk from Downtown License: Fitch looks through this
competitive opening to evaluate the long-term credit risk for HRNI,
due to the likely impact it will have on the marketplace and on
HRNI's metrics. Similarly to the south suburban license, Fitch's
base case does not contemplate meaningful growth to the overall
addressable market and assumes significant cannibalization from all
Chicagoland casinos. Fitch forecasts HRNI's leverage to remain in
the 5.0x-5.5x range, assuming a 10%-15% revenue cannibalization for
HRNI and similar flowthrough as the south suburban competitive
opening.

Lack of Diversification: HRNI operates a single property in a
competitive market that is subject to new supply risk, limiting
rating upside as future cash flow generation will be challenged.
Most single-site operators are rated in the single 'B' category
unless there are unique end-market dynamics. These include
monopolistic positions, being a clear market leader, or having a
conservative balance sheet. HRNI's geographic concentration offsets
decent pro forma leverage and credit metrics.

Good Initial Performance: The property opened in May 2021 and has
taken incremental market share away from nearby competitors in
addition to the legacy Majestic Star share. HRNI has mid-teen
percentage market share in Indiana and a similar share in the
broader Chicagoland market. Hard Rock is the newest property
opening in nearly a decade and has benefited from its proximity to
the highway, brand recognition, and favorable regional gaming
trends. Current win-per-day metrics are trending above area
averages, at over $400 and $3,000 for slots and tables,
respectively.

Solid Chicagoland Performance: Regional gaming performance has been
strong in 2021, with most markets recovering to 2019 revenue
levels. This is largely due to pent-up demand, a lack of reliance
on fly-in visitation, and strong consumer discretionary spend.
Regional gaming has been a bright spot in overall leisure and
entertainment spend, and Fitch forecasts growth over 2019 levels
through to 2022. The Chicagoland area has also performed well, with
annualized revenue slightly above full-year 2019, trending towards
$2.0 billion in GGR for the entire market.

SHRE Relationship Positive: Fitch believes HRNI's association with
SHRE warrants a one-notch uplift from HRNI's SCP due to management
and brand overlap. Fitch considers SHRE as a stronger parent based
on its underlying SCP, which is consistent with 'b'. SHRE's 'BBB'-
IDR is attributed to the guarantee of its debt by Seminole Tribe of
Florida (STOF, BBB/Stable). However, Fitch believes SHRE has weak
legal and strategic incentives to support HRNI, as there is no
downstream guarantee and HRNI make a low financial contribution
relative to SHRE's broader complex.

Our assessment of moderate operational incentives recognizes that
HRNI shares common executive management with SHRE, is part of
SHRE's broader 'Unity' player rewards program, and that its
property is part of SHRE's regional gaming expansion aspirations.
SHRE owns 76% of HRNI and controls a majority of its board of
directors. SHRE has also supported the entity through equity
injections in 2021 when it took majority control following the
prior majority owner's (Spectacle Entertainment Group) licensing
issues with state regulators.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

HRNI's SCP is consistent with most other single-site gaming
operators, including Empire Resorts Inc. (B+(EXP)/Stable, SCP: b-)
and Enterprise Development Authority (EDA, B+/Negative). HRNI has
similar end-market dynamics as the two peers, including competitive
operating environments with new supply risk, single-site
properties, and similar cash flow generation. HRNI's leverage and
profitability is weaker than its similar Hard Rock branded peer in
Sacramento, EDA, especially given the pending casino openings in
Chicagoland through 2026.

HRNI is considered weaker than its larger, more geographically
diversified regional gaming peers, including Bally's Corporation
(B+/Stable), Great Canadian Gaming Corporation (B+/Stable), and MGM
Resorts International (BB-/Rating Watch Negative). These peers have
similar-to-slightly higher leverage profiles, but much stronger FCF
generation and are well diversified.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Slot and table win-per-day remaining stable through 2022,
    slightly above the Chicagoland average. GGR to rise by low
    single digits in 2022 and 2023, supported by solid initial
    performance and Chicagoland already experiencing a full
    recovery above pre-pandemic levels.

-- A competitive south suburban Chicago casino opens in 2024,
    negatively impacting HRNI. Fitch expects 19% cannibalization
    to revenue with a roughly 50% flowthrough to EBITDA.

-- A second competitive casino opens in 2026 in downtown Chicago.
    Fitch expects an additional 15% decline in gaming revenue, and
    a similar flowthrough.

-- EBITDA margin to decline over the long-term from the strong
    initial performance due to competitive openings, expiration of
    tax holidays, and increasing management fees.

-- Deleveraging ahead of the competitive openings to be driven
    through amortization (5% a year) and some degree of voluntary
    debt paydown (potentially through an excess cash flow sweep),
    but Fitch expects leverage to rise from 2024 due to
    cannibalization.

-- Capex limited to maintenance beyond 2021.

-- No shareholder distributions or acquisitions.

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

The recovery analysis assumes HRNI would be reorganized as a
going-concern in bankruptcy rather than liquidated. Fitch has
assumed a 10% administrative claim and full draw on the $35 million
revolver.

Going-concern EBITDA of $55 million reflects a sustainable level of
operating performance following a restructuring scenario stemming
from severe competitive pressures due to new competitive openings.
Though Fitch already expects some level of cannibalization in its
base case, Fitch's recovery scenario envisions a greater degree of
cannibalization and outsized impact to gaming metric performance.

Going-concern EBITDA assumes a level of win-per-unit-per-day of
slots and tables of $300 and $2,000, respectively, which is well
below the current average in the Chicagoland market and below where
the casino is trending; about $430 and $3,000. Fitch expects
non-gaming revenues to remain around 10% of total property
revenue.

Fitch applies a 6.0x enterprise value/EBITDA multiple, which
reflects the competitiveness of the Chicagoland market and new
supply risk, and the property's limited operating record. It also
reflects the single-site limitations of the credit. The 6.0x
multiple is in line with comparable regional gaming peers. The
quality of the property and healthy initial performance help to
offset these concerns.

Fitch forecasts a post-reorganization enterprise value of roughly
$330 million.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Greater degree of confidence that gross debt/EBITDA will
    remain below 5.0x and the FCF margin will exceed 10% amid the
    competitive pressures in the greater Chicago area;

-- An increase in rating linkage with SHRE;

-- Geographic diversification away from the Chicagoland market.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Gross debt/EBITDA sustaining above 7.0x;

-- FCF approaching breakeven;

-- Decrease rating linkage with SHRE or weakening of SHRE's SCP.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Pro forma for the recapitalization, liquidity will be adequate
between operational cash and $25 million in availability on its $35
million revolver. Cash flow generation is sufficient to cover debt
service and a small amount of maintenance capex annually. Fitch
expects FCF margins to be in the mid-teen range in 2022 and 2023,
prior to the competitive openings, and to fall to a single-digit
percent longer term.

HRNI is in the process of refinancing its existing debt with a new
secured capital structure, in the form of a $35 million super
senior secured revolver due 2026 ($10 million drawn at close) and a
$415 million senior secured term loan B due 2028. Spectacle Gary
Holdings, LLC will change its name to HRNI Holdings, LLC at
transaction close.

ISSUER PROFILE

HRNI is the owner and operator of Hard Rock Casino Northern
Indiana. SHRE indirectly owns 76% of HRNI and is, in turn, fully
owned by STOF.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


HUDSON PACIFIC: S&P Assigns 'BB' Rating on New Preferred Stock
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating to Hudson
Pacific Properties Inc.'s (HPP's) proposed preferred stock. The
company intends to use the net proceeds from this issuance to repay
the outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility,
which stood at $300 million as of Sept. 30, 2021. The preferred
stock will rank pari passu with all of HPP's future preferred share
issuances.

S&P said, "As is the standard for our ratings on the preferred
stock issued by investment-grade issuers, we rate the company's
preferred stock two notches below our issuer credit rating to
reflect the securities' subordination risk and the risk of a
partial or untimely payment. Although we treat this preferred stock
offering akin to debt in our leverage calculations, we view this
issuance as leverage neutral because management intends to use the
proceeds to refinance outstanding debt.

"We believe that HPP's high quality portfolio will support a
favorable operating performance, with increasing net operating
income (NOI) supported by positive rent spreads despite some modest
occupancy pressure. Under our base-case forecast, we assume the
company's S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA trends back to
the mid- to high-7x area, upon the accretion of a full year of
EBITDA from its recent acquisitions, and remains in that range over
the following couple of years."

As of Sept. 30, 2020, HPP's operating performance was in line with
our expectations. The company's same-property cash NOI was up 12.8%
for the quarter and 6.7% year-to-date. At the same time, its
same-property office occupancy declined slightly to 90.4% while its
rent spreads rose by 5.1% during the quarter.



INFINERA CORP: Incurs $53.8 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Infinera Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $53.79 million on $355.81 million of total revenue for the three
months ended Sept. 25, 2021, compared to a net loss of $35.90
million on $340.21 million of total revenue for the three months
ended Sept. 26, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 25, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $137.71 million on $1.02 billion of total revenue
compared to a net loss of $196.80 million on $1 billion of total
revenue for the nine months ended Sept. 26, 2020.

As of Sept. 25, 2021, the Company had $1.53 billion in total
assets, $520.19 million in total current liabilities, $468.84
million in long-term debt, $20.94 million in long-term accrued
warranty, $30.05 million in long-term deferred revenue, $3.13
million in long-term deferred tax liability, $65.29 million in
long-term operating lease liabilities, $84.76 million in other
long-term liabilities, and $340.27 million in total stockholders'
equity.

Infinera CEO David Heard said, "Q3 was a strong quarter for us,
with revenue coming in ahead of the mid-point of our outlook range
and both non-GAAP gross margin and operating margin exceeding the
high-end of our outlook range.  We delivered these results against
a challenging supply chain environment and ended the quarter with
record backlog."

"The demand drivers fueling our business are robust and we remain
focused on executing our strategy with an enhanced leadership team.
Having refreshed our portfolio, we are ramping our ICE6 products
and achieving greater market traction.  Based on this foundation, I
remain confident in our ability to deliver on our financial goals
for 2021 and our longer-term target business model."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1138639/000113863921000199/infn-20210925.htm

                       About Infinera Corp.

Headquartered in Sunnyvale, Calif., Infinera Corp. --
www.infinera.com -- is a global supplier of innovative networking
solutions that enable carriers, cloud operators, governments, and
enterprises to scale network bandwidth, accelerate service
innovation, and automate network operations.  The Infinera
end-to-end packet-optical portfolio delivers industry-leading
economics and performance in long-haul, submarine, data center
interconnect, and metro transport applications.

Infinera reported a net loss of $206.72 million for the year ended
Dec. 26, 2020, compared to a net loss of $386.62 million for the
year ended Dec. 28, 2019.  As of March 27, 2021, the Company had
$1.57 billion in total assets, $505.93 million in total current
liabilities, $453.43 million in long-term debt, $1.96 million in
long-term financing obligations, $19.94 million in long-term
accrued warranty, $28.96 million in long-term deferred revenue,
$3.68 million in long-term deferred tax liability, $72.91 million
in long-term operating lease liabilities, $86.79 million in other
long-term liabilities, and $393.35 million in total stockholders'
equity.


ION GEOPHYSICAL: Posts $440K Net Loss in Third Quarter
------------------------------------------------------
Ion Geophysical Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $440,000 on $44.39 million of total net revenues for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2021, compared to a net loss of $16.41
million on $16.23 million of total net revenues for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $31.22 million on $78.14 million of total net revenues
compared to a net loss of $23.92 million on $95.38 million of total
net revenues for the same period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $190.91 million in total
assets, $256.07 million in total liabilities, and a total deficit
of $65.17 million.

"Our third quarter results improved considerably, largely due to
the successful execution of our 3D strategy," said Chris Usher,
ION's president and CEO.  "Even in a challenging environment, our
multi-client market share increased by approximately 50% primarily
by launching new 3D programs.  Through exposure to larger scale 3D
earnings potential, we delivered a 125% sequential increase in
revenue and $22 million of Adjusted EBITDA.  Our team successfully
completed the second, much larger phase of Mid North Sea High and
launched a third extension that is expected to conclude
mid-November.  In addition, we experienced strong sales of our
newly reimaged 3D Picanha data offshore Brazil.

"In Operations Optimization, revenues continued improving during
the third quarter.  Our diversification strategy into ports and
offshore logistics is gaining momentum with an increasing pipeline.
We submitted our first multi-million-dollar country-scale
digitalization proposals for the climate-smart digital
infrastructure we are promoting with US government support for
maritime detection, port management and illegal fishing.  Regarding
platform development, two new valuable, client-driven Marlin
SmartPort modules were launched that drive automation and
efficiency and we received a grant to advance port
decarbonization.

"We continue diligent efforts to strengthen our financial position
and right size the business.  Our strategic alternatives process
with Tudor Pickering, Holt & Co. is ongoing as we evaluate all
options to improve liquidity and address our balance sheet.  Our
team has made great progress towards the approximately $16 million
of annualized savings identified, executing nearly $9 million in
short-term savings while progressing the remaining longer-term
initiatives.  Although some savings will be realized in the fourth
quarter, we expect the majority of the short-term savings will take
effect starting in early 2022."

"While the seismic market recovery remains uncertain, we expect
momentum to continue into the fourth quarter due to conversion of
existing backlog and a robust sales pipeline.  In addition, demand
for our offshore data and digitalization technologies is growing,
empowering clients to operate more efficiently and sustainably. Our
team continues to improve efficiency while focusing on strategic
initiatives that have the potential to transform the business, and
we're seeing significant traction and customer validation in both
the 3D new acquisition multi-client opportunities and large-scale
maritime digitalization solutions."

At quarter close, the Company's total liquidity of $35.0 million
consisted of $24.1 million of cash (including net revolver
borrowings of $19.4 million) and $10.9 million of remaining
available borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility,
an increase compared to $32.8 million as of June 30, 2021.  Whilst
the strategic alternatives process continues, and total liquidity
improved, the combination of weak first half revenues along with
the near-term debt and other obligations has not ameliorated the
going concern disclosed last quarter.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/866609/000143774921025105/io20210930_10q.htm

                             About ION

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, ION -- http://www.iongeo.com-- is
an innovative, asset light global technology company that delivers
powerful data-driven decision-making offerings to offshore energy,
ports and defense industries.  The Company is entering a fourth
industrial revolution where technology is fundamentally changing
how decisions are made.  The Company provides its services and
products through two business segments -- E&P Technology & Services
and Operations Optimization.

ION Geophysical reported a net loss of $37.11 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $47.21 million on
$174.68 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of June 30,
2021, the Company had $179.26 million in total assets, $243.99
million in total liabilities, and a total deficit of $64.73
million.

Houston, Texas-based Grant Thornton LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Feb. 11, 2021, citing that as of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company
had outstanding $120.6 million aggregate principal amount of its
9.125% Senior Secured Second Priority Notes, which mature on Dec.
15, 2021.  The Notes, classified as current liabilities, caused the
Company's current liabilities to exceed its current assets by
$150.9 million and its total liabilities exceeds its total assets
by $71.1 million.  These conditions, along with other matters,
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.

                            *   *    *

As reported by the TCR on June 7, 2021, S&P Global Ratings raised
its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based marine seismic data company
ION Geophysical Corp. to 'CCC' from 'SD' (selective default).  S&P
said, "Our 'CCC' rating reflects the company's unsustainable
leverage and the potential for a liquidity shortfall over the next
12 months.  After a 30% year-over-year decline in its revenue in
2020 and a 49% sequential decline in the first quarter of 2021, ION
is highly dependent on an improvement in demand for offshore
seismic data to survive."


J.S. CATES: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Jan 2022
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota has
approved the stipulation between by J.S. Cates Construction, Inc.
and its lender, CorTrust Bank, N.A., authorizing the Debtor to use
of cash collateral in accordance with the budget, through January
31, 2022.

The Debtor is authorized to continue to perform and be bound by the
Stipulation as extended thereby. The Debtor is authorized to
continue perform its obligations in accordance with the terms of
the Stipulation. The Stipulation will continue to be obligations of
the Debtor and its estate upon entry of the Cash Collateral Order
through the duration of its authorization.

As adequate protection for any use or diminution in the value of
CorTrust's interests in the Prepetition Collateral, and the
Debtor's use of Cash Collateral, the Debtor is authorized to grant
to CorTrust effective as of the Petition Date, valid and perfected
replacement liens and security interests on all post-petition
assets of the Debtor -- excluding causes of action arising under
Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code and the Debtor's 2020 Ford
Super-Duty F-350 -- and all products and proceeds thereof.  The
replacement liens will be to the same extent, dignity, and priority
as CorTrust held in its prepetition collateral and only to the
extent of any actual diminution in value of CorTrust's interest in
pre-petition collateral.

As additional adequate protection, the Debtor is authorized to
grant to CorTrust effective as of the Petition Date, a replacement
lien on the Debtor's real property in secondary position to the
CorTrust's mortgage to the extent of the diminution in value of
CorTrust's interest in prepetition collateral not otherwise
protected by replacement liens granted in the Adequate Protection
Collateral.

As additional adequate protection, the Debtor is authorized and
agrees to make monthly cash payments to CorTrust in the amount of
$3,000.

The replacement security interests of CorTrust granted pursuant to
the terms of the Stipulation will not have priority over valid,
perfected, enforceable and non-avoidable security interests.

The Court says all terms and requirements of the Stipulation and
the Final Order Authorizing Use of Cash Collateral and Granting
Adequate Protection Through August 20, 2021, filed as ECF No. 37,
remain in full force and effect and continue to apply to the
Debtor's use of cash collateral during the Extension Period.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/31zEUSG from
PacerMonitor.com.

                   About J.S. Cates Construction

J.S. Cates Construction, Inc., f/d/b/a J.S. Cates Companies, filed
a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 21-40881) on May
17, 2021 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Minnesota.  In the petition signed by Jeffrey S. Cates, president
and CEO, the Debtor disclosed $1,153,474 in total assets and
$1,767,454 in estimated liabilities.  

Judge Kathleen H. Sanberg is assigned to the case.  

Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd is the Debtor's counsel.  



JOHNSON & JOHNSON: Seeks to Revive Strategy to Resolve Powder Suits
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Church of Bloomberg News reports that Johnson & Johnson is
seeking to revive its strategy for resolving tens of thousands of
lawsuits alleging its baby powder caused ovarian cancer and other
health problems in women.

The company ended a two-day trial in Charlotte, North Carolina, on
Friday, November 5, 2021, to decide whether to temporarily halt
38,000 lawsuits aimed at J&J and about 250 retailers and insurance
companies.  The judge said he would announce his ruling next week
when J&J's bankrupt unit returns to court.

Stopping the suits is a key part of J&J's strategy to pay at least
$2 billion to end all current and future baby poweder claims.

"The prosecution of the Debtor Talc Claims against the Protected
Parties, including J&J, is automatically stayed because it would
liquidate indemnification claims against the Debtor outside of
chapter 11, effectively seek to collect on claims against the
Debtor, deplete available insurance coverage and eliminate the
protections of the automatic stay.  The objectors do not challenge
that actions against non-debtors are automatically stayed if the
"unusual circumstances" identified in Robins are present; they
instead rely on cases that simply found that in those situations
the unusual circumstances did not exist.  Because the Debtor is the
real party in interest with respect to all the types of new claims
described by the objectors, the automatic stay is applicable here,"
LTL Management said in a Nov. 3 court filing.

                    About Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is an American multinational corporation
founded in 1886 that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and
consumer packaged goods. J&J is the world's largest and most
broadly based healthcare company.

Johnson & Johnson is headquartered in New Brunswick, New Jersey,
the consumer division being located in Skillman, New Jersey. The
corporation includes some 250 subsidiary companies with operations
in 60 countries and products sold in over 175 countries.

Johnson & Johnson had worldwide sales of $82.6 billion during
calendar year 2020.

                     About LTL Management

LTL Management LLC is a newly formed subsidiary of Johnson &
Johnson. LTL was formed to manage and defend thousands of
talc-related claims and to oversee the operations of its
subsidiary, Royalty A&M. Royalty A&M owns a portfolio of royalty
revenue streams, including royalty revenue streams based on
third-party sales of LACTAID, MYLANTA /MYLICON and ROGAINE
products.

LTL Management LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.N.C.
Case No. 21-30589) on Oct. 14, 2021. The Hon. J. Craig Whitley is
the case judge.

The Debtor tapped JONES DAY as counsel, RAYBURN COOPER & DURHAM,
P.A., as co-counsel; BATES WHITE, LLC, as financial consultant; and
ALIXPARTNERS, LLP, as restructuring advisor. KING & SPALDING LLP
and SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P., serve as special counsel, and
McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP is the litigation consultant. EPIQ
CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC, is the claims agent.

The Debtor was estimated to have $1 billion to $10 billion in
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.


JONES SODA: Board OKs Chastain as Beverage Division President, COO
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jones Soda's Board of Directors ratified the appointment of Eric
Chastain, the Company's chief operating officer, as the president
and chief operating officer of the Company's beverage division, to
be effective as of Nov. 8, 2021.  In connection with such
appointment, Mr. Chastain's annual base salary will be increased
from $165,000 to $200,000.

In addition, on Nov. 2, 2021, the Board approved a cash bonus in
the amount of $15,000 payable to Joe Culp, the Company's
controller, principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer.
  
                          About Jones Soda

Headquartered in Seattle, WA, Jones Soda Co. -- www.jonessoda.com
-- develops, produces, markets and distributes premium beverages
primarily in the United States and Canada through its network of
independent distributors and directly to its national and regional
retail accounts.  The Company also sells products in select
international markets.  The Company's products are sold in grocery
stores, convenience and gas stores, on fountain in restaurants, "up
and down the street" in independent accounts such as delicatessens,
sandwich shops and burger restaurants, as well as through its
national accounts with several large retailers.

Jones Soda reported a net loss of $3 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.78 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $8.21
million in total assets, $3.72 million in total liabilities, and
$4.49 million in total shareholders' equity.

Seattle, Washington-based BDO USA, LLP, the Company's auditor since
2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
March 24, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has negative cash flows from operating
activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


JONES SODA: Incurs $59K Net Loss in Third Quarter
-------------------------------------------------
Jones Soda Co. reported a net loss of $59,000 on $4.57 million of
revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2021, compared to a
net loss of $450,000 on $3.54 million of revenue for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $469,000 on $11.88 million of revenue compared to a net
loss of $2.08 million on $9.43 million of revenue for the same
period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $11.05 million in total
assets, $5.14 million in total liabilities, and $5.91 million in
total stockholders' equity.

At Sept. 30, 2021, cash and cash equivalents totaled $5.9 million
compared to $3.1 million at June 30, 2021, and $4.6 million at
December 31, 2020.  Apart from the outstanding convertible debt
instruments, the Company did not have any substantial debt and
continues to actively evaluate a new line of credit.

Management Commentary

"We had another strong quarter as we experienced revenue growth
across all channels and continued momentum in our core bottled soda
business," said Mark Murray, president and CEO of Jones Soda.
"National awareness of Jones continued to grow during the quarter
as our marketing initiatives garnered significant interest from
both consumers and the media.  First, our augmented reality (AR)
label series we launched this summer has been a great success.  As
a follow up, we just rolled out a new series that features Zoltar,
the widely recognized fortune teller character.  Second, the highly
anticipated return of Turkey & Gravy as a Special Release flavor
has generated a lot of buzz among fans and media across the U.S.
and Canada.  Unique labels and flavors remain a signature point of
differentiation, and we continue to look for new and innovative
ways to engage with consumers.

"As recently announced, we took a significant step towards
launching our planned cannabis business line by signing a
definitive arrangement agreement with Pinestar.  We are excited
about our plans to launch a portfolio that will include not only
cannabis-infused beverages, but also edibles, vapes and pre-rolls.
We continue to believe that we are well-positioned as a nationally
recognized brand to capitalize on the opportunities in this space
and we are happy to have our first-ever Chief Marketing Officer,
Bohb Blair, being a steward of the launch.  We expect to launch our
portfolio in the first quarter of 2022, and we look forward to
sharing more details upon the close of the deal.

"Looking ahead, we believe we are well-positioned to continue
executing against our turnaround plan with momentum for the Jones
brand building across the U.S. and Canada.  While we remain
confident in our growth trajectory, we are not immune to the
supply-chain and commodity headwinds that businesses around the
world are facing.  Our team continues to work closely with our
supply-chain and raw materials partners in an effort to manage
these challenges and meet customer demand.  By taking these
actions, we expect to report strong results for the last quarter of
2021 and exceed our internal objectives for the year."

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001083522/000117184321007563/exh_991.htm

                        About Jones Soda

Headquartered in Seattle, WA, Jones Soda Co. -- www.jonessoda.com
-- develops, produces, markets and distributes premium beverages
primarily in the United States and Canada through its network of
independent distributors and directly to its national and regional
retail accounts.  The Company also sells products in select
international markets.  The Company's products are sold in grocery
stores, convenience and gas stores, on fountain in restaurants, "up
and down the street" in independent accounts such as delicatessens,
sandwich shops and burger restaurants, as well as through its
national accounts with several large retailers.

Jones Soda reported a net loss of $3 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.78 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $8.21
million in total assets, $3.72 million in total liabilities, and
$4.49 million in total shareholders' equity.

