/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/200814.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, August 14, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 226

                            Headlines

402-420 METROPOLITAN: Aug. 12 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
AEROCENTURY CORP: Has $10.2M Net Loss for Quarter Ended March 31
AGD SYSTEMS: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
AGF MACHINERY: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
AGILE THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $10.8M Net Loss in Second Quarter

ALPINE 4 TECHNOLOGIES: MaloneBailey LLP Raises Going Concern Doubt
AMERICAN BLUE: Unsecureds to Get Paid from GUC Plan Consideration
ANGI GROUP: Moody's Assigns First-Time Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
APC AUTOMOTIVE: Joint Prepackaged Plan Confirmed by Judge
ARR INVESTMENTS: Unsecureds to Receive Payment from Equity Pool

ASCENA RETAIL: To Report Significant Loss in Fiscal Q4
ASSOCIATED MATERIALS: Moody's Rates $250MM Secured Notes 'B3'
BALL CORP: S&P Rates New $1BB Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB+'
BAYLESS PROPERTY: $1M Sale of Marietta Property to Brown Approved
BAYSIDE WASTE: Wants Until August 14 to File Plan & Disclosure

BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL: Has $3.4M Net Loss for March 31 Quarter
BOOZ ALLEN: Moody's Rates Planned $500MM Unsecured Notes 'Ba2'
BRIGGS & STRATTON: Taps King & Spalding as Special Counsel
BROOKS BROTHERS: List of 38 Stores Permanently Closed
BROOKS BROTHERS: Selling to Simon & SPARC for $325M

BYRNA TECHNOLOGIES: Says Substantial Going Concern Doubt Exists
CAPITAL TRUCK: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CDW CORP: S&P Rates $630MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
CEL-SCI CORP: Posts $10.2 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
CERESOTA FUNDING II: Files for Bankruptcy Protection

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY: Forshey Represents Royalty Committee Members
CINEMARK HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'B+'; Ratings on Watch Negative
CLEAN ENERGY: Fruci & Associates II Raises Going Concern Doubt
CLEARWATER PAPER: S&P Rates $275MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
CORDOVACANN CORP: Has CAD23,000 Net Loss for March 31 Quarter

COVANTA HOLDING: S&P Rates New 2020A, 2020B Tax-Exempt Notes 'B'
COVIA HOLDINGS: Hires Jackson Walker as Legal Counsel
CRESTVIEW HOSPITALITY: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
CWGS ENTERPRISES: Moody's Upgrades CFR to B2, Outlook Stable
DALLAS TRADING: Bank of the West Objects to Disclosure Statement

DREAM BIG: McDonald's Offers $5M for Substantially All Assets
EARTH FARE: Buyer Restart Operations at 3 Stores
ELK PETROLEUM: Liquidation Plan Confirmed by Bankruptcy Court
FERRELLGAS LP: $500-Mil. Unsecured Notes Cast Going Concern Doubt
FERRELLGAS PARTNERS: Debt Maturities Cast Going Concern Doubt

FIELDWOOD ENERGY: Clark Hill Represents Zurich American, 2 Others
FIELDWOOD ENERGY: Davis Polk, Haynes Represent Secured Lender Group
FIVE DREAMS: J Tucker Buying Acworth Property for $2.5 Million
FRE 355 INVESTMENT: Unsec. Creditors to Have 9.15% Recovery in Plan
FREEDOM COMMS: To Revise Disclosure to Settle Disputes with CDTFA

FREEDOM OIL: CarMax Offers $17K for 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
GALILEO LEARNING: Committee Hires GlassRatner as Financial Advisor
GARBANZO MEDITERRANEAN: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
GERALDINE R. ROSINE: Trustee Selling El Sobrante Property for $407K
GERASIMOS ALIVIZATOS: $245K Sale of Ocean City Property Approved

GLENN POOL: S&P Lowers Rating on Senior Secured Notes to 'CCC (sf)'
GLOBAL ASSET: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
GOODNO'S JEWELRY: 36 North Wants Plan to Include Lease Payments
GREATER APOSTOLIC: Examiner's $3.5M Sale of San Diego Props. Okayed
GUGERLI HOLDINGS: Has Until Oct. 7 to File Plan & Disclosures

HALLOWELL HOUSE: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
HAMILTON PROJECTS: S&P Rates $900MM Sr. Secured Term Loan B 'BB-'
HARVEST PLASMA: $2M Sale of Mount Pleasant Property Approved
HARVEST PLASMA: Creditors to Get Paid from Asset Sale Proceeds
HERSCHEND ENTERTAINMENT: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR; Outlook Negative

HORIZON GLOBAL: S&P Withdraws 'CCC' Issuer Credit Rating
HUDSON RIVER TRADING: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR; Outlook Stable
HVI CAT CANYON: Trustee Seeks Approval to Hire Tax Consultant
IMPACT GLASS: Unsecured Creditors to Receive $132K Over 5 Years
INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTION: Aug. 25 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set

IRON MOUNTAIN: S&P Rates New $850MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
J.C. PENNEY: Closes Kings Plaza & Manhattan Mall Locations
J.C. PENNEY: Still Working on Deal for Going Concern Sale
JAGGED PEAK: David Cook Objects to Joint Plan of Liquidation
KM-T.E.H. REALTY 10: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

LE TOTE: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
LILIS ENERGY: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
LUBY'S INC: Says Conditions Exist that Raise Going Concern Doubt
MACHINE TECH: Trust Custodian Buying Adel Property for $129K
MCCLATCHY CO: Chatham to Name Hunter as CEO Upon Emergence

METAL PARTNERS: Agrees to Terminate Exclusivity as to Committee
METAL PARTNERS: Sept. 24 Auction of Substantially All Assets Set
MEYZEN FAMILY: Trustee's Aug. 26 Auction of All Resto Assets Set
MJJW PORTFOLIO: Wright Buying Tampa Property for $410K
MONTAGE RESOURCES: Moody's Places B2 CFR on Review for Upgrade

MURPHY SHIPPING: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
NAI CAPITAL: Aug. 14 Due for ROX to Reply to All Assets Sale
NEIMAN MARCUS: Creditors' Committee Objects to Plan Disclosures
NESSALLA LLC: Gets Court Approval to Hire Restructuring Manager
NORTHWEST COMPANY: Hires Mazars USA to Provide Tax Services

OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM: Fitch Rates Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB/RR4'
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM: Moody's Rates Senior Unsecured Notes 'Ba2'
ODYSSEY GROUP: Low Working Capital Casts Going Concern Doubt
PATRIOT WELL: Sept. 14 Auction of Substantially All Assets Set
PERMIAN HOLDCO 1: Sept. 29 Auction of Substantially All Assets

PETROTEQ ENERGY: Has $3.2M Comprehensive Loss for Feb. 29 Quarter
PPV INC: Seeks Aug. 21 Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period
PROTEUS DIGITAL: Morris James Updates on Equity Security Holders
RAIN CARBON: Moody's Lowers CFR to B2, Outlook Stable
REMORA PETROLEUM: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors

RILEY DRIVE: City Center Buying Resto Bar Assets for $25K
ROBERTS PROPERTY: BBVA USA Objects to Amended Plan & Disclosure
S&S CRAFTSMEN: Oct. 5 Auction of Substantially All Assets
SABLE PERMIAN: Oct. 2 Auction of Substantially All Assets
SCOTT C. GRAY: $940K Sale of Santa Rosa Residential Property Okayed

SEABRAS 1: Emerges from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
SOMERVILLE BREWING: Aug. 19-20 Online Auction of Personal Property
SOMERVILLE BREWING: Online Auction of Personal Property Approved
STEIN MART: Files Voluntary Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petitions
SUNNY HILLS: Burns-Coffins Buying Walnut Creek Property for $600K

SUPPERTIME INC: Has Until Sept. 15 to File Reorganization Plan
SUR LA TABLE: In Chapter 11 to Pursue Quick Sale
TAILORED BRANDS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
TARGET GROUP: Needs More Working Capital to Remain Going Concern
TBH19 LLC: Creditors to Get Paid from Asset Sale Proceeds

TROIANO TRUCKING: Trustee Selling Homeland Assets for $2 Million
TROIANO TRUCKING: Trustee Selling Homeland Assets for $2M
TRUE RELIGION: Asks Court to Extend Plan Exclusivity Thru Nov. 9
ULTRA PETROLEUM: Has $217.6M Net Loss for Quarter Ended March 31
UNITED AIRLINES: Says Around 36,000 Workers Could Be Furloughed

UNITED STATES CELLULAR: S&P Rates New Senior Notes to 'BB'
UNITI GROUP: Reports $588.2 Million Net Loss for Second Quarter
UTEX INDUSTRIES: S&P Lowers ICR to 'D' on Missed Interest Payment
V.S. INVESTMENT: Has Until Oct. 30 to File Plan & Disclosure
VERITAS US: S&P Rates New $600MM Senior Secured Notes 'B'

VISITING NURSE: American Healthcare Serves as Adviser on Sale
VIVUS INC: Aug. 19 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
WEST ALLEY BBQ: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
WYNDHAM HOTELS: S&P Assigns 'B+' Rating to Senior Unsecured Notes
XENIA HOTELS: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable

YETI INVESTMENT: Sept. 8 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
[*] Antitrust Factors for Bankruptcy Sales
[*] Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Process Common Misconceptions
[*] Household-Name Companies That Filed Bankruptcy Due to Pandemic
[*] Risks to Landlords When Tenants File for Bankruptcy

[*] Smiley Wang-Ekvall Attorneys Named in Lawdragon 500 List
[*] Will Bankruptcies Rise Further Amid COVID-19 Concerns?

                            *********

402-420 METROPOLITAN: Aug. 12 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor 402-420 Metropolitan Ave LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York a motion seeking a
combined hearing to consider final approval of the Debtor's
Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan of
Reorganization.

On July 10, 2020, Judge Carla E. Craig conditionally approved the
Disclosure Statement and ordered that:

   * Aug. 12, 2020 at 2:30 p.m. in 271-C Cadman Plaza East,
Brooklyn, NY 11201 is the Combined Hearing to consider approval of
the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the
Plan.

   * Aug. 5, 2020 is fixed as the last day to file objections to
approval of the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and/or
confirmation of the Plan.

   * Aug. 10, 2020 is fixed as the last day for the Debtor’s
Reply, if any, to an objections received by the Objection Deadline
to the final approval of the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement
and/or confirmation of the Plan.

   * Aug. 5, 2020 is fixed as the last day to submit completed
ballots.

   * Aug. 10, 2020 is fixed as the last day for the Debtor to file
a ballot tabulation and certification of acceptance and rejection
of the Plan.

A copy of the order dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y8j7poxt from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

          Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP
          Attn: Kevin J. Nash, Esq.
          1501 Broadway – 22nd Floor
          New York, NY 10036
          E-mail: KNash@GWFGLaw.com

                    About 402-420 Metropolitan

402-420 Metropolitan Ave LLC is engaged in activities related to
real estate.  402-420 Metropolitan filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 20-41810) on April 1, 2020.  At the time
of filing, the Debtor had $28,906,850 in total assets and
$29,110,233 in total liabilities.  Kevin J. Nash, Esq., of GOLDBERG
WEPRIN FINKEL GOLDSTEIN LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


AEROCENTURY CORP: Has $10.2M Net Loss for Quarter Ended March 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
AeroCentury Corp. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $10,178,400 on $4,777,200 of revenues and
other income for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to
a net loss of $1,308,200 on $7,566,900 of revenues and other income
for the same period in 2019.

At March 31, 2020, the Company had total assets of $135,922,900,
total liabilities of $122,259,000, and $13,663,900 in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company was in default under its MUFG Credit Facility as of
December 31, 2019 and March 31, 2020.

On May 1, 2020, the Company and the MUFG Credit Facility Lenders
("MUFG Lenders") executed an amendment to the MUFG Credit Facility
(as amended, the "MUFG Loan Agreement") to convert the MUFG Credit
Facility into a term loan facility (as converted, the "MUFG Loan").
The amendment includes certain requirements and establishment of
deadlines for achievement of milestones toward execution of Company
strategic alternatives for the Company and/or its assets that would
enable repayment of the MUFG Loan Agreement indebtedness.

The MUFG Lenders have the right to exercise any and all remedies
for default under the MUFG Loan Agreement.  Such remedies include,
but are not limited to, declaring the entire indebtedness
immediately due and payable and, if the Company were unable to
repay such accelerated indebtedness, foreclosing upon the assets of
the Company that secure the indebtedness under the MUFG Loan (the
"MUFG Indebtedness"), which consist of all of the Company's assets
except for certain assets held in the Company's single asset
special-purpose financing subsidiaries.  The Company is obligated
to pay $3.1 million related to the termination of the MUFG Swaps in
March 2020.  The Company also defaulted on payment under the Nord
Loans.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant cash flow issues for
airlines, and some airlines, including some of the Company's
customers, may be unable to timely meet their obligations under
their lease obligations with the Company unless government
financial support is received, of which there can be no assurance.
Any additional significant nonpayment or late payment of lease
payments by a significant lessee or combination of lessees could in
turn impose limits on the Company's ability to fund its ongoing
operations as well as cause new defaults under the Company's debt
obligations, which in turn could lead to an immediate acceleration
of debt and foreclosure upon the Company's assets.

The Company said, "As a result of these factors, there is
substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.  The condensed consolidated financial statements
presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared
on a going concern basis and do not include any adjustments that
might arise as a result of uncertainties about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                     https://is.gd/2I0FLQ

AeroCentury Corp. is engaged in the business of investing in used
regional aircraft equipment and leasing the equipment to foreign
and domestic regional air carriers.  The Company's principal
business objective is to acquire aircraft assets and manage those
assets in order to provide a return on investment through lease
revenue and, eventually, sale proceeds.  The Company is
headquartered in Burlingame, California.



AGD SYSTEMS: Case Summary & 3 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: AGD Systems Corp
        10130 Northlake Blvd
        Suite 214-243
        West Palm Beach, FL 33412

Business Description: AGD Systems Corp is a registered U.S.
                      Defense Contractor that provides
                      Comprehensive Foreign Military Sales
                      including: aircraft modernization,
                      acquisition, training, logistics and
                      sustainment.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida

Case No.: 20-18695

Judge: Hon. Erik P. Kimball

Debtor's Counsel: Brian K. McMahon, Esq.
                  BRIAN K. MCMAHON
                  1401 Forum Way
                  6th Floor
                  West Palm Beach, FL 33401
                  Tel: 561-478-2500
                  E-mail: briankmcmahon@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Mark Daniels, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's three unsecured creditors, is available at
PacerMonitor at at no extra charge.

                 https://tinyurl.com/y23kp8f7


AGF MACHINERY: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: AGF Machinery, LLC
        1760 Reeves St.
        Dothan, AL 36303

Business Description: AGF Machinery, LLC --
                      https://agfmachinery.com -- is engaged in
                      selling and renting construction equipment,
                      aerial work platforms & heavy duty
                      equipment.  The company offers a full line
                      of construction equipment in its sales and
                      rental inventories from Wacker Neuson, ASV,
                      Skyjack, Toro, and Husqvarna.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Alabama

Case No.: 20-11029

Debtor's Counsel: Edward J. Peterson, Esq.
                  STICHTER, RIEDEL, BLAIN & POSTLER, P.A.
                  110 E. Madison St.
                  Suite 200
                  Tampa, FL 33602
                  Tel: (813) 229-0144
                  Email: epeterson@srbp.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Jeffrey Lee Washington, member.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                   https://tinyurl.com/yyqea5db

List of Debtor's 13 Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Dell Financial                                          $24,732
P.O. Box 81577
Austin, TX 78708-1577

2. Larry and Helen Holcomb                            Undetermined
1497 Coosa County Rd. 78
Sylacauga, AL 35151

3. Michael Butler Broadcasting                              $1,250
P.O. Box 780146
Tallassee, AL 36078

4. Rand-Reilly, LLC                                   Undetermined
Data Proucts
P.O. Box 2029
Tuscaloosa, AL 35403

5. Robert Gardner, Jr.                                Undetermined
514 N. E. Blvd.
Montgomery, AL 36117

6. South Hood, LLC                                    Undetermined
165 East University Drive
Auburn, AL 36830

7. Ricky Spratlin                                     Undetermined
990 Mahone Barnett Rd.
Tuskegee, AL 36083

8. Susan Y. Hardwick                                  Undetermined
1981 Highway 87 S
Navarre, FL 32566

9. Synovus Bank                                           $683,237
1148 Broadway, 4th Floor
W Suite
Columbus, GA 31901

10. Tiger Tire & Auto                                       $4,745
1994 Lee Road 137
Auburn, AL 36832

11. Trackunit                                              $26,437
700 Commerce Dr., #500
Oak Brook, IL 60523

12. USMD, LLC                                         Undetermined
7366 Gulf Blvd.
Navarre, FL 32566

13. WMJSHR Investments, LLC                           Undetermined
P.O. Box 1207
Dothan, AL 36302


AGILE THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $10.8M Net Loss in Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Agile Therapeutics, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss
of $10.83 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020,
compared to a net loss of $3.48 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2019.

For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company reported a net
loss of $18.71 million compared to a net loss of $8.15 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2019.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $103.06 million in total
assets, $22.27 million in total liabilities, and $80.79 million in
total stockholders' equity.

"Thanks to the dedication and commitment of the Agile team, we made
considerable progress on our objectives and we believe we are on
track to launch Twirla in the fourth quarter of 2020. During the
second quarter, we transitioned into the final validation phase of
manufacturing commercial product.  Through Syneos Selling
Solutions, our contract sales force partner, we also hired several
industry veterans to build out our sales force highlighted by Terry
Herring, a recognized leader with more than 30 years of
pharmaceutical and healthcare experience, as our new National Sales
Leader.  We believe our strong financial position and cash balance,
combined with our recent achievements, set us up well to
commercially launch Twirla and establish Agile in the contraceptive
prescription marketplace," said Al Altomari, chairman and chief
executive officer of Agile.

As of June 30, 2020, Agile had $87.2 million of cash, cash
equivalents and marketable securities compared to $34.5 million of
cash and cash equivalents as of Dec. 31, 2019.

Research and development expenses were $3.7 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2020, compared to $1.8 million for the comparable
period in 2019.  The increase in R&D expenses was primarily due to
costs to complete manufacturing development, process improvements,
and pre-validation work for commercial manufacturing of Twirla by
Corium, the Company's contract manufacturer.

General and administrative expenses were $6.4 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2020, compared to $1.8 million for the
comparable period in 2019.  The increase in G&A expenses was
primarily due to higher costs associated with the Company's
pre-commercialization activities for Twirla, such as brand
building, advocacy, market research and consulting.  The increase
in G&A expenses was also attributable to activities related to
building out the commercial organization and included higher
salaries and higher professional fees related to recruiting fees
and consultants, and an increase in stock compensation expense.

Financial Guidance

   * The Company reaffirmed its operating expense guidance for
     the full year 2020 to be in the range of $52 million to $56
     million, with general and administrative expenses accounting
     for approximately 70% of the spending as it builds out its
     commercial infrastructure.  The Company's operating expenses
     guidance includes $2.5 million to $3 million of non-cash
     stock compensation expense.  The Company updated its net
     revenue guidance in the fourth quarter of 2020, reflecting
     refined expectations of initial stocking levels, to be in
     the range of $1 million to $2 million.

   * Based on the Company's current business plan and ability to
     launch Twirla, the Company believes that its cash, cash
     equivalents and marketable securities as of June 30, 2020
     will be sufficient to meet its projected operating
     requirements through the end of 2021.  If the COVID-19
     pandemic or other factors impact the Company's current
     business plans or its ability to generate revenue from the
     launch of Twirla, the Company believes it has the ability to
     revise its commercial plans, including curtailing sales and
     marketing spending, to allow it to continue to fund its
     operations.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                  https://tinyurl.com/yy387k45

                    About Agile Therapeutics

Agile Therapeutics, headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey --
http://www.agiletherapeutics.com-- is a forward-thinking women's
healthcare company dedicated to fulfilling the unmet health needs
of today's women.  The Company's product candidates are designed to
provide women with contraceptive options that offer freedom from
taking a daily pill, without committing to a longer-acting method.
Its lead product candidate, Twirla, (ethinyl estradiol and
levonorgestrel transdermal system), also known as AG200-15, is a
once-weekly prescription contraceptive patch that has completed
Phase 3 trials.

Agile recorded a net loss of $18.61 million in 2019, a net loss of
$19.78 million in 2018, and a net loss of $28.30 million in 2017.
As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $49.54 million in total
assets, $3.79 million in total liabilities, and $45.74 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Iselin, New Jersey, the Company's auditor
since 2010, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Feb. 20, 2020 citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations, requires additional capital to fund its
commercialization activities and has stated that substantial doubt
exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


ALPINE 4 TECHNOLOGIES: MaloneBailey LLP Raises Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------------
Alpine 4 Technologies Ltd. filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a
net loss of $3,133,165 on $ 28,151,524  of revenue for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $7,908,017 on $
14,261,794  of revenue for the year ended in 2018.

The audit report of MaloneBailey, LLP states that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency that raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2019, showed total assets
of $35,801,598, total liabilities of $47,771,740, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $11,970,142.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/QgmlBh

Alpine 4 Technologies Ltd., a technology holding company, provides
automotive technologies, electronics manufacturing, software, and
energy services in the United States.  The Company's product and
services include 6th Sense Auto and BrakeActive.  The Company was
formerly known as Alpine 4 Automotive Technologies Ltd. and changed
its name to Alpine 4 Technologies Ltd. in June 2015. Alpine 4
Technologies Ltd. was founded in 2014 and is based in Phoenix,
Arizona.



AMERICAN BLUE: Unsecureds to Get Paid from GUC Plan Consideration
-----------------------------------------------------------------
American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC and its affiliates filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a Combined
Disclosure Statement and Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated
July 10, 2020.

On June 12, 2020, the Debtors filed a Motion for Entry of Order
Approving the Sale of Certain of the Debtors Assets Free and Clear
of All Liens, Claims, Encumbrances, and Other Interests and
Authorizing the Assumption and Assignment of Unexpired Leases,
wherein the Debtors sought Bankruptcy Court approval of the Florida
Purchase Agreement.

Class 3 General Unsecured Claims are impaired.  Holders of Allowed
General Unsecured Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject
the Plan.  Holders of allowed general unsecured claims will receive
a pro rata share of the GUC Plan Consideration.

Class 4 consists of the Equity Interests in the Debtors. On the
Effective Date, Equity Interests shall be discharged, cancelled,
released, and extinguished as of the Effective Date and Holders of
Equity Interests shall neither receive any Distributions nor retain
any property under this Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan for
or on account of such Equity Interests.

The Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan provides for the limited
substantive consolidation of the Debtors' Estates, but solely for
the purposes of this Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan,
including voting on the Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan by
the holders of claims and making any distributions to holders of
claims.

Allowed claims will be paid by the Reorganized Debtors, subject to
the limitations and qualifications.  On the Effective Date, the
Reorganized Debtors will establish the GUC Trust Account for the
benefit of the Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims, from
which all payments to holders of allowed general unsecured claims
will be made.

If the Debtors consummate a sale of Legendary Baking prior to
payment of the final GUC Fixed Cash Recovery payment, the proceeds
from the sale of Legendary Baking will be used to satisfy the
remaining amounts due to Holders of Allowed General Unsecured
Claims in connection with the GUC Fixed Cash Recovery in one lump
sum payment on the next Distribution Date.

The 100% of the New Equity Interests in the Reorganized Debtors
shall be disbursed to Cannae in partial repayment of the DIP Loan
pursuant to the Debt-For-Equity Exchange.  The value of such New
Equity Interests to be applied to the repayment of the DIP Loan
shall be $15,500,000.

A full-text copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement
dated July 10, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/ybscq5vv
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Co-Counsel to the Debtors:

         NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP
         Shane G. Ramsey
         John T. Baxter
         150 Fourth Avenue, North, Suite 1100
         Nashville, TN 37219
         Tel: (615) 664-5355
         Fax: (615) 664-5399
         E-mail: shane.ramsey@nelsonmullins.com
                 john.baxter@nelsonmullins.com

                - and –

         B. Keith Poston
         1320 Main Street
         Columbia, SC 29201
         Phone: (803) 255-9518
         Facsimile: (803) 255-9038
         E-mail: keith.poston@nelsonmullins.com

                - and –

         BAYARD, P.A.
         Evan T. Miller
         Daniel N. Brogan
         Sophie E. Macon
         600 N. King Street, Suite 400
         Wilmington, DE 19801
         Telephone: (302) 655-5000
         Facsimile: (302) 658-6395
         E-mail: emiller@bayardlaw.com
                 dbrogan@bayardlaw.com
                 smacon@bayardlaw.com

                    About American Blue Ribbon

Based in Nashville, Tennessee, American Blue Ribbon Holdings, LLC--
http://www.americanblueribbonholdings.com/-- operates two distinct
regional family dining restaurant brands -- Village Inn and Bakers
Square, as well as a bakery operation, Legendary Baking. Founded in
1958 and 1969, respectively, Village Inn and Bakers Square are
full-service sit-down family dining restaurant concepts that
feature a variety of menu items for all meal periods.  As of the
Petition Date, in connection with the family dining business, the
Debtors operate 97 restaurants in 13 states, franchise 84 Village
Inn restaurants, and maintain an e-commerce presence as well.
Legendary Baking is the Debtors' manufacturing operation that
produces pies in two Debtor-owned production facilities. Legendary
Baking provides those pies to the Family Dining Business for sale
in Village Inn and Bakers Square restaurants while also selling
pies to other restaurants, independent bakers, and customers.

American Blue Ribbon Holdings and four affiliates, namely (1)
Legendary Baking, LLC, (2) Legendary Baking Holdings, LLC, (3)
Legendary Baking of California, LLC, and (4) SVCC, LLC, each filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 20-10161) on
Jan. 27, 2020.

As of the Petition Date, American Blue Ribbon Holdings estimated
between $100 million and $500 million in assets and between $50
million and $100 million in liabilities.  The petitions were signed
by Kurt Schnaubelt, chief financial officer.

Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein is assigned to the cases.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP and KTBS LAW LLP serve as the
Debtors' counsel.  Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC is the
Debtors' claims and noticing agent.


ANGI GROUP: Moody's Assigns First-Time Ba3 CFR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned to ANGI Group, LLC a Ba3
Corporate Family Rating and Ba3-PD Probability of Default Rating.
Concurrently, Moody's assigned a Ba3 rating to ANGI Group's
proposed $500 million senior unsecured notes and SGL-1 Speculative
Grade Liquidity rating. The outlook is stable.

Moody's also withdrew IAC/InterActiveCorp's Ba2 Corporate Family
Rating, Ba2-PD Probability of Default Rating, SGL-1 rating and
stable outlook given that IAC is no longer an issuer of rated debt.
ANGI Group is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ANGI Homeservices Inc.,
which, in turn, is 85%-owned by parent, IAC.

Net proceeds from the debt raise will be used for general corporate
purposes, including potential future acquisitions and return of
capital. The ANGI notes will be unsecured debt instruments
guaranteed by ANGI's material domestic operating subsidiaries. The
notes will not benefit from a downstream IAC guarantee, similar to
the existing debt residing at ANGI.

Pro forma for the new notes, ANGI's outstanding debt as of June 30,
2020 will total $740.6 million consisting of: (i) an undrawn $250
million revolving credit facility maturing 2023 (unrated); (ii) a
$240.6 million outstanding term loan A maturing 2023 (unrated); and
(iii) the new $500 million senior unsecured notes due 2028.

Assignments:

Issuer: ANGI Group, LLC

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned Ba3

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned Ba3-PD

$500 Million Senior Unsecured Notes due 2028, Assigned Ba3 (LGD4)

Withdrawals:

Issuer: IAC/InterActiveCorp

Corporate Family Rating, Withdrawn, previously rated Ba2

Probability of Default Rating, Withdrawn, previously rated Ba2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Actions:

Issuer: ANGI Group, LLC

Speculative Grade Liquidity, Assigned SGL-1

Issuer: IAC/InterActiveCorp

Speculative Grade Liquidity, Changed to Rating Withdrawn from
SGL-1

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: ANGI Group, LLC

Outlook, Assigned, Stable

Issuer: IAC/InterActiveCorp

Outlook, Changed to Rating Withdrawn from Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

ANGI's Ba3 CFR benefits from the company's position as the leading
player in the high growth on-demand home remodeling, repair and
maintenance space, an estimated $500 billion market in the US.

The rating is supported by: (i) the potential for long-term growth
given that the marketplace is relatively underpenetrated; (ii)
ANGI's B2C online content delivery expertise reinforced by an
effective technology platform; (iii) good customer loyalty with
improving take rates; (iv) solid EBITDA and free cash flow
generation characteristics; (v) and very strong liquidity. The
rating is challenged by the company's high pro forma financial
leverage, small scale, narrow business line, high geographic
concentration and low margin profile.

Helping to offset these constraints is the parent's long and
successful track record of acquiring, cultivating, growing and
scaling its businesses to profitability in a disciplined and
cost-effective manner, which Moody's believes will continue while
ANGI remains majority owned by IAC. Though IAC is not a guarantor
of ANGI's debt, Moody's expects IAC will provide implicit financial
support to the company, if needed, given that ANGI represents IAC's
largest investment and accounts for more than 75% of IAC's pro
forma EBITDA (excluding corporate overhead) following the recent
spin-off of Match Group, Inc.

As one of the early movers in the industry dating back to IAC's
initial 2004 investment in Service Magic (later rebranded as Home
Advisor), ANGI has grown organically and through several
acquisitions to become the premier digital home services
marketplace that connects homeowners with service professionals.

Secular growth potential exists for the online home services market
given the: (i) increasing number of consumers using the internet to
find qualified and vetted service professionals for home projects;
(ii) growing number of US service professionals shifting their
businesses and advertising digitally; and (iii) highly
underpenetrated nature of the home services market with only about
20% of home projects fulfilled via an online inquiry or lead. ANGI
benefits from strong customer loyalty, which is facilitated by
transparent upfront pricing for a large variety of projects, in-app
scheduling and payment, and guaranteed service levels.

ANGI has experienced consistent double-digit organic revenue growth
in recent years, partly driven by its user-friendly app, which is a
function of the company's strong B2C online content delivery model
that emphasizes a frictionless consumer experience, a capability
inherited from its parent, IAC. While acquisitions over the years
helped to add operating and international scale, IAC has
effectively leveraged ANGI's technology infrastructure for acquired
companies to lower customer acquisition costs. Marketing and sales,
however, are managed independently at the country level and each
acquired company maintains its own brand identity.

The rating considers Moody's expectation for subdued revenue growth
in 2020 in the mid-to-high single digit range, primarily arising
from the economic impact of the novel coronavirus, as well as
suppressed margins due to continued spending on discretionary
investments and marketing to supplement ANGI's offering with more
services and grow market share. The growth strategy is to promote
higher priced projects with greater monetization value and provide
new services such as project financing, bundled tasks and
subscription plans to homeowners. While these investments will
pressure EBITDA margins over the near-term, Moody's expects they
will lead to increased revenue growth and expanding margins over
the long-term as take rates improve.

The Ba3 rating is constrained by ANGI's high financial leverage.
Pro forma for the note's issuance, ANGI's gross debt will triple to
approximately $741 million as of June 30, 2020 and total debt to
EBITDA will rise to around 6.8x from 3x (including Moody's standard
adjustments for non-cash stock-based compensation expense (SBC),
operating leases and purchase obligation commitments). While
leverage appears high for the Ba3 category, an offsetting factor is
ANGI's very good internal liquidity profile.

Pro forma cash balances of roughly $920 million (includes net
proceeds from the pending debt raise) will exceed gross debt,
producing a net cash position. Further, Moody's expects continued
strong conversion of EBITDA to free cash flow and project FCF in
the range of $100 - $150 million in 2020 (FCF was approximately
$185 million at LTM June 30, 2020), increasing to about $150 - $175
million over the next twelve months.

Given that ANGI's "asset-lite" operating model facilitates robust
free cash flow, supporting very good liquidity, Moody's expects the
company will focus on deleveraging. As such, the Ba3 CFR is
forward-looking and Moody's projects leverage will decline to the
3.5x-4x range by 2022 through a combination of debt reduction,
organic EBITDA growth and incremental EBITDA from acquisitions.
Liquidity is supplemented by a $250 million RCF that Moody's
expects will remain undrawn.

ANGI's scale as measured by revenue of approximately $1.4 billion
is lower than many comparably rated companies. However, given the
strong secular growth potential in the homes services market and
the likelihood that the company will continue to make acquisitions,
Moody's projects that revenue will approach $2 billion by 2022.
Revenue concentration in the home services market constrains the
rating because the business is sensitive to economic events and can
be adversely impacted by consumer confidence, discretionary
spending and access to credit.

Additionally, about 95% of revenue is generated in North America.
The absence of meaningful international diversification exposes
ANGI to the economic and cyclical conditions of only one region,
which could magnify EBITDA and cash flow volatility during economic
cycles. ANGI's EBITDA margin profile in the 8%-10% range (Moody's
adjusted) weighs on the rating since lower margins provide less
cushion during periods of underperformance as well as reduced
capacity to reinvest in the business and convert EBITDA to free
cash flow.

Further, ANGI is exposed to digital advertising revenue, which can
be cyclical and experience commoditized pricing in certain
categories or weak pricing during downturns. The rating also
reflects potential declines in website traffic due to rapidly
changing technology and industry standards, changes in approaches
for content delivery and distribution as well as sudden changes in
how consumers engage with media content over time.

ANGI is exposed to possible revisions to Google's search engine
algorithms that could minimize its websites' listings placements
and weaken paid traffic results. Concentrated ownership from the
large 98% voting stake of IAC, which, in turn, is controlled by Mr.
Barry Diller, and historically shareholder-friendly financial
policies of IAC heightens governance risk.

However, given that ANGI is IAC's largest investment and
contributes a significant amount of IAC's earnings, Moody's
believes IAC will act as a prudent steward to efficiently allocate
capital for growth initiatives and return of capital to
shareholders.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that ANGI will continue to
experience strong growth, albeit subdued in 2020. The outlook also
incorporates Moody's expectation that the company will maintain a
consolidated EBITDA margin in the 8%-10% area (Moody's adjusted),
generate positive free cash flow and retain a sizeable cash balance
in excess of gross debt as it pursues strategic growth objectives.
The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that ANGI's web-based B2C
content delivery and services model will remain fairly resilient
during the COVID-19 outbreak and economic recession as consumers
increasingly shift their activities, media consumption and
purchases online.

Nonetheless, Moody's expects decreases in consumer demand for home
services requests to have an impact ANGI as some consumers may be
unwilling to interact with service professionals face-to-face or
have service professionals in their home. Moody's also expects
lower advertising spend by clients will negatively impact
advertising rates in the ad-supported segment of the business.
Further, with the global economy in recession this year combined
with the prospect of extended business closures, layoffs and high
rates of unemployment, an erosion of consumer confidence will lead
to a reduction in discretionary consumption.

The magnitude of the impact will depend on the depth and duration
of the pandemic, the impact that government restrictions to curb
the virus will have on consumer behavior and the pace of business
re-openings. As a result, Moody's expects delayed de-leveraging in
2020 with leverage remaining high near 7x (Moody's adjusted,
including SBC) due to moderating EBITDA and then declining in 2021
to around 5x as the economy recovers, which is factored in the
stable outlook. Moody's projects a global economic recession this
year with the US and G-20 advanced economies contracting 5.7% and
6.4%, respectively, followed by rebounding growth of 4.5% and 4.8%
in 2021.

The rapid spread of the coronavirus outbreak, deteriorating global
economic outlook, low oil prices, and high asset price volatility
have created an unprecedented credit shock across a range of
sectors and regions. Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a
social risk under its ESG framework, given the substantial
implications for public health and safety.

ANGI's credit profile reflects the impact of the outbreak on its
profitability given its exposure to the US economy and consumer
spending, which has left it vulnerable to government lockdown
mandates and shifts in market demand and sentiment in these
unprecedented operating conditions.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

A ratings upgrade is unlikely over the near-term given the
expectation for weak debt protection measures for the rating
category. Over time, an upgrade could occur if ANGI exhibits
revenue growth that is in line or ahead of market growth, expanding
EBITDA margins and improved business and geographic diversification
through increased scale and profitability.

An upgrade would also be considered if financial leverage as
measured by total debt to EBITDA is sustained near 3.5x (Moody's
adjusted, including SBC) and free cash flow as a percentage of
total debt is sustained at or above 6% (Moody's adjusted). ANGI
would also need to adhere to conservative financial policies with
respect to share purchases and dividends to be considered for
upward ratings pressure.

Ratings could be downgraded if ANGI's competitive position were to
weaken as evidenced by revenue declines of 5% or more, EBITDA
margins sustained below 10% (Moody's adjusted), rising traffic
acquisition costs or increasing customer churn. Ratings could
experience downward pressure if total debt to EBITDA is sustained
above 5x (Moody's adjusted, including SBC) beyond 2021.

A downgrade could also arise if ANGI sustained higher total debt to
EBITDA than Moody's base-case expectation or liquidity deteriorates
significantly due to lower-than-expected free cash flow generation
or cash levels weakened due to high share purchase activity or
increased acquisition spend without a proportionate increase in
EBITDA.

Headquartered in Denver, CO, ANGI Homeservices Inc. is a leading
online marketplace for home remodeling, repair and maintenance that
connects quality service professionals with consumers. Major brands
include HomeAdvisor, Angie's List, Handy and Fixd Repair. The
company is 85%-owned by IAC/InterActiveCorp, a leading consumer
media and internet company that owns more than 150 internet-based
brands and products. ANGI's revenue totaled approximately $1.4
billion for the twelve months ended June 30, 2020.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Media Industry
published in June 2017.


APC AUTOMOTIVE: Joint Prepackaged Plan Confirmed by Judge
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher S. Sontchi has entered findings of fact,
conclusions of law and order confirming the First Amended Joint
Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of APC Automotive
Technologies Intermediate Holdings, LLC and Its Debtor Affiliates.

The Debtors have met their burden of proving that the Plan complies
with each element of Sections 1129(a) and, to the extent
applicable, if any, 1129(b) of the Bankruptcy Code by a
preponderance of the evidence.

The Debtors have agreed in principle to the terms of a settlement
(the "DOJ Settlement") with the U.S. Department of Justice (the
"DOJ") regarding a civil investigation by DOJ and CBP and related
whistleblower litigation under the False Claims Act pertaining to
the classification of certain brake material imported under the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

A copy of the order dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y89pgbvc from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                      About APC Automotive

APC Automotive Technologies Intermediate Holdings, LLC, is an
aftermarket supplier of brake, chassis, exhaust, and emissions
parts for passenger vehicles, trucks, and commercial vehicles.  It
was formed through the merger of two companies in 2017, AP Exhaust
and Centric.

APC Automotive Technologies Intermediate Holdings, LLC and its 13
affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 20-11466) on June 3, 2020.

Templar Energy was estimated to have $100 million to $500 million
in assets and $500 million to $1 billion in liabilities.

Jonathan S. Henes, P.C., of Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland &
Ellis International LLP, serves as the Debtors' general bankruptcy
counsel; Domenic E. Pacitti, Esq., Morton R. Branzburg, Esq., and
Michael W. Yurkewicz, Esq. of Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP
serve as the local bankruptcy counsel.  Jefferies Group LLC acts as
the Company's financial advisor and Weinsweigadvisors LLC as
restructuring advisor.  Ernst & Young LLP is acting as the
Company's tax advisor; and Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc.,
serves as the Company's claims and notice agent.


ARR INVESTMENTS: Unsecureds to Receive Payment from Equity Pool
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors ARR Investments, Inc., ARR Childcare, Inc., and Arista
Academy, Inc., filed a Third Amended Disclosure Statement
describing their proposed Chapter 11 Plan dated July 10, 2020.

Class 14 consists of General Unsecured Claims of ARR Investments,
Inc. (14a), Arista Academy, Inc. (14b), and ARR Childcare, Inc.
(14c).  The actual dividend will vary between Classes 14a, 14b, and
14c depending on the total number of allowed claims and the Equity
Pool value for each of the Debtors, but the methodology is the same
for all of Class 14.  Holders of Allowed Class 14 Unsecured Claims
for each of the Debtors will be entitled to a pro rata share of the
Equity Pool for their respective Debtor paid over a 30-year
amortization with a 15-year maturity and interest at 4.5 percent.
The Equity Pool for each Debtor will be determined based on the
liquidation equity value of the particular Debtor's assets.

The Debtor estimates that the value of the Equity Pool for the
Debtors will be between $429,129 and 300,000 for ARR Investments,
between $389,000 and $280,000 for Arista, and between $769,573 and
600,000 for ARR Childcare, but has not yet finalized its analysis.


Class 15 interests will be cancelled.

On the Effective Date, Mr. Alejandrino Rodriguez and his wife, Ms.
Mabel Diaz will contribute $50,000 to the Debtors to be used by the
Debtors for ongoing obligations of the Debtors including legal and
professional expenses, operations, and/or Plan payments.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement dated
July 10, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yd7aaxgo from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtors are represented by:

         Jimmy D. Parrish
         BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP
         200 S. Orange Avenue
         SunTrust Center, Suite 2300
         Orlando, Florida 32801
         Tel: (407) 649-4000
         Fax: (407)841-0168
         E-mail: jparrish@bakerlaw.com

                     About ARR Investments

ARR Investments, Inc., and its subsidiaries --
http://www.arr-learningcenters.com/-- offer learning centers for
infants, toddlers, preschoolers and Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten in
Orlando, Florida. The Learning Centers provide computer labs;
dance, yoga, music classes; aerobics; foreign language instruction;
before/after school transportation; certified lifeguard and safety
instructor for swim lessons and play; and mini-camp breaks and
summer camp.
  
ARR Investments and three of its subsidiaries filed voluntary
petitions seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 19-01494) on March 8, 2019.
The petitions were signed by Alejandrino Rodriguez, president.  At
the time of filing, the Debtors were estimated to have under $10
million in both assets and liabilities.  Jimmy D. Parrish, Esq., at
Baker & Hostetler LLP, serves as the Debtors' counsel.


ASCENA RETAIL: To Report Significant Loss in Fiscal Q4
------------------------------------------------------
Ascena Retail Group, Inc., said in a regulatory filing it announced
preliminary results for its fiscal fourth quarter ended Aug. 1,
2020.  The estimated 2020 fourth quarter information is subject to
the completion of the Company’s standard procedures for the
preparation and completion of its annual financial statements.
Given that these reviews are ongoing, the Company may make further
adjustments as a result of developments occurring between now and
the time the financial results are finalized and publicly filed on
Form 10-K.  The estimated sales data has been provided to help
investors understand and assess the near-term impacts of the
coronavirus pandemic, but is subject to variability and may not be
indicative of results or trends for any future reporting period.

The Company currently estimates that revenue for its 2020 fiscal
fourth quarter will be in the range of $765 million to $785
million, down from $1.228 billion in the fiscal fourth quarter of
the prior year.  The Company saw improving negative comparable
sales performance as the quarter progressed.  As a result of the
sales decline, the Company expects to report a significant
operating loss for the 2020 fiscal fourth quarter.

From a liquidity standpoint, the Company currently estimates that
it will report cash and cash equivalents as of August 1, 2020 in
the range of $580 million to $590 million.  Additionally, the
Company ended the fourth quarter with outstanding term loan debt of
$1.272 billion and outstanding borrowings under its revolving
credit agreement of $230 million.  The Company's cash and debt may
ultimately be impacted by the Company's July 23, 2020 bankruptcy
filing, which is discussed in more detail in Note 21 to its current
report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 2, 2020 (the
"Third Quarter 2020 Form 10-Q").

The revenue data for the three months ended Aug> 1, 2020 and the
cash and debt balances as of Aug. 1, 2020 are preliminary and have
been prepared on the basis of currently available information. The
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm has not
audited or reviewed, and does not express an opinion or any other
form of assurance with respect to, this data. This data does not
constitute a comprehensive statement of the Company's financial
results for the three months and fiscal year ended August 1, 2020,
and the Company's final numbers for this data may differ materially
from these estimates.

                   About Ascena Retail Group

Ascena Retail Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: ASNA) --
http://www.ascenaretail.com/-- is a national specialty retailer
offering apparel, shoes, and accessories for women under the
Premium Fashion (Ann Taylor, LOFT, and Lou & Grey), Plus Fashion
(Lane Bryant, Catherines and Cacique), and Value Fashion
(Dressbarn) segments, and for tween girls under the Kids Fashion
segment (Justice).  Ascena, through its retail brands, operates
ecommerce websites and approximately 2,800 stores throughout the
United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico.

Ascena Retail reported a net loss of $661.4 million for the fiscal
year ended Aug. 3, 2019, a net loss of $39.7 million for the year
ended Aug. 4, 2018, and a net loss of $1.06 billion for the year
ended July 29, 2017.

On July 23, 2020, Ascena Retail Group and its affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 20-33113).  As of
Feb. 1, 2020, Ascena Retail had $13,690,710,379 in assets and
$12,516,261,149 in total liabilities.

The Hon. Kevin R. Huennekens is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Cooley LLP as
bankruptcy counsel, Guggenheim Securities, LLC as financial
Advisor, and Alvarez and Marsal North America, LLC as
restructuring
advisor.  Prime Clerk, LLC is the claims agent.


ASSOCIATED MATERIALS: Moody's Rates $250MM Secured Notes 'B3'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 rating to the prospective
$250 million senior secured notes issuance of Associated Materials,
LLC. In addition, Moody's assigned a B3 corporate family rating and
B3-PD probability of default rating to Associated Materials. The
outlook is stable.

The notes issuance is part of a larger recapitalization of
Associated Materials, whereby most of the holders of the company's
existing $675 million 9% senior secured notes will receive $25
million in cash plus equity in the company in exchange for their
notes. The proceeds from the new $250 million notes offering will
be used to fund the cash portion of the exchange, pay down the
existing balance on the company's ABL revolving facility, fund
closing costs as well as for general corporate purposes. As of June
30, 2020, the company had $152 million drawn on the revolver.
Following the completion of the restructuring transactions, the
company expects to downsize its ABL facility commitment to $150
million and extend the maturity to 2024.

Assignments:

Issuer: Associated Materials, LLC

Corporate Family Rating at B3

Probability of Default Rating at B3-PD

Senior Secured Notes due 2025 at B3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Associated Materials, LLC

Outlook assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Associated Materials' B3 corporate family and senior secured
ratings reflect Moody's expectation that the company will
experience margin contraction coupled with a decline in revenue in
2020, followed by a gradual recovery in 2021. Moody's forecast
considers lower home construction activity and a reduced need for
discretionary items such as vinyl windows and siding, Associated
Materials' primary products, amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

The rapid spread of the coronavirus outbreak, deteriorating global
economic outlook, low oil prices, and high asset price volatility
have created an unprecedented credit shock across a range of
sectors and regions. Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a
social risk under its ESG framework, given the substantial
implications for public health and safety.

Moody's ratings also reflect the significant competitive landscape
Associated Materials operates in, which limits the company's
pricing power.

However, the ratings are supported by the company's broad
manufacturing and distribution footprint across the US and Canada,
diverse customer base and extensive offering of exterior home
products. Furthermore, the ratings incorporate the strong
fundamentals that support the repair and remodel category, which
makes up roughly 70% of Associated Materials' sales, including low
mortgage interest rates and limited housing supply relative to
demand. Proforma for the secured notes issuance, Associated
Materials will have leverage, as defined by debt/EBITDA, of 4.2x.

Moody's expects that the company will maintain a measured approach
to its financial policy and not aggressively increase leverage.
Following the recapitalization transactions, the new shareholders
of the company will also be creditors participating in the new
secured notes offering and have significant board representation.
This dynamic should help to mitigate the inherent conflict of
balancing the needs of debt and equity holders.

Moody's regards Associated Materials' liquidity as adequate over
the next 12 to 18 months. Associated Materials' proforma cash
position of $68 million will more than cover the company's expected
negative free cash flow while the undrawn and fully available $150
million ABL revolver will provide additional liquidity.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that the company
will see demand improvement in the repair and remodel segment and
maintain adequate liquidity.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Moody's indicated that a rating upgrade would likely reflect
maintenance of debt/EBITDA below 5.0x, an improvement in
EBITA/interest expense closer to 2.5x and improved liquidity,
including sustained generation of positive cash flow. A rating
downgrade could result from debt/EBITDA increasing above 6.0x,
interest coverage sustained below 1.5x or a deterioration in the
company's liquidity profile.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was the
Manufacturing Methodology published in March 2020.

Associated Materials, LLC, headquartered in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio,
is a North American manufacturer and distributor of exterior
building products. The company's core products are vinyl windows
and vinyl siding. Associated Materials is also a distributor of
third-party products, mainly roofing materials, insulation and
exterior doors. Revenue for the twelve months ended March 28, 2020
was about $1.3 billion. Associated Materials is privately owned and
does not disclose its financial information publicly.


BALL CORP: S&P Rates New $1BB Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB+'
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level and '3' recovery
ratings to Ball Corp.'s proposed $1 billion senior unsecured notes
due 2030. The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in the event
of a default. The company intends to use the net proceeds from this
offering to repay outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit
facilities and for general corporate purposes, which may include
potential investments in strategic partnerships and acquisitions,
the repurchase or redemption of debt, including its $750 million
senior unsecured notes due 2022, working capital, share
repurchases, pension contributions, or capital expenditures. The
exact terms and timing of the offering will depend upon market
conditions and other factors.

Ball also entered into an amended credit agreement which, among
other things, modified its financial covenant. The amendment
increases its required maximum net leverage ratio to 5.0x from 4.5x
through Sept. 30, 2022.

"The transaction does not affect our 'BB+' issuer credit rating or
our stable outlook on Ball. We view the proposed refinancing as
leverage neutral and forecast Ball's credit measures will remain
appropriate for the current rating. Ball is a global supplier of
aluminum packaging for customers in the beverage, food, and
household products markets, and also provides aerospace and other
technologies and services, primarily for the U.S. government. Our
rating incorporates the company's strong competitive position, with
a market-leading position in metal beverage containers, diversified
global manufacturing footprint, efficient operations supported by
synergies from prior acquisitions, and solid free cash flow
generation," S&P said.

Issue Ratings--Recovery Analysis

Key analytical factors

-- S&P recognize the collateral package for the stock-secured
facility is somewhat weak because the lenders only have a lien on
subsidiary stock while all domestic entities are borrowers or
guarantors for the company's secured and unsecured debt. Therefore,
domestic borrowings under the credit facility do not have a
priority claim on the value of the U.S. operations relative to
unsecured creditors in the U.S.

- Despite this weakness in the collateral package, domestic
borrowings under the credit facility have a priority claim on 65%
of the equity value in the foreign subsidiaries and direct
borrowings by foreign subsidiaries are structurally senior to the
foreign enterprise value and also benefit from a 100% pledge of the
stock in the foreign subsidiaries.

-- S&P assumes revolver borrowings by foreign subsidiaries of $441
million. A collection allocation mechanism would equalize recovery
rates for all bank borrowing, despite the better guarantor and
collateral terms for non-U.S. borrowings.

-- Using these assumptions, S&P estimates the collateral covers
90% of the secured facility. The large proportion of unpledged
value would be sufficient to provide 50% coverage of the unsecured
claims, including the notes and deficiency claim on the secured
loan. The secured lenders' share of the unpledged value (from the
deficiency claim) would push their total recovery to 95%.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Simulated year of default: 2025
-- EBITDA multiple: 6.0x
-- EBITDA at emergence: $1.165 billion
-- Jurisdiction: U.S.

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value at default (after 5% administrative
costs): $6.642 billion

-- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 50%/50%

-- Priority claims (Domestic receivables factoring program): $444
million

-- Priority claims (Foreign receivables factoring program): $605
million

-- Value available to secured debt (collateral/noncollateral):
$1.920 billion/$3.673 billion

-- Secured debt claims: $2.117 billion

-- Recovery expectations: 90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%

-- Value available to unsecured debt (collateral/noncollateral):
$0/$3.673 billion

-- Pari passu secured deficiency claims: $197 million

-- Senior unsecured debt claims: $6.873 billion

-- Recovery expectations: 30%-50%; rounded estimate: 50%

Note: Debt amounts include six months of accrued interest that S&P
assumes will be owed at default. Collateral value includes equity
pledges in nonobligors (after priority claims). S&P generally
assumes usage of 85% for cash flow revolvers at default.


BAYLESS PROPERTY: $1M Sale of Marietta Property to Brown Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James R. Sacca of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Georgia authorized Bayless Property Group, LLC's
private sale of the real property located at 1111 Via Bayless,
Marietta, Georgia to Chase Brown for $1,035,000.

The Purchase Agreement, including any amendments, supplements, and
modifications thereto, and all of the terms and conditions therein,
is approved.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.
Upon closing of the Sale, all liens, claims, and encumbrances on
the Property will attach to the proceeds of the Sale to the same
extent, validity, and priority as they existed on the Petition
Date.

WCH, LLC filed a proof of claim asserting a first-position security
interest in the Property in the amount of $671,103 as of June 1,
2020.  The amount is comprised of $568,849 in principal, $15,499 in
interest through June 1, 2020, $87,652 in attorneys’ fees and
$1,327 in late fees.  WCH has credited $2,224 toward its claim for
funds held in escrow for property taxes and insurance that remain
undisbursed and owed to the Debtor.  The Debtor asserts (and WCH
disputes) that it should be credited an additional $3,336 in
undisbursed escrow funds and an additional $10,475 in undisbursed
funds representing various repair hold-backs that were never
disbursed.

