/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/210519.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, May 19, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 138

                            Headlines

2408 W KENNEDY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
ABRAXAS PETROLEUM: Angelo Gordon Delivers Restructuring Proposal
AGF MACHINERY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for June 24
ALLIED INJURY: Court OKs Disclosures, July 20 Plan Hearing
AMERICAN ROCK: Moody's Rates New $470MM First Lien Term Loan 'B2'

ANGLO-DUTCH ENERGY: Seeks Approval to Hire Okin Adams as Counsel
ANTERO MIDSTREAM: Moody's Upgrades CFR to Ba3, Outlook Stable
ANTERO RESOURCES: Moody's Raises CFR to Ba3, Outlook Stable
APPCITYLIFE: Files for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Protection
ASTRA ACQUISITION: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable

ATKORE INC: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on New $400MM Unsec. Notes
AVANTOR FUNDING: Moody's Rates New $1.1BB Incremental Loan 'Ba1'
BCR PARTNERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
BEP ULTERRA: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'B3' CFR to Stable
BLINK CHARGING: Incurs $7.4 Million Net Loss in First Quarter

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: Considers Its Ch. 11 Plan as The Best Option
BOY SCOUTS: Roman Catholic Archbishop Opposes Disclosure Statement
BRECKENRIDGE HILLS: Gets Interim OK to Hire L.K. Wood as Broker
BRECKENRIDGE HILLS: Gets Interim OK to Hire Legal Counsel
CANTERA COURT: Taps Pulman Cappuccio & Pullen as Legal Counsel

CASTEX ENERGY: Committee Taps Seaport Global as Financial Advisor
CLEAN ENERGY: Posts $1.1 Million Net Profit in First Quarter
CLEVELAND BIOLABS: Incurs $547,205 Net Loss in First Quarter
COLORADO HEALTH: U.S. Govt.'s Bid to 'Leafrog' Creditors Fails
COMMUNITY CARE: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable

COMMUNITY INTERVENTION: Plan to Pay 10% to 20% for Unsecureds
CYPRUS MINES: Tort Claimants Cannot Alter Ch.11 Committee Makeup
DT MIDSTREAM: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
DT MIDSTREAM: Moody's Assigns First Time 'Ba1' Corp Family Rating
EASTERDAYS FARMS: Sued for Loan Default on Potato,Onion Facilities

ELECTROMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES: Incurs $2.6M Net Loss in 1st Quarter
ENCORE CAPITAL: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'Ba2' CFR to Positive
ENERGY TRANSFER: Moody's Affirms Ba2 Preferred Stock Rating
ESCALON MEDICAL: Incurs $137,465 Net Loss in Third Quarter
FECK PROPERTIES: Martell Buying Englewood Property for $3.7-Mil.

FLOAT HORIZEN: Wins Cash Collateral Access
FLUOR CORP: Equity Proceeds Use No Impact on Moody's Ba1 CFR
FOSSIL GROUP: Incurs $24.4 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
G.A.F. SEELIG: Court OKs 2nd Amended Plan, Plan Administrator Named
GDC TECHNICS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee

GEO GROUP: Lenders Prepare for Debt Talks With Prison Operator
GNIRBES INC: Disclosure Statement Hearing Slated for June 2
GOODYEAR TIRE: Fitch Rates New $1.45-Bil. Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
GOODYEAR TIRE: Moody's Rates New $1.45BB Unsecured Notes 'B2'
GREEN DOT: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on $7MM 2011A Revenue Bonds

GROWLIFE INC: Receives Second Default Notice From Lender
GRUPO AEROMEXICO: Asks Court to Reject December 2020 Ch.11 Deal
HEARTLAND DENTAL: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR on American Dental Deal
HOYA MIDCO: Moody's Puts B3 CFR Under Review for Upgrade
HUMANIGEN INC: Incurs $65.6 Million Net Loss in First Quarter

HYSTER-YALE GROUP: Moody's Rates New $225MM First Lien Loan 'B1'
IDEANOMICS INC: To Acquire US Hybrid for $50M
IMERYS TALC AMERICA:Asks Court Okay to Carry Out Ch.11 Acquisitions
INTEGRATED VENTURES: Incurs $16.6-Mil. Net Loss in Third Quarter
JAGUAR HEALTH: Adjourns Annual Meeting to June 11

JAMES B. THOMAS: Public Access to Ex. A of Sale Motion Restricted
JBS USA: Moody's Rates New $500MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'Ba1'
JET REAL ESTATE: $1.6M Sale of Del Mar Property to Zambon Approved
JOSEPH M. THOMAS: Pehrssons Buying Erie City Properties for $1.05M
KINTARA THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $6.6-Mil. Net Loss in Third Quarter

LATAM BRASIL: Outsources Ground Agents as Restructuring Continues
LEONARD R. COSTANTINI, III: Northwest Buying Rose Ridge for $1.35M
MATCH GROUP: Moody's Rates New $400MM Incremental Term Loan 'Ba1'
MAXIMUS INC: Moody's Assigns First Time 'Ba2' Corp Family Rating
MCGEHEE PARK: Plan Confirmation Hearing Slated for June 24

MERION INC: Incurs $297,640 Net Loss in First Quarter
MIAMI JEWISH: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on $44MM Series 2017 Bonds
MICHAEL FELICE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for June 24
MOHEGAN TRIBAL: Incurs $16 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
NASHEF LLC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru July

NEUBASE THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $5.5-Mil. Net Loss in Second Quarter
NN INC: Signs Cooperation Agreement With Corre, Adds New Director
NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS: Signs Deal to Sell $4-Mil. Common Shares
OMNIQ CORP: Posts $3.3 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
OUTLOOK THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $13.1 Million Net Loss in 2nd Quarter

PHUNWARE INC: Incurs $12.4 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
PIAGGIO AMERICA: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PRECIPIO INC: Incurs $1.5 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
QUALITY REIMBURSEMENT: Plan Confirmed, Bid for Ch.11 Trustee Nixed
RISING TIDE: Moody's Assigns First Time 'B3' Corp. Family Rating

RITE AID: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'Caa1' CFR to Positive
ROCKET SOFTWARE: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Following ASG Acquisition
ROLLING HILLS: Wins Cash Collateral Access
ROYALE ENERGY: Incurs $572K Net Loss in First Quarter
SAFE FLEET: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable

SC SJ HOLDINGS: Fairmont San Jose's Bankruptcy Plan on Ice
SEADRILL LTD: Forbearance Agreement Extended to May 28, 2021
SEADRILL PARNTERS: Court Approves Debt-for-Equity Plan
SHRI NARAYAN: Seeks to Hire 'Ordinary Course' Professionals
SQUARE INC: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Stable

STAR US BIDCO: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Positive
STREAM TV: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Case as Bad-Faith Filing
SYNRGO INC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TECT AEROSPACE: May 25 Hearing on Bid Procedures for Everett Assets
TENTLOGIX INC: Proposed Private Sales of Goods and ACUs Approved

TOPP'S MECHANICAL: D & K Agri Buying 2004 Grove Crane for $200K
TRANQUILITY GROUP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
TRANS-LUX CORP: Incurs $621K Net Loss in First Quarter
TRIUMPH HOUSING: Unsecureds to Share Funds After $25K Suit Reserve
URBAN ONE: Posts $7K Net Income in First Quarter

VICTORY CAPITAL: Moody's Upgrades CFR to Ba2, Outlook Stable
VOYAGER AVIATION: Moody's Withdraws Caa1 CFR on Restructuring
WEATHERFORD INT'L: Fends Off Investor Lawsuit Over Bankruptcy
WEINSTEIN CO: Trustee Seeks to Toss Plan Appeal of Claimants
WHITE STALLION ENERGY: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru June 30

YOAKUM INDEPENDENT SCHOOL: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Issuer Default Rating
YPF ENERGIA: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'Caa3' CFR to Stable
ZEIGANGEL VENTURES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
[*] Hawaii Monthly Bankruptcies Increased for First Time in 2021
[*] Restaurants, Bars Face Possible Shutout From New Relief Fund


                            *********

2408 W KENNEDY: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 2408 W Kennedy LLC
          DBA The Kennedy
        2408 W Kennedy Blvd
        Tampa, Fl 33609

Business Description: 2408 W Kennedy owns and operates
                      nightclubs in Tampa, Florida.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 18, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 21-02578

Debtor's Counsel: W. Bart Meacham, Esq.
                  W. BART MEACHAM, ESQUIRE
                  308 E. Plymouth St.
                  Tampa, FL 33603
                  Tel: 813-223-6334
                  E-mail: wbartmeacham@yahoo.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Christopher Scott, managing member.

The Debtor did not file a list of its 20 largest unsecured
creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/S63ALCI/2408_W_Kennedy_LLC__flmbke-21-02578__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ABRAXAS PETROLEUM: Angelo Gordon Delivers Restructuring Proposal
----------------------------------------------------------------
Luzi Ann Javier of Bloomberg News reports that Angelo Gordon Energy
Servicer, known as AGES, delivered a proposal for a pre-arranged
reorganization of Abraxas Petroleum under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code.

Angelo Gordon reported a 16.6% stake in Abraxas.

The proposed restructuring would involve converting the total
claims under the Second Lien Facility, including accrued and unpaid
interest into 100% of the equity of the reorganized Issuer, subject
to dilution by warrants.  It also provides for restructuring and
extending the maturity of the outstanding obligations under the
First Lien Facility and hedge termination obligations.

                   About Abraxas Petroleum Corp.

San Antonio, TX-based Abraxas Petroleum Corporation --
http://www.abraxaspetroleum.com/-- is an independent energy
company primarily engaged in the acquisition, exploration,
development and production of oil and gas.


AGF MACHINERY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for June 24
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge William R. Sawyer has set for June 24, 2021, at 10 a.m., by
telephone, the hearing to approve the Disclosure Statement
explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of AGF Machinery, LLC.  

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3bzWgki from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                      About AGF Machinery

AGF Machinery, LLC -- https://agfmachinery.com/ -- is engaged in
selling and renting construction equipment, aerial work platforms
and heavy-duty equipment. The company offers a full line of
construction equipment in its sales and rental inventories from
Wacker Neuson, ASV, Skyjack, Toro, and Husqvarna.

AGF Machinery filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Ala. Case
No. 20-11029) on August 12, 2020. The petition was signed by
Jeffrey Lee Washington, a member. Debtor disclosed $10 million to
$50 million in both assets and liabilities at the time of the
filing.

Judge William R. Sawyer oversees the case.

The Debtor has tapped Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., as
its bankruptcy counsel, and Saltmarsh, Cleaveland & Gund as its
financial advisor.


ALLIED INJURY: Court OKs Disclosures, July 20 Plan Hearing
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mark Houle approved the revised Disclosure Statement
accompanying the Liquidation Plan of Allied Injury Management,
Inc., filed by David M. Goodrich, the Debtor's Chapter 11 Trustee.

Judge Houle fixed certain dates with respect to voting on the Plan
and its confirmation:

   * June 4, 2021, as the deadline for creditors to return
ballots;

   * June 18, 2021, as the deadline for filing the Trustee's ballot
analysis and confirmation brief;

   * July 2, 2021, as the deadline for filing objections to Plan
confirmation;

   * July 9, 2021, as the deadline for filing replies to Plan
objections; and

   * July 20, 2021, at 1 p.m., as the confirmation hearing on the
Plan.

A copy of the order is available for free at https://bit.ly/3bxasLb
from PacerMonitor.com.

                      About Allied Injury

Headquartered in San Bernardino, California, Allied Injury
Management, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-14273) on May 11, 2016, estimating
assets between $10 million and $50 million and debts between $1
million and $10 million.  The petition was signed by John R.
Larson, M.D., president.  Judge Mark D. Houle presides over the
case.

Alan W. Forsley, Esq., and Marc Liberman, Esq., at Fredman
Lieberman Pearl LLP, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The
Debtor hired Michael Blue, Esq., at the Blue Law Group, Inc., as
special litigation counsel and Grobstein Teeple LLP as accountant.

The U.S. Trustee sought and obtained the Court's approval of the
appointment of David M. Goodrich as Chapter 11 Trustee.  The
Chapter 11 trustee retains Mark S. Horoupian at the law firm of
SulmeyerKupetz as his general bankruptcy counsel.


AMERICAN ROCK: Moody's Rates New $470MM First Lien Term Loan 'B2'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 rating to American Rock
Salt Company LLC's ("ARS") new $470 million first lien term loan
and a Caa1 rating to the new $100 million second lien term loan. At
the same time, Moody's affirmed the B2 Corporate Family Rating and
the B2-PD probability of default rating. The rating for the
existing first lien term loan will be withdrawn upon repayment. The
ratings outlook is negative.

"The change in the outlook to negative reflects the company's
decision to pursue a debt- financed recapitalization, in part, to
make a significant distribution to shareholders with the resulting
increase in leverage materially constraining its ability to
maintain a credit profile appropriate for the B2 rating during mild
winters," said Botir Sharipov, Vice President and lead analyst for
American Rock Salt.

Assignments:

Issuer: American Rock Salt Company LLC

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term loan, Assigned Caa1 (LGD6)

Affirmations:

Issuer: American Rock Salt Company LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: American Rock Salt Company LLC

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The rating affirmation reflects the company's continued and
successful efforts to improve operating performance, increase
productivity and efficiency, which along with higher average
selling prices, have led to margin expansion and improved
profitability over the last few years notwithstanding a challenging
calendar year 2020. The B2 CFR reflects ARS's limited scale with a
single mine, lack of business diversity and weather-dependent
business model that results in volatile credit metrics and cash
flow generation. The rating is supported by the company's sector
leading operating margins, highly variable cost structure,
typically strong cash flow from operations and low capital
expenditures partially offset by a dividend policy that has
historically led to significant shareholder distributions. Factors
that further support the rating are high barriers to entry in rock
salt mining industry and cost advantages in the company's primary
markets in western and central New York and Pennsylvania due to
favorable access to truck and rail transportation, as well as
operating one of the lowest cost and the newest salt mines in the
United States. The rating also reflects ARS's adequate liquidity
and expectations that the owners would support the company during
periods of exceptionally weak snowfall (e.g. two or more
consecutive warm winters).

As a part of transaction, ARS will transfer and consolidate NOMI
Holder LLC and other related entities, previously owned by the
holding company, into the borrower group at the OpCo level,
eliminating rent payments and royalties historically paid by ARS,
increasing collateral and providing a small uplift to EBITDA. While
ARS paid down a significant portion of debt since the last dividend
recapitalization in 2011, the proposed $203 million distribution to
the holding company funded by new debt and $40 million in balance
sheet cash will increase its debt and materially reduce the
financial flexibility required to withstand potentially high
variability in winter conditions.

A mild 2019-2020 winter not only led to a drop in deicing volumes
in FY2020, but also left municipal customers with elevated
inventories, reducing solicited volumes and prices during the last
bidding season. Customers' elevated inventory levels and a light
start to the 2020-2021 winter led to a 35% y-o-y decline in tonnage
sold in the December quarter, causing leverage to rise to 6.9x for
LTM December 2020 from 3.7x for LTM December 2019. While January
weather was near average, February's substantial and frequent
snowfall and consistently below freezing temperatures have likely
reduced government and commercial customer inventories, and have
resulted in a significant increase in tonnage sold and revenues
during the March quarter. YTD for FY 2021, ARS tonnage sold has
increased 6.6% y-o-y, resulting in EBITDA increasing in the March
2021 period and leverage declining as compared to the LTM December
2020 period.

Moody's estimates that ARS's leverage in FY2021 (September
year-end) will remain in the range of 6.5-7x. Assuming average
2021-2022 winter conditions and that ARS will use the majority of
anticipated free cash flow for debt repayment, Moody's expects
adjusted debt/EBITDA to decline to 6-6.5x by the end of FY2022.
However, should the markets the company serves experience
below-average winter conditions, leverage could be well in excess
of 7.5x in FY2022, which is above the current downgrade trigger.
The company is expected to remain modestly free cash flow positive
during mild winters.

The negative outlook reflects the company's decision to pursue a
debt-financed recapitalization with the resulting increase in
leverage elevating the risk that during mild winters, leverage
could exceed 7.5x and that ARS might not be able to maintain a
credit profile appropriate for the B2 rating.

By the nature of its business, i.e. deriving nearly 100% of its
revenues from underground mining of rock salt deposits, American
Rock Salt faces a number of ESG risks typical for a company in the
mining industry including compliance with stringent health, safety
and environmental regulations. The company is subject to many and
varied environmental laws and regulations in the areas where it
operates. However, the ESG risks for ARS are generally lower than
those of base and precious metals producers because salt mining is
considered less hazardous and requires less processing (crushing
and grinding). The company needs to maintain social relationships
with the community surrounding its mine. The governance risk is
above average given the company's private ownership has shown to
support an aggressive dividend policy with a significant amount of
cash flows that had historically been distributed to shareholders.

American Rock Salt is expected to have adequate liquidity for at
least the next 12 months. Moody's anticipate positive free cash
flow on an annual basis but expect significant quarterly variation
due to the seasonality of the salt business and need to build up
inventories in advance of the selling season. The company builds
cash on the balance sheet in the first and second fiscal quarters
(fourth and first calendar quarters) as it collects accounts
receivable from the snow season and uses most of its cash in the
third and fourth fiscal quarters. Moody's expect the company will
rely on the new $70 million asset-based revolving credit facility
(unrated) to fund inventory build before collecting significant
cash in the first calendar quarter of the year. On a pro forma
transaction basis, ARS is expected to have $37 million in cash and
cash equivalents. As of March 31, 2021, ARS had nothing drawn under
the revolving credit facility. The new revolver is subject to
borrowing base and will expire in 2026. The revolver commitment
steps down to $35 million from March to August each year and
contains a springing fixed charge coverage ratio test of 1.1x if
revolver excess availability is less than 10% of the borrowing
base. Moody's do not expect the covenant will be triggered over the
next four quarters.

The senior secured first lien term loan due 2028 is rated B2, on
par with the B2 CFR, reflecting its large proportion of the overall
debt. It has a first priority lien on all fixed domestic assets,
salt reserves and minerals rights. The senior secured second lien
term loan due 2029 is rated Caa1, reflecting its subordinate
position in the capital structure relative to the $470 million
first lien term loan and the $70 million asset-based revolver
(unrated) due 2026 that has a first priority lien on current
assets. The term loans is guaranteed by all material domestic
subsidiaries of the borrower American Rock Salt Company LLC,
including the new entities brought into the borrower group.

As proposed, the new credit facilities are expected to provide the
borrower with covenant flexibility that could adversely affect
creditors. Notable terms include:

1) Incremental debt capacity up to the sum of the greater of $100
million and 100% of four-quarter, pro forma EBITDA, plus an
unlimited amount not exceeding 5.0x First Lien Leverage Ratio (for
pari passu basis secured debt). No portion of the incremental may
be incurred with an earlier maturity than the initial term loans
and the incremental debt is subject to MFN pricing protections; 2)
The credit agreement will permit the transfer of assets to
unrestricted subsidiaries, up to the carve-out capacity, and
subject as well to "blocker" provisions which prohibit the transfer
of any intellectual property that is material to the operation of
the company or its restricted subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to
unrestricted subsidiaries; 3) Dividends or transfers resulting in
partial ownership of subsidiary guarantors could jeopardize
guarantees subject to protective provisions which will only permit
guarantee releases if they are in connection with a bona fide,
legitimate business purpose of the company and not for the primary
purpose of effecting a release from such guarantee to evade
creditors; 4) The credit agreement will provide some limitations on
up-tiering transactions, including the requirement that each lender
consents to amendments to subordinate the liens securing the first
lien credit facilities attaching to all or substantially all of the
collateral to any other material indebtedness for borrowed money.
The above are proposed terms and the final terms of the credit
agreement may be materially different.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's see limited upside to the company's ratings due to its
current business profile (operating a single mine), modest size and
high leverage post the proposed dividend recapitalization
transaction. However, quantitatively, Moody's would consider an
upgrade if the company pays down debt so that in mild (trough)
winter conditions leverage does not exceed 4x, the company
maintains good liquidity and a conservative financial policy (i.e.
does not continually dividend out excess cash or lever up to take
advantage of improved earnings).

Moody's could downgrade the ratings if leverage is expected to
exceed 7.5x, interest coverage to fall below 2x and sustained
liquidity (cash and revolver availability) to decline below $30
million. Moody's could also downgrade the ratings if the company
undertakes a large debt-financed acquisition, does not reduce
indebtedness or makes a significant distribution that will further
constrain its ability to maintain a credit profile appropriate for
the B2 rating through mild winters.

American Rock Salt Company LLC produces highway deicing rock salt.
The company operates a single mine in upstate New York and sells
primarily to state and local government agencies in the
northeastern United States. The firm is a wholly owned subsidiary
of American Rock Salt Holdings LLC, which is closely held by
private investors including some members of management. The company
does not publicly disclose its financial statements. Headquartered
in Retsof, NY, American Rock Salt generated approximately $220
million in revenue for the twelve months ended March 31, 2021.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Chemical
Industry published in March 2019.


ANGLO-DUTCH ENERGY: Seeks Approval to Hire Okin Adams as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Anglo-Dutch Energy, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ Okin Adams, LLP
as legal counsel.

Okin Adams will render these legal services:

     (a) advise the Debtor regarding its rights, duties and powers
in its Chapter 11 case;

     (b) assist the Debtor in its consultations relative to the
administration of the case;

     (c) assist the Debtor in analyzing the claims of creditors and
in negotiating with such creditors;

     (d) assist the Debtor in the analysis of and negotiations with
any third party concerning reorganization matters;

     (e) represent the Debtor at all hearings and other
proceedings;

     (f) review and analyze all applications, orders, statements of
operations and schedules filed with the court and advise the Debtor
as to their propriety;

     (g) assist the Debtor in preparing pleadings and applications;
and

     (h) perform such other legal services as may be required.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Timothy L. Wentworth   $450 per hour
     Christopher Adams      $500 per hour
     Legal Assistants       $135 per hour

As of the petition date, Okin Adams was not owed any fees and
expenses by the Debtor and $130,039 of the retainer remained in the
client trust account.

Timothy Wentworth, Esq., at Okin Adams, disclosed in court filings
that his firm is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined
in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

      Timothy L. Wentworth, Esq.
      Okin Adams LLP
      1113 Vine St., Suite 240
      Houston, TX 77002
      Tel: (713) 228-4100
      Email: twentworth@okinadams.com

                      About Anglo-Dutch Energy

Anglo-Dutch Energy, LLC -- http://www.anglo-dutch.com-- is an
operator focused on exploration, acquisitions, and development in
the United States.  Its acquisitions team is experienced in
acquiring low-risk production life oil and gas reserves throughout
the Upper Gulf Coast, Permian Basin and Mid-Continent.

Anglo-Dutch Energy filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No.
21-60036) on April 23, 2021.  Scott V. Van Dyke, member and
president, signed the petition.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor disclosed assets of up to $50 million and liabilities of up
to $10 million. Judge Christopher M. Lopez oversees the case.
Timothy L. Wentworth, Esq., at Okin Adams LLP, serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


ANTERO MIDSTREAM: Moody's Upgrades CFR to Ba3, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Antero Midstream Partners LP's
(AM) Corporate Family Rating to Ba3 from B1, Probability of Default
Rating to Ba3-PD from B1-PD, and senior unsecured notes to B1 from
B2. The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating was unchanged at SGL-3.
The rating outlook remains stable.

"The upgrade reflects AM's recent decision to cut shareholder
distributions and reduce debt, as well as the significant
improvements in the credit profile of AM's principal customer
Antero Resources Corporation, which improves visibility around AM's
future throughput volumes and cash flow," said Sajjad Alam, Moody's
Senior Analyst.

Issuer: Antero Midstream Partners LP

Ratings Upgraded:

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to Ba3 from B1

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to Ba3-PD from B1-PD

Senior Unsecured Notes, Upgraded to B1 (LGD5) from B2 (LGD5)

Ratings Unchanged:

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Remains Unchanged at SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Antero Midstream's Ba3 CFR reflects its heavy reliance on Antero
Resources, concentrated geographic focus in the Appalachian Basin,
and indirect exposure to highly volatile natural gas and natural
gas liquids (NGLs) prices. AM's primary counter-party Antero
Resources is trying to operate with lower costs, generate free cash
flow, reduce debt and push out significant debt maturities.
Consequently, any material changes to Antero Resources' credit
profile will likely have a direct impact on Antero Midstream's
ratings. AM's CFR is supported by its substantial scale, moderate
financial leverage, adequate distribution coverage and
predominantly fee-based revenue stream from Antero Resources. AM
will continue to distribute a significant portion of its operating
cash flow leaving only a limited amount for reinvestment.

Antero Midstream's unsecured notes are rated B1, one notch below
the Ba3 CFR given the significant size of the company's secured
credit facility in the capital structure that has a priority claim
to AM's assets.

The SGL-3 rating reflects Moody's view that AM will maintain
adequate liquidity through 2022. AM had roughly $1.5 billion of
availability under its $2.13 billion revolving credit facility as
of March 31, 2021 and Moody's don't expect any meaningful increase
in revolver borrowings through 2022. The revolver expires on
October 26, 2022, and Moody's expects AM to remain in compliance
with the revolver financial covenants. The partnership has limited
alternate liquidity given its assets are encumbered.

Antero Midstream's stable rating outlook is consistent with the
rating outlook of Antero Resources.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade of AM's ratings would depend on Antero Resources
Corporation ratings being upgraded. Moody's would also expect
debt/EBITDA to remain near 3x and distribution coverage to be
sustained above 1.1x. The CFR could be downgraded if Antero
Resources' CFR is downgraded, or if AM's leverage metric rises
above 4x.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Midstream
Energy published in December 2018.

Antero Midstream Partners LP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Antero
Midstream Corporation, a midstream energy company based in Denver,
Colorado. Antero Midstream Corporation owns and operates an
integrated system of natural gas gathering pipelines, compression
stations, processing and fractionation plants, and water handling
and treatment assets in northwest West Virginia and southern Ohio.


ANTERO RESOURCES: Moody's Raises CFR to Ba3, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Antero Resources Corporation's
Corporate Family Rating to Ba3 from B1, Probability of Default
Rating to Ba3-PD from B1-PD, and senior unsecured notes to B1 from
B2. The SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating was unchanged. The
rating outlook remains stable.

"The upgrade reflects Antero's meaningful debt reduction in
early-2021, and our expectation that the company will achieve
additional debt reduction through 2022 by generating free cash flow
more consistently," commented Sajjad Alam, Moody's Senior Analyst.


"Higher natural gas and NGLs prices, management's heightened focus
on maintaining capital discipline, as well as the company's
significant hedge book provide good free cash flow visibility and a
reasonable path towards further deleveraging."

Ratings Upgraded:

Issuer: Antero Resources Corporation

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to Ba3 from B1

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to Ba3-PD from B1-PD

Senior Unsecured Notes, Upgraded to B1 (LGD5) from B2 (LGD5)

Ratings Unchanged:

Issuer: Antero Resources Corporation

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Unchanged at SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Antero Resources Corporation

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Antero's Ba3 CFR reflects its improving but high financial leverage
on a consolidated basis (for Antero Midstream), exposure to
volatile natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs) prices,
geographic concentration in Appalachia, and significant undeveloped
reserves and shale focused operations. While Antero's diversified
firm-transportation (FT) pipeline contracts have historically
helped realize higher prices, the company pays high tariff rates
and has a higher overall midstream cost structure than its
Appalachian peers. The credit profile is supported by Antero's
large natural gas production and reserves in Appalachia,
significant natural gas liquids (-30%) in the production mix,
consistent long-term hedging philosophy that reduces risk and
improves cash flow visibility, reduced operating and development
costs, and significant ownership of Antero Midstream Corporation,
which could be a source of alternate liquidity.

Antero should have good liquidity through 2022, which is reflected
in the SGL-2 rating. Moody's expects significant free cash flow
generation through 2022 enabling Antero to reduce debt by an
additional $200-$400 million and fully extinguish revolver
drawings. Antero will not have any notes maturity until 2025
assuming a full redemption of the 2023 notes after the company's
recent decision to call those bonds. Antero had $1.76 billion in
available borrowing capacity as of March 31, 2021 after accounting
for $742 million of LC outstanding. The borrowing base under the
credit facility was $2.85 billion and lender commitments were $2.64
billion at March 31. The borrowing base was re-affirmed in the
semi-annual redetermination in April 2021. Antero's revolver will
mature the earlier of: (i) October 26, 2022, and (ii) the date that
is 91 days to the earliest stated redemption of any series of
Antero's senior notes, unless such series of notes is refinanced.
Moody's expects Antero to extend the maturity in 2021 to maintain a
good liquidity cushion.

Antero's senior unsecured notes are rated B1, below the Ba3 CFR
because of the significant size of the secured credit facility,
which has a first-lien priority claim to substantially all of
Antero's assets. The unsecured notes have upstream guarantees from
substantially all of Antero's E&P subsidiaries that also guarantee
the secured revolving credit facility.

Antero's stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation of
continued deleveraging and significant free cash flow generation
through 2022.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade would be contingent on Antero's ability to produce free
cash flow on a consistent basis, maintain capital efficiency and
achieve material debt reduction. More specifically, an upgrade
could be considered if the company can sustain the leveraged
full-cycle ratio (LFCR) above 1.5x and maintain a retained cash
flow to debt ratio above 30% on a consolidated basis. Antero's
ratings could be downgraded if retained cash flow to debt remains
below 20%, the LFCR approaches 1x, or the company generates
recurring or substantial negative free cash flow.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.

Antero Resources Corporation is a leading natural gas and natural
gas liquids producer in the Marcellus and Utica Shales in West
Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania.


APPCITYLIFE: Files for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Protection
------------------------------------------------------
Collin Krabbe of Albuquerque Business First reports that
APPCityLife, an Albuquerque tech company that created tech tools
for citizens of Albuquerque, plans to liquidate.

The company, founded in 2009, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy
protection in the second week of May 2021.  It listed between $0
and $50,000 in estimated assets, according to the petition filed in
New Mexico Bankruptcy Court.

The company reported $588,028 in liabilities. The largest unsecured
creditor listed in the filing is Bryan and Patricia Bingham with a
claim amount of $271,000.

Also included among the unsecured creditors are the IRS, owed
$74,551, and the Bank of Oklahoma, owed $19,600.

APPCityLife has been a longstanding member of the Albuquerque
startup scene, and has made an impact on the community. It has
developed mobile applications that could help citizens more easily
use municipal services. In 2018, the city unveiled the company's
One Albuquerque application, which sought to centralize access to
city departments and their services, making them more accessible.
It also developed the ABQRIDE for the municipal transit system,
allowing users to calculate fares and track buses.

The company also developed a permitting application for Bernalillo
County, as well as an app for Roadrunner Food Bank and the
Albuquerque International Balloon Museum. The company came up with
an idea for an artificial intelligence-based chatbot designed to
help immigrants access services, according to reporting from
GovTech. Its founder and CEO, Lisa Abeyta, also worked to uplift
women in tech, which is notorious for its low levels of female
employment. She declined comment on the bankruptcy.

APPCityLife raised more than $1.6 million over the course of two
funding rounds, according to U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission filings. In 2013, it acquired its longtime partner,
OnQueue Technologies, which worked with cloud-based computing
technologies. At the time of the deal, Abeyta said in a statement
that APPCityLife had about 50,000 "active users on our platform" in
the Albuquerque market.

In 2015, APPCityLife partnered with California software firm Accela
Inc. to offer the tech company's CityLife platform, enabling city
governments to design and deploy applications.

The company, which was a 2017 Business First Innovation New Mexico
winner, has faced financial difficulties. Between October 2018 and
March of this 2021, the company was hit with four federal tax liens
totaling more than $140,000, according to records from the
Bernalillo County Clerk's Office.

Abeyta previously said APPCityLife's financial situation stemmed in
part from a capital commitment from a New Mexico-based investment
group that fell through after she was told the funds had been
wired, Business First reported.

                        About APPCityLife

APPCityLife is an Albuquegue-based tech company founded in 2009
that created tech tools. It sought Chapter 7 protection (Bankr.
D.N.M. Case No. 21-10608) on May 13, 2021.  In the petition,
APPCityLife estimated assets of between $0 million and $50,000 and
estimated liabilities of $588,028


ASTRA ACQUISITION: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Astra Acquisition Corp.'s (Astra, d.b.a.
Anthology) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B'. Fitch has
also affirmed the 'BB-'/'RR2' rating for Astra's secured revolving
credit facility and first lien term loan and 'CCC+'/'RR6' rating
for its second lien term loan. Fitch has assigned a 'B' IDR to
Astra Intermediate Holding Corp. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The ratings reflect Astra's high customer retention rates, strong
recurring revenues, significant market position in the student
information system (SIS) market, comprehensive product offerings
and strong cloud-based technology platform. Fitch believes these
strengths position the company to benefit from the secular growth
trends in EdTech spending. Astra's Fitch-calculated pro forma total
leverage (total debt with equity credit/EBITDA) of roughly 7x at
fiscal year-end 2021. The debt burden as well as the limited size
and market share constrain the rating to the 'B' range.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Pandemic Impact: The economic dislocation caused by the coronavirus
may adversely affect the technology upgrade investment cycle. The
pandemic caused wide-spread delays in university procurement
processes in 2020, which resulted in a few new bookings pushed into
2021. While Fitch expected some colleges to face funding pressure
due to the pandemic, Astra's subscription model provided revenue
stability through 2020.

The company's core business is very sticky as the SIS system is
mission critical to most of the schools regardless of student
enrollment. A small proportion of schools with exposure to
international students faced more financial difficulties. However,
the impact on Astra was manageable given their relatively smaller
size and the company's diversified customer base. The pandemic
actually raised awareness among schools the importance of
information technology to support remote learning.

Subscription Sales Drive Recurring Revenues: Around 77% of Astra's
LTM revenues are recurring in nature (combination of maintenance
and subscription). Astra's subscription-based offering is well
established with subscription revenues (47% of total revenues)
growth outpacing declines in maintenance (26% of revenues) and
perpetual licenses (4% of revenues). For YTD December 2020, the
gross renewal rate and net retention rate was 95% and 98%,
respectively, which was in line with the prior year. Fitch expects
continued growth in subscription revenues will drive margin
expansion.

Diversified Customer Base: The merger of CMC and EdCentric in 2020
resulted in approximately 2,100 customers, and together the
top-five contribute 7% of total revenues. The limited customer
overlap between the two companies with complementary product
offerings provide significant cross-selling opportunities. The
average customer only uses 1.7 Astra products. On a combined basis,
Astra's annual customer retention rates are in excess of 90% with
gross ACV retention in excess of 95%, highlighting the stable and
attractive client base.

Strong Margins and FCF Support Higher Leverage: Astra's around 30%
EBITDA margins are in line with its SaaS peers in this scale
category. Despite the sizeable interest burden, Fitch expects Astra
will generate mid- to high-single digit FCF margins that will
increase to the teens as operating leverage, synergies and cost
savings are achieved.

Attractive Industry Dynamics: Astra is benefiting from secular
tailwinds for the higher ed software sector. Firstly, Astra is
expected to benefit from the 12% growth expected in the sector
globally. Secondly, Higher Ed institutions are showing a greater
willingness to deploy a cloud-based platform as a means to build a
more flexible technology platform and also to contain tech costs as
the existing systems are 20+ years old. Astra is uniquely
positioned to benefit from this shift. Demand for Higher Education
is largely a-cyclical, with enrollments growing at a steady rate of
1.3% from 2000-2020.

Ownership Could Limit Deleveraging: Anthology is majority-owned by
private equity firm Veritas Capital. Fitch believes private equity
ownership is likely to result in some level of ongoing leverage to
optimize ROE. As the company is in the process of executing on its
cost optimization plans, gross leverage remains at approximately 7x
for fiscal year-end 2021. Fitch expects the company to gradually
delever through EBITDA growth with periodic dividend
recapitalization that could reset financial leverage at elevated
levels. This could constrain upside in ratings.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Fitch's ratings and Outlook for Astra are supported by the
company's highly recurring revenues, strong product portfolio and
technology platform and proven ability to gainshare relative to
their larger peers. A sizable installed base of subscriptions and a
strong professional services backlog provide near-term revenue
stability, despite the near-term headwinds to the higher education
sector.

Astra's ratings are constrained by its smaller scale relative to
the larger and more diversified education software peers, such as
Ellucian (not rated), Oracle (BBB+/Negative) and Workday (not
rated) and its high leverage.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Revenues are expected to grow at a mid- to high-single-digit
    rate as college enrollments stabilize.

-- EBITDA margins are expected to improve to the 30% range driven
    by the combination of both companies and the resulting
    synergies, cost savings arising from greater usage of the
    India Delivery center and shifting toward higher margin
    recurring business.

-- Working capital and Capex assumptions in line with historical
    trends.

Recovery Considerations

The recovery analysis assumes that Astra would be considered a
going concern in bankruptcy and that the company would be
reorganized rather than liquidated. Fitch has assumed a 10%
administrative claim.

Astra's recovery analysis assumes significant delays in new
software sales and implementations and ongoing industry issues in
the Higher Ed segment dragging down revenues.
Longer-than-anticipated coronavirus-related shutdowns delay the
company's ability to achieve the previously detailed cost cuts and
synergies, further pressuring margins. The post-reorganization
going concern EBITDA of roughly $48 million also takes into account
Astra's operating performance relative to its competitors and its
overall industry segments.

Fitch assumes that Astra will receive a going concern recovery
multiple of 7x. The estimate considers several factors including
the company's highly recurring revenue streams, the strength of the
product offering, stability of end market demand and the long-term
secular growth trends for the sector. The estimate also considers
the strong trading multiples for other software providers to the
higher education system like Chegg and Blackbaud. Additionally,
median M&A multiples for the sector are in the double-digit range.

Fitch assumes a fully drawn revolver ($40 million) in its recovery
analysis since credit revolvers are tapped as companies are under
distress.

Fitch estimates strong recovery prospects for the first lien credit
facilities and rates them 'BB-'/'RR2', or two notches above Astra's
'B' IDR. Fitch estimates limited recovery prospects for the second
lien term loan and rates it 'CCC+'/'RR6', two notches below Astra's
IDR.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Management maintains total debt with equity credit / operating
    EBITDA below 5.5x;

-- (CFO-Capex)/Total Debt with equity credit greater than 8%;

-- Revenue growth in the high-single-digits, implying market
    share gains.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Fitch's expectation of forward total leverage sustaining above
    7x;

-- (CFO-Capex)/Total Debt with equity credit less than 3%;

-- Sustained negative revenue growth;

-- FFO Fixed Charge Coverage sustain below 1.5x.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Sufficient Liquidity: Astra had $44.6 million of cash on hand as of
Dec. 31, 2020 as well as full availability of its $40 million
revolver. Fitch forecasts the company will generate mid to high
single digit FCF margins in 2021, the first full year of the
combined entity and will increase to teen level as revenue growth,
synergies and cost savings are achieved. There are no material
near-term maturities and scheduled annual amortization only
comprises 1% of the First Lien Term Loan outstanding.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


ATKORE INC: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on New $400MM Unsec. Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of 'BB'/'RR4' to Atkore Inc.'s
(ATKR) proposed issuance of $400 million of 10-year senior
unsecured notes. Atkore intends to use the proceeds together with
the proceeds of a planned $400 million seven-year term loan to
refinance its existing $800 million term loan B that matures in
Dec. 2023.

Fitch currently rates Atkore Inc. and Atkore International, Inc.'s
Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) 'BB', the planned $400
million secured term loan 'BB+'/'RR2' and $325 million ABL revolver
'BBB-'/'RR1'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Strengths and Concerns: The ratings take into account Atkore's
leading market position in electrical raceway products in the U.S.,
moderate financial leverage and healthy cash flow generation. These
factors are offset by Atkore's relatively narrow product line, the
low technology and commoditized nature of its products, its
significant exposure to the cyclical U.S. commercial construction
market and commodity cost exposure.

Leading Market Positions: Atkore's leading market position is
supported by a broad offering within its categories, high product
quality and timely deliveries. This helps Atkore compete in a
market characterized by low technology and commoditized products,
primarily conduit tubing and framing for electrical work.
Competition is meaningful given the relatively substitutable nature
of the company's products and a wide range of national and smaller
regional competitors.

Cyclical Non-Residential Construction Market: U.S. non-residential
new construction accounts for a significant 30%-40% of Atkore's
business. Volume declines in fiscal 2020 were focused in highly
affected subsectors such as retail and hotel, and have been offset
in part by construction in data centers, warehouses, renovation and
single-family residential. Fitch expects these trends to continue
through fiscal 2021, with a recovery in the most damaged subsectors
not expected until 2022.

Commodity Exposure: Atkore's profitability is exposed to the price
fluctuations of commodities such as PVC resin, copper and steel;
however, the company has shown the ability to quickly pass through
higher input costs in its prices. In periods of high input material
inflation, the company may experience a time lag to recoup pricing.
Atkore's Electrical segment (75% of sales) generally sells its
products on a spot basis, while its Safety & Infrastructure segment
(25% of sales) maintains contracts with its OEM customers that
typically experience a three-month lag for selling prices to catch
up to commodity price changes.

Moderate Financial Leverage: Atkore's leverage is moderate for the
'BB' category, with the company having focused on deleveraging the
business over the past few years. Gross leverage (total
debt/EBTIDA) improved to 1.6x at March 31, 2021 from 2.5x at
September 2020, but it will likely trend toward the low-2.0x range
as the company executes its M&A strategy and continues to
repurchase its shares.

Improving Profitability: Atkore's EBITDA and FCF margins can vary
year-to-year, but have been on a generally improving trend over the
past four years. Atkore's sales declined 7.9% to $1.8 billion in
fiscal year 2020 (Sept. 30, 2020), primarily due to lower volumes
and lower selling prices during the height of the pandemic.
Revenues have recovered relatively quickly, returning to a growth
in fiscal 2021. The company's recent results have further
benefitted from recent supply shortages in PVC electrical conduit,
leading to a surge in prices and EBITDA margins in fiscal 2021.
Fitch assumes that market conditions will normalize in fiscal 2022,
when EBITDA margins are expected to return to around the fiscal
2019 level of 18.7%.

Solid FCF: Atkore generated FCF of $200 million in fiscal 2020, and
Fitch projects the FCF will improve to around $300 million, or
12%-13% of revenues, in fiscal years 2021 and 2022, supported by
higher EBITDA. Fitch expects cash flow will be deployed to bolt-on
M&A and share repurchases with the potential for a larger,
leveraging acquisition. The company has adequate liquidity
consisting of healthy cash balances, ABL revolver availability and
no significant maturities until 2026.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Atkore is a diversified manufacturer of electrical and tubular
products serving mainly the non-residential construction markets in
the U.S. Atkore's competition ranges from small, regional
manufacturers to large global industrial companies and electrical
equipment manufacturers such as Eaton Corporation (BBB+/Negative),
nVent Electric (BBB-/Stable) and Hubbell Inc. (A-/Stable), which
maintain more diversified portfolios with products possessing a
higher degree of technology. Atkore's rating is disadvantaged by
its outsized exposure to the cyclical non-residential construction
markets, although this is somewhat offset by its somewhat diverse
exposure to various subsectors with the industry. Atkore's rating
is supported by its moderate size with revenues near $2 billion.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Fitch assumes fiscal 2021 organic growth of 40% driven to a
    large degree by higher selling prices due to supply and demand
    imbalances in PVC. Revenues in 2022 decline by 20% due to
    assumed declines in prices of steel and PVC and competitive
    pressures;

-- EBITDA margins increase by around 800bps in fiscal 2021 driven
    by increased demand and industry supply constraints. EBITDA
    margins decline in 2022 by a similar amount due to a
    normalization of industry supply and demand and competitive
    price pressures;

-- Leverage drops to 1.2x (total debt with equity
    credit/operating EBITDA) in 2021 and trends back towards the
    company's target at 2.0x-2.5x by 2024 as the company executes
    its acquisition strategy;

-- FCF margins are expected to be in the low double digits.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Debt/EBITDA below 2.0x through the cycle;

-- A significant improvement in product and end market
    diversification that reduces cyclicality;

-- A demonstrated improvement in margins through cycles.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Debt/EBITDA above 3.0x for a sustained period;

-- A significant decline in sales and/or margins that signals
    intensifying competition or an inability to pass on increased
    commodity prices;

-- Challenges in integrating a larger, debt-funded acquisition.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Liquidity: As of March 26, 2021, Atkore had adequate liquidity of
$620 million, which consisted of $304 million in cash and cash
equivalents ($53.2 million of which was held at non-U.S.
subsidiaries) and $316 million in available funds under its $325
million ABL revolver. Fitch expects the company to have adequate
liquidity to fund growth, including capital expenditures of around
$55 million per year and growth in working capital.

Capital Structure: As of March 26, 2021, the company's debt
consisted of $772 million outstanding on its term loan B that
matures in December 2023.


AVANTOR FUNDING: Moody's Rates New $1.1BB Incremental Loan 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 rating to Avantor Funding,
Inc. proposed incremental term loan due 2028 for EUR930 million
($1.1 billion). There are no changes to Avantor's existing ratings
including the Ba3 Corporate Family Rating, Ba3-PD Probability of
Default Rating, Ba1 senior secured rating, and SGL-1 Speculative
Grade Liquidity rating. The outlook remains stable.

Proceeds of the offering will be primarily used to finance the
acquisition of Ritter GmbH and its affiliates -- a German
healthcare technology company that specializes in proprietary
products for clinical diagnostics and drug discovery that Avantor
has agreed to acquire for EUR890 million. Moody's views the
transaction as a credit negative as it will increase Avantor's pro
forma leverage to close to 5x up from 4.5x on the twelve months
ending December 31, 2020. This incorporates earnings contribution
from Ritter (annual revenue of approximately EUR225 million) and
the incremental debt to fund the acquisition. While the acquisition
will increase leverage, Moody's considers the acquisition to be
strategically sensible as Ritter has strong organic growth
opportunities and will benefit from Avantor's strong existing
customer relationships.

