/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/211006.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, October 6, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 278

                            Headlines

1116 MAPLE STREET: Taps Benedon & Serlin as Appellate Counsel
2724 OCEAN BLVD: Taps The Agency as Real Estate Broker
ACCO BRANDS: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Remains Stable
ATHEROTECH INC: Supreme Court Turns Down Dispute vs. Trustee
BARETTA INC: Seeks Court Approval to Hire GRS Appraisal

BARTLEY INDUSTRIES: Lender Seeks to Prohibit Cash Collateral Use
BLUE TREE: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT IDRs, Outlook Remains Stable
BLUEBERRY COMMONS: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
BROADSTREET PARTNERS: S&P Rates $332.5MM 1st-Lien Term Loan 'B'
BRODIE HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors

BROOKS AUTOMATION: S&P Places 'BB-' ICR on CreditWatch Developing
BUZZ FINCO: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT IDR & Alters Outlook to Stable
BYRNA TECHNOLOGIES: Appoints Emily Rooney as Director
CALPLANT I LLC: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
CARNIVAL CORP: Delays Debt Reckoning by Refinancing Bonds

CARNIVAL CORP: S&P Assigns 'BB-' Rating on First-Lien Term Loan
CASTLELAKE AVIATION: S&P Assigns 'B+' Rating on Sr. Unsec. Notes
CHIMNEY PASTURES: Unsecureds Will Get 100% of Claims in 36 Months
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC: Fitch Raises IDRs to 'BB-', Outlook Positive
CMA LOGISTICS: Unsecureds to Get 100% of Profit from 20 Quarters

CRC BROADCASTING: Gets Interim Cash Access Until Oct 31
DAISEY LLC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
DALTON CRANE: Seeks to Hire Martin & Drought as Legal Counsel
DAVEY KENT: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 2% in Plan
DELTA AIR: Supreme Court Declines Pilots' Benefits Case vs. PBGC

DENARDO CAPITAL: Gets OK to Hire Rosewood as Real Estate Advisor
DENARDO CAPITAL: Oct. 14 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
DETOUR PLUMBING: Seeks to Hire Anand Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
E.L. SERVICES INC: Seeks to Hire Vaught & Boutris as Accountant
EG GLOBAL: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors

EG VENTURES: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
ELITE AVIATION: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
ELITE ENGINEERING: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
ELITE METAL: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
ENSEMBLE RCM: S&P Places 'B' ICR on Watch Positive on Announced IPO

ESSA PHARMA: Registers 7.3M Shares Under 2021 Incentive Plan
EXPRESS GRAIN: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
EXTRUSION GROUP: Case Summary & 14 Unsecured Creditors
EYECARE PARTNERS: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR on Acquisition Agreement
FORD STEEL: Nov. 2 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set

FOREVER 21: Case Dismissed After Lawyers Agree to Waive Fees
FORTEM RESOURCES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE: Fitch Assigns 'BB+' IDR, Outlook Stable
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Rates New 2nd-Lien Sec. Notes 'CCC+'
GREATER WORKS: Seeks to Hire KW Atlanta Partners as Broker

GREENSILL CAPITAL: Credit Suisseā€™s Zurich Offices Raided in Probe
GROW CAPITAL: Delays Form 10-K Filing to Complete Audit
GRUPO AEROMEXICO: Presents Plan, Disclosures to U.S. Court
HI CRUSH: Winternitz Completes Liquidation of Surplus Assets
HOME4FAMILIES LLC: Unsecured Creditors Will Get 2.86% of Claims

ILLINOIS CENTER: $255MM Loan Placed on Servicer Watchlist
ILLINOIS STAR: 800 Bldg. Valued at $1.5MM, Mall at $1.65MM
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS: Discontinues Pillphone Messaging Platform
INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES: Extends Notes Maturity to Oct. 31
INVO BIOSCIENCE: Signs $2M Stock Purchase Agreement With Paradigm

IPC CORP: S&P Cuts ICR to 'SD' Following Restructuring Agreement
J&J ROBINSON: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
JHW ALPHIA: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B-' ICR
JUAREZ BROTHERS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
KATERRA INC: Bankruptcy Judge Stops Greensill's Move for UK Lawsuit

LEHMAN BROTHERS: Dispute Goes On as Deutsche Makes Legal Bid
LEHMAN BROTHERS: Payouts to Unsecured Creditors Now at $128.9BB
LUX AMBER: Incurs $1.98M Net Loss in Fiscal Year Ended April 30
MADDOX FOUNDRY: Nov. 10 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
MAINSTREET PIER: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 20

MALLINCKRODT PLC: Lawyer Says Bondholders Concerned and Frustrated
MARKEL CATCO: Chapter 15 Case Summary
MARRIOTT HOUSTON WESTCHASE: Value of Collateral Continues to Drop
MARTIN FINANCIAL: Seeks to Hire Kelley & Clements as Legal Counsel
MATADOR RESOURCES: Fitch Gives FirstTime 'B+' IDR, Outlook Stable

MCAFEE LLC: Fitch Hikes Rating on Secured Credit Facility to 'BB+'
MCCLATCHY CO: Borello Test Should Be Used in Carriers' Class Suit
MCK USA 1: Seeks to Hire Related ISG Realty as Broker
MEADE INSTRUMENTS: Sheppard Mullin Agrees to Pay $4.45 Million
MORGAN STANLEY 2013-C10: Fitch Lowers Class H Certs Rating to 'C'

NEUBASE THERAPEUTICS: Signs Separation Agreement With CFO
NEXTERA ENERGY: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDRs, Outlook Stable
NSM TOP HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg., Affirms 'B' ICR
OZOP ENERGY: To Sell $30 Million Worth of Securities
PARALLAX HEALTH: Appoints Sonia Choi as Interim CEO

PARETEUM CORP: Incurs $6.6M Net Loss in Quarter Ended March 31
PARETEUM CORP: To Evaluate Strategic Alternatives
PENNSYLVANIA ECONOMIC: Fitch Affirms BB- on $114MM Parking Bonds
PHI GROUP: Changes Subsidiary Name to Empire Spirits, Inc.
PHI GROUP: Forms Asia Diamond Exchange, Inc. Subsidiary

POST OAK: Seeks to Hire KapilaMukamal as Financial Advisor
POST OAK: Seeks to Hire Leon Cosgrove as Bankruptcy Counsel
POST OAK: Seeks to Hire Morris Nichols as Bankruptcy Co-Counsel
QDOS INC: Justices Pass on Involuntary Bankruptcy Dismissal Fight
QUANTUM CORP: Registers 5.9 Million Shares Under 2012 LTIP

QURATE RETAIL: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LongTerm IDRs, Outlook Stable
REDWOOD EMPIRE: May Use Cash Collateral Thru Nov 18
ROARK & ASSOCIATES: Seeks Approval to Hire Bankruptcy Attorneys
ROCHELLE HOLDINGS: Ordered to Revise Plan & Disclosures by Oct. 8
SAMURAI MARTIAL: Unsecured Creditors Will Get $45K in 60 Months

SILGAN HOLDINGS: Fitch's 'BB+' IDR Removed From UCO Status
SK FOODS: California Court Dismisses Four in One Suit
SOUTH COAST BEHAVIORAL: Nov. 22 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
STATERA BIOPHARMA: Turner Stone Replaces Meaden & Moore as Auditor
TALI CORP: Unsecured Creditors to Get Share of Income for 5 Years

TENRGYS LLC: Nov. 9 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
TERRAFORM POWER: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
THOR INDUSTRIES: S&P Rates New $400MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
TIMESHARE TERMINATION: False Advertising Suit Halted by Filing
USA GYMNASTICS: Defeats Bankruptcy Plan Vote Challenge of Insurer

VENOCO LLC: Supreme Court Denies CA Appeal of Trustee Taking Suit
WA INC: Seeks to Hire Goering & Goering as Bankruptcy Counsel
WEST C BUILDERS: May Use Cadence Bank Cash Collateral
WILLCO X DEVELOPMENT: Taps Mitchell Hoffman as Expert Witness
WILLCO X: Gets OK to Hire John Smiley as Expert Witness

WILSON GOMER: Claims Will be Paid From Continued Operations
WINDSTREAM HOLDINGS: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Vendor Appeal
ZACH HALOPOFF: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
ZNB LLP: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
[*] Carl Marks Advisors Bags Three M&A Advisor Turnaround Awards

[*] Commercial Chapter 11 Filings Down 6% in September 2021
[*] Judge Guy Cole Jr. to Receive American Inns of Court Award
[] B.Riley Adds Three Senior Executives to Restructuring Division
[] Byron Moldo Named Geneva's Restructuring Group Chief
[] John Chun Joins Herrick Feinstein's Restructuring Department


                            *********

1116 MAPLE STREET: Taps Benedon & Serlin as Appellate Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
1116 Maple Street, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to hire Benedon &
Serlin, LLP as its appellate counsel.

The Debtor requires legal assistance in connection with a district
court appeal of two separate orders issued by the bankruptcy court
in the adversary proceeding bearing case number 2:20-ap-01622-BR.

The firm's hourly rates for commercial litigation range from $650
to $205.

Benedon & Serlin received a post-petition retainer from the Debtor
in the aggregate amount of $25,000.

Gerald Serlin, Esq., a partner at Benedon & Serlin, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm neither holds nor represents an interest
adverse to the Debtor.

The firm can be reached through:

     Gerald Serlin, Esq.
     Benedon & Serlin, LLP
     22708 Mariano Street
     Woodland Hills, CA 91367-6128
     Phone: (818) 340-1950
    
                      About 1116 Maple Street

1116 Maple Street, LLC, is a single asset real estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  It has 100 percent fee
interest in a property located at 1116 East Maple St., Glendale,
Calif., valued by the Debtor at $5 million.

1116 Maple Street filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 20-16362) on July 14, 2020, listing
$5,057,759 in assets and $4,871,355 in liabilities.  Mihran
Tcholakian, managing member, signed the petition.  Judge Barry
Russell oversees the case.  Margulies Faith LLP is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


2724 OCEAN BLVD: Taps The Agency as Real Estate Broker
------------------------------------------------------
2724 Ocean Blvd, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California to employ The Agency as its
broker.

The Debtor requires the assistance of a broker to list and market
its real property located at 2724 Ocean Blvd., Corona Del Mar,
Calif.  The initial listing price is $29.5 million.

The Agency will be paid a commission of 5 percent of the gross
sales price.

Stephen Perkins and Michael Caruso, real estate brokers at The
Agency, disclosed in a court filing that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The Agency can be reached at:

     Stephen Perkins
     Michael Caruso
     The Agency
     331 Foothill Rd., Suite 100
     Beverly Hills, CA 90210
     Tel: (424) 400-5915
     Email: james@theagencyre.com

                     About 2724 Ocean Blvd LLC

2724 Ocean Blvd, LLC is a California limited liability company
formed on July 6, 2017.  Formerly known as 505 N. Santa Fe, LLC,
the Debtor was formed originally for the purpose of developing the
real property located at 505 N. Santa Fe, Vista, Calif.  Instead,
the Debtor purchased the real property located at 2724 Ocean
Boulevard, Corona Del Mar, Calif.  On Jan. 11, 2018, the Debtor's
name was changed to 2724 Ocean Blvd, LLC.

2724 Ocean Blvd filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 20-12027) on July 20, 2020,
listing as much as $50 million in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Mark S. Wallace oversees the case.  Jeffrey I. Golden, Esq.,
at Weiland Golden Goodrich LLP, serves as the Debtor's legal
counsel.


ACCO BRANDS: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Remains Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) of ACCO Brands Corporation at 'BB'. The Rating Outlook
remains Stable.

Fitch has applied its updated recovery rating criteria and has
upgraded ACCO's senior secured revolving credit facility and term
loan, which is co-borrowed by ACCO Brands Australia Holding Pty
Limited, to 'BBB-'/'RR1' from 'BB+'/'RR1', and has affirmed the
senior unsecured notes at 'BB'/'RR4'. The ratings have been removed
from Under Criteria Observation, where they were placed following
the publication of the updated recovery ratings criteria on April
9, 2021.

ACCO's ratings reflect the company's historically consistent FCF
and reasonable gross leverage, which trended around 3.0x prior to
operating challenges in 2020 related to the coronavirus pandemic.
The ratings are constrained by secular challenges in the office
products industry and channel shifts within the company's customer
mix, as well as the risk of further debt-financed acquisitions into
faster-growing geographies and product categories.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Coronavirus Pandemic: ACCO has seen a significant decline in demand
for its products since the start of the pandemic due to remote work
and education arrangements. Revenue in 2020 declined approximately
15% to $1.66 billion from $1.96 billion in 2019 and 1H21 revenue
excluding PowerA remains down 11% on a two-year basis. The company
has demonstrated good cost control, with operating expenses down
approximately 14% in 2020 yielding an EBITDA decline of 30% in
2020.

Fitch expects ACCO's base business to rebound somewhat in 2H21 as
remote work and education arrangements subside. However, acceptance
of remote work arrangements longer term could limit ACCO's ability
to fully rebound to pre-2020 revenue levels. Fitch projects ACCO's
sales (prior to the impact of the PowerA acquisition) could improve
around 7.5% to $1.8 billion with EBITDA rebounding toward $230
million, up from $205 million in 2020, while consolidated sales and
EBITDA could reach $2.0 billion and $290 million respectively.
Revenue and EBITDA growth could be modestly positive in 2022. FCF
could remain around $125 million annually as EBITDA growth is
mitigated by higher taxes and capex. Fitch expects FCF to be
directed towards debt reduction though the company may also resume
share repurchases in the near term.

Limited Organic Industry Growth: The office products industry is
experiencing a slow secular decline in mature markets due to a
shift toward digital technologies, partially offset by growth in
emerging markets. ACCO is also managing a continued shift in
channel revenue away from traditional office product superstores
such as Staples and Office Depot and traditional office supply
wholesalers towards discounters, e-commerce retailers and the
independent channel. These customers have also increased their
direct sourcing efforts to grow private label penetration, creating
more competition for ACCO's largely branded product portfolio. The
potential for greater remote work arrangements longer term creates
new headwinds for many of ACCO's business lines.

While ACCO benefits from its market-leading position, the company
has been affected by industry pressures. ACCO's U.S. revenue (43.0%
of net revenue in 2019) declined 1.5% on a four-year CAGR basis in
2015-2019; operating income declines were modestly higher at 3.6%.
Fitch expects flattish to modestly negative growth will continue
over the medium term, after the near-term impacts of the
coronavirus pandemic.

Acquisitions Drive Growth and Diversification: Given secular
challenges in some of ACCO's primary categories and markets, the
company has acquired several businesses over the last few years to
capitalize on growth in new markets and faster-growing adjacent
categories. The acquisitions have contributed to ACCO's revenue
growth, margin expansion due to greater scale and improved
geographic and customer diversity. The December 2020 acquisition of
PowerA is an example of ACCO adding a higher-growth category to its
business portfolio.

Strong Expense and Balance Sheet Management: ACCO maintains a tight
focus on its cost structure, which has enabled the company to
improve profitability in a difficult operating environment. In the
U.S., the company continues to reallocate sales efforts to
higher-margin independent retailers (who tend to sell
higher-price-point, higher-margin products but have a higher cost
to serve as well) and away from the declining, lower-margin office
superstore channel. Meanwhile, the company's selling, general &
administrative expense margin has remained relatively steady in the
low-19% range in recent years despite sluggish organic growth and
fixed cost inflation. The company's ongoing focus on cost
reductions has protected EBITDA in the face of its top-line
challenges.

ACCO's good balance sheet management is a positive factor in its
credit profile. While the company occasionally makes debt-financed
acquisitions to optimize its portfolio, the company has
demonstrated a willingness to manage its leverage through debt
reduction following a transaction, in line with its public
commitment to maintain net debt to EBITDA around 2.5x (similar on a
gross leverage basis given minimal cash balances). Over the four
years prior to 2020, gross leverage has trended at 3.0x, with
approximately $100 million of debt reduction in 2018/2019 following
the debt-financed Esselte acquisition in 2017.

Supply Chain Pressures Manageable: ACCO has experienced supply
chain pressures in 2021 plaguing much of the consumer products
industry including material shortages, elongated lead times,
commodity price inflation as well as elevated shipping costs given
60% of the company's revenues are derived from products
manufactured outside the region where sales are generated. While
3Q21 margins are likely to be pressured by the sharp rise in prices
and supply chain disruptions, Fitch expects price increases
implemented towards the end of the quarter to support margins
starting in 4Q21.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

ACCO's 'BB'/Stable rating reflects the company's good position in
the global office and business products industry. The ratings are
constrained by secular challenges in the office products industry
in North America, Europe and Australia. The company has taken steps
over the last few years to manage costs given pressures on U.S.
organic growth and has executed well on diversifying its customer
base toward higher-growth, higher-margin channels in North America
as well as acquisitions in better-performing categories and
international markets. The rating also reflects ACCO's good balance
sheet management, which has led to gross leverage trending around
3.0x over time. Including a full-year contribution from the PowerA
acquisition, Fitch projects 2021 gross leverage could trend in the
high-3x, below Fitch's downgrade sensitivity of 4.0x.

ACCO is similarly rated to Spectrum Brands, Inc. (BB/Rating Watch
Positive), Central Garden and Pet Company (BB/Stable) and a notch
below Tempur Sealy (BB+/Stable) and Newell Brands (BB+/Stable).

Spectrum Brands, Inc.'s current 'BB' rating reflects the company's
diversified portfolio and historical track record of maintaining
gross leverage around 4.0x. The rating also reflects expectations
for modest long-term organic revenue growth, reasonable
profitability and positive FCF. The Positive Watch follows the
proposed sale of the company's Hardware and Home Improvement
business, which represents around 40% of EBITDA, and Fitch's
expectations that gross leverage could trend in the mid-2x range
following the sale, based on the company's updated financial
policy. Fitch would expect to resolve its Watch upon the conclusion
of the sale process and Spectrum's IDR could see a potential
one-notch upgrade to 'BB+'.

Central Garden & Pet Company's 'BB'/Stable rating reflects the
company's strong market positions within the pet and lawn and
garden segments, ample liquidity supported by robust FCF and
moderate leverage offset by limited scale with EBITDA below $400
million, proforma for recent acquisitions. Fitch expects modest
organic revenue growth over the medium term supplemented by
acquisitions, with pro forma EBITDA margins in the 10% area and
annual FCF of $100 million to $150 million. Gross leverage is
expected to trend in the mid-to-high 3.0x area.

Tempur Sealy's 'BB+'/Stable rating reflects its leading market
position as a vertically integrated global bedding company with
well known, established brands across a wide variety of price
points that are distributed across a number of wholesale and direct
channels. The ratings are tempered by the single product focus in a
highly competitive, fragmented market that can be exposed to
potential pullbacks in discretionary consumer spending during
periods of macroeconomic weakness. Fitch projects Tempur Sealy will
maintain long-term gross leverage in the low-2x range.

Newell's 'BB+'/Stable rating reflect its diverse portfolio of
strong brands across the learning and development, home solutions,
commercial solutions, outdoor and recreation and home appliances
categories; good geographical presence with a third of its business
coming from international markets; and a strong digital presence,
with digital representing 22% of sales. Fitch's expects EBITDA will
stabilize in the $1.3 billion-$1.4 billion range beginning 2021,
similar to 2019/2020 levels, with gross debt/EBITDA trending toward
mid-3x in 2021 from 4.4x in 2019 on continued debt reduction.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Following a decline of around 15% in 2020, organic revenue
    could expand around 7% to $1.78 billion in 2021 as remote work
    and education arrangements ease. Including the contribution
    from the PowerA acquisition, total 2021 revenue could be
    around $2 billion. Organic revenue growth could be in the low
    single digits in 2022 as ACCO is expected to continue to
    benefit from improving macroeconomic conditions;

-- EBITDA margins, which declined from approximately 15% in 2019
    to 12% in 2020, could rebound to the low-to-mid 14% range on
    the rebound in sales and the margin accretive impact of the
    PowerA acquisition. In 2021, legacy ACCO EBITDA could expand
    to around $240 million as sales rebound, with PowerA adding
    approximately $50 million in EBITDA. EBITDA in 2022 could grow
    modestly alongside top-line expansion;

-- FCF after dividends, which was $147 million in 2019, declined
    to around $100 million in 2020 as the drop in EBITDA was only
    partially mitigated by lower cash taxes and capex. FCF is
    projected to be in the $125 million range beginning 2021, as
    EBITDA growth is mitigated by higher taxes and capex;

-- The acquisition of PowerA is expected to have a modestly
    positive impact on ACCO's FCF in 2021 and 2022, in the range
    of $10 million to $15 million annually. Fitch expects ACCO
    will deploy FCF toward debt reduction but could resume its
    share buyback program at some point in 2021 or 2022. Dividends
    are projected at around $25 million, or approximately $0.26
    per share, in line with ACCO's history;

-- Gross debt/EBITDA, which averaged around 3.0x over the past
    four years, increased to the 4.0x area in 2020 excluding the
    revolver draw at year end to fund the PowerA acquisition. Pro
    forma for the acquisition, leverage at YE 2020 was
    approximately 4.6x, assuming a $50 million EBITDA
    contribution. Gross leverage could return to the high-3x by
    2021 trending towards the mid-3x thereafter assuming an EBITDA
    rebound at the legacy business and some FCF deployment toward
    debt reduction.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- An upgrade beyond 'BB' is possible if the company makes
    favorable acquisitions that change its business mix toward
    less cyclical or higher growth prospects while maintaining
    total debt/EBITDA below 3.0x. However, an upgrade is not
    anticipated in the near term given existing business model and
    industry issues.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Sustained gross leverage at or above 4.0x, generating annual
    FCF of less than $25 million, or a large debt-financed
    acquisition without a concrete plan to reduce gross leverage
    to 4.0x in a 24-month time frame could lead to a negative
    rating action.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: Liquidity is ample and is supported by the
company's consistent FCF generation, though seasonally skewed to
the second half of the year. As of June 30, 2021, ACCO had $77.9
million of cash on hand and $330.9 million of revolver
availability, net of $12.8 million outstanding letters of credit
and $256.3 million of revolver borrowings.

ACCO had $1,247 million of debt outstanding as of June 30, 2021,
consisting primarily of a $275 million in euro senior secured term
loan A, $91 million outstanding on the U.S. dollar senior secured
term loan A, $42 million under the Australian dollar senior secured
term loan A and $256 million of revolver borrowings (all of which
mature in March 2026), and $575.0 million of unsecured notes due
March 2029. Annual amortization across ACCO's capital structure is
approximately $30 million through 2023. ACCO manages to 2.5x net
debt to EBITDA and has historically applied a portion of FCF toward
debt reduction, which Fitch expects will continue.

Financial covenants include maintenance of funded indebtedness (net
of cash) to EBITDA less than 4.0x (increasing to 4.5x for up to
three quarters following an acquisition) and interest coverage
(EBITDA divided by interest expense) greater than 3.0x.

In conjunction with the PowerA acquisition, ACCO amended its credit
facility to increase permitted acquisition pro forma leverage to
4.5x from 3.5x; the company also increased its maximum net leverage
covenant by 0.5x through the second quarter of 2022. Consequently,
maximum net leverage would be 4.75x at the end of the third quarter
of 2021 and 4.25 at the end of 2021. The maximum net leverage would
step down to 4.0x at the end of the third quarter of 2022.

Recovery Considerations

Fitch has assigned Recovery Ratings (RRs) to the various debt
tranches in accordance with Fitch criteria, which allows for the
assignment of RRs for issuers with IDRs in the 'BB' category. Given
the distance to default, RRs in the 'BB' category are not computed
by bespoke analysis. Instead, they serve as a label to reflect an
estimate of the risk of these instruments relative to other
instruments in the entity's capital structure. Fitch rates ACCO's
first-lien secured debt one notch above the IDR, reflecting
outstanding recovery prospects (91%-100%) given default (RR1).
Unsecured debt will typically achieve average recovery, and thus
was assigned an 'RR4', or 31%-50% recovery.

ISSUER PROFILE

ACCO Brands (ACCO) is one of the world's largest designers,
marketers and manufacturers of branded academic, consumer and
business products. The product portfolio includes a number of
well-known brands, including Swingline, Five Star, Mead,
AT-A-GLANCE, Kensington, GBC, Tilibra, Leitz and Rapid.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


ATHEROTECH INC: Supreme Court Turns Down Dispute vs. Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf, writing for Bloomberg Law, reports that the U.S. Supreme
Court turned down a case involving jurisdictional issues related to
whether a failed blood-testing company's bankruptcy trustee can
proceed with a suit accusing its majority shareholders of
fraudulent transfer claims.

The justices' order Monday means Atherotech Inc. trustee Thomas E.
Reynolds can pursue his suit in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Alabama as long as the shareholders -- Behrman
Capital IV LP and one of its funds, MidCap Financial Investment LP
-- are properly served under Bankruptcy Rule 7004(d).  That rule
allows plaintiffs in bankruptcy-related lawsuits to serve
defendants anywhere in the U.S.

                       About Atherotech Inc.

Atherotech's main asset is its VAP cholesterol test, which is
licensed out of the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Atherotech Inc. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ala. Case No. 16-00909) on March 4, 2016.  Atherotech
Holdings, Inc., simultaneously filed a separate Chapter 7 petition
(Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 16-00910).  Atherotech listed less than
$50,000 in assets and between $50,000 and $100 million in
liabilities in its petition, the report said.  The Hon. Tamara
O'Mitchell presides over the case.  Lee Benton --
lbenton@bcattys.com -- of Benton & Centeno LLP, serves as its
bankruptcy counsel.


BARETTA INC: Seeks Court Approval to Hire GRS Appraisal
-------------------------------------------------------
Baretta, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Missouri to employ GRS Appraisal & Auction
Services, LLC.

The Debtor requires the assistance of a qualified appraiser,
auctioneer and liquidator to evaluate and sell its equipment,
inventory and memorabilia.

GRS will be compensated as follows:

     (a) a commission of 22 percent of the gross proceeds from any
sale of the property but no reimbursement for expenses;

     (b) a 15 percent buyer's premium on each item from the buyer;

     (c) a 3 percent fee for purchases by credit card; and

     (d) charge $125 per hour for "pick-up fees, labor and truck."

Nancy Cripe, president of GRS, disclosed in a court filing that her
firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Nancy Cripe
     GRS Appraisal & Auction Services
     1727 Bluffview Drive
     Dupo, IL 62239
     Phone: 618.286.4010
     Fax: 618.286.4060
     Email: info@grsauctions.com

                        About Baretta Inc.

Baretta, Inc. filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
E.D. Mo. Case No. 21-40914) on March 15, 2021, listing up to $1
million in assets and up to $500,000 in liabilities.  Judge Bonnie
L. Clair oversees the case.  Ledbetter Law Firm, LLC and Herren
Dare & Streett serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.


BARTLEY INDUSTRIES: Lender Seeks to Prohibit Cash Collateral Use
----------------------------------------------------------------
First United Bank & Trust Company asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Oklahoma to prohibit Bartley
Industries, Inc. from using cash collateral. First United is the
Debtor's secured creditor.

The Secured Creditor asserts the Debtor has not provided a budget
and related documents demonstrating sufficient adequate protection
to the Secured Creditor.  The Secured Creditor has also not
received any proposed budget from the Debtor, only profit and loss
statements from March 2021 to August 2021.

The Debtor is the owner of Accounts Receivable, secured by a Note,
Security Agreement, UCC-1 Statements, and Guaranty Agreements in
favor of First United.  The Promissory Note for $201,020, dated
July 8, 2019; secured by a Commercial Security Agreement covering
all Accounts Receivable of Bartley Industries, Inc., and perfected
in the attached UCC-1 Statements; Guaranty Agreement of even date
executed by Donna Clark to guaranty payment of the indebtedness;
and Guaranty Agreement of even date executed by Dera Clark to
guaranty payment of the indebtedness.

As of the Petition Date, the balance on the Note was principal in
the amount of $181,331, plus accrued and unpaid interest in the
amount of $1,631.59 and late fees in the amount of $150, including
without limitation reasonable fees and expenses for First United's
attorneys and related consultants in connection therewith pursuant
to the loan documents.

First United has not authorized the Debtor to use its Cash
Collateral and the Debtor has not notified the Secured Creditor of
any order from the Bankruptcy Court that allows the Debtor to use
the Cash Collateral.

The Debtor has not made any payments to the Secured Creditor in two
months, and the loan is now due for September 2021. The Debtor has
received the monthly Accounts Receivable payments related to its
business operations, secured by Loan Documents #6003. The Secured
Creditor asks the Court to enter an Order requiring the Debtor to
account for Accounts Receivable received the Petition Date through
the date of hearing on the Bank's Motion.

A copy of the motion is available at https://bit.ly/3BhUS0E from
PacerMonitor.com

                   About Bartley Industries Inc.
  
Bartley Industries Inc. offers electrical maintenance, repair and
installation services.  The company filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. W.D. Okla.  Case No. 21-12565) on September 25, 2021.  

In the petition signed by its president, Donna Bartley, the Debtor
listed $1,733,842 in total assets and $2,003,791 in total
liabilities.  

Law Offices of B David Sisson represents the Debtor, as counsel.

First United Bank and Trust Company, as secured creditor, is
represented by:

     William Riley Nix, Esq.
     717 North Crockett Street
     Sherman TX 75090
     Tel: 903/870-0212
     Fax: 903/870-0109
     Email: riley_nix@yahoo.com


BLUE TREE: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT IDRs, Outlook Remains Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDRs) of Blue Tree Holdings, Inc. and its operating subsidiaries
Bamberger Polymers Corp. and Ravago Holdings America, Inc. at
'BB-'. The Rating Outlooks remains Stable.

Fitch has applied its updated Recovery Rating criteria, upgraded
Blue Tree's senior secured term loan to 'BB+'/'RR2' from 'BB'/'RR2'
and affirmed the ABL facility at 'BB+'/'RR1'. Fitch has also
withdrawn its existing long-term issue ratings at the Bamberger and
Ravago levels.

The 'BB-' rating reflects the company's leading position in polymer
distribution, its flexible and scalable operating model, solid FCF
generation, strong relationship with suppliers, and commodity
exposure.

The Stable Outlooks reflect Fitch's expectations of continued
volumetric stability and stable cash generation throughout the
forecast horizon. To the extent that the company applies its
consistently positive cash flow toward reducing its ABL balance,
bolt-on M&A, and growth capex related to strengthening its
value-add offerings, Fitch believes that Blue Tree's operating
profile will remain strong and its credit risk manageable
throughout the ratings horizon.

The ratings have been removed from Under Criteria Observation
(UCO), where they were placed following the publication of the
updated Recovery Rating criteria on April 9, 2021.

Fitch has withdrawn its existing long-term issue ratings at the
Bamberger and Ravago levels as they are no longer considered by
Fitch to be relevant to the agency's coverage.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Recovery Ratings Criteria Update: The issue and Recovery Ratings
for Blue Tree's debt are based on Fitch's rating grid for issuers
with 'BB' category IDRs. This grid reflects average recovery
characteristics of similar-ranking instruments. Blue Tree's term
loan is viewed as Category 2 first lien, which translates into a
two-notch uplift from the 'BB-' IDR to 'BB+' and a Recovery Rating
of 'RR2'.

Elevated Polymer Pricing to Stabilize: Pricing for polyethylene and
polypropylene increased dramatically from 1H20 to 1H21 driven by
market supply issues due to coronavirus-related plant disruptions
in 2020 and weather-related plant-idling in 2021 (Winter Storm Uri,
Hurricane Ida, Hurricane Nicholas), and healthy demand for domestic
materials. Blue Tree realized relatively outsized EBITDA margins
and FCF generation through this period, supported by the company's
leading position on polymers distribution.

Prices have begun to trend lower through 2H21, with supply levels
loosening for most grades. Fitch expects polymer pricing to
continue to gradually decline towards normal levels through 2H21
and 2022 as new capacity leans the market towards balance and
demand steps back from current highs, leading to earnings
performance more consistent with historical results for Blue Tree
and its operating subsidiaries.

Fragmented Market Provides Opportunity: The global chemical
distribution market is highly fragmented, with an estimated market
size of roughly $200 billion and where the top two distributors
account for only about 10% of the market. Benefiting from size,
scale and diversification within polymers, Blue Tree is better able
to navigate logistical challenges and counterparty risk than
smaller competitors. Fitch believes that the company is likely to
continue to pursue value-add services like packaging and storing,
as well as adjacent capabilities, in order to position itself as a
clear low-cost option for major petrochemical suppliers.

Sustainable Market Leadership: Blue Tree's strong relationship with
suppliers allowed them to capture a relatively larger proportion of
supply than many of its competitors, and as a result the company
was able to grow share throughout 2020 and 1H21. During the global
financial crisis, the company generated strong FCF despite adverse
macroeconomic cycles and volatile raw material prices due in large
part to its countercyclical working capital profile.

Solid, Stable FCF: Blue Tree's strong relationships with customers
and countercyclical working capital have resulted in strong, stable
cash generation through the cycle. The company's manufacturing
capabilities add value on both the supplier and consumer side,
which alongside the company's disciplined approach to capital
deployment are supportive of the company's credit profile. Fitch
believes that Blue Tree will allocate cash flow toward a
combination of capital projects and bolt-on acquisitions which
expand the company's value-add services, and debt reduction (most
likely through ABL paydown) such that they can comfortably operate
with total debt with equity credit/operating EBITDA of around
3.5x.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Blue Tree is the largest North American polymer distributor in a
fragmented industry. Relative to Univar (BB+/Stable), Blue Tree is
smaller, with a narrower product portfolio. Beyond chemicals, Fitch
compares Blue Tree to IT distributor Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(BBB-/Stable), and metals distributor Reliance Steel and Aluminium
Co. (BBB+/Stable).

Each of these distributors benefits from significant size, scale
and diversification compared with peers within their markets. Fitch
believes the fragmented nature of, and potential for, continued
outsourcing within chemicals distribution provides distributors
like Blue Tree and Univar a unique opportunity to increase market
share and capture potential market expansion.

Fitch views cash flow risk within the distribution industry as
relatively low compared with chemicals producers, given the limited
commodity price risk, diversification of customers and end-markets,
low annual capex requirements of 1%-2% annually, and working
capital benefits in the current down cycle. While technology and
metals distribution market risks differ, the overall operating
performances and cash flow resiliency are similar, with FCF margins
for these distribution peers averaging in the low-to-mid-single
digits over the past five years.

Fitch expects a more normalized price environment coupled with
management directing cash flows toward modest gross debt reduction
and bolt-on M&A to lead to gross leverage of around 3.5x. Fitch
views this leverage profile to be consistent with 'BB-' rating
tolerances.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Gradually lower polymer pricing as market supply issues
    alleviate, while volume growth is modest due to normalized
    demand levels;

-- Margins normalize towards historical levels;

-- Solid FCF generation throughout forecast, supported early in
    the forecast by countercyclical working capital;

-- FCF allocated primarily toward bolt-on M&A and gross debt
    reduction.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Gross debt reduction and steady EBITDA growth, leading to
    Total Debt with Equity Credit/Operating EBITDA durably below
    3.25x or FFO Adjusted Leverage durably below 4.25x;

-- Continued investment in additional product lines and ancillary
    services, further strengthening relationships with suppliers
    and customers;

-- Demonstrated ability to generate solid free cash flow during
    periods of depressed earnings;

-- Demonstrated track record of adherence to capital allocation
    priorities and financial policy targets.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Harsher than expected competition and/or poor cost control
    efforts, leading to Total Debt with Equity Credit/Operating
    EBITDA durably above 3.75x or FFO Adjusted Leverage durably
    above 4.75x;

-- Deterioration in the company's relationships with suppliers,
    leading to eroding market share;

-- Continually strained operating environment, leading to a
    strained earnings profile and reductions in the borrowing
    base, resulting in pressured liquidity;

-- More aggressive than expected financial policy, representing a
    departure from historical norms.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Sufficient Liquidity: Blue Tree faces limited maturities until the
ABL matures in 2026 (followed by the term loan in 2028). While the
$870 million ABL is over 50% utilized as of 2Q21, Fitch anticipates
near-term working capital inflows to be applied toward ABL debt
repayment which, in addition to solid forecasted FCF generation,
should support a sufficient liquidity profile for the company.

ISSUER PROFILE

Blue Tree Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Ravago S.A. and the
parent company of Ravago Holdings America, Inc. and Bamberger
Polymers Corp., is a leading polymer and chemical distribution
company and provider of value-added services, working with leading
suppliers worldwide. Blue Tree is the largest company in the highly
fragmented U.S. polymer market. Ravago provides value-add services
such as blending, mixing, and formulating.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


BLUEBERRY COMMONS: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Blueberry Commons Sunnyvalle LLC
        1944 Kingsley St.
        Santa Cruz, CA 95062

Business Description: Blueberry Commons Sunnyvalle LLC is a Single
                      Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined in 11
                      U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The Debtor is the
                      fee simple owner of a land subdivided into
                      six parcels in Sunnyvale, California valued
                      at $3.5 million.
            
Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of California

Case No.: 21-51275

Debtor's Counsel: Kevin Tang, Esq.
                  TANG & ASSOCIATES
                  17011 Beach Blvd
                  Suite 900
                  Huntington Beach, CA 92647
                  Tel: (714) 594-7022
                  Fax: (714) 594-7024
                  Email: kevin@tang-associates.com

Total Assets: $3,500,000

Total Liabilities: $3,095,426

The petition was signed by Hui Jiang as managing member.

The Debtor listed the Franchise Tax Board as its sole unsecured
creditor holding a claim of $4,000.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/PTO7DUA/Blueberry_Commons_Sunnyvalle_LLC__canbke-21-51275__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


BROADSTREET PARTNERS: S&P Rates $332.5MM 1st-Lien Term Loan 'B'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) to BroadStreet
Partners Inc.'s (B/Stable/--) proposed $332.5 million first-lien
term loan tranche B-2. While the proposed offering will be
nonfungible with the company's existing $1.097 billion first-lien
term loan outstanding as of June 30, 2021, it will have the same
Jan. 20, 2027 maturity date.

BroadStreet also intends to raise a $325 million add-on to the
company's existing $400 million senior unsecured notes. The senior
unsecured notes add-on and new nonfungible first-lien term loan
will not affect our ratings on BroadStreet--including S&P's 'B'
long-term issuer credit rating, 'B' first-lien credit facility debt
rating, and 'CCC+' unsecured debt rating.

S&P said, "We expect BroadStreet to use proceeds from the raises to
repay revolver borrowings and incremental private financing that
were used to fund the largest core partnership to date. Including
the new debt issuances, additional earnout obligations, and
annualized earnings contributions from closed acquisitions,
BroadStreet's pro forma leverage for the 12 months ended June 30,
2021 is approximately 6.9x with EBITDA interest coverage of 3.0x.
While the company's leverage is trending higher relative to our
expectations, we believe metrics remain in line with the 'B'
rating.

"BroadStreet performed favorably in the 12 months ended June 30,
2021, in our view, with revenue growing 21.4% to $883 million and
modest EBITDA margin expansion. Over the 12 months, BroadStreet's
organic growth (including contingent commissions) was 3.1%,
improving slightly compared to 2.3% in calendar 2020. Although the
employee benefits business--which represents less than 25% of the
overall business--continues to report negative organic growth, we
expect the segment to turn around in the second half of 2021 as
employment levels improve. Complementing the company's organic
expansion is BroadStreet's continued execution on its robust
acquisition pipeline. Since the end of the second quarter,
BroadStreet has completed two core partnerships and 10 tuck-in
acquisitions, totaling to 31 deals closed year-to-date. For the
remainder of 2021, we expect BroadStreet to continue to pursue
tuck-in deals funded through cash on hand and for the company to
deleverage as it integrates accretive acquisitions."



BRODIE HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Brodie Holdings LLC
        830 High Street
        Chestertown, MD 21620

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Maryland

Case No.: 21-16309

Debtor's Counsel: Tate M. Russack, Esq.
                  RLC, PA LAWYERS & CONSULTANTS
                  7999 North Federal Highway
                  Suite 102
                  Boca Raton, FL 33487
                  Tel: 561-571-9610
                  Fax: 800-883-5692
                  Email: Tate@russack.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Harry Kaiser as managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's five unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/CWZKBQQ/Brodie_Holdings_LLC__mdbke-21-16309__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


BROOKS AUTOMATION: S&P Places 'BB-' ICR on CreditWatch Developing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on Brooks Automation
Inc., including its 'BB-' issuer credit rating and 'BB-'
issue-level rating on its senior secured debt, on CreditWatch with
developing implications.

S&P expects to resolve the CreditWatch placement when it has fully
assessed the transaction's effects on the company's business and
financial positions.

The CreditWatch placement follows the company's announcement that
it has entered into agreement to sell its semiconductor business
for $3.0 billion in cash. S&P expects the deal to close in the
first half of calendar year 2022. The semiconductor business
reported around $600 million in revenue in the twelve-months-ended
June 30, 2021, and the life sciences segment reported around $485
million in the same period. S&P adjusted leverage was 0.4x on June
30, 2021.

As a result of the pending sale, the company will no longer pursue
a separation into two independent and publicly traded companies as
announced in May 2021. Following the sale, the remaining business
will operate as a standalone, publicly-traded life sciences
company.

CreditWatch

S&P said, "We will resolve the CreditWatch placement after
reviewing the prospective company's capital structure, financial
policy, business strategy, and outlook. We will reassess the
ratings based on our view of the business profile, as well as
capitalization, of the entity as a standalone life-sciences
company."



BUZZ FINCO: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LT IDR & Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating
(IDR) of Buzz Finco L.L.C. at 'BB-' and upgraded the senior secured
revolver and term loans to 'BB+'/'RR1' from 'BB/RR2'. The upgrade
resolves the Under Criteria Observation (UCO) designation placed on
Buzz Finco L.L.C. in April 2021 related to the modification of
Fitch's Recovery Ratings and Instrument Ratings criteria. Fitch
believes the senior secured revolver and term loans satisfy the
conditions of category 1 first lien debt and accordingly receive an
RR1 recovery rating and 2-notch uplift from the IDR. Fitch has also
assigned a 'BB-' IDR to Bumble Inc.

The Rating Outlook has been revised to Stable from Negative.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IPO and Organic Growth Drive Deleveraging: Bumble's leverage has
quickly declined from a peak of 5.6x in Oct-2020 to 3.4x in the LTM
period ended June 2021. Deleveraging has been driven by both strong
organic EBITDA growth and a $200 million term loan repayment paid
with proceeds of Bumble's February 2021 IPO. Fitch expects
continued EBITDA growth to drive further deleveraging, but expects
leverage to likely remain above Fitch's 3.0x positive ratings
sensitivity.

Industry Growth Supported by Secular Tailwinds: Fitch expects the
online dating industry, and freemium dating applications in
particular, to experience strong user and revenue growth over the
rating horizon. Fitch believes growth will be supported by
increasing international smartphone penetration, declining marriage
rates, lessening stigmas around online dating and an increasing
proportion of Generation Z being eligible to use web-based dating
services. Fitch believes Bumble is well positioned to benefit from
this secular trend.

Bumble's revenue growth trajectory was not significantly affected
by coronavirus-related restrictions on social gatherings, and the
business has exhibited strong sequential revenue growth in each
month since April 2020. Fitch expects that loosening
pandemic-related restrictions globally will also drive additional
user growth, as in-person dating becomes more accessible.

Limited Product Diversification: Bumble's portfolio consists of two
main platforms, Bumble and Badoo, which represented 65% and 35% of
revenue, respectively, in the LTM period ended June 2021. Fitch
believes limited product diversification increases credit risk as
any significant operational or reputational issues at either
platform may have a significant impact on Bumble's consolidated
financial profile. While the Bumble application has modes that
extend beyond dating, including BFF and Bizz, Fitch does not
believe these modes currently have a large enough user base to
provide material product level diversification.

Significant Level of Competition: Bumble competes in the crowded
and competitive online dating industry. Bumble's main competitor is
Match Group, Inc. which owns the largest and highest grossing
dating app in the world, Tinder, as well as a number of other
competitive platforms such as Hinge, PlentyofFish, Match.com,
eHarmony, etc. Fitch believes that multiple large competitors can
exist in the dating app space, as users will frequently use and pay
for multiple dating applications at once.

Fitch believes Match Group is better competitively positioned due
to its large number of platforms with critical user mass, and
relatively conservative capitalization and strong financial profile
such. As a result, Match Group can deploy financial resources
aggressively to acquire competitors and introduce features across
its platforms aimed at competing with Bumble. Fitch believes
Bumble's focus on female empowerment and safety provides important
competitive differentiation, though Fitch questions the long-term
sustainability of this advantage against competitors with
significant financial resources and only modest barriers to entry
for new dating applications.

