/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/200302.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, March 2, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 61

                            Headlines

2300 PISANI: Hajbi Offers $3 Million for Venice Property
27 PUTNAM AVE: May Obtain DIP Funds from Clinton Senior Note Buyer
27 PUTNAM AVE: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral Thru August 2020
344 SOUTH STREET: April 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
900 CESAR CHAVEZ: Rastegar Buying All 7400 South's Assets for $9.8M

900 CESAR CHAVEZ: Sets Sales Procedures for All Assets
929485 FLORIDA: March 13 Plan & Disclosure Extension Hearing Set
AERO-MARINE: Exclusivity Period Extended Until March 5
AIRCRAFT SOLUTIONS: Chapter 15 Case Summary
AKORN INC: Incurs $226.8 Million Net Loss in 2019

ALTA MESA: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Through April 30
AMERICANN INC: JV Partner Starts Operations at MCC Building 1
APG SUBS: March 11 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
APG SUBS: Still In Talks With Wyatt-Burrows and Bank
APPLETON EXCHANGE: Bosco Buying Holyoke Property for $800K

ASP NAPA: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-'; Outlook Negative
ASPEN LANDSCAPING: Unsecureds Get 90% Dividend in Plan
ATLAS INTERMEDIATE: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR; Outlook Stable
BL RESTAURANTS: Russell R. Johnson III Represents Utility Companies
BRINK'S CO: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB+' ICR

BRINK'S COMPANY: Moody's Affirms Ba1 CFR & Alters Outlook to Neg.
BROWNIE'S MARINE: Receives $125K From Partial Exercise of Warrant
C&S WHOLESALE: S&P Affirms 'B+' ICR, Ratings Off Watch Negative
CALFRAC WELL: S&P Raises ICR to 'CCC-' After Debt Exchange
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Reports $28 Million Net Loss for 2019

CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: S&P Affirms 'B' First-Lien Loan Rating
CANCER GENETICS: Court Dismisses Class Action Suit Pending in N.J.
CAPSTONE LOGISTICS: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR on Refinancing
CARMEL MEDICAL: CIBM Objects to Debtor's Disclosure Statement
CARMEL MEDICAL: Debtor Objects to CIBM Plan Disclosures

CARMEL MEDICAL: Vasey Heating Objects to CIMB Disclosure Statement
CELLA III: Girod LoanCo Says Plan Not Confirmable
CELLA III: US Trustee Seeks Details of Equity Contribution in Plan
CHHATRALA GRAND: Unsecureds to Get $25K from $11M Sale
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC: Moody's Confirms B1 CFR, Outlook Negative

COASTAL HOME: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 16% Under Plan
CONTURA ENERGY: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3 & Alters Outlook to Neg.
COOK & BOARDMAN: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating on New $25MM Term Loan
CREATIVE GLOBAL: Seeks to Borrow from CEO on Unsecured Basis
CTI INDUSTRIES: Amends Purchase Agreement with LF International

CUMBERLAND BEHAVIOR: Addresses Objections to Plan Docs
DAK RESOURCES: Case Summary & 19 Unsecured Creditors
DANCOR TRANSIT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DIAMOND PERFECTION: April 14 Filing of Plan and Disclosures
DIOCESE OF BUFFALO: 2nd in NY to Fall Due to Child Victims Act

DIOCESE OF BUFFALO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DIOCESE OF BUFFALO: Facing Abuse Claims From 400+ Individuals
DONALD B. BURNHAM: Tosi Trust Buying North Port Property for $154K
DPW HOLDINGS: Agrees to Settle Derivative Action Pending in Calif.
DUFF & PHELPS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-' on Leveraged Buyout

DUNCAN MORGAN: Trustee Objects to MacGregor's Plan Disclosures
DURR MECHANICAL: Plan Solicitation Period Extended to May 11
EARTH FARE: Russell R. Johnson III Represents Utility Companies
ECOARK HOLDINGS: Michael Green Quits as Director
EDGEWELL PERSONAL: S&P Ups ICR to BB on Termination of Merger Deal

EKSO BIONICS: Incurs $12.1 Million Net Loss in 2019
ELEFTHERIA LLC: Kirama Offers Trustee $760K for Memphis Property
ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS: Closes $600K Sale Agreement with Nostrum
EMPRESA LOCAL: Disclosure Statement Hearing Reset to May 13
EPIC COMPANIES: To Seek Plan Confirmation on April 1

EQM MIDSTREAM: Moody's Lowers CFR to Ba2, Outlook Remains Negative
ERNEST VICKNAIR: Disbursing Agent Selling Houma Property for $20K
EVERGREEN PALLET: March 26 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
FAIRWAY GROUP: Sets Store Closing Procedures
FEMUR BUYER: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Negative

FERRO CORP: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
FIRST QUANTUM: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Alters Outlook to Negative
FLOYD SQUIRES: Liquidating Agent Selling Samoa Property for $77.5K
FORTVILLE APARTMENTS: Seeks Cash Access Thru May 2020
FROG POND GRADING: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis

GENCANNA GLOBAL: Farmer & Wright Represents Suppliers
GENCANNA GLOBAL: Morgan Pottinger Represents Trade Companies
GENCANNA GLOBAL: Neely Brien Represents Jill Coffey, 11 Others
GENERAL NUTRITION: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa1, Outlook Negative
GENESIS CARE: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B'; Outlook Negative

GFL ENVIRONMENTAL: S&P Puts 'B' ICR on Watch Positive on IPO Launch
GL BRANDS: Accell Audit Replaces Sadler Gibb as Accountants
GLENVIEW HEALTH: Monticello Banking Objects to Disclosure Statement
GMJ MACHINE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
GRANITE LAKES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

H&F MANAGEMENT: Gets Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
H.R.P. II: Lake County Treasurer Objects to Disclosures & Plan
HESTON HAULING: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
IDC ENTERPRISES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS: Signs $2M Securities Purchase Pact with Triton

INNOVIVA INC: S&P Withdraws 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating
ION GEOPHYSICAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg., Affirms 'CCC+' ICR
IOWA FERTILIZER: S&P Raises Debt Rating to 'BB-'; Outlook Stable
JACK COUNTY HOSPITAL: Chapter 9 Case Summary & 16 Unsec. Creditors
JAGUAR HEALTH: Obtains $317,000 From Warrants Exercise

JAS EXPEDITED: Judge Denies Bid to Extend Time to Confirm Plan
JAY D. SEXTON: Selling Four Tucson Condo Units
JOSEPH'S TRANSPORTATION: May Continue Access to Cash Until April 30
JUST ONE MORE: May Borrow More Than $5.5M from SF V CLE Lending
LANDSTREET PROJECT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

LD INTERMEDIATE: Moody's Confirms Caa1 CFR, Outlook Stable
LIZZA EQUIPMENT: Has Until May 1 to File Plan & Disclosure
LUCID ENERGY: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
M & H PINE STRAW: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
M M & D HARVESTING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

MAGNOLIA PROPERTIES: Has $325K Offer for Mobile Property
MAJUANNA WALKER: Selling Plant City Property
MEDNAX INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB' ICR
MELINTA THERAPEUTICS: Unsecureds to Get Recovery in Revised Plan
MESA MARKETPLACE: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral

MODERN RADIOLOGY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
MOTHERS TOUCH: Court Confirms Reorganization Plan
MTE HOLDINGS: Potter Anderson 3rd Update on Service Providers
MURRAY ENERGY: Bailey, Steptoe, and Mooney Represent Benefit Fund
NANOMECH INC: Delays Filing of Plan to Pursue Avoidance Actions

NEPHROS INC: Incurs $3.18 Million Net Loss in 2019
NEW ENERGY: Needs More Time to Complete Plan Negotiations
NEW WAY INVESTMENTS: March 26 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
NEWBRIDGE ON CHARLES: Fitch Affirm BB+ Rating on $236MM 2017 Bonds
NOVAN INC: Sabby Volatility, et al. Have 7.5% Stake as of Feb. 28

OBALON THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $23.7 Million Net Loss in 2019
OFFSHORE MARINE: May Borrow Up to $25K from AMEX on Revolving Basis
PANKEY'S TRANSPORTATION: Obtains Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
PENNRIVER COMMUNITY: Files Second Motion to Use Cash Collateral
PG&E CORP: Subrogation Claimants Update Holdings for 6th Time

PIER 1 IMPORTS: Brown, Whiteford Represent Term Lender Group
PITBULL REALTY: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Thru April 30
PLATINUM GROUP: Reports Waterberg Project Funding by Implats
PONCE REAL ESTATE: Triangle REO Objects to Disclosure Statement
PRINCETON AVENUE: 5% Shareholders Object to Disclosure Statement

PROTEC INSTRUMENT: Unsecureds to Get Up to 100% in 6 Years
QMAXX PRODUCTS: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
RANCHO CIELO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
RENNOVA HEALTH: Christopher Diamantis Quits as Director
REVA MEDICAL: Seeks Plan & Disclosures Approval

RHETT RANCE: Perkins Coie Represents Alpine Investors, 2 Others
RODRIGUEZ CANO: Disclosure Statement Conditionally Approved
RUBY PIPELINE: S&P Cuts ICR to BB on Increased Recontracting Risk
SABRE CORP: S&P Puts 'BB' Issuer Credit Rating on Watch Negative
SANAM CONYERS: To Seek Approval of Amended Plan March 26

SARAH AIR: Trustee Selling Aircraft to Wright for $345K
SARAH ZONE: Seeks Access to Cash Collateral Thru July 12
SAUK PRAIRIE: Moody's Alters Outlook on $38MM 2013A Bonds to Pos.
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS: S&P Rates New $600MM Term Loan 'BB+'
SHAPPHIRE RESOURCES: Disclosure Statement Hearing Reset to April 29

SOUTHERN ILLINOIS FAMILY: March 31 Disclosure Hearing Set
SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR, Outlook Negative
STAK DESIGN: Has Final Approval to Use Cash Collateral
TENNECO INC: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B+'; Outlook Stable
TRANSMONTAIGNE PARTNERS: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR; Outlook Stable

TUPPERWARE BRANDS: Moody's Lowers Sr. Unsec. Rating to B1
TUPPERWARE BRANDS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'B'; Ratings on Watch Negative
VALADOR INC: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Through April 30
VARTEK LLC: Gets Approval to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
VCHP NEPTUNE: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors

VCHP SPRINGFIELD: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
VESTCOM PARENT: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
VETERANS FELLOWSHIP: Given Until Aug. 16 to Confirm Chapter 11 Plan
VIP CINEMA: S&P Lowers ICR to 'D' on Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing
WATERS RETAIL: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

WELBILT INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB-' ICR
WW INTERNATIONAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'B+' ICR
ZDN INC: Files Amended Cash Collateral Motion
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from February 24 to 28, 2020

                            *********

2300 PISANI: Hajbi Offers $3 Million for Venice Property
--------------------------------------------------------
2300 Pisani, A Nevada Domestic Limited Liability Company, filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California a notice of its proposed private sale of the real
property located at 2300 Pisani Pl., Venice, California to Kfir
Hajbi for $3 million, pursuant to their fully executed California
Residential Property Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow
Instructions, dated Jan. 13, 2020.

The Property is a double that includes a main house and guest
house, with a total of 1,805 sq feet, four bedrooms and three
baths.  It is located just off Venice Blvd between Abbott Kinney
and Lincoln Blvd., which is a very popular area less than a mile
from the Venice Boardwalk.  

The Debtor purchased the Property in 2016 with the intention of
demolishing the existing structures and building three, three-story
condominium units with three roof decks and a subterranean garage
totaling 8,575 sq. ft.  After the purchase, the Debtor maintained
the Property while working with architects and engineers on the
design and seeking approval from the City of Los Angeles,
Department of City Planning and the Coastal Commission which
resulted in incurring considerable additional expenses.  

The Property was listed for sale for a couple months last summer
with a purchase price of $3,795,000.  It was very overpriced.  The
Property went into foreclosure and was scheduled for sale two weeks
after this case was filed.  In filing the case, the Debtor decided
it would be in its best interest and that of creditors to sell the
Property through the Bankruptcy Court.  It retained a local real
estate agent familiar with properties in the same area who
apparently considered the value of the comparable properties pined
the value was approximately $2.5 million.  However, given the
amount of liens on the Property it could not sell for less than $3
million.  It was selected as the listing price as it was not likely
there would be any interest in the Property at any higher than
this amount.  

The sale that is the subject of the Motion is for the full amount
of the list price of $3 million, which is over the market price.
This offer, accepted by the Debtor, was made by Buyer, an
investor/creditor of the Debtor, who was involved in the
development project and made the offer to assure he can recoup at
least some of his investment.  

The Debtor proposes to sell the Property to the Buyer free and
clear of all liens, claims, rights, interests, and encumbrances.
The RPPA was presented to the Debtor and accepted on Jan. 11, 2020.
The Purchase Price is $3 million with the Buyer and the parties to
pay their own escrow fees.  

The terms of the sale include, without limitation, the following:

     (1) The purchase price of $3 milion is inclusive of
commissions and administrative fees and payable by and a loan in
the amount of $2.45 million due before the closing date of escrow
and a credit by the Buyer who is also the third lienholder in an
amount as necessary up to the amount of his lien in the amount of
$850,000;

     (2) The escrow for the sale of the Property will close within
14 days after entry of a bankruptcy court order approving the
sale;

     (3) The Property is being sold on an "as is, where is" basis,
without any representations, warranties, recourse or contingencies
of any kind whatsoever;

     (4) The Buyer agrees to inspect the Property and make himself
aware of any and all defects during the Buyer’s contingency
period;

     (5) The Buyer warrants his financial resources are as
represented;  

     (6) In the event the sale is not consummated, the sole remedy
of the Buyer will be the full refund of any money deposited or
credited towards the purchase of the Property.

     (7) The sale is subject to Bankruptcy Court approval after
providing notice to the Debtor and its' counsel, the United States
Trustee, all creditors, and other parties in interests as required
by the Bankruptcy Code, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and
the Local Bankruptcy Rules.

     (8)  There are no remaining contingencies, except Bankruptcy
Court approval.

No liabilities will be assumed by the Buyer.  All liabilities
against the Property will be paid in full by the $3 million sale
proceeds and/or Buyer's credit.  The Buyer has not paid a deposit
as his $850,000 third lien is being used as his down
payment/credit.

The RRPA and Addendum No. 1 acknowledge that approval of the Court
is required and provides that escrow will close 14 days after entry
of the Court order of approval.  There are no Buyer contingencies
in the RRPA.  There is, therefore, no impediment to closing.  

The proposed sale is free and clear of liens and encumbrances.    

The liens affecting the Property are:

     a. 1st Deed of Trust -  Center Street Lending Corp --
$2,050,000

     b. 2nd Deed of Trust - Jacqueline Stein - $200,000

     c. 3rd Deed of Trust - Kfir Hajbi -- $850,000

     d. 4th Deed of Trust – Eli Cohens -- $70,000

     e. Tax Lien - LA Property Taxes -- $104,541

However, each creditor should make a demand into escrow for the
current amount owed.  The current value of the Property is closer
to $2.5 million which considerably less than the purchase price.
The sale is in the best interests of the estate and will pay off
all creditors and costs of sale, and allowing Debtor to dismiss the
case as there are no unsecured creditors.  The Debtor does not
believe an overbid is needed as the Property is not likely to
receive any offers sufficient to recover all the liens and costs.
The real estate commission in the listing agreement provides for 5%
commission of the sale split between seller's and buyer's
agents/brokers. However, the sale involves a single agent and
broker and they have agreed to take only one share of the
commission which is 2.5%.  

The proposed sale to the Buyer pursuant to the terms of the RRPA is
for a private sale.  The purchase price is already substantially
over the market price and of substantial benefit as the Buyer has a
credit for the amount of his lien but will have to reduce the
credit significantly in order to assure all creditors are paid.  It
is not likely there are any potential purchasers willing to this
much over the already above market price.

The Motion is filed pursuant to LBR 6004(c).  The Debtor does not
anticipate any objections as all creditors will be paid from the
sale.

In order to complete the sale in the case, and to not miss the
opportunity presented by the sale to Debtor, the estate and its
creditors, the Debtor respectfully asks that the order on the
Motion be effective immediately, notwithstanding the 14-day stay
imposed by FRBP 6004(h).

A hearing on the Motion is set for Feb. 20, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.

A copy of the Agreement is available at https://tinyurl.com/qsm4gth
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

              About 2300 Pisani, A Nevada Domestic
                   Limited Liability Company

2300 Pisani, A Nevada Domestic LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 20-10057) on Jan. 10, 2020,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by Michael Totaro, Esq., at Totaro &
Shanahan.


27 PUTNAM AVE: May Obtain DIP Funds from Clinton Senior Note Buyer
------------------------------------------------------------------
27 Putnan Ave LP and debtor affiliates seek permission from the
Bankruptcy Court to obtain DIP financing from DS-CREF3 Clinton
Senior Note Buyer LLC of up to $180,045 on an interim basis and
$614,475 on a final basis, in accordance with the budgets.  

The interest rate on the DIP loan will be a per annum rate equal to
LIBOR plus a spread of 9.6833%.  Default interest will be the
non-default interest rate plus 5%.  The loan will mature on
December 31, 2020.

To secure the DIP Obligations, the DIP lender will be granted valid
and fully perfected liens upon and senior security interests in all
the Debtors' assets, subject only to the carve-out.  The liens will
be given super administrative priority, ahead of all liens other
than the liens of the existing mortgage loans.

The carve-out includes amounts for (a) Chapter 7 trustee in the
amount of $2,500 on an interim basis and $10,000 on a final basis,
(b) fees due to the Clerk of the Court and the Office of the United
States Trustee, plus interest pursuant to Section 3717 of title 31
of the U.S. Code, and  (c) for allowed unpaid fees and expenses of
professionals retained by Debtors.

The DIP lender holds a first mortgage on certain of the Debtors'
property amounting to $29,312,995 against each of the four Debtors:
(i) 27 Putnam Ave LP , (ii) 423 Grand Ave LP, (iii) 429 Grand Ave
LP, and (iv) 90 Downing St LP.

A copy of the DIP motion is available free of charge at
https://is.gd/LSsKeO from PacerMonitor.com.

Hearing on the motion is scheduled on March 3, 2020 at 10 a.m.

                      About 27 Putnam Ave LP

27 Putnam Ave LP and three affiliates concurrently filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-13412) on Oct. 25, 2019.  The
petitions were signed by David Schieble, Clinton Hill GP LLC,
authorized signatory.

At the time of the filing, each Debtor disclosed assets of between
$10 million and $50 million and liabilities of the same range.

The case is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil.  

Mark A. Frankel, Esq. at Backenroth Frankel & Krinsky, LLP, is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


27 PUTNAM AVE: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral Thru August 2020
------------------------------------------------------------
27 Putnam Ave LP and debtor affiliates seek approval from the
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California to use
cash collateral through August 2020, pursuant to the budget.
DS-CREF3 Clinton Senior Note Buyer LLC, as mortgagee, has interest
in the cash collateral.

The Debtor proposes to grant mortgagee an automatically perfected
lien and security interest in certain signature accounts and any
other account not previously subject to the mortgagee's liens, if
any, and all cash maintained in said signature account or other
accounts.

As adequate protection, the Debtor also proposes to grant mortgagee
replacement liens and security interests on all assets of the
Debtors and their estates, subordinate to the carve-out, to secure
any diminution of value in the mortgagee’s collateral from and
after the Petition Date.

Pursuant to the loan documents, DS-CREF3 Clinton Senior Note Buyer
LLC holds a first mortgage against Debtors (i) 27 Putnam Ave LP ,
(ii) 423 Grand Ave LP, (iii) 429 Grand Ave LP, and (iv) 90 Downing
St LP each for $29,312,995 with respect to their interest in the
apartment building located in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn.

Hearing on the motion is scheduled on March 3, 2020 at 10 a.m.

                   About 27 Putnam Ave LP

27 Putnam Ave LP and three affiliates concurrently filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-13412) on Oct. 25, 2019.  The
petitions were signed by David Schieble, Clinton Hill GP LLC,
authorized signatory.  At the time of the filing, each Debtor
disclosed assets of between $10 million and $50 million and
liabilities of the same range.  The case is assigned to Judge Mary
Kay Vyskocil.  Mark A. Frankel, Esq. at Backenroth Frankel &
Krinsky, LLP, is the Debtor's legal counsel.




344 SOUTH STREET: April 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
convened a hearing to consider the motion of Debtor 344 South
Street Corporation for approval of disclosure statement, plan
voting materials and plan voting procedures.

On Feb. 13, 2020, Judge Eric L. Frank granted the motion and
ordered that:

  * The Debtor's Disclosure Statement is approved.

  * March 20, 2020, at 5:00 p.m. is fixed as the deadline by which
ballots must be received in order to be considered as acceptances
or rejections of the Plan.

  * March 24, 2020, is fixed as the date by which the Debtor shall
file the Report of Plan Voting.

  * March 27, 2020, is fixed as the deadline for filing and serving
written objections to the confirmation of the Plan.

  * April 1, 2020, at 11:00 a.m., is fixed as the date and time for
the hearing on confirmation of the Plan, to be held at the United
States Bankruptcy Court, Courtroom No. 1, 900 Market Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19107.

A copy of the order dated Feb. 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/wfqpf7m from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                     About 344 South Street

344 South Street Corp. has operated as a restaurant, serving
Spanish and Mexican cuisine in Philadelphia's South Street
District.

344 South Street Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Court (Bankr. E.D. Penn. Case No. 15-18278) on Nov. 17,
2015, and is represented by Raheem S. Watson, Esq., at Watson LLC,
in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor was estimated assets and liabilities below $500,000.


900 CESAR CHAVEZ: Rastegar Buying All 7400 South's Assets for $9.8M
-------------------------------------------------------------------
7400 South Congress, LLC, an affiliate of 900 Cesar Chavez, LLC,
asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas to
authorize the bidding procedures in connection with the sale of
substantially all assets to Rastegar Property Co., LLC for $9.75
million, subject to overbid.

The Debtor's assets primarily consist of the following parcel of
real property: 7400 South Congress, LLC owns a three-parcel
property combining to form a 7.5 acre (327,775 SF) development site
located on South Congress Avenue.  A recent appraisal of 7400 S.
Congress concluded that the appraisal value is $5.18 million.

By separate motion, the Debtor has sought Court approval for the
retention of McAllister & Associates to act as the exclusive broker
for the sale of the Property.

The Debtor believes that a competitive sales process should realize
the highest and best value for the Property.  It asks that it be
permitted to remit the net sales proceeds to ATX Lender 5, LLC at
closing to be credited against the claim of the Lender as
determined by the Court.

A listing agreement has been entered into for the marketing of the
Property.  Additionally, since the time of filing of these chapter
11 cases, the Debtors have received numerous expressions of
interest in the Property, though no expressions of interest to date
have exceeded the value of the Modified Rastegar Contract.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor had entered into a sales
contract with Rastegar for the sale of the Property for a purchase
price of $10 million.  The Debtor, has entered into a modified
agreement with Rastegar pursuant to which it would serve as
stalking horse purchaser  for the Property; the Modified Rastegar
Contract is non-contingent and provides for the sale of the
Property 45 days from the Court’s approval of the Bidding
Procedures.

The Modified Rastegar Contract provides as follows:

     a) Purchase Price: $9,750,000

     b) $500,000 non-refundable deposit

     c) Buyer Protections: 2.5% Break Up Fee; $100,000 expense
reimbursement

     d) Conditions: None.

     e) Closing: On the 45th day after entry of the Bidding
Procedures Order

The Debtor proposes the approval of the Modified Rastegar Contract
as the Stalking Horse Purchaser for 7400 S. Congress and that it be
authorized to establish a procedure for the sale of the Property as
an all cash sale, on an AS-IS basis, with the successful bidder to
assume all closing costs, including the costs associated with any
title policy, and that the closing occur within 45 days or less of
the date when the Purchaser is approved by the Court.  

The Debtor proposes that the proceeds of the sale be disbursed at
the time of closing for the payment of taxes in respect of the
Property, and against the liens asserted in the order of priority,
but with all monies that might be payable to parties asserting
disputed liens (if any) to be retained or escrowed pending
resolution of the lien disputes or claims.  No entities affiliated
with or individuals related to the Debtor will participate as
potential bidders.

In the event that Debtor obtains Qualified Bids in addition to the
Stalking Horse Purchaser, it proposes an Auction of the Property
five business days before the 45th ay from the Court's approval of
the Bid Procedures, such Auction to be conducted in open Court.  
The Debtor proposes to conduct the Sale Hearing with any Qualified
Bidders allowed to participate with the highest bidder being
determined by the Debtor in consultation with the Broker.  The
Debtor may adjourn the Sale Hearing at any time in its discretion
without further notice.  If no other Qualified Bids are received,
the Debtor, it its sole discretion, may request that the Court set
a Sale Hearing at any time following the expiration of the Bid
Deadline.

In the event that the Lender's credit bid is selected as the
highest and best offer and Lender is deemed the Purchaser at the
Auction, the Debtor requests that the Court require the Lender to
include a sufficient cash bid with its credit bid to satisfy the
Bid Protections afforded to the Stalking Horse Purchaser.  Any
amount of Bid Protections paid by Lender pursuant to the Bid
Procedures Order will then been added to the balance of the loan
balance of the Debtor.

By the Motion, the Debtor asks entry of the Bid Procedures Order,
which will, among other things, establish the following timeline:

     a. Granting of Bid Procedures Motion - Feb. 7, 2020

     b. Prepare/Finalize Marketing Materials/Populate Data Room -
The later of Feb. 14, 2020 or within one week of entry of order
granting bidding procedures

     c. Marketing Period - January 31, 2020 through date of Auction


     d. Deadline to Serve Sale Notice and Form Sales Contract - The
later of Feb. 10, 2020 or three calendar days following entry of
order granting bidding procedures

     e. Competing Bid Deadline - 30 days following the approval of
the Stalking Horse Purchaser

     f. Sale Objection Deadline - Two business days prior to Sale
Hearing

     g. Auction (if required)/Selection of Final Bid - either with
Stalking Horse or proceeding with No Floor Bid and Sale Hearing -
Five business days following the Competing Bid Deadline  

     h. Notice of Assumption and Assignment - Five business days
following Auction

     i. Deadline to File Auction Results Within five business days
following Auction

     j. Entry of Sale Order Within five business days following
Auction

     k. Consummation of Sale - Within 10 days of the Auction with
an additional 10 days if to a Back-Up Bidder

     l. Assumption and Assignment Objection Deadline - Five
business days following filing and service of the Notice of
Assumption and Assignment  

     m. Hearing to Determine Objections to Assumption and
Assignment of Executory Contracts - Five business days following
the Assumption and Assignment Objection Deadline

Other key terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Initial Bid - Qualified Bidders may then submit successive
bids higher than previous bid, based on and increased from the
Initial Highest Bid, in increments of $50,000

     b. Good Faith Deposit - $500,000

     c. Bid Increments - $50,000

To facilitate the Sale Transaction, the Debtor proposes procedures
for notifying counterparties to executory contracts and unexpired
leases of potential cure amounts in the event the Debtor decides to
assume and assign such contracts or leases.  Three business days
after the Auction, the Debtor will file with the Court and serve on
all Contract Notice Parties a notice of assumption, assignment and
sale.  

Within two business days after entry of the Bid Procedures Order,
the Debtor (or their agents) will provide notice of the Bid
Procedures Order, the Motion, the Auction, the Objection Deadlines,
and the Sale Hearing upon all the Sale Notice Parties.

The Debtor also asks that the Court authorizes the Sale of the
Property free and clear of any and all Interests, which may be
asserted or otherwise exist, with any such Interests to attach to
the proceeds of the Sale of the Property.

To preserve the value of the Debtor's estate and limit the costs of
administering and preserving the Property, it is critical that the
Debtor close the sale of the Property as soon as possible af ter
all closing conditions have been met or waived.  Accordingly, the
Debtor asks that the Court waives the 14-day stay periods under
Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).

A copy of the Agreement and the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/u2h5xpv from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About 900 Cesar Chavez

900 Cesar Chavez, LLC is engaged in renting and leasing real estate
properties.  The Debtors are Single Asset Real Estate entities (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

900 Cesar Chavez, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-11527), the
Lead Case, and its affiliates, 905 Cesar Chavez, LLC (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Case No. 19-11528), 5th and Red River, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-11529), and 7400 South Congress, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-11530), sought Chapter 11 protection on Nov. 4, 2019.
The cases are assigned to Judge Tony M. Davis.

In the petition signed by Brian Elliott, corporate counsel, 900
Cesar Chavez, LLC, was estimated to have assets in the range of $1
million to $10 million, and $10 million to $50 million in debt.

The Debtors tapped Evan J. Atkinson, Esq., and Morris D. Weiss,
Esq., at Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis LLP as counsel.


900 CESAR CHAVEZ: Sets Sales Procedures for All Assets
------------------------------------------------------
900 Cesar Chavez, LLC, 905 Cesar Chavez, LLC and 5th and Red River,
LLC, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Texas to authorize the bidding procedures in connection with the
auction sale of substantially all assets.

The Debtors' assets primarily consist of the following parcels of
real property:

     a) 5th and Red River, LLC owns a 0.60 acre (26,508 SF)
development site located at the intersection of 5th Street & Red
River Street in the Central Business District of Austin, Texas;

     b) 900 Cesar Chavez, LLC owns 900 & 904 East Cesar Chavez
Street, a 0.56 acre (24,293 SF) parcel of undeveloped land located
in the rapidly-developing East Submarket of Austin, Texas; and

     c) 905 Cesar Chavez, LLC owns 905 & 907 East Cesar Chavez
Street, a 0.30 acre (13,016 SF) parcel of undeveloped land located
in the rapidly-developing East Submarket of Austin, Texas.

The estimated value of each Property owned by the Debtors, along
with the amount of the stalking horse bid for 7400 S. Congress:

    Owner     Net Book Value  Fair Market Value  Appraised  
               as Scheduled    as Scheduled      Value      

900 Cesar      $3,672,023      $5,000,000     $3,900,000
905 Cesar       $1,474,421      $2,600,000     $1,680,000
7400 S. Cong    $3,686,852     $10,000,000     $5,180,000
5th and Red    $16,320,124     $25,000,000    $20,890,000  
               -----------     -----------    -----------
    Total      $25,153,420     $42,350,000    $31,650,000

Under all scenarios, the Lender is significantly oversecured.  The
Debtors reserve the right to only sell sufficient Properties needed
to effectuate payment in full of the debt of the Lender.  

The Court has authorized the retention of McAllister & Associates
to act as the exclusive broker for the sale of each Property.

By the Motion, the Debtors ask to sell one or more of the
Properties.  They're not able to provide an estimate of the gross
proceeds anticipated from any such potential sale at this time.
Numerous parties have expressed an interest in one or more
Properties.  The Debtors believe that a competitive sales process
should realize the highest and best value for each Property.   

The Debtors believe that it is possible that the sale of fewer than
all of the Properties (along with the sale of the 7400 S. Congress
Property) could provide sufficient proceeds to satisfy the entire
first lien held by ATX Lender 5, LLC.  The Debtors ask that they be
permitted to remit the net sales proceeds to the Lender at closing
to be credited against the claim of the Lender, as determined by
the Court.  Because the sale of all of the Properties will likely
not be necessary to satisfy the first lien held by the Lender, the
Debtors reserve the right to withdraw any of the Properties from
the sale process at their discretion and without prior Court
approval.

The Debtors propose that they be authorized to establish a
procedure for the sale of each Property as an all cash sale (or
series of sales), on an "as is" basis, with the successful
bidder(s) to assume all closing costs, including the costs
associated with any title policy, and that the closing occur within
45 days or less of the date when such Purchaser is approved by the
Court.  They propose that the proceeds of the sale be disbursed at
the time of closing for the payment of taxes in respect of such
Property, and against the liens asserted in the order of priority,
but with all monies that might be payable to parties asserting
disputed liens (if any) to be retained or escrowed pending
resolution of the lien disputes or claims.  

No entities affiliated with or individuals related to the Debtors
will participate as potential bidders.  The Debtors, in
consultation with the Broker, will prepare a form sales contract,
which will be filed in the case and provided to all prospective
bidders in connection with a marketing process for the Properties.
The Debtors will entertain entering into an agreement with one or
more stalking horse purchaser(s), as may be determined by the
Debtors (in consultation with the Broker) in their business
judgment, for some or all of the Properties.  Any such proposed
Stalking Horse Agr eement would be with an entity that is
unaffiliated with the Debtors.  Any and all Potential Bidders
interested in becoming a Stalking Horse Purchaser must submit a
Qualified Bid6 (other than the requirement to submit a Modified
Sales Contract), by the later of March 27, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. or the
date that is 50 calendar days from entry of the order approving
this Motion.   

Upon the selection of a Stalking Horse Purchaser, the Debtors will
file and serve a notice.  The Debtors ask that the Court sets a
hearing following the selection of a stalking horse bidder, to
approve any such Stalking Horse Purchaser, Stalking Horse
Agreement, and accompanying Bid Protections on an expedited basis.
They ask that the Court sets a deadline for the filing of any
objections to the approval of any Stalking Horse Purchaser,
Stalking Horse Agreement, and Bid Protections no later three
calendar days before the Stalking Horse Hearing.   

In the event that the Debtors have not designated a Stalking Horse
Purchaser on or before the Stalking Horse Bid Deadline, the Debtors
reserve the right to designate a Stalking Horse Purchaser at a
later date. Should the Debtors designate a Stalking Horse Purchaser
following the expiration of the Stalking Horse Bid Deadline,
Debtors will file a notice with the Court and request that a
Stalking Horse Hearing be set on an expedited basis.  

In the event that the Lender's credit bid is selected as the
highest and best offer at an auction for a Property in which the
Debtors have secured a Stalking Horse Purchaser that has been
granted Bid Protections, the Debtors ask that the Court requires
the Lender to include a sufficient cash bid with its credit bid to
satisfy any Bid Protections afforded to any Stalking Horse
Purchaser. Any amount of Bid Protections paid by Lender pursuant to
the Bid Procedures Order will then be added to the balance of the
Debtors' loan balance.

By the Motion, the Debtor asks entry of the Bid Procedures Order,
which will, among other things, establish the following timeline:

     a. Granting of Bid Procedures Motion - Feb. 7, 2020

     b. Prepare/Finalize Marketing Materials/Populate Data Room -
The later of Feb. 14, 2020 or within one week of entry of order
granting bidding procedures

     c. Marketing Period - January 31, 2020 through date of Auction


     d. Deadline to Serve Sale Notice and Form Sales Contract - The
later of Feb. 10, 2020 or three calendar days following entry of
order granting bidding procedures

     e. Stalking Horse Bid Deadline - The later of March 27, 2020
or 50 days following entry of order approving bidding procedures

     f. Stalking Horse Designation Deadline - The later of March
30, 2020 or three calendar days following the Stalking Horse Bid
Deadline

     g. Stalking Horse Objection Deadline - The later of April 2,
2020, 2020 or three calendar days following the Stalking Horse
Designation Deadline

     h. Stalking Horse Hearing (if required) - Three business day
following the Stalking Horse Objection Deadline  

     i. Competing Bid Deadline - The earlier of 21 days following
the approval of the Stalking Horse Purchaser or April 17, 2020, or
in the event no Stalking Horse

     j. Notification of Qualified Bids - No later than five
business days after Competing Bid Deadline

     k. Sale Objection Deadline - Two business days prior to Sale
Hearing  

     l. Auction (if required)/Selection of Final Bid - either with
Stalking Horse or proceeding with No Floor Bid and Sale Hearing -
Five business days following the notification of Qualified Bids

     m. Notice of Assumption and Assignment - One week following
the Auction

     n. Deadline to File Auction Results - One week following the
Auction

     o. Entry of Sale Order - One week following the Auction

     p. Consummation of Sale - On or before 10 calendar days
following the Auction

     q. Assumption and Assignment Objection Deadline - One week
following the filing and service of the Notice of Assumption and
Assignment

     r. Hearing to Determine Objections to Assumption and
Assignment of Executory Contracts - One week following the
Assumption and Assignment Objection Deadline

Other key terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Initial Bid - Qualified Bidders may then submit successive
bids higher than previous bid, based on and increased from the
Initial Highest Bid, in increments of $50,000

     b. Good Faith Deposit - No less than 2.5% of the purchase
price offered to purchase the Property (or Properties)

     c. Bid Increments - $50,000

To facilitate the Sale Transaction, the Debtor proposes procedures
for notifying counterparties to executory contracts and unexpired
leases of potential cure amounts in the event the Debtor decides to
assume and assign such contracts or leases.  Within one week
following the Auction, the Debtors will file with the Court and
serve the Contract Notice upon all Contract Notice Parties.

Within three calendar days after entry of the Bid Procedures Order,
the Debtors (or their agents) will provide the Sale Notice upon all
the Sale Notice Parties.

The Debtor also asks that the Court authorizes the Sale of the
Property free and clear of any and all Interests, which may be
asserted or otherwise exist, with any such Interests to attach to
the proceeds of the Sale of the Property.

To preserve the value of the Debtor's estate and limit the costs of
administering and preserving the Property, it is critical that the
Debtor close the sale of the Property as soon as possible after all
closing conditions have been met or waived.  Accordingly, the
Debtor asks that the Court waives the 14-day stay periods under
Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).

A copy of the Bidding Procedures is available at
https://tinyurl.com/rpnm373 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About 900 Cesar Chavez

900 Cesar Chavez, LLC, is engaged in renting and leasing real
estate properties.  The Debtors are Single Asset Real Estate
entities (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

900 Cesar Chavez, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-11527), the
Lead Case, and its affiliates, 905 Cesar Chavez, LLC (Bankr. W.D.
Tex. Case No. 19-11528), 5th and Red River, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-11529), and 7400 South Congress, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Tex.
Case No. 19-11530) sought Chapter 11 protection on Nov. 4, 2019.
The cases are assigned to Judge Tony M. Davis.

In the petition signed by Brian Elliott, corporate counsel, 900
Cesar Chavez was estimated to have assets in the range of $1
million to $10 million, and $10 million to $50 million in debt.