Ratings assigned:

Issuer: Avantor Funding, Inc.

Senior Secured EUR Term Loan expiring 2028, Assigned Ba1 (LGD2)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Avantor's Ba3 CFR is supported by the company's track record of
delivering good revenue and earnings growth. It also reflects
moderate financial leverage with adjusted debt/EBITDA of 5 times
(pro-forma for the Ritter acquisition). The rating is supported by
the steady and largely recurring nature of around 85% of revenue,
as well as high customer switching costs associated with the
ultra-high purity materials business. It also reflects good scale
with revenues of approximately $6.4 billion and good customer,
geographic, and product diversification. Moody's expects Avantor
will generate strong free cash flow over the next 12-18 months.

Near term, the COVID-19 pandemic has presented opportunities to
Avantor; the company has been involved in the production of both
COVID-19 therapies and vaccines but also benefitted from increased
demand for PPE and Diagnostic testing. Moody's expects this
tailwind to continue in 2021, but it is likely to be temporary.
Meanwhile, Avantor has also invested to meet growing demand in its
bioproduction capabilities. This is supported by a moderate
increase in capex geared towards strengthening Avantor's position
as a key supplier for the biopharma industry. Moody's expects
Avantor to use some of its financial flexibility to fulfill its
external growth strategy, such as its pending acquisition of
Ritter.

The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating of SGL-1 reflects Moody's
expectation that Avantor's liquidity will remain very good over the
next 12 to 18 months. Avantor's liquidity is supported by $173
million of cash as of March 31, 2021. Moody's estimates that
Avantor will generate over $700 million of free cash flow over the
next 12 months, aided by working capital management and lower
interest expense. External liquidity is supported by a $515 million
senior secured revolving credit facility expiring in July 2025.
Furthermore, the company has an accounts receivable securitization
facility (unrated) that provides for borrowings of up to $300
million, which expires in March 2023.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Avantor's
debt/EBITDA will improve toward the 4.0-4.5 times within 12-18
months of closing of the Ritter acquisition, primarily through
earnings growth and debt repayment.

Avantor faces some degree of environmental risk due to the handling
of, manufacturing, use or sale of substances that are or could be
classified as toxic or hazardous materials. From a governance
standpoint, Avantor has adopted more conservative financial
policies since its 2019 IPO, including a publicly stated
debt/EBITDA target range of 2.0 - 4.0 times. The company typically
meets or exceeds its guidance. Regarding social risk, Avantor is
exposed to both positive and negative social considerations.
Moody's regards the coronavirus pandemic as a social risk under its
ESG framework given the substantial implications for public health
and safety. The pandemic has reduced demand for some of Avantor's
products due to the temporary closure of some research facilities
and lower demand from healthcare and industrial customers. However,
the company has been involved in the production of COVID-19
therapies and vaccines and benefitted from increased demand for PPE
and diagnostic testing, which has supported earnings growth in the
latter half of 2020.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if Avantor further improves its scale
and business line diversity. Specifically, debt to EBITDA sustained
below 3.5 times would support an upgrade.

The ratings could be downgraded if Avantor's operating performance
deteriorates, or if it engages in large debt-funded acquisitions. A
downgrade could also occur if debt to EBITDA is sustained above 5.0
times. Following the proposed increase in secured debt to fund the
Ritter acquisition, there is limited cushion in the Ba1 senior
secured instrument rating.

Avantor is a global provider of mission critical products and
services to the life sciences and advanced technologies & applied
materials industries. Headquartered in Pennsylvania, the company
generates revenue of approximately $6.4 billion annually.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.


BCR PARTNERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region X disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of BCR Partners, LLC.
  
                        About BCR Partners

BCR Partners -- https://bransoncedarsresort.com -- is a vacation
destination offering tree houses, log cabins and bungalows.

BCR Partners filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Case No. 21-60121) on Feb.
26, 2021.  Michael Hyams, chief operating officer and partner,
signed the petition.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had between
$1 million and $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  Berman,
DeLeve, Kuchan & Chapman, LLC represents the Debtor as legal
counsel.


BEP ULTERRA: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'B3' CFR to Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed BEP Ulterra Holdings, Inc.'s
(Ulterra) ratings, including its B3 Corporate Family Rating, B3-PD
Probability of Default Rating, and B3 senior secured term loan
ratings. The rating outlook was changed to stable from negative.

Affirmations:

Issuer: BEP Ulterra Holdings, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: BEP Ulterra Holdings, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

The change of the outlook to stable reflects Moody's expectations
that the company will maintain adequate liquidity and will see a
gradual improvement in earnings and cash flow generation in
2021-22.

Ulterra's B3 CFR incorporates Moody's expectation that the company
will benefit modestly from stabilizing industry conditions in
2021-22. With the limited growth in demand, Ulterra's highly
variable cost structure will allow the company to generate enough
cash flow to cover its proportionally higher capital spending, debt
payments, and working capital requirements. Ulterra remains a
cyclical company with cash flows highly correlated to the
volatility of upstream drilling. Moody's expects that Ulterra's
leverage and interest coverage will start to improve, with
Debt/EBITDA recovering to below 7x and EBITDA/interest to around 2x
in 2021 and will continue to improve in 2022.

The CFR is constrained by the company's small scale and single
product line focus in a niche segment of Polycrystalline Diamond
Compact (PDC) drill-bits.

Moody's expects Ulterra to maintain adequate liquidity, supported
by its cash balance of $27 million at the end of 2020 and
substantial availability under its $50 million super priority
revolving credit facility, maturing in November 2023. The revolving
credit facility has a number of financial covenants, including
maintaining a maximum net super priority debt/EBITDA ratio of 1.0x
at all times and a springing net total debt/EBITDA covenant of 4.5x
tested when utilization exceeds 60%. Ulterra should remain in
compliance with its covenants through 2022 and Moody's does not
expect the revolver utilization to reach the level that makes the
total leverage covenant operational.

The senior secured term loan maturing in 2025 has a first lien
pledge of all the assets of the issuer and guarantors, including
the operating subsidiaries, and is rated B3 (the same as the CFR).
Although the $50 million super priority 2023 revolving credit
facility will be paid out on a first out basis in the event of
default, given the small size of the facility as compared to the
size of the term loan, the term loan is rated the same as the CFR.
The term loan facility and the revolving credit facility have liens
on the assets of the company and its downstream guarantors and the
subsidiaries.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade of the B3 ratings may be achieved if Ulterra maintains
leverage below 4.5x, with good liquidity amid a broader recovery in
drilling activity in the US. Ratings could be downgraded if
Ulterra's liquidity position weakens or its EBITDA/Interest does
not recover to 2.5x.

Ulterra Holdings, Inc. is a manufacturer of Polycrystalline Diamond
Compact (PDC) drill bits and stick-slip reduction tools
headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas. Ulterra is owned by the private
equity firms Blackstone Group and American Securities.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Oilfield
Services Industry Rating Methodology published in May 2017.


BLINK CHARGING: Incurs $7.4 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Blink Charging Co. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $7.36 million on $2.23 million of total revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $2.96
million on $1.30 million of total revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $251.94 million in total
assets, $8.77 million in total liabilities, and $243.17 million in
total stockholders' equity.

For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company
used cash of $8,497,978 and $3,413,141, respectively, in
operations.  The Company's cash use for the three months ended
March 31, 2021 was primarily attributable to its net loss of
$7,364,475, adjusted for net non-cash expenses in the aggregate
amount of $1,054,705, and $2,188,208 of net cash used in changes in
the levels of operating assets and liabilities.  The Company's cash
used for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was primarily
attributable to its net loss of $2,961,100, adjusted for net
non-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $220,023, and $672,064
of net cash used in changes in the levels of operating assets and
liabilities.

During the three months ended March 31, 2021, net cash used in
investing activities was $40,582,908, of which, $36,562,212 was
provided in connection with the purchase of marketable securities
and $4,020,696 was used to purchase charging stations and other
fixed assets.  During the three months ended March 31, 2020, net
cash provided by investing activities was $799,614, of which,
$1,100,516 was provided in connection with the sale of marketable
securities and $300,902 was used to purchase charging stations and
other fixed assets.

During the three months ended March. 31, 2021, cash provided in
financing activities was $222,385,807, of which, $221,405,782 was
provided by the sale of common stock in a public offering and
$999,540 was provided upon the exercise of warrants, this was
offset by $19,515 used to pay down the Company's liability in
connection with internal use software.  During the three months
ended March 31, 2020, cash used in financing activities was $17,989
which was used to pay down its liability in connection with
internal use software.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had cash, working capital and an
accumulated deficit of $195,646,354, $230,972,150 and $194,715,923,
respectively.  During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the
Company had a net loss of $7,364,475.

                       Management Comments

"Blink is off to a strong start and solidly positioned to drive
growth as we move through the balance of 2021.  We are excited by
the opportunities we see in the marketplace, and as evidenced
during the first quarter, we are perfectly situated to capitalize
on these opportunities.  It is an exciting and transformative time
for the industry and Blink.  We are optimistic about our future and
our leadership role in the worldwide EV charging infrastructure
industry," stated Michael D. Farkas, founder and chief executive
officer of Blink.

"As a key contributor to the expanding EV landscape, we are
continuously looking for opportunities to strategically increase
our global assets while also making EV charging more accessible.
As such, we are very excited about this week's announced
acquisition of Blue Corner and the opportunity it provides Blink to
establish a significant presence in Europe immediately.
International expansion is fundamental to our growth, and we
believe this acquisition will accelerate the success we are already
achieving in Europe," Mr. Farkas continued.  "Blink's European
expansion allows the Company to capitalize on the robust European
EV industry where EVs comprise of a large and growing share of the
automotive market.  Sales of plug-in EVs in Europe rose 137% last
year compared to 4% growth in the U.S."

Brendan Jones, president of Blink, commented, "We started 2021 with
strong revenue and sales growth and continued progress with our
owner/operator business model, which we believe will further
contribute to our upward growth for the year.  We are energized by
the momentum we see in our industry and the substantial interest
we're seeing for Blink chargers.  The establishment of EV
infrastructure is becoming a priority in the U.S. and worldwide as
government entities, businesses, and local communities increasingly
encourage the adoption of electric vehicles to promote
sustainability and a greener, cleaner environment.  Blink is
pursuing and is poised to capture the many current, and future
charging opportunities as the world evolves to widespread EV use
and seeks reliable, fast, and accessible EV infrastructure to
support this transition."

"As we move through 2021, we remain intently focused on expanding
our leadership role in the EV charging industry and extending our
charging footprint, both domestically and internationally.  We made
tremendous progress during the first quarter, both in terms of new
deployments and new distribution opportunities and partnerships.
With our owner/operator business model, we target high density,
high volume locations such as hotels, multi-family residences, and
healthcare centers.  We are also working with a broad range of
countries, states, and municipalities to strengthen EV
infrastructure as more individual drivers and fleets transition to
greener transportation.  The structure of our owner/operator
agreements is comprised of long-term, renewable contracts with a
revenue sharing model in which we receive payment each time a
vehicle is charged at a Blink-owned unit, creating the potential to
generate a valuable recurring revenue stream for many years to come
as EV utilization increases," stated Farkas.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1429764/000149315221011337/form10-q.htm

                       About Blink Charging

Based in Miami Beach, Florida, Blink Charging Co. (OTC: CCGID)
f/k/a Car Charging Group Inc. -- http://www.CarCharging.com-- is
an owner and operator of electric vehicle charging stations in the
United States and a growing presence in Europe, Asia, Israel, the
Caribbean, and South America.  The Blink Network utilizes
proprietary cloud-based software that operates, maintains, and
tracks the EV charging stations connected to the network, along
with the associated charging data.  The Company has established key
strategic partnerships to roll out adoption across numerous
location types, including parking facilities, multifamily
residences and condos, workplace locations, health care/medical
facilities, schools and universities, airports, auto dealers,
hotels, mixed-use municipal locations, parks and recreation areas,
religious institutions, restaurants, retailers, stadiums,
supermarkets, and transportation hubs.

Blink Charging reported a net loss of $17.85 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $9.65 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$33.98 million in total assets, $6.82 million in total liabilities,
and $27.16 million in total stockholders' equity.


BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: Considers Its Ch. 11 Plan as The Best Option
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that the Boy Scouts of America have doubled down
just ahead of a crucial Chapter 11 disclosure hearing on warnings
that their preferred Delaware bankruptcy reorganization plan offers
the only alternative to protracted sexual abuse claim litigation,
local council bankruptcies and sinking memberships in some regions.
According to amended plan and disclosure statements produced during
a prehearing flurry of filings Sunday, May 16, 2021, the group's
unrestricted cash and investments could fall by more than 50% in
2025 in the event the proposed global deal collapses, while
memberships would decline by 5% overall as litigation over damages
for sexual abuse survivors.

                         About Boy Scouts of America

The Boy Scouts of America -- https://www.scouting.org/ -- is a
federally chartered non-profit corporation under title 36 of the
United States Code. Founded in 1910 and chartered by an act of
Congress in 1916, the BSA's mission is to train youth in
responsible citizenship, character development, and self-reliance
through participation in a wide range of outdoor activities,
educational programs, and, at older age levels, career-oriented
programs in partnership with community organizations. Its national
headquarters is located in Irving, Texas.

The Boy Scouts of America and affiliate Delaware BSA, LLC, sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-10343) on
Feb. 18, 2020, to deal with sexual abuse claims.

Boy Scouts of America was estimated to have $1 billion to $10
billion in assets and at least $500 million in liabilities as of
the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors have tapped Sidley Austin LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as Delaware counsel,
and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as financial advisor.  Omni
Agent Solutions is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed a tort claimants' committee
and an unsecured creditors' committee on March 5, 2020.  The tort
claimants' committee is represented by Pachulski Stang Ziehl &
Jones, LLP, while the unsecured creditors' committee is represented
by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP.


BOY SCOUTS: Roman Catholic Archbishop Opposes Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles (RCALA) and its
related BSA-chartered organizations (ADLA Chartered Organizations)
join in the objection filed by The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints to the Disclosure Statement explaining the Second
Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Boy Scouts of America
and Delaware BSA, LLC.

RCALA and the ADLA Chartered Organizations have filed claims
against the Debtors for indemnity and contribution constituted as
"Indirect Abuse Claims" under the Plan.  The Objectors point out to
the Court that their Claims are proposed to be channeled to the
Settlement Trust, which is subjected to vague and indeterminate
procedures for allowance and payment.

RCALA and the ADLA Chartered Organizations understand that they
have rights as insureds under certain of the BSA's and Local
Councils' insurance policies that are proposed to be assigned to
the Settlement Trust under the Plan.  "These right rights would be
effectively cut off by the proposed Insurance Entity Injunction
under the Plan," Patrick A. Jackson, Esq., at FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE
& REATH LLP, counsel for the objectors, told the Court.
Accordingly, RCALA and the ADLA Chartered Organizations submit that
the Plan is patently unconfirmable in its current form and the
Disclosure Statement fails to provide "adequate information"
required under Chapter 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code.  

The Objectors, by their joinder, ask the Court to deny approval of
the Disclosure Statement, or in the alternative, rule that the
Disclosure Statement provides for a patently unconfirmable Plan on
which votes should not be solicited.

A copy of the joinder is available for free at
https://bit.ly/3eTH5Vo from Omni Agent Solutions, claims agent.

The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles and its related
BSA-chartered organizations are represented by:

     Patrick A. Jackson, Esq.
     Ian J. Bambrick, Esq.
     Kaitlin W. MacKenzie, Esq.
     FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
     222 Delaware Ave., Suite 1410
     Wilmington, DE 19801-1621
     Telephone: (302) 467-4200
     Facsimile: (302) 467-4201
     Email: Patrick.Jackson@faegredrinker.com
                Ian.Bambrick@faegredrinker.com
                Kaitlin.MacKenzie@faegredrinker.com

            - and -

     Michael P. Pompeo, Esq.
     FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
     1177 Avenue of the Americas, 41st Floor
     New York, NY 10036-2714
     Telephone: (212) 248-3140
     Facsimile: (212) 248-3141
     Email: Michael.Pompeo@faegredrinker.com

                   About Boy Scouts of America

The Boy Scouts of America -- https://www.scouting.org/ -- is a
federally chartered non-profit corporation under title 36 of the
United States Code. Founded in 1910 and chartered by an act of
Congress in 1916, the BSA's mission is to train youth in
responsible citizenship, character development, and self-reliance
through participation in a wide range of outdoor activities,
educational programs, and, at older age levels, career-oriented
programs in partnership with community organizations. Its national
headquarters is located in Irving, Texas.

The Boy Scouts of America and affiliate Delaware BSA, LLC, sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-10343) on
Feb. 18, 2020, to deal with sexual abuse claims.

Boy Scouts of America was estimated to have $1 billion to $10
billion in assets and at least $500 million in liabilities as of
the bankruptcy filing.

The Debtors have tapped Sidley Austin LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as Delaware counsel,
and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as financial advisor.  Omni
Agent Solutions is the claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed a tort claimants' committee
and an unsecured creditors' committee on March 5, 2020.  The tort
claimants' committee is represented by Pachulski Stang Ziehl &
Jones, LLP, while the unsecured creditors' committee is represented
by Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP.


BRECKENRIDGE HILLS: Gets Interim OK to Hire L.K. Wood as Broker
---------------------------------------------------------------
Breckenridge Hills Fuel, LLC and Shri Narayan, LLC received interim
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri to hire L.K. Wood Realty Services, Inc. as their exclusive
real estate broker.

The Debtors require a real estate broker to market their properties
located at (i) 1999 Highway Z, Pevely, Mo.; 416 Benham St., Bonne
Terre, Mo.; 1125 Sycamore Lane, St. Clair, Mo.; and 4390 Telegraph
Road, St. Louis, Mo.

L.K. Wood will be paid a 6 percent commission on the sales price.

As disclosed in court filings, L.K. Wood is a "disinterested
person" within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     L.K. Wood, Jr.
     L.K. Wood Realty Services Inc.
     8460 Watson Rd #112
     St. Louis, MO 63119
     Phone: +1 314-849-6300

                   About Breckenridge Hills Fuel
                         and Shri Narayan

Breckenridge Hills Fuel, LLC leases out two gas stations and
convenience stores located at 1125 Sycamore Lane, St. Clair, Mo.
and 4390 Telegraph Road, St. Louis, Mo.  Shri Narayan, LLC owns and
operates two gas stations and convenience stores located at 1999
Highway Z, Pevely, Mo., and 416 Benham St., Bonne Terre, Mo.

Breckenridge Hills Fuel and Shri Narayan filed petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case Nos.
21-41572 and 21-41573) on April 25, 2021.  Milapkumar P. Patel,
member and manager of the Debtors, also sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 21-41571) on April 25, 2021.
The cases are jointly administered under Case No. 21-41571).  Judge
Bonnie L. Clair presides over the cases.  

Breckenridge Hills Fuel and Shri Narayan disclosed total assets of
up to $50,000 and liabilities of up to $10 million at the time of
the filing.

The Debtors are represented by Angela Redden-Jansen, Esq.


BRECKENRIDGE HILLS: Gets Interim OK to Hire Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Breckenridge Hills Fuel, LLC and Shri Narayan, LLC received interim
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri to hire Angela Redden-Jansen, Esq., an attorney practicing
in Maplewood, Mo., to handle their Chapter 11 cases.

Ms. Redden-Jansen will provide these services:

   (a) analyze the Debtors' financial condition;

   (b) prepare and file statement of financial affairs, Chapter 11
plan, disclosure statement and other papers which may be necessary
or appropriate in the Debtors' bankruptcy proceedings;

   (c) represent the Debtors at the meeting of creditors and court
hearings;

   (d) represent the Debtors in adversary proceedings and other
contested bankruptcy matters; and

   (e) assist the Debtors in the federal and state court lawsuits
and administrative proceedings related or ancillary to the
bankruptcy proceedings.

Ms. Redden-Jansen's standard rate is $325 per hour while the rates
for paralegals range from $140 to $245 per hour.  In addition to
the standard hourly rates to be charged, the Debtors will pay all
actual expenses incurred by the attorney.

Ms. Redden-Jansen received a retainer of $5,107.50.

As disclosed in court filings, Ms. Redden-Jansen does not represent
interest adverse to the Debtors in the matters upon which she is to
be engaged as attorney for the Debtors.

Ms. Redden-Jansen can be reached at:

     Angela Redden-Jansen, Esq.
     3350 Greenwood Blvd
     Saint Louis, MO 63143
     Tel: 314-645-5900
     Fax: 314-754-8104
     Email: amredden@swbell.net

                   About Breckenridge Hills Fuel
                         and Shri Narayan

Breckenridge Hills Fuel, LLC leases out two gas stations and
convenience stores located at 1125 Sycamore Lane, St. Clair, Mo.
and 4390 Telegraph Road, St. Louis, Mo.  Shri Narayan, LLC owns and
operates two gas stations and convenience stores located at 1999
Highway Z, Pevely, Mo., and 416 Benham St., Bonne Terre, Mo.

Breckenridge Hills Fuel and Shri Narayan filed petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case Nos.
21-41572 and 21-41573) on April 25, 2021.  Milapkumar P. Patel,
member and manager of the Debtors, also sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 21-41571) on April 25, 2021.
The cases are jointly administered under Case No. 21-41571).  Judge
Bonnie L. Clair presides over the cases.  

Breckenridge Hills Fuel and Shri Narayan disclosed total assets of
up to $50,000 and liabilities of up to $10 million at the time of
the filing.

The Debtors are represented by Angela Redden-Jansen, Esq.


CANTERA COURT: Taps Pulman Cappuccio & Pullen as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cantera Court Complex, Inc. received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire Pulman,
Cappuccio & Pullen, LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will render these services:

    a. take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate, including the prosecution of actions on the
Debtor's behalf, the defense of any action commenced against
Debtor, the negotiation of disputes in which the Debtor is
involved, and the preparation of objections to claims filed against
the estate;

     b. prepare legal papers;

     c. advise the Debtor concerning legal questions regarding all
aspects of its Chapter 11 case, including issues regarding the
administration of assets, sale or lease of assets, claims and
objections to claims, and any appropriate litigation including
avoidance actions or affirmative claims of the estate against third
parties (in both bankruptcy court and other necessary judicial
forums);

     d. assist the Debtor in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; and

     e. perform all other necessary legal services in connection
with the case.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Randall A. Pulman, Partner       $500 per hour
     Thomas Rice, Counsel             $450 per hour
     Catherine Stone Curtis, Partner  $375 per hour
     Carissa Brewster, Associate      $200 per hour
     Paralegal                        $160 per hour

Pulman Cappuccio is a disinterested person under Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court papers filed by the firm.

The firm can be reached through:

     Randall A. Pulman, Esq.
     Thomas Rice, Esq.
     Catherine Stone Curtis, Esq.
     Pulman, Cappuccio & Pullen, LLP
     2161 NW Military Highway, Suite 400
     San Antonio, TX 78213
     Tel: (210) 222-9494
     Fax:  (210) 892-1610
     Email: rpulman@pulmanlaw.com
            trice@pulmanlaw.com
            ccurtis@pulmanlaw.com

                    About Cantera Court Complex

Cantera Court Complex, Inc. is the owner and operator of Cantera
Court Complex, one of the premier multi-tenant retail centers in
Laredo, Texas.  It also owns six residential properties doing
business as BMW Creative Homes that are under contracts for deed.

Cantera Court Complex sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 21-50044) on April
30, 2021. In the petition signed by Eric Lee Benavides, director,
the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Catherine S. Curtis, Esq., at Pulman, Cappuccio &
Pullen, LLP, is the Debtor's legal counsel.

Falcon International Bank, as lender, is represented by Richard E.
Haynes III at Trevino Haynes, PLLC.


CASTEX ENERGY: Committee Taps Seaport Global as Financial Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Castex Energy 2005
Holdco, LLC and its affiliates seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire Seaport
Global Securities, LLC as its financial advisor.

The firm's services include:

     a. analyzing the Debtors' budgets, weekly cash flow, assets
and liabilities, and overall financial condition;

     b. reviewing financial and operational information furnished
by the Debtors to the committee;  

     c. scrutinizing the economic terms of various agreements;

      d. analyzing the Debtors' proposed business plans, plugging
and abandonment estimates, valuation of assets, plan of liquidation
and developing alternative scenarios, if necessary;

     e. assessing the Debtors' various pleadings and proposed
treatment of unsecured creditor claims;

     f. preparing or reviewing avoidance action and claim
analyses;

     g. assisting the committee in reviewing the Debtors' financial
reports;

     h. advising the committee on the current state of the Debtors'
Chapter 11 cases;

     i. advising the committee in negotiations with the Debtors and
third parties, as necessary;

     j. if necessary, participating as a witness in hearings before
the court with respect to matters upon which Seaport has provided
advice; and

     k. any other activities approved by the committee and its
legal counsel and agreed to by Seaport.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Managing Director    $600 per hour
     Vice President       $510 per hour
     Associate            $360 per hour
     Analyst              $240 per hour
     Paraprofessional     $185 per hour

Thomas Thompson, managing director at Seaport, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" within the meaning
of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Thomas Thompson
     Seaport Global Securities LLC
     360 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: 212-616-7700

                  About Castex Energy 2005 Holdco

Castex Energy 2005 Holdco, LLC and its affiliates, Castex Energy
2005, LLC, Castex Energy Partners, LLC, and Castex Offshore, Inc.,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 21-30710) on Feb. 26, 2021.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between $100 million
and $500 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Okin Adams LLP as bankruptcy counsel, The Claro
Group, LLC as financial advisor, and Thompson & Knight LLP as
special counsel and conflicts counsel.  Douglas Brickley, managing
director at Claro Group, serves as the Debtors' chief restructuring
officer.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. is the notice, claims and
balloting agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  Stewart
Robbins Brown & Altazan, LLC and Howley Law, PLLC serve as the
committee's bankruptcy counsel and local counsel, respectively.
Seaport Global Securities, LLC is the committee's financial
advisor.


CLEAN ENERGY: Posts $1.1 Million Net Profit in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing
net profit of $1.07 million on $135,275 of sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $313,574 on
$858,816 of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $6.71 million in total
assets, $8.95 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $2.24 million.

The Company had a working capital deficit of $3,165,663 as of March
31, 2021.  The company also had an accumulated deficit of
$16,582,898 as of March 31, 2021 and used $663,192 in net cash from
operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2021.
Therefore, the Company said, there is doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.  There can be no assurance that the
Company will achieve its goals and reach profitable operations and
is still dependent upon its ability (1) to obtain sufficient debt
and/or equity capital and/or (2) to generate positive cash flow
from operations.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1329606/000149315221011419/form10q.htm

                         About Clean Energy

Headquartered in Costa Mesa, California, Clean Energy Technologies,
Inc. -- http://www.cetyinc.com-- designs, produces and markets
clean energy products and integrated solutions focused on energy
efficiency and renewables.

Clean Energy reported a net loss of $3.44 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.56 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$4.12 million in total assets, $11.36 million in total liabilities,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $7.24 million.

Spokane, Washington-based Fruci & Associates II, PLLC, the
Company's auditor since 2015, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated April 15, 2021, citing that the
Company has an accumulated deficit, net losses, negative working
capital, and has utilized significant net cash in operations.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.


CLEVELAND BIOLABS: Incurs $547,205 Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Cleveland Biolabs, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $547,205 on zero revenue for the three months ended March 31,
2021, compared to a net loss of $601,728 on $156,042 of total
revenues from grants and contracts for the three months ended March
31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $14.70 million in total
assets, $518,151 in total liabilities, and $14.18 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company has incurred net losses of approximately $170 million
from its inception through March 31, 2021.  Historically, the
Company has not generated, and does not expect to generate in the
immediate future, revenue from sales of product candidates.

Cleveland Biolabs said, "We have incurred cumulative net losses and
expect to incur additional losses related to our R&D activities.
We do not have commercial products and have limited capital
resources and our contracts and grants with the DoD were completed
in 2020, meaning that we are currently not generating any revenues
or cash from operations.  At March 31, 2021, we had cash, cash
equivalents and short-term investments of $14.6 million, which
represents a increase of $12.4 million since the end of our last
fiscal year. This increase was caused by our capital raise and
warrant exercises, offset by our net cash used in operations of
$0.36 million during the three months ended March 31, 2021.  We
expect our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments, to
fund our projected operating requirements and allow us to fund our
operating plan, in each case, into May 2022.  However, until we are
able to commercialize our product candidates at a level that covers
our cash expenses, we will need to raise substantial additional
capital, which we may be unable to raise in sufficient amounts,
when needed and at acceptable terms.  Our plans with regard to
these matters may include seeking additional capital through debt
or equity financing, the sale or license of drug candidates, the
sale of certain of our tangible and/or intangible assets, the sale
of interests in our subsidiaries or joint ventures, obtaining
additional government research funding, or entering into other
strategic transactions. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to obtain future financing on acceptable terms, obtain
additional government financing for our operations, or enter into
other strategic transactions.  In addition, the recent outbreak of
the novel coronavirus known as COVID-19 has significantly disrupted
world financial markets, negatively impacted U.S. market conditions
and may reduce opportunities for us to seek out additional funding.
If we are unable to raise adequate capital and/or achieve
profitable operations, future operations might need to be scaled
back or discontinued.  The financial statements do not include any
adjustments relating to the recoverability of the carrying amount
of recorded assets and liabilities that might result from the
outcome of these uncertainties."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1318641/000143774921012189/cbli20210331_10q.htm

                     About Cleveland BioLabs

Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. -- http://www.cbiolabs.com-- is a
biopharmaceutical company developing novel approaches to activate
the immune system and address serious medical needs. The Company's
proprietary platform of Toll-like immune receptor activators has
applications in radiation mitigation and oncology. The Company's
most advanced product candidate is entolimod, which is being
developed as a medical radiation countermeasure for the prevention
of death from acute radiation syndrome and other indications in
radiation oncology.  The Company was incorporated in Delaware in
June 2003 and is headquartered in Buffalo, New York.

Cleveland Biolabs reported a net loss of $2.44 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.69 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$2.32 million in total assets, $304,611 in total liabilities, and
$2.01 million in total stockholders' equity.

Cleveland, Ohio-based Meaden & Moore, Ltd. issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated March 22, 2021, citing that the
Company has incurred losses each year from inception through Dec.
31, 2020, and continues to have negative cash flow from operations.
However, management believes, based on the current projections,
including the impact of the February 2021 equity raise, that the
Company will have enough funds to ensure continuing operations as a
stand-alone entity for a period of at least one year from the
issuance of these financial statements.


COLORADO HEALTH: U.S. Govt.'s Bid to 'Leafrog' Creditors Fails
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mary Anne Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law reports that the U.S.
government improperly used Affordable Care Act payments it owed a
defunct Colorado health insurer to satisfy part of a debt the
insurer owed it, as the state's insolvency laws didn't allow the
set off, the Federal Circuit said Monday, May 17, 2021.

Nothing in state law, the ACA, or the regulations implementing it
allowed the federal government to assert priority over Colorado
Health Insurance Cooperative Inc.'s other creditors in state
liquidation proceedings, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit said.

Colorado Health, a CO-OP program insurer, participated in the
Colorado reinsurance and risk-adjustment programs for benefit year
2015.  Because Colorado had declined to administer those programs,
HHS operated both.  For that year, HHS owed Colorado Health
$38,664,335 under the reinsurance program, and Colorado Health owed
HHS approximately  $42,000,000 under the risk-adjustment program.
In early 2016, before the final obligations for benefit year 2015
were tabulated, HHS made an early reinsurance payment.  Accounting
for that payment, HHS still owes Colorado Health $24,489,799.  No
other payments have been made.  Soon after HHS' early payment, a
Colorado court ordered Colorado Health into liquidation.
Liquidation is a bankruptcy-like proceeding during which a
liquidator, here Michael Conway, collects and distributes an
insurer's assets.

The government challenged a Claims Court decision, arguing that
Colorado law, as properly interpreted, affords it a right to offset
ACA debts during insolvency proceedings.    

"We hold that the government did not have a right to offset ACA
obligations during Colorado Health's insolvency proceedings and
that the Claims Court’s money judgment was proper," the Federal
Circuit ruled.

A copy of the Opinion is available at

http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/20-1292.OPINION.5-17-2021_1778434.pdf



COMMUNITY CARE: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Community Care Health Network,
LLC's (dba "Matrix") B2 corporate family rating and the B2
instrument ratings on the health services provider's senior secured
first-lien debt, which includes a $20 million revolving credit
facility and a $330 million term loan. Moody's upgraded Matrix's
probability of default rating to B2-PD, from B3-PD, to reflect the
company's more secure positioning in the B2 CFR and the related
improved default risk. Moody's has also changed the company's
outlook to stable, from negative.

Issuer: Community Care Health Network, LLC

Upgrades:

Probability of default rating, upgraded to B2-PD from B3-PD

Affirmations:

Corporate family rating, affirmed at B2

Senior secured 1st lien bank credit facility, affirmed at B2
(LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Community Care Health Network, LLC

Outlook, changed to stable, from negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's bases Matrix's improved outlook on the company's 50% surge
in revenue in 2020 and resultant improvements to leverage and
liquidity. The company was able to quickly repurpose its staff of
clinicians and its mobile clinics in response to the COVID-19
pandemic. While core comprehensive health assessment ("CHA")
volumes shrank in 2020, particularly in the second quarter, Matrix
deployed some 50 mobile clinics to major new corporate customers'
sites, where its clinicians and nurse practitioners ("NPs") could
perform COVID testing and clinical trials and provide employee
health and wellness services. The pivot to COVID-related employee
health and wellness and workplace-safety services led to the
formation of a new reporting unit, Clinical Solutions, which
provided more than half of Matrix's $415 million 2020 revenue.
Before 2020 the Risk Adjustment segment, in which CHA services are
booked, had represented more than 90% of Matrix's sales.

Matrix's Moody's-adjusted EBITDA doubled in 2020, to $95 million,
while leverage was cut by more than half, to 3.5 times at year end
2020, from 7.5 times at the end of 2019. While Moody's does not
expect a similar degree of operating improvement this year,
Matrix's core CHA unit will show sharp improvement as social
distancing restrictions are eased and NPs are able to resume
conducting face-to-face CHAs. Clinical Solutions' revenue will
contract, given both the premium pricing that had been commanded in
2020 because of the emergency nature of the services and a reversal
in the spread of the virus. However, Moody's believes that as
hard-hit industries resume operations, there will be continued
demand for Matrix's mobile, clinical capabilities, albeit at
steadily declining levels.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that even with only
marginal improvements in revenue in 2021 -- driven by a shifting
sales mix of sharply improving CHA revenue and contracting Clinical
Solutions revenue -- resultant credit metrics and liquidity will be
strong for the B2 CFR. While the Clinical Solutions segment
provides welcome revenue diversification, its long-term prospects
are uncertain. Moody's anticipates leverage to improve modestly
this year from the 3.5 times level at year end 2020. As a
percentage of debt, free cash flow will be in the high single
digits. Having already built to healthy levels as a result of
2020's unexpected operating performance, cash in 2021 will grow to
$90 million to $100 million, quite strong relative to about $315
million of funded debt. Moody's considers Matrix's liquidity as
good. Year-end 2020 cash of $70 million was more than double the
amount at the prior-year end period, even after using a moderate
amount of cash on a late-2020 acquisition. Moody's also expects the
company's small, $20 million revolving credit facility to remain
undrawn this year. Uncertainty with regard to the direction of
financial strategy, given private equity ownership and Matrix's
markedly improved liquidity position, weighs on the credit
ratings.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could upgrade Matrix's ratings if revenue growth can be
sustained in 2021, despite the sharply shifting mix; if leverage
continues to improve; and if its liquidity profile remains good or
better.

Moody's could downgrade the ratings if CHA-segment revenue does not
rebound as strongly as expected; if Moody's expects debt-to-EBITDA
leverage to be sustained above 6.0 times; or if Moody's anticipate
that annual free cash flow will approach breakeven.

Through its Risk Adjustment segment, Community Care Health Network,
LLC (dba Matrix Medical Network, "Matrix") provides primarily
home-based care management services for Medicare Advantage health
plans in the U.S., including comprehensive health assessments
("CHAs") and chronic and post-acute-care management.

Its Clinical Solutions unit focuses on providing employee health
and wellness services, COVID-19 symptom screening and testing,
vaccine studies and lab processing services. Moody's expect the
company to generate 2021 revenues of about $440 million. Matrix was
spun out from The Providence Service Corporation in an October 2016
buyout by Frazier Healthcare Partners.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.


COMMUNITY INTERVENTION: Plan to Pay 10% to 20% for Unsecureds
-------------------------------------------------------------
Community Intervention Services, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates
filed with the Bankruptcy Court a Joint Liquidating Plan and a
Disclosure Statement on May 14, 2021.

The Plan contemplates that $250,000 of funds (which are cash
collateral of Debtors' Senior Secured Lenders -- Fifth Third Bank
and Capital One, National Association, as agent for itself and
Fifth Third Bank), along with all proceeds of any estate causes of
action, for distribution to the Debtors' general unsecured
creditors for their allowed claims.

The Debtors' bankruptcy estates will be substantively consolidated
and administered by the Plan Administrator, who will take control
of the estate on the effective date of the Plan.  The Plan proposes
that Getzler Henrich & Associates, through David Campbell, would
serve as the Plan Administrator.  Mr. Campbell currently serves as
the Debtors' financial advisor.

The Plan provides for a single distribution of the $250,000 pool to
general unsecured creditors for their Allowed Claims to be made
promptly after the resolution of all claim objections.  The
unsecured creditors that will share in the $250,000 fund exclude
MWE (with a claim of $6,068,193); H.I.G. (with a claim of
$5,245,415); and the Severance Claimants (with claims totaling
$750,640).  The $250,000 pool is expected to generate distributions
between 10% and 20% of unsecured creditors' claims entitled to
share in the proceeds.  The Debtors currently anticipate that this
distribution is likely to be made by October 31, 2021.  The Senior
Secured Lenders and Capital One have agreed not to participate in
the distributions from the $250,000 pool, or the proceeds from any
avoidance action (if any), on account of their deficiency claims.


The Plan also provides for payment in full of all allowed priority
claims, including administrative claims (arising during the
Chapter 11 cases and the wind down of the Debtors' business and
financial affairs), and priority tax claims.  By agreement with the
Internal Revenue Service the unmatured priority tax claim of the
IRS will be settled at a 25% discount. These administrative and
priority tax claims will be paid on the Effective Date or such
later date as they become allowed or due and payable in the
ordinary course.

After payment of all these claims and distributions to general
unsecured creditors, all other bankruptcy estate funds will be paid
to the Senior Secured Lenders for their first-priority security
interest in all of the Debtors' assets. The Senior Secured Lenders
have waived their right to receive a distribution for their
deficiency claims on the Senior Secured Lenders' Claim and
Subordinated Secured Lender Claim. The Senior Secured Lenders would
have been entitled to receive (on account of their deficiency
claims) more than 95% of the $250,000 pool for the allowed general
unsecured claims under the Plan absent the waiver.

The amount available to the Senior Secured Lenders consisting of
proceeds from the liquidation of the Debtors' assets, after the
payment of wind-down expenses, shall be subject to these carve-out
amounts:

* $250,000, to fund distributions to the Debtors' general unsecured
creditors; and

* $634,609, to be paid on the Effective Date of the Plan to the IRS
in full satisfaction of the IRS's claim for employment-related
taxes deferred under the CARES Act.

Prior to the filing of the Plan, the Debtors have already
effectuated the liquidation of a substantial portion of their
assets through two asset sales:

(i) the sale of substantially all of the assets of Futures to FBTC
Transitional Sub, LLC, which closed on April 5, 2021; and
(ii) the sale of substantially all of the assets of South Bay (and
certain of the assets of CIS) to SB Transitional Sub, LLC.
Each of the purchasers is a special purpose entity formed and
controlled by The Mentor Network, a Boston-based provider of
behavioral health services.

Holders of the Debtors' equity interests will not receive any
distributions on account of such equity interests, which will
be extinguished under the terms of the Plan.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available for free at
https://bit.ly/3eQbiof from PacerMonitor.com.


                   About Community Intervention
                          Services, Inc.

Community Intervention Services, Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 21-40002-EDK).  The case is being jointly
administered with the bankruptcy cases of its affiliates Community
Intervention Services Holdings, Inc., Futures Behavior Therapy
Center, LLC, and South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.




CYPRUS MINES: Tort Claimants Cannot Alter Ch.11 Committee Makeup
----------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that a Delaware bankruptcy judge Tuesday, May 19,
2021, denied a request by a group of talc personal injury claimants
to change the makeup of the tort claimants committee in Cyprus
Mines Corp.'s Chapter 11, saying she did not see any conflicts of
interest involving its current members.

While U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein expressed
concern that committee members may be delegating their
responsibilities to their counsel, the fact that those attorneys
also represent parties involved in the creation of a settlement
with Cyprus parent Imerys Talc America does not in and of itself
create a conflict of interest, she ruled.

                 About Cyprus Mines Corporation

Cyprus Mines Corporation is a Delaware corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Cyprus Amax Minerals Co., which is an
indirect subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan Inc. It currently has
relatively limited business operations, which include the ownership
of various parcels of real property, certain royalty interests that
generate de minimis revenue (e.g., less than $1,500 in each of the
past two calendar years), and the ownership of an operating
subsidiary that conducts marketing activities.

Cyprus Mines is a predecessor in interest of Imerys Talc America,
Inc. In June 1992, Cyprus Mines sold its talc-related assets to RTZ
America Inc. (later known as Rio Tinto America, Inc.) through a
two-step process. First, Cyprus Mines transferred its talc-related
assets and liabilities (subject to minor exceptions) to Cyprus Talc
Corporation, a newly formed subsidiary of Cyprus Mines, pursuant to
an Agreement of Transfer and Assumption, dated June 5, 1992.
Second, Cyprus Mines sold the stock of Cyprus Talc Corporation to
RTZ pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, also dated June 5, 1992
(as amended, the "1992 SPA"). The purchase price was approximately
$79.5 million.  Cyprus Talc Corporation was later renamed Imerys
Talc America, Inc.  By virtue of the 1992 ATA, the entity now named
Imerys expressly and broadly assumed the talc liabilities of Cyprus
Mines and its former subsidiaries that were in the talc business.

Cyprus Mines filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 21-10398) on Feb. 11, 2021, listing between $10
million and $50 million in assets, and between $1 million and $10
million in liabilities.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtor tapped Reed Smith LLP, led by Kurt F. Gwynne, Esq., as
bankruptcy counsel; Kasowitz Benson Torres, LLP as special
conflicts counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims agent.

James L. Patton, Jr. was appointed as the future claimants'
representative in the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.  The FCR tapped
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as his bankruptcy counsel and
Gilbert, LLP as his special insurance counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Regions 3 and 9 appointed an official
committee of tort claimants on March 4, 2021.  The tort committee
is represented by Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered and Campbell &
Levine, LLC.  Province, LLC serves as the tort committee's
financial advisor.


DT MIDSTREAM: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'BB+' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned DT Midstream, Inc. (DTM) a first time
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'BB+'. In addition, Fitch
has assigned 'BBB-'/'RR1' ratings (recovery of 91%-100%) to the
senior secured term loan and 'BB+'/'RR4' ratings (recovery of
31%-50%) to the senior unsecured notes. The Outlook is Stable.

The rating reflects DTM's low leverage, long term contracts
assuring stable cash flows and credit protections for lower rated
counterparties. Fitch expects revenues to be fairly stable over the
next few years given minimum volume commitments (MVC) and demand
charges, which were 90% of 2020 revenues. Importantly, the rating
also reflects the step down of the cash flow assurances each year
and risks associated with customer concentration. DTM's exposure to
low rated counterparties is a limiting factor for the rating.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Scale and Scope of Operations: DTM's ratings reflect the benefits
of two business segments in two different producing basins, the
Marcellus/Utica and the Haynesville and its size and scale. Fitch
estimates that approximately 54% of 2020's adjusted EBITDA was from
the gathering segment and 26% from the pipeline segment. The
remaining 20% was from cash distributions from joint ventures from
four different pipeline systems. DTM has fee-based contracts with a
weighted average contract life of approximately nine years.

Conservative Credit Profile: On a pro forma basis, Fitch expects YE
2021 leverage of 4.5x to 4.8x through the 2024 forecast period.
With a fully operational system, capex is expected to be manageable
and leverage remains within this band. Fitch forecasts DTM to be
free cash flow positive, although the company may direct cash
toward growth opportunities, for shareholder returns (e.g. dividend
increases or share repurchases), or debt reduction.

MVCs and Demand Charges: In 2020, 99% of revenues were fee based,
and significantly about 90% came from MVCs/demand charges. While
the agreements have a significant amount of cash flow assurances in
the near term from the MVCs/demand charges, those will step down
over time, increasing cash flow volatility.

Diverse Assets and Customers: Fitch views DTM's diversity
favorably. The company's assets are located in the Marcellus/Utica
and Haynesville basins. In 2021, DTM expects approximately 61% of
revenues (including proportional revenues from joint ventures) from
the Marcellus/Utica and 34% from the Haynesville. The remaining 5%
is located outside of these regions. DTM's focus is on dry gas and
its transportation to the northeast and Gulf Coast, with smaller
amounts delivered to the midwest and eastern Canada. Customers
include producers (51% of revenues including proportional revenues
from joint ventures), LDCs & utilities (25%), interstate pipelines
(7%) and other (17%), largely gas marketers.