Seattle, Washington-based BDO USA, LLP, the Company's auditor since
2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
March 24, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has negative cash flows from operating
activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


KADMON HOLDINGS: Stockholders Approve Merger Deal With Sanofi Unit
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kadmon Holdings, Inc. held a special meeting of its stockholders on
Nov. 5, 2021, at which the stockholders:

    (1) approved the merger of the company with and into a wholly
owned indirect subsidiary of Sanofi, a societe anonyme ("Parent"),
pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of Sept. 7,
2021, by and among company, Sanofi and Latour Merger Sub, Inc., a
Delaware corporation and indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
Sanofi; and

    (2) approved the adjournment of the special meeting, if
necessary and for a minimum period of time reasonable under the
circumstances, to ensure that any necessary supplement or amendment
to the proxy statement is provided to Kadmon stockholders a
reasonable amount of time in advance of the special meeting or to
solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes at the
time of the special meeting to approve Proposal 1.

Kadmon expects to consummate the merger on Nov. 9, 2021.

                       About Kadmon Holdings

Based in New York, Kadmon Holdings, Inc. -- http://www.kadmon.com
-- is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company that discovers,
develops and delivers transformative therapies for unmet medical
needs.  The Company's clinical pipeline includes treatments for
immune and fibrotic diseases as well as immuno-oncology therapies.


Kadmon reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$111.03 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $63.43 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had
$304.26 million in total assets, $290.25 million in total
liabilities, and $14.01 million in total stockholders' equity.


KOPIN CORPORATION: Incurs $2.1 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kopin Corporation reported a net loss of $2.13 million on $10.88
million of revenues for the three months ended Sept. 25, 2021,
compared to a net loss of $968,769 on $9.51 million of revenues for
the three months ended Sept. 26, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 25, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $10.16 million on $32.47 million of revenues compared
to a net loss of $5.77 million on $26.21 million of revenues for
the nine months ended Sept. 26, 2020.

As of Sept. 25, 2021, the Company had $58.95 million in total
assets, $13.70 million in total current liabilities, $1.57 million
in other long term liabilities, $812,351 in operating lease
liabilities, and $42.86 million in total stockholders' equity.

Management Commentary

"We had strong third quarter results, with revenues increasing 14%
year over year, reflecting growing demand across our key markets,
including defense, industrial and consumer," said Dr. John C.C.
Fan, CEO of Kopin.  "This quarter was our 9th straight quarter of
year-on-year growth.  Revenues were again driven largely by our
defense production programs and our customer-funded development
programs.  In particular, our third quarter customer-funded R&D
revenue increased approximately 60% year over year, primarily
driven by accelerating interest in our next generation of displays
and our design and manufacturing expertise in rugged
'higher-level-assemblies' which are sub-systems that include our
displays, optics, electronics and ruggedized housings."

"On our second quarter results of operations call on August 3,
2021, we announced that we reduced shipments of our product for the
FWS-I thermal weapon sight program while we worked with our
customer to develop better processes for increased production
rates.  I am pleased to report that the process enhancements have
been successfully implemented and we expect to have our highest
shipping rate of products for the FWS-I program in the fourth
quarter of 2021.  As a reminder, the FWS-I thermal sight system
uses a high-precision video 'see-through' AR optical module using
our CyberDisplay LCDs and our custom-designed Pancake optics."
Dr. Fan continued, "Other successes in the third quarter also
included the receipt of a previously reported $1.1 million order to
provide eyepieces for the Joint Effects Targeting System (JETS),
one of the two low rate initial production programs we reported in
the second quarter of 2021, which will be delivered through 2022.
Our third quarter enterprise product revenues increased 65% over
the same quarter last year on the strength of sales into the 3D
Automated Optical Inspection (AOI) market.  During the third
quarter of 2021 we announced a $3.2 million order from JUTZE
Intelligence Technology (JUTZE) for our Spatial Light Modulators
(SLMs) for JUTZE's 3D AOI and 3D Solder Paste Inspection (3D SPI)
equipment. We also continued to make progress in commercializing
our organic light emitting diode display (OLED) technologies with
additional orders for our OLED."

"We are also on track with our defense customer-funded development
programs.  We previously announced two development programs entered
low-rate initial production during the second quarter of 2021 and
we expect another defense development program to enter low-rate
initial production during the fourth quarter of 2021.  In addition,
we have a robust pipeline of defense programs in development which
we expect will fuel our defense revenues in the coming years," said
Dr. Fan.

"In the third quarter of 2021, like most companies, we faced many
supply chain related challenges.  To this point we have not
experienced any material negative effects from gaps in material
availability, however we continue to closely monitor and manage new
challenges."

"In short, our business is strong as we actively innovate and
advance our technology roadmap, paving the path for future growth
in AR/VR/MR applications.  We believe we are the world's only
provider of LCD, LCOS, OLED and micro-LED microdisplays on silicon.
The current market trends indicate exciting and growing
opportunities especially in the Metaverse VR platform.  Kopin was a
pioneer and has been focusing on this radical transformation for
many years as it progresses from defense, to enterprise, and now
into consumer applications.  We believe we are well positioned to
capitalize on these opportunities.  We are looking forward to the
coming CES in January 2022, where we plan to exhibit our recent
exciting developments," concluded Dr. Fan.

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/771266/000115752321001303/a52519669_ex991.htm


                            About Kopin

Kopin Corporation -- http://www.kopin.com-- is a developer and
provider of innovative display and optical technologies sold as
critical components and subassemblies for military, industrial and
consumer products.  Kopin's technology portfolio includes
ultra-small Active Matrix Liquid Crystal displays (AMLCD), Liquid
Crystal on Silicon (LCOS) displays and Organic Light Emitting Diode
(OLED) displays, a variety of optics, and low-power ASICs.

Kopin reported a net loss of $4.53 million for the year ended Dec.
26, 2020, compared to a net loss of $29.37 million for the year
ended Dec. 28, 2019.  As of June 26, 2021, the Company had $57.82
million in total assets, $16.08 million in total current
liabilities, $277,846 in noncurrent contract liabilities and asset
retirement obligations, $488,392 in operating lease liabilities
(net of current portion), $1.33 million in other long-term
obligations, and $39.64 million in total stockholders' equity.


L'INC D'ALINE: Unsecured Creditors to Get $172K in 5 Years
----------------------------------------------------------
L'Inc D'Aline Corporation filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California a Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization and a Disclosure Statement on Nov. 1, 2021.

The Debtor's property in Stanton, California, is the Debtor's
primary asset.  The asset is well managed and is generating
positive cash flow.  On or about Sept. 15, 2021, the Debtor had an
appraisal done for the Property by Retail Petroleum Consultants
LLC.  Pursuant to the appraisal report completed by Retail
Petroleum Consultants LLC on an "as is" market value of the
subject's leased fee real estate based on the market conditions as
of Sept. 1, 2021, the Property has an estimated fair market value
of $3,260,000.

Secured Creditor Ennerdale Corporation Defined Benefit Plan &
Trust, for the benefit of Alan Reay, and Ennerdale Corporation
401K, for the benefit of Alan Reay (collectively, hereinafter,
known as "Ennerdale") hold the first and second deeds of trust on
the Property for a total scheduled claim amount of $1,923,845.  On
December 30, 2020, Poppy Bank, the original holder of the first and
second deeds of trust for the Property, assigned its interest to
Ennerdale pursuant to a Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of Dec.
17, 2020.

The Property is further encumbered by property taxes owed to the
Orange County Treasurer and Tax Collector, and other lienholders
such DSXW Holdings, Inc., Vendor Services Center, Financial Pacific
Leasing, Inc., Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company, LLC, and Lien
Solutions. These secured scheduled claims, including Ennerdale's
claims, total to approximately $3,369,462.23.

Debtor's unsecured priority obligations consist of the Franchise
Tax Board with an estimated scheduled claim of $17,000.00. Debtor's
unsecured non-priority claim consists of Southern California Edison
with an estimated scheduled claim of $17,000.00, which is marked as
contingent, unliquidated and disputed.

Debtor's Principal, Zaal John Haddadin, does not hold any pre
petition claim or any postpetition administrative claim against the
estate.

This is a reorganizing plan that provides for payment to holders of
allowed claims over time. The timing of plan payments to particular
creditor groups will depend upon their classification under the
Plan.

Class 2 consists of General Unsecured Claims. The Debtor estimates
that there are approximately $2,462,880.35 in general unsecured
debts. General unsecured claims classified in Class 2 will receive
a total of approximately 6.97% of their claims in two payments per
each year over five-year period of the Plan, and approximately
7.38% with the proposed new value contribution. The Debtor proposes
to make the first installment to General Unsecured Creditors for
Year #1 in month 6 and months 12; for years 2-5, in month 6 and
month 12 for each of these four years. Total amount the general
unsecured creditors will receive is approximately $171,680. Each
year the Debtor will pay a total sum of $34, 336 in two
installments of $17,168 each for 5 years.

Management of the Reorganized Debtor will remain with its
President, Zaal John Haddadin. Mr. Haddadin, as the President and
CEO of the Debtor, handles the maintenance of the Property and the
collection of the rental income.

The Debtor will fund the Plan from the continued operation of its
business.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated November 01,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/2ZXWmPG from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for Debtor:

     Michael Jay Berger, Esq.
     Law Offices of Michael Jay Berger
     9454 Wilshire Blvd., 6th Floor
     Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2929
     Telephone: (310) 271-6223
     Facsimile: (310) 271-9805
     Email: michael.berger@bankruptcypower.com

                       About L'Inc D'Aline

L'Inc D'Aline Corporation is the owner of the real property located
at 7470 Cerritos Avenue, Stanton, California 90680.  The property
is improved with a gas station and convenience store.

L'Inc D'Aline sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 21-11906) on Aug. 3,
2021.  In the petition signed by CEO Zaal John Haddadin, the Debtor
disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Scott C. Clarkson oversees the case.

Michael Jay Berger, Esq., at the Law Offices of Michael Jay Berger,
is the Debtor's legal counsel.


LATAM AIRLINES: Aires Settles Dispute With Regional One, Dash
-------------------------------------------------------------
LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and certain of its affiliated debtors
filed a motion seeking approval for Aerovias de Integracion
Regional S.A. ("Aires") to enter into a settlement with Regional
One, Inc. and Dash 224, LLC to resolve a claims dispute and a
decade-long commercial disagreement, which has resulted in two
litigations in two countries.  

On Dec. 16, 2020, Regional One filed Claim No. 1996 against Aires
and Claim No. 2361 against LATAM Parent.  Also on Dec. 16, 2020,
Dash filed Claim No. 1997 against Aires and Claim No. 2009 against
LATAM Parent.  Each of the Chapter 11 Claims assert that Aires is
liable in the amount of $28,000,000 based on a potential finding of
damages by the Florida Court against Aires in the Consolidated
Action.  

Aires and two claimants, Regional One and Dash successfully
resolved their ongoing disputes at a mediation that took place
pursuant to the ADR Procedures approved by the Bankruptcy Court.
Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the approval of which
the Debtors' seek in this Motion, Dash will have an allowed claim
against Aires in an amount significantly less than its proof of
claim, and the Parties will each dismiss pending litigations
against one another in Colombia and Florida, among other releases.


According to a 39-page motion seeking approval of the settlement,
the Debtors believe that it is reasonable to enter into the
Settlement Agreement.  Aires will reduce the size of its claims
pool by almost $20 million in asserted liabilities and avoid the
need to set aside reserved funds related to the disputed claims as
part of its reorganization plan.  Further, although the Debtors
believe that they would prevail if the underlying litigation in
Florida was decided in a jury trial, settlement avoids the
additional costs of such proceedings and the risk of an
unpredictable adverse judgment that could far exceed the
size of the settlement amount.  

The terms of the Settlement Agreement are as follows:

   * Subject to approval from the Bankruptcy Court, Aires agrees
that Dash shall have a valid allowed prepetition general unsecured
claim against Aires in the amount of $9,550,000 (the "Allowed
Claim").

   * Within 20 days of entry of the Proposed Order, Dash and
Regional One will take action to cause the dismissal, with
prejudice, of the Consolidated Litigation against Aires.

   * Following entry of the Settlement Order and within 20 business
days of dismissal of the Consolidated Litigation against Aires,
Aires will take action to cause the dismissal, with prejudice, of
Regional One and Dash from the Colombian Action.

   * The Parties agree to a mutual release of any claims arising
out of or in  connection with the Aircraft, the Lease, the Letter
Agreement, or the Aircraft Litigations.

   * Each Party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs
arising out of or relating to the Aircraft Litigations and the
Settlement Agreement.

                     About LATAM Airlines Group

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. -- http://www.latam.com/-- is a
pan-Latin American airline holding company involved in the
transportation of passengers and cargo and operates as one unified
business enterprise. It is the largest passenger airline in South
America.

Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, LATAM offered passenger
transport services to 145 different destinations in 26 countries,
including domestic flights in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador and Peru, and international services within Latin America
as well as to Europe, the United States, the Caribbean, Oceania,
Asia and Africa.

LATAM and its 28 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11254) on May 25, 2020. Affiliates in
Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the United States are part of
the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors disclosed $21,087,806,000 in total assets and
$17,958,629,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting as restructuring advisor, Lee
Brock Camargo Advogados as local Brazilian litigation counsel, and
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Claro & Cia in Chile as special
counsel.  The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. and The Boston
Consulting Group UK LLP serve as the Debtors' strategic advisors.
Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Dechert LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP as conflicts counsel, UBS
Securities LLC as investment banker, and Conway MacKenzie, LLC as
financial advisor. Ferro Castro Neves Daltro & Gomide Advogados is
the committee's Brazilian counsel.

The Ad Hoc Group of LATAM Bondholders tapped White & Case LLP as
counsel.

Glenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes, LLP, led by managing partner Andrew
Glenn and partner Shai Schmidt, has been retained as counsel to the
Ad Hoc Committee of Shareholders.




LATAM AIRLINES: Kramer Levin 2nd Update on Parent Claimants
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of LATAM Airlines Group S.A., et al., the
law firm of Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP submitted a second
verified statement under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure, to disclose an updated list of members of the
Parent Ad Hoc Claimant Group.

As of Oct. 27, 2021, members of the Parent Ad Hoc Claimant Group
and their disclosable economic interests are:

Aurelius Capital Management, LP
535 Madison Avenue, 31st Floor
New York, NY 10022

* Holder of approximately $84,866,520.00 of Claims against LATAM,
  $41,668,985.00 in other Claims against subsidiary Debtors, and
  780,837 of local shares of common stock.

Barclays Bank PLC
745 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019

* Holder of approximately $18,000,000 of Claims against LATAM,
  $35,714,000 of 2024 Notes, and $17,992,000 of 2026 Notes.

Citigroup Financial Products, Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
Tower Building
New York, NY 10013

* Holder of approximately $37,909,707.00 of Claims against LATAM,
  $1,727,000.00 of 2024 Notes, $17,700,000.00 of 2026 Notes,
  $24,750,000 of the Revolving Credit Facility,6 $59,181,001.00 in
  other Claims against subsidiary Debtors, and $317,716.00 in
  administrative expense claims.

Cross Ocean Partners Management LP
20 Horseneck Lane
Greenwich, CT 06830

* Holder of approximately $28,072,319.42 of Claims against LATAM,
  $7,826,129.37 in other Claims against subsidiary Debtors,
  $26,558,675.15 of the Bradesco Loan,7 and $66,156,500.48 of the
  Banco do Brasil Loan.

Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
One Columbus Circle 7th Floor
New York, New York 10019

* Holder of approximately $58,633,291.00 of Claims against LATAM
  and $40,000,000.00 in other Claims against subsidiary Debtors.

Grosvenor Capital Management, L.P.
900 North Michigan Avenue
Suite 1100
Chicago, IL 60611

* Holder of approximately $30,594,543.54 of Claims against LATAM,
  $23,769,000.00 of 2024 Notes, and $17,180,000.00 of 2026 Notes.


Monarch Alternative Capital LP
535 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022

* Holder of approximately $148,964,158.96 of Claims against LATAM,
  $30,438,000 of 2024 Notes, and $78,127,000 of 2026 Notes.

Olympus Peak Asset Management LP
745 Fifth Avenue Suite 1604
New York, NY 10151

* Holder of approximately $211,139,238.00 of Claims against LATAM,
  $16,000,000 of 2024 Notes, $5,000,000 of 2026 Notes,
  $23,857,515.83 of other Claims against subsidiary Debtors, and
  $532,250.11 of administrative expense claims.

P. Schoenfeld Asset Management L.P.
1350 Avenue of the Americas
21st Floor New York, NY 10019

* Holder of approximately $15,500,001.00 of Claims against LATAM,
  $9,100,000.00 of 2024 Notes, and $21,250,000.00 of 2026 Notes.

Sculptor Capital LP
9 West 57th Street 39th Floor
New York, NY 10019

* Holder of a 50% interest in Sajama Investments LLC, $38,621,000
  of 2024 Notes, $46,375,000 of 2026 Notes, and $28,058.09 of
  2015-1B EETCs.

Silver Point Capital, L.P.
Two Greenwich Plaza
Greenwich, CT 06830

* Holder of approximately $93,558,448.14 in filed, face amounts of
  Claims against LATAM, $29,265,000 of 2024 Notes, $55,041,000 of
  2026 Notes, and $34,737,991 of the Spare Engine Facility.

Sixth Street Partners, LLC
345 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104

* Holder of $1,127,999,998.00 of Claims against LATAM, a 50%
  interest in Sajama Investments, LLC, $58,052,000 of 2024 Notes,
  $72,470,000 of 2026 Notes, and $23,847.19 of 2015-1B EETCs.

Strategic Value Partners
100 West Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, CT 06830

* Holder of $1,130,969,987.53 of Claims against LATAM and certain
  related claims filed against Debtor subsidiaries.

Third Point LLC
55 Hudson Yards
New York, NY 10001

* Holder of approximately $95,040,000 of Claims against LATAM,
  $9,500,000 of 2024 Notes and $25,000,000 of 2026 Notes.

Varde Partners, Inc.
901 Marquette Avenue South
Suite 3300
Minneapolis, MN 55402

* Holder of approximately $106,505,276.00 of Claims against LATAM,
  $70,575,000.00 of 2024 Notes, and $64,269,000.00 of 2026 Notes.

On or about June 9, 2021, the Parent Ad Hoc Claimant Group retained
Kramer Levin to represent it in connection with the above-captioned
Chapter 11 Cases.

Each member of the Parent Ad Hoc Claimant Group has consented to
Kramer Levin's representation.

Kramer Levin reserves the right to amend or supplement this
Statement.

Counsel to the Parent Ad Hoc Claimant Group can be reached at:

          KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
          Kenneth H. Eckstein, Esq.
          Douglas H. Mannal, Esq.
          Rachael L. Ringer, Esq.
          Douglas Buckley, Esq.
          1177 Avenue of the Americas
          New York, NY 10036
          Telephone: (212) 715-9100
          Facsimile: (212) 715-8000
          E-mail: keckstein@kramerlevin.com
                  dmannal@kramerlevin.com
                  rringer@kramerlevin.com
                  dbuckley@kramerlevin.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://bit.ly/3k8k82J

                    About LATAM Airlines Group

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. -- http://www.latam.com/-- is a
pan-Latin American airline holding company involved in the
transportation of passengers and cargo and operates as one unified
business enterprise.  It is the largest passenger airline in South
America.

Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, LATAM offered passenger
transport services to 145 different destinations in 26 countries,
including domestic flights in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador and Peru, and international services within Latin America
as well as to Europe, the United States, the Caribbean, Oceania,
Asia and Africa.

LATAM and its 28 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11254) on May 25, 2020.  Affiliates in
Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the United States are part of
the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors disclosed $21,087,806,000 in total assets and
$17,958,629,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting as restructuring advisor, Lee
Brock Camargo Advogados as local Brazilian litigation counsel, and
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Claro & Cia in Chile as special
counsel.  The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. and The Boston
Consulting Group UK LLP serve as the Debtors' strategic advisors.
Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Dechert LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP as conflicts counsel, UBS
Securities LLC as investment banker, and Conway MacKenzie, LLC as
financial advisor.  Ferro Castro Neves Daltro & Gomide Advogados is
the committee's Brazilian counsel.

The Ad Hoc Group of LATAM Bondholders tapped White & Case LLP as
counsel.

Glenn Agre Bergman & Fuentes, LLP, led by managing partner Andrew
Glenn and partner Shai Schmidt, has been retained as counsel to the
Ad Hoc Committee of Shareholders.


LEGENDARY FIELD: Bankr. Court OKs Settlement of Class Claims
------------------------------------------------------------
The Alliance of American Football ("AAF") was formed in 2018 as a
new professional football league with teams located in eight cities
around the United States. Initially, Ebersol Sports Media Group,
LLC ("ESMG") directly or indirectly owned 100% of the interest in
each of the entities that comprised the AAF. In early 2018, AAF
arranged more than $200 million in financing through stock sales,
convertible debt, and a convertible credit line. By late 2018,
however, AAF received only sporadic funding by the line of credit
investor. In February 2019, Thomas Dundon committed additional
funding to the AAF in exchange for full control of ESMG's board of
directors and AAF's business decisions.

After hiring players, hosting pre-season training camps, and
playing eight out of ten first season football games, AAF suspended
its operations on April 2, 2019.  On April 10, 2019, Colton Schmidt
and Reggie Northrup filed a Putative Class Action Complaint for
Damages against AAF, Dundon and Charles Ebersol in the Superior
Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco.

On April 17, 2019, co-defendants AAF Players, LLC; AAF Properties,
LLC; Legendary Field Exhibitions, LLC; and Ebersol Sports Media
Group, Inc. -- AAF Defendants -- each filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy
case in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District
of Texas, San Antonio Division. After a hearing on July 3, 2019,
the Court substantively consolidated all of the AAF Defendants'
bankruptcy cases into one lead case numbered 19-50900-cag.

Post-petition, the Lead Plaintiffs' Putative Class Action Complaint
for Damages was removed to the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California and transferred to the United
States District Court for the Western District of Texas. On July
23, 2019, the Texas Western District Court referred Lead
Plaintiffs' lawsuit against AAF, Dundon, and Ebersol to the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas, San
Antonio Division, which is styled as Adv No. 19-05053-cag. The AAF
Adversary asserts these claims:

   * Against the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate: breach of contract,
breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing,
promissory estoppel, California Business and Professions Code
Section 17200 et seq., fraud, and promissory fraud.

   * Against Ebersol: promissory estoppel, fraud, and promissory
fraud.

   * Against Dundon: fraud and promissory fraud.

The Lead Plaintiffs also filed a putative proof of claim in the
bankruptcy case (Claim No. 214), seeking more than $673 million in
actual and exemplary damages based on theories in contract,
quasi-contract, common law, and statutory tort actions.
Additionally, the Putative Class Claim includes breach of contract
claims for players' wages under the Standard Player Agreement,
which the Lead Plaintiffs contend are entitled to priority under
Section 507(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Bankruptcy Court issued an order dated October 26, 2021,
granting the application to approve the compromise and settlement
agreement among the trustee of the Chapter 7 cases of Legendary
Field Exhibitions and its debtor-affiliates, the Lead Plaintiffs,
and Ebersol.

Based on the evidence and argument, the Court finds that awarding
each member of the Settlement Players Class a general unsecured
claim for $180,000 representing the second and third-year base
compensation -- a claim that would be subordinated to any claim
properly held by Dundon, DCP, and any other unsecured creditor --
is a reasonable outcome. The Trustee, according to the Court, has
sufficiently demonstrated he exercised sound business judgment in
negotiating the terms of the Settlement.  For example, the Trustee
testified at the hearing on this Application that "there is $3.9
million in the Estate now, and it is unlikely the Players will ever
see the money for their subordinated unsecured claim." The Trustee
was able to negotiate on behalf of the Estate "an assignment of any
of Plaintiffs' claims against Charles Ebersol and of all claims
under the [SPAs]" in exchange for a subordinated unsecured claim.
The Court concludes this portion of the settlement is "fair and
equitable" and "in the best interests of the estate."

The Court finds credible the Trustee's belief that failure to
settle the Settlement Players Class' claims against Ebersol and the
Estate would "almost certainly deplete available Estate funds and
make it impossible for the Debtors' Estate to bring any additional
claims it may have."  The Declaration of Randolph N. Osherow in
Support of Application to Approve Settlement Compromise Under Rule
9019 states that "the settlement on the terms proposed likely
represents the only chance that the Estate will have to settle with
the Plaintiffs in this litigation, or to prevent defense costs from
consuming most of what remains in the Estate."  The Declaration of
Brian S. Engel in Support of Application to Approve Compromise
Under Rule 9019 declares, "if the Estate was required to remain in
litigation, higher priority administrative claims stemming from
defense costs would likely consume a large portion, if not all of
the remaining current Estate funds, which are just less than $4
million."  The Estate has limited funds to pay creditors, and
protracted litigation would "create administrative claims that
would substantially reduce, and maybe even consume the remaining
Estate." Therefore, the Court is satisfied that factor two in Am.
Can. Co. v. Herpel (In re Jackson Brewing Co.), is met.

The Court defers to the Trustee's business judgment as to the claim
against Ebersol. The Court acknowledges the Trustee's
representation that failure to settle the Settlement Players Class'
claims against Ebersol and the Estate would "almost certainly
deplete available Estate funds and make it impossible for the
Debtors' Estate to bring any additional claims it may have." The
Court also concludes the settlement is in the best interest of
creditors because -- as stated by the Trustee -- "the settlement on
the terms proposed likely represents the only chance that the
Estate will have to settle with the Plaintiffs in this litigation,
or to prevent defense costs from consuming most of what remains in
the Estate." Therefore, the Court concludes that the third factor
in Jackson Brewing Co. is satisfied.

