---

         T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, October 21, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 294

                            Headlines

1769 LLC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
AAG FH: S&P Affirms 'B-' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Negative
ADOMANI INC: Discloses Substantial Doubt on Staying Going Concern
ADVAXIS INC: Agrees to Issue 3M Shares in Exchange for Warrants
AEROCENTURY CORP: Has $13.5-Mil. Net Loss for the June 30 Quarter

AKORN INC: Financial Status, Chapter 11 Cast Going Concern Doubt
ALLIED ESPORTS: Incurs $10.9MM Net Loss for Quarter Ended June 30
ALPHA INVESTMENT: Incurs $219K Net Loss for Quarter Ended June 30
ALPHATEC HOLDINGS: Grosses $115 Million from Common Stock Offering
AMC ENTERTAINMENT: Reports $561.2M Net Loss for June 30 Quarter

AMERGENT HOSPITALITY: Discloses Substantial Going Concern Doubt
AMERI HOLDINGS: Has Substantial Doubt on Staying as Going Concern
ANCHORAGE MIDTOWN: 10 Days' Notice for Hearing on Any Proposed Sale
ANGEL LARA: Long Beach Property Valued at $545,000
APPLIED ENERGETICS: Reports $1.4-Mil. Net Loss for June 30 Quarter

ARANDELL HOLDINGS: Nov. 18 Auction of Substantially All Assets
ARDENT CYBER: Wants Plan Exclusivity Extended Until 2021
AYRO INC: Extends Investors' Deadline to Purchase Additional Shares
BARD COLLEGE: S&P Rates 2020A Bonds 'BB+'; Outlook Negative
BROOKSIDE PERSONAL CARE: Court Says No Need to Appoint PCO

BURLESON HOME: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CBAK ENERGY: Amends Promissory Notes with Atlas Sciences
CHARITY TOWING: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
CHRISTOPHER D COLLINS: Says PCO Not Necessary
CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS: Maple Buying Laguna Beach Property for $2M

CINEMARK HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B' on Film Delays
CIVITAS HEALTH: JCAHO Accreditation Underway
DEKALB-JACKSON WATER: S&P Raises Revenue Debt Rating to 'BB'
DELCATH SYSTEMS: Authorized Common Shares Increased to 4.1 Million
DIAMOND (BC) BV: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B-'; Outlook Stable

DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE: U.S. Trustee Appoints Committee
DRAFT BARS: Triable Issue Exists on Unjust Enrichment Claim vs ABL
EARTH ENERGY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ED'S BEANS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
EVEREST REAL ESTATE: PCO Says Quality of Care Maintained

FC COMPASSUS: S&P Affirms 'B' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
FIRST FLORIDA: PCO Finds Care Within Standards Amid COVID-19
FLORENCE F. SMITH: Appeal to Contest Trustee Appointment Untimely
FORTOVIA THERAPEUTICS: $160K Sale of Gelclair to Helsinn Okayed
FORTOVIA THERAPEUTICS: $225K Sale of Oravig Assets to Galt Approved

FORTOVIA THERAPEUTICS: Sale of Soltamox Assets to Mayne Approved
FOURTH QUARTER PROPERTIES: Seeks 2021 Plan Exclusivity Extension
FREEMAN HOLDINGS: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Until Dec. 14
FREEMAN MOBILE: May Use Bank of America's Cash Collateral
FREEMAN MOBILE: May Use Woodforest National Bank's Cash Collateral

GATEWAY FOUR: Appointment of Gottlieb as Chapter 11 Trustee Okayed
GAVILAN RESOURCES: Seeks Plan Exclusivity Extension Thru Nov. 13
GB SCIENCES: Expects Patent to be Issued Within 3 to 12 Weeks
GKS CORP: PCO Convinced Bidders on Residents' Rental Subsidy
GODFREY C. DOUGLAS: Suit vs Dry Clean Concepts et al. Narrowed

GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Reaches $2.15B Deal to Sell Business Division
GULFPORT ENERGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'D' on Missed Interest Payment
IMPRESA HOLDINGS: Dec. 7 Auction of Substantially All Assets
INCLUSIVE HEALTHCARE: Court Waives Appointment of Ombudsman
JOSHUAVILLE LLC: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors

KG IM LLC: Appointment of Mackinac as CRO Appropriate, Court Rules
LRGHEALTHCARE: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
LUCKY TEETH PEDIATRIC: Judge Excused the Appointment of PCO
MAINES PAPER: Pruitt Suit Shelved Pending Bankruptcy Proceedings
NEPHROS INC: Prices $5 Million Registered Direct Stock Offering

NEUMEDICINES INC: Dec. 10 Auction of All Assets Set
OCULAR THERAPEUTIX: Prices Public Offering of Common Stock
OUTDOOR BY DESIGN: Seeks Nov. 28 Plan Exclusivity Extension
PAI HOLDCO: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
PAPER STORE: Jan. 19-20 Hearings on Cure Amount Disputes

PARKER'S QUALITY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PAUL OLIVA PARADIS: Nov. 9 Hearing on $460K Nashville Property Sale
PELICAN REAL ESTATE: $11.3K Sale of Project Wells Interests Okayed
PIUS STREET ASSOCIATES: Court Directs Appointment of Ch 11 Trustee
PLATINUM GROUP: Closes Private Placement with Largest Shareholder

POSEIDON INVESTMENT: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR; Outlook Stable
PUT R UP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
ROBERT J. MOCKOVIAK: Fortunatos Buying Princeton Property for $1.7M
RONALD A. GOODWIN: Gibtta Buying Wichita Property for $747K
SEMBLANCE MEDSPA: Tomaino Named as Patient Care Ombudsman

SEVEN AND ROSE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
SLIM DOLLAR: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
SMARTOURS LLC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
STEIN MART: Sets Sale Procedures for Real Property Leases
SUGARHOUSE HSP: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR; Outlook Negative

TEXAS SOUTH: Delays Form 10-Q Filing Due to Working Capital Issues
TM HEALTHCARE: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
TOWN SPORTS: Ch.11 Bankruptcy Filing Stays Kolumiichuk Class Suit
TRIDENT BRANDS: Delays Filing of August 31 Quarterly Report
VAQUERIA ORTIZ: $247.8K Sale of 23K-L Milk Quota Approved

VERACODE PARENT: S&P Assigns 'B-' ICR on Proposed Debt Issuance
VRAI TABERNACLE: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
WILLIAM FOCAZIO: Ombudsman Filed Sixth Report
YOUNGEVITY INTERNATIONAL: Accepts Resignation of Accounting Firm

                            *********

1769 LLC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------
Debtor: 1769 LLC
        9322 3rd Ave
        Ste 502
        Brooklyn, NY 11209-6802

Business Description: 1769 LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate
                      debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
                      101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 19, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York

Case No.: 20-43646

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong

Debtor's Counsel: Kevin J. Nash, Esq.
                  GOLDBERG WEPRIN FINKEL GOLDSTEIN LLP
                  1501 Broadway 22nd Floor
                  New York, NY 10036
                  Tel: (212) 221-5700
                  Email: knash@gwfglaw.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Tim Ziss, member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/EDOLOVY/1769_LLC__nyebke-20-43646__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


AAG FH: S&P Affirms 'B-' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings on Toronto-based auto
retailer AAG FH L.P., including its 'B-' long-term issuer credit
rating on the company.

At the same time, S&P removed the ratings on AAG from CreditWatch,
where they had been placed with negative implications April 16,
2020, and assigned a negative outlook. The negative outlook
reflects the risk that the expected recovery in auto sales could
stall due to the pandemic, potentially leading to weaker interest
coverage ratios or liquidity.

The affirmation and removal from CreditWatch primarily reflect
AAG's better liquidity position than S&P had expected in April
2020.  AAG's sales, earnings, and cash flow generation in the first
half of the year have been trending better than S&P had previously
expected. Incorporating these results, S&P now expects revenue and
adjusted EBITDA to be down 20%-30% in 2020 and to recover near 2019
levels within the next two years. The company also generated
stronger-than-expected positive operating cash flow in first-half
2020, spurred in large part by an inflow of working capital. As a
result, AAG had ample cash at June 30, 2020, which S&P believes
better positions it to manage the decline in sales and operating
disruptions primarily attributed to the pandemic.

The negative outlook reflects the risk that the effects of the
pandemic could be more severe than S&P anticipates, leading to
weaker-than-expected credit measures for AAG. Such a scenario could
also negatively affect S&P's view of the company's liquidity
position, potentially leading the rating agency to characterize
AAG's capital structure as unsustainable.

"We could lower our ratings on the company within the next 12
months if operating results are weaker than we expect with a slower
recovery anticipated next year. In this scenario, we could expect
negative- to near-breakeven FOCF or adjusted EBITDA interest
coverage below 1.5x for an extended period, potentially leading us
to conclude that AAG's financial commitments are unsustainable in
the long term," S&P said.

"We could revise our outlook on AAG to stable within the next 12
months, and possibly as early as after our review of the company's
third-quarter results, if prospects for auto sales and
profitability improve. In this scenario, we would have more
conviction that credit measures should improve in line with or
better than our forecast, including positive annual FOCF-to-debt
approaching 5% and adjusted EBITDA interest coverage at or above
1.5x after 2020," the rating agency said.


ADOMANI INC: Discloses Substantial Doubt on Staying Going Concern
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ADOMANI, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing
a net loss of $1,105,000 on $130,000 of sales for the three months
ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $1,294,000 on
$4,388,000 of sales for the same period in 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $3,255,000, total
liabilities of $2,059,000, and $1,196,000 in total stockholders'
equity.

The Company disclosed that there is substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern, which will affect its
ability to obtain future financing and may require it to curtail
its operations.

The Company said, "Our consolidated financial statements as of June
30, 2020, were prepared under the assumption that we will continue
as a going concern.  At June 30, 2020, we had cash and cash
equivalents of US$883,949.  We do not believe that our existing
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments will be
sufficient to fund our operations during the next eighteen months
unless we are able to resolve the HVIP funding issues in the
near-term or we are able to mitigate the impact of certain
anti-dilution and other rights contained in our outstanding
warrants that have, to date, restricted our ability to raise
additional debt or equity capital on terms that are acceptable to
us.  Accordingly, our ability to continue as a going concern will
depend on our ability to mitigate the impact of such anti-dilution
rights and raise additional capital to finance our operations and
continue to support our growth initiatives, attain further
operating efficiencies, reduce or contain expenditures, and,
ultimately, to generate revenue.

"If we are unable to continue as a going concern, we may have to
liquidate our assets and may receive less than the value at which
those assets are carried on our audited consolidated financial
statements, and it is likely that investors will lose all or part
of their investment.  If we seek additional financing to fund our
business activities in the future and there remains substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, investors
or other financing sources may be unwilling to provide additional
funding to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all.  Based on
these factors, management determined that there is substantial
doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/TqrZPb

ADOMANI Inc. (OTCMKTS: ADOM) designs zero-emission electric and
hybrid drivetrain systems for integration in new school buses and
medium to heavy-duty commercial fleet vehicles. The company also
designs patented re-power conversion kits to replace conventional
drivetrain systems for combustion powered vehicles with
zero-emission electric or hybrid drivetrain systems


ADVAXIS INC: Agrees to Issue 3M Shares in Exchange for Warrants
---------------------------------------------------------------
Advaxis, Inc. entered into private exchange agreements with Anson
Investments Master Fund LP and CVI Investments, Inc. of warrants
issued in connection with the Company's January 2020 public
offering of common stock and concurrent private placement of
warrants.  The Warrants being exchanged provide for the purchase of
up to an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the Company's common
stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share.  The warrants became
exercisable on July 21, 2020 and have an expiration date of July
21, 2025. Pursuant to such exchange agreements, the Company agreed
to issue 3,000,000 shares of common stock to the Investors in
exchange for such Warrants on a 1:0.6 basis.

In connection with the exchanges, each of the Investors has agreed
that, for 15 days following the exchange, they will limit their
daily trading in its common stock to no more than 10% of the
cumulative trading volume of the common stock for such date (which
cumulative trading volume shall include pre-market, market and
post-market trading volume for such date) as reported by Bloomberg,
LP.

The exchanges were consummated to ensure that the Company is
well-positioned to take advantage of any strategic, collaboration,
financing or other potential transactions in the near future.
Except as otherwise disclosed above, no additional shares of common
stock have been issued in connection with the exchanges on a fully
diluted basis.

                        About Advaxis Inc.

Advaxis, Inc. -- http://www.advaxis.com/-- is a clinical-stage
biotechnology company focused on the development and
commercialization of proprietary Lm-based antigen delivery
products.  These immunotherapies are based on a platform technology
that utilizes live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes (Lm)
bioengineered to secrete antigen/adjuvant fusion proteins.
TheseLm-based strains are believed to be a significant advancement
in immunotherapy as they integrate multiple functions into a single
immunotherapy and are designed to access and direct antigen
presenting cells to stimulate anti-tumor T cell immunity, activate
the immune system with the equivalent of multiple adjuvants, and
simultaneously reduce tumor protection in the tumor
microenvironment to enable T cells to eliminate tumors.

Advaxis reported a net loss of $16.61 million for the year ended
Oct. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $66.51 million for the
year ended Oct. 31, 2018.  As of July 31, 2020, the Company had
$40.02 million in total assets, $8.55 million in total liabilities,
and $31.47 million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2012, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated Dec. 20, 2019,
citing that the Company has incurred significant losses and needs
to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


AEROCENTURY CORP: Has $13.5-Mil. Net Loss for the June 30 Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AeroCentury Corp. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $13,517,700 on $4,391,600 of total
revenues and other income for the three months ended June 30, 2020,
compared to a net loss of $77,600 on $7,161,700 of total revenues
and other income for the same period in 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $123,191,500,
total liabilities of $122,857,700, and $333,800 in total
stockholders' equity.

AeroCentury said, "The Company was in default under its MUFG Credit
Facility as of December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020.

"On May 1, 2020, the Company and the MUFG Credit Facility Lenders
("MUFG Lenders") executed an amendment to the MUFG Credit Facility
(as amended, the "MUFG Loan Agreement") to convert the MUFG Credit
Facility into a term loan facility (as converted, the "MUFG Loan").
The amendment includes certain requirements and establishment of
deadlines for achievement of milestones toward execution of Company
strategic alternatives for the Company and/or its assets acceptable
to the MUFG Lenders.  The amendment cured the December and March
defaults, but the Company is currently in default under the MUFG
Loan Agreement due to non-payment of interest due on July 1, 2020
and August 3, 2020.

"The MUFG Lenders have the right to exercise any and all remedies
for default under the MUFG Loan Agreement.  Such remedies include,
but are not limited to, declaring the entire indebtedness
immediately due and payable and, if the Company were unable to
repay such accelerated indebtedness, foreclosing upon the assets of
the Company that secure the indebtedness under the MUFG Loan (the
"MUFG Indebtedness"), which consist of all of the Company's assets
except for certain assets held in the Company's single asset
special-purpose financing subsidiaries.  The Company is obligated
to pay US$3.1 million related to the termination of the MUFG Swaps
in March 2020.  The Company also defaulted on payment under the
Nord Loans.

"The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant cash flow issues for
airlines, and some airlines, including some of the Company's
customers, have been unable to timely meet their obligations under
their lease obligations with the Company unless government
financial support is received, of which there can be no assurance.
Any additional significant nonpayment or late payment of lease
payments by a significant lessee or combination of lessees could in
turn impose limits on the Company's ability to fund its ongoing
operations as well as cause the Company to be unable to meet its
debt obligations, which in turn could lead to an immediate
acceleration of debt and foreclosure upon the Company's assets.

"As a result of these factors, there is substantial doubt regarding
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The
condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared on a going concern
basis and do not include any adjustments that might arise as a
result of uncertainties about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/I8nJPt

AeroCentury Corp. is engaged in the business of investing in used
regional aircraft equipment and leasing the equipment to foreign
and domestic regional air carriers.  The Company's principal
business objective is to acquire aircraft assets and manage those
assets in order to provide a return on investment through lease
revenue and, eventually, sale proceeds.  The Company is
headquartered in Burlingame, California.


AKORN INC: Financial Status, Chapter 11 Cast Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Akorn, Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a
net loss of $68,662,000 on $120,310,000 of net revenues for the
three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of
$111,599,000 on $178,057,000 of net revenues for the same period in
2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $1,001,764,000,
total liabilities of $1,080,463,000, and $78,699,000 in total
shareholders' deficit.

Akorn said, "The Company's financial condition and the Chapter 11
Cases raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
going concern within one year after the date of the issuance of
these financial statements.  The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements were prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern and contemplate the
continuation of our operations, realization of assets and
satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of
business.  As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, the realization of
the debtors-in-possession's assets and the satisfaction of
liabilities are subject to significant uncertainty.  While
operating as debtors-in-possession pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code,
we may sell or otherwise dispose of or liquidate assets, or settle
liabilities, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court or as
otherwise permitted in the ordinary course of business for amounts
other than those reflected in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.  Further, a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization
is likely to materially change from the amounts and classifications
of assets and liabilities reported in our condensed consolidated
balance sheets as of June 30, 2020.  As the progress of these plans
and transactions is subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court and
therefore not within our control, successful reorganization and
emergence from bankruptcy is not considered probable.  The
Company's condensed consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments related to the recoverability and
classification of liabilities that may be necessary should the
Company be unable to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/kppGJN

Akorn, Inc., a specialty generic pharmaceutical company, develops,
manufactures, and markets generic and branded prescription
pharmaceuticals, over-the-counter (OTC) consumer health products,
and animal health pharmaceuticals in the United States and
internationally. The company operates in two segments, Prescription
Pharmaceuticals and Consumer Health.  Akorn, Inc., was founded in
1971 and is headquartered in Lake Forest, Illinois.


ALLIED ESPORTS: Incurs $10.9MM Net Loss for Quarter Ended June 30
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Allied Esports Entertainment Inc. filed its quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $10,880,729 on $4,582,287 of
total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared
to a net loss of $2,811,286 on $7,338,346 of total revenues for the
same period in 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $69,907,625,
total liabilities of $25,929,894, and $43,977,731 in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company said, "As of June 30, 2020, we had cash and a working
capital deficit of approximately $9.2 million (excluding
approximately $5.0 million of restricted cash) and $1.5 million,
respectively.  Current liabilities include $9.6 million gross
principal amount of convertible notes which mature on June 8, 2022,
but for which repayments in equal monthly installments begin on
August 7, 2020 and for which certain payments can be accelerated at
the option of the lender.  For the six months ended June 30, 2020
and 2019, we incurred net losses of approximately $19.7 million and
$6.7 million, respectively, and used cash in operations of
approximately $3.1 million and $5.0 million, respectively.  The
aforementioned factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern within one year after the issuance date
of our condensed consolidated financial statements.

"The Company's continuation is dependent upon attaining and
maintaining profitable operations and the ability to generate
positive cash flow from the various revenue sources it is pursuing.
Until that time, we will need to raise additional capital to fund
the operation at adequate levels to achieve our objectives.  There
can be no assurance that we will be able to close on sufficient
financing to meet our needs.  Prior to the Merger, in addition to
our revenues, our operations relied heavily on investment from
Ourgame by means of operational support and through the issuance of
debt.  

"We continue to pursue sources of additional capital through
various financing transactions or arrangements, including joint
venturing of projects, debt financing or other means, including
equity financing in the capital markets now available to us.
However, pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement in
connection with the Senior Note, the Company agreed it would not
take on additional debt from third parties without the Investors'
written approval, subject to certain exceptions for ordinary course
trade debt.  The Company also agreed to use 35% of the proceeds
from future financings in excess of $3 million (or $5 million if
approved by the Investors) to pay down the outstanding balance on
the Loan.  The Company reserves its rights under the Purchase
Agreement to consummate, subject to certain exceptions, a debtor or
equity offering of up to $5 million in the future.

"In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak
of a novel coronavirus (COVID-19) as a pandemic which continues to
spread throughout the United States.  As a global entertainment
company that hosts numerous live events with spectators and
participants in destination cities, such outbreak has caused people
to avoid traveling to and attending our events.  Allied Esports and
WPT businesses have cancelled or postponed live events, and until
Allied Esports' flagship gaming arena located at the Luxor Hotel in
Las Vegas, Nevada reopened on June 25, 2020 these businesses were
operating online only.  The arena is currently running under a
modified schedule for daily play and weekly tournaments, and the
WPT business continues to operate online only.  Production of new
content has been temporarily halted.  We are continuing to monitor
the outbreak of COVID-19 and the related business and travel
restrictions and changes to behavior intended to reduce its spread,
and the related impact on our operations, financial position and
cash flows, as well as the impact on our employees.  Due to the
rapid development and fluidity of this situation, the magnitude and
duration of the pandemic and its impact on our operations and
liquidity is uncertain as of the date of this report.  While there
could ultimately be a material impact on our operations and
liquidity, at the time of issuance, the impact cannot be
determined."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/37tc62

Allied Esports Entertainment Inc., an esports entertainment
company, provides infrastructure, transformative live experiences,
and multiplatform content and interactive services worldwide.  The
company was incorporated in 2017 and is headquartered in Irvine,
California.  Allied Esports Entertainment Inc. is a subsidiary of
Ourgame International Holdings Limited.


ALPHA INVESTMENT: Incurs $219K Net Loss for Quarter Ended June 30
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Alpha Investment Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $218,777 on $9,348 of total income for the
three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of
$502,670 on $39,799 of total income for the same period in 2019.
At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $34,898,886,
total liabilities of $293,120, and $34,230,888 in total
stockholders' equity.

Alpha Investment said, "Future issuances of the Company's equity or
debt securities will be required in order for the Company to
continue to finance its operations and continue as a going concern.
The Company's present revenues are insufficient to meet operating
expenses.  The financial statements of the Company have been
prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of
assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of
business.  The Company has an accumulated deficit of $4,515,730 as
of June 30, 2020 and requires capital for its contemplated
operational and marketing activities to take place.  The Company's
ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of
common stock is unknown.  Securing additional financing, the
successful development of the Company's contemplated plan of
operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of
profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue
operations.  The ability to successfully resolve these factors
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.  The financial statements of the Company do not
include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these
aforementioned uncertainties."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/drpLyj

Alpha Investment Inc. focuses on real estate and other commercial
lending activities.  The company was formerly known as GoGo Baby,
Inc., and changed its name to Alpha Investment Inc. in April 2017
to reflect its new business plan.  Alpha Investment Inc. was
incorporated in 2013 and is based in Columbus, Ohio.  As of March
17, 2017, Alpha Investment Inc. operates as a subsidiary of Omega
Commercial Finance Corp.


ALPHATEC HOLDINGS: Grosses $115 Million from Common Stock Offering
------------------------------------------------------------------
Alphatec Holdings, Inc. reports the closing of its previously
announced underwritten public offering of 13,142,855 shares of its
common stock, which includes the full exercise of the underwriters'
option to purchase 1,714,285 additional shares of common stock, at
a public offering price of $8.75 per share, for total gross
proceeds of approximately $115.0 million, before deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by ATEC.

Morgan Stanley and Cowen acted as joint book-running managers in
the offering.  Canaccord Genuity acted as lead manager in the
offering, with Lake Street Capital Markets and Northland Capital
Markets acting as co-managers.

The shares of common stock were offered pursuant to a shelf
registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-241677) previously
filed with and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.  The offering was made by means of a prospectus
supplement and the accompanying prospectus.  A preliminary
prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus relating to the
offering were filed previously with the SEC and are available on
the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.  The final prospectus supplement
and accompanying base prospectus will be filed with the SEC and
available on the SEC's website thereafter, and, when available, may
also be obtained from Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attention:
Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, New
York 10014, or by e-mail at prospectus@morganstanley.com or Cowen
and Company, LLC, at c/o Broadridge Financial Solutions, Attn:
Prospectus Department, 1155 Long Island Avenue, Edgewood, NY 11717,
by telephone at (833) 297-2926 or by email at
PostSaleManualRequests@broadridge.com.

                      About Alphatec Holdings

Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) (www.atecspine.com), through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Alphatec Spine, Inc. and SafeOp
Surgical, Inc., is a medical device company dedicated to
revolutionizing the approach to spine surgery through clinical
distinction.  ATEC architects and commercializes approach-based
technology that integrates seamlessly with the SafeOp Neural
InformatiX System to provide real-time, objective nerve information
that can enhance the safety and reproducibility of spine surgery.

Alphatec reported a net loss of $57 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $28.97 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $161.13
million in total assets, $42.79 million in total current
liabilities, $66.07 million in long-term debt, $191,000 in
operating lease liability, $9.65 million in other long-term
liabilities, $23.60 million in redeemable preferred stock, and
$18.82 million in total stockholders' equity.


AMC ENTERTAINMENT: Reports $561.2M Net Loss for June 30 Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $561 million on $19 million of total
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to a
net earnings of $49 million on $1,506 million of total revenues for
the same period in 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $11,272 million,
total liabilities of $12,847 million, and $1,575 million in total
stockholders' deficit.

AMC Entertainment said, "In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the
Company has taken and is continuing to take significant steps to
preserve cash by eliminating non-essential costs, including
reductions to executive compensation and elements of its fixed cost
structure.

"The Company intends to seek any available potential benefits under
the CARES Act, including loans, investments or guarantees, and any
other such current or future government programs for which the
Company qualifies domestically and internationally.  The Company
cannot predict the manner in which such benefits will be allocated
or administered, and the Company cannot assure the reader that it
will be able to access such benefits in a timely manner or at all.

"The Company believes its cash balance as of June 30, 2020, cash
generated from operating activities, the proceeds from the issuance
on July 31, 2020 of $300.0 million, prior to deducting discounts
and cash premiums based on contract assumptions and estimates of
$36 million, of new 10.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2026 (the "First
Lien Notes due 2026") and the closing of the exchange offer on July
31, 2020 (the "Exchange Offers") (which allowed the Company to
extend maturities on approximately $1.7 billion of debt to 2026,
most of which was maturing in 2024 and 2025 previously, with
interest due for the coming 12 to 18 months on the exchanged senior
subordinated notes expected to be paid all or in part on an in-kind
basis pursuant to the terms of the 10%/12% Cash/PIK Toggle Second
Lien Subordinated Secured Notes due 2026 (the "Second Lien Notes
due 2026"), thereby generating a further near-term cash savings for
the Company of between approximately $120 million to $180 million)
may provide sufficient liquidity to fund operations and essential
capital expenditures for the next 12 months.  Further, the
Company's lenders have granted relief from the maintenance
covenants in the revolving credit agreements and the Company
believes it will maintain compliance with all financial debt
covenants for the next 12 months.  Therefore, the Company believes
it has the cash resources to reopen its theatres and resume
operations this summer or later.  The Company's liquidity needs
thereafter will depend, among other things, on the timing of a full
resumption of operations, the timing of movie releases and its
ability to generate revenues.

"While the Company has used its best estimates based on currently
available information, the Company cannot assure the reader that
its assumptions used to estimate its liquidity requirements will be
correct—including but not limited to attendance, food and
beverage revenues, rent relief, cost savings, and capital
expenditures—because the Company has never previously experienced
a complete cessation of its operations, and as a consequence, its
ability to be predictive is uncertain.  If the Company does not
recommence operations within its estimated timeline, the Company
will require additional capital and may also require additional
financing if, for example, its operations do not generate the
expected revenues or a recurrence of COVID-19 were to cause another
suspension of operations.  Such additional financing may not be
available on favorable terms or at all.  Due to these factors,
substantial doubt exists about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern for a reasonable period of time."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/V426wC

AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, is in
the theatrical exhibition business in the U.S. The Leawood,
Kansas-based Company currently operates over 1,006 theatres with
approximately 11,046 screens globally.


AMERGENT HOSPITALITY: Discloses Substantial Going Concern Doubt
---------------------------------------------------------------
Amergent Hospitality Group, Inc., filed its quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $9,121,195 on $3,918,470 of
total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to
a net loss of $3,216,799 on $8,350,940 of total revenue for the
same period in 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $34,445,662,
total liabilities of $39,577,015, and $5,590,961 in total
stockholders' deficit.

The Company disclosed that its current operating losses, combined
with its working capital deficit and uncertainties regarding the
impact of COVID-19, raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/7ZDfy1

Amergent Hospitality Group, Inc. (OTCMKTS: AMHG) owns, operates and
franchises fast casual and full service restaurant brands.


AMERI HOLDINGS: Has Substantial Doubt on Staying as Going Concern
-----------------------------------------------------------------
AMERI Holdings, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a total comprehensive loss of $1,665,899 on $8,254,941
of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to a
total comprehensive loss of $1,380,943 on $11,015,057 of revenue
for the same period in 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $27,506,424,
total liabilities of $14,626,784, and $12,879,640 in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company said, "Our financial statements as of June 30, 2020
have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a
going concern.  Our ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent upon our ability to raise additional funding through the
issuance of equity or debt securities, as well as to attain further
operating efficiencies and, ultimately, to generate additional
revenues.  Our financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  Although
the Company believes in the viability of management's strategy to
generate sufficient revenue, control costs and the ability to raise
additional funds if necessary, there can be no assurances to that
effect.  The foregoing conditions raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/2VW6jm

AMERI Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides SAP cloud
and digital enterprise services.  The Company was founded in 2013
and is headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey.


ANCHORAGE MIDTOWN: 10 Days' Notice for Hearing on Any Proposed Sale
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gary Spraker of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Alaska has entered an order that the hearing on any proposed sale
by Anchorage Midtown Motel, Inc. may be set on 10 days' notice via
the submission of a calendar request to the Court.

The Debtor will serve notice of the hearing on the sale motion on
the creditor matrix via U.S. Mail, and via electronic mail on all
active participants in the case, including First National Bank of
Alaska, The Carpet Man, and the United States Trustee.