Counterparty Exposure/Customer Concentration: Fitch views the
significant concentration in high yield customers as credit
concerns. In 2020, Indigo Natural Resources (Indigo, NR) generated
26% of revenues, followed by Southwestern Energy (SWN; BB/Stable)
at 24% and Antero Resources with 8%. All three are high yield.
Indigo's share of revenues will increase in 2021 as the Louisiana
Energy Access Pipeline (LEAP) pipeline system grows revenues during
its first full year of operations. To mitigate counterparty risk,
customers have credit enhancements in place. In recent history, DTM
has only had one customer declare bankruptcy and it did not have an
impact on cash flows.

Marcellus/Utica Assets: In the Appalachian basin, DTM's significant
customer is Southwestern Energy which has substantial acreage
dedications for the life of the reserves. DTM gathers approximately
two-thirds of SWN's dry gas in the region. Dry gas moves on the
Susquehanna Gathering System's 193 miles of pipeline and has
capacity of 1.4 bcf/d. These assets are in SWN's Northeast
Appalachia segment, which is not SWN's growth region for 2021
compared to its Southwest Appalachia segment.

Haynesville Assets: DTM grew in size and scale with the December
2019 acquisition of the Haynesville assets for approximately $2.7
billion. It acquired a gathering system, Blue Union, and a 150 mile
lateral pipeline that was under construction. The pipeline, the
LEAP, went into service in August 2020. DTM also received long-term
MVCs/demand charge agreements with its now largest counterparty,
Indigo, a large private producer with the acquisition. DTM moves
gas from the Haynesville on the LEAP lateral to the Gulf Coast to
petrochemical customers, refining facilities, power plants and LNG
facilities.

Pipeline JVs add Stability: DTM received cash distributions from
four pipelines, totalling approximately 20% of adjusted 2020
EBITDA. Fitch adds these distributions to its adjusted EBITDA. The
company's most notable pipeline stakes include Millennium (26.25%
ownership stake), Vector (40%), and NEXUS (50%). These JV stakes
provide DTM with additional diversity and stable cash flows from
long term contracts. Fitch views these pipelines favorably given
the regulatory issues facing construction of new pipelines,
particularly in the northeast.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

DTM is the midstream segment that is being spun out of DTE Energy
Company (DTE; IDR BBB/Stable). It is a platform of about 1,000-mile
system of gathering pipelines and 1,200 miles of pipeline assets
that connect key markets in the midwest U.S., eastern Canada,
northeast U.S. and Gulf Coast regions to production in the largest
and most economic dry gas basins in the United States, the
Marcellus/Utica and Haynesville Basins.

DTM is rated two notches below The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB;
BBB). The two-notch rating differential is warranted given WMB's
much larger size, scale and diversity. WMB generates six times more
EBITDA than DTM. Both companies generate approximately half of
their cash flows from gathering while the rest comes from
pipelines. In the gathering segment, DTM benefits from having most
of its revenues from MVCs while WMB has almost none.

Fitch expects WMB to have YE 2021 leverage of approximately 4.7x
whereas DTM is forecasted to be 4.5x to 4.8x. Lastly, WMB has
operations throughout the U.S. and slightly over half are
investment grade counterparties while DTM has assets in two
producing basins largely with high yield customers.

Enable Midstream (Enable; BBB-) is rated one notch higher, before
it agreed to be acquired by Energy Transfer LP (ET; BBB-). The
comparison of Enable to DTM is reasonable if Enable is considered
on a standalone basis (before it agreed to be acquired).
Historically, Enable operated with leverage below 4.0x which was a
large driver for its historical rating. Leverage has increased in
recent history due to its concentrated position in the SCOOP and
STACK and has faced headwinds.

While Enable has assets largely concentrated in one region, it has
a diverse set of customers that are primarily investment grade.
Enable generates approximately 67% of gross margins from gathering
and processing and the remaining is from transportation and storage
whereas DTM derives 51% of its EBITDA from gathering and the
balance from pipelines. In terms of EBITDA, Enable is more than 50%
larger.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

-- A Fitch price deck of Henry Hub natural gas prices of $2.75
    per thousand cubic feet (mcf) in 2021; 2.45 in 2022 and over
    the long-term and West Texas Intermediate oil prices of $55
    per barrel (bbl) in 2021, $50/bbl in 2022 and $50/bbl in 2023;

-- Revenues have low mid-single digit growth in the forecast
    period;

-- After significant capital spending in 2020 on a pro forma
    basis, it drops significantly in 2021 to a range of $250
    million to $300 million;

-- The company generate positive free cash flow (which may be
    directed for additional capex, returns for shareholders, or
    debt reduction);

-- The secured instruments are secured by a perfected first
    priority lien on substantially all assets of the borrowers and
    guarantors.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Leverage (total debt with equity credit to operating EBITDA)
    at or below 4.0x on a sustained basis;

-- Improvement in the credit quality and concentration of the
    major counterparties.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Leverage (total debt with equity credit to operating EBITDA)
    be at or above 5.0x on a sustained basis;

-- A significant decline in MVCs/demand charges beyond Fitch's
    forecast period may require lower leverage for ratings to
    remain unchanged.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity Expected: As of Dec. 31, 2020 DTM, had $42
million of cash on the balance sheet. Fitch believes the addition
of a $750 million revolver provides DTM with sufficient liquidity
through the forecast period.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch typically adjusts midstream energy companies' EBITDA to
exclude equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates and
includes cash distributions from unconsolidated affiliates. Fitch
removes distributions to non-controlling interests from DTM's
EBITDA.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


DT MIDSTREAM: Moody's Assigns First Time 'Ba1' Corp Family Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first-time ratings to DT
Midstream, Inc., including a Ba1 Corporate Family Rating, Ba1-PD
Probability of Default Rating, Baa2 rating to its proposed $750
million senior secured revolving credit facility maturing in 2026,
Baa2 rating to its proposed $1 billion senior secured term loan
maturing in 2028, Ba2 rating to its proposed $2.1 billion senior
unsecured notes and SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating. The
rating outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the new term loan and notes issuance will be used to
make a payment to DTE Energy Company (DTE, Baa2 stable) in
connection with DT Midstream's spin-off. Moody's ratings are
subject to review of all final documentation.

DTE's Board of Directors had authorized its management to pursue a
plan to spin-off DT Midstream, comprising its midstream business.
The separation is expected to be completed around mid-year 2021,
subject to final approval by DTE's Board of Directors, regulatory
approvals, and satisfaction of other conditions. DTE shareholder
approval is not required to effect the separation transaction.

"DT Midstream's ratings reflect its diversified and integrated
asset base, moderate leverage and sound expected distribution
coverage," said Amol Joshi, Moody's Vice President and Senior
Credit Officer. "However, DTM's ratings are constrained by its
limited scale, with the majority of its revenue from non-investment
grade counterparties."

Assignments:

Issuer: DT Midstream, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned Ba1

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned Ba1-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-2

Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned Baa2
(LGD2)

Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, Assigned Baa2 (LGD2)

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned Ba2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: DT Midstream, Inc.

Outlook, Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

DTM's Ba1 CFR reflects the benefit from fee-based revenue with no
direct commodity price exposure, and long-term contracts
underpinned by pipeline demand charges, minimum volume commitments
(MVCs) and acreage dedications providing volume and cash flow
visibility over the next several years. The company has moderate
leverage and targets long-term total leverage below 4x. DTM also
targets a dividend distribution coverage above 2x, and its ability
to generate significant excess cash should support growth spending
or repaying its pre-payable term loan debt. The company has an
integrated mix of pipeline, storage and gathering assets that
connect the prolific Appalachian and Haynesville dry gas supply
basins to key demand markets, with a diverse customer base
comprising natural gas local distribution companies, power
generators, industrials, producers and marketers.

DTM's strengths are partially offset by its limited size and scale
relative to some of its peers, with natural gas gathering assets
comprising almost 50% of cash flow. While contractual features and
credit enhancements mitigate DTM's counterparty risk, the majority
of its revenue is from non-investment grade counterparties. The
rating is also restrained by DTM's limited track record as an
independent company. While the company operates many assets,
non-operated pipeline assets exceed 20% of expected cash flow. DTM
has so far operated as a sizeable utility company's segment,
benefitting from DTE's strong credit profile. Spinning-off DTM into
an independent company could result in dis-synergies and additional
costs. DTM's new board of directors could also result in
uncertainty regarding items such as corporate strategy, leverage
policy, capital allocation, along with the inherent execution risks
involved in a transaction of this size.

DTM's secured revolver and term loan are both rated Baa2, two
notches above the Ba1 CFR, reflecting their first priority lien and
supported by $2.1 billion of junior debt cushion. DTM's $2.1
billion of senior unsecured notes are rated Ba2, one notch below
the Ba1 CFR, given the significant amount of secured debt in DTM's
pro forma capital structure.

DTM should maintain good liquidity through 2022 as reflected in its
SGL-2 rating. DTM should have a modest cash balance and an undrawn
$750 million revolver at spin-off. The revolver will have financial
covenants including a maximum consolidated net leverage ratio of 5x
and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.5x. The term loan will
be governed by a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.1x.
Moody's expects the company to be in compliance with these
covenants through 2022. The company should generate excess cash
flow upon satisfying its capital spending and dividend distribution
needs, which will likely be used to support growth projects or
repay its pre-payable term loan debt.

The stable rating outlook reflects DTM's moderate leverage
underpinned by long-term contracts and cash flow visibility.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

DT Midstream's ratings could be upgraded if the company
meaningfully increases its size and scale, achieves debt to EBITDA
comfortably below 4x, maintains sound distribution coverage and
simplifies its debt structure, while improving its counterparty
risk profile and asset quality.

DT Midstream's ratings could be downgraded if debt to EBITDA
approaches 5x, distribution coverage significantly weakens, or
there is meaningful deterioration in asset quality or counterparty
risk profile. DT Midstream's ratings could also be downgraded if
there is a significant increase in debt to fund a sizable
acquisition, or shareholder friendly actions materially hurt the
company's leverage.

Headquartered in Detroit, Michigan, DT Midstream, Inc. is an owner,
operator and developer of an integrated portfolio of natural gas
interstate pipelines, intrastate pipelines, storage systems,
gathering lateral pipelines, gathering systems, treatment plants
and compression and surface facilities.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Midstream
Energy published in December 2018.


EASTERDAYS FARMS: Sued for Loan Default on Potato,Onion Facilities
------------------------------------------------------------------
Kristin M. Kraemer of Tri-City Herald reports that the day after
the patriarch of one of Washington's largest agriculture operations
died in a head-on crash in December 2020, four of his family's
commercial properties went into default.

Rabo AgriFinance wants its money back, and is asking a federal
court to foreclose on the Franklin County properties and order Gale
Easterday's widow, two of his children and a daughter-in-law to pay
up.

The properties are large onion and potato packing and storage
facilities in Pasco and Basin City.

Within two months, the nearly $1 million line-of-credit loan had
racked up $58,000 in unpaid interest on the contract and the
default.  And in the three months since, it has continued to accrue
interest of about $580 daily at a 21% rate.

The international agricultural lender Rabo AgriFinance filed has
filed a new lawsuit in U.S. District Court against 3E Properties,
along with Karen Easterday, Debby and Cody Easterday and Jody
Easterday.

Karen, Debby and Cody Easterday all are general partners of
Easterday Farms, and Jody Easterday and husband Andrew H. Wills
have interest in the mortgaged properties, the suit says.

"The loan is in default and has not been paid," the lender said in
its April 21 filing for breach of the loan agreement.

The complaint further states that Easterday Farms could not be
included as a defendant in this civil action because of a stay in
place since Easterday Farms filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition
on Feb. 8, 2021.

However, that bankruptcy filing by one-half of the Easterday
conglomerate "was a separate and independent default" under the
loan agreement. The first was Gale Easterday's Dec. 10, 2020
death.

The Easterday family, and its farming and ranching operations, have
been mired in legal troubles for nearly four months.

In January 2021, Tyson Foods sued in Franklin County Superior Court
accusing Easterday Ranches of bilking the meat processor out of
more than $225 million by charging for buying and feeding of
200,000 cattle that never existed.

That was followed by the first of two Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings
by the Mesa-based family in federal court.

The cattle ranch listed debts of just under $237 million to its top
20 creditors.
Then, the farming side filed for its own bankruptcy protection,
showing debts of nearly $18 million to its top 20 creditors.

CRIMINAL CASE

In March 2021, Cody Easterday — president and chief executive
officer of the family's companies — admitting concocting the
scheme to defraud Tyson and another company in what federal
prosecutors have dubbed a "ghost-cattle scam."

The total loss was more than $244 million. The money was used to
offset about $200 million lost in commodity futures contracts
trading.

Easterday, 49, faces up to 20 years in prison for his guilty plea
to one count of wire fraud, and must pay full restitution for the
money he stole.

Sentencing is set Aug. 4, 2021.

He has been ordered not to leave the state of Washington in the
interim, and had to surrender his passport to the U.S. Probation
Office.

But last week, Easterday got permission from a judge to travel to
the Boise area from May 16-22. 2021 for the birth of a grandchild.

FAMILY HISTORY

The family's operations started in the late 1950s when Ervin
Easterday moved from Idaho to farm in the new Columbia Basin
Reclamation Irrigation project.

Gale Easterday eventually took over for his dad, and worked with
wife Karen and their five children on their different properties
throughout Eastern Washington.

Last December 2020, the 79-year-old died when he drove the wrong
way on Interstate 182 in Pasco. His pickup hit head-on with an
Easterday potato truck.

Easterday Farms has an office in downtown Pasco.

According to the recent lawsuit filing by Rabo, Gale Easterday's
death "resulted in an Event of Default" under the terms of their
credit and loan agreements.

The mortgage on the first two properties — 5235 Industrial Way
along Highway 395 in north Pasco and 1427 N. First Ave. in downtown
— were included in a credit loan agreement with Rabo in 2009.

The mortgage on the other two properties — 90 and 110 Pillsbury
Road in Basin City — then was added into a master credit
agreement in 2018.

Cody Easterday and Easterday Farms then did a "QuickLine Credit
Application and Account Agreement" with Rabo in March 2020.

The complaint states that as of Feb. 8, 2021 — two months after
Gale Easterday’s death — the loan amount had grown to
$1,053,245 in principal and interest.

The case has been assigned to Chief Judge Stanley A. Bastian, who
also is presiding over Cody Easterday's criminal case.

No trial date has been set in the civil case.

             About Easterday Ranches and Easterday Farms

Easterday Ranches, Inc. is a privately held company in the cattle
ranching and farming business.  

Easterday Ranches sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 21-00141) on Feb. 1,
2021. Its affiliate, Easterday Farms, a Washington general
partnership, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.
Wash. Case No. 21-00176) on Feb. 8, 2021. The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 21-00141.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between
$100 million and $500 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Whitman L. Holt oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their lead
bankruptcy counsel, Bush Kornfeld LLP as local counsel, and Davis
Wright Tremaine LLP as special counsel. T. Scott Avila and Peter
Richter of Paladin Management Group serve as restructuring
officers.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 18 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 16, 2021.


ELECTROMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES: Incurs $2.6M Net Loss in 1st Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Electromedical Technologies, Inc. filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $2.56 million on $166,440 of net sales for the three
months ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $451,241 on
$214,870 of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $1.69 million in total
assets, $3.47 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $1.78 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the Company's cash
and cash equivalents increased by $315,861 reflecting net proceeds
from financing activities of $643,098 partially offset by cash used
in operations of $327,237.  At March 31, 2021 the Company had a
working capital deficit of $1,826,511 and cash on hand of $580,774.
Working capital deficit totaled $224,579 excluding derivative
liabilities - convertible notes-payable of $1,601,932. During the
three months ended March 31, 2020, its cash and cash equivalents
increased by $38,881, reflecting cash provided by operations of
$699 and cash provided by financing activities of $38,182.

Cash flows used in operating activities totaled $327,237 for the
three months ended March 31, 2021 as compared to cash flows
provided of $699 for the three months ended March 31, 2020.  The
increase in cash flows used in operating activities is primarily
the result of an increase in inventory purchases, a reduction in
accounts payable and an increase in the loss from operations
impacted by increased costs related to public Company operations
and a decrease in gross profit.

Cash flows provided by financing activities totaled $643,098 for
the three months ended March 31, 2021 as compared to $38,182 for
the three months ended March 31,2020.  The cash flows provided in
the 2021 period are primarily the result of $712,500 in net
proceeds from convertible promissory notes partially offset by debt
repayments totaling $62,846.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1715819/000110465921066713/tm2111751d1_10q.htm

                 About Electromedical Technologies

Scottsdale, AZ-based Electromedical Technologies, Inc. is a
bioelectronics manufacturing and marketing company.  The Company
offers U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cleared medical
devices for pain management.  Bioelectronics is a developing field
of "electronic" medicine, which uses electrical impulses over the
body's neural circuitry to try to alleviate pain, without drugs.

Electromedical reported a net loss of $3.87 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $1.74 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$1.42 million in total assets, $2.73 million in total liabilities,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.32 million.

San Diego, California-based dbbmckennon, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated March 30, 2021, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has a negative working capital
balance, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


ENCORE CAPITAL: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'Ba2' CFR to Positive
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the Ba2 corporate family rating
of Encore Capital Group, Inc. and the Ba3 guaranteed senior secured
debt rating. Concurrently, the issuer outlook has been changed to
positive from stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

AFFIRMATION OF RATINGS REFLECTS RESILIENCE OF ENCORE'S FRANCHISE

The affirmation of the Ba2 CFR reflects Encore's demonstrated
resilience of its global franchise, as evidenced by the company's
strong financial performance since the onset of the coronavirus
pandemic.

The strength of Encore's performance has been underpinned by higher
than expected cash collections in the United States (US) where
borrowers in distress benefitted from a number of direct stimulus
measures taken by the US government in response to the coronavirus
pandemic. Higher than expected collections in the US helped to
offset lower than budgeted collections in Europe. Strong
collections activity boosted the company's profitability, cash
flows and capitalisation and resulted in moderate deleveraging,
with Moody's calculated Debt to EBITDA ratio for the trailing
twelve months ending March 31, 2021 declining to 2.3x from 2.5x at
year-end 2020 and 2.8x at year-end 2019. During the same time,
Encore strengthened its liquidity by extending maturities of its
term debt by replacing its senior secured notes due in 2023 and
2024 with the new notes maturing in 2026 and 2028.

The Ba2 CFR also reflects Encore's relatively long track record,
with more than 20 years of operating performance; but at the same
time, regulatory risk inherent to the debt collection business,
particularly in the US.

The affirmation of the Ba3 rating of Encore's and Cabot Financial
(Luxembourg) S.A's guaranteed senior secured notes is based on
Encore's Ba2 CFR and reflects the application of Moody's Loss Given
Default for Speculative-Grade Companies methodology, published in
December 2015, and the priorities of claims and asset coverage in
Encore's liability structure.

OUTLOOK CHANGED TO POSITIVE

By changing the outlook on Encore to positive, Moody's acknowledged
upward rating pressure due to the recent strengthening of Encore's
credit profile, provided deleveraging, improved capitalisation and
profitability prove sustainable over the next 12-18 months. At the
same time, Moody's expects some moderation in Encore's
profitability and cash flow metrics as government support measures
in the US expire or are reduced. The lower supply of non-performing
loan portfolios, which has been caused by reduced consumer
delinquencies and charge-offs during the pandemic on the back of
direct stimulus measures, will likely reduce the company's future
profitability in the short to medium term. In addition, the
progressive recovery of the economy and expected rebound in
consumption and spending will likely lead to higher delinquencies
and a drop in collections, but will also in due course increase a
supply of non-performing loans.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Encore's CFR could be upgraded if the company: 1) continues to
demonstrate strong financial performance, with consistently solid
profitability and cash flows; 2) maintains its Debt/EBITDA
leverage, on a consistent basis, at less than 2.5x, as calculated
by Moody's; 3) diversifies its geographical mix, which would reduce
its exposure to the regulatory risk in a given region; and 4) if
Moody's deems that the operating environment for debt purchasers
has improved.

The outlook could return to stable if: 1) Encore fails to secure
the amount of portfolio purchases necessary to sustain its
profitability at pre-pandemic levels; 2) its collections drop
meaningfully relative to pre-pandemic levels; or 3) Encore's
Debt/EBITDA leverage increases, on a sustained basis, to the upper
end of the range of its leverage target of 2x- 3x, as calculated by
the company on the basis of net debt to EBITDA.

Encore's CFR could be downgraded in case of: 1) meaningful and
sustained deterioration in the company's profitability and cash
flows; 2) increase in leverage, on a sustained basis, to above
3.5x, measured as Debt/EBITDA, as calculated by Moody's; 3) failure
to maintain adequate committed revolving borrowing availability, or
if liquidity otherwise materially weakens; or 4) regulatory
developments in a country to which the company has significant
business exposure that would have significant negative impact on
the company's franchise.

A change in the CFR would lead to a similar upward or downward
change of the senior secured debt rating. Further, the senior
secured debt rating could be upgraded with changes to the liability
structure that would decrease the amount of debt considered senior
to the notes or increase the amount of debt considered junior to
the notes. The debt rating could be downgraded if the amount of
debt considered senior to the notes increases.

LIST OF AFFECTED RATINGS

Issuer: Encore Capital Group, Inc.

Affirmations:

Long-term Corporate Family Rating, affirmed Ba2

Backed Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, affirmed Ba3

Outlook Action:

Outlook changed to Positive from Stable

Issuer: Cabot Financial (Luxembourg) S.A

Affirmation:

Backed Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, affirmed Ba3

Outlook Action:

Outlook changed to Positive from Stable

PRINCIPAL METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Finance
Companies Methodology published in November 2019.


ENERGY TRANSFER: Moody's Affirms Ba2 Preferred Stock Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has changed Energy Transfer LP's (ET)
outlook to stable from negative. Moody's also affirmed ET's Baa3
senior unsecured notes, its Ba1 junior subordinated notes rating,
its Ba2 Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred ratings and its
P-3 short term rating. Moody's has also changed the outlook for
Enable Midstream Partners, LP (ENBL) to stable from negative while
affirming its Baa3 senior unsecured notes rating. ET's pending
acquisition of ENBL is expected to close in the second half of
2021.

The outlook actions reflect the prospects for an acceleration in
debt reduction and improved leverage metrics following ET's posting
of very strong first quarter 2021 financial results and using the
free cash flow generated by this performance to repay $3.7 billion
of debt during the quarter..

"While fully recognizing that 2021's first quarter results were
inflated by outsized one-time gains associated with the response of
ET's Texas intrastate transportation and storage asset base to the
winter storm Uri disruption, Moody's was encouraged that ET
deployed the quarter's excess liquidity into debt reduction,"
commented Andrew Brooks, Moody's Vice President. "Moody's remains
concerned with the possible interruption or loss of cash
distributions from ET's ownership stake in the Dakota Access
Pipeline (DAPL), which remains mired in litigation; however, the
magnitude of this potential loss is blunted to an extent by ET's
improved profitability together with the pending closure of its
acquisition of Enable Midstream Partners, LP and its contribution
to future consolidated EBITDA."

Affirmations:

Issuer: Enable Midstream Partners, LP

Senior Unsecured Shelf, Affirmed (P)Baa3

Commercial Paper, Affirmed P-3

Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Baa3

Issuer: Energy Transfer LP

Issuer Rating, Affirmed Baa3

Junior Subordinated Notes, Affirmed Ba1

Pref. Stock, Affirmed Ba2

Commercial Paper, Affirmed P-3

Senior Unsecured Notes, Affirmed Baa3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Enable Midstream Partners, LP

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Issuer: Energy Transfer LP

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

ET's ratings are supported by its very large consolidated and
geographically diversified asset base comprised of crude oil,
natural gas and natural gas liquids pipeline services and storage,
and largely fee-based natural gas midstream gathering and
processing operations. ET, though its operating subsidiaries, ranks
among the largest publicly traded midstream master limited
partnerships (MLP) in terms of its size, geographic reach and the
operational diversification of its businesses. ET also holds the
general partnership interest and common units in Sunoco LP (SUN,
Ba3 positive) and USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC, B1 stable),
further adding to overall operational diversity. ET's $96 billion
midstream asset base generates a largely fee-based cash flow
stream. It produced first quarter 2021 EBITDA of $5.04 billion, of
which approximately $2.4 billion was attributable to the
optimization of its operations during winter storm Uri.

Adjusting for the one-time impact of Uri, ET saw its once robust
base EBITDA growth flatten in 2020 under the pressure of pandemic
influenced upstream energy market weakness combined with fewer
midstream growth opportunities. As a result, leverage on a
proportionately consolidated basis increased to 5.6x at year-end.
Following its first quarter results, ET has upped 2021's reported
EBITDA guidance to a range of $12.9 to $13.3 billion (excluding the
pending merger of ENBL). Reflecting as much as $5 billion of debt
reduction in 2021 ($3.7 billion was repaid in the first quarter),
Moody's expects debt/EBITDA to drop below 4.5x for the year.
However, returning to a more normalized EBITDA performance in 2022
(which Moody's is conservatively projecting to evidence little
growth from 2021's base level), it is likely that debt/EBITDA will
still fall below 5x, helped by 2021's accelerated debt repayment.
October 2020's 50% distribution cut, which internalized
approximately $1.6 billion of cash flow, supplemented by
significant reductions in projected capital spending, should enable
ET to generate modestly positive free cash flow into 2022 and
beyond, further supporting debt reduction and a trajectory towards
ET's stated target of achieving a 4.5x minimum adjusted
debt/EBITDA. Moody's recognizes, however, that in a still somewhat
uncertain energy operating environment even generating flat EBITDA
entails execution risk, notwithstanding the enhanced value that
winter storm Uri has ascribed to ET's storage and transportation
assets.

Regulatory, permitting and political risk for major energy
infrastructure projects has been on the rise. The cost of project
delays is borne by project owners, ultimately detracting from
project returns and delaying receipt of cash flow associated with
these investments. Uncertainty continues to plague the operation of
DAPL (Midwest Connector Capital Company LLC, Baa2 negative) as it
continues to confront litigation on several fronts. ET operates
DAPL and maintains a 38.3% ownership position in the pipeline.

The MLP structure employed by ET vests considerable influence with
the general partner of these entities, whose operations are subject
to boards of directors appointed by their respective general
partners. MLP limited partner unitholders have considerably fewer
voting rights than shareholders in a conventional corporate
structure, further restricting their influence over MLP
governance.

Moody's views ET to be in a good liquidity position into 2022,
enhanced by strong earnings retention, which Moody's assumes will
fund the repayment of debt. On March 5, ET redeemed 2021's $1.4
billion of maturing notes in cash. ET has $3.05 billion of
scheduled debt maturities in 2022. ET has guided 2021's growth
capital spending of $1.65 billion, down almost 50% from 2020's
$3.05 billion, with further spending declines projected for 2022
and beyond. At March 31, $800 million was utilized under ET's $6.0
billion credit facilities, all of which was in commercial paper.
Its $5.0 billion revolving credit facility has a December 1, 2024
scheduled maturity date, and is supplemented by a $1.0 billion
364-day credit facility, scheduled to mature in November. The
364-day facility had no borrowings outstanding. ET has a history of
consistent support for its investment grade rating, which Moody's
expects will continue to be the case.

The outlook is stable reflecting an anticipated trajectory of debt
reduction.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be upgraded if debt/EBITDA (proportionately
consolidated) drops below 4.5x with strong distribution coverage
remaining intact. ET's rating could be downgraded should
debt/EBITDA return to and remain above 5x.

Energy Transfer LP is headquartered in Dallas, Texas, and owns and
operates a broad array of midstream energy assets.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Midstream
Energy published in December 2018.


ESCALON MEDICAL: Incurs $137,465 Net Loss in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------
Escalon Medical Corp. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $137,465 on $2.32 million of net revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $127,883 on $2.36
million of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $235,542 on $7.64 million of net revenues compared to a
net loss of $181,853 on $7.39 million of net revenues for the nine
months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $5.58 million in total
assets, $4.30 million in total liabilities, and $1.28 million in
total shareholders' equity.

The Company's total cash on hand as of March 31, 2021 was
approximately $1,653,000 excluding restricted cash of approximately
$256,000 compared to approximately $826,000 of cash on hand and
restricted cash of $255,000 as of June 30, 2020.  Approximately
$48,000 was available under the Company's line of credit as of
March 31, 2021.  Because its operations have not historically
generated sufficient revenues to enable profitability, the Company
said it will continue to monitor costs and expenses closely and may
need to raise additional capital in order to fund operations.

Escalon said, "We expect to continue to fund operations from cash
on hand and through capital raising sources if possible and
available, which may be dilutive to existing stockholders, through
revenues from the licensing of our products, or through strategic
alliances.  Additionally, we may seek to sell additional equity or
debt securities through one or more discrete transactions, or enter
into a strategic alliance arrangement, but can provide no
assurances that any such financing or strategic alliance
arrangement will be available on acceptable terms, or at all.
Moreover, the incurrence of indebtedness in connection with a debt
financing would result in increased fixed obligations and could
contain covenants that would restrict our operations."

The Company further said, "As of March 31, 2021 we had an
accumulated deficit of approximately $69.1 million, incurred
recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from
operating activities in prior years.  These factors raise
substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going
concern, and our ability to generate cash to meet our cash
requirements for the following twelve months as of the date of this
form 10-Q."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/862668/000086266821000009/esmc-20210331.htm

                           About Escalon

Headquartered in Wayne, Pennsylvania, Escalon Medical Corp.
operates in the healthcare market, specializing in the development,
manufacture, marketing and distribution of medical devices for
ophthalmic applications.

Escalon Medical reported a net loss applicable to common
shareholders of $702,021 for the year ended June 30, 2020, compared
to a net loss applicable to common shareholders of $301,616 for the
year ended June 30, 2019.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company had
$5.72 million in total assets, $4.21 million in total liabilities,
and $1.51 million in total shareholders' equity.

Friedman LLP, in Marlton, New Jersey, the Company's auditor since
2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Sept. 28, 2020, citing that the Company's significant accumulated
deficit and recurring losses from operations and negative cash
flows from operating activities raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


FECK PROPERTIES: Martell Buying Englewood Property for $3.7-Mil.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Feck Properties, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 2504 N Beach Rd., in Englewood, Charlotte County,
Florida, together with incidental personalty located thereon, to
Robert Martell for $3.7 million, subject to higher and better
offers.

Pursuant to the Plan, the Debtor may sell any of its property, with
notice to all interested parties.

The Debtor has received an offer for the purchase of its FL
Property through the Contract.  The Purchaser is not an insider.
The sale will be free and clear of all liens, claims, and
interests, with all such liens, claims, and interests to attach to
the proceeds of sale.  The sale price is $ 3.7 million, "as-is,
where-is," with no warranties, except as to marketable title.

Commissions are to be paid at closing, whereupon the participating
brokers will split 6% in accordance with their respective
agreements, which are not subject to approval of the Court.  

Closing will occur no later than the 15th calendar day following
the date on which an Order Approving Sale is entered on the docket
of the Bankruptcy Court.

The Contract permits the Debtor to continue to accept reservations
and provides for a mechanism for the Buyer and the Debtor to
allocate income and expenses related to reservations after the
closing date.  

During the notice period, competing offers may be considered.

The Debtor is not transferring any personally identifiable
information in connection with the sale, except to the extent of
personally identifiable information of persons whose reservations
arise after closing.

The known lien holders are:

      a. Gina Hollis, first mortgagee, who will be paid the sum of
$2,058,999.39 at closing, which sum will be applied to principal,
with the remaining secured claim to attach to the proceeds of sale,
which proceeds will be held in escrow as will be agreed by the
parties or ordered by the Court.  Immediately upon resolution of
the objection to the claim of Ms. Hollis (either by agreement or
Order of the Court), any additional amounts allowed by the Court
will be disbursed from escrow.

      b. Outstanding real property taxes related to the FL
Property, including holders of tax certificates, will be paid in
full, at closing.

Pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and the Order Confirming
Plan, the deed transferring ownership of the FL Property, and the
mortgage of the purchaser will be exempt from transfer taxes as
provided by 11 U.S.C. Section 1146(a).

The Court will establish the amount of funds held in escrow for the
benefit of Ms. Hollis.  Net funds over and above the escrowed
amounts will be payable to the Debtor, deposited into the DIP
account, and distributed to creditors in accordance with the
provisions of the Plan.

A copy of the Contract is available at https://tinyurl.com/cu9u38uz
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                       About Feck Properties

Feck Properties is primarily engaged in real estate rentals
business in Florida and real estate development and sales business
in Massachusetts.

Feck Properties filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
20-05209) on July 7, 2020. In the petition signed by Stanley B.
Feck, manager, Debtor disclosed $4,750,000 in assets and
$2,773,630
in liabilities.  Kevin Christopher Gleason, Esq., at Florida
Bankruptcy Group, LLC represents Debtor as legal counsel.

The Debtor's Third Amended Plan of Reorganization was confirmed on

Dec. 14, 2020.



FLOAT HORIZEN: Wins Cash Collateral Access
------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee,
Nashville Division, has authorized Float Horizen, LLC to use cash
collateral on an interim basis to pay expenses in the ordinary
course of business.

The Debtor requires the use of cash collateral to continue present
business operations.

Pursuant to a Promissory Note entered into on December 20, 2016,
Pinnacle Bank loaned $441,200 to the Debtor. The Bank asserts that
the Debtor is truly and justly indebted to Bank in the amount of
$374,177 that includes principal of $371,544, accrued interest of
$2,283.85 as of October 6, 2020, and attorney's fees of $350 with
interest continuing to accrue at the per diem rate of $53.

The Bank further asserts the Debtor's obligations to Bank,
including the obligation to repay the Indebtedness, are secured by
unavoidable, valid and perfected liens and/or security interests in
certain assets of the Debtor. The Debtor currently does not have
any facts or basis to object to the validity, perfection, or
priority of the Bank's lien. To further secure the repayment of the
Indebtedness, the Debtor executed an Assignment of Deposit Account
and Security Agreement and a UCC Financing Statement was recorded
with the Tennessee Secretary of State as document number
426118426.

To secure the aggregate amount of all Cash Collateral used by the
Debtor and to secure any diminution in the value of the Bank's
interest in its Collateral, the Bank is granted, without need of
further act or documentation, a first priority replacement lien and
security interest under Sections 361(2) and 363(e) of the
Bankruptcy Code, on all of its Collateral and all collateral of the
same or similar type, and all proceeds, product, offspring, rents,
or profits thereof.

To the extent the liens and security interests granted the Order
prove insufficient to secure any diminution in value of the Bank's
interest in its Collateral the Bank is granted an administrative
priority claim pursuant to Section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to
secure any such diminution in value.

The security interests and liens of the Bank are created and
perfected without the necessity of the execution, filing or
recording of any documents otherwise required under bankruptcy or
non-bankruptcy law for the creation or perfection of security
interests and liens.

To adequately protect the Bank's lien from this ongoing diminution
in Collateral value, the Debtor has agreed to make an initial
Adequate Protection Payment of $1,000 upon entry of the order, and
then monthly payments in an amount to be determined at the Final
Hearing on Motion for Relief currently scheduled for May 4, 2021,
which will be made until such time as the Debtor either confirms a
Plan of Reorganization in the case and/or there is any modification
or termination of the provisions of the Agreed Order.

The Debtor will continue to maintain insurance with respect to all
Collateral for the purposes and in the amounts maintained by the
Debtor in accordance with the requirements of the Debtor's
agreements with the Bank.

A copy of the order is available for free at https://bit.ly/3yiS2Hu
from PacerMonitor.com.

                         About Float Horizen, LLC

Float Horizen, LLC, filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case no.
20-04478) on Oct. 6, 2020. In the petition signed by Robin Ritter,
chief manager. the Debtor estimated $50,000 in assets and $1
million to $10 million in liabilities.

Judge Randal S. Mashburn oversees the case.

Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz, PLLC  is the Debtor's counsel.

Pinnacle Bank, as Lender, is represented by:

     Matthew R. Murphy, Esq.
     David M. Smythe, Esq.
     Smythe Huff & Hayden, PC
     1222 16th Avenue South, Suite 301
     Nashville, TN 37212
     E-mail: mmurphy@smythehuff.com



FLUOR CORP: Equity Proceeds Use No Impact on Moody's Ba1 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service noted that Fluor Corporation's use of the
majority of the proceeds from its preferred equity issuance to
redeem debt is credit positive since it will likely result in a
material pay down of debt and interest cost savings even though it
will also lead to higher annual cash outflows. However, it will not
impact the company's ratings including its Ba1 corporate family
rating, Ba1-PD probability of default rating as well as the Ba1
rating on its senior unsecured debt. Its rating outlook remains
negative.

Fluor announced on May 12, 2021 that it intends to raise at least
$450 million from the offering of convertible preferred stock and
may raise about $67.5 million more since it has granted the
underwriter a 30-day option to purchase additional preferred shares
from the company. It plans to use the proceeds to redeem debt and
to cover premiums and for general corporate purposes. This will
result in a material debt paydown and annual interest savings, but
will also result in higher cash outflows since the dividend yield
on the preferred equity is likely to be higher than the interest on
the company's debt and the amount of preferred equity outstanding
will be higher than the amount of notes redeemed. Fluor currently
has three note issues outstanding with interest rates ranging from
1.75% to 4.25% and will have to pay a premium to retire this debt
since it is trading above par value.

Fluor's operating performance stabilized in 2020 as the company
focused on reducing costs and project risks and benefitted from
more effective execution on problem projects. It returned to
reporting consistently positive EBITDA, but its profit margins and
the absolute level of EBITDA generation remained at a very low
historical level. Therefore, the company generated only $350
million of adjusted EBITDA in 2020 and its credit metrics remained
weak for its rating with an adjusted leverage ratio (debt/EBITDA)
of 5.8x and interest coverage (EBITA/Interest) of only 2.1x.

Fluor's operating performance and credit metrics could strengthen
in 2021 if it continues to avoid unforeseen project issues, but its
operating risk profile remains elevated since it is somewhat
reliant on a few large projects. Also, Its recent project bidding
opportunities have been limited due to historically low commodity
prices and the economic uncertainty created by the coronavirus in
2020. Therefore, its credit metrics are likely to remain weak in
the near term.

Nevertheless, Fluor's bidding opportunities are likely to
strengthen as the economic recovery gains momentum and surging
commodity prices and potentially higher infrastructure spending
lead to increased project activity. This could result in higher
revenues and stronger operating earnings and credit metrics over
the next 12 to 18 months as the company benefits from further cost
reductions and incurs lower interest costs due to debt pay downs.
If Fluor's operating performance and credit metrics fail to
materially strengthen to a level that is commensurate with its Ba1
corporate family rating, including an adjusted leverage ratio
sustained above 3.5x and interest coverage below 4.0x, or it fails
to maintain a very strong liquidity profile then its rating could
be downgraded.

Headquartered in Irving, Texas, Fluor Corporation provides
engineering, procurement, construction and maintenance (EPCM)
services globally and is a large contractor to the US government.
Fluor generated $14.9 billion in revenues during the LTM period
ended March 31, 2021 and had a backlog of $23.8 billion.


FOSSIL GROUP: Incurs $24.4 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Fossil Group, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
attributable to the company of $24.44 million on $363.04 million of
net sales for the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2021, compared to a net
loss attributable to the company of $85.58 million on $390.72
million of net sales for the 14 weeks ended April 4, 2020.

As of April 3, 2021, the Company had $1.35 billion in total assets,
$507.23 million in total current liabilities, $433.06 million in
total long-term liabilities, and $408.82 million in total
stockholders' equity.

"We are pleased to start the year with better than expected sales
performance, which reflects improving consumer demand in the U.S.,
ongoing momentum in Mainland China and continued strength in our
digital channels globally," said Kosta Kartsotis, Chairman and CEO.
"We also delivered solid gross margins and cost control, which
resulted in improved profitability versus a year ago.  Notably, we
captured further organizational efficiencies in the first quarter,
allowing us to capture more than $50 million in cost savings and
achieve the financial targets under our $250 million New World
Fossil 2.0 program earlier than anticipated."

"While the COVID pandemic continues to disrupt certain markets, we
are encouraged by our outlook in large markets like the U.S. and
Mainland China, which are benefiting from the execution of our
digital strategy.  More broadly, we are pleased with our success in
transforming the business model, which has strengthened our digital
mix, significantly improved our cost structure and positions us to
drive increased growth and profitability over the long term."

Gross profit totaled $182.6 million compared to $140.4 million in
the first quarter of 2020, as the decrease in sales was more than
offset by an improved gross margin rate, which increased 1,440
basis points to 50.3%.  The year-over-year increase primarily
reflects reduced levels of inventory valuation adjustments and
minimum licensed product royalties, which were elevated due to the
onset of the COVID-19 global pandemic.  Also contributing to the
improved margin rate were favorable changes in channel, product and
region mix and favorable currency impacts of approximately 110
basis points, partially offset by higher freight costs.

Operating expenses totaled $199.4 million compared to $274.7
million a year ago.  Operating expenses in the first quarter of
2021 included $7.5 million of restructuring costs, primarily
related to employee costs, while operating expenses in the first
quarter of 2020 included $9.4 million of restructuring costs.
First quarter 2021 selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased on a year-over-year basis, reflecting lower compensation
and marketing costs and 12% fewer Company stores compared to a year
ago.  The 2021 first quarter included other long-lived asset
impairments of $4.5 million as compared to $17.1 million in the
2020 first quarter, reflecting a reduction in retail store
impairment in the current year.

First quarter 2021 operating loss was $16.8 million compared to an
operating loss of $134.3 million in the first quarter of 2020.

As of April 3, 2021, the Company had total liquidity of $250
million, comprised of $247 million of cash and cash equivalents and
$3 million of availability under its revolving credit facility.
Total debt was $195 million, including $138 million under its term
credit agreement.  Inventories at the end of the first quarter of
2021 totaled $322 million, a decrease of 27% versus a year ago,
primarily reflecting proactive management of inbound receipts to
align with consumer demand.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/883569/000088356921000021/fosl-20210403.htm

                        About Fossil Group

Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, Fossil Group, Inc. --
www.fossilgroup.com -- is a global design, marketing and
distribution company that specializes in consumer fashion
accessories.  The Company's principal offerings include an
extensive line of men's and women's fashion watches and jewelry,
handbags, small leather goods, belts, and sunglasses.  In the watch
and jewelry product categories, the Company have a diverse
portfolio of globally recognized owned and licensed brand names
under which its products are marketed.

Fossil Group reported a net loss of $95.94 million in 2020, a net
loss of $50.01 million in 2019, and a net loss of $938,000 in 2018.


G.A.F. SEELIG: Court OKs 2nd Amended Plan, Plan Administrator Named
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Elizabeth S. Stong confirmed the Second Amended Plan of
Liquidation of G.A.F. Seelig, Inc., and approved the Disclosure
Statement explaining that Plan, pursuant to separate rulings.
Judge Stong ruled that the Disclosure Statement contain adequate
information according to Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code.  

The Liquidation Plan, which shall have been substantially
consummated upon occurrence of the Effective Date, provided for the
appointment of Alan D. Halperin as Plan Administrator.  The Plan
Administrator shall make distributions for allowed administrative
expense claims, priority tax claims, professional fee claims,
priority WARN claim, priority non-tax claims, secured PACA claim
and Class 1 general unsecured claims in the order of their priority
in the plan.  Class 1 has voted to accept the Plan.

On or before the Effective Date, the Debtor shall establish and
maintain the Disputed Claims Reserve, pursuant to the Plan, which
shall be treated as a disputed ownership fund.

The Debtor shall automatically be deemed dissolved for all purposes
without the necessity for any further action upon entry of an order
closing the Chapter 11 Case.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement order is available for free at
https://bit.ly/3yo2jlN from PacerMonitor.com.

A copy of the confirmation order is available for free at
https://bit.ly/3hBwwYz from PacerMonitor.com.


                        About G.A.F. Seelig

Headquartered in Woodside, New York, G.A.F. Seelig, Inc., is a
family-owned company that distributes dairy products (skims, lo
fats, whole milk), creams, yogurts, juices, water, imported and
domestic cheeses, purees, raviolis and pastas, oils and vinegars,
chocolate and an ever expanding array of food service items.

G.A.F. Seelig, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 17-46968) on Dec. 30, 2017.  In the petition
signed by Rodney P. Seelig, president, the Debtor estimated assets
of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of the same range. The
Debtors tapped Michael L Moskowitz, Esq., at Weltman & Moskwitz,
LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; and MYC & Associates, Inc., as
auctioneer.


GDC TECHNICS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 7 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of GDC
Technics, LLC.

The committee members are:

     1. Kingslea Stringham

     2. TranStar Aircraft Interiors, LLC
        1184 Corporate Dr W.
        Arlington, TX 76006
        Attn: Danny Wintz
        Phone: 940-453-3527
        E-mail: Danny.wintz@dfwaircraft.com

     3. Agente Technical, LLC
        714 Centerpark Drive, Suite 140
        Colleyville, TX 76034
        Attn: Alexa Bui
        Phone: (817) 357-5555
        E-mail: Abui@agentetech.com

     4. PAC Seating Systems, Inc.
        3370 SW 42nd Ave.
        Palm City, FL 34990
        Attn: Chuck Tufano
        Phone: (678) 358-1036
        E-mail: tufano@pac-fl.com
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                        About GDC Technics

Headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas, GDC Technics LLC --
https://www.gdctechnics.com/ --  is a global aerospace company with
expertise in engineering and technical services, modifications,
electronic systems, R&D, and MRO services.