A full-text copy of the decision is available at
https://tinyurl.com/2j99np74 from Leagle.com.

The Chapter 7 cases are N RE: LEGENDARY FIELD EXHIBITIONS, LLC, AAF
PLAYERS, LLC; AAF PROPERTIES, LLC; EBERSOL SPORTS MEDIA GROUP,
INC.; LFE 2, LLC; WE ARE REALTIME, LLC., Chapter 7, Debtors,
Jointly Administered Under Case No. 19-50900-cag, Case No.
19-50902-cag., 19-50903-cag, 19-50904-cag, 19-50905-cag,
19-50906-cag (Bankr. W.D. Tex.).


LTL MANAGEMENT: Talc Committee Approved Over Venue Concerns
-----------------------------------------------------------
Vince Sullivan of Law360 reports that a North Carolina bankruptcy
judge approved the appointment of an 11-member committee of talc
claimants in the Chapter 11 case of Johnson & Johnson subsidiary
LTL Management LLC Thursday, November 4, 2021, saying he would
entertain proposed additions or changes to the group after dealing
with a venue transfer motion next week.

During a hearing in Charlotte, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge J. Craig
Whitley said he was adopting the committee as proposed by the U.S.
bankruptcy administrator because the claimants need to get to work
on coordinating their efforts in the case.

                       About LTL Management

LTL Management LLC is a newly formed subsidiary of Johnson &
Johnson (J&J) to manage and defend thousands of talc-related claims
and oversee the operations of its subsidiary, Royalty A&M, which
owns a portfolio of royalty revenue streams,including royalty
revenue streams based on third-party sales of LACTAID,
MYLANTA/MYLICON and ROGAINE products.

J&J is an American multinational corporation founded in 1886 that
develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and consumer packaged
goods. It is the world's largest and most broadly based healthcare
company.

LTL Management filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case
No. 21-30589) on Oct. 14, 2021. The Debtor was estimated to have $1
billion to $10 billion in assets and liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.
  
The Hon. J. Craig Whitley is the case judge.

The Debtor tapped Jones Day and Rayburn Cooper & Durham, P.A. as
bankruptcy counsel; King & Spalding, LLP and Shook, Hardy & Bacon
LLP as special counsel; McCarter & English, LLP as litigation
consultant; Bates White, LLC as financial consultant; and
AlixPartners, LLP as restructuring advisor. Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC is the claims agent.

                     About Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is an American multinational corporation
founded in 1886 that develops medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and
consumer packaged goods. J&J is the world's largest and most
broadly based healthcare company.

Johnson & Johnson is headquartered in New Brunswick, New Jersey,
the consumer division being located in Skillman, New Jersey. The
corporation includes some 250 subsidiary companies with operations
in 60 countries and products sold in over 175 countries.

Johnson & Johnson had worldwide sales of $82.6 billion during
calendar year 2020.


MALLINCKRODT PLC: Can Use Chapter 11 to Duck Acthar Royalties
-------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Archer of Law360 reports that a bankruptcy judge in Delaware
Thursday, November 4, 2021, ruled drugmaker Mallinckrodt can use
Chapter 11 to escape royalty payments for the sale of its Acthar
Gel medication as the confirmation hearing for the company's
restructuring plan continued.

At a virtual hearing, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn found the
Bankruptcy Code allowed Mallinckrodt to reject one royalty
agreement and discharge its payment obligations under another as
part of its Chapter 11 case.  Mallinckrodt and its affiliates filed
for Chapter 11 in 2020, with a restructuring support agreement to
cut $1 billion worth of debt from the $5.3 billion case.

                      About Mallinckrodt PLC

Mallinckrodt -- http://www.mallinckrodt.com/-- is a global
business consisting of multiple wholly-owned subsidiaries that
develop, manufacture, market and distribute specialty
pharmaceutical products and therapies.  The company's Specialty
Brands reportable segment's areas of focus include autoimmune and
rare diseases in specialty areas like neurology, rheumatology,
nephrology, pulmonology and ophthalmology; immunotherapy and
neonatal respiratory critical care therapies; analgesics; and
gastrointestinal products.  Its Specialty Generics reportable
segment includes specialty generic drugs and active pharmaceutical
ingredients.

On Oct. 12, 2020, Mallinckrodt plc and certain of its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection in Delaware (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 20-12522) to seek approval of a restructuring that would reduce
total debt by $1.3 billion and resolve opioid-related claims
against them.

Mallinckrodt plc disclosed $9,584,626,122 in assets and
$8,647,811,427 in liabilities as of Sept. 25, 2020.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Latham & Watkins LLP and Richards, Layton &
Finger P.A. as their bankruptcy counsel; Arthur Cox and Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz as corporate and finance counsel; Ropes & Gray
LLP as litigation counsel; Torys LLP as CCAA counsel; Guggenheim
Securities LLC as investment banker; and AlixPartners LLP as
restructuring advisor. Prime Clerk, LLC, is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Cooley LLP
as its legal counsel, Robinson & Cole LLP as co-counsel, and Dundon
Advisers LLC as its financial advisor.

On Oct. 27, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an
official committee of opioid related claimants. The OCC tapped Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as its lead counsel, Cole Schotz as
Delaware co-counsel, Province Inc. as financial advisor, and
Jefferies LLC as investment banker.

A confirmation trial for the Debtors' First Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization is set to begin Nov. 1, 2021.  The Confirmation
Hearing will be bifurcated into two phases. Phase 1 will commence
the week of Nov. 1.  The Confirmation Hearing will continue with
Phase 2 on or around the week of Nov. 15, when the Acthar
Administrative Claims Hearing proceedings concludes.


MALLINCKRODT PLC: Cleared by Court on $94 Mil. Ch.11 Bond Penalty
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Archer, writing for Law360, reports that a Delaware bankruptcy
judge on Friday, November 5, 2021, found Mallinckrodt does not owe
a $94 million payment to noteholders, saying the creditors should
not get a "windfall" simply as a result of the drugmaker's Chapter
11 filing.

At a virtual hearing, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn said the
Bankruptcy Code allows Mallinckrodt to reinstate its first-lien
notes in its Chapter 11 plan without allowing the bondholders to
"extract a penalty and collect a windfall" under the bonds' default
provisions.

                      About Mallinckrodt PLC

Mallinckrodt -- http://www.mallinckrodt.com/-- is a global
business consisting of multiple wholly-owned subsidiaries that
develop, manufacture, market and distribute specialty
pharmaceutical products and therapies. The company's Specialty
Brands reportable segment's areas of focus include autoimmune and
rare diseases in specialty areas like neurology, rheumatology,
nephrology, pulmonology and ophthalmology; immunotherapy and
neonatal respiratory critical care therapies; analgesics; and
gastrointestinal products. Its Specialty Generics reportable
segment includes specialty generic drugs and active pharmaceutical
ingredients.

On Oct. 12, 2020, Mallinckrodt plc and certain of its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection in Delaware (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 20-12522) to seek approval of a restructuring that would reduce
total debt by $1.3 billion and resolve opioid-related claims
against them.

Mallinckrodt plc disclosed $9,584,626,122 in assets and
$8,647,811,427 in liabilities as of Sept. 25, 2020.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Latham & Watkins LLP and Richards, Layton &
Finger P.A. as their bankruptcy counsel; Arthur Cox and Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz as corporate and finance counsel; Ropes & Gray
LLP as litigation counsel; Torys LLP as CCAA counsel; Guggenheim
Securities LLC as investment banker; and AlixPartners LLP as
restructuring advisor. Prime Clerk, LLC, is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Cooley LLP
as its legal counsel, Robinson & Cole LLP as co-counsel, and Dundon
Advisers LLC as its financial advisor.

On Oct. 27, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an
official committee of opioid related claimants. The OCC tapped Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as its lead counsel, Cole Schotz as
Delaware co-counsel, Province Inc. as financial advisor, and
Jefferies LLC as investment banker.

A confirmation trial for the Debtors' First Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization is set to begin Nov. 1, 2021.  The Confirmation
Hearing will be bifurcated into two phases.  Phase 1 will commence
the week of Nov. 1. 2021.  The Confirmation Hearing will continue
with Phase 2 on or around the week of Nov. 15, when the Acthar
Administrative Claims Hearing proceedings concludes.


MARA DAY: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------
Mara Day Spa, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas, Dallas Division, for authority to use cash
collateral and provide adequate protection.

The Debtor must use Cash Collateral to maintain operations, pay
utilities, and cover other overhead expenses required for the
maximization of the value of the Debtor's assets through the
bankruptcy process for the benefit of its estate and creditors.

The Reorganization Case is intended to provide MDS a forum for the
orderly and efficient reorganization of its assets and satisfaction
of outstanding obligations, including working to refinance or
restructure its debts. MDS believes this process will be in the
best interests of its creditors and estate. These parties have
asserted or may assert secured claims to MDS's deposit accounts and
cash:

     a. Allergan, Inc., located at 5 Giralda Farms, Madison, NJ
07940. The Debtor does not know of any current indebtedness to
Allergan.

     b. C.T. Corporation System as representative of Ascentium
Capital, located at 330 N. Brand Blvd., Ste. 700, ATTN: SPRS,
Glendale, CA 91203. The Debtor does not know of any prepetition
indebtedness to CTC or Ascentium Capital.

     c. McKesson Corp., located at 4345 Southpoint Blvd.,
Jacksonville, FL 32216. The Debtor anticipates McKesson would
allege a security interest in the Cash Collateral pertaining to
trade receivables with MDS. Debtor estimates that as of the
Petition Date, $5,215.26 is alleged owed to McKesson.

     d. U.S. Small Business Administration, located at 10737
Gateway West, #300, El Paso, TX 79935. The Debtor anticipates SBA
would assert a security interest in the Cash Collateral pertaining
to an "EIDL" grant, of which $159,900 is alleged owed to SBA as of
the Petition Date;

     e. Secured Lender Solutions as representative of unknown
creditor, located at P.O. Box 2576, Springfield, IL 62708 and/or
266 Harristown Road, Ste. 304, Glen Rock, NJ 07452; and

     f. H Melton Ventures, LLC, c/o Marilyn Garner, Chapter 7
Trustee, located at 2001 E. Lamar Blvd., Suite 200, Arlington, TX
76006. The Debtor anticipates HMV would allege a security interest
pertaining to an Agreed Judgment against the Debtor. The Debtor
anticipates HMV would allege a balance of approximately $150,000
owed thereunder as of the Petition Date.

The Prepetition Indebtedness was identified following the Debtor's
review of UCC Financing Statements filed with the Texas Secretary
of State and a review of the Debtor's own records for deposit
account control agreements. The identified Secured Creditors assert
that their respective indebtedness is secured by liens on certain
of the Debtor's assets as identified by the respective Secured
Creditors' Loans.

As adequate protection for the use of Cash Collateral, the Debtor
requests that the Court grant the Secured Creditors a general plus
priority and continuing lien upon and security interest in and to
all of the Debtor's right, title, and interests in, to, and against
the Secured Creditors' collateral, acquired by the Debtor after the
Petition Date. Such replacement liens will be granted only to the
extent necessary to replenish the diminution in value as of the
Petition Date of the Secured Creditors' perfected pre-petition
liens and security interest and will not exceed the amount,
priority, validity, perfection or enforceability of the Secured
Creditors' lien position and rights as of the Petition Date.

The Debtor requests immediate authorization to use Cash Collateral
for operating purposes as set forth in the Budget, with a 15%
variance.
A copy of the motion is available at https://bit.ly/3bKnioR from
PacerMonitor.com.

                       About Mara Day Spa, LLC

Mara Day Spa, LLC is a health and beauty spa founded in 2017 that
operates in the Dallas, Texas area, providing customers with
skincare products, treatments, injectables, and various other
services.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 21-31928) on October 27,
2021. In the petition signed by Ledimara Pinney, president, the
Debtor disclosed up to $50 million in assets and up to $10 million
in liabilities.

Mark A. Castillo, Esq., at Curtis | Castillo PC is the Debtor's
counsel.



MENUCHA ENTERPRISES: Unsecureds Will Get 22.9% of Claims in Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Menucha Enterprise LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado an Amended Plan of Reorganization dated
October 29, 2021.

Menucha's case is jointly administered with the case of Bezh
Services, LLC, but the cases are not substantively consolidated.
They are two separate cases in Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Bezh moved to dismiss its case by Motion filed contemporaneously
with the filing of this Plan, which Motion is pending.

Menucha and Bezh are both Colorado limited liability companies that
own and manage residential real property. Their principal, Aharon
Sirota, established Menucha in 2016 and began to acquire rental
properties. Menucha's primary lender, Cost Fund I, LLC ("Cost
Fund"), provided an acquisition loan for each property but one.

Bezh and Menucha financed each but one property acquisition with
Cost Fund, which charged non-default interest at 14% per annum.
Until Covid-19 hit the United States, Bezh and Menucha remained
current on their payments to Cost Fund. Covid-19 changed everything
as many tenants lost their jobs and were unable to pay rent, and
the State of Colorado prohibited Bezh and Menucha from evicting
tenants.

As a result, Menucha and Bezh defaulted on their loans to Cost
Fund, and these loans provided for default interest at the rate of
24% per annum. Cost Fund eventually initiated foreclosure
proceedings against a number of the Menucha and Bezh properties and
even sought appointment of a receiver in relation to the Bezh
properties. Thus, on February 17, 2021 and March 9, 2021, Bezh and
Menucha, respectively, filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11, Subchapter V, of the Bankruptcy Code.

Seven properties have since been sold in this bankruptcy case –
four belonging to Bezh and three belonging to Menucha.
Additionally, there is a sale order in place regarding another
property - (12285 East 50th Avenue, Denver, CO 80239 – a Menucha
property – though Menucha is unsure if that deal will ultimately
close. Menucha will continue to seek to sell properties to maximize
the value to Cost Fund while the properties remain in the
bankruptcy estate.

Class I consists of those unsecured creditors of the Menucha. Class
I shall be paid upon the sale of the real property located at 1304
S. Parker Road, #155, Denver, Colorado. Based on Menucha
projections, Menucha estimates that the total amount available for
payment of Class I Claims will be $117,700.00. Based on the
information available to Menucha, non insider claims in Class I are
estimated at $514,091.58. Based on the estimated distributions,
Class I Claimants are anticipated to receive 22.9% of their allowed
claims.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Mr. Sirota shall
not receive any distribution on account of any Allowed Class I
Claim unless and until any other Class I Claims are paid in full.

Class J includes the Interest in Menucha held by its
preconfirmation member. Class J is unimpaired by this Plan. On the
Effective Date of the Plan, Class J shall retain its Interest in
Menucha which he owned prior to the Confirmation Date, subject to
the terms of the Plan.

Menucha's Plan is premised upon the sale of the property located at
1304 S. Parker Road, #155, Denver, Colorado, which property is
entirely unencumbered. Considering the current residential real
estate market in the Denver area, selling the property should not
be difficult. The Plan provides for the property to be sold within
one year of the Effective Date, which is feasible. That property
will produce sufficient funds to cover ongoing expenses and
administrative expense claims, as well as make a distribution to
general unsecured creditors. Menucha has used its best efforts to
prepare accurate projections.

Menucha has based payments to I Unsecured Creditors on net proceeds
of the sale of 1304 S. Parker Road, #155, Denver, Colorado. Upon
the sale of that property, the projections reflect that payment to
the unsecured creditors is feasible.

Menucha estimates its creditors would receive approximately a 16%
distribution in a Chapter 7, which increases to 19% in non-insider
debt is excluded. In contrast, Menucha's Plan provides that
unsecured creditors will receive approximately 22.9% of their
allowed claims.

A full-text copy of the Amended Plan of Reorganization dated
October 29, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3BLhXs5 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.  

Attorneys for Menucha Enterprises:

     Jeffrey S. Brinen, #20565
     Jonathan M. Dickey, #46981
     Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, P.C.
     1660 Lincoln St., Suite 1720
     Denver, CO 80264
     Telephone: 303- 832-2400
     Email: jsb@kutnerlaw.com

                  About Menucha Enterprise

Menucha Enterprise LLC is a Denver-based company primarily engaged
in renting and leasing real estate properties.

Menucha Enterprise filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No.
21-11106) on March 9, 2021.  Aharon Sirota, managing member, signed
the petition.  In the petition, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Thomas B. McNamara oversees the case.

The Law Offices of Kevin S. Neiman, PC represents the Debtor as
legal counsel.


METHODIST UNIVERSITY: S&P Rates 2021 Revenue Refunding Bonds 'BB'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' long-term rating to Methodist
University, N.C.'s series 2021 revenue refunding bonds. At the same
time, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB' long-term rating on
Methodist's 2012 revenue bonds. The outlook is stable. Where
possible, S&P has reported fiscal 2021 financial data sourced from
draft financial statements, and it does not expect material changes
to these figures when the university's audit is finalized.

MU is issuing $27.4 million of series 2021 bonds to refund its
outstanding debt: the 2012 fixed-rate revenue bonds and the 2014
variable-rate direct-placement bonds. MU will also use cash to
eliminate the swap associated with the 2014 debt. The transaction
will bring total pro forma debt to approximately $27.8 million and
will result in net present value savings.

"We assessed MU's enterprise profile as vulnerable, characterized
by decent selectivity, improved retention, and a unique
military-focused niche due to its access to Fort Bragg, one of the
nation's largest army bases," said S&P Global Ratings credit
analyst Megan Kearns. We believe this is offset by a small student
body, with five consecutive years of declines in application
numbers and a cumulative enrollment decline of over 15% since fall
2017.

"We assessed MU's financial profile as adequate, with a
strengthened balance sheet and rapidly amortizing debt service
schedule, which will no longer include variable-rate debt," Ms.
Kearns added. This is offset by our opinion that the university has
limited financial flexibility and high student dependence.

S&P believes these credit factors, combined, lead to an indicative
stand-alone credit profile of 'bb' and a final rating of 'BB'.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our opinion of the
university's enrollment growth in fall 2021 and improved balance
sheet, which provides cushion at the current rating. Additionally,
MU has implemented careful control over expenses in recent years,
including the stabilization of its discount rate in fiscal 2021.
Supported by remaining federal funds, the university is likely to
generate at least break-even operations in fiscal 2022.

"We could consider a positive rating action if the university
continues to stabilize or improve its enrollment levels and demand
profile. In particular, we would view improved selectivity
positively. Additionally, we would expect the university to return
to break-even or positive operations without the support of federal
relief funds while maintaining or improving financial resources.

"We could consider a negative rating action if the university's
enrollment experiences additional material declines accompanied by
significant reductions in net tuition revenue and operating margins
that drive financial resources below those of the current rating.
We could also consider a negative rating action if the university
were to issue additional debt without commensurate growth in
financial resources."


MID ATLANTIC PRINTERS: Taps Magee Goldstein Lasky as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mid Atlantic Printers, Ltd. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Virginia to employ Magee
Goldstein Lasky & Sayers, P.C. to serve as legal counsel in its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm's services include:

   a. advising the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties in
the continued management and operation of its business and
properties;

   b. advising and consulting on the conduct of the bankruptcy
case, including all of the legal and administrative requirements of
operating in Chapter 11;

   c. attending meetings and negotiating with representatives of
creditors and other parties-in-interest;

   d. taking all necessary action to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate, including prosecuting actions on the Debtor's
behalf, defending any actions commenced against the Debtor, and
representing the Debtor's interests in negotiations concerning all
litigation in which it is involved, including objections to claims
filed against the estate;

   e. preparing legal papers;

   f. representing the Debtor in connection with obtaining
post-petition financing, if necessary;

   g. advising the Debtor in connection with any potential sale of
assets;

   h. appearing before the court;

   i. taking any necessary action to negotiate, prepare and obtain
approval of a Chapter 11 plan and documents related thereto; and

   j. performing all other necessary legal services, including (i)
analyzing the Debtor's leases and contracts and the assumption,
rejection or assignment thereof, (ii) analyzing the validity of
liens against the Debtor; and (iii) advising the Debtor on
corporate and litigation matters.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Attorneys                       $250 to $400 per hour
     Paralegals/paraprofessionals    $100 per hour

Magee will be paid a retainer in the amount of $15,000 and
reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Andrew Goldstein, Esq., a partner at Magee, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Andrew S. Goldstein, Esq.
     Magee Goldstein Lasky & Sayers, P.C.
     P.O. Box 404
     Roanoke, VA 24003-0404
     Tel: (540) 343-9800
     Fax: (540) 343-9898
     Email: agoldstein@mglspc.com

                 About Mid Atlantic Printers Ltd.

Mid Atlantic Printers, Ltd. is a full service commercial sheet fed
printer, with two production facilities and multiple sales offices.
The Altavista, Va.-based company offers commercial printing
services.

Mid Atlantic Printers filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. W.D. Va. Case No. 21-61173) on Oct. 27, 2021, listing up to
$10 million in assets and up to $1 million in liabilities.  Nancy
Edwards, president of Mid Atlantic Printers, signed the petition.  


Andrew S. Goldstein, Esq., at Magee Goldstein Lasky & Sayers, P.C.
serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


MIKEN OIL: Unsecureds Will Get 40% of Claims in 60 Months
---------------------------------------------------------
Miken Oil, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Texas a Second Amended Plan of Reorganization
dated November 1, 2021.

The Debtor filed this case on March 26, 2021 with the goal of
returning to complete operations and proposing a repayment plan for
its creditors. The Debtor's business depends on the price of oil.
It is anticipated that after confirmation, the Debtor will continue
in business. Based upon the projections of Disposable Income, the
Debtor believes it can service the debt to the Creditors.

The Debtor is currently owned 100% by Mike Tate. After confirmation
Mr. Tate will remain the president and sole owner. Mr. Tate will
receive a salary of $127,494.96 per annum.

Class 7 consists of Allowed General Unsecured Claims in the amount
of $1,600,000.00. The holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims shall
share pro rata in the Reorganized Debtor's Disposable Income and in
the assets of the Litigation Trust.

     * The Reorganized Debtor shall pay to the trustee an initial
payment of $25,000.00 on or before October 1, 2021. Thereafter, the
Reorganized Debtor shall make monthly payments to the Trustee of
$12,500.00 each (the "Plan Payment"), beginning on December 1, 2021
and continuing regularly and monthly thereafter on the first day of
each succeeding calendar month for a total of 60 months. $12,500.00
is the Debtor's average projection of its average Disposable Income
at the time of Confirmation.

     * On the Effective Date, the Reorganized Debtor shall also pay
to the Litigation Trustee as an initial fund for the Litigation
Trust the sum of $10,000.00.

     * Based upon the Debtor's current schedules the Class 7
creditors will receive approximately 40% of their Allowed Claims
under this Plan, however, this amount may change depending on the
outcome of any objections to, or motions to estimate the amount of
claims.

     * The Class 7 creditors are impaired.

Class 10 (Current Owners) are not impaired under the Plan and will
receive no payments under th Plan; however, he will be allowed to
retain his ownership in the Debtor.

Debtor anticipates the continued operations of the business to fund
the Plan. Moreover, payments to Class 7 Creditors holding Allowed
Unsecured Claims shall also be made from the Litigation Trust.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Plan dated November 01,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3H5Fat1 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Proposed Attorney for the Debtor:
   
     Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
     Eric A. Liepins, P.C.
     12770 Coit Road, Suite 1100
     Dallas, TX 75251
     Telephone: (972) 991-5591
     Facsimile: (972) 991-5788
     Email: eric@ealpc.com

                     About Miken Oil Inc.

Miken Oil, Inc.'s business consists of the ownership and operation
of an oil services company.  It sought protection under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 21-60115) on
March 26, 2021. In the petition signed by Mike Tate, president, the
Debtor disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  Eric A. Liepins, Esq., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


MIND TECHNOLOGY: Hikes 9.00% Series A Preferred Stock Exchange Cap
------------------------------------------------------------------
MIND Technology, Inc. filed a Third Certificate of Amendment of
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of 9.00% Series
A Cumulative Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State of the
State of Delaware to increase the Exchange Cap, as defined in the
Certificate of Designations, to 49,851,150 shares of common stock,
such Exchange Cap representing a cap of 25 shares of common stock
per authorized share of the Company's authorized 9.00% Series A
Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, with the
rights, preferences, privileges, qualifications, restrictions and
limitations set forth in the Certificate of Designations filed as
Exhibit 3.5 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with
the SEC on Aug. 7, 2020, as amended by the Second Certificate of
Amendment to the Certificate of Designations filed as Exhibit 3.5
to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-260486) filed with the SEC on Oct. 25, 2021.

                       About Mind Technology

Mind Technology, Inc. -- http://mind-technology.com-- provides
technology and solutions for exploration, survey and defense
applications in oceanographic, hydrographic, defense, seismic and
security industries.  Headquartered in The Woodlands, Texas, MIND
Technology has a global presence with key operating locations in
the United States, Singapore, Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Its
Klein and Seamap units design, manufacture and sell specialized,
high performance sonar and seismic equipment.