Robust Cash Flow Generation: Fitch expects Bumble to generate
strong FCF margins over the rating horizon. Cash flow generation
will be supported by a strong EBITDA margin profile, limited
working capital requirements, and low levels of capital intensity.
Fitch believes strong FCF generation provides management with
significant financial flexibility to pursue strategic investments
with internally generated resources. However, consistently
allocating FCF toward shareholder distributions will limit
financial flexibility.

Concentrated Voting Power: Blackstone, Bumble's sponsor, and
Whitney Wolfe Herd, Bumble's Founder and CEO, collectively hold 93%
of Bumble Inc.'s voting power. Blackstone holds 72% of the voting
power while Wolfe Herd holds 21%. Fitch believes the concentration
of voting power between the sponsor and the founder increases the
likelihood of shareholder friendly actions, which negatively
affects the credit profile.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Bumble's 'BB-' IDR is supported by Bumble's competitive positioning
as a safe and female-friendly dating application, relatively
conservative leverage profile, strong FCF generation and Fitch's
expectation for the company to achieve sustained strong revenue
growth supported by a number of secular tailwinds. The credit
profile's strengths are offset by material discretionary consumer
spending exposure, limited product diversification and significant
sector competition. The 'RR1' Recovery Rating on the senior secured
debt reflects Fitch's expectation for a superior recovery based on
the company's strong underlying cash flow generation, profitability
and brand value.

Bumble builds and operates dating and social networking mobile
applications, which most notably include Bumble and Badoo. Bumble
does not have any direct peers within Fitch's corporates universe.
Fitch believes Bumble's operational, financial and credit
protection metrics position it well in the 'BB-' rating category
compared with Fitch's rated TMT universe.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Consolidated revenue expected to grow at a double-digit CAGR
    over the rating horizon, driven by both paying user growth and
    ARPPU growth, reflecting the strong secular tailwinds in the
    online dating industry and the company's new user monetization
    initiatives;

-- Fitch assumes a majority of revenue growth will be derived
    from Bumble subscription and transaction growth, as a majority
    of marketing spend is allocated toward Bumble user
    acquisition;

-- Fitch does not assume any acquisitions over the forecast
    period;

-- Gross profit margins assumed to be stable over the forecast
    horizon;

-- Fitch assumes EBITDA margins range between 27%-29%

-- Fitch assumes stable capital intensity over the rating
    horizon;

-- Fitch assumes Bumble repurchases $1.1 billion of shares,
    funded primarily with free cash flow as well as some
    incremental debt.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Bumble's consolidated revenue growth materially exceeding
    industry growth;

-- Total debt with equity credit/operating EBITDA sustained below
    3.0x;

-- Sustained double-digit FCF margins.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Debt funded acquisitions or shareholder returns causing total
    debt with equity credit/operating EBITDA to exceed 4.0x
    without a credible plan for deleveraging;

-- Match Group, Facebook or other competitors taking material
    market share from Bumble, resulting in poor operating
    performance and depressed profitability. Fitch believes
    indicators would be flat to negative revenue growth and EBITDA
    margins sustained near or below 20%;

-- Sustained low single-digit FCF margins.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Strong Liquidity Position: As of June 2021, Bumble's liquidity is
supported by $252 million of readily available cash and an undrawn
$50 million revolver. Fitch expects liquidity will be further
supported by consistent FCF generation, due to strong profitability
and limited capital requirements.

Bumble's debt structure is comprised of a $50 million senior
secured revolver and $641.4 million of outstanding senior secured
term loans. The revolver matures in January 2025, and the term loan
matures January 2027. Bumble has no significant debt maturities
over the rating horizon, and will only be required to make $1.4
million quarterly amortization payments over the life of the term
loan. Fitch believes Bumble's liquidity is sufficient to support
its debt service over the ratings horizon.

ISSUER PROFILE

Bumble Inc. builds and operates dating and social networking mobile
applications, which most notably include Bumble and Badoo. On a
consolidated basis, Bumble has more than 40 million monthly active
users across more than 150 countries.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Bumble has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for social impacts due to
Bumble's position as a female-friendly dating application seeking
to mitigate harassment or abusive language frequently experienced
by women on dating applications, which has a positive impact on the
credit profile, and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction with
other factors. Fitch believes that Bumble's female friendly
policies give Bumble a competitive advantage in the online dating
industry, which bolsters the company's strong market position and
supports user retention rates.

Bumble has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for governance structure
due to the sponsor and founder's collective control of all
operational and financing decisions, which has a negative impact on
the credit profile, and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction
with other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.


BYRNA TECHNOLOGIES: Appoints Emily Rooney as Director
-----------------------------------------------------
The board of directors of Byrna Technologies Inc. filled a newly
created vacancy by appointing Emily Rooney as a director.  The
Company anticipates that Rooney will serve on the Board's Audit
Committee.  The Board has determined that Rooney is independent for
purposes of serving on the Board under the applicable rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the Nasdaq Marketplace.
There are no arrangements or understandings between Rooney and any
other persons, pursuant to which she was selected as a director.

Rooney was host and executive editor of WGBH's weekly Beat The
Press program for 24 years, a media criticism program which has
earned awards including two local Emmy's, five National Press Club
awards, and the University of Pennsylvania's Bart Richards Award
for media criticism.  Simultaneously, Rooney was host and executive
editor of Greater Boston, WGBH's local issues and public affairs
program for 18 years.  During that time, Greater Boston was honored
with several New England Emmys, Associated Press and Edward R.
Murrow Awards for Best Public Affairs Program, and excellence in
writing and commentary.  Rooney has also received the Dennis Kauff
Award for Excellence in Reporting, the Yankee Quill Award from the
American Newspaper Society, Reporter of the Year Award from the
Massachusetts Bar Association, and has been inducted into the
Massachusetts Broadcasters Hall of Fame.

Rooney came to WGBH from the Fox Network in New York, where she
oversaw political coverage, including the 1996 presidential
primaries, national conventions, and presidential election.  When
she joined Fox in 1994, she was senior producer of Fox news
productions, developing news programming for Fox and producing
specials.  Prior to Fox, Rooney was executive producer of ABC's
World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

Rooney is a graduate of American University in Washington, D.C. and
has honorary doctorates from UMass Boston and Westfield State.

Rooney will receive compensation as an outside director of the
Company under the director compensation policies adopted by the
Board from time to time.  

                     About Byrna Technologies

Headquartered in Byrna Technologies Inc. -- www.byrna.com --
develops, manufactures, and sells non-lethal ammunition and
security devices.  These products are used by the military,
correctional services, police agencies, private security and
consumers.

Byrna Technologies reported a net loss of $12.55 million for the
year ended Nov. 30, 2020, a net loss of $4.41 million for the
fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2019, a net loss of $2.15 million for
the fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2018, and a net loss of $2.8 million
for the fiscal year ended Nov. 30, 2017.  As of May 31, 2021, the
Company had $22.03 million in total assets, $8.88 million in total
liabilities, and $13.15 million in total stockholders' equity.


CALPLANT I LLC: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Two affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                        Case No.
    ------                                        --------
    CalPlant I Holdco, LLC (Lead Case)            21-11302
    6101 State Highway 162
    Willows, CA 95988

    CalPlant I, LLC                               21-11303
    6101 State Highway 162
    Willows, CA 95988

Business Description: The Debtors have constructed the world's
                      first plant capable of manufacturing medium
                      density fiberboard ("MDF") from rice straw.
                      Located in northern California approximately

                      85 miles north of Sacramento, the Plant
                      converts rice straw -- a waste product of
                      rice farming -- into MDF.  While the Plant
                      has been in development for nearly three
                      decades and has been selling MDF for six
                      months, it is not yet fully operational.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware

Judge: Hon. John T. Dorsey

Debtors'
Local
Bankruptcy
Counsel:          Eric J. Monzo, Esq.
                  Brya M. Keilson, Esq.
                  MORRIS JAMES LLP
                  500 Delaware Avenue
                  Suite 1500
                  Wilmington, DE 19801
                  Tel: 302-888-6800
                  Fax: 302-888-6800
                  Email: emonzo@morrisjames.com
                         bkeilson@morrisjames.com


Debtors'
Bankruptcy
Counsel:          Jennifer L. Marines, Esq.
                  Benjamin Butterfield, Esq.     
                  Miranda K. Russell, Esq.
                  MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP  
                  250 West 55th Street
                  New York, New York 10019
                  Tel: (212) 468-8000
                  Fax: (212) 468-7900
                  Email: jmarines@mofo.com
                         bbutterfield@mofo.com
                         mrussell@mofo.com

Debtors'
Restructuring &
Financial
Advisor:          PALADIN MANAGEMENT GROUP

Debtors'
Claims &
Noticing
Agent:            PRIME CLERK LLC

CalPlant I Holdco's
Estimated Assets: $50 million to $100 million

CalPlant I Holdco's
Estimated Liabilities: $0 to $50,000

CalPlant I, LLC's
Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

CalPlant I, LLC's
Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

The petitions were signed by Jeffrey N. Wagner, executive
chairman.

CalPlant I Holdco stated it has no creditors holding unsecured
claims.

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/BOFEDLI/CalPlant_I_Holdco_LLC__debke-21-11302__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/BIM7XHI/CalPlant_I_LLC__debke-21-11303__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of CalPlant I, LLC's Five Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Con-Vey LLC                        Equipment             $7,050
PO Box 1399                           Supplier
Roseburg, OR 97470
Mark Halliday
Tel: (541) 672-5506
Email: mark.halliday@con-vey.com

2. Direct Energy Business              Utility            $237,700
P.O. Box 32179                         Service
New York, NY 10087-2179
Diane Holman
Tel: 949-294-0709
Email: diane.holman@directenergy.com

3. Pacific Gas and Electric            Utility            $988,941

Box 997300                             Services
Sacramento, CA
95899-7300
Tino Nava
Tel: 530-519-1303
Email: tan4@pge.com

4. Siempelkamp Maschinen               Equipment        $2,664,099
Siempelkampstr 75                      Supplier
Krefeld D-47803
Germany
Roland Peltzer
Tel: (49)151-14736693
Email: roland.peltzer@siempelkamp.com

5. Western States Fire                 Trade Vendor       $407,183
Protection Co
188 Cirby Way
Roseville, CA 95678
Madison Lee
Tel: (916) 924-1631
Email: MADISON.LEE@WSFP.US


CARNIVAL CORP: Delays Debt Reckoning by Refinancing Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------
Davide Scigliuzzo of Bloomberg News reports that Carnival Corp.'s
path to recovery from the pandemic is still fraught with
uncertainties.  But the cruise-line operator is on track to sell
debt yielding around 4% to refinance bonds, issued during the worst
of the Covid-19 lockdowns last year, that pay almost three times as
much.  Carnival's ability to refinance cheaply shows both
investors' optimism for the cruise industry and the dearth of
opportunities in a market still buoyed by liquidity.  The
Miami-based company said it expects to return its full fleet to the
seas by the spring of 2022.

                        About Carnival Corp.

Carnival plc operates as a leisure travel company in North America,
Australia, Europe, and Asia. It operates in four segments: North
America and Australia Cruise Operations, Europe and Asia Cruise
Operations, Cruise Support, and Tour and Other. The company
operates cruises under the Carnival Cruise Line, Princess Cruises,
Holland America Line, P&O Cruises (Australia), Seabourn, Costa,
AIDA, P&O Cruises (UK), and Cunard brand names. Carnival plc was
founded in 1850 and is based in Southampton, the United Kingdom.



CARNIVAL CORP: S&P Assigns 'BB-' Rating on First-Lien Term Loan
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating to
U.S.-based cruise operator Carnival Corp.'s proposed $1.5 billion
term loan B. The recovery rating is '1', indicating our expectation
for very high (90%-100%; rounded estimate 95%) recovery for lenders
in the event of a default. Carnival plans to use proceeds from the
loan to redeem amounts under its existing 11.5% first-priority
senior secured notes due 2023 ($2 billion outstanding), and to pay
premiums, accrued interest, and fees and expenses.

S&P said, "Since the transaction is largely debt for debt, it does
not affect our 'B' issuer credit rating or negative outlook on
Carnival. We expect the transaction will reduce Carnival's interest
burden because we expect the margin on the term loan B will be
about the same as the margin on Carnival's existing term loan B,
which is 3.75%- significantly lower than the 11.5% rate on the
secured notes the company is redeeming." The transaction will also
result in a modest improvement in the company's maturity profile.

Recovery analysis

Key analytical factors:

-- S&P assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating to Carnival's
proposed $1.5 billion new term loan B. The recovery rating is '1',
indicating its expectation for very high (90%-100%; rounded
estimate 95%) recovery for lenders in the event of a default.

All other issue-level ratings are unchanged.

Simulated default assumptions:

-- S&P simulated default scenario contemplates a default occurring
by 2024 due to a significant decline in cash flow from permanently
impaired demand for cruises following the negative publicity and
travel advisories during the COVID-19 pandemic, a prolonged
economic downturn, and/or increased competitive pressures.

-- S&P includes in its assumption of unsecured claims that benefit
from subsidiary guarantees new ship debt that we expect Carnival to
incur before the year of default.

-- S&P estimates gross enterprise value at emergence of around $23
billion by applying a 7x multiple to our estimate of EBITDA at
emergence. It uses a multiple that is at the high end of its range
for leisure companies to reflect Carnival's good position in the
cruise industry, which is a small but underpenetrated segment of
the overall travel and vacation industry.

-- S&P allocate its estimate of gross enterprise value at
emergence among secured and unsecured claims based on its
understanding of the contribution, by asset value, of the parent
and subsidiary guarantors.

-- S&P assumes that of its estimated gross enterprise value at
emergence, about 71% is available to cover first- and
second-priority secured claims, around 16% is available to cover
unsecured claims that benefit from subsidiary guarantees, and
around 13% is available to cover unsecured claims that only benefit
from parent guarantees.

-- S&P said, "Under our analysis, and after subtracting
administrative expenses from our estimate of gross enterprise
value, around $15.5 billion of enterprise value would be available
to cover secured claims. After satisfying first- and
second-priority secured claims, any remaining value, which we
estimate to be $5.7 billion, is then allocated among claims that
benefit from subsidiary guarantees, and those that only benefit
from parent guarantees. This is because it is our understanding
that a material portion of the collateral sits at the subsidiary
guarantors."

-- S&P said, "Under our analysis, we attribute $3.5 billion of the
residual value, after satisfying first- and second-priority claims,
to unsecured debt that benefits from subsidiary guarantees. This
debt also benefits from the enterprise value, around $3.5 billion,
that is not pledged as collateral and that we attribute to the
unsecured debt that has subsidiary guarantees. The total value,
around $7 billion, only partially covers our estimate of unsecured
debt with subsidiary guarantees at default. We assume these
deficiency claims are pari passu with the unsecured debt that has
only parent guarantees."

-- S&P said, "Under our analysis, we attribute around $2.2 billion
of the residual value, after satisfying first- and second-priority
secured claims, and around $2.8 billion in enterprise value that we
attribute to the unsecured debt that has only parent guarantees.
The total value, around $5 billion, only partially covers our
estimate of those unsecured claims and pari passu deficiency claims
at default."

-- S&P assumes Carnival's revolvers are 100% drawn at default.

Simplified waterfall:

-- Emergence EBITDA: $3.3 billion

-- EBITDA multiple: 7x

-- Gross enterprise value: $23.4 billion

-- Net enterprise value available after administrative expenses
(7%): $21.8 billion

-- Value attributable to secured/unsecured claims: $15.5
billion/$6.3 billion

-- Value available to first-lien secured claims: $15.5 billion

-- Estimated first-lien secured claims at default: $7.6 billion

    --Recovery range: 90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%

-- Value available to second-lien secured claims: $8 billion

-- Estimated second lien secured claims at default: $2.3 billion

    --Recovery range: 90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%

-- Value available (including some residual value after satisfying
secured first and second lien claims) to unsecured claims that
benefit from subsidiary guarantees (the export credit facilities,
the 2026 and 2027 notes, the 2023 convertible notes, the revolver,
and bi-lateral bank facilities): $7 billion

-- Pro rata share of parent value: $4.5 billion

-- Total value available to unsecured claims that benefit from
subsidiary guarantees: $11.5 billion

-- Estimated unsecured claims that benefit from subsidiary
guarantees at default: $24.2 billion

    --Recovery range: 30%-50%; rounded estimate: 45%

-- Value available to unsecured debt with only parent guarantees:
$0.5 billion

-- Unsecured claims with only parent guarantees at default: $1.7
billion

    --Recovery range: 10%-30%; rounded estimate: 25%

Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.



CASTLELAKE AVIATION: S&P Assigns 'B+' Rating on Sr. Unsec. Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B+' issue-level rating and '5'
recovery rating to the senior unsecured notes issued by aircraft
operating lessor Castlelake Aviation Ltd.'s subsidiary Castlelake
Aviation Finance DAC. Newly-formed Castlelake will use the proceeds
from these notes, along with the proceeds from its term loan B, to
acquire its initial aircraft portfolio, as well as for general
corporate purposes. The '5' recovery rating indicates its
expectation for modest (10%-30%; rounded estimate: 25%) recovery in
the event of a payment default.

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

-- S&P's analysis suggests that the collateral for the proposed
term loan, which comprises 52 aircraft, will cover about 73% of the
facility at default, while its share of the unpledged value pushes
the total recovery above 75%. The unpledged value relating to the
unencumbered aircraft would be sufficient to provide about 25%
coverage of the unsecured claims, including the proposed senior
unsecured notes and the secured deficiency claim.

-- S&P's simulated default scenario assumes a significant
disruption in the air travel industry in 2025, which causes
airlines to renegotiate their leases and turn back aircraft on
lease. This causes aircraft values to decline, requiring the
company to use cash flow to pay down certain secured aircraft
financing to meet its collateralization covenants.

-- S&P values the company on a going concern basis following a
discrete asset valuation approach. The initial fleet comprises 71
aircraft. S&P depreciates the appraised value of the aircraft to
the year of default (2025), at which point it applies realization
rates to reflect the contraction of their value in distressed
circumstances.

Simplified waterfall

-- Gross enterprise value (discrete asset valuation approach):
$1,395 million

-- Valuation split between unencumbered assets/term loan B
collateral/AirAsia collateral: 19%/64%/17%

-- Net enterprise value after 5% administrative expenses: $1,325
million

-- Estimated collateral value available to the proposed term loan:
$850 million

-- Additional recovery through unencumbered assets: $86 million

-- Total value available to the proposed term loan: $936 million

-- Estimated term loan balance at default: $1,172 million

    --Recovery expectations: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 75%)

-- Total value available to unsecured claims: $251 million

-- Senior unsecured notes/pari passu claims (term loan and
revolver deficits): $431 million/$508 million

    --Recovery expectations: 10%-30% (rounded estimate: 25%)

Notes: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition
interest.


  Ratings List

  CASTLELAKE AVIATION LIMITED

  Issuer Credit Rating       BB-/Stable/--

  NEW RATING

  CASTLELAKE AVIATION FINANCE DAC

  Senior Unsecured
   USD notes                 B+
    Recovery Rating          5(25%)



CHIMNEY PASTURES: Unsecureds Will Get 100% of Claims in 36 Months
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Chimney Pasture Ranch, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas a Disclosure Statement and Plan
of Reorganization for Small Business dated September 30, 2021.

Chimney Pasture is a Texas limited liability company that was
established in 2004 and is wholly owned by Charles L. Newcomb.  It
owns approximately 1,254 acres of ranch land in Starr County, Texas
(the "Property") with improvements including a 10,000 square foot
barndominium.  The Property secures a loan from Texas First Bank.
Chimney Pasture inadvertently failed to refinance the loan before
it came due.  Chimney Pasture filed this bankruptcy case in order
to secure a longer period of time in which to pay the loan on the
Property.

The Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay Chimney Pasture's
creditors primarily from future rental income generated by the
Chimney Pasture's lease of the Property.  Although the Property is
not yet leased, Chimney Pasture believes that it will be able to
find a suitable tenant and that rent from the lease will be
sufficient to fund the Plan.

Non-priority unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will
receive distributions valued at the full amount of their allowed
claim.  This Plan also provides for the payment of administrative
and priority claims.

The Plan will treat claims as follows:

     * Class 1 consists of the claim of Texas First Bank. Texas
First Bank filed a proof of claim for $438,396.06. Chimney Pasture
will pay post-petition interest on Texas First Bank's claim of
$438,396.06 at a rate of 4.75% per year from the petition date
until the claim amount is paid in full. Chimney Pasture will make
36 monthly payments to Texas First Bank on the fifth day of each
month, with the first payment to be made on the fifth day of the
first full calendar month after the effective date of the Plan.

     * Class 2 consists of the claim of Starr County Tax Office.
Chimney Pasture will pay the claim of Starr County Tax Office, plus
post-petition interest accruing on this amount at a rate of 12% per
year from the petition date until the amount is paid in full in 36
equal monthly payments, beginning on the fifth day of the first
full.

     * Class 3 consists of NonPriority Unsecured Creditors. Chimney
Pasture will pay 100% of the claims in Class 3 in 36 equal monthly
payments, beginning on the fifth day of the first full calendar
month after the effective date of the Plan.

     * Class 4 consists of Equity Security Holders. The class 4
creditor will retain his stock interests subject to the terms of
this plan.

Chimney Pasture expects to lease the Property and fund the Plan
with rental income from the lease. Except for any items of property
specifically surrendered according to the terms of the Plan,
Chimney Pasture will retain the property of the bankruptcy estate.
Charles Newcomb will remain president of the reorganized Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated September 30,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3A9tkJp from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for the Debtor:

     Reese Baker, Esq.
     Baker & Associates
     950 Echo Lane, Ste 300
     Houston, TX 77024
     Tel: (713) 979-2279

                    About Chimney Pastures Ranch

Houston-based Chimney Pastures Ranch, LLC filed its voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Texas Case No. 21-32253) on July 2, 2021. Charles Newcomb,
president, signed the petition.  In the petition, the Debtor
disclosed $1 million to $10 million in assets and $100,000 to
$500,000 in liabilities.  Judge Christopher M. Lopez presides over
the case.  Reese Baker, Esq., at Baker & Associates, represents the
Debtor as legal counsel.


CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC: Fitch Raises IDRs to 'BB-', Outlook Positive
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded the Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) for
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. (CLF) and its subsidiary, AK Steel
Corporation to 'BB-' from 'B'. Fitch has also upgraded both
companies' debt ratings.

The upgrades reflect solid steel fundamentals, including
historically high steel prices, which has resulted in materially
higher EBITDA generation, significantly improved leverage metrics
and should also lead to strong free cash flow generation. Strong
cash flow generation will result in the ability to significantly
reduce debt.

The Rating Outlook is Positive, which reflects the possibility that
total debt/EBITDA could be sustained below 2.5x over the rating
horizon. The IDR could be upgraded if mid-cycle total debt/EBITDA
is expected to be sustained below 2.5x, pension funding is improved
and FCF is expected to be positive and is allocated toward gross
debt repayment resulting in gross debt in the $4.0-$4.5 billion
range.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Improved Steel Market Conditions: The timing and magnitude of
recovery in automotive demand has been faster than Fitch initially
anticipated, leading to improved steel market fundamentals. HRC
prices have recovered dramatically to historical highs and are
supported by solid supply/demand dynamics, consolidation in the
industry which has resulted in supply discipline, raw material
prices and relatively low imports.

The improved domestic steel environment leads to significantly
stronger than expected EBITDA generation and improved leverage
metrics. Fitch expects strong steel fundamentals to result in
significant cash flow generation and deleveraging capacity. Total
debt/EBITDA was 3.2x as of 2Q 2021 and Fitch expects it to be
maintained in the 2.5x-3.5x range over the ratings horizon. Fitch
expects cash to be used for debt repayment, particularly toward
outstanding borrowings on the ABL in the near-term.

AM USA Acquisition: Fitch viewed the acquisition of ArcelorMittal
USA as a credit positive, as it was deleveraging, creates the
opportunity for debt reduction and results in increased size, scale
and end-market diversification. CLF is now the largest flat-rolled
steel producer and largest iron ore pellet producer in North
America. Approximately 66% of AK Steel's 2019 sales were to the
automotive market, whereas roughly 27% of AM USA's 2019 sales were
to the automotive market. Fitch views the increased end-market
diversification and reduced concentration in the auto market
positively. However, Cliffs will still have relatively high auto
market exposure.

High-Value Add Focus: AK Steel is one of a few North American steel
producers capable of producing some of the most sophisticated
grades of advanced high-strength steels and value-added stainless
steel products, and the only producer of non-oriented electrical
steel, a critical component of hybrid/electric vehicles' motors. AK
Steel also produces steel grades critical to automotive
light-weighting steel trends, and it is well positioned longer-term
to benefit from an auto recovery and the transition to electric
cars. AK Steel's benefits from a higher proportion of fixed price
contracts leading to less price volatility compared with other
players in the industry.

AK Steel Merger: Cliffs consummated a merger with AK Steel, its
second-largest iron ore pellet customer, on March 13, 2020, at
which point AK Steel became Cliffs' wholly owned subsidiary.
Cliffs' debt outstanding increased by approximately $2.24 billion
in 1Q20, and Cliffs assumed significant pension obligations of AK
Steel as part of the merger. However, Fitch viewed the transaction
as relatively leverage-neutral on a normalized basis, with
additional earnings offsetting the increase in debt.

Vertically Integrated Business Model: Cliffs' merger with AK Steel
created a vertically integrated steel producer that is
self-sufficient in iron ore, which Fitch expects to improve steel
margins and provide the opportunity for synergies. Following its AM
USA acquisition, Cliffs has roughly 17 million tons of additional
steel capacity.

HBI Strategy: EAF steel producers have been taking market share
from blast furnace producers in the U.S. As EAF steel producers
expand into higher value-added steel products, they will require a
higher quality, iron ore-based metallic, such as HBI, to produce
higher quality steel. Cliffs' strategy is to become a critical
supplier of HBI to EAFs, and it began construction on its Toledo
HBI plant as part of that strategy.

Cliffs spent approximately $1 billion to construct the HBI plant
and production of HBI began in December 2020. Cliffs expects annual
capacity to be approximately 1.9 million tonnes once the plant is
fully operational. HBI can also be used internally by AK Steel's
and ArcelorMittal USA's blast furnaces to improve productivity.

Pension Obligations: Through the AM USA acquisition, CLF's acquired
a significant amount of pension obligations. Pension obligations
were underfunded by approximately $1.2 billion at YE21. While
manageable currently, the fixed costs wear on cash flow and can be
particularly detrimental during low points in the cycle.

Strong Operational Ties: Fitch has equalized the IDRs of Cliffs and
AK Steel given the vertical integration between the entities, which
results in strong operational and strategic ties. Fitch believes AK
Steel will continue to account for a meaningful portion of Cliffs'
iron ore production. Fitch views Cliffs' financial performance as
linked to AK Steel's, as the steel and manufacturing segment will
account for the majority of the combined company's sales.
Additionally, certain Cliffs notes benefit from guarantees from AK
Steel and some subsidiaries, providing legal ties between the
entities. Fitch believes additional borrowing will be at the Cliffs
level and expects the remaining AK Steel debt to be redeemed.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Cliffs is comparable in size but less diversified compared with
integrated steel producer United States Steel Corporation
(B/Positive). Cliffs is larger compared with EAF long steel
producer Commercial Metals Company (BB+/Stable) in terms of steel
capacity, although Cliffs has historically had less favorable
credit metrics. Cliffs is also larger in terms of annual capacity,
although has historically less favorable credit metrics compared
with EAF producer Steel Dynamics, Inc. (BBB/Stable).

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Annual steel shipments of approximately 17 million tons;

-- Capex of approximately $650 million per year over the rating
    horizon;

-- No dividends in 2021, dividend reinstated in 2022;

-- No additional acquisitions or share repurchases through the
    rating horizon.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Mid-cycle total debt to EBITDA expected to be sustained below
    2.5x;

-- EBITDA margins sustained above 10%;

-- Improved pension funding status;

-- Debt repayment leading to gross debt of around $4.0-$4.5
    billion.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Total debt to EBITDA sustained above 3.5x;

-- EBITDA margins sustained below 8.5%;

-- Significantly weaker steel fundamentals resulting in
    materially lower than expected FCF generation.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Solid Liquidity: As of June 30, 2021, CLF had $73 million in cash
and cash equivalents, and $1.595 billion available under its $3.5
billion ABL credit facility due 2025. The ABL credit facility
matures in 2025, or 91 days prior to the stated maturity date of
any portion of existing debt if the aggregate amount of existing
debt that matures on the 91st day is greater than $100 million.

The ABL credit facility is subject to a springing 1.0x minimum
fixed-charge coverage covenant when availability is less than the
greater of (i) 10% of the lesser of (a) the maximum ABL amount
(currently $3.5 billion) and (b) the borrowing base; and (ii) $100
million. CLF has no material maturities until 2024, but it has
pension expense obligations.

ISSUER PROFILE

Cleveland-Cliffs is an integrated producer of steel, the largest
flat-rolled producer of steel and largest producer of iron ore
pellets in North America.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


CMA LOGISTICS: Unsecureds to Get 100% of Profit from 20 Quarters
----------------------------------------------------------------
CMA Logistics, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Indiana a Combined Small Business Chapter 11
Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement dated September 30,
2021.

The Debtor was formed and began operating in 2015 under its then
owner, Curt Baumgartner, as part of a dual-purpose operation that
was broken down between freight brokerage (CMA Freight Services,
LLC) and trucking services (CMA Logistics, LLC). For purposes of
the financial resources and obligations identified and addressed by
this Plan, both companies' interests are referred to and treated as
the Debtor's.

Unfortunately, the legal separation between the two entities was
never clear and the Schedules properly listed freight services as a
d/b/for this Debtor. Despite that, the only operation conducted by
the Debtor now is over the road long haul service business
utilizing its owned and leased rolling stock.

Cash generated by ongoing operations shall first be used to fund
administrative expenses, including professional and case Trustee
fees and expenses. The Plan pays priority claims in accordance with
the treatment allowed under the Code. Given their size such payment
will consume much of the cash available to creditors. After
satisfaction of these claims, general unsecured creditors shall be
paid pro rata out of all remaining Plan payments.

The Plan shall last for 59 months following the first payment made
under it, which is due within 30 days of the date the Confirmation
Order becomes a Final Order. Given the liquidation value of the
company, the Plan could be as short as 36 months, but the Debtor
has elected to offer creditors a full five-year term.

The Plan will treat claims as follows:

     * Class 2.1 consists of the claim of BMO Harris Bank, NA. On
August 6, 2021, the Debtor and BMO Harris Bank, NA entered that
certain Agreed Entry Resolving BMO's Motion for Relief from Stay,
which Agreed Entry was approved by the Court by it Order Approving
Agreed Entry, on August 9, 2021. All of the terms and conditions of
the Agreed Entry are deemed to be incorporated in this Plan as if
set forth verbatim and the Debtor adopts such terms as the
treatment of BMO's secured claim.

     * Class 2.2 consists of the claim of Midland States Bank. The
Debtor has 2 tractors financed by Midland States Bank ("MSB") that
the Debtor believes are slightly undersecured. MSB shall be deemed
to have an Allowed Secured Claim, (the "Allowed Secured Claim of
MSB") equal to amount of such creditor's claim as shown in its
proof of claim or $120,000 per tractor. The Debtor shall pay the
Allowed Secured Claim of MSB by re-amortizing the entire balance
due such creditor as of the Effective Date and paying that amount
over the remaining useful life of the collateral using prime plus 2
or a 5.25% annual interest rate. Payments continue until the
Allowed Secured Claim of MSB is paid in full.

     * Class 3 consists of Allowed General Unsecured Claims which
claims shall receive a pro rata payment after satisfaction of the
superior class claims treated under the Plan up to the full amount
of the allowed claim of such creditor. Such claims shall be
allowed, settled, compromised, satisfied and paid by a quarterly
distribution of 100% of the net profits of the Debtor for the
preceding quarter calculated in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, less such priority payments, for 20 quarters
following confirmation of the Plan. Payment of such claims is
expressly subordinate to the payment of priority claims under this
Plan. Class 3 is impaired and is entitled to vote on the Plan.

     * Class 4 consists of the Equity Interests, which interests
shall be retained by existing interest owners.

Debtor shall continue to operate its business in accordance with
the projection of income, expense and cash flow, and shall pay its
net after tax cash profit to satisfy creditor claims.

A full-text copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement
dated September 30, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3l8WggA
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorney for the Debtors:

     KC Cohen
     KC Cohen, Lawyer, PC
     151 N. Delaware St., Ste. 1106
     Indianapolis, IN 46204
     Phone: 317-715-1845
     kc@esoft-legal.com

CMA Logistics, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, was
formed and began operating in 2015 under its then owner, Curt
Baumgartner, as part of a dual-purpose operation that was broken
down between freight brokerage (CMA Freight Services, LLC) and
trucking services (CMA Logistics, LLC).            


CRC BROADCASTING: Gets Interim Cash Access Until Oct 31
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Paul Sala of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Arizona approved the stipulation between CRC Broadcasting Company,
Inc. and Desert Financial Federal Credit Union, allowing the Debtor
to use cash collateral on an interim basis until October 31, 2021,
pursuant to the budget for relocation expenses of AM station KQFN
1580 in accordance with the contracts with Kintronic Labs, Inc,
Max-Gain Systems, Inc., and La Rue Communications.
  
The budget, which covers the period from October 1 to 30, provided
for $96,000 in total expenses.

In consideration for the use of cash collateral, Desert Financial
is granted replacement liens on all of the Debtor's property after
the Petition Date, to the extent of diminution in value of Desert
Financial's interest in the estate property.  Desert Financial also
is granted a superpriority administrative expense claim to the
extent the replacement liens are not adequate to protect for any
diminution of collateral.

Moreover, Desert Financial is granted a superpriority
administrative expense claim under Bankruptcy Code section 507(b)
(without the need to file or request any such claim with the
Bankruptcy Court or otherwise), to the extent Replacement Liens
above do not adequately protect Desert Financial for any diminution
of collateral, including Cash Collateral.

The Debtor owes Desert Financial under certain loan documents no
less than $1,477,964 resulting from its own debts and the debts of
affiliated debtor, CRC Media West, LLC that it guaranteed and
secured.

Crestmark Vendor Finance, a division of MetaBank has asserted that
it has a perfected, first priority purchase money security interest
in certain specified collateral pursuant to Equipment Finance
Agreement # 153522 entered into between Regents Capital Corporation
and CRC Media West, LLC, which Equipment Finance Agreement was
subsequently assigned by Regents Capital to Crestmark.

The Debtor asserts that in April 2020 it received a $10,000 advance
under the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Emergency Advance program
(however, its loan application was ultimately denied). Desert
Financial asserts that such Advance now constitutes Cash
Collateral, which is disputed by the Debtor. The Debtor proposes to
use $5,000  of the Advance to purchase an air conditioner unit
discussed between the Parties. Desert Financial approves the
purchase of the Unit, which constitutes collateral of Desert
Financial under the Loan Documents. The Debtor may use the
remaining $5,000 of the Advance solely for the expenses set forth
in the Budget.

A copy of the stipulated order is available for free at
https://bit.ly/2YjDmKG from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About CRC Broadcasting Co.

CRC Broadcasting Company, Inc., a broadcast media company based in
Scottsdale, Ariz., filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 20-02349) on March 6,
2020, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.

Affiliate CRC Media West, LLC also filed for Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 20-02352) on March 6, 2020, listing under
$1 million in both assets and liabilities.

The cases are jointly administered.

Judge Paul Sala oversees both cases.

Allan D. NewDelman, Esq., at Allan D. NewDelman, P.C., is the
Debtors' legal counsel.

Squire Patton Boggs (US)LLP represents Desert Financial Federal
Credit Union, secured creditor.

Desert Financial Federal Credit Union, as secured creditor, is
represented by Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP.



DAISEY LLC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------
Debtor: Daisey, LLC
        15972 N. 115 Way
        Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Business Description: Daisey, LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate
                      debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
                      101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona

Case No.: 21-07517

Debtor's Counsel: Lawrence D. Hirsch, Esq.
                  PARKER SCHWARTZ, PLLC
                  7310 N. 16th Street
                  Suite 330
                  Phoenix, AZ 85020
                  Tel: 602-282-0477
                  Fax: 602-282-0478
                  Email: lhirsch@psazlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Hugh Anderson as managing member.

The Debtor stated it has no creditors holding unsecured claims.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/ANQSFLQ/DAISEY_LLC__azbke-21-07517__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


DALTON CRANE: Seeks to Hire Martin & Drought as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dalton Crane, L.C. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas to employ Martin & Drought, P.C.
to serve as legal counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The hourly rates charged by Martin & Drought range from $200 to
$500 for attorneys' services and from $100 to $125 for paralegal
services.  The hourly rate for lead attorney, Michael Colvard,
Esq., is $450.

Mr. Colvard disclosed in a court filing that his firm does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Michael G. Colvard, Esq.
     Martin & Drought, P.C.
     Weston Centre
     112 East Pecan Street, Suite 1616
     San Antonio, TX 78205
     Tel: (210) 220-1334
     Fax: (210) 227-7924
     Email: mcolvard@mdtlaw.com

                      About Dalton Crane L.C.

Edna, Texas-based Dalton Crane, L.C. filed its voluntary petition
for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 21-33218) on
Oct. 1, 2021, listing as much as $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Joshua Dalton, chief executive officer, signed the
petition.  Michael G. Colvard, Esq., at Martin & Drought, P.C.
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


DAVEY KENT: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 2% in Plan
-----------------------------------------------------
Davey Kent, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Ohio a Plan of Reorganization under Subchapter
V dated September 30, 2021.

Debtor Davey Kent, Inc. is a corporation organized under Ohio law
and headquartered in Kent, Ohio. Davey Kent does business as Davey
Drill and operates a business focused on the design, manufacturing,
repair and sale of parts and equipment related to commercial drill
rigs used for civil and geotechnical drilling.

This Plan proposes to pay creditors of the Debtor from the future
cash flow of its business operations.

Non-priority unsecured Creditors holding Allowed Claims will
receive distributions, which the Debtor has valued at approximately
2 cents on the dollar. This Plan provides for full payment of
administrative expenses and priority claims.

The Plan will treat claims as follows:

     * Class 1 consists of all Allowed Priority Claims. Unless it
agrees to a different treatment, any claimant holding an Allowed
Claim in this Class shall be entitled to be paid in full, in
deferred pro-rata payments, on the allowed amount of the claim over
the length of this Plan.

     * Class 2 consists of the Claims of Hometown Bank. Debtor
Davey Kent has been making certain adequate protection payments on
Hometown Bank's Claim pursuant to terms set forth in the Agreed
Order Approving Continued Use of Cash Collateral and Providing
Adequate Protection dated July 23, 2021. To the extent the
collateral securing the Allowed Claim of HTB has a value in excess
of the amount of the Allowed Claim, the Reorganized Debtor will pay
HTB in full in monthly principal and interest installments either
as set forth in its agreement or over 5 years with an interest rate
of 3% per annum, whichever is later.

     * Class 3 consists of General Unsecured Claims. Allowed Claims
in Class 3 will be paid annually pro-rata from the Reorganized
Debtor's projected Disposable Income after and subject to the
payment of Administrative Expenses and Priority Tax Claims, and
payments to all other Classes, but pro-rata with the Unsecured
portions of those Allowed Claims as provided in the Class
treatments disclosed. No interest shall accrue on any Claims in
this Class.

     * Class 4 consists of the unsecured Allowed Claim of Medical
Mutual. Pursuant to the authority granted the Debtor by prior order
of the Court, Medical Mutual will be paid in full on payments terms
agreed upon between Medical Mutual and Debtor.

     * Class 5 consists of the outstanding stock issued by the
Debtor, owned by J. Thomas Myers, II. Confirmation of this Plan
shall cause all prepetition stock issued by Debtor Davey Kent to be
revested in and retained by those holding an interest in the
outstanding stock of Debtor Davey Kent as of the Petition Date and
shall be subject to and based upon the terms and conditions as they
existed on the Petition Date including under any Articles of
Incorporation, ByLaws, and other duly executed corporate
documents.

The Plan will be implemented and funded through the future business
operations of the Reorganized Debtor. As a part of its
reorganization, the Reorganized Debtor does not contemplate the
sale of any assets except that assets may be sold to the extent
that it is later determined they are no longer of value to the
Reorganized Debtor's business operation or their useful life for
the Reorganized Debtor has expired.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Sept. 30, 2021,
is available at https://bit.ly/3BaggVD from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

                      About Davey Kent Inc.

Davey Kent, Inc., a manufacturer of industrial machinery in Kent,
Ohio, filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Case No. 21-51022) on July 2, 2021, listing as much as $10 million
in both assets and liabilities.  Davey Kent President J. Thomas
Myers, II signed the petition.

Judge Alan M. Koschik oversees the case.

Brouse McDowell, LPA and Escott & Company, LLC serve as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel and accountant, respectively.


DELTA AIR: Supreme Court Declines Pilots' Benefits Case vs. PBGC
----------------------------------------------------------------
Amanda Ottaway of Law360 reports that the U.S. Supreme Court
declined Monday, Oct. 4, 2021, to hear a group of former Delta
pilots' argument that lower courts afforded the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corp. too much leeway when they nixed a lawsuit claiming
the agency's handling of their retirement plan cost them millions.


The justices declined the pilots' June petition for writ of
certiorari without explanation except to note that Justice Brett
Kavanaugh didn't take part.  Justice Kavanaugh previously sat on
the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which the suit passed through.

As reported in the TCR, the D.C. Circuit in February 2021 rejected
a group of Delta Air
Lines pilots' push to rethink a panel decision that upheld the
dismissal of a suit seeking $544 million in pension benefits.  The
appeals judges denied an en banc rehearing request from the pilots,
who want to revive their class action saying the PBGC overstepped
its authority once it took over their pension plan in 2006,
following
Delta's bankruptcy.  The pilots were hoping the full circuit would
overturn precedent that grants the PBGC power to interpret benefits
laws but that they claim is misguided and increasingly out of
date.

                       About Delta Air Lines

Atlanta, Georgia-based Delta Air Lines provides scheduled air
transportation for passengers and cargo throughout the United
States, and around the world.  

Northwest and 12 affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection on
Sept. 14, 2005 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-17930). On May 21,
2007, the Court confirmed the Northwest Debtors' amended plan.
That amended plan took effect May 31, 2007.

Delta and 18 affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection on Sept.
14, 2005 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 05-17923).  Marshall S.
Huebner, Esq., at Davis Polk & Wardwell, represented the Delta
Debtors in their restructuring efforts. On April 25, 2007, the
Court confirmed the Delta Debtors' plan.  That plan became
effective on April 30, 2007.

On Dec. 31, 2009, Northwest Airlines, Inc., merged with and into
Delta.


DENARDO CAPITAL: Gets OK to Hire Rosewood as Real Estate Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------------
DeNardo Capital Management, LLC and DeNardo Capital II, LLC
received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York to hire Rosewood Realty Group as their real
estate advisor.

The firm will pursue both the bankruptcy sale or refinancing of
DeNardo Capital II's real property in Irvington, N.Y.

Rosewood will be compensated as follows: 2 percent of the aggregate
amount of financing or 1 percent if the counterparty was not
introduced to the Debtors by the firm in the event that the
refinancing is successful; and 4 percent of the gross purchase
price in the event that the bankruptcy sale is successful.  

In the event that the Debtors' secured creditor is the winning
bidder at the bankruptcy auction, Rosewood will receive a flat fee
of $50,000.  The firm is also entitled to up to $5,000 in
reimbursement of marketing expenses in the event of a sale to
either the secured creditor or a third-party.

As disclosed in court filings, Rosewood is a "disinterested person"
as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Greg Corbin
     Rosewood Realty Group
     38 E 29th St 5th floor
     New York, NY 10016
     Phone: (212) 359-9900/(212) 359-9904
     Email: Greg@rosewoodrg.com

                       About DeNardo Capital

DeNardo Capital Management, LLC is the sole member of DeNardo
Capital II, LLC, which owns a residential development project in
Irvington, N.Y.  

DeNardo Capital Management and DeNardo Capital II filed petitions
for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 21-22098)
on Feb. 16, 2021.  At the time of the filing, DCM listed as much as
$10 million in both assets and liabilities while DCII listed as
much as $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Sean H.
Lane oversees both cases.