At the closing of the Sale, WCH will be paid an amount equal to the
outstanding principal of $568,849, pre-petition interest of
$15,499, post-petition interest at the rate of 8.5% through the
closing date, and late fees, minus the disputed amounts of $10,475
and $3,336 to be held in the Debtor's counsel's escrow account
pending resolution by the parties or further order of the Court.
WCH will also be paid $15,000 at closing representing reasonable
attorneys' fees as part of its secured claim.  WCH may file an
amended unsecured proof of claim for the remaining amount of its
claimed attorneys' fees, subject to objection by any
party-in-interest.

The remaining proceeds of the Sale will remain escrowed until
further order of the Court.

Notwithstanding any rule to the contrary, the provisions of the
Order will be immediately effective and enforceable upon its
entry.
  
                 About Bayless Property Group

Bayless Property Group, LLC, a Georgia-based company, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 20-66871) on June 1,
2020.  At the time of the filing, Debtor had estimated assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between
$500,001 and $1 million.  Debtor is represented by Wiggam & Geer,
LLC.


BAYSIDE WASTE: Wants Until August 14 to File Plan & Disclosure
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Bayside Waste Services, LLC, requests an extension of the
July 15, 2020 Court-ordered deadline to file its plan and
disclosure statement.

The Debtor needs an additional 30 days to prepare its disclosure
statement and plan.  The Debtor has filed a motion to approve
bidding procedures and will be filing a motion to approve the sale
of substantially all of its assets.  The short extension will allow
the plan process to proceed in a similar time frame as the sale
process.  Accordingly, by this Motion, the Debtor requests that
this Court extend the time for filing of its disclosure statement
and plan through and including August 14, 2020.

This Motion is not submitted for purposes of delay, and the Debtor
submits that the relief requested in the Motion will not prejudice
any parties in interest.  The Debtor is not aware of any other
party that may seek to file a plan, but is seeking an extension of
the period to file a plan.

A full-text copy of the Motion dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yanwh8k2 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

        Scott A. Stichter
        Stichter Riedel Blain & Postler, P.A.
        110 East Madison Street, Suite 200
        Tampa, Florida 33602
        Telephone: (813) 229-0144
        E-mail: sstichter@srbp.com

                  About Bayside Waste Services

Bayside Waste Services, LLC, a Tampa, Florida-based provider of
environmental services, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 20-02359), on March 18,
2020.  The petition was signed by Paul J. Simon, its manager. As of
Feb. 29, 2020, the Debtor had $769,198 in total assets and
$1,376,899 in total liabilities.  The Debtor tapped Stichter Riedel
Blain & Postler, P.A., as its counsel.


BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL: Has $3.4M Net Loss for March 31 Quarter
--------------------------------------------------------------
BIO-key International, Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $3,370,282 on $522,485 of revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to a net loss
of $1,803,508 on $551,623 of revenues for the same period in 2019.

At March 31, 2020, the Company had total assets of $3,019,278,
total liabilities of $4,430,299, and $1,411,021 in total
stockholders' deficit.

The Company disclosed that there are conditions that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

The Company has incurred significant losses to date, and at March
31, 2020 had an accumulated deficit of approximately $93 million.
In addition, broad commercial acceptance of the Company's
technology is critical to the Company's success and ability to
generate future revenues.  At March 31, 2020, the Company's total
cash and cash equivalents were approximately $662,000, as compared
to approximately $79,000 at December 31, 2019.

The Company has financed operations in the past through access to
the capital markets by issuing secured and convertible debt
securities, convertible preferred stock, common stock, and through
factoring receivables.  The Company estimates that it currently
requires approximately $525,000 per month to conduct operations, a
monthly amount that it has been unable to achieve consistently
through revenue generation.

If the Company is unable to generate sufficient revenue to meet its
goals, it will need to obtain additional third-party financing to
(i) conduct the sales, marketing and technical support necessary to
execute its plan to substantially grow operations, increase
revenue, and serve a significant customer base; and (ii) provide
working capital.  No assurance can be given that any form of
additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to the
Company, that adequate financing will be obtained by the Company,
in order to meet its needs, or that such financing would not be
dilutive to existing shareholders.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/tYKsrW

BIO-key International, Inc. develops and markets fingerprint
biometric identification and identity verification technologies,
and related identity management and credentialing biometric
hardware and software solutions. BIO-key International, Inc.
markets its products through its sales force, as well as through
distributors, resellers, integrators, value added resellers, and
technology partners. The company was formerly known as SAC
Technologies and changed its name to BIO-key International, Inc. in
2002. BIO-key International was founded in 1993 and is
headquartered in Wall, New Jersey.


BOOZ ALLEN: Moody's Rates Planned $500MM Unsecured Notes 'Ba2'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba2 rating to the planned $500
million senior unsecured notes issuance of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
All other ratings for the company, including the Ba1 corporate
family rating and Ba1-PD probability of default rating, as well as
the Baa3 senior secured bank credit facility ratings and the
existing Ba2 senior unsecured bond ratings, are unaffected.

The speculative grade liquidity rating of SGL-1 and the positive
ratings outlook are also unchanged. Proceeds from the notes
offering will go toward redemption of the company's $350 million
issuance of 5.125% senior unsecured notes due 2025 that will be
called concurrent with placement of the new notes. The excess cash
proceeds from the offering will be retained on the balance sheet
for discretionary purposes.

According to lead analyst Bruce Herskovics, "We view the planned
notes issuance to be in-step with Booz Allen Hamilton's measured
financial policies, including maturity laddering, leverage in the
3x range and a very good liquidity profile." Regarding the family
level rating and the ratings outlook Herskovics added, "The Ba1 CFR
and positive ratings outlook are unaffected by the unsecured notes
issuance and continue to incorporate the success of BAH's business
strategy in recent years, with noteworthy market share gains and
rising scale and market prominence within US defense and
intelligence community services."

The rapid spread of the coronavirus outbreak, a deteriorating
global economic outlook, low oil prices and high asset price
volatility have created an unprecedented credit shock across a
range of sectors and regions. Moody's regards the coronavirus
outbreak as a social risk under its ESG framework, given the
substantial implications for public health and safety. While
defense services contracting has been relatively less affected than
most other sectors, it has not been immune to the adverse impact of
the pandemic, and the company remains vulnerable to shifts in
market demand and sentiment in these unprecedented operating
conditions.

Assignments:

Issuer: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned Ba2 (LGD5)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba1 CFR broadly reflects BAH's size and backlog growth, a
long-held position within US national security services contracting
with good diversity of programs, relatively strong key credit
metrics and generally measured and supportive financial policies.

Market share gains followed BAH's effort to expand technical
qualifications in recent years. The added capabilities well suit
the US defense modernization phase that will continue unfolding
across the next decade. Moody's expects BAH's revenues to exceed $8
billion in FY2021. The scale should enable BAH to shoulder larger
contract/tasks, be innovative as technology evolves, and to
continue offering attractive career development opportunities that
facilitate talent recruitment.

The Ba1 rating also factors in recently increased risk associated
with US defense budget uncertainty, as stimulus spending in
response to the coronavirus crisis could threaten spending growth.
The government's FY2021 will almost surely be partially funded
under continuing resolution budget authority which, if prolonged,
could reduce marketing opportunities and disrupt operational
continuity.

Governance related considerations are somewhat elevated for BAH.
Lack of clarity persists toward resolution of the US Department of
Justice's civil and criminal investigation regarding the company's
indirect cost charging practices with the US government, which
commenced three years ago. Even so, Moody's believes the matter is
unlikely to culminate in a substantial charge. BAH also suffered
negative publicity related to former rogue employees who stole
national security related data from classified programs.

The speculative grade liquidity rating of SGL-1 reflects a very
good liquidity profile stemming from high cash balances, a
sufficiently sized backstop revolving credit facility, and a good
level of covenant headroom under the company' bank credit facility
financial maintenance covenants.

The Ba2 rating on the senior unsecured notes is one notch below the
CFR, reflecting the potential for significant loss absorption for
this creditor class in a default given the sizeable amount of
secured and other priority claims in the company's consolidated
capitalization. The notes will be guaranteed by domestic
subsidiaries, in line with the company's senior secured credit
facility.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Upward ratings momentum would depend on an expectation of leverage
generally remaining at or below 3x and free cash flow of $300
million or more, with a healthy backlog and cash maintained at $350
million or higher. While BAH has not been acquisitive, it could be
in the future, and credit metrics could in turn weaken from current
levels. Confidence that risk appetite will remain within acceptable
bounds for a prospectively higher rating will be a key ratings
factor.

Downward ratings pressure would mount with negative contract
developments, an unexpectedly negative outcome from the US
Department of Justice investigation, leverage exceeding 4x, and/or
a significantly diminished liquidity profile.

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. is a publicly traded (NYSE: BAH) provider
of management and technology consulting and engineering services to
governments in the defense, intelligence and civil markets, global
corporations and not-for-profit organizations. Booz Allen Hamilton
is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, and reported revenues of
approximately $7.5 billion for fiscal year ended March 31, 2020.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Aerospace and
Defense Methodology published in July 2020.


BRIGGS & STRATTON: Taps King & Spalding as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Briggs & Stratton Corporation and its affiliates received
provisional approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri to continue to employ King & Spalding LLP.

King & Spalding will continue to represent Debtors in two major
trade cases, which are brought under the anti-dumping and
countervailing duty laws to determine whether a domestic industry
is being harmed by unfairly traded imports.

In addition to the two major trade cases, King & Spalding will
advise Debtors on matters relating to trade litigation and trade
policy, and assists Debtors in objecting to extensions of
exclusions on tariffs granted by the U.S. government on engines
imported from China that compete with Debtors' products.  The firm
will also continue to represent Debtors in connection with a
California Air Resource Board rulemaking involving recently
proposed changes to its small offroad engine exhaust and
evaporative emissions regulations.

The firm's hourly rates are as follows:

     Partners                $820 to $1,290
     Counsel                 $750 to $1,005
     Associates              $440 to $750
     Paraprofessionals       $190 to $325
     Non-Lawyer Consultants  $750 to $925

King & Spalding neither represents nor holds any interest adverse
to Debtor and its bankruptcy estate with respect to the matter on
which the firm is to be employed, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

    Stephen J. Orava, Esq.
    King & Spalding LLP
    1180 Peachtree Street, NE, Suite 1600
    Atlanta, GA 30309
    Phone: +1 404 572 4600

                About Briggs & Stratton Corporation

Briggs & Stratton Corporation is a producer of gasoline engines for
outdoor power equipment and a designer, manufacturer and marketer
of power generation, pressure washer, lawn and garden, turf care,
and job site products. The Company's products are marketed and
serviced in more than 100 countries on six continents through
40,000 authorized dealers and service organizations.  Visit
https://www.basco.com for more information.

Briggs & Stratton Corporation and four affiliates concurrently
filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Lead Case No. 20-43597) on July
20, 2020. The petitions were signed by Mark A. Schwertfeger, senior
vice president and chief financial officer.  At the time of the
filing, Briggs & Stratton Corporation disclosed total assets of
$1,589,398,000 and total liabilities of $1,350,058,000 as of March
29, 2020.

Judge Barry S. Schermer oversees the cases.

Debtors have tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Carmody MacDonald P.C. as local counsel; Foley & Lardner
LLP as corporate counsel; Houlihan Lokey Inc. as investment banker;
Ernst & Young, LLP as restructuring and tax advisor; Deloitte LLP
as auditor and tax consultant; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants,
LLC
as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors in Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.


BROOKS BROTHERS: List of 38 Stores Permanently Closed
-----------------------------------------------------
Brooks Brothers, the iconic apparel maker founded in 1818 and known
for its suits, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy to seek a buyer.

The coronavirus pandemic and associated store closures hurt Brooks
Brothers' sales, but according to The New York Times, the retailer
was considering restructuring even before the virus hit.

Before filing for bankruptcy, Brooks Brothers made the decision to
close 51 stores due to the coronavirus pandemic, a company
spokesperson said.  Some of these locations have already
permanently shuttered, while others are in the process of closing.


Brooks Brothers' Web site currently lists 38 stores as permanently
closed.  Here is where they are located:

   * Tucson Premium Outlet, 6401 West Marana Center Boulevard,
Tucson, AZ 85742

   * La Encantada, 2905 East Skyline Drive, Tucson, AZ 85718

   * Petaluma Village Premium Outlet, 2200 Petaluma Boulevard
North, Petaluma, CA 94952

   * Union Square, 240 Post Street, San Francisco, CA 94108

   * Outlet At Tejon, 5701 Outlets At Tejon Parkway, Tejon Ranch,
CA 93203

   * Colorado Mills, 14500 West Colfax Avenue, Lakewood, CO 80401

   * Boston Post Road, 987 Boston Post Road, Darien, CT 06820

   * Stamford Town Center, 100 Greyrock Place, Stamford, CT 06901

   * Westport - Women's, 125 Main Street, Westport, CT 06880

   * M Street - Georgetown, 3077 M Street, Northwest, Washington,
DC 20007

   * Sanibel Outlet, 20350 Summerlin Road, Ft. Myers, FL 33908

   * Worth Avenue, 225 Worth Avenue, Palm Beach, FL 33480

   * The Rookery, 209 South Lasalle Street, Chicago, IL 60604

   * State Street - Women's, 75 State Street, Boston, MA 02109

   * Hagerstown Premium Outlet, 175 Premium Outlets Boulevard,
Hagerstown, MD 21740

   * Chesterfield Outlets, 17801 North Outer 40 Road, Chesterfield,
MO 63005

   * Osage Beach Premium Outlet, 4540 Osage Beach Parkway, Osage
Beach, MO 65065

   * Biltmore Village, 1 All Souls Crescent, Asheville, NC 28803

   * Carolina Premium Outlet, 1225 Outlet Center Drive, Smithfield,
NC 27577

   * Nebraska Crossing Outlet, 21215 Nebraska Crossing Drive,
Gretna, NE 68028

   * Shops at Riverside Women's - One Riverside Square, Hackensack,
NJ 07601

   * Fashion Outlet of Santa Fe, 8380 Cerrillos Road, Santa Fe, NM
87507

   * Downtown Summerlin, 1955 Festival Plaza Drive, Las Vegas, NV
89135

   * Forum Shops at Caesar's, 3500 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las
Vegas, NV 89109

   * Las Vegas South Premium Outlet, 7400 Las Vegas Boulevard
South, Las Vegas, NV 89123

   * 412 Wheatley Plaza, Greenvale, NY 11548

   * 2381 Broadway (87th Street), New York, NY 10024

   * Flatiron Shop - 901 Broadway (20th Street), New York, NY
10003

   * Waterloo Premium Outlet, 655 State Route 318, Waterloo, NY
13165

   * Aurora Farms Premium Outlet, 549 South Chillicothe Road,
Aurora, OH 44202

   * Tower City Center, 230 West Huron Road, Cleveland, OH 44113

   * Outlet Shoppes at Gettysburg, 1863 Gettysburg Village Drive,
Gettysburg, PA 17325

   * Gaffney Premium Outlet, 700 Factory Shops Boulevard, Gaffney,
SC 29341

   * Grand Prairie Premium Outlet, 2950 West Interstate 20, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052

   * Outlet Shoppes at Laredo, 1600 Water Street, Laredo, TX 78040

   * Market Street at The Woodlands, 9595 Six Pines Drive, The
Woodlands, TX 77380

   * Bayshore Town Center, 5700 North Bayshore Drive, Glendale, WI
53217

   * Outlet Shoppes at Oshkosh, 3001 South Washburn, Oshkosh, WI
54904

                 About Brooks Brothers Group

Brooks Brothers -- https://www.brooksbrothers.com/ -- is a
clothing
retailer with over 1,400 locations in over 45 countries. While
famous for its clothing offerings and related retail services,
Brooks Brothers is known as a lifestyle brand for men, women, and
children, which markets and sells footwear, eyewear, bags,
jewelry,
watches, sports articles, games, personal care items, tableware,
fragrances, bedding, linens, food items, beverages, and more.

Brooks Brothers Group, Inc. is the Debtors' ultimate corporate
parent, which directly or indirectly owns each of the other Debtor
entities.

Brooks Brothers Group, Inc. and 12 of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case No. 20-11785) on
July 8, 2020.

In the petitions signed by CRO Stephen Marotta, the Debtors were
estimated to have assets and liabilities of $500 million to $1
billion.

The Hon. Christopher Sontchi presides over the cases.

Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
serve as counsel to the Debtors.  PJ Solomon, L.P acts as
investment banker; Ankura Consulting Group LLC is the financial
advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.


BROOKS BROTHERS: Selling to Simon & SPARC for $325M
---------------------------------------------------
CNBC reports that Brooks Brothers said it is likely to be acquired
by Authentic Brands Group LLC and SPARC Group LLC after they
increased their offer to $325 million.

SPARC, a venture backed by brand manager Authentic Brands Group LLC
and mall operator Simon Property Group Inc, has agreed to continue
operating at least 125 Brooks Brothers retail locations as part of
the deal.

Brooks Brothers said a hearing to approve the sale was currently
scheduled for Aug. 14, with the deal expected to be completed by
this month-end.

The company clinched a $305 million "stalking horse" deal with
SPARC that set the floor for other offers in a bankruptcy auction.

Brooks Brothers had already been struggling as corporate America,
including Wall Street, relaxed its dress code for employees,
allowing them to choose casual dressing over bespoke suits.

The U.S. retailer had set a deadline to receive offers better than
Authentic Brands and Simon Property's, but none came in, sources
familiar with the matter had told Reuters.

Fox Business reports that brand-licensing company WHP Global Inc.
has bowed out of the race for Brooks Brothers Inc., according to
people familiar with the matter, leaving the Authentic and Simon
joint veture poised to take control of the bankrupt retailer.

Like Authentic Brands, WHP Global buys consumer brands, often out
of bankruptcy, and revives them by shedding unprofitable
locations.

                 About Brooks Brothers Group

Brooks Brothers -- https://www.brooksbrothers.com/ -- is a
clothing
retailer with over 1,400 locations in over 45 countries. While
famous for its clothing offerings and related retail services,
Brooks Brothers is known as a lifestyle brand for men, women, and
children, which markets and sells footwear, eyewear, bags,
jewelry,
watches, sports articles, games, personal care items, tableware,
fragrances, bedding, linens, food items, beverages, and more.

Brooks Brothers Group, Inc. is the Debtors' ultimate corporate
parent, which directly or indirectly owns each of the other Debtor
entities.

Brooks Brothers Group, Inc. and 12 of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case No. 20-11785) on
July 8, 2020.

In the petitions signed by CRO Stephen Marotta, the Debtors were
estimated to have assets and liabilities of $500 million to $1
billion.

The Hon. Christopher Sontchi presides over the cases.

Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
serve as counsel to the Debtors.  PJ Solomon, L.P acts as
investment banker; Ankura Consulting Group LLC is the financial
advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.



BYRNA TECHNOLOGIES: Says Substantial Going Concern Doubt Exists
---------------------------------------------------------------
Byrna Technologies Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $2,284,373 on $148,580 of net revenue for
the three months ended Feb. 29, 2020, compared to a net loss of
$883,772 on $11,107 of net revenue for the three months ended Feb.
28, 2020.

At Feb. 29, 2020, the Company had total assets of $3,721,498, total
liabilities of $6,449,522, and $2,728,024 in total stockholders'
deficit.

The Company disclosed that there is substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern for one year after the
issuance of its financial statements.

Byrna Technologies said, "The Company has incurred a cumulative
loss of $39,946,496 from inception through February 29, 2020.  The
Company has funded operations through the issuance of common stock,
warrants, and convertible notes payable.  The Company generates
revenue from operations.  However, it still expects to incur
significant losses before the Company's revenues can sustain its
operations.  The Company's future success is dependent upon its
ability to raise sufficient capital or generate adequate revenue,
to cover its ongoing operating expenses, and also to continue to
develop and be able to profitably market its products.
Management's plans to continue operations include seeking to expand
sales of the Byrna(R) HD in new marketing channels domestically and
internationally, offering new products to drive revenue increases
in the way that the April 2019 commencement of Byrna(R) HD sales
drove the fiscal 2019 revenue increase.  In addition, subsequent to
February 29, 2020, the Company (1) raised approximately $3.2
million through early warrant exercises and (2) exchanged all
outstanding convertible debt for preferred stock, resulting in the
Company no longer having any outstanding notes payable.  The
Company may explore other financing alternatives to raise capital,
if needed.  There can be no assurance that such revenue will be
generated, or financing will be available at all or on favorable
terms.  Based on these factors, there is substantial doubt about
the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.  The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty; such adjustments could
be material."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/PKqKw0



CAPITAL TRUCK: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Aug. 12, 2020, disclosed in a
court filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has
been appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Capital Truck, Inc.
  
                       About Capital Truck

Capital Truck, Inc., a company based in Tallahassee, Fla., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 20-40287) on July
14, 2020.  Capital Truck President Mark Thomas signed the petition.
At the time of the filing, Debtor was estimated to have $1 million
to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  Bruner Wright, P.A.
is Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


CDW CORP: S&P Rates $630MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level and '6' recovery
ratings to the $630 million senior unsecured notes due in 2029
proposed by integrated information technology (IT) solutions
provider CDW Corp. (CDW). These ratings match those on the
company's existing unsecured debt. CDW LLC and CDW Finance Corp.
will issue the notes, and the notes will rank pari passu with
existing unsecured debt.

CDW intends to use the proceeds to refinance its $600 million
senior unsecured notes due in September 2025 and pay
transaction-related fees. S&P therefore views the transaction as
neutral to its adjusted leverage, which nets surplus cash from the
debt amount.

S&P's 'BB+' issuer credit rating on CDW Corp. is unchanged. The
rating reflects the company's position as a leading IT reseller in
North America, its broad product portfolio, and its deep domain
expertise. Those factors are partly offset by its participation in
a highly fragmented and competitive industry, as well as its
exposure to cyclical IT spending from its small and midsize
customers.

Following an initial boost in transactional revenues in the first
quarter of 2020 to support the transition to remote work, CDW's
second-quarter results highlighted the exposure of IT spending in
its corporate and small business customer base to the recessionary
environment. Despite strong revenue growth from its government and
education end markets, total revenues declined 5.7% in the quarter.
S&P expects a low- to mid-single-digit percent revenue decline for
2020 due to S&P's expectations of a similar 4% decline in global IT
spending.

However, S&P maintains its stable outlook because it expects
leverage to increase only slightly to the mid-2x area at the end of
2020, and that is well below its downgrade threshold of 4x. This
reflects remediating actions to maintain discretionary cash flows,
including temporarily suspending share repurchases and implementing
cost-saving initiatives, resulting in leverage of about 2x as of
June 30, 2020. Furthermore, liquidity remains robust and was
supported by about $2 billion of combined cash and asset-based
facility availability as of June 30, 2020, after the $600 million
note issuance in April 2020. CDW's only significant debt maturity
within the next 24 months is the $1.45 billion asset-based facility
due in March 2022.

Issue Ratings - Recovery Analysis

Key analytical factors

-- S&P bases its 'BB-' issue-level rating on the total senior
unsecured debt of about $2.4 billion on a '6' recovery rating,
which indicates its expectation for negligible recovery (0%-10%;
rounded estimate: 0%) in the event of payment default. This is due
to the presence of significant secured debt in the capital
structure.

-- S&P bases its existing 'BBB-' rating on the initial $1.49
billion senior secured term loan on a '2' recovery rating, which
indicates its expectation for substantial (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 80%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

-- S&P's hypothetical default scenario contemplates protracted
revenue declines or EBITDA margin contraction due to increased
competition, pricing pressure, and customer attrition, combined
with an economic slowdown and a corresponding downturn in IT
spending.
-- S&P values CDW as a going concern because of its good market
position, brand, and customer relationships.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Year of default: 2025
-- Emergence EBITDA after recovery adjustments: About $350
million
-- EBITDA multiple: 6.5x

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): About
$2.2 billion

-- Valuation split (obligors/CDW nonobligors/CDW U.K.
nonobligors): 91%/4%/5%

-- CDW priority claims*: $919 million

-- CDW U.K. priority claims*: $110 million

-- Collateral value available for secured claims: $1.1 billion

-- Secured debt claims*: $1.4 billion

-- Recovery expectations**: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 80%)

-- Unpledged value available for unsecured debt claims: $35
million

-- Senior unsecured debt claims*: About $2.45 billion

-- Recovery expectations**: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 0%)

*-- All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.
Collateral value equals asset pledge from obligors less priority
claims, plus equity pledge from nonobligors after nonobligor
claims. S&P assumes the CDW U.K. revolving credit facility is 85%
drawn at default and the asset-based facility is 60% drawn at
default.

**--Rounded down to the nearest 5%.


CEL-SCI CORP: Posts $10.2 Million Net Loss in Third Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------
CEL-SCI Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss
available to common shareholders of $10.22 million on $195,874 of
grant income for the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to
a net loss available to common shareholders of $12.08 million on
$108,938 of grant income for the three months ended June 30, 2019.

For the nine months ended June 30, 2020, the Company reported a net
loss available to common shareholders of $24.73 million on $530,106
of grant income compared to a net loss available to common
shareholders of $17.28 million on $386,121 of grant income for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019.

As fo June 30, 2020, the Company had $42.03 million in total
assets, $23.02 million in total liabilities, and $19.01 million in
total stockholders' equity.

CEL-SCI said, "Management is actively monitoring the impact of the
global situation on its financial condition, liquidity, operations,
suppliers, industry, and workforce.  Given the daily evolution of
the COVID-19 outbreak and the global responses to curb its spread,
the Company is not able to estimate the effects of the COVID-19
outbreak on its results of operations, financial condition, or
liquidity for fiscal year 2020.  Although the Company cannot
estimate the length or gravity of the impact of the COVID-19
outbreak, if the pandemic continues, it may have an adverse effect
on the Company's results of future operations, financial position,
and liquidity in fiscal year 2020."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/HNKzDN

                   About CEL-SCI Corporation

CEL-SCI -- http://www.cel-sci.com/-- is a clinical-stage
biotechnology company focused on finding the best way to activate
the immune system to fight cancer and infectious diseases.  The
Company's lead investigational therapy Multikine is currently in a
pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial involving head and neck cancer, for
which the Company has received Orphan Drug Status from the FDA.
The Company has operations in Vienna, Virginia, and near Baltimore,
Maryland.

CEL-SCI reported a net loss of $22.13 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $31.84 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2018.  As of March 31, 2020, the Company had
$34.72 million in total assets, $22.51 million in total
liabilities, and $12.21 million in total stockholders' equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in Potomac, Maryland, the Company's independent
accounting firm, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Dec. 16, 2019, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and expects to incur substantial
losses for the foreseeable future that raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


CERESOTA FUNDING II: Files for Bankruptcy Protection
----------------------------------------------------
Dee DePass of Star Tribune reports that Ceresota Funding II LLC,
owner of the Millers Landing Senior Living, located in the former
Ceresota building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection.

The owner of the historic Ceresota senior apartment building in
Minneapolis' Mill District filed for bankruptcy after defaulting on
a bank agreement.

John Lamey III, the attorney filing the bankruptcy on behalf of
Ceresota Funding II President Ross Dworsky, wrote in an e-mail that
the bankruptcy reorganization "filing was to preserve that business
on an ongoing basis. The filing was done to stave off a foreclosure
by a mortgage holder. We filed the morning of the sheriff sale."

The facility's tax credit investor, MinnWest Bank, filed a motion
asking a federal court to dismiss the bankruptcy case. Minn¬West
Bank said it notified the managing member of Ceresota on Jan. 20
that the Ceresota project was in "material default."

It also said that in March, it exercised its right to become the
managing member of the project and that it never authorized any
bankruptcy filing. A July 29 court hearing is scheduled.

The Ceresota structure is a historic landmark located near the
Stone Arch Bridge. The 11-story building started out in 1908 as the
Northwestern Consolidated Milling Co. Elevator and was converted
into offices in 1987.

It was renovated yet again into a senior-living facility around
2015. According to court records, Ceresota's business is referred
to as Millers Landing Senior Living and has about 35 senior
residents and memory care patients at the site.

The property's conversion to senior apartments was a coup for city
officials who in 2013 pledged to foster the creation of 35
senior-living apartments across the city by 2025.

The Ceresota project was one of the first market-rate senior-living
facilities in the downtown riverfront area. It was joined by other
projects across the city, including the five-story Abiitan Mill
City assisted-living facility across the street on the corner of
5th Avenue and 2nd Street.

Sue Lee, the spokesperson for Abiitan Mill City, said her company
has a "commitment to downtown" and is proud of its "beautiful
senior housing building. We love our location." She declined to
discuss the Ceresota facility or discuss demand for senior housing
in Minneapolis.

But others noted that while some senior apartments focus on
affordability and income restrictions, not many offer amenities
geared toward the elderly in downtown.

Many people aging out of apartments and condos move out of the city
to live in facilities near relatives in the suburbs, said Mary
Bujold, president of the market research firm Maxfield Research.

"There isn't a lot of senior housing in Minneapolis, period,"
Bujold said.

Besides Ceresota and Abiitan, the city has a smattering of senior
apartments, including the Kenwood Isles Condos in Kenwood,
Augustana Apartments in south Minneapolis, the Waters on West 50th
Street, and others in Uptown, southwest Minneapolis and near Lake
Nokomis, she said.

With respect to the Ceresota building’s bankruptcy, "I think what
will happen is they will reorganize, or will potentially get
somebody else to buy them out," Bujold said.

                   About Ceresota Funding II

Ceresota Funding II, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (D. Minn.
Case No. 20-41740) on July 1, 2020.  The Hon. Kathleen H. Sanberg
is the presiding judge.  John D. Lamey III, Esq., at LAMEY LAW
FIRM, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor was estimated to
have $10 million to $50 million  in assets and liabilities as of
the bankruptcy filing.



CHESAPEAKE ENERGY: Forshey Represents Royalty Committee Members
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of Chesapeake Energy Corporation, et al.,
the law firm of Forshey Prostok LLP submitted a verified statement
under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, to
disclose that it is representing the Official Committee of Royalty
Owners.

On July 24, 2020, the United States Trustee for Region 7 filed a
Notice of Appointment of Committee of Royalty Owners [Docket No.
488], which formed the official Royalty Committee. The Royalty
Committee consists of the following nine (9) members: B.D. Griffin,
Jeff G. Snowden, Ron Carlton, Daniel A. Leis, Ryan Watts, Clark A.
Beebe, Michael D. Donovan, Aaron D. Hovan, and Charles E.
Schaffer.

On August 10, 2020, the United States Trustee for Region 7 filed a
Notice of Reconstituted Committee of Royalty Owners [Docket No.
698], which reconstituted the Royalty Committee to consist of the
following seven (7) members: B.D. Griffin, Jeff G. Snowden, Ron
Carlton, Daniel A. Leis, Ryan Watts, Clark A. Beebe, and Aaron D.
Hovan.

As of Aug. 11, 2020, the Royalty Committee members of and their
disclosable economic interests are:

B.D. Griffin
501 N. Thompson, Suite 300
Conroe, TX 77301

* B.D. Griffin currently owns 314 mineral acres located in Dimmit
  County, Texas and holds a claim against Chesapeake Energy
  Corporation pursuant to an oil and gas lease between Mr. Griffin
  and Chesapeake dated February 28, 2010, as amended from time to
  time. Currently, Mr. Griffin's prepetition claim is no less than
  $1.34 million. Mr. Griffin may also possess claims against
  Chesapeake for certain other relief. In addition, Mr. Griffin
  has claims arising from post-petition production under the
  Griffin Lease in an undetermined amount.

Jeff G. Snowden
Capex Consulting Group
3245 Main Street, Suite 235-171
Frisco, TX 75033

* Jeff G. Snowden and his family currently owns 600 mineral acres
  located in Dimmit County, Texas and holds a claim against
  Chesapeake pursuant to an oil and gas lease between Mr. Snowden
  and Chesapeake dated July 9, 2010, as amended from time to time.
  Currently, Mr. Snowden's prepetition claim is no less than $1.5
  million. Mr. Snowden may also possess claims against Chesapeake
  for certain other relief, including a termination/release of
  acreage claim. In addition, Mr. Snowden has claims arising from
  post-petition production under the Snowden Lease in an
  undetermined amount.

Ron Carlton CTF, Ltd.
100 Cinder Road NE
Carrollton, OH 44615-9637

* Ron Carlton currently has royalty interests in more than 400
  mineral acres located in Carroll County, Ohio, including more
  than 113 acres owned by him and his wife Judy Carlton, and more
  than 300 acres owned through CTF, Ltd, an entity owned by Mr.
  Carlton and his two brothers. Mr. and Mrs. Ron Carlton hold
  claims against Chesapeake pursuant to an oil and gas lease
  between Ronald E. Carlton and Judy L. Carlton, husband and wife,
  and Chesapeake Exploration, LLC dated November 28, 2011, as
  amended from time to time. CTF Ltd. holds claims against
  Chesapeake pursuant to two oil and gas leases between: (1) CTF,
  Ltd. by Richard A. Carlton, Member; Ronald E. Carlton, Member;
  and Bruce D. Carlton, Member and Ohio Buckeye Energy, LLC, dated
  December 9, 2010, as amended from time to time; and (2) CTF,
  Ltd. by Richard A. Carlton, Member; Ronald E. Carlton, Member;
  and Bruce D. Carlton, Member and Chesapeake Exploration, LLC,
  dated November 28, 2011, as amended from time to time.

  In addition to the claims held by CTF, Ltd. against Chesapeake,
  Mr. Carlton's brother Bruce Carlton and his wife own more than
  40 mineral acres located in Carroll County, Ohio. They hold
  additional individual claims against Chesapeake pursuant to an
  oil and gas lease between Bruce D. Carlton and Catherine B.
  Carlton and Chesapeake Exploration, LLC, dated April 15, 2011.
  In addition to the claims held by CTF, Ltd. against Chesapeake,
  Mr. Carlton's brother Rick Carlton and his wife own more than 12
  mineral acres located in Carroll County, Ohio. They hold
  additional individual claims against Chesapeake pursuant to an
  oil and gas lease between Richard A. Carlton and Catherine A.
  Carlton and Chesapeake Exploration, LLC, dated November 28,
  2011.

  Currently, the Carltons' and CTF, Ltd.'s prepetition claim is no
  less than $6.5 million. The Carltons and CTF Ltd. may also
  possess claims against Chesapeake for certain other relief.
  Finally, the Carltons and CTF, Ltd. may have claims arising from
  post-petition production under the leases in an undetermined
  amount.

Daniel A. Leis
Union Pacific Railroad Company
1400 Douglas Street, Stop 1690
Omaha, NE 68179

* Daniel A. Leis is a corporate representative of Union Pacific
  Railroad Company. Union Pacific currently owns approximately
  1,360 mineral acres in the Barnett Shale in North Texas and
  holds claims against Chesapeake pursuant to 35 oil and gas
  leases between Union Pacific Railroad Company and Chesapeake.
  Union Pacific's prepetition claim is estimated to be no less
  than $95,466,957.50. Union Pacific may also possess claims
  against Chesapeake for certain other relief. In addition, Union
  Pacific may have other claims arising from pre- and post-
  petition production under other Union Pacific Oil and Gas Leases
  in other basins around the United States in an undetermined
  amount.

Ryan Watts
Addax Minerals Fund, L.P.
5950 Berkshire Lane, Suite 1250
Dallas, TX 75225

* Ryan Watts is the corporate representative for the "Addax Group"
  of entities asserting claims against Chesapeake for underpayment
  of royalties pursuant to pursuant to over 6,000 oil and gas
  leases in the Barnett Shale. Currently, the Addax Group's
  prepetition claim is no less than $10,000,000. The Addax Group
  may also possess claims against Chesapeake for certain other
  relief, including claims that mineral acreage subject to the
  Watts Lease was released by Chesapeake. In addition, Mr. Watts
  has claims arising from post-petition production under the Watts
  Lease in an undetermined amount.

Clark A. Beebe
2092 Lakeside Drive West
P.O. Box 194
Highland Lakes, NJ 07422

* Clark A. Beebe currently owns a total of 411 mineral acres
  located in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, including 333 acres
  owned by him individually, and 78 acres owned by him and his
  wife, Donna L. Beebe, as co-trustee of the Beebe Living Trust,
  dated June 26, 2010, and holds claims against Chesapeake
  pursuant to two oil and gas leases, one between M. Beebe
  individually and Chesapeake, dated February 18, 2006, and one
  between the Beebe Living Trust and Chesapeake, also dated
  February 18, 2006, both as amended from time to time. Currently,
  Mr. Beebe's prepetition claim is no less than $600,000. Mr.
  Beebe may also possess claims against Chesapeake for certain
  other relief. In addition, Mr. Beebe has claims arising from
  post- petition production under the Beebe Lease in an
  undetermined amount.

Aaron D. Hovan
154 Warren Street
P.O. Box 336
Tunkhannock, PA 18657

* Mr. Hovan currently owns approximately thirty-five (35) net
  mineral acres which are currently leased to Chesapeake. These
  acres are located in Northeast Pennsylvania, including ten (10)
  acres owned by Mr. Hovan, individually, and approximately
  twenty-five (25) net mineral acres owned but not controlled by
  Mr. Hovan as a non- controlling limited partner in two limited
  partnerships. Mr. Hovan hold claims against Chesapeake pursuant
  to the certain Paid Up Oil and Gas Lease dated June 28, 2008
  between Lynn Zoller and Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, as amended
  from time to time. Mr. Hovan purchased twenty-five percent (25%)
  of the Hovan Lease from Lynn Zoller on August 30th, 2013. Mr.
  Hovan does not control the two limited partnerships that own the
  other leases described above. Currently, Mr. Hovan holds a
  prepetition claim in an unliquidated amount. Mr. Hovan may also
  possess claims against Chesapeake for certain other relief. In
  addition, Mr. Hovan has claims arising from post-petition
  production under the Hovan Lease in an undetermined amount.

  Mr. Hovan, and his co-counsel Ira Richards, are counsel to
  Lillian Sarnosky, objector in the action captioned Demchak
  Partners Limited Partnership v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.,
  No. 3:13-cv-02289-MEM (M.D. Pa.).  Mrs. Sarnosky owns
  approximately 3 net oil and gas acres.  Mrs. Sarnosky holds
  claims against Chesapeake pursuant to her lease with Chesapeake
  dated November 9, 2009. Mrs. Sarnosky holds claims against
  Chesapeake for underpaid royalties, wrongfully taken deductions,
  and for violations of mutual benefit covenant. Mrs. Sarnosky
  especially complains about Chesapeake's practice of paying
  "negative royalties," that is producing gas from Mrs. Sarnosky's
  leasehold and not paying her any royalties for particular
  months. Mrs. Sarnosky's objection seeks to protect class
  interests worth tens of millions of dollars.

  Mr. Hovan, and his co-counsel, Ira Richards, are also counsel to
  the Tyler Family LP and their general partners Tim and Brian
  Tyler, who are putative class plaintiffs in the action against
  Debtor captioned Tyler v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C., 3:16-
  cv-00456-MEM (M.D. Pa.).  The Tylers own over 400 net oil and
  gas acres. The Tylers hold claims against Chesapeake pursuant to
  their leases with Chesapeake dated January 2, 2008. The Tylers
  hold claims against Chesapeake for underpaid royalties,
  wrongfully taken deductions, and for violations of mutual
  benefit covenant. The Tyler's individual claims are in excess of
  $1,000,0000. The claims of the putative Tyler class are worth in

  excess of $100,000,000.

  Finally, Mr. Hovan, and his co-counsel, Ira Richards, are
  counsel to a group of landowners in the litigation captioned
  Chambers v. Chesapeake Appalachia L.L.C., 3:18-cv- 00437-ARC
  (M.D.Pa.). The landowners allege royalty underpayment due to
  wrongfully taken deductions, and violation of well-spacing
  claims. The claims are worth more than $1,000,000.

  Mr. Hovan also represents multiple royalty owners and landowners
  with ongoing business with various debtors. These matters
  include real estate sales, lease negotiations, and other matters
  involving Chesapeake as part of the general ongoing business of
  the Debtors.

Proposed Counsel for the Official Committee of Royalty Owners can
be reached at:

          J. Robert Forshey, Esq.
          Jeff P. Prostok, Esq.
          Suzanne K. Rosen, Esq.
          FORSHEY PROSTOK LLP
          777 Main St., Suite 1550
          Fort Worth, TX 76102
          Telephone: (817) 877-8855
          Facsimile: (817) 877-4151
          Email: bforshey@forsheyprostok.com
                 jprostok@forsheyprostok.com
                 srosen@forsheyprostok.com

             - and -

          Deirdre C. Brown, Esq.
          FORSHEY PROSTOK, LLP
          1990 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2400
          Houston, TX 77056
          Telephone: (832) 536-6910
          Facsimile: (832) 310-1172
          Email: dbrown@forsheyprostok.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/YvmtV4

                    About Chesapeake Energy

Headquartered in Oklahoma City, Chesapeake Energy Corporation's
(NYSE: CHK) operations are focused on discovering and developing
its large and geographically diverse resource base of
unconventional oil and natural gas assets onshore in the United
States.

Chesapeake Energy reported a net loss of $308 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the company had $16.19
billion in total assets, $2.39 billion in total current
liabilities, $9.40 billion in total long-term liabilities, and
$4.40 billion in total equity.

Chesapeake Energy and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-33233) on June 28, 2020, after
reaching terms of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization to eliminate
approximately $7 billion of debt.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as legal counsel; Alvarez &
Marsal as restructuring advisor; Rothschild & Co and Intrepid
Financial Partners as financial advisors; and Reevemark as
communications advisor.  Epiq Global is the claims agent,
maintaining the page http://www.chk.com/restructuring-information.


Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz serves as legal counsel to
Chesapeake Energy's Board of Directors.

MUFG Union Bank, N.A., the DIP facility agent and exit facilities
agent, has tapped Sidley Austin LLP as legal counsel; RPA Advisors,
LLC as financial advisor; and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as
investment banker.

Davis Polk & Wardell LLP and Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. serve as legal
counsel to an ad hoc group of first lien last out term loan lenders
while Perella Weinberg Partners and Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co.
serve as the group's investment bankers.

Franklin Advisers, Inc., has tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
LLP as legal counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial advisor;
and Moelis & Company LLC as investment banker.


CINEMARK HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'B+'; Ratings on Watch Negative
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer credit rating on
U.S. and Latin-American theater operator Cinemark Holdings Inc. to
'B+' from 'BB-' and maintained all of its ratings on CreditWatch,
where it placed them with negative implications on March 16, 2020.

S&P expects a prolonged effect on theater attendance will cause
leverage to remain above 4x through 2021 and potentially beyond.

Although Cinemark plans to open its U.S. theaters in August,
considerable risk and uncertainty related to this timeline remain.
Studios may continue to delay films if the coronavirus pandemic
does not show any signs of abating by the end of the month.

"Furthermore, we expect a slow return to regular box office
attendance once theaters are open due to consumers' health and
safety concerns. We expect the box office will rebound in 2021 due
to an attractive film slate and pent-up demand for out-of-home
activities, but the pace of the recovery is unclear," S&P said.

Although studios will have a backlog of films to release,
consumers' discomfort with attending public events may take longer
to overcome. Attendance will not return close to 2019 levels until
a vaccine or treatment has been developed and social distancing is
no longer required. S&P now expects leverage to remain above 4x
through year-end 2021 and cash flow will remain thin after
factoring in deferred lease payments.

S&P expects Cinemark will have more than sufficient liquidity to
fund its theaters while closed and through a slow ramp-up to
normalized attendance.

Cinemark has $571 million of cash on hand as of June 30, 2020, and
its cash burn while closed is roughly $50 million per month.
Additionally, its cash burn is less dependent on lease deferrals
than that of peers due to its lower lease expense as a percent of
revenue and its ability to utilize abatement and percentage rent
features that already existed in its leases, especially in Latin
America. Cinemark was able to reduce its lease expense by 27% in
the second quarter and deferred $40 million of the remaining $65
million. These lower lease expenses and deferred liabilities will
benefit Cinemark relative to its peers and allow the company to
achieve theater-level profitability at a lower attendance level.
Cinemark currently has enough cash to remain closed for up to
another 12 months. However, S&P expects attendance to slowly return
to normal once theaters re-open, upon which it will continue to
burn cash, but at a much lower rate. S&P forecasts it could take
three-to-four months after reopening for the company to reach
neutral cash flow. Therefore the company's cash runway could be
threatened if it does not open in the next six-to-nine months. That
said, this timeline provides considerable cushion as the company
plans to begin re-opening on Aug. 21, 2020.

Disney shifting Mulan to Premium Video On Demand (PVOD) is a
greater risk to exhibitors than Cinemark's key peer AMC
Entertainment Holding Inc.'s new PVOD deal with Universal Studios.

AMC recently announced a multi-year deal with Universal to allow
films to move to PVOD after only a 17-day window. In exchange, AMC
will participate in PVOD rental fees. Although S&P views PVOD as an
increasing threat to theaters, the effect of the AMC-Universal deal
will be minor unless other large exhibitors, such as Cinemark,
agree to similar terms. Currently, Universal would have to forgo
releasing a film in roughly 75% of U.S. screens (AMC has 25% market
share) to use this flexible window, since other exhibitors would
continue to hold Universal to the existing 90-day exclusive
theatrical release window. S&P believes that Universal will only
choose to utilize this option on small budget films that would
normally have a limited theater run. Cinemark has publicly stated
that it is open to negotiating the length of film windows but S&P
thinks it is unlikely that it would agree to similar terms as AMC's
deal with Universal. In addition, The Walt Disney Co. recently
announced that it will release Mulan directly to PVOD on its
Disney+ platform in the U.S. instead of waiting for theaters to
open. Prior to this, Disney had been the biggest supporter of the
theatrical distribution model, which works well for Disney's large
tent-pole films. Disney has been very clear that Mulan is a
one-time event, but it still provides the company with a test-case
for PVOD on its proprietary platform. It is also the first U.S.
test-case for using PVOD, in lieu of a theatrical release, to
distribute a large tent-pole film. If Mulan has a successful PVOD
launch, it could embolden Disney and other studios to bypass
theaters and increasingly distribute larger films directly to PVOD.
S&P would view this scenario as a fundamental change to the
competitive position of theaters that would have negative
implications for the entire exhibition industry.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors relevant to the
rating action:

-- Health and safety

S&P intends to resolve the CreditWatch placement when Cinemark's
theaters open, or if there is an update to the re-opening plan, and
the rating agency is able to evaluate attendance and revenue levels
over the rest of 2020.

S&P could lower the rating under any of the following scenarios:

-- If a resurgence in the coronavirus pandemic causes significant
delays in film release schedules to the point that S&P doesn't
expect domestic theaters to open in the third quarter.

-- If theaters re-open, but attendance remains substantially below
2019 levels for an extended period and S&P expects the company will
burn a substantial portion of its cash balance and operate with
leverage sustained above 5x.

-- If more studios experiment with PVOD, such that S&P believes
they intend to use PVOD as a permanent distribution model for
tent-pole films and it thinks the competitive position of theaters
has considerably weakened.

"We could affirm the 'B+' long-term issuer credit rating and revise
the outlook to stable if Cinemark opens its theaters in the third
quarter and we see signs that attendance will ramp-up to at least
50% of normal volume in the first two-to-three months. Revising the
outlook to stable would also likely require our view that no
additional large tent-pole films will shift to PVOD over the next
12 months," S&P said.


CLEAN ENERGY: Fruci & Associates II Raises Going Concern Doubt
--------------------------------------------------------------
Clean Energy Technologies, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a
net loss of $2,555,983 on $1,610,008 of sales for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $2,810,017 on $1,331,171
of sales for the year ended in 2018.

The audit report of Fruci & Associates II, PLLC states that the
Company has a significant accumulated deficit, net losses, and
negative working capital and has utilized significant net cash in
operations.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at Dec. 31, 2019, showed total assets
of $4,307,223, total liabilities of $9,559,701, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $5,252,478.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/awq7aJ

Clean Energy Technologies, Inc. designs, builds, and markets clean
energy products focused on energy efficiency. The company's
principal product is the Clean Cycle, a generator that captures
waste heat from various sources and turns it into electricity. It
also offers a range of electrical, mechanical, and software
engineering services; electronics manufacturing services; and
supply chain management services. The company was formerly known as
Probe Manufacturing, Inc. and changed its name to Clean Energy
Technologies, Inc. in November 2015. Clean Energy Technologies,
Inc. was founded in 1993 and is headquartered in Costa Mesa,
California.


CLEARWATER PAPER: S&P Rates $275MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level and '4' recovery
ratings to Clearwater Paper Corp.'s proposed $275 million senior
unsecured notes. The '4' recovery rating reflects its expectation
of average (30%-50%, rounded estimate: 30%) recovery in the event
of default. The company will use the net proceeds from this
offering to fully redeem its existing $275 million senior unsecured
notes due 2023. S&P views the proposed transaction as credit
neutral.

Clearwater Paper generated more than $120 million of operating cash
in the first half of 2020 and reduced debt by $100 million in the
second quarter of 2020, reducing leverage to 4.1x as of June 30,
2020. The company's Shelby plant has achieved full run rate and S&P
expects the company to eventually reach capacity of an additional
70,000-75,000 tons of tissue production. The new capacity will be
largely dedicated to higher-margin premium tissue products.
Incremental EBITDA will be key to the company's deleveraging plans
and S&P expects adjusted EBITDA of $200 million-$220 million and
leverage of 4x-4.5x in 2020.

Clearwater Paper Corp. produces and sells private-label tissue and
bleached paperboard products. It operates in two segments: consumer
products and pulp and paperboard. The consumer products segment
manufactures and sells a line of at-home tissue products, such as
bathroom tissue, paper towels, facial tissues, and napkins;
recycled fiber value-grade products; and away-from-home products,
such as conventional one- and two-ply bath tissue, two-ply paper
towels, hard wound towels, and dispenser napkins. It sells its
products to retailers and wholesale distributors, including
grocery, drug, and discount stores, as well as mass merchants. The
pulp and paperboard segment provides bleached paperboard, folding
cartons, liquid packaging, cups, plates, blister and carded
packaging, top sheet, and commercial printing items, as well as
hardwood and softwood pulp.


CORDOVACANN CORP: Has CAD23,000 Net Loss for March 31 Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
CordovaCann Corp. (formerly LiveReel Media Corporation) filed its
Form 6-K, disclosing a net loss of CAD22,910 on CAD0 of revenue for
the three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of
CAD1,273,321 on CAD0 of revenue for the same period in 2019.

At March 31, 2020, the Company had total assets of CAD4,992,496,
total liabilities of CAD6,442,660, and CAD1,450,164 in total
shareholders' deficit.

There is substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern as the Company incurred a comprehensive loss of
CAD2,070,145 (March 31, 2019 – CAD3,714,920) during the nine
months ended March 31, 2020 and has a total accumulated deficit of
CAD21,559,905 (June 30, 2019 – CAD19,570,801) as at March 31,
2020.  The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is
dependent upon its ability to access sufficient capital until it
has profitable operations and raises a material concern.  To this
point, all operational activities and overhead costs have been
funded through equity issuances, debt issuances and related party
advances.

A copy of the Form 6-K is available at:

                       https://is.gd/8XOWQP

CordovaCann Corp. (formerly LiveReel Media Corporation)
CordovaCann Corp., a cannabis-focused consumer products company,
primarily provides services and investment capital to the
processing and production vertical markets of the cannabis
industry. The company was formerly known as LiveReel Media
Corporation and changed its name to CordovaCann Corp. in January
2018. CordovaCann Corp. was founded in 1997 and is headquartered in
Toronto, Canada.


COVANTA HOLDING: S&P Rates New 2020A, 2020B Tax-Exempt Notes 'B'
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level rating and '5'
recovery rating to Covanta Holding Corp.'s proposed $39.4 million
series 2020A and $90 million series 2020B tax-exempt notes. The '5'
recovery rating indicated its expectation for modest (10%-30%;
rounded estimate: 15%) recovery in the event of a default. The
company plans to use the proceeds from these notes to repay its
existing notes due 2043 and 2045 in a debt-for-debt refinancing.

At the same time, S&Pe raised its issue-level rating on Covanta's
existing unsecured debt to 'B' from 'B-' and revised the recovery
rating to '5' from '6'. The proposed notes will be pari passu with
the company's existing rated debt and will replace notes that
currently have an upstream guarantee from Covanta Energy LLC.
Because all of Covanta's debt will now be equal in rank, there is
more value available for the unsecured lenders in the event of a
default.

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

-- S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a default
occurring in 2024 due to a decline in Covanta's EBITDA such that it
becomes insufficient to cover the company's consolidated fixed
charges and debt maturities. S&P assumes a decline due to
higher-than-expected operating costs, lower power prices and tip
fees, an inability to renew existing contracts on acceptable terms,
and poor operating results from domestic and international assets.

-- S&P believes that Covanta's underlying business would continue
to have considerable value and expect that the company would
reemerge from bankruptcy with $283 million of EBITDA.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Year of default: 2024
-- Implied enterprise value multiple: 6.5x
-- S&P assumes the $900 million revolver is 85% drawn

Simplified waterfall

-- Gross enterprise value: $1.84 billion

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $1.75
billion

-- Priority claims: $283 million

-- Value available to senior secured debt: $1.47 billion

-- Pro forma Covanta Energy senior secured debt claims: $1.15
billion

-- Value available to senior unsecured debt: $319 million

-- Pro forma Covanta Holding senior unsecured debt claims: $1.74
billion

-- Recovery expectations: 10%-30% (rounded estimate: 15%)

Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.


