/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/201104.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, November 4, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 308

                            Headlines

1191 DOLSONTOWN: Union Board of Trustees May File Amended Suit
2045 E HIGHLAND: Has 100% for Creditors; Dismissal Sought
305 EAST 61ST: Trustee's Liquidating Plan Confirmed by Judge
AAG FH: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
ABUNDANT LIFE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

ADVANTAGE HOLDCO: Asks for Plan Exclusivity Extension Thru Jan. 21
AMC ENTERTAINMENT: Mulls Sale of Stocks to Raise Funds
ANDES INDUSTRIES: CEO Says Newco Should Be Identified
ANDES INDUSTRIES: Estimated $1.96M for Unsecureds in Creditors Plan
ANDES INDUSTRIES: Petitioning Creditors Defend Newco Plan

APPROACH RESOURCES: Court OKs $115M Sale to Zarvona
ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: Appointment of Separate Panel Sought
AVIANCA HOLDINGS: Can Only Reject 2 USAV Contracts
BG WILLIAMS: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Thru April 2021
BJ SERVICES: Plan Hearing Adjourned to Nov. 5

BJ SERVICES: Unsecureds to Have 0% to 13.3% Recovery in Joint Plan
BLANK LABEL: Confirmation Denied; Amended Plan Due Nov. 9
BLANK LABEL: Diamond Says Plan Generally Unrealistic
BLANK LABEL: Responds to Amex Objection to Plan
BLANK LABEL: Says Diamond Not Fully Secured

BLANK LABEL: Says FRB's PPP Loan Is Unsecured If Not Forgiven
BRIAN WARREN: Dismissal of Spencer Lawsuit Recommended
BUMBLE BEE: Court Axes Ch.11 Estate Settlement Due to Tax Claims
C AND N TRANSPORT: Plan Hearing Continued to Nov. 18
CARPENTER'S ROOFING: Plan Disclosures Hearing Deferred to Nov. 17

CATHERINE COURTS: Seeks to Hire Di Silvestro as Special Counsel
CHURCH THAT FEEDS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CIRQUE DU SOLEIL: Foreign Rep Selling All Assets to Spectacle
COLT V. LLC: Plan Confirmation Hearing Adjourned to Nov. 16
COMCAR INDUSTRIES: K&K Truck Buying Low Value Assets for $1.25K

CONSOLIDATED INFRASTRUCTURE: Comcast Dispute Resolved; Plan Okayed
CONSOLIDATED LAND: Competing Plans Slated for Hearing
CONTRACT TRANSPORT: Hires Frederic P. Schwieg as Legal Counsel
CORSAIR GAMING: Moody's Raises CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
CRGR LLC: $270K Sale of Hendersonville to Abad Approved

CROSSROADS COLLISION: Selling San Antonio Property for $863K
DELUXE EXPRESS: Plan Filing Deadline Extended to Nov. 30
DIAMOND COACH: Seeks Approval to Hire Dunham Hildebrand as Counsel
DIAMOND COACH: Seeks to Hire Tortola Advisors, Appoint CRO
EAST CAROLINA: Plan Deadline Extended to Nov. 24

EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Hire Kelley Drye as Special Counsel
EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Hire Kurtzman as Administrative Advisor
EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Hire RSM US as Valuation Advisor
EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Tap Winston & Strawn as Tax Counsel
EMERGENT CAPITAL: Taps Curtis Mallet-Prevost as Litigation Counsel

EMERGENT CAPITAL: Taps Pachulski Stang as Legal Counsel
ENGINEERED PROPULSION: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
EXPRESS GOLD: CCAA Stay Extended Until December 15
EXTRACTECH LLC: Wants Plan Exclusivity Extended Thru Dec. 9
EXTRACTION OIL: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Thru 2021

EZ TRANSPORT: Seeks Approval to Tap Leaberry & Stapleton as Counsel
FIC RESTAURANTS: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
FISKER AUTOMOTIVE: Settles $1.88M WARN Suit With Class Workers
FIZZ & BUBBLE: Drops Plan, To Accept $400K Cash From Decathlon
GASTON ENTERPRISES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

GORDON JENSEN: Sale of $8.7M Knollwood Facility to Fund Plan
GORDON JENSEN: Secured Creditor Objects to Disclosure Statement
GORDON JENSEN: U.S. Trustee Objects to Plan & Disclosures
GROUND OPTIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
GRUPO MARITIMO: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

HAWAII MOTORSPORTS: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until November 11
HELEN E.A. TUDOR: You-You Ma Buying New York Property for $645K
HERTZ GLOBAL: Offers Free Rental for Election Day
HILLMAN GROUP: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
ICHARD C. ANGINO: Proposes a Cordier Auction of Personal Property

INTERRA INNOVATION: Disclosure Statement Approved
INTERRA INNOVATION: Unsecureds to Recover At Least 40% in Plan
IONIX TECHNOLOGY: Board Accepts Resignations of Two Directors
J & R VALLEY: Seeks Plan Exclusivity Extension Thru Jan. 2021
JAMES C. MORRISON: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

JEFFERY ARAMBEL: Plan Admin Selling Needham Ranch for $4.4 Million
JOHN F. HOGAN: Howard Buying Berkeley Lake Property for $850K
JTS TRUCKING: Elite Buying Albertville Property for $325K
K&W CAFETERIAS: Says Restaurants Remain Open Despite Chapter 11
KENNEDY-WILSON HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook on BB+ ICR to Negative

LA KASA DESIGN: Seeks to Hire Van Horn Law Group as Counsel
LAMBERT'S CONSTRUCTION: Higgins Says It's Not an Unsecured Creditor
LAMBERT'S CONSTRUCTION: Plan Confirmation Hearing Reset to Nov. 17
LATAM AIRLINES: Court Approves Revised $2.45B Bankruptcy Loan
LE TOTE: Seeks to Hire Deloitte Tax to Provide Tax Services

LIBERTY HOLDING: Plan to Be Heard With Lift Stay Motion on Nov. 9
LITTLE MINDS: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
LOOT CRATE: Seeks Dec. 8 Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period
MANUFACTURING METHODS: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
METRO CONCRETE: Case Summary & 19 Unsecured Creditors

METRONOMIC HOLDINGS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
MICHAEL GALMOR: Trustee Selling Emmert Property for $448K
MOLINA HEALTHCARE: Moody's Gives Ba3 Rating on $650MM Unsec. Notes
MONAKER GROUP: Amends Share Exchange Agreement with Hotplay
NEW MOON: Seeks Approval to Hire BransonLaw PLLC as Counsel

NEW YORK GRANITE: USA Granite Buying All Assets for $27K Cash
NORTHWEST CAPITAL: NHNY Buying Springfield Apartment for $12.5M
NPC INT'L: $2.75M Workers Incentives Approved Over Objections
NPC INT'L: Committee Says Plan Disclosures Not Clear
NPC INT'L: Gets Court Approval to Send Plan to Creditors

OAKVIEW CROSSING: Seeks to Hire Kelley & Clements as Legal Counsel
PACIFIC DRILLING: Files for Chapter 11 for 2nd Time
PENNSYLVANIA REIT: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PETER CHARLES: Gets Court Approval to Hire Bold Accounting
PIZZAEXPRESS FINANCING: Seeks US Recognition of UK Restructuring

PORTOFINO TOWERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PREMIER ON 5TH: Avant Garde Buying All Assets for $502K
PRO MACH: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
PS OF DENVER: Hires Columbia Consulting as Financial Consultant
PSYCHAMERICA BEHAVIORAL: Nov. 17 Hearing on Amended Plan Set

PSYCHAMERICA BEHAVIORAL: Says Plan Changes Required Resolicitation
PSYCHAMERICA BEHAVIORAL: Unsecureds Payout Hiked to 29.1% in Plan
RESIDENTIAL MARKETING: Seeks to Tap Lieberman & Cohen as Counsel
ROBERT D. SPARKS: CH Global Buying Lubbock Property for $625K
ROSEGOLD HOTELS: Addresses West Town Objection to Disclosures

ROSEHILL RESOURCES: Joint Prepackaged Plan Confirmed by Judge
ROYAL ALICE: Bankruptcy Court Appoints Chapter 11 Trustee
RUBIO'S RESTAURANTS: Seeks to Tap Stretto as Administrative Advisor
RWDY INC: Panel Seeks Approval to Hire Stout as Financial Advisor
RYAN ENVIRONMENTAL: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee

SANAM CONYERS: Janam Madison's Amended Plan Confirmed by Judge
SEAWALK INVESTMENTS: Says Sky's Plan Unconfirmable
SELLING N ATLANTA: K Designs Offers $115K for Stockbridge Property
SEMBLANCE MEDSPA: Gets Approval to Hire Truman Mox as Appraiser
SEVEN STARS: Seeks to Tap George R. Ponczek to Provide Tax Services

SHILO INN IDAHO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SHOWBOX HOLDINGS: Files for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
SMARTOURS LLC: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
SPEEDBOAT JV: Hires Beckman Feller as Special Counsel
SPHIER EMERGENCY: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor

SPOILED SWEET: Plan of Reorganization Confirmed by Judge
SPOILED SWEET: Responds to US Trustee Objection to Plan
SPOILED SWEET: Submits Modifications to Reorganization Plan
SPOILED SWEET: U.S. Trustee Objects to Plan & Disclosure
SRAK CORPORATION: Seeks to Hire Glast Phillips as Legal Counsel

STONEWALL MOTORS: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 20% Over 5 Years
SUNEX INTERNATIONAL: Trustee Seeks to Hire Michael Seese as Counsel
SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
TBH19 LLC: DBD Says Changes Address Deficiencies
TM HEALTHCARE: Ombudsman Seeks to Hire Baker Donelson as Counsel

TM HEALTHCARE: Ombudsman Seeks to Tap Huebscher & Co. as Consultant
TNT QUADRANGLE: Seeks to Tap Wolf & Henderson as Litigation Counsel
TOOJAY'S DELI: Emerges from Chapter 11 With New Owners
TOOJAY'S DELI: Has Closed Some Florida Locations
TOWN SPORTS: Seeks Going Concern Sale; Proceeds to Fund Plan

TRI MECHANICAL: Trustee Hires Springer Larsen as Legal Counsel
TRI-STAR LOGGING: Seeks Exclusivity Extension Thru November 12
TRUE HEALTH: Wins Order Blocking HHS from Withholding Payments
TUESDAY MORNING: Two Creditors Removed as Committee Members
TUESDAY MORNING: Unsecureds Owed $117M to Recover 100% in Plan

TWIN CARE HOME: Unsecured Creditors to Have 100% Payout in Plan
UNIQUE HOME: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
VECTOR SINCE 1989: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
VIDANGEL INC: Court Confirms Trustee and Studios' Joint Ch. 11 Plan
VILLA ABRIGO: Plan Confirmation Hearing Continued to Nov. 12

VIRTUOLOTRY LLC: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Dec. 21
VIRTUOLOTRY LLC: Westwood Says Disclosures Inadequate
WAYNE P. BURICK: Nagels Buying New Wilmington Property for $500K
WC CUSTER CREEK: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
WEST PACE: Seeks Approval to Hire Hayley Redd as Realtor

WJA ASSET: WJA SIF's Unsecureds to Be Paid From Available Cash
WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Liquidating Trust Seeks Assets DOJ Seized
WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Steven Sexton Must Disgorge $270,000
YUMA ENERGY: Bankruptcy Case Converted to Chapter 7 Liquidation
ZACHAIR LTD: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until January 12

ZENERGY BRANDS: Asks Court to Extend Plan Exclusivity Thru Nov. 17
[*] Bankruptcies in New Hampshire Hit New Low in October 2020
[*] Winning Solutions for Suppliers in a Zero-Sum Game

                            *********

1191 DOLSONTOWN: Union Board of Trustees May File Amended Suit
--------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Nelson S. Roman granted Plaintiff Board of Trustees
of the Local Union No. 373 United Association of Journeymen and
Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Benefit Funds'
motion to amend the operative complaint captioned BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE LOCAL UNION NO. 373 UNITED ASSOCIATION OF. JOURNEYMEN AND
APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY BENEFIT FUNDS,
Plaintiffs, v. MID ORANGE MECHANICAL CORP., a/k/a MID-ORANGE
MECHANICAL CORPORATION, and MID-ORANGE PLUMBING AND HEATING, INC.,
Defendants, No. 17-cv-2669 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y.). The Plaintiff filed
the action against Mid-Orange Mechanical Corporation and Mid-Orange
Plumbing and Heating, Inc. alleging violations of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, ("ERISA"), as well as
claims sounding in breach of contract.

The Local Union No. 373, United Association of Journeymen and
Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry (the "Union")
entered into several agreements with employers in the plumbing and
pipefitting industry whereby the employers agreed to contribute to
the Funds on behalf of eligible employees, retirees and their
dependents, and in turn, the Funds would provide various fringe
benefits to those employees, retirees and their dependents.

Defendant Mid Orange Mechanical Corp., a/k/a Mid-Orange Mechanical
Corporation was an employer who executed such Agreements with the
Union during relevant time periods and is a party to an Agreement
or Agreements with the Union by virtue of membership in the
Mechanical Contractors Association of Rockland, Orange, Sullivan
Counties, etc. The Plaintiff alleged that Defendant Mid-Orange
Plumbing and Heating, Inc. ("MOPHI"), is also an employer that is a
party to Agreements with the Union.

Mid-Orange performed plumbing and heating work in Orange County
until on or about May 1, 2013.  MOPHI also performed, and continues
to perform, plumbing and heating work in Orange County. The two
companies, Mid-Orange and MOPHI, used the same accountants,
clerical workers, and other professionals; they also shared the
same payroll company and co-mingled assets and/or bank accounts.
From November 2012 through 2013, the two companies operated the
same business, from the same location, with the same ownership.
During this time, the two companies also transferred contracts,
customers, assets, vehicles, equipment, and other resources from
Mid-Orange to MOPHI, and when Mid-Orange ceased operations in May
2013, MOPHI continued the business. As a result of the
aforementioned transfers, Mid-Orange had no remaining assets.

Both Mid-Orange and MOPHI were owned, managed, supervised, and
controlled by William E. Hadden and his wife Marie A. Hadden, also
known as Marie A. Guzzardo and Marie Guzzardo. The Haddens each
served as officers of Mid-Orange and MOPHI, and also owned all of
Mid-Orange and MOPHI's shares.

On June 14, 2017, Defendant Mid-Orange filed an Answer to the
Complaint. Plaintiff subsequently amended the complaint to include
a claim for the amount owed to the Funds pursuant to the Withdrawal
Liability Judgment against Mid-Orange and MOPHI, as trades or
businesses under common control, and/or in the alternate against
MOPHI as alter ego and/or successor to Mid-Orange. Protracted
discovery followed, which was interrupted by a hiatus for
settlement efforts (from about September 2018 to April 2019), which
ultimately proved unsuccessful.

During the course of discovery, Plaintiff became aware of two
additional entities that are also owned and managed by the Haddens:
Mid-Orange Fire Protection Corp. and 1191 Dolsontown Road, LLC.
While certain records obtained during discovery referenced these
entities, Plaintiff was not able to confirm the common ownership
and principals identical to those of Mid-Orange and MOPHI, as
shareholders or members of the two additional entities, until the
Haddens' depositions on July 12, 2018. Shortly thereafter,
Plaintiff requested permission from the court for a pre-motion
conference for permission to file the instant motion. The briefing
schedule was stayed during settlement efforts, but resumed in June
2019.

The Plaintiff filed the motion to amend the complaint on Nov. 1,
2019. As of that date, the Defendants had not responded to the
motion; thus, per a memorandum endorsement dated Nov. 13, 2019, the
Court deemed the motion fully submitted.

On Jan. 21, 2020, the Court stayed the action in light of the
filing of a petition for Bankruptcy by 1191 Dolsontown Road, LLC --
one of the two entities that Plaintiff seeks to add as defendant in
this matter. On April 13, 2020, the Court lifted the stay on the
action. The Defendants filed their opposition to the motion on June
1, 2020.

The Plaintiffs sought to add Mid-Orange Fire and 1191 Dolsontown
Road as defendants because they are allegedly liable for the
Withdrawal Liability Judgment as part of a controlled group.
Specifically, the proposed amended claim alleged that MOPHI,
Mid-Orange Fire, and 1191 Dolsontown are "jointly and severally
liable" for the Withdrawal Liability Judgment. Thus, joinder under
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 20 and 21 is proper.

The Defendants argued that, because 1191 Dolsontown has filed for
Chapter 11 protection, joinder of 1191 Dolsontown would violate the
automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 362. But the
Honorable Judge Cecelia G. Morris issued an Order Granting Relief
from the Automatic Stay in Case No. 19-36870 on April 8, 2020. As
such, this concern is no longer relevant.

In the proposed Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that
both Mid-Orange Fire and 1191 Dolsontown: (i) are wholly owned by
the Haddens as principals, who are the principals of Mid-Orange and
MOPHI; (ii) are for-profit businesses that are closely related to
Mid-Orange and MOPHI; and (iii) are trades or businesses for income
and profit. These allegations are sufficient to plead that
Mid-Orange Fire, 1191 Dolsontown, Mid-Orange, and MOPHI qualify as
businesses under common control for ERISA purposes.

The Defendants argued that 1191 Dolsontown and Mid-Orange Fire are
not businesses. But the Affidavit of William Hadden, submitted in
connection with Defendants' Opposition, states otherwise regarding
Mid-Orange Fire. The Defendants' assertion that Mid-Orange Fire,
"while technically a business entity, does not conduct business
with continuity or regularity" is unsupported by any evidentiary
proof. As to 1191 Dolsontown, Defendants stated that it "has, on
occasion, rented out small portions of its space to other tenants
but does not do so with continuity or regularity." Again, the
Defendants did not present any factual basis to support this
assertion.

The Defendants' sur-reply also argued that Plaintiff may not base
its claims for liability against 1191 Dolsontown and Mid-Orange
Fire on theories of enterprise liability and alter ego. But the
Proposed Second Amended Complaint does not premise its claims
against 1191 Dolsontown and Mid-Orange Fire on those theories.  For
these reasons, the Court held that the proposed pleading is not
barred on the ground of futility.

The Court also found that the Plaintiffs have met the "good cause"
standard of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, and that leave
should be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order is available at
https://bit.ly/3o65MR3 from Leagle.com.

                    About 1191 Dolsontown Road

1191 Dolsontown Road, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-36870) on Nov. 20, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Michelle L. Trier, partner of Genova & Malin.


2045 E HIGHLAND: Has 100% for Creditors; Dismissal Sought
---------------------------------------------------------
2045 E. HIGHLAND, LLC, in August 2020 filed documents seeking an
order dismissing its chapter 11 bankruptcycase upon distribution of
the funds it isholding to creditors.  

In summary, on May 6, 2020 the Debtor closed the sale of its
commercial  property located32201 Camino Capistrano, San Juan
Capistrano, CA 92675 ("Commercial Property").  After the payment of
all secured claims and other costs of sale, the net proceeds from
the sale of the Real Property are $176,795 ("Net Proceeds").

The Net Proceeds are being held in the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel's State Bar of California Client Trust Account pending
further order of the Court.  In addition to the Net Proceeds,
Debtor's counsel has $20,505 additional funds remaining in Trust
from the initial retainer.  In addition, Debtor has approximately
$214,000 cash on hand (due to Debtor's daily operation of its
business, this amount fluctuates).  In sum, the Debtor has
approximately $411,300 in cash available.  The total unpaid general
unsecured prepetition debt in the Debtor's case is approximately
$122,892.  The Debtor is holding sufficient funds to pay 100% of
claims in this case. To avoid the time and expense associated with
formulating a liquidating plan, the Debtor requested that the Court
authorize the Debtor to distribute funds to its creditors and
dismiss this case.

A hearing on the motion was held Sept. 30.  According to the
docket, the motion has been provisionally granted.  The order
authorizing disbursement of funds will be lodged.  The dismissal
will be granted upon filing of a declaration showing that all
payments have been made.

                   About 2045 E. Highland

2045 E Highland, LLC, owns a tire and auto service shop in San Juan
Capistrano, California.

2045 E Highland, based in San Juan Capistrano, CA, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-11458) on April 19, 2019.
In the petition signed by Javier Salas, president, the Debtor
disclosed $1,747,600 in assets and $3,367,198 in liabilities.

The Hon. Theodor Albert oversees the case.  

Thomas B. Ure, Esq., at Ure Law Firm, serves as bankruptcy counsel
to the Debtor.  On Aug. 24, 2019, the Court approved Luke Raimondo
of Savills, Inc., as the Debtor's broker.


305 EAST 61ST: Trustee's Liquidating Plan Confirmed by Judge
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sean H. Lane has entered an order confirming the Chapter 11
Trustee's Plan of Liquidation for Debtor 305 East 61st Street
Group, LLC.

The Creditor Trust Agreement filed as supplement to the Plan is
approved and Kenneth P. Silverman, Esq. is appointed as the
Creditor Trustee pursuant to the Creditor Trust Agreement.

The Court determined that the requirements for confirmation of the
Plan set forth in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1129(a), and all other relevant
sections of the Bankruptcy Code have been satisfied.

A full-text copy of the order and plan of liquidation dated August
21, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2smasqs from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

Attorneys for Kenneth P. Silverman, Esq., The Chapter 11 Trustee:

         SILVERMANACAMPORA LLP
         100 Jericho Quadrangle, Suite 300
         Jericho, New York 11753
         Tel: (516) 479-6300
         Attn: Ronald J. Friedman
               Brian Powers
               Haley L. Trust

                About 305 East 61st Street Group

Based in New York, 305 East 61st Street Group LLC, a Single Asset
Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)), filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-11911)
on June 10, 2019.  At the time of filing, the Debtor was estimated
to have assets and debt of $10 million to $50 million.  The case is
assigned to Hon. Sean H. Lane.  The Debtor's counsel is Robert J.
Spence, Esq., at Spence Law Office, P.C., in Roslyn, New York. The
Debtor's accountant is Singer & Falk.


AAG FH: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed the rating outlook of AAG FH LP
to stable from negative, while affirming all existing ratings,
including its B2 Corporate Family Rating, B2-PD Probability of
Default Rating (PDR) and the B3 rating on its senior unsecured
notes.

"The stabilization of the outlook reflects AAG's strong recovery
after its dealerships reopened in June, and our expectation that
this will continue," said Louis Ko, VP-Senior Analyst with
Moody's.

Affirmations:

Issuer: AAG FH LP

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: AAG FH LP

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

AAG's B2 CFR rating is constrained by: (1) its expectation that
leverage (adjusted debt/EBITDA) will be maintained at around 6.5x
for the next 12 to 18 months; (2) execution risks around its car
dealership acquisition growth strategy; (3) small revenue size
relative to rated US auto retailing peers; and (4) the uncertainty
of the continued impact of COVID-19 on AAG's performance if
dealerships are forced to close again for an extended period.

The company's rating benefits from: (1) favorable positions in its
chosen markets (Ontario, Alberta, and Oregon); (2) a resilient
business model, with good contributions from parts and services and
finance and insurance segments, which reduce reliance on new
vehicle sales; (3) good vehicle brand diversity; and (4) an EBITDA
margin that is stronger than those of higher rated peers.

AAG has adequate liquidity. Sources are approximately C$200 million
compared to about C$15 million of cash usage over the next 12
months. Sources consist of C$49 million in cash as at June 30,
2020, C$150 million of availability under floorplans and wholesale
leasing authorizations as of June 30, 2020, and slightly positive
free cash flow in the twelve months to September 30, 2020. AAG's
cash usage over the next 12 months includes C$8 million of
scheduled payments under the vendor takeback notes and the
repayment of C$7.5 million outstanding under its on demand
revolving facility. AAG's revolver is subject to a number of
covenants, against which Moody's estimates AAG will have at least
10% cushion over the next four quarters. AAG has limited
flexibility to boost liquidity from asset sales.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that AAG's
operating results will recover quickly from the pandemic, allowing
the company to maintain adjusted debt/EBITDA leverage in the mid-6x
range over the next 12 to 18 months.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be upgraded if adjusted debt/EBITDA is
sustainable below 5.0x (6.5x for 2021E) and EBIT/Interest is above
2.0x (1.4x for 2021E); or if AAG's scale increases significantly
while maintaining adequate liquidity.

The ratings could be downgraded if a prolonged period of negative
free cash flow is expected, liquidity weakens, or leverage is
expected to remain above 7x (6.5x for 2021E) and EBIT/Interest
falls below 1.0x (1.4x for 2021E).

The coronavirus outbreak, the government measures put in place to
contain it, and the weak global economic outlook continue to
disrupt economies and credit markets across sectors and regions.
Its analysis has considered the effect on the performance of
consumer assets from the current weak global economic activity and
a gradual recovery for the coming months. Although an economic
recovery is underway, it is tenuous and its continuation will be
closely tied to containment of the virus. As a result, the degree
of uncertainty around its forecasts is unusually high. Moody's
regards the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its ESG
framework, given the substantial implications for public health and
safety. More specifically, social considerations for AAG include
the negative impact that the coronavirus pandemic had on AAG's
revenue and EBITDA in the second quarter as a result of the
closures of non-essential businesses in Ontario, which have
rebounded significantly once the dealerships were allowed to
reopen.

The governance considerations include 100% voting control by its
founder, and an acquisition strategy that could lead to higher
leverage.

AAG, headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, is an auto retailer
with 22 dealerships across North America. Revenue for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2020 was about C$900 million. Canada accounts
for about 70% of revenue while the remaining 30% is from the US.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.


ABUNDANT LIFE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Abundant Life Worship Center Hinesville, GA, Inc.
        5493 N. Coastal Highway 17
        Fleming, GA 31309

Business Description: Abundant Life Worship Center Hinesville, GA,

                      Inc. is a tax-exempt religious organization.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Georgia

Case No.: 20-40959

Judge: Hon. Edward J. Coleman III

Debtor's Counsel: Tacita A. Mikel Scott, Esq.
                  WONG FLEMING
                  3100 Cumberland Boulevard SE, Ste. 1460
                  Atlanta, GA 30339
                  Tel: (404) 348-2363
                  Email: tscott@wongfleming.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Caroll A. Norwood, CEO.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/NGXYIVA/Abundant_Life_Worship_Center_Hinesville__gasbke-20-40959__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


ADVANTAGE HOLDCO: Asks for Plan Exclusivity Extension Thru Jan. 21
------------------------------------------------------------------
Advantage Holdco Inc. and its affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to extend by 120 days the
Debtors' exclusive periods to file a Chapter 11 plan and solicit
acceptances, through and including January 21 and March 31, 2021,
respectively.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtors and their advisors have worked
diligently to administer this case as efficiently as possible to
minimize administrative expenses and maximize the recovery
available to all of the Debtors' stakeholders.

For three and a half months, the Debtors have, among other things:

     (i) negotiated and obtained Court approval of the Debtors'
post-petition financing credit facility;

    (ii) initiated and obtained Court approval of a sale of
substantially all of the Debtors' assets to two separate
purchasers;

   (iii) obtained the approval of de minimis asset sale and
abandonment procedures;

    (iv) obtained approval to reject executory contracts and
unexpired leases;

     (v) prepared and filed Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and
Statements of Financial Affairs;

    (vi) prepared and filed monthly operating reports;

   (vii) retained professionals;

  (viii) addressed, and resolved in a timely manner, challenges
related to the Debtors' business and chapter 11 efforts;

    (ix) resolved certain cure objections; and

     (x) responded to creditor inquiries.

Accomplishing these tasks in a short span of time has been a
labor-intensive and time-consuming process, fully occupying the
Debtors' limited employees and professionals.

"We worked diligently to inform and involve the post-petition
lender and Committee in our Chapter 11 cases, and we intend to
continue to consult and work cooperatively with them on all major
issues, including developing a plan," the Debtors tell the Court.

The Debtors believe the requested extensions of the Exclusive
Periods will afford key parties-in-interest time to negotiate a
potential plan structure and prepare a draft plan in advance of the
proposed extended exclusive periods.

If the extension request is denied, any party-in-interest would be
free to propose a plan for the Debtors and solicit acceptances and
such a ruling could foster chaos, significantly delay the case, and
impair the Debtors' ability to successfully propose a plan, without
any corresponding benefit to the Debtors' estates and creditors,
Advantage Holdco says.

Absent an extension, the Debtors' initial exclusive filing period
deadline was September 23, 2020, and the initial exclusive
solicitation period is scheduled to end November 23, 2020.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
epiq11.com at https://bit.ly/3dvx0f2 at no extra charge.

                   About Advantage Rent a Car

Advantage Rent A Car -- http://www.advantage.com/-- is a car
rental company with 50 locations in the U.S. and 130 international
affiliate locations.  The parent entity, Advantage Holdco, is owned
by Toronto-based Catalyst Capital Group.  Advantage has locations
in 27 markets, including New York, Los Angeles, Orlando, Las Vegas,
and Hawaii, according to its website.

Advantage Holdco, Inc., doing business as Advantage Rent a Car,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-11259) on
May 26, 2020. Six related entities also sought bankruptcy
protection and estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in
assets and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Honorable John T. Dorsey is the case judge. The Debtors tapped
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. as counsel; and MACKINAC PARTNERS, LLC, as
restructuring advisor.

On June 23, 2020, Judge John T. Dorsey authorized bidding
procedures of Advantage Holdco, Inc. and affiliates in connection
with the auction sale of substantially all of their assets.



AMC ENTERTAINMENT: Mulls Sale of Stocks to Raise Funds
------------------------------------------------------
Sarah Whitten of CNBC reports that AMC Entertainment is looking to
sell up to 20 million class A shares to secure nearly $50 million
in new capital.

The world's largest cinema chain, which has been slammed by the
coronavirus pandemic, is set to report quarterly earnings Monday,
November 2, 2020, afternoon..

Last October 2020, it warned investors that its dwindling cash pile
could push it to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

AMC, starved for cash, is looking to sell up to 20 million class A
shares to secure nearly $50 million in new capital, according to an
SEC filing published Monday, November 2, 2020.

Shares of the company — the world's largest cinema chain — fell
nearly 7% in early trading Monday. The company is set to report
quarterly earnings Monday, November 2, 2020, afternoon.

The filing is just the latest fundraising attempt by AMC. Like
others in the industry, the company has been slammed by the
coronavirus pandemic. First it was forced to shutter hundreds of
theaters, and then after reopening, saw customers stay home and
major Hollywood blockbusters delay their openings.

Heading into the pandemic, AMC already had $4.75 billion in debt,
which it amassed from outfitting its theaters with luxury seating
and from buying competitors like Carmike and Odeon.

The cinema chain has been focused on fundraising for months. It has
already renegotiated its debt to improve its balance sheet this
year and has been exploring a variety of ways to boost its
liquidity.

At a maximum offering price of $2.39 each, selling 20 million
shares would raise $47.7 million for AMC.

The company needs to hold on long enough for new content to arrive
in theaters. The next big feature is "The Croods: A New Age" which
is slated for Thanksgiving. Theater chains are holding out hope
that "Free Guy" and "Wonder Woman 1984" hold their December 2020
release plans. Without these new films moviegoers won't venture
away from their couches.

AMC and other theaters have been hemorrhaging money in order to
stay afloat. Last month, AMC released a preliminary earnings report
that said the company had earned around $119.5 million in revenue
during the three-month period ended Sept. 30, 2020. That's a steep
fall from the $1.32 billion gain AMC tallied during the same period
last 2019.

For the first nine months of 2020, AMC said it took in revenue of
$1.08 billion, a fraction of the $4.02 billion a year earlier.

                     About AMC Entertainment

AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., is engaged in the theatrical
exhibition business. It operates through theatrical exhibition
operations segment. It licenses first-run motion pictures from
distributors owned by film production companies and from
independent distributors.  The Company also offers a range of food
and beverage items, which include popcorn; soft drinks; candy; hot
dogs; specialty drinks, including beers, wine and mixed drinks, and
made to order hot foods, including menu choices, such as curly
fries, chicken tenders and mozzarella sticks.

AMC operates over 900 theatres with 10,000 screens globally,
including over 661 theatres with 8,200 screens in the United States
and over 244 theatres with approximately 2,200 screens in Europe.
The Company's subsidiary also includes Carmike Cinemas, Inc.

AMC has been forced to close its shutter its theaters when the
Covid-19 pandemic struck in March 2020.  It has reopened its
theaters but admissions have been substantially low.

The world's biggest theater chain said in an October filing that
liquidity will be largely depleted by the end of this year or early
next year if attendance doesn't pick up, and it's exploring actions
that include asset sales and joint ventures.


ANDES INDUSTRIES: CEO Says Newco Should Be Identified
-----------------------------------------------------
Steven Youtsey, the holder of 47.24% of the equity interests in
Andes Industries, Inc. and the CEO and Chairman of Board of Debtors
Andes Industries, Inc. and PCT International, Inc., joins in the
Debtors' objection to the First Amended Disclosure Statement in
support of the plan of reorganization proposed by EZconn
Corporation, eGTran Corporation, Devon Investment, Inc., and
Crestwood Capital Corporation (the EZconn Parties).

Steven Youtsey claims that the EZConn Parties must be required to
disclose the identities and affiliations of the proposed owners of
Newco and its sources of funding. This information is critical to
an informed understanding of the EZconn Plan.

Steven Youtsey states that the Court should require the EZconn
Parties to disclose the ownership and affiliations of Newco, as
well as its source for funding of the $3.8 million purchase price.

Steven Youtsey asserts that the Court should require EZconn to
disclose the fact that the proposed postconfirmation managers have
not actually agreed to serve in that capacity. The Court should
require the EZconn Parties to disclose that they do not have Mr.
Youtsey's consent to continue his service to the Debtors in the
event the Court confirms the EZconn Plan.

A full-text copy of Steven Youtsey's objection to Petitioning
Creditors' Disclosure Statement dated September 3, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y6jarrc3 from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

Attorneys for Steven Youtsey:

         BRADLEY D. PACK, SBA
         ENGELMAN BERGER, P.C.
         2800 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE, SUITE 1200
         PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004
         Tel: (602) 271-9090
         Fax: (602) 222-4999
         E-mail: bdp@eblawyers.com

                     About Andes Industries

Creditors EZconn Corporation, Crestwood Capital Corporation, and
Devon Investment Inc. filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions
against Andes Industries, Inc. and PCT International, Inc. under
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona.  On Dec. 4, 2019, the Chapter 7 cases were
converted to cases under Chapter 11 (Bankr. D. Ariz. Lead Case No.
19-14585). Judge Paul Sala oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Sacks Tierney P.A. as legal counsel, Beus
Gilbert McGroder PLLC as special counsel, and Keegan Linscott &
Associates, PC as financial consultant.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on Jan. 29, 2020.  The committee is represented by Allen
Barnes & Jones, PLC.

The Debtors filed their joint Chapter 11 plan and disclosure
statement on June 8, 2020.


ANDES INDUSTRIES: Estimated $1.96M for Unsecureds in Creditors Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
EZconn Corporation, eGTran Corporation, Devon Investment, Inc., and
Crestwood Capital Corporation (the "Proponents" or "Petitioning
Creditors") submitted a Second Amended Disclosure Statement for
Andes Industries, Inc., PCT International, Inc., the Debtors
herein.

EZconn, eGTran, Lan, Devon, and Crestwood filed involuntary Chapter
7 bankruptcy petitions against Debtors on November 15, 2019 (the
"Petition Date"). Rather than moving to dismiss, Debtors moved to
convert to their cases to Chapter 11 proceedings. On December 4,
2019, the Court granted the Debtors' motion to convert and an order
for relief was entered. Thereafter, on January 7, 2020, the meeting
of creditors was held and concluded.

Inaccuracies and Inadequacies of and in Debtor's Disclosure
Statement

In addition to the Debtors' dubious Projections, the Debtors also
failed to inform the Court, creditors, and parties-of-interest of
the fact that, based on conversations with EZconn Corporations'
counsel in China with the Zhong Lun Law Firm and according to an
announcement published in the National Enterprise Bankruptcy
Information Disclosure Platform on August 5, 2020, Yantai
Intermediate People's Court entered a ruling on April 10, 2020
approving a creditor's application to place PCT Yantai to enter
into liquidation proceeding to allocate PCT Yantai's assets amongst
its creditors. Based on information and belief, PCT Yantai's
creditors are asked to register their claims with the bankruptcy
administrator by October 12, 2020. The Petitioning Creditors' were
also informed of PCT Yantai's insolvency proceeding by the
Committee. The Petitioning Creditors' will continue to investigate
and will conduct discovery of the Debtors' and their principals to
determine what the Debtors' know as to the insolvency proceedings
of PCT Yantai and when they knew this information. All creditors
and parties of interest are urged to conduct their own
investigation and contact the Debtors for further information.
Creditors and parties-in-interest should not solely rely on these
statements by the Petitioning Creditors. Holders of Unsecured
Claims should discuss the implications of PCT Yantai's insolvency
proceeding on this case with the Committee and the Debtors.

Summary of the Petitioning Creditors' Plan

To be clear, the anticipated $1.96 million cash distribution to
allowed unsecured creditors is an estimate. The $1.96 million
figure represents the anticipated remainder of the $3.8 million
purchase price after the payment of Administrative Expense Claims,
and Claims in Classes 1, 3, 4, and 6. If the Allowed Critical
Vendor Claims or the Administrative Expense Claims are more than
$1.8 million, the distribution to Allowed Holders of General
Unsecured Claims could be less than $1.96 million. Conversely, if
the Allowed Critical Vendor Claims or the Administrative Expense
Claims are less than $1.8 million, the distribution to Allowed
Holders of General Unsecured Claims could greater than $1.96
million. In addition to the cash distribution, a Litigation Trust
will be established, on the Plan Effective Date, to provide an
additional source of recovery to Allowed Holders of General
Unsecured Claims.

Treatment of Class 7: General Unsecured Claims

Class 7 consists of any General Unsecured Claims against the
Debtors and any deficiency claim held by a Holder of a Secured
Claim. Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim, including
any unsecured Claims in Class and 3 and Class 6, shall receive its
Pro Rata share of the (A) remaining amount of the Purchase Price on
the Plan Effective Date after the payment of Administrative Expense
Claims and Claims in Classes 1, 3, and 4 provided however, that no
distributions shall be made to any Holder of an Allowed General
Unsecured Claim until all Disputed Claims either (i) become Allowed
Claims or (ii) are deemed Disallowed, and (B) any Litigation Trust
proceeds as provided in the Litigation Trust Agreement and the
Plan.

Post Confirmation Management and Control

The prepetition management of the Debtors will remain in place
after the Plan Effective Date to take instruction for operations
through the new owners and the board of directors. Upon information
and belief, all current employees of the Debtors have employment
contracts. As part of the stock acquisition, the Petitioning
Creditors will honor employment contracts.

Additionally, all directors will remain in place until new the new
shareholder decides to vote out the current directors. If, upon
confirmation, any of the Debtors' directors or officers decide that
they no longer desire to work under the Reorganized Debtor's
management and abandon the Reorganized Debtor, the Reorganized
Debtor will be forced to find new management.

Alternatives to the Plan

Under the Petitioning Creditors' Plan, after payment of any and all
allowed administrative and priority expenses, the Petitioning
Creditors estimate that the allowed unsecured creditors are to
receive their pro rata share of approximately a $1.96 million total
cash distribution on the Plan Effective Date or, if claims are
contested, after the effective date. To be clear, the anticipated
$1.96 million cash distribution to allowed unsecured creditors is
an estimate. The $1.96 million figure represents the anticipated
remainder of the $3.8 million purchase price after the payment of
Administrative Expense Claims, and Claims in Classes 1, 3, 4, and
6. The $1.96 million recovery is also dependent on the Petitioning
Creditors' successful challenge to the $3.55 million of
postpetition obligations asserted by the Debtors. If the Allowed
Critical Vendor Claims or the Administrative Expense Claims are
more than $1.8 million, the distribution to Allowed Holders of
General Unsecured Claims could be less than $1.96 million.
Conversely, if the Allowed Critical Vendor Claims or the
Administrative Expense Claims are less than $1.8 million, the
distribution to Allowed Holders of General Unsecured Claims could
greater than $1.96 million. Under the Petitioning Creditors' Plan,
the Allowed Holders of General will also receive Pro Rata annual
distributions from the proceeds of the Litigation Trust.

Creditors and parties-in-interest should proceed with caution as to
the veracity of Debtors' claims. As outlined in this Disclosure
Statement, the Debtors have obscured the truth. For instance, the
Andes, in disclosing its interests in entities in the Periodic
Report Regarding Value, Operations, and Profitability of Entries in
Which the Debtor's Estate Holds a Substantial or Controlling
Interest [Docket No. 183] provided financial data for PCT Vietnam
Co., Ltd., a company that Andes has 100% ownership in. A true and
correct copy of Periodic Report Regarding Value, Operations, and
Profitability of Entries in Which the Debtor's Estate Holds a
Substantial or Controlling Interest [Docket No. 183] is attached
hereto as Exhibit 13. Interestingly, Andes provided financial
records in the local currency of the Dong, not the dollar. For
reference, one Vietnamese Dong equals 0.000043 USD. Similarly, PCT,
in disclosing its interest in entities in the Periodic Report
Regarding Value, Operations, and Profitability of Entries in Which
the Debtor's Estate Holds a Substantial or Controlling Interest
[PCT Docket No. 67], as required by the Bankruptcy Code, provided
financial data for PCT Yantai., an entity that PCT has a 100%
ownership in. A true and correct copy of Periodic Report Regarding
Value, Operations, and Profitability of Entries in Which the
Debtor's Estate Holds a Substantial or Controlling Interest [PCT
Docket No. 67] is attached hereto as Exhibit 14. Here, PCT provided
for PCT Yantai's financial information in the Yuan, not the dollar.
For refence, one Yuan equals 0.15 USD. Moreover, PCT Yantai's
financial statement is inherently unreliable in any currency
because, at the time the Debtors' filed the Debtors' Disclosure
Statement, PCT Yantai was involved in a liquidation proceeding in
China. This is just another attempt for the Debtors' to
mislead and misdirect creditors and parties-in-interest.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement dated
September 7, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2yr22xe
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for Petitioning Creditors EZconn
Corporation, eGTran Corporation, Cheng-Sun Lan,
and Crestwood Capital Contribution Corporation, and
Devon Investment, Inc.:

     Christopher H. Bayley (#010764)
     Benjamin W. Reeves (#025708)
     SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
     One Arizona Center
     400 E. Van Buren, Suite 1900
     Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202
     Telephone: 602.382.6000
     E-Mail: cbayley@swlaw.com
             breeves@swlaw.com
             mkjartanson@swlaw.com

     Greer N. Shaw (#030187)
     HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
     301 N. Lake Ave., Suite 920
     Pasadena, California 91101
     Telephone: 213-330-7145
     Email: greers@hbsslaw.com

                               About Andes Industries

Creditors EZconn Corporation, Crestwood Capital Corporation, and
Devon Investment Inc. filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions
against Andes Industries, Inc. and PCT International, Inc. under
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona.  On Dec. 4, 2019, the Chapter 7 cases were
converted to cases under Chapter 11 (Bankr. D. Ariz. Lead Case No.
19-14585). Judge Paul Sala oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Sacks Tierney P.A. as legal counsel, Beus
Gilbert McGroder PLLC as special counsel, and Keegan Linscott &
Associates, PC as financial consultant.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on Jan. 29, 2020. The committee is represented by Allen
Barnes & Jones, PLC.

The Debtors filed their joint Chapter 11 plan and disclosure
statement on June 8, 2020.


ANDES INDUSTRIES: Petitioning Creditors Defend Newco Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
EZconn Corporation, eGTran Corporation, Cheng-Sun Lan, and
Crestwood Capital Contribution Corporation, and Devon Investment,
Inc. referred as Petitioning Creditors responded to Andes
Industries, Inc. and PCT International Inc.'s objection to the
First Amended Disclosure Statement in support of Creditors' Plan of
Reorganization for Andes Industries, Inc. and PCT International
Inc.

Creditors point out that:

   * The Debtors first wildly speculate that the Petitioning
Creditors are "concealing the identity of the principals and owners
of Newco" for some nefarious purpose.  Regardless, the allegation
is not true.  Newco will be formed by some or all of the
Petitioning Creditors.

   * The Debtors criticize the PCDS because the Debtors supposedly
"estimate" that there will be $4.2 million in administrative claims
due on the effective date of any plan.  This estimate is –
conveniently for the Debtors – $400,000 more than the Petitioning
Creditors' purchase amount. Nevertheless, whether or not the
Petitioning Creditors can pay all allowed administrative claims on
the effective date of their plan is a confirmation issue – not a
disclosure statement issue.

According to Creditors, although absent from their own disclosure
statement, the Debtors curiously demand that the PCDS disclose the
risk that the Debtors will fail to use the PPP funds in way that
renders them forgivable (which would oddly enough be a violation of
the Court's order approving the PPP loans). Regardless, a
disclosure statement does not need to talk about every possible
contingency. The PCDS adequately includes the concept that if there
are more creditors (such as the SBA), then the pro rata share of
each creditor will go down. The PCDS does not need to give a
lecture on this very basic economic concept.

Creditors point out that although the Debtors clearly understand
that the Petitioning Creditors' plan involves turning the
malpractice claim over to a liquidating trust, the Debtors
speculate that if the Petitioning Creditors' plan is approved, then
that will destroy the value of the malpractice claim. Here, the
PCDS adequately explains how the malpractice claim will be treated.
Creditors can draw their own conclusions as to whether they prefer
that treatment or not.

Creditors further point out that the Debtors have filed a baseless
adversary proceeding against the Petitioning Creditors to equitably
subordinate or disallow the Petitioning Creditors' federal court
judgments. As stated previously, the lawsuit provides absolutely no
benefit to the estate.

Creditors assert that at present, the Petitioning Creditors expect
to continue to operate the Debtors post-confirmation. If the
Debtors' current management does not want to abide by their
contractual obligations to Debtors post-confirmation, then they can
quit.

According to Creditors, although the Court can refuse to approve a
disclosure statement if it supports a facially unconfirmable plan,
that situation does not present itself here. The Petitioning
Creditors propose a very simple plan structure. They will pay
unsecured creditors with allowed claims more on a net present value
basis than the Debtors' plan would pay over ten (10) years. They
will do this by making a one-time, lump sum payment to such
creditors on the effective date.

Attorneys for Petitioning Creditors EZconn Corporation, eGTran
Corporation, Cheng-Sun Lan,
and Crestwood Capital Contribution Corporation, and Devon
Investment, Inc.:

     Christopher H. Bayley
     Benjamin W. Reeves
     SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
     One Arizona Center
     400 E. Van Buren, Suite 1900
     Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202
     Telephone: 602.382.6000
     E-mail: cbayley@swlaw.com
             breeves@swlaw.com

           - and -

     Greer N. Shaw
     HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
     301 N. Lake Ave., Suite 920
     Pasadena, California 91101
     Telephone: 213-330-7145
     Email: greers@hbsslaw.com

                      About Andes Industries

Creditors EZconn Corporation, Crestwood Capital Corporation, and
Devon Investment Inc. filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions
against Andes Industries, Inc. and PCT International, Inc. under
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona.  On Dec. 4, 2019, the Chapter 7 cases were
converted to cases under Chapter 11 (Bankr. D. Ariz. Lead Case No.
19-14585). Judge Paul Sala oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Sacks Tierney P.A. as legal counsel, Beus
Gilbert McGroder PLLC as special counsel, and Keegan Linscott &
Associates, PC as financial consultant.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on Jan. 29, 2020.  The committee is represented by Allen
Barnes & Jones, PLC.

The Debtors filed their joint Chapter 11 plan and disclosure
statement on June 8, 2020.


APPROACH RESOURCES: Court OKs $115M Sale to Zarvona
---------------------------------------------------
Six months after a deal to sell its assets for $192 million fell
apart due to the cratering of energy commodity prices, Texas gas
driller Approach Resources Inc. received court approval Sept. 15,
2020, for a $115 million transaction with a new buyer.

Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, Zarvona III-A, L.P., is
purchasing the assets for a consideration of $115.5 million in cash
plus the assumption of certain obligations.

At the closing of the Zarvona transaction, and upon receipt of the
sale  proceeds, the Debtors shall distribute $100 million to the
Agent for  application to the DIP Obligations and the Prepetition
Claim.

According to Law360, during a virtual hearing Sept. 11, 2020,
debtor attorney David M. Bennett of Thompson & Knight LLP said the
journey toward a sale had been a bumpy ride but he was happy to be
before the court with a transaction that had the support of its
secured lenders.

A copy of the Sale Order is available at:

    
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/6HWSZTY/Approach_Resources_Inc_and_Approach__txsbke-19-36444__0605.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

Counsel to Zarvona III-A, L.P.:

         Winstead PC
         600 Travis St., Suite 5200
         Houston, Texas 77002
         Attn: Sean B. Davis
         E-mail: sbdavis@winstead.com

                     About Approach Resources

Forth Worth, Texas-based Approach Resources Inc. --
https://www.approachresources.com/ -- is a publicly owned Delaware
corporation. The company and its subsidiaries comprise an
independent energy company focused on the exploration, development,
production and acquisition of unconventional oil and gas reserves.
Their principal operations are conducted in the Midland Basin of
the greater Permian Basin in West Texas.

Approach Resources Inc. and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-36444) on
Nov. 18, 2019, listing $100 million to $500 million in assets and
liabilities. The petitions were signed by Sergei Krylov, chief
executive officer.  The Hon. Marvin Isgur is the presiding judge.

The Debtors tapped Thompson & Knight LLP as legal counsel; Perella
Weinberg Partners LP as investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North
America, LLC as financial advisor; KPMG US LLP as tax advisor; and
Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC as claims, noticing and
solicitation agent.


ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS: Appointment of Separate Panel Sought
----------------------------------------------------------------
TMI Trust Company filed a motion seeking the appointment of a
separate unsecured creditors' committee in the Chapter 11 case of
The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans.

In a motion, Annette Jarvis, Esq., the bond trustee's attorney,
said an additional official committee will ensure "adequate
representation" of all unsecured creditors given the divergent
interests of tort claimants and commercial creditors on many
significant issues in the archdiocese's bankruptcy case.

Last month, the U.S. trustee, the Justice Department's bankruptcy
watchdog, removed TMI from the current unsecured creditors'
committee, leaving the committee comprised exclusively of six tort
claimants.

"The [U.S. trustee's] decision was unreasonable because even if the
committee could have been said to have adequately represented all
unsecured creditors as initially constituted, it certainly does not
now with only tort claimants serving on the committee," Ms. Jarvis,
Esq., said in the court filing.

"That is egregious because, in addition to the bond trustee's
unsecured claim of approximately $38 million, commercial creditors
hold millions of dollars of additional unsecured claims in this
case," the attorney said.

Ms. Jarvis proposed to change the name of the current committee to
a "tort claimants' committee" and appoint a separate panel for
commercial creditors or, in the alternative, reinstate TMI as a
member of the current committee and order the appointment of
additional commercial creditors.

TMI can be reached at:

     Annette Jarvis, Esq.
     Greenberg Traurig
     222 S. Main Street, Fifth Floor
     Salt Lake City, UT 84101
     Telephone: (801) 478-6907
     Email: jarvisa@gtlaw.com

        -- and --

     Colleen A. Murphy
     Greenberg Traurig
     One International Place, Suite, 2000
     Boston, MA 02110
     Telephone: (617) 310-6000
     Email: murphyc@gtlaw.com

        -- and --

     David S. Rubin, Esq.
     Butler Snow LLP
     445 North Boulevard, Suite 300
     Baton Rouge, LA 70802
     Telephone: (225) 325-8728
     Email: david.rubin@butlersnow.com

                About the Archdiocese of New Orleans

The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans is a
non-profit religious corporation incorporated under the laws of the
State of Louisiana. For more information, visit
https://www.nolacatholic.org/

Created as a diocese in 1793, and established as an archdiocese in
1850, the Archdiocese of New Orleans has educated hundreds of
thousands in its schools, provided religious services to its
churches and provided charitable assistance to individuals in need,
including those affected by hurricanes, floods, natural disasters,
war, civil unrest, plagues, epidemics, and illness. Currently, the
archdiocese's geographic footprint occupies over 4,200 square Miles
in southeast Louisiana and includes eight civil parishes --
Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. John
the Baptist, St. Tammany, and Washington.

The Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of New Orleans sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 20-10846) on May 1,
2020. The archdiocese was estimated to have $100 million to $500
million in assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

Judge Meredith S. Grabill oversees the case.

The archdiocese is represented by Jones Walker LLP.  Donlin, Recano
& Company, Inc. is the claims agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on May 20, 2020. The committee is represented by
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP and Locke Lord, LLP.  Berkeley
Research Group, LLC is the committee's financial advisor.


AVIANCA HOLDINGS: Can Only Reject 2 USAV Contracts
--------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn issued a memorandum opinion granting
in part and denying in part Avianca Holdings S.A. and its
affiliated debtors' motion to reject the USAVflow Limited
Agreements.

The Debtors sought entry of an order pursuant to section 365 of the
Bankruptcy Code authorizing the rejection of eight contracts
collectively referred to as the USAV Agreements nunc pro tunc to
June 23, 2020, the motion filing date. The USAV Agreements were
entered into on or about Dec. 12, 2017 to effectuate a transaction
among the Debtors, USAVflow Limited, an offshore special purpose
vehicle, certain credit card processors, and other counterparties
in connection with USAV's purchase of certain existing contract
rights -- including the proceeds generated from certain credit card
receivables -- and accrued receivables from the Debtors for $150
million plus the potential for additional amounts. The USAV Lender
Group financed the $150 million purchase price in exchange for
primary and guarantee claims against USAV and certain Debtors.

Established in 1919, Avianca is a provider of air travel and cargo
services in Latin America and around the globe. Avianca is the
second-largest airline group in Latin America and the most
important carrier in the Republic of Colombia and the Republic of
El Salvador. Avianca is a code-share partner of United Airlines and
a member of the Star Alliance -- the world's largest global airline
alliance. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the Debtors offered
passenger services on more than 5,350 weekly flights to more than
76 destinations in 27 countries. With approximately 18,900
employees and approximately $3.9 billion in annual revenues, the
Debtors play a key role in the Latin American airline market.

On March 20, 2020, the Republic of Colombia closed its airspace to
address the spread of COVID-19. Due to the restrictions imposed by
the Colombian government, on March 24, 2020, the Debtors announced
that they were suspending all scheduled passenger flights from
March 25, 2020. On May 10, 2020, each of the Debtors filed a
voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code. Each Debtor is continuing to operate its business and manage
its properties as a debtor-in-possession pursuant to sections
1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code.

In 2017, Avianca retained an investment banker to assist in
securing new debt financing -- the 2017 Transaction was the result
of these efforts. On Dec. 12, 2017, the Debtors and USAV entered
into the Contract Rights and Receivables Sale, Purchase and
Servicing Agreement, which is governed by the laws of Colombia. The
RSPA memorializes the purported sale of the Debtors' accrued credit
card receivables and the Debtors' rights to future credit card
receivables under card processing agreements (the "Contract
Rights") with (i) American Express Travel Related Services Company,
Inc. and American Express Payment Services Limited and (ii) BAC
International Bank Inc. and its subsidiaries related to the
purchase in the United States of airline tickets and related
services with American Express, Visa, and MasterCard credit cards.


In exchange for the purported "sale" of the Contract Rights and
Receivables, Avianca received $150 million plus the potential for
additional amounts equal to future credit card receivables
generated in any payment period less a reserve amount generally
equal to the amount required for USAV's monthly amortization
payments (the "Additional Purchase Price") under the USAV Loan
Agreement.

Contemporaneously with the execution of the RSPA, USAV entered into
a loan agreement (the "USAV Loan Agreement") with the USAV Lender
Group, certain Debtors as guarantors, and Citibank, N.A. as
administrative agent and collateral agent. The USAV Loan Agreement
is governed by New York law. Under the USAV Loan Agreement, the
USAV Lender Group advanced to USAV $150 million -- the same amount
USAV used to pay Avianca under the RSPA. To repay the loan, USAV
retains a portion of the collections on credit card receivables --
funneled through a New York-based bank account (the "New York
Pass-Through Account") -- sufficient to make the required
amortization payments under the USAV Loan Agreement. Any surplus
above what is required to be repaid or reserved under the USAV Loan
Agreement is remitted to the Debtors as the Additional Purchase
Price.

The central question before the Court was whether the USAV
Agreements are executory and can be rejected under section 365 of
the Bankruptcy Code. The parties agreed on the legal standard for
determining whether the USAV Agreements are executory: "if both
parties have substantial unperformed obligations, the contract is
executory even though the uncompleted obligation of one of the
parties only involves the payment of money."

The Debtors argued that the Debtors and USAV have material
unperformed obligations under the RSPA and Undertaking Agreement.
The USAV Parties argued that the RSPA and Undertaking Agreement are
not executory contracts because USAV has no material unperformed
obligations under either agreement. The Debtors conceded that the
remaining six agreements are not executory by their own terms, but
argued that, under Colombian law, the USAV Agreements should be
construed as one transaction for purposes of rejection. The USAV
Parties agreed that the Court should apply Colombian law to this
part of the analysis but argued that Colombian law does not permit
multiple agreements to be treated as one integrated contract.

Upon careful consideration, Judge Glenn held that the Debtors have
several material unperformed obligations under the RSPA, including
the obligation to sell their rights to payment under replacement
credit card processing agreements to USAV for no additional
consideration. Other material unperformed obligations of the
Debtors include to (a) ensure the Collection Coverage Ratio does
not drop below 1.75:1:00 (b) observe all obligations under the
Undertaking Agreement; (c) keep all Card Processing Agreements in
effect by adhering to all obligations under those agreements; and
(d) maintain the capacity or ability to operate domestic and/or
international flights (the "Trigger Event Obligations").

The failure to perform any of the Trigger Event Obligations results
in a Trigger Event under the RSPA, whereby USAV is entitled to
prematurely terminate the RSPA and demand, as damages, payment in
full of its loan to the Lender Group, plus surcharged interest and
administrative costs.

USAV also has material ongoing obligations under the RSPA, most
significantly to distribute funds and make payments to the Debtors
of the Additional Purchase Price.

The parties do not seriously dispute that the Debtors have material
unperformed obligations under the Undertaking Agreement. However,
the extent of USAV's unperformed obligations is contested by the
USAV Parties. The Court found that the Undertaking Agreement is
executory because both the Debtors and USAV have material
unperformed obligations thereunder.

Having concluded that the RSPA and Undertaking Agreement are
executory contracts that may be rejected, Judge Glenn held that
under Colombian Law, the USAV Agreements cannot be construed as one
agreement for purposes of rejection.