The Debtors tapped Evan J. Atkinson, Esq., and Morris D. Weiss,
Esq., at Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis LLP as counsel.


929485 FLORIDA: March 13 Plan & Disclosure Extension Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------------------
A preliminary hearing will be held on March 13, 2020, at 9:30 a.m.,
before the Honorable Caryl E. Delano at the Sam M. Gibbons United
States Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Avenue, Courtroom 9A, Tampa,
Florida, 33602, to consider the motion of Debtor for extension of
time to file Plan and Disclosure Statement.

A copy of the notice dated February 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/w443p64 from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

      Edmund S. Whitson, III, Esq.
      Adams and Reese LLP
      101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 4000
      Tampa, FL 33602
      Telephone: 813-402-2880
      Facsimile: 813-402-2887
      E-mail: edmund.whitson@arlaw.com

                      About 929485 Florida

929485 Florida, Inc., classifies its business as single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).
  
929485 Florida sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-09424) on Oct. 3, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of between $1
million and $10 million and liabilities of the same range.  The
case is assigned to Judge Caryl E. Delano.  The Debtor is
represented by Edmund S. Whitson, III, Esq., at Adams and Reese,
LLP.


AERO-MARINE: Exclusivity Period Extended Until March 5
------------------------------------------------------
Judge Caryl Delano of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida extended to March 5 the deadline for
Aero-Marine Technologies, Inc. to file its Chapter 11 plan and
disclosure statement.

The bankruptcy judge also extended to March 5 the period during
which only Aero-Marine can file a plan. The company has the
exclusive right to solicit votes until the conclusion of the
hearing on confirmation of the plan.

                  About Aero-Marine Technologies

Aero-Marine Technologies, Inc. --
https://www.aero-marinetechnologies.com/ -- provides total support
for waste and water system components found on Boeing, Airbus and
Embraer aircraft.  Aero-Marine Technologies is a full-service
Maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) with a worldwide customer
base.

Aero-Marine Technologies sought bankruptcy protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-07547) on
Aug. 9, 2019.  The Debtor's case is jointly administered with that
of Joseph N. Vaughn and Theresa L. Vaughn.

In the petition signed by Joseph N. Vaughn, president,
Aero-Marine's assets are estimated at $500,000 to $1 million, and
its liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Caryl E. Delano oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Stitchler, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A. as its
legal counsel, and Skoda Minotti & Co. as its accountant.


AIRCRAFT SOLUTIONS: Chapter 15 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------
Chapter 15 Debtor: Aircraft Solutions Lux V-B SARL
                   534, rue Neudorf
                   L-2220
                   Luxembourg

Description of
the Business:      One of the Debtor's business activities
                   included leasing aircrafts to third parties.  
                   One of the aircrafts suffered an engine
                   failure while leased to a tenant airline.  The
                   tenant airline successfully sued the Debtor.  
                   The amount of damages to the tenant exceeded
                   the Debtor's ability to pay.

Location of
Foreign Main
Proceeding:        Bankruptcy proceedings pending before 15th
                   Chamber of District Court of Luxembourg, Case
                   No. TAL-2019-04004

Chapter 15
Petition Date:     February 27, 2020

Court:             United States Bankruptcy Court
                   Southern District of Florida

Case No.:          20-12589

Foreign
Representative:    E2M SARL's Max Maillet, as bankruptcy
                   administrator

Chapter 15
Petitioner's
Counsel:           Arnoldo Lacayo, Esq.
                   SEQUOR LAW
                   Tel: (305) 372-8282
                   E-mail: alacayo@sequorlaw.com

Estimated Assets:  Unknown

Estimated Debt:    Unknown


AKORN INC: Incurs $226.8 Million Net Loss in 2019
-------------------------------------------------
Akorn, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission its
Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of $226.8 million
on $682.4 million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019,
compared to a net loss of $401.91 million on $694.02 million of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.

The decrease in net revenue in the period was primarily due to
$19.4 million and $4.2 million decline in discontinued products
revenue and organic revenue, respectively, partially offset by
$12.0 million increase in net revenue from new products.  The $19.4
million decline in discontinued products was primarily due to the
product Methylene Blue.  The $4.2 million decline in organic
revenue was due to approximately $81.1 million, or 12.2%, in volume
declines mostly offset by $76.9 million, or 11.6% of favorable
price variance primarily due to price increases on certain
exclusive products.  The volume decline was principally due to the
effect of competition on a number of products, including Amicar
Tablets, Fluticasone Rx, Nembutal and Clobetasol Cream as well as
supply shortfalls from the continued production ramp-up at the
Company's Somerset manufacturing facility.

Consolidated gross profit for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019 was
$252.7 million, or 37.0% of revenue, compared to $246.0 million, or
35.4% of revenue, for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The increase
in the gross profit percentage was principally due to favorable
price partially offset by unfavorable product mix and increased
costs associated with FDA compliance related improvement
activities.

GAAP net loss for 2019 was $(226.8) million, or $(1.80) per diluted
share, compared to net loss of $(401.9) million, or $(3.21) per
diluted share, for 2018.  After a net adjustment of $205.2 million
to net income for non-GAAP items, adjusted diluted earnings per
share for 2019 were $(0.17), compared to $(0.19) for 2018, after a
net adjustment of $378.2 million to net income for non-GAAP items.

EBITDA was $(148.1) million for 2019, compared to $(309.5) million
for 2018.  Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure used by
management to evaluate the performance of the Akorn business, was
$78.2 million for 2019, compared to $49.3 million for 2018.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $1.28 billion in total assets,
$1.05 billion in total liabilities, and $234.29 million in total
shareholders' equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Feb. 26, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net working capital deficiency
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.

                    Fourth Quarter 2019 Results

Akorn reported net revenue of $162.3 million for the three month
period ended Dec. 31, 2019, representing an increase of $8.9
million, or 5.8%, as compared to net revenue of $153.4 million for
the three month period ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The increase in net
revenue in the period was primarily due to increases of $8.7
million and $4.4 million in organic revenue and new products,
respectively, partially offset by a decline in discontinued
products revenue of $4.2 million.  The $8.7 million increase in
organic revenue was due to approximately $14.5 million, or 9.8% of
favorable price variance primarily due to price increases on
certain exclusive products partially offset by $5.8 million, or
3.9% in volume decline.  The volume decline was principally due to
the effect of competition on a number of products, including
Myorisan and Amicar Tablets.

Consolidated gross profit for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2019 was
$59.8 million, or 36.9% of net revenue, compared to $25.2 million,
or 16.5% of net revenue, in the corresponding prior year quarter.
The increase in the gross profit percentage was principally due to
favorable price and decreased costs associated with FDA compliance
related improvement activities, partially offset by unfavorable
product mix.

GAAP net loss for the fourth quarter 2019 was $(80.7) million, or
$(0.64) per diluted share, compared to GAAP net loss of $(215.0)
million, or $(1.71) per diluted share, in the same quarter of 2018.
Including a net adjustment of $71.9 million to net income for
non-GAAP items, adjusted diluted earnings per share for the fourth
quarter 2019 were $(0.07), compared to $(0.29) in the same quarter
2018, after a net adjustment of $179.2 million to net income for
non-GAAP items.

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA) was $(42.5) million for the fourth quarter 2019, compared
to $(174.1) million for the fourth quarter 2018. Adjusted EBITDA,
which is a non-GAAP measure used by management to evaluate the
operations of the Akorn business, was $17.6 million for the fourth
quarter 2019, compared to $(19.9) million for the fourth quarter
2018.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/o0UHaY

                            About Akorn

Headquartered in Lake Forest, Illinois, Akorn, Inc. --
http://www.akorn.com/-- is a specialty pharmaceutical company
engaged in the development, manufacture and marketing of
multisource and branded pharmaceuticals.  Akorn has manufacturing
facilities located in Decatur, Illinois; Somerset, New Jersey;
Amityville, New York; Hettlingen, Switzerland and Paonta Sahib,
India that manufacture ophthalmic, injectable and specialty sterile
and non-sterile pharmaceuticals.

                           *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Feb. 24, 2020, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded the ratings of Akorn, Inc. including the Corporate
Family Rating to Caa3 from Caa1.  The downgrade reflects the high
risk of a near-term bankruptcy filing by Akorn, given its ongoing
litigation and $845 million term loan maturity in April 2021.

Also in February 2020, S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit
rating on Akorn Inc. to 'CCC-' from 'B-' with negative outlook.
The negative outlook reflects the increasing possibility that Akorn
will file for Chapter 11 protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
in the next six months to facilitate repayment of its outstanding
debt.


ALTA MESA: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Through April 30
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Marvin Isgur of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas authorized Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. and its
affiliates to use cash collateral in accordance with the terms of
the Second Amended Final Order.

The AMH Debtors' right to use the Cash Collateral pursuant to the
Order will automatically terminate  on the earliest to occur of any
of these events:

     (a) The passing of 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) on
April 30, 2020;

     (b) The entry of any order modifying, reversing, revoking,
staying, rescinding, vacating, or amending the Second Amended Final
Order without the express written consent of the Administrative
Agent, acting at the direction of the Required Lenders;

     (c) Any Prepetition Loan Party's case is dismissed or
converted to a case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, or a
trustee under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code or an examiner with
expanded powers is appointed in any Prepetition Loan Party's case,
or any Prepetition Loan Party seeks entry of an order accomplishing
any of the foregoing;

     (d) An order is entered granting another claim or lien pari
passu with or senior to the Prepetition Liens, Administrative
Adequate Protection Liens or Administrative Adequate Protection
Claims granted to the Prepetition Secured Parties under the Second
Amended Final Order or an order of the Court is entered reversing,
staying for a period in excess of five business days, vacating or
otherwise amending, supplementing, or modifying the Second Amended
Final Order in a manner materially adverse to the Prepetition
Secured Parties;

     (e) Any proceeding is commenced by any AMH Debtor seeking, or
otherwise consenting to (i) the invalidation, subordination, or
other challenge to the Prepetition Secured Indebtedness,
Prepetition Liens, Prepetition Secured Claims, Administrative
Adequate Protection Liens or Administrative Adequate Protection
Claims or (ii) any relief under section 506(c) of the Bankruptcy
Code with respect to any Prepetition Collateral or any Collateral,
including the Cash Collateral, or (iii) any AMH Debtor files a
motion, pleading, or proceeding which could reasonably be expected
to result in a material impairment of the rights or interests of
the Prepetition Secured Parties, except any motion or other
pleading otherwise permitted by the Second Amended Final Order;

     (f) The entry by the Court of an order granting relief from
the automatic stay imposed by section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code to
any entity other than the Administrative Agent or the Prepetition
Secured Parties;

     (g) The effective date of any confirmed chapter 11 plan for
the Prepetition Loan Parties;

     (h) The entry of a subsequent order of the Court (i)
terminating the Prepetition Loan Parties' use of Cash Collateral or
(ii) authorizing the use of Cash Collateral by any AMH Debtor that
is not a Prepetition Loan Party;

     (i) The failure by the Prepetition Loan Parties to make any
payment required pursuant to the Second Amended Final Order when
due;

     (j) The failure by the AMH Debtors to deliver to the
Administrative Agent any of the documents or other information
required to be delivered pursuant to the Order when due or any such
documents or other information will contain a material
misrepresentation;

     (k) AMH Debtors' failure to adhere to the Budget or a
Subsequent Budget except with respect to Permitted Deviations or
Non-Conforming Uses;

     (l) The failure of the AMH Debtors to observe or perform any
of the material terms or material provisions contained in the
Order;

     (m) The entry of an order of the Court approving the terms of
any debtor in possession financing for any of the Prepetition Loan
Parties;

     (n) The AMH Debtors' actual receipts during any period from
the commencement of the Budget period through the last day of the
same Budget period fall more than 10% below the AMH Debtors'
projected receipts for that same period;

     (o) The Prepetition Loan Parties or the Independent Manager
modify or reduce (i) the scope of the authority granted by the
board of managers of Debtor Alta Mesa Holdings GP, LLC to the
Independent Manager as set forth in the resolutions attached to the
chapter 11 petition filed by Debtor Alta Mesa Holdings GP, LLC,
(ii) the terms of the letter from the Independent Manager dated
Sept. 11, 2019, without the prior written consent of the
Administrative Agent, or (iii) the scope of authority granted to
Robert Albergotti as Chief Restructuring Officer;

     (p) The Motion of the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors for (I) Leave, Standing, and Authority to Commence and
Prosecute Certain Claims and Causes of Action on Behalf of the
Debtors' Estates and (II) Exclusive Settlement Authority will not
have been denied in full or withdrawn with prejudice on or before
11:59 p.m. on March 24, 2020; or

     (q) The AMH Debtors will fail to meet any of the following
milestones:

                 -- the Closing will have occurred by Feb. 28,
2020;

                 -- the Prepetition Loan Parties have filed with
the Bankruptcy Court a chapter 11 plan and related disclosure
statement (with terms and substance reasonably acceptable to the
Administrative Agent at the direction of the Required Lenders) by
March 6, 2020;

                 -- the Prepetition Loan Parties will have obtained
entry of an order of the Court conditionally approving an
Acceptable Disclosure Statement by March 13, 2020;

                 -- the Prepetition Loan Parties will have obtained
entry of an order of the Court (a) approving an Acceptable
Disclosure Statement and (b) confirming an Acceptable Plan, by
April 14, 2020; and

                 -- an Acceptable Plan will have become effective
by April 30, 2020.

The Prepetition Secured Parties are granted the following adequate
protection to the extent of any collateral diminution:

     (a) a valid, binding, continuing, enforceable, fully-perfected
first priority senior security interest in and lien on  the
Prepetition Collateral and all other of the Prepetition Loan
Parties' now owned and hereafter-acquired real and personal
property, assets and rights of any kind or nature;

     (b) an allowed administrative expense claim in the amount of
any collateral diminution arising pursuant to section 507(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code against each of the Prepetition Loan Parties on a
joint and several basis with priority over all other administrative
claims in the Cases; and

     (c) The Prepetition Loan Parties are authorized and directed
to pay to the Administrative Agent for the ratable benefit of the
Prepetition Secured Parties adequate protection payments in an
amount equal to all accrued and unpaid (i) prepetition and
postpetition interest, and (ii) without duplication of the  the
professional fees and expenses, prepetition or postpetition fees
and costs due and payable under the Credit Agreement (including,
without limitation, interest on loans, breakage costs and accrued
fees owing to the Administrative Agent).

                     About Alta Mesa Resources

Alta Mesa Resources, Inc. is an independent energy company focused
on the development and acquisition of unconventional oil and
natural gas reserves in the Anadarko Basin in Oklahoma, and through
Kingfisher Midstream, LLC, provides best-in-class midstream energy
services, including crude oil and gas gathering, processing and
marketing and produced water disposal to producers in the STACK
play.

Alta Mesa reported $1.4 billion in assets and $864 million in
liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2018.

Alta Mesa and six affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-35133) on Sept. 11, 2019.

The Hon. Marvin Isgur is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Porter Hedges LLP and Latham & Watkins LLP as
attorneys; and Perella Weinberg Partners LP and its affiliate Tudor
Pickering Holt & Co Advisors LP as investment banker.  Prime Clerk
LLC is the claims agent.



AMERICANN INC: JV Partner Starts Operations at MCC Building 1
-------------------------------------------------------------
AmeriCann's Joint Venture partner commenced cannabis operations on
Feb. 26, 2020, at AmeriCann's Massachusetts Cannabis Center in
Freetown, MA.  The initial phase of the development, Building 1, is
a 30,000 square foot state-of-the-art cultivation and processing
facility, 100 percent of which is occupied by Bask, Inc., an
existing Massachusetts licensed vertically integrated cannabis
operator.

AmeriCann has a 15-year Joint-Venture partnership with Bask that
provides AmeriCann with a 15 percent Revenue Participation Fee on
all Bask revenue.  The commencement of cannabis operations by Bask
at Building 1 coincides with AmeriCann's Revenue Participation
Fee.

The MCC is a planned one million square foot sustainable
greenhouse, processing and product manufacturing project in
Freetown, Massachusetts which is being developed by AmeriCann.

The Massachusetts cannabis market has some of the highest prices in
the United States, with wholesale prices exceeding $4,000 per pound
and retail prices greater than $8,000 per pound.  Building 1 is
projected to produce 7,500 pounds annually of dry flower cannabis
and over 400,000 units of infused products. AmeriCann projects a
1.5-year payback on its investment in Building 1.

                        About Americann

Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, AmeriCann is a specialized
cannabis company that is developing cultivation, processing and
manufacturing facilities.  AmeriCann uses greenhouse technology
which is superior to the current industry standard of growing
cannabis in warehouse facilities under artificial lights.
AmeriCann is designing GMP Certified cannabis extraction and
product manufacturing infrastructure.  Through a wholly-owned
subsidiary, AmeriCann Brands, Inc., the Company intends to secure
licenses to produce cannabis infused products including beverages,
edibles, topicals, vape cartridges and concentrates.  AmeriCann
Brands, Inc. plans to operate a Marijuana Product Manufacturing
business at MMCC with over 40,000 square feet of state-of-the art
extraction and product manufacturing infrastructure.

Americann reported a net loss of $4.90 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $4.43 million for the
year ended Sept. 30, 2018.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, Americann had
$17.06 million in total assets, $9.82 million in total liabilities,
and $7.24 million in total stockholders' equity.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Jan. 14, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit that raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


APG SUBS: March 11 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------
Judge David E. Rice has ordered that the motion of APG SUBS, INC.,
et al., debtors, to reschedule the March 3, 2020, hearing on the
debtors’ Disclosure Statement to March 11, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. is
granted.

The hearing on the debtors’ Disclosure Statement is rescheduled
to March 11, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.

                      About APG Subs Inc.

APG Subs, Inc., based in Edgewood, MD, and its affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Lead Case No. 19-18315) on June
19, 2019.  In the petition signed by Raymond Burrows, III,
president, the Debtor APG Subs. disclosed total assets of $28,177,
and total liabilities of $1,268,112 in both assets and liabilities.
The Hon. David E. Rice oversees the case.  Marc R. Kivitz, Esq.,
at the Law Office of Marc R. Kivitz, serves as bankruptcy counsel
to the Debtors.


APG SUBS: Still In Talks With Wyatt-Burrows and Bank
----------------------------------------------------
Katherine Wyatt-Burrows, Xenith Bank, a division of Atlantic Union
Bank, and APG Subs, Inc., CRW Foods, Inc., HRK Group, Inc., Ray's
Subway, Inc. and Shore Foods, Inc., stipulate on an extension for
Wyatt-Burrows and Atlantic Union Bank to send objections to the
Disclosure Statement.

Since the filing of the Amended Disclosure Statement, counsel for
both Wyatt-Burrows and the Bank have been involved in discussion
with Counsel for the Debtors regarding changes to the Amended
Disclosure Statement.

While these discussions have not yet resulted in an agreement on
revisions to the Amended Disclosure Statement, the parties are
cautiously optimistic that an agreement can be reached in the
future.

In order to facilitate further discussions, the Debtors have agreed
to provide both Wyatt-Burrows and the Bank with an extension
through and including March 9, 2020 in which to file an objection
to either the Amended Disclosure Statement or the Second Amended
Disclosure Statement that the Debtors anticipate filing.

Consistent with this extension, the Debtors are seeking to move the
hearing on approval of the Disclosure Statement from March 3 to
March 11, 2020 at 11 a.m. when they are already two matters on the
docket.

Attorneys for Katherine Wyatt-Burrows:

     Alan M. Grochal, Bar No.: 01447
     Tydings & Rosenberg LLP
     1 East Pratt Street, Suite 901
     Baltimore, MD 21202
     Tel: (410) 752-9715
     E-mail: agrochal@tydingslaw.com

Attorneys for Xenith Bank:

     Scott W. Foley, Esquire
     Daniel J. Zeller, Esquire
     Shapiro Sher Guinot & Sandler
     250 West Pratt Street, Suite 2000
     Baltimore, Maryland 21201
     Tel: (410) 385-4234
     E-mail: swf@shapirosher.com

Attorneys for Debtors:

     Marc R. Kivitz, Esquire
     201 North Charles Street, Suite 1330
     Baltimore, Maryland 21201
     Tel: (410) 625-2300
     E-mail: mkivitz@aol.com

                     About APG Subs Inc.

APG Subs, Inc., based in Edgewood, MD, and its affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Lead Case No. 19-18315) on June
19, 2019.  In the petition signed by Raymond Burrows, III,
president, the Debtor APG Subs. disclosed total assets of $28,177,
and total liabilities of $1,268,112 in both assets and liabilities.
The Hon. David E. Rice oversees the case.  Marc R. Kivitz, Esq.,
at the Law Office of Marc R. Kivitz, serves as bankruptcy counsel
to the Debtors.


APPLETON EXCHANGE: Bosco Buying Holyoke Property for $800K
----------------------------------------------------------
Appleton Exchange, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts to authorize the sale of its rights,
title and interests the real property located at 461-463 Appleton
Street, Holyoke, Massachusetts to Stephen Bosco for $800,000.

The Debtor is a limited liability company who owns two rental
apartment buildings, namely the Appleton Street and the 62
Commercial Street, Holyoke, Massachusetts, and also conducts
related estate business.  Both are residential rental buildings,
with Appleton Street having 30 rental units, and Commercial Street
having 16 units.
   
The Debtor has received an offer from the Buyer, 430 Appleton
Street, Holyoke, Massachusetts, for the purchase of the Property,
for the total purchase price of $800,000.  The Buyer has no
relationship with the Debtor whatsoever, including the Debtor's
equity holders.  The terms of the proposed sale are more
particularly described in their Purchase and Sale Agreement.

The Debtor anticipates that the sale will take place by mid-March,
2020.  The Purchase and Sales Agreement provides that the sale will
take place within 21 days of the entry of an Order by the
Bankruptcy Court approving the sale.   
     
The Debtor believed that the purchase price, as contained in the
Purchase and Sale Agreement, represents a fair and reasonable price
for Appleton Street.  Further commenting on the proposed purchase
price, the Debtor notes that Appleton Street has been the subject
of substantial repairs, requiring significant contributions of
capital by the Debtor's principals and equity holders.
Prepetition, the Debtor was cited for various housing violations,
with many tenants refusing to pay rent, although the Debtor's
operations have stabilized during the Chapter 11 case.  For these
reasons, the Debtor believes that the price in the Purchase and
Sales Agreement is fairest.

For the reasons set forth above, the Debtor believes that the
interests of the estate of the Chapter 11 Debtor is served by the
entry of an Order authorizing the Debtor to sell the aforesaid free
and clear of liens and encumbrances.

The Debtor believes that there are liens on Appleton Street in the
following order, as follows:

     a. Real Estate Taxes, Water and Sewer charges, and Utility
charges owed to the Holyoke Gas and Electric (a public utility
which is a department of the City of Holyoke), Company, in the
estimated amount of $40,000;

     b. Audrie Brooks Family Fund (successor in interest to Federal
National Mortgage Association), holder of a first (and only)
mortgage in the principal amount of $2.6 million, as filed in the
Hampden County Registry of Deeds at Book 22040 Page 311.

The Debtor asks the entry of Order(s) authorizing the Debtor to pay
the proceeds from the sale in the order and priority as listed:

     (a) To the City of Holyoke, any amount of Real Estate Taxes,
Water and Sewer charges, and Utility charges owed to the Holyoke
Gas and Electric as it regards 461-463 Appleton Street Holyoke,
Massachusetts;  

     (b) Other necessary fees required by the Registry of Deeds or
other routinely necessary charges for a real estate closing;

     (c)  A real estate broker’s fee of $40,000 (5% of the sales
price) to Robert Kushner/Kushner Realty, Inc;  

     (d)  If the property is sold to another party, in addition to
the return of the deposit(s) of $40,000, a payment of no more than
5% of the sales price to Steven Bosco as a breakup fee for expenses
incurred subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court; and

     (e)  The balance of the sales proceeds will be paid to the
Audrie Brooks Family Fund on account of its mortgage as
described.

The sale is free and clear of all liens and encumbrances.

In the event that a dispute arises between the Debtor and any party
affected by the Order(s) requested herein with respect to that
creditor's right to payment on account of its claim, the Debtor
will ask that the Court establishes an amount to be held in escrow
pending the resolution of such dispute and authorizing the Debtors
to pay all other claimants in whole or in part as the Court in its
discretion may determine.  

A copy of the Agreement is available at https://tinyurl.com/wf6qxp6
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                    About Appleton Exchange

Appleton Exchange LLC is the fee simple owner of two properties in
Holyoke, MA having a total current value of $1.2 million.

Appleton Exchange LLC filed a voluntary petition seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No.
19-30694) on August 30, 2019. In the petition signed by Moshe
Wolcowitz, manager, the Debtor estimated $1,200,701 in assets and
$1,900,816 in liabilities. Louis S. Robin, Esq., at the Law Offices
of Louis S. Robin, represents the Debtor as counsel.


ASP NAPA: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-'; Outlook Negative
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on ASP NAPA
Holdings LLC to 'B-' from 'B'. The outlook is negative.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level ratings on the
company's senior secured revolving facility and first-lien term
loan to 'B-' from 'B'. The recovery rating on this debt remains
'3', indicating expectations for meaningful (50%-70%, rounded
estimate: 60%) recovery in a default.

The combination of wages pressure, unfavorable payor mix shift, and
continued acquisition activity will result in persistent margin
pressure and minimal cash flow generation over the next few years.
ASP NAPA Holdings posted cash flow deficits in each of the past
two years. For 2019, the deficit was $4 million. S&P expects cash
flow to improve a little for 2020, but to remain weak at about
breakeven. Although the company has taken steps to improve its
receivable days as well as manage its overall revenue cycle
management (RCM) issues, S&P believes free cash flow will remain
weak. NAPA has been facing wage pressure from a tight labor market
that contributes to significant wage increases for existing staff
and nurses as higher locum expenses at new sites. As a result, S&P
expects EBITDA margins to remain pressured (S&P's adjusted EBITDA
margin declined by 80 basis points in full-year 2019 from 12.6% in
2018), resulting in leverage above 6.5x in 2020-2021 and minimal
cash flow generation. In addition, the rating agency believes NAPA
will continue to integrate acquisitions to supplement its flat
same-store patient volumes, resulting in elevated working capital
needs and constraining cash flow generation.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's view that wages pressure and
elevated working capital needs to support the company's growth
investments could constrain earnings and cash flow possibly leading
to further underperformance. The outlook also reflects the
approaching maturity on the company's revolver due April 2021 and
the increased risk of a violation of its first-lien leverage
covenant after the stepdown in March 2020.

"We could downgrade the company if it continues to struggle to
convert growing revenue and EBITDA into better cash flow. We could
also lower the rating if we believe the company does not have
ability to remain in compliance with its financial covenants. We
could consider lowering our rating on NAPA if the step down of its
financial covenants in March 2020 significantly impairs liquidity
or the company does not appear to have a plan to replace or extend
the maturity of the revolver well ahead of its maturity date of
April 2021," S&P said.

"We could raise the rating if the company improves its margins and
working capital such that it consistently generates annual free
cash flow of more than $10 million," the rating agency said.


ASPEN LANDSCAPING: Unsecureds Get 90% Dividend in Plan
------------------------------------------------------
Aspen Landscaping Contracting, Inc., filed a First Amended Chapter
11 Plan and a corresponding Disclosure Statement.

Aspen's main asset is the accounts receivable from the current
projects that it is completing.  Aspen estimates that the accounts
receivable as of the Petition Date are approximately $3 million.
Aspen also asserts it is owed approximately $1 million in
retainage.

Holders of Class 11 General unsecured claims are IMPAIRED.  Total
amount of general unsecured claims is still being determined in
light of the fact that certain claims are subject to objection and
reclassification, but are anticipated between $1 million and $2
million.  General unsecured creditors are projected to recover 90
percent.  Allowed Class 11 Claims will be paid a dividend of 90
percent as follows: 10% percent in year 1; 15% in year 2; 20% in
years 3, and 4; and 25% in year 5.  Payments may be made quarterly.


The funds necessary for funding the Plan will be derived from funds
on hand on the Effective Date and from future earnings of the
Debtor.  In addition, Maria A. Fuentes will pay certain "new value"
in the amount of $500,000 to obtain the Interests in the
Reorganized Debtor subject to the sale process set forth.

The hearing at which the Court will determine whether to confirm
the Plan will take place on April 17, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in
Courtroom 3B, United States Bankruptcy Court, Martin Luther King
Jr. Federal Building & Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Third Floor,
Newark, New Jersey 07102.

Objections to the confirmation of the Plan must be filed and served
by April 9, 2020.

Your ballot must be received by April 9, 2020, or it will not be
counted.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement dated
Feb. 17, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/wfg77mb from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Debtor:

     Richard D. Trenk, Esq.
     Robert S. Roglieri, Esq.
     McMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, LLC
     75 Livingston Avenue, Second Floor
     Roseland, New Jersey 07068
     Tel: (973) 622-1800
     E-mail: rtrenk@msbnj.com
             rroglieri@msbnj.com

                About Aspen Landscaping Contracting

Aspen Landscaping Contracting, Inc. -- https://www.aspennj.net/ --
is a landscaping contractor located in Union, New Jersey serving
commercial and residential clients.  The company offers wetland
mitigation, planting, hydroseeding, irrigation, railroad spraying,
tree removal/pruning/clearing, erosion control/soil stabilization,
soil procurement and grading, and landfill work.

Aspen Landscaping Contracting sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 19-31885) on Nov. 20, 2019, in Newark, New Jersey.
In the petition was signed by Maria A. Fuentes, president, the
Debtor was listed with total assets at $2,429,468 and total
liabilities at $2,510,983.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia oversees the case.

MCMANIMON, SCOTLAND & BAUMANN, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  SAX,
LLP, serves as accountant to the Debtor.


ATLAS INTERMEDIATE: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR; Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to
U.S.-based infrastructure professional and technical services
company Atlas Intermediate Holdings LLC with stable outlook.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B' issue-level rating to the
$281 million first-lien senior secured term loan due 2027 issued by
Atlas to partly fund the acquisition of the company by Boxwood
Merger Corp. for $628 million. S&P's '3' recovery rating indicates
its expectation for meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate:
55%) in the event of a payment default.

The rating on Atlas reflects S&P's view of the company's modest
size and narrow geographic scope in the broader global engineering
and construction (E&C) services industry. Atlas has reached
national scale, following recent acquisitions, in the highly
fragmented infrastructure and construction testing, inspection, and
certification market in the U.S. However, S&P believes overall
demand depends on the economic strength of the transportation,
commercial, and industrial markets, which comprise the majority of
the company's revenue base. Further, S&P's view of the company's
financial risk reflects increased leverage pro forma for the
transaction and majority ownership by a financial sponsor as a
publicly listed company.

The stable outlook on Atlas reflects S&P's view that the company
will experience an increase in margins over the next 12 months as
expenses related to the business combination will not recur and
revenues should grow modestly driven by demand for maintenance of
an aging installed base of infrastructure assets. S&P assumes this
will result in FOCF of about 5% of adjusted debt and adjusted debt
to EBITDA in the mid-6x area over the next 12 months.

"We could lower our rating on Atlas during the next 12 months if it
appears EBITDA margins will deteriorate substantially beyond our
expectations on a sustained basis, such that we anticipate adjusted
debt to EBITDA will increase above 6.5x on a sustained basis or
FOCF to adjusted debt will approach zero. This could be caused by
an unexpected decline in market conditions resulting in reduced
demand for its testing and inspection services. Alternatively, we
could lower the rating if the company continues its acquisition
strategy by pursuing large debt-financed transactions, increasing
adjusted debt to EBITDA above 6.5x," S&P said.

"Although unlikely, we could raise the rating if we believe that
the company's financial sponsor owners would support adjusted debt
levels approaching 4x EBITDA on a sustained basis, along with FOCF
to adjusted debt consistently around at least 10%, and if we
believed the chances of the company re-leveraging beyond 5x were
minimal," the rating agency said.


BL RESTAURANTS: Russell R. Johnson III Represents Utility Companies
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC submitted a verified
statement to disclose that it is representing the utility companies
that provided prepetition utility goods/services to the Debtors,
and continue to provide post-petition utility goods/services to the
Debtors in the Chapter 11 cases of BL Restaurants Holdings, LLC, et
al.

The names and addresses of the Utilities represented by the Firm
are:

     a. Salt River Project
        Attn: Diana Greer/ISB 232
        2727 E. Washington St.
        Phoenix, AZ 85034-1403

     b. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company
        PECO Energy Company
        Attn: Lynn R. Zack, Esq.
        Assistant General Counsel
        Exelon Corporation
        2301 Market Street, S23-1
        Philadelphia, PA 19103

     c. Commonwealth Edison Company
        Attn: Erin Buechler
        Claims & Collection Counsel
        3 Lincoln Centre
        Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181

     d. Connecticut Light and Power Company
        NStar Electric Company, Eastern Massachusetts
        Attn: Honor S. Heath, Esq.
        Eversource Energy
        107 Selden Street
        Berlin, CT 06037

     e. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
        Toledo Edison Company
        Attn: Kathy M. Hofacre
        FirstEnergy Corp.
        76 S. Main St., A-GO-15
        Akron, OH 44308

     f. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.
        Constellation NewEnergy – Gas Division, LLC
        Attn: C. Bradely Burton
        Credit Analyst
        Constellation Energy
        1310 Point Street, 12th Floor
        Baltimore, MD 21231

     g. NextEra Energy Services Ohio, LLC
        Attn: John Gray, Esq.
        Senior Attorney
        NextEra Energy Resources
        20455 SH 249, Suite 200
        Houston, TX 77070

The nature and the amount of claims (interests) of the Utilities,
and the times of acquisition thereof are as follows:

     a. The following Utilities have unsecured claims against the
above-referenced Debtors arising from prepetition utility usage:
Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Commonwealth Edison Company,
Constellation NewEnergy, Inc., Constellation NewEnergy – Gas
Division, LLC, Connecticut Light & Power Company, NStar Electric
Company, Eastern Massachusetts, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
Company, Toledo Edison Company, NextEera Energy Services Ohio, LLC
and PECO Energy Company.

     b. For more information regarding the claims and interests of
the Utilities in these jointly-administered cases, refer to the
Objection of Certain Utility Companies To the Debtors' Motion For
Entry of Interim and Final Orders (I) Prohibiting Utility Providers
From Altering, Refusing, or Discontinuing Utility Services, (II)
Determining Adequate Assurance of Payment For Future Utility
Services, (III) Establishing Procedures For Determining Adequate
Assurance of Payment, and (IV) Granting Related Relief (Docket No.
140) filed in the above-captioned, jointly-administered, bankruptcy
cases.

     c. Salt River Project holds a surety bond that secured
prepetition debt.

The Law Firm of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC was retained to
represent the foregoing Utilities in January and February 2020.
The circumstances and terms and conditions of employment of the
Firm by the Companies is protected by the attorney-client privilege
and attorney work product doctrine.

The Firm can be reached at:

          LAW FIRM OF RUSSELL R. JOHNSON III, PLC
          Russell R. Johnson III, Esq.
          2258 Wheatlands Drive
          Manakin-Sabot, VA 23103
          Telephone: (804) 749-8861
          Facsimile: (804) 749-8862
          E-mail: russell@russelljohnsonlawfirm.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/7MkMyh

                    About BL Restaurants

Founded in 1991, BL Restaurants Holding, LLC operates gastrobars at
various locations including lifestyle centers, traditional shopping
malls, event locations, central business districts and other
stand-alone specialty sites.

BL Restaurants and three affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 20-10156) on
Jan. 27, 2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors were
estimated to have assets of between $50 million and $100 million
and liabilities of between $100 million and $500 million.  The
petitions were signed by Howard Meitiner, chief restructuring
officer.  

The Debtors tapped Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzurg LLP as legal
counsel; Configure Partners LLC as investment banker; Carl Marks
Advisory Group LLC as restructuring advisor; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions Inc as notice and claims agent.


BRINK'S CO: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB+' ICR
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised to negative from stable its outlook on
Richmond, Va.-based The Brink's Co., which plans to purchase the
majority of G4S PLC's cash operations business for $860 million in
a mostly debt-financed acquisition, with initial funding sourced
from borrowings under the credit facility.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB+' issuer credit rating on
Brink's and its 'BB' issue-level rating on the company's unsecured
notes due 2027. S&P's '5' recovery rating remains unchanged.

The affirmation reflects S&P's generally favorable view of the
acquisition and Brink's improved global footprint.  The acquisition
will further entrench Brink's leading market position by increasing
its revenue scale to over $4.5 billion, broadening its geographic
reach beyond 135 countries, and expanding its market share to 30%.
In global cash-in-transit (CIT) market, Brink's is currently
trailed by Loomis (unrated, $2.2 billion of revenue in 20
countries), Prosegur Cash ($2 billion in 22 countries), and Garda
($0.8 billion in two countries). The acquisition, which the company
expects to contribute $115 million to its adjusted EBITDA, will
introduce Brink's to several new markets in countries across Europe
and Asia, among others. S&P views global CIT opportunities
favorably due to the stronger fundamentals for cash usage overseas
relative to North America. That said, while the increased global
penetration is important for the company's competitive advantage,
it offers limited cost benefits due to the dispersed nature of the
territories (contrary to North America which offers substantial
route-density benefits). In addition, geographic expansion further
exposes Brink's to foreign exchange-related challenges.

The negative outlook on Brink's reflects the integration risk and
incremental debt burden associated with its acquisition of the
majority of G4S' cash solutions business, which will increase its
adjusted leverage to more than 4x and reduce its FFO to debt to
about 17%. The outlook also incorporates the possibility that the
company's credit metrics will remain elevated over the next 12
months if it experiences any operational hurdles.

"We could revise our outlook on Brink's to stable over the next 12
months if it demonstrates solid execution on its integration of
G4S', implements planned cost improvement initiatives, and
increases its revenue, thereby improving FFO to debt beyond 20%,"
S&P said.

