/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/210222.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, February 22, 2021, Vol. 25, No. 52

                            Headlines

1401 S. 22ND AVENUE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
335 LAKE AVENUE: Black Buying Aspen Property for $9.375 Million
511 GROUP: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Thru April 25
84 LUMBER: S&P Hikes Issuer Credit Rating to 'BB-', Outlook Stable
AAR CORP: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB' ICR

AJRANC INSURANCE: Has Cash Collateral Access Until March 22
ALEXANDER D. LEE: Selling 2010 Lexus LX 570 to CarMax for $30K
ALGY TRIMMINGS: Seeks to Hire Dannelly Monteleone as Accountant
ALL IN JETS: Auction of Substantially All Assets Set for March 4
ALLIED INJURY: Anguizolas Get 70% of Net Proceeds of Collections

ALPHABET HOLDING: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
AMERICAN CRYOSTEM: Incurs $46K Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
AMERICAN GREETINGS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
AMERICANN INC: Incurs $502,284 Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
AMERICANN INC: JV Partner Opens Retail Cannabis Dispensary

ANASTASIA PARENT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa3 CFR
APEX PARKS GROUP: Converts Case to Chapter 7 Liquidation
ART VAN FURNITURE: Heirs Buy Back Legal Rights to Name
ASP EMERALD: S&P Places 'B' Issuer Credit Rating on Watch Pos.
ASTROTECH CORP: Closes $9.25M Registered Direct Offering

ASTROTECH CORP: Incurs $1.6M Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
AVERY ASPHALT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
AVERY EQUIPMENT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
AVERY HOLDINGS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
AVIS BUDGET: Moody's Gives B3 Rating on $600MM Sr. Unsecured Notes

AVIS BUDGET: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'B+' ICR
AVIVAR HOSPITALITY: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 100% in Plan
B-LINE CARRIERS: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Until March 22
BRACHIUM INC: Gets OK to Hire Macdonald Fernandez as Legal Counsel
CALAIS REGIONAL HOSPITAL: Down East Buys Rival Out of Bankruptcy

CAMBER ENERGY: Inks Merger Agreement with Viking Energy
CAMP CROTEAU: Seeks Cash Collateral Access Thru July 15
CARECENTRIX HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
CARVER BANCORP: Incurs $1.3 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
CCRR PARENT: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable

CHRISTIAN CARE: Fitch Lowers Series 2014 and 2016 Bonds to 'D'
CICI'S HOLDINGS: Court Okays Entire $9-Million Bankruptcy Loan
CITIUS PHARMACEUTICALS: Closes $76.5M Registered Direct Offering
CLEARPOINT CHEMICALS: Creditors Committee Says Plan Inadequate
CLEARPOINT CHEMICALS: Rocky Mountain Says Disclosures Deficient

CLEARPOINT CHEMICALS: UMB Capital Opposes to Disclosure Statement
COMCAR INDUSTRIES: Has $1.62-Mil. Wind-Down Budget
COMMUNITY HEALTH: Board Elects Kevin Hammons as President, CFO
COMMUNITY INTERVENTION: $11.85M Sale of All Futures Assets Approved
COMMUNITY INTERVENTION: To Submit Proposed Order on Sale of Assets

COMSTOCK RESOURCES: Fitch Rates Eight-Year Unsecured Notes 'B+'
COMSTOCK RESOURCES: S&P Assigns 'B' Rating on New Sr. Unsec. Debt
CONTINENTAL COIFFURES: Amended Small Business Plan Due March 19
CORNUS MONTESSORI: Seeks to Hire RoganMillerZimmerman as Counsel
COTY INC: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa1 CFR

CRED INC: Former CFO Fights Court Ruling to Keep Chapter 11 Alive
CRED INC: Quinn Emanuel Agrees to Return Most of $350,000 Fees
D.W. TRIM: May Use Cash Collateral Use Thru March 30
DANNY R BARTEL: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Feb. 25
DELL TECHNOLOGIES: Fitch Assigns 'BB+' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable

DESTILERIA NACIONAL: Court Rejects Debtor's Plan & Disclosures
DIVERSITECH HOLDINGS: Moody's Rates $487MM First Lien Loan 'B2'
DOLE FOOD: S&P Places 'B' ICR on Watch Pos. on Merger Announcement
DRC III: Seeks Approval to Hire Baird Holm as Special Counsel
EASTERDAY RANCHES: Seeks to Hire Bush Kornfeld as Local Counsel

EASTERDAY RANCHES: Seeks to Hire Davis Wright as Special Counsel
EASTERDAY RANCHES: Seeks to Hire Pachulski Stang as Legal Counsel
ECOARK HOLDINGS: Julia Olguin Appointed White River CEO
EDGEWELL PERSONAL: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Ba3 CFR
ELLINGTON 2021-1: S&P Assigns Prelim B (sf) Rating on B-2 Certs

ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B1 CFR
ESPORTS USA: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 100% in Plan
EVANGEL INTERNATIONAL: Wins Court Approval of Reorganization Plan
EXACTUS INC: 3i Agrees to Settle Pending Litigation
FARM-RITE INC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Until March 16

FENCEPOST PRODUCTIONS: March 24 Amended Disclosure Hearing Set
FF FUND: April 26 & 27 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
FIELDWOOD ENERGY: Will Pay $2 Mil. to Settle Oil Spill Allegations
FIREBALL REALTY: Sargent Buying Manchester Property for $720K
FLEX ACQUISITION: S&P Assigns 'B' Rating on New $1.275BB Term Loan

FLOYD SQUIRES: Liquidating Agent Files Notice on Property Sale
FLOYD SQUIRES: Liquidating Agent Selling Eureka Property for $188K
FREEMAN HOLDINGS: $500K Sale of Springdale Property to Arvest OK'd
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC: Fitch Alters Outlook on BB+ IDR to Positive
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS: Seeks Oct. 14 Plan Exclusivity Extension

GALAXY NEXT: Incurs $7.8 Million Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
GALLERIA OF ST. MATTHEWS: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
GB SCIENCES: Incurs $594K Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
GLENROY COACHELLA: Lender Asks Court to Appoint Chapter 11 Trustee
GRUPO AEROMEXICO: Shareholders May Get "Very Little or No" Value

GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Considers Pre-Packaged Chapter 11 to Cut Debt
GULFPORT ENERGY: Committee Wants Note Claims in Separate Class
GULFPORT ENERGY: UCC Says Disclosures Have Glaring Deficiencies
HAJJAR BUSINESS: Can Use Cash Collateral Until May 25
HARGRAY HOLDINGS: S&P Places 'B+' ICR on CreditWach Positive

HARLEY-DAVIDSON: Egan-Jones Lowers Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB
HCA HEALTHCARE: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB-
HERBALIFE NUTRITION: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Ba3 CFR
HILLMAN COS: S&P Assigns Prelim 'B+' Rating on $1.035BB Term Loans
HILLMAN SOLUTIONS: Fitch Assigns Expected 'BB-(EXP)' LongTerm IDR

HOFFMASTER GROUP: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa1 CFR
HORIZON THERAPEUTICS: Moody's Rates New Sr. Term Loan 'Ba1(LGD3)'
HORIZON THERAPEUTICS: S&P Assigns Prelim BB+ Rating on Sec. Loan
IBIO INC: Names Robert Lutz as Chief Financial and Business Officer
IN-SHAPE HOLDINGS: Court Approves Bankruptcy Sale to Lenders

INFINITE BIDCO: Moody's Assigns First Time B3 Corp. Family Rating
INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE: Adequate Protection Payments to Begin Feb. 23
IOWA FERTILIZER: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Rating on Senior Secured Bonds
IOWA FINANCE: Fitch Hikes Rating on Disaster Area Bonds to 'B+'
IQVIA INC: S&P Rates New Euro-Denominated Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB'

ISAGENIX INTERNATIONAL: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa2 CFR
JP INTERMEDIATE: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa3 CFR
KNOTEL INC: Digiatech Can File Reply to Bid Procedures for Assets
KNOTEL INC: Extends Sale Timeline to Pacify Creditors
KNOW LABS: Incurs $5.3 Million Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31

KNOWLTON DEVELOPMENT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
LADAN INC: Files Projections Ahead of March 9 Hearing
LAGO RESORT: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC-', Outlook Negative
LAX IN-FLITE: Seeks to Hire G&B Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
LBLA VENTURES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

LEWISBERRY PARTNERS: Selling 3 Lewisberry Properties for $792K
LIGHTHOUSE RESOURCES: MBTL Selling Equipment to NWA for $75K
LISTO WAY GROUP: Seeks Approval to Hire Bankruptcy Attorneys
M/I HOMES: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB+
M/I HOMES: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB-' on Increased Profits

MALLINCKRODT PLC: Asks Judge to OK $114 Million Loan Prepayment
MALLINCKRODT PLC: Says Rival Unlawfully Recruited Its Workers
MARY CECILIA RIDGEWAY: Flemisters Buying Corona Property for $838K
MATTHEW O'REILLY: Foxtrot Burger Owner in Chapter 7
MBM SAND: March 23 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set

MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES: Seeks Aug. 31 Plan Confirmation Extension
MEDICAL SIMULATION: Gets OK to Hire SL Biggs as Accountant
MERITAGE HOMES: S&P Ups ICR to 'BB+' on Strong 2020 Performance
MIDTOWN CAMPUS: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until May 3
MKJC AUTO: Auction of Substantially All Assets Set for March 26

MKJC AUTO: World Imports Buying Assets for $2M, Subject to Overbid
MOHEGAN TRIBAL GAMING: S&P Raises 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
MOREAUX TRANSPORTATION: Seeks Approval to Hire Financial Advisor
MTE HOLDINGS: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity Until March 22
NANCY LOUISE HORTON: Winchester Property Sale Voluntarily Dismissed

NAVIENT SOLUTIONS: Asks Court to Dismiss 'Unsupported' Ch.11 Filing
NEOPHARMA INC: Trustee Hires Polsinelli PC as Legal Counsel
NEOPHARMA INC: Trustee Hires Resurgence Financial as Accountant
NEUROCARE CENTER: Cash Collateral Use Until Mar. 17 OK'd
NEWELL BRANDS: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB+' LTR

NORTHERN HOLDINGS: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until June 25
NPC INT'L: Asks Court to Extend Plan Exclusivity Until June 26
ONE AVIATION: Committee Bid for Chapter 7 Approved
ORANGE COUNTY BAIL: Global Says Projected Income Illusory
ORANGE COUNTY BAIL: Subchapter V Trustee Awaits Plan Changes

P&L DEVELOPMENT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
PALM BEACH: Creditors to Get Paid from Liquidation of Receivables
PDC BEAUTY: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
PERFORMANCE FOOD: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'B+' ICR

PETCO HEALTH: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR on Proposed Refinancing
PH BEAUTY III: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa1 CFR
PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY: S&P Lowers Long-Term ICR to 'CCC (sf)'
PHUNWARE INC: Closes Offering of $24.7-Mil. Worth of Common Stock
POINCIANA MANAGEMENT: Seeks Feb. 28 Plan Filing Extension

PORTOFINO TOWERS: Wins April 25 Plan Exclusivity Extension
POTENTIAL DYNAMIX: Amazon Limited Liability Clause Unenforceable
PRESTIGE BRANDS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B1 CFR
PSW VENTURE: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
REGIONAL PAVEMENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

RENAISSANCE HOLDING: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR on Nearpod Acquisition
RENAISSANCE HOLDING: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
RENTPATH HOLDINGS: Signs Deal to Sell to Redfin for $608 Million
REVLON CONSUMER: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa3 CFR
REXNORD LLC: S&P Places 'BB' ICR on Watch Neg. on Planned Spin-Off

REYNOLDS CONSUMER: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Ba1 CFR
ROBERT F. TAMBONE: Hearing on $31K Sale of Boat Set for March 23
ROCKVILLE TAG: Seeks to Hire Richard B. Rosenblatt as Legal Counsel
RODAN & FIELDS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa2 CFR
RTECH FABRICATIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

RUBY TUESDAY: Plan Approved After Deal With Landlords
S&S HOLDINGS: Moody's Assigns First Time B3 Corp. Family Rating
S&S HOLDINGS: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
SANUWAVE HEALTH: Accounting Error Found in Form 10-Q Report
SHREE MADHAV: Selling Laundry Business to Pennington for $325K

SIMMONS FOODS: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Rates New $750M Notes B3
SIMMONS FOODS: S&P Rates Proposed $750MM Second-Lien Notes 'B'
SINALOENCE FOOD: Seeks to Hire Michael Jay Berger as Counsel
SOUND HOUSING: Case Summary & 18 Unsecured Creditors
SOUTHLAND ROYALTY: $251.7M Sale to Wamsutter to Fund Plan

SPANISH HEIGHTS: Seeks to Hire Maier Gutierrez as Special Counsel
SPECTRUM BRANDS: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on $400MM Unsecured Notes
SPECTRUM BRANDS: S&P Rates New $350MM Senior Sr. Term Loan 'BB-'
SUPERIOR PLUS: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR, Outlook Stable
TEEKAY CORP: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B+' ICR

THG PROPERTIES: Owners to Contribute $100,000 to Plan
TIDEWATER ESTATES: Seeks to Hire Re/Max as Real Estate Broker
TOPP'S MECHANICAL: Gets OK to Hire Houghton Bradford as Counsel
TOPPS COMPANY: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
TRANSPINE INC: Has Until Feb. 25 to File Amended Plan & Disclosures

TRI-STATE PAIN: March 25 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
TURNING POINT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
U.S.A. DAWGS: Mojave Substitution as Successor-In-Interest OK
UBER TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B', Outlook Stable
US CONSTRUCTION: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors

USA COMPRESSION: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B1 CFR
UTS UNDERGROUND: Has Until March 19 to File Reorganization Plan
VAMCO SHEET: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
VECTOR GROUP: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
VERSANT HEALTH: Moody's Hikes CFR From B3 Amid MetLife Acquisition

VICTORY CAPITAL: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR, Alters Outlook to Positive
VILLAS OF WINDMILL: Objectors Say Trustee's Disclosures Ambiguous
VISTA OUTDOOR: Moody's Hikes New 8-Yr. Unsecured Notes to B2
VISTA OUTDOOR: S&P Rates New $350MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'B+'
VISTA OUTDOOR: S&P Stays 'B+' Rating on Senior Unsecured Notes

VMWARE INC: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR & Alters Outlook to Stable
VOYAGER AVIATION: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa1, Put on Further Review
VOYAGER AVIATION: S&P Cuts ICR to 'CCC-' on Restructuring Plans
WALKER RADIO: Gets OK to Hire Media Services Group as Broker
WASHINGTON MUTUAL: Griffin Objection Overrule Affirmed by 3rd Cir.

WASHINGTON PRIME: Fitch Lowers LongTerm IDR to 'C'
WELDED CONSTRUCTION: Court Orders Production of 196 Documents
WINDSTREAM HOLDINGS: Too Late to Revisit Vendor Pay, Court Rules
WOODMONT 2017-2: S&P Assigns Prelim BB(sf) Rating on Cl. E-R Notes
WORLD ACCEPTANCE: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B', Outlook Stable

YC ATLANTA: Seeks to Hire GGG Partners as Financial Advisor
YC ATLANTA: Seeks to Hire Stone & Baxter as Legal Counsel
YOUFIT HEALTH CLUBS: New CEO Vahaly Takes Helm
ZAYO GROUP: S&P Affirms 'B' First-Lien Debt Rating on Loan Add-On
ZEST ACQUISITION: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Outlook Negative

ZOHAR FUNDS: Court OKs $1.1M Sale of Michigan Parcel
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from February 15 to 19, 2021

                            *********

1401 S. 22ND AVENUE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 1401 S. 22nd Avenue, LLC
        7770 Ventura Street
        Colorado Springs, CO 80951

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 21-10802

Debtor's Counsel: David J. Warner, Esq.
                  WADSWORTH GARBER WARNER CONRARDY, P.C.
                  2580 West Main Street
                  Suite 200
                  Littleton, CO 80120
                  Tel: 303-296-1999
                  E-mail: dwarner@wgwc-law.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Aaron Avery, manager.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/HU2DE4Y/1401_S_22nd_Avenue_LLC__cobke-21-10802__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


335 LAKE AVENUE: Black Buying Aspen Property for $9.375 Million
---------------------------------------------------------------
335 Lake Avenue, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado to authorize the sale of the real estate
located at 335 Lake Avenue, in Aspen, Colorado, to Steven Black for
$9.375 million.

Pre-petition, on Feb. 12, 2016, the Debtor and Lake Avenue Land,
LLC entered into an Agreement to Buy and Sell Real Estate, and
subsequently amended the Purchase Agreement and/or the Lease on
March 31, 2016, April 28, 2016, May 5, 2016, May 5, 2016, May 7,
2016, March 25, 2019, and Dec. 31, 2019.  The Seventh Amendment,
entered into on Dec. 31, 2019, assigned the Purchase Agreement from
Lake Avenue Land, LLC to Mr. Black, individually.  The Purchase
Agreement is to sell the Property.

On May 15, 2020, Mr. Black filed Adversary Proceeding No.
20-1145-JGR seeking declaratory judgment and specific performance.
The Debtor filed its Answer to Mr. Black's Adversary Complaint on
July 16, 2020, and on Oct. 30, 2020, filed a Motion to Amend the
Answer and Add a Counterclaim.

On Sept. 25, 2020, the Debtor filed its Motion to Assume An
Unexpired Lease and Executory Contract to assume the Lease and
Purchase Agreement.  Mr. Black filed his Response In Opposition to
Motion to Assume Unexpired Lease and Executory Contract on Oct. 9,
2020.

The Debtor's Motion to Assume An Unexpired Lease and Executory
Contract and Mr. Black objection thereto is a contested matter
currently scheduled for an evidentiary hearing on March 3 and 4,
2021.

The Debtor and Mr. Black have entered into a Settlement Agreement
which is subject to Court approval of both the Debtor's Motion to
Approve Settlement Between the Debtor-In-Possession and Steven
Black and the 363 Motion.  Under the Settlement Agreement, the
Debtor and Mr. Black agree that (1) the Debtor would file the
Motion pursuant to Section 363 to sell the subject property to Mr.
Black for the total purchase price of $9.375 million, including Mr.
Black's previous deposit of $925,000, and (2) following the Closing
on the subject property Mr. Black would dismiss with prejudice
Adversary Proceeding No. 20-1145-JGR.

The U.S. Bank National Association (successor to Bank of America,
N.A., successor by merger to LaSalle Bank N.A.), as Trustee, on
behalf of the holders of the Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust
2007-5 Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-5 filed
Proof of Claim 1-1 in the amount of $7,305,478.05, representing a
disputed lien against the property in the principal amount of
$5,080,497.18.  

The Debtor asks Court approval to sell the Property to Mr. Black,
under the terms of Settlement Agreement, free and clear of any
interest in the Property, given that the sale price is greater than
the U.S. Bank's lien against the Property, with U.S. Bank's lien
attaching to the proceeds of the sale.

The Debtor further asks Court approval, in full compliance with
Section 345, to place all net proceeds from the sale into an
interest-bearing account for the benefit of U.S. Bank, which may
not be drawn upon without further order of the Court, except the
Debtor will be permitted to withdraw all interest and capital gains
earned on the account.

The Agreement between the Debtor and Mr. Black however, is not
conditioned on any further orders of the Court affecting the
escrowing of funds or the Debtor's ability, if granted, to withdraw
any accrued interest and capital gains.   The account balance of
the proceeds will be distributed pursuant to a court order, upon
entry of a final, non-appealable order resolving the disputes
between the Debtor and U.S. Bank.

                      About 335 Lake Avenue

335 Lake Avenue, LLC is a single asset real estate (as defined in
11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

On April 1, 2020, 335 Lake Avenue filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo.
Case No. 20-12378).  James K. Daggs, Debtor's manager, signed the
petition.  At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed total
assets
of $10 million to $50 million.  Judge Joseph G. Rosania Jr.
oversees the case.  

Debtor has tapped Weinman & Associates, P.C. as its bankruptcy
counsel and Allen Vellone Wolf Helfrich & Factor, P.C. and Klein
Cote Edwards Citron, LLC as its special counsel.



511 GROUP: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Thru April 25
-------------------------------------------------------
At the behest of the Debtor 511 Group LLC, Judge A. Jay Cristol of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
extended the period in which the Debtor may file and solicit
acceptances of a chapter 11 plan through and including April 25,
2021, and June 24, 2021, respectively.

The Debtor's case was filed before the Court on February 3, 2021,
at 2:00 P.M, and the Court considered the arguments of counsel and
the U.S. Trustee, and the Debtor now filed the delinquent Monthly
Operating Reports as a condition of the entry of this Order.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3sa9Wsl at no extra charge.

                              About 511 Group LLC

511 Group LLC, a Miami Beach, Fla.-based limited liability company,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-21098) on October 12, 2020. In its petition,
the Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities to be between
$100,001 and $500,000.

Judge A. Jay Cristol presides over the case. Joel M. Aresty P.A. is
the Debtor's legal counsel.


84 LUMBER: S&P Hikes Issuer Credit Rating to 'BB-', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its ratings on 84 Lumber Co. to 'BB-'
from 'B+'. At the same time, S&P assigned its 'BB-' rating on the
company's proposed $607 million term loan B-1 due 2026. The
recovery rating on the term loan is '3', reflecting its expectation
for meaningful recovery (50%-70% range; rounded estimate: 60%) in a
payment default.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our view that 84 Lumber will
continue to benefit from U.S. residential construction growth such
that leverage will remain below 3x with EBITDA margins above 5%
over the next 12 months, even if lumber prices moderate.

"We expect increased demand for residential construction in 2021,
which is a key end market for 84 Lumber.  84 Lumber generates about
75%-80% of its revenues from residential construction, which is
benefiting from significant growth, especially for single-family
dwellings. In 2020, we expect revenues to grow 20%-25% bolstered by
higher housing starts and commodity price inflation. S&P Global
Ratings forecasts residential construction demand will increase
another 5.5% in 2021, supported by higher millennial household
formation and low-interest rates." This, along with additional
store openings in high-growth areas, should result in 5%-6% revenue
growth for 84 Lumber in 2021.

Debt leverage likely to remain below 3x over the next 12 months,
even if lumber prices moderate. S&P said, "We expect 84 Lumber's
leverage to remain below 3x over the next 12 months, primarily due
to earnings growth over debt reduction. We expect the company's
earnings to benefit from anticipated housing starts of 1.36 million
in 2021 and a favorable product mix due to its continued focus on
selling more value-added products such as installations that only
use its products, as well as custom orders that garner higher
margins. 84 Lumber has also worked to streamline expenses through
cost-management initiatives and enhanced pricing. As a result of
these initiatives as well as volume growth, we expect earnings grew
about 40%-42% in 2020 and expect another 8%-9% growth in 2021 even
if lumber prices decline. Lumber prices spiked significantly in
2020 because of rising demand from higher residential construction,
and increased repair and remodel spending from homeowners coupled
with tighter supply due to COVID-related shutdowns, as well has
higher import taxes on Canadian lumber. Of 84 Lumber's 14.2%
revenue growth in the first nine months of 2020, 9.5% of the
increase was due to higher commodity prices, especially for lumber.
However, as supply-side issues are resolved we would expect EBITDA
margins to improve even as revenues fall, offsetting some of the
effect on earnings."

S&P said, "We expect 84 Lumber to generate positive free operating
cash flow (FOCF) to debt over the next 12 months, and direct the
majority of FOCF toward distributions.  With low maintenance
capital expenditures of less than 1% of annual sales coupled with
increasing earnings, 84 Lumber consistently generates positive
FOCF. The company is in the process of a growth phase with plans to
add six to 10 stores annually, resulting in capital spending of $60
million-$70 million in 2021. However, we forecast 84 Lumber will
continue to generate positive free cash flow to debt of above 10%
in 2021. 84 Lumber makes distributions to its partners guided by
various leverage hurdles. Given lower leverage expectations over
the forecast, we anticipate higher distributions with about 40%-45%
of it for tax purposes. Despite the higher expected distributions,
we expect the company to maintain relatively prudent financial
policies targeting leverage below 3x.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that 84 Lumber will continue
to benefit from U.S. residential construction growth such that
leverage will remain below 3x with EBITDA margins above 5% over the
next 12 months.

"We could lower our ratings on 84 Lumber if the surge in
residential construction stalls compared to our expectations of
5.5% growth or the company's own growth initiatives result in
higher expenses or require a higher level of investment than we
anticipate. We could also lower the rating if higher commodity
prices depressed margins or increased working capital requirements
reducing FOCF." Specifically, these scenarios would be consistent
with the following:

-- An expectation of debt to EBITDA above 3x; or

-- EBITDA margins below 5%.

S&P views an upgrade as unlikely over the next 12 months given the
inherent cyclicality and earnings volatility in 84 Lumber's end
markets. However, it could raise its ratings on 84 Lumber over the
next 12 months if the company reduced earnings volatility while
maintaining debt to EBITDA below 2x and EBITDA margins improved
toward the 8% area, which is more in line with rated peers. This
could occur if:

-- The company reduced earnings volatility either by expanding
into more stable end markets such as repair and remodel or by
expanding its product offering into significantly higher-margin
products.

-- 84 Lumber directed its free cash flows toward debt reduction.


AAR CORP: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB' ICR
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on AAR Corp. to stable from
negative and affirmed its 'BB' issuer credit rating.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the
company's credit metrics will remain appropriate for the current
rating supported by its improved margins and good free cash flow
generation.

"AAR's credit metrics will likely improve and exceed our previously
forecast levels in fiscal year 2021 (ending May 31, 2021).  While
the demand for the company's maintenance, repair, and overhaul
(MRO) services and spare parts (about 63% of 2020 revenue) declined
significantly over the last year due to the effects of the pandemic
on global air travel, it hasn't fallen by as much as we previously
expected. In addition, the demand for AAR's defense work remains
stable. We expect the company's adjusted EBITDA margins to recover
to the 8%-9% range in 2021, from 6.1% in fiscal 2020, due to
management's cost-cutting actions, lower restructuring charges, and
benefits from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
(CARES) Act. We now expect funds from operations (FFO) to debt of
about 30%, debt to EBITDA of 2.4x-2.8x, and free operating cash
flow (FOCF) to debt in the mid-20% area in 2021. This compares with
our previous expectations for FFO to debt of less than 20%, debt to
EBITDA exceeding 5x, and FOCF to debt of 15%-20%."

While there is still some uncertainty around the recovery in the
demand for commercial aircraft parts and MRO services, the stable
outlook on AAR reflects that its credit metrics have improved and
now have some cushion at the current rating. Specifically, S&P
expects it to have FFO to debt of about 30%, debt to EBITDA of
2.4x-2.8x, and FOCF to debt in the mid-20% area in fiscal year
2021.

S&P could lower its rating on AAR in the next 12 months if its debt
to EBITDA remains above 4x and its FFO to debt falls below 20% and
it expects them to remain at these levels in fiscal year 2022. This
could occur if:

-- The volume of commercial air travel does not improve due to the
coronavirus pandemic;

-- The company's cash flow weakens materially; or

-- It pursues a more aggressive financial policy.

Although unlikely in the next 12 months, S&P could raise its rating
on AAR if its FFO to debt improves above 35% and its FOCF to debt
exceeds 20% and S&P expects its metrics to remain at these levels.
This would likely occur due to:

-- A quicker-than-expected recovery in its demand;

-- Continued strong free cash flow generation; and

-- The company's financial policy remains fairly conservative.


AJRANC INSURANCE: Has Cash Collateral Access Until March 22
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Caryl E. Delano of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida, Tampa Division, authorized AJRANC Insurance
Agency, Inc. and its affiliated Debtor R.A. Borruso, Inc. to use
cash collateral on an interim basis, pending further hearing to be
conducted by the Court on March 22, 2021 at 3 p.m.

Judge Delano authorized the Debtors to use Cash Collateral
including, without limitation, cash, deposit accounts, accounts
receivable, and proceeds from their business operations in
accordance with the approved budget, as long as the aggregate of
all expenses for each week do not exceed the amount in the Budget
by more than ten percent for any such week on a cumulative basis.
The Debtors, however, were not authorized to pay a car allowance to
Anthony Borruso.

"As adequate protection with respect to the Lenders' interests in
the Cash Collateral, the Lenders are granted a replacement lien in
and upon all of the categories and types of collateral in which
they held a security interest and lien as of the Petition Date to
the same extent, validity and priority that they held as of the
Petition Date," Judge Delano held.

The Debtors were directed to maintain insurance coverage for the
Collateral in accordance with the obligations under the loan and
security documents.

                     About AJRANC Insurance Agency

AJRANC Insurance Agency, Inc., based in Lutz, Fla., filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 20-06493) on August 27,
2020.  In the petition signed by Anthony L. Borruso, president, the
Debtor disclosed $1,869,283 in assets and $1,920,494 in
liabilities.  STICHTER RIEDEL BLAIN & POSTLER, P.A., serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.



ALEXANDER D. LEE: Selling 2010 Lexus LX 570 to CarMax for $30K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander Dong Lee asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to authorize the sale of his 2010 Lexus LX 570,
a four-door sport utility vehicle, VIN JTJHY7AX3A4049958, to CarMax
for $30,000, subject to better and higher offers.

The Debtor owns the Vehicle, which he has scheduled as having a
value of $24,530.  It is located in Breckenridge, Colorado, where
it was used by the Debtor as part of his ownership of three
condominiums which are being sold.   

The Debtor asks approval and authorization from the Court to sell
the Vehicle to the Buyer for $30,000.  He asks approval to pay any
necessary and customary closing costs in connection with the sale.


The proposed sale prices remain subject to better and higher offers
and Court approval.

CarMax is a third party, unrelated entity. All negotiations were at
arms'-length.

The Vehicle is unencumbered.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the set forth in the Motion,
the Debtor in the sound exercise of his business judgment has
concluded that consummation of the sale of the Vehicle to CarMax
will best maximize the value of the estate for the benefit of
creditors.  The Vehicle is no longer used or useful to him.  He
respectfully asserts that ample business justification exists for
the sale.

A copy of the Offer is available at https://tinyurl.com/zcwslx4t
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Alexander Dong Lee sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 20-21594) on Oct. 23, 2020.  The Debtor tapped Robert
Furr, Esq., as counsel.



ALGY TRIMMINGS: Seeks to Hire Dannelly Monteleone as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Algy Trimmings Co., Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to hire Dannelly
Monteleone & Associates, LLC as its accountant.

The firm's services include the preparation of tax returns and
accounting advice on tax-related issues.

The firm will charge a flat fee of 3,000 for its services or $200
per hour for accountants and $100 per hour for staff, whichever is
lower.

Dannelly Monteleone is a "disinterested person" within the meaning
of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
papers filed  by the firm.

The firm can be reached through:

     Ray Monteleone, CPA
     Dannelly Monteleone & Associates, LLC
     612 se 5 TH Avenue #6
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Phone: +1 954-973-0040
     Fax: (954) 252-2370

                   About Algy Trimmings Co. Inc.

Algy Trimmings Co., Inc. -- https://www.algyteam.com --
manufactures guard uniforms, winter guard uniforms, dance team
uniforms, drill team uniforms, majorette, cheer, campwear and
warm-ups.

Algy Trimmings filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
20-23791) on Dec. 18, 2020.  Algy Trimmings President Susan Gordon
signed the petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
disclosed $382,483 in assets and $2,494,623 in liabilities.  

The Debtor tapped Gamberg & Abrams as its legal counsel and
Dannelly Monteleone & Associates, LLC as its accountant.


ALL IN JETS: Auction of Substantially All Assets Set for March 4
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael E. Wiles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York authorized the bid procedures
proposed by All In Jets, LLC, doing business as Jet Ready, relating
to the sale of substantially all assets outside the ordinary course
of business, to Aviate Jet Group, LLC for $600,000, cash, subject
to higher and better offers.

Hearings on the Motion were held on Jan. 27, 2021, Feb. 4, 2021,
and Feb. 12, 2021.

The following dates and deadlines will constitute the Schedule in
the Case:

     a. Overbid Deadline: March 2, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. (EST)

     b. Notification of Qualified Bidders: March 3, 2021, at 5:00
p.m. (EST)

     c. Auction: March 4, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (EST) is the date
when the Debtor will conduct an auction via Zoom with the Stalking
Horse Bidder and any Qualified Bidders.  On March 8, 2021 at 12:00
Noon, the Debtor will file with the Court a Notice of Winning Bid.
It will file a report with the Court certifying the results of the
auction on March 8, 2021 and, if any bidder was not qualified, the
reasons for the non-qualification.  Further, the Debtor will advise
all non-qualified bidders that each may appear and be heard at the
Sale Hearing.

     d. Deadline to Object to Sale: March 11, 2021, at 12:00 p.m.
(EST)

     e.  Sale Hearing: March 17, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (EST).  The
Debtor at the Sale Hearing will also ask a waiver of the Rule
6004(h) stay.

The Bid Protections are approved on the terms set forth in the Sale
and Bidding Procedures as an exercise of their business judgment,
without further notice to parties in interest, or action or order
by the Court.

Notwithstanding the requirements of section 363(k) of the
Bankruptcy Code, no credit bidding will be permitted as part of the
Sale and Bidding Procedures.  

The Sale Notice is approved and will be served on all creditors,
parties in interest and published in the appropriate trade
journals, including without limitation Aviation International News
("AIN") with a request that it be included in the "AIN Alerts," at
least 10 days before the Bid Deadline.  The Debtor will file an
affidavit describing the method of such publication prior to the
Sale Hearing.

Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), the terms and conditions
of the Order are immediately effective and enforceable upon its
entry.  

The salient terms of the bid procedures:

     a. Deposit: $50,000

     b. Bid Increments: 10,000

The sale will include a transfer free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests and encumbrances, including those alleged
interests asserted by Caliber Jet Charter, LLC and all proceeds of
sale will be held by the Debtor or as directed by the Court until a
further order approving disposition of proceeds is entered.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/21zt3y1y from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                         About All In Jets

All In Jets, LLC -- https://www.flyjetready.com/ -- is a private
jet charter operator and aircraft management company offering
flights worldwide with a floating charter fleet of heavy to
midsize jets including Gulfstream GIVSPs, Gulfstream GIVs,
Challenger 601s and Hawker 800 models.

All In Jets, LLC d/b/a Jet Ready, based in New York, NY, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. N.Y. Case No. 20-11831) on Aug.
9,
2020.  In the petition signed by Seth Bernstein, member, the
Debtor
was estimated to have $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $1
million to $10 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Michael E. Wiles
presides over the case.  CIARDI CIARDI & ASTIN, serves as
bankruptcy counsel.



ALLIED INJURY: Anguizolas Get 70% of Net Proceeds of Collections
----------------------------------------------------------------
David M. Goodrich, the duly appointed and acting Chapter 11
trustee, for debtor Allied Injury Management, Inc., filed a Chapter
11 Plan of Liquidation and an explanatory Disclosure Statement.

The Plan is a liquidation plan that contemplates, among other
things, that the Trustee will distribute the funds on hand to
creditors and interest holders in accordance with the priorities
set forth in the Bankruptcy Code.  The Plan also provides for the
transfer of the remaining assets of the Debtor to a Liquidating
Trust, over which the Trustee will become the Liquidating Trustee.
After the assets are transferred to the Liquidating Trust, the
Liquidating Trustee will distribute the funds realized by the
Liquidating Trust in accordance with the Plan.

The Plan was the product of a settlement between the Trustee, the
Debtor, the Debtor's largest unsecured creditor, and its only
secured creditor.  The Effective Date of the Plan will be the date
that is three weeks after entry of the Confirmation Order, provided
there has been no order staying the effectiveness of the
Confirmation Order.

Allied's principal assets are its MSA's and receivables owed to it
by certain client medical providers.  Some of Allied's receivables
are disputed. The Debtor previously represented that the face value
of the medical receivables that Allied was collecting under its
various MSA's exceeded $100 million, of which Allied stands to earn
about 40% upon collection. The current face value of the Medical
Receivables is currently approximately $36 million, but as the
efforts to collect the receivables over the past few years has
proven, the actual value of these receivables is unknown but
clearly significantly less than the face value.

On or about August 24, 2020, the Trustee, the Anguizola Entities,
Larson, and Cambridge participated in a mediation, with David Guess
serving as the mediator. Pursuant to that mediation, a settlement
was reached that resolved among other things, all adversary
proceedings and contested matters between Anguizola, the Estate,
and Cambridge. The resolution provides the framework for the Plan.


Class 1 consists of the claim of Cambridge Medical Funding Group
II, LLC ("CMFG"). Claimant will receive 60% of proceeds of
collections of OSM and OS Therapy until paid in full, with 40%
being retained by the Liquidating Trust to cover costs associated
with collecting receivables and administering the Liquidating
Trust. In the event that CMFG is paid $725,000 by no later than
March 15, 2021, the claim shall be deemed paid in full and CMFG.
The Liquidating Trustee shall pay CMFG as funds become available
from the collection of the OSM and OS Therapy receivables, but
shall not be required to make a distribution more often than every
90 days, or if there is less than $5,000 to distribute to CMFG.

Class 2 consists of All General Unsecured Creditors with Allowed
Claims except, Dr. Larson, or any of his Affiliates, Dr. Anguizola,
OSM, OS Therapy, or NorCal.  Class 2 Creditors shall receive a
Pro-Rata distribution of the Net Proceeds of Collections from the
Liquidating Trust with respect to OSM and OST collections.  Class 2
shall receive a Pro-Rata distribution of the Net Proceeds of
Collections from the Liquidating Trust with respect to collections
from NorCal and other non-Anguizola related providers.  Payments
shall be made by the Liquidating Trust not more often than every 90
days, and only to the extent the Liquidating Trust has at least
$10,000 to distribute. Payments will continue until creditors in
this Class are paid in full, without interest.

Class 3 consists of the Allowed General Unsecured Claims of
Anguizola, OSM, OS Therapy, and NorCal (Anguizola Entities).  The
Anguizola Entities will receive 70% of the Net Proceeds of
Collections with respect to OSM and OST collections.  The Anguizola
Entities will receive 70% of the Net Proceeds of Collections.
Payments shall be made by the Liquidating Trust not more often than
every 90 days, and only to the extent the Liquidating Trust has at
least $10,000 to distribute. Payments shall continue until
creditors in this Class are paid in full, without interest.

Class 4 Interest Holder Dr. John Larson shall retain his ownership
Interest in the Debtor.  Larson will receive 30% of the Net
Proceeds of Collections with respect to OSM and OST collections.
Larson will receive 30% of the Net Proceeds of Collections with
respect to NorCal Collections. Larson will receive 100% of the Net
Proceeds of Collections with respect to all collections of
non-Anguizola related providers. Payments shall be made by the
Liquidating Trust not more often than every 90 days, and only to
the extent the Liquidating Trust has at least $10,000 to
distribute. Payments shall continue until creditors in this Class
are paid in full, without interest. Neither Larson nor any of his
affiliates will receive any distribution on account of scheduled or
filed Claims.

All Distributions to the Holders of Allowed Claims shall be from
the Liquidating Trust. The Liquidating Trustee shall liquidate all
Assets of the Debtors and the Estate and distribute the Net
Proceeds of such liquidation from the Liquidating Trust in
accordance with this Plan and the Liquidating Trust Agreement.
  
A full-text copy of Trustee's Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 16,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3pBYkwz, from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for David M. Goodrich:

     Mark S. Horoupian
     SulmeyerKupetz
     A Professional Corporation
     333 South Grand Avenue, Suite 3400
     Los Angeles, California 90071
     Telephone: 213.626.2311
     Facsimile: 213.629.4520
     E-mail: mhoroupian@sulmeyerlaw.com

                      About Allied Injury

Headquartered in San Bernardino, California, Allied Injury
Management, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-14273) on May 11, 2016, estimating
assets between $10 million and $50 million and debts between $1
million and $10 million. The petition was signed by John R. Larson,
M.D., president. Judge Mark D. Houle presides over the case.

Alan W Forsley, Esq., and Marc Liberman, Esq., at Fredman Lieberman
Pearl LLP, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor
hired Michael Blue, Esq., at the Blue Law Group, Inc., as special
litigation counsel and Grobstein Teeple LLP as accountant.

The U.S. Trustee sought and obtained the Court's approval of the
appointment of David M. Goodrich as Chapter 11 Trustee.  The
Chapter 11 trustee retains Mark S. Horoupian at the law firm of
SulmeyerKupetz as his general bankruptcy counsel.


ALPHABET HOLDING: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Alphabet Holding Company, Inc. and other ratings that
are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was
conducted through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9,
2021 in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings
in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1,  2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Alphabet Holding Company, Inc.'s (doing business as Nature's
Bounty) B3 Corporate Family Rating reflects a portfolio of
well-known brands, good channel diversification, diversified
customer base, and high industry growth potential that reflects
increased health awareness and aging populations. The ratings are
challenged by high financial leverage, moderate scale when compared
to other corporate issuers within the same industry, a geographic
diversity that is skewed towards developed markets, and an
operating environment that is expected to remain challenging.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.  


AMERICAN CRYOSTEM: Incurs $46K Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
American CryoStem Corporation filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $46,034 on $126,600 of total revenues for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $271,860 on
$133,126 of total revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31,
2019.

As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $1.59 million in total assets,
$1.95 million in total liabilities, and a total shareholders'
deficit of $359,733.

The Company has incurred significant losses since its inception
which raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  Management has made this assessment
for the period one year from Feb. 16, 2021.  Management's plans
with regard to this matter are to continue to fund its operations
through fundraising activities in fiscal 2021 for future operations
and business expansion.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1468679/000101905621000132/acryo_1q21.htm

                        About American CryoStem

Eatontown, New Jersey-based American CryoStem Corporation (OTC:
CRYO) -- http://www.americancryostem.com-- is a developer,
marketer and global licensor of patented adipose tissue-based
cellular technologies and related proprietary services with a focus
on processing, commercial bio-banking and application development
for adipose (fat) tissue and autologous adipose-derived
regenerative cells (ADRCs).

American CryoStem reported a net loss of $1.18 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $1.08 million for
the year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company
had $1.47 million in total assets, $1.90 million in total
liabilities, and a total shareholders' deficit of $421,199.

Fruci & Associates II, PLLC, in Spokane, Washington, the Company's
auditor since 2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Jan. 4, 2021, citing that the Company has incurred
significant net losses since inception.  This factor raises
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


AMERICAN GREETINGS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of American Greetings Corporation and other ratings that
are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was
conducted through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9,
2021 in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings
in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

American Greetings Corporation's credit profile (B2 CFR) broadly
reflects its solid position in the US and UK greeting card markets,
where the company is one of two leading players, and our
expectation the company will remain vigilant with respect to
controlling expenses. The company has long-standing relationships
with many of its retail customers, supported by the highly
profitable nature of greeting cards and its long operating history
of over 100 years. American Greetings' benefits from the relatively
stable demand for its products, primarily driven by everyday life
events and holidays, and its adequate liquidity is supported by its
$250 million revolver due in 2023 which provides financial
flexibility to fund working capital seasonality. American
Greetings' credit profile also reflects its elevated financial
leverage, excluding the relatively high dividend preferred equity,
risks inherent in the mature and highly competitive greeting card
industry, and the company's high customer concentration. The
company's revenue has been pressured by net customer losses and
sluggish retail traffic both in the US and UK markets, somewhat
offset by new contract wins. However, a prolonged coronavirus
outbreak will negatively impact demand, because social gatherings
will be constrained, somewhat mitigated by its strong presence in
the grocery channel. Governance factors include the company's
aggressive financial policies under private equity ownership.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


AMERICANN INC: Incurs $502,284 Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Americann, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $502,284
on $271,585 of total revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31,
2020, compared to net income of $1.02 million on $34,691 of total
revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $15.01 million in total
assets, $9.64 million in total liabilities, and $5.37 million in
total stockholders' equity.

The Company had an accumulated deficit of $19,224,836 and
$18,722,552 at Dec. 31, 2020 and Sept. 30, 2020, respectively, and
had a net loss for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2020.  These
matters, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company said that
while it is attempting to increase operations and generate
additional revenues, its cash position may not be significant
enough to support the Company's daily operations.  Management
intends to raise additional funds through the sale of its
securities.

Management believes that the actions presently being taken to
further implement its business plan and generate additional
revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a
going concern.  While the Company believes in the viability of its
strategy to generate additional revenues and in its ability to
raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect.
The Company said its ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent upon the Company's ability to further implement its
business plan and generate additional revenues.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1508348/000143774921002979/acan20201231_10q.htm

                           About Americann

Headquartered in Denver, AmeriCann is a specialized cannabis
company that is developing cultivation, processing and
manufacturing facilities.

Americann reported a net loss of $709,343 for the year ended Sept.
30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $4.90 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company had $14.87
million in total assets, $8.99 million in total liabilities, and
$5.87 million in total stockholders' equity.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Dec. 21, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


AMERICANN INC: JV Partner Opens Retail Cannabis Dispensary
----------------------------------------------------------
AmeriCann's Joint Venture partner, Bask, Inc. announced that it
plans to open its adult-use retail cannabis dispensary.

AmeriCann has a 15-year Joint-Venture partnership with Bask that
provides AmeriCann with a 15 percent Revenue Participation Fee on
all Bask revenue generated from sales from AmeriCann's
Massachusetts Cannabis Center.  The commencement of Adult-Use sales
may increase Bask's revenue by 3-5 times which would positively
impact AmeriCann's Revenue Participation Fee.

Building 1, the initial phase of the MCC, is a 30,000 square foot
state-of-the-art cultivation and processing facility, 100% of which
is occupied by Bask.  In February of 2020, Bask commenced medical
cannabis operations at the MCC.  The adult-use retail dispensary
will operate out of Building 1.

The MCC, a planned one million square foot sustainable greenhouse,
processing and product manufacturing project in Freetown,
Massachusetts, is being developed by AmeriCann.

The Massachusetts cannabis market has some of the highest prices in
the United States, with wholesale prices exceeding $4,000 per pound
and retail prices greater than $7,000 per pound.  Adult use
cannabis sales in Massachusetts exceeded $1 billion last November
since the beginning of the program in 2018.

                           About Americann

Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, AmeriCann is a specialized
cannabis company that is developing cultivation, processing and
manufacturing facilities.

Americann reported a net loss of $709,343 for the year ended Sept.
30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $4.90 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company had $14.87
million in total assets, $8.99 million in total liabilities, and
$5.87 million in total stockholders' equity.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Dec. 21, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


ANASTASIA PARENT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa3 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Anastasia Parent, LLC and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Anastasia's Caa3 Corporate Family Rating reflects its high
financial leverage. The company's credit profile also reflects weak
operating performance with meaningful sales and earnings declines
elevating risk of a debt restructuring. The company's relatively
small scale compared to much larger cosmetic competitors, and
narrow focus in prestige color cosmetics leaves Anastasia highly
exposed to fashion risk when consumer preferences shift away from
the company's products. Larger competitors have greater scale,
possess more product and geographic diversity, and have greater
investment capacity through a range of economic cycles. Anastasia
has high specialty retail concentration at Sephora and Ulta given
that a significant amount of its revenues are generated from those
channels. The company has limited geographic diversity with a
significant amount of sales generated in the U.S. Anastasia's
credit profile is supported by the company's good brand name
recognition in niche markets and product development capabilities.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


APEX PARKS GROUP: Converts Case to Chapter 7 Liquidation
--------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill of Bloomberg Law reports that Apex Parks converted its
Chapter 11 bankruptcy case to Chapter 7 after the water and
amusement park operator said it had no assets left and lacks the
resources to confirm a liquidation plan.

The conversion, ordered Wednesday, February 17, 2021, means a
trustee, appointed by the U.S. Trustee, will wrap up the case. It
follows a June 2020 asset sale to an entity controlled by a group
of secured lenders led by Cerberus Business Finance LLC. The
entity, APX Operating Co., bought the assets for $45 million in
debt forgiveness and an agreement to pay off in cash Apex's $11.5
million post-bankruptcy loan.

             About TZEW Holdco and Apex Parks Group

TZEW Holdco, LLC, and its affiliates are privately-held owners and
operators of amusement parks, resorts, and family entertainment
centers across the United States.  Founded in 2014, the companies'
business strategy focuses on the acquisition, operation, growth,
and development of various properties into economical,
family-friendly entertainment and amusement venues.  The companies
locations include year-round family entertainment centers, water
parks, and amusement parks in states across the country, including
California, Texas and Florida.  Each of the companies' locations
provides affordable, family-friendly entertainment to local markets
and features numerous attractions, including rides, games, and
events.  On the Web: http://www.apexparksgroup.com/

Big Kahuna's Water and Adventure Park is a water park located in
Destin, Florida, which opened in 1986.  It is primarily a water
park, with more than 40 water attractions like lazy river, water
slides, and wave pool.  It also has a miniature golf and kids play
areas.

TZEW Holdco and its affiliates, including Apex Parks Group LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-10910) on April 8, 2020.  At the time of
the filing, the Debtors had estimated assets of between $50 million
and $100 million and liabilities of between $100 million and $500
million.  

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP as legal
counsel; Imperial Capital, LLC, as investment banker and financial
advisor; Paladin Management Group, LLC, as restructuring advisor;
and Kurtzman Carson, LLC as claims and noticing agent.


ART VAN FURNITURE: Heirs Buy Back Legal Rights to Name
------------------------------------------------------
Crains (Detroit) reports that the heirs of Archie Van Elslander
have bought back legal rights to the Art Van Furniture name, four
years after the family patriarch sold the furniture company to a
private-equity firm and nearly a year since the company went
bankrupt and began closing all of its nearly 200 stores.

Gary Van Elslander, son of the company's late founder and acting
through a family investment company called VEC, successfully bid $6
million for the naming rights.  The sale was approved Feb. 1 by a
bankruptcy court judge overseeing Art Van Furniture's still-ongoing
liquidation case.

A VEC representative declined to give an interview about the
family's future plans — if any — for use of the Art Van
Furniture brand, but issued a statement:

"The Art Van Furniture name was part of the Van Elslander family
for decades, from the time Art Van Elslander founded the company in
1959 until he sold it in 2017.  The Van Elslander family felt it
was important to reclaim the name that was, for so long, synonymous
with tremendous value and commitment to Michigan's communities.
They look forward to having the Art Van Furniture name back in the
family, where it belongs."

The last remaining Art Van Furniture stores closed last year with
everything-must-go sales that were put on by American Signature,
the parent company of Value City Furniture.

Many of the old Art Van stores were later reborn in late summer and
early fall as Loves Furniture, an entirely new company created by a
Texas private-equity firm.  But Loves encountered a slew of
setbacks, including expensive warehouse and logistical problems,
and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Jan. 6, 2021.

Gary and David Van Elslander wave to the crowd during the 91st
America's Thanksgiving Parade, presented by Art Van on Woodward
Avenue in Detroit on Thursday, Nov. 23, 2017.

Gary Van Elslander, who is president of  VEC, early on bid $2.1
million for the Art Van Furniture naming rights. Then American
Signature put in a $2.2 million bid on Jan. 20. VEC countered and
ultimately won the auction with its $6 million offer.

Gary Van Elslander didn't say in court documents what his plans are
for the Art Van Furniture name.  However, he did state that as part
of the naming rights purchase, his family is released from any past
non-compete and non-solicitation agreements.

Warren-based Art Van Furniture sold itself in early 2017 to
Boston-based private equity firm Thomas H. Lee Partners in a $612.5
million deal that included the sale of Art Van stores' real estate
to new landlords, who began to charge the stores rent.

Art Van Eslander died a year later at age 87.

                     About Art Van Furniture

Art Van is a brick-and-mortar furniture and mattress retailer
headquartered in Warren, Michigan.  The Company operates 169
locations, including 92 furniture and mattress showrooms and 77
freestanding mattress and specialty locations.  The Company does
business under brand names, including Art Van Furniture, Pure
Sleep, Scott Shuptrine Interiors, Levin Furniture, Levin Mattress,
and Wolf Furniture.

The Company was founded in 1959 and was owned by its founder, Art
Van Elslander, until it was sold to funds affiliated with Thomas H.
Lee Partners, L.P. in March 2017.  As part of this transaction, THL
acquired the operating assets of the Company and certain real
estate investment trusts, who closed the transaction alongside THL,
acquired the owned real estate portfolio of the Company, and
entered into long-term leases with Art Van.  The proceeds from the
sale-leaseback transaction were used to fund the purchase price
paid to the selling shareholders.

Art Van Furniture, LLC, and 12 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-10553) on March 8,
2020.

Art Van was estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP as
counsel.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the claims agent.


ASP EMERALD: S&P Places 'B' Issuer Credit Rating on Watch Pos.
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on ASP Emerald
Holdings LLC, including its 'B' issuer credit rating, on
CreditWatch with positive implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows LANXESS' announcement that it has
signed a definitive agreement to acquire Emerald for about $1.08
billion. S&P said, "We expect the transaction to close in the next
few months. We will likely raise our issuer credit rating on
Emerald to match our issuer credit rating on LANXESS and then
withdraw all of our ratings on Emerald assuming its debt is fully
repaid upon the close of the transaction."

S&P said, "We expect to resolve the CreditWatch following the
completion of the transaction. We will monitor any developments
related to the transaction, including the receipt of the necessary
shareholder approvals and regulatory clearances. We expect that the
transaction will be credit positive for Emerald given our stronger
investment-grade rating on LANXESS and its much larger scale. If
the transaction is completed as proposed, we will likely raise our
issuer credit rating on Emerald to equalize it with our 'BBB'
rating on LANXESS. We will then withdraw all of our ratings on
Emerald after the transaction closes and LANXESS pays down all of
its debt.

"If the transaction is not consummated, we will likely affirm our
'B' issuer credit rating on the company, remove the rating from
CreditWatch, and assign a stable outlook assuming its operating
performance and credit measures remain in our expected range for
the current rating."



ASTROTECH CORP: Closes $9.25M Registered Direct Offering
--------------------------------------------------------
Astrotech Corporation has closed its previously announced
registered direct offering priced at-the-market under Nasdaq rules
of 2,845,535 shares of its common stock at an offering price of
$3.25 per share for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $9.25
million.  The Company intends to use the net proceeds from this
offering for continuing operating expenses and working capital.

H.C. Wainwright & Co. acted as the exclusive placement agent for
the offering.

The shares of common stock were offered by Astrotech pursuant to a
"shelf" registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-226060)
previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 3, 2018 and declared effective by the SEC on Aug. 20, 2018.
The offering of the securities was made only by means of a
prospectus, including a prospectus supplement, forming a part of
the effective registration statement.  A final prospectus
supplement and accompanying prospectus relating to the shares of
common stock offered was filed with the SEC.  

Electronic copies of the final prospectus supplement and
accompanying prospectus may be obtained on the SEC's website at
www.sec.gov or by contacting H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC at 430 Park
Avenue, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10022, by phone at (646) 975-6996
or e-mail at placements@hcwco.com.

                            About Astrotech

Astrotech (NASDAQ: ASTC) -- http://www.astrotechcorp.com-- is a
science and technology development and commercialization company
that launches, manages, and builds scalable companies based on
innovative technology in order to maximize shareholder value. 1st
Detect develops, manufactures, and sells trace detectors for use in
the security and detection market. AgLAB is developing chemical
analyzers for use in the agriculture market. BreathTech is
developing a breath analysis tool to provide early detection of
lung diseases.  Astrotech is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Astrotech reported a net loss of $8.31 million for the year ended
June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $7.53 million for the year
ended June 30, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $23.58
million in total assets, $4.77 million in total liabilities, and
$18.81 million in total stockholders' equity.

Armanino LLP, in San Francisco, California, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Sept. 8, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has net cash flows deficiencies that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


ASTROTECH CORP: Incurs $1.6M Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
---------------------------------------------------------------
Astrotech Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $1.62 million on $130,000 of revenue for the three months ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.08 million on $205,000
of revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

For the six months ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of
$3.73 million on $270,000 of revenue compared to a net loss of
$4.15 million on $206,000 of revenue for the six months ended Dec.
31, 2019.

As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $23.58 million in total
assets, $4.77 million in total liabilities, and $18.81 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Since the beginning of the quarter, the Company successfully raised
a total of $37.0 million in gross proceeds, strengthening its
balance sheet for its future growth and expansion of its business.
The financings will allow for continued operating expenses and
working capital as the Company increases sales of its TRACER 1000
explosives trace detector (ETD) to DHL (Deutsche Post AG) and other
customers in the security market, launch the AgLAB-1000-D2 into the
hemp and cannabis industry, and develop, in partnership with The
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, the BreathTest-1000 to screen for
volatile organic compound (VOC) metabolites found in a person's
breath that could indicate they may have an infection, including
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) or the resulting disease,
pneumonia.

On the heels of the capital raises, the Company announced that 1st
Detect exceeded $1 million in purchase orders and an additional $1
million in future service & support commitments for its TRACER
1000. In December, the Company also announced that the TRACER 1000
ETD received a Gold Award for the Best CBRNE Detection System
category at American Security Today's 'ASTORS' Homeland Security
Awards program, the preeminent U.S. Homeland Security Awards
Program that highlights the most cutting-edge and forward-thinking
security solutions coming onto the market today.  The Company also
continues to get closer to domestic sales at 1st Detect.  Following
the successful completion of non-detection testing last quarter
with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the
Company has entered detection testing, which is the final phase
before the TRACER 1000 can be approved for cargo sales in the
United States.

"We are excited to have our superior technology recognized by a
leading voice in the security industry, to have passed the
significant $1 million purchase order milestone, and for our
progress with TSA.  We believe that we offer the most advanced ETD
on the market," stated Thomas B. Pickens III, chairman and chief
executive officer of Astrotech Corporation.  "Our work to bring our
Ag solution to the market continues to move forward as we receive
positive feedback and much interest from prospective customers.
Finally, our breath analysis efforts are progressing with The
Cleveland Clinic Foundation and we hope to have an update on our
work in the near-term," concluded Pickens.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1001907/000156459021006047/astc-10q_20201231.htm

                           About Astrotech

Astrotech (NASDAQ: ASTC) -- http://www.astrotechcorp.com-- is a
science and technology development and commercialization company
that launches, manages, and builds scalable companies based on
innovative technology in order to maximize shareholder value. 1st
Detect develops, manufactures, and sells trace detectors for use in
the security and detection market. AgLAB is developing chemical
analyzers for use in the agriculture market. BreathTech is
developing a breath analysis tool to provide early detection of
lung diseases.  Astrotech is headquartered in Austin, Texas.

Astrotech reported a net loss of $8.31 million for the year ended
June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $7.53 million for the year
ended June 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company had $3.18
million in total assets, $4.63 million in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $1.44 million.

Armanino LLP, in San Francisco, California, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Sept. 8, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has net cash flows deficiencies that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


AVERY ASPHALT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Avery Asphalt, Inc.
        7770 Venture Street
        Colorado Springs, CO 80915

Business Description: Avery Asphalt, Inc. is an asphalt paving
                      contractor based in Colorado.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 21-10799

Debtor's Counsel: David J. Warner, Esq.
                  WADSWORTH GARBER WARNER CONRARDY, P.C.
                  2580 West Main Street
                  Suite 200
                  Littleton, CO 80120
                  Tel: 303-296-1999
                  E-mail: dwarner@wgwc-law.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Aaron Avery, CEO.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/LUYBPZI/Avery_Asphalt_Inc__cobke-21-10799__0004.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/LBNDVKY/Avery_Asphalt_Inc__cobke-21-10799__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


AVERY EQUIPMENT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Avery Equipment, LLC
        7770 Venture Street
        Colorado Springs, CO 80951

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 21-10800

Debtor's Counsel: David J. Warner, Esq.
                  WADSWORTH GARBER WARNER CONRARDY, P.C.
                  2580 West Main Street
                  Suite 200
                  Littleton, CO 80120
                  Tel: 303-296-1999
                  E-mail: dwarner@wgwc-law.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Aaron Avery, manager.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/L24MKLY/Avery_Equipment_LLC__cobke-21-10800__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


AVERY HOLDINGS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Avery Holdings, LLC
        7770 Venture Street
        Colorado Springs, CO 80951

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 21-10801

Judge: Hon. Michael E. Romero

Debtor's Counsel: David J. Warner, Esq.
                  WADSWORTH GARBER WARNER CONRARDY, P.C.
                  2580 West Main Street
                  Suite 200
                  Littleton, CO 80120
                  Tel: 303-296-1999
                  E-mail: dwarner@wgwc-law.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Aaron Avery, manager.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/4F53A4Y/Avery_Holdings_LLC__cobke-21-10801__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


AVIS BUDGET: Moody's Gives B3 Rating on $600MM Sr. Unsecured Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 rating to Avis Budget Car
Rental, LLC's $600 million of senior unsecured notes. All other
ratings are unaffected including: at Avis the corporate family
rating at B2, senior secured credit at Ba2 and, the senior
unsecured at B3; and, at Avis Budget Finance PLC the senior
unsecured at B3. The speculative grade liquidity rating is SGL-3.
The outlook is negative.

The B3 rating of the notes reflect the pari passu ranking with
Avis's other senior unsecured debt. Proceeds will be used to redeem
the $500 million of 10.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 that are
rated Ba2, and for fees and expenses. The Ba2 rating of the 10.5%
Senior Secured Notes will be withdrawn upon close.

The following rating actions were taken:

Assignments:

Issuer: Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B3 (LGD5)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Avis's B2 CFR and other ratings reflect the still-weak global car
rental sector due to the coronavirus outbreak that is likely to
weigh meaningfully on business and leisure travel through 2022,
along with high financial leverage and high fixed operating costs
that limit the margin. The car rental sector will also be weighed
by the potential emergence from bankruptcy of major car rental
companies in the US and Europe.

The ratings also recognize the progress Avis made during 2020 in
contending with this environment. The company was able to: 1)
achieve a significant reduction in fleet in response to lower
demand; 2) maintain positive vehicle residual values while reducing
its fleet; and, 3) significantly reduce fixed costs, principally in
its on-airport locations. These actions will help the company to
better contend with still depressed demand levels.

Avis's cash and revolver liquidity position was $1.3 billion, as of
December 31, 2020, which is adequate to contend with the corporate
and fleet debt maturities in 2021.

Avis' principal environmental exposure arises from its storage of
petroleum products such as gasoline, diesel fuel and motor and
waste oils, and the treatment or discharge of waste waters. Moody's
expect that the company will remain in compliance with all related
requirements.

The company also maintains adequate relationships with its
employees, regulatory bodies and the communities in which it
operates.

The key governance risk is Avis's financial strategy which employs
a considerable amount to debt to fund the maintenance and the
annual expansion its vehicle fleet. This heavy reliance on debt
increases the company's vulnerability to operational stress and to
factors that could limit its access to needed funding.

The negative outlook reflects the continuing risk of the
challenging operating environment as a result of: the scope of the
air travel downturn; the possibility of spreading consumer economic
weakness; the challenge of accurately matching the pace of fleet
expansion with demand levels in the still-uncertain travel market ;
and, potential disruption in the used car market pricing
structure.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be downgraded in the event of a major
misalignment between Avis's fleet size and car rental demand. The
rating could also be downgraded if such a fleet vs. demand
misalignment were to develop at any major competitor as this could
lead to pressure on pricing and on the residual value of vehicles
sold in the used car market. Rating pressure would also result from
a disruption in the used car market or a resurgence of coronavirus
infections. Maintaining a liquidity position that comfortably
covers all twelve-month cash requirements will be essential in
maintaining the current ratings.

The ratings could be upgraded with: demonstrating optimal alignment
of the rental fleet with sustainable demand levels; a sustained
recovery in air travel; and, financial performance that includes an
EBITA margin approximating 4% and EBITA/interest exceeding 2.5x.

Avis Budget Group, Inc. is one of the world's leading car rental
companies through its Avis and Budget brands. The company's Zipcar
brand, is the world's leading car sharing network. The company's
revenues for the twelve months through December 2020 were $5.4
billion.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Equipment and
Transportation Rental Industry published in April 2017.


AVIS BUDGET: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'B+' ICR
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Parsippany, N.J.-based
car renter Avis Budget Group Inc. to stable from negative and
affirming the 'B+' issuer credit rating.

S&P said, "At the same time, we are raising our issue-level rating
on the company's unsecured debt to 'B' from 'B-' and revising our
recovery rating to '5'(15%) from '6'(5%). We are also assigning our
'B' issue-level rating and '5'(15%) recovery rating to its proposed
$600 million senior unsecured notes due 2029. Finally, we are
affirming our 'BB-' issue-level rating on its secured debt and
revising our rounded recovery estimate for the '2' recovery rating
to 85% from 70%.

"We expect Avis Budget's credit metrics to improve in 2021
following the significant decline in its performance in 2020 due to
the effects of the coronavirus. This improvement reflects our
expectation for an increase in airline travel later in 2021 as the
vaccines become more prevalent and the company continues to improve
its operating performance. Avis Budget generates the majority of
its revenue at airports globally and thus relies on airline
passenger travel to support its demand. To offset the steep decline
in air travel and the demand for its vehicles, the company has
reduced its costs (by over $2.5 billion in 2020) and its fleet
through the cancellation of new vehicle orders and the sale of used
vehicles. Avis Budget has benefited from strong used car prices
that have reduced its vehicle costs (when used car prices are
strong, this is reflected in a lower depreciation expense). In
2020, the company's revenue declined by 41% and it lost $684
million, which compares with its profit of $302 million in 2019.
However, Avis Budget cut its capital spending to $5.4 billion in
2020 from $12.9 billion in 2019 and reduced its balance sheet debt
by $3.4 billion over that period. In addition, its EBIT interest
coverage was -0.5x in 2020 (compared with 1.5x in 2019) and its FFO
to debt was 8.4% (compared with 18.3% in 2019). We don't expect
passenger travel to begin to recover until later in 2021 when the
COVID-19 vaccines become more prevalent, although the strong used
car prices could moderate somewhat in 2021. However, due to
management's ongoing cost initiatives and its smaller fleet, we
expect Avis Budget's credit metrics to improve in 2021 and
thereafter, with EBIT interest coverage of about 1x and FFO to debt
in the low-teens percent area over this period.

"We continue to assess Avis Budget's liquidity as adequate. As of
Dec. 31, 2020, the company had $692 billion of unrestricted cash,
availability of $629 million under its corporate revolving credit
facility, and availability of $4.9 billion under its vehicle
financing facilities. Avis Budget will use the proceeds from the
proposed unsecured notes to redeem the $500 million 10.5% secured
notes it issued in May 2020 when its liquidity was more
constrained. Combined with our expectation for continued low
capital spending relative to before the pandemic, we now expect the
company's liquidity sources to cover uses by about 2.5x over the
next 12 months.

"The revision of our recovery estimates for Avis Budget's debt
reflects the planned redemption of its $500 million secured notes.
We are revising our recovery rating on the company's existing
unsecured debt and our rounded recovery estimate for its secured
debt based on its pro forma redemption of the outstanding $500
million 10.5% secured notes it issued in May 2020 with the proceeds
from its proposed unsecured notes, which will reduce the amount of
secured debt in its capital structure.

"The stable outlook on Avis Budget reflects our expectation that
its credit metrics will continue to improve in 2021 and thereafter.
We expect the volume of airline traffic to begin to recover later
in 2021 as the COVID-19 vaccines become more prevalent and the
company continues to benefit from the substantial cost reductions
and strong used car prices that have reduced its depreciation
expense. We expect Avis Budget's credit metrics to improve through
2022 (though not to the same levels as before the pandemic), with
EBIT interest coverage of about 1x and FFO to debt in the low teens
percent area, which compares with EBIT interest coverage of -0.5x
and FFO to debt of 8.4% in 2019.

"We could lower our rating on Avis Budget if its FFO to debt
remains in the high single-digit percent area for a sustained
period or its liquidity becomes constrained. This could occur
because of weaker-than-expected air travel or a prolonged decline
in used car prices.

"We could raise our rating on Avis Budget if airline travel
recovers significantly, causing its EBIT interest coverage to rise
to at least 1.1x and its FFO to debt to increase to more than 12%
for a sustained period."


AVIVAR HOSPITALITY: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 100% in Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Avivar Hospitality, LLC, submitted a First Amended Plan of
Reorganization and a corresponding Disclosure Statement on Feb. 16,
2021.

The Debtor anticipates increased revenues beginning in calendar
year 2021 due to the development of vaccines to control the spread
of Covid-19, coupled with increased travel and demand for its
facilities. The Debtor expects that revenue per available room will
return to prepandemic levels by 2024.  The company has obtained a
commitment for a new Equity Contribution from Sterling Holdings,
LLC of $2,000,000.  In return for this contribution, Sterling will
own substantially all of the Equity Interests in the Reorganized
Debtor.

The Debtor projects that it will have sufficient cash on hand on
the Effective Date of the Plan to cure the outstanding arrearages
owed to its primary secured creditor (which holds two liens against
the Debtor's real property and related rents), and to pay all
Allowed Administrative Claims and unsecured trade debts in full. A
junior loan encumbering the Debtor's real property will be
restructured and paid over an amortization period of thirty years
(with a ten-year maturity date). A fourth loan, secured only by the
Debtor's furniture, fixtures, and equipment, will be restructured
and paid over a term of ten years.

The Plan also contemplates that, if the Debtor's secured
obligations are not sooner satisfied or refinanced, the Hotel
Property will be sold in 2028.  Remaining claims against the Estate
will be paid from the sale proceeds.  The Plan encompasses certain
agreements among the Debtor, Sterling, the current owner of the
Debtor's Equity Interests, and others.  The filing of the Plan
constitutes a request for approval of these agreements, which
include settlement of potential Avoidance Actions.

Class 7 consists of all Allowed Unsecured Deficiency Claims. The
Debtor estimates that the amount of all Allowed Unsecured
Deficiency Claims will be $7,782,600.  These Claims shall be
treated as unsecured obligations of the Reorganized Debtor.  Each
holder of an Allowed Unsecured Deficiency Claim will be paid 50% of
the amount of such Claim as of the Petition Date in a single
distribution on the Sale Closing Date or as soon as practicable
thereafter.

Class 8 consists of all Allowed Unsecured Claims in amounts of
$7,500 or less each.  The Debtor estimates that the amount of all
Unsecured Convenience Claims will be $23,400.  Holders of Unsecured
Convenience Claims will be paid in full on account of their
respective Unsecured Claims as of the Petition Date (up to a
maximum of $7,500 per Creditor) in a single distribution on or
before the Effective Date of the Plan.

Class 9 consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claim of Sterling.  The
Debtor estimates that the Allowed Unsecured Claim of Sterling will
be $3,000,000.  Pursuant to the Sterling-Lotus Settlement as set
forth in the Plan, this Claim will be deemed an allowed unsecured
Claim against the Estate in the amount of $3,000,000.  However,
contingent upon occurrence of the Effective Date, no distributions
shall be made with respect to the Allowed Unsecured Claim of
Sterling.

Class 10 consists of all Allowed Unsecured Claims not otherwise
classified in the Plan.  The Debtor estimates that the amount of
all Allowed General Unsecured Claims will be $117,861 with 100%
estimated recovery.  The holders of Allowed General Unsecured
Claims will be paid in full on account of their respective
Unsecured Claims as of the Petition Date in a single distribution
on or before the Effective Date of the Plan.

Class 11 consists of the Allowed Equity Interests in the Debtor,
held by Lotus Holdings, LLC (100%).  The Equity Interests in the
Debtor will be canceled as of the Effective Date, and the holder of
the Equity Interests shall receive no distributions or retain any
property under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
Feb. 16, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3ucqX77 from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Richard S. Wright, Esq.
     Caleb Brown, Esq.
     MOON WRIGHT & HOUSTON, PLLC
     121 W. Trade Street, Suite 1950
     Charlotte, NC 28202
     Tel: (704) 944-6560
     Fax: (704) 944-0380

                   About Avivar Hospitality

Avivar Hospitality, LLC, owns and operates a dual-branded hotel,
comprised of a Residence Inn by Marriott and a Courtyard by
Marriott, located at 9110 Harris Corners Parkway, Charlotte, North
Carolina.  The hotels offer a combined 188 guest rooms, together
with dining, conference, and recreational facilities.

Avivar Hospitality, based in Raleigh, NC, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 20-30789) on Aug. 27, 2020.  In
its petition, the Debtor was estimated to have $10 million to $50
million in both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by
Anuj Mittal, manager of Lotus Holdings, LLC.  The Hon. Laura T.
Beyer presides over the case.  Moon Wright & Houston, PLLC, serves
as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


B-LINE CARRIERS: Court Allows Cash Collateral Use Until March 22
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Caryl E. Delano of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida, Tampa Division, authorized B-Line Carriers,
Inc., to use cash collateral on an interim basis, pending a further
hearing on the Debtor's cash collateral motion, which is scheduled
for March 22, 2021 at 2 p.m.

Judge Delano authorized the Debtor to use Cash Collateral
including, without limitation, cash, deposit accounts, accounts
receivable, and proceeds from its business operations in accordance
with the approved budget, as long as the aggregate of all expenses
for each week do not exceed the amount in the Budget by more than
10% for any such week on a cumulative basis.

The approved Budget projects total expenses in the amount of
$34,714 for the week ending February 20, 2021, $158,397 for the
week ending February 27, 2021, $46,338 for the week ending March 6,
2021, $161,755 for the week ending March 13, 2021, $37,513 for the
week ending March 20, 2021, and $161,195 for the week ending March
27, 2021.

The Debtor is also authorized to make adequate protection payments
to BMO Harris, in the amount of $1,423 on the week ending February
20, 2021.  In addition, Regions Bank, N.A. and the U.S. Small
Business Administration are granted replacement liens in and upon
all of the categories and types of collateral in which they held a
security interest and lien as of the Petition Date to the same
extent, validity and priority that they held as of the Petition
Date.  Cadence Bank, N.A. is granted a replacement lien on cash to
the extent of $35,000.00 with the same validity and priority that
it held as of the Petition Date.  Regions Bank consented to a
carve-out for the replacement lien being granted to Cadence.

                    About B-Line Carriers

B-Line Carriers, Inc., a full-service petroleum transportation
company, filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 20-06034) on Aug.
7, 2020.  The petition was signed by Jason L. Baldree, president.
At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in both assets and liabilities.  Amy Denton Harris, Esq.,
at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., is serving as the
Debtor's counsel.  On Jan. 5, 2021, the Court appointed Moecker
Auctions, Inc. as Auctioneer.


BRACHIUM INC: Gets OK to Hire Macdonald Fernandez as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Brachium, Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of California to employ Macdonald Fernandez
LLP as its bankruptcy counsel.

The firm's services include the formulation of the Debtor's Chapter
11 plan, the preparation of bankruptcy schedules and statement of
financial affairs, the evaluation of claims, reviewing monthly
operating reports and responding to creditor inquiries.

Macdonald Fernandez will be paid at these rates:

     Partners              $535 to $690 per hour
     Associate Attorneys   $335 to $435 per hour
     Paralegals            $175 per hour

The firm received the sum of $25,000 as a retainer.

Macdonald Fernandez is a "disinterested person" as defined by
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court papers
filed by the firm.  

The firm can be reached through:

     Iain A. Macdonald, Esq.
     Macdonald Fernandez LLP
     221 Sansome Street, Third Floor
     San Francisco, CA 94104
     Tel: (415) 362-0449
     Fax: (415) 394-5544
     Email: iain@macfern.com

                       About Brachium Inc.

Brachium, Inc. -- http://brachium.com-- is a healthcare technology
startup redefining the dental experience using robotics, machine
learning and digital augmentation.

Brachium filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 21-30047) on
Jan. 25, 2021.  Yaz Shehab, chief executive officer, signed the
petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $1 million
and $10 million.

Judge Hannah L. Blumenstiel presides over the case.

Iain A. Macdonald, Esq., at Macdonald Fernandez LLP, serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


CALAIS REGIONAL HOSPITAL: Down East Buys Rival Out of Bankruptcy
----------------------------------------------------------------
David Marino Jr. and Matthew Stone of Bangor Daily News report that
Down East Community Hospital in Machias said Friday, February 19,
2021, that it plans to purchase the only other hospital in
Washington County, Calais Regional Hospital, which has been in
bankruptcy since 2019.

Calais Regional Hospital, which would become Calais Community
Hospital under the new ownership, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
in 2019 after several years of operating in the red.  The hospital
had cut services in recent years, including outpatient cancer care
in 2018 and labor and delivery services the year before that.

Down East had been looking to purchase Calais Regional for several
months, the Machias hospital said Friday, Feb. 19, 2021, in
announcing its intention to purchase the Calais hospital.  Hospital
President Steve Lail said he hopes to bring several services back
to the hospital, including full-time general surgery.

Down East Community Hospital has been working with many of the
Calais hospital's creditors on the acquisition plan.

Under that plan, the leadership at Down East Community would
oversee both hospitals. Down East hopes to rebuild Calais Regional
by improving the hospital’s profits while reducing expenses, Lail
said.

"We will be two hospitals, with one team, and one focus," Lail
said.

In 2018, the last year for which financial data are available,
Calais Regional Hospital posted a loss of $550,000, down from
losing $2.2 million the previous year. In the 13 months after it
filed for bankruptcy in September 2019, the hospital posted more
than $4 million in losses, according to documents filed in U.S.
Bankruptcy Court. The hospital has also incurred more than $800,000
in costs — largely legal expenses — related to its bankruptcy
filing, according to those documents.

Down East Community Hospital, meanwhile, has operated in the black
in recent years, a feat that hasn't been universal among Maine's
small hospitals, according to the Maine Health Data Organization.
The Machias hospital posted a gain of $426,000 in 2018, the last
year for which data are available, down from a $739,000 gain the
previous year.