Mind Technology reported a net loss of $20.31 million for the year
ended Jan. 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $11.29 million for
the year ended Jan. 31, 2020.  As of April 30, 2021, the Company
had $35.52 million in total assets, $8.95 million in total
liabilities, and $26.57 million in total stockholders' equity.

Houston, Texas-based Moss Adams LLP, the Company's auditor since
2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 16, 2021, citing that "The Company has a history of losses
and has had negative cash flows from operating activities in the
last two years.  The Company may not have access to sources of
capital that were available in prior periods.  In addition, the
COVID-19 pandemic and the decline in oil prices during fiscal 2021
caused a disruption to the Company's business and delays in some
orders.  Currently management's forecasts and related assumptions
support their assertion that they have the ability to meet their
obligations as they become due through the management of
expenditures and, if necessary, accessing additional funding from
the at-the-market program or other equity financing.  Should there
be constraints on the ability to access capital under the
at-the-market program or other equity financing, the Company has
asserted that it can manage cash outflows to meet the obligations
through reductions in capital expenditures and other operating
expenditures."


MKS GROUP: Eggspectation Franchisee Seeks Chapter 11
----------------------------------------------------
Jack Jacobs of Richmond BizSense reports that the local franchise
of Eggspectation, a Maryland-based breakfast chain, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, a little more than a year after
it opened at the south Richmond mall.

The filing was spurred by a dispute between the local franchisee
and Eggspectation's franchisor company, though it's unclear exactly
where the two parties don't see eye to eye.  The local franchise
entity is MKS Group LLC.

"We have certain disagreements with our franchisor but we hope to
resolve them in a business-like manner in the near future," John
Barrett of Virginia Beach-based Allegiant Law, who's representing
MKS, said in an email Thursday, November 4, 2021.

The bankruptcy filing lists a disputed debt owed to the franchisor
of $65,000.

Chapter 11 allows a company to remain in business and keep
creditors at bay while reorganizing its finances.

Barrett said the Stony Point Eggspectation location continues to
operate as usual as it seeks to reorganize.

"We are open for business right now and will continue to operate
into the future," he said.

Barrett said the plan is to try to settle the matter without the
need for a court decision.

The Chapter 11 filing lists MKS as having an estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and an estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in
liabilities. It is managed by Vishal Patel, who is also its CEO.

The Eggspectation chain launched in Canada in 1993. It has more
than a dozen locations in Canada as well as a Middle East presence.
Most of its seven U.S. locations are in the D.C. area, with an
eighth U.S. location to open in Maryland, per the company website.

The Stony Point location opened about a year ago. The mall was
recently listed for sale.

                         About MKS Group

MKS Group, LLC, a franchisee of Maryland-based breakfast chain
Eggspectation, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case
No. 21-33288) on November 2, 2021. In the petition signed by Vishal
Patel as manager & CEO, MKS Group LLC estimated assets of between
$1 million and $10 million and estimated liabilities of between
$100,000 and $500,000. John M. Barrett, Esq., of ALLEGIANT LAW,
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


NASHEF LLC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 18
---------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts
authorized Nashef LLC to continue using cash collateral through
November 18, 2021, the date of the next cash collateral hearing.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral on the same terms
and conditions as set forth in the Tenth Order Authorizing the Use
of Cash Collateral through the hearing date.

The November 18 hearing will be conducted by telephone at 1:30
p.m.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor
was permitted to use cash collateral during the specified period,
pursuant to the budget, or as expressly agreed to in writing by the
Secured Parties and the U.S. Trustee.

Hometown Bank; Harvard Funding LLC; the Internal Revenue Service;
the Massachusetts Department of Unemployment Assistance; and the
Massachusetts Department of Revenue are granted a continuing
postpetition replacement lien and security interest in all
postpetition property of the estate, of the same type against which
they held validly perfected liens and security interest as of the
Petition Date.  The Replacement Liens will maintain the same
priority, validity and enforceability as the liens on the
Collateral, and will be recognized to the extent of any diminution
in the value of the collateral resulting from the use of cash
collateral pursuant to the Tenth Order.

A copy of the Order is available for free at https://bit.ly/3mXi3J7
from PacerMonitor.com.

                         About Nashef LLC

Nashef LLC, a privately held company in Fitchburg, Massaschusetts.
Nashef LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 20-40199) on Feb. 6, 2020. In the
petition signed by Eyad Nashef, manager, the Debtor disclosed $170
in assets and $1,559,000 in liabilities.

Judge Christopher J. Panos oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by James P. Ehrhard, Esq. at Ehrhard &
Associates, P.C.



NATURE COAST: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru March 2022
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida,
Jacksonville Division, has authorized Nature Coast Emergency
Medical Foundation, Inc. to use cash collateral on an interim basis
through March 31, 2021, and provide adequate protection to entities
that may have an interest.

The Debtor is permitted to continue to use Cash Collateral
retroactively to the Petition Date going forward to pay: (i)
amounts expressly authorized by the Court, including payments to
the United States Trustee for quarterly fees; (ii) the current and
necessary expenses set forth in the Budget; and, (iii) that a
variance of expense line items of up to 10% per month and
cumulatively per month of up to 10% be permitted without the need
for further order of the Court.

SouthState Bank and Citrus County, Florida, may approve a variance
of more than 10% without further order of the Court.

As adequate protection of SouthState and Citrus' respective
interests in the Cash Collateral, they are granted a replacement
lien in any Cash Collateral acquired by the Debtors subsequent to
the Petition Date, to the same extent, priority and validity of
their respective liens in such Cash Collateral as of the Petition
Date, without the need to file or execute any document as may
otherwise be required under applicable non-bankruptcy law.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3q9kyda from
PacerMonitor.com.

       About Nature Coast Emergency Medical Foundation, Inc.

Nature Coast Emergency Medical Foundation, Inc.
--https://naturecoastems.org/ -- is Citrus County's exclusive,
not-for-profit (501(c)3), Advanced Life Support 9-1-1 emergency
responder and medical transportation provider.  The organization
was established on Oct. 1, 2000. It sought protection under Chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 21-02357)
on October 2, 2021. In the petition signed by Mary Hedges,
president, the Debtor disclosed $7,016,218 in total assets and
$4,730,723 in total liabilities.

Judge Roberta A. Colton oversees the case.

David S. Jennis, Esq., at David Jennis, PA d/b/a Jennis Morse
Etlinger is the Debtor's counsel.



NEP/NCP HOLDCO: Moody's Rates New $210MM 1st Lien Loan Add-on 'B3'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 rating to NEP/NCP Holdco,
Inc.'s (NEP) proposed $210 million add-on issuance to its senior
secured first lien term loan due 2025. NEP's existing ratings,
including the B3 corporate family rating, and stable outlook are
unchanged. NEP plans to use the proceeds from the add-on term loan
to repay all of the outstanding revolver balance, fund the
previously announced Bright Group acquisition (around $36 million)
and pay transaction fees and expenses.

Moody's views the add-on issuance as credit positive because it
will improve the company's liquidity without meaningfully
increasing its leverage or interest expense. Approximately $164
million of the $210 million add-on (nearly 80% of the proceeds)
will be used to repay the revolver borrowing. Thus, incremental net
debt to the balance sheet will be small relative to roughly $2
billion of debt currently outstanding.

Assignments:

Issuer: NEP/NCP Holdco, Inc

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned B3 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

NEP's B3 CFR reflects the company's highly levered capital
structure and highly capital-intensive business model that
restrains free cash flow. The company has a moderately aggressive
acquisition strategy which may prevent sustained deleveraging.
Moody's expects NEP's adjusted Debt/EBITDA to be high, in the 6x -
6.5x range over the next 12-18 months, despite earnings growth. The
capital intensity of NEP's business combined with significant
interest expense leaves it with limited, and historically negative,
free cash flows and weak interest coverage. Given the sponsor
ownership, the potential for future leveraging events are high, and
this further constrains the rating. Nevertheless, NEP's ratings are
supported by its strong global position in the niche video
production industry and a diversified blue-chip customer base with
long-standing relationships and low customer concentration. NEP's
fleet of mobile broadcast trucks and engineering expertise provide
for a strong value proposition to its customers and lends tangible
asset value, supporting the rating. Furthermore, NEP facilitates
the viewing of live events, a service Moody's considers key to
content producers and content distributors. This positions the
company well regardless of how the consumption and delivery of
media evolves and therefore supports sustainability of earnings.

Following the proposed term loan add-on issuance, Moody's expect
NEP to maintain good liquidity over the next 12-18 months. The
proposed add-on issuance will enable the company to pay off the
revolver balance in full and will meaningfully reduce reliance on
the revolver over the coming year. Proforma for the incremental
term loan issuance, NEP will have full availability on its $250
revolver due October 2023 and balance sheet cash of about $31
million. Moody's expects that NEP may use revolver borrowing
periodically to bridge the timing of its quarterly cash flows, but
will maintain comfortable availability over the next 12-18 months.

Moody's anticipates that NEP's earnings growth will lead to free
cash flows of around $20 million in the coming year, a notable
improvement after years of negative free cash flows. NEP
voluntarily exited its bank covenant waiver ahead of expiration.
Moody's anticipates that NEP will maintain adequate cushion under
its net debt financial covenant requirement over the next 12-18
months.

The B3 instrument ratings on the first lien credit facility
(revolver, US term loans, including the proposed add-on, and Euro
term loan) reflects the probability of default of the company as
reflected in its B3-PD probability of default rating, an average
expected family recovery rate of 50%, and the instrument' ranking
in the capital structure. The credit facility's B3 rating reflects
its larger relative size and senior position ahead of the second
lien term loan and other unsecured claims including payables and
leases.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectations for organic
earnings growth in high single digit percent range and smooth
integration of recent acquisitions. It also reflects Moody's
expectation that NEP will maintain good liquidity and will
proactively address the October 2023 revolver maturity. The stable
outlook incorporates tolerance for continued tuck-in acquisitions
or continued high capex spend in line with the historic pattern,
provided these are managed in a credit friendly manner.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATING

A downgrade could occur if NEP's EBITDA growth does not keep pace
with incremental debt raises, liquidity deteriorates, or if
financial policies become more aggressive. Negative free cash flows
and Moody's adjusted Debt/EBITDA above 7.5x may result in a
downgrade.

An upgrade would require profitable growth leading to free cash
flow-to-debt sustained in the mid-single digit percentages and
Debt/EBITDA sustained below 6x (both Moody's adjusted).

Maintaining good liquidity and committing to a more balanced
financial policy will also be needed for an upgrade.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Based in Pittsburgh, PA, NEP/NCP Holdco, Inc provides outsourced
media services necessary for the delivery of live broadcast of
sports and entertainment events to television and cable networks,
television content providers, and sports and entertainment
producers. The company is owned primarily by affiliates of the
Carlyle Group.


NEP/NCP HOLDCO: S&P Rates New $210MM Incremental Term Loan 'B'
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' rating to NEP/NCP Holdco Inc.'s
proposed $210 million incremental term loan. S&P expects NEP to use
the net proceeds to fund its acquisition of the Bright Group, pay
down the outstanding balance on its revolving credit facility, and
for general corporate purposes. S&P views the transaction to be
largely leverage neutral while improving the company's liquidity
availability.

S&P's 'B-/Stable' issuer credit rating and outlook reflects its
view that adjusted leverage will decline to the mid-6.0x area by
the end of 2022 driven by the recovery of live events globally and
the company's continued organic growth.

Issue Ratings - Recovery Analysis

Key analytical factors

-- S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a default in 2023
due to increased industry competition in the mobile broadcast TV
business, operational execution challenges, loss of TV network
clients, or an increase in capital spending needed to keep up with
technological innovations.

-- S&P said, "In a default scenario, we believe the company's
lenders would aim to maximize recoveries and pursue reorganization
instead of liquidation. Although the company's revenue and EBITDA
could decline, we believe the market for its services would
continue. We also believe the company's competitive position in
many of its markets would maintain value during bankruptcy
proceedings."

-- S&P's analysis incorporates the presence of a collateral
allocation mechanism between the company's European first-lien term
loan and its U.S. first-lien credit facility.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Simulated year of default: 2023
-- EBITDA at emergence: $287 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 6x
-- The revolving credit facility is 85% drawn at default
-- Obligor/nonobligor split: 50%/33%/17%

Simplified waterfall

-- Net emergence enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs):
About $1.64 billion

-- First-lien debt claims: $2.24 billion

    --Recovery expectation: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 70%)

-- Second-lien debt claims: $251 million

    --Recovery expectation: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 5%)

All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.



NEUTRAL POSTURE: Wins Cash Collateral Access
--------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Victoria Division, has authorized Neutral Posture, Inc. to use cash
collateral on an interim basis in accordance with the budget.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to pay operating
expenses and obtain goods, services, or equipment needed to carry
on its business.

The Debtor says substantially all of one or more of the Debtor's
assets appear to be subject to the pre-petition liens of Chase
Bank, including liens on Cash Collateral.  However, this is subject
to the Debtor's investigation of lien perfection and claims and the
Debtor's position that the cash it held as of the Petition Date is
not perfected.

Authority to use Cash Collateral under will terminate on the
earlier of (a) the effective date of a confirmed plan of
reorganization, (b) the expiration of the time period reflected in
the Interim Budget, (c) any default by the Debtor in any provision
of the Order or the budget, (d) an order dismissing this bankruptcy
case or converting the case to a case under chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code, or (e) the failure of the Debtor to maintain
insurance in such amounts and against such risks as are customarily
maintained by companies engaged in the same or similar businesses.


As adequate protection to the extent of any diminution in value of
Chase's collateral, Chase is granted, from and after the Petition
Date, a security interest in the Debtor's postpetition assets with
the same nature, extent, priority, and validity as the pre-petition
security interests held by Chase.

As additional adequate protection to the extent of any diminution
in value of Chase’s collateral, Chase is granted, from and after
the Petition Date, replacement liens and security interests in all
assets of the Debtor, including cash, accounts, accounts
receivable, equipment, general intangibles, chattel paper,
furniture, fixtures, and inventory acquired by the Debtor after the
Petition Date.

As additional adequate protection to the extent of any diminution
in value of Chase's collateral, Chase is granted a superpriority
administrative expense claim, which will have priority under
sections 503(b) and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The forms of adequate protection will be subordinate only to (i)
all accrued and unpaid fees and expenses incurred by the Debtor's
professionals and allowed by the Court in an amount not to exceed
the amounts set forth in the budget, (ii) statutory U.S. Trustee or
Court fees, and (iii) all reasonable fees and expenses up to
$10,000 incurred by the Subchapter V Trustee appointed in the case.


A final hearing on the matter is scheduled for December 1 at 10
a.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's November 2021 budget is
available at https://bit.ly/3BNH7Gp from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $200,500 in gross profit and $835,575 in total
expenses for the month.

                    About Neutral Posture, Inc.

Neutral Posture, Inc. is involved in the business of manufacturing
of ergonomic chairs and related items for the office. The Debtor
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 21-60086) on November 1, 2021. In the
petition signed by Rebecca E. Boenigk, president and chief
executive officer, the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Christopher Lopez oversees the case.

Tom A. Howley, Esq., at Howley Law, PLLC is the Debtor's counsel.



NEW HOPE: S&P Places 2016B Bonds 'B' Rating on Watch Negative
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed the following ratings on CreditWatch with
negative implications:

-- New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., Texas'
series 2017A-1 and A-2 (class I) bonds, rated 'B+'; series 2017B
(class II) bonds, rated 'B'; and series 2017C (class III, $2.7
million outstanding) rated 'B-', issued for 4-K Housing Inc.
(Stoney Brook Project); and

--New Hope Cultural Education Finance Corp., Texas' series 2016A
bonds, rated 'BB-'; series 2016B bonds, rated 'B'; and series 2016C
bonds, rated 'B-', issued for Cardinal Bay Inc. (Village on the
Park/Carriage Inn Project).

"The negative CreditWatch placements of these projects reflects S&P
Global Ratings' inability to obtain information from TEC regarding
its management policies, cash flow, and ability and willingness to
pay upcoming debt service payments on Jan. 1, 2022," said S&P
Global Ratings credit analyst Raymond Kim. S&P Global Ratings
requires timely information of satisfactory quality to maintain its
ratings in accordance with its policies. S&P views TEC's lack of
timely and sufficient information as an elevated governance risk
within our environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, due
to our view of the borrower's weak transparency practices.

S&P said, "Our ratings on Bexar County Housing Finance Corp.,
Texas' series 2011A (class I) senior housing revenue bonds and
series 2011B subordinate (class II) bonds, issued for Canton II
Inc. (Inn at Los Patios apartments project), another project
affiliated with TEC, remain at 'CCC' and on CreditWatch with
negative implications. We placed those ratings on CreditWatch with
negative implications on Oct. 29, 2021, due to management's failure
to properly fund its debt service accounts. "

Failure to receive the requested information from TEC regarding 4-K
Housing, Cardinal Bay, and Canton II within 30 days will likely
result in our withdrawal of the ratings.



NOISE SOLUTIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Noise Solutions [USA], Inc.
        420 Vine Avenue
        Sharon, PA 16146

Business Description: Noise Solutions [USA], Inc. is a provider of
                      engineered industrial noise suppression for
                      the energy sector.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Pennsylvania

Case No.: 21-10616

Debtor's Counsel: Donald R. Calaiaro, Esq.
                  CALAIARO VALENCIK
                  938 Penn Avenue, 5th Fl.
                  Suite 501
                  Pittsburgh, PA 15222
                  Tel: 412-232-0930
                  Fax: 412-232-3858
                  E-mail: dcalaiaro@c-vlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Scott K. MacDonald as president/CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/HULMISQ/Noise_Solutions_USA_Inc__pawbke-21-10616__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


NORCROSS LODGING: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 10
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Indiana,
Indianapolis Division, has authorized Norcross Lodging Associates,
LLP to use cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance with
the budget, with a 10% variance.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to prevent the
immediate and irreparable harm to the Debtor, its property, and the
property of the bankruptcy estate that would otherwise result if
the Debtor was prevented from obtaining such relief.

The Debtor executed a Replacement Promissory Note, with an
effective date of October 1, 2014, in the original principal amount
of $1,500,000, in favor of The National Republic Bank of Chicago,
and the Debtor executed a Deed to Secure Debt, Security Agreement
and Assignment of Rents, Assignment of Rents and Leases, and other
documents pertaining to the loan evidenced by the Note.

SG Peachtree Comers Hospitality Holdings, LLC asserts that it is
the holder of the Loan Documents.

The Debtor performed a preliminary investigation and analysis of
the Loan Documents and the related UCC filings and based upon the
preliminary investigation believes that PCH holds valid,
enforceable, and non-avoidable liens, and security interests in all
of the property owned by the Debtor, including among other things,
the Hotel, real property on which the Hotel is located, rents,
revenues, income, escrows, receipts, accounts, issues, and
profits.

Further, the Debtor's cash and cash equivalents (cash and accounts
receivable) and all proceeds thereof securing the Debtor's
obligations to PCH, among other things, constitute cash collateral.
PCH asserts that it has a valid, enforceable, non-avoidable, first
priority perfected security interest in the Cash Collateral. The
Debtor does not dispute this assertion, but reserves the right to
investigate and object if appropriate.

PCH asserts that the balance of the indebtedness owed to PCH by the
Debtor under the Loan Documents as of the Petition Date is
approximately $1,393,117.31 in principal and accrued interest. The
Debtor does not dispute this assertion, but reserves the right to
investigate and object if appropriate.

In addition to PCH, the U.S. Small Business Administration may
assert a security interest in the Debtor's Cash Collateral.

The Debtor has agreed to provide adequate protection to PCI I and
the SBA:

     a. The Debtor will maintain the combined value of cash on hand
or on deposit in the amount of $24,265,94 during the period of
interim cash use, which is the cumulative value of said Cash
Collateral as of the Petition Date;

     b. PCH and the SBA assert security interests in the property
that constitutes Cash Collateral, and PCH and/or the SBA may be
properly perfected. It is also possible that the Debtor has a basis
to challenge the interests asserted by PCH and/or the SBA.
Accordingly, until such time as the parties agree or the Court
determines the relative rights of PCH and the SBA in the Cash
Collateral, the Debtor will grant PCH and the SBA replacement liens
in cash collateral of the Debtor in the total aggregate amount of
$24,265.94 to the same extent and priority as their properly
perfected, prepetition security interests;

     c. During the period of interim cash use, the Debtor will only
use Cash Collateral consistent with the Budget for the operation,
maintenance, and preservation of the Hotel and the Debtor's
personal property; and

     d. The Debtor will maintain the insurance currently in place
on the Hotel and the Debtor's personal property.

The Debtor has further agreed to provide additional adequate
protection to PCH as follows: on the 15lh of each month (or the
next business day thereafter) during the period of interim cash
use, the Debtor will make a payment to PCH in the amount of
S4.600.00, provided that such payment does not cause the amount of
the Debtor's cash on hand or on deposit to fall below $24,265,94.
If any proposed PCH Adequate Protection Payment does cause the
amount of the Debtor's cash on hand or on deposit to fall below
$24,265,94, then the Debtor will immediately issue payment to PCH
with any cash above S24,265.94 and will pay any deficiency (i.e.,
the difference between $4,600 and the amount paid by the Debtor) at
the next scheduled date for payment of a PCH Adequate Protection
Payment in addition to the next PCH Adequate Protection Payment.

The replacement liens granted to PCH and the SBA will be valid,
enforceable, and properly perfected to the same extent and priority
as the prepetition liens of PCH and the SBA in the same property.

The Debtor's authorization to use Cash Collateral will immediately
terminate on the earlier to occur of: (a) the date on which PCH
provides, via facsimile and electronic mail, written notice to the
Debtor's counsel of the occurrence of an Event of Default and the
expiration of a three business day cure period, if such default can
be cured; and (b) 11:59 p.m. on December 10, 2021, unless otherwise
agreed by PCH and the Debtor in writing.

The final hearing on the matter is scheduled for December 8 at 10
a.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's 14-week budget through January
30, 2022 is available at https://bit.ly/3bJH3gk from
PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provided for $191,718 in total revenue and $102,540 in
total expenses for the period.

              About Norcross Lodging Associates, LLP
                    dba Norcross Inn & Suites

Norcross Lodging Associates, LLP owns and operates an unflagged,
suburban hotel known as the Norcross Inn & Suites, built in 1989 on
two acres of land in Peachtree Corners, Gwinnett County, Georgia.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 21-04856-JJG-11) on
October 27, 2021. In the petition signed by Mohan P. Hari, managing
partner, the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.

Judge Jeffrey J. Graham oversees the case.

Andrew Kight, Esq., at Jacobson Hile Kight LLC is the Debtor's
counsel.



PATH MEDICAL: Committee Taps Greenberg Traurig as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Path Medical
Center Holdings, Inc. and Path Medical, LLC seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to
employ Greenberg Traurig, P.A. as legal counsel.

The firm's services include:

   (a) advising the committee with respect to its rights, duties
and powers in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases;

   (b) assisting the committee in its consultations with the
Debtors relative to the administration of the cases;

   (c) assisting with the committee's investigation of the acts,
conduct, assets, liabilities and financial condition of the Debtors
and of the operation of the Debtors' business and any other matters
relevant to the cases;

   (d) assisting the committee in its analysis of and negotiations
with the Debtors or any third-party concerning matters related to,
among other things, the terms of a sale, plan of reorganization or
liquidation, or other conclusion of the cases;

   (e) assisting the committee in requesting the appointment of a
trustee or examiner, should such action become necessary;

   (f) assisting the committee as to its communications to the
general creditor body regarding significant matters in the cases;

   (g) representing the committee at all hearings and other
proceedings;

   (h) reviewing and analyzing all applications, orders, statements
of operations and bankruptcy schedules filed with the court and
advising the committee as to their propriety;

   (i) assisting the committee in preparing legal papers; and

   (j) performing other necessary legal services.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     John Hutton                 $925 per hour
     Ari Newman                  $750 per hour
     Associates/paralegals       $200 to $650 per hour

Greenberg Traurig will also be reimbursed for out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

John Hutton, Esq., a partner at Greenberg Traurig, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     John Hutton, Esq.
     Greenberg Traurig, P.A.
     333 S.E. 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400
     Miami, FL 33131
     Office: (305) 579-0500
     Direct: (305) 579-0788
     Email: huttonj@gtlaw.com

                        About Path Medical

Path Medical Center Holdings, Inc. and Path Medical, LLC filed
their voluntary petitions for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Lead Case No. 21-18339) on Aug. 28, 2021.  Manual Fernandez,
chief executive officer, signed the petitions.  

At the time of filing, Path Medical Center listed $220,060 in
assets and $76,988,419 in liabilities while Path Medical listed
$30,047,477 in assets and $86,494,715 in liabilities.

Judge Scott M. Grossman oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Edelboim Lieberman Revah Oshinsky PLLC as
bankruptcy counsel, Foley & Lardner, LLP as special counsel, and
Davis Goldman, PLLC as litigation counsel.  KapilaMukamal, LLP,
Keefe McCullough Co, LLP CPAs and SSG Advisors, LLC serve as the
Debtors' financial advisor, ESOP auditor and investment banker,
respectively.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases on Sept. 28,
2021.  Greenberg Traurig, P.A. and Province, LLC serve as the
committee's legal counsel and financial advisor, respectively.