"We could lower our ratings on Brink's over the next 12 months if
it experiences difficulty in integrating its acquisitions or incurs
unforeseen customer losses or other operational missteps that lead
to a prolonged contraction in its profitability which prevents the
improvement of FFO-to-debt above 20%. We could also lower our
ratings if the company engages in substantial debt-funded
acquisitions, causing it to maintain a higher-than-expected level
of debt leverage, or if it transitions to a more aggressive
financial policy that includes debt-funded share repurchases," the
rating agency said.


BRINK'S COMPANY: Moody's Affirms Ba1 CFR & Alters Outlook to Neg.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed The Brink's Company's Ba1
Corporate Family rating, Ba1-PD Probability of Default rating and
Ba2 senior unsecured ratings. The Speculative Grade Liquidity
rating was downgraded to SGL-3 from SGL-2. The ratings outlook was
revised to negative from stable.

Brink's announced it has agreed to purchase from G4S plc ("G4S")
certain cash solutions businesses for GBP660 million in cash.
Brink's will acquire the G4Si global logistics division and
cash-in-transit operations mostly in Europe and Asia, but will not
acquire G4S's cash solutions businesses in the US, UK and certain
other countries. Brink's expects to close and fund the acquisition
in several stages over the course of 2020. Brink's estimates the
acquired businesses will have 2020 revenue and adjusted EBITDA (as
defined by Brink's, before anticipated cost reduction targets) of
over GBP650 million and around GBP100 million, respectively.

RATINGS RATIONALE

"Brink's acquisition of certain G4S businesses will expand its
already leading cash-in-transit and secured logistics capabilities
to more countries and for additional customers, but leverage will
be elevated while it integrates the wide array of geographically
diverse assets," said Edmond DeForest, Moody's Vice President and
Senior Credit Officer.

The Ba1 CFR reflects Brink's market leadership across a number of
security related services, its geographic diversification and
Moody's expectations for mid-single-digit percent organic revenue
growth (before currency translation impacts). Moody's anticipates
Brink's may add around $1 billion of incremental debt to purchase
the G4S cash solutions businesses, driving debt to EBITDA of about
3.3 times as of December 31, 2019 to around 4.2 times pro forma for
$1 billion of additional debt and $100 million of acquired EBITDA.
However, Moody's anticipates financial leverage will return to
below 3.5 times in 2021, driven by mid-single-digit percent organic
revenue growth (before currency translation impacts), EBITA margin
expansion to approaching 13% from about 11% at December 31, 2019,
the achievement of approximately $20 million of planned G4S
merger-related cost reductions and debt repayment.

All financial metrics cited reflect Moody's standard analytical
adjustments, unless otherwise noted.

Growth and profit rate expansion should be driven by higher-profit
new products, ongoing expense management initiatives and lower
operating costs enabled by efficiency-oriented investments,
including single-driver vehicles. However, expenses associated with
the debt-financed G4S acquisition, including transaction fees and
integration costs, and elevated capital expenditures in growth and
efficiency investments will pressure and limit free cash flow.
Revenue growth could be limited by volume and pricing pressure and
currency translation impacts. Additional factors pressuring volumes
and profitability include the growth of non-cash payment methods,
volatile retail expenditures and diamond and jewelry shipments,
structural cost issues (pensions) and pricing pressure given a
challenging banking industry environment. International operations
account for the majority of revenues and preponderance of profits,
notably in volatile markets including Mexico, Argentina and Brazil,
but the company's debt is denominated in US dollars.

Moody's considers Brink's environmental and social risks as
limited. There are reputational risks attendant to possible use of
firearms by its employees during occasional criminal incidents.
Moody's considers Brink's financial strategies transparent,
consistent with other publicly-traded companies, but aggressive and
opportunistic. Brink's is an active acquirer of related businesses,
generally using debt proceeds to fund its purchases. The company
has also boosted cash returns to shareholders over the past few
years. Moody's anticipates additional debt financed acquisitions in
the future, although not of the scale of G4S and not within the
next 12 months, as well as growth capital investments. However,
Brink's has indicated it will seek to maintain net debt to EBITDA
(as defined by the company) below 3 times.

The downgrade of the SGL rating to SGL-3 from SGL-2 is driven by
the burden of the large cash-funded acquisition on Brink's existing
committed liquidity sources. The SGL-3 liquidity rating reflects
Moody's assessment of Brink's overall liquidity as adequate.
Although Brink's has not yet announced the sources of financing for
the G4S asset purchases, Moody's assumes the company will seek
additional permanent financing sources. In the meanwhile, Brink's
could use some combination of its $311 million of unrestricted cash
and around $800 million available under its $1 billion senior
secured revolving credit facility (unrated) due 2024 as of December
31, 2019, as well as around $150 million of anticipated free cash
flow in 2020, to fund the acquisition. There is also $40 million of
annual required term debt amortization. If Moody's anticipates
Brink's cannot or will not seek additional permanent financing
sources to improve its liquidity profile by, for instance,
regaining access to a large portion of its $1 billion senior
secured revolving credit facility, the liquidity and credit ratings
could be downgraded. The company must comply with financial
covenants applicable to its secured indebtedness, including maximum
net leverage and minimum interest coverage tests (as defined in the
secured facility agreement); Moody's expects Brink's will
comfortably comply with the tests over the next year.

The Ba2 senior unsecured rating reflects the Ba1-PD PDR and a loss
given default assessment of LGD5, reflecting effective
subordination to all the secured debt, including the $1 billion
revolver and $770 million of term loans (unrated) due 2024
outstanding as of December 31, 2019. The senior notes are
guaranteed by substantially all of the domestic subsidiaries of the
company.

The negative ratings outlook reflects Moody's concerns that weaker
than expected financial results, greater cost or time to achieve
cost reduction targets or additional debt-funded acquisitions could
cause Brink's financial leverage to remain elevated in 2021 and
beyond. The ratings outlook could be revised to stable if Moody's
anticipates profit rate expansion, free cash flow growth, an
improved liquidity profile and debt to EBITDA below 3.5 times.

Higher ratings are possible if an extended improvement in financial
performance through consistent revenue and earnings growth and
material free cash flow generation becomes adequate to fund Brink's
acquisition and growth investments. Moody's could upgrade the
ratings if it anticipates Brink's will sustain: 1) debt to EBITDA
below 2.5 times; 2) EBITA to interest expense above 4 times; 3)
free cash flow to debt exceeding 10%; 4) balanced financial
policies; and 5) a low proportion of secured to total debt.

A downgrade of the ratings is possible if Moody's anticipates: 1)
debt to EBITDA sustained above 3.5 times; 2) declines in EBITA
margins; 3) weak or no free cash flow growth; 4) diminished
liquidity; or 5) more aggressive financial policies, including the
use of debt proceeds to increase shareholder returns.

Issuer: Brink's Company (The)

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba1

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba1-PD

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba2 (LGD5)

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-3 from
  SGL-2

  Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

The Brink's Company (NYSE:BCO), headquartered in Richmond, VA,
provides security-related services on a global basis. Services
include cash-in-transit, secure transportation of valuables, ATM
servicing, payment services, guarding and related logistics.
Moody's expects revenue of over $3.5 billion (without the
businesses acquired from G4S) in 2020.


BROWNIE'S MARINE: Receives $125K From Partial Exercise of Warrant
-----------------------------------------------------------------
As previously reported on March 7, 2019 Brownie's Marine Group,
Inc. issued and sold to Mr. Charles Hyatt, an accredited investor,
a unit of the securities of the Company, with the unit  consisting
of 50,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock, par value
$0.0001 per share and 50,000,000 eighteen month common stock
purchase warrants exercisable at $0.01 per share.  On Feb. 23,
2020, Mr. Hyatt exercised a portion of the Warrant representing
12,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock.  The Company
received proceeds of $125,000 from this partial Warrant exercise
and the Company did not pay any fees or commissions in connection
with the exercise of a portion of the Warrant.  The Company is
using the proceeds for general working capital.  The issuance of
the shares of the Company's common stock to Mr. Hyatt upon the
partial exercise of the Warrant was exempt from registration under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance on an exemption
provided by Section 3(a)(9) of such act.

                      About Brownie's Marine

Headquartered in Pompano Beach, Florida, Brownie's Marine Group,
Inc. -- http://www.browniesmarinegroup.com/-- designs, tests,
manufactures and distributes recreational hookah diving, yacht
based scuba air compressor and nitrox generation systems, scuba and
water safety products through its wholly owned subsidiary Trebor
Industries, Inc. and manufactures and sells high pressure air and
industrial gas compressor packages through its wholly owned
subsidiary Brownie's High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc.  The
Company sells its products both on a wholesale and retail basis,
and does so from its headquarters and manufacturing facility in
Pompano Beach, Florida. The Company does business as (dba)
Brownie's Third Lung, the d/b/a name of Trebor Industries, Inc. and
Brownie's High Pressure Compressor Services, Inc.

Brownies Marine reported a net loss of $1.30 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $248,744 for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had
$1.78 million in total assets, $1.68 million in total liabilities,
and $103,938 in total stockholders' equity.

Liggett & Webb, P.A., in Boynton Beach, Florida, the Company's
auditor since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated June 7, 2019, citing that the Company has experienced
net losses for consecutive periods and has a large accumulated
deficit.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


C&S WHOLESALE: S&P Affirms 'B+' ICR, Ratings Off Watch Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings removed the ratings on Keene, N.H.-based
distributor C&S Wholesale Grocers Inc. (C&S) from CreditWatch with
negative implications, where S&P placed them on Dec. 13, 2019
following the announcement of its key customer loss, and affirmed
the 'B+' issuer credit rating.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB' issue-level rating on the
company's revolver and 'BB-' issue-level rating on its senior
notes. The recovery ratings are unchanged including its '1'
recovery rating on the asset-based lending (ABL) facility. Once the
secured notes are redeemed (expected to occur on March 23), S&P
will discontinue its ratings on the company.

The affirmation reflects C&S' significant debt pay down and S&P's
expectation that the company will have sufficient cushion to absorb
the gradual loss of contracts with Ahold Delhaize USA (Ahold) and
other industry headwinds.  S&P downgraded C&S in 2019 as the loss
of its top customers weakened the company's competitive position.
Pro forma for the repayment of its upcoming senior notes
maturities, S&P expects leverage to remain below 5x. Additionally,
despite the loss of contracts with Ahold, the rating agency expects
further deleveraging in 2020 as a result of better margins. The
decline in Ahold's purchase volumes will be gradual until 2024 and
S&P estimates that about 20% of the company's current sales will be
lost by the end of fiscal 2022 (ending September 2022). S&P expects
management to implement measures to implement cost-savings and
efficiency measures to improve profitability and offset pressure
from the topline declines. S&P's base case assumes limited
acquisition activity in the next one to two years as the company
focuses on improving margins and credit metrics, although the
rating agency notes the industry's consolidating dynamic could
result in future M&A.

The stable outlook on C&S reflects S&P's expectation that the
company will be able to sustain EBITDA margins, adequate liquidity,
and a narrow range of credit metrics including adjusted debt to
EBITDA between 4x and 4.5x and funds from operations (FFO) to debt
of 15% to 20% over the next 12 months. The rating agency also
expects C&S' acquisition activity will be limited in the next one
to two years as the company focuses on improving its thin margins
as it faces the gradual loss of contracts with Ahold Delhaize USA
and a challenged grocery environment.

"We could lower the rating during the next 12 months if we expect
adjusted debt to EBITDA to remain above 5x or if FFO to total debt
approaches 12%. This could occur if the company underperforms our
expectations whether due to continued industry challenges, failure
to achieve planned cost savings or if the company losses another
major customer. We could also lower the rating if we expect a more
aggressive financial policy possibly driven by debt-financed
acquisitions," S&P said.

"We could raise our ratings if we expect C&S to maintain leverage
of less than 4x and FFO to total debt of about 20% or higher and we
forsee positive operating performance trends for sales (excluding
Ahold) and in profitability," the rating agency said.


CALFRAC WELL: S&P Raises ICR to 'CCC-' After Debt Exchange
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its long-term issuer credit rating on
Calgary, Alta.-based Calfrac Well Services Ltd. to 'CCC-' from 'SD'
after the company completed distressed debt exchange, which reduced
its debt by US$98 million.

The rating agency also raised its issue-level rating on the
company's senior unsecured notes involved in the distressed debt
exchange to 'CC' from 'D'. At the same time, S&P revised its
recovery rating on the unsecured debt to '5' from '4'.

S&P's 'CCC-' issuer credit rating on Calfrac reflects the
likelihood of additional distressed exchanges in the near term,
given the company's still-high debt load and current bond trading
levels. The company recently completed a debt exchange for a
portion of its unsecured notes due 2026 (US$218 million of total
US$650 million) for new US$120 million second-lien secured notes
due 2026--45% below par value. The transaction reduced the
company's debt by US$98 million (about C$130 million) and cash
interest by US$5.5 million (about C$7.3 million). Still, S&P
believes the debt and interest burden remains high and
unsustainable in the long term. With the company's longer-dated
unsecured debt still trading below 30% to par, S&P believes Calfrac
could consider additional debt exchanges the rating agency would
view as distressed in the near term.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's view that Calfrac's operating
challenges will continue in 2020, which would pressure the
company's already negative FOCF and liquidity position such that
distressed debt restructuring becomes likely in the near term.

"We would lower the rating if continued free cash flow deficits or
credit facility borrowing base limitations result in accelerated
deterioration in Calfrac's liquidity position. In such a scenario,
the company would face an increased risk to meet its financial
commitments and maintenance capital spending requirements, such
that there is a heightened possibility of further debt
restructurings that we view as distressed," S&P said.

"We could raise the rating if we believe the company would no
longer consider a debt exchange we would view as distressed. For
this to happen, we would expect improving market conditions for
pressure pumping will enable the company to generate
neutral-to-positive free cash flows and strengthen its liquidity
position, such that it would be able to fully fund its financing
and capital spending requirements from operating cash flows," the
rating agency said.


CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Reports $28 Million Net Loss for 2019
-----------------------------------------------------------
California Resources Corporation filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net
loss attributable to common stock of $28 million on $2.63 billion
of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to net
income attributable to common stock of $328 million on $3.06
billion of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.

Including hedge settlements, the 2019 results reflected higher
year-over-year oil and natural gas sales despite a lower oil price
environment.  Adjusted net income for 2019 was $70 million, or
$1.40 per diluted share, compared with an adjusted net income of
$61 million, or $1.27 per diluted share, for 2018.  The 2019
adjusted net income excluded $166 million of non-cash derivative
losses, a net gain of $126 million from debt repurchases, $47
million in severance and termination benefits and a net $11 million
charge related to other unusual and infrequent items. Adjusted net
income for 2018 excluded $224 million on non-cash derivative gains,
a net gain of $57 million from debt repurchases, $4 million in
severance and termination benefits and a net $10 million charge
related to other unusual and infrequent items.

Total daily net production volumes averaged 128,000 BOE per day for
full year 2019, compared with 132,000 BOE per day for 2018, a
decrease of 3 percent.  The 2018 volumes reflect three quarters of
production from the April 2018 Elk Hills acquisition.  The 2019
volumes reflect the effect of the strategic Lost Hills divestiture
that occurred in May 2019.

In 2019, realized crude oil prices, including the effect of settled
hedges, increased $6.05 per barrel to $68.65 per barrel from $62.60
per barrel in 2018.  Settled hedges increased 2019 realized crude
oil prices by $3.82 per barrel, compared with a reduction of $7.51
per barrel for the same period in 2018.  Realized NGL prices
decreased 27 percent, or $11.96 per barrel to $31.71 per barrel in
2019 from $43.67 per barrel in 2018. Realized natural gas prices
decreased $0.13 per Mcf to $2.87 per Mcf, compared with $3.00 per
Mcf in 2018, largely due to increased national supply and milder
weather in 2019.

Production costs for full year 2019 were $895 million, or $19.16
per BOE, compared to $912 million, or $18.88 per BOE, in 2018. The
decrease in total production costs was primarily attributable to
the Lost Hills divestiture along with the effect of the workforce
reduction and lower downhole maintenance activity, while per unit
costs increased with the decline in total production.  Per unit
production costs, excluding the effect of PSCs, were $17.70 and
$17.47 per BOE for 2019 and 2018, respectively.

G&A expenses for the full year of 2019 were $290 million, compared
to $299 million in the same prior-year period, with the decrease
largely due to lower equity compensation expense in 2019 as a
result of a lower stock price and a reduction in headcount in the
fourth quarter of 2019.

Taxes other than on income were $157 million for 2019 compared to
$149 million in 2018.  Exploration expense of $29 million for 2019
was 15 percent lower than the $34 million in 2018.

CRC's internally funded capital investment in 2019 totaled $407
million, of which $302 million was directed to drilling and capital
workovers.  CRC's JV partners invested $205 million in 2019, all of
which was directed to drilling.  Of the Company's JV partners'
investment, BSP invested $48 million which is included in CRC's
consolidated results.

Cash provided by operating activities for the full year of 2019 was
$676 million and free cash flow was $269 million after taking into
account CRC's internally funded capital.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $6.96 billion in total assets,
$709 million in total current liabilities, $4.87 billion in
long-term debt, $146 million in deferred gain and issuance costs,
$720 million in other long-term liabilities, $802 million in
redeemable noncontrolling interests, and total deficit of $296
million.

California Resources reported a net loss attributable to common
stock of $67 million, or $1.36 per diluted share, compared to net
income attributable to common stock of $346 million, or $7.00 per
diluted share, for the same period of 2018.  Adjusted net income
for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $36 million, or $0.73 per
diluted share.  For the full year of 2019, CRC reported a net loss
attributable to common stock of $28 million, or $0.57 per diluted
share.  

Todd A. Stevens, CRC's president and chief executive officer,
commented, "We are extremely proud that we reduced our outstanding
net debt at year end below $5 billion.  We believe our announced
exchange transaction could reduce our debt by almost $1 billion and
is one of several steps moving towards our target leverage ratio
below 3x.  In 2019, we received strong confirmation of our ESG and
operational efforts, including earning a Leadership Level ranking
of A- on our climate disclosure from CDP and achieving a noteworthy
safety record of no recordable injuries among our employees during
the year."

Stevens continued, "Our VCI metric instills capital discipline and
provides for consistent and effective capital allocation.  In 2019,
we advanced CRC's capital investment plans by entering into our
third major development joint venture, with Alpine Energy Capital
committing up to $500 million of investments in our flagship Elk
Hills field.  We also increased our adjusted EBITDAX margins in
2019 for the third year in a row by optimizing our operations and
consolidating our organization."

"Further, our decision to utilize more JV capital in the fourth
quarter instead of internally funded capital, plus impacts from
power outages and fires, led CRC's net production to the low end of
our production guidance.  We are entering 2020 with an internally
funded capital program of $100 to $300 million, which we will
adjust as warranted based on market conditions.  We expect our JV
capital program in Elk Hills will increase our total capital
program by $160 to $200 million to support a total 2020 capital
program of approximately $260 to $500 million."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/gyLhyT

                  About California Resources

California Resources Corporation -- http://www.crc.com/-- is an
oil and natural gas exploration and production company
headquartered in Los Angeles, California.  CRC operates its
resource base exclusively within the State of California, applying
complementary and integrated infrastructure to gather, process and
market its production.

                          *    *    *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit
rating on California Resources Corp.  The affirmation reflects
S&P's expectation that CRC will continue to support its liquidity
by balancing its spending with its cash flow, selling non-core
assets, and potential for joint ventures in 2019 as mentioned in
the Company's fourth quarter conference call.

In November 2017, Moody's Investors Service upgraded California
Resources' Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to 'Caa1' from 'Caa2' and
Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to 'Caa1-PD' from 'Caa2-PD'.
Moody's said the upgrade of CRC's CFR to 'Caa1' reflects CRC's
improved liquidity and the likelihood that it will have sufficient
liquidity to support its operations for at least the next two years
at current commodity prices.


CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: S&P Affirms 'B' First-Lien Loan Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating on
California Resources Corp.'s first-lien loans. The recovery rating
remains '1', indicating S&P's expectation of very high (90% to
100%; rounded estimate: 95%) recovery.

S&P lowered the issuer credit rating on the company to 'CC' from
'CCC+' and its issue-level rating on the company's 2021, 2022, and
2024 notes to 'CC' (and will lower these to 'D' upon completion of
the transaction). The recovery rating on the 2022 second-lien notes
remains '2', indicating S&P's expectation of substantial (70%-90%;
rounded estimate: 80%) recovery in the event of a payment default.
Similarly, the recovery rating on the 2021 and 2024 unsecured notes
remains '6', indicating S&P's expectation of negligible (0%-10%;
rounded estimate: 0%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

The downgrade follows the company's announcement of a potential
exchange transaction that aims to swap CRC's 8% second-lien notes
due 2022, 5.5% unsecured notes due 2021, and its 6% unsecured notes
due 2024 into two packages of new securities including a)
"RoyaltyCo" notes and RoyaltyCo Class B shares or b) 1.75 lien term
loan and CRC warrants. The company is prioritizing the second-lien
notes, followed by the 2021 and 2024 unsecured notes, respectively.
Additionally, CRC is soliciting consents from holders of each issue
to permit the incurrence of more secured debt (requiring at least
majority of principal amount of each issue). The proposed
transactions are not contingent on a minimal amount of notes
tendered nor receipt of the aforementioned consents. The offers
expire on March 18, with an early participation deadline of March
4. The transaction is currently supported by approximately 25% of
the second lien notes, 27% of the 2021's and 5% of the 2024's.

The negative outlook reflects the possibility of holders of
existing notes exchanging into new securities at what S&P considers
to be lower value than originally promised. Should this occur, S&P
will lower the issuer credit rating to 'SD'.

"We would lower the issuer credit rating upon completion of the
debt exchange or conventional default," S&P said.

"We could raise our ratings on CRC if we no longer expect default
to be a virtual certainty. This could occur if the company
comprehensively addresses its over-levered capital structure and
upcoming debt maturities without utilizing an exchange we view as
distressed," the rating agency said.


CANCER GENETICS: Court Dismisses Class Action Suit Pending in N.J.
------------------------------------------------------------------
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
granted Cancer Genetics, Inc.'s motion to dismiss with prejudice a
purported class action complaint filed on April 5, 2018 against the
Company and members of its management, captioned In re Cancer
Genetics, Inc. Securities Litigation.  As previously reported, the
complaint alleged that the Company and members of its management
violated federal securities laws by making allegedly false and
misleading statements.  The Court's written order dismissed the
case in its entirety with prejudice, resulting in a termination of
all claims.  The plaintiffs have not indicated whether they will
appeal the dismissal.

                      About Cancer Genetics

Headquartered in Rutherford, New Jersey, Cancer Genetics, Inc. --
http://www.cancergenetics.com/-- develops, commercializes and
provides molecular- and biomarker-based tests and services,
including proprietary preclinical oncology and immuno-oncology
services, that enable biotech and pharmaceutical companies engaged
in oncology and immuno-oncology trials to better select candidate
populations and reduce adverse drug reactions by providing
information regarding genomic and molecular factors influencing
subject responses to therapeutics.  CGI operates across a global
footprint with locations in the United States, Australia, and
China.

Cancer Genetics reported a net loss of $20.37 million in 2018
following a net loss of $20.88 million in 2017.  At Sept. 30, 2019,
the Company had total assets of $20.83 million, total liabilities
of $13.37 million, and $7.46 million in total stockholders'
equity.

RSM US LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2010, issued a
"going concern" opinion in its report on the Company's consolidated
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses, and has an accumulated
deficit and negative cash flows from operations.  The Company is
also in violation of certain debt covenants.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


CAPSTONE LOGISTICS: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR on Refinancing
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B-' issuer credit rating on
Capstone Logistics Acquisition Inc., which plans to issue a $395
million first-lien term loan, $105 million second-lien term, and
$75 million revolving credit facility to refinance its entire
existing debt structure.

S&P also assigned its 'B-' issue-level rating and '3' recovery
rating (55% rounded estimate) to the proposed $75 million revolver
and $395 million first-lien term loan.

Although the transaction increases Capstone's debt levels modestly,
it alleviates any short-term liquidity concerns by extending
maturities.  Capstone will add around $50 million of secured debt
to its balance sheet (compared with a current total of around $525
million, including first- and second-lien term loan, and full
availability under revolver) through the larger revolver and
issuing new first- and second-lien debt that exceed the value of
its currently outstanding debt. The company plans to use some of
the additional debt to repay an outstanding bridge loan issued in
late 2019 to finance its acquisition of Priority Express, a last
mile delivery services provider for the e-commerce and healthcare
industries. However, with maturities being extended to 2025 and
beyond (proposed revolver due 2025, first-lien term loan due 2027,
and second-lien term loan due 2028), the transaction relieves
Capstone of all of its near-term maturities, since its existing
first-lien facilities matured in 2021 and second-lien term loan
matured in 2022.

The stable outlook on Capstone reflects S&P's belief that the
company's credit metrics will improve modestly over the next 12
months as the company benefits from organic growth in its core
freight-unloading business, and expands its presence in the newer
business segments. S&P expects debt to EBITDA to improve to around
7x in 2020 from the mid-7x area in 2019, while FFO to debt remains
in the mid-single-digit percent area over the same period.

"We could lower our ratings on Capstone over the next year if the
company pursues additional debt-financed acquisitions or if the
company experienced any unforeseen operational issues that could
weaken its operating results and lead us to believe that its
leverage or liquidity position is no longer sustainable," S&P
said.

"Although unlikely, we could raise our ratings on Capstone over the
next year if it generates better-than-expected operating results.
Specifically, debt to EBITDA below 6.5x and FFO to debt in the
high-single-digit percent area on a sustained basis. We would also
need to believe the company and its sponsors are committed to
maintaining its credit metrics within this range," the rating
agency said.


CARMEL MEDICAL: CIBM Objects to Debtor's Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------------
CIBM Bank, as a secured creditor, objects to the disclosure
statement explaining Carmel Medical Office Building, LLC's Chapter
11 Plan.

CIBM points out that the Debtor failed to disclose that the Debtor,
the Debtor's sole member, Carmel Investment Group, LLC ("CIG"), and
CIG's sole member and president of the Debtor, Zakir Khan ("Khan,"
together with CIG and the Debtor, the "Debtor Parties") were named
as defendants in the CIBM foreclosure.

CIBM further points out that the Debtor omitted references to the
condition of the Real Property, including any estimate of the
deferred maintenance costs, from its Disclosure Statement.

CIBM complains that the balance due and owing under the DIP Loan is
also unknown and was not disclosed in the Disclosure Statement.

CIBM asserts that the Disclosure Statement provides no clear
procedures for the sale or auction, including an adequate process
for secured lenders to credit bid under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 363(k).

According to CIBM, the Disclosure Statement provides no financials
or other information regarding Capitol, just boastful, third party
references to Capitol's supposed strong financial statements.

CIBM points out that the Disclosure Statement provides no
information regarding the new Kahn loan and includes no financial
information on Kahn.

CIBM Bank's Counsel:

     James A. Knauer
     Amanda D. Stafford
     KROGER, GARDIS & REGAS, LLP
     111 Monument Circle, Suite 900
     Indianapolis, IN 46204-5125
     Tel: (317) 692-9000
     Fax: (317) 264-6832
     E-mail: jknauer@kgrlaw.com
             astafford@kgrlaw.com

               About Carmel Medical Office Building

Carmel Medical Office Building, LLC, is a Single Asset Real Estate
Debtor.  The Company owns in fee simple a real property located at
10601 North Meridian Street Indianapolis, having a current value of
$5.3 million (based on offer received in 2019).

Carmel Medical Office Building, based in Carmel, IN, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 19-03536) on May 15,
2019.  In the petition signed by Zakir H. Khan, president, the
Debtor disclosed $6,125,000 in assets and $6,667,625 in
liabilities.  The Hon. James M. Carr oversees the case.  Jeffrey M.
Hester, Esq., a partner at Hester Baker Krebs LLC, is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


CARMEL MEDICAL: Debtor Objects to CIBM Plan Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Carmel Medical Office Building, LLC, filed an objection to
the Disclosure Statement Regarding the Chapter 11 Plan of
Liquidation filed by CIBM Bank for the Debtor.

The Debtor submits the CIBM Disclosure Statement does not contain
enough information about the auction proposed in the CIBM Plan.

The Debtor does not disagree with CIBM's analysis concerning why
CCI is paying $4,300,000 for the Real Estate, rather than the
$3,100,000 appraisal value: because CCI either has -- or thinks
it's going to get -- a valuable, long-term deal with Beltway to
lease the Real Property.

The Debtor points out that the CIBM Disclosure Statement is
inadequate because creditors should be advised that the auction is
unlikely to yield any overbids.

The Debtor further points out that the CIBM Disclosure Statement is
not adequate because it fails to classify Vasey Commercial Heating
& Air Conditioning ("Vasey") as a secured creditor.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Jeffrey M. Hester
     Hester Baker Krebs LLC
     One Indiana Square, Suite 1330
     Indianapolis, IN 46204
     Tel: 317.608.1129
     Fax: 317.833.3031
     E-mail: jhester@hbkfirm.com

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter, CIBM Bank filed a
Chapter 11 plan that provides for an auction sale of the Debtor's
Real Estate
within 30 days of the Confirmation Date.  The Auction will be
conducted by a Plan Agent appointed by the Court.  There is already
an offer to purchase the Real Estate from CCI 106th St., LLC
("CCI").  In exchange for making the opening bid and allowing other
bidders to know the minimum amount that must be bid to exceed the
current offer, CCI is known as a "Stalking Horse" and, should it be
outbid, may be paid a fee approved by the Court. CCI's current
offer for the Real Estate, subject to terms and conditions stated
therein, is $4,300,000.

A full-text copy of the CIBM Disclosure Statement dated Jan. 16,
2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/u9hqlgn from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

             About Carmel Medical Office Building

Carmel Medical Office Building, LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate
Debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The Company
owns in fee simple a real property located at 10601 North Meridian
Street Indianapolis, having a current value of $5.3 million (based
on offer received in 2019).

Carmel Medical Office Building, based in Carmel, IN, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 19-03536) on May 15,
2019.  In the petition signed by Zakir H. Khan, president, the
Debtor disclosed $6,125,000 in assets and $6,667,625 in
liabilities.  The Hon. James M. Carr oversees the case.  Jeffrey M.
Hester, Esq., a partner at Hester Baker Krebs LLC, is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


CARMEL MEDICAL: Vasey Heating Objects to CIMB Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------------
Vasey Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., submitted its objection to
the Disclosure Statement Regarding the Chapter 11 Plan of
Liquidation filed by CIBM Bank for debtor Carmel Medical Office
Building, LLC.

The Disclosure Statement should not be approved because it fails to
provide "adequate information" to creditors as required under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 1125.  Specifically, the Disclosure Statement: (i)
fails to account for the interests of Vasey as a secured creditor;
(ii) fails to provide sufficient bid procedures for a sale that is
at the heart of CIBM's plan of liquidation; (iii) fails to explain
how the Plan Agent will be selected; and (iv) fails to specify why
the proposed stalking horse bidder should be entitled to
significant bid protections.

Attorneys for Vasey Commercial Heating & Air Conditioning:

     Jonathan D. Sundheimer
     BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
     1 South Meridian Street
     Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
     Telephone: (317) 236-1313
     Facsimile: (317) 231-7433
     E-mail: jsundheimer@btlaw.com

               About Carmel Medical Office Building

Carmel Medical Office Building, LLC, is a Single Asset Real Estate
Debtor, as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).  The Company owns
in fee simple a real property located at 10601 North Meridian
Street Indianapolis, having a current value of $5.3 million (based
on offer received in 2019).

Carmel Medical Office Building, based in Carmel, IN, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 19-03536) on May 15,
2019.  In the petition signed by Zakir H. Khan, president, the
Debtor disclosed $6,125,000 in assets and $6,667,625 in
liabilities.  The Hon. James M. Carr oversees the case.  Jeffrey M.
Hester, Esq., a partner at Hester Baker Krebs LLC, is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


CELLA III: Girod LoanCo Says Plan Not Confirmable
-------------------------------------------------
Girod LoanCo, LLC, by far the largest creditor of this estate,
submitted an objection to approval of the Disclosure Statement for
Cella III LLC's Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization dated
Dec. 31, 2019.

Girod points out that the Disclosure Statement lacks adequate
information to allow creditors to make an informed judgment about
the plan in that it provides little to no information regarding the
values of the Debtors' assets, especially the Debtor's rationale
for valuing Girod's secured claim at $5.5 million, or roughly $2.5
million below its filed claim amount.

Girod further points out that the Debtor is involved in contested
litigation with its primary tenant which materially impacts this
bankruptcy.  A few sentences describing the litigation is hardly
sufficient.  Importantly, there is no mention made of the
substantial risk that a judgment could not be collected against
EJGH because it is a municipality.

According to Girod that the court should not approve the disclosure
statement because it relates to a plan that cannot be confirmed as
a matter of law.

Girod complains that it goes without saying that creating a
separate class and treatment for a secured creditor like Girod is
routine and appropriate to account for any deficiency claim. But
placing that deficiency claim in a separate class but treated
identically as other unsecured creditors is an improper
gerrymandering of the vote.

Girod points out that the Debtor will not be able to establish a
business justification for the separate classification of Girod.

Girod further points out that the Plan is unrealistically
optimistic about the litigation with EJGH, in large part in order
to justify awarding existing equity 100% of the reorganized
interests at confirmation.

Attorneys for Girod LoanCo, LLC:

     Brett P. Furr
     Michael A. Crawford
     John A. Milazzo, Jr.
     TAYLOR, PORTER, BROOKS &PHILLIPS L.L.P.
     Post Office Box 2471
     450 Laurel Street, 8th Floor
     Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-2471
     Tel: (225) 387-3221
     Fax: (225) 346-8049

                       About Cella III LLC

Cella III, LLC, a company based in Metairie, La., filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 19-11528) on June 5, 2019.
In the petition signed by George A. Cella, III, member and manager,
the Debtor was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Jerry A. Brown oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Congeni Law Firm, LLC as bankruptcy counsel;
Sternberg, Naccari & White, LLC as special counsel; and Patrick J.
Gros, CPA, APAC as accountant.


CELLA III: US Trustee Seeks Details of Equity Contribution in Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
David W. Asbach, Acting United States Trustee for Region 5, objects
to the Disclosure Statement.

UST points out while the means of implementation refer to an
"equity contribution" to be made (see Disclosure, Sec. IV (C), pg
15), nowhere in the Disclosure is there a description of the equity
contribution.

UST further points out that the description of causes of action to
be retained is nonspecific, and insufficient information exists of
the dollar amount of any judgment or when sums from litigation may
be paid for creditors to determine the distribution they can expect
to receive.

UST asserts that the Disclosure fails to give an estimate of
professional and administrative claims of the Debtor.

UST complains that Debtor has failed to attach a pro forma
describing its projected income and expenses to the Disclosure.

According to UST, the Disclosure describes a plan which violates
the absolute priority rule and cannot be confirmed.

                     About Cella III LLC

Cella III, LLC, a company based in Metairie, La., filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 19-11528) on June 5, 2019.
In the petition signed by George A. Cella, III, member and manager,
the Debtor was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Jerry A. Brown oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Congeni Law Firm, LLC as bankruptcy counsel;
Sternberg, Naccari & White, LLC as special counsel; and Patrick J.
Gros, CPA, APAC as accountant.


CHHATRALA GRAND: Unsecureds to Get $25K from $11M Sale
------------------------------------------------------
Chhatrala Grand Rapids, LLC, et al., filed a Third Amended
Disclosure Statement explaining their Chapter 11 Plan of
Liquidation.

It is proposed that all assets of the Debtors other than excluded
assets such as avoidance actions will be sold to Access Point or a
designee pursuant to a credit bid in the amount of $11,000,000
which will preserve the going concern value of the hotel and
preserve jobs for the hotel workers.  Access will also pay $25,000
to be distributed to general unsecured creditors, $153,000 which
will be set forth in the APA for a professional fee escrow, and
$50,000 which will be set forth in the APA to Bhavneet Bhogal for
her work in preserving the going concern value for the hotel while
her husband, Surinder Bhogal, has had significant medical issues.

Secured Claims with total claim of $15,983,540.  Priority Claims
with total claim of $147,875.  The Debtors believe that there are
general unsecured claims in the amount of approximately $6,600,000
which includes deficiency claims.

Attorney for Debtors:

     Mark H. Shapiro
     STEINBERG SHAPIRO & CLARK
     25925 Telegraph Road, Suite 203
     Southfield, MI 48033
     Tel: 248-352-4700
     E-mail: shapiro@steinbergshapiro.com

Co-counsel for Debtors:

     Robert N. Bassel, Esq.
     P.O. Box T
     Clinton, MI 49236
     Tel: (248) 677-1234
     E-mail: bbassel@gmail.com

              About Chhatrala Grand Rapids and
                      Bhogal Enterprises

Chhatrala Grand Rapids, LLC, and its affiliate Bhogal Enterprises,
LLC, operate hotels and motels.  

Chhatrala Grand and Bhogal Enterprises sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Lead Case No.
19-03908) on Sept. 16, 2019.

At the time of the filing, Chhatrala Grand had estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of between $10 million and $50
million while Bhogal Enterprises had estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of between $100,000 and $500,000.  

The case is assigned to Judge John T. Gregg.  

The Debtor is represented by Mark H. Shapiro, Esq., at Steinberg
Shapiro & Clark.


CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC: Moody's Confirms B1 CFR, Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service confirmed Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. B1
Corporate Family Rating, B1-PD Probability of Default rating and
its B3 senior unsecured notes rating. Moody's downgraded Cliffs
guaranteed senior secured notes to Ba3 from Ba2, and its guaranteed
senior unsecured notes to B2 from B1. At the same time, Moody's
assigned a Ba3 rating to Cliffs new $550 million guaranteed senior
secured notes due 2028, and a B2 rating to the company's new $400
million senior unsecured guaranteed notes due 2028. The Speculative
Grade Liquidity Rating was lowered to SGL-2 from SGL-1. The outlook
is negative.

This concludes the review for downgrade initiated on December 3,
2019.