Kirby Aisner & Curley, LLP, led by Dawn Kirby, Esq., and Rosewood
Realty Group serve as the Debtors' legal counsel and real estate
advisor, respectively.


DENARDO CAPITAL: Oct. 14 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
------------------------------------------------------
On Sept. 30, 2021, DeNardo Capital Management LLC ("DCM") and
DeNardo Capital II LLC, ("DCII," together with DCM, the "Debtors")
filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York an Amended Disclosure Statement and Plan of
Reorganization.

On Oct. 4, 2021, Judge Sean H. Lane ordered that:

     * Oct. 14, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. is the telephonic hearing to
consider entry of an order approving the Disclosure Statement and
confirming Plan.

     * Oct. 11, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. is fixed as the last day to
submit Ballots for accepting or rejecting the Plan to be counted as
votes.

     * Oct. 11, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. is fixed as the last date for
filing and serving any written objections to approval of the
Disclosure Statement, as amended, and confirmation of the Plan.

A copy of the order dated October 4, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3mooNy1 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtors:

     Dawn Kirb
     KIRBY AISNER & CURLEY LLP
     700 Post Road, Suite 237
     Scarsdale, New York 10583
     Tel. No.: (914) 401-9500
     E-mail: dkirby@kacllp.com

                      About DeNardo Capital

DeNardo Capital II LLC owns a residential development project
located in Irvington, N.Y.  DeNardo Capital Management LLC is its
sole member.

DeNardo Capital Management LLC and affiliate DeNardo Capital II LLC
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case Nos.
21-22098) on Feb. 16, 2021.  DCM estimated at least $10 million in
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  Kirby Aisner &
Curley LLP, led by Dawn Kirby, Esq., serves as counsel to the
Debtors.


DETOUR PLUMBING: Seeks to Hire Anand Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Detour Plumbing Services Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to employ
Anand Law, PC to serve as legal counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's services include:

     a. advising the Debtor generally regarding matters of
bankruptcy law and the U.S. Trustee Guidelines relating to the
operation of the Debtor's business during the pendency of its
bankruptcy case;

     b. representing the Debtor in the bankruptcy case, adversary
proceedings, contested matters and in any action in other
California court where the right of the estate may be litigated or
otherwise affected;

     c. advising the Debtor concerning its rights and remedies in
connection with the estate's assets and claims of creditors;

     d. assisting the Debtor in the preparation of bankruptcy
schedules, statements of financial affairs, lists and other
disclosure documents;

     e. examining witnesses, claimants or adverse parties as the
case may require;

     f. assisting in the preparation of legal papers;

     g. representing the Debtor in negotiations with creditors,
lessors, lessees, potential lending sources, governmental entities
and other parties in interest;

     h. assisting the Debtor in the formulation, preparation and
execution of a program to maximize the value of the assets of the
estate; and

     i. advising the Debtor regarding other legal questions and
problems that may arise in or in connection with the case.

The firm received a retainer in the amount of $16,470.

As disclosed in court filings, Anand Law is a disinterested person
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Brandon J. Anand, Esq.
     Anand Law PC
     5455 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1609
     Los Angeles, CA 90036
     Tel: 323-325-3389
     Email: brandon@anandlaw.com
                 admin@anandlaw.com

                About Detour Plumbing Services Inc.

Detour Plumbing Services, Inc. filed a petition for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 21-17066) on Sept. 8, 2021,
listing up to $50,000 in assets and up to $500,000 in liabilities.
Judge Sandra R. Klein oversees the case.  Brandon J. Anand, Esq.,
at Anand Law, PC represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


E.L. SERVICES INC: Seeks to Hire Vaught & Boutris as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------------
E.L. Services, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California to employ Vaught & Boutris,
LLP as its accountant and tax advisor.

The firm's services include:

     a. preparing the Debtor's federal and state tax returns;

     b. advising the Debtor on the tax consequences of any
transactions occurring in its bankruptcy case and on the
preparation of budgets, cash flow projections and monthly operating
reports; and

     c. providing tax advice and addressing EDD payroll account
issues.

Vaught & Boutris' hourly rates range from $350 to $500.  The firm
received a post-petition retainer of $10,000.

As disclosed in court filings, Vaught & Boutris does not hold any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its creditors or estate.

The firm can be reached at:

     Basil J. Boutris, Esq.
     Jon R. Vaught, Esq.
     Vaught & Boutris LLP
     80 Swan Way, Suite 320
     Oakland, CA 94621
     Tel: (510) 430-1518
     Fax: (510) 382-1166
     Email: basil@vaughtboutris.com
            jon@vaughtboutris.com

                      About E.L. Services Inc.

E.L. Services, Inc., a landscape and maintenance company in Dublin,
Calif., filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Calif. Case No. 21-41087) on Aug. 25, 2021, disclosing up to
$100,000 in assets and up to $10 million in liabilities.  Steven P.
Baca, general manager, signed the petition.  

Judge William J. Lafferty oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Kornfield, Nyberg, Bendes, Kuhner & Little P.C.
as its legal counsel and Vaught & Boutris, LLP as its accountant
and tax advisor.


EG GLOBAL: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------
Debtor: EG Global, LLC
        5665 Atlanta, Hwy
        Suite 102B-204
        Alpharetta, GA 30004

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia

Case No.: 21-21054

Debtor's Counsel: William A. Rountree, Esq.
                  ROUNTREE, LEITMAN & KLEIN, LLC
                  Century Plaza I
                  2987 Clairmont Road, Ste 350
                  Atlanta, GA 30329
                  Tel: 404-584-1238
                  Fax: 404 704-0246
                  E-mail: swenger@rlklawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Micheal T. Houston as CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's three unsecured creditors is available for
free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/PHTHYOY/EG_Global_LLC__ganbke-21-21054__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


EG VENTURES: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: EG Ventures, LLC
        5665 Atlanta Hwy
        Suite 102B-204
        Alpharetta, GA 30004

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia

Case No.: 21-21057

Debtor's Counsel: William A. Rountree, Esq.
                  ROUNTREE, LEITMAN & KLEIN, LLC
                  Century Plaza I
                  2987 Clairmont Road, Ste 350
                  Atlanta, GA 30329
                  Tel: 404-584-1238
                  Fax: 404 704-0246
                  E-mail: swenger@rlklawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Michael T. Houston as CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's three unsecured creditors is available for
free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/YUH7CYA/EG_Ventures_LLC__ganbke-21-21057__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ELITE AVIATION: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Elite Aviation Products, Inc.
          d/b/a EAP Inc.
        9 Studebaker Drive
        Irvine, CA 92618

Business Description: Elite Aviation Products, Inc. is a design,
                      engineering, manufacturing and technology
                      company within the aerospace industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 21-12417

Judge: Hon. Theodor Albert

Debtor's Counsel: David L. Neale, Esq.
                  LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
                  2818 La Cienega Avenue
                  Los Angeles, CA 90034
                  Tel: (310) 229-1234
                  E-mail: dln@lnbyb.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Zeeshawn Zia as president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's two unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/DGYM3BA/Elite_Aviation_Products_Inc__cacbke-21-12417__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ELITE ENGINEERING: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Elite Engineering Services Inc.
        9 Studebaker Drive
        Irvine, CA 92618

Business Description: Elite Engineering Services Inc. is part of
                      Elite Aerospace Group, an advanced design,
                      engineering, manufacturing and technology
                      company within the aerospace industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 21-12418

Judge: Hon. Erithe A. Smith

Debtor's Counsel: David L. Neale, Esq.
                  LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
                  2818 La Cienega Avenue
                  Los Angeles, CA 90034
                  Tel: (310) 229-1234
                  E-mail: dln@lnbyb.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Zeeshawn Zia as president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's four largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/RZ47D4A/Elite_Engineering_Services_Inc__cacbke-21-12418__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ELITE METAL: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Elite Metal Manufacturing Inc.
        9 Studebaker Drive
        Irvine, CA 92618

Business Description: Elite Metal Manufacturing Inc. is part of
                      Elite Aerospace Group, an advanced design,
                      engineering, manufacturing and technology
                      company within the aerospace industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Banrkuptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 21-12419

Judge: Hon. Erithe A. Smith

Debtor's Counsel: David L. Neale, Esq.
                  LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
                  2818 La Cienega Avenue
                  Los Angeles, CA 90034
                  Tel: (310) 229-1234
                  E-mail: dln@lnbyb.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Zeeshawn Zia as president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's two unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/WEGAKLI/Elite_Metal_Manufacturing_Inc__cacbke-21-12419__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ENSEMBLE RCM: S&P Places 'B' ICR on Watch Positive on Announced IPO
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placing all of its ratings on Ensemble RCM LLC,
including its 'B' issuer credit rating and its 'B' issue-level
rating on the company's secured debt, on CreditWatch with positive
implications.

The CreditWatch placement reflects the potential for an upgrade if
the company successfully completes its IPO and uses the proceeds to
repay debt. Under this scenario, S&P would also need to be more
certain that the company plans to maintain leverage below 5x.

A successful IPO will likely provide the company with sufficient
proceeds to substantially reduce its debt, including potentially
improving its leverage below 5x. The CreditWatch placement follows
the announcement that Ensemble has filed a preliminary prospectus
for an IPO. S&P expects the transaction to close in 2021. It
expects Ensemble to use the proceeds from the IPO to repay a
portion of the $1,441.3 million outstanding under the company's
term loan as of June 30, 2021.

S&P said, "Clarity around its sponsor control and financial
policies as a public company remain important considerations as we
assess the likelihood that it will be able to sustain leverage of
less than 5x.An upgrade is also dependent on our assessment of the
company's financial policies following the IPO. Additionally, the
level of ownership and influence that its financial sponsor will
retain following the transaction will be an important
consideration.

"We plan to resolve the CreditWatch placement when the transaction
closes, which we expect will happen by the end of the year or in
2022. The CreditWatch listing reflects the potential for an upgrade
if Ensemble uses the IPO proceeds to repay debt and we are more
certain the company plans to maintain leverage below 5x."



ESSA PHARMA: Registers 7.3M Shares Under 2021 Incentive Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
Essa Pharma Inc. filed a Form S-8 registration statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of registering
7,342,788 common shares, no par value, of the company issuable to
eligible employees, officers and directors of the company and
certain other individuals pursuant to the Essa Pharma Inc. 2021
Omnibus Incentive Plan.  

A full-text copy of the prospectus is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1633932/000110465921121976/tm2128744d1_s8.htm

                            About Essa

Vancouver, BC-based Essa Pharma, Inc. -- www.essapharma.com -- is a
clinical stage pharmaceutical company, focused on developing novel
and proprietary therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer in
patients whose disease is progressing despite treatment with
current standard of care therapies, including second-generation
anti-androgen drugs such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide,
and darolutamide.

Essa reported a loss and comprehensive loss of $23.44 million for
the year ended Sept. 30, 2020, a loss and comprehensive loss of
$12.75 million for the year ended Sept. 30, 2019, a loss and
comprehensive loss of $11.63 million for the year ended Sept. 30,
2018, and a loss and comprehensive loss of $4.50 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2017.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$203.52 million in total assets, $3.83 million in total
liabilities, and $199.70 million in total shareholders' equity.


EXPRESS GRAIN: Files Emergency Bid to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------
Express Grain Terminals, LLC and affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Mississippi for authority to use
cash collateral, continue using existing bank accounts and cash
management system, and provide adequate protection.

The Debtors assert that an immediate need exists for the Business
Debtors to use Cash Collateral in order to continue essential
operations, acquire goods and services, and pay other necessary and
essential business expenses.

UMB Bank, N.A., the Debtors' principal secured lender, asserts
various interests in substantially all of the Business Debtors'
personal and real property including, without limitation,
inventory, farm products, and accounts receivable. Further, the
Bank asserts interests in Cash Collateral including, without
limitation, the cash constitutes proceeds of the Collateral and,
therefore, constitutes cash collateral within the meaning of
Bankruptcy Code section 363(a). The Bank has not agreed to the
Debtor's request but negotiations with the Bank are continuing.

The Business Debtors propose to continue their Cash Management
System with the Bank. The Business Debtors will take steps to close
all existing banking accounts at other financial institutions and
centralize their depository accounts with the Bank, including, but
not limited to, any debtor-in-possession accounts that the Business
Debtors may open and will not open any additional accounts at any
other financial institutions without (i) giving adequate notice to
the United States Trustee, the Bank and such other parties as the
Court may direct, and (ii) receiving the express written consent
from the Bank, or Court approval. However, until such time as
accounts are established at the Bank, the Debtors may continue to
use the existing Cash Management System simply as a matter of
convenience and of necessity.

In addition, the Debtors have agreed to an order freezing the
Business Debtors' accounts at BankPlus and directing BankPlus to
transfer all account balances with respect to the Business Debtors
to the DIP Accounts at the Bank, subject to funding the immediate
payroll due October 6, 2021. The obligation to transfer balances to
the DIP Accounts should be ongoing until the accounts at BankPlus
are closed or as otherwise directed by the Court. The Business
Debtors will provide a list of all outstanding payments related to
their accounts at BankPlus to BankPlus and the Bank within two
business days of the entry of an order granting the Motion.

As adequate protection for the Debtors' use of cash collateral, the
Debtors have agreed to provide the Bank replacement security
interests in, and liens on, all post-Petition Date acquired
property of the Business Debtors and the Business Debtors'
bankruptcy estates to the extent of the validity and priority of
such interests, liens, or security interests, if any.

To the extent that the Replacement Liens prove inadequate to
protect the Bank from a demonstrated diminution in the value of the
Bank's collateral position from the Petition Date, the Bank will be
granted an administrative expense claim under section 503(b) with
priority in payment under section 507(b).

A copy of the motion and the Debtors' 10-day budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3BbUXmp from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $12,575,726 in total cash collections for the
period.

                   About Express Grains Terminals

Greenwood, Mississippi-based Express Grain Terminals, LLC, produces
soy products such as oil and biodiesel.

Express Grains Terminals sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Miss. Case No. 21- 11832) on Sept. 29, 2021.  In the petition
signed by John Coleman as member, Express Grains Terminals
estimated assets of between $10 million and $50 million and
estimated liabilities of between $50 million and $100 million. The
Law Offices of Craig M. Geno, PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.



EXTRUSION GROUP: Case Summary & 14 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Extrusion Group, LLC
        5665 Atlanta Hwy
        Suite 102B- 204
        Alpharetta, GA 30004

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia

Case No.: 21-21053

Debtor's Counsel: William A. Rountree, Esq.
                  ROUNTREE, LEITMAN & KLEIN, LLC
                  Century Plaza I
                  2987 Clairmont Road, Ste 350
                  Atlanta, GA 30329
                  Tel: 404-584-1238
                  Fax: 404 704-0246
                  E-mail: swenger@rlklawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $50,000 to $100,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Micheal T. Houston as CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 14 unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/BGSPIVA/Extrusion_Group_LLC__ganbke-21-21053__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


EYECARE PARTNERS: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR on Acquisition Agreement
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed all ratings on EyeCare Partners LLC,
including the 'B' issuer credit rating, 'B' issue level rating on
first-lien debt, and 'CCC+' issue-level rating on second lien debt.
S&P also assigned 'B' and 'CCC+' ratings to the incremental first-
and second-lien debt, respectively. The recovery ratings on first-
and second-lien debt are '3' and '6', respectively.

The negative outlook reflects the company's continued cash flow
deficits and the risk that positive cash flow generation takes
longer than expected to materialize, while leverage remains high.

S&P said, "We view recent news as credit neutral, with the modestly
leveraging acquisitions somewhat offset by strong operating
performance in the first half of 2021.We expect pro forma leverage
of about 8.9x on close of the acquisitions, which is roughly one
turn of leverage higher than prior to the transaction. Despite the
higher leverage, we recognize that EyeCare has emerged from the
peak of the COVID-19 pandemic with most operational metrics such as
office visits and surgical procedure volumes recovered to above
pre-pandemic levels. The company also has adequate liquidity, which
will be further increased by the proposed revolver upsize.

"We expect the company's sales and EBITDA to continue to grow
meaningfully in 2021, benefitting from acquisitions and rebounding
from the pandemic. Through the first half of 2021 the company has
delivered revenue growth of about 80% on a year-to-date basis,
inclusive of acquisitions. Going forward we expect mid-single-digit
organic sales growth. We expect acquisitions to remain a key
contributor to growth, with the acquisitions closing in late 2021,
and approximately $100 million in annual acquisition spend
thereafter. We expect EBITDA margins in the 14%-15% range in 2021
and thereafter, supported by cost-savings benefits from recent
investments in operational initiatives and from lower spending on
such initiatives. These initiatives include revenue cycle
management investments to improve collections capabilities, and an
ERP implementation project.

"We expect a free cash flow deficit in 2021, improving to positive
free cash flow generation in 2022 as non-recurring expenses and
cash outflows roll off. EyeCare has historically generated little
to no free cash flow after one-time items such as acquisition
related expenses, restructuring, and operational initiatives. We
expect the company to generate a cash flow deficit in 2021, before
improving to positive free cash flow in 2022. This year the
company's cash flows are burdened with a variety of nonrecurring
cash outflows, including Medicare advance repayments, a
restructuring, and the ERP implementation and revenue cycle
management initiatives, which we expect to deliver profitability
benefits over time. We expect that lower spending on such items and
continued expansion of revenue and EBITDA will enable the company
to generate over $20 million of free cash flow in 2022."

The negative outlook on EyeCare Partners reflects the risk that
positive cash flow generation takes longer than expected to
materialize, resulting in sustained free cash flow deficits and
elevated leverage.

S&P could lower its rating on EyeCare Partners if its adjusted free
operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt is below 2.5% and adjusted debt
to EBITDA is above 8x with limited prospects for improvement. This
could occur if the company continues to incur expenses related to
acquisitions, operational initiatives, and pandemic response,
leading to EBITDA margin contraction or because of integration or
execution issues related to recent acquisitions. This could also
occur if the company pursues aggressive acquisitions that
substantially increase its leverage while higher interest expense
and integration/transaction costs constrain its cash flow
generation.

S&P could revise its outlook on EyeCare Partners to stable if it
thinks the company will be able generate adjusted free operating
cash flow to debt above 2.5% on a sustained basis while maintaining
adjusted debt to EBITDA below 8x, even after any spending on
operational initiatives and acquisition-related expenses.



FORD STEEL: Nov. 2 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
---------------------------------------------------
On Sept. 29, 2021, debtor Ford Steel, LLC, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas a second
amended disclosure statement and a third amended plan. On October
4, 2021, Judge Eduardo Rodriguez ordered that:

     * Nov. 2, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. is the electronic hearing to
consider the approval of the disclosure statement.

     * Oct. 28, 2021, is fixed as the last day for filing and
serving written objections to the disclosure statement.

A copy of the order dated Oct. 4, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3FnlWhg from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Julie Mitchell Koenig, Esq.
     Cooper & Scully, PC.
     815 Walker, Suite 1040
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: 713-236-6800
     Fax: 713-236-6880
     Email: julie.koenig@cooperscully.com

                      About Ford Steel LLC

Porter, Texas-based Ford Steel, LLC --
http://www.fordsteelllc.com/--is in the business of steel product
manufacturing. It fabricates for a wide variety of industries
including the petrochemical industry, waste water treatment,
transmission communication and broadcast towers, mining, and oil
and gas industries.

Ford Steel filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 20-34405) on Sept. 1,
2020. Herbert C. Jeffries, managing member, signed the petition.
The Debtor had between $1 million and $10 million in both assets
and liabilities. Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Cooper & Scully, PC as bankruptcy counsel. Muskat
Mahony & Devine, LLP, Currin Wuest Mielke Paul & Knapp, PLLC, and
Cantrell & Cantrell, PLLC serve as the Debtor's special counsel.

First Financial Bank, Inc., as lender, is represented by West,
Webb, Allbritton & Gentry, PC.


FOREVER 21: Case Dismissed After Lawyers Agree to Waive Fees
------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill of Bloomberg Law reports Forever 21's Chapter 11 case
is coming to a close after the clothing retailer and its attorneys
struck a deal with the Justice Department to forgo paying case
advisers for some of their services in order to avoid converting it
to Chapter 7.  The U.S. Trustee's Office, the DOJ's bankruptcy
watchdog that pushed for the conversion largely to expedite
creditor payout, agreed over the weekend to drop its motion to
convert.  In exchange, Forever 21's bankruptcy professionals agreed
to waive their fees from July 2020 through the closing of the
case.

                      About Forever 21 Inc.

Founded in 1984 by South Korean husband and wife team Do Won Chang
and Jin Sook Chang and headquartered in Los Angeles, Calif.,
Forever 21, Inc. -- http://www.forever21.com/-- is a fast-fashion
retailer of women's, men's and kids clothing and accessories and is
known for offering the hottest, most current fashion trends at a
great value to consumers. Forever 21 delivers a curated assortment
of new merchandise brought in daily.

Forever 21, Inc. and seven of its U.S. subsidiaries each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12122) on Sept.
29, 2019.  According to the petition, Forever 21 has estimated
liabilities on a consolidated basis of between $1 billion and $10
billion against assets of the same range.  

As of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors operated 534 stores under
the Forever 21 brand in the U.S. and 15 stores under beauty and
wellness brand, Riley Rose.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as legal advisor; Alvarez &
Marsal as restructuring advisor; and Lazard as investment banker;
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local bankruptcy counsel.
Prime Clerk is the claims agent.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors on Oct. 11, 2019.  The committee
is represented by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP and Saul
Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' prepetition
revolving credit facility and the Debtors' DIP ABL financing
facility are Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Richards, Layton &
Finger, PA.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' DIP term
loan facility is Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.

                          *     *     *

In February 2020, the company was purchased by a consortium that
includes Authentic Brands Group, Simon Property Group and
Brookfield Property Partners for $81.1 million. As part of the
deal, ABG and Simon will each own 37.5% of the fast-fashion
retailer, while Brookfield controls the remaining 25% of Forever
21's operating and intellectual property businesses.


FORTEM RESOURCES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Fortem Resources, Inc.
          f/k/a Strongbow Resources, Inc.
              Big Lake Energy Ltd.
        777 N. Rainbow, Suite 250
        Las Vegas, NV 89107

Business Description: The Company is engaged in the acquisition,
                      exploration, and development of oil and gas
                      properties.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nevada

Case No.: 21-14823

Judge: Hon. Natalie M. Cox

Debtor's Counsel: Brett A. Axelrod, Esq.
           FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
                  1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 700
                  Las Vegas, NV 89135
                  Tel: (702) 262-6899
                  Email: baxelrod@foxrothschild.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Marc A. Bruner as chief executive
officer.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/AIE5IQA/FORTEM_RESOURCES_INC__nvbke-21-14823__0003.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/ACJYJDY/FORTEM_RESOURCES_INC__nvbke-21-14823__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


FRIENDSHIP VILLAGE: Fitch Assigns 'BB+' IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'BB+' ratings on the series 2012,
series 2013A, series 2017, and series 2018A revenue bonds issued by
The Industrial Development Authority of the County of St. Louis
Missouri on behalf of Friendship Village of St. Louis (FVSTL).
Fitch has also assigned a 'BB+' Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to
FVSTL.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a pledge of gross revenues of the
obligated group (OG), a mortgage on certain properties and
equipment, and a debt service reserve fund.

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

FVSTL operates in two Missouri markets, Friendship Village of
Sunset Hills (FVSH) and Friendship Village of Chesterfield (FVC).
The rating primarily reflects its high debt burden and stressed
leverage metrics, as a result of the borrowing to finance its
expansion project, coupled with a weak operating risk profile
compounded by the effects of the coronavirus pandemic. However, a
rating in the higher end of the 'BB' category is supported by
FVSTL's robust demand and pricing characteristics as the only life
care community in the market.

FVSTL also has historically strong occupancy rates for independent
living units (ILUs), assisted living units (ALUs) and skilled
nursing facility (SNF) beds. While census levels are likely to
soften over the short term due to disruptions from the coronavirus
pandemic, Fitch believes FVSTL's strong demand indicators should
continue to translate into strong census levels over the longer
term. While sales and fill of the new ILUs was slower than forecast
due to the pandemic, management reports the new ILUs are now fully
sold and indicates stabilization into 2023, which supports Fitch's
expectations for operating performance to improve over time.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Defensibility: 'bbb'

Good Demand Across Two Campuses

FVSTL's 'midrange' revenue defensibility is supported by its
historically stable demand and pricing characteristics. Despite
being in a competitive market, FVSTL's demand for its services
remains strong across both of its campuses and all levels of care,
which is partially driven by its communities being the only life
care (Type-A) life plan community (LPC) in its primary market area.
The recently completed expansion project entailed repositioning its
campuses so that facilities, amenities and services strategically
meets the needs of its residents reinforcing its appeal towards its
targeted demographic.

Operating Risk: 'bb'

Weak Operating Risk Profile Compounded by Coronavirus Pressures

FVSTL's operating risk profile remains weak compounded by ongoing
pandemic pressures. Its large capital repositioning and expansion
projects at both of its campuses was completed in January 2021
ahead of schedule and underbudget.

FVSTL's debt burden remains as originally forecasted. The series
2018 financing increased its debt burden as evidenced by an average
maximum annual debt service (MADS). This equates to a high 30% in
revenues, which is substantially weaker than Fitch's 'BIG' medians
of 16.4%. Debt to net available measured an elevated 48x during the
same period. Fitch expects both metrics to improve following
project stabilization, which should meaningfully boost FVSTL's
total revenues and annual cash flow levels.

Financial Profile: 'bb'

Elevated Debt Profile Compounded by Pandemic Challenges

Despite high capital spending that has stressed FVSTL's leverage
profile, Fitch expects FVSTL's liquidity position to remain stable
during Fitch's stress case scenario, and it is consistent with the
rating level in light of its midrange revenue defensibility and
weaker operating profile. Unaudited FYE 2021 results (as of June
30, 2021) reported $127.4 million in unrestricted cash and
investments which translates into 672 days cash on hand (DCOH) and
39.8% cash to adjusted debt. FVSTL's MADS coverage has averaged
about 1.0x over the last five fiscal years, which is consistent
with the rating level.

Asymmetric Additional Risk Considerations

There are no asymmetric risk factors affecting this rating
determination.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Demonstrated improved capital base measured by cash flow
    levels or unrestricted reserves that result in cash to
    stabilized MADS coverage levels in line with Fitch's 'BBB'
    medians;

-- With the recent project completion, improvement in occupancy
    rates and IL sales will improve FVSTL's operating risk profile

    and lead towards key financial metrics closer to Fitch's 'BBB'
    medians.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Unexpected continued deterioration in cash flow levels or
    unrestricted reserves that result in cash to debt falling
    below 30% or stabilized MADS coverage levels below 1x;

-- While FVSTL does not intend to issue more debt in the near
    term, any additional borrowing would put pressure on the 'BB+'
    rating.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

FVSTL operates in two Missouri markets, Friendship Village of
Sunset Hills (FVSH) and Friendship Village of Chesterfield (FVC).
FVSH and FVC historically operated as distinct entities. However,
in 2017, FVC joined FVSH's existing OG, which is now called FVSTL.
The FVSTL OG also includes FV Operations, LLC (FVO), which was
established to employ personnel working at FVC, FVSH, and other
affiliated entities.

All three OG entities are solely owned by FV Services, Inc., which
also wholly owns FV Management, a management service line of the
system, and FV at Home. FV at Home wholly owns two subsidiaries: FV
at Home - Supportive Service, which provides private duty services
to residents, and FV at Home - Home Health, which provides
Medicare-certified post-acute care services. The non-OG management
service line employs senior management of the system and allocates
costs commensurate with the level of services provided to each OG
member

FVSH owns and operates a life care (Type-A) LPC on 52 acres in
Sunset Hills, MO. As of January 2021, FVSH is comprised of 462 IL
apartments, 44 IL villas, 76 ALUs and SNF building with 144 beds
FVC owns and operates a life care LPC on 37 acres in Chesterfield,
MO. FVC is comprised of 349 IL apartments, 39 IL villas, 60 ALUs,
and 90 SNF beds. The updated unit mix for both campuses reflect
newly added and/or replaced IL/AL/SNF units which increased from
976 to 1,181 combined from FVSTL's expansion project. FVC and FVSH
are located approximately 16 miles apart. Total operating revenues
of FVSTL in FY21 (FYE June 30 2021, unaudited) were $66.9 million.

Revenue Defensibility

FVSTL has historically had strong occupancy rates for its ILUs,
ALUs and SNF beds. However, census levels have softened over the
short term due to the increase in units from FSVTL's expansion
project along with disruptions from the coronavirus pandemic. Over
the last four fiscal years, FVSTL averaged 91% occupancy in its
independent living units (ILUs), but it declined to 86% as of June
2021. Management reported an improvement in occupancy rates at both
campuses as recently as September 2021, due to pent up demand as
well as FSTVL's maximizing sales velocity during periods when
COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. Fitch believes FVSTL's occupancy
will rebound as strong demand indicators should continue to
translate into strong census levels over the longer term.

FVC and FVSH are located approximately 16 miles apart and have
adjacent primary market areas (PMAs), with only a small area of
overlap, and together cover a large portion of the West/Southwest
St. Louis area.

FVSTL is the only Type-A (lifecare) product in its service area.
Overall, the Type-A product and attractive pricing should continue
to support strong ILU demand at both FVSTL campuses. There are five
communities within proximity to FVSTL campuses: Mason Pointe (part
of Lutheran Senior Services, 'BBB'/Stable), Aberdeen Heights,
Laclede Groves, Meramec Bluffs and The Willows. However, these
communities only offer modified fee-for-service (Type-B) residency
agreements and have not demonstrated a material impact on FVSTL's
demand.

Given the ILU resident needs and low saturation needs of the
market, ALU/SNF demand should strengthen moving forward. Moreover,
Missouri's certificate of need requirement for ALUs and SNF beds
has prevented widespread development of the product. As a result,
fewer providers have entered the St. Louis market, and most
long-term care providers are either continuum-based providers or
nursing homes.

FVSTL's average entrance fees are highly affordable relative to
prevailing housing prices in its broad market area and the
community has a demonstrated track record of regular increases to
its monthly service fees.

Operating Risk

FVSTL offers type-A (lifecare)contracts which include unlimited
health services for a consistent monthly fee. Due to the healthcare
liability risk, Fitch views type A facilities as having a higher
operating risk profile relative to facilities that offer type B,
type C or rental contracts.

Over the last three fiscal years, FVSTL has averaged a 108%
operating ratio, 2.1% net operating margin (NOM), and 8.9%
NOM-adjusted (NOMA), which is consistent with Fitch's weaker
assessment of its operating risk. However, Fitch expects FVSTL's
core operations and total cash flows levels to improve following
stabilization of its capital projects.

FVSTL's expansion project was completed ahead of schedule in
January 2021 (and well ahead of expected contingency costs).
Management paid off temporary debt in September 2021 and reported
selling and filling its new 128 ILUs across both campuses. The
first year of project stabilization to occur in FY 2023. This is
slightly behind schedule as management originally planned for full
stabilization by late 2022, but the new ILUs have been sold.

FVSTL's capex has averaged about 400% of depreciation over the last
three years (2018-2021), mostly reflecting the spending on the
expansion projects. Fitch expects near-term capital expenditures to
be limited to proactive infrastructure improvements of the campuses
and demolishing the previous skilled nursing building no longer in
service. Management maintains a capital budget of $3 to 5 million
per year at both of its OG campuses combined. The average age of
plant was a very low 5.5 years as of 2021 (a three-year average of
6.7 years).

FVSTL's MADS is approximately $19.6 million, which equates to a
high 27% of 2021 revenues. Additionally, FVSTL's debt to net
available measured a weak 48x in fiscal 2021, reflecting both its
high leverage position as well as its weaker annual cash flow
levels in fiscal 2020 and 2021 due to disruptions from the
coronavirus pandemic. Fitch expects FVSTL's debt burden to moderate
in the coming years as new revenues from project stabilization.
Original third-party forecasts from its 2018 bond issuance
forecasted MADS equating to a high, but more manageable, 22.6% of
fiscal 2023 revenues, the estimated first full year of project
stabilization.

Financial Profile

Given FSTVL's midrange revenue defensibility, weak operating risk
assessments and Fitch's forward-looking scenario analysis, Fitch
expects key leverage metrics to remain consistent with the 'BB+'
rating, throughout the economic and business cycle.

As of 2021 YTDs, FVSTL had unrestricted cash and investments of
approximately $127 million. This represents about 41% of total
adjusted debt and 672 DCOH at year end 2021. MADS coverage is still
estimated at approximately 1.1x in fiscal 2023 (the first year of
project stabilization), which is adequate for FVSTL's current
rating level. Should cash flow levels underperform for an extended
time following project stabilization that results in coverage lower
than 1x could result in negative pressure.

FVSTL had approximately $320 million in outstanding long-term
permanent debt, which includes: $204 million in series 2018A bonds,
$48 million in series 2017 bonds, $40 million in series 2013A
bonds, and $24 million in series 2012 bonds. Additionally, FVSTL
drew down its $25 million in temporary short-term bank notes in
fiscal 2021 to finance the remaining costs of its capital expansion
and repositioning project. FVSTL fully paid off its short-term
notes with initial entrance fees from its new ILUs in September
2021. FVSTL has no exposure to derivative instruments or a defined
benefit pension plan.

Fitch's baseline scenario, which is a reasonable forward look of
financial performance over the next five years given current
economic expectations, shows FVSTL maintaining operating and
financial metrics that are, albeit thin, consistent with the
current rating and with historical levels of performance (operating
ratios tip over the 100% range and NOMAs in the mid 4% range).
Capital spending should remain level with no additional borrowings
expected now that the 2018 project is completed.

Fitch's baseline scenario assumes an economic stress, which is
specific to FVSTL's revenue growth and asset allocation. Despite
the stress, FVSTL maintains cash-to-adjusted debt levels that are
consistent the 'BB+' rating throughout Fitch's baseline forward
looking scenario and remains adequate at the current rating level
under a potential stress case scenario. MADS coverage remains thin
through 2023, then rebounds as expected. DCOH remains consistently
above 594 days through the base case which is neutral to the rating
outcome.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS: S&P Rates New 2nd-Lien Sec. Notes 'CCC+'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'CCC+' issue-level rating and '5'
recovery rating to Frontier Communications Holdings LLC's proposed
$1 billion second-lien secured notes due 2030. The '5' recovery
rating indicates its expectation for modest (10%-30%; rounded
estimate: 15%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

The company plans to use the net proceeds from these notes to fund
the capital investments (capex) and operating costs associated with
the upgrade of its network to fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) and for
other general corporate purposes.

S&P said, "The 'B+' issue-level rating and '1' recovery rating on
Frontier's existing first-lien debt are unchanged. However, we now
expect modestly higher recovery prospects for first-lien creditors
because we raised our gross default valuation of the company by
about $500 million to reflect its new FTTH investments, which we
believe will be accretive to EBITDA by our 2023 hypothetical
default year. Therefore, we revised our rounded recovery estimate
for the first-lien debt to 95% from 90%.

"The 'B-' issuer credit rating and stable outlook on Frontier are
also unchanged. We expect the additional debt will increase the
company's S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage to about 4x in 2021
from the mid-3x area under our previous base-case forecast. We
believe Frontier's leverage will increase to the mid- to-high-4x
area in 2022 as the incremental EBITDA from its FTTH investments is
offset by ongoing declines in its voice, video, and copper-based
broadband services and lower revenue from government subsidies.
Furthermore, we do not expect any leverage improvement during at
least the first two waves of its build plan, which it expects to
complete by year-end 2025.

"At the same time, we expect Frontier's free operating cash flow
deficits to widen under its aggressive capital spending plan and
significantly increase its external funding needs. Our base-case
forecast assumes that the company funds its capital spending
program with new debt, although it may seek equity from private
investors to help maintain net leverage in line with its mid
3x-area target. Despite our expectation for weaker credit metrics
over the next few years, we believe Frontier's fiber deployment--if
well executed--will help expand its broadband market share and
improve its earnings trends over the longer term."

The company announced plans to speed up the upgrade of its network
to FTTH at its analyst day in August 2021. Under wave 1 of its
accelerated build plan, Frontier is targeting 600,000 fiber builds
to reach 4 million fiber passings by the end of 2021. In wave 2,
the company is aiming for 6 million new fiber locations to reach 10
million fiber passings by year-end 2025. This compares with 3.3
million new locations passed to reach about 6.7 million fiber
passings by year-end 2028 under its previous plan. The accelerated
build-out assumes Frontier will cover about two-thirds of its
footprint with fiber, up from 24% currently. Still, the company is
in the early innings of its multi-year network modernization effort
and will need to prove it can adjust to changes in competitive
dynamics and operating conditions--including, but not limited to,
the supply chain issues currently affecting the wireline sector--to
achieve its long-term goals.



GREATER WORKS: Seeks to Hire KW Atlanta Partners as Broker
----------------------------------------------------------
Greater Works Childcare and Community Development Inc. seeks
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Georgia to employ KW Atlanta Partners as its exclusive listing
broker in connection with the marketing and sale of its real
property in Gwinnett County, Ga.

The firm will receive a commission of 8 percent of the purchase
price.

Bruno Taillefer of Taillefer Commercial Group, an affiliated
licensee of KW Atlanta Partners, disclosed in court filings that
the firm is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Taillefer can be reached at:

     Bruno Taillefer
     Taillefer Commercial Group
     1960 Satellite Boulevard, Suite 1100
     Duluth, GA 30097
     Direct: 770-789-7705
     Office: 678-775-2600

                   About Greater Works Childcare
                     and Community Development

Greater Works Childcare and Community Development Inc., owner of a
day-care facility in Lilburn, Ga., filed a voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 20-72185) on Nov.
30, 2020, listing as much as $1 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Judge James R. Sacca oversees the case.  

Paul Reece Marr, P.C. and Brooks, McGinnis & Company, LLC serve as
the Debtor's legal counsel and accountant, respectively.


GREENSILL CAPITAL: Credit Suisseā€™s Zurich Offices Raided in Probe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Corinne Gretler and Marion Halftermeyer of Bloomberg News report
police raided Credit Suisse Group AG offices in Zurich and
confiscated documents as part of an investigation into whether
investors in funds it ran with Greensill Capital were misled,
complicating efforts by the Swiss bank to move past the damaging
scandal.

In the last week of September 2021's search comes after a criminal
complaint in April 2021 by Switzerland's State Secretariat for
Economic Affairs, or Seco, for violations of a law against unfair
competition, which deals with issues such as false or misleading
advertising. A spokesman for the public prosecutor in Zurich
confirmed that proceedings had been opened against an "exponent" of
Greensill.

                    About Greensill Capital

Greensill is an independent financial services firm and principal
investor group based in the United Kingdom and Australia. It offers
structures trade finance, working capital optimization, specialty
financing and contract monetization. Greensill Capital Pty is the
parent company for the Greensill Group.

Greensill began to unravel in March 2021 when its main insurer
stopped providing credit insurance on US$4.1 billion of debt in
portfolios it had created for clients including Swiss bank Credit
Suisse.

Greensill Capital (UK) Limited and Greensill Capital Management
Company (UK) Limited filed for insolvency in Britain on March 8,
2021. Matthew James Byrnes, Philip Campbell-Wilson and Michael
McCann of Grant Thornton were appointed as administrators.

Greensill Capital Pty Ltd. filed insolvency proceedings in
Australia. Matt Byrnes, Phil Campbell-Wilson, and Michael McCann of
Grant Thornton Australia Ltd, were appointed as voluntary
administrators in Australia.

Greensill Capital Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-10561) on March 25, 2021. Jill M. Frizzley,
director, signed the petition. In the petition, the Debtor listed
assets of between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of
between $50 million and $100 million. The case is handled by Judge
Michael E. Wiles.

In the Chapter 11 case, the Debtor tapped Segal & Segal LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, Mayer Brown LLP as special counsel, and GLC
Advisors & Co., LLC and GLCA Securities, LLC as investment bankers
and financial advisors.  Matthew Tocks is the chief restructuring
officer of the Debtor.  The official committee of unsecured
creditors is represented by Arent Fox LLP.

Greensill Capital (UK) Limited filed a Chapter 15 petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-11473) to seek U.S. recognition of its UK
proceedings on Aug. 18, 2021.  ALLEN & OVERY LLP, led by Laura R.
Hall, is the Debtor's counsel in the Chapter 15 case.


GROW CAPITAL: Delays Form 10-K Filing to Complete Audit
-------------------------------------------------------
Grow Capital, Inc. filed a Form 12b-25 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission notifying the delay in the filing of its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2021.

"We are filing this extension in order to provide more time for our
independent registered public accounting firm to complete the audit
testing and review of our consolidated financial statements and the
notes to those statements.  Results of certain common control
entities which are consolidated into the company's financial
reports require complex analysis of adoption of ASC 606 in order to
comply with the requirements, the data for which is still being
compiled and analyzed," Grow Capital said.

Grow Capital is expecting to report significant increases to both
revenues and expenses during the most current fiscal year ended
June 30, 2021, as compared to June 30, 2020.  This change is
predominantly due to the acquisition of operating subsidiary PERA
LLC in August 2020, and the resulting change in presentation to
include the operations of certain entities under common control.
Upon the acquisition of PERA LLC, the company's reports reflect
combined entities that meet the criteria of having common control
with Grow Capital and its controlled subsidiaries, the operations
of which are included in its consolidated and combined financial
statements.  Further, one of these entities has been required for
the purposes of its financial reporting to adopt ASC 606, the
impact of which requires substantial review and analysis by the
company and our independent registered public accounting firm At
the date of this report, the company's auditors have not yet
finished their testing and review of the consolidated financial
data and therefore the company has not provided quantified
operational results.

                        About Grow Capital

Grow Capital (f/k/a Grown Condos, Inc.) --
http://www.growcapitalinc.com-- was a call center that contracted
out as a customer contact center for a variety of business clients
throughout the United States.  Over time its main business became a
third-party verification service.  While continuing to operate as a
call center, in 2008 the Company expanded its business plan to
include the development of a social networking site called
JabberMonkey (Jabbermonkey.com) and the development of a location
based social networking application for smart phones called Fanatic
Fans.

Grow Capital reported a net loss of $2.35 million for the year
ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.33 million for
the year ended June 30, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company
had $3.50 million in total assets, $13.12 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' and members' deficit of
$9.62 million.

L J Soldinger Associates, LLC, in Deer Park, Illinois, the
Company's auditor since 2017, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated Oct. 13, 2020, citing that the
Company's significant operating losses raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


GRUPO AEROMEXICO: Presents Plan, Disclosures to U.S. Court
----------------------------------------------------------
Grupo AeromƩxico, S.A.B. de C.V. (BMV: AEROMEX) announced Oct. 1,
2021, that it filed, together with its subsidiaries that are
debtors in the Company's Chapter 11 voluntary financial
restructuring process, the Joint Plan of Reorganization, a
disclosure statement  related to the Plan and a motion to approve
solicitation procedures with respect to the Plan.  

The Company intends to file one or more supplements to the Plan on
the schedule set forth in the Plan or as otherwise ordered by the
Court.

A hearing to approve the Disclosure Statement is expected to be
held on or about Oct. 21, 2021.

Upon entry of an order approving the Disclosure Statement, the
Company intends to begin
the process to solicit votes on the Plan.  

The filing of the Plan is a key milestone on the Company's path to
emergence from its Chapter 11 process, and the Company looks
forward to continue to engage with its stakeholders to finalize the
Plan on a consensual basis.  

                    About Grupo Aeromexico

Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. (BMV: AEROMEX) --
https://www.aeromexico.com/ -- is a holding company whose
subsidiaries are engaged in commercial aviation in Mexico and the
promotion of passenger loyalty programs.

Aeromexico, Mexico's global airline, has its main hub at Terminal 2
at the Mexico City International Airport.  Its destinations network
features the United States, Canada, Central America, South America,
Asia and Europe.

Grupo Aeromexico and three of its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11563) on June 30,
2020.  In the petitions signed by CFO Ricardo Javier Sanchez Baker,
the Debtors reported consolidated assets and liabilities of $1
billion to $10 billion.

The Debtors tapped Davis Polk and Wardell LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel, KPMG Cardenas Dosal S.C. as auditor, and Rothschild & Co
US Inc. and Rothschild & Co Mexico S.A. de C.V. as financial
advisor and investment banker.  White & Case LLP, Cervantes Sainz
S.C. and De la Vega & Martinez Rojas, S.C., serve as the Debtors'
special counsel.  Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC is the claims
and administrative agent.  

