/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/210530.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Sunday, May 30, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 149

                            Headlines

ACRES COMMERCIAL 2021-FL1: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on G Notes
APEX CREDIT 2016: Moody's Hikes Rating on Class E-R Notes to B1
ARBOR REALTY 2018-FL1: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class F Notes
AVIS BUDGET 2021-1: Moody's Assigns Ba2 Rating to Class D Notes
BAIN CAPITAL 2017-1: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating on Class F Notes

BANCORP COMMERCIAL 2018-CRE4: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on F Certs
BARINGS CLO 2019-III: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Rating to Cl. E-R Notes
BBCMS MORTGAGE 2020-C7: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on Class F Certs
BDS 2021-FL7: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
BENCHMARK 2020-IG3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on 825S-D Certs

BLUEMOUNTAIN XXXI: S&P Assigns Prelim BB-(sf) Rating on E Notes
BPR TRUST 2021-WILL: Moody's Gives (P)Ba3 Rating to Cl. HRR Certs
CANYON CLO 2020-1: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on Class E-R Notes
CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL 2012-GC8: Fitch Lowers Class F Certs to 'Csf'
CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL 2016-C2: DBRS Cuts Rating of 11 Classes to CCC

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE 2021-3: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on ERR Notes
CSMC 2021-NQM3: S&P Assigns Prelim B (sf) Rating on Class B-2 Notes
DBGS 2019-1735: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on Class F Certs
ENCINA EQUIPMENT 2021-1: DBRS Gives Prov. BB(sf) Rating on E Notes
EXETER AUTOMOBILE 2021-2: S&P Assigns (P) BB(sf) Rating on E Notes

FLAGSHIP CREDIT 2021-2: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on E Notes
GALAXY XXII: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating on Class F-RR Notes
GPMT 2021-FL3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
GS MORTGAGE 2021-ROSS: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on G Notes
HALCYON LOAN 2015-1: Moody's Lowers Rating on Class E Notes to Caa3

ICG US 2016-1: S&P Assigns Prelim BB-(sf) Rating on DR-R Notes
INVESCO CLO 2021-2: Moody's Gives (P)Ba3 Rating to Class E Notes
JP MORGAN 2021-7: Fitch Gives 'B+(EXP)' Rating to Class B-5 Debt
JUNIPER RECEIVABLES 2019-1: Moody's Ups A Notes Rating From Ba2
KKR CLO 33: S&P Assigns Prelim BB- (sf) Rating on Class E Notes

LOANCORE 2019-CRE3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class F Notes
MARBLE POINT XX: S&P Assigns BB-(sf) Rating on $14MM Class E Notes
MVW 2021-1W: S&P Assigns BB (sf) Rating on $31.225MM Class D Notes
NLT 2021-INV1: S&P Assigns Prelim B (sf) Rating on Class B-2 Certs
OPORTUN ISSUANCE 2021-B: DBRS Finalizes BB(high) Rating on D Notes

PALMER SQUARE 2018-3: S&P Affirms B-(sf) Rating on Class E-R2 Notes
PIKES PEAK 6: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to Class F-R Notes
READY CAPITAL 2019-FL3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on F Notes
REAL ESTATE 2019-1: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on Class G Certs
SCMT 2021-SBC10: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on Class F Certs

SEQUOIA MORTGAGE 2021-4: Fitch Assigns BB- Rating on B-4 Certs
SFO COMMERCIAL 2021-555: DBRS Finalizes BB Rating on Class F Notes
SFO COMMERCIAL 2021-555: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on F Certs
STARWOOD MORTGAGE 2021-2: S&P Assigns B (sf) Rating on B-2 Certs
STARWOOD RESIDENTIAL 2021-2: DBRS Gives (P) B Rating on B2 Notes

UBS-CITIGROUP 2011-C1: DBRS Lowers Class F Certs Rating to C(sf)
VELOCITY COMMERCIAL 2021-1: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on 3 Classes
VERUS SECURITIZATION 2021-R3: DBRS Gives (P)B Rating on B-2 Notes
VISIO 2021-1R: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on Class B-2 Notes
VMC FINANCE 2021-FL4: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on G Notes

VOYA CLO 2017-1: Moody's Raises Class C Notes Rating From Ba1
WELLFLEET CLO X: S&P Assigns B- Rating on $5.550MM Class E Notes
WELLS FARGO 2019-1: S&P Affirms 'BB-(sf)' Class B-4 Certs Rating
WORLDWIDE PLAZA 2017-WWP: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class F Certs
[*] S&P Takes Various Actions on 127 Classes from 20 US RMBS Deals


                            *********

ACRES COMMERCIAL 2021-FL1: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on G Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following
classes of notes issued/co-issued by ACRES Commercial Realty
2021-FL1 Issuer, Ltd. and ACRES Commercial Realty 2021-FL1
Co-Issuer, LLC:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable

CORONAVIRUS OVERVIEW

With regard to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the
magnitude and extent of performance stress posed to global
structured finance transactions remain highly uncertain. This
considers the fiscal and monetary policy measures and statutory law
changes that have already been implemented or will be implemented
to soften the impact of the crisis on global economies. Some
regions, jurisdictions, and asset classes are, however, feeling
more immediate effects. Accordingly, DBRS Morningstar may apply
additional short-term stresses to its rating analysis. For example,
DBRS Morningstar may front-load default expectations and/or assess
the liquidity position of a structured finance transaction with
more stressful operational risk and/or cash flow timing
considerations.

DBRS Morningstar analyzed the pool to determine the provisional
ratings, reflecting the long-term risk that the Issuer will default
and fail to satisfy its financial obligations in accordance with
the terms of the transaction. The initial collateral consists of 33
floating-rate mortgage loans secured by 37 mostly transitional real
estate properties, with a cut-off pool balance totaling
approximately $802.6 million, excluding approximately $50.1 million
of future funding commitments. The initial pool is composed of 19
whole loans and 14 participations. Most loans are in a period of
transition with plans to stabilize and improve the asset value. The
transaction is a managed vehicle with a 24-month reinvestment
period. During the reinvestment period, so long as the note
protection tests are satisfied and no EOD has occurred and is
continuing, the Issuer may acquire future funding commitments and
additional eligible loans subject to the eligibility criteria,
which among other things, has a minimum debt service coverage ratio
(DSCR) and loan-to-value ratio (LTV), a 16.0 Herfindahl score, and
loan size limitations. The eligibility criteria stipulate rating
agency confirmation (RAC) on reinvestment loans (except in the case
of acquisitions of up to a $5.0 million pari passu participation
interest if a portion of the underlying loan is already included in
the pool) thereby allowing DBRS Morningstar the ability to review
the new collateral interest and any potential impacts to the
overall ratings. There is no ramp period; however, there is one
delayed close asset, representing 4.3% of the cut-off balance,
which is expected to close prior to or within 90 days of the
closing date. The transaction will have a sequential-pay structure.
For so long as any class of notes with a higher priority is
outstanding, any interest due on the Class F Notes or the Class G
Notes can be deferred and interest deferral will not result in an
EOD.

All the loans in the pool have floating interest rates initially
indexed to Libor and are interest only (IO) (except for one loan)
through their initial terms. As such, to determine a stressed
interest rate over the loan term, DBRS Morningstar used the
one-month Libor rate, which was the lower of DBRS Morningstar's
stressed rates that corresponded to the remaining fully extended
term of the loans and the strike price of the interest rate cap
with the respective contractual loan spread added. The pool
exhibited a relatively high WA DBRS Morningstar Issuance LTV of
77.6%, though it is estimated to improve to 69.1% through
stabilization. When the cut-off date balances were measured against
the DBRS Morningstar As-Is NCF, 26 loans, representing 78.9% of the
cut-off date pool balance, had a DBRS Morningstar As-Is DSCR below
1.00x, a threshold indicative of high default risk. Additionally,
the DBRS Morningstar Stabilized DSCR for 18 loans, representing
56.6% of the initial pool balance, was below 1.00x, a threshold
indicative of elevated refinance risk. The properties are often
transitioned with potential upside in cash flow. However, DBRS
Morningstar does not give full credit to the stabilization if there
are no holdbacks of if other loan structural features are
insufficient to support such treatment. Furthermore, even with the
structure provided, DBRS Morningstar generally does not assume the
assets will stabilize above market levels.

The Sponsor is ACRES Commercial Realty Corp. (NYSE:ACR). In July
2020, ACRES Capital Corp. (ACRES) through its subsidiary, ACRES
Capital, LLC, acquired the management agreement of ACRES Commercial
Realty Corp (formerly known as ExantasCapital Corp). ACRES is a
publicly traded commercial mortgage REIT focused on self-originated
commercial mortgage loans and other commercial real estate (CRE)
debt investments. It provides nationwide, middle-market commercial
real estate lending with a focus on multifamily, student-housing,
hospitality, office, and independent senior living properties in
the U.S.. The Sponsor has been an Issuer on 11 securitized CRE
financings totaling approximately $4.6 billion.

An affiliate of the sponsor, Retention Holder, will be acquiring
and holding 100% the first-loss position (including Class F Notes,
Class G Notes, and the Preferred Shares) on this transaction as an
eligible horizontal residual interest (EHRI). The Retention Holder
will retain the EHRI in accordance with the U.S. Credit Risk
Retention Rules. The Sponsor and the Retention Holder will both
agree and undertake in the EU/UK Risk Retention Letter to comply
with the EU/UK Risk Retention Requirements in accordance with the
terms of the EU/UK Risk Retention Letter. Collectively, the
retained notes and membership interests represent 15.9% of the
trust balance.

Twenty-three loans, representing 75.2% of the initial pool, are
backed by multifamily properties (65.7%), excluding student
housing, and self-storage properties (9.4%). These property types
have historically shown lower defaults and losses. Multifamily
properties benefit from staggered lease rollover and generally low
expense ratios compared with other property types. While revenue is
quick to decline in a downturn because of the short-term nature of
the leases, it is also quick to respond when the market improves.
Furthermore, the pool has limited office, retail, mixed-used, and
hospitality exposure with only eight loans, representing 17.7% of
the pool, backed by such property types. These property types have
experienced considerable disruption as a result of the coronavirus
pandemic with mandatory closures, stay-at-home orders, travel
restrictions, retail bankruptcies, and consumer shifts to online
purchasing.

The DBRS Morningstar Business Plan Scores (BPS) for loans DBRS
Morningstar analyzed ranged from 1.15 to 2.53, with an average of
1.90. On a scale of 1 to 5, a higher DBRS Morningstar BPS is
indicative of more risk in the sponsor's business plan.
Consideration is given to the anticipated lift at the property from
current performance, planned property improvements, sponsor
experience, projected time horizon, and overall complexity.
Compared with similar transactions, the subject has a relatively
low average BPS, which is indicative of lower risk. In addition,
the WA remaining fully extended term for the pool is 44 months,
which allows the sponsors time to execute their business plans
without risk of imminent maturity.

Twenty-two loans, comprising 73.7% of the initial trust balance,
represent acquisition financing wherein sponsors contributed cash
equity as a source of funding in conjunction with the mortgage
loan. The cash equity in the deal will incentivize the sponsors to
perform on the loan and protect their equity.

The majority of the floating-rate loans have purchased Libor rate
caps that range from 0.25% to 4.0% to protect against rising
interest rates through the duration of the loan term. In addition
to the fulfillment of certain minimum performance requirements,
exercise of any extension options would also require the repurchase
of interest rate cap protection through the duration of the
respectively exercised option.

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic continues to pose challenges and
risks to the CRE sector. While DBRS Morningstar expects multifamily
(65.7% of the pool) to fare better than most other property types,
the long-term effects on the general economy and consumer sentiment
are still unclear. DBRS Morningstar received coronavirus and
business plan updates for all loans in the pool, confirming that
all debt service payments have been received in full for the months
of January 2021, February 2021, March 2021, and April 2021.
Furthermore, no loans are in forbearance or other debt service
relief except for 16 Penn property and Cypress Crossing property,
which, combined, represent 4.08% of the initial trust balance. More
than half of the loans in the pool were originated after December
2020. Loans originated during the pandemic have, in general, taken
into consideration the risks associated with the pandemic into
their cash flow analyses. In addition, the majority of the loans in
this pool have recently completed appraisal reports reflecting the
appropriate values of properties during the pandemic.

The transaction is a managed collateralized loan obligation (CLO)
and includes one delayed-close loan and a 24-month reinvestment
period, which could result in negative credit migration and/or an
increased concentration profile over the life of the transaction.
The risk of negative migration is partially offset by the
eligibility criteria that outlines the DSCR, LTV, 16.0 Herfindahl
score minimum, property type, and loan size limitations for the
reinvestment assets. DBRS Morningstar has the ability to provide a
no-downgrade confirmation for new reinvestment loans and for
participation interests in loans the Issuer already owns a
participation interest if the interest to be acquired exceeds $5.0
million. DBRS Morningstar will analyze these loans before they come
into the pool and review them for potential ratings impact.

Sixteen loans, representing 46.8% of the pool, were originated in
2018 and 2019. In some cases, the original business plans have not
materialized as expected, significantly increasing the loans’
risk profile. Given the nature of the assets, DBRS Morningstar
sampled a large portion of the pool at 79.4% of the cut-off date
balance, or 21 of the 34 loans. This sample size is higher than the
typical sample for traditional conduit CMBS transactions. In
addition, DBRS Morningstar also sampled 11 of the 16 seasoned
loans, representing 36.4% of the pool balance, to evaluate the
current performance on these properties. Five of the seasoned loans
sampled have yet to reach stability but are maturing over the next
12 months and are at risk of not being able to meet the extension
requirements. For these loans, DBRS Morningstar applied minimal
upside credit and treated the as-stabilized NCF the same as the
as-is NCF to these loans (Westwood & Audobon, Goodfriend NY Self
Storage, Advenir at Park Boulevard, West Eleven Apartments, and
Stonelake 1-5). Some of these loans may receive short-term loan
extensions from the Issuer to facilitate the sale or refinance of
the properties. All seasoned loans were provided with updated
business plans and appraisal reports.

DBRS Morningstar has analyzed the loans to a stabilized cash flow
that is, in some instances, above the current in-place cash flow.
There is a possibility that the sponsors will not execute their
business plans as expected and that the higher stabilized cash flow
will not materialize during the loan term, particularly with the
ongoing coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the overall economy.
Failure to execute the business plan could result in a term default
or the inability to refinance the fully funded loan balance. DBRS
Morningstar made relatively conservative stabilization assumptions
and, in each instance, considered the business plan to be rational
and the future funding amounts to be sufficient to execute such
plans. In addition, DBRS Morningstar analyzes loss given default
(LGD) based on the DBRS Morningstar As-Is LTV assuming the loan is
fully funded.

The overall WA DBRS Morningstar As-Is DSCR of 0.76x and WA As-Is
LTV of 77.6% are generally reflective of high-leverage financing.
The DBRS Morningstar As-Is DSCR is based on the DBRS Morningstar
In-Place NCF and debt service calculated using a stressed interest
rate. The WA stressed rate used is 4.75%, which is greater than the
current WA interest rate of 3.61% (based on WA mortgage spread and
an assumed 0.11% one-month Libor index). When measured against the
DBRS Morningstar Stabilized NCF, the WA DBRS Morningstar
As-Stabilized DSCR is estimated to improve to 1.00x, suggesting the
properties are likely to have improved NCFs assuming completion of
the sponsor's business plan. DBRS Morningstar associates its LGD
based on the assets' as-is LTV and does not assume that the
stabilization plan and cash flow growth will ever materialize but
does account for the loan having been fully funded. DBRS
Morningstar's As-Stabilized LTV is expected to decrease to 69.1%.

All loans have floating interest rates and all but one loans are IO
during the initial loan term, creating interest rate risk should
interest rates increase. For the floating-rate loans, DBRS
Morningstar used the one-month Libor index, which is based on the
lower of a DBRS Morningstar stressed rate that corresponded to the
remaining fully extended term of the loans or the strike price of
the interest rate cap with the respective contractual loan spread
added to determine a stressed interest rate over the loan term.
Most loans have extension options, and, in order to qualify for
these options, the loans must meet minimum DSCR and LTV
requirements. All loans are short-term and, even with extension
options, have a fully extended loan term of five years maximum. The
majority of the floating-rate loans have purchased Libor rate caps
that range from 0.25% to 4.0% to protect against rising interest
rates through the duration of the loan term.

Because of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, DBRS Morningstar was
unable to perform site inspections on any of the properties in the
pool. As a result, DBRS Morningstar relied more heavily on
third-party reports, online data sources, and information provided
by the Issuer to determine the overall DBRS Morningstar property
quality assigned for each loan. Recent appraisal reports were
provided for all loans and contained property quality commentary
and photos. DBRS Morningstar made relatively conservative property
quality adjustments with only four loans (Skygarden, Advenir at
Park Boulevard, Chapel Hill Apartments, and 16 Penn), representing
a combined 14.3% of the pool balance, being modeled with Average +
property quality. These properties were recently built or
renovated. No loans received a property quality distinction of
Excellent.

Notes: All figures are in U.S dollars unless otherwise noted.



APEX CREDIT 2016: Moody's Hikes Rating on Class E-R Notes to B1
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to two classes of
CLO refinancing notes issued by Apex Credit CLO 2016 Ltd. (the
"Issuer").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$188,289,994 Class A-RR Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes Due
2028 (the "Class A-RR Notes"), Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$50,000,000 Class B-RR Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes Due
2028 (the "Class B-RR Notes"), Assigned Aaa (sf)

Additionally, Moody's has taken rating actions on the following
outstanding notes originally issued by the Issuer on November 27,
2018 (the "First Refinancing Date"):

US$27,000,000 Class C-R Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
2028 (the "Class C-R Notes"), Upgraded to Aa3 (sf); previously on
November 27, 2018 Assigned A2 (sf)

US$24,000,000 Class D-R Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
2028 (the "Class D-R Notes"), Upgraded to Baa2 (sf); previously on
August 13, 2020 Downgraded to Ba1 (sf)

US$20,000,000 Class E-R Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due
2028 (the "Class E-R Notes"), Upgraded to B1 (sf); previously on
August 13, 2020 Downgraded to B2 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks particularly those associated with the
CLO's portfolio and structure.

The Issuer is a cash flow collateralized loan obligation (CLO). The
issued notes are collateralized primarily by a portfolio of broadly
syndicated senior secured corporate loans.

Apex Credit Partners LLC (the "Manager") will continue to direct
the selection and disposition of the assets on behalf of the
Issuer.

The Issuer previously issued three other classes of secured notes
and two classes of subordinated notes, which will remain
outstanding.

In addition to the issuance of the Refinancing Notes, a variety of
other changes to transaction features will occur in connection with
the refinancing. These include: extensions of the non-call period
for the refinancing notes; changes to the definition of "Adjusted
Weighted Average Moody's Rating Factor"; updates to LIBOR
replacement provisions for the refinancing notes; and restriction
on reinvestment of principal proceeds.

Moody's rating actions on the Class C-R Notes, Class D-R Notes and
Class E-R Notes are primarily a result of the refinancing, which
increased excess spread available as credit enhancement to the
rated notes, and deleveraging of the senior notes, which increased
the transaction's over-collateralization (OC) ratios since July
2020.

The senior notes were paid down by approximately 23.05% or $56.4
million since July 2020. Based on the trustee's April 2021 report
[1], the OC ratios for the Class A/B, Class C, Class D and Class E
notes are reported at 130.97%, 119.88%, 111.49% and 105.34%,
respectively, versus July 2020 reported [2] levels of 126.09%,
115.51%, 107.39% and 101.37%, respectively. Moody's notes the
reported OC ratios in April do not factor the $53.5 million payment
to the senior notes on the April 27th payment date[3].

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations."

The key model inputs Moody's used in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, weighted average spread, diversity
score and weighted average recovery rate, are based on its
published methodology and could differ from the trustee's reported
numbers. For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following
base-case assumptions:

Performing par and principal proceeds balance: $332,551,809

Defaulted par: $5,923,680

Diversity Score: 78

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 3069

Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for LIBOR floors):
3.66%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 10.51%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.23%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 4.22 years

Par haircut in OC tests and interest diversion test: 1.64%

In consideration of the current high uncertainties around the
global economy, and the ultimate performance of the CLO portfolio,
Moody's conducted a number of additional sensitivity analyses
representing a range of outcomes that could diverge, both to the
downside and the upside, from Moody's base case. Some of the
additional scenarios that Moody's considered in its analysis of the
transaction include, among others: additional near-term defaults of
companies facing liquidity pressure; sensitivity analysis on
deteriorating credit quality due to a large exposure to loans with
negative outlook, and a lower recovery rate assumption on defaulted
assets to reflect declining loan recovery rate expectations.

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of corporate assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in the US economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its
ESG framework, given the substantial implications for public health
and safety.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the rated notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the rated notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the rated notes.


ARBOR REALTY 2018-FL1: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class F Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed the ratings of the Floating-Rate Notes (the
Notes) issued by Arbor Realty Commercial Real Estate Notes
2018-FL1, Ltd. (the Issuer) as follows:

-- Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes at AAA (sf)
-- Class B Secured Floating Rate Notes at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C Secured Floating Rate Notes at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D Secured Floating Rate Notes at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class E Floating Rate Notes at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class F Floating Rate Notes at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which remains generally in line with DBRS
Morningstar's expectations. The pool currently consists of 44
floating-rate loans totaling $529.5 million, secured by multifamily
and commercial properties. At issuance, the pool consisted of 28
loans totaling $494.4 million. The transaction is structured with
an initial 36-month replacement period whereby the Issuer can
substitute collateral in the pool, subject to certain Eligibility
Criteria, including the rating agency condition by DBRS
Morningstar. As of the April 2021 remittance, there remains $30.5
million in equity that the Issuer can deploy to originate
additional loans. The transaction pays sequentially after the
replacement period ends.

As of the April 2021 remittance, the pool composition consists of
loans secured by 39 multifamily properties, two office properties,
and three healthcare properties. Most loans have a maximum initial
term of two or three years, with extension options generally
available to borrowers, subject to criteria. Most of the collateral
properties are currently cash-flowing assets in a period of
transition with viable plans and loan structures in place to
facilitate stabilization and value growth. All of the loans are
structured with cash management in place at origination and are
also structured with reserves, including several loans that were
structured with an initial operating, interest and renovation
reserve.

The Issuer, Servicer, Mortgage Loan Seller, and Advancing Agent are
related parties and nonrated entities. Arbor Realty SR, Inc.
(Arbor) holds the unrated 11.8% equity piece as Preferred Shares in
the transaction. Given the potential for disruptions to business
plan executions amid the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic,
DBRS Morningstar is monitoring the impact on loans in the subject
transaction and has requested information on any developments from
Arbor as part of this review. As of the April 2021 remittance, four
loans are less than 30 days delinquent and no loans are in special
servicing. Arbor has advised that no extended periods of
delinquency are expected at this time.

One loan, 331 Park Avenue South, represents 6.7% of the current
trust balance and is secured by a 12-story, mixed-use property
located in the Midtown South submarket of Manhattan. The collateral
consists of both traditional office and retail space, and the
sponsor's original business plan included converting the office
portion of the property into a shared workspace format. However,
that plan has since shifted and the leasing efforts have since
targeted traditional office users. In addition, the retail
portion's slated restaurant tenant, which was initially anticipated
to open in early 2020, has since delayed the opening until late
2021 due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. The overall occupancy
rate was 40.0% as of January 2020 and had increased to 50.0% as of
December 2020. Although the lease-up of the property has been
delayed amid the pandemic, the sponsor expects traction to improve
as the social distancing measures continue to ease and New York and
the country overall move toward a quasi-normal state of affairs
later in 2021.

The second-largest loan in the pool, Preston Hollow II, represents
6.9% of the current trust balance and is secured by a 526-unit
Class A multifamily complex and 24,000 square feet (sf) of retail
space located in Dallas, Texas. The subject consists of three
buildings: The Preston, an ultra-luxury building; The Royal, aimed
at a young professional demographic; and The Royalton, which is
generally intended for a younger demographic and has a
lower-quality finish. The collateral is part of a larger
development, Preston Hollow Village, which will consist of the
subject as well as office, townhomes, multifamily properties, and
retail space, with the overall development expected to be completed
in 2022. The subject property is fully finished and received its
final certificates of occupancy. At closing, the loan had a $40.0
million renovation reserve, a $1.9 million operating reserve, and a
$5.7 million interest reserve. As of the Q4 2020 update, the
borrower has drawn the bulk of the renovation and operating
reserves, and the interest reserve remains fully intact. As of
February 2021, the collateral was 91.0% occupied at an average
rental rate of $2,321 per unit, which is below the appraiser's
stabilized estimate of $2,771 per unit; however, the borrower does
believe that once the larger development is complete, stabilized
rents should increase to appraiser's estimate. The retail portion
of the collateral is 62.0% occupied at an average rental rate of
$42.26 psf with a tenant mix focused on restaurants to serve the
surrounding residential area.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



AVIS BUDGET 2021-1: Moody's Assigns Ba2 Rating to Class D Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings of Aaa (sf) to the
Series 2021-1 Class A fixed rate Rental Car Asset Backed Notes, A2
(sf) to the Series 2021-1 Class B fixed rate Rental Car Asset
Backed Notes, Baa3 (sf) to the Series 2021-1 Class C fixed rate
Rental Car Asset Backed Notes, and Ba2 (sf) to the Series 2021-1
Class D fixed rate Rental Car Asset Backed Notes (together with the
Class A Notes, the Class B Notes and the Class C Notes, the Series
2021-1 Notes) issued by Avis Budget Rental Car Funding (AESOP) LLC
(the issuer). The Series 2021-1 Notes have an expected final
maturity of approximately 62 months. The issuer is an indirect
subsidiary of the sponsor, Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC (ABCR, B2
negative). ABCR is a subsidiary of Avis Budget Group, Inc. ABCR is
the owner and operator of Avis Rent A Car System, LLC (Avis),
Budget Rent A Car System, Inc. (Budget), Zipcar, Inc, Payless Car
Rental, Inc. (Payless) and Budget Truck Rental LLC (Budget Truck).

Moody's also announced that the issuance of the Series 2021-1
Notes, along with the implementation of a minimum depreciation
schedule that will be based on a vehicle's aging for vehicles aged
24+ months, in and of themselves and at this time, will not result
in a reduction, withdrawal, or placement under review for possible
downgrade of any of the ratings currently assigned to the
outstanding series of notes issued by the issuer.

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: Avis Budget Rental Car Funding (AESOP) LLC, Series 2021-1

Series 2021-1 Rental Car Asset Backed Notes, Class A, Definitive
Rating Assigned Aaa (sf)

Series 2021-1 Rental Car Asset Backed Notes, Class B, Definitive
Rating Assigned A2 (sf)

Series 2021-1 Rental Car Asset Backed Notes, Class C, Definitive
Rating Assigned Baa3 (sf)

Series 2021-1 Rental Car Asset Backed Notes, Class D, Definitive
Rating Assigned Ba2 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The definitive ratings on the Series 2021-1 Notes are based on (1)
the credit quality of the collateral in the form of rental fleet
vehicles, which ABCR uses in its rental car business, (2) the
credit quality of ABCR as the primary lessee and as guarantor under
the operating lease, (3) the track-record and expertise of ABCR as
sponsor and administrator, (4) the available credit enhancement,
which consists of subordination and over- collateralization, (5)
minimum liquidity in the form of cash and/or a letter of credit,
and (6) the transaction's legal structure. The ratings also reflect
(1) a decrease in Moody's mean non-program haircut assumption upon
sponsor default, to 19% from 25%, supported by the strength in used
vehicle prices, and (2) consideration of the vastly improved rental
car market conditions.

The total credit enhancement requirement for the Series 2021-1
Notes is dynamic, and determined as the sum of (1) 5.00% for
vehicles subject to a guaranteed depreciation or repurchase program
from eligible manufacturers (program vehicles) rated at least Baa3
by Moody's, (2) 8.5% for all other program vehicles, and (3) 12.60%
for non-program (risk) vehicles, in each case, as a percentage of
the outstanding note balance. Dynamic enhancement buckets are lower
compared to other series due to the addition of Class D, but
overall blended credit enhancement is comparable to prior series.
Consequently, the actual required amount of credit enhancement will
fluctuate based on the mix of vehicles in the securitized fleet. As
in prior issuances, the transaction documents stipulate that the
required total enhancement includes a minimum portion which is
liquid (in cash and/or a letter of credit), sized as a percentage
of the outstanding note balance, rather than fleet vehicles. The
Class A Notes also benefit from subordination provided by the Class
B, C and D Notes and represent approximately 27.0% of the
outstanding balance of the Series 2021-1 Notes. The Class B Notes
benefit from subordination provided by the Class C and D Notes and
represent approximately 18.0% of the outstanding balance of the
Series 2021-1 Notes. The Class C Notes benefit from subordination
provided by the Class D Notes and represent approximately 12.0% of
the outstanding Balance of the Series 2021-1 Notes.

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of corporate assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in US economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under
Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety.

The assumptions Moody's applied in the analysis of this
transaction:

Risk of sponsor default: Moody's assumed a 60% decrease in the
probability of default (from Moody's idealized default probability
tables) implied by the B2 rating of the sponsor. Moody's continues
to assume a 75% probability that ABCR would affirm its lease
payment obligations in the event of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy,
informed by pandemic-driven events that affected the rental car
market (such as the drastic and sudden decline in rental car demand
and the resulting high lease payments for a vastly underutilized
fleet). The assumed high likelihood of lease acceptance recognizes
the strategic importance of the ABS financing platform to ABCR's
operation. In the event of a bankruptcy, ABCR would be more likely
to reorganize under a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, as it would
likely realize more value as an ongoing business concern than it
would if it were to liquidate its assets under a Chapter 7 filing.
Furthermore, given the sponsor's competitive position within the
industry and the size of its securitized fleet relative to its
overall fleet, the sponsor is likely to affirm its lease payment
obligations in order to retain the use of the fleet and stay in
business. Moody's arrives at the 60% decrease assuming an 80%
probability Avis would reorganize under a Chapter 11 bankruptcy and
a 75% probability (90% assumed previously) Avis would affirm its
lease payment obligations in the event of Chapter 11.

Disposal value of the fleet: Moody's assumed the following haircuts
to the net book value (NBV) of the vehicle fleet:

Non-Program Haircut upon Sponsor Default -- Mean: 19%

Non-Program Haircut upon Sponsor Default -- Standard Deviation: 6%

Fixed Program Haircut upon Sponsor Default: 10%

Additional Fixed Non-Program Haircut upon Manufacturer Default:
20%

Fleet composition -- Moody's assumed the following fleet
composition (based on NBV of vehicle fleet):

Non-program Vehicles: 90%

Program Vehicles: 10%

Non-program Manufacturer Concentration (percentage, number of
manufacturers, assumed rating):

Aa/A Profile: 20%, 2, A3

Baa Profile: 60%, 3, Baa3

Ba/B Profile: 20%, 1, B1

Program Manufacturer Concentration (percentage, number of
manufacturers, assumed rating):

Aa/A Profile: 0%, 0, A3

Baa Profile: 80%, 2, Baa3

Ba/B Profile: 20%, 1, B1

Manufacturer Receivables: 0%; receivables distributed in the same
proportion as the program fleet (Program Manufacturer Concentration
and Manufacturer Receivables together should add up to 100%)

Correlation: Moody's applied the following correlation
assumptions:

Correlation among the sponsor and the vehicle manufacturers: 10%

Correlation among all vehicle manufacturers: 25%

Default risk horizon -- Moody's assumed the following default risk
horizon:

Sponsor: 5 years

Manufacturers: 1 year

A fixed set of time horizon assumptions, regardless of the
remaining term of the transaction, is used when considering sponsor
and manufacturer default probabilities and the expected loss of the
related liabilities, which simplifies Moody's modeling approach
using a standard set of benchmark horizons.

Detailed application of the assumptions are provided in the
methodology.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Rental Fleet Securitizations" published in July
2020.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Moody's could upgrade the ratings of the Series 2021-1 Notes, as
applicable if, among other things, (1) the credit quality of the
lessee improves, (2) the likelihood of the transaction's sponsor
defaulting on its lease payments were to decrease, and (3)
assumptions of the credit quality of the pool of vehicles
collateralizing the transaction were to strengthen, as reflected by
a stronger mix of program and non-program vehicles and stronger
credit quality of vehicle manufacturers.

Down

Moody's could downgrade the ratings of the Series 2021-1 Notes if,
among other things, (1) the credit quality of the lessee weakens,
(2) the likelihood of the transaction's sponsor defaulting on its
lease payments were to increase, (3) the likelihood of the sponsor
accepting its lease payment obligation in its entirety in the event
of a Chapter 11 were to decrease and (4) assumptions of the credit
quality of the pool of vehicles collateralizing the transaction
were to weaken, as reflected by a weaker mix of program and
non-program vehicles and weaker credit quality of vehicle
manufacturers.


BAIN CAPITAL 2017-1: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating on Class F Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to the class A-1-R, A-2-R,
B-R, and C-1-R replacement notes from Bain Capital Credit CLO
2017-1 Ltd., a CLO originally issued in July 2017 managed by Bain
Capital Credit CLO Advisers L.P., a subsidiary of Bain Capital.

The replacement notes were issued via a supplemental indenture. S&P
withdrew its ratings on the original class A-1, B, and C-1 notes
following their full redemption. S&P did not rate the original
class A-2 notes and now rate the replacement class A-2-R notes. S&P
also affirmed its ratings on the outstanding class C-2, D, E, and F
notes, which were not subject to this refinancing.

S&P said, "Our review of this transaction included a cash flow
analysis, based on the portfolio and transaction as reflected in
the trustee report, to estimate future performance. In line with
our criteria, our cash flow scenarios applied forward-looking
assumptions on the expected timing and pattern of defaults, and
recoveries upon default, under various interest rate and
macroeconomic scenarios. Our analysis also considered the
transaction's ability to pay timely interest or ultimate principal,
or both, to each of the rated tranches, as well as qualitative
factors.

"The ratings reflect our view of the credit support available to
the refinanced notes after examining the new and lower spreads,
which reduce the transaction's overall cost of funding.

"We will continue to review whether the ratings on the notes remain
consistent, in our view, with the credit enhancement available to
support them, and take rating actions as we deem necessary."

  Ratings Assigned

  Bain Capital Credit CLO 2017-1 Ltd.