COVIA HOLDINGS: Hires Jackson Walker as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Covia Holdings Corporation and its affiliates seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to
employ Jackson Walker LLP.

Jackson Walker will serve as co-counsel with Kirkland & Ellis LLP
and Kirkland & Ellis International LLP, the other law firms tapped
to handle Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.  The firm will also handle
matters where Kirkland & Ellis cannot represent Debtors due to a
conflict of interest.

The firm's services will be provided mainly by Matthew Cavenaugh,
Esq., who will be paid at the rate of $750 per hour.  The rates for
other restructuring attorneys range from $445 to $895 an hour while
paraprofessional rates range from $175 to $185 an hour.

Debtors paid the firm a retainer in the amount of $148,076.

Jackson Walker is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Matthew D. Cavenaugh, Esq.
     Jackson Walker LLP
     1401 McKinney St., Suite 1900
     Houston, TX 77010
     Phone: (713) 752-4284
     Email: mcavenaugh@jw.com

                     Covia Holdings Corporation

Independence, Ohio-based Covia Holdings Corporation provides
diversified mineral-based and material solutions for the energy
and
industrial markets.  It produces a specialized range of industrial
materials for use in the glass, ceramics, coatings, foundry,
polymers, construction, water filtration, sports and recreation,
and oil and gas markets.  Visit http://www.coviacorp.comfor more
information.

Covia Holdings and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-33295) on June 29, 2020.  At
the
time of the filing, Debtors disclosed $2,504,740,814 in
assets and $1,903,952,839 in liabilities.  

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the cases.

Debtors have tapped Kirkland & Ellis, LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International, LLP as legal counsel; Jackson Walker, LLP as
co-counsel; Kobre & Kim, LLP as special litigation counsel; PJT
Partners, LP as investment banker; Alipartners, LLP as financial
advisor; and Prime Clerk, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors in Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.


CRESTVIEW HOSPITALITY: Case Summary & 6 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Crestview Hospitality LLC
        900 Southcrest Drive
        Crestview, FL 32536

Business Description: Crestview Hospitality is the owner of fee
                      simple title to a 75-room comfort inn &
                      suites hotel, having an appraised value of
                      $4.10 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Florida

Case No.: 20-30704

Debtor's Counsel: J. Steven Ford, Esq.
                  WILSON, HARRELL, FARRINGTON, FORD, ET AL
                  107 S. Palafox Street
                  Pensacola, FL 32502
                  Tel: 850-438-1111
                  Email: jsf@whsf-law.com; amanda@whsf-law.com

Total Assets: $4,939,804

Total Liabilities: $3,790,327

The petition was signed by Martha S. Colbert, manager.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's six unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                    https://tinyurl.com/yxpj8p2y


CWGS ENTERPRISES: Moody's Upgrades CFR to B2, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded ratings of CWGS Enterprises,
LLC, including the Corporate Family rating, which was upgraded to
B2 from B3, and the speculative grade liquidity rating was upgraded
to SGL-2 from SGL-3. The outlook was changed to stable from
negative.

"Today's rating action reflects the rebound in Camping World's
operating performance as RV demand recovered dramatically from the
late-March, early-April softness, with the result, the company
posted operating income growth of over 100%, which in turn reduced
leverage below 5 times and improved interest coverage to around 2
times," stated Moody's Vice President Charlie O'Shea. "Liquidity is
good, with cash of $228 million and floorplan offset availability
of $217 million at the end of Q2, and Moody's expects these
favorable trends in operating performance to continue in the
remainder of 2020," continued O'Shea. "That said, Moody's believes
more normalized consumer spending patterns will return in 2021
which may result in lower demand trends for RVs. However, there is
cushion at the current quantitative profile to withstand a
reasonable level of stress."

Upgrades:

Issuer: CWGS Enterprises, LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B2-PD from B3-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-3

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B2 from B3

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Upgraded to B2 (LGD4) from B3
(LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: CWGS Enterprises, LLC

Outlook, Changed to Stable from Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Camping World's B2 rating considers its improved quantitative
credit profile, industry fundamentals that rebounded quickly from
pandemic-related softness, its leading market position within the
recreational vehicle segment, its flexible business model that
provides multiple sources of revenue, with retail sales, membership
sales, and parts and accessories through its dealership and retail
networks, as well as the risks inherent with its acquisition-based
growth strategy. The rating is also supported by Camping World's
good liquidity supported by its $228 million cash balance and
floorplan availability of $217 million, with meaningful maturities
long-dated.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that the recent
improvement is largely sustainable and that Camping World will be
able to maintain credit metrics in line with its ratings when more
normalized consumer demand returns. The stable outlook also
reflects that the company has flexibility surrounding its mix
between new and used vehicles, as well as the fairly predictable
profit streams from Good Sam such that it can limit the potential
downsides that could result from a potentially lingering demand
"shock."

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Ratings could be downgraded if, due to either weakness in operating
performance or financial policy decisions, debt/EBITDA rose above
6.5 times or EBITA/interest falls below 2 times, or if liquidity
were to weaken. Ratings could be upgraded if operating performance
continues to improve such that debt/EBITDA was maintained around
4.5x times and EBIT/interest was sustained above 2.5 times, and
good liquidity was maintained.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.

CWGS Enterprises, LLC operates businesses predominantly involved in
the recreational vehicle industry including: (1) FreedomRoads RV
dealerships, which sells new and used RVs, parts, and services
under the Camping World brand name (2) Membership Services,
including Good Sam, which sells club membership, products, services
and publications to RV owners, and (3) Retail, which includes
Camping World retail stores that provide merchandise and services
to RV users, as well as Gander Mountain stores. Fiscal year-end
2019 revenues were around $4.9 billion.


DALLAS TRADING: Bank of the West Objects to Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Secured creditor Bank of the West objects to the Disclosure
Statement of Debtor Dallas Trading Enterprises, Inc.

Bank of the West asserts that:

   * The Disclosure Statement should explain how the Debtor
calculates what it believes is owing.  Also, the Disclosure
Statement should address the impact on the Plan and the treatment
of Bank of the West if its claim is allowed as filed.

   * The Disclosure Statement provides Bank of the West was granted
an allowed secured claim in the amount of $310,000 in the Debtor's
prior bankruptcy case. The correct amount was $381,680.

   * The Disclosure Statement provides a value of $350,000 for the
Debtor's real property. The Debtor should disclose the basis for
its valuation.

   * Bank of the West will show the Debtor was also not able to
make the required payments on the restructured debt.  The
Disclosure Statement should explain whether the Debtor intends to
take action to improve its income or reduce its expenses.

A full-text copy of Bank of the West's objection dated July 14,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4ns5tpu from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

Attorneys for Bank of the West:

         KEMP SMITH LLP
         P.O. Box 2800
         El Paso, Texas 79999-2800
         Tel: 915.533.4424
         Fax: 915.546.5360

                About Dallas Trading Enterprises

Dallas Trading Enterprises, Inc., sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 20-60209) on
March 23, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was
estimated to have assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and
liabilities of the same range.  Judge Ronald B. King oversees the
case.  The Debtor tapped Eric A. Liepins, P.C., as its legal
counsel.


DREAM BIG: McDonald's Offers $5M for Substantially All Assets
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dream Big Restaurants, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of South Carolina to authorize the sale of substantially
all of its assets to McDonald's for $5 million.

The Debtor operates seven McDonald's franchises in Greenville and
Greer, South Carolina from land leased from McDonald's.  It employs
approximately 284 people at these locations.

The franchise agreement for store no. 1167 in Greenville, South
Carolina, which employs approximately 40 people, expired in May
2020 and has been subsequently extended on a short-term basis by
agreement of the parties in order to effectuate a sale of the
location as an operating McDonald's franchise.  There is no
guaranty that further extensions will be granted by McDonald's.

The deadline to assume or reject the operator's leases from
McDonald's has also been extended several times to accommodate a
reorganization or sale of the franchises and is set to expire on
July 31, 2020.  There is no guaranty that McDonald's will authorize
further extension of the deadline to assume or reject the operating
leases.

Furthermore, the coronavirus pandemic has had a negative effect on
the Debtor's operations.  The Debtor has experienced an overall
16.38% decline in sales and generated losses during April and May
2020.  It is concerned that it may encounter a liquidity crisis in
the increasingly likely event that the coronavirus pandemic
continues.

In order to maximize the value of its assets, the Debtor marketed
its assets to third parties both prior to and after the Petition
Date.  None of the prepetition communications evolved beyond mere
discussions.  None of the Debtor's post-petition communications
with any potential suitors resulted in a purchase offer.  Despite
Debtor's marketing efforts, McDonald's made the only offer to
purchase the restaurants received by the Debtor.

After thorough and detailed negotiations, McDonald's has offered to
purchase the seven remaining restaurants as going concerns
(exclusive of cash and accounts receivable) in exchange for $5
million plus waiver of approximately $1.1 million in pre-petition
unsecured claims and a portion of amounts it claims are due from
the post-petition period.  The transaction will include a broad
mutual release of McDonald's from the Debtor and its principals and
abroad release of the Debtor and its principals by McDonald's.

McDonald's valued the Debtor's restaurants using a discounted cash
flow method less anticipated capital expenses at $2.77 million.  It
is the Debtor's understanding that McDonald's franchises generally
trade in the marketplace as going concerns, on a store-by-store
basis, at a multiple of five times trailing 12 months’ earnings
before interest tax depreciation and amortization less anticipated
capital improvements.  The Debtor estimates that the value of the
seven remaining franchises under this valuation methodology to be
approximately $2.83 million.

The Debtor attributes the increase in value over and above the
seven restaurants' $2.77 million going concern value to the
Release.

The sale of the seven remaining restaurants as going concerns to
McDonald's provides the highest and best value for the Debtor's
assets under the circumstances.  Upon information and belief, the
Bank has expressed its intention to credit bid to McDonald's.

The Debtor filed a Second Amended Combined Plan of Liquidation and
Disclosure Statement that contemplates a sale of the franchises to
McDonald's consistent with the sale proposed in the Sale Motion.
The Sale Motion is filed in the alternative and will be withdrawn
if the Plan is confirmed.

Through the Sale Motion, the Debtor asks that the Court enters an
order (i) authorizing the sale of substantially all of its assets
to McDonald's, free and clear of all liens, claims, interests, and
encumbrances, with such liens, claims, interest, and encumbrances
transferring to the proceeds of the sale; and (2) granting such
other relief as is just and equitable.

Finally, the Debtor asks that the proposed sale be permitted to
conclude immediately following entry of any order of the Court
approving the sale.  In particular, the offer from McDonald's of $5
million for the Debtor's assets is the highest and best offer the
Debtor received.  Additionally, assuring that the sale closes
promptly, it will maximize value to be distributed.  Therefore, the
Debtor believes that cause exists for modification of the time
periods set forth in FRBP 6004(h) and 6006(d).

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yd498kwq from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                  About Dream Big Restaurants

Dream Big Restaurants LLC operates McDonald's restaurant
franchises
at eight locations in Greenville and Greer, S.C.

Dream Big Restaurants sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.S.C.
Case No. 19-05090) on Sept. 27, 2019, in Spartanburg, S.C.  In the
petition signed by Phillip K. Wilkins, authorized member, the
Debtor was estimated to have assets at $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.  Judge Helen E.
Burris oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped Schafer and Weiner,
PLLC as its general bankruptcy counsel, and Skinner Law Firm, LLC
as its local counsel.



EARTH FARE: Buyer Restart Operations at 3 Stores
------------------------------------------------
Grocery Dive reports that supermarket chain Earth Fare is back in
operations after being purchased by group of investors.

A group of investors that purchased four Earth Fare supermarkets in
a bankruptcy auction earlier this year plans to open a new store in
Christiansburg, Virginia, early next year, according to a press
release sent to Grocery Dive.

The new location is in addition to three Earth Fare stores recently
opened in Asheville and Boone, North Carolina, and Roanoke,
Virginia, where three of the four locations it bought at the
auction were located. The ownership group, helmed by Randy Talley,
a co-founder of the original Earth Fare, also acquired a store in
Athens, Georgia, during the bankruptcy auction.

The Christiansburg Earth Fare store, which will anchor a
redeveloped shopping center, will feature a new design but hold
onto touches that helped the former Earth Fare chain build a
following among devotees of the natural foods the brand became
known for, such as a "Boot List" of banned ingredients, according
to the press release.

Earth Fare's reemergence continues a fast-paced saga that has seen
the natural foods brand's fortunes rise and fall amid an
unforgiving and highly competitive retail environment.

The announcement by the grocer's new backers that they are building
a store with a refreshed design comes just a few months after the
former owners of the supermarket chain called it quits under an
insurmountable debt load brought on by what industry experts said
was an overly aggressive effort to expand.

In the announcement, Earth Fare said the new store will retain some
of the most popular elements of the former chain. This includes
healthy foods made by a "healthy lifestyle chef," natural meats and
products that adhere to a strict list of natural ingredients. The
focus is on crafting an inviting atmosphere that also clearly
distinguishes the store as a health destination.

"We don't want to look or feel like a big-box warehouse retailer,
but more an extension of your home," Talley said in a statement.

The new store will anchor a development that includes tenants like
Chipotle, Orangetheory Fitness and Starbucks.

News that the grocer planned to cease operations came just a year
after the company opened its 50th store and said it would open 50
more locations by 2024. Instead of embarking on that path, the
company said Feb. 3 that it would close all of its locations and
look to sell off its assets. The next day, Earth Fare entered
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, setting off the process that led
Talley and his partners to launch their bid to resuscitate the
brand.

Talley, along with partners including Asheville businessman Dennis
Hulsing, bid $1.9 million for the four Earth Fare stores it
acquired in the bankruptcy auction. Other Earth Fare locations went
to Whole Foods, Winn-Dixie and Aldi.

The original Earth Fare enterprise, which came to life in North
Carolina in 1975 as a health-food store and took on the Earth Fare
name in 1994, attracted customers through a community-minded
approach to selling natural and organic foods. The company was
purchased in 2006 by a private equity firm, Monitor Clipper
Partners, which sold control of the grocer to Oak Hill Capital
Partners in 2012. Under Oak Hill, Earth Fare pressed ahead with its
ill-fated expansion plan.

The former Earth Fare's demise coincided with the bankruptcies of
Lucky's Market and Fairway Market, which also ran into trouble as
they tried to grow. Lucky's couldn't hold its own when it tried to
enter new markets after thriving in Colorado, and Fairway Market
ran into trouble when it sought to export its urban-centric concept
from New York City to the region's suburbs.

                        About Earth Fare

Founded in 1975 in Asheville, N.C., Earth Fare, Inc. --
http://www.earthfare.com/-- is a natural and organic food retailer
with locations across 10 states. It offers groceries and wellness
and beauty products.

Earth Fare and its affiliate, EF Investment Holdings, Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 20-10256) on Feb. 4, 2020.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtors each disclosed assets of between $100 million
and $500 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Karen B. Owens oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as legal
counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial and restructuring
advisor; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC as claims,
solicitation and balloting agent. Malfitano Advisors, LLC provides
disposition advisory services to the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed five creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11
cases of Earth Fare, Inc. and EF Investment Holdings, Inc. The
Committee retained Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, as
counsel,and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as financial
advisor.


ELK PETROLEUM: Liquidation Plan Confirmed by Bankruptcy Court
-------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Gill, writing for Bloomberg News, reports that the
bankruptcy court has confirmed the liquidation plan of Elk
Petroleum.

Elk Petroleum Inc.'s Chapter 11 case is nearing its end with a
Delaware bankruptcy judge's conditional approval of its liquidation
plan.

Judge Laurie S. Silverstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware said she'd confirm the plan once the oil and
gas company submits a few promised changes to the proposed approval
order.

Under the plan, whatever assets remain after Elk Petroleum's asset
sales, which took place earlier in the case, will be transferred to
a liquidation trust, along with possible claims to claw back
transfers made prior to the bankruptcy filing.

                      About Elk Petroleum

Elk Petroleum Inc. -- https://www.elkpet.com/ -- is an oil and gas
company specializing in enhanced oil recovery (EOR).

Elk Petroleum and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11157) on
May 22, 2019. At the time of the filing, Elk Petroleum estimated
assets of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of
less than $50,000. The petition was signed by Scott M. Pinsonnault,
chief restructuring officer.

The Debtors tapped Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP and Womble Bond
Dickinson (US) LLP as legal counsel; Ankura Consulting Group, LLC,
as restructuring advisor; Seaport Global Securities LLC as
investment banker; Opportune LLP as valuation analysis provider;
and Bankruptcy Management Solutions, Inc., as claims and noticing
agent.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, appointed a
committee of preferred equity security holders on June 19, 2019.
The equity committee tapped Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as
its legal counsel, and Teneo Capital Llc as its financial advisor
and investment banker.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtors' cases.



FERRELLGAS LP: $500-Mil. Unsecured Notes Cast Going Concern Doubt
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ferrellgas, L.P. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $7,720,000 on $412,130,000 of total
revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2020, compared to a
net earnings of $29,554,000 on $479,625,000 of total revenues for
the same period in 2019.

At April 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $1,720,281,000,
total liabilities of $2,508,524,000, and $788,243,000 in total
partners' deficit.

Ferrellgas Partners has $357.0 million in unsecured notes due June
15, 2020 that are classified as current in its condensed
consolidated financial statements.  Ferrellgas Partners' ability to
restructure, refinance or otherwise satisfy these notes is directly
impacted by the cash flows of Ferrellgas, L.P. The ability of
Ferrellgas Partners to restructure or refinance these notes is
uncertain considering the level of other outstanding indebtedness.
Additionally, Ferrellgas, L.P. has $500.0 million in unsecured
notes due May 1, 2021, which will be reclassified from long-term to
current during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.  Given these
concerns, Ferrellgas, L.P., believes there is substantial doubt
about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.
Ferrellgas has engaged Moelis & Company LLC as its financial
advisor and the law firm of Squire Patton Boggs LLP to assist with
its ongoing process to address its upcoming debt maturities.  The
outcome of Ferrellgas' debt reduction strategy continues to remain
uncertain.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/DFIPZe

Ferrellgas, L.P. engages in the retail distribution of propane and
related equipment sales.  Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., a publicly
traded limited partnership, holds an approximate 99% limited
partner interest in, and consolidates, Ferrellgas, L.P.  The
Company is headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas.



FERRELLGAS PARTNERS: Debt Maturities Cast Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $15,471,000 on $412,130,000 of total
revenues for the three months ended April 30, 2020, compared to a
net earnings of $20,760,000 on $479,625,000 of total revenues for
the same period in 2019.

At April 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $1,720,339,000,
total liabilities of $2,877,156,000, and $1,156,817,000 in total
partners' deficit.

Ferrellgas Partners has $357.0 million in unsecured notes due June
15, 2020 that are classified as current in the condensed
consolidated financial statements.  The ability of Ferrellgas
Partners to restructure, refinance or otherwise satisfy these notes
is uncertain considering the level of other outstanding
indebtedness.  Given these concerns, Ferrellgas Partners believes
there is substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue
as a going concern.  Ferrellgas has engaged Moelis & Company LLC as
its financial advisor and the law firm of Squire Patton Boggs LLP
to assist in the Company's ongoing process to address its upcoming
debt maturities.  The outcome of Ferrellgas' debt reduction
strategy continues to remain uncertain.

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/DFIPZe

Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. distributes and sells propane and related
equipment and supplies. The company transports propane to propane
distribution locations, tanks on customers' premises, or to
portable propane tanks delivered to retailers. Ferrellgas Partners,
L.P. was founded in 1939 and is headquartered in Overland Park,
Kansas.




FIELDWOOD ENERGY: Clark Hill Represents Zurich American, 2 Others
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Clark Hill Strasburger submitted a verified
statement to disclose that it is representing Zurich American
Insurance Company, Seitel Data, Ltd. and Martin Energy Services,
LLC in the Chapter 11 cases of Fieldwood Energy, LLC, et al.

As of Aug. 12, 2020, each creditor and their disclosable economic
interests are:

Zurich American Insurance Company
P O Box 968038
Schaumburg, Illinois 60196

* Surety Bonds
* Prinicipal amount of Claim: $300,000,000.00

Martin Energy Services, LLC
Three Riverway, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77056

* Provided fuels, lubricants and other services
* Prinicipal amount of Claim: $138,932.73

Seitel Data, Ltd.
10811 S. Westview Circle Dr.
#100, Building C
Houston, TX 77043

* Seismic data technology

Clark Hill reserves the right to amend this Verified Statement as
necessary.

Counsel for Zurich American Insurance Company, Seitel Data, Ltd.
and Martin Energy Services, LLC can be reached at:

          CLARK HILL STRASBURGER
          Duane J. Brescia, Esq.
          720 Brazos, Suite 700
          Austin, TX 78701
          Tel: 512.499.3600
          Fax: 512.499.3660
          Email: dbrescia@clarkhill.com

          Robert P. Franke, Esq.
          Audrey Hornisher, Esq.
          901 Main St., Suite 6000
          Dallas, TX 75202
          Tel: 214.651.4300
          Fax: 214.651.4330
          Email: bfranke@clarkhill.com
                 ahornisher@clarkhill.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/n7rsOs

                    About Fieldwood Energy

Fieldwood Energy -- https://www.fieldwoodenergy.com/ -- is a
portfolio company of Riverstone Holdings focused on acquiring and
developing conventional assets, primarily in the Gulf of Mexico
region.  It is the largest operator in the Gulf of Mexico owning an
interest in approximately 500 leases covering over 2 million gross
acres with 1,000 wells and 750 employees.

Fieldwood Energy LLC and its 13 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 18-30648) on Feb. 15,
2018, with a prepackaged plan that would deleverage $3.286 billion
of funded by $1.626 billion.

Fieldwood was estimated to have $1 billion to $10 billion in assets
and debt.

The Company has engaged Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as its legal
counsel, Evercore Group LLC as its financial advisor, and Opportune
LLP as its restructuring advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.

The First Lien Group has engaged O'Melveny & Myers LLP as its
legal
counsel and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as its financial
advisor.
The RBL Lenders have engaged Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP as its
legal counsel and RPA Advisors, LLC as its financial advisor.  The
Cross-Holder Group has engaged Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as its
legal counsel and PJT Partners LP as its financial advisor.
Riverstone has engaged Vinson & Elkins LLP as its legal counsel
and
Perella Weinberg Partners as its financial advisor.


FIELDWOOD ENERGY: Davis Polk, Haynes Represent Secured Lender Group
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of Fieldwood Energy LLC, et al., the law
firms of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Haynes and Boone, LLP
submitted a verified statement under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules
of Bankruptcy Procedure, to disclose that they are representing the
Ad Hoc Group of Secured Lenders.

The Ad Hoc Group of Secured Lenders formed by certain lenders under
(i) that certain Amended and Restated First Lien Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2018, among Fieldwood Energy Inc.,
Fieldwood, as the borrower, the lenders party thereto and Cantor
Fitzgerald Securities, as administrative agent and collateral agent
and/or (ii) that certain Amended and Restated Second Lien Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2018, among Holdings, Fieldwood,
as the borrower, the lenders party thereto and Cortland Capital
Market Services LLC, as administrative agent and collateral agent,
some Members of which also committed to provide a superpriority,
secured debtor-in-possession credit facility pursuant to that
certain Senior Secured Superpriority Debtor-In-Possession Term Loan
Credit Agreement to be entered into by and among Holdings,
Fieldwood, as the borrower, the lenders party thereto and Cantor
Fitzgerald Securities, as administrative agent and collateral
agent.

In or around March 2020, the Ad Hoc Group of Secured Lenders
engaged Davis Polk to represent it in connection with the Members'
holdings under the Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement and
Prepetition SLTL Credit Agreement. In May 2020, the Ad Hoc Group of
Secured Lenders engaged Haynes and Boone to act as co-counsel in
the Chapter 11 Cases.

Davis Polk represents only the Ad Hoc Group of Secured Lenders. As
of the date of this Statement, Haynes and Boone represents the Ad
Hoc Group of Secured Lenders and the DIP Agent. Other than Haynes
and Boone's representation of the DIP Agent, Counsel does not
represent or purport to represent any entities other than the Ad
Hoc Group of Secured Lenders in connection with the Chapter 11
Cases. In addition, the Ad Hoc Group of Secured Lenders does not
claim or purport to represent any other entity and undertakes no
duties or obligations to any entity.

As of Aug. 10, 2020, members of the Ad Hoc Group of Secured Lenders
and their disclosable economic interests are:

AEGON USA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LLC
227 W. Monroe Suite 6000
Chicago, IL 60606

* $28,179,921.51 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement

* $1,206,759.32 in aggregate principal amount of DIP backstop
  commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement

CIFC ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
875 3rd Avenue 24th Floor
New York, NY 10022

* $29,014,126.86 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement

* $13,049,999.99 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition SLTL Credit Agreement

COHANZICK MANAGEMENT, LLC
427 Bedford Road Suite 230
Pleasantville, NY 10570

* $27,000,000.00 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  First Lien Credit Agreement

* $8,798,317.61 in aggregate principal amount of DIP backstop
  commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement

EATON VANCE MANAGEMENT/BOSTON MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
2 International Place 9th Floor
Boston, MA 02110

* $84,707,237.40 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement

* $12,954,179.78 in aggregate principal amount of DIP backstop
  commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement

* 589,166 shares of Holdings stock

FRANKLIN ADVISERS, INC.
1 Franklin Parkway Building 970, 1st Floor
San Mateo, CA 94403

* $184,985,251.68 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement

* $17,984,684.20 in aggregate principal amount of DIP backstop
  commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement

INVESCO SENIOR SECURED MANAGEMENT, INC.
1166 Avenue of the Americas 26th Floor
New York, NY 10036

* $272,238,543.79 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement

* $68,659,093.37 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition SLTL Credit Agreement

* $35,272,631.49 in aggregate principal amount of DIP backstop
  commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement

* 1,103,940 shares of Holdings stock

SI CAPITAL COMMERCIAL FINANCE, LLC
38955 Hills Tech Drive
Farmington Hills, MI 48331

* $32,203,593.61 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement

* $3,974,420.23 in aggregate principal amount of DIP backstop
  commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement

SYMPHONY ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
555 California Street Suite 3100
San Francisco, CA

* $117,364,280.47 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition FLTL Credit Agreement

* $51,462,152.83 in aggregate principal amount of loans under the
  Prepetition SLTL Credit Agreement

* $19,809,007.37 in aggregate principal amount of DIP backstop
  commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement

* 263,272 shares of Holdings stock

Counsel for the Ad Hoc Group of Secured Lenders can be reached at:

          DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
          Damian S. Schaible, Esq.
          Natasha Tsiouris, Esq.
          Josh Sturm, Esq.
          450 Lexington Avenue
          New York, NY 10017
          Telephone: (212) 450-4000
          Facsimile: (212) 701-5800
          Email: damian.schaible@davispolk.com
                 natasha.tsiouris@davispolk.com
                 joshua.sturm@davispolk.com

             - and -

          HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
          Charles A. Beckham, Jr., Esq.
          Martha Wyrick, Esq.
          1221 McKinney Street, Suite 4000
          Houston, TX 77010
          Telephone: (713) 547-2000
          Facsimile: (713) 547-2600
          Email: charles.beckham@haynesboone.com
                 martha.wyrick@haynesboone.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/TNiHo2 and https://is.gd/FsO33C

                    About Fieldwood Energy

Fieldwood Energy -- https://www.fieldwoodenergy.com/ -- is a
portfolio company of Riverstone Holdings focused on acquiring and
developing conventional assets, primarily in the Gulf of Mexico
region.  It is the largest operator in the Gulf of Mexico owning an
interest in approximately 500 leases covering over 2 million gross
acres with 1,000 wells and 750 employees.

Fieldwood Energy LLC and its 13 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 18-30648) on Feb. 15,
2018, with a prepackaged plan that would deleverage $3.286 billion
of funded by $1.626 billion.

Fieldwood estimated $1 billion to $10 billion in assets and debt.

The Company has engaged Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as its legal
counsel, Evercore Group LLC as its financial advisor, and Opportune
LLP as its restructuring advisor.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.

The First Lien Group has engaged O'Melveny & Myers LLP as its
legal
counsel and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as its financial advisor.

The RBL Lenders have engaged Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP as its
legal counsel and RPA Advisors, LLC as its financial advisor.  The
Cross-Holder Group has engaged Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as its
legal counsel and PJT Partners LP as its financial advisor.
Riverstone has engaged Vinson & Elkins LLP as its legal counsel
and
Perella Weinberg Partners as its financial advisor.



FIVE DREAMS: J Tucker Buying Acworth Property for $2.5 Million
--------------------------------------------------------------
Five Dreams Holdings, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Georgia to authorize the sale of real property
referred to as the "Front Parcel" located at 5742 Bells Ferry Road,
Acworth, Georgia, approximately 9.15 Acres, to J Tucker Development
Partners, Inc. for $2.5 million.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Aug. 19, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.  

The Debtor is a Georgia corporation which owns the Real Property.
The Buyer has made an offer to purchase the Real Property.  The
parties have executed their Contract for the Purchase and Sale of
Developed Lots.

As set forth in the Contract, the Buyer's offer encompasses paying
$2.5 million inclusive of earnest money deposits as follows: (1)
$10,000 earnest money deposit within five days of the Contract's
acceptance and (2) $5,000 additional earnest money if a 30-day
extension of the closing period is requested.  The obligations of
Debtor under the Contract are contingent upon approval by the
Court.  

The Debtor is separately filing an Application to Employ Waverly
Thornton with Virtual Properties Realty as Real Estate Agent,
asking approval to employ Agent as its Agent with respect to the
Contract.  The Contract provides that Mike Stone represents the
Buyer as its agent, and Waverly Thornton represents Debtor as its
agent.  Waverly Thornton approached the Debtor regarding the
interested Buyer.  

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has spent considerable time and
effort marketing the Real Property to various potential buyers.  It
believes that the transaction represents the highest and best offer
available and that the Purchase Price represents the true value of
the Real Property.  The Debtor anticipates that the first priority
lien holder, Morris Bank, will consent to the sale of the Real
Property and the Real Property may be sold over the objection of
any asserted junior secured claims.

On July 23, 2019, Morris Bank filed proof of claim number 4,
asserting a secured claim in the amount of $5,158,758 consisting of
(i) principal in the amount of $4,990,806 (ii) unpaid interest in
the amount of $133,436, (iii) unpaid late charges in the amount of
$11,992, (vi) other fees of $276, and (v) SBA prepayment insurance
of $22,968, with interest accruing after June 10, 2019 at the per
diem rate of $1,094 regarding Morris Bank loan number 4003270500.
Such indebtedness is evidenced by the SBA Note regarding SBA Loan #
83252950-2 dated Aug. 17, 2016, in the original loan amount of $5
million naming the Debtor and Five Dreams Management, LLC as
borrowers and Morris Bank as the lender and guaranteed by Myrtle
Janice Stewart pursuant to SBA guarantee of ever date thereof.   

On July 23, 2019, Morris Bank filed proof of claim number 5,
asserting a secured claim in the amount of $3,588,606 consisting of
(i) principal in the amount of $3,526,178, (ii) unpaid interest in
the amount of $56,429, and (iii) unpaid late charges in the amount
of $6,000, with interest accruing after June 10, 2019 at the per
diem rate of $570.  Such indebtedness is evidenced by the
Commercial Promissory Note regarding loan number 4005014400 dated
May 30, 2018 in the principal amount of $3,511,356 naming the
Debtor and Five Dreams Management, LLC as the borrowers and Morris
Bank as the Lender and guaranteed by Myrtle Janice Stewart pursuant
to the Unlimited Commercial Guaranty of ever date thereof.  

On July 23, 2019, Morris Bank filed proof of claim number 6,
asserting a secured claim in the amount of $1,292,517 consisting of
(i) principal in the amount of $1,264,815 (ii) unpaid interest in
the amount of $25,561, and (iii) unpaid late charges in the amount
of $2,140, with interest accruing after June 10, 2019 at the per
diem rate of $225.  Such indebtedness is evidenced by the
Commercial Line of Credit Agreement and Renewal Agreement regarding
loan number 4005013400, dated Oct. 1, 2018, in the original line of
credit amount of $1,264,815 naming Myrtle Janice Stewart as
borrower and for which Debtor pledged collateral.  The total
asserted Morris Bank Secured Claim is $10,039,881.

To Secured the Morris Bank Secured Claim, Morris Bank asserts a
first priority lien against the Real Property as more particularly
described in the (1) the Deed to Secure Debt recorded Aug. 19, 2016
in the land records of Cherokee County Georgia in Deed Book 14010
commencing at Page 237, as modified by the Modification of Deed to
Secure Debt recorded May 2, 2017 in said land records in Deed Book
14173, commencing at Page 2965; (2) Assignment of Lease and Rents
recorded Aug. 19, 2016 in said land records in deed book 14010
commencing at page 225 and (3) UCC Financing Statement recorded and
filed Aug. 19, 2016 in the UCC index of Laurens County, Georgia as
File No. 087-2016-1315 and in Deed  Book 14010 page 259 of the
Cherokee County land records.

The Cherokee County Tax Commissioner asserts claims against the
Real Property in an undetermined amount for 2018, 2019 and 2020 ad
valorem property taxes.  Any ad valorem property taxes owed on the
Real Property will be paid at closing.

The Debtor is aware of various asserted junior liens against the
Property, liens to which the Debtor disputes, including: (i)
Crossroads Leasing, LLC, Book 828 Pg 410; filed 7/27/2017, asserted
against Tract I - 2.08 acres, map/parcel no. 15N06 105; Tract II -
14.3 acres map/parcel no. 15N06 104; Tract III - 4.2 acres
map/parcel no 15N06 103; scheduled in the amount of $58,795; (ii)
Vertical Earth, Inc., Book 828 Pg 968; filed 8/16/2017; asserted
against Tract I - 2.08 acres, map/parcel no. 15N06 105; Tract II -
14.3 acres map/parcel no. 15N06 104; Tract III - 4.2 acres
map/parcel no 15N06 103; scheduled in the amount of $296,394, and
proof of claim in the amount of $296,394; and (iii) Vertical Earth,
Inc., Lien Book 830 Pg 1325; filed 2/09/2018, asserted against
Tract I - 2.08 acres, map/parcel no. 15N06 105; Tract II - 14.3
acres map/parcel no. 15N06 104; Tract III - 4.2 acres map/parcel no
15N06 103; scheduled in the amount of $296,394, and proof of claim
in the amount of $296,394.

The Asserted Junior Liens are junior to the ad valorem claims of
the Cherokee County Tax Commissioner and Morris Bank's Secured
Claim.  Further, no action has been initiated on certain of said
Asserted Junior Liens, which are claims of lien.  With respect to
any claim of lien for which an action was commenced, any such
action has not be adjudicated nor resulted in a judgment against
the Debtor.  

The Debtor asks authority to sell the Real Property as described
herein free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances, and interests
for the Purchase Price.  Additionally, it asks permission to (i)
disburse the Purchase Price as provided with liens attaching to the
Sales Proceeds; and (ii) take such action as necessary to
effectuate the terms of the Contract.  It asks that: (a) the Court
waive any stay pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 6004 or otherwise; and
(b) any order approving the sale of the Real Property be effective
immediately upon entry.

The Debtor asks that it be authorized to use and distribute the
Sales Proceeds as follows: (a) payment of all customary closing
costs, if any, including broker's commissions (i.e. $100,000 for
Waverly Thornton and $100,000 for Mike Stone); and next (b)
outstanding ad valorem property taxes regarding the Real Property
(including a pro-rated share of the taxes in the year of the
closing) and any other amounts customarily attributable to sellers
in Georgia; and next (c) the balance of the Purchase Price to
Morris Bank.

The Debtor believes the proposal represents the highest and best
offer available as evidenced by its considerable effort to market
the Real Property to potential buyers.  

A copy of the Contract is available at https://tinyurl.com/y7tec8xa
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                     About Five Dreams Holdings

Five Dreams Holdings, LLC filed as a single asset real estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Five Dreams Holdings filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-58641) on June 3,
2019. In the petition signed by Brian Stewart, manager, the Debtor
estimated $50,000 in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.  Judge Sage M. Sigler oversees the case.  Leslie M.
Pineyro, Esq., at Jones & Walden, LLC, represents Debtor as
counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
Debtor's bankruptcy case.

Debtor filed its Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement on Aug.
30, 2019.



FRE 355 INVESTMENT: Unsec. Creditors to Have 9.15% Recovery in Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors FRE 355 Investment Group, LLC, d/b/a FRE 355 and Mora
House, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of California, Division 5, a Chapter 11 Plan and a
Disclosure Statement on July 10, 2020.

The Debtors will advertise, market and close sales of the Mora
House and Mora Lot within 6 months after the Effective Date of the
Plan, the Initial Marketing Period, to pay secured claimants of
both properties in full and to pay a projected dividend of 9.15% to
unsecured claimants.  If S&R receives a $500,000 principal paydown
under the Addendum to Promissory Note then (1) S&R shall release
its lien against the Mora Lot, and (2) the Debtors shall have the
Extended Marketing Period of six additional months to close sales
of the Mora House and Mora Lot. The Blanchard Trust shall retain
without modification the right to advance $500,000 under the
Addendum to Promissory Note to cause the release of the S&R lien
from the Mora Lot.

Class 3A General Unsecured Claims of FRE 355 will receive payment
of the allowed amount of their claims, without interest, from the
net proceeds from sale of the Mora House after the full payment of
all secured and priority claims six months after the Effective
Date, unless S&R receives a $500,000 principal paydown under the
Addendum to Promissory Note, in which case payment will be made
twelve months after the Effective Date or at such time that the
Mora House and Mora Lot are sold, whichever is sooner.

Class 3B General Unsecured Claims of Mora House will receive a pro
rata distribution on the allowed amount of their claims, without
interest, from the net proceeds from sale of the Mora Lot after the
full payment of all secured and priority claims. Payment shall be
made six months after the Effective Date, unless S&R receives a
$500,000 principal paydown under the Addendum to Promissory Note,
in which case payment shall be made twelve months after the
Effective Date or at such time that the Mora House and Mora Lot are
sold, whichever is sooner.

Class 4A Equity Interests in FRE 355 and Class 4B Equity Interests
in Mora House will be retained.

Sales of the Mora House and Mora Lot if closed within the initial
marketing period or extended marketing period would leave $430,606
in net proceeds for distribution to unsecured creditors in Classes
3A and 3B. Subtracting the $25,663 for Class 3A leaves $404,943 for
distribution to creditors.  Even if the two properties could be
sold for list price, a Chapter 7 would yield less than the
projected Chapter 11 dividend.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated July 10, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y9ju2avb from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

The Debtors are represented by:

         Michael W. Malter, Esq. ID #96533
         Robert G. Harris, Esq. ID #124678
         Julie H. Rome-Banks, Esq. ID #142364
         Binder & Malter, LLP
         2775 Park Avenue
         Santa Clara, CA 95050
         Telephone: (408) 295-1700
         Facsimile: (408) 295-1531
         E-mail: Michael@bindermalter.com
         E-mail: Rob@bindermalter.com
         E-mail: Julie@bindermatler.com

                About FRE 355 Investment Group

FRE 355 Investment Group, LLC, is a Single Asset Real Estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

FRE 355 Investment Group filed a voluntary petition under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 20-50628) on
April 13, 2020.  In the petition signed by Melvin Vaugh, managing
member, the Debtor was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million
in both assets and liabilities.  Michael W. Malter, Esq. at BINDER
& MALTER, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


FREEDOM COMMS: To Revise Disclosure to Settle Disputes with CDTFA
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom Communications, Inc. and its debtor affiliates and the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors responded to the
opposition of the California Department of Tax and Fee
Administration ("CDTFA") to Disclosure Statement for Joint Chapter
11 Plan of Liquidation Proposed by Debtors and Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.

The Debtors and the Committee claim that:

  * The Disclosure Statement Provides Adequate Information in
Support of the Debtors’ “Best Interest of Creditors”
Analysis.

  * The Plan and Disclosure Statement provide that certain
professionals have agreed to limit their recovery on their (senior)
Allowed Professional Fee Claims in order to allow for payment in
full of non-professional administrative claims and priority claims,
and a distribution to Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims.

  * The Debtors and Committee Will Revise the Disclosure Statement
to Provide Details About the Debtors’ Disputes With CDTFA while
the “Retained Rights of Action” Section of the Disclosure
Statement Includes the Debtors’ Potential Claims for Tax
Refunds.

* The Debtors respectfully request that the Disclosure Statement be
approved, as amended hereby, as containing adequate information for
purposes of Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the plan proponents' reply, dated July 7, 2020,
to the opposition of CDTFA, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yc2de22j from PacerMonitor at no charge.

Counsel for Debtors:

           Alan J. Friedman
           Rika M. Kido
           SHULMAN BASTIAN FRIEDMAN & BUI LLP
           100 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 600
           Irvine, California 92618
           Telephone: (949) 340-3400
           Facsimile: (949) 340-3000
           E-mail: AFriedman@shulmanbastian.com
                   RKido@shulmanbastian.com

Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecureds:

            Robert J. Feinstein
            Jeffrey W. Dulberg
            PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
            10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor
            Los Angeles, CA 90067
            Telephone: (310) 277-6910
            Facsimile: (310) 201-0760
            E-mail: rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com
                    jdulberg@pszjlaw.com

                  About Freedom Communications

Headquartered in Santa Ana, Calif., Freedom Communications, Inc.,
owned two daily newspapers -- The Press-Enterprise in Riverside,
California and The Orange County Register in Santa Ana,
California.

Freedom Communications and 24 of its affiliates sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection in California with the intention of selling
their assets to a group of local investors led by Rich Mirman,
Freedom's chief executive officer and publisher.

Freedom Communications, Inc., et al., filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 15-15311) on Nov. 1,
2015. In the petition signed by Richard E. Mirman, the CEO, Freedom
Communications Holdings estimated assets and liabilities in the
range of $10 million to $50 million.

William N. Lobel, Esq., Alan J. Friedman, Esq., Beth E. Gaschen,
Esq., and Christopher J. Green, Esq., at Lobel Weiland Golden
Friedman LLP, serve as the Debtors' counsel.  The Debtors employed
Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP, as general insolvency counsel;
GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group LLC as financial advisor and
consultant; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as the noticing,
claims and balloting/ solicitation agent. FTI Consulting, Inc. was
tapped to review Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)
Claims.

The Debtors tapped Robert J. Feinstein, Esq. and Jeffrey W.
Dulberg, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, as counsel;
and The Law Offices of A. Lavar Taylor LLP as special tax counsel.

                          *    *    *

In April 2016, Freedom Communications completed the sale of its
operating businesses and real estate assets to Digital First Media
Inc., following a bankruptcy auction.  Digital First Media's $51.8
million bid was approved by the Bankruptcy Court in Santa Ana,
after the U.S. Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit
against the highest bidder, Tribune Publishing.  The final sale to
Digital First Media closed on March 31, 2016 for $49.8 million,
according to FTI Capital Advisors, which was retained to conduct a
formal sale process.

Tribune tendered a $56 million bid but the U.S. government argued a
sale to Tribune would give it a monopoly on major newspapers in
Southern California.

First Media publishes the Los Angeles Daily News, Long Beach
Press-Telegram and other Southern California papers. Digital First
Media, a business name of MediaNews Group, offers news reporting
and third party advertising and directory opportunities through its
more than 800 multi-platform products which include web, mobile,
tablet and print.About Freedom Communications

Headquartered in Santa Ana, Calif., Freedom Communications, Inc.,
owned two daily newspapers -- The Press-Enterprise in Riverside,
California and The Orange County Register in Santa Ana,
California.

Freedom Communications and 24 of its affiliates sought Chapter 1
bankruptcy protection in California with the intention of selling
their assets to a group of local investors led by Rich Mirman,
Freedom's chief executive officer and publisher.

Freedom Communications, Inc., et al., filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 15-15311) on Nov. 1,
2015. In the petition signed by Richard E. Mirman, the CEO, Freedom
Communications Holdings estimated assets and liabilities in the
range of $10 million to $50 million.

William N. Lobel, Esq., Alan J. Friedman, Esq., Beth E. Gaschen,
Esq., and Christopher J. Green, Esq., at Lobel Weiland Golden
Friedman LLP, serve as the Debtors' counsel.  The Debtors employed
Shulman Hodges & Bastian LLP, as general insolvency counsel;
GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group LLC as financial advisor and
consultant; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as the noticing,
claims and balloting/ solicitation agent.  FTI Consulting, Inc.,
was tapped to review Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)
Claims.

The Debtors tapped Robert J. Feinstein, Esq. and Jeffrey W.
Dulberg, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, as counsel;
and The Law Offices of A. Lavar Taylor LLP as special tax counsel.


FREEDOM OIL: CarMax Offers $17K for 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom Oil & Gas, Inc. and affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas to authorize them to sell
their 2017 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, VIN 3GCPCNEH6H438238, to
CarMax, Inc. for $17,000, free and clear of liens, claims and
encumbrances.

On May 20, 2020, the Debtors filed a motion asking Court approval
of their asset purchase agreement with Trek TCB Acquisition, LLC
whereby they will sell substantially all of their assets to Trek
after the sale hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020.  Although the
Debtors' other vehicle is among the assets to be sold to Trek, the
Truck made the basis of the Sale Motion is not being sold to Trek.


The Truck is the Debtors' last remaining unsold asset that can
provide value to the estates.  The Debtors received an offer on
July 11, 2020 from CarMax to purchase the Truck for $17,000, and
such Appraisal Offer is valid through and including July 18, 2020.
In the Debtors' business judgment, the Appraisal Offer is fair and
reasonable, and the sale of the Truck is in the best interests of
the Debtors, their estates, and creditors.  Accordingly, they ask
that the Court enters an order authorizing the sale to CarMax on an
emergency basis.  

The Debtors respectfully submit that the proposed sale of Truck
outside the ordinary course of business fits squarely within the
parameters of the sound business judgment test, taking into
consideration that the value of the Truck is de minimis in
comparison to the total value of their assets to be sold during the
Bankruptcy Cases.  

The Debtors ask that the Court's order authorizing the sale of the
Truck be effective immediately by providing that the 14-day stays
under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) are waived, including
with respect to any executory contracts and unexpired leases.
Without a waiver of the stays, the Appraisal Offer from CarMax will
expire on July 18, 2020.  

              About Freedom Oil & Gas, Inc.

Located at 5151 San Felipe, Suite 800, Houston, Texas, Freedom Oil
& Gas, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as an oil and
gas exploration and production company.  Based in Houston, Texas,
the Company has established an acreage position in the oil-rich
portion of the Eagle Ford shale in South Texas, in Dimmitt County.

Freedom Oil & Gas, Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 20-32582), and
its affiliates Freedom Eagle Ford, Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
20-32583), Freedom Production, Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
20-32584), Freedom Oil & Gas USA, Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
20-32585), Maverick Drilling Company, Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 20-32586), and Maverick Production Company, Inc. (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 20-32587), sought Chapter 11 protection on May 11,
2020.  The cases are assigned to Judge David R. Jones.

Freedom Oil & Gas, Freedom Oil & Gas USA, Freedom Eagle Ford, and
Freedom Production each estimated assets in the range of $1 million
to $10 million, and $10 million to $50 million in debt.  Maverick
Drilling's and Maverick Production's each estimated assets and
liabilities in the range of $0 to $50,000.

The Debtors tapped Matthew Okin, Esq., at Okin Adams LLP as their
General Bankruptcy Counsel.

They tapped Johnson Rice & Co. as their Brokerage & Investment
Banking Firm.

The petitions were signed by Russell J. Porter, president, CEO, and
secretary.



GALILEO LEARNING: Committee Hires GlassRatner as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Galileo Learning,
LLC and its affiliates seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California to retain GlassRatner
Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as its financial advisor.

The firm will provide the following services:

     a) analyze the financial operations of Debtor before and after
its Chapter 11 filing;
     
     b) analyze the financial ramifications of any proposed
transactions for which Debtor seeks bankruptcy court approval;

     c) conduct financial analyses;

     d) assist the committee in its review of Debtors' monthly
operating reports;

     e) assist the committee in its evaluation of cash flow and
other projections prepared by Debtor;

     f) conduct forensic investigation into the pre-bankruptcy
activities of Debtor and other parties in order to identify
potential causes of action;

     g) analyze Debtors' transactions with insiders and related or
affiliated companies;

     h) analyze cash management, shared services and other
agreements and arrangements between Debtor and related parties;
and

     i) testify at hearings.

GlassRatner's hourly rates are as follows:

     Seth R. Freeman Senior Managing Director     $525
     George Demos   Senior Managing Director      $425
     Other Senior Managing Directors/Principals   $375-$900
     Other Directors/Associates                   $195-$395

Seth Freeman, senior managing director at GlassRatner, disclosed in
court filings that the firm is a "disinterested person" within the
meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Seth R. Freeman
     GlassRatner Advisory &
     Capital Group, LLC
     3445 Peachtree Road, Suite 1225
     Atlanta, GA 30326
     Phone: 470-346-6800

                       About Galileo Learning

Galileo Learning, LLC operates innovative and educational summer
camps for pre-kindergarteners through 10th graders. In its 18 years
of operation, Galileo Learning has invested more than $10 million
in the development of more than 2,500 hours of unique curriculum
offerings.

Galileo Learning and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Galileo Learning
Franchising LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal.
Lead Case No. 20-40857) on May 6, 2020. The petitions were signed
by Glen Tripp, chief executive officer of Galileo Learning and sole
member of Galileo Learning Franchising.

Galileo Learning estimated assets and liabilities of $10 million to
$50 million while Galileo Learning Franchising estimated assets of
$1 million to $10 million and estimated liabilities of less than
$50,000.

Judge William J. Lafferty oversees the cases.

Debtors hired Hanson Bridgett, LLP as bankruptcy counsel and Tyton
Partners Capital Markets, LLC as investment banker and financial
advisor. Stretto is the claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 17 appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors.  The committee is represented by Levene, Neale, Bender,
Yoo & Brill L.L.P.


GARBANZO MEDITERRANEAN: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Four affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                            Case No.
     ------                                            --------
     Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill, LLC                 20-43963
        Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh Missouri, LLC
        Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh, LLC
        Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill Franchising, LLC
        Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill, LLC
        Garbanzo Investors, LLC
        Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh
        Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh Food Trucks, LLC
        GMG Aquisition LLC
     8143 Maryland Avenue
     Saint Louis, MO 63105    

     Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill Franchising, LLC     20-43964
     7700 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite 270
     Centennial, CO 80112

     Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh, LLC                 20-43965
     7700 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite 270
     Centennial, CO 80112

     Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh Missouri, LLC        20-43966
     7700 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite 270
     Centennial, CO 80112

Business Description:     The Debtors operate a chain of fast food
                          restaurants offering Mediterranean
                          cuisine.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court:                    United States Bankruptcy Court
                          Eastern District of Missouri


Debtors' Counsel:         Robert E. Eggmann, Esq.
                          CARMODY MACDONALD P.C.
                          120 S. Central Ave., Suite 1800
                          Saint Louis, MO 63105
                          Tel: 314-854-8600
                          Email: ree@carmodymacdonald.com

Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill's
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill's
Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill Franchising's
Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Garbanzo Mediterranean Grill Franchising's
Estimated Liabilities: $50,000 to $100,000

Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh's
Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh's
Estimated Liabilities: $0 to $50,000

Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh Missouri's
Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Garbanzo Mediterranean Fresh Missouri's
Estimated Liabilities: $100,000 to $500,000

The petitions were signed by Barry Levine, manager.

Copies of the petitions containing, among other items, lists of the
Debtors' 20 largest unsecured creditors are available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://tinyurl.com/yyhkhrxu
                     https://tinyurl.com/y5w5mzs2
                     https://tinyurl.com/y44eev94
                     https://tinyurl.com/yy5j9k7j


GERALDINE R. ROSINE: Trustee Selling El Sobrante Property for $407K
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kari Bowyer, the Chapter 11 Trustee of the estate of Geraldine Rose
Rosine, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
California to authorize the sale of the real property located at
3543 Miflin Avenue, El Sobrante, California to Dambar B. Thapaliya
for $407,000, subject to overbid.

Among the assets of the Bankruptcy Estate is the Property.  It is
co-owned with The Exemption Trust of the R&G 1993 Family Trust UDT
Dated Feb. 1, 1993, which holds a 30% interest in the Property.
The estate holds a 70% interest in the Property through the
Geraldine R. Rosine 2009 Revocable Living Trust UDT dated Jan. 28,
2009.  There is a judgment lien recorded against the Property by
the Mark Thorson Revocable Trust.  The Exemption Trust and the
Thorson Trust have entered into an agreement with the Trustee that
allows for the sale of the Property free and clear of their
interests.  An order was entered on Jan. 8, 2020 approving the
compromise.

The terms of the sale and the overbid procedure are set forth in
further detail in the Notice And Opportunity For Hearing on Chapter
11 Trustee's Motion For: (1) Authority To Sell Real Property
Located At 3543 Miflin Avenue, El Sobrante, California, Subject To
Overbid, and Free and Clear of Judgment Lien and Co-Owner Interest;
(2) Authority To Pay Real Estate Broker Commission; and (3)
Authority To Pay Associated Costs Of Sale and Taxes.  The Notice
was provided to the Debtor, all the creditors, and the other
parties in interest.

The Property was actively marketed by the broker.  Although there
was a slighter higher offer received at $410,000, due to the
contingencies and other concerns related to the proposed buyer, the
Trustee believes that the offer from the Buyer is the best offer
received.  Based on the Trustee's real estate agent's assessment of
value and the marketing of the Property, the Trustee believes that
the proposed sale is in the best interest of the Bankruptcy Estate.