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors on July 13, 2020.  The committee is represented
by Willkie Farr & Gallagher, LLP and Morrison & Foerster, LLP.


HI CRUSH: Winternitz Completes Liquidation of Surplus Assets
------------------------------------------------------------
Winternitz Industrial Auctioneers & Appraisers on Oct. 4 disclosed
that they have completed the liquidation of surplus assets from Hi
Crush's Sand Mining operations in Whitehall Wisconsin, and are
transitioning to an Auction of remaining assets.  This facility was
constructed in 2014, and was capable of producing nearly 3 million
tons of 20/100 frac sand per year.

The liquidation has been ongoing over the past 4-Months, generating
substantial recovery value for large and complicated production
equipment.  The process has now shifted to the final sales phase of
Auctioning the balance of the assets.  The Auction is to be
conducted on Thursday October 14, 2021.

Winternitz has been known for over 125 years as one of the nation's
most successful industrial liquidation firms. This sale is being
conducted in conjunction with Heritage Global Partners, a leading
global asset and auction advisory firm.

The "like new" assets in this sale includes equipment from both of
Whitehall's Wet Plant and Dry Plant operations:

   -- Impact Crushers
   -- Filter Presses
   -- Radial Stackers
   -- Elevated Overland Conveyors
   -- Trough Conveyors
   -- Vibratory Scalping Screens
   -- Durability Attrition Cell Mills
   -- Gravimetric Weighfeeders
   -- Separators & Slurry Pumps
   -- Bucket Elevators
   -- Plant Support Equipment
   -- Vehicles & Office F, F & E

"Our sales process really shined throughout the liquidation.  We
have been fortunate to generate above market value for our client.
The operations were only active for a few years, and the excellent
condition of the equipment increased the growing demand within the
mining, aggregate and material handling industries." said Charles
Winternitz, President of Winternitz Industrial Auctioneers. "This
sale represents a great opportunity to serve our customers in the
sand mining industry, and also presents a great option for those
who are considering a startup sand mining business," he added.

Inspection of all items included in the auction will be on
Wednesday October 13th.  Please contact Charles Winternitz at
847.729.3380 or via email 320270@email4pr.com.

For more information and a complete listing of all lots, please
visit us online at: http://www.winternitz.com/

                          About Winternitz

Ever since 1894 when Samuel L. Winternitz auctioned items from the
World's Columbian Exhibition in Chicago, Winternitz has been
helping clients obtain the highest recovery value in the
disposition of their assets.  Our innovative thinking, dedicated
values and depth of experience in in the auction business have made
Winternitz a leader in Industrial Auctions and Appraisals.

                   About Heritage Global Partners

As industry pioneers with 150 years of collective industry
experience, HGP has conducted over 5000 auctions in 30 different
countries.



HOME4FAMILIES LLC: Unsecured Creditors Will Get 2.86% of Claims
---------------------------------------------------------------
Homes4FamiIies, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland a Chapter 11 Plan under Subchapter V dated
September 30, 2021.

The Debtor is a limited liability company organized for the purpose
of holding and managing real property.  The Debtor was organized
May 3, 2018 for the purpose of a refinancing transaction that
consolidated ownership of 7 real properties owned by First
Chesapeake Investment Properties, LLC and 2 real properties owned
by MVR Investments, LLC.

On or about June 27, 2019, Wilmington Trust, NA filed suit against
the Debtor in the United State District Court for Maryland seeking
appointment of a receiver and for judgment and possession of
Debtor's 9 properties. On or about September 14, 2020, Wilmington
Trust, NA assigned the note and deed of trust to K & S Eastern,
LLC. K & S Eastern, LLC was substituted as Plaintiff in the US
District Court action against Debtor on October 20, 2020.
Thereafter, K & S Eastern, LLC escalated collection against Debtor
and escalated prosecution of the case against Debtor-leading to
Debtor's Chapter 11 filing.

The value of the property to be distributed under the Plan during
the term of the Plan is not less than the Debtor's projected
disposable income for that same period. Unsecured creditors holding
allowed claims will receive distributions, which the Debtor has
valued at approximately 2.86 cents on the dollar, with adjustments
in this Plan for K&S Eastern, LLC in consideration of a section
1111(b) election, as this Plan is superseding that election, with
K&S Eastern, LLC, in part waiving that election according to the
terms of this Plan. The Plan will govern the new contractual
relationship between K&S Eastern, LLC and the Debtor. The Plan also
provides for the payment of secured, administrative, and priority
claims in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code.

Debtor plans to surrender three of its rental properties to secured
creditor K & S Eastern, LLC; namely, 1702 Lombard Street,
Baltimore, MD and 2507 Francis Street, Baltimore, MD and 429 N.
Washington Street, Baltimore, MD. Surrendering these three
properties to K & S Eastern, LLC will reduce the debt obligation to
this creditor.

As part of this Plan, K&S has agreed to forbear from collecting any
charges other than Principal, Interest, Late Charge and the
Protective Advances referenced as Protective Advance-Tax,
Protective Advance-Insurance, and Protective Advancelegal, and to
waive any further legal fees and expenses incurred through an Order
of Confirmation of this Plan. The sum of Principal, Interest, Late
Charge and the Protective Advances is $954,309.15. If the sum of
the values of the three Properties being deeded to K&S is
subtracted from that sum, the parties agree that the unsecured
claim of K&S will be $673,342.15 ($954,309.15 less $280,967.00.

Debtor's projected disposable income is derived from the rents it
will collect from its 6 units. Debtor's secured payment to K &S
will be used to pay the secured claims of Mayor and City Council of
Baltimore. In month 4, Debtor projects disposable income of $636.00
per month. Debtor projects from month 13 through month through 24,
debtor will have a disposable monthly net income of $818.00. Debtor
projects that from month 25 to 36, it will have a monthly
disposable income of $1,008.00. Debtor projects that from months 37
to 48, it will have a disposable income of $1,197.00 per month.
Finally, from months 49 through 60, Debtor projects a monthly
disposable income of $1,396.00. Debtor's conservative increase in
monthly net income results from a 3% increase in annual rent for
each property.

The estate has no equity to disburse to creditors other than the
proposed disposable income that will fund the debtor's plan. After
payment of the administrative class, Debtor anticipates an
unsecured creditor dividend of approximately 2.86% ($19,293.33) to
class 6 claimant (s) with K&S to also receive the treatment.

The initial source of funding Debtor's plan is through the
surrender of approximately $385,933.00 of real estate to secured
creditor K & S Eastern, LLC. The remaining source of funds shall
come from rental collections from Debtor's units as seen in
Appendix E-2 with the added potential revenue from 3% annual rent
increases.

During the term of this Plan, the Debtor shall submit the
disposable income (or value of such disposable income) necessary
for the performance of this plan to the Subchapter V Trustee/or
Creditors directly and shall pay the Trustee or Creditors. The term
of this Plan begins on the date of confirmation of this Plan and
ends on the 60th month subsequent to that date.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Plan dated September 30,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3A9p7Fu from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for Debtor:

     Damani K. Ingram, Esq.
     Bar No. 26320
     The Ingram Firm, LLC
     5457 Twin Knolls Road
     Suite 301
     Columbia, MD 21045
     P: (410) 992-6603
     F: (410) 992-6671
     E: ingramlawfirm@gmail.com

                      About Homes4FamiIies

Homes4FamiIies, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.  20-20771) on Feb. 14,
2020.  In the petition signed by Mark Jones, president and chief
executive officer, the Debtor disclosed up to $1 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Nancy V. Alquist oversees the case.

Damani K. Ingram, Esq. at the Ingram Firm, LLC is the Debtor's
counsel.

K&S Eastern, LLC, as lender, is represented by:

     Martin H. Schreiber II, Esq.
     Law Office of Martin H. Schreiber II, LLC
     3600 Clipper Mill Road, Suite 201
     Baltimore, MD 21211


ILLINOIS CENTER: $255MM Loan Placed on Servicer Watchlist
---------------------------------------------------------
Julianne Cavaliere, writing for Trepp, reports that the $255.6
million Illinois Center loan was placed on servicer watchlist,
according to the September remittance cycle.  Trepp notes the
first-time comments accompanying the move indicate occupancy was
55.8% in Q2 2021.

The loan is backed by 2.1 million square feet at 111 East Wacker
Drive and 233 North Michigan Avenue in Chicago. The collateral is
mostly office space, alt-hough watchlist comments indicate that the
retail properties at the complex were severely impacted by
COVID-19. The comments also note that some tenants vacated ahead of
their lease expiration dates.

The Illinois Center loan is split across three deals. A $98.3
million slice represents 12.70% of the GSMS 2015-GC34 deal while
another $98.3 million piece comprises 10.97% of CGCMT 2015-GC33. An
additional $59 million piece makes up 6.08% of CGCMT 2015-GC35. All
three deals are part of CMBX 9.

The properties behind the Illinois Center loan were collectively
appraised for $390 million, giving it an LTV of 67. DSCR (NCF) for
the loan was 1.44x in 2020 when occupancy was 67%. Those numbers
were 1.02x and 66%, respectively, for Q1 2021.

According to the Troubled Company Reporter in May, Fitch Ratings
has affirmed 12 classes of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust
(CGCMT) 2015-GC33 commercial mortgage pass-through certificates and
revised two Outlooks to Negative from Stable.  While the majority
of the pool continues to exhibit generally stable performance,
overall loss expectations on the pool have risen primarily due to
the increasing number of Fitch Loans of Concern (FLOCs) as well as
ongoing concerns related to the coronavirus pandemic. Fitch's
current ratings incorpo-rate a base case loss of 6.4%. The Negative
Outlooks on classes D through F, and X-D, reflect losses that could
reach 8.1% when factoring in additional stresses related to the
coronavirus pandemic. Fitch has designated 14 loans (19.9% of pool)
as FLOCs, including three specially serviced loans (12.3%).

The Illinois Center loan (11% of the pool) was among the largest
contributors to the loss.  The loan is secured by two adjoining
32-story office towers lo-cated in the East Loop submarket of the
Chicago CBD. 111 East Wacker, which totals 1.02 million sf, was
built in 1969 and last renovated in 2014; and 233 North Michigan
Avenue, which totals 1.07 million sf, was built in 1972 and last
renovated in 2014. Per the servicer, the YE 2020 NOI DSCR was down
to 1.61x from 2.19x at YE 2019; amortization began in September
2020. YE 2020 NOI was down approximately 10% yoy.

Per the YE 2020 rent roll, the property was 67% leased compared to
72.2%, as of September 2019, and 72.3% at issuance; the occupancy
decline is primarily attributable to the loss of Young & Rubicam
Inc. (3.3% of NRA), which vacated near its lease expiry in 2020.
Approximately 7.2% of the NRA is scheduled to roll over next 12
months. Fitch applied a 7.5% haircut to the YE 2020 cash flow in
its analysis primarily to account for this upcoming tenant roll.


ILLINOIS STAR: 800 Bldg. Valued at $1.5MM, Mall at $1.65MM
----------------------------------------------------------
Illinois Star Centre, LLC, operates a retail shopping center
located at 3000 DeYoung Street, Marion, Illinois 62959.  The Debtor
determined that it would no longer be economically feasible to
continue its business, so it filed a Motion to Reject Unexpired
Leases, which was granted on December 18, 2018.  On January 14,
2020, the Debtor filed a Motion to Sell the Mall.  The Motion to
Sell indicates that the ownership group of the Debtor, who
constitutes the entity Illinois Star 800, LLC, was also seeking to
sell the adjacent real property, the "800 Building", which was not
owned by the Debtor.  The buyer proposed to purchase the Mall and
800 Building for a total price of $3,200,000.  However, the
purchase price did not provide an allocation of the proceeds
between the Mall and the 800 Building.  In the Motion to Sell, the
Debtor requested that the Bankruptcy Court approve an allocation of
the proceeds from the sale of the Mall and 800 Building based upon
evidence at an evidentiary hearing regarding the values of the Mall
and 800 Building.  After no objections were filed to the Motion to
Sell, an order was entered on March 3, 2020 granting the Motion.
Subsequently an Amended Sale Order was entered on June 29, 2020.
The sale closed on July 30, 2020.

The Sale Order requires the Court to determine the value of both
the Mall and the 800 Building.  The Court conducted a valuation
hearing on July 28, 2021.  Appraisers for the City of Marion and
Illinois Star 800 provided testimony as to the value of both the
Mall and 800 Building.

Both appraisers testified that the valuation of real estate is
derived from three approaches to value.  They are the Cost, Income
Capitalization, and Sales Comparison Approaches.  Both appraisers
also agreed that the Cost Approach was not applicable for either
property, so their analyses focused on the Income Capitalization
and the Sales Comparison Approaches. Income Capitalization is based
on an estimate of the property's possible net income.  The Sales
Comparison Approach compares the sales of similar properties to the
subject property, with certain adjustments to determine a value.
Both appraisers used the sale price per square foot as a unit of
comparison for the properties.

Based upon the appraisals and testimony provided at the July 28
hearing, the Court determined that the value of the 800 Building is
$1,550,000, and the value of the Illinois Star Centre Mall is
$1,650,000.

A full-text copy of the Opinion dated Sept. 30, 2021, signed by
Judge Laura K. Grandy of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Illinois, is available at https://is.gd/N6q4R8
from Leagle.com.

                   About Illinois Star Centre

Illinois Star Centre LLC owns the Illinois Star Centre Mall located
at 3000 W. Deyoung Street, Marion. The mall, which is valued at
$5.5 million, offers more than 50 stores and restaurants and serves
the Southern Illinois Community with events that showcase local
talent.

Illinois Star Centre sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case No. 17-30691) on May 4,
2017. At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed $5.6 million in
assets and zero liabilities.

Judge Laura K. Grandy oversees the case.

Carmody MacDonald, P.C. and Hoffman Slocomb LLC are the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel and special counsel, respectively.  The Debtor
tapped Dinan Real Estate Advisors, Inc. to appraise its real estate
located at 3000 DeYoung, Marion, Ill.; and Vista Properties and
Investments to assist in the marketing and sale of the property.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS: Discontinues Pillphone Messaging Platform
------------------------------------------------------------
ImageWare Systems, Inc. announced that, in connection with a review
of its assets, it is discontinuing its pillphone messaging platform
to focus on its Cloud-based, multimodal biometric cybersecurity
solutions and the markets requiring faster, accurate identification
to better secure communities, data and assets against costly
ransomware attacks.

Pillphone has been cleared by the Federal Drug Administration and
is HIPAA compliant and was originally developed utilizing certain
intellectual property acquired from Vocel, Inc. ("Vocel") in 2012.
The intellectual property acquired from Vocel will be placed in a
separate non-operating entity.

                      About ImageWare Systems

Headquartered in San Diego, CA, ImageWare Systems, Inc. --
http://www.iwsinc.com-- provides defense-grade biometric
identification and authentication for access to your data,
products, services or facilities.  The Company delivers
next-generation biometrics as an interactive and scalable
cloud-based solution.  ImageWare brings together cloud and mobile
technology to offer two-factor, biometric, and multi-factor
authentication for smartphone users, for the enterprise, and
across
industries.

Imageware Systems reported a net loss of $7.25 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $11.58 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$8.77 million in total assets, $16.70 million in total liabilities,
$5.20 million in mezzanine equity, and a total shareholders'
deficit of $13.14 million.

San Diego, California- based Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., the
Company's auditor since 2011, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated April 2, 2021, citing that the
Company does not generate sufficient cash flows from operations to
maintain operations and, therefore, is dependent on additional
financing to fund operations.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES: Extends Notes Maturity to Oct. 31
--------------------------------------------------------
Interpace Biosciences, Inc. and Ampersand 2018 Limited Partnership
amended the Ampersand Note on Sept. 29, 2021, to change its
maturity date to the earlier of (a) Oct. 31, 2021 and (b) the date
on which all amounts become due upon the occurrence of any event of
default as defined in the Ampersand Note.  

On Sept. 29, 2021, the Company and 1315 Capital II, L.P. amended
the 1315 Capital Note to change its maturity date in a similar
manner.  Except with respect to their respective maturity dates,
the terms of the Notes are otherwise unchanged.  The Security
Agreement remains in full force and effect, and was not amended in
connection with the amendments to the Notes.

Interpace Biosciences entered into promissory notes with Ampersand
dated Jan. 7, 2021, in the amount of $3 million, and 1315 Capital
II, L.P., in the amount of $2 million, respectively, and a related
security agreement.  On May 10, 2021, the Company amended the
Ampersand Note to increase the principal amount to $4.5 million,
and amended the 1315 Capital Note to increase the principal amount
to $3.0 million.  The maturity dates of the Notes were the earlier
of (a) June 30, 2021 and (b) the date on which all amounts become
due upon the occurrence of any event of default as defined in the
Notes.

On June 24, 2021, the Company and Ampersand amended the Ampersand
Note to change its maturity date to the earlier of (a) Aug. 31,
2021 and (b) the date on which all amounts become due upon the
occurrence of any event of default as defined in the Ampersand
Note.  On June 25, 2021, the Company and 1315 Capital amended the
1315 Capital Note to change its maturity date in a similar manner.

On Aug. 31, 2021, the Company and Ampersand amended the Ampersand
Note to change its maturity date to the earlier of (a) Sept. 30,
2021 and (b) the date on which all amounts become due upon the
occurrence of any event of default as defined in the Ampersand
Note. On Aug. 31, 2021, the Company and 1315 Capital amended the
1315 Capital Note to change its maturity date in a similar manner.

Ampersand holds 28,000 shares of the Company's Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock, which are convertible from time to time into an
aggregate of 4,666,666 shares of the Company's Common Stock, and
1315 Capital holds 19,000 shares of the Company's Series B, which
are convertible from time to time into an aggregate of 3,166,668
shares of the Company's Common Stock.  On an as-converted basis,
such shares would represent approximately 39% and 26% of the
Company's fully-diluted shares of Common Stock, respectively.  As a
result, the Company considers the Sept. 29, 2021 amendments to the
Notes to be related party transactions.

                          About Interpace

Headquartered in Parsippany, NJ, Interpace Biosciences f/k/a
Interpace Diagnostics Group, Inc. -- http://www.interpace.com--
offers specialized services along the therapeutic value chain from
early diagnosis and prognostic planning to targeted therapeutic
applications.  Clinical services, through Interpace Diagnostics,
provides clinically useful molecular diagnostic tests,
bioinformatics and pathology services for evaluating risk of cancer
by leveraging the latest technology in personalized medicine for
improved patient diagnosis and management.  Pharma services,
through Interpace Pharma Solutions, provides pharmacogenomics
testing, genotyping, biorepository and other customized services to
the pharmaceutical and biotech industries.

Interpace Biosciences reported a net loss of $26.45 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $26.74 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the
Company had $43.86 million in total assets, $30.22 million in total
liabilities, and $46.54 million in preferred stock, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $32.9 million.

Woodbridge, New Jersey-based BDO USA, LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2012, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 1, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered operating
losses, has negative operating cash flows and is dependent upon its
ability to generate profitable operations in the future or obtain
additional financing to meet its obligations and repay its
liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come
due.  In addition, the Company has been materially impacted by the
outbreak of a novel coronavirus (COVID-19), which was declared a
global pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


INVO BIOSCIENCE: Signs $2M Stock Purchase Agreement With Paradigm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Invo Bioscience, Inc. entered into a stock purchase agreement with
Paradigm Opportunities Fund, LP, an accredited institutional
investor, pursuant to which the company will issue to such investor
600,703 shares of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share for
a purchase price of $3.329 per share for an aggregate purchase
price of $1,999,740.29.  This transaction is set to close on Nov.
30, 2021.  

The shares will be issued under the exemption from registration
under Section 4(a)(2) and/or Rule 506 of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.  The purchase agreement contains a $250,000
break-up fee whereby if either party fails to close, it will be
required to pay the non-breaching party a fee of $250,000.  The
investor under the purchase agreement also agreed to a one-year
lock up period with respect to the shares.

                       About INVO Bioscience

Sarasota, Florida-based INVO Bioscience, Inc. --
http://invobioscience.com-- is a medical device company focused on
creating simplified, lower-cost treatments for patients diagnosed
with infertility.  The Company's solution, the INVO Procedure, is a
revolutionary in vivo method of vaginal incubation that offers
patients a more natural and intimate experience.  Its lead product,
the INVOcell, is a patented medical device used in infertility
treatment and is considered an Assisted Reproductive Technology
(ART).

Invo Bioscience reported a net loss of $8.35 million in 2020, a net
loss of $2.16 million on $1.48 million in 2019, a net loss of $3.07
million in 2018, and a net loss of $702,163 in 2017.  As of June
30, 2021, the Company had $9.93 million in total assets, $5.57
million in total liabilities, and $4.36 million in total
stockholders' equity.


IPC CORP: S&P Cuts ICR to 'SD' Following Restructuring Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on global
trading communication systems, compliance solutions, and networking
services provider IPC Corp. to 'SD' (selective default) from
'CCC-'. S&P also lowered its ratings on the company's second-lien
debt to 'D' because lenders are receiving less than the original
promise.

The downgrade of the company and its second-lien debt follows IPC's
announcement that it has recapitalized its business by granting 2nd
lien debt holders equity in the company in exchange for eliminating
previous claims. This distressed exchange agreement results in a
reduction of more than $400 million of the company's debt. While
this will improve the company's credit metrics going forward, S&P
believes holders of 2nd lien debt have received less than the
original promise.

As part of the transaction, the company has also repaid in full of
the first-lien term loan using proceeds from 3rd party financing.
Therefore, the rating on the first-lien loan is unaffected.

S&P has immediately withdrawn existing ratings following the
downgrade, as the company's new debt does not require a rating.



J&J ROBINSON: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------
Debtor: J&J Robinson Ventures LLC
        6520 W. County Road 0030
        Corsicana, TX 75110

Business Description: The Debtor is primarily engaged in renting
                      and leasing real estate properties.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas

Case No.: 21-31826

Judge: Hon. Stacey G. Jernigan

Debtor's Counsel: Melissa S. Hayward, Esq.
                  HAYWARD PLLC
                  10501 N. Central Expressway
                  Suite 106
                  Dallas, TX 75231
                  Tel: 972-755-7100
                  Email: mhayward@haywardfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Joe Robinson as member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/JUKYDMA/JJ_Robinson_Ventures_LLC__txnbke-21-31826__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


JHW ALPHIA: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B-' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
U.S.-based JHW Alphia Holdings Inc. reflecting its expectation that
operating performance will gradually improve in the second half of
fiscal 2021. However, execution risks remain and an inability to
improve operating performance could result in a downgrade. As a
result, S&P revised the outlook to negative from stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B-' issue-level
rating on the senior secured debt credit facilities. The recovery
rating remains '3', indicating our expectation for meaningful
recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) in the event of a
default.

"The negative outlook reflects the risk that we could lower the
rating over the next 12 months if profitability continues to
deteriorate." The negative outlook reflects the deterioration in
credit metrics and further risks due to rising costs and operating
inefficiencies. The company's second-quarter fiscal 2021 S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins declined to 4%-4.5% from 6.5%-7% a
quarter ago. This was due to commodity shortages and inflation, ERP
implementation difficulties, and shortage of freight. Leverage for
the 12 months ended June 30, 2021, rose to 9.1x from 8.2x a quarter
ago, highlighting the consequence of the deterioration in
profitability. During second-quarter fiscal 2021, the company's ERP
onboarding caused a lack of visibility on supply, demand, and
inventory, which resulted in an estimated loss of about $6 million
in EBITDA. Furthermore, supply chain problems due to shortages of
freight and increased costs resulted in EBITDA deterioration of $2
million. Despite strong demand the company was unable to fulfill
all orders due to a lack of ingredients, which resulted in
extraneous downtime, and trucking, which resulted in an inability
to both receive ingredients and deliver finished products.

S&P said, "We expect the company to offset material and labor cost
inflation with pricing, though some of it will take hold in fiscal
2022. As such, we could see some more margin pressures in the third
and fourth fiscal quarter 2021. At this time we do not believe the
company's capital structure is unsustainable nor do we believe
liquidity is constrained; however, further deterioration of
profitability is a risk to the ratings. In our base case, we expect
fiscal 2021 leverage of 9.5x-10x improving to 8x-8.5x inclusive of
our treatment of the preferred shares as debt and 6.5x-7x
strengthening to 5.5x-6x without, as ERP issues largely abate and
supply chain difficulties ease, though we recognize that if supply
chain pressures and operating execution persist, profitability
could further deteriorate."

Supply chain constraints could pressure liquidity and cash flow
generation. S&P continues to assess the company's liquidity as
adequate with sources over uses coverage of over 1.6x, although it
believes liquidity could decline rapidly if the company is unable
to resolve its operational and supply chain issues to improve cash
flows and successfully unwind working capital. The company's
inventory levels at quarter end were elevated due to supply chain
and freight difficulties, increasing to about $96 million at the
end of second-quarter fiscal 2021 from $73 million at the end of
first-quarter fiscal 2021. This reflected ERP implementation
problems which resulted in data quality issues, leading to some
service disruption. Additionally, freight shortages meant that
there were insufficient key raw materials at the plants, which led
to excess employee downtime as workers waited for shipments to
complete production and insufficient trucking to ship finished
product out to customers. The increase in inventories resulted from
higher than normal levels of raw materials as key ingredients are
still missing to finish products, and elevated finished goods
levels due to a lack of trucking to move products. Potential
further shortages in certain materials remains a significant
problem as service levels could decline and fixed-cost absorption
deteriorates. This could erode profitability and ultimately
constrain liquidity, which is captured in S&P's negative outlook.

S&P said, "We acknowledge that the company's underperformance is
cost and operational driven, not due to lower demand. We believe
strengthening production and service levels to customers is
essential for restoring the company's profitability. Strong pet
ownership continues to provide demand tailwinds, supporting our
expectation for continued revenue growth. Pet ownership in the U.S.
expanded considerably in 2020 to 70% of households from 67%
according to the American Pet Products Association, which we expect
to result in increased demand for pet food, benefitting Alphia.
Additionally, as new pets grow into adults, their pet food
consumption will increase. According to Euromonitor the dollar
value of the pet food industry grew to $41 billion in 2021 from
$38.2 billion in 2020 and $35.3 billion in 2019. We expect these
tailwinds will help drive high-single-digit top-line growth for
Alphia in 2021 and mid-single-digit growth in 2022, though we
recognize this growth could be constrained by ongoing supply chain
and freight shortages.

"The negative outlook reflects the risk that we could lower the
ratings over the next 12 months if the company is unable to improve
profitability and generate positive free cash flow, resulting in
either constrained liquidity or an unsustainable capital
structure."

S&P believes this could happen if:

-- Profitability continues to deteriorate due to supply chain or
ERP problems;

-- A material loss of customers due to switching production in
house or a significant decline in service levels; or

-- More aggressive financial policy that results in debt-financed
acquisitions or dividends.

S&P could revise the outlook back to stable if:

-- The company is able to return to historical margins through
resolving its supply chain issues and generates positive cash
flow.



JUAREZ BROTHERS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Juarez Brothers Investments, LLC
        1400 S. Union Avenue
        Suite 120
        Bakersfield, CA 93307

Business Description: Juarez Brothers Investments, LLC is part of
                      the specialized freight trucking industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of California

Case No.: 21-12348

Judge: Hon. Jennifer E. Niemann

Debtor's Counsel: Ignacio J. Lazo, Esq.
                  CADDEN & FULLER LLP
                  2050 Main Street, Suite 260
                  Irvine, CA 92614
                  Tel: (949) 788-0827
                  E-mail: ilazo@caddenfuller.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Walter Juarez as member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/7LH5QZY/Juarez_Brothers_Investments_LLC__caebke-21-12348__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


KATERRA INC: Bankruptcy Judge Stops Greensill's Move for UK Lawsuit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Hill, writing for Bloomberg News, reports that U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge David Jones denied a request from Greensill Ltd.
to sue Katerra Inc. in England instead of Texas.

Greensill, the receivables financing firm that collapsed this year,
alleges Katerra owes it about $440 million as a result of shoddy
deals that pre-date Katerra's bankruptcy.

Lawyers for Greensill, which is being liquidated in the U.K., asked
Judge Jones to let the fight play out overseas then return to Texas
to collect payment.

Its lawyers argued that an English court would be better suited to
resolve its claims because they deal with English law and the
company is already undergoing insolvency.

                       About Greensill Capital

Greensill is an independent financial services firm and principal
investor group based in the United Kingdom and Australia.  It
offers structures trade finance, working capital optimization,
specialty financing and contract monetization. Greensill Capital
Pty is the
parent company for the Greensill Group.

Greensill began to unravel in March 2021 when its main insurer
stopped providing credit insurance on US$4.1 billion of debt in
portfolios it had created for clients including Swiss bank Credit
Suisse.

Greensill Capital (UK) Limited and Greensill Capital Management
Company (UK) Limited filed for insolvency in Britain on March 8,
2021.  Matthew James Byrnes, Philip Campbell-Wilson and Michael
McCann of Grant Thornton were appointed as administrators.

Greensill Capital Pty Ltd. filed insolvency proceedings in
Australia.  Matt Byrnes, Phil Campbell-Wilson, and Michael McCann
of Grant Thornton Australia Ltd, were appointed as voluntary
administrators in Australia.

Greensill Capital Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-10561) on March 25, 2021.  Jill M. Frizzley,
director, signed the petition. In the petition, the Debtor listed
assets of between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of
between $50 million and $100 million. The case is handled by Judge
Michael E. Wiles.

In the Chapter 11 case, the Debtor tapped Segal & Segal LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, Mayer Brown LLP as special counsel, and GLC
Advisors & Co., LLC and GLCA Securities, LLC as investment bankers
and financial advisors.  Matthew Tocks is the chief restructuring
officer of the Debtor.  The official committee of unsecured
creditors is represented by Arent Fox LLP.

Greensill Capital (UK) Limited filed a Chapter 15 petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-11473) to seek U.S. recognition of its UK
proceedings on Aug. 18, 2021.  ALLEN & OVERY LLP, led by Laura R.
Hall, is the Debtor's counsel in the Chapter 15 case.

                       About Katerra Inc.

Based in Menlo Park, Calif., Katerra Inc. is a Japanese-funded,
American technology-driven offsite construction company. Katerra
was founded in 2015 by Michael Marks, former chief executive
officer of Flextronics and former Tesla interim CEO, along with
Fritz Wolff, the executive chairman of The Wolff Co. It offers
technology-driven design, manufacturing, and assembly solution for
bathroom pods, door and window, furniture, and modular utility
systems.

Katerra and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 21-31861) on June 6, 2021.  In its
petition, Katerra disclosed assets of between $500 million and $1
billion and liabilities of between $1 billion and $10 billion.

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis, LLP and Jackson Walker, LLP as
bankruptcy counsel; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment
banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as financial and
restructuring advisor; and KPMG, LLP as a tax consultant. Prime
Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors tapped Fox
Rothschild, LLP, as counsel; and FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial
advisor.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP is counsel for SB Investment Advisers
(UK) Limited, DIP lender.

                          *     *    *

Katerra in early August 2021 won court approval to sell factories
in Washington State and California for a total of $71 million.
Blue Varsity LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mercer International
Inc., purchased Katerra's cross-laminated timber factory in
Spokane, Wash. Volumetric Building Companies, a Philadelphia-based
construction company, agreed to buy Katerra's two-year-old factory
in Tracy, Calif.


LEHMAN BROTHERS: Dispute Goes On as Deutsche Makes Legal Bid
------------------------------------------------------------
Lucca de Paoli of Bloomberg Law reports that more than 13 years
after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy, the fight for the last
scraps of its carcass is still going on.

Deutsche Bank AG is leading a last-ditch legal bid to squeeze more
from a bet it made on obscure notes issued by Lehman in the years
before the U.S. bank's collapse.

The German lender is appealing a decision made by a British court
last year, hoping to gain more from its holding of "enhanced
capital advantaged preferred securities" or ECAPS, a series of
subordinated notes Lehman issued via one of its U.K. subsidiaries.


                      About Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. -- http://www.lehman.com/-- was the
fourth largest investment bank in the United States. For more than
150 years, Lehman Brothers has been a leader in the global
financial markets by serving the financial needs of corporations,
governmental units, institutional clients and individuals
worldwide.

Lehman Brothers Holdings filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 08-13555) on Sept. 15, 2008.  Lehman's bankruptcy
petition disclosed US$639 billion in assets and US$613 billion in
debts, effectively making the firm's bankruptcy filing the largest
in U.S. history.  Several other affiliates followed thereafter.

Affiliates Merit LLC, LB Somerset LLC and LB Preferred Somerset LLC
sought bankruptcy protection in December 2009.

The Debtors' bankruptcy cases were assigned to Judge James M. Peck.
Judge Shelley Chapman took over the case after Judge Peck retired
from the bench to join Morrison & Foerster.

A team of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, lawyers led by the late
Harvey R. Miller, Esq., serve as counsel to Lehman.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and noticing agent.

Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan Fleck, Esq., and Dennis O'Donnell,
Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in New York, served
as counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.
Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital, Inc., served as the
Committee's  investment banker.

On Sept. 19, 2008, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered an
order commencing liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc., pursuant to
the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act (Case No.
08-CIV-8119 (GEL)).  James W. Giddens was appointed as trustee for
the SIPA liquidation of the business of LBI.  He is represented by
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.

The Bankruptcy Court approved Barclays Bank Plc's purchase of
Lehman Brothers' North American investment banking and capital
markets operations and supporting infrastructure for US$1.75
billion.  Nomura Holdings Inc., the largest brokerage house in
Japan, purchased LBHI's operations in Europe for US$2 plus the
retention of most of employees.  Nomura also bought Lehman's
operations in the Asia Pacific for US$225 million.

The Debtors' chapter 11 plan was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court
on December 6, 2011 and became effective on March 6, 2012. The
Debtors have commenced making distributions to holders of allowed
claims and will continue to make distributions in accordance with
the Plan until the liquidation of their assets is complete.

                          *     *     *

James W. Giddens, the trustee for the liquidation of LBI, announced
in April 2021 that having already achieved a 100 percent
distribution of customer property, the Trustee has now distributed
approximately $9.096 billion to LBI's general unsecured creditors
with allowed claims -- representing a distribution of 40.0605
percent -- and approximately $261 million to LBI's allowed secured,
administrative, and priority creditors -- substantially completing
all seventh interim distributions to these claimants.  The LBI
Trustee has distributed more than $115 billion to over 110,000 of
LBI's former customers and creditors.  This includes:  (i) $92.301
billion distributed to LBI's former customers through the account
transfer process; (ii) $13.472 billion distributed through the
customer claim process in full satisfaction of all allowed customer
claims; (iii) $9.096 billion distributed to LBI's general unsecured
creditors with allowed claims -- representing a distribution of
40.0605 percent; and (iv) $261 million distributed to LBIā€™s
allowed secured, administrative, and priority creditors --
representing a 100 percent distribution on these claims.

In October 2021, the team winding down LBHI said it will pay $122.5
million to creditors, the 23rd distribution since Lehman's collapse
in 2008.   This will bring the total payout to unsecured creditors
to $128.9 billion.  Bondholders were projected to receive about 21
cents on the dollar when Lehman's bankruptcy plan went into effect
in early 2012.  The 23rd distribution raised the bondholders'
recovery to more than 46.5 cents on the dollar and recoveries for
general unsecured creditors of Lehman's commodities to 82.5 cents
on the dollar.


LEHMAN BROTHERS: Payouts to Unsecured Creditors Now at $128.9BB
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., as Plan Administrator, announced
Sept. 30, 2021, in a court filing the percentage recovery that will
be distributed on October 7, 2021, to holders of allowed claims
against LBHI, excluding certain creditors that will receive final
distributions as authorized by the Bankruptcy Court on July 1,
2021.

LBHI's aggregate 23rd distribution to unsecured creditors pursuant
to its confirmed chapter 11 plan will total approximately $122.5
million, including $8.4 million in final distributions to certain
creditors.  This distribution consists of (1) $113.5 million of
payments on account of third-party claims, which includes
non-controlled affiliate claims, and (2) $9.0 million of payments
between LBHI and its controlled affiliates.  

Cumulatively through the 23rd distribution, LBHI and its debtor
affiliates' total distributions to unsecured creditors will amount
to approximately $128.9 billion, including (1) $95.9 billion of
payments on account of third-party claims, which includes
non-controlled affiliate claims, and (2) $33.0 billion of payments
among the Lehman Debtors and their controlled affiliates.

In accordance with the Chapter 11 plan, which was confirmed on
December 6, 2011, and subject to available funds, LBHI's 24th
distribution to creditors is anticipated to be made within 5
business days of March 30, 2022.

The cumulative distribution to LBHI unsecured claims as a result of
the 23rd distribution is as follows:

   * LBHI Class 3 Senior Unsecured Claims: 46.472993%
   * LBHI Class 7 General Unsecured Claims: 43.506061%

A copy of the notice of the 23rd distribution is available at Epiq
at https://bit.ly/3iyVp6U

                      About Lehman Brothers

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. -- http://www.lehman.com/-- was the
fourth largest investment bank in the United States. For more than
150 years, Lehman Brothers has been a leader in the global
financial markets by serving the financial needs of corporations,
governmental units, institutional clients and individuals
worldwide.

Lehman Brothers Holdings filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 08-13555) on Sept. 15, 2008.  Lehman's bankruptcy
petition disclosed US$639 billion in assets and US$613 billion in
debts, effectively making the firm's bankruptcy filing the largest
in U.S. history.  Several other affiliates followed thereafter.

Affiliates Merit LLC, LB Somerset LLC and LB Preferred Somerset LLC
sought for bankruptcy protection in December 2009.

The Debtors' bankruptcy cases were assigned to Judge James M. Peck.
Judge Shelley Chapman took over the case after Judge Peck retired
from the bench to join Morrison & Foerster.

A team of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, lawyers led by the late
Harvey R. Miller, Esq., serve as counsel to Lehman.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions serves as claims and noticing agent.

Dennis F. Dunne, Esq., Evan Fleck, Esq., and Dennis O'Donnell,
Esq., at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, in New York, served
as counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.
Houlihan Lokey Howard & Zukin Capital, Inc., served as the
Committee's  investment banker.

On Sept. 19, 2008, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch of the U.S.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered an
order commencing liquidation of Lehman Brothers, Inc., pursuant to
the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act (Case No.
08-CIV-8119 (GEL)).  James W. Giddens was appointed as trustee for
the SIPA liquidation of the business of LBI.  He is represented by
Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP.

The Bankruptcy Court approved Barclays Bank Plc's purchase of
Lehman Brothers' North American investment banking and capital
markets operations and supporting infrastructure for US$1.75
billion.  Nomura Holdings Inc., the largest brokerage house in
Japan, purchased LBHI's operations in Europe for US$2 plus the
retention of most of employees.  Nomura also bought Lehman's
operations in the Asia Pacific for US$225 million.

The Debtors' chapter 11 plan was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court
on December 6, 2011 and became effective on March 6, 2012. The
Debtors have commenced making distributions to holders of allowed
claims and will continue to make distributions in accordance with
the Plan until the liquidation of their assets is complete.

                          *     *     *

James W. Giddens, the trustee for the liquidation of LBI, announced
in April 2021 that having already achieved a 100 percent
distribution of customer property, the Trustee has now distributed
approximately $9.096 billion to LBI's general unsecured creditors
with allowed claims -- representing a distribution of 40.0605
percentā€”and approximately $261 million to LBI's allowed secured,
administrative, and priority creditors -- substantially completing
all seventh interim distributions to these claimants.  The LBI
Trustee has distributed more than $115 billion to over 110,000 of
LBI's former customers and creditors.  This includes:  (i) $92.301
billion distributed to LBIā€™s former customers through the account
transfer process; (ii) $13.472 billion distributed through the
customer claim process in full satisfaction of all allowed customer
claims; (iii) $9.096 billion distributed to LBI's general unsecured
creditors with allowed claims -- representing a distribution of
40.0605 percent; and (iv) $261 million distributed to LBIā€™s
allowed secured, administrative, and priority creditors --
representing a 100 percent distribution on these claims.

In October 2021, the team winding down LBHI said it will pay $122.5
million to creditors, the 23rd distribution since Lehman's collapse
in 2008.   This will bring the total payout to unsecured creditors
to $128.9 billion.  Bondholders were projected to receive about 21
cents on the dollar when Lehman's bankruptcy plan went into effect
in early 2012.  The 23rd distribution raised the bondholders'
recovery to more than 46.5 cents on the dollar.


LUX AMBER: Incurs $1.98M Net Loss in Fiscal Year Ended April 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lux Amber, Corp. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Annual Report on Form 10-K disclosing a net loss of $1.98
million on $998,947 of revenue for the year ended April 30, 2021,
compared to a net loss of $3.59 million on $976,671 of revenue for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.

As of April 30, 2021, the Company had $3.35 million in total
assets, $2.47 million in total liabilities, and $884,913 in ttoal
equity.

During the year ended April 30, 2021, the primary sources of
liquidity were cash flows from financing activities, and in
particular, proceeds from issuance of convertible notes payable and
the receipt of PPP loans.

Plano, Texas-based Whitley Penn LLP, the Company's auditor since
2020, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Sept. 29, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1740695/000168316821004611/luxamber_10k-043021.htm

                      About Lux Amber, Corp.

Headquartered in Frisco, TX, Lux Amber, Corp., formed on Jan. 19,
2018, is an international specialty chemical company.  LAC has
three wholly owned subsidiaries: Worldwide Specialty Chemicals,
Inc., Industrial Chem Solutions, Inc., and Safeway Pest
Elimination, LLC.


MADDOX FOUNDRY: Nov. 10 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
--------------------------------------------------------
On April 5, 2021, debtor Maddox Foundry & Machine Works, LLC filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida
a Disclosure Statement and Plan. On September 30, 2021, Judge Karen
K. Specie ordered that:

     * Nov. 10, 2021, at 10:45 a.m., via CourtCall is the hearing
to consider the approval of the disclosure statement.

     * Nov. 3, 2021, is fixed as the last day for filing and
serving written objections to the disclosure statement.

A copy of the order dated September 30, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3FrjVku from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

             About Maddox Foundry & Machine Works

Maddox Foundry & Machine Works, LLC, is a company that operates a
foundry machine shop.  It emerged from a prior bankruptcy in 2017.

In February of 2019, Chase Hope took over control of the Debtor
from his parents, Fletcher and Mary Hope through the Debtor's
parent company, Green Health Science, LLC.  By April 2019, the
Debtor started to experience financial issues.  The Debtor
experienced cash-flow issues and was unable to service its
seven-figure obligations to the McGurn Entities.

Maddox Foundry & Machine Works, LLC, a company that operates a
foundry machine shop, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 20-10211) on Oct. 7,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
$500,000 and liabilities of $4.495 million.

Judge Karen K. Specie oversees the case.  

Seldon J. Childers, Esq., at ChildersLaw, LLC, serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel and Dawn Moesser, ASA, of ICS Asset
Management Services, Inc., as the Debtor's appraiser.


MAINSTREET PIER: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru Nov 20
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado authorized
Mainstreet Pier, LLC to use cash collateral on a final basis in
accordance with the budget, with a 5% variance.

The Debtor has an immediate need to use Cash Collateral in order to
permit, among other things:

     -- the orderly continuation of the operation of its
businesses,

     -- maintain business relationships with vendors, suppliers and
customers,

     -- make payroll, and

     -- satisfy other working capital needs.

As adequate protection for the Debtor's use of cash collateral,
Independent Bank, FirstBank, and any other party asserting an
interest in the Debtor's cash, cash equivalents, accounts, and
accounts receivable, are granted a post-petition lien on all of the
Debtor's postpetition assets. All replacement liens will hold the
same relative priority to assets as did the pre-petition liens.

As additional adequate protection, the Debtor will pay Independent
Bank the sum of $2,000 on or before October 30 and on the 30th day
of each month thereafter.

To the extent of the Cash Collateral Use Amount that is not offset
by the value of the Replacement Lien in Adequate Protection
Collateral, the Secured Lender is granted an allowed super-priority
administrative claim pursuant to Section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code to the extent and priority provided for in the Bankruptcy Code
and by operation of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Secured Lender's consent to the use of Cash Collateral and the
Debtor's authority to use Cash Collateral under the Order will
terminate upon the earlier of (i) the occurrence of any Event of
Default, or (ii) November 20, 2021.