  Class A-1-R, $298.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-2-R, $19.50 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B-R, $65.50 million: AA (sf)
  Class C-1-R, $18.73 million: A (sf)

  Ratings Affirmed

  Bain Capital Credit CLO 2017-1 Ltd.

  Class C-2, $9.48 million: A (sf)
  Class D, $28.00 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class E, $20.60 million: B+ (sf)
  Class F, $7.00 million: B- (sf)

  Ratings Withdrawn

  Bain Capital Credit CLO 2017-1 Ltd.

  Class A-1: to NR from AAA (sf)
  Class B: to NR from AA (sf)
  Class C-1: to NR from A (sf)

  NR--Not rated.



BANCORP COMMERCIAL 2018-CRE4: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on F Certs
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited upgraded its ratings on three classes of Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2018-CRE4 issued by The
Bancorp Commercial Mortgage 2018-CRE4 Trust as follows:

-- Class B to AAA (sf) from AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C to AA (sf) from A (low) (sf)
-- Class D to A (sf) from BBB (low) (sf)

In addition, DBRS Morningstar confirmed its ratings on the three
remaining classes as follows:

-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class E at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at B (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating upgrades generally reflect the significant paydowns to
the transaction since issuance as well as the stable outlook for
the remaining loans in the pool. In additional, there is a $30.7
million nonrated class in the first-loss position that further
enhances credit support throughout the stack.

At issuance, the collateral consisted of 45 floating-rate mortgages
secured by 50 transitional properties totaling $341.0 million based
on the trust cut-off balances ($515.2 million including funded pari
passu participation interests) and $568.8 million based on fully
funded loan amounts. As of the April 2021 remittance, 20 loans
remain in the pool and there has been a collateral reduction of
54.0% since issuance. As of April 2021, the servicer reported all
future funding has been funded with the exception of $366,000 for
Butterfield Office Plaza (Prospectus ID#17). The loans were
structured with three-year initial terms that are scheduled to
mature by September 2021, and all loans feature two one-year
extension options that are subject to performance hurdles.

As of the April 2021 remittance, four loans, representing 3.2% of
the pool, are in special servicing and another 12 loans,
representing 73.3% of the pool, are on the servicer’s watchlist,
primarily being monitored for upcoming maturities and low cash
flow. In general, probability of default (POD) penalties were
applied to increase the expected loss for these loans in the
analysis for this review. Although some of these loans have
characteristics suggesting increased risks from issuance, no
significant losses are expected, based on information known as of
this review.

The Staybridge Suites Conversion loan (Prospectus ID#36; 1.6% of
the pool) is the largest loan in special servicing. It is secured
by a 224-key limited-service hotel in Kissimmee, Florida, and was
transferred to special servicing in April 2020 because of payment
default. The borrower submitted a relief request, citing hardship
amid the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The loan was
originally scheduled to mature in October 2020 and, as part of the
loan modification approved by the special servicer, a one-year
extension was granted along with a short-term forbearance. The
special servicer obtained an updated appraisal dated July 2020 that
showed an as-is value of $21.3 million, up from $13.3 million at
issuance and well in excess of the fully funded loan balance of
$15.5 million. As of the April 2021 remittance, the loan was
reported current and the special servicer's commentary notes the
loan remains in special servicing for monitoring to ensure the
terms of the loan modification are being met. As of January and
February 2021, the collateral reported an occupancy rate of 43.6%
and 45.3%, respectively. Although the challenges in depressed
occupancy rates are expected to persist through the near to medium
term, DBRS Morningstar notes the value improvement from issuance
and the sponsor's apparent commitment to the property as factors
for consideration as well.

Two other loans, Hotel Indigo Detroit (Prospectus ID#5, 9.5% of the
pool) and DoubleTree Columbia (Prospectus ID#16, 5.9% of the pool),
were granted forbearances and loan modifications as a result of
challenges arising from the coronavirus pandemic. Hotel Indigo
Detroit, secured by a 241-key lodging property in the Detroit
central business district, was added to the servicer’s watchlist
for low debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) and coronavirus relief.
The loan was modified in July 2020 with the special servicer
approving a forbearance of six months from June 2020 through
November 2020, in addition to a maturity extension to May 2022. The
borrower requested a second forbearance in December 2020, which was
approved through March 2021. Post-forbearance debt service payments
commenced in April 2021. The borrower remains optimistic that
performance will improve following a wider distribution of vaccines
and the reopening of restaurants and sporting venues.

DoubleTree Columbia, secured by a 152-key, full-service hotel in
Columbia, Maryland, was added to the servicer’s watchlist for low
DSCR and coronavirus relief. The loan previously performed well
with a DSCR of 1.78 times (x) in 2019 but struggled in 2020 due to
the pandemic. The special servicer approved a loan modification
that deferred various reserve payments from April 2020 to September
2020. Reserve payments were to be repaid by December 2020 and the
servicer's commentary states that all loan payments are current and
all deferred payments have been repaid. DBRS Morningstar increased
the POD for these loans as part of the review to reflect the
increased default risk for each of these stressed loans.

DBRS Morningstar materially deviated from its North American CMBS
Insight Model when determining the ratings assigned to Classes E
and F, as the quantitative results suggested a higher rating on the
classes. The material deviations are warranted given the uncertain
loan-level event risk with the loans in special servicing and the
potential for adverse selection as loans continue to pay off.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



BARINGS CLO 2019-III: Moody's Assigns Ba3 Rating to Cl. E-R Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to three classes of
CLO refinancing notes issued by Barings CLO Ltd. 2019-III (the
"Issuer").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$231,000,000 Class A-1-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes Due
2031 (the "Class A-1-R Notes"), Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$25,000,000 Class A-2-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes Due
2031 (the "Class A-2-R Notes"), Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$17,750,000 Class E-R Secured Deferrable Mezzanine Floating Rate
Notes Due 2031 (the "Class E-R Notes"), Assigned Ba3 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks particularly those associated with the
CLO's portfolio and structure.

The Issuer is a managed cash flow collateralized loan obligation
(CLO). The issued notes are collateralized primarily by a portfolio
of broadly syndicated senior secured corporate loans.

Barings LLC (the "Manager") will direct the selection, acquisition
and disposition of the assets on behalf of the Issuer and may
engage in trading activity, including discretionary trading, during
the transaction's remaining reinvestment period.

The Issuer previously issued three other classes of secured notes
and one class of subordinated notes, which will remain
outstanding.

In addition to the issuance of the Refinancing Notes, the other
classes of secured notes and additional subordinated notes, a
variety of other changes to transaction features will occur in
connection with the refinancing. These include: changes to weighted
average life (WAL) test; the inclusion of alternative benchmark
replacement provisions; amendment to the Minimum Diversity
Score/Maximum Rating/Minimum Spread Matrix; changes to
concentration limitations to include senior secured bonds, and
changes to the definition of Adjusted Weighted Average Rating
Factor.

Moody's rating actions on the Class A-1-R Notes, Class A-2-R Notes,
and Class E-R Notes are primarily a result of the refinancing,
which increases excess spread available as credit enhancement to
the rated notes.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations."

The key model inputs Moody's used in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score and weighted
average recovery rate, are based on its published methodology and
could differ from the trustee's reported numbers. For modeling
purposes, Moody's used the following base-case assumptions:

Performing par and principal proceeds balance: $398,062,186

Defaulted par: $0

Diversity Score: 71

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 3300

Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for LIBOR floors):
3.34%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 48.15%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 8.01 years

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of corporate assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in the US economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its
ESG framework, given the substantial implications for public health
and safety.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the rated notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the rated notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the rated notes.


BBCMS MORTGAGE 2020-C7: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on Class F Certs
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed its ratings on the Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2020-C7 issued by BBCMS Mortgage
Trust 2020-C7 Trust as follows:

-- Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-3 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-4 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-5 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-SB at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-B at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class X-E at BB (high) (sf)
-- Class E at BB (sf)
-- Class X-F at B (high) (sf)
-- Class F at B (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction. At issuance, the transaction consisted of 49
fixed-rates loans secured by 153 commercial and multifamily
properties with a trust balance of $807.8 million. According to the
April 2021 remittance, all loans remain in the pool and there has
been negligible amortization to date. The transaction is
concentrated by property type as 10 loans, representing 26.1% of
the current trust balance, are secured by office collateral, while
the second-largest concentration comprises nine loans, representing
25.3% of the current trust balance, secured by multifamily
collateral. The transaction does not include any loans secured by
lodging properties and only six loans, representing 6.1% of the
pool, are secured by retail properties. Five loans, representing
13.5% of the pool, are on the servicer's watchlist. These loans are
being monitored primarily for low debt service coverage ratios
(DSCR).

At issuance, DBRS Morningstar shadow rated six loans investment
grade, including Parkmerced (Prospectus ID#1, 7.4% of the pool),
525 Market Street (Prospectus ID#2, 7.4% of the pool), The Cove at
Tiburon (Prospectus ID#3, 6.2% of the pool), Acuity Portfolio
(Prospectus ID#8, 5.0% of the pool), F5 Tower (Prospectus ID#8,
4.9% of the pool), and 650 Madison Avenue (Prospectus ID#13, 2.7%
of the pool). DBRS Morningstar maintained the shadow ratings on all
six loans with this review.

The Parkmerced loan, secured by a 3,165-unit apartment complex in
San Francisco was added to the watchlist in March 2021 for declines
in occupancy and cash flow. As of the Q3 2020 financials, the loan
reported a DSCR of 0.85 times and an occupancy rate of 75%. The
property was 94.3% occupied at issuance and is well located near
San Francisco State University, with downtown San Francisco to the
northeast and Silicon Valley to the south. According to Reis, the
West San Francisco submarket reported a Q1 2021 vacancy rate of
1.7% and is expected to increase marginally over the next five
years. At issuance, management was beginning a strategic shift from
a rental residence to a modern, higher-rent property that can tap
into the affluent demographic of the city as leases roll. DBRS
Morningstar views the occupancy decline as a temporary event given
the gradual shift to a higher-rent property and the submarket's
tight vacancy rates. DBRS Morningstar maintained the
investment-grade shadow rating as part of this review.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



BDS 2021-FL7: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
notes to be issued by BDS 2021-FL7 Ltd.:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

Coronavirus Overview

With regard to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the
magnitude and extent of performance stress posed to global
structured finance transactions remains highly uncertain. This
considers the fiscal and monetary policy measures and statutory law
changes that have already been implemented or will be implemented
to soften the impact of the crisis on global economies. Some
regions, jurisdictions, and asset classes are, however, feeling
more immediate effects. Accordingly, DBRS Morningstar may apply
additional short-term stresses to its rating analysis. For example,
DBRS Morningstar may front-load default expectations and/or assess
the liquidity position of a structured finance transaction with
more stressful operational risk and/or cash flow timing
considerations.

The initial collateral consists of 22 floating-rate mortgages
secured by 22 mostly transitional properties with a cut-off balance
of $536.5 million, excluding approximately $59.3 million of future
funding commitments. In addition, the transaction has a Ramp-Up
Acquisition Period from the sixth payment date during which the
Issuer may use $63.5 million of funds deposited into the unused
proceeds account to acquire additional eligible multifamily loans,
subject to the Eligibility Criteria, resulting in a target pool
balance of $600.0 million. As of May 11, 2021, of the 22 loans,
there are two unclosed or delayed-close loans, representing 14.4%
of the trust balance: Retreat at Waterside (Prospectus ID#2),
representing 7.9% of the trust balance, and Nottingham Village
(Prospectus ID#6), representing 6.4% of the trust balance. If a
delayed-close loan is not expected to close or fund prior to the
purchase termination date, the expected purchase price will be
credited to the unused proceeds amount to be used by the Issuer to
acquire ramp-up mortgage assets during the Ramp-Up Acquisition
Period. The Eligibility Criteria indicates that all loans acquired
within the Ramp-Up Acquisition Period must be secured by
multifamily properties. Most loans are in a period of transition,
with plans to stabilize and improve the asset value. During the
Reinvestment Period, the Issuer may acquire future funding
commitments and additional eligible loans subject to the
Eligibility Criteria. The transaction stipulates a $1.0 million
threshold on companion participation interest acquisitions before a
rating agency confirmation is required if there is already a
participation or note of the underlying loan in the trust.

The loans are mostly secured by currently cash flowing assets, many
of which are in a period of transition with plans to stabilize and
improve the asset value. In total, 19 loans, representing 86.6% of
the pool, have remaining future funding participation totaling
$59.3 million, which the Issuer may acquire in the future.

For the floating-rate loans, DBRS Morningstar used the one-month
Libor index, which is based on the lower of a DBRS Morningstar
stressed rate that corresponded to the remaining fully extended
term of the loans or the strike price of the interest rate cap with
the respective contractual loan spread added to determine a
stressed interest rate over the loan term. When the cut-off
balances were measured against the DBRS Morningstar As-Is Net Cash
Flow (NCF), 15 loans, comprising 63.1% of the initial pool, had a
DBRS Morningstar As-Is Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) below
1.00 times (x), a threshold indicative of default risk. However,
the DBRS Morningstar Stabilized DSCRs for only three loans,
representing 9.6% of the initial pool balance, are below 1.00x. The
properties are often transitioning with potential upside in cash
flow; however, DBRS Morningstar does not give full credit to the
stabilization if there are no holdbacks or if other loan structural
features in place are insufficient to support such treatment.
Furthermore, even with the structure provided, DBRS Morningstar
generally does not assume the assets to stabilize above market
levels. The transaction will have a sequential-pay structure.

The pool consists almost entirely of multifamily assets (95.4% of
the mortgage asset cut-off date balance consists of apartments and
3.5% consists of one manufactured housing community property).
Historically, multifamily properties have defaulted at much lower
rates than the overall commercial mortgage-backed securities
universe. The one industrial asset in the pool represents 1.1% of
the mortgage asset cut-off date balance.

As no loans in the pool were originated prior to the onset of the
coronavirus pandemic, the weighted-average (WA) remaining fully
extended term is 57 months, which gives the sponsor enough time to
execute its business plans without risk of imminent maturity.

Based on the initial pool balances, the overall WA DBRS Morningstar
As-Is DSCR of 0.90x and WA As-Is Loan-to-Value (LTV) of 84.8%
generally reflect high-leverage financing. When measured against
the DBRS Morningstar Stabilized NCF, the WA DBRS Morningstar DSCR
is estimated to improve to 1.22x, suggesting that the properties
are likely to have improved NCFs once the sponsor’s business plan
has been implemented.

The transaction is managed and includes a ramp-up component and
reinvestment period, which could result in negative credit
migration and/or an increased concentration profile over the life
of the transaction. The risk of negative migration is partially
offset by Eligibility Criteria (detailed in transaction documents)
that outline DSCR, LTV, Herfindahl score minimum, minimum
multifamily property type requirement for 80% of the pool, and loan
size limitations for ramp and reinvestment assets. Furthermore,
multifamily assets are the only property type allowed to be
acquired during the ramp-up period. DBRS Morningstar accounted for
the uncertainty introduced by the six-month ramp-up period by
running a ramp scenario that simulates the potential negative
credit migration in the transaction, based on the eligibility
criteria. As a result, the ramp component has a higher expected
loss than the WA pre-ramp pool expected loss. Furthermore, the ramp
loans may only be collateralized by multifamily properties, which
is a more favorable property type.

DBRS Morningstar has analyzed the loans to a stabilized cash flow
that is, in some instances, above the in-place cash flow. It is
possible that the sponsor will not successfully execute its
business plans and that the higher stabilized cash flow will not
materialize during the loan term, particularly with the ongoing
coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the overall economy. A
sponsor's failure to execute the business plan could result in a
term default or the inability to refinance the fully funded loan
balance. DBRS Morningstar sampled a large portion of the loans,
representing 81.1% of the pool cut-off date balance. DBRS
Morningstar made relatively conservative stabilization assumptions
and, in each instance, considered the business plan to be rational
and the loan structure to be sufficient to execute such plans. In
addition, DBRS Morningstar analyzes loss given default based on the
as-is credit metrics, assuming the loan is fully funded with no NCF
or value upside.

One of the sampled loans, comprising 6.3% of the pool balance, was
analyzed with Weak sponsorship strengths. The Nottingham Village
loan is among the pool's 10 largest loans. DBRS Morningstar applied
a probability of default penalty to the loan analyzed with Weak
sponsorship strength.

All 22 loans have floating interest rates, are interest only during
the original term and through all extension options, and have
original terms of 36 months to 60 months, creating interest rate
risk. All loans are short term and, even with extension options,
they have a fully extended maximum loan term of five years. For the
floating-rate loans, DBRS Morningstar used the one-month Libor
index, which is based on the lower of a DBRS Morningstar stressed
rate that corresponded to the remaining fully extended term of the
loans or the strike price of the interest rate cap with the
respective contractual loan spread added to determine a stressed
interest rate over the loan term.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



BENCHMARK 2020-IG3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on 825S-D Certs
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. confirmed its ratings on the Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2020-IG3 issued by Benchmark
2020-IG3 Mortgage Trust as follows:

-- Class A2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A3 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A4 at AAA (sf)
-- Class ASB at AAA (sf)
-- Class AS at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class XA at AAA (sf)

-- Class 825S-A at A (low) (sf)
-- Class 825S-B at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class 825S-C at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class 825S-D at B (low) (sf)

-- Class T333-A at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class T333-B at A (low) (sf)
-- Class T333-C at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class T333-D at BB (high) (sf)

-- Class BX-A at A (low) (sf)
-- Class BX-B at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class BX-C at BB (high) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which remains in line with DBRS Morningstar's
expectations. The transaction is a pooled securitization of 21
fixed-rate, noncontrolling (with the exception of 1501 Broadway)
pari passu senior notes with an aggregate cut-off pooled balance of
$608.5 million. The collateral consists of nine mortgage loans
(considering the Chase Center Tower I/II loans are crossed) across
144 properties, with significant concentrations in California
(seven properties; 48.1% of the pool by loan balance), New York
(four properties; 17.7% of the pool), and Washington (one property;
13.0% of the pool).

Classes 825S-A, 825S-B, 825S-C, and 825S-D are loan-specific
certificates associated with the 825 South Hill loan. Classes
T333-A, T333-B, T333-C, and T333-D are loan-specific certificates
associated with the Tower 333 loan. Classes BX-A, BX-B, and BX-C
are loan-specific certificates associated with the BX Industrial
Portfolio loan.

The pool benefits from a high concentration of investment-grade
assets. All nine of the loans that serve as the collateral for the
pooled component of the transaction are shadow-rated investment
grade and exhibit investment-grade credit characteristics on a
stand-alone basis. The weighted-average credit profile of the
underlying collateral is approximately A (sf)/A (low) (sf).

The deal is very young in its lifecycle and most loans have not yet
reported meaningful financials. As of the April 2021 remittance
report, the servicer is monitoring four loans totaling 34.2% of the
pool balance on its watchlist. The Moffett Towers Buildings A, B,
and C loan is the largest loan on the watchlist and represents
13.2% of the pool balance. This 951,498-square-foot Class A office
property is in Sunnyvale, California, and is 86% leased to Google
through 2030. Comcast is the second-largest tenant, representing
12% of the gross leasable area on a lease through 2027. While
awaiting full-year financials, the servicer projected a drop in the
2020 debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) to 1.28 times (x) based on
the year-to-date September 2020 financials compared with the
issuer's underwritten level of 2.09x; however, this is not
unexpected as Google had staggered lease commencement dates
throughout 2020. The 825 South Hill loan, which represents 9.9% of
the pool balance, is backed by a 498-unit newly constructed
multifamily building in Los Angeles. As of December 2020, the DSCR
was 0.80x compared with the issuer’s underwritten level of 1.27x.
However, the building opened in 2019 and has not had sufficient
time to reach stabilization as the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
pandemic began in early 2020. In spite of this, occupancy reached
93% as of December 2020, which is above the issuer's expectation of
88% and speaks to the desirability of the building. Finally, the
Chase Center Towers I/II loans are being monitored for a
nonperformance matter as the borrower is working to complete
required property repairs that were outlined in the loan agreement
and funded in reserve accounts when the loan closed.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



BLUEMOUNTAIN XXXI: S&P Assigns Prelim BB-(sf) Rating on E Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to BlueMountain
CLO XXXI Ltd.'s floating-rate notes.

The note issuance is a CLO securitization governed by investment
criteria and backed by primarily broadly syndicated
speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' and lower) senior secured term
loans. The transaction is managed by Assured Investment Management
LLC, a subsidiary of Assured Guaranty.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of May 20,
2021. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings reflect S&P's view of:

-- The diversification of the collateral pool;

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization;

-- The experience of the collateral management team, which can
affect the performance of the rated notes through collateral
selection, ongoing portfolio management, and trading; and

-- The transaction's legal structure, which is expected to be
bankruptcy remote.

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  BlueMountain CLO XXXI Ltd./BlueMountain CLO XXXI LLC

  Class A-1, $248.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-2, $8.00 million: Not rated
  Class B, $48.00 million: AA (sf)
  Class C, $24.00 million: A (sf)
  Class D, $22.00 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class E, $16.80 million: BB- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $40.50 million: Not rated



BPR TRUST 2021-WILL: Moody's Gives (P)Ba3 Rating to Cl. HRR Certs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to six
classes of CMBS securities, issued by BPR Trust 2021-WILL,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2021-WILL:

Cl. A, Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

Cl. B, Assigned (P)Aa3 (sf)

Cl. C, Assigned (P)A3 (sf)

Cl. D, Assigned (P)Baa3 (sf)

Cl. E, Assigned (P)Ba2 (sf)

Cl. HRR, Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The certificates are collateralized by a single, $155.0 million
floating-rate, amortizing loan secured by the borrower's fee
interests in Willowbrook Mall, a super-regional mall located in
Houston, TX. The collateral for the loan consists of a 536,186
square foot portion of the 1.52 million SF single-story, enclosed
mall. Moody's ratings are based on the credit quality of the loans
and the strength of the securitization structure.

Moody's approach to rating this transaction involved the
application of Moody's Large Loan and Single Asset/Single Borrower
CMBS methodology. The rating approach for securities backed by a
single loan compares the credit risk inherent in the underlying
collateral with the credit protection offered by the structure. The
structure's credit enhancement is quantified by the maximum
deterioration in property value that the securities are able to
withstand under various stress scenarios without causing an
increase in the expected loss for various rating levels. In
assigning single borrower ratings, Moody's also consider a range of
qualitative issues as well as the transaction's structural and
legal aspects.

Willowbrook Mall is situated on an approximately 123.1-acre site
located 20 miles northwest of downtown Houston. The property's
non-collateral anchors, which comprise 809,709 SF, include Macy's,
Macy's Men's, JC Penney, and Dillard's, and the collateral anchors
include Dick's Sporting Goods (73,250 SF, 13.7% of collateral NRA)
and Nordstrom Rack (38,111 SF, 7.1% of collateral NRA).

As of March 31, 2021, the property was occupied with over 90
in-line tenants, with a physical occupancy of 86.5% and an economic
vacancy (excluding bankrupt tenants) of 83.8%. Physical occupancy
at the property is higher due to tenants that are bankrupt, but are
still occupying space and paying rent at the Property. The property
has a five-year average historical occupancy of 98.0%.

Large tenants at the property (greater than 10,000 SF) include H&M,
Zara, Old Navy, Victoria's Secret, and Wave. Other noteworthy
retailers at the property include Express, Abercrombie & Fitch,
House of Hoops, Sephora, Kay Jewelers, and Bath & Body Works. The
subject's most notable omnichannel retailers including Apple and
Lego. The subject's food venues include a 13-bay food court. Some
of the noteworthy food venues include Chick-fil-A, Cinnabon,
Subway, Taco Bell, and Starbucks.

The property was originally constructed in 1981; however, it has
been expanded and renovated numerous times since development. In
2016, Dick's Sporting Goods was added to the Property for a cost of
approximately $10 million. Between 2016 and 2020, approximately
$36.0 million of capital expenditures were spent on the Willowbrook
Mall property including developments to the Zara and Nordstrom Rack
spaces, updates to the energy systems, charging stations, lighting
and more. Future capital expenditures are estimated at
approximately $5.3 million which include roof replacement, security
upgrades, and parking lot pavements.

The credit risk of loans is determined primarily by two factors: 1)
Moody's assessment of the probability of default, which is largely
driven by each loan's DSCR, and 2) Moody's assessment of the
severity of loss upon a default, which is largely driven by each
loan's loan-to-value ratio, referred to as the Moody's LTV or MLTV.
As described in the CMBS methodology used to rate this transaction,
Moody's make various adjustments to the MLTV. Moody's adjust the
MLTV for each loan using a value that reflects capitalization (cap)
rates that are between Moody's sustainable cap rates and market cap
rates. Moody's also use an adjusted loan balance that reflects each
loan's amortization profile. The MLTV reported in this publication
reflects the MLTV before the adjustments described in the
methodology.

The Moody's first-mortgage DSCR is 1.93 and Moody's first-mortgage
stressed DSCR at a 9.25% constant is 1.16x. Moody's DSCR is based
on Moody's stabilized net cash flow.

The Moody's LTV ratio for the first-mortgage balance is 91.2%. The
Moody's LTV ratio is based on Moody's value.

Moody's also grades properties on a scale of 0 to 5 (best to worst)
and considers those grades when assessing the likelihood of debt
payment. The factors considered include property age, quality of
construction, location, market, and tenancy. The property's quality
grade is 3.00.

Notable strengths of the transaction include: strong in-line sales,
strong location, amortizing loan profile, and experienced
sponsorship.

Notable concerns of the transaction include: the effects of the
coronavirus pandemic, tenant rollover, lack of asset
diversification, recent decline in operating performance,
floating-rate mortgage loan profile and certain credit negative
legal features.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's
Approach to Rating Large Loan and Single Asset/Single Borrower
CMBS" published in September 2020.

Moody's approach for single borrower and large loan multi-borrower
transactions evaluates credit enhancement levels based on an
aggregation of adjusted loan level proceeds derived from Moody's
loan level LTV ratios. Major adjustments to determining proceeds
include leverage, loan structure, and property type. These
aggregated proceeds are then further adjusted for any pooling
benefits associated with loan level diversity, other concentrations
and correlations.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

The performance expectations for a given variable indicate Moody's
forward-looking view of the likely range of performance over the
medium term. Performance that falls outside the given range may
indicate that the collateral's credit quality is stronger or weaker
than Moody's had previously anticipated. Factors that may cause an
upgrade of the ratings include significant loan pay downs or
amortization, an increase in the pool's share of defeasance or
overall improved pool performance. Factors that may cause a
downgrade of the ratings include a decline in the overall
performance of the pool, loan concentration, increased expected
losses from specially serviced and troubled loans or interest
shortfalls.

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of commercial real estate from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in United States economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under
Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety.


CANYON CLO 2020-1: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on Class E-R Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to the class A-R, A-L1,
A-L2, A-L, B-R, C-R, D-R, and E-R replacement notes and loans from
Canyon CLO 2020-1 Ltd./Canyon CLO 2020-1 LLC, a CLO originally
issued in May 2020 that is managed by Canyon CLO Advisors LLC.

The replacement notes and loans were issued via a supplemental
indenture, which outlines the terms of the replacement notes.
According to the supplemental indenture:

-- The replacement class A-R, A-L1, A-L2, A-L, B-R, C-R, D-R, and
E-R notes and loans were issued at a lower spread over three-month
LIBOR than the original notes.

-- The stated maturity and the reinvestment period were extended
by six years from the original dates.

-- There is a two-year non-call period.

-- Of the identified underlying collateral obligations, 100.00%
have credit ratings assigned by S&P Global Ratings.

-- Of the identified underlying collateral obligations, 93.77%
have recovery ratings assigned by S&P Global Ratings.

-- S&P said, "Our review of this transaction included a cash flow
analysis, based on the portfolio and transaction data in the
trustee report, to estimate future performance. In line with our
criteria, our cash flow scenarios applied forward-looking
assumptions on the expected timing and pattern of defaults, and
recoveries upon default, under various interest rate and
macroeconomic scenarios."

-- S&P's analysis also considered the transaction's ability to pay
timely interest and/or ultimate principal to each of the rated
tranches.

S&P will continue to review whether, in its view, the ratings
assigned to the notes remain consistent with the credit enhancement
available to support them and take rating actions as it deems
necessary.

  Ratings Assigned

  Canyon CLO 2020-1 Ltd./Canyon CLO 2020-1 LLC

  Class A-R, $88.20 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-L1(i), $195.80 million: AAA (sf)
  A-L2, $100.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-L, $0.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B-R, $72.00 million: AA (sf)
  Class C-R (deferrable), $36.00 million: A (sf)
  Class D-R (deferrable), $36.00 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class E-R (deferrable), $24.00 million: BB- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $50.00 million: NR

  Ratings Withdrawn

  Canyon CLO 2020-1 Ltd./Canyon CLO 2020-1 LLC

  Class A to NR from 'AAA (sf)'
  Class B to NR from 'AA (sf)'
  Class C to NR from 'A (sf)'
  Class D to NR from 'BBB- (sf)'
  Class E to NR from 'BB- (sf)'

(i)The outstanding principal amount of the class A-L notes will be
$0.00 on the closing date, but it may increase up to $195,800,000
upon the exercise of the conversion option, which will affect the
conversion of the class A-L1 loans into the class A-L notes.
NR--Not rated.



CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL 2012-GC8: Fitch Lowers Class F Certs to 'Csf'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded five classes and affirmed four classes
of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-GC8 (CGCMT 2012-GC8)
commercial mortgage pass-through certificates.

    DEBT               RATING          PRIOR
    ----               ------          -----
CGCMT 2012-GC8

A-4 17318UAD6    LT  AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
A-AB 17318UAE4   LT  AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
A-S 17318UAF1    LT  AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf
B 17318UAG9      LT  Asf    Downgrade  AA-sf
C 17318UAH7      LT  BBBsf  Downgrade  A-sf
D 17318UAJ3      LT  B-sf   Downgrade  BBsf
E 17318UAS3      LT  CCsf   Downgrade  CCCsf
F 17318UAT1      LT  Csf    Downgrade  CCsf
X-A 17318UAK0    LT  AAAsf  Affirmed   AAAsf

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Decline to Credit Support; Upcoming Maturities: The downgrades are
primarily driven by credit deterioration to junior bonds since the
last rating action. Two loans have been disposed from the pool
since the last rating action, including one which was liquidated
with a higher than expected loss severity. The resulting $10.8
million in realized losses reduced the balance of the unrated class
G by 31.9% and eroded credit support to the non-senior bonds.

As of the May 2021 distribution, the pool's aggregate balance has
been reduced by 35.7% to $669 million from $1.0 billion at
issuance. All of the outstanding loans are scheduled to mature in
2022. Fitch expects that a number of loans will face refinance
challenges and may ultimately default at maturity, leaving the
junior bonds particularly exposed to under or non-performing loans.
Risk to the senior bonds is largely offset by the expected
principal paydown from defeased loans, which represent 23.3% of the
pool, and performing loans with healthy credit metrics.

Loss Expectations Unchanged: Fitch's loss projections are in line
with the last rating action. There are two loans (10.8% of the
pool) in special servicing, including one that transferred in the
last year. Eight loans (42.1% of the pool) are Fitch Loans of
Concern (FLOCs). Fitch's current ratings incorporate a base case
loss of 10.8%. The Negative Outlooks reflect losses that could
reach 12.8% when factoring in additional coronavirus-related
stresses and a potential outsized loss on the largest loan in
special servicing.

The largest contributors to expected losses continue to be two
FLOCs in the top 15. Pinnacle at Westchase (10.1% of the pool) is
secured by a mid-rise office property located in Houston's Energy
Corridor. The property experienced a significant decline in
occupancy prior to the onset of the pandemic. All three of the
previous largest tenants vacated in 2019 ahead of their lease
expiration dates. As a result, occupancy has declined to 25% from
98% at issuance. The social and market disruption caused by the
pandemic have exacerbated leasing challenges. Office properties in
Houston's Westchase submarket reported an average vacancy rate of
26.1% as of Q1 2021.

The loan transferred to special servicing for imminent default in
February 2020 due to the borrower's inability to fund shortfalls.
The special servicer has been pursuing foreclosure for nearly a
year, but the ongoing pandemic has caused delays. Fitch's modeled
loss of 66% is based off the asset's recent appraised value.
Fitch's analysis also includes a sensitivity, which assumes a 75%
loss to reflect the potential for a delayed foreclosure and
disposition timeline given the property's high vacancy and soft
submarket fundamentals.

Fitch's second largest modeled loss is attributable to Gansevoort
Park Avenue (10.0% of the pool). The loan is collateralized by a
249-key full-service boutique hotel located in Manhattan. EGI has
declined significantly over the past few years due to decreases in
Rooms, F&B and Other Revenues. Competing properties have impacted
property performance. At issuance, the property featured a
full-service restaurant, champagne bar and retail outlet. Those
leases expired between 2018 and 2020 and the spaces are now vacant.
At issuance, F&B income generated across the restaurants and clubs
accounted for more than 40% of total revenue. The hotel's website
notes that the property is temporarily closed again until July
2021.

The borrower requested payment relief related to the pandemic in
June 2020, and was granted a forbearance in August 2020 through
YE2020. The duration of the repayment period is unclear, but the
loan payment status is Current as of the May 2021 distribution.
Fitch's modeled loss of 28.6% is based on pre-pandemic performance,
which had already been in year-over-year decline, and reflects a
recoverable value of approximately $357,000 per key.

Alternative Loss Consideration: In addition to Fitch's base case
analysis, Fitch performed a sensitivity analysis which assumed a
75% loss on the maturity balance of the Pinnacle at Westchase loan
to reflect the potential for outsized losses. The sensitivity also
factored in various paydown scenarios, including paydown from
defeased loans and paydown from loans expected to refinance. This
contributed to the downgrades as well as the continuing Negative
Outlooks.

Exposure to Coronavirus: There are six hotel loans (17.2% of the
pool), five of which are flagged as FLOCs, and six retail loans
(12.9% of the pool). Fitch applied additional stresses to three
hotel and two retail loans totaling 12.2% of the pool to account
for potential cash flow disruptions due to the coronavirus
pandemic. These additional stresses contributed to the maintaining
of Negative Outlooks on classes B, C and D.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Stable to improved asset performance coupled with pay down
    and/or defeasance. An upgrade to classes B and C could occur
    with increased paydown and/or defeasance combined with
    performance stabilization but is unlikely given the pool's
    increasing concentration. Class D is not likely to be upgraded
    unless performance of the FLOCs stabilizes.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- An increase in pool level losses from underperforming loans.
    Downgrades to the classes rated 'AAAsf' are not considered
    likely due to the position in the capital structure and
    expected repayment from maturing loans, but are possible
    should interest shortfalls occur.