PECF USS III: Revised Financing No Impact on Moody's B3 CFR
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service said PECF USS Intermediate Holding III
Corporation's (dba "United Site Services" or "USS") announced plan
to cancel its previously-announced $550 million senior secured
notes due 2028, reduce its proposed senior unsecured notes due 2029
by $200 million to $550 million from $750 million and upsize the
proposed senior secured term loan due 2028 by $750 million,
increasing it to $2.0 billion from $1.25 billion, increases the
proportion of the secured debt relative to total debt, thereby
putting downward pressure on the senior secured rating. However,
since the change to the debt capital structure is leverage neutral,
the ratings, including the B3 corporate family rating ("CFR"),
B3-PD probability of default rating ("PDR"), B2 rating on the
upsized $2.1 billion first lien credit facility (including $100
million revolving credit facility) and Caa2 rating on the downsized
$550 million eight-year senior unsecured notes, as well as the
stable outlook, are unchanged at this time. The B2 rating assigned
to the cancelled secured notes will be withdrawn.

Headquartered in Westborough, MA and controlled by affiliates of
Platinum Equity, LLC, USS is a provider of portable sanitation
units, temporary fencing, storage containers and temporary electric
equipment serving the construction, commercial and industrial,
special event, government agency and other end markets. The company
generated revenue of around $1.0 billion for the 12 months ended
June 30, 2021.


PLAYA HOTELS: Incurs $12.4 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $12.37 million on $151.29 million of total revenue for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2021, compared to a net loss of $78.60
million on $28.74 million of total revenue for the three months
ended Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $89.88 million on $357.84 million of total revenue
compared to a net loss of $188.62 million on $206.95 million of
total revenue for the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $2.02 billion in total
assets, $1.39 billion in total liabilities, and $623.95 million in
total shareholders' equity.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company held $231.5 million in cash and
cash equivalents, excluding $24.6 million of restricted cash.
Total interest-bearing debt was $1,147.7 million, comprised of the
Company's Senior Secured Term Loan due 2024 and Property Loan due
2025.  Effective March 29, 2018, the Company entered into two
interest rate swaps to fix LIBOR at 2.85% on $800.0 million of its
variable rate Term Loan.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, there was no
balance outstanding on the Company's $85.0 million Revolving Credit
Facility.

Management Commentary

Bruce D. Wardinski, chairman and CEO of Playa Hotels & Resorts,
commented, "Continued robust demand and our focus on providing
best-in-class service led to an acceleration in average daily rate
growth during the third quarter.  Importantly, we maintained our
expense discipline, allowing the rate gains to flow through nicely
to the bottom line despite higher expense inflation.  Our booked
position for the fourth quarter and the high season, combined with
expected increases in flight capacity into our destinations, bode
well for the sustainability of our pricing gains in the coming
months.

The fundamental improvement in the third quarter was broad based,
with each of our segments seeing sequential improvement in
occupancy and absolute Net Package ADR.  Our Net Package ADR gains
resulted in Owned Resort EBITDA Margins nearing or exceeding
historical third quarter margins at significantly lower occupancy
levels in each of our segments.  Using our results in Mexico as a
proxy of our profit potential as flight capacity continues to ramp,
I am optimistic for the next leg of the recovery in our Caribbean
markets.

Looking ahead, booking momentum has accelerated thus far in the
fourth quarter.  As of mid-October, our revenue on the books for
the fourth quarter of 2021 is nearly 25% above fourth quarter 2019
levels for our owned and managed resorts, with ADRs driving nearly
all of the gains.  Our first quarter 2022 revenue on the books is
approximately 40% above first quarter 2020 levels at the same point
in time in the fourth quarter of 2019 for our owned and managed
resorts, with ADRs driving approximately half of the gains and
continuing to build."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1692412/000169241221000092/plya-20210930.htm

                    About Playa Hotels & Resorts

Playa Hotels & Resorts is an owner, operator and developer of
all-inclusive resorts in prime beachfront locations in popular
vacation destinations in Mexico and the Caribbean.  As of Sept. 30,
2021, Playa owned and/or managed a total portfolio consisting of 22
resorts (8,366 rooms) located in Mexico, Jamaica, and the Dominican
Republic.  In Mexico, Playa owns and manages Hyatt Zilara Cancun,
Hyatt Ziva Cancun, Panama Jack Resorts Cancun, Panama Jack Resorts
Playa del Carmen, Hilton Playa del Carmen All-Inclusive Resort,
Hyatt Ziva Puerto Vallarta, and Hyatt Ziva Los Cabos.  In Jamaica,
Playa owns and manages Hyatt Zilara Rose Hall, Hyatt Ziva Rose
Hall, Hilton Rose Hall Resort & Spa, Jewel Grande Montego Bay
Resort & Spa and Jewel Paradise Cove Beach Resort & Spa.  In the
Dominican Republic, Playa owns and manages the Hilton La Romana
All-Inclusive Family Resort, the Hilton La Romana All-Inclusive
Adult Resort, Hyatt Zilara Cap Cana and Hyatt Ziva Cap Cana.  Playa
owns two resorts in the Dominican Republic that are managed by a
third-party and manages five resorts on behalf of third-party
owners.

Playa reported a net loss of $262.37 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $4.36 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019.

                            *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 21, 2021, S&P Global Ratings
revised its outlook on Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. to positive from
negative and affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating.  At the same
time, S&P affirmed its 'CCC+' issue-level rating on the company's
secured debt.  S&P said, "The positive outlook reflects our
expectation that Playa will maintain adequate liquidity.  In
addition, it indicates that we could raise our rating on the
company if the significant recent improvement in travel volumes to
Mexico and the Caribbean is sustained and its package average daily
rates (ADRs), which are currently significantly elevated relative
to 2019 levels, do not moderate materially.  Specifically, we could
raise our rating if Playa increases its revenue and EBITDA such
that it sustains EBITDA coverage of interest expense of more than
1.5x, which would indicate it is able to sustain its capital
structure over the long term."


PWM PROPERTY: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Dec 3
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware has
authorized PWM Property Management LLC and affiliates to, among
other things, use cash collateral on an interim basis and provide
adequate protection.

The Debtors have an immediate need to use Cash Collateral to, among
other things, fund the orderly continuation of their respective
business, maintain the confidence of their respective customers and
vendors, pay their respective operating expenses, and preserve
their respective going-concern value, consistent with their
respective Interim Budget.

The "Park Avenue Cash Collateral" will be deemed to include,
without limitation, all of the "cash collateral" of Debtor 245 Park
Avenue Property LLC as Park Avenue Owner, within the meaning of
section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, in which Wilmington Trust,
National Association -- as Trustee for the holders of 245 Park
Avenue Trust 2017-245P, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2017-245P, on behalf of itself and the holders
of the related "Companion Loans" (in that capacity, the Prepetition
Park Avenue Secured Party) -- has valid, perfected security
interest, liens, or mortgages, regardless of whether such security
interests, liens, or mortgages existed as of the Petition Date or
arise thereafter.

The "West Madison Cash Collateral" will be deemed to include,
without limitation, all of the "cash collateral" of the Debtor 181
West Madison Property LLC as West Madison Owner, within the meaning
of section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, in which Wells Fargo Bank,
National Association -- as Trustee for the holders of J.P. Morgan
Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2020-LOOP, Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2020-LOOP, on behalf of
itself and the holders of the related "Companion Loans" -- has
valid, perfected security interest, liens, or mortgages, regardless
of whether such security interests, liens, or mortgages existed as
of the Petition Date or arise thereafter.

Debtor 245 Park Avenue Property is authorized to use the Park
Avenue Cash Collateral in accordance with the Park Avenue Interim
Budget; and Debtor 181 West Madison Property is authorized to use
the West Madison Cash Collateral in accordance with the West
Madison Interim Budget, in each case during the period from the
Petition Date through and including the occurrence of the
Termination Date.

As adequate protection for the Park Avenue Owner's use of the Park
Avenue Cash Collateral, the Prepetition Park Avenue Secured Party
is granted, solely to the extent of the postpetition diminution in
value of the Prepetition Park Avenue Secured Party's interest in
the Park Avenue Cash Collateral resulting from the use, sale or
lease by the Park Avenue Owner of the Park Avenue Cash Collateral
and the imposition or enforcement of the automatic stay pursuant to
section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code:

     a. valid and perfected replacement security interests in and
liens upon the Park Avenue Owner's assets and properties; and

     b. a superpriority administrative claim against the Park
Avenue Owner’s estate, as and to the extent provided in section
507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.
  
As additional adequate protection of the Prepetition Park Avenue
Secured Party's respective interests:

     a. The Park Avenue Owner will maintain the going concern value
of the Prepetition Park Avenue Secured Party's collateral by using
the Park Avenue Cash Collateral only (i) to pay the ordinary,
reasonable, and necessary costs and expenses of owning, operating,
maintaining, preserving, and protecting 245 Park Avenue; (ii) to
pay the debt service (to the extent expressly provided for in the
Park Avenue Interim Budget) on, and to fund the reserves required
to be funded and the fees and ancillary expenses required to be
paid under or in connection with, and in accordance with the loan
documents for, the mortgage loan that is secured by 245 Park
Avenue, in each case, solely to the extent that such reserves,
fees, and ancillary expenses are expressly provided for in the Park
Avenue Interim Budget; and (iii) to administer the Park Avenue
Owner's chapter 11 case;

     b. The Park Avenue Owner will use the Park Avenue Cash
Collateral in accordance with the interim budget, with a 20%
variance.

     c. The Park Avenue Owner will provide the Park Avenue Servicer
with (i) an updated rolling 13-week cash flow forecast in respect
of the Park Avenue Owner.

As adequate protection for the West Madison Owner's use of the West
Madison Cash Collateral, the Prepetition West Madison Secured Party
is granted, solely to the extent of the postpetition diminution in
value of the Prepetition West Madison Secured Party's interest in
the West Madison Cash Collateral resulting from the use, sale or
lease by the West Madison Owner of the West Madison Cash
Collateral and the imposition or enforcement of the automatic stay
pursuant to section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code:

     a. valid and perfected replacement security interests in and
liens upon the West Madison Owner's assets and properties; and

     b. a superpriority administrative claim against the West
Madison Owner's estate.

The Park Avenue Owner's and the West Madison Owner's respective
rights to use Cash Collateral will terminate on the earlier to
occur of:

     (x) 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on December 3, 2021,
unless a Final Order or further Interim Order is entered extending
the Park Avenue Owner's and the West Madison Owner's respective
rights to use Cash Collateral; and

     (y) the date upon which the Court issues an order following
notice and a hearing providing for the termination of the further
use of Cash Collateral due to the failure by the Park Avenue Owner
or the West Madison Owner to comply with the materials terms,
covenants, and conditions of the Interim Order.

The Final Hearing on the Motion is scheduled for December 2 at 2
p.m.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3014dfm from
PacerMonitor.com.

                 About PWM Property Management

PWM Property Management LLC, et al., are primarily engaged in
renting and leasing real estate properties.  They own two premium
office buildings, namely 245 Park Avenue in New York City, a
prominent commercial real estate assets in Manhattan's prestigious
Park Avenue office corridor, and 181 West Madison Street in
Chicago, Illinois.

On Oct. 31, 2021, PWM Property Management LLC and its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
21-11445).  PWM estimated assets and liabilities of $1 billion to
$10 billion as of the bankruptcy filing.

The cases are pending before the Honorable Judge Mary F. Walrath
and are being jointly administered for procedural purposes under
Case No. 21-11445.

The Debtors tapped White & Case LLP as restructuring counsel; Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as local counsel; and M3 Advisory
Partners, LP as restructuring advisor.  Omni Agent Solutions is the
claims agent.



QUALITY REHABILITATION: Gets OK to Hire Shippen Pope as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality Rehabilitation Network, Inc. received approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to employ Shippen
Pope and Associates, PLLC as accountant.

The firm's services include:

   a. reviewing monthly accounting and making required
adjustments;

   b. preparing and filing the required monthly and quarterly tax
reporting forms; and

   c. preparing and filing the Debtor's federal and state income
tax returns due during the pendency of its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be paid at hourly rates ranging from $60 to $170 and
will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Alejandra Galvan, a partner at Shippen, disclosed in a court filing
that her firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Alejandra J. Galvan
     Shippen Pope and Associates, PLLC
     200 E 16th St. Suite 200
     Yuma, AZ 85364
     Tel: (928) 726-9470

               About Quality Rehabilitation Network

Yuma, Ariz.-based Quality Rehabilitation Network, Inc. filed a
petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
21-07539) on Oct. 6, 2021, listing up to $500,000 in assets and up
to $10 million in liabilities. Carl Malmquist, president, signed
the petition.   

Judge Brenda Moody Whinery oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Thomas H. Allen, Esq., at Allen Barnes & Jones,
PLC as legal counsel, and Shippen Pope and Associates, PLLC as
accountant.


R & R INDUSTRIES: Unsecureds to be Paid in Full in 60 Months
------------------------------------------------------------
R & R Industries, Inc., submitted an Amended Plan of Reorganization
under Subchapter V dated November 1, 2021.

R&R is a Florida S corporation which was incorporated in 1964. R&R
specializes in the installation of roofing, sheet metal and gutter
systems for commercial, industrial and residential properties, and
has been serving the Daytona Beach area for over 55 years.

There have been a variety of events occurring since the Petition
Date that effect the Debtor's ability to successfully reorganize,
including challenges that have been successfully resolved. For
example, at the time of the Petition Date, business pressures
resulting from the Pandemic heightened building material and supply
shortages, which in turn, created a cash flow crunch on the Debtor
as job schedules were slowed and, in some instances, halted.

The short-term challenge was worsened by the need for operating
cash to purchase supplies that were available. Accordingly, the
Debtor necessarily sought, and with Court approval, obtained, a
post-petition loan in the amount of $1 million, to fuel operations
and bridge the gap through the Pandemic and this reorganization.

A further positive development during this case was the acquisition
of a significant new project known as John Knox Village, in which
the Debtor was retained to repair extensive hail damage to a local
retirement community. The amount of the claim being repaired is in
excess of $10 million and the Debtor is expected to net in excess
of $1.5 million from this job. As result of ongoing and continuing
new business; the John Knox Village job; and the postpetition loan
to bridge the gap, the Debtor is confident about its ability to
fund the Plan, with all allowed claims to be paid at 100% of the
claim amounts.

The Plan will treat claims as follows:

     * Class 4 consists of the Secured Claim of the SBA for an
Economic Injury Disaster Loan. This Claim is secured by a lien on
all assets of the Debtor. The Class 3 Secured Claim is estimated as
of the Petition Date as being $499,900 and will be paid in full.
This Class is Unimpaired.

     * Class 5 consists of the Secured Claim of TVT Capital. This
claim is secured by accounts receivable of the Debtor, according to
the Proof of Claim filed by this creditor. The Debtor does not
concede that TVT Capital's claim is secured or that it should be
allowed, but for purposes of the Plan, the Class 5 claim is
estimated to be $316,500 and if allowed, it will be paid in full.
This Claim is Impaired.

     * Class 6 consists of consists of the Secured Claim of TVT 2.0
Capital. This claim is secured by accounts receivable of the
Debtor, according to the Proof of Claim filed by this creditor. The
Debtor does not concede that TVT Capital's claim is secured or that
it should be allowed, but for purposes of the Plan, the Class 6
claim is estimated to be $296,747 and if allowed, it will be paid
in full. This Claim is Impaired.

     * Class 7 consists of the Secured Claim of Ford Motor Credit.
This Claim is secured by a lien on the Debtor's 2019 Ford F250
truck. The Class 7 Secured Claim is estimated as of the Petition
Date at $40,000.00, less payments made pre-confirmation, and will
be paid in full on contract terms. This Class is Unimpaired.

     * Class 8 consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claims against the
Debtor, which are estimated to total $500,000, which will be paid
in full in 60 equal monthly installments beginning on the Effective
Date.

     * Class 11 consists of any and all membership interests and
warrants currently issued or authorized in the Debtor. This Class
is Unimpaired. Holders of a Class 11 interests shall retain their
full equity interest in the same amounts, percentages, manner and
structure as existed on the Petition Date.

The Plan contemplates that the Reorganized Debtor will continue to
operate the Debtor's business. Except as explicitly set forth in
this Plan, all cash in excess of operating expenses generated from
operation until the Effective Date will be used for Plan Payments
or Plan implementation, cash on hand as of Confirmation shall be
available for Administrative Expenses.

A full-text copy of the Amended Plan of Reorganization dated
November 01, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3GVLwuy from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Scott W. Spradley
     Law Offices of Scott W. Spradley, P.A.
     109 South 5th Street
     P.O. Box 1
     Flagler Beach, FL 32136
     Tel: 386/693-4935
     Fax: 386/693-4937
     E-mail: scott@flaglerbeachlaw.com

                        About R & R Industries

R & R Industries, a Florida S corporation formed in 1964,
specializes in the installation of roofing, heating, air
conditioning and ventilation systems for commercial, industrial and
residential properties.  Located at 500 Carswell Avenue, in Daytona
Beach, Florida, R&R has been serving the Daytona Beach area for
over 55 years.

The Debtor filed a petition under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.Fla. Case No. 01050) on March 11, 2021
in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida.

In the petition, Larry T. Beasley II, president, the Debtor
estimated between $1 million and $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Law Offices of Scott W. Spradley, P.A., is the
Debtor's attorney.  Judge Lori V. Vaughan oversees the case.


R. INVESTMENTS: Updates Unsecured Claims Pay Details; Amends Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
R. Investments, RLLP, submitted a Disclosure Statement in support
of Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor works to garner and maintain existing investor
relationships, identify potential real estate investment
opportunities in MDUs and the hotel industry, and to attract
capital to invest in real estate assets that meet acceptable
criteria set by Debtor.  Acquisition of an asset requires careful
planning to determine the necessary steps required to rehabilitate
and transform the assets into a stable investment property that
will generate high returns to equity investors. Substantially all
of Debtor's prepetition revenues are generated through the
acquisition fees and management fees of the MDUs and Hotels.

Acquisition fees, ranging from 1–2% of project cost, were not
charged by Debtor historically, but are now part of the business
model going forward. Acquisition fees will be paid as a part of
closing costs of the MDUs and Hotels. On January 7, 2021, Debtor
received a flat acquisition fee of $150,000.00 in connection with a
Hotel in Tampa, Florida. Furthermore, Debtor expects to collect a
monthly asset management fee, which will be approximately 3% of
projected monthly rent at stabilization (full occupancy of MDU).
Like the acquisition fee, monthly asset management fees were not
historically charged by Debtor.

Debtor also has a reasonable expectation to the Employee Retention
Tax Credit under the CARES Act, which was passed in 2020 to
encourage businesses to keep employees on payrolls. The refundable
tax credit is 50% of up to $10,000.00 in wages paid by an eligible
employer whose business has been financially impacted by COVID-19.
Debtor and Non-Debtor Affiliates collectively filed $794,961.25 in
tax credits, although that number has since been reduced to
$600,979 ($39,254 for Debtor and $561,724 for Non-Debtor
Affiliates) after their accountant made certain payroll
adjustments. To date, RC and RT have received $279,551 in tax
credits.

The Plan provides for the reorganization of Debtor's business and
affairs through the creation of RI-2 NewCo. The DS Secured Claim
shall be paid by the issuance of a promissory note by RI-2 NewCo
and which will be paid in full with 10% interest over three years.
DS's prepetition Liens against Debtor's Assets, existing as of the
Petition Date, shall be unaltered by the Plan. Each Holder of an
Allowed Unsecured Claim shall receive one Class A Unit in RI-2
NewCo in exchange for each $5,000.00 of their Allowed Unsecured
Claim carried through to the second decimal point. Holders of Class
A Units shall receive 125% of their Allowed Unsecured Claims until
paid in full.

For illustrative purposes only, a Holder of an Allowed Unsecured
Claim in the amount of $13,250.00 shall have 2.65 Class A Units in
RI-2 NewCo. Once that Holder of 2.65 Class A Units in RI-2 NewCo
receives periodic Distributions, totaling $16,562.50, such Holder
will be considered to be paid in full, and its Class A Units shall
be cancelled. Holders of Interests shall receive Class B Units in
RI-2 NewCo. Debtor anticipates that all creditors' Allowed Claims
will be paid in full under the terms of the Plan.

RI-2 NewCo shall own all of the membership interests in RI-2 SubCo.
RI-2 SubCo shall own: (a) all of Debtor's Prepetition Real Estate
Assets, free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and
interests, unless as expressly otherwise provided for in this Plan;
(b) all of the membership interests in any future special purpose
entities that acquire and own distressed real property consisting
of multifamily and/or hospitality ("Distressed Properties"); (c)
all of Debtors personal property; and (d) all of Steffens' and
Perrin's right, title, and interest in, and to, all of Non-Debtor
Affiliates. RI-2 SubCo may also own all of R Tek's owners' right,
title, and interest in, and to, R-Tek if (i) the Plan is confirmed
as substantially drafted, or (ii) Hale consents to such
consolidation if the Plan is not confirmed as substantially
drafted.

       Class 3 Allowed Unsecured Claims

On the Effective Date, each Holder of an Allowed Unsecured Claim
shall receive in exchange for their Unsecured Claim one non-voting
Class A unit in RI-2 NewCo for every $5,000.00 of their Allowed
Unsecured Claim carried through to the second decimal point (each a
"Class A Unit"). For illustrative purposes only, a Holder of an
Allowed Unsecured Claim in the amount of $13,250.00 shall have 2.65
Class A Units in RI-2 NewCo. Once that Holder of 2.65 Class A Units
in RI-2 NewCo receives periodic Distributions, as provide for in
the Plan, totaling $16,562.50, such Holder will be considered to be
paid in full, and its Class A Units shall be cancelled. RI-2 NewCo
shall make periodic distributions of 70% of operating cash flow,
which is revenue less operating expenses, which includes payment on
account of any post-Confirmation debts less scheduled or
discretionary payments made to DS ("Free Cash Flows") of RI-2
NewCo's business.

The remaining 30% of the Free Cash Flows of RI-2 NewCo's business
shall be distributed as compensation to RI-2 NewCo's management.
All Distributions provided under the Plan shall be distributable
pro rata to Holders of Class A Units until the Holder of such units
has received Distributions totaling 125% of such Holder's Allowed
Unsecured Claim. When a Holder of Class A Units has received
Distributions totaling 125% of their Allowed Unsecured Claim such
Class A Units shall be cancelled. No Distributions will be made to
Holders of Class A Units until the DS Secured Claim is paid in full
as provided for under this Plan. As additional treatment for
Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims, Debtor shall
distribute the proceeds of Avoidance Actions, net of expenses
including attorneys' fees and costs, pro rata among those Holders
of Class A Units if such proceeds are received.

On the Effective Date, Reorganized Debtor shall create RI-2 NewCo
and all Holders of Allowed Unsecured Claims shall automatically be
members of RI-2 NewCo, in accordance with the terms of the RI-2
NewCo Operating Agreement. The principle purpose of RI-2 NewCo
shall be to own all of the membership interests in RI-2 SubCo. RI-2
SubCo shall own: (a) all of Debtor's Prepetition Real Estate
Assets, free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and
interests, unless as expressly otherwise provided for in this Plan;
(b) all of the membership interests in any future special purpose
entities that acquire and own distressed real property consisting
of Distressed Properties; (c) all of Debtor's personal property;
and (d) all of Steffens' and Perrin's right, title, and interest
in, and to, all of Non Debtor Affiliates.

RI-2 SubCo may also own all of R Tek's owners' right, title, and
interest in, and to, R-Tek if (i) the Plan is confirmed as
substantially drafted, or (ii) Hale consents to such consolidation
if the Plan is not confirmed as substantially drafted. It is the
intent of Debtor to bring ownership of NonDebtor Affiliates under
the umbrella of Debtor. Copies of the RI-2 NewCo Operating
Agreement and RI-2 SubCo Operating Agreement.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 31,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3o6vbLk from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel for Debtor:

     MOYE WHITE LLP
     Timothy M. Swanson
     Patrick R. Akers
     1400 16th Street, 6th Floor
     Denver, Colorado 80202
     Tel: (303) 292-2900
     Fax: (303) 292-4510
     E-mail: tim.swanson@moyewhite.com
             patrick.akers@moyewhite.com

                     About R. Investments

R. Investments, RLLP sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 21-11011) on March 4,
2021. William Travis Steffens, chief executive officer, signed the
petition. At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to
have $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $10 million to $50
million in liabilities. Judge Elizabeth E. Brown oversees the case.
The Debtor tapped Moye White, LLP as bankruptcy counsel and the Law
Offices of Silver & Brown as special counsel.


R.R. DONNELLEY: Moody's Puts B2 CFR Under Review for Downgrade
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company's
("RRD") B2 corporate family rating, B2-PD probability of default
rating, B1 ratings on its senior secured term loan B and senior
secured notes, and B3 ratings on its senior unsecured notes and
debentures under review for downgrade. The outlook has changed to
rating under review from stable.

The review follows RRD's announcement[1] it has entered into a
definitive agreement to be acquired by Atlas Holdings LLC ("Atlas")
in an all-cash transaction with a total enterprise value of
approximately $2.1 billion.

"The review for downgrade was prompted by the possibility that
RRD's credit profile will weaken should the transaction close, as
well as the uncertainty around RRD's future capital structure and
credit metrics post-acquisition", said Aziz Al Sammarai, Moody's
Analyst.