The Buyer has agreed to purchase the Property for the total sum of
$407,000, subject to Court approval and overbid.  The Trustee
anticipates paying from the proceeds of sale a real estate
commission of 6% of the commission on the Purchase Price to her
real estate broker, Andy Buchanan of Intero Real Estate Services -
Los Altos (to be split with the Buyer's agent).  The Trustee also
proposes to pay associated costs of sale, including but not limited
to, pro-rated real property taxes, city and county transfer taxes,
and a natural hazard zone disclosure report.

The Thorson Trust recorded an abstract of judgment in the amount of
$1,652,582 on Feb. 14, 2018 with the Contra Costa County recorder's
office as document no. 2018-0023584-00.  The current amount of the
Thorson Trust lien is approximately $2,051,605.  As provided in the
agreement, the lien is to reattach to the net proceeds attributable
to the Bankruptcy Estate's interest in the Property until it is
paid and the Trustee is to pay 90% of the net proceeds, i.e.
proceeds remaining after payment of costs of sale, pro rata
property taxes, income tax incurred by the estate in connection
with the sale, broker commission, and other related charges,
attributable to the Bankruptcy Estate's interest in the Property to
the Thorson Trust.  The Trustee asks authority to pay this amount
to the Thorson Trustee as a partial payment of the lien.

The Exemption Trust holds a 30% interest in the Property.  Under
the terms of the compromise noted, the Exemption Trust has agreed
that the Trustee may sell the Property free and clear of their
co-owner interest and that the Trustee will hold the sale proceeds
attributable to this 30% interest until the closing of the case or
further Court order.  The Trustee's accountant in the case
estimates that there may be taxes incurred by the Exemption Trust
in connection with the sale of the Property in an amount up to
$5,000.  

The Trustee asks authority to forward up to this amount to the
Exemption Trust from the proceeds attributable to the Exemption
Trust's interest in the Property, if requested by the Exemption
Trust, so that the Exemption Trust may pay taxes incurred by it in
connection with the sale.

The Trustee's accountant in the case, estimates that there may be
taxes incurred by the Bankruptcy Estate in connection with the sale
of the Property in an amount up to $11,000.  The Trustee asks
authority to pay the amount from the proceeds attributable to the
Bankruptcy Estate's interest in the Property.

There is personal property that will need to be removed prior to
the closing of the sale, and there may be inspection and repair
fees that will need to be paid prior to closing of the sale.  The
Trustee asks authority to pay these costs, estimated to not exceed
$10,000, and, in the event these fees are advanced by the Trustee's
real estate agent, the Trustee requests authority to reimburse the
agent.

The Trustee employed Denzil Clements as special counsel to proceed
with the eviction of the tenants at the Property in order to
maximize the sale price.  An order was entered on Jan. 9, 2020
authorizing the employment of Denzil Clements as special counsel.
As provided in the application for his employment, Mr. Clements is
to be paid a flat fee of $1,440 for the eviction of one tenant ad
$50 for each additional tenant.  There were multiple tenants at the
Property and the Trustee requests authority to pay to Mr. Clements
the total sum of $950 in connection with the eviction of the
tenants at the Property.

The Trustee will request that the Court's order allows the Trustee
to make minor modifications to the purchase agreement including how
title is to be vested to the Buyer as the Buyer may instruct.  The
Trustee will also ask that the Court's order provides that in the
event the Buyer does not close the sale transaction, the Trustee
will be authorized to sell the Property on the same terms and at
the same or greater price to an alternate purchaser without a
further order of the Court, unless the alternate purchaser is an
insider, then the Trustee would only be authorized to sell the
Property to the alternate purchaser after further order of the
Court after providing 24 hours' notice to the Debtor’s counsel
and Office of the U.S. Trustee by an Ex Parte Application.  The
Trustee will also retain the right to negotiate minor changes to
the sale agreement, without further Court order.

Finally, the Trustee asks the Court that the Order approving the
relief sought is effective upon entry, and the stay otherwise
imposed by Rule 62(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
and/or Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) will not apply.
         
Geraldine Rose Rosine sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Cal. Case No. 18-42185) on Sept. 20, 2018.  The Debtor tapped
Craig
V. Winslow, Esq., at Law Office of Craig V. Winslow as counsel.
Kari Bowyer was appointed as Chapter 11 Trustee on Aug. 29, 2019.



GERASIMOS ALIVIZATOS: $245K Sale of Ocean City Property Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas J. Catliota of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland authorized Gerasimos Alivizatos' sale of the
real property located at 109 Caroline St. Unit 211, Ocean City,
Maryland to Jaroslaw and Ilona Struk for $245,000.

The sale is free and clear of any and all liens, claims,
encumbrances and other interests (whether contractual, statutory or
otherwise) of any kind or nature including, without limitation, the
liens of:

     a. Calvin B. Taylor Banking Co. ("CBT"), recorded in the land
records of Worcester County, Maryland at Liber 4684 Folio 307;

     b. The Estate of Russell B. Ruggerio, recorded in the land
records of Worcester County, Maryland at Liber 5185 Folio 733;

     c. Surf Crest Condominium recorded in the land records of
Worcester County, Maryland at Liber 5584 Folio 492;

     d. Surf Crest Condominium Council of Unit Owners recorded in
the Judgment Index of the Circuit Court of Worcester County,
Maryland at case number 23-L-11-000628;

     e. CBT, recorded in the land records of Worcester County,
Maryland at Liber 6115 Folio 249; and,

     f. All the liens of the Maryland State Comptroller recorded in
the Worcester County Circuit Court as tax liens at case numbers
23-C-12-001080, 23-C-14-000116, 23-C-14-000297, 23-C-14-000298,
23-C-14-000300, and 23-C-14-000301.

Upon closing of the sale approved, CBT's lien will attach to the
proceeds of such sale, and after the payment of all agreed closing
costs associated therewith, the entire balance of the net sale
proceeds be disbursed at said closing to CBT in full and final
satisfaction of its liens against, and only with respect to, the
Property.

Nicholas Preziozi, the Realtor approved in the case to sell the
Property, will receive commission in for the sale of the Property,
and the Debtor is authorized to pay the Realtor as part of the
closing costs of this sale at the closing the earned 5% commission
in the amount of $12,250 plus the earned $350 flat fee pursuant to
the Realtor's listing agreement.

The 14-day stay of the Order per Fed. R. Bakr. P. 6004(h) is
waived.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yd3fltmp from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Gerasimos Alivizatos sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Md.
Case No. 20-15354) on May 19, 2020.  The Debtor tapped George
Roles, Esq., as counsel.  Nicholas Preziosi at Pen Fed Reality is
the realtor.


GLENN POOL: S&P Lowers Rating on Senior Secured Notes to 'CCC (sf)'
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its rating on Glenn Pool Oil & Gas Trust
II's (Glenn Trust II's) senior secured notes to 'CCC (sf)' from 'B-
(sf)'. At the same time, S&P removed it from CreditWatch negative,
where it placed in on May 12, 2020.

Glenn Trust II is a volumetric production payment transaction
backed by the overriding royalty interest in the production of gas,
oil, and natural gas liquids from Chesapeake Exploration LLC's
(CELLC's) portfolio of wells located in Oklahoma. Since Glenn Trust
I paid off as scheduled in May 2016, Glenn Trust II has been
entitled to the full production amount, which will continue until
August 2021. The transaction benefits from commodity hedges
provided by Barclays Bank PLC to mitigate price volatility risk.
The transaction has a mortgage that provides a security interest
over the complete working interest that CELLC, the operator and
off-taker, has in the wells.

The rating action on Glenn Trust II's senior secured notes reflects
S&P's view of:

-- Hydrocarbon coverage ratios below 1.0x; and

-- The increased risk that CELLC could curtail production, or
default on its production or purchase obligations as a result of
Chesapeake Energy Corp.'s chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on June 28,
2020.

"In our view, these factors increase the risk that the notes may
not be paid down in full by their August 2021 legal final maturity,
and this risk is commensurate with a 'CCC (sf)' rating. As defined
in our criteria, the 'CCC (sf)' level rating reflects our view that
the related class is vulnerable to nonpayment and dependent upon
favorable business, financial, and economic conditions in order to
be paid interest and/or principal according to the terms of the
transaction," S&P said.

The transaction's production coverage ratios remains weak. The
coverage ratio is a measurement of excess production or cushion to
the transaction (actual production divided by scheduled delivery in
each month). The most recently reported production levels,
reflecting May 2020 production, indicate a gas coverage ratio of
approximately 0.89x and an oil coverage ratio of approximately
0.85. The long-term average coverage trend has remained weak,
exacerbated by the stressed energy market that further constrains
the economics surrounding future oil and gas production that the
transaction depends on for debt service.

"We believe the June 28, 2020, chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of
Chesapeake Energy Corp. increases the risk that CELLC could curtail
production, such as by shutting certain wells, or default on its
production and purchase obligations. Diminished production
increases the risk that the notes will not receive timely interest
or ultimate principal payment. The transaction does not have any
liquidity reserve to cover interest shortfalls and has only until
the August 2021 legal final maturity of the notes to catch up on
any scheduled principal shortfalls," S&P said.

"We will continue to review whether the rating currently assigned
to the transaction remains consistent with the credit enhancement
available to support the rating, and we will take further rating
actions as we deem necessary," the rating agency said.


GLOBAL ASSET: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 on Aug. 12, 2020, appointed a
committee to represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case
of Global Asset Rental, LLC.

The committee members are:

     1. Schaefer Container
        c/o Richard Winslow
        5275 Westgate Drive
        Suite D
        Atlanta, GA 30336
        Phone: 404-349-4524
        Email: RWinslow@SchaeferContainers.com

     2. HID Global Switzerland SA
        c/o Christopher R. Kirby
        Route de Pra-Charbon 27
        1614 Granges (Veveyse)
        Switzerland
        Phone: +41 21 908 01 00
               512-776-9009
        Email: Christopher.kirby@hidglobal.com

     3. MM Steel SRL
        c/o Fabio Metrangolo
        Via Alessandro Volta 2
        Minervino Murge
        Bari, Italy 76013
        Phone: + 39 329 860 5460
        Email: alba.metrangolo@gmail.com
               Fabio.metrangolo@mmsteel.it  

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                     About Global Asset Rental

Global Asset Rental, LLC is an asset rental and logistics solutions
company engaged in the business of renting plastic pallets and
kegs.  It is based in Orlando, Fla.  Visit http://www.globalkeg.com
for more information.

Global Asset Rental, formerly known as Global Keg Rental, LLC,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
6:20-bk-04126) on July 23, 2020.  Soneet R. Kapila, chief
restructuring officer, signed the petition.  In its petition,
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities.

Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., serves as bankruptcy counsel.
Soneet R. Kapila of KapilaMukamal, LLP is the chief
restructuring officer.


GOODNO'S JEWELRY: 36 North Wants Plan to Include Lease Payments
---------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor 36 North, LLC objects to the Plan of liquidation and
disclosure statement of Debtor Goodno’s Jewelry Inc.

At the time of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtor leased from the
Creditor retail premises in a shopping center located at 2821 36th
Ave NW #100, Norman, OK 73072.

Pursuant to 11 USC 365(d)(4)(A), the Debtor had 120 days to accept
or reject the lease.  The Debtor never accepted or rejected the
lease within that time and therefore, was deemed rejected.

36 North avers that the Debtor had an obligation to pay the lease
payments to protect and preserve the estate.  But it notes that the
Plan presented by the Debtor does not provide for the payment of
the Creditor's administrative claim.  Moreover, it adds that the
Plan does not provide sufficient information as to the assets
available to satisfy the Credior's non-priority claim.

A full-text copy of the Creditor's objection to plan and disclosure
statement dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/ycvzdje5 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

Attorney for 36 North:

         Eugene K. Bertman
         Tally, Turner & Bertman, P.C.
         219 E. Main St.
         Norman, OK 73069
         Telephone: 405-364-8300
         Facsimile: 405-364-7059
         E-mail: gbertman@ttb.law

                     About Goodno's Jewelry

Goodno's Jewelry, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Okla. Case No. 19-14103) on Oct. 5,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of between
$50,001 and $100,000.


GREATER APOSTOLIC: Examiner's $3.5M Sale of San Diego Props. Okayed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Margaret M. Mann of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of California authorized Christopher R. Barclay,
the chapter 11 examiner with expanded powers for the bankruptcy
estate of Greater Apostolic Faith Temple Church, Inc., to sell the
estate's right, title, and interest in the three parcels of real
property commonly known as (a) 138 28th Street, San Diego,
California, APN 535-542-14-00 ("Church Property"); (b) 2754
Imperial Avenue, San Diego, California, APN 535-542-05-00; and (c)
2810 L Street, San Diego, California 92102, APN 545-271-15-00, to
7227 Saranac, LLC and/or its nominee $3,530,260, pursuant to the
terms of their Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 17, 2020, as
amended.

The sale is free and clear of the following liens, claims, and
encumbrances:   

     a. The deed of trust to secure indebtedness dated Dec. 20,
2006, granted by the Debtor in favor of trustee, PRLAP, Inc., for
the benefit of Bank of America N.A., and recorded in the Official
Records of the County of San Diego on Dec. 29, 2006, as Document
No. 2006-0924653, the beneficial interest in which is currently
held by 138 28th San Diego, LLC pursuant to an Assignment recorded
in the Official Records of the County of San Diego County on Dec.
2, 2014, as Document No. 2014-0524012 ("138 28th San Diego, LLC
Lien").

     b. The deed of trust dated Dec. 10, 2018, granted by the
Debtor in favor of trustee, Chicago Title Co., for the benefit of
Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP, and recorded in the
Official Records of the County of San Diego on Dec. 17, 2018, as
Document No. 2018-0514800 ("Procopio Lien").   

     c. The tax lien in the amount of $11,772 in favor of the
United States of America recorded in the Official Records of the
County of San Diego on May 1, 2019, as Document No. 2019-0161701
("First Tax Lien").   

     d. The tax lien in the amount of $5,940 in favor of the United
States of America recorded in the Official Records of the County of
San Diego on May 24, 2019, as Document No. 2019-0198583 ("Second
Tax Lien").

     e. Any rights or claims arising out of or related to the
Notice of Pending Action (Lis Pendens) recorded by Capexco US GP,
Inc. in the Official Records of the County of San Diego on Feb. 14,
2019, as Document No. 2019-0053386 ("Capexco Lis Pendens"), or the
underlying civil action, S.D.S.C. Case No.
37-2019-00008246-CU-BC-CTL.   

The Examiner is authorized to pay the following amounts directly
out of escrow:   

     a. The Total Allowed Secured Claim due to 138 28th San Diego,
LLC under the Stipulation for Allowance of Claim, approved by the
Court's Order dated July 21, 2020.

     b. The $20,000 break-up fee due to the Back-up Bidder upon the
closing of the sale to the Winning Bidder.   

     c. The real estate broker's commissions due on the sale of the
Properties and previously approved by the Court's Order dated May
22, 2020.

     d. The current real property taxes and other customary escrow
fees and costs of sale.   

The remaining net proceeds from the sale of the Properties will be
retained by the Examiner for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate
pending further order of the Court.   The 138 28th San Diego, LLC
Lien (to the extent not paid in full through escrow), the Procopio
Lien, the First Tax Lien, the Second Tax Lien, and any rights or
claims arising out of or related to the Capexco Lis Pendens will
attach to the net sale proceeds to the same extent, validity, and
priority that existed on the Properties immediately prior to the
sale.   The Examiner is authorized to open an account in the
bankruptcy estate's name for purposes of holding the net sale
proceeds.   

Notwithstanding Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h), the
Order will take effect immediately upon entry.   

In the event the sale of the Property to the Winning Bidder fails
to close for any reason, the Examiner is authorized to sell the
Properties to the Back-up Bidder for the amount of its last bid
($3,520,260).  

The Debtor will vacate and deliver physical possession of the
Church Property to the Winning Bidder (or the Back-up Bidder) no
later than 45 days after the sale to the Winning Bidder (or Back-up
Bidder) closes.

A hearing on the Motion was held on July 22, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

                   About Greater Apostolic Faith
                        Temple Church Inc.

Greater Apostolic Faith Temple Church Inc., a religious
organization in San Diego, Calif., sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 19-02820) on
May 14, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of
between $1 million and $10 million.  The Speckman Law Firm is the
Debtor's counsel.

On July 17, 2019, the Court appointed Mike Habib of Coldwell
Commercial as listing agent.



GUGERLI HOLDINGS: Has Until Oct. 7 to File Plan & Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse has entered an order directing
debtor Gugerli Holdings, LLC, to file a plan and disclosure
statement on or before Oct. 7, 2020.

July 30, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 208, 300 Fayetteville Street,
Raleigh, NC 27601 is the status conference.

A full-text copy of the order dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yawmmqbl from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                      About Gugerli Holdings

Gugerli Holdings, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 20-02492) on July 9,
2020, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Debtor has tapped Sasser Law Firm as its legal counsel.



HALLOWELL HOUSE: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor: Hallowell House, LLC
                101 Second Street
                Hallowell, ME 04347

Involuntary Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Maine

Case Number: 20-10375

Judge: Hon. Michael A. Fagone

Name of Petitioner: Dirigo Capital Advisors, LLC
                    2 Main Street
                    Topsham, ME 04086

Nature of Petitioner's
Claim & Claim Amount: Money Loaned, $103,527

Petitioner's Counsel: George J. Marcus, Esq.
                      MARCUS CLEGG
                      16 Middle Street, Unit 501
                      Portland, ME 04101
                      Tel: 207-828-8000

A full-text copy of the Involuntary Petition is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

                   https://tinyurl.com/y597bgdj


HAMILTON PROJECTS: S&P Rates $900MM Sr. Secured Term Loan B 'BB-'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' final rating to Hamilton
Projects Acquiror LLC's $900 million senior secured term loan B,
based on its review of the financing documents, which conform to
its requirements.

Hamilton is a two-asset combined-cycle gas turbine power portfolio
with a total of 1,671 megawatts (MW) nameplate capacity based in
northeastern Pennsylvania. The Liberty power project in Bradford
County has a rated capacity of 763 MW (summer) and 829 MW (winter).
Similarly, the Patriot power project in Lycoming County has a rated
capacity of 763 MW (summer) and 842 MW (winter). Liberty and
Patriot, which entered commercial operations in mid-2016, sell the
power produced into Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland
Interconnection's (PJM) Penelec zone and Pennsylvania Power and
Light (PPL) zone, respectively.

The Mid-Atlantic Area Council (MAAC) region still has a sizeable
share of coal capacity, so S&P thinks combined-cycle gas-fired
units should remain profitable, whereas coal-based generation units
will continue to struggle economically.   S&P forecasts Liberty and
Patriot of the Hamilton portfolio and some merchant generators,
especially those in unconstrained regions in PJM, to realize low
average spark spreads below $10/MWh in 2020. However, S&P projects
an average spark spread in the low-teen area over Hamilton's 7-year
debt tenor. Winter and summer are peak seasons for energy use that
provide generators the opportunities to generate higher cash flows.
Nevertheless, the mild 2019-2020 winter has put downward pressure
on power prices and the weakness in pricing has been exacerbated by
low-cost natural gas in TETCO M3, Transco Leidy, TGP Z4 300 Leg,
etc. S&P observed daily on-peak prices in several major PJM power
hubs hovering in the high teens and low-$20s per MWh areas for over
the past few months. This also means that daily off-peak prices
were much lower that resulted in fewer full load dispatch
opportunities during off-peak periods. S&P does not expect power
prices to improve in the second half of 2020 because lower natural
gas prices continue to weigh significantly on power prices. This
does not mean that merchant gas-fired generators will underperform
because many could offset the low spark spreads through higher
generation, which S&P saw in some rated peers in PJM. Conceptually,
mid-merit units (i.e., units that fall between baseload and peak
load) like many efficient combined-cycle power plants dispatch at
peak periods and dispatch down during off-peak due to lower power
prices overnight. Depending on the economics, many operators often
times run these mid-merit units at baseload around the clock with a
marginal decrease on dispatch overnight, thus resulting in higher
capacity factors and generation. Also nowadays, the only time when
most coal-based generators could be competitive is when natural gas
prices surge in colder winter days like what happened in January
2018. With the recent mild winter, diminished power demand, and
perhaps a normal-to-mild summer, more higher variable cost
coal-based generators are at risk and S&P believes significant
retirements will commence again based on economic considerations
and other environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation of Hamilton producing
a debt service coverage ratio of at least 1.4x in all years during
the debt tenor. S&P expects Liberty and Patriot, under new
ownership, to maintain high availability and dispatch at capacity
factors of 70%-80%. Under the current market condition in PJM, S&P
projects realized spark spreads below $10 per MWh over the next 12
months with some recovery over time to the low-teens area.

"We could downgrade the debt if Hamilton is unable to maintain DSCR
of 1.35x on a sustained basis. This could stem from weak realized
spark spreads due to unfavorable PJM power prices in a low-cost
natural gas environment; unplanned outages that require a full
plant shutdown for extensive period; or economic factors in which
the power plants are regularly kept at minimum load. We could
consider a downgrade if Hamilton fails to pay down the term loan B
significantly through the excess cash flow sweep," S&P said.

"We could consider raising our debt rating if we believed Hamilton
could achieve DSCRs of 1.8x on a sustained basis, including the
refinancing period in our base case. This could stem from secular
developments in the PJM wholesale market that positively influence
the power and capacity prices for an extensive period, steady
operational performance, and the continued access to relatively
inexpensive natural gas feedstock," the rating agency said.


HARVEST PLASMA: $2M Sale of Mount Pleasant Property Approved
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jefferey A. Deller of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania authorized Harvest Plasma Torch
Corp.'s sale of the real property located at 221 Westec Drive,
Mount Pleasant, Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania to Maris Worthing
Trust, Francis X. Delallo, Trustee, for $2.025 million.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.

The Purchase Sale Agreement is approved in its entirety, and the
Debtor and the Real Property Successful Bidder are authorized to
fully perform thereunder.

The Real Property is being sold "as is-where is, with all faults"
without any representations or warranties from the Debtor as to the
quality or fitness of such assets for either their intended use or
any other purpose.

With five days following the consummation of the sale, the Debtor
will file a report of the sale.

Formal closing on the sale will occur within 30 days after entry of
the Sale Confirmation Order confirming the auction.

The net proceeds of the Real Property Successful Bid will be
disbursed directly to the Debtor's Attorney, after deducing and
paying at Closing the following expenses: (i) Municipal Authority
of Westmoreland County for delinquent sewer and water; (ii)
Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County for current sewer and
water; (iii) delinquent real estate taxes, if any; (iv) current
real estate taxes, pro-rated to the date of closing; and (v) the
Court-approved broker commission.

The automatic stay provisions of section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code
are vacated and modified to the extent necessary to implement the
provisions of the Order and the terms and conditions of the
Purchase Sale Agreement.

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h) and
6006(d), the Order will not be stayed after its entry, but will be
effective and enforceable immediately upon entry, and the stay
provided in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) are expressly
waived and will not apply.  Accordingly, the Debtor is authorized
and empowered to close the sale contemplated by the Order
immediately upon entry of the Order.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yy5rjekq from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                 About Harvest Plasma Torch Corp.

Harvest Plasma Torch is an industrial torch company that
manufactures high temperature torches to convert solid waste into
synthetic gas, which can be used to generate electricity.

On May 10, 2019, creditors Ronald Klatt, William Grichin and
Denton
Hough filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition against the company
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-21929).    

The case is assigned to Judge Jeffery A. Deller.
Bernstein-Burkley,
P.C., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.



HARVEST PLASMA: Creditors to Get Paid from Asset Sale Proceeds
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Harvest Plasma Torch Corporation and the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania a Joint Plan of Reorganization
and a Disclosure Statement on July 10, 2020.

The Plan provides for the creation of a liquidating trust and sale
of the Debtor's real property and, if necessary, its remaining
assets, the proceeds of which are anticipated to repay allowed
claims in full.

The Debtor's real property consists of the real estate located at
221 Westec Drive, Mount Pleasant, Westmoreland County,
Pennsylvania, the improvements thereon, including an industrial
building that is over 66,000 square feet, and certain personal
property and fixtures located on the property.  The Debtor's
remaining assets consist of, among other things, the Debtor's
intellectual property.

In order to prevent the consummation of the sale of the Real
Property and the Remaining Assets, the Equity Interests shall have
the right to and must (a) contribute $3,500,000 to the Debtor no
later than Aug. 1, 2020, which will be used to repay allowed claims
in full, and (b) in the event the notice of the successful bidder
for the purchase of the Real Property is submitted in accordance
with the Bid Procedures Order, contribute an additional $50,000 to
the Debtor no later than Aug. 1, 2020, which will be used to pay
said bidder as compensation for the cancelled sale and its expenses
in connection with the sale.

All resulting funds from the sale of the Debtor's assets and all
other available proceeds will be distributed by the Liquidating
Trustee to certain holders of allowed claims as against the Debtor,
whose allowed claims against the Debtor will be exchanged for a pro
rata beneficial interest in the Liquidating Trust.

Holders of Class 3 general unsecured claims are estimated to
recover 100 percent of their allowed claims.  They will receive a
distribution from the Liquidating Trust of their pro rata share of
the proceeds available as soon as practicable after the sale of the
assets and after payment of all higher priority Claims.

Holders of equity interests in Class 4 will not receive any
Distribution under this Plan until the Holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims have been paid in full.

The Plan provides for the liquidation of the Real Property and
Remaining Assets and the distribution of the net proceeds.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated July 10, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y7mga4ot from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

          Kirk B. Burkley, Esq.
          Keila Estevez, Esq.
          BERNSTEIN-BURKLEY, P.C.
          707 Grant Street, Suite 2200, Gulf Tower
          Pittsburgh, PA 15219
          Telephone: (412) 456-8100
          Facsimile: (412) 456-8135

                 - and -

          David W. Parham, Esq.
          Amy M. Leitch, Esq.
          AKERMAN LLP
          2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: (214) 720-4300
          Facsimile: (214) 981-9339

Attorneys for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

          William C. Price, Esq.
          CLARK HILL PLC
          301 Grant Street, 14th Floor
          Pittsburgh, PA 15219
          Telephone: (412) 394-7776
          Facsimile: (412) 394-2555

                 About Harvest Plasma Torch Corp.

Harvest Plasma Torch is an industrial torch company that
manufactures high temperature torches to convert solid waste into
synthetic gas, which can be used to generate electricity.

On May 10, 2019, creditors Ronald Klatt, William Grichin and Denton
Hough filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition against the company
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-21929).  The case is assigned to Judge
Jeffery A. Deller. Bernstein-Burkley, P.C., is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


HERSCHEND ENTERTAINMENT: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR; Outlook Negative
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to themed
entertainment owner and operator Herschend Entertainment Co. LLC
(along with co-borrowers Herschend Adventure Holdings LLC and
Harlem Globetrotters International Inc.). The outlook is negative.

S&P assigned its 'B' issue level rating and '3'. recovery rating to
the proposed senior secured term loan.

"Although the COVID-19 pandemic and U.S. recession will sharply
reduce Herschend's 2020 revenue and EBITDA, we expect park
attendance to begin recovering in the second half of 2020 and in
2021, and leverage to improve to below 6x in 2021," S&P said.

Herschend closed all of its assets in late March in response to the
COVID-19 pandemic, which caused it to generate near zero revenue
and burn cash until it began to reopen some assets in late May.
S&P's expectation is that EBITDA will be very low and leverage will
be very high in 2020, before a recovery in attendance in 2021
improves revenue and EBITDA and drives leverage below 6x. The
company will add significant cash to the balance sheet, and should
have around $150 million in liquidity following the proposed term
loan B issuance. This liquidity should provide a buffer under S&P's
current base case and if attendance is distressed in the company's
theme parks and other assets more than S&P currently anticipates.

"As a result of COVID-19 closures, and suppressed demand upon
reopening, we believe Herschend's revenues will decline around
60%-65% in 2020. We assume revenue in 2021 remains around 20%-30%
below 2019 levels, as a result of the steep recession, consumer
apprehensions until there is a medical solution to the virus, and
capacity and other restrictions in most of the company's business
lines, and our assumption the Harlem Globetrotters will be unable
to tour until there is a successful medical solution to COVID-19,"
S&P said.

"We expect EBITDA to be very low in 2020, recovering significantly
in 2021 but remaining about 40% below 2019," the rating agency
said.

The company's revenue and EBITDA are concentrated at its three
theme parks, particularly at Dollywood, its normalized cash flow
base is smaller than rated peers, and the company faces some
seasonality and weather-related risks.  While Herschend has
diversified through its acquisitions of the Harlem Globetrotters
(2013) and Pink Adventure Tours (2018), the company generated about
58% of its 2019 EBITDA from its three theme parks. Compared with
rated regional theme park peers, Herschend generates less revenue
and EBITDA, owns fewer parks, and has less geographic diversity.
However, many of Herschend's assets are located in Tennessee,
Missouri, and Georgia, states that have experienced a rapid rise in
cases in July 2020 but also may allow the company to keep its
assets open. This may help Herschend recover attendance and revenue
at a moderately faster pace than some other theme park operators,
as long as consumers are willing to visit the parks. S&P's rating
also incorporates the company's exposure to seasonality and
weather-related risks faced by amusement parks compared with some
other leisure operators.

Partially offsetting these risk factors are the company's portfolio
of drive-to assets, which may recover faster than
destination-oriented properties during economic downturns and
periods of reduced consumer spending, and the positioning and high
quality of its assets, particular its Dollywood and Silver Dollar
City parks. Dollywood and Silver Dollar City benefit from strong
brand equity in their local markets, industry awards and
recognition, and premium attractions that differentiate their parks
within the regions that they operate. Herschend is exposed to
limited competition from other theme park operators of similar
asset quality in its markets. Dollywood and Silver Dollar City's
nearest theme park competitors, which include Carowinds, Holiday
World and Six Flags Over Georgia for Dollywood and Worlds Of Fun
and Six Flags St Louis for Silver Dollar City, are over 150 miles
away, limiting the competition for local consumers. Because of the
considerable barriers to entry to theme park development, including
high capital costs and stringent regulations, it is unlikely that a
competitor park will be developed in the markets in which Herschend
operates.

Herschend's liquidity and potential recovery in cash flows
partially offset its high lease adjusted leverage.   

"Pro forma for the issuance of the term loan B, we expect the
company will have about $150 million of unrestricted cash. While
the company burned cash when all of its assets were closed from
late March through late May, it is our understanding that the
portfolio is currently generating modest positive cash flow when
adjusted for one time expenses," S&P said.

"Additionally, the company generated substantial cash flow from
operations prior the pandemic, and if attendance can recover under
our base case assumptions, the company could generate cash flow
from operations to debt that are good for the current rating," S&P
said.

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) credit factors for this
credit rating change:

-- Health and safety

The negative outlook reflects the possibility S&P could lower the
rating if Herschend's recovery is slower than expected, causing the
company's revenue, EBITDA, and cash flow to underperform the rating
agency's base case in a manner that causes leverage to be sustained
above 6x.

"We could lower ratings if lease adjusted debt to EBITDA is
sustained above 6x in 2021 due to a potential slower recovery in
attendance," S&P said.

"It is unlikely that we will revise our outlook on Herschend to
stable for the duration of the pandemic. Although unlikely within
the next 12 months, we could raise ratings on the company if we
believe it will sustain leverage below 5x," the rating agency said.


HORIZON GLOBAL: S&P Withdraws 'CCC' Issuer Credit Rating
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings on Horizon Global
Corp. due to a lack of sufficient information to maintain them. At
the time of the withdrawal, S&P rated the company 'CCC' with a
negative outlook.



HUDSON RIVER TRADING: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR; Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB-' issuer credit and senior
secured debt ratings on Hudson River Trading LLC. S&P also assigned
its 'BB-' rating to the firm's senior secured term loan B add-on.
The outlook on the issuer credit rating remains stable.

"Our ratings on HRT reflect its adequate capitalization and highly
profitable high-frequency trading franchise. We believe the firm's
operational risk, reliance on short-term prime broker funding, and
transactional principal trading revenue--which can vary quarter by
quarter--partially offset these strengths," S&P said.

Founded in 2002, HRT is a holding company for regulated and
nonregulated subsidiaries in the U.S., Europe, and Asia-Pacific.
Its business consists of both principal trading and market-making
of electronically traded financial products, including U.S. and
international equities, fixed income, currencies, futures, options,
and commodities, with some concentration in cash equities,
particularly U.S. cash equities. HRT is one of the larger
independent high-frequency trading firms, which gives it the scale
to invest in the technology necessary to stay competitive. While it
is less likely over the near term, S&P believes the firm's large
U.S. cash equities trading could be exposed to regulatory risk or
changes in market structure.

HRT uses technology to rapidly trade a very large volume of
financial instruments relative to its capital, with millions of
transactions per day. Like all high-frequency trading firms, HRT
has elevated operational risk, in S&P's view, because of its
reliance on complex algorithms and automated risk-management
functions. The firm has many safeguards in place, including
built-in limits on the amount of capital devoted to any trading
strategy and automatic halts to trading in strategies for a variety
of reasons.

HRT's trading and operational track record suggests that its
risk-management practices have worked well. Further, its tangible
equity provides capacity to help absorb trading losses if its
trading system risk controls fail.

"We view capitalization as adequate given our expectation that the
firm's risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio will remain above 10%. The
size of the period-end balance sheet has grown considerably with
the growth of the firm's trading operations, including more
positions held overnight. However, retention of strong earnings,
particularly in the first half of 2020, has built up equity such
that we expect as the firm deploys the additional trading capital
to expand its trading operations, the RAC ratio will remain above
10%," S&P said.

The growth in the firm's balance sheet has increased HRT's use of
short-term financing, principally from prime brokers. That said,
S&P views HRT's funding and liquidity as adequate for the rating
given its maintenance of significant excess trading capital. The
new debt proceeds and the recent addition of a committed term
liquidity facility provide additional liquidity and augment HRT's
uncommitted settlement line.

"Our issuer credit and debt ratings on HRT are two notches lower
than the group credit profile to reflect that the debt-issuing
nonoperating holding company is structurally subordinated to its
operating subsidiaries and open to potential regulatory
interference in dividends to the parent," S&P said.

S&P rates the firm's senior secured term loan B at the same level
as the issuer credit rating given the lack of higher-priority debt
obligations at the holding company.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that HRT will maintain
supportive operational performance, capitalization, and liquidity
as it continues to expand its trading operations and risk.
Specifically, we expect the firm will maintain profitability, a RAC
ratio above 10%, and adequate funding and liquidity," S&P said.

Over the next 12 months, S&P could lower the ratings if:

-- The firm grows market risk more rapidly than expected;

-- It suffers a material operating loss;

-- The RAC ratio declines below 10% on a sustained basis; or

-- Available liquid capital declines materially.

While it is unlikely over the outlook horizon, S&P could raise its
ratings on HRT if it increases its RAC ratio above 15% on a
sustainable basis.


HVI CAT CANYON: Trustee Seeks Approval to Hire Tax Consultant
-------------------------------------------------------------
Michael McConnell, the Chapter 11 trustee for HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.,
seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California to employ Assessment Technologies as his
real property tax consultant.  

The firm will provide the following tax compliance services:

  -- serve as agent of record for all issues with the tax office
related to tax assessment on Debtors' properties;

  -- prepare annual returns:

  -- prepare Oil & Dissolved Gas Production Report forms for the
properties owned by Debtor's bankruptcy estate;

  -- respond to requests for information including Change in
Ownership Statements and other related requests; and

  -- review calculations and assumptions produced by the
appropriate appraisal or assessing authority.

Assessment Technologies will be paid at hourly rates for its tax
compliance services as follows:

     Partners                 $550 per hour
     Senior Consultants       $425 per hour
     Consultants              $350 per hour
     Professional Staff       $250 per hour
     Administrative Staff     $150 per hour
     Research Staff           $100 per hour

For the filing of the 2020 tax returns in Santa Barbara, Kern and
Orange Counties, the firm has agreed to charge a flat aggregate fee
of $5,500.
services.

Assessment Technologies will also provide the following tax
consulting services:

  -- analyze the economic feasibility of attaining reduced property
tax assessments or taxes;

  -- prepare all necessary administrative appeals; and

  -- represent the trustee before concerned authorities (at the
firm's sole discretion) to negotiate the lowest possible property
value or assessment.

For tax consulting services, Assessment Technologies will receive a
fee of 40 percent of the "net tax savings" achieved, payable at the
time that the assets are sold.  

In the event that the trustee's legal counsel successfully
negotiates a real property tax savings with Santa Barbara, Kern or
Orange Counties as part of the sale of Debtor's property, the firm
will only be paid a reduced fee of 20 percent of the net tax
savings.

Net tax saving is determined by deducting from tax savings all
expenses incurred by Assessment Technologies.

Assessment Technologies and all of its partners and associates are
disinterested persons within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     John Lammert
     Assessment Technologies
     40 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 607
     San Antonio, TX 78216
     Tel: 210-270-9592
     Email: jlammert@attaxadvisory.com

                        About HVI Cat Canyon

HVI Cat Canyon, Inc., a privately held oil and gas extraction
company in New York, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-12417) on July 25,
2019.  At the time of the filing, Debtor was estimated to have
assets of between $100 million and $500 million and liabilities of
the same range.

On Aug. 28, 2019, the case was transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas.  On Sept. 12, 2019, the
case was transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California and was assigned a new case number (Case No.
19-11573).

Debtor has tapped Weltman & Moskowitz, LLP as its bankruptcy
counsel, Cappello Global, LLC and Camden Financial Services as
financial advisors, and Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims
and noticing agent.

On Aug. 9, 2019, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors in Debtor's case.  The committee
has tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP and Cole Schotz P.C.
as its legal counsel, and Conway MacKenzie, Inc. as its financial
advisor.

Michael A. McConnell was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee for
Debtor's bankruptcy estate.  He is represented by Danning, Gill,
Israel & Krasnoff, LLP.  CR3 Partners, LLP and Assessment
Technologies serve as the trustee's financial advisor and real
property tax consultant, respectively.


IMPACT GLASS: Unsecured Creditors to Receive $132K Over 5 Years
---------------------------------------------------------------
Impact Glass Services, LLC, filed the First Amended Disclosure
Statement describing Plan of Reorganization dated July 10, 2020.

Class 10 General Unsecured Claims will be paid $132,081.  This
amount shall be paid with equal monthly payments for 60 months of
$2,201.35 beginning within 30 days following entry of the
confirmation order, on a pro rata basis.  General unsecured
creditors who file a valid proof of claim will receive payment on a
pro-rata basis.

Members in Class 11 will retain their equity in the Debtor based on
the payment of new value by funding this plan when necessary,
relinquishing of their unsecured claims which total $243,809 and
their further operation of the Debtor at salaries below market
rate.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
Debtor's revenue stream and when and if necessary, the Debtor's
managing members.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
July 10, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yacznpf9 from
PacerMonitor at no charge.

                 About Impact Glass Services

Impact Glass Services, LLC -- https://www.impactglassmiami.com/ --
specializes in commercial and residential glass services.  It has
been serving the glass needs for homeowners, condo associations,
property managers, business owners and high-end construction
companies of South Florida since 2009.

Impact Glass Services sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-22046) on Sept. 9,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of between $500,000 and $1 million and liabilities of
between $1 million and $10 million.  Judge John K. Olson oversees
the case.  The Debtor is represented by the Law Offices of Richard
R. Robles, P.A.


INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTION: Aug. 25 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On July 6, 2020, Robert Chernicoff filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania a disclosure
statement and plan for Debtor Infrastructure Solution Services,
Inc.

On July 10, 2020, Judge Henry W. Van Eck ordered that:

   * Aug. 25, 2020 at 09:30 AM at Ronald Reagan Federal Building,
Bankruptcy Courtroom (3rd Floor), Third & Walnut Streets,
Harrisburg, PA 17101 is the hearing to consider approval of the
disclosure statement.

  * Aug. 14, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
in accordance with Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 3017(a)
written objections to the disclosure statement.

  * Within seven days after entry of this order, the disclosure
statement and plan will be distributed in accordance with Federal
Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3017(a).

A copy of the order dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yby38t2q from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Robert E Chernicoff
       Cunningham and Chernicoff PC
       2320 North Second Street
       Harrisburg, PA 17110

              About Infrastructure Solution Services

Infrastructure Solution Services Inc. is a provider of green
stormwater infrastructure solutions in the Philadelphia market.

Based in Jonestown, Pa., Infrastructure Solution Services filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 19-03915) on Sept.
13, 2019.  In the petition signed by Corey Wolff, director, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Subsidiary Happy Endings Holdings, LLC, also filed for Chapter 11
(Bankr. M.D. Pa. 19-03916) on Sept. 13, listing under $1 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

Another subsidiary, ISS Management, LLC, a privately held company
whose principal assets are located at 156 S Bethlehem Pike Ambler,
PA 19002, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D.
Pa. Case No. 19-04825) on Nov. 12.  In its petition, ISS estimated
$1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.

All three cases are jointly administered under Infrastructure
Solution Services'.  The Hon. Henry W. Van Eck oversees the cases.
The petitions were signed by Corey Wolff, director of
Infrastructure Solution Services.

Robert E. Chernicoff, Esq., at Cunningham Chernicoff & Warshawsky,
P.C., serves as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


IRON MOUNTAIN: S&P Rates New $850MM Senior Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to Iron Mountain Inc.'s (IRM) proposed $850 million
senior unsecured notes due in 2031. The '3' recovery rating
reflects S&P's expectations of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded
estimate: 50%) recovery in the rating agency's simulated default
scenario.

The company intends to use the proceeds to redeem its 5.375% senior
Canadian dollar notes due in 2023, 3% senior euro notes due in
2025, 5.375% senior notes due in 2025, and $500 million senior
unsecured notes due in 2021, and repay a portion of outstanding
revolving credit facility borrowings. The refinancing removes the
last series of notes with more restrictive 6.5x leverage incurrence
of indebtedness covenant.

IRM's operating performance in the second quarter of 2020 was much
better than expected, with reported revenue declining 7.9% compared
to S&P's expectation for a 15% decline. The company demonstrated
good ongoing growth in its leasable and leased megawatts within its
data center business and 2.3% constant-currency organic storage
rental revenue growth. However, COVID-19 related business closures
had a meaningful impact on IRM's services revenue (23.1%
constant-currency decline in the second quarter) and its records
management storage volumes. Although services activity appears to
have troughed in May, S&P remains concerned the accelerated pace of
digital transformation initiatives at IRM's clients or the lower
use of paper records could slow organic records management storage
growth.

The negative outlook reflects uncertainty regarding IRM's operating
performance amid expected earnings volatility because of the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the company's restructuring program,
as well as its financial policy track record of favoring
debt-financed investments and dividend payments over leverage
reduction.

"We could lower our rating on IRM if credit measures remain
pressured and we become increasingly confident adjusted leverage
will remain above 6x in the next 12-18 months or should we forecast
a financial maintenance covenant violation. To revise our outlook
to stable, we would need to see strong operating performance and a
demonstrated commitment to sustain leverage below 6x while IRM
realizes benefits from its extensive restructuring program," S&P
said.


J.C. PENNEY: Closes Kings Plaza & Manhattan Mall Locations
----------------------------------------------------------
NBC New York News reports that earlier in the summer, retailer J.C.
Penney  announced it would be closing 154 stores this summer after
it filed for bankruptcy in May 2020.

A Manhattan shopping center that was forced to close down amid the
COVID-19 pandemic will eventually reopen, but one store located
inside will noticeably not be reopening its doors.

The J.C. Penney located in the Manhattan Mall near Herald Square
has closed for good, the company said on Tuesday. The store was
located just a few blocks from the famous Macy's flagship on West
34th Street, in an area littered with other stores and shopping
destinations.

J.C. Penney moved into the mall, formerly used as the Gimbels
flagship, just over a decade ago in 2009. Its departure leaves the
mall with no large department store retailer, instead housing a
variety of smaller clothing stores and other shops.

Along with the Manhattan store, the J.C. Penney location at Kings
Plaza in Brooklyn will also be closing down for good. That
location, near Marine Park, is currently open but will permanently
close come September 27, and will likely begin its liquidation sale
the week of July 12, 2020.

Earlier in the summer, the retail chain announced it would be
closing 154 stores this summer, with closing sales having started
June 12. Other locations in New York (Bay Shore, Poughkeepsie,
Valley Stream) were already slated for closure.

There are still three other J.C. Penney locations throughout the
five boroughs, in the Bronx, Brooklyn and Staten Island, that will
remain open, and most locations have reopened after being forced to
temporarily close due to COVID-19.

                    About J.C. Penney Corp.

J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., is an American retail company,
founded in 1902 by James Cash Penney and today engaged in marketing
apparel, home furnishings, jewelry, cosmetics, and cookware. The
company was called J.C. Penney Stores Company from 1913 to 1924,
when it was reincorporated as J.C. Penney Co.

On May 15, 2020, JCPenney announced that it has entered into a
restructuring support agreement with lenders holding 70% of
JCPenney's first lien debt. The RSA on templates agreed-upon terms
for a pre-arranged financial restructuring plan that is expected to
reduce several billion dollars of indebtedness. To implement the
Plan, the Company and its affiliates on May 15, 2020, filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-20182).

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal advisor, Lazard is
serving
as financial advisor, and AlixPartners LLP is serving as
restructuring advisor to the Company.  Prime Clerk is the claims
agent, maintaining the page http://cases.primeclerk.com/JCPenney


J.C. PENNEY: Still Working on Deal for Going Concern Sale
---------------------------------------------------------
Sindhu Sundar of WWD reports that J.C. Penney said it is still
working toward a deal on a going concern sale.  The retailer's
advisers told a Texas bankruptcy court on Wednesday that
constructive negotiations are still ongoing, and that the company
believes it is close to an agreement.

The retailer, which entered into Chapter 11 in May, has in recent
weeks highlighted its plans to execute a swift going-concern sale
as part of its efforts to reorganize into a property company and an
operating one.

J.C. Penney's attorney Joshua Sussberg of Kirkland & Ellis LLP has
told the court that the company has received multiple bids so far,
including from first lien lenders who had submitted a bid for the
so-called Prop Co. and Op Co., as well as three additional ones for
the operating company, which would comprise retail operations, some
real estate, inventory and intellectual property.

The ongoing discussions will determine what the bidder group for
the company's business would look like.  Sussberg has told the
court the retailer believes it is close to a deal.  Another hearing
on updates in the case is expected to take place next week.  

On Wednesday, the retailer also obtained the court's approval for
auction procedures on the sale of several dozen leases on stores
that it plans to shut down.  Penney's, which said in June that it
is planning to close some 152 locations, has signaled plans to sell
the leases on 142 stores that it is in the process of closing.
Store closing sales have been ongoing, and the auctions on the
leases to be sold are scheduled for Sept. 14 and Sept 15.   

"The auction procedures will streamline the debtors' efforts to
capture substantial value from leases that they would otherwise be
rejecting," an attorney for the retailer told the court during the
hearing.

The ability to reject and assume leases, which is part of the
process in deciding which stores to close and which to keep and
often renegotiate the terms on, is a key feature of the Chapter 11
process for retailers.  Retailers can also use the bankruptcy
process to market leases for sale, and often characterize it as a
way to extract value from the leases of stores that are being shut
down.

In court filings, J.C. Penney has described these planned lease
auctions of stores being closed as part of efforts toward
"rationalizing" its real estate assets.

"To that end, the debtors and their advisers have performed a
comprehensive review of their real estate portfolio and have
commenced the process of rejecting burdensome unexpired leases,
conducting certain store closing sales...at certain of the debtors'
locations, and renegotiating the terms of leases where a go-forward
location may be feasible," the company said in a recent court
filing.

                        About J.C. Penney

J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., is an American retail company,
founded in 1902 by James Cash Penney and today engaged in marketing
apparel, home furnishings, jewelry, cosmetics, and cookware.  The
company was called J.C. Penney Stores Company from 1913 to 1924,
when it was reincorporated as J.C. Penney Co.

On May 15, 2020, JCPenney announced that it has entered into a
restructuring support agreement with lenders holding 70% of
JCPenney's first lien debt.  The RSA contemplates agreed-upon terms
for a pre-arranged financial restructuring plan that is expected to
reduce several billion dollars of indebtedness.

To implement the Plan, the Company and its affiliates on May 15,
2020, filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
20-20182).

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal advisor, Lazard is serving
as financial advisor, and AlixPartners LLP is serving as
restructuring advisor to the Company.  Prime Clerk is the claims
agent, maintaining the page http://cases.primeclerk.com/JCPenney


JAGGED PEAK: David Cook Objects to Joint Plan of Liquidation
------------------------------------------------------------
David Cook objects to confirmation of the Joint Chapter 11 Plan of
Liquidation of Jagged Peak, Inc., TradeGlobal, LLC, TradeGlobal
North America Holdings, Inc., and Jagged Peak Canada, Inc., and
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

Mr. Cook objects to the injunction provision of the Plan set forth
in Section 12.12 as it has the effect of expanding, by way of an
injunction, the releases given in the Plan.

Mr. Cook avers that to the extent the releases, injunctions, and
exculpations in the Plan release Non-Debtors from claims held by
creditors of the Debtors, such provisions are impermissible.

Mr. Cook objects to confirmation of the Plan to the extent
necessary to clarify that nothing in the Plan, Global Settlement
Agreement, any order entered confirming the Plan, or any other
order or document relating to the Plan permits or authorizes the
release, injunction, or exculpation of (a) SingPost Released Claims
held by parties other than the Debtor Release Parties or (b) Mr.
Cook's claims in the Ohio Litigation against any non-Debtors.

A full-text copy of David Cook's objection to confirmation of the
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation dated July 10, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y7laz5c7 from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

Attorneys for Creditor David Cook:

         SYLVESTER & POLEDNAK, LTD.
         Jeffrey R. Sylvester, Esq.
         1731 Village Center Circle
         Las Vegas, Nevada 89134
         Jeffrey A. Marks, Esq.
         Anthony L. Osterlund, Esq.

         VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE, LLP
         301 E. Fourth St., Suite 3500
         Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

                       About Jagged Peak

Jagged Peak Inc. and its subsidiaries are software companies in
Tampa, Florida. The Debtors deliver end-to-end global eCommerce
solutions that help companies break into new markets and build
customer base by creating a seamless experience across borders for
all product types.

Jagged Peak, Inc., based in Tampa, FL, and its affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 19-15959) on
Sept. 16, 2019.  In the petitions signed by CRO Jeremy Rosentha,
Jagged Peak, and TradeGlobal, LLC, were estimated to have assets of
$50 million to $100 million and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million; and TradeGlobal North America Holding, Inc., was estimated
to have assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of less
than $50,000.

The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa oversees the cases.

Gregory E. Garman, Esq., at Garman Turner Gordon, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.  BMC Group, Inc., is the claims
and noticing agent to the Debtors.


KM-T.E.H. REALTY 10: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Aug. 11, 2020, disclosed in a
court filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has
been appointed in the Chapter 11 case of KM-TEH Realty 10, LLC.
  
                    About KM-T.E.H. Realty 10

KM-T.E.H. Realty 10, LLC, is a single asset real estate (as defined
in 11 U.S.C. Section  101(51B)), whose principal assets are located
at 3601 E Meyer Blvd., Kansas City, Mo.

KM-T.E.H. Realty 10 sought Chapter 11 protection (W.D. Mo. Case No.
20-41151) on June 19, 2020.  At the time of the filing, Debtor was
estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Dennis R. Dow is the case judge.

Debtor has tapped Kent Dryer, Esq., at Dryer Law Firm, LLC, as
counsel.


LE TOTE: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
---------------------------------------------------
John Fitzgerald, III, acting U.S. trustee for Region 4, on Aug. 12
appointed a committee to represent unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 cases of Le Tote Inc. and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     1. The CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc.
        11 W. 42nd Street
        New York, NY 10036

     2. Liquidity Capital II, L.P.
        P.O. Box 10008 Willow House, Cricket Square
        Grand Cayman, KY1-1001
        Cayman Islands

     3. G-III Leather Fashions, Inc.
        308 Herrod Blvd.
        Dayton, NJ 08810
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                        About Le Tote Inc.

Le Tote, Inc. and its affiliates operate both an online,
subscription-based clothing rental service and a full-service
fashion retailer with 38 brick-and-mortar locations and a robust
e-commerce platform.  In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Le Tote
temporarily closed all retail locations in March 2020, although
they continue to operate the Le Tote and Lord & Taylor websites.

Le Tote and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 20-33332) on
Aug. 2, 2020.  At the time of the filing, Debtors disclosed assets
of between $100 million and $500 million and liabilities of the
same range.

Debtors have tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP as their legal counsel, Kutak Rock LLP as local
counsel, Berkeley Research LLC as financial advisor, and Nfluence
Partners as investment banker.  Stretto is the notice, claims and
balloting agent and administrative advisor.


LILIS ENERGY: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
----------------------------------------------------
Lilis Energy, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas to authorize the bidding procedures in connection
with the auction sale of substantially all assets.

The Motion is being filed solely as a precautionary alternative. As
set forth in the Declaration of Joseph C. Daches in Support of
Chapter 11 Petitions and First Day Pleadings and the restructuring
support agreement ("RSA"), the preferred path of the Debtors, the
Consenting RBL Lenders, and Värde Partners, Inc. -- holder of
approximately $25.7 million of Prepetition Affiliate RBL Loans
(Junior Tranche), all preferred equity, and approximately 10.37% of
common equity -- is a consensual chapter 11 plan that will be
funded with a $55 million new money equity commitment from Värde
("Värde Equity Investment").  