-- Downgrades to classes B and C are possible should a larger
    than expected number of maturity defaults occur. Class D may
    be downgraded if loss expectations increase or FLOCs fail to
    stabilize. Distressed ratings will be downgraded as losses are
    realized.

In addition to its baseline scenario, Fitch also envisions a
downside scenario where the health crisis is prolonged beyond 2021;
should this scenario play out, Fitch expects that a greater
percentage of classes may be assigned a Negative Outlook or those
with Negative Outlooks will be downgraded one or more categories.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance
transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as
the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings
are based on historical performance.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


CITIGROUP COMMERCIAL 2016-C2: DBRS Cuts Rating of 11 Classes to CCC
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited downgraded its ratings on the following classes of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2016-C2
issued by Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016-C2 (CGCMT
2016-C2) as follows:

-- Class E-1 to CCC (sf) from BB (high) (sf)
-- Class E-2 to CCC (sf) from BB (sf)
-- Class F-1 to CCC (sf) from BB (low) (sf)
-- Class F-2 to CCC (sf) from B (high) (sf)
-- Class G-1 to CCC (sf) from B (sf)
-- Class G-2 to CCC (sf) from B (low) (sf)
-- Class E to CCC (sf) from BB (sf)
-- Class EF to CCC (sf) from B (high) (sf)
-- Class F to CCC (sf) from B (high) (sf)
-- Class EFG to CCC (sf) from B (low) (sf)
-- Class G to CCC (sf) from B (low) (sf)

All of the classes that were downgraded have ratings that do not
carry trends. DBRS Morningstar maintained the Interest in Arrears
designation for all of the downgraded classes.

In addition, DBRS Morningstar confirmed the following ratings:

-- Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-3 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-4 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-AB at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (sf)
-- Class C at A (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-B at A (high) (sf)
-- Class X-D at BBB (sf)

All trends for the confirmed classes are Stable.

The rating downgrades reflect the extended period of time during
which the interest shortfalls will remain outstanding to the
classes in question. The shorted interest is a result of the
decision by the master servicer, Midland Loan Services (Midland),
to limit advancing for one of the underlying loans, Crocker Park
Phase I and II (Prospectus ID#3; 10.2% of the pool) (Crocker Park),
which was modified in 2020. The loan modification, which closed in
July 2020, allowed for a 12-month forbearance of debt service
payments, which would be deferred until loan maturity in August
2026. The loan modification was granted in response to the
borrower's request to use available cash flow to fund the $7.0
million of estimated leasing costs necessary to back-fill current
and projected future vacancy across the collateral property.
Initially, Midland declined to advance any of the forborne debt
service amount for the subject loan, but with the February 2021
remittance, the servicer switched to advancing only partial
payments, containing the interest shortfalls to the
below-investment-grade rated classes. Based on the estimates
provided by Midland, the interest shortfalls will remain
outstanding for at least 12 months, beyond DBRS Morningstar's
interest shortfall tolerance of six months for the
below-investment-grade classes, prompting the downgrades to the
ratings of 11 classes, as previously detailed.

DBRS Morningstar reached out the servicer regarding the provisions
in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (PSA) that Midland relied
upon when deciding to recover the advances that were made on the
Crocker Park loan. According to the servicer, it was determined
that the advances issued on the Crocker Park loan no longer
technically qualified as an advance under the PSA based on the
structure of the loan modification agreement structured by
Greystone, as the special servicer. Furthermore, Midland noted that
deferring recovery of the deferred amounts (and therefore the
advances) to the maturity date as allowed for under the terms of
the loan modification would risk the accumulation of substantial
interest on advances. It is unclear why Midland agreed to the terms
of the loan modification if there were reservations about the
accumulation of interest on advances. DBRS Morningstar will
continue to monitor the interest shortfall mechanics of the pool
and will track the recovery of advances and any updates on the
Crocker Park loan, as information is made available.

As of the April 2021 remittance, all 44 of the original loans
remain in the pool, with a total collateral reduction of 3.3% since
issuance as a result of loan amortization. There are 10 loans,
representing 23.0% of the current trust balance, on the servicer's
watchlist, and five loans, representing 14.2% of the current pool
balance, in special servicing. The loans on the watchlist are being
monitored for a variety of reasons, including low debt service
coverage ratios and occupancy issues. Four of the five loans in
special servicing are secured by either hotel or retail properties,
including Hyatt Regency Huntington Beach Resort & Spa (Prospectus
ID#7; 4.4% of the pool) and Welcome Hospitality Portfolio
(Prospectus ID#8; 4.0% of the pool). Additionally, three loans,
representing 6.2% of the pool, have defeased.

At issuance, DBRS Morningstar assigned an investment-grade shadow
rating on the Vertex Pharmaceuticals HQ loan (Prospectus ID#1;
10.2% of the pool). With this review, DBRS Morningstar confirmed
that the performance of this loan remains consistent with
investment-grade loan characteristics.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



CREDIT ACCEPTANCE 2021-3: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on ERR Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to the class A1RR, A2RR,
BRR, CRR, DRR, and ERR replacement notes and the new class XRR
notes from TCW CLO 2020-1 Ltd./TCW CLO 2020-1 LLC, a CLO originally
issued in April 2020 that is managed by TCW Group Inc. At the same
time, S&P withdrew its ratings on the original class AR, BR, CR,
DR, and ER notes following payment in full on the May 20, 2021,
refinancing date.

Based on provisions in the transaction documents and portfolio
characteristics:

-- The replacement class A1RR, A2RR, and BRR notes were issued at
a higher spread over three-month LIBOR than the original notes.

-- The class A1RR and A2RR notes replaced the original AR notes,
with the A1RR notes being senior to the A2RR notes.

-- The replacement class CRR, DRR, and ERR notes were issued at a
lower spread over three-month LIBOR than the original notes.

-- The stated maturity was extended 2.5 years.

-- A reinvestment period of 4.9 years was added to the previously
static transaction.

-- The non-call period was extended until April 2023.

-- A weighted average life test beginning at 8.9 years was added.

-- The class XRR notes were issued in connection with this
refinancing. These notes will be paid down using interest proceeds
during the first 14 payment dates beginning with the payment date
in October 2021.

-- Of the identified underlying collateral obligations, 100.00%
have credit ratings assigned by S&P Global Ratings.

-- Of the identified underlying collateral obligations, 95.76%
have recovery ratings assigned by S&P Global Ratings.

S&P said, "Our review of this transaction included a cash flow
analysis, based on the portfolio and transaction data in the
trustee report, to estimate future performance. In line with our
criteria, our cash flow scenarios applied forward-looking
assumptions on the expected timing and pattern of defaults, and
recoveries upon default, under various interest rate and
macroeconomic scenarios. Our analysis also considered the
transaction's ability to pay timely interest and/or ultimate
principal to each of the rated tranches.

"We will continue to review whether, in our view, the ratings
assigned to the notes remain consistent with the credit enhancement
available to support them and take rating actions as we deem
necessary."

  Ratings Assigned

  TCW CLO 2020-1 Ltd.

  Class XRR, $4.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A1RR, $300.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A2RR, $25.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class BRR, $55.00 million: AA (sf)
  Class CRR, $30.00 million: A (sf)
  Class DRR, $30.00 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class ERR, $20.00 million: BB- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $55.50 million: NR

  Ratings Withdrawn

  TCW CLO 2020-1 Ltd.

  Class AR to NR from 'AAA (sf)'
  Class BR to NR from 'AA (sf)'
  Class CR to NR from 'A (sf)'
  Class DR to NR from 'BBB- (sf)'
  Class ER to NR from 'BB- (sf)'

  NR--Not rated.



CSMC 2021-NQM3: S&P Assigns Prelim B (sf) Rating on Class B-2 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to CSMC
2021-NQM3's mortgage pass-through notes.

The note issuance is an RMBS transaction backed by seasoned and
unseasoned first-lien fixed-rate, adjustable-rate, and
adjustable-rate interest-only fully amortizing residential mortgage
loans to both prime and nonprime borrowers (some with interest-only
periods). The loans are secured by single-family residential
properties, planned-unit developments, condominiums, and two- to
four-family residential properties.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of May 20,
2021. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings assigned to CSMC 2021-NQM3's mortgage
pass-through notes reflect S&P's view of:

-- The pool's collateral composition;
-- The transaction's credit enhancement;
-- The transaction's associated structural mechanics;
-- The transaction's representation and warranty (R&W) framework;
-- The transaction's geographic concentration;
-- The mortgage aggregator, DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc. (DLJ); and
-- The impact the COVID-19 pandemic will likely have on the
performance of the mortgage borrowers in the pool and liquidity
available in the transaction.

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  CSMC 2021-NQM3 Trust

  Class A-1, $210,355,000: AAA (sf)
  Class A-2, $20,757,000: AA (sf)
  Class A-3, $33,476,000: A (sf)
  Class M-1, $13,010,000: BBB (sf)
  Class B-1, $7,602,000: BB (sf)
  Class B-2, $4,970,000: B (sf)
  Class B-3, $2,193,027: NR
  Class A-IO-S, Notional(i): NR
  Class XS, Notional(ii): NR
  Class PT(iii), $292,363,027: NR
  Class R: NR

(1)The notional amount will equal the aggregate interest-bearing
principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the first day of the
related due period and is initially $292,136,423.

(ii)The notional amount will equal the aggregate principal balance
of the mortgage loans as of the first day of the related due period
and is initially $292,363,027.

(iii)Certain initial exchangeable notes are exchangeable for the
exchangeable notes and vice versa.


DBGS 2019-1735: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on Class F Certs
-----------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. confirmed its ratings on all classes of the Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates issued by DBGS 2019-1735
Mortgage Trust as follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class X at A (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at B (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which remains in line with DBRS Morningstar's
expectations. The $311.4 million first-lien mortgage loan is
secured by the fee-simple interest in a 53-story Class A office
building totaling 1.3 million square feet (sf) in the Philadelphia
central business district (CBD). The 10-year loan matures in April
2029. The sponsor, Silverstein Properties, Inc., used loan proceeds
along with $164.2 million of cash equity to acquire the asset for
$451.6 million.

Built in 1990, 1735 Market Street is located on 18th Street between
Market Street and JFK Boulevard with direct concourse access to
SEPTA's Suburban Station and a 176-space parking garage. The
subject property is in the Market Street West submarket, which is
the largest office submarket in Philadelphia with approximately 39
million sf of office space. According to Reis, the submarket
reported a vacancy of 8.5% and average rental rate of $32.88 per sf
gross as of Q1 2021. The collateral achieves higher rental rates as
it is considered one of the top two multitenant office buildings in
the Philadelphia CBD, along with One Liberty Place.

The tenant mix primarily consists of law firms and financial
companies. The largest tenant at the property is Ballard Spahr LLP,
which leases 15.4% of the gross leasable area through January 2031.
The remaining tenant roster is relatively granular, as no other
tenant occupies more than 8% of net rentable area (NRA). The
second-largest tenant, Willis Towers Watson (7.6% of NRA), is
leased through February 2031, while the third-largest tenant,
Montgomery McCracken Walker (5.9% of NRA), is leased through 2034.
Three of the four largest tenants (Ballard Spahr LLP, Montgomery
McCracken Walker, and Brandywine Global Investment) have their
headquarters at the collateral property. The property also benefits
from minimal rollover concerns as the five largest tenants,
representing 38.8% of NRA, have lease expiration that expire beyond
the loan term.

The property has benefited from positive leasing momentum in recent
years as Willis Towers Watson relocated from 1500 Market Street and
signed a lease for 97,448 sf in 2020. Furthermore, international
law firm Akin Gump signed a 16-year lease totaling 30,000 sf in
2020, while national law firm BakerHostetler signed a 16-year lease
for 45,121 sf that is scheduled to commence in late 2021. This
leasing momentum led to an increase in net cash flow (NCF) in 2020
relative to the Issuer's NCF.

The sponsor is launching a $20 million capital improvement program
that will redesign the building's lobby, front entrance, amenity
spaces, and common areas as well as the concourse. Construction is
expected to commence in Q2 2021. The property was 84% occupied as
of YE2020 with a debt service coverage ratio of 2.42 times.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.


ENCINA EQUIPMENT 2021-1: DBRS Gives Prov. BB(sf) Rating on E Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
asset-backed notes to be issued by Encina Equipment Finance 2021-1,
LLC:

-- $108,700,000 Class A-1 Notes at AAA (sf)
-- $88,940,000 Class A-2 Notes at AAA (sf)
-- $13,242,000 Class B Notes at AA (sf)
-- $13,812,000 Class C Notes at A (sf)
-- $21,643,000 Class D Notes at BBB (sf)
-- $12,103,000 Class E Notes at BB (sf)

The ratings are based on the review by DBRS Morningstar of the
following analytical considerations:

(1) In its analytical review, DBRS Morningstar considered the set
of macroeconomic scenarios for select economies related to the
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), available in its commentary "Global
Macroeconomic Scenarios: March 2021 Update" published on March 17,
2021. DBRS Morningstar initially published macroeconomic scenarios
on April 16, 2020. The scenarios were updated on March 17, 2021 and
are reflected in DBRS Morningstar's rating analysis. The
assumptions consider the moderate macroeconomic scenario outlined
in the commentary (the moderate scenario serving as the primary
anchor for current ratings). The moderate scenario factors in
increasing success in containment during the first half of 2021,
enabling the continued relaxation of restrictions.

(2) DBRS Morningstar's respective stressed cumulative net loss
(CNL) hurdle rates of 32.94%, 27.99%, 22.74%, 15.87%, and 11.37% in
the cash flow scenarios commensurate with the AAA (sf), AA (sf), A
(sf), BBB (sf), and BB (sf) ratings did not assign any credit to
seasoning of the collateral of approximately 11 months as of the
Cut-Off Date. In addition, DBRS Morningstar assigned no credit to
any expected build-up in collateral coverage over the life of the
transaction.

(3) DBRS Morningstar assessed the stressed CNL hurdle rates at each
rating level by blending the stressed net loss assumptions for the
concentrated (including 22 obligors) and more granular portions of
the collateral pool based on their share of the Aggregate
Securitization Value.

(4) The transaction's capital structure and form and sufficiency of
available credit enhancement. The subordination,
overcollateralization, cash held in the reserve account, available
excess spread, and other structural provisions create credit
enhancement levels that are commensurate with the respective
ratings for each class of Notes.

(5) The weighted-average (WA) yield for the collateral pool is
approximately 8.43%. The securitization value of the collateral
pool is determined by discounting all leases and loans at either
implied or actual applicable contract rate, thus, creating excess
spread that may be available to the Notes.

(6) The transaction does not have a prefunding period.

(7) The transaction is the first 144A term securitization to be
sponsored by Encina Equipment Finance, LLC (Encina EF), which has
been operating since 2017. Nevertheless, the company's senior
management team has extensive experience in equipment industry,
originating, underwriting, and managing credit to small- and
middle-market companies in the United States through multiple
market cycles. Funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management hold a
minority equity interest in Encina EF and also participate in the
investment committee.

(8) Since inception, Encina EF has experienced a limited number of
obligor defaults and low and intermittent amount of charge-offs.

(9) The legal structure and presence of legal opinions that will
address the true sale of the assets to the Issuer, the
non-consolidation of the special-purpose vehicle with Encina EF,
that the trustee has a valid first-priority security interest in
the assets, and the consistency with the DBRS Morningstar Legal
Criteria for U.S. Structured Finance.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



EXETER AUTOMOBILE 2021-2: S&P Assigns (P) BB(sf) Rating on E Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to Exeter
Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2's automobile receivables-backed
notes.

The note issuance is an ABS transaction backed by subprime auto
loan receivables.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of May 20,
2021. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings reflect S&P's view of:

-- The availability of approximately 59.9%, 53.3%, 44.4%, 34.8%,
and 29.7% (for the base and upsized pools) credit support for the
class A-1, A-2, and A-3 notes (collectively, class A), B, C, D, and
E notes, respectively, based on stressed cash flow scenarios
(including excess spread). This credit support provides coverage of
approximately 2.78x, 2.44x, 1.99x, 1.52x, and 1.27x S&P's
21.00%-22.00% expected cumulative net loss range. These break-even
scenarios withstand cumulative gross losses of approximately 92.2%,
82.0%, 71.1%, 55.7%, and 47.6%, (for the base and upsized pools),
respectively.

-- S&P's expectation for timely interest and principal payments on
the notes, based on stressed cash flow modeling scenarios, which,
in its view, are appropriate for the assigned preliminary ratings.

-- S&P said, "Our expectation that under a moderate ('BBB') stress
scenario (1.52x our expected loss level), all else being equal, our
preliminary ratings will be within the credit stability limits
specified by section A.4 of the Appendix in "S&P Global Ratings
Definitions," published Jan. 5, 2021."

-- The collateral characteristics of the subprime automobile loans
securitized in this transaction.

-- The transaction's payment, credit enhancement, and legal
structures.

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  Exeter Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2

  Class A-1, $79.20 million ($105.79 million, if upsized): A-1+
(sf)
  Class A-2, $250.00 million ($330.00 million, if upsized): AAA
(sf)
  Class A-3, $100.86 million ($137.62 million, if upsized): AAA
(sf)
  Class B, $129.89 million ($173.20 million, if upsized): AA (sf)
  Class C, $140.11 million ($186.81 million, if upsized): A (sf)
  Class D, $147.53 million ($196.71 million, if upsized): BBB (sf)
  Class E, $52.42 million ($69.90 million, if upsized): BB (sf)



FLAGSHIP CREDIT 2021-2: S&P Assigns BB- (sf) Rating on E Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to Flagship Credit Auto
Trust 2021-2's automobile receivables-backed notes.

The note issuance is an ABS securitization backed by subprime auto
loan receivables.

The ratings reflect S&P's view of:

-- The availability of approximately 43.70%, 37.78%, 29.79%,
24.28%, and 20.42% credit support (including excess spread) for the
class A, B, C, D, and E notes, respectively, based on stressed cash
flow scenarios. These credit support levels provide coverage of
approximately 3.60x, 3.07x, 2.35x, 1.85x, and 1.52x of S&P's
11.50%-12.00% expected cumulative net loss range for the class A,
B, C, D, and E notes, respectively. These break-even scenarios
cover total cumulative gross defaults (using a recovery assumption
of 40.00%) of approximately 72.83%, 62.96%, 49.66%, 40.46%, and
34.03%, respectively.

-- The hard credit enhancement in the form of subordination,
overcollateralization, and a reserve account in addition to excess
spread.

-- The expectation that under a moderate ('BBB') stress scenario
(1.75x S&P's expected loss level), all else being equal, its 'AAA
(sf)', 'AA (sf)', 'A (sf)', 'BBB (sf)', and 'BB- (sf)' ratings on
the class A, B, C, D, and E notes, respectively, will be within the
credit stability limits specified by section A.4 of the Appendix
contained in "S&P Global Ratings Definitions," published Jan. 5,
2021.

-- The timely interest and principal payments made under stressed
cash flow modeling scenarios that are appropriate for the assigned
ratings.

-- The characteristics of the collateral pool being securitized.

-- The transaction's payment and legal structures.

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

  Ratings Assigned

  Flagship Credit Auto Trust 2021-2
  
  Class A, $248.33 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, $32.89 million: AA (sf)
  Class C, $41.76 million: A (sf)
  Class D, $24.95 million: BBB (sf)
  Class E, $14.78 million: BB- (sf)



GALAXY XXII: S&P Assigns B- (sf) Rating on Class F-RR Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to the replacement class
A-RR, B-RR, C-RR, D-RR, E-RR, and F-RR notes, along with the new
class X-RR notes, from Galaxy XXII CLO Ltd./Galaxy XXII CLO LLC, a
CLO originally issued July 14, 2016, managed by PineBridge
Investments LLC. The notes were previously refinanced in July 2018.
On the May 21, 2021, second refinancing date, proceeds from the
replacement notes were used to redeem the previously existing
notes. As such, ratings on the previously existing notes were
withdrawn. In addition, before the refinancing date, the
combination notes were unwound to their respective underlying
components in advance of the secured note redemption. Therefore, we
are withdrawing ratings on the combination notes as they no longer
exist.

The replacement notes will be issued via a second supplemental
indenture, which outlines the terms of the replacement notes.
According to the supplemental indenture:

-- The stated maturity (of the replacement notes and the existing
subordinated notes) and reinvestment period was extended 5.75 years
to April 2034 and April 2026, respectively.

-- The non-call period was extended 3.75 years to April 2023.

-- The weighted average life test was extended to nine years from
the second refinancing date.

-- The required minimum overcollateralization and interest
coverage ratios were amended.

-- The class F-RR notes were added to the capital stack and issued
at a lower rating level than the redeemed class E-R notes. In line
with this addition, the reinvestment test was amended to be tested
at the lower class F-RR note level.

-- The class X-RR notes were issued in connection with the May 21,
2021, second refinancing date. These notes are expected to be paid
down using interest proceeds during the first 19 payment dates, in
equal installments of $210,526.32, beginning with the payment date
in October 2021.

-- A portion of the proceeds remaining from the replacement note
issuance (after the simultaneous existing class redemption) will be
used to purchase additional collateral. However, there will not be
an additional effective date or ramp-up period, and the first
payment date following the May 21, 2021, second refinancing date
will be July 16, 2021.

-- There were no additional subordinated notes issued on the
second refinancing date.

-- The transaction has added the ability to purchase
workout-related assets and a small concentration in senior secured
bonds. In addition, the transaction has adopted benchmark
replacement language and made updates to conform to current rating
agency methodology.

  Replacement And Existing Note Issuances

  Replacement notes

  Class X-RR, $4.00 million: Three-month LIBOR + 0.90%
  Class A-RR, $243.80 million: Three-month LIBOR + 1.20%
  Class B-RR, $45.70 million: Three-month LIBOR + 1.70%
  Class C-RR (deferrable), $22.90 million: Three-month LIBOR +
2.15%
  Class D-RR (deferrable), $22.90 million: Three-month LIBOR +
3.35%
  Class E-RR (deferrable), $13.80 million: Three-month LIBOR +
6.50%
  Class F-RR (deferrable), $6.30 million: Three-month LIBOR +  
8.80%
  Class A subordinated notes, $27.56 million: Not applicable
  Class B subordinated notes, $0.44 million: Not applicable

  Existing notes
  
  Class A-1-R, $240.10 million(i): Three-month LIBOR + 1.00%
  Class A-2-R, $23.50 million(i): Three-month LIBOR + 0.85%
  Class B-1-R, $40.80 million: Three-month LIBOR + 1.68%
  Class B-2-R, $3.00 million: Three-month LIBOR + 2.10%
  Class C-1-R (deferrable), $11.00 million: Three-month LIBOR +
2.05%
  Class C-2-R (deferrable), $13.00 million: Three-month LIBOR +
2.90%
  Class D-R (deferrable), $20.00 million: Three-month LIBOR +  
3.10%
  Class E-R (deferrable), $20.00 million: Three-month LIBOR +
5.75%
  Class combination notes, $20.00 million: Not applicable
  Class A subordinated notes, $27.56 million: Not applicable
  Class B subordinated notes, $0.44 million: Not applicable

(i)Following the April 2021 distribution date, the class A-1-R and
A-2-R notes had approximately $200.37 million and $19.61 million
outstanding, respectively.

S&P said, "Our review of this transaction included a cash flow
analysis, based on the portfolio and transaction data in the
trustee report, to estimate future performance. In line with our
criteria, our cash flow scenarios applied forward-looking
assumptions on the expected timing and pattern of defaults, and
recoveries upon default, under various interest rate and
macroeconomic scenarios. Our analysis also considered the
transaction's ability to pay timely interest and/or ultimate
principal to each of the rated tranches.

"We will continue to review whether, in our view, the ratings on
the notes remain consistent with the credit enhancement available
to support them, and will take rating actions as we deem
necessary."


  Ratings Assigned

  Galaxy XXII CLO Ltd./Galaxy XXII CLO LLC

  Class X-RR, $4.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-RR, $243.80 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B-RR, $45.70 million: AA (sf)
  Class C-RR (deferrable), $22.90 million: A (sf)
  Class D-RR (deferrable), $22.90 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class E-RR (deferrable), $13.80 million: BB- (sf)
  Class F-RR (deferrable), $6.30 million: B- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $28.00 million: Not rated

  Ratings Withdrawn

  Galaxy XXII CLO Ltd./Galaxy XXII CLO LLC

  Class A-1-R, to not rated, from AAA (sf)
  Class A-2-R, to not rated, from AAA (sf)
  Class B-1-R, to not rated, from AA (sf)
  Class B-2-R, to not rated, from AA (sf)
  Class C-1-R (deferrable), to not rated, from A (sf)
  Class C-2-R (deferrable), to not rated, from A (sf)
  Class D-R (deferrable), to not rated, from BBB (sf)
  Class E-R (deferrable), to not rated, from B+ (sf)
  Combination notes, to not rated, from A-p (sf)



GPMT 2021-FL3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class G Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. confirmed the provisional ratings on the following
classes of notes to be issued by GPMT 2021-FL3, Ltd.:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The Issuer elected to make certain updates to the structure of the
transaction after DBRS Morningstar assigned provisional ratings on
April 26, 2021. The Issuer made the following updates: changed the
deal type to static from managed, removed the $101.3 million ramp
component, and removed the DBRS Morningstar $5.0 million threshold
rating agency confirmation (RAC) requirement for the acquisition of
companion participations with principal repayment proceeds. DBRS
Morningstar analyzed the updated structure in the model, which
resulted in increased pool losses for the AAA (sf) and AA (low)
(sf) rating levels and lower pool losses for the A (low) (sf), BBB
(sf), and B (low) (sf) rating levels. These changes reflect the
updated pool having a lower expected loss than the initial modeled
pool but also a lower level of diversity. The Issuer has updated
the class balances across the capital stack to reflect both the
change in pool size and the change in credit enhancement levels.
The provisional ratings DBRS Morningstar assigned to all classes
remains unchanged. The Issuer has reannounced the transaction with
the updated class balances and corresponding credit enhancement
levels.

Coronavirus Overview

With regard to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic, the
magnitude and extent of performance stress posed to global
structured finance transactions remains highly uncertain. This
considers the fiscal and monetary policy measures and statutory law
changes that have already been implemented or will be implemented
to soften the impact of the crisis on global economies. Some
regions, jurisdictions, and asset classes are, however, feeling
more immediate effects. Accordingly, DBRS Morningstar may apply
additional short-term stresses to its rating analysis. For example,
DBRS Morningstar may front-load default expectations and/or assess
the liquidity position of a structured finance transaction with
more stressful operational risk and/or cash flow timing
considerations.

The initial collateral consists of 27 floating-rate mortgages
secured by 32 mostly transitional properties, with a cut-off
balance totaling $823.7 million, excluding approximately $143.3
million of future funding commitments. The collateral comprises one
combined loan, 23 participations in mortgage loans, two
participations in combined loans, and one senior participation in a
mortgage loan. Combined loans include a mortgage loan and related
mezzanine loan and are treated as a single loan. Most loans are in
a period of transition with plans to stabilize and improve the
asset value. During the Companion Participation Acquisition Period,
the Issuer may acquire future funding commitments subject to the
Acquisition Criteria. The transaction does not include RAC for the
acquisition of companion participations if there is already a
participation of the underlying loan in the trust.

For the floating-rate loans, DBRS Morningstar used the one-month
Libor index, which is based on the lower of a DBRS Morningstar
stressed rate that corresponded to the remaining fully extended
term of the loans or the strike price of the interest rate cap with
the respective contractual loan spread added to determine a
stressed interest rate over the loan term. When the cut-off
balances were measured against the DBRS Morningstar As-Is net cash
flow (NCF), 20 loans, comprising 73.1% of the initial pool, had a
DBRS Morningstar As-Is debt service credit ratio (DSCR) below 1.00
times (x), a threshold indicative of default risk. However, the
DBRS Morningstar Stabilized DSCRs for only four loans, comprising
17.1% of the initial pool balance, are below 1.00x. The properties
are often transitioning with potential upside in cash flow;
however, DBRS Morningstar does not give full credit to the
stabilization if there are no holdbacks or if other loan structural
features in place are insufficient to support such treatment.
Furthermore, even with the structure provided, DBRS Morningstar
generally does not assume the assets to stabilize above market
levels. The transaction will have a sequential-pay structure.

The transaction benefits from strong DBRS Morningstar Market Ranks
with 66.5% of the properties in the pool are located in a DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank 6, 7, or 8, which is considerably higher
than recent commercial real estate collateralized loan obligation
(CRE CLO) transactions rated by DBRS Morningstar. The DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank range is 1 to 8, with 8 representing the
highest-density markets with the greatest amount of liquidity and
most origination activity. DBRS Morningstar recognizes market
liquidity by giving credit to loans secured by properties in dense
urban locations and penalizing loans in less populated areas and
areas with lower economic activity. Also, the historical commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) conduit loan data shows that
probability of default (POD) increases in middle markets (Market
Rank 3 or 4); moderates in tertiary and rural markets (Market Rank
1 or 2); and greatly improves in primary urban markets (Market Rank
6, 7, or 8). Historical loan data further supports the idea that
loss given default (LGD) increases in tertiary and rural markets,
and the lowest LGDs were noted in Market Rank 8. The initial pool
consists of 28.8% of the cut-off date loan balance in Market Rank
6, 19.9% in Market Rank 7, and 17.8% in Market Rank 8.

The weighted-average (WA) DBRS Morningstar Stabilized loan-to-value
ratio (LTV) and DSCR are 65.0% and 1.35x, respectively. These
credit metrics compare favorably with recent CRE CLO transactions
rated by DBRS Morningstar and, by comparison, result in lower loan
level PODs and LGDs. Approximately 16 collateral interests (56.4%
of the pool) have an As-Is DSCR below 1.00x (excluding loan debt
service reserve/deal structure).

The Sponsor for the transaction, Granite Point Mortgage Trust
(GPMT), is an experienced CRE CLO issuer and collateral manager. As
of December 31, 2020, GPMT had an equity capitalization of more
than $930 million and managed a commercial mortgage debt portfolio
of approximately $4.4 billion. GPMT has completed two CRE CLO
securitizations: GPMT 2018-FL1 and GPMT 2019-FL2. Additionally,
GPMT CLO Holdings LLC, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of GPMT
will purchase and retain 100.0% of the Class F Notes, the Class G
Notes, the Class H Notes, and the Preferred Shares, which total
16.75% of the transaction total.

The loans are generally secured by traditional property types
(i.e., office, multifamily, and mixed-use), with only 4.2% of the
pool secured by hotels. Additionally, only one of the multifamily
loans (The Rowan, representing 0.8% of initial pool balance) in the
pool is currently secured by student housing properties, which
often exhibit higher cash flow volatility than traditional
multifamily properties. The initial loan pool exhibits a Herfindahl
score of 20.9 (27 collateral interests), which is favorable for a
CRE CLO transaction and higher than most recent CRE CLO
transactions rated by DBRS Morningstar.

All of the loans in the pool were originated before April 2020 and
16 collateral interest (56.4% of the pool) have an As-Is DSCR below
1.00x (without considering loan debt service reserves/deal
structure). Low cash flows have directly affected many of the loans
in the pool, with 12 loans receiving some form of loan modification
since origination, and, as of the date of this report, four loans
were in the process of being modified. The loan modifications vary,
depending on the needs of the borrower but may include an increase
in the loan amount, extension of the maturity date, reset of the
forced funding date, and/or reduction in the Libor floor. DBRS
Morningstar received coronavirus and business plan updates for all
loans in the pool and incorporated these findings into the DBRS
Morningstar NCF analysis and Business Plan Scores. Furthermore, all
debt service payments have been received in full through March
2021. All of the properties were re-appraised in 2021 and the
latest appraisals took into account recent property performance,
market trends since the onset of the pandemic, and general property
condition observations. The issuer provided DBRS Morningstar recent
property financial statements and rent rolls, which are preferred
for a more accurate view into underlying property cash flow
performance. This information will continue to be shared with DBRS
Morningstar throughout the transaction and be subject to periodic
reviews.

DBRS Morningstar has analyzed the loans to a stabilized cash flow
that is, in some instances, above the in-place cash flow. It is
possible that the sponsors will not successfully execute their
business plans and that the higher stabilized cash flow will not
materialize during the loan term, particularly with the ongoing
coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the overall economy. A
sponsor's failure to execute the business plan could result in a
term default or the inability to refinance the fully funded loan
balance. DBRS Morningstar sampled a large portion of the loans,
representing 73.4% of the pool cut-off date balance. Physical site
inspections were also performed, including management meetings.
Most site inspections were completed in early 2020, prior to the
onset of the pandemic and closer to loan origination. DBRS
Morningstar made relatively conservative stabilization assumptions
and, in each instance, considered the business plan to be rational
and the loan structure to be sufficient to execute such plans. In
addition, DBRS Morningstar analyzes LGD based on the as-is credit
metrics, assuming the loan is fully funded with no NCF or value
upside. Future Funding companion participations will be held by
affiliates of GPMT and have the obligation to make future advances.
GPMT agrees to indemnify the Issuer against losses arising out of
the failure to make future advances when required under the related
participated loan. Furthermore, GPMT will be required to meet
certain liquidity requirements on a quarterly basis.

Four of the sampled loans, comprising 22.9% of the pool balance,
were analyzed with Weak sponsorship strengths. Three of the
loans—Times Square West, Mid Main, and SunTrust Center—are
among the pool's 10 largest loans. DBRS Morningstar applied a POD
penalty to loans analyzed with Weak sponsorship strength.

All 27 loans have floating interest rates, and all loans are
interest only during the original term and have original terms of
24 months to 37 months, creating interest rate risk. All loans are
short-term loans, and, even with extension options, they have a
fully extended maximum loan term of five to six years. For the
floating-rate loans, DBRS Morningstar used the one-month Libor
index, which is based on the lower of a DBRS Morningstar stressed
rate that corresponded to the remaining fully extended term of the
loans or the strike price of the interest rate cap with the
respective contractual loan spread added to determine a stressed
interest rate over the loan term.