On Review for Downgrade:

Issuer: R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company

Corporate Family Rating, Placed on Review for Downgrade, currently
B2

Probability of Default Rating, Placed on Review for Downgrade,
currently B2-PD

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Placed on Review for
Downgrade, currently B1 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Placed on Review for
Downgrade, currently B1 (LGD3)

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Placed on Review for
Downgrade, currently B3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company

Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Stable

Issuer: R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Remains Unchanged at SGL-2

RATINGS RATIONALE/ FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR
DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The review will focus on the amount of acquisition debt financing
taken to fund the transaction, post-closing credit metrics, RRD's
future capital structure, business and financial strategy under the
new ownership, and the company's ability to maintain good
liquidity. The review will also incorporate future governance
considerations for RRD as a private company. The change of
ownership would be a credit negative if Atlas decides to pursue a
more aggressive financial policy.

The transaction is expected to close in H1 of 2022 and remains
subject to customary closing conditions, including approval by
RRD's shareholders and receipt of regulatory approvals.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Media published
in June 2021.

Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, RRD is the leader in the North
American commercial printing industry. Revenue for the year ended
September 30, 2021 was $4.9 billion.


RONNY'S A-LA-CARTE: Amends Executory Contract Provisions
--------------------------------------------------------
Ronny's A-La-Carte, Inc., submitted the First Modification to Plan
of Reorganization.

Debtor modifies the Plan in accordance with §§ 1125 and 1127 of
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code. The changes do
not materially or adversely affect the rights of any parties in
interest which have not had notice and an opportunity to be heard
with regard thereto.

The Plan, and specifically Article 10, Section 10.1, Provisions
Regarding Executory Contracts, is amended to provide that:

     * Any unexpired leases or executory contracts which are not
assumed under the Plan or are the subject of a pending motion to
assume as of the Effective Date shall be deemed rejected pursuant
to Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code on the Effective Date. Under
the terms of the Plan, a proof of claim for damages arising from
such rejection must be filed in compliance with the Bankruptcy
Rules on or before sixty (60) days after the Confirmation Date. Any
claims which are not timely filed will be disallowed and
discharged.

     * Debtor will assume the following contracts on the Effective
Date of the Plan (each an "Assumed Contract" and collectively the
"Assumed Contracts"): Pillow Perfect, Inc.; Penske Truck Leasing
Co., L.P.; and CIT Technology Fin Serv Inc.

     * Debtor will also assume all executory contracts regarding
utility services and insurance.

Like in the prior iteration of the Plan, Debtor will pay Allowed
Unsecured Claims a pro-rata share of the following monthly
distributions commencing on the 28th day of the 1st month following
the Effective Date and continuing on the 28th day of each
subsequent month through and including the 36th month.

The source of funds for the payments pursuant to the Plan is
Debtor's operations or other income. Debtor will continue its
prepetition business and use this income to pay creditors under the
Plan.

A full-text copy of the First Modification to Plan of
Reorganization dated October 29, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/2YftAK0 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.  

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Nathan T. Juster, Esq.
     Jones & Walden, LLC
     699 Piedmont Avenue, NE
     Atlanta, GA 30308
     Tel: (404) 564-9300

                   About Ronny's A-La-Carte Inc.

Ronnys A-La-Carte, Inc., an Atlanta, Ga.-based merchant wholesaler
of grocery and related products, sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 21-55239) on July
13, 2021.  Ronny Shiflet, chief executive officer, signed the
petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets
of between $100,000 and $500,000 and liabilities of between $1
million and $10 million.  Judge Paul Baisier oversees the case.
Jones & Walden, LLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


RUBY PIPELINE: S&P Lowers ICR to 'CC' On Near-Term Default Risk
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on Ruby
Pipeline LLC to 'CC' from 'CCC' and its issue-level rating on the
company's senior unsecured notes to 'CCC-' from 'CCC+'. The '2'
recovery rating is unchanged, indicating its expectation for
substantial recovery (70%-90%; rounded estimate 85%) in the event
of a payment default.

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our expectation that we
view default to be a virtual certainty, unless Ruby receives
support from its indirect owners, KMI and PPL.

"We view default as a near-term certainty given Ruby's projected
liquidity position and unsustainable capital structure.

"Under our base-case scenario, we view Ruby's default as a virtual
certainty given the company's insufficient liquidity relative to
its approaching debt maturity, and its unsustainable capital
structure. In addition, we are not assuming further support from
the company's indirect owners.

"We expect Ruby will have a material liquidity deficit given the
$475 million outstanding due April 1, 2022, relative to its
liquidity's sources, which include S&P Global Ratings' forecast
funds from operations (FFO) of about $40 million over the next six
months and cash on the balance sheet of about $52 million as of
June. 30, 2021.

"In addition, we view refinancing for the full amount as unlikely
given Ruby's unsustainable capital structure. Similar to our
previous expectations, we project leverage of about 8.0x in 2022,
up from about 3.8x in 2021." This is largely spurred by the expiry
of about 65% of the company's contracts in July 2021, not
sufficiently offset by meaningful short-term contract activity,
despite a higher-than-historical differential between Opal, Wyo.,
to Malin, Ore.

Ruby could engage in a distressed exchange or a restructuring.

The limited refinancing options, constrained liquidity, and
approaching debt maturity increase the likelihood that Ruby will
engage in transactions with its bondholders that we could
characterize as distressed based on the terms and conditions agreed
upon. This could be viewed as selective default and would result in
a further downgrade.

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our view that default is a
virtual certainty, without additional support from Ruby's indirect
owners, KMI and PPL. We could lower our ICR on Ruby to 'D' or 'SD'
if the company defaults or announces an exchange that we view as
distressed.

"We could lower our rating if Ruby defaults or announces an
exchange that we view as distressed.

"We do not expect a positive rating action over the next six months
given our assessment of the capital structure as unsustainable and
liquidity as weak. However, we could take a positive rating action
if Ruby has a refinancing strategy in place for the notes and if it
stabilizes its liquidity position, which could be achieved if the
indirect owners were to provide additional support."


S&S HOLDINGS: Moody's Hikes CFR to B2, Outlook Remains Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded S&S Holdings, LLC's corporate
family rating from B3 to B2 and probability of default rating from
B3-PD to B2-PD. Moody's also affirmed S&S' B2 senior secured first
lien term loan rating, which includes a proposed $150 million
add-on, and Caa1 senior secured second lien term loan rating. The
outlook remains stable. The proceeds from the add-on are expected
be used along with balance sheet cash to fund an acquisition.

The CFR upgrade reflects S&S' stronger than expected operating
performance which has led to deleveraging through EBITDA growth.
Following the LBO, pro forma Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA was
greater than 7x for the LTM period ending November 30, 2020. Pro
forma for the proposed debt add-on and acquired company EBITDA,
Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA is approximately 5x for the LTM period
ending September 30, 2021. The affirmation of the B2 senior secured
first lien term loan rating and Caa1 second lien term loan rating
reflects the proposed $50 million increase in the size of S&S's
asset based revolving credit facility to $275 million which places
additional debt ahead of the term loan facilities in the capital
structure.

Upgrades:

Issuer: S&S Holdings, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B2 from B3

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B2-PD from B3-PD

Affirmations:

Issuer: S&S Holdings, LLC

Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan, Affirmed Caa1 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: S&S Holdings, LLC

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

S&S' B2 CFR is constrained by its private equity ownership,
moderately high leverage and high supplier concentration. The
credit profile is also constrained by the company's exposure to the
cyclicality of the apparel industry and the competitive nature of
the apparel distribution industry.

The B2 CFR is supported by S&S' strong and growing market position
in a niche category, low customer concentration and broad
geographic footprint in the United States and Canada which allows
its product to reach the vast majority of the US in 1 to 2 business
days. The credit profile is also supported by the company's good
interest coverage, good liquidity and asset lite business model.

S&S' good liquidity reflects $40 million of balance sheet cash at
transaction close and full availability on its $225 million
asset-based lending (ABL) revolving credit facility which is
expected to be upsized to $275 million and undrawn at close. Free
cash flow has been strong in 2021 and is expected to continue in
2022.

The stable outlook reflects the expectation of good liquidity and
the expectation for continued sales growth and sustained profit
margins but that financial policy risks under its private equity
ownership will likely result in leverage remaining moderately
high.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be downgraded if S&S' liquidity, operating
performance or vendor relationships deteriorate. Quantitatively,
the ratings could be downgraded if debt/EBITDA is maintained above
5.5x or EBITA/interest expense declines below 2x.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company maintains financial
strategies that support solid credit metrics and if revenues and
earnings improve materially while maintaining good liquidity.
Quantitatively, the ratings could be upgraded if the company
maintains debt/EBITDA below 4.5x and EBITA/interest expense above
2.75x.

Headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois, S&S is a distributor of
blank apparel from retail brands to imprintable apparel customers.
Revenue for the LTM period ending September 30, 2021 was
approximately $1.7 billion. The company is majority owned by
Clayton, Dubilier & Rice.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.


S&S HOLDINGS: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B' on Continued Deleveraging
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on S&S Holdings
LLC (d/b/a S&S Activewear) to 'B' from 'B-'. S&P also raised its
issue-level rating on its first-lien debt and second-lien debt to
'B' and 'CCC+' from 'B-' and 'CCC', respectively. The recovery
ratings remain unchanged.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the
company will successfully integrate its recent acquisition and use
its improved scale and deeper penetration in its markets to
strengthen its EBITDA margins to the low-11% range and sustain its
debt to EBITDA comfortably below 6x.

"The upgrade reflects our expectation for prudent risk management
and leverage staying well-below 6x during the next 12 months. As of
the last 12 months (LTM) ended Sept. 30, 2021, adjusted leverage
declined to 5.2x, from 6.3x in the LTM ended June 30, 2021. S&S's
current revenue and EBITDA growth should translate into S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA notably below our previous 6x
upside trigger on Dec. 31, 2021. We project FOCF generation of
about $110 million-$118 million, supported by solid EBITDA margins
for its industry, and return to normalized capital expenditure
levels." S&S's sales grew more than 30% in the third quarter (ended
Sept. 30, 2021), with strong demand mainly driven by the
alleviation of pandemic restrictions and resumption of corporate,
team' sports and live events, as well as strength in consumer
demand and continued market share gains. In addition, the mix shift
to higher-margin products and price increases that were implemented
in 2020 provided an additional boost to the company's topline.
These factors translated into over 400 basis points (bps) in
reported EBITDA margin expansion in the third quarter 2021 to about
12%, up from 7.6% during that same time in 2020.

Despite the challenging macroeconomic environment, a key
differentiator from competitors stems from S&S's value-added
services such as personalized marketing and brand management and
its integrated technology and analytics platform, which allowed the
company to support higher sales volumes and efficiently onboard new
brands. In addition, specific productivity and pricing actions
allowed the company to offset most of the cost inflation expected
this year.

S&P said, "We believe the company will continue its consolidation
strategy for at least the next few years or so to increase its
scale and geographic diversity in the highly fragmented wholesale
blank apparel industry. S&S has completed four acquisitions
(including TSC Apparel) since 2010, allowing it to expand its
geographic footprint outside of the U.S. Although we have not
modeled any material debt-funded acquisitions into our base-case
forecast, we expect the company to continue demonstrating a
disciplined acquisition strategy to increase its scale and further
consolidate its industry. Therefore, we anticipate that S&S will
maintain adjusted leverage above 5x longer term to fund its growth
strategy. Moreover, the company's sponsors will likely seek a
return on their investment with the potential to extract returns in
the form of debt-financed dividends. That said, the use of balance
sheet cash to partially fund the TSC Apparel purchase demonstrates
some acquisition financing discipline. Over the next year, we are
forecasting credit metrics to remain commensurate with a 'B'
rating.

"The company's proposed acquisition of TSC Apparel, which will
enhance the company's scale, capabilities, and end-market
diversification should help improve overall profitability. S&S made
previous technology and distribution center investments, allowing
it to integrate new acquisitions successfully. We view the TSC
Apparel acquisition favorably as the company will likely see scale
benefits and product- and customer-mix enhancements. Moreover,
there is an opportunity to use its operational capabilities to
uplift TSC margins in line with those of S&S. TSC is a national
distributor of imprintable apparel and accessories, serving a
highly diverse customer base across a nationwide network of seven
distribution centers. The company has three distinct business
units, which will allow S&S to expand its service offering to
include decoration capabilities and private brands offerings while
deepening its penetration in some of its end-markets such as the
collegiate and corporate accounts space. Over the next year, we
anticipate that S&S will realize synergies from the acquisition,
including consolidating its distribution centers which will
translate into lower selling, general and administrative (SG&A)
costs, warehouse, and logistics advantages, as well as corporate
costs savings.

"However, negative tailwinds related to COVID-19 business
disruptions remain a constraint. We believe S&S faces heightened
operating risks, such as supply chain disruptions, which could
hinder its ability to source enough inventory to fulfill its
growing demand; margin pressures resulting from labor capacity
issues; container inflation; and higher freight costs. Given our
expectation of solid revenue growth in 2021 and 2022, we estimate
the company will look to build up its inventory levels in 2022. So
far this year, the supply chain disruptions have been a significant
hurdle to companies purchasing enough inventory to meet demand. Up
to now, S&S has shown resiliency throughout the pandemic. However,
its ability to source enough inventory and dispatch parcels within
its sales fulfillment timeline depends on many factors outside the
company's control. Although, we note that these challenges are felt
amongst most of its peers within the distribution industry.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation the company will
successfully integrate its recent acquisition and use its improved
scale and deeper penetration in its markets to strengthen its
EBITDA margins to the low-11% area and sustain its debt to EBITDA
comfortably below 6x."

S&P could lower the rating if leverage approached 6.5x or it no
longer believed the company would generate meaningful free cash
flow. This could happen if:

-- Cost savings were insufficient to offset higher input cost
inflation, leading to significant EBITDA margin erosion compared
with our expectations;

-- There is a shift toward a more aggressive financial policy such
as a large debt-funded acquisition or dividend.

Although unlikely over the next 12 months, S&P could raise its
rating on S&S if it believed the company would sustain leverage
below 5x over several years along with:

-- Achieving sustained organic growth by continuing to expand its
distribution and marketing capabilities, and diversifying its
revenue base;

-- The realization of planned pricing and productivity initiatives
to offset cost inflation, resulting in sustained EBITDA margin;
and

-- Demonstrated conservative financial policies by not making
large, debt-financed dividends or acquisitions.



SCULPTOR CAPITAL: Fitch Withdraws Ratings
-----------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Sculptor Capital Management, Inc. and
its related entities' (collectively, Sculptor) Long-Term Issuer
Default Ratings (IDR) to 'BB' from 'B+'. The Rating Outlook is
Stable.

The rating actions have been taken as part of a periodic peer
review of the alternative investment manager (IM) industry, which
is comprised of 11 publicly rated global firms.

Concurrently, Fitch has withdrawn the ratings for Sculptor for
commercial reasons.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDR

The ratings upgrade reflects the significant improvement in
leverage, interest coverage and profitability metrics for Scupltor
in the past year. Sculptor's assets under management (AUM) have
continued to expand, which has resulted in improved management fees
and fee-related EBITDA (FEBITDA), allowing the firm to pay down
outstanding debt.

The ratings are also supported by Sculptor's long-term performance
track record and franchise, particularly in its core multi-strategy
hedge fund business and continued expansion into credit and real
estate products, which have committed capital structures and
generate more consistent fee revenue.

Key rating constraints include the business model's sensitivity to
market risk due to the still meaningful amount of net asset
value-based management fees, weaker FEBITDA margins relative to
peers, and less diversified AUM relative to higher-rated
alternative IMs. Reduced investor appetite for hedge funds as an
asset class has pressured fund flows for the hedge fund industry as
a whole.

AUM and management fees rebounded over the past two years driven by
net inflows into the master fund and other higher fee strategies.
Sculptor had seen significant declines in AUM and management fees
during 2016-2017 as the firm moved through a leadership transition
and legal challenges. Outflows in the master fund had been offset
by inflows into real estate and Institutional Credit Strategies,
however, management fees had continued to decline given the adverse
impact on the blended fee rate. With the firm's legal issues now
resolved, Fitch believes the fundraising outlook for the master
fund and the platform as a whole is strong given consistent fund
performance.

Sculptor's FEBITDA margin was 17.7% for the TTM ended June 30,
2021, which, though much improved from 9.0% in 2020, remains well
below Sculptor's longer-term historical range of 35% to 45%, but
within Fitch's 'bb' category benchmark range of 10%-20%. In its
analysis of Sculptor, Fitch uses FEBITDA as a proxy for cash flow,
which consists of management fees, less compensation expenses
(including salary and a minimum level of bonus assumed to be the
higher of 25% of management fees or management guidance), less
operating expenses, plus depreciation and amortization. The
calculation excludes incentive income and incentive-related
compensation, which is approximated based on company disclosures.

Sculptor's leverage was 1.9x for the TTM ended June 30, 2021, down
significantly from 13.6x at YE 2020. The November 2020
recapitalization transaction with Delaware Life Insurance Company
reduced outstanding debt to $320 million from $415.5 million,
including the accrued preferred dividends, by capturing available
prepayment discounts of $62.3 million and by partially drawing down
on existing cash reserves. Since then, Sculptor has repaid an
additional $225 million of debt, reducing outstanding borrowings
substantially, which, along with the improvements in profitability
and FEBITDA, led to the deleveraging.

Interest coverage was 2.9x for the TTM ended June 30, 2021; up from
1.4x in 2020 given the improvement in FEBITDA. Fitch expects
interest coverage to improve further prospectively, given reduced
interest expenses on lower outstanding debt. Sculptor's liquidity
profile remains strong with $385 million in unrestricted cash and
equivalents and long-term U.S. Government obligations as of Sept.
30, 2021, which puts the company in a negative net debt position.
Sculptor also has availability under its $25.0 million revolving
credit facility, which acts as a contingent liquidity source.

The Stable Rating Outlook reflects Fitch's view that the
deleveraging and improved liquidity profile positions Sculptor well
to absorb any future performance volatility and the resultant
impacts on flows, AUM and FEBITDA.

SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATED COMPANIES

Sculptor is a publicly traded holding company, and its primary
assets are ownership interests in the operating group entities
(Sculptor Capital LP, Sculptor Capital Advisors LP and Sculptor
Capital Advisors II LP), which earn management and incentive fees
and are directly held through one intermediate holding company.
Sculptor conducts substantially all of its business through the
operating group entities. The IDRs assigned to Sculptor Capital LP,
Sculptor Capital Advisors LP and Sculptor Capital Advisors II LP
are equalized with the ratings assigned to Sculptor, reflecting the
joint and several guarantees among the entities.

Sculptor Capital LP serves as the debt-issuing entity for
Sculptor's secured debt and benefits from joint and several
guarantees from the management and incentive-fee generating
operating group entities.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Rating sensitivities are no longer relevant as the ratings are
being withdrawn.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions and
Covered Bond issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


SENIOR HEALTHCARE: Unsecureds Will Get 49.2% of Claims in Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Healthcare, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Maryland a Disclosure Statement in support of Plan
of Reorganization dated November 1, 2021.

The Debtor is an corporation organized and operating in the state
of Maryland. It was formed on September 8, 1997, as a C Corporation
for the express purpose of owning and operating an 8- bed assisted
living facility in Silver Spring, Maryland (the "Facility").

Since its inception, Rajendra B. Shrestha has worked full time on
behalf of the Company. He received $140,000 in compensation paid by
the Debtor during the two years prior to the commencement of the
Debtor's bankruptcy case, but has received no compensation since
the filing of the Debtor's petition.

By June of 2019, the Debtor received default notices from on
Merchant loans eventually a notice of Foreclosure from Goldsmith
Equity Group in August 2019. The Debtor attempted to resolve the
financial issues and bring the loans current but was unable to do
so. In early 2020, the COVID-19 outbreak further complicating its
efforts, as the Debtor was unable to bring in new tenants due to
quarantine requirements.

In order to stay a pending foreclosure sale of its Facility, the
Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the federal bankruptcy
code on August 2, 2021.

The Plan will treat claims as follows:

     * Class II consists of the Secured Claim of the C Store, Inc.
secured by first and second deeds of trust against the Facility in
the aggregate sum of $468,000.00, plus post-petition interest at
the rate of 12% per annum. Upon confirmation of the Chapter 11
Plan, the entire balance of the notes secured by the deeds of
trust, including all pre-petition and post-petition arrears due on
the both loans shall be aggregated into a new promissory note,
secured by a first deed of trust against the Facility. Such an
amortization will require monthly installment payments of an
estimated $3,210 for the initial 24 months, and an estimated $4,814
per month for the second 24 month period. Payments on the new
promissory note shall commence on the Effective Date and the entire
unpaid balance of the new promissory note will come due and payable
one month after the four year anniversary of the Effective Date. C
Store, Inc. shall retain a first position lien against the Facility
until its Claim is paid in full.

     * Class III consists of Allowed Unsecured Claims. The Debtor
estimates that the balance of all general unsecured claims is
$132,000. This Class shall share, pro-rata, in a total distribution
of $65,000 paid in 10 semi-annual payments commencing of the third
monthly anniversary of the Effective Date and continuing every 6
months thereafter. The Debtor estimates that this will result in a
distribution of approximately 49.2% of Allowed Claims in this
Class.

     * Class IV consists of Interests of Shareholders. At the time
of the commencement of this case, Shreshta owned 100% of the issued
and outstanding shares of the Debtor. Since the commencement of
this case, Shreshta has paid the full year of premiums due on the
Debtor's property insurance and liability insurance in the total
sum of $6,798. That sum shall constitute an equity contribution to
the Debtor in return for the retention of its stock interest.

The Debtor shall fund payments under the Plan from cash on hand as
of the Effective Datea nd cash flow from the Debtor's operations.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated November 01,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3CVhRzC from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Counsel for Debtor-in-Possession:

     COHEN, BALDINGER & GREENFELD, LLC
     Steven H. Greenfeld
     2600 Tower Oaks Boulevard
     Suite 290
     Rockville, MD 20852
     (301) 881-8300
     Steveng@cohenbaldinger.com

                    About Senior Healthcare Inc.

Senior Healthcare, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 21-15037) on Aug. 2, 2021, listing as much
as $1 million in assets and as much as $500,000 in liabilities.

Judge Thomas J. Catliota oversees the case.

Cohen Baldinger & Greenfeld, LLC serves as the Debtor's legal
counsel.


SEQUENTIAL BRANDS: Ex-CEO Shmidman Gets Jo's Jeans Brand
--------------------------------------------------------
WHP Global, the brand management company founded by former
Sequential Brands Group Chief Executive Officer Yehuda Shmidman,
has bought Sequential Brands' Joe's Jeans brand, joining other
industry peers in snapping up the piecemeal assets of the bankrupt
Sequential Brands Group.

Bloomberg recounts that Mr. Shmidman was hired as the CEO of
Sequential Brands in 2012, and stepped down in 2017 as the company
struggled to digest its $353 million acquisition of Martha Stewart
Living.

Centric Brands LLC and WHP Global announced Nov. 5, 2021, they have
signed a definitive agreement and received court approval to
purchase the Joe's Jeans brand, which will be subject to customary
closing conditions.  As part of the agreement, WHP will own the
worldwide intellectual property in all global territories other
than China and Centric will continue to operate Joe's Jeans under a
long-term exclusive license for their core categories and
geographies across retail, wholesale, and e-commerce channels.

Founded in 2001, Joe's Jeans has redefined premium denim with its
inherently LA sensibility and distinctive point-of-view.  Joe's
Jeans offers denim, apparel, and accessories and is available at
premium department stores in the United States, at specialty
boutiques globally, 10 Joe's Jeans stores, and at the digital
flagship http://www.joesjeans.com/

"We have significantly invested in Joe's Jeans throughout our years
of operation and have established the brand as one of the leading
premium denim resources," said Jason Rabin, Chief Executive Officer
of Centric Brands.  "Celebrating its 20th year, we look forward to
partnering with WHP Global to further develop the brand and new
avenues to grow the business."

Centric Brands is a global lifestyle brand collective that designs,
sources, markets, and sells high-quality products in the kids,
men's and women's apparel, accessories, beauty, and entertainment
categories.  The company's portfolio includes over 100 owned and
licensed iconic brands collectively generating approximately $2.5
billion in annual global sales.

"The acquisition of Joe's Jeans in partnership with Centric is a
win for WHP Global as it expands our growing fashion vertical which
already includes ANNE KLEIN and JOSEPH ABBOUD," stated Yehuda
Shmidman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at WHP Global.
"Together with Centric, we will look to build upon the core
business and expand around the world to new geographies."

WHP Global is a leading New York based brand acquisition and
management firm backed by equity capital from funds managed by
Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. and leverage financing provided by
BlackRock. Following the close of the transaction, WHP's portfolio
-- including Joe's Jeans, William Rast, Toys "R" Us, Babies "R" Us,
Anne Klein, Joseph Abboud, and Lotto -- will collectively generate
approximately $4 billion in annual global retail sales.