Under plans filed in U.S. Bankruptcy court, an entity affiliated
with Down East Community Hospital, called Calais Community
Hospital, would assume debt to buy the Calais hospital out of
bankruptcy and pay some of the largest creditors.  The plans filed
in bankruptcy court estimate the Calais hospital's assets at $14.2
million.

Leaders at Calais Regional Hospital were surprised to see Down East
Community Hospital's acquisition plan proposed in bankruptcy court
because discussions between the two hospitals had "died off" last
year, said Dee Dee Travis, a spokesperson for the Calais hospital.

Calais Regional Hospital's board of directors generally supports
the plan, Travis said, noting that several details still have to be
worked out. The hospital's "ultimate goal is to ensure that the
community will continue to have hospital services close to home,"
she said.

Last spring of 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic forced health care
providers to cancel many procedures, depriving them of crucial
revenue, Calais Regional Hospital warned it might have to close its
doors by the start of summer without more federal aid. It also said
it would cut 10 percent of its workforce.

The Calais hospital, along with Penobscot Valley Hospital in
Lincoln, which was also in bankruptcy, was unable to qualify for a
Paycheck Protection Program loan because program rules didn’t
allow loans to go to businesses in bankruptcy.

At one point, the Calais hospital proposed temporarily exiting
bankruptcy so it could qualify for a Paycheck Protection Program
loan, but later abandoned those plans. It also unsuccessfully sued
the U.S. Small Business Administration to change program rules to
allow businesses in bankruptcy to qualify for aid.

Until November, the Calais hospital had been in the midst of a
prolonged contract dispute with employees, including registered
nurses, medical laboratory scientists, laboratory technologists and
radiology technologists. Eighty-four percent of the hospital's
unionized employees last fall signed a petition of no confidence in
Calais Regional's CEO, Rod Boula, demanding that he be fired.

The employees later planned to strike, before calling off those
plans after reaching a contract agreement with hospital management
in mid-November.

"We are hopeful that this is a new beginning for our hospital,"
said Alison Monaghan, a nurse and union steward. "This has been a
long road for all of the employees and for the community that we
serve. We are ready to help put our hospital on a new path where
everyone's voices are heard."

The 25-bed Calais hospital has 259 employees, according to
bankruptcy filings, and it owed about $25 million to nearly 1,900
creditors. It owed the largest sums to the U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Katahdin Trust Company, First National Bank and the
Maine Department of Health and Human Services. It owed more than $3
million to vendors, including a medical staffing firm and a
Tennessee-based company that previously managed the hospital.

If the Down East Community Hospital acquisition is completed by
March 31, the Calais hospital -- which would no longer be in
bankruptcy -- would apply for a Paycheck Protection Program loan,
according to bankruptcy court documents describing the transaction.
Calais Regional is also expecting reconciliation payments from the
federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Maine
Department of Health and Human Services that could also brighten
the hospital's financial outlook, according to the court
documents.

Down East Community Hospital's purchase of Calais Regional needs to
be approved by a judge presiding over the bankruptcy before it is
finalized.

                  About Calais Regional Hospital

Based in Calais, Maine, Calais Regional Hospital operates as a
non-profit organization offering cardiac rehabilitation, emergency,
food and nutrition, home health, inpatient care unit, laboratory,
nursing, radiology, respiratory care and stress testing, surgery,
and social services. Visit https://www.calaishospital.org/ for more
information.

Calais Regional Hospital filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Maine Case No. 19-10486) on Sept. 17, 2019.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of between $10 million and $50
million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Michael A. Fagone oversees the case.  

Debtor tapped Murray Plumb & Murray as its bankruptcy counsel,
Spinglass Management LLC as financial advisor; and Kelly, Remmel &
Zimmerman and Norman Hanson Detroy LLC as special counsel.


CAMBER ENERGY: Inks Merger Agreement with Viking Energy
-------------------------------------------------------
Camber Energy, Inc. and Viking Energy Group, Inc. have entered into
a definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of Feb. 15,
2021, regarding the full combination of the two entities.

Camber already owns approximately 62% of Viking's issued and
outstanding common shares, and the Merger Agreement contemplates,
through a reverse triangular merger structure, Camber issuing
newly-issued shares of common stock in exchange for the balance of
Viking's common stock on a one-for-one basis.  For example, if a
Viking shareholder owns 100 shares of common stock of Viking
immediately prior to closing of the Merger, the shareholder would
receive 100 shares of common stock of Camber on closing of the
Merger.

James Doris, president and CEO of the two companies, commented, "We
are very pleased with the transactions that have been completed
between Camber and Viking in the last 60 days, and are excited
about this final step to fully combine the two entities, which we
believe will put the organization in an even better position to
increase stakeholder value."

The Merger Agreement also contemplates each outstanding share of
Series C Preferred Stock of Viking being exchanged for one share of
Series A Preferred Stock of Camber, which will have the
characteristics as set out in the Merger Agreement.  Completion of
the Merger is subject to a number of conditions, including but not
limited to receipt of all required regulatory, corporate and
third-party approvals, including the approval of the stockholders
of each of Viking and Camber, and the fulfillment of all applicable
regulatory requirements.

A full-text copy of the Agreement and Plan of Merger is available
for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1309082/000147793221000935/cei_ex21.htm

                       About Camber Energy

Based in Houston, Texas, Camber Energy -- http://www.camber.energy
-- is primarily engaged in the acquisition, development and sale of
crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids from various known
productive geological formations, including from the Hunton
formation in Lincoln, Logan, Payne and Okfuskee Counties, in
central Oklahoma; the Cline shale and upper Wolfberry shale in
Glasscock County, Texas; and Hutchinson County, Texas, in
connection with its Panhandle acquisition which closed in March
2018.

Camber Energy reported a net loss of $3.86 million for the year
ended March 31, 2020, compared to net income of $16.64 million for
the year ended March 31, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company
had $11.79 million in total assets, $1.61 million in total
liabilities, $6 million in preferred stock (series C), and $4.18
million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since 2015,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated June 29,
2020, citing that the Company has incurred significant losses from
operations and had an accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2020 and
2019.  These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


CAMP CROTEAU: Seeks Cash Collateral Access Thru July 15
-------------------------------------------------------
Camp Croteau, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, Riverside Division, for authorization to
continue using cash collateral from March 15, 2021 through July 15,
2021.

"Debtor has stabilized its operations and has progressed in its
reorganization.  In the last eight months, Debtor has consolidated
its financial records and updated its recordkeeping.  The Debtor's
principals visit on-site operations more frequently now which has
created greater efficiency and has improved Debtor's standard
practices.  Debtor has reopened its doors for business following
the pandemic closure and is now obtaining new clients.  Debtor has
negotiated with its creditor, Labor Commissioner's Office, has made
an offer in compromise to payoff the debt, and has performed under
the agreement.  Further, Debtor is in the process of negotiating
with the creditors whose claims arose based on a contingent
repayment guaranty on two USSBA loans secured by the assets of
other insolvent entities," the Debtor tells the Court.

The Debtor's assets include furniture, fixtures, machinery,
equipment, sports equipment, and cash.  As of the Petition Date,
the Debtor's assets have an approximate value of $140,046.  The
senior secured creditor U.S. Small Business Administration has
blanket security interests over all of the Debtor's assets.  The
balance of the loan on the Petition Date is $190,000.

The Debtor says it needs to use cash collateral to continue to
operate.  It also says since all of the Debtor's receivables and
accounts are security for its loan with the SBA, the Debtor has no
income that is not cash collateral.  The Debtor explains that if it
cannot use the cash collateral, it will either have to seek
post-petition financing or close the business.

"Any post-petition financing would result in less money for
Debtor's creditors because of the additional costs and
subordination of liens.  Using cash collateral would enable Debtor
to continue its business without having to incur more debt.
Closing the business would destroy Debtor's chance of
reorganization and result in little to no payment to creditors
since all its hard assets are subject to purchase money security
interests," the Debtor explains.

The Debtor's proposed four-month budget projects total expenses in
the amount of $35,640.84 for each of the months of April, May, June
and July.  "To protect the Debtor from fluctuations in its
expenses, Debtor requests that it be permitted to have the
flexibility to increase expenditures by up to 20% for any line item
in the budget and 15% in the aggregate.  Some expenses may not be
required to be paid each month, and Debtor requests authority to
'carry over' the unused amount to subsequent months when the
expense is paid.  With this flexibility, Debtor can operate its
business with minimal disruption and cost," the Debtor tells the
Court.

The Debtor says it is willing to offer adequate protection in the
form of replacement liens in the same priority and validity as the
secured creditors held pre-petition.  The Debtor adds it is willing
to offer adequate protection in the form of periodic cash payments
to the secured creditor in an amount deemed necessary.  The Debtor
avers that its proposed budget reflects an average monthly surplus
of $2,259 that may be used to pay the secured creditor such
periodic cash payments.  The Debtor says it also has $104,563 in
its DIP Bank account as of January 29, 2021.

                    About Camp Croteau

Camp Croteau, Inc. filed its chapter 11 petition on June 29, 2020
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 20-14458), listing under $500,000 in
assets and $500,001 to $1 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Scott C. Clarkson oversees the case.

Camp Croteau, Inc. is represented by:

          Todd Turoci, Esq.
          Dustin Nirschl, Esq.
          THE TUROCI FIRM
          3845 Tenth Street
          Riverside, CA 92501
          Telephone: 888-332-8362
          Email: mail@theturocifirm.com

The Debtor has filed a Subchapter V plan of reorganization.  A
hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan has been continued to
March 9.


CARECENTRIX HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on CareCentrix
Holdings Inc. to 'B-' from 'B'. The outlook is stable. S&P also
lowered the issue-level rating on subsidiary CareCentrix Inc.'s
senior debt to 'B-' from 'B'. The '3' recovery rating on this debt
indicates expectations for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate:
55%) recovery in a default.

S&P said, "We expect credit metrics to deteriorate significantly
over the next 12 months due to the near-term impacts the loss of
Cigna will have on EBITDA and margins.  While CareCentrix was able
to increase the scope of existing contracts and win new contracts
in recent months, we expect 2021 revenue to contract by about 40%
from 2020. Margins will also be compressed as the company works to
remove about $100 million of annualized costs associated with the
Cigna contract during the year. We expect leverage will exceed 11x
in 2021 before falling in 2022. We also expect a free operating
cash flow (FOCF) deficit of about $40 million-$50 million in 2021
before it returns to positive in 2022 to about $10 million.

"We now view the business as riskier due to mix shift to risk-based
contracts from fee-for-service following the loss of Cigna.  We
expect risk-based contracts to generate about half of the company's
revenue for 2021 and increase the potential variability of
earnings. We continue to assess the company's business risk profile
as weak due to its narrow business focus, high client
concentration, and below-average profitability. CareCentrix's
client concentration remains high, with its top four customers
expected to contribute more than 90% of gross profits. We view the
greatest long-term risk to the company as the potential for
insurance companies to in-source the services CareCentrix offers,
as occurred with the Cigna contract. We also see potential
heightened competition for clients and pricing pressure as
insurance companies, such as eviCore (a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ExpressScripts/Cigna) and naviHealth (a wholly-owned subsidiary of
OptumHealth/UnitedHealth Group Inc.), as well as independent
providers AIM Specialty Health and myNEXUS, compete for clients.
Still, we view CareCentrix as having an established position in the
industry, good scale (about $1.2 billion in revenue projected for
2021), limited exposure to government reimbursement, and a
successful track record in renewing and expanding contracts with
existing customers, as well as attracting new customers. Likewise,
we expect many midsize insurance companies will prefer doing
business with independent third-party partners such as CareCentrix
rather than subsidiaries of larger health insurance companies.

"Our assessment of the company's financial risk profile reflects
expectations for negative free cash flow in 2021 and heightened
leverage following Cigna's departure. Although the company has
maintained leverage below 4.5x over the past four years and has a
cash balance of over $230 million, we expect the company's debt
leverage will rise above 11x over the next 12 months and remain
elevated at about 8x-9x in 2022. We expect the company will
prioritize growth over debt repayment until EBITDA stabilizes. We
expect a free cash flow deficit of about $40 million-$50 million in
2021 before free cash flow grows to about $10 million in 2022 from
new contract wins and strong organic growth. We note there is a
higher-than-usual degree of uncertainty regarding 2022 cash flow
and leverage projections given changes to customer composition,
risk-based contract concentration, and the company's cost
structure. However, given the company's history of profitable
operations and strong cash position, we expect a significant
improvement in 2022 regarding both cash flow and leverage.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that free cash flow deficits
will be manageable in 2021 before meaningfully improving in 2022
through costs savings and new client wins.

"We could downgrade the company if we expected free operating cash
flow (FOCF) deficits to persist beyond 2021 that led us to conclude
the capital structure were unsustainable. This could occur due to
substantially higher-than-expected medical costs in risk-based
contracts or an unexpected loss of one or more of the company's
largest clients. Given contract lengths, revenue visibility, and
the flexible cost structure, we do not expect a downgrade over the
next 12 months.

"We could raise our rating to 'B' if we expected CareCentrix to
sustain reported annual free operating cash flow above 3% of debt
(about $15 million at the current capital structure), which could
materialize through new contract growth, a faster-than-expected
recovery in EBITDA margins following the loss of Cigna as a
customer, or higher-than-expected profits from risk-based
contracts."


CARVER BANCORP: Incurs $1.3 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Carver Bancorp, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $1.31 million on $5.24 million of total interest income for the
three months ended Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $1.44
million on $5.49 million of total interest income for the three
months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

For the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2020, the Company reported a net
loss of $2.93 million on $15.10 million of total interest income
compared to a net loss of $3.62 million on $16.36 million of total
interest income for the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $686.40 million in total
assets, $639.99 million in total liabilities, and $46.41 million in
total equity.

Carver Bancorp said it is closely monitoring its asset quality,
liquidity, and capital positions and that its  management is
actively working to minimize the current and future impact of the
COVID-19 pandemic and is making adjustments to operations to help
slow the spread of the virus.

"In addition, as a result of further actions that may be taken to
contain or reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company
may experience changes in the value of collateral securing
outstanding loans, reductions in the credit quality of borrowers
and the inability of borrowers to repay loans in accordance with
their terms.  The Company is actively managing the credit risk in
its loan portfolio, including reviewing the industries that the
Company believes are most likely to be impacted by emerging
COVID-19 events. These and similar factors and events may have
substantial negative effects on the business, financial condition,
and results of operations of the Company and its customers," Carver
Bancorp said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1016178/000101617821000007/carv-20201231.htm

                         About Carver Bancorp

Carver Bancorp, Inc., is the holding company for Carver Federal
Savings Bank, a federally chartered savings bank. The Company is
headquartered in New York, New York.  The Company conducts business
as a unitary savings and loan holding company, and the principal
business of the Company consists of the operation of its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Carver Federal.  Carver Federal was
founded in 1948 to serve African-American communities whose
residents, businesses and institutions had limited access to
mainstream financial services.  The Bank remains headquartered in
Harlem, and predominantly all of its seven branches and four
stand-alone 24/7 ATM centers are located in low- to moderate-income
neighborhoods.

Carver Bancorp reported a net loss of $5.42 million for the year
ended March 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $5.94 million for
the year ended March 31, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company
had $672.65 million in total assets, $626.26 million in total
liabilities, and $46.39 million in total equity.


CCRR PARENT: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned CCRR Parent Inc. its 'B' issuer credit
rating. The outlook is stable. S&P also assigned its 'B'
issue-level and '3' recovery ratings to the company's term loan B
and revolver.

S&P's stable rating outlook reflects S&P's expectation that despite
EBITDA growth and positive cash flow generation, CCRR Parent Inc.
will maintain leverage above 5x given the aggressive financial
policy and sponsor ownership.

Modest scale and narrow focus within the highly fragmented travel
nurse and fast response healthcare staffing market. S&P expects
that pro forma for the combination, CCRR will generate annual
revenues of approximately $600 million-$700 million within a highly
fragmented and cyclical nurse staffing industry. The combined
company's segments include traditional travel nurse staffing (about
43% of revenues), fast response nurse staffing (44%), strike
staffing (7%), and outsourced cardiology (5%).

The company provides staffing through direct channels to hospital
or healthcare systems and as a partner to managed service providers
(MSPs), including larger healthcare staffing players such as AMN
Healthcare, Medical Solutions, and AYA Healthcare. S&P said, "We
view CCRR's unique role as a non-MSP affiliate to many larger MSPs
favorably, as it reduces the risk of losing positions to dedicated
providers and maintains strong relationships across the staffing
spectrum. We believe the company's more concentrated focus on nurse
staffing to be riskier relative to its healthcare staffing peers
due the industry's cyclical nature."

The two largest segments relate to nurse staffing, with traditional
travel nurse staffing addressing routine travel assignments, and
fast response staffing addressing more immediate needs triggered by
a sudden imbalance in nurse staffing. The combined company will be
the fourth-largest provider of travel nurse staffing services with
approximately 9% market share in the travel nurse segment.

The company will operate with good geographic diversification, with
California (13% of revenues) and New York (11%) contributing the
most revenue and no other state representing over 10% of revenues.
The company's cost structure is 90% variable, insulating its
profitability from potential economic downturns. However, the
company does have some customer concentration with its top-two
customers.

S&P believes the company's diverse offerings provide a modest
advantage by enabling the cross-selling of its services and
creating incremental economies of scale.

Favorable industry dynamics driven by an aging population,
persistent shortage of nursing staff, a growing insured population,
and increasing industry focus on quality patient care. The
contingent labor market has favorable industry dynamics, has been
helped by demand during the recent pandemic.

The company's fast response and traditional travel nurse segments
saw a substantial increase in demand during the pandemic as
COVID-19 patients strained hospital staff across the country. S&P
expects this demand to remain elevated in the immediate term, but
to subside to pre-pandemic levels over the next few quarters.

Additionally, an increase in nurse unionization and anticipation of
a resumption of more normal staff strikes are tailwinds for the
company's small but higher-margin strike preparedness segment over
the next 12-18 months. Indeed, as the pandemic moderates, S&P
expects healthcare unions to revisit their collective bargaining
agreements, which could spur negotiations that may result in labor
strikes.

S&P said, "We expect good free cash flow generation of $40
million-$50 million annually starting in 2022, despite high
leverage over the next 12 months. We expect leverage at transaction
close of about 6x, remaining within the 5x-6x range for the next 12
months, driven by continued demand during the pandemic and
eventually stabilizing. We expect an aggressive financial policy
given the sponsor ownership, and we expect the company to pursue
growth through acquisitions. Therefore, we expect adjusted debt
leverage to persistently remain above 5x, despite good free cash
flow generation.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that once the pandemic
subsides, CCRR Parent will maintain stable EBITDA margins and
generate steady cash flow generations. Additionally, we expect
revenues to generally grow after 2021, once the pandemic subsides.
We expect adjusted debt leverage to remain above 5x due to an
aggressive financial policy given the sponsor ownership.

"We could lower our rating if the company experiences unforeseen
operational disruptions, such as integration challenges, customer
losses, or reduced demand during an extended economic downturn.
This may result in revenue declines or EBITDA margin contraction of
about 450 basis points, resulting in free operating cash flow to
debt below 3% and leverage remaining above 7x for an extended
period.

"Though unlikely given the company's sponsor ownership, we could
raise our rating on CCRR Parent if we expect leverage sustained
below 5x and a funds from operations (FFO)-to-total-debt ratio of


CHRISTIAN CARE: Fitch Lowers Series 2014 and 2016 Bonds to 'D'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded to 'D' from 'B+' the series 2014 and
2016 retirement facility revenue bonds issued by Mesquite Health
Facilities Development Corporation, TX on behalf of Christian Care
Centers (Christian Care).

The bonds are removed from Rating Watch Negative.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a gross revenue pledge, mortgage liens on
Christian Care's property and debt service reserve funds.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

PAYMENT DEFAULT: The downgrade to 'D' from 'B+' reflects Christian
Care's failure to pay the principal payments on its bonds that were
due on Feb. 15, 2021. Failure to make payment of principal under
the contractual terms of the rated obligation constitute a default,
per Fitch's rating definition. Due to ongoing financial
difficulties that have been exacerbated by the coronavirus
pandemic, Christian Care has failed to make its payments toward
debt service to the trustee since November 2020. Christian Care
made the $1.3 million interest payment due on Feb. 15, 2021 from
its own funds. About $4.3 million remains in the debt service
reserve accounts.

ESG - Governance: Christian Care has an ESG Relevance Score of '4'
for Management Strategy due to a period of ineffective strategic
planning and execution, which has given rise to multiple years of
operating losses and declining liquidity levels. Management
strategy is relevant to the rating in conjunction with other
factors as the failure to address overdue plant updates, implement
effective marketing strategies and increase pricing have
contributed to the missed principal payment on Feb. 15, 2021.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Rating sensitivities are no longer relevant given Christian Care's
'D' rating.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

CREDIT PROFILE

Christian Care serves the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex with three
senior living campuses in Mesquite, Fort Worth and Allen, Texas.
Aggregate capacity consists of 410 independent living units, 152
assisted living units, 77 memory care units and 119 skilled nursing
beds. Total operating revenue was $36.4 million in 2019.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Christian Care Centers has an ESG Relevance Score of '4' for
Management Strategy due to ineffective strategic planning and
execution by management, which has a negative impact on the rating
in combination with other factors.

Except for the matters discussed above, the highest level of ESG
credit relevance, if present, is a score of 3. This means ESG
issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on
the entity(ies), either due to their nature or to the way in which
they are being managed by the entity(ies).


CICI'S HOLDINGS: Court Okays Entire $9-Million Bankruptcy Loan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie A. Pappas of Bloomberg Law reports that Cici's Holdings Inc.
can tap all $9 million of its bankruptcy loan after a court
overruled a federal watchdog's objection that too much of the
financing was pre-bankruptcy debt.

At a hearing Thursday, Feb. 18, 2021, Judge Stacey G. C. Jernigan
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
found the terms of the financing reasonable in light of the
circumstances of the case.  The ruling follows her Jan. 27, 2021
order approving interim access to $750,000 of the bankruptcy
financing Jan. 27, 2021.

                     About CiCi's Holdings

CiCi's Holdings Inc. is the owner, operator and franchisor of
family-oriented unlimited pizza restaurants.  With 318 locations
across 26 states, including 11 owned restaurants and 307 franchise
locations owned and operated by 128 franchisees, the CiCi's brand
is known as a "go-to" destination for family and other group
outings through its wide variety of pizza, pasta, and salad bar
items and cost-effective price point.

CiCi's Holdings and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 21-30146) on Jan. 25, 2021, with a
restructuring support agreement for a plan that would have lender
D&G Investors LLC take over ownership.  D&G is an affiliate of
private investment firm Gala Capital.

Cici's Holdings was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Stacey G. Jernigan is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Gray Reed & McGRAW LLP as bankruptcy counsel and
Piper Sandler & Co. as investment banker.  Stretto is the claims
agent.



CITIUS PHARMACEUTICALS: Closes $76.5M Registered Direct Offering
----------------------------------------------------------------
Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has closed its previously announced
sale of an aggregate of 50,830,566 shares of its common stock and
accompanying warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 25,415,283
shares of its common stock, at a purchase price of $1.505 per share
and accompanying warrant in a registered direct offering priced
at-the-market under Nasdaq rules.

H.C. Wainwright & Co. acted as the exclusive placement agent for
the offering.

The warrants have an exercise price of $1.70 per share, are
immediately exercisable, and will expire five years from the issue
date.

The aggregate gross proceeds to the Company from the offering are
approximately $76.5 million, before deducting the placement agent
fees and other offering expenses payable by the Company.  Citius
currently intends to use the net proceeds from the offering for
general corporate purposes, including pre-clinical and clinical
development of the Company's product candidates and working capital
and capital expenditures.

                         About Citius

Headquartered in Cranford, NJ, Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. --
http://www.citiuspharma.com-- is a specialty pharmaceutical
company dedicated to the development and commercialization of
critical care products targeting unmet needs with a focus on
anti-infectives, cancer care and unique prescription products.

Citius reported a net loss of $17.55 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $15.56 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$35.31 million in total assets, $9.51 million in total liabilities,
and $25.80 million in total stockholders' equity.

Boston-based Wolf & Company, P.C., the Company's auditor since
2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Dec. 16, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses and negative cash flows from operations and has a
significant accumulated deficit.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


CLEARPOINT CHEMICALS: Creditors Committee Says Plan Inadequate
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in Clearpoint
Chemicals, LLC's case objects to the Disclosure Statement
explaining the Debtor's Plan.

The Committee claims that the Disclosure Statement is inadequate
because it provides scant to no information regarding the assets of
the Debtor, and facts and evidence supporting non-debtor releases
included in the Proposed Chapter 11 Plan.

The Committee points out that there is no clear explanation for how
the new value has been provided by equity and/or why any such new
value is adequate, if allowed at all insofar as the Disclosure
Statement and Plan allude to new value provided by equity or
affiliates of equity and the Debtor.

The Committee says that the Disclosure Statement fails to
adequately disclose the relationships among insiders, including
relationships between and/or among Debtor; Clearpoint Industries,
LLC; Clearpoint Polymers, LLC; Silverback Chemicals, LLC; and
related equity.

The Committee asserts that the Debtor fails to provide any analysis
of the Seaside factors required for approval of such far reaching
and sweeping releases of insiders, affiliates, and/or equity. This
analysis is especially important given potential claims of the
Estate against insiders and equity for preference payments.

The Committee further asserts that the Disclosure Statement
provides no clear disclosures, much less adequate disclosures,
regarding the apparent basis by which equity retains ownership in
the Reorganized Debtor when creditors are not paid in full.

A full-text copy of the Committee's objection dated Feb. 16, 2021,
is available at https://bit.ly/3k1pgEO from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorney for the Creditors' Committee:

     RICHARD M. GAAL
     McDOWELL KNIGHT ROEDDER & SLEDGE, LLC
     Post Office Box 350
     Mobile, Alabama 36601
     Telephone: (251) 432-5300
     Fax: (251) 432-5303
     E-mail: rgaal@mcdowellknight.com

                   About Clearpoint Chemicals

Clearpoint Chemicals, LLC operates in the specialty chemical
services industry.  It develops customer-specific chemical
solutions, provides in-house last-mile logistics, and delivers
on-site application and management, and continued communication and
project assessment services.

Clearpoint Chemicals sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 20-12274) on Sept. 29,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Jerry C. Oldshue oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Silver, Volt & Garrett as its bankruptcy counsel
and R. Tate Young, Esq., an attorney practicing in Houston, as its
special counsel.


CLEARPOINT CHEMICALS: Rocky Mountain Says Disclosures Deficient
---------------------------------------------------------------
Rocky Mountain Transload, Inc. ("RMT") objects to the Disclosure
Statement filed by debtor Clearpoint Chemicals, LLC.

Rocky Mountain states that the Disclosure Statement should be
denied because it fails to provide full and sufficiently detailed
information to permit parties in interest in this case to evaluate
whether to accept or reject the Plan. Rocky Mountain says that the
Disclosure Statement is deficient and further asserts that:

     * The Disclosure Statement fails to detail how the Debtor is
handling its obligations with RMT.

     * The Disclosure Statement fails to detail how the Debtor is
dealing with the storage obligation with RMT.

     * The Disclosure Statement fails to detail what the Debtor is
doing with the hazardous chemicals.  

     * The Disclosure Statement fails to detail how the Debtor will
pay the administrative obligation owing to RMT.

     * The Disclosure Statement fails to detail how the Debtor will
deal with the environmental concerns that arise from the storage of
the chemicals.

A full-text copy of Rocky Mountain's objection dated Feb. 16, 2021,
is available at https://bit.ly/3uelFIg from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Counsel for Rocky Mountain:

     Paul G. Urtz
     Miller & Urtz, LLC
     1660 Lincoln Street, #1420
     Denver, CO 80264
     Telephone: (303) 861-1200
     E-mail: paulurtz@millerurtz.com

                   About Clearpoint Chemicals

Clearpoint Chemicals, LLC operates in the specialty chemical
services industry.  It develops customer-specific chemical
solutions, provides in-house last-mile logistics, and delivers
on-site application and management, and continued communication and
project assessment services.

Clearpoint Chemicals sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 20-12274) on Sept. 29,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Jerry C. Oldshue oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Silver, Volt & Garrett as its bankruptcy counsel
and R. Tate Young, Esq., an attorney practicing in Houston, as its
special counsel.


CLEARPOINT CHEMICALS: UMB Capital Opposes to Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
UMB Capital Finance, a division of UMB Bank, N.A., objects to the
Disclosure Statement filed by debtor Clearpoint Chemicals, LLC.

UMB says that the information in the Disclosure Statement is
inadequate for the following reasons, which are specific to UMB but
have broader impact on the treatment of other creditors and on the
feasibility of the Debtor's Plan of Reorganization:

     * The Disclosure Statement makes reference to the financing
relationship between UMB and the Debtor, but neither the Disclosure
Statement nor the Plan indicates whether the Debtor plans to
continue the UMB relationship on a post-confirmation basis.

     * Other than historical references to UMB in Section 3 of the
Disclosure Statement, nothing in either the Disclosure Statement or
the Plan addresses: the post-confirmation relationship between UMB
and the Debtor; the treatment of UMB's claim; or the assumption or
rejection of the executory financing contracts by and between UMB
and the Debtor.

     * Article 4 of the Disclosure Statement and Article 7 of the
Plan address the assumption and rejection of executory contracts.
UMB's agreements with the Debtor are not identified as being
assumed.

     * UMB has learned that the Debtor wishes to continue financing
its invoices through UMB post-confirmation.  However, nothing in
the Disclosure Statement or the Plan addresses the Debtor's
intention.

     * So as to provide creditors with sufficient information, the
Debtor should make clear and unequivocal disclosures regarding its
intentions with respect to UMB's treatment under the Plan and the
Debtor's post-confirmation financing arrangements with UMB.

A full-text copy of UMB's objection dated Feb. 16, 2021, is
available at https://bit.ly/37sfPZQ from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorneys for UMB Capital:

     MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, P.C.
     Evan N. Parrott
     11 North Water Street
     RSA Battle House Tower
     Suite 24290
     Mobile, AL 36602
     Tel: (251) 432-0001
     E-mail: eparrott@maynardcooper.com

         - and -

     STINSON LLP
     Benjamin J. Court
     50 South Sixth Street
     Suite 2600
     Minneapolis, MN 55402
     (612) 335-1500
     benjamin.court@stinson.com

                   About Clearpoint Chemicals

Clearpoint Chemicals, LLC, operates in the specialty chemical
services industry.  It develops customer-specific chemical
solutions, provides in-house last-mile logistics, and delivers
on-site application and management, and continued communication and
project assessment services.

Clearpoint Chemicals sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 20-12274) on Sept. 29,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Jerry C. Oldshue oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Silver, Volt & Garrett as its bankruptcy counsel
and R. Tate Young, Esq., an attorney practicing in Houston, as its
special counsel.


COMCAR INDUSTRIES: Has $1.62-Mil. Wind-Down Budget
--------------------------------------------------
Comcar Industries, Inc., et al., on Jan. 19, 2021, filed an Amended
Combined Disclosure Statement and Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation.

A hearing to consider the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement on a
final basis and confirmation of the Plan will be held on March 10,
2021, at 10 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time) before the Honorable
Laurie Selber Silverstein.

The Plan provides for the creation of a post-confirmation
Liquidating Trust to hold and administer certain Liquidating Trust
Assets, and distribute the proceeds therefrom to the Holders of
certain Allowed Claims.

In advance of the hearing on confirmation of the Plan, the Debtors
filed a plan supplement, containing a form of liquidating trust
agreement, a form of wind-down trust agreement and the wind-down
budget.

The Wind-Down Budget provides:

       Wind-Down Items                             Amount
       ---------------                             ------
Cherry Bekaert Fees                               $95,000
Wind Down Trust Tax Returns                        40,000
Tax Contractor Assistance                          10,000
Iron Mountain Document Retention/
   Destruction Est.                                96,000
Final MOR Cost (FTI and RGP)                       25,000
Wind Down Trustee Estimated Fees                  250,000
Counsel Estimated Fees                            200,000
Insurance                                          20,000
FranchiseTaxes                                    110,000
Property Taxes                                    125,000
Other Costs                                       150,000
Est. 503(b)(9)/Priority/Priority Tax Claims       500,000
                                                ---------
        Total                                   1,621,000

A copy of the Plan Supplement filed Feb. 19, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3bnRF41

                     About Comcar Industries

Comcar Industries -- https://comcar.com/ -- is a transportation and
logistics company headquartered in Auburndale, Fla., with over 40
strategically-located terminal and satellite locations across the
United States.  

On May 17, 2020, Comcar Industries and related entities sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-11120).  In
the petitions signed by CRO Andrew Hinkelman, Comcar Industries was
estimated to have $50 million to $100 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the presiding judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel, FTI Consulting,
Inc. as financial advisor; and Bluejay Advisors, LLC as investment
banker.  Donlin Recano & Company, Inc. is the claims agent.

                          *    *    *

On June 25, 2020, the Bankruptcy Court entered orders authorizing
the Debtors to (i) sell substantially all of the assets of CT to
Bulk Transport Company, East, Inc., (ii) sell substantially all of
the assets of CTL to Adams Resources & Energy, Inc., and Service
Transport Company, and (iii) sell the MCT assets to Contract
Freighters, Inc.  On Sept. 4, 2020, the Court entered an order
authorizing the sale of substantially all of CCC's assets to Bulk
Transport Company East, Inc.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: Board Elects Kevin Hammons as President, CFO
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Community Health Systems, Inc. elected
and appointed Kevin J. Hammons, 55, to the position of president
and chief financial officer of the Company.

Mr. Hammons previously served as executive vice president and chief
financial officer of the Company.

The Company did not enter into or amend any compensatory or other
plan, contract or arrangement with Mr. Hammons in connection with
his appointment.

                      Compensation Arrangements

On Feb. 16, 2021, the Board, upon recommendation of the
Compensation Committee of the Board, met and approved the following
compensation arrangements for 2021 for the Company's named
executive officers, as reflected in the Company's definitive proxy
statement for its 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.

2021 Cash Incentive Compensation

The Board approved performance goals for the Named Executive
Officers for fiscal year 2021 under the Company's 2019 Employee
Performance Incentive Plan with target opportunities as follows
(expressed as a percentage of base salary):

  Name and Position                             Target Opportunity
  -----------------                             ------------------

  Wayne T. Smith,                                      225%
  Executive Chairman of the
  Board of Directors

  Tim L. Hingtgen                                      225%
  Chief Executive Officer

  Kevin J. Hammons                                     125%
  President and Chief Financial Officer

  Lynn T. Simon, M.D.                                  115%
  President of Clinical Operations and
  Chief Medical Officer

  Benjamin C. Fordham                                  115%
  Executive Vice President,
  General Counsel and Assistant Secretary

In addition, each Named Executive Officer will have the opportunity
to achieve an additional percentage of his or her base salary for
the attainment of specific non-financial performance improvements
up to a maximum of an additional 40% for Mr. Smith and Mr.
Hingtgen; 25% for Mr. Hammons; and 10% for Dr. Simon and Mr.
Fordham.  Each Named Executive Officer will also have the
opportunity to achieve an additional percentage of his or her base
salary for overachievement of Company-level goals up to a maximum
of an additional 35% for Mr. Smith and Mr. Hingtgen, and an
additional 25% for Mr. Hammons, Dr. Simon and Mr. Fordham.

The payments made to the Company's 2020 named executive officers
under the Cash Incentive Plan in respect of fiscal 2020 incentive
compensation targets will be set forth in the definitive proxy
statement to be filed by the Company in connection with the
Company's 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.

2021 Base Salaries

The Board approved the following base salary amounts for the Named
Executive Officers for fiscal year 2021:

  Name and Position                                2021 Base
Salary
  -----------------                               
----------------
  Wayne T. Smith                                      $1,000,000
  Executive Chairman of the
  Board of Directors

  Tim L. Hingtgen, Chief Executive Officer            $1,200,000

  Kevin J. Hammons,                                     $700,000
  President and Chief Financial Officer

  Lynn T. Simon, M.D.                                   $625,000
  President of Clinical Operations and
  Chief Medical Officer

  Benjamin C. Fordham                                   $625,000
  Executive Vice President,
  General Counsel and
  Assistant Secretary

Long-Term Incentive Compensation – Equity Awards

Pursuant to the Company's Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Option
and Award Plan, the Board approved the following equity grants to
the Named Executive Officers, effective March 1, 2021:

                                                      
Performance-
                         Non-Qualified   Time Vesting     Based
                         Stock Options    Restricted   Restricted
   Name                                      Stock         Stock
   ----                  -------------    -----------  -----------
   Wayne T. Smith           90,000           90,000      180,000
   Tim L. Hingtgen         100,000          100,000      200,000
   Kevin J. Hammons         75,000           75,000      150,000
   Lynn T. Simon, M.D.      40,000           40,000       80,000
   Benjamin C. Fordham      26,250           26,250       52,500

The number of performance-based restricted shares granted to each
Named Executive Officer is subject to the attainment of certain
performance objectives during the three-year period beginning
Jan. 1, 2021 and ending Dec. 31, 2023, with the ultimate number of
shares vesting in respect of such awards after such three-year
period ranging from 0% to 200% of the shares set forth above based
on the level of achievement of such performance objectives.

Both the non-qualified stock options and the time-vesting
restricted stock vest ratably over three years, beginning on the
first anniversary of the grant date.

                   About Community Health Systems Inc.

Community Health Systems, Inc. -- http://www.chs.net-- is a
publicly traded hospital company and an operator of general acute
care hospitals in communities across the country.  The Company,
through its subsidiaries, owns, leases or operates 85 affiliated
hospitals in 16 states with an aggregate of approximately 14,000
licensed beds.  The Company's headquarters are located in Franklin,
Tennessee, a suburb south of Nashville.  Shares in Community Health
Systems, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol "CYH."

Community Health reported net income attributable to the Company's
stockholders of $511 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2020,
compared to a net loss attributable to the Company's stockholders
of $675 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31,
2020, the Company had $16.01 billion in total assets, $17.06
billion in total liabilities, $484 million in redeemable
noncontrolling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.54 billion.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Dec. 29, 2020, S&P Global Ratings raised
its issuer credit rating on Community Health Systems Inc. to 'CCC+'
from 'SD' (selective default) and raised its rating on the
company's unsecured debt due 2028 to 'CCC-' from 'D'.  S&P said the
company's recent financial transactions have improved its maturity
profile and lowered interest costs.

In November 2020, Fitch Ratings affirmed the Long-Term Issuer
Default Ratings (IDR) of Community Health Systems, Inc. (CHS) and
subsidiary CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc. at 'CCC'.


COMMUNITY INTERVENTION: $11.85M Sale of All Futures Assets Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Elizabeth D. Katz of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts authorized Community Intervention
Services, Inc., South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc., and Futures
Behavior Therapy Center, LLC, to sell substantially all of Futures'
assets that it utilized in operating its assets, to FBTC
Transitional Sub, LL or its eligible designee for $11.85 million,
subject to certain adjustments.

The Sale Hearing via Zoom was held on Feb. 16, 2021, at 12:30 p.m.

The Debtor designated the bid of Little Leaves Early Learning
Therapy and Program, Inc. as the second best offer to acquire the
Assets, which Back-Up Bid is embodied in Back-Up Bidder's
pre-Auction asset purchase agreement constituting its initial
Qualified Bid as deemed modified to reflect the Back-Up Bidder's
last Auction bid of $12.1 million.  

The Sale to the Winning Bidder pursuant to the APA is authorized
under Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Assets (including
the Assumed Contracts) will be transferred to the Winning Bidder
upon and as of the Closing and such transfer will constitute a
legal, valid, binding and effective transfer of such Assets and,
upon the Debtor's receipt of the Purchase Price, will be free and
clear of all Encumbrances, except for the Assumed Obligations and
Permitted Liens under the APA.  Upon the Closing, the Winning
Bidder will take title to and possession of the Assets subject only
to the Assumed Obligations and Permitted Liens.

Upon the Closing Date, and except as otherwise provided in the
Order or in the APA, the Winning Bidder will not bear liability for
any liability or other obligation of the Debtor arising under or
related to any of the Assets.  

Subject to and conditioned on the Closing, the Debtor is authorized
pursuant to Section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code to assume and
assign the Assumed Contracts to the Winning Bidder.

The proceeds of the Sale will be paid on the Closing Date for
distribution as follows: (i) first, the Winning Bidder will pay the
Payment Amount to those certain individual or entities identified
on the Payment Schedule, (ii) second, the Winning Bidder will pay
the D&P Escrow Amount (or, if and to the extent approved by the
Court prior to the Closing Date, the D&P Fee), and (iii) third, the
remaining proceeds from the Sale will be remitted at the Closing to
Agent in partial satisfaction of the Prepetition Secured Parties'
secured claims, which are described more fully in the Final Cash
Collateral Order and Agent's Proof of Claim.

The Debtor and the Winning Bidder may request, and upon reasonable
request the Court will enter, a Confirmatory Order, confirming the
authorized sale of any specified Assets to the Winning Bidder
pursuant to the APA and the Order, or otherwise clarifying or
confirming with particularity any matter addressed by the Order,
including without limitation as may be reasonably necessary or
desired for purposes of establishing or recording evidence of title
to specific Assets.

The Order is a final order and is enforceable upon entry and to the
extent necessary under Bankruptcy Rules 5003, 9014, 9021, and 9022.
The Court expressly finds that there is no just reason for delay
in the implementation of the Order and expressly directs entry of
judgment as set forth herein and the stays imposed by Bankruptcy
Rules 6004(h), 6006(d), and 7062 are modified and will not apply to
the Order or to the transactions contemplated by the APA.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/1642jl4a from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                About Community Intervention
                      Services, Inc.

Community Intervention Services, Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 21-40002­EDK).  The case is being
jointly administered with the bankruptcy cases of its affilliates
Community Intervention Services Holdings, Inc., Futures Behavior
Therapy Center, LLC, and South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.



COMMUNITY INTERVENTION: To Submit Proposed Order on Sale of Assets
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Elizabeth D. Katz of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts ordered the Counsel to Community
Intervention Services, Inc., South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.,
and Futures Behavior Therapy Center, LLC, to submit a proposed
order granting the Debtors' sale of substantially all of Futures'
assets it utilized in operating its assets, to FBTC Transitional
Sub, LL or its eligible designee for $7.5 million, subject to
certain adjustments, free and clear or liens, claims, and
interests, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Feb. 16, 2021.  The Motion is
granted.  The Counsel will submit the proposed order to
EDK@mab.uscourts.gov, in Word format, memorializing the remarks
made during the hearing held.

                About Community Intervention
                      Services, Inc.

Community Intervention Services, Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 21-40002­EDK).  The case is being
jointly administered with the bankruptcy cases of its affilliates
Community Intervention Services Holdings, Inc., Futures Behavior
Therapy Center, LLC, and South Bay Mental Health Center, Inc.



COMSTOCK RESOURCES: Fitch Rates Eight-Year Unsecured Notes 'B+'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'B+'/'RR3' rating to Comstock
Resources Inc.'s (CRK) eight-year senior unsecured notes. Proceeds
are intended to refinance a portion of the senior unsecured notes
due 2025 and 2026. The rating Outlook is Positive.

Comstock's rating reflects the company's position as the largest
producer of natural gas in the Haynesville Shale Basin, its
industry low operating and drilling cost structure, the company's
ability to generate positive FCF under base and strip pricing
assumptions, relatively low differentials due to its proximity to
the Henry Hub and its deep drilling inventory. In addition, CRK
took actions in 2020 to materially enhance liquidity by refinancing
revolver borrowings. This is offset by the company's modestly
higher leverage relative and less robust hedging program relative
to its peers.

The Positive Outlook reflects Fitch's expectation of positive FCF,
which would be applied to reduce debt and lead to improved credit
metrics over the next 12-18 months.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Low Cost Operator: Comstock has one of the lowest operating cost
structures among its natural gas peers due to its low lease
operating costs and gathering and transportation costs. Fitch
believes the company's scale in the Haynesville will allow CRK to
further reduce gathering and transportation costs as current
contracts lapse. In addition, margins are similar to some of the
best Permian oil-based operators, as CRK's proximity to Henry Hub
allows the company to achieve minimal differentials and premium
pricing for its natural gas. Drilling costs have also declined over
time as the company has achieved scale through acquisitions. Fitch
anticipates further drilling cost reductions in the current low
commodity price environment.

Improving Liquidity: Comstock issued $800 million of senior
unsecured notes in 2020 and used proceeds primarily to refinance
bank debt. Overall liquidity improved to $930 million from $166
million and usage on the revolver was reduced to 36% from 89%. The
proposed note issuance helps to materially address unsecured
maturities in 2025 and 2026, which combined with additional
refinancings, should help to extend the maturity of the revolver
that is due in 2024.

Largest Haynesville Producer: Following the acquisition of Covey
Park in 2019, Comstock is now the largest producer in the
Haynesville shale basin. The scale provides for significantly lower
operating, gathering and transportation, and drilling costs. The
Haynesville is located close to the Henry Hub and other major
natural gas buyers, which provides for lower differentials and
higher realized gas prices. Comstock has approximately 1,953 net
drilling locations in the Haynesville with 73% of the locations
with laterals greater than 5,000 feet. Approximately 93% of the
acreage is held by production, and the company operates 91% of its
position. The basin also benefits from favorable differentials
owing to its proximity to the Henry Hub and Gulf Coast, lower
midstream costs and deep inventory.

FCF Despite Low Prices: Fitch believes Comstock can generate FCF in
its Base and Strip case scenarios, which reflect historically low
commodity prices, given its low operating and drilling cost
structure. The company is currently operating six rigs, down from
nine upon closing the Covey Park acquisition, with 2021
developmental capex expected in the $510 million-$550 million range
leading to low single-digit growth over the next several years.
Fitch believes this number is conservative given that oilfield
service costs are rapidly declining as those providers are
scrambling for business. The certainty of the FCF over the next two
years is enhanced by the company's hedging program.

Solid Hedging Program: Comstock aims to hedge approximately 50%-60%
of its forward 12-month gas production. The company has hedged
approximately 65% of its 2021 expected production at an average
price floor of $2.51 with 39% of its 2021 hedges in the form of
collars.

Preferred No Equity Credit: Fitch does not apply its Corporate
Hybrids Treatment and Notching Criteria as the new preferred stock
will be held by existing equity investors, or affiliates. Instead,
Fitch uses its Corporate Rating Criteria on applying equity credit
for shareholder and affiliated loans. The preferred stock contains
a provision for a mandatory cash redemption upon a change of
control. As a result, Fitch is not allowing equity credit for the
preferred stock.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Base case West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil prices of $42 in
    2021, $47 in 2022, and long-term price of $50;

-- Base case Henry Hub natural gas price of $1.85 in 2020, $2.45
    in 2021, $2.45 in 2022, and long-term price of $2.45;

-- Production growth of 11% in 2021 and mid-single digit growth
    throughout the forecasted period;

-- Five to six-rig program resulting in capex of $543 million in
    2021. Capex increasing to approximately $600 million for the
    remainder of the forecasted period;

-- No incremental acquisitions, divestitures or equity issuance.
    Any FCF is assumed to be used to reduce debt. Fitch expects
    the company to be a consolidator but is not projecting any
    acquisitions given current industry and capital markets
    environment.

RECOVERY ASSUMPTIONS:

The recovery analysis assumes that Comstock Resources would be
reorganized as a going-concern in bankruptcy rather than
liquidated.

Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim.

Going-Concern (GC) Approach

Comstock's GC EBITDA assumptions reflects Fitch's projections under
a stressed case price deck, which assumes Henry Hub natural gas
prices of USD1.65 in 2021, USD2.00 in 2022 and USD2.25 in 2023.

The GC EBITDA estimate reflects Fitch's view of a sustainable,
post-reorganization EBITDA level upon which Fitch bases the
enterprise valuation (EV). The GC EBITDA assumption uses 2023
EBITDA, which reflects the decline from current pricing levels to
stressed levels and then a partial recovery coming out of a
troughed pricing environment.

The model was adjusted for reduced production and varying
differentials given the material decline in the prices from the
previous price deck.

An EV multiple of 3.75x EBITDA is applied to the GC EBITDA to
calculate a post-reorganization enterprise value. The choice of the
multiple considered the following factors:

-- The historical case study exit multiples for peer companies
    ranged from 2.8x-7.0x, with an average of 5.6x and median of
    6.1x;

-- Comstock's $2.2 billion acquisition of Covey in 2019 had an
    approximate EBITDA multiple of 4.0x. Given that Comstock is
    the only consolidator in the basin, Fitch believes higher
    multiples are unlikely;

-- No value is assigned for the Bakken assets as there are no
    plans for further drilling and the wells are being run down.

Liquidation Approach

The liquidation estimate reflects Fitch's view of the value of
balance sheet assets that can be realized in sale or liquidation
processes conducted during a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding
and distributed to creditors.

Fitch considers valuations such as SEC PV-10 and M&A transactions
for each basin including multiples for production per flowing
barrel, proved reserves valuation, value per acre and value per
drilling location.

The senior secured revolver is expected to be fully drawn given the
current draw. The revolver is senior to the senior unsecured bonds
in the waterfall.

The allocation of value in the liability waterfall results in
recovery corresponding to 'RR1' recover for the senior secured
revolver ($1.4 billion) and a recovery corresponding to 'RR3' for
the senior unsecured notes ($2.3 billion pro forma for the notes
offering).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Executable plan to enhance liquidity greater than $500 million
    through application of FCF, asset sales or equity to reduce
    the revolver;

-- Demonstrated execution of generating positive FCF;

-- FFO increasing above $850 million;

-- Mid-cycle Gross Debt/EBITDA below 3.0x.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- A change in terms of financial policy that is debt holder
    unfriendly, including not applying a material portion of FCF
    to debt reduction;

-- Inability to enhance liquidity over next 12-18 months;

-- Material reduction in the borrowing base that further limits
    liquidity.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Improving Liquidity and Runway: Comstock had $30 million of cash on
hand and availability under its $1.4 billion revolver of $900
million as of Dec. 31, 2020. In addition, Fitch anticipates the
company will generate positive FCF over the next several years,
with proceeds to be used to further reduce the revolver. Comstock's
next maturity is the revolver in 2024, followed by two senior note
maturities with $244 million due in 2025 and $1,326 million due in
2026 with both amounts pro forma for the note issuance.

The revolver has two financial covenants: a leverage ratio of less
than 4.0:1.0 and a current ratio of at least 1.0:1.0. The company
complied with both as of Dec. 31, 2020.

Although Comstock has been acquisitive, the financing structure of
the acquisitions has been conservative with strong equity
components to lighten the debt load. Fitch's expectation is that
Comstock will continue to be a consolidator of the Haynesville
basin but will limit the leverage component given the lack of
access to debt capital markets and material draw on the revolver.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


COMSTOCK RESOURCES: S&P Assigns 'B' Rating on New Sr. Unsec. Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level rating and '4'
recovery rating to U.S.-based natural gas producer Comstock
Resources Inc.'s new senior unsecured debt offering. The '4'
recovery rating indicates its expectation for average (30%-50%;
rounded estimate: 40%) recovery in the event of a default.

S&P said, "We expect the company will primarily use the proceeds
from this offering to fund a tender for a portion of its existing
notes due 2025 and 2026 (with priority given to the shorter-dated
paper). The refinancing will reduce Comstock's cost of debt capital
and extend part of its maturity profile to 2029. We do not expect
the transactions to materially affect our forecast financial
metrics for Comstock, thus our 'B' issuer credit rating and stable
outlook on the company are unchanged."



CONTINENTAL COIFFURES: Amended Small Business Plan Due March 19
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the chapter 11 case of Continental Coiffures Ltd., a
Confirmation Hearing was held on the Chapter 11 Sub-Chapter V Plan
dated Dec. 28, 2021, and the Objection filed by Sub-Chapter V
Trustee on Feb. 18, 2021.

On Feb. 19, 2021, Judge Gregory L. Taddonio ordered that:

   (1) The Plan Confirmation Hearing on Debtor's Chapter 11
subchapter V plan is CONTINUED to April 1, 2021, at 11:00 a.m. via
Zoom.

   (2) On or before March 19, 2021, the Debtor will file an Amended
Chapter 11 Plan.

            About Continental Coiffures Ltd.

Continental Coiffures, Ltd., a McMurray, Pa.-based hair and styling
salon company, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 20-22808) on Sept. 29, 2020.

At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed $100,001 and $500,000
in both assets and liabilities.

Jackson Kelly PLLC and Colleran & Company, CPA PC serve as the
Debtor's legal counsel and accountant, respectively.


CORNUS MONTESSORI: Seeks to Hire RoganMillerZimmerman as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Cornus Montessori, LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to hire
RoganMillerZimmerman, PLLC as its legal counsel.

The firm's services include:

     (a) preparing and filing the Debtor's schedules, statements of
financial affairs, motions and other pleadings required in its
Chapter 11 case;
   
     (b) advising the Debtor as to its responsibilities under the
Bankruptcy Code;

     (c) evaluating and preparing a plan of reorganization;

     (d) negotiating with creditors with respect to the Debtor's
reorganization efforts;

     (e) evaluating and, to the extent necessary, objecting to the
various claims against the Debtor's estate;

     (f) reviewing and preparing monthly reports; and,

     (g) other legal services necessary to administer the Debtor's
estate.

The firm received an initial retainer in the amount of $30,000.

Christopher Rogan, Esq., a principal at Roganmillerzimmerman, will
lead the firm in the Chapter 11 proceedings. He will charge $425 an
hour for his services.

Mr. Rogan disclosed in a court filing that his firm is
"disinterested" as that term is defined in Section 101(41) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Christopher L. Rogan, Esq.
     Rogan Miller Zimmerman, PLLC
     50 Catoctin Cir NE #333
     Leesburg, VA 20176
     Phone: +1 703-777-8850
     Fax: (703) 777-8854
     Email: crogan@RMZLawFirm.com

                      About Cornus Montessori

Cornus Montessori owns a Montessori school and daycare business in
Chantilly, Va.

Cornus Montessori sought protection for relief under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case no. 21-10213) on Feb. 11,
2021, listing $50,000 in assets and $100,001 to $500,000 in
liabilities.  Christopher L. Rogan, Esq. at Roganmillerzimmerman,
PLLC, serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


COTY INC: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa1 CFR
----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Coty Inc. and other ratings that are associated with the
same analytical unit. The review was conducted through a portfolio
review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in which Moody's
reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the context of the
relevant principal methodology(ies), recent developments, and a
comparison of the financial and operating profile to similarly
rated peers. The review did not involve a rating committee. Since
January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been to issue a press release
following each periodic review to announce its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Coty's Caa1 Corporate Family Rating reflects high financial
leverage and weak free cash flow, continued weak demand in the
company's consumer beauty products, concentration in volatile
fragrance and color cosmetic categories, a need for constant
innovation driven by portfolio composition, and a global
diversification that is skewed toward slower growth mature
developed markets. These factors have been exasperated by store
closures, reduced store traffic and weak demand amid the
coronavirus pandemic. The company's rating is supported by its
large scale, its well-recognized brands in several beauty
categories, and a strong public commitment to reducing net leverage
to near 5.0x.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


CRED INC: Former CFO Fights Court Ruling to Keep Chapter 11 Alive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that the former chief financial officer (CFO) of
bankrupt cryptocurrency investment firm Cred Inc. on Feb. 19, 2021,
told a Delaware bankruptcy court he will appeal both an order
blocking him from transferring cryptocurrency and the denial of his
motion to dismiss part of the Chapter 11 case.

James Alexander filed a notice of appeal with the court saying he
intends to challenge U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge John Dorsey's
decisions to reject his claim to be the sole person authorized to
take a Cred subsidiary into Chapter 11 and grant a request by the
unsecured creditors' committee for a restraining order barring him
from transferring cryptocurrency.

                         About Cred Inc.

Cred Inc. is a cryptocurrency platform that accepts loans of
cryptocurrency from non-U.S. persons and pays interest on those
loans. Cred -- https://mycred.io -- is a global financial services
platform serving customers in over 100 countries.  Cred is a
licensed lender and allows some borrowers to earn a yield on
cryptocurrency pledged as collateral.

Cred Inc. and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-12836) on Nov. 7, 2020.  Cred was
estimated to have assets of $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities of $100 million to $500 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped Paul Hastings LLP as their bankruptcy counsel,
Cousins Law LLC as local counsel, and MACCO Restructuring Group,
LLC as financial advisor.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., is the
claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases on Dec. 3,
2020. The committee tapped McDermott Will & Emery LLLP as counsel
and Dundon Advisers LLC as financial advisor.



CRED INC: Quinn Emanuel Agrees to Return Most of $350,000 Fees
--------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP has
agreed to return most of a $350,000 postpetition payment by
bankrupt cryptocurrency venture Cred Inc., originally reported as
having been issued as legal fee advancements for the debtor's
former general counsel.

Under the agreement reached between the law firm, Cred and its
official committee of unsecured creditors, Quinn will retain
$33,500.  Along with the return, the parties agreed to releases of
claims and a reservation of rights regarding claims or potential
actions against the former counsel, Daniel F. Wheeler.

                        About Cred Inc.

Cred Inc. is a cryptocurrency platform that accepts loans of
cryptocurrency from non-U.S. persons and pays interest on those
loans.  Cred -- https://www.mycred.io/ -- is a global financial
services platform serving customers in over 100 countries.  Cred is
a licensed lender and allows some borrowers to earn a yield on
cryptocurrency pledged as collateral.

Cred Inc. and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-12836) on Nov. 7, 2020.  Cred was
estimated to have assets of $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities of $100 million to $500 million as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped Paul Hastings LLP as their bankruptcy counsel,
Cousins Law LLC as local counsel, and MACCO Restructuring Group,
LLC, as financial advisor.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., is the
claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases on Dec. 3,
2020.  The committee tapped McDermott Will & Emery LLP as counsel,
and Dundon Advisers LLC as financial advisor.


D.W. TRIM: May Use Cash Collateral Use Thru March 30
----------------------------------------------------
Judge Mark Houle of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, Riverside Division, granted, in part, D.W.
Trim, Inc.'s motion to use cash collateral on an interim basis.

The Debtor is authorized to use Cash Collateral for the period from
February 15, 2021, through March 30, 2021, pursuant to the terms of
a budget.  The Debtor is authorized to deviate from the amounts set
forth in the budget as follows: As to any category with spending
projected to be over $2,000, the Debtor may deviate from the budget
by as much as 15% per week and without notice to the secured
creditors.  As to any category with spending projected to be under
$2,000, the Debtor may deviate from the budget by as much as 20%
per week and without notice to the secured creditors.

The Debtor has identified entities as asserting interests in the
cash collateral, including the U.S. Small Business Administration.
Should the Debtor believe it necessary to exceed the approved
amounts by a greater percentage, the Debtor will need to obtain
approval from the SBA only of the proposed variance. If it does not
object to the variance within 48 business hours, then the variance
will be deemed approved. If the SBA does not approve the proposed
variance, then the Debtor may request a hearing on shortened notice
regarding the proposed variance.

The Debtor may rollover unused costs of goods sold only (and for no
other expense category) on a two-week rolling basis by as much as
$40,000 per week, or as much as $80,000 in total.  For the interim
period, the request to approve excess gross revenues to costs of
goods sold is denied without prejudice to the Debtor renewing the
request at future hearings.

As further adequate protection, the secured creditors are granted
replacement liens in all post-petition assets of the Debtor, other
than avoidance power actions and recoveries.  The replacement liens
granted to the secured creditors here shall have the same extent,
validity and priority (and shall be subject to the same defenses)
as were their respective liens and security interests in
prepetition collateral.

The replacement liens provided shall be deemed valid and perfected
with the priority as provided in the Interim Order, without any
further notice or act by any party that may otherwise be required
under any law.

The Interim Order does not affect the power of any
party-in-interest to challenge the validity, extent, amount, or
nature of the liens, recorded in favor of the secured creditors.

The continued hearing will be held on March 30, 2021, at 2 p.m. in
Courtroom 303, of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Riverside Division.
The hearing will be held remotely and interested parties should
check the Court's website for instructions on how to appear
remotely.

The last day for the Debtor to serve and file a supplement to the
Motion, including any revised budget for use of cash collateral, is
March 2. The revised budget shall contain a breakdown of costs of
goods sold.

Any written opposition must be filed not later than March 16.

The Debtor may file a reply not later than March 23rd and may
include revised financial reports on the Debtor's financial
condition.

The Debtor is authorized to operate its business in the ordinary
course of business.

A copy of the Interim Order is available at https://bit.ly/3qGCDN3
from PacerMonitor.com.

                    About D.W. Trim, Inc.

Riverside, California-based D.W. Trim, Inc. provides labor and
materials as a finish carpentry sub-contractor on tract home
projects, largely in the Inland Empire.  It was incorporated in
2008 and operates its business from a leased office location.

Prior to 2008, its principal, Christopher S. De Mint, had worked in
the same line of work after a short period of time in college. Its
primary focus in construction is on doors and mouldings (crown
molding, door casing, baseboards), decorative wall wood treatment,
door hardware, bathroom hardware like bars and medicine cabinets,
closet shelving. The firm's work is in tract single family
residences and not often in other type of construction, e.g.
apartments and condominiums.

DW employs approximately 19 full-time employees in the field at
construction sites, 6 mill employees who cut and package materials
for jobs and 9 people in administration, project management and in
management.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10758) on February
15, 2021. In the petition signed by Christopher S. De Mint, as
president, the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both assets
and liabilities.

THE FOX LAW CORPORATION, INC. is the Debtor's counsel.



DANNY R BARTEL: Can Use Cash Collateral Until Feb. 25
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
authorized Danny R. Bartel, M.D., P.A. to use cash collateral on an
interim basis until February 25, 2021.

The Debtor may use the alleged cash collateral of Fidelity Bank to
pay the budgeted items under the approved 15-Day Budget, with the
exception of payments in relation to the category "Legal &
Accounting", which payments are subject to court-approved
employment of professionals and court approval for the payment of
professionals.

The Debtor's 15-Day Budget provided for total expenses in the
amount of $64,043.51, while its 90-Day Budget provided for total
expenses in the amount of $404,137.06.

As adequate protection of Fidelity Bank's alleged interest in cash
collateral, Fidelity Bank was granted a replacement lien in all
existing and after-acquired equipment, inventory and accounts
receivable of the Debtor to the extent of the diminution in the
value of Fidelity Bank's interest in cash collateral resulting from
the Debtor's use of cash collateral.

The final hearing on the Debtor's motion to use cash collateral is
scheduled on February 24, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.

                About Danny R. Bartel, M.D., P.A.

Danny R. Bartel, M.D., P.A. is a corporation located at 1722 Ninth
Street, Wichita Falls, Texas.  The Debtor filed its voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 on February 9, 2021 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case
No. 21-40285).  The petition was signed by its President, Danny R.
Bartel.  In its Petition, the Debtor estimated its assets at $0 to
$50,0000 and liabilities at $50,001 to $100,000.

The Debtor is represented by Craig D. Davis, Esq., at Davis, Ermis
& Roberts, P.C.


DELL TECHNOLOGIES: Fitch Assigns 'BB+' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings for Dell Technologies, Inc.
and its wholly owned subsidiaries, including the Long-Term Issuer
Default Ratings (IDR) at 'BB+'. Fitch has also revised the Rating
Outlook to Stable from Negative. Fitch's actions affect $54.9
billion of total debt, including the undrawn $4.5 billion
first-lien senior secured revolving credit facility (RCF).

The ratings and Outlook reflect Dell's strengthened credit profile,
driven by better than expected operating performance enabling
achievement of its debt-reduction targets in each of the past two
fiscal years. Fitch believes Dell ended the fiscal year with core
leverage (core debt to core EBITDA) below 3.5x and is positioned to
trigger Fitch's positive 3.0x core leverage rating sensitivity in
the near term if Dell remains focused on using substantially all
cash flow for permanent debt reduction. This view excludes likely
significant debt reduction in connection with a potential spinoff
of VMware, Inc.

Fitch expects modest positive revenue growth on average and over
the long term for Dell, excluding VMware. Share consolidation and
peripherals penetration will drive personal computer (PC) growth,
while Dell's large and diversified installed base will moderate
cyclical on-premise infrastructure spending growth. Fitch expects
stronger than previously forecasted operating performance over the
near term, driven by a continuation of coronavirus-driven momentum
in PCs through 1H22 and recovering infrastructure spending
beginning in 2H22.

Fitch expects Dell's profitability and cash flow will moderate from
record fiscal 2Q21 and 3Q21 levels, with lower operating expenses
and savings initiatives related to the coronavirus normalizing and
offsetting the resumption of growth in Dell's higher margin
infrastructure businesses. Fitch forecasts Dell's FCF adjusted for
the change in finance receivables (excluding VMware) for fiscal
2021 was roughly flat from fiscal 2020 at $4.5 billion. This should
also moderate to the $3 billion-$4 billion range through the
forecast period, but should provide ample capacity for substantial
incremental debt reduction.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Deleveraging Remains Focus: Following two consecutive years of more
than $5 billion of targeted debt reduction, Dell's previously
articulated goal of achieving investment grade (IG) ratings implies
further deleveraging through at least some debt reduction. Fitch
forecasts $3 billion-$4 billion of Dell adjusted FCF (excluding
VMware), providing capacity to meet a portion of the company's
roughly $1.5 billion of debt maturities in fiscal 2022. Fitch also
anticipates any contemplated spinoff transaction would be
accompanied by a dividend sufficient to ensure IG capital
structures for both Dell and VMware.

PC Outperformance: Fitch expects Dell, along with other top-three
PC makers, continuing to take market share from increasingly
subscale players as core to Dell's intermediate- to long-term PC
growth opportunity. Strengthening sales mix and increasing
penetration of peripherals should also enable Dell to outgrow the
broader market, despite reaching the end of the Win10 PC refresh
cycle. Fitch nonetheless forecasts moderating revenue growth in
Dell's PC business following significant outperformance in fiscal
2021, driven by work-from-home dynamics related to the
coronavirus.

Secular ISG Headwinds: Fitch expects the ongoing consolidation of
hardware spending by service providers should result in mature and
cyclical growth rates for small- to medium-size business (SMB) and
enterprise spending, and thus for Dell's infrastructure solutions
group (ISG). Dell's large and diversified installed base should
enable modest revenue growth on average, assuming execution on
product roadmaps and go-to-market strategies. ISG should begin
recovering in fiscal 2022 following two consecutive years of
midsingle-digit negative revenue growth as customers digested
robust U.S. tax reform-fueled spending during fiscal 2020 and were
constrained by the coronavirus in fiscal 2021.

Moderating Profitability: Fitch forecasts moderating profitability
for standalone Dell due to the normalization of operating expenses
following lower variable costs and expense-reduction steps taken at
the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic. Fitch expects core
EBITDA margins for standalone Dell to decline from a
Fitch-estimated 9.4% in fiscal 2021, but to remain in the high
single digits with the alleviation of supply constraints and
recovering infrastructure sales, which carry higher operating
income margins than PCs, in the second half of fiscal 2022.

Continued VMware Strength: Fitch expects a continuation of strong
operating performance from VMware, driven by robust adoption of the
company's full infrastructure stack solutions and growing mix of
recurring revenue and cash flow. Software-as-a-service and support
revenue increased to three-quarters of the total in fiscal 2021, up
from just half roughly a year ago. After stronger than expected
coronavirus-driven organic revenue growth in fiscal 2021, VMware
should grow by mid to high single digits overall and generate
nearly $3 billion of annual FCF by leveraging the company's large
and diversified installed base.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Dell's 'BB+' rating reflects the company's flexibility to meet
aggressive debt-reduction targets on its deleveraging path, with
more than $4 billion of adjusted FCF forecast for fiscal 2021. The
rating also reflects the company's leadership positions in PCs,
which should enable the company and its market-leading peers to
grow via share gains from increasingly subscale competitors.
Finally, the rating also considers Dell's significant installed
base in SMBs through legacy Dell and large enterprises via its
acquisition of EMC Corp., which enabled, among other things, strong
cross-selling execution across Dell, VMware and Dell's captive
finance unit Dell Financial Services (DFS). These factors position
Dell's business profile in line with higher rated IT hardware
providers, such as Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
(BBB+/Negative). Dell's financial structure strengthened
considerably, but remains less conservative than those of
competitors.

Fitch also assesses the linkage between Dell and 80.4% owned VMware
as moderate under Fitch's parent-subsidiary linkage criteria, and
therefore equalizes the companies' Long-Term IDRs. VMware is an
unrestricted subsidiary in Dell's credit agreements and indentures,
and provides for no upstream guarantees, cross-default provisions,
or management or Treasury team overlap. While VMware has an
independent related party transaction committee in place, Fitch
believes the special dividend in fiscal 2019 to consolidate the
VMware tracking stock VMware supports Fitch's assessment of
moderate linkage and contingent liquidity for Dell.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Revenue growth averages in the low single digits through the
    forecast period with the continuation of PC momentum through
    the first half of fiscal 2022 and recovery of infrastructure
    in the second half;

-- Profitability moderates in fiscal 2022, but a higher mix of
    infrastructure sales sustains Dell's standalone core EBITDA
    margins in the high single digits and roughly flat VMware
    profit margins;

-- The majority of FCF is used for debt reduction through fiscal
    2022;

-- Excess Dell cash is used for share repurchases and the company
    manages debt levels to sustain core leverage of 2.5x-3.0x.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Greater than expected debt reduction from FCF, resulting in
    the expectation core leverage will be sustained below 3.0x and
    adjusted FCF (adjusted for the change in financing
    receivables) to debt below 5.0x in the near term;

-- Positive revenue growth from profitable market share gains,
    despite challenging ISG demand dynamics.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Pre-dividend FCF margin sustained below 2%, from lower than
    anticipated revenue;

-- Expectations for core leverage sustained above 3.5x and FCF
    (adjusted for the change in financing receivables) to debt
    approaching the high single digits from weaker than expected
    profitability or lower than anticipated debt reduction.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Adequate Liquidity: Fitch believes Dell's liquidity is adequate. As
of Oct. 30, 2020, it was supported by $11.3 billion of cash and
cash equivalents -- $7.4 billion excluding VMware, the majority of
whose cash Fitch considers contingent liquidity. Dell's undrawn
$4.5 billion of first-lien senior secured RCF expiring on December
2023 also supports liquidity, as does Fitch's expectation for $3
billion-$4 billion of Dell standalone adjusted FCF.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch applies a maximum allowable debt-to-equity ratio of 3:1 to
Dell's financing receivables to allocate a portion of total debt to
DFS, which Fitch excludes from measuring core debt. Fitch similarly
excludes DFS profitability from total EBITDA to calculate core
EBITDA, as well as the change in financing receivables from FFO in
calculating adjusted FCF.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


DESTILERIA NACIONAL: Court Rejects Debtor's Plan & Disclosures
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte Inclan on Feb. 19, 2021, entered a ruling
denying confirmation of Destileria Nacional, Inc.'s Chapter 11
Small Business Plan.

"Upon Debtor's admittance that the Chapter 11 Small Business plan
dated January 13, 2021 cannot be confirmed as no class of creditors
has accepted the plan, confirmation of the plan is hereby denied,"
the judge ruled.

Judge Lamoutte also rejected the Debtor's explanatory Disclosure
Statement.

"The disclosure statement filed by the Debtor (dkt. #147) is not
finally approved as it fails to disclose the value of the Debtor's
business and fails to address the impact of this court's decision
entered on February 5, 2021 concluding that the amounts owed to
BPPR are an administrative claim (dkt. #233)."

On Feb. 12, 2021, the Court held a hearing to consider two
competing plans -- the Plan filed by the Debtor, and the competing
plan filed by Miramar Brewing LLC.

At the hearing various legal issues and controversies were
discussed.  The Court on Feb. 19, 2021, issued the minutes of the
hearing and incorporated his rulings rejecting the Debtor's Plan
and Disclosure Statement.  A copy of the Feb. 18 filing is
available at https://bit.ly/3ukYzQc

The Court has not yet issued an order approving Miramar's Plan.

                 About Destileria Nacional

Destileria Nacional, Inc., a beer manufacturer headquartered in
Guaynabo, P.R., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 20-01247) on March 6,
2020.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of between
$100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of between $500,001 and $1
million.  Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte Inclan oversees the case.  The
Debtor hired Isabel Fullana-Fraticelli & Asoc. PSC as its legal
counsel.


DIVERSITECH HOLDINGS: Moody's Rates $487MM First Lien Loan 'B2'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 rating to DiversiTech
Holdings, Inc., $487 million first lien term loan maturing December
2024 and revolving credit facility expiring in June 2024. There is
no effect on the company's existing ratings, including the B3
Corporate Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating.
The outlook is stable.

The first lien term loan proceeds will be used to repay the
existing first lien term loan and fund, in conjunction with cash on
the balance sheet, two acquisitions within the HVAC sector. Moody's
view this transaction as a credit positive since debt maturities
are extended and the company further diversifies its product
offering. Pro forma for the transaction, Moody's expect year end
December 2020 debt to EBITDA to improve to 5.8x reflecting the
planned acquisitions and improved company performance. Free cash
generation in 2021 and 2022 is expected to be used to fund future
acquisitions and reduce debt.

The B2 ratings assigned to the proposed first lien term loan and
revolver are one notch above the CFR, benefitting from the loss
absorption provided by a $120 million second lien term loan
maturing in 2025. The Caa2 rating on the company's second lien term
loan is not affected by the current transaction. The ratings on the
existing first lien term loan and revolver will be withdrawn upon
the close of the transaction.

Assignments:

Issuer: DiversiTech Holdings, Inc.

Gtd. Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Gtd. Senior Secured Term Loan, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

DiversiTech's B3 CFR reflects high leverage, relatively small scale
with revenue near $500 million, and a financial policy that
includes acquisitions given the fragmented market in which the
company competes. Integration risk is elevated as the company
implements a growth through acquisition strategy.

DiversiTech's broad parts offering is a benefit that provides a
one-stop-shop opportunity for its customers and solid supply
source. As a result, the company realizes a high level of
reoccurring revenue, given its broad customer base and
non-discretionary nature of the HVAC repair and replacement
business. Furthermore, the company's limited capital expenditure
requirements enable free cash generation that will be allocated
toward future acquisitions and debt reduction.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation DiversiTech
continues to generate organic revenue growth, supplemented by
acquisitions, in a disciplined manner.

The senior secured term loan is expected to contain certain
covenant flexibility for transactions that can adversely affect
creditors. The documents governing the company's senior secured
term loan give DiversiTech the ability to incur incremental
indebtedness so long as after closing: first lien net leverage
ratio does not exceed 4.75x (for pari passu indebtedness); and
total net leverage does not exceed 6.5x. However, DiversiTech is
obligated to prepay loans with 100% of asset sale proceeds.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be downgraded if debt to EBITDA is expected to be
sustained above 6.25x and there is a deterioration in liquidity.

The ratings could be upgraded if debt to EBITDA is expected to be
sustained below 5.0x and good liquidity is maintained.

DiversiTech Holdings, Inc., established in 1971 and headquartered
in Duluth, Georgia, is a manufacturer and distributor of engineered
components for residential and light commercial heating,
ventilation and air conditioning ("HVAC") and refrigeration. With
operations across the US, Canada, and U.K., the company provides
over 17,000 product SKUs to more than 4,500 customers through a
wholesale distribution channel. Since May 2017, DiversiTech has
been owned by private equity sponsor Permira Funds.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Manufacturing
Methodology published in March 2020.


DOLE FOOD: S&P Places 'B' ICR on Watch Pos. on Merger Announcement
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on U.S.-based Dole
Food Co., including its 'B' issuer credit rating, on CreditWatch
with positive implications.

S&P plans to resolve the CreditWatch once the transaction closes
and Dole's existing rated debt has been repaid.

The CreditWatch placement follows the announcement from fresh
produce provider Total Produce PLC that it will be merging with
Dole Food under a newly created company, Dole plc. As per the
agreement, Total Produce shareholders will receive 82.5% of Dole
plc shares, and current Dole majority owners will receive 17.5% of
Dole plc shares. S&P said, "The closing of the transaction, which
we expect in the second or third quarter of 2021, will be
contingent on the combined entity completing an IPO. We expect Dole
plc will use target proceeds of $500 million to $700 million to
repay Dole's and Total Produce's outstanding debt."

S&P said, "We expect leverage at the newly formed entity will be
between 3x and 3.5x, significantly lower than Dole's
trailing-12-month leverage of 5.4x as of Oct. 3, 2020, because of
lower debt levels and a larger EBITDA base. Additionally, we expect
the combined entity to benefit from increased scale, greater
geographic diversity, and more expansive product offerings compared
with standalone Dole Food."



DRC III: Seeks Approval to Hire Baird Holm as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
DRC III, LLC and its affiliates seek approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska to hire Baird Holm,
LLP as their special counsel.

The firm's services include:

     a. advising and assisting the Debtors in determining whether
they have causes of action under the Bankruptcy Code and applicable
non-bankruptcy law, and prosecuting such actions if it appears that
doing so may benefit the Debtors' estate;

     b. preparing legal papers necessary to address any causes of
action; and

     c. other necessary legal services.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     T. Randall Wright     $395 per hour
     Brandon Tomjack       $335 per hour
     Jeremy Hollembeak     $305 per hour
     Nick Buda             $250  per hour
     Legal assistants      $185 to $200 per hour
     Associates            $190 to $235 per hour

The retainer fee is $15,000.

Thomas Ashby, Esq., at Baird Holm, disclosed in a court filing that
the firm does not have any connection with the Debtor or any of its
creditors.