The property condition assessments for all mortgaged properties are
dated more than 12 months prior to the cut-off date. GPMT's
third-party asset manager coordinates site visits to each of the
properties in the pool annually and has conducted site visits on
all of the assets in the pool within the past 12 months (with the
exception of Indico Nashville and Cornerstone Corporate, which were
originated in 2020). In most cases, the business plan includes
capital improvements to the property, which are expected to improve
the overall property condition. Active construction sites are
monitored by consultants that visit properties and evaluate the
progress of renovation work.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



GS MORTGAGE 2021-ROSS: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on G Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation Trust 2021-ROSS, Series
2021-ROSS, as follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-Y at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-Z at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-IO at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class D at A (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable. Class X and Class H are not rated by DBRS
Morningstar.

Class X is an interest-only (IO) class whose balance is notional.

The Class A, A-Y, A-Z, and A-IO certificates (the CAST
certificates) can be exchanged for other classes of CAST
certificates and vice versa, as described in the offering
memorandum. The notional amount of the Class A-IO certificates will
be equal to the sum of (1) 50% of the certificate balance of the
Class A-Y certificates and (2) 100% of the certificate balance of
the Class A-Z certificates.

The GS Mortgage Securities Corporation Trust 2021-ROSS portfolio,
consisting of the fee-simple interests in seven properties totaling
approximately 2.13 million sf of Class A/B, cross-collateralized
office space, is well-positioned to take advantage of improving
market fundamentals as the Rosslyn market continues transform into
a modern, mixed-use, live-work-play environment. Having been
heavily affected by the Department of Defense Base Realignment and
Closure Act (BRAC) and the federal budget sequestration as well as
historically dominated by government tenants and contractors, the
submarket continues to diversify with private sector tenants
committing to the market at the portfolio and at other properties
in Rosslyn. Overall vacancy rates in the submarket spiked to a peak
of 28.2% in 2014 and according to the appraisals, the vacancy rate
at the end of 2020 (including sublet availabilities) was 18.1%, up
from year-end 2019 due to pandemic-related dynamics, but down from
the 2018 level of 21.7%.

Following Amazon's November 2018 announcement that it will
construct its new "HQ2" Pen Place campus in nearby Arlington,
demand by private office tenants has further increased in the
Rosslyn market as users find themselves priced out of the Arlington
office market where rents have already started to increase. Demand
by office tenants and residential tenants alike is expected to
continue to rise in Rosslyn as workers move to the area for
Amazon's assumed 25,000 new high-paying jobs and Amazon suppliers
seek a presence close to their customer. Construction review of the
second phase of the HQ2 project commenced early March 2021 and is
expected to deliver by 2025. As of December 2020, Amazon had
already relocated 1,600 employees to the Arlington area. In
addition, approximately 1.5 million sf of noncompetitive, low
price-point office product in Rosslyn (approximately 44% of lesser
quality supply) is approved or proposed for mixed-use development
to create an additional 2,200 residential units, 350 hotel rooms,
and 135,000 sf of retail. Previously identified as an office
dominant submarket with considerable exposure to government
tenants, further development borne out of obsolete office product
will continue to reduce the stock of noncompetitive, low
price-point office supply in Rosslyn.

Five of the properties were previously securitized in 2017 in the
RPT 2017-ROSS transaction, which was financed by GSCRE and BXMT.
1400 Key Boulevard and 1401 Wilson Boulevard, which were part of
the 2017 securitization, have been replaced by 1200 Wilson
Boulevard and 1701 North Fort Myer Drive. Strong and experienced
sponsorship has invested approximately $168.7 million toward
renovating and re-leasing the Rosslyn portfolio's seven buildings
since 2017, which has included the creation of spacious upgraded
lobbies, renovated common areas, and the addition of modern tenant
amenities such as club-quality fitness centers and airy open common
areas demanded by today's workforce. 1100 Wilson Boulevard has seen
the addition of a finished roof deck, which allows tenants to enjoy
the views of neighboring Washington, D. C., just across the Potomac
River. Behind the scenes, the building systems have been upgraded
and modernized as needed to meet today's high-tech needs. The
Sponsor's continued investment in the properties has resulted in
new and renewal leases totaling approximately 982,000 sf (46.2% of
the total NRA) since the beginning of 2017.

As of February 28, 2021, the portfolio was 78.2% leased across the
seven properties to a diverse mix of over 60 individual public and
private sector tenants. The portfolio's largest tenant is the U.S.
Department of State (342,967 sf, 16.1% of the NRA), which recently
executed a 15-year renewal at 1701 North Fort Myer Drive, expanded
into 1200 Wilson Boulevard in 2019, and does not roll until June
2034. Other than the Department of State, no single tenant occupies
more than 6.0% of the portfolio's NRA or produces more than 8.0% of
the gross rents. Approximately 671,000 sf (31.6% of the NRA) of the
portfolio's rent roll and 36.1% of total rent carries an investment
grade rating. Since 2009, the portfolio has averaged an occupancy
level of 81.5%, with a peak occupancy of 98.5% in 2009 and a trough
occupancy of 67.0% in 2015.

The portfolio is owned by a joint venture between US Real Estate
Opportunities I, L.P. (approximately 89% ownership) (USREO) and an
affiliate of Monday Properties (approximately 11% ownership). USREO
is a $1.3 billion fund formed by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.,
which controls the fund, and two sovereign wealth funds. Monday
Properties has managed the properties since 2005 and, together with
its partner, has owned the properties since 2011. As of December
2020, the Sponsor had a total cost basis in the portfolio of
approximately $1.35 billion and will have $329 million of implied
equity remaining in the portfolio post transaction. The Sponsor
also contributed approximately $106 million of equity in June 2020
to pay down the existing debt in order to qualify for an extension.
DBRS Morningstar believes that the substantial amount of Sponsor
equity, combined with sponsorship's combined strength and
experience as reflected by proactive repositioning of the
properties, adds to the strength of this transaction.

The ongoing Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic continues to
pose challenges and risks to virtually all major commercial real
estate (CRE) property types and has created an element of
uncertainty around future demand for office space, even in gateway
markets that have historically been highly liquid. Despite the
disruptions and uncertainty, the collateral has largely been
unaffected with year-to-date rent collections as of April 2021 at
99.2%.

GS Commercial Real Estate LLC and Goldman Sachs Bank USA intend to
originate the $841 million whole loan, which consists of a $691
million mortgage loan and $150 million of mezzanine debt. The
mortgage loan has a two-year initial term (with three one-year
extension options). The mortgage loan pays floating-rate interest
of Libor plus assumed spread of 2.92000% on an interest-only (IO)
basis through the initial maturity of the loan. The spread will
increase by 0.15% from and after the commencement of the second
extension term; Libor is subject to a floor of 0%. The mezzanine
loan has a two-year initial term (with three one-year extension
options). The mezzanine loan pays floating-rate interest of Libor
plus 9.50000% on an IO basis through the final initial of the loan.
On or about May 28, 2021, a portion of the mezzanine loan evidenced
by the $112.5 million Note A-1 is expected to be securitized in a
stand-alone, mezzanine securitization, the certificates of which
are expected to be purchased by Lord Abbett, and the remaining
portion of the Mezzanine Loan evidenced by the $37.5 million Note
A-2 is expected to be purchased by a sovereign wealth fund that has
an ownership interest in USREO.

The Sponsor is partially using proceeds from the whole loan and
mezzanine debt to repatriate approximately $63.3 million of equity.
DBRS Morningstar views cash-out refinancing transactions as less
favorable than acquisition financings as sponsors typically have
less incentive to support a property through times of economic
stress if less of their own cash equity is at risk. Based on the
appraiser's as-is valuation of $1.17 billion, the Sponsor will have
approximately $329 million of unencumbered market equity remaining
in the transaction.

The DBRS Morningstar loan-to-value ratio (LTV) is high at 112.4%
based on the $691 million mortgage loan and increases substantially
to an all-in DBRS Morningstar LTV of 136.7% when factoring in the
mezzanine debt. In order to account for the high leverage, DBRS
Morningstar programmatically reduced its LTV benchmark targets for
the transaction by 2.75% across the capital structure.

The nonrecourse carveout guarantor is US Real Estate Opportunities
I, L.P., which is required to maintain a domestic net worth of only
at least $225 million or more, inclusive of the property, and
aggregate liquid assets of at least $25 million, effectively
limiting the recourse back to the Sponsor for bad act carveouts.
"Bad boy" guarantees and consequent access to the guarantor help
mitigate the risk and increased loss severity of bankruptcy,
additional encumbrances, unapproved transfers, fraud,
misappropriation of rents, physical waste, and other potential bad
acts of the borrower or its sponsor.

Individual properties are permitted to be released with customary
requirements. However, the prepayment premium for the release of
individual assets is 105% of the ALA for the applicable property up
to 25% of the original principal balance and thereafter 115% of the
ALA for the applicable property. DBRS Morningstar considers the
release premium to be weaker than those of other previously rated
single-borrower, multiproperty transactions and, as a result,
applied a penalty to the transaction's capital structure to account
for the weak deleveraging premium.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



HALCYON LOAN 2015-1: Moody's Lowers Rating on Class E Notes to Caa3
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the rating on the
following notes issued by Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2015-1
Ltd.:

US$25,000,000 Class E Junior Secured Deferrable Floating Rate Notes
due 2027 (current outstanding balance of $27,081,923.38) (the
"Class E Notes"), Downgraded to Caa3 (sf); previously on July 31,
2020 Downgraded to Caa1 (sf)

Moody's also upgraded the rating on the following notes:

US$35,000,000 Class C-R Mezzanine Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2027 (the "Class C-R Notes"), Upgraded to Aa1 (sf);
previously on February 24, 2020 Upgraded to Aa2 (sf)

Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2015-1 Ltd., originally issued in
April 2015 and partially refinanced in October 2017, is a managed
cashflow CLO. The notes are collateralized primarily by a portfolio
of broadly syndicated senior secured corporate loans. The
transaction's reinvestment period ended in April 2019.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade rating action on the Class E notes reflects the
specific risks to the junior notes posed by par loss and credit
deterioration observed in the underlying CLO portfolio. Based on
the trustee's April 2021 report, the OC ratio for the Class E notes
is reported [1] at 95.85% versus trustee's July 2020 report [2] at
97.85%.

The upgrade rating action on the Class C-R Notes is primarily a
result of deleveraging of the senior notes and an increase in the
transaction's over-collateralization (OC) ratios since July 2020.
The Class A-R notes have been paid down by approximately 73% or
$105.4 million since then. Based on the trustee's April 2021 report
[3], the OC ratio for the Class C-R is reported at 126.41% versus
119.77% in the trustee's July 2020 report [4].

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations."

The key model inputs Moody's used in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score and weighted
average recovery rate, are based on its published methodology and
could differ from the trustee's reported numbers. For modeling
purposes, Moody's used the following base-case assumptions:

Performing par and principal proceeds balance: $186,288,330

Defaulted par: $8,607,194

Diversity Score: 46

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 3169

Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for LIBOR floors):
3.60%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 46.8%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 3.2 years

Par haircut in OC tests and interest diversion test: 4.9%

In consideration of the current high uncertainties around the
global economy, and the ultimate performance of the CLO portfolio,
Moody's conducted a number of additional sensitivity analyses
representing a range of outcomes that could diverge, both to the
downside and the upside, from Moody's base case. Some of the
additional scenarios that Moody's considered in its analysis of the
transaction include, among others: additional near-term defaults of
companies facing liquidity pressure; sensitivity analysis on
deteriorating credit quality due to a large exposure to loans with
negative outlook, and a lower recovery rate assumption on defaulted
assets to reflect declining loan recovery rate expectations.

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of corporate assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in the US economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under
Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety.

Methodology Used for the Rating Action

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.

Factors that Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the rated notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the rated notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change.


ICG US 2016-1: S&P Assigns Prelim BB-(sf) Rating on DR-R Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to ICG US CLO
2016-1 Ltd./ICG US CLO 2016-1 LLC's floating-rate notes.

The note issuance is a CLO securitization governed by investment
criteria and backed primarily by broadly syndicated
speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' and lower) senior secured term loans
that are governed by collateral quality tests. The transaction is
managed by ICG Debt Advisors LLC.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of May 24,
2021. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings reflect:

-- The diversification of the collateral pool, which consists
primarily of broadly syndicated speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' and
lower) senior secured term loans that are governed by collateral
quality tests.

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization.

-- The experience of the collateral manager's team, which can
affect the performance of the rated notes through collateral
selection, ongoing portfolio management, and trading.

-- The transaction's legal structure, which is expected to be
bankruptcy remote.

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  ICG US CLO 2016-1 Ltd. /ICG US CLO 2016-1 LLC

  Class X, $4.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A1R-R, $246.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A2R-R, $58.00 million: AA (sf)
  Class BR-R (deferrable), $24.00 million: A (sf)
  Class CR-R (deferrable), $24.00 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class DR-R (deferrable), $16.00 million: BB- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $44.75 million: not rated



INVESCO CLO 2021-2: Moody's Gives (P)Ba3 Rating to Class E Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned provisional ratings to five
classes of notes to be issued by Invesco CLO 2021-2, Ltd. (the
"Issuer" or "Invesco 2021-2").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$320,000,000 Class A Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2034
(the "Class A Notes"), Assigned (P)Aaa (sf)

US$60,000,000 Class B Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2034
(the "Class B Notes"), Assigned (P)Aa2 (sf)

US$27,500,000 Class C Deferrable Mezzanine Secured Floating Rate
Notes due 2034 (the "Class C Notes"), Assigned (P)A2 (sf)

US$30,000,000 Class D Deferrable Mezzanine Secured Floating Rate
Notes due 2034 (the "Class D Notes"), Assigned (P)Baa3 (sf)

US$22,500,000 Class E Deferrable Junior Secured Floating Rate Notes
due 2034 (the "Class E Notes"), Assigned (P)Ba3 (sf)

The Class A Notes, the Class B Notes, the Class C Notes, the Class
D Notes, and the Class E Notes are referred to herein,
collectively, as the "Rated Notes."

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks, particularly those associated with
the CLO's portfolio and structure.

Invesco 2021-2 is a managed cash flow CLO. The issued notes will be
collateralized primarily by broadly syndicated senior secured
corporate loans. At least 90% of the portfolio must consist of
first lien senior secured loans and eligible investments, and up to
10% of the portfolio may consist of senior unsecured loans, second
lien loans, first-lien-last-out loans and up to 5% of permitted
debt obligations (senior secured bonds, senior secured floating
rate notes and high-yield bonds). Moody's expect the portfolio to
be approximately 90% ramped as of the closing date.

Invesco CLO Equity Fund 3 L.P. (the "Manager") will direct the
selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets on behalf of
the Issuer and may engage in trading activity, including
discretionary trading, during the transaction's five-year
reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain restrictions,
the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal payments and
proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the Rated Notes, the Issuer will issue subordinated
notes.

The transaction incorporates interest and par coverage tests which,
if triggered, divert interest and principal proceeds to pay down
the notes in order of seniority.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2020.

For modeling purposes, Moody's used the following base-case
assumptions:

Par amount: $500,000,000

Diversity Score: 75

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2889

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.40%

Weighted Average Coupon (WAC): 7.00%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.00%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 9.08 years

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of corporate assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in U.S. economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under
Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Rated Notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the Rated Notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the Rated Notes.


JP MORGAN 2021-7: Fitch Gives 'B+(EXP)' Rating to Class B-5 Debt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned expected rating to JP Morgan Mortgage
Trust 2021-7 (JPMMT 2021-7).

DEBT                RATING
----                ------
JPMMT 2021-7

A-1      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-2      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-3      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-3-A    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-3-X    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-4      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-4-A    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-4-X    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-5      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-5-A    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-5-B    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-5-X    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-6      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-6-A    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-6-X    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-7      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-7-A    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-7-B    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-7-X    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-8      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-8-A    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-8-X    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-9      LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-9-A    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-9-X    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-10     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-10-A   LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-10-X   LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-11     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-11-X   LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-11-A   LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-11-AI  LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-11-B   LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-11-BI  LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-12     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-13     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-14     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-15     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-16     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-17     LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-X-1    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-X-2    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-X-3    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
A-X-4    LT AAA(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
B-1      LT AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
B-1-A    LT AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
B-1-X    LT AA-(EXP)sf   Expected Rating
B-2      LT A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
B-2-A    LT A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
B-2-X    LT A-(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
B-3      LT BBB-(EXP)sf  Expected Rating
B-4      LT BB(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
B-5      LT B+(EXP)sf    Expected Rating
B-6      LT NR(EXP)sf    Expected Rating

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

The certificates are supported by 991 loans with a total balance of
approximately $957.10 million as of the cutoff date. The pool
consists of prime quality fixed-rate mortgages (FRMs) from various
mortgage originators. The servicers in the transactions consist of
JP Morgan Chase Bank and various other servicers. Nationstar
Mortgage LLC (Nationstar) will be the master servicer.

All of the loans qualify as either Safe Harbor Qualified Mortgages
(SHQM) or Agency Safe Harbor QM loans.

There is no exposure to LIBOR in this transaction. The collateral
comprises 100% fixed-rate loans, and the certificates are fixed
rate based off of the net weighted average coupon (WAC), or
floating/inverse floating rate based off of the SOFR index, and
capped at the net WAC. This is the sixth Fitch-rated JPMMT
transaction to use SOFR as the index rate for floating/inverse
floating-rate certificates.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High-Quality Mortgage Pool (Positive): The pool consists of very
high-quality fixed-rate fully amortizing loans with maturities up
to 30 years. All of the loans qualify as SHQM or Agency Safe Harbor
QM loans. The loans were made to borrowers with strong credit
profiles, relatively low leverage and large liquid reserves. The
loans are seasoned at an average of four months according to Fitch
(two months per the transaction documents). The pool has a weighted
average (WA) original FICO score of 780 (as determined by Fitch),
which is indicative of very high credit quality borrowers.
Approximately 88.8% (as determined by Fitch) of the loans have a
borrower with an original FICO score above 750. In addition, the
original WA combined loan-to-value ratio (CLTV) of 65.6%,
translating to a sustainable loan-to-value ratio (sLTV) of 71.0%,
represents substantial borrower equity in the property and reduced
default risk.

96.1% of the pool comprises nonconforming loans, while the
remaining 3.9% represents conforming loans. 100% of the loans are
designated as QM loans, with roughly 75.3% of the pool being
originated by a retail channel.

The pool consists of 90.6% of loans where the borrower maintains a
primary residence, while 6.4% comprises second homes and 3.0%
represents nonpermanent residences that were treated as investor
properties. Single-family homes comprise 93.8% of the pool, and
condominiums make up 4.9%. Cashout refinances comprise 11.3% of the
pool, purchases comprise 32.0% of the pool and rate-term refinances
comprise 56.7% of the pool.

A total of 347 loans in the pool are over $1.0 million, and the
largest loan is $2.92 million.

Fitch determined that 3.0% of the loans were made to foreign
nationals/nonpermanent residents. These loans were treated as
investor-occupied to reflect the additional risk they may pose.

Geographic Concentration (Negative): Approximately 49.9% of the
pool is concentrated in California. The largest MSA concentration
is in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA MSA (16.6), followed by
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA MSA (12.8%), and the San
Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA MSA (9.0%). The top three MSAs
account for 38.4% of the pool. As a result, there was a 1.01x
probability of default (PD) penalty for geographic concentration.

Shifting Interest Structure (Mixed): The mortgage cash flow and
loss allocation are based on a senior-subordinate,
shifting-interest structure whereby the subordinate classes receive
only scheduled principal and are locked out from receiving
unscheduled principal or prepayments for five years. The lockout
feature helps to maintain subordination for a longer period should
losses occur later in the life of the deal. The applicable credit
support percentage feature redirects subordinate principal to
classes of higher seniority if specified credit enhancement (CE)
levels are not maintained.

CE Floor (Positive): A CE or senior subordination floor of 0.55%
has been considered to mitigate potential tail end risk and loss
exposure for senior tranches as the pool size declines and
performance volatility increases due to adverse loan selection and
small loan count concentration. Additionally, a junior
subordination floor of 0.45% has been considered to mitigate
potential tail-end risk and loss exposure for subordinate tranches
as the pool size declines and performance volatility increases due
to adverse loan selection and small loan count concentration.

Updated Economic Risk Factor (Positive): Consistent with the
"Additional Scenario Analysis" section of Fitch's "U.S. RMBS
Coronavirus-Related Analytical Assumptions" criteria, Fitch will
consider applying additional scenario analysis based on stressed
assumptions as described in the section to remain consistent with
significant revisions to Fitch's macroeconomic baseline scenario or
if actual performance data indicates the current assumptions
require reconsideration. In response to revisions made to Fitch's
macroeconomic baseline scenario, observed actual performance data,
and the unexpected development in the health crisis arising from
the advancement and availability of coronavirus vaccines, Fitch
reconsidered the application of the Coronavirus-related ERF floors
of 2.0 and used ERF Floors of 1.5 and 1.0 for the 'BBsf' and 'Bsf'
rating stresses, respectively. Fitch's March 2021 Global Economic
Outlook and related base-line economic scenario forecasts have been
revised to a 6.2% U.S. GDP growth for 2021 and 3.3% for 2022
following a -3.5% GDP growth in 2020. Additionally, Fitch's U.S.
unemployment forecasts for 2021 and 2022 are 5.8% and 4.7%,
respectively, which is down from 8.1% in 2020. These revised
forecasts support Fitch reverting back to the 1.5 and 1.0 ERF
floors described in Fitch's "U.S. RMBS Loan Loss Model Criteria."

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Fitch incorporates a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate how the
ratings would react to steeper market value declines (MVDs) than
assumed at the MSA level. Sensitivity analyses was conducted at the
state and national levels to assess the effect of higher MVDs for
the subject pool as well as lower MVDs, illustrated by a gain in
home prices.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to a negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- This defined negative rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates
    how the ratings would react to steeper MVDs at the national
    level. The analysis assumes MVDs of 10.0%, 20.0% and 30.0% in
    addition to the model-projected 40.0% at 'AAA'. The analysis
    indicates that there is some potential rating migration with
    higher MVDs for all rated classes, compared with the model
    projection. Specifically, a 10% additional decline in home
    prices would lower all rated classes by one full category.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to a positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- This defined positive rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates
    how the ratings would react to positive home price growth of
    10% with no assumed overvaluation. Excluding the senior class,
    which is already rated 'AAAsf', the analysis indicates there
    is potential positive rating migration for all of the rated
    classes. Specifically, a 10% gain in home prices would result
    in a full category upgrade for the rated class excluding those
    being assigned ratings of 'AAAsf'.

This section provides insight into the model-implied sensitivities
the transaction faces when one assumption is modified, while
holding others equal. The modeling process uses the modification of
these variables to reflect asset performance in up- and down
environments. The results should only be considered as one
potential outcome, as the transaction is exposed to multiple
dynamic risk factors. It should not be used as an indicator of
possible future performance.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance
transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as
the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings
are based on historical performance.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Fitch was provided with Form ABS Due Diligence-15E (Form 15E) as
prepared by SitusAMC, Clayton, Digital Risk, Covius, Inglet Blair,
and Opus. The third-party due diligence described in Form 15E
focused on four areas: compliance review, credit review, valuation
review, and data integrity. Fitch considered this information in
its analysis and, as a result, Fitch did not make any adjustment(s)
to its analysis.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch relied on an independent third-party due diligence review
performed on 100% of the pool. The third-party due diligence was
generally consistent with Fitch's "U.S. RMBS Rating Criteria."
SitusAMC, Clayton, Digital Risk, Covius, Inglet Blair, and Opus
were engaged to perform the review. Loans reviewed under this
engagement were given compliance, credit and valuation grades and
assigned initial grades for each subcategory. Minimal exceptions
and waivers were noted in the due diligence reports. Refer to the
Third-Party Due Diligence section for more detail.

Fitch also utilized data files provided by the issuer on its SEC
Rule 17g-5 designated website. Fitch received loan-level
information based on the ResiPLS data layout format, and the data
are considered comprehensive. The data contained in the ResiPLS
layout data tape were reviewed by the due diligence companies, and
no material discrepancies were noted.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


JUNIPER RECEIVABLES 2019-1: Moody's Ups A Notes Rating From Ba2
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded ten securities from seven
prime transactions issued in 2017, 2019 and 2020. The notes are
backed by a pool of retail automobile loan contracts originated by
Ally Bank, who is also the servicer for these transactions. Ally
Bank is a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Ally Financial Inc.
(Ba1, Stable).

The complete rating actions are as follows:

Issuer: Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-1

Class D Notes, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2020
Upgraded to Aa2 (sf)

Issuer: Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-3

Class C Notes, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2020
Upgraded to Aa1 (sf)

Class D Notes, Upgraded to Aa1 (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2020
Upgraded to Aa3 (sf)

Issuer: Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2019-4

Class B Notes, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2020
Upgraded to Aa1 (sf)

Class C Notes, Upgraded to Aaa (sf); previously on Dec 17, 2020
Upgraded to Aa3 (sf)

Class D Notes, Upgraded to Aa3 (sf); previously on Dec 11, 2019
Definitive Rating Assigned Baa1 (sf)

Issuer: Juniper Receivables 2019-1 DAC

Class A Asset Backed Notes, Upgraded to Baa3 (sf); previously on
Sep 11, 2020 Downgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Issuer: Juniper Receivables 2019-2 DAC

Class A Asset Backed Notes, Upgraded to Baa3 (sf); previously on
Sep 11, 2020 Downgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Issuer: Juniper Receivables 2020-1 DAC

Class A Asset Backed Notes, Upgraded to Baa3 (sf); previously on
Sep 11, 2020 Downgraded to Ba2 (sf)

Issuer: Juniper Receivables DAC

Class A Asset Backed Notes, Upgraded to Baa1 (sf); previously on
Sep 11, 2020 Downgraded to Baa2 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

For the deals issued by Ally Auto Receivables Trust (AART), the
actions resulted from the buildup of credit enhancement due to
non-declining reserve accounts, overcollateralization, and the
sequential pay structure of the transactions. For the deals issued
by Juniper Receivables DAC (Juniper), the actions primarily
resulted from Moody's updated loss expectations on the underlying
pools.

Moody's lifetime cumulative net loss expectation range between
0.85% to 1.00% for AART deals and 3.00% - 3.50% for the Juniper
transactions The loss expectations reflect updated performance
trends on the underlying pools. Although borrowers have been
affected by a slowdown in the US economic activity due to the
coronavirus outbreak, more recently US consumers have shown a high
degree of resilience owing to the government stimulus and the
relief options offered by servicers.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of consumer assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in US economic activity. Specifically, for auto loan ABS,
loan performance will continue to benefit from government support
and the improving unemployment rate that will support the
borrower's income and their ability to service debt. However, any
softening of used vehicle prices will reduce recoveries on
defaulted auto loans. Furthermore, any elevated use of borrower
assistance programs, such as extensions, may adversely impact
scheduled cash flows to bondholders.

Moody's regard the COVID-19 outbreak as a social risk under Moody's
ESG framework, given the substantial implications for public health
and safety.

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Auto Loan- and Lease-Backed ABS" published in
December 2020.

Factors that would lead to an upgrade or downgrade of the ratings:

Up

Levels of credit protection that are greater than necessary to
protect investors against current expectations of loss could lead
to an upgrade of the ratings. Losses could decline from Moody's
original expectations as a result of a lower number of obligor
defaults or greater recoveries from the value of the vehicles
securing the obligors promise of payment. The US job market and the
market for used vehicles are also primary drivers of the
transaction's performance. Other reasons for better-than-expected
performance include changes in servicing practices to maximize
collections on the loans or refinancing opportunities that result
in a prepayment of the loan.

Down

Levels of credit protection that are insufficient to protect
investors against current expectations of loss could lead to a
downgrade of the ratings. Losses could increase from Moody's
original expectations as a result of a higher number of obligor
defaults or a deterioration in the value of the vehicles securing
the obligors promise of payment. The US job market and the market
for used vehicles are also primary drivers of the transaction's
performance. Other reasons for worse-than-expected performance
include poor servicing, error on the part of transaction parties,
lack of transactional governance and fraud.


KKR CLO 33: S&P Assigns Prelim BB- (sf) Rating on Class E Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to KKR CLO 33
Ltd./KKR CLO 33 LLC 's floating-rate notes.

The note issuance is a CLO securitization governed by investment
criteria and backed primarily by broadly syndicated
speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' and lower) senior secured term loans
that are governed by collateral quality tests The transaction is
managed by KKR Financial Advisors II LLC.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of May 21,
2021. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings reflect:

-- The diversification of the collateral pool;

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization;

-- The experience of the collateral manager's team, which can
affect the rated notes' performance through collateral selection,
ongoing portfolio management, and trading; and

-- The transaction's legal structure, which is expected to be
bankruptcy remote.

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  KKR CLO 33 Ltd./KKR CLO 33 LLC

  Class A, $240.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, $64.00 million: AA (sf)
  Class C (deferrable), $24.00 million: A (sf)
  Class D (deferrable), $24.00 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class E (deferrable), $15.00 million: BB- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $39.05 million: Not rated



LOANCORE 2019-CRE3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on Class F Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed the ratings on the following classes of
floating-rate notes issued by LoanCore 2019-CRE3 Issuer Ltd.:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction.

At issuance, the pool consisted of 22 floating rate mortgages
secured by 38 mostly transitional properties with a cumulative
balance of $415.9 million, excluding $60.7 million of future
funding commitments and $52.2 million of funded companion
participations held outside the Trust. The transaction is
structured with a Funded Companion Acquisition Period, where the
Issuer may acquire funded Future Funding Participations and Funded
Companion Participations with principal repayment proceeds. This
period is scheduled to end with the May 2021 Payment Date. As of
the April 2021 remittance, the trust consists of 15 loans with an
aggregate principal balance of $364.3 million, representing a
collateral reduction of 12.4% since issuance, with approximately
$25.3 million in unfunded future funding commitments outstanding.
All loans in the pool represent pari passu notes securitized in the
LoanCore 2019-CRE2 transaction, also rated by DBRS Morningstar.

According to the April 2021 remittance, there are no loans in
special servicing and one loan (2.9% of the pool) on the servicer's
watchlist. The loan on the servicer's watchlist, The Cigar Factory
(Prospectus ID#17, 2.9% of the pool) was flagged for upcoming
maturity in June 2021; however, the loan contains two additional
12-month extension options available to the borrower. Five loans,
representing 30.5% of the pool, were modified in 2020 due to
complications arising from the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
pandemic. The largest modified loan, Florida Retail Portfolio
(Prospectus ID#3, 13.0% of the pool), secured by seven
cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted shopping centers
throughout Orlando and South Florida, was modified in August 2020.
The loan modification permitted the borrower to provide rent relief
to small and medium-sized tenants without lender consent,
reallocated $683,000 from a tax reserve into a cash collateral
account, and extended the borrower's obligation to fund approved
renovation expenses totaling $525,000 from April 2020 to September
2020. The loan continues to perform well despite the impact from
the pandemic and all tenants at each collateral property are open
with collections stabilizing to prepandemic levels. As of November
2020, the loan reported a trailing-11-month (T-11) debt service
coverage ratio (DSCR) of 1.72 times (x) with an occupancy rate of
78%.

The 183 Madison Avenue loan (Prospectus ID#2, 16.5% of the pool) is
secured by a 265,367 square foot (sf) office property in Midtown
Manhattan. The borrower initially requested a three-month
forbearance at the onset of the pandemic in May 2020; however, the
year-end (YE) 2020 business plan update provided by the collateral
manager noted that no loan modification, forbearance, or other debt
service relief was ultimately provided. The property has exposure
to WeWork, Inc. (11.7% of the net rentable area (NRA); lease
expires May 2035) and its ground-floor retail tenant, DomUS Design
Center (Domus; 7.9% of NRA), vacated at lease expiry in June 2020.
Domus had been paying well-below market rent and the sponsor's
business plan contemplated repurposing the retail space into
smaller units to achieve higher rents. The office portion of the
collateral was 90% occupied as of YE2020; however, the pandemic has
delayed the lease-up of the vacant retail space and has impacted
cash flow. As of November 2020, the loan reported a T-11 DSCR of
0.93x with an occupancy rate of 80.3%. DBRS Morningstar analyzed
this loan with an elevated probability of default to reflect the
loan's current risk profile.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



MARBLE POINT XX: S&P Assigns BB-(sf) Rating on $14MM Class E Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned ratings to Marble Point CLO XX
Ltd./Marble Point CLO XX LLC's floating-rate notes.

The note issuance is a CLO securitization governed by investment
criteria and backed primarily by broadly syndicated
speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' or lower) senior secured term loans.
The transaction is managed by Marble Point CLO Management LLC.

The ratings reflect:

-- The diversification of the collateral pool;

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization;

-- The experience of the collateral manager's team, which can
affect the performance of the rated notes through collateral
selection, ongoing portfolio management, and trading; and

-- The transaction's legal structure, which is expected to be
bankruptcy remote.

  Ratings Assigned

  Marble Point CLO XX Ltd./Marble Point CLO XX LLC

  Class A, $248.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, $56.00 million: AA (sf)
  Class C (deferrable), $24.00 million: A (sf)
  Class D-1 (deferrable), $16.00 million: BBB+ (sf)
  Class D-2 (deferrable), $8.00 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class E (deferrable), $14.00 million: BB- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $42.60 million: Not rated



MVW 2021-1W: S&P Assigns BB (sf) Rating on $31.225MM Class D Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to MVW 2021-1W LLC's
timeshare loan-backed notes.

The note issuance is an ABS transaction backed by vacation
ownership interval (timeshare) loans.

S&P said, "To reflect the uncertain and weakened U.S. economic and
sector outlook, in early 2020 we increased our base-case default
assumption by 1.25x to stress defaults from 'B' to 'BB' rating
scenarios. In addition to our base rating stress, to reflect
additional liquidity stress from deferrals and potential increase
in delinquencies, we also considered incremental liquidity and
sensitivity stress in all rating categories.

"The ratings reflect our opinion of the credit enhancement that is
available in the form of overcollateralization, the subordination
for the class A, B, C, and D notes, the reserve account, and the
available excess spread. The ratings are also based on our opinion
of Marriott Ownership Resorts Inc.'s servicing ability and
experience in the timeshare market."