GDC Technics sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D.
Texas Lead Case No. 21-50484) on April 26, 2021.  CEO Brad Foreman
signed the petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had
between $10 million and $50 million in both assets and liabilities.
The case is handled by Judge Craig A. Gargotta.  

Wick Phillips Gould & Martin, LLP, led by Jason M. Rudd, Esq., is
the Debtor's legal counsel.

Oliver Zeltner of Jones Day is representing Boeing Co.  Gabe Morgan
of Weil, Gotshal & Manges is representing the pre-bankruptcy
lenders.


GEO GROUP: Lenders Prepare for Debt Talks With Prison Operator
--------------------------------------------------------------
Eliza Ronalds-Hannon of Bloomberg News reports that lenders to
private prison operator Geo Group Inc. are gearing up for debt
talks, according to people with knowledge of the matter, hiring
lawyers and interviewing financial advisers to protect their
interests in the discussions.

A group of term loan holders tapped law firm Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
while bondholders hired lawyers from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the
information is private. Both groups are interviewing financial
advisory firms, they added.

The creditors are expecting Geo Group to negotiate a maturity
extension on its 2024 term loan

                         About Geo Group

Geo Group conducts substantial business and manages and/or owns
correctional facilities (private prisons and/or mental health
facilities) in Thornton, Delaware County, Pennsylvania (George W.
Hill Correctional Facility) as well as elsewhere in Pennsylvania
(Moshannon Valley Correctional Facility in Philipsburg, PA) and
across the United States. Geo Group also conducts substantial
business in this District and Division by providing "rehabilitation
programs to individuals while in-custody and post-release into the
community."


GNIRBES INC: Disclosure Statement Hearing Slated for June 2
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mindy Mora has set for June 2, 2021, at 3 p.m., via Zoom
video conference, the hearing to consider approval of the
Disclosure Statement explaining the Plan of Gnirbes Inc.
Objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed by May 26,
2021.

A copy of the order is available for free at https://bit.ly/3wfb5k6
from PacerMonitor.com.

                        About Gnirbes Inc.

Gnirbes Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-13992) on March 26, 2020.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $100,001 and $500,000.
Judge Mindy A. Mora oversees the Debtor's case.  The Debtor is
represented by Kelley, Fulton & Kaplan, P.L.


GOODYEAR TIRE: Fitch Rates New $1.45-Bil. Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of 'BB-'/'RR4' to The Goodyear
Tire & Rubber Company's (GT) proposed issuance of $1.45 billion in
senior unsecured notes. GT intends to use proceeds from the notes
to fund a portion of the cash consideration for its acquisition of
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (CTB), along with associated fees and
expenses.

GT's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) is 'BB-'; the Rating
Outlook is Negative.

GT was placed on Under Criteria Observation (UCO) on April 9, 2021,
following the conversion of Fitch's "Exposure Draft: Corporates
Recovery Ratings and Instrument Ratings Criteria" to final. The UCO
assignment indicates that an existing instrument and/or Recovery
Rating (RR) may change as a direct result of the final criteria.
However, the 'BB-'/'RR4' rating assigned to the proposed notes is
not affected by the criteria change.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Credit Profile Post CTB Acquisition: GT's ratings reflect Fitch's
expectation that the company's credit profile over the intermediate
term will fall within Fitch's ratings sensitivities, despite some
near-term pressure due to the CTB acquisition and continued
external challenges related to the coronavirus pandemic. Supporting
GT's ratings is its decision to fund the acquisition with a
combination of cash on hand, stock and incremental borrowings.
This, along with CTB's somewhat stronger standalone credit profile,
results in only a relatively modest incremental weakening of GT's
near-term credit profile compared with Fitch's standalone
expectations for GT, with the potential for a stronger credit
profile in a few years once synergies are achieved.

Negative Rating Outlook: The Negative Rating Outlook reflects
Fitch's concerns that incremental borrowing associated with the
acquisition and integration complexities could complicate GT's
ability to strengthen its credit profile while external market
conditions remain challenging. GT's FCF is likely to be negative in
2021 as the company replenishes inventories and spends on the capex
deferred from 2020.

The Negative Rating Outlook also reflects continued uncertainty
regarding the pace of recovery in the global tire market, following
the significant demand decline seen in 2020 as a result of the
pandemic. Fitch expects global tire demand to rebound significantly
in 2021 but to remain below the 2019 level, due to lower vehicle
miles traveled (VMT). Fitch could downgrade GT's ratings if it
appears that the company's credit profile will remain outside of
its negative rating sensitivities beyond 2023. However, Fitch could
revise the Outlook to Stable if it appears the company is on track
to improve margins, FCF and leverage.

Elevated Leverage: Fitch expects GT's pro forma gross EBITDA
leverage, measured as debt/Fitch-calculated EBITDA, will be
elevated, likely in the mid-4.0x range, around the time of
acquisition close, but Fitch expects it to decline over the
intermediate term to below 4.0x as market conditions normalize and
GT realizes synergies from the acquisition. FFO leverage is likely
to be more elevated in the near term, partially due to lower FFO as
a result of about $175 million-$225 million in rationalization
payments in GT's standalone business and additional cash costs
associated with the acquisition. Fitch expects FFO leverage to
decline below the 4.5x negative rating sensitivity, but the timing
will depend on the pace of improvement in GT's cash-generating
capabilities.

Negative Near-Term FCF: Fitch expects GT's FCF will likely be
negative in 2021 as the company works to replenish its tire
inventories, which were depleted in 2020. Also, capex is likely to
be elevated as a result of spending deferred from 2020, and Fitch
expects there will be some incremental cash costs associated with
the CTB acquisition. Following 2021, Fitch expects GT's FCF to turn
positive as working capital and capex normalize, and as the company
begins to realize synergies from the acquisition. Fitch expects FCF
margins to run in the 1%-3% range in 2022 and beyond.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Following the CTB acquisition, GT will have a relatively strong
competitive position as the third-largest global tire manufacturer,
with a highly recognized brand name and a focus on the
higher-margin high-value-added (HVA) tire category. However, the
shift in focus has led to lower tire unit volumes and revenue,
particularly in the mature North American and Western European
markets. The company's diversification is increasing as rising
incomes in emerging markets lead to higher demand for HVA tires,
particularly in the Asia-Pacific region.

GT's margins are roughly consistent with those of the other large
Fitch-rated tire manufacturers, Compagnie Generale des
Etablissements Michelin (A-/Stable) and Continental AG
(BBB/Stable), but GT's leverage is considerably higher, as the
other two companies generally maintain midcycle EBITDA leverage
below 1.0x. GT's leverage is roughly consistent with that of auto
suppliers in the 'BB' category, such as Meritor, Inc. (BB-/Stable).
GT's margins are relatively strong compared with typical
'BB'-category issuers, but this is tempered by seasonal working
capital swings that lead to more variability in FCF over the course
of a year. FCF margins are also sensitive to raw material prices
and capex spending.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- GT closes on the CTB transaction 2H21.

-- About one-half of the $165 million in synergies are realized
    in 2022, with the remainder in 2023.

-- Global auto production rises by 6% in 2021, including an 8%
    increase in the U.S.

-- Global replacement tire demand largely recovers in 2021 but
    still remains below the 2019 level.

-- Beyond 2021, GT's sales grow in the low-single digits,
    excluding the effect of the CTB acquisition.

-- Capex is elevated in 2021, then runs near 5.5% over the next
    several years.

-- Debt, including off-balance sheet factoring, increases to
    about $8.7 billion in 2021, then declines toward $7.5 billion
    over the next several years.

-- FCF is negative in 2021, then runs in the 1%-3% range over the
    following years.

-- The company maintains a solid liquidity position, including
    cash and credit facility availability.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Demonstrating continued growth in tire unit volumes, market
    share and pricing.

-- Sustained FCF margins of 1.5%.

-- Sustained gross EBITDA leverage below 3.0x.

-- Sustained FFO leverage below 3.5x.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Integration issues or unforeseen costs associated with the
    acquisition that inhibit the company's ability to bring its
    credit profile inside of its negative rating sensitivities
    within two years.

-- A significant step-down in demand for the company's tires
    without a commensurate decrease in costs.

-- An unexpected increase in costs, particularly related to raw
    materials, that cannot be offset with higher pricing.

-- A decline in the company's consolidated cash below $700
    million for several quarters.

-- Sustained break-even FCF margin.

-- Sustained gross EBITDA leverage above 4.0x.

-- Sustained FFO leverage above 4.5x.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: Fitch expects GT's liquidity to remain
sufficient as the company navigates improving economic conditions
following the pandemic. As of March 31, 2021, the company had $1.2
billion in cash and cash equivalents, excluding Fitch's adjustments
for not readily available cash, and $3.4 billion in availability on
its various global credit agreements, including $2.4 billion of
availability on its primary U.S. and European revolvers. The most
significant near-term debt maturity is EUR250 million in 3.75%
senior unsecured notes issued by Goodyear Europe B.V. (GEBV) that
matures in 2023.

According to its criteria, Fitch treats $600 million of GT's cash
as not readily available, based on Fitch's estimate of the amount
of cash needed to cover seasonality in the company's business.

Debt Structure: GT's consolidated debt structure primarily consists
of a mix of secured bank credit facilities and senior unsecured
notes. As of March 31, 2021, GT had $400 million in second-lien
term loan borrowings and $3.55 billion in senior unsecured notes
outstanding. There were no borrowings outstanding on GT's
first-lien secured revolver. GEBV's debt structure consisted of
$293 million in senior unsecured notes and $158 million of
on-balance sheet accounts receivable securitization borrowings.
GEBV's secured revolver was undrawn.

GT also has various borrowings outstanding at certain non-U.S.
operations, including credit facilities in Mexico and China.

In addition to its on-balance sheet debt, Fitch treated $459
million of off-balance sheet factoring as debt at March 31, 2021.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


GOODYEAR TIRE: Moody's Rates New $1.45BB Unsecured Notes 'B2'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 rating to The Goodyear Tire
& Rubber Company's proposed $1.45 billion senior unsecured
guaranteed notes. Goodyear's existing ratings are unaffected,
including the B1 corporate family rating, the B1-PD Probability of
Default rating, the Ba2 senior secured second-lien term loan
rating, the B2 senior unsecured guaranteed notes rating and the B3
senior unsecured unguaranteed notes rating, as well as Goodyear
Europe B.V.'s senior unsecured guaranteed notes rating of Ba3. The
Speculative Grade Liquidity rating remains SGL-2. The outlook is
stable.

The proceeds from these notes will help fund the acquisition of
Cooper Tire & Rubber Company (Cooper Tire), with the transaction
expected to close in the second half of 2021.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Goodyear's ratings reflect its strong global position as a
manufacturer of aftermarket and original equipment tires supported
by a leading market share position in North America, good scale and
growth in higher-margin 17-inch and larger tires. The acquisition
of Cooper Tire strengthens Goodyear's US replacement tire position
while also meaningfully boosting the original equipment tire
business in China where demand is accelerating. The acquisition
increases pro forma debt-to-EBITDA (including Moody's standard
adjustments) towards 6x but should result in annual free cash flow
beyond 2021 of over $200 million that could be applied to debt
repayments. As a result, Moody's expects debt-to-EBITDA to fall
towards 4x by year-end 2022. The EBITA margin is expected to
rebound sharply in 2021 and resume expansion in 2022 as continued
cost savings and distribution synergies gain traction.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations for industry tire
volumes to continue rebounding through 2021, leading to improved
cost absorption and margins. The combined entity should generate
strong cash flow sufficient to fund growth investments and debt
repayment while maintaining a sizable cash position and modest
reliance on revolving credit facilities.

Goodyear's SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating is supported by
Moody's expectation for maintenance of a robust cash position ($1.2
billion at March 31, 2021) and significant availability under
various revolving credit facilities. At March 31, 2021, the company
had over $1.4 billion of availability under its $2 billion
asset-based lending facility (ABL) expiring 2025 and full
availability under the €800 million revolving credit facility set
to expire 2024. Moody's expects free cash flow, inclusive of Cooper
Tire's accretive free cash flow profile, to comfortably exceed $200
million beginning in 2022 even with higher growth investments in
working capital and capital expenditures.

Moody's took the following rating action on Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Company (The):

New Gtd. Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, assigned at B2
(LGD4)

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded with improving margins, boosted by
better than anticipated savings/synergies from the acquisition. The
expectation that meaningful, positive free cash flow will be used
for debt reduction such that debt-to-EBITDA falls to the mid-3x
range or EBITA-to-interest eclipses 3x could also warrant positive
rating action. Ratings could be downgraded if the EBITA margin
declines to the mid-5x range, free cash flow falls well shy of
Moody's expected level or debt-to-EBITDA approaches 6x.
EBITA-to-interest below 2.5x could also result in a downgrade.
Ratings pressure could also arise from a meaningful decline in
liquidity, including increased reliance on revolving credit
facilities.

Goodyear's role within the automotive industry exposes the company
to material environmental risks arising from increasing regulations
on carbon emissions. As automotive manufacturers seek to introduce
more electrified powertrains, traditional internal combustion
engines will become a smaller portion of the car parc. Electric and
battery electric vehicles are heavier, requiring tires to handle
the increase in weight while tasking tire manufacturers to conserve
raw materials with greater durability.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was the Automotive
Supplier Methodology published in January 2020.

The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is one of the largest tire
manufacturers in the world. Revenues for the latest twelve months
ended March 31, 2021 were approximately $12.8 billion. Pro forma
revenues including Cooper Tire are expected to be over $15 billion.


GREEN DOT: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on $7MM 2011A Revenue Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the rating on the following revenue
bonds issued by the California Statewide Communities Development
Authority (CA) on behalf of Green Dot Public Schools California
(GDPSC), Animo Inglewood Charter High School (AICHS) Project at
'BB+':

-- $7,095,000 charter school revenue bonds series 2011A.

In addition, Fitch has affirmed AICHS's Issuer Default Rating (IDR)
at 'BB+'.

The Rating Outlook on the revenue bonds and IDR is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are payable from pledged revenues of AICHS, including
local control funding formula (LCFF) funds from the state of
California. There is a cash-funded debt service reserve funded to
maximum annual debt service (MADS).

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

The 'BB+' IDR and bond rating reflect the school's elevated
leverage metrics given its midrange revenue defensibility
characteristics and operating risk assessment.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Defensibility -- Midrange: AICHS's midrange revenue
defensibility is supported by its solid academic performance,
history of stable enrollment, and strong demand bolstered by a
substantial waitlist. The school has some flexibility to enroll
additional students, but like all charter schools, lacks control
over tuition rate setting.

Operating Risk -- Midrange: The school has midrange flexibility to
vary costs with enrollment shifts. Fitch considers AICHS's carrying
costs for debt service and pension contributions to be low.

Financial Profile -- 'bb': The 'bb' financial profile assessment
reflects the expectation that the school will take necessary
measures to reduce expenditures if needed to maintain margin and
leverage ratios consistent with a 'bb' assessment.

Asymmetric Additional Risk Considerations: No asymmetric additional
risk considerations apply to the ratings.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- A sustained decline in Net Debt to CFADS below 6.0x while
    maintaining sustainable operating margins and cash flow
    available for debt service.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- A decline in per-pupil funding that is more significant than
    what Fitch currently anticipates in its stress case scenario,
    without additional offsetting expenditure measures taken by
    the school;

-- A sustained decline in enrollment that reduces revenues and
    weakens the financial condition of the school;

-- An increase in net debt to CFADS above 12.0x in Fitch's stress
    case;

-- The loss of the school's charter, a risk exhibited throughout
    the charter school sector.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

CREDIT PROFILE

Animo Inglewood is a charter high school located in Inglewood, CA.
Certified in 2001 and initiating operations in 2002 with 140
freshman students, AICHS has received three charter renewals since
creation, most recently in 2020 for a full five-year term. AICHS's
history of renewals and strong academic track record partially
offset the renewal risk inherent in any charter school.

GDPSC is a non-profit charter school management organization
serving over 10,000 students across a network of 20 schools in CA,
in the greater Los Angeles area. In exchange for a shared services
fee, AICHS has access to GDPSC's vendor contracts, academic and
financial management support, and fundraising capabilities.

CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS

Coronavirus Effects on California School Funding

State revenue performance has far exceeded expectations in fiscal
2021, creating a benign near-term outlook for state per-pupil
funding. California's revenues are driven by personal income and
capital gains taxes from high-income individuals, which have been
less affected by the pandemic than the broader economy. California
Governor Gavin Newsom's proposed fiscal 2022 budget includes
significant additional funding for schools, including incentives
for reopening quickly, additional summer school funding, more rapid
repayment of deferrals and a 3.8% cost of living adjustment for
Local Control Funding Formula for the 2021-2022 school year.

The federal government also provided extraordinary aid to schools
in the state, with $26.4 billion provided across three aid
packages. The largest stimulus measure, the American Rescue Plan of
March 2021, provides $15.3 billion for California schools.

Animo Inglewood Charter High School Update

During the current academic year, AICHS provided academic services
through its distance learning and hybrid academic models. The
school began the 2021 academic year fully remote and began bringing
students back gradually for specific testing and to participate in
student learning pods. As of late April, the school has begun in
person instruction for the ninth grade class.

AICHS ended fiscal 2020 (FYE June 30) favorably, with a surplus of
approximately $630,000. The school benefited from cost savings
associated with the school being closed, additional state funding,
donations, and expenditure reduction measures that were implemented
at the start of the pandemic. The school did incur additional
expenses related to the purchase of technology to facilitate
distance and hybrid learning models, but the cost savings and
additional state and federal relief funds helped the school fund
these costs.

The school's fiscal 2021 budget projects a surplus of approximately
$300,000 and includes the use of additional federal and state aid
monies to offset expenditures related to the pandemic. As of the
end of the 3Q2021, the school projects fiscal 2021 will be in line
with or above the budgeted surplus.

AICHS's charter was renewed in the of fall 2019 by the school's
authorizer, Inglewood Unified School District, for another
five-year term that began June 30, 2020.

Revenue Defensibility

AICHS's midrange revenue defensibility is driven by healthy demand
flexibility evidenced by a large and regularly updated wait list,
enrollment trends at close to capacity, and stronger historical
academic performance compared to other Inglewood city high schools.
Typical of the charter school sector, revenue defensibility is
limited by the inability to control pricing as the school's main
revenue source is derived from per pupil revenue from the state.

AICHS has had solid academic results that drive sound demand and
enrollment. The school's results on statewide assessment tests have
generally exceeded those at comparable schools, as well as
statewide averages. AICHS enrollment has been stable over the past
several academic years at around 630 students, with capacity to
increase to 650 under its charter. The school maintains an
up-to-date waitlist that is consistently at or above 50% of the
school's enrollment. Fitch views AICHS's strong demand as a source
of financial flexibility.

The school relies heavily on state revenues, which is somewhat more
volatile than typical municipal revenue given California's tax
structure. Over the long term, Fitch expects state school funding
to grow at a rate above inflation, but below GDP growth, in line
with other California schools with stable enrollment that are
funded under the LCFF.

Operating Risk

Fitch considers the school's operating risk profile to be midrange,
based on the school's fixed carrying costs and flexibility to
control other expenditures. The school has well-identified cost
drivers, largely teacher salaries and fringe benefits.

The school has midrange control over expenditures and is somewhat
limited in its practical ability to reduce the number of teachers
due to the need to maintain student teacher ratios specified in the
teacher contract and the need to provide a sufficient number of
subject matter teachers in each grade. The school is currently in
compensation negotiations with both their classified and
certificated unions.

School management maintains flexibility in the school's budget to
reduce costs if needed. In addition, the management organization
provides a central support function to the school, including
educational support and finance, accounting, and human resource
management, which reduces cost pressures from those areas.

AICHS's fixed costs for maximum annual debt service (MADS) and
pension contributions are low, at less than 15% of expenditures.
The school participates in two state-funded pension systems,
CalSTRS and CalPERS, both of which are mandating increasing
employer contributions over the next few years to improve their
funded ratios. Fitch expects carrying costs to increase modestly
given expectations for increasing pension contributions.

Management reports that it does not have any significant capital
expenditures planned in the current or upcoming fiscal year, with
minor projects being expensed through the school's normal operating
budget.

Financial Profile

AICHS's leverage is consistent with a 'bb' assessment, given the
midrange revenue defensibility and operating risk assessments. The
'bb' financial profile assessment incorporates Fitch's stress case
scenario assumption and the expectation that the school will take
necessary expenditure reduction measures to offset potential
revenue declines.

The school's 'bb' financial profile assessment reflects AICHS's
solid operating margins and cash flow generation, however the
school is limited by elevated leverage metrics that have been
maintained over the past several years. Net debt (including
Fitch-calculated net pension liabilities) to cash flow available
for debt service (CFADS) has fluctuated over the last five years
but has remained in the 'bb' assessment range. Fitch estimates the
school's NPL for CalPERS and CalSTRS by allocating a portion of
each plan's Fitch-adjusted net liability using a ratio of AICHS's
annual contributions relative to the total contribution for each
plan. The Fitch-adjusted NPL assumes a 6% discount rate, which is
lower than both plans' reported discount rates. Fitch does not
incorporate cash held by GDPSC in its analysis of net debt.

Fitch's base case assumes growth in state and local education
revenues at about 2.5% and growth in variable expenditures at a
slightly lower rate. Fitch also assumes the school's Fitch-adjusted
net pension liabilities remain constant. Over the three-year base
case scenario, AICHS's coverage metrics remain in line with 2020
levels and leverage metrics continue to improve marginally and
remain within the 'bb' financial profile assessment range.

Fitch's stress case utilizes the FAST Econometric API - Fitch
Analytical Stress Test Model (FAST) to determine the impact of a
typical recession on revenues assuming constant enrollment. While
the output derived from FAST is not a forecast, it does provide
estimates of possible revenue behavior in a downturn, based on
historical performance. As such, Fitch has incorporated FAST
results, along with analytical judgement, to develop the stress
case.

The stress case incorporates a higher revenue decline in year one
than the base case, reflecting a steeper decline in per-pupil
funding, followed by marginal revenue growth in year two and higher
growth in year three. Fitch assumes the school will take measures
to control expenditures during year one in response to revenue
declines, with expenditure growth at around inflation in years two
and three. In this scenario, leverage metrics become more elevated
in the initial years, but remain consistent with a 'bb' financial
profile assessment.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


GROWLIFE INC: Receives Second Default Notice From Lender
--------------------------------------------------------
GrowLife, Inc. received on April 23, 2021, a notice of an event of
default on the following notes held by Silverback Capital
Corporation: (i) the Secured Convertible Promissory Note and
Securities Purchase Agreement dated Aug. 7, 2018 (ii) the Secured
Convertible Promissory Note and Securities Purchase Agreement dated
July 22, 2019, and (iii) the Secured Convertible Promissory Note
and Securities Purchase Agreement dated Jan. 30, 2020.  

The Default Notices were issued as result of the Company's
inability to provide the reserve share requirement as specified in
the Notes.  Silverback has asserted its rights as penalty for the
reserve share default to increase in the outstanding Note balances
by 15%, an increase in the conversion discount by 5% to 60%, and a
default interest rate on the outstanding note balances of 22%.

As a result of the reserve share default, on May 7, 2021,
Silverback demanded immediate payment in full of all amounts
outstanding under the Notes.  The Company was unable to meet the
demand, and as a result on May 10, 2021, Silverback presented
second default notice for lack of payment.  Silverback has asserted
its rights for the second default and as penalty therefore asserted
an increase in the outstanding note balances by another 15%, an
additional increase in the conversion discount by 5% to 55% and a
default interest rate on the outstanding note balances of 22%.

At this time the Company is unable to payoff its entire loan
balance due to Silverback or meet its reserve share obligations
required in the Notes.  The Company is taking action to remedy
these two events of default.

                          About GrowLife

GrowLife, Inc. (PHOT)-- http://www.shopgrowlife.com-- aims to
become the nation's largest cultivation service provider for
cultivating organics, herbs and greens and plant-based medicines.
Through a network of local representatives covering the United
States and Canada, regional centers and its e-Commerce team,
GrowLife provides essential goods and services including media,
industry-leading hydroponics and soil, plant nutrients, and
thousands of more products to specialty grow operations. GrowLife
is headquartered in Kirkland, Washington and was founded in 2012.

GrowLife reported a net loss of $6.38 million in 2020, a net loss
of $7.37 million in 2019, and a net loss of $11.47 million in 2018.
As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company had $4.29 million in total
assets, $7.65 million in total current liabilities, $2.19 million
in total long term liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit
of $5.54 million.

Walnut Creek, California-based BPM LLP, the Company's auditor since
2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 15, 2021, citing that the Company has sustained recurring
losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit since
inception.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

BPM LLP, in Walnut Creek, California, the Company's auditor since
2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 1, 2020 citing that the Company has sustained a net loss from
operations and has an accumulated deficit since inception. These
factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


GRUPO AEROMEXICO: Asks Court to Reject December 2020 Ch.11 Deal
---------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that Mexican airline Grupo Aeromexico SAB de CV has
asked a New York bankruptcy judge to reject a request by the
manager of its customer loyalty program to approve a deal the
companies struck in December 2020, saying only debtors can submit
settlements to the court.

In a motion filed Friday, May 14, 2021, Aeromexico claimed it alone
has standing to ask for the approval of a proposed settlement it
reached with PLM Premier and PLM minority owner Aimia Holdings,
saying PLM and Aimia were engaged in an "ill-conceived" attempt to
force Aeromexico to assume contracts on their schedule rather than
according to its own business.

                      About Grupo Aeromexico SAB de CV

Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. -- https://www.aeromexico.com/ --
is a holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in commercial
aviation in Mexico and the promotion of passenger loyalty
programs.

Aeromexico, Mexico's global airline, has its main hub at Terminal 2
at the Mexico City International Airport.  Its destinations network
features the United States, Canada, Central America, South America,
Asia and Europe.

Grupo Aeromexico and three of its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11563) on June 30,
2020. In the petitions signed by CFO Ricardo Javier Sanchez Baker,
the Debtors reported consolidated assets and liabilities of $1
billion to $10 billion.

Timothy Graulich, Esq., of Davis Polk and Wardell LLP, serves as
counsel to the Debtors.


HEARTLAND DENTAL: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR on American Dental Deal
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of HEARTLAND DENTAL,
LLC, including the Corporate Family Rating at B3, the Probability
of Default Rating at B3-PD, the first lien senior secured debt
rating at B2, and the senior unsecured notes at Caa2. The outlook
remains stable.

The rating action follows the announced acquisition of American
Dental Partners, Inc. ("American Dental"; B3) for $660 million.
American Dental provides management services to affiliate dental
centers, which are primarily focused on general dentistry and
hygiene, with a growing focus on aesthetic segments (orthodontics,
endodontics, periodontics). American Dental currently operates
approximately 278 offices across 21 states. The company expects the
acquisition to close in the second quarter 2021 and be fully debt
funded.

The affirmation of the B3 CFR reflects the added scale, potential
for near-term cost synergies and longer-term operational synergies
that the acquisition will bring to Heartland. For example,
Heartland will look to add value to American Dental by expanding
their scope of services including adding the Invisalign product
offering. Other areas of savings include procurement, laboratory
savings and rate renegotiations with payors given Heartland's
expanded scale. While the acquisition will raise pro forma
debt/EBITDA to the mid 7.0x-range (excluding synergies) Moody's
expects that leverage will decline to the 7.0x range by the end of
2021 driven by the realization of synergies and continued recovery
from the pandemic impact in 2020.

Despite Heartland's expertise with small tuck-in acquisitions,
there is integration risk as American Dental will be the largest
acquisition for Heartland since it was acquired by KKR in 2018.
Further, Moody's expects the company to continue to make other
acquisitions and continue to spend heavily to fund new office
openings concurrent with the integration of American Dental. This
raises operational, financial and liquidity risk and demonstrates
the highly aggressive nature of Heartland's growth strategy.

The stable outlook is supported by a favorable industry outlook and
Heartland's good operating and acquisition track record. The stable
outlook also incorporates Moody's expectation that Heartland will
continue to be aggressive with its growth strategy, but that it
will maintain good liquidity and could reduce discretionary
spending should it face an operating set-back.

Ratings affirmed:

Issuer: HEARTLAND DENTAL, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, affirmed at B3

Probability of Default Rating, affirmed at B3-PD

Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Bank Credit Facility, affirmed
at B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loans, affirmed at B2 (LGD3)

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, affirmed at Caa2 (LGD6)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: HEARTLAND DENTAL, LLC

Outlook, remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Heartland's B3 Corporate Family Rating reflects its high
debt/EBITDA and negative free cash flow in light of its aggressive
growth strategy. The rating is supported by the company's position
as one of the largest dental support organization (DSO) in the US,
favorable industry dynamics and good geographic diversity.
Additionally, Heartland has some ability to improve cash flow and
liquidity by reducing new office openings and new dentist
affiliation investments.

Moody's expects Heartland to maintain good liquidity over the next
12-18 months. The company has historically had negative free cash
flow due to growth and acquisition spending. Moody's believes that
free cash flow will be positive in 2021 due to improved operating
performance and the addition of American Dental, which generates
positive free cash flow. Liquidity is supported by the company's
$245 million cash balance as of December 31, 2020, and an undrawn
$135 million revolver. There are no financial maintenance covenants
on the term loans.

Moody's considers coronavirus to be a social risk given the risk to
human health and safety. Aside from coronavirus, Heartland Dental
faces other social risks such as the rising concerns around the
access and affordability of healthcare services. However, Moody's
does not consider the dental service companies to face the same
level of social risk as many other healthcare providers. Heartland
Dental, in particular, generates most of its revenues from
commercial insurance which Moody's views favorably.

From a governance perspective, Moody's views Heartland's growth
strategy to be extremely aggressive given its history of
debt-funded acquisitions and high leverage. Heartland has added
over 200 offices since its acquisition by KKR in March 2018, either
through acquisition or opening new dental offices. While there is
execution risk to rapid growth, acquisitions and new store openings
have generally been executed successfully. Owner dentists and the
equity sponsor contributed about $122 million dollars in August
2020 through an equity raise, a credit positive.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be downgraded if the company's earnings weaken or
financial leverage increases. Failure to integrate American Dental
successfully, pursuit of an overly aggressive expansion strategy or
deterioration in Heartland's cash flow or liquidity could also
result in a ratings downgrade.

The ratings could be upgraded if Heartland adopts less aggressive
financial policies and reduces debt to EBITDA below 6.0 times.
Additionally, the company would have to materially improve free
cash flow.

Heartland provides support staff and comprehensive business support
functions under administrative service agreements to its affiliated
dental offices, organized as professional corporations. Heartland
currently operates more than 1,400 offices across 38 states.
Heartland is majority-owned by KKR, and Ontario Teachers' Pension
Plan Board maintains partial ownership. The company generated about
$1.5 billion in net patient service revenue as of December 31,
2020.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.


HOYA MIDCO: Moody's Puts B3 CFR Under Review for Upgrade
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed Hoya Midco, LLC's ("Vivid Seats")
ratings, including its B3 Corporate Family Rating, on review for
upgrade. The rating outlook was changed to ratings under review
from negative. This action follows the company's announcement[1]
that it has entered into a definitive merger agreement with Horizon
Acquisition Corporation, a publicly-traded special purpose
acquisition company that will result in Vivid Seats Inc. becoming a
public company and a significant portion of the existing debt will
be repaid.

Under the proposed merger agreement, the transaction will provide
approximately $769 million of gross proceeds to Vivid Seats,
including a $225 million fully committed common stock PIPE provided
by institutional investors, including Fidelity Management &
Research Company LLC, and Eldridge Industries, LLC ("Eldridge").
Eldridge has also committed to make an additional investment in
common stock equal to Horizon's shareholder redemptions, if any.
The company disclosed in its announcement [1] that all proceeds,
net of transaction expenses, will be used for debt repayment and
capital structure optimization. The transaction is expected to
close in the second half of 2021, and its subject to shareholder
approval and other customary closing conditions.

On Review for Upgrade:

Issuer: Hoya Midco, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Placed on Review for Upgrade, currently
B3

Probability of Default Rating, Placed on Review for Upgrade,
currently B3-PD

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Placed on Review for Upgrade,
currently B3 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Hoya Midco, LLC

Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE / FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR
DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The review will focus on Vivid Seats' capital structure, financial
and growth strategy as a public company, and resulting financial
leverage following the completion of the SPAC merger. Moody's
expects that Vivid Seats will materially reduce its leverage as all
proceeds, net of transaction expenses, are earmarked for debt
repayment and capital structure optimization. At the end of fiscal
2020, Vivid Seats had approximately $895 million debt and $200
million of preferred equity outstanding, with $285 million cash on
hand. The review will also focus on the company's expected pace of
earnings recovery from the coronavirus pandemic. The new capital
structure would likely strengthen Vivid Seats' credit profile by
significantly reducing debt levels, with the potential for a rating
upgrade of one or two notches.

Vivid Seats' credit profile continues to reflect its concentrated
business profile in the ticket resale market and the stiff
competition it faces from larger, diversified companies operating
both primary and secondary ticket marketplaces. The rating remains
supported by the company's entrenched position in the secondary
ticket marketplace, the scalable nature of its platform which
benefits from network effects, and strong double-digit EBITDA
margins the company has been able to consistently achieve prior to
the unprecedented event cancellations and venues/ theater/sports
events closures due to coronavirus outbreak in the US. The
company's leverage spiked in 2020 due to the pandemic, but Moody's
expects a gradual earnings recovery as the pandemic abates which
should return EBITDA close to the pre-pandemic levels by the end of
2022. The company's credit profile is challenged by intense
competition from two larger peers and continued regulatory scrutiny
surrounding the secondary ticket marketplace and fee transparency.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Hoya Midco, LLC is the parent company of Vivid Seats LLC,
headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, which provides an online
marketplace serving the secondary ticketing industry. The company
is majority-owned by affiliates of GTCR, LLC and co-investors, with
ownership stakes also held by affiliates of Vista Equity Partners
Management LLC and the management team.


HUMANIGEN INC: Incurs $65.6 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Humanigen, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $65.57
million on $486,000 of total revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $2.47 million on zero
revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $98.85 million in total
assets, $81.83 million in total liabilities, and $17.02 million in
total stockholders' equity.

The increase in net loss for the first quarter 2021 as compared to
the first quarter 2020 was largely due to an increase in total
expenses, mainly research and development expense of $59.2 million
from $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 to
$59.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021.  The
increase in R&D is primarily due to an increase of $51.4 million of
expense in lenzilumab manufacturing costs and $7.5 million for
clinical trial expenses related to the LIVE-AIR study, both of
which began after the first quarter of 2020.  The costs incurred
for the production of lenzilumab will continue to be included in
R&D until lenzilumab is authorized or approved for commercial use,
at which point the amounts expended for production will be
classified as inventory.

Net cash used in operating activities, net of balance sheet
changes, was $35.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2021.  During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the company
raised net proceeds of $36.1 million from the sale of shares of
common stock under its At-the-Market offering program.  The company
drew the first tranche of $25.0 million under its credit facility
with Hercules Capital, providing net proceeds of $24.4 million.  As
of March 31, 2021, the company had cash and cash equivalents of
$92.9 million.  The company also completed a public offering in the
second quarter of 2021 with net proceeds of $94.1 million.  The
proforma balance of cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2021
with the proceeds from the public offering is $187.0 million.  The
company expects to continue to use its funds on development and
manufacturing of lenzilumab in anticipation of its potential
commercialization under EUA or other conditional marketing
authorizations.  In the second quarter of 2021 the company
anticipates the amount of spending on lenzilumab production will be
at least the same level as the first quarter of 2021.  If an EUA or
CMA for lenzilumab is not received by mid-2021, the company will
seek to decrease or eliminate spending on the production of
lenzilumab for commercial use.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1293310/000121465921005311/h51021110q.htm

                          About Humanigen

Based in Brisbane, California, Humanigen, Inc. (OTCQB: HGEN),
formerly known as KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. --
http://www.humanigen.com-- is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical
company, developing its clinical stage immuno-oncology and
immunology portfolio of monoclonal antibodies.  The Company is
focusing its efforts on the development of its lead product
candidate, lenzilumab, its proprietary Humaneered anti-human GM-CSF
immunotherapy, through a clinical research agreement with Kite
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Gilead company to study the effect of
lenzilumab on the safety of Yescarta, axicabtagene ciloleucel
including cytokine release syndrome, which is sometimes also
referred to as cytokine storm, and neurotoxicity, with a secondary
endpoint of increased efficacy in a multicenter Phase Ib/II
clinical trial in adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell
lymphoma.

Humanigen reported a net loss of $89.53 million for the 12 months
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $10.29 million for
the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the
Company had $68.30 million in total assets, $22.76 million in total
liabilities, and $45.54 million in total stockholders' equity.


HYSTER-YALE GROUP: Moody's Rates New $225MM First Lien Loan 'B1'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Hyster-Yale Group, Inc.'s B2
corporate family rating and B2-PD probability of default rating.
Moody's also assigned a B1 rating to the proposed $225 million
first lien term loan due 2028. Moody's also upgraded the company's
Speculative Grade Liquidity rating to SGL-2 from SGL-3. The rating
outlook has been changed to positive from stable.

Proceeds from the new term loan will be used to repay all existing
first lien term loan debt outstanding as well as to increase cash
reserves.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Hyster-Yale's B2 CFR reflects the company's low EBITA margins,
typically between 2% and 4%. This is due to the company's
relatively high cost structure when compared to many of its
competitors. Although Moody's expects margin improvement in 2021 as
demand recovers, EBITA margins will remain below 4% through 2022.
This along with a build in working capital and ongoing capital
investment will lead to modest negative free cash flow through
2022, despite its revenue base of almost $3 billion. Hyster-Yale's
rating also reflects its heavy reliance on the US lift truck
market, which comprises almost 60% of revenues.

However, the ratings also reflect the company's solid market
position in the global lift truck market, enhanced by recent
acquisitions. Hyster-Yale's strong market position and innovation
investments make it well-placed to grow its share as demand from
industrial customers rebounds in upcoming years. Bookings (dollar
value) increased by 94% in the first quarter of 2021 versus the
same period in 2020. At the same time, backlog increased by nearly
60%, and now stands at about $1.5 billion. The stronger backlog
supports Moody's expectations that Hyster-Yale's revenues will grow
to over $3 billion in 2021, recovering much of the sales lost
during the downturn of 2020. With better scale and ongoing cost
reduction initiatives underway, Moody's believes that Hyster-Yale
will be able to steadily improve EBITA margins to over 4% over the
next few years.

Hyster-Yale maintains a relatively conservative capital structure
and financial policy. On close of the term loan refinancing, the
company will have balance sheet debt of about $350 million. Moody's
projects Hyster-Yale's debt-to-EBITDA to be in the mid 3x range in
2021. While this is slightly higher than recent levels,
Hyster-Yale's leverage will remain low for the rating. The company
prioritizes its capital deployment toward investment, rather than
shareholder returns. The company has not made any material share
repurchases over the last several years but does pay a quarterly
dividend, aggregating $21 million annually. It is important that
Hyster-Yale maintain modest leverage and conservative financial
policies to offset its thin margins and volatile industry demand
inherent in its operations.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectations of gradual
margin improvement through 2022 on robust sales growth. This will
allow debt-to-EBITDA to return to sub-3x levels by 2022. Moody's
expects no change to financial policy over this period, but
modestly-sized acquisitions may occur.

The first lien term loan is rated B1, one notch higher than the
CFR, reflecting the loss absorption provided by other unsecured
liabilities in the event of default. Higher notching on the term
loan using Moody's Loss Given Default for Speculative-Grade
Companies methodology is constrained by the existence of a $300
million ABL revolver facility that is ranked senior to the term
loan.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could upgrade Hyster-Yale's ratings if it maintains EBITA
margin above 4% while keeping debt-to-EBITDA below 3.5x. The
sustainment of good liquidity, with prospects for positive free
cash flow, could also support a ratings upgrade.

Ratings could be downgraded if the company significantly increases
debt, resulting in debt-to-EBITDA of over 5.5x. Also, sustained
weakness in EBITA margins at close to breakeven levels or a
deterioration in liquidity could result in lower ratings.

Assignments:

Issuer: Hyster-Yale Group, Inc.

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B1 (LGD3)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Hyster-Yale Group, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Upgrades:

Issuer: Hyster-Yale Group, Inc.

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Manufacturing
Methodology published in March 2020.

Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Hyster-Yale Materials Handling,
Inc., through its operating subsidiary Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. is
an integrated full-line lift truck manufacturer. In addition, the
company produces lift truck attachments, hydrogen fuel cell power
products and provides telematics, automation and fleet management
services, as well as an array of other power options for its lift
trucks. Revenue was approximately $2.8 billion in 2020.


IDEANOMICS INC: To Acquire US Hybrid for $50M
---------------------------------------------
Ideanomics Inc. has signed a definitive agreement to acquire 100%
of privately held US Hybrid in cash and stock consideration.  The
acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions.

Ideanomics will acquire US Hybrid for an aggregate purchase price
of $50,000,000 in a combination of $30,000,000 of cash and
$20,000,000 worth of Ideanomics stock as consideration, subject to
customary purchase price adjustments set forth in the Agreement.
US Hybrid designs, manufactures, and markets integrated power
conversion systems for battery electric, fuel cell, and hybrid
vehicles, as well as systems for renewable energy generation and
storage.

The Agreement contains customary representations, warranties,
covenants, termination rights and indemnities of the parties.
Non-fundamental representations and warranties survive for 18
months following the closing date and fundamental representations
and warranties survive either indefinitely or for the statute of
limitations.  The Agreement also contains mutual indemnification
obligations of the parties thereto.  The indemnification
obligations of the parties are capped at $25,000,000 for
non-fundamental representations and warranties.  The
indemnification obligations of the parties for breaches of
non-fundamental representations and warranties are subject to a
$100,000 deductible, except in the case of fraud.  The Agreement
contains customary covenants.

"The acquisition of US Hybrid is a significant one for our EV
efforts across the Ideanomics Mobility division and is the
stepping-stone we were looking for to ensure we provide vehicles
and technologies that can proudly allow us to state the meaningful
components are Made in America.  We are excited to bring Dr.
Goodarzi and team into the Ideanomics family, they have been
exceptional to work with throughout our discussions, and we look
forward to helping them develop their business further.  We will be
bringing their technologies and capabilities into our own vehicles,
as well as helping the broader industry leverage the outstanding
technology the US Hybrid team has developed in Hybrid, EV, and
Hydrogen fuel cells," said Alf Poor, Ideanomics CEO.  "With decades
of experience and credibility from deployments with reputable
customers, US Hybrid will become an innovation engine for
Ideanomics and provide strategic opportunities for clean technology
applications across the zero emissions transportation value chain,
both now and in the future."

"We are excited to be joining the Ideanomics family, as a
synergistic addition to the Ideanomics ecosystem of EV businesses.
Ideanomics' global platform will provide us with the opportunity to
unlock the commercialization and sales potential of our
American-made zero-emission products within Ideanomics and our
broad customer base.  This combination of our businesses provides
for a bright future in zero emission transportation, where we
continue to innovate for the future, while scaling our commercial
products to meet the immediate demands of the industry," said Dr.
Gordon Abas Goodarzi, PhD, PE, CEO of US Hybrid.

                          About Ideanomics

Ideanomics is a global company focused on the convergence of
financial services and industries experiencing technological
disruption.  Its Mobile Energy Global (MEG) division is a service
provider which facilitates the adoption of electric vehicles by
commercial fleet operators through offering vehicle procurement,
finance and leasing, and energy management solutions under its
innovative sales to financing to charging (S2F2C) business model.
Ideanomics Capital is focused on disruptive fintech solutions and
services across the financial services industry.  Together, MEG and
Ideanomics Capital provide their global customers and partners with
leading technologies and services designed to improve transparency,
efficiency, and accountability, and its shareholders with the
opportunity to participate in high-potential, growth industries.
The Company is headquartered in New York, NY, with operations in
the U.S., China, Ukraine, and Malaysia.

Ideanomics reported a net loss of $106.04 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $96.83 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$234.41 million in total assets, $32.64 million in total
liabilities, $1.26 million in series A convertible redeemable
preferred stock, $7.48 million in redeemable non-controlling
interest, and $193.02 million in total equity.


IMERYS TALC AMERICA:Asks Court Okay to Carry Out Ch.11 Acquisitions
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that talc supplier Imerys Talc America asked a
Delaware bankruptcy judge for permission to enact its plans to buy
up small operating businesses to help generate revenue for its
claimants, including authorization to move quickly in putting down
cash deposits without further court approval.

In papers filed Friday, Imerys said it is looking to buy one or
more operating companies that will become the property of the
debtor and, post-bankruptcy, would be owned by a Chapter 11 trust
that will disburse any revenues from the operating assets for the
benefit of Imerys personal injury claimants.

                    About Imerys Talc America

Imerys Talc and its subsidiaries --
https://www.imerys-performance-additives.com/ -- are in the
business of mining, processing, selling, and distributing talc.
Talc is a hydrated magnesium silicate that is used in the
manufacturing of dozens of products in a variety of sectors,
including coatings, rubber, paper, polymers, cosmetics, food, and
pharmaceuticals. Its talc operations include talc mines, plants,
and distribution facilities located in: Montana (Yellowstone,
Sappington, and Three Forks); Vermont (Argonaut and Ludlow); Texas
(Houston); and Ontario, Canada (Timmins, Penhorwood, and Foleyet).
It also utilizes offices located in San Jose, California and
Roswell, Georgia.

Imerys Talc America, Inc., and two subsidiaries, namely Imerys Talc
Vermont, Inc., and Imerys Talc Canada Inc., sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10289) on Feb. 13,
2019.

The Debtors were estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in
assets and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., and Latham &
Watkins LLP as counsel; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as
financial advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims agent.