Opposition to the sale motion must be filed with the Court and
served on the Debtor and its counsel no later than two days prior
to the scheduled hearing on the sale motion.

                  About Anchorage Midtown Motel

Anchorage Midtown Motel, Inc., is a single asset real estate as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).  It owns the Anchorage
Midtown Motel, a centrally located motel/boarding house consisting
of four buildings with more than 62 rooms.

Anchorage Midtown Motel, based in Anchorage, Arkansas, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Alaska Case No. 17-00148) on April
25, 2017, listing $1 million to $10 million in assets and less than
$1 million in liabilities.  A Chapter 11 plan was confirmed on Dec.
5, 2017.

The 2017 petition was signed by Kelly M. Millen, the Debtor's
vice-president and secretary.  Judge Gary Spraker presided over the
2017 case.  Michael R. Mills, Esq., at Dorsey & Whitney LLP, served
as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel in that case.

Anchorage Midtown Motel again filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
(Bankr. Alaska Case No. 19-00369) on Nov. 21, 2019, listing under
$10 million in assets and $500,001 to $1 million in liabilities.
Dorsey & Whitney LLP also serves as bankruptcy counsel in the
present case.


ANGEL LARA: Long Beach Property Valued at $545,000
--------------------------------------------------
In the bankruptcy case captioned In re: ANGEL RODRIGUEZ LARA and
ANGELICA SOTO CALVA, Chapter 11, Debtor(s), Case No.
2:19-bk-14078-NB (Bankr. C.D. Cal.), the Debtors filed a motion to
value collateral securing the claim held by Mission Hen, LLC as
Junior Lienholder for purposes of confirming any proposed chapter
11 plan. The Debtors' current Plan does not include any alleged
secured claim of the Junior Lienholder. The Debtors were relying on
a prior bankruptcy court order granting an earlier valuation motion
and valuing the subject property at $425,000, which would have left
the Junior Lienholder's claim entirely underwater; but at the
Hearing, the Court ruled that such valuation was not binding on the
Junior Lienholder due to lack of proper notice. The collateral
consists of the rental property located at 1934-1935 Locust Avenue,
Long Beach, California 90806.

The Motion asserted that the dollar amount owed on the senior lien
against the Property was $508,569.28 as of the Petition Date, based
on the senior lienholder's proof of claim. The Junior Lienholder
has not contested this dollar amount.

Upon analysis, Bankruptcy Judge Neil W. Bason held that the Junior
Lienholder had a secured claim of $36,430.72 as of the Petition
Date (i.e., Property value of $545,000 -- senior lien balance of
$508,569.28 = $36,430.72) and any proposed chapter 11 plan must pay
the present value of that claim (subject to any reduction or
increase in that claim during the course of this bankruptcy case
due to, e.g., any adequate protection payments in excess of
interest charges). The remainder of the Junior Lienholder's claim
can be treated as a general unsecured claim. Accordingly, the
Motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Judge Bason stated that in general, claims must be determined "as
of the date of the filing of the petition." In analogous contexts,
this Bankruptcy Court has held that the Petition Date is the
relevant date for valuation. True, holders of secured claims are
entitled to "adequate protection" against a decline in the value of
their collateral, but any appreciation in value of the collateral
generally belongs to the bankruptcy estate, subject to certain
rights of the holders of secured claims to participate in that
appreciation in certain circumstances. It is also true that any
proposed chapter 11 plan that pays secured claims over time must
provide the present value of whatever interest the holder retains
in the collateral (up to the dollar amount of such claim) (11
U.S.C. Sec. 1129(b)(2)(A)(i)(II)), but that simply assures that the
stream of future payments is not worth less than the (bifurcated)
secured claim -- it does not increase the secured claim (or
decrease it) to whatever value the collateral might have as of the
effective date of the plan. In addition, the parties have not
contested that the proper date for valuation is the Petition Date,
so any contrary arguments are waived and forfeited.

The Debtors' appraisal valued the Property at $425,000 as of Sept.
20, 2019. The Junior Lienholder's appraisal valued the Property at
$555,000 as of April 19, 2019, Both appraisals relied on
comparisons with properties that they assert are comparable
("Comps"), and adjust the prices of those Comps to arrive at a
value for the Property, and both appraisals rely most strongly on
the sales approach, supported by the income approach and (to a
lesser extent) the cost approach.

Judge Bason stated that usually the Comps that are closest to the
Property are the best indicators of value; and it is also important
to consider the characteristics of the precise location, such as
whether the Property is adjacent to undesirable properties or
features, or within a particular school district. The Debtors'
Appraisal lists 3 Comps over 1 mile from the Property and one 4.57
miles, whereas the Junior Lienholder's appraisal lists all but one
Comp within a mile. This consideration weighs in favor of the
Junior Lienholder's appraisal.

Sale dates close to the valuation date generally are preferable (in
a market that may be rising or falling). The Debtors' appraisal
uses dates within three to five months of the Petition Date,
whereas the Junior Lienholder's appraisal uses dates from within
one month to over a year before the Petition Date. The parties have
not provided evidence of whatever changes may have occurred in the
market during that time period, in the geographic area of the
Property. Although the Court takes judicial notice that prices in
the greater Los Angeles area generally have been stable or rising,
and therefore conceivably an upward adjustment to the Junior
Lienholder's appraisal might be warranted based on old sales,
nevertheless any such issues should have been analyzed in the first
instance by the appraisers, and in the absence of such analysis the
Court weighs the Junior Lienholder's sale Comps ## 3 and 4 slightly
less heavily due to their age. Those sales are not outliers,
however, so this adjustment makes little difference. On balance,
this consideration weighs very slightly in favor of the Debtors'
appraisal.

Appraisals traditionally adjust Comps for bed and bath counts,
other characteristics of each property, square footage, or some
combination of those things, and various methods of adjustment are
acceptable. Based on the Court's review of both the nature and the
size of adjustments made by the appraisers, this consideration does
not warrant any adjustment.

Taking into consideration all of the record presented, Judge Bason
found that as of the relevant date the Property had a value of
$545,000.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision is available at
https://bit.ly/3keyWet from Leagle.com.

Angel Rodriguez Lara and Angelica Soto Calva filed for chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-14078) on April
10, 2019.


APPLIED ENERGETICS: Reports $1.4-Mil. Net Loss for June 30 Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------------
Applied Energetics, Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $1,374,710 on $0 of revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2020, compared to a net loss of $786,820 on
$0 of revenue for the same period in 2019.

At June 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $2,886,017, total
liabilities of $5,937,720, and $3,051,703 in total stockholders'
deficit.

For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the company incurred a net
loss of approximately $2,640,000, had negative cash flows from
operations of $1,260,000 and may incur additional future losses due
to the reduction in government contract activity.  Additionally, as
of June 30, 2020, the company had a working capital deficit of
$4,196,000.  These matters raise substantial doubt as to the
company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The ongoing
COVID-19 pandemic contributes to this uncertainty.


A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/EOlYoj

Applied Energetics, Inc., engages in the development, manufacture,
and sale of high-performance lasers, high voltage electronics,
advanced optical systems, and integrated guided energy systems for
defense, aerospace, industrial, and scientific customers worldwide.
The company was founded in 1990 and is based in Tucson, Arizona.


ARANDELL HOLDINGS: Nov. 18 Auction of Substantially All Assets
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge John T. Dorsey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware authorized the bidding procedures proposed by Arandell
Holdings, Inc. and affiliates in connection with the sale of
substantially all assets of Arandell Corp. and Arandell Holdings to
Arandell Acquisition Co. ("AAC"), subject to overbid.

In exchange, AAC offers approximately $31,325,000 (subject to
potential adjustments up or done), consisting of (i) an aggregate
cash amount equal to the sum of (A) the DIP Loan Payment Amount
(including the Administrative Claims Cash Amount) estimated to be
$20,500,000, plus (ii) a credit bid (A) by Farragut in the amount
of $2.4 million, and (iii) AAC's assumption of the Assumed
Liabilities.

The Debtors are authorized to deem the Stalking Horse Bidder a
Qualified Bidder for all purposes, and to deem the Stalking Horse
Bid as set forth in the Stalking Horse APA a Qualified Bid.
Subject to final Court approval at the Sale Hearing, the Debtors
are authorized to enter into the Stalking Horse APA with the
Stalking Horse Bidder.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Nov. 13, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (ET).  The Debtors
will notify Potential Bidders of their status as Qualified Bidders
no later than 5:00 p.m. (ET) on Nov. 16, 2020.

     b. Initial Bid: At least equal to the value of the Stalking
Horse Bid, plus the amount of the Stalking Horse Protections, plus
$100,000

     c. Deposit: 5% of the aggregate cash portion of the Purchase
Price of the bid

     d. Auction: In the event the Debtors receive, on or before the
Bid Deadline, one or more Qualified Bids in addition to the
Stalking Horse Bid, an Auction will be conducted at 10:00 a.m. (ET)
on Nov. 18, 2020, or such other date, time or location,  by
videoconference (or such other form of remote communication
established by the Debtors in consultation with the Consultation
Parties) as the Debtors will notify all Qualified Bidders
(including the Stalking Horse Bidder if it will have become a
Qualified Bidder).  If no Qualified Bids with respect to the
Purchased Assets other than the Stalking Horse Bid (provided it has
become a Qualified Bid) are received on or before the Bid Deadline,
the Debtors will not conduct the Auction with respect to the
Purchased Assets, and instead will ask approval of the sale of the
Purchased Assets pursuant to the Stalking Horse APA at the Sale
Hearing.

     e. Bid Increments: To be announced at the Auction

     f. Sale Hearing: Nov. 24, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. (ET)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Nov. 17, 2020, at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     h. Closing: Dec. 4, 2020

     i. Any Qualified Bidder who has a valid, undisputed and
perfected lien on any Purchased Assets will have the right to
credit bid all or a portion of such Secured Creditor's allowed
secured claims.

The form of Sale Notice is approved.  Within two Business Days
after entry of the Order, or as soon as reasonably practicable
thereafter, the Debtors will serve the Sale Notice upon the Sale
Notice Parties.

Promptly after the conclusion of the Auction, if any, and the
selection of the Successful Bid(s) and Back-Up Bid(s), but in any
event no later than Nov. 19, 2020, the Debtors will email or fax to
the Sale Notice Parties, and file and post on the Case Information
Website a notice identifying such Successful Bid(s) and Back-Up
Bid(s) with the Court.

The Debtors are authorized and directed, subject to the
satisfaction of the Stalking Horse Protections' Conditions, to pay
the Break-Up Fee and Expense Reimbursement Amount to the Stalking
Horse Bidder in accordance with the terms of the Stalking Horse APA
without further order of the Court.

The Assumption and Assignment Procedures are approved.  At least 14
calendar days prior to the deadline to file a Sale Objection, the
Debtors will file with the Court, and cause to be published on the
Case Information Website, the Potential Assumption and Assignment
Notice and Contracts Schedule.  Within such time period, the
Potential Assumption and Assignment Notice and Contracts Schedules
will also be served on each Counterparty listed on the Contracts
Schedule.  The Cure Objection Deadline is Nov. 17, 2020, at 5:00
p.m. (ET).

Qualified Bidders other than the Stalking Horse Bidder will provide
adequate assurance information with their bids by Nov. 13, 2020.
The Adequate Assurance Objection is 5:00 p.m. (ET) on Nov. 23,
2020.

If following the Auction, the Stalking Horse Bidder is not selected
by the Debtors as the Successful Bidder, then the Debtors will no
later than Nov. 19, 2020 serve the Notice of Auction Results on
each Counterparty that received a Potential Assumption and
Assignment
Notice and any Supplemental Assumption and Assignment Notice at the
same time as such Notice of Auction Results is filed with the Court
and published on the Case Management Website.

All time periods set forth in the Order will be calculated in
accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a).

All of the "Aggregate Debt" and all of the "Postpetition Factor
Debt" will be "Paid in Full" upon, and in connection with, the
consummation of the Sale Transaction.

Notwithstanding any Bankruptcy Rule (including, but not limited to,
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), 6006(d), 7062 or 9014) or Local Rule that
might otherwise delay the effectiveness of the Order, the terms and
conditions of the Order will be immediately effective and
enforceable upon its entry.  For the avoidance of doubt, the 14-day
stay of orders authorizing the use, sale, or lease of property, as
set forth in Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) and the 14-day stay of an
order authorizing the assignment of an executory contract or
unexpired lease under Section 365(f) as set forth in Bankruptcy
Rule 6006(d) are waived.   

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yxjvhyr9 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                     About Arandell Holdings

Arandell -- https://www.arandell.com/ -- is a commercial printing
company that is located in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.  The
Company's largest customers are blue chip major retailers and
recognized brands using direct mail catalogs to promote both
in-store and e-commerce sales.  Arandell's products and services
include the production and delivery of higher-end catalogs and
other promotional products along with related data analytics
services supporting the needs of marketers.

Arandell Holdings, Inc., based in Menomonee Falls, WI, and its
debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-11941) on Aug. 13, 2020.  The Hon. John T. Dorsey
presides over the case.  

In the petition signed by Bradley J. Hoffman, president and CEO,
Arandell was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in assets
and $100 million to $500 million in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped STEINHILBER SWANSON LLP, and YOUNG CONAWAY
STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP, as counsel.  VON BRIESEN & ROPER S.C., is
special corporate counsel.  HARNEY PARTNERS, is the financial
advisor.  PROMONTORY POINT CAPITAL, is the investment banker.  BMC
GROUP, INC., is the claims and noticing agent.


ARDENT CYBER: Wants Plan Exclusivity Extended Until 2021
--------------------------------------------------------
Ardent Cyber Solutions, LLC, requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona to extend the exclusive period during which
the Debtor may file a Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement
either of the following:

     A. 30 days after the expiration of the effect of the August
17, 2020 Order; or

     B. December 2, 2021, which is 18 months after the date of the
Petition (11 U.S.C. Sec. 1121(d)(2)).

The Debtor seeks an extension of the exclusivity period as it
cannot prepare a Disclosure Statement that will provide adequate
information to the creditors such that will allow the creditors to
make an informed decision as to the feasibility and operations of
the Debtor. In fact, any Disclosure Statement prepared at this
juncture will result in an Objection filed by both the City of Los
Angeles and CyberGym Control Ltd.

On August 17, 2020, the Court entered an Order Granting In Part and
Denying In Part Government's Motion for Stay of Proceedings, where
the Order specifically stays "all discovery -- whether testimonial,
documentary or otherwise" as it relates to various matters. Among
other things, the matters to include issues relating to any
contracts between the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
("LADWP") and the Debtor as well as litigation between CyberGym
Control, the Debtor, and the Debtor's principal, Paul Paradis.  

The Debtor's main assets are two receivables asserted against the
City of Los Angeles relating to contracts between the Debtor and
LADWP. As a result of the August 17, 2020 Order, the Debtor, at
this time, cannot prosecute its claims against the City of Los
Angeles and therefore, cannot elaborate on the viability of such
prosecution as would be required in a Disclosure Statement and
Chapter 11 Plan.

The Debtor is well aware of the Court's concerns over seeking an
exclusivity extension. However, based upon the unique issues
relating to the Chapter 11 proceeding, it is believed that such a
request is not only appropriate but is necessary to protect the
integrity of the August 17, 2020 Order.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3jL31SA at no extra charge.

                  About Ardent Cyber Solutions

Ardent Cyber Solutions, LLC, a cybersecurity firm based in
Scottsdale, Ariz., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 20-06722) on June 3,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $1 million and $10
million.  

Judge Paul Sala oversees the case.  Allan D. NewDelman, P.C., is
the Debtor's legal counsel.


AYRO INC: Extends Investors' Deadline to Purchase Additional Shares
-------------------------------------------------------------------
AYRO, Inc. previously entered into a securities purchase agreement,
dated as of July 21, 2020, with certain institutional and
accredited investors.  Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company
agreed to issue and sell in a registered direct offering an
aggregate of 1,850,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par
value $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $5.00 per share,
for gross proceeds of approximately $9.25 million before the
deduction of fees and offering expenses.  The Shares were offered
by the Company pursuant to a shelf registration statement on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-227858), previously filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on
Oct. 16, 2018, and declared effective by the SEC on Nov. 9, 2018.
Pursuant to the Agreement, each purchaser also had the right to
purchase, on or before Oct. 19, 2020, additional shares of Common
Stock equal to the full amount of 75% of the Common Stock it
purchased at the initial closing, or an aggregate of 1,387,500
shares, at a price of $5.00 per share.

On Oct. 16, 2020, the Company entered into an addendum to the
Agreement, which extends the deadline for each purchaser to
exercise the right to purchase the Additional Shares by one year,
to Oct. 19, 2021.

                            About AYRO

Texas-based AYRO, Inc., f/k/a DropCar, Inc. -- http://www.ayro.com/
-- designs and delivers compact, emissions-free electric fleet
solutions for use within urban and short-haul markets. Capable of
accommodating a broad range of commercial requirements, AYRO's
vehicles are the emerging leaders of safe, affordable, efficient
and sustainable logistical transportation. AYRO was founded in 2017
by entrepreneurs, investors, and executives with a passion to
create sustainable urban electric vehicle solutions for Campus
Management, Last Mile & Urban Delivery and Closed Campus
Transport.

Dropcar reported a net loss of $4.90 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $18.75 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company had
$11.51 million in total assets, $2.96 million in total liabilities,
and $8.54 million in total stockholders' equity.

Friedman LLP, in East Hanover, New Jersey, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated March 30, 2020, citing that the Company has recurring losses
and negative cash flows from operations.  These conditions, among
others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


BARD COLLEGE: S&P Rates 2020A Bonds 'BB+'; Outlook Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings has assigned its 'BB+' long-term rating to
Dutchess County Local Development Corporation's, N.Y.'s tax-exempt
series 2020A and taxable series 2020B revenue debt, issued for Bard
College (Bard). The outlook is negative.

"The rating is based on Bard's consistent full-accrual operating
deficits, which rely heavily on donor support, and weak cash and
investment ratios, particularly to pro forma debt," said S&P Global
Ratings analyst Sean Wiley. The rating is also based on Bard's
solid demand profile as the college remains fairly selective,
though matriculation rates are weaker, and the college had a 10%
decline in full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment in fall 2020 due
in large part to COVID-19. Prior to fall 2020, enrollment was
fairly stable.

S&P assessed Bard's enterprise profile as strong, characterized by
fairly stable enrollment prior to COVID-19, above-average
selectivity, and solid retention and graduation rates to go along
with strong student quality and significant geographic diversity.
These are offset by weaker matriculation and a 10% enrollment
decline in fall 2020 mostly due to COVID-19. S&P assessed the
college's financial profile as vulnerable with significant
full-accrual operating deficits over the past four years and very
low cash and investments compared with both adjusted operating
expenses and pro forma debt.

"The negative outlook reflects our opinion of the ongoing risks
associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, which could further pressure
the college's enrollment and financial performance," added Mr.
Wiley.


BROOKSIDE PERSONAL CARE: Court Says No Need to Appoint PCO
----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Robert N. Opel II finds there's no need for the
appointment of a patient care ombudsman for the protection of the
patients of The Brookside Personal Care Home, Inc.

A copy of the Court's Order dated October 14, 2020 is available at
PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/y3hbksk5 at no extra
charge.

               About The Brookside Personal Care Home

The Brookside Personal Care Home, Inc. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No.
20-02740) on September 17, 2020. In the petition signed by Debtor's
assistant secretary, Kelly Unger, the Debtor disclosed assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities in the same amount. Bresset &
Santora, LLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.



BURLESON HOME: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Burleson Home Furnishings, Corp.

                  About Burleson Home Furnishing

Burleson Home Furnishing, Corp. and its affiliate, Parker Quality
Wood Product, LLC, filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Lead Case No.
20-10960) on Aug. 27, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
had estimated assets of between $500,001 and $1,000,000 and
liabilities of between $1,000,001 and $10,000,000.  Judge H.
Christopher Mott oversees the case.  Hajjar Peters, LLP serves as
the Debtors' legal counsel.


CBAK ENERGY: Amends Promissory Notes with Atlas Sciences
--------------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed, on July 24, 2019, CBAK Energy Technology,
Inc. entered into a securities purchase agreement with Atlas
Sciences, LLC, pursuant to which the Company issued a promissory
note to the Lender.  The First Note has an original principal
amount of $1,395,000, bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and
would mature 12 months after the issue date, unless earlier paid or
redeemed in accordance with its terms.  The Company received
proceeds of $1,250,000 after an original issue discount of $125,000
and payment of the Lender's expenses of $20,000.

On Dec. 30, 2019, the Company entered into another securities
purchase agreement with the Lender, pursuant to which the Company
issued a promissory note to the Lender, which has an original
principal amount of $1,670,000, bears interest at a rate of 10% per
annum and will mature 12 months after the issue date, unless
earlier paid or redeemed in accordance with its terms.  The Company
received proceeds of $1,500,000 after an original issue discount of
$150,000 and payment of Lender's expenses of $20,000.

Pursuant to the Notes, beginning on the date that is six months
after the Purchase Price Date of the respective Note, Lender will
have the right, exercisable at any time in its sole and absolute
discretion, to redeem any amount of outstanding balance of each
Note up to $250,000.00 per calendar month.

Starting on Jan. 27, 2020, the Company entered into multiple
exchange agreements with the Lender.  Pursuant to each Exchange
Agreement, the parties partitioned a new promissory note in various
original principal amounts from the outstanding balance of the
Notes and exchanged the partitioned promissory note for the
issuance of shares of the Company's common stock to the Lender.
Each above exchange was entered into and consummated through mutual
negotiations between the parties on a case-by-case basis and in
each case, the Company had the option to decide whether to agree to
exchange the debt into its common stock.

In order to reduce the transaction costs, on Oct. 2, 2020, the
Company and the Lender entered into certain Amendment to Promissory
Notes, pursuant to which the Lender has the right at any time until
the outstanding balance of the Notes has been paid in full, at its
election, to convert all or any portion of the outstanding balance
of the Notes into shares of common stock of the Company.  The
conversion price for each conversion will be calculated pursuant to
the following formula: 80% multiplied by the lowest closing price
of the Company common stock during the 10 trading days immediately
preceding the applicable conversion.  Notwithstanding the
foregoing, in no event will the Conversion Price be less than
$1.00.  In addition, the total cumulative number of shares of
common stock issued to the Lender under the Notes including all
shares of common stock that have been previously issued pursuant to
the Exchange Agreements may not exceed the limitation under Nasdaq
Listing Rule 5635(d).  Once the Nasdaq 19.99% Cap is reached, any
remaining outstanding balance of the Notes must be repaid in cash.

                        About CBAK Energy

Dalian, China-based CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., formerly China
BAK Battery, Inc. -- http://www.cbak.com.cn-- is engaged in the
business of developing, manufacturing and selling new energy
highpower lithium batteries, which are mainly used in the
following
applications: electric vehicles; light electric vehicles; and
electric tools, energy storage, uninterruptible power supply, and
other high power applications.

CBAK Energy reported a net loss of $10.85 million for the yearended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $1.96 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company had  $92.41
million in total assets, $77.28 million in total liabilities, and
$15.12 million in total equity.

Centurion ZD CPA & Co., in Hong Kong, China, the Company's auditor
since 2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated May 14, 2020, citing that the Company has a working capital
deficiency, accumulated deficit from recurring net losses and
significant short-term debt obligations maturing in less than one
year as of Dec. 31, 2019.  All these factors raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


CHARITY TOWING: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Charity Towing & Recovery, LLC
        3027 South 45th Street
        Phoenix, AZ 85040

Business Description: Charity Towing & Recovery, LLC is a family-
                      owned and operated business that provides
                      the following services: 24/7 towing,
                      local towing, motor home towing, flatbed
                      towing, roadside assistance, winch-out
                      service, lock out service, light & medium-
                      duty towing, auto repair, and off road
                      recovery.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 20, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona

Case No.: 20-11598

Judge: Hon. Paul Sala

Debtor's Counsel: Allan D. NewDelman, Esq.
                  ALLAN D. NEWDELMAN, P.C.
                  80 East Columbus Avenue
                  Phoenix, AZ 85012
                  Tel: 602-264-4550
                  Fax: 602-277-0144
                  E-mail: anewdelman@adnlaw.net

Total Assets: $119,038

Total Liabilities: $1,462,646

The petition was signed by Kelly Guerra, member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's nine unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/KJLWU2I/CHARITY_TOWING__RECOVERY_LLC__azbke-20-11598__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


CHRISTOPHER D COLLINS: Says PCO Not Necessary
---------------------------------------------
Christopher D. Collins, M.D., P.A. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Texas to excuse the appointment of a
patient care ombudsman.

The Debtor said the immediate cause of the bankruptcy filing was to
facilitate a sale free and clear of liens of the assets of its
Advanced Dermatology Institute and to pursue a preference claim
against its former landlord. In addition, both Dr. Collins and ADI
only see patients on an outpatient basis.

           About Christopher D. Collins, M.D., P.A.

Christopher D. Collins, M.D., P.A. doing business as Collins
Advanced Dermatology Institute (ADI), is a medical group practice
located in Leander, Texas, that specializes in dermatology.

Christopher D. Collins, M.D., P.A. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 20-11136) on
October 16, 2020. In the petition signed by Christopher D. Collins,
M.D., CFO, the Debtor disclosed assets ranging between $100,000 to
$500,000 million and liabilities ranging between $1 million to $10
million.

Barron & Newburger, P.C. serves as the Debtor's counsel.

Judge Tony M. Davis is assigned to the case.



CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS: Maple Buying Laguna Beach Property for $2M
---------------------------------------------------------------
Christopher Summers asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California to authorize the sale of the real property
commonly known as 1300 Dunning Drive, Laguna Beach, California to
Maple Ridge Investments, Inc. for $2 million, subject to overbid.

The Debtor holds title to four properties, three of which are held
through the Judith L. Hoon Trust dated Feb. 23, 2009, of which the
Debtor is the Successor Trustee and sole beneficiary.  One of the
properties held through the Trust is a vacant lot in Barstow,
California with minimal value, but the other two properties are
single family residences located in high value areas of Orange
County.

The Debtor's residence, located at 24702 El Camino Capistrano, Dana
Point, California has a scheduled value of $1.4 million.  The other
trust property, the Laguna Beach Property, has a scheduled value of
$2.3 million.  Both properties are encumbered by a
cross-collateralized loan with an estimated balance of $1.85
million in favor of Red Leaf Servicing.

Prior to the Petition Date, a foreclosure proceeding was commenced
on the Red Leaf Loan on both the Residence and Laguna Beach
Property, which were scheduled to be sold pursuant to a Trustee
Sale on Sept. 3, 2020.  The Trustee's Sales were stayed by virtue
of the automatic stay.

Immediately after the Petition Date, the Debtor engaged a real
estate broker to sell the Laguna Beach Property.  Subject to
bankruptcy court approval and overbid, the Debtor has accepted an
order to sell the Laguna Beach Property to the Buyer.  Although the
proposed sale may generate minimal cash for the estate, it will pay
in full the Real Leaf Loan thus unencumbering the Debtor's $1.4
million Residence, and will avoid the potential loss of both
properties through foreclosure.  Accordingly, the Debtor believes
that the proposed sale, subject to Court approval and overbid, is
in the best interests of the Estate and its creditors.

The Property is a 1,300 square foot single family residence, with
three bedrooms and two baths.
  Prior to Petition Date, the Property was listed for sale off and
on for in excess of a year, with the listing price being lowered at
one point to $2 million.  Only one offer was received pre-petition,
just under $2 million.  Accordingly, The Debtor believes that the
current proposed sale is for fair market value.

Subject to the Court's approval and subject to overbid, the Debtor
has accepted an offer of the Buyer to sell the Property for a
purchase price of $2 million, pursuant to their Residential
Purchase Agreement and related documents.  The proposed sale
requires escrow to close within 15 days of Court approval.  The
Buyer has paid $25,000 in earnest money and has provided proof of
at least $975,000 is cash and financing for $1 million.

The proceeds of sale will be used as follows: (i) Pay off first
deed of trust - $1.85 million (est). (ii) Broker's commission/costs
- $95,000 (est), and (iii) Real Property taxes - $20,0000 (est.).
The estimated net proceeds willl be $35,000.

Concurrently with the filing of the Motion, the Debtor has filed an
application to employ Team Laguna INC and Danielle Purcell as real
estate agent for the Estate.  The proposed agreement asks to
compensate with a commission equal to 4.5% of the purchase price,
with the commission to be shared with the Buyer's broker.  If the
Estate's agent is also the broker for the Buyer, the commission
will be reduced to 4%.  Ms Purcell and Team Laguna INC have acted
promptly and professionally in order to find a willing buyer and
will continue to market and show the Property through the hearing
date in order to find overbidders.

In order to obtain the highest and best price for the benefit of
the estate, the Debtor proposes that the foregoing sale be subject
to overbid. Notice is being provided of the opportunity for
overbidding to all persons who have expressed interest in the
Property.  Additionally, the Debtors Real Estate Agent will
continue to market and show the Property in order to generate
interest from overbidders.

Only Qualified Bidders may submit an overbid.  The Debtor believes
that an initial overbid of at least $25,000 more than the economic
value of the current offer is appropriate such that the initial
overbid would need to be $2,025,000.  He asks that the Court fixed
subsequent bids in increments of $10,000 or such other amount as
the Court may approve at the time of the hearing.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y2cfe5ow from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Christopher Summers sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 20-12488) on Sept. 2, 2020.


CINEMARK HOLDINGS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B' on Film Delays
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
Cinemark Holdings Inc. to 'B' from 'B+', removed all of its ratings
from CreditWatch with negative implications, and revised the
outlook to negative.