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

  Ratings Assigned

  MVW 2021-1W LLC

  Class A, $206.863 million: AAA (sf)
  Class B, $106.900 million: A (sf)
  Class C, $80.012 million: BBB (sf)
  Class D, $31.225 million: BB (sf)



NLT 2021-INV1: S&P Assigns Prelim B (sf) Rating on Class B-2 Certs
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to NLT
2021-INV1's mortgage pass-through certificates series 2021-INV1.

The certificate issuance is an RMBS transaction backed by an
aggregate pool comprised of 937 predominantly newly originated,
fixed-rate and adjustable-rate (some with interest-only feature),
business purpose, investor, fully-amortizing residential mortgage
loans that are secured by first liens on primarily one- to
four-family residential properties, planned unit developments,
condominiums, and townhouses with 30-year original terms to
maturity to non-conforming (both prime and nonprime) borrowers. All
the loans are exempt from the qualified mortgage/ability-to-repay
rules.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of May 24,
2021. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings reflect S&P's view of:

-- The pool's collateral composition;
-- The credit enhancement provided for this transaction;
-- The transaction's associated structural mechanics;
-- The representation and warranty framework for this
transaction;
-- The mortgage aggregator and mortgage originators;
-- The geographic concentration; and
-- The impact the COVID-19 pandemic will likely have on the
performance of the mortgage borrowers in the pool and liquidity
available in the transaction.

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  NLT 2021-INV1(i)

  Class A-1, $130,003,000: AAA (sf)
  Class A-2, $11,819,000: AA (sf)
  Class A-3, $21,811,000: A (sf)
  Class M-1, $10,762,000: BBB (sf)
  Class B-1, $8,455,000: BB (sf)
  Class B-2, $5,477,000: B (sf)
  Class B-3, $3,844,129: Not rated
  Class A-IO-S, notional(ii): Not rated
  Class XS, notional(ii): Not rated
  Class R, not applicable: Not rated

(i)The collateral and structural information in this report
reflects the term sheet dated May 19, 2021. The preliminary ratings
address the ultimate payment of interest and principal.
(ii)Notional amount certificates that do not have class principal
balances. The notional amount will equal the aggregate stated
principal balance of the mortgage loans as of the first day of the
related due period.



OPORTUN ISSUANCE 2021-B: DBRS Finalizes BB(high) Rating on D Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following notes
issued by Oportun Issuance Trust 2021-B (Oportun 2021-B or the
Issuer):

-- $340,153,000 Class A Notes at AA (low) (sf)
-- $71,611,000 Class B Notes at A (low) (sf)
-- $52,430,000 Class C Notes at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $35,806,000 Class D Notes at BB (high) (sf)

The ratings on the Notes are based on DBRS Morningstar's review of
the following considerations:

(1) The transaction's assumptions consider DBRS Morningstar's set
of macroeconomic scenarios for select economies related to the
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), available in its commentary "Global
Macroeconomic Scenarios: March 2021 Update," published on March 17,
2021. DBRS Morningstar initially published macroeconomic scenarios
on April 16, 2020, which have been regularly updated. The scenarios
were last updated on March 17, 2021, and are reflected in DBRS
Morningstar's rating analysis.

(2) The assumptions consider the moderate macroeconomic scenario
outlined in the commentary, with the moderate scenario serving as
the primary anchor for the current rating. The moderate scenario
factors in increasing success in containment during the first half
of 2021, enabling the continued relaxation of restrictions.

-- DBRS Morningstar's projected losses include an additional
stress due to the potential impact of the coronavirus. The DBRS
Morningstar cumulative net loss assumption is 11.38% based on the
worst-case loss pool constructed, giving consideration to the
concentration limits present in the structure.

-- DBRS Morningstar incorporated a hardship deferment stress into
its analysis as a result of an increase in utilization related to
the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on borrowers. DBRS
Morningstar stressed hardship deferments to test liquidity risk
early in the life of the transaction's cash flows.

(3) The transaction's form and sufficiency of available credit
enhancement.

-- Credit enhancement is in the form of overcollateralization,
subordination, amounts held in the Reserve Account, and excess
spread. Credit enhancement levels are sufficient to support DBRS
Morningstar's stressed assumptions under various stress scenarios.

(4) The ability of the transaction to withstand stressed cash flow
assumptions and repay investors according to the terms under which
they have invested. For this transaction, the ratings address the
timely payment of interest on a monthly basis and principal by the
legal final payment date.

(5) Oportun's capabilities with regard to originations,
underwriting, and servicing.

(6) The experience, underwriting, and origination capabilities of
MetaBank, N.A.

(7) The ability of Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. (SST) to
perform duties as a Back-Up Servicer. SST, as Back-Up Servicer, is
required to take over as successor servicer of the collateral in
the Oportun 2021-A transaction within 15 calendar days of notice of
a servicing termination event. SST and Oportun have developed a
detailed servicing transition plan to facilitate an orderly
transfer of servicing.

(8) On March 3, 2021, Oportun received a Civil Investigative Demand
(CID) from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The
stated purpose of the CID is to determine whether small-dollar
lenders or associated persons, in connection with lending and
debt-collection practices, have not been in compliance with certain
federal consumer protection laws over which the CFPB has
jurisdiction.

-- Oportun and PF Servicing believe that their practices have been
in full compliance with CFPB guidance and that they have followed
all published authority with respect to their practices, and
Oportun continues to cooperate with the CFPB with respect to this
matter. At this time, the Seller is unable to predict the outcome
of this CFPB investigation, including whether the investigation
will result in any action or proceeding or in any changes to the
Seller's or the Servicer's practices.

(8) The legal structure and legal opinions address the true sale of
the unsecured consumer loans, the nonconsolidation of the trust,
and that the trust has a valid perfected security interest in the
assets and consistency with the DBRS Morningstar "Legal Criteria
for U.S. Structured Finance."

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



PALMER SQUARE 2018-3: S&P Affirms B-(sf) Rating on Class E-R2 Notes
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to the class A-1a-3, A2-R3,
B-R3, and C-R3 replacement notes from Palmer Square CLO 2018-3 Ltd.
At the same time, S&P withdrew its ratings on the previously
refinanced class A-1a-2, A2-R2, B-R2, and C-R2 notes and affirmed
the ratings on the class D-R2 and E-R2 notes. S&P did not rate the
class A-1b-2 notes and are not rating the class A-1b-3 notes.

Palmer Square CLO 2018-3 Ltd. is a CLO that is managed by Palmer
Square Capital Management. It was originally issued in 2013 as
Palmer Square CLO 2013-3 Ltd. This transaction was previously
refinanced in 2017 and 2018.

The replacement notes were issued via a supplemental indenture,
which, in addition to outlining the terms of the replacement notes,
will also:

-- Include LIBOR replacement terms; and
-- Extend the non-call period until April 2022.

  Replacement And Original Note Issuances

  Replacement notes

  Class A-1a-3, $280.1 million: LIBOR+1.00%
  Class A-1b-3, $10.2 million: LIBOR+1.30%
  Class A2-R3, $51.4 million: LIBOR+1.50%
  Class B-R3, $27.2 million: LIBOR+1.85%
  Class C-R3, $22.5 million: LIBOR+2.70%

  Original notes

  Class A-1a-2, $280.1 million: LIBOR+1.20%
  Class A-1b-2, $10.2 million: LIBOR+1.45%
  Class A2-R2, $51.4 million: LIBOR+1.75%
  Class B-R2, $27.2 million: LIBOR+2.20%
  Class C-R2, $22.5 million: LIBOR+3.20%

S&P said, "Our review of this transaction included a cash flow
analysis, based on the portfolio and transaction data in the
trustee report, to estimate future performance. In line with our
criteria, our cash flow scenarios applied forward-looking
assumptions on the expected timing and pattern of defaults, and
recoveries upon default, under various interest rate and
macroeconomic scenarios. Our analysis also considered the
transaction's ability to pay timely interest and/or ultimate
principal to each of the rated tranches.

"We will continue to review whether, in our view, the ratings
assigned to the notes remain consistent with the credit enhancement
available to support them, and we will take rating actions as we
deem necessary."

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

  Ratings Assigned

  Palmer Square CLO 2018-3 Ltd.

  Replacement class A-1a-3, $280.1 million: AAA (sf)
  Replacement class A-1b-3, $10.2 million: NR
  Replacement class A2-R3, $51.4 million: AA (sf)
  Replacement class B-R3, $27.2 million: A (sf)
  Replacement class C-R3, $22.5 million: BBB- (sf)

  Ratings Affirmed

  Palmer Square CLO 2018-3 Ltd.

  Class D-R2: BB- (sf)
  Class E-R2: B- (sf)

  Ratings Withdrawn

  Palmer Square CLO 2018-3 Ltd.

  Class A-1a-2: to NR from AAA (sf)
  Class A2-R2: to NR from AA (sf)
  Class B-R2: to NR from A (sf)
  Class C-R2: to NR from BBB- (sf)

  NR--Not rated.



PIKES PEAK 6: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating to Class F-R Notes
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to six classes of
CLO refinancing notes issued by Pikes Peak CLO 6 (the "Issuer").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$189,100,000 Class A-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due
2034 (the "Class A-R Notes"), Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$42,700,000 Class B-R Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due 2034
(the "Class B-R Notes"), Assigned Aa2 (sf)

US$15,250,000 Class C-R Mezzanine Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034 (the "Class C-R Notes"), Assigned A2 (sf)

US$18,300,000 Class D-R Mezzanine Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034 (the "Class D-R Notes"), Assigned Baa3 (sf)

US$13,725,000 Class E-R Mezzanine Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034 (the "Class E-R Notes"), Assigned Ba3 (sf)

US$4,575,000 Class F-R Mezzanine Secured Deferrable Floating Rate
Notes due 2034 (the "Class F-R Notes"), Assigned B3 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks particularly those associated with the
CLO's portfolio and structure.

The Issuer is a managed cash flow collateralized loan obligation
(CLO). The issued notes are collateralized primarily by a portfolio
of broadly syndicated senior secured corporate loans. At least 90%
of the portfolio must consist of first lien senior secured loans,
cash, and eligible investments, and up to 10% of the portfolio may
consist of second-lien loans, unsecured loans and permitted
securities that are senior secured bonds, senior unsecured bonds
and senior secured notes; provided that no more than 5% of the
portfolio may consist of second-lien loans or permitted
securities.

Partners Group US Management CLO LLC (the "Manager") will continue
to direct the selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets
on behalf of the Issuer and may engage in trading activity,
including discretionary trading, during the transaction's extended
five year reinvestment period. Thereafter, subject to certain
restrictions, the Manager may reinvest unscheduled principal
payments and proceeds from sales of credit risk assets.

In addition to the issuance of the Refinancing Notes, a variety of
other changes to transaction features will occur in connection with
the refinancing. These include: extension of the reinvestment
period; extensions of the stated maturity and non-call period;
changes to certain collateral quality tests; and changes to the
overcollateralization test levels; the inclusion of Libor
replacement provisions; additions to the CLO's ability to hold
workout and restructured assets; changes to the definition of
"Adjusted Weighted Average Moody's Rating Factor" and changes to
the base matrix and modifiers.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in Section 2.3.2.1
of the "Moody's Global Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan
Obligations" rating methodology published in December 2020.

The key model inputs Moody's used in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score and weighted
average recovery rate, are based on its published methodology and
could differ from the trustee's reported numbers. For modeling
purposes, Moody's used the following base-case assumptions:

Performing par and principal proceeds balance: $305,000,000

Diversity Score: 65

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2808

Weighted Average Spread (WAS): 3.20%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 47.5%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 9 years

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of corporate assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in U.S. economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under
Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the Refinancing Notes is subject to uncertainty.
The performance of the Refinancing Notes is sensitive to the
performance of the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on
economic and credit conditions that may change. The Manager's
investment decisions and management of the transaction will also
affect the performance of the Refinancing Notes.


READY CAPITAL 2019-FL3: DBRS Confirms B(low) Rating on F Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited upgraded its ratings on the Commercial Mortgage-Backed
Notes, Series 2019-FL3 issued by Ready Capital Mortgage Financing
2019-FL3 as follows:

-- Class B to AA (sf) from AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C to A (sf) from A (low) (sf)
-- Class D to BBB (sf) from BBB (low) (sf)

In addition, DBRS Morningstar confirmed its ratings on the
remaining classes as follows:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class E at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The upgrades generally reflect the significantly improved credit
support for the rated bonds as a result of collateral reduction for
the pool overall, as well as DBRS Morningstar's generally positive
outlook for the transaction's performance over the remaining term.

At issuance, the collateral consisted of 43 floating-rate mortgages
secured by 44 transitional properties totaling approximately $320.8
million, excluding approximately $101.3 million of future funding
commitments held outside the trust. As of the April 2021
remittance, 25 loans remain in the pool with a trust balance of
$255.9 million, representing a collateral reduction of 20.2% since
issuance.

There are seven loans, representing 20.6% of the current trust
balance, on the servicer's watchlist as of the April 2021
remittance. The service is monitoring these loans for reporting a
low debt service coverage ratio (DSCR). Additionally, the pool has
three loans, representing 11.4% of the pool, in special servicing:
StarCity 229 Ellis (Prospectus ID#11, 5.7% of the pool), Tapestry
by Hilton Daytona Beach (Prospectus ID#22, 3.5%), and 2850 Greene
Street (Prospectus ID#18, 2.2%).

Tapestry by Hilton Daytona Beach is the only loan in the pool
secured by a lodging property and was transferred to special
servicing in April 2020. The loan collateral is a 110-key
limited-service hotel in Daytona Beach, Florida. The property,
which was previously flagged as a Lexington Inn & Suites, is in the
midst of a $4.3 million ($39,000 per key) property improvement plan
(PIP) to convert the property's flag to a Tapestry by Hilton. A
20-year franchise agreement with Hilton was executed in June 2017,
and renovations were expected to take approximately 18 months from
issuance. However, in April 2020, the borrower reached out to the
servicer about a forbearance and requested the authorization to
pause bookings for all the rooms at the property to speed up the
remaining renovations and reduce expenses. At that time,
renovations were roughly 42% complete. An updated as-is value of
$15.9 million was provided in August 2020, up from the $8.3 million
as-is value at issuance. According to the servicer's April 2021
site inspection, the renovations for the guest rooms appeared
largely complete, with only common area improvements outstanding.
According to an online search as of May 2021, the property remains
closed and is set to open at the end of July 2021. DBRS Morningstar
analyzed this loan with an elevated probability of default (PoD) to
reflect the ongoing concerns in the delayed stabilization for the
collateral property. However, the overall risks for this loan are
moderate given the significant investment in the property since
issuance and the property's location in Florida, which should
enable it to capture travel demand as the vaccination rate
continues to climb and the effects of the Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) pandemic continue to ease.

DBRS Morningstar is also closely monitoring the 2850 Greene Street
loan. The loan is secured by a 61,587-sf Class B industrial flex
property in Hollywood, Florida. The loan transferred to special
servicing in May 2020 for delinquency, but was later brought
current in 2021. The initial delinquency was attributed to
struggles of the property's sole tenant, Silver Airways (48.1% of
the net rentable area (NRA) through September 2027), which was
reportedly unable to meet rental obligations amid the pandemic. The
borrower signed another tenant, United Hardware Supply (45.0% of
the NRA through September 2025), in September 2020, successfully
leasing up the majority of the building. According to updates
provided by the servicer, both tenants were fully operating at the
property and paying rent as of October 2020.

As of the April 2021 reporting, the loan is showing as current but
remains with the special servicer as a nonperforming matured
balloon as the loan did not repay at the initial maturity date of
October 2020. An updated as-is value of $8.7 million was provided
in November 2020, up 13.0% from the issuance as-is value of $7.7
million. According to servicer commentary, the borrower brought the
loan current in order to discuss workout strategies, and, although
a maturity extension was fully negotiated, the servicer confirmed
that the modification failed to close and foreclosure was filed in
March 2021. Given the breakdown in maturity negotiations and the
uncertainty surrounding the failure to execute the loan
modification, this loan was also analyzed with an elevated PoD to
increase the expected loss. However, DBRS Morningstar also notes
that the updated value as of November 2020 is well above the loan's
total exposure, suggesting the likelihood of a loss to the subject
trust is generally low.

DBRS Morningstar materially deviated from its North American CMBS
Insight Model when determining the rating assigned to Class E and F
as the quantitative results suggested a higher rating. The material
deviation is warranted given the uncertain loan-level event risk
with the loans in special servicing and on the servicer's
watchlist.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



REAL ESTATE 2019-1: DBRS Confirms B(sf) Rating on Class G Certs
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited confirmed all ratings on the Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2019-1 issued by Real Estate
Asset Liquidity Trust, Series 2019-1 as follows:

-- Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-2 at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (sf)
-- Class X at A (high) (sf)
-- Class C at A (sf) (sf)
-- Class D-1 at BBB (sf)
-- Class D-2 at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (sf)
-- Class G at B (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which remains in line with DBRS Morningstar's
expectations. As of the April 2021 remittance, 47 of the original
48 loans remain in the pool, with an aggregate trust balance of
$413.6 million, representing a collateral reduction of 7.3% since
issuance as a result of scheduled loan amortization and the
repayment of a single loan.

The transaction displays a heavy property type concentration as 21
loans, representing 51.3% of the current trust balance, are secured
by retail assets, while five loans, representing 20.9% of the
current trust balance, are secured by office properties. All loans
in the pool are amortizing through their respective loan terms,
while 27 loans, representing 58.9% of the current trust balance,
benefit from some level of meaningful recourse to the loan's
sponsor.

According to the April 2021 remittance report, no loans are in
special servicing nor delinquent but six loans are on the
servicer's watchlist, representing 24.0% of the current trust
balance. All six of these loans have been affected by the ongoing
difficulties caused by the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic.
Four of these loans, representing 11.7% of the current trust
balance, received various forms of short-term forbearances and are
making payments based on the terms of their respective
forbearances. The remaining two loans, representing 12.3% of the
current trust balance, were permitted to utilize leasing reserves
to cover shortfalls and it does not appear these funds will be
required to be replenished.

The largest loan in the pool, WSP Place (Prospectus ID#1; 8.5% of
the current trust) is secured by a 184,707-square foot office
property in downtown Edmonton. The loan was added to the servicer's
watchlist in May 2020, as the borrower, who serves as the full
recourse entity, requested coronavirus-related payment relief. In
lieu of a short-term forbearance, the borrower was permitted to
utilize leasing reserves to cover payments through July 2020. While
the servicer indicated these funds were to be replenished between
January 2021 and April 2021, no collections were made during this
period as the leasing reserves balance has remained at $263,651.
The borrower also fell delinquent on the payment of property taxes,
although all outstanding amounts from 2020 were paid as of January
2021 and only the assessed late fees remain. Finally, the servicer
has noted that there are two liens for work done on the building
that were being disputed by the borrower that will likely be
settled in court.

The property lost its third-largest tenant at issuance, AIMCo (8.5%
of the net rentable area (NRA)), which vacated upon its lease
expiration in December 2019, leaving the property 82.0% occupied.
With a high vacancy rate within the subject's submarket and the
ongoing effects of the pandemic, DBRS Morningstar is monitoring the
two largest tenants, WSP Canada Inc. (WSP) (36.4% of the NRA,
expiring July 2026) and Alberta Health Servicers (23.6% of the NRA,
expiring September 2021). While the servicer has given no
indication of either tenant's plans to vacate, WSP retains the
right to terminate its lease with 12 months' notice at the end of
the 2021 or 2023, subject to $3.0 million and $2.0 million
termination fees, respectively. Alberta Health Services, meanwhile,
has no renewal options but has been a tenant at the subject since
October 2004. In 2015, the borrower completed a $40.0 million
renovation aimed at elevating the property's status to Class A in
order to be more competitive in a potentially oversupplied market.
DBRS Morningstar has requested a number of updates from the
servicer, including updates on the leasing reserve, delinquent
taxes, disputed liens, and tenant information.

Notes: The principal methodology is the North American CMBS
Surveillance Methodology (March 26, 2021), which can be found on
dbrsmorningstar.com under Methodologies & Criteria. For a list of
the structured-finance-related methodologies that may be used
during the rating process, please see the DBRS Morningstar Global
Structured Finance Related Methodologies document, which can be
found on dbrsmorningstar.com in the Commentary tab under Regulatory
Affairs. Please note that not every related methodology listed
under a principal structured finance asset class methodology may be
used to rate or monitor an individual structured finance or debt
obligation.


SCMT 2021-SBC10: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on Class F Certs
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following
classes of Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates issued by
SCMT 2021-SBC10:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at B (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

RATING DESCRIPTION

The collateral consists of 297 individual loans and three crossed
loan pools secured by 316 commercial and multifamily properties
with an average loan balance of $775,329. DBRS Morningstar analyzed
the transaction as a 300-loan pool because of
cross-collateralization in the pool, and all metrics within this
report reflect this pool size. The transaction is configured with a
modified pro rata pay pass-through structure. Given the complexity
of the structure and granularity of the pool, DBRS Morningstar
applied its North American CMBS Multi-Borrower Rating Methodology
(CMBS Methodology) and the RMBS Insight 1.3: U.S. Residential
Mortgage-Backed Securities Model and Rating Methodology (RMBS
Methodology).

CMBS Methodology

Of the 300 loans, 172 loans, representing 71.3% of the pool, have a
fixed interest rate with a straight average of 6.6%. The
floating-rate loans have interest rate floors (excluding rate
margins) ranging from 0.00% to 5.50% with a straight average of
1.45% and interest rate margins ranging from 0.75% to 5.20% with a
straight average of 3.20%. To determine the probability of default
(POD) and loss given default (LGD) inputs in the CMBS Insight
Model, DBRS Morningstar applied a stress to the various indexes
that corresponded with the remaining fully extended term of the
loans and added the respective contractual loan spread to determine
a stressed interest rate over the loan term. DBRS Morningstar
looked to the greater of the interest rate floor or the DBRS
Morningstar stressed index rate when calculating stressed debt
service. The weighted-average (WA) modeled coupon rate was 6.50%.
The loans have original term lengths of five to 386 months and
amortize over periods of 120 to 429 months. When the cut-off loan
balances were measured against the DBRS Morningstar Net Cash Flow
(NCF) and their respective actual constants or stressed interest
rates, there were 80 loans, representing 33.2% of the pool, with
term DSCRs below 1.15x, a threshold indicative of a higher
likelihood of term default.

The pool has a WA original term length of 207 months, or 17.3
years, with a WA remaining term of 77 months, or 6.4 years. Based
on the current loan amount, which reflects 47.4% amortization, and
the current valuation, the pool has a WA loan-to-value ratio (LTV)
of 39.1%. DBRS Morningstar applied a pool average LTV of 47.6%,
which reflects a recent appraised value for four loans, a more
recently obtained BOV for loans in more urban markets, and the
lesser of the updated broker's opinion of value (BOV) or the
original appraised value for loans in all other markets.
Furthermore, DBRS Morningstar made LTV adjustments to 34 loans that
had an implied capitalization rate more than 200 basis points lower
than a set of minimal capitalization rates established by DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank. The DBRS Morningstar minimal
capitalization rates range from 5.0% for properties in Market Rank
8 to 8.0% for properties in Market Rank 1. Lastly, 196 loans fully
amortize over their respective remaining loan terms, resulting in a
56.6% expected amortization; this amount of amortization is greater
than typical of commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS)
conduit pools. DBRS Morningstar's research indicates that, for CMBS
conduit transactions securitized between 2000 and 2019, average
amortization by year has ranged between 7.50% to 21.09%, with an
overall median of 18.80%.

As contemplated and explained in DBRS Morningstar's Rating North
American CMBS Interest-Only Certificates methodology, the most
significant risk to an interest-only (IO) cash flow stream is term
default risk. As noted in that methodology, for a pool of
approximately 63,000 CMBS loans that fully cycled through to their
maturity dates, DBRS Morningstar noted that the average total
default rate across all property types was approximately 17%, the
refinance default rate was 6% (approximately one third of the total
rate), and the term default rate was approximately 11%. DBRS
Morningstar recognizes the muted impact of refinance risk on IOs by
adjusting the IO rating up by one notch from the Reference
Obligation rating. When using the 10-year Idealized Default Table
default probability to derive a POD for a CMBS bond from its
rating, DBRS Morningstar estimates that, in general, a one-third
reduction in the CMBS Reference Obligation POD maps to a tranche
rating that is approximately one notch higher than the Reference
Obligation or the Applicable Reference Obligation, whichever is
appropriate. Therefore, following similar logic regarding term
default risk supported the rationale for DBRS Morningstar to reduce
the POD in the CMBS Insight Model by one notch because refinance
risk is largely absent for this pool of loans. DBRS Morningstar
reduced this one notch adjustment by 43.5%, reflecting the portion
of the pool that does not fully amortize.

RMBS Methodology

The DBRS Morningstar CMBS Insight Model does not contemplate the
ability to prepay loans, which is generally seen as credit positive
because a prepaid loan cannot default.

DBRS Morningstar calibrated the CMBS predictive model using loans
that have prepayment lockout features. Those loans' historical
prepayment performance is close to 0 constant prepayment rate
(CPR). If the CMBS predictive model had an expectation of
prepayments, DBRS Morningstar would expect the default levels to be
reduced. Any loan that prepays is removed from the pool and can no
longer default. This collateral pool does not have any prepayment
lockout features. DBRS Morningstar expects that this pool will
continue to have some prepayments over the remainder of the
transaction. DBRS Morningstar applied the following to calculate a
default rate prepayment haircut: using Intex Dealmaker, DBRS
Morningstar calculated a lifetime constant default rate (CDR) that
approximated the default rate for each rating category. While
applying the same lifetime CDR, DBRS Morningstar applied a 2.0%
CPR. When holding the CDR constant and applying 2.0% CPR, the
cumulative default amount declined. The percentage change in the
cumulative default before and after applying the prepayments was
then applied to the cumulative default assumption to calculate a
fully adjusted cumulative default assumption.

The fully adjusted default assumption and model generated severity
figures from the DBRS Morningstar CMBS Insight Model. DBRS
Morningstar then applied these severity figures to the RMBS Cash
Flow Model, which is adept at modeling pro rata structures.
Historically, pools similar to this have had a CPR ranging from a
low of approximately 5% to just above 25%, with a linear trend
between 10% and 15%. As part of the RMBS Cash Flow Model, DBRS
Morningstar incorporated three CPR stresses: 5.0%, 10.0%, and
15.0%.
Additional assumptions in the RMBS Cash Flow Model include a
six-month recovery lag period, 100% servicer advancing, and three
default curves (uniform, front, and back). DBRS Morningstar based
the shape and duration of the default curves on the RMBS seasoned
loss curves; however, it adjusted the timing to consider the
recovery lag period. Lastly, DBRS Morningstar stressed interest
rates, both upward and downward, based on their respective loan
indexes, including the one-, three-, five-, and seven-year Constant
Maturity Treasury, one-month commercial paper, prime, five-year
swap, and 10-year swap.

Overall, the pool has a WA expected loss of 4.66%, which is lower
than recently analyzed comparable small balance transactions.
Contributing factors to the low expected loss include pool
diversity, low leverage, and relatively strong markets.
Furthermore, the pool is relatively diverse based on loan size,
with an average balance of $775,329, a concentration profile
equivalent to that of a pool with 132 equal-size loans, and a
top-10 loan concentration of 18.0%. Increased pool diversity helps
insulate the higher-rated classes from event risk. Additionally,
the loans are mostly secured by traditional property types (i.e.,
retail, multifamily, office, and industrial) with only 7.0%
exposure to higher-volatility property types, such as hotels,
self-storage, or MHCs. There are also two individual marina
properties, amounting to 1.7% of the pool, that were part of a
portfolio that was analyzed as industrial. Also, the pool has a low
cut-off WA LTV of 39.1% based on the appraisal and BOVs dated
between May 2020 and March 2021. One hundred ninety-six loans in
the pool (representing 48.1% of the pool balance) fully amortize
over their respective remaining loan terms between eight and 213
months, reducing refinance risk. Finally, on average, the loans
have a term of 17.3 years with 10.9 years of seasoning. Seasoned
loans typically have a lower default rate because of market value
appreciation.

The pool contains a significant exposure to retail (31.3% of the
pool) and a smaller exposure to hospitality (3.4% of the pool),
which are two of the higher-volatility asset types. Combined, they
represent over one third of the pool balance. Retail, which has
struggled because of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic,
comprises the largest asset type in the transaction. DBRS
Morningstar applied a 20.0% reduction to the NCF for retail
properties and a 40.0% reduction for hospitality assets in the
pool, which is above the average NCF reduction applied for
comparable property types in CMBS analyzed deals. Multifamily
comprises the second-largest property type concentration in the
pool (19.3%); based on DBRS Morningstar's research, multifamily
properties securitized in conduit transactions have had lower
default rates than most other property types. DBRS Morningstar did
not perform site inspections on properties within its sample for
this transaction. Instead, DBRS Morningstar relied upon analysis of
third-party reports and online searches to determine property
quality assessments. Of the 39 loans DBRS Morningstar sampled,
10.7% were Average + quality, 58.6% were Average quality, and 30.7%
were Average –, Below Average, or Poor quality. DBRS Morningstar
applied a 20.0% reduction to the NCF for retail properties and a
40.0% reduction for hospitality assets in the pool, which is above
the average NCF reduction applied for comparable property types in
CMBS analyzed deals. Multifamily comprises the second-largest
property type concentration in the pool (19.3%); based on DBRS
Morningstar's research, multifamily properties securitized in
conduit transactions have had lower default rates than most other
property types.

DBRS Morningstar performed site inspections on 23 loans that were
initially securitized as part of the SCMT 2018-SBC7 transaction.
DBRS Morningstar applied the property quality assessments from
those site inspections, which ranged from Average + to Poor, with
the majority having Average property quality. DBRS Morningstar
assumed unsampled loans were Average – quality, which has a
slightly increased POD level. This is more conservative than the
assessments from sampled or previously sampled loans and is
consistent with other small balance commercial transactions.
Limited property-level information was available for DBRS
Morningstar to review. Asset summary reports, property condition
reports (PCRs), Phase I/II environmental site assessment (ESA)
reports, appraisals, and historical financial cash flows were
generally not available for review in conjunction with this
securitization. DBRS Morningstar received a recent BOV or appraised
value for all loans and the appraised value from origination for
most loans. To calculate the LTV for the model, DBRS Morningstar
relied on the BOV figure for assets in urban markets with a DBRS
Morningstar Market Rank of 6, 7, or 8, which are more likely to
experience value appreciation since loan origination. For all other
loans, DBRS Morningstar assumed a value based on the lower of the
original appraisal or BOV. For loans without an original appraised
value, DBRS Morningstar assumed an original LTV of 65%. This hybrid
assumption produced a WA LTV of 47.6% versus an LTV of 39.1% based
solely on the most recent BOV or appraisal and the current loan
amount.

No ESA reports were provided; however, 58 properties (18.5% of the
pool) had desktop environmental assessments, including all
industrial properties and several other office or retail
properties. None of these reports reflected subject site risks.
Because of the lack of traditional PCRs and property condition
assessments typically performed on CMBS loans, DBRS Morningstar
applied a LGD penalty to mitigate any potential future risk. DBRS
Morningstar was able to perform a loan-level cash flow analysis on
only six loans in the DBRS Morningstar sample. Based on cash flow
analysis from comparable small balance commercial loan pools, DBRS
Morningstar applied an average 20.4% blended reduction to the
BOV-estimated NCF for this transaction. This cash flow reduction is
well above the median historical reduction of 8.0% and provides
meaningful stress to the default levels.

DBRS Morningstar received limited borrower information, net worth
or liquidity information, and credit history. DBRS Morningstar
generally initially assumed loans had Weak sponsor strength scores,
which increases the stress on the default rate. The initial
assumption of Weak reflects the generally less sophisticated nature
of small balance borrowers and assessments from past small balance
transactions. Furthermore, DBRS Morningstar received a 24-month pay
history on each loan as of March 31, 2021. If any loan had more
than two late pays within this period or two consecutive late pays,
DBRS Morningstar applied an additional stress to the default rate.
This occurred for 33 loans, representing 11.0% of the pool balance.
Additionally, DBRS Morningstar identified 153 loans, or 59.8% of
the pool, as non-full-recourse loans, which, for small balance
commercial transactions, DBRS Morningstar views as credit negative.
DBRS Morningstar assumed these loans had elevated default levels to
mitigate this risk. Finally, DBRS Morningstar received a borrower
FICO score as of March 22, 2021, for 269 of the 304 loans, with an
average FICO score of 743. While the CMBS Methodology does not
contemplate FICO scores, the RMBS Methodology does and would
characterize a FICO score of 743 as near-prime, where prime is
considered greater than 750. Borrowers with a FICO score of 743
could generally be described as potentially having had previous
credit events (foreclosure, bankruptcy, etc.) but, if they did, it
is likely that these credit events were cleared about two to five
years ago.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



SEQUOIA MORTGAGE 2021-4: Fitch Assigns BB- Rating on B-4 Certs
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned ratings to the residential
mortgage-backed certificates issued by Sequoia Mortgage Trust
2021-4 (SEMT 2021-4).

DEBT             RATING             PRIOR
----            ------              -----
SEMT 2021-4

A-1       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-10      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-11      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-12      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-13      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-14      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-15      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-16      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-17      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-18      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-19      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-2       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-20      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-21      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-22      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-23      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-24      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-25      LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-3       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-4       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-5       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-6       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-7       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-8       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-9       LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO1     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO10    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO11    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO12    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO13    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO14    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO15    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO16    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO17    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO18    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO19    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO2     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO20    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO21    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO22    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO23    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO24    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO25    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO26    LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO3     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO4     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO5     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO6     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO7     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO8     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
A-IO9     LT AAAsf   New Rating   AAA(EXP)sf
B-1       LT AA-sf   New Rating   AA-(EXP)sf
B-2       LT A-sf    New Rating   A-(EXP)sf
B-3       LT BBB-sf  New Rating   BBB-(EXP)sf
B-4       LT BB-sf   New Rating   BB-(EXP)sf
B-5       LT NRsf    New Rating   NR(EXP)sf

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

Fitch rates the residential mortgage-backed certificates issued by
SEMT 2021-4 as indicated above. The certificates are supported by
812 loans with a total balance of approximately $723.27 million as
of the cutoff date. The pool consists of prime fixed-rate mortgages
acquired by Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. from various
mortgage originators. Distributions of principal and interest (P&I)
and loss allocations are based on a senior-subordinate,
shifting-interest structure.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High-Quality Mortgage Pool (Positive): The collateral consists of
812 full documentation loans, totaling $723.27 million and seasoned
approximately three months in aggregate. The borrowers have a
strong credit profile (777 model FICO, 29.5% debt-to-income ratio
[DTI]) and moderate leverage (75.6% sustainable loan-to-value ratio
[sLTV]). Of the pool, 96.3% consist of loans for primary
residences, while 3.7% are for second homes. Additionally, 92.6% of
the loans were originated through a retail channel, and 100% are
designated as a qualified mortgage (QM) loan.