INTEGRATED VENTURES: Incurs $16.6-Mil. Net Loss in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Integrated Ventures, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $16.59 million on $696,805 of total revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $444,671 on
$130,910 of total revenues for the three months ended March 31,
2020.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2021, the Company reported a
net  loss of $17.18 million on $961,152 of total revenues compared
to a net loss of $573,580 on $374,052 of total revenues for the
nine months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $5.15 million in total
assets, $310,974 in total liabilities, $1.13 million in series C
preferred stock, $3 million in series D preferred stock, and
$709,964 in total stockholders' equity.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had total current assets of
$2,635,866, including cash of $99,974 and equipment deposits of
$2,528,392, and total current liabilities of $310,974.  During the
three months ended March 31, 2021, the Company's lenders converted
in full their convertible notes payable and the related derivative
liabilities were settled.

Most recently, the Company has funded its operations primarily from
convertible notes payable, the issuance of Series C and D preferred
stock, and cash generated from its digital currency mining
operations.  The Series C and D preferred stock are recorded at
total face value of $4,125,000 as mezzanine equity due to certain
mandatory redemption features of the stock.

During the nine months ended March 31, 2021, the Company received
net proceeds from convertible notes payable of $563,000, which debt
was converted in full into shares of its common stock.  The Company
also funded the purchase of cryptocurrency mining equipment through
short-term installment debt totaling $57,822.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1520118/000147793221003165/intv_10q.htm

                     About Integrated Ventures Inc.
                
Integrated Ventures Inc. operates as technology holdings Company
with focus on cryptocurrency sector.  For more information, please
visit company's website at www.integratedventuresinc.com

Integrated Ventures reported a net loss of $1.08 million for the
year ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $9.51 million
for the year ended June 30, 2019.

Houston, Texas-based M&K CPAS, PLLC, the Company's auditor since
2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Sept. 23, 2020, citing that since inception, the Company has
suffered net losses that have resulted in an accumulated deficit
and stockholders' deficit, which raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


JAGUAR HEALTH: Adjourns Annual Meeting to June 11
-------------------------------------------------
Jaguar Health, Inc.'s Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May
13, 2021 was adjourned due to a lack of quorum.  The adjourned
meeting will be held at 8:30 a.m. Pacific Standard Time (11:30 a.m.
Eastern Standard Time) on Friday, June 11, 2021, at the offices of
the Company at 200 Pine Str. Suite 400, San Francisco, Calif.  The
record date for determining stockholders eligible to vote at the
Annual Meeting will remain the close of business on April 12, 2021.
Stockholders have thus far strongly supported the proposals.

No action is required by any stockholder who has previously
delivered a proxy and who does not wish to revoke or change that
proxy.

"We currently have less than 0.1% of our total authorized shares of
Common Stock available for future issuance, taking into account
shares issued and outstanding and shares reserved for issuance upon
exercise of outstanding warrants, existing equity incentive awards,
and under our stock incentive plan and inducement award plans.  The
Board believes that approval of Proposal 3 - the proposed increase
in the number of authorized shares of Common Stock - will benefit
us by providing flexibility in responding to future business
opportunities as the Board may deem in the best interest of
shareholders, from time to time; and also, if deemed in the best
interest of shareholders by the Board, to raise additional capital
from time to time to execute our business plans," Conte said.

"We encourage all eligible stockholders who have not yet voted
their shares - or provided voting instructions to their broker or
other record holder – to do so prior to the Annual Meeting, as
your participation is important.  See below under 'How to Vote' for
instructions on how to vote if you have not already voted, or if
you would like to change your votes," said Lisa Conte, Jaguar's
president and CEO.  "Jaguar's Board of Directors recommends a vote
"FOR" the presented proposals.  Based on a preliminary review of
the votes cast, over 80% have voted in favor of Proposal 3
("Approving an amendment to the Company's Third Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the "COI"), to
increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock from
150,000,000 shares to 290,000,000 shares.").  Approximately an
additional 11% of the Company's eligible common stock outstanding
needs to be voted to reach quorum."

                           How to Vote

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 12,
2021 may vote by internet at http://www.voteproxy.com,or by
telephone at 800-776-9437 (this voting phone number is operational
24x7), or by returning a properly executed proxy card. Stockholders
who hold shares of Jaguar stock in street name may vote through
their broker. Street name stockholders requiring assistance with
voting their shares are encouraged to contact Jaguar's proxy
solicitation firm, Georgeson, at 866-821-0284, Monday to Friday
from 9:00 AM – 11:00 PM US Eastern Standard Time, and Saturday
from 12:00 PM-6:00 PM US Eastern Standard Time.  Georgeson's call
center is not staffed on Sundays.

No changes have been made to the proposals to be voted on by
stockholders at the Annual Meeting.  The Company's Proxy Statement
and any other materials filed by the Company with the SEC can be
obtained free of charge at the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

                        About Jaguar Health

Jaguar Health, Inc. -- http://www.jaguar.health-- is a commercial
stage pharmaceuticals company focused on developing novel,
sustainably derived gastrointestinal products on a global basis.
The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
focuses on developing and commercializing proprietary human
gastrointestinal pharmaceuticals for the global marketplace from
plants used traditionally in rainforest areas.  Its Mytesi
(crofelemer) product is approved by the U.S. FDA for the
symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adults with
HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy.

Jaguar Health reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $33.81
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss
and comprehensive loss of $38.54 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $42.84 million in
total assets, $25.64 million in total liabilities, and $17.20
million in total stockholders' equity.


JAMES B. THOMAS: Public Access to Ex. A of Sale Motion Restricted
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Maryland granted the request of Michael G. Wolff,
the Subchapter V Trustee of James B. Thomas, to restrict public
access to Exhibit A of his motion to sell, via private sale, the
real property located at 625 Eldrid Drive, in Silver Spring,
Maryland, to Rafael Espinal for $379,900.

The Trustee sought to restrict public access to personal
identification information contained in a document filed in the
case.

The document as specified in the Motion will be restricted from
public access.

The Clerk will docket the redacted document in accordance with Fed.
R. Bankr. P. 9037(h)(2).

The Movant will serve copies of the Order to the Debtor, the
counsel for the Debtor, the case trustee, and the U.S. Trustee, and
any individual whose personal identifying information has been
restricted from public access within 14 days of the date of entry
of the Order.

            About James B. Thomas

James B. Thomas filed a Voluntary Petition for Relief pursuant to
Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code on Sept. 26, 2019.  On Jan. 27,
2020, the Debtor converted his case to a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
(Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 19-22866-LSS).  On April 16, 2020, the
Debtor filed an Amended Voluntary Petition Election to Proceed
under Subchapter V of Chapter 11.  On Jan, 14, 2021, Michael G.
Wolff was assigned as the Chapter 11 Subchapter V Trustee in the
matter.



JBS USA: Moody's Rates New $500MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'Ba1'
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Ba1 rating to proposed
$500 million senior unsecured 10-year notes to be co-issued by JBS
USA Lux S.A. ("JBS USA"), along with wholly-owned subsidiaries JBS
USA Finance, Inc. ("JBS USA Finance") and JBS USA Food Company
("JBS USA Food"). The co-issuers are indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Brazil based JBS S.A. (Ba1 stable, the "parent").
The new notes will be guaranteed by the parent and several
restricted subsidiaries, excluding Pilgrim's Pride Corporation (Ba3
stable). The other ratings of JBS USA and the stable outlook are
unaffected.

Net proceeds from the proposed notes will be used to fund the
pending acquisition of Dutch plant-based food company, Vivera, for
EUR341 million ($412 million) and for general corporate purposes.

New Assignments:

Issuer: JBS USA Lux S.A.

GTD Senior Unsecured Global Notes, Assigned Ba1

RATINGS RATIONALE

JBS USA Lux S.A.'s ("JBS USA") instrument ratings are driven
primarily by the credit profile of parent guarantor, JBS S.A.
(Corporate Family Rating, Ba1 stable), which controls JBS USA in
all material respects. Thus, Moody's expect that future changes to
the JBS USA debt instrument ratings and outlook will reflect any
changes to the JBS S.A. Corporate Family Rating and outlook,
respectively. The ratings could also be affected by any changes in
capital structure that result in material shifts in relative rights
of payment, guarantees or collateral support with respect to debt
instruments of JBS USA and JBS S.A.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade to JBS USA debt instrument ratings would likely result
from an upgrade to the JBS S.A. Corporate Family Rating.
Conversely, a downgrade to JBS USA debt instrument ratings would
likely result from a downgrade to the JBS S.A. Corporate Family
Rating.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Protein and
Agriculture published in May 2019.

JBS USA Lux S.A. operates the North America beef and pork segments
and the Australian beef and lamb operations of Brazil-based JBS
S.A., the largest protein processor in the world. JBS USA Lux S.A.
also owns a controlling 80.2% equity interest in US-based Pilgrim's
Pride Corporation (NASDAQ: PPC), the second largest poultry
processor in the world. Reported net sales for JBS S.A.
consolidated and JBS USA Lux S.A. consolidated for the twelve
months ended December 2020 were approximately $52.3 billion and
$39.3 billion, respectively.


JET REAL ESTATE: $1.6M Sale of Del Mar Property to Zambon Approved
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Margaret M. Mann of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of California authorized Jet Real Estate Group,
LLC's sale of the real property located at 12994 Via Esperia, in
Del Mar, California, Parcel Number 3010922600, to Brent Zambon for
$1.6 million.

A hearing on the Motion was held on April 15, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.

The Debtor is authorized to close the sale as contemplated in the
Sale Agreement and the Order.

The Debtor is authorized to pay through escrow all usual and
customary costs of sale, including without limitation (a) escrow
fees, (b) title insurance fees, (c) recording fees, (d) messenger
fees, and (e) liens of record, in each case to the extent not
disputed by the Debtor.  The liens that may be forthwith paid by
the Debtor from escrow include (i) the liens of any and all taxing
authorities, (ii) the liens recorded in favor of secured creditor
Mike Hall, Trustee of the Hall Family Trust, dated June 14, 1989,
for $525,000, the amount undisputed by Debtor, and (ii) the lien
recorded in favor of secured creditor Thomas Farley for the amount
of $200,000.  No further distribution of the sale proceeds will be
made without the express approval of the Court.

The sale of the Property is free and clear of all liens,
encumbrances, and interests, as set forth in the Motion, with
respect to noticed lienholders Trust, Farley, and the San Diego
County Treasurer-Tax Collector.  To the extent that any portion of
a claim, lien, or interest in or to the Property is not paid
through escrow, such claims, liens, and interests in and to the
Property will attach to the net sale proceeds that are received by
the Debtor through escrow.

As the Debtor and the Trust, following a telephonic meet and confer
between their respective counsel of record, are unable to agree on
the amount of Trust's liens, the Motion is without prejudice as to
the total amount of these liens.

Any amount claimed by Trust exceeding $525,000 will be disposed
according to further order of the Court.  Upon the close of escrow,
the Debtor is authorized to open an interest-bearing, DIP Savings
Account, at a repository approved by the Office of the United
States Trustee, for the express purpose of holding the Disputed
Amount until such time that the Court can determine how to dispose
of it.

The Debtor will not distribute or otherwise transact the funds held
in the Savings Account absent express instruction from the Court,
and Debtor will provide Trust with monthly statements for the
Savings Account.  Any interest generated by the Savings Account
will be disbursed at the sole discretion of the Court.

The Order adequately protects the interest of Trust.

The issuer of a title policy insuring the sale of the Property
contemplated by the Sale Agreement, if any, and the Escrow Agent,
will be entitled to rely upon the Order in connection with the
Sale.

The Tentative Ruling (Exhibit A) and all findings and conclusions
of law contained in the Tentative Ruling will be fully incorporated
into the Order by reference.

The $525,000 payment to Trust is allowed as an interim distribution
without prejudice to adjustment either higher or lower as the
disputes about offsets, attorneys fee and default interest are
resolved.  The Debtor disputes the Trust's claim of $846,349.31,
but has agreed to pay $525,000 to Trust leaving $321,349.31 unpaid.


If the Trust's claim is paid in full, the net proceeds would be
$542,058.99.  Despite the exclusion of the various sale fees
assumed by the Debtor and the approximation of the Farley Lien, the
net proceeds with the Trust's claim paid in full would be enough to
cover the sale fees and the variance in the Farley Lien.  There
would also be enough funds to pay JPMorgan's unsecured claim of
$30,344.38, which would be reduced by the additional $15,000
payment from the Buyer.

A copy of the Exhibit A is available at
https://tinyurl.com/rfadsd6z from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Jet Real Estate Group

Jet Real Estate Group, LLC sought protection for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No.
20-05584) on Nov. 11, 2020 listing under $1 million in both assets
and liabilities.  Benjamin Carson at Benjamin Carson Law Office
serves as the Debtor's counsel.



JOSEPH M. THOMAS: Pehrssons Buying Erie City Properties for $1.05M
------------------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Martin Thomas, M.D., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale to Dale E.
Pehrsson and Robert S. Pehrsson of the following:

      (i) the real estate located at 2100 South Shore Drive, in
Erie, Pennsylvania, Tax Index No. 17-041-034.0-102.00 situate in
the City of Erie, County of Erie, and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
acquired by virtue of a Deed from Denise Illig Robison and Russell
Robison, her husband dated Nov. 29, 2000 and recorded on recorded
on Nov. 29, 2000 in Erie County Record Book 740, Page 873, for
$1.035 million, and

      (ii) the personal property owned by the Debtor for the total
purchase price of $12,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for June 3, 2021, at 11:30 a.m.  The
Objection Deadline is May 24, 2021.

The following named Respondents either appear to have liens on the
real property and/or personal property which is the subject of this
sale, or alternatively, are named as Respondents for the purpose of
notifying them that a sale of the subject property, to which they
may have some claim, is being proposed:

     (a) PNC Bank, National Association is a banking institution
with a mailing address of PNC Bank, N.A., P.O. Box 94982,
Cleveland, Ohio 44101.  PNC is represented by Brian Nicholas,
Esquire, KML Law Group PC, 701 Market Street, Suite 5000,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106.  PNC is being named as a
Respondent as it is the holder of a first Mortgage on the property
located at 2100 South Shore Drive, Erie, Pennsylvania in the face
amount of $780,000 dated Sept. 9, 2009 and recorded on Sept. 18,
2009 in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds of Erie County,
Pennsylvania at Record Book 1591, Page 1529 and re-recorded on Dec.
7, 2009 at Record Book 1607, Page 1982.  It is believed that the
approximate balance due on this mortgage is $647,171.24, plus
interest and satisfaction costs.  

     (b) Tax Collector, City of Erie, is a taxing authority with a
mailing address of 626 State Street, Room 105, Erie, Pennsylvania
16501-1128.  The Tax Collector, City of Erie is being named as a
Respondent in regard to the real estate taxes that will be due on
the subject property for the year 2021.  

     (c) The Erie County Tax Claim Bureau has a mailing address of
140 West Sixth Street, Room 110, Erie, Pennsylvania 16501.  The
Erie County Tax Claim Bureau has a statutory lien for delinquent
2020 real estate taxes in the amount of $39,294.75, plus continuing
interest at the rate of 9% per annum from March 1, 2021.

     (d) The United States of America, Internal Revenue Service is
an agency of the United States Government.  The United States of
America, Internal Revenue Service is being named as a Respondent as
the following Federal Tax Liens have been entered in the Court of
Common Pleas of Erie County, Pennsylvania: (i) Federal Tax Lien
entered on June 15, 2018 at Case No. 30954-2018 in the amount of
$255,140.32; and (ii) Federal Tax Lien entered on July 9, 2018 at
Case No. 31126-2018 in the amount of $187,570.67.

     (e) The Respondent, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dept. of
Revenue, is being named as a Respondent because the following liens
have been entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County,
Pennsylvania: (i) Tax Lien entered on Dec. 10, 2018 at Case No.
32118-2018 in the amount of $38,193.59 and (ii) Tax Lien entered on
Feb. 4, 2019 at Case No. 30321-2019 in the amount of $20,512.12.

     (f) The Respondents, Dale E. Pehrsson and Robert S. Pehrsson,
have a mailing address of 1 Golden Eagle Lane, Clarion,
Pennsylvania 16214 and are being named as a Respondents because
they are the prospective purchasers of the subject property.   They
are represented by Eugene C. Sundberg, Jr., Esquire, and the Marsh
Law Firm, 300 State Street, Suite 300, Erie, Pennsylvania
16507.

The Debtor holds such title to the property the Bankruptcy Code
confers upon him.   Based upon market comparables, and consistent
with the most recent listing price for the property, it is believed
and therefore averred that the fair market value of the property is
approximately $1.15 million.  Multiple parties were interested in
and viewed the property, and the initial offer accepted was for
$1.065 million.

However, home and pool inspections revealed certain deficiencies in
the property that warranted a price reduction to $1.035 million.
It is believed and therefore averred that the potential value of
those deficiencies may be greater than the amount of the price
reduction.  As a result, the Debtor submits that the amount
represents that highest and best offer currently available.   

The Debtor has secured an offer for the real estate from the Buyers
in the amount of $1.035 million on the terms of their Agreement for
the Sale of Real Estate, as well as an Addendum to Agreement of
Sale executed after property inspection.

Contingent upon approval of the sale of the real estate, the
prospective purchasers have also submitted an offer to purchase
various items of personal property owned by the Debtor for the
total purchase price of $12,000 more fully described in Exhibit C.


The Debtor consulted with a former broker of like personal property
in determining the purchase price for the same, which the
consultant agreed to do at no charge to the Debtor.  Based on the
consultant's knowledge of market comparables, in consultation with
the Debtor and his Court-approved realtor, the Debtor submits that
the purchase price for the personal property represents the fair
market value of the same.  

The real and/or personal property proposed to be sold either
appears to be validly encumbered by the liens identified at Exhibit
D, or alternatively, the Respondents identified at Exhibit D, are
being notified of the proposed sale in order to divest and transfer
any potential lien or claim they may have to the subject property.


The Debtor believes that the offer of $1.035 million for the real
property and of $12,000 for the items of personal property are fair
and should be accepted.  He proposes that the encumbrances and
other claims identified at Exhibit D, to the extent that they
validly encumber the subject property, be divested and transferred
to the proceeds of sale.

He also proposes that the funds created by the sale be subject to
the prior payment of all administrative costs and expenses allowed
by the Court, including, but not limited to the filing fee for the
Motion to Sell Real Property of the Estate Free and Clear of Liens
in the amount of $188, as well as the actual out-of-pocket costs
for advertising in both the Erie Times News and the Erie County
Legal Journal.

The Debtor also proposes payment of all usual and ordinary costs of
sale, including, but not limited to, the following:

     a) Payment of no more than $1,500.00 in fees to be paid to the
closing agent who represents the Debtor at the time of the real
estate closing;  

     b) Any and all municipal fees, as well as any and all water,
sewer, and refuse charges, if applicable;  

     c) Payment of any and all delinquent real estate taxes in the
approximate amount of $39,294.75, plus continuing interest at the
rate of 9% per annum from March 1, 2021;  

     d) Current real estate taxes, pro-rated to the date of
closing;

     e) The sale is being proposed pursuant to Dr. Thomas' Amended
Plan of Reorganization dated April 1, 2021 and, as such, will be
exempt from all realty transfer taxes pursuant to Section 1146(a).


     f) Payment of the Court approved realtor commission of 4.5% in
the amount of $47,925;

     g) The sum of $10,470 (1% of the combined purchase price of
the real estate and personal property) will be paid the Office of
the United States Trustee on account of quarterly U.S. Trustee's
fees due in regard to the disbursements made at the time of the
real estate closing.  

     h) Payment on the full amount of the first mortgage lien on
the real estate located at 2100 South Shore Drive, Erie,
Pennsylvania in favor of PNC Bank, National Association, in the
approximate principal amount of $647,171.24, plus interest and
satisfaction costs.  

     i) Payment on the full amount of the secured tax lien on the
real estate located at 2100 South Shore Drive, Erie, Pennsylvania
in favor of the Internal Revenue Service in the approximate
principal amount of $239,176.77, plus interest and satisfaction
costs, which shall be placed in escrow pending any offset from the
Debtor’s future tax filings.

     j.) Payment on the full amount of the secured tax lien on the
real estate located at 2100 South Shore Drive, Erie, Pennsylvania
in favor of the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue in the
approximate principal amount of $22,185.11, plus interest and
satisfaction costs.

     k) The net proceeds from the sale, after payment of the
disbursements outlined, which are estimated to be approximately
$21,000, will be paid to Debtor’s Counsel, Michael P. Kruszewski,
Esquire and the Quinn Law Firm, to be held in its escrow account,
on account of the administrative claims of the Debtor, Joseph
Martin Thomas.

The proceeds from the sale of the personal property in the amount
of $12,000 will be paid to the Debtor's Counsel, Michael P.
Kruszewski, Esq., and the Quinn Law Firm, to be held in its escrow
account, on account of the administrative claims of the Debtor.

A copy of the Agreement and Exhibits is available at
https://tinyurl.com/m3f44zbh from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Joseph Martin Thomas sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa.
Case No. 20-10334) on May 6, 2020.  The Debtor tapped Michael P.
Kruszewski, Esq., at The Quinn Law Firm as counsel.



KINTARA THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $6.6-Mil. Net Loss in Third Quarter
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kintara Therapeutics, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $6.64 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021,
compared to a net loss of $1.96 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2020.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2021, the Company reported a
net loss of $31.57 million compared to a net loss of $5.30 million
for the nine months ended March 31, 2020.  

The increase in loss for the nine months ended March 31, 2021
compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2020 was largely due to
the recognition of $16.1 million of non-cash expenses related to
the acquisition of in-process research and development costs
associated with the merger with Adgero Biopharmaceuticals Holdings,
Inc. and an expanded rate of expenditures with the initiation of
the GCAR study and REM-001 development.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $18.85 million in total
assets, $2.74 million in total liabilities, and $16.12 million in
total stockholders' equity.

At March 31, 2021, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $15.7 million.  The cash and cash equivalents at
March 31, 2021 are expected to be sufficient to fund the Company's
planned operations into the second quarter of calendar year 2022.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1498382/000156459021027558/ktra-10q_20210331.htm

                           About Kintara

Located in San Diego, California, Kintara (formerly DelMar
Pharmaceuticals) is dedicated to the development of novel cancer
therapies for patients with unmet medical needs. Kintara is
developing two late-stage, Phase 3-ready therapeutics for clear
unmet medical needs with reduced risk development programs.  The
two programs are VAL-083 for GBM and REM-001 for CMBC.

Kintara reported a net loss of $9.13 million for the year ended
June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $8.05 million for the year
ended June 30, 2019.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $2.94
million in total assets,
$2.67 million in total liabilities, and $263,214 in total
stockholders' equity.


LATAM BRASIL: Outsources Ground Agents as Restructuring Continues
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Joao Machado of Airline Geeks reports that as LATAM Airlines Group
reshuffles its operations and cleans up its financial situation as
a part of its Chapter 11 bankruptcy process, the group's branches
continue their streamlining and cost-cutting measures.  The latest
agreement -- and one of the most relevant with respect to labour
relations so far -- was announced this week at LATAM Brasil.  In an
internal announcement, the company announced it would be
outsourcing its ground agent jobs at almost all Brazilian
airports.

According to Brazilian aviation outlet Aeroin, the change in the
sourcing of the airline's ground handling will be effective from
the second week of May, with the exception of three airports, some
of the most important in LATAM Brasil's domestic network:
Brasília, Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo.

In Its internal communications, Aeroin reports, the company has
told its employees that "the hiring of partners to undertake these
operations at LATAM is in line with the market and follows a
worldwide trend in the providing of services of this kind of
specialized service," adding that "this is an important measure at
the moment, contributing to the economic sustainability of the
company."

From the start of the pandemic, and especially after the entry of
the group and subsequently, of the Brazilian branch in the Chapter
11 process, the airline is engaged in the revision of labor costs.
While its major competitors -- Azul Brazilian Airlines and GOL
Airlines -- signed temporary labour revision agreements, LATAM
Brasil tried to permanently reduce the salary of its flight crews.
Met by huge backlash, especially from the National Union of
Aeronauts, all potential agreements were rejected by the affected
employees, even after 2,700 of those workers were fired.

LATAM Brasil said it had to pay as much as 30% more than its peers,
which forced the revision as a matter of survival and maintaining
competitiveness in the market.

The message ends by saying, "We know this is a tough and hard
decision to be made, but it's a necessary one.  This way, we
reinforce our respect to all affected employees and thank [them]
immensely for the dedication, commitment and time of service to our
airline. Parallelly, we continue working strongly to contribute to
the professional relocation of these people."

In Brazil, at many times the outsourcing might be a faster process
than is thought, with the same employees shifted directly from the
airlines to the outsourcing companies.

Finally, LATAM Brasil confirmed the decision in a press release,
saying that "aware of its economic and social responsibility, LATAM
is already in touch with the unions representing the impacted
category to discuss the conditions and create an additional viable
leave package, in addition to making all efforts to contribute with
the professional relocation of all people impacted by this change.
The airline created a website for curriculum register and will
recommend the professionals to other companies."

                   About LATAM Airlines Group

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. -- http://www.latam.com/-- is a
pan-Latin American airline holding company involved in the
transportation of passengers and cargo and operates as one unified
business enterprise. It is the largest passenger airline in South
America.

Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, LATAM offered passenger
transport services to 145 different destinations in 26 countries,
including domestic flights in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia,
Ecuador and Peru, and international services within Latin America
as well as to Europe, the United States, the Caribbean, Oceania,
Asia and Africa.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter - Latin America on May
6, 2021, S&P Global Ratings lowered the ratings on Latam Airlines
Group S.A.'s EETC-2015 1 Class A certificates to 'CCC-'(sf) from
'CCC'(sf) and on Class B certificates to 'CC'(sf) from 'CCC-'(sf).
Subsequently, S&P withdrew the ratings.

LATAM and its 28 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11254) on May 25, 2020.  Affiliates in
Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the United States are part of
the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors disclosed $21,087,806,000 in total assets and
$17,958,629,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, FTI Consulting as restructuring advisor, Lee
Brock Camargo Advogados as local Brazilian litigation counsel, and
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Claro & Cia in Chile as special
counsel. The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. and The Boston
Consulting Group UK LLP serve as the Debtors' strategic advisors.
Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
tapped Dechert LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP as conflicts counsel, UBS
Securities LLC as investment banker, and Conway MacKenzie, LLC as
financial advisor.  Ferro Castro Neves Daltro & Gomide Advogados,
is the committee's Brazilian counsel.

The Ad Hoc Group of LATAM Bondholders tapped White & Case LLP as
counsel.


LEONARD R. COSTANTINI, III: Northwest Buying Rose Ridge for $1.35M
------------------------------------------------------------------
Northwest Land 1014, LP, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania to authorize it to buy Leonard R.
Costantini, III's two parcels of real property located at 4769
Gibsonia Road, in Allison Park, Pennsylvania 15101, Parcel ID
1216-E-00281-0000-00, which was recorded in the Allegheny County
Recorder of Deeds Book Volume 15153, Page 70 and
1215-R-00121-0000-00, which was recorded in the Allegheny County
Recorder of Deeds Book Volume 12407, Page 442, respectively,
referred to as Rose Ridge, for $1.35 million.

A hearing on the Motion is set for May 26, 2021, at 1:30 p.m.

The Debtor owns Rose Ridge.

Since the filing of the case, the Movant has made an offer to
purchase the property for cash immediately upon a sale order.  The
purchase price for the Real Property is $1.35 million.

The Respondents which may hold liens, claims, and encumbrances
against Rose Ridge are as follows: (i) H&M Holdings Group LLC, (ii)
Township of West Deer, (iii) County of Allegheny, (iv) Deer Lakes
School District, and (v) Midland Funding LLC.

The liens, claims, and encumbrances, if any, are hereby transferred
to the proceeds of the sale, if and to the extent that they may be
determined to be valid liens against the Real Property sold in
accordance with their validity or priority.

The Movant avers that the within offer is in the best interests of
the estate and its creditors, and that the proposed sale is fair
and reasonable.

The Movant respectfully asks that the Court enters an Order
approving the sale of the Real Property free and clear of all
liens, claims, and encumbrances.

A copy of the Letter of Intent is available at
https://tinyurl.com/5m499wwm from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

The Purchaser:

          NORTHWEST LAND 1014, LP
          375 Golfside Drive
          Wexford, PA 15090

Leonard R. Costantini, III sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
W.D. Pa. Case No. 20-23376) on Dec. 4, 2020.  The Debtor tapped
Robert Lampl, Esq., as counsel.



MATCH GROUP: Moody's Rates New $400MM Incremental Term Loan 'Ba1'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed Match Group, Inc.'s ("Match"
or the "company") Ba2 Corporate Family Rating and Ba2-PD
Probability of Default Rating. Concurrently, Moody's affirmed the
Ba1 ratings on the senior secured bank credit facilities and Ba3
ratings on the senior unsecured notes residing at Match Group
Holdings II, LLC ("Holdings II"), a wholly-owned second tier
holding company. Moody's also assigned a Ba1 rating to the $400
million incremental delayed draw term loan A facility that was
recently issued by Holdings II. The Speculative Grade Liquidity is
unchanged at SGL-1. The outlook was revised to stable from
negative.

On March 26, 2021, Match amended its bank credit agreement to issue
an optional $400 million incremental delayed draw term loan A
facility (DDTLA)[1]. Net proceeds from the DDTLA, if drawn, may be
used to finance the cash portion of the $1.725 billion purchase
price for the acquisition of Hyperconnect, an online social
discovery platform, which is expected to close in Q2 2021. While
Match intends to finance the purchase with a 50/50 mix of cash and
newly issued Match common shares, the DDTLA provides Match with an
additional potential source of funding in the event the company
were to revise down the equity portion of the funding mix and/or
use less cash-on-hand. At March 31, 2021, cash and cash equivalents
totaled approximately $846 million. The DDTLA is secured to the
same collateral package as Match's existing bank credit facilities.
No amounts were outstanding on the DDTLA at March 31, 2021 or as of
the date of the Q1 2021 earnings call on May 5, 2021.

Following is a summary of the rating actions:

Assignment:

Issuer: Match Group Holdings II, LLC

$400 Million Incremental Delayed Draw Term Loan A due March 2022,
Assigned Ba1 (LGD2)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Match Group, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed at Ba2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed at Ba2-PD

Issuer: Match Group Holdings II, LLC

$750 Million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility due 2025,
Affirmed at Ba1 (LGD2)

$425 Million Senior Secured Term Loan B due 2027, Affirmed at Ba1
(LGD2)

$450 Million 5.000% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2027, Affirmed at
Ba3 (LGD5)

$500 Million 4.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2028, Affirmed at
Ba3 (LGD5)

$350 Million 5.625% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2029, Affirmed at
Ba3 (LGD5)

$500 Million 4.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2030, Affirmed at
Ba3 (LGD5)

Speculative Grade Liquidity Actions:

Issuer: Match Group, Inc.

Speculative Grade Liquidity, Unchanged at SGL-1

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Match Group Holdings II, LLC

Outlook, Assigned Stable

Issuer: Match Group, Inc.

Outlook, Changed to Stable from Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

The revision of the outlook to stable reflects Match's strong
reacceleration of top-line revenue growth in Q1 2021 (+23%
year-over-year, +2.5% quarter-over-quarter) coupled with EBITDA
margin expansion, and Moody's expectation that operating
performance will remain robust over the coming year as the global
economy recovers. Strong performance in Q1 2021 was driven by a
recovery in à la carte revenue at Tinder (accounts for about 60%
of Match's revenue), optimized pricing and rapid growth at Hinge,
one-to-many live streaming video at PlentyOfFish and growth in the
company's average subscribers (+12% yoy) and ARPU (+9% yoy) in
North America and overseas markets. Despite an uneven recovery
across the world, with the US and certain Western European
countries reopening at a faster pace than other countries, offset
by weakness across India, Brazil, Japan and some European markets,
Moody's expects Match to repeat 20%+ yoy revenue growth in Q2 2021.
The company has guided to yoy revenue and EBITDA growth at the high
end of the mid-to high teens percentage range in 2021. Given that
roughly 66% of Match's operating expenses are variable, as revenue
accelerates, Moody's forecasts operating expenses to rise over the
course of the year, particularly marketing and selling expenses,
which will help stimulate demand and offset increasing competition.
However, this will likely cap operating margin expansion.

Notwithstanding the demand recovery in the services sector expected
in 2021-22 boosted by the economic rebound, the rating considers
the lingering economic scarring from the recession that could
affect consumers' purchasing behavior given the income weakness
within some demographic segments and risks associated with the
timing of the abatement of the pandemic. Offsetting these risks is
Moody's view that improving business conditions coupled with
greater reopening of bars, restaurants and other social gathering
venues globally will lead to increased out-of-home mobility and
support growth in user activity and engagement on Match's online
dating applications ("apps"). This will facilitate vigorous
expansion of EBITDA and de-leveraging at a faster-than-expected
pace approaching the 4x downgrade threshold by year end 2021 with
further decreases thereafter (barring sizable debt-financed M&A)
and strong free cash flow (FCF) generation. At March 31, 2021,
Match's total debt to EBITDA was 4.6x, retained cash flow to net
debt was 26% and FCF was $781 million, equivalent to roughly 20%
FCF to debt (all metrics are Moody's adjusted). The company has
publicly committed to returning net leverage to under its
as-reported leverage target of 3x net debt to EBITDA (equivalent to
around 4x total debt to EBITDA as calculated by Moody's) by year
end 2021.

The affirmation of the Ba2 CFR reflects Match's market position as
the leading global provider in the online dating category; (ii)
high growth profile evidenced by share gains and strong secular
adoption of its online dating apps to find romantic partners; and
(iii) Tinder brand, which is the number one grossing global dating
app positioned in the faster growth "freemium app" segment of the
market. The rating is supported by robust debt protection measures
and a track record of deleveraging under its as-reported leverage
target of 3x net debt to EBITDA via strong EBITDA growth, which
Moody's expects to transpire over the rating horizon. Following
last year's spin-off from former parent IAC/InterActiveCorp, free
cash flow conversion has improved compared to prior years due to
the absence of dividends since the separation, which Moody's
projects to continue as the company allocates excess cash to growth
investments. There is good revenue diversification across
geographies and products with a broad portfolio of non-Tinder
dating brands comprising around 40% of revenue. Moody's expects
that Match will effectively manage potential customer acquisition
volatility that could arise as a result of Google's phase-out of
third-party cookie data and Apple's recent implementation of
privacy-focused changes that require all app developers to ask
users' permissions to collect tracking data. Moody's forecasts
adjusted EBITDA margins (as calculated by Moody's) in the 33%-35%
area, buttressed by 15%-20% yoy revenue growth and Moody's
projection that G-20 economies will collectively expand by 5.3% in
2021.

The Ba2 rating is constrained by Match's moderately high financial
leverage and narrow business focus in a highly competitive industry
with revenue concentration in the Tinder brand. Given minimal entry
barriers, Match faces significant competition from a multitude of
smaller players, such as Meet Group and Bumble, as well as larger
players like Facebook. Despite Match's strong historical and future
growth trends, there may be periods of weaker-than-expected revenue
growth due to economic shocks, heightened competition, lower ARPU,
reduced user traffic or higher customer churn, which weighs on the
rating. Additionally, margins could experience pressure as Match
invests in new geographies, product development, customer
acquisition, marketing and data analytics to retain and attract
subscribers to its dating apps. The online dating market is
susceptible to sudden changes in consumer engagement and rapidly
evolving technology that could lead to declines in user activity
and impact payer conversion and monetization. Moody's expects Match
to continue to invest in technology, including machine learning and
data science, as well as new product features to sustain high user
engagement.

Over the next 12-15 months, Moody's expects Match to maintain very
good liquidity (SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating) supported
by the company's "asset-lite" operating model that facilitates
meaningful free cash flow conversion in the 80%-85% range and high
cash balances (cash and cash equivalents totaled roughly $846
million at March 31, 2021). Moody's projects free cash flow over
the next twelve months in the $800-$900 million range. External
liquidity is supported by a $750 million revolving credit facility
(RCF) and the new $400 million DDTLA, which provide ample alternate
liquidity for M&A and growth opportunities.

Moody's Loss Given Default model excludes the exchangeable notes
given their equity-like feature and potential redemption via stock
in the future. Moody's assumes borrowings under the revolver and
DDTLA and applied a -1 notch override on the credit facilities'
ratings given the potential for a higher mix of secured debt in the
future to support acquisitions or refinancing activity.

The coronavirus outbreak, the government measures put in place to
contain it, and the weak global economic outlook continue to
disrupt economies and credit markets across sectors and regions.
Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the performance of
corporate assets arising from the current weakness in US and
overseas economic activity and gradual recovery over the coming
months. Although an economic recovery is underway, it is tenuous
and its continuation will be closely tied to containment of the
virus. As a result, the degree of uncertainty around Moody's
forecasts is unusually high. Moody's regards the coronavirus
outbreak as a social risk under its ESG framework, given the
substantial implications for public health and safety.

A social impact that Moody's considers in Match's credit profile is
the increasing usage of online dating and social networking
platforms that help users find potential matches for friendship,
dating, discovery and networking, which will continue to benefit
Match and support solid revenue and EBITDA growth fundamentals over
the next several years. Given that Match is entrusted with
sensitive user data, Moody's notes that potential data privacy
breaches could prompt some consumers to avoid using the company's
dating apps thereby increasing social risk. Offsetting this risk is
the company's continuing focus and increasing investment and
training in its information security, privacy and user safety
programs across all of its dating apps.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade could occur if Match exhibits revenue growth and EBITDA
margin expansion leading to consistent retained cash flow to net
debt of at least 23% and leverage sustained near 3x total debt to
EBITDA (all metrics are Moody's adjusted).

Ratings could be downgraded if a decline in revenue or higher
operating expenses led to EBITDA margin contraction or total debt
to EBITDA sustained above 4x. There would be downward pressure on
ratings if EBITDA were to weaken resulting in retained cash flow to
net debt sustained below 15% (all metrics are Moody's adjusted).

Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Match Group, Inc. is a leading
online dating provider via its major brands in 40 languages
globally. Revenue totaled approximately $2.5 billion for the twelve
months ended March 31, 2021.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.


MAXIMUS INC: Moody's Assigns First Time 'Ba2' Corp Family Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to Maximus,
Inc., including a Ba2 corporate family rating, Ba2-PD probability
of default rating and Ba2 ratings to the proposed senior secured
revolving credit facility expiring 2026, term loan A due 2026 and
term loan B due 2028. The speculative grade liquidity rating is
SGL-1. The outlook is stable.

On April 20, Maximus agreed to acquire Veterans Evaluation Services
("VES") for $1.4 billion in cash. On March 1, Maximus acquired the
federal division of Attain, LLC for $430 million in cash. The net
proceeds of the proposed facilities will be used to acquire VES and
refinance existing debt.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba2 CFR reflects Maximus's large contract base, with an over $7
billion contract backlog today, and long operating history as an
on-shore, outsourced business process service provider to large,
mostly healthcare-focused government entities. Moody's expects debt
to EBITDA will decline towards 2.5 times from over 3.0 times as of
March 31, 2021, pro forma for the proposed financing and VES
acquisition, over the next 12 to 18 months. Moody's anticipates
organic revenue contraction in a low single digit percent range in
FY2022 (ends September 30) due to the wind-down of the company's
COVID-19 response work and of its 2020 US Census contract. However,
a resumption of revenue growth in the mid single digit range is
expected thereafter. Further rating support is provided by
anticipated EBITDA margins around 16%, EBITDA less capital
expenditures to interest expense well above 7 times and annual free
cash flow of at least $200 million. Modest annual capital
expenditures of about 1% to 2% of revenues are expected. Costs from
the two large 2021 acquisitions will weigh on near term
profitability rates.

All financial metrics cited reflect Moody's standard adjustments.

Maximus has high customer concentration, with 20 contracts
accounting for around 64% of revenue in the LTM period ended March
31, 2021. However, demand for outsourced services is expected to
grow with government healthcare payments over the near to medium
term. Maximus's roster of clients includes the US Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS"), the New York State Department
of Health and the UK Department of Work & Pensions, with whom
Maximus has maintained many years of contract renewals and high
satisfaction ratings. The purchase of VES will make its
Compensation and Pension ("C&P") Medical Disability Examinations
("MDEs") work for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA")
its second largest customer behind CMS. Expected growth in MDEs
delivered by its over 5,000 credentialed medical providers is a key
driver of Moody's anticipation of renewed revenue growth after
2022.

Moody's considers the business process outsourcing services market
highly competitive, with limited barriers to competitive entry.
Government preferences for on-shore service providers is a key
differentiator provided by Maximus's over 30,000 employees, many
located in the markets that they serve. Price competition among
providers is keen, but high service quality and positive references
from customers are also key determinants of new contract wins and
"no bid" contract renewals. Technology acquired with Attain could
help further differentiate Maximus's service offerings by adding
its predictive analytics and other service enhancements.

Demographic trends including an aging US population and demands for
data security and a high quality of service from government
healthcare and other programs provide support for Maximus's revenue
growth. These underlying societal trends are considered positive
social input factors to the ratings. Maintaining a positive track
record and reputation for effectiveness by its government customers
and the underlying program beneficiaries is a critical
consideration for Maximus to remain competitive. As a business
services provider, Maximus does not exhibit material environmental
risks.

Before VES and Attain in 2021, Maximus had not made large,
debt-funded acquisitions and had operated without much financial
leverage, other than from a revolving credit facility, for many
years. The twin debt funded acquisitions in rapid succession lead
Moody's to consider Maximus's financial strategies as opportunistic
and evolving. As a public company, Maximus provides transparency
into its governance and financial results and goals. The majority
of its board of directors are independent. Near-term capital
allocation priorities include financial leverage reduction.

Moody's views Maximus's liquidity as very good, reflected in the
SGL-1 rating. The company is expected to have around $100 million
of cash when the VES purchase closes and over $400 million of the
$600 million revolver available. Moody's expects Maximus will
generate at least $200 million of free cash flow, well in excess of
around $65 million of required term loan amortization. The
revolving credit facility and term loan A are subject to
maintenance of a maximum Consolidated Total Leverage Ratio (net of
up to $75 million of cash) of not greater than 4.0 times, or 4.5
times following a permitted acquisition (as defined), and a minimum
Interest Coverage Ratio (to be defined in the loan agreement) of
not less than 3.0 times. Moody's anticipates Maximus will remain
well within compliance of both financial covenants over the next 12
to 15 months.

The Ba2 ratings on Maximus's senior secured credit facilities
reflect both the Ba2-PD PDR and a loss given default assessment of
LGD3. The senior secured credit facilities benefit from secured
guarantees from all existing and subsequently acquired wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries. As there is no other material debt in the
capital structure, the facilities are rated in line with the Ba2
CFR.

The senior secured credit facility agreement will include
provisions permitting incremental debt capacity up to the sum of:
1) the greater of: a) $630 million; and b) consolidated EBITDA for
the most recent trailing 12 month period; 2) in the case of debt
secured pari passu with the existing secured debt, the maximum
amount that can be incurred without causing the Consolidated Net
Senior Secured Leverage Ratio to exceed its level as of the
facility closing date. No portion of the incremental capacity may
be incurred with an earlier maturity than the initial term loans.
Subject to certain limitations, Maximus will be permitted to
designate any existing or subsequently acquired or organized
non-borrower subsidiary as an "unrestricted subsidiary", subject to
carve-out capacity and other conditions. There are no express
"blocker" provisions which prohibit the transfer of material or
specified assets to unrestricted subsidiaries. Non-wholly-owned
subsidiaries are not required to provide guarantees; dividends or
transfers resulting in partial ownership of subsidiary guarantors
could jeopardize guarantees, with a protective provision requiring
majority lender consent for any guarantee releases, if required
under the credit agreement. There are no express protective
provisions prohibiting an up-tiering transaction.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations for steady
financial leverage declines and at least $200 million of free cash
flow.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if 1) Maximus diversifies and grows
its contract and customer base, 2) EBITDA margins remain around
18%; 3) Moody's expects debt to EBITDA below 2.5 times; and 4)
Maximus gains greater financial flexibility through less reliance
on secured debt financing sources.

The ratings could be downgraded if: 1) there are material customer
losses; 2) revenue does not grow; 3) EBITDA margins remain below
15%; 4) Moody's expects debt to EBITDA will remain above 3.5 times;
5) free cash flow to debt remains below 10%; or 6) Maximus adopts
more aggressive financial strategies, including large debt funded
acquisitions or share repurchases.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Issuer: Maximus, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned Ba2

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned Ba2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-1

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned Ba2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Term Loan A, Assigned Ba2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Term Loan B, Assigned Ba2 (LGD3)

Outlook, Assigned Stable

Maximus (NYSE:MMS), headquartered in Reston, Virginia, is a
business process services contractor focused on health and human
services programs for the US federal, state and non-US governments.
Moody's expects revenue of over $4 billion in FY2022 (ends
September 30).

VES provides outsourced C&P MDE contracting for the VA. Attain is a
US federal government contractor providing digital transformation
and artificial intelligence solutions.


MCGEHEE PARK: Plan Confirmation Hearing Slated for June 24
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge William R. Sawyer approved the Disclosure Statement
explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of McGehee Park Apartments, subject
to certain amendments on the record.  Judge Sawyer set the
confirmation hearing on the Plan on June 24, 2021 at 10 a.m., by
telephone.  

                   About McGehee Park Apartments

McGehee Park Apartments is a single asset real estate (as defined
in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

McGehee Park Apartments filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Ala. Case No.
20-32590) on Dec. 29, 2020.  Michael King, sole member, signed the
petition.  In the petition, the Debtor disclosed assets of between
$1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge William R. Sawyer oversees the case.