The Debtor will be deemed in default under the Order upon the
occurrence of: (i) any future Event of Default under the Secured
Loan Documents other than an Event of Default under the Secured
Loan Documents which conflicts with the terms of the Order or (ii)
any of the following conditions unless such Event(s) of Default is
specifically waived in writing by Secured Lender: (a) the Debtor's
failure to perform in any material respect any of its obligations
pursuant to the Order; (b) Debtor's failure to comply with the
Budget; (c) the appointment of a trustee pursuant to either
sections 1104(a)( 1) or, 1104(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code; (d) the
appointment of an examiner with expanded powers; (e) the conversion
or dismissal of the case; (f) the entry of an order providing for
relief from the automatic stay on any item valued at $25,000 or
more; (g) the entry of any order amending, modifying, violating,
contradicting, reversing, revoking, staying, rescinding or vacating
this Order without the express prior written consent of Secured
Lender (which may be withheld in Secured Lender's sole discretion
and shall not be implied from any other action, inaction or
acquiescence by Secured Lender); (h) conversion of the Debtor's
chapter 11  case to a case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget is available at
https://bit.ly/3D7F554  from PacerMonitor.com.

The budget provided for these total expenses, on a weekly basis:

   $74,283 for the week ending October 9, 2021;
   $75,114 for the week ending October 16, 2021;
   $74,283 for the week ending October 23, 2021;
   $80,283 for the week ending October 30, 2021;
   $70,316for the week ending November 6, 2021;
   $70,316 for the week ending November 13, 2021; and
   $70,316 for the week ending November 20, 2021

                    About Mainstreet Pier, LLC

Mainstreet Pier, LLC is a Colorado limited liability company which
owns and operates a boutique hotel, commonly known at The Ascent on
Main Street. The Ascent has 51 hotel rooms, operates two
restaurants and an event center, and leases out another two
restaurants and a jewelry store.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 21-14682) on September
10, 2021. In the petition signed by Rick Hill, manager, the Debtor
disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $50 million in
liabilities.

Judge Elizabeth E. Brown oversees the case.

Jonathan M. Dickey, Esq., at Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, P.C. is
the Debtor's counsel.

Independent Bank, as Secured Lender, is represented by:

     John F. Young, Esq.
     Matthew T. Faga, Esq.
     Markus Williams Young & Hunsicker LLC
     1775 Sherman Street, Suite 1950
     Denver, CO 80203
     Tel: (303) 830-0800
     Fax: (303) 830-0809
     E-mail: jvoungfrJmarkuswilliams.com
     E-mail: mfagafajmarkuswilliams.com



MALLINCKRODT PLC: Lawyer Says Bondholders Concerned and Frustrated
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Hill, writing for Bloomberg News, reports that the
bondholders of Mallinckrdot PLC are 'frustrated and concerned,'
lawyer says.

A group of Mallinckrodt Plc bondholders has grown "frustrated and
concerned" with the drugmaker's ongoing bankruptcy, Alice Eaton of
law firm Paul Weiss said on behalf of the holders in a hearing
Monday, October 4, 2021.

The reorganization is not moving fast enough, Eaton said, and the
company is "suffering sluggishness by being under the microscope of
bankruptcy."

The noteholder group, which as of July 2021 counted Aurelius
Capital Management and Oaktree Capital Management among its
members, have been supportive of Mallinckrodtā€™s reorganization
since it began almost a year ago.

The bondholders are "paying for those costs in the form of
diminished recoveries," Eaton said.

                      About Mallinckrodt PLC

Mallinckrodt is a global business consisting of multiple
wholly-owned subsidiaries that develop, manufacture, market and
distribute specialty pharmaceutical products and therapies. The
company's Specialty Brands reportable segment's areas of focus
include autoimmune and rare diseases in specialty areas like
neurology, rheumatology, nephrology, pulmonology and ophthalmology;
immunotherapy and neonatal respiratory critical care therapies;
analgesics; and gastrointestinal products.  Its Specialty Generics
reportable segment includes specialty generic drugs and active
pharmaceutical ingredients.  Visit http://www.mallinckrodt.com/   


On Oct. 12, 2020, Mallinckrodt plc and certain of its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection in Delaware in the U.S. (Bankr. D.
Del. Lead Case No. 20-12522) to seek approval of a restructuring
that would reduce total debt by $1.3 billion and resolve
opioid-related claims against them.

Mallinckrodt plc disclosed $9,584,626,122 in assets and
$8,647,811,427 in liabilities as of Sept. 25, 2020.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Latham & Watkins LLP and Richards, Layton &
Finger P.A. as their bankruptcy counsel; Arthur Cox and Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz as corporate and finance counsel; Ropes & Gray
LLP as litigation counsel; Torys LLP as CCAA counsel; Guggenheim
Securities LLC as investment banker; and AlixPartners LLP as
restructuring advisor. Prime Clerk, LLC, is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Cooley LLP
as its legal counsel, Robinson & Cole LLP as co-counsel, and Dundon
Advisers LLC as its financial advisor.

On Oct. 27, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an
official committee of opioid related claimants.  The OCC tapped
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as its lead counsel, Cole Schotz
as Delaware co-counsel, Province Inc. as financial advisor, and
Jefferies LLC as investment banker.

The Debtors filed their plan of reorganization and disclosure
statement on April 20, 2021.


MARKEL CATCO: Chapter 15 Case Summary
-------------------------------------
Four affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                         Case No.
     ------                                         --------
     Markel CATCo Reinsurance Fund Ltd.             21-11733
     Crawford House, 50 Cedar Avenue
     Hamilton, HM 11
     Bermuda

     CATCo Reinsurance Opportunities Fund Ltd.      21-11734
     Markel CATCo Investment Management Ltd.        21-11735
     Markel CATCo Re Ltd.                           21-11736

Business Description:     Markel CATCo creates and manages a
                          series of innovative insurance-linked
                          investment funds which provide its
                          investors the opportunity to participate
                          in a selected mix of catastrophe
                          reinsurance risks accessed through its
                          reinsurance company, Markel CATCo Re
                          Ltd.

Foreign Proceeding:       Liquidation Proceedings under Part XIII
                          of the Companies Act 1981 (as amended),  
          
                          currently pending before the Supreme
                          Court of Bermuda

Chapter 15 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court:                    United States Bankruptcy Court
                          Southern District of New York

Judge:                    Hon. Lisa G. Beckerman

Foreign Representatives:  Simon Appell and John C. McKenna
                          26 Bermudiana Road, Suite 502
                          P.O. Box HM 321
                          Hamilton, HM 11
                          Bermuda

Foreign
Representatives'
Counsel:                  Lisa Laukitis, Esq.  
                          SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

                          One Manhattan West
                          New York, New York 10001  
                          Tel: (212) 735-3000
                          Fax: (212) 735-2000
                          Email: lisa.laukitis@skadden.com

                            - and ā€“
  
                          Justin M. Winerman, Esq.  
                          Anthony R. Joseph, Esq.
                          155 North Wacker Drive
                          Chicago, Illinois 60606-1720
                          Tel: (312) 407-0700
                          Fax: (312) 407-0411
                          Email: justin.winerman@skadden.com

                            - and -

                          Peter Newman, Esq.
                          SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER
                          & FLOM (UK) LLP
                          40 Bank Street
                          Canary Wharf
                          London E14 5DS
                          Tel: +44 20 7519 7000
                          Fax: +44 20 7519 7070
                          Email: peter.newman@skadden.com

Estimated Assets:         Unknown

Estimated Debt:           Unknown

A full-text copy of Markel CATCo Reinsurance Fund Ltd.'s Chapter 15
petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/IO7GPKY/Markel_CATCo_Reinsurance_Fund__nysbke-21-11733__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


MARRIOTT HOUSTON WESTCHASE: Value of Collateral Continues to Drop
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Julianne Cavaliere, writing for Trepp, reports that the value of
the collateral for the $69.9 million Marriott Houston Westchase
loan was lowered for the third time based on September remittance
data.

The subject collateral is a 600-room full-service hotel located at
2900 Bri-arpark Drive in Houston, TX.

According to Trepp, the collateral was valued at $135 million in
2007, but that value was reduced to $72 million in January 2018 and
to $47.5 million in 2020. In September 2021, servicer data showed a
new value of $39.8 million.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 19, Fitch
Ratings has downgraded one and affirmed 14 distressed classes of
Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-PWR18
commercial mortgage passthrough certifi-cates (BSCMSI 2007-PWR18).

   DEBT             RATING            PRIOR
   ----             ------            -----
Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-PWR18

B 07401DAL5    LT  CCCsf  Downgrade    Bsf
C 07401DAM3    LT  Csf    Affirmed     Csf
D 07401DAN1    LT  Csf    Affirmed     Csf
E 07401DAP6    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
F 07401DAQ4    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
G 07401DAR2    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
H 07401DAS0    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
J 07401DAT8    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
K 07401DAU5    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
L 07401DAV3    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
M 07401DAW1    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
N 07401DAX9    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
O 07401DAY7    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
P 07401DAZ4    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf
Q 07401DBA8    LT  Dsf    Affirmed     Dsf

The downgrade reflects losses to class B are considered possible.
Loss expec-tations on the remaining loan, the specially serviced
Marriott Houston Westchase, have increased due to continued
property performance declines, growing loan exposure and limited
progress on workout. Fitch's loss expecta-tion of 67% considers a
discount to the recent appraisal and reflects a stressed value of
approximately $46,000 per key.

The loan is secured by a 604-key, Marriott-flagged, full service
hotel located in Houston, TX, approximately 10 miles west of the
CBD. The coronavirus pan-demic has exacerbated already existing
pre-pandemic property performance dete-rioration caused by the
weakening economic conditions in Houston, reliance on the
energy/oil sector and new hotel supply in the market. The hotel
reported a negative NOI at YE 2020, and the servicer-reported NOI
debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) has remained below 1.0x since
2018.

The loan transferred to special servicing for a second time in
March 2019 due to the borrower's request for a second modification,
which closed in December 2019, with terms that included a maturity
extension through June 2023 and the establishment of a new property
improvement plan reserve. The loan had per-formed in accordance
with terms of the modification until the borrower re-defaulted
again in May 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The loan was reported in foreclosure as of the September 2021
remittance. The borrower has not made a viable workout proposal or
contributed additional eq-uity. The special servicer is monitoring
property-level payables and evaluat-ing the exercise of remedies.

The loan had first transferred to special servicing in July 2017
for imminent maturity default, ahead of its November 2017 maturity,
and briefly transferred back to the master servicer in December
2018. In June 2018, the property was sold and the loan was assumed
by a new borrower, which paid down the outstand-ing loan balance by
2.5% and repaid past-due franchising fees and trade paya-bles. The
first modification converted debt service payments to interest-only
and extended the loan maturity through June 2021. The new borrower
was also required to pay down the loan by an additional 2.5% by
Dec. 31, 2019, but the payment was not made.

The property remains open for business as of September 2021. As of
the TTM June 2021 STR report, the hotel reported an occupancy, ADR
and RevPAR of 22.6%, $89.92, and $20.29, respectively, compared
with 23.8%, $108.26, and $25.72 as of YE 2020 and 69.7%, $118.66,
and $82.71 as of TTM August 2019. The hotel's TTM June 2021
penetration ratios for occupancy, ADR, and RevPAR were 56%, 119.5%,
and 66.9%, respectively.

The property's franchise agreement with Marriott expires in
December 2023, with one 10-year renewal option. The hotel underwent
a $21 million renovation in 2016 that was completed in January 2017
and included the addition of a Mar-riott Rewards Club Lounge, four
new guest rooms, new bedding and furnishings, guest room
refrigerators, and modernized elevators. The borrower also spent
more than $2 million between June 2018 and June 2020 to renovate
and upgrade rooms, common areas, mechanics, and amenities.

The transaction has not received any principal paydown since the
July 2018 re-mittance. As of the September 2021 distribution date,
the pool's aggregate principal balance has been reduced by 97.2% to
$69.9 million from $2.5 billion at issuance. Realized losses to
date totaled 8.5% of the original pool bal-ance. Interest
shortfalls totaling $13.5 million are currently affecting clas-ses
B through S.


MARTIN FINANCIAL: Seeks to Hire Kelley & Clements as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Financial, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Georgia to employ Kelley & Clements, LLP
to serve as legal counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's services include:

     a. providing substantive and strategic advice on how to
accomplish the Debtor's goals in connection with the prosecution of
its bankruptcy case;

     b. advising the Debtor of its obligations, duties and rights
under the Bankruptcy Code;

     c. preparing legal documents, including the Debtor's Chapter
11 plan and disclosure statement;

     d. appearing in court and at any meeting with the U.S. trustee
and creditors;

     e. performing various services to administer the case,
including, without limitation, (i) preparing motions,
certifications of counsel, notices of fee applications, motions and
hearings, and hearing binders of documents and pleadings, (ii)
monitoring the docket for filings, (iii) monitoring pending
applications, motions, hearing dates, and other matters and the
deadlines associated therewith, (iv) handling inquiries regarding
pending matters and the general status of the case; and (v)
providing notice to parties in interest in compliance with the
court's direction;

     f. interacting and communicating with the court's chambers and
clerk's office; and

     g. performing all other necessary services.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Charles N. Kelley, Jr., Partner  $415 per hour
     Jonathan D. Clements, Partner    $250 per hour
     Tammy A. Winkler, Paralegal      $135 per hour

As disclosed in court filings, Kelley & Clements is a
"disinterested person" as that phrase is defined in Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Charles N. Kelley, Jr., Esq.
     Kelley & Clements LLP
     PO Box 2758
     Gainesville, GA 30503
     Phone: (770) 531-0007
     Email: ckelley@kelleyclements.com

                    About Martin Financial LLC

Martin Financial, LLC filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 21-30495) on Oct. 1, 2021, listing up to
$50,000 in assets and up to $100,000 in liabilities. Charles N.
Kelley, Jr., Esq., at Kelley & Clements, LLP represents the Debtor
as legal counsel.


MATADOR RESOURCES: Fitch Gives FirstTime 'B+' IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned first-time Long-Term Issuer Default
Ratings (IDRs) of 'B+' with Stable Rating Outlooks to Matador
Resources Company (MTDR) and MRC Energy Company. Fitch has also
assigned issue-level ratings of 'BB+'/'RR1' to MRC's senior secured
reserve-based lending (RBL) credit facility and a 'BB-'/'RR3'
rating to MTDR's senior unsecured notes.

Matador's ratings reflect its high margin, oil-weighted Delaware
acreage, supportive midstream assets at San Mateo that reduce
transportation and marketing costs, improving unit economics via
drilling efficiencies and strong netbacks. Fitch expects
management's four-rig drilling program to generate meaningful FCF
in the near term, which supports further repayment of the RBL and
deleveraging toward 1.5x in 2022. These factors are partially
offset by uncertainty around long-term economic inventory life
extension, maintenance of currently strong unit economics outside
of the company's 'A+' locations, its more prospective acreage
position in the northern part of the Delaware basin and exposure to
federal lands.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Delaware-Focused Asset Base: Matador's asset profile consists of
approximately 121,000 net acres in the Delaware basin split between
Eddy and Lea counties in New Mexico and Loving County, Texas in
addition to smaller non-core acreage positions in the Eagle Ford
(25,700 net acres) and Haynesville (17,700 net acres). The
company's Delaware acreage has relatively high oil exposure
(approximately 57% as of 2Q21), is largely held by production (HBP)
and supports two-mile laterals across a majority of drilling
locations. Approximately 29% of the acreage is on federal lands;
however, approximately 75% of this acreage is HBP, and almost all
of the remaining acreage is not subject to expiration before 2028.
The asset profile supports Matador's FCF-focused strategy in the
medium term, but its northern acreage in Twin Lakes and Ranger
remains more prospective and requires further de-risking.

Supportive Midstream Assets: Matador's midstream joint venture
assets at San Mateo provide both operational benefits through
overall reduced transportation costs and lower marketing fees in
addition to performance incentives from partner Five Point Energy
LLC. The San Mateo assets offer 460 MMcf/d of gas processing
capacity, 335 Mbbl/d of water disposal capacity and oil gathering
and transportation systems which covers much of Matador's Delaware
acreage. Matador has received approximately $76 million in
performance incentives to date ($31.9 million in 1H21) from Five
Point and continues to meet threshold requirements to earn up to an
additional $150 million of incentives through 2024, which supports
the FCF and liquidity profiles.

Four-Rig Drilling Program: Fitch believes Matador's four-rig
drilling program will generate modest production growth momentum
and positive FCF through the rating horizon. Total production
averaged 93.2 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (mboepd)
in 2Q21 following increased drilling activity and 13 Voni wells
turned to sales on the company's Stateline acreage. Management has
primarily targeted Wolfcamp A and the lower Bone Spring intervals
with 160-acre spacing and continues to see strong results. Fitch
expects continued operational momentum as an additional 26 wells
will turn to sales in Stateline and the Greater Stebbins Area in
2H21 and believes management will drill several more wells in the
Rodney Robinson part of its Antelope Ridge acreage starting in
3Q21.

Drilling Efficiency and Cost Improvements: Matador expects nearly
all of its operated wells turned to sales will be two miles or
longer, which, combined with management's use of multi-well pads,
is driving significant improvements in drilling and completion
(D&C) capex per foot. Matador's D&C capex/ft averaged approximately
$615 in 2Q21 and has significantly improved since 2020 when it
averaged $850/foot with an average lateral length of 8,800 feet.
Management has indicated that drilling and completion costs are
likely to increase in 2H21 given higher diesel, steel and proppant
prices, but costs still remain competitive at about $695/ft in
2021E based on guidance from management.

Positive FCF; Debt Repayment Focus: Fitch forecasts meaningful FCF
in the near term at Fitch's price deck with expected capital
spending of approximately $600 million in 2021 as Matador
reestablishes operational momentum, which will then decline to $550
million in 2022 as growth capex moderates. Management remains
focused on reducing debt and has repaid approximately $200 million
on its RBL credit facility since the start of the year. Fitch
believes management will continue to allocate a majority of FCF
toward reducing the outstanding RBL balance ($240 million
outstanding as of 2Q21) and that borrowings will be meaningfully
reduced by early 2022. Fitch-calculated gross debt/EBITDA is
forecast to approach 1.5x in 2022 with growth-linked improvements
thereafter.

Proactive Hedging Strategy: Fitch believes Matador will remain
opportunistic and maintain adequate hedge coverage throughout the
rating horizon consistent with historical averages. Matador is
currently hedging approximately 65% of its oil and gas production
for the remainder of 2021 primarily through collars that provide
price upside. Oil hedge coverage in 2022 does drop to approximately
10%, but Fitch believes management may improve coverage to
approximately 30% by the start of the year with potential for
further increases thereafter.

Long-Term Inventory Uncertainty: Fitch believes Matador has
sufficient acreage to maintain operational momentum in the medium
term, but there is uncertainty around maintenance of unit economics
outside of the company's approximately 10 years of 'A+' locations.
Management defines its 'A+' locations as those with an average
well-level IRR of at least 15% at $30-$40/bbl oil and $2.00/mcf gas
prices. Fitch believes well results outside of these locations and
its proven Wolfcamp A and lower Bone Spring intervals could vary,
and the company may need to redirect or deploy additional capital
to further de-risk more prospective intervals or execute M&A to
extend economic inventory life over the long term. However, at
current commodity prices the number of economic locations expands
considerably.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Matador's 2Q21 production averaged 93.2 mboepd (57% oil), which is
slightly larger than CrownRock L.P (B+/Positive; 82.3 mboepd in
2020) but smaller than SM Energy Company (B/Stable; 136.5 mboepd,
54% oil) and higher-rated Midland operators Endeavor Energy
Resources (BB+/Positive; approximately 170 mboepd in 2020) and
Diamondback Energy, Inc. (BBB/Stable; 401.4 mboepd, 60% liquids).

The company's continued cost reduction efforts and high oil mix
have led to strong Fitch-calculated unhedged netbacks of $35.2/boe
in 2Q21. This compares favorably to SM Energy ($29.9/boe),
primarily driven by SM's higher natural gas cut, is slightly higher
than Diamondback ($34.5/boe) but similar to CrownRock and Endeavor.
Fitch expects Matador to generate meaningful FCF through 2022. This
should support debt repayment and leverage metrics approaching 1.5x
by 2022, which is generally consistent with leverage profiles
across the Permian peer group.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- WTI oil price of $60/bbl in 2021, $52/bbl in 2022 and $50/bbl
    thereafter;

-- Henry Hub natural gas price of $3.40/mcf in 2021, $2.75/mcf in
    2022 and $2.45/mcf thereafter;

-- Single-digit production growth in 2021 followed by mid-teen
    growth in 2022;

-- Capex of approximately $600 million in 2021 and $550 million
    in 2022 followed by production-linked spending thereafter;

-- Prioritization of forecast FCF toward RBL repayment;

-- No material M&A activity.

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

The recovery analysis assumes Matador would be reorganized as a
going-concern in bankruptcy rather than liquidated. Fitch has
assumed a 10% administrative claim and a 100% draw on its secured
revolving facility.

Going-Concern (GC) Approach

Matador's going-concern EBITDA assumption reflects Fitch's
projections under a stressed case price deck, which assumes WTI oil
prices of $32/bbl in 2022, $42/bbl in 2023, and $45/bbl in the long
term.

The GC EBITDA estimate reflects Fitch's view of a sustainable,
post-reorganization EBITDA level upon which it bases the enterprise
valuation, which reflects the decline from current pricing levels
to stressed levels, and then a partial recovery coming out of a
troughed pricing environment.

An EV multiple of 3.5x EBITDA is applied to the GC EBITDA to
calculate a post-reorganization enterprise value. The choice of
this multiple considers the following factors:

-- Uncertainty around the medium and long-term sustainability of
    economic inventory and unit economics given the
    differentiation among Matador's acreage position within the
    Delaware basin. Fitch believes the company's northern acreage
    in the Twin Lakes and Ranger plays remain more prospective
    than the acreage the company is currently drilling and will
    potentially require further de-risking.

-- The potential for heightened event risk around the company's
    federal acreage which represents approximately 29% of total
    acreage.

-- The historical bankruptcy case study exit multiples for peer
    companies ranged from 2.8x to 7.0x, with an average E&P median
    of 4.4x.

Liquidation Approach

The liquidation estimate reflects Fitch's view of the value of
balance sheet assets that can be realized in sale or liquidation
processes conducted during a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding
and distributed to creditors.

Fitch considers valuations such as SEC PV-10 and recent M&A
transaction valuations for each basin including multiples for
production per flowing barrel, proved reserves valuation, value per
acre, and value per drilling location.

The RBL is assumed to be fully drawn upon default, given the
company's borrowing base at $900 million as well as Fitch's
expectation that near-term production growth would likely offset
some of the risk of price-linked borrowing base reduction. The RBL
is senior to the unsecured notes in the waterfall.

The allocation of value in the liability waterfall and its priority
position results in recovery corresponding to 'RR1' for the senior
secured RBL credit facility and 'RR3' for the senior unsecured
notes.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Expansion of economic inventory life and further de-risking of
    longer-term unit economics;

-- Production growth resulting in average daily production above
    125 Mboepd;

-- Allocation of FCF toward repayment of the RBL;

-- Mid-cycle Debt/EBITDA sustained below 2.0x.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Loss of operational momentum resulting in average production
    sustained below 85 Mboepd;

-- Inability to extend economic inventory life that leads to
    expectations for weakened unit economics;

-- Inability to reduce RBL borrowings that materially erodes the
    liquidity profile and increases refinance risk;

-- Mid-cycle Debt/EBITDA sustained above 2.5x.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Improving Liquidity Profile: As of 2Q21, Matador had $45 million
cash on hand and $414 million of borrowing capacity under its $700
million RBL ($900 million borrowing base) including $46 million of
letters of credit outstanding. The company has repaid approximately
$200 million of RBL borrowings since the start of the year and
expects further reduction in 2H21. The RBL is subject to a
semi-annual borrowing base redetermination and was affirmed at $900
million in April.

Clear Maturity Schedule: Matador's maturity schedule remains
relatively clear with the RBL and senior notes maturing in 2023 and
2026, respectively. Fitch believes further RBL repayment will
reduce refinance risk and should allow for an extension of the
facility.

ISSUER PROFILE

Matador Resources Company is an independent exploration and
production company primarily focused in the Delaware Basin in
Southwest New Mexico and West Texas. The company also has non-core
operations in the Eagle Ford shale play in South Texas, the
Haynesville/Cotton Valley in Louisiana and conducts Midstream
operations through a midstream joint venture, San Mateo, in support
of E&P transportation and water gathering services.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


MCAFEE LLC: Fitch Hikes Rating on Secured Credit Facility to 'BB+'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded McAfee, LLC's senior secured credit
facility to 'BB+'/'RR1' from 'BB'/'RR2'.

The upgrade resulted from Fitch's application of its updated
"Corporates Recovery Ratings and Instrument Ratings Criteria." The
ratings have been removed from Under Criteria Observation (UCO),
where they were placed following the publication of the updated
Recovery Rating criteria on April 9, 2021.

McAfee completed the divestiture of its enterprise cyber security
segment to a Consortium led by Symphony Technology Group and became
a pure play consumer cybersecurity company on July 27, 2021.
Proceeds from the $4 billion all cash deal will be used to cover
transaction fees, pay a special dividend, and pay down $1.0 billion
in term loan debt. Fitch believes the loss of scale and revenue
diversity from the sale of the Enterprise segment are offset by the
deleveraging nature of the transaction and by higher margins and
growth rates in the Consumer segment.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Recovery Ratings Criteria Update: Instrument ratings and Recovery
Ratings (RRs) for McAfee's senior secured ratings are based on
Fitch's newly introduced notching grid for issuers with 'BB'
category Long-Term IDRs. This grid reflects the outstanding
recovery characteristics for similarly ranked instruments. Fitch
views McAfee's senior secured revolver and term loans as Category 1
first lien debt, which translates into a two-notch uplift from the
IDR of 'BB-' with a Recovery Rating of 'RR1'.

Moderate Leverage Profile: Although the sale of the Enterprise
segment resulted in the loss of roughly half of revenue and a third
of EBITDA, debt prepayments of $1 billion resulted in the
transaction being slightly deleveraging. Pro forma for the debt
prepayments and using June 30, 2021 earnings, Fitch calculates
leverage at 3.49x. Fitch is projecting leverage to trend further
downward to 2.9x over the rating horizon, consistent with other
'BB' companies.

Narrower Product Focus: Fitch expects the loss of the Enterprise
segment to result in a leaner, more focused and higher margin
company. Following the divestiture McAfee will lose about half of
its revenue base along with a third of EBITDA, but the remaining
company will have increased EBITDA margins in the high 40% to low
50% range as well as a higher growth rate. In recent years high
growth and margins at the Consumer segment have been held back by
underperformance in the Enterprise segment. Although scale and
revenue diversity will decrease substantially following transaction
Fitch believes this is offset by the stronger operating profile of
the new company, which will be better able to focus on its core
growth areas.

IT Security Threats Increasingly Complex: IT security threats have
evolved from PC-centric to mobile devices, networks, and user
identities. The evolving threats enable a continuous stream of
niche solutions to develop, addressing threats beyond the
traditional PC-centric security to protect users, data and networks
at various levels of the internet. While some of these solutions
were developed by legacy cybersecurity providers, many were created
by suppliers with narrow expertise. McAfee recently has placed an
increased emphasis on providing security to mobile devices in order
to align its product offerings to modern computing habits.

Reliance on Channel Partners: McAfee relies on channel partnerships
as a key part of their go-to-market strategy, notably signing a
five-year global agreement to provide consumer security on ASUS PC
product as well as renewing a deal to sell security products on
Costco. The loss of, or failure to sign new channel partners, could
result in growth headwinds for McAfee.

Fragmented Industry: The cyber security market is highly fragmented
with a high number of smaller providers continuing to remain
relevant by providing niche solutions to emerging threats. McAfee
benefits from a positive brand reputation as well as key channel
partnerships to maintain share in fragmented market. Additionally,
Fitch believes that the high number of smaller providers offers a
wealth of acquisition targets for a competitor of McAfee's size.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

McAfee's 'BB-' rating is supported by consistently positive FCF,
adequate liquidity and pro forma gross leverage of 3.49x. Fitch
expects the company to maintain EBITDA margins in the high-40%
range following the divestiture of the Enterprise segment. Fitch
believes the remaining company will have a similar operational
profile to pure play consumer cybersecurity peer NortonLifeLock,
Inc. (BB+/Stable) following the divestiture although the leverage
profile is expected to remain elevated over the rating horizon.
Although McAfee is expected to significantly increase margins and
revenue growth following the transaction, potential execution
risks, decreased scale, and decreased revenue diversity are
offsetting factors.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Transaction results in double digit revenue declines in 2021
    and 2022 as the company experiences a half year and full year
    without Enterprise segment revenues, respectively;

-- EBITDA margins increase to high-40% range following the
    divestiture;

-- FCF margins increase to low-30% range following the
    divestiture;

-- $1 billion in debt prepayments in 2021;

-- $2.5 billion special dividend in 2021 along with $500 million
    in transaction expenses in 2021;

-- No substantial acquisitions over the rating horizon.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Fitch's expectation of Gross Leverage as estimated by Total
    debt with Equity Credit/Operating EBITDA below 3.5x;

-- Fitch's expectation of sustained market share growth resulting
    in material accretive ARPC gains.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Fitch's expectation of Gross Leverage as estimated by Total
    Debt with Equity Credit/Operating EBITDA above 4.5x;

-- Fitch's expectation of sustained market share loss resulting
    in ARPC erosion.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Current liquidity at McAfee consists of $660 million in revolver
availability as well as $416 million in available cash.

As of June 26, 2021, debt at the company consists of a $164 million
revolver due 2022 with no current borrowings, a $500 million
revolver maturing 2024 with no current borrowings, a $3,179 million
first-lien term loan due September 2024, with $2,690 million
outstanding, a EUR 1,073 term loan due September 2024 with $1,269
equivalent in Euros outstanding using June 26, 2021 exchange
rates.

The company's USD denominated first lien debt accrues interest at L
+ 375 and the company's first lien EUR debt accrues interest at E +
350. The first lien term loans amortize at a rate of 1% of
principal annually, payable quarterly. McAfee is in the process of
applying proceeds from the sale of its Enterprise segment to $1
billion in debt prepayments.

ISSUER PROFILE

McAfee is a provider of cybersecurity software that derives revenue
from the sale of security products, subscriptions, software as a
service, support and maintenance, professional services, primarily
through indirect relationships with original equipment
manufacturers or direct sales to customers. The company remains one
of the world's largest pure-play cyber-security providers.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


MCCLATCHY CO: Borello Test Should Be Used in Carriers' Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
An appeal arose from a class action brought by and on behalf of
newspaper home delivery carriers for The Fresno Bee newspaper.  In
the trial court, the matter proceeded to a bifurcated bench trial
on the issue of whether the owner of The Fresno Bee and its holding
company, respectively, The McClatchy Company and McClatchy
Newspapers, Inc., violated the unfair competition law by failing to
pay the carriers' mileage expenses as required by Labor Code
section 2802.  The primary issue at trial was whether the carriers
were employees or independent contractors.  The trial court
determined the carriers were independent contractors and, as a
result, entered judgment in favor of The Bee.

On appeal, the carriers contend (1) the trial court misallocated
the burden of proof; (2) the trial court erred in relying on a
regulation promulgated by the Employment Development Department
(EDD), which the carriers contend is irrelevant; (3) the trial
court erred in its application of the relevant test, as set out in
S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations
(1989) 48 Cal.3d 341, (4) under Borello, the carriers are
employees; (5) the trial court erred in relying on equitable
considerations to determine The Bee's liability; and (6) the trial
court improperly relied on testimony from unrepresentative class
members.  In supplemental briefing, the carriers additionally argue
the test for employment set out in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v.
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 903 applies, and the carriers are
employees under that test.

The Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District, agreed that the
question of whether the carriers are employees or independent
contractors must be determined under the Borello test.  As such,
the trial court erred in deferring to the EDD regulations, which
the appeals court concluded are inapplicable.

The appeals court also held that, ultimately, the trial court also
failed to properly analyze the factors required by Borello, and
therefore the lower court's decision must be reversed.  The appeals
court, however, declined to resolve whether the carriers are
employees or independent contractors, and instead remanded for the
trial court to address this question.

The appeals case is VERONICA BECERRA et al., Plaintiffs and
Appellants, v. THE McCLATCHY COMPANY et al., Defendants and
Respondents, No. F074680 (Cal. App.).

A full-text copy of the Opinion dated Sept. 30, 2021, is available
at https://is.gd/tBUdiP from Leagle.com.

Callahan & Blaine, Daniel J. Callahan, Esq. --
dcallahan@callahan-law.com -- Michael J. Sachs, Esq. --
msachs@callahan-law.com -- and Scott D. Nelson, Esq. --
snelson@callahan-law.com -- for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, Allison Arabian and John S.
Poulos, Esq. -- John.Poulos@lewisbrisbois.com -- Law Offices of
William C. Hahesy and William C. Hahesy; Perkins Coie, Eric D.
Miller and Jill L. Ripke, Esq. -- JRipke@perkinscoie.com --
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman and Derek M. Mayor for Defendants
and Respondents.

                         About McClatchy Co.

The McClatchy Co. -- https://www.mcclatchy.com/ -- is an American
publishing company.  On Feb. 13, 2020, The McClatchy Company and 53
affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case
No. 20-10418) with a Plan of Reorganization that will cut $700
million of funded debt in half.  McClatchy was estimated to have
$500 million to $1 billion in assets and debt of at least $1
billion as of the bankruptcy filing.  The Honorable Michael E.
Wiles presided over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
general bankruptcy counsel; Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as
co-bankruptcy counsel with Skadden; Groom Law Group as special
counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial advisor; and Evercore
Inc. as investment banker.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the
claims agent.

The Debtors won confirmation of their bankruptcy-exit plan on
September 25, 2020.  The case has been renamed In re JCK Legacy
Company et al.


MCK USA 1: Seeks to Hire Related ISG Realty as Broker
-----------------------------------------------------
MCK USA 1, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to hire Related ISG Realty to sell
or secure a lease for its real property in Miami.

Related ISG Realty will be compensated as follows:

     a. The broker's fee is contingent upon procurement of an
appropriate tenant, and upon such, Related ISG Realty is entitled
to a fee of (i) 10 percent of the gross value of the lease if the
tenant does not have its own broker; or (ii) 10 percent of the
gross value of the lease if the tenant does have its own broker, to
be split as 5 percent to each broker.

     b. The broker's fee is contingent upon sale of the property,
which would not be made until the closing specified in the sales
contract: (i) 6 percent of the total purchase price if the buyer
does not have its own broker; or (ii) 6 percent of the purchase
price if the buyer has its own broker, to be split as 3 percent to
each broker.

As disclosed in court filings, Related ISG Realty does not hold
interests adverse to the Debtor's bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Bruno Baiao
     Related ISG Realty
     2875 NE 191st Street, Suite 200
     Aventura, FL 33180
     Mobile: 786-201-6117
     Office: 305-932-6365
     Email: aguabruno@gmail.com

                        About MCK USA 1 LLC

MCK USA 1, LLC, a Miami, Fla.-based company engaged in renting and
leasing real estate properties, filed its voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-18197) on Aug.
24, 2021, listing $2 million in assets and $2.29 million in
liabilities.  Mario Peixoto, company owner, signed the petition.
Judge Robert A. Mark presides over the case.  Adina Pollan, Esq.,
at Pollan Legal serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


MEADE INSTRUMENTS: Sheppard Mullin Agrees to Pay $4.45 Million
--------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill of Bloomberg Law reports that telescope manufacturer
Meade Instruments Corp. and Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
reached a $4.45 million settlement over claims stemming from an
antitrust lawsuit that ultimately led to Meade's bankruptcy.

Meade's competitor, Orion Telescopes and Binoculars, won a $16
million jury verdict against Meade and its affiliates in 2019.
Meade faced total liability in excess of $50 million once treble
damages were applied.  But the company, which received court
approval of its bankruptcy plan in April 2021, filed Chapter 11
before a federal district court in California could enter final
judgment.

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP ("SMRH"), Michael
Scarborough, Leo D. Caseria, Dylan Ballard, and Will Chuchawat
previously represented Meade Instruments Corp. beginning in or
about November 2016, including providing advice to Meade and on
Meade's behalf in a litigation entitled Optronic Technologies, Inc.
v. Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., et al., Case No. 5:16-cv-06370-EJD
("Antitrust Litigation"),  in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) (the
ā€œDistrict Courtā€) and in matters related thereto.  They also
represented Debtorā€™s co-defendants in the Antitrust Litigation,
Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. ("Ningbo Sunny") and Sunny
Optics, Inc. ("Sunny Optics").   Sunny Optics is the 100%
shareholder of Meade.   Peter (Wenjun) Ni is the CEO of Sunny
Optics, and is the CEO of Ningbo Sunny.  Ningbo Sunny is the parent
of Sunny Optics.  Sunny Optics is a holding company with its sole
asset being the 100% ownership of Meade.

In November 2019, a jury in the Antitrust Litigation issued a
verdict against
the Debtor and its co-defendants.  Meade's competitor, Orion
Telescopes and Binoculars, won a $16 million jury verdict against
Meade and its affiliates.

In December 2019, Meade and Sunny Optics filed a voluntary petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code.


The Debtor paid some, but not all, of the fees and costs of SMRH in
connection with the Representation.  On April 16, 2020, SMRH filed
a proof of claim -- Claim No. 30 -- in the Meade Bankruptcy
Proceeding in which it asserted a claim of $2,686,410 for unpaid
fees and costs.

In its amended bankruptcy schedules filed on April 16, 2020 and in
a further amended schedule A/B filed on Dec. 4 2020, the Debtor
identified potential claims against SMRH as an asset of Meade's
bankruptcy estate.  Meade believed that it had claims against SMRH,
et al., for, including but not limited to, legal malpractice,
breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers and preference
payments.  

As a result of Mediation, Broadway Advisors, LLC (the plan agent
for the Debtors) and SMRH agreed to settle and resolve all
disputes.

In consideration of the mutual general releases and covenants not
to sue, SMRH shall (1) file a notice of withdrawal of the SMRH
Proof of Claim; and (2) pay Meade Instruments Corp. $4,450,000 by
wire transfer, which wiring instructions shall be provided
separately to SMRH's counsel.

The Plan Agent has carefully performed a cost-benefit analysis in
weighing the benefit of the settlement against the prospects of
proceeding with the litigation, and has concluded that the
settlement presents a fair and reasonable resolution to the
litigation.  The settlement results in funds flowing into the
estate that will be available for distribution under the Plan, and
will likewise put the Plan Agent in a position to seek the entry of
a final decree closing the case.

                  About Meade Instruments Corp.

Meade Instruments Corp. designs and manufactures optical products,
including telescopes, cameras, binoculars, and sports optics
products.

Meade Instruments Corp. filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
19-14714) on Dec. 4, 2019. In the petition signed by Victor
Aniceto, president, the Debtor was estimated to have $10 million to
$50 million in both assets and liabilities. Marc C. Forsythe, Esq.,
at Goe Forsythe & Hodges LLP, is the Debtor's legal counsel.  Sall
Spencer Callas & Krueger, a Law Corporation, and Parker Mills LLP,
each serves as co-special litigation counsel.

On Dec. 4, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving
the Debtorā€™s employment of Sall Spencer Callas & Krueger, a Law
Corporation and Parker Mills, LLP

                           *    *    *

In or around February 2021, a First Amended Plan of Reorganization
for Meade was proposed by the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors in the Meade Bankruptcy Proceeding, which Plan was
confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court by order entered on or about May
4, 2021 and which became effective on June 1, 2021.  The Plan
became effective on June 1, 2021.


MORGAN STANLEY 2013-C10: Fitch Lowers Class H Certs Rating to 'C'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded five and affirmed 11 classes of Morgan
Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust, commercial mortgage
pass-through certificates, series 2013-C10 (MSBAM 2013-C10).

    DEBT                RATING            PRIOR
    ----                ------            -----
MSBAM 2013-C10

A-3 61762MBV2      LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf
A-3FL 61762MAW1    LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf
A-3FX 61762MAY7    LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf
A-4 61762MBW0      LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf
A-5 61762MCC3      LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf
A-S 61762MBY6      LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf
A-SB 61762MBU4     LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf
B 61762MBZ3        LT Asf    Downgrade    AA-sf
C 61762MCB5        LT BBBsf  Affirmed     BBBsf
D 61762MBC4        LT B-sf   Downgrade    BBsf
E 61762MBE0        LT CCCsf  Downgrade    Bsf
F 61762MBG5        LT CCCsf  Affirmed     CCCsf
G 61762MBJ9        LT CCsf   Downgrade    CCCsf
H 61762MBL4        LT Csf    Downgrade    CCsf
PST 61762MCA7      LT BBBsf  Affirmed     BBBsf
X-A 61762MBX8      LT AAAsf  Affirmed     AAAsf

Classes X-A is IO.

The exchangeable class PST can be exchanged for classes A-S, B, and
C.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Increased Certainty of Loss: The downgrades are based on the
increasing certainty of loss on the specially serviced loans,
particularly Westfield Citrus Park and the Mall at Tuttle Crossing.
There is a substantial concentration of Fitch Loans of Concern (48%
of the pool), including five specially serviced loans (23.7%).
Fitch's current ratings reflect a base case loss of 10.6%. The
Negative Rating Outlooks reflect losses that could reach 12.3%
after factoring in potential outsized losses on the specially
serviced malls as well as the overall impact of the pandemic on the
pool.

The largest contributor to loss is the specially serviced Westfield
Citrus Park loan (10% of the pool). The loan transferred to special
servicing in July 2020 due to imminent default after missing its
May 2020 debt service payment. The sponsor, Westfield Group, has
been cooperating with a friendly foreclosure. A consensual
foreclosure and receiver motion was filed in December 2020 with a
receivership order entered in January 2021. All rents are being
captured through a cash trap.

The loan is secured by a 494,189-sf portion of a 1.0 million-sf
regional mall located in Tampa, FL. The mall is anchored by
non-collateral Dillard's, Macy's and JCPenney. A dark
non-collateral former Sears is reportedly being redeveloped as a
multipurpose entertainment center. The largest collateral tenants
include Regal Cinemas and Dick's Sporting Goods.

TTM June 2021 comparable in-line sales were approximately $120psf
compared to $379psf at YE 2019, and $378psf at issuance (TTM April
2013). The 20-screen Regal Cinemas, which reopened in May 2021
after closing in October 2020 due to COVID, had reported sales of
$292,100/screen in 2019, compared to $365,400/screen in 2017 and
$407,050/screen in 2016.

Three other regional mall properties are located in the same trade
area and within 13 miles of the subject property. The main
competition is Westfield Countryside, which is also undergoing a
friendly foreclosure, a 1.3 million-sf mall located 13 miles
southwest from the subject property in Clearwater, FL, and managed
by Westfield. Three of the anchors, Dillard's, Macy's and JCPenney,
overlap with the subject property. The mall also has a Whole Foods.
International Plaza and Westshore Plaza are both located
approximately 11 miles southeast of the subject. International
Plaza, which is managed by Taubman and targets shoppers in a higher
price segment, is a 1.2 million-sf mall anchored by Nordstrom,
Dillard's and Neiman Marcus. Westshore Plaza, which is managed by
Washington Prime Group, is a 1.1 million-sf mall with overlapping
anchors, Macy's, JCPenney, Dick's Sporting Goods and a dark former
Sears.

Fitch modeled a 46% loss in its base case which implies an
approximate 15% cap rate to YE 2019 NOI. Due to potential further
volatility, an additional sensitivity was performed, which assumed
a potential outsized loss of 60% on the loan's maturity balance,
which implies an approximate 20% cap rate on 2019 NOI.

The next largest contributor to loss is the Southdale Center loan
(7.1%), which is secured by 634,880-sf portion of a 1.2 million-sf
mall located in Edina, MN. Former collateral anchor Herberger's
closed in August 2018, as part of Bon-Ton's bankruptcy proceedings.
JCPenney, a non-collateral anchor, closed in June 2017, leaving
only one anchor, Macy's, open at the mall. Per the March 2021 rent
roll, collateral occupancy was 48% with total mall occupancy at
65%. The servicer reported YE 2020 NOI DSCR was 1.51x.

Despite the dark anchor spaces, the sponsor, Simon Property Group,
has undertaken an extensive redevelopment plan at the property. The
former JCPenney was demolished and replaced by a 120,000-sf Life
Time Fitness and approximately 35,000sf of office space, completed
in late 2019. Additional development on outparcels includes a
146-key Homewood Suites that opened in September 2018; a four-story
Restoration Hardware showroom; a 3,800 sf Shake Shack; and a
232-unit multifamily property that opened in July 2015. Fitch's
modeled loss of 23% reflects an implied cap rate of 13.5% on YE
2019 NOI.