Shifting-Interest Structure (Negative): The mortgage cash flow and
loss allocation are based on a senior-subordinate,
shifting-interest structure, whereby the subordinate classes
receive only scheduled principal and are locked out from receiving
unscheduled principal or prepayments for five years. The lockout
feature helps maintain subordination for a longer period should
losses occur later in the life of the deal. The applicable credit
support percentage feature redirects subordinate principal to
classes of higher seniority if specified credit enhancement (CE)
levels are not maintained.

Interest Reduction Risk (Negative): The transaction incorporates a
structural feature most commonly used by Redwood's program for
loans more than 120 days delinquent (a stop-advance loan). Unpaid
interest on stop-advance loans reduces the amount of interest that
is contractually due to bondholders in reverse-sequential order.
While this feature helps limit cash flow leakage to subordinate
bonds, it can result in interest reductions to rated bonds in
high-stress scenarios.

120-Day Stop Advance (Mixed): The deal is structured to four months
of servicer advances for delinquent P&I. The limited advancing
reduces loss severities as a lower amount is repaid to the servicer
when a loan liquidates.

CE Floor (Positive): To mitigate tail risk, which arises as the
pool seasons and fewer loans are outstanding, a subordination floor
of 0.75% of the original balance will be maintained for the
certificates.

Updated Economic Risk Factor (Positive): Consistent with the
"Additional Scenario Analysis" section of Fitch's "U.S. RMBS
Coronavirus-Related Analytical Assumptions" criteria, Fitch will
consider applying additional scenario analysis based on stressed
assumptions as described in the section to remain consistent with
significant revisions to its macroeconomic baseline scenario or if
actual performance data indicate the current assumptions require
reconsideration. In response to revisions made to Fitch's
macroeconomic baseline scenario, observed actual performance data,
and the unexpected development in the health crisis arising from
the advancement and availability of coronavirus vaccines, Fitch
reconsidered the application of the coronavirus-related ERF floors
of 2.0 and used ERF floors of 1.5 and 1.0 for the 'BBsf' and 'Bsf'
rating stresses, respectively.

Fitch's March 2021 "Global Economic Outlook" and related base-line
economic scenario forecasts have been revised to a 6.2% U.S. GDP
growth for 2021 and 3.3% for 2022 following the negative 3.5% GDP
rate in 2020. Additionally, Fitch's U.S. unemployment forecasts for
2021 and 2022 are 5.8% and 4.7%, respectively, down from 8.1% in
2020. These revised forecasts support Fitch reverting to the 1.5
and 1.0 ERF floors described in its "U.S. RMBS Loan Loss Model
Criteria."

ESG Relevance Score (Positive): The transaction has an ESG
Relevance Score of '4[+]' for Exposure to Governance as a result of
the strong counterparties and well controlled operational
considerations and is relevant to the ratings in conjunction with
other factors.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Fitch incorporates a sensitivity analysis to demonstrate how the
ratings would react to steeper market value declines (MVDs) than
assumed at the MSA level. Sensitivity analyses was conducted at the
state and national levels to assess the effect of higher MVDs for
the subject pool as well as lower MVDs, illustrated by a gain in
home prices.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to a negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- This defined negative rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates
    how the ratings would react to steeper MVDs at the national
    level. The analysis assumes MVDs of 10.0%, 20.0% and 30.0% in
    addition to the model-projected 41.2% at 'AAA'. The analysis
    indicates that there is some potential rating migration with
    higher MVDs for all rated classes, compared with the model
    projection. Specifically, a 10% additional decline in home
    prices would lower all rated classes by one full category.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to a positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- This defined positive rating sensitivity analysis demonstrates
    how the ratings would react to positive home price growth of
    10% with no assumed overvaluation. Excluding the senior class,
    which is already rated 'AAAsf', the analysis indicates there
    is potential positive rating migration for all of the rated
    classes. Specifically, a 10% gain in home prices would result
    in a full category upgrade for the rated class excluding those
    being assigned ratings of 'AAAsf'.

This section provides insight into the model-implied sensitivities
the transaction faces when one assumption is modified, while
holding others equal. The modeling process uses the modification of
these variables to reflect asset performance in up- and down
environments. The results should only be considered as one
potential outcome, as the transaction is exposed to multiple
dynamic risk factors. It should not be used as an indicator of
possible future performance.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Structured Finance
transactions have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as
the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of seven notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of seven notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAAsf' to 'Dsf'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings
are based on historical performance.

CRITERIA VARIATION

The analysis includes one variation to Fitch's "U.S. RMBS Rating
Criteria". Fitch expects to conduct an originator review every
12-18 months for any underlying originator that contributed 15% or
more to a transaction. The originator review for Prime Lending
(19.3%) has expired. The loans in the pool are of very high
quality, a third-party due diligence review was conducted on
approximately 71% of the loans in the pool (with 100% A and B
grades), and the concentration is just slightly above the
concentration noted in Fitch's criteria. Additionally, Fitch has
reviewed Redwood as an above-average aggregator. Loans that do not
have an originator assessment are treated as the aggregator in
Fitch's analysis and, therefore, no adjustment was made. This
variation did not result in a rating impact.

USE OF THIRD PARTY DUE DILIGENCE PURSUANT TO SEC RULE 17G -10

Fitch was provided with Form ABS Due Diligence-15E (Form 15E) as
prepared by Clayton and EdgeMac. The third-party due diligence
described in Form 15E focused on credit, compliance and property
valuations. Fitch considered this information in its analysis and,
as a result, Fitch made the following adjustment(s) to its
analysis: a 5% reduction to the loan's probability of default. This
adjustment(s) resulted in a less than 25bps reduction to the
'AAAsf' expected loss.

DATA ADEQUACY

Fitch relied in its analysis on an independent third-party due
diligence review performed on about 70% of the pool. The
third-party due diligence was consistent with Fitch's "U.S. RMBS
Rating Criteria." Clayton and EdgeMac, were engaged to perform the
review. Loans reviewed under this engagement were given compliance,
credit and valuation grades and assigned initial grades for each
subcategory. Minimal exceptions and waivers were noted in the due
diligence reports. Refer to the Third-Party Due Diligence section
of the presale report for further details.

Fitch also utilized data files that were made available by the
issuer on its SEC Rule 17g-5-designated website. Fitch received
loan-level information based on the American Securitization Forum's
(ASF) data layout format, and the data are considered
comprehensive. The ASF data tape layout was established with input
from various industry participants, including rating agencies,
issuers, originators, investors and others, to produce an industry
standard for the pool-level data in support of the U.S. RMBS
securitization market. The data contained in the ASF layout data
tape were reviewed by the due diligence companies, and no material
discrepancies were noted.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2021-4 has an ESG Relevance Score of '4[+]'
for Exposure to Governance as a result of the strong counterparties
and well controlled operational considerations. This has a positive
impact on the credit profile and is relevant to the ratings in
conjunction with other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


SFO COMMERCIAL 2021-555: DBRS Finalizes BB Rating on Class F Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following
classes of notes issued by SFO Commercial Mortgage Trust 2021-555.

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (sf)
-- Class C at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class D at A (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (sf)
-- Class HRR at BB (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

SFO 2021-555 is a single-asset/single-borrower transaction
collateralized by the borrower's fee-simple interest in the 555
California Street Campus (the Campus), a 1.8 million-sf Class A
office complex in the North Financial District of San Francisco.
J.P. Morgan will fund the total debt of $1.2 billion for the
refinancing of the Campus. The IO floating-rate $1.2 billion loan
has an initial term of two years with five one-year extension
options. The total capitalization of $2.0 billion includes $850.0
million of sponsor equity, which will be used to refinance $532.7
million of existing debt, return $616.0 million of sponsor equity,
fund $19.8 million of outstanding TI/LC reserves and $12.5 million
of free rent, fund capital improvement reserves for Bank of America
for $6.9 million, and pay $12.0 million of closing costs. The
transaction has a slightly elevated DBRS Morningstar Issuance LTV
of 90.21%, based on the trust debt. The loan-to-value ratio (LTV)
based on the appraised value of $2.1 billion is 58.5%.

The sponsor is a 70/30 joint venture between Vornado Realty L.P.
and Donald J. Trump. The loan is 100% controlled by Vornado Realty
Trust, a publicly traded real estate investment trust and a member
of the S&P 500 Index. Vornado's portfolio is concentrated in New
York City, Chicago, and San Francisco. Vornado acquired the Campus
in 2007 and has invested $164.8 million ($90.63 per square foot
(psf)) into the Campus since 2016.

DBRS Morningstar has a positive view on the near- to midterm
sustainability of the Campus' net cash flow (NCF), based on its
location, tenancy, and historical performance. The Campus is in the
North Financial District in the San Francisco central business
district (CBD) market. According to the Q4 2020 appraisal
information, the North Financial District has 26.3 million sf of
inventory with an overall occupancy rate of 82.4% and a direct
weighted-average (WA) Class A rent of $85.96 psf, compared with the
South Financial District's total inventory of 27.9 million sf,
occupancy rate of 87.7%, and direct WA Class A rent of $85.44 psf.
The North Financial District has no office space under construction
at this time.

Although the North Financial District has a high overall vacancy
rate, the Campus significantly outperforms the submarket. As of the
February 1, 2021, rent roll, the Campus was 92.7% occupied,
including the vacant property, 345 Montgomery, which has completed
its renovation. The Campus has a WA occupancy rate of 95.3% since
2010 and benefits from a granular rent roll with only one tenant,
Bank of America at 18.1% of net rentable area (NRA), accounting for
more than 10.0% of NRA. Additionally, Bank of America is the only
investment-grade-rated tenant receiving any DBRS Morningstar Long
Term Credit Tenant (LTCT) treatment. The second-largest tenant is
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which accounts for 8.4% of NRA. The rent roll
is well diversified, consisting of 41 unique tenants with 19
investment-grade tenants, accounting for 34.4% of NRA. Such
diversification is credit positive as the cash flow will be less
susceptible to revenue swings, making it more resilient during
economic downturns such as during the Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) pandemic.

Although the ongoing pandemic continues to pose challenges and
risks to virtually all major commercial real estate property types,
the property has shown strong performance during these
unprecedented times with approximately 2.1% of the tenants based on
total NRA requesting rent relief and a current vacancy rate of
7.3%. The Campus has demonstrated very strong performance with an
11-year historical occupancy rate of 95.3%, greater than the Reis
submarket's 91.7%. Tenants plan to bring employees back to the
office around May or June for those who want to come into the
office. Currently, the Campus is averaging 200 people per day at
555 California and approximately 15 per day at 315 Montgomery;
pre-pandemic, 555 California averaged approximately 4,500-5,200
people per day.

The Campus has great exposure with a full block frontage on
California Street, a primary two-way, four-lane major arterial that
runs east to west in downtown San Francisco with the San Francisco
Streetcar line, along with full frontage on Pine Street, Montgomery
Street, and Kearny Street. Additionally, the location affords
excellent access to public transportation, with four BART subway
lines that stop twice in the Financial District and transport
commuters to and from San Francisco to the East Bay.

Although 315 Montgomery was built in 1921 and 555 California Street
and 345 Montgomery were built in 1971, the Campus has received
approximately $164.8 million or $90.63 psf of capital improvements.
555 California received $64.3 million ($42.72 psf) in capital
improvements for concourse renovation and retail enhancements, the
opening of the Vault restaurant, roof replacement, new lobby
furnishings, HVAC upgrades, and modernizations to the restrooms.
315 Montgomery received $39.7 million ($168.74 psf), and 345
Montgomery received $60.8 million ($779.56 psf) to complete a full
renovation and restoration transforming the building into a new
creative office building with a five-story atrium. Additionally,
555 California has 30,000-sf office plates with 700,000 sf of
protected, unobstructed views, twice as much as its direct
competitors.

The highly granular rent roll is well diversified, consisting of 41
unique tenants with 19 investment-grade tenants and AM Law rated
tenants, accounting for 68.7% of NRA. Bank of America, at 18.1% of
NRA, is the only tenant at the property accounting for more than
10.0% of NRA. Bank of America recently executed a lease extension
commencing in October 2025 for 10 years. Additionally, only 1.4% of
NRA (25,701 sf) of leases are subleased for a WA rent of $90.12 psf
to FTV Management Company (962 sf), KKR Credit Advisors (4,673 sf),
and Lending Home Corporation (20,066 sf), greater than the in-place
WA rent of $79.85 psf. Five tenants, accounting for 2.1% of NRA
(37,544 sf), have requested rent relief between May 2020 and July
2020 and are scheduled to repay in 2021.

Since 2019, the Campus has renewed or signed approximately 512,825
sf with a WA rent psf of $101.56 equal to $27.0 million of total
net. Most recently, the Goldman Sachs Group (Goldman Sachs)
executed a five-year lease renewal for 90,000 sf at 555 California,
increasing its rent to $110 psf from a base rent of $59-$75 psf.
Additionally, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. recently executed
a four-year renewal for 50,515 sf at a base rent of $110 psf.

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has created an element of
uncertainty around future demand for office space, even in gateway
markets that have historically been highly liquid. While some
tenant spaces are not completely occupied as employees have
continued to work from home during the pandemic, all tenants are
now open and operating. Approximately 2.1% of the tenants based on
total NRA have requested rent relief, most of which are retail
tenants. Between December 2020 and March 2021, collections equated
to approximately 98.0% with deferrals and abatements combined
equating to less than 1% of total revenue. According to management,
daily headcount at the property is still much lower than average.

The Campus has three years during the loan term with tenant
rollover exceeding 10% of NRA: 2023, 2025, and 2026 with 10.4%,
22.6%, and 18.8% rollover, respectively. Leases representing
approximately 64.3% of the NRA at the property will roll over
through 2028. The loan's cash management provisions are based on a
simple 5.5% debt yield trigger in order to sweep excess cash flow
or collect reserves for re-tenanting expenses. Furthermore, the
tenant rollover reserve is capped at $3,637,800 in aggregate, and
the replacement reserve is capped at $1,000,000 in the aggregate.
Also, the borrower is allowed to replace any actual cash reserves
with a letter of credit or guaranty from an affiliate as further
detailed in the loan document.

345 California is currently 100% vacant after undergoing a $60.8
million renovation. The space is not easily subdivided and is best
suited for a single tenant. Management indicates there are no
tenant letters of intents (LOI) issued. However, during the site
inspection on-site management stated there has been interest by
prospective tenants.

The aggregate probable maximum loss (PML) for 555 California and
345 Montgomery according to the seismic consultant is 14%, and the
315 California building PML is 19% due to its much older
construction. The borrower carries an all-risk blanket insurance
policy that includes earthquake coverage.

The loan is IO for the entire term. The lack of principal
amortization during the loan term can increase the refinance risk
at maturity. The loan leverage is considered moderate at a 58.5%
LTV based upon the market appraised value and a DBRS Morningstar
Issuance LTV of 90.21%. Furthermore there is no additional debt
allowed other than trade payables capped at 4% of the initial loan
amount.

Additionally, the sponsor is cashing out approximately $616.0
million of equity, equal to 30.1% of the cost basis. Although the
sponsor is extracting an exceptional amount of capital out of the
assets, it has also invested substantially in the properties since
2016, spending an estimated $164.8 million on the campus to improve
it.

Three of the top five tenants, Bank of America, Kirkland & Ellis
LLP, and UBS Financial Services (collectively 32.0% of NRA and
33.1% of UW base rent) have the options to terminate their leases.
DBRS Morningstar did not give LTCT credit for the Bank of America
spaces on floors 11 and 44 that carry the early termination
options. All of the tenants have spent considerable amounts of
their own capital to improve their spaces, and Bank of America is
currently undertaking a full renovation of its space.

There is no recourse carve-out guarantor for the loan, and
certificate holders must look solely to the net revenues from the
operation of the property and any net proceeds from the refinancing
or sale of the property for payment of amounts due on the loan. The
borrower "Bad Boy"guarantees and consequent access to a guarantor
help mitigate the risk and increased loss severity of bankruptcy,
additional encumbrances, unapproved transfers, fraud,
misappropriation of rents, physical waste, and other potential bad
acts of the borrower or its sponsor. The borrower is a recycled
special purpose entity (SPE) indirectly owned and controlled by a
joint venture between Vornado Realty L.P. (VRLP or Vornado) (70.0%
of the equity interest) and Donald J. Trump or one or more trusts
for such individual or any affiliate (30.0% of the equity
interest).

Transfer of the indirect beneficial interests in the borrower owned
by Trump may occur, provided that Vornado and/or eligible qualified
owners will still control the borrower and directly or indirectly
own at least 20% of the direct or indirect beneficial interests in
borrower in the aggregate. If any transfer results in any person
(together with its affiliates and family members) acquiring more
than 49% of the direct or indirect equity interest in borrower, an
additional insolvency opinion must be delivered that in the
lender's (servicer's) reasonable judgment satisfies the
then-current rating agency criteria. The transfer must meet all
legal requirements including OFAC, the Patriot Act, and ERISA. Any
person that acquires, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the
equity interests in borrower must be an institutional investor. The
eligible qualified owner and institutional investor definitions
generally require real estate assets owned to be in excess of $2
billion and net worth in excess of $1 billion. The borrower may not
permit any transfer of any Vornado direct or indirect interest in
the borrower to Trump without the express written consent of the
lender, which can granted or withheld in the lender's sole and
absolute discretion, and any such transfer of any direct or
indirect interest in the Borrower held by Vornado to Trump will not
be considered a permitted transfer.

The underlying mortgage loan for the transaction will pay floating
rate, which presents potential benchmark transition risk as the
deadline approaches for the elimination of Libor. The transaction
documents provide for the transition to an alternative benchmark
rate, which is primarily contemplated to be either Term Secured
Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) or Compounded SOFR plus the
applicable Alternative Rate Spread Adjustment. Term SOFR does not
currently exist and there is no assurance it will fully develop or
be widely adopted. Compounded SOFR, which is expected to be a
backward-looking rate generally calculated using actual rates
during the applicable interest accrual period, is considered by
some servicers to be less practical to implement. The servicer for
the transaction will have sole discretion over various aspects of a
benchmark transition. Any uncertainty or delay in transitioning to
an alternative to Libor could lead to unforeseen issues for both
the mortgage loan borrower and certificate holders. Additionally,
in order to extend the loan, the borrower must also obtain a
replacement interest rate cap agreement. If a replacement agreement
is not commercially available, the borrower can propose an
alternative hedging instrument that would provide substantially
equivalent protection from increases in the interest rate. However,
the servicer can reject any proposal and impose its own hedging
solution, if any.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



SFO COMMERCIAL 2021-555: DBRS Gives Prov. BB Rating on F Certs
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2021-555 to
be issued by SFO Commercial Mortgage Trust 2021-555.

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (sf)
-- Class C at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class D at A (low) (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (sf)
-- Class HRR at BB (low) (sf)

All trends are Stable.

SFO 2021-555 is a single-asset/single-borrower transaction
collateralized by the borrower's fee-simple interest in the 555
California Street Campus (the Campus), a 1.8 million-sf Class A
office complex in the North Financial District of San Francisco.
J.P. Morgan will fund the total debt of $1.2 billion for the
refinancing of the Campus. The IO floating-rate $1.2 billion loan
has an initial term of two years with five one-year extension
options. The total capitalization of $2.0 billion includes $850.0
million of sponsor equity, which will be used to refinance $532.7
million of existing debt, return $616.0 million of sponsor equity,
fund $19.8 million of outstanding TI/LC reserves and $12.5 million
of free rent, fund capital improvement reserves for Bank of America
for $6.9 million, and pay $12.0 million of closing costs. The
transaction has a slightly elevated DBRS Morningstar Issuance LTV
of 90.21%, based on the trust debt. The loan-to-value ratio (LTV)
based on the appraised value of $2.1 billion is 58.5%.

The sponsor is a 70/30 joint venture between Vornado Realty L.P.
and Donald J. Trump. The loan is 100% controlled by Vornado Realty
Trust, a publicly traded real estate investment trust and a member
of the S&P 500 Index. Vornado's portfolio is concentrated in New
York City, Chicago, and San Francisco. Vornado acquired the Campus
in 2007 and has invested $164.8 million ($90.63 per square foot
(psf)) into the Campus since 2016.

DBRS Morningstar has a positive view on the near- to midterm
sustainability of the Campus' net cash flow (NCF), based on its
location, tenancy, and historical performance. The Campus is in the
North Financial District in the San Francisco central business
district (CBD) market. According to the Q4 2020 appraisal
information, the North Financial District has 26.3 million sf of
inventory with an overall occupancy rate of 82.4% and a direct
weighted-average (WA) Class A rent of $85.96 psf, compared with the
South Financial District's total inventory of 27.9 million sf,
occupancy rate of 87.7%, and direct WA Class A rent of $85.44 psf.
The North Financial District has no office space under construction
at this time.

Although the North Financial District has a high overall vacancy
rate, the Campus significantly outperforms the submarket. As of the
February 1, 2021, rent roll, the Campus was 92.7% occupied,
including the vacant property, 345 Montgomery, which has completed
its renovation. The Campus has a WA occupancy rate of 95.3% since
2010 and benefits from a granular rent roll with only one tenant,
Bank of America at 18.1% of net rentable area (NRA), accounting for
more than 10.0% of NRA. Additionally, Bank of America is the only
investment-grade-rated tenant receiving any DBRS Morningstar Long
Term Credit Tenant (LTCT) treatment. The second-largest tenant is
Kirkland & Ellis LLP, which accounts for 8.4% of NRA. The rent roll
is well diversified, consisting of 41 unique tenants with 19
investment-grade tenants, accounting for 34.4% of NRA. Such
diversification is credit positive as the cash flow will be less
susceptible to revenue swings, making it more resilient during
economic downturns such as during the Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) pandemic.

Although the ongoing pandemic continues to pose challenges and
risks to virtually all major commercial real estate property types,
the property has shown strong performance during these
unprecedented times with approximately 2.1% of the tenants based on
total NRA requesting rent relief and a current vacancy rate of
7.3%. The Campus has demonstrated very strong performance with an
11-year historical occupancy rate of 95.3%, greater than the Reis
submarket's 91.7%. Tenants plan to bring employees back to the
office around May or June for those who want to come into the
office. Currently, the Campus is averaging 200 people per day at
555 California and approximately 15 per day at 315 Montgomery;
pre-pandemic, 555 California averaged approximately 4,500-5,200
people per day.

The Campus has great exposure with a full block frontage on
California Street, a primary two-way, four-lane major arterial that
runs east to west in downtown San Francisco with the San Francisco
Streetcar line, along with full frontage on Pine Street, Montgomery
Street, and Kearny Street. Additionally, the location affords
excellent access to public transportation, with four BART subway
lines that stop twice in the Financial District and transport
commuters to and from San Francisco to the East Bay.

Although 315 Montgomery was built in 1921 and 555 California Street
and 345 Montgomery were built in 1971, the Campus has received
approximately $164.8 million or $90.63 psf of capital improvements.
555 California received $64.3 million ($42.72 psf) in capital
improvements for concourse renovation and retail enhancements, the
opening of the Vault restaurant, roof replacement, new lobby
furnishings, HVAC upgrades, and modernizations to the restrooms.
315 Montgomery received $39.7 million ($168.74 psf), and 345
Montgomery received $60.8 million ($779.56 psf) to complete a full
renovation and restoration transforming the building into a new
creative office building with a five-story atrium. Additionally,
555 California has 30,000-sf office plates with 700,000 sf of
protected, unobstructed views, twice as much as its direct
competitors.

The highly granular rent roll is well diversified, consisting of 41
unique tenants with 19 investment-grade tenants and AM Law rated
tenants, accounting for 68.7% of NRA. Bank of America, at 18.1% of
NRA, is the only tenant at the property accounting for more than
10.0% of NRA. Bank of America recently executed a lease extension
commencing in October 2025 for 10 years. Additionally, only 1.4% of
NRA (25,701 sf) of leases are subleased for a WA rent of $90.12 psf
to FTV Management Company (962 sf), KKR Credit Advisors (4,673 sf),
and LendingHome Corporation (20,066 sf), greater than the in-place
WA rent of $79.85 psf. Five tenants, accounting for 2.1% of NRA
(37,544 sf), have requested rent relief between May 2020 and July
2020 and are scheduled to repay in 2021.

Since 2019, the Campus has renewed or signed approximately 512,825
sf with a WA rent psf of $101.56 equal to $27.0 million of total
net. Most recently, the Goldman Sachs Group (Goldman Sachs)
executed a five-year lease renewal for 90,000 sf at 555 California,
increasing its rent to $110 psf from a base rent of $59-$75 psf.
Additionally, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. recently executed
a four-year renewal for 50,515 sf at a base rent of $110 psf.

The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has created an element of
uncertainty around future demand for office space, even in gateway
markets that have historically been highly liquid. While some
tenant spaces are not completely occupied as employees have
continued to work from home during the pandemic, all tenants are
now open and operating. Approximately 2.1% of the tenants based on
total NRA have requested rent relief, most of which are retail
tenants. Between December 2020 and March 2021, collections equated
to approximately 98.0% with deferrals and abatements combined
equating to less than 1% of total revenue. According to management,
daily headcount at the property is still much lower than average.

The Campus has three years during the loan term with tenant
rollover exceeding 10% of NRA: 2023, 2025, and 2026 with 10.4%,
22.6%, and 18.8% rollover, respectively. Leases representing
approximately 64.3% of the NRA at the property will roll over
through 2028. The loan's cash management provisions are based on a
simple 5.5% debt yield trigger in order to sweep excess cash flow
or collect reserves for re-tenanting expenses. Furthermore, the
tenant rollover reserve is capped at $3,637,800 in aggregate, and
the replacement reserve is capped at $1,000,000 in the aggregate.
Also, the borrower is allowed to replace any actual cash reserves
with a letter of credit or guaranty from an affiliate as further
detailed in the loan document.

345 California is currently 100% vacant after undergoing a $60.8
million renovation. The space is not easily subdivided and is best
suited for a single tenant. Management indicates there are no
tenant letters of intents (LOI) issued. However, during the site
inspection on-site management stated there has been interest by
prospective tenants.

The aggregate probable maximum loss (PML) for 555 California and
345 Montgomery according to the seismic consultant is 14%, and the
315 California building PML is 19% due to its much older
construction. The borrower carries an all-risk blanket insurance
policy that includes earthquake coverage.

The loan is IO for the entire term. The lack of principal
amortization during the loan term can increase the refinance risk
at maturity. The loan leverage is considered moderate at a 58.5%
LTV based upon the market appraised value and a DBRS Morningstar
Issuance LTV of 90.21%. Furthermore there is no additional debt
allowed other than trade payables capped at 4% of the initial loan
amount.

Additionally, the sponsor is cashing out approximately $616.0
million of equity, equal to 30.1% of the cost basis. Although the
sponsor is extracting an exceptional amount of capital out of the
assets, it has also invested substantially in the properties since
2016, spending an estimated $164.8 million on the campus to improve
it.

Three of the top five tenants, Bank of America, Kirkland & Ellis
LLP, and UBS Financial Services (collectively 32.0% of NRA and
33.1% of UW base rent) have the options to terminate their leases.
DBRS Morningstar did not give LTCT credit for the Bank of America
spaces on floors 11 and 44 that carry the early termination
options. All of the tenants have spent considerable amounts of
their own capital to improve their spaces, and Bank of America is
currently undertaking a full renovation of its space.

There is no recourse carve-out guarantor for the loan, and
certificateholders must look solely to the net revenues from the
operation of the property and any net proceeds from the refinancing
or sale of the property for payment of amounts due on the loan. The
borrower "Bad Boy"” guarantees and consequent access to a
guarantor help mitigate the risk and increased loss severity of
bankruptcy, additional encumbrances, unapproved transfers, fraud,
misappropriation of rents, physical waste, and other potential bad
acts of the borrower or its sponsor. The borrower is a recycled
special purpose entity (SPE) indirectly owned and controlled by a
joint venture between Vornado Realty L.P. (VRLP or Vornado) (70.0%
of the equity interest) and Donald J. Trump or one or more trusts
for such individual or any affiliate (30.0% of the equity
interest).

Transfer of the indirect beneficial interests in the borrower owned
by Trump may occur, provided that Vornado and/or eligible qualified
owners will still control the borrower and directly or indirectly
own at least 20% of the direct or indirect beneficial interests in
borrower in the aggregate. If any transfer results in any person
(together with its affiliates and family members) acquiring more
than 49% of the direct or indirect equity interest in borrower, an
additional insolvency opinion must be delivered that in the
lender's (servicer's) reasonable judgment satisfies the
then-current rating agency criteria. The transfer must meet all
legal requirements including OFAC, the Patriot Act, and ERISA. Any
person that acquires, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the
equity interests in borrower must be an institutional investor. The
eligible qualified owner and institutional investor definitions
generally require real estate assets owned to be in excess of $2
billion and net worth in excess of $1 billion. The borrower may not
permit any transfer of any Vornado direct or indirect interest in
the borrower to Trump without the express written consent of the
lender, which can granted or withheld in the lender's sole and
absolute discretion, and any such transfer of any direct or
indirect interest in the Borrower held by Vornado to Trump will not
be considered a permitted transfer.

The underlying mortgage loan for the transaction will pay floating
rate, which presents potential benchmark transition risk as the
deadline approaches for the elimination of Libor. The transaction
documents provide for the transition to an alternative benchmark
rate, which is primarily contemplated to be either Term Secured
Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) or Compounded SOFR plus the
applicable Alternative Rate Spread Adjustment. Term SOFR does not
currently exist and there is no assurance it will fully develop or
be widely adopted. Compounded SOFR, which is expected to be a
backward-looking rate generally calculated using actual rates
during the applicable interest accrual period, is considered by
some servicers to be less practical to implement. The servicer for
the transaction will have sole discretion over various aspects of a
benchmark transition. Any uncertainty or delay in transitioning to
an alternative to Libor could lead to unforeseen issues for both
the mortgage loan borrower and certificate holders. Additionally,
in order to extend the loan, the borrower must also obtain a
replacement interest rate cap agreement. If a replacement agreement
is not commercially available, the borrower can propose an
alternative hedging instrument that would provide substantially
equivalent protection from increases in the interest rate. However,
the servicer can reject any proposal and impose its own hedging
solution, if any.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



STARWOOD MORTGAGE 2021-2: S&P Assigns B (sf) Rating on B-2 Certs
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to Starwood Mortgage
Residential Trust 2021-2's mortgage pass-through certificates.

The certificate issuance is an RMBS transaction backed by an
aggregate pool comprised of 904 newly originated and seasoned
fixed- and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans, (some with
interest-only features) secured by first liens on single-family
residences, planned-unit developments, condominiums,
two-four-family, mixed-use and five- to 10-unit residential
properties. All of the loans are either non-QM or are exempt from
the qualified mortgage/ability-to-repay rules.

The ratings reflect:

-- The pool's collateral composition;

-- The credit enhancement provided for this transaction;

-- The transaction's associated structural mechanics;

-- The representation and warranty (R&W) framework for this
transaction;

-- The mortgage aggregator and mortgage originators;

-- The geographic concentration; and

-- The impact the COVID-19 pandemic will likely have on the
performance of the mortgage borrowers in the pool and liquidity
available in the transaction.

  Ratings Assigned

  Starwood Mortgage Residential Trust 2021-2(i)

  Class A-1, $172,917,000: AAA (sf)
  Class A-2, $16,251,000: AA (sf)
  Class A-3, $25,772,000: A (sf)
  Class M-1, $16,378,000: BBB (sf)
  Class B-1, $10,537,000: BB (sf)
  Class B-2, $7,110,000: B (sf)
  Class B-3, $4,952,040: NR
  Class A-IO-S(ii), Notional(iii): NR
  Class XS(ii),Notional(iii): NR
  Class A-R, N/A: NR

(i)The collateral and structural information in this report
reflects the term sheet dated May 5, 2021. The ratings address the
ultimate payment of interest and principal.

(ii)Notional amount certificates that do not have class principal
balances.

(iii)The notional amount will equal the aggregate stated principal
balance of the mortgage loans as of the first day of the related
due period.

N/A--Not applicable.
NR--Not rated.


STARWOOD RESIDENTIAL 2021-2: DBRS Gives (P) B Rating on B2 Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following
Mortgaged-Backed Notes, Series 2021-2 to be issued by Starwood
Residential Mortgage Trust 2021-2 (STAR 2021-2 or the Trust):

-- $172.9 million Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $16.3 million Class A-2 at AA (sf)
-- $25.8 million Class A-3 at A (sf)
-- $16.4 million Class M-1 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $10.5 million Class B-1 at BB (low) (sf)
-- $7.1 million Class B-2 at B (sf)

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

The AAA (sf) rating on the Class A-1 Notes reflects 31.90% of
credit enhancement provided by subordinate notes. The AA (sf), A
(sf), BBB (low) (sf), BB (low) (sf), and B (sf) ratings reflect
25.50%, 15.35%, 8.90%, 4.75%, and 1.95% of credit enhancement,
respectively.

This securitization consists of a portfolio of fixed- and
adjustable-rate, expanded prime and non-prime first-lien
residential mortgages funded by the issuance of the Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2021-2 (the Certificates). The
Certificates are backed by 904 mortgage loans with a total
principal balance of $253,917,040 as of the Cut-Off Date (April 1,
2021).

The originators for the mortgage pool are Impac Mortgage Corp.
(Impac; 56.1%), CIVIC Financial Services (Civic; 20.0%), HomeBridge
Financial Services, Inc. (HomeBridge; 11.5%); and other
originators, each comprising less than 10% of the mortgage pool.
The Servicer of the loans is Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
(SPS).