The outlook reflects the risk that the coronavirus' effects may
last longer than expected and/or the shift toward
direct-to-consumer distribution could accelerate, resulting in a
permanent weakening of the exhibitors' business and Cinemark's
credit metrics.

The coronavirus pandemic will continue to affect theater attendance
and consumer behavior into 2021.

S&P anticipates global cinema attendance will not begin to recover
until 2021, which is later than the rating agency had previously
expected. This is due to the ongoing pandemic, continued delays of
film releases by major studios, and the risk that global
authorities could impose stricter lockdown measures to limit local
resurgences of the virus. S&P thinks cinema attendance will remain
constrained by consumers' health and safety concerns and
social-distancing measures until an effective treatment or vaccine
becomes widely available--which could be around mid-2021--and will
not recover to 2019 levels (on a per-film basis) until 2022. In
addition, any potential second wave of the virus this winter could
force Cinemark to reclose its theaters.

The rating agency expects studios to continue to delay large
tentpole releases until operating conditions normalize.

S&P believes theaters will remain the only place to fully monetize
a large-budget film, even with the increased prevalence of
direct-to-consumer platforms. This has been supported by studios'
recent decisions to delay large films, such as Walt Disney's "Black
Widow," MGM's "No Time to Die," and Warner Brothers' "Dune,"
instead of releasing these films as premium video on-demand (PVOD)
rentals or placing them on streaming platforms. Studios need to
fully monetize their considerable investments in these tentpole
films, which means they likely cannot be released into an
environment of capacity restrictions and health concerns. Theater
operators are heavily dependent on these tentpole releases as they
drive the vast majority of box office attendance. This creates a
circular problem where studios will likely need to feel comfortable
that their audience is willing to attend theaters, but it will be
difficult for many theaters to remain in business and demonstrate a
healthy audience without these films. S&P believes large tentpole
films likely won't be released until a vaccine or treatment is
readily available and that films will continue to be delayed until
that occurs. S&P assumes a COVID-19 vaccine will be widely
available in mid-2021. Thus, the rating agency believes there is
considerable risk that films that were rescheduled for release in
the first half of 2020 may be delayed further.

Studios will continue to challenge the traditional theatrical
release window and may continue to favor PVOD or streaming for
small to midsize films after the pandemic ends.

Exhibitors have always strongly opposed a change to the 90-day
theatrical window. However, with the industry struggling because of
the virus, they do not have the same negotiating leverage as they
did pre-pandemic.

"We believe it is inevitable that the window shrinks or becomes
more flexible across the industry. As most of a film's box office
receipts occur in the first three weeks after release, we don't
expect a moderately shorter or flexible window to materially weaken
theaters' competitive position." However, if the window becomes too
short, such that customers are more willing to wait for films to be
released in-home, this could cannibalize box office revenue," S&P
said.

Alternatively, studios could release more films through PVOD or
directly to their proprietary streaming platforms, as Disney and
Universal have done during the pandemic. Although S&P believes
theatrical releases will remain the optimal way to fully monetize
large-budget films, studios could permanently shift more small to
midsize titles toward streaming and PVOD. A permanent reduction to
the theatrical film slate could prevent total box office attendance
from ever returning to pre-pandemic levels.

S&P believes Cinemark has enough liquidity to fund its operations
through the pandemic, but S&P now expects it to operate with
leverage above 5x through 2021 and into 2022.

In August 2020, the company issued $460 million in convertible
notes due 2025 (unrated). Accounting for the convertible notes,
$571 million of cash on hand as of June 30, 2020, and about $150
million-$170 million cash burned in the third quarter of 2020, S&P
anticipates Cinemark's pro forma cash balance was $800 million-$850
million on Sept. 30, 2020. Cinemark's lease expense as a percentage
of total revenue is much lower than its peers AMC and Regal, and
Cinemark is less dependent on rent deferrals and abatements to
manage its cash burn. Therefore, S&P expect it is more likely that
Cinemark will remain open even if attendance remains low and the
film slate continues to shift. S&P expects Cinemark's monthly cash
burn to remain in the $50 million-$60 million range whether
theaters are open or closed until significant attendance returns.
At that rate of cash burn, Cinemark has enough liquidity to last
through 2021 and into 2022 without substantial attendance. However,
Cinemark's cash balance was raised mostly through debt, and as it
burns more of its cash it increases its debt burden and future
leverage profile. S&P expects leverage will remain above 5x through
2021 and potentially beyond.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors for this
credit rating change:

-- Health and safety

The negative outlook reflects the risk that a longer than expected
impact from the coronavirus and/or an acceleration in the shift
toward direct-to-consumer distribution could result in a permanent
weakening of exhibitors' business and Cinemark's credit metrics.

S&P could lower its ratings if:

-- Cinemark's cash burn is higher than expected or accelerates
over the next 12 months resulting in an expectation that the
company will not have enough liquidity to fund its operations until
significant attendance resumes.

-- It appears that a coronavirus vaccine or treatment is unlikely
by mid-2021 such that S&P expects theater attendance to remain weak
for a longer period of time.

-- If PVOD and streaming become the primary distribution model for
a significant portion of the film slate such that S&P believes
there will be permanent damage to the box office.

-- S&P could revise the outlook to stable if there is clarity on a
potential coronavirus vaccine or treatment such that it expects
attendance to return within 80% of 2019 levels over the next 12
months.


CIVITAS HEALTH: JCAHO Accreditation Underway
--------------------------------------------
Arthur E. Peabody, Jr., the patient care ombudsman for Civitas
Health Services, Inc. filed with the Bankruptcy Court a report
setting forth his most recent evaluation of the care and treatment
afforded to clients being served by Civitas.

The PCO determined that all Civitas employees providing therapy to
residents have active up-to-date licenses issued by the
Commonwealth of Virginia. Additionally, the PCO did not find any
systemic deficiencies in the care being afforded to Civitas
patients by its professionals.

The PCO found out that Civitas filed an application for
accreditation by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations.  JCAHO's mission is to evaluate health
care organizations and inspire them to excel in providing safe and
effective care of the highest quality and value.

Just prior to the PCO's visit, the Civitas program was surveyed by
JCAHO on October 6-8 to evaluate compliance with JCAHO's standards.


The PCO commended the Civitas program, its leadership, and all of
its staff for undertaking this process. Although the outcome of the
survey is not yet known, the PCO is optimistic.

A copy of the PCO Report dated October 12, 2020, is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/y4df6w8q at no extra
charge.

                About Civitas Health Services

Civitas Health Services, Inc. --http://www.civitashealth.com/-- is
a healthcare company in Henrico, Va., that specializes in providing
mental health skill building services, therapeutic day treatment,
intensive in-home services, outpatient therapy, ABA therapy,
substance abuse services, and peer recovery services.

Civitas Health Services filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Va. Case No. 19-34993) on Sept. 24, 2019 in Richmond, Va.  In the
petition signed by Lemar Allen Bowers, chief executive officer and
president, the Debtor was estimated to have at least $50,000 in
assets and between $1 million and $10 million in liabilities.  

Judge Kevin Huennekens oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped The
McCreedy Law Group, PLLC as its legal counsel.

Arthur E. Peabody, Jr. was appointed as the Patient Care Ombudsman
on January 28, 2020.



DEKALB-JACKSON WATER: S&P Raises Revenue Debt Rating to 'BB'
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its rating on DeKalb-Jackson Water Supply
District Inc. (DKJWD), Ala.'s utility revenue debt three notches to
'BB' from 'B' and raised its rating on DeKalb-Jackson Cooperative
District's (DKJCD) revenue debt two notches to 'B+' from 'B-'. The
outlook is stable.

"The upgrades reflect the amalgam of recent management actions and
projections of lower debt service requirements," said S&P credit
analyst Scott Sagen. Management raised water rates for those
customers that are high volume users, and the rate increase takes
effect in January 2021. In addition, management identified cost
savings that should also lead to improving financial performance.
By virtue of the water rate adjustment, S&P no longer views
management as lacking a willingness to adjust rates, which had
previously constrained the rating. The rating remains in the
speculative grade category because of expectations of thin debt
service coverage, largely attributable to the need for the water
system to subsidize a gas system that is not fully
self-supporting.

S&P has maintained a two-notch differential between its ratings on
DKJWD senior-lien debt and DKJCD debt due to the latter's
subordinate pledge of water revenues, per paragraph 24 of the
rating agency's Waterworks criteria. Because DKJWD senior-lien debt
accounts for 42% of total debt outstanding, S&P thinks
subordinate-lien bondholders are materially disadvantaged.

The rating reflects the application of S&P's "U.S. Public Finance
Waterworks, Sanitary Sewer, And Drainage Utility Systems: Rating
Methodology And Assumptions" criteria. In accordance with the
"Methodology: Rating Approach to Obligations With Multiple Revenue
Streams" (published Nov. 29, 2011), the rating reflects S&P's
combined strength analysis of the multiple revenue streams pledged
to the bonds and included in its rate covenant and additional bonds
test (ABT). Specifically, the rating reflects the combined strength
of the pledges because the revenues are pledged on a combined basis
and are part of the same flow of funds.

The cooperative district was established to allow the water supply
district to financially support a start-up gas utility, the Upper
Sand Mountain Gas District (USMGD). As of the end of fiscal 2020,
the cooperative district had $33 million in long-term debt
outstanding ($14 million in water district debt and $19 million in
gas district debt). Because the gas system is not fully
self-supporting, it benefits from its relationship with DJWSD's
subordinate-lien water revenue pledge.

The rating reflects S&P's opinion of the system's adequate
enterprise risk profile and vulnerable financial risk profile.

The stable outlook reflects management's recent actions, including
raising water rates on a portion of its customers in January 2021
and lowering operating expenses in fiscal 2020, which S&P believes
will support structurally balanced financial operations in fiscal
2021 due to the combined utility's lower total debt service
requirements. Due to the one-time nature of the combined utility's
elevated debt service requirements in fiscal 2020, S&P believes the
utility is better positioned to provide sufficient all-in coverage
in the future.

S&P believes the combined utility's social and governance factors,
including its service area's below-average income levels and
management's reluctance to raise water rates on the average
residential customer to support a start-up gas system is an
elevated risk compared to other rated water utilities. While
management has approved a water rate increase in January 2021 for a
portion of its customer base, S&P believes revenue-raising
flexibility is limited. However, S&P believes other social factors
(including health and safety issues related to COVID-19) and
environmental factors are in line with those of other rated
utilities. The water utility's lost revenue in business and school
closures has not been meaningful to date, and management reported
the pandemic has not affected poultry farm revenue.


DELCATH SYSTEMS: Authorized Common Shares Increased to 4.1 Million
------------------------------------------------------------------
The outstanding shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share,
of Delcath Systems, Inc. had increased by more than 5% since the
last reported Common Stock outstanding.

As of Oct. 15, 2020, the Company had 4,090,249 shares of Common
Stock issued and outstanding.  The increase in outstanding shares
of Common Stock is due to (i) the conversion of 752 shares of
Series E Convertible Preferred Stock into 75,200 shares of Common
Stock, (ii) the exercise of 66,720 Series F warrants to purchase
66,720 shares of Common Stock and (iv) the purchase of 54,188
shares of Common Stock in the Company's "at the market offering."

                         About Delcath Systems

Headquartered in New York, NY, Delcath Systems, Inc. --
http://www.delcath.com/-- is an interventional oncology company
focused on the treatment of primary and metastatic liver cancers.
The Company's lead product candidate, Melphalan Hydrochloride for
Injection for use with the Delcath Hepatic Delivery System, or
Melphalan/HDS, is designed to administer high-dose chemotherapy to
the liver while controlling systemic exposure and associated side
effects.  In Europe, Melphalan/HDS is approved for sale under the
trade name Delcath CHEMOSAT Hepatic Delivery System for Melphalan.

Delcath Systems reported a net loss of $8.88 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $19.22 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had
$14.21 million in total assets, $20.57 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $6.36 million.

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2018, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated March 25, 2020
citing that the Company has a significant working capital
deficiency, has incurred significant recurring losses and needs to
raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DIAMOND (BC) BV: S&P Upgrades ICR to 'B-'; Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on Diamond (BC)
B.V. to 'B-' from 'CCC+' and its issue-level ratings on all of its
debt by one notch. S&P's recovery ratings on the company's existing
debt remain unchanged.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Diamond will be
able to sustain its improved operational performance over the next
12 months.

Despite a challenging operating environment, Diamond has improved
its adjusted EBITDA margins and credit metrics. The company
experienced a sharp decline in demand in certain of its key end
markets that were most affected by the coronavirus pandemic in the
second quarter, such as hospitality, food service, and retail, but
its demand has since modestly recovered. In addition, the
heightened demand for its sanitation and infection-prevention
products has helped to offset a decline in its top-line revenue.
S&P expects the demand for these products to remain above average
for at least the next 12 months. Diamond has implemented price
increases, cost-cutting initiatives, and decreased its spending on
transition and transformation projects, which has helped to
substantially improve its earnings and margins. Because those
ongoing transformation costs have been depressing S&P's view of the
company's EBITDA, S&P now expects its EBITDA to rise by over 30% in
2020, relative to 2019, and forecast its margins will be in the
mid-teens percent area. In addition, S&P now anticipates its
weighted average debt to EBITDA will between 7x and 8x, which
compares with its previous expectation of about 10x. However, this
is still weaker than the leverage levels at its 'B'-rated specialty
chemical company peers, such as ASP Emerald Holdings LLC, which
have weighted average debt to EBITDA of between 5x and 6x.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that Diamond will maintain
appropriate credit metrics for the current rating over the next 12
months. S&P believes the company's financial policies will continue
to support an improvement in its credit measures and expect that
its weighted average debt to EBITDA will between 7x and 8x. Given
the highly fragmented nature of the industry Diamond competes in,
S&P expects it to pursue both organic and inorganic growth
opportunities. However, S&P believes that any acquisitions will be
bolt-on in nature and thus not lead to a material increase in its
debt leverage.

S&P continues to assess Diamond's business risk as fair. Its
ratings reflect the diversity of the company's end markets and
geographies. It believes Diamond will benefit from the coronavirus
pandemic due to the heightened demand for its hygiene and cleaning
products. Going forward, S&P does not expect the demand to remain
elevated like it was in 2020; however, consumer lifestyle changes
could lead to increased demand compared with historical levels.
Partially offsetting these strengths are Diamond's margins, which
lag behind those of market leader Ecolab, as well as its high debt
leverage. S&P expects the company's margins to continue to improve
over the next two years as it benefits from management's
cost-saving initiatives, a return to positive revenue growth, and
lower transition expenses.

The stable outlook reflects that, despite the current recessionary
environment, S&P expects the company to maintain appropriate credit
measures for the current rating. In its base-case forecast, S&P
assumes relatively flat top-line growth in 2020 due to subdued
demand in the company's hospitality and food service subsectors,
which will be offset by rising demand for its sanitation products.
However, S&P expects Diamond's S&P-adjusted EBITDA to improve by
30% compared with 2019 even with the limited top-line growth. This
is due to the lower expenses and reduced expenditure required to
complete its transition to a stand-alone entity following its
separation from Sealed Air. S&P's outlook remains favorable in
terms of long-term demand growth trends because the rating agency
expects the demand for the sanitation products to remain elevated.
For the current rating, S&P expects weighted average debt to EBITDA
of between 7x and 8x.

"We could raise our ratings on Diamond in the next 12 months if the
macroeconomic environment recovers quickly from the coronavirus
pandemic with limited signs of permanent demand destruction. We
could also raise our ratings if the company proves to be more
resilient than our base-case assumptions despite the macroeconomic
headwinds," S&P said.

If Diamond's EBITDA margins exceed S&P's expectations by over 100
basis points (bps), this would lead to an improvement in its credit
measures, including weighted-average debt to EBITDA of sustainably
below 7x, which is a level S&P would consider appropriate for a
higher rating. This could occur if there is a sharper-than-expected
recovery in 2021, the company completes its transformation
initiatives in a timely manner and further reduces its special
charges, management's cost-reduction initiatives are successful,
and it reports stronger-than-expected profitability. S&P would also
need to view Diamond's improved leverage as sustainable and
consistent with its financial policies and objectives.

S&P could lower its ratings on Diamond in the next 12 months if its
operating performance deteriorates significantly because of
unexpected challenges with its transformation and cost-reduction
initiatives. Delays or cost overruns in its transformation efforts
could lead to lower profitability than S&P assumes in its base-case
forecast as well as weaker credit measures. In particular, S&P
could lower its rating if Diamond's EBITDA margins underperform its
expectations by 400 bps, causing its debt to EBITDA to approach 10x
for a longer-than-expected period. This could also occur if its
EBITDA margins are pressured due to rising raw material costs that
the company is unable to pass through to its customers. S&P could
also lower its rating if the company undertakes a large, unexpected
debt-funded acquisition that increases its leverage. Lastly, S&P
could consider a downgrade if unexpected cash outlays or business
challenges reduce Diamond's liquidity such that its ratio of
liquidity sources to uses falls below 1.2x and the rating agency
expects the cushion under its covenants to become tight.


DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE: U.S. Trustee Appoints Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of The Roman Catholic
Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York.

The committee members are:

     1. John Daly
     2. Richard Tollner
     3. Keith Lizzi
     4. Charles d’Estries
     5. John Refior
     6. Patricia Romano
     7. Ursula Moore, as guardian for minor children
     8. Michael Miskell
     9. John Shields
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

              About the Diocese of Rockville Centre

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York is the
seat of the Roman Catholic Church on Long Island.  The Diocese has
been under the leadership of Bishop John O. Barres since February
2017.  The State of New York established the Diocese as a religious
corporation in 1958.  The Diocese is one of eight Catholic dioceses
in New York, including the Archdiocese of New York.  The Diocese's
total Catholic population is approximately 1.4 million, roughly
half of Long Island's total population of 3.0 million.  The Diocese
is the eighth largest diocese in the United States when measured by
the number of baptized catholics.

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 20-12345) on Sept.
30, 2020.  The Diocese was estimated to have $100 million to $500
million in assets and liabilities as of the filing.

The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman is the case judge.

The Diocese has tapped Jones Day as legal counsel, Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as restructuring advisor, and Sitrick and
Company, Inc. as communications consultant.  Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC is the claims agent.


DRAFT BARS: Triable Issue Exists on Unjust Enrichment Claim vs ABL
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned DRAFT BARS LLC, Plaintiff(s), v.
ANHEUSER-BUSCH LLC, a Nevada limited liability company;
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC, a Missouri limited liability company,
Defendant(s), Adversary No. 17-01176-gs (Bankr. D. Nev.),
Defendants Anheuser-Busch LLC and Anheuser-Busch Companies LLC
moved for dismissal or partial summary judgment against
plaintiff/debtor Draft Bars LLC's claims for breach of contract
(Count I), breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing (Count II), unjust enrichment (Count III), and promissory
estoppel (Count IV). Anheuser-Busch contracted with Draft Bars to
construct a number of mobile units for use at various events across
the country. Though Anheuser-Busch purchased these mobile units, it
also agreed that Draft Bars could retain and manage these units for
a period of time.

The dispute between the parties rested with the agreement, or lack
thereof, pursuant to which Draft Bars could operate the mobile
units. Draft Bars argued that Anheuser-Busch contractually agreed
to Draft Bars' retention and use of the mobile units so long as
they were used to sell only Budweiser beer. Anheuser-Busch denied
any such contract, though the record demonstrates that it had Draft
Bars store and operate some of the mobile units Draft Bars
constructed.

Bankruptcy Judge Gary Spraker found summary judgment in favor of
Anheuser-Busch appropriate against Draft Bars' claims breach of
contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing, and promissory estoppel. Judge Spraker, however, denied
summary judgment on the debtor's claim of unjust enrichment as
there remains genuine issues of material fact on that claim.

Draft Bars is a Nevada business, wholly owned by Michael Manion,
that constructed mobile bar units referred to as "Bar Pods," which
Draft Bars refers to as "mobile assets." Beginning in 2015,
Anheuser-Busch placed nine purchase orders with Draft Bars for nine
Bar Pods. Anheuser-Busch and their distributors used the Bar Pods
to market Budweiser beer at various events in an effort to increase
consumer exposure. Draft Bars constructed and delivered a number of
the Bar Pods to Anheuser-Busch, but not all of them.

Draft Bars filed its voluntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition on
Dec. 16, 2016. Shortly after filing the bankruptcy, Draft Bars sent
a letter to Anheuser-Busch notifying it of the bankruptcy filing
and its inability to complete the Bar Pod it was constructing. The
letter also sets forth Draft Bars' grievances against
Anheuser-Busch, detailing its position regarding its history with
Anheuser-Busch and the alleged breach of the Sustainable
Marketplace Agreement.

Draft Bars operated in chapter 11 for roughly a year and a half
before its case was converted to chapter 7 on May 16, 2018. Before
the conversion of the case to chapter 7, Draft Bars commenced this
adversary proceeding against Anheuser-Busch. Draft Bars continues
to assert that the Sustainable Marketplace Agreement was in place,
and per Opsahl's testimonial, was intended to be in place for many
years. It accordingly sues for breach of contract (Count I), breach
of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count II),
unjust enrichment (Count III), and promissory estoppel (Count IV).

Anheuser-Busch initially sought dismissal of the complaint under
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). That motion was denied. It sought summary
judgment on the breach of contract and breach of implied covenant
of good faith and fair dealing causes of action based on Draft
Bars' statements that no such contract existed. Alternatively,
Anheuser-Busch argued that Draft Bars cannot recover any lost
profits as a matter of law, because the putative contract was
terminable at will. Anheuser-Busch also sought summary judgment on
Draft Bars' claims for unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel on
the basis that Draft Bars' calculations of damages are unreliable,
and that any management-related costs Draft Bars might have
incurred were its own responsibility, at least until after
Anheuser-Busch retrieved the Bar Pods. Finally, Anheuser-Busch
asked the court confirm its right to setoff any liability that it
may owe the estate against its prepetition claim against Draft
Bars.

After careful analysis of the facts and evidence presented, Judge
Spraker granted summary judgment in favor of Anheuser-Busch on
Count I. While the issue of the existence of the Sustainable
Marketplace agreement is narrowly decided in favor of
Anheuser-Busch, no genuine issue of material fact exists regarding
whether the Sustainable Marketplace agreement was terminable at
will, and thus Draft Bars may not recover lost profits damages
under Nevada law.

Judge Spraker also granted summary judgment in favor of
Anheuser-Busch on Count II. Draft Bars has failed to delineate
which, if any, conduct of Anheuser-Busch's constitutes solely a
breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and not also
grounds for the breach of contract claim; and Damages are not
available under the underlying breach of contract claim, and Draft
Bars has not proven any other damages that could be awarded under
Count II.

Summary judgment was denied as to Count III, however, as there is a
triable issue of material fact. Anheuser-Busch raised a limited
challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting Draft Bars'
damage calculation for its unjust enrichment claim. Specifically,
Anheuser-Busch argued that the calculation is impermissibly based
on Draft Bars' proposal. However, Anheuser-Busch did not explain
why Draft Bars' valuation of its services was an insufficient basis
for computing its damages. Generally speaking, in the bankruptcy
context an owner is entitled to offer an opinion of its property.
It reasonably follows that the owner of Draft Bars may offer an
opinion as to the value of its services. Because there is a genuine
dispute as to damages for Draft Bars' claims for unjust enrichment,
the court denied Anheuser-Busch's motion for summary judgment as to
that claim.

Summary judgment was granted in favor of Anheuser-Busch on Count IV
as Draft Bars has failed to establish a promise necessary to
support its claim for promissory estoppel.

Finally, Judge Spraker granted summary judgment in favor of
Anheuser-Busch's affirmative defense of setoff and it may setoff
any mutual, prepetition debts it may owe to the bankruptcy estate
as a result of this adversary against its prepetition claim against
Draft Bars.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision is available at
https://bit.ly/3kgn8s4 from Leagle.com.

                     About Draft Bars LLC

Draft Bars LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 16-16656) on Dec. 15, 2016. The
petition was signed by Michael Manion, its managing member.  At
the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Mike K. Nakagawa.  Christine A Roberts, Esq., at
The Furnier Muzzo Group LLC serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.
The case was converted to chapter 7 on May 16, 2018.


EARTH ENERGY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Earth Energy Renewables, LLC
        PO Box 2185
        Attn Jeff Wooley, Manager
        Canyon Lake, TX 78133-0009

Business Description: Earth Energy Renewables, LLC --
                      http://www.ee-renewables.com--
                      is a company focused on commercializing bio
                      -based chemicals and fuels.  The company has

                      demonstrated success in creating high-margin
                      green alternatives to petroleum-based
                      products.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 20, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas

Case No.: 20-51780

Judge: Hon. Ronald B. King

Debtor's Counsel: Frank B. Lyon, Esq.
                  FRANK B LYON
                  3508 Far West Ste 170
                  Austin, TX 78731-3041
                  Tel: (512) 345-8964
                  E-mail: frank@franklyon.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Jeff Wooley, manager.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/X6BPNMY/Earth_Energy_Renewables_LLC__txwbke-20-51780__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Agilent Technologies                                     $7,088
4187 Collections Ce...
Chicago, IL 60693-0001

2. BMWK Group LLC                                          $25,000
PO Box 6713
Bryan, TX 77805-6713

3. Brazos County                                            $9,643
Kristeen Roe, Tax A/c
4151 County Park Ct
Bryan, TX 77802

4. CardmemberVISA                                          $11,580
PO Box 79408
Saint Louis, MO 63179-0408

5. Concurrencies                                          $160,000
Adriaan van Bleijenburgstraat 22
3311LB Dordrechi
Kingdom of the Netherlands

6. Dunaway/UDG                                              $6,320
550 Bailey Ave, Suit...
Fort Worth, TX 76107

7. Dunn Heat Exchangers, Inc                                $5,196
Po Box 644003
Dallas, TX 75264-4003
Tel: (409) 948-1704

8. EE-TDF Cleveland LLC                                    $51,586
1400 S Travis Ave
Cleveland, TX 77327-8403
Tel: (281) 659-0090

9. Endress + Hauser, Inc.                                   $4,060
Dept 78795
Detroit, MI 48278-0795

10. First Glendenan Advisors LLC                            $7,320
C/O Andreas Vietor
5128 Applegate Lane
Dallas, TX 7528

11. Global Management Partners                              $5,000
1701 Directors Boulevard Suite 300
Austin, TX 78744

12. Hamilton Clark Sustainable Cap                         $19,527
1701 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Suite
200 Washington, DC 20006

13. Lipid Technologies LLC                                 $25,200
1600 19th Ave Sw
Austin, MN 55912-1778

14. Norton Rose Fulbright                                  $28,925
Po Box 122613
Dallas, TX 75312-2613

15. O'Keefe IP Counseling                                  $12,565
8127 Mesa Dr. B206-62
Austin, TX 78759

16. Omeara Consulting LLC                                 $138,205
407 Sinclair Ave Se
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403-1828

17. S-Con Services Inc                                     $85,220
Po Box 394
Bryan, TX 77806-0394

18. Texas A & M University                                 $57,500
Dept of Chemistry Fin Mgmt Ops,
AR Dept
6000 Tamu
College Sta, TX 77843-0001

19. Williams Scotsman, Inc                                  $6,192
Po Box 91975
Chicago, IL 60693-1975

20. Zeep Incorporated                                      $20,000
13505 Galleria Cir Ste W-200
Austin, TX 78738


ED'S BEANS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ed's Beans, Inc.
          DBA Kiva Han Coffee
          DBA Crazy Mocha
        711 Thomson Park Drive
        Cranberry Twp, PA 16066

Business Description: Ed's Beans, Inc. is a privately held
                      company in the specialty food stores
                      industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 19, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Pennsylvania

Case No.: 20-22974

Debtor's Counsel: Crystal H. Thornton-Illar, Esq.
                  LEECH TISHMAN FUSCALDO & LAMPL, LLC
                  825 William Penn Place
                  28th Floor
                  Pittsburgh, PA 15219
                  Tel: 412-261-1660
                  Email: cthornton-illar@leechtishman.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Ed Wethil, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/AIFFFNQ/Eds_Beans_Inc__pawbke-20-22974__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAM


EVEREST REAL ESTATE: PCO Says Quality of Care Maintained
--------------------------------------------------------
Thomas A. Mackey, the court-appointed patient care ombudsman for
Everest Real Estate Investments, LLC, filed a report on his first
visit on October 2 at the Debtor's facility.  The PCO says the
patient care provided by the Debtor continues to be delivered in a
manner equal to/better than what was delivered prior to filing
Chapter 11.

The PCO determined that the Debtor's various licenses (hospital,
laboratory, pharmacy) are current and in good standing.  The PCO
also observed that the Debtor is adequately staffed for the number
of patients -- there has been no reduction in staffing as a result
of Chapter 11. The PCO further observed that the personnel
interviewed displayed a positive attitude of change toward
providing quality and safe care to patients.

The PCO made a recommendation that the Debtor implement a system to
perform and document a drug interaction assessment on all patients
taking or being prescribed medications prior to prescribing and/or
leaving the hospital/ER.

A copy of the First PCO Report dated October 12, 2020, is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/y6q47x5o at no extra
charge.

                About Everest Real Estate Investments

Everest Real Estate Investments, LLC is a health care services
provider established in Humble, Texas specializing in general acute
care hospital.  It offers completely comprehensive medical care,
treating both major and minor injuries.  For more information,
visit www.setexaser.com.

Everest Real Estate filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 20-34077) on August 14, 2020.  In the petition signed by
Thomas Vo, M.D., majority owner of managing partner, the Debtor was
estimated to have at least $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.  

Judge Christopher M. Lopez oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped
The Gerger Law Firm, PLLC as its legal counsel.