The third largest contributor to loss is the specially serviced
Mall at Tuttle Crossing loan (2.2%), which is secured by a
385,057-sf portion of a 1.1 million sf regional mall located in
Dublin, OH. The loan transferred to special servicing in July 2020;
in August 2020 the sponsor, Simon Property Group, disclosed that
they plan to return the collateral to the lender. The
non-collateral anchors include Macy's, JCPenney, Scene 75, and a
dark former Sears. Comparable in-line tenant sales were $299 psf in
2019, compared to $324 in 2018, $337 psf in 2017 and $365 psf in
2016. Fitch's modeled loss of 53% in the base case implies an
approximate 20% cap rate on YE 2019 NOI. An additional sensitivity
was performed, assuming an outsized loss of 65% on the loan's
maturity balance. This additional sensitivity implies an
approximate 30% cap rate on YE 2019 NOI.

Minimal Change to Credit Enhancement (CE), Significant Defeasance:
As of the August 2021 distribution date, the pool's aggregate
principal balance has paid down by 16.5% to $1.24 billion from $1.5
billion at issuance. Eight loans (14.8%) have been defeased.

Six loans (21.7% of the pool) are full-term interest only while all
other performing loans are amortizing. All loans are scheduled to
mature or have an ARD by July 2023 (96.2%) or 2028 (3.8%).

Alternative Loss Considerations: Fitch's analysis included an
additional sensitivity scenario that assumed potential outsized
losses of 60% and 65%, respectively, on the current balances of the
Westfield Citrus Park and Mall at Tuttle Crossing loans. This
additional sensitivity scenario contributed to maintaining the
Negative Outlooks on classes A-S through D.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- The senior AAA classes are unlikely to be downgraded given the
    substantial CE and significant defeasance, but could be
    downgraded should they suffer interest shortfalls. Class A-S
    through D are subject to downgrade should overall loss
    expectations increase, in particular, on the loans secured by
    regional malls. The distressed classes E and below are subject
    to further downgrade should additional loans transfer to
    special servicing or should losses be realized or become more
    certain on specially serviced loans.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Upgrades to classes B through C would only occur with
    significant improvement in CE and/or increased defeasance, but
    would be limited while Westfield Citrus Park and the Mall at
    Tuttle Crossing remain in special servicing. Classes would not
    be upgraded above 'Asf' if there is a likelihood of interest
    shortfalls. Upgrades to classes D and below are considered
    unlikely unless the specially serviced loans liquidate with
    recoveries well above expectations.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance
transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as
the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings
are based on historical performance.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Form ABS Due Diligence-15E was not provided to, or reviewed by,
Fitch in relation to this rating action.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

MSBAM 2013-C10 has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Exposure to
Social Impacts due to the exposure to the sustained structural
shift in secular preferences affecting consumer trends, occupancy
trends, etc., which has a negative impact on the credit profile,
and is relevant to the rating[s] in conjunction with other
factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


NEUBASE THERAPEUTICS: Signs Separation Agreement With CFO
---------------------------------------------------------
NeuBase Therapeutics, Inc. and Sam Backenroth, the company's chief
financial officer, entered into a separation agreement and general
release dated Sept. 30, 2021, pursuant to which the CFO is entitled
to (i) the continuation of his current monthly base salary of
$31,750 for a period of six months, (ii) immediate vesting of Mr.
Backenroth's stock option grant dated July 12, 2019 covering
772,923 shares of the company's common stock, and (iii) an
extension of Mr. Backenroth's post-termination exercise period of
his outstanding stock options that are vested as of his last date
of employment to March 31, 2024.

The separation agreement includes a customary release of claims by
Mr. Backenroth in favor of the company and its affiliates as well
as a provision limiting the number of shares of the company's
common stock that may be sold by Mr. Backenroth on a daily basis
through June 30, 2024, unless authorized by the company.

On Aug. 10, 2021, Mr. Backenroth notified NeuBase of his intent to
resign from the company, effective Sept. 30, 2021.  Mr.
Backenroth's resignation is not a result of any disagreement with
NeuBase or any matter relating to its accounting or financial
policies or procedures, according to the company.

                     About NeuBase Therapeutics

NeuBase Therapeutics, Inc. -- http://www.neubasetherapeutics.com--
is a biotechnology company focused on developing next generation
therapies to treat rare genetic diseases and cancers caused by
mutant genes.  The Company's modular peptide-nucleic acid antisense
oligo platform which outputs "anti-gene" candidate therapies is
designed to combine the specificity of genetic sequence-based
target recognition with a modularity that enables use of various in
vivo delivery technologies to enable broad and also selective
tissue distribution capabilities.

Neubase Therapeutics reported a net loss of $17.38 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $26.13 million
for the year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the
Company had $69.32 million in total assets, $9.04 million in total
liabilities, and $60.28 million in total stockholders' equity.


NEXTERA ENERGY: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDRs, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDRs) of NextEra Energy Partners, LP (NEP) and its subsidiary,
NextEra Energy Operating Partners, LP (NEP Opco) at 'BB+' with a
Stable Rating Outlook. Due to strong legal ties, the IDRs of the
two entities are the same. Fitch has also affirmed the 'BB+'/'RR4'
rating for the senior unsecured notes at NEP Opco. The 'RR4'
denotes average recoveries in an event of default.

The senior unsecured notes are absolutely and unconditionally
guaranteed by NEP. The notes also have an upstream guarantee from
NextEra Energy US Partners Holdings, LLC (US Holdings), which is a
subsidiary of NEP Opco. US Holdings is the borrower on the
revolving credit facility, which is guaranteed by NEP Opco.

NEP's ratings are driven by relatively stable cash flows generated
by its portfolio of long-term contracted wind, solar and natural
gas pipeline assets and sponsor affiliation with NextEra Energy,
Inc. (NextEra; A-/Stable). Fitch expects NEP's Holdco FFO leverage
ratio to range between 3.7x-4.3x over 2021-2023. NEP's ratings also
reflect an above-peer 12%-15% distribution growth target and the
structural subordination of Holdco debt to limited recourse project
debt financings, tax equity and convertible equity portfolio
financings (CEPFs).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Contractual Cash Flows and Asset Diversity: Fitch favorably views
NEP's portfolio of wind, solar and natural gas pipeline assets,
which have long-term offtake arrangements with creditworthy
counterparties and minimal exposure to either volumetric or
commodity risks. As of Dec. 31, 2020, the renewable energy and
pipeline projects had a total weighted average remaining contract
term of approximately 15 years.

The distributions that NEP receives from its project subsidiaries
are well diversified by fuel and geography. As of September 2021
and including the portfolio recently acquired from Brookfield
Renewable, the distributions are split as approximately 57% from
wind assets, 21% from solar and 22% from natural gas pipeline
assets based upon 2021 run rate project level cash available for
distribution (CAFD). The high proportion of wind in NEP's portfolio
is of modest concern given intermittency of the wind resource. As
an example, poor wind resource in the second quarter of 2021 led to
modestly weaker financial results. However, a wide geographic
footprint of its wind portfolio mitigates NEP's exposure somewhat.
Overall, the portfolio derives 38% of its CAFD from Western U.S.,
15% from Midwest, 16% from South, 22% from Texas and 9% from
Northeastern U.S.

The concentration risk of the portfolio has materially decreased as
NEP's size and scale has increased. NEP currently operates 59
projects, of which the top five projects (i.e. NET Mexico Pipeline,
Meade Pipeline, Genesis solar, Silver State South and Desert
Sunlight solar projects) contribute approximately 36% of CAFD.

No Impact from Coronavirus and Uri: The pandemic has not had any
material impact on NEP's operations and access to capital. NEP's
portfolio is under long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) with
minimal volumetric risk. NEP's PPAs counterparties are typically
highly creditworthy and have continued to perform as per the
offtake agreements during the pandemic. NEP's wind portfolio
performed well during winter storm Uri and did not suffer adverse
financial outcomes unlike some of its peers. The Texas pipelines
also did not experience any major disruption in their operations
during the winter storm.

Robust Outlook for Wind and Solar Generation: In Fitch's view, the
accelerating decarbonization trend in power generation and customer
demand for cleaner generation should continue to drive wind and
solar generation in the U.S. Renewable generation continues to
attract bipartisan support and the recent extension of Production
Tax Credits for wind projects that begin construction in 2021 at a
rate of 60% is expected to support continued wind development until
2025. If Federal Clean Energy Standard becomes a reality, it could
provide a further boost to solar and wind development in the U.S.
As a result, NEP should find no scarcity of renewable assets to
acquire from third parties or its sponsor, NextEra, which currently
has more than 16.7GW of renewables backlog.

At the same time, the renewable industry has increasingly become
very competitive and equipment costs have increased due to
inflation and supply chain issues. Fitch has assumed that future
acquisitions by NEP are toward the lower end of 8%-10% implied CAFD
yield. However, NEP continues to have a competitive cost of
capital, which alleviates Fitch's concern around spread
compression.

Increased Complexity with CEPF financings: NEP is increasingly
reliant upon CEPF to finance its growth and has, since 2018,
entered into five such transactions with large institutional
investors to raise approximately $3.8 billion in total proceeds.
Fitch views CEPFs as an efficient way for NEP to issue equity,
layer in equity issuances over time and limit its exposure to any
underperformance of the asset portfolio. A competitive cost of
capital is critical to fund acquisitions to meet NEP's 12%-15%
distribution growth rate target, which is fairly aggressive
compared with the growth rate targeted by its peers.

However, the increased use of CEPFs has added financial complexity
to the organizational structure and makes NEP reliant on the
stability of capital markets and strength of its unit price to
execute the buyouts in a timely and cost-effective manner. While
NEP has the ability to issue non-recourse project debt to fund the
investor buyout in cash as a significant amount of assets in the
CEPFs are unencumbered, doing so will negatively affect Parent FFO.
Fitch believes it will be prudent for management to maintain
sufficient headroom in its Holdco leverage metrics to absorb the
resulting leverage creep.

Slippage in Counterparty Credit Quality: NEP's portfolio of assets
consists of long-term contracted projects with credit worthy
counterparties. The weighted average counterparty credit is 'BBB-',
based upon Fitch and other rating agencies' ratings. However, the
average counterparty rating has declined from 'A-' since 2017,
which is a concern. The decline has been driven in large part due
to the downgrade in ratings for the California investor owned
utilities. PG&E and Southern California Edison Company comprise 24%
of expected 2021 run rate CAFD. The ratings for Pemex, which
comprises 9% of expected 2021 run rate CAFD, have also declined to
'BB-' from 'BBB+' in 2016. Excluding PG&E and Pemex, average
counterparty credit quality is 'BBB+'.

Metrics in Line: The ratings of NEP and NEP Opco reflect the
structural subordination of their debt to the limited recourse debt
or tax equity at the project level. The project debt for renewable
projects is typically sized to yield a debt service coverage ratio
(DSCR) greater than 1.2x and generate a low 'BBB-'/'BBB' rating.
The debt typically matures within the expiration date of the
long-term contracts on any project. Most recent DSCRs provided to
Fitch by NEP indicate that all projects with limited recourse
project debt financings are performing well in excess of their DSCR
thresholds.

Fitch expects Holdco Debt/Parent Only FFO ratio to be in the
3.7x-4.3x range from 2021-2023, which compares favorably with
management's target of 4.0x-5.0x. Fitch defines Parent Only FFO as
run rate project distributions less Holdco G&A expenses, fee for
management service agreement, credit fees and Holdco debt service
costs. In its calculation of Holdco debt, Fitch includes all debt
held at intermediate holding companies. At present, this adjustment
includes $205 million of Holdco financing at STX Holdings as well
as a $270 million revolver upon draw, which is expected to fund the
cash portion of the buyout for CEPF-4. Fitch assumes NEP will issue
non-recourse project debt at the asset level to fund the cash
buyout portions of other CEPFs, which is not included in Fitch's
Holdco debt calculation.

Strong Sponsor Support: NEP benefits from its affiliation with
NextEra, which is the largest renewable developer in the U.S. Aside
from the drop down of 990MWs at IPO, NEP has purchased
approximately 4.0GWs of additional wind and solar assets from
NextEra. NextEra has demonstrated other forms of sponsor support
such as the structural modification to the Incentive Distribution
Rights fee structure executed in the fourth quarter of 2017, which
lowered NEP's cost of equity and made future acquisitions more
accretive to LP unitholders.

NextEra provides to NEP its management, operational and
administrative services via various service agreements and also
financial management services through a cash sweep and credit
support agreement. These agreements will continue to exist subject
to the determination by NEP Board. The management service agreement
(MSA) between NextEra and NEP has a 20-year contract life and
cannot be terminated, except for cause. However, NEP's board will
have the ability to oversee the MSA.

NEP's Structural tax Advantages: Even though NEP is a C corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, it is not expected to pay
meaningful federal income taxes for at least 15 years because of
NOLs generated through MACRS depreciation benefits. NEP
distributions up to an investor's outside basis are expected to be
characterized as non-dividend distributions or return of capital
for at least the next eight years. This makes NEP competitive to
Master Limited Partnerships as a yield plus growth vehicle.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Fitch views NEP's ratings to be positively positioned compared to
those of Atlantica Sustainable Infrastructure Plc (Atlantica;
BB+/Stable) and Terraform Power (TERPO; BB-/Stable) due to
favorable geographic exposure, long-term contractual cash flows
with minimal regulatory risk, and association with a strong
sponsor. These factors more than offset NEP's relative higher
leverage, aggressive distribution growth strategy and weaker asset
composition owing to a larger concentration of wind assets.

All three have strong parent support. Fitch considers NEP best
positioned owing to NEP's association with NextEra, which is the
largest renewable developer in the U.S. This provides visibility to
NEP's LP distribution per unit growth targets, which at 12%-15% are
more aggressive than those of Atlantica's (5%-8%). TERPO has been
taken private and is no longer subject to public growth targets.
TERPO benefits from having Brookfield Asset Management (BAM;
A-/Stable) as a sponsor. Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
(BBB/Stable) has 44.2% ownership interest in Atlantica.

Atlantica's portfolio benefits from a large proportion of solar
generation assets that exhibit less resource variability. In
comparison NEP's portfolio consists of a larger exposure to wind
MWs. TERPO's utility scale portfolio consists of 41% solar and 59%
wind. NEP's concentration in wind is mitigated to certain extent by
its diverse geographic footprint. Fitch views NEP's geographic
exposure in the U.S. (100%) favorably as compared to TERPO's (68%)
and Atlantica's (30%). Atlantica's long-term contracted fleet has a
remaining contracted life of 17 years, higher than NEP's 15 years
and TERPO's 12 years.

NEP's forecasted credit metrics are stronger than TERPO's but
weaker than Atlantica's. Fitch forecasts NEP's Holdco debt to
Parent Only FFO ratio to be between 3.7x-4.3x over 2021-2023
compared with 6.0x for TERPO and mid-3x for Atlantica.

Fitch rates NEP, Atlantica and TERPO based on a deconsolidated
approach since their portfolio comprises assets financed using
non-recourse project debt or with tax equity.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Fitch has used P50 to determine its rating case production
    assumption and P90 to determine its stress case production
    assumption;

-- Buyout right exercised with CEPF and NEP to pay 70% of the
    buyout for CEPF 1, 2 and 4 in common units with the balance
    paid in cash;

-- Acquisition of operational and contracted assets over 2021-
    2023 to meet 12% to 15% distribution per unit growth;

-- Acquisition CAFD toward the lower end of 8% - 10% range;

-- Acquisitions funded with CEPFs and Holdco debt such that
    target capital structure is maintained;

-- Intermediate holding company debt treated as on credit, which
    includes $205 million at STX Holdings and $270 million non
    recourse revolving credit facility;

-- None of the project debt treated on-credit, which includes
    Fitch's assumption of future project debt issuances to fund
    the cash portion of CEPFs buyout.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- The structural subordination of the Holdco debt to the non
    recourse project debt, tax equity and CEPF CEPFs as well as
    management's 4.0x-5.0x target Holdco leverage ratio caps the
    IDR at 'BB+'.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Growth strategy underpinned by aggressive acquisitions,
    addition of assets in the portfolio that bear material
    volumetric, commodity or interest rate risks;

-- Material underperformance in the underlying assets that lends
    variability or shortfall to expected cash flow for debt
    service;

-- Lack of access to equity markets to fund growth that may cast
    uncertainty regarding NEP's financial strategy;

-- Higher than expected use of cash to fund the buyout of
    investors in CEPFs;

-- Distribution payout ratio approaching or exceeding 100%;

-- Holdco leverage ratio exceeding 5.0x on a sustainable basis.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: NEP has a $1.25 billion revolving credit
facility that matures in February 2026. The credit facility
provides for up to $400 million of LC borrowing capacity. NEP has
an accordion in its revolving facility up to a total commitment
size of $2.0 billion. The facility provides flexibility for NEP to
finance acquisitions partly through revolver borrowings, which can
be subsequently termed out through equity and debt capital market
issuances. As of June 30, 2021, NEP did not have any amount
outstanding under its revolving credit facility.

ISSUER PROFILE

NEP is a growth-oriented limited partnership that acquires, manages
and owns contracted clean energy projects with stable long-term
cash flows. As of June 30, 2021, NEP owned a controlling,
non-economic general partner interest and a 43% limited partner
interest in NEP OpCo and NextEra owned a noncontrolling 57.0%
limited partner interest in NEP Opco. Through NEP OpCo, NEP owns a
portfolio of contracted renewable generation assets consisting of
wind and solar projects, as well as seven contracted natural gas
pipeline assets. NEP intends to grow primarily through acquisition
of projects either from NextEra or via third-party acquisitions.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch includes debt held at intermediate holding companies in its
Holdco debt calculations.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


NSM TOP HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg., Affirms 'B' ICR
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to negative from stable and
affirmed its 'B' issuer credit and senior secured debt ratings on
NSM Top Holdings Corp.

S&P said, "Our negative outlook reflects our belief that near-term
challenges, such as higher labor costs and supply chain disruption,
could pressure EBITDA margins and cash flows, resulting in elevated
adjusted leverage (above 8x) and negative FOCF over an extended
period.

"Adjusted leverage of about mid-8x as of the 12 months ended June
30, 2021, and negative FOCF of about $7 million in the first half
of 2021 suggest a higher risk that the company may not meet our
base case forecast, especially with the uncertainty regarding
COVID-19.

"While we expect order volume and backlog to continue to increase
for the remainder of 2021 as patient demand returns for mobility
products, the uncertainty about COVID-19 cases due to the delta
variant could reduce order volume and impair the company's ability
to fulfill the backlog. Resources such as NSM's assistive
technology professionals (ATPs) and the supply chain can also
potentially be hurt by the pandemic. Acquisitions, such as the
company's recent acquisition of the second-largest complex
rehabilitation technology (CRT) player in Canada, may partially
offset revenue shortfalls due to the slightly extended transaction
cycle. We project that the company's S&P Global Ratings' adjusted
leverage will be below 8x and FOCF will be negative $10 million for
2021. We believe the negative FOCF is temporary because it includes
the pay down of Medicare Advances and deferred taxes."

For the 12 months ended June 30, 2021, the company reported revenue
of about $510 million (net of bad debt expenses), representing
growth of about 6% year over year. Acquisitions account for the
bulk of revenue growth because the company has experienced slight
same-store decline. Adjusted EBITDA margin has shown improvement
every quarter since the fourth quarter of 2020, but remained below
pre-pandemic levels.

High exposure to government reimbursement, narrow business focus on
the CRT market, and supplier concentration remain key risks.

NSM generates 57% of revenue from Medicare and Medicaid, which
gives limited flexibility to negotiate reimbursement rates. It
operates in a relatively small and fragmented CRT market in the
U.S. with a limited revenue base of about $510 million (net of bad
debt expenses) in the 12-month period ended June 30, 2021. In the
CRT segment, NSM assembles and customizes the chairs for patients,
but the company does not manufacture wheelchairs and has to rely on
third-party suppliers for components, which makes supplier
concentration, with NSM's top three suppliers accounting for 55% of
its costs, an important factor in our business risk assessment.

Industry dynamics are generally favorable, with growth supported by
the aging population and nondiscretionary nature of the company's
products; its leading market position also provides some
competitive advantage.

NSM is one of the leading national providers of complex
wheelchairs, related products, services, and home access services
to end users with permanent ambulatory disabilities. The company
benefits from favorable secular growth trends, including the aging
population and increasing awareness about wheelchair replacements.
In addition, S&P views these products as nondiscretionary for
patients with permanent mobility disabilities because they are
critical for long-term health and mobility. NSM generates a portion
of the revenue from pediatric patients, which provides
opportunities for ongoing services. It also generates some revenue
from wheelchair replacement, providing good revenue and cash flow
predictability.

In S&P's view, NSM's large base of skilled ATPs provides some
degree of competitive advantage against smaller regional players.
These ATPs develop and maintain client relationships and ensure
patients are evaluated and fitted appropriately. Its business also
depends on the referral relationship an ATP creates, which
generates additional revenue for NSM.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors for this
credit rating change:

-- Health and safety

The negative outlook reflects prospects that the company's
financial metrics, most notably leverage and free operating cash
flow, may remain weaker than our base case forecast, especially
given the uncertainty caused by COVID-19.

S&P could lower the rating if the company sustained leverage above
8x and reported FOCF below $10 million.

S&P said, "We could revise the outlook back to stable if we
believed the order volume would continue to increase and that the
company had sufficient ATP counts and supplies to support those
order intakes. In that case, we would expect NSM to continue
increasing its EBITDA margin and sustaining S&P Global Ratings'
adjusted leverage below 8x. We also expect reported FOCF of at
least $10 million-$15 million in 2022, with our belief that it will
continue to increase and achieve a sustainable level closer to
about $20 million thereafter."



OZOP ENERGY: To Sell $30 Million Worth of Securities
----------------------------------------------------
Ozop Energy Solutions, Inc. filed a Form S-3 registration statement
with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the sale
from time to time of common stock, warrants and units in one or
more offerings of up to $30 million in aggregate price.

The company will provide the specific terms of these securities in
supplements to this prospectus.  The prospectus supplements will
also describe the specific manner in which these securities will be
offered and may also supplement, update or amend information
contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus.

Ozop may offer these securities in amounts, at prices and on terms
determined at the time of offering.  The securities may be sold
directly, through agents, or through underwriters and dealers. If
agents, underwriters or dealers are used to sell the securities,
the company will name them and describe their compensation in a
prospectus supplement.

The company's common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Markets
Pink under the symbol "OZSC."  On Sept. 30, 2021, the closing price
of the common stock as reported was $0.0445 per share.

A full-text copy of the prospectus is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1679817/000149315221024363/forms-3.htm

                    About Ozop Energy Solutions

Ozop Energy Solutions (http://ozopenergy.com)invents, designs,
develops, manufactures, and distributes ultra-high-power chargers,
inverters, and power supplies for a wide variety of applications in
the defense, heavy industrial, aircraft ground support, maritime
and other sectors.  The Company's strategy focuses on capturing a
significant share of the rapidly growing renewable energy market as
a provider of assets and infrastructure needed to store energy.

OZOP Energy reported a net loss of $20.48 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $571,595 for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$9.42 million in total assets, $54.07 million in total liabilities,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $44.65 million.

Hackensack, New Jersey-based Prager Metis CPA's LLC, the Company's
auditor since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated April 15, 2021, citing that as of Dec. 31, 2020, the
Company had an accumulated deficit of $21,793,375 and a working
capital deficit of $4,604,189.  In addition, the Company has
generated losses since inception.  These factors, among others,
raise substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern.


PARALLAX HEALTH: Appoints Sonia Choi as Interim CEO
---------------------------------------------------
Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. executed an executive agreement for
the appointment of Sonia Choi as the company's interim chief
executive officer effective Sept. 14, 2021, pursuant to a
resolution of the board of directors dated Sept. 15, 2021.

The executive agreement replaces any other agreement between Ms.
Choi and the company or any of its subsidiaries, is for an initial
term of one year, and provides a base compensation of $185,000 per
annum.  It also provides for various performance bonuses, and
customary employee benefits, as well as performance-based stock
options to purchase shares of the company's common stock at an
exercise price of $0.052 for a period of five years from the date
of grant, to be granted upon satisfactory completion of performance
events.

Ms. Choi is a highly experienced executive who combines analytical
business strategies with results-driven creativity to identify new
opportunities to drive growth.  She has played key roles in
innovative startup companies, and has launched new initiatives for
small e-commerce companies.  She has also led successful business
development and marketing campaigns for NASDAQ traded companies.
In addition, Ms. Choi has assisted several startup companies in
securing Series A & Series B funding, and has commanded D&I
initiatives in the field of technology.

Ms. Choi is a patented inventor within the technology sector, and
is experienced in patent monetization and patent portfolio
management. She also has a background in the medical field as a
licensed PCA caregiver, having provided health care services at
Village Care Hospice in New York, as well as in the private sector.
Ms. Choi attended Boston University, majoring in Environmental
Studies.

Parallax believes Ms. Choi is qualified to be the company's interim
chief executive officer because of her extensive background and
experience in corporate leadership and development.

                           About Parallax

Headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida, Parallax Health
Sciences, Inc. -- http://www.parallaxcare.com-- is a healthcare
company focused on developing products and services that can
provide remote communication, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring
of patients on a proprietary platform.  Through its innovative
technologies, both patented and patent-pending, the Company's
principal mission is to deliver solutions that empower patients,
reduce costs, and improve the quality of care.

Parallax reported a net loss of $12.87 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $1.36 million
in total assets, $11.61 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $10.25 million.

Farmington Hills, Michigan-based Freedman & Goldberg CPAs, the
Company's auditor since 2016, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated May 15, 2020, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a net
capital deficiency and has significant contingencies that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


PARETEUM CORP: Incurs $6.6M Net Loss in Quarter Ended March 31
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pareteum Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $6.55 million on $15.47 million of revenue for the three months
ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $9.42 million on
$20.06 million of revenue for the three months ended March 31,
2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $52.04 million in total
assets, $71.47 million in total liabilities, $25.54 million in
redeemable preferred stock, and a total stockholders' deficit of
$44.97 million.

Since March 31, 2021, the Company received net proceeds of $6.5
million as a result of the issuance of Junior Convertible Notes.
Additionally, the Company was notified that the $0.8 million iPass
PPP Loan was entirely forgiven.  The Company also may sell up to an
additional $2.5 million in aggregate principal Junior Convertible
Notes under the Junior Convertible Notes Securities Purchase
Agreement.

The Company reported cash used in operating and investing
activities of $7.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2021
and $14.1 million in the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, after
considering the receipt of proceeds from the sale of assets of
$12.2 million.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company had cash balances
available for operations of $2.1 million.  Additionally, as of
March 31, 2021, the Company's total indebtedness, including the
redemption value of the Redeemable Preferred Stock, but excluding
lease liabilities, deferred financing costs and debt discounts, was
$45.0 million, which was comprised of the principal balances of the
Senior Convertible Note of $17.5 million, Junior Convertible Note
of $2.4 million, a term loan of $0.2 million, promissory notes of
$0.7 million, a related party loan of $0.3 million, the iPass PPP
Loan of $0.8 million, and the redemption value of the Redeemable
Preferred Stock of $23.1 million.

Pareteum said, "In light of our cash position and indebtedness, we
believe that we will not have sufficient resources to fund our
operations and meet our obligations under our debt instruments for
the twelve months following the filing of this Report.  Our
software platforms require ongoing funding to continue the current
development and operational plans and we will continue to expend
substantial resources for the foreseeable future in connection with
the continued development of our software platforms.  These
expenditures will include costs associated with research and
development activity, corporate administration, business
development, and marketing and selling of our services.  In
addition, other unanticipated costs may arise.

As a result, we believe that additional capital will be required to
fund our operations and provide growth capital to meet our
obligations under the Senior Convertible Note, the Junior
Convertible Notes, and the Redeemable Preferred Stock.
Accordingly, we will have to raise additional capital in one or
more debt and/or equity offerings and continue to work with our
lenders to cure the defaults, or otherwise seek other alternatives
to addressing our liquidity and capital resources issues.  There
can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in raising
the necessary capital or that any such offering will be available
to us on terms acceptable to us, or at all.  If we are unable to
raise additional capital that may be needed, this would have a
material adverse effect on the Company.  Furthermore, the recent
decline in the market price of our common stock, coupled with the
stock's delisting from the Nasdaq Stock Market, could make it more
difficult to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future
at a time and price that we deem appropriate.  The factors
discussed above raise substantial doubt as to our ability to
continue as a going concern within one year after the date that
this Report is issued."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1084384/000162828021017682/teum-20210331.htm

                     About Pareteum Corporation

Pareteum -- www.pareteum.com -- is a cloud software communications
platform company with a mission -- to Connect Every Person and
Every(Thing).  As a global provider of Communications
Platform-as-a-Service (CPaaS) solutions with operations in North
America, Latin America, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and
Asia-Pacific regions, Pareteum empowers enterprises, communications
service providers, early-stage innovators, developers,
Internet-of-Things (IoT), and telecommunications infrastructure
providers with the freedom and control to create, deliver and scale
innovative communications experiences.  The Pareteum platform
connects people and devices around the world using the secure,
ubiquitous, and highly scalable solution to deliver data, voice,
video, SMS/text messaging, media, and content enablement.

Pareteum reported a net loss of $44.66 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $222.35 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.

Los Angeles, California-based Baker Tilly US, LLP, the Company's
auditor since 2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated June 17, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from
operations, and had a negative working capital of $37.2 million and
an accumulated deficit of $584.6 million as of Dec. 31, 2020.  This
raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.  In addition, with respect to the ongoing and
evolving coronavirus outbreak, which was designated as a pandemic
by the World Health Organization on March 12, 2020, the outbreak
has cause substantial disruption in international and U.S.
economies and markets and if repercussions of the outbreak are
prolonged, could have a significant adverse impact on the Company's
business.


PARETEUM CORP: To Evaluate Strategic Alternatives
-------------------------------------------------
Pareteum Corporation announced that due to ongoing liquidity
requirements, it intends to evaluate a range of strategic
alternatives.  These strategic alternatives include, but are not
limited to, a sale or other business combinations, financing,
and/or restructuring transactions.

Pareteum has engaged FTI Capital Advisors, LLC to assist with the
evaluation process.

Mary Beth Vitale, Chair of the Board of Directors of the Company,
stated: "Our Board has determined that it is prudent at this time
to undertake this strategic review to ensure all available
alternatives for the Company are being evaluated.  Pareteum will
remain focused on our customers, vendors, employees, and other
constituents, as well as continue to run the day-to-day operations
as usual as it evaluates such alternatives."

The Company has not set a timetable for the conclusion of its
consideration of strategic alternatives, and it does not intend to
comment further unless and until a specific course of action has
been approved or the Company has otherwise determined that further
disclosure is appropriate or required and in accordance with the
requirements of applicable securities laws.

                    About Pareteum Corporation

Pareteum -- www.pareteum.com -- is a cloud software communications
platform company with a mission - to Connect Every Person and
Every(Thing).  As a global provider of Communications
Platform-as-a-Service (CPaaS) solutions with operations in North
America, Latin America, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and
Asia-Pacific regions, Pareteum empowers enterprises, communications
service providers, early-stage innovators, developers,
Internet-of-Things (IoT), and telecommunications infrastructure
providers with the freedom and control to create, deliver and scale
innovative communications experiences.  The Pareteum platform
connects people and devices around the world using the secure,
ubiquitous, and highly scalable solution to deliver data, voice,
video, SMS/text messaging, media, and content enablement.

Pareteum reported a net loss of $44.66 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $222.35 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company had
$52.04 million in total assets, $71.47 million in total
liabilities, $25.54 million in redeemable preferred stock, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $44.97 million.

Los Angeles, California-based Baker Tilly US, LLP, the Company's
auditor since 2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated June 17, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, negative cash flows from
operations, and had a negative working capital of $37.2 million and
an accumulated deficit of $584.6 million as of Dec. 31, 2020.  This
raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.  In addition, with respect to the ongoing and
evolving coronavirus outbreak, which was designated as a pandemic
by the World Health Organization on March 12, 2020, the outbreak
has cause substantial disruption in international and U.S.
economies and markets and if repercussions of the outbreak are
prolonged, could have a significant adverse impact on the Company's
business.


PENNSYLVANIA ECONOMIC: Fitch Affirms BB- on $114MM Parking Bonds
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'BB-' rating on the Pennsylvania
Economic Development Financing Authority's (PEDFA) $114 million of
outstanding senior parking revenue bonds. The Rating Outlook is
Negative.

RATING RATIONALE

The Negative Rating Outlook reflects the narrow liquidity position
of the parking system, which has been further challenged by
reimbursements to Dauphin County and Assured Guaranty for debt
service reserve draws. Although the parking system maintains
healthy coverage on a senior basis, coverage is significantly lower
for subordinate obligations. Resolution of the Negative Outlook
will depend on full repayment of reserve reimbursements to Dauphin
County and Assured Guaranty; recovery of parking demand to levels
generating debt service coverage metrics in excess of covenant
requirements; and an ability to address long-term capital needs.

The rating reflects the system's continued revenue underperformance
and more constrained financial profile, which has led to increased
risk related to asset preservation. In the short term, PEDFA's
financial commitments are currently being met. However, the
system's financial capacity to meet all future obligations,
including reimbursements to Dauphin County and Assured Guaranty for
draws on the debt service reserve fund and the funding of necessary
maintenance capex, is vulnerable to further deterioration in the
current economic environment.

The rating case reflects all-in coverage levels well below sum
sufficiency in 2021, and below covenanted levels through the
entirety of the forecast. The rating is further constrained by high
leverage and total cost obligations, minimal liquidity, limited
capital funding and uncertain rate-making flexibility to raise
rates due to the political climate. Parking system cash flows and
current fund balances remain narrow, providing limited internal
resources for maintenance capex due to the low priority in the
payment waterfall of capital reserve account replenishment.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Dominant Position, Lagging Performance: Revenue Risk (Volume) -
Weaker

The system includes 11 parking facilities with a total of 7,694
spaces and 1,260 spaces of on-street metered parking covering
around 70% of public parking in Harrisburg. Strong non-compete
covenants are expected to provide adequate market share protection.
However, while the high degree of governmental jobs in the area
provide some degree of demand stability by way of commonwealth
parking contracts, the system still depends on university
enrollment and economic growth in the Harrisburg area, and parking
revenues are likely to mirror the tepid historical performance.

Rate-Making Authority: Revenue Risk (Price) - Midrange

Contracted rate schedules provide for large increases in the
initial years, followed by annual escalators thereafter. Rates
currently remain competitive versus the national average, but could
become uncompetitive to the extent greater than inflationary rate
increases were to be needed to support revenue underperformance or
increased lifecycle cost investments. Further, political risk may
serve to limit rate-making flexibility.

Capital Plan Exhibits Risk: Infrastructure Development and Renewal
- Weaker

The weaker assessment reflects the system's foreseen inability to
generate excess cash flows to replenish the capital reserve account
until the end of 2023. Repayments to the debt service reserves,
which is expected to be complete by 2023, are prioritized higher
than capital reserves in the system's flow of funds. Funded with
bond proceeds, a $9.0 million capital reserve has been spent down
to a current level of $2.5 million and remains at risk of full
depletion.

Future funding of capex may rely on additional leveraging as
internal funding is structurally dependent on excess cash flow
following all other required deposits as the reserve is tapped. In
the medium term, management expects to spend $600,000 annually
until 2023, at which point cash flows are expected to be available
to replenish the capital reserve.

Structural Features Have Weaknesses: Debt Structure - Weaker

While the 2013A bonds are senior ranking in the project's debt
profile, structural features are lacking as shown through limited
requirements for liquidity and leverage protections, no established
operating reserves and debt service reserves funded through surety
policies. In addition, reserves for capital maintenance fall at the
bottom of the cash flow waterfall, which present funding risks for
ongoing capital investments. The system drew $1.7 million on debt
service reserves in January 2021 and expects to draw on reserves
for the next debt service principal payment in January 2022.
Repayment of the advances is priority below current debt service in
the cash flow waterfall. Senior tenor is long with a 30-year final
maturity and subject to some capital appreciation. The parking
system debt is fixed rate and fully amortizing.

Financial Profile

The system has an escalating debt service profile, including
capital appreciation, which requires aggressive revenue growth to
cover increasing debt service obligations as well as ongoing
capital needs. All-in coverage (inclusive of subordinate debt) at
YE 2020 (1x) fell below covenanted levels for the fourth time since
2013. Fitch's rating case forecasts senior-lien coverage to average
2.3x, based on a net revenue calculation. The average coverage of
total project costs, including subordinated obligations and capital
needs as well as debt service reserve draw reimbursements, is less
than sum sufficient at 0.8x. Liquidity also remains a concern with
minimal unrestricted cash and no operating reserves.

PEER GROUP

The closest publicly Fitch-rated peer is Miami Parking, rated
'A'/Stable. This parking credit represents a larger city system in
a very strong metropolitan statistical area and is financially
protected with significantly lower leverage, stronger liquidity and
stronger debt service coverage ratio (DSCR).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Material degradation of out-year parking and revenue
    expectations should the pandemic result in anticipated long
    term economic impairment;

-- Continued trend of narrow or insufficient cash flow
    generation;

-- Foreseen depletion of the capital reserve;

-- Delays in reserve draw repayment beyond the period outlined in
    bond indenture, or inability to reach reserve reimbursement
    agreements with Dauphin County and Assured Guaranty;

-- System condition report indicating deteriorating assets and/or
    greater annual capital needs than those currently forecast.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- The Rating Outlook may return to Stable if the system re
    establishes healthy debt service coverage in excess of the
    1.25x covenanted levels over successive fiscal years in
    conjunction with healthier system liquidity.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

CREDIT UPDATE

The pandemic has had a sizable effect on PEDFA's 2021 revenues to
date. Revenues through August 2021 are down 17% from pre-pandemic
levels in 2019, and are 10% below budgeted expectations. Operating
expenses are on budget, with cash flow being $1.7 million under
budget. Management attributes the rise in Delta variant cases for
having a negative impact on current and future revenues as well as
forecasted recovery.

Monthly garage contract rates increased in March and management
expects an additional increase to occur in 2022. The lease rate
with the Commonwealth also increased in January. While ticket rate
increases are subject to ordinance amendments with the City of
Harrisburg, management is planning for one to occur in 1Q2022.

Management forecasts that fiscal 2021 (ending Dec. 31) senior DSCR
on the Series A bonds will reach 2x and all-in DSCR net of senior
opex for the Series A, B and C bonds will reach 0.8x. In 2021,
management noted that PEDFA was able to make the July interest
payment; however, they expect to draw approximately $1.7 million on
the Series B and C debt service reserves for the Jan. 1, 2022 P&I
payment. PEDFA is responsible for reimbursing the Dauphin County
and Assured Guaranty for the reserve repayment within one year per
the bond indenture. PEDFA is engaging in discussions with Credit
Enhancers over potentially obtaining an extension. PEDFA expects to
fully repay Dauphin County and Assured Guaranty for this debt
service reserve draw by 2023.

Parking system cash flows and current fund balances remain very
narrow and provide limited internal resources for maintenance capex
as replenishment of the capital reserve account is low in priority
in the payment waterfall. Given the anticipated nearly $2 million
draw on reserves for the January principal payment on the
subordinate liens, the system does not expect to generate excess
cash flows to replenish the capital reserve account until after the
reserve advances are repaid to Dauphin County in 2023.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Fitch's rating case incorporates a 17% revenue decline in 2021
relative to 2019 based on YTD performance, with progressive
recovery to 2019 revenue levels by 2023. In both of the cases, 2021
and 2022 Series B and C debt service includes reimbursements
towards 2020 and 2021 shortfalls. Under this scenario,
Fitch-calculated senior DSCR averages 2.3x throughout the forecast
period, while all-in DSCR averages 1x, well below the rate covenant
of 1.25x. Fitch's all-in DSCR calculation includes senior expenses
pursuant to the trust indenture's flow of funds, but does not
include subordinate expenses or capex needed to maintain the
system. With the additional subordinate expenses and capex, DSCR is
below sum sufficient, averaging 0.8x through 2025. PEDFA's all-in
leverage is projected to reach 17.7x in 2021 and is expected to
steadily drop down to 12x by 2025.

Fitch's downside case assumes 19% revenue decline in 2021 relative
to 2019, followed by recovery to 2019 levels by 2024.
Fitch-calculated senior DSCR averages 2.2x throughout the forecast
period, while all-in DSCR (net of senior opex only) averages 0.9x,
which is below the rate covenant. The all-in average DSCR (net of
sub opex and capex) of 0.7x is less than sum sufficient. PEDFA's
total leverage is projected to reach 18x in 2021 and is expected to
steadily drop down to 12.4x by 2025.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


PHI GROUP: Changes Subsidiary Name to Empire Spirits, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------
PHI Group, Inc. has reinstated and changed the name of its
subsidiary Provimex, Inc., a Nevada company incorporated in
September 2004, to Empire Spirits, Inc. and has obtained a new Tax
Identification Number for this entity.  

Empire Spirits, Inc. will serve as the holding company for the
acquisition of Five Grain Treasure Spirits Co., Ltd., a baijiu
distiller in Jilin Province, China.

In addition, the Company has incorporated CO2-1-0 (CARBON) CORP., a
Wyoming corporation, as the holding company for a Carbon Mitigation
Initiative through Environmentally Sustainable projects using
Blockchain and Crypto Technologies in conjunction with
Indonesia-based CYFS Group.

                          About PHI Group

Headquartered in Irvine, California, PHI Group, Inc.
(www.phiglobal.com) primarily focuses on advancing PHILUX Global
Funds, a group of Luxembourg bank funds organized as "Reserved
Alternative Investment Fund", and building the Asia Diamond
Exchange in Vietnam.  The Company also engages in mergers and
acquisitions and invests in select industries and special
situations that may substantially enhance shareholder value.

PHI reported a net loss of $2.18 million for the year ended June
30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.93 million for the year
ended June 30, 2019.

Eastvale, California-based MS Madhava Rao, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated June 22, 2021, citing that the
Company has an accumulated deficit of $44,010,352 and stockholders'
deficit of $7,059,790 as of June 30, 2020.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


PHI GROUP: Forms Asia Diamond Exchange, Inc. Subsidiary
-------------------------------------------------------
PHI Group, Inc. has formed Asia Diamond Exchange, Inc., a Wyoming
corporation, Registration Number 2021-001010234, Employer
Identification Number 87-2893358 as a subsidiary of the company, to
develop and establish the Asia Diamond Exchange within the
envisaged Chulai Multi Commodities Center in the Free-Trade Zone of
the Chu Lai Open Economic Zone, Tam Quang Village, Nui Thanh
District, Quang Nam Province, Vietnam.

The ADE and CMCC projects will be carried out by Asia Diamond
Exchange, Inc. in conjunction with other international partners and
participants, including PHILUX Global Funds SCA, SICAV-RAIF, a
Luxembourg bank fund, 1c rue Gabriel Lippmann, Munsbach 5365,
Luxembourg and Gold Block Mining Co., Ltd., 4F, 143 Teheran-ro,
Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

                          About PHI Group

Headquartered in Irvine, California, PHI Group, Inc.
(www.phiglobal.com) primarily focuses on advancing PHILUX Global
Funds, a group of Luxembourg bank funds organized as "Reserved
Alternative Investment Fund", and building the Asia Diamond
Exchange in Vietnam.  The Company also engages in mergers and
acquisitions and invests in select industries and special
situations that may substantially enhance shareholder value.

PHI reported a net loss of $2.18 million for the year ended June
30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.93 million for the year
ended June 30, 2019.

Eastvale, California-based MS Madhava Rao, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated June 22, 2021, citing that the
Company has an accumulated deficit of $44,010,352 and stockholders'
deficit of $7,059,790 as of June 30, 2020.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


POST OAK: Seeks to Hire KapilaMukamal as Financial Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------
Post Oak TX, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to employ KapilaMukamal, LLP to
serve as its financial advisor.

The firm's services include:

     a. reviewing financial information about the Debtor, including
assets, liabilities and cash flow;

     b. providing litigation support to the Debtor;

     c. assisting the Debtor in preparing monthly operating reports
and in complying with the U.S. Trustee Guidelines;

     d. assisting the Debtor in the formulation, preparation and
confirmation of a plan of reorganization, and providing related
analyses including feasibility analysis for the Hilton Post Oak
Hotel and consideration of discount rates.