The Debtors argued that, under Colombian law, the USAV Agreements
should be evaluated together for purposes of rejection under
section 365. In support of their position, the Debtors submit the
Arrubla Declaration, which states that, under Colombian law,
agreements that are "related between themselves in regard to their
overall economic purpose, so that each of them has repercussion on
the others, and may be based on a single cause or shared economic
objective . . . must not be understood in an isolated manner, but
instead, they should be interpreted according to the
'supra-contractual' economic function of the entire operation as a
whole."

The Lender Group submitted that, under Colombian law, the USAV
Agreements cannot be evaluated together.

Having considered the Parties respective Colombian law
declarations, the Court concluded that, under Colombian law, the
USAV Agreements cannot be treated as a single contract for purposes
of rejection. The Court found that the Arrubla Declaration merely
sets forth a general cannon of contract interpretation with respect
to related agreements but does not discuss or cite to any Colombian
case law or arbitral awards holding that related agreements should
be treated as a single contract. In contrast, the Second Melo
Declaration specifically states that "the case law says that . . .
separate writings will never be considered a single contract for
purposes of Colombian law.

Therefore, the Court rejected the Debtors' argument that the USAV
Agreements should be considered a single contract for purposes of
rejection and concluded that the following agreements are not
executory contracts that the Debtors may reject pursuant to section
365 of the Bankruptcy Code: (1) Cash Management Agreement, (2)
Expense Agreement, (3) Assignment Agreement, (4) Credomatic Notice,
(5) Credomatic Consent and Agreement, and (6) AMEX Notice and
Consent. But as the Debtors' counsel acknowledged during argument,
while the Debtors may not reject these contracts, the
counterparties can assert damages claims under applicable
non-bankruptcy law for any breach.

In sum, the Court concludes that the RSPA and Undertaking Agreement
are executory contracts that the Debtors may reject pursuant to
section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code. The remaining USAV Agreements
are not executory contracts that can be rejected by the Debtors.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion is available at
https://bit.ly/34YbCuO from Leagle.com.

Dennis F. Dunne, Esq. , Evan R. Fleck, Esq. , MILBANK LLP, New
York, NY, and Los Angeles, CA, Gregory Bray, Esq. and Washington,
D.C. Counsel to Debtors and Debtors-In-Possession

Andrew M. Leblanc, Esq. , Aaron L. Reneger, Esq. , Brett H. Miller,
Esq. , Todd M. Goren, Esq. , Erica J. Richards, Esq. , Benjamin W.
Butterfield, Esq. , MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP, New York, NY, Counsel
to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

Sheron Korpus, Esq. , David S. Rosner, Esq. , David J. Mark, Esq. ,
KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP, Counsel to USAVflow Limited New York,
NY.

Glenn M. Kurtz, Esq. , Scott Greissman, Esq. , Joshua D. Weedman,
Esq. , Mark Franke, Esq. , Brandon D. Batzel, Esq. , WHITE & CASE
LLP, New York, NY, Counsel to the USAV Secured Lender Group.

                       About Avianca Holdings

Avianca -- https://aviancaholdings.com/ -- is the commercial brand
for the collection of passenger airlines and cargo airlines under
the umbrella company Avianca Holdings S.A. Avianca has been flying
uninterrupted for 100 years.  With a fleet of 158 aircraft,
Avianca
serves 76 destinations in 27 countries within the Americas and
Europe.

Avianca Holdings S.A. and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
20-11133) on May 10, 2020. At the time of the filing, Debtors
disclosed $7,273,900,000 in assets and $7,268,700,000 in
liabilities.  

Judge Martin Glenn oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Milbank LLP as general bankruptcy counsel;
Urdaneta, Velez, Pearl & Abdallah Abogados and Gomez-Pinzon
Abogados S.A.S. as restructuring counsel; Smith Gambrell and
Russell, LLP as aviation counsel; Seabury Securities LLC as
financial restructuring
advisor and investment banker; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial
restructuring advisor; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors in the Debtor's bankruptcy cases on May 22, 2020.


BG WILLIAMS: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Thru April 2021
-----------------------------------------------------------
At the behest of BG Williams Farms, LLC, Chief Judge Edward J.
Coleman, III extended the period within which the Debtor has the
exclusive right to file a chapter 11 plan to April 30, 2021.

The extended time will allow the Debtor to:

     -- validate projections for its Fall 2020 broccoli crop, its
2021 onion crop, and its Spring 2021 broccoli crop;

     -- negotiate and finalize third-party financing regarding its
onion and broccoli packing and storage facilities, including the
ongoing discussions with certain large secured creditors before
proposing a bankruptcy-exit plan; and

     -- assess its onion packing operation and in particular, the
machinery and equipment used to process and pack onions for sale
and the ongoing costs and expenses associated with the same, which
are necessary for discussions with those creditors whose claims are
secured by this equipment.

The Debtor said it has been paying its debts and meeting its
post-petition obligations as they become due, including
post-petition payroll tax obligations and the United States Trustee
reporting and quarterly fee requirements.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3nHfsBj at no extra charge.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/34XYlCw at no extra charge.

                    About BG Williams Farms

BG Williams Farms LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Case No. 19-60436) on Nov. 13,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  

Chief Judge Edward J. Coleman III oversees the case.  The Debtor
tapped James L. Drake, Jr. PC as its legal counsel and D. Paul
Graham, chief executive officer of Graham Capital Partners, LLC, as
its financial advisor.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed and
no request has been made for the appointment of a trustee or
examiner.


BJ SERVICES: Plan Hearing Adjourned to Nov. 5
---------------------------------------------
On Sept. 11, 2020, the Court entered an order conditionally
approving the disclosure statement and setting a hearing to
consider confirmation of the Plan.  The Disclosure Statement Order
scheduled a combined hearing on Oct. 9, 2020.

On Oct. 1, the Debtors filed a notice extending certain deadlines
established in the Disclosure Statement Order and rescheduling the
Combined Hearing Date to October 16, 2020.

The Debtors on Oct. 8, 2020 filed an emergency motion for an
adjournment of the hearing.  The Debtors explained that on August
21, 2020, the Court entered an order approving the sale of certain
of the Debtors' fracking equipment and intellectual property as a
going concern to TES Asset Acquisition, LLC (the "Fracking Sale
Order").  In the Fracking Sale Order, the Court specifically
reserved for later determination the allocation of the purchase
price to the holders of liens or claims on the assets subject to
the sale (the "Allocation Dispute").  A hearing on the Allocation
Dispute was initially set for Sept. 22, 2020, and was subsequently
reset on two separate occasions (to Oct. 29, 2020).  Resolution of
the Allocation Dispute may materially impact confirmation of the
Debtors' Plan, including decisions by certain creditors regarding
whether to vote to accept or reject the Plan.  Additionally, the
Debtors are currently engaged in discussions with their primary
creditor constituencies regarding the potential resolution of other
outstanding disputes that could materially impact Plan
confirmation.  To allow those discussions to continue and also to
accommodate the continued Allocation Hearing in the event the
parties are unable to consensually resolve the Allocation Dispute,
the Debtors sought a further continuance of the Combined Hearing
Date.

According to a second notice of of adjournment of the hearing, at
the hearing before the Court on Oct. 21, 2020, the Court further
extended certain dates as follows:

   * The hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan and final
approval of the Disclosure Statement will be on Nov. 5, 2020 at
8:00 a.m.

   * The deadline for voting on the Plan is Nov. 2, 2020 at 4:00
p.m.

    The deadline for filing objections to the Plan and final
approval of the Disclosure Statement is Nov. 2, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.

Co-Counsel to the Debtors:

     Jason S. Brookner
     Paul D. Moak
     Amber M. Carson
     GRAY REED & McGRAW LLP
     1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2000
     Houston, Texas 77056
     Telephone: (713) 986-7127
     Facsimile: (713) 986-5966
     Email: jbrookner@grayreed.com
            pmoak@grayreed.com
            acarson@grayreed.com

Co-Counsel to the Debtors:

     Joshua A. Sussberg, P.C.
     Christopher T. Greco, P.C.
     KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
     KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
     601 Lexington Avenue
     New York, New York 10022
     Telephone: (212) 446-4800
     Facsimile: (212) 446-4900
     Email: joshua.sussberg@kirkland.com
            cgreco@kirkland.com

            - and -

     Samantha G. Lawrence
     Joshua M. Altman
     300 North LaSalle Street
     Chicago, Illinois 60654
     Telephone: (312) 862-2000
     Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
     Email: samantha.lawrence@kirkland.com
            josh.altman@kirkland.com

                        About BJ Services

BJ Services, LLC provides hydraulic fracturing and cementing
services to upstream oil and gas companies engaged in the
exploration and production of North American oil and natural gas
resources.  Based in Tomball, Texas, BJ Services operates in every
major basin throughout U.S. and Canada.  Visit
https://www.bjservices.com for more information.

BJ Services and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 20-33627)
on July 20, 2020.  At the time of the filing, Debtors disclosed
assets of between $500 million and $1 billion and liabilities of
the same range.  Judge Marvin Isgur oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Kirkland & Ellis
International, LLP and Gray Reed & McGraw LLP as their legal
counsel, PJT Partners LP as investment banker, Ankura Consulting
Group, LLC as restructuring advisor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
tax consultant, and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. as claims
agent.

The Debtors have also tapped a number of professionals to assist in
the marketing and sale of their assets.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on July 28, 2020.  The committee is represented by Squire
Patton Boggs (US), LLP.


BJ SERVICES: Unsecureds to Have 0% to 13.3% Recovery in Joint Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
BJ Services, LLC and its Debtor Affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division, a Combined Disclosure Statement and Joint Chapter 11 Plan
dated September 11, 2020.

Class 6 General Unsecured Claims owed an estimated $130,000,000 are
projected to recover 0% to 13.3% in the Plan.  Each Holder of an
Allowed General Unsecured Claim shall receive its Pro Rata share of
beneficial interest in the Liquidation Trust and, as a Beneficiary
of the Liquidation Trust, shall receive, on a distribution date,
its Pro Rata Share of net Cash derived from the Liquidation Trust
Assets available for Distribution as provided under this Combined
Plan and Disclosure Statement and Liquidation Trust Agreement,
until all Allowed General Unsecured Claims in Class 6 are paid in
full or the Liquidation Trust Assets are exhausted, provided,
however, that all Distributions to Holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims shall be subject to the Liquidation Trustee first
paying in full all Liquidation Trust Operating Expenses and/or
reserving in the Liquidation Trust Operating Reserve for such
Liquidation Trust Operating Expenses as reasonable and appropriate.


Class 9 Interests in Parent will be canceled, released, and
extinguished as of the Effective Date, and will be of no further
force or effect, and each Holder of Class 9 Interests will not
receive any distribution on account of such Class 9 Interests.

The Debtors' Cash on hand, collection of accounts receivable, the
Sale Proceeds, the Unencumbered Sale Proceeds, liquidation of the
Debtors' assets, and the Debtors' rights under the Purchase
Agreements provide adequate liquidity to fund distributions to be
made under the Plan and shall fund the Administrative and Priority
Claims Reserve, the Other Secured Claims Reserve, among other
obligations. The Debtors had approximately $89 million in Cash for
satisfaction of Claims and their obligations under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Combined Disclosure Statement and Joint
Chapter 11 Plan dated September 7, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y3qr76kn from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

A full-text copy of the Combined Disclosure Statement dated
September 11, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4q4zaes
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Co-Counsel to the Debtors:

        Joshua A. Sussberg, P.C.
        Christopher T. Greco, P.C.
        KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
        KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
        601 Lexington Avenue
        New York, New York 10022
        Telephone: (212) 446-4800
        Facsimile: (212) 446-4900
        E-mail: joshua.sussberg@kirkland.com
                cgreco@kirkland.com

              - and -

        Joshua M. Altman
        KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
        KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
        300 North LaSalle Street
        Chicago, Illinois 60654
        Telephone: (312) 862-2000
        Facsimile: (312) 862-2200
        E-mail: josh.altman@kirkland.com  

              - and -

        Jason S. Brookner
        Paul D. Moak
        Amber M. Carson
        GRAY REED & McGRAW LLP
        1300 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2000
        Houston, Texas 77056
        Telephone: (713) 986-7127
        Facsimile: (713) 986-5966
        E-mail: jbrookner@grayreed.com
                pmoak@grayreed.com
                acarson@grayreed.com

                        About BJ Services

BJ Services, LLC -- https://www.bjservices.com/ -- provides
hydraulic fracturing and cementing services to upstream oil and gas
companies engaged in the exploration and production of North
American oil and natural gas resources.  Based in Tomball, Texas,
BJ Services operates in every major basin throughout U.S. and
Canada.

BJ Services and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Lead Case No. 20-33627)
on July 20, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed
assets of between $500 million and $1 billion and liabilities of
the same range.  Judge Marvin Isgur oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Kirkland & Ellis
International, LLP and Gray Reed & McGraw LLP as their legal
counsel, PJT Partners LP as investment banker, Ankura Consulting
Group, LLC, as restructuring advisor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
tax consultant, and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as claims
agent.

The Debtors have also tapped a number of professionals to assist in
the marketing and sale of their assets.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on July 28, 2020.  The committee is represented by Squire
Patton Boggs (US), LLP.


BLANK LABEL: Confirmation Denied; Amended Plan Due Nov. 9
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Janet E. Bostwick has denied confirmation of Blank Label
Group, Inc.'s Plan.

On August 24, 2020, Blank Label Group filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts a Combined Plan
of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

On August 28, 2020, Judge Janet E. Bostwick approved the Disclosure
Statement and set an Oct. 7 hearing on the Plan.

Following the Oct. 7 hearing, the judge ordered: "For the reasons
set forth on the record, the plan is not confirmable.  The Debtor
shall file an amended plan by Nov. 9, 2020."

The Debtor is represented by:

         David Koha, Esq.
         Casner & Edwards, LLP,
         303 Congress Street,
         Boston, MA 02210

                   About Blank Label Group Inc.

Blank Label Group, Inc. -- https://www.blanklabel.com/ -- is a
clothing retailer that has provided custom clothing in stores and
online for the past 12 years.  By developing an integrated supply
chain and digitization, it has been able to offer custom clothing
at a more affordable price point.

On May 26, 2020, Blank Label sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 20-11201).  John T. Morrier, Esq., at CASNER &
EDWARDS, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor was estimated to
have $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the
filing.


BLANK LABEL: Diamond Says Plan Generally Unrealistic
----------------------------------------------------
Stephen B. Diamond, P.C., objects to the Combined Plan of
Reorganization and Disclosure Statement by Blank Label Group, Inc.

Diamond objects to the confirmation of the Plan as not having been
proposed in good faith, as not fair and equitable, and as being
generally unrealistic, such that the Plan does not comply with 11
U.S.C. Sec. 1191 and 1129(b)(2)(A).

Diamond claims that the Plan does not meet the fair and equitable
test of Sec. 1191(b) because Debtor cannot show that it will be
able to make all payments under the plan, or even that there is a
reasonable likelihood that the debtor will be able to make all
payments under the plan, as Sec. 1191(c)(3)(A) requires.

Diamond points out that the Plan fails to meet the requirements of
Sec. 1129(b)(2)(A) because it does not provide that Diamond retain
any lien rights or receive deferred cash payments totaling at least
the allowed amount of such claim, of a value, as of the effective
date of the plan, of at least the value of such holder's interest
in the estate's interest in such property.

A full-text copy of Diamond's objection dated October 1, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y3ffyufp from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

Diamond's counsel:

          Andrew R. Schwartz
          SCHWARTZ & KANYOCK, LLC
          33 North Dearborn Street, Ste. 2330
          Chicago, IL 60602
          Tel: (312) 441-1040
          E-mail: andy@schwartz-lawyer.com

                     About Blank Label Group

Blank Label Group, Inc. -- https://www.blanklabel.com/ -- is a
clothing retailer that has provided custom clothing in stores and
online for the past 12 years.  By developing an integrated supply
chain and digitization, it has been able to offer custom clothing
at a more affordable price point.

On May 26, 2020, Blank Label sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 20-11201).   The Debtor was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the filing.
John T. Morrier, Esq., at CASNER & EDWARDS, LLP, is the Debtor's
counsel.


BLANK LABEL: Responds to Amex Objection to Plan
-----------------------------------------------
Blank Label Group, Inc., responded to the objection of American
Express National Bank ("Amex") to Combined Plan of Reorganization
and Disclosure Statement of Blank Label Group, Inc.

The Debtor points out that:

    * Based on the loan documents, West Town and the Debtor clearly
intended that the West Town loan would pay off all the Debtor's
secured debt, including any secured loan of AEBF or any other Amex
entity, and that West Town would be the first position lien
creditor with respect to all of the Debtor's assets.

    * The Amex's position relies on the October 2017 UCC-1
Financing Statement in the name of American Express Bank, FSB.
However, even if Amex can establish that said UCC-1 was assigned to
Amex, the foregoing factual scenario still mandates the conclusion
that West Town is the first priority lien creditor.  The mistaken
application of the funds of the loan closing to a credit card,
rather than the secured term loan, would allow Amex to receive a
windfall at the expense of West Town -- namely, the payment in full
of an unsecured credit card, while also retaining a security
interest that it asserts holds priority over the same West Town
loan from which Amex received $115,793 in proceeds.

   * The Uniform Commercial Code does not leave West Town without a
remedy for this inequitable result.

   * Under grounds of mistake or estoppel, Amex cannot rely on its
predecessor's UCC-1 filing to the detriment of West Town.

The Debtor's counsel:

     John T. Morrier, Esq.
     David Koha, Esq.
     Casner & Edwards, LLP
     303 Congress Street
     Boston, MA 02210
     Tel: 617-426-5900
     Fax: 617-426-8810
     Email: koha@casneredwards.com

                   About Blank Label Group Inc.

Blank Label Group, Inc. -- https://www.blanklabel.com/ -- is a
clothing retailer that has provided custom clothing in stores and
online for the past 12 years. By developing an integrated supply
chain and digitization, it has been able to offer custom clothing
at a more affordable price point.

On May 26, 2020, Blank Label sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 20-11201).  The Debtor was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the filing.
John T. Morrier, Esq., at CASNER & EDWARDS, LLP, is the Debtor's
counsel.  


BLANK LABEL: Says Diamond Not Fully Secured
-------------------------------------------
Blank Label Group, Inc., responded to the objection of Stephen B.
Diamond, P.C., to the Combined Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement of Blank Label Group, Inc.

The Debtor points out that:

  * The Debtor disputes that Diamond obtained a perfected security
interest in the FRB bank account through the issuance of a citation
that was not served on FRB, not properly served on the Debtor, and
of which other creditors of the Debtor had no notice whatsoever.

  * The amount of Diamond's claim for attorneys' fees is entirely
unreasonable, includes the duplicative and unnecessary services of
two different law firms, and is vastly disproportionate to the
amount at stake.

The Debtor further points out that:

   * The objection should be denied insofar as it asserts that
Diamond must be treated as fully secured. Further, the amount of
Diamond's claim is subject to partial disallowance or
subordination.

  * The Debtor also disputes Diamond's contention that the Plan is
not feasible.  Although the COVID-19 pandemic is certainly a
challenge to the Debtor's business, the Debtor has adjusted to the
new reality by streamlining its business, selling face masks, etc.
Diamond's objections are entirely speculative and based on
simplistic comparisons to other menswear businesses.  The failure
of comparable businesses does not necessarily support Diamond's
position, as one could also conclude that the closure of
competitors creates an opportunity for the Debtor.

                   About Blank Label Group Inc.

Blank Label Group, Inc. -- https://www.blanklabel.com/ -- is a
clothing retailer that has provided custom clothing in stores and
online for the past 12 years. By developing an integrated supply
chain and digitization, it has been able to offer custom clothing
at a more affordable price point.

On May 26, 2020, Blank Label sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 20-11201).  The Debtor was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the filing.
John T. Morrier, Esq., at CASNER & EDWARDS, LLP, is the Debtor's
counsel.


BLANK LABEL: Says FRB's PPP Loan Is Unsecured If Not Forgiven
-------------------------------------------------------------
Blank Label Group, Inc. responded to the limited objection of First
Republic Bank ("FRB").
to the Debtor's Combined Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
Statement.

On October 1, 2020, FRB filed the Limited Objection, stating that
FRB expects that its loan to the Debtor under the Paycheck
Protection Program ("PPP") will be forgiven, but that in the
meantime the Plan must include protections for FRB in the event
that the loan is not forgiven and FRB establishes its entitlement
to a secured claim.

The Debtor, like FRB, expects that the PPP loan will be forgiven.
Forgiveness of the PPP loan would render FRB's claim disallowable
and would moot any issues relating to the secured status of the
claim. The Limited Opposition relates to the parties' diverging
positions regarding the treatment of FRB's claim in the event the
loan is not forgiven. For the reasons set forth in the Debtor's
opposition to FRB's motion for relief from stay, the Debtor's
position is that FRB is unsecured to the extent that the loan is
not forgiven.

The Debtor's most recent understanding is that FRB is not yet
accepting PPP forgiveness applications. Upon the filing of the
Limited Objection, Debtor's counsel reached out to FRB's counsel to
inquire when FRB would begin accepting forgiveness applications,
but has not yet received that information as of the filing of this
Objection.

                   About Blank Label Group Inc.

Blank Label Group, Inc. -- https://www.blanklabel.com/ -- is a
clothing retailer that has provided custom clothing in stores and
online for the past 12 years. By developing an integrated supply
chain and digitization, it has been able to offer custom clothing
at a more affordable price point.

On May 26, 2020, Blank Label sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 20-11201).  The Debtor was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the filing.
John T. Morrier, Esq., at CASNER & EDWARDS, LLP, is the Debtor's
counsel.  


BRIAN WARREN: Dismissal of Spencer Lawsuit Recommended
------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Allison Claire recommended that the Defendants'
motion to dismiss the case captioned SAMUEL R. SPENCER, Plaintiff,
v. ROBERT F. SINCLAIR, et al., Defendants, No. 2:20-cv-01266 TLN AC
(E.D. Cal.) be granted. Upon review of the motions, the original
complaint and the first amended complaint, Judge Claire found that
the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and cannot hear this
case. The lack of subject matter jurisdiction is clear from the
face of the plaintiff's pleadings and could be determined sua
sponte. The case should be dismissed without leave to amend.

The Plaintiff filed his complaint in this court on June 24, 2020.
The 232-page complaint identifies the "primary objective" of the
action as the invalidation of a declaratory judgment issued by the
Nevada County Superior Court. That action involved a promissory
note between the plaintiff and defendants Brian and Patricia Warren
related to a piece of property. Plaintiff contends the Nevada
County Superior Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear
the case.

In September 2004, the Warrens purchased approximately 70 acres of
unimproved land located in Nevada County, California pursuant to a
purchase agreement in which the plaintiff financed most of the
purchase price by a promissory note secured by deed of trust
encumbering the property. The note provided that the interest rate
for the last seven years would be negotiated by the parties but
would not exceed 9%. In 2008 the Warrens filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy and, in their plan, sought to fix the interest rate on
the note at 7%. In 2012, the plaintiff set the interest rate at 9%.
The Warrens disputed this and filed a motion in bankruptcy court.
The bankruptcy court declined to set the rate and the bankruptcy
judge informed the parties they were entitled to take dispute to
California state court.

In 2012, the plaintiff started foreclosure proceedings, claiming an
inter-spousal transfer of the property triggered the note's "due on
sale" clause. On March 20, 2013, the Warrens filed suit in Nevada
County Superior Court to enjoin the foreclosure and for declaratory
relief regarding the interest rate of the note. In November 2013,
while the Nevada County action was pending, the plaintiff sold his
interest in the promissory note, the deed of trust, and the Nevada
County action to Highland Crofters, LLC. The Nevada County court
decided the foreclosure was wrongful but that the holder of the
note had the right to set the interest rate at 9%.

On Nov. 6, 2015, the plaintiff sued the Warrens and several other
defendants in Placer County Superior Court claiming abuse of
process, malicious prosecution, and intentional infliction of
emotional distress arising from the Nevada County action. The
Placer County court dismissed the case based on California's
anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425. The
Plaintiff appealed to the Third District Court of Appeals, which
upheld the decision of the Placer County court. The Plaintiff
petitioned the California Supreme Court, which denied the petition
on March 18, 2020. The Plaintiff then filed this action.

After several defendants filed motions to dismiss, the plaintiff
filed an unauthorized 472-page amended complaint. Upon review of
the filing, the court construed it as an opposition to the several
motions to dismiss with a request for leave to amend. Like the
original complaint, the purported amended complaint requests relief
in the form of a ruling that the decision in Nevada County Court
case No. CU13-07931 is void.

Multiple defendants have filed motions to dismiss based, at least
in part, on the theory that the court lacks subject matter
jurisdiction over this case pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman
doctrine. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. A
federal court generally has jurisdiction over a civil action only
when: (1) a federal question is presented in an action "arising
under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States" or
(2) there is complete diversity of citizenship between the parties
and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Absence of subject
matter jurisdiction requires a federal court to dismiss a case.
Thus, "a court may raise the question of subject matter
jurisdiction, sua sponte, at any time during the pendency of the
action."

The Plaintiff's complaint and the purported first amended complaint
ask the court to overturn the judgment of the Nevada County
Superior Court. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prohibits federal
district courts from hearing cases "brought by state-court losers
complaining of injuries caused by state-court judgments rendered
before the district court proceedings commenced and inviting
district court review and rejection of those judgments." To
determine if the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars a case, a court must
first determine if the federal action contains a forbidden de facto
appeal of a state court judicial decision. If it does not, "the
Rooker-Feldman inquiry ends."

If a court determines that the action is a "forbidden de facto
appeal," however, the court cannot hear the de facto appeal portion
of the case and, [a]s part of that refusal, it must also refuse to
decide any issue raised in the suit that is 'inextricably
intertwined' with an issue resolved by the state court in its
judicial decision." A complaint is a "de facto appeal" of a state
court decision where the plaintiff "complains of a legal wrong
allegedly committed by the state court, and seeks relief from the
judgment of that court."

Plaintiff sought to have the decision of the Nevada County court
invalidated, and all of the facts and requests for relief presented
in this case are intertwined with that primary goal. In seeking a
remedy by which this court invalidates a state court decision and
amends the state court record, the plaintiff is clearly asking this
court to "review the final determinations of a state court in
judicial proceedings," which lies at the core of Rooker-Feldman's
prohibition. Accordingly, the plaintiff's action, on its face,
clearly constitutes a "forbidden de facto appeal" and the court
lacks subject matter jurisdiction to consider it.

According to Judge Claire, Plaintiffs appearing in pro se are to be
given leave to amend unless it is clear that amendment would be
futile. Because the plaintiffs' complaint is clearly barred by the
Rooker-Feldman doctrine, amendment would be futile.

Brian and Patricia Warren filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 08-31697) on August 21, 2008,
with total assets of $1,128,620 and total liabilities of
$2,606,705.


BUMBLE BEE: Court Axes Ch.11 Estate Settlement Due to Tax Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that a global settlement proposed by the Chapter 11
estate of former tuna producer Bumble Bee Tuna failed to gain court
approval Thursday, September 10, 2020 when a Delaware judge said
she was concerned the deal didn't properly address tax claims that
could reach tens of millions of dollars.

During a virtual hearing, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Laurie Selber
Silverstein said the deal proposed by the debtor, with the support
of its lenders and unsecured creditors, would transfer jurisdiction
over the claims reconciliation process outside of the bankruptcy
court in favor of a litigation trustee before the extent of the
claims from the Internal Revenue Service.

To recall, at the sale hearing held on Jan. 23, 2020, the Debtors
announced to the Court that the Settling Parties had reached a
global resolution of various objections that the Committee
intended to raise with respect to the sale of the Debtors' assets
to FCF, as well as a potential challenge by the Committee to the
liens and claims of the Term Lenders and ABL Lenders.  This global
resolution had the dual effect of avoiding costly and potentially
value-destructive litigation, while facilitating the Court's
approval ofan approximately $925 million sale of the Debtors'
businesses to FCF -- a transaction that preserved the Debtors'
businesses as a going concern, ensured the continued employment of
the Debtors' employees, maintained trading partners for
substantially all of the Debtors' ordinary course unsecured
creditors, provided for the assumption of many of the Debtors'
contract obligations, including the payment of $17 million due
under the DOJ plea agreement, and provided full payment of the ABL
Lenders' claims and a substantial recovery for the Term Lenders.
On Jan. 31, 2020, the Debtors successfully consummated the sale,
and, with the global settlement, the stage has been set for the
orderly wind-down of the Debtors' businesses and these Chapter 11
Cases.

A copy of the Global Settlement Motion is available at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/UTPVZZQ/Old_BBP_Inc__debke-19-12502__0621.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

                      About Bumble Bee Foods

Bumble Bee -- https://www.bumblebee.com/ -- is a health and
wellness focused company with a full line of seafood and specialty
protein products marketed under certain brands including Bumble
Bee(R), Brunswick, Snow's(R), Wild Selections(R) and Beach
Cliff(R).

Canadian affiliate, Connors Bros. Clover Leaf Seafoods Company --
http://www.cloverleaf.ca-- is a supplier of shelf-stable seafood,
producing and marketing its products under several brands,
including Clover Leaf(R), Brunswick(R) and Wild Selections(R).
CBCLS's international business distributes products under the
Brunswick(R) Bumble Bee(R) and Beach Cliff(R) brands to over 40
markets and countries, including Barbados, Jamaica, and Trinidad &
Tobago.

San Diego, California-based Bumble Bee Parent, Inc., and four
affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 19-12502) on Nov. 21, 2019, before the Hon. Laurie Selber
Silverstein. In the petitions signed by Kent McNeil, vice
president, Bumble Bee Parent was estimated to have $50 million to
$100 million in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in
liabilities.

Attorneys at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP, led by
Alan W. Kornberg, Esq., Kelley A. Cornish, Esq., Claudia R. Tobler,
Esq., and Aaron J. David, Esq., serve as counsel to the Debtors.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, led by Pauline K. Morgan,
Esq., Ryan M. Bartley, Esq., and Ashley E. Jacobs, Esq., serves as
co-counsel.

The Debtors tapped AlixPartners, LLP as restructuring advisor;
Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as investment banker; and Prime Clerk as
notice, claims, solicitation and balloting agent.


C AND N TRANSPORT: Plan Hearing Continued to Nov. 18
----------------------------------------------------
C and N Transport LLC proposed a Plan and a Disclosure Statement on
Sept. 4, 2020.

On Sept. 9, Judge Caryl E. Delano conditionally approved the
Disclosure Statement and set an Oct. 21 hearing to consider
confirmation of the Plan and final approval of the Disclosure
Statement.

A hearing was held Oct. 21.  According to the proceeding memo, all
matters related to the PLan have been continued for hearing to Nov.
18, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.

The Debtor will retain all property of the estate and continue
operating its business as a reorganized debtor.  The Debtor will
fund the Plan from its post-confirmation revenue.

Under the Plan, general unsecured creditors in Class 12 will
receive a pro rata distribution of the Debtor's net income over 60
months.  The class is projected to recover in excess of 50 percent
of their allowed claims.

According to the Debtor, Classes 4, 6, 9, and 12 voted to accept
the Plan while Class 11 (secured claim of Wells Fargo) voted to
reject the Plan

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/5MYSEBY/C_and_N_Transport_LLC__flmbke-20-00427__0106.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

                     About C and N Transport

Based in Cape Coral, Fla., C and N Transport LLC is a trucking
company which provides general freight transportation services
throughout the United States of America.

C and N Transport sought bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 20-00427) on Jan.
21, 2020.  In the petition signed by Cynthia Trayner, member, the
Debtor estimated up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  Michael R. Dal Lago, Esq., at Dal Lago
Law, serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.

The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
C and N Transport, LLC, according to court dockets.


CARPENTER'S ROOFING: Plan Disclosures Hearing Deferred to Nov. 17
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A Disclosure Statement and Plan were filed pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Sec. 1121 and 1125 on May  19, 2020 by Carpenter's Roofing & Sheet
Metal, Inc.

Judge Mindy A. Mora previously entered an order setting an Oct. 20
hearing on the Disclosure Statement, and setting certain deadlines,
including a deadline of Oct. 6, 2020 for the Debtor to file a
redlined and clean version of the proposed Amended Disclosure
Statement.

On Sept. 29, 2020, the Debtor filed an expedited motion to continue
the hearing on approval of the Disclosure Statement and
confirmation of Chapter 11 Plan.  The Debtor explained that it and
creditor Department of the Treasury -Internal Revenue Service are
in continued negotiations regarding various contested matters.
Resolution of the contested matters with the IRS are an essential
component to finalization of the the Plan of Reorganization.  The
Debtor maintains that it is in the best interest of all parties to
continue the hearing on approval of Disclosure Statement for a
period of four weeks to allow the parties  additional  time to
continue toward completion of the negotiations relative to the
above matters.

On Oct. 2, 2020, Judge Mora ordered that:

   * An Amended Disclosure Statement will be filed in both redlined
and clean form on or before Nov. 3, 2020.

   * The deadline to file objections to the Amended Disclosure
statement is Nov. 10, 2020.

   * A hearing on the Disclosure Statement will be held Nov. 17,
2020 at 1:30 p.m.

The last day for filing and serving objections to the disclosure
statement is on Tuesday, October 13, 2020 (seven days before
Disclosure Hearing).

     Attorney for Debtor:

     Craig I. Kelley, Esquire
     KELLEY, FULTON & KAPLAN, P.L.
     1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd
     The Forum - Suite 1000
     West Palm Beach, FL 33401
     Tel. No. (561) 491-1200
     Fax No. (561) 684-3773
     e-mail: bankruptcy@kelleylawoffice.com

                    About Carpenter's Roofing

Carpenter's Roofing & Sheet Metal, Inc. --
https://carpentersroofing.com/ -- is a roofing contractor
headquartered in West Palm Beach, Fla. It was founded in 1931 by
Howard Carpenter.

Carpenter's Roofing & Sheet Metal sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-24798) on
Nov. 29, 2018. At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed
$1,040,593 in assets and $1,838,038 in liabilities.  

The case is assigned to Judge Mindy A. Mora.  

The Debtor hired Kelley & Fulton, PL, as its legal counsel, and
Rinehimerbaker LLC as its accountant.


CATHERINE COURTS: Seeks to Hire Di Silvestro as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Catherine Courts Condominium, LLC and Catherine Courts Management,
Inc. seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois to employ Di Silvestro & Associates as special
counsel.

The Debtors need legal assistance on matters related to the
contemplated sale of substantially all of their assets.

Subject to the court's approval, Di Silvestro will charge for its
legal services on an hourly basis and will seek reimbursements for
work-related expenses incurred.

Robert Di Silvestro, Esq., at Di Silvestro, disclosed in court
filings that the firm neither holds nor represents any interest
adverse to the Debtors' estates.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Robert J. Di Silvestro, Esq.
     Di Silvestro & Associates
     5231 North Harlem Avenue
     Chicago, IL 60656
     Telephone: (773) 774-2000
     Email: info@disilvestrolaw.com

                About Catherine Courts Condominium

Catherine Courts Condominium, LLC and Catherine Courts Management,
Inc. are privately held companies whose principal assets are
located at 8503 W. Catherine Ave., Chicago.  

The Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case Nos. 19-29822 and 19-29823) on Oct. 20,
2019.  Guido C. Neri, member and authorized representative, signed
the petitions.  At the time of the filing, Catherine Courts
Condominium disclosed assets and liabilities of less than $50
million while Catherine Courts Management disclosed assets and
liabilities of less than $50,000.

Judge Timothy A. Barnes oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Goldstein & McClintock LLLP as their legal
counsel and Di Silvestro & Associates as their special counsel.


CHURCH THAT FEEDS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
The Church That Feeds and Shelters All People Inc., according to
court dockets.
    
                  About The Church that Feeds
                  and Shelters All People, Inc.

The Church That Feeds and Shelters All People, Inc., filed a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-20267)
on Sept. 23, 2020, disclosing under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Debtor is represented by Van Horn Law Group, P.A.


CIRQUE DU SOLEIL: Foreign Rep Selling All Assets to Spectacle
-------------------------------------------------------------
Cirque du Soleil Canada, Inc., the Foreign Representative of CDS
U.S. Holdings, Inc. and affiliates, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to (a) recognize and give effect in
the United States to the Approval and Vesting Order to be entered
by the Canadian Court in the Canadian Proceedings; (b) approve the
sale of the Debtors' right, title, and interest in and to
substantially all assets to Spectacle BidCo Holdings, Inc., as
assignee of Spectacle Bidco LP, pursuant to the Spectacle Sale
Agreement, free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and
other interests, subject to overbid; and (c) recognize and give
effect in the United States to the Administrative Reserves Order to
be entered by the Canadian Court in the Canadian Proceedings.

The Foreign Representative is the authorized Foreign Representative
of the Debtors, which are the subject of jointly-administered
proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA")
in the Superior Court of Quebec, Commercial Division.

On June 29, 2020, the Debtors commenced the Canadian Proceedings
with the Canadian Court with the goal of pursuing a sale and
investment solicitation process under the supervision of the
Canadian Court ("SISP") and restructuring operations under the
protections offered by the CCAA.  

On June 30, 2020, the Canadian Court entered an interim order
("First Day CCAA Order").  Although each Debtor's respective
management and council of representatives remains in place, each
Debtor's assets and affairs are subject to the supervision of the
Canadian Court during the pendency of the Canadian Proceedings.  On
July 2, 2020, the Court granted certain first day relief and gave
full force and effect on a provisional basis to the First Day CCAA
Order.

On July 10, 2020, the Canadian Court entered the Amended and
Restated Initial Order ("Initial CCAA Order") extending the relief
granted in the First Day CCAA Order, among other relief.  On July
17, 2020, the Court entered the Order Granting Provisional
Recognition of the Initial CCAA Order Pursuant to Section 1519 of
the Bankruptcy Code, giving full force and effect on a provisional
basis to the Initial CCAA Order, among other relief.

On Aug. 11, 2020, the Court entered the Recognition Order, granting
the Debtors' verified petition and recognizing the Canadian
Proceedings as foreign main proceedings pursuant to section 1517 of
the Bankruptcy Code, among other relief.

The Debtors have undertaken affirmative steps to restructure their
operations.  Such efforts have been focused on a going-concern sale
of the Assets pursuant to the CCAA and section 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code, or a similarly-structured transaction.  Due to
liquidity constraints and various other considerations, the Debtors
determined they needed to commence voluntary insolvency
proceedings.  On June 28, 2020, upon the informed recommendation of
the Transaction Committee, the Debtors entered into an agreement on
the terms of the Shareholder Stalking Horse Bid, which preserved
optionality to obtain higher or otherwise better bids at limited
additional expense given the lack of any break-up fees or further
expense reimbursement requirements.  The following day, on June 29,
2020, the Debtors initiated the Canadian Proceedings.

After initiating the Canadian Proceedings ("Phase II"), all five
parties that submitted letters of intent in Phase I of the Sale
Process were provided management presentations and the opportunity
to make additional diligence requests, which the Debtors fulfilled
as received.  Two additional parties entered the Sale Process in
Phase II.  The Ad Hoc Group submitted a mark-up of the Shareholder
Stalking Horse Bid which was subsequently fully negotiated,
including the Ad Hoc Group Stalking Horse Bid, and on July 15,
2020, the Debtors filed to replace the Shareholder Stalking Horse
Bid with the Ad Hoc Group Stalking Horse Bid.  At a hearing held on
July 17, 2020, the Canadian Court entered the Order Approving a
Sale and Investment Solicitation Process ("SISP Order") and
approved entry into the Ad Hoc Group Stalking Horse Bid --
replacing the Shareholder Stalking Horse Bid.  

The SISP Order describes, among other things, (a) the Assets
available for sale and the opportunity for an investment in
connection with the purchase of such Assets, (b) the manner in
which prospective bidders may gain access to or continue to have
access to due
diligence materials concerning the Assets and the sale or
investment thereof, and (c) the manner in which bidders and bids
become Qualified Bidders, Qualified Bids, and Auction Bidders, as
applicable, (d) the evaluation of bids received, (e) the guidelines
for the ultimate selection of the Successful Bid(s) and/or Back-Up
Bid(s), and (f) the process for obtaining such approvals (including
the approval of the Canadian Court) as may be necessary or
appropriate in respect of a Successful Bid.

As set out in the SISP Order, the deadline for parties to submit
binding bids and deposits was Aug. 18, 2020.  No other bids were
received by such deadline.  The remaining parties to the Sale
Process withdrew and did not offer a Superior Bid on various
grounds, including valuation, cash needs of the business, and
uncertainty surrounding relaunch of operations.  Despite attempts
by the Financial Advisors to connect Phase II interested parties as
potential co-investors, the bidders ultimately could not provide a
topping bid following the replacement of the Shareholder Stalking
Horse Bid with the Ad Hoc Group Stalking Horse Bid.  

Over the course of the past several months, the Debtors and their
advisors pursued, in parallel with the conduct of the SISP, as well
as following its conclusion, discussions with the Ad Hoc Group in
order to determine the optimal transaction structure to be
implemented with the Ad Hoc Group, should no Superior Bid be
submitted by the Bid Deadline.  As part of these discussions, the
Ad Hoc Group expressed a desire to maintain a portion of the
corporate structure of the Debtors so as to facilitate the
transition upon implementation of the transaction contemplated in
the Ad Hoc Group Stalking Horse Bid, as well as to preserve certain
tax attributes of the Debtors.

On Oct. 9, 2020, the parties entered into an amendment agreement
with respect to the Ad Hoc Group Stalking Horse Bid so as to
reflect the agreed transaction structure ("Spectacle Sale
Agreement"), pursuant to which Spectacle Holdings, as assignee of
Spectacle Bidco LP, the acquisition vehicle for the Ad Hoc Group,
would, directly or indirectly through one or more designated
buyers, acquire substantially all of the operations of the Debtors
through: (a) an acquisition of all or substantially all of the
assets of the Non-Acquired Debtors specified in the Spectacle Sale
Agreement; and (b) an acquisition of all issued and outstanding
shares of CDS Canadian Holdings, Inc. (and indirectly of most of
the other Acquired Debtors and the other non-debtor transferred
subsidiaries) as well as the equity interests in Cirque du Soleil
Vegas L.L.C.

Consistent with the Spectacle Sale Agreement, the Debtors are also
adding 9424-9356 Quebec Inc. ("ExcludedCo1") and 9424-9398 Quebec,
Inc. ("ExcludedCo2") as applicants to the CCAA Proceedings for the
purpose of implementing the transactions contemplated in the
Spectacle Sale Agreement.

The Spectacle Transaction provides for, amongst other things, the
following:

     (a) the completion of a pre-closing reorganization of certain
Debtors in accordance with the Reorganization Step Plan attached to
the Spectacle Sale Agreement;

     (b) all of the right, title and interest in and to the
Purchased Assets will vest absolutely and exclusively in the Buyer,
free and clear of any and all claims and encumbrances (excluding
the Permitted Encumbrances);

     (c) certain contracts set out in the schedules to the
Spectacle Sale Agreement and the draft approval and vesting order
will be either retained by the applicable Acquired Debtors or
assigned to the Buyer, as the case may be, with the possibility for
the Buyer to designate additional contracts to be retained or
assigned in accordance with the modus operandi proposed in the
draft Approval and Vesting order or otherwise in accordance with
the Spectacle Sale Agreement;

     (d) certain assets set out in the Spectacle Sale Agreement of
the Acquired Debtors will be transferred to and vested in
ExcludedCo1, while certain contracts prescribed in the Spectacle
Sale Agreement and attachments thereto of the Acquired Debtors will
be assigned to and assumed by ExcludedCo1, each in accordance with
the sequence set out in the Spectacle Sale Agreement and the step
plan attached thereto; and

     (e) all liabilities, other than the Assumed Liabilities, will
be transferred to and assumed by ExcludedCo2 in accordance with the
sequence set out in the Spectacle Sale Agreement and the
Reorganization Step Plan such that on the Effective Date the
Transferred Liabilities will be novated and become the exclusive
obligations of ExcludedCo2 (and not the obligations of the Acquired
Debtors) and the Acquired Debtors and the Purchased Assets will be
forever released and discharged from such Transferred Liabilities.

Additionally, pursuant to the proposed Approval and Vesting Order,
the commencement or prosecution of any demands, claims, or actions
with respect to Transferred Liabilities against, among others, the
Acquired Debtors and the Buyer will be permanently enjoined.

The purchase price payable by the Buyer for the Purchased Assets
pursuant to the Spectacle Sale Agreement will consist of the
following considerations:

      (a) Spectacle Holdings will cause the release of all amounts
outstanding and obligations owing under the First Lien Credit
Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement as of the Closing
Date, including the principal amount of indebtedness and interest
accrued as of the Closing Date, which amount as of (but not
including) July 14, 2020, is estimated to be $1,089,497,253, plus
any fees, with such release of the First Lien Debt and Second Lien
Debt occurring in the manner, order, and sequence prescribed in the
Reorganization Step Plan;

      (b) Spectacle Holdings will arrange for the payment of a cash
amount sufficient to pay: (i) all amounts owing under that certain
"replacement loan" provided prepetition by the Ad Hoc Group to the
Debtors, (ii) the amount of the "Administrative Monitor Reserve"
and the amount of the "Administrative Seller Reserve," and (iii)
all amounts necessary to cure any monetary defaults as a condition
to assuming the Assigned Agreements; and

      (c) Spectacle Holdings will assume or cause the relevant
designated buyer to assume the Assumed Liabilities (other than
those of any Transferred Subsidiary) which are retained by such
Transferred Subsidiary.

Spectacle Holdings will also fund, or cause to be funded, the
amounts for:

      (a) an Employee Fund in the amount of $15 million to provide
financial assistance to former employees whose employment was
terminated either by the Debtors (excluding for just cause) or by
mutual agreement effective on or after Jan. 1, 2020 (irrespective
of the date on which the notice was given) and ending on the
Effective Date, who remained employees in good standing until their
services were no longer required, is not an eligible Contractor on
the Contractor Fund, and whose entitlement to receive a severance
payment from the applicable Debtors entity has not been paid as a
result of the CCAA Proceedings; and

      (b) a Contractor Fund to provide financial assistance to
certain contractors who have not provided notice of termination of
their contract to the applicable Debtor entity and who has not
received notice of termination of the contract from the applicable
Debtors entity as a result of a material breach of the contract, is
not an eligible employee under the Employee Fund, and has had their
payments for services provided to the applicable Debtor entity
pursuant to the contract stayed as a result of the CCAA
Proceedings.

The closing of the Spectacle Sale Agreement is also subject to a
number of customary conditions precedent, including the following:
(a) the Approval and Vesting Order and the Order will have been
granted and become final orders; and (b) the pre-closing
reorganization steps will have been effected in the manner, order
and sequence prescribed in the Reorganization Step Plan.

In connection with the closing of the Spectacle Transaction, the
members in the Ad Hoc Group and certain other First Lien Lenders
will provide $375 million of new financing to Spectacle Holdings
(as guaranteed by its subsidiaries, including, inter alia, the
Transferred
Subsidiaries) to finance the restart of operations and otherwise
fund the operation of the business, including with respect to the
Assumed Liabilities under the Spectacle Transaction.

Spectacle Holdings and its subsidiaries will also be liable for
debt recovery in the form of a new $300 million take-back second
lien loan and assume the obligations thereunder.  The take-back
second lien loan will be allocated among the First Lien Lenders
based on their respective interests in the pre-filing First Lien
Term Loan (including the Revolving Credit Facility).

As things currently stand, and assuming the Approval and Vesting
Order is entered by the Canadian Court on October 20, the parties
aim at closing the Spectacle Transaction on Oct. 30, 2020.   It is
imperative that the Spectacle Transaction be completed and exit
financing obtained in the near future in order for the business to
transition as quickly and smoothly as possible.  Additionally, the
parties have structured the Spectacle Transaction, in part, as a
share transaction in order to preserve tax attributes for the
go-forward business.  Preserving these assets is in the best
interest of the Debtors' stakeholders as a whole, as it will assist
in the
recovery of the going concern business that emerges from the CCAA
Proceedings.

Now that the competitive bidding process set forth in the SISP
Order has been completed and a Buyer has been selected, the Debtors
have sought approval of the Spectacle Transaction through the entry
of the Approval and Vesting Order in the Canadian Proceedings.  A
hearing to consider the Approval and Vesting Order in the Canadian
Proceedings is currently scheduled to be held on Oct. 20, 2020.  
Subject to entry of the Approval and Vesting Order by the Canadian
Court, the Foreign Representative asks recognition of the Approval
and Vesting Order in these chapter 15 cases.

As part of the Spectacle Transaction, the parties have agreed to
establish two separate administrative reserves, the Administrative
Monitor Reserve and the Administrative Seller Reserve by entry of
the Administrative Reserves Order by the Canadian Court to be held
by the Monitor in trust for, respectively: (a) the fees and costs
of the Monitor and its professional advisors; and (b) the fees and
costs of the professional advisors to the Debtors (or the Foreign
Representative, as the case may be) and the costs required to wind
down the remaining Debtors.  The Administrative Reserves will be
funded from the cash and cash equivalents of the Debtors (which
would otherwise constitute Purchased Assets), with the balance, if
any, being funded by the Buyer.

The Debtors have sought approval of the Administrative Reserves
through the entry of the Administrative Reserves Order in the
Canadian Proceedings.  The Administrative Reserves Order is
currently scheduled to be heard concurrently with the Approval and
Vesting Order.  Subject to entry of the Administrative Reserves
Order by the Canadian Court, the Foreign Representative hereby
seeks recognition of the Administrative Reserves Order in these
chapter 15 cases.

Time is of the essence with respect to entry of a final Order.
Accordingly, the Foreign Representative asks that the Court waives
the 14-day stay period under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).


A copy of the Agreement and the Orders is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y4vd6js3 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                  About Cirque du Soleil Canada

Cirque du Soleil Canada Inc. is an international live entertainment
media company, having reinvented circus arts and created one of the
industry's most iconic creative brands.  They are best known for
their live entertainment shows, which they perform in
custom-built,
partner-hosted resident venues and through touring in different
cities around the world, or licenses to third parties for
performance.



COLT V. LLC: Plan Confirmation Hearing Adjourned to Nov. 16
-----------------------------------------------------------
Colt V., LLC, on Sept. 8, 2020 filed a Combined Plan and Disclosure
Statement.

Under the Plan, secured creditor Newtek will be paid the sum of
$2.2 million plus interest at the rate of 5 percent per annum.  All
sums due to the creditor will be payable on Dec. 1, 2021, however,
the Debtor will make payments of $6,417 each month until the
termination of the plan.  There are no unsecured creditors.

A copy of the Plan and Disclosure Statement is available at:


https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/B24UQ6Y/Colt_V_LLC__miebke-20-40179__0074.0.pdf

On Sept. 9, Judge Mark A. Randon has entered an order granting
preliminary approval of the Disclosure Statement and scheduling a
hearing on Nov. 2 to consider confirmation of the Plan.

According to the minute entry of the Nov. 2 hearing, the Plan
confirmation hearing has been adjourned to Nov. 16, 2020 at 11:00
a.m. at Courtroom 1825.  Judge Randon is conducting all conferences
and non-evidentiary hearings by telephone.

                      About Colt V. LLC

Colt V., LLC, owns in fee simple a property located at 6900
Whitmore Lake Rd., Whitmore Lake, Mich., valued by the company at
$1.7 million. Colt sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 20-40179) on Jan. 7,
2020. At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $1,900,000 in
assets and $2,817,129 in liabilities. Judge Mark A. Randon
oversees the case.  David I. Goldstein, Esq., is the Debtor's
bankruptcy attorney.


COMCAR INDUSTRIES: K&K Truck Buying Low Value Assets for $1.25K
---------------------------------------------------------------
Comcar Industries, Inc. and its affiliated debtors filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a notice of
their proposed sale of low value assets, as set forth in the Bill
of Sale (Exhibit A), to K&K Truck Parts for $1,250, free and clear
of all Liens.

On Sept. 2, 2020, the Court entered the Order, which, among other
things, established the De Minimis Asset Sale Procedures.  

Pursuant to the De Minimis Asset Sale Procedures, the Debtors
submit the De Minimis Sale Notice in connection with their sale of
the Assets to the Purchaser.  

The total selling price for the Sale to the Purchaser is for
$1,250, which is under the limit set forth in the De Minimis Asset
Sale Procedures.  The Sale does not include payments to be made by
the Debtors on account of commission fees to agents, brokers or
auctioneers.  The Debtors intend to use the proceeds from the Sale
to fund the administration of these chapter 11 cases and, if
applicable, to distribute funds in accordance with the priority
scheme set forth in orders of the Court, their financing documents
and/or the Bankruptcy Code.  The Purchaser is not an insider of the
Debtors.  

The Objection Deadline is Oct. 21, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).  If no
objection to the De Minimis Sale Notice is timely filed and served
in accordance with it and the De Minimis Asset Sale procedures, the
Debtors may consummate the sale without further notice.

Copies of all filings in the Debtors' chapter 11 cases are
available for free on the website of the Court-appointed claims and
noticing agent in these chapter 11 cases, Donlin Recano & Co.,
Inc., at https://www.donlinrecano.com/Comcar.  

A copy of the Exhibit A is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yy24sqjo from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Comcar Industries

Comcar Industries is a transportation and logistics company
headquartered in Auburndale, Fla., with over 40
strategically-located terminal and satellite locations across the
United States.  For more information, visit https://comcar.com/

On May 17, 2020, Comcar Industries and related entities sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-11120).  In
the petitions signed by CRO Andrew Hinkelman, Comcar Industries was
estimated to have $50 million to $100 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the presiding judge.

The Debtors tapped DLA Piper LLP (US) as counsel; FTI Consulting,
Inc., as financial advisor; and Bluejay Advisors, LLC as investment
banker.  Donlin Recano & Company, Inc. is the claims agent.


CONSOLIDATED INFRASTRUCTURE: Comcast Dispute Resolved; Plan Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brendan L. Shannon on Oct. 27, 2020, entered an order
granting final approval and confirmation of the Combined Plan and
Disclosure Statement of Consolidated Infrastructure Group Inc.

The holders of Claims in Class 3 (General Unsecured Claims) have
voted to accept the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement in the
numbers and amounts required by section 1126(d) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

By agreement of Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC and
the Debtor: (a) to the extent necessary, Comcast is authorized, and
the automatic stay pursuant to section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code
is modified to permit Comcast, to recoup or exercise its right to
setoff $390,141 of the Comcast Claim; (b) the Comcast Claim is
reduced to, and Allowed as, a General Unsecured Claim in the
aggregate amount of  $1,641,697; (c) the Debtor, its Estate, and
each of the Debtor's successors and assigns (collectively, the
"Debtor Releasing Parties") remise, release, waive, and forever
discharge Comcast and related entities from all claims; (d) the
injunctions contained in the Confirmation Order and Article XII.C.
and D. of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement shall not
apply to Comcast's right to recoup or setoff $390,141 of the
Comcast Claim against the Payables or Comcast's right to assert
setoff or recoupment as a defense to any action brought against it
by the Debtor, the Post-Effective Date Debtor, or the Plan
Administrator; and (e) the set-off motion of Comcast is resolved.

A copy of the Plan Confirmation Order is available at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/BGPGSIQ/Consolidated_Infrastructure_Group__debke-19-10165__0542.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

                         Chapter 11 Plan

Consolidated Infrastructure Group Inc. submitted a Combined Plan
and Disclosure Statement.

Subsequent to the Petition Date, Gavin/Solmonese conducted a robust
marketing process in order to reach as many potential purchasers as
possible and to elicit the best and highest offer possible for the
Debtor's assets. Gavin/Solmonese's efforts included (a) contacting
approximately eighty-six (86) potential strategic and financial
acquirers to garner interest in pursuing a possible transaction,
(b) negotiating to completion nine (9) non-disclosure agreements
with interested parties, and (c) compiling, managing, and revising
an online data room where interested parties who submitted
non-disclosure agreements could review financial information,
contracts, leases, intellectual property, and other data pertaining
to the Debtor. Of these nine (9) interested parties, three (3)
expressed either a written or verbal indication of interest, two
(2) submitted non binding letters of intent, and two (2) engaged in
discussions with the Debtor's management.

Class 3 General Unsecured Claims totaling $19,000,000 will recover
1% to 2% of their claims. Each Holder of an Allowed General
Unsecured Claim in Class 3 shall receive its Pro Rata share of the
Class 3 Distribution.

On the Effective Date, all Equity Interests shall be cancelled and
released without any distribution or retention of any property on
account of such Equity Interests.

Allowed Claims and any amounts necessary to wind down the Debtor's
Estate shall be paid from: (a) Cash held by the Debtor as of the
Effective Date, and (b) Cash proceeds obtained after the Effective
Date, if any, from all sources, including the liquidation and
collection of the Debtor's remaining assets.

A full-text copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement
dated September 9, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y3bznxwh from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Daniel J. DeFranceschi
     Paul N. Heath
     Zachary I. Shapiro
     Brett M. Haywood
     Megan E. Kenney
     RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
     One Rodney Square
     920 North King Street
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801

                  About Consolidated Infrastructure

Created in 2016 and headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, Consolidated
Infrastructure Group, Inc., provides underground utility and damage
prevention services to support others that do underground
construction and maintenance. By providing detailed information on
what lies beneath the surface, CIG's damage prevention services
help protect communities from damage that could otherwise occur
when utilities, other companies, or individuals dig underground.

CIG sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 19-10165)
on Jan. 30, 2019. The Debtor disclosed $11.6 million in assets and
$9 million in liabilities as of Jan. 30, 2019.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. as legal counsel;
Gavin/Solmonese LLC as financial advisor and investment banker; and
Omni Management Group as claims and noticing agent.


CONSOLIDATED LAND: Competing Plans Slated for Hearing
-----------------------------------------------------
Competing plans have been filed in the Chapter 11 cases of
Consolidated Land Holdings, LLC, et al.

On Aug. 28, 2020, equity holder KCP Seven Ground, LLC ("KCP") and
Consolidated Land Holdings, LLC, et al., filed a Joint Disclosure
Statement and Joint Plan of Reorganization for the Debtors.  In the
Debtors' Plan, with respect to the Allowed Unsecured Claim of
Radisson, in full satisfaction of the Allowed Class 3 Claims,
holders of such claims shall receive a lump sum payment on the
Effective Date in the amount of $350,000 (the "Radisson Payment"),
funded from the equity infusion provided for in the Plan.  In
addition, Radisson has agreed to accept a license application from
the Appleton tenant which is now Acres Capital LLC and give
reasonable consideration to approval of same.  With respect to the
Allowed General Unsecured Claims, in addition to Allowed General
Unsecured Claims, Class 4 will include any deficiency claims
related to Class 1.  In full satisfaction of the Allowed Class 4
Claims, holders of such claims shall receive the remainder of the
Equity Infusion after  payment of Administrative Expense Claims and
the Radisson Payment.