The firm can be reached through:

     Thomas O. Ashby, Esq.
     Baird Holm LLP
     1700 Franam Street, Suite 1500
     Omaha, NE 68102-2068
     Tel: 402-344-0500 / 402-636-8280
     Fax: 402-344-0588
     Email: tashby@bairdholm.com

                         About DRC III

DRC III and affiliates own and operate the Dismal River Club or DRC
in Mullen, Neb.  Established in 2006, the DRC has attracted golfers
from across the country and around the globe to the hills of
Western Nebraska to experience the Debtors' world class hunting,
fishing outdoor excursions, lodging amenities, five-star dining,
spa services and two highly rated golf courses. It is a vitally
important part of the economy of Mullen, Nebraska.

DRC III and affiliates filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Neb. Case No.
21-80011) on Jan. 7, 2021.  At the time of the filing, DRC III
disclosed assets of between $10,000,001 and $50 million and
liabilities of the same range.

Judge Brian S. Kruse oversees the cases.  

Turner Legal Group, LLC and Baird Holm, LLP serve as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel and special counsel, respectively.


EASTERDAY RANCHES: Seeks to Hire Bush Kornfeld as Local Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Easterday Ranches, Inc. and Easterday Farms seek approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington to
hire Bush Kornfeld LLP as their local counsel.

The firm's services include:

     (a) advising the Debtors of their rights, duties,
responsibilities and powers in their Chapter 11 cases;

     (b) assisting, advising and representing the Debtors relative
to the administration of the cases;

     (c) serving as conflicts counsel in the event a conflict of
interest arises in matters where the attorneys at Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP cannot provide that representation;

     (d) attending meetings and conferences and otherwise
communicating and negotiating with representatives of creditors and
other parties in interest;

     (e) assisting the Debtors and Pachulski in the formulation,
preparation, drafting, negotiating and obtaining approval of a plan
of reorganization or liquidation and corresponding disclosure
statement;

     (f) assisting the Debtors in the review, analysis, negotiation
and approval of any financing or funding agreements;

     (g) taking all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
interests of the Debtors, their business operations and their
bankruptcy estates including, without limitation, the prosecution
of actions against third parties;

     (h) assisting Pachulski to generally prepare legal papers;

     (i) appearing before the bankruptcy court, appellate courts,
and other courts or regulatory bodies; and

     (j) other legal services.

The firm's billing rates for attorneys range from $350 to $565 per
hour.  Its rates for clerks and paralegals range from $95 to $115
per hour.  Thomas Buford, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be
handling the cases, charges an hourly fee of $450.

As disclosed in court filings, Bush Kornfeld is a disinterested
person as defined by Bankruptcy Code Section 101(14).

The firm can be reached through:

     Thomas A. Buford, Esq.
     Bush Kornfeld LLP
     601 Union St., Suite 5000
     Seattle, WA 98101
     Tel: 206-292-2110 / 206-521-3855
     Fax: 206-292-2104
     Email: tbuford@bskd.com

            About Easterday Ranches and Easterday Farms

Easterday Ranches, Inc. is a privately held company in the cattle
ranching and farming business.  

Easterday Ranches sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 21-00141) on Feb. 1,
2021.  Its affiliate, Easterday Farms, a Washington general
partnership, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.
Wash. Case No. 21-00176) on Feb. 8, 2021.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 21-00141.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between
$100 million and $500 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Whitman L. Holt oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their lead
bankruptcy counsel, Bush Kornfeld LLP as local counsel, and Davis
Wright Tremaine LLP as special counsel.  T. Scott Avila and Peter
Richter of Paladin Management Group serve as restructuring
officers.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 18 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 16, 2021.


EASTERDAY RANCHES: Seeks to Hire Davis Wright as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Easterday Ranches Inc. and Easterday Farms seek approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington to
hire Davis Wright Tremaine LLP as their special counsel.

The Debtors need the firm's legal assistance in responding to
government inquiries and investigations, including but not limited
to, a subpoena issued by the U.S. Department of Justice.

The attorneys who are expected to be principally involved in these
cases are Matthew Diggs, Esq., and Mark Bartlett, Esq., who will
charge $635 per hour and $790 per hour, respectively.

Davis Wright is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court papers filed by
the firm.

The firm can be reached through:

     Matthew Diggs, Esq.
     Mark Bartlett, Esq.
     Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
     920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
     Seattle, WA 98104-1610
     Tel: 206-622-3150
     Fax: 206-757-7700
     Email: matthewdiggs@dwt.com

            About Easterday Ranches and Easterday Farms

Easterday Ranches, Inc. is a privately held company in the cattle
ranching and farming business.  

Easterday Ranches sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 21-00141) on Feb. 1,
2021.  Its affiliate, Easterday Farms, a Washington general
partnership, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.
Wash. Case No. 21-00176) on Feb. 8, 2021.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 21-00141.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between
$100 million and $500 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Whitman L. Holt oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their lead
bankruptcy counsel, Bush Kornfeld LLP as local counsel, and Davis
Wright Tremaine LLP as special counsel.  T. Scott Avila and Peter
Richter of Paladin Management Group serve as restructuring
officers.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 18 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 16, 2021.


EASTERDAY RANCHES: Seeks to Hire Pachulski Stang as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Easterday Ranches, Inc. and Easterday Farms seek approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington to
hire Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel.

The firm's services include:

     (a) advising the Debtors of their rights, duties,
responsibilities and powers in their Chapter 11 cases;

     (b) assisting, advising and representing the Debtors relative
to the administration of their cases;

     (c) attending meetings and conferences and otherwise
communicating and negotiating with representatives of creditors and
other parties in interest as to matters arising in or related to
the cases;

     (d) assisting the Debtors in formulating, preparing, drafting,
negotiating and obtaining approval of a plan of reorganization or
liquidation and corresponding disclosure statement;

     (e) assisting the Debtors in the review, analysis, negotiation
and approval of any financing or funding agreements;

     (f) taking all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
interests of the Debtors, their business operations and their
bankruptcy estates, including, without limitation, the prosecution
of actions against third parties;

     (g) reviewing, analyzing, evaluating and (where appropriate)
filing objections to claims filed or asserted against the Debtors;


     (h) assisting the Debtors in the review, analysis, negotiation
and approval of any transactions as an alternative to confirmation
of a plan of reorganization or liquidation;

     (i) preparing legal papers;

     (j) appearing before the bankruptcy court, appellate courts,
and other courts or regulatory bodies in which matters may be heard
in connection with the cases; and

     (k) other legal services.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Richard M. Pachulski              $1,595 per hour
     Alan J. Kornfeld                  $1,395 per hour
     Jeffrey W. Dulberg                $1,025 per hour
     Maxim B. Litvak                   $1,125 per hour
     Paul J. Labov                     $1,095 per hour
     Jason H. Rosell                   $845 per hour
     Karen B. Dine                     $1,195 per hour
     Benjamin L. Wallen                $750 per hour
     Patricia Jeffries                 $460 per hour
      (paraprofessional)

The billing rates for the firm's attorneys range from $695 to
$1,695 per hour.  Clerks and paraprofessionals charge between $375
and $460 per hour.

Richard Pachulski, Esq., a partner at Pachulski Stang, disclosed in
a court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as that
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Richard Pachulski, Esq.
     Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
     10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90067-4003
     Tel: 310-277-6910
     Fax: 310-201-0760
     Email: rpachulski@pszjlaw.com

            About Easterday Ranches and Easterday Farms

Easterday Ranches, Inc. is a privately held company in the cattle
ranching and farming business.  

Easterday Ranches sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 21-00141) on Feb. 1,
2021.  Its affiliate, Easterday Farms, a Washington general
partnership, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.
Wash. Case No. 21-00176) on Feb. 8, 2021.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 21-00141.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between
$100 million and $500 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Whitman L. Holt oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their lead
bankruptcy counsel, Bush Kornfeld LLP as local counsel, and Davis
Wright Tremaine LLP as special counsel.  T. Scott Avila and Peter
Richter of Paladin Management Group serve as restructuring
officers.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 18 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 16, 2021.


ECOARK HOLDINGS: Julia Olguin Appointed White River CEO
-------------------------------------------------------
Julia Olguin was appointed as the chief executive officer of White
River Holdings Corp, a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Ecoark
Holdings, Inc.

Julia Olguin, 52, had previously served as the executive vice
president, Business Development, Trading & Marketing and Strategy,
at Meridian Energy Group Inc., an oil and gas exploration and
development company, from January 2014 until July 2020.

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Ms.
Olguin, effective Feb. 4, 2021.  The initial term of the Employment
Agreement is three years, subject to automatic renewal for
successive one-year terms upon the expiration of the initial term,
unless terminated by either party.  Pursuant to her Employment
Agreement, Ms. Olguin will be paid an annual base salary of
$150,000, subject to an automatic increase to $250,000 upon
achievement of certain strategic goals as provided for in the
Employment Agreement, and will be eligible to earn for each fiscal
year a performance bonus of up to 100% of her annual base salary,
based on achievement of certain individual and White River
performance targets.  In addition, Ms. Olguin has received 15,000
Restricted Stock Units of the Company as an inducement to become an
employee of White River.  The RSUs will vest in equal annual
increments over a three-year period with the first portion vesting
on Feb. 4, 2022, subject to continued employment on each applicable
vesting date and execution of the Company's standard Restricted
Stock Unit Agreement.

                       About Ecoark Holdings

Rogers, Arkansas-based Ecoark Holdings, Inc., founded in 2011,
Ecoark is a diversified holding company.  Ecoark Holdings has four
wholly-owned subsidiaries: Ecoark, Inc., a Delaware corporation
which is the parent of Zest Labs, Inc., 440IoT Inc., Banner
Midstream Corp., and Trend Discovery Holdings Inc. Through its
subsidiaries, the Company is engaged in three separate and distinct
business segments: (i) technology; (ii) commodities; and (iii)
financial.

Ecoark reported a net loss of $12.14 million for the year ended
March 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $13.65 million for the
year ended March 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had
$39.32 million in total assets, $15.46 million in total
liabilities, and $23.86 million in total stockholders' equity.


EDGEWELL PERSONAL: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Ba3 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Edgewell Personal Care Co. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Edgewell's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating reflects the company's
challenging industry operating environment. Edgewell will continue
to face intense competition from much larger, well diversified
competitors in its wet shave, skin care and feminine care
businesses. The company's credit profile also reflects its
concentration in mature, highly promotional categories that present
a strategic growth challenge. Edgewell's credit profile is
supported by the company's portfolio of well-known consumer product
brands including Schick, Playtex, and Banana Boat. The company also
generates good free cash flow.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


ELLINGTON 2021-1: S&P Assigns Prelim B (sf) Rating on B-2 Certs
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to Ellington
Financial Mortgage Trust 2021-1's mortgage pass-through
certificates.

The certificate issuance is an RMBS transaction backed by U.S.
residential mortgage loans.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of Feb. 17,
2021. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

The preliminary ratings reflect:

-- The pool's collateral composition;

-- The credit enhancement provided for this transaction;

-- The transaction's associated structural mechanics;

-- The representation and warranty (R&W) framework for this
transaction;

-- The mortgage aggregator, Ellington Financial Inc.;

-- The impact that the economic stress brought on by COVID-19 is
likely to have on the performance of the mortgage borrowers in the
pool and liquidity available in the transaction.

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  Ellington Financial Mortgage Trust 2021-1

  Class A-1, $188,702,000: AAA (sf)
  Class A-2, $13,470,000: AA (sf)
  Class A-3, $28,324,000: A (sf)
  Class M-1, $9,442,000: BBB (sf)
  Class B-1, $6,797,000: BB (sf)
  Class B-2, $3,777,000: B (sf)
  Class B-3, $1,258,835: not rated
  Class A-IO-S, notional(ii): not rated
  Class X, notional(ii): not rated
  Class R, not applicable: not rated

(i)The preliminary ratings address S&P's expectation for the
ultimate payment of interest and principal.
(ii)The notional amount equals the loans' stated principal balance.


ENERGIZER HOLDINGS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B1 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Energizer Holdings, Inc. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Energizer's B1 Corporate Family Rating reflects its concentration
in the declining battery category that is facing a slow secular
decline as consumer products are increasingly evolving toward
rechargeable technologies. The credit profile also reflects high
event risk as Energizer has chosen to expand outside of the battery
business -- through debt financed acquisitions -- into totally
unrelated businesses. The company's high pro-forma financial
leverage, following the acquisition of the Spectrum assets in
January 2019, also limits financial flexibility to invest and
sustain the dividend. Energizer's credit profile is supported by
its leading market position in the single use and specialized
battery market, and portfolio of well-known brands in the battery
and consumer car maintenance segments, and solid operating cash
flow.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


ESPORTS USA: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 100% in Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
Esports USA Holdings, Inc., filed an Amended Plan of Reorganization
on Feb. 19, 2021.

The Plan proposes to pay creditors of Esports from new capital
raised and revenue from operations.

Holders of small non-priority unsecured claims in Class 2 -
comprised of unsecured claims that each does not exceed $1,000 -
are unimpaired under the Plan.  The only Class 2 creditor is Cintas
which shall receive a lump sum payment of $527.

Holders of other general unsecured claims in Class 3 will be paid
in full.  The only creditor falling within this class is a claim
filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank with respect to a credit card. This
class shall receive monthly payments of $500 per month beginning on
the Effective Date with a balloon payment of the remaining Allowed
Claim on or before Dec. 31, 2022.

The Debtor anticipates that unsecured creditors would receive 8% in
a liquidation scenario.

Holders of equity interests will retain their equity in the
Debtor.

A copy of the Plan filed Feb. 19, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3duOcmV

                    About Esports USA Holdings

ESports USA Holdings, Inc., owns and operates Valhalla Esports
Lounge, an esports bar and restaurant in Austin, Texas.

On Oct. 14, 2020, ESports USA Holdings sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 20-11125). The Debtor was estimated to
have $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million
in liabilities.  The Hon. Tony M. Davis is the case judge.  The
Debtor tapped Barron & Newburger, P.C., led by Stephen W. Sather,
Esq., as bankruptcy counsel and Whitley LLP Attorneys at Law as
securities counsel.


EVANGEL INTERNATIONAL: Wins Court Approval of Reorganization Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas on
Feb. 19, 2021, entered an order confirming Evangel International
Foods, Inc.'s Second Amended Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor's Plan is confirmed subject to this modification:

     "The Debtor shall pay the SBA $20,000 by the effective date of
the plan (which is the 15th business day following entry of the
confirmation order), and then the balance of the SBA loan shall be
repaid over a period of 24 months at 3.5% interest."

The Debtor on Jan. 26, 2021, filed a Second Amended Plan that
proposes to pay general unsecured creditors in full over time.  The
Bank of America claim is allowed for $14,000 and the Dominion
African Food Store claim is allowed for $5,000.  Bank of America
will be paid in 60 equal monthly payments of $234, and Dominion
African Food Store will be paid in 60 equal monthly payments of
$84.  There will be no interest paid on these claims.

The Plan will be funded by the Reorganized Debtor through its
future business income.  The current management will remain in
control.

A copy of the Second Amended Plan dated Jan. 26, 2021, is available
at https://bit.ly/37vRnXy

A copy of the Plan Confirmation Order dated Feb. 19, 2021, is
available at https://bit.ly/3bpApLN

               About Evangel International Foods

Evangel International Foods, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-31480) on March 2, 2020, listing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor tapped
Margaret M. McClure as a legal attorney.


EXACTUS INC: 3i Agrees to Settle Pending Litigation
---------------------------------------------------
Exactus, Inc. entered into a securities purchase agreement with 3i,
LP and an institutional investor under which the Investor agreed to
purchase and 3i agreed to sell that certain 8% senior secured
convertible note dated Nov. 27, 2019 and all of the Company's
warrants previously issued to 3i and 3i agreed settle and release
all claims asserted against the Company.  As a result, 3i agreed to
dismissal of all pending litigation against the Company.

As a result, the Subsidiary Guaranty, IP Security Agreement and
Registration Rights Agreement with 3i were also terminated.

In addition, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with
the Investor and filed with the Secretary of State of the State of
Nevada a Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and
Limitations for Series A Preferred Stock under which the Note in
the original principal amount of $750,000 would be exchanged for
$500,000 of a new series of the Company's preferred stock
designated 0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with a stated
value of $1,000 per share.

The Company authorized the issuance of a total of 1,000
($1,000,000) of its Series A Preferred for issuance.  Each share of
Series A Preferred is convertible at the option of the Holder, into
that number of shares of the Company's common stock, par value
$0.0001 per share) (subject to certain limitations on beneficial
ownership) determined by dividing the Stated Value by $0.05 per
share, subject to adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock
splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar
transactions that proportionately decrease or increase the Common
Stock.

The Company is prohibited from effecting the conversion of the
Series A Preferred to the extent that, as a result of such
conversion, the holder beneficially owns more than 4.99% (which may
be increased to 9.99% upon 61 days' written notice to the Company),
in the aggregate, of the issued and outstanding shares of the
Common Stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the
issuance of shares of Common Stock upon the conversion of the
Series A Preferred.  Holders of the Series A Preferred shall be
entitled to vote on all matters submitted to the Company's
stockholders and shall be entitled to the number of votes equal to
the number of shares of Common Stock into which the shares of
Series A Preferred Stock are convertible, subject to applicable
beneficial ownership limitations.  The Series A Preferred Stock
provides a liquidation preference equal to the Stated Value, plus
any accrued and unpaid dividends, fees or liquidated damages.

The Series A Preferred can be redeemed at the Company's option upon
payment of a redemption premium between 120% to 135% of the Stated
Value of the outstanding Series A Preferred redeemed.  The Company
is not obligated to file a registration statement under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the shares of
Common Stock into which Series A Preferred may be converted however
the Investor will be deemed to have held the Series A Preferred on
the original issue date to 3i for the purposes of the availability
of an exemption from registration provided by Rule 144 under the
Act.

On Feb. 16, 2021 the Company filed a Certificate of Cancellation
and Withdrawal with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada
cancelling its previous Certificate of Designation of Preferences,
Rights and Limitations for Series A Preferred Stock, all of which
has been converted to Common Stock.

               Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

On Feb. 16, 2021, the Company's board of directors authorized the
issuance of up to 1,000 shares of its Series A Preferred.

The Company also has offered to its Series B-1 and Series B-2
preferred stock inducements to voluntarily convert preferred shares
into the Company's Common Stock and expect to file a Certificate of
Cancellation and Withdrawal with the Secretary of State of the
State of Nevada cancelling its previous Certificate of Designation
of Preferences, Rights and Limitations for Series B-1, B-2, C. D
and E Preferred Stock upon conversion or cancellation of all such
Series.

              Strategic Alternatives Committee Formation

On Jan. 22, 2021, the Company's Board of Directors formed a
Strategic Alternatives Committee, for the purpose of evaluating
potential acquisitions, mergers, and other strategic business
combinations.  The new committee consists of Directors Larry Wert
and Julian Pittam, with Mr. Wert serving as its chairman.  During
January and February 2021, the Strategic Alternatives Committee
reviewed various business combination proposals and entered into
separate negotiations to acquire two companies with existing
business and operations in the electric vehicle industry.  Ongoing
due diligence is continuing with respect to one of the two
companies.

As previously reported, on Jan. 22, 2021, the Company's Board of
Directors authorized a possible reverse split of its common stock
at a ratio of between 1 share for every 40 shares held and 1 share
for every 50 shares held, to be determined in the further
discretion of the Board.  The reverse split is subject to approval
by the Company's shareholders unless the number of authorized
shares of the Company's capital stock is reduced proportionately in
accordance with Nevada law, and may be authorized, if at all, in
connection with a recapitalization required in connection with an
acquisition or similar event.  In connection with a potential
acquisition, the Company is continuing its recapitalization efforts
through, among other things, cancellation and exchange of existing
indebtedness for equity, cancellation of its outstanding series of
preferred stock, and a reverse split.  Under the terms under
discussion for the possible acquisition of a company in the
electric vehicle industry, the Company believes that a reverse
split of its Common Stock of approximately 1:40 may be authorized
by its Board of Directors.

                           About Exactus

Exactus Inc. (OTCQB:EXDI) -- http://www.exactusinc.com/-- is a
producer and supplier of hemp-derived ingredients and feminized
hemp genetics.  Exactus is committed to creating a positive impact
on society and the environment promoting sustainable agricultural
practices. Exactus specializes in hemp-derived ingredients
(CBD/CBG/CBC/CBN) and feminized seeds that meet the highest
standards of quality and traceability.  Through research and
development, the Company continues to stay ahead of market trends
and regulations.  Exactus is at the forefront of product
development for the beverage, food, pets, cosmetics, wellness, and
pharmaceutical industries.

Exactus reported a net loss of $10.22 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $4.34 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company had $3.11
million in total assets, $5 million in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $1.89 million.

RBSM LLP, in Henderson, NV, the Company's auditor since 2014,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated May 22,
2020, citing that the Company has recurring losses from operations,
limited cash flow, and an accumulated deficit.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


FARM-RITE INC: Wins Cash Collateral Access Until March 16
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jerrold N. Poslusny, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey authorized Farm-Rite, Inc. to use cash
collateral on an interim basis until March 16, 2021.
  
The Debtor was authorized to use cash collateral with a 20% cushion
allowed to the Debtor over and above the amount stated in the
Debtor's budget.

In addition to the adequate protection granted to secured creditor
Farm Credit in the Court's Initial Orders, the Court ordered, among
others, that:

     (a) a report be provided to Farm Credit, as of January 31,
2021, showing the inventory and accounts receivable in the format
used by the Debtor and Farm Credit for the Debtor's "Borrowing Base
Certificate."  The report should have all exhibits and schedules,
including accounts receivable report, accounts receivable ageing
report, schedule of new units owned, schedule of used units owned,
and parts inventory;

    (b) a replacement perfected security interest under 11 U.S.C.
Section 361(2) be granted to the extent that each of Secured
Creditors TCFIF, WFCDF, Land Pride-Division of Great Plains Mfg.
Inc. and Kubota's cash collateral liens are respectively validated
pursuant to further proceedings, to the extent and with the same
priority in all of the Debtor's post-petition collateral, and
proceeds thereof, that each of TCFIF, WFCDF, Land Pride and Kubota
respectively held in the Debtor's pre-petition property, subject to
payments due under 28 U.S.C. Section 1930(a)(6);

    (c) to the extent that adequate protection provided for proves
insufficient to protect the interests of each of TCFIF, WFCDF, Land
Pride and Kubota in and to the cash collateral, as set forth in the
Motion, each of TCFIF, WFCDF, Land Pride and Kubota respectively
shall have a super priority administrative expense claim, pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. Section 507(a), in the same validity and priority to
which they were entitled as of the Petition Date, whether in this
proceeding or in any superseding proceeding, subject to payments
due under 28 U.S.C. Section 1930 (a)(6).  Excluded from this
super-priority administrative claim are any causes of action
arising under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code.

     (d) within 10 days of the entry of the Ninth Interim Order,
the Debtor shall produce the unadjusted year to date profit and
loss statement through January 31, 2021 to TCFIF, WFCDF, Land
Pride, and Kubota; and

     (e) the Debtor shall provide TCFIF, WFCDF, Land Pride, CNH
Industrial Capital America LLC, and Kubota all other reports
required by the pre-petition loan documents and any other reports
reasonably required by TCFIF, WFCDF, Land Pride and Kubota, as well
as copies of the Debtor's monthly United States Trustee Operating
Reports.  Upon appointment of an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors, the Debtor shall submit a copy of the monthly United
States Trustee Operating Reports to Committee counsel if counsel
has been appointed, and until counsel is retained, to the Chairman
of the Committee.

A final hearing on the Debtor's motion to use cash collateral is
set for March 16, 2021 at 11 a.m.  The deadline for the filing of
objections to the Court's Ninth Interim Order is March 9.

                    About Farm-Rite Inc.

Farm-Rite Inc. offers agriculture, construction, commercial
irrigation, and commercial landscaping equipment. Bridgeton,
N.J.-based Farm-Rite filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 20-19379) on August 7, 2020.

The case is assigned to Judge Jerrold Poslusny. Arthur J.
Abramowitz, Esq., at Sherman Silverstein Kohl Rose & Podolsky,
serves as the Debtor's counsel. The Debtor hired Karpac & Company
as an accountant.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Donald C.
Strang, president.



FENCEPOST PRODUCTIONS: March 24 Amended Disclosure Hearing Set
--------------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 12, 2021, debtors Fencepost Productions, Inc., et al.,
filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas an
Amended Disclosure Statement.  On Feb. 16, 2021, Judge Dale L.
Somers ordered that:

     * March 24, 2021, at 2:30 p.m., at 210 United States
Courthouse, 444 SE Quincy, Topeka, KS 66683 is the hearing to
consider the approval of the amended disclosure statement.

     * March 22, 2021, is fixed as the last day for filing and
serving written objections to the amended disclosure statement.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 16, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3sdjgvy from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.  

                 About Fencepost Productions

Fencepost Productions, Inc. -- http://www.fencepostproductions.com/
-- is a designer and distributor of men's, women's, and youth
outdoor apparel under its brands Staghorn River, Willow Trails, and
Northern Outpost.

Fencepost Productions and its affiliates, NPB Company Inc. and Old
Dominion Apparel Corporation, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Lead Case No. 19-41545) on Dec.
18, 2019.  At the time of the filing, Fencepost Productions was
estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.  Judge Dale L. Somers
oversees the cases.

The Debtor has tapped Mcdowell Rice Smith & Buchanan as its legal
counsel and Hovey Williams, LLP, as its special counsel.


FF FUND: April 26 & 27 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 4, 2021, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida conducted a hearing to consider approval of the
second amended disclosure statement filed by FF Fund I, L.P. and F5
Business Investment Partners, LLC.

On Feb. 16, 2021, Judge Laurel M. Isicoff approved the second
amended disclosure statement and ordered that:

     * April 26 and 27, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. via Zoom Video
Conference is the hearing to consider confirmation of the plan.

     * April 12, 2021, is the last day for filing and serving fee
applications.

     * April 12, 2021, is the last day for filing and serving
objections to confirmation of the plan.

     * April 12, 2021, is the last day for filing a ballot
accepting or rejecting the plan.

     * March 17, 2021, is the last day for filing and serving
objections to claims.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 16, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3bsCdmW from PacerMonitor at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtors:

     Paul J. Battista, Esq.
     Florida Bar No. 884162
     Heather L. Harmon. Esq.
     Florida Bar No. 013192
     GENOVESE JOBLOVE & BATTISTA, P.A.
     100 SE 2nd Street, 44th Floor
     Miami, FL 33131
     Telephone: (305) 349-2300
     Facsimile: (305) 349-2310

                          About FF Fund

FF Fund I, L.P., is a limited partnership that was formed in August
2010.  FF Fund's general partner is FF Management.  FF Fund's
offering documents identified a broad range of investment
strategies to achieve its stated objectives of "capital
appreciation and current income."

FF Fund has 13 subsidiaries and affiliates that FF Management set
up and routinely evolved over the roughly 10 years since FF Fund's
formation for various accounting, tax, audit, insurance,
regulatory, liquidity, operational, and administrative reasons.

F3 Real Estate Partners, LLC, was established to invest in real
estate primarily from 2011 through 2019.  Prior to the CRO's
appointment, F3 purchased and then sold a residential complex
containing 87 condominium units in West Palm Beach, FL, which sale
transaction closed in May 2019.

F5 Business Investment Partners, LLC, held and currently owns the
majority of the current investments made by FF Fund with monies
received from the Limited Partners.  The investments made by the F5
consisted mainly of (i) illiquid, non-tradeable privately held
shares in early-stage or start-up companies, (ii) minority
interests in real estate partnerships, or (iii) unsecured
promissory notes.

F6 Standard Securities Partners, LLC, held liquid hedge fund
investments.

The remainder of the subsidiaries had nominal investments.

On Sept. 24, 2019, FF Management retained Soneet R. Kapila to
manage FF Fund.  FF Management was and is controlled by Andrew
Franzone.

FF Fund I L.P., an investment company based in Miami, Fla., filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-22744) on Sept. 24, 2019.  In the
petition signed by CRO Soneet R. Kapila, the Debtor estimated $50
million to $100 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  

On Jan. 24, 2020, F5 Business Investment Partners, LLC, an
affiliate of FF Fund, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 20-10996).  The case is jointly administered with that of
FF Fund.  At the time of the filing, F5 Business estimated assets
of between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of between
$1 million and $10 million.

Chief Judge Laurel M. Isicoff oversees the cases.  

Paul J. Battista, Esq., at Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., is
serving as the Debtors' legal counsel.

No creditors' committee has been appointed in the case.  In
addition, no trustee or examiner has been appointed.


FIELDWOOD ENERGY: Will Pay $2 Mil. to Settle Oil Spill Allegations
------------------------------------------------------------------
Leslie A. Pappas of Bloomberg Law reports that bankrupt offshore
oil driller Fieldwood Energy LLC has agreed to pay $2 million to
resolve federal criminal allegations related to oil spills in the
Gulf of Mexico.

The agreement between Fieldwood and the U.S. Attorney's Office for
the Eastern District of Louisiana, which still requires bankruptcy
court approval, would resolve the company's criminal liabilities
over oil spills that occurred in 2015 and 2018.

Houston-based Fieldwood will admit that its employees and
third-party contractors committed certain crimes, including
falsifying inspection records and overriding safety systems,
Michael T. Dane, the company's senior vice president and CFO, said
in a court declaration Thursday, February 18, 2021.

                    About Fieldwood Energy

Fieldwood Energy LLC -- http://www.fieldwoodenergy.com/-- is a
portfolio company of Riverstone Holdings focused on acquiring and
developing conventional assets, primarily in the Gulf of Mexico
region.  It is the largest operator in the Gulf of Mexico owning an
interest in approximately 500 leases covering over two million
gross acres with 1,000 wells and 750 employees.

Fieldwood Energy and its 13 affiliates previously sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 18-30648) on Feb. 15,
2018, with a prepackaged plan that would deleverage $3.286 billion
of funded debt by $1.626 billion.  Mike Dane, senior vice
president, and chief financial officer signed the petitions. At the
time of the filing, Debtors disclosed $1 billion to $10 billion in
both assets and liabilities.

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as their legal
counsel, Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as an investment banker, and
AlixPartners, LLP as financial advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the
claims, noticing, and solicitation agent.

The first-lien group has employed O'Melveny & Myers LLP as its
legal counsel and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as its financial
advisor.  

The RBL lenders have employed Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP as their
legal counsel and RPA Advisors, LLC as their financial advisor.   

The cross-holder group has tapped Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as its
legal counsel and PJT Partners LP as its financial advisor.

On Aug. 18, 2020, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors.  Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP,
and Conway MacKenzie, LLC serve as the committee's legal counsel
and financial advisor, respectively.  On Nov. 30, the Committee
received approval to hire Mani Little & Wortmann, PLLC as its legal
counsel.


FIREBALL REALTY: Sargent Buying Manchester Property for $720K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fireball Realty, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Hampshire to authorize the private sale of the real
property located at 16 South Willow Street, in Manchester, New
Hampshire, to Charles Sargent, Sr. and/or assigns for $720,000
pursuant to the terms of their Purchase and Sale Agreement.

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 9, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.

The Property consists of a commercial building, said deed is
recorded in the Hillsborough County Registry of Deeds in Book 8988,
Page 0609.  The Debtor believes that the Property is worth
approximately $720,000 in its current state.  The City of
Manchester has the property assessed at $326,600.  The Subject
Property is the last real property owned by the Debtor.  

The Debtor owes Primary Bank approximately $720,000.  Primary has
agreed to accept $720,000 in exchange for releasing the Subject
Property from the mortgages that secure the payment of the loan.
Primary will release the remaining unsecured amount of its claim
for $1.

From the beginning of the case, the Debtor intended to sell the
Subject Property in the ordinary course of its business.  Its title
to the Property is encumbered by a real estate tax lien held by the
City of Manchester, New Hampshire for unpaid real estate taxes in
the approximate amount of $8,400.91 and the past due real estate
taxes for 2020, for a total as of Feb. 5, 2021 of $17,319.30 and
the Primary Bank liens, which secure the payment of approximately
$870,000.

The Buyer is an insider with respect to the Debtor; however, in the
arms'-length transaction, the Debtor is receiving more than fair
market value for the Subject Property.

The Contract is a standard New Hampshire Realtor form.  The
purchase price for the Property is $720,000.  It has no
contingencies other than (a) good, clear record and marketable
title on the closing date; (b) financing by Primary Bank for the
amount of $720.000; and (c) the approval of the Court.  In the
opinion of the Debtor, the Purchase Price exceeds the fair market
value of the Property as it sits and the other terms of the
Contract are fair, reasonable and generally consistent those
prevailing in the marketplace.

The Debtor will pay the real estate taxes due City of Manchester
and recording fees and expenses estimated to be less than $250.
Following payment of real estate taxes and closing costs, the
balance of the sale proceeds and escrow funds currently held by
Primary Bank will be remitted to Primary Bank for application to
the Primary Loans.

The Debtor, which is engaged in the business of developing, leasing
and selling real residential real estate believes that the Purchase
Price is reasonably equivalent to the fair market value of the
Subject Property.  Primary has agreed to and accepts the terms of
the purchase and sale.

The Purchase Price will not be reduced by a broker's commission, as
no broker brought about the transaction.

There are no conditions precedent to the Contract Buyer's
obligation to close the transaction other than (a) good, clear
record and marketable title; (b) financing by Primary Bank of the
total purchase price of $720,000; and (c) the approval of the
Court.  In the Debtor's business judgment, the other terms of the
Contract are fair, reasonable and consistent with those prevailing
in the marketplace.  

Continuing to own the Subject Property will cause the Debtor to
incur liabilities for debt service to Primary, insurance premiums,
and real estate taxes.  The Sale will close within 10 days of the
date on which the order approving the Sale becomes final.  The Sale
proceeds will reduce significantly the Primary debt and the
interest accruing thereon.  As a result, the Sale is in the best
interests of the estate.

The Debtor expects the Local Government to consent to the Sale
given the fact that any real estate taxes due the Local Government
will be paid from the Sale proceeds.  Primary has consented to the
Sale.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/k65cxgh6 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

          
           About Fireball Realty, LLC

Fireball Realty LLC is a real estate agency in Manchester, New
Hampshire.

The Debtor sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. N.H. Case No.
19-10922) on June 28, 2019.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.

The Debtor tapped William S. Gannon, Esq., at William S. Gannon
PLLC as counsel.

The petition was signed by Charles R. Sargent, Jr., member.



FLEX ACQUISITION: S&P Assigns 'B' Rating on New $1.275BB Term Loan
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to Flex Acquisition Co. Inc.'s proposed $1.275
billion first-lien term loan (due 2028). The '3' recovery rating
indicates its expectation for meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded
estimate: 60%) in the event of a payment default. The company is
issuing the $1.275 billion first-lien term loan to fully redeem its
remaining 2023 first-lien term loan outstanding ($1.276 billion as
of Dec. 31, 2020). The company is also seeking to extend the
maturity on its $500 million revolving credit facility to February
2026. S&P views the proposed transaction as debt leverage neutral,
given the dollar-for-dollar refinancing. As such, the transaction
does not affect its 'B' issuer credit rating and stable outlook on
the parent company Flex Acquisition Holdings Inc.

Flex Acquisition Holdings is a leading U.S. manufacturer of paper
food packaging, plastic, and paper carry bags, institutional can
liners, and plastic films, primarily for the grocery, food service,
retail, and commercial end markets. The company operates through
three segments: plastics (35% of 2019 sales), paper (40%), and
Waddington (25%). Flex generated about $3.4 billion in sales and
$623 million in adjusted EBITDA for the 12-months-ended Sept. 30,
2020. Financial sponsor The Carlyle Group owns the company.

Issue Ratings—Recovery Analysis

Key analytical factors

-- S&P is assigning its 'B' issue level rating and '3' recovery
rating to Flex's proposed $1.275 billion first-lien term loan. The
'3' recovery rating indicates its expectation for meaningful
recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%) in the event of a payment
default.

-- S&P's recovery analysis assumes Flex's underlying business
would continue to have considerable value and expects the company
would emerge from bankruptcy rather than pursue liquidation in a
default scenario.

-- S&P's simulated default scenario assumes a payment default in
2024 stemming from deteriorating economic conditions and declining
sales volumes on weak end-market demand. At the same time, it
assumes competition intensifies and rising raw material costs
pressure Flex's margins and cash flows. Furthermore, S&P expects
market conditions to limit the company's ability to pass rising
input costs to customers.

-- Therefore, cash flow would be insufficient to cover its
interest expense, required amortization on the term loan, working
capital, and maintenance capital outlays.

-- Eventually, the company's liquidity and capital resources would
become strained to the point it could not continue to operate
without filing for bankruptcy.

-- S&P assumes Flex would seek covenant amendments on its path to
default--resulting in higher interest costs--and higher obligation
on its $500 million revolving credit facility, which is 80% drawn.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Simulated year of default: 2024
-- Emergence EBITDA: $369.6 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 5.5x

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% in administrative costs): $1.9
billion

-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 95%/5%

-- Collateral value available to first-lien debt claims: $1.89
billion

-- Estimated first-lien claim: $2.97 billion

    --Recovery expectations: 50%-70% (rounded estimate: 60%)

-- Value available for unsecured claim: $33.8 million

-- Unsecured claim: $1.16 billion

    --Recovery range: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 0%)

All debt amounts at default include six months of accrued
prepetition interest.


FLOYD SQUIRES: Liquidating Agent Files Notice on Property Sale
--------------------------------------------------------------
Janina M. Hoskins, the Liquidating Agent of the estate of the Floyd
E. Squires III and Betty J. Squires, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California a notice of her
proposed sale of the estate's partial interest in the real property
located at 1606 Koster Street, in Eureka, California, an improved
parcel, to Rory A. Hanson and Jo Ann Hanson Trustees of the Rory
and Jo Ann Hanson 2020 Revocable Trust, dated April 21, 2020, or
its designee, for $187,500, all cash.

Objections, if any must be filed within 21 days of mailing the
notice.  In the event of a timely objection or request for hearing,
the initiating party will give at least seven days written notice
of the telephonic hearing to the objecting or requesting party, and
to any trustee or committee appointed in the case.

The Property generates $975 a month in revenue.  The Property is
currently vested in the Buyer.  The Debtors' scheduled value of the
Property at $375,000, with their partial interest valued at
$187,500.   

The Debtors are currently utilizing a portion of the Property to
operate their rental business and/or for storage.  The Liquidating
Agent has been informed that the portion of the Property occupied
by the Debtors was, at one time, rented for $1,500 per month.  The
Debtors have been put on notice that under the terms of Bankruptcy
Code Section 542, they are required to turn over the Property to
the Liquidating Agent so the Property can be sold. The Debtors have
indicated that they will vacate the Property no later than March
15, 2021.  If the Debtors do not vacate the Property as indicated,
the Trustee will ask the Court, on an ex parte basis, for a
turnover of the Property and ask a writ of assistance if required.


Based upon written communication between the Buyer and the
Liquidating Agent, through her counsel, the Liquidating Agent has
agreed to accept the sum of $187,500 in consideration for the
purchase of the estate's partial interest in the Property.   The
Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "as is, where is" basis,
with no warranties or representations.  The Property, as noted, is
occupied.  The Liquidating Agent has agreed that the Debtors will
be removed from the Property prior to closing of the sale.  Any
dispute over the terms of the sale agreement will be resolved by
the Court.  

At the time of closing of the sale, the Liquidating Agent will
provide a quitclaim deed transferring all right, title and interest
of the estate to the Buyer.

The Liquidating Agent has concluded that the sale of the partial
interest in the Property for the sum of $187,500 to the Buyer is in
the best interest of the estate and will avoid what otherwise could
be delays, the incurring of expenses to file an adversary
proceeding and other potential risks.  Absent a sale to a co-owner,
the Liquidating Agent would need to pursue an action under
Bankruptcy Code Section 363(h) (11 U.S.C. Section 363(h)), asking
to allow the sale of the Property.  The Property needs repair, and
generates inadequate revenue to make necessary repairs and pay all
expenses.

The Liquidating Agent asks that the order approving this proposed
sale of the Property provide as follows: "This Order is effective
upon entry, and the stay otherwise imposed by Rule 62(a) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h)
will not apply."

                        About the Squires

Floyd E. Squires, III, and Betty J. Squires filed for chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-10828) on Nov. 8, 2017,
and are represented by David N. Chandler, Esq. of the Law Offices
of David N. Chandler.

Janina M. Hoskins was appointed as examiner of the Debtors on
April
23, 2018.  DENTONS US LLP, led by Michael A. Isaacs, is the
examiner's counsel.



FLOYD SQUIRES: Liquidating Agent Selling Eureka Property for $188K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Janina M. Hoskins, the Liquidating Agent of the estate of the Floyd
E. Squires III and Betty J. Squires, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California to authorize the sale of
partial interest in the real property located at 1606 Koster
Street, in Eureka, California, an improved parcel, to Rory A.
Hanson and Jo Ann Hanson Trustees of the Rory and Jo Ann Hanson
2020 Revocable Trust, dated April 21, 2020, or its designee, for
$187,500, all cash.

The Property generates $975 per month in revenue.  The Property is
currently vested in Rory A. Hanson and Jo Ann Hanson.  The Debtors'
schedules valued the Property at $375,000, with their half interest
valued at $187,500.

The Liquidating Agent moves to sell the estate's partial interest
in the Property to the Buyer.  Subject to Court approval, the
Liquidating Agent has agreed to accept an offer from the Buyer for
the estate's right, title and interest in the Property for the sum
of $187,500, all cash, payable within 14 days of entry of an order
approving the proposed sale unless the time period is extended in
writing by the Liquidating Agent.

Based upon written communication between the Buyer and the
Liquidating Agent, through her counsel, the Liquidating Agent has
agreed to accept the sum of $187,500 in consideration for the
purchase of the estate's right, title and interest in the Property.
The Buyer is purchasing the Property on an "as is, where is"
basis, with no warranties or representations.  The Property is
occupied by a tenant that pays $975 per month; the balance of the
Property is occupied by the Debtors, who use the space for storage
and to run their business.  The Debtors pay no rent.

Prior to the Debtors' occupancy, their portion of the Property was
rented for $1,500 per month.  The Liquidating Agent has no
obligation to remove the existing tenant other than the Debtors.
As described in the Declaration of Michael A. Isaacs in Support of
the Motion, the Debtors have been notified that they need to vacate
the Property and have agreed to do so.  If they fail to vacate as
agreed, an ex parte request under Bankruptcy Code Section 542 will
be filed. The Debtors have agreed to vacate the Property no later
than March 31, 2021.  Any dispute over the terms of the sale
agreement will be resolved by the Court.

The are no consensual liens or encumbrances on the Property.

The Liquidating Agent asks that the sale provide that the order is
effective upon entry and the stay otherwise imposed under Rule
62(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(h) will not apply.

                        About the Squires

Floyd E. Squires, III, and Betty J. Squires filed for chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-10828) on Nov. 8, 2017,
and are represented by David N. Chandler, Esq. of the Law Offices
of David N. Chandler.

Janina M. Hoskins was appointed as examiner of the Debtors on
April
23, 2018.  DENTONS US LLP, led by Michael A. Isaacs, is the
examiner's counsel.



FREEMAN HOLDINGS: $500K Sale of Springdale Property to Arvest OK'd
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Scott M. Grossman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida authorized Freeman Holdings, LLC and
its affiliates to sell the 11,350 sq. ft. single-story medical
office building located at 803 Quandt Ave., in Springdale,
Arkansas, 0.4-acre lot, legally described as Lot 30 Block 1, RL
Hayes Park Addition, City of Springdale, County of Washington,
Parcel No. 815-22544-000, to Arvest Bank for $500,000 credit bid
and the reasonable administrative expense claims incurred by the
Debtors' estate associated with the sale of the Property.

Any remaining objections to the Motion asserted prior to or at the
Final Sale Hearing are overruled too.

The parties are authorized to immediately close and effectuate the
sale of the Property and all transactions set forth therein.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, interests or
encumbrances of any kind or nature whatsoever.  Any liens, claims,
interests, or encumbrances which may exist, will attach to the net
proceeds of the sale of the Property.

The Debtor will immediately serve a copy of the Order pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rules 6004(a), and 2002(a)(2) upon: a) the Office of the
United States Trustee; b) all creditors of the Debtor; c) all
Interest Holders asserting a claim, lien, encumbrance or interest
on or in the Debtors' assets; and d) all parties who have requested
notices pursuant to Rule 2002.  

The Court expressly waives the stay requirement enumerated in
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h) such that entry of the
Order will not be subject to an automatic 14-day stay and such that
this Order is effective immediately.   

                     About Freeman Holdings
  
Freeman Holdings, LLC, and FWP Realty Holdings, LLC sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case Nos. 20-15410 and 20-15412) on May 17, 2020.  At the
time
of the filing, the Debtors each had estimated assets of between
$500,001 and $1 million and liabilities of between $1 million to
$10 million.

Judge Scott M. Grossman oversees the cases. Wernick Law, PLLC is
the Debtor's legal counsel.

On June 25, 2020, the U.S. Trustee said it was unable to appoint
an
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.



FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC: Fitch Alters Outlook on BB+ IDR to Positive
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Freeport-McMoRan Inc.'s (FCX) Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'BB+'. The Rating Outlook is revised to
Positive from Stable. FCX's senior unsecured debt ratings were
affirmed at 'BB+'/'RR4'. Fitch has also affirmed the IDR for
Freeport Minerals Corporation (FMC) at 'BBB-' with a Stable Rating
Outlook, and its senior unsecured debt at 'BBB-'.

FCX's Positive Outlook reflect Fitch's expectations that FCF will
be generally positive, net debt (excluding noncontrolling interest
share of cash) will be about $6.5 billion on average and total
debt/operating EBITDA to trend below 2.5x after 2022.

The ratings reflect FCX's high-quality assets, strong liquidity and
improved capital structure. Substantial advancement of underground
mining at Grasberg provides comfort in the remaining ramp-up and
cash flows to FCX once their economic interest in PT Freeport
Indonesia (PT-FI) drops to about 49% from about 80% beginning in
2023.

The cadence and quantum of spending to satisfy the Indonesian
smelter requirement are important variables in analyzing future
consolidated financial leverage and calls on PT-FI cash flows. An
alternative that alleviates PT-FI's need to build a greenfield
smelter in Indonesia could be credit positive depending on the
treatment and refining charges agreed.

The Rating Outlook could be revised to Stable if Fitch expects
total debt/EBITDA to be sustained in the 2.3x to 3.0x range on a
consolidated basis.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Credit Conscious Financial Policies: On Feb. 2, 2021, FCX announced
a financial policy to allocate cash flows consistent with its
strategic objectives of maintaining a strong balance sheet,
increasing shareholder returns and advancing growth opportunities.
The policy would be implemented after achieving a net debt target
in the range of $3 billion to $4 billion (excluding smelter project
debt) and calls for allocating 50% of available cash flows, after
planned capex and distributions to noncontrolling interests, to
shareholder returns and the balance to debt reduction and
investments in growth projects. FCX also announced reinstatement of
common dividends at an annual rate of $0.30/share (roughly $437
million per year) with the initial dividend expected to be paid on
May 1, 2021.

Net debt was $6.1 billion and Fitch estimates total debt/operating
EBITDA at 2.7x as of Dec. 31, 2020. Fitch does not expect net debt
to reduce further under its rating case but does expect total
debt/operating EBITDA to fall to below 2.5x on a consolidated basis
after 2022. Fitch views the company's net debt target, strategic
objectives and capital allocation policy as supportive of an
investment grade financial profile.

Grasberg Underground Ramp-up Visibility: In 4Q20, ore extracted and
milled from the Grasberg underground mines was 109,300 tonnes per
day up 86% from 4Q19 and 4Q20 annualized metals sales from Grasberg
underground mining were 68% of post ramp-up targets. FCX expects
metals sales to approach 90% of post ramp-up targets by mid-2021.
Spending on the project was about $1 billion in 2020 and is guided
to $1.3 billion in 2021 and $0.9 billion in 2022 of which PT
Indonesia Asahan Aluminum (Inalum) is responsible for contributing
$0.2 billion. Fitch believes the projects are substantially
de-risked and remaining execution risk is manageable.

FCX guides to PT-FI sales volumes of 1.7 billion pounds of copper
and 1.8 million ounces of gold in 2023 when FCX's economic interest
drops to about 49% from about 80% compared with 0.8 billion pounds
of copper and 0.8 million ounces of gold in 2020.

Smelter Debt/Capex: PT-FI committed to construct a new smelter in
Indonesia by Dec. 21, 2023. The preliminary capital cost for the
project was estimated at $3 billion and was expected to be financed
with bank loans at the PT-FI level and consolidated at FCX. PT-FI
has notified the Indonesian government of delays in achieving
completion of the new green field smelter in Gresik as a result of
mobility constraints from pandemic mitigation measures. Fitch does
not expect the delay to impact PT-FI's ability to have its
concentrate export license extended when it expires on March 15,
2021.

PT-FI is in discussion with the majority owner of the existing
smelter in Gresik, Indonesia (25% owned by PT-FI) to increase
concentrate treatment capacity by 30%. Such an expansion would
reduce PT-FI's smelter development commitment to 1.7 million tonnes
from 2 million tonnes of concentrate per year and likely reduce the
capital required. PT-FI would provide the estimated $250 million to
finance the expansion and completion would be expected in 2023.

Third Party Alternative: PT-FI is also in discussion with a third
party to develop new smelter capacity at an alternate location in
partnership with PT-FI. This alternative would not require capital
from PT-FI and would satisfy the smelter commitment but would
require PT-FI to agree to supportive treatment and refining
charges. This smelter would provide the third party with sulfuric
acid for its nickel operations and potentially some downstream
battery operations. Fitch believes this alternative could be credit
positive depending on the treatment and refining charges agreed. A
decision concerning this option is likely in 1H21.

Copper Price Exposure: Copper accounted for 80% of consolidated
revenues in 2020. FCX estimates that a $0.10/pound change in the
price of copper would change operating cash flow by $380 million in
2021. FCX's average realized price per pound of copper was $2.95 in
2020 compared with $2.73 in 2019. Current spot prices are around
$3.76/pound which compares to Fitch's assumptions of $2.72/pound in
2021, $2.81/pound in 2022 and $2.90/pound in 2023 published Aug.
28, 2020.

FCX guides to EBITDA of about $8 billion and operating cash flows
of $5.5 billion in 2021 based on FCX's volume outlook, estimated
unit site production and delivery costs of $1.78/pound of copper
and assuming prices of $3.50/pound of copper, $1,850/ounce of gold
and $9/pound molybdenum.

Favorable Copper Markets: As of Feb. 4, 2021, CRU forecasts the
London Metal Exchange (LME) three-month copper price will average
$7,500/tonne ($3.40/pound) in 2021, which is $2,500/tonne above
cash costs net of by-products for the 90th percentile mine. CRU
expects the market will move to surplus during 2022 through 2024
before moving to deficit in 2025. CRU forecast the LME 3-month
copper price will average $6,700/tonne ($3.04/pound) in 2022 and
$6,875/tonne ($3.12/pound) in 2023.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

FCX's closest operational peer is Southern Copper Corporation (SCC;
BBB+/Stable), given the spread of its copper assets. FCX is less
profitable than SCC and expected to have higher leverage in 2021 as
underground mining at Grasberg continues to ramp up but would
generally have a financial profile consistent with SCC's
longer-term.

FCX's financial profile is expected to be broadly in line with
'BBB' category peers, beginning in 2022 including Anglo American
plc (BBB/Stable), Teck Resources Ltd. (BBB-/Negative), Agnico Eagle
Mines Limited (BBB/Stable) and Kinross Gold Corporation
(BBB-/Positive).

The bulk of debt is at the FCX level or benefits from FCX's
guarantees, with the exception of the $525 million Cerro Verde loan
(not rated) and any future smelter loan at PT-FI. FMC does not
provide upstream guarantees, its notes have no cross-default to FCX
debt, and it is lightly levered, with minimal debt (Cerro Verde is
consolidated at the FMC level).

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the Agency's rating case for the
issuer include:

-- Copper sales at 3.7 billion pounds in 2021 and about 4.2
    billion pounds in 2022 and 2023;

-- Copper prices at $2.72/lb., $2.81/lb. and $2.90/lb. in 2021,
    2022 and 2023, respectively;

-- Gold prices at $1,400/oz in 2021 and $1,200/oz, thereafter;

-- Unit site cost at $1.88/lb. on average in 2021-2023;

-- Capex at FCX guidance in 2021;

-- $500 million, and $1 billion of debt financed green field
    Indonesia smelter expenditure in 2022 and 2023, respectively;

-- Dividends and capital allocation as announced on Feb. 2, 2021.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Visibility on cadence and quantum of capex or treatment and
    refining charge support to satisfy Indonesian smelter
    requirement;

-- Expectations of FFO leverage below 2.8x on a sustained basis;

-- Total debt/EBITDA sustained below 2.3x;

The Rating Outlook could be changed to Stable if Fitch expects
total debt/EBITDA to be sustained in the 2.3x to 3.0x range on a
consolidated basis.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Failure to maintain approval to export concentrate on
    reasonable terms from Indonesia;

-- FFO leverage above 3.5x on a sustained basis;

-- Total debt/EBITDA sustained above 3.0x;

-- Expectations of negative FCF on average.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Robust Liquidity: Fitch expects roughly $500 million of FCF burn in
2021 before contributions from Inalum. Available cash (net of
noncontrolling interest share) was $3.3 billion, and nearly $3.5
billion was available under the revolving credit facility ($10
million utilization for LOCs) at Dec. 31, 2020. Fitch expects
smelter spending to be financed at the PT-FI level and for FCF,
excluding smelter capex, to be generally positive.

Of the $3.5 billion revolver commitment, $3.28 billion matures in
April 2024 and the remaining $220 million matures in April 2023.
Financial covenants under the revolver include a maximum net
debt/EBITDA ratio of 5.25x reverting to 3.75x beginning with the
period ending Sept. 30, 2021 once the Covenant Reversion Notice is
delivered (required prior to declaring dividends). There is also a
minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.25x. Fitch expects the company
to comply with its financial covenants under Fitch's rating case.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS: Seeks Oct. 14 Plan Exclusivity Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors Frontier Communications Corporation and its affiliates ask
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, to
extend the Debtors' exclusive period to file a plan of
reorganization and to solicit acceptances through and including
October 14, 2021, and December 14, 2021, respectively.

The Debtors have made substantial progress throughout these chapter
11 cases and remain focused on their goal of emerging from chapter
11 prior to the end of the first quarter of 2021. As part of this
process, the Debtors have completed the regulatory approval process
in seventeen states and with the FCC, with approval pending in one
final state. The Debtors have been heavily engaged with their
stakeholders throughout these chapter 11 cases and remain focused
on working collaboratively to ensure a smooth path to emergence.
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                                                   
                                         
Also, since the Petition Date, the Debtors have paid their vendors
in the ordinary course of business or as otherwise provided by
orders of the Court. Moreover, throughout these chapter 11 cases,
the Debtors have met their post-petition obligations in the
ordinary course.

The Debtors are seeking the extension of the Exclusivity Periods,
solely out of an abundance of caution in the event that unforeseen
issues arise prior to emergence. Maintaining the status quo at this
critical juncture is of utmost importance as the Debtors and their
stakeholders work toward consummating the Plan, which every
impaired creditor class voted to support and accepted. The
requested extension is appropriate to protect the value and
consensus that has been built by the Debtors and their stakeholders
and will not prejudice any parties in interest.

A copy of the Debtors' Motion to extend is available from
primeclerk.com at https://bit.ly/39X0Qc8 at no extra charge.

                         About Frontier Communications

Frontier Communications Corporation (NASDAQ: FTR) offers a variety
of services to residential and business customers over its
fiber-optic and copper networks in 29 states, including video,
high-speed internet, advanced voice, and Frontier Secure digital
protection solutions.

Frontier Communications Corporation and 103 related entities sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-22476) on
April 14, 2020.  

Judge Robert D. Drain oversees the cases. The Debtors tapped
Kirkland & Ellis LLP as legal counsel; Evercore as financial
advisor; and FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring advisor. Prime
Clerk is the claims agent, maintaining the page
http://www.frontierrestructuring.com/and
https://cases.primeclerk.com/ftr.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors in Debtors' Chapter 11 cases. The committee
tapped Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its counsel; Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC as financial advisor; and UBS
Securities LLC as an investment banker.


GALAXY NEXT: Incurs $7.8 Million Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Galaxy Next Generation, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss
of $7.77 million on $798,793 of revenues for the three months ended
Dec. 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $2.82 million on $876,529
of revenues for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

For the six months ended Dec. 31, 2020, the Company reported a net
loss of $20.90 million on $1.98 million of revenues compared to a
net loss of $4.84 million on $1.50 million of revenues for the six
months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $5.62 million in total assets,
$13.31 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $7.68 million.

"The pandemic has not had a substantial net impact to our
consolidated operating results or our liquidity position so far in
fiscal year 2021.  However, we have experienced supply chain delays
due to the pandemic.  In addition, increased product demand has
resulted in our increased need for additional funding.  We continue
to meet our short-term liquidity needs from revenue derived from
product sales supplemented with proceeds from issuances of debt and
equity, and we expect to maintain access to the capital markets.
To date in fiscal year 2021, we have not observed any impairments
of our assets or a significant change in the fair value of assets
due to the pandemic.  We intend to continue to work with our
employees and customers to implement safety measures to ensure that
we are able to continue manufacturing and installing our products,"
Galaxy Next said.

"However, given the global economic slowdown, and the other risks
and uncertainties associated with the pandemic, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects
could be materially adversely affected.  The extent to which the
COVID-19 pandemic impacts our business, the business of our
suppliers and other commercial partners, our corporate development
objectives, our ability to access capital and the value of and
market for our common stock par value $0.001 per share ... will
depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot
be predicted with confidence at this time, such as the ultimate
duration of the pandemic, travel restrictions, quarantines, social
distancing and business closure requirements in the United States
and other countries, and the effectiveness of actions taken
globally to contain and treat the disease," Galaxy Next said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1127993/000109181821000020/gaxy02122021form10q.htm

                     About Galaxy Next Generation

Headquartered in Toccoa, Georgia, Galaxy Next Generation, Inc. --
http://www.galaxynext.us-- is a manufacturer and distributor of
interactive learning technologies and enhanced audio solutions. It
develops both hardware and software that allows the presenter and
participant to engage in a fully collaborative instructional
environment.

Galaxy Next reported a net loss of $14.03 million for the year
ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $6.66 million for
the year ended June 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company
had $5.21 million in total assets, $11.34 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $6.13 million.

Somerset CPAs PC, in Indianapolis, Indiana, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Sept. 28, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


GALLERIA OF ST. MATTHEWS: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Galleria of St. Matthews, LLC
        173 Sears Avenue
        Suite 180
        Louisville, KY 40207

Business Description: Galleria of St. Matthews, LLC is a Single
                      Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined in 11
                      U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The Debtor is the
                      owner of a fee simple title to a property
                      located at 4101-4127 Oechsli Avenue
                      Louisville, Kentucky valued at $1.75
                      million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Kentucky

Case No.: 21-30360

Judge: Hon. Charles R. Merrill

Debtor's Counsel: Charity S. Bird, Esq.
                  KAPLAN JOHNSON ABATE & BIRD LLP
                  710 West Main Street
                  Fourth Floor
                  Louisville, KY 40202
                  Tel: (502) 540-8285
                  Fax: (502) 540-8282
                  E-mail: cbird@kaplanjohnsonlaw.com

Total Assets: $1,817,376

Total Liabilities: $4,024,374

The petition was signed by Enrique L. Pantoja, manager.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 15 unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/FOZAWHI/Galleria_of_St_Matthews_LLC__kywbke-21-30360__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


GB SCIENCES: Incurs $594K Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
------------------------------------------------------------
GB Sciences, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $593,984
on zero sales revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2020,
compared to net income of $984,147 on zero sales revenue for the
three months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

For the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2020, the Company reported a net
loss of $3.25 million on zero sales revenue compared to a net loss
of $4.48 million on zero sales revenue for the nine months ended
Dec. 31, 2019.

As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $10.25 million in total
assets, $12.74 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $2.49 million.

The Company has sustained net losses since inception, which have
caused an accumulated deficit of $(100,650,610) at Dec. 31, 2020.
The Company had a working capital deficit of $(6,135,112) at Dec.
31, 2020, net of working capital of $969,498 classified as
discontinued operations, compared to $(3,884,877) at March 31,
2020, net of working capital of $349,195 classified as discontinued
operations.  In addition, the Company has consumed cash in its
operating activities of $(1,253,180) for the nine months ended Dec.
31, 2020, including $21,098 provided by discontinued operations,
compared to $(4,248,291) including $(1,533,341) used in
discontinued operations for the nine months ended Dec. 31, 2019.
These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

"Management has been able, thus far, to finance the losses through
a public offering, private placements and obtaining operating funds
from stockholders.  The Company is continuing to seek sources of
financing.  There are no assurances that the Company will be
successful in achieving its goals.

"Furthermore, Management believes the COVID-19 pandemic may have a
significant impact on the Company's business.  The pandemic
presents a risk to the global economy, and it is possible that it
could have an impact on the operations of the Company in the near
term that could materially impact the Company's financials and
ability to continue as a going concern.  Management has not been
able to measure the potential financial impact on the Company and
continues to monitor the impact of the pandemic closely, although
the extent to which the COVID-19 outbreak will impact our
operations, financing ability or future financial results is
uncertain.

"In view of these conditions, the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional
financing or capital sources, to meet its financing requirements,
and ultimately to achieve profitable operations.  Management
believes that its current and future plans provide an opportunity
to continue as a going concern," GB Sciences said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1165320/000143774921002961/gblx20201231_10q.htm

                          About GB Sciences

GB Sciences, Inc. seeks to be a biopharmaceutical research and
cannabinoid-based drug development company whose goal is to create
patented formulations for safe, standardized, cannabinoid therapies
that target a variety of medical conditions in both the
pharmaceutical and wellness markets.  The Company is engaged in the
research and development of cannabinoid medicines and plans to
produce cannabinoid therapies for the wellness markets based on its
portfolio of intellectual property.

GB Sciences reported a net loss of $13.11 million for the year
ended March 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $24.68 million for
the year ended ended March 31, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the
Company had $14.25 million in total assets, $16.60 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $2.35 million.

Assurance Dimensions, in Margate, Florida, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Aug. 27, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses.  For the year ended March 31, 2020 the Company had a net
loss, had net cash used in operating activities of $4,479,713, and
had negative working capital of $3,884,877.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


GLENROY COACHELLA: Lender Asks Court to Appoint Chapter 11 Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------------
Allison McNeely of Bloomberg News reports that the lender to a
bankrupt Coachella hotel project is asking the court to appoint a
neutral party to oversee the restructuring amid allegations of
fraud and mismanagement, including diverting funds for a cannabis
dispensary.

Stuart Rubin, manager of Glenroy Coachella, and investor Elliot
Lander allegedly induced U.S. Real Estate Credit Holdings III-A LP
to provide a $24.4 million construction loan for the luxury hotel,
but understated the budget by about $20 million and misused project
funds for personal gain, according to the motion filed by the
lender, which is managed by Calmwater Asset Management.

                    About Glenroy Coachella

Glenroy Coachella LLC is the owner of the unfinished Hotel Indigo
Coachella, a lavish hotel development in Coachella, California.
Hotel Indigo Coachella was billed as a luxe, 35-acre resort close
to the site of Coachella, the famous California music festival.
The hotel was to have a DJ stage, catwalk, 10,000-square-foot
(3,049 square meter) pool, casitas and 250 guest rooms.

Construction on the project began in early 2017 but the project
faced delays.  Stuart Rubin, manager of the project, has been hit
with a lawsuit from his business partner, Gary Stiffelman, for $50
million amid allegations of "incompetence and fraud."

Glenroy Coachella sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 21-11188) on Feb. 15, 2021.  In the petition signed by
Stuart Rubin, manager, the Debtor estimated assets of $50 million
to $100 million and debt of $10 million to $50 million.  The Hon.
Sheri Bluebond is the case judge.  WEINTRAUB & SELTH, APC, led by
David J. Weintraub, is the Debtor's counsel.


GRUPO AEROMEXICO: Shareholders May Get "Very Little or No" Value
----------------------------------------------------------------
Grupo Aeroméxico, S.A.B. de C.V. (BMV:  AEROMEX) warned
shareholders that they may recoup very little or no value once that
the company confirms its restructuring plan in the U.S.

"The price of our common stock has been volatile following the
commencement of our Chapter 11 process and may significantly
decrease in value in the future.  Therefore, any trading in our
common stock during the pendency of our Chapter 11 process is
highly speculative and involves substantial risks to buyers of our
stock.  Future recoveries in our Chapter 11 process for our
shareholders will depend upon our ability to negotiate and confirm
a Plan of Reorganization, the terms of such Plan, the recovery of
our business from the COVID-19 pandemic and the future value of our
assets upon conversion of our liabilities.  Although at this stage
we cannot predict how our common stock will eventually be treated
under a Plan, we believe that it is unlikely that stockholders
would receive a recovery through aPlan since it is expected that
the holders of unsecured indebtedness will not be paid in full and
will need to convert their claims into new stock to be issued by
the  Company.  Consequently, there is a significant risk that our
stockholders may receive no recovery, or a nominal recovery, under
our Chapter 11 process," the airline said in its Feb. 19 press
release.

The Company announced in its Feb. 19 press release that as a follow
up to its previous relevant events regarding (a) securing the
commitment of a US$1,000 million senior secured superpriority
multi-tranche debtor in possession term loan facility (the "DIP
Facility"), (b) the initial funding of US$100 million of Tranche 1
loans under the DIP Facility, (c) the final approval of the DIP
Facility by Judge Shelley C. Chapman of the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the
"Chapter 11 Court"), and (d) the second disbursement of the undrawn
portion of the Tranche 1 facility (US$100 million) and of the
initial funding of US$175 million of Tranche 2 loans, the Company
announces that the conditions to drawing the remaining undrawn
commitments of the Tranche 2 facility (US$625million) have been met
and, accordingly, the Company has requested such final
disbursement.

Andres Conesa, CEO of Aeromexico, commented: "The funding of the
final disbursement is a key milestone in Aeromexico's ongoing,
voluntary restructuring process that will provide us with
sufficient liquidity to support our continued operations during
this time and with the flexibility to continue our orderly
restructuring process with the objective of emerging stronger.  We
recognize and appreciate the  continuing support from my fellow
co-workers, Board of Directors,  authorities and all
stakeholders."

The Tranche 2 DIP Facility may be converted, at the lenders'
option,  into shares of reorganized Aeromexico, subject to certain
conditions and the applicable corporate and regulatory approvals
(including at the Aeromexico's shareholders meeting) for the
issuance of the corresponding shares.  In order to effectuate (i)
the debt-into-equity conversion of the allowed unsecured claims
recognized in our Chapter 11 process at a to-be-determined ratio,
and (ii) the conversion of the Tranche 2 DIP Facility, the
shareholders meeting of the Company would need to approve a capital
increase.  As it had anticipated, if the lenders exercise the
option to convert the Tranche 2 DIP Facility, following the
corresponding capital increase, the shareholders will be almost
fully diluted so that their remaining equity stake will likely be
minimal (if any), provided that shareholders (other than those that
have agreed not to exercise preemptive rights pursuant to the
Shareholder Support Agreement) will be allowed to exercise their
preemptive rights subject to several conditions that are yet to be
determined.

                     About Grupo Aeromexico

Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. -- https://www.aeromexico.com/ --
is a holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in commercial
aviation in Mexico and the promotion of passenger loyalty
programs.

Aeromexico, Mexico's global airline, has its main hub at Terminal 2
at the Mexico City International Airport.  Its destinations network
features the United States, Canada, Central America, South America,
Asia and Europe.

Grupo Aeromexico and three of its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11563) on June 30,
2020. In the petitions signed by CFO Ricardo Javier Sanchez Baker,
the Debtors reported consolidated assets and liabilities of $1
billion to $10 billion.

Timothy Graulich, Esq., of Davis Polk and Wardell LLP, serves as
counsel to the Debtors.


GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Considers Pre-Packaged Chapter 11 to Cut Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GTT Communications is reported to be considering a bankruptcy
filing to solve its debt woes.

Katherine Doherty and Allison McNeely of Bloomberg News report that
GTT Communications Inc. is considering filing for bankruptcy with a
pre-negotiated restructuring plan to help it trim its more than $3
billion debt load.

Bloomberg, citing people with knowledge of the matter, said that
the telecommunications company hasn't yet made formal plans but is
likely to file for Chapter 11 court protection after it closes the
sale of its infrastructure unit later this 2021.  

The Company has been shifting to the cloud and announced the sale
of its infrastructure business to I Squared Capital for $3.15
billion in October 2020.

GTT Communications in December announced it has entered into a
commitment letter through which certain of GTT's existing lenders
and noteholders have committed to providing the company with a new
$275 million delayed-draw term loan facility

                   About GTT Communications

Based in Tysons, Virginia, GTT Communications Inc. (NYSE:GTT)
operates a global communications network, providing
telecommunications services to large, multinational enterprises,
carriers, and governments across five continents.  On the Web:
HTTP://www.gtt.net/


GULFPORT ENERGY: Committee Wants Note Claims in Separate Class
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Gulfport Energy
Corporation and its affiliated debtors filed on Feb. 16, 2021, an
emergency motion for entry of an order determining that classifying
notes claims in Class 4A and 4B under the Debtors' RSA Plan is
impermissible under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1122.

On Nov. 24, 2020, the Debtors filed their proposed RSA Plan and
related Disclosure Statement.  The RSA Plan contemplates just two
separate classes of general unsecured creditors: (1) Class 4A which
includes General Unsecured Claims against Gulfport Parent, and (2)
Class 4B, which includes General Unsecured Claims against Gulfport
Subsidiaries.

The Plan contemplates that general unsecured creditors of the
subsidiary debtors will receive the $550 million take-back notes,
rights offering subscription rights, and 94% of new common stock of
the reorganized Gulfport parent entity, while general unsecured
creditors of the parent debtor will receive only 6% of the new
common stock.  The Notes Claims have agreed to waive recoveries on
account of their claims against Gulfport Parent once they receive
94% of the New Common Stock.

While the filed version of the Disclosure Statement does not
include any estimates of General Unsecured Claims in Classes 4A and
4B, the Committee says information from the Debtors indicates that
(i) the Notes Claims of approximately $1.824 billion are estimated
to represent essentially the entirety of allowed General Unsecured
Claims against the Gulfport Subsidiaries, and (ii) the Debtors
currently estimate, in addition to the $1.8 billion in Notes
Claims, other General Unsecured Claims against Gulfport Parent of
between $350 to $800 million.  Thus, if allowed to vote their
claims in full, the Notes Claims will constitute approximately 70%
to 84% of all voting claims in Class 4A and 100% of the voting
claims in Class 4B.

According to the Committee, the Debtors' proposed RSA Plan violates
the straightforward requirement under Sec. 1122(a), placing notes
claims and other general unsecured claims in the same class despite
their material differences.  Both sets of claims are unsecured, but
that is where the similarities end, the Committee says, pointing
out that:

   * Holders of Notes Claims have guaranty claims against the
Gulfport Subsidiaries -– other general unsecured creditors do
not.

   * Noteholders are slated to receive both equity (preferred and
common) and debt primarily on account of their claims against the
subsidiaries -- other general unsecured creditors of the parent
will receive only equity, taking priority behind the Noteholders'
recoveries.

   * Members of the ad hoc noteholder group, comprising over
two-thirds of the Notes Claims, have agreed to the broad estate and
third-party releases contained in the Debtors' RSA Plan -- other
general unsecured creditors have not.

   * Ad Hoc Group members have received material inducements to
support the Debtors' RSA Plan in the form of payment of
professional fees and participation in the backstop of the Rights
Offering and the Rights Offering itself -- other general unsecured
creditors have not.

"The Debtors' motivations for their classification scheme are
transparent: they know that by lumping all general unsecured claims
together, the votes of the noteholders that are party to the
restructuring support agreement (the "RSA") will almost certainly
be sufficient to carry the unsecured creditor classes. This would
appear to be an attempt to limit arguments that unsecured creditors
not party to the RSA may raise at confirmation.  The
disenfranchisement of non-noteholder general unsecured creditors,
while undoubtedly convenient for the Debtors and the parties to the
RSA, is barred by the Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, before wasting
the time and the limited estate resources soliciting a
non-confirmable plan, the Committee brings this motion pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 3013 seeking an order compelling the Debtors to
properly classify the claims of non-noteholder general unsecured
creditors," Jason L. Boland, Esq., at Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
tells the Court.

                     About Gulfport Energy

Gulfport Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: GPOR) --
http://www.gulfportenergy.com/-- is an independent natural gas and
oil company focused on the exploration and development of natural
gas and oil properties in North America and a producer of natural
gas in the contiguous United States.  Headquartered in Oklahoma
City, Gulfport holds significant acreage positions in the Utica
Shale of Eastern Ohio and the SCOOP Woodford and SCOOP Springer
plays in Oklahoma. In addition, Gulfport holds non-core assets that
include an approximately 22% equity interest in Mammoth Energy
Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) and has a position in the Alberta Oil
Sands in Canada through its 25% interest in Grizzly Oil Sands ULC.

As of Sept. 30, 2020, Gulfport had $2,375,559,000 in assets and
$2,520,336,000 in liabilities.

Gulfport and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-35562) on Nov. 13, 2020.

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel; Jackson Walker L.L.P. as local bankruptcy counsel; Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC as restructuring advisor; and Perella
Weinberg Partners L.P. and Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. as
financial advisor; and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as tax services
provider.  Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC is the claims agent.

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is counsel for the special committee
of Gulfport's Board of Directors while Chilmark Partners is the
financial advisor.

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is counsel for the special committee of
the governing body of each Debtor other than Gulfport while M III
Partners, LP is the financial advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee formed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  The
Committee is represented by Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP and Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP.


GULFPORT ENERGY: UCC Says Disclosures Have Glaring Deficiencies
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Gulfport Energy
Corporation and its affiliated debtors objects to the Debtors'
motion seeking entry of an order approving the adequacy of the
Disclosure Statement.

The Committee claims that the Debtors' Disclosure Statement
contains glaring deficiencies and misleading statements regarding
the proposed treatment for unsecured creditors under the RSA Plan.
The deficiencies would appear to be just the example of the
Debtors' unwillingness or inability to provide their stakeholders
with information necessary to make informed judgments.

The Committee points out that it would appear the Debtors made no
public disclosure of the 2019 Dropdown Transaction either prior to
or at the time of its consummation, and subsequently made only
passing reference to the billion dollar transaction in their Form
10-Q based on the Committee's investigation.

The Committee asserts that the Disclosure Statement is entirely
devoid of any description of the estate claims and the impact of
their purported settlement and release through the Plan.  Nor does
the Disclosure Statement adequately inform unsecured creditors of
what they could receive if any of these claims were successfully
pursued.

The Committee further asserts that the RSA Plan improperly
classifies the unsecured claims of the noteholders together with
the other general unsecured claims of the Parent in a single class,
Class 4A, in violation of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1122(a).

The Committee states that parent-only unsecured creditors are
limited to receiving only up to 6% of the reorganized equity, an
equity whose value is diminished by the issuance of unsecured notes
and preferred shares. Unless the RSA Plan is revised to address
this blatant engineering of votes, the Disclosure Statement should
not be approved.

Finally, Parent creditors must be told what they will actually
receive under the proposed Plan, as opposed to eliding the issue of
disparate treatment by saying only in general terms that Parent
creditors will receive a share of the consideration to be provided
to all unsecured creditors.  Absent inclusion of such information,
the Disclosure Statement contains inadequate information and should
not be approved.

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

     NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
     William R. Greendyke
     Jason L. Boland
     Kristian W. Gluck
     1301 McKinney, Suite 5100
     Houston, TX 77010-3095
     Telephone: (713) 651-5151
     E-mail: william.greendyke@nortonrosefulbright.com
             jason.boland@nortonrosefulbright.com
             kristian.gluck@nortonrosefulbright.com

             - and -

     KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
     Douglas H. Mannal, Esq.
     P. Bradley O'Neill, Esq.
     Rachael L. Ringer, Esq.
     David E. Blabey Jr.
     1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036
     Telephone: (212) 715-9100
     E-mail: dmannal@kramerlevin.com
             boneill@kramerlevin.com
             rringer@kramerlevin.com
             dblabey@kramerlevin.com
         
                About Gulfport Energy Corp.

Gulfport Energy Corporation (NASDAQ: GPOR) --
http://www.gulfportenergy.com/-- is an independent natural gas and
oil company focused on the exploration and development of natural
gas and oil properties in North America and a producer of natural
gas in the contiguous United States.  Headquartered in Oklahoma
City, Gulfport holds significant acreage positions in the Utica
Shale of Eastern Ohio and the SCOOP Woodford and SCOOP Springer
plays in Oklahoma.  In addition, Gulfport holds non-core assets
that include an approximately 22% equity interest in Mammoth Energy
Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) and has a position in the Alberta Oil
Sands in Canada through its 25% interest in Grizzly Oil Sands ULC.

As of Sept. 30, 2020, Gulfport had $2,375,559,000 in assets and
$2,520,336,000 in liabilities.

Gulfport and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-35562) on Nov. 13, 2020.

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel; Jackson Walker L.L.P. as local bankruptcy counsel; Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC as restructuring advisor; and Perella
Weinberg Partners L.P. and Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. as
financial advisor; and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as tax services
provider.  Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC is the claims agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases on Nov. 27,
2020.  The committee tapped Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP and
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP as its legal counsel, and
Conway MacKenzie, LLC, as its financial advisor.