Proceeds from the new debt issuance will be used to refinance AK
Steel Corporation's outstanding senior secured notes due 2023 and
senior unsecured notes due 2021 upon closing of the merger between
Cliffs and AK Steel. The merger has received early termination of
the waiting period under the Hart Scott Rodino Act (HSR Act) in
addition to clearance from the Mexican Competition Commission and
pursuant to the Competition Act (Canada). The registration
statement with the SEC has also been deemed effective. The
transaction remains subject to shareholder votes by shareholders of
both Cliffs and AK Steel.

The confirmation of the B1 CFR reflects the fact that the final
terms of the transaction are unchanged from the original
announcement, the transaction remains debt neutral for the combined
companies and market conditions remain acceptable, particularly
with the improvement in recent months in steel prices. The
downgrade in Cliffs' guaranteed senior secured notes and guaranteed
senior unsecured notes reflects the changes in the capital
structure following the refinancing of AK Steel's debt.

Following completion of the merger, the rating methodology for
Cliffs will be changed to the Steel Industry methodology (September
13, 2017) as the majority of revenues will be generated from the
steel segment of the business. This does not result in a rating
change.

Confirmations:

Issuer: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Confirmed B1

Probability of Default Rating, Confirmed at B1-PD

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Confirmed at B3 (LGD6)
from (LGD5)

Downgrades:

Issuer: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-2 from SGL-1

Gtd Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to Ba3 (LGD3)
from Ba2 (LGD2)

Gtd Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to B2
(LGD4) from B1 (LGD4)

Assignments:

Issuer: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Gtd Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned Ba3 (LGD3)

Gtd Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B2 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Rating Under Review

RATINGS RATIONALE

Cliffs B1 CFR reflects the company's cushion within the B1 rating
category to absorb the increase in debt from the assumption of AK
Steel's obligations. Improved operating performance, liability
management and debt reduction and the strengthened debt protection
metrics are factors contributing to the cushion in the rating. The
transaction provides Cliffs with a captive source of sales for its
iron ore pellets as AK Steel is one of its largest customers.
Cliffs will also continue to have third party sales. Additionally,
the ability to supply HBI to the electric arc furnace (EAF) steel
producers (account for roughly 70% of steel produced in the US and
will continue to increase) in replacement of imported pig iron,
upon completion of the HBI plant, will contribute to increased
market share. The HBI plant remains on schedule for start-up in
June 2020 with full capacity being reached in 2021. Cliffs now has
major EAF customers on a commercial basis for its HBI production.

The rating also considers the diversification of Cliffs business
foot print from a single commodity with high customer concentration
to a more integrated producer of iron ore and steel. Additionally,
the combination of the companies will allow for a more balanced
performance on a quarterly basis than the extreme seasonality seen
in Cliffs' business on a stand-alone basis.

The rating anticipates that AK Steel's cost profile will benefit
from more competitively priced iron ore pellets helping to improve
its EBITDA/ton performance. AK Steel's strong position supplying
the automotive end market on a contract basis (roughly 66% of
revenues) and continued focus on value added products through
Precision Partners and AK Tube, as well as the continued
development and roll out of next gen and high strength steels also
support the expected improvement in performance. While light
vehicle sales in the automotive sector have softened, Moody's
expects US light vehicle sales in the US of 16.9MM units in 2020.

A roughly 5.8% decline in sales volume in 2019, which drove a lower
sales margin, driven primarily by the roughly 5.8% decline in
realized prices and lower pellet premiums contributed to lower
operating income. This was most impactful in the fourth quarter,
which also considers the need to true-up volumes under a contract
that also contains a component of hot-rolled coil (HRC) steel
pricing. Given the decline in HRC prices over the course of 2019,
this true-up was negative. HRC prices bottomed in October 2019 (at
around $463/ton) and are currently around $578 ton, which will be a
favorable benefit to 2020. The earnings compression contributed to
a more highly leveraged position reflected by the increase in
debt/EBITDA to roughly 4.3x in 2019 from 2.7x in 2018.

While Cliffs free cash flow was negative in 2019 due to the ongoing
strategic investment in its HBI plant, and share repurchases, this
is expected to turn positive in 2020 as the expenditures associated
with the HBI project are completed and the project comes on line
and provides increasing profitability over time. The cash flow gap
was covered from existing cash balances.

Initially, leverage of the combined companies, as measured by
Moody's pro forma adjusted debt/EBITDA ratio for the year ended
December 31, 2019 of about 5.2x is somewhat high for the rating,
reflecting the increase in unfunded pension liabilities associated
with AK Steel. This is expected to moderate within a reasonable
time frame on earnings improvement, although on an adjusted basis
will remain somewhat elevated in 2020. Additionally, Cliffs expects
$120 million in annual cost synergies, which have not been fully
considered in the pro forma leverage ratio.

With respect to the iron ore markets, the rating continues to
incorporate volatility in iron ore prices, hot-rolled prices (to
which certain contracts have a component in their pricing) and the
Atlantic seaborne pellet premium. With respect to the steel
business being acquired, the rating incorporates volatility in
steel prices, end market demand, and the challenge from competing
materials such as aluminum.

The SGL-2 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating reflects the company's
good liquidity position as evidenced by Cliffs cash position of
roughly $353 million at December 31, 2019. Liquidity is also
supported by a $450 million ABL, which expires the earlier of
February 28, 2023 or a date that is 60 days prior to the maturity
of existing debt as defined in the ABL. The facility contains a 1:1
fixed charge coverage requirement should availability be less than
the greater of 10% of the aggregate facility and $35 million.

The company intends at closing of the merger to have a $2 billion
asset based lending (ABL) facility replacing its current $450
million ABL and AK Steel's $1.5 billion ABL. The SGL-2 considers
the expected negative initial free cash flow and the likelihood of
borrowings to support the refinancing of AK Steel's debt.

The negative outlook reflects the challenging steel environment and
low although improved steel prices as well as the need to achieve
the expected improvement in AK Steel's EBITDA/ton. The challenging
environment for the steel industry can have repercussions on iron
ore suppliers should demand requirements be reduced. The outlook
also considers the start-up risks associated with the HBI facility
although it remains on time and on budget for commercial production
in the first half of 2020. The negative outlook also incorporates
the operating and integration risks associated with the acquisition
of AK Steel.

An upgrade to the CFR would require the combined company to
demonstrate the ability to sustain leverage, as measured by the
debt/EBITDA ratio of no more than 3.5x through various price
points, (CFO-dividends)/Debt of at least 25% and maintain good
liquidity. The CFR could be downgrade should leverage remain
elevated at or above 4x, (CFO-dividends)/debt be less than 15% and
liquidity tighten.

As an integrated steel producer, Cliffs will face a number of
environmental risks related to both the mining industry and the
steel industry. By the nature of its business, Cliffs mining
business faces a number of environmental risks typical for a
company in the mining industry, including but not limited to
wastewater discharges, site remediation and mine closures, tailings
management, air emissions and social responsibility. The company is
subject to many and varied environmental laws and regulations in
areas where it operates. On its environmental heat map, the mining
sector overall is viewed as a very high-risk sector for soil
pollution and use restrictions and a high-risk sector for water
shortages and natural and man-made hazards. AK Steel, like all
producers in the global steel sector, particularly blast furnace
producers, faces pressure to reduce greenhouse gas and air
pollution emissions, among a number of other sustainability issues
and will likely incur costs to meet increasingly stringent
regulations. From a governance perspective, Cliffs in recent years
has demonstrated a good focus on liability management and this is
expected to continue given the volatility in pricing in both the
iron ore and steel markets. In this regard, the company is expected
to remain focused on liability management and the level of debt in
the capital structure. Succession planning remains a consideration
given the role of the Chairman, President and CEO in guiding the
company through its transformation since 2014.

Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Cleveland-Cliffs is the largest
iron ore producer in North America with approximately 21.2 million
equity tons of annual capacity. Commercial production at the
Toledo, Ohio HBI facility is expected to begin mid-2020. For the
twelve months ended December 31, 2019 Cliffs had revenues of $2
billion.

Headquartered in West Chester, Ohio, AK Steel Corporation (AK
Steel) ranks as a middle tier integrated steel producer, operating
steelmaking and finishing plants in Ontario in Canada, Indiana,
Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania in United States. The
company also has tube manufacturing facilities in Indiana, Ohio,
and Mexico. Additionally, through its Precision Partners, AK Steel
is involved in engineering, tooling, die design and hot and cold
stamped steel parts. AK Steel produces flat-rolled carbon steels,
including coated, cold-rolled and hot-rolled products, as well as
specialty stainless and electrical steels. Principal end markets
include automotive, steel service centers, appliance, industrial
machinery, infrastructure, construction, and distributors and
converters. Through its AK Coal Resources Inc. subsidiary, the
company has interests in metallurgical coal production. Revenues
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 were approximately
$6.4 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Mining
published in September 2018.


COASTAL HOME: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 16% Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Home Care, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 plan that provides for
the Debtor to fund plan payments through the continued business
operations of the Debtor.

The average monthly gross revenue of $189,519 is sufficient to
support payments to secured, priority, unsecured, disputed and
insider claimants.

The Class 1 claim of Micheal J. Jones II is IMPAIRED.  The balance
owed to Mr. Moses is $200,000.  The Debtor will pay the secured
creditor of class 1 in full over 5 years by making 15 quarterly
payments at 3% annual interest.  The payments will be $13,602
beginning with the first calendar quarter after the order
confirming the plan.

Class 2 General Unsecured Creditors are IMPAIRED.  Allowed general
unsecured claims will be paid a total of $52,000 over 5 years, pro
rata distribution.  The Payment to unsecured creditors will be $867
per month.  Undisputed unsecured creditors will receive
distributions valued at 16 cents on the dollar.

Class 3 Shareholders of the Debtor are IMPAIRED.  They will receive
payment after all other classes are paid.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 19, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/wwfheo8 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorney for the Plan Proponent:

     Jake C. Blanchard
     BLANCHARD LAW, P.A.
     1501 S. Belcher., 2B
     Largo, FL 33771
     Tel: 727-531-7068
     Fax: 727-535-2086
     E-mail: jake@jakeblanchardlaw.com

                   About Coastal Home Care

Coastal Home Care, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-07259) on July 31, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Jake C. Blanchard, Esq., at Blanchard Law, P.A.


CONTURA ENERGY: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3 & Alters Outlook to Neg.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Contura Energy, Inc.'s
Corporate Family Rating to B3 from B2, senior secured term loan to
Caa1 from B3, and Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating to SGL-3 from
SGL-2. The rating outlook has been revised to negative from
stable.

"Contura Energy is expected to experience significant margin
compression due to lower metallurgical coal prices and burn cash in
2020," said Ben Nelson, Moody's Vice President -- Senior Credit
Officer and lead analyst for Contura Energy, Inc.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Contura Energy, Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B3-PD from B2-PD

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-3 from
  SGL-2

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B3 from B2

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to Caa1 (LGD4)
  from B3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Contura Energy, Inc.

  Outlook, Changed To Negative From Stable

RATING RATIONALE

Moody's expects a very challenging year for the coal industry in
2020. Domestic demand for thermal coal is challenged by a mild
winter season, historically low natural gas prices, and ongoing
reduction of the fleet of coal-fired power plants. A substantive
reduction in export prices has redirected coal back into the
weakened domestic market, further reducing prices in early 2020
following a weak 2019. Likewise, metallurgical coal fell sharply in
the second half of 2019 and, while the met coal market has
evidenced some stability in early 2020, there is no near-term
catalyst for substantive and sustained price improvement. Business
conditions for the global steel industry remain weak, particularly
in Europe where Contura exports a majority of its metallurgical
coal. Management has been taking action to reduce cash costs from
about $82/short ton in 4Q19 to the $76-81/short ton in 2020.
However, based on export metallurgical coal pricing anticipated
near the midpoint of its range of $110-170 per metric ton (CFR
Jingtang) and incorporating adjustments for the quality and
location of the company's coal, Moody's expects that Contura Energy
will generate $125-175 million of management-defined EBITDA in
2020, down meaningfully from $335 million in 2018 and $264 million
for the nine months ended 30 September 2019, and will consume cash
in the current environment of low prices for the company's grades
of metallurgical coal at ports on the East Coast. Moody's also
expects that the company's thermal coal platform will generate
modest losses. Credit metrics will weaken considerably for the
rating, including adjusted financial leverage above 3.5x
(Debt/EBITDA).

Moody's also believes that investor concerns about the coal
industry's ESG profile are intensifying and coal producers will be
increasingly challenged by intensifying access to capital issues in
the early 2020s. An increasing portion of the global investment
community is reducing or eliminating exposure to the coal industry
with greater emphasis on moving away from thermal coal. The
aggregate impact on the credit quality of the coal industry is that
debt capital will become more expensive over this horizon,
particularly in the public bond markets, and other business
requirements, such as surety bonds, which together will lead to
much more focus on individual coal producers' ability to fund their
operations and articulate clearly their approach to addressing
environmental, social, and governance considerations -- including
reducing net debt in the near-to-medium term. Contura reported
about $600 million of debt and $227 million of surety bonds to
support reclamation-related items at 30 September 2019.

The B3 CFR is principally constrained by the inherent volatility in
the metallurgical coal industry and ongoing secular decline in the
thermal coal industry that make it challenging to operate with a
leveraged balance sheet over the rating horizon. The rating also
reflects ongoing regulatory pressures on the coal mining industry
despite improved political support since late 2016, inherent
geologic and operational risks associated with mining, and
environmental and social risks specific to the coal industry. The
rating benefits from moderate operating diversity, meaningful coal
reserves, access to multiple transportation options, and adequate
liquidity. Contura's rating also considers meaningful legacy
liabilities, including some mining-specific items, such asset
retirement obligations related to the impact of coal mining on the
environment, and coal-specific items, such as black lung
liabilities related to negative health impacts on mining
employees.

The negative outlook reflects the expectation for cash consumption
in 2020. Moody's could downgrade the rating with expectations for
available liquidity to fall below $225 million or cash to fall
below $100 million. Further deterioration in metallurgical coal
prices or expected realized prices could also have negative rating
implications. Moody's could upgrade the rating with expectations
for adjusted financial leverage to remain below 3.5x (Debt/EBITDA),
free cash flow in excess of $25 million, and good liquidity to
support operations.

The SGL-3 balances more than $300 million of available liquidity
with expectations for cash consumption in 2020 and meaningful
sensitivity to changes in metallurgical coal prices. Moody's
expects that the company will generate negative free cash flow in
2019 -- based on expectations for about $50 million of cash
interest and capital spending in the guided range of $175-$195
million that includes some spending on multiple development
projects. Contura Energy disclosed in an earnings preannouncement
that the company has $213 million of cash and $115 million of
availability under a $225 million asset-based revolving credit
facility at 31 December 2019. The asset-based revolving credit
facility is used for letters of credit ($49 million at 30 September
2019) and some collateral limitations due to the asset-based nature
of the facility. The revolver has a springing fixed charge coverage
ratio test, which Moody's does not expect will be triggered in
2020, and the term loan does not have financial maintenance
covenants.

Environmental, social, and governance factors are important factors
influencing Contura's credit quality. The company is exposed to ESG
issues typical for a company in the coal mining industry, including
increasing global demand for renewable energy that is detrimental
to demand for thermal coal, especially in the United States and
Western Europe. From an environmental perspective the coal mining
sector is also viewed as: (i) very high risk for air pollution and
carbon regulations; (ii) high risk for soil and water pollution,
land use restrictions, and natural and man-made hazards; and (iii)
moderate risk for water shortages. Social issues include factors
such as community relations, operational track record, and health
and safety issues associated with coal mining, such as black lung
disease. Contura Energy is exposed to both thermal coal and
metallurgical coal, though the company's thermal coal business does
not generate meaningful earnings and cash flows. Moody's believes
that thermal coal carries greater ESG-related risks than
metallurgical coal. Governance-related risks are higher than
average for publicly-traded mining companies, incorporating an
aggressive approach to shareholder returns, including more than $30
million of share repurchases in the third quarter of 2019, and
recent change in the company's chief executive officer in 2019.

Following a merger with ANR, Inc. and Alpha Natural Resources
Holdings, Inc. in November 2018, Contura now operates 23
underground mines, 9 surface mines and 12 preparation plants in the
Northern Appalachia and Central Appalachia regions. Contura
produced about 25 million tons of coal in 2018 in Central
Appalachia and Northern Appalachia regions, split about evenly
between thermal coal and metallurgical coal. The company also has
65% stake in the Dominion Terminal Associates coal export terminal
in eastern Virginia. Contura generated $2.4 billion of revenue for
the twelve months ended September 30, 2019.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Mining
published in September 2018.


COOK & BOARDMAN: Moody's Assigns B3 Rating on New $25MM Term Loan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 rating to The Cook &
Boardman Group, LLC's proposed $25 million delayed-draw term loan,
which will be used for future acquisitions. Terms and conditions
are identical to the company's existing term loan. The B3 rating on
the company's existing senior secured term loan due 2025, which is
being increased to $295 million from $245 million is not impacted.
Proceeds from the incremental $50 million term loan will be used to
repay revolver borrowings, which were used mainly for previous
acquisitions. The increased term loan along with equity contributed
by affiliates of Littlejohn & Co. (Littlejohn), primary owner of
C&B, will also be used to fund an acquisition. C&B's B3 Corporate
Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating are not
affected by the proposed transactions. The outlook remains stable.

Moody's views the proposed upsizing of the term loan as credit
positive, since C&B is adding to its liquidity by terming out
revolver borrowings. Additionally, the proposed acquisition expands
C&B's geographic reach into Southeast Pennsylvania, furthering the
company's growth strategy in the mid-Atlantic region, and provides
new product.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by the actions:

Assignments:

Issuer: Cook & Boardman Group, LLC (The)

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B3 (LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

C&B's B3 CFR reflects its high leverage. Moody's projects adjusted
debt-to-LTM EBITDA in the 6.25x -- 6.5x range by year-end 2020, and
interest coverage, measured as EBITA-to-interest expense, at about
1.5x -- 1.75x (ratios include Moody's standard adjustments).
Additional interest payments and term loan amortization aggregating
to about $6 million per year remain manageable for C&B, but the
company will generate very little free cash flow relative to debt.
Providing an offset to C&B's leveraged debt capital structure are
sound fundamentals in non-residential construction, a primary
driver of C&B's revenues, that support growth. Revolver
availability and no near-term maturities are key liquidity
enhancers.

Governance characteristics Moody's considers in C&B's credit
profile is an aggressive financial policy evidenced by its high
leverage. Moody's believes that Littlejohn's investment in C&B is
still early, having acquired the company in October 2018. Hence,
Moody's expects ongoing acquisitions to build scale rather than
Littlejohn monetizing its investment in C&B.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that C&B will
perform well and maintain leverage below 6.5x. Moody's also expects
that acquisitions will be integrated without material problems and
industry fundamentals will support growth over the next twelve
months.

The rating could be upgraded if (all ratios include Moody's
standard adjustments):

  -- Debt-to-LTM EBITDA is sustained near 5.0x

  -- EBITA-to-interest expense remains above 2.5x

  -- Liquidity profile is improved

  -- Ongoing positive trends in end markets support organic growth

The rating could be downgraded if:

  -- Debt-to-EBITDA is maintained above 6.5x

  -- EBITA-to-interest is sustained below 1.0x

  -- The company's liquidity profile deteriorates

The principal methodology used in this rating was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry was published in June 2018.

The Cook & Boardman Group, LLC, headquartered in Winston-Salem,
North Carolina, is a national distributor of commercial doors and
related products primarily used in commercial applications.
Littlejohn & Co., through its affiliates, is the primary owner of
C&B. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 was about $485
million. C&B is privately owned and does not disclose financial
information publicly.


CREATIVE GLOBAL: Seeks to Borrow from CEO on Unsecured Basis
------------------------------------------------------------
Creative Global Investment Inc. seeks permission from the
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to obtain
$20,000 of post-petition financing from Dong Yeoun Lee, the
Debtor's chairman, chief executive and sole shareholder, on an
as-needed basis to cover shortfalls in the Debtor's 13-week
operating budget covering the period from March 16, 2020 through
and including June 14, 2020.  Mr. Lee offers this fifth DIP loan
free of interest.

A copy of the motion is available free of charge at
https://is.gd/WOXtSH from PacerMonitor.com.

Hearing on the motion is scheduled for March 4, 2020 at 9 a.m.
                                       
              About Creative Global Investment

Creative Global Investment Inc. is a privately held company engaged
in financial investment activities.  Creative Global Investment
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-13044) on March 20, 2019.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor disclosed $36,691 in assets and $5,388,873 in
liabilities.  The case has been assigned to Judge Sandra R. Klein.
Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


CTI INDUSTRIES: Amends Purchase Agreement with LF International
---------------------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed on a Current Report on Form 8-K of CTI
Industries Corporation, on Jan. 3, 2020, the Company entered into a
stock purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company agreed to
issue and sell, and LF International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore private
limited company, agreed to purchase, up to 500,000 shares of the
Company's newly created Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, with
each share of Series A Preferred initially convertible into ten
shares of the Company's common stock, at a purchase price of $10.00
per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $5,000,000.  On Jan. 13,
2020, the Company conducted its first closing of the Offering,
resulting in aggregate gross proceeds of $2,500,000.

The Purchase Agreement contemplates a second closing for the
purchase and sale of an additional 250,000 shares of Series A
Preferred, which is subject to certain closing conditions. However,
on Feb. 24, 2020, to permit an interim closing prior to the
satisfaction of the relevant closing conditions to, and the
consummation of, the Second Closing, the Company and the Investor
entered into an amendment to the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to
which the Company agreed to issue and sell, and the Investor agreed
to purchase, 70,000 shares of Series A Preferred at a purchase
price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of
$700,000.  As an inducement to enter into the Purchase Agreement
Amendment, the Company i) granted to the Investor the right to
appoint and elect a second member to the Companys Board of
Directors and ii) agreed to issue to the Investor 140,'000 shares
of the Company's common stock.

As permitted by the Purchase Agreement, the Company may, in its
discretion, issue up to an additional 200,000 shares of Series A
Preferred for a purchase price of $10.00 per share.  On Feb. 21,
2020, the Company sold 22,060 shares of Series A Preferred for an
aggregate purchase price of $220,600.

                          About CTI

Headquartered in Lake Barrington, Illinois, CTI Industries
Corporation -- http://www.ctiindustries.com/-- designs,
manufactures and distributes metalized and latex balloon products
throughout the world and operates systems for the production,
lamination, coating and printing of films used for food packaging
and other commercial uses and for conversion of films to flexible
packaging containers and other products.

CTI reported a net loss of $3.74 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2018, following a net loss of $1.78 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had $32.90
million in total assets, $28.16 million in total current
liabilities, $2.79 million in total long-term liabilities, and
$1.95 million in total equity.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, in Chicago, Illinois, the Company's auditor
since 2007, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 15, 2019, citing that the Company has suffered net
losses from operations and liquidity limitations that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


CUMBERLAND BEHAVIOR: Addresses Objections to Plan Docs
------------------------------------------------------
In response to the objections filed by the United States Trustee
and the Commonwealth of Kentucky, Cabinet for Health and Family
Services, Department of Medicaid Services, debtor Cumberland
Behavior Group LLC filed an amendment to its Small Business Chapter
11 Plan with Disclosures.

A. 2019 Business Income

According to the Debtor's Medicaid RA report for 2019, it had total
claim receipts of $5,776,158.36.

B. Distributions/Payments to Insiders

In addition to previously disclosed insider payments, Debtor
discloses that it paid $51,875 to Prestige Worldwide Properties in
the year prior to bankruptcy for leased home units. In addition to
salary and FHP payments, Debtor paid distributions to members: Ace
Jones, II totaling $60,488 and $37,691 for 2018 and 2017 and to
Mark Fannin in the amount of $ 4,909 and $2,429 respectively for
2018 and 2017.

C. Monthly Operating Income/Expenses

Since filing its Plan, Debtor has filed operating reports for the
months of November and December (ECF Nos 124 and 125).  According
to its monthly operating reports, Debtor had income of $449,148.24
in November and $446,271.57 in expenses that month.  The Debtor
reported income of $415,380.16 for December and expenses of
$401,241.67 for the month.

D. Medicaid Claim
The Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Department of Medicaid
Services (the "Cabinet") filed an unsecured proof of claim (POC #6)
in the amount of $705,772.16 for recoupment of alleged Medicaid
claims improperly paid to the Debtor.  The Debtor disputes this
claim and reserves all rights, claims, defenses, appeals etc. with
respect to the claim.  There was a previous action in Franklin
Circuit Court dealing with the claim and other actions by the
Cabinet.

E. Treatment of Amanda Fannin Insider Claim

Amanda Fannin, spouse of Mark Fannin, will receive no distributions
under the Plan on account of her insider loan to the Debtor. In
exchange for waiver of right to receive distributions, the Debtor
will waive any claims against Mrs. Fannin.

A full-text copy of the Amendment to the Debtor's Small Business
Chapter 11 Plan with Disclosures dated Feb. 17, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/s396y6p from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

Counsel for the Debtor:

     Jamie L. Harris
     200 North Upper Street
     Lexington, KY 40507
     Telephone: (859) 231-5800
     Facsimile: (859) 281-1179
     E-mail: jharris@dlgfirm.com

                   About Cumberland Behavior

Cumberland Behavior Group LLC is a provider of community living
based services to persons with intellectual disabilities.
Cumberland Behavior Group sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
E.D.Kay. Case No. 19-61027) on Aug. 12, 2019.  In the petition
signed by Ace R. Jones, II, member, the Debtor was estimated to
have assets of no more than $50,000, and liabilities at $1 million
to $10 million.  The Hon. Gregory R. Schaaf is the case judge.
Delcotto Law Group PLLC is the Debtor's counsel.


DAK RESOURCES: Case Summary & 19 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: DAK Resources, Inc.
        50 North Laura Street
        25th Floor
        Jacksonville, FL 3220

Business Description: DAK Resources is a provider of staffing
                      services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 28, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 20-00728

Debtor's Counsel: Edward P. Jackson, esq.
                  EDWARD P. JACKSON, P.A.
                  Fla Bar No. 286648
                  255 N. Liberty Street, 1st Floor
                  Jacksonville, FL 32202-2820
                  Tel: 904-358-1952
                  E-mail: edward@edwardpjackson.com,
                          traci@edwardpjackson.com,
                          linda@edwardpjackson.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by David Moorefield, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 19 unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/CksCpo


DANCOR TRANSIT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Dancor Transit, Inc.
           d/b/a DTI Management Corp
        625 Kerr Road
        Van Buren, AR 72956

Business Description: Dancor Transit Inc. is a trucking company
                      headquartered in Van Buren, Arkansas.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 27, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Arkansas

Case No.: 20-70536

Debtor's Counsel: Kevin P. Keech, Esq.
                  KEECH LAW FIRM, PA
                  2011 South Broadway
                  Little Rock, AR 72206
                  Tel: 501-221-3200
                  E-mail: kkeech@keechlawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Dan Bearden, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                      https://is.gd/3sIt9v


DIAMOND PERFECTION: April 14 Filing of Plan and Disclosures
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse has granted Diamond Perfection,
Inc., an extension of the deadline for filing plan and disclosure
statement is extended through and including April 14, 2020.

Diamond Perfection, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-03270) on July 18, 2019, estimating less than
$500,000 in both assets and liabilities.  James B. Angell, Esq., at
HOWARD, STALLINGS, FROM, ATKINS, ANGELL & DAVIS, P.A., is the
Debtor's counsel.







DIOCESE OF BUFFALO: 2nd in NY to Fall Due to Child Victims Act
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Diocese of Buffalo filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy to deal with
sexual abuse claims, becoming the latest entity to seek financial
protection after a 2019 state law allowed victims of historical
childhood sexual assault to sue.

The State of New York in January 2019 passed the Child Victims Act,
a law that modified the statute of limitations and created a
one-year "window" during which victims of child abuse claims may
have been time-barred may commence a timely civil action.  Hundreds
of lawsuits have been filed against churches and other institutions
since the law took effect August 2019.  

The Diocese of Rochester New York sought bankruptcy protection in
September 2019, the first of eight catholic dioceses in New York to
declare bankruptcy due to the Child Victims Act.

The Diocese of Buffalo, the largest in upstate New York, said in a
statement that its filing was necessary to continue uninterrupted
its mission throughout Western New York, while working to settle
claims with existing Diocesan assets and insurance coverages.

"We have no more urgent work than to bring about justice and
healing for those harmed by the scourge of sexual abuse. The
intense emotional, mental and spiritual pain inflicted on these
innocent victim-survivors is a heavy burden they are forced to
carry throughout their lives," said Bishop Edward B.
Scharfenberger, Apostolic Administrator of the Diocese of Buffalo.
"Our decision to pursue Chapter 11 reorganization -- arrived at
after much prayer, discernment and consultation with the College of
Consultors and our Diocesan Finance Council -- is based on our
belief that this approach will enable the most number of
victim-survivors of past sexual abuse in achieving fairness and a
sense of restorative justice for the harm they have experienced. It
will also allow the vital, mission-driven work of faith that is so
essential to the residents of Western New York to continue
uninterrupted."

Parishes of the Diocese are separately incorporated under New York
State's Religious Corporation Law and not included in the Feb. 28
bankruptcy filing.  Similarly, Catholic elementary and secondary
schools are also not part of the Chapter 11 case, given that they
are owned by parishes or are separately incorporated entities.  The
Catholic Charities of Buffalo and the Diocese's capital and
endowment Campaign-Upon This Rock are not part of the filing.

The Diocese of Buffalo became the 21st diocese to seek bankruptcy
protection in the U.S.  Most recently, the Roman Catholic Diocese
of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, filed Feb. 19.

             About The Diocese of Buffalo

The Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y., is home to nearly 600,000 Catholics
over eight counties in Western New York.  The territory of the
Diocese is co-extensive with the counties of Erie, Niagara,
Genesee, Orleans, Chautauqua, Wyoming, Cattaraugus and Allegany in
New York State, comprising 161 parishes.  There are 144 diocesan
priests and 84 religious priests who reside in the Diocese.

The Diocese through its central administrative offices (a) provides
operational support to the Catholic parishes, schools and certain
other Catholic entities that operate within the territory of the
Diocese "OCE"; (b) conducts school operations through which it
provides parish schools with financial and educational support; (c)
provides comprehensive risk management services to the OCEs; (d)
administers a lay pension trust and a priest pension trust for the
benefit of certain employees and priests of the OCEs; and (e)
provides administrative support for St. Joseph Investment Fund,
Inc.

Dealing with sexual abuse claims, the Diocese of Buffalo, New York,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 20-10322) on
Feb. 28, 2020.

The Diocese was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Carl L. Bucki is the case judge.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, led by Stephen A. Donato, Esq., is
the Debtor's counsel.  Stretto is the claims agent, maintaining the
page https://case.stretto.com/dioceseofbuffalo/docket


DIOCESE OF BUFFALO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: The Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y.
        795 Main Street
        Buffalo, NY 14203

Business Description: The Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y., through its
                      central administrative offices (a) provides
                      operational support to the Catholic
                      parishes, schools and certain other Catholic
                      entities that operate within the territory
                      of the Diocese "OCE"; (b) conducts school
                      operations through which it provides parish
                      schools with financial and educational
                      support; (c) provides comprehensive risk
                      management services to the OCEs; (d)
                      administers a lay pension trust and a priest
                      pension trust for the benefit of certain
                      employees and priests of the OCEs; and (e)
                      provides administrative support for St.
                      Joseph Investment Fund, Inc.  The Diocese is
                      a not-for-profit Religious Corporation under

                      New York State law.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 28, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of New York

Case No.: 20-10322

Judge: Hon. Carl L. Bucki

Debtor's Counsel: Stephen A. Donato, Esq.
                  BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC
                  One Lincoln Center
                  Syracuse, NY 13202
                  Tel: (315) 218-8000
                  E-mail: sdonato@bsk.com

Debtor's
Claims &
Noticing
Agent:            STRETTO
                  https://case.stretto.com/dioceseofbuffalo/docket

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petition was signed by Charles Mendolera, executive director of
financial administration.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                      https://is.gd/aGuiZd

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. M&T Bank                                             $1,600,000
One M&T Plaza
Buffalo, NY 14203
Hodgson Russ LLP
Attn: Garry M. Graber, Esq.
140 Pearl Street, Suite 100
Buffalo, NY 14202
Tel: (716) 848-1273

2. AB 55 Doe                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Jeff Anderson & Associates, P.A.
Attn: Jeffrey R. Anderson, Esq.
52 Duane Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Tel: (888) 920-9258

Law Offices of Steve Boyd & John Elmore
Attn: Stephen Boyd, Esq.
40 North Forest Road
Buffalo, NY 14221
Tel: (716) 400-0000

3. AB 131 Doe                         CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Jeff Anderson & Associates, P.A.
Attn: Jeffrey R. Anderson, Esq.
52 Duane Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Tel: (888) 920-9258

Law Offices of Steve Boyd & John Elmore
Attn: Stephen Boyd, Esq.
40 North Forest Road
Buffalo, NY 14221
Tel: (716) 400-0000

4. AB 97 Doe                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Jeff Anderson & Associates, P.A.
Attn: Jeffrey R. Anderson, Esq.
52 Duane Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Tel: (888) 920-9258

Law Offices of Steve Boyd & John Elmore
Attn: Stephen Boyd, Esq.
40 North Forest Road
Buffalo, NY 14221
Tel: (716) 400-0000

5. AB 49 Doe                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Jeff Anderson & Associates, P.A.
Attn: Jeffrey R. Anderson, Esq.
52 Duane Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10007
Tel: (888) 920-9258

Law Offices of Steve Boyd & John Elmore
Attn: Stephen Boyd, Esq.
40 North Forest Road
Buffalo, NY 14221
Tel: (716) 400-0000

6. Redacted                           CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Law Offices of Mitchell Garabedian, Esq.
Attn: Mitchell Garabedian, Esq.
100 State Street, 6th Floor
Boston, MA 02109
Tel: (617) 523-6250

7. Redacted                           CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Law Offices of Mitchell Garabedian, Esq.
Attn: Mitchell Garabedian, Esq.
100 State Street, 6th Floor
Boston, MA 02109
Tel: (617) 523-6250

8. Redacted                           CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala PLLC
Attn: Michael T. Pfau, Esq.
403 Columbia Street, Suite 500
Seatle, WA 98104
Tel: (206) 462-4334

9. Redacted                           CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Pfau Cochran Vertetis Amala PLLC
Attn: Michael T. Pfau, Esq.
403 Columbia Street, Suite 500
Seatle, WA 98104
Tel: (206) 462-4334

10. Redacted                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
HoganWillig, PLLC
Attn: William A. Lorenz, Esq.
2410 North Forest Road, Suite 301
Amherst, NY 14068
Tel: (716) 636-7600

11. Redacted                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Meyers Buth Law Group PLLC
Attn: Patrick J. Maloney, Esq.
21 Princeton Place, Suite 105
Orchard Park, NY 14127
Tel: (716) 508-8598

12. Redacted                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Parker Waichman LLP
Attn: Brett A. Zekowski, Esq.
6 Harbor Park Drive
Port Washington, NY 11050
Tel: (516) 466-6500

13. LG 26 Doe                         CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria, LLP
Attn: Richard P. Weisbeck, Jr., Esq.
42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120
Buffalo, NY 14202
Tel: (716) 849-1333

Laura A. Ahearn, Esq., PLLC
Attn: Laura A. Ahearn, Esq.
3075 Veterans Memorial Highway, Suite 200
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
Tel: (844) 524-3276

14. LG 29 Doe                         CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria, LLP
Attn: Richard P. Weisbeck, Jr., Esq.
42 Delaware Avenue, Suite 120
Buffalo, NY 14202
Tel: (716) 849-1333

Laura A. Ahearn, Esq., PLLC
Attn: Laura A. Ahearn, Esq.
3075 Veterans Memorial Highway, Suite 200
Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
Tel: (844) 524-3276

15. PB-3 Doe                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Fanizzi & Barr, P.C.
Attn: Paul K. Barr, Esq.
2303 Pine Avenue
Niagara Falls, NY 14301
Tel: (716) 284-8888

Phillips & Paolicelli, LLP
Attn: Diane M. Paolicelli, Esq.
747 3rd Avenue, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel: (212) 388-5100

16. PB-4 Doe                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Fanizzi & Barr, P.C.
Attn: Paul K. Barr, Esq.
2303 Pine Avenue
Niagara Falls, NY 14301
Tel: (716) 284-8888

Phillips & Paolicelli, LLP
Attn: Diane M. Paolicelli, Esq.
747 3rd Avenue, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Tel: (212) 388-5100

17. PSAS-03 Doe                       CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Pusatier, Sherman,
Abbott & Sugarman, LLP
Attn: Stephen F. Pusatier, Esq.
2464 Elmwood Avenue
Buffalo, NY 14212
Tel: (716) 873-6765

18. CF-6 Doe                          CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Chiacchia and Fleming LLP
Attn: Daniel J. Chiacchia, Esq.
5113 South Park Avenue
Hamburg, NY 14075
Tel: (716) 608-5595

19. W.D.                              CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Herman Law Firm, P.A.
Attn: Stewart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
5200 Town Center, Suite 540
Boca Raton, FL 33431
Tel: (800) 686-9921

20. G.D.                              CVA Lawsuit         $100,000
Merson Law, PLLC
Attn: Jordan K. Merson, Esq.
150 Esat 58th Street, Floor 34
New York, NY 10155
Tel: (212) 603-9100


DIOCESE OF BUFFALO: Facing Abuse Claims From 400+ Individuals
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Diocese of Buffalo in New York sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection, acknowledging that it anticipates sexual abuse claims
to be filed by at least 400 individuals.

In January 28, 2019, the New York State Legislature passed the
Child Victims Act (A.2683/5.2440).  New York's Governor signed the
legislation on Feb. 14, 2019.  This legislation modified the
statute of limitations and created a one-year "window" during which
victims of child sex abuse whose claim may have been time-barred
may commence a timely civil action.  In addition, the CVA extends
the statute of limitations for claims that were not time-barred on
its date of passage, permitting such child victims to commence
timely civil actions until they reach 55 years of age.