On Aug. 28, 2020, Wells Fargo Bank filed a Liquidating Plan of
Reorganization for the Debtor.
Wells Fargo is the Debtors' only secured lender and the largest
creditor in the case with a claim of $75.2 million.  The Wells
Fargo Plan provides for the sale of the Debtors' property to the
successful bidder and the distribution of the proceeds of the sale
in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

On Sept.  9,  2020, the Court entered an order ruling that:

   * The Debtors' Disclosure Statement and Wells Fargo's Disclosure
Statement are conditionally approved.

   * A preliminary hearing will be held on the competing plans on
Oct. 14, 2020.

The Court will conduct a status conference on all pending matters
on Nov. 20, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.  The hearing scheduled for Nov. 20,
2020 at 9:30 a.m. will take place via ZOOM.  Register for Zoom
Meeting at https://pacer.flmb.uscourts.gov/fwxflmb/zoom/

                 About Consolidated Land Holdings

Consolidated Land Holdings and its subsidiaries are privately held
companies engaged in activities related to real estate.

Consolidated Land Holdings, LLC, and 21 affiliates concurrently
filed voluntary petitions seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 19-04760) on July
22, 2019. The petitions were signed by Joseph G. Gillespie III,
manager. At the time of filing, the Debtors estimated $50 million
to $100 million in both assets and liabilities.

The Debtors are represented by R Scott Shuker, Esq. at Latham,
Shuker, Eden & Beaudine, LLP.


CONTRACT TRANSPORT: Hires Frederic P. Schwieg as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Contract Transport Services, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio to hire Frederic
P. Schwieg, Attorney at Law, as its legal counsel.

The firm's services will include the preparation of pleadings,
examinations or depositions of witnesses, participation in
negotiations for the sale of Debtor's assets, and the preparation
of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

The firm will charge an hourly fee of $300.

Frederic P. Schwieg is a "disinterested person" within the meaning
of 11 U.S.C. 101(14), according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Frederic P. Schwieg, Esq.
     Frederic P. Schwieg, Attorney at Law
     19885 Detroit Rd #239
     Rocky River, OH 44116-1815
     Tel: 440-499-4506
     Email: fschwieg@schwieglaw.com  

                 About Contract Transport Services

Contract Transport Services, Inc. is a Cleveland-based  passenger
transportation company that began in 1997.  It regularly provides
transport for hotels all over NE Ohio as well as popular venues
throughout the region.  Visit http://www.ctsoh.netfor more
information.

Contract Transport filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No.
20-14502) on Oct. 6, 2020. Contract Transport President William
Madachik signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $252,528 in total
assets and $3,907,364 in total liabilities.

Judge Price Smith oversees the case.  Frederic P. Schwieg, Attorney
at Law serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


CORSAIR GAMING: Moody's Raises CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Corsair Gaming, Inc.'s Corporate
Family Rating to B1 from B2 and Probability of Default Rating to
B1-PD from B2-PD. Additionally, Moody's upgraded the company's
senior secured first lien revolving credit facility and senior
secured first lien term loan to B1 from B2 and assigned a
Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating of SGL-2. The outlook remains
stable.

The upgrade of Corsair's CFR to B1 reflects the company's strong
revenue growth and improved operating performance and the resulting
meaningful reduction in the company's leverage levels. The company
has reduced debt levels, including paying off its second lien term
loan. In accordance with public filings, Moody's believes Corsair
has utilized approximately $87 million of proceeds from its
September initial public offering to pay down its first lien senior
secured term loan. Moody's expects Corsair to utilize the remaining
proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes. Pro
forma for the debt repayment, debt to EBITDA leverage (Moody's
adjusted) was approximately 2.8x for the LTM period ended June 30,
2020. Moody's expects leverage to remain below 3x over the next 12
to 18 months, which supports the upgrade in the CFR.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by the action:

Ratings Upgraded:

Issuer: Corsair Gaming, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B1 from B2

  Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B1-PD from B2-PD

  Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Upgraded to B1 (LGD4) from
  B2 (LGD4)

  Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Upgraded to
  B1 (LGD4) from B2 (LGD4)

New Assignments:

Issuer: Corsair Gaming, Inc.

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-2

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Corsair Gaming, Inc.

  Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Corsair's B1 CFR is supported by its strong brand and market
position as one of the top three gaming peripheral makers, moderate
leverage, and strong revenue growth of over 40% year-to-date.
Moody's believes demand is being boosted in 2020 by consumers
staying at home more during the pandemic but that the higher
earnings level is sustainable, driven by expanding market share and
growing interest in Esports and high-end gaming that requires
high-performance PC peripherals, memory, power supply and cooling
equipment. Corsair's credit profile is constrained by the highly
competitive PC gaming hardware market and the limited defensible
patented intellectual property of the market participants, which
results in low profit margins. The credit profile is also
constrained by the short life cycles of Corsair's products and
investments required to support sales growth. While the company is
now public following its September 2020 initial public offering, it
remains a controlled company and Moody's believes that the company
will continue to make tuck in acquisitions and there is leveraging
event risk related to monetization of EagleTree Capital's remaining
76% ownership stake in the company.

The company's assigned SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating
indicates good liquidity and is supported by Corsair's cash
balances, an undrawn $50 million revolver (availability reduced by
minimal letters of credit) and Moody's expectation of positive free
cash flow. As of June 30, 2020, Corsair had $107 million of
unrestricted cash on hand. Pro-forma for the IPO proceeds and debt
paydown, Moody's estimates Corsair's cash on hand to be about $92
million. Over the next 12 to 18 months, Moody's expects Corsair to
generate meaningful free cash flow. Corsair's cash and projected
free cash flow provide ample coverage of the $4.75 million required
annual term loan amortization, payable quarterly. However, Moody's
positive free cash flow forecast is subject to risks such as
tariffs and investment needs that may reduce free cash flow. As of
June 30, 2020, Corsair had a fully available $50 million revolver
that expires on August 28, 2022. Moody's does not expect the
revolver to be drawn. While seasonal working capital needs for
Corsair typically peak in the first and third quarter annually,
Moody's expects the company's cash balances and internal cash flow
generation to sufficiently address working capital needs. The
revolver is governed by a springing net debt-to-EBITDA leverage
covenant of 8x, which is triggered when usage exceeds 35%. Moody's
does not expect the covenant to be triggered or tested over the
next 12 months and believes there is significant cushion within the
8x leverage covenant. There are no financial maintenance covenants
on the company's term loan.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Corsair will
maintain its strong brand and market position, debt-to-EBITDA will
remain well below 4x and free cash flow to debt will remain above
5% over the next 12 months.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company gains scale and
diversity, maintains debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) below 2.5x
and commits to a conservative financial policy. An upgrade would
also require consistent strong organic revenue growth supported by
strong investment and product development, a flat to higher EBITDA
margin, free cash flow to debt exceeding 10% and good liquidity.

The ratings could be downgraded if Corsair's organic revenue or
gross margins decline, leverage sustainably increases above 4x
debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) or free cash flow to debt is
sustained below 5%. In addition, any deterioration in liquidity
such as a consistently high revolver balance or reduced free cash
flow could also result in a downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Diversified
Technology published in August 2018.

Corsair, based in Fremont, California, designs and markets desktop
computer gaming peripherals and components, including high
performance computer memory, gaming headsets, keyboards, and mice.
Corsair is owned by EagleTree Capital, L.P., limited partner
coinvestors, public shareholders and Corsair senior management. The
company generated revenue of approximately $1.3 billion in the LTM
period ended June 30, 2020.


CRGR LLC: $270K Sale of Hendersonville to Abad Approved
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Randal S. Mashburn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Tennessee authorized CRGR, LLC's sale of the
real property located at 103 Cloverdale Court, Hendersonville,
Tennessee to Miguel Abad for $270,000.

The closing of the sale is Nov. 30, 2020.

As a condition of the sale, Citizens Bank will be paid the Release
Fee at closing and will cause the Deed of Trust on the Real
Property to be released.

At the closing of the sale of the Real Property, the Debtor is
authorized to pay from the Purchase Price the outstanding property
taxes due to the Sumner County Trustee, approved real estate
commissions, and all normal and customary closing charges set forth
in the Sale Motion.  All net proceeds from the sale will be
remitted by the Debtor in strict conformance with the Agreed Order
Granting Trustee John C. McLemore's Expedited Motion for Turnover
of Funds entered on Oct. 26, 2020.

The 14-day stay of the order approving the sale under Fed. R.
Bankr. P. 6004(h) is waived.

           About CRGR, LLC

CRGR, LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No.
20-02989) on June 18, 2020.  The Debtor tapped Steven L. Lefkovitz,
Esq., at Lefkovitz & Lefkovitz as counsel.



CROSSROADS COLLISION: Selling San Antonio Property for $863K
------------------------------------------------------------
Crossroads Collision Holdings, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Texas to authorize the sale of its
automotive repair shop at 8803 Oakland Rd., San Antonio, Texas and
the automotive repair equipment located therein, to Todd Jesse
Evans and Kelly Jean Rabedeau and/or assigns for $863,000, plus
payment of certain taxes.

Prior to the Bankruptcy filing, the Debtor operated an automotive
repair shop at the Real Property.  It desires to sell both the real
property and the automotive repair equipment located therein.  The
Debtor owns record title to the Property.

The Debtor desires to sell the Property to the Buyers for the sum
of $863,000, plus payment of certain taxes, on the terms of the
Letter of Intent.  The sale contemplates that the Buyers will
assume the obligations of Spirt of Texas Bancshares, Inc. and
United States Small Business Administration.  The parties'
obligations to consummate the transactions contemplated in the
Agreement will be Conditioned upon the Court's entry of the
Approval Order.

The sale is part of a funding mechanism for the Plan.  The Debtor
asks to sell the Property prior to confirmation of the Plan.  The
test is whether there is a sound business reason for the sale,
adequate and reasonable notice to interested parties has been
provided; the sale price is fair and reasonable and the proposed
buyer is proceeding in good faith.

The sale will be made "as is, where is," with no representations or
warranties of any kind, except as set forth in the Contract.

There is a 14-day option period for the Buyers to terminate the
contract for which MC has paid the sum of $1,000.  Upon information
and belief, the provision has been waived or resolved.

These entities assert a lien on the Property:

      a. Bexar County has filed a proof of claim (Claim No. 1)
asserting a tax lien on the property to secure a debt in the
approximate amount of $61,295.  The 2020 prorated property taxes
through August and the back property taxes for 2019 in the amount
of$24,639 and $5,463 will be covered by the Buyers.

      b. Spirit of Texas Bancshares, Inc. has filed a proof of
claim (Claim No. 5) asserting a deed of trust lien and a UCC-1 lien
on the Property to secure a claim in the amount of $494,385.

      c. United States Small Business Administration has filed a
proof of claim (Claim No. 6) asserting a deed of trust lien and a
UCC-1 lien on the Property to secure a claim in the amount of
$355,876.

      d. Sergio Garza, one of the principals of the Debtor may
assert an administrative claim for insurance premiums he has paid
on the property since the bankruptcy filing.

In accordance with the terms of the Contract, the Debtor proposes
to sell the Property free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.


There are no Realtor Fees.  It is uncertain whether the Buyers are
asking a Title Policy and/or who will be responsible for paying
same.  From the proceeds, the Debtor proposes to pay all normal and
customary cost of closing including survey cost and title policy,
if any.  It further asks that all insurance payments made by Sergio
Garza be reimbursed and that all United States Trustee fees owed or
to be owed be paid from the proceeds.  The balance of the monies
will be paid to the secured creditors identified.

A copy of the Letter of Intent is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yxafm9e2 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.
  
                About Crossroads Collision Holdings

Crossroads Collision Holdings, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Case No. 20-50094) on
Jan. 9, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
assets of between $500,001 and $1 million and liabilities of the
same range.  Judge Craig A. Gargotta oversees the case.  The Debtor
is represented by the Law Offices of Dean W. Greer.


DELUXE EXPRESS: Plan Filing Deadline Extended to Nov. 30
--------------------------------------------------------
Deluxe Express, Inc., sought and obtained approval of its motion to
its deadline to file a Chapter 11 Plan.  Judge Cleary has ordered
that the Debtor's plan filing deadline is extended to and including
Nov. 30, 2020.

                       About Deluxe Express

Deluxe Express, Inc., is a freight shipping and trucking company
running freight hauling business from Plainfield, Illinois.

Deluxe Express filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 20-13381) on
July 1, 2020. The petition was signed by Deluxe Express President
Igoris Geguzinskas. At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
total assets of $1,032,142 and total liabilities of $2,694,778.
Judge David C. Cleary oversees the case.

The Debtor has tapped Gutnicki, LLP as its bankruptcy counsel and
the Law Offices of David Freydin, PC as its corporate counsel.


DIAMOND COACH: Seeks Approval to Hire Dunham Hildebrand as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Diamond Coach Leasing, LLC and Diamond Coach Interiors, LLC seek
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Tennessee to employ Dunham Hildebrand, PLLC as their counsel.

Dunham Hildebrand will render these legal services to the Debtors:

     (a) Render legal advice with respect to the rights, powers and
duties of the Debtors in the management of their property;

     (b) Investigate and, if necessary, institute legal action on
behalf of the Debtors to collect and recover assets of the estates
of the Debtors;

     (c) Prepare all necessary pleadings, orders and reports with
respect to this proceeding and to render all other necessary or
proper legal services;

     (d) Assist and counsel the Debtors in the preparation,
presentation and confirmation of its disclosure statements and
plans of reorganization;

     (e) Represent the Debtors as may be necessary to protect their
interests; and

     (f) Perform all other legal services that may be necessary and
appropriate in the general administration of the Debtors' estates.

The firm's current standard hourly rates are:

     Attorneys      $350 - $400
     Paralegals     $150 - $175

In addition, the firm will charge for all expenses actually
incurred on behalf of the Debtors.

Prior to the filing of these bankruptcy cases, Diamond Coach
Leasing, LLC paid $122,468 to the firm related to the preparation
and filing of this bankruptcy case and the aforementioned district
court litigation, inclusive of fees and expenses. In addition,
Diamond Coach Leasing paid $3,434 for the Chapter 11 filing fees in
these cases. The firm is holding $28,144.30 as a retainer that the
firm will continue to hold in trust until the issuance of an order
from the Court approving any subsequently filed fee application.

Griffin S. Dunham, an attorney and member of Dunham Hildebrand,
PLLC, disclosed in court filings that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Griffin S. Dunham, Esq.
     R. Alex Payne, Esq.
     DUNHAM HILDEBRAND, PLLC
     2416 21st Avenue South, Suite 303
     Nashville, TN 37212
     Telephone: (615) 933-5850
     E-mail: griffin@dhnashville.com
   
                    About Diamond Coach Leasing

Diamond Coach Leasing, LLC and Diamond Coach Interiors, LLC are
providers of luxury Prevost entertainer coaches based in
Tennessee.

Diamond Coach Leasing and Diamond Coach Interiors filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case Nos. 20-04545 and 20-04546) on Oct. 9,
2020. The petitions were signed by Kylee Ervin, president. At the
time of the filing, Diamond Coach Leasing estimated to have
$704,468 in total assets and $43,064,325 in total liabilities,
while Diamond Coach Interiors disclosed $2,929 in total assets and
$38,183,685 in total liabilities. Judges Randal S. Mashburn and
Charles M. Walker oversees the cases. The Debtors tapped Dunham
Hildebrand, PLLC as counsel, Steve Curnutte as chief restructuring
officer, and Tortola Advisors, LLC as restructuring advisors.


DIAMOND COACH: Seeks to Hire Tortola Advisors, Appoint CRO
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtors Diamond Coach Leasing, LLC and Diamond Coach Interiors, LLC
seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Tennessee to employ Steve Curnutte as chief
restructuring officer and Tortola Advisors, LLC as restructuring
advisor.

Mr. Curnutte and Tortola Advisors will render these services:

     (a) Develop, with the assistance of the Debtors, a pro forma
cash flow analysis;

     (b) Develop, with the assistance of the Debtors, a go-forward
plan;

     (c) Analyze the Debtors' assets and determine whether each
asset is necessary or useful to the Debtors' go-forward business
plan, and to the extent any such assets are not useful or
necessary, assist the Debtors in disposing of and monetizing the
asset;

     (d) Authorize and execute the payment of expenses incurred by
the Debtors in connection with the services to the extent
authorized by the Debtors' budget;

     (e) Hire, discharge, manage, and control the Debtors'
employees and staff, as Tortola determines necessary or advisable;

     (f) Develop, with the assistance of the Debtors and counsel,
strategic planning to improve the financial oversight and process
of the Debtors;

     (g) Design, install, and maintain financial disciplines with
the assistance of the Debtors;

     (h) Negotiate, execute, and deliver any agreements, documents,
or instruments on behalf of the Debtors which Tortola and Mr.
Curnutte deem necessary or advisable to perform services;

     (i) Negotiate and compromise claims by or against the
Debtors;

     (j) Investigate and determine whether all revenues have been
properly accounted for, and take all reasonable and necessary
action to recover revenues that have been diverted from the Debtors
or otherwise improperly applied or handled; and

     (k) Take all other actions deemed reasonable and necessary to
perform the services and generally do, execute, and perform any
other act, deed, matter, or thing that Tortola reasonably believes
ought to be done, and executed.

Prior to the petition date, the Debtors agreed to pay Mr. Curnutte
and Tortola the indivisible, collective sum of $32,500 per month.
In addition, the Debtors agreed to pay Tortola a completion fee of
$350,000 upon the sale, refinance, or substantive resolution of the
Debtors' senior debt owed to ServisFirst Bank. The Debtors further
agreed to pay any and all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with the engagement.

Steve Curnutte, a member of Tortola Advisors, LLC, disclosed in
court filings that he and the firm are "disinterested persons" as
that term is defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Steve Curnutte
     TORTOLA ADVISORS, LLC
     2216 Abbott Martin Road, Suite 220
     Nashville, TN 37215
     Telephone: (615) 916-5296
     E-mail: stevec@tortolaadvisors.com
     
                    About Diamond Coach Leasing

Diamond Coach Leasing, LLC and Diamond Coach Interiors, LLC are
providers of luxury Prevost entertainer coaches based in
Tennessee.

Diamond Coach Leasing and Diamond Coach Interiors filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case Nos. 20-04545 and 20-04546) on Oct. 9,
2020. The petitions were signed by Kylee Ervin, president. At the
time of the filing, Diamond Coach Leasing estimated to have
$704,468 in total assets and $43,064,325 in total liabilities,
while Diamond Coach Interiors disclosed $2,929 in total assets and
$38,183,685 in total liabilities. Judges Randal S. Mashburn and
Charles M. Walker oversees the cases. The Debtors tapped Dunham
Hildebrand, PLLC as counsel, Steve Curnutte as chief restructuring
officer, and Tortola Advisors, LLC as restructuring advisors.


EAST CAROLINA: Plan Deadline Extended to Nov. 24
------------------------------------------------
East Carolina Commercial Services, LLC, sought and obtained a
60-day order extending its deadline to file a Plan of
Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.  The order signed by Judge
Joseph Callaway provides that the Debtor will have until November
24, 2020 to file a Plan and Disclosure Statement.

In seeking an extension, the Debtor explained that in both 2018 and
2019, the Debtor generated gross revenue of over immediately
preceding the filing of this case, the Debtor abandoned its primary
revenue source and began the process of rebuilding its business
model from the ground up. That project has been largely successful
with gross revenues hovering between $ 150,000 and $200,000 per
month, but the ninety-days that the Debtor has been in this case is
simply too small a sample size from which to make any kind of
data-based projection of income and expenses that interested
parties in the case could utilize in determining their support for
the plan.  An additional sixty days would allow the plan to contain
five full months of financial records on which to base the proposed
treatment of its various creditors.

Attorney for Debtor:

     Philip Sasser
     Suite 230
     Cary, NC 27518
     2000 Regency Parkway
     Tel: 919.319.7400

              About East Carolina Commercial Services

East Carolina Commercial Services, LLC is a commercial solar
installation company specializing in module installation and
racking installation based in Wilson, North Carolina.

East Carolina Commercial Services sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 20-02361) on
June 27, 2020. The petition was signed by Caesar Mendoza, Debtor's
managing member. At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed assets
of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of the same range.
Judge Joseph N. Callaway oversees the case.  Sasser Law
Firm is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Hire Kelley Drye as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors Red Reef Alternative Investments, LLC and Emergent Capital,
Inc. seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware to employ Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as special counsel.

The services that Kelley Drye & Warren will render are as follows:

     a. Corporate and transactional matters;
     b. Labor and employment matters;
     c. Employee benefit and compensation matters;
     d. Financing matters;
     e. Litigation matters; and
     f. Securities matters, among others.

The firm's current standard hourly rates are:

     Partners             $705 - $1,245
     Special Counsel        $585 - $840
     Associates             $435 - $805
     Paraprofessionals      $200 - $365

Kelley Drye & Warren has historically provided the Debtors with a
20% discount from its rates for legal services rendered and will
continue to do so during their Chapter 11 cases.  In addition, the
firm will receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses.

James Carr, Esq., a partner at Kelley Drye, disclosed in court
filings that the firm is a "disinterested person" as that term is
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The attorney also made the following disclosures in response to the
request for additional information set forth in Paragraph D.1 of
the Revised U.S. Trustee Guidelines:

   Question: Did you agree to any variations from, or alternatives
to, your
standard or customary billing arrangements for this engagement?

   Answer: No.

   Question: Do any of the professionals included in this
engagement vary their
rate based on the geographic location of the bankruptcy case?

   Answer: No.

   Question: If you represented the client in the 12 months
pre-petition, disclose your billing rates and material financial
terms for the pre-petition
engagement, including any adjustments within the 12 months
prepetition. If your billing rates and material financial terms
have changed post-petition, explain the difference and the reasons
for the difference.

   Answer: Kelley Drye has represented the Debtors in the 12 months
prior to the
bankruptcy filing.  The firm has historically provided a 20%
discount from its rates for legal services rendered on behalf of
the Debtors, and will continue to do so during their Chapter 11
cases.  The firm's standard billing rates for the 12 months
pre-petition are as follows.

   Title                   2019 Rates        2020 Rates
   -----                 -------------     -------------
   Partners              $680 - $1,075     $705 - $1,245
   Special Counsel       $540 - $800       $585 - $840
   Associates            $415 - $760       $435 - $805
   Paraprofessionals     $185 - $300       $200 - $365

   Question: Has your client approved your prospective budget and
staffing plan
and, if so, for what budget period.

   Answer: The Debtors approved the firm's prospective budget and
staffing plan for the period October 15 to December 31, 2020.

Kelley Drye can be reached through:
   
     James Carr, Esq.
     Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
     101 Park Ave.
     New York, NY 10178
     Telephone: (212) 808-7955
     Facsimile: (212) 808-7897

                      About Emergent Capital

Emergent Capital Inc. (OTCQX: EMGC) is a specialty finance company
that invests in life settlements.  Emergent Capital, through its
subsidiaries, owns a 27.5% equity interest in White Eagle Asset
Portfolio, LP, which holds a valuable portfolio of life settlement
assets.  Visit http://www.emergentcapital.comfor more information.


On Oct. 15, 2020, Emergent Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiary
Red Reef Alternative Investment, LLC filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-12602).  Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer of
Emergent Capital, signed the petitions.

Emergent Capital disclosed $175.1 million in assets and $115.9
million in liabilities as of May 31, 2020, while Red Reef
Alternative Investment estimated to have less than $50,000 in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as
special litigation counsel; Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as general
non-bankruptcy counsel; Winston & Strawn LLP as tax counsel; and
RSM US, LLP as valuation advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
is the administrative advisor.


EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Hire Kurtzman as Administrative Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------------
Emergent Capital, Inc. and Red Reef Alternative Investments, LLC
seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as their
administrative advisor.

The firm will perform the following services to the Debtors:

     (a) assist with, among other things, solicitation, balloting,
tabulation and calculation of votes, as well as prepare any
appropriate reports required in furtherance of confirmation of any
Chapter 11 plan;

     (b) generate an official ballot certification and testify, if
necessary, in support of the ballot tabulation results for any
Chapter 11 plan in Debtors' bankruptcy cases; and

     (c) provide such other noticing, solicitation, balloting and
administrative services, as may be requested by the Debtors from
time to time.

Prior to the petition date, the firm received a retainer in the
amount of $30,000 from Imperial Finance & Trading, LLC, a
non-debtor wholly-owned subsidiary of Emergent Capital.

Evan Gershbein, executive vice president of corporate restructuring
services at Kurtzman, disclosed in court filings that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as that term is defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Evan Gershbein
     Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
     222 N. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 300
     El Segundo, CA 90245
     Telephone: (310) 751-1803
     Email: egershbein@kccllc.com

                      About Emergent Capital

Emergent Capital Inc. (otcqx:EMGC) is a specialty finance company
that invests in life settlements.  Emergent Capital, through its
subsidiaries, owns a 27.5% equity interest in White Eagle Asset
Portfolio, LP, which holds a valuable portfolio of life settlement
assets.  Visit http://www.emergentcapital.comfor more information.


On Oct. 15, 2020, Emergent Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiary
Red Reef Alternative Investment, LLC filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-12602).  Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer of
Emergent Capital, signed the petitions.

Emergent Capital disclosed $175.1 million in assets and $115.9
million in liabilities as of May 31, 2020, while Red Reef
Alternative Investment estimated to have less than $50,000 in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as
special litigation counsel; Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as general
non-bankruptcy counsel; Winston & Strawn LLP as tax counsel; and
RSM US, LLP as valuation advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
is the administrative advisor.


EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Hire RSM US as Valuation Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------
Emergent Capital, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to employ RSM US, LLP as its
valuation advisor.

The Debtor desires to retain RSM to provide a valuation analysis of
the fair value of Emergent Capital's 27.5% equity investment in
White Eagle Asset Portfolio, LLP.

RSM's services will not duplicate the services that other
professionals will be providing the Debtor in this case.

RSM has agreed to charge a fixed fee for the engagement of $14,000
to $16,000.

In addition, RSM may bill additional time at its standard hourly
rates on a time-and-materials basis at 80% of its then applicable
standard hourly rates if additional work is required on the
valuation report or for testimony in connection therewith.

RSM's current customary hourly rates are as follows:

     Partners                              $620 - $730
     Senior Directors and Senior Managers  $455 - $625
     Managers                              $310 - $425
     Supervisors and Senior Associates     $210 - $300
     Associates                            $175 - $205

In addition, the firm will receive reimbursement for reasonable and
documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the
services rendered to the Debtors.

Kenton Thompson of RSM US, LLP, disclosed in court filings that the
firm is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Kenton Thompson
     RSM US, LLP
     151 West 42nd Street, 19th Floor
     New York, NY, 10036
     Telephone: (212) 372-1000

                      About Emergent Capital

Emergent Capital Inc. (otcqx:EMGC) is a specialty finance company
that invests in life settlements.  Emergent Capital, through its
subsidiaries, owns a 27.5% equity interest in White Eagle Asset
Portfolio, LP, which holds a valuable portfolio of life settlement
assets.  Visit http://www.emergentcapital.comfor more information.


On Oct. 15, 2020, Emergent Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiary
Red Reef Alternative Investment, LLC filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-12602).  Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer of
Emergent Capital, signed the petitions.

Emergent Capital disclosed $175.1 million in assets and $115.9
million in liabilities as of May 31, 2020, while Red Reef
Alternative Investment estimated to have less than $50,000 in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as
special litigation counsel; Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as general
non-bankruptcy counsel; Winston & Strawn LLP as tax counsel; and
RSM US, LLP as valuation advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
is the administrative advisor.


EMERGENT CAPITAL: Seeks to Tap Winston & Strawn as Tax Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Emergent Capital, Inc. and Red Reef Alternative Investments, LLC
seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Winston & Strawn LLP as tax counsel.

The services that Winston will render are as follows:

     (a) advise the Debtors regarding tax matters; and

     (b) take all necessary actions in furtherance of providing
such tax advice, including, without limitation:

       (1) advising the Debtors on the conduct of their Chapter 11
cases;

       (2) attending meetings and otherwise communicating with
Debtors' other professionals;

       (3) negotiating with representatives of creditors and other
parties-in-interest;

       (4) preparing or reviewing pleadings;

       (5) advising the Debtors in connection with any potential
sale of assets;

       (6) appearing before the bankruptcy court and any appellate
courts; and

       (7) advising the Debtors in connection with any disclosure
statement, Chapter 11 plan and all related documents.

The firm's current standard hourly rates are:

     Partners         $615 - $1,740
     Of Counsel       $745 - $1,120
     Associates         $580 - $915
     Paralegals         $195 - $395
     Practice Support   $155 - $625

In addition, the firm will receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Carrie Hardman, Esq., a partner at Winston & Strawn, disclosed in
court filings that the firm is a "disinterested person" as that
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The attorney also made the following disclosures in response to the
request for additional information set forth in Paragraph D.1 of
the Revised U.S. Trustee Guidelines:

   Question: Did you agree to any variations from, or alternatives
to, your standard or customary billing arrangements for this
engagement?

   Answer: Winston & Strawn has provided the Debtors with a 10%
discount
from October 13, 2020 forward, which includes work performed in
connection with their Chapter 11 cases, among others.  The hourly
rates Winston & Strawn will bill for its employment are comparable
to the rates that the firm charges other comparable Chapter 11
clients, and the rate structure provided by the firm is appropriate
and is not significantly different from (i) the rates that the firm
charges in other non-bankruptcy representations or (ii) the rates
of other comparably skilled professionals for similar engagements.


   Question: Do any of the professionals included in this
engagement vary their rate based on the geographic location of the
bankruptcy case?

   Answer: No.

   Question: If you represented the client in the 12 months
pre-petition, disclose your billing rates and material financial
terms for the pre-petition engagement, including any adjustments
during the 12 months pre-petition. If your
billing rates and material financial terms have changed
post-petition,
explain the difference and the reasons for the difference.

   Answer: Winston & Strawn's rates in 2019 were as follows:

     Category            U.S. Rate Range
     --------            ---------------
     Partners            $745 - $1,650
     Of Counsel          $685 - $1,185
     Associates          $540 - $860
     Paralegals          $195 - $390
     Practice Support    $155 - $600

   Subject to discounts applied from October 13, 2020 forward,
Winston & Strawn's rates in 2020 were as follows:

     Category            U.S. Rate Range
     --------            ---------------
     Partners            $615 - $1,740
     Of Counsel          $745 - $1,120
     Associates          $580 - $915
     Paralegals          $195 - $395
     Practice Support    $155 - $625

Such rates were subject to the same periodic increases from 2018 to
2020
which, like many of its peer law firms, occurs twice a year in the
form of:
(i) step increases historically awarded in the ordinary course on
the basis
of advancing seniority and promotion and (ii) periodic increases
within
each attorney's and paraprofessional's current level of seniority.
The step
increases do not constitute "rate increases" (as the term is used
in the U.S.
guidelines for reviewing fee applications filed under Section 330
by attorneys in
larger Chapter 11 cases).

   Question: Has your client approved your prospective budget and
staffing plan, and, if so for what budget period?

   Answer: Although the Debtors and Winston & Strawn have not
prepared a formal budget and staffing plan, the firm provided the
Debtors with periodic estimates of fees expected to be incurred.
The firm will provide further estimates upon
the Debtors' request.  

Winston & Strawn can be reached through:
   
     Carrie V. Hardman, Esq.
     Winston & Strawn LLP
     200 Park Avenue
     New York, NY 10166-4193
     Telephone: (212) 294-6700
     Facsimile: (212) 294-4700
     Email: chardman@winston.com

                      About Emergent Capital

Emergent Capital Inc. (OTCQX: EMGC) is a specialty finance company
that invests in life settlements.  Emergent Capital, through its
subsidiaries, owns a 27.5% equity interest in White Eagle Asset
Portfolio, LP, which holds a valuable portfolio of life settlement
assets.  Visit http://www.emergentcapital.comfor more information.


On Oct. 15, 2020, Emergent Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiary
Red Reef Alternative Investment, LLC filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-12602).  Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer of
Emergent Capital, signed the petitions.

Emergent Capital disclosed $175.1 million in assets and $115.9
million in liabilities as of May 31, 2020, while Red Reef
Alternative Investment estimated to have less than $50,000 in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as
special litigation counsel; Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as general
non-bankruptcy counsel; Winston & Strawn LLP as tax counsel; and
RSM US, LLP as valuation advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
is the administrative advisor.


EMERGENT CAPITAL: Taps Curtis Mallet-Prevost as Litigation Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Emergent Capital, Inc. and Red Reef Alternative Investments, LLC
seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as
special litigation counsel.

The Debtors need the firm's legal assistance in connection with the
lawsuit captioned as Phyllis Pohl, et al. v. Lincoln Benefit Life
Company, et al., Case No. 50-2019-CA-000521, pending in the Circuit
Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County,
Fla.

The firm's standard hourly rates are as follows:

     Partners                 $895 - $1,100
     Associates and Counsel   $415 - $775
     Trainees                 $310 - $350
     Legal Assistants         $255 - $285
     Managing Clerk                  $610
     Other Support Personnel  $100 - $310

In addition, Curtis Mallet will receive reimbursement for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Gabriel Hertzberg, Esq., a partner at Curtis Mallet-Prevost,
disclosed in court filings that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Gabriel Hertzberg, Esq.
     Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP
     101 Park Ave.
     New York, NY 10178
     Telephone: (212) 696-8856
     Facsimile: (917) 368-7356

                      About Emergent Capital

Emergent Capital Inc. (otcqx:EMGC) is a specialty finance company
that invests in life settlements.  Emergent Capital, through its
subsidiaries, owns a 27.5% equity interest in White Eagle Asset
Portfolio, LP, which holds a valuable portfolio of life settlement
assets.  Visit http://www.emergentcapital.comfor more information.


On Oct. 15, 2020, Emergent Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiary
Red Reef Alternative Investment, LLC filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-12602).  Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer of
Emergent Capital, signed the petitions.

Emergent Capital disclosed $175.1 million in assets and $115.9
million in liabilities as of May 31, 2020, while Red Reef
Alternative Investment estimated to have less than $50,000 in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as
special litigation counsel; Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as general
non-bankruptcy counsel; Winston & Strawn LLP as tax counsel; and
RSM US, LLP as valuation advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
is the administrative advisor.


EMERGENT CAPITAL: Taps Pachulski Stang as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Emergent Capital, Inc. and Red Reef Alternative Investments, LLC
seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP as their
legal counsel.

The firm will perform the following services to the Debtors:

     (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' powers
and duties in the continued operation of their business and
management of their property;

     (b) prepare legal papers;

     (c) appear in court;

     (d) prepare and pursue confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan and
approval of a disclosure statement; and

     (e) perform other legal services for the Debtors that may be
necessary in their Chapter 11 proceedings.

The standard hourly rates of the firm's professionals are as
follows:

     Partners           $725 - $1,495
     Of Counsel         $650 - $1,125
     Associates           $625 - $650
     Paraprofessionals    $350 - $450

In addition, the Debtors will be charged for out-of-pocket expenses
incurred by the firm.

The firm received payment in the amount of $598,964 from Imperial
Finance & Trading, LLC, wholly-owned subsidiary of Emergent
Capital, during the year prior to the petition date.

Richard Pachulski, Esq., an attorney at Pachulski, disclosed in
court filings that the firm is a "disinterested person" as that
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Pachulski also made the following disclosures in response to
the request for additional information set forth in Paragraph D.1
of the Revised U.S. Trustee Guidelines:

   Question: Did you agree to any variations from, or alternatives
to, your standard or customary billing arrangements for this
engagement?

   Answer: No.

   Question: Do any of the professionals included in this
engagement vary their rate based on the geographic location of the
bankruptcy case?

   Answer: No.

   Question: If you represented the client in the 12 months
pre-petition,
disclose your billing rates and material financial terms for the
pre-petition engagement, including any adjustments during the 12
months
pre-petition. If your billing rates and material financial terms
have changed post-petition, explain the difference and reasons for
the difference.  

   Answer: Pachulski represented the Debtors in the 12-month period
prior to their bankruptcy filing.  During such representation, the
billing rates for Pachulski remained the same as the billing rates
proposed by the firm except for regular annual adjustments.  The
material financial terms for the pre-petition engagement remained
the same as the
engagement was hourly-based.

   The billing rates and material financial terms for the
post-petition period remain the same as the pre-bankruptcy period.
The standard hourly rates of Pachulski are subject to periodic
adjustment in accordance with the firm's practice.  

   Question: Has your client approved your respective budget and
staffing
plan, and, if so, for what budget period?

   Answer: Yes. The Debtors have approved the budget and staffing
plan for
approximately the first 13 weeks of the cases.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Richard M. Pachulski, Esq.
     Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones, LLP
     10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90067-4003
     Telephone: (310) 277-6910
     Facsimile: (310) 201-0760
     Email: rpachulski@pszjlaw.com

                      About Emergent Capital

Emergent Capital Inc. (OTCQX: EMGC) is a specialty finance company
that invests in life settlements.  Emergent Capital, through its
subsidiaries, owns a 27.5% equity interest in White Eagle Asset
Portfolio, LP, which holds a valuable portfolio of life settlement
assets.  Visit http://www.emergentcapital.comfor more information.


On Oct. 15, 2020, Emergent Capital and its wholly-owned subsidiary
Red Reef Alternative Investment, LLC filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-12602).  Miriam Martinez, chief financial officer of
Emergent Capital, signed the petitions.

Emergent Capital disclosed $175.1 million in assets and $115.9
million in liabilities as of May 31, 2020, while Red Reef
Alternative Investment estimated to have less than $50,000 in both
assets and liabilities.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon oversees the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as
special litigation counsel; Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as general
non-bankruptcy counsel; Winston & Strawn LLP as tax counsel; and
RSM US, LLP as valuation advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC
is the administrative advisor.


ENGINEERED PROPULSION: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------
Engineered Propulsion Systems, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Wisconsin to authorize the bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all assets
to EPS Engineered Propulsion Systems, Inc. for a price comprised of
payment or assumption of secured debt, a credit bid, and the
assumption of obligations under executory contracts to be assumed
by the Buyer in the estimated sum of $1,400,520, pursuant to their
Asset Purchase Agreement, subject to overbid.

Despite the similarity of the Buyer's name to EPS, the Buyer is not
an affiliate, subsidiary or otherwise related to EPS; however, the
Buyer is a creditor of EPS.  The Buyer is the lender under the
Working Capital Loan and it holds Convertible Notes in the
outstanding principal amount of $12,329,820, and with a value as of
the Petition Date of $13,871,305.

In addition, pursuant to the Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement
dated as of July 31, 2020, and various orders entered by the Court,
the Buyer is lender under EPS’s senior secured post-petition
facility pursuant to which it obtained post-petition financing from
the Buyer in the amount of not less than $2.5 million, which amount
may be subject to adjustment, depending upon the timing of the
approval of the sale.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owed approximately $23,540,431
in outstanding debt, comprised of: (a) secured loans from First
National Community Bank ("FNCB"), (b) a secured loan (the from the
Wisconsin Economic Development Corp., administered by the Wisconsin
Department of Administration, (c) a loan secured by a purchase
money security interest in certain equipment from U.S. Bank
Equipment Finance ("USBEC"), (d) several tranches of secured
funding from the parties-in-interest listed on Exhibit B, whose
financings were made in the form of convertible secured promissory
notes, and, (e) a $250,000 secured loan from the Buyer ("Working
Capital Lender") for pre-petition working capital purposes.

As of the Petition Date, the aggregate outstanding principal
balance of the FNCB Loans is $1,415,463.  The WI Loan is evidenced
by an Amended Promissory Note and corresponding security agreement,
dated Nov. 16, 2016.  As of the Petition Date, the aggregate
outstanding principal balance of the WI Loan is $253,692.  The
USBEC Loan was used to finance the Debtor's purchase of
specificequipment and is secured by a purchase money security
interest in such equipment.  As of the Petition Date, the aggregate
outstanding principal balance of the USBEC Loan is $71,000.  

The Convertible Notes are evidenced by various notes, purchase
agreements, and other documents, including security agreements.  
The Convertible Notes, enjoy differing lien priorities on the
Intellectual property of the Debtor, as described more particularly
on Exhibit B.  As of the Petition Date, however, the aggregate
outstanding principalbalance of the Convertible Notes is
$21,511,667.  The Buyer, as ultimate assignee of Windecker PA
Power, LLC and Alite GmbH, holds Convertible Notes in the aggregate
principal and interest amount of approximately $13,871,305 (as of
the Petition Date).  Based on the amount being offered by the
Buyer, it does not appear the Convertible Note Holders, regardless
of priority, will participate in any dividend as a result of the
proposed sale.

On July 27, 2020, the Debtor obtained the Working Capital Loan from
the Working Capital Lender in contemplation of the chapter 11
filing.  The Working Capital Loan is evidenced by a Fixed Rate Note
dated July 27, 2020 and a security agreement.  As of the Petition
Date, the outstanding principal balance of the Working Capital Loan
was $250,000.  The Working Capital Loan is secured by a security
interests in and liens on the Prepetition Collateral and has since
been rolled into the DIP Loan.

EPS' management and board have approved the APA.  The Buyer has
agreed to serve as the stalking horse bidder for the Property,
subject to an auction and sale process pursuant to which the Debtor
can select the highest or otherwise best offer as determined in its
business judgment.

The terms of the sale under the APA are sophisticated and
complicated, but may be summarized as follows:

     a) Assets: The Property consists substantially all of EPS'
assets, whether tangible or intangible; whether choate or inchoate;
and whether present or future, except as noted in the APA.  There
are no material assets exempted from the foregoing list.

     b) Liabilities: But for notable exceptions, set out below,
none of EPS' debts or obligations will be assumed or undertaken as
part of the Buyer's offer in the APA.

     c) Purchase Price: The purchase price has several specific
components that add, in the aggregate, to the total price being
offered for the Property:

          i. A credit bid of up to the full amount of all
obligations under the DIP Loan and the Convertible Notes owed to
the Buyer (as of the closing of the proposed sale), which, as of
the date of the Motion is equal to the aggregate principal amount
of approximately $14,829,820 (as of the Petition Date), plus
accrued interest, fees and expenses, based on the following: (y)
obligations under the DIP Loan, comprised of principal in the
amount of not less than $2.5 million (as of the date of the
projected closing date) (which amount may be subject to revision
upward depending upon the date of closing), plus accrued interest,
fees and expenses, and (z) obligations owed to the Buyer (as
ultimate assignee of Windecker PA Power, LLC and Alite GmbH) under
the Convertible Notes in the aggregate principal amount of
approximately $12,329,820, plus accrued interest, fees and
expenses;

          ii. Assumption or payment in full of all amounts owed by
the Debtor to FNCB under the FCNB Loans;

          iii. Assumption or payment in full of all amounts owed by
the Debtor to WI Lender under the WI Loan;

          iv. Assumption or payment in full of all amounts owed to
USBEC; and,

          v. Assignment of all executory contracts assumed by the
Buyer, along with payment of all amounts necessary to cure defaults

under such assumed executory contracts, subject to the cure amount
CAP.

     d) The sale will be free and clear of all liens, claims,
interests and encumbrances.

The Debtor proposes to conduct the sale process pursuant to the
procedures and timelines set forth on Exhibit C, which will govern
the sale process relating to the final approval of a sale and a
buyer.   The Bid Procedures have been agreed upon by the Buyer and
EPS.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Nov. 20, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (CST)

     b. Initial Bid: At least equal in value to the purchase price
payable at closing in connection with the Stalking Horse Bid, plus:
(A) the amount of the Break-Up Fee, plus, (B) the amount of the
Expense Reimbursement, plus, (C) an initial overbid of $100,000

     c. Deposit: 10% of the amount of the bid, made payable to the
order of Steinhilber Swanson LLP Special Trust Account

     d. Auction: Qualified Bidders who are deemed to have submitted
a Qualified Bid will convene on Nov. 24, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. (CST)
at the office of SSLLP, or at such other location selected by SSLLP
with written notice to each party that has submitted a Qualified
Bid for the Auction.  The Auction may also be held by Zoom or some
comparable video conferencing platform if the Seller so designates.


     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Nov. 25, 2020

     g. Closing: Dec. 4, 2020

The Debtor believes that conducting a sale process for the Property
according to the proposed timeline will produce a fair and robust
auction and will provide its estate with the best opportunity to
maximize the value of the Property.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y5hy5eak from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.
    
               About Engineered Propulsion Systems

Engineered Propulsion Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of aircraft
engines and engine parts in New Richmond, Wis., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D. Wis. Case No. 20-11957) on July 29, 2020.
Engineered Propulsion president Michael Fuchs signed the petition.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have $100
million to $500 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.

Judge G. Michael Halfenger oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Steinhilber Swanson, LLP as its bankruptcy
counsel; Jarchow Law, LLC as its general corporate counsel; and
Shaun M. Simma, CPA and Simma Flottemesch & Orenstein, Ltd., as
accountants.


EXPRESS GOLD: CCAA Stay Extended Until December 15
--------------------------------------------------
Express Gold Refining Ltd. sought and obtained protection pursuant
to the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act before the Ontario
Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List).  Deloitte
Restructuring Inc. has been appointed as monitor in the Company's
CCAA proceeding pursuant to the Initial Order of the Court dated
Oct. 15, 2020.

The second amended and restated initial order was issued on Oct.
27, 2020, extending the stay of proceedings up to and including
Dec, 15, 2020.

The Monitor can be reached at:

   Deloitte Restructuring Inc.
   Bay Adelaide East
   8 Adelaide Street West, Suite 200
   Toronto, ON   M5H 0A9
   Tel: 1-833-605-1093
   Email: EGR@deloitte.ca

   Phil Reynolds
   Tel: 647-620-2996
   Email: philreynolds@deloitte.ca

   Warren Leung
   Tel: 416-874-4461
   Email: waleung@deloitte.ca

Lawyers for the Monitor:

   Dentons Canada LLP
   77 King Street West, Suite 400
   Toronto-Dominion Centre
   Toronto, ON M5K 0A1

   Robert Kennedy
   Tel: 416-367-6756
   Email: robert.kennedy@dentons.com

   Mark Freake
   Email: mark.freake@dentons.com

Lawyers for Express Gold Refining:

   Goldman Sloan Nash & Haber LLP
   480 University Avenue, Suite 1600
   Toronto, ON M5G 1V2
   Fax: 416-597-3370

   Mario Forte
   Tel: 416-597-6477
   Email: forte@gsnh.com

   Joel Turgeon
   Tel: 416-597-6486
   Email: turgeon@gsnh.com

   Katie Parent
   Tel: 416-597-3375
   Email: parent@gsnh.com

Tax Lawyers for Express Gold Refining:

   Baker & Mackenzie LLP
   181 Bay Street, Suite 2100
   Toronto, ON M5J 2T3

   Bryan Horrigan
   Tel: 416-865-3905
   Email: bryan.horrigan@bakermckenzie.com

Copies of the Initial Order and the Company's application materials
have been posted on the Monitor's website at
http://www.insolvencies.deloitte.ca/en-ca/ExpressGoldRefiningLtd.

Express Gold Refining Ltd. -- https://www.xau.ca/ -- is a fourth
generation operated family business that has become an integral and
seamless partner of many Jewellers, manufacturers, wholesalers,
pawnshops, refiners, precious metal dealers and dental labs in
Ontario and across North America.


EXTRACTECH LLC: Wants Plan Exclusivity Extended Thru Dec. 9
-----------------------------------------------------------
Extractech, LLC, requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada to extend by 90 days the exclusive period during
which the Debtor may file a plan of reorganization and obtain
confirmation of a proposed plan, to and including December 9, 2020.


The Debtor is proceeding diligently in its efforts and needs
further time to continue working in reestablishing its business so
it can become more efficient and for the negotiations with the
creditors. "We need the time to prepare information and formulate
an acceptable plan of reorganization," the Debtor adds.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2SMCdW3 at no extra charge.

                      About Extractech LLC

Extractech, LLC, a biotechnology company in Yerington, Nevada,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Nev. Case No. 20-50496) on May 12, 2020. The petition was signed
by David Neisingh, its manager.  At the time of the filing, Debtor
had estimated assets of between $10 million and $50 million and
liabilities of $1 million and $10 million.  

Judge Bruce T. Beesley oversees the case. The Debtor has tapped the
Law Offices of Alan R. Smith as its bankruptcy counsel and Bruce
Law Group as its litigation counsel.


EXTRACTION OIL: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Thru 2021
--------------------------------------------------------
At the behest of Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. and its affiliates,
Judge Christopher S. Sontchi extended the Debtors' exclusive
periods to file a Chapter 11 plan by 90 days through and including
January 10, 2021, and to solicit acceptances of the plan by 90 days
through and including March 13, 2021.

Fewer than three months from the Petition Date, the Debtors have
made substantial progress towards achieving their restructuring
goals, but significant work remains to be done. The Debtors have
worked collaboratively with their advisors and all relevant
stakeholders to continue pushing forward their marketing process
for a combination transaction.

Specifically, on August 28, 2020, the Debtors received four
proposals for a potential combination transaction. Since then, the
Debtors have been evaluating the proposals and considering
responses and next steps with the deadline to execute definitive
documentation on September 17 pursuant to the merger process
milestones. At the same time, the Debtors have been dual-tracking a
standalone restructuring.

The extension of the exclusivity periods will permit the Debtors to
continue pursuing a value-maximizing combination transaction while
dual-tracking a standalone restructuring in order to bring these
chapter 11 cases to conclusion in an orderly, efficient manner, and
is in the best interests of the Debtors, their estates, and all
stakeholders, as it will allow the Debtors to procure the best
recovery for their creditors.

Before the Debtors' order was granted, the Debtors asked the Court
to extend the exclusive periods to file a plan and solicit
acceptance through and including February 9 and April 12, 2021,
respectively.

Absent the extension, the Debtors' filing exclusivity period will
end on October 12, and the solicitation exclusivity period will
expire on December 11, 2020.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to extend is available from
kccllc.net at https://bit.ly/2FjFR6G at no extra charge.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from kccllc.net
at https://bit.ly/3lAleTl at no extra charge.

                   About Extraction Oil & Gas

Denver-based Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. --
http://www.extractionog.com/-- is an independent energy
exploration and development company focused on exploring,
developing, and producing crude oil, natural gas, and NGLs
primarily in the Wattenberg Field in the Denver-Julesburg Basin of
Colorado.

Extraction Oil & Gas and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
20-11548) on June 14, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors
disclosed $1 billion to $10 billion in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Christopher S. Sontchi oversees the cases. The Debtors tapped
Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Kirkland & Ellis International, LLP and
Whireford, Taylor & Preston, LLC as legal counsel; Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as restructuring advisor; and Moelis & Company
and Petrie Partners Securities, LLC as investment banker and
financial advisor. Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC is the claims
and balloting agent and administrative advisor and
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) is the Debtors' independent audit
services provider.


EZ TRANSPORT: Seeks Approval to Tap Leaberry & Stapleton as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------
EZ Transport LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of West Virginia to employ John F. Leaberry
of the Leaberry Law Firm PLLC and Scott G. Stapleton of the
Stapleton Law Offices LC as co-counsel.

Mr. Leaberry and Mr. Stapleton will render these professional
services to the Debtor:

     (a) Prepare the petition and schedules and statement of
financial affairs;

     (b) File all necessary applications, motions, and other
pleadings regarding matters to be submitted to the Court;

     (c) Advise management of the Debtor regarding the rights,
power and duties of the Debtor;

     (d) Assist management in providing a Plan of Reorganization;

     (e) In the alternative, the Debtor may ask the Court to
supervise the liquidation of the Debtor's property through a sale
process or at an auction; and

     (f) The Debtor may ask the Court to value secured property
under 11 U.S.C. Section 506 and surrender the property to the
secured creditor at a Court determined valuation.

The Debtor has paid the amount of $16,000.00, which includes the
case filing fee of $1,717, to employ both co-counsel.

The Debtor asks the Court to approve payment at the rate of:

     Attorneys' bankruptcy services $350.00 per hour
     Paralegal personnel            $150.00 per hour
     Administrative Assistants       $75.00

John F. Leaberry of the Leaberry Law Firm PLLC and Scott G.
Stapleton of the Stapleton Law Offices LC disclosed in court
filings that neither them nor their firms hold or represent any
interest adverse to the estate of the Debtor, its creditors, or any
other parties-interests under the Bankruptcy Code.

The attorneys can be reached at:
   
     John F. Leaberry, Esq.
     LEABERRY LAW FIRM PLLC
     167 Patrick Street
     Lewisburg, WV 24901
     Telephone: (304) 645-2025
     Facsimile: (888) 469-6631
     
            - and –

     Scott G. Stapleton, Esq.
     STAPLETON LAW OFFICES, LC
     400 Fifth Ave.
     Huntington, WV 25701
     Telephone: (304) 529-1130
     Facsimile: (304) 529-0103
     E-mail: Contact@Stapleton-Law.com

                        About EZ Transport

EZ Transport, LLC filed a voluntary petition for under Chapter 11,
Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W. Va. Case No.
20- 20360) on October 14, 2020. Judge B. McKay Mignault oversees
the case. John F. Leaberry, Esq., of the Leaberry Law Firm PLLC and
Scott G. Stapleton, Esq., of the Stapleton Law Offices LC serve as
the Debtor's co-counsel.


FIC RESTAURANTS: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: FIC Restaurants, Inc.
             1855 Boston Road
             Suite 300
             Wilbraham, MA 01095

Business Description:     The Debtors operate a casual dining
                          restaurant chain in the United States
                          known as Friendly's.  The Debtors have
                          approximately 60 corporate restaurants
                          and serve as franchisor on another
                          approximately 86 locations.  Visit
                          https://www.friendlysrestaurants.com
                          for more information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2020

Court:                    United States Bankruptcy Court
                          District of Delaware

Five affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions seeking
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                         Case No.
     ------                                         --------
     FIC Restaurants, Inc. (Lead Case)              20-12807
     Neapolitan Group Holdings, LLC                 20-12805
     FIC Holdings, LLC                              20-12806
     Friendly's Restaurants, LLC                    20-12808
     Friendly's Franchising, LLC                    20-12809

Judge:                    Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi

Debtors'
Bankruptcy
Counsel:                  Matthew P. Ward, Esq.
                          Ericka F. Johnson, Esq.
                          Morgan L. Patterson, Esq.
                          Nicolas T. Verna, Esq.
                          WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP
                          1313 North Market Street, Suite 1200
                          Wilmington, Delaware 19801
                          Tel: (302) 252-4320
                               (302) 252-4338
                          Fax: (302) 252-4330
                          Email: matthew.ward@wbd-us.com
                          Email: ericka.johnson@wbd-us.com
                          Email: morgan.patterson@wbd-us.com
                          Email: nick.verna@wbd-us.com

Debtors'
Mergers and
Acquisition
Advisor:                  DUFF & PHELPS SECURITIES, LLC

Debtors'
Financial
Consultants &
Advisors;                 CARL MARKS ADVISORY GROUP LLC

Debtors'
Claims,
Noticing,
Solicitation Agent
and Administrative
Advisor:                  DONLIN, RECANO & COMPANY, INC.
https://www.donlinrecano.com/Clients/ViewDocument?dataDir=fr&casen=20-12807&docketn=17

FIC Restaurants'
Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

FIC Restaurants'
Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petitions were signed by T. Todd Schwendenmann, chief financial
officer, treasurer, secretary.

A copy of FIC Restaurants' petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/2ZVCLDQ/FIC_Restaurants_Inc__debke-20-12807__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. US Foods Inc.                    Trade Accounts        $502,719
9399 W Higgins Rd                      Payable
Ste 500
Rosemont IL 60018
Brad K Fisher -
VP National Sales & Service
Tel: (847) 720-2476
Email: brad.fisher@usfoods.com

2. Engie Insight Services Inc.      Trade Accounts        $228,710
1313 N Atlantic St                      Payable
Ste 5000
Spokane WA 99201-2330
Tim Clark - Client Service Director
Tel: (207) 242-3360
Email: clark@engie.com

3. SMS Assist LLC                   Trade Accounts         $32,137
28389 Network PL                        Payable
Chicago, IL 60673-1283
Tel: (312) 698-7000
Email: accounting@smsassist.com

4. Levin Management                 Trade Accounts         $11,375
Corporation                             Payable
PO Box 326
Plainfield NJ 07061-0326
John Vessie
Tel: (800) 488-0768 ext. 277
Email: jvessie@levinmgt.com

5. Quality Retail System Inc.       Trade Accounts          $6,056
1531 NY RT 67                           Payable
Schaghticoke NY 12154
Tel: (518) 753-4500

6. Urban Edge Properties LP         Trade Accounts          $4,789
210 Route 4 East                        Payable
Paramus NJ 07652
Andrea L. Alexander -
Associate General Counsel
Tel: (201) 571 3597
Email: alexander@uedge.com

7. Milelli Morris Plains LLC        Trade Accounts          $3,302
51 Harter Rd                            Payable
Morristown NJ 07690
Joseph Milelli Jr. - Manager
Tel: (973) 539-4340

8. St. John Neumann Church          Trade Accounts          $2,700
708 Milford Rd 101A                     Payable
Merrimack NH 03054
Father Christopher Martel
Tel: (603) 880-4689
Email: office@sjnnh.org

9. Discover Financial Services       Trade Accounts         $2,400
2500 Lake Cook Road                     Payable
Riverwoods IL 60015
Wanji Walcott - VP and
General Counsel

10. Wind River                       Trade Accounts         $2,245
Environmental LLC                        Payable
PO Box 22074
New York NY 10087-2074

11. Ganesh Hospitality LLC           Trade Accounts         $1,331
Econo Lodge                              Payable
251 Greenmanville Ave
Mystic CT 06355

12. Iron Mountain Records            Trade Accounts         $1,265
PO Box 27128                             Payable
New York NY 10087-7128
Greer Aviv, SVP
Tel: (617) 535-2887
Email: Greer.Aviv@ironmountain.com

13. The ADT Security Corporation      Trade Accounts        $1,170
PO Box 872987                            Payable
Kansas City MO 64187-2987
Jeff Likosar, Chief Financial Officer

14. Abdelmajid Slassi                   Unclaimed           $1,147
Email: aslassi@hotmail.com               Payroll

15. Myrtle Beach Farms                Trade Accounts        $1,045
Company Inc                              Payable
PO Box 7277
Myrtle Beach SC 29572
Tel: (843) 448-5123

16. Cory Fairfield                      Unclaimed             $996
                                         Payroll

17. Matthew Doxsey                      Unclaimed             $912
                                         Payroll

18. Christopher Little                  Unclaimed             $904
Email: cjlittle@gholycross.edu           Payroll

19. Peruse Software Inc              Trade Accounts           $882
436 Amherst St Ste 222                   Payable
Nashua NH 03063
Tel:(603) 626-0016

20. Robert Strachko                  Trade Accounts           $846
                                         Payable

21. Nicole Whiting                      Unclaimed             $816
                                         Payroll

22. Jarrad A Burns                      Unclaimed             $808
                                         Payroll

23. Brandon Mourer                      Unclaimed             $779
                                         Payroll

24. Adam Brady                          Unclaimed             $759
                                         Payroll

25. Andrew Hartnett                     Unclaimed             $746
                                         Payroll

26. Joseph Otto                         Unclaimed             $692
                                         Payroll

27. Dennis Williams                     Unclaimed             $683
Email: dwill7282@gmail.com               Payroll

28. Kristen Young                       Unclaimed             $667
                                         Payroll

29. Trenten Torres                      Unclaimed             $664
                                         Payroll

30. Zachary Bernstein                   Unclaimed             $660
                                         Payroll


FISKER AUTOMOTIVE: Settles $1.88M WARN Suit With Class Workers
--------------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that bankrupt electric car company Fisker Automotive
has reached a $1.88 million settlement with a class of workers who
claimed they were laid off without warning in violation of federal
law.