FC COMPASSUS: S&P Affirms 'B' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed all of its ratings on Brentwood,
Tenn.-based hospice health care provider FC Compassus LLC (doing
business as Compassus), including its 'B' issuer credit rating and
'B' issue-level ratings on the company's revolver and first-lien
debt, after the company purchased a 50% controlling stake of the
Ascension at Home joint venture which it financed with equity and
the proceeds from a $75 million second-lien term loan. The
company's new second-lien term loan is unrated.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's belief that Compassus will
steadily expand its revenue and EBITDA, generate annual free cash
flow in excess of $30 million over the coming years, and maintain
leverage of about 6x.

The acquisition of a 50% ownership interest in Ascension at Home
will diversify the company's service offerings.  S&P views the
acquisition as net credit positive for Compassus because it will
diversify its business offerings. Specifically, the transaction
will expand the proportion of the company's revenue it derives from
home health services to about 20% (from about 1% previously),
reduce its concentration with Medicare payors to about 85% (from
about 94% previously), further expand its market share in the
hospice industry, and strengthen its referral base with Ascension
Health (one of the largest hospital systems in the U.S.).

However, the transaction will increase the company's leverage above
6x for 2020.  S&P has raised its leverage expectations and now
anticipates Compassus' leverage will remain in the 5.5x-6.0x range
through at least 2022, which compares with the rating agency's
previous expectation for leverage in the 4x-5x range. S&P expects
the company to remain moderately acquisitive as it continues to
expand its scale and service offerings.

S&P expects the company to report solid mid-single digit percent
revenue growth and improving margins.  Despite the increase in its
leverage, S&P projects Compassus will continue to generate solid
mid- to high-single-digit percent revenue growth fueled by periodic
moderate-size acquisitions. Reimbursement risk remains a major
concern, though S&P views the risk of adverse changes to hospice
reimbursement as unlikely over the next few years. Compassus'
adjusted EBITDA margins in the 14%-15% range are at the low end of
the range relative to those of its peer group, though S&P projects
the margins will improve as the company further increases its scale
and free cash flow.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation for steady revenue
and EBITDA growth and annual free cash flow generation in excess of
$30 million over the coming years.

"We would consider lowering our rating on Compassus if its annual
free cash flow generation declined below $10 million-$15 million.
This could occur due to unexpected integration issues, the loss of
referral partners, operational issues with its acquisitions or
de-novo expansions, or reputational issues," S&P said.

"Although unlikely given its financial-sponsor ownership, we would
consider raising our rating on Compassus if we expect it to sustain
financial leverage of less than 5x and a funds from operations
(FFO)-to-debt ratio of at least 12%," the rating agency said.


FIRST FLORIDA: PCO Finds Care Within Standards Amid COVID-19
------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Phillips, patient care ombudsman for First Florida Living
Options, LLC, filed a sixth report for the period of July 29, 2020
through October 6, 2020, finding that the nursing facilities owned
by First Florida complied with all regulatory requirements and AHCA
has not indicated any compliance issues.

During the observation period, due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19)
pandemic, the PCO conducted remote or telephonic interviews with
the administrators, directors of nursing, financial officer, and
residents of the facilities. According to interviews, there is no
indication that the residents' medical care is being neglected. It
was also reported that though there was a COVID-19 outbreak --
where 20 residents tested positive -- there was no failed process
or system and the residents were all asymptomatic. Additionally,
the nursing facility is testing all residents and staff every seven
days and results are received in 48 hours. Further, all residents
have had their flu vaccines.

The PCO also found that the nursing facility does plan on allowing
visitation when they have had more than 14 consecutive COVID-19
free days. The PCO was also told that the nursing facility will
make the front dining area the visitation area, enabling staff to
monitor visitors and residents.

A copy of the Sixth PCO Report dated October 12, 2020, is available
from PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/y3ywdyg6 at no extra
charge.

              About First Florida Living Options

First Florida Living Options LLC, formerly known as Surrey Place of
Ocala, conducts its business under the names Hawthorne Health and
Rehab of Ocala, Hawthorne Village of Ocala and Hawthorne Inn of
Ocala. The company is based in Ocala, Fla.

First Florida Living Options filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-02764) on July 22, 2019.  The petition was
signed by John M. Crock, vice president of Florida Living Options.
The Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing. Judge Jerry A.
Funk oversees the case. Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP is
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Michael Phillips has been appointed as patient care ombudsman.


FLORENCE F. SMITH: Appeal to Contest Trustee Appointment Untimely
-----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Rachel P. Kovner dismissed the appeals case
captioned FLORENCE F. SMITH, Appellant, v. JEMCAP FUNDING LLC, and
MONTROSE EQUITY PARTNERS LLC, Appellees, No. 19-CV-6020 (RPK)
(E.D.N.Y.) saying it was untimely. Appellant Florence F. Smith
brought the pro se appeal under 28 U.S.C. section 158 to contest
the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in a bankruptcy proceeding.
Appellee Montrose Equity Partners LLC and the appointed trustee,
Alan Nisselson, have each moved to dismiss the appeal, principally
on the grounds that it was untimely.

Appellant Smith is the debtor in an individual Chapter 11 case
before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District
of New York. Montrose represented that it is "the largest creditor"
in that case and the "holder of a final state court judgment of
foreclosure and sale" against Ms. Smith and two properties at issue
in the proceeding. In July 2019, Montrose moved to appoint a
Chapter 11 trustee to protect itself and Ms. Smith's other
creditors. The Bankruptcy Court entered a conditional order
authorizing the appointment of a trustee on August 26, 2019. It
then entered an order authorizing the appointment of a Chapter 11
trustee on Sept. 11, 2019. It approved the appointment of Mr.
Nisselson as trustee one week later, on Sept. 18.

On Oct. 24, 2019, the appellant filed a notice of appeal in the
Bankruptcy Court from the August 26 conditional order. The
proceedings commenced in the Court on Oct. 25, 2019. The record
does not reflect that the appellant ever sought an extension of
time to file her appeal.

According to Judge Kovner, federal district courts have
jurisdiction to hear appeals from "final judgments, orders, and
decrees" entered by bankruptcy courts. They also have
"discretionary appellate jurisdiction over an interlocutory order
of a bankruptcy court." But district courts may exercise those
forms of jurisdiction only if a litigant has filed a timely notice
of appeal. Such a notice must be filed with the bankruptcy clerk
"within 14 days after entry of the judgment, order, or decree being
appealed." If an appellant neither files an appeal nor seeks an
extension within that 14-day window, the litigant may seek a
retroactive extension within 21 days after the passage of the
deadline, if the litigant makes a showing of "excusable neglect." A
district court lacks jurisdiction to consider appeals that do not
comply with these timing requirements.

Under these principles, the appellant's failure to file a timely
notice of appeal deprived the Court of jurisdiction, according to
Judge Kovner. Ms. Smith appeared to appeal the August 26, 2019
conditional order authorizing the appointment of a Chapter 11
trustee, even though the Bankruptcy Court issued a further
appointment order on Sept. 11, 2019, and an order appointing Mr.
Nisselson as the trustee on Sept. 18, 2019. But Ms. Smith's appeal
would be untimely as to any of these orders, because Ms. Smith did
not file a notice of appeal in the Bankruptcy Court until Oct. 24,
2019. That date is 59 days after the August 26 conditional order,
43 days after the September 11 appointment order, and 36 days after
the order appointing Mr. Nisselson as trustee. The record does not
suggest that Ms. Smith filed any request for an extension of time
to file an appeal, let alone a request within the time allowed
under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8002(d). Because the
appeal is untimely, the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider it.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order is available at
https://bit.ly/2TcXKY9 from Leagle.com.

Florence F. Smith sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 19-40962) on Feb. 19, 2019.  The Debtor filed the case pro
se.


FORTOVIA THERAPEUTICS: $160K Sale of Gelclair to Helsinn Okayed
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina authorized Fortovia
Therapeutics, Inc.'s sale of its Gelclair product line to Helsinn
Healthcare SA for $160,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Oct. 13, 2020.

The Stipulation and Letter Agreement is Approved.

The sale of the Gelclair Assets free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests, and encumbrances is allowed.  Any liens will
attach to sale proceeds, with the Court reserving for later
determination the extent, validity, and priority of any such lien.

The Assumption and Assignment of the Rosemont Agreement is allowed,
and no amount is needed to cure any defaults under the contract.
  
Helsinn does not assume, have any liability for, or in any manner
be responsible for any liabilities or obligations of the Debtor,
other than the obligations set forth in the approved Letter
Agreement.

The 14-day stay period provided for in Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) does
not apply and the Order is immediately effective.

The Bankruptcy Administrator will be given 24 hours to review a
Final Agreement reached between the Debtor and the Buyer before
that agreement is executed.

If personally identifiable information is discovered and the Debtor
wishes to disclose and transfer, a separate Motion will be filed;
otherwise, personally identifiable information will not be
transferred.

All rights of setoff or recoupment against the Debtor are preserved
by the Order.

Accounts receivable are not being transferred with the approval of
the Motion.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y2qul5wk from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                     About Fortovia Therapeutics, Inc.

Fortovia Therapeutics, Inc., is an oncology supportive care
pharmaceutical and medical device company headquartered in
Raleigh,
North Carolina.

Fortovia Therapeutics, Inc., filed a voluntary petition pursuant
to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No.
20-02970) on August 31, 2020. The petition was signed by Ernest De
Paolantonio, CFO. The Debtor estimated between $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities. William P. Janvier, Esq. at
JANVIER LAW FIRM, PLLC, represents the Debtor as counsel.



FORTOVIA THERAPEUTICS: $225K Sale of Oravig Assets to Galt Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina authorized Fortovia
Therapeutics, Inc.'s sale of its Oravig product line to Galt
Pharmaceuticals, LLC for $225,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Oct. 13, 2020.

The Letter of Intent is Approved.

The Debtor is authorized to enter into a definitive asset purchase
agreement with the Buyer consistent with the terms of Letter of
Intent.  

The sale of the Oravig Assets free and clear of all liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances is Allowed.  Any liens will attach to
sale proceeds, with the Court reserving for later determination the
extent, validity, and priority of any such lien.

The Assumption and Assignment of the Vectans Agreement is Allowed,
and no amount is needed to cure any defaults under the contract.
  
The Buyer does not assume, have any liability for, or in any manner
be responsible for any liabilities or obligations of the Debtor,
other than the obligations set for in the approved agreement.

The 14-day stay period provided for in Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) does
not apply and the Order is immediately effective.

The Bankruptcy Administrator will be given 24 hours to review a
Final Agreement reached between the Debtor and the Buyer before
that agreement is executed.

If personally identifiable information is discovered and the Debtor
wishes to disclose and transfer, a separate Motion will be filed;
otherwise, personally identifiable information will not be
transferred.

All rights of setoff or recoupment against the Debtor are preserved
by the Order.

Accounts receivable are not being transferred with the approval of
the Motion.

Upon request, the Debtor will provide a copy of the Final Agreement
to the counsel for McKesson Corp. and any similarly situated party.
The Final Agreement may redact confidential information.  

A copy of the Letter of Intent is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y28wkzrt from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About Fortovia Therapeutics

Fortovia Therapeutics, Inc., is an oncology supportive care
pharmaceutical and medical device company headquartered in Raleigh,
North Carolina.

Fortovia Therapeutics, Inc., filed a voluntary petition pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No.
20-02970) on August 31, 2020. The petition was signed by Ernest De
Paolantonio, CFO.  The Debtor was estimated to have between $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  William P.
Janvier, Esq. at JANVIER LAW FIRM, PLLC, represents the Debtor.


FORTOVIA THERAPEUTICS: Sale of Soltamox Assets to Mayne Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina authorized Fortovia
Therapeutics, Inc.'s sale of its Soltamox product line to Mayne
Pharma.

In exchange, the Buyer will pay the Debtor (i) $150,000 at closing;
(ii) $200,000 when $1 million in Net Sales are achieved in one
consecutive 12-month period following the first commercial sale of
the Product by the Buyer; (iii) a 20% royalty on Net Sales for a
24-month period (with a cap of $1 million); and (iv) for inventory
on hand and transferred at close, at the Debtor's acquisition cost.


A hearing on the Motion was held on Oct. 13, 2020.

The Letter of Intent is Approved.

The Debtor is authorized to enter into a definitive asset purchase
agreement with the Buyer consistent with the terms of Letter of
Intent.  

The sale of the Oravig Assets free and clear of all liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances is Allowed.  Any liens will attach to
sale proceeds, with the Court reserving for later determination the
extent, validity, and priority of any such lien.

The Assumption and Assignment of the Rosemont Agreement is allowed,
and no amount is needed to cure any defaults under the contract.
  
The Buyer does not assume, have any liability for, or in any manner
be responsible for any liabilities or obligations of the Debtor,
other than the obligations set for in the approved agreement.

The 14-day stay period provided for in Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) does
not apply and the Order is immediately effective.

The Bankruptcy Administrator will be given 24 hours to review a
Final Agreement reached between the Debtor and the Buyer before
that agreement is executed.

If personally identifiable information is discovered and the Debtor
wishes to disclose and transfer, a separate Motion will be filed;
otherwise, personally identifiable information will not be
transferred.

All rights of setoff or recoupment against the Debtor are preserved
by the Order.

Accounts receivable are not being transferred with the approval of
the Motion.

Upon request, the Debtor will provide a copy of the Final Agreement
to the counsel for McKesson Corp. and any similarly situated party.
The Final Agreement may redact confidential information.  

A copy of the Letter of Intent is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y44mttqm from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About Fortovia Therapeutics

Fortovia Therapeutics, Inc., is an oncology supportive care
pharmaceutical and medical device company headquartered in Raleigh,
North Carolina.

Fortovia Therapeutics, Inc., filed a voluntary petition pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No.
20-02970) on August 31, 2020. The petition was signed by Ernest De
Paolantonio, CFO.  The Debtor was estimated to have between $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  William P.
Janvier, Esq. at JANVIER LAW FIRM, PLLC, represents the Debtor.


FOURTH QUARTER PROPERTIES: Seeks 2021 Plan Exclusivity Extension
----------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth Quarter Properties XXXVIII, LLC, requests the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Newnan
Division, to extend by 120 days the exclusive period during which
the Debtor may file a plan of reorganization, through and including
January 27, 2021, and to solicit acceptances, through and including
March 30, 2021.

The Debtor cites these bases for granting an extension:

     (i) The Debtor is in the process of conducting
court-authorized Rule 2004 discovery as to multiple parties (which
discovery gets at the heart of the extent, validity, and priority
of material alleged claims against the Debtor);

    (ii) The Debtor is in the process of negotiating with
third-parties potential sales of some or all of the Debtor's fee
simple and leased properties (with some of such potential sales
positioned to close in 2020 and potentially pay-off the senior
alleged lien creditor in full and other junior alleged lien
creditors in part); and

   (iii) The Debtor has a pending Motion to Assume that could bear
on its ability to reorganize; and the Court-ordered bar date is
still running, with very few of the Debtor's creditors, including
its material creditors, having filed proofs of claim.

Additionally, given the assignment of the Debtor's case that
occurred on September 28, solicitation of the pending Plan by the
November 30, 2020 date will likely be impossible. In fact, counsel
was instructed, for many good and practical reasons, to hold off on
self-noticing hearings (including the Disclosure Statement hearing)
until such time as the assignment logistics have been worked out.

Thus, the Debtor needs additional time to do all of the things that
it has already been doing on an extended basis with the continued
benefit of exclusivity.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at
https://bit.ly/33IwaYO at no extra charge.

            About Fourth Quarter Properties XXXVIII

Fourth Quarter Properties XXXVIII, LLC, is a single asset real
estate debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)), whose
principal assets are located at 45, 47, and 49 Ansley DriveNewnan,
Ga.  Fourth Quarter Properties filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ga. Case No. 20-10883) on June 1, 2020.  The Debtor previously
sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 13-10585) on
March 5, 2013.

In the petition signed by Stanley E. Thomas, its manager, the
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge W. Homer Drake oversees the case. David L. Bury, Jr., Esq.,
at Stone & Baxter, LLP, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FREEMAN HOLDINGS: Court Extends Plan Exclusivity Until Dec. 14
--------------------------------------------------------------
At the behest of Freeman Holdings, LLC, and its affiliates, Judge
Scott M. Grossman extended the periods within which the Debtors
have the exclusive right to file a plan and disclosure statement to
December 14, 2020, and to solicit acceptances of the plan to
February 15, 2021.

The Debtors will use the additional time to establish a clearer
track record of income and expenses in order to formulate a
feasible plan.

"In addition, we are currently seeking resolutions with several
creditors, which will also have a material effect on the plan," the
Debtors add.

Even though the Debtors filed a joint plan and disclosure statement
on August 17, 2020, the Debtors sought an extension in an abundance
of caution. There may be amendments needed to the existing plan,
and there may be a judicial settlement conference in October or
November 2020 which will have a material effect on the plan.

The extension will prevent any delay in the progress of the
Debtors' case and will not prejudice the legitimate interests of
creditors and other parties in interest. The Debtors are unaware of
any other party who wishes to file a competing plan.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3dIoFV6 at no extra charge.

A copy of the Court's Extension Order is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2FGIjnZ at no extra charge.

                     About Freeman Holdings
  
Freeman Holdings, LLC, and FWP Realty Holdings, LLC sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case Nos. 20-15410 and 20-15412) on May 17, 2020.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtors each had estimated assets of between
$500,001 and $1 million and liabilities of between $1 million to
$10 million.

Judge Scott M. Grossman oversees the cases. Wernick Law, PLLC is
the Debtor's legal counsel.

On June 25, 2020, the U.S. Trustee said it was unable to appoint an
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.


FREEMAN MOBILE: May Use Bank of America's Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Scott M. Grossman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division, will hold a
hearing November 17, 2020, to consider Freeman Mobile Orthodontics
PLLC's continued use of the cash collateral of lender Bank of
America.

Judge Grossman previously authorized Freeman Mobile to use the Bank
of America cash collateral on an interim basis until October 6.
Then on October 9, the Court issued another interim order
authorizing the cash collateral use and setting the November
hearing.

The court says that the Debtor may use Cash Collateral, as defined
in 11 U.S.C. section 363(a), including the cash or noncash proceeds
of assets that were not Cash Collateral on the Petition Date up to
the amounts shown in the Budget. In addition, the Debtor will pay
$6,758.94 to the Lender as further adequate protection on a monthly
basis until further Court order. The Payment will be applied to the
Lender's indebtedness as provided in the loan documents.

The postpetition liens and security interests granted to the Lender
is valid and perfected post-petition, to the extent and priority of
the prepetition lien(s), without the need for execution or filing
of any further documents or instruments otherwise required to be
filed or be executed or filed under non-bankruptcy law.

The Debtor is also ordered to serve any reports required by the
United States Trustee, including all monthly operating reports for
the prior month's operations, on the Lender. Such service may be
made on the Lender by serving its counsel via email or Court ECF.

                 About Freeman Mobile

Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based Freeman Mobile Orthodontics PLLC
provides orthodontic care to patients in different communities in
Florida.

Freeman Mobile Orthodontics PLLC and affiliate Freeman
Orthodontics, P.A., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Lead Case No. 20-15408) on May 17, 2020. Affiliates Interstellar
Disruption LLC, Freeman Holdings LLC, Freeman Holdings II LLC and
FWP Realty Holdings also sought bankruptcy protection.

On May 17, 2020, Christopher Scott Freeman, the lead orthodontics
at the practice, also filed a personal Chapter 11 case.  He
disclosed $13 million in liabilities, including four bank loans
worth $12.6 million.

The Hon. Scott M. Grossman is the case judge.

The Debtors hired Wernick Law, PLLC, as counsel.



FREEMAN MOBILE: May Use Woodforest National Bank's Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Scott M. Grossman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division, will hold a
hearing November 17, 2020, to consider Freeman Mobile Orthodontics
PLLC's continued use of the cash collateral of lender Woodforest
National Bank.

Judge Grossman previously authorized Freeman Mobile to use the
Woodforest National Bank cash collateral on an interim basis until
October 6.  Then on October 9, the Court issued another interim
order authorizing the cash collateral use and setting the November
hearing.

As a condition to permitting the Debtor to use Cash Collateral as
provided by the court, the Debtor will operate strictly in
accordance with the Budget, not to exceed 5% above the amount of
any line item shown in the Budget.

As adequate protection for the use of Cash Collateral and for any
diminution in value of the Lender's prepetition collateral as
described in the loan documents between the Debtor and the Lender,
the Lender is granted a valid, perfected lien upon, and security
interest in, all property of the Debtor generated post-petition to
the same extent and in the same order of priority of any valid
pre-petition lien. In addition, the Debtor shall pay $12,500.00 to
the Lender as further adequate protection on a monthly basis until
further order of the Court.

The court says that the post-petition liens and security interests
granted to the Lender is valid and perfected post-petition, to the
extent and priority of the prepetition lien(s), without the need
for execution or filing of any further documents or instruments
otherwise required to be filed or be executed or filed under
non-bankruptcy law.

                 About Freeman Mobile

Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based Freeman Mobile Orthodontics PLLC
provides orthodontic care to patients in different communities in
Florida.

Freeman Mobile Orthodontics PLLC and affiliate Freeman
Orthodontics, P.A., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Lead Case No. 20-15408) on May 17, 2020. Affiliates Interstellar
Disruption LLC, Freeman Holdings LLC, Freeman Holdings II LLC and
FWP Realty Holdings also sought bankruptcy protection.

On May 17, 2020, Christopher Scott Freeman, the lead orthodontics
at the practice, also filed a personal Chapter 11 case.  He
disclosed $13 million in liabilities, including four bank loans
worth $12.6 million.

The Hon. Scott M. Grossman is the case judge.

The Debtors hired Wernick Law, PLLC, as counsel.



GATEWAY FOUR: Appointment of Gottlieb as Chapter 11 Trustee Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Martin Barash of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California issued an order approving the appointment of
David K. Gottlieb as chapter 11 trustee for Gateway Four LP and its
affiliates.

               About Gateway Four LP

Gateway Four LP and its affiliates Gateway Two LP and Gateway Five
LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 20-11581) on August 31, 2020. In
the petition signed by its president, James Acevedo, Gateway Four
disclosed assets ranging between $50 million to $100 million and
liabilities ranging between $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Martin R. Barash oversees the case.

Daniel M. Shapiro, Attorney at Law serves as the Debtors' counsel,
and the Law Office of Sevan Gorginian as co-counsel.



GAVILAN RESOURCES: Seeks Plan Exclusivity Extension Thru Nov. 13
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gavilan Resources, LLC and its affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, to
extend the Debtors' exclusive periods to file a Chapter 11 plan to
and including November 13, 2020, and to obtain acceptance of the
plan through and including January 12, 2021.

Ample "cause" exists to grant an extension of the Debtors'
exclusive periods:

     (i) the Debtors' cases are complex, involving a number of
different creditor constituencies, complex business relationships,
and significant outstanding litigation;

    (ii) substantial good faith progress has been made in the
administration of chapter 11 cases and in the sale process of the
Comanche Assets; and

   (iii) an extension of the Exclusive Periods will allow the
Debtors to proceed in a rational manner through confirmation and
consummation of a chapter 11 plan and sale process, will not
prejudice any parties in interest, and will promote the Debtors'
ability to maximize their value and successfully emerge from
chapter 11.

The Debtors are party to, or otherwise have rights in, a complex
set of contractual agreements related to the operations and
management of their oil and gas assets, known in these cases as the
"Comanche Assets", including joint operating agreements, pooling
agreements, marketing agreements, and also the selling of the
Comanche Assets.

Also, the matters about the Joint Development Agreement with SN EF
Maverick and many of those agreements are the subject of unresolved
disputes in the Mesquite Energy, Inc. (f/k/a Sanchez Energy
Corporation) chapter 11 cases.  The Debtors said these pending
matters need additional time to deal with.

The extensions will afford the Debtors the full and fair
opportunity for the Debtors to finalize the sale process and
develop a viable, fair, and comprehensive plan and also negotiate,
propose, and solicit acceptances of that plan in a manner that will
maximize value for all of their economic stakeholders.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/3kaUxVb at no extra charge.

                      About Gavilan Resources

Gavilan Resources, LLC, established in July 2016, is a private
equity-backed independent exploration and production (E&P) company
headquartered in Houston, Texas, whose production is singularly
focused on the Eagle Ford Shale.

Blackstone-backed Gavilan Resources, LLC, and three affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
20-32656) on May 15, 2020, citing plummeting oil prices amid the
COVID-19 pandemic and other market conditions.

Gavilan was estimated to have $1 billion to $10 billion in assets
and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Honorable Marvin Isgur is the presiding judge. The Debtors
tapped WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP as attorneys; VINSON & ELKINS,
LLP as co-counsel; LAZARD FRERES & CO. LLC as investment banker;
and HURON CONSULTING SERVICES LLC as restructuring advisor. EPIQ
CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC, is the claims agent.


GB SCIENCES: Expects Patent to be Issued Within 3 to 12 Weeks
-------------------------------------------------------------
GB Sciences received a Notice of Allowance from the United States
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for claims protecting their
Cannabinoid Containing Complex Mixtures (CCCMs) for the Treatment
of Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS).  On October 7th, the
Company paid the patent issue fee and anticipates that the patent,
with claims protecting its MCAS therapeutics, will be issued within
3 to 12 weeks.  This patent is owned by the Company's Canadian
entity, GBS Global Biopharma, Inc. (GBS).

The Notice of Allowance signifies that claims of the patent
application were reviewed successfully and that the claims were
found patentable.  In addition, GBS has filed a continuation
application to protect and advance other therapeutic mixtures
described in the allowed patent application.  The application,
entitled "Cannabinoid-Containing Complex Mixtures for the Treatment
of Mast Cell-Associated or Basophil-Mediated Inflammatory
Disorders" was originally filed on Jan. 31, 2018 and describes
CCCMs that can be used for the treatment of Crohn's disease,
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS),
rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, allergic asthma, Chronic
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), psoriasis, eczema,
urticarias, dermatitis, mastocytosis, or anaphylactic sting.
Claims for these additional indications will be examined by the
USPTO in the future.

MCAS is a severe immunological condition in which mast cells
inappropriately and excessively release inflammatory mediators,
resulting in a range of severe chronic hyperinflammatory symptoms
and life-threatening anaphylaxis attacks.  There is no single
recommended treatment for MCAS patients.  Instead, patients, with
their doctor's guidance, attempt to manage MCAS symptoms primarily
by avoiding 'triggers' and using rescue medicines for their severe
hyperinflammatory attacks.  Therefore, MCAS patients need new
therapeutic options to control their mast cell related symptoms,
and the Company's CCCM were designed to simultaneously control
multiple inflammatory pathways within mast cells as a comprehensive
treatment option.

The Company company is strategically targeting MCAS for two
additional reasons.  By focusing on a rare disease with no known
cure, the Comopany can apply for the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration's expedited approval process, which allows
clinically successful treatments to get to market both quicker and
more cost effectively.  Gaining approval from the US FDA for the
entire anti-inflammatory market would be extremely time consuming
and cost prohibitive.  Demonstrating that our CCCM are safe for the
treatment of MCAS would favorably position our Company for clinical
testing of these CCCM as potential treatments for other related
inflammatory disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, thereby
widening the target market and drastically shortening the
development cycle and costs.

                       About GB Sciences

GB Sciences, Inc., seeks to be a biopharmaceutical research and
cannabinoid-based drug development company whose goal is to create
patented formulations for safe, standardized, cannabinoid therapies
that target a variety of medical conditions in both the
pharmaceutical and wellness markets.  The Company is engaged in the
research and development of cannabinoid medicines and plans to
produce cannabinoid therapies for the wellness markets based on its
portfolio of intellectual property.

GB Sciences reported a net loss of $13.11 million for the year
ended March 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of $24.68 million for
the year ended ended March 31, 2019.  As of June 30, 2020, the
Company had $14.37 million in total assets, $16.02 million in total
liabilities, and a total deficit of $1.65 million.

Assurance Dimensions, in Margate, Florida, the Company's auditor
since 2019, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Aug. 27, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses.  For the year ended March 31, 2020 the Company had a net
loss, had net cash used in operating activities of $4,479,713, and
had negative working capital of $3,884,877.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


GKS CORP: PCO Convinced Bidders on Residents' Rental Subsidy
------------------------------------------------------------
Michele J. Feinstein, the patient care ombudsman appointed in the
case of GKS Corporation, filed a report for the time period
covering August 11 through October 11, 2020.

During the period, the PCO reviewed the motion concerning sale
procedures, the motion for sale which included the stalking horse
proposal by VS Southwick. She also reviewed the proposals of Aspen
Square Management, Inc.; Elevation Properties, LLC; and Triple M
Investments, LLC -- the three additional qualified bidders to
participate in the auction which was conducted on September 23.

The PCO participated in the pre-auction sale call on September 22,
where she raised the question as to whether or not the bidders
would extend the subsidy arrangement to the assisted living
residents. Triple M agreed to this, and at some point in the
bidding, Triple M's terms other than price became the standard
terms and the only variable thereafter was price. Thus, the
provisions concerning the assisted living residents' rental subsidy
were included in all subsequent bids.

Consequently, the Court reviewed and approved the sale to Triple M.
The sale is scheduled to close at the end of October, subject to
Triple M obtaining a license to operate an assisted living facility
from the Executive Office of Elder Affairs, and subject to
obtaining sufficient new leases from both the existing independent
and assisted living residents.

A copy of the PCO's October 2020 Report is available at
PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/yyeq4jtb at no extra
charge.

                     About GKS Corporation

GKS Corporation -- http://www.theamericaninn.net/-- owns and
operates a continuing care retirement community and assisted living
facility for the elderly. It is a 50-acre country village setting
in Southwick, Mass., with easy access to healthcare services,
transportation, shopping and recreation.