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz is counsel for the special committee
of Gulfport's Board of Directors while Chilmark Partners is the
financial advisor.

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is counsel for the special committee of
the governing body of each Debtor other than Gulfport while M III
Partners, LP is the financial advisor.


HAJJAR BUSINESS: Can Use Cash Collateral Until May 25
-----------------------------------------------------
Judge John K. Sherwood of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey authorized Hajjar Business Holdings, LLC and
its affiliated Debtors to use cash collateral on an interim basis
until May 25, 2021.

The Court held that the Debtors' use of cash collateral should not
exceed any line item on the Budget by an amount exceeding 5% of
each such line item.  The Court added the Debtors may make
expenditures up to 5% in excess of the total budgeted expenses for
that month in the Budget so long as actual disbursements do not
exceed 105% of the budgeted total expenses for such month of the
Budget.

The approved Budget provided for total operating expenses in the
amount of $265,150.33 for the month of February, $248,486.80 for
the month of March, and $250,800.33 for the month of April.

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2016 C34, Commercial Mortgage
Pass Through Certificates, Series 2016 C34, was named as Secured
Lender in the Debtors' original cash collateral motion, taking over
from Natixis Real Estate Capital, LLC, which originally issued an
$81,500,000 commercial loan back in 2016.

Wilmington Trust, National Association, serves as Trustee for the
Benefit of the Registered Holders of Wells Fargo Commercial
Mortgage Trust 2016-C34, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2016-C34.  Wilmington Trust as a secured
creditor has challenged the Debtors' continued use of cash
collateral on several occasions.

"Since the last Cash Collateral Order, there is a small shortfall
of $11,284.62 plus a small tax shortfall of $12,559.29 for the
Adequate Protection Payments that were due and owing for the months
of November, December, and January.  As a condition to the Debtors'
use of Cash Collateral, the Secured Creditor needs these
shortfalls, in the aggregate amount of $23,843.91, to be paid.  The
Debtors have requested (and the Secured Creditor has agreed) that
this shortfall can be paid from the proceeds from the sale of the
Wayne Property.  In addition, the Debtors have requested (and the
Secured Creditor has agreed) to pay the Debtors' upcoming insurance
premium...  as the Debtors' current insurance policies expire on
April 29, 2021.  Within five business days of the entry of this
Order, subject to Secured Creditor's receipt of an appropriate
invoice evidencing the cost of the Annual Renewal Premium, Secured
Creditor will pay the Annual Renewal Premium directly to the
Debtors' insurer (the "Direct Insurance Payment") from the proceeds
of the sale of the Wayne Property," Judge Sherwood said.

The Secured Lender was granted adequate protection of its interest
in the collateral securing the Debtors' obligations under the Loan
Documents, including the Cash Collateral, for and equal in amount
to the amount of Cash Collateral used from and after the Petition
Date, and the aggregate diminution in the value of the Secured
Lender's interests in the Prepetition Collateral from and after the
Petition Date, including any such diminution resulting from (a) the
use of Cash Collateral, (b) the sale, lease, or use by the Debtors
(or other decline in value) of the Prepetition Collateral, and (c)
the imposition of the automatic stay under section 362 of the
Bankruptcy Code.  

As adequate protection, the Secured Lender will receive (i) the
monthly tax escrow due and owing under the Loan Documents in the
approximate amount of $138,300.21; plus (ii) the Secured Lender's
monthly interest payment in the amount of $341,482.41 per month
representing interest at the non-default rate due and owing to the
Secured Lender under the Loan Documents, after application of the
proceeds resulting from the sale of the Debtors' property located
in Wayne, New Jersey.  The Adequate Protection Payments will be due
no later than the 15th of each month, beginning on February 15,
2021.

The Secured Lender was granted an allowed, superpriority
administrative expense claim under section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code with respect to the Adequate Protection Obligations. The
Superpriority Claim shall have priority over all administrative
expenses of the kind specified in, or ordered pursuant to, any
provision of the Bankruptcy Code, including, without limitation,
those specified in, or ordered pursuant to, sections 326, 328, 330,
503(b), 506(c), 507(a), 507(b), 546(c), 726, and 1114 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

A final hearing or a further interim hearing on the Debtors'
continued use of cash collateral will be conducted by the Court on
May 18, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.  The deadline for the filing of
objections to the Debtors' use of cash collateral is scheduled on
May 11, 2021 at 4 p.m.

A copy of the Court's order is available at https://bit.ly/2ZNu7Ah
from PacerMonitor.com.

Wilmington Trust is represented by:

     Sommer L. Ross, Esq.
     DUANE MORRIS LLP
     222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1600
     Wilmington, DE 19801-1659
     Telephone: (302) 657-4900
     Facsimile: (302) 657-4901
     E-mail: slross@duanemorris.com

          - and -

     Lawrence J. Kotler, Esq.
     DUANE MORRIS LLP
     30 S. 17th Street
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     Telephone: (215) 979-1514
     Facsimile: (215) 689-2746
     E-mail: ljkotler@duanemorris.com

                    About Hajjar Business Holdings

Hajjar Business Holdings, LLC and 12 of its affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 20-12465) on Feb. 13, 2020.  At the time of the filing,
Hajjar Business Holdings was estimated to have assets of between
$100,000 to $500,000 and liabilities of between $50 million to $100
million.  Judge John K. Sherwood oversees the Debtors' cases.
Anthony Sodono, III, Esq. and Sari B. Placona, Esq., of McManimon,
Scotland & Baumann, LLC, serve as counsel to the Debtors.



HARGRAY HOLDINGS: S&P Places 'B+' ICR on CreditWach Positive
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed the ratings on Hilton Head, S.C.-based
Hargray Holdings LLC, including the 'B+' issuer credit rating, on
CreditWatch with positive implications.

The CreditWatch placement reflects S&P's view that the transaction
could improve Hargray's credit profile because Cable One is rated
higher.

The CreditWatch placement follows Cable One's (BB/Positive/--)
offer to acquire the remaining 85% stake in Hargray it does not
already own. Cable One plans to finance the transaction with a
combination of balance sheet cash, revolving credit facility
capacity, and proceeds from new debt and/or equity capital. While
specific funding plans were not disclosed, Cable One will enter
into a $900 million bridge loan. S&P said, "We expect the
transaction to close in the second quarter of 2021. While Hargray's
existing secured debt has change-of-control provisions, if Cable
One gets a waiver and the debt is rolled over, we would notch it
off the equalized issuer-credit rating."

The acquisition of Hargray will expand Cable One's footprint in the
southeastern U.S. and penetration of commercial customers. Hargray
also has limited competition across its incumbent service
territories.

S&P expects to resolve the CreditWatch when the acquisition closes,
most likely in the second quarter, and will likely raise the
ratings on Hargray equal to our ratings on Cable One.



HARLEY-DAVIDSON: Egan-Jones Lowers Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on February 11, 2021, downgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by Harley-Davidson Incorporated to BB from BB+.

Headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Harley-Davidson, Inc.
designs, manufactures, and sells motorcycles.



HCA HEALTHCARE: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB-
----------------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on February 11, 2021, upgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by HCA Healthcare to BB- from B+.

Headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, HCA Inc/Old. HCA Inc. of
Delaware owns, manages, and operates hospitals.



HERBALIFE NUTRITION: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Ba3 CFR
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Herbalife's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating reflects its niche product
and service offering and its history of debt financed share
buybacks. The rating is further constrained by the inherent
challenges of operating a multi-level marketing organization. The
company's long term rating is supported by good profitability and
cash flow, relatively modest financial leverage, and excellent
geographic diversification.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


HILLMAN COS: S&P Assigns Prelim 'B+' Rating on $1.035BB Term Loans
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary 'B+' issue-level rating
and '2' recovery rating to The Hillman Cos. Inc.'s proposed $1.035
billion senior secured facility due 2028 consisting of an $835
million first-lien term loan and $200 million first-lien
delayed-draw term loan (assumed undrawn at close).

S&P said, "The '2' recovery rating indicates our expectation for
substantial recovery (70%-90%; rounded estimate: 80%). We assume
the $200 million delayed-draw term loan will be undrawn at close,
and we have not factored the proposed $150 million first-lien term
loan B-2 into our analysis because we do not expect it to be funded
at close. We would reassess the ratings if either the $200 million
delayed-draw term loan or $150 million term loan B-2 are drawn. The
latter facility will only be funded in the event special-purpose
acquisition company (SPAC) redemptions well exceed expectations. We
expect redemptions to be minimal and instead likely funded with
cash from the balance sheet."

Hillman will use the $835 million net proceeds to fully refinance
existing debt in connection with its planned merger with SPAC
Landcadia Holdings III Inc. The new term loan B-1, about $500
million SPAC cash held in trust, $375 million in private investment
in public equity proceeds, and $22 million cash will fund $1.5
billion in debt paydown, $91 million in fees, and put about $96
million cash to the balance sheet. The existing sponsor owners will
roll over $911 million in common equity.

S&P said, "We are affirming our existing issue-level ratings. The
'B-' issuer credit rating remain on CreditWatch with positive
implications. We will withdraw our existing issue-level ratings
upon the close of the transaction. If the SPAC merger closes in
accordance with our expectations, resulting in a $710 million net
debt reduction, we estimate pro forma leverage to decline to 4.5x
from around 8x for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2020.
Subsequently, we expect leverage to decline to about 4x in fiscal
2021 as we revised our forecast adjusted EBITDA margin expansion to
16%-16.5% from 15%-15.5% in 2020 from stronger product mix.

"Upon close of the SPAC merger, we expect to raise the issuer
credit rating to 'B' due to deleveraging. Our 'B+' preliminary
ratings on the proposed debt is notched off those expectations. If
we expect the final capital structure to materially differ or the
company to issue debt under the proposed $200 million delayed-draw
or $150 million facilities, we could reassess our preliminary
ratings on the senior secured debt."

ISSUE RATINGS - RECOVERY ANALYSIS

The company's capital structure includes:

-- $250 million asset-based lending (ABL) facility due in 2026,

-- $835 million first-lien term loan B-1 facility due in 2028;
and

-- $200 million first-lien delayed-draw term loan tranche with
availability expiring in 2023, assumed undrawn at close.

Key analytical factors

-- Hillman is a U.S.-based company, and substantially all its
assets and operations are in the U.S. In the event of payment
default, S&P believes a bankruptcy protection filing would be in
the U.S. under the administration of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
system, while entities abroad, if any, remain out of insolvency
proceedings with respect to local jurisdictions.

-- S&P believes creditors would receive maximum recovery in a
payment default scenario if the company reorganized instead of
liquidated. This is because of the company's scale and leading
market positions in its categories and brands, which are well
recognized by retailers and industry trade customers. Therefore, in
evaluating recovery prospects for debtholders, we assume the
company continues as a going concern and arrive at its emergence
enterprise value (EV) by applying a multiple to our assumed
emergence EBITDA.

-- The first-lien term loan facility has a perfected
first-priority security interest in substantially all assets of the
borrower and guarantors and second-priority lien on ABL collateral.
The ABL has perfected first-priority liens on cash, accounts
receivable, inventory, and general intangibles, and a
second-priority lien on term loan collateral. Guarantors under both
facilities are all existing and future wholly-owned and domestic
subsidiaries of the borrower.

Simulated default assumptions

S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a default in 2024,
reflecting the loss of revenue due to the loss of one or more top
customers. At the same time, difficulties could result from a
severe downtown in the macroeconomic environment and U.S. housing
market. These factors ultimately would lead to lower revenue, cash
flow, and liquidity, and a default in 2024.

Calculation of EBITDA at emergence

-- Debt service assumption: $60.3 million (assumed default year
interest and amortization)

-- Minimum capital expenditures assumption: $20.2 million

-- Preliminary emergence EBITDA: $80.5 million

-- Cyclicality adjustment: $4 million (5%)

-- Operational adjustment: $71.9 million (85%)

-- Gross valuation: $860.2 million, assuming a 5.5x EBITDA
multiple given the company's niche product categories

Simplified waterfall

-- Emergence EBITDA: $156.4 million

-- Multiple: 5.5x

-- Gross recovery value: $860.2 million

-- Net recovery value for waterfall after administrative expenses
(5%): $817.2 million

-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 90%/10%

-- Collateral value available to secured first-lien debt: $635.4
million

-- First-lien secured debt claims: $816.1 billion

    --Recovery range for senior secured debt: 70%-90% (rounded
estimate: 80%)

All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.


HILLMAN SOLUTIONS: Fitch Assigns Expected 'BB-(EXP)' LongTerm IDR
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Hillman Solutions Corp. (HLMN) an
Expected Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'BB-(EXP)'. The
Rating Outlook is Stable. Fitch has also assigned an expected
rating of 'BB(EXP)'/'RR2(EXP)' to The Hillman Group, Inc's proposed
$835 million senior secured term loan and $200 million senior
secured delayed draw term loan.

Fitch has assigned expected ratings in connection with the
acquisition of HLMN by the special purpose acquisition company
Landcadia III Holdings, Inc. HLMN plans to use proceeds from the
transaction and a new credit facility to refinance its existing
debt structure. The transaction is expected to be completed in
2Q2021.

Fitch currently rates The Hillman Companies, Inc and The Hillman
Group, Inc's LT IDRs 'CCC+'/Rating Watch Positive (RWP). Ratings
for the existing first-lien secured term loan (B-/RR3) and senior
unsecured bonds (CCC-/RR6) are also on RWP.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Ratings and Transaction: Fitch's ratings assume that The Hillman
Companies, Inc. and The Hillman Group, Inc's existing debt
structure will be entirely replaced at the time of the transaction,
resulting in debt at closing of around $835 million. At that time,
Fitch would upgrade the LT IDR of The Hillman Group, Inc. to be in
line with the Hillman Solutions. Corp's final LT IDR.

The final ratings will be dependent on the success of the
transaction and the amount of share redemptions, which could, in
turn, drive an incremental $150 million of debt, based on lender's
current backstopping support. Should the transaction be completed
with part or full utilization of the $150 million of backstop
funding, the IDR and debt ratings could be lowered one notch.

Meaningfully Lower Leverage: Provided the transaction is completed
as planned, Fitch expects leverage (debt/EBITDA) to decline to the
mid-3.0x range in 2021 from the 6.8x expected at fiscal year-end
2020. In addition, Fitch expects the company to maintain more
moderate financial leverage going forward. Fitch anticipates an
ongoing level of bolt-on acquisitions that could limit further
deleveraging but should not push leverage materially higher.

Strengthening FCF: Cash flow generation and financial flexibility
will also improve with substantially lower interest costs. Fitch
believes FCF margins (excluding anticipated transaction costs)
could improve to the mid-single-digits compared with negative to
break-even FCF over 2018-2019, assuming steady EBITDA margins
around 16%. FFO interest coverage is also expected to meaningfully
improve to the mid-4x range compared to the low 2x range in 2020.

Strong Performance Through the Pandemic: HLMN has performed better
than previously expected, reflecting strength in home repair and
remodeling markets driving growth in fasteners and personal
protective supplies, leading to low double-digit revenue growth in
2020. Growth in these markets may moderate in 2021 even as other
businesses that were negatively impacted by the pandemic such as
HLMN's full-service key replication would likely improve.

Historically Muted Cyclicality: Fitch believes the company's
cyclicality will be relatively muted compared to other diversified
manufacturers. The company benefits from significant exposure to
home remodeling and renovations rather than new construction. Its
products are also low cost and subject to less price sensitivity in
a downturn. This is underscored by healthy top-line growth in 2020
and only a moderate decline of about 5% in 2009.

Customer Concentration: The company has a concentrated retail
customer base, and there is risk that the loss of all or part of a
large customer could meaningfully reduce its scale with limited
opportunity to recoup lost volumes elsewhere. This risk is
mitigated by the company's track record of maintaining
long-standing relationships with core remodeling hardware
retailers. Home Depot, Lowes and Walmart represented 24%, 21% and
8% of HLMN's fiscal 2019 revenue, respectively. These customers
regularly undertake product line reviews of their vendors every few
years to determine whether and to what extent they will continue to
purchase products from a particular vendor.

Commodity-like Products: HLMN has a fairly commoditized product mix
across the majority of its business, particularly as it relates to
much of its fasteners, hardware, and personal protective products,
which account for more than three-fourths of revenue. Its key
cutting and kiosk offerings have a relatively higher technology
component, although there are competing offerings in the market. In
addition, HLMN sets itself apart with the service it provides
managing its categories for its key retailers

DERIVATION SUMMARY

HLMN's ratings consider its operating stability, adequate financial
flexibility and liquidity. These factors are weighed against high
leverage, a high degree of customer concentration and a fairly
commoditized product line. The ratings also consider the need to
refinance the $330 million of notes maturing in July 2022.

The Positive Rating Watch reflects the potentially significant
deleveraging with the planned sale of the company and an expected
intention to manage with lower leverage going forward. Fitch
compares HLMN to Park River Holdings (IDR B), a building products
distributor. The two companies have commodity-like products and
have a high degree of customer concentration, primarily to big box
retail stores. However, HLMN's leverage, after considering the
transaction, is expected to be significantly below Park River's,
which is expected to end 2021 around 6.3x and decline under 6.0x
during 2022.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- The transaction occurs as currently planned, without any
    redemptions, resulting in debt at closing of around $835
    million, and the existing debt structure is fully repaid;

-- Organic growth is particularly strong in 2020 due to high
    repair and remodeling tailwinds. Fitch assumes these tailwinds
    significantly slow driving low-single digit growth in the
    medium term;

-- EBITDA margins of 16% in 2020 which remain fairly steady
    thereafter;

-- Significantly lower interest costs support FCF margins in the
    mid-single digits;

-- The company prioritizes deleveraging while balancing an
    appetite for M&A.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to a
positive rating action/upgrade:

-- The expected ratings outlined above would be assigned assuming
    the transaction is completed consistent with Fitch's
    assumptions.

Should the transaction not be completed, the following factors
would support a positive rating action:

-- Commitment to a financial policy supporting maintenance of
    debt/EBITDA below 6.5x.

-- FCF margins sustained in the low-to-mid-single-digits.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to a
negative rating action/downgrade:

-- An inability to deleverage as near-term debt maturities drive
    higher refinancing risk.

-- FFO interest coverage consistently below 1.3x.

-- Sustained negative FCF generation that strains liquidity.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

As of Sept. 26, 2020, HLMN had total liquidity of $166 million,
composed of $32 million of cash and equivalents, and $134 million
of availability under its ABL facility, which expires in 2024.

The company's capital structure consisted of $97 million of ABL
facility borrowings, $1.0 billion of senior secured term loan
borrowings, $330 million of 6.375% senior unsecured notes due 2022,
and $105 million of 11.6% junior subordinated debentures. The term
loan amortizes at 1% per year and matures in 2025.

The junior subordinated debentures were created in 1997 during the
conversion from partnership to corporation and were lent by holding
entity Hillman Group Capital Trust. Fitch has assigned 50% equity
credit to the debentures.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Fitch has made no material adjustments that are not disclosed
within the company's public filings.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


HOFFMASTER GROUP: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa1 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Hoffmaster Group, Inc. (New) and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Hoffmaster Group, Inc.'s credit profile (Caa1 CFR) broadly reflects
its high financial leverage and weak interest coverage. The company
has customer concentration in the foodservice/restaurant and
specialty retail sectors that are experiencing unit closures and
reduced operations in response to the coronavirus outbreak. These
operating headwinds will continue to negatively impact sales and
earnings at least through the current outbreak. Hoffmaster has
relatively small scale with annual revenue well below $1.0 billion,
a narrow product focus and limited geographic diversification. The
credit profile also reflects the company's good market position in
the foodservice channel and in the more fragmented consumer
channel, specifically in the club and grocery sectors. Hoffmaster's
lack of channel conflict in the consumer channel and its strategic
position in foodservice provide a competitive advantage. Governance
factors include the company's aggressive financial policies under
private equity ownership. Hoffmaster's adequate liquidity reflects
our expectation for muted free cash flows over the next 12 months,
and relatively healthy cash balance and low capital expenditure
requirements.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


HORIZON THERAPEUTICS: Moody's Rates New Sr. Term Loan 'Ba1(LGD3)'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 (LGD3) rating to the new
senior secured term loan of Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc., a
subsidiary of Horizon Therapeutics plc (collectively "Horizon").
There are no changes to Horizon's existing ratings including the
Ba2 Corporate Family Rating, the Ba2-PD Probability of Default
Rating, the Ba1 senior secured rating, the Ba3 senior unsecured
rating and the SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating. The loss
given default assessment for the senior secured rating is modified
to LGD3 from LGD2. The outlook remains unchanged at stable.

Proceeds of the new term loan, together with cash on hand, are to
fund Horizon's previously announced acquisition of Viela Bio, Inc.
for approximately $3.05 billion.

Ratings assigned:

Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.

Senior secured bank credit facility, at Ba1 (LGD3)

LGD adjustments:

Senior secured bank credit facilities, LGD Adjusted to (LGD3) from
(LGD2)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Horizon's Ba2 Corporate Family Rating reflects its niche position
in the global pharmaceutical industry with annual revenue of
slightly more than $2 billion. Horizon's drugs for rare diseases
have high price points, good growth opportunities, and generally
high barriers to entry. Thyroid eye disease treatment Tepezza has
high sales potential based on significant unmet medical need and
its very successful initial launch. Horizon's efficient operating
structure and high profit margins will drive solid cash flow. Risk
factors include declining trends in the inflammation segment, R&D
execution risk, and unresolved legal exposures. Product
concentration is somewhat high, with the top three drugs generating
over half of sales for the foreseeable future.

Financial leverage incorporating the Viela acquisition is
moderately high, with pro forma debt/EBITDA of 4.4x as of September
30, 2020 using Moody's calculations. However, high earnings growth
will drive deleveraging, absent additional debt-financed
acquisitions. Pro forma cash on hand will decline to about $600
million, which together with solid cash flow provides some
flexibility for acquisitions.

Viela Bio's autoimmune drug, Uplizna, received FDA approved in June
2020 for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), a rare
disease that leads to vision and paralysis. Moody's anticipates
solid uptake in this indication. However, the success of the
acquisition will depend on the outcomes of various other clinical
studies, including the use of Uplizna and various pipeline
compounds in a wide range of autoimmune and severe inflammatory
diseases.

ESG considerations are material to the rating. Horizon faces
exposure to regulatory and legislative efforts aimed at reducing
drug prices. These are fueled in part by demographic and societal
trends that are pressuring government budgets because of rising
healthcare spending. Due to a niche focus in rare diseases,
Horizon's products tend to carry very high gross prices. That being
said, orphan drugs are somewhat less likely to be affected by drug
pricing reform than traditional and specialty oral products that
have very high spending within the Medicare Part D population.
Among governance considerations, Horizon underwent substantial
deleveraging transactions in 2019, repaying a material amount of
debt with public equity offering proceeds and balance sheet cash,
in order to align its financial leverage with companies in its
defined biopharmaceutical peer group. Moody's viewed this
favorably, but notes that the company's M&A strategy will still
result in moderate financial leverage over time.

The Ba3 rating on Horizon's senior unsecured notes, which remains
unchanged, reflects a one-notch positive over-ride from Moody's
Loss Given Default model. The addition of senior secured debt in
the form of the new $1.3 billion term loan increases the level of
subordination to unsecured creditors. However, the Ba3 rating on
the unsecured notes incorporates Moody's expectation that the mix
of secured and unsecured debt in Horizon's capital structure will
continue to fluctuate over time and that the level of subordination
will remain moderate.

Horizon's liquidity will remain strong, reflected in the SGL-1
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating. This is due to high cash on
hand, positive free cash flow, no financial maintenance covenants
in the term loan and minimal debt amortization requirements.

The rating outlook is stable, reflecting Moody's expectation for
strong earnings growth combined with adherence to the company's
stated debt/EBITDA targets. These include gross debt/EBITDA of
roughly 2.0x (on the company's basis), or 3.0x for an opportunistic
acquisition, to be followed by deleveraging. On Horizon's basis,
gross debt/EBITDA will rise to 2.8x after the acquisition of
Viela.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Factors that could lead to an upgrade include: significant
expansion in scale, improving product diversity, and resolution of
the outstanding Department of Justice subpoena into marketing and
commercialization practices. Specifically, debt/EBITDA sustained
below 3.0x using Moody's definitions could support an upgrade.

Factors that could lead to a downgrade include erosion in cash flow
that may arise from declining volumes, significant pricing
pressure, or generic competition for key products. Debt-financed
acquisitions, or an escalation of legal risks could also pressure
the ratings. Specifically, debt/EBITDA sustained above 4.0x using
Moody's definitions could lead to a downgrade.

Headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois, Horizon Therapeutics USA,
Inc., is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Dublin,
Ireland-based Horizon Therapeutics plc (collectively "Horizon").
Horizon is a publicly-traded pharmaceutical company focused on
developing and commercializing innovative medicines that address
unmet treatment needs for rare and rheumatic diseases. Annual net
sales in 2020 were approximately $2.1 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Pharmaceutical
Industry published in June 2017.


HORIZON THERAPEUTICS: S&P Assigns Prelim BB+ Rating on Sec. Loan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Horizon Therapeutics USA Inc. is proposing a $1.3 billion senior
secured term loan to fund, together with cash on hand, the $2.7
billion acquisition of Viela Bio Inc. S&P assigned a preliminary
'BB+' issue-level rating to the loan with a '2' recovery rating,
indicating our expectation for substantial (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 70%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

S&P will finalize the rating at the close of the acquisition.

S&P said, "The proposed incremental secured term loan significantly
increases the proportion of secured debt, eroding recovery
prospects on the secured and unsecured debt, in our view. Our
issue-level ratings on the outstanding debt is on CreditWatch with
negative implications, as we expect to lower our ratings on the
secured tranche to 'BB+' with a '2' recovery rating and the
unsecured tranche to 'B+' with a '6' recovery rating.

"Our 'BB' long-term issuer credit rating and stable outlook are
unchanged. The 'BB' rating reflects Horizon's long life cycle for
its largest products, especially Tepezza, and improving product
depth and research and development capabilities. The rating also
reflects our expectations for adjusted debt to EBITDA to generally
remain in the 2x-3x range."

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

-- Horizon's pro forma capital structure consists of a $275
million secured revolving credit facility (assumed 85% drawn at
hypothetical default), $1.718 billion of senior secured term loans,
and $600 million of senior unsecured notes.

-- The senior secured term loan is issued by Horizon Therapeutics
USA Inc.

-- The unsecured notes are issued by Horizon Therapeutics USA Inc.
and guaranteed by Horizon Therapeutics PLC and its other operating
subsidiaries.

-- S&P estimates the company's EBITDA at emergence from a
hypothetical default would likely be significantly lower than its
expected 2020 EBITDA. S&P believes significant pricing pressure or
competition for several of Horizon's lead products would most
likely lead to a default.

-- Given Horizon's patented branded products, S&P has applied a 7x
EBITDA multiple, in line with the multiples it uses for similar
pharmaceutical companies, to arrive at an estimated enterprise
value at emergence from default.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Contemplated year of default: 2026
-- Expected jurisdiction of default: U.S.
-- EBITDA at emergence: $217 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 7x
-- Unadjusted gross enterprise value: $1.521 billion

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $1.445
billion

-- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 100%/0%

-- Collateral value available to secured creditors: $1.445
billion

-- Senior secured debt claim: $1.933 billion

    --Recovery expectations: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 70%)

-- Value available to unsecured creditors: $0

-- Unsecured debt claim: $617 million

-- Pari passu deficiency claims: $488 million

    --Recovery expectations: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 0%)


IBIO INC: Names Robert Lutz as Chief Financial and Business Officer
-------------------------------------------------------------------
iBio, Inc. has appointed Robert M. Lutz as its chief financial and
business officer, effective March 4, 2021.

"I am pleased to welcome Rob to iBio where we expect he will make
an immediate impact on our business during this transformative
time," said Tom Isett, chairman & CEO of iBio.  "His deep
experience across corporate finance and business development
functions, breadth of public company experience, and demonstrated
expertise in building product portfolios is a tremendous fit for
iBio as we seek to execute on our new business model."

Mr. Lutz brings more than 25 years of experience to the Company,
joining most recently from Strongbridge Biopharma plc, a
Nasdaq-listed, commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company focused
on rare diseases.  He served as CFO since August 2019, and prior to
that, as chief business officer since October 2014.  During his
tenure, he led the search, evaluation, contracting, and financing
of multiple assets which proved to be critical growth drivers for
Strongbridge.

Before joining Strongbridge, Mr. Lutz spent more than a decade at
Shire Pharmaceuticals in leadership positions with global
responsibilities, including identifying opportunities for
acquisition, licensing, partnership and development for Shire's
largest business unit (Neuroscience) and the financial management
of approximately $5 billion in revenue for its Specialty
Pharmaceuticals division.  Prior to joining Shire, Mr. Lutz served
in a variety of financial, strategic and executive positions after
having started his career at Goldman Sachs & Company.  He holds an
MBA from the Kellogg School of Management and a BA in Economics and
Computer Science from Amherst College.

"It is an exciting time to be joining iBio," Mr. Lutz commented.
"There is a unique opportunity to leverage the strengths of the
Company's high-speed, plant-based biopharmaceutical production
capabilities across multiple product categories and therapeutic
areas.  I look forward to working with the team to expand the
product pipeline, accelerate growth, and enhance value for our
shareholders."

As CFBO, Mr. Lutz will lead iBio's finance organization and be
responsible for building strong licensing capabilities and the
financial planning & analysis function, as well as supporting
iBio's relationships with the investment community.

Mr. Lutz is entitled to an annual base salary of $425,000, which
will accrue starting on the Effective Date.  Mr. Lutz is eligible
for a target bonus of 40% of the base salary paid to him during the
prior fiscal year based upon the Compensation Committee's
assessment of his performance and the performance of the Company
during the prior fiscal year.

                          About iBio Inc.

iBio, Inc. -- http://www.ibioinc.com-- is a full-service
plant-based expression biologics CDMO equipped to deliver
pre-clinical development through regulatory approval, commercial
product launch and on-going commercial phase requirements.  iBio's
FastPharming expression system, iBio's proprietary approach to
plant-made pharmaceutical (PMP) production, can produce a range of
recombinant products including monoclonal antibodies, antigens
forsubunit vaccine design, lysosomal enzymes, virus-like particles
(VLP), blood factors and cytokines, scaffolds, maturogens and
materials for 3D bio-printing and bio-fabrication,
biopharmaceutical intermediates and others, as well as create and
produce proprietary derivatives of pre-existing products with
improved properties.

iBio disclosed a net loss attributable to the Company of $16.44
million for the year ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss
attributable to the Company of $17.59 million for the year ended
June 30, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $145.41
million in total assets, $38.08 million in total liabilities, and
$107.32 million in total equity.


IN-SHAPE HOLDINGS: Court Approves Bankruptcy Sale to Lenders
------------------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf of Bloomberg Law reports that In-Shape Holdings LLC will
sell its chain of California fitness centers to former CEO Paul
Rothbard, Aquiline Capital Partners LLC, and other investors after
getting court approval for the deal.

The transaction, approved Feb. 19, 2021, eliminates $45.3 million
of debt owed to the purchasers and keeps In-Shape's gyms in
business for the foreseeable future.

The company sought approval from Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware after no
other interested parties came forward to top Rothbard and
Aquiline's offer. The sale leaves unsecured creditors without a
cash recovery, but will preserve jobs.

                    About In-Shape Health

In-Shape is a regional health club operator.  Before the outbreak
of COVID-19, In-Shape operated 65 clubs with over 470,000 members.
Its clubs offer premium amenities and member-focused community club
experiences at tiered pricing levels in secondary markets around
California.  Visit https://www.inshape.com/ for more information.

In 2012, Fremont Group purchased 78% of the Company from the
Rothbards and their co-investors.  

Fremont Group remains the majority equity owner of ISHC.

In-Shape Holdings, LLC, and two affiliates, including In-Shape
Health Clubs, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Case No. 20-13130) on Dec. 16, 2020.

In-Shape Holdings was estimated to have $50 million to $100 million
in assets and $100 million to $500 million in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped KELLER BENVENUTTI KIM LLP as bankruptcy counsel;
TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP as local bankruptcy
co-counsel; and CHILMARK PARTNERS, LLC as investment banker.  B.
RILEY FINANCIAL, INC., is the real estate advisor.  Stretto is the
claims agent.


INFINITE BIDCO: Moody's Assigns First Time B3 Corp. Family Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a first-time B3 Corporate Family
Rating and a B3-PD Probability of Default Rating to Infinite Bidco
LLC (dba Infinite Electronics; "Infinite"). Moody's also assigned a
B2 rating to the proposed $740 million first lien credit facilities
($100 million revolver and $640 million term loan) and a Caa2
rating to the proposed $240 million second lien term loan. The
outlook is stable.

Net proceeds from the proposed credit facilities, rollover equity,
and new sponsor equity will be used to fund the acquisition of
Infinite Electronics by Warburg Pincus LLC. In addition, Infinite
will be provided with a privately-placed $55 million delayed draw,
first lien term loan and a privately-placed $20 million delayed
draw, second lien term loan. The assigned ratings are subject to
review of final documentation and no material change in the terms
and conditions of the transaction as advised to Moody's. The rating
actions are summarized as follows:

Assignments:

Issuer: Infinite Bidco LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned B2
(LGD3)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Delayed Draw 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned B2
(LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term Loan, Assigned Caa2 (LGD5)

Senior Secured Delayed Draw 2nd Lien Term Loan, Assigned Caa2
(LGD5)

Issuer: Infinite Bidco LLC

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Infinite's B3 CFR reflects very high debt to EBITDA of 8.2x
(including Moody's standard adjustments) at closing and a track
record for maintaining adjusted leverage above 7x reflecting
historical debt funded acquisitions or growth investments. High
leverage leaves Infinite with limited financial flexibility in the
event heightened competition or other factors lead to unexpected
revenue declines or pressure on profit margins. Ratings are
supported, however, by Infinite's solid position as a global
supplier of electronic components and assemblies to the
"availability" subsegment of the production market. This
availability subsegment meets the urgent, unplanned, and low volume
demands which are non-discretionary and mission critical to
customers, primarily engineers. The essential nature supports
Infinite's pricing power, which paired with the absence of
manufacturing operations, sustains EBITDA margins (including
Moody's standard adjustments) above 30%, compared to 2% to 9%
adjusted EBITDA margins for typical technology distributors.
Despite macroeconomic headwinds caused by ongoing trade disputes
and COVID-19 since the beginning of 2020, Infinite achieved 4%-5%
topline gains in each of 2019 and 2020.

Moody's expects Infinite will grow revenues in the mid-single digit
percentage range with stable to improving gross margins supported
by customary price increases. As a result, Infinite should be able
to maintain adjusted free cash flow to debt in the mid singled
digit percentage range with debt to EBITDA (including Moody's
standard adjustments) improving below the mid 7x range within one
year. Ratings are also supported by secular trends in the
availability segment including the ongoing 5G rollout, increased
demand for IoT-connected devices, and growth in automation, all of
which will drive R&D spend by Infinite's engineer-base of
customers.

Governance risk and financial policies are key considerations given
that financial sponsors typically look to enhance equity returns
through debt funded acquisitions or distributions. Moody's views
Infinite's financial policies to be somewhat aggressive given
private-equity ownership, the potential for debt funded
transactions, and proposed adjusted leverage in the low 8x range at
closing. Lack of public financial disclosure and the absence of
board independence are also incorporated in the B3 CFR.

The coronavirus outbreak, the government measures put in place to
contain it, and the weak global economic outlook continue to
disrupt economies and credit markets across sectors and regions.
Although an economic recovery is underway, it is tenuous, and its
continuation will be closely tied to containment of the virus.
Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its
ESG framework, given the substantial implications for public health
and safety.

Liquidity is good reflecting Moody's expectation for the proposed
$100 million revolver being largely undrawn and annual adjusted
free cash flow to debt in the mid-single digit percentage range
over the next year. Liquidity is supported by Infinite's asset-lite
business model with minimal seasonality.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation for mid-single
digit percentage topline gains over the next year, stable adjusted
EBITDA margins, and improving free cash flow generation. Moody's
expects adjusted leverage and free cash flow will improve as excess
cash is applied to reduce debt balances. The outlook also
incorporates organic growth investments and future tuck-in
acquisitions being funded primarily with excess cash. To the extent
a portion or all of the delayed draw term loans are funded (up to
$75 million available) or other additional debt is issued, Moody's
expects adjusted debt to EBITDA will remain below 8x upon funding
and key credit metrics, including adjusted debt to EBITDA and free
cash flow to debt, will return to levels prior to the new funding
within two fiscal quarters.

Ratings could be upgraded if revenues grow consistently with stable
adjusted EBITDA margins and debt to EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) being
sustained below 6x. Good liquidity would need to be maintained
including adjusted free cash flow to debt above the mid-single
digit percentage range. Infinite's ratings could be downgraded if
adjusted debt to EBITDA is expected to be sustained above 7.5x or
if adjusted free cash flow to debt were to fall below 2%. There
could be downward pressure on ratings if organic revenue growth
decelerates to the low-single digit percentage range or if adjusted
EBITDA margins were to fall below 27% reflecting market pressure,
poor execution, or other challenges. Deterioration in liquidity
could also cause downward rating pressure.

As proposed, the new first lien term loan is expected to provide
covenant flexibility for transactions that could adversely affect
creditors including a privately placed $55 million first lien
delayed draw facility; a privately placed $20 million delayed draw
second lien term loan; as well as incremental facility capacity
equal to (i) the greater of $120 million and (ii) 100% of
Consolidated EBITDA, plus additional pari passu credit facilities
so long as the first lien net leverage ratio does not exceed 5.25x.
Additional debt is permitted for incremental facilities that are
secured on a junior lien basis (subject to a 7.25x senior secured
leverage ratio limit and 1.75x interest coverage) or are unsecured
(subject to a 7.5x total leverage ratio limit and 1.75x interest
coverage). Proposed terms related to the release of subsidiary
guarantees and collateral leakage through transfers to unrestricted
subsidiaries have not been disclosed. Summary term sheet indicates
a 100% net asset sale prepayment requirement stepping down to 50%
when the first lien net leverage ratio is 4.75x, and then 0% when
ratio is 4.25x, subject to a 540-day reinvestment window.

Infinite Electronics, Inc., with headquarters in Irvine, CA, is a
global supplier of electronic components and assemblies for the
urgent, unplanned, and last-minute demand of engineers during their
R&D, repair, and design activities. Infinite will be majority owned
by funds associated with Warburg Pincus upon closing of the
transaction.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.


INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE: Adequate Protection Payments to Begin Feb. 23
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Scott M. Grossman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida gave Innovative Software Solution,
Inc. until February 17, 2021 to use cash collateral.

A final hearing on the Debtor's use of cash collateral was
scheduled to take place on February 17 at 2 p.m.

The Debtor was authorized to use cash collateral with a provision
for adequate protection payments to On Deck Capital in the amount
of $100 monthly, and no provision for adequate protection payments
to the United States Small Business Administration.  Adequate
protection payments are set to begin 7 days after the entry of the
Court's February 16, 2021 Order, or on February 23.

The approved budget provided for total expenses of $14,369.34 for
the month of January and $20,419.34 for the month of February.

On February 16, 2021, the Debtor filed its amended motion which
sought the use of the cash collateral of On Deck Capital.  On Deck
Capital is the first in priority recorded UCC-1.  The Debtor owes
On Deck $70,000.  The Debtor said that On Deck is a fully secured
creditor and that while the Debtor is not required to pay adequate
protection payments to On Deck, the Debtor proposed to continue to
pay On Deck monthly adequate protection payments in the amount of
$100.

The Debtor related that "the United States Small Business
Administration also has a recorded UCC.  SBA alleges a claim in the
amount of $150,000.  The value of the collateral securing the SBA's
claim is approximately $83,021.26.  As a result, the SBA has a
partially secured claim."  The Debtor proposed to pay the SBA
monthly adequate protection payments in the amount of $200.

The Debtor further related that the current value of all its
assets, in the opinion of Natalie Frazier, its Co-President is
$153,021.26.

The Debtor said it needed access to all of the cash collateral,
until a final order is entered, to continue its business
operations.

                    About Innovative Software Solution

Innovative Software Solution, Inc. filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 21-10538) on Jan. 20, 2021. Natalie Frazier, its
president, signed the petition. Debtor estimated assets at $0 to
$50,000 and liabilities at $100,001 to $500,000. Judge Scott M.
Grossman oversees the case. Van Horn Law Group, PA serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.



IOWA FERTILIZER: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Rating on Senior Secured Bonds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 17, 2021, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' rating on
Iowa Fertilizer Co. LLC's (IFCo) senior secured tax-exempt bonds.
The '1' recovery rating is unchanged, indicating a very high
recovery expectation (90%-100%) under a hypothetical payment
default scenario.

S&P said, "The outlook is stable, reflecting our expectation that
IFCo's robust operational performance will continue and fertilizer
prices will improve. We forecast IFCo's DSCR will be above 2x in
2021 and expect a minimum DSCR of 1.45x in 2025."

The Wever nitrogen fertilizer facility began commercial operations
in mid-2017. The plant has ammonia production capacity of 2,425
short tons per day (STPD), but is capable of achieving up to 2,820
STPD because the equipment installed has a higher design margin.
The upstream part of the plant produces ammonia and urea solution
(urea in liquid form produced from ammonia and carbon dioxide), and
the downstream part converts either ammonia or urea solution into
other products like granular urea, urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), or
diesel exhaust fluid (DEF).

IFCo is strategically located in southeastern Iowa, near the
Iowa-Illinois border and in the center of the Midwest Corn Belt.
The Midwest Corn Belt is the largest market in the U.S. for direct
application of nitrogen fertilizer products. Iowa and Illinois rank
highest in the consumption of nitrogen products for corn
production.

The company's nitrogen fertilizer products are usually sold within
a 250-mile radius. It is generally more expensive for customers to
buy fertilizers from New Orleans (the entry point of imported
fertilizers) and have the products delivered to the Midwest.

Nitrogen fertilizer prices are sensitive to changes in fundamental
supply and demand factors, such as weather patterns, field
conditions, crop prices, population changes, and trade policies
related to agricultural products. S&P expects the U.S. will remain
a net importer of nitrogen fertilizers and there are currently no
new large-scale domestic plants under construction.

Natural gas is the major feedstock for U.S. ammonia production, and
typically represents a large portion of a producer's total cost.
S&P believes this risk is reduced because IFCo procures natural gas
from ANR SW Oklahoma, which has consistently been trading below
Henry Hub.

Fertilizer prices are expected to recover from below mid-cycle
prices of 2020.  Globally, fertilizer prices were depressed during
2020. This was largely due to oversupply, spurred by low prices for
feedstock such as natural gas, as opposed to significantly weaker
demand. Therefore, less-efficient producers were able to get
adequate margins for their output due to lower variable costs.

S&P anticipates prices will continue the recovery that started in
late 2020, mostly due to improved demand. Crop prices are much
higher, largely fueled by strong demand globally, including corn
demand from China as feedstock. Improved crop prices are positive
for nitrogen product demand, as they incentivize farmers to apply
more fertilizer to increase yields.

The U.S. pricing discount to global benchmarks is expected to
narrow.  The depressed pricing was further exacerbated in the U.S.
market, with local fertilizer prices trading at a discount to
global benchmarks. This can be attributed to import dynamics and
the resultant overproduction from domestic players. Due to higher
tariffs in Europe, Russian and Trinidadian UAN supply was
redirected to the U.S. In response, local suppliers lowered their
prices to protect their market share. Overall, as IFCo sells its
product on a merchant basis, its cash flow generation and DSCRs in
2020 were below our expectations, reaching a low of 1.3x in the
second quarter.

S&P expects that fertilizer pricing in the U.S. should also recover
and that the gap between U.S. and global prices will continue to
narrow. On the supply side, some Russian supply is now being
redirected to the European market despite tariffs, due to depressed
U.S. UAN prices. On the demand side, U.S. farmers are benefiting
from generous government subsidies, put in place to offset damaging
tariffs implemented before the COVID-19 pandemic. Combined with
improved crop prices, this will likely result in higher spending on
supply.

Continued growth in the DEF business should provide more cash flow
diversity. IFCo continues to build on its DEF growth strategy. This
product is used to reduce the air pollution caused by diesel engine
and allows automotive manufacturers to meet carbon emissions
requirements. IFCo has established an advantageous position, with
about 20%-25% market share in the U.S. DEF volume sales for 2020
increased to about 711,000 short tons, an increase of about 30,000
short tons compared with 2019. Despite DEF still representing a
fairly modest proportion of the company's cash flows, S&P views
this diversification as credit positive because DEF is not cyclical
or seasonal and has attractive margins.

More recently, demand for DEF has increased significantly with the
rebound in road traffic. S&P believes that demand should also
benefit from a more permanent recovery in mileage driven.

Redemption of the series 2016 notes modestly improves the company's
DSCR ratios. S&P said, "In our opinion, the redemption of about
$147 million of 5.875% series 2016 notes due 2026 and 2027 is
credit positive because it will result in lower cash debt service
of about $9 million annually. However, given the amortizing feature
of the bonds, the higher principal payments required between 2023
and 2025 associated with the series 2013 notes still support our
minimum DSCR of 1.45x in 2025. Although we are not modeling a
refinancing of the series 2013 in our base-case scenario, DSCRs
could improve if IFCo were to launch an opportunistic debt
exchange."

S&P said, "Under our base-case scenario, DSCRs for 2021 are
projected to be above 2x, with average DSCR of about 5.60x during
the life of the project. Overall, the minimum DSCR remains
commensurate with a 'BB-' rating for a project-financed asset and
provides sufficient cushion to support the rating.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that IFCo will maintain good
operational performance and that U.S. fertilizer prices will
recover in 2021, as demand is forecast to outpace supply. We
forecast IFCo's DSCR will be above 2x in 2021 and expect a minimum
DSCR of 1.45x in 2025 when we expect senior debt service to be
higher.

"We could lower the rating if IFCo's operating performance
deteriorates such that DSCRs fall below 1.3x on a sustained basis.
This could stem from unforeseen operational issues that require a
full plant shutdown for an extended period or adverse market
conditions, such as weakened nitrogen fertilizer pricing in the
U.S. Midwest.

"We could raise the rating if we believed that, given the volatile
nature of nitrogen fertilizer prices, IFCo could consistently
achieve debt service coverage exceeding 2x in all years of our
base-case projection. This could stem from systemic changes in
nitrogen fertilizer production economics that lead to sustained
improvement of U.S. nitrogen fertilizer prices but without an
increase in natural gas feedstock costs."


IOWA FINANCE: Fitch Hikes Rating on Disaster Area Bonds to 'B+'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded the Iowa Finance Authority's outstanding
Midwestern Disaster Area revenue bonds (series 2013, 2018A, 2018B
and 2019) to 'B+' from 'B'. The Rating Outlook is Stable. The Iowa
Finance Authority has issued a total of $1.185 billion of revenue
bonds on behalf of Iowa Fertilizer Company LLC (IFCo).

RATING RATIONALE

The upgrade reflects demonstrated improvement in the project's
financial profile, largely due to early repayment of $147.2 million
series 2016 revenue bonds, with limited remaining margin of safety
for repayment of the bonds under Fitch's rating case scenario. The
project has maintained its strong production rate and is
operationally positioned to achieve stable margins, assuming it can
sustain its operating profile and control costs while product
pricing levels remain stable.

The facility remains vulnerable to extended operational shortfalls
and a historically volatile and potentially weak product pricing
environment. Favorably, access to abundant and advantageously
priced natural gas feedstock partially mitigates margin risk. The
project has sufficient liquidity available in the form of various
reserve funds and a working capital facility to mitigate short-term
liquidity issues.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Nitrogen Market Price Exposure - Revenue Risk: Weaker
IFCo sells its nitrogen products to farmers, distributors,
wholesalers, cooperatives, truck stop operators and blenders at
market prices. The project's main products have historically
exhibited considerable price volatility. The project enjoys some
geographical product pricing advantages but remains exposed to
long-term market supply and demand risks.

Advantageous Access to Natural Gas - Supply Risk: Midrange
Fitch expects the U.S. gas market to provide the project with an
ample supply of natural gas. The project procures its natural gas
feedstock via an existing pipeline at prices linked to the ANR SW
Oklahoma index, which has historically been at discount to Henry
Hub prices and is an important advantage compared with some
domestic and foreign competitors. IFCo has entered into natural gas
call swaptions through 2023 to moderate the risk of a reversal in
gas pricing trends. In addition, the project will fund a hedging
reserve account or enter into further call swaptions to help
mitigate price risk during the non-hedged period through 2025,
which would also dispense with the requirement to fund a reserve.

Improving Operating Profile - Operation Risk: Midrange
The project has demonstrated a strong and improving production rate
and lower outages. Non-feedstock O&M and maintenance cost
projections have not been tested over an extended period of time,
and the project may require several years of operations to
establish a stable cost profile. The use of commercially proven
technologies and a plant design with oversized capacity should help
mitigate operating performance risk.

Standard Debt Structure - Debt Structure: Midrange
Fixed-rate, fully amortizing debt structure with some refinance
risk is consistent with other project financings. Relatively high
equity distribution triggers and a debt service reserve equivalent
to six months of maximum senior bond payments support debt
repayment during periods of low operating cash flow. Operating and
major maintenance reserves help shield the project from cash flow
shortfalls and can be tapped to meet debt service, if needed.

Financial Summary
The project's ability to meet ongoing mandatory debt payments is
vulnerable to product pricing remaining at currently depressed
levels on a sustained basis. Fitch's rating case debt service
coverage ratios (DSCRs) are averaging 2.01x with a minimum of 1.38x
through debt maturity using prices that are higher than 2020 actual
market prices. The project's coverage profile demonstrates
significant volatility partially driven by its turnaround schedule,
but the project should have enough liquidity to mitigate any
short-term cash flow deficiencies and can adjust its turnaround
schedule to manage its financial profile. Relatively high equity
distribution triggers help the project retain cash balances during
low cash flow periods.

PEER GROUP

IFCo's peer group includes merchant project financings in which
product sales are susceptible to the inherent volatility of
commodity markets. Merchant projects in the 'B' rating category or
lower typically are exposed to price and volume risk, and operate
in a business environment with highly volatile margins. Merchant
projects that have achieved ratings in the 'BB' category have
demonstrated some combination of long-term margin protection,
materially lower leverage, structural enhancements, or a proven,
quasi-monopolistic competitive advantage.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Production and margin levels that lead to a revised rating
    case DSCR profile at or above 1.7x;

-- Successful refinancing of 2023-2025 bond maturities leading to
    a stronger financial profile;

-- Continued deleveraging that leads to a materially improved
    financial profile.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Operational performance below expectations or weakening in
    near-term product prices;

-- A fundamental shift in the supply-demand balance or global
    producer cost curve that results in materially lower operating
    margins expected to persist over a long period;

-- Failure to refinance 2023-2025 bond maturities leading to a
    heightened risk of payment default;

-- Inability to effectively manage operating costs or failure to
    reach and sustain projected capacity and utilization rates.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Sovereigns, Public Finance
and Infrastructure issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario
(defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in
a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating
horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative
direction) of three notches over three years. The complete span of
best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating
categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario
credit ratings are based on historical performance.

CREDIT UPDATE

In 2020 the project's Fitch calculated actual DSCR was 1.58x,
higher than Fitch's base and rating case expectation of 1.15x. The
EBITDA was lower than the budget due to a weak pricing environment
that followed a decrease in commodity prices. However, the
project's fixed production costs and most other costs have been
lower than budget, making up for some of the lost revenues.

In February of 2021 the project redeemed $147.2 million of
outstanding bonds using liquidity from its parent, OCI NV, in the
form of equity. This transaction reduces the project's debt burden
and interest costs by $9 million annually, leading to an
improvement in its financial profile.

In 2020 the project maintained its strong production rate, well
above nameplate capacity. Its actual production for upstream
products exceeded Fitch's base case expectations, and the project
experienced only modest outages all of which have been
satisfactorily resolved.

The Covid-19 pandemic did not have a major impact on operations.
However, the pandemic and low commodity prices led to a significant
decline in nitrogen fertilizer prices. The realized 2020 prices
were lower than 2019 prices and 2018 prices. The prices started to
recover at the end of 2020, with early 2021 prices higher by 30-55%
depending on the product.

IFCo's operating margins remain dependent on favorable market
pricing for nitrogen products. The pricing of nitrogen products is
somewhat correlated to the price of feedstock, which may be oil,
coal or natural gas depending on the region and producer. In recent
years, the substantial declines in oil and natural gas prices have
driven nitrogen prices to levels approaching 10-year lows. Although
the prices have seen significant recovery compared to their lows in
2017, they continue to be highly volatile. It remains to be seen if
positive pricing trends materialize, which will drive the project's
future credit profile now that it has reached full operational
phase.

Favorably, U.S. natural gas prices trade at a significant discount
to global energy prices and are close to 50% of what was projected
in 2013, providing the project with a competitive advantage. U.S.
gas prices are expected to remain low into the foreseeable future.
The project has access to abundant natural gas feedstock at prices
currently below Henry Hub. It has put in place forward purchases to
crystalize some of this upside.

Interior U.S. premiums such as in the Cornbelt states have largely
remained intact as there remains insufficient regional supply to
meet demand, benefitting the project. The project team believes
that a lack of new U.S. capacity, continued regional demand in the
Midwest and substantial transportation advantage will continue to
support ammonia price premiums enjoyed by the Cornbelt producers.

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Fitch's rating case has been revised to reflect updated product
prices in 2021 based on management projections, feedstock prices
and assumptions regarding planned future refundings.

Relative to Fitch's base case, for the rating case Fitch
additionally assumes 10% non-feedstock cost stress, 7.5% production
level stress and average 2018 product prices with 2% annual
escalation after 2021. Based on discussions with the project
management team, Fitch incorporated assumptions regarding several
refundings to achieve lower interest payments and to improve the
debt amortization profile, most significant of which is a partial
refunding of 2023 to 2025 maturities.

The rating case scenario puts increased pressure on the financial
profile and suggests that IFCo may face substantial volatility in
its coverage profile, partially due to its turnaround schedules.
The rating case DSCRs average 2x with 1.38x minimum. Fitch
anticipates that the project will have sufficient liquidity to
mitigate any short-term cash flow deficiency and can adjust its
turnaround schedule to manage its financial profile.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


IQVIA INC: S&P Rates New Euro-Denominated Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB'
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' rating and '5' recovery rating
to IQVIA Inc.'s proposed senior unsecured notes due 2026 and 2029.
The '5' recovery rating indicates its expectation for modest
(10%-30%; rounded estimate: 10%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.

S&P said, "We expect the company to use the proceeds from these
notes to redeem its 3.25% senior unsecured notes due 2025 and to
pay fees and expenses related to this offering, since the
transaction is leverage neutral.

"Our 'BB+' long-term issuer credit rating and stable outlook on the
company's parent, IQVIA Holdings Inc., remain unchanged."

The business benefits from sizable scale (2020 revenue of $11.4
billion), strong market positions in both its Technology &
Analytics Solutions and Research & Development Solutions segments,
and recurring revenue in its information business.

The company also benefits from favorable industry dynamics of
increasing outsourcing penetration and a healthy environment for
pharmaceutical research and development.

However, leverage remains elevated for the rating. S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA was approximately 5x as of Dec. 31,
2020. S&P said, "We expect revenue and EBITDA to increase at a
brisk rate in 2021, recovering from 2020 lows, and for the company
to generate solid free cash flow of about $1 billion. In addition,
the company has stated its intention to reduce leverage over the
next two years, and we expect debt to EBITDA to decline to about
4.4x-4.7x in 2021."


ISAGENIX INTERNATIONAL: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa2 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Isagenix International, LLC and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Isagenix's CFR Caa2 reflects Moody's concern that competitive,
economic, and structural headwinds, and senior management turnover
will continue to create challenges for the company to stem revenue
declines and quickly execute a turnaround strategy. Moody's view
liquidity as weak. Moody's also believe that certain social
elements, including changes to consumer shopping patterns and the
attractiveness of individuals serving as sales representatives at
Isagenix, may negatively impact the company's "multi-level
marketing" business model. The company's multi-level marketing
structure also increases the risk of adverse regulatory and/or
legal actions, and the potential for actions by regulatory
authorities can't be ruled out. The company will face difficulty
mitigating revenue and earnings declines. This will impact
Isagenix's credit metrics, constrain its ability to repay debt, and
pressure the company's liquidity. Isagenix's credit profile is
supported by the company's broad product suite, and a variable cost
structure given the outsourced manufacturing model, as well as
sales commissions and marketing expenses that fluctuate with sales
volume. Moody's expect the company's variable cost structure will
lead to modestly positive free cash flow in 2020 despite continued
revenue declines. Social factors driven by an aging population and
obesity trends that support demand for health, wellness and weight
loss products also benefit the credit profile.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


JP INTERMEDIATE: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa3 CFR
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of JP Intermediate B, LLC and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

JP Intermediate B, LLC's (indirect parent company of The Juice Plus
Company LLC) Caa3 Corporate Family Rating reflects the company's
high financial leverage, elevated risk of a distressed exchange or
other restructuring, weak liquidity, aggressive financial policies,
inherent risks of a direct selling business model, narrow product
line of nutritional supplements, and high turnover of new members.
The rating is supported by a variable cost structure and social
factors driven by an aging population and obesity trends which
support demand for health, wellness, and weight loss products.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


KNOTEL INC: Digiatech Can File Reply to Bid Procedures for Assets
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mary F. Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware granted Digiatech, LLC, leave to file amended and
restated statement in support of Knotel, Inc. and its affiliates'
proposed bidding procedures in connection with the sale of
substantially all assets to Digiatech, LLC or its designee for $70
million, subject to overbid.

Digiatech is permitted to file the Reply attached to the Motion for
Leave as Exhibit B.

A copy of the Bid Procedures and APA is available at
https://tinyurl.com/26m35wjz from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                         About Knotel Inc.

Knotel -- http://www.Knotel.com/-- is a flexible workspace
platform that matches, tailors, and manages space for customers.
New York-based Knotel offers workspace properties such as desks,
open, and private spaces on rent for companies in 20 global
markets.  In the U.S., Knotel primarily serves in the New York
City
and San Francisco areas.

Knotel, founded in 2015, raised hundreds of millions of dollars
from investors. It expanded rapidly for years and was one of the
more aggressive competitors in the co-working and flexible office
space sector, becoming one of WeWork's fiercest rival.

As the COVID-19 pandemic upended the co-working industry, Knotel,
Inc., and its U.S. subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 21-10146) on Jan. 30, 2021, to pursue a
sale of the assets to Newmark Group.

Knotel estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP is serving as the Company's
counsel.  Moelis & Company is the investment banker.  Omni Agent
Solutions is the claims agent.



KNOTEL INC: Extends Sale Timeline to Pacify Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that workspace provider Knotel Inc. told a Delaware
bankruptcy judge Thursday, Feb. 19, 2021, that it had reached a
deal with unsecured creditors to add two weeks to its Chapter 11
sale timeline after those creditors argued that the plan was moving
too quickly.

During a virtual hearing, debtor attorney Mark Shinderman of
Milbank LLP said Knotel understood the concerns raised by the
official committee of unsecured creditors about the originally
proposed sale timeline and engaged in fruitful negotiations to
resolve the opposition. "We understood the request for more time,"
Shinderman told the court.

                        About Knotel Inc.

Knotel -- http://www.Knotel.com/-- is a flexible workspace
platform that matches, tailors, and manages space for customers.
New York-based Knotel offers workspace properties such as desks,
open, and private spaces on rent for companies in 20 global
markets.  In the U.S., Knotel primarily serves in the New York City
and San Francisco areas.

Knotel, founded in 2015, raised hundreds of millions of dollars
from investors.  It expanded rapidly for years and was one of the
more aggressive competitors in the co-working and flexible office
space sector, becoming one of WeWork's fiercest rival.

As the COVID-19 pandemic upended the co-working industry, Knotel,
Inc., and its U.S. subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 21-10146) on Jan. 30, 2021, to pursue a
sale of the assets to Newmark Group.

Knotel estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

Judge Mary F. Walrath oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Milbank LLP as their bankruptcy counsel, Morris
Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP as Delaware bankruptcy co-counsel,
Fenwick & West LLP as corporate counsel, and Moelis & Company LLC
as investment banker and financial advisor.  The Debtors also hired
Ernst & Young LLP to provide tax services.  Omni Agent Solutions is
the claims agent and administrative agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official committee to
represent unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.
The committee is represented by Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP and
Lowenstein Sandler, LLP.


KNOW LABS: Incurs $5.3 Million Net Loss for Quarter Ended Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Know Labs, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q disclosing a net loss of $5.30
million on zero revenue for the three months ended Dec. 31, 2020,
compared to a net loss of $3.01 million on $117,393 of revenue for
the three months ended Dec. 31, 2019.

As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company had $3.22 million in total assets,
$7.87 million in total current liabilities, $14,602 in total
non-current liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $4.66
million.

Net cash used in operating activities was $1,421,000, $3,913,803
and $3,104,035 the three months ended Dec. 31, 2020 and the years
ended Sept. 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The Company anticipates that it will record losses from operations
for the foreseeable future.  As of Dec. 31, 2020, the Company's
accumulated deficit was $61,265,612.  The Company has limited
capital resources.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.  The audit report
prepared by the Company's independent registered public accounting
firm relating to its consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2020 includes an explanatory paragraph expressing
the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

"The Company believes that its cash on hand will be sufficient to
fund our operations until July 31, 2021.  The Company may need
additional financing to implement our business plan and to service
our ongoing operations and pay our current debts.  There can be no
assurance that we will be able to secure any needed funding, or
that if such funding is available, the terms or conditions would be
acceptable to us.  If we are unable to obtain additional financing
when it is needed, we will need to restructure our operations, and
divest all or a portion of our business.  We may seek additional
capital through a combination of private and public equity
offerings, debt financings and strategic collaborations.  Debt
financing, if obtained, may involve agreements that include
covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific
actions, such as incurring additional debt, and could increase our
expenses and require that our assets secure such debt.  Equity
financing, if obtained, could result in dilution to the Company's
then-existing stockholders and/or require such stockholders to
waive certain rights and preferences.  If such financing is not
available on satisfactory terms, or is not available at all, the
Company may be required to delay, scale back, eliminate the
development of business opportunities and our operations and
financial condition may be materially adversely affected," Know
Labs said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1074828/000165495421001737/knwn_10q.htm

                            About Know Labs

Know Labs, Inc., was incorporated under the laws of the State of
Nevada in 1998.  Since 2007, the Company has been focused primarily
on research and development of proprietary technologies which can
be used to authenticate and diagnose a wide variety of organic and
non-organic substances and materials.  The Company's Common Stock
trades on the OTCQB Exchange under the symbol "KNWN."

Know Labs reported a net loss of $13.56 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $7.61 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company had
$4.68 million in total assets, $6.57 million in total current
liabilities, $23,256 in total non-current liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $1.91 million.

BPM LLP, in Walnut Creek, California, the Company's auditor since
2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Dec. 29, 2020, citing that the Company has sustained a net loss
from operations and has an accumulated deficit since inception.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.


KNOWLTON DEVELOPMENT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Knowlton Development Corporation Inc. and other ratings
that are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was
conducted through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9,
2021 in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings
in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Knowlton Development Corporation, Inc.'s ("KDC/ONE") B3 Corporate
Family Rating reflects the company's high financial leverage,
aggressive appetite for partially debt financed acquisitions and
partially debt financed shareholder distributions, revenue and
earnings volatility based on customer volume and product
development, and some customer concentration. The rating is
supported by the company's growing presence as a global
manufacturer specializing in custom formulation, packaging and
manufacturing solutions for beauty, personal care and home care
brands, supported by solid innovation capabilities, and long
standing customer relationships, and raw material pass-through
arrangements that minimize exposure to volatile input prices.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


LADAN INC: Files Projections Ahead of March 9 Hearing
-----------------------------------------------------
Ladan Inc. filed its five-year projections in connection with its
Combined Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

A hearing is scheduled for March 9, 2021, at 1:30 p.m.

According to the plan projections, the Debtor will pay general
unsecured creditors $25,127 per quarter throughout the five-year
term of the Plan.

On Feb. 18, 2021, the Debtor filed a Plan that provides for holders
of undisputed general unsecured claims to share in a fund totaling
$502,544, which will likely result to a 10% recovery.  The Debtor
will pay $25,127 per quarter for a period of 20 quarters to finance
the GUC fund.

In the prior iteration of the Plan, unsecured creditors were to
receive a total of $401,890, for a recovery of 8%.

A full-text copy of the combined plan and disclosure statement
dated Feb. 18, 2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3pAYqEJfrom
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

A copy of the Feb. 19, 2021 plan projections is available at
https://bit.ly/2Zz0hz1

                     About Ladan Inc.

Ladan, Inc. -- http://ludwigsfinewine.com/-- is a privately held
company that owns and operates wine, beer, and liquor stores.
Ladan, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 20-30130) on Feb. 6, 2020.  The
case is assigned to Judge Dennis Montali. In the petition signed by
Magid Nazari, president, the Debtor had $258,503 in assets and
$7,672,414 in liabilities.  Jeffrey Goodrich, Esq., at GOODRICH &
ASSOCIATES, is the Debtor's counsel.


LAGO RESORT: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'CCC-', Outlook Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on New York
casino operator Lago Resort & Casino to 'CCC-' from 'CCC', its
issue-level rating on its first-lien debt to 'CCC+' from 'B-', and
its issue-level rating on its second-lien term loan to 'C' from
'CC'.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's belief that a restructuring of
some form is increasingly likely in the next six months given the
elevated likelihood of a covenant violation in the first quarter of
2021 and the company's sizable debt maturities due in September.

The downgrade reflects Lago's increasing likelihood of default
because of its weak liquidity and sizable near-term debt
maturities. S&P said, "The company has minimal excess cash on hand
and we expect its cash flow generation will be insufficient to fund
all of its cash fixed charges this year. Additionally, Lago's $10
million revolver and a $20 million term loan (unrated) mature in
September 2021. We do not expect the company to be able to meet
these debt maturities absent some form of capital raise, which we
believe could be challenging given our view that its credit
measures were unsustainable prior to the emergence of COVID-19.
This increases the risk that it will experience a payment default
or engage in a restructuring transaction that provides its lenders
with less than they were originally promised, which we would view
as a distressed exchange."

S&P said, "We expect Lago to violate its financial maintenance
covenants when testing resumes in the March 2021 quarter. In 2020,
the company's lenders agreed to suspend covenant testing for the
June, September, and December 2020 quarters. Absent an additional
waiver or amendment from its lenders, its covenant testing will
resume in the first quarter of 2021. Although the 2020 amendment
modified how its EBITDA is calculated for the purposes of measuring
its covenant compliance and will annualize its first-quarter 2021
EBITDA in measuring its first-quarter covenants, we expect Lago's
EBITDA to be significantly impaired in the first quarter relative
to 2019 given the material operating restrictions due to COVID-19,
including an early closure requirement. The company's credit
agreement contains an equity cure provision, whereby equity
contributions are treated as EBITDA for the purposes of calculating
its covenant compliance.

"Lago's owners have provided it with material equity support in the
past to enable it to maintain its covenant compliance, facilitate
its amendments, and repay debt. However, we believe there are
limits to the amount of support its owners will be willing to
provide, given the entity's already unsustainable capital structure
prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and our view that the significant
operating restrictions related to the pandemic are exacerbating
Lago's inability to service its capital structure and meet its
future debt obligations. We expect the company's operating
performance to remain weak at least through the first half of 2021
because of significant COVID-19 operating restrictions and its long
closure in 2020, which we believe may have led its customers to
frequent other nearby casinos." Lago's nearest competitors are both
Native American gaming operators. Because they operate on sovereign
land, both casinos reopened sooner than Lago and are not subject to
the same state-imposed operating restrictions.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors for this
credit rating change:

-- Health and safety

S&P said, "The negative outlook on Lago reflects our expectation
that it will likely engage in a debt exchange or restructuring that
we consider to be distressed given its limited access to the
capital markets and weak liquidity, which is compounded by the
upcoming maturities of $30 million of its debt in September 2021 as
well as our forecast for a covenant violation as of the March 2021
measurement date absent an equity cure or further waiver from its
lenders.

"We could lower our rating on Lago if it completes an exchange
offer, restructuring, or other action (including maturity
extensions) that we view as distressed because it provides its
lenders with less than they were originally promised, misses an
interest or principal payment, or files for bankruptcy.

"We could raise our rating on Lago if we no longer believe it will
engage in a distressed transaction in the near term. This would
most likely occur if the company's cash flow recovers sufficiently
such that we believe it would cover its cash fixed charges and it
is able to access the capital markets to address its 2021
maturities in a manner that we don't view as distressed."


LAX IN-FLITE: Seeks to Hire G&B Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
LAX In-Flite Services, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to hire G&B Law, LLP
as its bankruptcy counsel.

The firm will provide these services:

     a. advise Debtor as to its duties, rights and powers;

     b. represent the Debtor, with respect to bankruptcy issues, in
the context of its pending Chapter 11 case and represent the Debtor
in contested matters that would affect the administration of the
case;

     c. assist the Debtor in negotiating and seeking court approval
to sell substantially all its assets and in formulating and
confirming a Chapter 11 plan;

     d. render services for the purpose of pursuing, litigating or
settling litigation;

     e. other legal services.

The firm received a total of $100,000 as a pre-banruptc retainer.

Jeremy Rothstein, Esq., a partner at G&B Law, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" within the meaning
of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeremy Rothstein, Esq.
     G&B LAW, LLP
     16000 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1000
     Encino, CA 91436
     Tel: 818-382-6200
     Fax: 818-986-6534
     Email: jrothstein@gblawllp.com

                   About LAX In-Flite Services

LAX In-Flite Services, LLC filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case
No. 21-10956) on Feb. 5, 2021.  Mark Berlin, authorized
representative, signed the petition.  In the petition, the Debtor
disclosed $212,676 in assets and $6,532,846 in liabilities.

Judge Neil W. Bason oversees the case.  G&B LAW, LLP serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


LBLA VENTURES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: LBLA Ventures, Inc.
        7770 Venture Street
        Colorado Springs, CO 80951

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 21-10805

Judge: Hon. Joseph G. Rosania Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: David J. Warner, Esq.
                  WADSWORTH GARBER WARNER CONRARDY, P.C.
                  2580 West Main Street
                  Suite 200
                  Littleton, CO 80120
                  Tel: 303-296-1999
                  E-mail: dwarner@wgwc-law.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Aaron Avery, CEO.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/OZX4QNY/LBLA_Ventures_Inc__cobke-21-10805__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


LEWISBERRY PARTNERS: Selling 3 Lewisberry Properties for $792K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Lewisberry Partnership, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the entry of an Order:

       (i) granting expedited consideration, shortened time and
limited notice;

       (ii) granting the Debtor authority to sell at private sales
the Real Properties located at (a) 2 Kingswood Drive, in
Lewisberry, Pennsylvania 17339, to Andrew J. Kaehler and Peggy A.
Kaehler for $257,000; (b) 8 Kingswood Drive, in Lewisberry,
Pennsylvania 17339, to Kristine Fischer and Jamie T. Fischer for
$265,000; and (c) 16 Kingswood Drive, in Lewisberry, Pennsylvania
17339, to Bobby Hile and Sara Hile for $270,000; and

       (iii) to assume certain Prepetition Agreements of Sale
("Prepetition Agreements of Sale") for the Real Properties and the
purchasers.

Since 2018, the Debtor has been in the business of buying, leasing,
and selling single-family residential real property located in
Lewisberry, Pennsylvania.  On June 26, 2019, it acquired 30
improved townhomes located in Lewisberry, York County, Pennsylvania
("Lewisberry Properties") in the community commonly known as
Glenbrook Townhomes at Pleasant View.  The Debtor acquired the
Lewisberry Properties from Eastern Development & Planning, Inc.,
for a purchase price of $4 million.

The Lewisberry Properties were approved for development in the
Final Subdivision Plan for Phases 2 & 3 of Revised Pleasant View
Planned Residential Development, recorded in the Office of the
Recorder of Deeds in and for York County, Pennsylvania in Plan Book
SS, Page 709. The Real Properties are part of the Lewisberry
Properties.  Each of the lots contained within the Project consists
of a residential dwelling.

In addition to offering the residential dwellings for sale, the
Debtor also leases certain of the Lewisberry Properties.

Prior to the Petition Date, on June 26, 2019, and in order to fund
the purchase of the Lewisberry Properties, the Debtor borrowed
funds from Loan Funders LLC, Series 7693 ("Lender") in the original
principal amount of $8.025 million ("Loan") as memorialized in that
certain Commercial Promissory Note and that certain Loan and
Security Agreement each dated June 26, 2019.

As security for its obligations to the Lender, also on June 26,
2019, the Debtor, as mortgagor, executed and delivered a Purchase
Money Mortgage to the Lender, as mortgagee, in which the Debtor
granted the Lender a first mortgage on the Lewisberry Properties as
well as a security interest, inter alia, in and to all of its
present and future fixtures, rents, profits, and income from the
Lewisberry Properties and to the extent that it is determined after
trial on the Debtor's claims, that Lender holds a valid, perfected
and non-avoidable security interest, which the Debtor disputes, the
Lender's security interest in the Lewisberry Collateral or in the
proceeds thereof constitutes the cash collateral of Lender.

In addition to the Lewisberry Mortgage and as additional security
for the Debtor's obligation to Lender, and also on June 26, 2019,
certain members of the Debtor, Richard J. Puleo and Lorraine B.
Puleo, as mortgagors, executed and delivered a Purchase Money
Mortgage to the Lender, as mortgagee, in which the Puleos pledged a
first priority mortgage on 20 improved townhomes located in
Lewisberry, Pennsylvania ("Puleo Properties") also located in
Glenbrook, but owned solely in the name of the Puleos.  The Puleo
Properties are located at Lots 59 through 78 Scully Place, Fairview
Township, York County, PA.

As of the petition date, the Lender had asserted a secured claim
against the Debtor in the amount of $8.6 million.  The Debtor
disputes the liens and claims of the Lender and will be scheduling
the claim of the Lender as "Disputed" in its Schedules of Assets
and Liabilities.  The Debtor intends to immediately institute an
Adversary Proceeding asserting claims against the Lender and its
servicer Fay for, inter alia, breach of the Duty of Good Faith and
Fair Dealing, Breach of Contract, and for Equitable Subordination
pursuant to Section 510 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Since the date of the Note, the Lender has turned over servicing of
the Loan Documents to Fay Servicing, LLC, which has repeatedly and
intentionally interfered with the operations and contracts of the
Debtor in violation of the Loan Documents and applicable law by,
inter alia, attempting to change the agreed-upon release prices to
the sale of certain of the Lewisberry Properties, thereby
preventing the closing on the sale of the Real Properties.

Pursuant to Section 2.21(d)(vii) of the Lewisberry Mortgage, the
release price for the sale of any of the individual Lewisberry
Properties equals 120% of the allocated loan amount for each of the
Released Properties.

The Release Prices for the Real Properties are calculated as: (i) 2
Kingswood Drive - $223,177.57; (ii) Kingswood Drive - $218,714.01;
and (iii) 16 Kingswood Drive - $223,177.57.

After weeks of delay, the Debtor was then told "committee" review
was being undertaken, which it believes was and is false.  The
repeated delays have frustrated and prejudiced any efforts of the
Debtor to sell the Real Properties and to refinance the Loan.  The
Debtor avers that Fay administers loans with the purpose of
manufacturing and/or forcing a default.  The Lender's refusal to
accept the agreed-upon Release Price is a breach of the Loan
Documents, its duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing, implied in
every contract under Pennsylvania law, and being taken in bad
faith.  The Debtor has had a number of opportunities to refinance,
to which Fay and the
Lender have never responded.  As a consequence, the Debtor avers
that the lien and claim of the Lender are subject to a bonafide
dispute.

Prior to the filing of the Petition, the Debtor had the Real
Properties under Prepetition Agreements of Sale at private sales.

The Debtor first put 2 Kingswood on the market in September 2020
and negotiated with the Kaehlers, for the sale of 2 Kingswood by
private sale.  Prior to the Petition date, it was able to reach an
agreement in principle for the sale of 2 Kingswood for $257,000
without contingencies as set forth in greater detail in the
Agreement of Sale.  The Debtor believes that a sale of 2 Kingswood,
was negotiated in the ordinary course of business, at full price,
and will best serve the interests of creditors by procuring the
almost instant cash infusion of $257,000, and by preventing the
further loss and diminution in value to 2 Kingswood by continued
operation in an undercapitalized state.

The Debtor first put 8 Kingswood on the market in September 2020
and negotiated with the Fischers for the sale of 8 Kingswood by
private sale.  Prior to the Petition Date, it was able to reach an
agreement in principle for the sale of 8 Kingswood for $265,000
without contingencies as set forth in greater detail in the
Agreement of Sale.  The Debtor believes that a sale of 8 Kingswood
was negotiated in the ordinary course of business, at full price,
and will best serve the interests of creditors by procuring the
almost instant cash infusion of $265,000, and by preventing the
further loss and diminution in value to 8 Kingswood by continued
operation in an undercapitalized state.

As indicated, in order to preserve the sale of 8 Kingswood, the
Debtor had to offer the Fischers a Pre-Settlement Possession
Addendum to Agreement of Sale because the Fischers sold their prior
house and moved from Ohio to Pennsylvania in reliance on their
ability to obtain possession of 8 Kingswood.