Fisker and the workers asked a Delaware bankruptcy court Sept. 9,
2020, for preliminary approval of the Worker Adjustment and
Retraining Notification Act settlement, which would provide about
$10,000 to each class member. The class covers a "cross-section" of
159 former employees ranging from engineers to marketers and
administrative workers, according to their attorney, Jack Raisner
of Raisner Roupinian LLP.

                      About Fisker Automotive

Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc., developer of the Karma plug-in
hybrid electric sedan, filed a petition for Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 13-13087) on Nov. 22, 2013.

Fisker estimated assets of more than $100 million and listed debt
of $500 million in its bankruptcy petition. The assets include an
assembly plant purchased for $21 million from General Motors Corp.
The plant never operated.  The cars were assembled in Finland.

Fisker received a $529 million loan from the Department of Energy's
Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program and drew
down about $192 million before the department froze the loan after
Fisker failed to hit several development targets. The company
defaulted on its loan in April 2013.

Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross presides over the case.  

The Debtors have tapped James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C., Esq., Anup
Sathy, P.C., Esq., and Ryan Preston Dahl, Esq., at Kirkland & Ellis
LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, as co-counsel; Laura Davis Jones, Esq.,
James E. O'Neill, Esq., and Peter J. Keane, Esq., at Pachulski
Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in Wilmington, Delaware, as co-counsel;
Beilinson Advisory Group as restructuring advisors; and Rust
Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, as notice and claims agent and
administrative advisor.

On Nov. 5, 2013, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors was
appointed. The members are: (a) David M. Cohen; (b) Sven
Etzelsberger; (c) Kuster Automotive Door Systems GmbH; (d) Magna
E-Car USA, LLC; (e) Supercars & More SRL; and (f) TK Holdings Inc.
The Committee is represented by William R. Baldiga, Esq., and Sunni
P. Beville, Esq., at Brown Rudnick LLP; and Mark Minuti,
Esq., at Saul Ewing LLP. Emerald Capital Advisors Corp. is the
financial advisors for the Committee.

Fisker sought bankruptcy protection to pursue a private sale of its
business to Hybrid Tech Holdings, LLC. The Committee, however,
wants a sale public sale, and has identified Wanxiang America
Corporation as stalking horse bidder.

Hybrid was initially under contract to buy Fisker in exchange for
$75 million of the $168.5 million government loan it acquired
immediately before the Debtor's Chapter 11 filing.  Hybrid later
raised its offer by adding an additional $1 million cash and
agreeing to share proceeds from the sale of a facility in Delaware
it doesn't intend to operate. Hybrid also offered to pay real
estate taxes on the Delaware plant.  Hybrid also will waive $90
million in deficiency claims that otherwise would dilute unsecured
creditors' recovery.

Wanxiang, as stalking horse bidder, initially offered $25.8 million
in cash. However, Wanxiang has said it has raised its offer by $10
million and is willing to go higher.

After the hearings on Jan. 10 and 13, the Court directed a public
auction, and capped Hybrid's credit bid to $25 million.

In response, Hybrid raised its offer to $55 million.

Hybrid is represented by Tobias Keller, Esq., and Peter Benvenutti,
Esq., at Keller & Benvenutti LLP, in San Francisco, California.

Wanxiang, which bought A123 Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of
lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles such as the Fisker
Karma, in a bankruptcy auction early in 2013 for $256.6 million, is
represented in Fisker's case by Sidley Austin LLP's Bojan Guzina,
Esq., and Andrew F. O'Neill, Esq.; and Young Conaway Stargatt &
Taylor, LLP's Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Robert S. Brady, Esq., and
Kenneth J. Enos, Esq.

On Feb. 19, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court approved the sale of
Fisker's assets to Wanxiang America Corporation. The sale closed on
March 24, 2014. The sale to Wanxiang is valued at approximately
$150 million, Fisker said in a news statement.

On March 27, 2014, the Court authorized Fisker Automotive Holdings
to change its name to FAH Liquidating Corp. and its affiliate,
Fisker Automotive Inc., to FA Liquidating Corp., following the
sale.

FA Liquidating Corp. f/k/a Fisker Automotive, Inc., and FAH
Liquidating Corp. fka Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc., notified
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware that their
Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation became effective as
of Aug. 13, 2014.


FIZZ & BUBBLE: Drops Plan, To Accept $400K Cash From Decathlon
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor-in-Possession, Fizz & Bubble, LLC, on Oct. 30, 2020
submitted a  status report in connection with the pending Plan and
Disclosure Statement.  In light of a significant change in the
Debtor's circumstances, the Debtor does not intend to seek approval
or amendment of its Disclosure Statement and Plan and will be
seeking to complete a stand-alone sale of substantially all of its
assets in exchange for a credit bid and cash with Decathlon Alpha
III, L.P..

The Status Report is intended to alert the Court of the nature of
the change in circumstances and the steps the Debtor proposes to
take to prepare and conduct the asset sale. Debtor's proposed
Reorganization Plan was premised on certain fundamentals.  One of
those fundamental points was the Debtor and its professionals had
engaged in a process to obtain new investment for the Debtor's
business as a means to facilitate a capital infusion to stabilize
operations and to fund payment to the Debtor's Creditors.  New
investment would be made in a newly formed corporation, the
Acquiring Entity, which would then issue securities pursuant to the
Plan on account of the cash from new investors and in exchange for
certain Claims.  The Acquiring Entity, once formed and capitalized,
would then enter into an asset purchase agreement with the Debtor
to acquire the Assets of the Debtor and the bankruptcy estate. The
Debtor would then seek Court approval for the sale of the Assets,
free and clear of all liens, claims, and interests, which would be
noticed to all creditors and include disclosure of the primary
terms of the acquisition (purchase price, closing conditions, and
any Assets excluded from the purchase). An accompanying disclosure
would also include detailed information on the Acquiring Entity.

Given the amount of Decathlon's claims in this case, the Plan was
almost wholly reliant on a number of concessions from Decathlon to
make the Plan feasible.  Once the sale of the Assets was completed,
the Debtor would utilize the sale proceeds to make payments to
Creditors as outlined in the Plan.  The Plan contemplated that the
Acquiring Entity would assume the responsibility for payment over
time of certain priority tax obligations that would not be
satisfied from the sale proceeds.  After the Reorganization Plan
was filed, the Debtor continued its marketing effort to secure an
investor willing to provide the funding for the Acquiring Entity.
While Debtor did secure a term sheet from an investor willing to
fund the Acquiring Entity, said investor was not willing to devote
any of its investment towards the payment of any amounts towards
the acquisition of assets and funding the Debtor's Plan. Instead,
it expected Decathlon to provide yet further funding into the case
to facilitate the asset sale.  Based on the amount of its
pre-petition secured claim, its post-petition secured claim, and
its superpriority administrative expense claim, Decathlon informed
the Debtor that it would not fund the amount needed to meet the
obligations under the Plan.  Instead, Decathlon was willing to
credit bid against its secured claim, subordinate its superpriority
claim, and offer a less substantial cash payment to facilitate a
partial payment to administrative claimants in the case.

After negotiations with Decathlon, and consultations with
administrative claimants and counsel for the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors, the Debtor reached an agreement in principle
to sell substantially all of the assets of the estate to Decathlon
in exchange for a credit bid and a $400,000 cash payment.  While
the $400,000 payment will provide a meaningful distribution to
administrative claimants, it is inadequate to meet the funding
requirements of the Plan. Moreover, after the asset sale is
complete, the Debtor does not believe that there are sufficient
remaining assets, including claims held by the estate, to fund a
reorganization of any structure.  The Debtor has attempted to
secure another line of post-petition financing and investment in
order to fund the Plan.  However, those efforts have not produced
an alternative funding source, and a reorganization of the Debtor
is not otherwise possible.

The Debtor intends to file a notice of the sale and motion for
authority to sell substantially of its assets free and clear of
liens, claims, and interest within the next seven days (from Oct.
30).  The Debtor intends to maintain its operations through the
closing of the sale. After closing, Debtor plans to seek authority
for distribution of the sale proceeds to administrative claimants
and submitting a further report on the remaining assets and claims,
along with its determination of whether conversion of the case to
chapter 7 of dismissal is in the best interests of creditors and
the estate.

Debtor's counsel:

     Douglas R. Ricks, OSB 044026
     VANDEN BOS & CHAPMAN, LLP
     319 SW Washington St., Ste. 520
     Portland, OR 97204
     Telephone: 503-241-4869
     Fax: 503-241-3731

                       About Fizz & Bubble

Fizz & Bubble, LLC -- https://fizzandbubble.com/ -- is a toiletries
wholesaler based in Wilsonville, Oregon offering an array of
luxurious bath and shower treats. The company's products include
bath fizzies, bubble bath cupcakes, bubble bath elixirs, bath
truffles, bath melts, shower steamers, body scrubs, whipped soaps,
body frosting lotions, face mask frostings, and lip scrubs.

Fizz & Bubble filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Ore. Case No. 19-34092) on Nov. 4, 2019. In the petition signed by
Kimberly Ann Mitchell, sole member and chief creative officer, the
Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities. The Hon. Trish M. Brown oversees the case.
The Debtor is represented by Douglas R. Ricks, Esq., at Vanden Bos
& Chapman, LLP.


GASTON ENTERPRISES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Gaston Enterprises, LLC
        23630 N. 35th Drive, Suite 1
        Glendale, AZ 85310

Business Description: Gaston Enterprises, LLC is engaged in
                      activities related to real estate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona

Case No.: 20-12056

Judge: Hon. Brenda K. Martin

Debtor's Counsel: Randy Nussbaum, Esq.
                  SACKS TIERNEY P.A.
                  4250 N Drinkwater Blvd.
                  4th Floor
                  Scottsdale, AZ 85251-3693
                  Tel: 480-425-2600
                  Email: Randy. Nussbaum@SacksTierney.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Samuel M. Gaston, managing member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/WVKAJPA/GASTON_ENTERPRISES_LLC__azbke-20-12056__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


GORDON JENSEN: Sale of $8.7M Knollwood Facility to Fund Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Jensen Health Care Association, Inc., filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta
Division, a Plan of Liquidation and a Disclosure Statement on
August 28, 2020.

The only remaining asset of the estate is the Knollwood facility
which the Debtor valued in its schedules at a total of $8,700,000.
The Plan provides for liquidation of the Debtor's Knollwood Nursing
Center facility located at 3145-A Knollwood Drive Mobile, AL
36693.

Class 1 BOKF will be paid 100% from the proceeds of the Section 363
sale of Knollwood after customary closing costs and expenses.

Class 2 General Unsecured Claims totaling $3,051,257 will receive
distributions equal to each holder's pro-rata portion of the
proceeds from the sale of Knollwood after BOKF and all priority
claimants have been paid in full.

Upon the Confirmation Order becoming a final order, the Debtor will
market and sell Knollwood for the best price available.  Upon a
sale event, the Debtor will pay or segregate sufficient funds to
pay (i) all reasonable and ordinary costs of sale, including broker
commissions, (ii) all outstanding property taxes not otherwise
prorated between the Debtor and the purchaser at closing, (iii) the
Class 1 Claim of BOKF, (iv) any unpaid professional fee claims,
including post-confirmation professional fee claims, (v) the
balance owed the holders of priority tax claims, and (vi) the Class
2 Distribution.

In the event that no agreement for the purchase of Knollwood is
filed with the Court for approval within one year year following
the Final Order Date, the Debtor will seek authorization from the
Court to employ an auctioneer and arrange for Knollwood to be
auctioned to the highest bidder in a reasonable period of time
based upon the auctioneer’s recommendations for realizing the
highest value for Knollwood.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement and Liquidating Plan
dated August 28, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y67kafj3
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

            THEODORE N. STAPLETON, PC
            Theodore N. Stapleton
            Suite 100-B
            2802 Paces Ferry Road
            Atlanta, Georgia, 30339
            Telephone: (770) 436-3334
            E-mail: tstaple@tstaple.com

                   About Bama Oaks Retirement

Bama Oaks Retirement, LLC, d/b/a Gordon Oaks Assisted Living, owns
and operates an assisted living facility in Mobile, Alabama.  The
company filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No.
20-61914) on Feb. 1, 2020.  In the petition  signed by Christopher
F. Brogdon, manager, the Debtor was estimated to have between $10
million and $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  Theodore
N. Stapleton, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


GORDON JENSEN: Secured Creditor Objects to Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor BOKF, N.A. objects to the Disclosure Statement filed by
debtor Gordon Jensen Health Care Association, Inc. as follows:

   * The Disclosure Statement, at part II(I), states the Knollwood
Facility has a liquidation value of $8,700,000.  The Disclosure
Statement also states BOKF's claim is $9,188,519.

   * These values are incorrect.  BOKF has recently had an
appraisal performed on the Knollwood Facility showing the property
to have an as-is value of $4,300,000. The total amount Debtor owed
to BOKF was $9,700,003 as of Sept. 30, 2020.

   * BOKF filed a Motion to Dismiss, for Relief from Stay, or to
Appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee before filing this Objection which
should be heard and resolved before the estate incurs expenses
related to the solicitation of Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan.

A full-text copy of BOKF's objection to the Disclosure Statement
dated October 2, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yye7oarl
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for BOKF:

         Walter E. Jones
         Patrick Silloway
         BALCH & BINGHAM LLP
         30 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard, N.W., Suite 700
         Atlanta, GA 30308
         Telephone: (404) 261-6020
         Facsimile: (404) 261-3656
         E-mail: wjones@balch.com
                 psilloway@balch.com

                    About Gordon Jensen Health
                    Care Association Inc.

Gordon Jensen Health Care Association, Inc. is a tax-exempt,
nonprofit corporation whose mission is to provide elderly nursing
care and housing.

Gordon Jensen Health Care Association, Inc., based in Atlanta, GA,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 20-61915) on
Feb. 1, 2020.  In the petition signed by Scott Hardin, president,
the Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  Theodore N.
Stapleton, Esq., at Theodore N. Stapleton P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


GORDON JENSEN: U.S. Trustee Objects to Plan & Disclosures
---------------------------------------------------------
Nancy J. Gargula, United States Trustee for Region 21, objects to
final approval of the Disclosure Statement for Gordon Jensen Health
Care Association, Inc., and confirmation of the Plan of
Liquidation.

The United States Trustee points out that:

   * the Disclosure Statement lacks information regarding key
relationships.

   * the Disclosure Statement lacks sufficient information
regarding debtor's assets and liabilities.

   * the Disclosure Statement fails to address pending causes of
action.

   * the Disclosure Statement provides vague financial information
relevant to the creditors' decision to accept or reject the Chapter
11 Plan.

The U.S. Trustee also raised objections to the Chapter 11 Plan.
The U.S. Trustee objects to the confirmation of the Plan on the
grounds that (i) the Plan appears to violate Section 1129(a)(5)(B)
because it fails to include compensation details for the Debtor's
post-confirmation manager who is an insider, (ii) the Plan may not
be feasible.

According to the United States Trustee, the results of the sale or
auction of the Knollwood facility are necessary to determine the
feasibility of the Plan.  The U.S. Trustee points out that since
the distribution to the unsecured creditors contemplated for Class
2 is unclear the feasibility of such distributions cannot be
determined.

The United States Trustee further points out that the Plan fails to
indicate the Debtor's requirement to file post-confirmation reports
indicating payments under the Plan and in its ongoing operations
utilizing forms approved by the UST pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec.
1106(a)(7) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2015(a)(5).

                     About Gordon Jensen Health
                       Care Association Inc.

Gordon Jensen Health Care Association, Inc. is a tax-exempt,
nonprofit corporation whose mission is to provide elderly nursing
care and housing.

Gordon Jensen Health Care Association, Inc., based in Atlanta, GA,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 20-61915) on
Feb. 1, 2020. In the petition signed by Scott Hardin, president,
the Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  Theodore N.
Stapleton, Esq., at Theodore N. Stapleton P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


GROUND OPTIONS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ground Options LLC
        7325 Janes Avenue
        Woodridge, IL 60517

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 3, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois

Case No.: 20-19706

Judge: Hon. Carol A. Doyle

Debtor's Counsel: David K. Welch, Esq.
                  BURKE, WARREN, MACKAY & SERRITELLA, P.C.
                  330 N. Wabash
                  21st Floor
                  Chicago, IL 60611
                  Tel: 312-840-7122
                  Email: dwelch@burkelaw.com

Estimated Assets: $50,000 to $100,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by William Maulsby, CEO & managing
partner.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free  at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/MK5WKVI/Ground_Options_LLC__ilnbke-20-19706__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


GRUPO MARITIMO: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
Grupo Maritimo Royal, LLC, according to court dockets.
    
                    About Grupo Maritimo Royal
  
Grupo Maritimo Royal, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-20474) on Sept.
28, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets
of between $500,001 and $1 million and liabilities of the same
range.  Judge A. Jay Cristol oversees the case.  Florida Bankruptcy
Group, LLC serves as Debtor's legal counsel.


HAWAII MOTORSPORTS: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until November 11
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Honorable Benjamin P. Hursh of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Montana has extended Hawaii Motorsports LLC's
exclusive periods to file a Chapter 11 plan and obtain the plan's
confirmation until November 11, 2020.

At a hearing on the Debtor's Amended Disclosure Statement on
September 4, the Court vacated the September 23 confirmation
hearing date and reset it for November 6 to allow the Debtor and
certain secured and unsecured creditors to engage in meditation.

Extending the Debtor's exclusivity periods for confirmation of a
plan is appropriate given the current schedule for the confirmation
hearing.

On August 24, 2020, creditor 150 Dairy Road, LLC, objected to the
Disclosure Statement explaining the Debtor's Plan, arguing that the
Disclosure Statement as proposed fails to provide adequate
information as required by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1125.

Attorneys for 150 Dairy Road:

         Charles W. Hingle
         HOLLAND & HART LLP
         401 North 31st Street, Suite 1500
         P.O. Box 639
         Billings, MT 59103-0639
         Tel: (406) 252-2166
         Fax: (406) 252-1669
         E-mail: chingle@hollandhart.com

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/30ZY29g at no extra charge.  

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/34VPl10 at no extra charge.

                     About Hawaii Motorsports

Hawaii Motorsports LLC, a Montana limited liability company, is a
motorcycle dealer in Kahului, Hawaii.

Hawaii Motorsports LLC, based in Kahului, Hawaii, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. D. Mont. Case No. 20-10006) on Jan. 22, 2020.
In the petition signed by Barry Usher, manager, the Debtor was
estimated to have $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $1 million
to $10 million in liabilities.  

The Honorable Benjamin P. Hursh is the presiding judge.  James A.
Patten, Esq., at Patten Peterman Bekkedahl & Green, PLLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.



HELEN E.A. TUDOR: You-You Ma Buying New York Property for $645K
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Chapman House Museum, Inc., an affiliate of Helen E.A. Tudor,
asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida
to authorize the sale of its real property located at 110 East 57th
Street, Unit 5C, New York, New York to You-You Ma for $645,000.

The Debtor owns the Property.  It owned is owned by the way of 410
shares of a cooperative housing corporation named The 57th Street
Dorchester, Inc.  The Real Property constitutes the Debtor's
primary asset.  Through the sale of the Real Property, the Debtor
will be able to pay all creditors in full via a Plan of
Liquidation.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Real Property to the Buyer for
$645,000.  An initial deposit in the amount of $64,500 has been
placed in escrow as required by the contract.  The sale as
described, after taxes and closing costs, will net sufficient funds
to the estate to pay all allowed claims.  The offer by Buyer is the
highest viable offer presented to the estate at this time, and one
which the Debtor believes is fair.  The proposed closing date is as
soon as practicable after Court Approval.

All fees, closing costs, settlement costs, and taxes including
county taxes, recording, transfer, and tax stamps will be paid at
closing or as otherwise set forth in the Contract.  The Debtor and
Related Debtor Helen E.A. Tudor also believe the sale will net
sufficient funds to pay the remaining creditors of Helen E.A. Tudor
in full.  It is proposing that the net proceeds at closing be paid
to Bruner Wright, P.A.'s Trust Account pending further Order(s) of
the Court upon consummation of the sale.

The Debtor does not believe there are any secured claims against
the Real Property by claimants in the bankruptcy case because they
have been resolved via settlements entered into with creditors and
payments made from the sale proceeds of the real property owned by
Related Debtor The Chapman House Museum, Inc.  However, there are
post-petition maintenance fees owed to the cooperative that are
secured by the Real Property.

The Debtor, in the exercise of its business judgment, has concluded
that the sale as described, presents the best option for maximizing
the value of the assets involved for the benefit of the Debtor's
estate and the creditors.  

Additionally, the Debtor asks that any order granting the Motion
provide that the stay period under Rule 6004(h) and 6006(d), and
any other applicable stay periods, be waived, such that the stay
requirement of Rule 6004(h) is lifted immediately upon the
execution of the Order.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yxfdpoyq from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Helen E.A. Tudor sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Fla.
Case No. 20-40068) on Feb. 19, 2020.  The Debtors tapped Byron
Wright, Esq., at Bruner Wright, P.A., as counsel.


HERTZ GLOBAL: Offers Free Rental for Election Day
-------------------------------------------------
Theresa Braine of NY Daily News reports that car rental company
Hertz may be in Chapter 11 proceedings, but it's not morally
bankrupt.  The rental car company is offering one day free for
those who reserve two-day rental for pickup on Nov. 2 or 3, 2020
from participating locations.

"We want to make it easier for people to exercise their right to
vote – especially those who need safe and reliable
transportation," said Laura Smith, Hertz Executive Vice President
of Global Marketing and Customer Experience, in a statement that
acknowledged the difficulties posed by voting during a pandemic.
"We're happy to provide local and convenient mobility options to
the communities we serve on Election Day."

Thousands of Hertz neighborhood locations around the country are
participating, the company said, and customer can avail themselves
of the deal with a special code.

The program is called Drive the Vote, CNN reported, adding that
Hertz has also provided other support to communities during the
pandemic, such as providing month of free car rentals to 2,000 New
York City health care workers.

Such outreach may seem small but can make a major difference, as
Travel & Leisure noted.  A poll after the 2018 midterm elections
found that 30% of young, registered voters didn't make it because
they had no transportation.

Other companies are offering voter incentives as well, Travel &
Leisure reported. For instance Uber will discount rides and deliver
food for voters. Food service company Sodexo is supplying masks and
supporting voting in several cities as well, Forbes reported.

"Our goal is to try and make the process a bit easier," Sarosh
Mistry, chair of Sodexo North America, told Forbes. "We're doing it
in the ways that we know how and encourage everyone to do their
part and make their voices heard in this election."

                 About Hertz Global Holdings

Hertz Corp. and its subsidiaries -- http://www.hertz.com/--
operate a worldwide vehicle rental business under the Hertz,
Dollar, and Thrifty brands, with car rental locations in North
America, Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia, Australia, the
Caribbean, the Middle East, and New Zealand. The Company also
operates a vehicle leasing and fleet management solutions
business.

On May 22, 2020, The Hertz Corporation and certain of its U.S. and
Canadian subsidiaries and affiliates filed voluntary petitions for
reorganization under Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-11218).

The Hon. Mary F. Walrath is the presiding judge.

White & Case LLP is serving as legal advisor, Moelis & Co. is
serving as investment banker, and FTI Consulting is serving as
financial advisor. Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., is the local
counsel.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent, maintaining the page
https://restructuring.primeclerk.com/hertz


HILLMAN GROUP: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed The Hillman Group Inc.'s ratings
including the company's Corporate Family Rating at B3, Probability
of Default Rating at B3-PD, first lien term loan rating at B2, and
senior unsecured notes at Caa2. At the same time Moody's change the
outlook to stable from negative, and the company's Speculative
Grade Liquidity to SGL-2 from SGL-3.

"The ratings and outlook actions reflect Hillman's strong operating
performance year-to-date, resulting in meaningful improvement in
financial leverage and free cash flow generation," said Oliver
Alcantara, Moody's lead analyst for the company. "The company's
revenue and earnings will remain stable next year following a
strong fiscal 2020, benefiting from continued good consumer demand
for the company's products and from sequential recovery in its
Consumer Connected Solutions business, which will support credit
metrics remaining at around current levels," added Alcantara.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Hillman Group Inc. (The)

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Caa2 (LGD5)

Upgrades:

Issuer: Hillman Group Inc. (The)

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Hillman Group Inc. (The)

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Hillman's B3 CFR broadly reflects its credit profile including its
high financial leverage with debt/EBITDA at around 7.0x for the
twelve months period ended September 26, 2020, as well as material
interest burden and growth capital expenditures that pressure free
cash flow generation. Hillman has customer concentration with its
top 3 customers representing around 58% of revenue. The company's
Consumer Connected Solutions (CCS) business has been negatively
impacted by reduced traffic and restricted access to key
duplicating kiosks due to social distancing measures. Moody's
expects CCS segment demand will sequentially improve for the
balance of 2020, and continue into 2021, as retail partners reopen
store aisles or move installed machines, but will remain below
prior year levels as its full-service solutions continue to have
lower traffic. Governance factors include Hillman's aggressive
financial policies under private equity ownership, including its
very high leverage and aggressive growth through acquisitions
strategy. The approaching maturity of the company's $330 million
senior notes due July 2022 poses refinancing risks; however, this
is somewhat mitigated by the company's significant improvement in
leverage and free cash flow generation.

The rating also reflects the relatively stable demand for Hillman's
products as a result of their replenishment nature and low-price
points, resulting in modest exposure to cyclical downturns. The
company has long-standing relationships with well-recognized
retailers, good geographic diversification within the US and
Canada, and a track record of successfully integrating
acquisitions. Hillman benefits from some product diversification,
and strong consumer demand for the company's construction fasteners
and personal protection equipment products year-to-date has more
than offset weakness in its key duplicating business. The company's
good liquidity reflects Moody's expectations for positive free cash
flows over the next 12-18 months of around $60 million, and access
to its $250 revolving facility due 2024. Hillman's free cash flows
will benefit from continued positive operating results and from
lower cash charges related to restructuring and acquisition
integration initiatives. In addition, the company has good
flexibility under its ABL financial maintenance covenant and no
financial maintenance covenants in the term loans.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations for solid demand
for the company's products over the next 12-18 months that should
support credit metrics remaining around current levels and positive
free cash flows on an annual basis. The stable outlook also
reflects Moody's expectation that the company will address the
upcoming maturity of its $330 million senior notes due July 2022
before the notes become current.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company consistently reports
meaningful positive free cash flows benefitting from organic
revenue growth and EBITDA margin expansion. If debt/EBITDA is
sustained below 5.5x, EBITA/interest coverage above 2.0x, free cash
flow/debt sustained over 5%. A ratings upgrade would also require
the company maintaining balanced financial policies that support
credit metrics at the above levels.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company's operating results
deteriorate, highlighted by weakness in operating margins, negative
free cash flow on a sustained basis as well as debt/EBITDA
sustained above 7.5x, or EBITA/interest is below 1.0x. Ratings
could also be downgraded if liquidity deteriorates or the company
fails to maintain strong cash flow generation such that it provides
sufficient cushion to absorb potentially higher cost of capital as
it seeks to refinance its 2022 debt maturity.

The Hillman Group Inc. headquartered in Cincinnati, OH, is a
product and services provider in the hardware and home improvement
industry. The company sells hardware including fasteners, rods,
keys, tags and signs to retailers in the United States, Canada,
Mexico, Latin America, and the Caribbean, and provides related
services, including installing and maintaining key duplication and
engraving machines. As of June 2014, Hillman is majority-owned by
CCMP Capital Advisors with Oak Hill Capital Partners holding a
minority interest ownership of approximately 17%. For the last
twelve months ended June 27, 2020, the company generated
approximately $1.3 billion in revenues.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Consumer
Durables Industry published in April 2017.


ICHARD C. ANGINO: Proposes a Cordier Auction of Personal Property
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Richard C. Angino and Alice K. Angino ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to authorize the auction
sale of various personal property, including furniture, clothing
and other such items, located at their residence in Dauphin County,
Pennsylvania.

The Debtors own the Personal Property.  They have been attempting
to sell their residence.  They have also entered into a Stipulation
with the holder of the first mortgage lien on the residence, Wells
Fargo Bank, as to the sale of the residence and relief from the
stay.

As a result, the Debtors are planning a move as to their residence
by the end of 2020.  Following their move, the Debtors will no
longer need all of the various Personal Property.

The Debtors' Schedules filed in the case set forth the value of all
of their Personal Property as approximately $13,700.  They propose
to sell some, but not all, of the Personal Property.  In order to
sell the Personal Property, the Debtors have engaged the services
of Cordier Auctions and Appraisals.  They have filed an Application
to Approve Cordier Auctions and Appraisals as the auctioneer of the
Debtors' Personal Property.

The Debtors believe that a sale by auction represents the best
method in which to recover the maximum amount from the sale of the
Personal Property.  There are no liens on the Personal Property.
The Debtors ask that the Personal Property be sold free and clear
of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and other interests, including
but not limited to any liens and encumbrances.  All liens, claims,
encumbrances and other interests against the Personal Property, if
any, will transfer and affix to the sale proceeds.

The auctioneer for the Debtors intends to advertise auction sales.
Some items will be sold at various times by the auctioneer.  
Ultimately, it is anticipated that an auction at the Debtors'
residence will also be held by early January 2021.  Subsequent to
the auction, the Debtors will file a Notice on the docket of their
case as to the results of the auction.  

The Debtors propose to pay the costs and expenses associated with
the sale of the Personal Property following the auction, as
follows:  A 25% commission to Cordier, plus advertising costs of no
more than $800 and costs to assemble the Personal Property of no
more than $2,500.  Subsequent to the payment of costs of sale, the
Debtors propose to utilize the net proceeds of the sale of the
Personal Property to pay administrative expenses, including charges
of professionals.

The Debtors' decision to sell the Personal Property is an exercise
of reasonable business judgment.

Because over time the Personal Property may decrease in value, the
Debtors ask that any order approving the sale transaction be
effective immediately by declaring inapplicable the 14-day stay
provided in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).

Richard C. Angino and Alice K. Angino sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 20-00031) on Jan. 6, 2020.  The Debtors
tapped Robert Chernicoff, Esq., as counsel.


INTERRA INNOVATION: Disclosure Statement Approved
-------------------------------------------------
Following a hearing on Oct. 20, 2020, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Massachusetts entered an order approving InTerra
Innovation, Inc.'s Disclosure Statement and
setting a Dec. 1, 2020, at 11:30 a.m. hearing to consider
confirmation of the Plan.

Objections to confirmation are due Nov. 25, 2020 at 4:30 p.m..
Ballots are also due Nov. 25, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. ET.

Only holders of Claims in 2, 3, and 4 will be entitled to vote on
the Plan.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement Order is available at

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/3LXCKBA/InTerra_Innovation_Inc__mabke-19-13469__0344.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

                      About inTerra Innovation

InTerra Innovation, Inc. -- http://www.interra-innovation.com/--
is a specialty construction materials company focused on providing
innovative solutions for the design, manufacture, delivery and
installation of products for the construction industry throughout
the United States. It offers mobile mixing, specialty grouting,
thermal grouting, lightweight cellular concrete, and concrete and
specialty pumping.

InTerra sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-13469) on Oct. 11, 2019. In the
petition signed by Frederick P. Hooper, president, the Debtor was
estimated to have assets ranging between $1 million to $10 million
and debts of the same range.  The Hon. Frank J. Bailey is the case
judge. InTerra tapped Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's counsel. CRS Capstone Partners, LLC, is the investment
banker.


INTERRA INNOVATION: Unsecureds to Recover At Least 40% in Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Interra Innovation, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Massachusetts, Eastern Division, a Disclosure
Statement with respect to Plan of Reorganization dated September 1,
2020.

The Plan is the product of extensive work and negotiation with the
Debtor's Creditors. The Plan is a reorganizing plan that
contemplates the financial rehabilitation of the Debtor and the
continuation of its business and operations. The primary purpose of
the Plan is to ensure that the Debtor's stabilized cash flow can
service its current obligations, Secured Claims as restructured by
the Plan, and Debtor's obligations to, among others, holders of
Allowed General Unsecured Claims. The restructuring proposed in the
Plan will enable the Debtor to exit Chapter 11, service its debts,
and continue its existing operations. The Debtor will retain its
assets and operate its business after Confirmation of the Plan. The
Plan contemplates that the current owner of the Debtor will
continue to own the Debtor.

The Plan entails a significant consensual restructuring of the
Debtor's obligations to its principal Creditors and secured
Creditors, BANA and BALC. This restructuring includes a reduction
in the amount of the secured indebtedness owed to the Lenders and
an extension of time to service the balance of the Lenders' Secured
Claims. Without this restructuring, the Debtor would not be able to
remain in business.

The Lenders have agreed to discount their asserted Claims against
the Estate by over $1,000,000 and to reduce their contractual
interest rates and waive any prepayment penalties.  In exchange,
the Lenders will receive monthly payments of principal and interest
on their consensually determined Claims based on an interest rate
of four percent and an amortization period of eight years, with a
term of four years. The Lenders shall retain their first position
liens against all of the Debtor's assets in which either or both of
the Lenders held a perfected security interest as of the Petition
Date. In addition, the Lenders shall receive a second-priority lien
on the GUC Collateral.

The Debtor estimates that holders of Allowed General Unsecured
Claims will receive at least their pro-rata share of $1,225,000,
payable in an initial installment of $75,000 on the Effective Date,
and thereafter in 28 quarterly installments of $41,071 over a
period of seven years.  The Debtor estimates that this will result
in a distribution of at least 40% to the holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims. The payments to the holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims shall be secured by a first-priority lien in the
GUC Collateral.  While the Debtor would prefer to pay a larger
dividend to Unsecured Creditors, the level of secured debt makes
that impossible if the Debtor is to stay in business.

Frederick P. Hooper shall retain his Equity Interests in the
Reorganized Debtor, subject to the Stock Pledge. In exchange for
the treatment of Class 5, Frederick P. Hooper shall make the Plan
Contribution to the Reorganized Debtor on the Effective Date.

The Plan will be funded from the Debtor's continued operations. On
the Effective Date, the Debtor projects it will hold operating Cash
in the approximate amount of $375,000.00 and Auction Proceeds in
the amount of $476,000.00 for an approximate Cash position of
$851,000.00.

A full-text copy of the disclosure statement dated September 1,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y6om8tfw from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:
James C. Fox (BBO #548664)
Rion M. Vaughan (BBO #689153)
RUBERTO, ISRAEL & WEINER, P.C.
255 State Street, 7th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
(617) 742-4200
Fax (617) 742-2355
jcf@riw.com
rmv@riw.com

         About inTerra Innovation

InTerra Innovation, Inc. -- http://www.interra-innovation.com/--
is a specialty construction materials company focused on providing
innovative solutions for the design, manufacture, delivery and
installation of products for the construction industry throughout
the United States.  It offers mobile mixing, specialty grouting,
thermal grouting, lightweight cellular concrete, and concrete and
specialty pumping.

InTerra sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-13469) on Oct. 11, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Frederick P. Hooper, president, the Debtor was
estimated to have assets ranging between $1 million to $10 million
and debts of the same range.  The Hon. Frank J. Bailey is the case
judge.  InTerra tapped Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C., serves as
the Debtor's counsel.  CRS Capstone Partners, LLC, is the
investment banker.


IONIX TECHNOLOGY: Board Accepts Resignations of Two Directors
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Ionix Technology, Inc., accepted the
resignation of the following directors: (i) Mr. Qinghua Shi, as
independent director and member of the Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and (ii) Anthony
Saviano, as independent director and member of the Audit Committee.
The resignations of Mr. Shi and Mr. Saviano were not the result of
any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to the
Company's operations, policies, or practices.

In connection with Mr. Saviano's resignation the following
agreements between the Company and Mr. Saviano, were terminated:
(1) the Consulting Agreement, dated July 29, 2019, and (2) the
Independent Director Agreement, dated July 29, 2019.

                       Director Appointments

On Oct. 27, 2020, effective upon Mr. Shi's resignation, Ms. Xiaolin
Wei was appointed to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of
the Company and member of each of the Compensation Committee and
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Company; and
Ms. Wei has accepted such appointment.

On Oct. 27, 2020, effective upon Mr. Saviano's resignation, Ms.
Yanli Wang was appointed to serve as a member of the Board of
Directors of the Company and as a member of the Audit Committee of
the Company; and Ms. Wang has accepted such appointment.  
  
Ms. Xiaolin Wei, 30, is originally from Dalian, Liaoning Province,
China.  Ms. Wei received a Bachelor degree in Advertising and
Marketing in 2014 from the British Columbia Institute of Technology
(BCIT) in Canada.  From 2015 to present, Ms. Wei has acted as the
General Manager of Shenzhen Hongbo Fund Management, where she has
participated in angel round investments and subsequent stage
financing of domestic projects.  Ms. Wei has valuable practical
experience in the capital market.

Ms. Yanli Wang, 49, graduated from Dongbei University of Finance
and Economics majoring in accounting, and has been a senior
accountant and senior economic analyst.  From October 2012 to
present, Wang has worked as Financial Director, Audit Manager, and
Manager of audit and supervision department, of the Dalian Branch
of China Ping An Life Insurance Co., Ltd.  From November 1993 to
September 1995, Wang worked at Jiamusi Plastic No. 8 Factory as a
cashier.  From October 1995 to August 1999, she worked at Jiamusi
Great Wall Company as a cost accountant.  From April 2000 to
October 2012, Wang worked at Shanghai Jiaji Express Co., Ltd. as a
financial manager.

Ms. Wang and Ms. Wei are not related to any officer or Director of
the Company.

                            About Ionix

Headquartered in Liaoning Province, China, Ionix Technology, Inc.
-- http://www.iinx-tech.com-- is a holding company that is
principally engaged in the photoelectric display and smart energy
industries.  The company has four operating subsidiaries: Changchun
Fangguan Photoelectric Display Technology Co., Ltd, a company which
specializes in developing, designing, producing, and selling TN and
STN LCD, STN, CSTN, and TFT LCD modules as well as other related
products; Shenzhen Baileqi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd, a
company which specializes in LCD slicing, filling, researching and
designing, manufacturing and selling of LCD Modules (LCM) and PCBs;
Lisite Science Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., a company engaged
in the production of intelligent electronic devices; and Dalian
Shizhe New Energy Technology Co., Ltd., a company engaged in
photo-voltaic power generation, electric vehicles and charging
piles with corresponding operation and maintenance and three
dimensional parking.

Ionix reported a net loss of $277,668 for the year ended June 30,
2020, compared to net income of $397,047 for the year ended June
30, 2019.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $17.18 million in
total assets, $7.58 million in total liabilities, and $9.60 million
in total stockholders' equity.

                            *   *   *

This concludes the Troubled Company Reporter's coverage of Ionix
Technology until facts and circumstances, if any, emerge that
demonstrate financial or operational strain or difficulty at a
level sufficient to warrant renewed coverage.


J & R VALLEY: Seeks Plan Exclusivity Extension Thru Jan. 2021
-------------------------------------------------------------
J & R Valley Oilfield Services, Inc. and Mission Vacuum & Pump
Truck Service, Inc., request the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Mcallen Division, to extend the
exclusive period for filing a plan of reorganization and disclosure
statement until January 15, 2021.

The Debtors have made significant progress, internally, towards
formulating a Plan, where the Debtors have engaged in extensive
negotiations with its primary secured creditor, Rio Bank; and have
additionally engaged in negotiations with Texas National Bank and
Leaf Capital Funding. Moreover, the Debtors have continued to
operate the businesses as Debtors-in-Possession.

The additional time requested by the Debtors and their creditors
will allow them to continue their negotiations to resolve terms by
which creditors would accept the Plan.

Absent an extension, the Debtors' exclusivity deadline was
scheduled to end on September 29, 2020.

A copy of the Debtors' Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3jUL5Fd at no extra charge.

              About J & R Valley Oilfield Services

J & R Valley Oilfield Services Inc. operates in the oil and gas
field services industry.

On June 1, 2020, J & R Valley and its affiliate, Mission Vacuum &
Pump Truck Service, Inc., filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case
No. 20-70182).  

At the time of the filing, J & R Valley disclosed assets of between
$1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same range.
Mission Vacuum had estimated assets of between $500,001 and $1
million and liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million as of
the petition date.   

Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez oversees the cases. The Debtors have
tapped Villeda Law Group as their legal counsel, and Santiago
Gonzalez Jr., CPA as their accountant.


JAMES C. MORRISON: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: James C. Morrison, Jr., D.M.D., P.A.
           dba Greater Houston Endodontics;
           dba Moberi Endodontics;
           aka Moberi Dental Specialists;
           aka Mo Beri Endodontics
        8955 Highway 6 North
        Houston TX 77095

Business Description: James C. Morrison, Jr., D.M.D., P.A. is a
                      privately held company that provides dental
                      services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas

Case No.: 20-35222

Debtor's Counsel: John Akard Jr., Esq.
                  COPLEN & BANKS, P.C.
                  11111 McCracken, Suite A
                  Cypress, TX 77429
                  Tel: (832) 237-8600
                  Email: johnakard@attorney-cpa.com

Total Assets: $365,557

Total Liabilities: $1,187,621

The petition was signed by James C. Morrison, Jr., DMD, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free  at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/DHIGIRI/James_C_Morrison_Jr_DMD_PA__txsbke-20-35222__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


JEFFERY ARAMBEL: Plan Admin Selling Needham Ranch for $4.4 Million
------------------------------------------------------------------
Focus Management Group USA, Inc., the Plan Administrator in the
case of Jeffery Edward Arambel, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of California to authorize the sale of vacant
land in Stanislaus County, California, containing approximately
265.4 acres of land, bearing Assessor's Parcel Nos. 021-015-002,
021-015-023, 021-015-024, 021-015-025, 021-015-026 and 021-013-018,
commonly referred to as the "Needham Ranch", all as further
described in the Vacant Land Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow
Instructions and Addendum No. 1 dated Oct. 14, 2020 which replaces
APN No. 021-012-018 with APN No. 021-013-018, to Tyler C. Angle
and/or his assignee for $4,379,100, subject to overbid.

The proposed sale does not include a financing contingency as the
sale is based upon an "all cash" offer that is scheduled to close
on Dec. 23, 2020.  It is on an "as is, where is" basis, subject to
certain environmental disclosures related to the Property as set
forth in the PSA.

As stated in the PSA Addendum No. 1 dated Sept. 24, 2020 which
incorporates several additional provisions into the Vacant Land
Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions, the Break-Up Fee
of $75,000 will be paid to the Buyer from the proceeds of the sale
of the Property to a successful overbidder.  The fee is intended to
compensate the Buyer for its costs incurred and time and energies
expended in completing its due diligence and related investigations
relating to the Property.  

The Property has been extensively exposed to the market.  The
Buyer's present agreement to pay $4,379,100 is the best current
offer the Reorganizing Debtor has received.  While another
potential buyer had offered more than the current offer, that buyer
was unable to perform its offer and is not currently offering to
purchase the Property.  The Plan Administrator supports the sale of
the Property to Buyer on the terms and conditions set forth in the
PSA subject to overbidding as in the best interests of the estate.


The Estate's listing agreement with Pearson Realty provides for the
Estate to pay a broker's commission of 5% of the gross purchase
price with 2.5% of the commission to be shared with a broker for a
buyer.  The offer for the proposed sale was received and the PSA
entered wherein Pearson Realty is identified as the broker for both
the Estate, as the Seller, and West Coast Marketing Group is
identified as the broker for the Buyer.

The Reorganizing Debtor asks approval for payment of a commission
in the amount of 5% of the gross sales price of $4,379,100 for a
total commission amount of $218,955.  The Buyer is represented by a
broker in the transaction, so half of the Commission would be paid
to Pearson Realty and half of the Commission would be paid to West
Coast Marketing Group upon close of escrow with the Buyer.  If the
Property is sold to an overbidder and the successful overbidder is
represented by another broker or the Buyer is represented by a
broker the 5% Commission will be split 50/50 by Pearson Realty and
the broker for the Buyer.

The Plan Administrator estimates that closing costs and transfer
taxes will not exceed 1.5% of the gross purchase price. Based upon
conversations with the estate's tax professionals, the Plan
Administrator estimates the taxes attributable to this transaction
to be $1,105,926 (consisting of Federal tax of $664,220 and
California tax of $441,706).  Furthermore, the transaction is also
subject to a 1% U.S. Trustee fee, or $43,791.

The Property secures the following estimated claims: (i) Stanislaus
County Tax Collector Tax - $46,439 (est.), (ii) Brighthouse Life
Insurance Co. (First Deed of Trust) - $6,655,067 (as of Plan
Conf.), (iii) SBN V Ag I LLC ("Summit") (Second Deed of Trust) -
$45,491,297 (as of Plan Conf.), (iv) Del Puerto Water District
Utility - $32,312, and (v) Summit (Third Deed of Trust) - $1
million (as of Oct 1, 2019).

Brighthouse and Summit hold secured claims against the Property
allowed by the Plan.  The Plan Administrator has sought and will
continue to seek the consent of Brighthouse and Summit to release
their respective liens, to the extent not paid in full, on the
Property.  It expects that Brighthouse and Summit will so consent
to the sale of the Property free and clear of their liens.  It asks
authority to pay the Stanislaus County Tax Collector and the Del
Puerto Water District from the proceeds of the sale.  Therefore,
their liens will be satisfied and released as paid in full.  

The sale proceeds will first be applied from escrow to pay
reasonable and ordinary closing costs, prorated real property taxes
and assessments, water district fees, U.S. Trustee fees, a reserve
for income taxes (to be held by the Plan Administrator) before
payments are made to Brighthouse and Summit pursuant to the Plan.
The Net Proceeds for Brighthouse/Summit subject to Plan
requirements:  $2,865,977 (est.).

The Plan Administrator anticipates that the sale will create income
tax liability in the estimated amount of $1,105,926 based upon the
advice of the Estate’s tax professionals.  As authorized by the
Plan, it proposes to withhold the amount from the sale proceeds.


The Plan Administrator asks adoption of bidding procedures for the
sale of the Property subject to overbid, summarized as follows:

     (a) Valuation of the consideration being received by the
estate from the sale of the Property at $4,379,100;

     (b) the initial overbid must be at least $100,000 higher than
the $4,379,100 gross sale price that the estate will receive from a
sale to the Buyer, and each successive bid thereafter must be at
least $10,000 more than the previous highest qualified overbid or
such other amounts as the Plan Administrator determines are
appropriate;

     (c) prior to the date of the hearing and before being
permitted to bid, any overbidder must deliver to the Plan
Administrator a deposit payable to Focus Management Group USA,
Inc., Plan Administrator on behalf of the estate, in an amount
equal to $200,000, and if an overbid is successful, the deposit by
the successful overbidder will be non-refundable;

     (d) any overbid must be on the same terms and conditions as
the PSA, and any overbidder must agree to sign a purchase and PSA
for the purchase of the Property in substantially the same form and
terms as the PSA, except that all contingencies will be deemed
satisfied, waived, or otherwise removed and close of escrow will
occur Dec. 23, 2020;

     (e) any overbidder seeking to appear at the hearing must make
arrangements to appear by telephone.  Instructions for telephonic
appearance may be obtained from counsel for the Plan Administrator
as identified in the caption of this Motion;

     (f) Tyler C. Angle or assignee, as the stalking horse buyer
for the Property under the terms of the PSA, will be paid a
break-up fee in the amount of $75,000 from the proceeds of the sale
of the Property to a successful overbidder; and

     (g) approval by the Court of the second highest bid as a
back-up buyer on the same terms and conditions.

The Plan Administrator has provided at least 35-days' notice of the
hearing, with any opposition due 14 days prior to the hearing, to
all of Reorganizing Debtor's creditors as well as the
Post-Confirmation Service List.

The Plan Administrator asks to pay the only known and valid
monetary liens, which are any unpaid real property taxes and water
district charges with the remaining net proceeds to Brighthouse
and, if any additional net proceeds remain after paying
Brighthouse, a partial payment to Summit in accordance with the
allocation provisions of the Plan.  It is informed and believes
that Brighthouse and Summit will consent to the sale of the
Property free and clear of their respective security interests.  It
submits that there are no other valid liens on the Property.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 19, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.

Jeffery Edward Arambel sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Cal. Case No. 18-90029) on Jan. 17, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Reno
F.R. Fernandez, III, Esq., as counsel.


JOHN F. HOGAN: Howard Buying Berkeley Lake Property for $850K
-------------------------------------------------------------
John Francis Hogan asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Georgia to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 4239 River District Drive, Berkeley Lake, Georgia to
Howard Gottlieb Revocable Trust dated July 11, 2005 for $850,000.

The Debtor is an individual who owns the Property.  As shown in his
schedules, there is no mortgage on the Property.  

Two creditors assert liens on the Property:

     a. Internal Revenue Service, in the amount of $3,058,741
pursuant to their filed proof of claim (Claim No. 3); and

     b. Georgia Department of Revenue, in the amount of $41,995.11,
pursuant to the Debtor's schedules.

The Debtor asks entry of an order authorizing him to sell the
Property on the terms set forth in the Agreement for Purchase and
Sale of Real Estate, free and clear of liens, claims, and
encumbrances, with all liens or security interests of the Secured
Creditors attaching to the proceeds of the sale.  As shown in the
Purchase Agreement, the Debtor proposes to sell the Property for
$850,000.  It is an all cash offer.  The closing is scheduled for
Oct. 30, 2020.

The Debtor submits that the proposed purchase price amounts to fair
market value for the Property.  He has determined that selling the
Property pursuant to the Purchase Agreement is in the best
interests of the estate and its creditors.

Finally, the Debtor asks that the order granting the Motion be
effective immediately by providing that the 14-day stays applicable
under Rule 6004(h) of the Bankruptcy Rules be waived.  

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yyjg6s8q from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

John Francis Hogan sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Case No. 20-67418) on June 22, 2020.  The Debtor tapped William
Rountree, Esq., as counsel.


JTS TRUCKING: Elite Buying Albertville Property for $325K
---------------------------------------------------------
JTS Trucking, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Alabama to authorize the private sale of the real
property located at 940 Portwood Drive, Albertville, Alabama to
Elite Millwright and Fabrication, LLC for $325,000.

Prior to and during the pendency of the bankruptcy case, the Debtor
employed the services of Kevin Lowery and RE/MAX The Real Estate
Group, 8563 U. S. Highway 431, Albertville, Alabama 35950, as
Broker for the Estate to assist it in the sale of the Property in
the real estate listing Contract.  The listing contract provides
for a real estate commission of 8%.  There is only one real estate
firm involved in the transaction being Kevin Lowery and RE/MAX and
the Agent is asking payment of said 8% commission in the amount of
$26,000.

The Debtor proposes to sell its interest in the Property free and
clear of any and all mortgages, liens, interests, and/or other
encumbrances by private sale to the Buyer for $325,000.  The
Property is sold "as is, where is" with no warranty of any type
whatsoever.

The Property to be sold is free and clear of the following liens,
mortgages, claims or other interests:

     a. Vantage Bank, by mortgage filed for record in Marshall
County, Alabama on Dec. 30, 2014 in Book 5496 at Page 206 in the
amount of $239,000.  Which will be paid at closing.  Said mortgage
was modified and said Modification Agreement was filed in Marshall
County, Alabama on July 2, 2015 in Book 5569 at Page 296.

     b. The liens, interests and claims of Atlantic Southern
Construction, Inc. as set out in that certain lawsuit styled as
Atlantic Southern Construction, Inc. v. JTS Trucking LLC and John
H. Lowden, filed in the Circuit Court of Marshall County, Alabama
and having case number 50-CV-2018-000021.  Said case has been
removed to the Court and is currently pending as an adversary
proceeding, JTS Trucking LLC v. Atlantic Southern Construction,
Inc., having Adversary Proceeding number 20-40013.  All liens,
claims and interests of Atlantic raised in said lawsuits will be
released from said property and will only be recoverable from the
net proceeds from the sale.  These liens, claims and interests are
in bona fide dispute.

From the proceeds, the Debtor proposes to pay Vantage Bank the
amount necessary to satisfy its mortgage.  It asks authority to
hold the balance of the net proceeds from the sale pending
resolution of the amount of claims, if any, owed to Atlantic.

Finally, the Debtor asks the Court to waive the stay provisions set
forth in Rule 6004(h) to allow the sale to take place as soon as
practicable.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y5wn5k6d from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                        About JTS Trucking

JTS Trucking LLC, a trucking company based in Albertville, Alabama,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Court (Bankr.
N.D. Ala. Case No. 20-40423) on March 6, 2020, listing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed
by
Susan M. Lowden, its member. The Debtor tapped Harry P. Long, Esq.,
at the Law Offices of Harry P. Long, LLC as its counsel; Bill
Massey and MDA Professional Group, PC as its accountants; and Kevin
Lowery and RE/MAX The Real Estate Group as broker and property
manager for the Debtor's estate.


K&W CAFETERIAS: Says Restaurants Remain Open Despite Chapter 11
---------------------------------------------------------------
Isaac Groves of Times-News reports that while K&W Cafeteria closed
10 locations, including Asheboro, ahead of declaring bankruptcy, 18
are still open and serving including the K&W Cafeteria on Ramada
Road, Burlington.

"Too often people don't listen or read past Chapter 11 and don't
look at the restructuring part," said Dax Allred, president of K&W.
"We closed locations that did not recover substantially enough from
the pandemic."

Allred said six of the shuttered cafeterias closed in the two weeks
before the bankruptcy filing in early September.

"We are eager to serve our loyal guests, and we look forward to
continuing recovery as a safe and viable vaccine is developed for
the coronavirus," Allred said. "As North Carolina enters phase 2.5,
hopefully, there would be a psychological impact as we progress to
phase three."

                      About K&W Cafeterias

K&W Cafeterias, Inc., a company based in Winston Salem, N.C., filed
a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No. 20-50674) on Sept.
2, 2020. Judge Benjamin A. Kahn presides over the case.  In the
petition signed by Dax C. Allred, president, the Debtor disclosed
$30,085,274 in assets and $22,189,229 in liabilities.

The Debtor has tapped Northen Blue, LLP as its bankruptcy counsel
and Bell Davis & Pitt P.A. and Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete
LLP as its special counsel.

William Miller, U.S. bankruptcy administrator, appointed a
committee to represent unsecured creditors in Debtor's Chapter 11
case.  The committee tapped Waldrep Wall Babcock & Bailey PLLC as
its bankruptcy counsel.


KENNEDY-WILSON HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook on BB+ ICR to Negative
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook on its 'BB+' issuer credit
rating on Beverly Hills, Calif.-based Kennedy-Wilson Holdings Inc.
(KWH) to negative from stable.

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our view that KWH's credit
metrics will remain under pressure over the next few quarters,
given substantial EBITDA contraction from uncharacteristically low
capital gains due to the slow volume of dispositions since the
onset of the pandemic. As of June 30, 2020, debt to EBITDA rose
above 11x, and we believe it could continue to trend higher unless
transaction activity accelerates meaningfully."

"KWH's credit metrics weakened because of a material decline of
capital gains, and we believe this could extend through the next
several quarters."

"Market volatility and uncertainty about the duration and effects
of the COVID-19 pandemic halted transactions across the globe.
During the first half of 2020, KWH's volume of asset sales was
considerably low, resulting in unsubstantial gains from asset
sales. This weakened the company's EBITDA base more than 50%
compared with the first half of 2019. As a result, S&P Global
Ratings' adjusted debt to EBITDA rose to 11.3x as of June 30, 2020
(on a rolling-12-month basis), up from 8.9x a year before. We
acknowledge that KWH's reliance on gains from asset sales will
continue to add volatility to the company's credit metrics. We
believe that the steep decline of gains and EBITDA during the first
half of the year will be difficult to revert over the next two to
three quarters, pressuring our tolerance for leverage at the
current rating level." Adjusted debt to EBITDA sustained above 11x
could result in a one-notch downgrade."

The multifamily portfolio in the Western U.S. continues to
outperform peers and provides cushion for other property types
against pandemic-related effects.

KWH's multifamily platform accounts for about 47% of annual net
operating income (NOI) and is largely located in the Western U.S.
As of June 30, 2020, the portfolio was performing well, with a
94.5% occupancy rate and 98% rent collection. Same-property NOI was
healthy for market rate properties at 1.9% for the first six months
of the year and quite strong for the affordable segment at 6.5%,
which is well above the peer average. KWH's multifamily portfolio
is well-positioned, and we expect little impact from the pandemic
and the economic recession over the next one to two years given its
garden-style layout and its predominantly suburban locations, which
have significantly outperformed urban locations industry-wide.

The office portfolio is performing adequately, but S&P thinks it
could face pressure in the medium to long term.

KWH's office portfolio accounts for about 34% of annual NOI and is
evenly distributed across the U.S., the U.K., and Ireland. As of
second-quarter 2020, the portfolio was highly occupied at 95%, and
it collected 96% of cash rent for the quarter, in line with office
peers both in the U.S. and in Europe. However, the acceleration of
remote working, as a result of the pandemic, is causing tenants
globally and across industries to reassess their real estate
footprint requirements. S&P believes KWH's portfolio of suburban
and mid-rise buildings is likely to fare better than high-rise
buildings in gateway markets, but we think the sector will still be
challenged over the medium term as leases expire. As of Dec. 31,
2019, 30% of KWH's annualized base rent for the commercial
portfolio was set to expire through 2022, with only 7% expiring in
2020. This could buffer some of the short-term effects, but we
believe that, over the medium term, there is potential for mild
occupancy declines, increased pressure on rental rates and
renegotiation for shorter-term duration of lease agreements, upon
renewal.

S&P expects continued gradual improvement from retail and hotel
properties.