GKS Corporation sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-30998) on Dec. 26,
2019. At the time of the filing, the Debtor listed between $1
million and $10 million in estimated assets and $10 million and $50
million in estimated liabilities.

Michael J. Goldberg, Esq., at Casner & Edwards, LLP, is the
Debtor's legal counsel.  OnePoint Partners, LLC was approved to
provide Toby Shea as Chief Restructuring Officer for the Debtor.



GODFREY C. DOUGLAS: Suit vs Dry Clean Concepts et al. Narrowed
--------------------------------------------------------------
Godfrey C. Douglas and Sandra Kim Douglas brought clawback suits
captioned Godfrey C. Douglas and Sandra Kim Douglas Plaintiffs, v.
GSJT, Inc., et al. Defendants, Adversary No. 18-00405 (Bankr. D.
Md.) against defendants Dry Clean Concepts Inc., Aaron Kawer
(president of DCC), and The Bancorp Bank. The complaint, as
amended, sought recovery of money, costs and other damages from
contracts entered and loans taken out by Plaintiffs to start a
dry-cleaning business that failed. The Defendants filed a motion to
dismiss.

In the Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs asserted these counts
against Mr. Kawer and DCC:

     Count 1: Unconscionability of contract and damages;

     Count 4: Misrepresentation and Fraud;

     Count 5: Avoidance of Fraudulent Transfers 11 U.S.C. sections
548, 550, and 551;

     Count 6: Avoidance of Fraudulent Transfers 11 U.S.C. section
544(a), (b), 550, and 551; and

     Count 8: Turnover 11 U.S.C. section 542.

In their motion, Mr. Kawer and DCC sought dismissal of Counts 1, 4,
5, and 8.

The Plaintiffs asserted these counts against the Bank:

     Count 2: Objection to the Bank's Claim

     Count 3: Violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act

     Count 5: Avoidance of Fraudulent Transfers 11 U.S.C. sections
548, 550, and 551; and

     Count 7: Avoidance of Fraudulent Transfers 11 U.S.C. sections
544(a), (b), 550, and 551.

In its motion, the Bank sought dismissal of all counts.

Bankruptcy Judge Thomas J. Catliota dismissed Counts 1, 4, 5, and 8
against DCC and Mr. Kawer, and dismissed all counts against the
Bank.

The Plaintiffs filed for chapter 13 relief on Nov. 27, 2017. They
filed a motion to convert the case to chapter 11, and the case was
converted on Nov. 19, 2018.

Prior to bankruptcy, Mr. Douglas sought to open a dry-cleaning
business. On the internet, he researched and found a consulting
company, DCC, with a principal business location of 2516 Waukegan
Road, Glenview, IL 60625. Mr. Kawer is the owner and president of
DCC, and he resides at 904 Judson Avenue, Highland Park, IL 60035.
Mr. Kawer served as the point of contact for all communications
between DCC and Mr. Douglas. DCC advertised itself as a
full-service consulting firm for starting a dry-cleaning business.
This included providing clients advice from the onset of the
business, assistance with equipment set-up, and information on
financing and service models. Mr. Kawer informed Mr. Douglas that
he had 50 years of knowledge in the business. Unlike Mr. Kawer, Mr.
Douglas did not have any experience with formulating a business
plan or owning a business.

On Jan. 27, 2015, both Plaintiffs personally signed a Deposit
Agreement with DCC.

At some point in 2015, Mr. Douglas formed GSJT, Inc., also known as
"Quick-N-Clean," for the purpose of operating the dry-cleaning
business.

On June 3, 2015, Mr. Kawer provided a statement of "Services to Be
Performed For Purchaser." The document was signed by Mr. Kawer, as
president of DCC.

Both the Plaintiffs personally signed a Purchase Contract with DCC
on July 15, 2015. The purchasers were identified as Godfrey Douglas
and Sandra Douglas. The seller was DCC. Invoice statements were
sent from DCC to Godfrey Douglas and Sandra Douglas. The total
amount of the equipment purchase was $536,410. Delivery, rigging &
freight was $21,300. The equipment installation fee was $64,420.
The grand total was $622,130.

Mr. Kawer found a realtor that Mr. Douglas used to lease the
premises for the dry-cleaning business. He found an attorney to
assist with the lease. Id. He found the loan broker, who referred
Mr. Douglas to the Bank. Mr. Kawer did not advise Mr. Douglas to
hire an attorney for help with the loan process.

GSJT obtained a Small Business Administration loan through the
Bank, guaranteed by Plaintiffs. Most, if not all of the
communications between Mr. Douglas and the Bank, were through
email. GSJT received a loan package on Oct. 23, 2015.

The Plaintiffs stated that the Bank did not communicate or disclose
the personal consequences of the loan or whether Mr. Douglas should
have the loan documents reviewed by an attorney. Based on the
advise of Robin Paganafanador, an authorized agent of the Bank, Mr.
Douglas signed the promissory note on behalf of GSJT for $613,200.
Both Plaintiffs signed an "unconditional guaranty" dated Oct. 21,
2015, and signed an Indemnity Deed of Trust ("IDOT") against their
residence. They were required by the Bank to sign the IDOT.

Mr. Kawer and DCC created a 36-month projection, and GSJT could not
meet those projections from the onset. The Plaintiffs stated their
total loss was $179,240.38 in 2016, and that the projections were
objectively unrealistic.

The Bank loan went into default on March 6, 2017, after three
monthly payments were missed. According to a copy submitted by the
Bank, Mr. Douglas filed Articles of Dissolution for GSJT on Sept.
21, 2018, at 1:00 p.m.

On Count 1 against Mr. Kawer and DCC, the Court held that the
Plaintiffs failed to state a claim for unconscionability because
there is nothing left to perform on the contract and the Plaintiffs
do not owe a debt to DCC stemming from the contract.

On Count 4 against Mr. Kawer and DCC, the Court held that the claim
for fraud failed to pass muster under the plausible standards of
Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(6) and pleading standards of Rule 9(b).

On Count 8 against Mr. Kawer and DCC, the Plaintiffs sought an
order requiring Mr. Kawer and DCC to turn over $565,000 paid under
the contracts. Section 542(a) requires a person in possession of
property of the estate to deliver the property or the value of the
property to the trustee. To prove a claim under section 542(a), the
plaintiffs have the burden to prove that: "(1) the property is in
the possession, custody or control of another entity; (2) the
property can be used in accordance with the provisions of section
363; and (3) the property has more than inconsequential value to
the debtor's estate."

The Court said the Amended Complaint does not, and cannot,
plausibly allege that the money paid in 2017 by Plaintiffs to Mr.
Kawer or DCC is property of the estate. Count 8 is dismissed
without prejudice until it is determined, if at all, that the Mr.
Kawer or DCC hold property of the estate.

On Count 3 against the Bank, the Plaintiffs argued the Bank
violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (the "ECOA") by requiring
Mrs. Douglas to sign a personal guaranty on the loan. The
Plaintiffs requested the court to "strike" the guaranty and void
the lien that supports the guaranty. In addition to attorney's
fees, the Plaintiffs also sought actual compensatory,
consequential, statutory, and punitive damages under ECOA for
$100,000. The Bank argued that under exceptions provided in the
ECOA and corresponding regulations, it was permissible to request
Mrs. Douglas to sign a personal guaranty. The Plaintiffs alleged
that the Bank dictated the percentage ownership the Plan would hold
in GSJT as a way of coercing Mrs. Douglas to provide a guaranty.

The Court held that the allegation failed to state a plausible
claim for several reasons. First, the emails show that Mr. Douglas
employed Benetrends, a third-party financial services firm, to
assist him with creating the Plan. They show that Benetrends, not
the Bank, created the Plan and structured its investment in GSJT.
Second, the emails show that Mr. Douglas's IRA contributed more
than $60,000 to the Plan, which in turn invested the funds in the
equity of GSJT, receiving 66.67% of its shares. The emails show
that Plaintiffs invested approximately $30,000 in GSJT, receiving
33.33% of its shares. The percentage ownership the Plan obtained in
GSJT was a function of the amount the Plan invested, compared to
the amount invested by Plaintiffs (or, giving effect to Plaintiffs'
allegations, Mr. Douglas alone). It was not, nor could it be, an
arbitrary percentage selected or directed by the Bank. Third, at
most, the emails show that the Bank was interested in knowing how
much was being contributed to its borrower and who was receiving
the shares; they do not support the allegation that the Bank
dictated the percentage the Plan must own in GSJT. Fourth,
Plaintiffs allegation proves too much. The Plan needed to acquire
only 20% of GSJT's shares for the Bank to obtain Mrs. Douglas's
guaranty under the regulations, but the Plan acquired 66.67% of
GSJT. Plainly, the reason the Plan acquired 66.67% of GSJT was
other than the Bank's alleged objective of obtaining Mrs. Douglas's
guaranty.

On Count 2 against the Bank, the Plaintiffs objected to the
allowance of the Bank's Proof of Claim No. 4-1 because it is based
on Plaintiffs' guaranty, which purportedly violates ECOA. The court
has dismissed the ECOA claim and therefore dismissed Count 2 to the
extent it relies on the ECOA claim for relief.

On Count 5 against the Bank, Plaintiffs sought to avoid under 11
U.S.C. section 548(a)(1) the transfer of monies from the Bank loan
and the payments to DCC and Mr. Kawer for the equipment and other
fees and charges.

The Court held that there simply is no section 548 claim stated in
the Amended Complaint that the Plaintiffs can assert, as recoupment
or otherwise. Count 5 is dismissed.

On Count 7 against the Bank, the Court held that the Plaintiffs do
not hold an equitable interest in GSJT's assets, including its
claim against the Bank. Section 544(a) cannot apply and Count 7 is
dismissed.

The bankruptcy case is in re: Godfrey C. Douglas and Sandra Kim
Douglas, Case No. 17-25757 (Bankr. D.M.D.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum of Opinion is available
at https://bit.ly/2HmhlT0 from Leagle.com.


GTT COMMUNICATIONS: Reaches $2.15B Deal to Sell Business Division
-----------------------------------------------------------------
GTT Communications, Inc. has signed a definitive purchase agreement
to sell its infrastructure division to I Squared Capital, an
independent global infrastructure investment firm, for $2.15
billion.  The infrastructure division consists of GTT's business
and activities of providing Pan-European, North American, sub-sea
and trans-Atlantic fiber network and data center infrastructure
services to customers.

GTT provides a comprehensive portfolio of cloud networking services
over its global Tier 1 IP network that includes traditional and
software-defined wide area networking, global SIP trunking,
advanced solutions, security and internet services.

"The divestment of the highly differentiated infrastructure
division assets will ensure greater focus on network investment and
development of high-speed infrastructure services under the more
specialized ownership of this experienced investor," commented
Ernie Ortega, GTT CRO and interim CEO.  "The deal enables GTT to
reinforce its capex light business model as well as its cloud
networking focus and will benefit both enterprise and
infrastructure clients alike."

Gautam Bhandari, managing partner at I Squared Capital stated, "Now
more than ever, digital infrastructure is an essential asset class
as societies across the globe rely heavily on high-speed digital
bandwidth.  This acquisition builds upon I Squared Capital's
overarching global digital infrastructure strategy and experience
with complex carve-outs to expand the reach of our platforms across
Asia, Europe and North America."

The infrastructure division sale consists of selected network and
data center assets accumulated from several GTT acquisitions,
including Interoute, Hibernia, and KPN International, that
comprise:

   * A 103,000 route kilometer fiber network with over 400 points
of
     presence, spanning 31 metro areas and interconnecting 103
     cities across Europe and North America.

   * Three transatlantic subsea cables, including GTT Express, the

     lowest latency route between Europe and North America.

   * 14 Tier 3 data centers and over 100 colocation facilities.

   * Offering a full suite of telecom and data infrastructure
     solutions to marquee clients.

The acquisition is expected to close, subject to satisfying all
required regulatory approvals and contingencies included in the
agreement, during the first half of 2021.

Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs are the financial advisors and
Goodwin Proctor LLP is acting as legal advisor to GTT on this
transaction.  Morgan Stanley acted as financial advisor and
Rothschild as debt advisor to I Squared Capital, with Solon acting
as commercial and technical advisor, KPMG as tax and accounting
advisor, Linklaters as legal advisor and Latham & Watkins as
borrower's counsel.

The total consideration includes an upfront cash payment of $2.02
billion at closing and total deferred payments of up to $130
million based on certain financial results.

                            About GTT

GTT Communications operates a Tier 1 internet network and owns a
fiber network that includes an expansive pan-European footprint and
subsea cables.  The Company's global network includes over 600
unique points of presence ("PoPs") spanning six continents, and the
Company provides services in more than 140 countries.

GTT reported a net loss of $105.9 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2019, a net loss of $243.4 million for the year ended Dec. 31,
2018, and a net loss of $71.5 million for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017.  As of March 31, 2020, the Company had $4.74 billion in total
assets, $4.54 billion in total liabilities, and $196.8 million in
total stockholders' equity.

                            *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Sept. 22, 2020, S&P Global Ratings
retained all ratings on U.S.-based internet protocol (IP) network
operator GTT Communications Inc. (GTT), including the 'CCC+' issuer
credit rating, on CreditWatch with negative implications.

Also in September, 2020, Fitch Ratings downgraded the Long-term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of GTT Communications, Inc. (GTT) and
GTT Communications BV to 'CCC' from 'B-'.  The rating action
follows the company's announcement that it received a notice of
default on Sept. 2, 2020 from holders representing 25% or more of
outstanding principal ($575 million) of the company's senior
unsecured notes, due to its noncompliance with a reporting covenant
under the notes indenture that required the company to file 2Q20
financials within the stated time frame (allowing for extensions).


GULFPORT ENERGY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'D' on Missed Interest Payment
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
exploration and production company Gulfport Energy Corp. to 'D'
from 'CCC-'. S&P also lowered its issue-level ratings on the
company's unsecured notes to 'D' from 'CCC-'.

The downgrade reflects Gulfport's decision to not make the Oct. 15,
2020, interest payment on its 6% senior unsecured notes due Oct.
15, 2024. In addition, the company announced that its borrowing
base was cut to $580 million from $700 million on Oct. 8, causing
the company to be overdrawn, including borrowings and letters of
credit. S&P does not expect the company will make the interest
payment within the 30-day grace period given its constrained
liquidity position. S&P expects the company will seek a broader
financial restructuring.


IMPRESA HOLDINGS: Dec. 7 Auction of Substantially All Assets
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brendan L. Shannon of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware authorized the bidding procedures proposed by
Impresa Holdings Acquisition Corp. and its affiliates in connection
with the sale of substantially all assets to Twin Haven Special
Opportunities Fund IV, L.P.  or its designee for (i) a credit bid
of $10 million in principal amount of loans under Twin Haven's
Secured Promissory Notes and (ii) the assumption of certain
liabilities as described in the Stalking Horse Agreement, subject
to overbid.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Dec. 2, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Initial Bid: Must exceed the amount of the Stalking Horse
Bid by at least $100,000

     c. Deposit: 10% of the purchase price

     d. Auction: If the Debtors receive one or more timely
Qualifying Bids other than the Stalking Horse Bid, then they will
conduct the Auction on Dec. 7, 2020 commencing at 10:00 a.m. (ET)
virtually by videoconference at the offices of Morris, Nichols,
Arsht & Tunnell LLP, 1201 N. Market Street, 16th Floor, Wilmington,
Delaware 19801, or on such other date and/or at such other location
or by other virtual means as determined by the Debtors in
consultation with the Lender.

     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Dec. 11, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (ET)  

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: 4:00 p.m. (ET) 21 days following
mailing of the Sale and Contract Notice

     h. Closing: Dec. 31, 2020

The Sale Notice is approved.  No later than five business days of
entry of the Bidding Procedures Order, the Debtors will serve the
Sale Notice on the Sale Notice Parties.

The Assumption and Assignment Procedures are approved.  Within five
business days following entry of the Bidding Procedures Order, the
Debtors will file with the Court and serve on each counterparty to
an Assumed Contract the Contract Notice.  The Contract Objection
Deadline is Dec. 9, 2020 at noon (ET).

Notwithstanding the possibility of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h),
6006(d), 7052, or 9014, the terms and conditions of the Bidding
Procedures will be immediately effective and enforceable upon its
entry.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y5n9jwks from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                     About Impresa Holdings

Impresa Holdings designs, manufactures, and supplies precision
sheet metal parts, CNC-machined components, and assemblies for
commercial jets, regional and business aircraft, military aircraft,
and civil/military helicopters. The company's services include
sheet metal fabrication, hydroform pressing, brake.

Impresa began operating in 1973 as Venture Aircraft and expanded
through a 2012 acquisition of Swift-Cor Aerospace.  It then changed
its name Impresa Aerospace.

Operating from a production facility in Gardena, California,
Impresa provides machined parts, fabricated components, assembled
parts and tooling for the aerospace and defense industries. In
addition to Boeing, the debtor's customers include Spirit
AeroSystems, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, Cessna, Lockheed Martin
and Gulfstream.  It has provided parts and components for Boeing's
major airframes, including the 787, 777 and 747 as well as the
Airbus A380 and Gulfstream's G550 and G650 planes.

On Sept. 24, 2020, Impresa Holdings Acquisition Corp. and its
affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 20-12399).  At the time of the filing, Impresa Holdings had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between
$10 million and $50 million.  

Robert J. Dehney, Matthew B. Harvey, Paige N. Topper and Taylor M.
Haga of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP serve as counsel to
Impresa.  Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC, is the investment banker.
Stretto is the claims agent.


INCLUSIVE HEALTHCARE: Court Waives Appointment of Ombudsman
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jeffrey P. Norman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas waived the requirement of appointment of
a medical ombudsman for Inclusive Healthcare Group, LLC upon
finding that the Debtor is offering minimally invasive and cosmetic
procedures.

A copy of the Court's Order dated October 14, 2020 is available at
PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/y28m8a4z at no extra
charge.

               About Inclusive Healthcare Group, LLC

Inclusive Healthcare Group, LLC, a Conroe, Texas-based health care
provider, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 20-34199) on August 19, 2020.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of less
than $50,000 and liabilities of between $100,001 and $500,000.

The Wiley Law Group, PLLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.



JOSHUAVILLE LLC: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Joshuaville, LLC
        111 S. Grand Ave.
        Suite 1110
        Los Angeles, CA 90015

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 19, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 20-19443

Judge: Hon. Neil W. Bason

Debtor's Counsel: Leslie A. Cohen, Esq.
                  J'aime K. Williams, Esq.
                  LESLIE COHEN LAW PC
                  506 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 200
                  Santa Monica, CA 90401
                  Tel: 310.394.5900
                  Fax: 310.394.9280
                  Email: leslie@lesliecohenlaw.com
                         jaime@lesliecohenlaw.co

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Wayne Tsang, manager.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/45D3LXA/Joshuaville_LLC__cacbke-20-19443__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's Three Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Yihao Chen                       Monies Loaned/      $6,500,000
51 Jinda Road, Qianhua Ind. Zone      Advanced
Xinqiao, Wenzhou China 325006
Tel: +86 138 5885 7870
Email: yihaochen09@163.com

2. Allen Matkins                      Services             $57,320
Attn: Mike Farrell
l865 S Figueroa St, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA, 90017
Mike Farrell
Tel: (213) 622-5555
Email: mfarrell@allenmatkins.com

3. March I, LLC and                    Pending                  $0
MarchLive3, LLC                      Arbitration
c/o Ernesto F. Aldover, Retz & Aldover
2550 Via Tejon, Ste. 3A
Palos Verdes Peninsula, CA, 90274
Ernesto Aldover
Tel: (424) 282-3467
Email: ernesto@arealestatelawfirm.com


KG IM LLC: Appointment of Mackinac as CRO Appropriate, Court Rules
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn granted in part and denied in part
the United States Trustee's Motion for Reconsideration of the
Stipulation and Order Appointing Chief Restructuring Officer and
Establishing Operating Protocol for the Debtors K.G. IM, LLC and
certain affiliated entities. Judge Glenn granted the Debtors'
Application for an Order to (I) Employ Mackinac Partners, LLC and
(II) Affirm Designation of Craig M. Boucher as Chief Restructuring
Officer and overruled the UST's objection. According to Judge
Glenn, the UST's request to vacate the stipulation and order is
denied because the UST failed to establish exceptional
circumstances or other grounds justifying relief. The Debtors' CRO
Retention Application pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 363(b) is
consistent with the procedures routinely followed in the district.

The Stipulation and Order, inter alia, appointed Mackinac as the
chief restructuring officer of the Debtors, with Mr. Craig Boucher
of Mackinac performing the duties of the CRO on behalf of Mackinac.
The Stipulation and Order vested in the CRO "all of the powers and
duties to operate the Debtors' business" and granted the CRO "sole
and exclusive power to exercise all of the management, voting
rights, consent rights and powers of each of the Debtors, without
regard to, or requirement of, any management, voting rights,
consent rights, consultation rights or powers of any person who has
any such rights or powers under any of the Debtors' Operating
Agreements . . . ." Each of the Debtors, Katzoff, Galligan, and
J.B. IM, solely in its capacity as manager of Debtor IMNY Hamptons,
"expressly consent[ed] to the appointment of the CRO and expressly
and irrevocably waive[d] any such management, voting rights,
consent rights, consultation rights or powers any of them may have
with respect to any of the Debtors . . . ."

On July 28, 2020, K.G. IM, LLC and certain affiliated entities
filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors are operating their business and
managing their properties as debtors-in-possession pursuant to
Bankruptcy Code sections 1107(a) and 1108. No trustee, examiner, or
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.

The Debtors own and operate certain Il Mulino restaurants -- one of
the country's premier Italian luxury dining brands. The Il Mulino
family of restaurants comprises sixteen locations across the United
States and Puerto Rico. These chapter 11 cases, however, have only
been commenced for seven Il Mulino locations. In addition to the
Restaurant Operator Debtors, several affiliated non-operating
entities are also debtors in these chapter 11 proceedings.

Debtor K.G. IM, LLC is the indirect parent of the Debtors. With the
exception of debtor IMNY Hamptons, LLC K.G. IM is the sole
"Manager" of the Debtors. J.B. IM, LLC is the "Manager" of IMNY
Hamptons. K.G. IM and J.B. IM are majority-owned by Gerald Katzoff
and Brian Galligan.

Katzoff and Galligan are "Co-Managers" of K.G. IM and J.B. IM. On
August 14, 2020, both Katzoff and Galligan executed the CRO
Stipulation agreeing to vest management authority with respect to
K.G. IM and, accordingly, K.G. IM's management authority over the
K.G. IM Managed Debtors to Mackinac Partners, LLC. Pursuant to the
CRO Stipulation, both Katzoff and Galligan also agreed to vest
management authority with respect to J.B. IM, solely as to Debtor
IMNY Hamptons, in the CRO.

On August 28, 2020, the UST filed the Reconsideration Motion asking
the Court to reconsider entry of the Stipulation and Order and
vacate same pursuant to Rules 59(e), 60(b)(1), and 60(b)(6) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The UST favors the appointment of
a chapter 11 trustee in these cases but the UST did not file a
motion for appointment of a trustee.

Among other reasons, the UST sought reconsideration on grounds that
the Stipulation and Order was entered without sufficient notice or
an opportunity to object. The UST asserted that the Court should
vacate the Stipulation and Order because it effectuates a change at
the managerial level of the Debtors' corporate governance structure
without complying with applicable state law and it effectively
creates a de facto chapter 11 trustee without any express
authorization under the Bankruptcy Code at a time where the
debtors' existing management has abrogated its fiduciary duty.

On Sept. 11, 2020, the UST filed its Objection to the CRO Retention
Application. The UST's Objection largely presented the same
arguments set forth in the Reconsideration Motion. Beyond that, the
UST argued that the proposed retention does not abide by Part I.D
of the J. Alix Protocol, which provides that "[p]ersons furnished .
. . for executive officer positions" shall be retained upon the
express approval of and be subject to the oversight of "an
independent Board of Directors whose members are performing their
duties and obligations as required under applicable law."

According to Judge Glenn, the UST has established that
reconsideration of entry of the Stipulation and Order is warranted.
The UST argued that proper notice and an opportunity to respond to
the CRO Stipulation was not provided to creditors and parties in
interest, including the UST, prior to entry of the Stipulation and
Order. Terms of the CRO Stipulation were first disclosed in the
Final Status Letter that was filed on August 13, 2020 at 9:05 p.m.
The Stipulation and Order was subsequently entered the next morning
on August 14, 2020 at 9:17 a.m. While the UST acknowledged
receiving notifications through ECF of the Joint Status Letters,
those filings did not contain the terms of the CRO Stipulation and
did not constitute adequate notice of the relief granted by the
Stipulation and Order. Accordingly, the Court granted the UST's
request to reconsider entry of the Stipulation and Order.

The Reconsideration Motion primarily relies on FRCP 60(b)(6) and
asserted that the Court should vacate the Stipulation and Order
based on the circumstances that led to its entry and the
extraordinary relief purportedly granted therein. The
"circumstances" the UST asserts is that Stipulation and Order
resulted in "no-one" managing the Debtors because they did not take
the appropriate steps under state law to appoint Mackinac as
manager contemporaneously with entry of the Stipulation and Order.
The "extraordinary relief" the UST asserted is that under the
Bankruptcy Code, the CRO, as an estate professional, cannot
exercise all of the duties of a debtor or debtor-in-possession. The
UST failed to meet its burden under FRCP 60(b)(6) to establish that
entry of the Stipulation and Order should be vacated as a matter of
law.

The CRO Retention Application on the other hand sought entry of an
order pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
authorizing the retention and employment of Mackinac and affirming
the designation of the CRO. The UST did not challenge the Debtors'
business judgment or the CRO's qualifications. The UST's Objection
largely presented the same arguments set forth in the
Reconsideration Motion with respect to the Debtors' state law
governance rights and scope of the CRO's duties under the
Bankruptcy Code. The Court emphasized that the CRO's appointment
(and retention) is a valid exercise of the Debtors' business
judgment, pursuant to applicable state law, and appropriate under
the Bankruptcy Code.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion is available at
https://bit.ly/3jg8qQg from Leagle.com.

                          About IL Mulino

Il Mulino owns and operates Italian restaurants throughout the
United States, including locations at 86 W. Third Street, New York,
New York and 37 E. 60th Street, New York New York.

K.G. IM, LLC, based in New York, NY, and its affiliates, including
IL Mulino USA, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Lead Case No. 20-11723) on July 29, 2020.  The Hon. Martin Glenn
presides over the case.

In the petition signed by Gerald Katzoff, manager, the Debtor was
estimated to have $50 million to $100 in assets and $10 million to
$50 million in liabilities.

ALSTON & BIRD LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.
TRAXI LLC, and DAVIS & GILBERT LLP, serve as special counsel.


LRGHEALTHCARE: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: LRGHealthcare
        80 Highland Street
        Laconia NH 03246

Business Description:     LRGHealthcare -- www.lrgh.org --
                          is a not-for-profit healthcare
                          charitable trust operating Lakes Region
                          General Hospital, Franklin Regional
                          Hospital, and numerous other affiliated
                          medical practices and service programs.