                    About Centric Brands LLC

Centric Brands LLC is a leading lifestyle brand collective that
designs, sources, markets, and sells high-quality products in the
kids, men's and women's apparel, accessories, beauty, and
entertainment categories.  The Company's portfolio includes
licenses for more than 100 iconic brands, including Calvin Klein,
Tommy Hilfiger, Nautica, Spyder, and Under Armour in the kid's
category; Joe’s Jeans, Buffalo, Herve Leger, and Izod in the
men's and women's apparel category; Kate Spade, Michael Kors, All
Saints, Frye, Timberland, Kenneth Cole, and Jessica Simpson in the
accessories category; and in the entertainment category, Disney,
Marvel, Nickelodeon, and Warner Brothers among many others.  The
Company also owns and operates brands such as Zac Posen, Hudson,
Robert Graham, Avirex, and Taste Beauty and operates a joint
venture brand, Favorite Daughter, with Sara and Erin Foster.  The
Company's products are sold primarily in North America through
leading mass-market retailers, specialty and department stores, and
online. Centric Brands LLC has unparalleled expertise in product
design, development and sourcing, retail and digital commerce,
marketing, and brand building. The Company is headquartered in New
York City, with U.S. offices in Los Angeles and Greensboro, and
international offices in London, Toronto, and Montreal.  On the
Web: http://www.centricbrands.com/

                         About WHP Global

WHP Global is a leading New York based firm that acquires global
consumer brands and invests in high-growth distribution channels
including digital commerce platforms and global expansion.  WHP
owns ANNE KLEIN, JOSEPH ABBOUD, LOTTO and a controlling interest in
TOYS "R" US, BABIES "R" US, Geoffrey the Giraffe and more than 20
additional consumer brands in the toy and baby categories.  In
addition, WHP signed a definitive agreement to acquire JOE'S JEANS
and WILLIAM RAST.  The company also owns WHP+ (www.whp-plus.com), a
turnkey direct to consumer digital e-commerce platform for brands,
with full in-house operations including technology, data analytics,
logistics, creative and digital marketing.  On the Web:
http://www.whp-global.com/

                   About Sequential Brands Group

Sequential Brands Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SQBG), together with its
subsidiaries, owns various consumer brands. The New York-based
company licenses its brands for a range of product categories,
including apparel, footwear, fashion accessories, and home goods.

Sequential Brands Group and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-11194) on Aug. 31,
2021. The company disclosed total assets of $442,774,937 and debt
of $435,073,539 as of Aug. 30, 2021.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP and Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones, LLP as legal counsel.  Miller Buckfire & Co. and its
affiliate, Stifel Nicolaus & Co., Inc., serve as financial advisor
and investment banker.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC, is the
claims agent and administrative advisor.

King & Spalding, LLP, is counsel to the debtor-in-possession
lenders (and the consenting lenders under the restructuring support
agreement) while Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP serve as the
DIP lenders' local counsel.


SEQUENTIAL BRANDS: Jessica Simpson Wins OK to Buy Back Brand
------------------------------------------------------------
Eliza Ronalds-Hannon of Bloomberg News reports that Jessica
Simpson's company, With You Inc., won court approval for its bid to
pay Sequential Brands Group Inc. $65 million for the majority share
of the singer-turned-fashion entrepreneur's brand, according to
court documents.

Under a purchase agreement with bankrupt Sequential, which has been
the majority owner of the brand, Simpson agreed to pay $65 million
as the stalking horse bidder
Simpson's company owned a minority stake.

                   About Sequential Brands Group

Sequential Brands Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:SQBG), together with its
subsidiaries, owns various consumer brands. The New York-based
company licenses its brands for a range of product categories,
including apparel, footwear, fashion accessories, and home goods.

Sequential Brands Group and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-11194) on Aug. 31,
2021. The company disclosed total assets of $442,774,937 and debt
of $435,073,539 as of Aug. 30, 2021.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP and Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones, LLP as legal counsel. Miller Buckfire & Co. and its
affiliate, Stifel Nicolaus & Co., Inc., serve as financial advisor
and investment banker.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC, is the
claims agent and administrative advisor.

King & Spalding, LLP, is counsel to the debtor-in-possession
lenders (and the consenting lenders under the restructuring support
agreement) while Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP serve as the
DIP lenders' local counsel.



SILVER LAKES RESORT: Taps Porter & Lasiewicz as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------
Silver Lakes Resort Lodge Interval Owner's Association seeks
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California to employ Porter & Lasiewicz CPAs as its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor as a non-profit association in
determining the capital gains tax liability of the timeshare
interest sold by its members.

The firm will be paid an hourly fee of $325 and a retainer of
$3,250.  It will also receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Gary Porter, a partner at Porter & Lasiewicz, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Gary Porter
     Porter & Lasiewicz CPAs
     980 Enchanted Way, Suite 104
     Simi Valley, CA 93065
     Tel: (805) 433-6022
     Email: gporter@pl.cpa

                  About Silver Lakes Resort Lodge
                    Interval Owner's Association

Silver Lakes Resort Lodge Interval Owners Association --
https://www.innatsilverlakes.com/ -- is an association of owners of
The Inn at Silver Lakes, a resort in Southern California that is
affiliated with RCI and Interval International.

Silver Lakes Resort Lodge Interval Owners Association sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D.
Calif. Case No. 19-16352) on July 20, 2019, listing as much as $10
million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Mark S. Wallace
oversees the case.

Teresa A. Blasberg, Esq., at Blasberg & Associates and Porter &
Lasiewicz CPAs are the Debtor's legal counsel and accountant,
respectively.


SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY: Fitch Alters Outlook on 'BB' LT IDR to Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Southwestern Energy Company's Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB'. In addition, Fitch has
affirmed Southwestern's senior secured revolver at 'BBB-'/'RR1' and
senior unsecured notes at 'BB'/'RR4'. The Rating Outlook has been
revised to Stable from Positive.

Southwestern's ratings are supported by its production scale,
expectation of material FCF generation at current Strip prices,
manageable debt maturity profile, solid hedging program and ample
liquidity. This is partially offset by the need to integrate a
large acquisition and increasing differentials in the Appalachian
basin.

The Outlook revision to Stable reflects Fitch's belief that the GEP
acquisition, while accretive on current Strip pricing, is not as
accretive on lower price scenarios due to the amount of debt in the
transaction.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

GEP Haynesville Acquisition: Southwestern has entered into a
definitive agreement to buy GEP Haynesville for $1.85 billion. The
transaction would add 700 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) of
production, making Southwestern one of the largest natural gas
producers in North America. The acquisition will be financed by
$1.325 billion of cash, which Fitch believes will be funded by
debt, and $525 million of Southwestern common shares. Fitch
believes the acquisition is credit accretive at current Strip
prices, but not as accretive at prices similar to pre-2021 levels.

Southwestern's overall natural gas differential is expected to
reduce given its increased footprint in the Haynesville. The
increased scale in this area should also result in operational
efficiencies and provide for marketing synergies.

Extended Debt Maturity Schedule: Fitch believes Southwestern has a
manageable maturity schedule with approximately $700 million due in
2025. FCF is expected to reduce borrowings under the revolver ($665
million as of Sept. 30, 2021), which is due in 2024. Fitch does not
expect the GEP transaction to have a material increase in near-term
debt obligations.

FCF Pivot: Fitch expects Southwestern to generate material FCF
under its base case natural gas prices ($2.90 in 2021 and $2.45
over the long-term). FCF projections under current Strip pricing
are significantly higher and could result in faster debt reduction.
Fitch expects near-term FCF will be applied to debt reduction, as
management has lowered its debt/EBITDA target to 1.0x-1.5x.

Achieving Scale Benefits: Southwestern's acquisition strategy is an
attempt to reap the benefits of scale, which includes operating and
cost synergies. The company has a strong footprint in Appalachia,
with 789,000 net acres and net production of 3.0 billion cubic feet
equivalent per day (bcfe/d). Pro forma for the GEP transaction, the
Haynesville footprint would include 269,000 net acres and net
production of 1.7 bcfe/d. Combined, Southwestern would be one of
the largest natural gas producers in North America.

Fitch believes the Appalachian acreage continues to deliver
favorable operational results and believes development spending in
its liquids-weighted region combined with the recovery in NGL
pricing should help support netbacks. Widening differentials and
takeaway capacity remain long-term concerns for Appalachian
operators. Netbacks in Appalachia are typically lower than
operators in the Haynesville.

Hedges Provide Near-Term Support: Pro forma for the transaction,
Southwestern is expected to hedge consistent with management's
existing risk management strategy to protect against the additional
debt incurred in the transaction. GEP has existing hedge positions
for approximately 35% of its 2022 production. Based on
Southwestern's historical hedging strategy, Fitch believes that
management may opportunistically add more hedges.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Pro-forma for the Indigo and GEP transactions, Southwestern remains
one of the largest U.S. natural gas E&P companies at approximately
4.7 Bcfe/d, larger than CNX Resources (CNX; BB/Positive), but below
EQT Corporation (EQT; BB+/Stable) at 5.5 bcfe/d pro forma for its
Alta Resources acquisition. Fitch estimates 2022 debt/EBITDA at
2.0x, which is lower than CNX (2.6x) and EQT (2.4x) based on
Fitch's current price deck. Southwestern's liquidity as of June 30,
2021 was weaker than CNX and EQT, although this is offset by
expectations of positive FCF and lack of material near-term
maturities.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

-- WTI oil price of $60.00/bbl in 2021, $52.00/bbl in 2022,
    $50.00/bbl in 2023 and in the long term;

-- Henry Hub natural gas price of $2.90/mcf in 2021 and $2.45 in
    the long term;

-- Production of 3.4 Bcfe/d in 2021, 4.8 Bcfe/d in 2022 and flat
    over the long term;

-- Liquids mix of 12% in 2022 and throughout the forecast;

-- Capex above $1.1 billion in 2021 and $1.9 billion in 2022;

-- No material M&A activity or shareholder activity.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Generation of material FCF with proceeds used to reduce debt
    and progress to management's leverage targets;

-- Mid-cycle debt/EBITDA below 2.0x or FFO-Adjusted Leverage
    below 2.5x on a sustained basis;

-- Operational execution of Appalachian and Haynesville
    development plans;

-- Successful integration of the GEP acquisitions;

-- Demonstrated commitment to stated financial policy.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Mid-cycle debt/EBITDA above 2.5x or FFO-Adjusted Leverage
    above 3.0x on a sustained basis;

-- Operational and financial plan that fails to execute on
    Appalachian and Haynesville development and support FCF
    neutrality;

-- Weakening in differential trends and the unit cost profile.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: Southwestern's liquidity consists of $2 million
of cash on hand and a $2.0 billion secured credit facility with
availability of $1.2 billion after $665 million drawn $159 million
in letters of credit as of Sept. 30, 2021. The borrowing base and
elected commitments were re-determined at $2.0 billion in October
2021. The revolver matures in April 2024.

Financial covenants under the credit facility include a minimum
current ratio (including unused commitments under the credit
agreement) of 1.0x and a maximum total net leverage ratio of no
greater than 4.00x after June 30, 2020. As of Sept. 30, 2021,
Southwestern was in compliance with all of its covenants.

The next material bond maturity is in 2025 of approximately $700
million. Fitch anticipates FCF will be used to reduce outstanding
revolver borrowings in the near term.

ISSUER PROFILE

Southwestern Energy Company is an independent energy company
engaged in exploration and development of, principally, natural
gas. E&P operations are primarily comprised of Northeast Appalachia
in Pennsylvania, Southwest Appalachia in West Virginia and the
Haynesville Basin in Louisiana.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY: S&P Places 'BB' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed its ratings, including the 'BB' issuer
credit rating, on Spring, Texas-based independent E&P company
Southwestern on CreditWatch with positive implications following
the announcement that it plans to acquire GEP Haynesville for
approximately $1.85 billion in cash and stock.

S&P said, "We expect to raise the issuer credit and senior
unsecured ratings one notch to 'BB+' if the acquisition closes as
expected.

"The GEP acquisition further strengthens Southwestern's position in
the Haynesville, boosting its total proved reserves to
approximately 20.9 trillion cubic feet equivalent and we expect
production to increase to approximately 4.7 billion cubic feet
(bcf) equivalent per day. This transaction positions Southwestern
as the largest producer in the Haynesville with 1.7 bcf/d of net
production, and as one of the largest natural gas producers in the
U.S. Additionally, this transaction increases the company's
geographic diversity with two core operating basins in the
Haynesville and Marcellus shales and makes it the largest
dual-basin natural gas operator. Southwestern expects about 65% of
its daily production will be marketed to demand centers along the
Gulf Coast, which typically receives higher prices than in
Appalachia, and should help to improve margins and cash flow.

"We expect Southwestern to maintain conservative financial policies
that lead to significant free cash flow generation.

"While this transaction will increase total debt levels, we expect
Southwestern to generate meaningful free cash flow over the next
two years, which it will use to pay down debt and improve leverage.
We estimate Southwestern will generate approximately $475 million
in free cash flow in 2021 and more meaningful free cash flow in
2022, which we expect to go toward debt reduction. Southwestern is
targeting $3.0 billion-$3.5 billion of total debt and debt to
EBITDA of 1x-1.5x before initiating shareholder returns. We expect
Southwestern to remain focused on strengthening its balance sheet
to provide greater cushion in the event of natural gas price swings
and resulting cash flow volatility.

"The positive CreditWatch reflects the likelihood that we will
raise the issuer credit and senior unsecured ratings one notch to
'BB+' upon the close of the acquisition if there are no material
changes to our assumptions. We expect to resolve the CreditWatch
listing around the close of the transaction, expected in the fourth
quarter of 2021."



STERICYCLE INC: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Stericycle, Inc.'s (SRCL) Long-term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.
Fitch has also affirmed SRCL's senior unsecured notes at
'BB'/'RR4'.

The ratings for SRCL incorporate the company's solid market
position, generally stable demand characteristics of waste
management and good FCF generation. SRCL is the top servicer of
medical waste and document shredding in the U.S., two industries
with consistent waste production fundamentals, outside of COVID
disruptions. These strengths are primarily weighed against its high
leverage and execution risks as it looks to transform its business
and implement a large-scale enterprise resource planning (ERP)
system.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Execution Risks in Focus: The implementation of SRCL's ERP system
within the North American secure information destruction segment in
3Q 2021 experienced challenges that led to a step-down in EBITDA
margins and a yoy decline in segment organic revenue. The company
aims to roll out the platform across the regulated waste and
compliance services segment in 2022, and Fitch sees a high degree
of risk that similar challenges will persist. The challenges are
likely to be near-term in nature, however; severe disruptions that
extend the implementation timeline, higher costs or lower revenues
are a lingering concern.

Weaker Near-Term Profitability: The ratings consider Fitch's
near-term expectations that EBITDA margins will decline to around
18% in 2021, from 19% in 2020, and will remain around 18% through
2022. The expectation considers the incremental ERP system costs,
risk of continue implementation challenges, and unfavorable effects
of cost inflation. Fitch anticipates FCF margins around the
mid-single digits over the next couple years but continues to watch
cash costs items such as ERP implementation, legal settlements, and
backed up capex spend that could pressure or add volatility to
FCF.

Steady Near-Term Leverage: Fitch expects adjusted debt/EBITDAR to
remain around the low-4.0x range in 2021 and 2022, similar to 4.3x
at FYE2020. The expectation assumes continued margin pressures,
which are moderated by SRCL's focus on debt repayment. Traditional
debt/EBITDA is expected to be around the mid-3x in 2021. The
expectation places SRCL's leverage profile as higher than the
larger solid waste peers yet within its thresholds for the 'BB'
rating.

Developing Financial Policies: SRCL's new management team has
remained committed to deleveraging, utilizing FCF and divestiture
proceeds. As the company moves closer to its target leverage level,
new capital deployment priorities are on the horizon. While Fitch
does not anticipate a deviation from its leverage range, a shift
over time to aggressively pursue M&A or capital returns could
pressure financial flexibility.

Established Market Position: SRCL holds the top or a leading market
position in main end markets, including medical waste and paper
shredding services. Its competitive position is supported by its
broad network of complementary services, regulatory know-how and
established reputation. Despite its leading position, competition
is often local, where small competitors may compete on price.

Core Business Cyclicality: SRCL generally benefits from recurring
demand dynamics associated with the routine and scheduled services
for medical waste collection and document shredding. While the
secure information destruction segment experienced a deep downturn
in 2020 due to closed office spaces, the business is not expected
to be particularly sensitive to normal business cycles. It has
lengthy contract durations of around 3-5 years for the majority of
its customers. It has also divested of more volatile business such
as environmental solutions and the recall business in 2020 as well
as implemented risk-sharing surcharges to soften swings in recycled
paper prices.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Fitch compares SRCL to the large municipal solid waste firms Waste
Management (WM; BBB+), Waste Connections (WCN; BBB+) and Republic
Services (RSG; BBB). Fitch views SRCL's business profile as
relatively weaker than these peers due to the concentration in end
markets, higher risk of competitive pressures, and remaining
execution risks. Fitch expects adjusted debt/EBITDAR in the
low-4.0x range versus debt/EBITDA of about 3.0x for RSG and the
mid-to-high 2.0x for WM and WCN. Fitch also believes SRCL's FCF
margin will range in the mid-single digits over the next few years,
a similar level to WM and WCN and well below WCN's of over 10%.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Flat overall growth in 2021 with mid-single digit organic
    growth more than offset by divestitures;

-- Low-single digit in 2022 with mid-single digit secure
    information destruction revenue, moderated by fairly flat RWCS
    revenue which Fitch assumes will face some headwinds from
    lower COVID-related revenue and challenges implementing the
    ERP system;

-- EBITDA margins decline to around 18% for FY2021, from about
    19% 9Mo YTD, and remain fairly steady in 2022 while it faces
    higher costs associated with the ERP system as well as
    persistent cost inflation;

-- Capital expenditures are around $120 million in 2021 then step
    ups, assuming postponed spending returns in 2022;

-- SRCL remains dedicated to reaching its net leverage target of
    under 3.0x.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Strong business transformation performance, deleveraging
    divestitures and/or a dedicated financial policy leads to
    maintaining Adj. debt/ EBITDAR sustained below 4.25x;

-- FCF margin sustainably above the mid-single digits;

-- Good indications of strong execution against ERP
    implementation and other key initiatives that leads to a
    higher confidence in future performance.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Beyond the near term, continued margin pressures or a less
    conservative financial policy leads to maintaining Adj.
    debt/EBITDAR above 5.0x;

-- EBITDA and/or FCF margin sustained below the mid-teens and
    below the mid-single digits, respectively;

-- Substantial strategic changes under the new leadership team
    lead to a deterioration in its credit profile.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

As of Sept. 30, 2021, SRCL's liquidity was approximately $651
million and consisted of $38 million of cash and $752 million of
availability under its $1.2 billion revolving credit facility,
after considering borrowings and letters of credit. The $600
million of senior unsecured notes due 2024 matures first.

Fitch has capitalized operating leases at 8x reflecting the high
proportion of leased assets utilized in SRCL's service network. The
multiple is based on the high proportion of operations in the U.S.
and Canada and Fitch's conservative assumption that leased assets
have long economic lives. The approach is intended to adjust for
differences in financing decisions between SRCL and other waste
companies that typically have a relatively low proportion of leased
assets within their network

ISSUER PROFILE

Stericycle is a leading provider of regulated medical waste and
document shredding services. It operates a network of collection,
processing and recycling assets across the U.S. and certain
international regions. It primarily services medical and commercial
end markets.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch has made no material adjustments that are not disclosed
within the company's filings.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


T2 BIOSYSTEMS: Issues Going-Concern Warning
-------------------------------------------
T2 Biosystems, Inc., warned in a recent filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission that substantial doubt exists
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a
period of at least the next 12 months.

At September 30, 2021, the Company had cash, cash equivalents,
marketable securities and restricted cash of $43.6 million, an
accumulated deficit of $460.1 million, stockholders' deficit of
$2.5 million, and has experienced cash outflows from operating
activities over the past years. The future success of the Company
is dependent on its ability to successfully commercialize its
products, obtain regulatory clearance for and successfully launch
its future product candidates, obtain additional capital and
ultimately attain profitable operations.

Historically, the Company has funded its operations primarily
through its August 2014 initial public offering, its December 2015
public offering, its September 2016 private investment in public
equity ("PIPE") financing, its September 2017 public offering, its
June 2018 public offering, its July 2019 establishment of an Equity
Distribution Agreement and Equity Purchase Agreement, its March
2021 establishment of an Equity Distribution Agreement, private
placements of redeemable convertible preferred stock and through
debt financing arrangements.

The Company said the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted and may
continue to impact operations. The Company has established
protocols for continued manufacturing, distribution and servicing
of its products with safe social distancing and personal protective
equipment measures and for remote work for certain employees not
essential to on-site operations. To date these measures have been
mostly successful but may not continue to function should the
pandemic escalate and impact personnel.

The Company has a significant development contract with the
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and should
BARDA reduce, cancel or not grant additional milestone projects,
the Company's ability to continue its future product development
may be impacted. The ability of the Company's shipping carriers to
deliver products to customers may be disrupted.

The Company has reviewed its suppliers and quantities of key
materials and believes that it has sufficient stocks and alternate
sources of critical materials including personal protective
equipment should the supply chains become disrupted, although raw
materials and plastics for the manufacturing of reagents and
consumables are in high demand, and interruptions in supply are
difficult to predict. At the onset of the pandemic, the Company
believed the pandemic's impact on its sales would affect the
recoverability of the value of T2-owned instruments and components.
In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic also caused the Company to
reassess its build plan and evaluate its inventories accordingly,
which resulted in an additional charge to cost of product revenue
for excess inventories.

The Company also disclosed that since FDA authorization was
obtained to market the T2Dx Instrument, T2Candida Panel, and
T2Bacteria Panel, and EUA was issued for the T2SARS-CoV-2 Panel, it
has incurred significant commercialization expenses related to
product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. The
Company may seek to fund its operations through public equity,
private equity or debt financings, as well as other sources.
However, the Company may be unable to raise additional funds or
enter into such other arrangements when needed, on favorable terms,
or at all. The Company's failure to raise capital or enter into
such other arrangements if and when needed would have a negative
impact on the Company's business, results of operations, financial
condition and the Company's ability to develop and commercialize
T2Dx, T2Candida, T2Bacteria, T2SARS-CoV-2, and other product
candidates.

While the Company believes that its cash, cash equivalents,
marketable securities and restricted cash of $43.6 million at
September 30, 2021 will be sufficient to fund its current operating
plan at least one year from issuance of these financial statements,
certain elements of our operating plan cannot be considered
probable. The future receipt of potential funding from
Co-Development partners and other resources cannot be considered
probable at this time because none of the plans are entirely within
the Company's control.

The Company also noted that the Term Loan Agreement with CRG
Servicing LLC has certain covenants which require the Company to
achieve certain annual revenue targets, whereby the Company is
required to pay double the amount of any shortfall as an
acceleration of principal payments, and maintain a minimum cash
balance of $5.0 million. In June 2021, the Company achieved the
revenue target for the 24-month period ended December 31, 2021.

While management believes the Company can continue as a going
concern for at least one year from issuance of these financial
statements, there can be no assurances that it will continue to be
in compliance with the cash covenant in future periods without
additional funding. The Company intends to continue to evaluate
options to refinance the Term Loan Agreement, which becomes due on
December 30, 2022. There can be no assurances that the Company will
be able to refinance on terms favorable or at all. The amounts
involved in any such transactions, individually or in the
aggregate, may be material.

The Company further noted that its stock has been trading under
$1.00. Should the Company's stock continue to trade under $1.00
through November 8, 2021, the Company is at risk of receiving a
letter from The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, as that would be the 30th
consecutive business day on which the Company's common stock will
have closed below the minimum $1.00 per share requirement for
continued listing on the Nasdaq Global Market under Nasdaq Listing
Rule 5450(a)(1). Under Nasdaq rules, the Company has 180 days to
regain compliance by increasing the stock price to over $1.00.
Remediation plans could include requesting a reverse stock split of
shareholders.

"These conditions raise substantial doubt regarding the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern for a period of one year
after the date that the financial statements are issued," the
Company said.  "Management's plans to alleviate the conditions that
raise substantial doubt include raising additional funding, earning
payments pursuant to the Company's Co-Development agreements,
delaying certain research projects and capital expenditures and
eliminating certain future operating expenses in order to fund
operations at reduced levels for the Company to continue as a going
concern for a period of 12 months from the date the financial
statements are issued. Management has concluded the likelihood that
its plan to successfully obtain sufficient funding from one or more
of these sources or adequately reduce expenditures, while
reasonably possible, is less than probable."

T2 Biosystems, Inc. and its subsidiary have operations based in
Lexington, Massachusetts. The Company is an in vitro diagnostics
company that has developed an innovative and proprietary technology
platform that offers a rapid, sensitive and simple alternative to
existing diagnostic methodologies.

T2 Biosystems $70 million in total assets against $72.4 million in
total liabilities as of September 30, 2021.  For the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2021, T2 Biosystems posted a net loss of
$13.9 million compared to a net loss of $11.2 million for the same
period in 2020.



TELIGENT INC: Unsecured Creditors Balk at Steep Roll-Up of Ares
---------------------------------------------------------------
Teligent Inc.'s unsecured creditors are opposing the Debtor's bid
to secure financing from existing lenders led by Ares Capital due
to the proposed roll-up of existing debt.

Teligent scored some cash from its existing lenders -- affiliates
of Ares -- on the condition that older debt be elevated in the
capital stack.