The Debtors are filing the Motion so that, in the event Värde
elects not to proceed with the Värde Equity Investment by Aug. 17,
2020, the Debtors will be prepared to quickly pivot to a sales
process in accordance with the Bidding Procedures, which were
heavily negotiated with, and have the support of, the Consenting
RBL Lenders, and Värde.

In the days and weeks leading up to the Petition Date, the Debtors,
Värde, and the RBL Lenders engaged in extensive, arms'-length
negotiations in an effort to reach a consensual agreement on the
process for a restructuring best suited to address the Debtors'
needs.  Ultimately, the parties were able to reach agreement on the
RSA, which, importantly, provided for much-needed DIP Facility to
fund the Debtors' chapter 11 cases.

The RSA provides the Debtors with a path to a confirmable chapter
11 plan of reorganization that will maximize value for their
estates.  The RSA also provides that if, by Aug. 17, 2020, certain
conditions detailed therein have not been satisfied for the
Restructuring Transactions or waived, the Debtors, with the support
of the RSA Parties, will pursue the sales process contemplated by
the Bidding Procedures.

The Debtors may, by Sept. 25, 2020, in consultation with the
Consultation Parties, propose to select one or more parties that
have submitted an Bidder Qualification Summary and have
subsequently submitted a Bid that complies with the Bid
Requirements to act as the Stalking Horse Bidder with respect to
substantially all of the Debtors' Assets and provide such Stalking
Horse Bidder with the Bid Protections.

The aggregate amount that may be paid to a Stalking Horse Bidder on
account of any breakup fee will not exceed 3% of such Stalking
Horse Bidders proposed Purchase Price, and aggregate amount of any
expense reimbursement will not exceed $200,000.  

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Oct. 1, 2020, at 5:00 p.m. (CT)

     b. Initial Bid: Any initial Overbid to the Baseline Bid(s)
will be no less than the value of the Baseline Bid(s)'s Purchase
Price of the Assets, plus $500,000 plus the amount of the Bid
Protections, if such Baseline Bid was a Stalking Horse Bid.

     c. Deposit: Each Bid must be accompanied by a cash deposit in
an amount equal to the greater of (a) 10% of the cash portion of
the Purchase Price and (b) $5 million, to be submitted by wire
transfer to an escrow account to be identified and established by
the Debtors.

     d. Auction: If the Debtors receive two or more Qualified Bids
with respect to All Assets or the same or similar Asset Package, as
applicable, then the Debtors will conduct the Auction to determine
the Winning Bidder(s) with respect to such Assets.  The Auction
will take place at 11:00 a.m. (CT) on Oct. 6, 2020, and will be
held electronically via video/telephone, or at such later date,
time or other place, as selected by the Debtors or approved by
order of the Court.  If the Debtors receive one Qualified Bid with
respect to All Assets or the same or similar Asset Package, as
applicable, then the Debtors, in consultation with the Consultation
Parties, may select such Qualified Bid as the Winning Bid and
notify all other Bidders promptly thereafter.

     e. Bid Increments: $500,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Oct. 13, 2020 at (TBD) (CT)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Oct. 9, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (CT)

     h. The Agent and the DIP Agent will each have the right to
credit bid for the Assets.

The Debtors ask that the Court grants them authority, but with no
obligation, to (i) to select a Stalking Horse Bidder for
substantially all of their assets, and to enter into a Stalking
Horse Agreement with such Stalking Horse Bidder, and (ii) in
connection with any Stalking Horse Agreement with a Stalking Horse
Bidder, (a) provide a breakup fee and (b) agree to reimburse
reasonable and documented out-of-pocket fees and expenses.  

The Debtors ask that the Court approves the form of Auction and
Sale Notice.  They propose that within five business days of the
entry of the Bidding Procedures Order, they will serve the Auction
and Sale Notice and the Bidding Procedures Order upon all the
Notice Parties.

The Debtors also ask that the Court approves the form of Assumption
and Assignment Notice.  They propose the Assumption and Assignment
Procedures for notifying the Contract Counterparties of proposed
cure amounts in the event the Debtors decide to assume and assign
such contracts or leases in connection with the Sale.

On Sept. 21, 2020, the Debtors will file the Cure Notice with the
Court and serve the Cure Notice on the Contract Counterparties, and
will include to the Cure Notice the Contracts Schedule.  The
Assigned Contract Objection Deadline is Oct. 5, 2020, at 5:00 p.m.
(CT).

Finally, the Debtors ask that, upon entry of the Bidding Procedures
Order, the Court waives the 14-day stay requirements of Bankruptcy
Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) to the extent they may be applicable to
the Bidding Procedures Order.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yckjojxz from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                      About Lilis Energy

Lilis Energy, Inc. -- https://www.lilisenergy.com/ -- is a
publicly-traded, independent oil and natural gas company focused
on
the exploration, development, production, and acquisition of crude
oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids.  Headquartered in Fort
Worth, Texas, Lilis is a pure play Permian Basin company with
focused operations in the Delaware Basin.

Lilis Energy and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-33274)
on
June 28, 2020.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Debtors had total assets
of $258.6 million and total liabilities of $251.2 million.  

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Vinson & Elkins, LLP as legal counsel; Barclays
Capital, Inc., as investment banker and financial advisor; BDO,
USA LLP as accountant and tax advisor; and Stretto as notice,
claims and solicitation agent.



LUBY'S INC: Says Conditions Exist that Raise Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Luby's, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a
net loss of $3,803,000 on $68,561,000 of total sales for the
quarter ended March 11, 2020, compared to a net income of
$6,632,000 on $74,423,000 of total sales for the quarter ended
March 13, 2019.

At March 11, 2020, the Company had total assets of $203,297,000,
total liabilities of $112,685,000, and $90,612,000 in total
shareholders' equity.

The Company disclosed that conditions and events, in the aggregate,
exist that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
a going concern.  

The Company said, "The Company sustained a net loss of
approximately $15.2 million and cash flow from operations was a use
of cash of approximately $13.1 million in fiscal year ended August
28, 2019.  In the two quarters ended March 11, 2020 (a period prior
to the COVID-19 pandemic), the Company sustained a net loss of
$12.1 million and cash flow from operations was a use of cash of
$5.9 million.

"On March 13, 2020, shortly after the end of the Company's second
quarter, President Trump declared a national emergency in response
to the COVID-19 pandemic followed by Governor Greg Abbott of Texas
issuing a public health disaster for the state of Texas on March
19, 2020.  The Company took the necessary actions which further
stressed the liquid financial resources of the Company.  In
response, the company borrowed the remaining $1.4 million available
on its revolving line of credit with MSD Capital, borrowed $2.5
million on its Delayed Draw Term Loan, and applied for and received
a $10.0 million PPP Loan.  As of the date of this filing, the
Company has no undrawn borrowing capacity under the Credit
Agreement.  Further, the Company does not believe that it would be
able to secure any additional debt financing currently.

"The full extent and duration of the impact of the COVID-19
pandemic on our operations and financial performance is currently
unknown.  The Company's continuation as a going concern is
dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from
operations and its ability to generate proceeds from real estate
property sales to meet its obligations.  The above conditions and
events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  Notwithstanding
the aforementioned substantial doubt, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern.  The financial statements do not
include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on
the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and
classification of liabilities that may result should the Company be
unable to continue as a going concern Management has assessed the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern as of the balance
sheet date, and for at least one year beyond the financial
statement issuance date.  The assessment of a company's ability to
meet its obligations is inherently judgmental."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/zTERVT

Luby's, Inc. operates as a multi-brand restaurant company in the
United States.  It operates through three segments: Company-Owned
Restaurants, Franchise Operations, and Culinary Contract Services.
It was formerly known as Luby's Cafeterias, Inc.  The Company was
founded in 1947 and is headquartered in Houston, Texas.



MACHINE TECH: Trust Custodian Buying Adel Property for $129K
------------------------------------------------------------
Machine Tech, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Georgia to authorize the private sale of the real
property described as 202 Talley Street, Adel, Georgia to New
Vision Trust Custodian FBO Ernie M. Eden Roth, IRA, for $129,000.

The Debtor owns the Property.  

The Property is encumbered by a first priority lien in favor of
Respondent Trust Bank in the amount of $557,018, per proof of claim
no. 12.  It will be paid the net sale proceeds at closing.

Respondent Cook County Tax Commissioner claims a lien for property
taxes in the amount of $1,308, per proof of claim no. 12.  It will
be paid in full at closing.

Respondent Georgia Department of Revenue may claim liens for taxes
in the amount of $59,048, per proof of claim no. 1.

Respondent Georgia Department of Labor may claim liens for taxes.

The Property is further encumbered by a lien in favor of Respondent
FC Marketplace, LLC in the amount of $265,358, as evidenced by a
certain fi fa recorded on Lien Docket 52, Page 59, Cook County,
Georgia, records.

The Property is further encumbered by a lien in favor of Respondent
Steel Warehouse Co., LLC in the amount of $70,720, as evidenced by
a certain fi fa recorded on Lien Docket 75, Page 484, Colquitt
County, Georgia, records.

Pursuant to an agreement entered into between the Buyer and the
Debtor, the latter is to sell the Property for the gross amount of
$129,000, free and clear of liens, claims, and encumbrances.  The
Buyer is an unrelated, non-insider party.  The Debtor wishes to
sell the Property in a private sale with commission of 5% to be
collected at closing.

The Debtor is advised that the market value of the Property is
approximately $129,000.

The liens of Georgia Department of Revenue; Georgia Department of
Labor; FC Marketplace; Ryerson; and Steel Warehouse are in bona
fide dispute.

The Debtor feels that the offer submitted by the Buyer is fair and
reasonable under the circumstances and that a sale of the Property
would be beneficial to all parties in interest.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y4rywpl2 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                      About Machine Tech

Machine Tech, Inc., based in Adel, GA, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 19-71340) on Nov. 1, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Joseph A. Bell, president, the Debtor was
estimated to have $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities.  Wesley J. Boyer, Esq., at Boyer Terry
LLC serves as bankruptcy counsel.



MCCLATCHY CO: Chatham to Name Hunter as CEO Upon Emergence
----------------------------------------------------------
Chatham Asset Management, LLC on Aug. 7, 2020, announced that Tony
Hunter will become Chief Executive Officer of The McClatchy Company
(OTC: MNIQQ), following the local news company's emergence from
Chapter 11 and the completion of its Court-approved sale to
Chatham, in September. McClatchy's asset purchase agreement with
Chatham was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court on August 4,
2020. The transaction is expected to close in September 2020,
subject to customary closing conditions and the receipt of certain
regulatory approvals.

Mr. Hunter will succeed Craig Forman, McClatchy's CEO, who along
with the current board and Chairman Kevin McClatchy, will leave the
company upon McClatchy's emergence from its court-supervised
reorganization.

Mr. Hunter is an accomplished operating executive with extensive
experience successfully leading large scale media organizations. He
joined the Tribune Company in 1994, rising the ranks to Chief
Executive Officer of Tribune Publishing and Publisher of the
Chicago Tribune, a role he held from 2008 to 2016.

During his tenure at Tribune, he led the company through bankruptcy
amid a global recession and transformed the traditional publishing
business into a thriving and competitive media and business
services company. Mr. Hunter led the reinvention of Tribune's
business model in a rapidly evolving business environment,
investing in local differentiated content, new digital products and
services, and brokering innovative strategic partnerships and
initiatives.

"Tony is an energetic, adaptive innovator with unparalleled
expertise in the publishing industry. At this critical time for
journalism, we are confident that his proven track record of
implementing positive change and enhancing digital capabilities
will serve McClatchy well. We look forward to furthering
McClatchy's legacy of informing readers and providing meaningful
value to the clients and communities its publications serve," said
Chatham.

"McClatchy has a well-earned reputation for independent journalism
in the public interest, and I am humbled to lead this institution
alongside Chatham, a longtime supporter of McClatchy and the
publishing industry," said Mr. Hunter. "Craig and his team have had
impressive success in transitioning to a digital business model,
which we intend to accelerate. While honoring its past and
continuing its commitment to essential local reporting, we will
chart a new, sustainable path for McClatchy focused on customers,
operational excellence, and organizational agility."

"I have known Tony for several years, and we share mutual respect
for one another and this industry. McClatchy is well positioned to
grow from the strong foundation we have put in place," said Mr.
Forman.

Previously, Mr. Hunter served as Chairman of Nucleus Marketing
Solutions, a collaborative venture between McClatchy, Gannett,
Hearst, and Tribune, from 2016 to 2019, as well as Chairman of the
News Media Alliance and a member of the Board of the Alliance for
Audited Media. He serves on the Board of Metropolitan Family
Services and is a former board member of United Way of Metro
Chicago. Mr. Hunter earned a B.A. from Coe College, an M.B.A. from
DePaul University, and is a non-practicing CPA.

                      About McClatchy Co.

The McClatchy Co. (OTC-MNIQQ) -- https://www.mcclatchy.com/ --
operates 30 media companies in 14 states, providing each of its
communities local journalism in the public interest and advertising
services in a wide array of digital and print formats.
McClatchypublishes iconic local brands including the Miami Herald,
The Kansas City Star, The Sacramento Bee, The Charlotte Observer,
The (Raleigh) News & Observer, and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

McClatchy is headquartered in Sacramento, Calif., and listed on the
New York Stock Exchange American under the symbol MNI.

On Feb. 13, 2020, The McClatchy Company and 53 affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-10418) with
a Plan of Reorganization that will cut $700 million of funded debt
in half.

McClatchy was estimated to have $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and debt of at least $1 billion as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The cases are pending before the Honorable Michael E. Wiles.

The Debtors tapped Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
general bankruptcy counsel; Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as
co-bankruptcy counsel with Skadden; Groom Law Group as special
counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial advisor; and Evercore
Inc. as investment banker. Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the
claims agent.


METAL PARTNERS: Agrees to Terminate Exclusivity as to Committee
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors Metal Partners Rebar, LLC with BRG Holding, LLC, BCG Ownco,
LLC, BGD LV Holding, LLC, and the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada
to terminate the period within which the Debtors have the exclusive
right to file a bankruptcy-exit plan as to the Committee only
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1121(d)(1).

The Debtors and the Committee have agreed to terminate the
exclusivity period, which is set to expire on October 14, 2020, to
ensure that the Committee has the ability to file its own plan, if
necessary, to efficiently proceed to confirmation of a plan of
reorganization.

                   About Metal Partners Rebar

Metal Partners Rebar, LLC, and four affiliates concurrently filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 20-12878) on June 16, 2020. The
petitions were signed by Joseph Tedesco, chief financial officer.

At the time of the filing, Metal Partners Rebar disclosed estimated
assets of $10 million to $50 million and estimated liabilities of
$50 million to $100 million; BGD LV Holding, LLC disclosed
estimated assets of $0 to $50,000 and estimated liabilities of the
same range; BRG Holding, LLC disclosed estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and estimated liabilities of $10 million to
$50 million; and BCG Ownco, LLC disclosed estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and estimated liabilities of $10 million to
$50 million.

The Honorable Mike K. Nakagawa oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Larson & Zirzow, LLC as general reorganization
co-counsel; High Ridge Partners, LLC as financial advisor; and SSG
Advisors, LLC as investment banker.

On July 14, 2020, the Office of United States Trustee appointed an
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the case.  The
Committee has retained as counsel:

     Cathrine M. Castaldi, Esq.
     Max Schlan, Esq.
     BROWN RUDNICK LLP
     2211 Michelson Dr., Seventh Floor
     Irvine, CA 92612
     Telephone: (949) 752-7100
     E-mail: ccastaldi@brownrudnick.com
             mschlan@brownrudnick.com

          - and -

     Ryan J. Works, Esq.
     Amanda M. Perach, Esq.
     McDONALD CARANO LLP
     2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 1200
     Las Vegas, NV Nevada 89102
     Telephone: (702) 873-4100
     E-mail: rworks@mcdonaldcarano.com
             aperach@mcdonaldcarano.com  



METAL PARTNERS: Sept. 24 Auction of Substantially All Assets Set
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge August N. Landis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada authorized the bidding procedures proposed by
Metal Partners Rebar, LLC and its debtor affiliates in connection
with the sale of substantially all their assets to JRC OpCo, LLC,
subject to overbid.

The Stalking Horse Purchaser has agreed to: (a) acquire
substantially all of the Debtors' assets for a cash payment of an
amount equal to the outstanding debt owed to JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A, immediately prior to closing, under the Prepetition Credit
Agreement and the Pos-tpetition Credit Agreement collectively, less
$2 million, and the assumption of certain related operating
liabilities, and (b) serve as a "Stalking Horse Bidder," subject to
certain bid protections and other bidding and sale procedures.

The Debtors are authorized to execute the Amended Stalking Horse
Agreement.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Sept. 23, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (PT)

     b. Initial Bid: The aggregate consideration in a Bid must have
a cash purchase price for the Purchased Assets of at least $34.5
million plus $250,000, less $1.65 million if such Bid is a Non-Real
Estate Bid; provided, that with respect to a Real Estate Only Bid
the aggregate consideration in a Bid must be not less than $1.65
million.

     c. Deposit: 5% of the cash and the value of the non-cash
purchase price allocated to the Purchased Assets under the Modified
APA

     d. Auction: The Sale Manager, on behalf of the Debtors, in
consultation with the Committee and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., is
authorized to conduct an auction with respect to the Purchased
Assets in accordance with the Bidding and Sale Procedures.  The
Auction, if needed, will take place on Sept. 24, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.
(PT) via encrypted Zoom video conference facilitated by the offices
of Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, or such other date, time, or
means as the Sale Manager, in consultation with the Committee and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., may notify all Qualified Bidders.

     e. Bid Increments: Any Overbid with respect to Bids for all
the Purchased Assets and for any Non-Real Estate Bids will be made
in increments of at least $200,000.  The Bidding increments
regarding any Real Estate Only Bids will be made in increments of
at $50,000.  The amount of the Purchase Price of any Overbid will
not be less than the Purchase Price of the Opening Bid for the
Round Leading Bid, as applicable.  

     f. Sale Hearing: Sept. 30, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. (PT).  Any party
wishing to attend the hearing can do so via AT&T Teleconference at:
(848) 684-8852, Access Code 8242009#.

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Sept. 16, 2020

Within two Business Days after the entry of the Order, or as soon
thereafter as practicable, the Debtors (or their agents) will serve
a copy of the Order and the Bidding and Sale Procedures upon all
interested parties.  On the Mailing Date, or as soon thereafter as
practicable, the Debtors (or their agents) will serve the Sale
Notice upon all known creditors of the Debtors.

The Break-Up Fee, to the extent payable under the Amended Stalking
Horse Agreement, is approved.  The Debtors are authorized to pay
the Break-Up Fee, pursuant to and subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Amended Stalking Horse Agreement.  Upon
entry of the Order, the Break-Up Fee will be treated as a senior
priority post-petition debt under Section 364 (d) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The Assumption and Assignment Procedures as set forth in the Motion
are approved.  The Assumption and Assignment Procedures and the
Cure Notice are appropriate and are approved.  No less than two
business days after the entry of the Order, the Debtors will serve
the Cure Notice on each non-Debtor counterparty to an executory
contract or unexpired lease that may be assumed and assigned.

The Contract/Lease Objection Deadline is Sept. 16, 2020.  The
Adequate Assurance Objection Deadline is Sept. 29, 2020.

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rules
6004(h), 6006(d), 7052, 9014 or otherwise, the terms and conditions
of the Order will be immediately effective and enforceable upon its
entry.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y4x7a76e from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Aug. 7, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.

                 About Metal Partners Rebar

Metal Partners Rebar, LLC and four affiliates concurrently filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 20-12878) on June 16, 2020.  The
petitions were signed by Joseph Tedesco, chief financial officer.
At the time of the filing, Metal Partners Rebar, LLC disclosed
estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and estimated
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million; BGD LV Holding, LLC
disclosed estimated assets of $0 to $50,000 and estimated
liabilities of the same range; BRG Holding, LLC disclosed estimated
assets of $1 million to $10 million and estimated liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million; and BCG Ownco, LLC disclosed estimated
assets of $1 million to $10 million and estimated liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million.

Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP as their
bankruptcy counsel; Larson & Zirzow, LLC as general reorganization
co-counsel; High Ridge Partners, LLC as financial advisor; and SSG
Advisors, LLC as investment banker.


MEYZEN FAMILY: Trustee's Aug. 26 Auction of All Resto Assets Set
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert D. Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York authorized the bidding procedures proposed by
Fred Stevens, Chapter 11 Trustee for Meyzen Family Realty
Associates, LLC and La Cremaillere Restaurant Corp., in connection
with the sale of the estates' interest in substantially all of the
real and personal property located at 46 Bedford Banksville Road,
Bedford, New York, including the restaurant known as La
Cremaillere, and certain assets related to the  prior operation of
La Cremaillere, to La Cremaillere II, LLC for $1.5 million,
pursuant to their Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated June 23,
2020, subject to overbid.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Aug. 24, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (EST)

     b. Minimum Bid: At a minimum, the Bid must have a Purchase
Price that has a monetary value in cash or other cash equivalents
equal to or greater than $1.57 million, representing the Stalking
Horse Bid Purchase Price ($1.5 million), plus the maximum amount of
the Expense Reimbursement ($50,000), plus a minimum overbid of
$20,000.  Any Bid proposal must provide that any conveyance of the
Restaurant Assets will be on an "as is, where is" basis and without
representations or warranties of any kind, except any
representations and warranties of the Potential Bidder.

     c. Deposit: 10% of the proposed purchase price

     d. Auction:  If an Auction is conducted, it will take place at
the offices of Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP,
200 West 41st Street, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10036, on Aug.
26, 2020, starting at 10:00 a.m. (EST), or at such other date and
time or other place, as may be determined by the Trustee at or
prior to the Auction.

     e. Bid Increments: $20,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Sept. 2, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. (EST)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Aug. 28, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (EST)

     h. Closing: No later than Sept. 18, 2020

The Sale Notice is approved.  By no later than two business days
after the entry of the Order, the Trustee will cause a copy of the
Bidding Procedures, the Sale Notice and the Order to be served upon
the Notice Parties and the Scheduled and Filed Creditors.

By no later than Aug. 27, 2020, the Trustee will file with the
Court. and will serve upon the Notice Parties and the Scheduled and
Filed Creditors a notice of selection of the highest and best bid
at Auction setting forth the identity of the Successful Bidder and
the Backup Bidder and the general terms of each party's Bid.

The Trustee will file the Assumption Schedule with the Court no
later than Aug. 27, 2020 with notice thereof served upon all
counterparties to the proposed Assigned Contracts and the Notice
Parties and Scheduled and Filed Creditors.  The Assumption
Objection Deadline is Sept. 1, 2020.

The Trustee's designation of La Cremailere II as the Stalking Horse
Bidder is approved.  The Trustee's entry into the Stalking Horse
PSA is authorized and approved, provided that the consummation of
the Transactions contemplated by the Stalking Horse PSA will be
subject to the entry of the Sale Order by the Court and the
satisfaction of the conditions precedent to Closing on the terms
set forth in the Stalking Horse PSA.

Solely to the extent provided by Section 8.1 of the Stalking Horse
PSA, in the event the Stalking Horse Bidder is not the Successful
Bidder, the Expense Reimbursement will be payable by the Debtors
(from proceeds of closing of an Alternative Transaction) and
granted allowed super-priority administrative expense status and
will be superior to all other administrative expense claims against
the Debtors.

Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d), the Order
will not be stayed for 14 days after its entry, and will be
effective and enforceable immediately upon entry.

A copy of the Stalking Horse APA and the Bidding Procedures is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y5mrc4wa from PacerMonitor.com
free of charge.
          
                   About Meyzen Family Realty

Meyzen Family Realty Associates, LLC owns a property located at 46
BedfordBanksville Road, Bedford, N.Y., from which La Cremaillere
Restaurant Corp. as lessee operates its business.  The company
valued the property at $2.8 million.

Meyzen sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-23419) on Sept. 13, 2018.  La
Cremaillere filed Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
19-22823) on April 17, 2019.

At the time of the filing, Meyzen disclosed $2.8 million in assets
and $1.45 million in liabilities.  La Cremaillere disclosed assets
of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  

Judge Robert D. Drain oversees the cases.  

The Debtors tapped Bruce H. Bronson Jr., Esq., at Bronson Law
Offices, P.C., as their counsel.



MJJW PORTFOLIO: Wright Buying Tampa Property for $410K
------------------------------------------------------
MJJW Portfolio, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to authorize the sale of the real property
located at 2131 West Main Street, Tampa, Florida to Wright Property
Brokers, LLC for $410,000.

On June 23, 2020, the Debtor executed an "As Is" Commercial
Contract for Sale and Purchase through which the Debtor intends to
sell the Real Property to Wright Property for the agreed purchase
price.  The sale of the property is presently set to occur on July
21, 2020.

Upon information and belief, the only parties who may claim a lien
against the Real Property is Sandra Gann Trustee in the approximate
amount of $80,000, the Hillsborough County Tax Collector in the
amount of $5,400, the City of Tampa in the amount of $3,404. and
the City of Tampa Code Enforcement in the amount of $3,500.  All
claims secured by the Real Property will be paid the full amount of
their allowed claims at the closing of the sale.  Through the
motion, the Debtor is asking an order authorizing it to sell the
Real Property free and clear of all liens.

The Debtors ask authority from the Court to sell the Real Property
"as is" and "where is," free and clear of any potential liens, with
valid and enforceable liens attaching to the proceeds of the sale.
The Taxes and ordinary closing costs, including broker's fees, will
be paid at closing.

Although the Purchaser is owned by insiders of the Debtor, it is
paying fair market value for the Real Property.

Finally, the Debtor asks that the 14-day stay required under
Bankruptcy Rule Section 6004(h) be waived, and that any order
granting the Motion is effective immediately upon entry.

A copy of the Contract is available at https://tinyurl.com/ybwc85zq
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                      About MJJW Portfolio

MJJW Portfolio, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-07533).  The Debtor
tapped Miriam L. Sumpter-Richard, Esq., at Fresh Start Law Firm,
P.A., as its bankruptcy counsel.


MONTAGE RESOURCES: Moody's Places B2 CFR on Review for Upgrade
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service placed the ratings of Montage Resources
Corporation's on review for upgrade, including its B2 Corporate
Family Rating, its B2-PD Probability of Default Rating and B3
ratings on the company's senior unsecured notes.

The review of Montage's ratings follows the announcement [1] that
Montage and Southwestern Energy Company (Southwestern, Ba2 stable)
have reached an agreement in which Southwestern will acquire
Montage in an all stock deal. Southwestern will issue 1.8656 shares
for each share of Montage, valuing the Montage equity at $205
million and the enterprise (including debt) at $865 million. The
acquisition, which is subject to Montage's shareholder approval and
regulatory reviews, is expected to close in the fourth quarter
2020.

This transaction is favorable for Southwestern as it adds to the
company's Appalachian acreage in both Marcellus rich gas and Utica
dry gas windows, and will marginally improve its leverage profile
post-acquisition. The combined company will be the third largest
Appalachian producer with an expected production scale increased by
about 25% to 500 mboe per day. However, the commodity price
environment remains challenging and the transaction is relatively
small compared to Southwestern's enterprise value. Therefore,
Southwestern's Ba2 CFR and stable outlook have not been affected.

"The potential ownership by Southwestern is a positive for Montage
given Southwestern's stronger credit profile," stated Arvinder
Saluja, Moody's Vice President - Senior Analyst. "In addition,
Southwestern plans to retire a portion of Montage's 2023 senior
notes using proceeds of an equity issuance."

On Review for Upgrade:

Issuer: Montage Resources Corporation

Probability of Default Rating, Placed on Review for Upgrade,
currently B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Placed on Review for Upgrade, currently
B2

Senior Unsecured Notes, Placed on Review for Upgrade, currently B3
(LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Montage Resources Corporation

Outlook, Changed to Rating Under Review from Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE / FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR
DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Montage's ratings were placed on review for upgrade based on the
company's potential ownership by Southwestern which has stronger
credit profile and financial resources. If Montage's remaining
notes remain outstanding and are guaranteed by Southwestern then
the ratings on the notes would be upgraded to Ba3, the same as
Southwestern's senior notes.

If Montage notes were to remain unguaranteed by Southwestern post
acquisition but the latter provides separate audited financial
statements pertaining to Montage going forward, then its ratings
would likely be upgraded based on anticipated parental support.
However, in the latter case, the ratings upgrade would likely be
limited to one or two notches unless there are significant changes
to Montage's stand-alone credit profile.

Montage Resources Corporation is a publicly traded exploration and
production company that operates in the Utica and Marcellus Shales.
The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas. Southwestern Energy
Company is a US independent exploration and production (E&P)
company headquartered in Houston, Texas.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.


MURPHY SHIPPING: Case Summary & 9 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Murphy Shipping & Commercial Services, Inc.
          dba Murphy Global Logistics
        2001 Timberloch PL
        Suite 500
        The Woodlands, TX 77380

Business Description: Murphy Shipping & Commercial Services, Inc.
                      -- http://www.murphyship.com-- is a full
                      service logistics company offering
                      customized, integrated solutions to meet the
                      needs of every type of partner, from any
                      industry.  Murphy Global is based in
                      Houston, TX, and provides domestic logistics
                      support in addition to international
                      logistics coordination.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas

Case No.: 20-34049

Debtor's Counsel: Kevin S. Wiley, Sr., Esq.
                  WILEY LAW GROUP, PLLC
                  325 N. St. Paul
                  Suite 2250
                  Dallas, TX 75201
                  Tel: (214) 537-9572
                  E-mail: kwiley@wileylawgroup.com

Total Assets: $1,576,696

Total Liabilities: $82,947

The petition was signed by Jerry Rowell, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's nine unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

               https://tinyurl.com/yyr63kup


NAI CAPITAL: Aug. 14 Due for ROX to Reply to All Assets Sale
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Deborah J. Saltzman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California extended the deadline for ROX TRG
Towers Gateway Owners, LLC to file a response to the NAI Capital,
Inc.'s sale of substantially all assets to D/AQ Corp., doing
business as DAUM Commercial Real Estate Services for approximately
$3,258,864, in accordance with the terms of the Asset Purchase
Agreement, from Aug. 12, 2020 to Aug. 14, 2020 at 12:00 p.m.

Daum's consideration consists of four components:  (1) Daum is not
acquiring any of the Debtor's existing cash; (2) Daum is paying the
Debtor $750,000 of cash at the Closing; (3) Daum is leaving behind
for the Debtor's bankruptcy estate all commissions that will be
owing to the Debtor from all pending sale and lease transactions,
which the Debtor estimates will net the Debtor's bankruptcy estate
approximately $1,428,864 after payment of all related broker
commissions; and (4) Daum will be paying to the Debtor's bankruptcy
estate over the next three years 3% of all net commissions received
by Daum, after the Brokers have been paid their share, from sale
and lease transactions consummated by the Debtor's Brokers who
become associated with Daum for each of the first three years
following the Closing.

The sale will be free and clear of all Encumbrances.

On Aug.11, 2020, the Debtor filed a stipulation to extend the
deadline for ROX TRG to file a response to the Motion to Aug. 14,
2020 at 12:00 p.m.

Having reviewed and considered the Stipulation, the Motion, the
Notice, and the record in the case, and the Court approved the
Stipulation.

                        About NAI Capital

NAI Capital, Inc. is a commercial real estate and property
management company based in Encino, California. It specializes in
the leasing and sale of office, the sale of investments, land and
residential income, tenant representation, and corporate services.
The Company was founded in 1979.

NAI Capital, Inc., based in Encino, CA, filed a Chapter 11
petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 20-10256) on Jan. 31, 2020. In the
petition signed by Chris Jackson, executive managing director and
authorized agent, the Debtor was estimated to have up to $1
million
to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  Judge Deborah J.
Saltzman oversees the case.

Debtor employed Levene Neale Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; McGarrigle Kenney & Zampiello, APC as special litigation
and corporate counsel; and Leitner, Zander & Co., LLP as
accountant.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee to represent
unsecured creditors on March 12, 2020.  The committee is
represented by David B. Shemano, Esq., at Shemanolaw.



NEIMAN MARCUS: Creditors' Committee Objects to Plan Disclosures
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in the
jointly administered bankruptcy cases of Neiman Marcus Group LTD
LLC and its debtor affiliates objects to the adequacy of the
Disclosure Statement for the Debtors' Joint Plan of
Reorganization.

The Committee claims that the Disclosure Statement does not contain
information sufficient to allow unsecured creditors to make an
informed decision whether to accept or reject the Plan and, in some
instances, contains incomplete or misleading information.

The Committee points out that the discussion of the Designation,
the Distribution, and the Recapitalization Transactions in the
Disclosure Statement is inadequate by failing to disclose potential
claims that exist against the Litigation Targets or the value of
such claims.

The Committee asserts that notwithstanding the potential causes of
action arising from the Designation, the Distribution, and the
Recapitalization Transactions, the Plan contains broad Debtor and
third party releases for the benefit of the Released Parties,
including the Litigation Targets.

The Committee further asserts that nothing in the Disclosure
Statement identifies exactly what Causes of Action are being
released, the value of such Causes of Action, the parties against
whom such Causes of Action may be asserted, the consideration each
such person is providing in exchange for the releases, or how each
such release is facilitating the restructuring of the Debtors or
otherwise benefiting the estates.

A full-text copy of the Committee's objection to the Disclosure
Statement dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/ycyrdseh from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Lead Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

          PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
          Richard M. Pachulski, Esq.
          Jeffrey N. Pomerantz, Esq.
          Alan J. Kornfeld, Esq.
          Maxim B. Litvak, Esq.
          Steven W. Golden, Esq.
          10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90067-4100
          Telephone: (310) 227-6910
          E-mail: rpachulski@pszjlaw.com
                  jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com
                  akornfeld@pszjlaw.com
                  mlitvak@pszjlaw.com
                  sgolden@pszjlaw.com

Co-Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecureds:

          Michael D. Warner, Esq.
          Benjamin L. Wallen, Esq.
          COLE SCHOTZ P.C.
          301 Commerce Street, Suite 1700
          Fort Worth, TX 76102
          Telephone: (817) 810-5250
          Facsimile: (817) 810-5255
          E-mail: mwarner@coleschotz.com
                  bwallen@coleschotz.com

                    About Neiman Marcus Group

Neiman Marcus Group LTD, LLC -- https://www.neimanmarcus.com/ -- is
a luxury omni-channel retailer conducting store and online
operations principally under the Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman,
and Last Call brand names. It also operates the Horchow e-commerce
website offering luxury home furnishings and accessories. Since
opening in 1907 with just one store in Dallas, Neiman Marcus and
its affiliates have strategically grown to 67 stores across the
United States.

Neiman Marcus Group LTD and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
20-32519) on May 7, 2020. At the time of the filing, the Debtors
were each estimated to have assets of between $1 billion and $10
billion and liabilities of the same range.

Judge David R. Jones oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis, LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International, LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Jackson Walker, LLP as
local counsel; Berkeley Research Group, LLC as restructuring
advisor; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; and Stretto
as claims, noticing and solicitation agent.


NESSALLA LLC: Gets Court Approval to Hire Restructuring Manager
---------------------------------------------------------------
NessAlla, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Wisconsin to employ Brian Ellison as its
restructuring manager.

Mr. Ellison's duties are as follows:

     (a) provide advice and possible direction for orienting
Debtor's business especially its product sales and inventory
management to maintain value in anticipation of a sale of its
assets;

     (b) assist in maintaining and facilitating sales and
production as a way to garner cash flow into the business for
sustained normal operation through the process in anticipation of a
sale of the assets; and

     (c) work to market the assets of Debtor as an operating
business to his contacts and other entities potentially interested
in participating in the sale process.

Debtor will pay its restructuring manager at the rate of $120 per
hour for court appearances and other actual legal proceedings, and
$80 per hour for other services.

Mr. Ellison disclosed in court filings that he is a "disinterested
person" within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Mr. Ellison holds office at:

     Brian Ellison
     2220 Eagle Dr,
     Middleton, WI 53562
     Phone: +1 608-831-1083

                         About NessAlla LLC

NessAlla LLC, a company engaged in the business of beverage
manufacturing, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Wis. Case No. 20-11746) on July 6, 2020.  At the
time of the filing, Debtor disclosed total assets of $850,688 and
total liabilities of $1,081,945.  DeMarb Brophy LLC represents
Debtor as legal counsel.


NORTHWEST COMPANY: Hires Mazars USA to Provide Tax Services
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Northwest Company, LLC and its affiliates seek approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
employ Mazars USA LLP.

Debtors require the services of the firm to prepare their federal
and state partnership income tax returns with supporting schedules
for the years ended Dec. 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2019, and to provide
other tax consulting services.

Mazars' hourly rates are as follows:

     Partner            $500 - $550
     Senior Manager     $385 - $475
     Manager            $295 - $330
     Senior             $220 - $265
     Staff              $145 - $195
     Paraprofessional   $160 - $230

Mazars is a "disinterested person" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Dennis Cancellarich
     Mazars USA LLP
     135 West 50th Street
     New York, NY 10020
     Tel: 888-792-6088
     Email: info@mazarsusa.com

             About Northwest Company and Northwest.com

The Northwest Company LLC and The Northwest.com LLC manufacture
branded home textiles, throws and blankets, which are sold through
major national retailers and on-line channels.  They operate from
their showroom in midtown Manhattan and in corporate offices in
Roslyn, N.Y. and Bentonville, Ark.  They also maintain a sourcing
office in Shanghai, China and operate a weaving facility in Ronda,
N.C.  Visit www.thenorthwest.com for more information.

Northwest Company and Northwest.com sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-10990)
on April 18, 2020.  At the time of the filing, Northwest Company
had estimated assets of between $10 million and $50 million and
liabilities of between $50 million and $100 million.  

Judge Michael E. Wiles oversees the cases.

Debtors have tapped Sills Cummis & Gross, P.C. as bankruptcy
counsel,  Clear Thinking Group, LLC as financial advisor, and Omni
Agent Solutions as claims, noticing and balloting agent.


OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM: Fitch Rates Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB/RR4'
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a 'BB'/'RR4' rating to Occidental
Petroleum Corp.'s proposed issuance of 5-, 8- and 10-year senior
unsecured notes, the proceeds of which will be used to repay
outstanding debt. Simultaneously, the company has commenced a $1.5
billion cash tender for a range of near-term maturities, including
its 2021 fixed- and floating-rate notes, 2022 fixed- and
floating-rate notes and 2023 2.7% notes.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Issuance Helps Bridge Maturity Wall: The announced senior unsecured
notes issuance, in conjunction with an earlier $2.0 billion
issuance in June, helps to bridge OXY's large maturity wall in the
absence of near-term asset sales. While OXY's maturity wall remains
a source of differentiated risk among peers, the current issuance
lowers event risk around possible liability management exercises in
the future.

Fitch expects that the combination of bond proceeds, FCF and
revolver availability should be sufficient to move the company past
its near-term maturities. Demonstrated market access should also
create flexibility around the timing of asset sales. Should the
unsecured bond market close to OXY in the future due to another
sustained oil price crash, the company maintains the flexibility to
issue secured or guaranteed debt under existing indentures.

Limited Traction on Asset Sales: OXY continues to see limited
near-term traction on asset sales. To date, the company has sold
around $5.6 billion, including its small position in the Greater
Natural Buttes asset in Utah for $69 million in June. OXY's
original asset sales targets have been upended by the coronavirus
pandemic-linked downturn, although the modest rebound in oil
pricing and fundamentals seen since the spring could still
accelerate a portion of sales.

Current guidance is for $2 billion in disposals by YE20, and the
company continues to guide to meeting the lower end of its target
of $10 billion in cumulative asset sales. Several of the company's
assets are less correlated to oil, including the Anadarko Petroleum
Corporation legacy land grant position comprising 5 million acres
across Wyoming, Utah and Colorado and consisting of 1 million
surface acres and the rights to 4 million subsurface acres, along
with other assets.

High Maturity Wall: OXY's near-term maturity wall is high, with
$4.4 billion due in 2021, $4.7 billion in 2022 and another $1.2
billion in 2023. About $479 million of maturities are due in 1Q21,
less than one year away. Maturities include $992 million in 2036
zero-coupon notes (legacy Anadarko notes), as it has recently been
economic for noteholders to put those notes back to the company.
The put feature in the notes is annual, with the next put date
October 2020.

Low Prices Increase Near-Term Leverage: In response to demand
reductions associated with coronavirus-related shutdowns, Fitch
lowered its base case WTI oil price deck to $32/barrel in 2020 and
$42/barrel in 2021, before flipping back to $50/barrel in 2022 and
$52/barrel in 2023. Lower oil prices, in conjunction with lower
expected asset sales and weaker midstream differentials, resulted
in elevated near-term leverage for OXY. For purposes of calculating
leverage, Fitch assigns 50% equity credit for the $10 billion in
Berkshire Hathaway 8% cumulative perpetual preferred stock based on
the structural features of the notes as analyzed under Fitch's
"Corporate Hybrids Treatment and Notching Criteria."

Organic Measures to Defend Credit: In response to the collapse in
oil prices, OXY announced the following credit defensive measures:
the near-elimination of its dividend (cut to $0.01/share), which
will reduce dividend payments by $2.8 billion on a run rate basis;
multiple reductions in 2020 capex, including the most recent cuts
to the $2.4 billion-$2.6 billion level; relief on cash payments for
the company's $10 billion Berkshire preferred notes; and early
achievement of increased overhead and opex synergy targets. In the
near term, FCF is also helped by OXY's 2020 hedge position of
approximately 350,000bpd of oil with a three-way collar, with
realized prices equal to Brent plus $10 at $45 or lower. Fitch
believes the company could shrink capex to enhance FCF further
should it choose this route.

Deal Should Strengthen Long-Term Profile: To the degree the company
overcomes its financing issues, Fitch believes the Anadarko
acquisition will ultimately strengthen OXY's business and
operational profile over the longer term, assuming a recovery in
oil prices. OXY's post-acquisition size has more than doubled to
just under 1.4 million boepd and, on a pro forma basis, par with
ConocoPhillips (A/Stable). Oxy is the largest producer in the
Permian and DJ basins, and a top producer in the Gulf of Mexico.
The ability to deploy OXY's technological, subsurface and
operational expertise to Anadarko's holdings (particularly in the
Permian) is expected to create significant value in a more
normalized oil price environment by lowering unit costs.

Integrated Producer: OXY enjoys modest, but meaningful integration
benefits through its chemicals segment, which has a top-three
position in most basic chemicals it produces in North America,
including chlorine, vinyl, PVC and caustic soda, and through its
midstream segment, including gas processing plants, pipelines, CO2
infrastructure, storage, power generation and gas marketing
businesses. Chemicals in particular historically contribute strong
FCF given their limited reinvestment needs, which the company has
been able to redeploy elsewhere. Diversification from non-E&P
businesses has dropped on a percentage basis following the Anadarko
acquisition but remains a source of differentiation from other
credits.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Rating Derivation versus Peers: OXY's credit profile is mixed.
OXY's rating is currently dominated by refinancing concerns given
the looming maturity wall and difficulty in meeting its maturity
schedule with organic cash flows even as the market for energy
assets remains hobbled by high volatility.

At the same time, the company has several long-term characteristics
of a high-grade credit. In terms of size and scale, at just under
1.4 million boepd, it is among the largest independents, in line
with ConocoPhillips, and is significantly larger than E&Ps such as
Devon Energy Corporation (BBB/Stable), Apache Corporation
(BB+/Stable) and Marathon Oil Corporation (BBB/Negative).

Upstream diversification is also above-average, given OXY's
number-one position in the Permian and the DJ, number-four position
in the GOM, and upstream diversification in Middle Eastern
countries, which remains a differentiating factor versus peers.
Integration with chemicals and midstream also sets OXY apart from
peers. No Country Ceiling, operating environment or
parent-subsidiary-linkages affect the rating.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

  -- Base Case WTI oil price of $32/barrel for the remainder of
2020, $42/barrel in 2021, $50/barrel in 2022 and $52/barrel in 2023
and the long term;

  -- Henry Hub natural gas prices of $1.85/mcf for the remainder of
2020 and $2.45/mcf across the forecast;

  -- Capex of $2.5 billion in 2020, $5.1 billion in 2021, $5.9
billion in 2022 and $6.7 billion in 2023;

  -- 90% of 2036 zero-coupon bonds assumed put to the company in
October 2020;

  -- $300 million in asset sales in 2020 and $2.2 billion in 2021,
with proceeds applied to debt paydown;

  -- Dividends of $1.6 billion in 2020, falling to de minimis
levels in 2021, before rising in line with a rising price deck.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to positive
rating action/upgrade:

  -- Sustained recovery in oil prices;

  -- Additional progress in redeeming or refinancing the company's
near-term maturity wall;

  -- Mid-cycle debt/EBITDA leverage at or below 3.5x;

  -- Mid-cycle FFO lease-adjusted leverage at or below 3.7x.

Factors that could, individually or collectively, lead to negative
rating action/downgrade:

  -- Further sustained leg down in oil prices;

  -- Excess reliance on revolver for refinancing of maturity wall,
especially if done without announced asset sales;

  -- Impairments to liquidity;

  -- Mid-cycle debt/EBITDA leverage above 3.7x;

  -- Mid-cycle FFO lease-adjusted leverage above 4.0x.

BEST/WORST CASE RATING SCENARIO

International scale credit ratings of Non-Financial Corporate
issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the
99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive
direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a
worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th
percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction)
of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and
worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges
from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are
based on historical performance.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Tight Liquidity: Liquidity is limited in the context of low oil
prices, limited asset sales and a large maturity wall. Unrestricted
cash on hand at June 30, 2020 was approximately $750 million and
there was no draw on the company's committed $5.0 billion senior
unsecured revolver (maturing January 2023) for total liquidity of
$5.75 billion. The company has maturities of up to $992 million in
October 2020, $4.4 billion in 2021, $4.7 billion in 2022 and an
additional $1.2 billion due 2023.

ESG Considerations

The highest level of environmental, social and governance credit
relevance, if present, is a score of 3. This means ESG issues are
credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity,
due to either their nature or the way in which they are being
managed by the entity.

REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF
RATING

The principal sources of information used in the analysis are
described in the Applicable Criteria.


OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM: Moody's Rates Senior Unsecured Notes 'Ba2'
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba2 rating to Occidental
Petroleum Corporation's proposed issuance of senior unsecured
notes. OXY's existing ratings, including its Ba2 Corporate Family
Rating and Ba2 senior unsecured rating are not affected by this
action. The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating is unchanged at
SGL-3. The rating outlook is negative.

OXY will use the proceeds of the proposed notes offering to
refinance upcoming debt maturities.

The Ba2 rating assigned to OXY's proposed unsecured notes issue is
the same as OXY's Ba2 CFR, reflecting the company's unsecured
capital structure.

"Occidental Petroleum's proposed notes offering is another step in
addressing the company's sizable near-term debt maturities,"
commented Andrew Brooks, Moody's Vice President. "OXY's credit
profile remains significantly weakened and its prospects for
near-term improvement are uncertain."

Assignments:

Issuer: Occidental Petroleum Corporation

Senior Unsecured Notes, Assigned Ba2 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

While OXY's acquisition of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation afforded
it strategic and cost benefits, it came at an excessive price which
was largely debt-financed, and at the very high cost of a
significantly eroded credit profile. The addition of Anadarko's
sizable position in the Delaware Basin added meaningful production
and proved reserves to OXY's core Permian Basin asset, with further
development opportunities across an enlarged asset footprint.
However, the full value of this significant acquisition has been
compromised by 2020's collapse in crude oil prices.

The value accorded OXY's $100 billion asset base, its operating
footprint that extends beyond North America and considerable EBITDA
generated from non-E&P assets has been compromised by the drop in
commodity prices and global demand stress. The stress imposed on
OXY's credit metrics by approximately $40 billion of
acquisition-related debt (OXY's September new issue notes and term
loan, Anadarko's legacy debt which was exchanged into new OXY debt,
proportionately consolidated Western Midstream debt and $10 billion
preferred) has materially weakened OXY's leverage metrics. The
challenges posed by its over-levered balance sheet have been
further exacerbated by the drop in crude oil prices and
commensurate reduction in cash flow.

OXY has reacted to the currently challenged oil price environment
with several recent defensive measures including the virtual
elimination of its cash dividend, a reduction in 2020's capital
spending of over 50%, operating cost reductions and the payment of
its preferred stock dividend in OXY common shares, which together
will reduce its annual cash outflow by almost $8 billion.

However, without significant and immediate debt reduction beyond
the $7 billion achieved in the latter half of 2019, on a run-rate
basis Moody's estimates that OXY's retained cash flow to debt
metric will remain well under 15% and E&P debt on production over
$30,000 per barrel of oil equivalent, both measures weak for the
company's rating.

The rapid spread of the coronavirus outbreak, deteriorating global
economic outlook, low oil prices, and high asset price volatility
have created an unprecedented credit shock across a range of
sectors and regions. Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a
social risk under its ESG framework, given the substantial
implications for public health and safety. OXY's negative outlook,
in part, reflects the impact on it of the deterioration in credit
quality it has triggered, given its exposure to oil prices, which
has left it vulnerable to shifts in market demand and sentiment in
these unprecedented operating conditions.

From a governance perspective, the composition of OXY's 11-member
Board of Directors was materially reconstituted in 2020 with the
addition of six new Board members including a new Chairman. Moody's
understands that the Board is highly focused on restoring OXY's
financial strength through debt reduction. The Board has also
adopted certain corporate governance-enhancing amendments to its
by-laws, and has created a new Oversight Committee that will work
closely with company management to provide regular Board input.

Moody's regards OXY's near-term liquidity as adequate, comprised of
$1.0 billion of balance sheet cash as of June 30 and an undrawn $5
billion revolving credit facility having a January 2023 scheduled
maturity date. The company should retain full access to its
revolver, which does not have a MAC clause, nor stringent covenant
limitations. Moreover, the dividend and capital spending cuts will
relieve stress on cash flow, enabling OXY to operate in a modestly
free cash flow mode.

Moody's expects that OXY will continue to prioritize debt
reduction. With the market for commodity-exposed and related asset
sales compromised by weak commodity prices, OXY's weakened
financial condition leaves the company with limited options for
further debt reduction as it confronts its near-term debt
maturities, which in the aggregate total $10 billion through 2022,
including its zero coupon notes which are puttable for $992 million
in October 2020. OXY intends to use proceeds from its proposed
notes issue, limited asset sale proceeds and free cash flow to
address its near-term debt maturities.

The outlook is negative reflecting the challenges OXY confronts as
it addresses its over-levered balance sheet in a weak oil and gas
market.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

Prospects for a ratings upgrade over the near-term are limited by
OXY's weak balance sheet. Debt reduction exceeding $10 billion,
debt on production approaching $20,000 per Boe and RCF/debt over
25% could support a rating upgrade. An inability to maintain
RCF/debt above 15% or a failure to achieve further debt reduction
could lead to a rating downgrade, as would the resumption of a
meaningful cash dividend or share buybacks.

Occidental Petroleum Corporation is a large, publicly traded
independent exploration and production with operations focused in
the Permian Basin, Colorado's DJ Basin, the Middle East in Oman,
Qatar and the UAE, Algeria and Ghana, and Colombia. It also has
significant Midstream and Chemicals businesses. The company is
headquartered in Houston, Texas.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.


ODYSSEY GROUP: Low Working Capital Casts Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------
Odyssey Group International, Inc., filed its quarterly report on
Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $1,876,659 on $0 of revenues
for the three months ended April 30, 2020, compared to a net loss
of $62,769 on $0 of revenues for the same period in 2019.

At April 30, 2020, the Company had total assets of $21,765,543,
total liabilities of $1,651,413, and $20,114,130 in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company said, "Substantial doubt exists as to our ability to
continue as a going concern based on the fact that we do not have
adequate working capital to finance our day-to-day operations.  The
Company has not realized any revenues for the quarters ended April
30, 2020 and 2019.  The Company has an operating deficit of
$6,508,028 as of April 30, 2020.  The operating deficit indicates
substantial uncertainty about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.  Management's plans include engaging in further
research and development and raising additional capital in the
short term to fund such activities through sales of its common
stock.  Management's ability to implement its plans and continue as
a going concern may be dependent upon raising additional capital.
Our continued existence depends on the success of our efforts to
raise additional capital necessary to meet our obligations as they
come due and to obtain sufficient capital to execute our business
plan.  We may obtain capital primarily through issuances of debt or
equity or entering into collaborative arrangements with corporate
partners.  There can be no assurance that we will be successful in
completing additional financing or collaboration transactions or,
if financing is available, that it can be obtained on commercially
reasonable terms.  If we are not able to obtain the additional
financing on a timely basis, we may be required to further scale
down or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.  The
issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a
significant dilution in the equity interests of our current
stockholders.  Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans
would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash
commitments.  Our financial statements do not include adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/08Pahw

Odyssey Group International, Inc. engages in selling, marketing,
and distributing of medical devices. Its product is CardioMap, a
non-invasive testing for heart disease. The company was founded in
2014 and is based in Irvine, California.



PATRIOT WELL: Sept. 14 Auction of Substantially All Assets Set
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge David R. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas authorized the bidding procedures proposed by
Patriot Well Solutions, LLC and its affiliates in connection with
the sale of substantially all assets to White Deer Energy L.P. II
or its designee, subject to overbid.

The Notice of Auction and Sale Hearing is approved and will be
served within three business days of entry of the Order, upon all
the Notice Parties.  