As of June 30, 2020, retail and hotel properties contributed a
combined 15% of annualized NOI. These property types were shocked
by stay-at-home mandates globally, which resulted in rent
suspensions and requests for rent deferrals across the retail and
leisure sectors. Over the past few years, KWH had lowered its
exposure to these sectors, so the impact on its operating
performance will be contained. KWH reported cash rent collection of
54% for its retail portfolio as of the end of the second quarter,
with tenants in the UK (the largest portion of the retail
portfolio) largely responsible for the drag. S&P expects rent
collections to improve as local governments ease-up and allow
tenants to reopen. The Shelbourne hotel, closed in March and
reopened at the end of June, and it expects a slow, but gradual
improvement in occupancy and revenue per available room (RevPAR)
over the next couple of years.

Higher proportion of secured debt, combined with weaker valuations
for different property types across KWH's portfolio, could hurt
recovery prospects for unsecured bondholders.

S&P said, "We rate the unsecured notes at Kennedy Wilson Europe Plc
(KWE) level one notch higher than KWH's corporate credit rating,
based on our estimated recovery prospects of about 70% in the event
of a hypothetical default scenario. We base this recovery on
available funds for unsecured bondholders after priority claims and
first-priority secured claims (property-level debt). We rate
Kennedy Wilson Inc (KW)'s unsecured debt one notch lower than KWH's
issuer credit rating, based on our estimated recovery prospects of
about 15%. Significant higher use of secured debt within the
European portfolio could potentially weaken our estimated recovery
prospects and could lead to a downgrade on KWE's unsecured bonds.
We note that as of June 30, 2020 the amount of secured debt did not
increase significantly and KWH tendered a portion of KWE's bonds,
which we believe limits the likelihood for an immediate change to
the company's recovery prospects."

Projects in lease-up and under construction can take longer than
anticipated to stabilize and delay accretive EBITDA

KWH has a sizable development pipeline of $1.06 billion (~10% of
gross assets), of which 32% has been funded. KWH has three projects
under construction (two multifamily in the U.S. and one office in
the U.K.) planned for delivery in 2020; all three are largely
funded and completed. The company has not experienced significant
delays or missteps, and yields remain within underwriting
assumptions. KWH has historically exhibited good leasing velocity
at its multifamily projects. However, S&P believes that guidelines
for social distancing could potentially delay the timing of
stabilization targets and accretive EBITDA, particularly for its
office properties coming on-line over the next few quarters.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors for this
credit rating change:

-- Health and safety

S&P said, "The negative outlook reflects our view that KWH's credit
metrics will remain under pressure over the next few quarters,
given substantial EBITDA contraction from uncharacteristically low
capital gains due to the slow volume of dispositions through the
pandemic. As of June 30, 2020, adjusted debt to EBITDA rose above
11x, and we believe it could continue to trend higher unless
transaction activity accelerates meaningfully."

S&P could lower the rating on KWH if:

-- Debt to EBITDA remains above 11x over the next two to three
quarters from stagnant EBITDA growth or from a
higher-than-anticipated use of debt.

-- Fixed-charge coverage (FCC) falls below 1.7x from higher
secured annual debt obligations or contracting EBITDA.

S&P could also lower the issue-level ratings on KWH's unsecured
debt if recovery prospects for bondholders compress from:

-- Higher use of secured debt in Europe weakening recovery
expectations for KWE's bonds to below 70%.

-- Higher use of secured debt to fund development, particularly in
the U.S., such that KW's recovery prospects fall below 10%.

S&P could revise the outlook to stable if:

-- Adjusted debt to EBITDA declines below 9.5x- and is maintained
there.

-- KWH establishes clear governors that provide visibility into
capital gains that reduce volatility of credit metrics.


LA KASA DESIGN: Seeks to Hire Van Horn Law Group as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
La Kasa Design Studio, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Van Horn Law
Group, P.A. as counsel.

The firm will render these professional services to the Debtor:

     (a) give advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and
duties as a debtor-in-possession and the continued management of
its business operations;

     (b) advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
complying with the U.S. Trustee's Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements and with the rules of the court;

     (c) prepare motions, pleadings, orders, applications,
adversary proceedings, and other legal documents necessary in the
administration of the case;

     (d) protect the interest of the Debtor in all matters pending
before the court; and

     (e) represent the Debtor in negotiation with its creditors in
the preparation of a plan.

Van Horn Law Group's hourly rates are as follows:

     Chad Van Horn, Esq.       $450
     Associates                $350
     Jay Molluso               $250
     Law Clerks                $200
     Paralegals                $200

In addition, the firm will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses
it incurs in accordance with its customary billing practices.

Chad Van Horn, Esq., founding partner of Van Horn Law Group, P.A.,
and Melissa Goolsarran Ramnauth, Esq., a regular associate of Van
Horn Law Group, P.A., disclosed in court filings that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Chad Van Horn, Esq.
     VAN HORN LAW GROUP, P.A.
     330 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 450
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Telephone: (954) 765-3166
     E-mail: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

                    About La Kasa Design Studio

La Kasa Design Studio, Inc. filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
20-21676) on October 26, 2020. Judge Laurel M. Isicoff oversees the
case. Van Horn Law Group, P.A., led by Chad Van Horn, Esq., serves
as the Debtor's counsel.


LAMBERT'S CONSTRUCTION: Higgins Says It's Not an Unsecured Creditor
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor Higgins Benjamin PLLC objects to the Disclosure Statement
and proposed Chapter 11 Plan of Debtor Lambert's Construction
Company of Bluefield.

Higgins Benjamin claims that the Disclosure Statement and proposed
Plan appears to place Higgins Benjamin in the class of unsecured
creditors. Higgins Benjamin's claim is a secured claim, secured by
an attorney's lien on the proceeds of the Debtor's action against
Crawford Construction, LLC.

Higgins Benjamin asserts that the legal services provided by
Higgins Benjamin in connection with the Crawford Action were
Virginia legal services. Although West Virginia recognizes an
attorney's charging lien in ways and scope nearly identical to the
State of Virginia, Higgins Benjamin's lien is a secured right as a
matter of Virginia statutory law.

A full-text copy of Higgins Benjamin's objection to plan and
disclosure statement dated September 15, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y3hfaelo from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Higgins Benjamin's counsel:

         Steven D. Hedges
         Higgins Benjamin PLLC
         301 N. Elm Street, Suite 800
         Greensboro, NC 27401
         Tel: 336-389-4440
         Fax: 336-274-4650

                 About Lambert's Construction

Lambert's Construction Company of Bluefield, Inc. --
http://www.lambertscontracting.com/-- is a general contractor in
Bluefield, West Virginia. Its services include masonry, paving,
demolition and excavation, landscaping, and electrical work.  It
has been serving the Mercer, Bland, and Giles counties since 2008.

Lambert's Construction Company sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 19-10086) on
July 9, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated
to have assets between $500,000 and $1 million and liabilities
between $1 million and $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge
Frank W. Volk. The Debtor is represented by Caldwell & Riffee.


LAMBERT'S CONSTRUCTION: Plan Confirmation Hearing Reset to Nov. 17
------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 13, 2020, Debtor Lambert's Construction Company of
Bluefield filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia a Disclosure Statement and Chapter 11
Plan.

On August 28, 2020, Judge Frank W. Volk conditionally approved the
Disclosure Statement and ordered that Sept. 23, 2020, is the
hearing on the proposed Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan.

The Sept. 23 confirmation hearing was cancelled pending
reassignment of the case.

On Oct. 6, 2020, Judge Roger L. Gregory, chief judge of the Fourth
Circuit, entered an order assigning the case to Judge Paul M.
Black.

A hearing on Nov. 17, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. via videoconference has
been scheduled to consider confirmation of the PLan.  The Court
will also consider the objection filed by Higgins, Benjamin, PLLC.

                   About Lambert's Construction

Lambert's Construction Company of Bluefield, Inc. --
http://www.lambertscontracting.com/-- is a general contractor in
Bluefield, West Virginia. Its services include masonry, paving,
demolition and excavation, landscaping, and electrical work.  It
has been serving the Mercer, Bland, and Giles counties since 2008.

Lambert's Construction Company sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 19-10086) on
July 9, 2019. At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated
to have assets between $500,000 and $1 million and liabilities
between $1 million and $10 million. The case is assigned to Judge
Frank W. Volk. The Debtor is represented by Caldwell & Riffee.


LATAM AIRLINES: Court Approves Revised $2.45B Bankruptcy Loan
-------------------------------------------------------------
LATAM Airlines Group S.A. on Sept. 18, 2020 said it has received
approval from the Court of the Southern District of New York for
the modified debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing proposal that was
filed on September 17, 2020. Judge James Garrity Jr’s decision
will enable the group to access the US$2.45 billion required to
tackle the impact of COVID-19.

"The approval of the DIP is a very important step for the
sustainability of the group and we appreciate the wide interest and
the confidence in what LATAM has built and our long-term project.
Now we begin a new phase, working towards the presentation of our
reorganization plan as part of the Chapter 11 process," said
Roberto Alvo, CEO of LATAM Airlines Group.

On May 26, 2020, LATAM Airlines Group and its affiliates in Chile,
Colombia, Ecuador, the United States and Peru initiated a voluntary
reorganization process under Chapter 11 protection in the United
States, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In July,
LATAM’s Brazilian affiliate also filed for Chapter 11.

On Sept. 10, Judge Garrity entered an order blocking Latam Airlines
from accessing as much as $2.45 billion of proposed bankruptcy
financing.  The credit agreement flouted bankruptcy rules,
according to a ruling by Garrity, because it would have let Latam
convert $900 million of the debt into new stock.  A copy of the
ruling is available at
https://www.leagle.com/decision/inbco20200911682

On Sept. 19, 2020, Judge Garrity entered an order granting final
approval to the financing.
A copy of the order is available at:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/LWNPETI/LATAM_Airlines_Group_SA__nysbke-20-11254__1091.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

Oaktree Capital Management is providing Latam with more than $1
billion of financing, while the $900 million portion will be
provided by Qatar Airways.

Oaktree Capital Management L.P. leads the Tranche A DIP Lenders,
while QA Investments  Limited, QA Investments 2 Limited, Costa
Verde Aeronáutica S.A., Lozuy S.A. and Knighthead Capital
Management LLC are the Tranche C Knighthead Group Lenders.

The DIP Credit Agreement contemplates a superpriority multi-draw
term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of up to $2.45
billion in new money financing consisting of

   (A) a secured Tranche A facility (the "Tranche A DIP Facility")
in an aggregate maximum principal amount of $1.3 billion (the
"Tranche A DIP Commitment," and collectively the loans made
thereunder the "Tranche A DIP Loans");

   (B) a secured Tranche B facility (the "Tranche B DIP Facility")
in an aggregate maximum principal amount to be determined up to
$750 million; and

   (C) a secured Tranche C facility provided by the Tranche C DIP
Lenders in an aggregate principal amount of $1.15 billion
(including the Tranche C Increase Commitment (as defined in the DIP
Credit Agreement)) (the "Tranche C DIP Commitment," and
collectively the loans made thereunder the "Tranche C DIP Loans”
and together with the Tranche A DIP Loans, the “DIP Loans").

The Court issued initial decision concluded that the DIP Motions
could not be approved for the reasons set forth therein and found,
inter  alia, that the Modified Equity Subscription Election (as
defined therein) gives rise to improper sub rosa plan treatment of
the Tranche C Lenders (as defined therein) and the Debtors' equity
holders, but also found, inter alia, that the terms of the DIP
Credit Agreement reflect a "fair price", and had been thoroughly
market tested, that the financing proposed in the DIP Motions
satisfied the “entire fairness” test, that there are grounds
under section 364(c) to authorize entry into the DIP Credit
Agreement and that each of the DIP Lenders are entitled to a "good
faith" finding under section 364.

Upon the Supplemental Submission filed on Sept. 16, 2020, which
attached an updated version of the DIP Credit Agreement that, among
other changes, conformed the DIP Credit Agreement to the Initial
Decision and made additional revisions to reflect a resolution of
the prior objections made by, among others, the Creditors;
Committee and Knighthead Capital Management, LLC, the Court on
Sept. 18, 2020 granted final approval of the DIP Financing.

                       About LATAM Airlines

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. -- http://www.latam.com/-- is a
pan-Latin American airline holding company involved in the
transportation of passengers and cargo and operates as one unified
business enterprise.   

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. is the largest passenger airline in South
America. Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, LATAM offered
passenger transport services to 145 different destinations
in 26 countries, including domestic flights in Argentina, Brazil,
Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international services
within Latin America as well as to Europe, the United States, the
Caribbean, Oceania, Asia and Africa.

LATAM Airlines Group S.A. and its 28 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-11254) on May 25,
2020. Affiliates in Chile, Peru, Colombia, Ecuador and the United
States are part of the Chapter 11 filing.

The Debtors disclosed $21,087,806,000 in total assets and
$17,958,629,000 in total liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., is the case judge.

Debtors tapped Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP as general
bankruptcy counsel; FTI Consulting as restructuring advisor; and
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Claro & Cia in Chile as special
counsel. Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.



LE TOTE: Seeks to Hire Deloitte Tax to Provide Tax Services
-----------------------------------------------------------
Le Tote, Inc. and its debtor affiliates seek approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to employ
Deloitte Tax LLP to provide them with tax services.

The firm's services will include:

     (a) Tax Preparation Engagement Letter. Pursuant to the terms
of the Tax Preparation Engagement Letter, Deloitte Tax will prepare
2019 fiscal year and 2020 short year federal, state, and local
income tax returns for the Debtors. In addition, Deloitte Tax will
assist in calculating the amounts of extension payments and
preparing the extension requests for the 2019 and 2020 short year
federal, state, and local income tax returns.

     (b) 2020 Tax Advisory Engagement Letter. Pursuant to the terms
of the Tax Advisory Engagement Letter, Deloitte Tax will provide
tax advisory services for the Debtors on federal, foreign, state
and local tax matters during the period through December 31, 2021.

     (c) State Tax Consulting Work Order. Pursuant to the terms of
the Tax Return Work Order and the 2020 Tax Advisory Engagement
Letter, Deloitte Tax will provide multistate advisory services to
assist the Debtors with state income and sales and use tax nexus
analysis. Deloitte Tax will also compute the approximate state tax
exposure in those states wherein a net worth or capital-based tax
is imposed.

     (d) Restructuring Work Order. Pursuant to the terms of the
Restructuring Work Order and the 2020 Tax Advisory Engagement
Letter, Deloitte Tax will provide tax advisory services to assist
the Debtors with their evaluation of a potential debt
restructuring. Deloitte Tax's services may include (i) the
evaluation of certain potential federal income tax consequences and
considerations related to the debt restructuring; (ii) assistance
with the calculations of the Debtors' tax basis in assets,
cancellation of indebtedness income, and 2020 net operating losses;
(iii) assistance with the calculations of certain disposition gains
or losses for tax purposes; (iv) assistance in identifying relevant
transfer and indirect taxes; (v) advisory services related to
Internal Revenue Code section 382 computations for ownership
shifts; and (vi) other tax advisory services related to other tax
considerations of the Debtors' restructuring, as requested by the
Debtors and agreed to by Deloitte Tax.

Deloitte Tax will bill the Debtors a fixed fee of $205,000 for tax
preparation services related to the 2019 tax year and a fixed fee
of $150,000 for such services related to the 2020 short tax year.

In the event that Deloitte Tax performs services that relate to
these returns, but fall outside the specific scope of those
contemplated by the Tax Preparation Engagement Letter, Deloitte Tax
will charge the Debtors at the hourly rates set forth below:

     Partner / Principal / Managing Director     $854
     Senior Manager                              $763
     Manager                                     $644
     Senior Consultant / Senior Staff            $536
     Associate                                   $434
     Project Professional                        $280

Additionally, Deloitte Tax estimates that the fee for the
preparation of additional state and local tax returns not listed to
the Tax Preparation Engagement Letter will be $2,000 for each
separate return and between $2,500 and $3,000 for each combined
return based on the level of information requested on the tax
return.

Pursuant to the terms of the 2020 Tax Advisory Engagement Letter,
the State Tax Consulting Work Order, and the Restructuring Work
Order, Deloitte Tax will charge the Debtors for services performed
under each of those Engagement Agreements at the hourly rates set
forth above.

Deloitte Tax will also seek reimbursements for all reasonable and
necessary expenses incurred in rendering services to the Debtors.

In the 90 days prior to the Petition Date, the Debtors paid
Deloitte Tax approximately $216,375, including retainer amounts,
for services performed or to be performed under the Engagement
Agreements. As of the Petition Date, no amounts were outstanding
with respect to the invoices issued by Deloitte Tax to the Debtors
prior to such date, and approximately $28,720 of the retainer
amounts remained outstanding as of such date.

The Debtors will coordinate with Deloitte Tax and the Debtors'
other professionals to minimize unnecessary duplication of efforts
among them.

Kenneth Gerstel, a partner of the firm of Deloitte Tax LLP,
disclosed in court filings that the firm is a "disinterested
person" within the meaning of section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Kenneth Gerstel
     DELOITTE TAX LLP
     12830 El Camino Real, Suite 600
     San Diego, CA 92130
     Telephone: (619) 232-6500
     Facsimile: (619) 237-6801
     
                        About Le Tote Inc.

Le Tote, Inc. and its affiliates operate both an online,
subscription-based clothing rental service and a full-service
fashion retailer with 38 brick-and-mortar locations and a robust
e-commerce platform. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Le Tote
temporarily closed all retail locations in March 2020, although
they continue to operate the Le Tote and Lord & Taylor websites.

Le Tote and its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case
No. 20-33332) on Aug. 2, 2020. The petitions were signed by Ed
Kremer, chief restructuring officer. At the time of the filing,
Debtors disclosed between $100 million and $500 million in both
assets and liabilities. Judge Keith L. Phillips oversees the
cases.

Debtors have tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP as their legal counsel; Kutak Rock LLP and
Crenshaw, Ware & Martin, PLC as local counsel; Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP as special counsel; Berkeley Research LLC as financial
advisor; Nfluence Partners as investment banker; and Deloitte Tax
LLP as tax services provider. Stretto is the notice, claims and
balloting agent, and administrative advisor.

On August 12, 2020, the U.S. Trustee appointed the official
committee of unsecured creditors in the chapter 11 cases. The
committee tapped Cooley LLP as its counsel and BDO Consulting
Group, LLC as financial advisor.


LIBERTY HOLDING: Plan to Be Heard With Lift Stay Motion on Nov. 9
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On June 29, 2020, debtor Liberty Holding, LLC, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria
Division, a Disclosure Statement under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

On August 28, 2020, Judge Brian F. Kenney approved the Disclosure
Statement and set a hearing on Oct. 20, 2020 to consider
confirmation of the Plan.

A hearing was weld on Sept. 2, 2020, on the motion for relief from
stay filed on behalf of Blue Ridge Bank N.A. at which time the
Court, upon the ore tenus motion of the Debtor and with the consent
of the Bank, found that for the convenience of the parties and
interests of justice that the hearing on confirmation of Debtor's
previously filed Disclosure Statement and Plan should be continued
from its previously scheduled date and should be heard together
with the motion for relief from stay which was also continued by
the Court.  The judge accordingly has entered an agreed order
stating that the hearing on confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan
will be held on Nov. 9, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Robert Easterling
          2217 Princess Anne St., Ste. 100-2
          Frederickburg, VA 22401

                    About Liberty Holding

Liberty Holding, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 20-10947) on March 30, 2020, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Robert B. Easterling, Attorney at Law.


LITTLE MINDS: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Little Minds 1st Academy, LLC
           DBA Little Minds 1st Academy
        1730 Tuscan Heights Blvd.
        Kennesaw, GA 30152

Business Description: Little Minds 1st Academy, LLC is the owner
                      of fee simple title to a 14,140 square foot
                      building used as a child care facility
                      situated at 1730 Tuscan Heights Blvd.,
                      Kennesaw, Georgia, having an appraised value

                      of $1.7 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia

Case No.: 20-71346

Debtor's Counsel: Paul Reece Marr, Esq.
                  PAUL REECE MARR, P.C.
                  Suite 960300
                  Galleria Parkway, N.W.
                  Atlanta, GA 30339
                  Tel: (770) 984-2255
                  Fax: (678) 623-5109
                  Email: paul.marr@marrlegal.com

Total Assets: $1,754,917

Total Liabilities: $1,967,749

The petition was signed by Virginia Ann Harris, manager.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's five unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/VK6WWNI/Little_Minds_1st_Academy_LLC__ganbke-20-71346__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


LOOT CRATE: Seeks Dec. 8 Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period
-------------------------------------------------------------
Loot Crate, Inc., now known as Old LC, Inc. and its affiliates
following the closing of the sale of its assets, ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to extend the
Debtors' exclusive period to file a Chapter 11 plan through
December 8, 2020, and to solicit acceptances through February 8,
2021.

Since the Court's prior extension of the Debtors' exclusive
periods, the Debtors have:

     (i) continued to resolve substantial tax claims, which are to
be paid under the Court approved tax funding agreement. In fact,
the Debtors have now resolved tax claims for state sales tax
obligations for 26 out of 28 of the states that may have potential
claims against the estates (including claims which may be a
priority in nature);

    (ii) reached resolution between the two key creditor
constituents in these cases -- the pre-petition lender, and the
Creditors' Committee -- on a waterfall recovery under a plan; and

   (iii) continued investigating the actions by certain of the
Debtors' former insiders and parties which may have exercised
control or blocking positions with respect to the Debtors'
actions.

The Debtors have worked cooperatively with the Creditors' Committee
and the Debtors' pre-petition secured lender and will continue to
do so. No one has proposed, formally or informally, any other path
to resolution of these cases. No motions have been filed to seek
payment of administrative claims, or other evidence that these
cases are languishing to the detriment of creditors.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
stretto.com at https://bit.ly/2GYZwcG at no extra charge.

                     About Loot Crate Inc.

Founded in 2012, Loot Crate, Inc. f/k/a Loot Crate Inc., is a
worldwide leader in fan subscription boxes.  It partners with
industry leaders in entertainment, gaming, sports, and pop culture
to deliver monthly-themed crates; produces interactive experiences
and digital content; and films original video productions.  Since
2012, the company has delivered more than 32 million crates to fans
in 35 territories across the globe.

Loot Crate and three affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11791) on Aug. 11, 2019. Loot
Crate was estimated to have less than $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP as lead counsel;
Robinson & Cole LLP as Delaware and conflicts counsel; FocalPoint
Securities, LLC, as investment banker; Portage Point Partners as
financial advisor; and Mark Palmer of Theseus Strategy Group as
chief transformation officer. Bankruptcy Management Solutions,
Inc., which conducts business under the name Stretto, is the claims
agent and maintains the site https://case.stretto.com/lootcrate.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on Aug. 22, 2019,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case. The Committee retained
Morris James LLP, as co-counsel; Dundon Advisers LLC, as financial
advisor; and FocalPoint Securities, LLC, as investment banker.

Loot Crate, Inc., is now known as Old LC, Inc. following the
closing of the sale of its assets.



MANUFACTURING METHODS: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Manufacturing Methods, LLC
        9244 Industrial Blvd.
        Leland, NC 28451

Business Description: Manufacturing Methods, LLC primarily
                      operates in the fabricated structural metal
                      business.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 3, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of North Carolina

Case No.: 20-03549

Judge: Hon. David M. Warren

Debtor's Counsel: Algernon L. Butler, III, Esq.
                  BUTLER & BUTLER, L.L.P.
                  111 N. 5th Avenue
                  PO Box 38
                  Wilmington, NC 28401
                  Tel: 910-762-1908
                  Fax: 910-762-9441
                  E-mail: albutleriii@butlerbutler.com

Total Assets: $1,538,374

Total Liabilities: $2,566,409

The petition was signed by Hanson O. Peterson, III, manager.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free  at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/P3UBBWY/Manufacturing_Methods_LLC__ncebke-20-03549__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


METRO CONCRETE: Case Summary & 19 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Metro Concrete, Inc.
        27835 215th St.
        Dallas Center, IA 50063

Case No.: 20-02011

Business Description: Metro Concrete, Inc. offers masonry and
                      concrete services to residential and
                      commercial customers.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Iowa

Judge: Hon. Anita L. Shodeen

Debtor's Counsel: Jeffrey D. Goetz, Esq.
                  BRADSHAW, FOWLER, PROCTOR & FAIRGRAVE PC
                  801 Grand Avenue, Suite 3700
                  Des Moines, IA 50309-8004
                  Tel: 515-243-4191
                  Email: goetz.jeffrey@bradshawlaw.com

Debtor's
General
Corporate
Reorganization
Counsel:          Donald J. Charnetski Esq.
                  CHARNETSKI, LACINA, CLOWER & FOLLETTE LLP

Debtor's
Special
Conflicts
Counsel:          Michael A. Brandess, Esq.
                  Mark S. Melickian, Esq.
                  SUGAR FELSENTHAL GRAIS & HELSINGER LLP

Debtor's
Financial
Advisor:          NEWPORT ADVISORS CORPORATION

Total Assets: $959,255

Total Liabilities: $1,221,644

The petition was signed by Richard Hammons, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 19 unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/UFIK2AQ/Metro_Concrete_Inc__iasbke-20-02011__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


METRONOMIC HOLDINGS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
Metronomic Holdings, LLC, according to court dockets.
    
                    About Metronomic Holdings

Metronomic Holdings, LLC is a Florida based real estate company
that owns and manages a portfolio of real estate assets in
Miami-Dade County, Fla. and McHenry County, Ill.  

Metronomic Holdings filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 20-20310) on Sept. 23, 2020.  At the time of the filing,
the Debtor disclosed assets of between $50 million and $100 million
and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Laurel M. Isicoff oversees the case.  The Debtor hired Aleida
Martinez Molina as its legal counsel.


MICHAEL GALMOR: Trustee Selling Emmert Property for $448K
---------------------------------------------------------
Kent Ries, the Trustee of Michael Stephen Galmor and Galmor's/G&G
Steam Service, Inc., and the Liquidator the Galmor Family Limited
Partnership ("GFLP"), asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas to authorize the sale of real property
described as all of Section 5, Block A-8, H&GN, Wheeler County,
Texas, and containing approximately 640 acres, to Four Wheeler
Farms, LLC for $448,000, subject to overbid.

Included among the GFLP real property is the Emmert Property.  The
Trustee has received the offer of the Buyer by Jeremy Rehwald,
Manager to purchase the Emmert Property for the price of $448,000.
He believes the offer represents a fair value of the Emmert
Property.  The Emmert Property was listed for sale by the Trustee's
broker for $700/acre.  The sale price is equal to the listing price
for the 640-acre tract.

Other than property taxes, the Trustee is not aware of liens on the
Emmert Property.  A survey is required by the sale contract.  The
approximate cost of a survey for the Emmert Property is $2,500.

The Trustee asks authority of the Court to execute all documents
and instruments necessary to effectuate the purposes and intent of
the Motion.  He believes the sale is in the best interest of all
creditors of the estates and should be approved.

In order to maximize the liquidation value of property of the
estate, the Trustee will sell the Emmert Property to the highest
bidder.  Accordingly, he has developed the following provisions
governing the sale of the Emmert Property in the event competing
bids are received:

     A. In the event the Trustee receives one or more competing
bids, in writing, from one or more parties, a telephonic auction
will be held among all interested bidders.

     B. A competing bid must be in writing, in an amount of at
least $453,000 and served upon the Trustee no later than 4:30 p.m.
on Tuesday, November 3, 2020, at the office of Kent Ries, 2700 S.
Western St., Suite 300, Amarillo, Texas 79109.  A good faith
earnest money in the amount of $10,000 must accompany the competing
bid.   

     C. In the event Trustee receives more than one or more
competing bids in a timely manner, a telephonic auction of the
Emmert Property will be held at 11:30 a.m. on Nov. 5, 2020.

     D. In order to participate in the telephonic auction, an
interested bidder must have given timely written notice of a
competing bid, have deposited $10,000 with the Trustee and have
specified the telephone number at which bidder may be reached for
the auction.   The bidding will be in increments of, at least,
$5,000.

     E. Any competing bidder must provide the Trustee with the
evidence of financial resources to fund the closing of the proposed
purchase.   

     F. The highest bidder at the telephonic auction will be
awarded the Emmert Property and closing of the sale of the Emmert
Property to the highest bidder will occur within 15 days from Court
approval.  In the event the highest bidder is unable to close as
provided herein such bidder will forfeit its earnest money deposit
and the Trustee may, in his sole discretion, sell the Emmert
Property to the next highest bidder or renotice the entire sale.

Finally, the Trustee asks that the 14-day stay requirement pursuant
to F.R.B.P. 6004(h) be waived.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 5, 2020 at 4:00 p.m.

A copy of the Contract is available at https://tinyurl.com/yanrj8pw
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Michael Stephen Galmor owns and manages Galmor's/G&G Steam Service,
Inc. of Shamrock, Texas.  He also raises cattle in his individual
capacity.  Michael Stephen Galmor sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 18-20209) on June 19, 2018.  The Debtor
tapped Max Ralph Tarbox, Esq., at Tarbox Law, P.C. as counsel.


MOLINA HEALTHCARE: Moody's Gives Ba3 Rating on $650MM Unsec. Notes
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to the planned
issuance of $650 million in new Molina Healthcare, Inc. senior
unsecured notes with a 10-year tenor. The proceeds will be used to
pre-pay $330 million in senior unsecured notes due in 2025 and for
general corporate purposes. The outlook on Molina and its
affiliates is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

According to Moody's, Molina's Ba3 debt rating reflects the
company's solid earnings momentum, competitive margins and strong
position in the Medicaid segment. On October 6, 2020, Moody's
upgraded Molina to Ba3 from B2, a reflection of Molina's sustained
improvement in results since a previous upgrade in April 2019.

Molina's strengths are partly offset by its concentration in
Medicaid, which entails contract re-procurement risk, as well as
high leverage as measured by debt-to-capital and lower membership
levels in recent years

Moody's views the anticipated $320 million net increase in debt as
credit negative; however, it does not impact its overall rationale.
Following the debt issuance, pro forma adjusted debt-to-capital
with Moody's adjustments as of Q3 2020 is a high 52.7%, but a
modest increase from 51.5% as of Q2 2020. Furthermore, pro forma
debt to EBITDA remains strong at 1.8x.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Factors that could lead to a rating upgrade include: (i) Improved
diversification beyond the company's concentration in Medicaid and
the individual full-risk business and (ii) adjusted debt to capital
sustained below 45%, with a well laddered debt structure, and
adjusted debt to EBITDA remains below 2.5x; (iii)) steady
profitable organic growth of medical membership.

Factors that could lead to a rating downgrade include: (i) a
material decline in profitability, with an EBITDA margin (with
Moody's adjustments) below 3.5%; or (ii) no improvement in adjusted
debt-to-capital from current levels (around 51.5% at Q2 2020)
and/or debt/EBITDA increasing to above 3.0x; or (iii) a 10% decline
in membership in a given year, or the unexpected loss of a major
Medicaid contract.

The following rating was assigned:

Issuer: Molina Healthcare, Inc.

  -- senior unsecured notes maturing in 2030 assigned at Ba3

Molina Healthcare, Inc. is headquartered in Long Beach, California.
Through September 30, 2020 total revenue was $14.2 billion with net
income of $639 million. As of September 30, the company reported
total equity of approximately $2.2 billion and medical membership
was approximately 4.0 million members.

Moody's insurance financial strength ratings are opinions of the
ability of insurance companies to pay punctually senior
policyholder claims and obligations.

The principal methodology used in this rating was US Health
Insurance Companies Methodology published in November 2019.


MONAKER GROUP: Amends Share Exchange Agreement with Hotplay
-----------------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by
Monaker Group, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 23, 2020, on July 23, 2020, the Company entered into (a) a
Share Exchange Agreement with HotPlay Enterprise Limited and the
stockholders of HotPlay; and (b) a Share Exchange Agreement with
certain stockholders holding shares of Axion Ventures, Inc., each
dated as of July 21, 2020.

Pursuant to the HotPlay Exchange Agreement, the HotPlay
Stockholders agreed to exchange 100% of the outstanding capital
shares of HotPlay (making HotPlay a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company following the closing of the transactions contemplated
therein) for 67.8% of the Company's Post-Closing Capitalization.
The Company's "Post-Closing Capitalization" is equal to the total
number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding following
the completion of the Exchange Agreements, and calculated by
dividing (A) the total number of shares of the Company's common
stock outstanding immediately prior to the closing of the Exchange
Agreements, by (B) 17.4%, and rounding such number up to the
nearest whole share.

Pursuant to the Axion Exchange Agreement, (a) the Axion
Stockholders agreed to exchange ordinary shares of Axion currently
equal to approximately 33.9% of the outstanding common shares of
Axion; and (b) the Axion Creditors agreed to exchange $7,757,024 in
promissory notes issued by, or other debt owed by, Axion to such
Axion Creditors, with the Company, in consideration for an
aggregate of 14.8% of the Company's Post-Closing Capitalization,
and warrants. Specifically, (1) the Axion Creditors are to receive
one share of Company common stock for each $2.00 of debt exchanged,
currently anticipated to total an aggregate of 3,878,512 shares
(based on $7,757,024 of debt to be exchanged), (2) one of the Axion
Creditors is to receive a warrant to purchase that number of shares
of Company common stock as equals the total of the debt exchanged,
divided by $4.00, currently anticipated to total warrants to
purchase 1,939,256 shares of common stock, and (3) the Axion
Shareholders are to receive that number of shares of common stock
as equals the Axion Percentage of the Post-Closing Capitalization,
less the Debt Shares, such that the total number of shares issuable
to the Axion Stockholders and Axion Creditors (without taking into
account any shares issuable upon exercise of the Creditor
Warrants), will total the Axion Percentage following the Closing.

On Oct. 28, 2020, the Company, HotPlay, and the HotPlay
Stockholders entered into a First Amendment to Share Exchange
Agreement dated and effective Oct. 23, 2020, which amended the
HotPlay Exchange Agreement to:

   (a) Extend the date the transactions contemplated by the
HotPlay
       Exchange Agreement were required to be completed by from
       Oct. 30, 2020, to Nov. 30, 2020;

   (b) Extend the date by which HotPlay was required to acquire (a)

       49% of the Class A shares of the capital stock of HotPlay
      (Thailand) Company Limited, a private company organized under

       the laws of Thailand; and (b) (i) 90.57% of the voting, and
      (ii) 95% of the economic and liquidation rights associated
       with HP Thailand through a preferred share structure, to
       Nov. 15, 2020 (previously such date was 30 days after the
       parties' entered into the HotPlay Exchange Agreement); and
  
   (c) Amend the terms of those certain convertible promissory
notes
       issued by Monaker to HotPlay in consideration for an
       aggregate of $2,000,000 of advances received from HotPlay to

       date, to allow HotPlay until Nov. 15, 2020, to deliver  
       the required audited and interim financial statements in the
     
       form required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, in

       connection with the Company's proxy statement which the
       Company will file to seek shareholder approval of the
HotPlay
       Exchange Agreement.

Also on Oct. 28, 2020, the Company, the Axion Stockholders, and
Axion Creditors entered into a First Amendment to Share Exchange
Agreement dated and effective Oct. 23, 2020, which amended the
Axion Exchange Agreement to extend the date the transactions
contemplated by the Axion Exchange Agreement were required to be
completed by from Oct. 30, 2020, to Nov. 30, 2020.

                       About Monaker Group

Headquartered in Weston, Florida, Monaker Group, Inc. --
http://www.monakergroup.com/-- is a technology-driven company
focused on delivering innovation to the alternative lodging rental
(ALR) market. The proprietary Monaker Booking (MBE) provides access
to more than 3.2 million instantly bookable vacation rental homes,
villas, chalets, apartments, condos, resort residences, and
castles. MBE offers travel distributors and agencies an industry
first: a customizable, instant-booking platform for alternative
lodging rental.

Monaker Group reported a net loss of $9.45 million for the year
ended Feb. 29, 2020.  As of Aug. 31, 2020, the Company had $9.14
million in total assets, $5.03 million in total liabilities, and
$4.11 million in total stockholders' equity.

Thayer O'Neal Company, LLC, in Sugar Land, Texas, the Company's
auditor since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated May 29, 2020, citing that the Company has an
accumulated deficit and limited financial resources.  This raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


NEW MOON: Seeks Approval to Hire BransonLaw PLLC as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
New Moon Orlando, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to employ Jeffrey S. Ainsworth
and BransonLaw, PLLC as its counsel.

The firm will render these professional services to the Debtor:

     (a) prosecute and defend any causes of action on behalf of the
Debtor; prepare, on behalf of the Debtor, all necessary
applications, motions, reports and other legal papers;

     (b) assist in the formulation of a plan of reorganization;

     (c) provide all other services of a legal nature.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Attorneys        $450
     Paralegals       $150

Prior to the commencement of this case, the Debtor paid an advance
fee of $1,165.00 for post-petition services and expenses in
connection with this case and the filing fee of $1,717.00.

The Debtor has previously paid the firm $3,835.00 on a current
basis, for services rendered and costs incurred prior to the
commencement of this case, including the preparation of the
petition, motions, and other papers.

Jeffrey S. Ainsworth, Esq., an attorney with BransonLaw, PLLC, and
Jacob D. Flentke, Esq., an attorney of Flentke Legal Consulting,
PLLC and a regular associate of BransonLaw, PLLC, disclosed in
court filings that BransonLaw, PLLC is a "disinterested person" as
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Jeffrey S. Ainsworth, Esq.
     Jacob D. Flentke, Esq.
     FLENTKE LEGAL CONSULTING, PLLC
     BRANSONLAW, PLLC
     1501 E. Concord St.
     Orlando, FL 32803
     Telephone: (407) 894-6834
     Facsimile: (407) 894-8559
     E-mail: jeff@bransonlaw.com
             jacob@bransonlaw.com
             jacob@flentkelegal.com

                       About New Moon Orlando

New Moon Orlando, LLC filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11,
Subchapter V of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
20-05204) on September 17, 2020, listing under $1 million in both
assets and liabilities. Judge Lori V. Vaughan oversees the case.
BransonLaw, PLLC, led by Jeffrey S. Ainsworth, Esq., serves as the
Debtor's counsel.


NEW YORK GRANITE: USA Granite Buying All Assets for $27K Cash
-------------------------------------------------------------
New York Granite Corp. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to authorize the bidding procedures
in connection with the sale of assets, including but not limited to
inventory, equipment, good will, telephone number of (845)
563-0513, and the business name of "New York Granite," to USA
Granite Corp. for $27,000, cash, subject to overbid.

The Debtor fabricates and installs granite and sells cabinets and
is located in New Windsor, Orange County, New York.  Its assets
consist of raw materials, a forklift, small hand tools, compressor,
a 2012 Mercedes Benz Sprinter van, as well as its customer list,
good will, telephone number and operating name of "New York
Granite."

On Sept. 28, 2020, the Debtor filed a Motion to sell its Assets to
Interstate Cabinetry, LLC for a total purchase price of $26,000.
On Oct. 8, 2020, the counsel for the Debtor was advised by
Interstate Cabinetry's counsel that the offer to purchase the
Debtor's Assets had been withdrawn.

An offer has been made by USA Granite, to purchase the Assets of
the Debtor for a total purchase price of $27,000.  The offer to
purchase said Assets of the Debtor is contained in the Offer made
by the Buyer.  The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances.

In brief, the proceeds from the sale of the Debtor's Assets would
be paid to the Debtor's secured creditor, T.D. Bank, N.A.  At the
time of the filing of the petition, the balance due to TD Bank was
approximately $507,128.  The Buyer will assume none of the Debtor's
current obligations.

The sale contemplated is for substantially all of the Debtor's
Assets.  It is anticipated that the Debtor will terminate its daily
operations upon closing of the sale of the Assets and file a
liquidating Plan of Reorganization or seek a dismissal of the
case.

The Debtor believes that the offer from the Buyer contains the best
terms that the debtor could receive for its Assets.  Further, it  
believes that the offer is fair and reasonable, particularly since
the purchaser is paying the purchase price in cash.  It is the
position ofmanagement that without a sale to the Buyer, a
liquidation sale of the Assets by TD Bank would not produce as
significant a return for TD Bank.

The Debtor proceeds by motion with respect to a sale of
substantially all of its assets due to the circumstances of the
case.

At the time and place of sale, the Debtor proposes the bidding
procedures to enable it to conduct its proposed sale.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Nov. 20, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)

     b. Deposit: 15% of the bid amount

     c. Auction: If the debtor receives a Qualified Bid by the
Bidding Deadline, an auction will be held on Nov. 23, 2020, at the
offices of the Debtor's counsel, Genova & Malin, LLP, 1136 Route 9,
Wappingers Falls, New York 12590 or at such other date, time and
place as the Debtor will notify all Qualified Bidders and the
Notice Parties entitled to attend the Auction, including remotely
by means accessible to Qualified Bidders and the Notice Parties
(such as Zoom or Webex).  There will be no Auction if there are no
Qualified Bids other than the bid of Interstate.

     d. Closing: Seven days after entry by the Court of the Order
Approving Sale

     e. Break-Up Fee: $2,000

The Debtor is not asking reduction in time ofthe notice period
required by Rule 2002.

A hearing on the Motion is set for on Nov. 10, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed at least seven days prior to the
return date of the Motion.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y4qybffx from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                  About New York Granite Corp.

New York Granite Corporation owns and operates a cabinet and
countertop store for kitchen or bath.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-36941) on December 5, 2019.  The Hon. Cecelia
G. Morris oversees the case.

In its petition, the Debtor was estimated to have under $50,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The petition
was signed by Wieslaw Piasecki, president.

The Debtor is represented by Andrea B. Malin, Esq. and Michelle L.
Trier, Esq., at Genova & Malin.


NORTHWEST CAPITAL: NHNY Buying Springfield Apartment for $12.5M
---------------------------------------------------------------
Northwest Capital Holdings, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Illinois to authorize its Real Estate
Asset Purchase Agreement with NHNY Holdings, LLC in connection with
the sale of its 220-unit apartment complex in Springfield, Illinois
for $12.5 million.

The Debtor's primary asset is the Real Property, a multi-family
residential complex on 12.77 acres of land in Springfield,
Illinois.  There are 220 units in 12 multi-family buildings, eight
two-story buildings with garden-level apartments, three two-story
buildings without garden-level apartments, and a single-story
building.  The units are 1-bedroom/1-bathroom and
2-bedroom/1.5-bathroom, and generally range from $560 to $700 in
rent.  There is also a one-story building in the center of the
complex used as a rental office and clubhouse.  The complex has
additional amenities, including an outdoor pool, tennis courts, and
a small playground area.

On Aug. 24, 2020, the Purchaser submitted a letter of intent to buy
the Property -- which is substantially all of the Debtor's assets.
Since then, the parties have negotiated the Contract.

The key terms of the Agreement and the transaction described
therein include the following:

     1. The purchase price for the Property is $12.5 million, which
will be payable through a cash component and a non-cash
component.

     2. The cash component of the purchase price will be paid an
amount sufficient to pay all creditors in full.  The cash amount
will be paid at the closing of the transaction.

     3. The non-cash consideration of the purchase price is the
difference between the amount needed to pay creditors in full and
$12.5 million.  The non-cash consideration will be in the form of
an interest in a limited liability company that will be formed and
whose members will be Jacqueline Streit, the holder of 75% of the
Debtor's equity, and the Purchaser.

     4. The Purchaser will have 45 business days to conduct due
diligence on the Property.

     5. Maurice Wider, will receive a 1.5% sales commission upon
the closing date, subject to approval of his engagement by the
Court.  Mr. Wider is a broker who introduced the Purchaser and the
Debtor.

     6. If the Purchaser elects to proceed with the transaction
upon the completion of the 45-day due diligence period, the
Purchaser will then further renovate the Property through the use
of its own funds.

     7. The Purchaser will have 90 business days to close the
transaction upon the completion of the due diligence period and if
the Purchaser fails to close the transaction in breach of the
Agreement, the renovations the Purchaser has funded and the earnest
money of $100,000, will be forfeited to the Debtor.

     8. If the Debtor elects to have a public auction for the
Property, the Purchaser will be entitled to a break-up fee of
$250,000, to the extent it is not the successful bidder.

The Debtor is selling the Assets free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests, and encumbrances.  To the best of its knowledge,
information, and belief, no entity claims an interest in the Assets
other than Midland States Bank and the Sangamon County Water
Reclamation District.  Midland's interest in the Real Property is a
lien, and the value of that lien is no more than $8,115,226, the
amount it asserted in its proof of claim (to which the Debtor has
objected).  The District asserts a claim for sewer utility charges
of $34,505, purportedly secured by liens recorded on March 16,
2020, after the Debtor filed for bankruptcy.  The sale price is
greater than the aggregate value of the purported liens on the
Property.

A hearing on the Motion is set for November 10, 2020, at 10:00 a.m.
The Motion will be presented and heard telephonically using AT&T
Teleconference, using the following information - Toll Free Number:
1-877-336-1839; Access Code: 3900709.  Objections, if any, must be
filed no later than two business days before that date.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y4lvqr9z from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                      About Northwest Capital

Northwest Capital Holdings LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor
(as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  Northwest Capital
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 20-05334) on
Feb. 27, 2020.  At the time of filing, the Debtor was estimated to
have $10 million to $50 million in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Hon. Jack B.
Schmetterer.  The Debtor's counsel is William J. Factor, Esq.


NPC INT'L: $2.75M Workers Incentives Approved Over Objections
-------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Saul of Bloomberg News reports that the federal bankruptcy
Judge David R. Jones approved up to $2.75 million in key employee
incentive payments in oral ruling Sept. 17, 2020.  The U.S. Trustee
and a group of Pizza Hut drivers both objected to the payments but
Jones overruled those objections.  

"The numbers are so relatively small that I'm comfortable being
wrong," Judge Jones said in approving the plan.

Cash payments will go to seven NPC executives; maximum total payout
of $2.75m is dependent on reaching revenue targets and the sale
price of company's assets, according to court filing.

                     About NPC International

NPC International, Inc. -- https://www.npcinternational.com/ -- is
a franchisee company with over 1,600 franchised restaurants across
two iconic brands -- Wendy's and Pizza Hut -- spanning 30 states
and the District of Columbia.

NPC International and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
20-33353) on July 1, 2020. At the time of the filing, Debtors
disclosed assets of between $1 billion and $10 billion and
liabilities of the same range.  

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, as bankruptcy
counsel; Alixpartners, LLP as financial advisor; Greenhill & Co.,
LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC as
claims, noticing and solicitation agent and administrative advisor.


NPC INT'L: Committee Says Plan Disclosures Not Clear
----------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of NPC International,
Inc., et al., filed an objection to the motion of the Debtors for
approval of their Disclosure Statement.

According to Committee, a disclosure statement must "clearly and
succinctly inform the average unsecured creditor what it is going
to get, when it is going to get it, and what contingences there are
to getting its distribution,"

The Committee points out that the Disclosure Statement fails to
provide this basic type of information to creditors, including the
value of the Debtors' business and assets that may form the basis
for a recovery to general unsecured recoveries and should be
modified as follows.

The Committee further points out that the Debtors must support
their proposed creditor treatment with a proper valuation.  While a
valuation may not ultimately be necessary if the Debtors complete a
WholeCo sale, if the Debtors seek any other alternative, creditors
are entitled to the benefit of the Debtors' valuation analysis in
casting their votes.

The Committee asserts that the Debtors' liquidation analysis must
include the value of chapter 5 avoidance actions.

The Committee complains that the Disclosure Statement must
adequately describe the assets subject to the Committee's lien
challenge. Such assets include: (i) the debtors' Franchise
Agreements; (ii) leasehold interests; (iii) commercial tort claims;
(iv) certain Debtors' unpledged common stock; (v) avoidance
actions; (vi) bank accounts that were unperfected as of the
Petition Date; (vii) a claim for unmatured interest; and (viii) any
assets held by the debtors not party to the prepetition
facilities.

Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors of NPC International, Inc., et al.:

     Eric R. Wilson
     Jason R. Adams
     Maeghan J. McLoughlin
     Sean T. Wilson
     KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP
     101 Park Avenue
     New York, New York 10178
     Tel: (212) 808-7800
     Fax: (212) 808-7897
     Email: EWilson@KelleyDrye.com
            JAdams@KelleyDrye.com
            MMcLoughlin@KelleyDrye.com
            SWilson@KelleyDrye.com

                    About NPC International

NPC International, Inc. -- https://www.npcinternational.com/ -- is
a franchisee company with over 1,600 franchised restaurants across
two iconic brands -- Wendy's and Pizza Hut -- spanning 30 states
and the District of Columbia.

NPC International and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
20-33353) on July 1, 2020. At the time of the filing, Debtors
disclosed assets of between $1 billion and $10 billion and
liabilities of the same range.  

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, as bankruptcy
counsel; Alixpartners, LLP as financial advisor; Greenhill & Co.,
LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC as
claims, noticing and solicitation agent and administrative advisor.


NPC INT'L: Gets Court Approval to Send Plan to Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Josh Saul of Bloomberg News reports that restaurant operator NPC
International Inc. won approval Oct. 30, 2020 to send its
disclosure statement and plan to creditors for voting.

The Debtors' reorganization plan has a "toggle structure,"
according to its disclosure statement.  The company will hold a
sales process to sell all or part of its Pizza Hut and Wend's
businesses.  If no sale occurs or if some assets are left unsold,
NPC will reorganize around the unsold assets.

                 About NPC International Inc.

NPC International, Inc. is a franchisee company with over 1,600
franchised restaurants across two iconic brands -- Wendy's and
Pizza Hut -- spanning 30 states and the District of Columbia. Visit
https://www.npcinternational.com for more information.

NPC International and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
20-33353) on July 1, 2020. At the time of the filing, the Debtors
disclosed assets of between $1 billion and $10 billion and
liabilities of the same range.  

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

Debtors have tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as bankruptcy
counsel, Alixpartners LLP as financial advisor, and Greenhill & Co.
LLC as investment banker. Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC is the
claims, noticing and solicitation agent and administrative
advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors in Debtors' Chapter 11 cases. Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP
and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC serve as the committee's
legal counsel and financial advisor, respectively.


OAKVIEW CROSSING: Seeks to Hire Kelley & Clements as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Oakview Crossing of Hartwell, LLC seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia to hire Kelley
& Clements LLP as its legal counsel.

The services Kelley & Clements will render are as follows:

     a. advise Debtor regarding is Chapter 11 case and provide
strategic advice on how to accomplish its goals in connection with
the prosecution of the case;

     b. advise the Debtor of its obligations, duties and rights;

     c. prepare court documents;

     d. appear in court and at any meeting with the U.S. trustee
and creditors;

     e. perform various services needed to administer the case,
including monitoring the court docket for filings and handling
inquiries from creditors;

     f. interact and communicate with the court's chambers and
Clerk's Office;

     g. prepare pleadings related to contested matters, executory
contracts and unexpired leases, asset sales, bankruptcy
plan-related issues, and claims administration and resolve
objections and other matters relating thereto; and

     h. perform all other necessary legal services.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Charles N. Kelley, Jr., Partner     $385
     Jonathan D. Clements, Partner       $250
     Tammy A. Winkler, Paralegal         $135

The Debtor made retainer payments to the firm totaling $12,000.

Kelley & Clements is a "disinterested person," as that phrase is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Charles N. Kelley, Jr., Esq.
     Kelley & Clements LLP
     PO Box 2758
     Gainesville, GA 30503
     Phone: (770) 531-0007
     Email: ckelley@kelleyclements.com

                 About Oakview Crossing of Hartwell

Oakview Crossing of Hartwell, LLC is a single asset real estate
debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Oakview Crossing of Hartwell filed its voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Ga.
Case No. 20-30720) on Oct. 4, 2020.  C. William Kidd, Debtor's
manager, signed the petition.  At the time of filing, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.


Judge James P. Smith oversees the case.  Kelley & Clements, LLP
serves as Debtor's legal counsel.


PACIFIC DRILLING: Files for Chapter 11 for 2nd Time
---------------------------------------------------
acific Drilling S.A. (NYSE: PACD) and certain of its domestic and
international subsidiaries have filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas
and have entered into a restructuring support agreement with an ad
hoc group of the largest holders of its outstanding bond debt.
This consensual financial restructuring transaction will eliminate
the Company's approximately $1.1 billion in principal amount of
outstanding bond debt through the cancellation and exchange of debt
for new equity in the reorganized Company.

The Company also announced Oct. 30, 2020 that it has repaid its $50
million first lien superpriority revolving credit agreement with
Angelo, Gordon Energy Servicer, LLC, as administrative agent and
the lenders party thereto.

With approximately $120 million of cash and cash equivalents as of
October 30, 2020, and seven of the most advanced high-specification
drillships in the world, Pacific Drilling intends to continue its
world-wide operations as usual, deliver services for existing and
prospective clients and, subject to court approval, pay all
obligations incurred during the Chapter 11 case in full. The
Company expects to emerge by year-end with access to new capital in
the form of an $80 million exit facility and with approximately
$100 million of cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet.

Since the beginning of 2020, the global health crisis caused by
COVID-19 and the resulting oil supply and demand imbalance have
caused significant disruption in world economies and markets,
including a substantial decline in the price of oil. The impact of
these market conditions on Pacific Drilling’s business has been
direct and significantly negative, rendering our current capital
structure unsustainable over the long-term.

Bernie Wolford, Chief Executive Officer, stated, "After spending
several months evaluating options for addressing our long-term
financial needs in light of challenging market and operational
conditions, we are pleased to reach agreement with an ad hoc group
of our noteholders that paves the way for an expeditious Chapter 11
restructuring process.  This restructuring is intended to enhance
our financial flexibility by eliminating our entire prepetition
debt and cash interest burden.  We expect to emerge from this
process in a stronger position to compete in today's challenging,
lower-commodity-price environment. I appreciate the ongoing support
of our employees, clients and vendors as we complete this
accelerated restructuring process. We remain committed to
delivering the safest, most efficient and reliable deepwater
drilling services in the industry."

Additional information regarding the restructuring and Chapter 11
proceedings can be found (i) on our website at
www.pacificdrilling.com/restructuring, (ii) on a website
administered by our claims agent, Prime Clerk, at
http://cases.primeclerk.com/PacificDrilling2020,or (iii) via our
dedicated restructuring information line at: +1 877-930-4314 (toll
free) or +1 347-897-4073 (international).

                          *     *     *

David Wethe and Allison McNeely of Bloomberg News report that
Pacific Drilling SA filed for bankruptcy for the second time in
three years after a global pandemic crushed oil demand in an
industry already drowning from a glut of offshore gear.

                   About Pacific Drilling

Pacific Drilling (NYSE: PACD) provides deepwater drilling services.
Pacific Drilling's fleet of seven drillships represents one of the
youngest and most technologically advanced fleets in the world.  On
the Web: http://www.pacificdrilling.com/

On Nov. 12, 2017, Pacific Drilling S.A. along with affiliates each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
17-13193).  In that case, Pacific tapped Togut, Segal & Segal LLP
as counsel; Evercore Partners International LLP as investment
banker; and AlixPartners, LLP, as restructuring advisor.  

Pacific Drilling S.A. and its affiliates returned to Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-35212) on Oct. 30,
2020, to seek approval of a bankruptcy-exit plan that will cut debt
by $1.1 billion.

As of June 30, 2020, Pacific Drilling had $2,166,943,000 in assets
and $1,142,431,000 in liabilities.

In the present case, Greenhill & Co. is acting as financial advisor
to the Debtors, Latham & Watkins LLP and Jones Walker LLP are
serving as legal counsel, and AlixPartners is acting as
restructuring advisor to Pacific Drilling in connection with the
restructuring.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.

Houlihan Lokey is acting as financial advisor and Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP is acting as legal advisor to the noteholders.


PENNSYLVANIA REIT: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust
             2005 Market Street, Suite 1000
             Philadelphia, PA 19103

Business Description:     PREIT is a publicly traded real estate
                          investment trust, specializing in the
                          ownership and management of
                          differentiated shopping malls.
                          Headquartered in Philadelphia,
                          Pennsylvania, the Company owns and
                          operates more than 20 million square
                          feet of retail space in the eastern half
                          of the United States, with a
                          concentration in the Mid-Atlantic
                          region.  Visit www.preit.com for more
                          information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2020

Court:                    United States Bankruptcy Court
                          District of Delaware

Sixty-nine affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                              Case No.
    ------                                              --------
    Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust           20-12737
    Bala Cynwyd Associates, L.P.                        20-12761
    Moorestown Mall LLC                                 20-12791
    Plymouth Ground Associates LLC                      20-12769
    Plymouth Ground Associates, LP                      20-12771
    PR AEKI Plymouth LLC                                20-12775
    PR AEKI Plymouth, L.P.                              20-12777
    PR BVM LLC                                          20-12796
    PR Capital City Limited Partnership                 20-12776
    PR Capital City LLC                                 20-12774
    PR CC I LLC                                         20-12778
    PR CC II LLC                                        20-12772
    PR CC Limited Partnership                           20-12781
    PR Cherry Hill Office GP, LLC                       20-12759
    PR Cumberland Outparcel LLC                         20-12744
    PR Exton Limited Partnership                        20-12762
    PR Exton LLC                                        20-12756
    PR Exton Outparcel GP, LLC                          20-12755
    PR Exton Outparcel Holdings, LP                     20-12758
    PR Exton Outparcel Limited Partnership              20-12760
    PR Exton Square Property L.P.                       20-12773
    PR Fin Delaware, LLC                                20-12739
    PR Financing I LLC                                  20-12757
    PR Financing II LLC                                 20-12754
    PR Financing Limited Partnership                    20-12770
    PR Gainesville Limited Partnership                  20-12749
    PR Gainesville LLC                                  20-12779
    PR GV LLC                                           20-12742
    PR GV LP                                            20-12747
    PR Hyattsville LLC                                  20-12784
    PR Jacksonville Limited Partnership                 20-12768
    PR Jacksonville LLC                                 20-12765
    PR JK LLC                                           20-12763
    PR Magnolia LLC                                     20-12753
    PR Monroe Old Trail Holdings, L.P.                  20-12803
    PR Monroe Old Trail Holdings, LLC                   20-12802
    PR Monroe Old Trail Limited Partnership             20-12801
    PR Monroe Old Trail, LLC                            20-12800
    PR Moorestown Anchor-L&T, LLC                       20-12743
    PR Moorestown Anchor-M LLC                          20-12792
    PR Moorestown Limited Partnership                   20-12790
    PR Moorestown LLC                                   20-12786
    PR Plymouth Anchor-M, L.P.                          20-12787
    PR Plymouth Anchor-M, LLC                           20-12785
    PR Plymouth Meeting Associates PC LP                20-12795
    PR Plymouth Meeting Limited Partnership             20-12783
    PR Plymouth Meeting LLC                             20-12780
    PR PM PC Associates LLC                             20-12793
    PR PM PC Associates LP                              20-12794
    PR Prince George's Plaza LLC                        20-12782
    PR Springfield Town Center LLC                      20-12741
    PR Sunrise Outparcel 2, LLC                         20-12799
    PR Swedes Square LLC                                20-12750
    PR TP LLC                                           20-12746
    PR TP LP                                            20-12751
    PR Valley Anchor-M, L.P.                            20-12789
    PR Valley Anchor-S, LLC                             20-12748
    PR Valley Anchor-M, LLC                             20-12788
    PR Valley Limited Partnership                       20-12766
    PR Valley LLC                                       20-12764
    PR Valley Solar LLC                                 20-12797
    PR Valley View Anchor-M Limited Partnership         20-12804
    PR Valley View Anchor-M, LLC                        20-12752
    PR Valley View OP-DSG/CEC, LLC                      20-12740
    PR Woodland Anchor-S, LLC                           20-12745
    PREIT Associates, L.P.                              20-12736
    PREIT-RUBIN OP, Inc.                                20-12798
    PREIT-RUBIN, Inc.                                   20-12738
    XGP LLC                                             20-12767

Judge:                    Hon. Karen B. Owens

Debtors'
General
Bankruptcy
Counsel:                   R. Craig Martin, Esq.
                           Stuart M. Brown, Esq.
                           Aaron S. Applebaum, Esq.
                           DLA PIPER LLP (US)
                           1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2100
                           Wilmington, DE 19801
                           Tel:(302) 468-5700
                           Fax:(302) 394-2341
                           Email: craig.martin@us.dlapiper.com
                                  stuart.brown@us.dlapiper.com
                                  aaron.applebaum@us.dlapiper.com

                             - and -

                           Richard A. Chesley, Esq.
                           Daniel M. Simon, Esq.
                           Oksana Koltko Rosaluk, Esq.
                           David E. Avraham, Esq.
                           Tara Nair, Esq.
                           444 West Lake Street, Suite 900
                           Chicago, Illinois 60606
                           Tel: (312) 368-4000
                           Fax: (312) 236-7516
                           Email: richard.chesley@us.dlapiper.com
                                  daniel.simon@us.dlapiper.com
                              oksana.koltkorosaluk@us.dlapiper.com
                                  david.avraham@us.dlapiper.com
                                  tara.nair@us.dlapiper.com

Debtors'
Investment
Banker:                    PJT PARTNERS LP

Debtors'
Claims &
Notice
Agent:                     PRIME CLERK LLC
                     https://cases.primeclerk.com/preit/Home-Index

Total Assets as of June 30, 2020: $2,375,550,000

Total Debts as of June 30, 2020: $2,033,381,000

The petitions were signed by Lisa Most, executive VP/general
counsel.