KapilaMukamal received a retainer in the amount of $25,000.

Soneet Kapila, a partner at KapilaMukamal, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Soneet R. Kapila
     KapilaMukamal, LLP
     1000 South Federal Highway, Suite 200
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316
     Telephone: (954) 761-1011
     Facsimile: (954) 761-1033
     Email: bmukamal@kapilamukamal.com

                      About Post Oak TX, LLC

West Palm Beach, Fla.-based Post Oak TX, LLC is part of the
traveler accommodation industry.  Post Oak TX filed a petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-18563) on Aug.
31, 2021, listing as much as $100 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Judge Erik P. Kimball oversees the case.

Andrew Zaron, Esq., at Leon Cosgrove, LLP and Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell, LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
KapilaMukamal, LLP is the financial advisor.


POST OAK: Seeks to Hire Leon Cosgrove as Bankruptcy Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Post Oak TX, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to employ Leon Cosgrove, LLC to
serve as legal counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's services include:

     (a) advising the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties
under the Bankruptcy Code and the continued management of its
business operations;

     (b) advising the Debtor with respect to compliance with the
U.S. trustee's operating guidelines and reporting requirements and
with the rules of the court;

     (c) preparing legal documents;

     (d) protecting the interests of the Debtor in all matters
pending before the court; and

     (e) representing the Debtor in the formulation, preparation
and confirmation of a plan of reorganization.

The firm will be paid as follows:

     Senior Partners     $695 per hour
     Other Partners      $500 to $650 per hour
     Associates          $375 to $425 per hour

Andrew Zaron, Esq., a partner at Leon Cosgrove, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Zaron disclosed that:

     -- Leon Cosgrove agreed to a discount off of its standard
hourly rates for senior partners;

     -- No Leon Cosgrove professional included in the engagement
varied his rate based on the geographic location of the bankruptcy
case;

     -- The billing rates for the firm's lawyers who will work on
this matter are as follows:

        Senior Partners      $695 per hour
        Other Partners       $500 to $650 per hour
        Associates           $375 to $425 per hour

     -- The Debtor approved a prospective budget and staffing plan
for a three-month period.

Leon Cosgrove can be reached at:

       Andrew D. Zaron, Esq.
       Leon Cosgrove, LLC
       255 Alhambra Circle, Suite 800
       Coral Gables, FL 33134
       Tel: (305) 740-1992
       Email: azaron@leoncosgrove.com

                      About Post Oak TX, LLC

West Palm Beach, Fla.-based Post Oak TX, LLC is part of the
traveler accommodation industry.  Post Oak TX filed a petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-18563) on Aug.
31, 2021, listing as much as $100 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Judge Erik P. Kimball oversees the case.

Andrew Zaron, Esq., at Leon Cosgrove, LLP and Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell, LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
KapilaMukamal, LLP is the financial advisor.


POST OAK: Seeks to Hire Morris Nichols as Bankruptcy Co-Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Post Oak TX, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to employ Morris, Nichols, Arsht &
Tunnell, LLP as co-counsel with Leon Cosgrove, LLC.

The firm's services include:

     a. performing all necessary services as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel, including, without limitation, legal advice in
the areas of restructuring and bankruptcy;

     b. taking all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate, including the prosecution of actions by the
Debtor, the defense of any actions commenced against the Debtor,
negotiations concerning litigation in which the Debtor is involved
and the filing of objections to claims filed against the estate;

     c. preparing legal papers;

     d. advising the Debtor regarding its rights and obligations;

     e. coordinating with other professionals in representing the
Debtor in connection with its case; and

     f. performing all other necessary legal services.  

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

          Partners                        $75 - $1,275 per hour
          Associates and Special Counsel  $455 - $795 per hour
         Paraprofessionals                $325 - $345 per hour

Morris Nichols received an advance payment retainer of $25,000.

Robert Dehney, Esq., a partner at Morris Nichols, disclosed in
court filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Dehney disclosed that:

     -- Morris Nichols agreed to a discount off of its standard
hourly rates for senior partners;

     -- No Morris Nichols professional included in the engagement
varied his rate based on the geographic location of the bankruptcy
case;

     -- The billing rates for the firm's lawyers who will work on
this matter are as follows:

         Partners                        $75 - $1,275 per hour
         Associates and Special Counsel  $455 - $795 per hour
         Paraprofessionals               $325 - $345 per hour

     -- The Debtor approved a prospective budget and staffing plan
for a three-month period.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert J. Dehney, Esq.
     Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP
     1201 North Market Street, 16th Floor
     Wilmington, DE 19899-1347
     Telephone: (302) 658-9200
     Facsimile: (302) 658-3989
     Email: mharvey@mnat.com

                      About Post Oak TX, LLC

West Palm Beach, Fla.-based Post Oak TX, LLC is part of the
traveler accommodation industry.  Post Oak TX filed a petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 21-18563) on Aug.
31, 2021, listing as much as $100 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Judge Erik P. Kimball oversees the case.

Andrew Zaron, Esq., at Leon Cosgrove, LLP and Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell, LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.
KapilaMukamal, LLP is the financial advisor.


QDOS INC: Justices Pass on Involuntary Bankruptcy Dismissal Fight
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill of Bloomberg Law reports that the U.S. Supreme Court
declined to wade into a dispute over whether a media company could
appeal a bankruptcy appellate panel's decision that restored its
involuntary bankruptcy case.

The decision Monday, October 4, 2021, lets stand a ruling by the
Ninth Circuit that QDOS Inc. couldn't appeal the panel's decision.

The bankruptcy appellate panel wasn't final, the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said.  Only certain BAP orders --
such as a final ruling that sets the parties' rights and
obligations -- are appealable, the Ninth Circuit said.

The case stems from an involuntary bankruptcy petition that alleged
creditors of QDOS Inc. filed in 2018.

                           About QDOS, Inc.

Based in Irvine, California, QDOS, Inc., d/b/a DeskSite, d/b/a DSN,
designs and provides video entertainment software applications.
DSN offers audiences complete video libraries from dozens of
America's most popular professional sports teams & leagues. Content
is accessible through team-branded apps on Smart TVs, computers,
tablets, streaming media players, Blu-ray players, and game
consoles.  Each team's unique individual brand identity is firmly
maintained via team-branded portals, while aggregating all viewers
under a single network for advertising purposes.  

Petitioning creditors Carl Wiese, Matthew Hayden, and Felice
Terrigno filed an involuntary chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 18-11997) on May 31, 2018.


QUANTUM CORP: Registers 5.9 Million Shares Under 2012 LTIP
----------------------------------------------------------
Quantum Corporation filed a Form S-8 registration statement with
the Securities and Exchange Commission to register 5,900,000 shares
of common stock that are issuable under the company's 2012
Long-Term Incentive Plan.  The additional shares have become
available for issuance under an amendment and restatement of the
Incentive Plan, approved by the company's stockholders on Sept. 21,
2021.  

A full-text copy of the prospectus is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/709283/000070928321000062/quantum-sx82012planamendme.htm

                        About Quantum Corp.

Based in San Jose, California, Quantum Corp. (NYSE:QTM) --
http://www.quantum.com-- provides technology and services that
stores and manages video and video-like data delivering the
industry's top streaming performance for video and rich media
applications, along with low cost, high density massive-scale data
protection and archive systems.  The Company helps customers
capture, create and share digital data and preserve and protect it
for decades.

Quantum reported a net loss of $35.46 million for the year ended
March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $5.21 million for the
year ended March 31, 2020.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$178.18 million in total assets, $291.11 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $112.93 million.


QURATE RETAIL: Fitch Affirms 'BB' LongTerm IDRs, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Qurate Retail, Inc.'s (Qurate), Liberty
Interactive LLC's and QVC Inc.'s Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDRs) at 'BB' and all related issue ratings. Fitch has also
revised the Recovery Rating on Qurate's cumulative redeemable
preferred shares to 'RR5' from 'RR6', consistent with Fitch's
revised "Corporates Recovery Ratings and Instrument Ratings
Criteria," dated April 9, 2021. Fitch has removed Qurate from Under
Criteria Observation (UCO).

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Operating Performance: During the pandemic, Qurate outperformed
Fitch's expectations, growing LTM ended June 30, 2021 total
revenues 8% and 6% over 2020 and 2019, respectively. The average
existing customer at QxH, Qurate's US video commerce business and
its largest segment, spent approximately $1,400 on 28 items, in
line with overall historical performance. In addition, QxH's total
customer count increased 3% over LTM ended June 30, 2020 and 7%
over 2019, while new customers increased by 5% and 17%,
respectively, over the same periods. 2019 results are included to
show the resiliency of the company's model excluding the pandemic's
effects.

Business Model: Qurate's unique business model bore fruit during
the pandemic as consumers were unable or unwilling to shop at
physical retail locations. The company focuses on creating and
maintaining customer interest through direct-to-consumer engagement
on its leading video platforms and Internet and mobile platforms,
differentiating the company from brick-and-mortar or transactional
ecommerce platforms. However, while the economy's full recovery
timeline remains fluid given continued uncertainties around the
pandemic, the model's strength may be tested in the face of growing
competitive pressures as people increasingly return to in-person
activities.

Secular Evolution and Challenges: U.S. retailers remain pressured
by growing ecommerce competition and the shift to lower priced
alternatives. As one of the top 10 North American ecommerce
retailers, Qurate is relatively well positioned. In FY2020,
ecommerce revenues grew 11% and represented approximately 63% of
Qurate's total revenues, up from 59% in FY2019. In addition, while
its customer base remains stable despite price competition, the
company has instituted price matching on some of its platforms.
Management has demonstrated an aggressive focus on addressing its
challenges, and Fitch believes the 'BB' rating remains
appropriate.

HSN Consolidation Synergies: Following HSN's integration, Qurate
identified $370 million to $400 million in cost savings to be
realized by 2022 (approximately 70% realized through Dec. 31, 2020,
roughly in line with Fitch estimates). Fitch's rating case
estimates Qurate will achieve approximately 93% ($360 million) of
the range's midpoint. Fitch's estimates are based on varying
expectations for synergy realizations based on the category and
scope of the expected expense cuts, the probability of realizing
reductions within each category, and typical industry expense cut
realizations. Although Qurate stated they expect to realize revenue
synergies, they have not disclosed an expected range, nor has Fitch
included any benefits in its rating case.

Shareholder Returns: In FY2020, Qurate distributed a special
dividend funded with a mix of cash on hand and the issuance of
cumulative redeemable preferred shares. Fitch assigned 0% equity
credit to the preferred shares which drove pro forma total leverage
to 4.0x, outside Fitch's negative rating sensitivity. However,
Qurate's total leverage has declined to 3.7x at June 30, 2021 and
QVC is well within its 2.5x negative rating leverage sensitivity
(2.1x at June 30, 2021).

Fitch's rating case also assumes Qurate will fund shareholder
returns with a mix of FCF and debt issuance at QVC, which maintains
a stated target net leverage of 2.5x. Fitch assumes the returns
will be comprised of a mix of share buybacks and another special
dividend and that both Qurate and QVC will remain within their
rating sensitivities over the rating horizon. Fitch expects QVC
will issue debt under the additional capacity created by EBITDA
growth, resulting primarily from consolidation synergies.

Rating Linkage: Fitch links Qurate, Liberty and QVC's Long-Term
IDRs in accordance with its criteria. Qurate's IDR, its wholly
owned subsidiary Liberty, and its indirect, wholly owned subsidiary
QVC, reflect the consolidated legal entity/obligor credit profile
and parent subsidiary relationships. Although Fitch does not
believe Qurate would spin out QVC, Fitch would review the rating in
that event.

QVC Debt Ratings: Fitch rates QVC's senior secured credit facility
and senior secured notes 'BBB-', two notches higher than the IDR.
In addition, all of QVC's existing and future secured debt is
secured by QVC's stock and guaranteed by QVC's material domestic
subsidiaries, none of which have any material debt. Finally, QVC's
secured debt is structurally senior to Liberty's unsecured debt.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Qurate, the largest global provider of television retailing and a
leading multimedia retailer, is well positioned within the retail
sector given its loyal customer base, with nearly 90% of sales
generated by repeat and reactivated customers and an increasing
global ecommerce presence, which generated $8.9 billion of net
revenues for fiscal 2020. It offers a wide variety of consumer
products, marketed and sold primarily by merchandise-focused
televised shopping programs distributed to more than 218 million
households daily, and internet and mobile applications.

Kohl's Corporation's ratings (BBB-/Stable) reflect its position as
the second largest department store in the U.S. and its
well-developed omnichannel strategies, with digital sales expected
to contribute to approximately 35% of revenues going forward.
Nordstrom's ratings (BBB-/Negative) reflect its historically good
market position in the apparel, footwear, and accessories space,
with its differentiated merchandise and high level of customer
service enabling the company to enjoy strong customer loyalty.
However, the Negative Outlook reflects concerns that recent
pre-pandemic operating challenges could suggest some combination of
execution shortfalls and increased susceptibility to secular
headwinds in the department store space, which could limit the
company's ability to return revenue and profitability close to
pre-pandemic levels.

Dillard's ratings (BB+/Positive) reflect its improving topline
trajectory and strong cost reduction along with lower operating
profitability, geographical concentration and low ecommerce
penetration relative to its larger department store peers. The
ratings also consider Dillard's strong liquidity, FCF and minimal
debt maturities. Macy's ratings (BB+/Stable) reflect its improving
topline trajectory and strong cost reduction and its position as
the largest department store chain in the U.S. Results in recent
years have been pressured given long-term weak mall traffic trends
and heightened competition from alternate channels.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Mid-single single digit revenue growth in 2021 due to
    difficult 2H21 comps as the pandemic's effects cycle off and
    supply chain issues continue to weigh on growth;

-- Low single digit revenue growth thereafter;

-- Approximately 130 bp of margin improvement by 2023 due
    primarily to the full realization of Fitch-adjusted run rate
    synergies, net of the cost to achieve them;

-- Capital intensity slowly declines to 2.1% by 2024 as Qurate
    completes the necessary capital investments to consolidate HSN
    and grow the business;

-- FCF generation grows from $810 million in 2020 to $1.3 billion
    in 2024 due primarily to the realization of cost synergies;

-- Shareholder returns return to historical levels funded with a
    mix of FCF and debt issuance at QVC, with another special
    dividend occurring in 2022;

-- Over the rating horizon, Qurate's pro forma lease adjusted
    debt to operating EBITDAR remains around 3.5x while QVC's
    total debt with equity credit to operating EBITDA remains in
    the low-2.0s.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Qurate sustaining operating improvement, including positive
    revenue and EBITDA margin improvement, while QVC's total debt
    with equity credit to EBITDA remains below 2.0x and Liberty's
    total adjusted debt to EBITDAR remains below 3.25x;

-- If Liberty were to manage to more conservative leverage
    targets.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- If financial policy changes, including more aggressive
    leverage targets or weakened bondholder protection;

-- If there are unexpected revenue declines in excess of 10% that
    materially drive declines in EBITDA and FCF, and result in
    Liberty's total adjusted debt to EBITDAR exceeding 3.75x
    and/or QVC's leverage exceeding 2.5x in the absence of a
    credible plan to reduce leverage.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: Fitch believes QVC's liquidity will be
sufficient to support operations and its expansion into other
markets. Fitch expects near-term debt repayment, acquisitions and
share buybacks to be a primary use of FCF. Fitch expects Qurate to
generate FCF of approximately $1 billion annually over the rating
horizon. Fitch recognizes that in the event of a liquidity strain
at Liberty, QVC could provide funding to support debt service via
intercompany loans. Qurate's consolidated liquidity as of June 30,
2021 included $950 million in readily available cash and $2.85
billion available under QVC's $2.95 billion revolving credit
facility due in December 2023.

QVC's maturities are manageable, with the next maturities occurring
in 2023 ($750 million) and 2024 ($600 million) of QVC secured notes
mature. Qurate also lists near-term maturities that are only
classified as near term because Liberty does not own the underlying
shares needed to redeem the debentures. However, Liberty has no
intention or requirement to redeem them in the near term, and
maturities range from 2029 to 2046.

ISSUER PROFILE

Qurate Retail, Inc. is a global leader in video and e-commerce
across multiple linear, streaming and online platforms including
QVC, HSN, Zulily, and its Cornerstone titles. It reaches
approximately 218 million homes worldwide and has approximately 18
million customers.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Qurate Retail, Inc. has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Group
Structure due to complexity and related-party transactions, which
has a negative impact on the credit profile, and is relevant to the
rating in conjunction with other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


REDWOOD EMPIRE: May Use Cash Collateral Thru Nov 18
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Eddward P. Ballinger Jr.  of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona has authorized Redwood Empire Lodging, LP
to use cash collateral to pay postpetition expenses, pursuant to
the budget during the second interim period from September 22
through and including November 18, 2021.

The Court ruled that the Debtor will not make any payment to any
professional employed under Bankruptcy Code section 327 before
interim or final (as applicable) approval of such professionalā€™s
application for payment of such fees and costs.  The Debtor,
however, may pay for ordinary course accounting fees to Wyatt
Whitchurch & Anderson as set forth in the operating budgets.

In addition to the replacement liens granted to the Debtor's
Lenders under the First Interim Order, the Lenders are granted as
adequate protection, valid and perfected security interests in the
Debtor's postpetition assets of the same type and to the same
extent and priority (if any) as existed prior to the Petition
Date.

During the pendency of the third interim order, the Debtor will
maintain insurance on the Lenders' physical collateral and will
provide proof of insurance to its secured creditors in addition to
what the Debtor provided on June 25, 2021 promptly following a
written request.

These events constitute an "Event of Default:"

     a. The Debtor will be in breach of its agreements or
undertakings, provided that with respect to any report that any
Lender claims has not been provided, the Lender will provide
written notice to the Debtor relating to such report and the Debtor
will have 2 business days to cure;

     b. The Debtor will furnish or knowingly make any false,
inaccurate, or incomplete representation, warranty, certificate,
report or summary in connection with or under the Order;

     c. the appointment of a trustee in the Debtor's Bankruptcy
Case;

     d. the dismissal of Debtor's Bankruptcy Case;

     e. except as permitted, the use of Cash Collateral under
Bankruptcy Code section 363(c) without Lenders' prior written
consent;

     f. Best Western International, Inc. or any of its affiliates
obtains a final order granting relief from the automatic stay
applicable under Bankruptcy Code section 362 in the Debtor's
Bankruptcy Case to exercise any of their rights under or terminate
the membership agreements between Best Western and Debtor (and then
cash collateral will cease as to the affected Hotel);

     g. any person or entity obtains a final order granting relief
from the automatic stay with respect to the Lendersā€™ collateral
(and then cash collateral will cease as to the affected Hotel);

     h. a further interim order approving the Debtor's use of Cash
Collateral is not entered by the Court on or the expiration of the
Second Interim Period;

     i. the Debtor's Bankruptcy Case is converted to a case under
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code;

     j. the Debtor will sell either of its Hotels without either
(i) the applicable secured creditorā€™s written consent (and in its
sole and absolute discretion), or (ii) order of the Court after
notice and a hearing;

     k. the Debtor's filing of a motion to abandon its interest in
either of the Hotels;

     l. the Debtor's failure to maintain insurance in amounts and
types as may be required under applicable loan and security
documents, subject to 10 business days written notice and
opportunity to cure; or

     m. the Debtor's failure to cause all applicable sales and bed
taxes to be paid on or before their due dates, or the Debtor's
failure to provide Lenders with evidence thereof subject to five
business days written notice from Lender and opportunity to cure.

The Court has not determined if or to what extent the Lenders hold
valid security interests in the Cash Collateral or any other
collateral. In this regard, the Debtor fully reserves all of its
rights to challenge any of the security interests that may be
asserted by the Lenders, and the Lenders fully reserve all of their
rights to assert alleged claims and liens in the Cash Collateral
(and any other property). Debtor has confirmed the authenticity of
Pacific Premier's, Poppy's, and S&K's loan documents, which
confirmation will be binding on the Debtor.

The next hearing on the matter is scheduled for November 18 at 10
a.m.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3a12852 from
PacerMonitor.com.

                 About Redwood Empire Lodging, LP

Redwood Empire Lodging, LP owns and operates two hotels: the Best
Western Plus located at 208 N Lake Powell Boulevard, Page, Arizona
86040, and the Best Western Sonoma Winegrower's Inn, located at
6500 Redwood Drive, Rohnert Park, California 94928.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 21-04678) on June 16,
2021. In the petition signed by Debra Heckert, member, the Debtor
disclosed up to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Eddward P. Ballinger Jr. is assigned to the case.

Isaac M. Gabriel, Esq., at Quarles & Brady LLP is the Debtor's
counsel.



ROARK & ASSOCIATES: Seeks Approval to Hire Bankruptcy Attorneys
---------------------------------------------------------------
Roark & Associates, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California to employ Eric
Gravel, Esq., and William McLaughlin, Esq., to serve as attorneys
in its Chapter 11 case.

The attorneys will render these services:

     (a) prepare and file all documents necessary for the
prosecution of the Debtor's reorganization;

     (b) appear at the initial debtor interview with the Office of
the U.S. Trustee and the first meeting of creditors;

     (c) prepare a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization
and appear at proceedings related to the confirmation of the plan;
and

     (e) assist the Debtor in the preparation and filing of monthly
operating reports prior to confirmation and quarterly reports
post-confirmation as required.

Both attorneys will charge $400 per hour for their services.  They
received a retainer in the amount of $17,000.

As disclosed in court filings, Mr. Gavel and Mr. McLaughlin are
"disinterested persons" as that phrase is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The attorneys can be reached at:

     Eric J. Gravel, Esq.
     1390 Market Street, Suite 200
     San Francisco, CA 94102
     Telephone: (415) 767-3880
     Email: ctnotices@gmail.com

     -- and --

     William F. McLaughlin, Esq.
     1305 Franklin Street, Suite 311   
     Oakland, CA 94612
     Telephone: (510) 839-4456
     Email: MCL551@AOL.COM

                     About Roark & Associates

Roark & Associates, LLC filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 21-30614) on Sept. 1, 2021, listing as
much as $50,000 in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Dennis
Montali oversees the case.  Eric J. Gravel, Esq., and William F.
McLaughlin, Esq., serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy attorneys.


ROCHELLE HOLDINGS: Ordered to Revise Plan & Disclosures by Oct. 8
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Rochelle Holdings XIII, LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida a Disclosure Statement and
Plan of Reorganization. On October 4, 2021, Judge Lori V. Vaughan
ordered that:

     * The Debtor is directed to file an amended disclosure
statement and plan by October 8, 2021.

     * The hearing is continued to Nov. 17, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. in
Courtroom C, Sixth Floor, of the United States Bankruptcy Court,
400 West Washington Street, Orlando, Florida 32801.

     * HMG Venture Partner, LLC and PM S-1 REO, LLC ("HMG/PMS"), J
& R Hewitt Investments Limited Partnership ("Hewitt Investments"),
and Debtor are directed to file briefs addressing HMG/PMS and
Hewitt Investments' respective standing in this case on or before
November 10, 2021.

A copy of the order dated Oct. 4, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/2YkFsdi from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

      Lawrence M. Kosto, Esq.
      Kosto & Rotella, P.A.
      619 East Washington Street
      Orlando, FL 32801
      Telephone: (407) 425-3456
      Facsimile: (407) 423-9002

                   About Rochelle Holdings XIII

Longwood, Fla.-based Rochelle Holdings XIII, LLC sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
21-03216) on July 15, 2021, disclosing total assets of $85 million
and total liabilities of $29.06 million.  Matthew R. Hill, managing
member of Rochelle Holdings, signed the petition.  Judge Lori V.
Vaughan oversees the case.  Kosto & Rotella, PA serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


SAMURAI MARTIAL: Unsecured Creditors Will Get $45K in 60 Months
---------------------------------------------------------------
Samurai Martial Sports, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas a Disclosure Statement and Plan
of Reorganization for Small Business dated September 30, 2021.

Samurai is a Texas corporation that was established in 2006 and is
wholly owned 50% each by Ihab Ahmed and Wafa Abuleel. Ahmed is the
president of the company.  Samurai owns and operates a sports
complex and physical fitness facility located at 12500 Oxford Park
Drive, Houston, Texas 77082 (the "Property").

Samurai has a long history as a profitable business, but all of its
operations ceased with the economic shut-down for COVID-19. Samurai
was unable to keep its debts current throughout the shut down. Now
that COVID-19 has subsided in part and the economic shut-down has
been lifted, Samurai's business has returned, but it filed this
bankruptcy case in order to obtain time to cure its defaults.

This Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay Samurai's creditors
primarily from future income generated by the business. Now that
the economic shut-down has been lifted, Samurai believes that it
will be able to operate its business sufficiently profitably to
fund the Plan.

Non-priority unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will
receive distributions valued at the full amount of their allowed
claim. This Plan also provides for the payment of administrative
and priority claims.

The Plan will treat claims as follows:

     * Class 1 consists of the claim of Harris County et al. Harris
County filed a proof of claim for $25,657.32. Of this amount,
$12,098.37 is for estimated ad valorem property taxes for the real
property for 2021 tax year. Amounts owed for personal property ad
valorem taxes for 2021 and remaining real estate ad valorem taxes
will be paid over 48 months from the effective date of the plan to
the Class 2 creditor except to the extent that Samurai successfully
disputes any such amount under non-bankruptcy law. Amounts will
also be paid interest at an interest rate of 12% per annum. The
claim of Harris County shall be fully paid on or before July 2,
2026.

     * Class 2 consists of the claim of the City of Houston. The
City of Houston filed a proof of claim for $10,614. The claim is
for estimated ad valorem property taxes for the real property for
2021 tax year. On or before January 31, 2022, BankUnited will pay
from the escrow amounts approximately one-half of the amounts due
for the real estate ad valorem taxes for 2021 for Class 2; provided
that BankUnited shall only be required to pay in total for all ad
valorem taxes for 2021 the escrow amounts for ad valorem taxes for
the Debtor. The claim of the City of Houston shall be fully paid on
or before July 2, 2026.

     * Class 3 consists of the claim of Alief Independent School
District. Alief Independent School District filed a proof of claim
for $22,760.44. On or before January 31, 2022, BankUnited will pay
from the escrow amounts approximately one-half of the amounts due
for the real estate ad valorem taxes for 2021 for Class 3; provided
that BankUnited shall only be required to pay in total for all ad
valorem taxes for 2021 the escrow amounts for ad valorem taxes for
the Debtor. The claim of Alief Independent School District shall be
fully paid on or before July 2, 2026.

     * Class 4 consists of the claim of Texas Workforce Commission.
Samurai will pay $1,475.93 to Class 4, plus postpetition interest
accruing on this amount at a rate of 3.75% per year from the
petition date until the amount is paid in full. Samurai will pay
this amount in 36 equal monthly payments, beginning on the fifth
day of the first full calendar month after the effective date of
the Plan.

     * Class 5 consists of the claim of LiftFund. Samurai will pay
$20,000.00 to Class 5, plus postpetition interest accruing on this
amount at a rate of 5.5% per year from the petition date until the
amount is paid in full. Samurai will pay this amount in 60 equal
monthly payments beginning on the fifth day of the first full
calendar month after the effective date of the Plan.

     * Class 6 consists of the claim of BankUnited. Samurai will
pay the ongoing principal and interest payments to BankUnited of
$13,375. Samurai will pay the arrearage amounts to BankUnited over
60 months in addition to the ongoing principal and interest
payments. Further, Samurai will pay an ad valorem tax escrow to
BankUnited of $3,250 per month, subject to adjustments for ad
valorem tax increases.

     * Class 7 consists of the claim of Texas Citizens Bank. The
claim of Texas Citizens Bank is classified for purposes of this
plan as an unsecured claim and shall be paid in Class 9. The lien
and deed of trust of Texas Citizens Bank shall be deemed released,
terminated and discharged upon confirmation of this plan. Samurai
may file a release and discharge of the deed of trust lien, and
other encumbrances of Texas Citizens Bank upon the effective date
of plan confirmation.

     * Class 8 consists of Priority Claim of the Internal Revenue
Service. The priority claim of the Internal Revenue Service
estimated at $40,338.24 over approximately 55 months at 3% interest
such that the total priority claim of the Internal Revenue Service
shall be fully paid on or before July 2, 2026.

     * Class 9 consists of NonPriority Unsecured Creditors. Samurai
will pay $45,000 to the creditors with claims in Class 9 in 60
monthly payments, beginning on the fifth day of the first full
calendar month after the effective date of the Plan. Such amount
will be in full satisfaction of the claims in Class 9.

     * Class 10 consists of Equity Security Holders. The class 10
creditor will retain his stock interests in the Debtor subject to
the terms of this plan.

Samurai expects to fund the Plan with future income generated by
its sports and fitness programs, which were profitable before the
economic shut-down for COVID-19 and which Samurai expects to be
profitable once again now that the economic shut-down has ended.
Except for any items of property specifically surrendered according
to the terms of the Plan, Samurai will retain the property of the
bankruptcy estate. Ihab Ahmed will remain president of the
reorganized Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated September 30,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3FjEbEk from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for the Debtor:

     Reese Baker, Esq.
     Baker & Associates
     950 Echo Lane, Ste 300
     Houston, TX 77024
     Tel: (713) 979-2279

                 About Samurai Martial Sports Inc.

Samurai Martial Sports, Inc., is a Houston-based company that
operates a sports complex, camps, after school care and related
matters.

Samurai Martial Sports filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 21-32250) on July 2, 2021, listing as
much as $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  Ihab Ahmed,
president of Samurai Martial Sports, signed the petition.  

Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez oversees the case.

Reese Baker, Esq., at Baker & Associates and Norris & Associates
serve as the Debtor's legal counsel and accountant, respectively.


SILGAN HOLDINGS: Fitch's 'BB+' IDR Removed From UCO Status
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Removes Silgan Holdings Inc.'s 'BB+' Long-Term Issuer Default
Rating (IDR) from Under Criteria Observation (UCO).

Fitch also removes from UCO Silgan's Senior 1st Lien Secured U.S.
and Canadian Revolving and Term Loan Facilities at 'BBB-'/'RR1',
senior unsecured USD and euro-denominated notes at' BB+'/'RR4', and
the 'BBB-'/'RR1' ratings of the senior secured notes.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The removal from UCO of the senior secured and unsecured
instruments reflects Fitch's application of the agency's updated
Corporates Recovery Ratings and Instrument Ratings Criteria. The
ratings were placed on UCO following the publication of the updated
criteria on April 9, 2021.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Recovery Ratings Criteria Update: The RR and instrument rating for
Silgan's revolving credit are based on Fitch's rating grid for
issuers with 'BB' category IDRs. Silgan's senior secured ratings
are viewed as a category 1 first-lien, which translates into a
one-notch uplift from the IDR of 'BB+' with a 'RR1'. Silgan's USD
and Euro unsecured bonds are viewed as 'RR4', with a notching
equivalent to the 'BB+' IDR.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Demonstrated commitment toward maintaining a Total Debt with
    Equity Credit/Operating EBITDA below 3.5x on a sustained
    basis, supported by a clear and credible financial policy;

-- Credit conscious implementation of the company's M&A strategy
    while maintaining or enhancing cash flow consistency;

-- Transition to a less encumbered balance sheet.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Total Debt with Equity Credit/Operating EBITDA above 4.0x on a
    sustained basis, or a weakening of existing leverage
    targeting;

-- A debt funded acquisition which is not accommodated within
    existing financial policies, does not have a clear
    deleveraging path within 24 months, or which materially
    changes the predictability of cash flows.

-- A change in capital allocation policies which prioritizes
    shareholder returns over deleveraging.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

ISSUER PROFILE

Silgan Holdings Inc. (Silgan) is a leading supplier of rigid
packaging for a range of food and consumer products with EBITDA of
approximately $800 million on revenue of over $5 billion. The
company generates about 70% of revenues in North America and the
remaining 20% in Europe, with the balance predominately in Latin
America.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch has made no material adjustments that are not disclosed
within the company's public filings.

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


SK FOODS: California Court Dismisses Four in One Suit
-----------------------------------------------------
Four in One Company, Inc., Bruce Foods Corporation, Cliffstar
Corporation and Diversified Foods & Seasonings, Inc. are food
product manufacturers that purchased processed tomato products from
SK Foods L.P., Ingomar Packing Company, Los Gatos Tomato Products,
Scott Salyer, Stuart Woolf and Greg Pruett.  The Plaintiffs moved
for cy pres distribution of the remaining class funds, $8,766.85,
to the Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies at Loyola
University Chicago School of Law (ICAS/Loyola) and dismissal of the
action.  The Defendants did not file an opposition, and the Court
submitted the matter without a hearing.

Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of California, issued an
order dated Sept. 30, 2021, granting the motions as follows:

   (1) The Court grants the disbursement of the remaining class
funds in the amount of $8,766.85 to the appropriate cy pres
designee, the ICAS/Loyola.

   (2) The Court dismisses on the merits and with prejudice the
remaining causes of action against SK Foods, L.P. and Scott
Salyer.

The Court found that ICAS/Loyola's advocacy efforts align with the
nature of the plaintiffs' lawsuit and the consumer protection
objectives of the Sherman Act.  The Plaintiffs propose ICAS/Loyola
as cy pres designee "because of its work on behalf of consumers in
the area of antitrust law to protect the rights of individuals from
the types of predatory behavior underlying the lawsuit."
ICAS/Loyola is a "non-sectarian charitable organization" and
"non-partisan, independent academic center that advocates for a
more just, competitive, and consumer-friendly economy."

Silent class members' interests will reasonably be benefitted by
the distribution to ICAS/Loyola, the Court said.  The Plaintiffs
argue that ICAS/Loyola reflects the interests of the silent class
members because "it has a nationwide reach sufficient to justify
receipt of the cy pres award."  The Court agreed.  ICAS/Loyola
works on behalf of people such as the "[c]lass members in this
case, who were consumers of commodities that were the subject of
price-fixing agreements subject to antitrust liability."
University programs may be appropriate designees when the focus of
the program aligns with the interests of a nationwide class.
Likewise, ICAS/Loyola's research on creating a more just economy
will benefit the silent, nationwide class impacted by alleged price
fixing.  Therefore, the Court held, the organization is an
appropriate cy pres designee due to the nexus between the class
interests and the designee's interest.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at https://is.gd/sD5Hxs
from Leagle.com.

The cases are Four In One Company, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SK
Foods, L.P., et al. Defendants. Diversified Foods and Seasoning,
Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SK Foods, L.P., et al. Defendants.
Bruce Foods Corporation., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SK Foods, L.P., et
al. Defendants Cliffstar Corporation., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SK
Foods, L.P., et al. Defendants, Nos. 2:08-cv-3017 KJM JDP,
2:08-cv-03074-KJM-JDP, 2:09-cv-00027-KJM-JDP, 2:09-cv-00442 KJM JDP
(E.D. Cal.).

                         About SK Foods

SK Foods LP ran a tomato processing facility.  It filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection after being dropped by its lending group.
Creditors filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition against SK Foods
LP and affiliate RHM Supply/ Specialty Foods Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.
Case No. 09-29161) on May 8, 2009.  SK Foods had said it was
preparing to file a voluntary Chapter 11 petition when the
creditors initiated the involuntary case.  The Company later put
itself into Chapter 11 and Bradley D. Sharp was appointed as
Chapter 11 trustee.  The Debtors were authorized on June 26, 2009,
to sell the business for $39 million cash to a U.S. arm of
Singapore food processor Olam International Ltd.  The replacement
cost for the assets is $139 million, according to Olam. In February
2010, a federal grand jury returned a seven-count indictment
charging Frederick Scott Salyer, former owner and CEO of SK Foods,
with violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act, in connection with his direction of various
schemes to defraud SK Foods' corporate customers through bribery
and food misbranding and adulteration, and with wire fraud and
obstruction of justice.

Salyer supporters launched a Web site which can be accessed from
two addresses: http://www.operationrottentomato.com/and
http://www.scott-salyer.com/


SOUTH COAST BEHAVIORAL: Nov. 22 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Sept. 29, 2021, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California held a disclosure statement hearing for
Debtor South Coast Behavioral Health, Inc. On October 4, 2021,
Judge Mark S. Wallace approved the Disclosure Statement and ordered
that:

     * Nov. 5, 2021, is fixed as the last day to submit Ballots and
objections to plan confirmation.

     * Nov. 12, 2021, is fixed as the last day for Debtor to file
replies to objections.

     * Nov. 22, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. is the plan confirmation
hearing.

A copy of the order dated October 4, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3FkNuUv from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                About South Coast Behavioral Health

South Coast Behavioral Health, Inc., is a healthcare company that
specializes in the in-patient and outpatient treatment of addicts,
alcoholics, and persons dealing with mental health issues.  It
offers a clinically supervised residential sub-acute detox
services, therapeutic and residential treatment centers, intensive
outpatient treatment services, and partial hospitalization
programs.  On the Web https://www.scbh.com/

South Coast Behavioral Health sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12375) on June
20, 2019.  At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range. Judge Mark S. Wallace oversees the case.

The Debtor has tapped Nicastro & Associates, P.C., as its
bankruptcy counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors in Debtor's case.  The committee tapped Weiland Golden
Goodrich LLP as its legal counsel, and Bryars Tolleson Spires +
Whitton LLP as its financial advisor.

On Feb. 27, 2020, the U.S. Trustee appointed Thomas Casey as the
Debtor's Chapter 11 trustee.  Mr. Casey has tapped Ringstad &
Sanders LLP as his bankruptcy counsel; Nicastro & Associates, PC as
special counsel; and Joseph S. Yung & Co. as tax accountant.


STATERA BIOPHARMA: Turner Stone Replaces Meaden & Moore as Auditor
------------------------------------------------------------------
The audit committee of Statera BioPharma, Inc.'s board of directors
approved the engagement of Turner, Stone & Company, LLP as the
company's independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2021, subject to completion of the
firm's standard client acceptance process and execution of an
engagement letter, and dismissed Meaden & Moore as the company's
independent registered public accounting firm.

The reports of M&M on the company's consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2020 did not contain
an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and was not qualified
or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting
principles. M&M's report on the company's consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2019 did not contain
an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion but contained a
modified opinion, as it included an explanatory paragraph
describing the net capital deficiency that raised substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Statera BioPharma stated that during the years ended Dec. 31, 2020
and 2019 and the subsequent interim period through Sept. 28, 2021:
(i) the company had no disagreements (as defined in Item
304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) with
M&M on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which
disagreements, if not resolved to M&M's satisfaction, would have
caused M&M to make reference thereto in its reports on the
company's financial statements for such years, and (ii) there were
no "reportable events," as that term is defined in Item
304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, other than with respect to the
company's previously reported determination that as of Dec. 31,
2019, the company's internal control over financial reporting was
not effective.

During the years ended Dec. 31, 2020 and 2019 and the subsequent
interim period through Sept. 28, 2021, neither Statera BioPharma
nor anyone acting on the company's behalf, consulted Turner Stone
regarding: (i) the application of accounting principles to a
specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of
audit opinion that might be rendered on the company's financial
statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was
provided to the company that Turner Stone concluded was an
important factor considered by the company in reaching a decision
as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, or
(ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement as
defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related
instructions or a "reportable event" described in Item 304(a)(1)(v)
of Regulation S-K.

                           About Statera

Statera Biopharma, Inc. (formerly known as Cytocom, Inc. and
Cleveland Biolabs) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company
developing novel immunotherapies targeting autoimmune,
neutropenia/anemia, emerging viruses and cancers based on a
proprietary platform designed to rebalance the body's immune system
and restore homeostasis.

Cleveland Biolabs reported a net loss of $2.44 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.69 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2021, the Company had
$13.83 million in total assets, $300,623 in total liabilities, and
$13.53 million in total stockholders' equity.


TALI CORP: Unsecured Creditors to Get Share of Income for 5 Years
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Tali Corp. d/b/a/ bkr, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California a Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor's bankruptcy filing was precipitated by the COVID-19
pandemic. Despite the COVID pandemic, the Debtor saw an increase in
internet sales in 2020, though not enough to offset the losses
through other channels. The unexpected decline in revenue
ultimately led to cash flow difficulties, and the Debtor's decision
to file for bankruptcy.

As of Oct. 1, 2021, the Debtor estimates that it will have
approximately $42,000 of cash on hand.  As of Oct. 1, 2021, Debtor
estimates that it will have accounts receivable of approximately
$122,000, 85% of which is estimated to be collectable, for a total
recovery on accounts receivable of $103,700.

Payments due under the Plan will be made from cash on hand as of
the Effective Date of the Plan and future revenues generated by the
reorganized Debtor.  General unsecured creditors with allowed
claims will receive a pro rata portion of the greater of (i) a fund
totaling 5% of actual Net Revenue that Debtor earns above
$4,500,000 per year in each of the 5 years after the Effective Date
of the Plan, and (ii) a fund totaling 35% of Debtor s actual Net
Income that exceeds $175,000.00/year in each of the 5 years after
the Effective Date of the Plan.

Taxes will be paid in full in monthly payments over 3 years.
Administrative claims will be paid in full in monthly payments over
18 months or 3 years depending on the claim. Priority wage
claimants, to the extent that the employee remains an employee of
Debtor and that the claim is based on unused vacation days, will
retain the right to use that vacation pay in the ordinary course of
reorganized Debtor's business.  Priority wage claimants, to the
extent that they are no longer employed by Debtor or that their
claims are based on unpaid wages, will be paid in full in monthly
payments over 3 years.

Class 1A consists of the claim of City National Bank. Debtor will
pay the secured claim in full with interest from the Effective Date
of the Plan through 77 monthly payments. Payments will be due on
the 1st day of the month, starting on the Effective Date. The cure
provisions in the Plan apply to this class. Creditors in these
classes shall retain their interest in the collateral until Debtor
makes all payments on the allowed secured claim specified in the
Plan.

Allowed claims of general unsecured creditors shall be paid as
follows: The balance of the Debtor's projected disposable income
for 3 years after payment of secured, administrative, and priority
claims, is $0. Creditors will receive a pro rata portion of the
greater of (i) a fund totaling 5% of actual Net Revenue that Debtor
earns above $4,500,000 per year in each of the 5 years after the
Effective Date of the Plan, and (ii) a fund totaling 35% of Debtor
s actual Net Income that exceeds $175,000 per year in each of the 5
years after the Effective Date of the Plan.

Both scenarios will be evaluated using the year end income tax
return for each year as filed. Payments will be distributed one
month after the annual tax return for each year is filed. In
addition, should the reorganized Debtor (i) choose to prosecute the
lawsuits or (ii) settle the lawsuits prior to the commencement of
litigation, general unsecured creditors would receive a prorata
portion of 50% of any net recovery.  If at the end of 5 years after
the Effective Date of the Plan general unsecured creditors with
allowed claims have not received any payments, they shall be
entitled to a pro rata portion of $10,000.

All current interest holders will retain their percentage equity
membership in the Debtor that they held as of the Petition Date.
Post-confirmation, the Debtor will continue to be managed by Adam
Winter and Tal Winter.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated Sept. 30,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3D5CTLe from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for the Debtor:

     Jeffrey I. Golden, Esq.
     Reem J. Bello, Esq.
     Sonja M. Hourany, Esq.
     Weiland Golden Goodrich LLP
     650 Town Center Drive, Suite 600
     Costa Mesa, CA 92626
     Telephone: (714) 966-1000
     Facsimile: (714) 966-1002
     Email: jgolden@wgllp.com
            rbello@wgllp.com
            shourany@wgllp.com

                          About Tali Corp.

Tali Corp. d/b/a bkr manufactures glass and glass products. Tali
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 21-30254) on April 1, 2021.  In the
petition signed by Adam Winter, chief operating officer, the Debtor
disclosed up to $50,000 in assets and up to $10 million in
liabilities.

Judge Dennis Montali oversees the case.

Jeffrey I. Golden, Esq., is the Debtor's counsel.


TENRGYS LLC: Nov. 9 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------
On Oct. 1, 2021, Tenrgys, LLC and its Debtor Affiliates filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
a Disclosure Statement and Joint Plan. On October 4, 2021, Judge
Jamie A. Wilson ordered that:

     * Nov. 9, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Mississippi, Bankruptcy Courtroom 4C, 501
East Court Street, Jackson, Mississippi, is the hearing to consider
the approval of the disclosure statement.

     * Nov. 1, 2021, is fixed as the last day for filing and
serving written objections to the disclosure statement.

A copy of the order dated October 4, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3moDYHv from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.  

                        About Tenrgys LLC

Tenrgys, LLC operates as an oil and gas exploration and production
company.  It is headquartered in Ridgeland, Miss.