The notice to counterparties to the Assumed and Assigned Contracts
is approved.  Except as may otherwise be agreed to by the parties
to an Assumed and Assigned Contract (with the consent of the
Prevailing Bidder), all Cure Amounts will be paid by the Proposed
Purchaser or Prevailing Bidder.

No later than seven calendar days following the entry of the Order,
the Debtor will cause the Cure Notice to be served on any and all
counterparties to executory contracts and unexpired leases that may
be Assumed and Assigned Contracts pursuant to the APA.  The Cure
Objection Deadline is 14 calendar days of the date on which the
Cure Notice is served, not counting the day served.

The Debtor's request to approve the Break-Up Fee and Reimbursement
set forth in the Motion and the APA are held in abeyance pending
further order of the Court.  The Order is without prejudice to the
right of the Proposed Purchaser to ask approval of the Break-Up Fee
and Reimbursement or a "substantial contribution" claim under
section 503(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Sept. 9, 2020

     b. Initial Bid: The sum of (a) the total consideration to be
realized by the Debtor's estate pursuant to the terms of the APA,
(b) any applicable purchase price adjustments, as provided for in
the APA, and (c) $100,000

     c. Deposit: 10% of the purchase price, made payable to Sonoran
Capital Advisors, LLC

     d. Auction: In the event the Debtor receives more than one
Qualified Bid, the Debtor will conduct the Auction no later than
Sept. 14, 2020 unless such date is extended by agreement of the
Debtor, the Proposed Purchaser, and the DIP Lender, in consultation
with the Committee.  The Debtor will conduct the Auction virtually
through an online platform (such as Zoom).

     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Sept. 16, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. (CT)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Sept. 15, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (CT)

     h. The DIP Lender and the Debtor's prepetition secured lender,
White Deer Energy L.P. II ("Pre-Petition Lender"), is deemed to be
a Qualified Bidder for the Assets, and any such bid submitted by
the DIP Lender or Pre-Petition Lender will be deemed a Qualified
Bid for all purposes.  TCF National Bank and City National Bank of
Florida are deemed to be Qualified Bidders for the Assets.  

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rules
6004(h), 7062, 9014 or otherwise or any Local Rules of the Court,
the terms and conditions of the Order will be immediately effective
and enforceable upon its entry.

All time periods set forth in the Order will be calculated in
accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a).

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yy4k5ew4 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About Patriot Well Solutions

Patriot Well Solutions LLC provides well completion, production
and
intervention services for the energy industry.  It offers wireline
and perforating, coiled tubing and nitrogen, fluid pumping and
crane services.

Patriot Well Solutions sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 20-33642) on July 20,
2020.  At the time of the filing, Debtors disclosed assets of
between $10 million and $50 millionand liabilities of the same
range.

Judge Jeffrey P. Norman oversees the cases.

Debtors have tapped Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP as their legal
counsel, Sonoran Capital Advisors LLC as restructuring advisor,
Piper Sandler & Co. as financial advisor, and Stretto as claims
and
noticing agent.



PERMIAN HOLDCO 1: Sept. 29 Auction of Substantially All Assets
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mary F. Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware authorized the bidding procedures proposed by Permian
Holdco 1, Inc. and affiliates in connection with the sale of all or
substantially all of their assets to New Permian Holdco, Inc.,
subject to overbid.

As set forth more fully in the Stalking Horse APA, the Stalking
Horse Purchaser proposes to (i) credit bid $30 million on account
of the DIP Obligations and the Prepetition Secured Obligations,
(ii) assume certain liabilities and executory contracts and
unexpired leases of the Debtors, and (iii) satisfy cure costs.

In connection with resolving certain concerns raised by the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, the Lender will be
entitled to credit bid the Prepetition Lenders' claims in an amount
set forth in its proofs of claim filed with Epiq Corporate
Restructuring. LLC, the Debtors' claims and noticing agent [Proof
of Claim Nos. 10033 and 10034], plus any amounts outstanding under
the DIP Facility.

In the event the Committee seeks to challenge the Prepetition
Lenders' right to credit bid, the Committee will file such
challenge on Aug. 31, 2020 and if such challenge is filed, the
Court will hold a hearing on Sept. 15, 2020 at 10:30 a.m. (ET).

For all purposes under the Bidding Procedures, the Stalking Horse
Purchaser will be considered a Qualifying Bidder, and the Stalking
Horse APA will be considered a Qualifying Bid.

Rhe salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Sept. 23, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Initial Bid: The aggregate consideration proposed by the
Qualifying Bidder must equal or exceed the sum of the amount of (A)
the Purchase Price, and (B) $100,000.

     c. Deposit: 10% of the purchase price provided for in the
Alternative APA

     d. Auction: If no timely Qualifying Bids other than the
Stalking Horse APA are submitted on or before the Bid Deadline, the
Debtors will not hold an Auction and will request at the Sale
Hearing that this Court approve the Stalking Horse APA and the
transactions contemplated thereunder.  If the Debtors timely
receive one or more Qualifying Bids other than the Stalking Horse
APA, then the Debtors will conduct the Auction on Sept. 29, 2020
at 10:00 a.m. (ET), at the offices of Young Conaway Stargatt &
Taylor, LLP, 1000 North King Street, Wilmington, DE 19801, or
virtually via telephone and/or video conference pursuant to
information to be timely provided by the Debtors to the Auction
Participants.

     e. Bid Increments: $100,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Oct. 6, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. (ET)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Sept. 29, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (ET)

     h. Closing: Oct. 20, 2020

The Assumption and Assignment Procedures are approved.  On Sept.
14, 202, the Debtors will file with the Court and serve on each
counterparty to an Assumed Contract an Assumption Notice.  The
Contract Objection Deadline is Sept. 29, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

As soon as reasonably practicable after the completion of the
Auction, the Debtors will file with the Court a notice identifying
the Winning Bidder.  In the event the Stalking Horse Purchaser is
not the Winning Bidder, the Counterparties will file any Contract
Objections solely on the basis of adequate assurance of future
performance not later than Oct. 2, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Debtors' decision to assume and assign the Assumed Contracts to
the Stalking Horse Purchaser or, in the event the Stalking Horse
Purchaser is not the Winning Bidder, then to the Winning Bidder, is
subject to the Court's approval and the closing of the Sale.

The Sale Notice is approved.  Within three business days of the
entry of the Order, the Debtors will serve the Sale Notice upon all
the Sale Notice Parties.  They will post the Sale Notice, the
Assumption Notice, and the Bidding Procedures Order on the website
of their claims and noticing agent.

The Debtors will have until Oct. 5, 2020 at Noon (ET) to file and
serve a reply to any objection filed in connection with the Sale,
including any Sale Objection or Contract Objection.  

The Order will be effective immediately upon entry, and any stay of
orders provided for in Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) or 6006(d) or any
other provision of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules or the
Local Rules is expressly waived.  The Debtors are not subject to
any stay in the implementation, enforcement or realization of the
relief granted in the Order, and may, in its sole discretion and
without further delay, take any action and perform any act
authorized or approved under the Order.

A copy of the Agreement and the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y49rqu97 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Permian Holdco

Permian Holdco 1, Inc. and its affiliates are manufacturers of
above-ground storage tanks and processing equipment for the oil
and
natural gas exploration and production industry.

Permian Holdco 1, Inc. and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del., Case No.
20-11822) on July 19, 2020.  The petitions were signed by Chris
Maier, chief restructuring officer.  Hon. Mary F. Walrath presides
over the cases.

The Debtors have estimated assets of $0 to $50,000,000 and
estimated liabilities of $0 to $50,000,000.

M. Blake Cleary, Esq., Robert F. Poppiti, Jr., Esq., Joseph M.
Mulvihill, Esq., and Jordan E. Sazant, Esq. of Young Conaway
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP serve as counsel to the Debtors.  Seaport
Gordian Energy LLC serves as investment banker to the Debtors and
Epiq Corporate Restructuring LLC acts as notice and claims agent.



PETROTEQ ENERGY: Has $3.2M Comprehensive Loss for Feb. 29 Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Petroteq Energy Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss and comprehensive loss of $3,212,238 on
$68,509 of revenues for the three months ended Feb. 29, 2020,
compared to a net loss and comprehensive loss of $3,623,870 on
$21,248 of revenues for the three months ended Feb. 28, 2020.

At Feb. 29, 2020, the Company had total assets of $75,148,173,
total liabilities of $18,636,160, and $56,512,013 in total
shareholders' equity.

The Company disclosed that there is substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company said, "At February 29, 2020, we had not yet achieved
profitable operations, had accumulated losses of ($84,680,191)
since our inception and a working capital deficit of ($12,081,996),
and expect to incur further losses in the development of our
business, all of which casts substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern.  We have incurred net losses for the
past four years.  The opinion of our independent registered
accounting firm on our audited financial statements for the years
ended August 31, 2019 and 2018 draws attention to our notes to the
financial statements, which describes certain material
uncertainties regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our
ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain
the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our
liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come
due.  Management's plan to address our ability to continue as a
going concern includes (1) obtaining debt or equity funding from
private placement or institutional sources, (2) obtaining loans
from financial institutions, where possible, or (3) participating
in joint venture transactions with third parties.  Although
management believes that it will be able to obtain the necessary
funding to allow us to remain a going concern through the methods
discussed above, there can be no assurances that such methods will
prove successful.  The accompanying financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/gDfKnQ

Petroteq Energy Inc., through its subsidiaries, engages in the oil
sands mining and oil extraction operations in the United States. It
holds rights to mine, extract, and produce oil and associated
hydrocarbons and minerals from oil sands containing heavy oil and
bitumen under mineral leases covering approximately 2,541.76 acres
in the Asphalt Ridge area of Utah. The company also has operating
rights under five U.S. federal oil and gas leases covering
approximately 5,960 acres situated in Uintah, Wayne, and Garfield
counties, Utah. In addition, it is developing a blockchain-powered
supply chain management platform for the oil and gas industry. The
company was formerly known as MCW Energy Group Limited and changed
its name to Petroteq Energy Inc. in May 2017. Petroteq Energy Inc.
is based in Sherman Oaks, California.



PPV INC: Seeks Aug. 21 Extension of Plan Exclusivity Period
-----------------------------------------------------------
PPV, Inc. and Bravo Environmental NW, Inc. ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Oregon to extend through and including
August 21, 2020:

     1. the period within which the Debtors have the exclusive
right to file a Chapter 11 plan; and

     2. the deadline within which the Debtors must decide whether
to assume or reject all unexpired leases of non-residential real
property.

The Debtors said the extension will allow them to continue their
discussions with key creditors and potential buyers for PPV and/or
Bravo, and establish bidding procedures in order to achieve the
highest and best price for the Debtors; and finalize a letter of
intent to facilitate a Plan and Disclosure Statement. The extension
will also give the Debtors additional time to decide whether to
assume or reject non-residential real property leases.

The Debtors disclose that due to COVID-19, their discussions with
potential lenders or buyers have been delayed or postponed in light
of the state of the financial economy.  Nonetheless, the Debtors
have been approached with a framework for a possible sale
transaction that will facilitate a confirmable plan of
reorganization.  In addition, the Debtors have been in discussions
with key creditors about the status of such sale negotiations and
the possible treatment of creditors' claims in a plan of
reorganization.  However, much of this work and analysis will
depend on the terms of the sale transaction which will only be
clear after the expiration of the exclusivity period.  Both
conversations with the would-be potential buyer and key creditors
have continued; however, there is additional due diligence
necessary in order to finalize a letter of intent to facilitate a
Plan and Disclosure Statement.

                        About PPV, Inc.

PPV, Inc. -- https://www.ppvnw.com/ -- is a waste management
services provider in Portland, Oregon. The company offers
industrial cleaning, recycling, treatment, and technical waste
management services.

PPV, Inc. filed a petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D. Ore. Lead Case No. 19-34517) on Dec. 10, 2019. In the
petition signed by Joseph J. Thuney, president, the Debtor was
estimated to have between $1 million and $10 million in both assets
and liabilities.  Douglas R. Ricks, Esq. at Vanden Bos & Chapman,
LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.

Affiliate Bravo Environmental NW, Inc., also filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Ore. Case 19-34518) on Dec. 10, 2019.

The cases are jointly administered before the Honorable David W.
Hercher.



PROTEUS DIGITAL: Morris James Updates on Equity Security Holders
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Morris James LLP submitted an amended verified
statement to disclose an updated list of Ad Hoc Committee of Equity
Security Holders that it is representing in the Chapter 11 cases of
Proteus Digital Health, Inc.

As of Aug. 11, 2020, members of the Ad Hoc Committee and their
disclosable economic interests are:

Senior Preferred:

   Novartis Pharma AG Lichtstrasse
   35 CH-4056, Basel
   Switzerland

   * Series E Preferred 2,586,207 shares
     (Series E Preferred and Series F Preferred combined)
     $24,500,000

   Novartis Pharma AG Lichtstrasse
   35 CH-4056, Basel
   Switzerland

   * Series F Preferred 1,637,931 shares
     Total value at issue price (Series E Preferred and
     Series F Preferred combined) $24,500,000

   Timothy Robertson
   2719 Sequoia Way
   Belmont CA
   United States 94002

   * Series F Preferred 4,067 shares
     value at issue price $23,589

   Keymount Investments Limited
   4112-19 Jardine House
   Central, Hong Kong

   * Series G Preferred 3,805,175 shares
     value at original issue price $50,000,000

   Sensor International Investment Ltd
   Unit 2006-08, 20/F, Harbour Centre
   25 Harbour Road, Wan Chai
   Hong Kong

   * Series G Preferred 1,537,290 shares $20,199,991

Common Shares:

   Markus Christen
   425 Pinehill Road
   Hillsborough CA
   United States 94010

   * Common 350,000 shares

   Timothy Robertson
   2719 Sequoia Way
   Belmont CA
   United States 94002

   * Common 123,755 shares
   * Common 93,243 shares

Counsel for the Ad Hoc Committee of Preferred Equity Security
Holders can be reached at:

          MORRIS JAMES LLP
          Eric J. Monzo, Esq.
          Brya M. Keilson, Esq.
          500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500
          Wilmington, DE 19801
          Tel: (302) 888-6800
          Fax: (302) 571-1750
          E-mail: emonzo@morrisjames.com
                  bkeilson@morrisjames.com

             - and -

          Sandra E. Mayerson, Esq.
          David Hartheimer, Esq.
          Mayerson & Hartheimer, PLLC
          845 3rd Ave., 11th Floor
          New York, NY 10022
          Tel: (646) 778-4380
          E-mail: sandy@mhlaw-ny.com
                  david@mhlaw-ny.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/fbNxlY

                  About Proteus Digital Health

Proteus Digital Health, Inc., was founded in 2002 to research and
develop Digital Medicines.  It has developed and commercialized a
service offering called Proteus Discover, a Digital Medicines
solution.

Proteus Digital Health sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-11580) on June 15,
2020.  At the time of the filing, Debtor had estimated assets of
between $100 million and $500 million and liabilities of between
$50 million and $100 million.  

The Debtor tapped Goodwin Procter, LLP, as bankruptcy counsel;
Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, as Delaware and conflicts counsel;
SierraConstellation Partners, LLC, as financial advisor; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants, LLC, as notice and claims agent and
administrative advisor.


RAIN CARBON: Moody's Lowers CFR to B2, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Rain Carbon Inc.'s corporate
family rating to B2 from B1, probability of default rating to B2-PD
from B1-PD and the rating of the senior secured 2nd lien notes to
B3 from B2. At the same time, Moody's affirmed the Ba3 rating of
RCI's senior secured revolving facility and the Ba3 rating of the
senior secured Euro term facility of Rain Carbon GmbH, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of RCI. The outlook for the ratings is
stable.

"The ratings downgrade reflects the negative impact of the
coronavirus on many of RCI's end-markets, the expected
deterioration in the company's credit profile, the uncertainty over
certain growth projects as well as the timing and the path of the
earnings recovery", said Botir Sharipov, Vice President and lead
analyst for Rain Carbon Inc.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Rain Carbon Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B2-PD from B1-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B2 from B1

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to B3 (LGD4) from
B2 (LGD4)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Rain Carbon GmbH

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD2) from
(LGD3)

Issuer: Rain Carbon Inc.

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Affirmed Ba3 (LGD2) from
(LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Rain Carbon GmbH

Outlook, Changed to Stable from Negative

Issuer: Rain Carbon Inc.

Outlook, Changed to Stable from Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Rain Carbon Inc's B2 corporate family rating reflects its high
exposure to the aluminum industry and other cyclical sectors such
as automotive, steel, chemical and other industrial sectors.
Notwithstanding the anticipated gradual recovery following the
severe demand shock and supply chain disruptions caused by the
pandemic, the rating reflects the expectations of the continued
near-term weakness in key end markets.

The rating takes into account the delays in the commencement of
operations of the new Vertical-Shaft Calcination plant and ACP
plants that were expected to meaningfully contribute to 2020
earnings. The rating also considers the impact of the restrictions
placed by the Indian government on the imports of petroleum coke in
2018. The rating is supported by the company's adequate liquidity
position, diverse business profile that allows it to service
various end markets and geographic regions and its strong
relationships with key raw material suppliers and customers.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that RCI's
earnings will gradually improve from Q2 2020 levels and the company
will complete its strategic growth initiatives as planned. The
stable outlook also assumes that the leverage will sustain below
5.5x in the next 12-18 months and the company maintains its
adequate liquidity position.

As expected, RCI's performance improved materially in 2H19 and 1Q20
after the company worked through the higher-cost GPC inventory and
implemented cost reduction measures. In early 2020, RCI also
benefitted from the incremental demand displacing CPC volumes from
China. The resulting margin expansion and EBITDA growth reduced the
Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA to 4.7x as of March 31, 2020.

However, the rapid spread of the coronavirus outbreak,
deteriorating global economic outlook, low oil prices, and high
asset price volatility have created an unprecedented credit shock
across a range of sectors and regions where the company operates.
Moody's regards the coronavirus outbreak as a social risk under its
ESG framework, given the substantial implications for public health
and safety.

Its action reflects the impact on Rain Carbon of the deterioration
in credit quality it has triggered, given its exposure to aluminum,
automotive, chemical, steel and other sectors, as well as the
linkage between the prices of some of the company's carbon
products, intermediates and derivates and crude oil, the price of
which plummeted in the first half of the year.

Nationwide lockdowns, temporarily suspended calcination and energy
operations in India in late March - early April, overall demand
shock and lower YTD y-o-y primary aluminum production in Asia ex.
China have led to lower CPC and CTP sales volumes. Sharp fall in
aluminum prices and the resurgence of CPC exports from China in Q2
amid the recovery in the country's business activities have
pressured CPC prices.

While aluminum prices have recovered meaningfully since March-April
lows, high LME inventories amid still weak industrial demand will
likely temper the recovery in CPC/CTP volumes and prices. Although
utilization rates of the US oil refiners have improved from the
lows after oil prices cratered, narrow refinery margins and reduced
runs will continue to limit the availability of higher quality
low-sulfur GPC the company procures for calcining and blending.
This, in combination with the reduced availability of CTP as a
result of lower 1H20 global steel production excluding China, have
negatively impacted raw material costs.

Prices for some of the company's Carbon and Advanced Materials
products are indexed to oil and oil-related products and have
fallen sharply in the first half of the year. The revenues were
also affected by shutdowns of the automotive plants in Europe and
the US and reduced construction activities, partially offset by
strong seasonal demand for pavement sealer products and creosote
oil applications. With the exception of bouts of unexpected
volatility, as a converter of industrial carbon by-products with
diverse operations, RCI tends to benefit from a relative stability
in spreads between its product prices and raw material costs. This
was evidenced in Q2, when Moody's adjusted EBITDA margin was 16.5%,
only 50bps lower than in Q1.

While Moody's expects RCI's performance to improve in the second
half and in 2021 from the Q2 trough, the path and the timing of the
improvement are uncertain. The projected earnings growth will
depend on the pace of the global economic recovery and the
completion of the growth projects that have been delayed due to the
pandemic.

Moody's expects that RCI's debt protection metrics will weaken as
compared to 2019 with Moody's adjusted leverage increasing to
5.5-6x by the end of the year before falling to low 5x in 2021
based on its EBITDA forecast of about $250 million, buoyed by the
expected rebound in demand from key end markets and better product
pricing. Moody's also estimates that RCI will be moderately FCF
negative in 2H2020 but return to modestly positive FCF generation
in 2021 on the back of lower capex spending, higher sales volumes
from the new production facilities and the recovery in earnings.

RCI faces a number of ESG risks as a producer of carbon-based
products and a supplier of key input ingredients for the primary
aluminum industry. India's petcoke import restrictions were driven
by environmental concerns, specifically greenhouse gas emissions
associated with the use of petcoke as fuel. The company's existing
and proposed calciner facilities have scrubbing system that remove
at least 98% of SO2 emissions.

These restrictions have materially impacted the company's operating
and financial performance. RCI's Canadian subsidiary and other
unrelated companies were sued by several cities in Minnesota over
the cost of cleaning up the allegedly polluted local stormwater
ponds. The hearing to dismiss the motions filed by defendants was
held on September 20, 2019 and on December 20, 2019 the court has
dismissed all claims against RCI's Canadian subsidiary and the
other coal tar refiner defendants.

The company is also currently involved in an investigation
initiated by the Ontario Ministry of Environment Conservation and
Parks related to a product spill and the alleged improper disposal
of hazardous waste by the its distillation facility in Ontario,
Canada in 2019.

Rain Carbon Inc. has an adequate liquidity position as of June 30,
2020, supported by cash on hand of $160 million and combined $107
million of availability under the secured revolver maturing in 2023
and credit facilities available to fund working capital needs at
the company's Indian operations.

The Ba3 rating on the senior secured revolving credit facility and
the term loan reflects their priority in the capital structure with
respect to claim on collateral, ahead of the second lien notes due
2025, rated B3.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE OR DOWNGRADE OF THE RATINGS

An upgrade of RCI's ratings could be considered if Debt/EBITDA, as
adjusted, were expected to be sustained below 4.5x with
consistently positive free cash flows and good liquidity, and if
growth projects are completed successfully and operate as planned.
A downgrade would be considered if Debt/EBITDA, as adjusted by
Moody's, were expected to remain above 5.5x, (CFO -- Dividends)/
Debt below 10% or if liquidity deteriorated.

Rain Carbon Inc. is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rain
Industries Limited, a company incorporated in India. The company is
engaged in the business of manufacturing and sales of carbon
products and advanced materials, including calcined petroleum coke,
coal tar pitch, cogenerated energy, and other derivatives and
downstream products of the coal tar distillation process. The
company generated $1.4 billion in revenues during the LTM ended
June 30, 2020.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Steel Industry
published in September 2017.


REMORA PETROLEUM: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: Remora Petroleum, L.P.
             Building II 807 Las Cimas Pkwy, Suite 275
             Austin, Texas 78746

Business Description:     The Debtors engage in the exploration,
                          development, production and acquisition
                          of conventional oil and gas assets, with
                          a focus on assets that are heavy on
                          proved developed producing ("PDP")
                          reserves.  Since the Debtors formation
                          in 2011, they have acquired assets in a
                          variety of locations.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court:                    United States Bankruptcy Court
                          Southern District of Texas

Five affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

      Debtor                                      Case No.
      ------                                      --------
      Remora Petroleum, L.P. (Lead Debtor)        20-34037
      Remora Petroleum GP, LLC                    20-34038
      Remora Operating CA, LLC                    20-34039
      Remora Operating, LLC                       20-34040
      Remora Operating Louisiana, LLC             20-34041

Judge:                    Hon. David R. Jones

Debtors' Counsel:         Timothy A. ("Tad") Davidson II, Esq.
                          Joseph P. Rovira, Esq.
                          Catherine A. Diktaban, Esq.
                          HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
                          600 Travis Street, Suite 4200
                          Houston, Texas 77002
                          Tel: (713) 220-4200
                          Fax: (713) 220-4285
                          Email: taddavidson@huntonak.com
                                 josephrovira@huntonak.com
                                 cdiktaban@huntonak.com

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor:                  CONWAY MACKENZIE MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
                          LLC

Debtors'
Investment
Banker:                   SEAPORT GORDIAN ENEGY, LLC
Debtors'
Claims,
Noticing,
Solicitation &
Balloting Agent:          DONLIN, RECANO & COMPANY, INC.
                     https://www.donlinrecano.com/Clients/rp/Index

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petitions were signed by John T. Young, Jr., chief
restructuring officer.

A copy of Remora Petroleum's petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                    https://bit.ly/3ahQT7G

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Goldman Sachs                     Bank Debt-        $27,989,911
as Administrative Agent             Second Lien
2001 Ross Avenue
Ste 1800
Dallas, TX 75201
Matt Carter
Tel: 972-368-5324
Email: matt.carter@gs.com

2. Berkley Bonding Insurance         Litigation         $4,527,852
475 Steamboat Road
Greenwich, CT 06830
William R. Berkley
Chairman & President
Tel: 203-542-3800

3. Sidley Austin LLP                Professional          $713,787
1000 Louisiana St.                  Services Fees
Ste 6000
Houston, TX 77002
Kevin P. Lewis, Co-Managing
Partner, Houston
Tel: 713-495-4518
Email: klewis@sidley.com

4. Azure Midstream Energy, LLC          Trade             $357,500
23501 Cinco Ranch Blvd
Ste G250
Kathy, TX 77494
Kelley Anderson
Tel: 281-680-4300
Email: revenue@azuremidstream.com

5. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.          PPP Loan            $321,260
712 Main St.
Floor 13N
Houston, TX 77002
Vito Sannicandro
Tel: 877-576-2530
Email: vito.sannicandro@jpmorgan.com

6. Cobra Oil & Gas                 Joint Interest         $178,653
Corporation                           Billing
PO Box 8206
Wichita Falls, TX 76307
Sharon
Tel: 940-716-5100
Email: sharon@cobraogc.com

7. Pardus Oil & Gas                Joint Interest         $143,465
operating, LP                          Billing
3838 N Causeway Blvd
Ste 2800
Metairie, LA 70002
Patrick 'Bryan, CEO
Tel: 817-789-6712
Email: vnewland@pardusog.com

8. Vendera Management III, LLC       WI Revenue            $51,959
2626 Cole Ave
Ste 750
Dallas, TX 75204
Collins S. Lensing, COO &
General Counsel
Tel: 469-248-3079
Fax: 469-248-3173

9. Proline Energy Resources, Inc.      Trade               $46,365
4645 Sweetwater Blvd
Ste 500
Sugar Land TX 77479
Peter Oyewole, President
Tel: 832-886-4420
Fax: 832-886-4257

10. Peri Petroleum LLC              WI Revenue             $21,570
PO Box 20134
Sugar Land TX 77496
Peter Oyewole, President
Tel: 832-886-4420
Fax: 832-886-4257

11. Vendera Resources III, LP       WI Revenue             $18,063
2626 Cole Ave
Ste 750
Dallas, TX 75204
Collin S. Lensing, COO &
General Counsel
Tel: 469-248-3079
Fax: 469-248-3173

12. XOG Operating LLC             Joint Interest           $15,985
PO Box 352                           Billing
Midland, TX 79701
Randall Capps, Member
Tel: 432-683-3171
Fax: 432-683-3152

13. Charles Schusterman            WI Revenue              $11,828
Enterprises
PO Box 699
Tulsa OK 74101-0699
Tel: (202) 289-7000

14. Templar Energy LLC             WI Revenue              $10,344
LE Norman Operating LLC
4700 Gaillardia Pkwy Ste 200
Oklahoma City, OK 73142-1839
Brian A. Simmons, CEO
Tel: 405-548-1200

15. BP America Production Company  WI Revenue              $10,182
PO Box 848155
Dallas TX 75284-8155
Lucia Sporleder
Tel: 281-366-7584
Email: sporleder.lucia@bp.com

16. Las Campanas Partners, Ltd      Royalty                 $9,818
1510 Terrell St
Cuero TX 77954-5001
William T. Bell
Tel: 361-27-56460

17. James F. Welder                 Royalty                 $9,762
Royalty Partnership
PO Box 1159
Victoria TX 77902

18. Dorchester Resources          WI Revenue                $8,843
PO Box 18879
Oklahoma City OK 73154-8879
Alison Cox, Vice President
Tel: 405-418-8020
Fax: 888-376-2991

19. Range Resources Corporation Joint Interest              $7,245
Dept 8054                          Billing
PO Box 650002
Dallas TX 75265-0002
Zoe Serrano
Tel: 972-354-8163

20. PDC Energy Inc.             Joint Interest              $6,798
1775 Sherman St                    Billing
Ste 3000
Denver CO 80203
Becky Drain
Tel: 304-808-6368

21. State of Texas                 Royalty                  $6,721
G L O
563 Tucker Ave
Jefferson LA 70121

22. TLW Investments LLC          WI Revenue                 $6,687
1001 Fannin
Ste 2020
Houston TX 77002
Thomas L. Carter, Chairman

23. Mary Jo Poulson Halbirt       Royalty                   $6,542
4132 Idlewild Dr
Fort Worth TX 76107
Kyle Knute Poulson POA
Tel: 713-789-2131

24. Sarita Energy Resources     WI Revenue                  $6,395
PO Box 273127
Houston TX 77277-3127
Charles E. Nelson
Founder & Managing Member
Tel: 713-224-1681
Fax: 713-224-1683

25. Table Rock Partners, LLC                                $6,235
3026 Mockingbird Ln
Ste 270
Dallas TX 75205
Peter Luchetti, Managing Partner
Tel: 254-284-0689
Email: peter@tablerockpartners.com

26. The Anne G. Locascio             Royalty                $4,707
Living Trust
150 Forest Ave Unit
Unit 1009
Oak Park IL 60301
Anne Locascio and
Lawrence Locascio Jr. Cotste

27. Stolhandske Family Part Ltd      Royalty                $4,620
518 Mirepoix
San Antonio TX 78232-1950
Matt Stolhandske
Tel: 210-341-4747

28. Shoreline Southeast LLC           Trade                 $4,167
400 E Kaliste Saloom
Ste 2600
Lafayette La 70508
Daniel P. Hurley, Chairman & CEO

29. Carl E Gungoll               Joint Interest             $4,139
Exploration LLC                     Billing
Santa Fe North Building
6 NE 63rd Ste 300
PO Box 18466
Oklahoma City OK 73154
Martha West
Tel: 405-286-6545

30. Adolfo Aldo Uribe, Jr.          Royalty                 $4,046
1715 E Lyon St
Laredo TX 78043


RILEY DRIVE: City Center Buying Resto Bar Assets for $25K
---------------------------------------------------------
Riley Drive Entertainment XV, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Kansas to authorize the sale of
restaurant-related assets necessary for its restaurant and sports
bar business operations to City Center Pub, LLC for $25,000.

The Debtor's business consists of the ownership and operation of a
restaurant and sports bar called Saints Pub + Patio in Lenexa,
Kansas.  The Debtor owns the Assets necessary for the business
operations.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge and belief, the Assets are
encumbered by a senior lien in favor of OakStar Bank.  The Lender
filed a proof of claim (Claim No. 12) in this proceeding for an
amount in excess of $2.9 million, a minimal sum of which was
asserted to be secured.

In the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic and the resulting quarantine
accompanied by a widespread shutdown of the business marketplace,
the restaurant and bar industry has been particularly devastated.
The Business was largely shut down for a period of eight weeks
recently during which time the Revenues precipitously declined.

The substantial impairment of the Business due to the pandemic has
created a recognizably insurmountable obstacle to reorganization.
Schedule D filed by Debtor at the outset of the case alone reveals
in excess of $3.5 million of debt to only two of the Debtor's
several creditors.  Given its financial circumstances, the Debtor
believes that it no longer retains any realistic prospects to
propose a feasible and confirmable plan to repay creditors.

The Proposed Buyer expressed an interest in the acquisition of the
Assets.  The Debtor, the Lender, and the Proposed Buyer engaged in
negotiations for the sale and purchase of the Assets by the
Proposed Buyer.  The negotiations successfully culminated in their
Asset Purchase Agreement.  The Assets are described in Schedule 1
to the Agreement.   Pursuant to the Agreement, the Assets would be
sold to Proposed Buyer for the sum of $25,000 and, in consideration
of receipt of the sale proceeds, the Lender consents to the sale
free and clear of any and all liens and encumbrances of the Lender.


The Debtor submits that no equity exists in the Assets and that
their market value is likely less than the Purchase Price.  As
such, the proposed sale of the Assets for the Purchase Price
constitutes fair value (if not above-market value).  Given that the
Debtor can no longer effectuate a reorganization, the sale of the
Assets is appropriate as it will provide the maximum return to the
Lender under the circumstances.

As time is of the essence in approving the implementation of the
sale of the Assets and any unnecessary delay could impair the
transaction, the Debtor asks the Court to waive the applicable stay
imposed by Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yxgyl96r from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                  About Riley Drive Entertainment

Riley Drive Entertainment XV, Inc., which conducts business under
the name Saints Lenexa, is a hospitality and management company.
Founded by Marc Mundt and Scott Anderson in 2005, Riley Drive owns
and operates numerous restaurants and bars in the Des Moines and
Kansas City metro areas.

Riley Drive -- http://rileydrive.com/-- filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 19-41328) on Oct. 29, 2019 in
Topeka, Kansas.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was
estimated with assets between $100,000 to $500,000, and
liabilities
between $1 million to $10 million.  The petition was signed by
Scott Anderson, president.  Judge Dale L. Somers oversees the
case.
McDowell, Rice, Smith & Buchanan, PC is the Debtor's legal
counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


ROBERTS PROPERTY: BBVA USA Objects to Amended Plan & Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------
BBVA USA, an Alabama banking corporation, f/k/a Compass Bank,
objects to the approval of the Amended Disclosure Statement and
confirmation of the Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of
Debtor Roberts Property & Holdings, LLC.

BBVA claims that the Amended Disclosure Statement fails to provide
adequate information regarding how the Debtor plans to fund the
Amended Plan. The source of funding disclosed in the Amended
Disclosure Statement is inconsistent with the source of funding
provided for in the Amended Plan.

BBVA points out that the Amended Plan creates an adverse material
modification to BBVA’s treatment under the Original Plan, and
therefore must be resolicited.

It is BBVA's contention that Debtor has filed this case in bad
faith and purely for the purpose of delaying the scheduled
foreclosure sale.

BBVA asserts that the Debtor has no method for procuring an
impaired accepting class or for pass the absolute priority rule, as
Debtor intends for its equity to remain the same. Nor is any market
test offer for auctioning Debtor's equity.

BBVA further asserts that even if the Affiliates did provide funds
to the Debtor, the Debtor's failure to make any payment to BBVA
from the rental payments received by Facility Performance
demonstrates that there is a strong likelihood that the Debtor will
carry on the same practice and not make the payments as set forth
in the Amended Plan.

A full-text copy of BBVA's objection dated July 10, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y82z2xvj from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

Attorneys for BBVA:

          Michael A. Nardella, Esq.
          Paul N. Mascia, Esq.
          NARDELLA & NARDELLA, PLLC
          135 W. Central Blvd., Suite 300
          Orlando, FL 32801
          Phone: (407) 966-2680
          E-mail: mnardella@nardellalaw.com
                  pmascia@nardellalaw.com service@nardellalaw.com

                 About Roberts Property & Holdings
  
Roberts Property & Holdings, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-03409) on
Sept. 9, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
assets of between $1,000,001 and $10 million and liabilities of the
same range.  The case is assigned to Judge Jerry A. Funk.  The
Debtor is represented by Richard A. Perry, Esq., at Richard A.
Perry P.A.


S&S CRAFTSMEN: Oct. 5 Auction of Substantially All Assets
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Caryl E. Delano of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida authorized S&S Craftsmen, Inc.'s bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all assets
to SSCI Holdings, LLC for $707,746, cash, subject to higher and
better offers.

The Debtor shall, promptly upon the entry of the Order, mail or
serve a copy of the Order, to all interested parties.

SSCI is approved as the "Stalking Horse Bidder” as set forth in
the Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of July 30,
2020.https://tinyurl.com/yxa697zu

On account of SSCI's time, expenses, fees, costs, trouble and lost
opportunity costs in respect of the transactions contemplated by
the Purchase Agreement, the Court approved the break-up fee for
SSCI in the amount of up to $50,000.  

By no later than Sept. 8, 2020, the Debtor will file with the
Court, and serve notice thereof on interested parties, the Sale
Motion, which Sale Motion will include an executed copy of the
Purchase Agreement, a draft proposed order, and ask the Court's
entry of the Sale Order, including approval of the Purchase
Agreement and of the Debtor's performance under the Purchase
Agreement consistent with the terms, conditions and dates set forth
in the Order.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Sept. 21, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (EDT)

     b. Initial Bid: An initial Bid with a cash purchase price only
for the Assets of at least $25,000 above (A) the $$707,746 purchase
price offered by the Purchaser in the Purchase Agreement, plus (B)
a break-up fee in the amount of $50,000, for a total initial
overbid of $825,000

     c. Deposit: $75,000 made payable to the Debtor's counsel,
Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP

     d. Auction: An auction will be held at the offices of Johnson,
Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP, 401 E. Jackson Street, Suite 3100,
Tampa, Florida 33602 (or at such other location designated by the
Debtor in Tampa, Florida), at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) on Oct. 5, 2020,
provided that Johnson, Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP will make
arrangements to allow Qualified Bidders to participate via video
conference.  All potential Qualified Bidders with representatives
who have full authority to participate in the Auction must be
present in person or by video conference at the Auction.  

     e. Bid Increments: $25,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Oct. 8, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Oct. 1, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (EDT)

                       About S&S Craftsmen

S&S Craftsmen, Inc., owns and operates a millwork shop in Tampa,
Florida, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
20-02321) on March 17, 2020. The petition was signed by John L.
Rosende, its director. At the time of the filing, the Debtor
disclosed estimated assets of $100,000 to $500,000 and estimated
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The Debtor tapped
Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns LLP as its counsel.


SABLE PERMIAN: Oct. 2 Auction of Substantially All Assets
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Marvin Isgur of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas authorized the bidding procedures proposed by
Sable Permian Resources, LLC and affiliates in connection with the
sale of substantially all assets or any portion of their assets
through one or more sales or pursuant to a term sheet for a plan of
reorganization.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Sept. 25, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (CT)

     b. Initial Bid: The initial Overbid, if any, will provide for
total consideration to the Debtors with an aggregate value that
exceeds the value of the consideration under the Starting Bid by an
incremental amount that is not less than the sum of (i) $2 million
some other amount that the Debtors, in their reasonable discretion
and in consultation with the Consultation Parties, determine is an
appropriate amount for Bids that seek to purchase only a portion of
the Assets; plus (ii) with respect to bids from parties other than
a Stalking Horse Bidder, the amount of the Bid Protections payable
to any Stalking Horse Bidders, if applicable.

     c. Deposit: Each Good Faith Deposit must equal (i) the amount
of 10% of the purchase price contained in the Modified PSA in the
case of a Sale Transaction, (ii) 10% of the cash consideration in
the case of a Restructuring Transaction, or (iii) such other amount
as the Debtors determine, in their discretion, but in each case in
no event less than $25 million.

     d. Auction: The Auction will take place on Oct. 2, 2020 at the
offices of the counsel for the Debtors, Latham & Watkins LLP, 811
Main Street, Suite 3700, Houston, TX 77002 or at such other place
(which may be by video) and time as the Debtors will notify all
Qualified Bidders, the Consultation Parties and all other parties
entitled to attend the Auction.  

     e. Bid Increments: Each successive Overbid will exceed the
then-existing Overbid by an incremental amount that is not less
than the Minimum Overbid Increment; provided, however, that
successive Overbids by a Stalking Horse Bidder need only exceed the
then-existing Overbid, less the amount of the Bid Protections
payable to such Stalking Horse Bidder (if applicable), by $2
million or some other amount that the Debtors, in their reasonable
discretion and in consultation with the Consultation Parties,
determine is an appropriate amount for Bids that seek to purchase
only a portion of the Assets.  

     f. Sale Hearing: Oct. 13, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. (CT)

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Oct. 10, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. (CT)

     h. Tghe RBL Lenders under the prepetition secured revolving
credit facility between Sable Land Co., LLC and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, and the DIP Lenders under the
DIP credit facility between the Debtors and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. as the DIP Agent, and (2) any entity designated by the RBL
Lenders and/or the DIP Lenders which is owned and controlled at
least in part by the RBL Lenders and/or the DIP Lenders and formed
for the primary purpose of submitting a credit bid on behalf of the
RBL Lenders and/or the DIP Lenders that have a valid and perfected
lien on applicable assets of the Debtors' estates and the right and
power to credit bid claims secured by such liens will have the
right to credit bid all or any portion of their allowed secured
claimst the Auction.

The Debtors are authorized, but not directed, to select one or more
Bidders to act as Stalking Horse Bidder(s), and are authorized, but
not directed, to enter into a Stalking Horse Agreement with each
such Stalking Horse Bidder.

No later than the Stalking Horse Designation Deadline, if they
select a Stalking Horse Bidder, the Debtors will file with the
Court, serve on the Objection Recipients, and post on the case
website at https://cases.primeclerk.com/SPR a notice that contains
information about the Stalking Horse Bidder and the Stalking Horse
Bid, including any Bid Protections, and attaches the proposed
Stalking Horse Agreement.  The Stalking Horse Objection Deadline is
10 days after service of the Stalking Horse Selection Notice.

The form of Sale Notice is approved.  Within five business days
after the entry of the Order, the Debtors will serve the Sale
Notice and the Order upon Sale Notice Parties.

The form of Post-Auction Notice is approved.  As soon as
practicable after the Auction (if any) and in no event prior to the
Sale Objection Deadline, the Debtors will file on the Court and
serve on the Counterparties the Post-Auction Notice identifying any
Successful Bidder(s) and Backup Bidder(s).  

The Assumption and Assignment Procedures and the the Assumption
Notice are approved.  

As soon as practicable after the Auction and in no event before the
Sale Objection Deadline, the Debtors will file with the Court and
serve on the Counterparties the Post-Auction Notice identifying the
Successful Bidder(s) and Backup Bidder(s), and the Counterparties
will file any Adequate Assurance Objections by the Sale Objection
Deadline.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yxswhnmm from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                  About Sable Permian Resources

Sable Permian Resources, LLC and its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case
No. 20-33193) on June 25, 2020. At the time of the filing, Sable
Permian Resources disclosed assets of between $1 billion and $10
billion and liabilities of the same range. Judge Marvin Isgur
oversees the cases.  

The Debtors tapped Latham & Watkins, LLP and Hunton Andrews Kurth,
LLP as legal counsel; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC as
financial advisor; and Evercore Group, LLC as investment banker.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of unsecured
creditors on July 17, 2020.  The committee tapped Paul Hastings LLP
as its counsel; Miller Buckfire & Co., LLC and its affiliate,
Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., as investment banker; and Conway
MacKenzie, LLC as financial advisor.


SCOTT C. GRAY: $940K Sale of Santa Rosa Residential Property Okayed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Bruce C. Bessley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada authorized Scott C. Gray to enter into a
California Residential Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow
Instructions with Deepinder S. Sekhon and Jeanne M. Sekhon for the
sale of the real property commonly described as 4562 Badger Road,
Santa Rosa, Sonoma County, California for $940,000.

The first mortgage encumbering the Property in favor of Wells Fargo
Home Mortgage, evidenced by the Deed of Trust recorded on June 21,
2005, as Instrument No. 2005-086301, Official Records of Sonoma
County; the second mortgage in favor of the Lynn and Forest
Tardibuono Trust, evidenced by Deed of Trust recorded on Jan. 27,
2015, as Instrument No. 2015-005947, Official Records of Sonoma
County; outstanding real property taxes, if any; a commission of
$36,000 due to the Debtor's listing broker, W Real Estate, together
with all costs of sale normally borne by seller, will be paid
directly out of escrow upon closing.  The net proceeds of sale will
be all proceeds remaining after payment of the amounts set forth.

The Property is sold free and clear of all liens and/or claims
including, but not limited to, a judgment shown as a lien or claim
in favor of Steve Friedman, Debra Friedman and Lori Valenziano,
evidenced by an Abstract of Judgment recorded on Nov. 17, 2017, as
Instrument No. 2017-088985, Official Records of Sonoma County
(Exception 14 of the Preliminary Title Report for the Property, and
the Friedman Claim will attach to the Net Proceeds until the
Friedman Claim is determined by the Court or otherwise resolved.

Subject to further Order of the Court, any Net Proceeds remaining
after payment and resolution of the Friedman Claim will be held
subject to  determination of any and all amounts found to be due
and owing under the Judgment on Stipulation in favor of Josephine
Ross (deceased), her successors, assigns or any appointed
representative in any capacity, entered on Jan. 19, 2017, in the
Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma, Case No.
SCV-258977, entitled Josephine Ross, et al. v. Gayle Diane Gray, et
al.

The Net Proceeds will be distributed to the Debtor's attorney.  The
Debtor's attorney may apply $25,216 of the Net Proceeds to pay his
previously approved fees and costs by the Order Approving Amended
Second Interim Application by Attorney for Debtor to Approve
Compensation (William D. Cope) and the Order Approving Second
Amended First Interim Application by Attorney for Debtor to Approve
Compensation (William D. Cope).

The Debtor's attorney will hold the balance of the Net Proceeds in
trust pending final resolution of the Friedman Claim and the Ross
Claim.  No funds may be distributed from the Net Proceeds without
further order of the Court.  

A hearing on the Motion was held on Aug. 11, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

Scott C. Gray sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
18-50249) on March 13, 2018.  The Debtor tapped William D. Cope,
Esq., as counsel.


SEABRAS 1: Emerges from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
---------------------------------------------
At a hearing on June 30, 2020, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York confirmed the joint Plan of
Reorganization (the "Plan") of Seabras 1 USA, LLC and Seabras 1
Bermuda Ltd. (the "Companies"). On that same day, the Companies
consummated their financial restructuring process and emerged from
Chapter 11.

Under the terms of the approved Plan and attendant restructuring,
the total outstanding debt of the Companies has been reduced, the
debt maturity has been extended by approximately six years to
September 2028, the debt amortization has been re-shaped, and the
debt covenants have been revised, all in a way that provides a
solid basis for the continued growth of the business going
forward.

Consolidation

On June 30, 2020, Seabras Group, LLC and investment vehicles
advised by Partners Group redeemed and acquired all of the Class A
Units of Seabras Group, LLC previously held by a subsidiary of SNH
Networks, LLC ("SNH"), resulting in 100% equity ownership of
Seabras Group, LLC and its subsidiaries, including the Companies,
(the "Seabras Group") now being held by entities managed by
Partners Group on behalf of its clients.

Also on June 30, 2020, Seabras Bermuda acquired from SNH 100% of
Seaborn Management, Inc. ("Seaborn"), the third-party services
provider that manages the day-to-day operations of the Seabras-1
cable, effectively bringing all support services in-house under the
Seabras Group.

Management

Coincident with the consolidation and Chapter 11 emergence, Larry
Schwartz, former CEO of Seaborn, and Roger Kuebel, former CFO of
Seaborn, have left Seaborn and the Seabras Group.

Pete Hayes and Don Shassian, Partners Group-appointed Board
members, will serve as Interim CEO and Interim CFO, respectively,
of the Seabras Group. Andy Bax, the Chief Operating Officer ("COO")
of Seaborn, will remain in the same role.

                      About Seabras 1 USA

Seabras 1 Bermuda LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiary Seabras 1
USA
LLC own a fiber optic cable system between New York USA and Sao
Paulo, Brazil known as Seabras-1. Seabras-1 itself is fully
operated by Seaborn Networks, a developer-owner-operator of
submarine fiber optic cable systems.

Seabras 1 Bermuda and Seabras 1 USA filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-14006) on Dec. 22, 2019.  In the
petitions signed by CEO Larry W. Schwartz, the Debtors were
estimated to have $50 million to $100 million in assets and $100
million to $500 million in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP and Bracewell LLP as legal counsel; FTI
Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor; and Stretto as claims agent
and administrative advisor.


SOMERVILLE BREWING: Aug. 19-20 Online Auction of Personal Property
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized Somerville Brewing Co.'s public auction
sale of all of its personal property, and equipment, free and clear
of all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances.

The Public Auction will take place via on-line bidding at both of
the locations operated by the Debtor which are at (i) 15 Ward
Street, Somerville, Massachusetts ("Ward Street"); and (ii) 490
Foley Street, Somerville, Massachusetts ("Assembly Row") online
through the Internet Auction Mechanism.

The Public Auction will be conducted by the Debtor's auctioneer,
Paul E. Saperstein Co., Inc. at the Debtors locations as follows:
(i) Assembly Row on Aug. 19, 2020 at 11:00 a.m., and (ii) Ward
Street on Aug. 20, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.  

The sale of the Property will be free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests and encumbrances, with any such liens, claims,
interests and encumbrances in the Property attaching to the
proceeds.

The Property to be sold at the Public Auction is all of the
personal property of the Debtor at both of the respective
locations.  The equipment to be sold is identified on the Debtor's
Schedules at parts 7 and 8 filed Oct. 30, 2019.

The Debtor accepted an Offer for the purchase of certain assets
located at the Assembly Row location from Street Retail, Inc., the
landlord for the premises ("Stalking Horse Bidder") as follows:
"$85,000, plus a release of claims against the bankruptcy estate,
in exchange for all of the equipment and personal property located
at the Assembly Row premises when our client inspected the same on
May 19, 2020, plus a release of any claims the estate may have
against Street Retail…Street Retail is not purchasing any of the
Debtor's rights in any leases or executory contract."  Specifically
excluded from the Offer to purchase from the Stalking Horse Bidder
are the leased equipment and executory contracts which are defined
in the Motion as the "Assembly Row Leased Equipment."

The Assembly Row Leased Equipment is as follows:

     a. M2 Lease Funds, LLC:  R5.5i TAS 7.5 HP Compressor, MA
Pedestals for Compressor, Restaurant equipment as stated on order
acknowledgement from Pioneer Sales Company, Weber Can Printer, 82
MEK US Power, Ink MEK Black, 5 Bottles/Case. Makeup, MED, 5 Bottles
/Case, Bottle, Wash MEK, Beaker, Wash, Photocell, Laser Kit, Stand,
Stainless Steel Weber, Mount, Printhead Floor as stated on invoice
from Weber Labels & Labeling Systems, WGC-250 Canning System,
Depal-Pneu Assist DEPAL-PA, Brewery Chiller and Pilot Pro Electric
Base and Wild Goose Can Depaletizer.  

     b. Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc.: (3) 5bbl Brite Tank, (3)
3.5bbl Brite, (3) 3.5 Fermenter, Gillette Restaurant Equipment and

1 Norlake 8' x 10' x 7.7' tall walk in cooler w/indoor remote left
hand hinged door compressor.

At the Public Auction, all interested parties will be entitled to
bid on the equipment and personal property located at the Assembly
Row premises including but not limited to the assets which are the
subject of the stalking horse bid and the Debtor's rights in the
Assembly Row Leased Equipment as defined in the Motion to Sell with
all other terms and conditions, except as to price, will be
unchanged.

Upon conclusion of the Public Auction sale and prior to the close
of the on-line bidding, the Stalking Horse Bidder will be entitled
to increase the amount of its Stalking Horse Bid of $85,000 to not
less than 5% in excess of the highest bid received and to increase
the amount of the bid for the entirety of the assets which are the
Assembly Row Leased Equipment.

The Debtor will sell the assets which are the subject of the
Stalking Horse Bid and the assets which are the subject of any
leases or executory contracts in effect in separate sale lots with
all liens, claims and encumbrances attaching to the sale proceeds
of the respective  assets as sold, in the order of their priority.


Multiple creditors have asserted claims which are secured by all
asset blanket security interests in the Property and alleged
entitlement to proceeds in the following order of priority: (i)
First, Cambridge Trust Co. ("CTC"), (ii) Second, Massachusetts
Growth Capital Corp. ("MGCC"); (iii) Third, Federal Realty
Investment Trust ("FRIT"), (iv) Fourth, On Deck Capital Inc., (v)
Fifth, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Unemployment
Assistance ("DUA"), and (vi) Sixth, American Express National Bank
("AMX").

Multiple creditors assert a security interest on, or other property
interests in certain discretely identified Property subject to the
Motion and are defined as the "Discrete Collateral," sspecifically:


      a. Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc. pursuant to an equipment
lease agreement for the equipment described as (3) 5bbl Brite Tank,
(3) 3.5bbl Brite, (3) 3.5 Fermenter, Gillette Restaurant Equipment
and 1 Norlake 8' x 10' x 7.7' tall walk in coole r w/indoor remote

left hand hinged door compressor.

      b. Crestmark Vendor Finance, a division of MetaBank pursuant
to an equipment finance agreement and security interest on the
Franke Beer Kegs.  

      c. Corporation Service Company as Representative of Ascentium
pursuant to a UCC-1 financing agreement secured by the Grace
Material Mezzanine, 2 office platforms, 1 tank platform, the 55
Gallon Glycol Drum and Refractometer; and a Wild Goose WGC-250
canning line (4 Auto Fill Heads), Auto Lid Drop, Auto Steamer, WGC
Rinse Tunnel/Air Nozzle, Inlet Pressure/Temperature Monitoring with
Multiport Liquid Infeed Manifold.

      d. M2 Lease Funds, LLC pursuant to equipment leases which are
described as follows: (i) Lease dated Nov. 17, 2016: R5.5i TAS 7.5
HP Compressor, MA Pedestals for Compressor, Restaurant equipment as
stated on order acknowledgement from Pioneer Sales Company, Weber
Can Printer, 82 MEK US Power, Ink MEK Black, 5 Bottles/Case.
Makeup, MED, 5 Bottles /Case, Bottle, Wash MEK, Beaker, Wash,
Photocell, Laser Kit, Stand, Stainless Steel Weber, Mount,
Printhead Floor as stated on invoice from Weber Labels & Labeling
Systems, WGC-250 Canning System, Depal-Pneu Assist DEPAL-PA.  (ii)
Lease dated April 4, 2017: Brewery Chiller and Pilot Pro Electric
Base, Wild Goose Can Depaletizer.  