"On the eve of bankruptcy, the Secured Lenders -- likely
understanding what was to come -- created a liquidity crisis with
the Debtors by forcing the Debtors to repay them $10 million.  Now,
only a few weeks later, the Debtors come to this Court asking for
extraordinary relief to not only fix the liquidity problems the
Secured Lenders created, but to actually reward their machinations
by putting more money in their pockets and improving their
pre-petition position. Specifically, the proposed DIP facility
includes, among other draconian terms, separate roll-ups of the
First Lien Lenders' and Second Lien Lenders' prepetition debt
totaling $42.7 million, liens on avoidance actions and other
previously unencumbered assets, and impossibly tight sale
milestones -- all in return for only $12 million in "new" money,
$10 million of which the First Lien Lenders took from the Debtors
right before the filing.  For many reasons, the Court should reject
the invitation to grant the Secured Lenders the extraordinary
relief sought here that would harm the Debtors, their estates, and
all of their other creditors," the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors said in its objection to the Debtors' motion seeking
approval of the financing.

According to the Creditors Committee, although the DIP Motion did
not disclose the amount of accrued interest included in the
proposed roll-up of the Second Lien Lenders' claims, the Debtors
have told the Committee that it is more than $8.3 million.  The
Debtors are therefore proposing to roll-up more than $26.3 million
of the Second Lien Lenders' prepetition debt, in addition to the
First Lien Lenders' entire $16.4 million prepetition claim.

"The proposed roll-ups are unfair and unreasonable.  The Debtors
cite no case and the Committee has been unable to find one where a
Court approved a roll-up, much less two, in a liquidating chapter
11 where the debtor has ceased its core-business operations (here,
the manufacturing of pharmaceutical products) and was running a
sale process for the benefit of secured creditors.  And there is no
basis for making this case the first of its kind. Under the DIP
proposal, in return for $12 million (only $2 million of which is
truly new money), the Debtors are required to roll-up at least
$42.7 million of prepetition debt—nearly quadruple the amount of
"new" money the Secured Lenders are providing. And if one takes
into account that the lenders are simply relending the $10 million
they took on the eve of bankruptcy, the roll-up is 21.3 times the
value of the DIP Financing.  None of the cases the Debtors cite in
the DIP Motion approved a roll-up ratio so skewed," the Committee
tells the Court.

                      About Teligent Inc.

Teligent, Inc., a specialty generic pharmaceutical company,
develops, manufactures, markets, and sells generic topical, branded
generic, and generic injectable pharmaceutical products in the
United States and Canada.  The company was formerly known as IGI
Laboratories, Inc. and changed its name to Teligent, Inc. in
October 2015.  Teligent, Inc. was founded in 1977 and is based in
Buena, N.J.

Teligent and three affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 21-11332) on Oct. 14, 2021.  The cases are
handled by Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon.

As of Aug. 31, 2021, Teligent had total assets of $85 million and
total debt of $135.8 million.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP and K&L
Gates, LLP as legal counsel; Raymond James & Associates, Inc., as
investment banker; PharmaBioSource Realty, LLC as real estate
consultant; and Portage Point Partners, LLC as restructuring
advisor.  Vladimir Kasparov of Portage Point Partners serves as the
Debtors' chief restructuring officer. Epiq Corporate Restructuring,
LLC is the claims and noticing agent and administrative advisor.


TWO'S COMPANY: Taps Business Consultants as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------
Two's Company Restaurant & Lounge, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Wisconsin to employ
Business Consultants as accountant.

The firm's services include payroll services, tax preparation, cash
flow analysis and projections, and the preparation of reports,
balance statements profit and loss statements.

The firm will be paid $200 per month for routine accounting and
payroll services, and $100 per hour for additional services.

Jeffrey Brown, a partner at Business Consultants, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

              About Two's Company Restaurant & Lounge

Two's Company Restaurant & Lounge, LLC filed a petition for Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Wisc. Case No. 21-12177) on Oct. 22,
2021, listing up to $500,000 in assets and up to $1 million in
liabilities. The Debtor is represented by Goyke & Tillisch, LLP.


UNITI GROUP: Posts $43.7 Million Net Income in Third Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Uniti Group Inc. reported net income of $43.68 million on $266.75
million of total revenues for the three months ended Sept. 30,
2021, compared to net income of $7.46 million on $258.77 million of
total revenues for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported net
income of $88.82 million on $807.51 million of total revenues
compared to a net loss of $671.14 million on $791.75 million of
total revenues for the same period during the prior year.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $4.78 billion in total
assets, $6.90 billion in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $2.12 billion.

At quarter-end, the Company had approximately $450 million of
unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, and undrawn borrowing
availability under its revolving credit agreement.  The Company's
leverage ratio at quarter-end was 5.76x based on Net Debt to
Annualized Adjusted EBITDA.

On Nov. 4, 2021, the Company's Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per common share, payable on
Jan. 3, 2022, to stockholders of record on Dec. 17, 2021.

"Uniti continues to perform exceptionally well as evidenced by the
second consecutive quarter of consolidated bookings of
approximately $1.0 million in monthly recurring revenue,
representing an increase of 90% from consolidated bookings in the
third quarter of 2020.  We continue to emphasize driving high
margin recurring revenue while managing our capital intensity and
industry leading monthly churn levels of 0.3%," commented Kenny
Gunderman, president and chief executive officer.

Mr. Gunderman continued, "Given these trends along with lower than
expected operational costs, and the impact of our recent unsecured
notes issuance, we are revising the mid-point of our full year 2021
outlook ranges."

A full-text copy of the press release is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001620280/000156459021054258/unit-ex991_26.htm

                            About Uniti

Headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, Uniti --
http://www.uniti.com-- is an internally managed real estate
investment trust.  It is engaged in the acquisition and
construction of mission critical communications infrastructure, and
is a provider of wireless infrastructure solutions for the
communications industry.  As of September 30, 2021, Uniti owns
approximately 126,000 fiber route miles, 7.5 million fiber strand
miles, and other communications real estate throughout the United
States.

Uniti Group reported a net loss of $718.81 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to net income of $10.91 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$4.75 billion in total assets, $6.88 billion in total liabilities,
and a total shareholders' deficit of $2.13 billion.

                            *   *   *

In March 2020, S&P Global Ratings placed all ratings on U.S.
telecom REIT Uniti Group Inc., including the 'CCC-' issuer credit
rating, on CreditWatch with positive implications.  The CreditWatch
placement follows the company's announcement it reached an
agreement in principle with its largest tenant Windstream Holdings
Inc. to resolve all legal claims it asserted against Uniti in the
context of Windstream's bankruptcy proceedings.


URBAN ONE: Posts $13.9 Million Net Income in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------
Urban One, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing consolidated net
income attributable to common stockholders of $13.88 million on
$111.46 million of net revenue for the three months ended Sept. 30,
2021, compared to a consolidated net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $12.77 million on $91.91 million of net revenue for
the three months ended Sept. 30, 2020.

For the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2021, the Company reported
consolidated net income attributable to common stockholders of
$31.75 million on $310.50 million of net revenue compared to a
consolidated net loss attributable to common stockholders of $34.54
million on $262.80 million of net revenue for the nine months ended
Sept. 30, 2020.

As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company had $1.24 billion in total
assets, $972.37 million in total liabilities, $17.02 million in
redeemable noncontrolling interests, and $248.15 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Alfred C. Liggins, III, Urban One's CEO and president stated, "We
had another very strong quarter, driven by double-digit advertising
revenue growth in core radio, digital and Cable TV.  Our digital
and national syndication businesses are benefiting from continued
high demand from major advertisers for our audience on a national
level, and our core radio business, excluding political, increased
by approximately 35% year over year.  Our diversified mix of assets
has helped us rebound to Adjusted EBITDA levels that exceed those
of 2019, and I now feel comfortable increasing full year guidance
to in the $140 - $145 million range, up from the mid $130s.  Our
Richmond, Virginia, One Casino and Resort project was narrowly
defeated in the city referendum on November 2nd, which was both
unexpected and disappointing given the substantial economic
benefits we believe the project would have brought to the city.  We
are considering our next steps and will continue to pursue similar
opportunities."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001041657/000155837021014535/uone-20210930x10q.htm

                          About Urban One

Headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland, Urban One, Inc. (together
with its subsidiaries) -- www.urban1.com -- is an urban-oriented,
multi-media company that primarily targets African-American and
urban consumers.  The Company's core business is its radio
broadcasting franchise which is the largest radio broadcasting
operation that primarily targets African-American and urban
listeners.  As of Sept. 30, 2021, the Company owned and/or operated
63 independently formatted, revenue producing broadcast stations
(including 54 FM or AM stations, 7 HD stations, and the 2 low power
television stations it operates) branded under the tradename "Radio
One" in 13 urban markets in the United States.  Through its
controlling interest in Reach Media, Inc. (blackamericaweb.com),
the Company also operates syndicated programming including the
Rickey Smiley Morning Show, the Russ Parr Morning Show and the DL
Hughley Show.

Urban One received notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. that
as a result of the resignation of Geoffrey Armstrong as a director
of the Company effective Nov. 23, 2020 the Company was no longer in
compliance with Nasdaq's audit committee requirements as set forth
in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605 since Mr. Armstrong had been a
member of the audit committee.

Urban One reported a consolidated net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $8.11 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020.  As
of March 31, 2021, the Company had $1.17 billion in total assets,
$957.19 million in total liabilities, $12.74 million in redeemable
noncontrolling interests, and $198.83 million in total
stockholders' equity.


VINE ENERGY: Moody's Hikes Rating on Senior Unsecured Notes to B1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Vine Energy Holdings LLC's (VEH)
senior unsecured notes rating to B1 from B3 following the
completion[1] of Chesapeake Energy Corporation's (Chesapeake)
acquisition of Vine Energy Inc. (VEI), the parent company of VEH.
Concurrently, Moody's withdrew VEH's B2 Corporate Family Rating and
its B2-PD Probability of Default Rating. Following the consummation
of the merger, Chesapeake legally assumed VEH's senior unsecured
notes. This rating action concludes the review of VEH's ratings
initiated on August 11, 2021.

Upgrade:

Issuer: Vine Energy Holdings LLC

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Upgraded to B1 (LGD4)
from B3 (LGD4)

Withdrawals:

Issuer: Vine Energy Holdings LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn from B2

Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn from B2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Withdrawn from SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Vine Energy Holdings LLC

Outlook, Stable From Rating Under Review

RATINGS RATIONALE

Through the execution of supplemental indentures, Chesapeake has
legally assumed VEH's senior unsecured notes due 2029 and provided
subsidiary guarantees making the VEH senior notes pari passu with
Chesapeake's outstanding senior notes. As a result the VEH senior
notes were upgraded to B1 from B3 , the same rating as Chesapeake's
senior notes. Chesapeake repaid all of VEH's other debts
outstanding, and therefore VEH's CFR and PDR were withdrawn.

Chesapeake's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating (CFR) reflects its large,
low-cost natural gas positions in the Marcellus and Haynesville
shale plays, low financial leverage following its restructuring and
the ability to generate significant free cash flow at most points
in the natural gas price cycle. The acquisition of Vine boosts
Chesapeake's scale in its Haynesville operations and provides
opportunities for transportation and operating efficiencies,
further strengthening the company's position in that basin and
solidifying its operations there as a second major asset
underpinning its strategic shift to a natural gas focus. The
moderately leveraging acquisition of Vine, while positive for
Chesapeake's credit profile, does not affect its ratings.
Chesapeake's oilier South Texas, Brazos Valley and Powder River
assets provide attractive oil optionality in an environment in
which oil prices are sustainably greater than $60/bbl. Moody's has
historically viewed Chesapeake's financial policy as aggressive,
though many of the actions it took in recent years were
necessitated by its then burdensome debt load.

Chesapeake's senior notes are rated B1, one notch beneath the
company's Ba3 CFR, reflecting the notes' junior priority claim on
assets to borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the
large size of the secured revolver, relative to the notes.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Chesapeake's ratings could be upgraded if the company can achieve
production growth while maintaining a Leveraged Full-Cycle Ratio
above 1.5x. Ratings could be downgraded if Leveraged Full-Cycle
Ratio falls below 1x, RCF/debt falls toward 30%, or if the company
returns to materially outspending cash flow.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production published in August 2021.

Vine Energy Holdings LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Cheseapeake Energy Corporation. Chesapeake is based in Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma and is a large independent exploration and
production (E&P) company operating in several onshore US basins.


W.R. GRACE: Moody's Assigns B1 Rating to Senior Secured Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a B1 rating to W.R. Grace
Holdings LLC's (Grace) 5.625% senior secured notes due 2024 and
4.875% senior secured notes due 2027 following the completion of
the exchange offer for the 5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2024
and 4.875% senior unsecured notes due 2027. W.R. Grace Holdings
LLC's B2 Corporate Family Rating B2-PD Probability of Default
Rating, B1 rating on the first lien senior secured term loan due
2028, B1 rating on the senior secured revolving credit facility
maturing 2026 and B3 rating on the senior unsecured notes due 2029
remain unchanged. The outlook is stable.

The ratings on W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., including the Ba3 CFR,
Ba3-PD and B1 ratings for the negligible amount of the remaining,
unexchanged senior unsecured notes have been withdrawn as the first
lien debt has been repaid following the completion of the merger.

"The rating assigned to the secured notes reflects the conclusion
of the exchange offer and their improved position in the capital
structure as they now share the collateral package with the first
lien credit facilities," said Domenick R. Fumai, Moody's Vice
President and lead analyst for W.R. Grace Holdings LLC.

Assignments:

Issuer: W.R. Grace Holdings LLC

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Grace's B2 rating is constrained by Moody's expectations that
although leverage will decline from current levels, it will remain
elevated. The rating further incorporates Moody's view that Grace
will maintain an aggressive financial policy under its new owners,
which includes a willingness to incur debt to fund strategic
acquisitions and prioritize shareholder-friendly activities. The
rating factors modest business diversity with a significant
emphasis on catalysts, though Moody's believes the acquisition of
Fine Chemistry Services and strategic tuck-in acquisitions in
Material Technologies will further reduce its dependence on
catalysts.

The B2 rating is supported by strong market positions in several
key end markets, including the leader in the global refining
catalysts and polyolefin catalyst industries, specialty silica
gels, and independent polypropylene licensing technologies. Grace's
rating is further underpinned by significant R&D capabilities and
favorable industry prospects due to increased global environmental
regulations and policies, a focus on sustainability initiatives, as
well as positive demographic trends. Grace's business profile also
benefits from high barriers to entry, a good operating track record
with attractive EBITDA margins, and the ability to generate free
cash flow through economic cycles compared to a number of
comparably rated peers in the chemical industry. The rating also
considers the company's good liquidity position.

Grace has a good liquidity profile to support operations in the
near term, including approximately $312 million of balance sheet
cash and roughly $392 million of availability under its $450
million revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2021. Moody's does
expect Grace to maintain more moderate cash balances going forward,
though this is partially mitigated by expectations that the
proposed $450 million revolving credit facility will remain largely
undrawn.

The debt capital structure is comprised of a first lien term loan,
first lien senior secured revolving credit facility, 5.625% senior
secured notes due 2024, 4.875% senior secured notes due 2027 and
5.625% senior unsecured notes due 2029. The B1 ratings on the first
lien term loan, revolving credit facility and senior secured notes,
one notch above the B2 CFR, reflect a first lien position on
substantially all assets and priority ranking in the event of
default. The B3 rating on the senior unsecured notes, one notch
below the CFR, indicates their subordination as a result of the
significant amount of first lien debt in the capital structure.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Moody's has factored environmental, social and governance risks in
Moody's assessment of W.R. Grace's credit profile. Similar to many
specialty chemical companies, Grace has high environmental risk.
Grace's estimated liability related to legacy environmental
response costs totaled approximately $109 million as of December
31, 2020. On the other hand, social risks are considered low to
average. Grace has made significant investments including research
and development of products such as catalysts that are beneficial
to reducing emissions. A growing percentage of the company's sales
are tied to sustainability objectives and are positive for both
environmental and social causes. Grace is also focusing on
incorporating sustainability into their own operations, with
strategic initiatives to lower greenhouse gas emissions by 22%,
reduce water consumption by 10% and waste by 5% from a 2019
baseline by 2030. Governance risks are above average as Grace will
become a private company with a lack of a majority of independent
board members, will not be required to file public financial
statements and will be controlled by new owners that have an
aggressive financial policy.

The stable outlook assumes that Grace will successfully de-lever
over the next 2-3 years as profitability recovers and the Fine
Chemistry Services acquisition is efficiently integrated
contributing to additional revenue and EBITDA. Moody's also expects
Grace to maintain a good liquidity position during the rating
horizon.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade is unlikely at this time, but Moody's could upgrade the
rating with expectations for adjusted financial leverage sustained
near 5.5x (Debt/EBITDA), retained cash flow-to-debt sustained above
15% (RCF/Debt) and more balanced financial policies that include
gross debt reduction and a commitment from its owners to a more
conservative financial policy. An upgrade would also assume a
reduction in event risk such that the size of future acquisitions
would not raise pro forma leverage meaningfully above 5.0x for a
sustained period.

Moody's could downgrade the rating with expectations for adjusted
financial leverage sustained above 6.5x, or retained cash
flow-to-debt sustained below 10%, a significant deterioration in
the company's liquidity position, or another large debt-financed
acquisition or dividend to shareholders.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemical
Industry published in March 2019.

Headquartered in Columbia, MD, W.R. Grace Holdings LLC is the
parent of W.R. Grace & Co., a manufacturer of specialty chemicals
and materials operating and/or selling in over 60 countries. The
company has two reporting segments: Catalysts Technologies and
Materials Technologies. Catalysts Technologies is a globally
diversified business that includes refining, polyolefin and
chemicals catalysts. Materials Technologies includes specialty
materials such as silica-based and silica-alumina-based materials
used in consumer/pharmaceutical, chemical processes and coatings
applications. On April 26, 2021 W.R. Grace agreed to be acquired by
Standard Industries Holdings Inc. for $7.0 billion. Grace generated
approximately $1.73 billion of sales for the year ended December
31, 2020.


YUNHONG CTI: Closes Redemption of Equity Interest in Flexo
----------------------------------------------------------
As previously reported by Yunhong CTI Ltd. in its Current Report on
Form 8-K dated Aug. 5, 2021, on July 30, 2021, the company entered
into an agreement whereby it agreed to the redemption of all of its
equity interests in Flexo Universal S DE RL DE CV, a Mexican
corporation, in a transaction whereby the buyer Kingman
Distributions, S.A. DE C.V, a Mexican corporation would become the
majority owner of Flexo.

The transaction closed on Oct. 28, 2021.  At closing, Flexo
purchased and redeemed all of the company's equity interests in
Flexo in return for a purchase price of $500,000, of which $100,000
was paid at the closing of the transaction, and the remainder will
be paid in installments over 12 months following the closing date.
The installment obligations are secured by a pledge of the assets
of Flexo, as well as by guaranties provided by Kingman and Pablo
Gortazar, an individual with an ownership interest in Flexo,
pursuant to a Guaranty and Security Agreement entered into among
Yunhong, Kingman, Flexo and Mr. Gortazar at the closing.

                         About Yunhong CTI

Lake Barrington, Illinois-based Yunhong CTI Ltd. --
www.ctiindustries.com -- develops, produces, distributes and sells
a number of consumer products throughout the United States and in
over 30 other countries, and it produces film products for
commercial and industrial uses in the United States.  Many of the
Company's products utilize flexible films and, for a number of
years, it has been a leading developer of innovative products which
employ flexible films including novelty balloons, pouches and films
for commercial packaging applications.

Yunhong CTI reported a net loss of $4.25 million for the 12 months
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $8.07 million for
the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the
Company had $24.48 million in total assets, $18.22 million in total
liabilities, and $6.26 million in total shareholders' equity.

New York, NY-based RBSM LLP, the Company's auditor since 2019,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 15, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and will require additional capital to
continue as a going concern.  In addition, the Company is in
violation of certain covenants agreed to with PNC Bank which if not
resolved could result in PNC Bank initiating liquidation
proceedings.  This raises substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


[*] Commercial Chapter 11 Filings Up 21.1% in October 2021
----------------------------------------------------------
Epiq, a global leader in legal services, released its October 2021
bankruptcy filing statistics from its AACER bankruptcy information
services business. October new filings for all chapters increased
1.8% to 31,471, up from 30,920 in September 2021. Total individual
Chapter 13 filings were up 8.6% over September, with 10,764 new
filings compared to 9,909 filings in September 2021. Total
individual Chapter 7 filings were down 1.9% over September, with
18,874 new filings compared to 19,942 in the prior month.  

"Although October had one less business day than September, October
2021 filings were up 1.8% month-over-month. However, new filings
remain significantly lower than the comparable pre-COVID number of
67,878 for all chapter new filings in October 2019," said Chris
Kruse, senior vice president of Epiq AACER.

Chapter 13 individual filings increased for the fifth consecutive
month, growing 33% since May 2021 when 8,079 new cases were filed.
However, these filing rates remain 55% below the comparable 23,688
pre-COVID new filings in October 2019.

The five states leading the October individual Chapter 13 new
filings include Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, and
Illinois.

Total Commercial Chapter 11 filings in October increased by 21.1%
with a total of 293, compared to 242 new filings in September 2021.
As a subset of the total new Chapter 11 commercial filings, Chapter
11 Subchapter V filings were up 16.7% with 84 new filings, compared
to 72 new filings in September 2021.

                         About Epiq AACER

Epiq AACER is your partner for bankruptcy information and
compliance. Its AACER bankruptcy information services platform is
built with superior data, technology and expertise to create
insight and mitigate risk for businesses impacted by bankruptcies.
It offers free bankruptcy statistics and monthly email updates for
both commercial and non-commercial consumer bankruptcy filings for
Chapter 7, Chapter 11 and Chapter 13 cases.

                            About Epiq

Epiq, a global technology-enabled services leader to the legal
services industry and corporations, takes on large-scale,
increasingly complex tasks for corporate counsel, law firms, and
business professionals with efficiency, clarity, and confidence.
Clients rely on Epiq to streamline the administration of business
operations, class action and mass tort, court reporting,
eDiscovery, regulatory, compliance, restructuring, and bankruptcy
matters. Epiq subject-matter experts and technologies create
efficiency through expertise and deliver confidence to
high-performing clients around the world. Learn more at
https://www.epiqglobal.com.



[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week of November 1 to 5, 2021
-------------------------------------------------------

  Company                  Ticker    Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                  ------    ------ ---------   --------
BPZ Resources Inc          BPZR       6.500     3.017   3/1/2049
Basic Energy Services Inc  BASX      10.750     7.250 10/15/2023
Basic Energy Services Inc  BASX      10.750    15.125 10/15/2023
Buffalo Thunder
  Development Authority    BUFLO     11.000    50.000  12/9/2022
Carlson Travel Inc         CARLTV    11.500     3.022 12/15/2026
Carlson Travel Inc         CARLTV    11.500    34.500 12/15/2026
Endo Finance LLC           ENDP       5.750    92.875  1/15/2022
Endo Finance LLC           ENDP       5.750    94.095  1/15/2022
Energy Conversion Devices  ENER       3.000     7.875  6/15/2013
Energy Future Competitive
  Holdings Co LLC          TXU        0.943     0.072  1/30/2037
Flexential
  Intermediate Corp        PEAKTE    11.250   108.625   8/1/2024
Flexential
  Intermediate Corp        PEAKTE    11.250   108.375   8/1/2024
GNC Holdings Inc           GNC        1.500     1.250  8/15/2020
GTT Communications Inc     GTTN       7.875    11.064 12/31/2024
GTT Communications Inc     GTTN       7.875    10.250 12/31/2024
Goodman Networks Inc       GOODNT     8.000    38.000  5/11/2022
MAI Holdings Inc           MAIHLD     9.500    19.090   6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc           MAIHLD     9.500    19.125   6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc           MAIHLD     9.500    19.090   6/1/2023
MBIA Insurance Corp        MBI       11.384    11.500  1/15/2033
MBIA Insurance Corp        MBI       11.384    10.202  1/15/2033
MF Global Holdings Ltd     MF         9.000    15.625  6/20/2038
MF Global Holdings Ltd     MF         6.750    15.625   8/8/2016
Nine Energy Service Inc    NINE       8.750    53.615  11/1/2023
Nine Energy Service Inc    NINE       8.750    52.931  11/1/2023
Nine Energy Service Inc    NINE       8.750    52.931  11/1/2023
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC       OMX        5.540     0.829  1/29/2020
Renco Metals Inc           RENCO     11.500    24.875   7/1/2003
Revlon Consumer
  Products Corp            REV        6.250    44.753   8/1/2024
Riverbed Technology Inc    RVBD       8.875    67.500   3/1/2023
Riverbed Technology Inc    RVBD       8.875    67.500   3/1/2023
Rolta LLC                  RLTAIN    10.750     1.121  5/16/2018
Sears Holdings Corp        SHLD       6.625     0.955 10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp        SHLD       6.625     1.613 10/15/2018
Sears Roebuck Acceptance   SHLD       7.500     1.160 10/15/2027
Sears Roebuck Acceptance   SHLD       6.750     1.096  1/15/2028
Sears Roebuck Acceptance   SHLD       7.000     1.091   6/1/2032
Sears Roebuck Acceptance   SHLD       6.500     1.086  12/1/2028
Sempra Texas Holdings      TXU        5.550    13.500 11/15/2014
Talen Energy Supply LLC    TLN        4.600    97.184 12/15/2021
TerraVia Holdings Inc      TVIA       5.000     4.644  10/1/2019



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***