Memory Memory & Causby, LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.

Fannie Mae is represented by:

     Matthew M. Cahill, Esq.
     Rita L. Hullett, Esq.
     BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN,
     CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, PC
     420 20th Street North, Suite 1400
     Birmingham, AL 35203
     Tel: (205) 328-0480
     Fax: (205) 322-8007
     E-mail: mcahill@bakerdonelson.com
             @bakerdonelson.com


MERION INC: Incurs $297,640 Net Loss in First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------
Merion, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $297,640 on
$435,362 of total sales for the three months ended March 31, 2021,
compared to a net loss of $592,770 on $65,988 of total sales for
the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $1.22 million in total
assets, $1.61 million in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $382,473.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had a cash balance of
approximately $6,000, compared to a cash balance of approximately
$10,000 at Dec. 31, 2020.

Merion said, "In assessing our liquidity, we monitor and analyze
our cash on-hand and our operating and capital expenditure
commitments. Our liquidity needs are to meet our working capital
requirements, operating expenses and capital expenditure
obligations.  Other than operating expenses and current liabilities
of approximately $1.0 million, the Company does not have
significant cash commitments. Cash requirements include cash needed
for purchase of inventory, payroll, payroll taxes, rent, and other
operating expenses.  However, in response to the liquidity factors
described above, the Company has continued to find ways to reduce
its operating expenses. In addition, should our Company need funds,
our principal shareholder and Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Mr. Dinghua Wang may lend additional money to the Company from time
to time to the extent he is in a position and willing to do so.  No
assurance can be provided that he will continue to lend funds to
the Company in the future."

"Management has concluded under U.S. GAAP that there is substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as a result
of our lack of significant revenue and sufficient working capital.
If we are unable to generate significant revenue or secure
financing, we may be required to cease or limit our operations.
Our financial statements do not include adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1517498/000147793221003160/ewlu_10q.htm

                           About Merion

Merion, Inc. is a provider of health and nutritional supplements
and personal care products based in West Covina, California.
Currently, the Company is mainly selling its products over the
Internet directly to end-user customers through its websites,
www.dailynu.com and www.merionus.com, and to wholesale distributors
through phone and electronic communication.

Merion reported a net loss of $1.82 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $722,404 for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $1.38 million
in total assets, $1.55 million in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $168,767.

Flushing, New York-based Wei, Wei & Co., LLP, the Company's auditor
since 2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated March 30, 2021, citing that the Company has incurred
significant losses, has negative working capital and lacks
significant revenues.  The ability of the Company to continue as a
going concern is dependent on raising capital and ultimately to
attain profitable operations.  Accordingly, the Company has
determined that these factors raise substantial doubt as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern for a period of
one year from the issuance of these financial statements.


MIAMI JEWISH: Fitch Affirms BB+ Rating on $44MM Series 2017 Bonds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB+' Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to
the Miami Jewish Health Systems and Subsidiaries (MJHS or the
system) and affirmed the following bonds issued by the city of
Miami Health Facilities Authority on behalf of MJHS at 'BB+':

-- $44,035,000 revenue and refunding bonds series 2017.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a pledge of gross revenues and a mortgage
on certain property of the obligated group (OG), which includes
MJHS, the Florida PACE Centers and the Miami Jewish Health
Foundation, Inc.

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

The 'BB+' rating for MJHS reflects the system's mixed demand
characteristics, with softer independent living (IL) occupancy
balanced by good demand across other continuum of care services, an
operating risk profile that incorporates the operating challenges
over the past two years and an expected improvement in performance,
and adequate levels of unrestricted liquidity that had been
weakened by the operating losses and one-time expenses, including a
payout to terminate MJHS' defined benefit plan but has been buoyed
in FY21 by an influx of proceeds from the sale of a non-obligated
asset. The rating also incorporates the application of an
asymmetric risk factor related to MJHS' exposure to government
payors in two of its main service lines -- skilled nursing and the
Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). Together
these service lines represent over 75% of the OG's revenues, and
government payors are the largest payor source for each of the
service lines.

Performance in FY21 has shown improvement, with the operating
losses narrowing, especially in the past few months. Fitch's
forward look shows operations reaching levels more consistent with
the rating level over the next two years. Capital spending is
expected to remain lower than depreciation and then gradually
increase closer to historical levels.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Defensibility: 'bb'

Mixed Demand Characteristics

The weaker revenue defensibility assessment reflects softer
occupancy in IL that is offset by good historical demand for
skilled nursing and PACE services. The census in all service lines,
except for PACE, have been affected by the coronavirus pandemic;
however, Fitch expects the overall census to improve in the next
year. The assessment also reflects Fitch's view that the lower IL
occupancy limits MJHS's rate flexibility.

Operating Risk: 'bb'

Turnaround Efforts Slowed by Pandemic

The weak operating risk assessment reflects the sizable operating
losses at MJHS over the past few years, with the operating ratio
climbing to above 110% and the net operating margin negative in
FY19 and FY20. Despite improvement in FY21, Fitch expects MJHS's
operating performance to remain largely consistent with the weak
operating profile assessment. Capital spending is expected to
remain below depreciation over the next two years. Fitch expects
MJHS will meet its debt service covenant in FY21.

Financial Profile: 'bb'

Steady Path to Recovery Through the Cycle

At YE 2020 (unaudited), MJHS had unrestricted cash-to-adjusted debt
of about 41.8% and MADS coverage of -0.7x (as calculated by Fitch).
Given MJHS's weak revenue defensibility and weak operating risk
assessments and Fitch's forward-looking scenario analysis, Fitch
expects MJHS's key leverage metrics to remain consistent with a
non-investment grade financial profile even as operations steadily
improve.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Growth in unrestricted liquidity such that cash to adjusted
    debt is expected to stabilize above 120%.

-- Improvement to cash flow such that debt service coverage is
    consistently around 3x.

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- A deterioration in unrestricted liquidity such that cash to
    adjusted debt falls below 45%.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

Founded in the 1940s as a 23-bed nursing home for Jewish widows and
widowers, MJHS has grown into a provider of a wide array of senior
services in South Florida. The OG consists of a 438-bed skilled
nursing facility, one of the largest in the Southeast, a 95-unit
rental ILU, 81-unit ALU, 19-unit memory care facility, and a small
32-bed acute care hospital, mostly catering to the needs of the
MJHS residents, all located on the system's main campus in Miami,
and a foundation. The OG operates a large PACE program with four
centers providing care to over 900 participants. Fitch's financial
analysis is based on the OG. The OG had approximately $134.3
million in operating revenue in FY20.

The main entities outside of the OG include the Wolf/Cypen
Foundation which operates exclusively for the benefit of MJHS, and
has approximately $7.5 million in unrestricted cash and
investments, as well as three HUD Section 202 apartment buildings
providing subsidized housing for the elderly, and a nurse registry
program.

REVENUE DEFENSIBILITY

Historically IL occupancy has averaged in the 70% to 80% range,
which is consistent with a weak revenue defensibility assessment.
The pandemic has led to IL occupancy dropping further to below 60%
in the most recent quarter. MLHS has historically had seasonal
rentals from Canadian snow birds and thus, the current border
closure with Canada has also affected IL occupancy. MJHS has had
much stronger demand for skilled nursing, with occupancy prior to
the pandemic generally above 90%, and for assisted living (AL),
which while lower than skilled nursing occupancy, had hovered in
the mid-to-high 80% range.

Demand in the PACE program has been strong, with MJHS able to fill
its allocation of members for the program. The census in MJHS'
32-bed acute care hospital continues to be challenged, with a daily
census generally under 10, and MJHS continues to seek ways to
utilize the available beds, such as for the coordination of care
for its PACE participants.

MJHS faces steady competition from a number of AL and skilled
nursing providers in the immediate service area. MJHS' primary
service area is a 10-mile radius surrounding the main campus in
downtown Miami, with the secondary service area a 20-mile radius
beyond that. While IL competition is limited in downtown Miami,
there are number of entrance fee IL providers in the broader east
coast Florida market, especially north of Miami, and Fitch views
MJHS' lower IL occupancy, albeit for a rental product, to reflect
both the demand for the product in the immediate service area and
the competition that exists from entrance fee IL campuses in the
greater region.

Service area demographics are mixed, with very good growth
characteristics offset by income levels lower than county and state
levels, a further indication of MJHS's limited ability to raise its
rates for the private pay services it provides. However, more than
80% of the OG's revenues is derived from government payors, which
sets the rates that MJHS receives and that limited rate flexibility
is reflected in the weaker revenue defensibility assessment.

OPERATING RISK

MJHS is a rental facility and has no contractual healthcare
liability for its independent living residents, which reduces a
certain amount of risk in MJHS' operating profile.

Nevertheless, the overall weak operating risk assessment reflects
the sizable operating losses at MJHS over the past few years, with
the operating ratio climbing to above 110% and the net operating
margin negative in FY19 and FY20. MJHS has implemented a turnaround
plan, which follows the recommendations in a report produced by a
consultant brought in after a debt service coverage violation in
FY19. While most of the recommendations have been implemented, the
coronavirus pandemic has slowed the progress of MJHS's financial
improvement, and the weak operating risk assessment reflects
Fitch's belief that while the operating performance will continue
to improve over the next two to three years, metrics will remain
more in line with the current performance.

Eight-month FY 21 results (June 30 year end), show an operating
ratio of 100.5% a marked improvement over FY20 year end operating
ratio, which was 110.6%. The improvement has been driven by good
utilization and reimbursement rates in the PACE program, but all
the major service lines have shown operational improvement in
recent months. Fitch expects MJHS to rebuild its IL, assisted
living, and skilled nursing occupancies over the next year. This
combined with 200 more PACE participants tentatively granted to
MJHS in Florida's FY22 budget, should continue to allow for an
improved operating performance.

After missing its debt service covenant each of the last two fiscal
years, Fitch expects MJHS to cover its debt above the covenant in
FY21. Fitch's expectation reflects the improved performance as well
as approximately $16 million in proceeds related to the sale of a
hospice company in which MJHS had a minority stake. The proceeds
are expected to be treated as investment income given that MJHS's
interest was a minority investment and the company was not operated
by MJHS. The proceeds have also helped materially improve MJHS'
unrestricted liquidity position. MJHS was given the opportunity to
invest in the company that acquired the hospice company and MJHS
has taken a small stake in that company. MJHS management reports
that in the near term the hospice company has been investing in
growth but that over the longer term the equity interest in the
company should begin to produce a return.

MJHS's capex has averaged a robust 172.5% of depreciation over the
last four years. With the completion in FY19 of its largest project
in process, a parking garage, capex spending lowered to 90.9% of
depreciation in FY20. Near-term capital expenditures are expected
to be limited to routine maintenance and smaller projects. An
average age of plant of 20 years as of 2020 is very elevated for
the rating level but reflects, in part, the sizable base of skilled
nursing beds, which generally carry a higher age of plant.

The EmpathiCare Village, a memory care project, which was expected
to start within the next two years, is currently on hold as MJHS
engages in a broader capital and strategic analysis. MJHS has hired
a consultant to do a capital and strategic review of MJHS, given,
among other items, the changes in healthcare and in senior living
that has occurred in recent years. The review is expected to be
completed in FY21, and potential capital projects will likely come
out of that process. Fitch has not factored any large projects into
the rating, including the EmpathiCare Village. With the improved
unrestricted liquidity position, MJHS has a measure of debt
capacity at the 'BB+' rating level, should operations continue to
improve as anticipated.

Currently MJHS has a manageable debt burden as indicated by maximum
annual debt service as a percentage of revenue of 2.4%, which is
very manageable. Revenue only coverage for MJHS is not a credit
factor given that MJHS is a rental model.

FINANCIAL PROFILE

Given MJHS's weak revenue defensibility and operating risk
assessments and Fitch's forward-looking scenario analysis, Fitch
expects key leverage metrics to remain consistent with a 'BB+'
rating, throughout the current economic and business cycle. As of
YE 2020, MJHS had unrestricted cash and investments of
approximately $17.9 million. This equates to about 41.8% of total
adjusted debt. MJHS has no debt equivalents as it fully funded its
defined pension plan and terminated in FY20. Days Cash on Hand
(DCOH) was at 44 days at year end 2020. The approximately $16
million in proceeds from MJHS's stake in the sale of the hospice
company has materially improved MJHS's unrestricted liquidity
position through interim FY21. As Feb. 28, 2021, MJHS had $32.4
million in unrestricted cash and investments, which equated to
76.5% cash to adjusted debt and 91 DCOH, which was slightly above
the covenant of 90 days.

Fitch's baseline scenario, which is a reasonable forward look of
financial performance over the next five years given current
economic expectations, shows MJHS maintaining operating and
financial metrics that are largely consistent with the current
rating. Capital spending is expected to be below depreciation over
this time, with no major projections currently factored into the
rating. Fitch's stress scenario assumes an economic stress (to
reflect equity volatility), which is specific to MJHS's asset
allocation. The forward look shows MJHS maintains cash-to-adjusted
debt levels that are consistent the BB+' rating throughout Fitch's
baseline scenario and cash to adjusted debt remains resilient even
under a potential stress case scenario. MADS coverage remains above
the covenant as well.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


MICHAEL FELICE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for June 24
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Vincent F. Papalia will consider the adequacy of the
Disclosure Statement explaining the First Modified Chapter 11 Plan
of Michael Felice Interiors LLC at a hearing on June 24, 2021, at
11 a.m., by phone via Court Solutions.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/3bzXnjY from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About Michael Felice Interiors

Michael Felice Interiors LLC --
https://www.michaelfeliceinteriors.com/ -- is a full-service design
firm located in Wyckoff, NJ.  It offers a large selection of
furniture, window coverings, carpet, lighting, and a gallery of
Hunter Douglas shades and blinds.

Michael Felice Interiors sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 20-11531) on Jan. 30, 2020.  The Debtor disclosed
total assets of $97,524 and total liabilities of $2,300,540.
SCURA, WIGFIELD, HEYER, STEVENS & CAMMAROTA, LLP, led by David L.
Stevens, is the Debtor's counsel.


MOHEGAN TRIBAL: Incurs $16 Million Net Loss in Second Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $15.97 million on $278.63 million of net revenues for
the three months ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of
$140.03 million on $314.70 million of net revenues for the three
months ended March 31, 2020.

For the six months ended March 31, 2021, the Company reported a net
loss of $42.73 million on $509.41 million of net revenues compared
to a net loss of $130.61 million on $713.75 million of net revenues
for the six months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $2.85 billion in total
assets, $2.99 billion in total liabilities, and a total capital of
($132.11 million).

"The March quarter was important in the evolution of MGE, as we
opened the Mohegan Sun Casino at Virgin Hotels Las Vegas -
representing MGE's latest expansion and entry in the significant
Las Vegas market," said Raymond Pineault, interim chief executive
officer.  "Continuing the trend of firsts, MGE, in partnership with
the Governor of the State of Connecticut and the Mashantucket
Pequot Tribe, reached an agreement to allow online gaming and
retail and mobile sports betting, which when approved by the
Connecticut Legislature, would expand MGE's online footprint while
providing further diversification to our business.  Additionally,
late in the quarter, MGE's INSPIRE project in Incheon, South Korea
received an important approval from South Korea's Ministry of
Culture, Sports and Tourism, clearing the path to obtain financing
for the project."

Additionally, Carol Anderson, chief financial officer of the
Company noted, "In the United States, our properties have continued
to recover, as the rate of vaccinations increases and states
continue to ease some COVID-related restrictions.  At our flagship
property Mohegan Sun, while revenues were below second quarter 2019
levels, which is the closest comparable due to property closures in
the second quarter of 2020, Adjusted EBITDA was $70.0 million,
17.9% favorable to the second quarter of 2019, while EBITDA margin
was up 1,212 bps over the same period. Outside of Connecticut,
performance at ilani in Washington State continues to surpass
expectations, while Mohegan Sun Pocono and Resorts are seeing
positive sequential momentum.  Finally, we look forward to
reopening the MGE Niagara Resorts as soon as we are given approval
from the government."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1005276/000100527621000010/mtga-20210331.htm

                       About Mohegan Tribal

The Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority d/b/a Mohegan Gaming &
Entertainment -- http://www.mohegangaming.com-- is primarily
engaged in the ownership, operation and development of integrated
entertainment facilities, both domestically and internationally,
including: (i) Mohegan Sun in Uncasville, Connecticut, (ii) Mohegan
Sun Pocono in Plains Township, Pennsylvania, (iii) Niagara
Fallsview Casino Resort, Casino Niagara and the 5,000-seat Niagara
Falls Entertainment Centre, all in Niagara Falls, Canada, (iv)
Resorts Casino Hotel in Atlantic City, New Jersey, (v) ilani Casino
Resort in Clark County, Washington, (vi) Paragon Casino Resort in
Marksville, Louisiana and (vii) INSPIRE Entertainment Resort, a
first-of-its-kind, multi-billion dollar integrated resort and
casino under construction at Incheon International Airport in South
Korea.

Mohegan Tribal reported a net loss of $162.02 million for the
fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.38
million for the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Dec. 31,
2020, the Company had $2.77 billion in total assets, $2.87 billion
in total liabilities, and a total capital of $93.60 million.

Deloitte & Touche LLP, in Hartford, Connecticut, the Company's
auditor since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Dec. 29, 2020, citing that certain tranches of the
Company's senior secured credit facilities mature on Oct. 13, 2021,
and the Company has determined that it will need to refinance these
near-term maturities in order to meet the debt obligations at
maturity, and the Company expects that without such a refinancing
it is probable that it will not have sufficient liquidity to meet
those debt obligations, and it may not be able to satisfy its
financial covenants under the senior secured credit facilities.
These conditions and events, when considered in the aggregate raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

                            *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Feb. 4, 2021, Moody's Investors Service
upgraded Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority's ("MTGA") Corporate
Family Rating to Caa1 from Caa2.  The upgrade considers that on
January 26, MTGA closed on a refinancing that had a meaningful
positive impact on the company's liquidity.


NASHEF LLC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru July
-------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts has
authorized Nashef LLC  to use cash collateral on an interim basis,
the terms and conditions of which, will be set forth in a separate
order.

A telephonic hearing on the matter is scheduled for July 22, 2021
at 10:30 a.m.

A copy of the Court's initial order is available for free at
https://bit.ly/2RX33O7 from PacerMonitor.com.

                          About Nashef LLC

Nashef LLC, a privately held company in Fitchburg, Mass.

Nashef LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 20-40199) on Feb. 6, 2020. In the
petition signed by Eyad Nashef, manager, the Debtor disclosed $170
in assets and $1,559,000 in liabilities.

Judge Christopher J. Panos oversees the case.

The Debtor is represented by James P. Ehrhard, Esq. at Ehrhard &
Associates, P.C.




NEUBASE THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $5.5-Mil. Net Loss in Second Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Neubase Therapeutics, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $5.52 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021,
compared to a net loss of $4.38 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2020.

For the six months ended March 31, 2021, the Company reported a net
loss of $9.59 million compared to a net loss of $8.88 million for
the six months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $27.47 million in total
assets, $3.53 million in total liabilities, and $23.94 million in
total stockholders' equity.

The Company expects to continue to incur significant operating
losses for the foreseeable future and may never become profitable.
As a result, the Company will likely need to raise additional
capital through one or more of the following: issuance of
additional debt or equity, or complete a licensing transaction for
one or more of the Company's pipeline assets.  Management believes
that it has sufficient working capital on hand to fund operations
through at least the next twelve months from the date these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were
available to be issued.  There can be no assurance that the Company
will be successful in acquiring additional funding, that the
Company's projections of its future working capital needs will
prove accurate, or that any additional funding would be sufficient
to continue operations in future years.

"We continue to expand and scale our unique precision genetic
medicine platform that we believe can turn genes on, off, or edit
them in vivo, and thus address most mechanisms that cause diseases
in a single industry-unifying solution," said Dietrich A. Stephan,
Ph.D., founder, CEO and Chairman of NeuBase.  "Our recent financing
led by top-tier healthcare investors enables us to advance our lead
program into the clinic next year and expand our pipeline to
address historically undruggable oncogenic driver mutations.  We
look forward to hosting our R&D day on June 8th, during which we
will present an update on our current pipeline programs, as well as
introduce an oncology program targeting a genetic driver mutation
in a high value indication."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1173281/000110465921066181/tm2114120d1_10q.htm

                    About NeuBase Therapeutics

NeuBase Therapeutics, Inc. -- http://www.neubasetherapeutics.com--
is a biotechnology company focused on developing next generation
therapies to treat rare genetic diseases and cancers caused by
mutant genes.  Given that perhaps every human disease has a genetic
component, the Company believes that its differentiated platform
technology has the potential for broad impact.

Neubase Therapeutics reported a net loss of $17.38 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $26.13 million
for the year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the
Company had $34.44 million in total assets, $3.15 million in total
liabilities, and $31.29 million in total stockholders' equity.


NN INC: Signs Cooperation Agreement With Corre, Adds New Director
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NN, Inc. entered into an agreement with Corre Partners Management,
LLC and certain related investors.

Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, the Company increased the
size of the Company's Board of Directors from nine to 10 directors
and appointed Dr. Rajeev Gautam to fill the newly created
directorship.  Dr. Gautam will serve as a director with an initial
term expiring at the Company's 2021 annual meeting and will be
included in the Company's slate of director nominees for election
at the 2021 and 2022 annual meeting.

As previously announced in December 2020, Steven T. Warshaw is not
standing for reelection and will resign as a member of the Board
effective as of immediately prior to the commencement of the 2021
annual meeting of stockholders of the Company.  Upon his
retirement, the size of the Board will be automatically reduced
from 10 members to 9 members.

The Cooperation Agreement requires Corre Partners to, at the
Company's 2021 annual meeting and at any meeting of the Company's
stockholders held prior to the date of termination of the
Standstill Period, vote all of its shares of the Company's common
stock in favor of the election of directors nominated by the Board
and otherwise in accordance with the Board's recommendation with
respect to all other matters, subject to certain exceptions for
extraordinary transactions, adoption of corporate defenses, and
matters with a contrary recommendation from either or both
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass Lewis & Co.,
LLC.

The Cooperation Agreement, among other things, contains certain
customary standstill restrictions that apply to Corre during the
period from May 13, 2021 until the date that is 20 calendar days
prior to the last day of the advance notice period for the
submission by shareholders of director nominations for the
Company's 2023 annual meeting, as set forth in the advance notice
provisions of the Company's Amended and Restated Bylaws.  During
the Standstill Period, Corre Partners is, among other things,
restricted from engaging in any solicitation of proxies or written
consents relating to the Company, acquiring any assets of the
Company, or acquiring any voting stock that would result in Corre
Partners having beneficial ownership of more than 15.0% of the
Company's outstanding common stock.

"Dr. Gautam's broad managerial and leadership experience within a
large public company will bring valuable guidance to NN, and we
welcome him to our Board," commented Jeri Harman, Chairman of NN's
Board of Directors.  "The knowledge he brings, including
commercialization of products across multiple applications, will
help shape NN's future direction.

Warren Veltman, NN president and chief executive officer, said,
"The extensive career of Dr. Gautam will offer unique insights for
our Mobile and Power Solutions businesses, as his technical
expertise in manufacturing, process technologies and performance
materials is sure to add operational and long-term strategic
value."

"The addition of Dr. Gautam as an independent director will add
experienced business leadership and valuable strategic expertise to
the Board as NN accelerates its commercial efforts to capitalize on
the significant secular growth opportunities in its end markets
today," said John Barrett, managing partner of Corre Partners.  "We
appreciate Jeri's leadership and NN's commitment to strengthening
its Board at this pivotal moment in its operating life cycle.  This
is a positive addition for all NN shareholders."

Dr. Gautam said, "I look forward to working with the Board and
management team to provide insights based on my experience that
will support continued shareholder value creation."

The NN Board is now comprised of 10 members, nine of whom are
independent.

                      About Dr. Rajeev Gautam

Dr. Gautam brings substantive experience as a senior executive to
manufacturing companies, and his current service as a senior
executive for a publicly traded company, enables him to bring
valuable insight, knowledge and experience to the Board.

Dr. Rajeev Gautam, 68, is the president and chief executive
officer, Performance Materials and Technologies of Honeywell
International, Inc. (NASDAQ: HON), a global provider in developing
and manufacturing high-quality performance chemicals and materials,
process technologies and automation solutions.  From 2009 to 2016,
Dr. Gautam served as president of Honeywell UOP.  He previously
served as vice president of Research and Development, Honeywell
UOP, and vice president and chief technology officer, Performance
Materials and Technologies.  Dr. Gautam began his career with Union
Carbide in 1978, which became part of a joint venture with
Honeywell UOP in 1988.  Throughout his career, Dr. Gautam has
championed innovative solutions for industry needs and has been
responsible for the development and commercialization of a broad
range of catalytic and separations applications for the refining,
petrochemical and gas processing industries.

                           About NN Inc.

NN, Inc. -- www.nninc.com -- is a global diversified industrial
company that combines advanced engineering and production
capabilities with in-depth materials science expertise to design
and manufacture high-precision components and assemblies primarily
for the electrical, automotive, general industrial, aerospace and
defense, and medical markets.  The Company has 32 facilities in
North America, Europe, South America, and China.

NN, Inc. reported a net loss of $100.59 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $46.74 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of March 31, 2021, the Company had
$622.32 million in total assets, $340.70 million in total
liabilities, $46.86 million in Series D perpetual preferred stock,
and $234.75 million in total stockholders' equity.


NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS: Signs Deal to Sell $4-Mil. Common Shares
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. entered into an At the Market
Offering Agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. to sell
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
having a current aggregate offering amount of up to $4,000,000,
which offering amount may change as described in the Agreement,
from time to time during the term of the Agreement, through an "at
the market" equity offering program under which Ladenburg will act
as the Company's sales agent.

Under the Agreement, the Company will set the parameters for the
sale of the Shares, including the maximum number of Shares to be
sold daily and any minimum price per Share at which such Shares may
be sold.  Subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement,
Ladenburg may sell the Shares by methods deemed to be an "at the
market offering" as defined in Rule 415 promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including, without limitation,
sales made through NYSE American LLC, on any other existing trading
market for the Common Stock or to or through a market maker.  In
addition, Ladenburg may also sell Shares in privately negotiated
transactions, provided Ladenburg receives prior written approval
from the Company.  In conducting such sales activities, Ladenburg
will use its commercially reasonable efforts consistent with its
normal trading and sales practices and applicable state and federal
laws, rules and regulations and the rules of NYSE American.  The
Company has no obligation to make any sales of Common Stock under
the Agreement.  The offering of Shares pursuant to the Agreement
will terminate on April 7, 2024 unless suspended or terminated
earlier by the Company upon prior notice to Ladenburg, by Ladenburg
upon prior notice to the Company, or otherwise by mutual agreement
of the parties.

The Company will pay Ladenburg a commission equal to three percent
of the gross sales proceeds of any Shares sold through Ladenburg
under the Agreement.  The Company has also provided Ladenburg with
customary indemnification rights.

Any sales of Shares under the Agreement will be made pursuant to
the Company's shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No.
333-254744) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
declared effective on April 7, 2021.  The Company filed a
prospectus supplement with the Commission on May 14, 2021 in
connection with the offer and sale of the Shares pursuant to the
Agreement.

In connection with the execution of the Agreement, the Company and
Ladenburg agreed to terminate their prior At the Market Offering
Agreement, dated April 27, 2020, pursuant to Section 8(c) of the
Prior Agreement, which termination became effective upon entering
into the Agreement on May 14, 2021.  Under this prior
"at-the-market" program, the Company sold 5,836,792 shares of
Common Stock, representing total net proceeds of approximately $5.6
million to the Company prior to termination.  As a result of
entering into the Agreement, the Prior ATM Program is no longer
available for use.

                           About Novabay

Headquartered in Emeryville, California, NovaBay Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. -- http://www.novabay.com-- is a biopharmaceutical company
focusing on commercializing and developing its non-antibiotic
anti-infective products to address the unmet therapeutic needs of
the global, topical anti-infective market with its two distinct
product categories: the NEUTROX family of products and the
AGANOCIDE compounds.  The Neutrox family of products includes
AVENOVA for the eye care market, CELLERX for the aesthetic
dermatology market, and NEUTROPHASE for wound care market.

Novabay reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$11.04 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $10.48 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$15.24 million in total assets, $2.92 million in total liabilities,
and $12.32 million in total stockholders' equity.


OMNIQ CORP: Posts $3.3 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------
OMNIQ Corp. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss attributable to
the company of $3.34 million on $19.75 million of total revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss
attributable to the company of $2.87 million on $13.80 million of
total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $38.21 million in total
assets, $45.55 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $7.34 million.

Shai Lustgarten, CEO of OMNIQ, "2021 is off to a great start.  Last
week we announced a definitive agreement to acquire Dangot, forming
a combined $91 Million revenue automation and object identification
solutions powerhouse, well placed to drive increased sales of our
AI based offerings."

"We also recorded a strong first quarter on an organic basis," said
Shai Lustgarten, CEO of OMNIQ.  "Revenue increased 43% to nearly
$20 million and AI based technology contracts grew 100% year over
year. As we add new AI based projects, book repeat supply chain
sales, in higher volumes, from our Fortune 500 customers, and
cross-sell AI-based solutions to our supply chain customers, and
now to Dangot customers, we expect rapid growth to continue."

Adjusted EBITDA (adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization) for the first quarter of 2020
amounted to a loss of $1.2 million compared with an adjusted EBITDA
loss of $834 thousand in the first quarter of 2020.

After fully paying off its $5.0 million credit line, cash was $2.7
million for the period ended March 31, 2021.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/278165/000149315221011334/form10-q.htm

                         About omniQ Corp.

Headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, omniQ Corp. (OTCQB: OMQS) --
http://www.omniq.com-- provides computerized and machine vision
image processing solutions that use patented and proprietary AI
technology to deliver data collection, real time surveillance and
monitoring for supply chain management, homeland security, public
safety, traffic & parking management and access control
applications.  The technology and services provided by the Company
help clients move people, assets and data safely and securely
through airports, warehouses, schools, national borders, and many
other applications and environments.

Omniq Corp. reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $11.31 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $5.31 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$38.66 million in total assets, $43.70 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $5.04 million.

Salt Lake City, Utah-based Haynie & Company, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated March 31, 2021, citing that the Company has a deficit in
stockholders' equity, and has sustained recurring losses from
operations.  This raises substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


OUTLOOK THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $13.1 Million Net Loss in 2nd Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------------
Outlook Therapeutics, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $13.11 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021,
compared to a net loss of $5.70 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2020.

For the six months ended March 31, 2021, the Company reported a net
loss of $27.56 million compared to a net loss of $22.30 million for
the six months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $45.11 million in total
assets, $24.46 million in total liabilities, and $20.65 million in
total stockholders' equity.

At March 31, 2021, Outlook Therapeutics had cash and cash
equivalents of $37.2 million, compared to $5.6 million at Dec. 31,
2020.  With the $42.6 million in gross proceeds received from the
public offerings and private placements of common stock in February
2021, plus an additional $3.6 million received from warrant
exercises also in February 2021, Outlook Therapeutics' cash and
cash equivalents on hand are sufficient to fund operations through
November 2021.

The Company has incurred substantial losses and negative cash flows
from operations since its inception.  As of March 31, 2021, the
Company had $10.5 million of principal and accrued interest due
under an unsecured promissory note maturing on Jan. 1, 2022, and a
$0.9 million loan granted pursuant to the Paycheck Protection
Program of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act,
which matures on May 2, 2022.  The Company said these factors raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1649989/000155837021007283/otlk-20210331x10q.htm

                     About Outlook Therapeutics

Outlook Therapeutics, Inc., formerly known as Oncobiologics, Inc.
-- http://www.outlooktherapeutics.com-- is a late clinical-stage
biopharmaceutical company working to develop the first FDA-approved
ophthalmic formulation of bevacizumab for use in retinal
indications, including wet AMD, DME and BRVO.  If ONS-5010, its
investigational ophthalmic formulation of bevacizumab, is approved,
Outlook Therapeutics expects to commercialize it as the first and
only on-label approved ophthalmic formulation of bevacizumab for
use in treating retinal diseases in the United States, Europe,
Japan and other markets.

Outlook Therapeutics reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $48.87 million for the year ended Sept. 30, 2020,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$36.04 million for the year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30,
2020, the Company had $19.73 million in total assets, $16.91
million in total liabilities, and $2.82 million in total
stockholders' equity.

KPMG LLP, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the Company's auditor
since 2015, issued a "going concern" qualification dated Dec. 23,
2020, citing that the Company has incurred recurring losses and
negative cash flows from operations since its inception and has an
accumulated deficit of $289.7 million as of Sept. 30, 2020 that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


PHUNWARE INC: Incurs $12.4 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Phunware, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $12.36
million on $1.65 million of net revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $3.96 million on $2.64
million of net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $54.93 million in total
assets, $38.37 million in total liabilities, and $16.56 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"The completion of Q1 constitutes a positive operational inflection
point for our business as we have quickly made our
Multiscreen-as-a-Service (MaaS) platform vision become reality
across a number of key fronts," said Alan S. Knitowski, president,
CEO and co-founder of Phunware.  "Not only have we commenced the
full roll out of our blockchain-enabled Mobile Loyalty Ecosystem
specific to PhunToken, PhunCoin and PhunWallet as promised, but we
have also executed a global distribution agreement with an anchor
distribution partner that will be formally announced in the next
several weeks.  While we continue to work through what appears to
be the final stages of the Covid pandemic operationally, we are
both excited and comforted by the dramatic increase in business
activity across all aspects of our software product and solution
offerings for mobile, big data and the cloud.  Importantly, these
encompass all three of our core growth engines rolling forward,
including our MaaS cloud, our data-driven loyalty marketplace and
our secure, blockchain-enabled token, coin and wallet
capabilities."

"We completed Q1 with $23.5 million of cash on hand, constituting a
record high for the Company since its inception," said Matt Aune,
CFO of Phunware.  "Subsequent to the completion of the quarter,
Phunware eliminated all of its previously outstanding 2020
convertible notes in full.  This action, combined with the
initiation of a $25 million At-The-Market offering against a $100
million shelf registration statement, have dramatically improved
the Company's balance sheet, operational flexibility and future
business needs for both organic and inorganic growth
opportunities."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1665300/000162828021010391/phun-20210331.htm

                          About Phunware

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Phunware, Inc. --
http://www.phunware.com-- is a Multiscreen-as-a-Service (MaaS)
company, a fully integrated enterprise cloud platform for mobile
that provides companies the products, solutions, data and services
necessary to engage, manage and monetize their mobile application
portfolios and audiences globally at scale.

Phunware reported a net loss of $22.20 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $12.87 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$31.84 million in total assets, $33.81 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.98 million.


PIAGGIO AMERICA: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21, until further notice, will not
appoint an official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter
11 case of Piaggio America, Inc., according to court dockets.
    
                       About Piaggio America

Piaggio America Inc. -- http://www.piaggioaerospace.it/-- is in
the business of aerospace product and parts manufacturing.  It
designs, develops and supports unmanned aerial systems, business,
special missions and ISR aircraft and aero engines.

Piaggio America filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Calif. Case No.
21-13491) on April 13, 2021.  Paolo Ferreri, chief executive
officer, signed the petition.  In the petition, the Debtor
disclosed $1 million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to
$50 million in liabilities.  

Judge Erik P. Kimball presides over the case.  

Holland & Knight, LLP and Sonoran Capital Advisors, LLC serve as
the Debtor's legal counsel and financial advisor, respectively.


PRECIPIO INC: Incurs $1.5 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------
Precipio, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $1.45
million on $1.82 million of net sales for the three months ended
March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $3.21 million on $1.22
million of net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $20.42 million in total
assets, $5.86 million in total liabilities, and $14.56 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Cash decreased by $0.4 million during the three months ended March
31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The cash flows used in operating activities of approximately $1.3
million during the three months ended March 31, 2021 included a net
loss of $1.4 million, an increase in inventories and other assets
of $0.3 million, an increase in finance lease right of use assets
of less than $0.1 million, a decrease in accrued expenses and other
liabilities of $0.2 million and a decrease in operating lease
liabilities of $0.1 million.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $0.2 million and less
than $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and
2020, respectively, resulting from purchases of property and
equipment.

Cash flows provided by financing activities totaled $1.1 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2021, which included proceeds
of $1.3 million from the issuance of common stock.

The Company has incurred substantial operating losses and has used
cash in its operating activities for the past several years.  As of
March 31, 2021, the Company had negative working capital of $0.3
million and net cash used in operating activities of $1.3 million.
The Company's ability to continue as a going concern over the next
twelve months from the date of issuance of these condensed
consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q is dependent upon a combination of achieving its business
plan, including generating additional revenue and avoiding
potential business disruption due to the novel coronavirus
pandemic, and raising additional financing to meet its debt
obligations and paying liabilities arising from normal business
operations when they come due.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1043961/000155837021007252/prpo-20210331x10q.htm

                          About Precipio

Omaha, Nebraska-based Precipio, formerly known as Transgenomic,
Inc. -- http://www.precipiodx.com-- is a cancer diagnostics
company providing diagnostic products and services to the oncology
market. The Company has developed a platform designed to eradicate
misdiagnoses by harnessing the intellect, expertise and technology
developed within academic institutions and delivering quality
diagnostic information to physicians and their patients worldwide.
Precipio operates a cancer diagnostic laboratory located in New
Haven, Connecticut and has partnered with the Yale School of
Medicine.

Precipio reported a net loss of $10.6 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $13.24 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$20.71 million in total assets, $6.55 million in total liabilities,
and $14.16 million in total stockholders' equity.

Hartford, CT-based Marcum LLP issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated March 29, 2021, citing that the
Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred
significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


QUALITY REIMBURSEMENT: Plan Confirmed, Bid for Ch.11 Trustee Nixed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Julia W. Brand denied the motion of Alvaro Gancman and
Eastpoint Corporation to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee or,
alternatively, to appoint an Examiner in the Chapter 11 case of
Quality Reimbursement Services, Inc.

The Court denied the request after having been advised by the
Debtor that a settlement has been reached to resolve the issues
raised by the motion, and after having considered the oppositions
raised by the Debtor, the Committee, a group of consultants
represented by Lesnick Prince and Pappas, LLP, and Consultant Brian
Peterson.

In a separate order on May 18, 2021, the Court entered an order
confirming the Debtor's Third Amended Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization, as Further Modified.

               About Quality Reimbursement Services

Quality Reimbursement Services, Inc. --
http://www.qualityreimbursement.com/-- has been reviewing Medicare
and Medicaid cost reports for more than 12 years.  Its corporate
office is located in Arcadia (CA). The company also has offices
located in Birmingham, Ala.; Scottsdale, Ariz.; Los Angeles,
Calif.; Colorado Springs, Colo.; Jacksonville, Fla.; Chicago, Ill.;
Detroit and Shelby Township, Mich.; Guttenberg, N.J.; Dallas/Fort
Worth, Texas; and Spokane, Wash.

Quality Reimbursement Services filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 19-20918) on Sept. 13, 2019.  In the petition signed by
James C. Ravindran, president, and CEO, the Debtor was estimated to
have $1 million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to $50
million in liabilities.

Judge Julia W. Brand oversees the case. Garrick A. Hollander, Esq.,
at Winthrop Couchot Golubow Hollander, LLP, represents the Debtor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtor's case on Oct. 22, 2019.  The committee
retained Buchalter, a Professional Corporation, as its legal
counsel.

On August 18, 2020, the Court approved the Debtor's disclosure
statement and scheduled the hearing on plan confirmation for
November 20, 2020.  The Debtor's plan of reorganization pays
creditors in full.




RISING TIDE: Moody's Assigns First Time 'B3' Corp. Family Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to Rising
Tide Holdings, Inc. (initially Marine One Merger Sub, Inc. "Rising
Tide") including a B3 corporate family rating and a B3-PD
probability of default rating. In addition, Moody's assigned a B2
rating to Rising Tide's proposed $385 million first lien term loan
and a Caa2 rating to the proposed $120 million second lien term
loan. The outlook is stable. The proceeds will be used to complete
the acquisition of Rising Tide by L Catterton. Moody's ratings and
outlook are subject to receipt and review of final documentation.

The B3 CFR assignment reflects Rising Tide's high pro forma
leverage post-transaction with funded debt/EBITDA of approximately
8.2x and Moody's lease adjusted debt/EBITDA of 6.7x for the LTM
period April 3, 2021. However, leverage is expected to improve in
2021 from EBITDA growth. Record boat sales in 2020 should continue
to provide tailwinds for Rising Tide over the near term as boat
purchases are usually followed by an increased spend on boating
aftermarket products. The rating incorporates governance
considerations given the company's private equity ownership.
Private equity owners tend to have more aggressive financial
strategies.

Assignments:

Issuer: Rising Tide Holdings, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term Loan, Assigned Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Rising Tide Holdings, Inc.

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Rising Tide's B3 CFR reflects its high leverage and small scale
compared to other rated retailers. The company operates in the
marine aftermarket industry which is highly fragmented and very
competitive. Rising Tide's business shows some cyclicality with the
discretionary nature of boating and marine aftermarket products.
However, performance through downturns has proven to be much more
resilient than actual boat sales as these products have shorter
replacement lives.

The B3 CFR is supported by Rising Tide's brand awareness as well as
its strong position in the marine aftermarket industry. The rating
is also supported by Rising Tide's solid interest coverage with no
near term debt maturities. The B3 CFR reflects that Rising Tide's
funded leverage is expected to improve over the near term from
favorable industry tailwinds. An increased interest in boating,
which accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic as it is conducive
to social distancing, is expected to drive EBITDA growth over the
next twelve to eighteen months. EBITDA is also expected to benefit
from recent management initiatives. Over the past few years
management has implemented initiatives to expand margins including
optimized promotional activity and product assortment initiatives
which focused on the core customer. The company has also been able
to better leverage its selling, general and administrative costs
with labor optimization and growth in online sales which has also
been a main point of focus. The business has low capital investment
requirements which benefit free cash flow generation.

The stable outlook reflects the expectation that the recent margin
enhancement will be sustained and deleveraging will occur through
earnings growth while maintaining adequate liquidity. The stable
outlook also reflects Moody's expectations of no material dividend
distributions.

Rising Tide has adequate liquidity reflecting Moody's expectation
of low cash balances and positive free cash flow generation. The
company will have access to an undrawn $125 million asset-based
lending revolving credit facility. Moody's expects the revolver to
be used for seasonal working capital needs as the company builds
working capital and the fourth and first quarters in preparation of
the spring and summer seasons.

As proposed, the new first and second lien credit facilities are
expected to provide covenant flexibility that if utilized could
negatively impact creditors. Notable terms include the following:

Incremental debt capacity up to the greater of $75 million and
100% of Consolidated EBITDA plus unlimited amounts subject to a net
first lien leverage ratio of 4.1x (for pari passu first lien debt)
and a secured net leverage ratio that does not exceed 0.25x outside
the closing date secured leverage ratio (for debt pari passu with
the 2nd lien). Amounts up to the greater of $75 million and 100% of
Consolidated EBITDA may be incurred with a shorter weighted average
life to maturity date than the initial term loans.

The credit facilities contain provisions allowing the transfer of
assets to unrestricted subsidiaries subject to a blocker provision
which prohibits the transfer of material intellectual property to
any unrestricted subsidiary.

Non-wholly-owned subsidiaries are not required to provide
guarantees; dividends or transfers resulting in partial ownership
of subsidiary guarantors could jeopardize guarantees subject to
protective provisions which only permit guarantee releases if such
transfer is done for bona-fide business purposes and not for the
primary purpose of effecting a release from such guarantee to evade
creditors.

The credit agreement provides some limitations on up-tiering
transactions, including the requirement that each lender consents
to amendments to subordinate the indebtedness or lien securing the
first lien credit facilities.

The proposed terms and the final terms of the credit agreement may
be materially different.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if the company displays a commitment
to maintaining conservative financial policies and credit metrics.
Specifically, a higher rating would require good liquidity,
debt/EBITDA sustained below 5.25x and EBIT/interest expense
sustained above 1.75x.

The ratings could be downgraded if there is a deterioration of the
company's overall operating performance, liquidity profile or
sustained free cash flow deficits. Quantitatively, the ratings
could be downgraded if EBIT/interest expense drops below 1.25x.

Rising Tide Holdings, Inc. is a specialty marine aftermarket
retailer that operates 237 hub and service center locations across
38 states and Puerto Rico as well as an ecommerce website as of
April 2021. Rising Tide is controlled by investment funds
affiliated with L Catterton following a leveraged buyout in May
2021. Net revenues for the LTM period ending April 3, 2021 were
approximately $740 million.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.


RITE AID: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'Caa1' CFR to Positive
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed the outlook for Rite Aid
Corporation to positive from stable. All other ratings including
the company's Caa1 corporate family rating and its Caa1-PD
probability of default rating are affirmed. Additionally, Moody's
upgraded the company's speculative grade liquidity rating to SGL-2
from SGL-3.

"Rite Aid's liquidity has improved and near term maturities have
been addressed but operational and competitive challenges remain,"
Moody's Vice President Mickey Chadha stated. "The change in outlook
to positive reflects our expectations for further improvement in
credit metrics and free cash flow over the next 12 months. New
management initiatives are showing traction but will take time to
fully demonstrate upside," Chadha further stated.