A copy of Pennsylvania Real Estate's petition is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/TJM2FPY/Pennsylvania_Real_Estate_Investment__debke-20-12737__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Wells Fargo Bank,               Unsecured Bank     $668,454,545
National Association                    Loan
(Agent)                             (Revolver/TL
10 South Wacker Drive,            Credit Agreement)
32nd Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Brandon Barry
Tel: (312) 827-1525
E-mail: brandon.barry@wellsfargo.com

2. Wells Fargo Bank,                   Unsecured      $244,545,454
National Association                   Bank Loan
(Agent)                             (Seven Year Term
10 South Wacker Drive,                 Agreement)
32nd Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Brandon Barry
Tel: (312) 827-1525
E-mail: brandon.barry@wellsfargo.com

3. Service Management                    Trade          $1,122,572
Systems, Inc.
7135 Charlotte Pike
Suite 100
Nashville, TN 37209
Scott Born, President
Tel: (615) 850-5454
Fax: (615) 399-1438
E-mail: info@smsholdings.com

4. Abercrombie & Fitch               Lease Payment        $383,155
Stores, Inc.
P.O. Box 182539
Columbus, OH 43218
Gregory J. Henchel,
General Counsel
Tel: (614) 283-6500
E-mail: abercrombie@abercrombie.com
HollisterCo@hollisterco.com

5. Carter's                          Lease Payment        $374,976
3438 Peachtree Toad,
N.E., Suite 1800
Atlanta, GA 30326
Deborah Coles
Tel: (678) 791-7796
Email: Deborah.coles@carters.com

6. Lower Allen Township                   Tax             $371,703
2233 Gettysburg Road
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Thomas G. Vernau, Jr.,
Township Manager
Tel: (717) 975-7575
Fax: (615) 399-1438

7. Metroplex West                    Lease Payment        $341,128
Associates
630 Sentry Parkway
Suite 300
Blue Bell, PA 19422
Tel: (610) 260-9600
Fax: (610) 260-0269
E-mail: info@goldenberggroup.com
leasing@goldenberggroup.com

8. Collector of Taxes                     Tax             $265,014
P.O. Box 709
Scranton, PA 18501
Tel: (570) 963-6756
Fax: (570) 963-6425

9. The Goodyear Tire &                   Trade            $200,000
Rubber Company
200 Innovation Way
Akron, OH 44316-0001
David E. Phillips, General
Counsel
Tel: (330) 796-2121
Fax: (330) 796-2222

10. Sajo Construction                    Trade            $139,454
1320 Graham Blvd.
Montreal, Quebec
Canada H2P 3C8
Tel: (402) 426-1880
Fax: (514) 389-8622
E-mail: workwithuseurope@sajo.com
workwithus@sajo.com

11. Champs Sports                        Trade            $116,000
330 West 34th Street
New York, NY 10001
Richard Johnson, CEO
Tel: (212) 720-3700
Tel: (941) 748-0577
E-mail: mediarelations@footlocker.com

12. Total Maintenance                    Trade            $115,432
Management
P.O. Box 643774
Cincinnati, OH 45264
Keith Wolken
Tel: (615)-850-5454
E-mail: kwolken@smsholdings.com

13. Fluidics Inc.                        Trade             $93,590
9815 Roosevelt Blvd
Suite A
Philadelphia, PA 19114
Robert K. Baranowski, President
Tel: (215) 671-7900
Fax: (215) 671.0055
E-mail: sales@fluidics.com

14. Aspire Technology                    Trade             $84,759
Partners, LLC
P.O. Box 789172
Philadelphia, PA 19178
Derek Megargel
Tel: (732) 847-9600
E-mail: dmegargel@aspiretransforms.com

15. Constellation NewEnergy             Utility            $71,699
P.O. Box 4640
Carol Stream, IL 60197
Joe Falci
Tel: (513) 793-0185
E-mail: joseph.falci@constellation.com

16. Rieth-Riley Construction              Trade            $69,174
Co., Inc.
2100 Chicago Drive, S.W.
Wyoming, MI 49519
Ryan Craven
Tel: (616) 248-0920
Fax: (616) 248-0928

17. Bayview Associates                Lease Payment        $66,666
185 N.W. Spanish River
Blvd., Suite 100
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Jeffrey Sandelman
Tel: (561) 620-9200
Fax: (561) 955-9921
E-mail: jsandelman@kinproperties.com

18. Village Green Property Inc.       Lease Payment        $65,333
187 Gallup Road
Princeton, NJ 08540
Irene Sanz
Tel: (609) 856-9773
E-mail: irsanz@mac.com

19. Wolfe Scott Associates Inc.            Trade           $64,022
910 East Main Street, Suite 200
Norristown, PA 19401
Lee P. Wolfe
Tel: (215) 545-1272
E-mail: information@wolfescott.com

20. Granite Telecommunications LLC         Trade           $57,414
P.O. Box 983199
Boston, MA 02298
Michael Galvin
Tel: (617) 745-5168
E-mail: mgalvin@granitenet.com

21. PSE&G                                  Trade           $52,102
P.O. Box 14444
New Brunswick, NJ 08906
Tamara L. Linde, General
Counsel
Tel: (973) 430-8058
Fax: (973) 430-5983
E-mail: tamara.linde@pseg.com

22. MSC Retail, Inc.                    Professional       $51,395
1845 Walnut Street                        Services
Suite 600
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Tel: (215) 568-2600

23. CallisonRTKL Inc.                       Trade          $51,024
P.O. Box 402336
Atlanta, GA 30384
Julie Martin, Counsel
Tel: (206) 906-5194
Email: Julie.Martin@crtkl.com

24. CBRE, Inc.                          Professional       $48,940
P.O. Box 848844                           Services
Los Angeles, CA 90084
Lewis C. Horne
Tel: (215) 613-3333
E-mail: lew.horne@cbre.com

25. Green Street Advisors               Professional       $47,000
660 Newport Center                        Services
Drive, Suite 800
Newport Beach, CA
92660
Katie Clemons
Tel: (949) 640-8780
E-mail: kclemons@greenstreet.com

26. Reliable Contracting Co., Inc.      Professional       $46,054
2410 Evergreen Road, Suite 200            Services
Gambills, MD 21054
Tony Diferdinando Jr.
Tel: (410) 987-0313
E-mail: tonyd@reliablecontracting.com

27. Lincoln Construction                Professional       $34,343
Corporation                               Services
117 N. Bailey Lane
Purcellville, VA 20132
Lin Sutphin, President
Tel: (703) 450-1200
Fax: (703) 450-2003
Email: lin@lc-corp.com

28. Donnelley Financial LLC             Professional       $29,620
P.O. Box 531832                           Services
Atlanta, GA 30353
Jennifer B. Reiners, General Counsel
Tel: (800) 823-5304

29. O'Melveny & Myers LLP               Professional       $28,786
400 South Hope Street                     Services
18th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Rachel Chan
Tel: (213) 430-6000
Fax: (213) 430-6407
E-mail: rchan@omm.com

30. Conner Strong &                      Professional      $26,599
Buckelew Companies, LLC                    Services
P.O. Box 989
Marlton, NJ 08053
Heather A. Steinmiller,
General Counsel
Tel: (877) 861-3220
Email: hsteinmiller@connerstrong.com


PETER CHARLES: Gets Court Approval to Hire Bold Accounting
----------------------------------------------------------
Peter Charles Moore American Legion Post 910, Inc. received
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Middle District of
Pennsylvania to hire Bold Accounting Services, LLC as its
accountant.

Bold Accounting will prepare the annual income tax returns for the
Debtor.  

The firm will be compensated based on the prevailing flat rates. At
this time, the flat rate for the preparation of the annual 990 Form
is $600.

Bold Accounting does not represent an interest adverse to the
estate of the Debtor in the matters upon which it is to be
employed, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Larry Rabold, CPA
     Bold Accounting Services LLC
     129 W Lincoln Ave.
     Myerstown, PA 17067
     Phone: +1 717-866-7311

               About Peter Charles Moore American
                       Legion Post 910 Inc.

Peter Charles Moore American Legion Post 910, Inc. sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa.
Case No. 20-00451) on Feb. 7, 2020, listing under $1 million in
both assets and liabilities.  Judge Henry W. Van Eck oversees the
case.  Lisa A. Rynard, Esq., at Purcell, Krug & Haller, is the
Debtor's legal counsel.  


PIZZAEXPRESS FINANCING: Seeks US Recognition of UK Restructuring
----------------------------------------------------------------
PizzaExpress Financing 2 PLC filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy in
Texas.  

PizzaExpress Financing 2 Plc is a unit of UK chain PizzaExpress.
PizzaExpress Financing 2 sought Chapter 15 bankruptcy to seek
recognition of the chain's restructuring proceedings in the UK.

A hearing on the relief requested in the verified petition for U.S.
recognition is scheduled for Nov. 3, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. (prevailing
Central  Time), in Courtroom 404 of the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas, 4th floor, 515 Rusk
Street, Houston, Texas 77002.

PizzaExpress Financing's U.S. counsel:

          Matthew D Cavenaugh
          Jackson Walker LLP
          Tel: 713-752-4200
          E-mail: mcavenaugh@jw.com

                 About PizzaExpress Financing 2

Founded in 1965 and headquartered in London, PizzaExpress is the
leading operator in the UK casual dining market measured by number
of restaurants. As at September 2019 it operated 482 sites in the
UK and Ireland as well as around 150 international sites,
principally in China. For the 52 weeks period ending 29 September
2019, the company reported revenues of GBP551 million and EBITDA of
GBP75.6 million. PizzaExpress was acquired by Hony Capital in a
GBP895 million LBO in August 2014.

Covid-19 lockdown measures forced it to close most of its
restaurants earlier this 2020.  But the iconic restaurant chain had
been struggling even before the pandemic as changing dining trends
reduced demand for its pizzas, and as  efforts to expand its
business outside the U.K. stretched its balance sheet.

On 30 September 2020, the English High Court granted PizzaExpress
Financing 2 plc ("Company" or "Pizza Express") permission to
proceed to the creditors' meeting stage of its proposed Part 26A
Restructuring Plan. Pizza Express is the second company (after
Virgin Atlantic Airways[1]) to use the new Restructuring Plan under
Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006.

PizzaExpress Financing 2 Plc filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-34868) on Oct. 4, 2020 to seek
recognition of the British restaurant chain's restructuring in the
U.K.  Judge Marvin Isgur is the case judge.


PORTOFINO TOWERS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
Portofino Towers 1002, LLC, according to court dockets.
    
                    About Portofino Towers 1002

Portofino Towers 1002 owns a condo at 300 S Pointe Drive, Unit
1002, Miami Beach, Fla.
  
Portofino Towers 1002 sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-20446) on Sept. 27,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Jay A. Cristol oversees the case.

Joel M. Aresty, P.A. serves as Debtor's legal counsel.


PREMIER ON 5TH: Avant Garde Buying All Assets for $502K
-------------------------------------------------------
Premier on 5th, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to authorize the sale of substantially all
assets to Avant Garde Design Group, Inc. for $502,000 plus a 12%
buyer's premium, in accordance with the terms of the Debtor's Plan
of Liquidation, as amended by the Order Approving Disclosure
Statement on a Final Basis and Confirming Chapter 11 Plan entered
on June 22, 2020 and the Purchase Agreement.

The Debtor determined that it would be in the best interests of
creditors and the estate to maximize value through a sale of the
Property under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.  In connection
with the proposed transaction, the Debtor filed (1) a motion to
approve procedures for the submission and consideration of bids;
and (2) a liquidation plan, which provides for the sale of the
Property, and the distribution of the sale proceeds to creditors.
By Order entered on July 21, 2020, the Court approved the Bid
Procedures.

The auction contemplated under the Bid Procedures initially ended
on Sept. 2, 2020, but the deadline was extended until Oct. 7, 2020
pursuant to the Court's order, with Avant Garde making the highest
and best bid.  Secured Creditor, Rubin Peacock was registered as a
backup bidder.

The Debtor and Avant Garde entered into their Purchase Agreement,
which provides for the sale by the Debtor, and the purchase by the
Purchaser, of the Property, for a price in the amount of $502,000
plus a 12% buyer's premium.  The Debtor asks the entry of an order
authorizing the sale of the Property to the Purchaser on the terms
set forth in the Plan, the Bid Procedures Order, and the Purchase
Agreement, free and clear of any and all Encumbrances.  The
Encumbrances of any creditors or claimants of any kind whatsoever
will attach to the sale proceeds.

In the Debtor's business judgment, selling the Property is in the
best interest of the creditors and the estate. The Bid Procedures
have helped ensure that the price obtained was fair and reasonable.
Moreover, the sale proceeds will pay allowed claims in accordance
with their respective priorities, as more particularly set forth in
the Plan.

Because the Property will be sold and transferred under the Plan,
the Debtor asks that all federal, state and local governmental
agencies or departments be directed to accept and abide by the
terms of the transfer-tax exemption in connection with any transfer
of the Property, including accepting any and all documents and
instruments necessary and appropriate to consummate the
transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement.

At the hearing on the Motion, the Debtor will ask that the Court
enters an order waiving the 14-day stay set forth in Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(g) and providing that the order granting the Motion be
immediately enforceable and that the closing under the Plan and the
Purchase Agreement may occur immediately.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y62lqjl9 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                  About Premier on 5th, LLC

Premier on 5th, LLC, owns in fee simple a real property in
Sarasota, Fla.

Premier on 5th sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-12098) on Dec. 27, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $1,195,000 in assets and
$494,132 in liabilities.  Timothy W. Gensmer, P.A., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


PRO MACH: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed the ratings outlook for Pro Mach
Group, Inc. to stable from negative. At the same time, Moody's
affirmed the company's B3 corporate family rating and B3-PD
probability of default rating, and the B2 first lien senior secured
rating.

"The change in outlook to stable reflects Pro Mach's strengthened
liquidity owing to strong free cash flow generation in 2020 despite
pandemic-related volatility in the second quarter of 2020", says
Shirley Singh, Moody's lead analyst for the company.

Notwithstanding the negative effects from the pandemic and
debt-financed acquisitions, Pro Mach's credit quality has largely
remained intact with adjusted debt-to-EBITDA (leverage; on pro
forma basis) of 6.7x as of June 2020. Moody's expects the company's
orders intake and backlog position will drive modest earnings
improvement in second half of the year, further reducing leverage
to below 6.5x by the end of 2021. While the risk of contract delays
and ensuing volatility remains high, Moody's believes that the
company's current credit metrics and bolstered liquidity provides
sufficient flexibility to withstand current market conditions, even
if demand slows.

The following rating actions were taken:

Affirmations:

Issuer: Pro Mach Group, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Pro Mach Group, Inc.

  Outlook, Changed To Stable From Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Pro Mach's B3 CFR broadly reflects the company's elevated leverage
in excess of 6.5x and its rapidly expanding scale in a fragmented
packaging equipment industry as the company continues to undertake
an aggressive growth strategy. Demand for Pro Mach's products
exhibit volatility and are cyclical in nature. However, the
company's diversified product offerings, high margin aftermarket
business supporting its large installed base and exposure to food &
beverage and pharmaceutical end-markets somewhat mitigates the risk
associated with demand volatility. Also, the low capital
requirements inherent in the company's assembly-based business
model provides ongoing support to cash flow generation.
Nevertheless, the rating is constrained by Pro Mach's financial
sponsor ownership by Leonard Green & Partners and ensuing
aggressive financial policy by which it is governed, exposes the
company to future leveraging events such as debt-financed
acquisitions and shareholders dividends.

The stable ratings outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Pro
Mach will largely preserve its profitability, cash generation and
key credit metrics in 2020 and 2021, notwithstanding difficult
market conditions. Moody's also expects that the company will
maintain good liquidity over the next 12-18 months.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

The ratings could be downgraded if earnings from the acquisitions
fall short of expectations, or the company's organic growth and
EBITDA margins decline and thereby impose strain on the balance
sheet and associated financial risk. This could be evidenced if
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA is sustained above 7.5x, EBITA-to-interest
falls below 1.0x, or liquidity deteriorates.

Conversely, the ratings could be upgraded if the company sustains
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA below 6.0x, EBITA-to-interest above 2.0
times and FCF-to-debt above 5%.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Manufacturing
Methodology published in March 2020.

Headquartered in Covington, Kentucky, Pro Mach Group, Inc.
manufactures a broad range of packaging equipment and related
aftermarket parts and services for a number of industries including
the food, beverage, household goods and pharmaceutical industries.
Pro Mach is owned by Leonard Green & Partners. Pro forma for the
recent acquisitions, Pro Mach's revenue for the twelve months ended
June 2020 is estimated to have been $1.2 billion.


PS OF DENVER: Hires Columbia Consulting as Financial Consultant
---------------------------------------------------------------
PS Of Denver, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Colorado to employ Columbia Consulting Group,
PLLC, as financial consultant.

The firm will render these services to the Debtor:

     (a) Assist in securing and closing debtor-in-possession
financing;

     (b) Negotiate with the Debtor's lenders, creditors or counsel
for creditors;

     (c) Prepare projections and assist with structuring a Plan of
Reorganization;

     (d) Assist with the preparation and review of the Debtor's
Schedules and Monthly Operating Reports;

     (e) Provide expert testimony, if necessary; and

     (f) Other financial and accounting consulting services that
may be required.

The firm has requested a retainer of $5,000 for its services, which
is subject to Court approval.

The professionals' hourly rates for the firm's services are as
follows:

     Jeffery Worley                              $300
     Partners                             $250 - $275
     Controller and Accounting support     $75 - $175

Jeffrey A. Worley, founder of Columbia Consulting Group, PLLC,
disclosed in court filings that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Jeffrey A. Worley
     COLUMBIA CONSULTING GROUP, PLLC
     6101 Long Prairie Road, Suite 744, MB 17
     Flower Mound, TX 75028
     Telephone: (972) 809-6393
     E-mail: jworley@ccgpllc.net

                        About PS Of Denver

PS Of Denver, Inc., a/k/a Prosource of Denver, Inc., is a supplier
of flooring, cabinets, and counter tops.

PS Of Denver, Inc. filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No.
20-16375) on Sep. 25, 2020. The petition was signed by Brett C.
Martin, president. At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $1
million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities. Judge Thomas
B. McNamara oversees the case. The Debtor tapped K. Jamie Buechler,
Esq. at Buechler Law Office, L.L.C. as counsel and Columbia
Consulting Group, PLLC, as financial consultant.


PSYCHAMERICA BEHAVIORAL: Nov. 17 Hearing on Amended Plan Set
------------------------------------------------------------
Psychamerica Behavioral Services LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, an
Amended Disclosure Statement and Amended Plan.

On September 10, 2020, Judge Karen S. Jennemann conditionally
approved the Amended Disclosure Statement and ordered that:

  * November 17, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom A, Sixth Floor, of
the United States Bankruptcy Court, 400 West Washington Street,
Orlando, Florida is the hearing by video via ZOOM to consider the
amended disclosure statement and to conduct a confirmation
hearing.

  * Creditors and other parties in interest shall file with the
clerk their written acceptances or rejections of the plan (ballots)
no later than seven days before the date of the Confirmation
Hearing.

  * Any party objecting to the amended disclosure statement or
confirmation of the amended plan shall file its objection no later
than seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

  * The Debtor's counsel shall file a ballot tabulation no later
than two days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

A full-text copy of the order dated September 10, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y3klvmep from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

             About Psychamerica Behavioral Services

Psychamerica Behavioral Services LLC is a mental health service
provider in Central Florida doing business as Big Bear Behavioral
Health.  Psychamerica Behavioral Services sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
19-07902) on Dec. 2, 2019.  In the petition signed by Max R.
Magnasco, managing member, the Debtor was estimated to have assets
under $50,000 and liabilities under $1 million.  The Debtor is
represented by Aldo G. Bartolone, Jr., Esq. at Bartolone Law, PLLC.


PSYCHAMERICA BEHAVIORAL: Says Plan Changes Required Resolicitation
------------------------------------------------------------------
Psychamerica Behavioral Services LLC d/b/a Big Bear Behavioral
Health, on Sept. 7, 2020, filed a motion to continue the hearing to
consider confirmation of its Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor filed an Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and
Amended Disclosure Statement on September 7, 2020, which materially
alter the classes and treatment of classes in the plan.

Due to financial changes in the Debtor, the treatment of the Class
3 unsecured claims changed significantly. Due to the significant
amount of capital contributed by the principals, the amount of
their cash infusion on the Effective Date shall be reduced to
$15,000.  However, the Debtor shall contribute $20,000 from its
operations.

The Debtor believes that the material changes in the plan will
require re-solicitation of the Plan and Disclosure Statement.

Attorney for Debtor:

     ALDO G. BARTOLONE, JR.
     BARTOLONE LAW, PLLC
     1030 N. Orange Ave., Suite 300
     Orlando, Florida 32801
     Telephone: (407) 294-4440
     Facsimile: (407) 287-5544
     E-mail: aldo@bartolonelaw.com

           About Psychamerica Behavioral Services

Psychamerica Behavioral Services LLC is a mental health service
provider in Central Florida doing business as Big Bear Behavioral
Health. Psychamerica Behavioral Services sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
19-07902) on Dec. 2, 2019.  In the petition signed by Max R.
Magnasco, managing member, the Debtor was estimated to have assets
under $50,000 and liabilities under $1 million.  The Debtor is
represented by Aldo G. Bartolone, Jr., Esq. at Bartolone Law, PLLC.


PSYCHAMERICA BEHAVIORAL: Unsecureds Payout Hiked to 29.1% in Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Psychamerica Behavioral Services LLC submitted an Amended Plan and
a corresponding Disclosure Statement.

According to the Amended Disclosure Statement, Class 3 General
Unsecured Claims are now projected to total $120,235.  In full
satisfaction of the Class 3 Allowed Unsecured Claims, on the
Effective Date, the total sum of $35,000 will be paid to the
Holders of Class 3 Allowed Unsecured Claims on a Pro Rata basis.
Creditors are projected to recover 29.1% of their claims.

The prior iteration of the Disclosure Statement estimated total
unsecured claims at $142,336, with $25,000 to be distributed pro
rata to holders.

Except as explicitly set forth in this Plan, all cash in excess of
operating expenses generated from operation until the Effective
Date will be used for Plan Payments or Plan implementation.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated
September 7, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5comp7h
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Aldo G. Bartolone, Jr., Esq.
     Bartolone Law, PLLC
     1030 N. Orange Ave., Suite 300
     Orlando, Florida 32801
     Telephone: 407-294-4440
     Facsimile: 407-287-5544
     E-mail: aldo@bartolonelaw.com

              About Psychamerica Behavioral Services

Psychamerica Behavioral Services LLC is a mental health service
provider in Central Florida doing business as Big Bear Behavioral
Health. Psychamerica Behavioral Services sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
19-07902) on Dec. 2, 2019.  In the petition signed by Max R.
Magnasco, managing member, the Debtor was estimated to have assets
under $50,000 and liabilities under $1 million. The Debtor is
represented by Aldo G. Bartolone, Jr., Esq. at Bartolone Law, PLLC.


RESIDENTIAL MARKETING: Seeks to Tap Lieberman & Cohen as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Residential Marketing Concepts, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Michigan to employ
Lieberman & Cohen, PLLC as counsel.

Lieberman & Cohen will render these legal services to the Debtor:

     (a) appear and represent the Debtor at the initial meeting
with the U.S. Trustee's Office, Sec. 341 Meeting of Creditors,
Status Conferences, and any other Court hearings and meetings.

     (b) provide legal services to assist the Debtor with obtaining
a cash collateral order.

     (c) provide legal services to assist the Debtor in negotiating
with creditors and preparing the plan of reorganization.

     (d) communicate with the Debtor's creditors regarding claims;
and

     (e) any other legal assistance required by the Debtor.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Michael D. Lieberman     $325
     Steven J. Cohen          $300

On September 15, 2020, the firm received a prepetition retainer of
$5,000.00, plus the filing fee of $1,717.00. On October 1, 2020, a
payment of $1,690.00 was applied for current work done. The
retainer balance on the filing date was $3,310.00 and shall be held
in escrow pending approval of fees by the Court.

Michael D. Lieberman, an attorney of Lieberman & Cohen, PLLC,
disclosed in court filings that the firm and its attorneys are
"disinterested persons" as that term is defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Michael D. Lieberman, Esq.
     LIEBERMAN & COHEN, PLLC
     31313 Northwestern Hwy., Ste. 200
     Farmington Hills, MI 48334
     Telephone: (248) 539-5500
     Facsimile: (248) 539-5581
     E-mail: mike@lgcpllc.com
   
               About Residential Marketing Concepts

Residential Marketing Concepts, Inc. filed its voluntary petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.
Mich. Case No. 20-03216) on October 19, 2020, listing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. Judge John T. Gregg
oversees the case. Lieberman & Cohen, PLLC serves as the Debtor's
counsel.


ROBERT D. SPARKS: CH Global Buying Lubbock Property for $625K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Dial Sparks asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 6807 79th Street, Lubbock, Texas to CH Global, LLC for
$625,000, free and clear of liens.

Mr. Sparks is a resident of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas.  He
lives at the 79th Street Property.

The 79th Street Property owned and claimed by Mr. Sparks as his
homestead is more particularly described as follows, to wit: Lot
104, Papalote South, an Addition to the City of Lubbock, Lubbock
County, Texas.  

In his Schedules, Mr. Sparks has valued the 79th Street Property as
being worth $625,000.  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is believed to hold
(by assignment) a valid and perfected Deed of Trust lien on the
79th Street Property securing its claim in the amount of $235,139
(Claim #3).  

Mr. Sparks proposes to sell the 79th Street Property to CH Global
for $625,000, less the cost of an owner's policy of title
insurance, the customary and usual closing costs, and a 1.5%
commission to Wyatt Realty (the Listing Agent) and a 3% commission
to Lyons Realty (the Selling Agent).  The proposed sale is not
subject third-party financing.  Mr. Sparks has entered into a
Contract which calls for the closing of the sale on Dec. 31, 2020
through the offices of Lubbock Abstract and Title, 4505 82nd
Street, Suite 1, Lubbock, Texas.

Mr. Sparks proposes to deposit the net proceeds of the sale in his
separate Debtor-in-Possession account and into which the previous
sales of the Rundell Place and the State Line Place have been
deposited, said proceeds to be disbursed after Motion and Order by
the Court.  

After notice and hearing, Mr. Sparks prays that the Motion be
granted, and that the Court issues an Order granting the proposed
sale according to the terms and conditions set forth and grants
such other and further relief to which he may show himself justly
entitled.  

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 18, 2020 at 1:30 p.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date of
service.

Robert Dial Sparks sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 20-50079) on May 1, 2020.  The Debtor tapped Byrn R. Bass,
Jr., Esq., as counsel.


ROSEGOLD HOTELS: Addresses West Town Objection to Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------
Rosegold Hotels LLC filed a first supplement to the Amended
Disclosure Statement for its Plan of Reorganization to respond to
objections propounded by West Town Bank regarding the treatment of
Professional Fee Administrative Expenses and the Class 2 Secured
Claims of Jules Slim set forth in Debtor's Amended Disclosure
Statement.

ARTICLE IV

4.01 Treatment of Professional Fee Administrative Claims. All
persons that are awarded compensation or reimbursement of expenses
by the Bankruptcy Court in accordance with sections 330 or 331 of
the Bankruptcy Code or entitled to the priorities established
pursuant to sections 503(b)(2), 503(b)(3), 503(b)(4), or 503(b)(5)
of the Bankruptcy Code, shall be paid in full, in Cash, the amounts
allowed by the Bankruptcy Court on or as soon as reasonably
practicable following the later of the Effective Date or the date
on which the order allowing such Claim becomes a Final Order, or
upon such other terms as may be mutually agreed upon between such
holder of an Allowed Professional Fee Claim and the Reorganized
Debtor. Professional Fee Administrative
Claimants must file their Claims within 60 days of the Effective
Date or their Claims shall be forever barred. The Administrative
expenses should not exceed the existing retainer for the case by
more than $5,000 and post-petition expenses are all current.
Counsel for the Debtor is in possession of a retainer of $21,243.00
to cover professional fees and is only projecting to exceed the
retainer by $5,000.00 if at all.

ARTICLE V

5.01 Treatment of Class 2 Secured Claims of Jules Slim: Jules Slim
is an attorney who worked on the claims against the contractor that
the Debtor retained to work on the property improvement plan and
then who ran off with the Debtor's money to the tune of over
$500,000.00. Mr. Slim worked on a contingency fee up to $80,000.00
plus costs. Jules Slim was paid a portion of his fees prepetition
for handling this matter but Debtor believes he is still owed fees
and he has purportedly filed a lien against the same collateral on
which West Town Bank has asserted a security interest to allegedly
perfect his claim. However, Slim has not filed a proof of claim
and, to date, it is West Town Bank's contention that neither Debtor
or Slim have provided evidence of a valid claim against West Town
Bank's collateral or a valid unsecured claim. Debtor believes Slim
is owed approximately $3,500.00 for time and costs, and that this
amount is secured by a UCC filing. Debtor also believes that Slim
still has an open engagement for this project should the contractor
ever surface again so Rosegold can pursue the claim against the
contractor. West Town Bank disputes the existence, nature, extent,
validity and priority of Slims' alleged claim and is of the opinion
that the claim should not be included in the Disclosure Statement
or Plan. The Debtor disagrees. West Town Bank and Debtor have
agreed that the priority, validity and extent of Slim's alleged
claim and the purported lien can be litigated though an objection
to confirmation of the Plan. In the event that this claim becomes a
valid unsecured claim, this claim will be paid in the Class 6
unsecured class of creditors. In the event that the Court
determines that it is not a valid secured or unsecured claim, it
will not be accorded any treatment under the Plan. The Debtor did
not oppose Slim's request to have a lien claim to secure repayment
of his fees. West Town Bank submits that Mr. Slim is not entitled
to any treatment under the Plan.

A copy of the Supplement is available at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/2V3XDNQ/Rosegold_Hotels_LLC__txebke-20-40502__0089.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     Joyce W. Lindauer
     Kerry S. Alleyne
     Guy H. Holman
     Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC
     1412 Main Street, Suite 500
     Dallas, Texas 75202
     Telephone: (972) 503-4033
     Facsimile: (972) 503-4034

                  About Rosegold Hotels LLC

Rosegold Hotels LLC, d/b/a Holiday Inn Express Eunice, is a
privately held company in the traveler accommodation industry.  It
filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No.
20-40502) on Feb. 19, 2020.  In the petition signed by Rukshanda
Hasham, managing member, the Debtor was estimated to have between
$1 million and $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  Joyce
W. Lindauer, Esq., Attorney at Law & Mediator, represents the
Debtor.


ROSEHILL RESOURCES: Joint Prepackaged Plan Confirmed by Judge
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge David R. Jones has entered findings of fact, conclusions of
law and order approving Disclosure Statement and confirming Joint
Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Rosehill Resources
Inc., and its Debtor Affiliates.

The Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code and thereby satisfies Section 1129(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The Plan, including the various documents and agreements set forth
in the Plan Supplement, provides adequate and proper means for the
implementation of the Plan, thereby satisfying Section 1123(a)(5)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Debtors have proposed the Plan, the Plan Supplement, and the
other Restructuring Documents in good faith and not by any means
forbidden by law, thereby satisfying Section 1129(a)(3) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The Plan's classification, indemnification, exculpation, release,
and injunction provisions have been negotiated in good faith and at
arm’s length, are consistent with sections 105, 1122, 1123(b)(6),
1123(b)(3)(A), 1129, and 1142 of the Bankruptcy Code, and are each
integral to the Plan, supported by valuable consideration, and
necessary for the Debtors' successful reorganization.

A full-text copy of the order dated August 28, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/yy2nks6x from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

                     About Rosehill Resources

Rosehill Resources Inc., is an independent oil and natural gas
company, focuses on the acquisition, exploration, development, and
production of unconventional oil and associated liquids-rich
natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin. The company was founded
in 2015 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.  Rosehill Resources
Inc. is a subsidiary of Tema Oil & Gas Company.

Rosehill Resources Inc. and its affiliate Rosehill Operating
Company, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead
Case No. 20-33695 and 20-33696) on July 26, 2020.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Debtors disclosed $872,512,000 in assets
and $496,370,000 in liabilities.

The Hon. David R. Jones is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped tapped GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP, as co-bankruptcy counsel; OPPORTUNE
LLP as financial advisor; and JEFFERIES LLC as investment banker.
EPIQ CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC, is the claims agent.


ROYAL ALICE: Bankruptcy Court Appoints Chapter 11 Trustee
---------------------------------------------------------
In the bankruptcy case captioned IN RE: ROYAL ALICE PROPERTIES,
LLC, CHAPTER 11, SECTION A, DEBTOR, Case No. 19-12337 (Bankr E.D.
La.), Bankruptcy Judge Meredith S. Grabill granted in part and
denied in part the United States Trustee’s motion to convert the
case to chapter 7 or in the alternative, appoint a Chapter 11
Trustee; granted Arrowhead Capital Finance, Ltd.'s motion for
appointment of a Trustee for the Debtor's estate; denied without
prejudice Debtor Alice Properties' motion to obtain post-petition
financing (DIP motion); disapproved without prejudice the
Debtor’s amended disclosure statement; denied without prejudice
the Debtor's application authorizing employment of Scott Graf and
Corporate Realty Leasing Company, Inc. as Real Estate Broker; and
denied without prejudice the Debtor's Subchapter V motion.

Dwayne M. Murray has been named as Chapter 11 Trustee.

The Court held an evidentiary hearing on the UST's Motion To
Convert, the Arrowhead Ch. 11 Trustee Motion, the Debtor's
Disclosure Statement and related motions over the course of June
10-12 and June 25, 2020. During the multi-day hearing, the Court
heard testimony from one of the UST's bankruptcy auditors; the
Debtor's outside accountant; Susan Hoffman, the single
member/manager of the Debtor, and her husband, Peter Hoffman, an
authorized representative" of the Debtor "to deal with all matters
related to the financing of the properties in this proceeding," and
the Debtor's proposed real estate broker. The Court also considered
the arguments and exhibits provided by the parties. At the close of
the hearing, the Court took the matter under advisement to consider
the full record in deciding the motions before it, including the
post-trial briefs filed thereafter by the UST, Arrowhead, AMAG, and
the Debtor.

The Debtor, Royal Alice Properties, LLC, is a single-member limited
liability company, organized under the laws of Louisiana in
November 2011. Susan Hoffman is the sole member and manager of the
Debtor, although her husband, Peter Hoffman, testified that Susan
Hoffman orally "appointed" him "as the special representative to
assist Mrs. Hoffman with the proceedings under chapter 11." The
Debtor's only assets consist of three real estate properties in the
French Quarter neighborhood in New Orleans, Louisiana: (a) 900-902
Royal Street; (b) 906 Royal Street, Unit E; and (c) 910-912 Royal
Street, Unit C. All three properties secure repayment of an
obligation owed to AMAG. The Debtor's income derives solely from
leasing its three properties.

The Debtor filed its petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy relief on
August 29, 2019. According to the Debtor, it "filed for relief
under the Bankruptcy Code to stay an imminent foreclosure on its
Real Estate Assets filed by AMAG." On Feb. 5, 2020, the Debtor
filed its first plan of reorganization and disclosure statement.
Arrowhead, AMAG, and the UST filed objections. On April 15, 2020,
the UST filed its Motion To Convert, seeking (i) conversion of the
case to one under chapter 7 pursuant to section 1112(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code, or (ii) as an alternative, appointment of a
chapter 11 trustee under section  1104(a). The same day, Arrowhead
filed its Ch. 11 Trustee Motion pursuant to section 1104(a). Also
on April 15, 2020, the Debtor filed the Amended Disclosure
Statement and amended its plan of reorganization.

The Debtor's Amended Disclosure Statement indicates that the
Debtor's plan of reorganization envisions refinancing the property
located at 900-902 Royal Street to allow Susan Hoffman to retain
her residence and selling the other two properties to pay in full
the secured debt owed to AMAG. The Debtor proposed to achieve those
goals and fund the plan specifically by (i) obtaining
bridge-financing to take out AMAG's first-position debt -- or pay
AMAG partially on its debt (depending upon the outcome of the
adversary proceeding challenging the amount owed)  and
subordinating AMAG's position to the bridge lender (a current
requirement of the proposed bridge lender); (ii) selling two of its
three properties, 910-912 Royal Street, Unit C (the site of Cafe
Amelie) and 906 Royal Street, Unit E (the Duvernay space); (iii)
servicing the bridge loan and paying the administrative expenses
owed as of the Effective Date with rent proceeds; and (iv)
refinancing the bridge loan within a year after the Effective Date
to obtain more favorable terms. The Debtor included an appraisal
report as Exhibit B to the Amended Disclosure Statement, valuing
(i) 900-902 Royal Street at $3,450,000; (ii) 910-912 Royal Street,
Unit C, at $1,310,000; and (iii) 906 Royal Street, Unit E, at
$200,000.

Arrowhead, AMAG, and the UST each filed objections to the Amended
Disclosure Statement, primarily on feasibility grounds, but also
identifying concerns regarding third-party releases and the
designation of Susan Hoffman as the authorized individual to
investigate and prosecute retained causes of action against
insiders.

Upon analysis, the Court declined at this time to convert the case
to one under chapter 7 for cause. The Debtor holds valuable assets
and has a viable business model and the Court believed that
creditors would not be served by a liquidation. But the record in
this case amply supports the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee.

"In general, the factors which have been the basis for appointing a
trustee under section 1104(a)(2) are diverse and in essence reflect
the practical reality that a trustee is needed." "Among the factors
considered are: (i) the trustworthiness of the debtor; (ii) the
debtor in possession's past and present performance and prospects
for the debtor's rehabilitation; (iii) the confidence -- or lack
thereof -- of the business community and of creditors in present
management; and (iv) the benefits derived by the appointment of a
trustee, balanced against the cost of the appointment."

Applying those factors to the case at bar, the Court concluded that
the appointment of a trustee is in the best interest of the estate.
The trustworthiness of the Debtor to protect the interests of the
estate has been cast in doubt due to the Debtor's willingness,
absent Court approval, to set off prepetition expenses with the
post-petition rents that were due to the Debtor and then obfuscate
those set-offs by filing opaque MORs.

According to the Court, the principals of the Debtor suffer from
myriad conflicts which interfere in their ability to operate the
Debtor for the benefit of the estate and its creditors. The Court
found that, based on the totality of the circumstances here, the
protection and potential recovery for the estate through the
appointment of a trustee far outweighs the cost of the services to
be rendered. The creditors in this case are few and the assets,
while few, have considerable value. An independent and neutral
trustee, who owes fiduciary duties to both the Debtor and all
creditors, will be able to get up to speed quickly and operate the
Debtor's business, as well as investigate causes of action
belonging to the Debtor, without the conflicts currently afflicting
the Debtor's management. An independent and neutral trustee will be
able to negotiate with creditors objectively and provide
transparency and reliability to creditors, the UST, and this Court
regarding the finances of the Debtor. And an independent and
neutral trustee will be able to take over the rehabilitation effort
and supervise the Debtor's reorganization to maximize distributions
to creditors from the estate. The Court, therefore, appointed a
trustee, in this case, pursuant to section 1104(a)(2).

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order is available at
https://bit.ly/33VyCLT from Leagle.com.

                 About Royal Alice Properties

Royal Alice Properties, LLC, owns, manages and rents the building
and real estate located on the 900 block of Royal Street in the
French Quarter, New Orleans, Louisiana.  The condominium units are
located at 906, 910-12 Royal St. New Orleans, LA 70116.

Royal Alice Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 19-12337) on Aug.
29, 2019. In the petition signed by Susan Hoffman, member/manager,
the Debtor was estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets
and liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Elizabeth W. Magner.

Leo D. Congeni, Esq., at Congeni Law Firm, LLC, represents the
Debtor.


RUBIO'S RESTAURANTS: Seeks to Tap Stretto as Administrative Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. and its debtor affiliates seek approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
employ Stretto as administrative advisor.

The firm will render these professional services to the Debtors:

     (a) Assist with, among other things, legal noticing, claims
management and reconciliation, plan solicitation, balloting,
disbursements, and tabulation of votes, and prepare any related
reports, as required in support of confirmation of a chapter 11
plan, and in connection with such services, process requests for
documents from parties in interest;

     (b) Prepare an official ballot certification and, if
necessary, testify in support of the ballot tabulation results;

     (c) Assist with the preparation of the Debtors' schedules of
assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs and
gather data in conjunction therewith;

     (d) Provide a confidential data room, if requested;

     (e) Manage and coordinate any distributions pursuant to a
chapter 11 plan; and

     (f) Provide such other processing, solicitation, balloting and
other administrative services described in the Engagement
Agreement, but not included in the Section 156(c) Application, as
may be requested from time to time by the Debtors, the Court or the
Office of the Clerk of the Court.

Stretto will bill the Debtors no less frequently than monthly. All
invoices shall be due and payable upon receipt. Where an expense or
group of expenses to be incurred is expected to exceed $10,000,
Stretto may require advance or direct payment from the Debtors
before the performance of services hereunder. If any amount is
unpaid as of 30 days after delivery of an invoice, the Debtors
agree to pay a late charge equal to 1.5% of the total amount unpaid
every 30 days.

In addition, the Debtors agree to pay for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred by Stretto in connection with this engagement.

Upon execution of this Agreement, the Debtors shall pay Stretto an
advance fee of $25,000. Stretto may use such advance against unpaid
fees and expenses hereunder.

Sheryl Betance, a senior managing director of Stretto, disclosed in
court filings that the firm is a "disinterested person" as defined
in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Sheryl Betance
     STRETTO
     410 Exchange, St. 100
     Irvine, CA 92602
     Telephone: (714) 716-1872
     E-mail: Sheryl.betance@stretto.com

                     About Rubio's Restaurants

Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. and its debtor affiliates are operators
and franchisors of approximately 170 limited service restaurants in
California, Arizona, and Nevada under the Rubio's Coastal Grill
concept. Visit www.rubios.com for more information.

Rubio's Restaurants, Inc. and its debtor affiliates filed
concurrently filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-12688) on
October 26, 2020. The petitions were signed by Melissa Kibler,
chief restructuring officer. At the time of the filing, the Debtors
estimated to have $50 million to $100 million in assets and $100
million to $500 million in liabilities.

Judge Mary F. Walrath oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Ropes & Gray LLP as counsel, Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as Delaware counsel, Mackinac Partners LLC
as restructuring advisor, Gower Advisers as investment banker, and
B. Riley Financial, Inc. as real estate advisor. Stretto is the
claims, noticing, solicitation and balloting agent.


RWDY INC: Panel Seeks Approval to Hire Stout as Financial Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors appointed to the
chapter 11 case of RWDY, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana to employ
Stout Risius Ross, LLC as its financial advisor.

The firm will render these professional services:

     (a) Analysis of the Debtor's general financial and business
condition.

     (b) Review and critique of the Debtor's financial projections
and assumptions.

     (c) Review of the Debtor's financial information.

     (d) Financial advisory services.

     (e) Review and analysis of the reporting regarding cash
collateral and any debtor-in-possession financing arrangements and
budgets.

     (f) Qualitative analysis of the Debtor's plants, operations,
and facilities.

     (g) Qualitative analysis of the Debtor's customers and
suppliers.

     (h) Qualitative analysis of the Debtor's principal products
and markets.

     (i) Attend Committee meetings to discuss Stout's analyses.

     (j) Review of filings required by the Court or U.S. Trustee.

     (k) Analysis of assumption and rejection issues regarding
executory contracts and leases.

     (l) Review and analysis of the Debtor's proposed business
plan.

     (m) Assistance in evaluating reorganization strategies and
alternatives available to the creditors.

     (n) Assistance in preparing and/or reviewing documents
necessary for confirmation.

     (o) Advise and assist the Committee in negotiations and
meetings with the Debtor, lenders, and customers.

     (p) Advise and assist the Committee regarding tax consequences
of proposed actions.

     (q) Assist with the claims resolution procedures.

     (r) Determination of the Debtor's enterprise value as of the
petition date and as of the effective date of a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

     (s) Determination of asset and liquidation valuations.

     (t) Expert witness report and testimony regarding the Debtor's
enterprise valuation, the valuation of any securities proposed to
be issued under any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for the
Debtor, confirmation issues, or other matters.

     (u) Litigation consulting services and expert witness
testimony regarding confirmation issues, avoidance actions, or
other matters.

     (v) Other such functions as requested by the Committee or its
counsel to assist the Committee in this Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     John D. Baumgartner, Managing Director     $415.00
     Ann Huynh, Director                        $385.00
     Hayden Hill, Associate                     $210.00

Further, Stout will be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred
in connection with this engagement.

John D. Baumgartner, a managing director at Stout Risius Ross, LLC,
disclosed in court filings that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     John D. Baumgartner
     STOUT RISIUS ROSS, LLC
     1000 Main Street, Suite 3200
     Houston, TX 77002
     Telephone: (713) 225-9580
     Facsimile: (713) 225-9588
     E-mail: jbaumgartner@stout.com

                          About RWDY Inc.

RWDY, Inc. -- http://www.rwdyinc.com/-- is an internationally
recognized provider of oil field consultants. The Company's
personnel have successfully supported offshore drilling operations
in Australia, Brazil, Cameroon, New Zealand, Nigeria, Qatar, New
Zealand, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela. The Company's
consultants include: project managers; drilling/completion
engineers; drilling/completion foreman; mud engineers; HSE
advisors/SEMS advisors/HSE consultants; rig clerks/logistics
coordinators; shore base dispatchers/materials coordinators; rig
commissioning managers; and cement specialists.

RWDY Inc. filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 20-10616) on June
22, 2020.  In the petition signed by Brian T. Owen, president, the
Debtor was estimated to have up to $50,000 in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities. Judge John S. Hodge oversees
the case. Robert W. Raley, Esq., represents the Debtor.

On July 15, 2020, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 5
appointed the official committee of unsecured creditors in this
chapter 11 case. The committee tapped Stout Risius Ross, LLC as
financial advisor.


RYAN ENVIRONMENTAL: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Ryan Environmental,
LLC.

The committee members are:

      1. James E. Johnson
         Black Diamond Equipment Rental, LLC
         732 McClellandtown Road
         Uniontown, PA 15401
         (855) 250-5807
         (724) 550-4490
         JIMJ@bd-er.com

      2. Brian Redmond
         Hog Lick Aggregates, LLC
         340 Hoglick Hollow
         Fairmont, WV 26554
         (713) 705 -4591
         (804) 741-7314
         brian@Hlaggregates.com

     3. James R. Roddy
         Ligonier Construction Company
         P.O. Box 277
         Laughlintown, PA 15655
         (724) 238-4782 Ext. 110
         (724) 238-3841
         jroddy@ligonierconstruction.com
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                   About Ryan Environmental LLC

Ryan Environmental, LLC offers environmental consulting,
remediation, cleaning services, emergency spill response,
hydrocarbon lab services, corrosion services, well services,
general roustabout, and both steel and poly pipeline construction.

Ryan Environmental sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. W.Va.
Case No. 20-00738) on Sept. 29, 2020. In the petition signed by
Clayton Rice, managing member, the Debtor disclosed total assets of
$6,572,062 and total liabilities of $16,361,068.

Judge David L. Bissett oversees the case.

The Debtor has tapped Sheehan & Associates, P.L.L.C. as its legal
counsel.


SANAM CONYERS: Janam Madison's Amended Plan Confirmed by Judge
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Wendy L. Hagenau has entered an order confirming the First
Amended Plan of Reorganization of Janam Madison Lodging, LLC, a
debtor affiliate of Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC.

Section 1129(a)(3) is satisfied because the Amended Plan was
proposed in good faith and not by any means forbidden by law.

With respect to Section 1129(a)(8), Classes A and B are unimpaired,
and three impaired classes (Classes E, F, and G) have accepted the
Amended Plan. Class C (the Patel Group) has rejected the Amended
Plan and objected to it. Class D (the SBA) did not vote or file an
objection and took no position on whether the Amended Plan should
be confirmed.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement filed May 11,
2020 is available at:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/WAEOVTY/Sanam_Conyers_Lodging_LLC_and__ganbke-19-54798__0552.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

A full-text copy of the order dated August 14, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/yyj7o8j2 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                         About Janam Madison

Janam Madison owns and operates a single hotel located at 1972
Eaton Rd. Madison, GA 30650 d/b/a Red Roof Inn and Suites which was
purchased in February 2016 for $1,850,000.  The Hotel has 56 guest
rooms.  At the time the Hotel was acquired, Sunita Patel
contributed approximately $300,000 and financed the balance of the
purchase through loans with NOA Bank and the U.S. Small Business
Administration.

Equity interests are held by Sunita Patel, having 80 membership
units, and Galaxy Management, having 20 membership units.  Galaxy
Management, LLC, in turn, is owned 100% by Sunita Patel.

Janam Madison Lodging, Inc., along with related debtor entities,
filed a Chapter 11 petition on March 26, 2019 in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia.  Their cases
are jointly administered In re Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC (Bankr.
Lead Case No. 19-54798).  Judge Wendy L. Hagenau oversees the
cases.  Danowitz Legal, PC, is the Debtors' counsel.


SEAWALK INVESTMENTS: Says Sky's Plan Unconfirmable
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor Seawalk Investments, LLC objects to the Disclosure Statement
Regarding Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Sky Enterprise, LLC,
and in support, states as follows:

   * Sky's Plan of Reorganization is unconfirmable on its face.
Sky's Pan and Disclosure Statement wrongly describe the relative
lien priorities of classes of secured creditors.

   * Sky's Disclosure Statement fails to provide adequate
information regarding the Debtor's operations, fails to provide any
financial disclosures regarding the Debtor, the value of the
Debtor's property, or Sky.

   * Sky's Disclosure Statement fails to disclose that every single
voting creditor other than Sky has voted to accept the Debtor's
Plan of reorganization.

   * Sky's Disclosure Statement's description of the Debtor's
equity holders as unimpaired is patently wrong.  In fact, Sky's
Plan deprives them of the value of their ownership interest by
stripping them of the real property's value.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's objection dated Aug. 21, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y6a763wg from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

          WILCOX LAW FIRM
          Robert D. Wilcox
          93 Rio Drive
          Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida 32082
          Telephone: (904) 405-1250
          E-mail: rw@wlflaw.com
                  admin@wlflaw.com

                    About Seawalk Investments

Seawalk Investments, LLC, a privately held company in Jacksonville,
Fla., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-01010) on March 21, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, Debtor had estimated assets of between $1
million and $10 million and estimated liabilities of the same
range.  Judge Jerry A. Funk oversees the case.  Debtor has tapped
Wilcox Law Firm as its bankruptcy counsel and Gunn Chamberlain,
P.L. as its accountant.


SELLING N ATLANTA: K Designs Offers $115K for Stockbridge Property
------------------------------------------------------------------
Selling N Atlanta, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia to authorize the sale of the real
property located at 110 Shepherd Dr., Stockbridge, Georgia to K
Designs for $115,000.

The Debtor's primary business is the purchase, sale, and renovation
of residential real estate.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtor
held an interest in three residential properties: (i) 925
Greenville St., La Grange, GA 30241; (ii) the Property; and (iii)
111 Shepherd Dr., Stockbridge, GA 30281.

Harmony Capital, LLC asserts a lien against the Property.  The
Debtor listed Harmony on its schedules as a secured creditor with a
disputed claim in the amount of $62,902.

The Debtor wishes to sell the Property to the Buyer for $115,000,
subject to adjustment for ad valorem property taxes, community
association fees, solid waste and governmental fees and utility
bills for which service cannot be terminated as of the date of
closing will be prorated as of the date of closing, pursuant to the
terms of that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement for Real Property
dated as of Oct. 4, 2020.

The Property will be sold "as is."  The Buyer either has or will
provide Debtor with an earnest money deposit in the amount of
$5,000 to be held in escrow by the Law offices of Sam Maguire Jr.
Law Firm, the closing agent.  The Buyer will not assume any
liabilities of the Debtor in connection with the Property.

The Debtor also asks authorization to take such action and to
execute and deliver any warranty deeds, bills of sale, and other
documents, agreements, and instruments that may be necessary or
advisable to effectuate the terms of the sale.  The closing date
pursuant to the Agreement is Nov. 4, 2020.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Property to Buyer free and clear of
any and all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances under the
terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement, with any valid,
perfected, and enforceable liens to attach to the net proceeds
generated from the sale of the Property.

The Debtor has made reasonably diligent efforts to market the
Property for sale.  It believes that the Purchase Price offered for
the Property as set forth in the Agreement reflects the highest and
best price that could realistically be obtained for the Property
within the foreseeable future under the current circumstances.  It
believes that the Purchase Price will be sufficient to satisfy all
valid creditor claims in the bankruptcy case.  Hence, the Debtor
has exercised its sound business judgment in proposing the sale of
the Property.  Accordingly, ample cause exists for the proposed
sale of the Property to the Buyer.

Finally, because of the parties' desire to close the transaction
contemplated as promptly as possible (the current closing date is
Nov. 4, 2020), the Debtor asks that the Court orders and directs
that the order approving this Motion will not be automatically
stayed for 14 days.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y3jpqaxl from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                      About Selling N Atlanta, LLC

Selling N Atlanta, LLC, sought protection for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 20-67875) on
July 7, 2020, listing under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Leron E. Rogers, Esq. at LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD &
SMITH, LLP, represents the Debtor, as counsel.


SEMBLANCE MEDSPA: Gets Approval to Hire Truman Mox as Appraiser
---------------------------------------------------------------
Semblance Medspa, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of New York to employ Truman Mox,
Inc. to conduct an appraisal of the equipment used in its business
operation.

The appraiser will be paid at a fixed rate of $3,000.

Truman Mox President Joseph Marino disclosed in court filings that
his firm is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Joseph Marino
     Truman Mox, Inc.
     8584 E Washington St #106
     Chagrin Falls, OH 44023
     Phone: +1 888-494-3433

                     About Semblance Medspa

Semblance Medspa LLC provides medical spa services in Albany, New
York.  It offers body sculpting and contouring, skin tightening,
injectables, laser skin rejuvination, aesthetic treatments, PRP
treatments, laser hair removal, laser vein treatment, skin care
products, and IV hydration.

Semblance Medspa filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case
No. 20-11110) on Aug. 19, 2020.  In the petition signed by Farah
Sajid, owner, the Debtor disclosed $462,553 in assets and
$1,551,854 in liabilities.

Judge Robert E. Littlefield Jr. presides over the case.  Nolan
Heller Kauffman LLP, serves as Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


SEVEN STARS: Seeks to Tap George R. Ponczek to Provide Tax Services
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ
George R. Ponczek, CPA, P.A. to provide tax services.

The Debtor desires to employ the firm to provide tax advice and
assist in the preparation of the 2019 tax returns and 941.

The firm will be paid $2,650.00 for providing accounting services
to the Debtor.

George R. Ponczek, CPA, disclosed in court filings that he is a
"disinterested person" as that term is defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The accountant can be reached at:
   
     George R. Ponczek, CPA
     GEORGE R. PONCZEK, CPA, P.A.
     7805 NW Beacon Square Blvd. Ste. 201
     Boca Raton, FL 33487
     Telephone: (561) 477-2880
     Facsimile: (561) 477-1337
     E-mail: info@ponczekcpa.com

              About Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp.

Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp. manages a trampoline amusement
park. It conducts business under the name Rockin Jump. Visit
rockinjump.com/ftlauderdale for more information.

On Aug. 24, 2020, Seven Stars on the Hudson Corp. filed its
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-19106). The petition was signed
by Jens Berding, Debtor's authorized representative. At the time of
the filing, the Debtor disclosed total assets of $491,919 and total
liabilities of $1,393,203. Judge Scott M. Grossman oversees the
case. The Debtor tapped Brian K. McMahon, P.A., as legal counsel,
Kathleen A. Daly, P.A., as special counsel, and George R. Ponczek,
CPA, P.A. as tax services provider.