Although the mortgage loans were originated to satisfy the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) QM and Ability-to-Repay (ATR)
rules where applicable, they were made to borrowers who generally
do not qualify for agency, government or private-label non-agency
prime jumbo products for various reasons. In accordance with the
QM/ATR rules, approximately 30.7% of the loans are designated as
non-QM.

The Sponsor, directly or indirectly through a majority-owned
affiliate, is expected to retain an eligible horizontal residual
interest consisting of the Class XS certificates, representing at
least 5% of the Certificates, to satisfy the credit risk-retention
requirements under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Also, it is
expected that on the Closing Date, an affiliate of the Depositor
will purchase at least a significant portion of the Class B-1,
Class B-2, and Class B-3 certificates.

On or after the earlier of (1) the distribution date in May 2023 or
(2) the date when the aggregate stated principal balance of the
mortgage loans is reduced to 30% of the Cut-Off Date balance,
Starwood Non-Agency Securities Holdings, LLC (SNASH) as Optional
Redemption Holder may redeem all outstanding certificates (Optional
Redemption) at a price equal to the greater of a) unpaid balances
of the mortgage loans plus accrued, unpaid interest and the fair
market value of all real estate-owned (REO) properties, and
deferred amounts (excluding the forbearance Amounts as of the
Cut-off Date) and b) the sum of the remaining aggregate balance of
the Certificates plus accrued and unpaid interest, and any fees,
expenses and indemnity payments due and unpaid to the transaction
parties, including any unreimbursed servicing advances (Optional
Redemption Price). The Optional Redemption Holder is an entity
designated by the Depositor and a 50% affiliate of the Depositor.

The Seller (SMRF TRS LLC) will have the option, but not the
obligation, to repurchase any mortgage loan that becomes 90 or more
days delinquent under the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) method
(or in the case of any mortgage loan that has been subject to a
forbearance plan related to the impact of the Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) pandemic, on any date from and after the date on which
such loan becomes more than 90 days delinquent under the MBA Method
from the end of the forbearance period) at the repurchase price
(par plus interest), provided that such repurchases in aggregate do
not exceed 10% of the total principal balance as of the Cut-Off
Date (excluding any loan repurchased by the Seller related to a
breach of a representation and warranty).

The transaction employs a sequential-pay cash flow structure with a
pro rata principal distribution among the senior tranches subject
to certain performance triggers related to cumulative losses or
delinquencies exceeding a specified threshold (Trigger Event).
Principal proceeds can be used to cover interest shortfalls on the
Class A-1 and Class A-2 certificates (IIPP) before being applied
sequentially to amortize the balances of the senior and
subordinated certificates. For more subordinate certificates,
including Class A-3 certificates after a Trigger Event, principal
proceeds can be used to cover interest shortfalls as the more
senior certificates are paid in full. Also, the excess spread can
be used to cover realized losses first before being allocated to
unpaid Cap Carryover Amounts due to Class A-1 down to Class B-3.

This portfolio contains 61.2% investor loans, which were originated
to investors under debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) programs,
which use property cash flow or the DSCR to qualify borrowers for
income. DSCR is typically calculated as market rental value
(validated by an appraisal report) divided by the principal,
interest, taxes, insurance, and association dues (PITIA).

Coronavirus Impact

The coronavirus pandemic and the resulting isolation measures have
caused an economic contraction, leading to sharp increases in
unemployment rates and income reductions for many consumers. DBRS
Morningstar anticipates that delinquencies may arise in the coming
months for many residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) asset
classes, some meaningfully.

The non-QM sector is a traditional RMBS asset class that consists
of securitizations backed by pools of residential home loans that
may fall outside of the CFPB's ATR rules, which became effective on
January 10, 2014. Non-QM loans encompass the entire credit
spectrum. They range from high-FICO, high-income borrowers who opt
for interest-only (IO) or higher debt-to-income (DTI) ratio
mortgages, to near-prime debtors who have had certain derogatory
pay histories but were cured more than two years ago, to nonprime
borrowers whose credit events were only recently cleared, amongst
others. In addition, some originators offer alternative
documentation or bank statement underwriting to self-employed
borrowers in lieu of verifying income with W-2s or tax returns.
Finally, foreign nationals and real estate investor programs, while
not necessarily non-QM in nature, are often included in non-QM
pools.

As a result of the coronavirus, DBRS Morningstar expects increased
delinquencies and loans on forbearance plans, slower voluntary
prepayment rates, and a potential near-term decline in the values
of the mortgaged properties. Such deteriorations may adversely
affect borrowers' ability to make monthly payments, refinance their
loans, or sell properties in an amount sufficient to repay the
outstanding balance of their loans.

In connection with the economic stress assumed under its moderate
scenario, (see "Global Macroeconomic Scenarios: March 2021 Update,"
published on March 17, 2021), for the non-QM asset class DBRS
Morningstar assumes a combination of higher unemployment rates,
lower voluntary prepayment rates, and more conservative home price
assumptions than what DBRS Morningstar previously used. In
addition, for pools with loans on forbearance plans, DBRS
Morningstar may assume higher loss expectations above and beyond
the coronavirus assumptions. Such assumptions translate to higher
expected losses on the collateral pool and correspondingly higher
credit enhancement.

In the non-QM asset class, while the full effect of the coronavirus
may not occur until a few performance cycles later, DBRS
Morningstar generally believes loans originated to (1) borrowers
with recent credit events, (2) self-employed borrowers, or (3)
higher loan-to-value ratio (LTV) borrowers may be more sensitive to
economic hardships resulting from higher unemployment rates and
lower incomes. Borrowers with prior credit events have exhibited
difficulties in fulfilling payment obligations in the past and may
revert to spotty payment patterns in the near term. Self-employed
borrowers are potentially exposed to more volatile income sources,
which could lead to reduced cash flows generated from their
businesses. Higher LTV borrowers, with lower equity in their
properties, generally have fewer refinance opportunities and
therefore slower prepayments. In addition, certain pools with
elevated geographic concentrations in densely populated urban
metropolitan statistical areas may experience additional stress
from extended lockdown periods and the slowdown of the economy.

In addition, for this transaction, as permitted by the Coronavirus
Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, signed into law on
March 27, 21.8% of the borrowers were on forbearance plans at some
point because the borrowers reported financial hardship related to
coronavirus. These forbearance plans allow temporary payment
holidays, followed by repayment once the forbearance period ends.
SPS, in collaboration with Starwood Non-Agency Lending, LLC (SNAL),
is generally offering borrowers a three-month payment forbearance
plan. Beginning in month four, the borrower can repay all of the
missed mortgage payments at once or opt to go on a repayment plan
to catch up on missed payments for several, typically six months.
During the repayment period, the borrower needs to make regular
payments and additional amounts to catch up on the missed payments.
DBRS Morningstar had a conference call with SPS and SNAL regarding
their approach to the forbearance loans and understood that SPS
would attempt to contact the borrowers before the expiration of the
forbearance period and evaluate the borrowers' capacity to repay
the missed amounts. As a result, SPS, in collaboration with SNAL,
may offer a repayment plan or other forms of payment relief, such
as deferral of the unpaid principal and interest amounts or a loan
modification, in addition to pursuing other loss mitigation
options.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



UBS-CITIGROUP 2011-C1: DBRS Lowers Class F Certs Rating to C(sf)
----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Morningstar downgraded its ratings on four classes of the
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C1
issued by UBS-Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2011-C1,
as follows:

-- Class C to A (low) (sf) from AA (sf)
-- Class D to BB (high) (sf) from A (sf)
-- Class E to CCC (sf) from BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F to C (sf) from CCC (sf)

Classes E, F, and G were removed from Under Review with Negative
Implications, where they were placed on August 6, 2020. The trends
for Classes C and D have been changed to Negative from Stable.
Classes E and F have been assigned ratings that do not carry
trends.

DBRS Morningstar also confirmed the ratings on the following
classes as follows:

-- Class A-3 at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-AB at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class G at C (sf)

The trends for the confirmed classes remain Stable, with the
exception of Class G, which has a rating that does not carry a
trend. DBRS Morningstar placed Interest in Arrears designations for
Classes E, F, and G.

The rating downgrades and trend changes generally reflect DBRS
Morningstar's loss expectations for two top-10 loans in special
servicing: Poughkeepsie Galleria (Prospectus ID#2, 15.8% of the
pool) and Marriott Buffalo Niagara (Prospectus ID#9, 5.5% of the
pool). Both loans have been on the DBRS Morningstar Hotlist because
of cash flow declines and both were transferred to special
servicing in April 2020 because of imminent monetary default.
According to the servicer, the respective sponsors each cited the
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic as the primary contributor
to the defaults. In addition to these two loans, there are another
four loans in special servicing as of the April 2021 remittance,
three of which are backed by hospitality property types. In total,
the specially serviced loans represent 37.8% of the pool balance. A
relatively small number of loans are on the servicer's watchlist,
with just three loans representing 5.2% of the pool, all of which
are being monitored for low debt service coverage ratios (DSCRs)
and were analyzed with elevated probability of default (PoD)
figures to increase the expected loss for this review.

The Poughkeepsie Galleria loan is split pari passu across the
subject and the UBS 2012-C1 transaction, not rated by DBRS
Morningstar. The loan is secured by a regional mall in
Poughkeepsie, New York. As of the April 2021 remittance, the loan
was over 121 days delinquent, with the servicer noting that a
resolution strategy has yet to be determined. According to the
November 2020 appraisal, the property was valued at $68.6 million,
a drastic decline compared with the issuance appraised value of
$237.0 million and well below the outstanding principal balance on
the whole loan of just over $137.0 million. The value decline is
largely the result of sustained cash flow declines from issuance,
as well as the presence of two dark anchor boxes and a
significantly higher cap rate assumed by the appraiser for the 2020
valuation as compared with cap rate assumed in the issuance
appraisal. As of year-end (YE) 2020, the subject loan reported a
DSCR of 0.42 times (x), down from the YE2019 DSCR of 0.89x, and the
YE2018 DSCR of 1.06x.

Collateral anchors at issuance included Sears and JCPenney, but
both retailers closed their locations at the subject mall in 2020
and both spaces remain vacant. Remaining anchors include a
collateral Regal Cinemas, which remains temporarily closed, and a
non-collateral Target and Macy's. The loan sponsor is The Pyramid
Companies (Pyramid), a privately held company that owns 16 regional
malls totaling 17.8 million square feet (sf) located in the
Northeast United States. Pyramid has several commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) loans backed by malls within its
portfolio and most are in special servicing. The firm has been
widely reported to be in financial distress, brought on by the
pandemic, but DBRS Morningstar believes the problems were likely
brewing well before 2020 given the firm's portfolio, which is
largely composed of regional mall properties in tertiary markets
that have been particularly vulnerable amid the changes in shopper
habits that have driven traffic away from mall property types.

Given the sharp decline in appraisal value for Poughkeepsie
Galleria and the other factors contributing to significantly
increased risks for this loan including the low occupancy rate with
two dark anchor boxes, the sponsor's relatively limited access to
capital as a private company with a regionally concentrated
portfolio and the generally poor outlook for the mall's prospects
going forward in the face of the changing retail landscape, DBRS
Morningstar liquidated the loan in the analysis for this review,
with a loss severity in excess of 75.0%.

The Marriott Buffalo loan is secured by a full-service hotel in
Amherst, New York, located within the Buffalo metropolitan
statistical area and approximately 20 miles southeast of Niagara
Falls. According to the March 2021 appraisal obtained by the
special servicer, the property was valued at $14.0 million, another
drastic decline compared with the issuance appraised value of $57.2
million. Like the Poughkeepsie Galleria, the subject loan was also
showing significant performance declines prior to the onset of the
coronavirus pandemic, with these trends contributing to the sharp
drop off in property value. The servicer reported a DSCR of 1.32x
as of September 2019, which was below the already declined DSCR
figures in previous years that hovered near 1.50x. At issuance, the
DBRS Morningstar DSCR was 2.26x.

Hotel revenues were initially above the issuance figures for the
first few years of the life of the loan, but began falling in 2014
and have continued to show year-over-year declines for every year
since. Although the loan was above water, the coronavirus pandemic
delivered an insurmountable challenge in the lack of bookings and
the sponsor has advised the servicer that additional equity will no
longer be contributed to the property or the loan and the servicer
appears to be working to initiate foreclosure proceedings. The
challenges for the hotel are significant and DBRS Morningstar does
not expect there to be any meaningful recovery in the property's
as-is value through the workout and disposition process. Based on a
haircut to the March 2021 valuation, the loan was liquidated in the
analysis for this review, with a loss severity in excess of 54.0%.

As previously mentioned, there are three additional loans in
special servicing backed by hospitality property types, including
the DoubleTree Chattanooga loan (Prospectus ID #10, 4.5% of the
pool), which is secured by a full-service hotel in Chattanooga,
Tennessee, and is listed as current as of the April 2021
remittance. The special servicer is processing a maturity extension
request for the June 2021 maturity date and the sponsor appears to
be cooperating with the special servicer. This loan was generally
performing in line with expectations prior to 2019, when cash flows
dipped slightly because of a combination of slightly lower revenues
and increased expenses as compared with prior years. Given the
stable performance prior to the pandemic and the lack of
significant delinquency since the onset of the coronavirus
pandemic, DBRS Morningstar expects an agreement for a maturity
extension will be reached. There has been no updated appraisal
obtained by the special servicer to date, but the amortization
since issuance has reduced the trust's exposure to $17.9 million,
suggesting the issuance valuation of $33.0 million would have to be
reduced by nearly half to suggest the a loan-to-value ratio (LTV)
in excess of 100.0%.

The other two hotel loans in special servicing, Hospitality
Specialists Portfolio – Pool 1 (Prospectus ID #12, 4.3% of the
pool) and Hospitality Specialists Portfolio – Pool 2 (Prospectus
ID #11, 4.5% of the pool), are each backed by portfolios of three
limited-service hotel properties, all six of which are located in
tertiary markets in Michigan and Illinois. The loans transferred to
special servicing in February 2021 and the special servicer’s
commentary suggests negotiations are in the initial stages for
both. The performance for the Pool 1 loan has generally been in
line with issuance expectations but the Pool 2 loan began reporting
cash flow declines in 2017, when the YE2017 DSCR was reported at
1.16x, where it remained in 2018 before falling to 0.87x at YE2019.
Given the performance declines for Pool 2, and the outstanding
delinquency and transfer to special servicing for both loans, both
were analyzed with an elevated PoD to increase the expected losses
for this review .

As of the April 2021 remittance, 24 of the original 32 loans
remained in the subject pool, representing a collateral reduction
of 41.8% since issuance. 12 of the remaining loans are fully
defeased, representing 50.2% of the pool balance. All of the
remaining loans are scheduled to mature by the end of 2021 and
there has been one loan resolved with a loss to date in the Holiday
Inn Express Cooperstown loan, which was disposed with a nominal
loss of approximately $81,000 in 2016. The remaining pool is
concentrated in retail and hotel properties, which represent 32.8%
and 20.0% of the pool, respectively. The defeasance insulates top
two remaining classes but the likelihood of significant losses for
the two largest loans in special servicing as previously outlined,
as well as the increased risks for the remaining loans in special
servicing and those on the servicer's watchlist support the rating
downgrades and trend changes with this review.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



VELOCITY COMMERCIAL 2021-1: DBRS Gives Prov. B Rating on 3 Classes
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, Series 2021-1 (the Certificates) to be issued by
Velocity Commercial Capital Loan Trust 2021-1 (VCC 2021-1) as
follows:

-- $190.5 million Class A at AAA (sf)
-- $190.5 million Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- $190.5 million Class A-IO at AAA (sf)
-- $24.1 million Class M-1 at AA (low) (sf)
-- $24.1 million Class M1-A at AA (low) (sf)
-- $24.1 million Class M1-IO at AA (low) (sf)
-- $9.7 million Class M-2 at A (low) (sf)
-- $9.7 million Class M2-A at A (low) (sf)
-- $9.7 million Class M2-IO at A (low) (sf)
-- $5.0 million Class M-3 at BBB (sf)
-- $5.0 million Class M3-A at BBB (sf)
-- $5.0 million Class M3-IO at BBB (sf)
-- $7.0 million Class M-4 at BB (sf)
-- $7.0 million Class M4-A at BB (sf)
-- $7.0 million Class M4-IO at BB (sf)
-- $4.1 million Class M-5 at B (sf)
-- $4.1 million Class M5-A at B (sf)
-- $4.1 million Class M5-IO at B (sf)

Classes A-IO, M1-IO, M2-IO, M3-IO, M4-IO, and M5-IO are
interest-only certificates. The class balances represent notional
amounts.

Classes A, M-1, M-2, M-3, M-4, and M-5 are exchangeable
certificates. These classes can be exchanged for combinations of
initial exchangeable certificates as specified in the offering
documents.

The AAA (sf) ratings on the Certificates reflect 28.00% of credit
enhancement provided by subordinated certificates. The AA (low)
(sf), A (low) (sf), BBB (sf), BB (sf), and B (sf) ratings reflect
18.90%, 15.25%, 13.35%, 10.70%, and 9.15% of credit enhancement,
respectively.

Other than the classes specified above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

VCC 2021-1 is a securitization of a portfolio of newly originated
fixed- and adjustable-rate, first-lien residential mortgages
collateralized by investor properties with one to four units
(residential investor loans) and small-balance commercial mortgages
(SBC) collateralized by various types of commercial, multifamily
rental, and mixed-use properties. The securitization is funded by
the issuance of the Certificates, which are backed by 672 mortgage
loans with a total principal balance of $264,527,798 as of the
Cut-Off Date (April 1, 2021).

Approximately 49.0% of the pool comprises residential investor
loans and about 51.0% of SBC loans. All of the loans in this
securitization were originated by Velocity Commercial Capital, LLC
(Velocity). The loans were underwritten by Velocity to program
guidelines for business-purpose loans where the lender generally
expects the property (or its value) to be the primary source of
repayment (No Ratio). The lender reviews the mortgagor's credit
profile, though the lender does not rely on the borrower's income
to make its credit decision. However, the lender considers the
property-level cash flows or minimum debt-service coverage ratio
(DSCR) in underwriting SBC loans with a balance over $500,000.
Because the loans were made to investors for business purposes,
they are exempt from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's
Ability-to-Repay rules and TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure rule.

The proposed pool is about one month seasoned on a weighted-average
(WA) basis, although seasoning may span from zero up to six months.
Except for 11 loans (1.8% of the pool) that have missed one
payment, the loans have been performing since origination. Of the
11 loans that were 30 days delinquent as of the Cut-Off Date, eight
have cured the delinquency and become current.

PHH Mortgage Corporation will service all loans within the pool for
a servicing fee of 0.30% per annum. In addition, Velocity will act
as a Special Servicer servicing the loans that defaulted or became
60 or more days delinquent under the Mortgage Bankers Association
(MBA) method and other loans, as defined in the transaction
documents (Specially Serviced Loans). The Special Servicer will be
entitled to receive compensation based on an annual fee of 0.75%
and the balance of Specially Serviced Loans. Also, the Special
Servicer is entitled to a liquidation fee equal to 2.00% of the net
proceeds from the liquidation of a Specially Serviced Loan, as
described in the transaction documents.

The Servicer will fund advances of delinquent principal and
interest (P&I) until the advances deemed unrecoverable. Also, the
Servicer is obligated to make advances with respect to taxes,
insurance premiums, and reasonable costs incurred in the course of
servicing and disposing properties.

U.S. Bank National Association (rated AA (high) with a Negative
trend by DBRS Morningstar) will act as the Trustee, Paying Agent,
and Custodian.

The Sponsor, directly or indirectly through a majority-owned
affiliate, is expected to retain an eligible horizontal residual
interest consisting of the Class P and Class XS Certificates,
representing at least 5% of the of the fair value of all
Certificates, to satisfy the credit risk-retention requirements
under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
regulations promulgated thereunder. The Sponsor is also expected to
retain the Class M-7 Certificates.

On or after the later of the (1) three-year anniversary of the
Closing Date or (2) date when the aggregate stated principal
balance of the mortgage loans is reduced to 30% of the Closing Date
balance, the Depositor may purchase all outstanding Certificates
(Optional Purchase) at a price equal to the sum of the remaining
aggregate balance of the Certificates plus accrued and unpaid
interest, and any fees, expenses, and indemnity payments due and
unpaid to the transaction parties, including any unreimbursed P&I
and servicing advances, and other amounts due as applicable. The
Optional Purchase will be conducted concurrently with a qualified
liquidation of the Issuer.

Additionally, if on any date on which the unpaid mortgage loan
balance and the value of real estate owned (REO) properties has
declined to less than 10% of the initial mortgage loan balance as
of the Cut-off Date, the Directing Holder, the Special Servicer, or
the Servicer, in that order of priority, may purchase all of the
mortgages, REO properties, and any other properties from the Issuer
(Optional Termination) at a price specified in the transaction
documents. The Optional Termination will be conducted as a
qualified liquidation of the Issuer. The Directing Holder
(initially, the Seller) is the representative selected by the
holders of more than 50% of the outstanding subordinate
certificates with the lowest priority of principal distributions.

The transaction uses a structure sometimes referred to as a
modified pro rata structure. Prior to the Class A credit
enhancement (CE) falling below 10.0% of the loan balance as of the
Cut-off Date (Class A Minimum CE Event), the principal
distributions allow for amortization of all senior and subordinate
bonds based on CE targets set at different levels for performing
(same CE as at issuance) and nonperforming (higher CE than at
issuance) loans. Each Class's target principal balance is
determined based on the CE targets and the performing and
nonperforming (those that are 90 or more days MBA delinquent, in
foreclosure and REO, and subject to a servicing modification within
the prior 12 months) loan amounts. As such, the principal payments
are paid on a pro rata basis, up to each Class's target principal
balance, so long as no loans in the pool are nonperforming. If the
share of nonperforming loans grows, the corresponding CE target
increases. Thus, the principal payment amount increases for the
senior and senior subordinate classes and falls for the more
subordinate bonds. The goal is to distribute the appropriate amount
of principal to the senior and subordinate bonds each month, to
always maintain the desired level of CE, based on the performing
and nonperforming pool percentages. After the Class A Minimum CE
Event, the principal distributions are made sequentially.

Relative to the sequential pay structure, the modified pro rata
structure is more sensitive to the timing of the projected defaults
and losses as the losses may be applied at a time when the amount
of credit support is reduced as the bonds' principal balances
amortize over a life of the transaction. That said, the excess
spread can be used to cover realized losses after being allocated
to the unpaid net WA coupon shortfalls.

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (CMBS) METHODOLOGY

Of the 303 loans, 294 loans, representing 97.8% of the SBC portion
of the pool, have a fixed interest rate with a straight average of
8.1%. The nine floating-rate loans have interest rate floors
(excluding rate margins) ranging from 2.49% to 5.49% with a
straight average of 3.96% and interest rate margins ranging from
4.00% to 5.00% with a straight average of 4.56%. To determine the
probability of default (POD) and loss given default inputs in the
CMBS Insight Model, DBRS Morningstar applied a stress to the
various indexes that corresponded with the remaining fully extended
term of the loans and added the respective contractual loan spread
to determine a stressed interest rate over the loan term. DBRS
Morningstar looked to the greater of the interest rate floor or the
DBRS Morningstar stressed index rate when calculating stressed debt
service. The WA modeled coupon rate was 7.83%. The loans have
original term lengths of 30 years and fully amortize over 30-year
schedules. When the cut-off loan balances were measured against the
DBRS Morningstar net cash flow (NCF) and their respective actual
constants or stressed interest rates, there were 232 loans,
representing 78.9% of the SBC pool, with term DSCRs below 1.15
times (x), a threshold indicative of a higher likelihood of term
default.

All SBC loans were originated between September 2020 and March
2021, resulting in minimal seasoning of 2.1 months on average. The
SBC pool has a WA original term length of 360 months, or 30 years,
with a WA remaining term of 358 months, or 29.8 years. Based on the
current loan amount, which reflects approximately five basis points
of amortization, and the current appraised values, the SBC pool has
an average loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of 62.3%. However, DBRS
Morningstar made LTV adjustments to 57 loans that had an implied
capitalization rate more than 200 basis points lower than a set of
minimal capitalization rates established by the DBRS Morningstar
Market Rank. The DBRS Morningstar minimal capitalization rates
range from 5.0% for properties in DBRS Morningstar Market Rank 8 to
8.0% for properties in Market Rank 1. This resulted in a higher
DBRS Morningstar LTV of 69.6%. Lastly, all loans fully amortize
over their respective remaining terms, resulting in a 100.0%
expected amortization. This amount of amortization is greater than
typical of CMBS conduit pools as DBRS Morningstar's research
indicates that for CMBS conduit transactions securitized between
2000 and 2019 average amortization by year has ranged between 7.50%
to 21.09%, with an overall medial rate of 18.80%.

As contemplated and explained in DBRS Morningstar's "Rating North
American CMBS Interest-Only Certificates" methodology, the most
significant risk to an interest-only (IO) cash flow stream is term
default risk. As noted in that methodology, for a pool of
approximately 63,000 CMBS loans that fully cycled through to their
maturity dates, DBRS Morningstar noted that the average total
default rate across all property types was approximately 17%, the
refinance default rate was 6% (approximately one-third of the total
rate), and the term default rate was approximately 11%. DBRS
Morningstar recognizes the muted impact of refinance risk on IO
certificates by notching the IO rating up by one notch from the
Reference Obligation rating. When using the 10-year Idealized
Default Table default probability to derive a POD for a CMBS bond
from its rating, DBRS Morningstar estimates that, in general, a
one-third reduction in the CMBS Reference Obligation POD maps to a
tranche rating that is approximately one notch higher than the
Reference Obligation or the Applicable Reference Obligation,
whichever is appropriate. Therefore, following similar logic
regarding term default risk supported the rationale for DBRS
Morningstar to reduce the POD in the CMBS Insight Model by one
notch because refinance risk is largely absent for this SBC pool of
loans.

STRENGTHS – SBC LOANS

-- The CMBS pool has a WA expected loss of 3.79%, which is lower
than recently analyzed comparable small balance transactions.
Contributing factors to the low expected loss include pool
diversity, moderate leverage, and fully amortizing loans.

-- The SBC pool is quite diverse based on loan size, with an
average balance of $445,327, a concentration profile equivalent to
that of a transaction with 190 equal-size loans, and a top-10 loan
concentration of 12.7%. Increased pool diversity helps to insulate
the higher-rated classes from event risk.

-- The loans are mostly secured by traditional property types
(i.e., retail, multifamily, office, and industrial) with no
exposure to higher-volatility property types, such as hotels,
self-storage, or manufactured housing communities.

-- All 303 loans in the SBC pool fully amortize over their
respective remaining loan terms between 354 and 360 months,
reducing refinance risk.

CHALLENGES AND STABILIZING FACTORS – SBC LOANS

-- As classified by DBRS Morningstar for modeling purposes, the
SBC pool contains a significant exposure to retail (22.4% of the
SBC pool) and a smaller exposure to office (11.7% of the SBC pool),
which are two of the higher-volatility asset types. Loans counted
as retail include those identified as automotive and potentially
commercial condo. Combined, they represent more than one-third of
the pool balance. Retail, which has struggled because of the)
pandemic, comprises the second-largest asset type in the
transaction.

-- DBRS Morningstar applied a 20.0% reduction to the NCF for
retail properties and a 30.0% reduction for office assets in the
SBC pool, which is above the average NCF reduction applied for
comparable property types in CMBS-analyzed deals.

-- Multifamily comprises the third-largest property type
concentration in the SBC pool (18.4%); based on DBRS Morningstar's
research, multifamily properties securitized in conduit
transactions have had lower default rates than most other property
types.

-- DBRS Morningstar did not perform site inspections on loans
within its sample for this transaction. Instead, DBRS Morningstar
relied upon analysis of third-party reports and online searches to
determine property quality assessments. Of the 50 loans DBRS
Morningstar sampled, 24.9% were Average quality and 75.1% were
Average – (38.0%), Below Average (34.2%), or Poor (2.9%)
quality.

-- DBRS Morningstar assumed unsampled loans were Average –
quality, which has a slightly increased POD level. This is more
conservative than the assessments from sampled loans and is
consistent with other SBC transactions.

-- Limited property-level information was available for DBRS
Morningstar to review. Asset summary reports, property condition
reports, Phase I/II environmental site assessment (ESA) reports,
and historical financial cash flows were generally not available
for review in conjunction with this securitization.

-- DBRS Morningstar received and reviewed appraisals for the top
30 loans, which represent 28.0% of the SBC pool balance. These
appraisals were issued between August 2020 and March 2021 when the
respective loans were originated. DBRS Morningstar was able to
perform loan-level cash flow analysis on the top 30 loans in the
pool. The haircuts ranged from -4.1% to -37.0%, with an average of
-18.1%; however, DBRS Morningstar applied more conservative
haircuts on the unsampled loans.

-- No ESA reports were provided and are not required by the
Issuer; however, all of the loans are placed onto an environmental
insurance policy that provides coverage to the Issuer and the
securitization trust in the event of a claim.

-- DBRS Morningstar received limited borrower information, net
worth or liquidity information, and credit history.

-- DBRS Morningstar generally initially assumed loans had Weak
sponsor strength scores, which increases the stress on the default
rate. The initial assumption of Weak reflects the generally less
sophisticated nature of small balance borrowers and assessments
from past small balance transactions.

-- Furthermore, DBRS Morningstar received a 12-month pay history
on each loan as of March 31, 2021. If any loan had more than two
late pays within this period or was currently 30 days past due,
DBRS Morningstar applied an additional stress to the default rate.
This occurred for only nine loans, representing 3.4% of the SBC
pool balance.

-- Finally, DBRS Morningstar received a borrower FICO score as of
March 31, 2021, for all 303 loans, with an average FICO score of
725. While the CMBS Methodology does not contemplate FICO scores,
the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) Methodology does
and would characterize a FICO score of 725 as near-prime, whereas
prime is considered greater than 750. Borrowers with a FICO score
of 725 could generally be described as potentially having had
previous credit events (foreclosure, bankruptcy, etc.) but, if they
did, it is likely that these credit events were cleared about two
to five years ago.

RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (RMBS) METHODOLOGY

The collateral pool consists of 369 mortgage loans with a total
balance of approximately $129.6 million collateralized by one- to
four-unit investment properties. The mortgage loans were
underwritten by Velocity to No Ratio program guidelines for
business-purpose loans.

The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic and the resulting
isolation measures have caused an economic contraction, leading to
sharp increases in unemployment rates and income reductions for
many consumers. DBRS Morningstar anticipates that delinquencies may
arise in the coming months for many RMBS asset classes, some
meaningfully.

The non-Qualified Mortgage (QM) sector is a traditional RMBS asset
class that consists of securitizations backed by pools of
residential home loans that may fall outside of the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau's Ability-to-Repay rules, which became
effective on January 10, 2014. Non-QM loans encompass the entire
credit spectrum. They range from high-FICO, high-income borrowers
who opt for IO or higher debt-to-income ratio mortgages, to
near-prime debtors who have had certain derogatory pay histories
but were cured more than two years ago, to nonprime borrowers whose
credit events were only recently cleared, among others. In
addition, some originators offer alternative documentation or bank
statement underwriting to self-employed borrowers in lieu of
verifying income with W-2s or tax returns. Finally, foreign
nationals and real estate investor programs, while not necessarily
non-QM in nature, are often included in non-QM pools. Of note, all
residential investor loans in the pool are exempt from the QM
Rules.

As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, DBRS Morningstar expects
increased delinquencies and loans on forbearance plans, slower
voluntary prepayment rates, and a potential near-term decline in
the values of the mortgaged properties. Such deteriorations may
adversely affect borrowers' ability to make monthly payments,
refinance their loans, or sell properties in an amount sufficient
to repay the outstanding balance of their loans.

In connection with the economic stress assumed under its moderate
scenario (see "Global Macroeconomic Scenarios: Implications for
Credit Ratings," published on April 16, 2020) for the non-QM asset
class and residential investor loans DBRS Morningstar assumes a
combination of higher unemployment rates, lower voluntary
prepayment rates, and more conservative home price assumptions than
what DBRS Morningstar previously used. In addition, for pools with
loans on forbearance plans, DBRS Morningstar may assume higher loss
expectations above and beyond the coronavirus assumptions. Such
assumptions translate to higher expected losses on the collateral
pool and correspondingly higher credit enhancement.

In the non-QM asset class and residential investor loans, while the
full effect of the coronavirus may not occur until a few
performance cycles later, DBRS Morningstar generally believes loans
originated to (1) borrowers with recent credit events, (2)
self-employed borrowers, or (3) higher LTV borrowers may be more
sensitive to economic hardships resulting from higher unemployment
rates and lower incomes. Borrowers with prior credit events have
exhibited difficulties in fulfilling payment obligations in the
past and may revert to spotty payment patterns in the near term.
Self-employed borrowers are potentially exposed to more volatile
income sources, which could lead to reduced cash flows generated
from their businesses. Higher LTV borrowers, with less equity in
their properties, generally have fewer refinance opportunities and
therefore slower prepayments. In addition, certain pools with
elevated geographic concentrations in densely populated urban
metropolitan statistical areas may experience additional stress
from extended lockdown periods and the slowdown of the economy.

In addition, for this transaction, as permitted by the Coronavirus
Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, signed into law on March
27, 2020, no borrowers are on forbearance plans because the
borrowers reported financial hardship related to coronavirus. These
forbearance plans allow temporary payment holidays, followed by
repayment once the forbearance period ends. In 2020, Velocity, in
collaboration with its servicers, generally offered borrowers a
three-month payment forbearance plan. Beginning in month four, the
borrower could repay all of the missed mortgage payments at once or
opt to go on a repayment plan to catch up on missed payments for
several, typically six months. During the repayment period, the
borrower needed to make regular payments and additional amounts to
catch up on the missed payments. DBRS Morningstar had conference
calls with PHH and Velocity regarding their approach to the
forbearance loans and understood that if Velocity begins offering
forbearance plans again in the future, PHH or Velocity will attempt
to contact the borrowers before the expiration of the forbearance
period and evaluate the borrowers' capacity to repay the missed
amounts. As a result, PHH, in collaboration with Velocity, may
offer a repayment plan or other forms of payment relief, such as
deferral of the unpaid principal and interest amounts or a loan
modification, in addition to pursuing other loss mitigation
options.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



VERUS SECURITIZATION 2021-R3: DBRS Gives (P)B Rating on B-2 Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following
Mortgage-Backed Notes, Series 2021-R3 to be issued by Verus
Securitization Trust 2021-R3:

-- $329.7 million Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $28.7 million Class A-2 at AA (sf)
-- $42.2 million Class A-3 at A (sf)
-- $26.0 million Class M-1 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $14.4 million Class B-1 at BB (sf)
-- $12.3 million Class B-2 at B (sf)

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

The AAA (sf) rating on the Class A-1 Notes reflects 27.75% of
credit enhancement provided by subordinate notes. The AA (sf), A
(sf), BBB (low) (sf), BB (sf), and B (sf) ratings reflect 21.45%,
12.20%, 6.50%, 3.35%, and 0.65% of credit enhancement,
respectively.