The Debtor first put 16 Kingswood on the market in September 2020
and negotiated with the Hiles, for the sale of 16 Kingswood by
private sale.  Prior to the Petition Date, it was able to reach an
agreement in principle for the sale of 16 Kingswood for $270,000
without contingencies as set forth in greater detail in the
Agreement of Sale.  The Debtor believes that a sale of 16 Kingswood
was negotiated in the ordinary course of business, at full price,
and will best serve the interests of creditors by procuring the
almost instant cash infusion of $270,000, and by preventing the
further loss and diminution in value to 16 Kingswood by continued
operation in an undercapitalized state.

The Debtor now asks to sell by private sale the Real Properties
under Section 363(b),(f), and (m), and to assume at settlement, the
Prepetition Sales Agreements pursuant to Section 365(a).  In order
to close the Sales pursuant to the Prepetition Agreements of Sale,
the Debtor must assume the contracts.  The Debtor will cure any
default in the Prepetition Agreements of Sale by closing on the
Sales, and delivery of the Real Properties free and clear of all
liens claims and encumbrances, with all respective liens attaching
to the proceeds of the Sale.  

The Real Properties are in good condition and the Debtor has
invested in the maintenance and upkeep of the residences on the
Real Properties, but the Debtor asks approval of a sale of the Real
Properties at private sales, on an "as-is" and "where-is" basis,
without any warranty, either express or implied, with all defects,
except that the Real Properties are to be sold free and clear of
all liens, claims, and encumbrances, with liens, if any are
ultimately allowed, tracing to the proceeds.  In other words, the
Real Properties are being sold subject to all known and unknown
conditions.

The Debtor intends to retain all net proceeds from the sale of the
Real Properties until such time as the Lien of the Lender is deemed
Allowed and the value of its real property can be determined.  It
avers that the Lender is undersecured.

The Debtor employed Valerie Taylor designated agent of Keller
Williams of Central PA as the broker for the Real Properties.  The
Purchasers employed brokers to facilitate the sale of the Real
Properties as follows: (i) Kaehlers employed George Park and Shawn
McGeehan of BHHS Homesale Realty for the purchase of 2 Kingswood,
(ii) Fischers employed David Leister of Country Home Real Estate
Inc. for the purchase of 8 Kingswood, and (iii) Hiles employed
Kelly Kosh of Century 21 Realty Services for the purchase of 16
Kingswood.  The names and addresses of the brokers were disclosed
to both the Debtor and Purchasers prior to the signing of the
Agreement of Sale.

The Debtor asks that the Sale Order be effective immediately by
providing that the 14-day stay under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) is
waived.

Finally, in accordance with Local Bankruptcy Rules 5070-1(f) and
9014-1, the Trustee asks expedited consideration of the Motion.
Expedited consideration is required in order to allow the Debtor to
sell the Real Properties, to reduce costs associated with the sale
as set forth above.  The Debtor asks approval of the request for
expedited consideration pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 9014-2 on
or before on the earliest possible date available to the Court.   

A copy of the Agreements is available at
https://tinyurl.com/du2ujy42 from PacerMonitor.com.

The Purchasers:

         Kristine Fischer and Jamie T. Fischer
         3420 Kingston
         York, PA 17402

         Bobby Hile and Sara Hile
         3628 Petre Road
         Springfield, OH 45502

                  About Lewisberry Partners, LLC

Lewisberry Partners, LLC is primarily engaged in renting and
leasing real estate properties. It sought protection under Chapter
11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 21-10327)
on February 9, 2021. In the petition signed by Richard J. Puleo,
managing member, the Debtor disclosed up to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Eric L. Frank oversees the case.

Edmond M. George, Esq. at OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP
is
the Debtor's counsel.



LIGHTHOUSE RESOURCES: MBTL Selling Equipment to NWA for $75K
------------------------------------------------------------
Lighthouse Resources, Inc. and affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the sale of
Millennium Bulk Terminals-Longview, LLC ("MBTL")'s interests in
certain furniture, fixtures, equipment, machinery, vehicles,
apparatus, appliances, implements, supplies, tools and various
other tangible personal property more fully set forth on Exhibit B,
utilized in connection with the operation of a dock facility on the
Columbia River in Longview, Washington, to Northwest Alloys,
Inc.("NWA") for $75,000, free and clear of liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests.

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 9, 2021, at 1:00 p.m.
(ET).  The Objection Deadline is March 2, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

As set forth more fully in the Debtors' Motion for Entry of an
Order (I) Approving the Transition Services Agreement between
Millennium Bulk Terminals-Longview, LLC and Northwest Alloys, Inc.,
(II) Authorizing Rejection of the Millennium Ground Lease and
Certain Related Agreements Effective as of January 8, 2021, and
(III) Granting Related Relief, MBTL and Northwest Alloys, Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("NWA"), entered into a Transition Services
Agreement, dated Dec. 23, 2020, as amended and restated by the
parties, in which MBTL and NWA agreed to transition control from
MBTL to NWA of certain of MBTL's operations conducted in Cowlitz
County, Washington ("Millennium Operations").

An order approving the relief was entered on Jan. 4, 2021, and the
Millennium Operations were transferred to NWA pursuant to the TSA
on Jan. 9, 2021.

The Equipment constitutes property of the MBTL, and title thereto
is vested in MBTL within the meaning of section 541(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code. As MBTL no longer controls the Millennium
Operations, it has no further use for the Equipment and desires to
sell the Equipment to NWA, free and clear of all liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests, for use in the Millennium Operations.


Consequently, MBTL asks authorization from the Court to sell its
interest in the Equipment to NWA for $75,000 and to enter into an
Agreement for Purchase and Bill of Sale.  The sale of the Equipment
from MBTL to NWA will be an "as is" and "where is" sale, with NWA
waiving all warranties of any kind relating to the Equipment.   

As set forth above, MBTL no longer needs the Equipment. As the
current operator of the Millennium Operations, NWA is the logical
purchaser of the Equipment.  The proposed sale of the Equipment
from MBTL to NWA is an arm'-length transaction.  MBTL believes the
Sales Price is fair and reasonable and that auctioning or
liquidating the Equipment would not result in a greater benefit to
Debtors or the Debtors' estates and instead would result in
additional costs related to marketing, sales commissions, and
additional attorney fees both in connection with completing the
sale in the time required to extend the case to complete such a
sale.  Consequently, the Debtors submit that the sale of the
Equipment to NWA as set forth in the Motion is a sound exercise of
their business judgment.

A copy of the Bill of Sale is available at
https://tinyurl.com/4u8cmao8 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About Lighthouse Resources

Lighthouse Resources Inc., is an owner and operates two coal mines
located in Wyoming and Montana, delivering low sulfur,
subbituminous coal to both domestic and export customers. It also
owns and operates the Millennium Bulk Terminal in Longview,
Washington.The Company is widely recognized for its extraordinary
performance in both safety and environmental stewardship.Its
flagship project is the development of a trade route for coal from
the Rocky Mountain region of the United States to demand centers
in
Asia.

Utah-based Lighthouse Resources and 13 subsidiaries, including
Decker Coal Company, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-13056) on Dec. 3, 2020.

Lighthouse Resources was estimated to have $100 million to $500
million in assets and liabilities as of the filing.

The Debtors tapped JACKSON KELLY PLLC as general bankruptcy
counsel
and BDO USA LLP as restructuring advisor.  POTTER ANDERSON &
CORROON LLP is the local bankruptcy counsel.  LANG LASALLE
AMERICAS, INC. is the marketer and seller of assets related to the
dock facility owned by Millennium  Bulk Terminals-Longview, LLC.
ENERGY VENTURES ANALYSIS is the marketer and seller of Debtors'
coal mining assets.  STRETTO is the claims agent.



LISTO WAY GROUP: Seeks Approval to Hire Bankruptcy Attorneys
------------------------------------------------------------
Listo Way Group, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Louisiana to hire H. Kent Aguillard,
Esq., and Caleb Aguillard, Esq., attorneys practicing in Eunice,
La., to handle its Chapter 11 case.

The attorneys will be paid at these rates:

     H. Kent Aguillard, Esq.     $400 and $475 per hour
     Caleb Aguillard, Esq.       $300 per hour

The Debtor paid the attorneys an initial retainer of $25,000.

Both attorneys do not represent or hold any interest adverse to the
Debtor's estate in the matters upon which they are to be engaged,
according to court filings.

The attorneys can be reached through:

     H. Kent Aguillard, Esq.
     Caleb K. Aguillard, Esq.
     H. Kent Aguillard
     141 S. 6th Street
     Eunice, LA 70535
     Tel: 337-457-9331
     Fax: 337-457-2917
     Email: kent@aguillardlaw.com

                       About Listo Way Group

Listo Way Group, a restaurant franchisee in Louisiana, filed its
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 21-50075) on Feb. 12, 2021.  Jason
Trotter, managing member, signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of less
than $50,000 and liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million.


Judge John W. Kolwe oversees the case.  The Debtor is represented
by H. Kent Aguillard, Esq., and Caleb Aguillard, Esq.


M/I HOMES: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB+
-----------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on February 11, 2021, upgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by M/I Homes Incorporated to BB+ from BB.

Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, M/I Homes, Inc. builds
single-family homes.



M/I HOMES: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'BB-' on Increased Profits
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on Ohio-based
M/I Homes Inc. to 'BB-' from 'B+'.

S&P said, "At the same time, we are affirming our rating on the
company's senior unsecured notes at 'BB-', and we are also revising
our recovery rating to '3' from '2' to reflect the application of
the unsecured debt cap as we assume the size and ranking of debt
and nondebt claims will change prior to a hypothetical default.

"Our stable outlook on M/I Homes is based on our view that its
EBITDA stays at about 2x debt, EBITDA covers interest by more than
10x, and that debt to capital trends below 40%.

"The upgrade reflects significant ongoing profitability improvement
at M/I Homes. We forecast EBITDA will increase by about 20% in
2021, after jumping 50%-plus this past year. These gains are partly
volume-driven, as we anticipate a second straight year of
double-digit-percentage growth in closings in 2021. Indeed, sales
improvements are, in our opinion, balanced across all of M/I's 15
markets. This broad-based demand facilitates margin improvements,
and we expect gross margin to have risen by more than 200 basis
points from 2019 to 2021.

"We think benefits will accrue throughout the housing cycle from
ongoing market share gains. Though the company operates in only 15
markets, we believe 2020 order growth of almost 40% is faster than
the bulk of its competitors (including unrated builders) across
most, if not all, of these locales. In our estimation, no other
production builder's margin improvement in the second half matched
M/I's 250 basis point jump over the six months to December 2020.
More importantly, when the housing cycle turns, we would expect
less profit diminution for M/I as compared to that of builders with
smaller presences in these locales, which we think points to M/I's
superior record, brand, and financial strength."

The company's Smart Series is driving margins, returns, and
discretionary cash flows. Despite an average sales price (ASP)
estimated at just $330,000, these more-affordable units generate
higher gross margins than M/I's traditional move-up product--priced
firmly above its $381,000 overall average (in 2020). Moreover,
Smart Series' relatively fast sales pace translates to higher
returns on capital, which S&P now pegs in the high-teens percents
overall. As such, a larger portion of these quicker-returning
profits is further bolstering free operating cash flows, now
forecast at more than $100 million for 2021.

S&P said, "Our stable outlook on the company is based on our view
that during the next 12 months, debt stays at or below 2x EBITDA,
that EBITDA covers interest by more than 10x, and that debt to
capital trends below 40%. We think M/I's profitability will
continue to trend firmly upward over the next year, due to the
company's strategic and operational initiatives, further aided by
the tailwind of strong broader demand across most U.S. housing
markets. Significantly higher sales backlog levels to start 2021
should help ensure what we assume will be a more than 10% increase
in closings--and at adjusted gross margin levels that continue to
trend higher at almost 25%. Spending this year for new communities
beyond 2021 will be financed via operating cash flows, with debt
unchanged at $900 million.

"We consider these to be two separate routes for M/I Homes to merit
the next higher rating of 'BB'. The first would be to achieve
revenues of about $4 billion, which would approximate or approach
the level for two of the three existing 'BB'-rated builders (KB
Home and Mattamy Group), though much smaller than the third (Taylor
Morrison). Alternatively, the company would need to sustainably
bring debt to EBITDA at or below 2x.

"We expect the company to maintain stronger credit ratios than
typically associated with the rating while the housing industry
remains relatively healthy and stable. Therefore:

"In a healthy market, we would lower our rating on M/I Homes if we
expected it to sustain its debt to EBITDA at more than 3x. We would
anticipate this could occur if the company added almost $500
million in debt for further growth.

"In a weaker-than-expected housing market, we would expect the
current cushion in credit ratios to deteriorate and we would look
to a 4x debt-to-EBITDA threshold for a downgrade. The latter
scenario could occur if EBITDA came in at under $250 million, or
nearly 50% below our 2021 forecast, through say a 10% drop in
revenues and about a 300 basis point decline in EBITDA margins from
2020 levels."


MALLINCKRODT PLC: Asks Judge to OK $114 Million Loan Prepayment
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Hill of Bloomberg News reports that Mallinckrodt PLC has
asked its bankruptcy judge to sign off on a $114 million prepayment
of term loan principal to avoid conflict with those lenders, court
papers show.

The prepayment is required under a credit agreement, and failing to
make it could expose Mallinckrodt to costly default claims, the
drug maker argues in its motion.

Mallinckrodt's bankruptcy plan calls for the reinstatement of its
term loans, although some holders of those loans have said they
don't support the deal.

"In the exercise of their business judgment, the Debtors believe
that making the Mandatory Prepayment is in the best interests of
their estates.  As indicated in previous filings, the Restructuring
Support Agreement provides for the reinstatement of the Term Loans
as part of the Debtors' contemplated plan of reorganization.
Making the  Mandatory Prepayment will avoid potentially creating an
argument that a Default or an Event of Default has occurred under
the Credit Agreement as a result of the non-payment, eliminate the
possibility that the Debtors might be required to pay default
interest on any unpaid amount of the Mandatory Prepayment, and best
position the Debtors in any litigation over reinstatement.  In
addition, as with other cases in which oversecured debt has been
repaid outside of a plan, making the Mandatory Prepayment will
allow the estates to capture direct economic benefits from using
cash earning a lower rate of interest to repay oversecured debt
accruing interest at a higher rate.  And because the Term Loans are
expected to recover in full, making the Mandatory Prepayment at
this time simply advances to the Term Lenders funds that would
otherwise become due to them at a later date, without risking the
incurrence of default interest or other penalties that would reduce
the recoveries of other stakeholders," Michael J. Merchant, of
RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., explained in court filings.

                    About Mallinckrodt PLC

Mallinckrodt is a global business consisting of multiple
wholly-owned subsidiaries that develop, manufacture, market and
distribute specialty pharmaceutical products and therapies. The
company's Specialty Brands reportable segment's areas of focus
include autoimmune and rare diseases in specialty areas like
neurology, rheumatology, nephrology, pulmonology and ophthalmology;
immunotherapy and neonatal respiratory critical care therapies;
analgesics; and gastrointestinal products. Its Specialty Generics
reportable segment includes specialty generic drugs and active
pharmaceutical ingredients.  Visit http://www.mallinckrodt.com/for
more information.

On Oct. 12, 2020, Mallinckrodt plc and certain of its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection in Delaware in the U.S. (Bankr. D.
Del. Lead Case No. 20-12522) to seek approval of a restructuring
that would reduce total debt by $1.3 billion and resolve
opioid-related claims against them.

Mallinckrodt plc disclosed $9,584,626,122 in assets and
$8,647,811,427 in liabilities as of Sept. 25, 2020.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Latham & Watkins LLP and Richards, Layton &
Finger P.A. as their bankruptcy counsel; Arthur Cox and Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz as corporate and finance counsel; Ropes & Gray
LLP as litigation counsel; Torys LLP as CCAA counsel; Guggenheim
Securities LLC as investment banker; and AlixPartners LLP as
restructuring advisor. Prime Clerk, LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Cooley LLP
as its legal counsel, Robinson & Cole LLP as co-counsel, and Dundon
Advisers LLC as its financial advisor.

On Oct. 27, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an
official committee of opioid related claimants.  The OCC tapped
Akin Gump Struss Hauer & Feld LLP as its lead counsel, Cole Schotz
as Delaware co-counsel, Province Inc. as financial advisor, and
Jefferies LLC as investment banker.


MALLINCKRODT PLC: Says Rival Unlawfully Recruited Its Workers
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mallinckrodt PLC commenced an adversary proceeding on Feb. 17,
2021, in Delaware bankruptcy court accusing a competitor of
unlawfully recruiting its employees and causing millions of dollars
of harm to the company.

Law360 reports that in the court filings, Mallinckrodt said
Dendreon Pharmaceuticals hired two Mallinckrodt employees to senior
executive positions last summer of 2020 and since then has been
recruiting other Mallinckrodt workers to resign and join Dendreon
in violation of their employment agreements. The suit also names
several individuals who Mallinckrodt said took jobs at Dendreon
while still employed with the debtor and used their "dual
employment" status to induce others to leave Mallinckrodt.

"The ongoing harm to Mallincrodt due to the Defendants' unlawful
activities is substantial and irreparable.  Although it is not
possible to quantify the impact of Dendreon's unfair competition at
this time, these employee departures will likely cost the Company
millions of dollars in lost sales, onboarding costs to hire and
train replacement employees, and harm to customer relationships and
company goodwill," the Complaint said.

Millinckrodt seeks, among other things: (1) preliminary and
permanent injunctive relief to enjoin further tortious conduct and
contractual breaches by the Defendants; (2) damages stemming from
the Defendants' unlawful and unfair competition; (3) a declaratory
judgment declaring the parties' rights and obligations under
applicable contracts; and (4) the recovery and withholding of
salary, incentive compensation, and/or benefits fraudulently
obtained by the Individual Defendants.

The case is Mallinckrodt Enterprises LLC et al v. Kurt Brushaber,
Alan Killick, Douglas Gill, Andrew Winecoff, Joseph Smith, and
Dendreon Pharmacueticals LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Sanpower
Group Co., Ltd. Adv. Proc. Case No. 21-50139, In re Mallinckrodt
PLC, et al. (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-12522).

                    About Mallinckrodt PLC

Mallinckrodt is a global business consisting of multiple
wholly-owned subsidiaries that develop, manufacture, market and
distribute specialty pharmaceutical products and therapies. The
company's Specialty Brands reportable segment's areas of focus
include autoimmune and rare diseases in specialty areas like
neurology, rheumatology, nephrology, pulmonology and ophthalmology;
immunotherapy and neonatal respiratory critical care therapies;
analgesics; and gastrointestinal products. Its Specialty Generics
reportable segment includes specialty generic drugs and active
pharmaceutical ingredients.  On the Web:
http://www.mallinckrodt.com/

On Oct. 12, 2020, Mallinckrodt plc and certain of its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection in Delaware in the U.S. (Bankr. D.
Del. Lead Case No. 20-12522) to seek approval of a restructuring
that would reduce total debt by $1.3 billion and resolve
opioid-related claims against them.

Mallinckrodt plc disclosed $9,584,626,122 in assets and
$8,647,811,427 in liabilities as of Sept. 25, 2020.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Latham & Watkins LLP and Richards, Layton &
Finger P.A. as their bankruptcy counsel; Arthur Cox and Wachtell,
Lipton, Rosen & Katz as corporate and finance counsel; Ropes & Gray
LLP as litigation counsel; Torys LLP as CCAA counsel; Guggenheim
Securities LLC as investment banker; and AlixPartners LLP as
restructuring advisor. Prime Clerk, LLC is the claims agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Cooley LLP
as its legal counsel, Robinson & Cole LLP as co-counsel, and Dundon
Advisers LLC as its financial advisor.

On Oct. 27, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an
official committee of opioid related claimants.  The OCC tapped
Akin Gump Struss Hauer & Feld LLP as its lead counsel, Cole Schotz
as Delaware co-counsel, Province Inc. as financial advisor, and
Jefferies LLC as investment banker.


MARY CECILIA RIDGEWAY: Flemisters Buying Corona Property for $838K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mary Cecilia Ridgeway asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to authorize the sale of the
residential real property located at 1121 Hummingbird Lane, in
Corona, Riverside County, California, APN 102-192-015, to Clayton
and Amy Flemister for $838,000, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 11, 2021, at 1:30 p.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed no later than 14 days prior to
the hearing date.

Shortly after the Petition Date, Agent Hugo Balarezo began working
with the Debtor to get the Residence ready for listing.  The Debtor
filed an application to employ the Agent as the Estate's real
estate agent on Jan. 25, 2021.  No opposition has been filed to the
application to employ Agent and an order on the employment is
pending before the Court.  The U.S. Trustee requested a
supplemental declaration be filed by the Agent before the Debtor
submits a proposed order.  The supplemental declaration is
forthcoming.

The Debtor owns the Residence with a scheduled value of $845,000
which is her residence. There is a first deed of trust ("1st DOT")
recorded against the Residence owed approximately $670,000 in favor
of Select 24 Portfolio Servicing, Inc. based on the Notice of
Trustee Sale that was sent to the Debtor just a couple weeks before
filing the Case.

There is a Riverside County Tax Collector ("RCTC") statutory lien
against the Residence owed approximately $3,150.27.  There is also
a judgment lien recorded against the Residence owed approximately
$4,606.38 in favor of American Express Bank, FSB ("AMX") and
recorded on Nov. 16, 2011 as Instrument No. 2011-0511112 in
Riverside County.

The Debtor filed a previous Chapter 7 and received a discharge.
She was unaware of the AMX Lien at the time of filing.  AMX's
counsel has agreed to enter into a stipulation to allow AMX's claim
to be treated as wholly unsecured and will not receive payment from
the sale.

On Schedule C, the Debtor claimed a homestead exemption as to the
equity in the Residence in the amount of $488,250.  She has
discussed the value, condition and market conditions with the Agent
and has determined the Value to be an accurate value.  The
estimated Value of the Residence is based on market conditions in
the area and both an interior and exterior inspection of the
Residence completed by the Agent.  The Debtor estimates that there
will be net proceeds from the sale of approximately $105,000 if the
Residence is sold for the Value estimated.

The Residence is to. be sold and the proceeds will be enough to pay
all the administrative costs in the case and all of the claims in
the case as well as allow the Debtor to reinvest her homestead
exemption in something more economically feasible for her
going-forward budget.  The Debtor has conducted a search of all
known liens, claims, and interests in the Residence as set forth in
the Preliminary Title Report, there are no other claims against the
Residence for which she is aware.  

Title to the Residence is held as Mary C Ridgeway, married woman,
who previously took title as Mary C Ridgeway, an unmarried woman.

A Trustee Sale was set by her lender for Jan. 6, 2021.  The Debtor
retained counsel to file an emergency voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on Jan. 5, 2021.  She now
proposes to sell the Residence free and clear of all liens, claims
and interests.

On Jan. 9, 2021, the Debtor received an offer from the Buyers for
$845,000, and she and the Buyers entered into a Real Estate
Purchase Agreement ("REPA") which required the Buyers to make an
initial deposit with escrow of $25,200.  However, after inspections
and an appraisal, the Buyers requested various concessions and the
Debtor conceded to some after negotiations ensued.  These
concessions are discussed in Request for Repairs 1 and 2
("Addendums") which are attached to the REPA and found at pages 26
through 30 of Exhibit 2.  Based on the Addendums, the Buyers' are
offering to buy the Residence for $845,000 and receiving total
credits of $7,000 at the closing of escrow.  

The Agent has agreed, upon consummation of a sale, to a real estate
agent's commission in an amount equal to 5% of the purchase price,
provided that the Estate nets at least such like amount.  This
makes the Offer Price the equivalent of a sale price of $838,000
("Initial Bid") by anyone else making an offer where they would be
receiving no credits.  The Buyer's offer is the highest and best
offer received by the Debtor to date.  The Debtor has determined
that it is in the best interest of the Estate to proceed with the
sale of the Residence to the Buyers for the Offer Price under the
terms contained in the REPA.

In connection with the sale, the Debtor anticipates paying the
First DOT, all real property taxes owed to the Riverside County Tax
Collector and secured against the Residence, in full in connection
with the sale.  She also anticipates paying all costs of sale in
accordance with the REPA which includes the real estate agent
commission in the amount of 5% of the Offer Price of the Residence.
Assuming a purchase price of $845,000, the amount of $42,250 will
be paid to Agent when the sale is completed.

The Debtor proposes to distribute the sale proceeds, from the sale,
in the amounts estimated below and in the following manner:

       Sale Price                                   $845,000
       1St DOT                                     ($670,000)
       Riverside County Property Taxes             ($  3,200)
       Brokers’ Commissions (5% ofnet sales price) ($ 42,250)
       Title, escrow, taxes, recording charges     ($ 16,900)
            (approximately 2%)
       Credits to Buyers Per Addendums to REPA     ($  7,000)
       Estimated "Net Proceeds" from Escrow         $105,650
       Homestead Exemption                          $488,250

The Net Proceeds are to be paid to the Debtor's Counsel's trust
account, with the AMX Lien and the Debtor's Homestead Exemption
attaching to the Net Proceeds if a stipulation is not filed with
the Court prior to the hearing on the Motion, and no further
distribution/use of those funds will be made until further order of
the Court.

The proposed sale is subject to overbids.  The initial deposit will
be refundable only if the conditions to the sale are not satisfied
or the Buyers are not the successful bidders in the event overbids
are received.  The proposed sale will be "as is, where is," "with
all faults," and with no warranties, and the transfer of the
Residence will be by grant deed.

The Bid Deadline is March 10, 2021, at 5:00 p.m.  Any Overbid must
provide for a minimum purchase price of at least $845,000 based on
the exact terms of the Offer Price or $838,000 if the Bidder is not
seeking credits of $7,000 like the Buyers do.  Any Overbid must not
contain any financing, due diligence, or any other contingency fee,
termination fee, or any similar fee or expense reimbursement.  Any
Overbid must be accompanied by a deposit of $25,200.  

If the Debtor receives a timely, conforming Overbid for the
Residence, the Court will conduct an auction of such Residence at
the hearing, in which all Qualified Bidders may participate.  The
increments for bidding (after an initial Overbid of $10,000) is in
$1,000 increments or more.  The bidding will commence at $848,000
($10,000 over the Buyers' Initial Bid of $838,000 taking into
account their credit) or $855,000 based on the same terms as the
Offer Price.  The Court will determine which of the bids is the
best bid.  The Successful Bidder must pay, at the closing, all
amounts reflected in the Best Bid in cash and such other
consideration as agreed upon.

In compliance with Rule 6004(f)(1), the Debtor will provide a copy
of the escrow closing statement to the Office of the United States
Trustee within 10 days of the close of escrow.

The Debtor asks that the Court authorizes the sale to be
effectuated immediately upon entry of the order approving the
Motion, waiving the 14-day stay required under Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the REPA is available at https://tinyurl.com/1kowp6lk
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

The Purchasers:

          Clayton and Amy Flemister
          835 E Sandpoint Ct
          Carson, CA

Mary Cecilia Ridgeway sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 21-10018) on Jan. 5, 2021.  The Debtor tapped Summer
Shaw, Esq., as counsel.



MATTHEW O'REILLY: Foxtrot Burger Owner in Chapter 7
---------------------------------------------------
Patrick Rehkamp of Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal reports
that Matty O'Reilly, the man behind St. Paul's Foxtrot Burger Spot,
Bar Brigade and Minneapolis' Republic, has filed for personal
bankruptcy protection.

Those restaurants closed amidst the Covid-19 pandemic and
government-mandated shutdowns and restrictions.  His restaurant
consultancy business, Banner Year Advisors, also closed in 2020,
according to a Business Journal story.

O'Reilly lists liabilities of more than $3 million and assets of
roughly $643,000 in the filing.

Among the biggest creditors that appear to be business-related from
the November filing:

   * Rick Guntzel, O'Reilly's business partner in several ventures,
has a $803,000 non-priority unsecured claim related to a
partnership buyout.

   * Sarasota, Fla.-based Preston Properties has a $447,344
non-priority unsecured claim related to a personal guaranty or
commercial lease. It's unclear which property that involves.

   * St. Paul-based Firstborne Properties has a $337,999
non-priority unsecured claim related to a personal guaranty or
commercial lease. It's unclear which property that involves.

The U.S. Small Business Administration has a $266,000 non-priority
unsecured claim related to a Paycheck Protection Program loan.
There's also a similar item listing the SBA for $210,000.

Marc Maslow has a $110,000 non-priority unsecured claim related to
a seller-financed business sale from 2017.  Mr.Maslow owned Dan
Kelly's Bar & Grill in downtown Minneapolis. O'Reilly and Guntzel
bought the bar in 2015.

O'Reilly told the Business Journal he had to shut everything down
when his Paycheck Protection Program money ran out.

"It has been a tough year for myself and my industry," O'Reilly
said in an email to the Business Journal. "A number of things have
happened within and beyond my control... Without investors and
partners, my company was left in a very vulnerable position... I'm
owning everything that has happened and truly grateful for my
health, my family and friends, and all of the things I've learned
over this past year to be a better human."

He predicted at least part of his problems back in March, when he
told the Business Journal, "Businesses will go under.  I'll be 100%
transparent: At least one of my businesses won't make it."

O'Reilly filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection, which typically
provides for the liquidation of assets to satisfy creditor claims,
while Chapter 11 protection is typically about restructuring
creditor obligations.  

When small business owners go through personal bankruptcy, their
business interests, personal guarantees and household financed are
often intertwined in the filing, according to attorney Dennis
Monroe, co-founder and chairman of Monroe Moxness Berg. Monroe
added he's a friend of O'Reilly.

                      About Matt O'Reilly

According to PacerMonitor.com, Matthew H. O'Reilly filed a Chapter
7 petition (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 20-32639) on Nov. 13, 2020.

Mr. O'Reilly lists liabilities of more than $3 million and assets
of roughly $643,000 in the filing.  He owns the Foxtrot Burger Spot
restaurant in St. Paul, Minnesota.


MBM SAND: March 23 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 12, 2021, debtor MBM Sand Company, LLC, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston, a
Combined Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

On Feb. 16, 2021, Judge Eduardo Rodriguez conditionally approved
the Disclosure Statement and ordered that:

     * March 16, 2021, is the deadline for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

     * March 19, 2021, is the deadline for filing ballots accepting
or rejecting the Plan.

     * March 23, 2021, at 1:30 p.m., is fixed for the hearing on
confirmation of the Plan and final approval of the Disclosure
Statement which shall be conducted electronically before the United
States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 16, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3ub07Mp from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Pendergraft & Simon, LLP
     Leonard H. Simon
     William P. Haddock
     Texas Bar No. 00793875
     S.D. Tex. Adm. No. 19637
     2777 Allen Parkway, Suite 800
     Houston, TX 77019
     Tel. (713) 528-8555
     Fax. (713) 868-1267

                  About MBM Sand Company

MBM Sand Company, LLC, which is primarily engaged sand mining
business, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
20-32883) on June 1, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
disclosed assets of $1 million to $10 million and estimated
liabilities of the same range.  Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez oversees
the case.  The Debtor has tapped Pendergraft & Simon LLP, led by
Leonard Simon, Esq., as its legal counsel.


MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGIES: Seeks Aug. 31 Plan Confirmation Extension
------------------------------------------------------------------
Mechanical Technologies Corp., dba Alpine Air, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada to extend the time in
which it may obtain confirmation of a Plan of Reorganization, from
March 31, 2021 to August 31, 2021.

The Debtor filed its Disclosure Statement and its Plan of
Reorganization on March 24, 2020.  The Debtor says that a hearing
for approval of the Disclosure Statement is currently scheduled for
March 18, 2021 at 10 a.m.  The Debtor tells the Court it intends to
file a stipulation and order to continue the March 18 hearing date
to sometime in June 2021.  The Debtor relates that after the
Disclosure Statement is approved, it can schedule a hearing to
consider confirmation of its Plan.  The Debtor further relates that
the confirmation hearing cannot take place within the 45-day time
period provided under 11 U.S.C. Section 1129(e), and that the
Debtor needs a 154-day extension from March 31 or up to August 31.

"The Debtor's Plan is feasible and the Debtor has made good-faith
efforts to resolve its creditor claims.  A compromise and
settlement pursuant to Rule 9109 was reached between the Debtor and
J.W. McClenahan Co., one of the Debtor's largest unsecured
creditors, and was approved by this Court on January 21, 2021.
Additionally, the Debtor has employed a forensic accountant, whose
duties include but are not limited to reviewing the Debtor's books
and records, valuing the equipment, machinery, leasehold
improvements, vehicles and trucks retained and transferred from
Debtor, and determining if the Debtor is owed any accounts
receivables from certain parties.  The Debtor is awaiting the
forensic accountant's final report," the Debtor explains.

                    About Mechanical Technologies

Mechanical Technologies d/b/a Alpine Air --
http://alpineheatingandair.com/-- specializes in offering
single-source contracting for all residential and commercial
design/build needs.  The Company services and installs residential
heating and air conditioners.  Alpine Air has designed, installed,
and serviced projects including computer rooms, environmental
chambers, manufacturing facilities, biotech laboratories, burn-in
rooms, and dry rooms.  Alpine Air was established in 1987.

Mechanical Technologies Corp. d/b/a Alpine Air, based in Reno,
Nevada, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
19-51146) on Sept. 26, 2019.  In the petition signed by John
Donovan, president, the Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to
$10 million in both assets and liabilities.  

The Honorable Bruce T. Beesley oversees the case.  Stephen R.
Harris, Esq., at Harris Law Practice LLC, serves as bankruptcy
counsel and Robison Sharp Sullivan & Brust, is special counsel.


MEDICAL SIMULATION: Gets OK to Hire SL Biggs as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------
Medical Simulation Corporation received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Colorado to employ SL Biggs as
its accountant.

The firm will provide professional tax and accounting services,
which include evaluating and assisting with resolving proofs of
claim from various authorities and preparing tax returns.

Mark Dennis, a certified public accountant, will be in charge of
the Debtor's account.

SL Biggs will be paid at these rates:

     Mark Dennis, CPA      $250 per hour
     Staff                 $125 per hour
     Senior Managers       $250 - $450 per hour
     Associates            $145 per hour

The firm received a retainer in the amount of $10,000.

As disclosed in court filings, SL Biggs is a "disinterested person"
as such term is defined under Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Mark D. Dennis, CPA
     SL Biggs, A Division of SingerLewak LLP
     2000 South Colorado Boulevard
     Tower II, Suite 200
     Denver, CO 80222
     Tel: (303) 694-6700
     Fax: (303) 694-6761

                  About Medical Simulation Corp.

Medical Simulation Corp., a manufacturer of medical equipment and
supplies, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 19-20101) on Nov. 22, 2019.  Thomas M.
Kim, director, signed the petition.  In the petition, the Debtor
estimated assets of between $10 million and $50 million and
liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million.

Judge Elizabeth E. Brown oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Shapiro Bieging Barber Otteson, LLP and Wadsworth
Garber Warner Conrardy, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtor's Chapter 11 case on Feb. 11, 2020.  The
committee is represented by Kutner Brinen, P.C.


MERITAGE HOMES: S&P Ups ICR to 'BB+' on Strong 2020 Performance
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
homebuilder Meritage Homes Corp. to 'BB+' from 'BB'. S&P also
raised its rating on the company's unsecured notes to 'BB+' from
'BB'. The '3' recovery rating is unchanged.

The stable outlook reflects its expectations that Meritage's
adjusted leverage will remain below 1.5x over the next 12 months.
S&P also expects debt to capital of 20%-25%.

The upgrade reflects Meritage's strong operating performance over
the past 12 months. Adjusted leverage declined to less than 1x as
of year-end 2020 from 1.6x as of year-end 2019, well below the 3x
upside threshold S&P had set for the 'BB' ratings. S&P said, "We
expect adjusted leverage (net of cash) to remain below 1.5x over
the next 12 months, with any increase in leverage coming from a
lower cash balance--the company's $745 million cash balance
year-end was more than double its typical year-end cash balance. We
do not expect Meritage to keep this much balance sheet cash in 2021
as it aggressively pursues community count growth."

Better economic conditions and Meritage's shift to more affordable
homes position the company to grow and to maintain a stronger
financial risk profile. Since 2016, Meritage has been transitioning
almost exclusively to the first-time and first-time move-up
segments of the housing market (the average sales price dropped to
$377,000 in 2020--down 3% from 2019). Entry-level composed almost
70% of total orders for the fourth quarter, up from 55% in
fourth-quarter 2019. Entry-level represented 67% of the average
active communities during the fourth quarter compared to 45% the
year before, indicating strong demand in this market segment. This
product is also typically built on less-expensive lots, can be
constructed more quickly than larger homes with more complicated
floor plans, and sells more quickly (the fourth-quarter absorption
pace of 5.3 homes per month per community improved 87% year over
year). This business model is less capital intense and should
enable Meritage to support organic growth without increasing gross
debt levels much above the approximately $1 billion reported as of
year-end 2020.

The strategic pivot to entry-level homes helps Meritage offset cost
inflation and maintain gross margins. The first-time and first-time
move-up communities typically have higher margins because of the
streamlining of the construction process and the increase in
speculative (spec) builds. As part of this strategy, management has
reduced the variety of its floor plans and design styles, which we
view as favorable because simplification enables the company to
better rationalize construction and lower average construction
time. This is particularly notable in the labor-challenged market.
It should help Meritage achieve operating efficiencies through a
higher proportion of spec builds and offset any margin degradation
from higher labor and material costs. This strategy is bearing
fruit: S&P's saw a 420-basis-point improvement in homebuilder gross
margins to 24% in the fourth quarter from 19.8% the prior year. The
margin reflects price increases achieved throughout the year, the
additional leveraging of fixed costs from higher closing volumes,
and operational efficiency. Because of the consistent purchasing
volumes on a limited number of stock keeping units, Meritage has
been able to negotiate lower pricing in bulk purchasing discounts
from its vendors. To date, the company has not experienced any
elongated cycle times from shortages in the labor pool. In
addition, Meritage mitigated lumber cost inflation with price
increases in 2020. Although lumber inflation retreated toward the
end of 2020 from highs earlier in the year, these costs remain
elevated as lumber prices have hit new records.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that
Meritage's adjusted debt to EBITDA will remain below 1.5x over the
next 12 months. We also expect debt to capital of 20%-25%. This
scenario contemplates a gradual economic recovery and sustained low
mortgage rates over the next 12 months. It also assumes Meritage
will expand its platform and emphasize entry-level product while
maintaining steady debt levels and gross margin at about 22%.

"We expect the company to maintain stronger credit ratios than
typically associated with the 'BB+' rating while the housing
industry remains relatively healthy and stable. Therefore:

"In a healthy market, we would lower our rating on Meritage if we
expected its debt to EBITDA to be sustained at more than 1.5x. This
could occur if the company adds at least $300 million or more in
debt in anticipation of further growth.

"In a weaker-than-expected housing market, we would expect the
cushion in credit ratios to deteriorate, and we would look to a 3x
debt-to-EBITDA threshold for a downgrade. The latter scenario could
occur if the U.S. experiences a prolonged recession such that
EBITDA declines to the $300 million area as gross margins decline
to below 16%, compared to our expectation of about 22%. We could
upgrade Meritage during the next year if the company expands its
platform such that overall market share significantly improves
without material diminution of its financial risk profile." This
could occur if:

-- Homebuilding revenue approaches $7 billion; and

-- EBITDA margin stays above 15%.


MIDTOWN CAMPUS: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until May 3
-----------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert A. Mark of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida, Miami Division extended the periods within
which Midtown Campus Properties, LLC has the exclusive right to
file a plan of reorganization from February 2, 2021, to and
including May 3, 2021, and to solicit acceptances of the plan from
April 5, 2021, to and including July 2, 2021.

The additional time will allow the Debtor to focus on obtaining
approval of the new DIP Loan, finalizing construction of the
Project, and developing a feasible Plan with its creditor body that
will allow it to emerge from bankruptcy.

The extensions granted are without prejudice to the Debtor's right
to request further extensions of the deadlines to file a plan
and/or solicit acceptances of a plan for cause shown, upon notice
and a hearing.

The Court shall retain jurisdiction over any and all matters
arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of
this Order.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/37q54aA at no extra charge.

                      About Midtown Campus Properties, LLC

Midtown Campus Properties, LLC, is a single asset real estate that
owns the Midtown Apartments.  The Midtown Apartments is a 310-unit
student housing apartment complex currently under construction at
104 NW 17th St in Gainesville Florida, just across from the
University of Florida.  It consists of a six-story main building, a
parking garage for resident and public use, and commercial retail
space.

Each unit includes a full-size kitchen, carpet, tile, and hardwood
floors and be fully furnished. It is located near several Midtown
bars and restaurants frequented by students, and just a couple of
minutes' walk from Ben Hill Griffin Stadium.

On May 8, 2020, Midtown Campus Properties sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-15173). The Debtor was
estimated to have $50 million to $100 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  

The Honorable Robert A. Mark is the presiding judge. The Debtor
tapped Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., as bankruptcy counsel;
and The Bosch Group, Inc., as construction consultants.

No creditors' committee has been appointed in this case. In
addition, no trustee or examiner has been appointed.


MKJC AUTO: Auction of Substantially All Assets Set for March 26
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jil Mazer-Marino of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York authorized MKJC Auto Group, LLC's bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all of its
tangible and intangible assets, to World Imports, LLC for $2
million, on the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
December 2020, subject to overbid.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: March 18, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. (EST)

     b. Initial Bid: $2,075,000

     c. Deposit: 5% of the cash consideration of such Bidder's bid,
not to exceed $125,000, made payable to the Debtor and to be held
in an escrow account at Shafferman & Feldman LLP

     d. Auction: In the event at least one Qualified Bid for the
Purchased Assets in addition to the Stalking Horse Bid is received
by the Debtor, the Debtor will conduct an Auction for the Purchased
Assets on March 26, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (EST).  The Auction will be
held at the offices of the Debtor's special counsel, Paul Solda,
Esq., at 60 East 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, 10165 or such
other location designated by the Debtor prior to the scheduled
auction.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

     f. Sale Hearing: April 7, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. (EST)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline:  April 1, 2021, at 5:00 p.m.
(EST)

     h. Bid Protection: $50,000

Any sale of Purchased Assets will be on an "as is, where is" basis
and without representations or warranties of any kind, nature or
description, free and clear of all Claims, with such Claims to
attach to the proceeds of the sale.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures Order is available at
https://tinyurl.com/ys63gzbs from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About MKJC Auto Group, LLC

MKJC Auto Group, LLC owns and operates the automobile dealership
out of Long Island, New York, known as Hyundai of Long Island
City,
selling and leasing new and pre-owned Hyundai automobiles to
consumers.

MKJC Auto Group, LLC, filed its voluntary petition for relief
under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
20-42283) on June 8, 2020. The petition was signed by Ryan
Kaminsky, Executor of The Estate of Mitchell Kaminsky. At the time
of filing, the Debtor estimated $10,319,999 in assets and
$10,034,320 in liabilities.

The Honorable Carla E. Craig is the presiding judge. Joel M.
Shafferman, Esq. at SHAFFERMAN & FELDMAN LLP represents the Debtor
as counsel.  The Debtor has hired the Law Offices of Paul J.
Solda,
Esq. as its special corporate and real estate counsel.



MKJC AUTO: World Imports Buying Assets for $2M, Subject to Overbid
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jil Mazer-Marino of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York authorized MKJC Auto Group, LLC's bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all of its
tangible and intangible assets to World Imports, LLC, for $2
million, on the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
December 2020, subject to overbid.

The Sale Motion, to the extent it seeks to establish Bidding
Procedures with respect to a proposed sale of the Purchased Assets
and procedures for the assumption and assignment of the Assumed
Contracts, is granted as set forth in the Order.  All of the
Objections, to the extent not addressed herein, are overruled.

The Debtor is authorized to solicit bids for the sale of the
Purchased Assets and to conduct, in the event qualified bids are
received, an auction in accordance with the Bidding Procedures,
which reflect, among other things, the procedure for selling the
Purchased Assets for the purpose of entertaining qualified
competing bids and selecting the highest or otherwise best offer
for the Purchased Assets, pursuant to that certain Asset Purchase
Agreement by and between the Debtor and Major World.

The Debtor is authorized to take any and all actions necessary and
appropriate to implement the Bidding Procedures and is authorized
to designate Shafferman & Feldman LLP, the counsel for the Debtor,
as the Escrow Agent as further described in the Bidding
Procedures.

Notwithstanding any other provision of the Order, or any provision
of the Sales Procedure Notice, or any provision of any Proposed
Asset Purchase Agreement or any provision of the Asset Purchase
Agreement, the terms and conditions set forth in Section 5 of the
Bidding Procedures will apply with respect to any proposed sale or
assignment of the Debtor's Hyundai franchise.

The terms and conditions of Section 5 of the Bidding Procedures
will govern any proposed assumption and assignment of the Dealer
Agreement, and the Manufacturer will have at least seven business
days before any hearing to file any objection or response to any
proposed assumption and assignment of the Dealer Agreement.

The Sale Procedures Notice is approved in all respects.

The Notice of Assumption and Assignment of Executory Contracts and
Unexpired Leases in Connection with Proposed Sale of Certain Assets
of the Debtor, is also approved.  The Debtor shall, within five
business days of the entry of the Sale Procedures Order, serve the
Cure Notice upon each non-Debtor counterparty to each Executory
Contract or Unexpired Lease to which the Debtor is a party that may
be assumed and assigned to the Stalking Horse Bidder.  The Cure
Objection Deadline is 20 days after service of the Cure Notice or
Supplemental Cure Notice.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: March 18, 2021, at 4:00 p.m. (EST)

     b. Initial Bid: $2,075,000

     c. Deposit: 5% of the cash consideration of such Bidder's bid,
not to exceed $125,000, made payable to the Debtor and to be held
in an escrow account at Shafferman & Feldman LLP

     d. Auction: In the event at least one Qualified Bid for the
Purchased Assets in addition to the Stalking Horse Bid is received
by the Debtor, the Debtor will conduct an Auction for the Purchased
Assets on March 26, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. (EST).  The Auction will be
held at the offices of the Debtor's special counsel, Paul Solda,
Esq., at 60 East 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, 10165 or such
other location designated by the Debtor prior to the scheduled
auction.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

     f. Sale Hearing: April 7, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. (EST)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: April 1, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. (EST)

     h. Bid Protection: $50,000

The counsel for the Debtor will serve a copy of the Order and the
Sale Procedures Notice, on Feb. 17, 2021.  The Debtor will cause a
copy of the Sale Procedures Notice to be published one time in an
automotive trade journal no later than Feb. 18, 2021.

Any sale of Purchased Assets will be on an "as is, where is" basis
and without representations or warranties of any kind, nature or
description, free and clear of all Claims, with such Claims to
attach to the proceeds of the sale.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures Order is available at
https://tinyurl.com/w3xr4hsy from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About MKJC Auto Group, LLC

MKJC Auto Group, LLC owns and operates the automobile dealership
out of Long Island, New York, known as Hyundai of Long Island
City,
selling and leasing new and pre-owned Hyundai automobiles to
consumers.

MKJC Auto Group, LLC, filed its voluntary petition for relief
under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
20-42283) on June 8, 2020. The petition was signed by Ryan
Kaminsky, Executor of The Estate of Mitchell Kaminsky. At the time
of filing, the Debtor estimated $10,319,999 in assets and
$10,034,320 in liabilities.

The Honorable Carla E. Craig is the presiding judge. Joel M.
Shafferman, Esq. at SHAFFERMAN & FELDMAN LLP represents the Debtor
as counsel.  The Debtor has hired the Law Offices of Paul J.
Solda,
Esq. as its special corporate and real estate counsel.



MOHEGAN TRIBAL GAMING: S&P Raises 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on casino
operator Mohegan Tribal Finance Authority (MTFA) to 'B-' from
'CCC+', raising the rating on MTGA's senior unsecured notes to
'CCC+' from 'CCC', and removing the ratings from CreditWatch, where
they were placed with positive implications on Jan. 13, 2021.

At the same time, S&P is raising its issuer credit rating on MTFA
to 'B-' from 'CCC+'.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that MTGA
and MTFA will maintain adequate liquidity through at least 2021 and
that MTGA will maintain healthy EBITDA coverage of interest of
about 2x, excluding project financing related to Inspire Korea. We
believe MTGA will generate sufficient operating cash flow to fund
maintenance-related capital expenditures (capex), distributions to
the tribe, and modest debt repayment."

The upgrade reflects MTGA's improved maturity profile, as the
recent refinancing eliminated near-term refinancing risk and
increased liquidity. MTGA recently refinanced its senior secured
credit facility with $1.175 billion of new senior secured notes due
2026, and a new $263 million revolving credit facility due 2023.
The refinancing eliminated near-term refinancing risk and improved
MTGA's liquidity, including cash and revolver availability.

S&P said, "As such, we are revising MTGA's liquidity assessment to
adequate from less than adequate because MTGA has refinanced its
sizable debt maturities that were due in October 2021. Pro forma
for the transaction, we estimate MTGA had an unrestricted cash
balance and revolver availability of approximately $260 million
(pro forma for the refinancing transactions) as of Dec. 31, 2020.
This does not include about $29 million of restricted cash at
Inspire Korea, which is not available to fund debt service or
operating expenses in the U.S. Furthermore, aside from the new
revolver's maturity in April 2023, MTGA will have relatively modest
debt maturities until October 2024, when its $500 million unsecured
notes mature.

"Although we expect Inspire Korea will weaken MTGA's consolidated
leverage in 2021, we believe its liquidity, the debt service
reserves in the project financing, and its interest coverage
support a 'B-' rating. We believe Inspire Korea is a key component
of MTGA's expansion and diversification strategy and view its full
ownership of the project, as well as its past willingness to incur
incremental debt to support it and increase its stake, as
demonstrating Inspire Korea's strategic importance. MTGA plans to
secure project financing for Inspire Korea over the near term and
we expect these debt agreements to include debt service reserve
provisions to support MTGA's liquidity through the project's
opening and for at least a reasonable ramp-up period, which will
reduce the risk to MTGA's cash flow and liquidity over the next
several years. Additionally, MTGA's partnership agreement with
Hanwha Group, a Korean conglomerate with both an engineering and
construction division and a hotels and resorts division, includes a
general contractor construction agreement, a completion guarantee,
and up to $100 million investment in the project from Hanwha.
Despite its long-term strategic importance, MTGA will be limited in
its capacity to provide additional support to Inspire Korea if
needed because MTGA will not be able to guarantee Inspire Korea's
debt beyond the $150 million guarantee allowed under the revolver.

"We forecast MTGA's consolidated lease-adjusted net leverage will
remain above 13x in 2021 largely due to incremental debt to fund
Inspire Korea-related capital expenditures and partly because of
weaker-than-normal visitation until the COVID-19 vaccines are
widely distributed, which we believe could occur by the end of the
third quarter (MTGA's fiscal year-end). Our measure of leverage
includes the cash flow and related debt of all of its subsidiaries,
including the subsidiaries that own the operations of the Niagara
properties and the Korea project. Excluding the project financing
and capital expenditures related to Inspire Korea, we forecast
MTGA's lease-adjusted leverage will be around 9x and expect EBITDA
interest coverage of about 2x in 2021 with no material debt
maturities. Our estimate incorporates our expectation that MTGA's
EBITDA will increase over the next several quarters due to a modest
improvement in its EBITDA margin relative to 2019 stemming from
cost cuts implemented over the past few months, particularly
related to its labor and marketing expenses. Additionally, we
expect many of MTGA's lower-margin or loss-leading amenities, such
as buffets, to remain closed for some time to comply with health
and safety measures intended to limit the spread of the
coronavirus, which will further support an improvement in its
margin.

"The upgrade of MTFA to 'B-' reflects reduced liquidity risk, given
MTFA's reliance on MTGA for its cash flows and for debt service and
MTGA's improved liquidity. Despite our expectation for MTGA's
consolidated leverage to remain weak in 2021 as a result of MTGA's
development project in Korea, we believe it has adequate liquidity
to pay base rent expense to MTFA. Furthermore, despite property
closures in 2020 and weaker hotel operating results upon reopening,
MTGA continued to pay rent to MTFA. MTFA relies on this base rent
payment in order to service its outstanding bonds.

MTFA leases the Earth Hotel Tower at Mohegan Sun Connecticut to
MTGA. The lease agreement is structured in such a way that base
rent payments from MTGA fully cover MTFA's debt service and its
minimal operating expenses without additional cushion. MTFA
maintains minimal cash on the balance sheet given that it is a
pass-through entity. Additionally, in the event that rent payments
from MTGA are insufficient to cover MTFA's debt service, the tribe
has pledged the hotel occupancy tax revenue it receives from
Mohegan Sun as an additional source of liquidity. Hotel occupancy
tax revenue is lower than normal because hotel occupancy is lower
as a result of the pandemic. Thus, the pledge of this tax revenue
provides minimal additional cash flow cushion. However, we believe
the most likely scenario under which MTGA would not make the full
rent payment would be one in which Mohegan Sun is experiencing
significantly weaker operating performance and faces liquidity
challenges. We believe this scenario is less likely now that the
property is open and MTGA has completed its refinancing transaction
but could occur if recovery is much slower than we currently
expect.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that MTGA and MTFA
will maintain adequate liquidity through at least 2021 and that the
ongoing operating recovery will support healthy EBITDA coverage of
interest of about 2x at MTGA, excluding project financing related
to Inspire Korea. We believe MTGA will generate sufficient
operating cash flow to fund maintenance-related capex,
distributions to the tribe, and modest debt repayment.

"We could lower ratings if MTGA underperformed our EBITDA
expectations such that adjusted EBITDA coverage of interest fell
toward 1.5x or if MTGA sustained negative discretionary cash flow
(excluding project-related spending at Inspire Korea) as this could
lead MTGA to begin to deplete excess cash balances and revolver
availability. We could lower ratings on MTFA if we lose confidence
MTGA would not continue making its lease payments.

"We are unlikely to raise the ratings prior to the opening of
Inspire Korea given our forecast for credit measures to weaken
significantly from incremental debt and capex related to the
project. Nevertheless, we could consider raising the rating one
notch if we believed interest coverage would stay above 2x and
discretionary cash flow generation remained positive. We are
unlikely to raise MTFA's ratings because we expect base rent
payments to just meet debt service costs, and we expect EBITDA
coverage of fixed charges to remain at about 1x."


MOREAUX TRANSPORTATION: Seeks Approval to Hire Financial Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moreaux Transportation Services, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana to employ
Meggen Rhodes of Stout Risius Ross, LLC as its financial advisor.

Ms. Rhodes' services include:

     (a) assistance with record keeping and preparation of
financial statements;

     (b) review of financial information;

     (c) preparation of filings required by the bankruptcy court,
the Office of the U.S. Trustee and the Subchapter V trustee,
including, but not limited to, schedules of assets and liabilities,
statements of financial affairs and monthly operating reports;

     (d) financial advisory services including the preparation of a
liquidation analysis and a monthly analysis of financial
information;

     (e) assistance with the preparation of the proposed business
plan and financial projections;

     (f) assistance with the preparation or review of documents
necessary for Chapter 11 plan confirmation;

     (g) assistance with claims resolution procedures, including,
but not limited to, analyses of creditors' claims by type and
entity; and

      (h) other financial advisory services.

The Debtor has agreed to pay the financial advisor an hourly fee of
$250 for her services.

Ms. Rhodes disclosed in a court filing that she neither holds nor
represents any adverse interest to the Debtor or its estate.

Ms. Rhodes can reached at:

     Meggen Rhodes
     Stout Risius Ross, LLC
     1000 Main Street, Suite 3200
     Houston, TX 77002
     Phone: 713-225-9580
     Fax: 713-225-9588
     Email: mrhodes@stout.com

              About Moreaux Transportation Services

Moreaux Transportation Services, Inc., a trucking company in Texas,
filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 20-20384) on Sept. 21,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Bradley Drell, Esq., of Gold Weems Bruser Sues & Rundell, and
Meggen Rhodes of Stout Risius Ross, LLC serve as the Debtor's legal
counsel and financial advisor, respectively.


MTE HOLDINGS: Seeks to Extend Plan Exclusivity Until March 22
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors MTE Holdings LLC and its affiliates request the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to extend the
exclusive periods during which the Debtors may file a plan or plans
and solicit acceptances until March 22, 2021, and May 21, 2021,
respectively. This is the Debtors' sixth request to extend their
Exclusive Periods.

The Debtors are now in the final stages of the bankruptcy emergence
process. After scheduling the Auction for the sale of substantially
all of the Debtors' assets for January 29, 2021, the Debtors
continued to receive investor interest up-to and beyond the bid
deadline of January 15, 2021, due to the encouragement of the
Debtors and their professionals. On January 27, 2021, Natixis, New
York Branch and BMO Harris Bank N.A. submitted a credit bid for the
Debtors' assets. As a result of the Credit Bid and the ongoing
efforts of the Debtors to negotiate with all the interested
parties, it became apparent that the Auction would need to be
rescheduled.

Therefore, with the consent of Natixis and BMO, and after
consulting Riverstone Credit Management, LLC and the Ad Hoc
Committee of Service Providers, the Debtors adjourned the Auction
to February 5, 2021. During the intervening week, the Debtors
continued their negotiations with several interested parties. These
negotiations yielded additional firm bids. In addition, two parties
provided the Debtors with term sheets for a proposed plan of
reorganization. Once again, on February 4, 2021, the Debtors
determined that an adjournment of the Auction to February 16, 2021,
was in the best interest of all parties in interest.

Concurrently with undertaking the plan process, the Debtors
negotiated an updated budget, extending their use of cash
collateral through April 2, 2021, and updated milestones. In
general, the updated milestones provide for the following emergence
process deadlines:

i. February 16, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. (EST): Commencement of Auction;
ii. February 22, 2021: Announcement of Winning Bidder(s) and
Back-Up Bidder(s);
iii. March 1, 2021: The Debtors must either (a) file a plan of
reorganization and related disclosure statement or (b) obtain court
approval of the sale of substantially all of their assets. The
updated budget and milestones were filed with the Court
concurrently with the filing of this Motion; and
iv. April 5, 2021: unless the Court has already approved the sale
of substantially all of the Debtors' assets, the Debtors shall
obtain Court approval of their Disclosure Statement and shall
obtain the earliest available confirmation hearing date based on
the Court's schedule for confirmation of an acceptable plan.

In connection with the Revised Milestones, the Debtors require an
additional extension of the Exclusive Periods to preserve the
Debtors' exclusive right to complete their ongoing processes to
finalize a stand-alone reorganization plan or, in the alternative,
to sell substantially all of their assets. This proposed extension
will benefit the Debtors' estates, as upending the Debtors' control
of their exit strategy now risks jeopardizing the last six months
of efforts of all parties in interest.

To date, the Debtors have received (i) five bids that either
constitutes Qualified Bids or are close to being qualified under
the Bid Procedures Order and (ii) two separate plan proposals.
Three of the proposed bidders have submitted Good Faith Deposits to
fulfill one of the conditions for participating in the Auction.
Others are actively working with the Debtors to negotiate the final
form of their respective asset purchase agreements.

In addition, the Debtors, Natixis, and those statutory lienholders
that have filed adversary proceedings asserting the priority of
their lien claims over Natixis' security interest continue to
participate in mediation overseen by the Honorable Steven A.
Felsenthal (retired) as Mediator to resolve pending disputes
regarding the validity, priority, and/or extent of certain priority
statutory liens. These negotiations are critical to resolving the
claims of the Priority Lienholders and to achieving the Debtors'
goal of a consensual exit from the Chapter 11 Cases.

Even with the rise in oil prices providing stability to the
Debtors' operations, time is of the essence to emerge from
bankruptcy. Given the previously limited time periods for extension
of exclusivity, another is necessary to ensure proper time to
develop the plan construct.

With the Debtors' clear progress towards developing a viable exit
from the Chapter 11 Cases through their work on the sale process,
the Debtors submit that cause exists to extend the Exclusive
Periods. The Debtors are hopeful that, with the cooperation of
their key creditor constituencies, the additional time requested
will result in a confirmable plan of reorganization and allow the
Debtors to exit these Chapter 11 Cases.

A copy of the Debtors' Motion to extend is available from
stretto.com at https://bit.ly/2Ne0k0A at no extra charge.

                               About MTE Holdings

MTE Holdings LLC is a privately held company in the oil and gas
extraction business. MTE sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 19-12269) on October 22,
2019. In the petition signed by its authorized representative, Mark
A. Siffin, the Debtor disclosed assets of less than $50 billion and
debts of $500 million.

Previously, Judge Karen B. Owens has been assigned to the case.
Now, Judge Christopher S. Sontchi oversees the case. The Debtor
tapped Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP as its bankruptcy counsel;
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP as its local counsel;
Greenhill & Co., LLC, as financial advisor and investment banker;
Ankura Consulting LLC, as a chief restructuring officer; and
Stretto as its claims and noticing agent.


NANCY LOUISE HORTON: Winchester Property Sale Voluntarily Dismissed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy Louise Horton filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Virginia a notice that her proposed sale of the
real property known as 908-910 Cedar Creek Grade, in Winchester,
Virginia, 22601, Tax Map Number 249-01-1 for the City of
Winchester, to Randall L. Mitchell for $1.1 million filed on Jan.
17, 2021, is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice.

Nancy Louise Horton sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Va.
Case No. 20-50646) on Aug. 28, 2020.  The Debtor tapped David Cox,
Esq., at Cox Law Group, PLLC as counsel.



NAVIENT SOLUTIONS: Asks Court to Dismiss 'Unsupported' Ch.11 Filing
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that student loan servicer Navient Solutions has
asked a New York bankruptcy court to stop an attempt by a trio of
student loan borrowers to send it into Chapter 11, saying the
claims it is facing insolvency are "unsupported and defamatory.

"In a filing Wednesday, Feb. 17, 2021, Navient said the borrowers'
petition provides no proof the company is insolvent or that their
claims against it are legitimate, and that it is an attempt to
damage the company's reputation and influence litigation filed
against it by the borrowers' counsel.  "The involuntary case and
accompanying papers are replete with unsupported and defamatory
accusations," said Navient.

                   About Navient Solutions

Navient Solutions is the servicing unit of student loan giant
Navient Corp. (Nasdaq:NAVI).  Navient Solutions is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Navient Corp. and acts as the principal management
company for most of Navient's business activities.  Navient
Solutions' servicing division manages and operates the loan
servicing functions for Navient and its affiliates.

According to PacerMonitor.com, Sarah Bannister, Brandon Hood, and
LaBarron Tate have filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition
against
Navient Solutions, LLC (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 21-10249) on Feb.
8, 2021, saying they were owed a combined $45,684 in
"overpayments"
that they say the servicer illegally collected.

The Petitioners reportedly had their private student debts
discharged in bankruptcy but have been hounded and lied to for more
than a decade to repay discharged debts.

The Petitioners' counsel:

       Austin C. Smith, Esq.
       Smith Law Group LLP
       95 Cove Hollow Rd
       East Hampton, NY 11937
       E-mail: acsmithlawgroup.com
               aconnellsmith@gmail.com


NEOPHARMA INC: Trustee Hires Polsinelli PC as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Gary Murphey, the Chapter 11 trustee for Neopharma, Inc. and
Neopharma Tennessee LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to employ Polsinelli PC
as his legal counsel.

The firm's services include:

     a. advising the trustee regarding his powers and duties and
the continued operation of the Debtors' business;

     b. taking all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
estates of the Debtors, including the prosecution of actions on the
Debtors' behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against the
Debtors, the negotiation of disputes in which the Debtors are
involved, and the preparation of objections to claims filed against
the estates;


     c. preparing legal papers;

     d. appearing in court;

     e. assisting with any disposition of the Debtors' assets by
sale or otherwise;

     f. taking all necessary actions in connection with any plan of
liquidation or reorganization;

     g. reviewing all pleadings filed in the Debtors' Chapter 11
cases; and  

     h. other legal services.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Shareholders         $380 - $925 per hour
     Associates           $290 - $560 per hour
     Paraprofessionals    $165 - $375 per hour

David Gordon, Esq., shareholder of Polsinelli, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     David E. Gordon, Esq.
     Polsinelli PC
     401 Commerce Street, Suite 900
     Nashville, TN 37219
     Phone: 615-259-1510
     Fax: 615-259-1573

                      About Neopharma Inc.

Neopharma Inc. and Neopharma Tennessee, LLC, manufacturers of
pharmaceutical and medicinal products, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Lead Case No.
20-52015) on Dec. 22, 2020.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between
$1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Shelley D. Rucker oversees the cases.

Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP and Province LLC serve as the Debtors'
legal counsel and financial advisor, respectively.

On Jan. 14, 2021, the U.S. Trustee for Region 8 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee tapped
Buchalter P.C. as its lead bankruptcy counsel, Woolf McClane Bright
Allen & Carpenter PLLC as Tennessee counsel, and Province LLC as
financial advisor.

Gary M. Murphey is the Debtors' Chapter 11 trustee.  He is
represented by Polsinelli PC.


NEOPHARMA INC: Trustee Hires Resurgence Financial as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Murphey, the Chapter 11 trustee for Neopharma, Inc. and
Neopharma Tennessee LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to hire Resurgence
Financial Services as his accountant.

The firm will provide tax, accounting and bookkeeping services.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Senior Manager  $250 - $350 per hour
     Staff            $90 - $200 per hour

Gary Murphey of Resurgence Financial Services disclosed in court
filings that his firm neither holds nor represents any interest
adverse to the Debtor's bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached at:

     Gary Murphey
     Resurgence Financial Services, LLC
     3330 Cumberland Blvd., Suite 500
     Atlanta, GA 30339
     Phone: (770) 933-6855

                      About Neopharma Inc.

Neopharma Inc. and Neopharma Tennessee, LLC, manufacturers of
pharmaceutical and medicinal products, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Lead Case No.
20-52015) on Dec. 22, 2020.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between
$1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Shelley D. Rucker oversees the cases.

Hunter, Smith & Davis, LLP and Province LLC serve as the Debtors'
legal counsel and financial advisor, respectively.

On Jan. 14, 2021, the U.S. Trustee for Region 8 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee tapped
Buchalter P.C. as its lead bankruptcy counsel, Woolf McClane Bright
Allen & Carpenter PLLC as Tennessee counsel, and Province LLC as
financial advisor.

Gary M. Murphey is the Debtors' Chapter 11 trustee.  He is
represented by Polsinelli PC.


NEUROCARE CENTER: Cash Collateral Use Until Mar. 17 OK'd
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Russ Kendig of the U.S. Bankrutpcy Court for the Northern
District of Ohio, Eastern Division, authorized Neurocare Center,
Inc. to use cash collateral until March 17, 2021.

Before the Debtor's Chapter 11 case was filed, Key Bank made loans
and advances to the Debtor under promissory notes and security
agreements which were executed on January 15, 2016, and November
25, 2019, under which the Debtor borrowed approximately $500,000
and $200,000, respectively.  On the Petition Date, the current
balances on the Key Debt were $494,942.06 and $157,323.14,
respectively.  Key Bank holds a first priority security interest in
all of the Debtor's assets with the exception of certain
pharmaceutical products sold by ADS Specialty Healthcare in which
Key holds a second priority security interest.

ADS Specialty Healthcare sells pharmaceutical goods to the Debtor
under a prepetition agreement, security agreement, and UCC filings,
on credit terms secured by a first priority purchase money security
interest in the goods sold and a second priority security interest
in the remainder of the Debtor's assets.

Judge Kendig found that "the Debtor has demonstrated adequate
protection for the Debtor's use of Cash Collateral by granting a
replacement lien on the Debtor's post-petition assets, including,
but not limited to, raw materials, work-in-process, inventory,
accounts receivable, and cash, and continuing payments to the
Lenders pursuant to the terms of their respective prepetition
agreements in the amounts of $1,385.00 and $374.85 to Key, plus any
administrative fees, including an administrative fee of $1,250.00
currently due and owing on the $500,000 promissory note with Key,
and the amounts invoiced by ADS to the Debtor from time to time."

Judge Kending added that "the Debtor has stated that it desires to
pursue a financial restructuring in cooperation with the Lenders
and that the Debtor believes that the best method to effectuate
such a financial restructuring is by means of a chapter 11 case for
the Debtor.  Based upon the record presented to the Court by the
Debtor, the relief requested in the Motion is necessary, essential,
and appropriate for the continued operation of the Debtor's
business and the management and preservation of the Debtor's assets
and properties and is in the best interests of the Debtor, its
estate, and creditors."

Further requests for the additional use of Cash Collateral as may
be made by the Debtor, if any, will be heard telephonically at 2
p.m. on March 16, 2021.  Objections are to be filed no later than
March 12, 2021 at 4 p.m.

KeyBank National Association is represented by:

          Chrysanthe E. Vassiles, Esq.
          BLACK, MCCUSKEY, SOUERS & ARBAUGH, LPA
          220 Market Ave., South, Suite 1000
          Canton, OH 44702
          Telephone: 330-456-8341
          Email: cvassiles@bmsa.com

                    About Neurocare Center Inc.

Founded in 1995, Neurocare Center Inc. --
http://www.neurocarecenter.com-- provides health care services to
patients with neurological, rehabilitative and sleep disorders.

Neurocare Center filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No.
21-60030) on Jan. 12, 2021.  Neurocare Center President Andrew
Stalker MD signed the petition.

At the time of filing, the Debtor disclosed $597,245 in assets and
$2,128,274 in liabilities.

Judge Russ Kendig oversees the case.  Anthony J. DeGirolamo,
Attorney at Law serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


NEWELL BRANDS: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'BB+' LTR
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on U.S.-based consumer goods
company Newell Brands Inc. to stable from negative and affirmed all
its ratings, including its 'BB+' long-term and 'B' short-term
ratings on the company.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Newell will
continue to improve its financial metrics through its business
simplification initiatives and reduce leverage to 4x or below in
the next 12 months as it continues to contractually repay debt.

Newell's product offering benefited from pandemic-related consumer
shifts leading to better than previously expected financial
metrics. S&P previously forecasted that Newell would be negatively
affected by the pandemic-related lockdowns and ongoing economic
recession due to the discretionary nature of its products. Although
the company's results reflected these constraints primarily during
the initial months, its core sales for the year were down only 1.1%
(reported sales down 3.4%). This compares with our previous
expectation of double-digit declines. Newell began to see benefits
as the duration of the pandemic and lockdowns influenced consumers'
buying behaviors and consumers shifted spending toward home-related
products from travel and dining. Newell directly benefited from
this shift resulting in fourth quarter year-over-year core sales
growth of 4.2% in its appliance and cookware segment and 12.4% in
home solutions segment. Newell's commercial business, which offers
cleaning solutions, also benefited steadily throughout the year and
posted fourth-quarter core sales growth of 13.8%. Its outdoor and
recreation segment is still in decline but improving from negative
20% in the early stages of the pandemic to now high-single-digit
declines.

Its learning and development segment, which is its largest and most
profitable segment and includes its writing business, has been
negatively affected by the continued remote working and
homeschooling trends. Learning and development was down 2.2% in the
fourth quarter as a result of an increase in baby product sales
after facing double-digit declines in the onset of the pandemic.
S&P believes this segment will be a driver of growth in fiscal 2021
as vaccines continue to be deployed and consumers return to work
and school in the second half of the year.

S&P said, "We forecast low-single-digit revenue growth, reflecting
a more focused portfolio as pandemic buying behavior pivots to
away-from-home purchases in combination with the ongoing recession.
Overall, we do not expect the company to sustain the aforementioned
2020 mid-single-digit growth as consumers return to more normalized
buying behavior. For example, we believe the company will not post
growth in segments such as appliances because some sales were
likely pulled forward and the replacement cycle for these products
is longer than a year. Even if the economy grows against an easy
2020 comparable, we believe it will remain in a fragile state and
exposed to inflation risk. The company has made changes to its
operating segment leadership and continues to focus on its product
offering which we believe could stem historical revenue declines.
The company's business simplification initiative has reduced SKU
counts and focused on the company's product offering, which we
believe better positions the portfolio as the economic recession
persists.

"We expect leverage to be 4x or below over the next 12 months. We
estimate Newell ended fiscal 2020 with adjusted leverage near 4x,
after peaking at 5x for the trailing-12-months ended June 2020,
which included the highest level of pandemic restrictions and
uncertainty. The improvement reflects EBITDA margin strengthening
of 70 basis points year over year. Additionally, the company
reduced debt by about $100 million by using the net proceeds from
the issuance of 4.875% $500 million notes due 2025 and cash on hand
to repay its 4.7% $305 million senior notes due 2020 and $300
million of its 3.85% notes due 2023. Newell has also tendered for
its 3.15% $93.8 million notes to be repaid in March 2021 (rating
will be discontinued upon redemption). We believe the company will
continue to repay debt as it becomes due as it strives toward its
management-stated leverage target of 3x. The company has $351.6
million of 3.75% euro notes maturing in October 2021 which we
expect to be repaid as the company ended the year with $1 billion
of cash. Its largest upcoming maturity wall is the remaining 3.85%
$1 billion notes in April 2023 which we forecast will be redeemed
with an equal-size new issuance.

"Although leverage will likely be below 4x in fiscal 2021, we
believe there is risk to the company's ability to sustain leverage
at these levels given the uncertainty in the macro-environment,
including the fragile and uneven economy, inflation, and shifting
consumer-buying behavior.

"The outcome of the SEC investigation is uncertain but we expect
the company will be able to manage any potential financial impact.
Newell is subject to a subpoena from the SEC related to its sales
practices and accounting going back to January 2016, and we are
uncertain if any potential findings would require the company to
pay penalties. However, we believe the cash outlays for potential
penalties will be manageable. We note that annual internal controls
will be tested with its 2020 annual filing.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation for the company to
improve its operating performance over the next 12 months through
its business simplification initiatives and by repaying contractual
debt maturities. We expect leverage to be 4x or below over the next
12 months."

S&P could raise its ratings on Newell if it:

-- Continues to strengthen its profitability by increasing its
sales, and its margins benefit from further cost-savings
initiatives and management's business simplification efforts.

-- Improves its debt leverage toward the mid-3x area.

-- Consistently demonstrates a financial policy with respect to
acquisitions and shareholder returns such that we believe it will
sustain its leverage in the mid-3x.

S&P could lower its ratings on Newell if:

-- Leverage is above 4.25x.

-- It faces top-line or margin challenges, potentially stemming
from increased competition in the industry, prolonged economic
weakness that reduces consumer spending, or higher-than-expected
commodity or tariff pressures that it cannot offset with price
increases or productivity improvements.

-- It prioritizes shareholder returns ahead of paying down debt,
leading its leverage at or above our downgrade trigger.


NORTHERN HOLDINGS: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until June 25
----------------------------------------------------------
At the behest of Debtor Northern Holdings, LLC, Judge Mark S.
Wallace of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California, Santa Ana Division, extended the period in which the
Debtor may file a chapter 11 plan from February 25, 2021, through
and including June 25, 2021, and to solicit acceptances for a plan
from April 26, 2021, through and including September 23, 2021.

A hearing took place at Courtroom 6C, 411 West Fourth Street, Santa
Anna, CA 92701 on February 8, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., to consider the
Debtor's motion of exclusivity periods extension. The Court having
considered the Motion, the Objection filed by secured creditor Farm
Credit West, FLCA, the Debtor's Reply thereto and the declarations
submitted in support thereof; and good cause appearing therefore
granted the Debtor's request of exclusivity extensions.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2ZsWKT1 at no extra charge.

                         About Northern Holdings LLC

Northern Holdings, LLC is a Minnesota LLC created on April 30,
2012, for the purpose of acquiring and restructuring a wine
importer and distribution company in St. Paul, Minn.

Northern Holdings, LLC filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
20-13014) on October 28, 2020, to stop a foreclosure sale of its
real properties by lienholder Farm Credit and so that it can
reorganize its financial affairs. In the petition signed by Leroy
Codding, managing member, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50
million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Mark S. Wallace oversees the case. Matthew D, Resnik, Esq.,
at Resnik Hayes Moradi, LLP, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


NPC INT'L: Asks Court to Extend Plan Exclusivity Until June 26
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors NPC International Inc. and its affiliates request the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division to extend the exclusive periods during which the Debtors
may file a Chapter 11 plan from February 26, 2021, to June 26,
2021, and obtain acceptances for the plan from April 27, 2021, to
August 25, 2021.

These chapter 11 cases have been significantly consensual to date
and all that remains is for the Debtors to continue to work
productively with their key stakeholders as they move toward the
sale closing and emergence from these chapter 11 cases. Under the
respective Purchase Agreements, the Closing Date(s) may not occur
prior to March 24, 2021, or after May 14, 2021, meaning that the
earliest the Debtors could close the Sale Transaction would still
be after the Exclusive Filing Period terminates. To facilitate
these efforts, the Debtors seek—largely as a precautionary
measure—a 120-day extension of their Exclusive Periods to permit
consummation of the Plan.

Prior to filing this Motion, the Debtors shared a copy with counsel
for the Creditors' Committee and the Ad Hoc Priority/1L Group, and
each of these constituents supports the requested extension of the
Exclusive Periods. No trustee or examiner has been appointed in
these chapter 11 cases.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have paid their undisputed
post-petition debts in the ordinary course of business or as
otherwise provided by court order. The Debtors request an extension
of the Exclusive Periods not to pressure creditors, but to provide
a sufficient, flexible window in which the Debtors can implement
the Sale Transaction and other transactions contemplated by the
confirmed Plan, without the disruption and distraction created by
competing plan proposals.

A copy of the Debtors' Motion to extend is available from
epiq11.com at https://bit.ly/3jXNako at no extra charge.