Charles Mendolera, executive director of financial administration
for the Diocese, said in court filings that from the opening of the
CVA window on Aug. 14, 2019 through the Petition Date,
approximately 250 lawsuits have been filed against the Diocese by
plaintiffs who are seeking damages as a result of alleged abuse.
In addition, demand letters and or notices have been received from
other claimants who have not yet commenced lawsuits against the
Diocese.

The Diocese anticipates that in excess of 400 individuals may
assert abuse claims for which they may seek to hold the Diocese
responsible.

The Diocese may have insurance coverage for some of the CVA claims
it will face.

The Debtor is filing a motion to seek portions of its schedules and
creditor matrices under seal to keep the identities of abuse
claimants confidential.  In light of the sensitive nature of the
claims of the CVA Plaintiffs and other Abuse Claimants, to avoid
causing unnecessary additional anguish or embarrassment, and to
encourage such individuals to feel safe and secure in advancing
their claims without fear of retribution or reprisal, the Diocese
submits that it would be inappropriate and potentially harmful to
require the public disclosure of identifying information relating
to individuals who have, either informally, formally, or through
filing a lawsuit, notified the Diocese of allegations of abuse by
clergy members or other persons employed by Catholic entities or
otherwise subject to Diocesan supervision.

                   8 Counties in New York

The Diocese serves an 8-county region in Western New York.  There
are currently 161 parishes and 594,315 Catholic individuals in the
territory of the Diocese.  These individuals are served by 144
active Diocesan priests, 84 Religious priests that reside in the
Diocese, 25 extern priests and 129 permanent deacons.  The Diocese
employs more than 240 people, which includes both clergy and
laity.

The Diocese is a not-for-profit Religious Corporation under New
York State law.  For the past several years, the Diocese's expenses
have exceeded its revenue.  Gross revenue for the fiscal year
ending on Aug. 31, 2019 was $13.1 million while expenses before
taking into account certain non-recurring activity were $18.1
million.  Gross revenue for the fiscal year ending on Aug. 31, 2018
was $18.1 million and expenses before taking into account certain
non-recurring activity were $19.9 million.

The Diocese has expended nearly $20 million over the past two
fiscal years in connection with voluntary settlement payments to
abuse victims as part of its Independent Reconciliation and
Compensation Program.  

The primary source of revenue used by the Diocese to support its
operations comes from parish assessments. The Diocese assesses
parishes an annual amount based primarily on historical parish
offeratory.  Assessments are due on a monthly basis.  Assessments
are collected for general Diocesan purposes and also for the
purposes of supporting elementary education and priest retirement
obligations.  Additional sources of operating funds include (i)
revenue from the annual Fund for the Faith appeal which is run in
conjunction with Catholic Charities, (ii) contributions and
bequests from the faithful, and (iii) realized investment gains.

                   Chapter 11 Filing

Reverend Peter J. Karalus, the Vicar General and Moderator of the
Curia, said in bankruptcy court filings that the Diocese does not
seek Chapter 11 relief to shirk or avoid responsibility for any
past misconduct by clergy or for any decisions made by Diocesan
authorities when addressing that misconduct.  The Diocese does not
seek bankruptcy relief to hide the truth or deny any person a day
in court.  

In fact, the Diocese is committed to pursuing the truth and has
never prohibited any person from telling his/her story or speaking
his/her truth in public.  The Diocese has publicly disclosed
perpetrators.  The Diocese has made and requires criminal referrals
to be made for all credible allegations of sexual abuse.  

The Diocesan Apostolic Administrator, The Most Reverend Edward B.
Scharfenberger has acknowledged past shortcomings by the Diocese
and haveattempted to offer aid and comfort to victims of abuse. The
Diocese has established standards for the training and background
assessment of all employees, clerics and volunteers who will likely
interact with children and young people."

The Diocese has commenced this Chapter 11 Case in order to (a)
provide an orderly claims administration process that will ensure a
more equitable distribution of funds to creditors, including
victims of abuse; and (b) bring about a reorganization of the
Diocese that will ensure that the mission of the Diocese may
continue to be fulfilled in service of the Catholic faith.

             About The Diocese of Buffalo

The Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y., is home to nearly 600,000 Catholics
over eight counties in Western New York.  The territory of the
Diocese is co-extensive with the counties of Erie, Niagara,
Genesee, Orleans, Chautauqua, Wyoming, Cattaraugus and Allegany in
New York State, comprising 161 parishes.  There are 144 diocesan
priests and 84 religious priests who reside in the Diocese.

The Diocese through its central administrative offices (a) provides
operational support to the Catholic parishes, schools and certain
other Catholic entities that operate within the territory of the
Diocese "OCE"; (b) conducts school operations through which it
provides parish schools with financial and educational support; (c)
provides comprehensive risk management services to the OCEs; (d)
administers a lay pension trust and a priest pension trust for the
benefit of certain employees and priests of the OCEs; and (e)
provides administrative support for St. Joseph Investment Fund,
Inc.

Dealing with sexual abuse claims, the Diocese of Buffalo, New York,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 20-10322) on
Feb. 28, 2020.

The Diocese was estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Carl L. Bucki is the case judge.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, led by Stephen A. Donato, Esq., is
the Debtor's counsel.  Stretto is the claims agent, maintaining the
page https://case.stretto.com/dioceseofbuffalo/docket


DONALD B. BURNHAM: Tosi Trust Buying North Port Property for $154K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Donald Raymond Burnham and Alice Ann Burnham ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to authorize
the sale of the real property located at 3481 Nekoosa St., North
Port, Sarasota County, Florida to Matthew and Lyn Tosi Revocable
Trust for $153,842, pursuant to their "As Is" Residential Contract
for Sale and Purchase.

On Jan. 20, 2020, the Salvation Trust through its trustee, Deborah
Bakaletz, executed a quit-claim deed transferring ownership of the
Real Property, more particularly described as follows Lot 20, Block
2629, Fifty-Second Addition to Port Charlotte Subdivision,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 21, Page 13, of
the Public Records of Sarasota County, Florida, Sarasota County Tax
Collector Account No. 0993262920, to the Wife-Debtor, Alice
Burnham.

On Jan. 27, 2020, the Wife-Debtor executed the Sale Contract
through which she intends to sell the Real Property to the
Purchasers for the sum of $153,842.  The sale of the property is
presently set to occur on Feb. 15, 2020.  However, the Purchasers
have agreed to extend the closing to Feb. 28, 2020, if necessary.


Upon information and belief, the only parties who may claim a lien
against the Real Property are the Sarasota County Tax Collector and
the Internal Revenue Service.  The claim of the Tax Collector will
be paid in full at closing.  According to the claim (Claim #2-2)
filed by the IRS, the IRS recorded a tax lien in the amount of
$1,732,896 against the Trust with the Sarasota Clerk of the Circuit
Court.  However, Old Republic National Title Insurance Company did
not find the lien when it performed a title search.

Through the instant motion, the Debtors are asking authority from
the Court to sell the Real Property "as is" and "where is," free
and clear of any potential liens, with valid and enforceable liens
attaching to the proceeds of the sale.

The lien of the IRS, to the extent it exists, will attach to the
proceeds.  Taxes and ordinary closing costs, including broker's
fees, will be paid at closing.  The net proceeds, after payment of
closing costs, will be held in trust by the Debtors' counsel until
the Court determines whether the IRS holds a lien against the
funds.

The proposed sale is on fair and equitable terms and is in the best
interest of the bankruptcy estate and its creditors.

The Debtors ask that the 14-day stay required under Bankruptcy Rule
Section 6004(h) be waived, and that any order granting the Motion
is effective immediately upon entry.

Donald Raymond Burnham and Alice Ann Burnham sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 15-11110) on Nov. 2, 2015.



DPW HOLDINGS: Agrees to Settle Derivative Action Pending in Calif.
------------------------------------------------------------------
DPW Holdings, Inc., entered into a definitive settlement agreement
between Plaintiffs Ethan Young and Greg Young, derivatively on
behalf of Nominal Defendant DPW against the Company's then
directors and DPW itself, Case No. 2:18-cv-06578, filed in the
United States District Court in the Central District of California
on July 31, 2018.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company's Board of
Directors will implement certain changes to the Company's bylaws,
committee charters, corporate governance policies, and the
composition of the Board, including the resignation of a current
director and the appointment of two new independent directors.  In
addition, the parties have agreed upon a payment of attorneys' fees
in the amount of $600,000 payable by the Company's Director &
Officer liability insurance.

The settlement agreement contains no admission of wrongdoing.  The
Company has always maintained and continues to believe that it did
not engage in any wrongdoing or otherwise commit any violation of
federal or state securities laws or other laws.

There can be no assurance that the settlement will be finalized and
approved by the Court and, even if approved, whether the conditions
to closing will be satisfied, and the actual outcome of this matter
may differ materially from the terms of the settlement.

The Company recommends that stockholders, investors and any other
interested parties read the Company's public filings and press
releases available on its website at www.DPWHoldings.com under the
Investor Relations section or available at www.sec.gov.

                        About DPW Holdings

Headquartered in Newport Beach, California, DPW Holdings, Inc.,
formerly known as Digital Power Corp. --
http://www.DPWHoldings.com/-- is a diversified holding company
pursuing growth by acquiring undervalued businesses and disruptive
technologies that hold global potential.  Through its wholly owned
subsidiaries and strategic investments, the Company provides
mission-critical products that support a diverse range of
industries, including defense/aerospace, industrial,
telecommunications, medical, crypto-mining, and textiles.  In
addition, the company owns a select portfolio of commercial
hospitality properties and extends credit to select entrepreneurial
businesses through a licensed lending subsidiary.

DPW Holdings incurred a net loss of $32.98 million in 2018,
following a net loss of $10.89 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30,
2019, the Company had $47.42 million in total assets, $29.50
million in total iabilities, and $17.92 million in total
stockholders' equity.  

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2016, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated April 16, 2019,
on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has a significant
working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses, and
needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain
its operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DUFF & PHELPS: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B-' on Leveraged Buyout
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
business consulting firm Duff & Phelps Holdings Corp. to 'B-' from
'B' and removed all of its ratings on the company from CreditWatch
where it placed them with negative implications on Feb. 6, 2020.

The downgrade follows the company's announcement of financing plans
for its proposed $4.2 billion buyout by a group of investors led by
its financial sponsors Stone Point Capital, Further Global, and
Permira. The transaction financing includes a $1.55 billion
dual-currency senior secured term loan, an undrawn $200 million
revolving credit facility, and $450 million of senior unsecured
notes.

Meanwhile, S&P assigned its 'B-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to the company's proposed senior secured credit
facility and its 'CCC' issue-level rating and '6' recovery rating
to its proposed senior unsecured notes.

The downgrade reflects Duff & Phelps' substantial debt burden under
the proposed capital structure for its leveraged buyout (LBO) and
the acquisition of Lucid.  Despite its expectation for positive
organic revenue growth and expanding EBITDA margins, S&P believes
the company's increased debt and interest expense will cause its
leverage to remain above 6.5x while it sustains a free operating
cash flow (FOCF)-to-debt ratio in the 5% area over the next two
years, which is inconsistent with the rating agency's expectations
for a 'B' issuer credit rating.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Duff & Phelps
will continue to expand its organic revenue by the low- to
mid-single-digit percent area while benefitting from operational
initiatives, the roll-off of one-time costs, and successful
acquisition integrations that improve its EBITDA margins over the
next 12 months despite its substantial debt burden. Pro forma for
the acquisition, S&P expects the company's leverage to decline to
the high-6x area in 2021, from the low-7x area in 2020, and
anticipates that the company's FOCF-to-debt ratio will remain in
the 5% area over the next two years.

"We could lower our rating on Duff & Phelps if we believe its
capital structure is unsustainable, which could occur if it faces
operational challenges such as acquisition-integration missteps,
client volume declines due to increased competition, or
reputational challenges that cause its revenue or EBITDA to fall
and lead its FOCF-to-debt ratio to become negligible. We could also
lower our rating if the company pursues substantial debt-financed
acquisitions or shareholder rewarding activitiess such that we
believe it will be unable to comfortably service its fixed charges
with its organic cash flow generation," S&P said.

"We view the probability of an upgrade for Duff & Phelps as low
over the next 12 months primarily because of its sponsors'
aggressive growth strategy and our expectation that its debt
leverage will remain above 6.5x. To upgrade the company, we would
require it to implement a more conservative financial policy,
decrease its adjusted debt leverage below 6.5x, and increase its
FOCF-to-debt ratio well above 5% on a sustained basis through a
combination of EBITDA growth and debt repayment," the rating agency
said.


DUNCAN MORGAN: Trustee Objects to MacGregor's Plan Disclosures
--------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin L. Sink, Chapter 11 Trustee, objects to the Disclosure
Statement filed by Bannor Michael MacGregor.

The Trustee points out that based on the records of the Debtor that
the Trustee has reviewed to date, as well as the MacGregor Claims,
the Disclosure Statement is false, misleading and inaccurate.

The Trustee asserts that the Disclosure Statement does not contain
adequate information sufficient for the creditors to make an
informed decision on the Plan.

According to the Trustee, the Disclosure Statement fails to satisfy
the requirements of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1125.

As reported in the Troubled Company Reporter, Bannor Michael
MacGregor filed a Plan of Reorganization for Duncan Morgan LLC.
The Plan contemplates a reorganization of the Debtor's obligations.
In accordance with the Plan, the Debtor intends to satisfy creditor
claims from: (i) converting certain claims to equity; (ii) selling
excess property; (iii) leveraging real property; (iv) rental income
from certain excess property; and/or (v) loans to the Debtor or
cash calls from owners.  Under the Plan, all debts will be paid in
full.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 10, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/sn34nuv from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                     About Duncan Morgan

Duncan Morgan LLC is primarily engaged in renting and leasing real
estate properties.

Duncan Morgan sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case
No. 19-03113) on Oct. 10, 2019.  The Debtor was estimated to have
$1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.  

The Hon. David M. Warren is the case judge.  

J.M. Cook, Esq., is the Debtor's counsel.  

Kevin L. Sink was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee on Aug. 21,
2019.
The Chapter 11 Trustee can be reached at:

        Kevin L. Sink
        NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA.
        P.O. Box 18237
        Raleigh, NC 27619
        Telephone: 919-781-1311
        Facsimile: 919-782-0465
        E-mail: ksink@nichollscrampton.com

On Dec. 31, 2019, the Court appointed Jeff Horton of Allen Tate
Realty as the realtor for the Trustee.


DURR MECHANICAL: Plan Solicitation Period Extended to May 11
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
extended to May 11 the period for Durr Mechanical Construction,
Inc. to solicit acceptances for its Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

The extension will give the company additional time to make
revisions to and finalize its proposed plan, and get court approval
of its disclosure statement.

Durr Mechanical previously filed a motion to approve its disclosure
statement but it was denied by the court as the document required
certain revisions.  The company is currently revising the
disclosure statement and is negotiating with secured and priority
creditors concerning the plan.

                       About Durr Mechanical

Durr Mechanical Construction, Inc. -- http://www.durrmech.com/--
is a mechanical contracting company headquartered in New York.  It
offers commercial HVAC, scheduling and cost control, BIM drafting,
erecting and setting equipment, process piping, power piping, and
emergency services.

Durr Mechanical Construction filed a voluntary petition for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-13968) on Dec. 7, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Kenneth A. Durr, president, the Debtor was
estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities.  LaMonica Herbst &
Maniscalco, LLP, led by Michael Thomas Rozea, and Adam P. Wofse, is
the Debtor's legal counsel.  

The Debtor filed its Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement on Sept. 13, 2019.


EARTH FARE: Russell R. Johnson III Represents Utility Companies
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of Earth Fare, Inc., et al., the law firm
of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC submitted a verified statement under
Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, to disclose
that it is representing the following utility companies that
provided prepetition utility goods/services to the Debtors.

The names and addresses of the Utilities represented by the Firm
are:

     a. Florida Power & Light Company
        Attn: Joseph Ianno, Esq.
        Law Department
        700 Universe Blvd.
        Juno Beach, FL 33408

     b. Georgia Power Company
        Attn: Daundra Fletcher
        2500 Patrick Henry Parkway
        McDonough, GA 30253

     c. American Electric Power
        Attn: Dwight C. Snowden
        1 Riverside Plaza, 13th Floor
        Columbus, OH 43215

     d. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
        Ohio Edison Company
        Attn: Kathy M. Hofacre
        FirstEnergy Corp.
        76 S. Main St., A-GO-15
        Akron, OH 44308

     e. Virginia Electric and Power Company
        d/b/a Dominion Energy Virginia
        Attn: Sherry Ward
        600 East Canal Street, 10th floor
        Richmond, VA 23219

     f. The East Ohio Gas Company
        d/b/a Dominion East Ohio
        Attn: Marrissa J. Hinton
        2100 Eastwood Avenue
        Akron, OH 44305

     g. Orlando Utilities Commission
        Attn: Zoila P. Easterling, Esq.
        Deputy General Counsel
        P.O. Box 3193
        Orlando, FL 32802

The nature and the amount of claims (interests) of the Utilities,
and the times of acquisition thereof are as follows:

     a. The following Utilities have unsecured claims against the
above-referenced Debtors arising from prepetition utility usage:
American Electric Power, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
Company, Ohio Edison Company, Georgia Power Company, Orlando
Utilities Commission, The Dominion East Ohio Gas Company, d/b/a
Dominion East Ohio and Virginia Electric and Power Company d/b/a
Dominion Energy Virginia.

     b. Florida Power & Light Company held prepetition deposits
that secured all prepetition debt.

     c. For more information regarding the claims and interests of
the Utilities in these jointly-administered cases, refer to the
Objection of Certain Utility Companies To the Debtors' Motion For
Entry of Interim and Final Orders (I) Prohibiting Utility Companies
From Altering, Refusing, or Discontinuing Utility Services, (II)
Deeming Utility Companies Adequately Assured of Future Payment,
(III) Establishing Procedures For Determining Additional Assurance
of Payment, and (IV) Setting a Final Hearing Related Thereto
(Docket No. 157) filed in the above-captioned,
jointly-administered, bankruptcy cases.

The Law Firm of Russell R. Johnson III, PLC was retained to
represent the foregoing Utilities in February 2020.  The
circumstances and terms and conditions of employment of the Firm by
the Companies is protected by the attorney-client privilege and
attorney work product doctrine.

The Firm can be reached at:

          LAW FIRM OF RUSSELL R. JOHNSON III, PLC
          Russell R. Johnson III
          2258 Wheatlands Drive
          Manakin-Sabot, VA 23103
          Telephone: (804) 749-8861
          Facsimile: (804) 749-8862
          E-mail: russell@russelljohnsonlawfirm.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/SrqOnH

                 About Earth Fare Inc. and EF
                   Investment Holdings Inc.

Founded in 1975 in Asheville, N.C., Earth Fare, Inc. --
http://www.earthfare.com/-- is a natural and organic food retailer
with locations across 10 states.  It offers groceries and wellness
and beauty products.

Earth Fare and its affiliate, EF Investment Holdings, Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 20-10256) on Feb. 4, 2020.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtors each disclosed assets of between $100 million
and $500 million and liabilities of the same range.

Judge Karen B. Owens oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as legal
counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial and restructuring
advisor; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC, as claims,
solicitation and balloting agent.  Malfitano Advisors, LLC,
provides disposition advisory services to the Debtors.


ECOARK HOLDINGS: Michael Green Quits as Director
------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Green has resigned as a member of the Board of Directors
of the Ecoark Holdings, Inc. to pursue other opportunities.  Mr.
Green's resignation was not in connection with any disagreement
with the Company on any matter relating to its operations, policies
or practices, according to a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

                     About Ecoark Holdings

Rogers, Arkansas-based Ecoark Holdings, Inc., founded in 2011,
Ecoark is an AgTech company modernizing the post-harvest fresh food
supply chain for a wide range of organizations including growers,
suppliers, distributors and retailers.  The Company's wholly-owned
subsidiary, Zest Labs, offers the Zest FreshTM solution, a
breakthrough approach to quality management of fresh food, is
specifically designed to help substantially reduce the amount of
food loss the U.S. experiences each year.  Through item-level
monitoring and real-time predictive analytics, Zest Fresh enables
customers to improve the freshness and quality of produce and
proteins, realize substantial cost savings and reduce food waste.

RBSM LLP, in Larkspur, CA, the Company's auditor since 2019, issued
a "going concern" qualification in its report dated Aug. 19, 2019,
citing that the Company has sustained significant operating losses
and needs to obtain additional financing to continue its
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Ecoark reported a net loss of $13.65 million for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2019, following a net loss of $32.84 million for
the year ended March 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, EcoArk had
$4.48 million in total assets, $7.74 million in total liabilities,
and a total stockholders' deficit of $3.26 million.


EDGEWELL PERSONAL: S&P Ups ICR to BB on Termination of Merger Deal
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
Edgewell Personal Care Co. (Edgewell) to 'BB' from 'BB-' and its
issue-level rating on the company's senior unsecured notes to 'BB'
from 'B+'.

The upgrade follows the company's termination of its merger
agreement with Harry's Inc. after the U.S. Federal Trade
Commission's filing of a lawsuit seeking to block the proposed
transaction.

S&P also revised the recovery rating on the notes to '3' from '5'.
The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for meaningful
recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%) in the event of a payment
default.

The termination of the merger removes the immediate risk for
substantial balance sheet leveraging and any Harry's-specific
execution risk.  The proposed Harry's acquisition would have at
least temporarily resulted in significant credit ratio
deterioration –- including pro forma adjusted leverage increasing
to the low-6x area –- and presented execution risk, including
combining two potentially dissimilar cultures. Moreover, it was
possible Edgewell may not have been able to leverage the two
organizations' combined competitive advantages—including
Edgewell's technology and Harry's disruptive marketing savvy—into
meaningful EBITDA growth, especially considering Harry's history of
operating losses. Edgewell's decision to terminate the transaction
and announce 3x-3.5x leverage target reduces near term credit
risk.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation over the next year
for modestly higher pro forma adjusted EBITDA excluding the infant
and pet care disposal, adjusted leverage increasing to the mid-3x
area (compared with about 3x for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2019)
due to higher shareholder returns, and FOCF strengthening to about
$180 million annually. It also assumes that Edgewell will refinance
by early summer 2020 its $600 million notes maturing in May of
2021.

"We could lower the rating if we project adjusted debt to EBITDA
will increase and remain above 4x, which could result from
substantially more aggressive financial policies than we expect
including materially higher share repurchases, multiple bolt-on
acquisitions, or an unexpected transformational acquisition.
Adjusted leverage could also exceed 4x due to escalating
competition from larger rivals and online shave clubs, a
re-emergence of wet shave category declines, volatile input costs,
including steel, or unexpected supply chain disruptions related to
adverse coronavirus developments, which we presently believe is a
low risk to Edgewell. We estimate that a 20% drop in EBITDA, or a
sustained $225 million increase in funded debt compared with our
base case forecast could result in adjusted leverage sustained
above 4x," S&P said.

"Although unlikely over the next year, we could raise our rating on
Edgewell if it strengthens its business position and demonstrates
sustained adjusted EBITDA growth following the prior two years of
overall profit deterioration, which--coupled with a moderating
level of shareholder payments--allows it to sustain adjusted debt
to EBITDA of less than 3x. This could occur due to successful
project fuel initiatives, lower input costs (namely for steel), and
a continuation of more rational industry conditions," the rating
agency said.


EKSO BIONICS: Incurs $12.1 Million Net Loss in 2019
---------------------------------------------------
Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of
$12.13 million on $13.92 million of revenue for the year ended Dec.
31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $26.99 million on $11.33
million of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.  The increase
in revenue for the 2019 period is primarily due to a higher volume
of EksoGT and EksoNR sales.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $21.92 million in total
assets, $15.12 million in total liabilities, and $6.80 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Gross profit for the full year ended Dec. 31, 2019 increased by 57%
to approximately $6.8 million, representing a gross margin of
approximately 49%.  This compares to gross profit of $4.3 million
for the same period in 2018, representing a gross margin of 38%.
The increase was primarily due to higher average selling prices and
lower production costs of EksoGT and EksoNR devices.

Sales and marketing expenses were $11.4 million for the full year
ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to $13.8 million for the same period
in 2018, a decrease of $2.4 million.  The decrease was primarily
due to the absence of one-time severance and related costs, the
absence of amortization expense related to intangible assets, lower
general marketing and trade show expenses and a decrease in
clinical trial activities.

Research and development expenses were $4.6 million for the full
year ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to $5.8 million in the same
period in 2018, a decrease of $1.2 million primarily due to lower
employment costs.

General and administrative expenses were $7.4 million for the full
year ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to $11.7 million in the same
period in 2018, a decrease of $4.3 million.  The decrease was
primarily due to an absence of a one-time severance and related
costs associated with certain former executive officers in the
comparable period of 2018, lower external consulting costs and
lower legal expenses.

Gain on warrant liabilities for the full year ended Dec. 31, 2019
was $6.4 million due to the revaluation of warrants issued in 2015
and 2019, compared to $1.1 million associated with the revaluation
of warrants issued in 2015 for the same period in 2018.

Cash on hand at Dec. 31, 2019 was $10.9 million, compared to $7.7
million at Dec. 31, 2018.

OUM & CO. LLP, in San Francisco, California, the Company's auditor
since 2010, issued a "going concern" qualification dated Feb. 27,
2020, citing that Company has incurred significant recurring losses
and negative cash flows from operations since inception and an
accumulated deficit.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

                Fourth Quarter 2019 Financial Results

Revenue was $3.7 million for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2019,
compared to $3.3 million for the same period in 2018.  Revenue in
the fourth quarter of 2019 included approximately $3.3 million in
EksoHealth revenue, an increase of 28% compared to $2.6 million in
the same period in 2018, and approximately $0.4 million in
EksoWorks sales, compared to $0.7 million in the same period in
2018.  The Company booked a total of 26 EksoNR units in the fourth
quarter of 2019, including 4 rental units.

Gross profit for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2019 increased by about
24% to $1.9 million, compared to $1.5 million in the same period in
2018, representing a record gross margin of approximately 50% in
the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to a gross margin for the same
period in 2018 of 45%.  The overall increase in gross margin is
primarily due to higher average selling prices and lower production
costs of the Company's EksoNR devices.

Sales and marketing expenses for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2019
were $2.7 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, or approximately 7%,
compared to the same period in 2018.  The decrease was primarily
due to lower general marketing and trade show expenses, a decrease
in clinical trial activities and the absence of amortization
expense related to intangible assets.

Research and development expenses for the quarter ended Dec. 31,
2019 were $0.6 million, compared to $1.4 million for the same
period in 2018, a decrease of $0.8 million, or approximately 59%.
The decrease was primarily due to lower patent and licensing
costs.

General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended Dec. 31,
2019 were $1.4 million, compared to $2.3 million for the same
period in 2018, a decrease of $0.9 million, or approximately 40%.
The decrease was primarily due to lower external consulting and
legal expenses and lower compensation costs from reduced
headcount.

Gain on warrant liabilities for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2019 was
$0.3 million due to the revaluation of warrants issued in 2015 and
2019, compared to a $1.2 million gain associated with the
revaluation of warrants issued in 2015 for the same period in
2018.

Net loss applicable to common stockholders for the quarter ended
Dec. 31, 2019 was $2.7 million, or $0.04 per basic and diluted
share, compared to net loss of $4.1 million, or $0.07 per basic and
diluted share, for the same period in 2018.

"By generating record revenues in the fourth quarter of 2019, we
are pleased with the traction of our commercial strategy and the
value that we believe our customers see in adopting our solutions,"
said Jack Peurach, president and chief executive officer of Ekso
Bionics.  "Our actions to expand customer awareness of the clinical
and economic benefits of our innovative products are having a
positive impact as we are building sales momentum in the U.S.
inpatient rehabilitation and direct European markets.  Our focus on
partnering with integrated delivery networks and network operators,
a key component of our growth strategy, is resulting in greater
opportunities for multi-unit sales and facilitating a shorter sales
cycle.  With regards to our operations, we maintained fiscal
discipline as evidenced by reducing our use of cash to its lowest
levels in our history. Looking ahead, we believe that we are
well-positioned to deliver continued top-line growth through
increased sales to our existing customers and expanding our
customer pipeline in both the medical and industrial segments."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/TlyABL

                       About Ekso Bionics

Headquartered in Richmond, California, Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc.
-- http://www.eksobionics.com/-- designs, develops, and sells
exoskeleton technology that has applications in healthcare and
industrial markets.  The Company's wearable exoskeletons are worn
over clothing and are mechanically controlled by a trained operator
to augment human strength, endurance, and mobility.


ELEFTHERIA LLC: Kirama Offers Trustee $760K for Memphis Property
----------------------------------------------------------------
Michael E. Collins, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Eleftheria, LLC, asks
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Tennessee to
authorize the sale of the real property located 405 North Cleveland
Street, Memphis, Tennessee to Kirama Investment Group, LLC for
$760,000.

Even prior to the appointment of the Trustee, the Debtor had
attempted to sell the Real Property.  Indeed, on Sept. 11, 2019,
the Debtor filed the Sale Motion, which sought approval of the sale
of Real Property to Kirama pursuant their Commercial Purchase and
Sale Agreement.  The Debtor's Sale Motion was withdrawn on Nov. 19,
2019.

The Trustee has managed to resuscitate the sale to Kirama pursuant
to the same Sale Contract, following an extension and pursuant to
the settlement agreement discussed herein.  However, Kirama has
indicated that the sale of the Real Property must close by Feb. 29,
2020.  The Trustee believes that there is significant risk that the
Sale Contract will fall through if the sale of the Real Property
does not close prior to the end of February.  Accordingly, the
Trustee respectfully asks that the Court schedules a hearing on the
Motion at its earliest available setting.   

The Debtor owns the Real Property.  The Real Property is subject to
a first priority deed of trust granted by the Debtor in favor of
Pacific Western Bank, the assignee of CL45 MW Loan 1, LLC, which,
in turn was the assignee of Kirkland Financial LLC, the original
holder of such deed of trust.  The Pacific Deed of Trust also
encumbers certain real property owned by the Debtor that is located
at
2884 Walnut Grove Road, Memphis, Tennessee.  The current amount
owing on the promissory note secured by the Pacific Deed of Trust
is not less than $834,448.  The Real Property is also subject to
statutory tax liens in favor of Shelby County, Tennessee.  

Crosstown Arts  is the lessee of the Real Property under a lease
agreement dated Oct. 24, 2017.  The Lease Agreement has a term of
10 years.  Crosstown paid $350,000 for certain tenant improvements
to the Real Property.  In consideration for the TI Work, the Debtor
agreed to certain rent abatements over the course of the term of
the Lease Agreement.  Crosstown has subleased the real property to
Spectacularoptical, LLC, doing business as Black Lodge Video.  The
Sublease's term is substantially the same as the term specified in
the Lease Agreement.

The Trustee asks that the Court to approve the sale of the Real
Property free and clear of Interests, with any Interests attaching
to the proceeds of the sale of the Real Property.  The sale of the
Real Property should be approved as an exercise of the Trustee's
business judgment.

Both prior to and subsequent to the Petition Date, the Real
Property was marketed by GrandPoint Realty, LLC.  The offer
reflected in the Sale Contract is the highest and best offer
received by either the Debtor (pre or post-petition) or the
Trustee.  Additionally, GrandPoint, who has been retained in this
case as realtor for the Trustee pursuant to approval by the Court
has agreed to accept only a 3% seller commission, while the buyer
is unrepresented.   

The Trustee asks the Court to approve the settlement among Pacific,
Crosstown, and the Trustee.  As a condition precedent to the Sale
Contract, Kirama has required that the Lease Agreement be
terminated/rejected and that the Sublease be assigned to Kirama.
The Trustee has negotiated with Crosstown for a mutual agreed
termination of the Lease Agreement, with full releases, in exchange
for a payment from the proceeds of the Sale Contract in the amount
of $229,000.  As part of the Crosstown Settlement, Crosstown agrees
to assign the Sublease to Kirama, or its designee, as required to
consummate the sale.

In conjunction with the Crosstown Settlement, Pacific has agreed to
accept $500,000 in full satisfaction and release of the Pacific
Deed of Trust, without waiving any claims for further sums up to
the remaining value of its claim against the Debtor and without
releasing any liens with respect to any other properties encumbered
by the Pacific Deed of Trust.

Pursuant to the Sale Contract and the Settlement, the proceeds from
sale of the Real Property will be distributed as follows:

          Payee       Amount                 Description

       GrandPoint     $22,800           3% Sale Commission
        Pacific      $500,000   Payment on Account of Pacific Deed
of Trust
       Crosstown     $229,000           Crosstown Settlement
     Shelby County     $7,806   2018 and 2019 Real Property Taxes
(estimated)
        Debtor           $394                 Remainder
         Total:      $760,000

To implement the foregoing successfully, the Trustee asks waivers
of the 14-day stay of an order granting a motion for relief from
the automatic stay under Bankruptcy Rule 4001(a)(3), the notice
requirements under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(a), and the 14-day stay of
an
order authorizing the use, sale, or lease of property under
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the Agreement is available at https://tinyurl.com/w6smo9l
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                     About Eleftheria LLC

Eleftheria, LLC, is the fee simple owner of two real estate
properties in Memphis, Tenn., having a total current value of
$1.153 million.

Eleftheria filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No.
19-26603) on Aug. 20, 2019. In the petition signed by James Skefos,
chief manager, the Debtor disclosed $1,153,000 in assets and
$2,292,812 in liabilities. Judge Jennie D. Latta oversees the case.
Eugene G. Douglass, Esq., at Douglass & Runger, is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

Michael E. Collins, Esq., was appointed as the Debtor's Chapter 11
trustee. The trustee is represented by Manier & Herod, P.C.


ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS: Closes $600K Sale Agreement with Nostrum
---------------------------------------------------------------
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc., executed an agreement with Nostrum
Laboratories Inc. pursuant to which the Company will sell to
Nostrum all of its rights in and to the Company's approved
abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) for its generic Dolophine
(methadone hydrochloride tablets, 5 mg and 10 mg) and generic
Bontril PDM (phendimetrazine tartrate tablet, 35 mg) for $600,000
in cash.  The sale has been consummated.

                  About Elite Pharmaceuticals

Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -- http://www.elitepharma.com/-- is a
specialty pharmaceutical company which is developing a pipeline of
niche generic products.  Elite specializes in oral sustained and
controlled release drug products which have high barriers to entry.
Elite owns generic products which have been licensed to TAGI
Pharma, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc., USA., and Lannett Company,
Inc.  Elite currently has eleven approved generic products, three
generic products filed with the FDA, one approved generic products
pending manufacturing site transfer, and an NDA filed for
SequestOx.

Elite reported a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$9.28 million for the year ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net
loss attributable to common shareholders of $3.67 million for the
year ended March 31, 2018.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had
$24.08 million in total assets, $15 million in total liabilities,
and $9.08 million in total shareholders' equity.

Buchbinder Tunick & Company LLP, in Little Falls, New Jersey, the
Company's auditor since 2010, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated June 21, 2019, citing that the
Company has incurred recurring losses from operations, negative
cash flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit that
raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


EMPRESA LOCAL: Disclosure Statement Hearing Reset to May 13
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 13, 2020, Judge Brian K. Tester of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Puerto Rico granted the motion of debtor
Empresa Local Global Inc. requesting continuance of the hearing on
approval of the disclosure statement.

The hearing on approval of the Disclosure Statement scheduled for
April 29, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. will now be held on May 13, 2020, at
9:30 a.m., at the United States Bankruptcy Court, Jose V. Toledo
Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse, 300 Recinto Sur, Courtroom
No. 1, Second Floor, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Objections to the form and content of the Disclosure Statement
should be in writing and filed with the court and served upon
parties in interest at their address of record not less than 14
days prior to the hearing. Objections not timely filed and served
will be deemed waived.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/qtfrh7l from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                  About Empresa Local Global

Empresa Local Global, Inc., formerly known as Casas Mi Estillo, was
created in 1987 and was in the business of selling wooden
prefabricated houses in Puerto Rico.  

Empresa Local Global filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 14-06675) on August 14, 2014.  The case is
assigned to Judge Brian K. Tester.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor was estimated to have assets and liabilities of less than $1
million.  The Debtor is represented by Charles A.
Cuprill-Hernandez, Esq., in San Juan, Puerto Rico.


EPIC COMPANIES: To Seek Plan Confirmation on April 1
----------------------------------------------------
Judge David R. Jones has ordered that the Court conditionally
approves the Disclosure Statement filed by Epic Companies, LLC, et
al., as having adequate information as required by Section 1125 of
the Bankruptcy Code without prejudice to any party in interest
objecting to the Disclosure Statement at the Combined Hearing.

The Court has set a hearing for April 1, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.
(Prevailing Central Time) to consider final approval of the
Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan.

The Court has approved this schedule:

  * Voting Record Date: Feb. 14, 2020
  * Commencement of Plan Solicitation and Mailing of Combined
Notice: Feb. 24, 2020
  * Plan Supplement Filing Deadline: March 17, 2020
  * Plan Voting Deadline and Deadline to Object to Disclosure
Statement and Confirmation: March 24, 2020 at 5 p.m. (Prevailing
Central Time)
  * Deadline to File Voting Affidavit: March 26, 2020
  * Deadline to file Consolidated Brief and Reply in Support of
Confirmation: March 30, 2020
  * Combined Hearing on Final Approval of Disclosure Statement and
Confirmation of Plan: April 1, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. (Prevailing
Central Time

                     About Epic Companies

Headquartered in Houston, Epic Companies, LLC, is a full-service
provider to the global decommissioning, installation and
maintenance markets.  Its services include heavy lift, diving and
marine, specialty cutting and well plugging and abandonment
services. It has limited ongoing operations and is owned 50 percent
by Orinoco and 50 percent by Oakridge Natural Resources, LLC, and
Oakridge Energy Partners LLC.

Epic Companies and six affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-34752) on Aug. 26, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, Epic Companies had estimated assets of between
$10 million and $50 million and liabilities of between $100 million
and $500 million.