Upgrades:

Issuer: Rite Aid Corporation

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3

Affirmations:

Issuer: Rite Aid Corporation

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Caa1-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Caa1

Senior Secured ABL Revolving Credit Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Caa1 (LGD4)

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Caa1 (LGD4)

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Caa3 (LGD6)

GTD Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Rite Aid Corporation

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Rite Aid's Caa1 rating incorporates it's weak credit metrics and
smaller scale compared to much larger and well capitalized
competitors like CVS Health and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
Scale has become increasingly more important in today's competitive
pharmacy sector. The company's recent fourth quarter results were
weaker than expected primarily due to the very weak flu and cold
season. However, Moody's anticipates that as restrictions and
lockdowns are eased in 2021 the flu and cold season will somewhat
normalize supporting an improvement in Rite Aid's earnings. Moody's
also expects the COVID-19 vaccine roll out will be a tail wind for
Rite Aid due to the increased traffic it generates and there is a
high probability that the vaccine will be needed on an ongoing
basis quite like the flu vaccine is today. Moody's expects Rite
Aid's lease adjusted debt/EBITDA to be below 6.0x for the fiscal
year ended March 2022 but interest coverage will remain weak at
around 1.0x. Positive ratings consideration is given to Moody's
expectation that management will continue focus on cost reduction,
inventory rationalization, store remodels, growth in the Elixir PBM
business, increase the level of script growth through increased
traffic and file buys and strategically target participation in
limited and preferred networks to boost revenue, earnings and free
cash flow. Rite Aid's good liquidity, and the relative stability
and positive longer term trends of the prescription drug industry
are other positive rating considerations.

Rite-Aid's rating also takes into consideration the litigation risk
associated with prescription drug usage especially opioids. Rite
Aid's financial strategies have remained balanced with the company
using cash received from asset sales to repay debt.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that management
initiatives including expense rationalization will improve
operating performance and credit metrics in the next 12 months.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be upgraded if the company demonstrates a sustained
improvement in operating performance. An upgrade would require
continued script volume growth and positive comparable front end
sales. Ratings could be upgraded if the company demonstrates that
it can maintain debt/EBITDA below 6.5 times and EBIT to interest
expense above 1.0 times. In addition, a higher rating would require
Rite Aid to continue to maintain at least an adequate liquidity
profile, including positive free cash flow.

Ratings could be downgraded should the likelihood of a default
increase for any reason or if Rite Aid experiences a decline in
revenues or earnings or increases debt such that debt/EBITDA is
likely to remain above 7.0 times and EBIT to interest expense is
likely to remain below 1.0 times. Ratings could also be downgraded
should liquidity weaken including free cash flow remaining negative
or the company does not get any traction on new PBM contracts or if
prescription volumes decline.

Rite Aid Corporation operates 2,464 drug stores in 18 states. It
also operates a full-service pharmacy benefit management company
(Elixir). Revenues are about $22 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.


ROCKET SOFTWARE: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR Following ASG Acquisition
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Rocket Software, Inc.'s B3
Corporate Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating.
Concurrently, Moody's affirmed the B2 rating on Rocket's first lien
bank credit facilities and Caa2 rating on its senior unsecured
bonds. The affirmations follow Rocket's announcement that it has
entered an agreement to acquire ASG Technologies Group, Inc. The
acquisition will be funded with an $825 million incremental first
lien term loan as well as some balance sheet cash. The outlook
remains stable.

ASG is a provider of enterprise content management, systems
management and data intelligence enterprise software products and
services. ASG's solutions, like Rocket's, are oriented toward users
of IBM mainframe and hybrid mainframe-distributed IT environments.
The acquisition of ASG by Rocket is expected to provide Rocket with
a suite of complementary mainframe focused products as well as
significant cost cutting opportunities within both G&A and
development functions.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Rocket Software, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Caa2 (LGD6) from
(LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Rocket Software, Inc.

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Rocket's B3 CFR reflects the company's smaller scale relative to
its infrastructure software peers, and its highly acquisitive
growth strategy which can lead to periodic increases in debt.
Rocket has somewhat limited organic growth prospects and looks to
strategic acquisitions to augment growth and improve its market
positioning. Rocket has historically used a combination of
internally generated cash flow and debt to fund its acquisitions.
The use of additional debt to fund further large acquisition
activity could result in leverage levels remaining elevated over
time. As evidenced by the high level of leverage used to finance
the 2018 LBO of the company by private equity sponsors Bain Capital
and additional debt incurred for acquisitions since the LBO,
Moody's expects rocket to maintain an aggressive financial
strategy.

Rockets ratings are supported by the company's strong profitability
with historical EBITDA margins of around 50%, strong free cash flow
generation, long-standing supply relationship with IBM and
relatively high proportion of recurring revenues. Rocket is
expected to generate low single digit organic revenue growth over
the next 12-18 months but Moody's expects that acquisition activity
will continue to be a key driver of revenue and EBITDA growth.

Moody's adjusted leverage is very high at over 8x as of December
2021 however when adjusting for certain one-time expenses and
expected cost savings, leverage could be viewed at around 7.5x.
Rocket's organic growth is expected to improve in 2021 compared to
recent years and the realization of cost reductions throughout 2021
will help to bolster free cash flow generation which Moody's
expects will approximate 4-5% of gross debt over the next 12-18
months.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations for continued low
single digit organic revenue growth, consistent free cash flow
generation in the mid-single digit percent of gross debt and
expectations that the company will realize anticipated cost
synergies, driving adjusted leverage toward 7x over the next 12-18
months.

Liquidity is good based on an expected cash balance of $51 million
at the close of the transaction and Moody's expectation for free
cash flow to debt in the 4-5% range over the next 12-18 months.
Liquidity is also supported by an undrawn $150 million revolving
credit facility.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be upgraded if operating performance were to improve
such that Moody's adjusted leverage were sustained below 6.5x and
free cash flow to gross debt were maintained at 5% or above.

Ratings could be downgraded if leverage is expected to be sustained
above 7.5x or free cash flow generation was negative on other than
a temporary basis. Moreover, the ratings could be downgraded if
Rocket were to lose a critical business partner or face a material
deterioration in recurring revenues or liquidity.

Rocket Software, Inc. is a provider of IT management software tools
to the distributed and IBM mainframe markets. Pro forma for the
acquisition of ASG, the company is expected to generate
approximately $711 million of revenues for the year ended December
31, 2020. Rocket, which is headquartered in Waltham, MA, is owned
by management and funds affiliated with private equity sponsor Bain
Capital.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Software
Industry published in August 2018.


ROLLING HILLS: Wins Cash Collateral Access
------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri,
Eastern Division, has authorized Rolling Hills Apartments, LLC to
use cash collateral on an interim basis to pay the operating
expenses of its business in accordance with the budget.

The Debtor is directed to pay LBCI REO, LLC $5,000 by the first of
each month beginning June 1, 2021 as adequate protection for the
use of LBCI's cash collateral.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owes LBCI $2,582,173, plus
attorney's fees and costs.  The debt is secured by valid,
perfected, enforceable, first priority liens and security interests
in the Debtor's real property in Maya Lane, St. Louis, Missouri.

The liens and security interest extends to the rent income
generated by the property.

A final hearing on the Motion is scheduled for July 12 at 11 a.m.

A copy of the order and the Debtor's budget is available free of
charge at https://bit.ly/3olch2K from PacerMonitor.com.

The Debtor projects $5,000 in monthly cost of debt service.

              About Rolling Hills Apartments, LLC

Rolling Hills Apartments is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)). Rolling Hills sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
E.D. Mo. Case No. 21-41314) on April 9, 2021.

In the petition signed by Robert Keith Bennett, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $3,486,865 in assets and $3,752,509 in liabilities.

Judge Kathy A. Surratt-States oversees the case.

Carmody MacDonald, P.C. is the Debtor's counsel.



ROYALE ENERGY: Incurs $572K Net Loss in First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------
Royale Energy, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $572,167 on $401,263 of total revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2021, compared to net income of $384,362 on
$383,814 of total revenues for the three months ended March 31,
2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $8.02 million in total
assets, $14.62 million in total liabilities, $22.41 million in
convertible preferred stock, and a total stockholders' deficit of
$29.01 million.

The Company said the primary sources of liquidity have historically
been issuances of common stock, oil and gas sales through ongoing
operations and the sale of oil and gas properties.  There are
factors that give rise to substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to meet liquidity demands, and it anticipates that its
primary sources of liquidity will be from the issuance of debt
and/or equity, the sale of oil and natural gas property
participation interests through its normal course of business and
the sale of non-strategic assets.  At March 31, 2021, the Company
has $1.529 million in Long Lived Assets Held for Sale.

At March 31, 2021, the Company's consolidated financial statements
reflect a working capital deficiency of $4,337,733 and a net loss
from operations of $581,393.  These factors raise substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern.  The accompanying
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a
going concern.

The Company said, "Management's plans to alleviate the going
concern by cost control measures that include the reduction of
overhead costs and the sale of non-strategic assets.  There is no
assurance that additional financing will be available when needed
or that management will be able to obtain financing on terms
acceptable to the Company and whether the Company will become
profitable and generate positive operating cash flow.  If the
Company is unable to raise sufficient additional funds, it will
have to develop and implement a plan to further extend payables,
attempt to extend note repayments, and reduce overhead until
sufficient additional capital is raised to support further
operations.  There can be no assurance that such a plan will be
successful."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1694617/000118518521000654/royaleinc20210331_10q.htm

                            About Royale

El Cajon, CA-based Royale Energy, Inc. -- http://www.royl.com-- is
an independent oil and natural gas producer incorporated under the
laws of Delaware.  Royale's principal lines of business are the
production and sale of oil and natural gas, acquisition of oil and
gas lease interests and proved reserves, drilling of both
exploratory and development wells, and sales of fractional working
interests in wells to be drilled by Royale.  Royale was
incorporated in Delaware in 2017 and is the successor by merger to
Royale Energy Funds, Inc., a California corporation formed in
1983.

Royale Energy reported a net loss of $8.15 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $348,383 for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$8.42 million in total assets, $14.57 million in total liabilities,
$22.22 million in convertible preferred stock, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $28.36 million.


SAFE FLEET: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Stable
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed the ratings outlook for Safe
Fleet Holdings LLC to stable from negative. At the same time,
Moody's affirmed the company's B3 corporate family rating and B3-PD
probability of default rating, along with the B2 rating on the
first lien senior secured credit facilities rating and the Caa2
rating on the senior secured second lien term loan.

"Safe Fleet's demand prospects are stronger in 2021 with returning
spending levels in many of the company's markets", says Shirley
Singh, Moody's lead analyst for the company.

"In addition, the ramp up of the California Highway Patrol contract
and integration of the Durite acquisition will further strengthen
earnings and improve credit metrics", adds Singh. Moody's estimates
that leverage will fall below 7.4x and the company will maintain
good liquidity supported by strong free cash flow in 2021.

The following rating actions were taken:

Affirmations:

Issuer: Safe Fleet Holdings LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

Senior Secured 1st Lien Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd lien Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Caa2
(LGD6)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Safe Fleet Holdings LLC

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Safe Fleet's B3 CFR reflects the company's high leverage with
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA in excess of 7.5x (as of December 2020).
With revenues of less than $500 million, the company's scale is
relatively modest. Further, the company has a history of
debt-financed acquisitions.

The rating is supported by Safe Fleet's consistently positive cash
flow driven by solid EBITA margins and low capital requirements.
Safe Fleet maintains a competitive position within its niche
markets with a broad set of customizable products for fleet
vehicles in both aftermarket and OEM channels.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation for good
liquidity and EBITDA growth over the course of 2021, resulting in
modest deleveraging.

Safe Fleet's liquidity is good. Liquidity sources include $31
million of cash and full availability under its $50 million
revolving credit facility. Moody's expects the company to generate
above $30 million of free cash flow in 2021.

Environmental and social risks are not material to the credit
profile. Governance risk is high given the company's private equity
ownership and history of debt-financed acquisitions.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be downgraded if deterioration in market conditions,
loss of a customer or competitive pressure weakens earnings or cash
flow. Quantitatively, adjusted debt-to-EBITDA sustained above 7.5x
or weakened liquidity could prompt a rating downgrade.

Ratings could be upgraded if the company's scale increases and
profit margins are maintained such that adjusted debt-to-EBITDA is
sustained below 6.5x and free cash flow to debt increases to the
high single-digit percent range.

Headquartered in Belton, Missouri, Safe Fleet Holdings LLC
manufactures safety and productivity products for fleet vehicles
including school and transit buses, fire EMS and law enforcement
vehicles, work trucks, truck & trailers used in various industries
and military vehicles. Among Safe Fleet's products are cameras and
surveillance systems, ladder racks, ramps and platforms, nozzles
and valves, and stop signs and crossing arms for school buses. The
company is majority-owned by Oak Hill Capital Partners. Sales in
the last twelve months to March 31, 2021 were $435 million.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Manufacturing
Methodology published in March 2020.


SC SJ HOLDINGS: Fairmont San Jose's Bankruptcy Plan on Ice
----------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill of Bloomberg Law reports that the bankrupt Fairmont San
Jose must wait to send its reorganization plan to creditors for a
vote after a judge said the company's disclosures lack information
about who would take over management of the luxury hotel.

Identification of the new hotel managers is a "central issue" to
the plan "for obvious reasons," Judge John T. Dorsey of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware said at a virtual
hearing Monday, May 17, 2021.

The plan disclosures also need the basic terms of proposed
post-bankruptcy financing, Robert J. Gayda of Seward & Kissel LLP,
an attorney for the unsecured creditors committee.

                 About SC SJ Holdings and FMT SJ

San Ramon, Caliofrnia-based Eagle Canyon Management's SC SJ
Holdings LLC owns The Fairmont San Jose, an 805-room luxury hotel
located at 170 South Market St., San Jose, Calif. The hotel is near
many of the largest Fortune 1000 corporations and is a popular
location for conferences and conventions, particularly in the
technology industry.

On March 5, 2021, SC SJ Holdings' affiliate, FMT SJ LLC, filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 21-10521).  On March 10, 2021, SC SJ
Holdings sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
21-10549).  The cases are jointly administered under Case No.
21-10549.

At the time of the filing, SC SJ Holdings disclosed assets of
between $100 million and $500 million and liabilities of the same
range.  FMT SJ disclosed that it had estimated assets of between
$500,000 and $1 million and liabilities of between $100 million
and
$500 million.

The Debtors tapped Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, as their
bankruptcy counsel, Cole Schotz P.C. as local counsel, and Verity
LLC as financial advisor. Stretto is the claims agent and
administrative advisor.


SEADRILL LTD: Forbearance Agreement Extended to May 28, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------
On May 17, 2021, Seadrill Limited (OSE:SDRL, OTCQX:SDRLF) announces
that Seadrill New Finance Limited (the "Issuer"), a subsidiary of
the Company, has agreed to extend the existing forbearance
agreement announced on 19 April 2021, with respect to the 12.0%
senior secured notes due 2025 (the "Notes") with certain holders of
the Notes (the "Note Holders").

Pursuant to the forbearance agreement, as extended, the consenting
Note Holders have agreed not to exercise any enforcement rights
with respect to the Issuer and any subsidiary of the Issuer which
is an obligor under the Notes to, or otherwise take actions in
respect of, certain events of default that may arise under the
Notes as a result of, amongst other things, the Issuer not making
the semi-annual 4% cash interest payment due to the senior secured
noteholders on 15 January 2021 in respect of their Notes and the
filing of Chapter 11 cases in the Southern District of Texas by the
Company and certain of its consolidated subsidiaries (excluding the
Issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries) until and including the
earlier of 28 May 2021 and any termination of the forbearance
agreement.

The purpose of the forbearance agreement is to allow the Issuer and
its stakeholders more time to negotiate on the heads of terms of a
comprehensive restructuring of its balance sheet. Such a
restructuring may involve the use of a court-supervised process.

                     About Seadrill Ltd.

Seadrill Limited (OSE:SDRL, OTCQX:SDRLF) --
http://www.seapdrill.com/-- is a deepwater drilling contractor
providing drilling services to the oil and gas industry. As of
March 31, 2018, it had a fleet of over 35 offshore drilling units
that include 12 semi-submersible rigs, 7 drillships, and 16 jack-up
rigs.

On Sept. 12, 2017, Seadrill Limited sought Chapter 11 protection
after reaching terms of a reorganization plan that would
restructure $8 billion of funded debt. It emerged from bankruptcy
in July 2018.

Demand for exploration and drilling has fallen further during the
COVID-19 pandemic as oil firms seek to preserve cash, idling more
rigs and leading to additional overcapacity among companies serving
the industry.

In June 2020, Seadrill wrote down the value of its rigs by $1.2
billion and said it planned to scrap 10 rigs. Seadrill said it is
in talks with lenders on a restructuring of its $5.7 billion bank
debt.

Seadrill Partners LLC, a limited liability company formed by
deep-water drilling contractor Seadrill Ltd. to own, operate and
acquire offshore drilling rigs, along with its affiliates, sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-35740) on
Dec. 1, 2020, after its parent company swept one of its bank
accounts to pay disputed management fees.  Mohsin Y. Meghji,
authorized signatory, signed the petitions.

On Feb. 7, 2021, Seadrill GCC Operations Ltd., Asia Offshore
Drilling Limited, Asia Offshore Rig 1 Limited, Asia Offshore Rig 2
Limited, and Asia Offshore Rig 3 Limited sought Chapter 11
protection. Seadrill GCC estimated $100 million to $500 million in
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

Additionally, on Feb. 10, 2021, Seadrill Limited and 114 affiliated
debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the United States Bankruptcy Code with the Court. The lead case
is In re Seadrill Limited (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 21-30427).

Seadrill Limited disclosed $7.291 billion in assets against $7.193
billion in liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

In the new Chapter 11 cases, Kirkland & Ellis LLP is counsel for
the Debtors. Houlihan Lokey, Inc., is the financial advisor.
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, is the restructuring advisor.

The law firm of Jackson Walker L.L.P. is co-bankruptcy counsel. The
law firm of Slaughter and May is co-corporate counsel.
Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS is serving as Norwegian counsel.
Conyers Dill & Pearman is serving as Bermuda counsel. Prime Clerk
LLC is the claims agent.

Scott Greissman, Jason Zakia and Phil Abelson of White & Case; and
Jason Brookner of Gray Reed represent the coordinating committee of
secured lenders. Eric Winston, Benjamin Finestone and Devin van der
Hahn of Quinn Emanuel represent Strategic Value Partners Bybrook
Capital. Alfredo Perez, Matt Barr, Sunny Singh, David Cohen and
Paul Genender of Weil Gotshal & Manges represent the RigCo
lenders.



SEADRILL PARNTERS: Court Approves Debt-for-Equity Plan
------------------------------------------------------
Judge David R. Jones, on May 14, 2021, confirmed the Fourth Amended
Joint Chapter 11 Plan and approved the accompanying Disclosure
Statement filed in the Chapter 11 cases of Seadrill Partners LLC
and its debtor-affiliates.

The Plan, which is the product of good faith, arm's-length
negotiations by and among the Debtors, the Debtors' directors and
officers, the Consenting TLB Lenders, the Agent, the Committee, and
each member of the Committee, provides, among others, that:

   * the Reorganized Debtors will continue to pay all retiree
benefits on and after the Effective Date pursuant to applicable
law.

   * on the Effective Date, all property in each Estate, all of the
Debtors' causes of action, and any property acquired by any of the
Debtors pursuant to the Plan shall vest in each respective
Reorganized Debtor, free and clear of all liens, claims, charges,
or other encumbrances.

   * on and after the Effective Date, each Reorganized Debtor may
operate its businesses and may use, acquire, or dispose of property
and compromise or settle any Claims, interests, or causes of action
without supervision or approval by the Court and free of any
restrictions of the Bankruptcy Code or Bankruptcy Rules.

   * Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. and Transocean
Inc. shall be deemed to have opted out of the releases contained in
Article VIII.C of the Plan.  Nothing in the Plan releases or
otherwise restricts any rights, causes of action, remedies and
interests of any of the Transocean Entities against any of the
Seadrill Parties in respect of (i) the Settlement and Cross-License
Agreement dated December 21, 2018 among, Transocean, Seadrill
Partners LLC and Seadrill Limited or any breach thereof, (ii) any
of Transocean's patents or any infringement thereof, or (iii)
applicable law; and/or (b) any Reorganized Debtor for any
post-Effective Date infringement of Transocean's patents.

   * Transocean is allowed an Administrative Claim for the unpaid
December 31, 2020 SDLP payment under the Patent Settlement for
$2,000,000, and an Allowed General Unsecured Claim (as a result of
SDLP's rejection under the Plan of the Patent Settlement) for
$6,000,000.

   * the rights of the Debtors and Sodexo and/or its affiliates
with respect to (i) Sodexo's cure claims and requests for
administrative expense claims for post-petition goods and services
provided by Sodexo to the Debtors, and  (ii) Sodexo's right of
setoff, as set forth in Sodexo's proofs of claim, are preserved and
shall not be prejudiced by the entry of the Confirmation Order or
the Plan confirmation.

   * the Debtors and Gulf Copper & Manufacturing Corporation shall
reconcile any amounts due and owing under the Berthing Agreement in
the ordinary course pursuant to the terms of the Berthing
Agreement, with each party's rights being fully preserved.

   * each of the Debtors will, as a Reorganized Debtor, continue to
exist after the Effective Date as a separate legal entity, with all
of the powers of such legal entity under applicable law and without
prejudice to any right to alter or terminate such existence whether
by merger, conversion, dissolution or otherwise.

   * as of the Effective Date, the officers and directors of each
of New HoldCo and the other Reorganized Debtors shall be appointed
and/or shall continue in such role.

   * on or as soon as reasonably practicable after the Effective
Date, the Debtors shall adopt the Employee Incentive Plan.  The
Employee Incentive Plan shall reserve a portion of the New Common
Stock, in an amount to be determined by the New HoldCo Board, for
grants made from time to time to employees, directors, officers,
and consultants of the Reorganized Debtors, solely as determined by
the New HoldCo Board.

   * on the Effective Date, the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors
are authorized to issue the New Common Stock to the Holders of
Claims in Classes 3 or 4 pursuant to Article III of the Plan.  The
offering, issuance, and distribution of the New Common Stock
according to the Plan shall be exempt from the registration
requirements of Section 5 of the Securities Act and any other
applicable United States state or local laws.

A copy of the Plan Confirmation Order is available for free at
https://bit.ly/3fDmjZp from Prime Clerk, claims agent.

The Court authorized the Debtors and the Reorganized Debtors to
make all distributions pursuant to the Plan.  The Plan provides for
the treatment of the Classes of Claims, as follows:

   * Class 1 - All Other Secured Claims against the Debtors

Each Holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claim shall receive (as
determined by the Debtors or the Reorganized Debtors, with the
consent of the Required Consenting Lenders) (i) payment in full in
Cash of its Allowed Other Secured Claim; (ii) the collateral
securing its Allowed Other Secured Claim; (iii) Reinstatement of
its Allowed Other Secured Claim; or (iv) other treatment rendering
its Allowed Other Secured Claim Unimpaired pursuant to Section 1124
of the Bankruptcy Code.

   * Class 2 - Other Priority Claims

Each Holder of an Allowed Other Priority Claim shall receive Cash
in an amount equal to such Allowed Other Priority Claim, or such
other treatment as may be agreed among the Holder of such Other
Priority Claim, the Debtors, and the Required Consenting Lenders.


   * Class 3 - Super Senior Term Loan Claims

On the Effective Date, each Holder of an Allowed Class 3 Claim
shall receive its Pro Rata share of 31.8% of the New Common Stock,
subject to dilution by any future issuances of New Common Stock.

   * Class 4 - TLB Secured Claims

On the Effective Date, each Holder of an Allowed Class 4 Claim
shall receive its Pro Rata share of 68.2% of the New Common Stock
(subject to dilution by any future issuances of New Common Stock),
unless such Holder elects to receive the Cash Out Amount per $1,000
of Allowed Class 4 Claims in Cash, subject to the Cash Cap.

If the total Class 4 Cash Elections would result in distributions
of Cash to Holders of Allowed Class 4 Claims in excess of the Cash
Cap, then each Holder of an Allowed Class 4 Claim that elected to
receive Cash shall receive its Pro Rata share of: (i) the Cash Cap
amount in Cash and (ii) New Common Stock of the value equal to the
balance of the recovery such Holder would have received in the
absence of the Cash Cap.

Any TLB Deficiency Claim shall be classified as a Class 5 General
Unsecured Claim; provided, however, that if (i) Class 4 votes to
accept the Plan and (ii) Class 5 votes to accept the Plan, the TLB
Deficiency Claims shall not be entitled to any distribution under
the Plan and shall be deemed canceled.  

   * Class 5 - General Unsecured Claims.  Holders of Allowed Claims
in Class 5 will share pro-rata of $2,250,000.  No Seadrill Party,
however, is entitled to any distribution for any Seadrill Parties
Unsecured Claim.

A copy of the 4th Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan is available for
free at https://bit.ly/3w9mOkm from Prime Clerk, claims agent.

                     About Seadrill Partners

Seadrill Partners LLC (NYSE: SDLP) is a limited liability company
formed by deep-water drilling contractor Seadrill
Ltd.(OTCMKTS:SDRLF) to own, operate and acquire offshore drilling
rigs.  It was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in London, the
United Kingdom. Seadrill Partners, set up as an asset-holding unit,
owns four drillships, four semi-submersible rigs and three
so-called tender rigs which are all operated by Seadrill Ltd.

Seadrill Partners and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-35740) on Dec. 1, 2020. Mohsin
Y. Meghji, managing partner at M3 Partners, acting as the Company's
Chief Restructuring Officer, signed the petitions.

Judge Marvin Isgur oversees the cases.

Seadrill Partners disclosed $4,579,300,000 in assets and
$3,122,300,000 in total debts as of June 30, 2020.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis International LLP, and
Jackson Walker LLP are the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel. The Debtors
also tapped Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP to serve as
conflicts counsel and KPMG LLP to provide tax provision and
consulting services.


SHRI NARAYAN: Seeks to Hire 'Ordinary Course' Professionals
-----------------------------------------------------------
Breckenridge Hills Fuel, LLC and Shri Narayan, LLC seek approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
to hire professionals used in the ordinary course of their
business.

The "ordinary course" professionals are:

     Butsch Roberts & Associates LLC
     231 S Bemiston Ave #260
     Clayton, MO 63105
     Phone: +1 314-863-5700
      -- Litigation

     Cunningham Rayfield & Bouchard PC
     P.O. Box 229
     Crystal City, MO 63019-1037
      -- Litigation

     Mid-City Accounting Services, LLC
     5701 Southwest Ave
     St. Louis, MO 63139
      -- Tax Preparation

The Debtors will pay 100 percent of the post-petition fees and
disbursements incurred up to $5,000 per month per OCP or $25,000
per OCP over the life of the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

                   About Breckenridge Hills Fuel
                         and Shri Narayan

Breckenridge Hills Fuel, LLC leases out two gas stations and
convenience stores located at 1125 Sycamore Lane, St. Clair, Mo.
and 4390 Telegraph Road, St. Louis, Mo.  Shri Narayan, LLC owns and
operates two gas stations and convenience stores located at 1999
Highway Z, Pevely, Mo., and 416 Benham St., Bonne Terre, Mo.

Breckenridge Hills Fuel and Shri Narayan filed petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case Nos.
21-41572 and 21-41573) on April 25, 2021.  Milapkumar P. Patel,
member and manager of the Debtors, also sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 21-41571) on April 25, 2021.
The cases are jointly administered under Case No. 21-41571).  Judge
Bonnie L. Clair presides over the cases.  

Breckenridge Hills Fuel and Shri Narayan disclosed total assets of
up to $50,000 and liabilities of up to $10 million at the time of
the filing.

The Debtors are represented by Angela Redden-Jansen, Esq.


SQUARE INC: Fitch Assigns FirstTime 'BB' LT IDR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a first-time Long-Term Issuer Default
Rating (IDR) of 'BB' to Square Inc.. The Rating Outlook is Stable.
The ratings impact approximately $3.5 billion of debt outstanding
at December 2020, not including undrawn capacity on the company's
revolver and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) facility, and a
projected $2.0 billion issuance of new senior unsecured notes. The
announced debt issuance will be used for general corporate
purposes, including organic growth investments and potential
acquisitions over time.

Fitch also assigned first-time, issue-level ratings of 'BB'/'RR4'
to the company's $500 million senior unsecured revolver, senior
unsecured convertible notes and the announced senior unsecured
notes.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

High Growth Fintech Leader: Fitch believes Square is positioned
well to capitalize on secular growth areas in payments and consumer
financial services. It is among the market leaders in small
business point of sale (POS) hardware-software solutions and also
quickly became one of the U.S. leaders in peer-to-peer payments and
crypto trading. The company witnessed tremendous growth over the
past decade, with 2020 gross profit of $2.7 billion versus $65
million in 2012. Gross profit is a key metric to focus on given the
bitcoin trading business grew significantly since 2018 and has
skewed reported revenue, as bitcoin transactions are reported on a
gross basis.

Beneficiary of Secular Payments Shift: Square operates at the
intersection of an industry shift away from cash to electronic
forms of payment, which Fitch believes will provide a continued
revenue tailwind in the coming years. According to Mastercard, card
usage is approximately 56% of global personal consumption
expenditures (PCE) and will continue to grow as a portion of
overall spending in the years ahead. Square serves the physical and
omni-channel retail POS market as well as digital app-based
payments that continue to benefit from a broader adoption of
digital and mobile-based payments. Increased reliance by consumers
on electronic payment forms will continue to support revenue growth
in the coming years.

Profitability Below Peers: Fitch views Square's profitability as a
limiting factor for the IDR, as the company continues to invest
heavily to grow its Seller business and Cash App. Fitch does not
believe Cash App is materially profitable at the EBITDA level but
will scale over time. Square publicly guided for material opex
growth in 2021, which will further limit profit growth in the near
term. However, Fitch believes high incremental margins typical for
payments businesses could improve profit generation materially over
time. Fitch estimates Square could generate EBITDA in excess of $1
billion by 2023-2024 (potentially sooner depending on growth
investments), or materially above near break-even levels in
2015-2016. However, margins will likely remain below those of its
payment industry peers due to growth investments and GAAP
reporting.

High but Evolving Leverage: Gross leverage is high following
pandemic-driven EBITDA pressures and incremental debt taken on in
the past 12-18 months. Fitch expects leverage to improve materially
over the next few years and could trend toward the 3x-4x range via
a combination of EBITDA growth and potentially lower debt with
convertible debt conversions. However, leverage could remain high
if there were a material share price pullback given a lower
likelihood of convertibles being converted. Importantly, Square
operates with net cash currently although M&A could change this
over time.

Significant Financial Flexibility: Fitch views Square as having
high financial flexibility given: (i) positive FCF generation since
2017 (average 78% annual EBITDA conversion), (ii) $6.3 billion of
cash and investments PF for the pending senior notes issuance,
(iii) a $500 million senior unsecured revolver, and (iv) a market
cap of more than $90 billion that further affords it various
avenues to external financing. The company also has meaningful
investments in bitcoin and equity investments (largely in DoorDash
tied to its 2019 Caviar divestiture) totaling nearly $900 million.

Coronavirus Impact Muted: Fitch believes Square executed well
throughout the pandemic to date, despite significant exposure to
in-store retail that comprised the majority of sales historically.
Seller revenue was down 17% in 2Q20, but sales rapidly returned to
double digit growth in 2H20 despite stay-at-home initiatives. This
performance was driven by growth in e-commerce and contactless, new
merchants and improved U.S. consumer spending. Cash App performed
extremely well through the pandemic as consumers, with FY20 segment
gross profit up 2.7x to $1.2 billion and monthly active users up
50% to 36 million.

Competitive, Fragmented End Markets: Fitch views Square's end
markets as huge and fragmented, but also highly competitive. The
Seller payments business continues to evolve as more U.S.
merchants, particularly smaller ones that were Square's core
customers historically, adopt card and electronic forms of payment.
Square's Seller business faces competition not only from newer,
software-centric POS providers such as Toast, Clover and others,
but also from legacy merchant acquirers & hardware POS providers,
and e-commerce providers such as PayPal and Stripe. Its Cash App
segment is also very competitive, with Square vying for share from
banks, large tech providers, and stock brokerage firms, among
others.

Ownership Concentration: Fitch views founder and Chairman/CEO Jack
Dorsey's ownership and control position, with 51% of voting power,
as meaningful to the rating. The company has a very successful
track record of execution, but the voting control is an important
credit consideration for investors given the potential for
shareholder interests to become misaligned with those of lenders
over time. It also presents key-person risk if Mr. Dorsey were to
leave or be removed from the company. The CEO is also CEO of
another public company he co-founded, Twitter, Inc. Fitch views the
ownership concentration as a factor in ESG considerations, with a
'4' rating that could have a negative impact over time to the
overall IDR.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Square's ratings reflect its strong market position in each of its
segments, historic growth profile, positive FCF generation in
recent years, significant cash on the balance sheet (net cash) and
secular growth in each of its main businesses. Offsetting
attributes include a lower margin profile versus fintech industry
peers and gross leverage that is higher versus industry leaders.
The scale of Square's business (EBITDA) and more limited
diversification versus certain higher rated peers are also limited
factors to the rating.

PayPal Holdings, Inc. (A-/Stable) and Fidelity National Information
Services, Inc. (BBB/Positive) are among the leading U.S. and global
fintech issuers and each operates with lower leverage, materially
higher EBITDA and margins, and a track record of strong, growing
FCFs. PayPal also has a stronger market position in its core
e-commerce payment solutions business. NCR Corporation (BB-/Stable)
has a relatively similar revenue and FCF scale to Square and is
expected to operate at similar gross leverage levels in the coming
years, although Square has a materially stronger growth profile and
has net cash. Relative to these issuers and other fintech,
payments, and software-oriented peers rated by Fitch, Fitch
believes the IDR is well positioned at the 'BB' category.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Revenue grows by high-20% CAGR through 2024, driven by
    improved consumer spending patterns post pandemic, organic
    growth in Cash App, and incremental M&A;

-- EBITDA margin expansion is limited due to significant
    projected opex investments. Reported margins are also skewed
    lower due to the material scale of bitcoin revenue, which is
    reported on a gross transaction value basis;

-- Fitch assumes Square will build cash in the absence of
    material acquisitions. Fitch forecasts modest M&A spend,
    although the company has significantly more flexibility
    currently to do deals;

-- Fitch assumes debt and leverage both decline through 2023-2024
    as the company realizes significant EBITDA growth and gross
    debt declines with the PPP facility rolling off and portions
    of the in-the-money convertible notes outstanding are assumed
    converted.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- EBITDA scales to $750 million or higher, while gross leverage
    remains within Fitch's bands outlined below;

-- Gross leverage, Fitch-defined as total debt with equity
    credit/operating EBITDA, sustained below 4.25x;

-- FCF margins expected to be sustained at 6.5% or above.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Gross leverage sustained above 5.25x;

-- FCF margins expected to be sustained near 3% or below;

-- Significant fundamental shifts in the business that negatively
    affect revenue, EBITDA and/or FCF;

-- A significantly lower level of financial flexibility could
    also lead Fitch to reassess the rating.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Improving Liquidity Expected: Square has strong and stable access
to liquidity in various forms, particularly given its net cash
position. Fitch expects its liquidity will improve in the coming
years as the business further scales and margins and FCF improve
over time. As of December 2020, the company had the following key
sources of liquidity: (i) $4.3 billion of cash and investments;
(ii) an undrawn $500 million senior unsecured revolver facility;
and (iii) strong FCF generation that ranged from $230 million-$400
million from 2018-2020.

The company also has significant access to the capital markets,
given its high market cap and multiple convertible debt issuances
in recent years. It also has investments that could be monetized if
needed but that Fitch has not included in Fitch's readily available
cash nor net leverage calculations including: (i) approximately
$473 million of bitcoin investments ($220 million cost basis) as of
March 2021; and (ii) $376 million of equity ownership in DoorDash,
Inc. (shares received as part of Caviar divestiture).

Debt Structure: Since its IPO, Square historically relied upon the
convertible debt market for most of its external capital needs. The
company had $3.0 billion of convertible note issuances outstanding
at December 2020, but approximately $1.9 billion of these notes are
materially "in-the-money" and Fitch projects could convert into
equity in the next few years. Fitch expects the conversion could be
settled via new Class A shares. The company also has an undrawn
$500 million senior unsecured revolver and announced $2 billion of
senior notes issuance.

In addition to its revolver and convertibles notes, Square has $464
million outstanding on a facility related to the Paycheck
Protection Program (PPP) that Fitch considers as debt for leverage
calculations. Square Capital has acted as a facilitator of loans to
small businesses since April 2020, whereby it borrows from the
Federal Reserve via its PPP facility (capacity up to $1 billion)
and provides loans to merchants that meet certain requirements.

The PPP was created to provide funding for businesses affected by
the coronavirus pandemic. Merchant borrowers may qualify for debt
forgiveness in certain instances. Via the PPP facility, subsidiary
Square Capital provides two- or five-year loans at a 1% fixed
interest rate, while Square pays 0.35% on the facility. Since
inception, Square has retained some of these loans while selling
others to institutional third-party investors. These loans are
non-recourse to Square, secured by a pledge of PPP loans held by
Square Capital, and the Small Business Administration (SBA) has
guaranteed the loans. Square still bears some risk if it fails to
meet certain requirements.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Square has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for Governance Structure
due to its significant control and ownership by CEO and Chairman
Jack Dorsey. Mr. Dorsey has been a key force behind the company's
success historically and will likely remain so in the years ahead,
which presents both key-person risk as well as risks of misaligned
incentives between shareholder and debt holder interests. This
factor was a consideration, in conjunction with other factors, used
in Fitch's rating analysis that could have a negative impact over
time to the overall IDR.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.


STAR US BIDCO: Moody's Alters Outlook on B3 CFR to Positive
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the ratings of Star US Bidco,
LLC (aka Sundyne) including its B3 Corporate Family Rating and
B3-PD Probability of Default Ratings. Concurrently, Moody's
affirmed the company's B3 first lien senior secured revolver,
letters of credit facility and term loan ratings. The rating
outlook was changed to positive from negative.

The change in outlook to positive from negative reflects Moody's
expectation that the company will maintain robust EBITDA margins
and generate positive free cash flow while maintaining good
liquidity. The positive outlook also reflects the company's better
than expected operating performance amid the pandemic, supported by
recurring aftermarket business and improving fundamentals in its
end markets including petrochemical, LNG and refining.

Moody's took the following rating actions:

Affirmations:

Issuer: Star US Bidco, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B3 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Star US Bidco, LLC

Outlook, Changed To Positive From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Sundyne's B3 CFR reflects the company's high leverage and
relatively modest size. The ratings also reflect the company's
considerable exposure to the cyclical energy sector. However, with
a large installed base of its equipment currently serving customers
across multiple industries, Sundyne generates a significant portion
of its revenue and gross profit from the higher-margin aftermarket
business. This provides stability to a large portion of Sundyne's
business, offsetting much of the risk of its OE energy exposure. As
well, the company benefits from the mission-critical nature of its
products, robust EBITDA margins, and well-established relationships
with a blue-chip customer base supported by strong brands in niche
markets.

Sundyne has very good liquidity. Moody's expects that the company
will continue to generate strong free cash flow over the next few
years while maintaining cash reserves in excess of $25 million.
Sundyne has an undrawn $100 million revolver and separate letters
of credit facilities, with ample headroom under its springing
financial maintenance covenant.

From a corporate governance perspective, Moody's notes that the
company's high leverage profile reflects in part its private equity
ownership. Potential debt-funded acquisitions or dividends paid to
the sponsor present ongoing event risk.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Sundyne's ratings could be downgraded if there is an erosion in
liquidity and leverage (Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA) exceeds 8x,
annual free cash flow turns negative, or EBITA/interest trends
towards 1.0x. The loss of a major customer, with volumes not
replaced, could also drive negative ratings pressure. A more
aggressive financial policy, including a sizable debt-financed
dividend, would also exert downward ratings pressure.

Ratings could be upgraded if the company demonstrates steady
revenue and earnings growth such that debt/EBITDA is sustained
below 6x and EBITA/interest remains above 2.0x. The continued
strong free cash flow would also be required to support a
prospective ratings upgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Manufacturing
Methodology published in March 2020.

Headquartered in Arvada, Colorado, Sundyne is a manufacturer of
pumps and compressors sold primarily to the mid and downstream oil
& gas end-market in addition to chemicals and industrial sectors.
The company was carved-out from Accudyne Industries in February
2020 and is owned by private equity sponsor Warburg Pincus.


STREAM TV: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Case as Bad-Faith Filing
--------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that a Delaware bankruptcy judge on Monday, May 17,
2021, dismissed television technology company Stream TV's Chapter
11 case, saying it was a bad-faith attempt to interfere with a
court judgment handing the company's assets over to its creditors.


In a virtual bench ruling following two days of testimony and
argument last week, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Karen Owens said Stream
TV's Chapter 11 was not an honest attempt to reorganize but a "last
ditch" effort to delay the handover of the company's assets under
an agreement with SeeCubic Inc.  "It was designed to stop SeeCubic
and the secured creditors from fully implementing the omnibus
agreement."

                      About Stream TV Networks

Philadelphia, Pa.-based Stream TV Networks, Inc. develops
technology intended to display three-dimensional content without
the use of 3D glasses.

On Feb. 24, 2021, Stream TV Networks filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 21-10433). Stream TV Networks CEO Mathu
Rajan signed the petition.  In the petition, the Debtor listed
assets of about $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.  Judge Karen B. Owens oversees the
case. Dilworth Paxson, LLP, led by Martin J. Weis, Esq., is the
Debtor's counsel.


SYNRGO INC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Synrgo, Inc.
        590 W. Lambert Road
        Brea, CA 92821

Business Description: Synrgo, Inc. -- https://synrgo.com --
                      is a provider of real estate document
                      recording and post-closing services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 18, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 21-11264

Judge: Hon. Erithe A. Smith

Debtor's Counsel: Sean A. OKeefe, Esq.
                  OKEEFE & ASSOCIATES LAW CORPORATION, PC
                  26 Executive Park
                  Suite 250
                  Irvine, CA 92614
                  Tel: (949) 334-4135
                  Email: sokeefe@okeefelawcorporation.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

The petition was signed by Karl Klessig, chairman and sole Board
member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/W5STOFQ/Synrgo_Inc__cacbke-21-11264__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


TECT AEROSPACE: May 25 Hearing on Bid Procedures for Everett Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Karen B. Owens of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware granted the request of TECT Aerospace Group Holdings
Inc. and affiliates to shorten the notice and objection periods for
their proposed bidding procedures in connection with the auction
sale of their Everett, Washington assets.

The hearing to consider the relief with respect to the Bidding
Procedures and related relief requested in the Bidding Procedures
Motion, and the Motion to Seal, will be held on May 25, 2021, at
10:00 a.m. (ET).  Objections, if any, to the relief with respect to
the Bidding Procedures and related relief, and the Motion to Seal,
must be filed by May 20, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. (ET).  

The Order will be immediately effective and enforceable upon its
entry.  The Debtors are authorized to take all action necessary to
implement the relief granted in the Order.

                        About TECT Aerospace

TECT Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc., and its affiliates
manufacture
high precision components and assemblies for the aerospace
industry, specializing in complex structural and mechanical
assemblies, and, machined components for a variety of aerospace
applications.  TECT produces assemblies and parts used in flight
controls, fuselage/interior structures, doors, wings, landing
gear,
and cockpits.

TECT operates manufacturing facilities in Everett, Washington, and
Park City and Wellington, Kansas and their corporate headquarters
is located in Wichita, Kansas.  TECT currently employs
approximately 400 individuals nationwide.

TECT and its affiliates are privately held companies owned by
Glass
Holdings, LLC and related Glass-owned or Glass controlled
entities.


TECT Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc., and six affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 21-10670) on April
6, 2021.

TECT Aerospace estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities of $100 million to $500 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., as counsel;
WINTER HARBOR, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and IMPERIAL
CAPITAL,
LLC, as investment banker.  KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS LLC is the
claims agent.

The Boeing Company, as DIP Agent, is represented by:

     Alan D. Smith, Esq.
     Perkins Coie LLP
     E-mail: ADSmith@perkinscoie.com

          - and -

     Kenneth J. Enos, Esq.
     Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP
     E-mail: kenos@ycst.com



TENTLOGIX INC: Proposed Private Sales of Goods and ACUs Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mindy A. Mora of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida authorized Tentlogix Inc.'s private sales of
the soft goods, generators, and air conditioning units listed in
Exhibit A for the Liquidation Value listed therein, free and clear
of any liens.

So long as the Debtor sells the asset for at least the amount
listed on Exhibit A, no further action needs to be taken by the
Debtor.  In the event it seeks to sell an asset for less than the
value referenced in Exhibit A, the Debtor must obtain further
approval of the Court to sell the asset.

A copy of the Exhibit A is available at https://tinyurl.com/9j59bwc
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                       About Tentlogix Inc.

Tentlogix Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-22971) on Nov. 27, 2020.  Gary Hendry, chief
executive officer, signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3,135,866 in
assets and $10,689,420 in liabilities.

Judge Mindy A. Mora oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Kelley, Fulton & Kaplan, P.L. as its legal
counsel and Carr Riggs & Ingram as its accountant.



TOPP'S MECHANICAL: D & K Agri Buying 2004 Grove Crane for $200K
---------------------------------------------------------------
Topp's Mechanical, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nebraska to authorize the sale of the 2004 Grove
TMS900E 90 Ton Rough Terrain Crane, S/N 223700, with a Nelson
3-Axle Dolly, VIN 1N9G62A3541012808, including all attachments and
accessories thereto, to D & K Agri Sales, Inc., for $200,000.

The Debtor is the owner of the Grove Crane.  It no longer operates
the Grove Crane as a part of its business and desires to sell
same.

The Debtor has contracted to sell the Grove Crane to the Buyer, a
Nebraska corporation, subject to the Court's approval, for a
purchase price of $200,000.