This securitization is a portfolio of seasoned fixed- and
adjustable-rate, expanded prime and nonprime, first-lien
residential mortgages funded by the issuance of the Notes. The
Notes are backed by 1,187 mortgage loans with a total principal
balance of $456,322,141 as of the Cut-Off Date (May 1, 2021).

The mortgage pool consists primarily of loans from collapsed
previously issued Verus transactions.

The loans are on average more seasoned than a typical new
origination non-Qualified Mortgage (non-QM) securitization. The
DBRS Morningstar calculated weighted-average loan age is 29 months,
and all of the loans are seasoned 24 months or more. Within the
pool, 97.0% of the loans are current, 2.2% are 30 days delinquent,
and 0.8% are 60 days or more delinquent. All loans that remain 60
days or more delinquent on the closing date will be removed from
the pool. The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)-affected loans account
for 34.8% of the pool and are described in further detail below.

The originators for the mortgage pool are Sprout Mortgage (21.2%)
and other originators, each comprising less than 10.0% of the
mortgage loans. The Servicers of the loans are Shellpoint Mortgage
Servicing (79.1%) and Specialized Loan Servicing LLC (SLS; 20.9%).

Although the mortgage loans were originated to satisfy the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) Ability-to-Repay (ATR) rules,
they were made to borrowers who generally do not qualify for
agency, government, or private-label nonagency prime jumbo products
for various reasons. In accordance with the Qualified Mortgage
(QM)/ATR rules, 46.7% of the loans are designated as non-QM and one
loan is designated as QM rebuttable presumption. Approximately
53.3% of the loans are made to investors for business purposes and,
hence, are not subject to the QM/ATR rules.

The sponsor, directly or indirectly through a majority-owned
affiliate, will retain an eligible vertical residual interest
consisting of not less than 5% of each Note, to satisfy the credit
risk-retention requirements under Section 15G of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

On or after the earlier of (1) the Distribution Date occurring in
May 2023 or (2) the date when the aggregate stated principal
balance of the mortgage loans is reduced to 30% of the Cut-Off Date
balance, the Paying Agent, at the Controlling Holder's option, may
redeem all of the outstanding Notes at a price equal to the greater
of (A) the class balances of the related Notes plus accrued and
unpaid interest, including any cap carryover amounts and (B) the
class balances of the related Notes less than 90 days delinquent
with accrued unpaid interest plus fair market value of the loans 90
days or more delinquent and real estate owned properties (Optional
Redemption Price). After such purchase, the Paying Agent must
complete a qualified liquidation, which requires (1) a complete
liquidation of assets within the Trust and (2) proceeds to be
distributed to the appropriate holders of regular or residual
interests.

If the Sponsor (or an affiliate) is not the Controlling Holder and
there is more than one Class XS Noteholder, a Third-Party Auction
may be requested. The Third-Party Auction Bid must equal or exceed
the Optional Redemption Price for the qualified liquidation to take
place.

The P&I Advancing Party or servicer in the case of loans serviced
by SLS will fund advances of delinquent principal and interest
(P&I) on any mortgage until such loan becomes 90 days delinquent.
The P&I Advancing Party or servicer has no obligation to advance
P&I on a mortgage approved for a forbearance plan during its
related forbearance period. The Servicers, however, are obligated
to make advances in respect of taxes, insurance premiums, and
reasonable costs incurred in the course of servicing and disposing
properties. The three-month advancing mechanism may increase the
probability of periodic interest shortfalls in the current economic
environment affected by the coronavirus pandemic. As borrowers may
seek forbearance on their mortgages in the coming months, P&I
collections may be reduced meaningfully.

This transaction incorporates a sequential-pay cash flow structure
with a pro rata feature among the senior tranches. Principal
proceeds can be used to cover interest shortfalls on the Class A-1
and A-2 Notes sequentially after a Trigger Event. For more
subordinated Notes, principal proceeds can be used to cover
interest shortfalls as the more senior Notes are paid in full.
Furthermore, excess spread can be used to cover realized losses and
prior period bond writedown amounts first before being allocated to
unpaid cap carryover amounts to Class A-1 down to Class B-2.

CORONAVIRUS IMPACT

The coronavirus pandemic and the resulting isolation measures have
caused an economic contraction, leading to sharp increases in
unemployment rates and income reductions for many consumers. DBRS
Morningstar anticipates that delinquencies may continue to rise in
the coming months for many residential mortgage-backed securities
(RMBS) asset classes, some meaningfully.

The non-QM sector is a traditional RMBS asset class that consists
of securitizations backed by pools of residential home loans that
may fall outside of the CFPB's ATR rules, which became effective on
January 10, 2014. Non-QM loans encompass the entire credit
spectrum. They range from high-FICO, high-income borrowers who opt
for interest-only or higher debt-to-income ratio mortgages, to
near-prime debtors who have had certain derogatory pay histories
but were cured more than two years ago, to nonprime borrowers whose
credit events were only recently cleared, among others. In
addition, some originators offer alternative documentation or bank
statement underwriting to self-employed borrowers in lieu of
verifying income with W-2s or tax returns. Finally, foreign
nationals and real estate investor programs, while not necessarily
non-QM in nature, are often included in non-QM pools.

As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, DBRS Morningstar expects
increased delinquencies, loans on forbearance plans, and a
potential near-term decline in the values of the mortgaged
properties. Such deteriorations may adversely affect borrowers'
ability to make monthly payments, refinance their loans, or sell
properties in an amount sufficient to repay the outstanding balance
of their loans.

In connection with the economic stress assumed under its moderate
scenario (see "Global Macroeconomic Scenarios: March 2021 Update,"
published on March 17, 2021), for the non-QM asset class, DBRS
Morningstar applies more severe market value decline (MVD)
assumptions across all rating categories than what it previously
used. Such MVD assumptions are derived through a fundamental home
price approach based on the forecast unemployment rates and GDP
growth outlined in the aforementioned moderate scenario. In
addition, for pools with loans on forbearance plans, DBRS
Morningstar may assume higher loss expectations above and beyond
the coronavirus assumptions. Such assumptions translate to higher
expected losses on the collateral pool and correspondingly higher
credit enhancement.

In the non-QM asset class, while the full effect of the coronavirus
pandemic may not occur until a few performance cycles later, DBRS
Morningstar generally believes loans originated to (1) borrowers
with recent credit events, (2) self-employed borrowers, or (3)
higher loan-to-value ratio (LTV) borrowers may be more sensitive to
economic hardships resulting from higher unemployment rates and
lower incomes. Borrowers with prior credit events have exhibited
difficulties in fulfilling payment obligations in the past and may
revert to spotty payment patterns in the near term. Self-employed
borrowers are potentially exposed to more volatile income sources,
which could lead to reduced cash flows generated from their
businesses. Higher LTV borrowers, with lower equity in their
properties, generally have fewer refinance opportunities and
therefore slower prepayments. In addition, certain pools with
elevated geographic concentrations in densely populated urban
metropolitan statistical areas may experience additional stress
from extended lockdown periods and the slowdown of the economy.

In addition, for this transaction, as permitted by the Coronavirus
Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, signed into law on
March 27, 2020, 34.8% (as of May 1, 2021) of the borrowers had been
granted forbearance or deferral plans because of financial hardship
related to the coronavirus pandemic. These forbearance plans allow
temporary payment holidays, followed by repayment once the
forbearance period ends. The Servicers, in collaboration with the
Servicing Administrator, are generally offering borrowers a
three-month payment forbearance plan. Beginning in month four, the
borrower can repay all of the missed mortgage payments at once or
opt for other loss mitigation options. Prior to the end of the
applicable forbearance period, the Servicers will contact each
related borrower to identify the options available to address
related forborne payment amounts. As a result, the Servicers, in
conjunction with or at the direction of the Servicing
Administrator, may offer a repayment plan or other forms of payment
relief, such as deferral of the unpaid P&I amounts or a loan
modification, in addition to pursuing other loss mitigation
options.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.


VISIO 2021-1R: DBRS Finalizes B(low) Rating on Class B-2 Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. finalized its provisional ratings on the following
Mortgage-Backed Notes, Series 2021-1R issued by Visio 2021-1R Trust
(Visio 2021-1R):

-- $120.9 million Class A-1 at AAA (sf)
-- $12.6 million Class A-2 at AA (sf)
-- $19.1 million Class A-3 at A (low) (sf)
-- $7.2 million Class M-1 at BBB (low) (sf)
-- $8.6 million Class B-1 at BB (low) (sf)
-- $4.6 million Class B-2 at B (low) (sf)

The AAA (sf) rating on the Class A-1 Notes reflects 31.65% of
credit enhancement provided by subordinated Notes. The AA (sf), A
(low) (sf), BBB (low) (sf), BB (low) (sf), and B (low) (sf) ratings
reflect 24.50%, 13.70%, 9.65%, 4.80%, and 2.20% of credit
enhancement, respectively.

Other than the specified classes above, DBRS Morningstar does not
rate any other classes in this transaction.

This securitization is a portfolio of fixed- and adjustable-rate,
expanded prime and nonprime first-lien residential mortgages funded
by the issuance of the Notes. This transaction marks the eighth
securitization from Residential Credit Opportunities II, LLC (the
Sponsor) backed entirely by loans originated to investors under
debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) programs. The Notes are backed
by 936 mortgage loans with a total principal balance of
$176,826,267 as of the Cut-Off Date (March 31, 2021).

Of the 936 loans, 626 loans (65.3% of the pool) are from collapsed
previously issued Visio transactions and the remaining loans
(34.7%) are recently originated mortgages not previously
securitized.

Visio Financial Services Inc. and Lima One Capital, LLC are the
originators for the mortgage pool. The servicer of the loans is
Servis One, Inc. doing business as BSI Financial Services.

The mortgage loans were underwritten to program guidelines for
business-purpose loans that are designed to rely on property value,
the mortgagor's credit profile, and the DSCR, where applicable.
Since the loans were made to investors for business purposes, they
are exempt from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB's)
Ability-to-Repay (ATR) rules and TILA/RESPA Integrated Disclosure
rule.

Residential Credit Opportunities II, LLC (the Sponsor), directly or
indirectly through a majority-owned affiliate, will retain an
eligible horizontal residual interest consisting of the Class B-1,
B-2, B-3, and XS Notes, representing at least 5% of the Notes, to
satisfy the risk-retention requirement in the European Union
Securitization Regulation and United Kingdom Securitization
Regulation, and subsequently, the credit risk-retention
requirements under Section 15G of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

On or after the earlier of (1) the 24th payment date or (2) the
date when the aggregate stated principal balance of the mortgage
loans is reduced to 30% of the Cut-Off Date balance, the Depositor
may redeem all outstanding Notes at a price equal to the sum of
outstanding Note amounts plus accrued and unpaid interest as well
as unreimbursed advances, fees, and indemnification amounts of the
transaction parties.

The Sponsor will have the option, but not the obligation, to
purchase any mortgage loan that becomes 60 or more days delinquent
under the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) method at par plus
interest, provided that such purchases in aggregate do not exceed
10% of the total principal balance as of the Cut-Off Date.

The Servicer will not fund advances of delinquent principal and
interest (P&I) on any mortgage. The Servicer is obligated to make
advances in respect of taxes, insurance premiums, and reasonable
costs incurred in the course of servicing and disposing of
properties.

Similar to some nonqualified mortgage (non-QM) deals issued during
the Coronavirus Disease pandemic, the transaction employs a
sequential-pay cash flow structure. However, Visio 2021-1R contains
certain distinct aspects.

Unique Transaction Features

Within the priority of payments, when the credit event is in
effect, interest payments or principal payments will not be made to
Class B-1, B-2, and B-3 Notes until the Class A-1, A-2, A-3, and
M-1 Notes' balances are reduced to zero. This structure
redistributes the cash flow from junior bonds and provides further
protection to the more senior bonds.

In addition, unlike most non-QM securitizations where the servicers
fund advances of delinquent P&I on loans up to 180 days delinquent,
for this transaction, the Servicer will not fund any P&I advances.
The Servicer, however, is obligated to make advances in respect of
taxes, insurance premiums, and reasonable costs incurred in the
course of servicing and disposing of properties. The no advancing
mechanism may increase the probability of periodic interest
shortfalls in the current economic environment affected by the
pandemic. As a large number of borrowers seek forbearance on their
mortgages in the coming months, P&I collections may be reduced
meaningfully.

CORONAVIRUS IMPACT

The coronavirus pandemic and the resulting isolation measures have
caused an economic contraction, leading to sharp increases in
unemployment rates and income reductions for many consumers. DBRS
Morningstar anticipates that delinquencies may continue to rise in
the coming months for many residential mortgage-backed securities
(RMBS) asset classes.

The non-QM sector is a traditional RMBS asset class that consists
of securitizations backed by pools of residential home loans that
may fall outside of the CFPB's ATR rules, which became effective on
January 10, 2014. Non-QM loans encompass the entire credit
spectrum. They range from high-FICO, high-income borrowers who opt
for interest-only or higher debt-to-income ratio mortgages, to
near-prime debtors who have had certain derogatory pay histories
but were cured more than two years ago, to nonprime borrowers whose
credit events were only recently cleared, among others. In
addition, some originators offer alternative documentation or bank
statement underwriting to self-employed borrowers in lieu of
verifying income with W-2s or tax returns. Finally, foreign
nationals and real estate investor programs, while not necessarily
non-QM in nature, are often included in non-QM pools.

As a result of the coronavirus, DBRS Morningstar has seen increased
delinquencies and loans on forbearance plans and expects a
potential near-term decline in the values of the mortgaged
properties. Such deteriorations may adversely affect borrowers'
ability to make monthly payments, refinance their loans, or sell
properties in an amount sufficient to repay the outstanding balance
of their loans.

In connection with the economic stress assumed under its moderate
scenario (see Global Macroeconomic Scenarios: March 2021 Update,
published on March 17, 2021), for the non-QM asset class, DBRS
Morningstar applies more severe market value decline (MVD)
assumptions across all rating categories than what it previously
used. Such MVD assumptions are derived through a fundamental home
price approach based on the forecast unemployment rates and GDP
growth outlined in the aforementioned moderate scenario. In
addition, for pools with loans on forbearance plans, DBRS
Morningstar may assume higher loss expectations above and beyond
the coronavirus assumptions. Such assumptions translate to higher
expected losses on the collateral pool and correspondingly higher
credit enhancement.

In the non-QM asset class, while the full effect of the coronavirus
may not occur until a few performance cycles later, DBRS
Morningstar generally believes loans originated to (1) borrowers
with recent credit events, (2) self-employed borrowers, or (3)
higher loan-to-value ratio (LTV) borrowers may be more sensitive to
economic hardships resulting from higher unemployment rates and
lower incomes. Borrowers with prior credit events have exhibited
difficulties in fulfilling payment obligations in the past and may
revert to spotty payment patterns in the near term. Self-employed
borrowers are potentially exposed to more volatile income sources,
which could lead to reduced cash flows generated from their
businesses. Higher LTV borrowers, with lower equity in their
properties, generally have fewer refinance opportunities and
therefore slower prepayments. In addition, certain pools with
elevated geographic concentrations in densely populated urban
metropolitan statistical areas may experience additional stress
from extended lockdown periods and the slowdown of the economy.

In addition, for this transaction, as permitted by the Coronavirus
Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, signed into law on March
27, 2020, the borrower of one mortgage loan (0.7% of the pool) is
under a forbearance program because their financial situation may
be adversely affected by the coronavirus; additionally, the
borrowers of 21 mortgage loans (3.8% of the pool) have gone through
their forbearance periods and have begun their repayment plans.
These forbearance plans allow partial payment relief for an initial
period, followed by repayment once the relief period ends. In order
to qualify for a forbearance plan as a result of the pandemic, the
Servicer will require the related mortgagor for the related
Mortgage Loan to complete a hardship affidavit to certify the
hardship is related to the coronavirus. The Servicer, in
collaboration with the Depositor, is offering borrowers (who are
contractually current prior to applying) a nine-month forbearance
plan where the mortgagor pays 50% of its contractual monthly
payment for each of the first three months during the plan and 125%
of its contractual monthly payment for each of the last six months
during the plan. In order to qualify for such forbearance plan, the
borrowers must provide documents to show coronavirus-related
financial hardship and must be contractually current prior to
applying. Further, the Servicer may offer a repayment plan or other
forms of payment relief, such as deferral of the unpaid P&I amounts
or a loan modification, in addition to pursuing other loss
mitigation options.

For this deal, DBRS Morningstar applied additional assumptions to
evaluate the impact of potential cash flow disruptions on the rated
tranches, stemming from (1) lower P&I collections and (2) limited
servicing advances on delinquent P&I. These assumptions include:

(1) Increasing delinquencies for the AAA (sf) and AA (sf) rating
levels for the first 12 months.

(2) Increasing delinquencies for the A (low) (sf) and below rating
levels for the first nine months.

(3) Applying no voluntary prepayments for the AAA (sf) and AA (sf)
rating levels for the first 12 months.

(4) Delaying the receipt of liquidation proceeds for the AAA (sf)
and AA (sf) rating levels for the first 12 months.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.


VMC FINANCE 2021-FL4: DBRS Gives Prov. B(low) Rating on G Notes
---------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. assigned provisional ratings to the following classes of
notes to be issued by VMC Finance 2021-FL4 LLC:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class A-S at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (low) (sf)
-- Class C at A (low) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (low) (sf)
-- Class G at B (low) (sf)

The collateral consists of 23 floating-rate mortgage loans secured
by 29 mostly transitional real estate properties with a cut-off
date pool balance of approximately $927.9 million, excluding nearly
$92.3 million of future funding commitments that remained
outstanding as of the mortgage loan cut-off date. Most loans are in
a period of transition with plans to stabilize and improve asset
value. During the Permitted Funded Companion Participation
Acquisition Period, the Issuer may acquire Related Funded Companion
Participations subject to, among other criteria, receipt of a
no-downgrade confirmation from DBRS Morningstar (commonly referred
to as a rating agency confirmation (RAC)), except that such
confirmation will not be required with respect to the acquisition
of a participation if the principal balance of the participation
being acquired is less than $1.0 million. The transaction does not
permit the ability to reinvest or add unidentified assets to the
pool postclosing, except that principal proceeds can be used to
acquire the aforementioned Related Funded Companion
Participations.

The loans are generally secured by traditional property types
(i.e., retail, multifamily, and office) with only three loans,
representing 11.1% of the cut-off date pool balance, secured by
nontraditional property types such as hospitality and self-storage.
Additionally, no loans are secured by student-housing properties,
which often exhibit higher cash flow volatility than traditional
multifamily properties. Five loans, representing 27.6% of the
cut-off date pool balance, exhibited either Average + or Above
Average property quality. Additionally, no loans exhibited Average
– or Below Average property quality.

Based on the initial pool balances, the overall weighted-average
(WA) DBRS Morningstar As-Is debt service coverage ratio (DSCR) of
0.74x and WA As-Is loan-to-value ratio (LTV) of 80.1% generally
reflect high-leverage financing. Most of the assets are generally
well positioned to stabilize, and any realized cash flow growth
would help to offset a rise in interest rates and improve the
overall debt yield of the loans. DBRS Morningstar associates its
loss given default (LGD) based on the assets' as-is LTV, which does
not assume that the stabilization plan and cash flow growth will
ever materialize. The DBRS Morningstar As-Is DSCR at issuance does
not consider the sponsor's business plan, as the DBRS Morningstar
As-Is net cash flow (NCF) was generally based on the most recent
annualized period. The sponsor's business plan could have an
immediate impact on the underlying asset performance that the DBRS
Morningstar As-Is NCF is not accounting for. When measured against
the DBRS Morningstar Stabilized NCF, the WA DBRS Morningstar DSCR
is estimated to improve to 1.05x, suggesting that the properties
are likely to have improved NCFs once the sponsor's business plan
has been implemented.

Eleven loans, comprising 54.5% of the cut-off date pool balance,
represent refinancings. The refinancings within this securitization
generally do not require the respective sponsor(s) to contribute
material cash equity as a source of funding in conjunction with the
mortgage loan, resulting in a lower sponsor equity basis in the
underlying collateral. Generally speaking, the refinance loans are
performing at a higher level and have less stabilization to do. Of
the 11 refinance loans, five loans, comprising 42.2% of the
refinancings, reported occupancy rates higher than 80.0%.
Additionally, the 11 refinance loans exhibited a WA growth between
as-is and stabilized appraised value estimates of 11.6% compared
with the overall WA appraised value growth of 17.2% of the pool and
the WA appraised value growth of 23.9% exhibited by the pool's
acquisition loans.

Twenty-three loans, comprising 100.0% of the cut-off date pool
balance, have floating interest rates. All of the aforementioned
loans are IO through the full duration of the initial loan term
(and eight loans comprising 33.4% of the cut-off date pool balance
are IO through the fully extended loan period) with original terms
ranging from 24 to 48 months, creating interest rate risk. All
identified floating-rate loans are short-term loans with maximum
fully extended loan terms of 60 months or less. Additionally, for
all floating-rate loans, DBRS Morningstar used the one-month Libor
index, which is based on the lower of a DBRS Morningstar stressed
rate that corresponded with the remaining fully extended term of
the loans or the strike price of the interest rate cap with the
respective contractual loan spread added to determine a stressed
interest rate over the loan term.

DBRS Morningstar did not conduct interior or exterior tours of the
properties because of health and safety constraints associated with
the ongoing Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic. As a result,
DBRS Morningstar relied more heavily on third-party reports, online
data sources, and information provided by the Issuer to determine
the overall DBRS Morningstar property quality assigned to each
loan. Recent third-party reports were provided for all loans and
contained property quality commentary and photos.

With regard to the pandemic, the magnitude and extent of
performance stress posed to global structured finance transactions
remain highly uncertain. This considers the fiscal and monetary
policy measures and statutory law changes that have already been
implemented or will be implemented to soften the impact of the
crisis on global economies. Some regions, jurisdictions, and asset
classes are, however, affected more immediately. Accordingly, DBRS
Morningstar may apply additional short-term stresses to its rating
analysis, for example by front-loading default expectations and/or
assessing the liquidity position of a structured finance
transaction with more stressful operational risk and/or cash flow
timing considerations.

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



VOYA CLO 2017-1: Moody's Raises Class C Notes Rating From Ba1
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned ratings to three classes of
CLO refinancing notes issued by Voya CLO 2017-1, LTD. (the
"Issuer").

Moody's rating action is as follows:

US$320,000,000 Class A-1-R Floating Rate Notes Due 2030 (the "Class
A-1-R Notes"), Assigned Aaa (sf)

US$60,000,000 Class A-2-R Floating Rate Notes Due 2030 (the "Class
A-2-R Notes"), Assigned Aa1 (sf)

US$32,500,000 Class B-R Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due 2030
(the "Class B-R Notes"), Assigned A2 (sf)

Additionally, Moody's has taken rating action on the following
outstanding notes originally issued by the Issuer on April 12, 2017
(the "Original Closing Date"):

US$27,500,000 Class C Deferrable Floating Rate Notes Due 2030 (the
"Class C Notes"), Upgraded to Baa3 (sf); previously on September
15, 2020 Downgraded to Ba1 (sf)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rationale for the ratings is based on Moody's methodology and
considers all relevant risks particularly those associated with the
CLO's portfolio and structure.

The Issuer is a managed cash flow collateralized loan obligation
(CLO). The issued notes are collateralized primarily by a portfolio
of broadly syndicated senior secured corporate loans.

Voya Alternative Asset Management LLC (the "Manager") will continue
to direct the selection, acquisition and disposition of the assets
on behalf of the Issuer and may engage in trading activity,
including discretionary trading, during the transaction's remaining
reinvestment period.

The Issuer previously issued two other classes of secured notes and
one class of subordinated notes, which will remain outstanding.

In addition to the issuance of the Refinancing Notes, the other
classes of secured notes and additional subordinated notes, a
variety of other changes to transaction features will occur in
connection with the refinancing. These include: extension of the
non-call period; the inclusion of alternative benchmark replacement
provisions; changes to the definition of "Moody's Adjusted Weighted
Average Rating Factor".

Moody's rating actions on the Class C Notes is primarily a result
of the refinancing, which increases excess spread available as
credit enhancement to the rated notes.

Moody's modeled the transaction using a cash flow model based on
the Binomial Expansion Technique, as described in "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations."

The key model inputs Moody's used in its analysis, such as par,
weighted average rating factor, diversity score and weighted
average recovery rate, are based on its published methodology and
could differ from the trustee's reported numbers. For modeling
purposes, Moody's used the following base-case assumptions:

Performing par and principal proceeds balance: $488,522,823

Defaulted par: $1,160,512

Diversity Score: 92

Weighted Average Rating Factor (WARF): 2862

Weighted Average Spread (WAS) (before accounting for LIBOR floors):
3.23%

Weighted Average Recovery Rate (WARR): 48.3%

Weighted Average Life (WAL): 4.7 years

In consideration of the current high uncertainties around the
global economy, and the ultimate performance of the CLO portfolio,
Moody's conducted a number of additional sensitivity analyses
representing a range of outcomes that could diverge, both to the
downside and the upside, from Moody's base case. Some of the
additional scenarios that Moody's considered in its analysis of the
transaction include, among others: additional near-term defaults of
companies facing liquidity pressure; an additional cashflow
analysis assuming a lower WAS to test the sensitivity to LIBOR
floors; sensitivity analysis on deteriorating credit quality due to
a material exposure to loans with negative outlook, and a lower
recovery rate assumption on defaulted assets to reflect declining
loan recovery rate expectations.

The coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on economic
activity. Although global economies have shown a remarkable degree
of resilience to date and are returning to growth, the uneven
effects on individual businesses, sectors and regions will continue
throughout 2021 and will endure as a challenge to the world's
economies well beyond the end of the year. While persistent virus
fears remain the main risk for a recovery in demand, the economy
will recover faster if vaccines and further fiscal and monetary
policy responses bring forward a normalization of activity. As a
result, there is a heightened degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts. Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the
performance of corporate assets from a gradual and unbalanced
recovery in the US economic activity.

Moody's regard the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under
Moody's ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety.

Methodology Underlying the Rating Action:

The principal methodology used in these ratings was "Moody's Global
Approach to Rating Collateralized Loan Obligations" published in
December 2020.

Factors That Would Lead to an Upgrade or Downgrade of the Ratings:

The performance of the rated notes is subject to uncertainty. The
performance of the rated notes is sensitive to the performance of
the underlying portfolio, which in turn depends on economic and
credit conditions that may change. The Manager's investment
decisions and management of the transaction will also affect the
performance of the rated notes.


WELLFLEET CLO X: S&P Assigns B- Rating on $5.550MM Class E Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its ratings to Wellfleet CLO X
Ltd./Wellfleet CLO X LLC's floating-rate notes.

The note issuance is a CLO securitization governed by investment
criteria and backed primarily by broadly syndicated
speculative-grade (rated 'BB+' or lower) senior secured term loans.
The transaction is managed by Wellfleet Credit Partners LLC, a
subsidiary of Littlejohn & Co.

The ratings reflect:

-- The diversification of the collateral pool;

-- The credit enhancement provided through the subordination of
cash flows, excess spread, and overcollateralization;

-- The experience of the collateral management team, which can
affect the performance of the rated notes through collateral
selection, ongoing portfolio management, and trading; and

-- The transaction's legal structure, which is expected to be
bankruptcy remote.

  Ratings Assigned

  Wellfleet CLO X Ltd./Wellfleet CLO X LLC

  Class X, $3.750 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-1-R, $232.500 million: AAA (sf)
  Class A-2-R, $52.500 million: AA (sf),
  Class B-R (deferrable), $22.500 million: A (sf)
  Class C-R (deferrable), $20.625 million: BBB- (sf)
  Class D-R (deferrable), $14.063 million: BB- (sf)
  Class E (deferrable), $5.550 million: B- (sf)
  Subordinated notes, $28.120 million: Not rated



WELLS FARGO 2019-1: S&P Affirms 'BB-(sf)' Class B-4 Certs Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings reviewed its rating on the class B-4
certificates issued from Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities
2019-1 (WFMBS 2019-1) due to reported interest shortfalls. S&P
affirmed its 'BB- (sf)' rating on the class B-4 certificates after
receiving a revised April 2021 distribution report from the
securities administrator, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. The revised April
2021 distribution report showed a decrease to the remaining unpaid
interest shortfall amount on the class B-4 certificates.

Rating Actions

The class B-4 certificates issued from WFMBS 2019-1 had its first
reported interest shortfall during the August 2020 remittance
report and continued to report interest shortfalls through the
April 2021 remittance period (nine periods). Based on S&P's "S&P
Global Ratings Definitions," published Jan. 5, 2021, an outstanding
interest shortfall for a duration of nine periods is consistent
with a maximum potential rating of 'BBB- (sf)'.

On May 14, 2021, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., as servicer to the
transaction, revised and restated certain modification reporting
occurring between the August 2020 and April 2021 distribution
dates. As a result, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., in its capacity as
securities administrator, has restated the distributions in
accordance with Depository Trust & Clearing Corp.'s policy and
intends to make future adjustments to incorporate the historic
impact of those affected distributions.

The restatement and redistribution of funds caused the outstanding
interest shortfall on the class B-4 certificates to decrease from
$72,067 to $271, which we believe to be a de minimis amount.

S&P said, "We believe that the remaining interest shortfall amount
on the class B-4 certificates will be fully reimbursed next month
and are unlikely to occur going forward as Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
has updated their modification reporting to conform to the related
transaction documents.

"As part of our surveillance review process, we will continue to
monitor the speed at which the interest shortfall amounts are being
reimbursed, as well as the transaction's overall credit quality."

Analytical Considerations

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."



WORLDWIDE PLAZA 2017-WWP: DBRS Confirms BB Rating on Class F Certs
------------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS, Inc. confirmed its ratings on all classes of the Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2017-WWP issued by
Worldwide Plaza Trust 2017-WWP:

-- Class A at AAA (sf)
-- Class X-A at AAA (sf)
-- Class B at AA (high) (sf)
-- Class C at A (high) (sf)
-- Class D at BBB (high) (sf)
-- Class E at BBB (low) (sf)
-- Class F at BB (sf)

All trends are Stable.

The rating confirmations reflect the overall stable performance of
the transaction, which remains in line with DBRS Morningstar's
expectations. The transaction consists of a $705.0 million
participation in a $940.0 million first-lien, whole mortgage loan
secured by a Class A office property in Manhattan. In addition to
the first-lien mortgage, there is $260.0 million of mezzanine debt
held outside the trust. The 10-year trust loan matures in November
2027 and is sponsored by a joint venture between SL Green and RXR
Realty LLC.

The property totals 1.8 million square feet (sf) and occupies an
entire block between 49th Street and 50th Street at 825 Eighth
Avenue in New York City's Time Square/West Side submarket. The
property also includes 10,592 sf of ground-level retail, and the C
and E subway lines are accessible via a station beneath the
building. The two largest tenants, Nomura Holding America, Inc.
(Nomura) and Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (Cravath), collectively
account for 68.9% of net rentable area (NRA). Nomura, representing
38% of NRA, uses the space at the property as its North American
headquarters. Nomura is an investment-grade tenant and has a lease
expiry in September 2033, but the leases also contain a contraction
option for up to 10.0% of its total NRA for the five-year period
commencing in February 2022 and a one-time termination right for
all of its space in January 2027, following an 18-month notice
period. Cravath, representing 26.8% of NRA, also uses the space for
its headquarters and leases the highest floors at the property.
Cravath's current lease expires in August 2024, and the tenant
confirmed in October 2019 that it plans to relocate its
headquarters to Two Manhattan West in 2024. Furthermore, Cravath's
contractual rental rate of $95.00 per square foot (psf) is
significantly higher than the Midtown West submarket's asking rents
of $72.52 psf according to Reis, which will likely have an adverse
effect on cash flow. Mitigating these concerns is the amount of
space that Cravath is subleasing to notable tenants including
McCarter & English, LLP, Heritage Realty LLC, and AMA Consulting
Engineers, P.C. In addition, the loan has a Cravath rollover
reserve account, which will begin sweeping cash on August 31, 2023,
until the aggregate amount deposited equals $42.4 million, equal to
$76.96 psf.

As of the most recent financial reporting ending YE2020, the
property was 97% occupied with a debt service coverage ratio of
2.09x

Notes: All figures are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.



[*] S&P Takes Various Actions on 127 Classes from 20 US RMBS Deals
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings completed its review of 127 ratings from 20 U.S.
RMBS transactions issued between 2003 and 2013. The review yielded
22 downgrades, 30 affirmations, 69 withdrawals, and six
discontinuances.

A list of Affected Ratings can be viewed at:

            https://bit.ly/2Sh69MU

Analytical Considerations

S&P said, "We incorporate various considerations into our decisions
to raise, lower, or affirm ratings when reviewing the indicative
ratings suggested by our projected cash flows. These considerations
are based on transaction-specific performance or structural
characteristics (or both) and their potential effects on certain
classes." Some of these considerations may include:

-- Factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic,
-- Collateral performance or delinquency trends,
-- Erosion of credit support,
-- A small loan count, and
-- Historical interest shortfalls.

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

Rating Actions

S&P said, "The rating changes reflect our view of the associated
transaction-specific collateral performance or structural
characteristics and/or reflect the application of specific criteria
applicable to these classes. See the ratings list below for the
specific rationales associated with each of the classes with rating
transitions.

"The ratings affirmations reflect our view that our projected
credit support and collateral performance on these classes has
remained relatively consistent with our prior projections."



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***