CTC and MGCC have consented to the sale of the Property on the
terms set forth in the Motion and agree that to the extent any
valid, perfected liens, claims, interests or encumbrances existed
as to the personalty of the Debtor on the Petition Date, those
liens, claims, interests and encumbrances will attach to the sale
proceeds.

Any monies that may be due and owing regarding any such liens will
not be the responsibility of the successful purchaser.

In the event that Street Retail, Inc. is the successful bidder on
the assets subject to the Stalking Horse Bid, Street Retail, Inc.
will release its claims against the Debtor and will receive a
release of any claims the estate may have against Street Retail.  

Three weeks following the removal of the assets upon completion of
the auction, the lease with Street Retail for the Assembly Row
location will be rejected and Street Retail will have possession of
the Assembly Row premises.

The value of the secured claims asserted against the Discrete
Collateral will be determined pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 506(a)
based upon the sale price obtained for each item of the Discrete
Collateral which will be sold in discrete and separate lots.

The Debtor will sell at the Public Auction the Franke beer kegs.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Order, Crestmark Vendor
Finance, a division of MetaBank will be permitted to credit bid its
indebtedness to acquire its collateral (consisting of Franke beer
kegs) at the Public Auction, however, in the event that Crestmark
credit bids at the auction sale, and acquires its collateral,
Crestmark will pay to the Debtor its proportionate share of any
fees and expenses incurred by the Auctioneer in conducting the
auction process and will remove the kegs in accordance with the
auction procedures established by the Auctioneer.

All proceeds from the sale of the Property, including the proceeds
from the sale of the Discrete Collateral will be held in escrow by
Counsel to the Debtor in the Parker & Lipton IOLTA account until
further order of the Bankruptcy Court.

Within 10 business days of receipt of the report from the
Auctioneer on the outcome of the Auction and the invoice from the
Auctioneer, the Debtor will submit a Report of Auction Outcome and
a Motion to Approve the Proposed Distribution of Sale Proceeds and
an Application for Compensation on behalf of the Auctioneer.  The
amount of the Auctioneer’s compensation and payment of expenses
will be in accordance with MLBR 6004-1 and as set forth in the
Motion to Sell.

The following are the procedures in connection with the Public
Auction of the Property:

     a. The Property will be transferred on an "as is, where is"
basis, without any representation or warranty of any kind by the
Debtor or the Auctioneer.

     b. The Property will be sold free and clear of any liens,
claims, encumbrances and interests, with such liens, claims,
encumbrances and interests, if any, attaching to the proceeds of
such sale.

     c. The successful bidder for any of the Property being sold
(including any party asserting a security interest in the Property)
will tender to the Debtor a deposit on the day of the auction equal
to 25% of its bid for the purchased Property.  

     d. There will be no credit bidding permitted due to the
potential for multiple claims asserted as to certain of the
Property, except as to the claims of  Crestmark.

     e. A successful bidder will pay the balance of the purchase
price by wire transfer or endorsed bank or certified check to the
Auctioneer in accordance with the terms announced at the Public
Auction, and in all events prior to the removal of any purchased
Property.

     f. The Stalking Horse Bidder will be entitled to the
opportunity to advance an overbid at the conclusion of the auction
before the bidding closes for the entirety of the assets located at
Assembly Row, including the sums bid for the Assembly Row Leased
Equipment, so long as the minimum increase is not less than 5% of
the highest offer(s) received.

     g. The Auctioneer will offer for sale in separate lots the
Discrete Collateral.

     h. The terms for the removal of the Property by the successful
bidder will be announced at the auction.  The successful bidder
must comply with the announced terms for removal or will forfeit
the deposit and the right to purchase the Property.

     i. To the extent that the Debtor does not consummate a sale to
highest bidder for any Property for any reason, the Debtor, in its
discretion, may sell such Property to the next highest bidder for
the Property that will successfully tender the required deposit to
the Debtor within three business days of written notice of default
of the previous highest bidder without further Court order.

     j. The Debtor may, at or before the sale, impose such other
and additional terms and conditions as they determine to be in the
best interests of the Debtor and its estate, creditors, and other
parties in interest.

     k. Additional terms may be announced by the Auctioneer at the
time of the sale.

Absent opposition to the Motion to Disburse and upon entry of a
final Order approved by the Court setting forth payment to the
respective parties asserting claims on the proceeds from the sale
of the Property including the Discrete Collateral, the proceeds
from the sale, net of the proportionate share of the Auctioneer’s
fees and expenses will be distributed as set forth in the Order
approving the Motion to Disburse.

In the event of dispute in some, but not all of the sale proceeds,
the Debtor will disburse those sums which are not disputed and as
authorized by the Motion to Disburse within five business days
following entry of a final order on the Motion to Disburse as to
the payment of undisputed sale proceeds.  The Debtor will hold the
disputed sums in the Parker & Lipton IOLTA account pending a
determination of a Complaint for Interpleader and Declaratory
Relief if required.  The Complaint will be filed within 10 business
days following entry of a final Order in connection with the Motion
to Disburse or such further Order of the Court.  

Within five business days following entry of a final order and
determination of any Complaint as to the claimant(s) entitled to
payment from the proceeds realized from the sale of the Property
the sale proceeds will be distributed.

Within 10 business days following distribution, a Report of the
Distribution will be filed with the Court.

Except as expressly set forth, nothing in the Order will be deemed
to impair or prejudice the rights and remedies of creditors to
assert the right to their claims in the proceeds by a determination
on the Motion to Disburse or the Complaint for Interpleader or
under the Further Order or applicable law.  

                About Somerville Brewing Company

Somerville Brewing Company, a/k/a Slumbrew, d/b/a American Fresh
Brewhouse, produces a wide variety of traditional and experimental
Slumbrew brand beer styles.

Somerville Brewing Company filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-13300) on Sept. 27, 2019 in Boston,
Massachusetts.  In the petition signed by Jeffrey Leiter, the
Debtor's president and treasurer, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets between $1 million to $10 million and liabilities within the
same range as of the bankruptcy filing. The Hon. Frank J. Bailey is
the case judge. Parker & Lipton is the Debtor's counsel.



SOMERVILLE BREWING: Online Auction of Personal Property Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized Somerville Brewing Co.'s public auction
sale of all of its personal property, and equipment, free and clear
of all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances.

A telephonic hearing on the Motion was held on Aug. 11, 2020.  

The Public Auction will take place via on-line bidding due to the
current limitations on physical distancing and related restrictions
at both of the locations operated by the Debtor which are at 15
Ward Street, Somerville, Massachusetts, and 490 Foley Street,
Somerville, Massachusetts ("Assembly Row") and online through the
Internet Auction Mechanism as more thoroughly described in the
Motion of Debtor for Authority to Employ Auctioneer to Conduct
Public Auction of Personalty Assets, which Motion was approved on
July 7, 2020.

The Public Auction will be conducted by the Debtor's auctioneer,
Paul E. Saperstein Co., Inc. as follows: Assembly Row on Aug. 19,
2020 at 11:00 a.m. and Ward Street on Aug. 20, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.

The Debtor will submit a proposed order by 4:30 p.m. on Aug. 13,
2020.

                About Somerville Brewing Company

Somerville Brewing Company, a/k/a Slumbrew, d/b/a American Fresh
Brewhouse, produces a wide variety of traditional and experimental
Slumbrew brand beer styles.

Somerville Brewing Company filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 19-13300) on Sept. 27, 2019 in Boston,
Massachusetts.  In the petition signed by Jeffrey Leiter, the
Debtor's president and treasurer, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets between $1 million to $10 million and liabilities within
the
same range as of the bankruptcy filing.  The Hon. Frank J. Bailey
is the case judge.  Parker & Lipton is the Debtor's counsel.


STEIN MART: Files Voluntary Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Petitions
-----------------------------------------------------------
Stein Mart, Inc. on Aug. 12, 2020, disclosed that it and its
subsidiaries have filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida – Jacksonville Division.
The Company has filed customary motions with the Bankruptcy Court
that will authorize, upon Bankruptcy Court approval, the Company's
ability to maintain operations in the ordinary course of business,
including, among other things, the payment of employee wages and
benefits without interruption, payment of suppliers and vendors in
the normal course of business, and the use of cash collateral.
These motions are typical in the Chapter 11 process and the Company
anticipates that they will be approved shortly after the
commencement of its Chapter 11 case.

Details on the Company's Chapter 11 process and go-forward strategy
are as follows:

   * The Company expects to close a significant portion, if not
all, of its brick-and-mortar stores and, in connection therewith,
the Company has launched a store closing and liquidation process.
The Company, however, will continue to operate its business in the
ordinary course in the near term; and

   * The Company is evaluating any and all strategic alternatives,
including the potential sale of its eCommerce business and related
intellectual property.

Hunt Hawkins, Chief Executive Officer of Stein Mart, Inc., said,
"The combined effects of a challenging retail environment coupled
with the impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic have caused
significant financial distress on our business. The Company has
determined that the best strategy to maximize value will be a
liquidation of its assets pursuant to an organized going out of
business sale. The Company lacks sufficient liquidity to continue
operating in the ordinary course of business. I would like to thank
all of our employees for their dedication and support."

Additional details:

   * The Company's restructuring counsel is Foley & Lardner LLP,
its restructuring advisor is Clear Thinking Group LLC and its
investment banker is PJ SOLOMON.

   * Court filings and other documents related to the process are
available at https://cases.stretto.com/SteinMart.

                        About Stein Mart

Stein Mart, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMRT) -- http://www.SteinMart.com-- is a
national specialty omni off-price retailer offering designer and
name-brand fashion apparel, home décor, accessories and shoes at
everyday discount prices. Stein Mart provides real value that
customers love every day. The company operates 281 stores across 30
states.



SUNNY HILLS: Burns-Coffins Buying Walnut Creek Property for $600K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sunny Hills Aquatic Club asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California to authorize the sale of the real
property commonly known as 2129 Youngs Valley Road, Walnut Creek,
California, APN No. 187-011-019-2, to Jared Burns-Coffin and Cassie
Rose Burns-Coffin for $600,000.

The Debtor owns the Property, a residential lot comprised of an
approximately 1.9 acres (83,200 Sq. Ft.).  The Debtor operated a
community membership pool on the Property.

The Debtor's shareholders wish to dissolve the corporation, its
shareholders having no interest in continuing the swim club.
Therefore, the shareholders proceeded to sell the Property, with
the idea that they would pay all creditors in full, and distribute
any balance to the shareholders.  However, the shareholders had a
dispute with one of the former shareholders which resulted in a
judgment determining that the disputed member, Hadi Zeghuzi, had no
interest in the Property, but he was entitled to his pro rata share
of the distributions to shareholders.  The Judgment was recorded.

To the Debtor's dismay, the Debtor could not find a title company
willing to provide title insurance unless Zeghuzi signed a quit
claim deed.  He refused to do so.  Therefore, the bankruptcy case
was commenced so that the Debtor could obtain an order from the
Court directing that the Property be sold free and clear of the
Judgment, with any interest that the Judgement holders have
attaching to the proceeds for further distribution subject to the
Court's order.   

The secured creditor is owed approximately $200,000, plus accrued
interest, and the Debtor asks approval of the sale for $600,000.
The unsecured creditors are owed $7,855 (plus $10,000 owed to
Wendel Rosen), and administrative expenses will be approximately
$4,000 a month.  It is an excess case wherein creditors will be
paid in full, and shareholders will receive a distribution.  The
amount of the distribution to shareholders will be determined after
all expenses are known, including  capital gains taxes, if any,
have been paid.

The Property is purportedly encumbered by the following liens or
interests, as reflected in the preliminary title report:

     (a) A purported interest or lien asserted by Hadi Zeghuzi and
Swim Shac, LLC, evidenced by the recording of that certain Judgment
on Stipulation recorded Dec. 11, 2018, as Instrument No.
2018-198176 in the Official Records of Contra Costa County; and

     (b) A first deed of trust in the principal amount of $200,000
held by Pensco Trust Company LLC, fbo Albert Demartini Jr. PSP fbo
Cynthia DeMartini Custody Only Account and John P. Campagna dba
Campagna Realty Services, evidenced by that certain deed of trust
recorded Sept. 3, 2019, as Instrument No. 2019-0142883 in the
Official Records of Contra Costa County.  The Debtor intends to pay
this lien in full from the proceeds of the sale through escrow.

Before the commencement of the case, on April 26, 2019, the Debtor
entered into an Exclusive Vacant Land Listing Agreement, dated
April 28, 2019, with DirtBrokers, Inc., a licensed real estate
brokerage firm , as the real estate broker to market and sell the
Property; thereafter, the Debtor executed two modifications
extending the expiration of the listing agreement through Nov. 18,
2020.  The Debtor has filed an Application to Employ Real Estate
Broker for Debtor.  Commencing at the end of April 2019, the
Property was marketed extensively over one year.   

The Broker received, on behalf of the Debtor, a Commercial Property
Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions, as modified by
Addendum No. 1 (dated Feb. 20, 2020), and First Amendment To
Commercial Property Purchase Agreement (dated June 12, 2020),
wherein the Buyers offer to the purchase the Property for $700,000
which was later reduced to  $600,000 after the Purchaser did their
due diligence.  Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement,
the Purchasers have deposited $21,000 with First American Escrow.

Subject to Bankruptcy Court approval, the Debtor and the Purchasers
have agreed to extend the closing date to the earlier to occur the
earlier of (i) 14 days after Court approval, or (ii) Aug. 28, 2020.
The Secured Creditor will be paid through escrow, along with other
expenses of sale.

It is the Debtor's intention, to sell the Property, pay all
creditors in full through a plan or other Court order, and then
dissolve the Debtor. At the time of the dissolution, Zeghuzi will
be paid his pro rata share of the distribution, consistent with the
Judgment.

The Purchase Agreement is subject to Bankruptcy Court approval.
The Property to be sold on an "as is" basis and, other than those
representations reflected in the Purchase Agreement, the Debtor has
made no representations or warranties, directly or indirectly,
express or implied, with respect to the physical, legal, economic
or other condition or history of the Property.  The Debtor believes
the proposed sale is in the best interest of the estate and its
creditors.

The Debtor asks authorization and authority for it, and any escrow
agent upon the Debtor's written instruction, to make the following
disbursements on or after the closing of the sale as are required
by the Purchase Agreement or order of the Court approving the
Motion:  

     (a) payment of amounts owed to secured creditor Pensco as
evidenced by the Pensco Deed of Trust;

     (b) all delinquent real property taxes and outstanding
post-petition real property taxes pro-rated as of the closing with
respect to the real property included among the purchased assets;

     (c) Broker's commission as described in the Broker Application
and Order approving the same (to be entered prior to entry of the
Order approving the sale); and

     (d) all other ordinary and usual closing costs agreed to in
the Purchase Agreement.

     (e) The sum of approximately $6,850 to DeBolt Civil
Engineering to prepare a land survey as required by the Amendment
attached to the Purchase Agreement.

Finally, the Debtor asks that the Court enters an order waiving the
14-day stay provisions of Rule 6004(h) of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure.  It is in the best interests of the estate
that the sale be consummated as quickly as possible without any
stay pending appeal.  A delay in the closing of the sale will
increase carrying costs and may result in the loss of the sale,
which would in turn require a remarketing of the Property.  Notice
has afforded reasonable opportunity to present an opposition.  

The sale is in the best interest of the estate in that it is for
the highest and best amount that the Debtor could obtain, after
marketing the property for over a year.  The offer is all-cash with
minimal contingencies, and the Debtor believes that the sale is
likely to close as soon as practicable.

A copy of the Agreement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yba6a623 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                   About Sunny Hills Aquatic Club

Sunny Hills Aquatic Club sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (N.D. Cal. Case No. 20-41077) on June 25, 2020,
listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. Tracy
Green, Esq. at Wendel, Rosen, Black And Dean represents the Debtor
as counsel.



SUPPERTIME INC: Has Until Sept. 15 to File Reorganization Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mindy A. Mora of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida has entered an order within which the right of
Debtor Suppertime, Inc. to file a plan of reorganization is
extended through and including Sept. 15, 2020.

A copy of the order dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yb75b464 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

         Craig I. Kelley, Esquire
         Kelley, Fulton & Kaplan, P.L.
         1665 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd, Suite 1000
         West Palm Beach, FL 33401
         Tel: (561) 491-1200
         Fax: (561) 684-3773
         E-mail: craig@kelleylawoffice.com

                      About Suppertime Inc.

Suppertime, Inc., operates as a restaurant known as Hurricane Cafe,
which is located in Juno Beach, Florida.  Suppertime sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 19-25666) on Nov. 20, 2019.  The petition was signed
by G. Scott Philip, president.  At the time of the filing, Debtor
was estimated to have assets under $100,000 and less than $1
million in debts.  

The case has been reassigned to Judge Mindy A. Mora after Judge
Erik P. Kimball was removed from the case.

The Debtor is represented by Craig I. Kelley, Esq. at Kelley,
Fulton & Kaplan, P.L.


SUR LA TABLE: In Chapter 11 to Pursue Quick Sale
------------------------------------------------
Sur La Table, the leading retail destination since 1972 for those
passionate about cooking and entertaining, today announced that it
has filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New
Jersey to consummate a restructuring and going-concern sale of the
Company, subject to Court approval.

With the support of its lenders, Sur La Table has secured the
necessary debtor-in-possession financing to complete the Court
process.  The Company contemplates the sale of Sur La Table retail
stores after the rationalization of its national store footprint
and closure of certain stores to prosper in the current retail
environment and position the Company for a vibrant future. The
Company has entered into a stalking horse asset purchase term sheet
with affiliates of Fortress Investment Group.  Fortress is working
in partnership with STORY3 Capital Partners, who together bring
capital and deep consumer expertise which will empower the Company
to unlock significant growth opportunities.  Following the sale,
the Company will include its successful retail stores, popular
in-person and online cooking classes,and its thriving eCommerce
business.  Sur La Table believes that that it is exceptionally well
positioned to thrive in the post-COVID-19 world, as food, cooking
and in-home entertainment continue to capture increasing mindshare
of consumers, and as such, this strategy is in the best long-term
interests of its employees,customers, and vendors.

Jason Goldberger, CEO of Sur La Table commented: "This sale process
will result in a revitalized Sur La Table,positioned to thrive in a
post COVID-19 retail environment.  Sur La Table will have a balance
sheet and retail footprint optimized to position the Company for a
bright future that continues our nearly 50-year tradition of
offering high-quality cooking products and experiences to our
customers."  

As of July 4th,2020, 121 Sur La Table stores across the country
have safely reopened, in accordance with CDC, federal, state and
local guidelines.

The Company has filed customary motions with the Bankruptcy Court
that will permit, upon Court approval, Sur La Table's ability to
maintain operations in the ordinary course.  These motions are
typical in the Chapter 11 process and the Company anticipates that
they will be approved shortly after this voluntary filing of its
application for protection under the applicable statutes.

                        About Sur La Table

Sur La Table, Inc. -- https://www.surlatable.com/ -- is a privately
held retail company that sells kitchenware products, including
cookware, bakeware, kitchen tools, knives, small appliances, dining
and home products, coffee and tea, food, and outdoor cookware.

SLT Holdco, Inc. and affiliate, Sur La Table, Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Tex.
Lead Case No. 20-18368) on July 8, 2020.  The petition was signed
by Jason Goldberger, chief executive officer.

At the time of the filing, SLT Holdco was estimated to have assets
and liabilities of between $10 million to $50 million.  Sur La
Table was estimated to have assets and liabilities of between $100
million to $500 million.  

Michael D. Sirota, Esq., Warren A. Usatine, Esq., David M. Bass,
Esq., Jacob S. Frumkin, Esq. of Cole Schotz P.C., serve as counsel
to the Debtors.  SOLIC Capital is the Debtors' financial advisor
and investment banker.  A&G Realty Partners LLC acts as the
Debtors' real estate advisor.  Great American Group, LLC and Tiger
Capital are the Debtors' sales consultant.  Omni Agent Solutions is
the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.


TAILORED BRANDS: U.S. Trustee Appoints Creditors' Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Aug. 11, 2020, appointed a
committee to represent unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases
of Tailored Brands, Inc. and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     1. The Bank of NY Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
        601 Travis, 16th Floor
        Houston, TX 77002
        Attention: Dennis J. Roemlein
        713-483-6531
        dennis.roemlein@bnymellon.com

     2. Cristian Zuniga
        4716 W. Ave. L10
        Lancaster, CA 93536
        661-429-6978
        zuniga.a.cristian@gmail.com

     3. AT&T Services, Inc.
        One AT&T Way, Room 3A115
        Bedminster, NJ 07921
        Attention: Karen A. Cavagnaro
        980-532-1957
        km1426@att.com

     4. Brookfield Properties Retail, Inc.
        350 N. Orleans St., Suite 300
        Chicago, IL 60654
        Attention: Julie Minnick Bowden
        312-960-2707
        julie.bowden@brookfieldpropertiesretail.com

     5. Icon International, Inc.
        One East Weaver Street
        Greenwich, CT 06831
        Attention: Gary Perlman
        203-328-7926
        gperlman@ICON-INTL.com

     6. Productos Textiles S.A.
        Zona Libre INHDELVA,
        800 mts Carretera a
        La Jutosa, Choloma, Cortes, Honduras
        Attention: Jacobo Katten S
        +504-9978-5004
        jacobo.kattan@protexsa.hn

     7. Peerless Clothing International
        200 Industrial Park Road
        St. Albans, VT 05478
        Attention: Sharon Chapman
        514-593-9300
        sharonc@peerless-clothing.com
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                       About Tailored Brands

Tailored Brands, Inc., (NYSE: TLRD) is an omni-channel specialty
retailer of menswear, including suits, formalwear and a broad
selection of polished and business casual offerings.  It delivers
personalized products and services through its convenient network
of over 1,400 stores in the United States and Canada as well as its
branded e-commerce websites at http://www.menswearhouse.com/and
http://www.josbank.com. Its brands include Men's Wearhouse, Jos.
A. Bank, Moores Clothing for Men and K&G.

Tailored Brands reported a net loss of $82.28 million for the year
ended Feb. 1, 2020, compared to net earnings of $83.24 million for
the year ended Feb. 2, 2019.  As of Feb. 1, 2020, the Company had
$2.42 billion in total assets, $2.52 billion in total liabilities,
and a total shareholders' deficit of $98.31 million.

On Aug. 2, 2020, Tailored Brands and its subsidiaries sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 20-33900) on
Aug. 2, 2020.  As of July 4, 2020, Tailored Brands disclosed
$2,482,124,043 in total assets and $2,839,642,691 in total
liabilities.

The Hon. Marvin Isgur is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Jackson Walker L.L.P., Stikeman Elliot LLP and Mourant
Ozannes as co-bankruptcy counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial
advisor; Alixpartners, LLP as restructuring advisor; and A&G Realty
Partners, LLC as the real estate consultant and advisor.  Prime
Clerk LLC is the claims agent.


TARGET GROUP: Needs More Working Capital to Remain Going Concern
----------------------------------------------------------------
Target Group Inc. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net income of $2,805,024 on $30,000 of revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2020, compared to a net loss of
$1,139,758 on $0 of revenue for the same period in 2019.

At March 31, 2020, the Company had total assets of $15,117,624,
total liabilities of $9,302,856, and $5,814,768 in total
stockholders' equity.

Target Group said, "The Company has earned minimal revenue since
inception to date and has sustained operating losses during the
three months ended March 31, 2020.  The Company had working capital
deficit of US$4,844,676 and an accumulated deficit of US$16,657,600
as of March 31, 2020.  The Company's continuation as a going
concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash
flows from operations to meet its obligations and/or obtaining
additional financing from its members or other sources, as may be
required.

"The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements
have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a
going concern up-to at least 12 months from the balance sheet date;
however, the above condition raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to do so.  The unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of
liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to
continue as a going concern.

"In order to maintain its current level of operations, the Company
will require additional working capital from either cash flow from
operations or from the sale of its equity.  However, the Company
currently has no commitments from any third parties for the
purchase of its equity.  If the Company is unable to acquire
additional working capital, it will be required to significantly
reduce its current level of operations."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/gHKcio

Target Group Inc. cultivates, processes, and distributes curated
cannabis products for the adult-use medical and recreational
cannabis market in Canada. It also offers Wisp, a single-use
pre-measured pod and vaporizer system for consumers involved in
vaporizing natural herbs, including cannabis.  The company was
formerly known as Chess Supersite Corporation and changed its name
to Target Group Inc. in July 2018.  Target Group Inc. was founded
in 2013 and is based in Vaughan, Canada.



TBH19 LLC: Creditors to Get Paid from Asset Sale Proceeds
---------------------------------------------------------
Secured Creditor DBD Credit Funding LLC filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles Division, a Plan of Reorganization for debtor TBH19, LLC
dated July 14, 2020.

DBD Credit Funding LLC believes the Debtor filed for bankruptcy as
part of an ongoing effort to maintain control over its sole
asset—that certain piece of real property located at 1011 N.
Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90210 (the "Real
Property") along with all personal property owned by Debtor or
located on, used with, and/or appurtenant to the Real Property.

The debt load on the Property has become unsustainable.  The Debtor
has failed to provide financial statements or other information
that would indicate the existence of operating income, an equity
infusion or other cash sources necessary to satisfy the Debtor's
obligations.  The Debtor's creditors are unwilling to continue
offering concessions to the Debtor and the Property should be sold
and the proceeds distributed to creditors pursuant to the terms of
the Plan.

It is intended that both the transfer of the Property to the
Liquidating Trust by the Debtor, and the subsequent sale of the
Property by the Liquidating Trust, will be regarded as made
pursuant to a confirmed plan under Chapter 11, and consequently
that no state or local transfer, stamp or excise taxes should be
imposed on such transfers under Section 1146(a) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Based upon the appraisal from Ron Green as well as the marketing of
the Property conducted to date, the fair market value of all assets
equals approximately $90,000,000.  Based upon the proofs of claim
submitted to the court, total liabilities equal approximately
$311,119,211.

The Plan must provide that a non-consenting impaired claimant or
interest holder of a consenting class receive at least as much as
would be available had the Debtor filed a Chapter 7 petition
instead.  In a Chapter 7 case the general rule is that the Debtor's
assets are sold by a trustee.  Unsecured claims generally share in
the proceeds of sale only after secured creditors and
administrative claimants are paid. Certain unsecured claims get
paid before other unsecured claims do.  Unsecured claims with the
same priority share in proportion to the amount of their allowed
claim in relationship to the total amount of allowed claims.

Class #2a Nominal Unsecured Claims include “nominal” claims of
$1,000 or less, and any larger unsecured claims whose claimant
agreed to reduce its claim to this amount. Claimants are not
entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.  Claimants will be
paid the nominal amount on the Effective Date, or as soon as
practicable thereafter.  Estimated total payments are $0.

Class #2b General unsecured claims will be paid a pro rata share of
any amounts received in excess of the secured, administrative, and
priority claims pursuant to the sale.  Payments will begin on or
around the closing of a sale (date): December 31, 2020.

Under the Plan, the shareholder receive no distribution on account
of their shares and each interest is cancelled in its entirety.

The Plan provides for the liquidation of all, or substantially all,
of the property of the estate.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated July 14, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2u6lf7v from PacerMonitor at
no charge.

Attorney for DBD Credit:

          Samuel A. Newman
          Genevieve G. Weiner
          Eric Schwartz
          Waqas A. Akmal
          Kennison Lay
          SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
          555 West Fifth Street
          Los Angeles, CA 90013
          Telephone: 213.896.6000
          Facsimile: 213.896.6600
          E-mail: sam.newman@sidley.com
                  gweiner@sidley.com
                  eschwartz@sidley.com
                  wakmal@sidley.com
                  klay@sidley.com

                - and -

          Alexis Miller Buese
          SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
          1999 Avenue of the Stars, 17th Floor
          Los Angeles, CA 90067
          Telephone: 310.595.9500
          Facsimile: 310.595.9501
          E-mail: alexis.buese@sidley.com

                        About TBH19 LLC

TBH19, LLC owns a single-family residential property located at
1011 N. Beverly Hills, Calif., having an appraised value of $125
million.  The residence is considered one of the crowning
achievements of renowned architect Gordon Kaufmann and was built in
1927 for Milton Getz, executive director of the Union Bank & Trust
Company.  TBH19 is managed by Lenard M. Ross.

TBH19 sought for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
19-23823) on Nov. 24, 2019.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of
$125,042,955 and total liabilities of $75,126,312 as of the
bankruptcy filing.  Judge Vincent P. Zurzolo oversees the case.
The Law Offices of Robert M. Yaspan, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


TROIANO TRUCKING: Trustee Selling Homeland Assets for $2 Million
----------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Weiss, the duly appointed Chapter 11 Trustee of Troiano
Trucking, Inc. and Troiano Realty, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Massachusetts to authorize the sale of
assets to Homeland Group Realty, LLC or its nominees, pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, for $2
million, subject to overbid.

Trucking's assets include a processing line which takes the food
waste, converts it to a slurry, which is then forced through an
extruder to shape the pellets; the pellets are then run through a
dryer to produce the finished product.  The operations are
conducted pursuant to a Recycling, Composting or Conversion Permit
("RCC Permit") issued by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue.
In addition, Trucking has dumpsters, vehicles and miscellaneous
equipment.  Trucking currently has approximately 10 full time
employees, plus some part-time employees.   

The Debtors' primary secured lender is Avidia Bank, which was owed
approximately $5 million as of the petition date.  Avidia has a
first mortgage on Realty's property, and a blanket security
interest in Trucking's assets.  Two creditors, Financial Pacific
Leasing, Inc., Phoenix Feeds & Nutrition, Inc., and Paradigm
Equipment Financing, Inc., claim purchase money security interests
in specific pieces of equipment.  On information and belief, real
estate taxes are in the approximate amount of $50,000.

Since his appointment, the Trustee has been actively marketing the
Debtors' assets for sale to third parties.  While the Trustee did
not hire a business broker, approximately six parties expressed
interest in the Debtors' assets, executed non-disclosure
agreements, and received information regarding the Debtors' assets.
Several of those parties visited the Debtors' facility.

As a result of these efforts, on July 9, 2020, the Trustee has
entered into the APA with the Purchaser for the acquisition of the
Real Estate and most of Trucking's assets, and including assignment
of Trucking's rights in the RCC Permit.  In addition, as an
essential part of the sale, the Purchaser is also acquiring the
stock of Trucking's sole shareholder, Mark Troiano.  Mr. Troiano is
also in a Chapter 11 case before the Court [Docket No.
19-41607-CJP].  The Purchaser desires Mr. Troiano's stock interest
as ownership of Trucking, as holder of the Permit, will enable the
Purchaser to operate until it can transfer ownership of the Permit
to the new company. It is anticipated that Mr. Troiano will be
managing the operations for the Purchaser after the sale is
consummated.

Homeland Group is a limited liability company based in Holden,
Massachusetts.  In the event that the Purchaser is the successful
bidder, it will assign its rights to operating assets and real
estate to separate entities.

The salient terms of the APA are:

     a. Seller: Steven Weiss, Chapter 11 Trustee

     b. Buyer: Homeland Group Realty, LLC, or its nominees

     c. Acquired Assets: (i) Real estate at 109 Creeper Hill Road,
North Grafton, Massachusetts; (ii) All of Trucking's equipment and
inventory; (iii) All of Trucking's motor vehicles and dumpsters;
and (iv) All other assets of Trucking except the Excluded Assets

     d. Consideration: $2 million - (i) For real estate owned by
Realty - $1 million, and For assets of Trucking - $1 million

     e. Assumed Liabilities: Contract with the Massachusetts
Department of Corrections for waste removal

     f. Financing: Contingent on financing in the amount of $1
million

     g. Closing: Within 30 days of approval of renewal of the
Debtor's permit issued by the Massachusetts Department of
Environmental
Protection

     h. Reps and Warranties: Representations and warranties usual
and customary for transactions of this nature

     i. Deposit: $50,000

     j. Break Up Fee: $75,000 (allowance subject to court approval)


     k. Next Highest Bid: $2.1 million

     l. There is no broker associated with the sale.

The Trustee asks that the Acquired Assets be transferred to the
Successful Bidder(s) free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances, with such liens, claims and encumbrances to attach to
the net proceeds of the Sale.

The Trustee will cause the Motion and the Notice of Sale upon all
Notice Parties.  He  will also cause to be served the Sale Notice
only on all other known creditors.

Upon completion of the sale, the Trustee asks authority to make
disbursements as follows: (a) first, to regular and customary
closing costs, including deed stamps and recording costs; (b) to
real estate taxes and municipal charges to the Town of Grafton; (c)
to the United States Trustee for all quarterly fees due through the
date of the sale; (d) to the bankruptcy estates for their
respective “carve out” as described above; and (e) the balance
to Avidia Bank on its secured claims.
  
By the Motion, the Trustee asks the issuance and entry of an order
authorizing and approving the Sale, and the Trustee's consummation
of the transactions contemplated in the Agreement.

A copy of the APA is available at https://tinyurl.com/ybmlebzf from
PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Troiano Trucking

Troiano Trucking, Inc. -- http://www.troianotrucking.com/-- is a
privately held company in Grafton, Mass., in the waste hauling
business.  The company maintains a fleet of four trucks, which
allows it to service its customers with removal of bakery waste,
rubbish, demolition materials and recyclables.  It serves
construction companies, roofing companies, bakeries and individual
home owners.

Troiano Realty, LLC, is a real estate lessor whose principal
assets
are located at 109 Creeper Hill Road, North Grafton, Mass.  The
property is valued at $1.48 million based on tax valuation
assessment method.

Troiano Trucking and Troiano Realty sought protection under
Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Lead Case No. 19-40656)
on April 23, 2019.  At the time of the filing, Troiano Trucking
was
estimated to have assets and liabilities of between $1 million and
$10 million.  Troiano Realty disclosed $1,485,000 in assets and
$4,220,210 in liabilities.



TROIANO TRUCKING: Trustee Selling Homeland Assets for $2M
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher J. Panos of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts has entered a supplemental order
regarding the hearing on the proposed sale by Steven Weiss, the
duly appointed Chapter 11 Trustee of Troiano Trucking, Inc. and
Troiano Realty, LLC, of assets to Homeland Group Realty, LLC or its
nominees, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Asset
Purchase Agreement, for $2 million, subject to overbid.

Trucking's assets include a processing line which takes the food
waste, converts it to a slurry, which is then forced through an
extruder to shape the pellets; the pellets are then run through a
dryer to produce the finished product.  The operations are
conducted pursuant to a Recycling, Composting or Conversion Permit
("RCC Permit") issued by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue.
In addition, Trucking has dumpsters, vehicles and miscellaneous
equipment.  Trucking currently has approximately 10 full time
employees, plus some part-time employees.   

The Court has entered an order converting the hearing scheduled for
Aug. 13, 2020, at 3:00 p.m., including the hearing on the the
Trustee's Sale Motion, to a hearing by video, the Court enters the
supplemental order to clarify its expectation with respect to the
bids that have been submitted pursuant to the Notice of Sale.  

Any party who has submitted a bid in accordance with the Notice of
Sale must be prepared, at the commencement of the Hearing, to
confirm that they are prepared to sign an asset purchase agreement,
which provided that higher offers must be for cash, and on the same
terms and conditions as set forth in the Motion to Approve Sale and
the Agreement, other than the purchase price.

If the bidders are not prepared to sign the APA without alteration,
other than the sale price, they must file a redlined version of the
APA reflecting any changes with the Court by 12:00 p.m. on Aug. 13,
2020 and will be prepared to discuss any proposed revisions at the
outset of the Hearing.  

The Trustee will provide a copy of the Order to all bidders, along
with a copy of the APA in word format, forthwith.

A copy of the APA is available at https://tinyurl.com/ybmlebzf from
PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Troiano Trucking

Troiano Trucking, Inc. -- http://www.troianotrucking.com/-- is a
privately held company in Grafton, Mass., in the waste hauling
business.  The company maintains a fleet of four trucks, which
allows it to service its customers with removal of bakery waste,
rubbish, demolition materials and recyclables.  It serves
construction companies, roofing companies, bakeries and individual
home owners.

Troiano Realty, LLC, is a real estate lessor whose principal
assets
are located at 109 Creeper Hill Road, North Grafton, Mass.  The
property is valued at $1.48 million based on tax valuation
assessment method.

Troiano Trucking and Troiano Realty sought protection under
Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Lead Case No. 19-40656)
on April 23, 2019.  At the time of the filing, Troiano Trucking
was
estimated to have assets and liabilities of between $1 million and
$10 million.  Troiano Realty disclosed $1,485,000 in assets and
$4,220,210 in liabilities.



TRUE RELIGION: Asks Court to Extend Plan Exclusivity Thru Nov. 9
----------------------------------------------------------------
True Religion Apparel, Inc. and its affiliates ask the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to extend the
exclusive periods for the companies to file a chapter 11 plan by 90
days, through and including, November 9, 2020, and to solicit
acceptances thereof by 90 days, through and including January 8,
2021.

The court previously extended the Debtors' exclusive filing period
through, and exclusive solicitation period through August 11, 2020,
and October 13, 2020, respectively.

The Debtors have been operating under the protection of Chapter 11
for approximately 4 months, and made significant and material
progress in administering the Chapter 11 Cases.

The Debtors contend they have shown good faith in these Chapter 11
Cases, and together with their advisors have worked diligently to
administer this case as efficiently as possible to minimize
administrative expenses and maximize the recovery available to all
of the Debtor's stakeholders. In addition, the official committee
of unsecured creditors is informed, involved, and has been provided
with the necessary documents for various issues.

The Debtors' efforts have culminated with the filing of an Amended
Plan and Disclosure Statement. Thus, they need sufficient time to
solicit votes on the Plan to avoid chaos into the process.

On July 27, 2020, the Court entered an order approving the
explanatory Disclosure Statement and scheduled a hearing to confirm
the Plan for Sept. 8.

"Allowing the expiration of the Exclusive Periods at this critical
stage would serve only to interfere with the progress of the
Chapter 11 Cases and introduce chaos into the process," the Debtors
contend.

                  About True Religion Apparel

Founded in Los Angeles, Calif., in 2002, True Religion Apparel,
Inc. and its affiliates design, market, sell and distribute premium
fashion apparel centered on their core denim products using the
brand names "True Religion" and "True Religion Brand Jeans."  The
products are distributed through wholesale and retail channels and
through the website at http://www.truereligion.com/on a global
basis.  The companies had 87 retail stores and over 1,000 employees
as of April 13, 2020.

True Religion Apparel and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
20-10941) on April 13, 2020. At the time of the filing, the Debtors
estimated between $100 million and $500 million in both assets and
liabilities.

Judge Christopher S. Sontchi oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Cole Schotz P.C. as legal counsel; Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP as corporate counsel; Province, Inc. as
financial advisor; Retail Consulting Services, Inc. as real estate
advisor; and Stretto as claims and noticing agent. Richard Lynch of
HRC Advisory, LP, is the Debtors' interim chief financial officer.


The United States Trustee for Region 3 has appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors.



ULTRA PETROLEUM: Has $217.6M Net Loss for Quarter Ended March 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ultra Petroleum Corp. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $217,605,000 on $130,076,000 of total
operating revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2020,
compared to a net income of $40,674,000 on $271,461,000 of total
operating revenues for the same period in 2019.

At March 31, 2020, the Company had total assets of $1,500,658,000,
total liabilities of $2,561,854,000, and $1,061,196,000 in total
stockholders' deficit.

The Company said, "The significant risks and uncertainties related
to the Company's liquidity and the Chapter 11 Cases raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.  As such, the accompanying condensed consolidated
financial statements (unaudited) are prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going
concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.  If
the Company cannot continue as a going concern, adjustments to the
carrying values and classification of its assets and liabilities
and the reported amounts of income and expenses could be required
and could be material.

"The filing of the Chapter 11 Cases constitutes an event of default
under the Company's outstanding debt agreements, resulting in the
automatic and immediate acceleration of all of the Company's
outstanding debt.  The Company projects that it will not have
sufficient cash on hand or available liquidity to repay such debt.
These conditions and events raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

"As part of the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company submitted the Plan to
the Bankruptcy Court.  The Company's operations and its ability to
develop and execute its business plan are subject to a high degree
of risk and uncertainty associated with the Chapter 11 Cases.  The
outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases is subject to a high degree of
uncertainty and is dependent upon factors that are outside of the
Company's control, including actions of the Bankruptcy Court and
the Company's creditors.  There can be no assurance that the
Company will confirm and consummate the Plan as contemplated by the
RSA or complete another plan of reorganization with respect to the
Chapter 11 Cases.  As a result, the Company has concluded that
management's plans do not alleviate substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern absent a
successful restructuring.

"Furthermore, as noted in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, the
Company's independent registered public accounting firm included an
explanatory paragraph in its opinion of the audited consolidated
financial statement regarding substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.  As a result, the Company
was in default under each of the Credit Agreement and Term Loan
Agreement on April 14, 2020 when it delivered its financial
statements to the lenders under the Credit Agreement and the Term
Loan Agreement, respectively.

"Accordingly, the Company has classified all of its outstanding
debt as a current liability on its condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019."

A copy of the Form 10-Q is available at:

                       https://is.gd/J9GMYL

Ultra Petroleum Corp., an independent oil and gas company, engages
in the acquisition, exploration, development, operation, and
production of oil and natural gas properties. Its principal
business activities are developing its natural gas reserves in the
Green River Basin of southwest Wyoming—the Pinedale and Jonah
fields. The company was founded in 1979 and is headquartered in
Englewood, Colorado.



UNITED AIRLINES: Says Around 36,000 Workers Could Be Furloughed
---------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Granville and Mohammed Hadi, writing for the New York Times,
reports that the United Airlines said July 8, 2020, that it could
furlough as many as 36,000 workers, or nearly 40 percent of its
staff, starting Oct. 1 if travel remained weak and if enough
employees did not accept buyout and early retirement packages.

Airlines have been warning workers for months that they could start
making significant cuts once federal stimulus funds expire. United
received about a fifth of the $25 billion Congress authorized in
March to help airlines pay employees as long as the companies made
no significant cuts through Sept. 30.

The Oct. 1 furloughs would include about 15,000 flight attendants,
11,000 customer service and gate agents, 5,500 maintenance
employees, and 2,250 pilots, among others. Those numbers could be
smaller if ticket sales pick up significantly or if many thousands
of workers apply for reduced hours or voluntary leave before a
mid-July deadline United has set for buyouts and early retirement
packages, the airline said in a memo to its employees. United is
also cutting almost a third of management and administrative
employees.

"The United Airlines projected furlough numbers are a gut punch,
but they are also the most honest assessment we've seen on the
state of the industry," said Sara Nelson, president of the
Association of Flight Attendants union, which represents nearly
50,000 workers at 19 airlines, including United.

In a statement, Ms. Nelson called on Congress to extend the
stimulus funding "to avoid hundreds of thousands of layoffs from an
industry that normally drives economic activity."

Most workers will know if they are being furloughed by the end of
August. Most of those who are furloughed will be eligible to return
to their jobs when air travel picks up.

Air travel had started to rebound after falling about 96 percent in
April, but the recovery has been choppy and is expected to remain
uneven. On Tuesday, United announced that it was revising the
August schedule it announced only last week because bookings had
begun sliding again amid a surge in virus cases in the Sunbelt and
after Connecticut, New Jersey and New York said they would require
travelers from states with rising infection rates to quarantine
themselves for two weeks.

On Tuesday, about 642,000 people went through federal airport
security checkpoints, about a quarter of the foot traffic from the
same time last year.

Technology stocks led Wall Street higher on Wednesday, but trading
was unsteady as investors considered the spreading coronavirus
outbreak and new friction between the United States and China.

After swinging from gains to losses and back again, the S&P 500
rose less than 1 percent. The technology heavy Nasdaq composite
fared better, rising nearly 1.5 percent, as shares of companies
including Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook and Apple rallied. All four
of those stocks, and the broader Nasdaq composite, hit record highs
on Wednesday.

Technology stocks, favored by investors who see them as insulated
from the worst of the coronavirus pandemic, have rallied since late
June amid a surge of cases of the virus across the United States.
The companies have cash stockpiles that will protect them from any
downturn, and products that are in higher demand as the pandemic
keeps workers at home.

More broadly, stocks have been climbing recently even as the number
of coronavirus cases in the United States surge and governments
begin to reinstate restrictions on gatherings and other activity in
an effort to contain the virus. That's in part because of data
showing that the economy is rebounding from its lows earlier this
year.

But it also puts markets at risk of a sharp pullback if leaders
take more drastic action, or investors are confronted with evidence
of the toll the pandemic is taking on corporate profits.

Wall Street's advance on Wednesday stood in contrast to a drop in
global markets. Shares in Europe and Asia were mostly lower.

                      About United Airlines

Headquartered in the Willis Tower in Chicago, United Airlines
Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:UAL) owns and operates United Airlines,
Inc.

Before the Coronavirus pandemic, United Airlines and subsidiary
United Express -- http://www.united.com/-- operated 4,900 flights
a day to 362 airports across six continents.  In 2019, United and
United Express operated more than 1.7 million flights carrying more
than 162 million customers.  United has the world's most
comprehensive route network, including U.S. mainland hubs in
Chicago, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, New York/Newark, San
Francisco and Washington, D.C. United operated 791 mainline
aircraft and the airline's United Express partners operated 581
regional aircraft. United is a founding member of Star Alliance.

The air travel industry is suffering enormous financial losses as
the coronavirus pandemic has reduced travel.


UNITED STATES CELLULAR: S&P Rates New Senior Notes to 'BB'
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to United States Cellular Corp.'s proposed senior
notes (amount and maturity to be determined). The '3' recovery
rating indicated its expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded
estimate: 65%) recovery in the event of a payment default. U.S.
Cellular is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chicago-based diversified
telecommunications provider Telephone and Data Systems Inc. (TDS)

S&P expects the company to use the net proceeds from these notes to
refinance existing debt, purchase additional spectrum, and fund
capital expenditure.

"While TDS' adjusted debt to EBITDA is low at about 2x, we forecast
its leverage could rise above 3x over the next couple of years due
to higher levels of capital spending and the potential acquisition
of spectrum licenses in upcoming auctions. That said, the 'BB'
issuer-credit rating and stable outlook on the company remain
unchanged because we expect its leverage to remain comfortably
below our 4x downgrade threshold," S&P said.

For 2020, S&P expects U.S. Cellular's postpaid subscriber base to
continue to decline due to market share losses to the larger
incumbents that own nationwide networks. While the US wireless
industry should be relatively insulated from the effects of
COVID-19 and the related recession, S&P still believes that
industry-wide gross postpaid subscriber growth will slow. However,
this will be partly offset by lower churn as the store closures
stemming from the pandemic have hindered customers' ability to
switch carriers, although this trend will change throughout the
year as the economy reopens. Additionally, S&P expects the launch
of new 5G equipment, including a new model of the Apple iPhone in
the second half of the year, to lead to greater competition and
higher churn. Overall, U.S. Cellular's second-quarter results held
up well as it offset lower postpaid gross subscriber additions with
reduced postpaid phone churn, which contributed to net postpaid
subscriber growth. Therefore, the company's total service revenue
was basically flat from the year-ago period. For the year, S&P
expects the wireless service revenue to decline by 1%-3% due to
lower average revenue per user (ARPU) and depressed roaming revenue
because of the coronavirus pandemic.


UNITI GROUP: Reports $588.2 Million Net Loss for Second Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Uniti Group Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss
attributable to common shareholders of $588.17 million on $266.82
million of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2020,
compared to net income attributable to common shareholders of
$38.25 million on $264.41 million of total revenues for the three
months ended June 30, 2019.

For the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company reported a net
loss attributable to common shareholders of $667.22 million on
$532.98 million of total revenues compared to net income
attributable to common shareholders of $39.26 million on $525.44
million of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2019.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $4.82 billion in total assets,
$7.03 billion in total liabilities, and a total shareholders'
deficit of $2.22 billion.

"We continued to see strong operational performance across all of
our businesses during the second quarter as the effects from
COVID-19 remain minimal.  At Uniti Fiber, we had one of our highest
levels of install activity during the quarter, as demand for dark
fiber, small cells, and non-wireless services remains robust.  We
continue to see positive momentum in our leasing business, and will
expand our leasable fiber to third parties by 90% as part of the
Windstream settlement," commented Kenny Gunderman, president and
chief executive officer.

Mr. Gunderman continued, "We remain focused on driving high margin,
low churn recurring revenue in both our Uniti Fiber and Uniti
Leasing businesses, while de-emphasizing non-core businesses that
do not fit our overall strategy.  As a result of these initiatives,
97% of our revenue is recurring, with company-wide monthly churn
remaining below 0.3%, resulting in highly predictable and
defensible cash flows."

      Windstream Achieves Milestones Towards Emergence

On June 25, 2020, Windstream's Chapter 11 plan of reorganization
was approved by the Honorable Robert D. Drain of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.  The
effectiveness of the plan remains subject to certain conditions
precedent, including the consummation of the settlement between
Uniti and Windstream and the parties obtaining certain regulatory
approvals.

On July 29, 2020, Uniti received the true lease and REIT opinions
in connection with its settlement with Windstream.  The receipt of
the opinions satisfy the corresponding condition precedent to the
effectiveness of the settlement.  The settlement remains subject to
finalization and execution of definitive documentation and certain
other conditions precedent.

                      Investment Transactions

Uniti announced that it is expanding its strategic partnership with
Macquarie Infrastructure Partners.  Uniti recently sold to MIP, for
total cash consideration of approximately $168 million, an
ownership stake in the entity that controls Uniti's Midwest fiber
network assets.  These assets were leased to MIP as part of the
Bluebird Network OpCo-PropCo transaction.  The assets in Propco
include the fiber network previously acquired from Bluebird and the
Company's existing Midwest fiber network that was contributed as
part of the OpCo-PropCo transaction.  Uniti is also in discussions
with MIP to lease to Bluebird additional fiber owned by the
Company, including fiber that will be acquired as part of our
recent settlement with Windstream.

Uniti retained an investment interest in the assets, and the fiber
network will continue to be leased to MIP at a fixed cash yield of
8.5%.  As part of the transaction, Uniti will receive an additional
earnout payment in early 2023 of up to approximately $20 million if
Bluebird achieves certain milestones.

On June 1, 2020, Uniti completed the sale of its U.S. tower
business to Melody Investment Advisors LP for total cash
consideration of approximately $220 million.  Uniti retained an
investment interest in the tower business through an affiliate of
Melody.

               Liquidity and Financing Transactions

At quarter-end, the Company had approximately $378.3 million of
unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, and undrawn borrowing
availability under its revolving credit agreement.  The Company's
leverage ratio at quarter end was 6.1x based on Net Debt to
Annualized Adjusted EBITDA.

On Aug. 4, 2020, the Company's Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.15 per common share, payable on Oct.
2, 2020 to stockholders of record on Sept. 18, 2020.

                    Updated Full Year 2020 Outlook

The Company is updating its 2020 outlook for (i) the preliminary
estimated impact from the court-approved settlement agreement with
Windstream, (ii) the impact from the partial sale of the Company's
ownership interest in the Bluebird PropCo, (iii) transaction
related costs and other items reported in the second quarter of
this year, and (iv) other business unit level revisions.  The
Company's 2020 outlook assumes the Windstream lease continues in
full force and effect and that Windstream continues to make all
lease payments on time, and that the Company will distribute all of
the Company's REIT taxable income such that it will not be subject
to corporate level income taxes.  The Company's current outlook
excludes future acquisitions, capital market transactions, and
future transaction related and other costs not mentioned herein.
Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking
statements.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/deIzfo

                           About Uniti

Headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas, Uniti --
http://www.uniti.com-- is an internally managed real estate
investment trust.  It is engaged in the acquisition and
construction of mission critical communications infrastructure, and
is a provider of wireless infrastructure solutions for the
communications industry.  As of June 30, 2020, Uniti owns 6.5
million fiber strand miles and other communications real estate
throughout the United States.

As of March 31, 2020, the Company had $5.01 billion in total
assets, $6.61 billion in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $1.59 million.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, in Little Rock, Arkansas, the Company's
auditor since 2014, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated March 12, 2020, citing that the Company's most
significant customer, Windstream Holdings, Inc., which accounts for
approximately 65.0% of consolidated total revenues for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2019, filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and uncertainties surrounding
potential impacts to the Company resulting from Windstream
Holdings, Inc.'s bankruptcy filing raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                           *   *    *

As reported by the TCR on July 24, 2020, Moody's Investors Service
placed all ratings for Uniti Group Inc. on review for upgrade,
including the Caa2 corporate family rating.  The review for upgrade
reflects the June 2020 court approved bankruptcy plan of Windstream
Services, LLC, Uniti's largest tenant and main source of revenue.

Fitch Ratings affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings and
security ratings of Uniti Group, Inc. and Uniti Fiber Holdings at
'CCC', the TCR reported on March 20, 2020.