SHILO INN IDAHO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Shilo Inn, Idaho Falls, LLC
        780 Lindsay Blvd
        Idaho Falls, ID 83402

Business Description: Shilo Inn, Idaho Falls, LLC operates in the
                      hotel and motel industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Washington

Case No.: 20-42489

Debtor's
Lead
Bankruptcy
Counsel:          LEVENE, NEALE, BENDER, YOO & BRILL L.L.P.

Debtor's
Local
Bankruptcy
Counsel:          Bryan T. Glover, Esq.
                  STOEL RIVES LLP
                  600 University Street, Suite 3600
                  Seattle, WA 98101
                  Tel: (206) 624-0900
                  Email: bryan.glover@stoel.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Mark S. Hemstreet, secretary of Shilo
Idaho Falls Corp., manager.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/IHBN6KQ/Shilo_Inn_Idaho_Falls_LLC__wawbke-20-42489__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Bob Tiernan                                                $200
PO Box 366
Diablo, CA 94528
Tel: 503-697-7266

2. Booking.com B.V.                                        $19,162
Bank of America
Lockbox Services
PO Box 740401
Los Angeles, CA 90074-0401
Tel: 616-254-3517

3. Cartridge World Gresham                                     $99
10115 SW Nimbus
Ave St 600
Tigard, OR 97223

4. CenturyLink                                              $3,883
PO Box 2956
Phoenix, AZ 85062-2956

5. City of Idaho Falls                                      $3,380
Electricity/Garbage
308 Constitution Way
Idaho Falls, ID 83402

6. City of Idaho Falls                                      $1,200
(Water/Sewer)
308 Constitution Way
Idaho Falls, ID 83402

7. Clear Channel Outdoor                                    $3,906
PO Box 847247
Dallas, TX 75284-7247
Tel: 877-422-8326

8. Cogency Global                                             $119
10 East 40th St
10th FL
New York, NY 10016

9. Culligan Water Conditioning                                $139
433 May St
Idaho Falls, ID
83401-2619
Tel: 208-522-2500

10. Diversified Containers LLC                                $132
2184 Channino
Way Box 241
Idaho Falls, ID 83404

11. Ecolab                                                    $270
PO Box 100512
Pasadena, CA 91189-0512
Tel: 800-352-5326

12. En Pointe Technologies Sales                              $225
PO Box 740545
Los Angeles, CA 90074-0545
Tel: 310-337-5200

13. Expedia Inc.                                            $6,604
PO Box 844120
Dallas, TX 75284-4120
Tel: 888-397-1786

14. Fire Protection Services                                  $260
9950 SW Arctic Drive
Beaverton, OR 97005
Tel: 503-590-3732

15. Harbor Linen                                              $632
PO Box 3510
Cherry Hill, NJ 08304
Tel: 856-435-2000

16. Liberty Mutual Insurance                                $2,148
PO Box 85307
San Diego, CA
92186-5307
Tel: 503-239-5800

17. Positive Technologies                                     $471
4329 NE
Killingswroth, Ste A
Portland, OR 97218
Tel: 503-284-6565

18. Sceptre Hospitality Resources                             $867
PO Box 4356 Dept 1936
Houston, TX 77210-4356
Tel: 713-333-9944

19. Skytouch International                                  $3,805
4225 E Windrose Drive
Phoenix, AZ 85032
Tel: 855-832-3167

20. World Cinema Inc.                                       $9,496
PO Box 733288
Dallas, TX
75373-3288
Tel: 713-266-2686


SHOWBOX HOLDINGS: Files for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
------------------------------------------------
Liz Young of New York Business Journal reports that boutique boxing
studio Shadowbox has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Shadowbox operated studios in the Flatiron District, in Dumbo and
in Chicago, according to its website. Its workout combined boxing
technique, guided rounds on a heavy bag, and conditioning work.

Shadowbox Holdings LLC sought Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 20-12515) on Oct. 26, 2020.

Five affiliates also filed paperwork on Monday, October 26, 2020,
in U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York:

* Shadowbox NYC LLC at 28 W. 20th St. in the Flatiron District,
Manhattan;

* Shadowbox Dumbo LLC at 55 Prospect St. in Brooklyn;

* Shadowbox River North LLC at 667 N. Wells St. in Chicago;

* Shadowbox DTLA LLC at 777 S. Alameda Drive in Los Angeles;

* Shadowbox E-com LLC at 193 Perry Ave. in Norwalk, Connecticut;
and

Each of them — besides Shadowbox Holdings LLC — listed between
one and 49 creditors with estimated assets between $0 and $50,000
and estimated liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

Shadowbox Holdings LLC reported it has between 50 and 99 creditors,
also with estimated assets between $0 and $50,000 and estimated
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

Chris Barkley, board director, signed each of the filings. Attorney
David Wolnerman of White and Wolnerman PLLC in New York is
representing the company in the proceedings.

Judge Martin Glenn has been assigned to the Chapter 7 cases.

Gyms and fitness centers have been one of the industries hit
hardest by the Covid-19 pandemic, the shutdowns it forced and the
resulting economic turmoil. The businesses were forced to close
their doors in New York in mid-March in an attempt to slow the
spread of the coronavirus.

                    About Shadowbox Holdings

Shadowbox Holdings LLC is a company that operates fitness boxing
studios. It provides an intense full body workout with high
intensity interval training, heavy bag work and body weight
exercises.

The Debtors' bankruptcy counsel:

       David Wolnerman
       White & Wolnerman, PLLC
       Tel: 212-308-0603
       E-mail: dwolnerman@wwlawgroup.com


SMARTOURS LLC: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, appointed a
committee to represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases
of smarTours, LLC and its affiliates.
  
The committee members are:

     1. Cesar N. Abreu
        20206 Cortina Valley Drive
        Cypress, TX 77433
        Email: cnabreu@hotmail.com

     2. Larren Joseph
        113G Beverly Hill Terrace
        Woodbridge, N.J. 07095
        Email: larrenj@yahoo.com

     3. Michael Bloechle
        710 Epping Court
        Springfield, IL, 62711
        Email: m.bloechle@comcast.net
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                        About Smartours LLC

smarTours LLC is a travel company that offers tour packages with
airfare, hotels, and more included.  Founded in 1996, smarTours is
a provider of direct-to-consumer, value-oriented travel experiences
to a variety of domestic and global destinations.  It offers both
pre-packaged tours with pre-set departure dates for individual
travelers and customized private tours for passenger groups
consisting of more than 20 persons.

smarTours, LLC and an affiliate sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-12625) on Oct. 19, 2020.  The Hon.
Karen B. Owens is the case judge.

The Debtors have tapped Nixon Peabody LLP as its bankruptcy
counsel, Cross & Simon, LLC as local Delaware counsel, and Ariste
Advisors LLC as financial advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
agent.


SPEEDBOAT JV: Hires Beckman Feller as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Speedboat JV Partners, LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California to hire
Beckman, Feller & Chang, P.C. as its special counsel.

The Debtor requires legal assistance in connection with its case
against Capital One before the Superior Court for the County of
Placer.  Prosecution of the case is ongoing, and the Debtor's
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will contemplate prosecution of
the case to completion.

Beckman Feller will be paid at hourly rates as follows:

     Richard Beckman    $375
     David DeMourdant   $275
     Ben Larson         $125

The firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its estate with respect to the matters that will be the
subject of its representation, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Richard Beckman, Esq.
     Beckman Feller & Chang P.C.
     2298 Durant Avenue
     Berkeley, CA 94704   
     Phone:510-617-0635
     Fax: 510-548-7488

                      About Speedboat JV Partners

Speedboat JV Partners, LLC is engaged in activities related to real
estate.  It is the owner of fee simple title to certain property
located at 77 Speedboat Avenue, Kings Beach, CA, valued at $17
million.

Speedboat JV Partners filed its voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No.
20-30731) on Sept. 17, 2020. Marc Shishido, Debtor's manager,
signed the petition.  

At the time of filing, the Debtor disclosed $17.016 million in
assets and $2.3 million in liabilities.

St. James Law, P.C. and Beckman Feller & Chang P.C. serve as
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel and special counsel, respectively.


SPHIER EMERGENCY: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Sphier Emergency Room #2, LLC
        8721 Highway 6
        Missouri TX 77459

Business Description: Sphier Emergency Room #2, LLC is a Single
                      Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined in 11
                      U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas

Case No.: 20-35385

Debtor's Counsel: Clifton Kyle, Esq.
                  KYLE LAW GROUP, P.C.
                  1716 Washington Avenue
                  Houston, Texas 77007
                  Tel: 713-487-5751
                  Email: cckyle@kylelawgroup.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Dr. Swapan Dubey, managing member.

The Debtor lists Sienna Associations as its sole unsecured creditor
holding a claim of $5,043.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/F633HAY/Sphier_Emergency_Room_2_LLC__txsbke-20-35385__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


SPOILED SWEET: Plan of Reorganization Confirmed by Judge
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jennie D. Latta has entered an order finally approving the
Disclosure Statement and confirming Plan of Reorganization of
debtor Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc.

The Disclosure Statement and Plan were served on the creditors and
all interested parties and that there are four classes of creditors
that voted to accept or are deemed to have accepted the Plan, and
that no classes voted to reject the Plan.

The Plan complies with the provisions of the Code, and the Debtor
as proponent of the Plan, has complied with the applicable
provisions of the Code.

The Plan has been proposed in good faith and not by any means
forbidden by law, and that the Plan complies with and satisfies the
provisions of Section 1129(a) and (b) of the Code.

A full-text copy of the order dated October 15, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/y4xvmcbo from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Attorney for Debtor:

        P. Preston Wilson , BPR # 4304
        Wampler, Carroll, Wilson & Sanderson, PC
        44 N. 2nd Street, Suite 500
        Memphis, TN 38103
        Tel: 901/523-1844
        E-mail: preston@prestonwilsonlaw.com

                     About Spoiled Sweet Designs

Based in Germantown, Tennessee, Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc. filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-28449) on Oct. 23, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge
George W. Emerson Jr. oversees the case.  Preston Wilson, Esq., at
Wampler & Pierce, PC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


SPOILED SWEET: Responds to US Trustee Objection to Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc. and in response to the Amended US
Trustee's Objection to Debtor's Disclosure Statement ("UST
Objection") would state as follows:

The Debtor admits that the Disclosure Statement did not contain a
summary of its monthly operating reports, through an oversight of
its counsel, but submits the error is harmless.

With respect to the historical information about the Debtor's
operations, Debtor submits that it is more than adequate as
written, and that the more pertinent information is that
information regarding the Debtor's current and future operations
and its ability to make the payments provided in the Plan.

The Debtor points out that:

   * The US Trustee is in error in stating that the EIDL funds
cannot be used for a Down Payment on the TDR or Landmark claims.

  * Notwithstanding the fact that EIDL loan proceeds could be used
to for the Down Payments provided in the original Plan, the Debtor
has amended its Plan to avoid any potential concerns regarding the
use of the EIDL funds.

The Debtor submits that the instant injunction with respect to
Tennessee Department of Revenue ("TDR") meets the seven factors and
is permissible, and that the Plan could be confirmed on that
basis.

The Debtor further points out that:

   * TDR has consented to the injunction. This injunction was
specifically bargained for by the Debtor and consented to by TDR.

   * With respect the objection in Paragraph 8 of the UST
Objection, the US Trustee misinterprets the meaning of claims that
may be "reduced to $3500."

   * With respect to Paragraph 9 of the UST Objection, the Debtor
has now filed the August operating reports.

Attorney for Spoiled Sweet Boutique, Inc.:

     P. Preston Wilson, BPR #004304
     Debtor in Possession
     44 N. 2nd Street, Suite 500
     Memphis, TN 38103
     Tel: 901/523-1844
     E-mail: preston@prestonwilsonlaw.com

                     About Spoiled Sweet Designs

Based in Germantown, Tennessee, Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc. filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-28449) on Oct. 23, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge
George W. Emerson Jr. oversees the case.  Preston Wilson, Esq., at
Wampler & Pierce, PC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


SPOILED SWEET: Submits Modifications to Reorganization Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc., pursuant to Section 1127 of the Code
and amends its Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization as follows:

The Plan is amended by modifying Paragraph 5.a. of Article 5,
Execution and Effect of the Plan, by modifying the third and fourth
sentences of Paragraph 5.a. as follows:

   " . . . The Debtor will use the use the EIDL funds to make a
substantial initial payment ("Down Payment") to TDR one of the
Debtor's two largest creditors of the Debtor's estate by far, which
will reduce debt service payments and ease demands of Debtor's cash
flow under the reorganization Plan. The remaining funds will be
used as operating capital to fund Debtor's operations, primarily in
purchasing inventory for the fall and Christmas seasons, paying
payroll, rent, utilities and other operating expenses; this will
allow the Debtor to use accumulated cash from operations to make
the 40% Down Payment to Landmark as provided in Paragraph 4.4(a)
above."

A full-text copy of the Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated
October 5, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yyz4yc5v from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About Spoiled Sweet Designs

Based in Germantown, Tennessee, Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc. filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-28449) on Oct. 23, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge
George W. Emerson Jr. oversees the case.  Preston Wilson, Esq., at
Wampler & Pierce, PC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


SPOILED SWEET: U.S. Trustee Objects to Plan & Disclosure
--------------------------------------------------------
Paul A. Randolph, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 8,
objectedto the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan of
Reorganization filed by Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc.

The U.S. Trustee claims that the Disclosure Statement does not
contain adequate historic information on the Debtor's operations,
which would enable creditors to assess the current financial status
of the Debtor and determine the feasibility of the proposed plan
payments.

The U.S. Trustee points out that Article 4 Sections 4.6 and 4.7 do
not provide sufficient information to unsecured creditors. The Plan
should be amended to provide general unsecured creditors with
sufficient information to determine if they are a Class 6 or Class
7 claim.

The U.S. Trustee asserts that the Debtor is not in compliance with
the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code as the Debtor has failed to
file the August 2020 monthly operating report.  11 U.S.C. Sec.
1129(a)(2).

The U.S. Trustee further asserts that the Plan provides for
insiders in Class 8 and Class 9. Accordingly, the U.S. Trustee
reserves the right to further object to confirmation depending on
the outcome of balloting, as contemplated by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1129
(a)(10).

A full-text copy of the U.S. Trustee's objection to plan and
disclosure statement dated October 1, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y3gsnwfj from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                 About Spoiled Sweet Designs Inc.

Based in Germantown, Tennessee, Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc. filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-28449) on Oct. 23, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. Preston
Wilson, Esq., at Wampler & Pierce, PC, is the Debtor's legal
counsel.  Judge George W. Emerson Jr. oversees the case.


SRAK CORPORATION: Seeks to Hire Glast Phillips as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
SRAK Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Texas to employ Glast, Phillips & Murray,
P.C. as counsel.

The firm will render these legal services to the Debtor:

     (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers
and duties as debtor-in-possession in the continued operation of
its business and the management of their property;

     (b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor necessary motions,
answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers in connection with
the administration of its estate;

     (c) assist the Debtor in preparing and filing a plan of
reorganization at the earliest possible date;

     (d) perform any and all other legal services for the Debtor in
connection with the Chapter 11 Case; and

     (e) perform such legal services as the Debtor may request with
respect to any matter, including, but not limited to, corporate
finance and governance, contracts, antitrust, labor, and tax.

The firm has charged a flat fee of $30,000.00 for representation
and services related to this Chapter 11 Case. On or about October
8, 2020, the firm received the flat fee payment.

Brandon J. Tittle, Glast, Phillips & Murray, P.C., disclosed in
court filings that the firm has no known connections with the
Debtor, its creditors, or other parties-in-interest in this Chapter
11 Case, and does not hold or represent any other known or
reasonably ascertainable interest adverse to the Debtor's estate
with respect to the matters upon which it is to be engaged.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Brandon J. Tittle, Esq.
     GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY, P.C.
     14801 Quorum Drive, Suite 500
     Dallas TX 75254-1449
     Telephone: (972) 419-7186
     Facsimile: (972) 419-8329
     E-mail: btittle@gpm-law.com

                      About SRAK Corporation

SRAK Corporation sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 20-43155) on October 9,
2020, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Edward L. Morris oversees the case. Glast, Phillips & Murray,
P.C. serves as the Debtor's counsel.


STONEWALL MOTORS: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 20% Over 5 Years
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Stonewall Motors Incorporated filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of North Carolina a Plan of
Reorganization dated August 28, 2020.

Class 1 Priority claims shall be paid over 60 months at legal rate
of interest.

Non-priority unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will
receive distributions, which the proponent of this Plan has valued
at approximately 20% over 5 years.

Class 4 Equity security holders of the Debtor shall retain their
interests.

The Debtor will fund payments under the Plan from its normal
business operations.

A full-text copy of the plan of reorganization dated August 28,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4mhj6mm from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.
The Debtor is represented by Dirk W. Siegmund.
         
                     About Stonewall Motors

Stonewall Motors, Inc., a company based in Graham, North Carolina,
filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No.
20-10497) on June 1, 2020, listing under $1 million in both assets
and liabilities.  Ivey, McClellan, Gatton & Siegmund, LLP is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


SUNEX INTERNATIONAL: Trustee Seeks to Hire Michael Seese as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry E. Mukamal, the liquidating trustee in the chapter 11 case of
Sunex International, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Michael D.
Seese and the law firm of Seese, P.A. as his counsel.

Mr. Seese and the law firm of Seese, P.A. will represent the
trustee in investigating and prosecuting avoidance actions and all
other matters for which the trustee may require counsel in
connection with this chapter 11 case.

Mr. Seese has agreed to be paid at $450 per hour for his services.

In connection for the avoidance actions, Seese has agreed to accept
the following:

     (a) Fees: 33.33% of any monies recovered, whether through
settlement, judgment or otherwise.

     (b) Costs: The Debtor's estates will be responsible for the
advancement or reimbursement of all costs incurred by the firm in
connection with the prosecution of the avoidance actions.

Michael D. Seese, the founding shareholder of the law firm of
Seese, P.A., disclosed in court filings that neither the firm nor
its attorneys hold nor represent any interest adverse to the estate
with respect to the matters for which they will be retained.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Michael D. Seese, Esq.
     SEESE, P.A.
     101 N.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1270
     Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Telephone: (954) 745-5897
     E-mail: mseese@seeselaw.com

                     About Sunex International

Founded in 1985, Sunex International --http://www.sunexintl.com/--
is a supplier of architectural products and complete turn-key
building materials for builders, architects, and designers
throughout the Caribbean and South Florida.

Pompano Beach, Fla.-based Sunex International, Inc., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-14372) on April
3, 2019. The petition was signed by Jerry Rand, president. At the
time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have between $1
million and $10 million in both assets and liabilities. Judge
Raymond B. Ray oversees the case. Michael D. Seese, Esq., at Seese
P.A., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Barry E. Mukamal is the liquidating trustee in this chapter 11
case. He is represented by Michael D. Seese, Esq., at Seese P.A.


SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Systems Integrators, LLC
        23630 N. 35th Drive, Suite 1
        Glendale, AZ 85310

Business Description: Systems Integrators, LLC is a privately
                      owned and operated manufacturing company
                      that offers custom gasket manufacturing, a
                      full-service CNC machine shop, machine
                      vision systems/part inspection equipment,
                      fatigue testing equipment, concentration
                      analyzers, flow meters, electronic assembly
                      and repair.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona

Case No.: 20-12055

Judge: Hon. Eddward P. Ballinger Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: Randy Nussbaum, Esq.
                  SACKS TIERNEY P.A.
                  4250 N Drinkwater Blvd.
                  4th Floor
                  Scottsdale, AZ 85251-3693
                  Tel: 480-425-2600
                  Email: Randy.Nussbaum@SacksTierney.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Samuel M. Gaston, managing member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/SXWQJFQ/SYSTEMS_INTEGRATORS_LLC__azbke-20-12055__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


TBH19 LLC: DBD Says Changes Address Deficiencies
------------------------------------------------
DBD Credit Funding, LLC, has made further amendments to the
disclosure statement explaining its proposed competing plan for
debtor TBH19, LLC., a Delaware limited liability company.

DBD has carefully reviewed the Court's Order denying a previous
version of DBD's Disclosure Statement, as well as the findings of
fact and conclusions of law issued by the Court in support of the
Order. See Dkt. 687 (the "Order"); Dkt. 686 (the "FOFCOL").  As a
result of this review, DBD has made responsive revisions to the
Disclosure Statement which can be seen in the Third Amended
Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization [Dkt. 725] (the
"Third Amended Disclosure Statement") filed on October 8, 2020.  In
light of these revisions, and as discussed more fully herein, DBD
submits the Disclosure Statement contains adequate information
under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1125 and should therefore be approved.

In addition to this facial satisfaction of Section 1125, DBD has
diligently reviewed the Court's Order and FOFCOL and revised the
Disclosure Statement to address all the issues raised therein.
First, to address paragraph 1 of the FOFCOL, DBD filed the Third
Amended Disclosure Statement on October 8, 2020 with 42 days'
notice before the hearing set by the Court on November 19, 2020.
Second, DBD revised the three disclosures described by the Court in
paragraph 2 of the FOFCOL to ensure their consistency.  Third, DBD
attached an additional exhibit — Exhibit L — that provides
further, detailed disclosures about the subjects listed in
paragraphs 3 and 4 of the FOFCOL.  See Third Amended Disclosure
Statement, Ex. L ("Exhibit L").  Among other things, Exhibit L
describes the ongoing marketing process of the Real Property;
provides further details regarding litigation involving the Debtor
in the Superior Court of the State of California; and cites legal
authority and precedent for the structure of the Plan and the
powers to be assigned to the Liquidating Trustee.  See id.  Fourth
and finally, DBD removed the provisions identified by the Court in
paragraph 5 of the FOFCOL.  All of these revisions can be seen in
the redlines attached to the Notice of Filing the Third Amended
Disclosure Statement.  See Dkt. 726, Exs. A-J. As a result of these
revisions, DBD believes that the level of detail and information in
the Disclosure Statement is more than sufficient to meet the
requirement for "adequate information" under Section 1125.

A copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/R2ZWQPA/TBH19_LLC_a_Delaware_Limited_Liability__cacbke-19-23823__0725.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

The Court will hold a hearing on Nov. 19, 2020 to consider approval
of the Disclosure Statement filed by DBD.

                          Terms of Plan

The Debtor states that it filed for bankruptcy because of problems
with creditors, including misrepresentations, the lack of
follow-through on agreements, and default actions. See Ross 2004
14:8–21.  DBD believes the Debtor filed for bankruptcy as part of
an ongoing effort to maintain control over its main asset -- that
certain piece of real property located at 1011 N. Beverly Drive,
Beverly Hills, California 90210 (the "Real Property") along with
all personal property owned by Debtor, or in which the Debtor has
an interest (collectively, the "Personal Property").

The Proponent does not believe that the Debtor's economic health
has, or will, improve from its pre-bankruptcy state.  The Debtor's
debt load has become unsustainable.  The Debtor's creditors are
unwilling to continue offering concessions to the Debtor and the
Property (as defined below) should be sold and the proceeds
distributed to creditors pursuant to the terms of the Plan.

Under Section 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code, the confirmation of the
Plan automatically vests all property of the estate, including the
Property, in a trust to be administered by the Multi-Purpose
Post-Confirmation Agent.

                           About TBH19 LLC

TBH19, LLC owns a single-family residential property located at
1011 N. Beverly Hills, Calif., having an appraised value of $125
million.  The residence is considered one of the crowning
achievements of renowned architect Gordon Kaufmann and was built in
1927 for Milton Getz, executive director of the Union Bank & Trust
Company.  TBH19 is managed by Lenard M. Ross.

TBH19 sought for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
19-23823) on Nov. 24, 2019.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of
$125,042,955 and total liabilities of $75,126,312 as of the
bankruptcy filing.  Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo oversees the case. The
Law Offices of Robert M. Yaspan, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


TM HEALTHCARE: Ombudsman Seeks to Hire Baker Donelson as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Eric M. Huebscher, the patient care ombudsman appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases of TM Healthcare Holdings, LLC and its debtor
affiliates, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to employ Baker, Donelson, Bearman,
Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. as his counsel.

The firm will render these legal services:

     (a) Represent the Ombudsman in any proceeding or hearing in
the Bankruptcy Court, and in any action in other courts where the
rights of the patients may be litigated or affected as a result of
this Case;

     (b) Advise the Ombudsman concerning the requirements of the
Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules and the requirements of
the Office of the United States Trustee relating to the discharge
of his duties under Section 333 of the Bankruptcy Code;

     (c) File a motion seeking permission for the Ombudsman to have
access to patient records as contemplated by Section 333 of the
Bankruptcy Code; and

     (d) Perform such other legal services as may be required under
the circumstances of this Case in accordance with the Ombudsman's
powers and duties as set forth in the Bankruptcy Code.

The hourly rates of Baker Donelson's attorneys and other
professionals are as follows:

     Zachary J. Bancroft, Shareholder          $520
     Locke Houston Waldrop, Associate          $310
     Shareholders                       $450 - $550
     Associates                         $275 - $325
     Legal Assistants/Paralegals        $125 - $250

Zachary J. Bancroft, a shareholder in the firm of Baker, Donelson,
Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C., disclosed in court filings
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined
in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Zachary J. Bancroft, Esq.
     BAKER, DONELSON, BEARMAN, CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ, P.C.
     200 South Orange Avenue, Suite 2900
     Orlando, FL 32801
     Telephone: (407) 422-6600
     Facsimile: (407) 841-0325
     E-mail: zbancroft@bakerdonelson.com

                   About TM Healthcare Holdings

TM Healthcare Holdings, LLC, a Stuart, Fla.-based company in the
health care business, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-20024) on Sept. 17,
2020. The petition was signed by CFO Paul Kamps. At the time of the
filing, Debtor had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of between $50 million and $100 million. Judge Erik P.
Kimball oversees the case. Shraiberg Landau & Page P.A. is the
Debtor's legal counsel.

On October 9, 2020, the Office of the United States Trustee for the
Southern District of Florida filed the notice appointing Eric M.
Huebscher as patient care ombudsman in this case. The ombudsman
tapped Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. as his
counsel and Huebscher & Company as his consultant and advisor.


TM HEALTHCARE: Ombudsman Seeks to Tap Huebscher & Co. as Consultant
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric M. Huebscher, the patient care ombudsman appointed in the
chapter 11 cases of TM Healthcare Holdings, LLC and its debtor
affiliates, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to employ Huebscher & Company as his
consultant and advisor.

The firm will render these professional services:

     (a) Review of medical records;
     (b) Interviews of patients and staff regarding direct patient
care;
     (c) Site visits;
     (d) Interaction with key Debtor personnel;
     (e) Interaction with State regulatory agencies as appropriate;
and
     (f) Responding to complaints, if any.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Directors          $225
     Consultants        $150
     Administrative      $75

In addition, the firm will seek reimbursement of its actual and
necessary expenses incurred in connection with this engagement.

Eric M. Huebscher, the president and chief executive officer of
Huebscher & Company, disclosed in court filings that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as that term is defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Eric M. Huebscher
     HUEBSCHER & COMPANY
     630 3rd Avenue, 21st Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Telephone: (646) 584-3141
     Facsimile: (212) 202-3503
     E-mail: info@HuebscherConsulting.com

                   About TM Healthcare Holdings

TM Healthcare Holdings, LLC, a Stuart, Fla.-based company in the
health care business, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-20024) on Sept. 17,
2020. The petition was signed by CFO Paul Kamps. At the time of the
filing, Debtor had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of between $50 million and $100 million. Judge Erik P.
Kimball oversees the case. Shraiberg Landau & Page P.A. is the
Debtor's legal counsel.

On October 9, 2020, the Office of the United States Trustee for the
Southern District of Florida filed the notice appointing Eric M.
Huebscher as patient care ombudsman in this case. The ombudsman
tapped Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. as his
counsel and Huebscher & Company as his consultant and advisor.


TNT QUADRANGLE: Seeks to Tap Wolf & Henderson as Litigation Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TNT Quadrangle Partners, LP seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ Wolf &
Henderson, PC, as special litigation counsel.

The Debtor seeks to employ Wolf & Henderson to represent the Debtor
in a litigation commenced pre-petition and pending in the 162nd
Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, Case No.
DC-20-03256, styled TNT Quadrangle Partners, LP, and TNT Quad, LLC
v. SRBF B/Quadrangle Property, LLC.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     William Wolf     $425.00
     Craig Hederson    $375.00
     Dylan Anderson    $250.00

The firm represented the Debtor prior to the Petition Date. In
consideration of its services, the firm has been paid $49,925.23,
in total, with respect or related to the lease litigation through
today. The last invoice from the firm was dated August 5, 2020, and
was for $29,201.46. The firm discounted the last invoice by 15%.
Presently no monies are due and owing from the Debtor to the firm.

William L. Wolf, a member of the law firm of Wolf & Henderson, PC,
disclosed in court filings that the firm and its attorneys are
"disinterested persons" as that term is defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code and do not hold or represent an adverse
interest to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     William L. Wolf, Esq.
     Craig P. Henderson, Esq.
     WOLF & HENDERSON, P.C.
     4309 Irving Ave, Suite 200
     Dallas, TX 75219
     Telephone: (214) 750-1395
     Facsimile: (214) 368-1395
     E-mail: chenderson@wolf-law.com

                  About TNT Quadrangle Partners

TNT Quadrangle Partners, LP, filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No.
20-32006) on July 27, 2020. At the time of the filing, Debtor had
estimated assets of between $50,001 and $100,000 and liabilities of
between $500,001 and $1 million.  

Judge Stacey G. Jernigan oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped DeMarco-Mitchell, PLLC, as counsel and Wolf &
Henderson, PC, as special litigation counsel.


TOOJAY'S DELI: Emerges from Chapter 11 With New Owners
------------------------------------------------------
QSR reports that TooJay's Deli announced that it has emerged from
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, successfully completing its debt
restructuring process and implementing its Chapter 11
reorganization plan.  

The restructuring process allowed the company to emerge debt free,
which it believes will provide significant financial flexibility to
support its operations.  The company's new owner, Monroe Capital,
is providing capital to support growth in the business going
forward.  

"For 39 years, TooJay's has been an iconic, well-recognized brand
serving many Florida communities. Prior to COVID-19, the Company's
revenue was ahead of last year, but the pandemic's impact created
difficulty for many industries. We want to thank our team members
and guests for their support during this time.  Our locations are
open and continue to serve our communities, and we look forward to
the future," says TooJay's CEO Maxwell Piet.

TooJay's has an iconic brand supported by a loyal customer base and
maintains a solid foundation of core locations with a proven track
record of success. In addition to offering multi-daypart
in-restaurant dining, TooJay's is a leader in off-premise channel
offerings including curbside takeout, delivery, and a strong
catering program. While the COVID-19 pandemic presented many
challenges for the restaurant industry, TooJay's locations have
safely remained open in accordance with CDC, federal, state and
local guidelines. TooJay's has a history of operational excellence
bolstered by a compelling store footprint, which has positioned the
Company exceptionally well to pursue a path of long-term
profitability and growth in a post-COVID world.

Monroe Capital LLC is an asset management firm specializing in
direct lending, equity co-investments and opportunistic private
credit investing. Since 2004, the firm has provided private credit
and equity co-investment solutions to borrowers in the U.S. and
Canada. Investment types include cash flow, enterprise value and
asset-based loans; unitranche financings; and equity
co-investments. Monroe is committed to being a value-added and
user-friendly partner to business owners, senior management, and
private equity and independent sponsors. The firm is headquartered
in Chicago and maintains offices in Atlanta, Boston, Los Angeles,
New York, and San Francisco.

Monroe has been recognized by Creditflux as the 2020 Best US Direct
Lending Fund; Global M&A Network as the 2020 Small Middle Markets
Lender of the Year; Private Debt Investor as the 2018 Lower
Mid-Market Lender of the Year; M&A Advisor as the 2016 Lender Firm
of the Year; and the U.S. Small Business Administration as the 2015
Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) of the Year.

                     About TooJay's Management

TooJay's Management LLC is a South Florida-based deli, bakery and
restaurant chain that serves guests in Palm Beach and Broward
counties, the Treasure Coast, the West Coast of Florida, the
Orlando area and The Villages. TooJay's offers homemade comfort
foods, handcrafted sandwiches and made-from-scratch soups, salads,
and baked goods. It operates 16 locations in different counties in
Florida.

TooJay's Management and 31 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-14792) on April 29, 2020.  

TooJay's Management was estimated to have $50 million to $100
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities as
of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Erik P. Kimball is the case judge.

Akerman LLP, a law firm based in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., originally
served as Debtors' legal counsel.  Debtors later hired Berger
Singerman LLP as counsel, replacing Akerman.  Getzler Henrich &
Associates, LLC is Debtor's financial advisor.


TOOJAY'S DELI: Has Closed Some Florida Locations
------------------------------------------------
The Orlando Sentinel reports that West Palm Beach-based TooJay's
Deli is emerging from bankruptcy under new owners but has closed at
least some restaurants, including one in the east Orange County
community of Waterford Lakes.

Founded in 1981 with a single location in Palm Beach, the company's
website currently shows 21 restaurants in Florida.  Prior to the
bankruptcy filing, the website listed 30 Florida restaurants.

The Waterford Lakes location at 715 N. Alafaya Trail is listed
online as permanently closed.  The company still lists Central
Florida locations in Orlando, Dr. Phillips, Altamonte Springs, Lake
Mary and The Villages.

ToJay's entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy in late April, saying the
decision was "a direct result of the devastating impact" of the
state-imposed shutdown of all restaurant dining rooms.

Investment by the company's new owner, Monroe Capital LLC, will
enable the company to move forward debt-free, according to a news
release in early September.

Monroe Capital LLC of Chicago calls itself a "private credit asset
management firm specializing in direct lending and opportunistic
private credit lending."

In 2018, Monroe Capital announced it had arranged financing to
support future growth and expansion of TooJay’s, then with 28
restaurants.

South Florida Sun Sentinel staff writer Ron Hurtibise contributed
to this report.

                         About TooJay's Management

TooJay's Management LLC is a South Florida-based deli, bakery and
restaurant chain that serves guests in Palm Beach and Broward
counties, the Treasure Coast, the West Coast of Florida, the
Orlando area and The Villages. TooJay's offers homemade comfort
foods, handcrafted sandwiches and made-from-scratch soups, salads,
and baked goods. It operates 16 locations in different counties in
Florida.

TooJay's Management and 31 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-14792) on April 29, 2020.  

TooJay's Management was estimated to have $50 million to $100
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities as
of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Erik P. Kimball is the case judge.

Akerman LLP, a law firm based in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., originally
served as Debtors' legal counsel.  Debtors later hired Berger
Singerman LLP as counsel, replacing Akerman.  Getzler Henrich &
Associates, LLC is Debtor's financial advisor.


TOWN SPORTS: Seeks Going Concern Sale; Proceeds to Fund Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
Town Sports International, LLC and its Debtor Affiliates filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a Joint
Chapter 11 Plan and a Disclosure statement on October 20, 2020.

The Debtors actively pursued a going-concern sale with all
interested parties both before and after the Petition Date.  On
Oct. 2, 2020, the Debtors filed a motion seeking Bankruptcy Court
approval of the Bidding Procedures pursuant to which the Debtors
would market and sell all or substantially all of their assets
prior to confirmation of the Plan.

Subsequent to the contemplated sale for all or substantially all of
the Debtors' assets being consummated, subject to Bankruptcy Court
approval, the Debtors propose to liquidate under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code.  Under chapter 11, a debtor may reorganize or
liquidate its business for the benefit of its stakeholders.  The
consummation of a going concern transaction followed by an orderly
liquidation is the principal objective of the Chapter 11 Cases.

The primary objective of the Plan is to maximize the value of
recoveries to all Holders of Allowed Claims and Allowed Interests
and generally to distribute all property of the Estates that is or
becomes available for distribution generally in accordance with the
priorities established by the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors believe
that the Plan accomplishes this objective and is in the best
interest of the Estates.

Generally speaking, the Plan:

  * provides the vesting of all Available Cash from the proceeds of
Sale Transaction in the Post-Effective Date Debtors, for the
purpose of distribution to Holders of Claims;

  * provides for the full and final resolution of funded debt
obligations;

  * designates a Plan Administrator to wind down the Debtors'
affairs, pay and reconcile Claims, and administer the Plan in an
efficacious manner; and

  * contemplates recoveries to Holders of Administrative Claims,
Secured Tax Claims, Priority Tax Claims, Other Priority Claims, and
Other Secured Claims as is necessary to satisfy Section 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 20,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2sleouh from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

Proposed Co-Counsel for the Debtors:

         Robert S. Brady
         Sean T. Greecher
         Allison S. Mielke
         YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
         Rodney Square
         1000 North King Street
         Wilmington, Delaware 19801
         Telephone: (302) 571-6600
         Facsimile: (302) 571-1253

             - and -

         Nicole L. Greenblatt, P.C.
         Derek I. Hunter
         KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
         KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
         601 Lexington Avenue
         New York, New York 10022
         Telephone: (212) 446-4800
         Facsimile: (212) 446-4900

             - and -

         Joshua M. Altman
         KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
         KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
         300 North LaSalle Street
         Chicago, Illinois 60654
         Telephone: (312) 862-2000
         Facsimile: (312) 862-2200

             - and -

         Mark McKane, P.C.
         KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
         KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
         555 California Street
         San Francisco, California 94104
         Telephone: (415) 439-1400
         Facsimile: (415) 4391500

                 About Town Sports International

Town Sports International, LLC and its subsidiaries are owners and
operators of fitness clubs in the United States, particularly in
the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions. As of Dec. 31, 2019, the
Company operated 186 fitness clubs under various brand names,
collectively serving approximately 605,000 members. Town Sports
owns and operates brands such as New York Sports Clubs, Boston
Sports Clubs, Philadelphia Sports Clubs, Washington Sports Clubs,
Lucille Roberts and Total Woman.

Town Sports and several of its affiliates filed for bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-12168) on Sept. 14,
2020.  The petitions were signed by Patrick Walsh, chief executive
officer.

The Debtors were estimated to have $500 million to $1 billion in
consolidated assets and consolidated liabilities.

The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi presides over the cases.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, and Kirkland & Ellis LLP have
been tapped as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.  Houlihan Lokey,
Inc., serves as financial advisor and investment banker to the
Debtors, and Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC acts as claims and
noticing agent to the Debtors.


TRI MECHANICAL: Trustee Hires Springer Larsen as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas E. Springer, the appointed trustee in the chapter 11 case of
Tri Mechanical, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois to employ Joshua D. Greene
and the law firm of Springer Larsen Greene, LLC as his legal
counsel.

Springer Larsen Greene will render these professional services:

     (a) advise and consult with the trustee regarding the assets
and operations of the Debtor and the Debtor's ability to
successfully reorganize under Title 11;

     (b) prepare the necessary applications, complaints, answers,
orders, reports, related pleadings and other legal papers and to
appear before the Court regarding such matters as well as to
prepare the necessary orders relative to those matters;

     (c) prepare, file and prosecute any and all actions to recover
property of the estate and to perform all necessary functions
related to execution of this Court's Orders;

     (d) prepare and file a plan of reorganization and disclosure
statement on behalf of the Trustee;

     (e) perform any and all legal services that may be required
from time to time during the administration of the estate herein.

The hourly rates of the firm's attorneys are as follows:

     Thomas E. Springer    $455
     David R. Brown        $455
     Richard G. Larsen     $440
     Michele M. Springer   $440
     Joshua D. Greene      $440
     John H. Squires       $500

The trustee agrees to pay the firm a retainer of $10,000.00 to be
used to fund the trustee's initial investigation, analysis and
preparation of a plan of reorganization, if applicable.

Joshua D. Greene, an attorney at Springer Larsen Greene, LLC,
disclosed in court filings that the firm and its attorneys are
"disinterested persons" as that term is defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Thomas E. Springer, Esq.
     Joshua D. Greene, Esq.
     SPRINGER LARSEN GREENE, LLC
     Wheaton Office Center
     300 S. County Farm Road, Ste. G
     Wheaton, IL 60187
     Telephone: (630) 510-0000
     E-mail: jgreene@springerbrown.com

                       About Tri Mechanical

Tri Mechanical LLC is a full-service contracting company that
provides design and build services, equipment, installations,
replacement and upgrade of current systems, and retrofitting
services.

Tri Mechanical sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case
No. 20-11762) on May 31, 2020. The petition was signed by Rodd
Duff, manager. At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed total
assets of $157,155 and total liabilities of $2,551,893. Judge
Jacqueline P. Cox oversees the case. David P. Lloyd, Esq. is
Debtor's legal counsel.

On October 19, 2020, Thomas E. Springer was appointed as trustee in
this chapter 11 case. Joshua D. Greene and the law firm of Springer
Larsen Greene, LLC serve as his attorneys.


TRI-STAR LOGGING: Seeks Exclusivity Extension Thru November 12
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tristar Logging, Inc., requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Arizona to extend by 60 days the periods within which
the Debtor has the exclusive right to file a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization to November 12, 2020, and solicit acceptances of the
plan to January 11, 2021.

The Debtor says it is diligently making progress toward a complete
framework for what it believes will be a consensual plan and has
reached plan support stipulations with nearly all of its equipment
suppliers. The Debtor is also negotiating plan treatment with the
few remaining secured creditors not already committed to the
treatment of their claims under a plan and is formulating the
remaining restructured business terms necessary to the
implementation of a plan.

The Debtor is current on its quarterly payments to the Office of
the United States Trustee, is paying its post-petition debts as
they come due, and is in the process of filing its latest monthly
operating report still due. The cash collateral budgets approved by
the Court reflect the Debtor's positive revenue that will provide a
solid basis for a plan favorable to creditors.

Yet due to the worldwide pandemic, the Debtor has not been spared
from the economic impact and battled through the unprecedented
economic challenges. While the Debtor's profit margins are not yet
as wide as pre-pandemic projections predicted, its economic
situation remains solid, improving, and confidently headed toward a
confirmable, very possibly consensual plan.

The nature of TriStar's forestry operations also includes a number
of government contracts, secured equipment vendors, and business
arrangements with strategic business partners, such as Novo
BioPower. The Debtor has a number of secured creditors, some with
financing agreements formatted as leases and is working to come to
terms with those equipment vendors, and has already done so with
most. There are at least 55 proofs of claim filed thus far, which
TriStar is addressing.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3jWEPwu at no extra charge.

                     About Tri-Star Logging

Tri-Star Logging, Inc., based in Snowflake, Arizona, is primarily
engaged in the business of logging and forestry operations in the
area.

Tri-Star Logging filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case
No. 20-01565) on Feb. 14, 2020.  In the petition signed by Kevin
Reidhead, chief financial officer, the Debtor was estimated to have
$1 million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million
in liabilities.
  
Joseph E. Cotterman, Esq., at Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A., is
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.



TRUE HEALTH: Wins Order Blocking HHS from Withholding Payments
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mary Anne Pazanowski of Bloomberg Law reports that the Health and
Human Services Department must reimburse a health-care provider,
True Health, for services it rendered to Medicare patients after
filing a petition in bankruptcy because the Bankruptcy Code's
automatic stay prohibits the agency from withholding the payments,
a federal court in Delaware said.

The HHS issued orders suspending True Health Diagnostics LLC's
Medicare reimbursements in 2017 and 2019, based on alleged
overpayments made for services rendered in 2017.

But True Health won an order blocking the HHS from withholding
payments for services provided after July 30, 2019, when it filed
its bankruptcy petition.

                        About THG Holdings

THG Holdings LLC and its affiliates, including True Health
Diagnostics LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11689) on July
30,
2019.

THG's business is conducted in large part through True Health
Diagnostics -- https://truehealthdiag.com/ -- a laboratory provider
of diagnostic and disease-management solutions based in Frisco,
Texas. It utilizes proprietary and innovative diagnostic technology
to detect disease indicators that enable early stage diagnosis and
monitoring for a variety of chronic diseases.

At the time of the filing, True Health Diagnostics had estimated
assets of between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of
between $100 million and $500 million.

The cases have been assigned to Judge John T. Dorsey.

The Debtors tapped Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as
bankruptcy counsel; Perkins Coie LLP as special counsel; SSG
Capital Advisors LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as claims, noticing and solicitation agent.


TUESDAY MORNING: Two Creditors Removed as Committee Members
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a notice filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas that these
creditors are the remaining members of the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Tuesday Morning
Corp. and its affiliates:

     1. Nourison Industries, Inc.
        c/o Jonathan Stern, CFO
        5 Sampson Street
        Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
        201-368-6900 ext. 2246 – office phone
        917-359-1448 – mobile
        Jonathan.stern@nourison.com

     2. Three Hands Corp.
        c/o Shant Anan, President
        13259 Ralston Avenue
        Sylmar, CA 91342
        818-833-1200
        818-833-1212 – fax
        shanta@threehands.com

     3. The CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc.
        c/o Joseph Lux, Director
        201 South Tryon Street, 3rd Floor
        Charlotte, NC 28202
        704-339-3085
        704-339-2864 – fax
        Joe.lux@cit.com

Peacock Alley, Inc.'s and Popular Bath's names did not appear in
the notice.  They were appointed as committee members on June 9,
court filings show.

                    About Tuesday Morning Corp.

Tuesday Morning Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, is a
closeout retailer of upscale home furnishings, housewares, gifts,
and related items. It operates under the trade name "Tuesday
Morning" and is one of the original "off-price" retailers
specializing in providing unique home and lifestyle goods at
bargain values. Based in Dallas, Tuesday Morning operated 705
stores in 40 states as of Jan. 1, 2020.  On the Web:
http://www.tuesdaymorning.com/       

On May 27, 2020, Tuesday Morning and six affiliates sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-31476).  Tuesday
Morning disclosed total assets of $92 million and total liabilities
of $88.35 million as of April 30, 2020.

The Hon. Harlin Dewayne Hale is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Haynes and Boone, LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Alixpartners LLP as financial advisor; Stifel, Nicolaus &
Co., Inc. as investment banker; A&G Realty Partners, LLC as real
estate consultant; and Great American Group, LLC as liquidation
consultant. Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC is the claims and
noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on June 9, 2020. The committee is represented by Munsch
Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.


TUESDAY MORNING: Unsecureds Owed $117M to Recover 100% in Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday Morning Corporation, et al., submitted a Plan and a
Disclosure Statement.

The Plan provides for the resolution of claims against and
interests  in  the Debtors and implements a distribution scheme
pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code.  Distributions under the Plan will
be made with: (1) cash on hand, including cash from operations; (2)
the New ABL Credit Facility; (3) the New Real Estate Credit
Facility; (4) the issuance of the General Unsecured Bonds; and (5)
reinstatement of the Tuesday Morning Corporation Interests, as
applicable

Class 1 Other Priority Unsecured Claims are impaired.  Each holder
of an Allowed Other Priority Unsecured Claim shall receive, on or
after the Effective Date the following: (i) Payment in full in Cash
of its Allowed Class 1 Claim; or (ii) Such other treatment as is
consistent with the requirements of Bankruptcy Code section
1129(a)(9).  Class 1 is projected to have 100% recovery.

Class 2 Other Secured Claims totaling $200,000 are impaired.  Each
holder of an Allowed Other Secured Claim shall receive, on or after
the Effective Date the following: (i) Payment in full in Cash of
its Allowed Class 2 Claim; (ii) The collateral securing its Allowed
Class 2 Claim; provided, however, any collateral remaining after
satisfaction of such Allowed Class 2 Claim shall revest in the
applicable Reorganized Debtor pursuant to the Plan; or (iii)
Reinstatement of its Allowed Class 2 Claim.  Class 2 is projected
to have a 100% recovery.

Class 4 Existing First Lien Credit Facility Claims $100,000 is
impaired.  Each holder of an Allowed Existing First Lien Credit
Facility Claim shall receive payment in full, in Cash, of its
Allowed Class 4 Claim, in three equal installments to be paid on
the 30th, 60th, and 90th days after the Effective Date.  Class 4 is
projected to recover 100%.

Class 5 General Unsecured Claims totaling $116,700,000 are
projected to recover 100 percent.  Each holder of an Allowed Class
5 Claim shall receive its Pro Rata share of (i) the General
Unsecured Cash Fund and (ii) the General Unsecured Bonds.

Class 6 Convenience Claims totaling $8,300,000 are impaired.  Each
holder of an Allowed Class 6 Claim shall receive the Convenience
Claim Distribution.

Class 8 Tuesday Morning Corporation Interests are impaired.  On the
Effective Date, Class 8 Interests will be Reinstated, subject to
dilution as otherwise provided for in the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated September 23,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yyuj2zmc from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtors:

     Ian T. Peck
     Jarom J. Yates
     Jordan E. Chavez
     HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
     2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
     Dallas, TX 75219
     Telephone: 214.651.5000
     Facsimile: 214.651.5940
     Email: ian.peck@haynesboone.com
     Email: jarom.yates@haynesboone.com
     Email: jordan.chavez@haynesboone.com

                    About Tuesday Morning Corp.

Tuesday Morning Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, is a
closeout retailer of upscale home furnishings, housewares, gifts,
and related items. It operates under the trade name "Tuesday
Morning" and is one of the original "off-price" retailers
specializing in providing unique home and lifestyle goods at
bargain values. Based in Dallas, Tuesday Morning operated 705
stores in 40 states as of Jan. 1, 2020. For more information, visit
http://www.tuesdaymorning.com/      

On May 27, 2020, Tuesday Morning and six affiliates sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-31476). Tuesday
Morning disclosed total assets of $92 million and total liabilities
of $88.35 million as of April 30, 2020.

The Hon. Harlin Dewayne Hale is the case judge. The Debtors tapped
Haynes and Boone, LLP as general bankruptcy counsel; Alixpartners
LLP as financial advisor; Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc. as
investment banker; A&G Realty Partners, LLC as real estate
consultant; and Great American Group, LLC as liquidation
consultant. Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC is the claims and
noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on June 9, 2020. The committee is represented by Munsch
Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.


TWIN CARE HOME: Unsecured Creditors to Have 100% Payout in Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Twin Care Home, Inc. submitted a Plan and a Disclosure Statement.

The Debtor operates a residential facility for disabled persons in
a rented single-family house located at 419 W. Renwick Street in
Glendora 91740. All of Debtor's assets are associated with the Real
Property – there is no other real property and personal property
includes only bank account balances and a small amount of office
and kitchen equipment used in the facility.

Class 1a Secured Claim of CA Labor (Recorded Judgment) is impaired.
Creditor will be paid on monthly interval beginning on the
Effective Date through the term of the plan until claim is paid in
full. The payment amount is $1000.00. The claim will be paid in
full across the term of the plan.

Class 3 General unsecured claims projected to total $5,857 are
impaired.  The unsecured creditors will receive a monthly payment
of $97.62, beginning on the effective date and ending on the
effective date. The total payout is 100 percent of claims.

The Plan will be funded by Debtor's resident fees and principal
contributions (if needed).

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated September 7,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yyqpknuj from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorney for Twin Care Home:

     Dana M. Douglas
     Attorney at Law
     11024 Balboa Blvd., No. 431
     Granada Hills, CA 91344
     MAILING ADDRESS:
     4712 Admiralty Way #1001
     Marina del Rey, CA 90292
     818-360-8295 Telephone
     530-273-3702 Facsimile
     dana@danamdouglaslaw.com

                      About Twin Care Home

Twin Care Home, Inc., is a privately held corporation operating a
residential facility for adults with special need.  It is licensed
by the State of California and provides round the clock care for
its residents.  Based in Los Angeles, Twin Care sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-22666) on Oct. 28,2019.
Dana M. Douglas, Esq., is the Debtor's counsel.


UNIQUE HOME: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Two affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                           Case No.
    ------                                           --------
    Unique Home Solutions, Inc. (Lead Case)          20-06089
    5550 Progress Road
    Indianapolis IN 46241

    Unique Home Solutions of Ohio, LLC               20-06093
    6625 Engle Road
    Cleveland, OH 44130

Business Description: Unique Home Solutions --
                      https://uniquehomesolutions.org -- has been
                      providing home renovation services since
                      1983.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Indiana

Judge: Hon. Robyn L. Moberly

Debtors' Counsel: Jeffrey M. Hester, Esq.
                  John J. Allman, Esq.
                  HESTER BAKER KREBS, LLC
                  Suite 1300
                  One Indiana Square
                  Indianapolis, IN 46204
                  Tel: 317-833-3030
                  Fax: 317-833-3031
                  Email: jhester@hbkfirm.com
                         jallman@hbkfirm.com

Unique Home Solutions, Inc.'s
Total Assets: $2,769,055

Unique Home Solutions, Inc.'s
Total Liabilities: $6,588,647

Unique Home Solutions of Ohio's
Total Assets: $769,268

Unique Home Solutions of Ohio's
Total Liabilities: $3,394,812

The petitions were signed by Robert Dillon, president.

Copies of the petitions containing, among other items, lists of the
Debtors' 20 largest unsecured creditors are available for free  at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/VTY4DMA/Unique_Home_Solutions_Inc__insbke-20-06089__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/3JYHLUI/Unique_Home_Solutions_of_Ohio__insbke-20-06093__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


VECTOR SINCE 1989: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Vector Since 1989, Inc.
  
                   About Vector Since 1989 Inc.

Vector Since 1989, Inc. owns and operates a machine shop in
Monticello, Minn.  It offers the latest in precision Multi-Spindle
technologies and Swiss machining techniques.

Vector Since 1989 sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Minn. Case No. 20-42239) on Sept. 21,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $1 million and $10
million.  

Judge Kathleen H. Sanberg oversees the case.

Steven B. Nosek, P.A. serves as Debtor's legal counsel.


VIDANGEL INC: Court Confirms Trustee and Studios' Joint Ch. 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Kevin R. Anderson issued his findings regarding
the confirmation of the Trustee and the studios' joint plan of
reorganization and the approval of the settlement agreement between
Debtor VidAngel, Inc., studios Disney Enterprises, Inc., Lucasfilm
Ltd. LLC, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Warner Bros.
Entertainment Inc., MVL Film Finance, LLC, New Line Productions,
Inc., and Turner Entertainment Co., and the Harmons.

Among other things, Judge Anderson found that the Confirmed Joint
Plan and the Co-Proponents Comply with the Bankruptcy Code. The
Confirmed Joint Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code. Likewise, the Trustee and the Studios have each
complied with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.
Thus, 11 USC section 1129(a)(1) and (a)(2) are satisfied.

The Confirmed Joint Plan was proposed in good faith and not by any
means forbidden by law, and therefore complies with the
requirements of section 1129(a)(3). In determining that the
Confirmed Joint Plan has been proposed in good faith, the Court has
examined the totality of the circumstances surrounding the
Bankruptcy Case and the formulation of the Confirmed Joint Plan.

Judge Anderson also said the Confirmed Joint Plan satisfies section
1129(a)(7) with respect to all Classes of Claims and Interests. All
impaired Classes have accepted the Trustee's Plan as modified,
which modifications have resulted in the Confirmed Joint Plan. All
Classes that have not accepted the Trustee's Plan by affirmative
vote are deemed to accept the Confirmed Joint Plan because, among
other reasons, the holders of Claims and Interests in such classes
are not impaired. In addition, the holders of all Classes of Claims
and Interests will receive or retain under the Confirmed Joint Plan
on account of such Claim or Interest property of a value, as of the
Effective Date, that is not less than the amount that such holder
would so receive or retain if the property of the Estate was
liquidated under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on such date.

The Confirmed Joint Plan is also feasible and complies with section
1129(a)(11) because confirmation is not likely to be followed by a
liquidation or the need for further financial reorganization of the
Debtor. The Confirmed Joint Plan offers a reasonable prospect of
success and is workable. The Confirmed Joint Plan provides that the
Debtor will continue business operation after the Effective Date.
The Confirmed Joint Plan settles the substantial disputes between
the Debtor and the Studios. The Trustee has presented credible
evidence that the Debtor will have sufficient "cash flow" to
satisfy its operating expenses and debt obligations after the
Effective Date, and that it should have sufficient cash to fund the
cash distributions contemplated under the Confirmed Joint Plan. In
short, there is a reasonable prospect that the Debtor's anticipated
future cash will be sufficient to fund the payments required under
the Confirmed Joint Plan, and that the Debtor will be able to
satisfy its obligations under the Confirmed Joint Plan. In summary,
the evidence shows that the Confirmed Joint Plan offers a
reasonable prospect of success, and is workable. As such, the
requirements of section 1129(a)(11) are satisfied.

Regarding the Settlement Agreement, Judge Anderson held that there
is a sound business purpose for the terms and conditions of the
Settlement Agreement, and its approval is in the best interests of
the Debtor, the Estate, its creditors, and its interest holders. In
making the determination that the Settlement Agreement should be
approved, the Court weighed the following factors: (1) the
probability of success in the litigation; (2) the potential
difficulty in collecting on a judgment; (3) the complexity and
expense of the litigation; and (4) the best interests of creditors.
These factors support approval of the Settlement Agreement.

A copy of the Court's Findings and Conclusions is available at
https://bit.ly/312WcVd from Leagle.com.

                         About VidAngel Inc.

VidAngel is an entertainment platform empowering users to filter
language, nudity, violence, and other content from movies and TV
shows on modern streaming devices such as iOS, Android, and Roku.
The company's newly launched service empowers users to filter via
their Netflix, Amazon Prime, and HBO on Amazon Prime accounts, as
well as enjoy original content produced by VidAngel Studios. Its
signature original series, Dry Bar Comedy, now features the
world's
largest collection of clean standup comedy, earning rave reviews
from fans nationwide.

VidAngel, Inc., based in Provo, Utah, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 17-29073) on Oct. 18, 2017. In the
petition signed by CEO Neal Harmon, the Debtor estimated $1
millionto $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  

Judge Kevin R. Anderson presides over the case.

J. Thomas Beckett, Esq., at Parsons Behle & Latimer, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  The Debtor hired Durham Jones &
Pinegar and Baker Marquart LLP as its special counsel; and Tanner
LLC as its auditor and advisor. The Debtor also hired economic
consulting expert Analysis Group, Inc. The Debtor tapped Stris &
Maher LLP as special counsel in the Debtor's Appellate Case.


VILLA ABRIGO: Plan Confirmation Hearing Continued to Nov. 12
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Erik P. Kimball on Oct. 15, 2020 entered an order directing
that the hearing to consider confirmation of the Liquidating Plan
of Villa Abrigo at Celeste, LLC, and fee applications will be
continued to Nov. 12, 2020, at 2:00 p.m.

The hearing will be conducted by telephone only.  To appear by
telephone, you must establish  an  account  with CourtSolutions and
follow its procedures.  Reservations should be arranged online at
https://www.court-solutions.com.  If a party is unable to register
online, a reservation may also be made by telephone at (917)
746-7476.

At a hearing Aug. 27, 2020, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division, approved of
the Disclosure Statement filed in connection with the Liquidating
Plan and set an Oct. 8 hearing to consider confirmation of the
Plan.