The Debtors tapped Porter Hedges LLP as bankruptcy counsel; S3
Advisors, LLC as restructuring advisor; Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as claims agent; and Lugenbuhl Wheaton Peck
Rankin & Hubbard as special counsel.

Henry Hobbs Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 7, appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors on Sept. 6, 2019.  The committee
is represented by Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C.


EQM MIDSTREAM: Moody's Lowers CFR to Ba2, Outlook Remains Negative
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded EQM Midstream Partners, LP's
Corporate Family Rating to Ba2 from Ba1, its Probability of Default
Rating to Ba2-PD from Ba1-PD and its unsecured notes rating to Ba2
from Ba1. The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating remains SGL-3. The
rating outlook remains negative.

Concurrently, Moody's downgraded Equitrans Midstream Corporation's
CFR to B1 from Ba3, PDR to B1-PD from Ba3-PD and its term loan
rating to B1 from Ba3. ETRN's SGL-3 rating remains unchanged.
ETRN's rating outlook is negative. All of ETRN's ratings will be
withdrawn upon the proposed termination of its term loan, as there
will be no rated debt at ETRN.

This action follows EQM's February 27, 2020 announced actions that
included a renegotiated gathering contract with its upstream
partner EQT Corporation (Ba1 negative) in combination with the
buyback of EQT's shares in ETRN, ETRN's acquisition of EQM's
publicly held units and a new dividend policy.

"EQM's announcements including the ETRN/EQM rollup and the
termination of the ETRN term loan simplify the company's capital
structure, and the revised dividend policy will substantially
improve EQM's free cash flow outlook. Yet, these actions result in
a significant increase in EQM's financial leverage, the easing of
which is fully reliant on the completion of and the cash flow from
the Mountain Valley Pipeline project," commented Sreedhar Kona,
Moody's senior analyst. "Compounding the risk to EQM's credit
profile is EQT's weakening credit profile in light of the anemic
natural gas price environment and EQM's reliance on EQT as its
anchor shipper. EQM's negative outlook reflects that risk."

Debt List:

Downgrades:

Issuer: EQM Midstream Partners, LP

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Ba2-PD from Ba1-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Ba2 from Ba1

  Senior Unsecured Notes, Downgraded to Ba2 (LGD4) from
  Ba1 (LGD4)

Downgraded and To be Withdrawn upon the termination of ETRN term
loan:

Issuer: Equitrans Midstream Corporation

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B1-PD from Ba3-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B1 from Ba3

  Senior Secured Term Loan, Downgraded to B1 (LGD4) from Ba3
  (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: EQM Midstream Partners, LP

  Outlook, remains Negative

Issuer: Equitrans Midstream Corporation

  Outlook, remains Negative, to be withdrawn upon the termination
  of ETRN term loan

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade of EQM's CFR to Ba2 was precipitated by a combination
of factors including EQM's elevated debt leverage from the proposed
transactions and the execution risk in improving its debt leverage,
and EQT's weakening credit profile. EQM's reliance on MVP's cash
flow to ease its worsening financial leverage, and execution
uncertainty around MVP due to regulatory road blocks pose a
substantial risk to EQM's credit profile. EQM's revised dividend
policy will help the company retain a meaningful amount of cash;
however, without MVP's cash flow the company's financial leverage
will remain elevated. Additionally, with about 70% of EQM's
revenues derived from EQT, EQM's credit profile is closely tied to
that of EQT and its weakening cash flow outlook in light of low
natural gas prices. The downgrade of ETRN's CFR to B1 follows EQM's
downgrade.

EQM's Ba2 CFR is supported by its close proximity to high
production volumes in the Marcellus Shale and the critical nature
of its pipelines for moving natural gas within the region to long
haul pipelines. Contract renegotiations with EQT have provided EQM
with a new 15-year gas gathering agreement with immediately
effective longer-term, higher minimum volume commitments that will
enhance EQM's long-term cash flow profile. EQM is restrained by its
basin concentration and the multiple delays in completing the MVP
project, which is owned by the joint venture in which EQM is the
largest equity owner and serves as the operator of the pipeline.
EQM's credit profile is also constrained by EQT's credit weakness.

ETRN's B1 CFR, two notches below EQM, reflects the company's status
as a pure-play holding company without any hard assets and debt
that is structurally subordinated to the debt at EQM. ETRN's $600
million term loan's ($594 million outstanding as of December 31,
2019) serviceability is solely reliant on distributions from EQM, a
distribution stream which is junior to EQM's substantial financing
and operating requirements and its debt.

EQM has a $3 billion revolving credit facility due 2023, $1.4
billion of term loan due 2022 and $3.5 billion of senior unsecured
notes with staggered maturities, as of December 31, 2019. EQM's
revolver, term loan and senior notes are unsecured and are pari
passu. Accordingly, the senior notes are rated Ba1, the same as the
CFR.

EQM should have adequate liquidity, as reflected in its SGL-3
rating. As of December 31, 2019, the company had approximately $600
million in borrowings under its $3 billion unsecured revolving
credit facility due October 2023. EQM's capital spending through
2020 will include capital contributions dedicated to its MVP
project and other growth projects. Moody's expects EQM to fund its
liquidity needs through its operating cash flow and revolver draws.
There is one financial covenant governing the credit facility -- a
maximum consolidated Debt/EBITDA ratio of 5.0x, stepping up to 5.5x
during an acquisition period. Additional borrowings through 2020
will strain EQM's ability to remain in compliance with its
covenant, but the company should maintain compliance with its
covenant requirements. However, the company risks breaching its
covenant if MVP is not online in 2021. There are no debt maturities
until August 2022 when the term loan matures.

EQM's negative outlook reflects the continued uncertainty in the
completion of MVP and the weakness in EQT's credit profile. ETRN's
negative outlook follows EQM's negative outlook.

EQM's ratings could be downgraded if its debt to EBITDA sustains
above 6x or if EQT's credit quality deteriorates significantly.
ETRN's ratings could be downgraded if EQM's ratings are
downgraded.

An upgrade of EQM is unlikely given EQT's negative outlook. EQM's
ratings could be considered for an upgrade if EQM reduces its debt
to EBITDA to below 5x and there is significant improvement in EQT's
credit quality. ETRN's ratings could be upgraded if EQM's ratings
are upgraded.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Midstream
Energy published in December 2018.

EQM Midstream Partners, LP is a master limited partnership that
owns and operates interstate pipelines and gathering lines
primarily serving Marcellus Shale production.


ERNEST VICKNAIR: Disbursing Agent Selling Houma Property for $20K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Patrick J. Gros, the Disbursing Agent of Ernest A. Vicknair, Jr.,
asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Louisiana to authorize the sale of the real property located at
5555 Bayou Black Drive, Houma, Louisiana to Brett Vicknair, or his
designee(s) for $20,000.

The Debtor's Plan provides, in relevant part, that the Disbursing
Agent is to market and sell the non-exempt assets of the Debtor's
estate, including 5555 Bayou Black Drive, and is authorized to
retain appropriate professionals to carry out his duties under the
Plan.

Exhibit 2 to the Plan alleges that the estimated net proceeds from
the sales of 5555 Bayou Black Drive would be approximately $42,500.
The Disbursing Agent has received and accepted, subject to the
Court's approval, the offer from the Purchaser for 5555 Bayou Black
Drive in the amount of $20,000.  

The Purchase Agreement includes the following additional terms and
conditions: (i) the proposed sale is subject to the approval by the
Court; and (ii) the proposed sale is an all cash sale and is not
contingent upon financing or the sale of any other property.

The Disbursing Agent asks the entry of an order (a) authorizing the
sale of 5555 Bayou Black Drive under Section 363(b); (b) free and
clear of liens, claims, and interests, with liens, claims, and
interests attaching to the proceeds; and (c) granting such other
related and appropriate relief.

In the matter, the Disbursing Agent did not make a decision to sell
5555 Bayou Black Drive since the sale of that property is required
by the terms of the Plan.  Therefore, the Disbursing Agent submits
that the requirement of a showing of a sound business justification
was either met previously or is inapplicable under the present
circumstances.

The Disbursing Agent proposes and requests authority to hold in
trust the net proceeds of the sale of 5555 Bayou Black Drive for
distribution pursuant to the other applicable provisions of the
Plan.

The net proceeds of the Sale will be calculated by taking the gross
amount of each Sale indicated and deducting all usual and customary
closing costs, the realtor's commission due and payable, and the
pro rata share of the Sale's portion of the Quarterly Fee due to
the Office of the United States Trustee based upon the total gross
amount of the Sale.  

A copy of the Agreement is available at https://tinyurl.com/uo7rhen
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                        About the Debtor

Ernest A. Vicknair, Jr., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
La. Case No. 17-11059) on April 27, 2017.  The Debtor tapped Eric
J. Derbes, Esq., at The Derbes Law Firm, LLC, as counsel.

On April 9, 2018, the Court confirmed the Debtor's Plan of
Reorganization as of Dec. 4, 2017 with Immaterial Modifications as
of Feb. 28, 2018, recognizing and appointing Patrick J. Gros as the
Disbursing Agent.

On June 21, 2018, the Court appointed Tiffany Mohre and Kathy
Neugent as realtors.


EVERGREEN PALLET: March 26 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert D. Berger has ordered that the hearing to consider the
approval of the disclosure statement filed by Evergreen Pallet LLC
will be held at Robert J Dole US Courthouse, 500 State Avenue Room
151, Kansas City, KS 66101 on March 26, 2020, at 1:30 p.m.

Objections to the Disclosure Statement will be filed and served if
any, on or before March 18, 2020.

                  About Evergreen Pallet

Evergreen Pallet LLC is a pallet supplier in Wichita, Kansas.   

Evergreen Pallet filed a petition seeking relief under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 19-21983) on
Sept. 17, 2019.  In the petition signed by Jeffrey Ralls, member,
the Debtor listed assets at $1,316,600 and liabilities at
$6,624,679.  The Hon. Robert D. Berger is the case judge.  KRIGEL &
KRIGEL, PC, is the Debtor's counsel.


FAIRWAY GROUP: Sets Store Closing Procedures
--------------------------------------------
Fairway Group Holdings Corp., and debtor affiliates, filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York a
notice of their proposed store closing procedures in connection
with the sale of store closing assets.

The Debtors are engaged in a sale strategy with the goal of
consummating as many going concern sales as possible.  In
connection with the Sale Strategy, they've reviewed each of their
stores and analyzed their profitability, and will continue to do so
during these chapter 11 cases.  

In analyzing their stores, the Debtors considered, and continue to
consider, among other factors, current occupancy costs, historical
and projected store profitability, recent and projected sales
trends, the geographic market in which each store is located, the
potential to realize negotiated rent reductions with the landlords
of the applicable store, specific factors related to a store’s
performance, and whether any firm offer for such store was obtained
or is likely available from third-parties.

If a buyer is not found for a particular store, the Debtors must be
able to quickly and efficiently wind down and liquidate such
stores.  By the Motion, the Debtors ask approval of the Store
Closing Procedures to be applied to such stores immediately upon
designating a Closing Store in order to preserve liquidity and
maximize the value of the Debtors' estates.  

The Debtors ask approval of (i) the Store Closing Procedures to
sell, transfer, or abandon the furniture, fixtures, and equipment
("F&E"), inventory and other assets, including surplus, obsolete,
non-core, or burdensome assets ("De Minimis Assets") ("Store
Closing Assets") at any Closing Store, in each case free and clear
of liens, claims, or encumbrances, with any such liens attaching to
the proceeds of the Store Closing Sales; and (ii) related relief.  
The Debtors will provide notice of their intent to apply the Store
Closing Procedures to stores identified as Closing Stores in
accordance with the proposed procedures set forth in the Motion.

In addition, the Debtors will, either directly or through the
retention of a liquidation consultant, subject to any restrictions
set forth in the Debtors DIP financing facility, including the
interim and final orders with respect thereto, conduct the sales of
the inventory and Store Closing Assets for any Closing Stores.  

The Debtors propose implementing the Store Closing Procedures to
facilitate seamless Store Closing Sales and closure of the Closing
Stores.  The Debtors have determined that, in the exercise of their
business judgment, implementing the Store Closing Procedures will
provide the most timely and efficient means of maximizing the value
of the Store Closing Assets in the event that they are not sold.  

The Debtors will market the leases, and, therefore, they've not yet
made a determination whether to reject the leases for the Closing
Stores.  Therefore, the Debtors are asking authority, but not
direction, to cease operations at any particular Closing Store.
Nothing in the Motion or the Proposed Order should be construed as
requiring the Debtors to identify any Closing Stores or conduct
Store Closing Sales at any particular Closing Store.  

The Debtors will notify landlords, unions, and employees, among
other parties affected by the closure of the Closing Stores.   A
complete list of the Debtors' stores that the Debtors may, in the
exercise of their business judgment, be required to wind down and
liquidate ("Potential Closing Stores") is reflected in Exhibit 2.

The Debtors believe that in most cases, the Store Closing
Procedures are consistent with Liquidation Sale Laws and with the
leases affected by the Store Closing Sales.  Certain requirements,
however, may hamper their efforts to maximize the value of their
Store Closing Assets, as approximately 30% of which consist of
perishable inventory.  Thus, they ask authority to conduct the
Store Closing Sales in accordance with the Store Closing Procedures
without complying with the Liquidation Sale Laws, when the two are
inconsistent.

Similarly, the Debtors request a finding that any contractual
restrictions that could otherwise inhibit or prevent their ability
to maximize recovery through the Store Closing Sales are
unenforceable.  In certain cases, the Store Closing Sales may be
inconsistent with certain provisions of leases, subleases, vendor
contracts, or other documents associated with the Closing Stores,
including reciprocal easement agreements, agreements containing
covenants, conditions, and restrictions, including "go dark"
provisions and landlord recapture rights, or other similar
documents or provisions.

Further, they ask that the Court orders that no person or entity,
including utilities, landlords, contract counterparties, suppliers,
creditors, and all persons acting for or on their behalf, will
interfere with or otherwise impede the conduct of the Store Closing
Sales, or institute any action against the Debtors or landlords at
the Closing Stores in any court (other than in the Court) or before
any administrative body in any way that directly or indirectly
interferes with, obstructs, or otherwise frustrates the conduct of
the Store Closing Sales.

The Debtors also ask that they be presumed to be in compliance with
any applicable "fast pay" laws to the extent such payroll payments
are made by the later of (i) the Debtors' next regularly scheduled
payroll and (ii) seven calendar days following the termination date
of the relevant employee, and in all such cases consistent with,
and subject to, any previous orders of the Court regarding payment
of same.

The relief requested represents a sound exercise of the Debtors'
business judgment.  The Store Closing Procedures represent the most
efficient and appropriate means of maximizing the value of the
Store Closing Assets, while balancing the potentially competing
concerns of affected proprietors and other parties in interest.
Any interruption or delay in the Debtors' ability to efficiently
close the Closing Stores during these chapter 11 cases could have
serious negative consequences for the Debtors' estates.

Any Store Closing Assets that are not sold during the Store Closing
Sales will be transferred to surrounding locations or abandoned.  

A copy of the Store Closing Procedures is available at from
PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Feb. 20, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. (ET).
The objection deadline is Feb. 13, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

                      About Fairway Group

Fairway Group -- https://www.fairwaymarket.com/ -- is a food
retailer operating 14 supermarkets across the New York, New Jersey
and Connecticut tri-state area, including two with freestanding
wine and liquor stores (the Stamford and Pelham locations) and two
with in-store wine and liquor stores (the Woodland Park and Paramus
locations).  The company's flagship store is located at Broadway
and West 74th Street, on the Upper West Side of Manhattan,
featuring a cafe, Sur la Route, and state of the art cooking
school.  Fairway's stores emphasize an extensive selection of
fresh, natural, and organic products, prepared foods, and
hard-to-find specialty and gourmet offerings, along with a full
assortment of conventional groceries.

Fairway Group Holdings Corp. and 25 affiliated companies sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 20-10161) on
Jan. 23, 2020.  

In the petitions signed by CEO Abel Porter, the Debtors were
estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in assets and
liabilities.  

Judge James L. Garrity, Jr., is assigned to the cases.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal counsel;
Peter J. Solomon and Mackinac Partners, LLC as financial advisor;
and Omni Agent Solutions as claims, noticing and solicitation
agent.


FEMUR BUYER: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR & Alters Outlook to Negative
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Femur Buyer, Inc.'s B3 Corporate
Family Rating, B3-PD Probability of Default Rating and the B2
rating of its senior secured first lien credit facilities. At the
same time, Moody's changed the outlook to negative from stable.

The affirmation reflects the company's solid business fundamentals
and Moody's expectations that revenue will grow. Further, the
affirmation reflects the company's adequate liquidity, supported
largely by a sizeable revolving credit facility.

The change of outlook to negative reflects the erosion in earnings
over the past year due to operating issues at its Santa Ana and
Oregon production facilities and increased labor and compliance
costs. While Moody's believes that the company has largely
addressed these issues, the pace of earnings improvement will
depend on how quickly new business ramps up and productivity
improvement initiatives take hold. Further, the negative outlook
reflects the FDA warning letter received by the company's Detroit
facility in the first quarter of 2019. Resolution of the warning
letter and companywide compliance enhancement will require
incremental costs. Further, any escalation of FDA findings could
delay the ramp up of new business from customers. Lastly, the
negative outlook reflects Moody's view that free cash flow will
remain negative for at least another 2-3 quarters. This reflects
significant investments the company is making in automation and
growth capex. Moody's believes that these investments are good for
the longer-term health of the business. However, failure to
significantly improve earnings over the next 12-18 months will lead
to continued negative free cash flow and a weakening of liquidity,
particularly in light of the fact that the company loses the
ability to partially PIK the interest on its second lien term loan
in 2021.

Ratings Affirmed:

Issuer: Femur Buyer, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating at B3

Probability of Default Rating at B3-PD

$100 million Senior Secured 1st lien Revolving Credit
Facility expiring 2024 at B2 (LGD3)

$485 million (original face amount excluding PIK) Senior
Secured 1st lien Term Loan due 2026 at B2 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Femur Buyer, Inc.

Outlook changed to negative from stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 CFR reflects Femur's very high financial leverage, moderate
scale, sole focus on the orthopedic market and customer
concentration. Moody's estimates that Femur will end 2019 with
adjusted debt/EBITDA exceeding 9.0x. Including pro forma benefits
from select productivity improvement initiatives and capex capacity
increases that Moody's believes are achievable over the next year,
adjusted debt/EBITDA would be closer to 8.0x. As a result of the
high leverage, Moody's expects minimal free cash flow and modest
interest coverage. That said, Femur's medical products contract
manufacturing business is characterized by high barriers to entry
and switching costs. This is because of the significant amount of
time and investment required for its customers to obtain product
regulatory approvals, of which Femur is an integrated part.
Consequently, the company tends to have long-term relationships
with its customers, lending stability to revenue and cash flow.

Medical device companies face moderate social risk primarily
related to responsible production and satisfactorily responding to
social and demographic trends. For Femur Buyer, the social risks
are primarily associated with responsible production include
compliance with regulatory requirements for the safety of medical
devices as well as adverse reputational risks arising from recalls
associated with manufacturing defects.

Ratings could be downgraded if the company's liquidity and/or
operating performance deteriorates. The ratings could also be
downgraded if the company pursues an aggressive debt-funded
acquisition strategy or if free cash flow remains negative on a
sustained basis.

Ratings could be upgraded if Femur materially increases its size
and scale, diversifies its product portfolio and demonstrates
stable organic growth. Adjusted debt/EBITDA sustained below 6.0
times and sustained positive free cash flow could support an
upgrade.

Femur Buyer Inc. is the parent company of several companies doing
business under the "Orchid Orthopedics" brand name. Femur is a
provider of medical device outsourcing services. The company
specializes in casting, coating, forging and finishing of implants
and instruments used primarily in joint reconstruction, spine,
trauma, and sports medicine procedures. The company's pro forma
revenues are approximately $342 million.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Medical Product
and Device Industry published in June 2017.


FERRO CORP: S&P Affirms 'BB-' Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings on Ferro Corp., including
the 'BB-' issuer credit rating and the 'BB-' issue-level and the
'3' recovery ratings remains unchanged on Ferro's first-lien term
loan facility. The '3' recovery rating reflects S&P's expectations
of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) recovery prospects
in the event of a payment default.

The affirmation of the 'BB-' issuer credit rating on Ferro Corp.
reflects S&P's belief that the company's leverage will remain
within its expectations, such that weighted-average funds from
operations (FFO) to debt will remain between 12% and 20%, despite
weakened operating performance last year.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Ferro's FFO to
debt will remain above 12% and the company will continue to focus
on innovation. The rating agency's base case assumes Ferro
continues to maintain status quo operations, including its tile
coatings business. S&P will review the company's business and
capital structure near the close of the divestiture.

"We could lower the rating within the next 12 months if a weaker
operating environment leads to a 200 basis point (bps) decline in
both EBITDA margins and revenue from our base case. If this
occurred, we could consider a lower rating if FFO to debt dropped
below 12%. In addition, we could lower the rating if, against our
expectations, the company undertook more aggressive financial
policies, such as a large debt-funded acquisition or shareholder
rewards, resulting in weaker credit measures," S&P said.

"We could raise the rating within the next 12 months if FFO to debt
rose above 20% on a sustained pro forma basis. In such a scenario,
we would expect both EBITDA margins and revenue growth to improve
300 bps from our expectations. This would likely occur if there is
a greater-than-expected shift to new products, with higher EBITDA
margins. Before considering an upgrade, we would need to gain
clarity that the company's financial policies and growth
initiatives would support maintaining these credit measures and
profitability," the rating agency said.


FIRST QUANTUM: S&P Affirms 'B-' ICR, Alters Outlook to Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on First Quantum Minerals'
(FQM's) long-term issuer credit rating to negative from stable, and
at the same time affirming the 'B-' rating.

The rating actions came after S&P lowered its sovereign credit
rating on Zambia, source of about two-thirds of FQM's cash flows in
2019, to 'CCC/Negative/C' from 'CCC+/Stable/C', indicating a higher
probability of a default later this year.

Zambia's liquidity challenges may pose some short-term risks for
Canada-headquartered copper miner FQM.   The negative rating action
on Zambia highlights the risk of a potential default in the coming
six to 12 months. This could translate into potential restrictions
to foreign exchange access for corporates, and other business
disruptions, such as new regulations or availability of
infrastructure.

In 2018, about 70% of FQM's EBITDA and cash flows came from Zambia.
As a result, S&P considered one notch above Zambia's transfer and
convertibility (T&C) assessment (then 'CCC+', now 'CCC') to be a
cap on FQM's rating. With the ramp-up of its flagship greenfield
copper mine, Cobre Panama, the exposure to Zambia has decreased to
below 70% in 2019 and is projected to decrease to about 50% of
EBITDA by the end of the year. Consequently, S&P now considers a
gap of up to two notches between FQM's rating and Zambia's T&C as
appropriate, before having an effect on the rating.

S&P's assessment of FQM's stand-alone credit profile (SACP) is
unchanged at 'b'.  Full-year EBITDA for 2019 came in at the lower
end of S&P's September forecast, at $1.6 billion compared with its
previous projection of $1.6 billion-$1.8 billion. This reflected
lower average market copper prices (partly offset by the company's
hedging program), production at the lower end of guidance, and a
slight increase in the group's costs.

In 2019, the company started to see the first contribution from the
ramp-up of Cobre Panama--it contributed 133,000 tonnes of copper
sales, and $203 million EBITDA from commercial production from
Sept. 1, 2019 to Dec. 31, 2019.

"Looking into 2020, we expect the company's S&P Global
Ratings-adjusted EBITDA to step up to $2.2 billion-$2.5 billion,
mainly thanks to Cobre Panama," the rating agency said.

S&P's projection takes into account some recovery from the current
low copper prices (average price of $6,000/t in 2020). Its base
case assumes a deleveraging to adjusted debt to EBITDA of 4.0x-4.5x
by end-2020, compared with about 6.6x at end-2019, and a positive
free operating cash flow (FOCF) generation of $0.6 billion-$0.7
billion. This is equivalent on a net debt basis (taking into
account the company's cash balance) to 3.5x-4.0x at end-2020 versus
5.9x at end-2019.

"We continue to regard favorably the company's objective to reduce
its gross debt.  We understand that the company continues to aim
for reported net debt to EBITDA of not more than 2.0x over the long
term (versus about 5.0x at end-2019) before embarking on new
projects. As of Dec. 31, 2019, the company's reported net debt was
$7.7 billion. Under the assumption of an annual EBITDA of about
$2.5 billion, FQM would be able to meet its objective as early as
2022," S&P said.

"Current ownership has no effect on the rating.  We understand that
the China-based copper producer Jiangxi Copper has recently
increased its stake in FQM, reaching 18.02%, becoming the largest
shareholder (the rest of the shares are free float). We also
understand that there is an agreement between FQM and Jiangxi that
restricts the latter from increasing its stake in FQM to over 20%.
In our view, it is still too early to assess Jiangxi's long-term
strategy, which could include a collaboration between the two
companies," the rating agency said.

The negative outlook reflects over the short term the potential
default of Zambia, and the potential operational disruptions as
Zambia's liquidity position remains constrained.

Under its base-case scenario, S&P projects adjusted EBITDA of $2.2
billion-$2.5 billion in 2020, translating into an adjusted debt to
EBITDA in the range of 4.0x-4.5x, with FOCF of $0.6 billion-$0.7
billion. It continues to view adjusted debt to EBITDA of 4.0x-5.0x
as commensurate with the current 'b' SACP.

S&P does not factor in any negative impact from the pending issues
around the enactment of the law that issued the Cobre Panama
license.

"Over the short term, we could take a negative rating action on FQM
if there is a further deterioration in the sovereign credit quality
of Zambia, leading to an increased risk of foreign-exchange
controls affecting FQM's ability to repatriate cash," S&P said.

"That said, with a higher earnings contribution coming from Cobre
Panama at least about a third of EBITDA by the end of 2020, FQM's
exposure to Zambia will decrease somewhat, and the linkage between
our ratings on the sovereign and FQM will further weaken," the
rating agency said.

On a stand-alone basis, pressure on the 'b' SACP could increase if
liquidity deteriorates or if the company's adjusted debt to EBITDA
was above 5.0x without a clear path to improvement. This could
occur if S&P observes one or more of the following:

-- A production shortfall in Zambia. For example, a production
drop of more than a third in 2020 (all else being equal);

-- A material drop in copper prices in the second half of the year
or in 2021 (the company's price exposure is partly mitigated by
hedges in place);

-- Slower ramp-up of Cobre Panama or much higher production costs;
or

-- The launch of a new sizable greenfield project or a material
acquisition.

"We could stabilize the outlook on FQM's 'B-' rating later this
year, if we believed that Zambia's weak liquidity position was
contained and FQM continued to de-risk its exposure to the country
in line with its plans, and with increasing free cash flows coming
from Cobre Panama," S&P said.

"The likelihood of an upgrade of our rating on FQM to 'B' in the
next six to 12 months has now become more remote. Such a rating
action would require a stabilization of the Zambia situation. In
addition, we would also expect the pending legal issues around the
enactment of the law that issued Cobre Panama's license to continue
to have no negative effect on operations," the rating agency said.


FLOYD SQUIRES: Liquidating Agent Selling Samoa Property for $77.5K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Janina M. Hoskins, the Liquidating Agent of the estate of the Floyd
E. Squires III and Betty J. Squires, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of California to authorize the sale of
the real property located at 2409 Lindstrom Avenue, Samoa,
California to Jonathan Koechlin or his designee for $77,500,
subject to higher and better bids.

A hearing on the Motion is set for March 4, 2020 at 10:30 a.m.

The Property generates no revenue.  An earlier sale of the Property
approved by order of the Court fell through.

The Liquidating Agent moves to sell the Property to the Buyer.  The
Property will be sold free and clear of liens.  Subject to Court
approval and higher and better bids, the Liquidating Agent has
accepted an offer of $77,500 from the Buyer for the Property, with
an initial deposit of $2,713 and the balance to be paid at the
close of escrow, with escrow to close within 30 days after entry of
an order approving the sale.

Any and all terms of the Sale Agreement, including, but not limited
to the payment of any commissions, are subject to the approval of
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
California and overbid.  The Buyer is purchasing the Property on an
"as is, where is" basis, with no warranties or representation.  Any
dispute over the terms of the Sale Agreement will be resolved by
the Bankruptcy Court.

The sale is subject to overbids on the same terms and conditions as
the Sale Agreement, with the overbid deadline being set three days
prior to the Court hearing on the Motion.  If a qualified overbid
is received, an auction will be held before the Court, unless
directed otherwise by the Court.  Annexed to the Hoskins
Declaration as Exhibit B are the relevant pages of a title report
issued by Humboldt Land Title concerning the Property.

A title report for the Property notes that on Sept. 21, 2001, a
deed of trust in the amount of $50,000 was recorded as Document No.
2001-24327-15 in the Official Records of Humboldt County in favor
of Option One Mortgage Corporation, a California corporation,
concerning loan number 011048669.  An assignment of the beneficial
interest under said deed of trust naming Wells Fargo Bank
Minnesota, N.A., as Trustee for registered Holders of Option One
Mortgage Loan Trust 2001-D Asset-Backed Certificates, Series
2001-D, without recourse, was recorded Aug. 28, 2002 as Document
No. 2002-27552-2 in the Official Records of Humboldt County. The
Assignor is listed as Sand Canyon Corp.; the Assignee is listed as
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2017-6.  

New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust 2017-6 filed a request for
notice in the case on Nov. 17, 2017, requesting service on its
authorized agent: Theron S. Covey, Esq., Robertson, Anschutz &
Schneid, P.L., 6409 Congress Ave., Suite 100, Boca Raton, FL 33487,
(tcovey@rasflaw.com). Mr. Covey has provided an alternate mailing
address for his firm of 7676 Hazard Center Drive, Suite 500, San
Diego, CA 92108. Mr. Covey is a registered electronic filer and
receives Notices of Electronic Filing in the case.

The Property is subject to various interests in favor of the City
of Eureka, a municipal corporation, including four abstracts of
judgment for various sums.  The Liquidating Agent believes she can
sell free and clear of these liens or encumbrances, and that, the
City of Eureka will consent to the sale and execute those documents
as may be necessary to satisfy the title company prior to closing.
At the City of Eureka's request, it is possible the Liquidating
Agent will request paragraphs in an order authorizing the sale of
the Property that removes the City of Eureka's liens only as to the
Property and not to other properties encumbered by the liens in
favor of the City of Eureka.  The Liquidating Agent believes that
the Property can be sold free and clear of this lien, with valid
amounts being paid from escrow or shortly thereafter or if any
amounts are disputed.

The Liquidating Agent asks an order authorizing her to direct
payment from escrow of the following standard expenses:

     (i) A real estate broker's commission not to exceed 6% of the
total sales price, which will be split with the Buyer's broker, if
any; and

     (ii) Standard closing costs, including but not limited to
unpaid real property taxes, escrow fees, if any, recording costs
and the like.

The Liquidating Agent asks that the order approving the proposed
sale of the Property provide that the Order approving the sale is
effective upon entry, and the stay otherwise imposed by Rule 62(a)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Bankruptcy Rule
6004(h) will not apply.

                        About the Squires

Floyd E. Squires, III, and Betty J. Squires filed for chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-10828) on Nov. 8, 2017,
and are represented by David N. Chandler, Esq. of the Law Offices
of David N. Chandler.

Janina M. Hoskins was appointed as examiner of the Debtors on April
23, 2018.  DENTONS US LLP, led by Michael A. Isaacs, is the
examiner's counsel.


FORTVILLE APARTMENTS: Seeks Cash Access Thru May 2020
-----------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to a second motion filed Feb. 17, 2020, Fortville
Apartments LLC is asking the Bankruptcy Court to authorize use of
cash collateral to pay its operating expenses, pursuant to a budget
covering the period from February 2020 through May 2020.  

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor along with affiliated debtors,
owe iBorrow REIT LP approximately $10,190,000 in principal amount,
plus interest and fees.  Lender claims that the Debtors owe an
aggregate of $13,778,786.77 under the prepetition loan.   

According to the Debtor, the lender is adequately protected due to
a significant equity cushion of over $4 million.  Moreover, the
lender is holding $1,595,000 of the Debtor's assets in interest
reserve, capital expenditure reserve and tax lien reserve.  

A copy of the second cash collateral motion, with the budget, is
available free of charge at https://is.gd/ESPcrg from
PacerMonitor.com.

                   About Fortville Apartments

Fortville Apartments, LLC is a single asset real estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Fortville Apartments sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 20-41081) on Jan. 26,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  Judge Thomas J. Tucker oversees the case.  Zousmer Law
Group, PLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


FROG POND GRADING: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge J. Craig Whitley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of North Carolina issued an interim order authorizing Frog
Pond Grading & Paving, Inc. to use cash collateral only for
ordinary, actual, and necessary business expenses during the period
through the earliest of

      (i) the entry of a final order authorizing the use of cash
collateral, or

      (ii) the entry of a further interim order authorizing the use
of cash collateral, or

      (iii) entry of an Order by the Court terminating the Interim
Order for cause, including but not limited to breach of the terms
and conditions; or

      (iv) upon filing of a notice of default as provided in the
Interim Order.

Pinnacle Bank is granted a valid, attached, choate, enforceable,
perfected and continuing security interests in, and liens upon
post-petition assets of the Debtor of the same character and type
actually used, to the same extent and validity as the liens and
encumbrances of Pinnacle Bank is attached to the Debtor's assets
pre-petition. The Bank's security interests in, and liens upon, the
post-petition collateral will have the same validity and priority
as existed between the Debtor, and all other creditors or claimants
against the Debtor's estate on the Petition Date. The security
interests and liens granted to the Bank: (i) are and will be in
addition to all security interests, liens and rights of set-off
existing in favor of Pinnacle Bank on the Petition Date, if any;
and (ii) will secure the payment of the indebtedness owing to
Pinnacle in an amount equal to the aggregate cash collateral used
or consumed by the Debtor.

In addition, the Debtor will make monthly adequate protection
payments to Pinnacle Bank in the amount of $836.66.

                   About Frog Pond Grading

Frog Pond Grading & Paving, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 19-31725) on Dec. 20, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by Brian P. Hayes, Esq., at Ferguson, Hayes,
Hawkins & Demay, PLLC.



GENCANNA GLOBAL: Farmer & Wright Represents Suppliers
-----------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Farmer & Wright, PLLC provided notice that it is
representing JE Services LLC, and Justin Clark, Patrick Conyea, and
BDH LLC in the Chapter 11 cases of GenCanna Global USA, Inc., et
al.

Todd A. Farmer, of Farmer & Wright PLLC, has been retained as legal
counsel by JE Services LLC, and Justin Edwards as its legal
representative, 5165 Gilbertsville Highway, Calvert City KY
42029-0388, to represent its interests in all proceedings in this
bankruptcy matter. The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA, Inc., owes JE
Services LLC for farming and planting services pursuant to a Hemp
Production Agreement with the Debtor. Todd A. Farmer of Farmer &
Wright PLLC will represent JE Services LLC in these proceedings
under Farmer & Wright PLLC's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates.

Todd A. Farmer, of Farmer & Wright PLLC, has been retained by
Justin Clark, 5470 Old US Highway 45 S, Paducah, KY 42003, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter for farming and planting services pursuant to a Hemp
Production Agreement with the Debtor. Todd A. Farmer, of Farmer &
Wright PLLC will represent Just D. Clark in these proceedings under
Farmer & Wright's normal terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Todd A. Farmer, of Farmer & Wright PLLC, has been retained by
Patrick Conyea, 90 Abigale Way, Hickory, KY 42051, to represent its
interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy matter. Patrick
Conyea, for farming and planting services pursuant to a Hemp
Production Agreement with the Debtor. Todd A. Farmer, of Farmer &
Wright PLLC will represent Patrick Conyea in these proceedings
under Farmer & Wright's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates.

Todd A. Farmer, of Farmer & Wright PLLC, has been retained by BDH
LLC, and Brad Wiggins as its legal representative, 417 State Route
83, Mayfield KY 42066, to represent its interests in all
proceedings in this bankruptcy matter. The Debtor, GenCanna Global
USA, Inc., owes BDH LLC for farming and planting services pursuant
to a Hemp Production Agreement with the Debtor. Todd A. Farmer, of
Farmer & Wright PLLC will represent BDH LLC in these proceedings
under Farmer & Wright's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates

JE Services LLC, Justin Clark, Patrick Conyea, and BDH LLC, are not
publicly traded companies, and neither Todd Farmer or Farmer &
Wright, LLC own any business interest with any of them or any
interest in the Debtor or its affiliates in this Chapter 11
proceeding.

Counsel for JE Services LLC, Justin Clark, Patrick Conyea, and BDH
LLC can be reached at:

          Farmer & Wright, PLLC
          Todd A. Farmer, Esq.
          4975 Alben Barkley Drive, Suite 1
          P.O. Box 7766
          Paducah, KY 42002-7766
          Tel: 270-201-7771
          Fax: 270-443-4631

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/AxR1zK

                   About GenCanna Global USA

GenCanna Global USA, Inc. -- https://gencanna.com/ -- is a
vertically-integrated producer of hemp and hemp-derived CBD
products with a focus on delivering social, economic, and
environmental impact through seed-to-scale agricultural
production.

GenCanna Global USA was the subject of an involuntary Chapter 11
proceeding (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 20-50133-GRS) filed on Jan.
24, 2020.  The involuntary petition was signed by alleged creditors
Pinnacle, Inc., Crawford Sales, Inc., and Integrity/Architecture,
PLLC.  

On Feb., 6, 2020, GenCanna Global USA, Inc., consented to the
involuntary petition and on Feb. 5, 2020 two debtor affiliates,
GenCanna Global, Inc. and Hemp Kentucky, LLC filed their own
voluntary chapter 11 petitions under the Bankruptcy Code

Laura Day DelCotto, Esq., at DELCOTTO LAW GROUP PLLC, is
representing the petitioners.