                          LRGH is a community based acute care
                          facility with a licensed bed capacity
                          of 137 beds, and FRH is a 25-bed
                          critical access hospital with an
                          additional 10-bed inpatient psychiatric
                          unit.  In 2002, Lakes Region Hospital
                          Association and Franklin Regional
                          Hospital Association merged, with the
                          merged entity renamed LRGHealthcare.
                          LRGHealthcare offers a wide range of
                          medical, surgical, specialty,
                          diagnostic, and therapeutic services,
                          wellness education, support groups, and
                          other community outreach services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 19, 2020

Court:                    United States Bankruptcy Court
                          District of New Hampshire

Case No.:                 20-10892

Judge:                    Hon. Bruce A. Harwood

Debtor's
Bankruptcy,
Reorganization,
and Outside
Corporate
Counsel:                  Morgan C. Nighan, Esq.
                          NIXON PEABODY LLP
                          53 State Street
                          Boston, MA 02019
                          Tel: (617) 345-1000
                          Fax: (603) 628-4040
                          Email: mnighan@nixonpeabody.com

                            - and -

                          Christopher M. Desiderio, Esq.
                          Christopher J. Fong, Esq.
                          NIXON PEABODY LLP
                          55 West 46th Street
                          New York, NY 10036-4120
                          Tel: (212) 940-3000
                          Fax: (212) 940-3111

Debtor's
Financial and
Restructuring
Advisor and               DELOITTE TRANSACTIONS AND BUSINESS
Valuation Expert:         ANALYTICS LLP

Debtor's
Investment
Banker and
Financial
Advisor:                  KAUFMAN HALL

Debtor's
Claims,
Noticing,
Solicitation and
Administrative
Agent:                    EPIQ CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC
                     https://dm.epiq11.com/case/lrghealthcare/info

Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

The petition was signed by Kevin W. Donovan, president and chief
executive officer.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/AOLAZRY/LRGHealthcare__nhbke-20-10892__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

List of Debtor's 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                           Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Keybank as Mortgagee/             Undersecured     Undetermined
U.S. Department of Housing             Liability
and Urban Development ("HUD")
as Insurer to 2015 Fixed Rate
Mortgage Note
8115 Preston Road
Suite 800
Dallas, TX 75225
Contact: Zach Kau,
Managing Director
Tel: 415-486-3422
Fax: 212-869-6418
Email: zach.kau@key.com

2. Pension Benefit                   Underfunded      Undetermined
Guaranty Corp                          Pension
Dept 77430                            Liability
PO Box 77000
Detroit, MI 48277-0430
Contact: Melissa T. Harris
General Counsel
Tel: 202-229-3019
Fax: 202-326-4138
Email: harris.melissa@pbgc.gov
efile@pbgc.gov

3. State of New Hampshire             Unsecured         $5,250,000
Department of Health and              Loan Grant
Human Services
129 Pleasant Street
Concord, NH 03301-3852
Contact: Heather Moquin
Chief Executive Officer
Tel: 603-271-9376
Fax: 603-271-2896
Email: businessoperations@
dhhs.nh.gov

4. Laconia Clinic                   Professional        $1,411,921
724 North Main Street                 Services
Laconia, NH 03246                 Agreement (PSA)
Contact: Andrea Chin,
Accounts Payable Supervisor
Tel: 603-524-5151
Fax: 603-524-3363
Email: customerservice@lrgh.org

5. Stryker Orthopaedics            Trade Payable-         $841,360
Box 93213                         Receipt Accrual
Chicago, IL 60673-3213
Contact: Stephanie Murphy, Sr.
Accounts Payable Coordinator
Tel: 269-385-2600
Fax: 269-385-1062
Email: stephanie.murphy@stryker.com

6. Eversource                      Trade Payable          $764,022
PO Box 650047
Dallas, TX 75265-0047
Contact: James Judge, CEO
Tel: 844-273-7760
Fax: 877-285-4448
Email: james.judge@eversource.com

7. Stryker                         Trade Payable          $510,549
22491 Network Place
Chicago, IL 60673
Contact: Stephanie Murphy, Sr.
Accounts Payable Coordinator
Tel: 269-385-2600
Fax: 269-385-1062
Email: stephanie.murphy@stryker.com

8. State of New Hampshire            Franklin             $442,207
Department of Health and             Regional-
Human Services - Division           Designated
of Community Based Care              Receiving
Systems                            Facility (DRF)
129 Pleasant Street                Startup Costs
Concord, NH 03301-3852
Contact: Heather Moquin,
Chief Executive Officer
Tel: 603-271-9376
Fax: 603-271-2896
Email: businessoperations@dhhs.nh.gov

9. Cardinal Health                 Trade Payable          $348,394
PO Box 13862
Newark, NJ 07188
Contact: Tina Meyer
Manager, Collections
Tel: 614-757-5000
Fax: 614-757-4131
Email: tina.meyers@cardinalhealth.com

10. ENT Associates                  Professional          $336,151
85 Spring Street                      Services
Laconia, NH 03246                  Agreement (PSA)
Contact: James Stark
President
Tel: 603-524-7402
Fax: 603-524-0945
Email: jstar@lrgh.org

11. Dell Financial Services LLC     Trade Payable         $292,003
PO Box 6549
Carol Stream, IL 60197
Fax: 877-214-3335

12. Dartmouth Hitchcock             Trade Payable         $238,538
One Medical Center Drive
Lebanon, NH 06756-0001
Contact: Edward J. Merrens
Chief Financial Officer
Tel: 603-650-8380
Fax: 603-727-7869
Email: edward.j.merrens@hitchcock.org

13. VVC Holding Corporation         Trade Payable         $237,458
PO Box 840952
Dallas, TX 75284-0952

14. Philips Healthcare              Trade Payable         $193,948
PO Box 100355
Atlanta, GA 30384-0355
Tel: 800-225-0230
Email: cashmgmt.inquiries@philips.com

15. Focusone Solutions LLC          Trade Payable         $180,006
PO Box 3037
Omaha, NE 68103-0037
Contact: Craig Wolf, President
Tel: 402-938-2040
Fax: 866-775-3446
Email: cwolf@focusonesolutions.com

16. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corp     Trade Payable         $179,189
PO Box 5198
New York, NY 10087-5198
Contact: Bennett S.
Murphy, Senior Vice
President, Investor Relations
Tel: 610-727-7000
Fax: 800-640-5221
Email: bmurphy@amerisoucebergen.com

17. Baker Newman & Noyes            Trade Payable         $175,000
PO Box 507
Portland, ME 04101
Tel: 207-879-2100
Fax: 207-774-1793

18. Martin Technical Services LLC   Trade Payable         $167,460
182 South St
Duxbury, MA 02332
Contact: Gerald Truesdale
Chief Revenue Officer
Email: gil@martechnical.com

19. B E Smith Interim Services LLC  Trade Payable         $163,995
PO Box 74007636
Chicago, IL 60674-7636

20. Zimmer                          Trade Payable         $130,045
PO Box 414666
Boston, MA 02241-4666
Tel: 800-348-9500
Email: contactus@zimmerbiomet.com

21. Siemens Healthcare              Trade Payable         $129,577
  
Diagnostics
PO Box 121102
Dallas, TX 75312-1102
Tel: 919-804-8152
Email: alesia.michaels@siemenshealthineers.com

22. Mako Surgical Corp              Trade Payable         $110,000
PO Box 935086
Atlanta, GA 31193-5086
Contact: Stephanie Murphy, Sr.
Accounts Payable Coordinator
Tel: 269-385-2600
Fax: 269-385-1062
Email: stephanie.murphy@stryker.com

23. Boston Scientific Corp          Trade Payable          $94,588
PO Box 786205
Philadelphia, PA 19178-6205
Contact: Mike Mahoney
Chairman and CEO
Tel: 508-683-4000

24. Genzyme Corporation             Trade Payable          $91,099
62665 Collections Cntr Dr
Chicago, IL 60693-0626

25. PSG Health Systems Solutions    Trade Payable          $87,247
PO Box 123651
Dallas, TX 75312-3651
Contact: Dee Jones, CFO
Tel: 972-244-8381
Email: djones@psgconsults.com

26. Osseus Fusion Systems LLC       Trade Payable          $83,531
1931 Greenville Ave Suite 200
Dallas, TX 75206
Contact: Robert Pace, President
Tel: 888-330-5960
Email: rpace@osseus.com

27. Sprague Operating Resources     Trade Payable          $82,430
LLC
PO Box 842985
Boston, MA 02284-2985
Contact: Dave, Glendon
Tel: 800-225-1560
Fax: 603-430-5317
Email: customercare@spragueenergy.com;
dglendon@spragueenergy.com

28. Siemens Medical                 Trade Payable          $79,838
Solutions USA
PO Box 120001 Dept 0733
Dallas, TX 75312-0733
Tel: 919-804-8152
Email: alesia.michaels@siemens
healthineers.com

29. Uptodate                        Trade Payable          $72,460
95 Sawyer Rd
Waltham, MA 02453-3471
Contact: Marie Dunell,
Senior Enterprise
Account Manager
Tel: 781-392-3856
Email: marie.dunell@wolterskluwer.com

30. Baxter                          Trade Payable          $66,139
PO Box 33037
Newark, NJ 07188-0037
Contact: Fred Ruda
Director of Finance
Tel: 888-229-0001



LUCKY TEETH PEDIATRIC: Judge Excused the Appointment of PCO
-----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Brenda Rhoades waived the appointment of a patient
care ombudsman in the Chapter 11 case of Lucky Teeth Pediatric
Dentistry PLLC.  In lieu thereof, the Debtor is required to comply
with the self-reporting requirements regarding any change in its
licensing and any complaints that would affect or impact the
Debtor's licensing and practice privileges.

             About Lucky Teeth Pediatric Dentistry

Lucky Teeth Pediatric Dentistry PLLC filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex.
Case No. 20-41794) on August 20, 2020, listing under $1 million in
both assets and liabilities. Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC
serves as the Debtor's counsel.

Davidson Troilo Ream & Garza, P.C. serves as counsel to Bank of
America.



MAINES PAPER: Pruitt Suit Shelved Pending Bankruptcy Proceedings
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Kristine G. Baker removed the case captioned
PATRINNA PRUITT, Plaintiff, v. MAINES PAPER & FOOD SERVICES —
TENNESSEE, INC., MICHEAL CLAYBOURNE, and DEMOND WATSON LIBERTY
MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY INTERVENOR, Defendants, Case No.
2:19-cv-00009-KGB (E.D. Ark.) from the Nov. 30, 2020 trial calendar
and stayed all proceedings in this case pending the bankruptcy
proceedings of Maines Paper & Food Services - Tennessee, Inc. in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.
The Court directed the parties to notify the Court in a written
filing when the automatic stay imposed by the Delaware Bankruptcy
Court is lifted.

On Jan. 25, 2019, plaintiff Patrinna Pruitt filed a complaint
against defendants Maines Paper & Food Services - Tennessee, Inc.
and John Doe No. 1, asserting state-law negligence claims based on
an alleged slip-and-fall incident that occurred on Feb. 16, 2016,
at a Wendy's restaurant in West Helena, Arkansas. On Nov. 1, 2019,
Ms. Pruitt filed an amended complaint adding individual defendants
Micheal Claybourne and Demond Watson. On Nov. 8, 2019, intervenor
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company filed its complaint in
intervention. The Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on
Dec. 27, 2019. On April 21, 2020, the Court stayed briefing on the
defendants' motion for summary judgment to allow Ms. Pruitt and
Liberty Mutual additional time to conduct discovery. On May 21,
2020, the parties filed a joint status report with the Court,
which, among other things, proposed a briefing schedule for the
defendants' motion for summary judgment.

On June 18, 2020, Maines Paper filed a notice of suggestion of
pendency of bankruptcy and automatic stay of proceedings. Pursuant
to 11 U.S.C. section 362(a)(1), the initiation of bankruptcy
proceedings by a debtor prohibits creditors and other parties from
commencing or continuing a judicial action against the debtor that
was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the
case under the Bankruptcy Code, or to recover a claim against the
Debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under the
Bankruptcy Code.

A copy of the Court's Order is available at https://bit.ly/3jeC6xw
from Leagle.com.

                  About Maines Paper & Food

Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. -- http://www.maines.net/-- is
an independent foodservice distributor. The Company distributes
meat, fruits, vegetables, dairies, beverages, and seafood. The
company's customers include restaurants, convenience stores, delis,
bars, pizzerias, educational institutions, healthcare facilities,
cruise lines, concessionaires, and camps.

Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc., based in Conklin, N.Y., and its
debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead
Case No. 20-11502) on June 10, 2020.

In the petition signed by CRO John C. DiDonato, Maines Paper was
estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets and $100
million to $500 million in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP, KLEHR
HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP, as attorneys; HURON CONSULTING
SERVICES LLC, as restructuring advisor; and ETZLER HENRICH &
ASSOCIATES LLC, as the financial advisor.  STRETTO is the claims
and noticing agent.


NEPHROS INC: Prices $5 Million Registered Direct Stock Offering
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nephros, Inc. reports the pricing of a registered direct offering
of 833,333 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $6.00
per share.  The offering is expected to close on or about Oct. 20,
2020, subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

Total gross proceeds from the offering are expected to be
approximately $5.0 million, before offering expenses.  Nephros
intends to use the net proceeds of the offering for working capital
and general corporate purposes.

The shares are being offered pursuant to an effective shelf
registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-234528) that was
previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
was declared effective on Dec. 6, 2019.  The shares may be offered
only by means of a prospectus.  Copies of the prospectus supplement
and accompanying prospectus related to the offering, when
available, may be obtained from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov or
directly from the Company.

B. Riley Securities, Inc. is acting as lead financial advisor to
Nephros for the offering.  Craig-Hallum Capital Group, Maxim Group
LLC and The Benchmark Company, LLC are also acting as financial
advisors to Nephros.

                       About Nephros Inc.

River Edge, N.J.-based Nephros, Inc., is a commercial stage medical
device company that develops and sells high performance liquid
purification filters.  Its filters, which are generally classified
as ultrafilters, are primarily used in hospitals for the prevention
of infection from water-borne pathogens, such as legionella and
pseudomonas, and in dialysis centers for the removal of biological
contaminants from water and bicarbonate concentrate.

Nephros reported a net loss of $3.18 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $3.33 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $16.65
million in total assets, $4.37 million in total liabilities, and
$12.27 million in ttoal stockholders' equity.


NEUMEDICINES INC: Dec. 10 Auction of All Assets Set
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Ernest M. Robles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California authorized Neumedicines, Inc.'s bidding
procedures in connection with the auction sale of substantially all
assets.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Oct. 14, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.

The counsel for the Debtor is authorized to hold and conduct the
Auction in accordance with the Bid Procedures.

The Debtor will serve the Order and the Notice of Bidding
Procedures, Auction and Sale Hearing re Debtor's Proposed Sale of
Assets on the Office of United States Trustee, all secured
creditors, the Debtor’s 20 largest unsecured creditors and the
four potential bidders who have expressed interest in the Sale on
Oct. 23, 2020.

Nov. 11, 2020, is the deadline for Debtor to file its Notice of
Designated Stalking Horse Bidder in Sale of the Debtor's Assets and
serve same.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Nov. 20, 2020

     b. Initial Bid: In addition to any debt that any Prospective
Bidder desires to assume and any other form of consideration any
Prospective Bidder desires to provide, a Prospective Bidder must
agree to pay cash to the Debtor’s estate of not less than $5
million.

     c. Deposit: $500,000 on Nov. 17, 2020

     d. Auction: The Auction will be held on Dec. 10, 2020 at 11:00
a.m., with the Sale Hearing to immediately follow.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Dec. 10, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.

     g. Closing: Nov. 30, 2020

     h. Expense Reimbursement: $150,000

     i. Break-up Fee: $175,000.  Payment of the Breakup Fee will be
made to the Stalking Horse Bidder within 10 days following the
entry of a final, non-appealable order approving the sale of the
Purchased Assets to any other bidder.  

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rules 6004
and 7062 or otherwise, the terms and conditions of the Bid
Procedures Order will be immediately effective and enforceable upon
its entry, the 14-day stay provisions are waived, and no automatic
stay of execution will apply to the Bid Procedures Order.

                     About Neumedicines Inc.

Neumedicines, Inc. is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company in
Arcadia, Calif., which is engaged in the research and development
of HemaMax, recombinant human interleukin 12 (rHuIL-12), for the
treatment of cancer in combination with standard of care (SOC,
radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy) and Hematopoietic
Syndrome of Acute Radiation Syndrome (HSARS) as a monotherapy.
Visit https://www.neumedicines.com/ for more information.

Neumedicines filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
20-16475) on July 17, 2020.  In the petition signed by Timothy
Gallaher, president, Debtor was estimated to have $100,000 to
$500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
Judge Ernest M. Robles presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped Weintraub & Seth, APC as its bankruptcy counsel
and Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP as its special
counsel.


OCULAR THERAPEUTIX: Prices Public Offering of Common Stock
----------------------------------------------------------
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. reports the pricing of an underwritten
public offering of 7,180,000 shares of its common stock at a public
offering price of $9.75 per share for gross proceeds of
approximately $70 million, before deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and other offering expenses payable by the Company.
In addition, the Company has granted the underwriters of the
offering a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 1,077,000
shares in the public offering on the same terms and conditions.
All of the shares in the offering are to be sold by the Company.
The offering was expected to close on or about Oct. 16, 2020,
subject to the satisfaction of customary closing conditions.

Jefferies LLC and Piper Sandler & Co. are acting as joint
book-running managers for the offering.  Raymond James &
Associates, Inc. and JMP Securities LLC are acting as co-managers
for the offering.

The offering is being made pursuant to a shelf registration
statement on Form S-3 that was previously filed with and declared
effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  The
offering is made only by means of a prospectus supplement and the
accompanying prospectus that form a part of the registration
statement.  Before investing in the offering, interested parties
should read the prospectus supplement and the accompanying
prospectus for the offering and the other documents the Company has
filed with the SEC, which are incorporated by reference in the
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus for the
offering and which provide more complete information about the
Company and the offering.  Electronic copies of the preliminary
prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus for the
offering are available on the website of the SEC at www.sec.gov,
and the final prospectus supplement relating to the offering will
be filed with the SEC.  Copies of the preliminary prospectus
supplement, the final prospectus supplement, when available, and
the accompanying prospectus relating to this offering may also be
obtained by contacting Jefferies LLC, Attention: Equity Syndicate
Prospectus Department, 520 Madison Avenue, 2nd Floor, NY 10022, by
telephone: (877) 821-7388, or by email:
Prospectus_Department@Jefferies.com or Piper Sandler & Co.,
Attention: Prospectus Department, 800 Nicollet Mall, J12S03,
Minneapolis, MN 55402, by telephone: (800) 747-3924, or by email:
prospectus@psc.com.

                     About Ocular Therapeutix

Headquartered in Bedford, MA, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. --
http://www.ocutx.com/-- is a biopharmaceutical company focused on
the formulation, development, and commercialization of innovative
therapies for diseases and conditions of the eye using its
proprietary bioresorbable hydrogel-based formulation technology.
Ocular Therapeutix's first commercial drug product, DEXTENZA, is
FDA-approved for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain
following ophthalmic surgery.

Ocular Therapeutix recorded a net loss of $86.37 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $59.97 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of June 30, 2020, the Company
had $107.26 million in total assets, $101.92 million in total
liabilities, and $5.34 million in total stockholders' equity.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, in Boston, Massachusetts, the Company's
auditor since 2008, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated March 12, 2020, citing that the Company has incurred
losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


OUTDOOR BY DESIGN: Seeks Nov. 28 Plan Exclusivity Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------
Outdoor by Design, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, to extend the Debtor's
exclusive period to file a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement until November 28, 2020.

The Debtor has ceased manufacturing operations and concluded that
it cannot obtain the appropriate financing to successfully
reorganize. Accordingly, the Debtor has determined that the best
way to maximize value for the benefit of its creditors and
interested parties is a prompt and orderly wind-down of business
and liquidation of its assets.

Currently, the Debtor is in the process of selling its assets
through a proposed sale that is expected to take through October
30, 2020, after which a further period of time will be needed for
successful bidders to remove the assets purchased from the leased
property.

"After the sale process is completed, we will be in the position to
make the final decision in filing a plan or to take other
appropriate action, and will not cause unreasonable delay or
prejudice to other creditors and parties-in-interest," the Debtor
said.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion to Extend is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://bit.ly/2FdWKQc at no extra charge.

                      About Outdoor By Design

Outdoor By Design, LLC, a manufacturer of outdoor furnishings,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 20-04253) on June 1, 2020.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor disclosed $3,090,093 in assets and $10,543,170
in liabilities.  

The assets include (i) Type 1 Assets being sold consist of the Wash
Tank, 80 x 100 ft. Oven, 50x 60 ft. Oven, Paint Booth, Torrit Paint
Collection System, Torrit Dust Collector, and CNC machine; and (ii)
Sun 3D Printer.

Judge Caryl E. Delano oversees the Debtor's case. The Debtor has
tapped the Law Offices of Benjamin Martin as its legal counsel.



PAI HOLDCO: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to PAI
Holdco Inc. (Parts Authority) and its 'B' issue-level rating and
'3' recovery rating to the proposed $600 million first lien term
loan. The company's proposed $125 million asset-based lending (ABL)
facility and $200 million second-lien term loan are unrated.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that the company's
increasing EBITDA base, due to acquisitions and leveraging of
expenses on expanding sales, will lead to leverage declining from
initially very high levels of around 7x, to below 6x in fiscal
2021.

The rating reflects S&P's expectation that Parts Authority will
materially reduce leverage in 2021.

The company's pro forma capital structure will comprise a $125
million ABL facility, a $600 million first-lien term loan, and a
$200 million second-lien term. Parts Authority's total funded debt
as of the close of the transaction will be about $800 million,
which represents a material increase in funded debt relative to
fiscal-year 2019 levels of about $450 million. Therefore, S&P
expects the company's initial post-transaction S&P-adjusted debt to
EBITDA to be high at about 7x. However, S&P forecasts that the
expansion of EBITDA will improve leverage by slightly more than one
turn, to below 6x, by the end of 2021. Specifically, S&P expects
Parts Authority's earnings to improve on contributions from
acquisitions completed in 2020, the leveraging of fixed-costs on
increasing overall sales, and a slight uptick in gross margins,
which were depressed during the first half of the year due to the
coronavirus pandemic. Based on these expectations, the rating
agency forecasts the company's S&P-adjusted EBITDA margins will
improve to between 11.0% and 11.5% by 2021 from about 9.0% in
2019.

Parts Authority has a small market position in the automotive
aftermarket distribution industry, which S&P views as highly
competitive.

The company has expanded market presence through acquisitions over
the last several years (nearly doubling revenue to $1.2 billion in
2019 from $650 million in 2017). However, its market share in the
$70 billion wholesale parts aftermarket remains less than 2%. S&P
believes the barriers to entry in this industry are low, which
could enable competitors to encroach upon its market position. In
addition, S&P does not see Parts Authority as being significantly
integrated into customers' operations, which lowers the potential
switching costs. While the three largest U.S. aftermarket auto
parts big box retailers (Advance Auto Parts Inc., Autozone Inc.,
and O'Reilly Automotive Inc.) are all customers of Parts Authority,
S&P also sees them as potential competitors in the broader auto
parts aftermarket given their significantly greater scale and
financial resources.

Parts Authority has been relatively successful in its niche due to
technology investments, which enable the fast delivery and
fulfillment of e-commerce retailer orders.

The company's infrastructure (primarily locations it added through
acquisitions) and technology investments allow it to deliver 80% of
orders from stores within 30 minutes and 90% within one hour. This
provides somewhat of a strategic advantage over competitors because
auto parts customers often require fast delivery of their orders to
complete their installation services in a timely manner. Parts
Authority also has a greater depth and breadth of products (over
500,000 stock-keeping units [SKUs]) than the big box retailers,
which allows it to capture the demand installers (such as local
repair shops, chain service centers, and auto dealerships) and
jobbers (independent local distributors buying from warehouse
distributors) that require specific or unique aftermarket parts,
which may be unavailable at retailers or other distributors. S&P
also notes that, due to its position as a distributor, Parts
Authority is dependent on the performance of its customer base to
support the expansion of sales, though this is somewhat offset by
minimal customer concentration.

The company generates roughly 60% and 10% of its revenue from its
sales to installer and jobber customers, respectively (as of fiscal
year 2019), and derives the remainder by fulfilling orders for
e-commerce retailers. Through these e-commerce retailers, Parts
Authority is moderately exposed to do-it-yourself customers. In
addition, S&P believes there are good tailwinds supporting
e-commerce aftermarket parts sales because auto parts consumers are
increasingly shifting their purchasing online. In S&P's view, this
trend has been modestly accelerated by the pandemic because
consumers shifted toward do-it-yourself repairs amid the height of
the pandemic when social distancing mandates were at their
strictest. Therefore, S&P expects growth in sales to e-commerce
customers to outpace those to installer and jobber customers over
the next several years.

S&P expects the company's aggressive acquisition strategy will
contribute to its revenue and EBITDA growth, though it believes
this strategy also entails execution risks that could affect
performance.

Since 2018 Parts Authority has completed 4-5 acquisitions annually,
which is an important aspect of the company's strategy that S&P
expects to continue. In addition, S&P believes there are still a
significant number of independent players in the aftermarket
distribution space across the U.S. The company has a good track
record of integrating acquisitions and improving profitability by
leveraging existing infrastructure and technology to realize
synergies. However, a rapid acquisition strategy does carry
execution risk, particularly if acquired locations do not perform
as anticipated while the acquisition-related integration and
transaction charges weigh on EBITDA. S&P forecasts Parts Authority
will largely fund acquisitions with internally generated cash,
though the rating agency notes that this will reduce the amount
available for debt pay down or other uses. The company spent
between $30 million and $40 million on acquisitions in both 2019
and 2020.

Part Authority's performance has been decent through the pandemic,
though some uncertainty remains for the back half of 2020 and into
2021.

The company's total revenue expanded by 3.8% for the second quarter
due to shrinking sales at installer and jobber customers with a
greater than 30% increase in its e-commerce revenue. In S&P's view,
consumers increasingly shifted their purchases online during the
quarter to comply with social-distancing mandates and completed
their own auto repairs instead of taking their vehicles to auto
repair shops. However, S&P expects the outsized boost to its
e-commerce sales in the second, and likely third, quarter will be
largely temporary and abate in the fourth quarter of 2020. S&P does
expect Parts Authority's e-commerce sales to continue to expand at
a faster rate than the rest of its business.

For 2021, S&P anticipates the pace of the company's revenue growth
will return to more normalized levels and forecast a revenue
expansion in the low double-digit percent range (which includes
benefits from acquisitions completed in 2020 and anticipated in
2021). While the company's performance in the first half of the
year demonstrated some resiliency in aftermarket auto parts
purchasing amid the pandemic, S&P believes there remains
uncertainty around the path of the pandemic and how consumers will
respond to potential increases in COVID-19 cases. To the extent
that the number of miles driven drops substantially, which S&P
believes could occur if stay-at-home mandates are re-imposed or the
economic recovery falters significantly, the rating agency
anticipates that it would weaken Parts Authority's performance.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that Parts Authority will
continue to execute on the integration of acquisitions and leverage
its cost structure, which will support continued EBITDA expansion
and a reduction in its leverage to below 6x by fiscal year 2021,"
S&P said.

"We forecast that its earnings growth will lead to sufficient free
operating cash flow (FOCF), which will prevent the company from
significantly relying on revolver borrowings to fund acquisitions
or capital expenditure," the rating agency said.

S&P could lower its rating on Parts Authority if:

-- Adjusted debt to EBITDA does not decline in line with S&P's
expectations and it expects that leverage will be sustained above
6x; or

-- Heightened competition from national or regional aftermarket
auto-parts competitors reduces the company's niche position,
leading to top-line pressures and margin compression; or

-- The company faces unforeseen issues with integrating
acquisitions, leading to poor leveraging of the cost structure and
a material decline in margins relative to S&P's forecast.

While unlikely in the near term, S&P could raise its rating on
Parts Authority if:

-- S&P believes that leverage will decline to, and remain below,
5x on continued success in integrating its acquisition and good
organic growth; and

-- The company adopts a more-conservative financial policy that
lead us to believe the risk of a leveraging event is minimal,
likely requiring a material ownership reduction by the financial
sponsors; and

-- Parts Authority expands its market presence substantially,
leading us to favorably reassess S&P's view of its competitive
positioning.


PAPER STORE: Jan. 19-20 Hearings on Cure Amount Disputes
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher J. Panos of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts will convene evidentiary hearings on Jan.
19 and 20, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. to consider the adequate assurance
and individual cure amount disputes relating to the approved sale
by The Paper Store, LLC and TPS Holdings, LLC of substantially all
assets to TPS Holdings, LLC.

As a result of the Auction, the Buyer modified and improved its
original Purchase Agreement as follows:  

     (a) the portion of the consideration constituting the cash
purchase price was increased from $17.5 million to $22 million;  

     (b) the Purchased Assets were broadened to include the amounts
in the depositary accounts of the Debtors as of the Closing Date,
provided that the Purchased Assets will not include (x) $500,000
that will be reserved from such accounts by the Debtors to pay a
dividend to unsecured creditors in full and final settlement of the
limited objection of the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee
("Unsecured Creditors' Payment"), and (y) budgeted amounts in the
categories set forth in the cash collateral budget approved in the
case;  

     (c) John Anderson, Thomas Anderson, James Anderson, Robert
Anderson, Laura Carolan, and Margaret Lavoie, together with any
other members of the Anderson Family and their spouses and
offspring, agreed to waive any and all distributions on their
claims, and on any claims of any nature of Founder Investerco,
Inc., against the Debtors;  

     (d) the Buyer agreed to waive the potential downward
adjustment to the purchase price that might have arisen as a result
of the "Inventory Adjustment";

     (e) the $22 million cash purchase price will be indefeasibly
and irrevocably paid to the Administrative Agent in full
satisfaction of all claims, including deficiency claims, of the
Administrative Agent or the Prepetition Secured Lenders arising
under the Prepetition Credit Agreement, and the Administrative
Agent will release its liens and security interests in any assets
of the bankruptcy estates; and

     (f) the Administrative Agent, on behalf of itself and the
Prepetition Secured Lenders, the Buyer, and the Debtors will enter
into a mutual release of claims, excluding any claims arising under
the Purchase Agreement.

A prehearing video conference is set for Jan. 12, 2021 at 10:00
a.m.

The Buyer's counsel is directed to file a Status Report on all
unresolved claims on Dec. 15, 2020.  Any responses to the Report
will by filed by Dec. 22, 2020.  

Further orders will enter regarding the conduct of the prehearing
conference and evidentiary hearing after the filing of the Status
Report.

                      About The Paper Store
   
The Paper Store, LLC -- http://www.thepaperstore.com/-- is a
family owned and operated specialty gift retailer, with 86 stores
in seven states and an e-commerce business.  The retail locations
feature merchandise comprising fashion, accessories, spa, home
decor, stationery, jewelry, sports and more, from well-regarded
brands such as Vera Bradley, Lilly Pulitzer, Godiva, 47 Brands,
Alex and Ani, Life is Good, Vineyard Vines, and Sugarfina.  The
Debtors are a proud Hallmark greeting cards partner.

The Paper Store, LLC (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 20-40743), as the
Lead Debtor, and its affiliate TPS Holdings, LLC (Bankr. D. Mass.
Case No. 20-40745) sought Chapter 11 protection on July 14, 2020.

In the petitions signed by CRO Don Van der Wiel, the Paper Store
was estimated to have assets in the range of $10 million to $50
million, and $50 million to $100 million in debt.

Judge Christopher J. Panos is assigned to the case.

The Debtors tapped Paul J. Ricotta, Esq., Kevin J. Walsh, Esq., and
Timothy J. McKeon, Esq., at Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and
Popeo, P.C. as counsel.

G2 Capital Advisors serves as the Debtors' Restructuring Advisor,
SSG Capital Advisors as their Investment Banker, and Verdolno &
Lowet, P.C. as their Accountant, and Donlin, Recano & Co., Inc., as
their claims & noticing agent.


PARKER'S QUALITY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Parker's Quality Wood Products, LLC.
  
               About Parker's Quality Wood Products

Parker's Quality Wood Products, LLC sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Texas Case No. 20-10961) on
Aug. 27, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of the same
range.  Judge H. Christopher Mott oversees the case.  Herbert C.
Shelton, II, Esq., at Hajjar Peters LLP, serves as Debtor' s legal
counsel.