                            About NPC International

NPC International, Inc., is the largest franchisee of both Pizza
Hut and Wendy's as well as the second-largest restaurant franchisee
overall in the U.S., operating over 1,300 restaurants in 30 states
and the district of Columbia. The Company, which is headquartered
in Leawood, Kansas, and has a shared services center located in
Pittsburg, Kansas, generates $1.5 billion in sales and has more
than 30,000 full and part-time employees.

NPC International and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
20-33353) on July 1, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors
disclosed assets of between $1 billion and $10 billion and
liabilities of the same range.  

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases. The Debtors tapped Weil,
Gotshal & Manges, LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; Alixpartners, LLP as
financial advisor; Greenhill & Co., LLC as investment banker; and
Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC as claims, noticing, and
solicitation agent and administrative advisor.


ONE AVIATION: Committee Bid for Chapter 7 Approved
--------------------------------------------------
Alex Wolf of Bloomberg Law reports that a bankruptcy judge ordered
ONE Aviation Corp.'s Chapter 11 case to be turned over to a Chapter
7 liquidator, saying the time is right for a court-appointed
trustee to resolve remaining disputes after an asset sale.

Judge Christopher S. Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware granted in a telephonic hearing Thursday,
February 18, 2021, an unsecured creditors' committee's uncontested
request for the conversion.

A fiduciary with fresh eyes needs to take over the company's
wind-down process and sort out disputes related to professional
fees and asset sales, said Judge Sontchi.

                About ONE Aviation Corporation

Headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico, ONE Aviation Corporation
-- http://www.oneaviation.aero/-- and its subsidiaries were
original equipment manufacturers of twin-engine light jet
aircraft.

ONE Aviation and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case. Nos. 18-12309 to 18-12320) on Oct.
9, 2018, listing its estimated assets at $10 million to $50 million
and estimated liabilities at $100 million to $500 million. The
petition was signed by Alan Klapmeier, CEO.

The Debtors tapped Paul Hastings LLP as their bankruptcy counsel;
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as co-counsel of Paul
Hastings; Ernst & Young LLP as financial advisor; Duff & Phelps
Securities, LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as its claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Oct. 22, 2018.  The committee tapped
Lowenstein Sandler LLP as its legal counsel; Landis Rath & Cobb LLP
as the firm's co-counsel; and Conway MacKenzie, Inc. as financial
advisor.


ORANGE COUNTY BAIL: Global Says Projected Income Illusory
---------------------------------------------------------
Legal Services Bureau, Inc., d/b/a Global Fugitive Recovery, on
Feb. 19, 2021, submitted an opposition to debtor Orange County Bail
Bonds Inc.'s brief in support of confirmation of the Debtor's
Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated January 5,
2021.

The Debtor Brief's asserts its Second Amended Plan complies with
all requirements for confirmation set forth under 11 U.S.C. Sec.
1191 and therefore should be confirmed notwithstanding the
Subchapter V Trustee's and Global's objections to confirmation.
The Debtor "disputes Trustee's standing to raise substantive
objections at Plan Confirmation," and asserts that "Trustee's
objection as to whether the Plan satisfies the cramdown
requirements of section 1191(c) is easily met."  Similarly, the
Debtor asserts that Global's challenge to the feasibility of the
Plan, "is satisfied."

"[T]he Debtor's Brief, which attempts to dismiss the Subchapter V
Trustee's objections, and ignores or otherwise glosses over
Global's objections, does little to show that Debtor has satisfied
its burden of proof to establish that the Plan is "fair and
equitable" under 11 U.S.C. 1191(c) or that feasibility has been met
under 11 U.S.C. 1129(a)(11).  Therefore, the Court should deny
confirmation of Debtor's Plan and grant Global's motion to
dismiss," counsel to Global, D. Edward Hays, Esq., at Marshack Hays
LLP, tells the Court.

According to Global, the Debtor has not specifically addressed or
agreed to correct the deficiencies noted in the Trustee's
Objection.

Global notes that unsecured creditors may receive no distribution
should Debtor have no "actual disposable income."  As demonstrated
in Global's objection, the Plan does not meet the "fair and
equitable" requirement of Sec. 1191(c) because the Debtor is
operating at a loss, has operated throughout this entire case at a
substantial loss, and its projected disposable income is illusory.

"Unless Debtor commits to making the Plan 'fair and equitable' to
unsecured creditors by pledging specific amounts, confirmation
should be denied.  Debtor's substantial losses incurred in this
case have already drained the vast majority of the Saddozai
proceeds which should have been available to pay unsecured
creditors.  The Debtor may not continue to put all risk of
receiving any benefit from continued operations on creditors,"
Global asserts.

A copy of the objection filed Feb. 19, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/37zRVf5

                 About Orange County Bail Bonds

Orange County Bail Bonds Inc. -- http://www.bailall.com/-- is a
bail bond service headquartered in Santa Ana, Calif.  The company
is family owned and operated, and specializes in bail bonds for
drug-related and drunk driving DUI offenses, spousal abuse and
domestic violence charges, prostitution solicitation charges,
felonies, and misdemeanors.  Starting in 1963, the company has been
servicing Orange County, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino,
and San Diego.

Orange County Bail Bonds sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12411) on June 21,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of between $1
million and $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Erithe A.
Smith.  Marc Forsythe, Esq., at Goe & Forsythe, LLP, is the
Debtor's counsel; and Griffiths Diehl & Company, Inc., is the
accountant to the Debtor.


ORANGE COUNTY BAIL: Subchapter V Trustee Awaits Plan Changes
------------------------------------------------------------
Mark M. Sharf, the Subchapter V Trustee appointed in Orange County
Bail Bonds Inc.'s small business case, submitted a response to the
Debtor's brief in support of confirmation of the Debtor's Second
Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated January 5, 2021.

According to the Subchapter V Trustee, the Debtor's counsel has
indicated the the Debtor will be amending its plan to provide that
the Debtor not receive a discharge unless it:

     a) pays all actual disposable income over five years; and

     b) at a minimum the Debtor pays unsecured creditors -- in
addition to the initial estimated $121,000 to $142,000 distribution
from the Saddozai residence -- another $181,000 over five years.

This $181,000 figure roughly represents base 5YRPDI plus one year's
worth of a large bond sale.  While the Debtor may in fact pay
substantially more to unsecured creditors (as more large bond sales
may be realized), the Debtor is willing to commit to at least one
year's increased income based on this assumption.

The Subchapter V Trustee believes the Debtor's willingness to pay
actual disposable income while guaranteeing a minimum payment of
$181,000 (over and above the initial Saddozai distribution to
unsecured creditors) are signs of good faith.  That is particularly
true because $181,000 represents a reasonable estimate of three
years' worth of projected disposable income (the minimum
requirement of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1191(c)(2)(A)).

The Trustee is willing to recommend confirmation if and only if:

    1. The Debtor amends its plan to incorporate the guaranteed
minimum payment referenced above (in addition to the distribution
of the Sadozzai proceeds to unsecured creditors already provided
for in the Plan); and

    2. The Debtor amends the Plan to incorporate these two
provisions contained in the Disclosure Statement (but which are now
missing from the plan):

       a. assets will not revest in the Debtor upon confirmation
(as discussed in the Disclosure Statement at p. 42 of 56 of Doc.
243, lns 27-28) but rather upon entry of the discharge; and

       b. the Debtor's related persons/entities execute a tolling
agreement currently regarding potential avoidance power actions (as
mentioned in Doc. 243, p. 42 of 56 at lines 21-26).  In fact the
tolling agreements should be drafted, executed and filed with the
court prior to and as a condition of confirmation.

A copy of the Trustee's response filed Feb. 19, 2021, is available
at https://bit.ly/3dyU8ez

                 About Orange County Bail Bonds

Orange County Bail Bonds Inc. -- http://www.bailall.com/-- is a
bail bond service headquartered in Santa Ana, Calif.  The company
is family owned and operated, and specializes in bail bonds for
drug-related and drunk driving DUI offenses, spousal abuse and
domestic violence charges, prostitution solicitation charges,
felonies, and misdemeanors.  Starting in 1963, the company has been
servicing Orange County, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino,
and San Diego.

Orange County Bail Bonds sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12411) on June 21,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of between $1
million and $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Erithe A.
Smith.  Marc Forsythe, Esq., at Goe & Forsythe, LLP, is the
Debtor's counsel; and Griffiths Diehl & Company, Inc., is the
accountant to the Debtor.


P&L DEVELOPMENT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of P&L Development, LLC and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

P&L Development's ("PLD") B3 Corporate Family Rating reflects its
high financial leverage and its more moderate scale, as compared to
other larger and better capitalized competitors. PLD has limited
geographic diversity, with the majority of its revenues derived
from US markets, where the competitive landscape for store brand
over-the-counter products is intense. Partially offsetting these
risks are PLD's attractive growth prospects for nicotine
replacement therapy products and other OTC marketed products in an
environment where health care costs will continue to be a focus for
consumers.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.  


PALM BEACH: Creditors to Get Paid from Liquidation of Receivables
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Palm Beach Brain & Spine, LLC, ("PBBS") Midtown Outpatient Surgery
Center, LLC ("MOSC"), and Midtown Anesthesia Group, LLC ("MAG")
submitted a Chapter 11 Plan and a Joint Disclosure Statement dated
Feb. 16, 2021.

Prior to the filing of the cases, to increase cash flow, the
Debtors' Manager, Dr. Amos Dare, decided to sell the Letters of
Protection ("LOPs") to various receivable factoring companies (the
"Purchasers"). Since Dr. Dare is no longer the Manager of the
Debtors, it is difficult to ascertain the exact date he began to
sell the LOPs. Upon information and belief, it likely began in
2017. Throughout this Disclosure Statement, the purchased LOPs will
be referred as Purchased Receivables.

In March 2020, the Debtors sold MOSC to a non-insider third party,
which proved to be a complex transaction. Also, in March 2020,
RIPA, LLC sold the medical office condominium where PBBS was
located to a non-insider third party. As a result, these cases
became pure liquidating cases.

The Debtors' Plan is a liquidating plan, meaning that a Liquidating
Agent will be appointed to collect and liquidate the sole remaining
assets of the Debtors, the Unsold Receivables for the benefit of
the Creditors.

Class Five consists of General Unsecured Claims. The General
Unsecured Claims include all other allowed claims of Unsecured
Creditors of the Debtors, subject to any objections that are filed
and sustained by the Court. The general unsecured creditors shall
be paid on a pro rata basis from the collection and liquidation of
the Unsold Receivables. The dividend to this class shall not
commence until the Administrative claims and Classes 1-3 are paid
in full.  The dividend to this class of creditors is subject to
change upon the determination of objections to claims and the
collection and liquidation of the Unsold Receivables. These claims
are impaired.

The Debtors believe that the risk of non-payment of the percentage
distribution to the unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 is
greatly outweighed by the more substantial risk of non-payment
should this Bankruptcy be converted to a Chapter 7 Liquidation,
wherein the unsecured creditors would receive a distribution of
0%.

Creditors of Class Six consist of the Purchasers of Purchased
Receivables having purchased existing accounts receivables from the
Debtors related to medical treatment provided pursuant to a patient
lien and/or letter of protection. These Purchasers shall continue
to collect the Purchased Receivables subject to any rights to any
residual that the Debtors may have and any setoff/recoupment rights
that Purchasers may have. To the extent the Purchaser is not paid
in full, the Purchaser shall be entitled to a General Unsecured
Claim in Class 5. This treatment is without prejudice to any
interests that Northern Trust has in the Purchased Receivables.

There shall be no distribution to the equity holders of the Debtors
under the confirmed Plan and no dividends to this class of
claimants. The equity shareholders shall retain their currently
held equity interest in the Debtors. This claim is impaired.

The source for payments under the Plan shall be the cash proceeds
derived from the liquidation of the Debtors' collection of Unsold
Receivables for each Debtor and any other assets of the Debtor that
may be liquidated.

A full-text copy of the Joint Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 16,
2021, is available at https://bit.ly/3sa71zM from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for Debtors:

     KELLEY, FULTON & KAPLAN, P.L.
     Craig I. Kelley, Esquire
     Florida Bar No.: 782203
     1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
     The Forum - Suite 1000
     West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
     Telephone: (561) 491-1200
     Facsimile: (561) 684-3773

               About Palm Beach Brain and Spine

Palm Beach Brain & Spine -- http://www.pbbsneuro.com/-- is a
medical practice providing neurosurgery, minimally invasive spine
surgery, and treatment for cancer of the brain and spine.

Palm Beach Brain & Spine and two affiliates, Midtown Outpatient
Surgery Center, LLC and Midtown Anesthesia Group, LLC, filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 19-20831) on Aug. 15, 2019.

The petitions were signed by Dr. Amos O. Dare, manager. Palm Beach
Brain disclosed $13,412,202 in assets and $2,685,278 in
liabilities. Midtown Outpatient disclosed $6,857,558 in assets and
$2,920,846 in liabilities while Midtown Anesthesia listed
$5,081,861 in assets and under $50,000 in liabilities.

Judge Mindy A. Mora is the case judge. Dana L. Kaplan, Esq. and
Craig I. Kelley, Esq., at Kelley Fulton & Kaplan, P.L. are the
Debtors' counsel.


PDC BEAUTY: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B3 CFR
----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of PDC Beauty & Wellness Co. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

PDC Wellness & Personal Care Co.'s B3 Corporate Family Rating
reflects its high financial leverage, small scale relative to
larger and better capitalized competitors, aggressive acquisition
strategy, and event risk related to its majority ownership by a
financial sponsor. Demand for the company's products are also
vulnerable to shifts in consumer preferences, weakness in household
income, retailers' shelf space allocation and marketing support.
The mass fragrance, bath, multicultural hair care and beauty
segments are also highly competitive and Parfums faces steep
competition from branded product companies that are significantly
larger, more diverse, financially stronger, and which have much
greater investment capacity. These factors are partially balanced
by the company's projected ability to generate free cash flow, good
geographic and product diversification and solid historical organic
growth in several of the company's key product categories. Parfum's
credit profile is also supported by good liquidity, good brand name
recognition in niche markets, and our expectation that continued
distribution gains and product development will support the
company's operating performance over the next 12 to 18 months.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Performance Aircraft Leasing, Inc.
        801 Asbury Drive
        Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Business Description: Performance Aircraft Leasing, Inc. owns a
                      1976 Lear 35 serial #95 aircraft valued at
                      $225,000.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois

Case No.: 21-02211

Debtor's Counsel: Robert R. Benjamin, Esq.
                  GOLAN CHRISTIE TAGLIA LLP
                  70 W. Madison
                  Suite 1500
                  Chicago, IL 60602
                  Tel: (312) 263-2300
                  E-mail: rrbenjamin@gct.law

Total Assets: $327,921

Total Liabilities: $3,684,754

The petition was signed by Edward H. Wachs, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's five unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/DTDPFWQ/Performance_Aircraft_Leasing_Inc__ilnbke-21-02211__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


PERFORMANCE FOOD: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'B+' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its rating outlook on U.S.-based
Performance Food Group Inc. (PFG) to positive from negative. At the
same time, S&P affirmed its 'B+' issuer credit rating on the
company and its 'B' issue-level rating on the senior unsecured
notes, with a '5' recovery rating.

The positive outlook reflects the potential for a higher rating
over the next year if adjusted leverage improves comfortably below
5x, which may result if PFG's business continues to recover, driven
by improving sales trends, share gains, and cost controls.

The outlook revision reflects the company's recent
better-than-expected operating performance and our expectation for
continued recovery in fiscal 2021. Although the trajectory of the
virus is still uncertain, PFG's business showed resilience during
the pandemic and continued to navigate through the challenging
market conditions. The company's sales trends continued to improve
sequentially from the significant decline earlier last year driven
by COVID-19. Despite a modest slowdown in December due to greater
away-from-home dining restrictions, fewer holiday parties, and some
impact on outdoor dining in colder weather states, sales trends in
the food service business have shown a modest rebound in January,
which was more in line with year-over-year comparisons in October
and November. PFG's independent restaurant channel has continued to
outperform the category, driven by Pizza and Mexican concepts, and
independent case volume declines improved sequentially despite a
challenging December.  

S&P said, "We expect continued recovery in operating performance in
fiscal 2021 as the rollout of vaccines presents a pathway to
improving demand for the company's services. Moreover, several
large U.S. states and municipalities have eased restrictions or
expressed a willingness to do so. Operating performance should also
benefit over the near term due to the seasonally warmer spring and
summer months. We expect the company to continue to gain market
share, driven by its sales force investment and business mix. We
believe PFG is well positioned due to its diversified portfolio and
channels and expect continued strong performance in the Pizza,
Mexican, and Italian categories."

The pace of PFG's recovery has outpaced that of other large
broadline food service distributors because of its business mix and
skew toward the Pizza and Mexican categories, which performed well.
S&P said, "We believe PFG's business mix should limit downside
pressure on its credit metrics if there are future meaningful
lockdowns in the U.S. in response to worsening virus conditions
(which is not assumed in our base case scenario). That said,
although we believe PFG would benefit from a more rapid return to
normal conditions, its level of improvement would probably trail
that of other large food service distributors, which we believe are
over-indexed to independent restaurants that are still a long way
from recovery."

S&P said, "We expect some channels in the Vistar segment to remain
challenged and have a slower recovery. Several of Vistar's channels
were significantly affected by COVID-19. It remains uncertain when
the occupancy in movie theatres, professional office, and travel
will return to normal levels. We continue to expect a slower
recovery in theatres, office coffee services, travel, and
hospitality and not expect a rebound until the vaccination plan is
fully executed. Despite the weakness in some channels, the
convenience store channel has performed relatively well. The Vistar
segment is about 30% of the overall EBITDA, and we estimate about
25% of the channels within Vistar to have a slower recovery."

Adequate liquidity should enable the company to withstand
meaningful industry headwinds. PFG has about $1.9 billion of
liquidity as of the fiscal second quarter, including $417 million
of cash and nearly $1.5 billion of availability on its asset-based
lending (ABL) revolving credit facility. S&P said, "We expect PFG
to use cash on hand to pay off its $110 million junior term loan
and reduce its outstanding balance on its ABL revolver. We forecast
liquidity will be sufficient to weather industry headwinds through
2021."

The positive outlook reflects the potential for a higher rating
over the next year if PFG's business continues to recover, driven
by improving sales trends, share gains, and cost controls.

S&P said, "We could raise the rating over the next year if PFG's
operating performance continued to improve and adjusted leverage
were sustained comfortably below 5x. This could happen if recovery
were on track and sales and EBITDA approached pre-coronavirus
levels. An upgrade would also be predicated on the company
maintaining its current financial policies and not transacting
debt-financed acquisitions or share repurchases that result in any
meaningful increase in leverage.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if unfavorable industry
trends remained and we believed that the company would be unable to
reduce sustained leverage to below 5x. Industry demand and cash
flows could remain well below pre-coronavirus levels if efforts to
contain the virus failed, potentially due to adverse mutations
resulting in sustained government-imposed capacity restrictions on
restaurants or consumer hesitation to visit restaurants. It's also
possible that profitability could deteriorate if there were
widespread permanent restaurant closures or if there were a deep
protracted economic downturn. We also believe potential food and
labor cost inflation could weigh on margins and hurt prospects for
credit ratio improvement."


PETCO HEALTH: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR on Proposed Refinancing
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigning a 'B' issuer credit rating to Petco
Health and Wellness, the proposed issuer of the new debt. S&P
currently rates the existing issuer, Petco Holdings Inc., and will
discontinue its rating at this entity when the transaction is
completed.

S&P said, "We are also assigning our 'B' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to the company's proposed $1.2 billion term loan
due in 2028. The '3' recovery rating indicates our expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in the event
of a hypothetical default.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation Petco's performance
will continue to benefit beyond the pandemic as increased pet
adoption and fostering provide some tailwinds, leading to sustained
positive same-store sales, stable margins, and leverage in the
mid-4x range over the next 12 months.

"The rating reflects our expectation that Petco will complete the
refinancing, extending debt maturities with no material impact to
leverage, which is currently in the mid-4x area.   The new capital
structure will consist of a $500 million ABL due 2026 (not rated),
a $1.2 billion term loan B due 2028, and $500 million of other
senior secured debt. This refinancing with longer-term maturities
addresses issues in the company's capital structure, which
currently contains fast-approaching maturities (October 2022 for
the existing ABL and January 2023 for the term loan). As a result,
we are revising our view of its capital structure to neutral from
negative. The refinancing is on the back of a successful IPO,
through which the company raised about $1 billion of proceeds and
reduced debt, improving leverage by roughly two turns to the mid-4x
area.

"Higher pet adoption rates through the pandemic have provided
revenue tailwinds, though we are monitoring competitive threats.  
Pet ownership has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and
contributed to solid sales growth during the past few quarters. In
addition, as consumers spend more time at home and reduce spending
on out-of-home entertainment, they have reallocated discretionary
income toward products that improve their lives at home. In our
view, this contributed to higher sales of pet hardgoods in 2020. We
expect sales growth in 2021, albeit at lower rate year over year,
as sales of hardgoods and specialty merchandise (such as leashes
and pet beds) moderate in the weaker consumer spending environment.
We believe Petco's performance has benefited from its heightened
emphasis on business investments.

"Online competition from Chewy and Amazon, as well as mass
merchants, remain a formidable threat. We do not believe Petco has
a solid online presence relative to these peers, and we consider
competitive pressures from larger peers as risks to the company's
business. According to Petco's recent SEC filing, the pet care
industry has grown at a compounded annual growth rate of 5%.
However, we believe Petco's average growth will be below the
industry average, given the onslaught of online competitors and
mass merchants, which will continue to change the competitive
landscape.

"Petco's business investments are increasing and they should help
defend against imminent market threats.   Over the past few years,
Petco has invested about $300 million in business transformation
initiatives, which we think helped the company record good top-line
growth. We believe these initiatives, such as leveraging its
brick-and-mortar stores as mini distribution centers (to supplement
its omni-channel operations) and its commitment to offer healthy
food and general merchandise, should drive foot traffic. Additional
services, such as broader veterinary care and tele-vet, can also
provide future growth opportunities. Petco has indicated that its
stores are within three miles of 54% of its customers, and
customers who engage across its multiple-channel approach spend
3x-6x more than the single-channel customer. We believe that if
Petco can offer competing products and services at attractive
prices as well as fast delivery speeds, it could sustain decent
sales growth over the next two to three years."

In conjunction with the IPO transaction, $450 million (of $750
million) of Petco's senior unsecured notes were exchanged for
Scooby Aggregator L.P.'s notes (a holding company owned by the
financial sponsors CVC Capital Partners Advisory (U.S.) Inc. and
Canada Pension Plan Investment Board). The company paid the
remaining portion at par. Scooby will hold the financial sponsors'
remaining ownership of the public company (about 80%), which will
secure the new notes issued at Scooby. S&P said, "We viewed this
exchange as opportunistic. Through Scooby Aggregator L.P., we
believe the sponsors have influence on corporate decision making.
We anticipate that the holding company debt paydown will be
completed through secondary share sales of the equity. However, we
note the potential for future dividends from Petco to pay down debt
or service interest, though we believe the risk of this is low
because of public minority interest ownership and our view that the
sponsor will gradually reduce its ownership. Still, we include the
Scooby obligations ($450 million of debt) in our calculation of
credit metrics to reflect the obligation of the holding company."

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that leverage will
remain in the mid-4x area over the next 12 months, improving
modestly on same-store sales growth and stable profit margins.

S&P could raise its rating on Petco if:

-- S&P believes it is successfully navigating the risks of
competitive threats in the pet supply industry, which would be
evidenced by Petco achieving consistently positive same store
sales, expansion of e-commerce and service revenues, and
maintenance of EBITDA margins. Under this scenario, its view of the
company's competitive positioning could improve; and

-- S&P expects debt to EBITDA will decline to and remain below 4x
with minimal risk of a leveraging event, likely requiring the exit
of the sponsors.

S&P could take a negative rating action if:

-- S&P anticipates debt to EBITDA will rise to and remain above
5.5x, which could occur if same-store sales are meaningfully
negative and EBITDA margins decline by more than 200 bps; or

-- The company is unsuccessful in its refinancing attempt, failing
to address the near-term maturities in its capital structure.


PH BEAUTY III: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa1 CFR
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of pH Beauty Holdings III, Inc. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

ph Beauty's Caa1 Corporate Family Rating reflects the company's
high financial leverage, small scale as compared to larger
competitors, and event risk related to its majority ownership by a
financial sponsor. The cosmetic accessories and facial skin care
industries are also highly competitive, and demand for these
products is vulnerable to weakness in household income, retailers'
shelf space allocation and marketing support. pH Beauty faces steep
competition from branded product companies that are significantly
larger, more diverse, financially stronger, and which have much
greater investment capacity. Leverage is high and Moody's expects
aggressive financial policies under private equity ownership. The
company's credit profile is supported by pH Beauty's strong brand
name recognition in niche markets.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


PHILADELPHIA AUTHORITY: S&P Lowers Long-Term ICR to 'CCC (sf)'
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term ratings to 'CCC (sf)' from
'BB- (sf)' and 'B+ (sf)' on Philadelphia Authority for Industrial
Development's series 2016A and subordinate 2016B senior housing
revenue bonds (The Pavilion), respectively. The outlook is
negative.

"The rating action reflects our opinion of Pavilion Apartments Penn
LLC's default on various covenants, announced in a disclosure
report filed by the trustee, Wilmington Trust, on Electronic
Municipal Market Access, posted Feb. 17, 2021," said S&P Global
Ratings credit analyst Daniel Pulter. These included covenant
defaults under the loan agreement pertaining to basic loan
payments, the rate covenant, failure to retain a management
consultant, and failure to submit a report from an insurance
consultant. The downgrade also reflects our view that additional,
specific default scenarios are envisioned within the next 12 months
without an unforeseen positive development.



PHUNWARE INC: Closes Offering of $24.7-Mil. Worth of Common Stock
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Phunware, Inc. has closed its previously announced underwritten
public offering of common stock, effective Feb. 12, 2021.

Phunware sold a total of 11,761,111 shares of its common stock in
the offering, after the underwriter's partial exercise of its
overallotment option.  Net proceeds to Phunware from the offering
were approximately $24.7 million, after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses.

Northland Securities Inc. and Roth Capital Partners acted as joint
book-running managers for the offering.

A registration statement relating to the securities being sold in
the offering was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission on Feb. 11, 2021.  A final prospectus supplement related
to the offering was filed with the SEC on Feb. 12, 2021 and is
available on the SEC's website located at www.sec.gov.  Copies of
the final prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus
relating to the offering may be obtained, when available, from
Northland Securities, Inc., Attention: Heidi Fletcher, 150 South
Fifth Street, Suite 3300, Minneapolis, MN 55402, or by calling
(612) 851-4918, or by emailing
hfletcher@northlandcapitalmarkets.com; Roth Capital Partners, LLC,
888 San Clemente Drive, Suite 400, Newport Beach, CA 92660, (800)
678-9147 or by accessing the SEC's website, www.sec.gov.

                           About Phunware

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Phunware, Inc. --
http://www.phunware.com-- is a Multiscreen-as-a-Service (MaaS)
company, a fully integrated enterprise cloud platform for mobile
that provides companies the products, solutions, data and services
necessary to engage, manage and monetize their mobile application
portfolios and audiences globally at scale.

Phunware incurred a net loss of $12.87 million in 2019 compared to
a net loss of $9.80 million in 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the
Company had $29.35 million in total assets, $34.16 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $4.81 million.

Marcum LLP, in Houston, TX, the Company's auditor since 2017,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
30, 2020 citing that the Company has a significant working capital
deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise
additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


POINCIANA MANAGEMENT: Seeks Feb. 28 Plan Filing Extension
---------------------------------------------------------
Poinciana Management Group, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, to extend its
exclusive plan filing and solicitation periods from February 18 to
February 28, 2021.

The Debtor says it owns residential real estate in Miami-Dade
County which has fallen delinquent on its obligations to its sole
mortgage lender, Barreto Capital, LLC as well as to the Miami-Dade
Tax Collector for delinquent property taxes.  The Debtor says the
bankruptcy filing was triggered by the imminent sale of the
property by Barreto.

"The Debtor intends to file a plan of reorganization that will
provide for the complete payoff Barreto's lien and the delinquent
real estate taxes.  The Debtor seeks an extension of the exclusive
period within which it may file a disclosure statement and plan of
reorganization and ultimately solicit acceptances of any such plan
by ten days, up through and including February 28, 2021.  T[he
extension] request is being made to ensure the Debtor's continued
management of its financial affairs and continued negotiation with
its creditors, as well as to preserve the Debtor's possibility of
reorganization," Poinciana explains.

                    About Poinciana Management Group

Poinciana Management Group LLC is a Miami. Fla.-based registered
investment advisory firm serving individuals, families and
institutions.

Poinciana Management Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-21528) on October
21, 2020.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of
between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of the same range.

Peter Spindel, Esq. P.A. is the Debtor's legal counsel.


PORTOFINO TOWERS: Wins April 25 Plan Exclusivity Extension
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge A. Jay Cristol of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida extended the periods within which Portofino
Towers 1002 LLC has the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan
through and including April 25, 2021, and to solicit acceptances
through and including June 24, 2021.

The Court considered the arguments of counsel and the U.S Trustee,
and the Debtor has filed the delinquent Monthly Operating Reports
as a condition of the entry of this Order.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2M1ZiEB at no extra charge.

                         About Portofino Towers 1002 LLC

Portofino Towers 1002 LLC owns a condo at 300 S Pointe Dr. Unit
1002, Miami Beach FL 33139.

Portofino Towers 1002 LLC filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
20-20446) on September 27, 2020. The petition was signed by Laurent
Benzaquen, authorized member (AMBR). At the time of filing, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge A. Jay Cristol. Joel M. Aresty,
Esq. at JOEL M. ARESTY P.A. represents the Debtor as counsel.

Until further notice, the United States Trustee said it will not
appoint a committee of creditors pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section
1102.


POTENTIAL DYNAMIX: Amazon Limited Liability Clause Unenforceable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Daniel P. Collins of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona denied Amazon Services LLC's Motion for
Partial Summary Judgement, that requested the Court to enforce the
limiation of liability clause in the Amazon Services Business
Solutions Agreement.

Chapter 11 Trustee Timothy H. Shaffer filed a complaint against
Amazon, which sought, among other things, damages due to Amazon's
alleged breach of its Agreement with Debtor Potential Dynamix, LLC.
In its Motion, Amazon argues that, even if the Trustee can prove
his claims at trial, the damages are limited to $2,206,369.  In
support of this proposition, Amazon cites the last sentence of the
Clause which states: "FURTHER, OUR AGGREGATE LIABILITY ARISING OUT
OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED WILL NOT EXCEED AT ANY TIME THE TOTAL AMOUNTS DURING
THE PRIOR SIX MONTH PERIOD PAID BY YOU TO AMAZON IN CONNECTION WITH
THE PARTICULAR SERVICE GIVING RISE TO THE CLAIM."

Relying on Delaware case law, Amazon suggested that limitation of
liability clauses between two business like Amazon and the Debtor
are routinely enforced when they are clearly written, where damages
were uncertain at the time of contracting, and when the limitation
is reasonable.   Amazon argued that the Clause was clear, and it
was written in all capital letters.  Amazon also suggested any
potential claimed damages were uncertain at the time of the
Agreement "because the parties could not predict the amount of any
claims that might arise, given the thousands of inventory units and
transactions involved and the many years that have passed."
Finally, Amazon contended the damage limitation in the Clause "is
reasonable because the Trustee now seeks to recover far more than
the amount he alleged in the Complaint."

The Trustee responded arguing: (1) the general terms of the Clause
do not override Amazon's specific duties and liabilities under
Section F-4 of the Agreement and that the Agreement does not
contain a liability limitation; and (2) the damage limitation is
unreasonable and unconscionable.

Judge Collins found that Washington law, not Delaware law, governs
the enforceability of the Clause.  "The Clause is a part of the
Agreement and the Agreement explicitly states elsewhere that 'the
laws of the State of Washington. . . .' govern the Agreement," he
explained.

The Trustee argued the Clause is a general provision which
conflicts with, and must be read as subordinate to, the specific
language of Section F-4 of the Agreement. That provision states:
"Payment of the Replacement Value is [Amazon's] total liability for
any duties or obligations [Amazon] or [its] agents or
representatives may have as a bailee or warehouseman, and
[Debtor's] only right or remedy that [Debtor] may have as a
bailor."  The Trustee contends this specific language overrides the
general language of the Clause and its limitation of damages.

The Court disagreed.  "Section F- 4 tells this Court the Debtor's
damages are measured by Replacement Value when Amazon loses,
destroys, misplaces, etc. Debtor's inventory. The Clause, however,
indicates that damages claimed by Debtor, however measured, are
limited to 6 months' worth of fees paid to Amazon," Judge Collins
said.

The Trustee's second argument points to the Restatement (Second) of
Contracts, Section 208, which the Trustee asserts Washington courts
follow.  The Trustee contended that, under the Restatement, the
damage limitation is unconscionable because the Agreement was a
standardized form, was not negotiated, not signed by either party,
binds a party merely by use of the services, and has a damage
limitation that is one sided, unreasonably restrictive and
unilaterally limits only Amazon's liability.

Judge Collins said that "Washington courts apply a 6-factor
balancing test to determine whether a contract provision violates
public policy. 22 If more of the 6 factors appear in a given
exculpatory agreement, the agreement is more likely to be declared
invalid on public policy grounds."  Washington's 6-factor balancing
test is as follows:

     (1) the agreement concerns an endeavor of a type generally
thought suitable for public regulations;

     (2) the party seeking exculpation is engaged in performing a
service of great importance to the public, which is often a matter
of practical necessity for some members of the public;

     (3) such party holds itself out as willing to perform this
service for any member of the public who seeks it, or at least for
any member coming within certain established standards;

     (4) because of the essential nature of the service, in the
economic setting of the transaction, the party invoking exculpation
possesses a decisive advantage of bargaining strength against any
member of the public who seeks the services;

     (5) in exercising a superior bargaining power, the party
confronts the public with a standardized adhesion contract of
exculpation, and makes no provision whereby a purchaser may pay
additional reasonable fees and obtain protection against
negligence; and

     (6) the person or property of members of the public seeking
such services must be placed under the control of the furnisher,
subject to the risk of carelessness on the part of the furnisher,
its employees, or agents.

The Court found that the Clause satisfied a majority of the
factors, specifically:

     1. Amazon operates in a regulated industry and must comply
with a myriad of statutory and regulatory requirements.

     2. Amazon is the dominant online platform for internet sales
of most any product one can imagine. One can argue that Amazon
provides an essential or necessary public service, especially
during the current pandemic.

     3. Amazon holds itself out to the general public as willing to
sell its services to any member of the public who seeks it, subject
to certain limitations.

     4. Whether or not Amazon's platform is considered essential,
it does possess a decisive advantage of bargaining strength.
Although the Debtor could have taken its business elsewhere if they
disagreed to the provisions found in the Agreement, there really is
no comparable internet-based channel it could have used to sell its
tens of thousands of products.  In the world of e-commerce, Amazon
is THE go-to online shopping platform.  That said, the Debtor did
nominally have the option of taking its business elsewhere.

     5. The Agreement was a standardized form that bound a customer
to its terms merely by using Amazon's services.  There was no
possibility or hope of Debtor modifying any terms or provisions in
the Agreement, there could be no negotiation, and no signatures
were required. The Agreement was truly a "take it or leave it"
proposition.  The Agreement is an adhesion contract.

     6. Under the Agreement, Amazon gained exclusive control over
the Debtor's inventory. This fact placed the Debtor under the tight
control of Amazon.

"At least 5, and possibly 6, of the Washington factors point
towards recognition that its public policy is violated by the
liability limitation contained in the subject Clause of the
parties' Agreement.  Accordingly, this Court finds the Clause is
unenforceable as violative of Washington's public policy and
violates the 3rd requirement if the Clause were to be enforceable.
In summary, none of the legal perquisites found in Washington's
case law are present for this Court to enforce the terms of the
Clause," Judge Collins held.

The case is In re: POTENTIAL DYNAMIX LLC, Debtor. TIMOTHY H.
SHAFFER, Chapter 11, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. AMAZON SERVICES LLC,
Defendant, Case No. Case No. 2:11-bk-28944-DPC, Adversary No.
2:13-ap-00799 (Bankr. D. Ariz.).  A full-text copy of the Under
Advisement Order Re Limitation of Liability Clause, dated February
15, 2021, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y93373x9 from
Leagle.com.

                    About Potential Dynamix

Potential Dynamix LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 11-28944) on Oct. 13,
2011.  In the petition signed by Daniel Bellino, its managing
member, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1,000,001
to $10,000,000.  Judge Daniel P. Collins presides over the case.
James F. Kahn, P.C., was the Debtor's legal counsel.

On Jan. 27, 2012, Timothy H. Shaffer was appointed as Chapter 11
trustee.  The trustee hired Schian Walker P.L.C. as bankruptcy
counsel.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Debtor's case.  Allen Barnes & Jones, PLC represents the committee
as legal counsel.


PRESTIGE BRANDS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B1 CFR
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Prestige Brands, Inc. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Prestige Consumer Healthcare's B1 Corporate Family Rating reflects
its strong and stable free cash flow from diverse over-the-counter
branded products. The company's products are generally among the
leading brands in their respective niche categories and largely
allow consumers to treat common, recurring ailments. Prestige's
branded products typically have long commercial histories and have
built broad appeal and trust among consumers. The company's
outsourced manufacturing creates a variable cost structure and
limits the need for sizable capital spending, which favorably
contributes to cash flow stability. That said, the company operates
in mature categories with flat-to-low single-digit organic growth.
Prestige's sales have declined following the divestiture of noncore
brands. More recently, sales in certain categories related to
travel and sports activities have declined due to reduced
consumption, reflecting headwinds related to the coronavirus. That
said EBITDA margins will remain relatively steady given the
company's continued productivity improvements and cost reduction
initiatives. The company's modest scale as compared to large
diversified consumer peers and OTC business focus create greater
relative exposure to category competition and concentrated retail
distribution.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


PSW VENTURE: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
----------------------------------------------
Debtor: PSW Venture LLC
        180 E Grapeview Point
        Allyn, WA 98524

Business Description: PSW Venture is primarily engaged in renting
                      and leasing real estate properties.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 18, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Washington

Case No.: 21-40280

Judge: Hon. Brian D. Lynch

Debtor's Counsel: David C. Smith, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF DAVID SMITH, PLLC
                  201 Saint Helens Ave
                  Tacoma, WA 98402
                  Tel: 253-272-4777
                  Fax: 253-461-8888
                  E-mail: david@davidsmithlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Patricia Williams, the managing member.

The Debtor lists Chase as its sole unsecured creditor holding a
claim of $11,000.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/VMZA7RY/PSW_Venture_LLC__wawbke-21-40280__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


REGIONAL PAVEMENT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Regional Pavement Maintenance of Arizona, Inc.
        7770 Venture Street
        Colorado Springs, CO 80951

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado

Case No.: 21-10808

Judge: Hon. Joseph G. Rosania Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: David J. Warner, Esq.
                  WADSWORTH GARBER WARNER CONRARDY, P.C.
                  2580 West Main Street, Suite 200
                  Littleton, CO 80120
                  Tel: 303-296-1999
                  E-mail: dwarner@wgwc-law.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Aaron Avery, CEO.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/2ZF2WQA/Regional_Pavement_Maintenance__cobke-21-10808__0004.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/P5PWWXA/Regional_Pavement_Maintenance__cobke-21-10808__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


RENAISSANCE HOLDING: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR on Nearpod Acquisition
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Renaissance Holding Corp.'s (dba
Renaissance Learning) B3 Corporate Family Rating and B3-PD
Probability of Default Rating following the company's proposed
acquisition of Nearpod. Moody's also affirmed the B2 rating for the
company's first lien senior credit facilities including revolver
and term loan, and affirmed the Caa2 rating for the second lien
term loan. Additionally, Moody's assigned a B2 rating to the
proposed $140 million of new revolver (upsized and extended from
the existing $80 million revolver due 2023). The outlook remains
stable.

The $650 million acquisition of Nearpod along with related fees and
expenses will be financed with an additional $358 million first
lien term loan and $135 million second lien term loan, as well as
equity contribution from its equity sponsor, Francisco Partners.
Moody's views this primarily debt funded acquisition as very
aggressive financial policy because it will increase Moody's
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA leverage to in excess of 10.0x pro forma
for the transaction (vs low 9.0x for the trailing twelve months
ended September 30) due to the high acquisition multiple the
company is paying for Nearpod.

Given the very high pro forma leverage, Moody's views the company
as weakly positioned in the B3 category. However, Moody's affirmed
the ratings based on the expectation that Renaissance Learning will
be able to de-lever to below 9.0x debt-to-EBITDA by year end 2022
with solid earnings growth including realization of synergies from
the Nearpod acquisition. The affirmation also reflects the
company's track record of successfully integrating acquisitions in
the past. Pro forma for the transaction, the company will have good
liquidity with $71 million cash on balance sheet to fund seasonal
working capital needs and is expected to generate positive free
cash flow of over $30 million over the next year, which also
supports the affirmation of the B3 CFR. The company is upsizing its
revolver from $80 million to $140 million, which Moody's expects
will primarily be used to fund working capital needs for the year.
The acquisition will further increase Renaissance Learning's scale
with Nearpod's content delivery platform as well as additional
content from the existing learning products on Nearpod's platform.
Additionally, the educational technology industry is experiencing
high growth accelerated by the coronavirus pandemic and the
increase in distance learning.

Moody's took the following ratings actions:

Issuer: Renaissance Holding Corp.

Ratings Affirmed:

Corporate Family Rating, affirmed at B3

Probability of Default Rating, affirmed at B3-PD

Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility, affirmed
at B2 (LGD3)

Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, affirmed at B2 (LGD3)

Gtd Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan, affirmed at Caa2 (LGD5)

Ratings Assigned

New $140 million Gtd Senior Secured first lien revolver, assigned
B2 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Remains Stable

Moody's expects to withdraw the B2 rating on the existing revolver
expiring in 2023 once the transaction closes and the new revolver
is in place.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Renaissance Learning's B3 CFR broadly reflects its very high
leverage as the result of aggressive growth strategy with debt
funded acquisition. Pro forma Moody's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA
exceeds 10.0x (after deducting software development costs).
Debt-to-EBITDA leverage would be in the 8.0x range if the change in
deferred revenue is included in the calculation of EBITDA. Although
Moody's expects leverage will decline to below 9.0x due to earnings
growth over the next 12 to 18 months including through the
realization of synergies, Renaissance Learning's leverage is
expected to remain high over the longer term given its private
equity ownership and a growth strategy that incorporates strategic
debt funded acquisitions. The leverage weakly positions the company
within the rating category. The rating is also constrained by the
competitive nature of the industry with other participants in the
relatively fragmented K-12 digital learning and assessment market.
High investment needs will consume cash as the company continues to
enhance content and product features to maintain competitiveness.
However, the rating is supported by Renaissance Learning's
established brand name with a portfolio of well-recognized product
offerings in the digital education market, and solid growth
prospects driven by favorable industry fundamentals such as the
transition of educational services to more digital-oriented
delivery. The rating also benefits from the company's relatively
stable cash generating capability due to a high level of recurring
revenue and good margins.

Moody's views Renaissance Learning's governance risk as high due to
its private equity ownership by Francisco Partners. Given this,
Moody's expects an aggressive financial and acquisition strategy
that tends to favor shareholders.

The coronavirus outbreak, the government measures put in place to
contain it, and the weak global economic outlook continue to
disrupt economies and credit markets across sectors and regions.
Although an economic recovery is underway, it is tenuous, and its
continuation will be closely tied to containment of the virus. As a
result, the degree of uncertainty around our forecasts is unusually
high. Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk
under its ESG framework, given the substantial implications for
public health and safety. Renaissance Learning is experiencing
positive demand growth from school districts related to societal
trends toward digital learning tools that is being bolstered by
distance learning during the pandemic. This is more than offsetting
the drag the company's orders and sales from pressure on school
budgets from lower tax revenues.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will be able to de-lever rapidly with solid earnings growth over
the next 12 to 18 months as well as maintain good liquidity with
free cash flow generation of about $30 million over the next year.

The ratings could be downgraded if growth is weaker than expected
and leverage is not declining rapidly, market share declines,
EBITA-to-interest expense less than 1.0x, free cash flow to debt is
below 1%, or liquidity deteriorates

The ratings could be upgraded if the company delivers sustained
organic revenue and earnings growth, with Moody's adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA maintained well below 6.5x and free cash flow as a
percentage of debt sustained above 5%.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Renaissance Learning is a provider of subscription-based
educational practice and assessment software and school improvement
programs for kindergarten through senior high (K-12) schools. The
company has been owned by private equity firm Francisco Partners
since 2018. Pro forma for the acquisition, total billings (revenue
proxy) is expected to be about $400 million in 2020.


RENAISSANCE HOLDING: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
Renaissance Holding Corp. The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "We are affirming our 'B-' issue-level rating on the
company's existing first-lien debt and revolver. The recovery
rating is '3', reflecting our expectation of meaningful (50%-70%,
rounded estimate: 65%) recovery in the event of default.

"We are also affirming our 'CCC' issue-level rating on the
company's existing second-lien. The recovery rating is '6',
reflecting our expectation of negligible (0%-10%, rounded estimate:
0%) recovery in the event of default.

"Nearpod's growth justifies the purchase price. We view the Nearpod
acquisition as a growth play because Nearpod has done well,
increasing billings by almost 100% in the past year. Nearpod's
annual billings have grown to $86 million in 2020 from $33 million
in 2018, and 2021 is shaping up to be another strong year. Nearpod
focuses on digital learning tools and interactive content across
multiple platforms. Its catalog of more than 3,500
standards-aligned lessons spans every K-12 topic, from digital
citizenship to algebra and incorporates interactive assessments.

"We expect Renaissance to generate revenue growth and positive free
cash flow in 2021, despite the high debt load. Notwithstanding the
estimated leverage, which we expect to be above 10x over the next
year, we expect the pro forma company to generate positive free
cash flow, with fiscal 2021 free cash flow to debt in the 2%-3%
range. We expect pro forma 2020 revenue of about $400 million, with
the high-single revenue growth supported by the strong billings in
fiscal 2020. Recurring revenue, strong retention rates,
above-average profitability, and moderate capital expenditure
(capex) also support our free cash flow estimates. We expect
Nearpod's content and teacher-focused experiences to integrate well
with Renaissance's delivery platform content and provide value to
the company's end users. We expect additional draws on the revolver
during the first half of the calendar year, given both companies
will display similar seasonality in cash flows, but the revolver
upsize should support the company's cash needs.

"We expect COVID-19 tailwinds to continue for Ed-Tech companies. We
view ed-tech to be one of the beneficiaries of the pandemic, with
classroom technology investments by school districts likely to
remain in a post-pandemic world. The strong billing performance by
both companies shows that investments aren't stopping despite many
schools being partly opened in early 2021. There is some
uncertainty around school budget funding levels, but we view that
to be somewhat negated by the COVID-19 stimulus packages announced.
School budgets historically have been resilient to past economic
cycles, notably during 2008-2010. There may be delays in buying
decisions if administrators feel budget constraints but that hasn't
played out so far.

"The stable outlook reflects Renaissance's highly recurring and
profitable revenue base, and our expectation that the company will
successfully integrate the Nearpod assets into its product
ecosystem and will generate sufficient FOCF to meet its high debt
load.

"We could lower the rating if the education software industry
landscape evolved and the company were unable to maintain its
market position or if we saw school funding challenges, leading to
a rise in customer attrition, negative operating cash flow, and
weakening liquidity.

"Although we are unlikely to do so at this time, we could consider
an upgrade if Renaissance were able to increase its revenue while
maintaining its profitability, leading to a higher EBITDA base and
leverage declining to the 7x area."


RENTPATH HOLDINGS: Signs Deal to Sell to Redfin for $608 Million
----------------------------------------------------------------
Redfin (NASDAQ: RDFN) said Jan. 19, 2021, it has entered into an
agreement to acquire RentPath, the Atlanta-based owner of
ApartmentGuide.com, Rent.com, and Rentals.com, for $608 million in
cash.  The acquisition will bring together a leading site for
buying a home with a leading site for renting a home, giving anyone
trying to move a complete view of her options.

"RentPath has more than 20,000 apartment buildings on its rental
websites, and grew its traffic more than 25% last year," said
Redfin CEO Glenn Kelman.  "We can almost double that audience, as
one in five of Redfin.com's 40+ million monthly visitors also wants
to see homes for rent.  Together with RentPath, we can create an
online destination for every North American to find a home."

"We are energized by the transformational potential of this
combination to help more consumers find the right home and help
property managers find residents," said Dhiren Fonseca, RentPath's
CEO. "RentPath's customers experienced all-time highs in traffic
and leads from us last year and our value proposition to
multifamily property managers has never been better.  By acquiring
RentPath, Redfin will be as committed as we are to the rental
market.  As part of the Redfin family, our platform will be well
positioned to lead the market in the quality and value of our
products, while giving our current and future customers access to
many more high-intent renters through Redfin's extensive network."

Redfin, the technology-powered real estate brokerage, operates the
#1 nationwide brokerage search site.  The company uses a
combination of local real estate agents and technology to make it
easier, faster and less costly to buy or sell a home.

RentPath simplifies the apartment search experience for millions of
consumers, connecting property-management companies with qualified
prospective renters.  The RentPath network of websites reached 16
million monthly visitors on average in 2020, and recorded full year
2020 revenue of $194 million.

Strategic Rationale

   * Better Search Experience: More than a third of North American
adults currently rent, so showing rentals is an important expansion
of Redfin's mission. When consumers think of home, they'll think of
Redfin, whether they are hoping to rent or buy, sell, or find a
tenant. Redfin expects RentPath's rental listings to be on
Redfin.com in late 2022.

   * Better Value for Advertisers: Redfin will increase RentPath's
reach, creating more rental opportunities for the rental properties
promoted on RentPath sites. Redfin estimates that 10 million of
Redfin's 40+ million monthly online visitors may also be interested
in rental properties.

   * Traffic Growth: Both Redfin and RentPath grew traffic by over
20% in 2020 and have powerful channels for meeting customers and
marketing listings directly to consumers.  Together with RentPath,
Redfin will aim to compete with the largest portals on every front,
for every visitor.

   * Improving the Rental Experience: While Redfin does not expect
to hire real estate agents to represent renters, the company is
excited about the opportunities to make the whole process of
renting an apartment better.

Additional commentary from Glenn Kelman about the expected benefits
of the acquisition is available at
https://www.redfin.com/news/rentpath-acquisition.

                      Key Business Metrics

                                  Redfin      RentPath
                                  ------      --------
Headquarters                     Seattle       Atlanta
Employees (as of 12/31)           ~4,000          ~700
Avg Monthly Visitors          39 million    16 million
Organic Visitors YoY Growth          23%           26%
Total Revenue               $875 million  $194 million

*Reflects trailing 12 months ended Sept. 30, 2020, for Redfin, and
full-year 2020 for RentPath.

                     Transaction Details

The Boards of Directors of both companies have approved the
transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions,
including antitrust approval and approval from a bankruptcy court.
The closing of the transaction is not contingent on financing.
Further details around closing will be forthcoming, at which time
additional organizational and operational details will be
announced.

                         About Redfin

Redfin (www.redfin.com) is a technology-powered residential real
estate company, redefining real estate in the consumer's favor in a
commission-driven industry.  It integrates every step of the home
buying and selling process and pairing its own agents with its own
technology, creating a service that is faster, better and costs
less. Redfin offers brokerage, iBuying, mortgage, and title
services, and it also runs the country's #1 nationwide brokerage
website, offering a host of online tools to consumers, including
the Redfin Estimate.  Redfin represents people buying and selling
homes in over 90 markets in the United States and Canada.  Since
its launch in 2006, Redfin has saved customers over $800 million
and it has helped them buy or sell more than 235,000 homes worth
more than $115 billion.

                   About RentPath Holdings

RentPath is a digital marketing solutions company that empowers
millions nationwide to find apartments and houses for rent.
RentPath operates the Rent.com and ApartmentGuide.com, and
Rentals.com online rental listing platforms.

RentPath Holdings, Inc., and 11 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-10312) on Feb. 12,
2020.

RentPath Holdings was estimated to have $100 million to $500
million in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities as
of the bankruptcy filing.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP and Richards Layton & Finger are serving
as legal counsel, Moelis & Company LLC is serving as a financial
advisor, and Berkeley Research Group, LLC is serving as
restructuring advisor to RentPath.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
agent.

                         *     *     *

Rentpath signed a deal to sell its business to real-estate data
provider CoStar Group Inc. for $600 million but was forced to
terminate the deal in December 2020 after the deal was blocked by
federal antitrust regulators.




REVLON CONSUMER: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa3 CFR
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and other ratings
that are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was
conducted through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9,
2021 in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings
in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Revlon's Caa3 Corporate Family Rating reflects its very high
financial leverage and our belief that high leverage remaining over
the next year elevates risk of a debt restructuring. The rating is
further constrained by weak operating performance, weak liquidity,
potential difficulty in achieving cost cutting initiatives, and
ongoing event risk related to M&F Worldwide/Ron Perelman control.
These constrains have been further exasperated by the coronavirus
pandemic. The rating is supported by a diverse portfolio of
well-known global beauty brands and good geographic
diversification.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.  


REXNORD LLC: S&P Places 'BB' ICR on Watch Neg. on Planned Spin-Off
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on Wisconsin-based
multiplatform industrial company Rexnord LLC, including its 'BB'
issuer credit rating, on CreditWatch with negative implications.

Rexnord announced that it plans to spin-off its process and motion
control (PMC) business and merge it with Regal Beloit Corp. while
retaining its water management (WM) business.

S&P said, "The CreditWatch placement reflects the possibility that
we will lower our ratings on Rexnord because we believe the
transaction will weaken its credit profile given the significant
reduction in its scale, scope, and business diversity, as well as
its heightened exposure to cyclical new commercial and
institutional construction markets.

"The CreditWatch placement reflects our view that the spin-off of
PMC could negatively affect our view of Rexnord's overall credit
quality. We believe the company could face heightened credit risks
due to its significantly smaller scale (revenue and EBITDA will be
reduced by more than half) and reduced scope and product diversity
following the transaction because it will be solely focused on its
WM solutions business. The remaining WM segment will also have an
increased exposure to new nonresidential construction end markets
(close to 47% of segment revenue), which we think can be cyclical.
These risks are balanced by the WM segment's good performance
through the COVID-19 related recession, including an increase in
its sales supported by the demand for the company's expanded
touchless and hygienic products and solutions offerings, as well as
its material proportion of recurring replacement revenue (close to
35%).

"The spin-off of the PMC business and its subsequent merger with
Regal Beloit will be completed via a tax-efficient Reverse Morris
Trust transaction. We expect that Rexnord will redeem all of its
existing debt at the close of the transaction with a combination of
cash from its operations and a dividend from the combined Regal
Beloit/PMC. We expect the company to operate its remaining WM
business under a new capital structure and estimate that Rexnord
LLC will have S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt leverage of close to
its current levels of 2x–3x following the transaction.

"We expect to resolve the CreditWatch negative placement when we
have fully assessed the transaction's effects on the company's
business, its financial position, and the likelihood that it will
close as proposed (currently expected to close in the fourth
quarter of calendar year 2021). Our review will focus on the
remaining business' competitive position, including its scale and
diversity, our expectations for its cash flow and leverage
volatility through a cyclical downturn, as well as its
post-transaction capital structure and financial policy. We expect
to affirm or lower our ratings by one notch. If the transaction is
not consummated, we would most likely affirm our existing ratings
on Rexnord and remove them from CreditWatch."


REYNOLDS CONSUMER: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Ba1 CFR
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Reynolds Consumer Products LLC and other ratings that
are associated with the same analytical unit. The review was
conducted through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9,
2021 in which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings
in the context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Reynolds' Ba1 CFR reflects its solid market position, strong brand
name and mature product categories with stable demand. The company
also has good operating performance, strong free cash flow and very
good liquidity. These strengths are partially offset by the
company's exposure to raw material prices, particularly aluminum
and resin, which can be volatile. Additionally, the company has
limited geographic diversity and high customer concentration.
Reynolds' financial flexibility is constrained by the fully secured
nature of its capital structure. The company's credit profile also
takes into account positive social trends regarding convenience and
negative impact from social trends in reducing waste from
resin-derived products, as well as corporate governance factors
relating to the company's majority ownership by a private investor.
The rating further reflects Moody's expectation that the company's
financial policy will be aggressive with large dividend payments.
Reynolds will have moderately-high financial leverage (debt to
EBITDA). That said, Moody's expects a reasonably conservative
leverage target to guide the use of free cash flow such that
debt-to-EBITDA leverage declines within the next 12 -18 months,
reflecting both debt repayment and modest earnings growth.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


ROBERT F. TAMBONE: Hearing on $31K Sale of Boat Set for March 23
----------------------------------------------------------------
Robert F. Tambone filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts a notice of his private sale of all of
his right, title, and interest in a certain 2018 Boston Whaler 170
Montauk and related personal property ("Boat") to Scott Hohmann or
his nominee for $31,000, subject to higher and better offers.

A telephonic hearing on the Motion is set for March 23, 2021, at
10:45 a.m. (Telephone: (877) 336-1839, Access Code: 1378281#).  The
Objection Deadline is March 10, 2021.

The Boat consists of a 2018 Boston Whaler Montauk 17, a 2018
Mercury Engine and a 2018 Gray Kara Utility Trailer.  Included with
the Boat are various items of personal property, listed as Exhibit
A to the Agreement, with no meaningful value separate from the
Boat, including anchors, chains, ropes, seats and cushions and a
Garmin Echomap.

The Debtor asks Court approval to convey the Boat to the Purchaser.
He intends to sell the Boat free and clear of liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests.  The Boat is to be sold in "as is" and
"where is" condition.  Further, the Debtor is not making any
representations or warranties whatsoever, either express or
implied, with respect to the Boat.

In accordance with the terms of the Sale Agreement, the Purchaser
will pay to the Debtor on the closing date, which will be
approximately two weeks following the entry of an order approving
the sale, the Purchase Price for the Boat, in the amount of$31,000
be paid as follows: (i) $1,000 paid as a deposit; and (ii) $30,000
paid at the time of delivery of the title.

There is a lien by Workers' Credit Union against the Boat and the
trailer.  Any contested liens, claims or encumbrances will attach
to the proceeds of the sale of the Boat.  The validity and
enforceability of any contested lien will be determined by the
Bankruptcy Court after due notice and hearing.

Any and all counteroffers must be in an amount not less than
$34,100.  All counteroffers must be accompanied by a deposit equal
to $3,410, made payable to the Debtor and delivered to the counsel
to the Debtor by March 10, 2021.  The Deposit will be forfeited to
the estate if the highest bidder fails to complete the sale by the
date ordered by the Court.  The Debtor has requested that, if the
sale is not completed by the highest bidder, the Court approves the
sale of the Boat to the next highest bidder.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/5bdowqve from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Robert F. Tambone sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Mass.
Case No. 20-11378) on June 22, 2020.  The Debtor tapped Kathleen
Cruickshank, Esq.



ROCKVILLE TAG: Seeks to Hire Richard B. Rosenblatt as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rockville Auto Tag & Title, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland to employ the Law
Offices of Richard B. Rosenblatt, PC., as its legal counsel.

The firm's services will include advising the Debtor regarding its
powers and duties under the Bankruptcy Code and preparing a Chapter
11 plan of reorganization and other legal papers.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Richard B. Rosenblatt  $350 per hour
     Linda M. Dorney        $350 per hour
     Attorneys              $295 per hour
     Paralegal              $150 per hour

Richard Rosenblatt, Esq., disclosed in court filings that his firm
is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Richard B. Rosenblatt, Esq.
     Linda M. Dorney, Esq.
     The Law Offices of Richard B. Rosenblatt, P.C.
     30 Courthouse Square, Suite 302
     Rockville, MD 20850
     Phone: (301) 838-0098
     Email: rrosenblatt@rosenblattlaw.com

                 About Rockville Auto Tag & Title

Rockville, Md-based Rockville Auto Tag & Title, LLC is a private,
MVA licensed company that issues Maryland auto tag and auto title
registrations for all vehicles.

Rockville Auto Tag & Title filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
21-10879) on Feb. 12, 2021.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
between $100,001 and $500,000.  

The Law Offices of Richard B. Rosenblatt is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


RODAN & FIELDS: Moody's Completes Review, Retains Caa2 CFR
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Rodan & Fields, LLC and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Rodan + Fields' Caa2 CFR reflects its narrow focus in skin care,
high and increasing competition from larger and better capitalized
competitors, and limited geographic diversity. Products are
somewhat discretionary and vulnerable to consumer spending
pullbacks and focused largely within the skin care segment. The
company's credit profile is also vulnerable to the fundamental
risks related to the direct selling business model, such as
declines in enrollment of new independent sales consultants. Adding
new distribution channels provides potential expansion
opportunities for the company's products, but also the need to
execute any such initiatives while maintaining the attractiveness
of the current independent sales model. The company's credit
profile is supported by its good brand name recognition in niche
markets and moderate financial leverage prior to recent operating
difficulties and the coronavirus outbreak. Moody's also view skin
care as a more resilient subsector of the beauty category relative
to other products such as cosmetics and fragrances.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


RTECH FABRICATIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Rtech Fabrications, LLC
        520 W Dalton Avenue
        Coeur D Alene, ID 83815

Business Description: Rtech Fabrications, LLC --
                      https://www.rtechfabrications.com -- is a
                      restoration shop specializing in 67-72 GM
                      trucks.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Idaho

Case No.: 21-20048

Judge: Hon. Noah G. Hillen

Debtor's Counsel: Bruce A. Anderson, Esq.
                  ELSAESSER ANDERSON, CHTD.
                  320 East Neider Avenue
                  Suite 102
                  Coer D Alene, ID 83815
                  Tel: (208) 667-2900
                  Fax: (208) 667-2150
                  Email: brucea@eaidaho.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Randall T. Robertson, managing member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free  at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/WY2GZWY/Rtech_Fabrications_LLC__idbke-21-20048__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


RUBY TUESDAY: Plan Approved After Deal With Landlords
-----------------------------------------------------
Leslie A. Pappas of Bloomberg Law reports that Ruby Tuesday's
bankrupt parent won court approval of its Chapter 11 reorganization
plan after resolving last-minute objections from its landlords over
how the plan would affect their leases.

The amended plan approved Feb. 17, 2021, transfers equity in the
company to two of its secured lenders, units of TCW Group Inc. and
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

TCW will assume a majority ownership stake in the restaurant
business and will manage 210 Ruby Tuesday restaurants that will
remain open. Goldman Sachs will get an indirect ownership interest
in the RT Lodge, a restaurant and corporate event venue located on
the campus of Maryville.

                   About RTI Holding Company

RTI Holding Company, LLC and its affiliates develop, operate, and
franchise casual dining restaurants in the United States, Guam, and
five foreign countries under the Ruby Tuesday brand. The
company-owned and operated restaurants (i.e. non-franchise) are
concentrated primarily in the Southeast, Northeast, Mid-Atlantic
and Midwest regions of the United States.

On Oct. 7, 2020, RTI Holding Company and its affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 20-12456).  At the time of the filing, the Debtors
disclosed assets of between $100 million and $500 million and
liabilities of the same range.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the cases.

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP and CR3 Partners LLC serve as the
Debtors' legal counsel and financial advisor respectively.  Epiq
Corporate Restructuring LLC is the claims, noticing and
solicitation agent and administrative advisor.

On Oct. 26, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for the District of Delaware
appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors in the
chapter 11 cases.  The committee tapped Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP and Cole Schotz P.C. as counsel and FTI Consulting,
Inc. as financial advisor.


S&S HOLDINGS: Moody's Assigns First Time B3 Corp. Family Rating
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to S&S
Holdings, LLC ("S&S", initially "Orange Merger Sub, LLC") including
a B3 corporate family rating and a B3-PD probability of default
rating. In addition, Moody's assigned a B2 rating to S&S' proposed
$600 million first lien term loan and a Caa1 rating on the proposed
$200 million second lien term loan. The outlook is stable. The
proceeds will be used to complete the acquisition of S&S by
Clayton, Dubilier & Rice. Moody's ratings and outlook are subject
to receipt and review of final documentation.

The B3 CFR assignment incorporates governance considerations given
the company's private equity ownership and high pro forma leverage
post-acquisition with debt/EBITDA greater than 7x for the LTM
period ending November 30, 2020. Private equity owners tend to have
aggressive financial strategies favoring high leverage with a
higher potential for dividend recapitalizations and the pursuit of
debt financed acquisitions. The rating also reflects the
competitive nature of the apparel distribution industry which is
also exposed to macroeconomic cycles and Moody's view of high
supplier concentration. However, the rating is supported by the
company's growing market position, geographic footprint in the
United States and Canada and low customer concentration.

Assignments:

Issuer: S&S Holdings, LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term Loan, Assigned Caa1 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: S&S Holdings, LLC

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

S&S' B3 CFR is constrained by its high pro forma leverage following
the close of the transaction, high supplier concentration and the
competitive nature of the apparel distribution industry. The rating
is also constrained by the company's exposure to cyclicality in the
industry and its private equity ownership which tend to have
aggressive financial strategies.

The rating is supported by S&S' strong and growing market position
in a niche category, low customer concentration and broad
geographic footprint in the United States and Canada which allows
its product to reach the vast majority of the US in 1 to 2 business
days. The rating is also supported by the company's good interest
coverage and asset-lite business model.

The company has significantly increased its sales since 2017 due to
increased volumes as well as its acquisition of Techno Sport in
January 2020 which expands its footprint to Canada. The company has
also recently enhanced its margins with management implemented
initiatives. S&S has also implemented strategies that allow for
optimized inventory investment. The company expects to sustain the
margin and working capital enhancements which should improve
earnings and free cash flow.

The stable outlook reflects the expectation of adequate liquidity
and that S&S will deleverage through earnings growth as it benefits
from sales growth and enhanced margins.

S&S' adequate liquidity reflects its low cash balance and its
proposed $225 million ABL revolving credit facility which is
expected to be undrawn at close but will be utilized for working
capital needs. Free cash flow in 2020 was positive after prior
periods with negative free cash flow due to investments made in the
business. 2020 free cash flow was also enhanced by lower than
normal inventory levels at year end due to manufacturer supply
constraints. 2021 cash flow is expected to be negative as the
company builds its inventory back to normal levels. The majority of
the inventory build will be funded by selling shareholders either
prior to transaction close or at transaction close as stipulated in
the transaction agreement. The free cash flow volatility is
expected to be reduced going forward as management has implemented
inventory efficiency initiatives which will result in a lower level
of working capital investment. The credit facility contains a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1x that is tested when the
revolver availability is less than 10% of the line cap. The company
is expected to remain in compliance with the covenant.

The credit facilities are expected to contain covenant flexibility
for transactions that could adversely affect creditors, including
incremental first lien facility capacity up to the sum of (a) the
greater of $130 million and 100% of pro forma consolidated adjusted
EBITDA plus (b) 4.65x total first lien secured net leverage (for
first lien secured debt); and incremental second lien facility
capacity up to the sum of (a) the greater of $35 million and 25% of
pro forma consolidated adjusted EBITDA, plus (b) 6.15x total
secured net leverage. Alternatively, the ratio tests can all be
satisfied so long as leverage does not increase on a pro forma
basis if incurred in connection with a permitted acquisition or
investment. An amount up to the greater of $65 million and 50% of
pro forma EBITDA may be incurred with an earlier maturity than the
existing debt. The credit facilities also include: provisions
allowing the transfer of assets to unrestricted subsidiaries, with
no additional "blocker" provisions restricting such transfers; the
requirement that only wholly-owned subsidiaries act as subsidiary
guarantors, raising the risk that guarantees may be released
following a partial change in ownership; step downs for first lien
loans in the asset sale prepayment requirement to 50% and 0% based
on achieving reductions to the first lien net leverage ratio of
4.15x and 3.65x, respectively; and step downs for second lien loans
in the asset sale prepayment requirement to 50% and 0% based on
achieving reductions to the total secured net leverage ratio of
5.65x and 5.15x, respectively.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be downgraded if S&S' liquidity, operating
performance or vendor relationships deteriorate. Quantitatively,
the ratings could be downgraded if debt/EBITDA is maintained above
6.5x or EBITA/interest expense declines below 1.25x.

The ratings could be upgraded if revenues and earnings improve
materially, resulting in solid positive free cash flow.
Quantitatively, the ratings could be upgraded if the company
maintains debt/EBITDA below 5.5x, and EBITA/interest expense above
2x.

Headquartered in Bolingbrook, Illinois, S&S is a distributor of
blank apparel from retail brands to imprintable apparel customers.
Revenue for the LTM period ending September 30, 2020 was
approximately $1.3 billion. Following the close of the transaction,
Clayton, Dubilier & Rice will be the majority owner.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.


S&S HOLDINGS: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issuer credit rating to S&S
Activewear (S&S), a Bolingbrook, Ill.-based distributor of
imprintable apparel serving decorators and promotional product
distributors, the borrower of the proposed debt. S&P also assigned
its 'B-' issue-level and '3' recovery ratings to the proposed
first-lien debt facilities and its 'CCC' issue-level rating and '6'
recovery rating to the second-lien term loan.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that, over the next
12 months, S&S will benefit from good operating performance as
supported by volume growth, increased market share, and expansion
of the brand portfolio leveraging its fulfillment expertise. This
should allow the company to improve its S&P Global Ratings-adjusted
debt to EBITDA to the 6x area in fiscal 2021, from the mid-8x
expected pro forma for the transaction at fiscal year-end 2020.

S&P's rating on S&S incorporates the following key risks and
strengths.

Key rating risks:

-- High starting debt leverage (forecast at about the mid-8x area
as of fiscal 2020), pro forma for the transaction and S&P's
expectation that leverage will remain elevated over the next 12-18
months.

-- Narrow business focus and high revenue concentration in the
cyclical U.S. imprintable apparel industry, which is characterized
by high price-competition and fragmentation.

-- Risk of re-leveraging through a consolidation growth strategy
and the potential for changing U.S. tariff policies or other input,
commodity, and freight cost headwinds.

-- Threat of disintermediation from industry participants remains
a tail risk.

Key strengths include:

-- A strong market position within the U.S. imprintable apparel
sub-sector that enables the company to meet unique customer
stock-keeping unit (SKU) specifications.

-- Well-established sourcing model and distribution footprint that
is positioned for growth leveraging its proprietary information
technology (IT) infrastructure.

-- Long-tenured customer relationships with recurring demand
patterns; and

-- Good free operating cash flow (FOCF) generation forecast at
about $30 million-$40 million over the next 12 months despite
intra-year working capital needs, which can be up to about $20
million-$25 million, related to potential inventory builds.

S&P said, "Our rating reflects our view that S&S Activewear will
maintain S&P Global Ratings-adjusted debt leverage well above 5x
over the next 12 months. Given the fragmented nature of the market,
sticky customer relationships, and distribution network, industry
consolidation is an attractive path for S&S to scale its platform
and earnings, though acquisitions have the potential to delay the
company's deleveraging trajectory. S&S has increased its scale over
the past few years by strategically acquiring entities to develop
its distribution network across the U.S., with the most recent
acquisition in 2020 providing access to the Canadian market. The
company's historical investments in its infrastructure offers the
capability to handle much greater volume, thereby further
increasing the benefits of a consolidating growth strategy. Due to
the uncertainty of the timing and size of acquisitions, we do not
incorporate any into our base case forecast. We expect S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to be in the 6x area, with free
operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt in the mid-single-digit area for
fiscal 2021.

"We expect S&S will maintain stable operating performance as it
leverages its IT infrastructure to scale the business. The company
has a relatively small scale and narrow service offering within the
imprintable apparel industry, which is characterized by low
barriers to entry. The market is highly fragmented, mostly
comprising of smaller, regional firms that highlight the
competitive industry dynamics. However, the company does compete
with large service providers such as SanMar and Alphabroder, and we
expect competition to increase as the industry consolidates." While
S&S has grown from a small regional apparel distributor only
serving the U.S. Midwest to one of the three largest U.S. providers
in the about $9 billion imprintable apparel industry, about 80% of
total sales are concentrated in the t-shirt and fleece categories.
However, the company does benefit from limited fashion risk as the
inventory has a low risk of obsolescence with products that are not
customized or decorated. S&S's vast product line (more than 80,000
SKUs) from over 100 brand manufacturers, along with a diversified
customer base with the top 10 customers accounting for less than
15% of sales for the last 12 months ended Nov. 30, 2020, along with
its brand equity displayed by its high net promoter score (NPS)
compared with its peers, partially offset the niche focus of the
business.

Despite the commoditized nature of the products, the company
successfully expanded gross margins in 2020, leveraging its ability
to offer a faster turnaround time on order fulfillment. S&S offers
1-2 day shipping nationwide--a notable factor in the customer's
decision-making process as its clients do not hold any inventory
and rely on industry participants like S&S as sourcing partners.
The company's logistics capabilities, including inventory
optimization using real-time sales, forecasting supply and demand
by product and channel, and facility automation to enhance
efficiency should further drive margin expansion as the business
scales. S&P expects S&P Adjusted EBITDA margins to expand to the
high-single-digit area, partially attributed to low double-digit
revenue growth in 2021 as it laps a slower fiscal 2020, affected by
the COVID-19 pandemic on both the sales and supply side in the
second quarter. Despite the softening in the second quarter of
fiscal 2020, sales rebounded in the third and fourth quarter, with
revenue growth for fiscal 2020 expected to be in the low
double-digit area, partially offset by the softer sales rebound
from S&S's Canadian subsidiary Technosport (acquired in 2020).

The industry's exposure to cyclical changes in the economy, along
with a threat of disintermediation, are key risks. S&P said, "We
view the imprintable apparel industry as cyclical because nearly
65% of the end-user demand is attributable to corporate
discretionary spending. In periods of uncertainty, or economic
declines, marketing spending is often one of the first expense
categories that is curtailed. Although a meaningful amount of the
end-user demand is attributable to individual customers--a growing
segment that is catered by e-decorators and e-retailers, spurred by
the recent e-commerce trends--we believe that macroeconomic factors
such as high unemployment and inflation can affect demand
prospects. In the last recession, sales declined by the low single
digits, albeit S&S was a much smaller business with limited
distribution capabilities." Partially offsetting this factor is the
size of the business, which insulates it from periods of lower
demand compared with smaller regional participants.

S&S's role in the value chain has been cemented over the past few
years, largely due to the limited ability of manufacturers to
efficiently pick up small orders and offer delivery on a
cost-effective basis. Despite a direct to consumer model being
attractive from a margin perspective compared with the wholesale
distribution model, this would require a structural shift by
certain manufacturers (for example Columbia and Adidas--S&S
suppliers) to present a meaningful risk to S&S. However, larger
distributors or decorators--S&S' current customer base--could
integrate backwards and hold inventory in certain situations
depending on the order size and expected margin. The likes of
Amazon--while not currently engaging in the aforementioned
initiative, could very well do so given its distribution
capabilities. That being said, S&P sees the threat of
disintermediation from well-capitalized players, a tail risk to the
industry.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that, over
the next 12 months, S&S will benefit from good operating
performance as supported by volume growth, increased market share,
and expansion of the brand portfolio leveraging its fulfillment
expertise. This should allow the company to improve its S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA to the 6x area in fiscal 2021, down
from about the mid-8x area expected pro forma for the transaction
at fiscal year-end 2020.

"Although unlikely, over the next 12 months, we could lower our
rating if operating performance declined such that operating cash
flow turned negative and its liquidity position weakened. We
estimate this could occur if the macroeconomic environment worsened
or the company experienced increased competition or logistical
issues in the fulfillment of orders. In addition, we could lower
our rating if we deemed the capital structure to be unsustainable.

"More likely, over the next year, we could raise our ratings if the
company were to apply excess cash flow toward debt reduction such
that adjusted debt to EBITA declined and remained below 6x, along
with an FOCF-to-debt ratio in the mid- to high-single digits on a
sustained basis. An upgrade would also be contingent on our belief
that the financial sponsor would maintain a conservative financial
policy, allowing the company to maintain leverage at these levels
with minimal risk of releveraging. We could also raise our ratings
if the company were to build scale and improve diversity and
barriers to entry to an extent material enough to result in a
better business risk profile."


SANUWAVE HEALTH: Accounting Error Found in Form 10-Q Report
-----------------------------------------------------------
The audit committee of the board of directors was made aware of and
with management of SANUWAVE Health, Inc., concluded that the
Company's previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020, should
no longer be relied upon because of an error in the Company's
accounting relating to the Company's warrant derivative liability
for such quarter.

In the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020,
the Company reported a total non-current warrant derivative
liability amount of approximately $2.8 million.  As a result of the
accounting error, the Company underreported the amount of such
liability, and the Company will file its Form 10-Q to correct the
total non-current warrant derivative liability amount for such
quarter and to establish a current warrant derivative liability
amount for such quarter.  The Company is in the process of
analyzing and quantifying the adjustments that will be reflected in
such Form 10-Q/A.  The error relates to the determination of the
number of shares of common stock subject to a warrant issued by the
Company in June 2020 as previously reported by the Company, which
warrant contains certain anti-dilution adjustment provisions with
respect to subsequent issuances of securities by the Company at a
price below the exercise price of such warrant In the Company's
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2020, the Company's
financial statements reflected that the number of shares underlying
such warrant was 1.75 million shares and the exercise price of such
warrant was $0.20 per share, but as a result of certain dilutive
issuances during the third quarter of 2020, the Company's financial
statements should have reflected that the number of shares
underlying such warrant was 35 million shares and the exercise
price of such warrant was $0.01 per share as of quarter ended Sept.
30, 2020.