The Debtors tapped Huron Consulting Services LLC is as operational
advisor, Jefferies LLC as financial advisor, and Benesch
Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP along with Dentons Bingham
Greenebaum LLP as the Company's legal counsel in connection with
the Chapter 11 case.  Epig is the claims agent, maintaining the
page https://dm.epiq11.com/GenCanna


GENCANNA GLOBAL: Morgan Pottinger Represents Trade Companies
------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Morgan Pottinger Mcgarvey provided notice that it
is representing Community Financial Services Bank, Inc. and New
Millennium Building Systems, LLC in the Chapter 11 cases of
GenCanna Global USA Inc.

Melinda T. Sunderland, of Morgan Pottinger McGarvey, has been
retained as legal counsel by Community Financial Services Bank,
Inc., as its legal representative, 221 West 5th Street, Benton,
Kentucky 42025, to represent its interests in all proceedings in
this bankruptcy matter. The debtor, GenCanna Global USA, Inc. owes
Community Financial Services Bank, Inc. an obligation secured by a
mortgage on real property located in Paducah, Kentucky. Melinda T.
Sunderland, of Morgan Pottinger McGarvey, will represent Community
Financial Services Bank, Inc. in these proceedings under Morgan
Pottinger McGarvey's normal terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Melinda T. Sunderland, of Morgan Pottinger McGarvey, has been
retained by New Millennium Building Systems, LLC, as its legal
representative, 6115 County Road 42, Butler, Indiana 46721, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter. The debtor, GenCanna Global USA, Inc. owes New Millennium
Building Systems, LLC, for labor and materials provided for the
hemp production facility located in Mayfield, Kentucky. Melinda T.
Sunderland, of Morgan Pottinger McGarvey, will represent Community
Financial Services Bank, Inc. in these proceedings under Morgan
Pottinger McGarvey's normal terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Community Financial Services Bank, Inc. and New Millennium Building
Systems, LLC are not publicly traded companies, and neither Melinda
T. Sunderland or Morgan Pottinger McGarvey own any business
interest with either of them or any interest in the debtor or its
affiliates in this Chapter 11 proceeding.

Counsel for Community Financial Services Bank, Inc. and New
Millennium Building Systems, LLC can be reached at:

          MORGAN POTTINGER MCGARVEY
          Melinda T. Sunderland, Esq.
          401 South 4th Street, Suite 1200
          Louisville, KY 40202
          Telephone: 502-560-6775
          Facsimile: 502-585-3498
          Email: msunderland@mpmfirm.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/Ot5eKS

                    About GenCanna Global USA

GenCanna Global USA, Inc. -- https://gencanna.com/ -- is a
vertically-integrated producer of hemp and hemp-derived CBD
products with a focus on delivering social, economic, and
environmental impact through seed-to-scale agricultural
production.

GenCanna Global USA was the subject of an involuntary Chapter 11
proceeding (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 20-50133-GRS) filed on Jan.
24, 2020.  The involuntary petition was signed by alleged
creditors
Pinnacle, Inc., Crawford Sales, Inc., and Integrity/Architecture,
PLLC.  

On Feb., 6, 2020, GenCanna Global USA, Inc., consented to the
involuntary petition and on Feb. 5, 2020 two debtor affiliates,
GenCanna Global, Inc. and Hemp Kentucky, LLC filed their own
voluntary chapter 11 petitions under the Bankruptcy Code

Laura Day DelCotto, Esq., at DELCOTTO LAW GROUP PLLC, is
representing the petitioners.

The Debtors tapped Huron Consulting Services LLC is as operational
advisor, Jefferies LLC as financial advisor, and Benesch
Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP along with Dentons Bingham
Greenebaum LLP as the Company's legal counsel in connection with
the Chapter 11 case.  Epig is the claims agent, maintaining the
page https://dm.epiq11.com/GenCanna


GENCANNA GLOBAL: Neely Brien Represents Jill Coffey, 11 Others
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs, PLLC provided notice
that it is representing Jill Coffey, David Joshua Cherry, Jared
Donaldson, Spookhouse Farms, LLC, Robert Ellison, Bobby Toon,
Conyea Farms, LLC, Jerry Holloway, Brad Mathis, Gary Riley, Brent
Shultz and Ray Keith Mathis in the Chapter 11 cases of GenCanna
Global USA, Inc.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has been retained as legal counsel by Jill Coffey, as its
legal representative, 3105 State Route 125, Hickman, KY 42050, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA, Inc., owes Jill Coffey
for planting, cultivation, and farming services performed under an
Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.
Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, will represent Jill Coffey in these proceedings under Neely
Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by David Joshua Cherry, as
its legal representative, 14605 ST RT 303, Fulton, KY 42041, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes David Joshua
Cherry for planting, cultivation, and farming services performed
under an Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered with the
Debtor.  Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien
Wilson & Toombs, will represent David Joshua Cherry in these
proceedings under Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of
engagement and hourly rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Jared Donaldson, as its
legal representative, 1343 Nance Road, Hickory, KY 42051, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Jared Donaldson
for planting, cultivation, and farming services performed under an
Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.
Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, will represent Jared Donaldson in these proceedings under
Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Spookhouse Farms, LLC, as
its legal representative, 2114 CR 1015, Bardwell, KY 42035, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Spookhouse
Farms, LLC, for planting, cultivation, and farming services
performed under an Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered
with the Debtor.  Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of
Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs, will represent Spookhouse Farms, LLC
in these proceedings under Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal
terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Robert Ellison, as its
legal representative, 2048 ST RT 97, Mayfield, KY 42066, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Robert Ellison
for planting, cultivation, and farming services performed under an
Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.
Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, will represent Robert Ellison in these proceedings under
Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Bobby Toon, as its legal
representative, 9620 ST RT 408, Fancy Farm, KY 42039, to represent
its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy matter.  The
Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Bobby Toon for planting,
cultivation, and farming services performed under an Industrial
Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.  Andrew D.
Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs,
will represent Bobby Toon in these proceedings under Neely Brien
Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Conyea Farms, LLC as its
legal representative, 3030 ST RT 1241, Hickory, KY 42051, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Conyea Farms,
LLC for planting, cultivation, and farming services performed under
an Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.
Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, will represent Conyea Farms, LLC in these proceedings under
Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Jerry Holloway as its
legal representative, 274 ST RT 339E, Mayfield, KY 42066, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Jerry Holloway
for planting, cultivation, and farming services performed under an
Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.
Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, will represent Jerry Holloway in these proceedings under
Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly
rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Brad Mathis, as its legal
representative, 330 Creston Road, Melber, KY 42069, to represent
its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy matter.  The
Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Brad Mathis for planting,
cultivation, and farming services performed under an Industrial
Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.  Andrew D.
Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs,
will represent Brad Mathis in these proceedings under Neely Brien
Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Gary Riley, as its legal
representative, 1363 ST RT 1710, Mayfield KY 42066, to represent
its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy matter.  The
Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Gary Riley for planting,
cultivation, and farming services performed under an Industrial
Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.  Andrew D.
Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs,
will represent Gary Riley in these proceedings under Neely Brien
Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Brent Shultz, as its legal
representative, 1265 ST RT 1890, Mayfield, KY 42066, to represent
its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy matter.  The
Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Brent Shultz for planting,
cultivation, and farming services performed under an Industrial
Hemp Production Agreement entered with the Debtor.  Andrew D.
Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs,
will represent Brent Shultz in these proceedings under Neely Brien
Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of engagement and hourly rates.

Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien Wilson &
Toombs, has retained as legal counsel by Ray Keith Mathis, as its
legal representative, 780 Doyle Road, Hickory, KY 42051, to
represent its interests in all proceedings in this bankruptcy
matter.  The Debtor, GenCanna Global USA Inc., owes Ray Keith
Mathis for planting, cultivation, and farming services performed
under an Industrial Hemp Production Agreement entered with the
Debtor.  Andrew D. Leonard and Sam Boyd Neely, III, of Neely Brien
Wilson & Toombs, will represent Ray Keith Mathis in these
proceedings under Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs's normal terms of
engagement and hourly rates.

This list will be supplemented as necessary as more parties in
interest employ the services of Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs.

The Firm can be reached at:

          Neely Brien Wilson & Toombs, PLLC
          Andrew D. Leonard, Esq.
          S. Boyd "Bo" Neely, III, Esq.
          238 North 7th Street
          Mayfield, KY 42066
          E-mail: andrew@nbwtlaw.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/xnG4E7

                   About GenCanna Global USA

GenCanna Global USA, Inc. -- https://gencanna.com/ -- is a
vertically-integrated producer of hemp and hemp-derived CBD
products with a focus on delivering social, economic, and
environmental impact through seed-to-scale agricultural
production.

GenCanna Global USA was the subject of an involuntary Chapter 11
proceeding (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 20-50133-GRS) filed on Jan.
24, 2020.  The involuntary petition was signed by alleged creditors
Pinnacle, Inc., Crawford Sales, Inc., and Integrity/Architecture,
PLLC.  

On Feb., 6, 2020, GenCanna Global USA, Inc., consented to the
involuntary petition and on Feb. 5, 2020 two debtor affiliates,
GenCanna Global, Inc. and Hemp Kentucky, LLC filed their own
voluntary chapter 11 petitions under the Bankruptcy Code.  Laura
Day DelCotto, Esq., at DELCOTTO LAW GROUP PLLC, is representing the
petitioners.

The Debtors tapped Huron Consulting Services LLC is as operational
advisor, Jefferies LLC as financial advisor, and Benesch
Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP along with Dentons Bingham
Greenebaum LLP as the Company's legal counsel in connection with
the Chapter 11 case.  Epig is the claims agent, maintaining the
page https://dm.epiq11.com/GenCanna


GENERAL NUTRITION: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa1, Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded General Nutrition Centers,
Inc.'s corporate family rating to Caa1 from B3, its probability of
default rating to Caa1-PD from B3-PD, its senior secured term loan
B2 to Caa2 from B3, senior secured FILO term loan to B1 from Ba3,
and its speculative grade liquidity rating to SGL-4 from SGL-3. The
outlook remains negative.

"GNC's downgrade reflects its over $600 million of debt coming due
before March 2021 as it continues to work to stabilize its
operating income and executes its business realignment", said
Moody's Vice President, Christina Boni. Moody's anticipates that
GNC can continue to generate over $75 million in free cash flow and
fund its upcoming $159 million convertible debt maturity with
excess cash and its revolver availability.

Downgrades:

Issuer: General Nutrition Centers, Inc.

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Caa1-PD from B3-PD

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-4 from
  SGL-3

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa1 from B3

  Senior Secured Term Loan B2, Downgraded to Caa2 (LGD4) from
  B3 (LGD4)

  Senior Secured FILO Term Loan, Downgraded to B1 (LGD2) from
  Ba3 (LGD2)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: General Nutrition Centers, Inc.

  Outlook, Remains Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

GNC's Caa1 rating is constrained by its weak credit metrics as
domestic comparable store sales remain tepid and operating earnings
remain under pressure despite its continued store rationalization
and expense reductions. GNC's Moody's adjusted debt/EBITDA of about
4.0x is high when compared to the company's overall current public
valuation. The ratings also recognize that its capital structure
still must be refinanced as its $159 million convert is due August
2020 and its $449 million term loan is due in March 2021. GNC's
EBITA/interest expense at 1.3x limits its ability to absorb a
significantly higher cost of capital with the needed refinancing of
its debt maturities. Nevertheless, GNC's credit profile is
supported by the company's well-known brand name in its target
markets in the vitamin, mineral, and nutritional supplement
category due to favorable demographic trends in the United States.

Also considered is the potential risk arising from adverse
publicity and product liability claims with regard to certain
products sold by GNC, particularly diet products and herbs, two
faddish product categories that are more exposed to such risks and
earnings volatility. The company is highly dependent upon consumer
perception of product safety and quality as well as those of its
competitors. Perception can be significantly influenced by
scientific research or findings, national media coverage, and other
publicity related to its use.

Harbin Pharmaceuticals $300 million convertible preferred stock
investment in the company represents approximately 40.1% of the
voting rights of the common stock, on an as-converted basis. Harbin
will have the ability to significantly influence the outcome of any
matter submitted to a stockholder vote of all shareholders.

The negative outlook incorporates its concerns that operating
performance has yet to stabilize at a lower profitability level
despite its initiatives to improve its market positioning. The
outlook also reflects the risk that its capital structure may not
be refinanced at par and on economic terms well in advance of its
upcoming term loan maturity.

GNC's ratings could be upgraded over time if the company
demonstrates consistent stable to improving same store sales while
maintaining RCF to net debt at or above the mid-teens. An upgrade
would require GNC to address all existing maturities on reasonably
economic terms and to sustain debt/EBITDA below 4.0x.

Ratings could be downgraded if the company were to see a material
decline in sales trends or operating margins, either through a
weakening competitive profile or material product-related risks.
Ratings could also be downgraded if upcoming maturities are not
addressed well in advance.

General Nutrition Centers, Inc., headquartered in Pittsburgh, PA,
is a diversified, multi-channel business model which generates
revenue from product sales through company-owned retail stores,
domestic and international franchise activities, third-party
contract manufacturing, e-commerce and corporate partnerships. As
of September 30, 2019, GNC had approximately 7,800 locations, of
which approximately 5,700 retail locations are in the United States
(including approximately 1,900 Rite Aid licensed
store-within-a-store locations) and franchise operations in
approximately 50 countries.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.


GENESIS CARE: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B'; Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating and issue
ratings on Genesis Care to 'B' from 'B+'. The recovery rating on
the company's senior secured debt remains unchanged at '3' (50%).
At the same time, S&P has removed the ratings from CreditWatch,
where it placed them with negative implications on Dec. 17, 2019.
S&P also assigned its 'B' issue credit ratings to the company's
proposed incremental term loan B, with a recovery rating of '3'
(50%).

"We lowered the ratings to reflect our view that Genesis Care is
less likely to receive extraordinary support from its majority
shareholder China Resources (Holdings) Co. Ltd. (CRH) than we
previously anticipated. The negative outlook reflects our view that
the group's highly leveraged balance sheet limits the group's
ability to accommodate earnings underperformance associated with
the integration of the largely debt-funded acquisition of 21st
Century Oncology (21C)," S&P said.

"In our view, the 21C acquisition is a sizable business that
increases Genesis Care's exposure to the U.S. market and signifies
the company's evolving international growth strategy away from
China's market. The combination of a smaller, potential earnings
contribution from China, the dilution of CRH's shareholding, and
KKR Core Fund's increased share ownership of Genesis Care has led
us to believe that CRH is less likely to provide timely
extraordinary support to Genesis Care if the company were to face
unexpected stress," the rating agency said.

The rating on Genesis Care reflects the company's solid and growing
market position in the Australian oncology market. The group's
highly leveraged balance sheet and integration risks associated
with the group's acquisition-led strategy into the U.S. market
temper the strengths. S&P believes that Genesis Care has limited
headroom for underperformance at the 'B' rating level while it
integrates 21C and executes on existing growth initiatives.

"Genesis Care has grown rapidly over the past five years, and we
expect the company to remain growth focused through tuck-in
acquisitions and building out new sites. That said, we expect some
deleveraging over the next two years as Genesis Care implements its
operating model across the 21C locations and achieves material cost
savings," S&P said.

In S&P's view, the acquisition of 21C is transformational to
Genesis Care's business. The acquisition expands Genesis Care's
scale of operations and provides further growth opportunities into
a new and developed healthcare market. Post the acquisition,
earnings will be approximately equally represented from its home
country Australia (42% proforma EBITDA as of September 2019,
company's measure) and from the U.S. (44%). The remaining earnings
will be derived from its growing European operations (14%). The
U.S. is a large and ageing population that will drive increased
patient demand for cancer care and treatment. S&P believes that
corporate and legal risks associated with 21C's business can be
accommodated since the previous chapter 11 restructuring has
addressed legacy control and governance issues.

"We note that in the U.S., the reimbursement environment is not as
favorable as Genesis Care's other markets. We believe the company
is subject to reimbursement risk with about 45% of 21C's revenues
derived from commercial payors, while Medicare (U.S.) provides 55%.
21C's larger scale offers some negotiating power with its
commercial payors, resulting in a large proportion of 21C's payor
contracts containing locked-in price set-ups for the next two to
three years, providing some pricing certainty," S&P said.

Genesis Care's enlarged scale of operations and improved geographic
diversity will lessen the risk from unfavorable economic,
reimbursement, or regulatory developments in a specific country.
Although, Medicare (U.S.)-sourced revenues are a meaningful
proportion of Genesis Care's proforma revenues, it is balanced out
by a similar-size pool of globally diversified private payors and
other global government payors. In particular, S&P views the
Australian healthcare services market as supportive of Genesis
Care's operations given that the country has a long, stable history
of a favorable legislative and reimbursement regime.

While S&P views Genesis Care as a scale player within the radiation
oncology and cancer care segments, the company is also a somewhat
narrowly focused healthcare provider. Genesis Care's earnings are
largely derived from radiation therapy methods across a wide range
of cancer treatments, cardiology treatments, and physician
consultations. In S&P's view, 21C's integrated cancer care and
radiotherapy services' strategically located clinics, together with
21C's focus on local market leadership and quality patient care,
are essential to maintaining 21C's market position and referral
relationships in a fragmented and competitive market.

"In our view, the predominantly debt-funded US$1.1 billion 21C
transaction, in combination with its large operating lease
commitments, burdens Genesis Care's leverage. Under our base case,
we expect adjusted leverage (debt-to-EBITDA ratio) to reduce to
about 7x by June 30, 2021, with a deleveraging profile to about 6x
in subsequent years. Revenue realized from growth initiatives that
the company implemented in prior fiscal periods, combined with
operational efficiencies and synergies at 21C, should drive this
deleveraging trend. As Genesis Care pursues its growth
opportunities, there may be a lag in earnings recognition between
initial setup costs of sites and the subsequent revenue
recognition," S&P said.

"Although we forecast a deleveraging trend, the company's elevated
leverage from the outset provides limited rating buffer while it
seeks to integrate 21C. In addition, we expect Genesis Care to
continue its growth trajectory, which may limit its ability to
deleverage from current high levels. Accordingly, integration
challenges at 21C that constrain anticipated revenue growth and
cost savings could undermine the group's rate of deleveraging.
Nonetheless, we view the strength of its major shareholders, track
record of offshore expansion into Europe, and realization of
operating efficiency gains as credit positives in this process,"
the rating agency said.

The negative outlook reflects Genesis Care's highly leveraged
balance sheet, leaving it with limited headroom for
underperformance at the 'B' rating while it integrates 21C over the
next 12 months.

Rating pressure could emerge if debt to EBITDA sustainably exceeds
7.5x or EBITDA interest coverage is sustained materially below 2x.
S&P could also lower the rating if the company is unable to sustain
positive free operating cash flow and healthy revenue growth. These
weaker credit metrics could be the result of an inability to
realize anticipated revenue growth from the integration of 21C,
failure to realize synergy targets, or the company continuing to
pursue an overly aggressive growth program, including further
debt-funded mergers and acquisitions.

S&P could revise the outlook to stable if the company makes solid
progress in integrating 21C that facilitates steady deleveraging
over the next six to 12 months consistent with its base case of
healthy revenue growth and free cash flow generation.


GFL ENVIRONMENTAL: S&P Puts 'B' ICR on Watch Positive on IPO Launch
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on waste services
company GFL Environmental Inc., including its 'B' issuer credit
rating on the company, on CreditWatch with positive implications.

GFL intends to raise about C$2.9 billion, including about C$2
billion of equity from an IPO and about C$900 million from issuing
tangible equity units.  S&P believes the company intends to use the
proceeds to repay debt outstanding and pay related fees and
expenses.

The CreditWatch placement reflects S&P's view that the planned IPO
is likely to close within the coming weeks and contribute to a
material reduction in GFL's high debt load with adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA approaching S&P's 6x upgrade trigger in 2020. The
rating agency anticipates that the lower debt levels following the
IPO should also contribute to positive free operating cash flow
(FOCF) and interest coverage ratios considerably above 2x.

"The CreditWatch placement reflects the high likelihood that we
could raise our issuer credit rating on GFL by one notch at the
close of its recently launched IPO. We intend to resolve the
CreditWatch well within the next 90 days," S&P said.

"We could raise our ratings if the IPO closes and we expect
adjusted debt-to-pro forma EBITDA to approach 6x while the company
maintains adjusted EBITDA interest coverage significantly above 2x.
In this scenario, we would expect GFL to generate positive annual
FOCF and see a lower likelihood that the company could make
material acquisitions that return leverage substantially above 6x
for more than 12 months," the rating agency said.

GFL, headquartered in Vaughan, Ont., is an environmental services
company providing solid waste, infrastructure, and soil
remediation, as well as liquid waste management services through
its platform of facilities across Canada and the U.S. S&P expects
GFL to generate annual revenue of more than C$3 billion (split
about equally between Canada and the U.S.).


GL BRANDS: Accell Audit Replaces Sadler Gibb as Accountants
-----------------------------------------------------------
GL Brands, Inc., dismissed Sadler, Gibb & Associates, L.L.C., as
the Company's independent registered public accounting firm on Feb.
24, 2020.  The Company's Board of Directors approved the dismissal
of the Former Accounting Firm.

The reports of Sadler Gibb on the Company's financial statements as
of and for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2019 and 2018,
contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and was not
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting
principles, except that the reports of the Former Accounting Firm
on the Company's financial statements as of and for the years ended
June 30, 2019 and 2018, contained an explanatory paragraph which
noted that there was substantial doubt as to the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern because of the Company's financial
condition.

During the fiscal years ending June 30, 2019 and 2018, and during
the interim period through Feb. 24, 2020, there (i) have been no
disagreements with the Former Accounting Firm on any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure,
or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of the Former Accounting Firm, would
have caused the Former Accounting Firm to make reference to the
subject matter of those disagreements in its reports on the
financial statements for such years, and (ii) were no reportable
events of the kind referenced in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation
SK.

On or about Feb. 24, 2020, the Company engaged Accell Audit &
Compliance as the Company's independent registered public
accounting firm.  The Board approved the decision to engage the New
Accounting Firm.

The Company said it has not consulted with the New Accounting Firm
during its two most recent fiscal years or during any subsequent
interim period prior to Feb. 24, 2020 (the date of the New
Accounting Firm's appointment), regarding (i) the application of
accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed
or proposed; (ii) the type of audit opinion that might be rendered
on the Company's financial statements, and neither a written report
was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that the
New Accounting Firm concluded was an important factor considered by
the Company in reaching a decision as to an accounting, auditing or
financial reporting issue; or (iii) any matter that was either the
subject of disagreement (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of
Regulation SK and the related instructions) or a reportable event
(within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation SK).

                         About GL Brands

Headquartered in Las Vegas, NV, GL Brands (formerly Freedom Leaf)
-- https://www.glbrands.com/ -- is a multinational hemp consumer
packaged goods company that creates authentic, enduring and
culturally relevant brands engaged in the development and sale of
cannabis-derived wellness products.  Through its premier brands
Green Lotus and Irie CBD, GL Brands delivers a full portfolio of
hemp-derived CBD products, including tinctures, soft gels, gummies,
sparkling beverages, vapes, flower and topical segments to promote
greater wellness and balance, in the U.S. and throughout the
world.

Freedom Leaf reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $12.73 million for the year ended June 30, 2019,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $4.63
million for the year ended June 30, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2019,
the Company had $19.46 million in total assets, $13.43 million in
total liabilities, and $6.02 million in total stockholders'
equity.

Sadler, Gibb & Associates, LLC, in Salt Lake City, UT, the
Company's auditor since 2018, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report dated Nov. 14, 2019, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net
capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.


GLENVIEW HEALTH: Monticello Banking Objects to Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Monticello Banking Company objects to the Disclosure Statement
filed by Debtor Glenview Health Care Facility, Inc.  

In support of this Objection, Monticello points out that:

   * The Monticello Claim consists of post-petition interest fees
and other expenses, for which the Debtor is obligated pursuant to
the terms of the documents evidencing Monticello's claims and these
obligations are also secured by the Collateral.  The Disclosure
Statement does not disclose the Debtor’s continuing obligations
for the Other Charges.

   * The Disclosure Statement does not include liquidation values
for Debtor's assets, or any attempt to explain how the assets might
be valued.

   * The Debtor has disclosed $600,000 in its accounts receivable,
but with no explanation for why that amount is outstanding, whether
such amount is collectible, how Debtor plans to collect on it, or
how the collection of this large outstanding sum might affect
Debtor's operations and/or cash flow.

   * Monticello cannot make an informed judgment about its
treatment under the Plan when it does not have information about
the liquidation value of Debtor's assets or detailed information
about how Debtor arrived at its financial projections when those
same projections describe margins that leave very little room for
error.

   * Monticello cannot make an informed judgment when the
Disclosure Statement includes scant information about the Debtor's
ongoing operational strategy, including a plan to collect on its
significant accounts receivable, and disclosure of its executive
compensation.

A full-text copy of Monticello Banking's objection to disclosure
dated February 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/w5qw7kk from PacerMonitor at no charge.

Counsel for Monticello Banking Company:

        Edward M. King
        Bryan J. Sisto
        FROST BROWN TODD LLC
        400 W. Market Street, 32nd Fl.
        Louisville, KY 40202
        Telephone: (502) 589-5400
        Facsimile: (502) 581-1087
        E-mail: tking@fbtlaw.com

              About Glenview Health Care Facility

Glenview Health Care Facility, Inc., owns and operates a small
health care facility with 60 beds that provides nursing home
services.

Glenview Health Care Facility sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 19-10795) in Bowling
Green, Kentucky on Aug. 1, 2019.  As of the Petition Date, the
Debtor's assets are between $1 million and $10 million; and its
liabilities are estimated within the same range.  Judge Joan A.
Lloyd oversees the Debtor's case. Mark H. Flener, Esq., is the
Debtor's counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 8 on Aug. 30, 2019, appointed two
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained Bingham Greenebaum
Doll LLP, as counsel.


GMJ MACHINE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: GMJ Machine Company, Inc.
        251 State Line Road South
        Wilmer, AL 36587

Business Description: GMJ Machine Company, Inc. manufactures
                      specialized components for the aerospace,
                      defense, general aviation, and energy
                      industries.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 27, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Alabama

Case No.: 20-10632

Judge: Hon. Jerry C. Oldshue

Debtor's Counsel: Robert M. Galloway, Esq.
                  GALLOWAY, WETTERMARK & RUTENS, LLP
                  3263 Cottage Hill Road
                  Post Office Box 16629
                  Mobile, AL 36616-0629
                  Tel: 251-476-4493

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Joel K. Parden, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                      https://is.gd/rf0RvE


GRANITE LAKES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Granite Lakes LLC    
        31830 NE Cherry Valley Rd
        Duvall, WA 98019

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 27, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Washington

Case No.: 20-10635

Judge: Hon. Christopher M. Alston

Debtor's Counsel: James E. Dickmeyer, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF JAMES E DICKMEYER PC
                  520 Kirkland Way Ste 400
                  PO Box 2623
                  Kirkland, WA 98083-2623
                  Tel: (425) 889-2324
                  E-mail: jim@jdlaw.net

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Robert Russell, manager.

A full-text copy of the petition is available  for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                       https://is.gd/v4BKcD


H&F MANAGEMENT: Gets Interim Approval to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Craig A. Gargotta of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas authorized H&F Management Company Inc. to
use the cash collateral of the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
to pay the post-petition operating expenses.

The Comptroller has a blanket security interest in all of Debtor's
assets including but not limited to equipment and account
receivables. The Comptroller claimed a debt in the approximate
amount of $584,132.

The Debtor will provide adequate protection to the Comptroller, in
the form of the following:

     (A) Replacement liens on all postpetition accounts receivable,
equipment, furniture and fixtures and proceeds. The Debtor ratifies
and confirms the pre-petition liens of the Comptroller in its
inventory and accounts receivable and equipment as being perfected
pre-petition;

     (B) The Debtor will timely file returns and pay all
post-petition tax liabilities (including mixed beverage gross
receipts, mixed beverage sales, franchise, and sales & use taxes).


     (C) The Debtor will make monthly adequate protection payments
to the Comptroller in the amount of $3,000 beginning on Feb. 15 and
continuing monthly thereafter until the earlier of: confirmation of
the Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization or June 1, 2020.
Should a plan of reorganization not be confirmed by June 1, 2020,
then Debtor will make monthly adequate protection payments to the
Comptroller in the amount of $5,000 beginning on June 15 until Dec.
31, 2020 at which time Debtor's authorization to use cash
collateral will cease unless otherwise authorized by further Order
of the Court.
  
A copy of the Order is available at PacerMonitor.com at
https://is.gd/FrCKxW at no charge.

                   About H&F Management Company

H&F Management Company Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 19-52918) on Dec.
12, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of between
$500,001 and $1 million.  Judge Craig A. Gargotta oversees the
case.  Villa & White LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.



H.R.P. II: Lake County Treasurer Objects to Disclosures & Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor Lake County Treasurer objects to the disclosure statement
filed by Debtor H.R.P. II LLC on Dec. 12, 2019.

Lake County Treasurer asserts that the Debtor's disclosure
statement does not contain adequate information:

  * The Debtor's disclosure statement and plan wholly fail to
mention the sale of the property located at 1717 Summer Street in
Hammond, the status of the proceeds which were to be held in trust
by the title company, and no report of sale has been filed with the
court with this information.

  * The Disclosure Statement does not disclose any information
regarding the Debtor's financial condition, the amount of funds on
hand, rents owed/paid/delinquent, and the like.  It appears from
the Debtor's monthly operating reports that it is operating at a
loss every month, but there are no other details about its true
financial condition that can be ascertained from its reports.

  * The Debtor's Plan does not provide for payment of post-petition
taxes and post-effective date taxes.

  * The Debtor has not proposed in its plan to surrender the
properties if the sale fails, re-list the property, or otherwise.
The Debtor has not paid any postpetition property taxes and will be
unable to do so based on the limited income information available
to the Creditor through the Debtors operating reports.

Creditor Lake County Treasurer objects to Paragraph 6.3 of the
Debtor's Plan which bars amendments to all claims after the
effective date of the plan.  This paragraph prevents the Treasurer
from amending its claim to include any post-petition property tax
debts, which must be paid pursuant to state and federal bankruptcy
law.

A full-text copy of Lake County's objection to disclosure and plan
dated February 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/r42htp6 from PacerMonitor at no charge.  

Attorney for Creditor:

       Kimberly A. Mouratides (30778-45)
       120 W. Clark Street
       Crown Point, Indiana 46307
       Tel: (219) 865-8376
       Fax: (219) 865-4054
       E=mail:Kimberly.Mouratides@gmail.com

                    About H.R.P. II LLC

H.R.P. II LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Ind. Case No. 17-21695) on June 15, 2017.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated assets of less than $1
million and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge James R.
Ahler oversees the case.  Fox Rothschild LLP is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


HESTON HAULING: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Heston Hauling, LLC
        6397 B Portal Way
        Ferndale, WA 98248

Business Description: Heston Hauling, LLC offers automotive towing

                      services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 28, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Washington

Case No.: 20-10655

Debtor's Counsel: Steven C. Hathaway, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN C. HATHAWAY
                  3811 Consolidation Ave.
                  P.O. Box 2147
                  Bellingham, WA 98227
                  Tel: 360-676-0529
                  E-mail: shathaway@expresslaw.com

Total Assets: $1,550,694

Total Liabilities: $477,257

The petition was signed by Christopher Heston, managing member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's five unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/6fdNSz


IDC ENTERPRISES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: IDC Enterprises, Inc.
        450 White Bird Street
        Grangeville, ID 83530

Business Description: IDC Enterprises, Inc. is a privately held
                      company that owns some equipment in Thorne
                      Bay, AK.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 27, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Idaho

Case No.: 20-20081

Judge: Hon. Terry L. Myers

Debtor's Counsel: D. Blair Clark, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF D. BLAIR CLARK, PC
                  1509 Tyrell Lane, Suite 180
                  Boise, ID 83706
                  Tel: (208) 475-2050
                  E-mail: dbc@dbclarklaw.com;
                         jeffrey@dbclarklaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $100,000 to $500,000

The petition was signed by Jason Lunders, president.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors at the time of the filing.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                     https://is.gd/A8VFYq


IMAGEWARE SYSTEMS: Signs $2M Securities Purchase Pact with Triton
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ImageWare Systems, Inc., entered into a securities purchase
agreement with Triton Funds LP, which Purchase Agreement provides
the Company the right to sell to Triton, and Triton is obligated to
purchase, up to $2.0 million worth of shares of the Company's
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, under the Purchase
Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Purchase
Agreement, the purchase price of the Common Stock will be based on
the number of shares of Common Stock equal to the amount in U.S.
Dollars that the Company intends to sell to the Investor to be set
forth in each written notice sent to the Investor by the Company
and delivered to the Investor, divided by the lowest daily volume
weighted average price of the Company's Common stock listed on the
OTC Markets during the five business days prior to closing.  The
Closing of the purchase of the Purchased Shares as set forth in the
Purchase Notice will occur no later than three business days
following receipt of the Purchased Shares by the Investor.

The Offering was made pursuant to an effective registration
statement on Form S-3 (Registration Statement Number 333-225935),
as previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 10, 2018, and a related prospectus supplement filed on Feb.
21, 2020.  The Offering will terminate upon the earlier date of
either (i) that date which the Investor has purchased an aggregate
of $2.0 million in Purchased Shares pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement; or (i) March 31, 2020.  The Company intends to use the
proceeds from the Offering for general working capital purposes.

The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations,
warranties and agreements by the Company, customary conditions to
closing, indemnification obligations of the Company and Triton.

                   About ImageWare Systems

Headquartered in San Diego, CA, ImageWare Systems, Inc. --
http://www.iwsinc.com/-- is a developer of mobile and cloud-based
identity management solutions, providing two-factor, biometric and
multi-factor cloud-based authentication solutions for the
enterprise.  The company delivers next-generation biometrics as an
interactive and scalable cloud-based solution.  ImageWare brings
together cloud and mobile technology to offer two-factor,
biometric, and multi-factor authentication for smartphone users,
for the enterprise, and across industries.

ImageWare reported a net loss available to common shareholders of
$16.46 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net
loss available to common shareholders of $13.71 million.  As of
Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had $11.76 million in total assets,
$8.66 million in total liabilities, $8.71 million in series C
convertible redeemable preferred stock, and a total shareholders'
deficit of $5.61 million.

Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., in San Diego, California, the Company's
auditor since 2011, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated March 27, 2019, citing that the Company has incurred
recurring operating losses and is dependent on additional financing
to fund operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


INNOVIVA INC: S&P Withdraws 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating
-----------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew the 'B+' issuer credit rating on
Innoviva Inc. at the company's request following the full repayment
of its senior secured term loan. At the same time, S&P withdrew all
of its issue-level ratings on the company. At the time of the
withdrawal, the rating agency's outlook on Innoviva was stable.


ION GEOPHYSICAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Neg., Affirms 'CCC+' ICR
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed the 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on
U.S.-based seismic data company ION Geophysical Corp. and affirmed
its 'B-' issue-level rating on the company's second-lien notes with
a '2' recovery rating.  The rating agency revised the outlook to
negative from stable.

"Our outlook revision to negative reflects the company's need to
refinance its second-lien notes due in December 2021 as capital
markets for oil and gas service companies remain challenging.
Additionally, we do not expect the company to generate sufficient
discretionary cash flow or have enough availability on its credit
facility to address the entire maturity. Therefore, in our opinion,
there is greater risk of the company executing a transaction we
could view as distressed," S&P said.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's view that the company could
have difficulty addressing the maturity of its approximately $121
million notes in December 2021 given challenging capital markets
and weakened offshore market conditions. In addition, S&P believes
these conditions elevate the risk ION could pursue a refinancing it
would view as distressed and of a selective default.

"We could lower ratings if liquidity weakens such that we expect
ION could have difficulty supporting its interest expenses and
other obligations, or if the company announces a transaction we
could view as distressed. This would most likely occur if E&P
companies fail to increase spending in seismic activity or capital
markets remain challenged for oil and gas service companies.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if ION improves liquidity
sufficiently enough to address upcoming debt refinancing
requirements without compromising liquidity. Such an event would
likely be in conjunction with market conditions strengthening
following improved capital spending by the E&P industry and
improvements in capital markets," the rating agency said.


IOWA FERTILIZER: S&P Raises Debt Rating to 'BB-'; Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its issue-level rating on Iowa Fertilizer
Company LLC's (IFCo) senior secured tax-exempt bonds to 'BB-' from
'B+'. The '1' recovery rating is unchanged, indicating a very high
recovery (90%-100%) under a hypothetical payment default scenario.

The Wever nitrogen fertilizer facility began commercial operations
in mid-2017. The plant has an ammonia production capacity of 2,425
short tons per day (STPD), but is capable of achieving up to 2,820
STPD because the equipment installed has a higher design margin.
The upstream part of the plant produces ammonia and urea solution
(urea in liquid form produced from ammonia and carbon dioxide), and
the downstream part converts either ammonia or urea solution into
other products like granular urea, urea ammonium nitrate (UAN), or
diesel exhaust fluid (DEF).

"We based our upgrade of IFCo partly on its demonstrated ability to
maintain steady production and deliver financial results in line
with our expectations. IFCo now has two full years of operational
track record and executed a number of improvements and upgrades
that should allow it to sustain reliability by reducing downtime
and consistently run its production well above of its nameplate
capacity. We understand that unplanned outages cannot be fully
eliminated for a nitrogen fertilizer facility of this size and
scale because machinery is subject to wears and tears, but we think
all the work that IFCo has done over the past 12 months should make
operations more predictable. In our base case, we incorporated
planned downtime days and some cushion for unplanned downtime," S&P
said.

IFCo's cash flow generation and debt service coverages in 2019 were
in line with S&P's expectations, supported by a continued recovery
of U.S. nitrogen fertilizer prices after a collapse in 2016 and
2017. S&P does not expect any supply shocks such as large capacity
additions or a sustained decline in the application of nitrogen
fertilizers that could disrupt the supply-and-demand balance and
reverse the price recovery seen over the past two years. S&P's base
case and downside case nitrogen fertilizer price assumptions are
rather conservative. It determines them using historical price
distribution and then adjust for inflation. In addition, S&P's
downside case price assumptions consider changes through various
economic cycles with recoveries over time. This is because it is
highly unlikely that depressed prices will sustain indefinitely as
illustrated by historical data.