PAUL OLIVA PARADIS: Nov. 9 Hearing on $460K Nashville Property Sale
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Paul Sala of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for District of
Arizona will convene an expedited telephonic hearing on Nov. 9,
2020 at 11:00 a.m. (877-402-9757, access code 4376956) to consider
Paul Oliva Paradis' sale of the condominium unit located at 1212
Laurel Street, Unit 2211, Nashville, Tennessee to Joseph Gordon for
$459,900, cash, pursuant to their Purchase and Sale Agreement.

The Objection Deadline is Oct. 30, 2020.

The Purchase Price is payable in cash at closing including a $4,000
initial earnest money deposit.  The Purchase Contract also requires
the Debtor to pay up to $10,000 towards the Buyer's closing costs,
pre-paids, points, HOA and admin fees, non-allowable fees, and
other costs paid outside of closing.  The closing date is Nov. 19,
2020.  The sale transaction is subject to a financing contingency
and the Buyer has been pre-approved for such financing.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Property free and clear of all
liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances with ail liens attaching
to sale proceeds including, without limitation, the following:

     a. The claim of Ameris Bank equal to $256,395 as of the
Petition Date secured by the lien of a Deed of Trust recorded Feb.
3, 2017 as Instrument No. 20170203-0011984 official records of
Davidson County, Tennessee.

     b. A lien for any and all unpaid all real estate taxes,
condominium fees and/or homeowners' association assessments.

     c. The leasehold interest of Chris Jarratt.

The Debtor proposes to pay all such liens in full from the Purchase
Price at closing together with the Debtor's share of ail closing
costs and escrow fees and the real estate commission owed to Agent.
Jarratt's lease of the Property expired Sept. 30, 2020.  As such,
Jarrett's right of occupancy to the Property is currently based on
a month to month tenancy.  Jarrett has been given notice to vacate
the Property.

Pursuant to his employment, the Agent, Prentiss Holt of Benchmark
Realty, is entitled to a commission equal to 6% of the purchase
price.  In the case, the commission to be paid to Agent equals
$27,570.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y5c3supy from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.


Paul Oliva Paradis sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Ariz.
Case No. 20-06724) on June 3, 2020.  The Debtor tapped Allan D.
Newdelman, Esq., at Allan D Newdelman P.C., as counsel.


PELICAN REAL ESTATE: $11.3K Sale of Project Wells Interests Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Cynthia C. Jackson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida authorized Maria M. Yip, Liquidating
Trustee of the Smart Money Liquidating Trust and its
debtor-affiliates, to sell the funds invested by one or more of the
Debtors with D&S Energy Corp. in exchange for a working interest in
five oil and gas wells in McKean County, Pennsylvania, WT 5574,
sites 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, to Bald Hill Oil for $11,250.

The terms and conditions of the Sale and the Purchase Agreement are
ratified, adopted, and approved.  

The sale is on an "as is, where is" basis without any
representations or warranties, and free and clear of any and all
claims, liens, interests, and encumbrances (including, without
limitation, the Overriding Interests) except for the Landowner
Interests.

The Liquidating Trustee and the Purchaser are authorized to
immediately implement the Sale.  The automatic stay is modified to
permit the Liquidating Trustee and the Purchaser to take whatever
actions may be reasonably necessary to effectuate the Sale.

The automatic 14-day stay of the Order is waived under Rule 6004 of
the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.  

Attorney Michael D. Seese is directed to serve a copy of the Order
on all interested parties who are non-CM/ECF users and file a proof
of service within three days of entry of the Order.  

                  About Pelican Real Estate

Pelican Real Estate, LLC, and its eight affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Lead Case No. 16-03817) on June 8, 2016.  In the petition
signed by Jared Crapson, president of SMFG, Inc., manager of
Pelican Management Company, LLC, Pelican Real Estate estimated
under $50,000 in both assets and debt.

The Debtors tapped Elizabeth A. Green, Esq., at Baker & Hostetler
LLP, as bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors hired Bill Maloney
Consulting as their financial advisor; Hammer Herzog and Associates
P.A. as their accountant; and Pino Nicholson PLLC as their special
counsel.

Turnkey Investment Fund LLC, an affiliate of Pelican Real Estate
LLC, hired Dance Bigelow Sharp & Co. as accountant.

Guy Gebhardt, acting U.S. trustee for Region 21, on July 27, 2016,
formed an official committee of unsecured creditors for Pelican
Real Estate LLC's affiliates, Smart Money Secured Income Fund LLC
and Accelerated Asset Group LLC.

Maria Yip was appointed examiner in the case.  She hired
GrayRobinson, P.A., as her lead counsel; Fikso Kretschmer Smith
Dixon Ormseth PS as special counsel; and Schweet Linde & Coulson,
PLLC, as special foreclosure counsel.

                          *     *     *

On Feb. 15, 2017, the Court entered an order confirming the
Debtors' Second Amended Plan of Liquidation.  The Plan became
effective on March 2, 2017, at which time the Smart Money
Liquidating Trust came into existence and Ms. Yip was named the
liquidating trustee.


PIUS STREET ASSOCIATES: Court Directs Appointment of Ch 11 Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Gregory L. Taddonio issued an order directing the
U.S. Trustee to immediately appoint a chapter 11 trustee for Pius
Street Associates, LP.

Angel Arms Homeowner's Association and Mark Willson previously
sought conversion of the Debtor's case to chapter 7 or, in the
alternative, the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee to replace
management. They contend that the Debtor has failed to maintain
insurance on its assets, accrued substantial unpaid postpetition
expenses, fraudulently transferred units to the ex-wife and
daughters of Thomas Tripoli, the Debtor's principal, for less than
fair market value, and thwarted legitimate inquiries from
prospective buyers, and otherwise made no progress to sell its
remaining assets.

The Court finds that the Debtor has made no discernible progress to
consummate a sale during the 18 months the case has been pending.
In fact, the Debtor squandered the first seven months of the case
by failing to actively engage a real estate broker, and when it
did, the broker was authorized to sell only two of the Debtor's
seven units.

Since the Debtor has taken no independent action to retain a new
broker nor shown any sense of urgency in procuring a timely sale,
the Court finds it necessary to appoint a trustee to take charge of
the sale process and to retain experienced brokers with the
skillset and motivation necessary to promptly generate sale
proceeds for the bankruptcy estate.

A copy of the Court's Order dated October 14, 2020 is available at
PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/yxfozlga at no extra
charge.

              About Pius Street Associates

Pius Street Associates, LP is a privately held company engaged in
activities related to real estate.  

Pius Street Associates sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-21560) on April 17,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.

The case has been assigned to Judge Gregory L. Taddonio.  Robert O
Lampl Law Office is the Debtor's legal counsel.



PLATINUM GROUP: Closes Private Placement with Largest Shareholder
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. reports closing of the Company's
previously announced non-brokered private placement of common
shares at price of US$2.18 each.  An aggregate of 1,146,790 common
shares were subscribed for and issued resulting in gross proceeds
to the Company of US$2,500,002.20 to existing major beneficial
shareholder, Hosken Consolidated Investments Limited through its
subsidiary Deepkloof Limited.  Closing of the Private Placement
allows HCI to maintain a greater than 31% interest in the Company.

The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the Private
Placement for its share of pre-development costs on the Waterberg
Project in South Africa, partial debt repayment and general
corporate and working capital purposes.  Closing of the Private
Placement is subject to customary closing conditions, including
stock exchange approvals.

Securities purchased pursuant to the Private Placement may not be
traded for a period of four months plus one day from the closing of
the Private Placement.  The securities have not been, and will not
be, registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and may not be offered or sold within the United States or
to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons absent
registration or an applicable exemption from the registration
requirements of such Act.

                    About Platinum Group Metals

Headquartered in British Columbia, Canada, Platinum Group Metals
Ltd. -- http://www.platinumgroupmetals.net/-- is a platinum and
palladium focused exploration, development and operating company
conducting work primarily on mineral properties it has staked or
acquired by way of option agreements or applications in the
Republic of South Africa and in Canada.  The Company's sole
material mineral property is the Waterberg Project.  The Company
continues to evaluate exploration opportunities both on currently
owned properties and on new prospects.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, in Vancouver, Canada, the Company's
auditor since 2007, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Nov. 25, 2019, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has significant amounts of
debt payable without any current source of operating income.  The
Company also has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Platinum Group reported a net loss of $16.77 million for the year
ended Aug. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $41.02 million for
the year ended Aug. 31, 2018.  As of Aug. 31, 2019, Platinum Group
had $43.66 million in total assets, $44.82 million in total
liabilities, and a total shareholders' deficit of $1.16 million.


POSEIDON INVESTMENT: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR; Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'B' issuer credit rating to Poseidon
Investment Intermediate L.P. (dba Pretium Packaging LLC). At the
same time, S&P assigned its 'B' issue-level and '3' recovery
ratings to the company's proposed $530 million first-lien term loan
due 2027. S&P also assigned its 'CCC+' issue-level and '6' recovery
ratings to the company's proposed $170 million second-lien term
loan due 2028.

"The stable outlook on Poseidon reflects our expectation for
improving operating performance as the company benefits from demand
tailwinds related to the COVID-19 pandemic and earnings growth from
previous strategic initiatives," S&P said.

Following years of investment in external growth and internal
operating initiatives, S&P believes the company's cash generation
will improve due to earnings growth and reduced transaction costs.
In fiscal 2021 ending Sept. 30, S&P forecasts reported free
operating cash flow (FOCF) will turn positive, after years of cash
flow deficits constrained by transaction and restructuring costs
and higher capital expenditures (capex). In the last two fiscal
years, the company completed the acquisitions of Cox Container,
Olcott Plastics, and Starplex Scientific. Together with the
acquisition of CBM in fiscal 2016 and Patrick Products in fiscal
2017, Pretium has diversified its end markets, expanded its
footprint within North America, and increased its size and scale.
However, despite this recent growth, S&P continues to view
Pretium's geographically concentrated revenue base as relatively
small and its product focus limited to rigid plastic packaging
solutions.

Concurrently over the last two fiscal years, the company
implemented various strategic initiatives to improve operating
efficiency and reduce its costs including investments in network
optimization, automation, an integrated warehouse management
system, utilization of operating leverage, and new product
introductions. Although increased capex depressed cash flow in
fiscal 2019 and 2020, S&P believes these investments will support
higher earnings in the current fiscal year. Also, in fiscal 2020,
Pretium was sold to Clearlake Capital from its previous private
equity owner Genstar Capital, which resulted in significant
financing and legal costs. In fiscal 2021, the rating agency
projects lower transaction costs and some EBITDA growth will lead
to S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins improving to the
low-20% area. S&P believes higher earnings and tapering capex will
result in reported FOCF of $20 million-$30 million.

S&P expects leverage will remain high over the next 12 months.
Following the proposed transaction, Poseidon's capital structure
will consist of a $60 million asset-based lending (ABL) facility
(unrated), $530 million first-lien term loan, and $170 million
second-lien term loan. It intends to use the proceeds from the
proposed transaction to refinance its existing capital structure
and fund a shareholder distribution to its financial sponsor,
Clearlake Capital. Furthermore, the company's growth was
historically predicated on its acquisition strategy, which was
regularly funded through incremental debt. Although S&P anticipates
Clearlake Capital will focus on organic growth opportunities and
improving leverage in the near term, in its view, financial
sponsors have a tendency to institute aggressive financial
strategies, including the use of debt to maximize shareholder
returns. As such, S&P expects Poseidon's debt to EBITDA will remain
at 6x-7x over the next 12-24 months.

S&P believes Pretium is well suited to capitalize on shifting
consumer preferences and behavioral changes given its leading
position in niche applications within the North American plastic
packaging industry. For the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2020, sales
increased 18.9% to $473 million driven by contributions from recent
acquisitions and volume growth across its food and specialty
beverage and household and commercial chemical end markets. Pro
forma for all acquisitions, sales increased about 3.7% in fiscal
2020. At the height of the coronavirus pandemic, approximately 90%
of the U.S. population was under stay-at-home orders and as a
result of these containment measures, at-home consumption increased
significantly. When combined with the impact of pantry loading, it
is estimated that sales for packaged food, household products, and
personal care items increased double- to triple-digit percentages
in March. Although the demand impact from pantry loading was
temporary and is likely to normalize, other consumer trends related
to the pandemic such as an increased focus on health and hygiene
and greater purchasing through e-commerce channels are likely to
continue. Additionally, Pretium generates a significant portion of
its sales from private label brands, which in an economic downturn
could experience increased demand as consumers become more
sensitive to price. Pretium targets customers and products
requiring small- to medium-size annual production volumes, with
approximately 85% of its sales from customers with less than 10
million units per annum. The company competes with both smaller
regional competitors and larger, though less agile, competitors.
Its product innovation, automation expertise, customized packaging
solutions, and national scale provide a competitive advantage over
small regional competitors; while its differentiated packaging
solutions and short changeover times appeal to lower volume
customers who may be underserved by Pretium's larger competitors."

Although plastic packaging has come under scrutiny given an
increased focus on sustainability, the coronavirus has somewhat
disrupted accelerating consumer and corporate sustainability
trends. S&P expects a reversal of these sustainability headwinds as
economic conditions recover and believe Pretium is well positioned
given its focused efforts on sustainable packaging. Pretium has
reduced its single-use packaging to less than 2% of revenue and it
offers product lines with up to 100% post-consumer recycled (PCR)
material content, making it an attractive option for
environmentally focused customers. In addition to the common
benefits of plastic packaging, Pretium's packaging solutions offer
greater recyclability and weight benefits, limiting the
substitution risk from alternative materials.

Material margin expansion due to improved operating efficiency and
favorable commodity costs supports S&P's forecast for strong profit
margins over the next 12 months. In fiscal 2020, Poseidon's
material margin climbed to a five-year high at 64.8% driven by
volume growth, improvements in resin purchasing through scale, and
high throughput in operations. In fiscal 2021, S&P anticipates
resin costs will remain low and Pretium will sustain its high
material margins. The majority of the company's total cost is
variable, mostly coming from material costs, which consist
primarily of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), high-density
polyethylene (HDPE), and polypropylene (PP) resins sourced from
various resin producers and include labels, dyes, and packaging
materials. Higher material margins offset wage inflation and other
overhead cost increases. Pretium hedges its exposure to movements
in commodity resins by adopting mechanisms that pass-through
published index moves to its customers on a material weight basis
on a monthly or quarterly average basis.

"The stable outlook on Poseidon reflects our expectation for
improving operating performance as the company benefits from demand
tailwinds related to the COVID-19 pandemic and earnings growth from
previous strategic initiatives. We forecast S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted debt to EBITDA, although elevated near 7x in
fiscal 2020, will decline to the mid-6x area by the end of fiscal
2021," the rating agency said.

S&P could lower its rating if:

-- Weaker-than-expected operating performance results in leverage
sustained above 7x. This could occur if the company is unable to
recognize savings from its previously implemented initiatives or
pricing and procurement actions, resulting in profitability and
adjusted EBITDA margins below S&P's current forecast; or

-- The company pursues further debt-funded acquisitions,
prioritizing external growth over debt repayment.

Although unlikely over the next 12 months, S&P could raise its
rating if:

-- The company demonstrates a commitment to deleveraging following
the refinancing of its existing capital structure and shareholder
distribution, using its positive cash flow generation to repay debt
and sustain debt to EBITDA below 5x.


PUT R UP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
Put R' Up, Inc., according to court dockets.
    
                       About Put R' Up Inc.
  
Put R' Up, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 20-50116) on Sept. 11,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $500,001 and $1
million.  Judge Karen K. Specie oversees the case.  Bruner Wright,
P.A. serves as the Debtor's legal counsel.


ROBERT J. MOCKOVIAK: Fortunatos Buying Princeton Property for $1.7M
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert J. Mockoviak and Sandra H. Mockoviak ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to authorize the sale of
their non-homestead real property located at 27 Grasmere Way,
Princeton, New Jersey to Stephen J. Fortunato and Helen B.
Fortunato for $1.695 million.

On May 1, 2020, the Mockoviaks filed their initial schedules
listing an ownership interest in Property, legally described more
particularly in Exhibit A-1.

Since the Court's entry of the Order approving as the Real Estate
Agent, Alison Covello and BHH Fox & Roach Princeton RE have
efficiently and expeditiously marketed the Property to potential
buyers within New Jersey.  The Real Estate Agent has shown the
Property to multiple interested purchasers and is in receipt of an
offer for the purchase of the Property in the amount of $1.695
million from the Buyers.  Their offer represents the highest and
best offer that the Real Estate Agent has received and Real Estate
Agent believes, based on her extensive professional experience
selling real property in New Jersey, that the offer is well in line
with current market prices for other similarly situated real
properties in the area.

The Mockoviaks, Real Estate Agent, and the Buyers have agreed to
the terms contained pursuant to a Real Estate Sales Contract and an
Amendment to Contract Agreement for the sale and purchase of the
Property.

The Contract's primary and material terms are:

     (i) The purchase price is $1.695 million;

     (ii) All dates and times included in the Contract are of the
essence;

     (iii) The Property is being sold in “as is” condition,
subject to the Buyers' right of inspection, and based upon the
knowledge of the Buyers as to the value of the land and whatever
buildings are upon the Property, and not on any representation made
by the Mockoviaks, the Real Estate Agent, or their agents as to
character or quality of the Property;

     (iv) The Mockoviaks will provide a signed Order from the Court
authorizing the sale in order to provide good and marketable clear
title at Closing;

     (v) The Mockoviaks' obligation to sell the Property is
contingent upon obtaining the Court's approval of the Contract and
transaction.  If the Court does not approve the Contract by Sept.
30, 2020, the Closing Date will be moved to the Date which is five
business days after Court approval.  In the event the Mockoviaks
have not obtained Court approval by Nov. 16, 2020, the Buyers may
terminate the Contract at any time prior to Nov. 23, 2020, upon
written notice to the Mockoviaks, given by Nov. 23, 2020;

     (vi) The Mockoviaks agree to maintain the grounds, buildings
and improvements, in good condition, subject to ordinary wear and
tear.  The premises all be in "broom clean condition and free of
debris as of the Closing.  The Mockoviaks represent that all
electrical, plumbing, heating and air-conditioning systems (if
applicable), together with all fixtures included within the terms
of the Contract now work and will work at the Closing.  They
further state, that to the best of their knowledge, there are
currently no leaks or seepage in the roof, walls or basement.
They, however, do not guarantee the continuing condition of the
premises after the
Closing; and

     (vii) A total commission to be paid of 5% of the Purchase
Price or $84,750.  The Commission is being paid directly to the
Real Estate Agent from the proceeds of the sale of the Property.

The alleged liens, claims, and encumbrances against the Property,
and their proposed treatment under the terms of the proposed sale,
are:

     a. The Bank of New York Mellon, A Mortgage, recorded on Feb.
27, 2007, O.R. Book 09759, at Page 0695, Mercer County, New Jersey
- $481,858 (Lien to attach to sale proceeds and paid in full)

     b. Cenlar FSB Servicing on behalf of Citi, Mortgage, Inc.,
recorded on Sept. 17, 2003, O.R. Book 08343, at Page 0744, Mercer
County, New Jersey- $384,517 (Lien to attach to sale  proceeds and
paid in full)

     c. LQD Business Finance, LLC, Notice of Lien, recorded on June
5, 2020, O.R. Book 5, at Page 325, Mercer County, New Jersey - Lien
to attach to proceeds pursuant to the Agreed Interim Order on LQD
Business Finance, LLC's Motion to Restrict Use of Cash Collateral
and Authorizing Debtors to Use Cash Collateral Effective as of
Petition Date and Setting Continued Hearing

Any other charges are comprised of normal and customary closing
costs involved in a residential real estate transaction, as set
forth in Exhibit B.   Any and all realty transfer fee will be paid
from the proceeds of the sale and will not affect the amount of the
disbursements set forth, and will not be the responsibility of the
Mockoviaks or the bankruptcy estate.

The Mockoviaks respectfully ask entry of the Order: (i) approving
the sale of the Property to the Buyers upon the terms set forth in
the Contract, free and clear of all liens, claims, and
encumbrances; (ii) authorizing the Mockoviaks to execute the
Contract; and (iii) authorizing payment of the Commission to the
Real Estate Agent from the sale proceeds.  

Finally, they ask that the Court waives the stay period required
under Fed. R. Bank. P. 6004(h) to the extent necessary, because any
delay could be detrimental to them, their creditors and estates,
and would impair their ability to take advantage of an expeditious
closing of the sale.

A copy of the Contract and the Exhibits is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yyp2fky8 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Robert J. Mockoviak and Sandra H. Mockoviak sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-14372) on April 10, 2020.
The Debtors tapped Luis Salazar, Esq., at Salazar Law as counsel.
On June 17, 2020, the Court appointed Alison Covello and BHH Fox &
Roach Princeton RE as real estate agent.


RONALD A. GOODWIN: Gibtta Buying Wichita Property for $747K
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ronald A. Goodwin and Michelle L. Goodwin ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Kansas to authorize the sale of the real
estate commonly known as 1400 E. 25th St. N., Wichita, Sedgwick
County, Kansas, to Gibtta, LLC or assigns for $747,000, pursuant to
their Commercial Real Estate Contract.

The Debtors have not claimed the Real Estate as exempt.  

The Real Estate will be sold (i) in its present, "as is" condition,
with no express or implied warranties; and (ii) subject to all
rights of way and easements of record.

It will also be sold free and clear of all liens and encumbrances
of record, including, without limitation, the following:

     a. Mortgage dated Sept. 16, 2016 and recorded Sept. 16, 2016
as Doc#/FLM-PG: 29637804 from Ronald Aaron Goodwin, a married
person, to Air Capitol Recycling, LLC in the principal amount of
$300,000, and any other amounts due thereunder;

     b. Federal Tax Lien recorded Sept. 1, 2015 as Doc#/FLM-PG:
29552219 and DOC#/FLM-PG: 29552220, against Ronald A. & Michelle
Goodwin in the amount of $248,572, and any other amounts due
thereunder; and

     c. Federal Tax Lien recorded April 19, 2016 as DOC#/FLM-PG:
29602309 and DOC#/FLM-PG: 29602310, against Ronald A. & Michelle
Goodwin in the amount of $2 10,983, and any other amounts due
thereunder.

From the proceeds of the sale of the Real Estate, the following
will be paid in descending order:

     a. Delinquent general taxes and special assessments
attributable to the Real Estate for fiscal years 2013 through 2018
in the aggregate amount of $3,840, plus accrued interest and
penalties, plus any other amounts due thereunder.

     b. Delinquent general taxes and special assessments
attributable to the Real Estate for fiscal year 20l9 in the amount
of $763, plus accrued interest and penalties, ifany, plus any other
amounts due thereunder.

     c. Debtors share of the unpaid general taxes and assessments
attributable to the Real Estate for fiscal year 2020, prorated to
the date of closing, and any other amounts due thereunder;

     d. Debtors' share of the closing expenses for title insurance,
recording and other related fees as set forth under the Contract;

     e. Attorneys' fees and expenses of the Debtors' counsel in the
amount of $2,250 for legal work performed in relation to the sale;

     f. Broker commission of 6% of the gross Purchase Price to be
evenly divided between Charles E. Sutherland Consultants (3%) and
ERA Great American Realty (3%);

     g. The outstanding balance on the Mortgage of Air Capitol
Recycling, LLC referenced, plus any other amounts due thereunder;

     h. The cumulative outstanding balance on the Federal Tax
Liens, if any, plus any other amounts due thereunder;

     i. The cumulative outstanding balance on the State of Kansas
Withholding Tax Liens, if any, plus any other amounts due
thereunder; and

     j. The remaining balance, if any, to the class of general
unsecured creditors under the Debtors' confirmed Second Amended
Chapter 11 Plan first based on priority and then distributed pro
rata.

The Debtors also move the Court for authority to sell the Real
Estate free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, with any such
liens and encumbrances attaching to the proceeds of the sale.

They further ask the Court to cancel the 14-day stay set forth at
Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h).   

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 4, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Oct. 16, 2019.

A copy of the Contract is available at https://tinyurl.com/yytpsm4r
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Ronald A. Goodwin and Michelle L. Goodwin sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 16-12205) on Nov. 8, 2017.  The
Debtors tapped Mark J. Lazzo, Esq., as counsel.


SEMBLANCE MEDSPA: Tomaino Named as Patient Care Ombudsman
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee asked the Bankruptcy Court for approval of the
appointment of Joseph J. Tomaino as patient care ombudsman in the
case of Semblance Medspa, LLC.

                      About Semblance Medspa

Semblance Medspa LLC provides medical spa services in Albany, New
York.  It offers body sculpting & contouring, skin tightening,
injectables, laser skin rejuvenation, aesthetic treatments, PRP
treatments, laser hair removal, laser vein treatment, skin care
products, and IV hydration.

Semblance Medspa filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case
No. 20-11110) on Aug. 19, 2020.  The Hon. Robert E. Littlefield Jr.
presides over the case.

In the petition signed by Farah Sajid, owner, the Debtor disclosed
$462,553 in assets and $1,551,854 in liabilities.

Nolan Heller Kauffman LLP serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.



SEVEN AND ROSE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Seven and Rose, LLC.
  
                       About Seven and Rose

Seven and Rose LLC filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 20-03757)
on Oct. 5, 2020.  At the time of the filing, Debtor disclosed
assets of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the
same range.  Judge John E. Waites oversees the case.  Barton Brimm,
PA, led by Christine E. Brimm, Esq., serves as the Debtor's legal
counsel.


SLIM DOLLAR: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Slim Dollar Realty Associates, LLC.
  
                About Slim Dollar Realty Associates

Slim Dollar Realty Associates, LLC is a single asset real estate
(as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  Its principal assets
are located at 19 Woodhill Hooksett Road Bow, N.H.

Slim Dollar Realty Associates filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 20-10761)
on Aug. 24, 2020.  Charles R. Sargent, Jr., manager, signed the
petition.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to
$1 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
Judge Bruce A. Harwood oversees the case.  Victor W. Dahar, P.A.
serves as Debtor's legal counsel.


SMARTOURS LLC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: smarTours, LLC
               DBA smarTours
               DBA Smartours Inc
             545 8th Avenue
             Suite 2250
             New York, NY 10018

Business Description:     Founded in 1996, smarTours was founded
                          is a provider of direct-to-
                          consumer, value-oriented travel
                          experiences to a variety of domestic and

                          global destinations.  smarTours offers
                          both pre-packaged tours with pre-set
                          departure dates for individual travelers
                          and customized, private tours for 20+
                          person passenger groups.  To execute
                          both Series and Private Tours, smarTours
                          works directly with air carriers and in-
                          country land operators, the majority of
                          whom have longstanding relationships
                          with the company.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 19, 2020

Court:                    United States Bankruptcy Court
                          District of Delaware

Two affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                        Case No.
     ------                                        --------
     smarTours, LLC (Lead Debtor)                  20-12625
     SPST Holdings, LLC                            20-12626

Judge:                    Hon. Karen B. Owens

Debtors'
Bankruptcy &
Reorganization
Counsel:                  Richard C. Pedone, Esq.
                          NIXON PEABODY LLP
                          53 State Street
                          Boston, Massachusetts 02109
                          Tel: (617) 345-1000
                          Fax: (617) 345-1300
                          Email: rpedone@nixonpeabody.com

                           - and -

                          Christopher M. Desiderio, Esq.
                          Christopher J. Fong, Esq.
                          55 West 46th Street
                          New York, NY 10036
                          Tel: 212-940-3724
                          Fax: 855-900-8613
                          Email: cdesiderio@nixonpeabody.com
                                 cfong@nixonpeabody.com

Debtor's
Local
Delaware
Counsel:                  Christopher P. Simon , Esq.
                          Kevin Mann, Esq.
                          CROSS & SIMON, LLC
                          1105 North Market Street, Suite 901
                          Wilmington, Delaware 19801
                          Tel: (302) 777-4200
                          Fax: (302) 777-4224
                          Email: csimon@crosslaw.com
                                 kmann@crosslaw.com

Debtor's
Financial
Advisor:                  ARISTE ADVISORS LLC

Debtor's
Claims,
Noticing,
Solicitation and
Administrative
Agent:                    PRIME CLERK LLC
https://cases.primeclerk.com/smartours/Home-DocketInfo

smarTours'
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

SmarTours's
Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

SPST Holdings'
Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

SPST Holdings'
Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petitions were signed by Christine Petersen, chief executive
officer.

Copies of the petitions containing, among other items, lists of the
Debtors' 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/ZYABNDI/Smartours_LLC__debke-20-12625__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/PNPQK3I/SPST_Holdings_LLC__debke-20-12626__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


STEIN MART: Sets Sale Procedures for Real Property Leases
---------------------------------------------------------
Stein Mart, Inc. and affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Florida to authorize the sales procedures in
connection with the auction sale of the unexpired non-residential
real property leases listed in Exhibit B.

The Debtors commenced the Store Closing Sales at all of their
retail locations on the Petition Date.  They anticipate that the
Store Closing Sales at for all locations will be completed by Oct.
31, 2020.

The Debtors retained A&G Realty Partners, LLC as their real estate
advisor to market and sell their leasehold interests.  A&G has
advised them that in order to maximize the value of their leasehold
interests, the Sale needs to occur consistent with an open auction
process.  The Debtors believe that A&G will be able to secure
bidders for a number of the Leases in conjunction with the
conclusion of the Store Closing Sales.