Tenrgys and its affiliates filed their voluntary petitions for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Lead Case No. 21-01515) on
Sept. 17, 2021, listing as much as $500 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Richard H. Mills, Jr., manager, signed the
petitions.

Judge Jamie A. Wilson oversees the cases.

Copeland, Cook, Taylor & Bush, P.A. and FTI Consulting, Inc. serve
as the Debtors' legal counsel and financial advisor, respectively.


TERRAFORM POWER: Fitch Affirms 'BB-' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed TerraForm Power Operating LLC's (TERPO)
'BB-' Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR). The Rating Outlook is
Stable. Fitch has downgraded TERPO's senior unsecured rating to
'BB-'/'RR4' from 'BB'/'RR2' to reflect the application of the
updated Corporates Recovery Ratings and Instrument Ratings
Criteria.

TERPO's IDR is supported by long-term contracted or regulated cash
flows from a diversified renewables portfolio. Resource variability
is a key risk offset by cost discipline. TERPO's IDR incorporates
Fitch's expectation that it will fund cash distributions in a
credit-supportive manner. Holdco-only FFO leverage is expected to
range from mid-to high-5x. Private ownership is beneficial but
impairs transparency.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Contracted and Regulated Portfolio: TERPO owns and operates 4.2GW
of diversified wind and solar assets located primarily in the U.S.
and Spain. Approximately 59% of cash flows are long-term contracted
with over 90% investment-grade off-takers, and 35% is regulated
under a fixed return-on-investment regime in Spain. TERPO's power
purchase contracts have a 12-year average remaining life, shorter
than peers.

Performance to Improve: Despite lower wind resources and outages,
financial performance in 2021 overall is expected to improve,
primarily due to strong power prices in Spain, cost savings and
project completion. Spain wholesale power prices have more than
doubled compared to a year ago. Mt. Signal solar project will be
transitioned to a fully-wrapped OM agreement with SMA solar which
should improve margin. The repowering of 160MW wind facilities in
New York will add 100GWh generation per year and incremental cash
flow of $5 million year.

Texas Storm Impact Manageable: In February 2021, Texas' extreme
cold weather resulted in record high wholesale power prices. TERPO
operates about 400MW gross capacity in Texas (216MW net of minority
partner interest). The Rattlesnake and South Plains facilities are
the only two facilities that have fixed-volume energy hedges. They
are required to purchase power at market price when generation was
below a certain level. Rattlesnake was offline for 10 days. South
Plains was operational but generation was impaired. Cost of
operations from the event was $113 million including power purchase
cost offset by $52 million of higher average market price realized
at partially operational wind farm in Texas. TERPO restructured the
terms of each partnership agreement that gives TERPO priority in
distribution during the term of a new preferred equity investment.
TERPO expects to have a net benefit for the forecast period as a
result.

Organic and Low Growth: Fitch expects TERPO to shift toward an
organic and low growth model. Future growth will come from
redevelopments (including repowering), distributed generation
expansions, battery storage, behind-the-meter efficiency products.
The repowering of the 160MW Cohocton and Steel Winds facilities in
New York are expected to reach commercial operations by the end of
the year.

Increasing Distribution: Distributions have increased since the end
of 2020. In affirming TERPO's ratings, Fitch assumes that it will
fund the distributions in a credit supportive manner. In 2020,
distribution totaled $315 million compared with $179 million in
2019. It was partly funded by proceeds from selling a 49.9%
minority stake in an 836MW North American wind portfolio in October
2020. For the first half of 2021, TERPO distributed $411 million
including $286 million to Terraform Power LLC. It was funded by a
revolver draw of $290 million, which is expected to be repaid by
project upfinancing. Upfinancing will result in lower growth in
distributable cash flow, offset by maintaining or reducing holdco
debt to reach a target leverage ratio.

Service Contracts Improve Margin: TERPO expects wind O&M to achieve
approximately $20 million run-rate savings following the
implementation of Full-Service Agreement (FSA) with GE on the 1.6
GW North American wind fleet. TERPO received $6 million FSA
guarantee payment in 2020. TERPO also extended the South Plains
wind contract with existing O&M provider adding $2 million savings.
TERPO executed Long-term Service Agreements (LTSA) for European
wind which could achieve $4 million savings. TERPO signed LTSA for
its 988 MW North America solar fleet with SMA solar (excluding
Arcadia) which could save $5 million. Arcadia has been signed LTSA
with QE Solar in July which could save $1 million.

Private Ownership Largely Positive: Private ownership by Brookfield
Renewable Partners (BEP, BBB+/Stable) and Brookfield affiliates
removed $4 million administrative costs associated with a publicly
listed company and the need to pay management fees which was $27
million in 2019. The 5%-8% growth target and 80%-85% dividend
payout ratio are eliminated. However, a private ownership is
usually less transparent.

Credit Metrics: Fitch calculates TERPO's credit metrics on a
deconsolidated basis as its operating assets are largely financed
with nonrecourse debt. TERPO's 2020 holdco-only FFO leverage ratio
was approximately 5.9x. In the next three years, Fitch projects
that holdco-only FFO leverage will be in the mid to high 5.0x.

Parent Sub Linkage: Fitch rates TERPO on a standalone basis. Fitch
views TERPO as an affiliate of BEP and BEP's support is typical of
a financial sponsor or investment manager, instead of a 'parent'.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

TERPO's ratings are assigned based on a deconsolidated approach.
TERPO's subsidiaries are project subsidiaries that have been
largely funded by nonrecourse debt. Fitch applies similar approach
to NextEra Energy Partners (NEP; BB+/Stable) and Atlantica
Sustainable Infrastructure plc (AY; BB+/Stable), both of which own
and operate portfolios of nonrecourse projects.

TERPO is similar in terms of generation capacity to NEP but is
larger than AY. TERPO's long-term contracted fleet has a remaining
contract life of 12 years, lower than NEP's 15 years and AY's 17
years. NEP and AY are publicly traded yieldcos and are targeting
12%-15% and 8%-10% distribution growth, respectively. TERPO has
been taken private and is no longer subject to public growth
targets and will execute a low-growth strategy. AY's renewable
portfolio benefits from a large proportion of solar generation
assets (63%) that exhibit less resource variability, versus NEP's
14% and TERPO's 43%. Fitch considers NEP better positioned than
TERPO owing to NEP's primary presence in the U.S., stronger credit
metrics and its association with NextEra Energy Inc. (A-/Stable).
Similar to AY, TERPO is exposed to Spanish regulatory
uncertainties. TERPO's credit metrics are weaker than those of AY,
but TERPO's ownership by BEP is stronger than AY, providing
stability and expertise in executing its business strategies.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Wind O&M to achieve about $20 million in run-rate savings
    following the implementation of the FSA with GE that wraps O&M
    and major maintenance and guarantees production on a MWh
    basis;

-- Repowering of 160MW of wind facilities in NY to reach COD at
    the end of 2021;

-- Certain amount of debt reduction and refinancing are assumed;

-- $500 million project-level Upfinancing in 2021.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Holdco-only FFO leverage below 5.0x on a sustainable basis;

-- A track record of a conservative and consistent approach in
    executing the business plan from a credit perspective.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Holdco-only FFO leverage above 6.5x on a sustainable basis;

-- Underperformance in project assets that lends material
    variability or shortfall to expected project distributions on
    a sustained basis and without a clear path to recovery;

-- Aggressive cash distribution resulting in holdco-only FFO
    leverage to exceed 6.5x;

-- Lack of access to funding that causes TERPO to deviate from
    its target capital structure.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

ISSUER PROFILE

TERPO owns and operates 4.2GW of diversified wind and solar assets
predominantly in the U.S., Europe and Canada. In 2020, 57% and 43%
of the generation capacity are from wind and solar; 41% and 59% of
projected revenue are from wind and solar respectively. 94% of the
cash flows are under long term contracts or regulatory framework.
Average remaining term of long-term contracts is 12 years.


THOR INDUSTRIES: S&P Rates New $400MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '5'
recovery rating to Thor Industries Inc.'s proposed $400 million
senior unsecured notes due 2029, and affirmed the 'BB+' issue-level
rating on the company's existing term loan and the '2' recovery
rating remains unchanged. Thor plans to use the proceeds of the
issuance to partially repay the outstanding balance under its
asset-based lending (ABL) facility, which was temporarily drawn to
partially finance the acquisition of Airxcel's recreational vehicle
(RV) supplier business. On Sept. 1, 2021, Thor acquired Airxcel's
RV segment for a total purchase price of $750 million, which was
financed at closing by $125 million of cash on hand and a $625
million draw under the company's ABL. At the same time, Thor
upsized the ABL capacity to $1 billion from $750 million to fund
the acquisition and working capital needs. The 'BB' issuer credit
rating and stable outlook are unchanged.

S&P said, "We expect Thor will continue to experience good demand
for its products, and we assume total revenue (including acquired
Airxcel revenue) grows about 12%-17% in fiscal 2022 (ending July)
compared with fiscal 2021 reported results. North American
dealership inventories remain low, and Thor's backlog is at a
record high level of about $16.9 billion as of July 2021; these
factors contribute to our belief that the company's revenue
generation could remain robust through fiscal 2022 and a portion of
fiscal 2023. We preliminarily assume that retail demand growth
could begin to slow starting in late fiscal 2022, leading to
dealership inventory replenishment and low-single-digit percent
total revenue growth at Thor in fiscal 2023. Our adjusted EBITDA
margin assumption is in the 9.25%-9.75% range in fiscals 2022 and
2023. Based on these assumptions and no additional acquisitions or
other leveraging transactions, we forecast adjusted debt to EBITDA
in the 1x area in fiscal 2022 and in the 0.5x-0.75x range in fiscal
2023, which would represent a very good cushion compared with the
3.25x downgrade threshold at the current 'BB' issuer credit
rating."

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

-- S&P's issue-level rating on the proposed $400 million senior
unsecured notes is 'BB-'. The recovery rating is '5' and indicates
its expectation of modest (10%-30%; rounded estimate: 15%) recovery
for senior unsecured lenders in the event of a payment default. The
proposed issuance is guaranteed by all existing and future domestic
subsidiaries of Thor that guarantee the term loan.

-- S&P views the proposed senior unsecured notes and secured term
loan deficiency claims to be pari passu and share ratably in the
value from non-obligor assets (primarily European subsidiary Erwin
Hymer Group (EHG)), after EHG subsidiary-level debt claims are
satisfied. The non-obligor foreign subsidiaries provide a 65% stock
pledge to the ABL, term loan, and senior unsecured notes.

-- S&P said, "Our issue-level rating on the company's senior
secured term loan due 2026 is 'BB+'. The term loan comprises a U.S.
dollar tranche and a euro tranche. Both tranches of the term loan
have claims to the same collateral package. The '2' recovery rating
indicates our expectation for substantial (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 85%) recovery for lenders in the event of a payment
default."

-- The term loan is secured by substantially all assets of the
loan parties, which are defined as Thor Industries Inc. and its
direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries. The liens
securing the term loan are first-priority for all collateral, other
than the ABL priority collateral, and second-priority for the ABL
priority collateral.

-- S&P's analysis incorporates Thor's upsized ABL commitment of $1
billion.

-- S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a default
occurring in 2026 because of a substantial decline in cash flow due
to a prolonged economic downturn and a decline in the availability
of consumer credit, the combination of which significantly reduces
demand for the company's RVs.

-- S&P assumes a reorganization following the default and use a 6x
emergence EBITDA multiple to value the company.

-- Because there is a euro-denominated tranche in the term loan,
S&P might periodically adjust its assumed EBITDA at emergence and
debt exposure at default for any material changes in currency
exchange rates.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Simulated year of default: 2026
-- Emergence EBITDA: $380 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 6x
-- ABL facility: 60% drawn at default

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $2.17
billion

-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 81%/19%

-- Estimated priority ABL claims on the obligor: $612 million

-- Estimated European subsidiary-level secured real estate and
unsecured debt claims on the non-obligor (primarily European Erwin
Hymer Group assets): $102 million

-- Value available to secured term loan claims: $1.38 billion

-- Estimated secured term loan claims: $1.59 billion

    --Recovery expectations: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 85%)

-- Value available to senior unsecured lenders (for senior
unsecured notes and deficiency term loan claims): $108 million

-- Estimated senior unsecured claims (senior unsecured notes and
deficiency term loan claims): $652 million

    --Recovery expectations: 10%-30% (rounded estimate: 15%)

All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.



TIMESHARE TERMINATION: False Advertising Suit Halted by Filing
--------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Hale of Law360 reports that the bankruptcy filings by a
timeshare exit firm and its owners brought a halt Monday, October
4, 2021, to a false advertising suit against them in Florida
federal court, where timeshare company Bluegreen Vacations
Unlimited Inc. had recently argued that any shortfall of the
timeshare exit firm's funds was the result of fraudulent
transactions.

Miami-based U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom issued a last-minute
cancellation of a hearing scheduled for Monday afternoon on
Bluegreen's motion for a preliminary injunction after Timeshare
Termination Team LLC and its owners, Brian and Holly Wilbur,
submitted notice in the morning that they had filed for bankruptcy
protection.

                About Timeshare Terminational Team

Timeshare Terminational Team LLC is a timeshare exit company in
Greenwood Village, Colorado.  Timeshare Termination Team sought
Chapter 7 protection (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 21-15008) on Sept.
30, 2021.  The case is handled by Honorable Judge Kimberley H
Tyson.  Jonathan Dickey, of Kutner Brinen Dickey Riley, P.C., is
the Debtor's counsel.


USA GYMNASTICS: Defeats Bankruptcy Plan Vote Challenge of Insurer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf of Bloomberg Law reports that TIG Insurance Co. lost its
bid to block USA Gymnastics from soliciting votes for a Chapter 11
plan centered around a $425 million sex abuse settlement.

TIG, the only USA Gymnastics insurer that hasn't agreed to settle
claims stemming from former team doctor Larry Nassar's years-long
sexual abuse, has taken issue with proposed plan provisions that
hand over proceeds and collection rights under the organization's
insurance policies to a victims' settlement trust.

But TIG's objections don't "have legs," and aren't enough to block
voting on the plan, Judge Robyn L. Moberly of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Indiana.

                        About USA Gymnastics

USA Gymnastics -- https://www.usagym.org/ -- is a not-for-profit
organization incorporated in Texas. Based in Indianapolis, Indiana,
USAG's organization encompasses six disciplines: women's
gymnastics, men's gymnastics, trampoline and tumbling, rhythmic
gymnastics, acrobatic gymnastics, and group gymnastics. USAG
provides educational opportunities for coaches and judges, as well
as gymnastics club owners and administrators, and sanctions
approximately 4,000 competitions and events throughout the United
States annually. More than 200,000 athletes, professionals, and
clubs are members of USAG.  USAG sets the rules and policies that
govern the sport of gymnastics in the United States, including
selecting and training the United States gymnastics teams for the
Olympics and World Championships.  As of the Petition Date, USAG
employs 53 individuals, nearly all of whom work for USAG
full-time.

USA Gymnastics sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case
No. 18-09108) on Dec. 5, 2018.  USAG estimated $50 million to $100
million in assets and the same range of liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Robyn L. Moberly is the case judge.

USAG tapped JENNER & BLOCK LLP as counsel; ALFERS GC CONSULTING,
LLC and SCRAMBLE SYSTEMS, LLC, as business consulting services
providers; and OMNI Management Group, Inc., as claims agent.


VENOCO LLC: Supreme Court Denies CA Appeal of Trustee Taking Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Montgomery of Law360 reports that the U.S. Supreme Court on
Monday, Oct. 4, 2021, refused to hear a California agency's appeal
challenging lower court findings that a bankruptcy trustee's
inverse condemnation claim trumped state sovereign immunity
defenses in the regulatory takeover of oil company land and assets
during an offshore spill cleanup.

In a certiorari denial listed in a string of October
session-opening decisions, the justices rejected an appeal by the
California State Lands Commission without comment. The commission
sought reversal of the Third Circuit's May 24 finding that a 2006
high court ruling made bankruptcy's "in rem" jurisdiction over the
Chapter 11 estate of oil driller Venoco LLC.

                         About Venoco LLC

Venoco, LLC, is a California-based and privately owned independent
energy company primarily focused on the acquisition, exploration,
production and development of oil and gas properties. As of April
2017, Venoco held interests in approximately 57,859 net acres, of
which approximately 40,945 are developed.

In the midst of a historic collapse in the oil and gas industry,
Venoco, Inc. -- the predecessor in interest to Venoco, LLC -- and
six of Venoco, Inc.'s affiliates commenced voluntary Chapter 11
cases (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 16-10655) on March 18, 2016, in
Delaware to address their overleveraged capital structure. In under
four months, the 2016 Debtors confirmed a plan eliminating more
than $1 billion in funded debt and other liabilities.

On April 17, 2017, each of Venoco, LLC, and six of its subsidiaries
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-10828). As of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors estimated
assets in the range of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities
of up to $100 million.

Judge Kevin Gross presides over the 2017 cases.  

The Debtors have hired Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP and
Bracewell LLP as counsel; Zolfo Cooper LLC as restructuring and
turnaround advisor; Seaport Global Securities LLC as financial
advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims, noticing and balloting
agent.


WA INC: Seeks to Hire Goering & Goering as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
WA, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Ohio to employ Goering & Goering, LLC to serve
as legal counsel in its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's services include:

     (a) taking all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
estate, including the prosecution of actions on the Debtor's
behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against the Debtor or
the estate, negotiations concerning all litigation in which the
Debtor may currently be involved, and objections to claims filed
against the estate;

     (b) preparing legal papers;

     (c) negotiating and preparing a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and all related documents; and

     (d) performing all other necessary legal services.

The hourly rates for the firm's attorneys who will be primarily
responsible for representing the Debtor are as follows:

     Eric Goering               $400 per hour
     Robert Alfred Goering      $500 per hour
     Alexis M. Mize             $300 per hour

The firm received $17,610 for pre-bankruptcy work, $1,738 for the
filing fee and $20,652 as retainer.

Eric Goering, Esq., at Goering, disclosed in court filings that his
firm does not have any connection with the Debtor, creditors or any
"party-in-interest."

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Eric W. Goering, Esq.
     Robert A. Goering, Esq.
     Alexis Mize, Esq.
     Goering & Goering, LLC
     220 West Third Street
     Cincinnati, OH 45202
     Telephone: (513) 621-0912

                           About WA Inc.

Cincinnati, Ohio-based WA, Inc. filed its voluntary petition for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 21-12122) on Oct.
1, 2021, listing up to $500,000 in assets and up to $10 million in
liabilities.  Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins oversees the case.  Robert
A. Goering, Esq., at Goering & Goering represents the Debtor as
legal counsel.


WEST C BUILDERS: May Use Cadence Bank Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California,
Santa Rosa Division, has authorized West C Builders, Inc. to use
cash collateral in accordance with the Stipulation filed October 1,
2021.

The parties agree the Debtor is authorized to use the cash
collateral of Cadence Bank in accordance with the budget, with a
20% variance.

The Debtor must remit monthly adequate-protection payments to
Cadence Bank, in the amount of at least the payment pursuant to the
loan documents regarding the Debtor's loan from Cadence Bank and on
the due date set forth in the loan documents. If the Debtor fails
to remit any such payment, Cadence Bank may immediately  terminate
the Debtor's authority to use cash collateral by filing a notice of
such termination.
  
Cadence Bank has a first-priority replacement lien on all the
Debtor's post-petition assets, to the extent of the Debtor's use of
the petition date bank account balances and the petition date
accounts receivable from the petition date forward.

The Debtor must account, at least twice per month, showing by
budget category the amounts expended during the time period and
showing, by project, the receipts during the time period. The
accounting must include printouts of all deposits and withdrawals
from the Debtor's bank accounts, downloaded from the Debtor's
online access to the accounts, tying the accounting to the bank
records. The reports must be received by Cadence Bank's counsel no
later than 3 business days after the 15th of each month and the end
of each month. If the Debtor fails timely to deliver any
accounting, Cadence Bank may immediately terminate the Debtor's
authority to use cash collateral by filing a notice of such
termination.

A copy of the stipulation and the Debtor's October 2021 budget is
available at https://bit.ly/3uF5rIJ from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $110,000 in total income and $99,441.56 in
total expenses.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3oxsfsG from
PacerMonitor.com.

                    About West C Builders, Inc.

West C Builders, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 21-10263) on May
26, 2021. In the petition signed by Anton D. Council, president,
the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Roger L. Efremsky oversees the case.

Gina R. Klump, Esq. at Law Office of Gina R. Klump is the Debtor's
counsel.



WILLCO X DEVELOPMENT: Taps Mitchell Hoffman as Expert Witness
-------------------------------------------------------------
Willco X Development, LLLP received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to hire Mitchell
Hoffman, a certified public accountant at Harper Hofer &
Associates, LLC, to serve as an expert witness.

Mr. Hoffman will provide an expert assessment of, and testimony
concerning, the Debtor's assessment and projections with respect to
its operations, the probable value of its business, and the
probabilities attending the refinancing and alternative sale
outcomes reflected in its Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

Mr. Hoffman's hourly rate is $345.

In court papers, Mr. Hoffman disclosed that he is a "disinterested
person" within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Mr. Hoffman holds office at:

     Mitchell Hoffman, CPA/ABV
     Harper Hofer & Associates, LLC
     216 16th Street, Suite 850
     Denver, CO 80202
     Phone: +1 303-486-0000
     Email: hoffman@harperhofer.com

                  About Willco X Development LLP

Willco X Development, LLLP, operator of the Hilton Garden Inn of
Thornton in Colo., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Colo.
Case No. 20-16438) on Sept. 29, 2020, listing as much as $50
million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Thomas B. McNamara
oversees the case.  

Weinman & Associates, P.C., led by Jeffrey A. Weinman, Esq., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel while EasonLaw, LLC serves as its
litigation counsel.  

Independent Bank, as lender, is represented by John F. Young, Esq.,
at Markus Williams Young & Hunsicker, LLC.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 19 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case on Nov. 17, 2020.  The
committee is represented by Brinkman Law Group, PC.


WILLCO X: Gets OK to Hire John Smiley as Expert Witness
-------------------------------------------------------
Willco X Development, LLLP seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to employ John
Smiley, Esq., an attorney at Sender & Smiley, LLC, to serve as an
expert witness.

Mr. Smiley has agreed to review, assess and testify concerning the
methodology and assumptions underlying the Debtor's liquidation
analysis for an hourly fee of $500.

In court papers, Mr. Smiley disclosed that he is a "disinterested
person" qualified to be employed under Section 327(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Smiley holds office at:

     John C. Smiley
     Sender & Smiley, LLC
     600 17th Street, Suite 2800 South
     Denver, CO 80202
     Email: Jsmiley@SenderSmiley.com

                  About Willco X Development LLP

Willco X Development, LLLP, operator of the Hilton Garden Inn of
Thornton in Colo., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Colo.
Case No. 20-16438) on Sept. 29, 2020, listing as much as $50
million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Thomas B. McNamara
oversees the case.  

Weinman & Associates, P.C., led by Jeffrey A. Weinman, Esq., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel while EasonLaw, LLC serves as its
litigation counsel.  

Independent Bank, as lender, is represented by John F. Young, Esq.,
at Markus Williams Young & Hunsicker, LLC.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 19 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case on Nov. 17, 2020.  The
committee is represented by Brinkman Law Group, PC.


WILSON GOMER: Claims Will be Paid From Continued Operations
-----------------------------------------------------------
Wilson Gomer MD Professional Medical Corporation filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California a Plan
of Reorganization for Small Business dated September 30, 2021.

Since 2017, the Debtor has been in the business of operating a
family medical practice in the  Loma Linda-San Bernardino, CA area.
The Debtor maintains two offices where patients are seen and
provided medical care.

Historically, the Debtor's family medical practice was financially
solvent, that is, the medical practice generated enough income to
pay all its operating expenses, taxes, and other obligations.  The
Debtor's financial issues relate to the esthetics/body sculpting
practice that Dr. Gomer tried to build up in 2019 and 2020.
Unfortunately, this practice area was never successful or
profitable; the Covid-19 pandemic forced Debtor to close its
offices for several months last year, and Debtor was never able to
attract many patients for the laser body sculpting services.

Nearly all the Debtor's debt consists of the expired leases for the
5 laser machines. Debtor has returned 2 of the 5 machines, and is
seeking to return the remaining machines prior to confirmation of
Debtor's Plan.  The total amount of debt for the filed claims is
about $660,000.  The Debtor has only a few assets of low value that
it could liquidate to pay off these debts.

This Plan of Reorganization proposes to pay creditors from cash
flow from operations:

   * Class 1 consists of Priority Claims. Any allowed priority
claims will be unimpaired, and each holder of a Class 1 Priority
Claim will be paid in full, in cash, upon the later of the
effective date of this Plan, or the date on which such claim is
allowed by a final non-appealable order.

   * Class 3 consists of Non-priority unsecured creditors. Class 3
claims will be impaired and will receive plan payments based on
Debtor's projected disposable income.

The Debtor shall continue in business and Dr. Wilson Gomer will
continue to manage the Debtor.  Dr. Gomer took a cut in his salary
as of May 2021, with his compensation reduced from about $185,000
per year to $140,000 per year, in order to increase the Debtor's
ability to propose and successfully complete a Subchapter V Plan.
Dr. Gomer's salary, as well as the salary of his wife, Dory Gomer,
will remain consistent during the life of Debtor's Plan.

A full-text copy of the Plan of Reorganization dated September 30,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/2YmMezL from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                     About Wilson Gomer MD Prof
                          Medical Corporation

Wilson Gomer MD Prof Medical Corporation sought protection for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 21-13502) on June 25, 2021, listing under $1 million in
both assets and liabilities.  Judge Wayne E. Johnson oversees the
case.  Jason E. Turner, Esq., at J. Turner Law Group, APC, is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


WINDSTREAM HOLDINGS: Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Vendor Appeal
----------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Archer of Law360 reports that the Supreme Court on Monday,
October 4, 2021, declined to hear arguments from a Windstream
Holdings creditor that the Second Circuit wrongly applied the
equitable mootness doctrine when it found it was too late to
challenge vendor payments in the cable provider's bankruptcy case.


The high court denied certiorari to waste management contractor GLM
DFW Inc.'s petition arguing the high court needs to resolve circuit
splits on the application of equitable mootness and prevent risks
of a too-broad interpretation of the doctrine that it said could
spring from the Second Circuit's denial of its appeal.

                      About Windstream Holdings

Windstream Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiaries provide advanced
network communications and technology solutions for businesses
across the United States. They also offer broadband, entertainment
and security solutions to consumers and small businesses primarily
in rural areas in 18 states.

Windstream Holding Inc. and its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-22312) on Feb. 25,
2019.

The Debtors had total assets of $13,126,435,000 and total debt of
$11,199,070,000 as of Jan. 31, 2019.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP as counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial advisor
and investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as
restructuring advisor; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants as notice
and claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on March 12, 2019.  The committee tapped
Morrison & Foerster LLP as its legal counsel, AlixPartners, LLP, as
its financial advisor, and Perella Weinberg Partners LP as
investment banker.


ZACH HALOPOFF: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Zach Halopoff Inc.
          d/b/a Halo Industries Inc.
        9 Studebaker Drive
        Irvine, CA 92618

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 21-12420

Judge: Hon. Scott C. Clarkson

Debtor's Counsel: David L. Neale, Esq.
                  LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.
                  2818 La Cienega Avenue
                  Los Angeles, CA 90034
                  Tel: (310) 229-1234
                  E-mail: dln@lnbyb.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Zeeshawn Zia as president.

The Debtor listed Last Chance Funding Inc. as its sole unsecured
creditor holding a claim of $3,333,196.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/WCPQPHQ/Zach_Halopoff_Inc__cacbke-21-12420__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ZNB LLP: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------
Debtor: ZNB LLP
        830 High Street
        Chestertown, MD 21620

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Maryland

Case No.: 21-16310

Debtor's Counsel: Tate M. Russack, Esq.
                  RLC, PA LAWYERS & CONSULTANTS
                  7999 North Federal Highway
                  Suite 102
                  Boca Raton, FL 33487
                  Tel: 561-571-9610
                  Fax: 800-883-5692
                  E-mail: Tate@russack.net

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Harry Kaiser as managing partner.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/CQFT5QY/ZNB_LLP__mdbke-21-16310__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


[*] Carl Marks Advisors Bags Three M&A Advisor Turnaround Awards
----------------------------------------------------------------
Carl Marks Advisors, a leading investment bank providing financial
and operational advisory services to middle market companies, on
Sept. 30 disclosed that it has been recognized with three awards at
The M&A Advisor's 15th Annual Turnaround Awards, one of the
restructuring and distressed investing industry's benchmarks for
excellence. Carl Marks Advisors was honored in the following
categories:

   * Out-of-Court Restructuring of the Year ($50M to $100M)
   * Restructuring of the Year ($50MM to $100MM)
   * Restructuring of the Year ($500MM to $1B)

Carl Marks Advisors won in the "Out-of-Court Restructuring of the
Year" category for its work as Chief Restructuring Officer ("CRO")
for Lenox Corporation, the well-known manufacturer, distributor,
and retailer of tableware. Originally brought on to conduct a
business assessment of the company, Carl Marks Advisors was
reengaged as CRO, helping implement a business turnaround in that
role. CMA's efforts included retaining necessary levels of lender
and vendor support and liquidity, navigating the Company through
the COVID-19 pandemic, and supporting the close of an out-of-court
sale. A bankruptcy filing was thus avoided, an event that had
seemed likely at the start of the engagement and could have led to
the liquidation of the business.

In addition, Carl Marks Advisors was honored with the
"Restructuring of the Year ($50MM to $100MM)" award for its work
with Bar Louie, the locally themed, national gastro-bar operator
and franchisor. The chain, which operated more than 100 venues at
its peak, retained Carl Marks Advisors to serve as CRO, leading the
company through a Chapter 11 filing and successful emergence via a
363 sale during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Finally, the "Restructuring of the Year ($500MM to $1B)" award
recognized the firm's work with American Addiction Centers (AAC), a
nationwide inpatient and outpatient addiction care and recovery
center. Under Carl Marks Advisors' guidance, AAC successfully
exited Chapter 11 with a recapitalized balance sheet and was able
to continue to treat patients throughout the bankruptcy process,
despite the added stress of the pandemic.

"We are very proud of our teams' hard work and dedication
throughout the past year, which presented so many unique
challenges, and we are gratified to see it recognized by The M&A
Advisor," said Duff Meyercord, Managing Partner, Carl Marks
Advisors. "These three transactions are great examples of the
positive impact we can have in helping companies navigate even the
most perilous circumstances."

                  About Carl Marks Advisors

Carl Marks Advisory Group LLC (Carl Marks Advisors) is a New
York-based investment bank that provides financial and operational
advisory services. Its integrated client service teams unite
industry, operations, and transaction expertise to create effective
solutions in complex situations. Securities are offered through
Carl Marks Securities LLC, member FINRA and SIPC.  Additional
information about Carl Marks Advisory Group LLC and Carl Marks
Securities LLC is available at http://www.carlmarksadvisors.com/
and http://www.carlmarkssecurities.com/



[*] Commercial Chapter 11 Filings Down 6% in September 2021
-----------------------------------------------------------
Epiq, a global technology-enabled services leader to the legal
services industry and corporations, released its September 2021
bankruptcy filing statistics from its AACER bankruptcy information
services business.  Overall, September new filings for all chapters
were down 4% or 30,907 month-over-month, down from 32,263 in August
2021.  Total individual chapter 13 filings are up 6% over August,
with 9,930 new cases.  Total individual chapter 7 filings are down
9% over August, with 19,230 cases.  Total commercial chapter 11 new
filings are also down 6% over August, with 247 new cases.

Individual Chapter 7 new filings have decreased each month since
March 2021 while individual Chapter 13 filings have increased each
month starting in May.

A chart accompanying this announcement is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7c778d7a-d6b4-4a2e-8d72-b38ed0a0a947

The 2021 total open bankruptcy cases which include cases closed
plus new cases filed this year continue to slide. September ended
at 773,652 open cases, down 11% or 98,556 cases from the start of
2021.

A chart accompanying this announcement is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/6e51dcd8-4e1c-4bc8-a941-b62af61853ad

"The bankruptcy new filings volume and chapter mix trends will
likely change over the coming months with the Federal and State
programs like the eviction moratorium expiring on September 30,
2021," said Todd Madsen, senior director of Epiq Bankruptcy
Analytics. "However, numerous states like California have rent
reimbursement programs, with funds in place that will continue to
ward off new bankruptcy filings as moratoriums expire."

                         About Epiq AACER

Epiq AACER is your partner for bankruptcy information and
compliance. Its AACER bankruptcy information services platform is
built with superior data, technology, and expertise to create
insight and mitigate risk for businesses impacted by bankruptcies.
It offers free bankruptcy statistics and monthly email updates for
both commercial and non-commercial consumer bankruptcy filings for
Chapter 7, Chapter 11, and Chapter 13 cases.

                            About Epiq

Epiq, a global technology-enabled services leader to the legal
services industry and corporations, takes on large-scale,
increasingly complex tasks for corporate counsel, law firms, and
business professionals with efficiency, clarity, and confidence.
Clients rely on Epiq to streamline the administration of business
operations, class action and mass tort, court reporting,
eDiscovery, regulatory, compliance, restructuring, and bankruptcy
matters. Epiq subject-matter experts and technologies create
efficiency through expertise and deliver confidence to
high-performing clients around the world.  Learn more at
https://www.epiqglobal.com/



[*] Judge Guy Cole Jr. to Receive American Inns of Court Award
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge R. Guy Cole Jr. has been selected to receive the prestigious
2021 American Inns of Court Professionalism Award for the Sixth
Circuit. A judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth
Circuit, he served as the court's chief judge -- and the court's
first-ever African American chief judge -- from 2014 until April
this year. Nominated by President Bill Clinton, Cole joined the
court of appeals in 1995.

"As the chief judge of our circuit, Judge Cole has conducted
himself with the highest degree of character and integrity," write
Judge Richard Allen Griffin and his fellow judges on the sixth
circuit, who nominated Cole for the award. "In this regard, Guy
Cole has led by example, to the betterment of our court and
circuit." According to Griffin and his colleagues, Cole's
accomplishments as chief judge include leading the circuit through
the COVID-19 crisis, creating an employee appreciation program,
improving the court's efficiency and professionalism, eliminating
the court's backlog, and reviving the court's collegiality.

Before joining the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,
Judge Cole had experience in both public service and the private
sector. On the public service side, he served as a U.S. bankruptcy
judge for the Southern District of Ohio from 1987 to 1993 and was a
trial attorney for the commercial litigation branch of the U.S.
Department of Justice, Civil Division, earlier in his career. In
the private sector, he was in practice at the Columbus, Ohio, law
firm Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, eventually becoming the
firm's first African American partner. Since 2010, Cole has also
been an adjunct professor of law at The Ohio State University's
Moritz College of Law.

Judge Cole received the Distinguished Achievement Award from the
Tufts Alumni Association in 2016. He has also helped lead several
community organizations focused on health, education, and young
people. In addition to serving as vice chair of The Ohio State
University's James Cancer Hospital Board, he has held leadership
positions at the Columbus Children's Hospital, March of Dimes,
YMCA, Columbus Area International Program, and I Know I Can, an
initiative that helps public school students in Columbus attain
college educations.

Judge Cole received his undergraduate degree from Tufts University
in 1972 and his law degree from Yale Law School in 1975.

The American Inns of Court, headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia,
inspires the legal community to advance the rule of law by
achieving the highest level of professionalism through example,
education, and mentoring. The organization's membership includes
nearly 30,000 federal, state, and local judges; lawyers; law
professors; and law students in nearly 370 chapters nationwide.
More information is available at http://www.innsofcourt.org/



[] B.Riley Adds Three Senior Executives to Restructuring Division
-----------------------------------------------------------------
B. Riley Financial announced continued growth in its restructuring
division with the addition of three new senior executives. John
Sordillo, Jeffrey Truitt and Tim Hannon have joined B. Riley
Advisory Services and bring several decades of experience and
proven expertise in complex financial management and restructuring
advisory.

"We continue to enhance our business restructuring services with
some of the best talent available in the market as demand for our
middle-market advisory services continues to grow," said Ian
Ratner, Co-CEO of B. Riley Advisory Services, the firm's specialty
financial consulting business. "Corporates, private equity firms,
portfolio companies, and lenders each have their own unique
challenges, and we believe B. Riley has assembled a best-in-class
team to help guide our clients through their most mission critical
initiatives in the year ahead and beyond. We are thrilled to
welcome John, Jeffrey and Tim to our growing team."

Based in New York, John Sordillo joins as a Senior Managing
Director and has over 30 years of accounting, finance, turnaround
and restructuring experience, including as interim officer and
chief restructuring officer in distressed situations, and as a
principal investor in turnaround situations. He serves as a trusted
advisor to companies, lenders, PE funds and other institutional
investors in restructuring, corporate finance and litigation
situations across a variety of industries including real estate,
oil and gas, energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, gaming,
healthcare and retail. Prior to B. Riley, he served in several
senior restructuring advisory roles with firms including Broadview
Business Advisors, CBIZ, Loughlin Management Partners, Deloitte,
Ernst & Young (EY), and AlixPartners. In addition, he has served as
a principal in the U.S. merchant banking business of TD Bank
Financial Group. Mr. Sordillo earned a BBA in Public Accounting
from Pace University and JD from Brooklyn Law School.

Jeffrey Truitt joins as a Senior Managing Director and leads the
firm's restructuring practice in Los Angeles. He has over 30 years
of experience as a restructuring and turnaround professional
serving as a trusted advisor to myriad companies, secured
creditors, ad hoc bondholder groups, official committees and other
interested parties in connection with out-of-court financial
restructurings, operational turnarounds and/or chapter 11
reorganizations. Mr. Truitt has held various interim C-level
management positions, including as CEO, CFO and CRO, and has served
as court-appointed examiner in large Chapter 11 cases. Prior to
joining the firm, Truitt was a Senior Managing Director at FTI
Consulting and previously held various senior positions in the
corporate restructuring practices of XRoads Solutions Group,
Mesirow Financial Consulting, KPMG and Arthur Andersen. He holds
several professional designations including CTP, CIRA and CDBV.
Truitt earned a BA in Economics from the University of California,
Los Angeles and an MBA from the UCLA Anderson Graduate School of
Management.

Tim Hannon joins as a Managing Director in Atlanta and brings over
30 years of experience in executive financial management and
financial advisory services. He has served as CFO and Corporate
Controller for companies ranging in size from $50 million to $1
billion. Most recently, Mr. Hannon was CFO for a $900 million fresh
food CPG company. He began his career with Arthur Andersen in New
York and has worked in the turnaround and transaction advisory
practices at Zolfo Cooper and KPMG. He is a CPA (NY) and has CMA
and CIRA designations. Mr. Hannon earned a BS in Accounting from
the State University of New York at Albany.

For more information about B. Riley Advisory Services, visit:
www.brileyadvisoryservices.com.

                 About B. Riley Advisory Services

B. Riley Advisory Services (NASDAQ: RILY) is a financial consulting
and valuation firm that works with law firms, lenders, private
equity sponsors, and companies of all types on business challenges
such as planning and executing a major acquisition or divestiture,
pursuing a fraud investigation or corporate litigation, or managing
through a business crisis or bankruptcy. The firm offers a unique
mix of appraisal services including asset-based lending (ABL)
valuations, restructuring and turnaround management, forensic
accounting and litigation support, and transaction support services
including due diligence and quality of earnings reviews. The firm
is a subsidiary of B. Riley Financial.

B. Riley Financial provides collaborative solutions tailored to fit
the capital raising and business advisory needs of its clients and
partners. B. Riley operates through several subsidiaries that offer
a diverse range of complementary end-to-end capabilities spanning
investment banking and institutional brokerage, private wealth and
investment management, financial consulting, corporate
restructuring, operations management, risk and compliance, due
diligence, forensic accounting, litigation support, appraisal and
valuation, auction and liquidation services.  On the Web:
http://www.brileyfin.com/


[] Byron Moldo Named Geneva's Restructuring Group Chief
-------------------------------------------------------
Ervin Cohen & Jessup (ECJ) on Sept. 30 disclosed that Byron Z.
Moldo, chair of the Firm's Bankruptcy, Receivership and Creditors'
Rights Department, has been elected to Global Chairperson of the
Debt Collection, Restructuring & Insolvency practice group at
Geneva Group International (GGI), a worldwide alliance of
well-established and experienced law, accounting and consulting
firms committed to providing clients with specialist solutions for
their international business requirements.

"GGI is one of the largest international alliances of law,
accounting and consulting firms, and our participation in this
respected network provides our clients tremendous resources
throughout the world," said Randall S. Leff, Ervin Cohen & Jessup's
co-managing partner and a member of GGI's Executive Committee. "We
are proud to see Byron take on this leadership role."

Mr. Moldo's practice focus has always been bankruptcy,
receivership, assignments for the benefit of creditors and all
aspects of insolvency. He regularly serves as a Receiver in state
and federal court cases, as assignee for the benefit of creditors,
and as a fiduciary in other court-supervised matters. In addition,
a substantial portion of his work consists of serving as general or
special counsel to receivers, bankruptcy trustees, and other
fiduciaries. Mr. Moldo also represents creditors' committees and
secured creditors, and has been appointed as a Disbursing Agent,
Chapter 11 Plan Confirmation Agent, and to serve in other fiduciary
capacities.

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP -- http://www.ecjlaw.com/-- is a
full-service firm that provides a broad range of business-related
legal services including corporate law; litigation; intellectual
property & technology law; real estate transactions, land use and
finance; construction & environmental law; tax planning and
controversies; employment law; health care law; bankruptcy,
receivership and reorganization; and estate planning.



[] John Chun Joins Herrick Feinstein's Restructuring Department
---------------------------------------------------------------
Herrick, Feinstein LLP on Sept. 27 disclosed that litigator John H.
Chun has joined its growing Restructuring & Finance Litigation
Department in New York. He comes to Herrick from Quinn Emanuel.

Mr. Chun joins Herrick as a firm partner.  He is the latest
attorney to join Herrick's rapidly growing Restructuring and
Finance Litigation Department.  Since 2019, the practice group has
added 14 new lawyers, including four partners, two counsel and
eight associates, many coming from premier, global law firms.

At Herrick, Mr. Chun will focus on a full range of complex
litigation matters. His experience includes prosecuting and
defending common law and securities fraud claims arising from
complex structured finance and M&A transactions.  Mr. Chun also has
developed top-level expertise in litigation involving trade
secrets, restrictive covenants, corporate raiding and clawback
claims.  Chun is licensed to practice in New York and has appeared
in federal courts in New York and Maryland, in both district and
appellate courts.

"We are delighted to welcome John to the firm," said Irwin Kishner,
Herrick's Executive Chairman. "John has built a reputation as an
accomplished litigator, and he brings even more depth to Herrick's
Restructuring & Finance Litigation group."

"John is a deeply skilled litigator," added Sean O'Donnell,
co-chair of Herrick's Restructuring & Finance Litigation
Department.  "He is a tremendous addition to our bench as we
solidify Herrick's position among the go-to firms for restructuring
and complex litigation."

Herrick's Restructuring & Finance Litigation team has decades of
experience advising clients in all phases of complex chapter 11
cases, out-of-court restructurings and related litigations.
Herrick's clients include official and ad hoc creditor committees,
distressed debt investors, private equity funds, hedge funds,
bondholders, secured and unsecured lenders, real estate project
owners, financial and insurance institutions, corporate debtors,
trustees, boards of directors, independent directors, special
investigation committees, foreign representatives, and other
parties-in-interest in bankruptcy cases.  In 2021 U.S. News - Best
Lawyers(R) "Best Law Firms" ranked Herrick nationally and
regionally in five practice areas, including bankruptcy and
creditor debtor rights; insolvency/reorganization.

"The breadth and synergy among Herrick's premier litigation
practices is an ideal combination for what I am able to provide
clients," Chun said. "Herrick has assembled an extremely
experienced and highly collaborative team of lawyers that I am
excited to join."

                           About Herrick

Founded in 1928, Herrick, Feinstein LLP is a prominent,
full-service law firm, providing comprehensive legal services to
businesses and individuals around the world.  From its offices in
New York City; Newark, New Jersey; and Istanbul, Turkey, Herrick
maintains robust corporate, litigation, financial restructuring and
commercial real estate capabilities, complemented by significant
depth in art, employment, government relations, intellectual
property, sports, tax, and trusts and estates.



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***