Also in March 2020, S&P Global Ratings placed all ratings on U.S.
telecom REIT Uniti Group Inc., including the 'CCC-' issuer credit
rating, on CreditWatch with positive implications.  The CreditWatch
placement follows the company's announcement it reached an
agreement in principle with its largest tenant Windstream Holdings
Inc. to resolve all legal claims it asserted against Uniti in the
context of Windstream's bankruptcy proceedings.


UTEX INDUSTRIES: S&P Lowers ICR to 'D' on Missed Interest Payment
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on UTEX
Industries Inc. to 'D' from 'CCC'.

The downgrade reflects UTEX's decisions to skip its interest
payments on its first-lien and second-lien term loans, not repay
borrowings on its credit facility, and enter into a forbearance
agreement with certain first-lien debt holders. Despite its ongoing
negotiations with creditors and the forbearance agreement, S&P
doesn't expect UTEX to make its interest payments within the grace
period.

UTEX is a privately held designer and manufacturer of engineered
seals and related components. Most of UTEX's products have short
lifecycles and must be replenished periodically. The company's
products primarily serve the completions, production, and drilling
segments of the oil and gas industry.


V.S. INVESTMENT: Has Until Oct. 30 to File Plan & Disclosure
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher M. Alston of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Washington at Seattle has entered an order
within which Debtor V.S. Investment Assoc., LLC, will file a plan
and disclosure statement by Oct. 30, 2020.

The deadline for non-governmental creditors to file proofs of claim
is Sept. 28, 2020.

A copy of the order dated July 14, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y63dorpe from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                    About V.S. Investment

V S Investment Assoc LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 20-11541) on May 29,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the
same range.  Judge Christopher M. Alston oversees the case.  The
Debtor has tapped Bountiful Law, PLLC, as its legal counsel.


VERITAS US: S&P Rates New $600MM Senior Secured Notes 'B'
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level and '2' recovery
ratings to U.S.-based information management software provider
Veritas US Inc. and Veritas Bermuda Ltd.'s new five-year $600
million senior secured notes. Veritas intends to use proceeds from
the issuance to redeem existing secured indebtedness. The '2'
recovery rating reflects its expectation of substantial recovery
(70%-90%; rounded estimate: 70%) in a payment default.

S&P bases its unchanged 'B-' issuer credit rating and negative
outlook on its forecast of very high financial leverage of over 9x
for the current fiscal year and mid- to high-single-digit percent
revenue declines amid a backdrop of macroeconomic weakness. A
substantial pro forma cash balance of $568 million and an improved
maturity profile provide support to the rating.

Issue Ratings--Recovery Analysis

Key analytical factors

-- S&P values Veritas on a going-concern basis using a 6.5x
multiple of its projected distressed EBITDA, reflecting the
company's recurring revenue base and high switching costs.

-- S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a default in
calendar year 2022 due to a significant decline in revenue from
increasing competition and a lack of sales traction in new
products.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Simulated year of default: 2022
-- EBITDA at emergence: $460 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 6.5x
-- Revolver: 85% drawn at default

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): About $3
billion

-- Collateral value available to secured creditors: About $2.8
billion

-- Secured first-lien claims: About $3.9 billion

-- Recovery expectation: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 70%)

-- Senior unsecured debt: About $880 million

-- Recovery expectation: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 5%)


VISITING NURSE: American Healthcare Serves as Adviser on Sale
-------------------------------------------------------------
American Healthcare Capital, a national healthcare M&A advisory
firm, on Aug. 11 announced the sale of Visiting Nurse Association
of the Inland Counties dba VNA California, a nonprofit Hospice and
Home Health provider located in Riverside and Palm Desert,
California. Originally founded in 1931, VNA is one of the largest
and oldest Southern California Hospice and Home Health providers
with over $15 million of annualized revenue.

VNA was acquired in tandem by two separate operators, Bristol
Hospice (http://bristolhospice.com/),a multi-state Hospice
provider with a growing presence on the West Coast, and HealthSure
Management Services (http://vnahomehealthandhospice.com/),a
provider based in the Southern California area. Bristol is the
successor to the Debtor's Hospice care and HealthSure is the
successor to the Debtor's Home Health care.

"This was truly a collaborative effort. Our team worked
side-by-side with the restructuring company and attorneys to arrive
at the best possible outcome for all parties involved. In the end,
the company continued to service their patients, avoided large
scale reductions in personnel, and satisfied their creditors. It
was a pleasure helping this long-standing agency transition to new
ownership," said Andre Ulloa, Principal, and Mark Thomas, Senior
Analyst, at American Healthcare Capital.

"We needed a niche focused healthcare M&A team who could devote the
time and energy required to aid us in selling the Debtor to
partners that will continue our high standards of patient care.
Andre Ulloa and Mark Thomas of Team M+A were a big factor in
achieving this goal," said Adam Meislik, of Force 10 Partners,
Chief Restructuring Officer for VNA.

                         About Team M + A

Team M+A -- http://www.HealthcareDealTeam.com-- at American
Healthcare Capital consists of the company’s top performing
advisors and analysts: Mike Moran, Andre Ulloa, and Mark Thomas.
They have successfully sold businesses in a variety of segments
including Home Health, Hospice, Private Duty, Behavioral Health,
I/DD, DME, Medical Staffing, Long Term Care Facilities, Urgent Care
and all types of Pharmacy.

               About Visiting Nurse Association
                     of the Inland Counties

Visiting Nurse Association of the Inland Counties --
http://www.vnacalifornia.org/-- is a not-for-profit organization
that provides health, palliative and hospice services when in-home
care is needed or preferred.  It offers a full continuum of care
for patients, including home health, hospice and bereavement
services.  The company is headquartered in Riverside, California,
with patient care centers in Palm Desert and Murrieta.

Visiting Nurse Association of the Inland Counties sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-16908) on Aug. 15, 2018.  In the petition signed by Bruce
Gordon, corporate controller, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $10 million
to $50 million.  

Judge Mark D. Houle oversees the case.  

Weiland Golden Goodrich LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.

On Sept. 13, 2018, the U.S. trustee appointed Jerry Seelig as
patient care ombudsman in the Debtor's case.  The PCO tapped
Perkins Coie LLP as his legal counsel.

On Sept. 19, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee retained Marshack
Hays LLP as counsel.



VIVUS INC: Aug. 19 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
-------------------------------------------------
VIVUS, Inc., and its debtor affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a motion for entry of
an order scheduling a combined hearing to consider approval of the
Disclosure Statement, approval of the Solicitation Procedures, and
confirmation of the Plan.

On July 10, 2020, Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein granted the
motion and ordered that:

   * Aug. 19, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. is the hearing to consider
compliance with disclosure and solicitation requirements and
confirmation of the Debtors' Plan.

   * Aug. 10, 2020 is fixed as the last day to file any responses
and objections to the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement and/or
confirmation of the Plan.

   * Aug. 17, 2020 at 12:00 p.m. is fixed as the last day to file
any brief in support of the Disclosure Statement and confirmation
of the Plan and reply to any objections.

   * Aug. 3, 2020 is fixed as the last day for the Debtors to file
the Plan Supplement.

A copy of the order dated July 10, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y7r7e8vz from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                        About Vivus Inc

Vivus Inc -- https://www.vivus.com/ -- is a biopharmaceutical
company committed to the development and commercialization of
innovative therapies that focus on advancing treatments for
patients with serious unmet medical needs.  VIVUS has three
approved therapies and one product candidate in clinical
development.  Qsymia (phentermine and topiramate extended release)
is approved by FDA for chronic weight management.   The Company
commercializes Qsymia in the U.S. through a specialty sales force
supported by an internal commercial team and license the commercial
rights to Qsymia in South Korea. VIVUS was incorporated in 1991 in
California and reincorporated in 1996 in Delaware.  As of the
Petition Date, VIVUS is a publicly traded company with its shares
listed on the Nasdaq Global Market LLC under the ticker symbol
"VVUS."  The Company maintains its headquarters in Campbell,
California.

Vivus Inc and three of its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
20-11779) on July 7, 2020.  The petitions were signed by Mark Oki,
chief financial officer.  

As of May 31, 2020, the Debtors reported total assets of
$213,884,000 and total liabilities of $281,669,000.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein presides over the cases.

Weil Gotshal & Manges LP serves as general counsel to the Debtors,
while Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. acts as local counsel to the
Debtors.  Ernst & Young is the Debtors' financial advisor, and
Piper Sandler Companies acts as investment banker.   Stretto is
claims and noticing agent to the Debtors.


WEST ALLEY BBQ: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: West Alley BBQ LLC
        1110 Vann Drive
        Jackson, TN 38305

Business Description: West Alley BBQ LLC owns a barbecue
                      restaurant in Jackson, Tennessee.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: August 12, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Tennessee

Case No.: 20-11107

Judge: Hon. Jimmy L. Croom

Debtor's Counsel: Thomas H. Strawn, Esq.
                  STRAWN LAW FIRM
                  400 Masonic St.
                  Dyersburg, TN 38024
                  Tel: 731-285-3375
                  Email: thstrawn42@bellsouth.net,
                         billedwards62@bellsouth.net

Total Assets: $10,100

Total Liabilities: $1,268,023

The petition was signed by Bardo Brantley, CEO.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                 https://tinyurl.com/y3egv3pk


WYNDHAM HOTELS: S&P Assigns 'B+' Rating to Senior Unsecured Notes
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B+' issue-level rating and '6'
recovery rating to the proposed senior unsecured notes due 2028, to
be issued by Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Inc. S&P assumes the issuance
amount is at least $350 million. Its ratings on the proposed notes
are the same as those on existing unsecured debt issued by Wyndham.
The '6' recovery rating reflected its expectation of negligible
(0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) recovery for unsecured lenders in
the event of a payment default.

S&P assumes the proposed debt issuance does not affect its forecast
of net debt or leverage because the company intends to use proceeds
to repay amounts drawn on the revolving credit facility and accrue
to the balance sheet as precautionary, long-term liquidity. S&P's
base case forecast is that Wyndham's adjusted debt to EBITDA would
spike above 5x in 2020, potentially improving to about 5x in 2021
if lodging demand continues to recover as consumers gradually
rebuild confidence in their ability to travel safely amid the
COVID-19 pandemic. S&P believes the likely path of recovery is that
leisure travel would recover first, business transient second, and
group third. Wyndham is favorably positioned to benefit from the
anticipated recovery relative to lodging peers, because its
occupancy is nearly 70% attributable to leisure travel and group
travel accounts for a negligible percentage. In addition, Wyndham
has demonstrated that it can operate a fairly flexible cost
structure, partly by reducing $20 million of capital expenditures
in 2020 and $40 million of permanent operating, general, and
administrative costs annually over future years.

"Our 'BB' issuer credit rating, negative outlook, and all other
ratings on Wyndham are unchanged. For the complete issuer credit
rating rationale, see our most recent research update on Wyndham,
published April 13, 2020," S&P said.

ISSUE RATINGS – RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors:

-- The issue-level rating is 'BB+' and the recovery rating is '2'
on the senior secured debt, which consists of a $750 million senior
secured revolving credit facility due 2023 and a $1.6 billion
senior secured term loan due 2025. The '2' recovery rating
indicates S&P's expectation of substantial (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 75%) recovery in a default.

-- The issue-level rating is 'B+' and the recovery rating is '6'
on the senior unsecured debt. The unsecured debt consists of $500
million of existing notes and the proposed issuance. The '6'
recovery rating indicates its expectation of negligible
(0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) recovery in a default.

Simulated default assumptions:

-- S&P's simulated default scenario contemplates a payment default
in 2025 driven by a prolonged economic downturn that significantly
reduces leisure travel, combined with a deterioration in Wyndham's
brands that causes a substantial loss of franchisees.

-- S&P assumes a reorganization following the default, using an
emergence EBITDA multiple of 7x to value the company.

Simplified waterfall:

-- Emergence EBITDA: $264 million

-- EBITDA multiple: 7x

-- Gross recovery value: $1.845 billion

-- Net recovery value for waterfall after 5% administrative
expenses: $1.75 billion

-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 95%/5%

-- Estimated secured debt claims: $2.21 billion

-- Value available for senior secured claims: $1.73 billion

-- Recovery expectation: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 75%)

-- Estimated unsecured debt claims: $873 million

-- Value available for unsecured and pari passu deficiency debt
claims: $31 million

-- Recovery expectation: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 0%)

All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.


XENIA HOTELS: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issuer credit rating to Xenia
Hotels & Resorts Inc., and its 'B+' issue-level rating and '1'
recovery rating to XHR L.P.'s proposed $300 million of senior
secured notes due 2025. The '1' recovery rating indicates its
expectation for very high (90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%)
recovery for lenders in a hypothetical default scenario.

"The 'B-' rating reflects our forecast for very high leverage in
2020 and the company's significant operating uncertainty, which
could lead it to sustain leverage of close to 10x in 2021 even
under a recovery scenario.  Since the pandemic began, the luxury
and upper upscale lodging segments have underperformed the rest of
the industry, and Xenia's performance has been disproportionately
affected because it competes in these segments. In addition, the
company generated over 70% of its total revenue from group and
business transient travel in 2019, which we expect will be slower
to recover than the overall lodging industry," S&P said.

The anticipated decline in Xenia's RevPAR and revenue puts
significant pressure on its hotel-level profitability. Hotel
owners, such as Xenia, will probably be unable to reduce their
costs enough to remain profitable in 2020. Under such a scenario,
the company's leverage would likely rise to very high levels in
2020. Pro forma for the transaction, S&P views Xenia's liquidity as
adequate, though it expects its liquidity to decline as it funds
hotel operating losses, corporate overhead costs, maintenance
capital expenditure (capex), and debt service over at least the
next few months.

The resurgence of COVID-19 cases across much of the U.S., the
roll-back of reopening plans, precautionary behavior, restricted
capacity, and the uncertainty around additional government support
pose a rising downside risk to consumers' ability and willingness
to spend and travel. The most likely path of recovery would begin
with leisure travel followed by business transient and, finally,
group travel. The recovery in group travel may span several years,
partly due to potential lingering concerns about gatherings and
social-distancing norms. Given the material decline in Xenia's
RevPAR in 2020, S&P believes its RevPAR may recover in 2021 if
travel begins to resume but expect it to remain about 20%-30% below
its 2019 RevPAR. Such a scenario would enable the company to
improve its margin in 2021 and potentially reduce its adjusted debt
to EBITDA to about 10x.

Key risk factors include Xenia's high revenue exposure to business
transient and group travel and its exposure to destination markets
like San Francisco and Orlando that may recover more slowly as
leisure consumers and business transient travelers gradually gain
confidence they can travel safely.

S&P believes Xenia's liquidity is adequate.  Xenia had $306 million
of cash as of the second quarter of 2020. In addition, the company
received a $19 million cash deposit in July related to the
terminated sale of certain hotels. S&P anticipates that Xenia's
monthly cash usage under the severe hypothetical scenario--in which
all of its portfolio hotels are closed--would be about $28 million,
including interest on the proposed debt issuance. The company had
total pro forma liquidity sources of about $529 million as of the
second quarter of 2020, including balance sheet cash, the proceeds
from the proposed notes issuance, the cash deposit related to its
terminated hotel sales, and revolver availability. Incorporating
the proposed notes issuance, S&P believes Xenia's liquidity runway
under the severe hypothetical scenario would exceed 18 months and
forecast its runway would be even longer assuming some level of
occupancy and revenue over the forecast period. S&P's base case
does not assume all of Xenia's hotels remain suspended indefinitely
and forecasts that a recovery would be underway in the third
quarter of 2020. For the remainder of 2020, the company may also
generate some revenue from lodging essential workers and leisure
travelers if leisure demand recovers sequentially.

However, S&P assumes Xenia's operating cash flow and EBITDA will be
negative over the next two quarters. Approximately 17% of the
company's room base remained shut as of July 31, 2020, which will
put significant pressure on its hotel-level profitability and lead
to material anticipated operating losses after considering its
corporate, general, and administrative costs. Over the next two to
three quarters, S&P expects Xenia's cash balances and revolver to
be its key sources of liquidity. The company's liquidity uses
include hotel-level operating expenses and working capital needs,
corporate-level overhead costs, interest expense and debt
amortization, and capex.

S&P's rating incorporates the asset quality of Xenia's hotel
portfolio.  Xenia has a high-quality, geographically diverse
portfolio of hotels, notably in a number of Sunbelt states. The
company's focus on quality assets and its long-term management
contracts with Marriott, Hyatt, and other well-known brands enable
it to garner relatively high average daily rates. Offsetting
considerations include Xenia's smaller scale compared to rated
peers that are lodging REITs, as well as its modestly lower EBITDA
margin. In S&P's view, competitors Host, Park, and Ryman own some
very large and hard to replicate assets in locations that are
typically attractive to business and group travelers. While the
recovery path for these hotels may be slower than for Xenia's
portfolio over the next year or two, these qualities normally
represent competitive advantages and barriers to entry for
competitors in their respective markets, and may again in future
years if business and group travel recovers sufficiently.

Xenia's asset base provides the flexibility to monetize individual
assets to reduce debt if needed even if the timing may be
disadvantageous given the ongoing recession. S&P assumes no asset
sales in its base-case forecast through 2021, partly because the
market for lodging properties will likely remain unfavorable for
some time and the timing and transaction size of noncore asset
sales are not easily quantifiable. However, S&P believes the
breadth of Xenia's portfolio and its lower room count per property
relative to its peers with larger properties could facilitate
potential sales. The company also demonstrated its willingness to
sell assets as recently as May. Therefore, S&P believes Xenia could
be opportunistic if needed and if the bid-ask spread for properties
continues to narrow. These factors contribute to S&P's stable
outlook. To the extent that Xenia uses the proceeds from asset
sales for debt repayment, S&P likely would view it as credit
positive as long as the company sells the assets for a higher
multiple than its leverage.

These positive attributes are partly offset by the cyclical nature
of the lodging industry and the high revenue and earnings
volatility associated with hotel ownership. Xenia's concentration
in luxury and upper upscale segments could lead to greater
volatility in its EBITDA over the cycle than for hotel owners
focused on the economy or midscale segments. This is because
pricing tends to compress during an economic downturn, which has
the greatest effect on the luxury segment and the least severe
effect on the economy segment. As a result, Xenia is more exposed
to EBITDA variability over the cycle than hotel owners in
lower-price, select-service segments and lodging managers and
franchisers that do not have an owner's fixed cost burden.

"We believe Xenia's track record suggests it will reduce its
leverage over time.  Xenia's leverage ranged from 3.1x to 4.2x over
the past few years and was 4.1x as of year-end 2019. Based on the
company's track record, we believe it will be motivated to reduce
its leverage to historical levels, if it can, over the next several
years," S&P said.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors relevant
to this rating change:

-- Health and safety

The outlook is stable despite very high anticipated leverage in
2021 and reflects adequate liquidity for Xenia to cope with its
anticipated cash burn until lodging demand in its markets recovers
sufficiently to restore the portfolio to positive cash flow,
probably sometime in 2021. In addition, EBITDA coverage of interest
expense could be good for the rating in the high-1x area in 2021
according to S&P's base case, and the company has the financial
flexibility to monetize individual hotels, if needed, to repay debt
and potentially reduce leverage, depending upon a recovery in the
hotel transaction market and whether hotels can be sold at a
deleveraging multiple.

"We would consider lowering our ratings on Xenia if we believe the
recovery in lodging demand will be prolonged relative to our
expectations, rendering the company unable to generate sufficient
cash flow to sustain its capital structure. This could occur if we
lose confidence that Xenia will be able to reduce its leverage over
time, including by selling assets," S&P said.

"It is unlikely that we would consider upgrading Xenia for the
duration of the pandemic due to the disruption of lodging demand.
However, we could raise our ratings on the company if we believe it
can sustain adjusted debt to EBITDA of less than 8x and EBITDA
coverage of interest expense of more than 2x," the rating agency
said.


YETI INVESTMENT: Sept. 8 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
------------------------------------------------------
On May 28, 2020, debtor Yeti Investment, LLC, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman
Division, a Disclosure Statement referring to a Plan of
Reorganization.

On July 14, 2020, Judge Brenda T. Rhoades approved the Disclosure
Statement and ordered that:

   * Sept. 4, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written acceptances or rejections of the Plan in the form of a
ballot.

   * Sept. 8, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. is fixed for the hearing on
Confirmation of the Plan.

   * Aug. 28, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

A copy of the order dated July 14, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y5oaulrr from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                     About Yeti Investment

Yeti Investment, LLC, owns a real property in 2452 Fm 3364,
Princeton Texas having a current value of $3.9 million.  Yeti
Investment filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No.
20-40627) on March 2, 2020.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had
$3,900,000 in total assets and $2,156,000 in total liabilities.
The Debtor's counsel is Eric A. Liepins, Esq. of ERIC A. LIEPINS.


[*] Antitrust Factors for Bankruptcy Sales
------------------------------------------
Arnold & Porter partners Rosa Evergreen and Michael B. Bernstein,
and counsel Justin Hedge counsel, wrote on Law360 an article titled
"Key Antitrust Considerations For Upcoming Bankruptcy Sales":

The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant financial distress
for many businesses and there have been a number of bankruptcy
filings recently,[1] with more likely on the horizon. As a result,
there is likely to be an increase in acquisitions of companies or
assets out of bankruptcy.[2]

Companies considering bankruptcy sale-transactions need to consider
the structure that best suits their needs — e.g., a Section 363
sale, offering a separate sale process and potentially speed, or a
sale as part of the plan of reorganization or liquidation plan,
which allows for the sale to be incorporated into the plan
process.

It also is important to recognize that just because a target has
filed — or is likely to file — for bankruptcy, does not mean
that the transaction is immune from the antitrust laws. Parties to
transactions meeting certain thresholds must file notification with
the Federal Trade Commission and Antitrust Division of the U.S.
Department of Justice, and observe a waiting period prior to
closing.

And the U.S. antitrust authorities will continue to scrutinize and
investigate transactions raising substantive antitrust issues —
whether those transactions meet the threshold for filing or not.
Both the filing and substantive review occur independent of the
bankruptcy court's approval.

Below is a summary of the key issues to consider when contemplating
acquisitions in bankruptcy, especially those that may raise
antitrust issues.

Bankruptcy Overview

There are a number of considerations for a company when
contemplating acquiring the assets of a distressed company; one is
whether to acquire the assets pursuant to a Section 363 sale or a
sale under a confirmed plan of reorganization/liquidation.

Section 363 Sale

In a sale pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, a buyer
typically negotiates a purchase and sale agreement pursuant to
which the buyer agrees to acquire all or certain of the assets of
the target company, and agrees on the liabilities that the buyer is
willing to assume in connection with the acquisition of the
identified assets. The parties also agree upon the contracts that
will be assumed and assigned to the buyer in connection with the
acquisition of the identified assets.

In connection with the negotiation of the purchase agreement, the
buyer and target company also negotiate the terms and conditions of
bidding procedures that will be operative in connection with the
sale of the assets pursuant to the agreement. These procedures
generally include, among others, a breakup fee and expense
reimbursement that will be payable to the buyer if a third party
outbids the buyer at any auction.   

Under the sale process described above, the buyer is often referred
to as the "stalking horse bidder" and the requisite purchase
agreement and associated bid procedures to be implemented in
connection with the sale of the assets to the stalking horse bidder
are generally fully negotiated between the buyer and the target
company prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings.

In this scenario, the fully negotiated purchase agreement and bid
procedures, and the motions seeking the approval of the agreement
and the bid procedures, are then submitted to the bankruptcy court
for approval at the same time, or close in time, to the
commencement of the bankruptcy proceedings.

In other cases, typically where a company has not identified an
agreed-upon buyer prior to its bankruptcy filing, the company, now
a debtor in bankruptcy, instead seeks approval of bid procedures
without an identified stalking horse bidder and attempts to use the
process of soliciting bids as a way to find a potential buyer
during the bankruptcy.

In either case — that is, with a stalking horse bidder or simply
the debtor seeking to establish bid procedures separately during
the bankruptcy case — upon receipt of the bankruptcy court's
approval of the bid procedures, the debtor can conduct the auction
process to ascertain if there are any qualified bidders, as
applicable, and to the extent any such bidders are identified,
conduct an auction to determine the ultimate winning bidder.

Once the winning bidder has been determined, the actual sale of the
assets is submitted to the bankruptcy court for approval, and
subject to receipt of the bankruptcy court's approval — and any
closing conditions in the purchase agreement — the sale may be
consummated.

Some benefits of an acquisition of assets pursuant to a Section 363
sale in bankruptcy include:

  * Speed — the potential for closing within 60-90 days;
  * Potentially lower transaction costs;
  * Ability to cherry-pick assets and liabilities to be assumed;
  * Ability to obtain assets free and clear of liens and claims;
  * Potential assumption of restricted contracts and assignment of
same to the buyer; and
  * Buyer protections, including potential breakup fees, expense
reimbursements, influence on the minimum overbid amount and other
terms of the bidding procedures.

Plan of Reorganization/Liquidation

In addition to acquiring the assets of a target company pursuant to
a Section 363 sale, an interested buyer may seek a sale process
effectuated under a confirmed plan of reorganization or
liquidation.

In this context, the target company/debtor proposes a plan pursuant
to which the debtor agrees to sell the designated assets, subject
to the assumption of agreed upon liabilities, to an identified
buyer pursuant to a Section 363-like process that is incorporated
into the plan; that is, such sale is subject to the debtor's
receipt of higher and better offers from third parties, which could
be solicited pursuant to bidding procedures implemented in
connection with the plan.

Although a sale of assets in connection with a plan is like a
Section 363 sale in that the buyer ultimately acquires the
designated assets generally free and clear of liens and claims,
subject only to the agreed upon assumed liabilities, because the
sale is implemented in connection with the plan process it may be
subject to all of the uncertainties, time delays, procedural
requirements and impediments that are generally inherent in the
plan process.

For these reasons, the acquisition of assets by means of a sale
process implemented in connection with a plan is generally utilized
only where agreement has been reached among the debtor and its key
creditor constituencies prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy
proceedings regarding the sale of the debtor's assets. In this
context, the plan is effectively prepackaged or prenegotiated by
the debtor with its key creditor constituencies in order to avoid
any unforeseen circumstances or time delays.

Generally, the benefits of acquiring assets pursuant to a
prepackaged or prenegotiated plan are as follows:

  * Major stakeholders have agreed on critical terms prior to the
filing.

  * Assets can generally be transferred free and clear of
encumbrances and interests.

  * Restricted contracts can often be transferred.

  * Plan benefits from the transfer tax exemption under Section
1146(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.

  * Prepackaged plan potentially shortens and simplifies the
bankruptcy process.

  * With respect to a prepackaged plan, votes for the plan have
often already been solicited and approval received prior to the
filing.

  * Parties' interests are more likely aligned, which facilitates
bankruptcy court approval of the plan and the documentation of the
sale transaction.

  * Once filed, the bankruptcy generally proceeds fairly quickly.

Antitrust Considerations in Bankruptcy-Related Transactions

Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Filings Can Have Accelerated Waiting Periods
in Bankruptcy, But Not Always

Acquisitions of voting securities or assets above the annually
adjusted thresholds,[3] including those made during a bankruptcy
process, require notification under the Hart-Scott-Rodino, or HSR,
Act.[4]

Under the HSR Act, parties typically must wait to close a
transaction until they have observed the 30-day waiting period from
the date both parties made their HSR notification with the DOJ and
the FTC. And that waiting period may be extended if the antitrust
authorities determine they need to investigate the transaction
further.[5] Even if the transaction does not meet the filing
thresholds, the antitrust authorities may investigate the
transaction and go to court to seek to block the closing.

For transactions covered by Section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code,
there is a shortened waiting period of only 15 days from the day
both parties make their notifications under the HSR Act.[6] This
means sales pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code can
receive a shorter waiting period; however, all other bankruptcy
transactions subject to the HSR Act fall within the typical 30-day
waiting period and do not receive an abbreviated waiting period.

Antitrust Review of Bankruptcy or Distressed Deals Proceed as
Normal, But Parties May Have a Good Failing Firm Defense

The U.S. antitrust authorities review bankruptcy-related
transactions in the same manner as they would any other transaction
— by assessing whether the transaction would substantially lessen
competition.[7] This is the case for both HSR-reportable
transactions, as well as transactions that do not trigger a filing
requirement under the HSR Act. And both the FTC[8] and DOJ[9] have
made clear that the COVID-19 pandemic has not changed that
approach.[10]

When the target is distressed, or even entering bankruptcy
proceedings, there is a logical argument that its competitive
significance has been reduced. The antitrust authorities, however,
seek to maintain whatever competitive pressure remains and preserve
the potential for such targets to become more competitive in the
future where possible. As a result, it is not atypical for the
authorities to investigate and even challenge transactions made out
of bankruptcy — particularly when the parties are competitors.

For instance, in November 2019, Dean Foods Co. filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy, and in March 2020, pursuant to bidding procedures
entered in the bankruptcy proceeding, Dean Foods selected the Dairy
Farmers of America Inc. as its winning bidder for the majority of
its assets.[11]

In May 2020, the DOJ Antitrust Division, together with the
Massachusetts and Wisconsin attorneys general, filed a lawsuit in
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois to
prevent the sale on antitrust grounds.[12]

Simultaneously with the filing of the complaint, the parties
entered into a settlement requiring the divestiture of certain milk
processing plants to alleviate the competition concerns with the
proposed transaction.[13]

Similarly, in June 2020, real estate information service provider
CoStar Group Inc. received bankruptcy court approval to buy
RentPath Holdings Inc. pursuant to the confirmation of Rentpath and
its affiliated debtors joint Chapter 11 plan (with the sale
transaction incorporated into the terms of the plan).

In April 2020, CoStar reported that the FTC had issued a second
request and opened an investigation into the competitive effects of
the proposed transaction.[14] The transaction still has not
closed.

And in a number of instances, after a thorough investigation, the
authorities may believe the transaction out of bankruptcy will
substantially lessen competition and seek to litigate. For example,
while the case was ultimately settled, the DOJ sued to block US
Airways Group Inc.'s acquisition of American Airlines Inc. out of
bankruptcy in 2013.[15]

In 2001, the DOJ also litigated to enjoin a proposed Sungard Data
Systems Inc. acquisition of Comdisco Inc. out of bankruptcy.[16]
The bankruptcy court had approved SunGard, a competitor to Comdisco
as the winning bidder. The DOJ challenged the transaction on the
grounds that it would substantially lessen competition for disaster
recovery services. The DOJ ultimately lost its bid to enjoin the
transaction, but it demonstrates that the antitrust authorities may
challenge transactions even when a target has entered bankruptcy.  


However, the antitrust authorities will consider the competitive
standing of a company that is in bankruptcy or how COVID-19 may be
reshaping certain market conditions. These are important
considerations that the antitrust authorities will evaluate. In
fact, courts and the antitrust authorities have recognized that in
certain circumstances a failing firm defense is valid and a
complete defense to potential antitrust concerns. In short, if it
is so obvious that the assets will otherwise exit the market, it
alleviates the potential competitive concerns with the
transaction.

To use this defense, however, a buyer must demonstrate not just
that the target is merely in distress or that bankruptcy may be
imminent. Rather, the defense will only be accepted in a narrower
set of circumstances.

Guidance issued by the DOJ and the FTC is instructive.[17] The
antitrust authorities require the following to establish the
defense:

  * Evidence that the allegedly failing firm is not able to meet
its financial obligations in the near future or reorganize
successfully under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code;

  * Evidence that the failing firm "made unsuccessful good-faith
efforts to elicit reasonable alternative offers that would keep its
tangible and intangible assets in the relevant market and pose a
less severe danger to competition than does the proposed
merger";[18] and

  * To the extent there were other offers, evidence that it
rejected other suitors for good reasons, in good faith, or had no
alternative buyers from which to choose.

Often, when the parties cannot demonstrate the narrow circumstances
of the failing firm defense, they may attempt to argue that the
distressed or failing firm nature of the target is relevant to the
analysis of potential competitive effects. However, this alone is
typically not likely to be sufficient to resolve competition
concerns. For example, in Promedica Health System Inc. v. FTC, the
court called the defense the "the Hail–Mary pass of presumptively
doomed mergers."[19]

As such, parties anticipating that they will advance arguments
about the target being in distress still should be prepared to
engage in an in-depth factual analysis and advocacy as they would
in other merger circumstances.

Key Takeaways

Parties involved in bankruptcy transactions need to consider (1)
whether there is a requirement to file under the HSR Act, and (2)
whether the transaction raises any substantive antitrust concerns
that might be investigated and delay closing.

Buyers that pose significant antitrust issues or risks, may not
represent the highest and otherwise best offer to be selected as
the winning bidder in a bankruptcy auction, despite having the
highest purchase price because their ability and timeline to get to
closing may be in question.

If buyers that pose some substantive antitrust risk want to have a
realistic risk of closing on the quicker timelines of a bankruptcy
or distressed sale, they should invest upfront and develop a
strategy to (1) convince the seller that the risk is manageable;
(2) convince the other stakeholders in the bankruptcy and/or the
bankruptcy court that the antitrust issues will not be an obstacle
to closing; and (3) convince the antitrust authorities that the
transaction does not raise significant concerns — including by
potentially offering divestiture remedies and an upfront buyer
ready if needed.

Parties to smaller transactions must still be cognizant of the
potential antitrust issues that may arise, even if the transaction
is not reportable under HSR Act. The U.S. antitrust authorities can
— and do — investigate nonreportable transactions that raise
substantial issues when they are aware of such transactions.

In fact, due to the public nature of the bankruptcy proceedings and
related press coverage, the antitrust authorities are likely to be
aware of the transaction without even having to be notified.
Therefore, they will have the opportunity to investigate — and
potentially intervene in the bankruptcy proceeding — if there are
substantive antitrust concerns.

                           *    *    *

[1] For example, as of the end of May 2020, there were already a
number of well-known retailers and restaurant chains that filed for
bankruptcy, with the vast majority of those filings occurring
between March and May 2020. These include Tuesday Morning, J. Crew,
Pier 1, Modell's Sporting Goods, True Religion, Lucky's Market,
Earth Fare, Neiman Marcus, John Varvatos and others. See Business
Insider, These 16 Retailers and Restaurant Chains Have Filed for
Bankruptcy or Liquidation in 2020 (June 1, 2020); see also J.Crew,
Neiman Marcus, and Others Are Filing For Bankruptcy. What Does That
Mean, Exactly? (May 12, 2020).

[2] See e.g. Business Insider, Dean Foods Receives Court Approval
for the Sale of Substantially All of Its Assets (Apr. 4, 2020);
Construction Dive, Judge Approves McDermott Reorganization, $2.7B
Sale of Lummus Technology (Mar. 13, 2020); Reuters, U.S. Bankruptcy
Court Approves $220 Million Sale of Shale Firm Alta Mesa (Apr.
2020); The Real Deal, Costar Acquires Troubled Rental Listings Firm
for $588M (Feb. 12, 2020).

[3] The current lowest size-of-transaction threshold is $94
million. All current thresholds can be found here.

[4] 15 U.S.C. 18a.

[5] 16 CFR 803.10(b).

[6] 16 CFR 803.10(b) (providing for a 15-day waiting period for an
acquisition covered by 11 U.S.C. 363(b)). HSR guidance also
provides for the filing by multiple bidders to file on a court's
order but clarifies that "it's only a 363(b) filing that gets the
shortened waiting period." See FTC Informal Interpretation
#1307002.

[7] See 15 U.S.C. 18.

[8] FTC stated it would "not suspend {its} usual rigorous approach"
even though it was "navigat{ing} uncharted waters" and working
remotely. FTC, Antitrust review at the FTC: staying the course
during uncertain times (Apr. 6, 2020).

[9] DOJ made similar statements that while it will cooperate with
parties in navigating process changes made due to COVID, it will
still act consistently with its responsibilities under the
antitrust laws. DOJ, Justice Department Announces Antitrust Civil
Process Changes for Pendency of COVID-19 Event (March 17, 2020).

[10] This continued rigor by the antitrust authorities impacts not
only the review of acquisitions, but also the review of potential
buyers of any divestitures to be made to resolve competitive
concerns with a transaction. As a result, divestiture buyers should
be even more prepared to explain their ability to finance the
acquisition and rationale for buying the assets, provide business
plans, and make personnel from the buyer and its financing sources
available.

[11] Complaint, United States v. Dairy Farmers of Am., 20-cv-02658
(May 1, 2020).

[12] Id.

[13] Proposed Final Judgment, United States v. Dairy Farmers of
Am., 20-cv-02658 (N.D. Ill. May 1, 2020).

[14] CoStar Group Form 8-K April 30, 2020.

[15] Complaint, United States v. US Airways Group, Inc.,13-cv-01236
(D.D.C. Aug. 13, 2013).

[16] Complaint, United States v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc.,
01-2196 (D.D.C. Oct. 22, 2001).

[17] Dep't of Justice & FTC, Horizontal Merger Guidelines § 11
(Aug. 19, 2020).

[18] Id. Examples of good-faith efforts to elicit reasonable
alternative offers can include: (1) hiring investment bankers or
search consultants; (2) publicizing the sale; (3) formulating a
detailed and thorough proposal process; (4) seeking out a number of
potential partners; or, (5) a bankruptcy auction.

[19] Promedica Health Sys., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n  , 749 F.3d
559, 572 (6th Cir. 2014).


[*] Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Process Common Misconceptions
-------------------------------------------------------
David G. Dragich, founder of The Dragich Law Firm, wrote an article
on CFO titled "5 Common Misconceptions About the Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Process."

It has been years since businesses filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection at the pace they are today.  According to data from Epiq
Systems, commercial Chapter 11 filings were up 48% in May compared
with one year ago, with a total of 724 new petitions.  The surge in
filings comes as little surprise, as the COVID-19 pandemic is
hitting many sectors of the economy, particularly retail and
hospitality, hard.

Chapter 11 bankruptcy was a household term a decade ago, as
businesses sought refuge from the fallout of the financial crisis.
But it's creeping back into our collective consciousness.  Despite
its ubiquity in the headlines, there are common misconceptions
about what Chapter 11 means and what the process entails.  As a
result, some perceive Chapter 11 as a fix-all for troubled
companies, even though it's not.  Others would avoid Chapter 11 at
all costs, often to their detriment, for fear of being tagged by a
"scarlet letter."  The truth lies somewhere in the middle.  

Here are five of the most common misconceptions about Chapter 11
bankruptcy:

* Bankruptcy means going out of business

Just because a business files for bankruptcy does not mean it is
going out of business. While a Chapter 7 business bankruptcy filing
involves liquidation, Chapter 11 allows a business to restructure
its debts and remain in operation. A business going through Chapter
11 often downsizes as part of the process, but the objective is
reorganization, not liquidation. Some companies don't survive the
Chapter 11 process, but many others, including household names such
as Marvel Entertainment and General Motors, successfully emerge and
thrive.

Fundamentally, the result of most Chapter 11 cases is merely a
change in ownership in the newly reorganized entity from equity
holders to creditors and bondholders, since creditors and
bondholders are entitled to a higher priority on assets than
shareholders.

The stores remain operational, the assembly line keeps moving, and
the planes keep flying. In other words, the assets remain
productive — just under different ownership and debt structure.

Chapter 11 requires a one-size-fits-all approach

A financially distressed company can seek Chapter 11 protection to
halt litigation and collection efforts, negotiate with its
creditors, and propose and confirm a plan of reorganization that
allows the company to emerge from bankruptcy with a fresh start.
While that may be the traditional use of the process, Chapter 11
can be used also as a strategic tool to effectuate different
outcomes, including the sale of all or substantially all of the
company’s assets. Indeed, many companies that enter Chapter 11
have no intention of reorganizing as a going concern. The primary
purpose of many cases is to quickly conduct a sale (called a "363
sale") in which a buyer acquires the debtor’s assets. The
proceeds are used to pay creditor claims.  

The threat of bankruptcy itself can be used as a strategic tool,
allowing a company to reorganize outside of court.

The threat of bankruptcy itself can be used as a strategic tool,
allowing a company to reorganize outside of court. For example, a
company could threaten bankruptcy in order to negotiate more
favorable real property lease terms, which could otherwise be
rejected in a bankruptcy proceeding.  

Chapter 11 is a long, drawn-out process

There have been companies that have languished in Chapter 11 for
years, but a bankruptcy case does not need to drag on endlessly. In
fact, Chapter 11 cases can wrap up in as little as 24 hours. In
2019, Sungard Availability Services emerged from bankruptcy a mere
19 hours after its case was filed.

A lightning-fast bankruptcy is known as a prepackaged case, or
"prepack." It involves negotiation with creditors and voting on a
Chapter 11 plan before the bankruptcy case has even been filed.
Pre-negotiated cases are ones where a Chapter 11 plan is developed
before the filing with the company's principal creditors, and the
bankruptcy filing is premised on the plan. Prepackaged and
pre-negotiated cases, which take significantly less time than a
traditional, "free–fall" case, account for the majority of all
large Chapter 11 filings, according to the American Bankruptcy
Institute.

A bankrupt company has plenty of money because it doesn't have to
pay its creditors

Most Chapter 11 debtors enter bankruptcy with millions of dollars
in pre-petition debts — that is, debts they accrued before the
filing by withholding payments to lenders, landlords, and other
creditors. Accordingly, one might assume that having enough cash to
operate the business in bankruptcy would not be a concern. However,
in addition to needing cash to operate the business, a bankrupt
debtor must pay the costs associated with being in bankruptcy,
including the fees of lawyers and other professionals. Such costs
can total in the tens, and sometimes hundreds, of millions of
dollars in large cases.  

As a result, most debtors cannot rely on cash flow alone to get
through a Chapter 11, even if a company is aggressively cutting
operational costs during the process. In almost all cases of any
size, debtors must seek debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing to
help them get to the other side.  

Customers and vendors will flee

Commencing a Chapter 11 case involves filing a petition and paying
a filing fee. Most customers of a bankrupt company will likely
never know it is in Chapter 11 unless they're skimming through the
pages of The Wall Street Journal. People are still buying shoes at
Neiman Marcus and renting cars from Hertz. For all intents and
purposes, it's business as usual while the reorganization process
unfolds in bankruptcy court.  

Most vendors and suppliers, on the other hand, become aware when a
customer files for bankruptcy. Those who are creditors of the
bankrupt company will receive various notices throughout the case.
However, unless a debtor chooses to terminate a relationship, most
vendors and suppliers opt to stick around — even when they're
owed a prepetition debt.

In some instances, such as when there is an existing contract in
place obligating them to perform, vendors and suppliers have no
choice but to continue the relationship. In other instances, they
choose to because they’re entitled to be paid for goods and
services they provide as an "administrative expense" of the
bankruptcy — a high priority in the claim priority scheme
established by the Bankruptcy Code. As long as the debtor has
sufficient cash flow and DIP financing to operate, the risk of not
being paid while the debtor is in Chapter 11 tends to be low.

The wave of Chapter 11 bankruptcies is just building.  We are bound
to see many more cases filed in the months ahead.  Accordingly,
it's important, as a troubled company, or as the customer or
supplier of one, to understand the process. The failure to do so
can lead to poor decisions and missed opportunities.


[*] Household-Name Companies That Filed Bankruptcy Due to Pandemic
------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam K. Raymond, writing for NY Magazine, reports that numerous
household-name companies that filed bankruptcy protection in the
U.S. because of coronavirus pandemic and these are detailed in
here.

Thousands of businesses have been driven to bankruptcy by the
coronavirus, and you’ve likely never heard of most of them. But a
handful of household names, many of them already struggling before
the pandemic, are among the firms closing stores, laying off
employees, and restructuring due the economic turmoil created by
the virus. And while bankruptcy doesn't often spell death for large
companies, it can sometimes lead to liquidation of the business.

In the first half of 2020, more than 3,600 companies filed for
bankruptcy, according to Epiq. Just over 600 filed in June, up 43
percent from June of last year. And experts predict that things are
only going to get worse, the Times reports:
Edward I. Altman, the creator of the Z score, a widely used method
of predicting business failures, estimated that this year will
easily set a record for so-called mega bankruptcies — filings by
companies with $1 billion or more in debt. And he expects the
number of merely large bankruptcies — at least $100 million —
to challenge the record set the year after the 2008 economic
crisis.

Here are some of the biggest name firms to file for bankruptcy in
2020:

April 2020

Diamond Offshore and Whiting Petroleum: The two oil companies cited
a steep decrease in demand during lockdown and the oil price war
between Saudi Arabia and Russia.

May 2020

J.Crew: The Times called J.Crew the coronavirus's "first major
retail casualty" when its parent company filed for Chapter 11
protection in early May. The company has said "day-to-day
operations" will continue.

Gold's Gym: The gym chain proactively closed 30 company-owned gyms
in April before declaring for bankruptcy in May. It said the
decision will not "prevent us from continuing to support our system
of nearly 700 gyms around the world."

Neiman Marcus: After years of building an unsustainable debt
burden, Neiman Marcus was brutalized by the coronavirus, which
caused all of its 43 stores to temporarily close. The luxury chain
is now considering closures around the country, including in
Manhattan, where it opened a three-story, 188,000-square-foot
behemoth at Hudson Yards just last year.

J.C. Penney: Prior to coronavirus, the footprint of the once-iconic
mall retailer had fallen to less than a quarter of what it was in
2001. After its mid-May bankruptcy filing, it’s going to fall
more. The company is planning to shutter 154 stores.

Hertz: If no one is traveling, no one needs to rent a car. Car
rental giant Hertz was dealt a "rapid, sudden and dramatic' blow by
the coronavirus, the company said in May, leading to the biggest
bankruptcy filing of 2020.

Tuesday Morning: Pandemic-inspired shutdowns created an
"insurmountable financial hurdle" for the off-price retailer, which
is planning to close more than 200 of its 700 stores.

PQ New York: The owner of Le Pain Quotidien closed all 98 of its
U.S. locations during the pandemic and sold them to another
restaurant company that will reopen 35 of the locations and,
presumably, close the rest.

June 2020

GNC: The 85-year-old vitamin retailer saw 30 percent of its stores
in the U.S. and Canada temporarily close during the height of the
pandemic. The "dramatic negative impact" of these closures led to a
bankruptcy filing in late June. Roughly 20 percent, or 1,200 of its
5,800 retail stores will close.

24 Hour Fitness: After its bankruptcy filing on June 14, 24 Hour
Fitness will transition 133 of its locations to Zero Hour Fitness.
That is to say, they’re closing.

Chuck E. Cheese: On the same day that CEC Entertainment, which owns
550 Chuck E. Cheese and Peter Piper Pizza locations, reopened 266
venues, it also filed for bankruptcy. The company said the filing
will allow it to "strengthen our financial structure as we recover
from what has undoubtedly been the most challenging event in our
company’s history."

July 2020

Lucky Brand: Founded in 1990, the denim company Lucky Brand will
close 13 of its 200 stores after filing for bankruptcy brought on
by the coronavirus. "The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted
sales across all channels," interim CEO Matthew Kaness said in a
statement. It also announced plans for a sale to SPARC Group, which
owns the brands Nautica and Aeropostale.

Brooks Brothers: The iconic clothing company isn't calling it
quits, but it is up for a major restructuring after a bankruptcy
filing on July 8. Owner Claudio Del Vecchio told the Wall Street
Journal that the pandemic ravaged revenues for a company already
struggling amid a national shift to more casual dress. Its three
U.S. factories are slated to close in mid-August and the company
will search for a new buyer.




[*] Risks to Landlords When Tenants File for Bankruptcy
-------------------------------------------------------
Ira Herman of Blank Rome LLP wrote an article on JD Supra titled
"Bankruptcy Risks to Landlord When Tenants Files a Bankruptcy
Case."

This practice note discusses the risks to the landlord when a
tenant files for bankruptcy and the steps a landlord can take to
protect itself following a tenant's bankruptcy filing.

Once a tenant enters a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case and becomes a
debtor-in-possession, it has the option of assuming (and perhaps
assigning) or rejecting its unexpired lease.

Please see full article at

https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/bankruptcy-risks-to-landlord-when-86138/



[*] Smiley Wang-Ekvall Attorneys Named in Lawdragon 500 List
------------------------------------------------------------
Law firm Smiley | Wang-Ekvall -- leaders in business bankruptcy;
insolvency and reorganization law; business litigation; and real
estate transactions -- on Aug. 10 disclosed that Founding Partners
Lei Lei Wang-Ekvall and Kyra Andrassy have been named in the
inaugural Lawdragon 500 Leading U.S. Bankruptcy & Restructuring
Lawyers Guide. The publication says "the masters of disaster
recognized here bring remarkable skills in financing, structuring,
litigating and creating a pathway forward. Not even Houdini could
wrest the chains of these times, but these experts know all the
tricks for those companies seeking a fighting chance."

"This is an extraordinary list of bankruptcy professionals and we
are honored to be included," said Wang-Ekvall.

Andrassy's insolvency-related work includes representing
chapter 11 debtors, chapter 7 and chapter 11 trustees, secured and
unsecured creditors, creditors' committees, purchasers of assets
from bankruptcy estates, assignees in assignments for the benefit
of creditors, federal and state court receivers, and borrowers in
out-of-court workouts. She currently serves as Co-Chair of the
Insolvency Law Committee of the Business Law Section of the
California Lawyers Association and Director of the Los
Angeles/Orange County Chapter of the California Receivers Forum and
the Southern California Chapter of the International Women's
Insolvency & Restructuring Confederation. Andrassy is a past
president of the Orange County Bankruptcy Forum.

Wang-Ekvall has focused her practice around bankruptcy and
insolvency since 1992. She is currently serving as the Vice-Chair
of the Central District of California Attorney Discipline
Committee. She is also a board member of the Federal Bar
Association, Orange County Chapter; the Masters Division of the
Orange County Bar Association; Community Legal Services SoCal; the
Orange County Bar Association Charitable Fund; and the Los Angeles
Bankruptcy Forum. She is a past president and director of the
Orange County Bar Association, the Orange County Bankruptcy Forum
and the Orange County Asian American Bar Association, and she has
served as a co‑chair and member of the Central District of
California Lawyer Representatives to the Ninth Circuit Judicial
Conference. Wang-Ekvall was recognized as the 2019 Attorney of the
Year by the Orange County Women Lawyers Association and was the
recipient of the 2015 Peter M. Elliott Award presented by the
Orange County Bankruptcy Forum. She is a frequent speaker on
bankruptcy, insolvency, assignment for benefit of creditors, and
receiverships.

Lawdragon magazine is a trusted legal publication known for its
annual attorney listings. Each year, the staff at Lawdragon compile
nominations from leading lawyers across the country and submit
candidates to a thorough vetting process that includes peer review
and independent research. The result is a list of attorneys who've
experienced verifiable success, as well as the respect and esteem
of their professional colleagues and the communities they serve.

Smiley | Wang-Ekvall -- http://swelawfirm.com/-- achieves
unparalleled results for its clients in the areas of business
litigation, real estate transactions, and bankruptcy and insolvency
matters, combining the hands-on attention and cost-effectiveness of
a small firm with the depth and breadth of experience of a large
firm.



[*] Will Bankruptcies Rise Further Amid COVID-19 Concerns?
----------------------------------------------------------
Nikita Kataruka, writing for Zacks, wrote that The coronavirus
pandemic has hit companies from almost all sectors across the
globe. Since the virus outbreak in mid-March, there has hardly been
any business sector that has not had to bear the brunt of the
crisis.

In fact, of all the sectors that have been adversely impacted, the
retail industry (except those having strong online presence),
restaurants, real estate industry, finance industry, gyms, cruise
and airline industry are a few that are expected to face
consequences in the next couple of quarters as well.

Apart from these, the oil and gas industry is amongst the many that
have been hit hardest. In addition to the uncertainty resulting
from the pandemic, a plunge in oil prices (due to oversupply and
low prices) has become a major concern for energy companies.

In fact, the imposition of lockdown across the globe and the
resulting halt in business activities in the first half of this
year forced many companies in the United States to file for
bankruptcy, despite the introduction of the Paycheck Protection
Program ("PPP") by the government. The PPP aims to keep small
businesses up and running with loans that can be converted to
grants if certain terms are met.

In the first half of this year, U.S. commercial chapter 11
bankruptcy filings increased 26% year over year, per the data
published by Epiq. With more companies seeking protection from
creditors during the pandemic, U.S. courts recorded 3,604 business
filings under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy code in the first six
months of 2020. In fact, last month, commercial chapter 11 filings
increased 43% from the year-ago period.

Of the many firms that have filed for bankruptcy in the United
States, some of the notable ones are Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
HTZ, Whiting Petroleum Corporation WLL, Quorum Health Corporation,
J.C. Penney and NPC International — the operator of various
franchisees of The Wendy's Company WEN.

In addition to the coronavirus-led market turmoil, high debt level
is another reason that has forced many companies to file for
bankruptcy. Due to the extraordinarily low interest rates, majority
of companies in the United States now have very high levels of
debt. And, given the current crisis, the companies are not even
being able to make timely interest payments and hence are having to
file for reorganization under chapter 11.

However, to our respite, the current situation is not as bad as the
2008 financial crisis. This is because, companies now, especially
finance sector firms, are comparatively sound with strong liquidity
position than they were back then.

In fact, the Federal Reserve has been taking stimulus measures to
inject liquidity into the economy and help companies remain
operational. Also, with businesses opening up slowly, the situation
is expected to improve in the latter half of this year.

However, until the invention of a vaccine, there cannot be any
certainty regarding the virus and its outcome. Also, there might be
a time when the government's stimulus packages dry up or get
exhausted. If till then the impact of the virus continues the way
it is now, businesses will continue to be affected. That might
result in an increase in bankruptcy filings, thus, disrupting the
overall health of the economy.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***