The Buyer required the Debtor to have the Grove Crane inspected
before Buyer would make an offer to purchase the Grove Crane.  The
inspection revealed that the Grove Crane requires repairs that will
cost approximately $25,000, which the Buyer will assume following
the sale of the Grove Crane.  The Debtor paid the inspection fee in
the amount of $1,288.71.

The Debtor is not aware of any direct or indirect relationship
between the proceedings in the above-captioned matter, including
any case related thereto, and the Buyer or the Buyer's firm,
partnership, corporation or any other form of business association
or relationship, including all members, associates and professional
employees thereof.

Upon information and belief, the Buyer is ready, willing and able
to close on its purchase of the Grove Crane.

First Midwest Equipment Finance Co. has a first position security
interest in the Grove Crane as a result of a purchase money
security interest therein, and the amount remaining due by Debtor
to First Midwest is approximately $172,299.50, as set forth in
First Midwest's Proof of Claim filed in the bankruptcy proceeding
on March 16, 2021.   

American Exchange Bank ("AEB") has a second position security
interest in the Grove Crane as a part of its blanket security
interest in the personal property of the Debtor, and the amount
remaining due by Debtor to AEB is greater than any expected
proceeds from the sale of the Grove Crane.

James M. Rush and Lisa F. Rush claim a security interest in the
Grove Crane pursuant to a UCC Financing Statement filed on Dec. 14,
2020, Filing Document #2012000647-4.  The Debtor disputes that the
Rushes have a valid security interest in the Grove Crane because
the alleged debt claimed by the Rushes is personal to Luke Topp and
Ria Topp, Debtor’s shareholders, the debt was not guaranteed by
the Debtor, and there is no security agreement between Debtor and
the Rushes wherein Debtor granted the Rushes a security interest in
the Grove Crane.  

The proceeds from the sale of the Grove Crane will first be used to
reimburse the Debtor for the cost of the inspection that was
required to be performed before Buyer would make an offer to
purchase, then to pay off the balance owed to First Midwest, and
then the remainder will be applied against the outstanding balance
owed to AEB.  Except for the reimbursement of the inspection fee,
none of the proceeds from the sale of the Grove Crane will be paid
to the Debtor.

Uupon distribution of sale proceeds to First Midwest, First Midwest
will release its lien noted on the title to the Grove Crane,
terminate any financing statement on file with the Nebraska
Secretary of State related to the Grove Crane, and deliver the
title to the Grove Crane to Debtor so that it can be endorsed and
transferred to the Buyer.

Upon distribution of sale proceeds to AEB, AEB will release its
lien, if any, noted on the title to the Grove Crane, and amend any
financing statement on file with the Nebraska Secretary of State to
remove the Grove Crane from the description of collateral that AEB
is claiming a security interest in.

It is in the best interests of Debtor, the bankruptcy estate and
creditors that the sale of the Grove Crane be free and clear of any
lien asserted by the Rushes since the Rushes do not have a valid
security interest in the Grove Crane.

The Debtor's tax basis in the Property is $91,480.  There is no
anticipated capital gain or loss, or anticipated net taxable income
from the sale because there will not be any net proceeds received
by Debtor from the sale of the Grove Crane.

                   About Topp's Mechanical

Topp's Mechanical Inc., a mechanical contractor in Tecumseh, Neb.,
filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 21-40038) on Jan. 15,
2021.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Thomas L. Saladino oversees the case.

Justin D. Eichmann, Esq., at Houghton Bradford Whitted PC, LLO, is
the Debtor's legal counsel.



TRANQUILITY GROUP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 13 disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Tranquility Group, LLC.
  
                      About Tranquility Group

Tranquility Group owns a vacation destination offering tree houses,
log cabins, and bungalows.

Tranquility Group filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No.
21-60120) on Feb. 26, 2021.  Michael R. Hyams, chief operating
officer and partner, signed the petition.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor had between $1 million and $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  Berman, DeLeve, Kuchan & Chapman, LLC
represents the Debtor as legal counsel.


TRANS-LUX CORP: Incurs $621K Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------
Trans-Lux Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $621,000 on $2.59 million of total revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2021, compared to a net loss of $1.04 million on
$1.91 million of total revenues for the three months ended March
31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $7.37 million in total
assets, $15 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $7.64 million.

"Due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the Company
experienced a reduction in sales orders from customers. As a
result, the Company incurred a net loss of $621,000 in the three
months ended March 31, 2021 and had a working capital deficiency of
$6.3 million as of March 31, 2021," Trans-Lux said.

"The Company is dependent on future operating performance in order
to generate sufficient cash flows in order to continue to run its
businesses.  Future operating performance is dependent on general
economic conditions, as well as financial, competitive and other
factors beyond our control, including the impact of the current
economic environment, the spread of major epidemics (including
coronavirus) and other related uncertainties such as
government-imposed travel restrictions, interruptions to supply
chains and extended shut down of businesses.  In order to more
effectively manage its cash resources, the Company had, from time
to time, increased the timetable of its payment of some of its
payables, which delayed certain product deliveries from our
vendors, which in turn delayed certain deliveries to our
customers," Trans-Lux further said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/99106/000151316221000070/form10q.htm

                          About Trans-Lux

Headquartered in New York, New York, Trans-Lux Corporation --
http://www.trans-lux.com-- designs and manufactures TL Vision
digital video displays for the financial, sports and entertainment,
gaming, education, government, and commercial markets.  With a
comprehensive offering of LED Large Screen Systems, LCD Flat Panel
Displays, Data Walls and scoreboards (marketed under Fair-Play by
Trans-Lux), Trans-Lux delivers comprehensive video display
solutions for any size venue's indoor and outdoor display needs.

Trans-Lux reported a net loss of $4.84 million for the 12 months
ended Dec. 31, 2020, a net loss of $1.40 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, and a net loss of $4.69 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $7.05 million
in total assets, $14.10 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $7.05 million.

New Haven, CT-based Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since 2015,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated April
15, 2021, citing that the Company has a significant working capital
deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise
additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


TRIUMPH HOUSING: Unsecureds to Share Funds After $25K Suit Reserve
------------------------------------------------------------------
Triumph Housing Management, LLC, filed with the Bankruptcy Court a
Second Plan of Reorganization and a corresponding Disclosure
Statement.

The Plan proposes to satisfy unclassified claims in full.  The
Debtor said it has sufficient unencumbered funds on hand to pay all
anticipated administrative expenses, without use of funds to which
parties who paid insurance premiums might assert a claim.

Classes of Claims and Their Treatment Under the Plan:

   * Class 1 - priority unsecured tax claims of the Internal
Revenue Service for $400.  The Debtor has sufficient cash on hand
to pay the claim if that claim is allowed.

   * Class 2 - unsecured claims of insurance premium contributors.
Unsecured claims related to creditors who provided insurance
premium payments that were the subject of pre-petition litigation
and a pre-petition settlement between Debtor and General Star
Indemnity Company.  The Debtor contends that no priority treatment
is appropriate for claims of the Premium Contributors.  The Premium
Contributors are impaired and therefore entitled to vote on the
Plan.

   * Class 3 - non-priority, general unsecured claims.  General
unsecured claims will be paid, on a pro-rata basis, any remaining
funds after distribution of funds described for Classes 1 and 2 and
any administrative expenses.  General unsecured claimants are
impaired and therefore entitled to vote on the Plan.

The Debtor remains involved in litigation seeking to recover funds
from insurance agents, with its suit against The Cone Company, Inc.
and AmWINS Brokerage of Alabama, LLC resuming in the District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia now that Debtor prevailed on
appeal in the Eleventh Circuit.  

The Plan provides that the Debtor may reserve up to $25,000 to fund
the litigation costs against AmWINS and Cone from funds that would
otherwise be distributed after confirmation of the Plan.  The
litigation arose before the Petition Date when Cone, which was
contracted by the Debtor to obtain liability insurance, contacted
AmWINS, a wholesale insurance broker, to assist Cone in placing
coverage for the Debtor's properties.  Cone and AmWINS contacted
General Star Indemnity Co. to underwrite the associated risks on a
scheduled coverage basis, contrary to Debtor's request for blanket
coverage.  GenStar thereafter refused to pay losses that occurred
on the Debtor's properties, leading to the Debtor's current
litigation involvement.
  
Pursuant to the Plan, the Debtor will make an initial distribution
shortly after the time of confirmation, from cash on hand, plus
annual distributions on the annual payment received from Weller
Workforce, LLC (if any).  The Debtor receives a 10% profit
distribution from Weller for settlement payments and future profits
from its ownership rights in Weller.

If Debtor prevails in the District Court litigation, or settles the
disputes with AmWINS and/or Cone, then any proceeds from that
litigation or those settlements will be distributed in the same
manner as provided in the Plan for other funds, after deducting
costs of litigation.

The Debtor anticipates that it will be managed post-confirmation by
its existing management, who will continue to serve in their
existing capacities.  The current management consists of Mr. Alex
Hertz and the Debtor's "back office" fulfillment personnel,
including Mr. Merrik Metcalf.

Certain developments on to the Debtor's litigations and disputes,
follow:

   * Debtor filed a motion to participate in mediation with Cone
and AmWINS, as well as TriMark Northside, LLC and Coppertree
Apartments, LLC, two creditors in this case, and participated in
that mediation.

   * Debtor, in conjunction with its appeal to the Eleventh Circuit
Court of Appeals, participated in a second mediation with Cone and
AmWINS.

   * Debtor reached a settlement with AmWINS for $50,000 and a
release of claims related to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
case.  Debtor sought approval of this settlement from the Court,
although the proposed settlement was not approved due to objections
from certain creditors to the sufficiency of the amount to be
received by the bankruptcy estate.

   * Debtor prevailed in its Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
arguments involving Cone and AmWINS such that litigation is
resuming against those parties in the District Court.

   * Debtor reached a settlement of a claim dispute with Trimark,
which is being submitted for Court approval.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available for free at
https://bit.ly/3uXx3Ij from PacerMonitor.com.

                 About Triumph Housing Management

Triumph Housing Management, LLC, a real estate service provider
based in Atlanta, filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 20-65578) on April
15, 2020. The petition was signed by Alex Hertz, its manager.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed total assets of
$877,090 and total liabilities of $8,074,355.  Judge Jeffery W.
Cavender oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped Robl Law Group LLC
as its counsel.


URBAN ONE: Posts $7K Net Income in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------
Urban One, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing consolidated net
income attributable to common stockholders of $7,000 on $91.44
million of net revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2021,
compared to a consolidated net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $23.19 million on $94.88 million of net revenue for
the three months ended March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2021, the Company had $1.17 billion in total
assets, $957.19 million in total liabilities, $12.74 million in
redeemable noncontrolling interests, and $198.83 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Alfred C. Liggins, III, Urban One's CEO and president stated,
"Normalizing for approximately $1.4 million of Richmond gaming
chase costs, which were one-time in nature, our Adjusted EBITDA was
down approximately 6.3% year over year, which was encouraging in
the context of pre-COVID radio comparatives for January and
February and a lack of political revenues.  It is worth noting that
compared to Q1 2019, which was a pre-pandemic and off-cycle
political quarter, our Adjusted EBITDA was up by approximately 4.1%
(and by 9.1% after normalizing for the Richmond gaming project).
Our core radio advertising was down approximately 13.7% for the
quarter, with January -28.4%, February -19.9% and March +8.8%.
Currently for second quarter, core radio is pacing up over 70%,
with April finishing at +89%.  Our digital business had another
strong quarter, with revenues up 64.6% and Adjusted EBITDA up by
approximately $3.2 million.  Cable TV revenues were down 2.6%, but
Adjusted EBITDA of approximately $24.8 million was 14.5% higher
than Q1 2019 (approximately $21.7 million), which is a more
realistic comparison than the COVID-impacted Q1 2020, during which
content production and marketing were effectively shut-off.  Under
the circumstances, we delivered a solid first quarter, and I
anticipate further sequential improvements in Q2."

During the quarter ended March 31, 2021, the Company saved
approximately $1.0 million in employee compensation expenses and
$654,000 in reduced travel and office expenses due to its cost
savings initiatives.  The Company also saved approximately $1.1
million in lower program content amortization expense at its cable
television segment.  These savings were offset by an increase of
approximately $1.3 million in marketing spend.  Finally, the
increase in corporate selling, general and administrative expenses
for the three months ended March 31, 2021, compared to the same
period in 2020 is primarily due to an increase in expenses of
approximately $1.4 million related to corporate development
activities related to potential gaming and other similar business
activities.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased to approximately
$2.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2021, compared to
approximately $2.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2020.

Interest expense decreased to approximately $18.0 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2021, compared to approximately $19.1
million for the quarter ended March 31, 2020.  The Company made
cash interest payments of approximately $13.9 million on its
outstanding debt for the quarter ended March 31, 2021, compared to
cash interest payments of approximately $13.9 million on its
outstanding debt for the quarter ended March 31, 2020.  As of March
31, 2020, the Company had approximately $27.5 million in borrowings
outstanding on its ABL Facility.  There was no balance outstanding
on March 31, 2021.  As previously announced, on Jan. 25, 2021, the
Company closed on a new senior secured notes.  The proceeds from
the 2028 Notes were used to prepay in full (1) the 2017 Credit
Facility, (2) the 2018 Credit Facility, (3) the MGM National Harbor
Loan; (4) the remaining amounts of the Company's 7.375% Notes, and
(5) its 8.75% Notes that were issued in the November 2020 Exchange
Offer.  There was a net loss on retirement of debt of approximately
$6.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 associated with
these transactions.

The impairment of long-lived assets for the three months ended
March 31, 2020, was related to a non-cash impairment charge of
approximately $5.9 million recorded to reduce the carrying value of
the Company's Atlanta and Indianapolis market goodwill balances and
a charge of approximately $47.7 million associated with our
Atlanta, Cincinnati, Dallas, Houston, Indianapolis, Philadelphia,
Raleigh, Richmond and St. Louis radio market broadcasting licenses.


During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the benefit from
income taxes decreased to $10,000 compared to approximately $21.9
million for the three months ended March 31, 2020.  The decrease in
the benefit from income taxes was primarily due to the application
of the estimated annual effective tax rate for the year to date and
pre-tax income of $451,000 during the quarter, and discrete tax
provision adjustments for excess tax benefits related to restricted
stock units.  For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the
benefit from income taxes was approximately $21.9 million.  The
increase in the benefit from income taxes was primarily due to the
application of the actual effective tax rate for the year to date
and pre-tax loss of approximately $44.9 million during the quarter,
and discrete tax provision adjustments to previously unrecognized
deferred tax assets that the Company believes it can now benefit
from in future periods.  The Company received a refund of taxes of
$32,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2021 and did not pay taxes
for the quarter ended March 31, 2020.

Other income, net, was approximately $1.7 million and $1.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Company recognized other income in the amount of approximately
$1.7 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2021 and 2020, respectively, related to its MGM investment.

The increase in noncontrolling interests in income of subsidiaries
was due primarily to higher net income recognized by Reach Media
during the three months ended March 31, 2021 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2020.

Other pertinent financial information includes capital expenditures
of $804,000 and approximately $1.4 million for the quarters ended
March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

During the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company
did not repurchase any shares of Class A or Class D common stock.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1041657/000110465921066535/tm2111736d1_10q.htm

                          About Urban One

Headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland, Urban One, Inc. (together
with its subsidiaries) -- www.urban1.com -- is an urban-oriented,
multi-media company that primarily targets African-American and
urban consumers.  The Company's core business is its radio
broadcasting franchise which is the largest radio broadcasting
operation that primarily targets African-American and urban
listeners.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company owned or operated 63
independently formatted, revenue producing broadcast stations
(including 54 FM or AM stations, 7 HD stations, and the 2 low power
television stations it operates) located in 13 of the most populous
African-American markets in the United States.  While a core source
of the Company's revenue has historically been and remains the sale
of local and national advertising for broadcast on its radio
stations, its strategy is to operate the premier multi-media
entertainment and information content provider targeting
African-American and urban consumers.

Urban One received notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. that
as a result of the resignation of Geoffrey Armstrong as a director
of the Company effective Nov. 23, 2020 the Company was no longer in
compliance with Nasdaq's audit committee requirements as set forth
in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605 since Mr. Armstrong had been a
member of the audit committee.

Urban One reported a consolidated net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $8.11 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020.  As
of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $1.19 billion in total assets,
$995.89 million in total liabilities, $12.70 million in redeemable
noncontrolling interests, and $186.90 million in total
stockholders' equity.


VICTORY CAPITAL: Moody's Upgrades CFR to Ba2, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded Victory Capital Holdings,
Inc.'s corporate family rating and senior secured debt rating to
Ba2 from Ba3. The rating agency also upgraded the company's
probability of default rating to Ba2-PD from Ba3-PD. The outlook on
the ratings remain stable.

A summary of the rating action follows:

Upgrades:

Issuer: Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, upgraded to Ba2 from Ba3

Probability of Default Rating, upgraded to Ba2-PD from Ba3-PD

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, upgraded to Ba2 from Ba3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Victory Capital Holdings, Inc.

Outlook, remains stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The upgrade reflects the improvement to the company's revenue
scale, leverage, AUM mix diversification and profitability metrics
since its acquisition of USAA Asset Management Company (USAA AMCO)
in 2019. Victory's larger scale and increased profitability has
contributed to stronger cash flow generation which has allowed for
meaningful debt paydown over the last two years. While the company
recently indicated an appetite for more transformational M&A
publicly, Moody's believe it has room within its current rating
level to execute a large debt-financed acquisition.

The acquisition and successful integration of USAA AMCO has
significantly enhanced Victory's business profile. Assets under
management totaled $154 billion at March 31, 2021 compared to about
$60 billion just prior to the closing of the transaction. The new
business has almost doubled revenues, improved GAAP profit margins
and provided Victory with investment capabilities, particularly in
fixed income and solutions offerings that Moody's believe will
drive industry growth in coming years. Equally important, Victory
now has a direct line to a large affinity group with high retention
rates.

Victory has prioritized deleveraging by paying down over 35% of the
original principal on the debt used to fund the USAA AMCO
acquisition; and engaged in several transactions to reduce its
interest expense burden. At March 31 leverage stood at about 2.4
times debt-to-EBITDA, as adjusted by Moody's, down from about 5
times following the close of the transaction. The company repriced
its credit facility to reduce the margin payable on LIBOR by an
aggregate 100 basis points and executed a floating-to-fixed
interest rate swap to further reduce its interest expense burden.

Victory's Ba2 CFR reflects its strong profitability, exclusive ties
to the USAA membership channel, and diverse product offerings
provided by franchises operating under its integrated
multi-boutique structure. Constraining the company's rating is its
concentrated exposure to US equities, weak asset resiliency, and
modest size relative to the broader financial services sector.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's could upgrade Victory's ratings if: 1) sustained asset
inflows drive organic growth and improve asset resiliency rates to
or above industry averages; 2) financial leverage (debt/EBITDA as
calculated by Moody's) is maintained at current levels; or 3)
profitability as measured by pre-tax income margins are sustained
above 20%.

Alternatively, the following factors could lead to a downgrade of
Victory's ratings if: 1) asset decay is sustained such that net
client redemptions exceed 3% of firm AUM per year; 2) leverage
(debt/EBITDA as defined by Moody's) is maintained above 3.5x; or 3)
five-year pre-tax income margin decline to below 15%.

Victory is an integrated multi-boutique asset manager headquartered
in San Antonio, Texas. At March 31, the company had assets under
management of $154 billion and earned total revenues of
approximately $780 million over the last twelve months.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Asset Managers
Methodology published in Novemeber 2019.


VOYAGER AVIATION: Moody's Withdraws Caa1 CFR on Restructuring
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has withdrawn its ratings of Voyager
Aviation Holdings, LLC because the company as of May 10, 2021
completed the out-of-court restructuring of its $415 million senior
unsecured notes due August 2021 in a transaction that Moody's
regards as a distressed exchange. Approximately 98.5% of
noteholders supported Voyager's consent solicitation for the
restructuring.

Ratings withdrawn include:

Voyager Aviation Holdings, LLC:

Long-term corporate family rating (Caa1, previously on review for
downgrade)

Senior unsecured (Caa3, previously on review for downgrade)

Outlook, Rating Withdrawn from Rating Under Review

RATINGS RATIONALE

Governance was a consideration in this rating action, given the
change of control of Voyager associated with the debt
restructuring.


WEATHERFORD INT'L: Fends Off Investor Lawsuit Over Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jennifer Bennett of Bloomberg Law reports that Weatherford
International PLC is free of a would-be class suit alleging it
misled investors about its financial condition and plans ahead of a
bankruptcy declaration, a federal judge in Texas said.

Investors accused the oilfield services firm of giving several
false assurances about its finances despite considering bankruptcy
the whole time.  But the Weatherford statements they challenged
aren't actionable, and they didn't suggest the company
intentionally misled them, the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Texas said May 14, 2021.

Most of the company statements are forward-looking and protected
under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act's safe harbor
provision.

              About Weatherford International PLC

Weatherford (NYSE: WFT), an Irish public limited company and Swiss
tax resident -- http://www.weatherford.com/-- is a multinational
oilfield service company providing innovative solutions, technology
and services to the oil and gas industry. The Company operates in
over 80 countries and has a network of approximately 650 locations,
including manufacturing, service, research and development and
training facilities and employs approximately 26,000 people.

Weatherford reported a net loss attributable to the company of
$2.81 billion for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
loss attributable to the company of $2.81 billion for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  

As of March 31, 2019, Weatherford had $6.51 billion in total
assets, $10.62 billion in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficiency of $4.10 billion.

On July 1, 2019, Weatherford International plc, Weatherford
International, LLC, and Weatherford International Ltd. sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-33694).

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and Latham & Watkins
LLP as counsel; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as financial
advisor; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; and Prime
Clerk LLC as claims agent.

Henry Hobbs Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 7, on July 17,
2019, appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases.


WEINSTEIN CO: Trustee Seeks to Toss Plan Appeal of Claimants
------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that the liquidating trustee administering the
Chapter 11 plan of defunct movie studio The Weinstein Co. has told
a Delaware federal judge that the plan has largely been executed
and an appeal of its approval filed by a group of sexual misconduct
claimants is a moot point.

Dean A. Ziehl, the trustee selected to oversee the liquidation
trust of the former debtor, said in a motion to dismiss the appeal
Friday, May 14, 2021, that because the Chapter 11 plan has been
substantially consummated, the appeal is equitably moot as funds
set aside for sexual misconduct claimants have been distributed to
the fund set up for claimants.

                    About The Weinstein Company

The Weinstein Company (TWC) -- http://www.WeinsteinCo.com/-- is a
multimedia production and distribution company launched in 2005 in
New York by Bob and Harvey Weinstein, the brothers who founded
Miramax Films in 1979.  TWC also encompasses Dimension Films, the
genre label founded in 1993 by Bob Weinstein.  During Harvey and
Bob's tenure at Miramax and TWC, they have received 341 Oscar
nominations and won 81 Academy Awards.

TWC dismissed Harvey Weinstein in October 2017, after dozens of
women came forward to accuse him of sexual harassment, assault or
rape.

The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC and 54 affiliates sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-10601) on March 19,
2018, after reaching a deal to sell all assets to Lantern Asset
Management for $310 million.

The Weinstein Company Holdings estimated $500 million to $1 billion
in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities.

The Hon. Mary F. Walrath is the case judge.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel,
with the engagement led by Paul H. Zumbro, George E. Zobitz, and
Karin A. DeMasi, in New York.

Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., is the local counsel, with the
engagement headed by Mark D. Collins, Paul N. Heath, Zachary I.
Shapiro, Brett M. Haywood, and David T. Queroli, in Wilmington,
Delaware.

The Debtors also tapped FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring
advisor; Moelis & Company LLC as investment banker; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Pachulski
Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP as its legal counsel, and Berkeley
Research Group, LLC, as its financial advisor.


WHITE STALLION ENERGY: Wins Cash Collateral Access Thru June 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware has entered
an order extending the termination date of the Final Cash
Collateral order authorizing White Stallion Energy, LLC and
affiliates to use cash collateral.

The termination date is extended from May 14, 2021 to June 30,
2021.

The Debtors are authorized, subject to the terms and conditions of
the Final Order, to use Cash Collateral solely to the extent
permitted by, and as set forth in, the Budget. The Debtors' right
to use Cash Collateral will be subject in all respects to their
compliance with the Budget, and such right will terminate
automatically upon the earlier of (a) the occurrence of an Event of
Default, unless waived in writing by the Agent on behalf of the
Secured Parties in their sole discretion and (b) June 30, 2021,
unless extended in writing by the Agent on behalf of the Secured
Parties, in their sole discretion.

Except for the amended, the Final Cash Collateral Order remains in
full force and effect.

A copy of the order is available at https://bit.ly/33QnH5o from
Prime Clerk, the claims agent.

                   About White Stallion Energy

White Stallion Energy, LLC, was founded in February 2010 for the
purpose of developing and operating surface mining complexes in
Indiana and Illinois and subsequently grew through a series of
strategic acquisitions. It operates six high-quality, low-cost
thermal surface mines in Indiana and Illinois with approximately
200 million tons of demonstrated reserves.

On Dec. 2, 2020, White Stallion Energy and 18 affiliated debtors
each filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-13037) on Dec. 2,
2020.  White Stallion and its affiliates reported between $100
million and $500 million in assets and liabilities. On Jan. 26,
2021, Eagle River Coal, LLC filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition.
Eagle River is seeking for its case to be jointly administered with
the Initial Debtors' cases.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Paul Hastings LLP as bankruptcy counsel, Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as local counsel, and FTI
Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the
claims agent and administrative advisor.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.  The committee
tapped Cooley LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, Robinson & Cole LLP as
Delaware counsel, and Province LLC as financial advisor.

Riverstone Credit Management, LLC serves as DIP Agent.  Its
advisors are Bailey & Glasser LLP and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
LLP.



YOAKUM INDEPENDENT SCHOOL: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Issuer Default Rating
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the following Yoakum Independent School
District (ISD), TX ratings at 'BB':

-- Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR);

-- Approximately $36.4 million outstanding unlimited tax (ULT)
    bonds.

The Rating Watch Negative is removed. The Rating Outlook is
Negative.

SECURITY

The ULT bonds are payable from an unlimited annual property tax
levy.

ANALYTICAL CONCLUSION

The 'BB' IDR reflects continued weakness in operating performance
which has resulted in a negative fund balance and cash position and
a 'going concern' audit opinion in the last three fiscal years. The
Negative Outlook reflects concern about the district's ability to
sustain its recently improved liquidity. Resolution of the Negative
Outlook is predicated on the district's cash-flow trends and the
status of its financial resilience. Further deterioration in these
areas would lead to a downgrade.

The district's recent allocation of American Rescue Plan (ARP)
funds could materially improve its financial position but is
dependent on how the funds are utilized and the impact of ongoing
enrollment declines. The rating also incorporates the district's
slow revenue growth prospects and moderate long-term liabilities
and fixed costs. The rating also reflects an asymmetric economic
risk consideration based on the high taxpayer and energy sector
concentration within the district.

ECONOMIC RESOURCE BASE

Yoakum ISD is located about 100 miles east of San Antonio, TX in
the counties of Dewitt, Lavaca, and Gonzales. With an economy
historically based on agriculture, the district lies within the
Eagle Ford shale, one of the most actively drilled targets for
unconventional oil and gas in the U.S. Assessed valuation (AV)
tripled over fiscal years 2013-2015 due to the construction of a
large natural gas liquids (NGLs) processing plant.

However, due to an abatement agreement, nearly the entire value of
the processing plant is exempt for purposes of calculating the
maintenance and operation (M&O) levy. The abatement expires in
fiscal 2023. Also, Eagle Ford's output has dropped sharply since
fiscal 2016 due to the volatility in oil prices, leading gross AV
to decline by nearly one-third.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Revenue Framework: 'bbb'

Post-pandemic long-term revenue growth is expected to be in line
with inflation based on Fitch's expectation of periodic increases
in state per-pupil funding, tempered by negative enrollment trends.
The district's independent legal ability to raise revenues is
limited by state law.

Expenditure Framework: 'bbb'

Pressured by a declining enrollment environment, natural spending
growth is expected to be well above revenue growth. The fixed-cost
burden for debt service and retiree benefits is moderate. The
district's expenditure flexibility is adequate as it can still
implement manageable cuts to core services.

Long-Term Liability Burden: 'aa'

Fitch expects the liability burden to remain moderate as the
district has no future debt issuance plans and pension liabilities
are modest.

Operating Performance: 'bb'

The district's operating performance has deteriorated in recent
years, leaving it with limited gap-closing capacity given its
inherent limited budgetary flexibility, negative general fund
reserves and minimal cash levels.

Yoakum ISD has an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)
Relevance Score of '5' for Rule of Law, Institutional & Regulatory
Quality, Control of Corruption (GRL) due to poor financial
operating and capital management, culminating in operational
deficits and depletion of reserves resulting in negative balances
and a 'going concern' audit opinion. This position has a negative
impact on the credit profile and is highly relevant to the rating
and the Negative Outlook.

Yoakum ISD has an ESG Relevance Score of '5' for Government
Effectiveness due to poor operating and capital management. This
issue has a negative effect on the credit profile and is highly
relevant to the rating and the Negative Outlook.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Sustained reversal of negative enrollment trends, a principal
    driver for state funding, which would enhance revenue growth
    prospects;

-- Sustained balanced operations that stabilize operating
    performance and lead to a reversal of the accumulated deficit
    and negative cash position;

-- The Negative Outlook could be removed upon improvement of the
    district's cash-flow trends and financial resilience.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Continued minimal cash position, operational deficits and
    negative reserves;

-- Delayed management information or audits, or continuation of
    auditor opinions noting a 'going concern' risk;

-- A material, sustained decline in district enrollment post
    pandemic, leading Fitch to reassess the medium-term revenue
    growth prospects to below the rate of inflation.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS

Sector-wide Coronavirus Stimulus

The recently-enacted ARP will provide $350 billion in direct aid to
state and local governments and provide additional funding for
transit systems and school districts (through the states) as well
as a significant amount of economic stimulus that should have a
positive near-term impact on state and local government revenues.
Fitch does not expect the stimulus aid to alter the long-term
credit fundamentals of state and local governments but should
bridge near-term fiscal gaps.

District Budget Update

Yoakum ISD's financial position remains exceptionally weak, having
deteriorated with recent large operating deficits and a precipitous
decrease in its fund balance leading to negative balances since
fiscal 2018. The district attributes the dramatic drop in reserves
from a peak of 34% of spending in fiscal 2014 to poor management of
costs related to major capital improvement projects.

The audits for fiscal years 2018-2020 retained an unqualified
opinion, although they also stated there was "substantial doubt
about the district's ability to continue as a going concern" in all
three years. Despite its weak financial health, the district has
not declared financial exigency which would allow it to impose a
mid-year reduction in force. Also, the Texas Education Agency (TEA)
has not intervened to date.

Modest improvement to the district's financial reserves did not
materialize as budgeted in fiscal 2020. Audited results were
essentially balanced, leaving the negative fund balance at $1.9
million or 11% of spending. In fiscal 2020, average daily
attendance (ADA) declined by 8% due to the pandemic although state
funding was based on a smaller loss of 2.3% due to TEA's provision
of hold-harmless funding to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on
school district funding levels.

In general, this measure allows a district's projected ADA to be
calculated using a three-year average trend from final ADA from the
2017 to 2020 academic years. The hold-harmless provision will
remain in place for fiscal 2021. The adopted fiscal 2021 budget
cuts spending by $700,000 or 4%, including $300,000 from a
reduction of positions, and is projected to reduce the negative
fund balance by a modest $200,000.

Aided by the receipt of property taxes in January and February, the
district reports a cash position of $4.4 million for all
governmental funds as of May 13, 2021, equal to approximately 54
days of operations. Liquidity will likely trend downward through
the fiscal year end as reliance shifts mostly to monthly state aid
revenues although the imminent conclusion of the academic year will
mitigate the scale of the decline in liquidity.

Also, a significant boost in liquidity is expected in fiscal 2022
due to the district's $3.69 million allocation of Elementary and
Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) III funds, two-thirds of
which (approximately $2.5 million) is expected in September. The
planned uses of the ESSER funds include summer school classes and
HVAC improvements.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Yoakum ISD has an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)
Relevance Score of '5' for Rule of Law, Institutional & Regulatory
Quality, Control of Corruption (GRL) due to poor financial
operating and capital management, culminating in operational
deficits and depletion of reserves resulting in negative balances
and a 'going concern' audit opinion. This position has a negative
impact on the credit profile and is highly relevant to the rating
and the Negative Outlook.

Yoakum ISD has an ESG Relevance Score of '5' for Government
Effectiveness due to poor operating and capital management. This
issue has a negative effect on the credit profile and is highly
relevant to the rating and the Negative Outlook.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


YPF ENERGIA: Moody's Alters Outlook on 'Caa3' CFR to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed YPF Energia Electrica S.A.'s
(YPFEE) Caa3 corporate family and senior unsecured ratings. The
outlook for all ratings was changed to stable from negative.

Approximately $400 million of debt instruments affected.

RATINGS RATIONALE

YPFEE ratings affirmation and outlook stabilization acknowledge the
successful exchange of the company's Class 1 Notes ($100 million)
that was completed by the issuance of Class VI Notes for an amount
of $60 million, payable in full at maturity in April 2023, 2 years
from the issuance date and in compliance with Argentina's Central
Bank FX regulations. The un-exchanged amount under Class 1 notes
was paid in full at original maturity on May 10. Following the
transaction, which did not entail material losses to investors,
YPFEE emerged with a more comfortable debt profile, with manageable
debt maturities until 2026 when its $400 international bond comes
due.

The ratings also take into consideration YPFEE's asset base and
strong positioning in the power market in Argentina, with a 5%
share of the country's installed capacity, the successful
development of new assets in the renewable space in Argentina, with
a solid operating track record and production levels. The expected
strong cash generation underpinned by its long-term contractual
base (average remaining life of contracts of 14 years) also support
the ratings.

The ratings and stable outlook further factor in the strengthening
of cash flows following the completion early this year of most of
its investment plan, with projected CFO to debt well above 20% in
coming years due to the combination of improved cash flows and debt
reduction, coupled with a prudent dividend policy.

The ratings continue to be constrained by the exposure of the
company to Cammesa, the agency controlled by the Argentine
government (Government of Argentina, Ca, Stable) that manages the
wholesale electricity market and YPFEE's main off-taker. Given the
recent history of government intervention in the electricity market
and Cammesa's increased reliance on government transfers Moody's
believe other downside risks persist, including the potential risk
of unilateral change to the PPA contract's terms and conditions and
delays in cash settlements. In addition, YPFEE's debt is mostly
dollar denominated and while contractual revenues are also
dollar-denominated providing a natural hedge, Cammesa payments are
made in pesos at the official exchange rate, which exposes
bondholders to convertibility risks.

RATING OUTLOOK

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that YPFEE will
continue producing stable cash flows from its PPAs while
maintaining sound operations. The rating and outlook incorporate
Moody's view of leverage declining to the range of 2-3 times after
the company completes most of its expansion during the current
year.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Given the current constraining factors and the exposure to Cammesa,
an upgrade of the ratings will require an upgrade of the
sovereign.

In light of the outlook stabilization and Moody's expectation of
improved credit metrics, Moody's do not anticipate negative
pressure on the ratings unless there is an unexpected change to the
regulatory framework for the company's operations that results in
lower than expected revenues and cash flows. Quantitatively, a
ratio of cash from operations to debt (before working capital
changes) to debt below 15% could prompt a negative rating action.

PROFILE

The company was formed in August 2013 as a result of a spin-off
from YPF Sociedad Anonima (Caa3/sta), Argentina's fully integrated
oil & gas and largest energy company, majority owned by the
government. YPF decided to spin-off its generation assets with the
goal of converting YPFE in one of the main participants in the
power market. YPFEE is among the top 5 largest market players, with
a 5% share of the country's total installed capacity.

As part of the its growth strategy, in March 2018 YPFEE entered
into an agreement with GE by which one of GE's affiliates
subscribed a 24.9% of YPF E's stock, while the remaining 75.1%
belongs to YPF S.A.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Unregulated
Utilities and Unregulated Power Companies published in May 2017.


ZEIGANGEL VENTURES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Zeigangel Ventures LLC
        7175 West Post Road
        Las Vegas, NV 89113

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 17, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nevada

Case No.: 21-12539

Debtor's Counsel: Samuel A. Schwartz, Esq.
                  SCHWRATZ LAW, PLLC
                  601 East Bridger Avenue
                  Las Vegas, NV 89101
                  Tel: 702-385-5544
                  Fax: 702-385-2741
                  E-mail: saschwartz@nvfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Woodrow Lin, the managing member.

The Debtor stated it has no creditors holding unsecured claims.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/BA5THFI/ZEIGANGEL_VENTURES_LLC__nvbke-21-12539__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


[*] Hawaii Monthly Bankruptcies Increased for First Time in 2021
----------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Segal of Star Advertiser reports that Hawaii bankruptcies rose
for the first time this year as filings in April 2021 jumped 19.3%
even as the state continued to show encouraging signs of an
economic recovery.

The 136 cases were the most for any month since there were 140 in
July 2021, according to new data released by the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court, District of Hawaii.  There were only 114 cases in April
2020.

Through the first four months of 2021, bankruptcies are down 11.3%
to 454 from 512 in the year-ago period as they stay on pace to
decline for the second year in a row.

However, Honolulu bankruptcy attorney Greg Dunn expects cases to
increase in 2021 as people return to work with debt still hanging
over their heads.

"The rise in bankruptcies does not surprise me," said Dunn, who
said cases for his office alone are up 54% from a year ago. "The
number of people hiring me are motivated to do bankruptcies because
many of them are now being sued, and the creditors are more
aggressive in collecting on their delinquent claims as people are
beginning to go back to work. I don't foresee creditors slowing
down from their collection activities. So this could be a sign that
bankruptcies may be on the rise regardless of Hawaii's recovery."

State economist Eugene Tian pointed out, though, that the 136
bankruptcy cases are still relatively low compared with the 156
filed in April 2019. Last April 2021’s cases are also below the
more than 200 filings each April for the years 2009 to 2013 at the
end of the last recession and its aftermath, Tian said.

"With the COVID-19 pandemic lasting so long, it is expected that
bankruptcy filings will increase slowly," said Tian, chief
economist with the state Department of Business, Economic
Development and Tourism. "Economic recovery is a slow process and
may take a few years to recover to the pre-COVID level. We may see
more bankruptcy filings in the near future, but it will be far
below the level of the 2009 recession. This is because the economy
is getting better and about $7 billion in federal funds has been
allocated, or is in the process of being allocated, to Hawaii this
2021."

Still, Tian said the damage from the pandemic may be too much to
overcome for some people.

"People have been waiting for too long, and some businesses and
individuals have reached their limit and need to cease operation,"
he said.

Tian said Hawaii's economy, especially tourism, is performing
better than economists expected at the beginning of 2021.

"Visitor arrivals in April reached 62% of the April 2019 level, and
during the first 10 days of May, arrivals were at 66% of the May
2019 level," he said. “At the beginning of 2021, we expected that
visitor arrivals would reach 50% of the 2019 level by the end of
June 2021."

Tian noted that the Hawaii Commercial Rent Survey conducted in
March found that 92% of Hawaii businesses were open, with 6.3%
temporarily closed and 1.8% permanently closed.

"The 1.8% permanently closed businesses can be translated into
about 600 businesses that might be filing for bankruptcy, still a
low number compared with the last recession," he said.

In April 2021, Chapter 7 liquidation filings -- the most common
type of bankruptcy -- increased 22.1% to 94 from 77 in the
year-earlier period.

Chapter 13 filings, which allow individuals with regular sources of
income to set up plans to make installment payments to creditors
over three to five years, rose 13.5% to 42 from 37.

There were no Chapter 11 filings last month or in the year-earlier
period. Chapter 11 filings are primarily for business
reorganization.

Around the state, bankruptcies rose in the four major counties last
month. Honolulu County filings ticked up to 100 from 98, Hawaii
County filings more than doubled to 10 from four, Maui County
filings doubled to 20 from 10 and Kauai County filings tripled to
six from two.


[*] Restaurants, Bars Face Possible Shutout From New Relief Fund
----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill of Bloomberg Law reports that restaurants and bars that
filed bankruptcy in the wake of pandemic losses are facing a
possible shutout from a new $28.6 billion federal fund meant as a
lifeline for the industry.

The Small Business Administration, which administers the Restaurant
Revitalization Fund, says bankrupt companies can't apply unless
they have a court-approved bankruptcy plan.

That restriction is a major concern, as struggling restaurants may
not be able to get their bankruptcy plans approved before the money
runs out, insolvency professionals say.

"All companies that file an application are saying that they're
having financial difficulty; I don't see why it's different if
you're in or out of Chapter 11," said attorney Andrew Helman of
Dentons Bingham Greenebaum.

Fast casual restaurants Cosi and Even Stevens Sandwiches already
have tried to ditch their bankruptcy cases so they can apply
quickly.

"There are lots of restaurants of all shapes and sizes that will
take advantage of the fund because they were able to hold off from
filing bankruptcy," said Monique Almy, a partner at Crowell &
Moring LLP. "The bulk of filed RRF applications so far are from
companies that have been holding on" and not filing, she said.

The fledgling program likely won't have enough funds to buoy the
industry, said Jennifer Feldsher, a partner with Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP's restructuring division.

As of May 12, 2021 the SBA received more than 266,000 applications
seeking a total of $65 billion, well over the total amount
available, the agency said in a statement. The SBA already has
disbursed $2.7 billion to more than 21,000 restaurants, it said.

                       Bankruptcy Exclusion

The RRF, part of the $1.9 trillion Covid relief package passed by
Congress in March 2021, focuses "first on those who were left
behind by the other relief programs" like the Paycheck Protection
Program, President Joe Biden said in a May 6. 2021 speech touting
the program.

Tailored to small, family-run businesses, the fund doesn't require
them to "compete above their weight class" against larger companies
in order to access grant money, he said.

Unlike the PPP, restaurants can use the funds for non-payroll
expenses.

The first 21 days of the fund's availability also are reserved for
"priority" companies owned by women, veterans, or "those who have
been subjected to racial or ethnic prejudice or cultural bias" and
whose capital and credit opportunities have consequently been
impaired, according to the SBA.

It's unclear whether the $28.6 billion fund will even cover these
priority businesses, Feldsher said. Priority applicants alone have
filed more than 147,000 applications seeking $29 billion in grants,
according to the SBA.

Attorneys question the policy behind denying access to bankrupt
companies.

"I don't see any reason why a company reorganizing in Chapter 11
shouldn't be authorized to get the funds," Helman said.

"The SBA has a clear bias against bankrupt companies—who knows
why?" Almy asked.

The agency didn't respond to a request for comment.

The SBA's similar stance toward PPP eligibility spurred several
lawsuits to force the agency to accept bankrupt borrowers, with the
courts split on the issue.

About a month ago, April 2021, the agency quietly updated its
guidance to indicate that companies with confirmed plans could
apply, even if they hadn't yet emerged from bankruptcy. The SBA has
adopted the same policy with respect to the RRF.

In a 2020 court filing, the agency said bankrupt companies should
be excluded from the PPP because they carry an "'unacceptably high
risk' of both ‘unauthorized use of funds' and 'non-repayment of
unforgiven loans.'"

                               Changing Tactics

Some restaurants already in bankruptcy are trying to dismiss their
cases to qualify for the new funding source.

It's an unusual move after the time and money investment, which
"proves the benefit of the RRF program," Almy said.

Fast casual restaurant chain Cosi Inc. originally asked a Delaware
bankruptcy court to consider its reorganization plan on an
expedited basis so that it could seek up to $10 million from the
RRF.

But after the SBA said Cosi’s proposed interim plan approval
wouldn't cut it, Cosi changed course and asked the court to dismiss
its case. The court granted the request, with the SBA taking no
position on the move.

Covid has led to debtors "doing backflips" and behaving in ways
that otherwise wouldn't be considered rational or normal behavior,
Judge Brendan L. Shannon said. "But these are not rational or
normal times," he said.

In a separate case, an Arizona bankruptcy judge wouldn't allow Even
Stevens Sandwiches LLC to dismiss its Chapter 11 case so that it
can apply for PPP or RRF funding. Instead, the judge converted the
case to Chapter 7.

                       Better Alternative

Several features of the new fund make it an especially attractive
option for survival, when compared with discharging debt in
bankruptcy.

The fund "is really good for restaurants, which are incredibly
difficult to restructure, primarily because they lack hard
assets—just leases and good will," Helman said.

Concrete assets, like real estate, inventory, accounts receivable,
and equipment, are much easier to value than something like good
will.

The program also has more far-reaching benefits, Helman said. For
example, restaurants will be able to pay their landlords, which
must make their own debt payments, he said.

The RRF also is a better option for restaurants than the PPP, which
has been difficult for them to access, Feldsher said.

"A key tenet of the PPP is you only get loan forgiveness if you use
the funds to pay employees, but most restaurants were forced to
furlough or fire their employees," she said. So even if they
received the money, they'd lose the opportunity to have the loans
forgiven, she said.

"The RRF addresses these problems because the funds can be used for
mortgage payments, rent, debt service, utilities, supplies, and
retooling for outdoor dining or other adjustments," Feldsher said.

The SBA also directly handles the RRF distribution process, in
contrast to the PPP, which relies on banking institutions to
facilitate funding, Almy said. The agency is "making great progress
on approving loans and getting money out the door quickly," she
said.

That efficiency is a double-edged sword, narrowing the window for
bankrupt restaurants to confirm their plans and become eligible.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***