Creditor BridgeWell Capital, LLC, and the U.S. Trustee have
submitted objections to confirmation of the Plan.

                   About Villa Abrigo at Celeste

Villa Abrigo at Celeste, LLC, a privately held company based in
Delray Beach, Fla., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-10285) on Jan. 9,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  Judge Erik P. Kimball oversees the case.  The Debtor is
represented by Brian K. McMahon, Esq.


VIRTUOLOTRY LLC: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Dec. 21
----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Harlin Dewayne Hale in Dallas has approved the
First Amended Disclosure Statement in Support of the Plan of
Reorganization of Virtuolotry, LLC.

The Court will hold a hearing to confirm the Debtor's plan on
December 21, 2020, at 9:00 a.m.  The last day to object to
confirmation of the Plan is December 1.  Plan ballots are also due
December 1.

Judge Hale previously extended the periods within which the Debtor
has the exclusive right to file a plan of reorganization to August
21 and to confirm a plan to October 19.

As previously reported by the Troubled Company Reporter,
Virtuolotry, LLC filed with Bankruptcy Court its Chapter 11 Plan
and Disclosure Statement dated July 31, 2020.  The primary purpose
of the Plan is to facilitate the resolution and treatment of the
Debtor's outstanding claims, liens, and equity interests.  The Plan
contemplates the sale of the Debtor's primary asset, the Denton
Property, to fund its obligations under the Plan.

Class 5 Unsecured Claims are impaired under the Plan.  On and after
the Effective Date, except to the extent that a Holder of a General
Unsecured Claim agrees to different treatment, the Debtor or
Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, shall continue to pay or dispute
each General Unsecured Claim in the ordinary course of business as
if the Bankruptcy Case has never been commenced.

On account of their Class 7 Equity Interests, the Holders of Equity
Interests in the Debtor shall retain their interests in in the
Debtor (which Interests will become Interests in the Reorganized
Debtor post-confirmation).

The Plan incorporates the Court's Order Approving Settlement and
Compromise of Fraudulent Transfer and Wrongful Foreclosure Claims
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019, entered on
July 24, 2020.

The Reorganized Debtor will market for sale the Denton Property,
and shall use the proceeds from the sale of the Denton Property
first to the pay the Denton Property Closing Costs and any Allowed
Class 1 (Secured Ad-Valorem) claims.  The sale proceeds thereafter
remaining (the "Denton Property Gross Sale Proceeds") will next be
used to fund the Westwood Escrow, an amount necessary to pay
Administrative Expenses, including Professional Claims, and an
amount necessary to pay Class 4 (Convenience Claims).  Any Denton
Property Gross Sale Proceeds remaining after funding of the
Westwood Escrow, payment of Administrative Expenses, including
Professional Claims, and payment of Class 4 Claims may be used by
the Reorganized Debtor without any restriction.

Contemporaneously with the closing of the sale of the Denton
Property, the Debtor or Reorganized Debtor, as applicable, shall
deposit or cause to be transferred into the Westwood Escrow, from
the Denton Property Gross Sale Proceeds, an amount equal to the
Westwood Escrow Amount.  Such amounts shall remain in the Westwood
Escrow until the amount of Westwood Claim is finally determined.

Westwood Motorcars, LLC has sought the appointment of a Chapter 11
trustee or, in the alternative, conversion of the Debtor's case to
Chapter 7, or authorization to pursue certain avoidance actions on
behalf of the Debtor and its estate.  Westwood contends the
Debtor's bankruptcy case was filed in bad faith.

According to Westwood, a Texas state court entered a June 4, 2019
judgment against the Debtor and in favor of Westwood.  Westwood has
filed an Adversary Proceeding against Dreki Capital, LLC, seeking
to recharacterize as equity any claims or liens claimed by Dreki
against the Debtor.

Westwood objected to the adequacy of the information found in the
Disclosure Statement.

Attorneys for Westwood Motorcars, LLC:

     John P. Lewis, Jr., Esq.
     Hayward & Associates, PLLC
     10501 N. Central Expressway, Suite 106
     Dallas, TX 75231
     Telephone/Facsimile: 972-755-7106
     Email: jplewis@haywardfirm.com

          - and -

     Jim Pennington, Esq.
     Law Offices of James E. Pennington, P.C.
     900 Jackson Street, Suite 440
     Dallas, TX 75202-4473
     Telephone: 214-741-3022
     Facsimile: 214-617-9289
     Email: jep@jeplawyer.com

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated July 31, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5e7fagd from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3lDeDaA at no extra charge.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/313sL5a at no extra charge.

                        About Virtuolotry

Virtuolotry, LLC, a company engaged in renting and leasing real
estate properties, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-33900) on Nov. 22,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $1 million and $10
million.  Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale oversees the case.  Jason
Patrick Kathman, Esq., at Pronske & Kathman, P.C., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.



VIRTUOLOTRY LLC: Westwood Says Disclosures Inadequate
-----------------------------------------------------
Westwood Motorcars, LLC, filed an objection to the Disclosure
Statement in support of Plan of Reorganization filed by
Virtuolotry, LLC.

Westwood asserts that the Disclosure Statement in this case
contains inadequate information.

Westwood points out that the Disclosure Statement does not disclose
Westwood's pending motion to appoint a trustee, convert Debtor's
case to Chapter 7, or authorize Westwood to pursue certain
avoidance actions on behalf of Debtor and its estate [ECF Docket
No. 82] ("Trustee Motion").

Westwood further points out that the Disclosure Statement does not
disclose that Westwood contends that Debtor's bankruptcy case was
filed in bad faith for the reasons set forth in the Trustee Motion.


Westwood asserts that the Disclosure Statement and Section 2.2.45
of the Plan does not disclose (or inadequately discloses) whether
the term "Final Order" refers solely to orders of the Texas state
appellate court in respect of the appeal of the Westwood judgment
or whether such term applies to orders entered by all courts.

Westwood complains that the Disclosure Statement and Section 2.2.79
of the Plan does not disclose (or inadequately discloses) whether
the "Westwood Escrow" will be created using a state or federal
court registry or a private escrow party; Westwood will object to
confirmation of any Plan that does not provide for the escrowed
funds to be deposited into a court registry or with an independent,
financially responsible, and reputable escrow agent.

According to Westwood, the Disclosure Statement and Section 2.2.81
of the Plan does not disclose (or inadequately discloses) that the
Texas state court also entered a June 4, 2019, judgment against
Debtor and in favor of Westwood and that such additional judgment
should be included in the defined term used in the Plan and
Disclosure Statement.

Westwood points out that the Disclosure Statement does not disclose
(or inadequately discloses) that Westwood has objected to any claim
of Dreki as a secured claim and seeks the avoidance or
subordination of any lien or security in respect of such claim.

Westwood further points out that the Disclosure Statement does not
disclose (or inadequately discloses) that Westwood has filed an
Adversary Proceeding against Dreki seeking to recharacterize as
equity any claims or liens claimed by Dreki.

Westwood asserts that the Disclosure Statement does not disclose
(or inadequately discloses) the timetable for selling the Denton
Drive Property or a date by which Westwood would be entitled to
enforce its judgment lien against such property if the property has
not been sold by such date.

Westwood complains that the Disclosure Statement does not disclose
(or inadequately discloses) the "Sales Agreement" or the terms of
the "Sales Agreement" for the Denton Drive Property referenced in
Section 6.2.1 of the Plan.

According to Westwood, the Disclosure Statement does not disclose
(or inadequately discloses) the timetable for selling the Denton
Drive Property or a date by which Westwood would be entitled to
enforce its judgment lien against such property if the property has
not been sold by such date.

Westwood points out that the Disclosure Statement does not disclose
(or inadequately discloses) that neither the automatic stay nor any
discharge prevents the parties from proceeding with the pending
state court appeal and the appellate court(s) from adjudicating
such appeal.

Westwood further points out that the Disclosure Statement does not
disclose that Dreki has not conveyed the Denton Drive Property to
Debtor as required by this Court's order and that Westwood has
filed a motion to compel Dreki to convey such property to the
Debtor and to otherwise comply with this Court's orders.

Westwood asserts that the Disclosure Statement does not disclose
(or inadequately discloses) that Westwood's state court judgments
against Debtor and Richard Boyd will not be discharged, released,
subordinated, or impaired by any provision of the Plan.

Westwood complains that the Disclosure Statement does not
adequately describe the relationship between the Debtor, Richard
Boyd, Dreki Capital, LLC, River Sangha, LLC, and other entities
owned or controlled by Richard Boyd.

Attorneys for Westwood Motorcars:

     John P. Lewis, Jr.
     Hayward & Associates, PLLC
     10501 N. Central Expressway, Suite 106
     Dallas, Texas 75231
     Telephone/Facsimile: 972-755-7106
     Email: jplewis@haywardfirm.com

           - and -

     Jim Pennington
     Law Offices of James E. Pennington, P.C.
     900 Jackson Street, Suite 440
     Dallas, Texas 75202-4473
     Telephone: 214-741-3022
     Facsimile: 214-617-9289
     Email: jep@jeplawyer.com

                       About Virtuolotry

Virtuolotry, LLC, a company engaged in renting and leasing real
estate properties, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-33900) on Nov. 22,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $1 million and $10
million.  Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale oversees the case.  Jason
Patrick Kathman, Esq., at Pronske & Kathman, P.C., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.


WAYNE P. BURICK: Nagels Buying New Wilmington Property for $500K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne P. Burick and Virginia Sue Burick ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to authorize the
sale of the real property located at 4547 State Route 158, New
Wilmington, Pennsylvania to Michael E. Nagel, Jr. and Monique R.
Nagel for $500,000.

Among the Debtors' assets include the Property.  The Property is
owned in fee simple by the Debtors, which Deed has been recorded in
the Recorder of Deeds Office in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania.  

The Property is subject to the following:

     a. Real estate tax liens to Lawrence County Tax Claim Bureau,
with a business address of Attn: Arishia Foster, Tax Claim
Director, 430 Court St. New Castle, PA 16101.  Lawrence County Tax
Claim Bureau has not filed a claim in the case, however a recent
tax certification indicates delinquent real estate taxes owed in
the approximate amount of $8,873.

     b. Real estate tax liens to Richard Rapone, Lawrence County
Treasurer, with business address of 430 Court St., New Castle, PA
16101.  Richard Rapone, Treasurer has not filed a proof of claim,
however a recent tax certification indicates delinquent real estate
taxes owed in the approximate amount of $4,256.

     c. Teal estate tax liens to Wilmington Twp c/o Jodie Elder,
T.C. with a business address of 669 Wilson Mill Rd., New Castle, PA
16105.  Wilmington Twp has not filed a claim in this case, to date,
the Debtors' Counsel has received a tax certification in the amount
of $7,723.

     d. Real estate tax lien to Wilmington Area School District c/o
Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd. with a business address of 2700
Horizon Drive, Suite 100, King of Prussia, PA 19406.  Wilmington
School District did file a claim in the case, however a recent tax
certification indicates delinquent real estate taxes owed in the
approximate amount of $18,094.

     e. The Internal Revenue Service filed a Priority claim in this
case in the amount of $27,668 and will be paid with sale
proceedings at time of closing.   

     f. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Revenue
filed a claim in the case in the amount of $33,506 and will be paid
with sale proceedings at time of closing.

     g. Key Bank, N.A. was both a secured and unsecured creditor of
the Debtors.  The Debtors' Amended Chapter 11 Plan dated April 24,
2020 was confirmed on July 7, 2020.  Said Plan provided for the
Debtors to surrender the real estate located at 3470 Wilmington
Road, New Castle, PA 16105 to Key Bank in full satisfaction of ALL
its claims.  This includes an additional two (2) unsecured claims:
(a) #2-1 in the amount of $10,041; and (b) #3-1 in the amount of
$45,446 for a total unsecured amount of $55,487.  The Secured &
Unsecured claims total $892,589.  The Confirmation Order and Plan
provided that Key Bank will discharge all debts, release all
debtors from liability and satisfy all mortgages and/or UCC-1's
and/or any applicable security agreement and file Satisfactions
with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and/or Lawrence County
Recorder of Deeds within 60 days of Confirmation.  Key Bank will
not receive any funds from the proceeds of the sale.  Key Bank,
N.A., is listed herein as a respondent for notice purposes only.

     h. The Debtors have timely-filed, unsecured claims which total
$22,932 excluding the unsecured claims of Key Bank. The following
unsecured creditors have been timely filed: (a) The Huntington
National Bank (POC#4-1) - $545; (b) Comcast (POC#10-1) - $291; (c)
Directv, LLC (POC#13-1) - $225; (d) Quatum3 Group LLC as agent for
Comenity Bank (POC# 14-1) - $76; (e) Quatum3 Group LLC as agent for
Comenity Bank (POC# 15-1) - $535; (f) Synchrony Bank (POC#16-1) -
$4,260; and (g) Regional Acceptance (POC#11-2) - $16,461.  These
unsecured claims will be paid in full through the sale of the New
Wilmington, PA property.

The Debtors have agreed to sell and the Buyers have agreed to buy
the real property subject to the Motion.  The total purchase price
is $500,000, on the terms of the Offer to Purchase.  The sale is an
"as is", "where is" sale and is contingent upon the Debtors
receiving Court approval of said sale.

The Debtors aver that the sales price is fair and reasonable under
the circumstances.  The property had been on the market for
approximately 2 years.  The Debtors ask that the sale be approved
as it will be a substantial benefit to them and their bankruptcy
estate.  As such, the Debtors project to pay 100% to their
unsecured creditors, as well as, paying their Priority claims in
full.

The Debtors have not claimed any exemption in the property.

A copy of the Offer is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4sel56q
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Wayne P. Burick and Virginia Sue Burick sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-24608) on Nov. 29, 2018.
The Debtor tapped Edgardo D. Santillan, Esq., at Santillan Law,
P.C., as counsel.


WC CUSTER CREEK: Case Summary & 15 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: WC Custer Creek Center Property, LLC
        814 Lavaca Street
        Austin, TX 78701

Business Description: WC Custer Creek Center Property, LLC
                      is primarily engaged in renting and leasing
                      real estate properties.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 2, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas

Case No.: 20-11202

Debtor's Counsel: Mark H. Ralston, Esq.
                  FISHMAN JACKSON RONQUILLO PLLC
                  Three Galleria Tower
                  13155 Noel Road, Suite 700
                  Dallas, TX 75240
                  Tel: (972) 419-5544
                  Email: mralston@fjrpllc.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Natin Paul, manager.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/WI44FKQ/WC_Custer_Creek_Center_Propeerty__txwbke-20-11202__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 15 Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. ABC Supply Co.                       Trade              $60,707
P.O. Box 742067
Atlanta, GA 30374-2067

2. Atmos Energy                         Trade                 $256
P.O. Box 790311
St. Louis, MO 63179

3. City of Plano                        Trade               $2,636
P.O. Box 861990
Plano, TX 75086

4. Environmental Lighting Service       Trade                 $833
1010 East Avenue J
Grand Prairie, TX 75050

5. Republic Services #794               Trade               $1,542
P.O. Box 78829
Phoenix, AZ 85062

6. Bizzy Bees                           Trade                 $430
3330 Keller Springs Road
Suite 230
Carrollton, TX 75006

7. Grant Leighton Landscaping           Trade               $8,385
925 22nd Street
Suite 118
Plano, TX 75074

8. All Pro Construction                 Trade             $137,255
7847 Fortune Drive
San Antonio, TX 78250

9. Triple Crown Plumbing LLC            Trade               $6,197
6829 K Avenue
Suite 106
Plano, TX 75074

10. Plano Police Department             Gov't                 $400
Alarms Unit
P.O. Box 860358
Plano, TX 75086

11. Bacon Plumbing                      Trade               $1,067
295 Ranch Trail
Rockwall, TX 75032

12. DNA Plumbing Services LLC          Trade                $4,600
542 Haggard Street
Suite 512
Plano, TX 75074

13. Integrity Porter &                Judgment             $12,039
Services, LLC
P.O. Box 761
Allen, TX 75013

14. WCRE Group                         Trade               Unknown
Austin, TX 78701

15. Westlake Indus.                    Trade               Unknown
11500 Metric Blvd
Suite 285
Austin, TX 78758


WEST PACE: Seeks Approval to Hire Hayley Redd as Realtor
--------------------------------------------------------
West Pace, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Alabama to employ Hayley Redd Real Estate
Company as realtor.

The Debtor needs the firm's assistance in the marketing of its real
properties in Alabama.

The Debtor requests approval to compensate Hayley Redd Real Estate
Company a real estate commission at the rate of 6% to be paid upon
closing of the sale. Hayley Redd Real Estate Company will share 3%
of the commission rate with 360 Real Estate, Inc., a company that
represents the purchaser of the property.

Richard Kurt Hayley, a licensed realtor of Hayley Redd Real Estate
Company, disclosed in court filings that he is a "disinterested
person" as that term is defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:
   
     Richard Kurt Hayley
     HAYLEY REDD REAL ESTATE COMPANY
     1695 East University Drive
     Auburn, AL 36830
     Telephone: (334) 821-8624
     E-mail: hayredd@gmail.com
   
                        About West Pace LLC

West Pace, LLC, a privately held company based in Auburn, Alabama,
filed its voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Ala. Case No. 20-80067) on Jan. 16,
2020. In the petition signed by Thomas M. Hayley, managing member,
the Debtor estimated to have up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million
to $10 million in liabilities. Judge William R. Sawyer oversees the
case. The Debtor tapped Michael A. Fritz, Sr., at Fritz Law Firm as
counsel and Hayley Redd Real Estate Company as realtor.


WJA ASSET: WJA SIF's Unsecureds to Be Paid From Available Cash
--------------------------------------------------------------
WJA Secure Income Fund, LLC, a California limited liability company
and a debtor affiliate of WJA Asset Management, LLC, filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Santa
Ana Division, a Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation and a Disclosure
Statement on August 13, 2020.

Class 2 General Unsecured Claims incurred in the operation of the
business of Debtor, including prepetition management fees to WJAAM
and outstanding obligations to any related Fund.  Within 120 days
of the Effective Date, the Debtor will make an initial pro rata
Distribution of the Available Cash, if any, to the holders of
Allowed Class 2 Claims.

The Debtor will make additional interim and/or final pro rata
Distributions of Available Cash to the extent Allowed Class 2
Claims are not Paid in Full by the initial Pro Rata Distribution
and provided that there is Available Cash.  The timing of such
additional Distributions will be in the discretion of the Debtor.
If there is sufficient Available Cash for all Allowed Class 2
Claims to be fully satisfied, then payments on Allowed Class 2
Claims will include simple interest at the federal judgment rate in
effect on the Effective Date from the Petition Date through the
date that each Allowed Class 2 Claim is paid in full.

Class 3 Holders of equity in the Debtor, with the percentage
interest calculated based on the total amount invested, less
distributions received on account of that investment.  After the
Effective Date and within thirty days of all required Plan payments
having been made, including Class 2 Claims being Paid in Full, and
after creating the reserves contemplated by the Plan, the Debtor
will make an initial Pro Rata Distribution of Available Cash, if
any, to the Interest Holders. If additional funds become available,
the Debtor will make additional interim Pro Rata Distributions of
Available Cash to the Interest Holders.

The Debtor will continue to liquidate its Estate assets and
distribute the proceeds and funds on hand to its Creditors and
Interest Holders as set forth in the Plan.

As of November 30, 2020, the Debtor is projected to have Available
Cash of approximately $1,081,674 and no accrued operating
liabilities other than its Professional Fee Claims and ordinary
expenses of its Estate.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated August 13, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y3voq5ad from PacerMonitor at
no charge.

Attorneys for the Debtors:

        SMILEY WANG-EKVALL, LLP
        Lei Lei Wang Ekvall
        Philip E. Strok
        Kyra E. Andrassy
        Robert S. Marticello
        3200 Park Center Drive, Suite 250
        Costa Mesa, California 92626
        Telephone: 714 445-1000
        Facsimile: 714 445-1002
        E-mail: lekvall@swelawfirm.com
                pstrok@swelawfirm.com
                kandrassy@swelawfirm.com
                rmarticello@swelawfirm.com

                    About WJA Asset Management

Luxury Asset Purchasing International, LLC, et al., are part of a
network of entities or "Funds" formed to offer a range of
investment opportunities to individuals.  Many of the existing
funds are performing and some Funds had substantial gains. However,
certain Funds, i.e., those invested in private trust deeds secured
by real estate, suffered losses.

William Jordan Investments, Inc. ("Advisor"), is a registered
investment advisor. Laguna Hills, California-based WJA Asset
Management, LLC ("Manager"), is the managing member of Luxury, et
al. William Jordan was the president and sole owner of Advisor and
was the sole member and manager of Manager.

On May 18, 2017, Luxury and its affiliates filed voluntary
petitions under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. On
May 25, 2017, four other affiliated filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions.  On June 6, 2017, CA Real Estate Opportunity Fund III
filed its Chapter 11 petition.  The Debtors' cases are jointly
administered under Bankr. C.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 17-11996, and the
Debtors continue to operate their businesses and manage their
affairs as DIP.

Pursuant to court orders, Howard Grobstein is now serving as the
chief restructuring officer of the Debtors and Mr. Jordan no longer
has any ongoing role in the Debtors' operations.

At the time of the filing, WJA estimated assets of less than
$500,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Scott C. Clarkson presides over the cases.

Lei Lei Wang Ekvall, Esq., Philip E. Strok, Esq., Robert S.
Marticello, Esq., and Michael L. Simon, Esq., at Smiley
Wang-Ekvall, LLP, serve as counsel to the Debtors.  Ann Moore of
Norton Moore Adams has been tapped as special counsel.  Elite
Properties Realty is the broker.


WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Liquidating Trust Seeks Assets DOJ Seized
-----------------------------------------------------------
Law360 reports that a liquidating trust for convicted Ponzi scammer
Robert I. Shapiro's bankrupt Woodbridge Group urged a Delaware
bankruptcy judge to reject one of the few objections to a U.S.
Department of Justice settlement that will give the trust seized
cash, jewelry and other property under a $479 million restitution
order.  U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan L. Shannon is scheduled to
convene a hearing for the settlement, which has caused little stir
on a nearly three-year-old docket opened after prosecutors shut
down Shapiro's nearly $1.3 billion, high-end property investment
scheme in late 2017.

                     About Woodbridge Group

Headquartered in Sherman Oaks, California, The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise -- http://www.woodbridgecompanies.com/-- is a
comprehensive real estate finance and development company. Its
principal business is buying, improving, and selling high-end
luxury homes. The Woodbridge Group Enterprise also owns and
operates full-service real estate brokerages, a private investment
company, and real estate lending operations. The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise and its management team have been in the business of
providing a variety of financial products for more than 35 years,
and have been primarily focused on the luxury home business for the
past five years. Since its inception, the Woodbridge Group
Enterprise has completed more than $1 billion in financial
transactions. These transactions involve real estate, note buying
and selling, hard money lending, and alternative financial
transactions involving thousands of investors.

Woodbridge Group of Companies and certain of its affiliates filed
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-12560) on Dec. 4, 2017. Woodbridge estimated assets and
liabilities at between $500 million and $1 billion. The Chapter 11
cases are being jointly administered.

Judge Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.

Samuel A. Newman, Esq., Oscar Garza, Esq., Daniel B. Denny, Esq.,
Jennifer L. Conn, Esq., Eric J. Wise, Esq., Matthew K. Kelsey,
Esq., and Matthew P. Porcelli, Esq., at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,
LLP, and Sean M. Beach, Esq., Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Ian J.
Bambrick, Esq., and Allison S. Mielke, Esq., at Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.
Homer Bonner Jacobs, PA, as special counsel, Province, Inc., as
expert consultant, Moelis & Company LLC, as investment banker.

The Debtors' financial advisors are Larry Perkins, John Farrace,
Robert Shenfeld, Reece Fulgham, Miles Staglik, and Lissa Weissman
at SierraConstellation Partners, LLC. Beilinson Advisory Group is
serving as independent management to the Debtors. Garden City
Group, LLC, is the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

Venable LLP is the Fiduciary Committee of Unitholders' legal
counsel.

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP is counsel to the Ad Hoc Group of
Noteholders, and Conway MacKenzie, Inc., as its financial advisor.


Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones is counsel to the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors; and FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as its
financial advisor.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases on Dec. 14, 2017. On Jan. 23, 2018, the Court
approved a settlement providing for the formation of an ad hoc
noteholder group and an ad hoc unitholder group.





WOODBRIDGE GROUP: Steven Sexton Must Disgorge $270,000
------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, v. SEXTON ADVISORY GROUP, INC., and STEVEN M. SEXTON,
Defendants, Case No. 5:20-cv-01806-JGB-KKx (C.D. Cal.), District
Judge Jesus G. Bernal ordered that Defendant Steven M. Sexton is
permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the
Securities Act [15 U.S.C. section 77e] and Section 15(a) of the
Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. section 78o(a)].

The SEC, having filed the Complaint and Defendant Steven M. Sexton
having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's
jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action;
consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or
denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to
jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and
waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment.

The Defendant is jointly and severally liable with defendant Sexton
Advisory Group, Inc. for disgorgement of $244,653.70, representing
profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the SEC
Complaint, together with prejudgment interest in the amount of
$27,137.70, for a total of $271,791.40, which shall be partially
offset by $251,826.74, the amount that SAG previously paid to the
Trustees of the Woodbridge Liquidation Trust, the successor in
interest to the Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC, related to a
case pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court of the District
of Delaware entitled In re Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC, el
al., No. 17-12560-KJC.

The Defendant is also liable for a civil penalty in the amount of
$30,000 under Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C.
section 77t(d)]). The Defendant must satisfy this obligation by
paying $49,964.66 to the SEC.

Judge Robles held that the Commission may enforce the Court's
judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for
civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures
authorized by law) at any time after 30 days following entry of
this Final Judgment. The Defendant must pay post judgment interest
on any delinquent amounts. The Commission shall hold the funds,
together with any interest and income earned thereon pending
further order of the Court.

A Fair Fund is established pursuant to Section 308(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act of
2010 [15 U.S.C. section 7246(a)], from the funds deposited with the
Commission pursuant to Defendant's final judgment in this matter,
plus interest earned on those funds.

The funds deposited with the Commission in this matter will be
transferred to the Liquidation Trust created by the Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Plan in the In Re Woodbridge Group of Companies, LLC, et
al., Case No. 17-12560-KJC (D. DE) (Jointly Administered)
bankruptcy proceeding, to be distributed in accordance with the
Liquidation Plan approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

A copy of the Court's Final Judgment is available at
https://bit.ly/3dmC1pW from Leagle.com.

                   About Woodbridge Group

Headquartered in Sherman Oaks, California, The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise -- http://www.woodbridgecompanies.com/--  was a
comprehensive real estate finance and development company.  Its
principal business was buying, improving, and selling high-end
luxury homes.  The Woodbridge Group Enterprise also owned and
operated full-service real estate brokerages, a private investment
company, and real estate lending operations.  The Woodbridge Group
Enterprise and its management team had been in the business of
providing a variety of financial products for more than 35 years,
and had been primarily focused on the luxury home business for the
past five years.  Since its inception, the Woodbridge Group
Enterprise has completed more than $1 billion in financial
transactions.  These transactions involved real estate, note
buying
and selling, hard money lending, and alternative financial
transactions involving thousands of investors.

Woodbridge filed for bankruptcy as a result of a massive,
multi-year Ponzi scheme perpetrated by Robert Shapiro between (at
least) 2012 and 2017.  As part of this fraud, Shapiro, through the
Woodbridge entities, raised over one billion dollars from
approximately 10,000 investors -- as either noteholders or
unitholders.

Woodbridge Group of Companies and certain of its affiliates filed
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
17-12560) on Dec. 4, 2017.  Woodbridge estimated assets and
liabilities at between $500 million and $1 billion.  The Chapter
11
cases are being jointly administered.  Judge Kevin J. Carey
presides over the case.

Samuel A. Newman, Esq., Oscar Garza, Esq., Daniel B. Denny, Esq.,
Jennifer L. Conn, Esq., Eric J. Wise, Esq., Matthew K. Kelsey,
Esq., and Matthew P. Porcelli, Esq., at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,
LLP, and Sean M. Beach, Esq., Edmon L. Morton, Esq., Ian J.
Bambrick, Esq., and Allison S. Mielke, Esq., at Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, served as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.
Homer Bonner Jacobs, PA, served as special counsel; Province,
Inc.,
as expert consultant; and Moelis & Company LLC, as investment
banker.

The Debtors' financial advisors were Larry Perkins, John Farrace,
Robert Shenfeld, Reece Fulgham, Miles Staglik, and Lissa Weissman
at SierraConstellation Partners, LLC.  Beilinson Advisory Group
served as independent management to the Debtors.  Garden City
Group, LLC, served as the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Chapter 11 cases on Dec. 14, 2017.  Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones
served as counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors;
and FTI Consulting, Inc., acted as its financial advisor.

On Jan. 23, 2018, the Court approved a settlement providing for
the
formation of an ad hoc noteholder group and an ad hoc unitholder
group.

Woodbridge Group said that effective as of February 15, 2019, it
has emerged from chapter 11 bankruptcy following confirmation of
its plan of liquidation.  The Plan was confirmed on October 26,
2018.


YUMA ENERGY: Bankruptcy Case Converted to Chapter 7 Liquidation
---------------------------------------------------------------
Yuma Energy, Inc. (OTC Pink: YUMAQ), together with its subsidiaries
Yuma Exploration and Production Company, Inc., Davis Petroleum
Corp., and The Yuma Companies, Inc. (collectively, the Company and
the filing subsidiaries, the "Debtors"), announced Oct. 20 that its
voluntary Chapter 11 petition for relief under the United States
Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas (the "Bankruptcy Court"), filed on April 15, 2020
, has been converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation.

The Debtors intended to use the Chapter 11 process to implement the
orderly liquidation of their assets in an effort to maximize values
and recoveries for all stakeholders and subsequently obtained court
approval to conduct an auction for  all of their assets, which
primarily consist of operating and non-operating interests in
several properties located in Louisiana , Texas , Wyoming and
Oklahoma (the "Properties").

Unfortunately, as a result of the severe downturn in commodity
prices,  multiple operating issues affecting production and
operating costs, the inability of Debtors to conduct remedial well
operations to maintain cash flows, general industry conditions and
other factors, bids received for the Properties were minimal and
the auction was canceled. Additionally, the secured creditor, YE
Investment, LLC ("YEI") an affiliate of Red Mountain Capital
Partners LLC and the Unsecured Creditors Committee ("UCC") were
unable to resolve disputes.  Subsequently, with the concurrence of
YEI and the UCC, the Company engaged in discussions with a
potential acquiror in an attempt to reorganize through a business
sale.  The potential acquiror terminated these discussions on
October 13, 2020.

Having no further viable options, the Bankruptcy Court issued an
order approving the conversion of the Chapter 11 cases of the
Debtors to Chapter 7 liquidations on October 19, 2020 Concurrent
with the appointment of a Chapter 7 Trustee, Mr. Anthony C. Schnur
(Yuma's Chief Restructuring Officer) and the Company's Directors
will no longer control the Debtors, including any operation of the
Debtors, the liquidation of assets, and the resolution of
liabilities.

Copies of all documents filed in this case can be accessed at no
charge through Stretto, the Debtors' claims & noticing agent (at
https://cases.stretto.com/yumaenergy ). For questions, Stretto can
be contacted by email at TeamYumaEnergy@stretto.com or toll-free at
855-303-9310. Stretto cannot give legal or financial advice.

                         Going Concern

Due to the difficult financial circumstances, the Company has been
unable to file an annual report on Form 10-K as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2019 or its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q as of
and for the quarters ended March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2020 .  The
Company's audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2018 included a going concern qualification. The
risk factors and uncertainties described in the Company's SEC
filings for the year ended December 31, 2018 and subsequent
quarters raised substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  In connection with the Chapter 7
proceedings, the Company will no longer operate as a going
concern.

                           About Yuma Energy, Inc.

Yuma Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was an independent
Houston -based exploration and production company focused on
acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources.  Historically, the
Company's activities have focused on inland water and onshore
properties, primarily located in central and southern Louisiana and
southeastern Texas .  Its common stock has traded on the
over-the-counter, OTC Pink marketplace ("OTC Pink"), under the
trading symbol "YUMAQ."


ZACHAIR LTD: Plan Exclusivity Extended Until January 12
-------------------------------------------------------
At the behest of Zachair, Ltd., Judge Thomas J. Catliota of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland extended the
period within which the Debtor has the exclusive right to file a
plan of reorganization through and including January 12, 2021, and
to solicit acceptances of the plan through and including March 14,
2021.

Since the Petition Date, the key to the Debtor's Chapter 11 case is
the sale of the 423-acre property, operating as an airfield known
as Hyde Field.  Properly marketed, the Property will generate sale
proceeds sufficient to pay all of the Debtor's creditors in full,
with interest. The Debtor made substantial progress during the
seven-month pendency of the case, and the Debtor concluded its
selection of a property broker, obtained Court approval of the
broker, Fraser Forbes, and commenced a marketing process for the
Property which is now well underway.

The extended exclusivity provides this vital assurance by
preventing the uncertainty and confusion that the potential for
competing plans would create. With the initial marketing materials
sent by the Debtor's broker, the prospective purchasers gain
assurance that if they invest the necessary time and resources in
the Debtor's sale process, they will have a full and fair
opportunity to compete for the Property.

Also, the extension will allow the Debtor to obtain the highest and
best value for the Property and to continue to implement its
marketing process which will result in the sale of the Property,
for an amount sufficient to repay all creditors in full.

Portions of the Property not used in Airfield operations previously
were mined for sand and gravel. The cavities created by the sand
and gravel mining were used for surcharge fill operations, where
the Debtor contracted for the acceptance of clean fill dirt removed
from other third-party sites in exchange for a fee. The Debtor was
advised by the Maryland Department of the Environment in early
March 2020 that the surcharge operations must cease. The Debtor
worked with its consultants and counsel to ensure compliance with
MDE's directives, to stabilize the final surcharge grade in the
area of fill operations, and to permit the Debtor to proceed
expeditiously with its sale.

Further, the Debtor has continued to work cooperatively with its
lender, Sandy Spring Bank, to achieve the consensual use of the
Bank's cash collateral during the case. Since the First Exclusivity
Motion, the Debtor and the Bank have negotiated and agreed on the
terms of two consensual cash collateral orders and accompanying
cash collateral budgets, including the negotiations with PD Hyde.
The Debtor has complied with the terms of all agreed cash
collateral orders and has proactively managed its expenses in this
case, particularly following the cessation of its surcharge fill
operations.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3jSIPhy at no extra charge.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3jWrSCV at no extra charge.

                       About Zachair Ltd.

Clinton, Maryland-based Zachair, Ltd. -- http://www.hydefield.com/
-- was formed by Dr. Nabil Asterbadi to acquire Hyde Field, an
airport for commercial and general aviation.  Hyde Field is located
near Andrews Air Force Base, National Harbor, Downtown Washington
DC, and nearby Northern Virginia.  It offers a 3000 lighted runway
with a day and night instrument approach.

Zachair, Ltd. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
20-10691) on Jan. 17, 2020.  In the petition signed by Zachair
President Nabil J. Asterbadi, Debtor was estimated to have $10
million to $50 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  

Judge Thomas J. Catliota oversees the case. The Debtor tapped
Whiteford Taylor & Preston, LLP as legal counsel and Fraser Forbes
Company LLC as real estate agent and broker.


ZENERGY BRANDS: Asks Court to Extend Plan Exclusivity Thru Nov. 17
------------------------------------------------------------------
Zenergy Brands, Inc. and its affiliates request the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, to
extend the exclusive periods during which the Debtors may file a
Chapter 11 plan through and including November 17, 2020, and to
solicit acceptances for the plan through and including January 15,
2021.  

The Debtors cite these compelling reasons to extend their
exclusivity periods:

     (i) Factors outside of the Debtors' control have impacted the
filed Plan and the Debtors' ability to confirm that Plan as it was
originally envisioned. Specifically, a receiver was appointed over
TCA Global Credit Master Fund, L.P., which impacts TCA's ability to
provide exit financing contemplated under the Plan. The Debtors
have been working diligently to assess alternatives, a task that
has been complicated by the significant disruption in the market
due to precautionary measures to contain the spread of COVID-19;

    (ii) The Debtors have identified a third-party lender willing
and able to finance the Debtors and the Debtors are still
negotiating the terms of said financing. As the final terms of the
financing will impact the Debtors' alternatives, it is essential
that the Debtors have the ability; and

   (iii) The relief requested will enable the Debtors to continue
focusing on pursuing a value-maximizing process rather than
spending time and money on a competing-plan process. The Debtors
will continue to work diligently with their stakeholders to avoid
unnecessary plan disputes.

Since the appointment of the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors, the Debtors have been working with the Committee and
their senior secured lenders, TCA Global Credit Master Fund, L.P.,
and DIP lender, TCA Special Situations Credit Strategies ICAV, to
structure a chapter 11 plan of reorganization or transaction that
is acceptable to TCA, the Committee, and the Debtors.  On March 16,
2020, the Debtors filed their Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
Statement.  On March 19, 2020, the Court entered the Order (I)
Conditionally Approving the Disclosure Statement; (II) Establishing
Procedures for Solicitation and Tabulation of Votes on Plan; and
(III) Scheduling a Combined Hearing on Approval of the Disclosure
Statement and Confirmation of Plan.  TCA was contemplated as
providing exit financing as part of the Plan.

The Debtors solicited votes with the respect to their filed Plan
and received a voting class supporting the Plan. However, on May
11, 2020, the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Florida entered an order appointing a receiver over TCA
Global and certain related entities. The Debtors understand that
the appointment of the receiver impacts TCA's ability to fulfill
its obligations under the negotiated Plan.

In light of this development, the Debtors have been negotiating
with various third parties to obtain funding for the Debtors. The
Debtors have had a number of constructive discussions and
identified a third-party lender willing to lend to the Debtors and
are working with the Debtors' management to structure a bankruptcy
exit.

The Debtors need the additional time to finalize negotiations with
the third-party lender and determine whether to pursue a plan or
sale process and also to chart an exit from bankruptcy without
distraction from the disruption caused by an alternative plan
process.

A hearing on the extension request was continued to November 3 from
October 20.
              
A copy of the Debtors' Motion to Extend is available from
stretto.com at https://bit.ly/34XVjy3 at no extra charge.  

                   About Zenergy Brands Inc.

Zenergy Brands, Inc. -- https://whatiszenergy.com/ -- is a
next-generation energy and technology company engaged in selling
energy-conservation products and services to commercial, industrial
and municipal customers. It is a business-to-business company whose
platform is a combined offering of energy services and smart
controls. Zenergy Brands is a public company, fully reporting to
the Securities and Exchange Commission and trading on the OTCQB.

Zenergy Brands and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-42886)
on Oct. 24, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, Zenergy Brands had total
assets of $1,944,089 and liabilities of $8,369,818.

Judge Brenda T. Rhoades oversees the cases. The Debtors tapped
Foley & Lardner LLP as their legal counsel, and Stretto as their
claims, noticing, and solicitation agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has appointed creditors to serve on
the Official Committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee is
represented by Kane Russell Coleman Logan PC.


[*] Bankruptcies in New Hampshire Hit New Low in October 2020
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Sanders of NH Business Review reports that bankruptcy filings
in October hit yet another record low in New Hampshire.  Some 66
businesses and individuals filed for protection, the lowest number
of any month since the three months in 1988, when stricter
bankruptcy laws were about to take effect.

The new low beat the previous modern record, set in September, by
five.

Indeed, despite the high unemployment and the phase-out of both
federal and state assistance to individuals and businesses, the
number of bankruptcies has remained low for seven straight months,
starting in April, just after the pandemic struck the state.

Bankruptcy attorneys have said they expected their business to pick
up in the fall once the loss of aid was felt.  But most of that aid
disappeared months ago and filings, instead of going up, are going
down.

October 2020's 66 filings are 60% lower than the 166 recorded in
October 2019, when the economy was at full throttle. This decrease
brings the monthly average of filings to under 93. Last year, the
monthly average was 148.

And, despite the high-profile bankruptcy filed by LRGHealthcare –
a group of hospital and healthcare facilities in the Lakes Region
– there have been very few business bankruptcies filed during the
year as well.

In September 2020, there were two, and in October there were only
one two as well. Besides LRGHealthcare, a restaurant near the
Strawberry Banke in Portsmouth.

That was Mombo LLC, Portsmouth, which filed for Chapter 11
reorganization Oct. 6. It reported assets of $15,338 and
liabilities of $275,279.

LRGHealthcare, which filed for Chapter 11 on Oct. 19, 2020,
reported assets and liabilities of between $100 million and $500
million.


[*] Winning Solutions for Suppliers in a Zero-Sum Game
------------------------------------------------------
David Conaway of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP wrote an article on
JDSupra titled "Client Alert: Chapter 11 Filings Surge: Winning
Solutions for Suppliers in a Zero-Sum Game."

According to the American Bankruptcy Institute, 3,600 companies
filed Chapter 11 in the first half of 2020. Chapter 11 filings for
2020 are on pace to eclipse any year since 2012. During the same
period, businesses worldwide sold $2.1 trillion of bonds, up 50
percent from 2019, according to the July 17, 2020 New York Times.

In a number of key U.S. industries (e.g., automotive, aviation,
dairy, energy, retail, hospitality), existing market conditions
and/or COVID-19 have caused significant disruptions in operations,
roiling EBITDA and asset values, and restricting access to
financial liquidity.  In short, the pie is smaller yet the forks at
the table are the same. It is the ultimate zero-sum game with
intense competition over allocation of value to stakeholders.

Companies are well-advised to prepare for a significant increase
not only in the number of restructurings or Chapter 11 filings but
also more difficult ones, with respect to their customers, supply
chain partners, and contract counter-parties.

Chapter 11 filings create risk for: (1) payment of pre-bankruptcy
accounts receivable, (2) payment of invoices for goods and services
provided during the Chapter 11 case, (3) continuation of important
contracts with the debtors, and (4) retaining invoice payments
received 90 days prior to the Chapter 11 filing.  Specifically,
Chapter 11 filings of debtors have the following impacts on their
counter-parties:

1.  PRE-CHAPTER 11 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE. Accounts receivable owed
prior to the Chapter 11 filing often receive little or no payment,
and result in a write-off. This is because Bankruptcy Code Section
362 prohibits all collection activities on pre-petition debt,
allowing debtors to shelve unsecured debt, to be addressed in a
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization or Liquidation in the event of a
Section 363 sale of assets.  

Sources of Payment. There are only two realistic sources of payment
for unsecured claims of trade creditors (other than Section
503(b)(9) claims, discussed below):

a.  Cash flow from debtors’ ongoing business operations arising
from a confirmed plan of reorganization, or

b.  Sales proceeds in excess of secured debt and the costs of
administration (post-petition goods and services and professional
fees).

The "Type" of Chapter 11 Makes a Difference. In the case of a
reorganization, there have been a number of "balance sheet
restructurings" where massive "capital structure" debts have
essentially been converted to equity, and trade creditors "ride
through" the Chapter 11 case being paid unabated in the ordinary
course of business. In a far greater number of cases, the
companies’ financial distress is such that a write-off of ALL
pre-petition debt is essential to survive. In these cases, plans of
reorganization often provide pennies on the dollar, or maybe even a
small slice of the reorganized debtors' equity. Any true
reorganization requires the ongoing financial support of the
working capital and term lenders. In most of the large, recent
Chapter 11 cases, particularly in troubled industries with rapidly
changing market dynamics (e.g., Borden Dairy, Dean Foods, LSC
Communications), these lenders are alternatively seeking an exit
strategy, usually a Section 363 sale of all of the debtors’
assets. Keeping in mind that the secured lenders’ target sales
price is the amount of their debt, plus transaction costs and maybe
some of the costs of administration, the sales process (marketing,
bidding, and auction) often does not produce good results for trade
creditors. In many cases, the lenders credit bid their debt to
acquire the assets to kick the can for a better recovery if
conditions improve. Credit bids never exceed the secured debt,
leaving no value for other stakeholders, unless the lender elects
to contribute to their recoveries.

Chapter 11 cases that feature a Section 363 sale put payment of
pre-petition claims of unsecured creditors at extreme risk, and
payment of costs of administration are often at high risk.

Creditor "Remedies." Creditors' best options for payment of their
pre-petition claims are asserting a Section 503(b)(9) claim for
goods provided to the debtor within 20 days prior to the Chapter 11
filing, payment as a critical vendor, and the exercise of rights of
setoff or recoupment relating to any amounts owed to the debtor
such as rebates, sales incentives or account credit.

a.  20 Day Administrative Claim. Under  Section 503(b)(9) of the
Bankruptcy Code, sellers of goods are entitled to an administrative
expense priority claim for the value of goods delivered to and
received by a debtor within 20 days prior to the bankruptcy filing.
Generally, such claims fare significantly better than general
unsecured claims, and often receive 100 percent payment.

However, in cases where the debtor’s Chapter 11 proceeding is
"administratively insolvent," the likelihood of payment of
administrative expense priority claims is compromised.

b.  Critical Vendor. Becoming a critical vendor is a creditor
remedy based on a theory that a particular vendor is so essential
to a debtor's ability to continue operating that without the
uninterrupted flow of the seller's goods, the debtor cannot
continue to operate and thus has no realistic chance of a
successful reorganization. A bankruptcy court has broad authority
to order relief that facilitates a successful reorganization.

Only a debtor can make the determination that a particular vendor
is critical and seek court approval of the same. A creditor cannot
independently impose its critical vendor status on a debtor.

Some jurisdictions refuse to entertain critical vendor motions.
However, Delaware and New York continue to be jurisdictions where
critical vendor payments can be approved in appropriate
circumstances.

Point of Interest: Texas has recently become a Chapter 11 hub,
based in large part on the troubled energy sector and also on the
efforts of Judge David Jones (a North Carolinian) whom the
September 1, 2020 Houston Chronicle reports "saved the Texas
bankruptcy practice." We currently have four significant cases
pending before Judge Jones, Dean Foods, McDermott International,
Neiman Marcus and Technicolor (Chapter 15).

Vendors who are truly critical to a debtor-customer should continue
to seek critical vendor status as a means of getting paid. In doing
so, vendors should be careful to not violate the automatic stay by
conditioning future business on payment of pre-petition debt.
Moreover, vendors should be aware that getting paid as a critical
vendor will likely be conditioned on providing normal lines of
credit, pricing and terms, or other "customary trade practices."

It is most important that vendors calculate the amount and risk of
payment of the required post-petition extensions of credit,
compared to the amount of the critical vendor payment. There have
been numerous recent instances where vendors have elected to not
accept critical vendor payments due to the amount and risk of the
post-petition extensions of credit.  

c.  Setoff and Recoupment. Setoff, an often overlooked remedy,
arises from the settlement of mutual debts or accounts owed between
a debtor and a creditor. Simply, if A owes B $100 and B owes A $50,
then the debts can be resolved as follows: $100 - $50 = $50, so A
pays B $50 and the accounts are settled. The Bankruptcy Code
codifies this common law remedy and in fact, provides that the
creditor has a secured claim to the extent of the value of its
setoff claim.

The debts that are owed must be owed to and from precisely the same
legal entities and the debts must arise either both pre-petition or
both post-petition. The debts do not, however, have to arise out of
the same transaction. Triangular setoffs are not allowed in Chapter
11, though are generally enforceable outside of bankruptcy.  

The exercise of a setoff remedy requires relief from the automatic
stay from the Bankruptcy Court. Moreover, there are somewhat
complicated rules regarding exercise of setoff during the 90 days
prior to the bankruptcy filing, which if not followed, could result
in preference exposure. Good legal advice on this point is
essential.

Recoupment is similar to setoff, except that the mutual debts must
arise from the same transaction.

We have noted a significant increase of sales contracts providing
rebates and other sales incentives to the customer. Under
applicable law, suppliers may setoff or recoup these obligations
owed to customers against the accounts receivable owed. This
effectively provides the supplier a 100 percent recovery to the
extent of the setoff or recouped amount.

Upon a Chapter 11 filing, suppliers should press pause on issuing
rebate payments to first evaluate potential setoff rights.

2.  POST-PETITION SALES. Post-petition sales to Chapter 11 debtors
are inherently high risk. In addition to operational and financial
risks, there are risks created by the Chapter 11 process and the
Bankruptcy Code.

a.  Costs of Administration. Post-petition sales are costs of
administration under the Bankruptcy Code, which are junior in
priority to lenders’ secured claims, but ahead of all other
classes of creditors. Moreover, the Bankruptcy Code requires that
costs of administration be paid as a condition of confirmation of a
plan of reorganization. There is no such requirement in a Section
363 sale, unless lenders or buyers are compelled to assume the
liabilities or fund a plan of liquidation. As a result, in Section
363 sales, whether costs of administration will actually be paid
depends on asset values and if lenders or buyers assume liabilities
or fund a plan of liquidation.  

With more financially stressed Chapter 11’s on the horizon, it is
predictable that lenders and buyers will resist such funding, to
conserve cash.

b.  Liquidity. Liquidity during the Chapter 11 case is dependent on
debtor in possession (DIP) financing, which is discretionary and
often based on a strained lender-borrower relationship. The
critical 13-week budget attached as an exhibit to the DIP financing
documents is often razor thin, leaving little or no margin for
error.

c.  Management Authority. The decision making authority of the
debtors' management, with whom creditors have the historical
business relationship, is compromised, as other stakeholders,
including lenders, private equity sponsors, and potential buyers,
are able to influence business decisions in Chapter 11.

d.  The Liquidity Slide. Even if there is sufficient liquidity
initially in the Chapter 11 case, it can deteriorate as the case
progresses.

In the Dean Foods Chapter 11 case, pending in Texas, the debtors
filed a number of first day motions including approval of DIP
financing, that was presented as providing sufficient "runway" for
Dean to achieve a successful Chapter 11 reorganization or a
"successful" Section 363 sale. Dean also filed a first day motion
to prohibit contract counter-parties from altering their contracts,
including the obligations to continue providing goods and services,
on credit terms. Dean asserted that the Bankruptcy Code prohibits a
contract party from terminating or modifying the contract, period.
Actually, the Bankruptcy Code provides that contracts cannot be
terminated or modified "solely because of a provision in such
contract . . . that is conditioned on" the insolvency of the
debtor, the commencement of the case, or the appointment of a
trustee. Moreover, the Bankruptcy Code provides that this
limitation is not applicable "if . . . applicable law excuses a
party, other than the debtor . . . from rendering performance . .
.." Section 2-609 and 2-702 of the Uniform Commercial Code is
"applicable law" that protects suppliers. However, in Dean Foods,
on day one, vendors' rights to withhold shipment or credit terms
were impaired, without regard to increased risk of payment later in
the Chapter 11 case.  

Fast forward to July, 2020, Dean Foods filed a proposed
"administrative claims protocol" offering to pay administrative
claims at a 20 percent discount, including the post-petition
invoices that Dean failed to pay, and the Section 363 sale buyer
refused to assume such liabilities. The administrative protocol
indicates that Dean is or may become administratively insolvent,
meaning it does not have or may not have sufficient assets to pay
Section 503(b)(9) claims and unpaid post-petition invoices in full.
Yet, vendors’ rights in that regard were impaired on the first
day of the Chapter 11 case.

The use of administrative protocols to administrative claims is a
growing trend, used also in Toys R Us and Sears. Suppliers are
well-advised to anticipate this possibility in making business
decisions at the outset of a Chapter 11 filing.  

e.  Super-priority Administrative Claims Impact Suppliers. In
virtually all DIP financings, lenders obtain a "super-priority"
administrative claim that has priority over all other
administrative claims, including Section 503(b)(9) claims and
unpaid post-petition invoices. Professional fees are often
structured as "carve-outs" from the lenders' super-priority
administrative claims effectively elevating professional fees above
other administrative claims.

f.  Section 363 Sale Asset Purchase Agreements. In the event of a
Section 363 sale, usually asset purchase agreements specifically
exclude assumption of all pre-closing liabilities, including
administrative claims based on Section 503(b)(9) and unpaid
post-petition invoices. Buyers assert that such claims are
obligations of the debtors’ estates.

g.  Risk Mitigation. Trade creditors must carefully evaluate these
risk factors for post-petition sales during all phases of Chapter
11 cases. For material exposures, vendors need to engage, and
possibly object to first day motions. If extending credit terms is
too risky, the simplest strategy is to ship goods on a cash before
delivery basis.

Generally, if a vendor is selling on the basis of purchase orders
and invoices, there is no obligation to ship goods or to extend
credit terms. However, if the parties are doing business under a
sales or supply agreement, debtors will assert that the Bankruptcy
Code requires the vendor to continue shipping goods and provide
historical credit terms. Trade creditors can assert that Sections
2-609 and 2-702 of the Uniform Commercial Code provide for a
suspension of seller’s performance obligations (shipment and/or
credit terms) and for cash before delivery shipments upon
insolvency, regardless of the contract terms.

3.  EXECUTORY CONTRACTS. Executory Contract is the Bankruptcy Code
term given to essentially any contract between a debtor and a
non-debtor party where both parties owe material performance to the
other. A supply contract or other sales agreement almost always
meets the requirements of an executory contract under the
Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Code Rules for rejecting executory
contracts are debtor-friendly which is often incentive for Chapter
11 filings, particularly retail filings.

The Bankruptcy Code provides debtors the unfettered right to assume
or reject executory contracts and leases. If a debtor rejects an
executory contract, the non-debtor party receives a general
unsecured claim for damages arising from the debtor's "breach" of
contract. Thus, a debtor escapes the contract with little cost. On
the other hand, the debtor also has the right to assume or assume
and assign a contract. In this instance, the Bankruptcy Code
requires that the debtor "cure" the contract by paying existing
defaults. Presumably, debtors, or Section 363 sale buyers, would
assume contracts that they deem to be valuable either because they
insure an uninterrupted supply of goods or contain favorable
pricing or terms. For a creditor who is a party to an executory
contract, the assumption of such contract can be an effective
vehicle to obtain payment of pre-petition debt.

In many Section 363 sales, buyers elect to assume only absolutely
essential contracts to avoid payment of the cure costs. Instead,
buyers reject many contracts and attempt to negotiate with
suppliers separately for revised contracts, and no cure payment.

The Bankruptcy Code requires that the non-debtor party to an
executory contract must continue to perform its obligations under
the contract during the Chapter 11 case pending the debtor's
decision to assume or reject such contract, and provided that the
debtor is in fact performing its obligations of the contract
post-petition.  

Generally, the obligation to continue performance is subject to a
seller's UCC Article 2 rights including UCC 2-609 and UCC 2-702,
though Chapter 11 debtors often challenge this (usually at the
behest of their financiers), though as indicated from the Dean
Foods case, creditors will likely need to object to first day
motions.

Please note my article, When Worlds Collide: Article 2 of The
Uniform Commercial Code and Chapter 11, for a deeper dive on the
interplay between the Bankruptcy Code and a supplier's rights under
the Uniform Commercial Code.

Please note my article, Dumbing Down Intellectual Property: Chapter
11 Impact on IP License Agreements, regarding the impact of the
Chapter 11 on licensing agreements.

4.  CHAPTER 11 AVOIDANCE ACTIONS: KEEPING PRE-PETITION PAYMENTS.

a.  Preferences. Bankruptcy Code Section 547 allows the debtor to
recover pre-petition payments to third parties that were made
within 90 days prior to filing as to non-insiders and within one
(1) year prior to filing with respect to insiders. The requirements
to assert a preference are that the payment in question be made
within the appropriate time period, made while the debtor is
insolvent, the payment is on account of antecedent debt and the
payment allows the creditor to receive more than it would in
Chapter 7 liquidation. Debtors or trustees pursuing preference
claims rarely have difficulty establishing these basic
requirements.

Preference claims are normally highly defendable based on statutory
defenses.  Creditors who have received allegedly preferential
payments have several defenses, the most common three being that:
(1) the payment was made in the ordinary course of business, (2)
the creditor provided subsequent new value after the payment at
issue, or (3) the payment constituted a contemporaneous exchange
for value.  

The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA) contained
amendments to preference laws, applicable to all Chapter 11 cases.
In asserting preference claims, the Chapter 11 debtor now must
exercise reasonable due diligence, taking a creditor’s defenses
into account. Also, for claims of $25,000 or less, the Chapter 11
debtor must assert the claim in the creditor’s jurisdiction.

Upon a customer's Chapter 11 filing, suppliers should assess and
understand the potential preference risk as part of the overall
customer risk profile, in connection with its internal accounting
decisions and its strategy for doing business with the customer in
Chapter 11. To do this, suppliers must analyze their subsequent new
value “credit” and whether the payments received were in the
"ordinary course of business" consistent with Chapter 11 case
decisions and analytical methodologies.

b.  Fraudulent Transfers. Fraudulent transfers are a partial
misnomer because fraud is not required. Under Bankruptcy Code, the
debtor can recover payments made to creditors occurring within two
years of the bankruptcy filing, that were made for "less than
reasonably equivalent value." A debtor can also use applicable
state law to avoid certain transfers under similar legal
principles. This is particularly important with respect to
fraudulent transfers as most states have a two to six year
"look-back" period, which often exceeds the two-year look-back
period available under the Bankruptcy Code.

Fraudulent transfer claims against vendors are not as common as
preference claims. However, we have seen these claims asserted when
the customer has numerous affiliates and a supplier invoices one
entity, but payment to the supplier is made from a parent of the
affiliate under a consolidated cash management system. Technically,
the parent received no value for the payment to the supplier.

We successfully defeated a fraudulent transfer claim by
establishing that pursuant to a company group cash management
system, affiliate cash was swept upstream to the parent, but
redistributed to affiliates to fund operations.

c.  Unauthorized Post-Petition Transfers. The Bankruptcy Code
allows Chapter 11 debtors, or more likely, their residual estates
after a Section 363 sale, to recover post-petition payments to
vendors that were not approved by the Bankruptcy Court. This would
include (1) payments on post-petition transactions that were
outside the ordinary course of business between the supplier and
customer, or payments were made without court-approved DIP
financing or an order allowing the customer’s use of the
lender’s cash collateral, and (2) post-petition payments of
pre-petition claims in the absence of a critical vendor or other
court order allowing payment of pre-petition claims. It is
important for suppliers doing business with Chapter 11 customers to
verify that the payments they will receive have been authorized by
the Bankruptcy Court. Otherwise, the payments may be subject to
later disgorgement.  

In light of the likelihood of a substantially greater number of
Chapter 11 filings in the coming years, and the heightened
financial stress and challenges these cases will present, suppliers
to and customers of Chapter 11 debtors should be prepared with
knowledge of the areas of risk and the best strategies for
mitigating such risk. This will include pro-active engagement from
the beginning.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***