The accounting error is non-cash and does not impact the Company's
revenue, operating expenses, operating income, cash flows or cash
and cash equivalents as previously reported.

The audit committee of the board of directors and management of the
Company have discussed the foregoing matter with the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm, Marcum LLP.  The
Company will file a Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended Sept. 30,
2020 to correct the error in the financial statements as soon as
practicable.  The Company's management, the Audit Committee and the
full Board of Directors intend to review the effectiveness of the
Company's internal controls over financial reporting and its
disclosure controls and procedures in the course of completing the
restatement process.  The Company will amend any disclosures
pertaining to its evaluation of such controls and procedures as
appropriate in connection with future filings.

                       About SANUWAVE Health

Headquartered in Suwanee, Georgia, SANUWAVE Health, Inc.
(OTCQB:SNWV) -- http://www.SANUWAVE.com-- is a shockwave
technology company initially focused on the development and
commercialization of patented noninvasive, biological response
activating devices for the repair and regeneration of skin,
musculoskeletal tissue and vascular structures.  SANUWAVE's
portfolio of regenerative medicine products and product candidates
activate biologic signaling and angiogenic responses, producing new
vascularization and microcirculatory improvement, which helps
restore the body's normal healing processes and regeneration.
SANUWAVE applies its patented PACE technology in wound healing,
orthopedic/spine, plastic/cosmetic and cardiac conditions.  Its
lead product candidate for the global wound care market, dermaPACE,
is US FDA cleared for the treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.  The
device is also CE Marked throughout Europe and has device license
approval for the treatment of the skin and subcutaneous soft tissue
in Canada, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand.  SANUWAVE
researches, designs, manufactures, markets and services its
products worldwide, and believes it has demonstrated that its
technology is safe and effective in stimulating healing in chronic
conditions of the foot (plantar fasciitis) and the elbow (lateral
epicondylitis) through its U.S. Class III PMA approved OssaTron
device, as well as stimulating bone and chronic tendonitis
regeneration in the musculoskeletal environment through the
utilization of its OssaTron, Evotron and orthoPACE devices in
Europe, Asia and Asia/Pacific.  In addition, there are
license/partnership opportunities for SANUWAVE's shockwave
technology for non-medical uses, including energy, water, food and
industrial markets.

SANUWAVE reported a net loss of $10.43 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $11.63 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2020, the Company had
$32.87 million in total assets, $33.74 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $873,002.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, the Company's auditor since 2018,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
30, 2020 citing that the Company has a significant working capital
deficiency, has incurred significant losses and needs to raise
additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


SHREE MADHAV: Selling Laundry Business to Pennington for $325K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Shree Madhav Laundry, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey to authorize the sale of its laundromat
business located at 359 Pennington Avenue, in Trenton, New Jersey,
to Pennington Laundry Depot, LLC, for $325,000, under the terms of
the Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated Feb. 12, 2021.

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 11, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.

The sale will be free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances, with valid liens to attach to proceeds of sale.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/1b63zb3x from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About Shree Madhav Laundry

Shree Madhav Laundry, LLC, is a laundromat with a primary business
address of 359 Pennington Avenue, Trenton, New Jersey.

Shree Madhav Laundry, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 20-20449) on Sept. 10, 2020, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by The Kelly Firm, P.C.



SIMMONS FOODS: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Rates New $750M Notes B3
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service, Inc. affirmed the ratings of Simmons
Foods, Inc., including the B2 Corporate Family Rating, B2-PD
Probability of Default Rating, B1 secured first-lien debt and B3
secured second-lien debt ratings. Moody's also assigned a B3 rating
to Simmons' new $750 million 8-year second-lien notes being
offered. Finally, Moody's revised the outlook to stable from
negative.

The proposed $750 million notes due 2029 will be used to partially
fund the redemption of the company's $250 million 7.75% first-lien
notes due January 2024 and $550 million 5.75% second-lien notes due
November 2024. The remaining amount of the refinancing, including a
$25 million call premium and other transaction fees, will be funded
through borrowing $88 million under an upsized, previously undrawn
ABL revolving credit facility. As part of the transaction, the ABL
facility is being increased in size from $195 million to $350
million and the tenor is being extended by three years from a 2023
to a 2026 maturity. Separately, the company will draw an additional
$25 million under the ABL facility to fund a dividend, resulting in
ABL loans totaling $113 million at closing.

Notwithstanding the resulting approximate $60 million increase in
debt, the proposed transactions are a credit positive overall
because they will reduce the company's annual cash interest costs,
increase external sources of liquidity and materially extend debt
maturities.

The outlook revision to stable from negative reflects, in part, the
successful completion last year of the two-year construction and
startup of the company's $225 million poultry processing facility
in Benton County, Arkansas that replaced a near-by aging facility.
The new plant, along with other capital projects, caused
debt/EBITDA (based on Moody's analytic adjustments) to rise as high
as 6.5x in 2018 and resulted in negative free cash flow for two
years. Simmons has since reduced debt/EBITDA to approximately 4.5x
at the end of 2020 and should be able to make further improvement
in 2021. However, Moody's expects that free cash flow will be
negligible at best over the next few years as the company is likely
to reinvest all of its operating cash flow, internally and
externally, to fund growth investments.

The stable outlook also reflects the solid growth and increasing
earnings stability contributed in recent years by Simmons' pet food
operations, which currently represent 47% of sales and 66% of
EBITDA. Over the past year, stronger performance in pet food has
mostly offset weakness in the poultry business that has suffered
due to coronavirus-related disruptions and shutdowns. Moody's
expects that these two core segments, which have partially
integrated supply chains, will continue to provide complementary
diversification benefits, including enhanced earnings stability.

Moody's took the following rating actions on Simmons Foods, Inc.:

New Assignments:

Issuer: Simmons Foods, Inc.

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Notes, Assigned B3 (LGD4)

Ratings Affirmed:

Issuer: Simmons Foods, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Senior Secured 1st Lien Notes, Affirmed B1 (LGD3)

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Notes, Affirmed B3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Simmons Foods, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

Simmons' liquidity is good. As of the end of fiscal 2020, Simmons'
had near-full availability under its $195 million ABL revolver and
Moody's expects that the company will have at least $210 million of
availability under the proposed upsized ABL over the next 15
months.

The B3 rating on the proposed $750 million senior secured
second-lien notes is one notch below the B2 Corporate Family
Rating. This reflects the lien subordination of these instruments
to collateral pledged to the company's proposed $350 million senior
secured ABL revolving credit facility.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Simmons' B2 Corporate Family Rating reflects the high (>50%)
sales concentration in the earnings volatile poultry processing
sector, high financial leverage and a recent history of negative
free cash flow due to heavy capital spending. Moody's believes that
the company has flexibility to pull back on capital spending and to
generate positive free cash if needed to support liquidity, but
that the preference is reinvestment to bolster growth and enhance
profitability. The rating is supported by Simmons' good liquidity
and the increasingly effective natural hedge provided by its
integrated pet food and chicken processing operations.

Simmons' exposure to environment risk is moderate. Moody's consider
environmental risk to be material to the overall credit profile of
companies within the protein sector. Moody's incorporate risks of
direct environmental hazards — the impacts of pollution, water
shortages, climate change and natural or human-caused disasters --
and Moody's may consider such aspects as liability, clean-up costs,
capital costs, and carbon regulations to prevent or remediate these
risks.

Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its
ESG framework, given the substantial implications for public health
and safety. Simmons is moderately exposed to social risk. Rising
consumer concerns about health and wellness, animal welfare,
sustainable farming practices, and labor conditions can cause
demand shifts in protein categories, which are also prone to
episodes of product contamination and animal disease.

Simmons' governance profile is relatively weak, characterized by
concentrated ownership and executive control by the Simmons family,
sustained high financial leverage, and a mixed track record of
meeting company forecasts. Unfavorable variances against plans
reflect inherent sector volatility that the company has not
consistently anticipated, a mixed track record in implementing
large-scale capital projects, and an aggressive growth strategy
that partly relies on speculative investments. Positively, Moody's
believe that the Simmons family is committed to protecting and
sustainably growing its highly valued enterprise and significant
generational wealth, which is largely in line with creditors'
interests. In addition, cash distributions are generally limited to
tax related shareholder needs.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Simmons' ratings could be lowered if overall operating performance
deteriorates significantly or if future major capital projects and
acquisitions fail to translate into commensurately stronger
earnings and operating cash flow. Quantitatively, if debt/EBITDA is
likely to be sustained above 4.5x, or the company's liquidity
deteriorates, the ratings could be downgraded.

Simmons' ratings could be upgraded if the company is able to
establish a track record of stable operating performance and
positive free cash flow. Additionally, debt/EBITDA would have to
approach 3.0x before Moody's would consider a rating upgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Protein and
Agriculture published in May 2019.

Simmons Foods, Inc. and affiliates, headquartered in Siloam
Springs, Arkansas, is a vertically integrated poultry processor,
and the largest private label manufacturer of canned pet food in
North America. The company generates sales through three primary
business groups: Poultry (53% before eliminations); Pet Food (38%);
and Animal Nutrition (9%). The company is principally owned and
controlled by members of the Simmons family. Net sales reported for
fiscal year 2020 totaled approximately $2 billion.


SIMMONS FOODS: S&P Rates Proposed $750MM Second-Lien Notes 'B'
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level and '4' recovery
ratings to the proposed $750 million senior secured second-lien
notes maturing 2029 to be issued by Simmons Foods Inc., Simmons
Prepared Foods Inc., Simmons Pet Food Inc.,Simmons Feed Ingredients
Inc. and Simmons Foods intends to upsize its asset-based lending
revolving credit facility (ABL revolver) to $350 million from $195
million (maturing in 2026; not rated).

The proposed second-lien notes, combined with $113 million of
borrowings on its proposed upsized ABL revolver, will redeem the
company's existing 7.750% senior secured notes due 2024 and 5.750%
second-lien senior secured notes due 2024, pay a $25 million
distribution to shareholders, and pay other transaction-related
expenses. S&P estimates pro forma leverage for this transaction
will be near 5x (including its adjustments for operating leases).

S&P's 'B' issuer credit rating and stable outlook on Simmons Foods
are unchanged.

Issue Ratings--Recovery Analysis

Key analytical factors

S&P said, "We are revising our recovery analysis to include the
company's proposed debt issuances. We are increasing our enterprise
valuation, given the company's successful integration of previously
acquired businesses and the completion of growth-oriented capital
expenditure (capex) programs. Our analysis also reflects the
favorable demand outlook in the company's pet segment. This more
favorable business outlook is underpinned by the significant
increase in the U.S. pet population, which we believe will lead to
a permanent increase in the addressable market."

The debt capital structure consists of:

-- $350 million ABL revolver due 2026 (not rated); and
-- $750 million proposed second-lien term loan due 2029.

Simulated default assumptions

Simmons Foods is organized in Siloam Springs, Ark., and
substantially all of its obligations, assets, and operations are
located in the U.S. In the event of a payment default, we believe
the company would file for bankruptcy protection under the
administration of the U.S. bankruptcy court system, while entities
abroad, if any, would remain out of any insolvency proceedings with
respect to local jurisdictions.

S&P said, "We believe creditors would receive maximum recovery in a
payment default scenario if the company reorganized instead of
liquidated. This is because of the company's position as the
sixth-largest private-label pet food producer in North America.
Therefore, in evaluating the recovery prospects for debtholders, we
assume the company continues as a going concern. We arrive at our
emergence enterprise value by applying a 5.5x multiple to our
assumed emergence EBITDA.

"Our simulated default scenario assumes a payment default in the
second half of 2024 as the result of a steep decline in operating
performance because of a combination of very high feed costs,
excess poultry supplies, and a significant manufacturing
disruption. The company may have to fund cash flow shortfalls with
available cash. Under such a scenario, its EBITDA would decline
such that the company could not meet its maintenance capex and debt
service obligations, leading to a payment default and bankruptcy
filing.

"As such, we have valued the company based on an enterprise value
to derive recovery and applied an assumed distressed emergence
EBITDA of $111 million against a 5.5x multiple to estimate a gross
recovery value of $610.7 million. To determine net recovery value
available for distribution to creditors, we reduced our estimate of
gross recovery value by 5% to account for estimated bankruptcy
administrative expenses. This results in net recovery value of
about $580 million that is available for distribution to the ABL
revolver and then to the senior secured second-lien notes."

Calculation of EBITDA at emergence:

-- Debt service: $58.9 million (default-year interest)
-- Maintenance capex: $37.3 million
-- Default EBITDA proxy: $96.1 million
-- Cyclicality adjustment/operational adjustment: 10%/5%
-- Emergence EBITDA: $111 million

Simplified waterfall

-- Emergence EBITDA: $111 million

-- Multiple: 5.5x

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $580.1
million

-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 95%/5%

-- Collateral value available to secured debt claims: $570
million

-- Priority debt claims: $218 million

-- Collateral value available to senior secured second-lien debt
claims: $352.1 million

    --Second-lien recovery: 30%-50%; rounded estimate: 45%


SINALOENCE FOOD: Seeks to Hire Michael Jay Berger as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Sinaloence Food Products & Services, Inc. seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to
hire the Law Offices of Michael Jay Berger as its legal counsel.

The firm will render these legal services:

     (a) communicate with creditors of the Debtor;

     (b) review the Debtor's bankruptcy schedules;

     (c) advise the Debtor of its legal rights and obligations in a
bankruptcy proceeding;

     (d) work to bring the Debtor into full compliance with
reporting requirements of the Office of the United States Trustee;

     (e) prepare status reports as required by the court; and

     (f) respond to any motions filed in the Debtor's bankruptcy
proceeding.

The firm will be paid at these rates:

     Michael Jay Berger               $595 per hour
     Sofya Davtyan                    $495 per hour
     Mark Domeyer                     $495 per hour
     Debra Reed                       $435 per hour
     Carolyn M. Afari                 $435 per hour
     Samuel Boyamian                  $350 per hour
     Senior Paralegals and Law Clerks $225 per hour
     Bankruptcy Paralegals            $200 per hour

In addition, the firm will seek reimbursement for its expenses.

The retainer fee is $18,000.

Michael Jay Berger, Esq., disclosed in court filings that his firm
is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Michael Jay Berger, Esq.
     Law Offices of Michael Jay Berger
     9454 Wilshire Blvd., 6th Floor
     Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2929
     Telephone: (310) 271-6223
     Facsimile: (310) 271-9805
     Email: michael.bergerbankruptcypower.com

             About Sinaloence Food Products & Services

Sinaloence Food Products & Services, Inc. is a single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Sinaloence Food Products & Services filed its voluntary petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 21-10255) on Jan. 14, 2021.  At the time of filing,
the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
$500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.

Judge Sheri Bluebond oversees the case.  Joanne P. Sanchez, Esq.,
at JD Law, serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


SOUND HOUSING: Case Summary & 18 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Sound Housing LLC
        520 10th Ave
        Kirkland, WA 98033

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Washington

Case No.: 21-10341

Judge: Hon. Marc Barreca

Debtor's Counsel: Jacob D DeGraaff, Esq.
                  HENRY & DEGRAAFF, P.S.
                  787 Maynard Ave S
                  Seattle, WA 98104
                  Tel: (206) 330-0595
                  E-mail: jacobd@hdm-legal.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Tatiana Gershanovich, managing member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free  at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/EQPUDLI/Sound_Housing_LLC__wawbke-21-10341__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


SOUTHLAND ROYALTY: $251.7M Sale to Wamsutter to Fund Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
Southland Royalty Company LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization
and a corresponding Disclosure Statement on Feb. 16, 2021.

The Debtor's Restructuring Committee has approved the Plan and
believes it is in the best interests of the Debtor's estate.  As
such, the Debtor recommends that all holders of claims entitled to
vote accept the Plan by returning their ballots no later than April
26, 2021, at 4:00 p.m.  Assuming the requisite acceptances to the
Plan are obtained, the Debtor will seek the Court's approval of the
Plan at the confirmation hearing on May 12, 2021, at 10:00 a.m.

If consummated, the Plan provides for the Debtor to sell
substantially all of its assets to Wamsutter E&P, LLC (the
"Purchaser") in exchange for approximately $251.7 million in
aggregate consideration, comprised of (a) a cash purchase price of
approximately $148.0 million, subject to certain adjustments
described in the Purchase Agreement, (b) assumption by the
Purchaser of certain liabilities associated with plugging and
abandonment with an estimated PV10 value of approximately $102.4
million, and (c) payment of any third party cure costs for those
agreements the Purchaser elects to have assumed and assigned to it,
anticipated to be approximately $1.3 million, all as set forth in
the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the Debtor and the
Purchaser and related documents.

Approximately $48 million of the cash purchase price will be
applied to pay Cure Costs arising from the assumption of certain
midstream agreements with affiliates of the Purchaser.  The net
cash proceeds of the Sale Transaction will be used to fund
distributions under the Plan. The primary objective of the Plan is
to maximize the value of recoveries to all Holders of Allowed
Claims and to distribute all property of the Debtor's Estate that
is or becomes available for distribution, in accordance with the
priorities established by the Bankruptcy Code and applicable law.

Generally speaking, the Plan provides for:

     * consummation of the Sale Transaction;

     * the full and final resolution of all pre- and post-petition
funded debt obligations of the Debtor;

     * estimation of the total potential amount of secured M&M
Claims;

     * full payment to Holders of Allowed General Administrative
Claims, Priority Tax Claims, DIP Facility Claims, Professional Fee
Claims, Other Priority Claims and Other Secured Claims;

     * distribution to Holders of General Unsecured Claims of the
GUC Guaranteed Distribution Amount, 16% of the Sage Grouse Lease
Proceeds, and 100% of Proceeds of Retained Causes of Action;

     * implementation of the RBL Plan Settlement pursuant to which
the Holders of Prepetition RBL Claims are agreeing to waive certain
claims resulting from the diminution in value of collateral, and
subordinate the Prepetition RBL Deficiency Claim to the GUC
Guaranteed Distribution Amount and GUC Sage Grouse Proceeds in
order to resolve and settle any and all challenges to the
Prepetition RBL Claims and related liens, including those asserted
in the Committee Lien Avoidance Complaint;

     * a Liquidating Trust to hold and liquidate certain assets for
the benefit of creditors; and

     * a Wind-Down Amount and designation of a Plan Administrator
to wind down the Debtor's business and affairs; pay and reconcile
Claims as provided in the Plan; and administer the Plan and the
Reorganized Debtor, including certain assets vesting in the
Reorganized Debtor to be liquidated for the benefit of creditors,
in an effective and efficient manner.

The Plan still has blanks as to the projected percentage recovery
for holders of Class 3 Prepetition RBL Secured Claims totaling
$485.3 million and Class 4 General Unsecured Claims totaling $77
million.

The Plan provides for the Sale Transaction, the liquidation of all
assets thereafter remaining, and the distribution of the proceeds
of the foregoing to the Holders of Allowed Claims.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 16, 2021,
is available at https://bit.ly/3s6LnfK from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     M. Blake Cleary
     Sean M. Beach
     Elizabeth S. Justison
     S. Alexander Faris
     Rodney Square
     1000 North King Street
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Phone: (302) 571-6600
     Fax: (302) 571-1253
     E-mail: mbcleary@ycst.com
             sbeach@ycst.com
             afaris@ycst.com
             ejustison@ycst.com

         - and –

     C. Luckey McDowell
     Ian E. Roberts
     2828 N. Harwood Street, Suite 1800
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Phone: (214) 271-5777
     E-mail: luckey.mcdowell@shearman.com
             ian.roberts@shearman.com

         - and –
    
     Sara Coelho
     Jonathan M. Dunworth
     599 Lexington Avenue
     New York, NY 10022
     Phone: (212) 848-4000
     Email: sara.coelho@shearman.com
      jonathan.dunworth@shearman.com

                     About Southland Royalty

Southland Royalty Company LLC -- http://www.southlandroyaltyco.com/
-- is a privately held independent exploration and production
company engaged in the acquisition and development of hydrocarbons.
Headquartered in Fort Worth, Southland Royalty Company conducts its
business across four states, with the majority of operations in
Wyoming and New Mexico. Southland Royalty Company was formed
principally to produce and extract hydrocarbons in the Wamsutter
field of the Green River Basin and in the San Juan Basin.

Southland Royalty Company sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Del. Case No. 20-10158) on Jan. 27, 2020.  In the petition signed
by CRO Frank A. Pometti, the Debtor was estimated to have $100
million to $500 million in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in
liabilities.

The Debtor tapped Shearman & Sterling LLP as bankruptcy counsel;
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as Delaware counsel; AP
Services, LLC as interim management services provider; PJT Partners
Inc. as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC as
claims and noticing agent.


SPANISH HEIGHTS: Seeks to Hire Maier Gutierrez as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Spanish Heights Acquisition Company, LLC seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada to hire Maier
Gutierrez & Associates as its special counsel.

The firm's services include:

     a. representing the Debtor in the state court litigation
entitled Spanish Heights Acquisition Company, LLC et al. v. CBC
Partners I, LLC, et al. (Case No. A-20-813439-B);

     b. representing the Debtor in other potential litigation
matters;

     c. advising the Debtor in connection with the investigation of
potential causes of action and the litigation thereof;

     d. representing the Debtor in any appropriate proceeding or
hearing;

     e. conducting examinations of witnesses, claimants or adverse
parties and assisting in the preparation of pleadings, motions and
orders;

     f. representing the Debtor in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement; and

     g. other legal services.

The firm will be paid on an hourly basis at its standard rates.

As disclosed in court filings, Maier Gutierrez neither holds nor
represents any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Joseph Gutierrez, Esq.
     Maier Gutierrez & Associates
     8816 Spanish Ridge Ave.
     Las Vegas, NV 89148
     Phone: +1 702-629-7900

             About Spanish Heights Acquisition Company

Spanish Heights Acquisition Company, LLC filed its voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Nev. Case No. 21-10501) on Feb. 3, 2021.  Jay Bloom, manager and
owner of SJC Ventures Holdings, LLC, signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of less than
$50,000.

Greene Infuso, LLP and Maier Gutierrez & Associates serve as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel and special counsel, respectively.


SPECTRUM BRANDS: Fitch Assigns BB Rating on $400MM Unsecured Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BBB-'/'RR1' rating to Spectrum
Brands, Inc.'s proposed $350 million of secured term loans due
February 2028 and has assigned a 'BB'/'RR4' rating to its unsecured
notes offering, which Fitch expects to be around $400 million.
Proceeds from the term loan and notes issuances will be used to
repay the company's $250 million of unsecured notes due December
2024 and $500 million of its $1 billion in unsecured notes due July
2025. As such, Fitch expects the transaction to be
leverage-neutral. Fitch has also affirmed Spectrum's existing
ratings, including the Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of
'BB' for both Spectrum and SB/RH Holdings, LLC. The Rating Outlook
is Stable.

Spectrum's 'BB' rating reflects the company's diversified portfolio
across products and categories with well-known brands, and
commitment to maintaining leverage (net debt/EBITDA) between 3.0x
and 4.0x, which equates to a similar gross debt/EBITDA target
assuming $100 million-$150 million in cash longer term, compared
with approximately $225 million as of Jan. 3, 2021. The rating also
reflects expectations for modest organic revenue growth over the
long term, reasonable profitability with EBITDA margins near 15%
and positive FCF.

These positive factors are offset by recent profit margin pressures
across segments and the company's acquisitive posture, which could
cause temporary leverage spikes following a transaction.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Proposed Refinancing: Spectrum is proposing a leverage-neutral
refinancing transaction to extend some of its near-term maturities.
The company plans to issue $350 million in secured term loans due
February 2028 in addition to unsecured notes, which Fitch estimates
could be around $400 million. Proceeds will be used to repay the
company's $250 million in unsecured notes due December 2024 and
$500 million of its $1 billion in unsecured notes due July 2025.
The proposed term loan would be pari passu to the company's
existing $600 million cash flow revolver. Together they comprise
Spectrum's secured debt; the company's remaining debt consists of
unsecured notes.

Fitch considers the transaction positively given the opportunity to
extend maturities with some potential benefit to annual cash
interest expense, depending on final rates. If Spectrum
successfully completes this transaction, its next maturity would be
the revolver due June 2025 and the remainder of the current $1
billion of unsecured notes due July 2025. This assumes the maturity
of the new notes would be 2026 or later.

Diverse Portfolio, Good Brands: Spectrum has a diverse portfolio
across product categories, retail channels and geographies, which
benefits the company as it navigates global and local economic
cycles and retail market share shifts. Following recent asset sales
of Spectrum's batteries and auto care businesses, Spectrum's
largest division is hardware and home improvement, which
contributed approximately one-third of fiscal 2020 (ended September
2020) revenue and approximately 40% of segment EBITDA. The division
focuses on residential security (i.e. locks and keys) as well as
other hardware and plumbing verticals, with well-known brands
including Kwikset, Baldwin and Pfister. Spectrum's home and
personal care division contributes approximately 30% of revenue and
approximately 15% of segment EBITDA, and includes leading brands
such as George Foreman (grilling), Remington (shaving and hair
appliances) and Russell Hobbs (small kitchen electrics).

Spectrum's pet care business, largely consisting of nutrition
brands like Tetra and Dreambone, as well as grooming and odor
businesses, contributes approximately one-quarter of sales and
segment EBITDA. The company's home and garden business, which
largely focuses on insect control and bug repellant through brands
like Spectracide and Hot Shot, provides approximately 15% of
revenue and nearly 20% of segment EBITDA. Fitch recognizes that
Spectrum's 2018/2019 sales of its batteries and auto care
businesses to Energizer Holdings, Inc. for approximately $3.25
billion in cash and stock (10.0x EBITDA) somewhat reduce the
company's overall product category diversity. However, the
portfolio provides reasonable operating diversity if any given
product category or brand sustains some weakness. The
diversification is supported by lack of significant cyclical
volatility, other than some parts of the hardware and
home-improvement business, across much, albeit not all, of
Spectrum's revenue base.

Retail exposure is appropriately diverse, including exposure to key
market share leaders in segments such as general
merchandise/discount, home improvement and e-commerce. Spectrum
should be well positioned to maintain share and consumer
connections despite competitive shifts within the retail industry,
given its broad exposure and relationships with retailers like
Walmart, Inc.; Target Corporation; The Home Depot, Inc.; and
Amazon.com, Inc., which are all expected to grow share longer term.
From a geographic standpoint, three-quarters of the company's
revenue is generated from North America, but Spectrum has some
diversity with exposure to EMEA (17% of sales) and Latin America
(5% of sales).

Spectrum's portfolio also benefits from a number of strong brands
and market positions. The company holds leading market shares in
U.S. residential security, aquatics, pet chews and grooming, insect
control and repellents, and strong positions across a number of
kitchen and personal appliance categories.

Supply Chain Headwinds Abating: Spectrum appears to have resolved
pandemic-related supply chain constraints from temporary closures
of manufacturing facilities in countries such as China, the
Philippines, Mexico and the U.S. These challenges caused 4% revenue
and 7% EBITDA declines in the company's June 2020 quarter.

Spectrum's operating trajectory meaningfully improved in the second
half of the calendar year, as the company has been able to
capitalize on its portfolio's exposure to shelter-in-place
consumption activity via product categories such as kitchen
electrics and personal grooming. Revenue was up 17% and 31% in the
September and December quarters, respectively. EBITDA in the
September quarter was essentially flat to the prior year at around
$168 million, given accelerated selling, general and administrative
investments, and the timing impact of a compensation program
change. EBITDA in the December 2020 quarter (Spectrum's first
fiscal quarter of 2021) more than doubled to approximately $200
million from $92 million the prior year.

Given a strong start to Spectrum's fiscal 2021 (ending September
2021), Fitch projects revenue growth for the full year around 4% to
$4.1 billion from $4.0 billion in fiscal 2020, with EBITDA up 6% to
around $590 million from $555 million in fiscal 2020. Fitch
recognizes that revenue growth could turn somewhat negative by the
end of fiscal 2021, given the difficult comparisons and
expectations of some unwinding of pandemic-related consumer
behavior. Organic revenue and EBITDA growth could be in the 1%-2%
range beginning in fiscal 2022, although Spectrum will face
difficult comparisons early in fiscal 2022 that could lead to
near-flat or modestly negative growth in fiscal 2022.

Fitch expects EBITDA margins to trend around 14.3% beginning in
fiscal 2021 versus 14.0% in fiscal 2020, which was somewhat
pressured by temporary supply chain headwinds.

Commitment to Financial Policy: Spectrum's publicly articulated net
leverage target is 3.0x-4.0x (updated from 3.5x-4.0x in November
2020) over the long term, which equates to a similar gross
debt/EBITDA target, assuming $100 million-$150 million in cash on
hand. The company historically executed debt-financed acquisitions
and subsequently used internally generated cash flow to reduce
debt, in concert with its leverage targets.

However, acquisitions have been somewhat limited in recent years,
with the most recent material investments including $180 million
spent in October 2020 on the acquisition of Europe-focused pet toy
and treat company Armitage Pet Care Ltd., operator of brands like
Good Boy and Meowee!. This acquisition adds around $80 million, or
2%, to Spectrum's top-line. The company's portfolio activity has
been predominantly focused on divestitures, with Spectrum using
asset sale proceeds to reduce debt by around $2 billion in fiscal
2019, ending the fiscal year with $2.3 billion in debt and gross
debt/EBITDA of 4.1x. Net leverage was 3.0x, well within Spectrum's
target, given a strong cash position of over $600 million.

In fiscal 2020, gross leverage ticked up modestly to approximately
4.5x from 4.1x in fiscal 2019, largely due to the company's $300
million unsecured notes issuance, as EBITDA was close to fiscal
2019 levels. Given Fitch's projections of good EBITDA growth in
fiscal 2021 and assuming flat debt around $2.4 billion (net of
capital leases), Fitch expects gross leverage to return to 4.0x.

Fitch expects Spectrum could resume debt-funded acquisitions longer
term, with leverage temporarily elevated. If debt-funded
acquisitions cause leverage to exceed Spectrum's public targets,
Fitch expects the company to pay down debt, as it has in the past.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Spectrum's 'BB' rating reflects the company's diversified portfolio
across products and categories with well-known brands, and
commitment to maintaining net leverage between 3.0x and 4.0x, which
equates to a similar gross debt/EBITDA target, assuming $100
million-$150 million in cash longer term, compared with
approximately $225 million as of Jan. 3, 2021. The rating also
reflects expectations for modest organic revenue growth over the
long term, reasonable profitability with EBITDA margins near 15%,
and positive FCF. These positive factors are offset by recent
profit margin pressures across segments and the company's
acquisitive posture, which could cause temporary leverage spikes
following a transaction.

Spectrum is similarly rated to ACCO Brands Corporation (BB/Stable);
Central Garden & Pet Company (BB/Stable); Tempur Sealy
International, Inc. (BB/Stable); and Levi Strauss & Co.
(BB/Negative). ACCO's 'BB' IDR reflects the company's consistent
FCF and reasonable gross leverage around 3.0x given ongoing debt
repayment after recent acquisitions. The ratings are constrained by
secular challenges in the office products industry and channel
shifts within the company's customer mix, as evidenced by recent
results, along with the risk of further debt-financed
acquisitions.

Central Garden & Pet Company's 'BB'/Stable rating reflects the
company's strong market positions within the pet and lawn and
garden segments, ample liquidity supported by robust FCF, and
moderate leverage offset by limited scale with EBITDA below $300
million. Fitch expects modest organic revenue growth over the
medium term supplemented by acquisitions, with EBITDA margins
around 10%. Fitch expects gross leverage to trend in the 3.0x-3.5x
range, up from 2.6x in fiscal 2020 (ended September) as the company
manages leverage in this range over time.

Tempur Sealy's 'BB'/Stable ratings reflects its leading market
position as a vertically integrated global bedding company with
well-known, established brands across a wide variety of price
points offered through broad distribution channels. The ratings are
tempered by the single-product focus in a highly competitive,
fragmented market exposed to potential pullbacks in discretionary
consumer spending during periods of macroeconomic weakness. The
mattress industry has also been susceptible to periods of
irrational pricing, secular shifts in consumer preferences, and
bankruptcies in both the supplier and distribution side. Over time,
Fitch expects the company to manage gross leverage within its
targeted range of less than 3.0x, diverting FCF toward shareholder
returns and opportunistic acquisitions.

Levi's 'BB' IDR reflects the significant business interruption
resulting from the coronavirus pandemic and changes in consumer
behavior, which materially reduced sales of apparel. The Negative
Outlook reflects uncertainty regarding the timing and magnitude of
a recovery in operating momentum. Adjusted leverage increased to
approximately 6.0x in fiscal 2020 from 3.1x in fiscal 2019 as
EBITDA declined to approximately $360 million from approximately
$750 million in fiscal 2019 on a nearly 23% sales decline to $4.45
billion. Fitch expects adjusted leverage to be in the high-3.0x
range in fiscal 2021, assuming sales and EBITDA declines of around
12% from fiscal 2019. Increased confidence in Levi's ability to
achieve Fitch's projections and bring adjusted leverage to under
4.0x would lead to a stabilization in Fitch's Rating Outlook.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its rating case for the issuer
include:

-- Revenue is forecast to grow around 4% to $4.1 billion in
    fiscal 2021 following 31% growth in the company's fiscal first
    quarter. Revenue growth could remain positive through the
    first fiscal half on tailwinds from consumer behavior changes
    resulting from the coronavirus pandemic. However, it could
    turn negative in the second half of the fiscal year against
    more challenging top-line comparisons and as behavioral
    changes are expected to unwind. Organic revenue could be in
    the 1%-2% range beginning in fiscal 2022, although Spectrum
    will face difficult comparisons early in fiscal 2022 that
    could lead to near-flat or modestly negative growth in fiscal
    2022.

-- Fitch projects fiscal 2021 EBITDA to grow around 6% to around
    $590 million, with strong EBITDA growth in the fiscal first
    half and potentially negative in the second half, assuming
    revenue declines. Fitch expects EBITDA growth beginning in
    fiscal 2022 to track with revenue growth.

-- FCF (after dividends of around $75 million or $1.68 per share)
    is forecast to be around $150 million in fiscal 2021. Fitch
    expects the company to generate around $75 million from the
    sale of its Energizer stock. Cash flow usage in 2021 includes
    around $180 million for the Armitage acquisition. Stock
    buybacks, which were $42 million in fiscal 1Q21, could be
    around $150 million for the full fiscal year. Fitch projects
    FCF could improve to the $200 million-$250 million range
    beginning in fiscal 2022 on lower cash restructuring charges.
    FCF could be used toward tuck-in acquisitions and share
    repurchases.

-- Gross leverage is forecast to trend around 4.0x beginning in
    fiscal 2021 absent debt-financed acquisitions. Fitch expects
    Spectrum to generally operate within the context of its public
    net leverage target of 3.0x-4.0x over time, equating to a
    similar range on a gross leverage basis, assuming $100
    million-$200 million in cash, although Fitch recognizes debt
    financed transactions could cause leverage to be occasionally
    elevated on a temporary basis. Fitch would expect Spectrum to
    use FCF to reduce debt following a debt-financed acquisition,
    as it has in the past.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- A positive rating action could result if Spectrum sustained
    positive organic growth and gross debt/EBITDA below 4.0x.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- A negative rating action could result from a low single-digit
    sales decline, yielding EBITDA trending below $550 million and
    gross debt/EBITDA sustaining above 4.5x. A debt-financed
    transaction that reduced Fitch's confidence in Spectrum's
    ability to return gross debt/EBITDA below 4.5x within two
    years after the transaction would also be a rating concern.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Ample Liquidity: Liquidity was $809 million as of Jan. 3, 2021,
consisting of $224.5 million of cash and equivalents and $584.5
million of availability on its $600 million revolving credit
facility due June 2025. The company had no outstanding revolver
borrowings as of Jan. 3, 2021, although availability was reduced by
$15.5 million of outstanding LOC.

As of Jan. 3, 2021, Spectrum's capital structure consisted of
approximately $1.85 billion of senior unsecured notes maturing
between 2024 and 2030, and EUR425 million of unsecured euro notes
maturing in October 2026. The company is proposing a refinancing in
which proceeds from $350 million in new secured term loans due
February 2028 and new unsecured notes, which Fitch estimates could
be around $400 million, would be used to repay the company's $250
million in unsecured notes due December 2024 and $500 million of
its $1 billion in unsecured notes due July 2025. The proposed term
loan would be pari passu to the company's existing revolver. After
the transaction, the company's next maturity would be the revolver
due June 2025 and remainder of the $1 billion in unsecured notes
due July 2025. The company has not indicated an expected maturity
for the new proposed notes but Fitch expects they would not be due
prior to 2025.

Recovery Considerations

Fitch has assigned Recovery Ratings (RRs) to the various debt
tranches in accordance with Fitch criteria, which allows for the
assignment of RRs for issuers with IDRs in the 'BB' category. Given
the distance to default, RRs in the 'BB' category are not computed
by bespoke analysis. Instead, they serve as a label to reflect an
estimate of the risk of these instruments relative to other
instruments in the entity's capital structure. Fitch assigned the
first-lien secured debt a 'BBB-'/'RR1', notched up two from the IDR
and indicating outstanding recovery prospects given default.
Unsecured debt will typically achieve average recovery, and was
thus assigned a 'BB'/'RR4'.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL ADJUSTMENTS

Material financial adjustments include stock-based compensation,
safety recalls, divestitures, legal and environmental remediation
reserves, inventory step-up and other non-operating expenses.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


SPECTRUM BRANDS: S&P Rates New $350MM Senior Sr. Term Loan 'BB-'
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '1'
recovery rating to Spectrum Brands Inc.'s proposed $350 million
senior secured term loan due 2028. The '1' recovery rating
indicates its expectation for very high (90%-100%; rounded
estimate: 95%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

S&P said, "We expect the company to use the net proceeds from this
issuance to redeem all of its $250 million senior unsecured notes
due 2024 and a portion of its senior unsecured notes due 2025.
Therefore, we view the transaction as leverage neutral. Our ratings
on the term loan assume the transaction closes on substantially the
same terms that were provided to us. Spectrum will have about $2.5
billion of debt outstanding pro forma for the proposed
transaction.

"All of our existing ratings on the company, including our 'B'
issuer credit rating and negative outlook, are unchanged.

"Our ratings on Spectrum incorporate its good product diversity in
the consumer product sector and its participation in low-growth,
highly competitive product categories that are susceptible to
seasonality and input-cost volatility. The company's Hardware &
Home Improvement (HHI) segment has a solid market position in
residential locks, builder's hardware, and plumbing. The
value-focused Home and Garden (H&G) segment has a defensible market
position but is susceptible to extreme weather conditions. The
Global Pet Care (GPC) sector has good fundamentals, including
relatively stable underlying consumer demand. Nevertheless, it's a
highly fragmented and competitive space. Input-cost variability
also remains a key risk, especially for Spectrum's HHI and H&G
businesses."



SUPERIOR PLUS: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 18, 2021, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' issuer
credit rating on Superior Plus Corp.

At the same time, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' issue-level
rating on the company's unsecured notes, and revised its recovery
rating on the notes to '4' from '3' to reflect the lower enterprise
value.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that adjusted debt to
EBITDA will remain in the low-to-mid 4x area over the next 12
months. In S&P's view, the narrow scope of operations and loss of
cash flows from the chemicals segment are offset by lower inherent
volatility and continued growth in the energy services segment.

Superior Plus announced that it has entered into an agreement to
sell its chemicals segment for C$725 million in gross proceeds to
Birch Hill Equity Partners, a Canada-based private equity firm.
Superior expects to receive about C$600 million in cash proceeds at
the time of close, while issuing a five and a half-year C$125
million unsecured note to Birch Hill. The cash proceeds are
expected to be used toward repaying amounts outstanding on the
credit facility (about C$360 million) and to fund future
acquisitions. S&P expects the transaction to be completed by the
second quarter of 2021.

S&P said, "We expect the sale of the chemicals segment to weaken
Superior's operating breadth; the segment accounted for 20% of
total cash flows in 2020. Despite the business scope narrowing from
an operating perspective, our perception of the industry risk has
improved as we now view it to be less volatile. The sale also
allows management to focus on expanding the company's energy
services segment. Superior's growth strategy has been focused on
increasing the company's presence in the U.S. propane distribution
business. We believe the proceeds from the sale and investment made
by Brookfield Asset Management Inc. during 2020 (C$350 million)
provide Superior with the balance-sheet flexibility to further
penetrate this market. As a result, we expect acquisitions at an
aggressive rate over our forecast period and believe the loss of
cash flows from the chemicals segment is likely to be replenished
by growth in earnings from the energy services segment over the
next three-to-four years.

"We expect leverage in the low-to-mid 4x area, which is consistent
with our current rating threshold.

"Based on our forecasts, we estimate adjusted debt to EBITDA to be
in the low-to-mid 4x area over the next two years. Our estimates
assume the impact from warmer weather conditions will be offset by
growth in cash flows from acquisitions. Specifically, we believe
EBITDA will increase from current levels by 4%-5% annually. We also
expect the company to generate positive free cash flows in the
low-to-mid C$200 million area annually over the next two years; but
believe these will be largely used toward dividends and
acquisitions. Management expects to continue distributing dividends
in line with its target payout ratio of 40%-60%. We also expect
tuck-in acquisitions of more than C$200 million annually. As a
result, we don't estimate any further debt reductions over our
forecast period but believe leverage will remain below 5x during
that time.

"Our ratings reflect our reassessment of the company's business
risk, while comparing Superior with peers such as Suburban Propane
Partners L.P.

"Our business risk assessment on Superior primarily reflects
exposure to the propane distribution market, weak pricing power,
and limited organic growth prospects due to competition from
alternative fuel sources (primarily in its U.S. markets), namely
natural gas and electricity. This is partially offset by the
company's leading market position in Canada and growing share in
the U.S., as well as its ability to sustain stable margins."

Superior has an estimated 40% market share in Canada. The company's
growth strategy is now focused on increasing its presence in the
fragmented U.S. propane distribution business through ongoing
tuck-in acquisitions, as demonstrated by the pace of recent
acquisitions in this market. Specifically, the acquisition of NGL
Energy Partners L.P.'s retail propane distribution business in 2018
provided the company with a strong platform for growth in the
eastern U.S. The company has also recently been active in
California and has stated its intention to expand its presence in
this region, given good growth prospects.

S&P said, "Our rating on Superior is comparable to that of peers
such as Suburban Propane Partners L.P. (BB-/Stable/--). Similar to
Superior, Suburban also operates in propane distribution and has
significant coverage in the U.S. Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, and
West Coast. While it only has a presence in the U.S., it has higher
margins given a higher proportion of residential customers. We
expect Superior's profitability to improve as the company continues
to invest in improving operational efficiencies (such as its
digital platform and installing sensors in tanks), and continues to
increase the proportion of retail propane volumes in its sales mix,
which has a higher unit margin. At the same time, earnings
volatility has declined, in our view, because Superior has
diversified across different regions in North America, reducing its
sensitivity to volatile weather patterns.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the company will
maintain an adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio in the low-to-mid 4x area
in 2021 and 2022. We expect Superior to continue making tuck-in
acquisitions but assume leverage will remain below 5x over our
forecast period

"We could lower the ratings within the next 12 months if we expect
Superior's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio to increase above 5x, with
limited prospects for improvement shortly thereafter. We believe
this could occur if cash flows deteriorate due to lower demand from
warm winters or competitive pressures affect gross margins. We
could also lower the rating if management pursues more aggressive
financial policies or actions, including predominantly
leverage-financed acquisitions or shareholder returns.

"We could raise the ratings if the company meaningfully increased
its size and scale, and reduced its leverage position. This would
most likely occur through an acquisition, funded in a balanced
manner such that adjusted debt to EBITDA is maintained and
sustained below 3.5x."


TEEKAY CORP: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B+' ICR
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 17, 2021, S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook to
negative from stable and affirmed its 'B+' long-term issuer credit
and issue-level ratings on Teekay Corp. S&P has revised the
recovery rating on the senior secured notes to '4' from '3' to
reflect the lower perceived value for the FPSOs.

The negative outlook reflects refinancing risk and Teekay's
increasing reliance on subsidiaries to meet financial obligations.

S&P said, "In our view, the upcoming refinancing, in the absence of
tangible collateral, faces a meaningful credit risk. We believe the
proceeds from the anticipated sale of the FPSOs (which are the
underlying collateral for the notes), given their current market
value, will not be sufficient to fully repay the secured debt at
Teekay Corp." The company has received US$67 million from the
Foinaven contract, but only modest sale proceeds are expected from
the Hummingbird and Banff FPSOs. In addition, once the FPSOs are
sold, there will no longer be any tangible collateral remaining at
the parent, which could necessitate some form of refinancing for
the remaining balance. Furthermore, the company will remain
increasingly reliant on dividends from TGP to meet financial
commitments and without a substantial increase to these dividends
(about US$40 million currently), the upstream cash flows will also
not be sufficient to fully repay debt at the parent level. The
negative outlook reflects the uncertainty around the refinancing,
especially given that the parent's debt is structurally
subordinated to that of the subsidiaries. In addition, the company
has about US$110 million of convertible notes that are due January
2023.

Although the parent has an undrawn US$150 million margin revolver
and bondholders effectively have a second lien on equity interests
in subsidiaries, lack of a clearly defined refinancing plan
underpins the outlook revision. In addition, the margin revolver
matures in June 2022, before the notes' maturity.

S&P said, "The affirmation largely reflects contract stability at
TGP, and our expectation that credit measures will remain within
our rating threshold. The affirmation largely reflects the
contracted revenue base at TGP, which provides earnings stability.
We view TGP to be relatively resilient, given its fixed-price term
contracts with highly rated oil and gas companies including BP,
Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Cheniere, and Naturgy Energy. The company
has close to 100% of its liquefied natural gas (LNG) fleet under
fixed-rate, take-or-pay contracts for 2021, which in our view
provides some degree of earnings stability.

"While crude tanker rates spiked in the first half of 2020 from
strong demand for floating storage, rates have fallen as expected.
Accordingly, we continue to expect Teekay Tankers Ltd.'s (TNK) cash
flows will decline meaningfully in 2021, given the company's high
spot market exposure (about 75%). However, we believe tanker supply
fundamentals remain positive beyond 2021, due to a relatively small
order book and an aging fleet (averaging about 11 years), which,
among other factors, will limit supply growth and downward pressure
on spot rates.

"Under our base case scenario, we estimate adjusted debt to EBITDA
in the mid 5x area and funds from operations (FFO) to debt of about
12%-15% in 2021 and 2022."

The negative outlook reflects increasing refinancing risk
associated with the existing debt at Teekay, and increasing
reliance on dividends from subsidiaries. In S&P's view, proceeds
from asset sales and modest dividends from TGP are insufficient to
meet the financing obligations at the parent level.

S&P said, "We could lower the rating within the next six-12 months
if Teekay is unable to address the evolving refinancing risk we
attribute to its senior secured debt, as proceeds from the sale of
its FPSOs will likely be insufficient to fully repay the debt. In
addition, we could lower the rating if the company disposes its
FPSOs, while debt remains outstanding, as this would increase
reliance on distributions from subsidiaries to service debt
obligations. A downgrade could also result if operating performance
deviates from our expectations, with FFO to debt declining to the
mid-to-lower half of the 0%-12% range. We believe this could occur
if industry conditions lead to unfavorable renegotiations of LNG
contracts, resulting in a significant negative variation in
revenues and cash flows relative to current forecasts.

"We believe maintaining the current 'B+' rating will be difficult,
given our view that Teekay will remain reliant on distributions
from its subsidiaries to meet financial obligations. Although
unlikely, we could revise the outlook to stable if the parent
repays all its debt outstanding following the sale of the FPSOs. In
this scenario, we would also expect the consolidated entity's
operating performance to remain in line with our current
expectations, with FFO to debt remaining above 12%."


THG PROPERTIES: Owners to Contribute $100,000 to Plan
-----------------------------------------------------
THG Properties LLC and Town Hospitality Group, Inc., filed a Second
Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization on Feb. 12, 2021.

The Debtors Plan is premised on the purchase and refinancing by
Acorn Capital LLC of its senior secured debt currently held by
Avidia Bank.  The refinancing, along with the Debtors' current cash
and future operations, will permit the Debtors to provide a
meaningful distribution to creditors.

The Second Amended Plan further contemplates: (i)the satisfaction
in full of all administrative and priority claims; (ii) the full
satisfaction of the secured claims of the Massachusetts Department
of Revenue(the "DOR") and the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS")
to the extent that such claims are attributable to unpaid
prepetition taxes and interest thereon; (iii) the payment of a 100%
dividend, on the Effective Date, to the holders of allowed general
unsecured claims in the THG case; (iv) the payment by Town
Hospitality of a 25% dividend to the holders of allowed general
unsecured claims in the Town Hospitality case, including by
agreement certain subordinated claims of the DOR and the IRS
attributable to penalties, over a period of 36 months from the
Effective Date of the Plan; and (v) a further contribution by the
Debtors' equity holders of $100,000, payable in years four and five
of the Plan, secured by a junior lien on their equity interests in
THG.

The prior iteration of the Plan did not provide for the $100,000
contribution by equity holders.

Equity holders are unimpaired.  The equity interest holders of THG
and Town Hospitality are James Derosier, Ryan Campbell, Greg
Miscikowski and Todd Tierney, who will receive no distribution
under the Plan on account of such interests, but will retain
unaltered, the legal, equitable and contractual rights to which
such interests were entitled as of the Petition Date, except to the
extent that equity is disbursed to holders of Allowed Class 4B
Claims.

A copy of the Second Amended Plan filed Feb. 12, 2021, is available
at https://bit.ly/3u9VuSX

                      About THG Properties

THG Properties LLC is a Massachusetts Limited Liability Company
that owns and operates the real property located at 386 Commercial
Street, Provincetown, Massachusetts.  The Property is tenanted by a
15-room guest house known as the Waterford Inn and a restaurant
called Spindlers.  The Inn and Restaurant are owned by Town
Hospitality, a Massachusetts corporation.  Both are owned by the
same individuals.  The Property has an appraised value of $5.94
million.

THG Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 20-10644) on March 5, 2020.  The
petition was signed by James Derosier, manager.  At the time of
filing, the Debtor had $5,988,300 in assets and $3,571,822 in
debts.  THG Properties LLC is a single asset real estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Town Hospitality Group filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 20-11496) on July 14, 2020, listing under $500,000
in estimated assets and $1 million to $10 million in estimated
liabilities.

The two cases are jointly administered.

Judge Frank J. Bailey oversees the cases.  The Debtors are
represented by David B. Madoff, Esq., at Madoff & Khoury, LLP.  No
creditors' committee has been appointed in either case.


TIDEWATER ESTATES: Seeks to Hire Re/Max as Real Estate Broker
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tidewater Estates, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Mississippi to employ Re/Max
Coast Delta Realty as its real estate broker to facilitate the sale
of its real property in Hancock County, Miss.
The firm's services include:

     a. listing for sale of the real property;

     b. assisting in negotiations with prospective purchasers; and


     c. assisting in the closing of the sale.

Re/Max does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estate, according to court papers filed by the firm.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jon Ritten
     Paulette Snyder
     RE/MAX Coast Delta Realty
     5400 Indian Hill Dr.
     Diamondhead, MS 39525
     Phone: +1 228-255-2600

                      About Tidewater Estates

Tidewater Estates, Inc. filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No.
20-50955) on June 9, 2020. In the petition signed by Emile A.
Bertucci, III, director, secretary and treasurer, the Debtor was
estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets and $500,000
to $1 million in liabilities.

Judge Katharine M. Samson oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Sheehan & Ramsey, PLLC as its legal counsel and
L. Kelly Baker, CPA, PA as its accountant.


TOPP'S MECHANICAL: Gets OK to Hire Houghton Bradford as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Topp's Mechanical, Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nebraska to hire Houghton Bradford
Whitted PC, LLO as its bankruptcy counsel.

The firm will render these services:

     a. perform all necessary services including, without
limitation, legal advice and the preparation of necessary documents
in the areas of restructuring and bankruptcy;

     b. advise the Debtor regarding its powers and duties in the
continued management and operation of its businesses and
properties;

     c. attend meetings and negotiate with creditors and other
parties;

     d. take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate, including prosecuting actions on the Debtor's
behalf, defending any action commenced against the Debtor, and
representing the Debtor's interests in negotiations concerning all
litigation in which the Debtor is involved;

     e. prepare legal papers;

     f. take any necessary action to obtain approval of a
disclosure statement and confirmation of a plan of reorganization;


     g. represent the Debtor in connection with any potential
post-petition financing;

     h. appear before the bankruptcy court, any appellate courts,
and the U.S. trustee; and

     i. perform all other necessary legal services for the Debtor
in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will be compensated at its standard hourly rate of $275.
It received a retainer in the amount of $14,000.

Houghton Bradford is a "disinterested person," as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court papers
filed by the firm.

The firm can be reached through:

     Justin D. Eichmann, Esq.
     Houghton Bradford Whitted PC, LLO
     6457 Frances Street, Suite 100
     Omaha, NE 68106
     Tel: (402) 344-4000
     Email: jeichmann@houghtonbradford.com

                   About Topp's Mechanical

Topp's Mechanical Inc., a mechanical contractor in Tecumseh, Neb.,
filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 21-40038) on Jan. 15,
2021.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Thomas L. Saladino oversees the case.

Justin D. Eichmann, Esq., at Houghton Bradford Whitted PC, LLO, is
the Debtor's legal counsel.


TOPPS COMPANY: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of The Topps Company, Inc. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

The Topps Company, Inc.'s CFR (B2) reflects its small size annual
revenues, niche market focus in mature categories, and its exposure
to inherent volatility from the sports and entertainment
collectibles industry. Some retail customers of the company's
confectionery segment have experienced store closures or reduced
operations because of the coronavirus outbreak, which negatively
impacted demand. Moody's expects demand for the company's
confectionery products will sequentially improve, as retail stores
re-open and the company benefits from its e-commerce initiatives
but will remain below prior year levels as specialty retail
customers continue to have lower traffic. Governance factors
primarily consider the company's private equity ownership, and the
associated potential for shareholder distributions. The company's
credit profile also reflects its solid position in the domestic
sports card market, and healthy geographic exposure that reaches
the North American, Latin American and EMEA markets. The company
has moderate segment diversification, highlighted by a
well-established presence in the confectionery business, which has
historically helped mitigate volatility in financial performance
stemming from the more volatile sports and entertainment segment.
However, through most of 2020 the sports and entertainment
segment's significant revenue and earnings growth has more than
offset weakness in the confectionery business, driven primarily by
strong demand in the baseball category across all channels. The
company's highly successful Project 2020 (20 artists remaking 20
iconic rookie cards) is contributing to strong performance this
year but will create difficult comps for 2021 when Moody's expect
earnings to decline and leverage to increase. The rating is also
supported by Topps' moderate financial leverage for the rating, and
its good liquidity.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


TRANSPINE INC: Has Until Feb. 25 to File Amended Plan & Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 11, 2021, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, San Fernando Valley Division, held a
chapter 11 status conference for debtor Transpine, Inc.  On Feb.
16, 2021, Judge Victoria S. Kaufman ordered that:

     * The Debtor must file an amended chapter 11 plan and related
disclosure statement no later than Feb. 25, 2021.

     * March 11, 2021, is fixed as the last day to file objections
to the approval of the amended disclosure statement.

     * March 25, 2021, at 1:00 p.m., is the hearing regarding the
adequacy of the amended disclosure statement and a continued
chapter 11 status conference.

     * March 15, 2021, is fixed as the last day for the debtor to
file a status report, to be served on the Debtor's 20 largest
unsecured creditors, all secured creditors, and the United States
Trustee.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 16, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3dqPaAm from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

        Leslie A. Cohen, Esq.
        J'aime Williams, Esq.
        LESLIE COHEN LAW, PC
        506 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 200
        Santa Monica, CA 90401
        Telephone: 310.394.5900
        Facsimile: 310.394.9280
        E-mail: leslie@lesliecohenlaw.com
                jaime@lesliecohenlaw.com

                      About Transpine Inc.

Transpine, Inc., based in Tarzana, CA, is a corporation whose
primary asset is its 100% ownership of the real property located at
4256 Tarzana Estates Drive, Tarzana, CA 91356.

Transpine filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
20-11286) on July 22, 2020.  In the petition signed by CEO Nisan
Tepper, the Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities.  The Honorable Victoria S. Kaufman
presides over the case.  LESLIE COHEN LAW PC serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.


TRI-STATE PAIN: March 25 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
---------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 15, 2021, debtor Tri-State Pain Institute, LLC, filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
a Disclosure Statement and Plan.  On Feb. 16, 2021, Judge Thomas P.
Agresti ordered that:

     * March 18, 2021, is the last day for filing and serving
objections to the Disclosure Statement and to file a Request for
Payment of an Administrative Expense.

     * March 25, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. is the hearing to consider the
approval of the Disclosure Statement which shall be held by the
Zoom Video Conference Application.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 16, 2021, is available at
https://bit.ly/3k3H7Lp from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

               About Tri-State Pain Institute

Tri-State Pain Institute, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Cas No. 20-10049) on Jan.
23, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of between $500,001 and $1 million and liabilities of
between $1,000,001 and $10 million.  

Judge Thomas P. Agresti oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Marsh, Spaeder, Baur, Spaeder, and Schaaf, LLP,
as the legal counsel and Coldwell Banker Select, Realtors as real
estate broker.

On February 14, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for Regions 3 and 9
appointed a Committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case.  The Committee is represented by Knox, McLaughlin,
Gornall & Sennett, P.C.


TURNING POINT: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Turning Point Brands, Inc. and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Turning Point Brands, Inc's (TPB) credit profile (CFR B2) reflects
its high financial leverage, modest cash flows and competition
against much larger players. The company faces execution risk as it
aggressively pursues acquisitions and investment into new
generation products to offset an industry-wide decline of
traditional combustible cigarettes in the United States. TPB
competes against significantly larger, better resourced, and
well-known branded tobacco manufacturers. Regulatory risks will
remain high over the next year as TPB seeks approval of its vaping
products through the pre-market tobacco application process (PMTA).
The credit profile also reflects growth in its new generation
vaping products (NewGen) and smokeless products. Moody's expect the
impact from the coronavirus pandemic and subsequent economic
downturn will continue to create opportunities for the company as
customers trade down in the smoking and smokeless categories and
NewGen products continue to grow. Moody's further expect the
company will remain acquisitive as it seeks opportunities for
growth. Barring any material debt-financed acquisitions, Moody's
expect the company to maintain moderately high debt-to-EBITDA
leverage over the next twelve to eighteen months.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


U.S.A. DAWGS: Mojave Substitution as Successor-In-Interest OK
-------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit granted U.S.A.
Dawgs, Inc.'s and Mojave Desert Holdings, LLC's motion to subsitute
Mojave as U.S.A. Dawgs' successor-in-interest.

Crocs, Inc. is the owner of U.S. Design Patent No. D517,789 ("the
'789 patent"), titled "Footwear."  The '789 patent discloses what
has become Crocs' iconic foam-molded clog design.

On August 6, 2012, Crocs sued U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. for infringement
of the '789 patent in the United States District Court for the
District of Colorado based on U.S.A. Dawgs's manufacture and sale
of its own form of foammolded clog footwear.  On August 24, 2012,
shortly after Crocs sued for infringement, U.S.A. Dawgs filed a
third-party request for inter partes reexamination of the '789
patent at the US Patent and Trademark Office under 35 U.S.C.
Section 311.  The USPTO ordered the reexamination on November 19,
2012.  The district court stayed the proceedings in light of the
inter partes reexamination. The examiner rejected the claim as
anticipated under 35 U.S.C. Section 102(b). Crocs appealed to the
Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

On January 31, 2018, while the appeal was pending before the Board,
U.S.A. Dawgs filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada.  In May, U.S.A. Dawgs
moved for the bankruptcy court to approve the sale of all of its
assets to a recently formed entity, Dawgs Holdings, LLC, "free and
clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances subject to 11 U.S.C.
Section 363(b) and (f)."  On July 20, 2018, the bankruptcy court
approved the sale of U.S.A. Dawgs's assets to Dawgs Holdings
pursuant to the terms and conditions of an Asset Purchase
Agreement.  The Asset Purchase Agreement assigned Dawgs Holdings
all of U.S.A. Dawgs's right, title and interest in, to and under
all of the assets, properties and rights of every kind and nature,
whether real, personal or mixed, tangible or intangible (including
intellectual property and goodwill), wherever located and whether
existing or later acquired, owned, leased, licensed or used or held
for use in or relating to the operation of its business as of the
Closing Date.

In its order approving the sale, the bankruptcy court stated that
the Sale was not free and clear of any Claims that Crocs, Inc.  may
hold for patent infringement occurring post-Closing Date by any
person including the Prevailing Bidder, or any defenses Crocs may
have in respect of any litigation claims that are sold pursuant to
the Sale.

U.S.A. Dawgs moved to distribute the net proceeds from the sale of
its assets and to dismiss its Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.  On
August 21, 2018, the bankruptcy court granted U.S.A. Dawgs's
motion, authorizing the distribution of the net sale proceeds and
dismissing U.S.A. Dawgs's Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.  On August
15, 2018, Dawgs Holdings assigned all rights, including the claims
asserted by U.S.A. Dawgs in the District of Colorado action and the
inter partes reexamination, to Mojave.  On October 23, 2018, U.S.A.
Dawgs dissolved but continued to exist for limited purposes,
including "prosecuting and defending suits, actions, proceedings
and claims of any kind or character by or against it" and "enabling
it . . . to do every other act to wind up and liquidate its
business and affairs."

On July 18, 2019, Mojave filed a petition with the Board titled,
"Request to Change the Real-Partyin-Interest from Third-Party
Requestor U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. to Mojave Desert Holding, LLC in Inter
Partes Reexamination/Hearing."  The Board expunged and dismissed
Mojave's request on August 19, 2019, on various grounds.  On
September 10, 2019, the Board issued its decision reversing the
examiner's rejection of the '789 patent's sole claim.  U.S.A. Dawgs
appealed to the United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
In its Notice of Appeal, U.S.A. Dawgs stated that Mojave
"intend[ed] to file a motion for substitution of parties" with the
court "pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(b)."  On
December 13, 2019, U.S.A. Dawgs and Mojave filed the motion to
substitute.

Crocs asserted that U.S.A. Dawgs and Mojave's motion to subsitute
should be denied for the following reasons:

     (1) that the Board correctly determined that Mojave is not the
successor-in-interest to U.S.A. Dawgs with respect to the inter
partes reexamination because the bankruptcy sale did not transfer
U.S.A. Dawgs's interest as a requester to Dawgs Holdings;

     (2) that, even if Mojave is a successor-in-interest to U.S.A.
Dawgs, Mojave did not seek substitution before the Board for nearly
a year after it acquired U.S.A. Dawgs's interest in the inter
partes reexamination and that the Board properly denied
substitution on this ground under 37 C.F.R. Section 41.8(a);

     (3) that the interest of a requester cannot be assigned under
the statute governing appeals from inter partes reexamination;

     (4) that, even if Mojave is the successor-ininterest to U.S.A.
Dawgs, Mojave lacks standing because it does not face a potential
suit for infringement; and

     (5) that Mojave failed to file a notice of appeal from the
Board's decision.                
  
The Court disagreed with Crocs' arguments.  As to Crocs' first
argument, the Court found that "all of U.S.A. Dawgs's interests
were included as property of its estate when it filed for
bankruptcy. See 5 Collier on Bankruptcy... the first sale from
U.S.A. Dawgs to Dawgs Holdings clearly transferred all of U.S.A.
Dawgs's assets and claims and did so using broad language.  U.S.A.
Dawgs did not need to enumerate each of its assets individually to
effectuate the broad transfer.  U.S.A. Dawgs dissolved and did not
continue to participate before the Board.  Under the circumstances,
the transfer of all assets on its face included the rights in the
Board proceeding.
The second sale similarly assigned Mojave all of Dawgs Holdings's
assets and claims and, for clarity, specifically enumerated its
interest as the requester in the inter partes reexamination.  The
reassignment provided '[t]hat for good and valuable consideration,
. . . [Dawgs Holdings], by these presents does hereby sell, grant,
and convey unto [Mojave] . . . all of [Dawgs Holdings's] right,
title and interest in and to all of the Acquired Assets . . .,
which, for the avoidance of doubt, is intended to and does include
all rights of [Dawgs Holdings] in any post-grant proceeding before
the U.S. Patent and Trademark O!ce concerning any of the patents at
issue . . ., including without limitation, inter partes
reexamination control no. 95/002"... As these assignments make
clear, Mojave is the successor-in-interest of U.S.A. Dawgs."

Addressing Crocs' second argument, the Court held that "We do not
read 37 C.F.R. Section 41.8(a) as permitting the Board to ignore a
transfer of interest in an inter partes reexamination that has been
assigned to a successor-in-interest.  The purpose of the rule is to
detect conflicts of interest and to enable enforcement of inter
partes reexamination estoppel provisions.  The rule is not directly
related to substitution.  Notably, in the federal district courts,
there is no time limit attached to a party moving for substitution
on the basis of a transfer in interest... If the Board were
permitted to preclude substitution on the basis of a transfer in
interest because of a late filing, this would defeat the important
interest in having the proper party before the Board.  The Board
erred by not substituting Mojave as the third-party requester while
the inter partes reexamination was pending before the Board."

With regard to Crocs' third argument, the Court said that "here, it
may well be that the right of the requester to appeal cannot be
separated from the requester's potential liability for
infringement.  But we are aware of no case that suggests that a
federal claim is lost when it is transferred together with the
assignor's entire business.  Where, as here, the requester's right
has been transferred together with all other assets, there is no
reason that the requester's right to challenge the Board's decision
cannot be effectively transferred.  To refuse to recognize such a
transfer where the other assets remain subject to infringement
liability would create a situation in which the assets remained
potentially liable for infringement, but the transferee would have
lost the right to challenge patent validity.  Crocs points to
nothing in the statutory structure or legislative history of the
inter partes reexamination statute that suggests that the general
rule regarding the assignment of causes of action should not apply
to this situation, and we similarly are aware of none.  We hold
that, under the statute, the requester's right (including its right
to appeal) may be transferred at least when it occurs as part of
the transfer of the requester's entire business or assets."

The Court, disagreeing with Crocs' fourth argument, held that
"Mojave has standing as U.S.A. Dawgs's successor-in-interest.  The
sale agreement approved by the bankruptcy court specifically
provided that the transferred assets '[were] not free and clear of
any Claims Crocs, Inc. . . . may hold for patent infringement
occurring post-Closing Date by any person including the Prevailing
Bidder'... The acquired assets thus face potential patent
infringement claims. Moreover, Mojave also could face potential
patent infringement liability because of activities after the
bankruptcy sale relating to the sale of acquired inventory that is
alleged to infringe.  Mojave also meets the other two requirements
of standing.  Mojave's injury is traceable to the challenged '789
patent, which has been asserted by Crocs in the District of
Colorado litigation, and would be redressed by a favorable ruling
in this court that reversed the Board's finding of patentability of
the '789 patent."

Finally, with regard to Crocs' fifth argument, the Court found that
"Mojave could not file a notice of appeal because it had not been
added as a party by the Board to the inter partes reexamination
proceeding.  Under Nevada law, however, U.S.A. Dawgs retained the
ability to file a protective notice of appeal, and did so on
November 8, 2019.  That was sufficient to confer jurisdiction on
this court."

The Court concluded that Mojave is the successor-in-interest to
U.S.A. Dawgs, that it has standing to pursue the challenge to the
'798 patent, and that the Board erred in not substituted Mojave for
U.S.A Dawgs as the third-party requester during the inter partes
reexamination.


The case is MOJAVE DESERT HOLDINGS, LLC, Appellant, v. CROCS, INC.,
Appellee, Case No. 2020-1167 (Fed. Cir.).  A full-text copy of the
Order, dated February 11, 2021, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/131ggij8 from Leagle.com.

Mojave Desert Holdings, LLC is represented by:

          Matt Berkowitz, Esq.
          SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP
          1460 El Camino Real
          2nd Floor
          Menlo Park, CA 94025-4110
          Telephone: 6500-838-3600
          Email: matt.berkowitz@shearman.com

          - and -

          Yue Wang, Esq.
          Patrick Robert Colsher, Esq.
          Mark A. Hannemann, Esq.
          Thomas R. Makin, Esq.
          599 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10022-6069
          Telephone: 212-848-4000
          Email: liu.wang@shearman.com
                 patrick.colsher@shearman.com
                 mark.hannemann@shearman.com
                 thomas.makin@shearman.com

          - and -

          Laura Kieran Kieckhefer, Esq.
          535 Mission Street
          25th Floor
          San Francisco, CA 94105-2997
          Telephone: 415-616-1100
          Email: kieran.kieckhefer@shearman.com

Crocs, Inc. is represented by:

          Michael Berta, Esq.
          ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
          10th Floor
          Three Embarcadero Center
          San Francisco, CA 94111-4024
          Telephone: 415-471-3100
          Email: michael.berta@arnoldporter.com

          - and -

          Sean Michael Callagy, Esq.
          Mark Christopher Fleming, Esq.
          WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
          60 State Street
          Boston, Massachusetts 02109
          Telephone: 617-526-6000
          Email: mark.fleming@wilmerhale.com

          - and -

          Benjamin S. Fernandez, Esq.
          WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
          1225 17th Street
          Suite 2600
          Denver, CO 80202
          Telephone: 720-274-3135
          Email: ben.fernandez@wilmerhale.com

                   About U.S.A. Dawgs Inc.

U.S.A. Dawgs Inc. -- https://www.usadawgs.com/ -- designs,
manufactures, and distributes footwear.  The company offers slip
resistant, casual working, safety, golf, spirit, and toning shoes;
sandals, flip flops, bendables, clogs, and Aussie style and cow
suede boots; and socks for men, women, boys, girls, and babies. The
company was founded in 2006 and is based in Las Vegas, Nevada.

U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc., filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D. Nev. Case No. 18-10453) on Jan. 31, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Steven Mann, president and CEO, the Debtor estimated $10
million to $50 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Laurel E. Davis.  The
Debtor is represented by Talitha B. Gray Kozlowski, Esq. and Teresa
M. Pilatowicz, Esq. of Garman Turner Gordon, LLP.

U.S.A. Dawgs filed a disclosure statement to accompany its plan of
reorganization dated June 5, 2018.




UBER TECHNOLOGIES: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B', Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on Uber
Technologies Inc. to 'B' from 'B-'. At the same time, S&P raised
its ratings on Uber's secured debt to 'B+' from 'B', and its
ratings on its unsecured debt to 'B-' from 'CCC+'.

S&P said, "Finally, we are assigning a 'B+' issue-level rating and
'2' recovery rating to the company's secured term loan due in 2027.
The company will use the proceeds to repay its secured term loan
due in 2023.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation for improving EBITDA
and cash flow as the company recovers from pandemic restrictions,
its strong cash balance, and valuable equity stakes.

"The upgrade reflects our expectation for positive EBITDA on a
quarterly basis in the second half of 2021 on a rebound in the
Mobility segment. The COVID-19 holiday surge has subsided, vaccines
are rolling out, and Delivery profitability is improved on higher
basket sizes and courier utilization. Mobility has proven resilient
as the segment EBITDA remained positive in the second quarter, and
the holiday surge merely stalled progress rather than setting it
back. We believe Mobility will return to pre-pandemic usage as
early as late 2021, as COVID-19 restrictions ease. We believe the
pandemic has caused a mostly permanent change in the acceptance of
local delivery services. The Delivery segment will sustain most of
its gains, allowing EBITDA to be positive as it exits 2021. We also
expect the companywide unadjusted free cash flow deficit will
narrow to about $2 billion in 2021 from $4 billion in 2020, and
reach break-even in 2022. This will be aided by its recent $1
billion cost reduction and the divestiture of its autonomous
driving research unit.

"In addition, voter approval of California's Proposition 22, which
guarantees drivers some benefits while maintaining their status as
independent contractors, removes a significant regulatory overhang.
We believe Uber will need to raise prices to cover new costs, but
that the trend toward increasing adoption of ride-sharing will
remain intact, as in New York City after it imposed minimum wages
and driver caps. We think the new law will likely serve as a model
for other jurisdictions that may consider restrictions on utilizing
independent contractors."

Finally, the company's strong unrestricted cash balance of $6.8
billion and equity stakes with nearly $10 billion of book value as
of Dec. 31, 2020, provide key support for the rating.

The raised issue-level ratings reflect the upgrade of Uber. Our
recovery rating on the company's secured debt remains '2' and our
recovery rating on its unsecured debt remains '5'. The new ratings
on Uber's extended term loan are the same as those on its secured
debt.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our confidence that EBITDA
and cash flow will improve upon recovery from COVID-19
restrictions, and that the company's cash and equity stakes provide
some cushion within the rating.

"We could raise the rating if we believe Uber is on track to
achieve our forecast for more than $1 billion of S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA in 2022 and about break-even unadjusted
cash flow. This would likely come from above-trend bookings growth
in Mobility of about 50% as the segment continues to recover from
COVID-19, and improving Delivery profitability on increasing
courier utilization and basket sizes.

"We could lower the rating if Uber sustains annual cash flow
deficits of multiple billions of dollars with uncertain prospects
for improvement due to increasing competition, adverse regulatory
actions, or a resurgence in COVID-19 cases that delays the recovery
in its Mobility business. The company might avoid a downgrade if it
sustains negative cash flow due to growth-related discretionary
investments we believe could be cut without hurting the core
ride-sharing and restaurant delivery businesses. This is provided
liquidity remains sufficient to fund operations and investments
necessary to achieve growth plans."


US CONSTRUCTION: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: US Construction Services, LLC
        1601 Dickenson Avenue E
        c/o Whitney Jones, Managing Member
        Dickinson, TX 77539

Business Description: US Construction Services, LLC is a privately
                      held company in the residential building
                      construction industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 19, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas

Case No.: 21-80029

Debtor's Counsel: Gabe Perez, Esq.
                  ZENDEH DEL & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
                  1813 61st Street 101
                  Galveston, TX 77551
                  Tel: (409) 740-1111
                  E-mail: gabe@zendehdel.com

Total Assets: $2,400,000

Total Debts: $1,262,826

The petition was signed by Whitney Jones, the managing member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's five unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/DODAQRY/US_Construction_Services_LLC__txsbke-21-80029__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


USA COMPRESSION: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B1 CFR
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of USA Compression Partners, LP and other ratings that are
associated with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted
through a portfolio review discussion held on February 17, 2021 in
which Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

USA Compression Partners, LP's (USAC) B1 Corporate Family Rating
reflects the extensive scale of its high-horsepower compression
fleet, which ranks the company among the largest third-party
providers of domestic natural gas compression services. A fee-based
contract structure insulates cash flow from commodity price
volatility, although 2020 experienced a modest utilization decline.
USAC incurred substantial increased debt levels to fund a 2018
acquisition which effectively doubled its size, although debt
leverage remains in a range appropriate for the partnership's
ratings.

The principal methodology used for this review was Global Oilfield
Services Industry Rating Methodology published in May 2017.


UTS UNDERGROUND: Has Until March 19 to File Reorganization Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge A. Jay Cristol of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida, Miami Division, gave UTS Underground
Trenchless Solutions, LLC until March 19, 2021, to file a Plan of
Reorganization.

The Debtor filed its Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to File
Plan of Reorganization on February 17, 2021.

                    About UTS Underground
                    Trenchless Solutions, LLC

UTS Underground Trenchless Solutions, LLC is alimited liability
company operating in the State of Florida and operating out of
Miami, Florida since October 2014.

UTS Underground Trenchless Solutions, LLC filed its voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-22675) on Nov. 19, 2020.  At the time of
filing, the Debtor had estimated $100,001 to $500,000 in assets and
500,001 to $1 million in liabilities. Christina Vilaboa-Abel, Esq.
at Cava Law, LLC serves as the Debtor's counsel.


VAMCO SHEET: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Vamco Sheet Metals, Inc.
        132-11 Bedell Street
        Jamaica, NY 11434

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 18, 2021

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York

Case No.: 21-40385

Judge: Hon. Jil Mazer-Marino

Debtor's Counsel: Alla Kachan, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF ALLA KACHAN, P.C.
                  3099 Coney Island Avenue
                  3rd Floor         
                  Brooklyn, NY 11235
                  Tel: (718) 513-3145
                  Fax: (347) 342-3156
                  E-mail: alla@kachanlaw.com

Total Assets: $1,099,467

Total Liabilities: $3,103,368

The petition was signed by Joyce Vettorino, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's two unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/PSUHYCY/Vamco_Sheet_Metals_Inc__nyebke-21-40385__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


VECTOR GROUP: Moody's Completes Review, Retains B2 CFR
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has completed a periodic review of the
ratings of Vector Group Ltd. and other ratings that are associated
with the same analytical unit. The review was conducted through a
portfolio review discussion held on February 9, 2021 in which
Moody's reassessed the appropriateness of the ratings in the
context of the relevant principal methodology(ies), recent
developments, and a comparison of the financial and operating
profile to similarly rated peers. The review did not involve a
rating committee. Since January 1, 2019, Moody's practice has been
to issue a press release following each periodic review to announce
its completion.

This publication does not announce a credit rating action and is
not an indication of whether or not a credit rating action is
likely in the near future. Credit ratings and outlook/review status
cannot be changed in a portfolio review and hence are not impacted
by this announcement.