To aid in that regard, the Debtors now ask to identify and
ultimately approval of the sales pursuant to the sale procedures.
They believe it is prudent at this time and in the best interests
of their estates and creditors to implement the Sale Procedures
and, accordingly, intend to employ the Sale Procedures prior to a
hearing on the Motion.  The Sale Procedures were developed with A&G
and are consistent with the marketing efforts currently being
undertaken by A&G and are similar to those that have been employed
in other retail liquidations.  The Debtors believe that the Sale
Procedures will assist them in maximizing the value of their
leasehold interests.  A&G will continue to solicit interest as the
Debtors reach the end of the Store Closing Sales and the proposed
auction date set out in the Sale Procedures.

The Debtors propose to sell the Leases through one or more sale
transactions pursuant to the terms of an assumption and assignment
agreement (or agreements) to be negotiated by and between the
Debtors and proposed purchaser(s) and executed upon completion of
one or
more auctions for the Leases.  

Specifically, the Debtors will implement the following Sale
Procedures for the Sale of the Leases and conduct the Auction(s) in
accordance therewith:

     a. Bid Deadline: Oct. 9, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Deposit: 10% of the purchase price

     c. The Debtors will notify each Bidder whether such party is a
Qualified Bidder by Oct. 12, 2020.

     d. Auction(s): If the Debtors receive more than one Qualified
Bid for all or certain of the Leases, they will conduct auction(s)
with respect to the Sale of such leases to determine and highest
and best Qualified Bid.  The Auction will commence on Oct. 15, 2020
at 10:00 a.m. or such other time as the Debtors may provide so long
as such change is communicated reasonably in advance by the Debtors
to all bidders, and other invitees.  The Auction will be conducted
by video conference or teleconference, the detail of which will be
provided by the Debtors to Qualified Bidders in advance of the
Auction.

     e. Sale Hearing: Oct. 22, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.

     f. Any counterparty to a Lease proposed to be sold or
transferred at Auction will be deemed a Qualified Bidder.

In connection with the Sale, the Debtors ask approval to assume and
assign the Leases to the Successful Bidder.  The Cure Objection
Deadline is Oct. 19, 2020 at 5:00 p.m.

To maximize the value received and limit the incurrence of
administrative rent for the month of November, the Debtors ask to
sell the Leases as soon as possible after all closing conditions
have been achieved or waived.  For this reason, they submit that
ample cause exists to justify a waiver of the 14-day stay imposed
by Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d), to the extent applicable.


A copy of the Exhibit B is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yytqosxs from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                       About Stein Mart

Stein Mart, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMRT) -- http://www.SteinMart.com/-- is
a national specialty omni off-price retailer offering designer and
name-brand f ashion apparel, home decor, accessories and shoes at
everyday discount prices.  Stein Mart provides real value that
customers love every day. The company operates 281 stores across 30
states.

Stein Mart Inc. and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case Nos. 20-02387 to
20-02389) on Aug. 12, 2020.  As of May 2, 2020, the Debtors had
total assets of $757.6 million and total liabilities of $791.2
million.  

Judge Jerry A. Funk oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Foley & Lardner LLP as their legal counsel,
Clear Thinking Group LLC as financial advisor, and Stretto as
claims and noticing agent.


SUGARHOUSE HSP: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR; Outlook Negative
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed all of its ratings on
Philadelphia-based gaming operator Sugarhouse HSP Gaming Prop.
Mezz. L.P., including its 'B-' issuer credit rating, and removed
them from CreditWatch, where S&P placed them with negative
implications on March 20, 2020.

The negative outlook reflects continued earnings risk and
uncertainty around potential further mandated property closures and
increased capacity restrictions, and given the possibility that new
competition could be more severe than S&P currently anticipates.
The negative outlook also reflects the potential, although S&P
believes it is unlikely, that Sugarhouse is unable to obtain
covenant relief under its revolver.

The rating affirmation reflects S&P's forecast for Sugarhouse to
grow its EBITDA sequentially through the second half of 2020 to a
level that covers interest expense by at least 2x, following a
meaningful decline in the first half due to the closure of the
casino between mid-March and mid-July because of the coronavirus
pandemic. Further, Sugarhouse will likely generate good levels of
discretionary cash flow and maintain sufficient liquidity as it
ramps EBITDA and absorbs the impact of additional competition
expected to open in early 2021.

"We believe EBITDA will rise sequentially through 2020, driven by
cost reductions and the benefit of online gaming and sports
betting.   We expect operating performance in the second half of
the year to benefit from cost reductions management implemented
during the closure, and online gaming and sports operations. We
believe Sugarhouse will likely maintain lower levels of marketing,
labor, and amenity related expenses as long as capacity
restrictions and limitations on food and beverage offerings remain
in place," S&P said.

Further, S&P is forecasting revenue from online gaming and sports
betting, which has grown sequentially each quarter since their
launch in mid-2019, will largely offset a decline in casino revenue
in the second half of 2020. S&P is forecasting casino revenue to
continue to be down year over year in the second half of 2020
because of meaningful capacity restrictions at the casino required
by local authorities to promote social distancing and limit the
spread of the coronavirus. Additionally, some customers may remain
cautious around visiting indoor public spaces because of the virus.
Further, discretionary spending may be pressured because of
continued high unemployment, which S&P expects to persist through
at least 2021. S&P also believes Sugarhouse's ability to offer
online gaming and sports betting helps mitigate the risks of
potential additional casinos closures or material changes in
capacity or other restrictions at the physical casino if cases of
the virus increase in the Philadelphia area.

New competition will have a significant impact on Sugarhouse's
EBITDA in 2021 compared to 2019, but Sugarhouse may be able to
maintain interest coverage of at least 2x.  The Live! Casino &
Hotel Philadelphia, located around 10 miles to the south of Rivers
Philadelphia, is expected to open in early 2021, marketing largely
to the same customer base as Sugarhouse. Since S&P believes the
Philadelphia gaming market is fairly mature, the new casino would
likely take share from Sugarhouse as opposed to growing the market.
Therefore, S&P believes Sugarhouse's revenue will shrink as it
loses some customers to the new casino, and EBITDA will decrease
from both lower revenue and the likely increase in marketing
spending in the face of new competition.

S&P's forecast for 2021, compared to 2019, assumes the following:

-- Total revenue declines around 5%. Casino revenue declines 25%
to 30% because of new competition and continued consumer fears
around being in enclosed public spaces. The casino revenue decline
is partly offset by higher online gaming and sports betting revenue
in 2021, which was introduced in mid-2019.

-- EBITDA to decline around 25% to 30%. S&P believes the revenue
decline will be exacerbated by S&P's assumption Sugarhouse will
increase its marketing spend, compared to 2019, in light of new
competition. That being said, if significant capacity and operating
restrictions persist throughout 2021, S&P believes Sugarhouse may
not increase its marketing spend in response to new competition as
much as it would otherwise in a normal operating environment.

-- Nevertheless, even incorporating the expected EBITDA decline in
2021, S&P believes that absent a further mandated casino closure,
and associated cash burn, over the next few quarters Sugarhouse
will likely be able to maintain EBITDA coverage of interest expense
of at least 2x and generate good levels of discretionary cash
flow.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Credit Factors for this
Credit Rating change:

-- Health and Safety Factors

The negative outlook reflects continued risk and uncertainty around
Sugarhouse's ultimate ability to maintain EBITDA at a level that
covers interest expense by at least 2x since there is the potential
for further mandated property closures and increased capacity
restrictions, and given the potential negative impact of new
competition could be more severe than S&P anticipates. The negative
outlook also reflects the potential, although S&P believes it is
unlikely, that Sugarhouse will be unable to obtain covenant relief
under its revolver. In this unlikely scenario, revolving lenders
could accelerate amounts due, which would drain most of
Sugarhouse's cash balances and result in a severe stress on
Sugarhouse's liquidity position.

"We could lower the ratings if EBITDA generation in the next few
quarters is around 30% lower than we are currently forecasting,
since, in that scenario, we believe EBITDA coverage of interest
expense would be in the mid-1x area, a level that is not aligned
with the current rating. We could also lower ratings if Sugarhouse
appears unable to obtain covenant relief under its revolver," S&P
said.

"We may revise the outlook to stable once Sugarhouse demonstrates
it can sustain EBITDA at a level that translates into interest
coverage of at least 2x. Higher ratings are unlikely until we can
observe the impact of new competition. However, we could raise the
rating one notch if we believe the company will maintain adjusted
leverage below 6x and EBITDA coverage of interest above 2x," the
rating agency said.


TEXAS SOUTH: Delays Form 10-Q Filing Due to Working Capital Issues
------------------------------------------------------------------
Texas South Energy, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Form 12b-25 notifying the delay in the filing of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept. 30, 2020.
The Company was unable to complete its preparation of its Form 10-Q
in a timely matter because of working capital issues.

The Company's Form 10Q's for the period ended June 30, 2019, Sept.
30, 2019, March 31, 2020, June 30, 2020 and the 10K for
Dec. 31, 2019 have not yet been filed.

                         About Texas South

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, Texas South Energy, Inc. is
engaged in the oil and gas business, generating or acquiring oil
and gas projects, drilling and operating the wells, and producing
the oil and gas reserves.

Texas South reported a net loss of $3.11 million for the 12 months
ended Dec. 31, 2018, following a net loss of $3.84 million for the
12 months ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2019, the Company
had $14.73 million in total assets, $9.19 million in total
liabilities, and $5.53 million in total stockholders' equity.

LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's
auditor since 2013, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated April 1, 2019, citing that the Company's absence of
significant revenues, recurring losses from operations, and its
need for additional financing in order to fund its projected loss
in 2019 raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


TM HEALTHCARE: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of TM Healthcare
Holdings, LLC and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     1. Sheryl Miller
        VP Sales & Business Development
        Advanced Data Systems Corp.
        15 Prospect St.
        Paramus, NJ 07652
        Phone: 800-899-4237 Ext. 2269
        Fax: 201-689-4610
        Sheryl.Miller@adsc.com

     2. Tamara D. McKeown, Esq.
        (Counsel to Ver Ploeg & Marino, P.A.)
        Ver Ploeg & Lumpkin, P.A.
        (n/k/a Ver Ploeg & Marino, P.A.)
        Aaronson Schantz Beiley, P.A.
        100 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite #3450
        Miami, FL 33131
        Phone: 786-594-3000
        Fax: 305-579-9073
        tmckeown@aspalaw.com

     3. Dan Vacca, Director
        Winships Pharmacy, Inc.
        721 North Lake Blvd.
        North Palm Beach, FL 33408
        Phone: 561-842-2444
        Fax: 561-842-2445
        winshipspharmacy@gmail.com

     4. Elizabeth Gold
        Director of Operations
        Center for Spiritual Living Palm Desert
        45630 Portola Avenue
        Palm Desert, CA 92260
        Phone: 760-272-0735
        elizabethiwca@gmail.com

     5. Dr. Mary Lynn Rapier
        California Department of Insurance and
        Dr. Mary Lynn Rapier
        306 Bora Bora Way, #103
        Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
        Phone: 301-429-3771
        rapierml@me.com
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                  About TM Healthcare Holdings

TM Healthcare Holdings, LLC, a Stuart, Fla.-based company in the
health care business, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 20-20024) on Sept. 17,
2020. The petition was signed by CFO Paul Kamps.  At the time of
the filing, Debtor had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of between $50 million and $100 million.  Judge Erik P.
Kimball oversees the case.  Shraiberg Landau & Page P.A. is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


TOWN SPORTS: Ch.11 Bankruptcy Filing Stays Kolumiichuk Class Suit
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Defendants Town Sports International Holdings, Inc. and affiliates
on Sept. 14, 2020, filed voluntary petitions for Chapter 11
bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware, thereby triggering an automatic stay of the case
captioned MYKOLA KOLOMIICHUK, on behalf of himself and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TOWN SPORTS INTERNATIONAL
HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants, No. 18-CV-1223 (KMK)
(S.D.N.Y.)

In light of the Defendants' bankruptcy petitions, District Judge
Kenneth M. Karas denied without prejudice the Defendants' Motion
for Summary Judgment and the Plaintiff's Motion for Class
Certification. The Parties may renew their motions once the
automatic stay is lifted.

A copy of the Court's Order is available at https://bit.ly/2H7yy39
from Leagle.com.

                         About Town Sports

Headquartered in Elmsford, New York, Town Sports International
Holdings, Inc. -- https://www.townsportsinternational.com/ -- is a
diversified holding company with subsidiaries engaged in a number
of business and investment activities.  The Company's largest
operating subsidiary has been involved in the fitness industry
since 1973 and has grown to become owner and operator of fitness
clubs in the Northeast region of the United States.  Town Sports
owns and operates brands such as New York Sports Clubs, Boston
Sports Clubs, Philadelphia Sports Clubs, Washington Sports Clubs,
Lucille Roberts and Total Woman.

Town Sports International, LLC and several of its affiliates filed
for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-12168)
on Sept. 14, 2020. The petitions were signed by Patrick Walsh,
chief executive officer.

As of the petition date, the Debtors were estimated to have $500
million to $1 billion in consolidated assets and consolidated
liabilities.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $794.28 million
in total assets, $882.62 million in total liabilities, and $88.34
million in total stockholders' deficit.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, Town
Sports operated 186 fitness clubs under various brand names,
collectively serving approximately 605,000 members.  

The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi presides over the cases.

The Debtors have tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP and
Kirkland & Ellis LLP as their bankruptcy counsel, Houlihan Lokey,
Inc. as financial advisor and investment banker, and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring LLC as claims and noticing agent.





TRIDENT BRANDS: Delays Filing of August 31 Quarterly Report
-----------------------------------------------------------
Trident Brands Incorporated was unable to file, without
unreasonable effort and expense, its Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for
the quarter ended Aug. 31, 2020 because the Company's auditor has
not completed their review of the Form 10-Q.  It is anticipated
that the Form 10-Q, will be filed on or before the 5th calendar day
following the prescribed due date of the Registrant's Form 10-Q.

                        About Trident Brands

Based in Brookfield, Wisconsin, Trident Brands Incorporated, f/k/a
Sandfield Ventures Corp., is focused on the development of high
growth branded and private label consumer products and ingredients
within the nutritional supplement, life sciences and food and
beverage categories.  The platforms the Company is focusing on
include: life science technologies and related products that have
applications to a range of consumer products; nutritional
supplements and related consumer goods providing defined benefits
to the consumer; and functional foods and beverages ingredients
with defined health and wellness benefits.

Trident Brands reported a net loss of $12.22 million for the 12
months ended Nov. 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $8.42 million
for the 12 months ended Nov. 30, 2018.  As of May 31, 2020, the
Company had $2.91 million in total assets, $45.75 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $42.84 million.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2015, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
March 16, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


VAQUERIA ORTIZ: $247.8K Sale of 23K-L Milk Quota Approved
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Puerto Rico authorized Vaqueria Ortiz Rodriguez, Inc.'s
sale of the total amount of 22,650 liters of Milk Quota from the
Oficina de Reglamentacion de Industria Lechera's License 3111,
pursuant to the following:

     A. The amount of 12,000 liters will be sold to Hacienda Buenos
Aires Dairy Farm, Inc., with PR Department of State number 129598.
The corporation is represented by Isamel Rosado Nieves and it has
the following address: P.O. Box 840 Ricon, PR 00667.  The 12,000
liters will be sold at $10 each for a total amount of $120,000; and


     B. The amount of 10,650 will be sold to Liomar Velez Chaves
with address: Urb Villa Norma, Calle 4 Casa D22, Quebradilla, PR
00678.  The 10,650 liters will be sold at $12 per liter for a total
amount of $127,800.

The sale is free and clear of liens under section 363 (f) filed by
the Debtors and secured creditor Condado 4, LLC.

Condado will receive the full proceeds from the transaction and no
funds will be disbursed to the Debtors or any other party.  

                About Vaqueria Ortiz Rodriguez

Vaqueria Ortiz Rodriguez, Inc., is a privately held company that
operates in the dairy cattle and milk production industry.

Vaqueria Ortiz Rodriguez previously sought bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-00063) on Jan. 11, 2016.

Vaqueria Ortiz Rodriguez again sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 19-01386) on March
14, 2019.  In the petition signed by Carlos Horacio Ortiz Colon,
president, the Debtor disclosed $1,674,040 in assets and
$3,686,701
in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte
Inclan.  Homel Mercado Justiniano, Esq., is the Debtor's counsel.


VERACODE PARENT: S&P Assigns 'B-' ICR on Proposed Debt Issuance
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issuer credit rating to
U.S.-based application security testing (AST) provider Veracode
Parent, LP, which seeks to issue a $330 million senior secured
credit facility, consisting of a $300 million senior secured term
loan and a $30 million revolver. The company will use the proceeds
to repay existing debt.

S&P is also assigning its 'B-' issue-level and '3' recovery ratings
to the proposed senior secured term loan.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that despite high
leverage exceeding 10x, Veracode will sustain revenue growth in the
high-single-digit percent area while modestly improving margins and
cash generation," the rating agency said.

Financial leverage, including Class A equity treated as debt, is
high at over 10x

The 'B-' issuer credit rating reflects Veracode's very high initial
S&P Global Ratings-adjusted leverage of about 14x as of June 30,
2020, as well as the rating agency's expectation that leverage will
remain above 10x through the next 12-24 months. S&P's adjusted
leverage treats the firm's Class A equity as debt, and secured
leverage absent Class A equity would be mid-5x at transaction
close. Despite high adjusted leverage, S&P expects Veracode to
generate considerable free cash flow of about $30 million annually,
supported by a low cash interest burden, given much of the adjusted
debt is constituted by Class A equity without a cash dividend. $100
million of cash, pro forma or closing, will provide additional
liquidity support.

"We expect application security markets to grow, but the
competitive landscape remains fragmented," the rating agency said.

As modern application development becomes more complex, the
increasing need for security has expanded demand for AST products.
The market has grown in recent years, driven by an increasing
dominance of code across all businesses and the resulting demand
for tools to meet security requirements. As deployment options
expand to cloud and hybrid environments, and organizations rely
more on open source software, security requirements have expanded
beyond network security controls to security throughout the entire
application development process. Nevertheless, the market remains
highly competitive, and a fragmented competitive landscape limits
pricing power.

Operational discipline has improved since Veracode's separation
from Broadcom, with improving margins and cash generation

Veracode increased revenues nearly 19% through fiscal year 2020,
driven by about 20% growth in its software-as-a-service (SaaS)
business through strong bookings and successful upselling to its
existing customer base. The company has been transforming its
business by dedicating sales force toward land and expand
opportunities, increasing efficiency through product development
and integration, and reducing spend to lower research and
development costs. Revenues in first-quarter fiscal 2021 (ended
June 30, 2020) grew 17% and were driven by a strong backlog in
fiscal 2020. Veracode was largely unaffected by the COVID-19
pandemic as its exposure to high-impacted industries is minimal and
offerings can be deployed remotely through application programming
interfaces (APIs).

As Veracode focuses on upselling and higher-value accounts, S&P
expects revenue growth to moderate to the high-single-digit
percentage area while margins modestly improve from current levels.
It expects revenue growth to slow to around 8% in fiscal 2021,
while S&P Global Ratings-adjusted EBITDA margins rise to about 25%
in 2021 from about 22% in 2020, mainly stemming from SaaS revenue
growth with some contribution from cost controls. S&P expects the
secular tailwinds in the application security industry to remain
robust, allowing Veracode to gain share in the expanding total
addressable market (TAM). The company also has high retention rates
among its diversified customer base. Its top customer represented
less than 5% in fiscal year 2020 (ended March 31, 2020).

The stable outlook on Veracode reflects S&P's expectation that the
company will grow revenues in the mid- to high-single-digit percent
area while modestly improving profitability and maintaining cash
flow generation. S&P expects the company's recurring revenue base,
which represents about 95% of its total revenues, to grow with
strength in its SaaS products.

"We could lower the rating if Veracode suffers from competitive
pressures that lead to market loss, weaker-than-expected revenue
growth, or deterioration in profitability, thus leading to
increased leverage or negative free cash flow. We would also
downgrade Veracode if it cannot maintain adequate liquidity on a
sustained basis," S&P said.

"Although unlikely over the next 12 months given Veracode's high
starting leverage, we would consider an upgrade if the firm
maintains revenue growth and expands EBITDA margins such that S&P
Global Ratings-adjusted leverage is sustained under 7x and its free
operating cash flow (FOCF)-to-debt ratio remains above 5%," the
rating agency said.


VRAI TABERNACLE: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Vrai Tabernacle de Jesus, Inc.
           Vrai Tabernackle of Jesus Christ, Inc.
           FKA True Tabernacle of Jesus Christ, Inc
        1656 S Congress Ave.
        West Palm Beach, FL 33406

Business Description: Vrai Tabernacle de Jesus, Inc. is a
                      nonprofit religious organization.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 19, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida

Case No.: 20-21421

Judge: Hon. Mindy A. Mora

Debtor's Counsel: Brian K. McMahon, Esq.
                  BRIAN K. MCMAHON
                  1401 Forum Way
                  6th Floor
                  West Palm Beach, FL 33401
                  Tel: 561-478-2500
                  Email: briankmcmahon@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Lenese Naval-Estiverne, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's six unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/view/EQV6LFA/Vrai_Tabernacle_de_Jesus_Inc__flsbke-20-21421__0001.0.pdf?mcid=tGE4TAMA


WILLIAM FOCAZIO: Ombudsman Filed Sixth Report
---------------------------------------------
Virginia M. Plaza, R.Ph., the patient care ombudsman for William
Focazio, MD PA & Endo Surgical Center of North Jersey, filed her
sixth report on patient care.

The PCO conducted a short-notice, limited visit of the medical
practice of William J. Focazio, M.D., on Sept. 22. It had been over
1.5 years since the PCO's last in-person site visit to either the
medical practice or the Endo-Surgical Center of North Jersey and
the reinstatement of operations.

During the visit, the PCO observed that the medical practice
facility appeared in good repair, with staffing appropriate to the
number of patients scheduled for Dr. Focazio, as well as adequate
seating space as recommended by the CDC. All the patients observed
wore masks and were seated at recommended spacing of 6 feet. All
the clinical staff wore surgical masks, the administrative staff
were mostly wearing surgical masks. Hand sanitizer is available at
the entrance to the waiting room.

The PCO also made a follow-up visit on October 1 for ESC, where she
reviewed ESC staff credentials and ESC operating procedures and
protocols. The PCO noted that the current staff advanced cardiac
life support credentials and malignant hyperthermia training were
up-to date. However, the PCO also observed that there were
documents and credentials present from past employees and
physicians that should be archived.  

During the October 1st visit, the PCO also observed the ESC did not
have dantrolene available in the locked malignant hyperthermia cart
-- a requirement for ASCs. Malignant hyperthermia is a rare severe
reaction to general anesthesia.

Accordingly, the PCO pursued Dr. Focazio for the lack of dantrolene
and succinylcholine. Dr. Focazio indicated that the drugs were not
needed to be readily available as his patients were sedated with
propofol during their procedures. But the PCO advised Dr. Focazio
that propofol use does not negate the need for dantrolene and
succinylcholine to be available in the ESC. Now, Dr. Focazio
reported that the ESC had dantrolene available in the malignant
hyperthermia cart and that succinylcholine was available in the
anesthesia refrigerator.

A copy of the PCO's Sixth Report dated October 15, 2020 is
available at PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/y3b78rgw at no
extra charge.

               About Endo Surgical Center of
                     North Jersey, P.C.

Headquartered in Clifton, New Jersey, William Focazio, MD, PA, Endo
Surgical Center of North Jersey, and Fenner Ave., LLC, are
privately held companies that operate in the healthcare industry
specializing in internal medicine and gastroenterology.

William Focazio, MD, PA and its affiliates Endo Surgical Center of
North Jersey and Fenner Ave., LLC sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-10752,
18-10753 and 18-10755, respectively) on Jan. 13, 2018. William
Focazio, M.D., principal, signed the petitions.

At the time of filing, William Focazio, MD, PA has $1,130,000 in
total assets and $12,830,000 in total liabilities; and Endo
Surgical Center has $1,170,000 in total assets and $16,490,000 in
total liabilities.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia oversees the case.

Trenk DiPasquale Della Fera & Sodono, P.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.

Virginia M. Plaza was appointed as the patient care ombudswoman for
the Debtors.  Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC, serves as counsel
to the PCO.



YOUNGEVITY INTERNATIONAL: Accepts Resignation of Accounting Firm
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Youngevity International, Inc. has
accepted the resignation of Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. as the
Company's registered independent certified public accounting firm.
The Board was notified by Mayer Hoffman that it had resigned,
effective Oct. 12, 2020.  Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. has served as
the Company's registered independent certified public accountants
since 2011.

No accountant's report on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for either of the past two years (i.e., the years ended
Dec. 31, 2018 and 2017), contained an adverse opinion or a
disclaimer of opinion or was qualified or modified as to
uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except for a
going concern modification included in both the 2018 and 2017
accountant's reports expressing substantial doubt about the ability
of the Company to continue as a going concern.

During the Company's two most recent fiscal years and the
subsequent interim periods proceeding such resignation, there were
no disagreements with Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. on any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure,
or auditing scope or procedure.  During the Company's two most
recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim periods proceeding
such resignation, there were no "reportable events" as that term is
described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, other than as
included in the notification on Oct. 12, 2020 from Mayer Hoffman
McCann P.C. stating that the internal controls necessary for the
Company to develop reliable consolidated financial statements do
not exist and that information has come to its attention that has
led it to no longer be able to rely on management's
representations.

         Non-Reliance on Previously Issued Financial Statements

On Oct. 13, 2020, the Audit Committee of the Board, following
discussions with management, determined that the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019 and Sept. 30, 2019 contained in the
Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q previously filed with the
SEC on May 20, 2019, Aug. 14, 2019 and Nov. 18, 2019 should no
longer be relied upon.  Similarly, related press releases, earnings
releases, and investor communications describing the Company's
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for those
periods should no longer be relied upon.

The determination of the Audit Committee to restate the
above-referenced condensed consolidated financial statements was
based upon certain errors to the Company's condensed consolidated
financial statements regarding the recognition of revenues and cost
of sales of green coffee for transfer to H&H Export Y CIA.  LTDA in
Nicaragua.  During the 2019 audit procedures, the Company
determined that the Company did not own the unprocessed green
coffee prior to transferring the coffee to H&H and is therefore an
agent and processor of green coffee on behalf of H&H.  This
determination meant that revenues on green coffee transferred to
H&H should have been recorded at net (the added value of the
processing of the green coffee beans) rather than at gross, as
previously reported.  Based on its assessment, management has
determined that a restatement of the condensed consolidated
financial statements included in Quarterly Reports for the quarters
ended March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019 and Sept. 30, 2019 was
necessary due to a change in the accounting treatment of its
revenue derived from its green coffee sales, which had been
recorded on a gross basis and should be recorded on a net basis
reflecting the deduction of cost of revenue related to such
revenue.

The Audit Committee, following discussions with management, has
determined that rather than recognizing revenues and cost of sales
of green coffee to H&H on a gross basis, the revenues and cost of
sales to H&H should be recognized on a net basis reflecting the
deduction of cost of revenue related to such revenue.  The change
in accounting for the revenues and cost of sales of green coffee to
H&H from gross to net is not expected to have any impact on the
Company's net income/loss.

In addition to this change in accounting for recording revenue on
green coffee processing on behalf of H&H, management also continued
to update its review of the Dec. 31, 2019 reserves for
uncollectable receivables for the remaining net trade account
receivable, note receivable and other receivables due from H&H.
Management has determined that it is probable that these
receivables from H&H are impaired and the condensed consolidated
financial statement restatements of the financial statements
included in Quarterly Reports for the quarters ended March 31,
2019, June 30, 2019 and Sept. 30, 2019 will be adjusted to reflect
an impairment.  The Company' subsidiary, CLR Roasters LLC, has
entered into an extended payment program with H&H which it expects
will allow CLR in the future to realize the amounts due based on
future shipments of green coffee by CLR to H&H for delivery to its
customers; provided, that the amount of currently scheduled
shipments of green coffee by CLR to H&H for delivery to H&H's
customers during 2020 is approximately $3.8 million, resulting in
significant uncertainty as to the timing and amount of future
payments and shipments for the balance of approximately $5.0
million.

The Company also has recently determined that the value of the
collateral underlying a promissory note, due November 2020, in the
principal and interest amount of $5.3 million, from H&H has been
impaired, resulting in an impairment allowance for $5.3 million.
As a result, management believes it is more than likely that the
Company will not collect the outstanding balance and interest due
on the note receivable, and allowances for doubtful accounts should
be recognized at Dec. 31, 2019.

The Company has therefore recognized allowances for collectability
against the remaining net trade account receivable, notes
receivable and other receivables due from H&H for approximately
$5.0 million, $5.3 million and $397,000, respectively.  These
amounts have been recorded as allowances for doubtful accounts at
the end of Dec. 31, 2019.

The Company intends to file as soon as practicable the restated
condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarters ended
March 31, 2019, June 30, 2019 and Sept. 30, 2019, together with its
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019 and
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March
31, 2020 and June 30, 2020.

                        About Youngevity

Chula Vista, California-based Youngevity International, Inc. --
https://ygyi.com/ -- is a multi-channel lifestyle company operating
in three distinct business segments including a commercial coffee
enterprise, a commercial hemp enterprise, and a multi-vertical omni
direct selling enterprise.  The Company features a multi country
selling network and has assembled a virtual Main Street of products
and services under one corporate entity, YGYI offers products from
the six top selling retail categories: health/nutrition,
home/family, food/beverage (including coffee), spa/beauty,
apparel/jewelry, as well as innovative services.

Youngevity reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $23.50 million for 2018 following a net loss attributable to
common stockholders of $12.69 million for 2017.  As of Sept. 30,
2019, the Company had $141.18 million in total assets, $85.01
million in total liabilities, and $56.17 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., in San Diego, California, the Company's
auditor since 2011, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated April 15, 2019, on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the
Company has recurring losses and is dependent on additional
financing to fund operations.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***