Key rating considerations

Vector's credit profile (B2 CFR) reflects its relatively small
scale compared to larger U.S. tobacco companies and limited pricing
flexibility. The company participates in the deep discount
cigarette segment of an industry that is highly regulated. Vector's
credit profile also reflects its aggressive financial policy,
modest free cash flow and the ongoing threat of adverse tobacco
litigation and regulation. Partially offsetting these risks is
Vector's good track record of increasing EBITDA and improving share
in the US cigarette market. Additionally, the company holds a cost
advantage based on the beneficial terms provided under the Master
Settlement Agreement ("MSA"). Vector also has very good liquidity
with large cash balances and real estate investments that are
conservatively managed and a leading residential real estate
brokerage business (Douglas Elliman) that provides an additional,
albeit volatile, source of earnings diversification.

The principal methodology used for this review was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.  


VERSANT HEALTH: Moody's Hikes CFR From B3 Amid MetLife Acquisition
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has upgraded Superior Vision Insurance,
Inc.'s insurance financial strength rating to Aa3 from Ba3 and
Versant Health Holdco, Inc.'s corporate family rating to A3 from
B3, as the company has been acquired by MetLife, Inc. (A3 stable).
The ratings had been on review for upgrade (September 22, 2020)
since the deal was announced on September 17, 2020. The outlooks on
Versant and Superior are stable. Following the upgrade, Moody's
will withdraw Versant's corporate family rating as the associated
debt has been repaid in connection with its acquisition by
MetLife.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's upgrade reflects MetLife's ownership of Superior, resulting
in an alignment of the two company's ratings. Moody's anticipates
Superior will be integrated into MetLife's operations and become an
important part of one of MetLife's largest business line, the Group
Benefits business. The Group Benefits line offers life, dental,
group short- and long-term disability, individual disability,
accidental death and dismemberment, vision and accident and health
coverage, as well as prepaid legal plans. MetLife has holding
company liquidity of approximately $4.5 billion as of December 31,
2020.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Factors that could lead to an upgrade of the ratings on MetLife and
its subsidiaries include the following: Upgrade of MetLife's US
subsidiaries and/or ALICO's IFS rating; Adjusted financial leverage
(excluding AOCI) less than 20% range; Earnings and cash flow
coverage (includes both US and international) above 8x and 6x
times, respectively.

Factors that could lead to a downgrade include the following:
Downgrade of MetLife's US subsidiaries or ALICO's IFS rating;
Adjusted financial leverage (excluding AOCI) above 30%; Earnings
and cash flow coverage (includes both US and international) below
6x and 4x, respectively; Rapid growth of international operations
relative to the US with modest diversification benefit.

The following ratings were upgraded:

Issuer: Versant Health Holdco, Inc.

  corporate family rating to A3 from B3.

Issuer: Superior Vision Insurance, Inc.

insurance financial strength rating to Aa3 from Ba3.

Outlook actions

Issuer: Versant Health Holdco, Inc.

Outlook changed to Stable from Rating Under Review

Issuer: Superior Vision Insurance, Inc.

Outlook changed to Stable from Rating Under Review

MetLife, Inc. is headquartered in New York. As of December 31,
2020, MetLife reported total revenues of $67.8 billion and net
income available to its common shareholders of $5.2 billion. The
company reported total assets of about $795 billion and total
stockholders' equity of $75 billion.

Moody's insurance financial strength ratings are opinions of the
ability of insurance companies to pay punctually senior
policyholder claims and obligations.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was US Health
Insurance Companies Methodology published in November 2019.


VICTORY CAPITAL: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR, Alters Outlook to Positive
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Victory Capital Holdings
Inc. to positive from stable. At the same, time S&P affirmed its
'BB-' issuer credit rating on the company, and 'BB-' debt and '4'
recovery ratings on the company's senior secured term loan. The '4'
recovery rating indicates its expectation of average recovery (45%)
in the event of default.

S&P said, "The outlook revision reflects our view that leverage
will be lower than we previously forecast as a result of further
debt repayments along with higher EBITDA margins. The company
repaid $163.8 million in debt in 2020, expanded margins, and
boosted EBITDA. Altogether, Victory's credit profile has improved.
We forecast debt to EBITDA to trend below 3.0x on a weighted basis
(we do not net cash because of financial sponsor ownership).

"Absent another market drawdown, which is not our base case, we
think Victory will continue to deleverage through debt repayments.
We think there's a moderate risk that Victory pursues another
debt-funded acquisition due to the acquisitive nature of the
multi-boutique business model.

"Nevertheless, we believe the company is on a positive trajectory
and that its credit profile is improving. It recently announced
refinancing, which will lower the existing term loan rate to LIBOR
plus 2.25% from LIBOR plus 2.5%, will likely provide an additional
modest tailwind.

"The positive outlook reflects our expectation that leverage, as
measured by debt to EBITDA, will continue to trend lower than 3.0x
over the next 12 months through a combination of debt reduction and
EBITDA growth.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if operating performance
deteriorates so that leverage increases, either as a result of net
outflows or declines in assets under management (AUM). A
debt-funded acquisition or special dividend could also result in a
revision to a stable outlook, as could absolute leverage rising
above 5.0x."

An upgrade is contingent on leverage remaining sustainably below
3.0x, as would solid investment performance with flat net flows.


VILLAS OF WINDMILL: Objectors Say Trustee's Disclosures Ambiguous
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Merrilee Zawadzki and Joseph Mabe object to the Disclosure
Statement filed by Les S. Osborne, the operating trustee, for
debtor Villas of Windmill Point II Property Owners Association,
Inc.

Objectors are unit owners in the residential complex located in
Port Saint Lucie, Florida of which Villas of Windmill Point II
Property Owners Association, Inc., the Debtor, serves as the
property owners association. Should the Plan of Reorganization be
confirmed by the Court, it will have an impact on the unit owners
in the complex, such as Objectors.  

Objectors claim that the Disclosure Statement does not comply with
Bankruptcy Code Sec. 1125 as it does not contain adequate
information. There is information that is missing from the
Disclosure, that would be material for the unit owners such as
Objectors, and at other times the Disclosure is ambiguous.

Objectors point out that the Disclosure should indicate why the
Trustee will be controlling the funds which are property of the
reorganized Debtor and therefore should be in control of the new
Board.  Objectors assert that the Disclosure Statement is ambiguous
to the extent that it does not make clear whether professional fees
incurred by the trustee and his professionals post-confirmation are
subject to bankruptcy Court approval.  Objectors believe all such
fees and expenses should be subject to Bankruptcy Court approval.

Objectors further assert that the Disclosure in Article V
Description of the Plan indicates that the Class 1 creditors are
George Santulli and Carlo Patti, who each hold claims in the amount
of $185,703.  The Disclosure indicates that the Trustee intends to
pay these claims at $160,000.  It is unclear if the Trustee intends
to pay that amount to each of the Claimants, or is that amount the
total to be paid on account of both Claimants.

Objectors believe the Plan is not offered in good faith, and
therefore is not confirmable, pursuant to Sec. 1129(a)(3).

A full-text copy of Objectors' opposition dated Feb. 16, 2021, is
available at https://bit.ly/3dxBrYS from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.  

Attorneys for Objectors:

     BEHAR, GUTT & GLAZER, P.A.
     DCOTA, 1855 Griffin Road, Suite A-350
     Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33004
     Telephone: (954) 733-7030
     Email: bsb@bgglaw.com
     BRIAN S. BEHAR
     FBN: 727131

          About Villas of Windmill Point II Property

Based in Port Saint Lucie, Fla., Villas of Windmill Point II
Property Owners Association, Inc., is a non-profit corporation with
volunteers that self manages 89 separately deeded, single-family
residential villa units that are attached in four and five-unit
clusters within a Planned Unit Development (PUD).

Villas of Windmill filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
19-20400) on Aug. 2, 2019.  At the time of filing, the Debtor was
estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets and $1
million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Debtor is represented by Brian K. McMahon, Esq., in West Palm
Beach, Fla.

Leslie S. Osborne was appointed as the Debtor's Chapter 11 trustee.
The Trustee is represented by Rappaport Osborne Rappaport.


VISTA OUTDOOR: Moody's Hikes New 8-Yr. Unsecured Notes to B2
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Vista Outdoor Inc.'s new senior
unsecured 8-year notes' rating to B2 from B3. All other ratings for
the company including the B1 Corporate Family Rating and the B1-PD
Probability of Default rating remain unchanged. Moody's took no
action on the B3 rating on the existing $350 million senior
unsecured notes due 2023 as these notes will be repaid and Moody's
expects to withdraw the rating upon close. The outlook remains
positive and the Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating remains SGL-1.

The upgrade follows the company's announcement to upsize its new
senior notes to $500 million from $350 million and reflects
improved recovery for that class of debt given it now comprises a
higher share of the overall capital structure while the CFR is
unchanged. Net proceeds of the new notes will be used for general
corporate purposes and primarily for the refinancing of the
existing senior unsecured notes due 2023. The refinancing favorably
extends Vista's unsecured debt maturities to 2029 from 2023.
Moody's expects Vista will use excess proceeds from the transaction
to initially bolster liquidity and ultimately for investment and
acquisitions that increase the company's earnings base and
potential share repurchases. The CFR and positive outlook are not
affected because Vista's leverage remains low and earnings are
project to grow in 2021.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by the action:

Issuer: Vista Outdoor Inc.

Senior Unsecured Notes, upgraded to B2 (LGD5) from B3 (LGD5)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Vista's B1 CFR reflects its leading position as one of the largest
ammunition manufacturers in the US, its leading brands in multiple
niche outdoor product categories and favorable US outdoor activity
participation trends. The rating also reflects its low debt to
EBITDA leverage of 2.2x as of December 27, 2020 (pro-forma for the
upsizing of notes). Vista's credit profile is constrained by the
volatility in non-law-enforcement related ammunition demand,
difficulties sustaining organic revenue growth in the competitive
outdoor products market, and societal risks of its ammunition
products.

The ratings also reflect Moody's expectation that the company's
operating performance will remain strong over the next 12 to 18
months as ammunition demand remains robust and as the company
continues to work through its material backlog. The anxiety caused
by the pandemic and high political discord in the US will continue
to sustain demand for ammunition at higher levels as new gun owners
enter the market and existing owners stockpile ammunition.
Additionally, the company's outdoor segment will remain strong as
consumers continue to seek outdoor activities due to the
coronavirus. Moody's expects Vista's fiscal year ended March 2022
annual sales to reach $2.2 billion and EBITDA to improve to
approximately $290 to $300 million with Debt to EBITDA maintained
at around 2.0x.

The coronavirus outbreak, the government measures put in place to
contain it, and the weak global economic outlook continue to
disrupt economies and credit markets across sectors and regions.
Moody's analysis has considered the effect on the performance of
Vista from the current weak US economic activity and a gradual
recovery for the coming months. Although an economic recovery is
underway, it is tenuous, and its continuation will be closely tied
to containment of the virus. As a result, the degree of uncertainty
around our forecasts is unusually high. Moody's regards the
coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its ESG framework,
given the substantial implications for public health and safety.
The consumer durables industry is one of the sectors most
meaningfully affected by the coronavirus because of exposure to
discretionary spending.

Moody's believes social risk will remain high for Vista due to its
participation in the gun ammunition industry, although the risk has
decreased after its exit from firearms manufacturing after
divesting Savage Arms in July 2019.

Governance factors include a favorable financial policy including a
net debt-to-EBITDA target that was reduced in February to 1-2x
(based on the company's calculation). Vista also does not pay a
dividend, but share repurchases and potential debt-funded
acquisitions create some event risk.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that demand for
Vista's products will remain strong as ammunition sales continue to
surge to support the large backlog of orders. The outlook also
reflects Moody's expectation of a high likelihood that financial
leverage will be maintained at lower levels as EBITDA remains
robust for the next year and debt continues at the existing level.

Ratings could be downgraded if liquidity deteriorates, operating
performance declines materially after the ammunition demand
tailwind ends, the integration of the Remington assets weakens
Vista's earnings, or if management adopts a more aggressive
financial policy. Debt/EBITDA sustained above 4.0x, or adverse gun
industry regulations could also lead to a downgrade.

Ratings could be upgraded if Vista sustains stable ammunition
market share, produces organic growth with stable to higher margins
in the outdoor products segment, and achieves strong sustained
profitability from the ammunition business. Greater clarity
regarding the sustainability of higher ammunition demand and
earnings and strong free cash flow is necessary for an upgrade.
Vista would also need to sustain on average debt to EBITDA below
2.5x after taking into consideration demand volatility from its
ammunition business.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Consumer
Durables Industry published in April 2017.

Vista Outdoor Inc., based in Anoka, Minnesota, is a manufacturer
and marketer of ammunition and outdoor sports and recreation
products. The publicly-traded company produces a broad product line
for the biking, winter sports, hunting, shooting sports, wildlife
watching, archery, and golf markets. Major brands include Bushnell,
BLACKHAWK!, CamelBak, Federal, and Camp Chef. Sales were
approximately $2.1 billion for the last twelve months ending
December 27, 2020.


VISTA OUTDOOR: S&P Rates New $350MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'B+'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'B+' issue-level rating to Vista
Outdoor Inc.'s proposed $350 million senior unsecured notes
maturing 2029. The '3' recovery rating indicates its expectation
for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%) recovery in the
event of a payment default.

The proceeds will be used to refinance Vista's outstanding $350
million 5.875% senior unsecured notes due in 2023. S&P said, "All
our other ratings on the company, including the 'B+' issuer credit
rating, are unaffected because the transaction is leverage-neutral.
The positive outlook reflects our expectation that we could upgrade
Vista over the next year if it sustains improvements and its
financial policy remains conservative." Adjusted leverage was about
1.6x for the 12 months ended Dec. 27, 2020.

S&P's ratings on Vista reflect its leading market positions in
shooting sports and outdoor activities across a broad array of
prices and good product diversification. They also capture the
volatility of the ammunition category and input costs, and the
susceptibility to reduced consumer spending in an economic
downturn.

ISSUE RATINGS - RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

The debt capital structure consists of:

-- $450 million asset-based lending (ABL) facility due in 2023
(not rated).

-- New $350 million senior unsecured notes due in 2029.

S&P said, "Vista is a Delaware corporation, and substantially all
assets and operations are in the U.S. In the event of payment
default, we believe a bankruptcy protection filing would be in the
U.S. under the administration of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court system,
while entities abroad, if any, remain out of any insolvency
proceedings with respect to local jurisdictions.

"We believe creditors would receive maximum recovery in a payment
default scenario if Vista reorganized instead of liquidated. This
is because of the company's scale and leading market position in
its product categories, especially ammunition, and strong brand
portfolio. Therefore, in evaluating recovery prospects for
debtholders, we assume Vista continues as a going concern and
arrive at our emergence enterprise value by applying a multiple to
our assumed emergence EBITDA."

Simulated default assumptions

S&P's simulated default scenario assumes a payment default in 2025
caused by further deterioration in ammunition sales due to
heightened regulations or political factors, or a material
deterioration in operating performance because of a very weak
economy and lower discretionary spending. A combination of these
factors could reduce revenue and cash flow. Eventually, liquidity
and capital resources become strained to the point it cannot
continue to operate without an equity infusion or bankruptcy
filing.

Calculation of EBITDA at emergence:

-- Debt service: $26.2 million (default year interest plus
amortization)

-- Capital expenditure: $20.4 million

-- Default EBITDA proxy: $46.6 million

-- Cyclicality adjustment: $2.3 million (5% of default EBITDA
proxy for durables)

-- Preliminary emergence EBITDA: $48.9 million

-- Operational adjustment: $39.1 million (80%)

-- Emergence EBITDA: $88 million

S&P said, "Our emergence-level EBITDA of $88 million takes into
consideration an 80% operational adjustment (to reflect some
rebound in the ammunition market and cost-cutting efforts that
improve margins) on top of default-level EBITDA. We estimate a
gross valuation of $528 million, assuming a 6x EBITDA multiple."

Simplified waterfall

-- Emergence EBITDA: $88 million

-- Multiple: 6x

-- Gross recovery value: $528 million

-- Net recovery value for waterfall after administrative expenses
(5%): $501.6 million

-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 100%/0%

-- Estimated priority ABL claims: $276.1 million

-- Estimated senior unsecured claims: $357 million

-- Value available for unsecured claims: $225.5 million

    --Recovery range: 50%-70% (rounded estimate: 60%)



VISTA OUTDOOR: S&P Stays 'B+' Rating on Senior Unsecured Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that its 'B+' issue-level rating on Vista
Outdoor Inc.'s (B+/Positive/--) senior unsecured notes maturing
2029 is unchanged following an upsize of the amount to $500 million
from $350 million. However, S&P is revising the recovery rating to
'4' on the proposed upsized $500 million notes, indicating its
expectation for average (30%-50%; rounded estimate: 45%) recovery
in the event of a payment default, from '3' on the previously
proposed $350 million notes. All other terms, including the
maturity date, are the same.

Vista will use the proceeds to refinance its outstanding $350
million 5.875% senior unsecured notes due in 2023 and will deploy
the additional $150 million of proceeds opportunistically. S&P will
withdraw its existing issue level rating on the $350 million 5.875%
senior unsecured notes due 2023 upon completion of the transaction.
All its other ratings on the company, including the issuer credit
rating, are unaffected. The upsized transaction will result in a
net increase of approximately $150 million in debt and, pro forma
for the transaction, leverage will increase to about 2.1x from
about 1.6x for the 12 months ended Dec. 27, 2020.

ISSUE RATINGS - RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

The debt capital structure consists of:

-- $450 million asset-based lending (ABL) facility due in 2023
(not rated), and.

-- New $500 million senior unsecured notes due in 2029.

Vista is a Delaware corporation, and substantially all assets and
operations are in the U.S. In the event of payment default, S&P
believes a bankruptcy protection filing would be in the U.S. under
the administration of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court system, while
entities abroad, if any, remain out of any insolvency proceedings
with respect to local jurisdictions.

S&P said, "We believe creditors would receive maximum recovery in a
payment default scenario if Vista reorganized instead of
liquidated. This is because of the company's scale and leading
market position in its product categories, especially ammunition,
and strong brand portfolio. Therefore, in evaluating recovery
prospects for debtholders, we assume Vista continues as a going
concern and arrive at our emergence enterprise value by applying a
multiple to our assumed emergence EBITDA."

Simulated default assumptions

S&P's simulated default scenario assumes a payment default in 2025
caused by further deterioration in ammunition sales due to
heightened regulations or political factors, or a material
deterioration in operating performance because of a very weak
economy and lower discretionary spending. A combination of these
factors could reduce revenue and cash flow. Eventually, liquidity
and capital resources become strained to the point it cannot
continue to operate without an equity infusion or bankruptcy
filing.

Calculation of EBITDA at emergence:

-- Debt service: $26.2 million (default year interest plus
amortization)

-- Capital expenditure: $20.4 million

-- Default EBITDA proxy: $55.1 million

-- Cyclicality adjustment: $2.7 million (5% of default EBITDA
proxy for durables)

-- Preliminary emergence EBITDA: $57.8 million

-- Operational adjustment: $31.8 million (55%)

-- Emergence EBITDA: $89.6 million

S&P said, "Our emergence-level EBITDA of $89.6 million takes into
consideration an 55% operational adjustment (to reflect some
rebound in the ammunition market and cost-cutting efforts that
improve margins) on top of default-level EBITDA. We estimate a
gross valuation of $537.7 million, assuming a 6x EBITDA multiple."

Simplified waterfall

-- Emergence EBITDA: $89.6 million

-- Multiple: 6x

-- Gross recovery value: $537.7 million

-- Net recovery value for waterfall after administrative expenses
(5%): $510.8 million

-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 100%/0%

-- Estimated priority ABL claims: $276.1 million

-- Estimated senior unsecured claims: $511.3 million

-- Value available for unsecured claims: $234.7 million

    --Recovery range: 30%-50% (rounded estimate: 45%)


VMWARE INC: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' LT IDR & Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the ratings for VMware, Inc., including
the 'BB+' Long-Term Issuer Default Rating and 'BBB-'/'RR2' senior
unsecured ratings. Fitch also revised the Rating Outlook to Stable
from Negative. Fitch's actions affect $6 billion including the
undrawn $1 billion revolving credit facility.

The ratings and Outlook reflect VMware's solid operating and
standalone financial profile, driven by strong adoption of VMware's
as-a-service (aaS) solutions. Enterprise spending remained weak in
fiscal 2021, but work-from-home (WFH) dynamics stemming from the
coronavirus drove significant investments by service providers.
VMware continues to outgrow open source providers and Fitch expects
intermediate-term growth in the mid-single digits. Meanwhile, the
company's acquisitions of Pivotal and Carbon Black added new
capabilities in applications development and cloud security.

Fitch expects VMware will sustain profitability in the mid-30%, as
increasing scale in the VMware's services business will more than
offset, normalizing operating expenses after the company took cost
saving actions in the face of the coronavirus pandemic. FCF should
remain strong at $2.5 billion to $3.0 billion annually, and Fitch
believes it will be largely sufficient to fund share repurchases
and tuck-in acquisitions, although the company's strong credit
protection measures provide some headroom for incremental debt for
larger acquisitions.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Dell Ownership Risk: Dell Technologies Inc.'s ownership and voting
control continues to weigh on VMware's credit profile, even as the
companies evaluate a tax-free spinoff. Following the 2018 $11
billion special dividend, $9 billion of which used by Dell to
consolidate the then existing VMware tracking stock, a spinoff
would potentially include a VMware dividend sufficiently large
enough to ensure both companies separate with investment-grade
capital structures. The ownership structure supports the
equalization of their IDRs despite Fitch's belief VMware otherwise
would be rated at least three notches higher than Dell.

Strong FCF Profile: High recurring maintenance revenue, strong
profitability and low capital intensity should continue to support
strong annual FCF with margins in the 20%-25% range. Fitch
forecasts $2.5 billion to $3.0 billion of annual FCF, although
Fitch anticipates cash from unearned revenue increases to moderate
over time as the mix of subscription sales increases. Fitch expects
VMware will use FCF for a combination of tuck-in acquisitions and
share repurchases, although aggregate share repurchases and
consideration for acquisitions could exceed cash flow in fiscal
2022 given subdued fiscal 2021 spending.

Favorable Top-Line Drivers: Fitch believes secular demand from
customers migrating to the hybrid cloud and VMware and Dell
cross-selling a combined suite of offerings across a large and
diversified customer base will continue driving solid, long-term
revenue growth. Expansion into virtualized networking, software
defined storage and management, via acquisitions, provide
incremental customer penetration opportunities. The acquisitions of
Pivotal and Carbon Black in fiscal 2020 expand and strengthen
VMware's cloud business, adding a little over $1 billion of
subscription revenue.

Meaningful Investment Intensity: Fitch expects investment intensity
will remain fixed at roughly 20% of revenue as R&D investment
supports continued technology leadership, reflected by VMware's
strong market leadership positions. Fitch also believes high R&D
spending is required for cloud growth, particularly within the
context of a shifting competitive landscape as VMware faces a more
diversified set of competitors. These include off-premise compute
resources with considerably greater resources and financial
flexibility, including public cloud providers, Amazon Web Services
and Azure.

Solid Recovery: Fitch has notched the rating for the senior
unsecured notes offering up one to 'BBB-'/'RR2' from VMware's IDR
of 'BB+', given VMware's bondholders are structurally senior to
Dell's bondholders with respect to VMware's assets. Fitch believes
VMware's bondholders currently are well protected by the company's
enterprise value, even assuming a distressed trading multiple.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

On a standalone basis, VMware's technology leadership, large and
diversified installed customer base, and full suite of products and
services should drive consistent positive long-term organic revenue
growth and strong FCF support a strong investment grade rating.
However, as a majority owned subsidiary of comparatively weaker
Dell Technologies (BB+/Stable), Fitch derived the rating for VMware
within the context of Fitch's parent-subsidiary linkage criteria
and believes 'BB+' is appropriate, given the moderate to strong
linkage between the two entities.

Fitch believes the absence of restrictions on restricted payments
and inter-company loans more than offset the lack of upstream
guarantees and cross-default provisions or the existence of related
party governance structures on the Boards of Directors at VMware.

The company's 'BB+' rating mainly reflects Fitch's belief that
VMware's linkage with parent, Dell Technologies Inc., is moderate
and that governance mechanisms put in place at both VMware's and
Dell's Boards of Directors encumber but are insufficient to prevent
Dell from ultimately accessing VMware's assets in the absence of
restrictions on restricted payments (RP) or inter-company loans.

Fitch's Parent-Subsidiary Linkage Criteria govern the derivation of
VMware's ratings, given Dell's 80.4 economic and 97.4% voting
interests in VMware and consolidation of VMware's financial
statements, despite Fitch's belief VMware would be rated three to
four notches higher than Dell on a standalone basis.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Revenue grows by the mid-single digits, driven by continued
    momentum and services revenue offsetting declining license
    growth;

-- Revenue slows to low- to mid-single digits by FY23;

-- Profitability declines in FY22 from 36% operating EBITDA
    margins in FY21, driven by the normalization of operating
    expenses curtailed within the context of the pandemic and
    shifting mix to services business;

-- Unearned Revenue is roughly flat with the growing number of
    ratable bookings;

-- 3% capex to revenue beyond roughly $330 million in the current
    year;

-- $1 billion of acquisitions annually through the forecast
    period, adding only modest revenue and profitability;

-- FCF used for acquisitions and stock buybacks;

-- Debt maturities are refinanced and company issues $1 billion
    of debt in FY22 to support acquisitions or stock buybacks.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Dell's ratings are upgraded, given Fitch's conclusion that
    Dell's and VMware's parent-subsidiary linkage is moderate;

-- VMware explicitly ring fences its cash and cash flows by
    adding language to its credit agreement and indentures
    restricting payments and intercompany loans.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Dell's ratings are downgraded due to slower than expected
    deleveraging or erosion in operating results;

-- Incremental permanent debt to fund shareholder returns or pay
    a dividend outpace profitability growth, resulting in
    expectations for total leverage sustained above 2.5x at
    VMware.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Solid Liquidity: Fitch believes VMware's liquidity remains adequate
and, as of Oct. 30, 2020, was supported by $3.9 billion of cash and
cash equivalents and an undrawn $1 billion revolving credit
facility expiring on Sept. 12, 2022. Fitch's expectation for $2.5
billion to $3.0 billion of annual FCF also supports liquidity.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

VMware, Inc. has an ESG Relevance Score of 4 for Governance
Structure due to Dell Technologies, Inc.'s ownership concentration,
which has a negative impact on VMware's credit profile, and is
relevant to the ratings in conjunction with other factors.

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


VOYAGER AVIATION: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa1, Put on Further Review
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has downgraded the corporate family and
long-term senior unsecured ratings of Voyager Aviation Holdings,
LLC, to Caa1 and Caa3, respectively, from B3 and Caa2,
respectively. The ratings were also placed on review for further
downgrade. These rating actions follow Voyager's announcement that
it has reached an agreement in principle with holders of more than
a majority of its 8.5% senior notes due August 2021 and holders of
100% of its equity to commence a debt restructuring.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Voyager Aviation Holdings, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa1 from B3; Placed Under
Review for further Downgrade

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to Caa3 from
Caa2; Placed Under Review for further Downgrade

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Voyager Aviation Holdings, LLC

Outlook, Changed To Rating Under Review From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE / FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR
DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's downgrade of Voyager's ratings reflects the increased
probability that the firm's restructuring of its $415 million
senior unsecured notes due August 2021 could be a distressed
exchange under Moody's definition, which could result in material
losses to existing holders of the notes. The ratings were also
placed on review for further downgrade pending disclosure of the
terms of the debt restructuring, which Moody's expects will provide
additional clarity regarding the specific effects of the
restructuring on noteholders.

Voyager management has reported since last year that it is pursuing
various alternatives to enhance the company's cash position and
either repay or refinance the August senior notes maturity. Most of
Voyager's funding is provided by amortizing non-recourse secured
debt whose debt service is supported by the cash flows generated by
pledged aircraft and associated leases. However, the company's
small fleet of 18 aircraft, the collateral pledge of all of its
aircraft, as well as lenders' shift to more conservative loan
underwriting in the current weakened operating environment has
limited Voyager's ability to generate sufficient funds to repay the
senior notes at maturity. Unlike higher rated aircraft leasing
companies, Voyager has no committed back-up line of credit to cover
liquidity contingencies. However, apart from the upcoming debt
maturity, Moody's estimates that Voyager has sufficient cash
liquidity on hand to conduct its business activities.

Voyager's ratings reflect the company's small competitive scale
compared to rated peers, higher aircraft and airline lessee
concentrations, and limited alternate liquidity but also the
relatively low average age and long average remaining lease term of
the company's aircraft fleet and the stronger average credit
quality of the company's airline customers. A high percentage of
Voyager's customers are "flag" carriers that have received capital
support and should better endure the downturn in air travel
compared to weaker competitors. However, the company continues to
work with a certain airline customer whose rental payments are in
arrears, representing a material proportion of Voyager's revenues.

Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its
environmental, social and governance (ESG) framework, given the
substantial implications for public health and safety. The rating
action reflect the negative effects on Voyager of the breadth and
severity of the shock, and the deterioration in credit quality,
profitability, capital and liquidity it has triggered.

The ratings could be confirmed upon completion of the review if the
company demonstrates that it has sufficient liquidity to repay its
August 2021 senior notes, as well as meet other operating and
financial liquidity requirements over the outlook horizon, and
generates positive operating cash flow.

Moody's could further downgrade Voyager's ratings upon completion
of the review if the company: 1) is not able to refinance or
accumulate sufficient funds to repay its August 2021 $415 million
senior notes or imposes losses on noteholders associated with its
debt restructuring; 2) significantly increases its debt-to-tangible
net worth ratio; or 3) experiences deteriorating operating
prospects including from a disruption in air travel and weakening
of airline credit quality.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Finance
Companies Methodology published in November 2019.


VOYAGER AVIATION: S&P Cuts ICR to 'CCC-' on Restructuring Plans
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on aircraft
operating lessor Voyager Aviation Holdings LLC to 'CCC-' from 'CCC'
and its issue-level rating on its senior unsecured notes to 'C'
from 'CC'. S&P's recovery rating on the notes remains '6'.

At the same time, S&P is placing all its ratings on the company on
CreditWatch with negative implications. The CreditWatch placement
reflects the likelihood of a further downgrade to 'CC' if, when
terms of the restructuring are available, it conclude they will be
equivalent to a distressed exchange and tantamount to default when
implemented.

The downgrade follows Voyager's announcement that it intends to
restructure its debt. On Feb. 17, 2021, Voyager announced that it
has reached an agreement in principle with a majority of its
bondholders and all its equity holders to commence a debt
restructuring transaction.

The company now has only about six months until its $415 million of
senior unsecured notes mature on Aug. 15, 2021. Unlike most other
rated aircraft lessors, which have substantial unencumbered assets,
access to credit facilities, and have recently raised large amounts
of unsecured debt, Voyager does not have unencumbered assets or
access to any credit facilities.

Therefore, while details of the proposed restructuring are not yet
available, S&P believes the nearing maturity and limited access to
other refinancing options would incentivize the company's
debtholders to accept terms that its would characterize as
distressed and tantamount to default.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors for this
credit rating change:

-- Health and safety

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating,
uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its
economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are
gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which
will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social
and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed
economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging
markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by
year-end or later. S&P said, "We use these assumptions about
vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications
associated with the pandemic. As the situation evolves, we will
update our assumptions and estimates accordingly."

CreditWatch

S&P said, "The negative CreditWatch placement reflects the
likelihood of a further downgrade to 'CC' if we characterize the
terms of the proposed restructuring as equivalent to a distressed
exchange and tantamount to default. In that event, we would then
lower the rating to 'SD' (selective default) when the restructuring
is completed."


WALKER RADIO: Gets OK to Hire Media Services Group as Broker
------------------------------------------------------------
Walker Radio Group, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ Media Services
Group, Inc. as its broker.

The firm will assist the Debtor in selling all of its assets, which
comprise the KRBL radio station.

The firm will receive a commission equal to 6 percent of total
consideration of the sale.

Media Services is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14), according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     William L. Whitley
     Media Services Group, Inc.
     1131 Rockingham Drive #209
     Richardson, TX 75080
     Phone: 972-231-4500
     Fax: 972-231-4509
     Email: whitley@mediaservicesgroup.com

                     About Walker Radio Group

Walker Radio Group, LLC filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Texas Case No.
20-50234) on Dec. 9, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
had estimated assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and
liabilities of between $500,001 and $1 million.  

Judge Robert L. Jones oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Mullin Hoard & Brown, LLP as its legal counsel
and Howard, Cunningham, Houchin & Turner, LLP as its accountant.


WASHINGTON MUTUAL: Griffin Objection Overrule Affirmed by 3rd Cir.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, will affirm the
ruling of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware,
which in turn, affirmed the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware's overruling of an objection filed by Alice Griffin.

Alice Griffin was a holder of Washington Mutual, Inc. preferred
stock, whose shares were cancelled pursuant to WMI's 2012 plan of
reorganization.  Under the plan, Griffin and other preferred
shareholders became members of "Class 19," the plan's "Preferred
Equity Interest" class.  

In 2019, Griffin objected to a settlement that diluted her
interests in Class 19.  That settlement, negotiated by the appellee
Liquidating Trust in 2013, allowed a disputed $72 million claim
brought by certain securities underwriters.  The Bankruptcy Court
overruled Griffin's objection.  On appeal, the District Court
affirmed.  Griffin now appeals a second time, alleging multiple
errors.

"The Bankruptcy Court overruled Griffin's objection on two grounds.
It stated first: 'I believe that the equitable doctrine of laches
precludes this objection from being prosecuted at this time,' i.e.,
six years after the settlement.  Second, it explained that even if
laches did not apply, Griffin's objection failed on the merits
because 'th[e] settlement was not in bad faith, was not a breach of
fiduciary duty, but really was a proper exercise of the liquidating
trust[`s] obligation under the trust agreement.'  The District
Court affirmed on the second ground, noting that 'the Bankruptcy
Court's decision adequately rests on its approval of the merits of
the settlement'... Griffin contends this was error.  In her view,
laches was 'the sole basis' for the Bankruptcy Court's decision and
'the District Court was required to review [it].'  We disagree.
Where 'two independent reasons support a decision, neither can be
considered obiter dictum; each represents a valid holding of the
court.'  Here, the Bankruptcy Court analyzed the merits at length.
It considered the four factors this Court has identified as
governing the approval of settlements in bankruptcy.  It concluded
that 'all those factors support approval of the final settlement by
a liquidating trustee.'  The Bankruptcy Court then stated that if
the settlement had been submitted for approval, it 'would have
approved it.'  Griffin cannot credibly dismiss these conclusions as
judicial 'musings.'  The record demonstrates that they were rather
'independent reasons support[ing] [the] decision.'  Accordingly, it
was 'a valid holding' of the Bankruptcy Court that Griffin's
objection failed on the merits," said the Court.  

"'[T]he ultimate issue on appeal is whether the [B]ankruptcy
[C]ourt abused its discretion when it []approved the compromise'
between the Trust and the underwriters.  That compromise did two
things.  First, it disallowed from Class 18 (ahead of Griffin) a
$24 million indemnification claim related to the underwriting of
WMI debt securities.  Second, it allowed in Class 19 (Griffin's
class) a $72 million indemnification claim related to the
underwriting of WMI equity securities.  In considering whether to
approve this settlement, the Bankruptcy Court was required 'to
assess and balance the value of the claim[s] . . . being
compromised against the value to the estate of the acceptance of
the compromise proposal.'  Four factors guide this assessment: '(1)
the probability of success in litigation; (2) the likely
difficulties in collection; (3) the complexity of the litigation
involved, and the expense, inconvenience and delay necessarily
attending it; and (4) the paramount interest of the creditors.'  We
find no abuse of discretion in the Bankruptcy Court's consideration
of these factors, and we agree they favor approval of the
settlement," the Court held.

The case is In re: WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., Debtors. ALICE
GRIFFIN, Appellant, Case No. 20-1725 (3rd Cir.).  A full-text copy
of the Opinion, dated February 11, 2021, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/3hf4vg8m from Leagle.com.

                    About Washington Mutual

Based in Seattle, Washington, Washington Mutual Inc. --
http://www.wamu.com/-- was the holding company for Washington  
Mutual Bank as well as numerous non-bank subsidiaries.

Washington Mutual Bank was taken over on Sept. 25, 2008, by U.S.
government regulators. The next day, WaMu and its affiliate, WMI
Investment Corp., filed separate petitions for Chapter 11 relief
(Bankr. D. Del. 08-12229 and 08-12228, respectively). WaMu owned
100% of the equity in WMI Investment.

When WaMu filed for protection from its creditors, it disclosed
assets of $32,896,605,516 and debts of $8,167,022,695. WMI
Investment estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion with zero
debts.

WaMu was represented in the Chapter 11 case by Brian Rosen, Esq.,
at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP in New York City; Mark D. Collins,
Esq., at Richards, Layton & Finger P.A. in Wilmington, Del.; and
Peter Calamari, Esq., and David Elsberg, Esq., at Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP.  The Debtor tapped Valuation
Research Corporation as valuation service provider for certain
assets.

Fred S. Hodara, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Fled LLP in New
York, and David B. Stratton, Esq., at Pepper Hamilton LLP in
Wilmington, Del., represented the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors. Stephen D. Susman, Esq., at Susman Godfrey LLP and
William P. Bowden, Esq., at Ashby & Geddes, P.A., represented the
Equity Committee.  The official committee of equity security
holders also tapped BDO USA as its tax advisor. Stacey R. Friedman,
Esq., at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP and Adam G. Landis, Esq., at
Landis Rath & Cobb LLP in Wilmington, Del., represented JPMorgan
Chase, which acquired the WaMu bank unit's assets prior to the
Petition Date.

Records filed Jan. 24, 2012, say that Washington Mutual Inc.,
former owner of the biggest U.S. bank to fail, has spent $232.8
million on bankruptcy professionals since filing its Chapter 11
case in September 2008.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter on March 21, 2012, the
Debtors disclosed that their Seventh Amended Joint Plan of
Affiliated Debtors, as modified, and as confirmed by order, dated
Feb. 23, 2012, became effective, marking the successful completion
of the Chapter 11 restructuring process.




WASHINGTON PRIME: Fitch Lowers LongTerm IDR to 'C'
--------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDRs) of Washington Prime Group, Inc. and Washington Prime Group,
L.P. (collectively WPG) to 'C' from 'CC'. Fitch has also downgraded
WPG's senior secured revolver and terms loans to 'CCC-'/'RR2' from
'CCC'/'RR2' and the senior unsecured notes to 'C'/'RR4' from
'CC'/'RR4'.

The downgrades reflect WPG's announcement of its election to not
make the required interest payment on its 6.45% senior unsecured
notes due 2024 and the consequent 30-day grace period before
nonpayment constitutes an event of default under the indenture
governing this instrument.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Eroding Cash Flows: Fitch expects WPG's operating performance to
deteriorate further in the near term. Operating performance has
been diminished by negative retailer trends, specifically
department store anchor closures and bankruptcies within the
company's mall portfolio that have induced incremental occupancy
and rental income losses through co-tenancy clauses.

Weak Relative Capital Access: WPG's access to capital has been
limited to its revolving bank credit facility, which was
effectively fully drawn during 2Q20. Fitch believed the company's
open-air unencumbered pool had material value, but the pool
remaining after the waiver is unlikely to garner significant
interest from third-party capital. Fitch does not expect lenders to
have a significant appetite for retail real estate that does not
have a significant grocer component or other essential use.

Fitch anticipates operating performance deterioration will
necessitate a debt exchange or bankruptcy event prior to the
maturity of its credit facility in December 2022.

Recovery Ratings: Fitch's recovery analysis assumes WPG would be
considered a going concern in bankruptcy and the company would be
reorganized rather than liquidated. Fitch determines a
post-reorganization NOI produced by the following three segments of
operating real estate to determine the recoverable value
attributable to the associated debt obligations: NOI encumbered by
75% of credit facility; asset-level encumbered NOI (mortgage debt);
remaining unencumbered NOI (25% of credit facility, unsecured bond
and deficiency claims).

Stressed capitalization rates are individually applied to the
post-reorganization NOI produced by each assets type (Tier I malls,
Tier II/noncore malls, open air) to determine the estimated
recoverable value of each segment of the operating real estate
portfolio. The capitalization rates are based on views of asset
quality and current market conditions plus an additional stress to
reflect further downside risk in the real estate portfolio. The
stressed cap rates applied to each asset tier are as follows: Tier
I malls, 20.0%; Tier II and noncore malls, 30.4%; open-air centers,
11.0%.

Restricted cash and mortgage escrows are assigned to mortgaged
assets. Discounted book value of equity in UJV interest,
construction in progress and tenant receivables are added to the
gross recoverable value of unencumbered assets. Administrative
costs of 10% are taken from each subset of gross recoverable value
before being applied to the outstanding debt balance.

Fitch assumes WPG's $650 million revolving credit facility is fully
drawn in a bankruptcy scenario, and includes that amount in the
claims waterfall. Any amount not recovered by the secured credit
facility claim is considered a deficiency claim and added to
existing unsecured claims to share in the net recoverable value of
the unencumbered portfolio and non-operating assets on a pro rata
basis.

The distribution of value yields a recovery ranked in the 'RR2'
category for the senior secured revolver and term loans based on
Fitch's expectation of recovery for the obligations in the 71%-90%
range, the 'RR4' category for the senior unsecured bonds based on
recovery in the 31%-50% range, and the 'RR6' category for the
preferred stock based on recovery in the 0%-10% range. Under
Fitch's Recovery Criteria, these recoveries result in notching two
levels above the IDR for the secured revolver and term loans to
'CCC-', and notching level with the IDR at 'C' for the unsecured
bond and preferred stock.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

WPG's relative levels of occupancy, SSNOI growth, leasing spreads
and tenant sales productivity in its consolidated mall portfolio
are considerably weaker than A-mall REIT peers. WPG's open-air
retail assets have generally performed well based on reported
occupancy levels and SSNOI growth.

WPG exhibited some capital access prior to the pandemic, but Fitch
believes the company now has limited to no options to access
external capital following the collateralization of its credit
facility.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

-- Further occupancy loss in fiscal 2021 (Tier I and open-air
    assets) due to ramp up of cotenancy clause activation as
    closures of department stores continue to accelerate (e.g.
    Macy's, J.C. Penney);

-- Mortgage refinancing requires partial principal reduction or
    additional contingencies in many cases as lending continues to
    retreat from the mall property type.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factor that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

-- Resolution of the interest nonpayment within the grace period,
    without the uses of a distressed debt exchange (DDE).

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

-- Commencement of a DDE;

-- Announcement that the issuer entered into bankruptcy filings,
    administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal
    winding-up procedure, or otherwise ceased business.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Fitch estimates WPG's sources of liquidity are insufficient to
cover its uses through fiscal 2021. WPG's credit facility amendment
requires a minimum cash balance on hand of $65 million, inclusive
of the company's shares of unconsolidated joint venture cash,
limiting the flexibility of its cash balance that stood at more
than $112 million as of Sept. 30, 2020. Remaining availability
under its $650 million revolver is only $3 million.

Capex has become nondiscretionary as the company combats the loss
of competitive positioning of its asset base, and these costs will
demand the vast majority of the company's deteriorating operating
cash flow. Fitch believes the maturing mortgage debt for assets
that are not returned to lenders will require some form of capital
commitment or principal paydown to extend the maturity even in
short-term increments, such as 12-month extensions.

Fitch defines liquidity coverage as sources of liquidity divided by
uses of liquidity. Sources include unrestricted cash, availability
under revolving credit facility and retained cash flow from
operating activities after dividends. Uses include pro rata debt
maturities, expected recurring capex and forecast (re)development
costs.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of '3'. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
either due to their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.


WELDED CONSTRUCTION: Court Orders Production of 196 Documents
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher S. Sontchi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware denied the Motion for
Clarification/Reconsideration of Order Granting Welded's Motion to
Compel Production of Audit Documents filed by Defendants The
Williams Companies, Inc., Williams Partners Operating LLC, and
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.

In April 2018, Transco retained consultant Oil and Gas Contracts
Services ("OGCS") to perform an audit of Welded Construction,
L.P.'s invoices to Transco in connection with the Atlantic Sunrise
Project.  Beginning June 29, 2018, the Audit was directed by
in-house and outside counsel for Defendants in anticipation of
litigation.  Litigation commenced on October 5, 2018, when
Defendants filed a complaint in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Oklahoma. Welded's bankruptcy petition
was filed shortly thereafter, on October 18, 2018.

On January 31, 2019, OGCS issued the Audit Report to Defendants'
attorneys, analyzing Welded's invoices through August 2018.  As
Welded had not yet submitted its invoices for either September or
October 2018, the Audit Report provided only estimates for those
months.  OGCS was provided with Welded's September and October 2018
true-up invoices on March 27, 2019, and the revised versions of
those invoices on May 23, 2019.  On June 9, 2019, the Audit was
complete and the Defendants' attorneys were given an update to the
Audit Findings, which included the September and October 2018
true-up invoices.

On October 28, 2019, Welded filed its Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment.  In opposition to the Summary Judgment Motion, Defendants
submitted, among other things, the Declaration of Phil Burke of
OGCS, where Mr. Burke discussed the Audit at length.  On June 8,
2020, the Court issued its Opinion, denying the Summary Judgment
Motion.

On January 8, 2020, after completion of briefing on the Summary
Judgment Motion and submission of the 2019 Burke Declaration,
Welded served Defendants with document requests, seeking documents
pertaining to the Audit.  On March 16, 2020, Welded served OGCS
with a subpoena, seeking documents pertaining to the Audit.  In
response to Welded's discovery requests, and in reliance on
Defendants' attorneys' direction of the Audit in anticipation of
litigation, Defendants objected to and withheld from production
responsive documents that were in the Defendants and OGCS' custody
from June 29, 2018 and thereafter.  Defendants and OGCS, however,
produced the non-privileged documents responsive to Welded's
written discovery for the period prior to June 29, 2018.

On July 27, 2020, Welded filed Welded's Motion to Compel Production
of Audit Documents.  Throughout the Motion to Compel, Welded argued
its right to discovery in connection with the substance, findings
and conclusions of the Audit.  Defendants opposed the Motion to
Compel on the grounds that, among other things, the materials
sought were protected by the attorney-client privilege and work
product doctrine, Defendants did not waive those protections, and
Welded did not make the showing required by Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(b)(3).  

On September 9, 2020, the Court granted Welded's Motion to Compel.
In so ruling, the Court cited its reliance on the 2019 Burke
Declaration, which contained a detailed exhibit identifying the
'true up' amounts owed as concluded by the Audit.  The Court
identified Defendants' reliance on the "Audit's conclusions" as set
forth in the 2019 Burke Declaration as grounds for granting the
motion to compel and ordering production of "the underlying
documents."

In October 2020, Defendants and OGCS produced to Welded 2,534
documents previously retained as protected by the attorney-client
privilege and/or the work product doctrine.  However, Defendants
retained 196 documents on grounds that they constitute "Opinion
Work Product,"  which are afforded almost absolute protection from
discovery — even in the context of an implied waiver — and were
not, in Defendants' minds, covered by the Order Compelling
Production.  In the Reconsideration Motion, Defendants are seeking
clarification and a ruling from the Court that the 196 documents
constitute protected Opinion Work Product.

"Here, there is no change in intervening law and no new evidence.
Although not explicit (in fact, Defendants never discuss the
controlling standard governing their request in the Reconsideration
Motion), Defendants allege that there would be manifest injustice
if the Opinion Work Product is produced.  However, the underlying
issue of the work product doctrine is not new.  Furthermore,
Defendants are raising an argument they could and should have
raised in response to the Motion to Compel, in which Welded
specifically requested production of documents containing the
'mental impressions, opinions, and theories of counsel.'  Moreover,
this issue was considered and rejected in the Motion to Compel...
the Court found: that 'the Defendants have complete[ly] waived the
protection of the attorney client privilege and work product
doctrine in connection with the Audit.'  The Court then ordered
that '[t]he Defendants shall produce and instruct OGCS to produce,
without redaction, all documents related to the Audit,'" Judge
Sontchi explains.  "While the Court believes that its prior ruling
clearly included Opinion Work Product and required its production,
it will, nonetheless, specifically address the issue here.  Rule
26(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure establishes two
tiers of protection: first, work prepared in anticipation of
litigation by an attorney or his agent is discoverable only upon a
showing of need and hardship; second, 'core' or 'opinion' work
product that encompasses the 'mental impressions, conclusions,
opinion, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative
of a party concerning the litigation' is 'generally a!orded near
absolute protection from discovery'... Here, Defendants
substantially relied on the Audit in representations to Welded and
the Court.  Defendants have asserted that the Audit 'revealed
wrongdoing' and repeatedly sought specific relief because of the
Audit, including through the Oklahoma Complaint, Transco's proof of
claim... Transco's counterclaims, the 2019 Burke Declaration, and
the Defendant's summary judgment response.  Defendants also
repeatedly represented to Welded and the Court that the Audit was
independent.  In other words, Defendants cannot disclose as much as
the Audit as it pleases and then claim privilege to the rest," he
explains further.

"Defendants hired OGCS to audit and to investigate Welded billing
practices in anticipation of litigation.  OGCS's sole role was to
investigate and to perform an audit.  Furthermore, Defendants used
the Audit to make allegations, claims and defenses (including
through the Oklahoma Complaint, the Proof of Claim, Transco's
counterclaims, the 2019 Burke Declaration, and the Defendant's
summary judgment response)... Defendants cannot use OGCS's report
as both a sword and a shield — Defendants cannot place the Audit
at issue and claim that the Audit 'revealed wrongdoing' and then
not give Welded the requisite information to test the validity of
those statements," Judge Sontchi held.  He ordered the Defendants
to produce the 196 documents that were held back as "Opinion Work
Product" within 14 days from the issuance of his Order.

The case is IN RE: WELDED CONSTRUCTION, L.P., Chapter 11, et al.,
Debtors. WELDED CONSTRUCTION, L.P., Plaintiffs, v. THE WILLIAMS
COMPANIES, INC., WILLIAMS PARTNERS OPERATING LLC, and
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, Defendants, Case No.
18-12378 CSS, Adv. Pro. No. 19-50194 (CSS) (Bankr. D. Del.).  A
full-text copy of the Memorandum Order, dated February 15, 2021, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/2kzmts63 from Leagle.com.

                    About Welded Construction

Perrysburg, Ohio-based Welded Construction, L.P., is a mainline
pipeline construction contractor capable of executing pipeline
construction projects in lengths ranging from a few hundred feet to
over 200 miles.

Welded Construction, L.P., and Welded Construction Michigan, LLC,
sought bankruptcy protection on Oct. 22, 2018 (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 18-12378). The jointly administered cases are pending
before Judge Kevin Gross.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as counsel;
and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and noticing agent
and administrative advisor. The Debtors also tapped Zolfo Cooper
Management, LLC and the firm's managing director Frank Pometti who
will serve as their chief restructuring officer.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed on Oct.
30, 2018.  The committee tapped Blank Rome LLP as its legal counsel
and Teneo Capital LLC as its investment banker and financial
advisor.


WINDSTREAM HOLDINGS: Too Late to Revisit Vendor Pay, Court Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that the Second Circuit has ruled it's too late for
a Windstream Holdings creditor to challenge a judge's approval of
vendor payments in the cable provider's Chapter 11 case, saying
revisiting the decision would put tens of millions of dollars in
already-paid claims into question.

In an unpublished opinion Thursday, February 18, 2021, the panel
found that waste management contractor GLM DFW Inc.'s argument the
bankruptcy judge should have taken a much closer look at
Windstream's request to make priority payments of more than $184
million in vendor claims was equitably moot, given that the
company's bankruptcy plan was approved eight months ago, June 2020.


                   About Windstream Holdings

Windstream Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiaries provide advanced
network communications and technology solutions for businesses
across the United States. They also offer broadband, entertainment
and security solutions to consumers and small businesses primarily
in rural areas in 18 states.

Windstream Holding Inc. and its subsidiaries filed for bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-22312) on Feb. 25,
2019.

The Debtors had total assets of $13,126,435,000 and total debt of
$11,199,070,000 as of Jan. 31, 2019.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP as counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial advisor
and investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as
restructuring advisor; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants as notice
and claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on March 12, 2019. The committee tapped
Morrison & Foerster LLP as its legal counsel, AlixPartners, LLP, as
its financial advisor, and Perella Weinberg Partners LP as
investment banker.


WOODMONT 2017-2: S&P Assigns Prelim BB(sf) Rating on Cl. E-R Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to the class
A-1-R, A-2-R, B-R, C-R, D-R, and E-R replacement notes from
Woodmont 2017-2 Trust, a collateralized loan obligation (CLO)
originally issued in 2017 that is managed by MidCap Financial
Services Capital Management LLC. The replacement notes will be
issued via a proposed supplemental indenture.

The preliminary ratings reflect S&P's opinion that the credit
support available is commensurate with the associated rating
levels.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of Feb. 18,
2020. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

On the March 10, 2021, refinancing date, the proceeds from the
issuance of the replacement notes are expected to redeem the
original notes. S&P said, "At that time, we anticipate withdrawing
the ratings on the original notes and assigning ratings to the
replacement notes. However, if the refinancing doesn't occur, we
may affirm the ratings on the original notes and withdraw our
preliminary ratings on the replacement notes."

The replacement notes are being issued via a proposed conforming
indenture, which, in addition to outlining the terms of the
replacement notes, will also:

-- Issue the replacement class A-1-R, A-2-R, B-R, C-R, and D-R
notes at a lower spread than the original notes;

-- Extend the stated maturity, reinvestment period, and non-call
period by about 4.75, 3.75, and 1.75 years; and

-- Added workout loan-related concepts in line with recent
Woodmont Trust CLOs.

S&P said, "Our review of this transaction included a cash flow
analysis, based on the portfolio and transaction as reflected in
the trustee report, to estimate future performance. In line with
our criteria, our cash flow scenarios applied forward-looking
assumptions on the expected timing and pattern of defaults, and
recoveries upon default, under various interest rate and
macroeconomic scenarios. In addition, our analysis considered the
transaction's ability to pay timely interest or ultimate principal,
or both, to each of the rated tranches.

"We will continue to review whether, in our view, the ratings
assigned to the notes remain consistent with the credit enhancement
available to support them, and we will take further rating actions
as we deem necessary."

  Preliminary Ratings Assigned

  Woodmont 2017-2 Trust

  Replacement class A-1-R, $696.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Replacement class A-2-R, $24.00 million: AAA (sf)
  Replacement class B-R, $96.50 million: AA (sf)
  Replacement class C-R (deferrable), $96.00 million: A (sf)
  Replacement class D-R (deferrable), $72.00 million: BBB (sf)
  Replacement class E-R (deferrable), $59.00 million: BB (sf)
  Subordinated notes. $162.20 million: Not rated


WORLD ACCEPTANCE: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B', Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings upgraded World Acceptance Corp.'s issuer credit
rating to 'B' from 'B-'. The outlook is stable.

World Acceptance's operating performance has benefitted from strong
fiscal stimulus and a decline in portfolio mix of newer customers.
As of Dec. 31, 2020, the company's year-to-date charge-off rate
declined to 14.7% from 17.1% the year prior, and its provision for
credit losses as a percentage of revenue declined to 21.3% from
35%. Further, the company was able to amend the covenants on its
revolving credit facility, which has substantially improved its
covenant cushions, specifically its fixed-charge coverage ratio,
which must be at least 275% and is now over 310%.

Leverage has increased to 1.7x debt to adjusted total equity as of
Dec. 31, 2020, up from 1.3x as of March 31, 2020. The company
significantly increased debt in the period, primarily using the
proceeds to repurchase equity. In the second quarter of fiscal
2020, the company was able resolve an investigation into a
potential violation of the foreign corrupt practices act (FCPA)
related to its Mexico operations by paying $21.7 million in
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.

The company no longer maintains operations in Mexico. However, it
still has significant regulatory risk both from a federal and state
level in the U.S. Given new leadership at the Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, new directives could impact some of World
Acceptance's installment loans. Further, on a state level, there is
a proposal for a 36% interest rate cap in Illinois--the state
currently makes up approximately 6% of the company's revenue, and
the approximate average interest rate for those loans is 60%.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that over
the next 12 months World Acceptance will maintain leverage as
measured by debt to adjusted total equity between 1.5x-2.0x. Our
base-case expectation is that the company continues to operate with
charge-offs well below 18% and that the company maintains adequate
covenant cushions.

"We could downgrade the company if operating or credit performance
deteriorates, if the company' covenant cushions erode, or if
leverage increases substantially above our base-case expectations.
We could also downgrade the company if regulatory issues materially
affect the company's ability to operate.

"We believe an upgrade is unlikely at this time. Over the longer
term, we could upgrade the company if it is able to materially
lessen its regulatory risk, or if the company is able to
meaningfully diversify its funding sources."


YC ATLANTA: Seeks to Hire GGG Partners as Financial Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------
YC Atlanta Hotel LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia to hire GGG Partners, LLC as
its financial advisor.

The firm's services include:

      (a) assisting with the preparation of cash flow forecasts and
the continuous monitoring of the cash position, cash collateral
usage, and projected liquidity of the Debtor's business;

      (b) assisting the Debtor and its bankruptcy counsel with
matters relating to the Debtor's bankruptcy, including, without
limitation, attendance at court hearings, assistance with the
preparation of the Debtor's plan of reorganization, negotiation of
plan provisions with creditors, preparation of detailed projections
in support of the plan, and provision of expert testimony;

      (c) being available to the Debtor to address other matters
relating to the operation and reorganization of its business as
requested by its counsel or management; and

      (d) other financial advisory services.

GGG Partners will be paid at these rates:

     Richard Gaudet, Partner           $390 per hour
     Jessica Peterson, Partner         $350 per hour

The firm will receive a retainer in the amount of $5,000.

Richard Gaudet, a partner at GGG Partners, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

GGG Partners can be reached at:

     Richard Gaudet
     GGG Partners, LLC
     3155 Roswell Rd NE Suite 120
     Atlanta, GA 30305
     Tel: (404) 256-0003
     Mobile: (404) 680-7032
     Email: rgaudet@gggmgt.com

                       About YC Atlanta Hotel

YC Atlanta Hotel, LLC, a hotel owner and operator in College Park,
Ga., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 21-50964) on Feb. 3, 2021.  Baldev Johal,
managing member, signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of
between $1,000,001 and $10,000,000 and liabilities of between
$10,000,001 and $50,000,000.  

David L. Bury, Jr., Esq., at Stone & Baxer, LLP is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


YC ATLANTA: Seeks to Hire Stone & Baxter as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
YC Atlanta Hotel LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia to hire Stone & Baxter, LLP as
its legal counsel.

The firm will render these services:

     a. give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers and
duties in the continued operation of its business and management of
its assets;

     b. prepare legal papers;

     c. continue existing litigation, if any, to which the Debtor
may be a party and conduct examinations incidental to the
administration of the Debtor's estate;

     d. take necessary actions for the proper preservation and
administration of the estate;

     e. assist the Debtor in the preparation and filing of its
statement of financial affairs and schedules;

     f. take necessary actions with respect to the use by the
Debtor of its property pledged as collateral, including cash
collateral, if any;

     g. prosecute all claims the Debtor has against others;

     h. perform all other legal services for the Debtor in
connection with its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's standard rates for its attorneys range between $200 and
$525 per hour.  Paralegals and research assistants charge $135 per
hour.

David Bury Jr., Esq., a partner at Stone & Baxter, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term
is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Ward Stone, Jr., Esq.
     David L. Bury, Jr., Esq.
     Matthew S. Cathey, Esq.
     Stone & Baxter, LLP
     Suite 800, Fickling & Co. Bulding
     577 Mulberry Street
     Macon, GA 31201-8256
     Telephone: (478) 750-9898
     Facsimile: (478) 750-9899
     Email: wstone@stoneandbaxter.com
            dbury@stoneandbaxter.com
            mcathey@stoneandbaxter.com

                       About YC Atlanta Hotel

YC Atlanta Hotel, LLC, a hotel owner and operator in College Park,
Ga., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 21-50964) on Feb. 3, 2021.  Baldev Johal,
managing member, signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of
between $1,000,001 and $10,000,000 and liabilities of between
$10,000,001 and $50,000,000.  

David L. Bury, Jr., Esq., at Stone & Baxer, LLP is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


YOUFIT HEALTH CLUBS: New CEO Vahaly Takes Helm
----------------------------------------------
YouFit Health Clubs, known nationwide for its affordable
memberships and state-of-the-art fitness equipment, has laid the
groundwork for a successful 2021, with new leadership and ownership
poised to take the company to the next level.

The national fitness chain has recently gone through a Chapter 11
financial restructuring and is now owned by a group of investors,
including majority shareholders Birch Grove Capital.

YouFit also announced a new CEO, Brian Vahaly.  Vahaly recently
served as the CFO of strength training-focused [solidcore], with a
background in private equity and early-stage venture capital.

"I could not be more excited and honored to lead YouFit," said new
CEO Brian Vahaly. "At its core, this club is about our loyal
members, and they are going to see a lot of positive changes at
this company. The gym landscape has changed over the last few
months, and we look forward to welcoming customers back into the
new YouFit."

In November, due to the unprecedented challenges of the ongoing
pandemic, YouFit Health Clubs made the decision to restructure the
company through a bankruptcy filing so it could continue operating
and serving its loyal clients. With its new leadership and
ownership, the company is on track for a strong future.

"This has always been a great gym at a great price. And now, we
have plans to improve our service and offerings even more. There
are some positive changes coming. We are inspired and committed to
helping our members live healthy, active lives," said Vahaly.

YouFit has 80 health clubs throughout the country. All locations
are enforcing strict health and safety protocols (including those
mandated by local and state governments) to protect members during
the pandemic.

For more information about the measures YouFit is taking to keep
members healthy, visit
https://www.YouFit.com/blog/YouFit-safety-measures.

                   About YouFit Health Clubs

YouFit Health Clubs, LLC, and its affiliates own and operate 85
fitness clubs in the states of Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia,
Louisiana, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, and
Virginia.  Visit https://www.youfit.com/ for more information.

On Nov. 9, 2020, YouFit Health Clubs and its affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-12841).
YouFit was estimated to have $50 million to $100 million in assets
and $100 million to $500 million in liabilities as of the filing.

The Hon. Mary F. Walrath is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Greenberg Traurig LLP as its bankruptcy counsel,
FocalPoint Securities LLC as investment banker, Red Banyan Group
LLC as communications consultant, and Hilco Real Estate LLC as real
estate advisor. Donlin Recano & Company Inc. is the claims agent.

On Nov. 18, 2020, the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed a
committee to represent unsecured creditors in the Debtors' Chapter
11 cases. The committee tapped Berger Singerman LLP and Pachulski
Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as its legal counsel, and Dundon Advisers
LLC as its financial advisor.


ZAYO GROUP: S&P Affirms 'B' First-Lien Debt Rating on Loan Add-On
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating on Boulder,
Colo.-based fiber infrastructure provider Zayo Group Holdings
Inc.'s first-lien debt following the company's proposed $205
million add-on to its $4.75 billion term loan B due 2027. The '3'
recovery rating is unchanged, indicating S&P's expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in the event
of a payment default.

S&P said, "We expect the company to use the $205 million of
proceeds from the add-on to redeem $202 million of legacy senior
unsecured notes that remain outstanding. Because the company is
refinancing its unsecured notes with secured debt, we are revising
the rounded recovery estimate on the first-lien debt to 50% from
55%.

"In addition, we are lowering our default valuation of Zayo to $4.2
billion from $4.6 billion, primarily due to the sale of its zColo
data center collocation business, which was completed in December
2020. Despite the lower valuation, our issue-level and recovery
ratings are the same due to $495 million in first-lien debt
repayment, which was completed in conjunction with the sale.

"Our 'B' issuer credit rating and stable rating outlook on the
company are unaffected. We expect adjusted leverage will decrease
to the low-6x area from about 6.5x pro forma the sale of the zColo
business on modest EBITDA growth, providing some cushion against
our 7x downgrade threshold."

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

-- S&P's simulated scenario contemplates a default due to
speculative capital spending for expansion combined with economic
pressure that leads to increased customer churn. S&P believes this
decline in operating results would result in a payment default at
the point the company's liquidity and cash flow would be
insufficient to cover cash interest expenses, mandatory debt
amortization, and maintenance-level capital spending requirements.

-- S&P has valued the company on a going-concern basis using a 6x
multiple of our projected emergence-level EBITDA of $700 million.
The 6x multiple (at the high end of the 5x-6x range we ascribe to
telecommunication companies) reflects that if Zayo were to default,
there would continue to be a viable business model, reflecting its
good scale and nationwide network that allow it to compete for
multi-region opportunities. The company also benefits from its
recurring revenue business model, with high margins in the mid-50%
area, multiyear contracts, and sizable contractual revenue backlog,
which provide good cash flow visibility. As a result, lenders would
achieve the greatest recovery value through reorganization rather
than liquidation.

-- Other default assumptions include the $750 million revolver
being 85% drawn and that all debt includes six months of
prepetition interest.

Simulated default and valuation assumptions:

-- Simulated year of default: 2024
-- EBITDA at emergence: $700 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 6x
-- Gross enterprise value: $4.2 billion

Simplified waterfall:

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $4.0
billion
-- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 85%/15%
-- Collateral value available to secured creditors: $3.8 billion
-- Secured debt: $7.5 billion
    --Recovery expectations: 50%-70% (rounded estimate: 50%)
-- Collateral value available to unsecured claims: $209 million
-- Senior unsecured debt and pari passu claims: $4.8 billion
    --Recovery expectations: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 0%)


ZEST ACQUISITION: S&P Affirms 'B' ICR, Outlook Negative
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating on Zest
Acquisition Corp., and the 'B' and 'CCC+' issue-level ratings on
its first-lien secured debt and second-lien secured debt,
respectively. S&P removed the ratings from CreditWatch, where it
placed them with negative implications on March 30, 2020, due to
pandemic-related uncertainties on procedure volumes and potential
tightness on liquidity.

S&P said, "Our negative outlook reflects credit metrics that are
weak for the current rating and risks to our base case for revenues
to fully rebound and leverage to decline to below 8x for 2021,
given the gradual decline of the coronavirus pandemic.

"The rating affirmation reflects our assumption that 2021 operating
performance will return to at least pre-COVID-19 levels with
revenue growth of at least 25% and adjusted EBITDA margins
sustained in the low-50% range.  It also takes into account the
company's adequate liquidity. Zest's revenues in the second quarter
of 2020 were adversely affected by the temporary closure of dental
clinics, declining by about 62% compared with same period in 2019.
This was only partially mitigated by tight reduction in expenses.
As states started to lift the lockdowns and dental procedures
resumed in May 2020, the company began to see a gradual recovery in
demand, resulting in third-quarter revenue growth of about 6% year
over year. We project Zest will achieve 2021 revenues of at least
$90 million, resulting from more normalized ordering patterns with
continued expansion in the retail and e-commerce sales channel. We
expect the company to return to EBITDA margin modestly above 50% in
2021 and onward, similar to pre-COVID-19 levels, as its revenue
base recovers. We estimate the company will incur fixed charges
(including interest payments and capital expenditure) of about $30
million in 2021.

"Our projected adjusted leverage between 7x-8x is somewhat high for
the 'B' rating, leaving limited cushion for underperformance at
this rating.  Moreover, while Zest's revenue improved in the second
half of 2020, the sustainability of the improvement in demand is
still at risk in 2021 given the residual presence of the pandemic.
Despite the continuation of vaccine rollouts, various factors such
as testing capacity and patient behaviors can fluctuate as the
pandemic evolves. Hence, we believe there is still risk for the
company to achieve our projected base case.

"Our negative outlook reflects credit metrics that are weak for the
current rating compounded by risks to our base case for revenues to
fully rebound and leverage to decline to below 8x in 2021, given
ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if we believe that company
will maintain adjusted leverage below 8x and free operating cash
flow to debt ratio that approaches 5%.

"We could lower the rating if performance weakens for a prolonged
period, leading to sustained leverage of above 8x and free
operating cash flow to debt ratio of below 3%."


ZOHAR FUNDS: Court OKs $1.1M Sale of Michigan Parcel
----------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that the sale of the assets of The Zohar Funds, a
trio of bankrupt distressed-company investment vehicles, continued
Thursday, Feb. 18, 2021, as a Delaware bankruptcy judge approved
the short-notice $1.1 million sale of an unused Michigan real
estate parcel.

Following one day's notice and a brief virtual hearing, U.S.
Bankruptcy Judge Karen Owens approved the closure of the sale of a
mothballed facility owned by Zohar portfolio company subsidiary
Saline Metal Systems, one of a handful of transactions that have
come before the court in recent months.  Zohar has been working to
sell its interests in dozens of portfolio companies since filing
for Chapter 11 protection.

                      About the Zohar Funds

New York-based Patriarch Partners, LLC, is a private equity firm
specializing in acquisition, buyouts, and turnaround investment in
distressed American companies and brands.  Patriarch Partners was
founded by Lynn Tilton in 2000.   Lynn Tilton and her affiliates
held substantial equity stakes in portfolio companies, which
include iconic American manufacturing companies with tens of
thousands of employees.

The Zohar funds were created to raise money through selling a form
of notes called collateralized loan obligations to investors that
was then used to extend loans to dozens of distressed mid-size
companies, often in connection with the acquisition of those
companies out of bankruptcy.

Patriarch bought "distressed" companies via funding from a series
of collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) marketed through
Patriarch via its $2.5 billion "Zohar" funds. Tilton placed the
funds into bankruptcy in 2018 in an attempt to keep Patriarch's
portfolio from being liquidated by Zohar creditors including bond
insurer MBIA, which insured $1 billion worth of Zohar notes.
Combined debt of the funds is estimated at $1.7 billion.

Zohar CDO 2003-1, Zohar CDO 2003-1 Corp., Zohar II 2005-1, Limited,
Zohar II 2005-1 Corp., Zohar III, Limited, and Zohar III, Corp.
(collectively, the "Zohar Funds"), sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 18-10512 to
18-10517) on March 11, 2018.  In the petition signed by Lynn
Tilton, director, the Debtors were estimated to have $1 billion to
$10 billion in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in
liabilities.  

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, is the Debtors' bankruptcy
counsel.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from February 15 to 19, 2021
-----------------------------------------------------------
  Company                    Ticker  Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                    ------  ------ ---------   --------
BPZ Resources Inc            BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2049
Basic Energy Services Inc    BASX    10.750    19.325 10/15/2023
Basic Energy Services Inc    BASX    10.750    19.325 10/15/2023
Briggs & Stratton Corp       BGG      6.875     8.625 12/15/2020
Bristow Group Inc/old        BRS      6.250     6.250 10/15/2022
Bristow Group Inc/old        BRS      4.500     0.001   6/1/2023
Buffalo Thunder
  Development Authority      BUFLO   11.000    50.000  12/9/2022
CBL & Associates LP          CBL      5.250    39.497  12/1/2023
Citigroup Global
  Markets Holdings
  Inc/United States          C        2.000    99.759  8/25/2023
Citigroup Global
  Markets Holdings
  Inc/United States          C        2.500    99.761  2/25/2028
Dean Foods Co                DF       6.500     1.925  3/15/2023
Dean Foods Co                DF       6.500     2.000  3/15/2023
Diamond Offshore Drilling    DOFSQ    7.875    17.000  8/15/2025
Diamond Offshore Drilling    DOFSQ    3.450    21.500  11/1/2023
ENSCO International Inc      VAL      7.200     8.500 11/15/2027
EnLink Midstream Partners    ENLK     6.000    58.978       N/A
Energy Conversion Devices    ENER     3.000     7.875  6/15/2013
Energy Future Competitive
  Holdings Co LLC            TXU      0.975     0.072  1/30/2037
Exela Intermediate LLC /
  Exela Finance Inc          EXLINT  10.000    32.346  7/15/2023
Exela Intermediate LLC /
  Exela Finance Inc          EXLINT  10.000    32.113  7/15/2023
Federal Home Loan
  Mortgage Corp              FHLMC    0.300    99.743  2/24/2023
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc    FLTW    14.000     3.557 12/15/2011
Frontier Communications      FTR     10.500    56.250  9/15/2022
Frontier Communications      FTR      8.750    54.500  4/15/2022
Frontier Communications      FTR      7.125    52.750  1/15/2023
Frontier Communications      FTR      6.250    52.750  9/15/2021
Frontier Communications      FTR      9.250    51.500   7/1/2021
Frontier Communications      FTR     10.500    55.573  9/15/2022
Frontier Communications      FTR     10.500    55.573  9/15/2022
GNC Holdings Inc             GNC      1.500     1.250  8/15/2020
GTT Communications Inc       GTT      7.875    26.082 12/31/2024
GTT Communications Inc       GTT      7.875    24.860 12/31/2024
Global Eagle
  Entertainment Inc          GEENQ    2.750     0.010  2/15/2035
Goodman Networks Inc         GOODNT   8.000    22.500  5/11/2022
Healthpeak Properties Inc    PEAK     3.875   110.642  8/15/2024
Hi-Crush Inc                 HCR      9.500     0.063   8/1/2026
Hi-Crush Inc                 HCR      9.500     0.680   8/1/2026
High Ridge Brands Co         HIRIDG   8.875     1.135  3/15/2025
High Ridge Brands Co         HIRIDG   8.875     1.135  3/15/2025
HighPoint Operating Corp     HPR      7.000    51.997 10/15/2022
Hornbeck Offshore Services   HOSS     5.875     0.703   4/1/2020
J Crew Brand LLC /
  J Crew Brand Corp          JCREWB  13.000    52.876  9/15/2021
LSC Communications Inc       LKSD     8.750     8.250 10/15/2023
LSC Communications Inc       LKSD     8.750    12.875 10/15/2023
Liberty Media Corp           LMCA     2.250    46.992  9/30/2046
MAI Holdings Inc             MAIHLD   9.500    15.875   6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc             MAIHLD   9.500    15.875   6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc             MAIHLD   9.500    15.875   6/1/2023
MF Global Holdings Ltd       MF       6.750    15.625   8/8/2016
MF Global Holdings Ltd       MF       9.000    15.625  6/20/2038
Mashantucket Western
  Pequot Tribe               MASHTU   7.350    15.750   7/1/2026
Men's Wearhouse LLC/The      TLRD     7.000     1.750   7/1/2022
Men's Wearhouse LLC/The      TLRD     7.000     1.304   7/1/2022
NWH Escrow Corp              HARDWD   7.500    32.500   8/1/2021
NWH Escrow Corp              HARDWD   7.500    28.350   8/1/2021
Navajo Transitional
  Energy Co LLC              NVJOTE   9.000    62.500 10/24/2024
Neiman Marcus Group LLC/The  NMG      7.125     4.345   6/1/2028
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG             NMG      8.000     4.872 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG             NMG     14.000    27.250  4/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG             NMG      8.750     4.872 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG             NMG     14.000    27.250  4/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG             NMG      8.000     4.872 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG             NMG      8.750     4.872 10/25/2024
Nine Energy Service Inc      NINE     8.750    45.199  11/1/2023
Nine Energy Service Inc      NINE     8.750    43.856  11/1/2023
Nine Energy Service Inc      NINE     8.750    43.972  11/1/2023
Northwest Hardwoods Inc      HARDWD   7.500    30.750   8/1/2021
Northwest Hardwoods Inc      HARDWD   7.500    28.139   8/1/2021
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC         OMX      5.540     0.573  1/29/2020
Optimas OE Solutions
  Holding LLC / Optimas
  OE Solutions Inc           OPTOES   8.625    90.000   6/1/2021
Optimas OE Solutions
  Holding LLC / Optimas
  OE Solutions Inc           OPTOES   8.625    90.000   6/1/2021
Pitney Bowes Inc             PBI      4.625   101.492  10/1/2021
Pride International LLC      VAL      6.875     7.250  8/15/2020
Pride International LLC      VAL      7.875    10.858  8/15/2040
Renco Metals Inc             RENCO   11.500    24.875   7/1/2003
Revlon Consumer Products     REV      6.250    34.336   8/1/2024
Rolta LLC                    RLTAIN  10.750     2.000  5/16/2018
Sears Holdings Corp          SHLD     8.000     1.310 12/15/2019
Sears Holdings Corp          SHLD     6.625     6.110 10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp          SHLD     6.625     3.521 10/15/2018
Sears Roebuck Acceptance     SHLD     7.500     0.906 10/15/2027
Sears Roebuck Acceptance     SHLD     6.750     0.841  1/15/2028
Sears Roebuck Acceptance     SHLD     6.500     0.706  12/1/2028
Sears Roebuck Acceptance     SHLD     7.000     0.662   6/1/2032
Sempra Texas Holdings Corp   TXU      5.550    13.500 11/15/2014
Spirit AeroSystems Inc       SPR      1.017    99.803  6/15/2021
Summit Midstream Partners    SMLP     9.500    45.000       N/A
TerraVia Holdings Inc        TVIA     5.000     4.644  10/1/2019
Transworld Systems Inc       TSIACQ   9.500    30.000  8/15/2021
Voyager Aviation
  Holdings LLC /
  Voyager Finance Co         VAHLLC   9.000    60.070  8/15/2021
Voyager Aviation
  Holdings LLC
  / Voyager Finance Co       VAHLLC   9.000    59.993  8/15/2021
ZF Automotive US Inc         TRW      4.500    96.012   3/1/2021
ZF Automotive US Inc         TRW      4.500    96.012   3/1/2021



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2021.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***