IFCo sells its ammonia, urea, and UAN at a Midwest premium given
its location in the heart of the U.S. Corn Belt, and S&P expects
this premium to remain intact. The Midwest premium is usually
determined by the freight moving nitrogen fertilizers from New
Orleans to inland distribution points. Unlike IFCo, which sells its
products within a 200-mile radius, traders and intermediaries that
buy nitrogen fertilizers from the U.S. Gulf Coast will have to pay
for barge or rail, storage, and trucking to ship the products
directly to end users or cooperatives for sale to local farmers in
the Midwest. Logical bottlenecks along the Mississippi River can
occur between the Midwest and the U.S. Gulf Coast that will cause
the premium to spike, and S&P thinks IFCo is well positioned to
capture this kind of upside. Nevertheless, this upside is not
embedded in S&P's base case because logical bottlenecks are caused
by events that are oftentimes unpredictable, such as the
Mississippi River flooding in the second quarter of 2019.

The flexibility of IFCo facility enables it to adjust its
downstream production (i.e., granular urea, UAN, and DEF) quickly
in response to sudden changes in market demand. Delayed fertilizer
application in the Midwest occurs occasionally usually due to
excessive soil moisture attributed to weather events. Even though
this can temporary affect the demand and prices of nitrogen
fertilizers, farmers must apply nitrogen into the ground later,
oftentimes during the planting season in spring, to replenish the
depleted nutrients. Therefore, while nitrogen fertilizer prices
could fall for one quarter, perhaps during the second half of a
year, S&P has seen prices recover in the following quarters as the
application season gets closer. S&P notes that users cannot apply
all nitrogen fertilizers year-round like UAN. Because the nitrogen
content in UAN as well as granular urea is much less, farmers will
likely have to purchase twice as much of UAN or granular urea in
order to get the same amount of nitrogen in ammonia. Depending on
the market condition, IFCo can sell the ammonia produced in the
upstream part of the facility to customers as is or convert it into
UAN or other products in the downstream part of the facility.

S&P thinks that IFCo may launch an opportunistic debt exchange
transaction on the 5.25% $428 million series 2013 tax-exempt
tranche due 2025 sometime in the future when it is cost effective
to do so. This bond tranche is currently trading at above par at
around $110. IFCo does not have any principal payments due between
2028 and 2030, thus resulting in very high DSCRs at above 10x under
S&P's base case. This is because the company had initially
contemplated to move some of the 2023-2025 principals from the
series 2013 tranche due 2025 out to those periods. The higher debt
service requirements between 2023 and 2025 cause the DSCRs to be
the lowest in S&P's base case, and its rating for project finance
transactions partly hinges on the minimum DSCR. The low DSCRs
between 2023 and 2025 should improve materially once IFCo launches
and successfully executes an opportunistic debt exchange
transaction. However, this transaction on its own may not lead to
an upgrade of S&P's debt rating because at that time, the rating
agency will need to reassess the market fundamentals of nitrogen
fertilizers due to, for example, its volatile nature, IFCo's
downside resilience to withstand various types of stress, or the
overall debt structure post the transaction.

S&P forecasts liquidity coverage--that is the ratio of sources of
cash to uses--of about 3.5x over the next 12-month period. Even
though its projected liquidity coverage for IFCo is quite strong,
S&P does not assess the company's liquidity as higher than neutral
for a project finance transaction. However, the rating agency
tested IFCo's liquidity in its downside scenario that measures the
company's resilience when market and operational stresses are
applied simultaneously.

Sources of cash over the next 12-month period include net operating
cash flows, $50 million working capital facility, $93.7 million
letter of credit (LOC) for the debt service reserve, and cash or
cash equivalent in other reserves, such as the major maintenance
and operating reserves. Both the working capital facility and LOC
are provided by highly S&P Global Ratings-rated bank institutions.
The total use of cash consists of principal and interest payments
of the tax-exempt bonds and other debt-related fees. The company
fully paid off its bank debt from First Abu Dhabi Bank by December
2019.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that IFCo could maintain
operational performance similar to that in 2019. S&P does not
expect any supply shocks in the form of large capacity additions or
sustained decline in the application of nitrogen fertilizers that
could disrupt the supply-and-demand balance and reverse the price
recovery seen over the past two years. S&P forecasts IFCo's debt
service coverage of about 1.9x in 2020 and expect a minimum DSCR of
1.4x in 2024 when the rating agency expects senior debt to be
higher.

"We could lower our debt rating if IFCo's operating performance
deteriorates such that DSCRs fall below 1.3x on a sustained basis.
This could stem from unforeseen operational issues that require a
full plant shutdown for an extensive period or adverse market
conditions, such as weakened nitrogen fertilizer pricing in the
U.S. Mid-west region, similar to the 2017 level," S&P said.

"We could consider an upgrade if we believed that, given the
volatile nature of nitrogen fertilizers, IFCo could consistently
achieve debt service coverage exceeding 2x in all years of our
base-case projection. This could stem from systemic changes in
nitrogen fertilizer production economics that lead to sustained
improvement of U.S. nitrogen fertilizer prices but without an
increase in natural gas feedstock cost," the rating agency said.


JACK COUNTY HOSPITAL: Chapter 9 Case Summary & 16 Unsec. Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Jack County Hospital District
          dba Faith Community Health System
          dba Faith Community Hospital
        215 Chisholm Trail
        Jacksboro, TX 76458

Bankruptcy Case No.: 20-40858

Business Description: Faith Community Hospital --
                      https://fchtexas.com/ -- is a community
                      hospital serving the residents of Jack
                      County, Texas.  It offers a wealth of
                      medical services including inpatient care,
                      minor surgeries, obstetrics, and other
                      health care services.

Chapter 9 Petition Date: February 29, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas

Debtor's Counsel: J. Robert Forshey, Esq.
                  FORSHEY & PROSTOK, LLP
                  777 Main St., Suite 1290
                  Fort Worth, TX 76102
                  Tel: (817) 877-8855
                  E-mail: bforshey@forsheyprostok.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Frank L. Beaman, chief executive
officer.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/8NxsKt

List of Debtor's 16 Unsecured Creditors:

  Entity                             Nature of Claim  Claim Amount

  ------                             ---------------  ------------
1. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas     Arbitration     $29,329,440
c/o Reed Smith, LLP                       Award
10 S Wacker Dr., 40 Flr
Chicago, IL 60606
Martin J. Bishop
Tel: 312-207-1000
Email: mbishop@reedsmith.com

2. Regions Capital Advantage, Inc.      Bank Note      $23,885,553
c/o George H. Barber
Johnston Pratt
1717 Main St., Suite 3000
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: 214-974-8000
Email: gbarber@johnstonpratt.com

3. Spirit of Texas Bank                 Bank Note       $3,051,826
Attn: Eric Anderson,
Market President
3100 Monticello, Suite 980
Dallas, TX 75205
Tel: 972-616-2010
Email: eanderson@spiritoftexasbank.com

4. Prosperity Bank                      Bank Note       $1,277,872
Attn: Eddie Lick
Regional President
101 North Prairieville St.
Athens, TX 75751
Tel: 903-675-8511
Email: eddie.lick@prosperitybanktx.com

5. G.M. "Max" Poynor                       Loan         $1,000,000
PO Box 187
Jacksboro, TX 76458
Email: gmpoynor@gmail.com

6. LaSalle Systems Leasing, Inc.           Lease          $445,814
A Division of Fifth Third Bank
6111 N. River Road
Rosemont, IL 60018
Cale Stubbe
Email: cstubbe@clasalle.com

7. GE HFS, LLC                            Lease           $235,101
PO Box 414, W-490
Milwaukee, WI 53201

8. Flex Financial                         Lease           $227,872
A Div. of Stryker Sales Corp.
1901 Romence Road Parkway
Portage, MI 49002
Tel: 269-323-7700

9. Beckman Coulter                        Lease           $141,616
250 South Kraemer Blvd.
PO Box 8000
Brea, CA 92821-8000
Tel: 714-993-5321

10. American Arbitration            Arbitration Fees      $100,400
Association
13727 Noel Rd., Suite 700
Dallas, TX 75240
Iman Hyder-Eliz
Tel: 800-277-7641
Email: imanhydereliz@adr.org

11. Beneficial Equipment                  Lease            $53,673
Finance Corp.
165 Pottstown Pike
Chester Springs, PA 19425

12. De Lage Landen                        Lease            $12,600
Financial Servs, Inc.
Rental Processing Center
1111 Old Eagle School Rd.
Wayne, PA 19087
Tel: 610-386-5000

13. United Health Care Ins.        Breach of Contract      Unknown
c/o Jamie R. Kurtz             
Robins Kaplan LLP
800 LaSalle Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2015
Tel: 800-615-3503
Email: jkurtz@robonskaplan.com

14. Humana                         Breach of Contract      Unknown
c/o Thomas Mahlum
Robins Kaplan, LLP
800 LaSalle Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Email: tmahlum@robinskaplan.com

15. Cigna Health Care              Breach of Contract      Unknown
c/o Eliot "Eli" Burriss
Holland & Knight LLP
200 Crescent Court,
Suite 1600
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: 214-964-9500
Email: eliot.burriss@hklaw.com

16. Aetna Health, Inc.             Breach of Contract      Unknown
c/o Robet Fogarty
Hahn Loeser & Parks
200 Public Square, Suite 2800
Cleveland, OH 44114
Sean Medina
Email: rjf@hahnlaw.com
       emedina@hahnlaw.com


JAGUAR HEALTH: Obtains $317,000 From Warrants Exercise
------------------------------------------------------
Jaguar Health, Inc., entered into warrant exercise agreements  with
a holder of its Series 1 warrants previously issued in the
Company's registered public offering on July 23, 2019 and its
warrants previously issued in private placements by the Company in
March through June of 2019, pursuant to which the Holder agreed to
exercise in cash its Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 458,022
shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share,
at a reduced exercise price of $0.692 per share, which is the
Minimum Price (as defined under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d)) as of
the date of such Exercise Agreements, for gross proceeds to the
Company of approximately $317,000.

The issuance of the Public Warrants and the offer and sale of
shares of Common Stock underlying the Public Warrants have been
registered on the Company's registration statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-231399) and an additional registration statement
(File No. 333-232715) filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, each of which were previously
filed with and declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.  A prospectus supplement relating to this reduction of
the exercise price for the Public Warrants will be filed with the
SEC.

The offer and sale of shares of Common Stock underlying the Bridge
Warrants has been registered on the Company's registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-233989), which was previously
filed and declared effective by the SEC.

                       About Jaguar Health

Jaguar Health, Inc. -- http://www.jaguar.health-- is a commercial
stage pharmaceuticals company focused on developing novel,
sustainably derived gastrointestinal products on a global basis.
Its wholly-owned subsidiary, Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., focuses on
developing and commercializing proprietary human gastrointestinal
pharmaceuticals for the global marketplace from plants used
traditionally in rainforest areas.  Jaguar Health's principal
executive offices are located in San Francisco, California.

Jaguar Health reported a net loss of $32.14 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $21.96 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company
had $35.63 million in total assets, $15.25 million in total
liabilities, $9 million in series A convertible preferred stock,
and total stockholders' equity of $11.38 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in San Francisco, California, the Company's auditor
since 2013, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report dated
April 10, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and an accumulated
deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern.


JAS EXPEDITED: Judge Denies Bid to Extend Time to Confirm Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joel Applebaum of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan denied the motion of JAS Expedited Trucking,
LLC to extend to April 20 the period to confirm its Chapter 11
plan.

"The existing deadline in this case was February 21, 2020.  No
order extending deadline was entered before this existing deadline
as the time for objections had not yet run and [JAS] did not seek
to shorten the objection deadline, an expedited hearing on the
motion, or other appropriate relief," Judge Applebaum wrote in his
order.

JAS filed its plan of reorganization and disclosure statement on
Jan.  Subsequent to the filing of the plan, the company received
instruction from the court as to a variety of issues that could
impede confirmation of the plan.  Areas of concern included
valuations for split claims between secured and unsecured claims on
motor vehicles and trailers.

                   About JAS Expedited Trucking

JAS Expedited Trucking, LLC, a privately held company that provides
transportation services, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.19-31434) on June 13,
2019.  In the petition signed by Anthony Freeland, II, member and
general manager, the Debtor disclosed $1,620,025 in assets and
$2,097,159 in liabilities.  Judge Joel D. Applebaum oversees the
case.  The Debtor is represented by David W. Brown, Esq., at the
Law Office of David W. Brown PLLC.


JAY D. SEXTON: Selling Four Tucson Condo Units
----------------------------------------------
Jay D. Sexton and Ruby L. Sexton ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Arizona to authorize the sale of the following four
condominium properties in Tucson, Arizona: (i) 832 S. Langley
Avenue, Unit 201; (ii) 828 S. Langley Avenue, Unit 105; (iii) 826
S. Langley Avenue, Unit 102; and (iv) 826 S. Langley Avenue, Unit
106,

The Debtors own the four condominium properties.  In addition, they
own property located at 211 N. Green Street, Algonquin, Illinois
and 621 N. Third Avenue, Tucson, Arizona.

The Debtors propose to sell the four condominium properties to fund
their Estate and maximize the distribution to their creditors.  Any
Purchase Agreement for the sale of the properties is subject to
Court approval.

On Aug. 29, 2019, the Debtors filed an application to employ
Bridget Barry of Pima Valley Realty to sell the property located at
832 S. Langley Avenue, Suite 201.  The Court approved Ms. Barry's
employment.  The Debtors intend to have Ms. Barry sell the other
three properties as well.

The liens, claims and interests against the condominium properties
are:

     a. 832 S. Langley Avenue, Unit 201: The property is subject to
a deed of trust in favor of Louis A. Banks and Eddice M. Cornelius.
The deed of trust secures a promissory note executed on March 16,
2017.  On Aug. 19, 2019, the Court entered an Order [DE 198] which
approved the terms and conditions of a Stipulation for Treatment of
Class 8C Louis A. Banks and Eddice Cornelius between the Debtors
and Banks and Cornelius for their secured claim in the amount of
$62,000 plus 6.5% interest per annum.

     b. 828 S. Langley Avenue, Unit 105: The property is subject to
a deed of trust in favor of Nova Financial and Investment Corp.
The deed of trust secures a promissory note executed on Aug. 9,
2004.  The interest in the deed of trust was subsequently assigned
to Ocwen Loan Servicing on June 17, 2014.  On Aug. 19, 2019, the
Court entered an Order which approved the terms and conditions of a
Stipulation Regarding Treatment for Class 8b - Newrez, LLC, doing
business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, between the Debtors and
Newrez, LLC for its secured claim in the amount of $44,939 plus
6.5% interest per annum.

     c. 826 S. Langley Avenue, Unit 102: The property is subject to
a deed of trust in favor of First Magnus Financial Corporation.
The deed of trust secures a promissory note executed on April 28,
2006.  The interest in the deed of trust was subsequently assigned
to Nationstar Mortgage, LLC on Jan. 26, 2018.  On Aug. 26, 2019,
the Court entered an Order which approved the terms and conditions
of a Stipulation Regarding Claim Treatment between the Debtors and
Creditor Nationstar Mortgage dba Mr. Cooper for its secured claim
in the amount of $75,000 plus 5% interest per annum.

     d. 826 S. Langley Avenue, Unit 106: The property is subject to
a deed of trust in favor of GN Mortgage, LLC. The deed of trust
secures a promissory note executed on May 2006.  The interest in
the deed of trust was subsequently assigned to Deutsch Bank Trust
Company Americas, as Trustee for Residential Accredit Loans, Inc.,
Mortgage Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-QS7
and its loan servicer, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC.  On June 4, 2019,
the Court entered an Order which approved the terms and conditions
of a Stipulation Re: Treatment of Claim Under Debtors’ Proposed
Chapter 11 Plan between the Debtors and Deutsch Bank Trust Company
Americas for its secured claim in the amount of $73,179 plus 6.5%
per annum.

By the Motion, the Debtors ask Court issuance of an order, pursuant
to Section 363(b), Bankruptcy Rules 2002(a)(2), 6004 and 9014,
Local Rules 6004-1 and 9014-1 approving: (1) the sale of the
properties free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances, and
interests; and (2) payment of closing costs related thereto,
including brokerage commissions.

The sales are in the best interest of the estate.  All valid
secured claims with a properly perfected lien on the Real Property
will be fully paid fThe sales are in the best interest of the
estate.  All valid secured claims with a properly perfected lien on
the Real Property will be fully paid.

Any prospective buyer needs the assurance that all sales are final
and non-appealable.  Accordingly, the Debtors ask that the Court
eliminates the 14-day stay period under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

Jay D. Sexton and Ruby L. Sexton sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-03317) on March 30, 2018.  The Debtors
tapped Eric Slocum Sparks, Esq. at Eric Slocum Sparks, PC as
counsel.



JOSEPH'S TRANSPORTATION: May Continue Access to Cash Until April 30
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized Joseph's Transportation, Inc. to use
cash collateral through April 30, 2020 pursuant to the terms and
conditions as identified on the record at the hearing and as
previously allowed.

The Debtor is required to file a further Motion for Use of Cash
Collateral on or before  April 15 and the Court will hold a hearing
on April 30, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. Objections must be filed by 4:30
p.m. on April 22.

                  About Joseph's Transportation

Joseph's Transportation is a family-owned and operated full
transportation company that has been serving the New England area
for more than 40 years.  Joseph's Transportation filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 18-14282) on Nov. 11, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Joseph Albano III, president, the Debtor was estimated to
have assets of $500,001 to $1 million and liabilities of the same
range.  The Law Office of Gary W. Cruickshank serves as counsel to
the Debtor.



JUST ONE MORE: May Borrow More Than $5.5M from SF V CLE Lending
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Caryl E. Delano authorized Just One More Restaurant Corp.,
and Just One More Holding Corp., (through their chief restructuring
officer, Gerard A. McHale, Jr.), and Robert E. Tardif, Jr., as
Chapter 7 Trustee for the estate of debtors Bruce E. Bozzi, Sr. and
Walter J. Ganzi, Jr., to obtain up to $5,534,918.18 of aggregate
post-petition senior secured super priority DIP financing
(consisting of delayed draw term loan facility) from SF V CLE
Lending, LLC.  

The DIP borrowers may borrow up to $2,000,000 on an interim basis
at any time prior to the earlier of February 26, 2020 and the entry
of the final order, and up to an additional $3,534,918.18, on a
final basis.

The Court authorized the DIP borrowers to grant SF V CLE Lending,
as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as pre-petition
lender, adequate protection with respect to the use of the cash
collateral and any diminution in the value of the pre-petition
collateral.  

A copy of the interim DIP order is available for free at
https://is.gd/xurgOY from PacerMonitor.com.

                      About Just One More
     
Just One More Restaurant Corp. holds the Palm Restaurant
steakhouse's intellectual property -- a series of trademarks and
service marks, design elements of the Palm.  JOMR licenses the Palm
IP to the Palm Restaurants through individual licensing agreements.
There are 24 Palm Restaurants currently operating in the United
States and Mexico. The Debtors do not own any of the Palm
Restaurants.

Just One More Restaurant Corp. and Just One More Holding Corp.
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 19-01947) on March 7, 2019. At the time of
the filing, Just One More Restaurant estimated assets of between
$100 million and $500 million and liabilities of between $10
million to $50 million.  Just One More Holding estimated assets and
liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million.

The Debtors tapped Berger Singerman LLP as their legal counsel, and
McHale, P.A. as their restructuring advisor.





LANDSTREET PROJECT: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Landstreet Project LLC
        1303 53rd Street
        Suite 302
        Brooklyn, NY 11219

Business Description: Landstreet Project LLC is primarily engaged
                      in renting and leasing real estate
                      properties (except buildings).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 27, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York

Case No.: 20-41245

Debtor's Counsel: Isaac Nutovic, Esq.
                  NUTOVIC & ASSOCIATES
                  261 Madison Avenue, 26th Madison
                  New York, NY 10016
                  Tel: 212-421-9100

Estimated Assets: $50,000 to $100,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Abraham P. Wieder, manager.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors at the time of the filing.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                     https://is.gd/1yvdX4


LD INTERMEDIATE: Moody's Confirms Caa1 CFR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service confirmed LD Intermediate Holdings,
Inc.'s Caa1 Corporate Family Rating and Caa1-PD Probability of
Default Rating. At the same time, Moody's upgraded the company's
first lien senior secured credit facility, consisting of a $30
million revolver and a $340 million term loan to B2 from B3. The
outlook is stable. Moody's also assigned a Speculative Grade
Liquidity Rating of SGL-3. This concludes the review for upgrade
that was initiated on May 22, 2019.

Moody's confirmed KLD's Caa1 CFR following its announcement that on
December 19, 2019, the company completed a reverse IPO merger with
Pivotal Acquisition Corp, a publicly traded special purpose
acquisition company. In connection with the SPAC transaction, the
company issued a new $200 million 8% convertible debentures due
2024 (unrated by Moody's), which bear an annual interest rate of 4%
in cash and 4% in kind, payable quarterly, an additional 3% in kind
interest will be added to the principal amount annually in
December. Proceeds from debentures were used to retire $125 million
of senior secured second lien term loan, term-out revolver
borrowings and pay transaction fees and expenses.

"The decision to change the outlook to stable reflects Moody's view
that the SPAC transaction along with expectation for continued
growth in eDiscovery segment affords the company greater financial
flexibility while addressing key liquidity concerns," said Oleg
Markin, Moody's AVP-Analyst. "However, KLD's current capital
structure remains unsustainable and will need to be addressed in
2020," added Markin.

Moody's upgraded the ratings on the existing first lien senior
secured credit facility to B2 from B3 to reflect the greater
support and loss absorption provided by the subordinated debt under
Moody's Loss Given Default (LGD) methodology. With $200 million of
new convertible debt raised, which replaced $125 million of senior
secured second lien debt, KLD has meaningfully increased the
proportion of unsecured debt to secured debt in the capital
structure.

Confirmations:

Issuer: LD Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, at Caa1

  Probability of Default Rating, at Caa1-PD

Upgrade:

Issuer: LD Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

  Senior Secured First Lien Bank Credit Facility, upgraded to
  B2 (LGD2) from B3 (LGD3)

Assignments:

Issuer: LD Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

  Speculate Grade Liquidity Rating at SGL-3

Outlook Action:

Issuer: LD Intermediate Holdings, Inc.

  Outlook, Change to stable from Rating Under Review

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Caa1 CFR reflects KLD's high debt-to-EBITDA leverage, estimated
at around 7.8x as of December 31, 2019 (Moody's adjusted and
expensing all capitalized software development costs), modest size
with operations in a mature eDiscovery market that is intensely
competitive. The largely transactional nature of the company's
business model creates short-term earnings and working capital
volatility that limits visibility. The SPAC transaction moderately
increased KLD's debt levels but substantially improved its
liquidity position by freeing up revolver capacity and shoring up
balance sheet cash. The new capital structure, though still
considered unsustainable, will provide the company with incremental
cash flow and liquidity to continue to reinvest in the business and
execute its turnaround plan, a critically important initiative as
KLD faces debt maturities in December 2021-2022. Moody's expects
that with an improved balance sheet and expectation for moderate
EBITDA growth and debt repayment, KLD will deleverage to below 7.0x
over the next 12-18 months. The rating also favorably considers
KLD's credible market position with global scale and breadth of
service offerings, as well as its proprietary technology stack.
Moody's expects the company will maintain adequate liquidity over
the next 12-18 months and will actively pursue refinancing plans
well in advance of debt maturities.

As consequence of the company's access to sensitive client data and
the damage from potential cyberattacks and data breaches, social
risks are noteworthy. Though the company continues to be majority
sponsor-controlled, financial policy is expected to become more
conservative and transparent under public company ownership.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that KLD will
generate modestly positive free cash flow, grow its topline and
maintain stable margin over the next 12-18 months. The outlook also
assumes the company will make progress in addressing its capital
structure in advance of the 2021-2022 debt maturities.

KLD's SGL-3 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating reflects Moody's
expectation that KLD will have adequate liquidity over the next
12-18 months. Sources of liquidity include balance sheet cash of
$43 million at December 31, 2019, Moody's expectation for annual
free cash flow of approximately $15-20 million, along with full
availability under a $30 million revolver expiring in December
2021. Cash on hand and expected free cash flow provide adequate
coverage for required annual term loan amortization of
approximately $17 million, paid quarterly. The revolver has a
springing first lien net leverage covenant when the revolver is
drawn greater than 30% ($9 million), while the term loan does not
have a financial covenant. Moody's does not expect a covenant test
to apply over the next 12-18 months.

Moody's would consider an upgrade if the company puts in place a
more tenable capital structure, demonstrates sustained growth in
revenue and earnings, sustains debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted and
expensing all capitalized software costs) below 7.5x and maintains
at least adequate liquidity.

Moody's would consider a downgrade if revenue or earnings decline,
leading to a deterioration in the company's liquidity, including
sustained negative free cash flow. Ratings could also be pressured
if the company is unable to address its 2021-2022 debt maturities.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

McLean, VA-based KLD provides electronic-discovery services to
corporations and law firms. The company generated more than $300
million in annual revenue in 2019. Following the reverse IPO merger
with Pivotal in December 2019, KLD is a publicly traded company on
OTC market under the symbol "KLDI." The Carlyle Group LP and
Revolution Growth are the majority shareholders of the combined
company.


LIZZA EQUIPMENT: Has Until May 1 to File Plan & Disclosure
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey held a
hearing on the application of Debtors Lizza Equipment Leasing,
Inc., Azzil Granite Materials, LLC and Magnolia Associates, LLC
seeking an extension of the deadline for the Debtor to file a Plan
and Disclosure Statement.

On Feb. 13, 2020, Judge Michael B. Kaplan ordered that:

  * The deadline for the jointly administered Debtors to file a
Plan and Disclosure Statement be and is hereby extended from March
12, 2020, to May 1, 2020.

  * If the Debtors fail to file a Plan and Disclosure Statement by
May 1, 2020, the cases will automatically convert to cases under
Chapter 7.

A full-text copy of the order dated February 13, 2020, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/rhcr6vm from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtors are represented by:

        WASSERMAN, JURISTA & STOLZ, P.C.
        110 Allen Road, Suite 304
        Basking Ridge, NJ 07920
        Tel: (973) 467-2700
        Fax: (973) 467-8126
        Daniel M. Stolz, Esq.

                About Lizza Equipment Leasing

Based in Hackettstown, N.J., Lizza Equipment Leasing, LLC and its
affiliates, Azzil Granite Materials LLC and Magnolia Associates
LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case
No.19-21763) on June 12, 2019. In the petitions signed by Carl J.
Lizza, co-managing member, Lizza Equipment Leasing disclosed $90 in
assets and liabilities of $987,830; Azzil Granite Materials
disclosed total assets of $813,825 and total liabilities of
$23,859,263; and Magnolia Associates disclosed total assets of
$15,317,480, and total liabilities of $13,137,533.

Judge Michael B. Kaplan oversees the cases.

Daniel M. Stolz, Esq., at Wasserman Jurista & Stolz, P.C., is the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

Azzil Granite Materials is a supplier of high friction granite
aggregates for the New York City and Long Island market. Magnolia
Associates owns a 134-acre property with quarry located in White
Hall, N.Y., which is valued by the company at $15 million.


LUCID ENERGY: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' long-term issuer credit rating
to Lucid Energy Group II Borrower LLC. The issue-level rating on
the first-lien term loan remains 'B', with a '3' recovery rating,
indicating its expectation of meaningful (50% to 70%; rounded
estimate: 60%) recovery in the event of a default.

Lucid continues to build out the Red Hill Complex, adding volume
and processing capacity.  Red Hills IV began operations in November
2019, adding 230 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) of capacity.
S&P expects Red Hills V to come online in the third quarter of 2020
adding an additional 230 mmcf/d of processing capacity. Given the
large expansion projects, S&P expects Lucid's average capital
expenditures in 2019 and 2020 to be between $250 and $300 million.
Lucid's sponsors have contributed equity to fund capital spending,
and the rating agency expects them to continue to do so.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that Lucid will execute the
expansion of its gas-gathering and processing infrastructure in the
cost-competitive Northern Delaware Basin. Under its base-case
scenario, S&P is expecting debt to EBITDA of 5.5x-6.0x in 2020
mainly driven by the improving cash flows from increased throughput
volumes from the recently commissioned Red Hills IV and the rating
agency's expectation that Red Hills V will come online in the third
quarter of 2020.

"We could consider lowering the rating if we expect debt to EBITDA
to be above 6x at year-end 2020, which would likely be due to
lower-than-expected volumes on the system. In addition, if the
company issues incremental debt to finance the expansion projects
or if liquidity deteriorates we could take negative rating action,"
S&P said.

"We could raise the rating if we see an increase in the scale and
scope of the operations via increased throughput volumes on the
system that could come from new contracts or expansion projects.
Improved diversity by commodity-type and geography would also help
improve scale and scope. In addition, we could consider raising the
rating if the company consistently sustains debt to EBITDA below
5x," the rating agency said.


M & H PINE STRAW: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James R. Sacca of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Georgia authorized M & H Pine Straw, Inc. to use cash
collateral on an interim basis.

Newtek Small Business Finance, Inc. asserts a security interest in
certain of the Debtor's personal property. The Debtor asserts that
the amount owed to Newtek is approximately $1.9 million as of the
Petition Date.

Newtek and any other secured creditor, to the extent they hold
valid liens, security interests, or rights of setoff as of the
Petition Date under applicable law, are hereby granted valid and
properly-perfected liens on all property acquired by the Debtor
after the Petition Date that is the same or similar nature, kind,
or character as each party's respective pre-petition collateral, to
the extent of any diminution in the value of the Cash Collateral.
However, no such replacement liens will attach to the proceeds of
any avoidance actions under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code. The
Adequate Protection Liens will be deemed automatically valid and
perfected upon entry of this Order.

                    About M & H Pine Straw

M & H Pine Straw, Inc., a wholesaler of pine straw, filed a
voluntary Chapter 11 petition (BAnkr. N.D. Ga. Case no. 20-20099)
on Jan. 17, 2020. The petition was signed by Harris Maloy, owner.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  William A. Rountree, Esq., at Rountree Leitman &
Klein, LLC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


M M & D HARVESTING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: M M & D Harvesting, Inc.
        385 Roxie Reese Road
        Plymouth, NC 27962

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 28, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of North Carolina

Case No.: 20-00841

Judge: Hon. Joseph N. Callaway

Debtor's Counsel: Trawick H. Stubbs, Jr., Esq.
                  STUBBS & PERDUE, P.A.
                  PO Box 1654
                  New Bern, NC 28563
                  Tel: 252-633-2700
                  E-mail: tstubbs@stubbsperdue.com

Total Assets: $1,473,377

Total Liabilities: $1,458,217

The petition was signed by Robert M. Holcomb, Sr., president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                      https://is.gd/bTGMUM


MAGNOLIA PROPERTIES: Has $325K Offer for Mobile Property
--------------------------------------------------------
Magnolia Properties, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Alabama to authorize the real property located
at 6973 and 6397 Dauphin Island Parkway, Mobile, Alabama for
$325,000.

The Debtor owns the property.  The property is encumbered by a
first mortgage in the amount of $114,535.

A third party unrelated to the Debtor has come forth with an offer
to purchase said property for $325,000, which is greater than all
liens now existing on the property.  Completing the sale would
benefit the Debtor by allowing it to surrender the property without
undergoing a foreclosure and by generating money for the Estate.

The Debtor asks the Court to enter an order permitting it to sell
the property free and clear of all liens, and for such other
further relief as the Court deems proper.

                   About Magnolia Properties

Magnolia Properties filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D. Ala. Case No. 19-14180) on November 27, 2019, and is
represented by Judson E Crump, Esq., at Judson E Crump, P.C.  The
Debtor estimated under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.


MAJUANNA WALKER: Selling Plant City Property
--------------------------------------------
Majuanna Walker asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to authorize the sale of her property located
at 1301 W. Bates St., Plant City, Florida.

On January 2020, the Debtor contracted a title company to
facilitate the sale of her property.  Notwithstanding the
provisions set forth under 11 U.S.C. Section 1141(b), the title
company has requested an order of the Court authorizing the sale of
the property.

A copy of the title company's email containing the request letter
is available at https://tinyurl.com/tsobwe4 from PacerMonitor.com
free of charge.

The Debtor respectfully asks that the Court enters an Order
granting her Motion, authorizing the sale of her real property, and
granting such other and further relief as the Court deems
appropriate.

Counsel for Debtor:

         Stanley J. Galewski, Esq.
         GALEWSKI LAW GROUP, P.A.
         412 E Madison St. #1106
         Tampa, FL 33602
         Telephone: (813) 222—8210
         Facsimile: (813) 222-8211
         E-mail: Stan@galewski.com

Majuanna Walker sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case
No. 11-01238) on Jan. 26, 2011.  The Debtor's Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization was confirmed on Oct. 18, 2013.



MEDNAX INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on neonatal, anesthesia and
radiology services provider MEDNAX Inc. to negative from stable and
affirmed its 'BB' issuer credit rating.

The outlook revision follows UnitedHealthcare Inc.'s termination of
all of the contracts of affiliated practices across four states
covering all of the services MEDNAX physicians provide in those
states, including anesthesia, neonatology, and maternal fetal
medicine. Per MEDNAX, UnitedHealthcare is seeking a 50% reduction
in the rates the practices are paid for their services.

The outlook revision reflects the risk that MEDNAX could experience
greater-than-expected EBITDA pressure from other adverse contract
outcomes if United terminates more contracts than it has announced.
The risk includes the possibility of similar actions by other
insurers. As of Feb. 20, MEDNAX announced that United will pursue a
50% rate reduction for all services MEDNAX physicians provide in
the four states in which UnitedHealthcare has terminated its
contracts. While S&P expects the dispute to end with contract
negotiations and at least some margin contraction, it sees risk to
this base case and the possibility that United could expand the
terminations nationally.

The negative outlook reflects the elevated uncertainly regarding
the severity of EBITDA loss if United expands the terminations
nationally and pursues aggressive reductions in the rates of all
services, including neonatology and maternal fetal medicine. While
S&P views this as unlikely, such actions on the part of United
could cause leverage to increase above 4x for an extended period.

"We could consider a lower rating if we expect leverage to be
sustained above 4x, most likely due to United pursuing aggressive
rate reductions in all MEDNAX services nationwide or due to
restructuring costs being materially greater and lasting longer
than expected. If we believe these cuts will be extended nationwide
or if we see other payors following suit with this level of
aggression, we could lower the rating by more than one notch, given
that this would likely cause us to reassess the strength of the
company's business positioning," S&P said.

"We could revise the outlook back to stable if we expect that the
company will sustain debt to EBITDA below 4x. Under this scenario,
we would need to believe the company could absorb EBITDA pressure
from the downside risk of the UnitedHealthcare contract
renegotiations," the rating agency said.


MELINTA THERAPEUTICS: Unsecureds to Get Recovery in Revised Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc., and certain of its affiliates filed an
Amended Disclosure Statement explaining its Chapter 11 plan,
disclosing that holders of general unsecured claims will receive
distributions form a general unsecured claims trust.  The prior
iteration of the disclosure statement said that general unsecured
claimants will have no recovery.

The Plan provides for payment in full or other treatment that would
result in the unimpairment of Allowed Administrative, Priority Tax,
Other Priority Claims, and Other Secured Claims.  The treatment of
the remaining Claims against and Interests in the Debtors depends
on the outcome Debtors' sales and marketing process.  In the event
that the Supporting Lenders are the Successful Bidder, then the
Supporting Lenders shall receive 100% of the equity interests in
reorganized Melinta Therapeutics in full satisfaction of the
Secured Prepetition Credit Agreement Claims, Holders of Allowed
General Unsecured Claims will receive their Pro Rata Share of any
cash distributions from a general unsecured claims trust to be
established under the Plan (the "GUC Trust"), and all Interests in
Melinta Therapeutics shall be cancelled, extinguished, and
discharged.  In the event that a third party is the Successful
Bidder, Holders of Allowed Secured Prepetition Credit Agreement
Claims will receive their pro rata share Pro Rata Share of the
Distributable Cash, until such claims are paid in full in cash,
Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims shall receive their Pro
Rata Share of Distributable Cash, if any, remaining after all
Secured Prepetition Credit Agreement Claims have been paid in full
in cash, and all Interests in Melinta Therapeutics shall be
cancelled, extinguished, and discharged.

Secured Prepetition Credit Agreement Claims totaling $142,426,658
have a projected recovery for 98 percent.

On Feb. 7, 2020, the Debtors, the Committee, Vatera, the Supporting
Lenders, and MedCo (collectively, the "Settlement Parties")
accepted and agreed to a settlement (the "Settlement"),
memorialized in that certain Global Settlement Term Sheet dated as
of the same date (the "Global Settlement Term Sheet").

Pursuant to the Plan and the Global Settlement Term Sheet, in the
event that the Supporting Lenders are the Successful Bidder at the
Auction, on the effective date of the Supporting Lender Transaction
(the "Supporting Lender Transaction Effective Date"), if
applicable, the Debtors will establish the GUC Trust, which will be
funded with $3.5 million (the "Initial GUC Trust Funding Amount")
and will receive certain Avoidance Actions and commercial tort
claims.  The GUC Trust will be administered by a trustee (the "GUC
Trustee") and overseen by a committee comprised of three members of
the Committee (the "GUC Trust Oversight Committee").  In the event
that the Supporting Lenders are the Successful Bidder at the
Auction, Holders of Allowed Class 4 General Unsecured Claims will
receive their Pro Rata Share of any distributions or recoveries
from the GUC Trust, except that Vatera and MedCo have agreed to
subordinate their Claims to those of other Holders of General
Unsecured Claims with respect to the first $3.5 million distributed
by the GUC Trust.

The Global Settlement Term Sheet requires that the Investigator
identify any colorable claim that will be transferred to the GUC
Trust by no later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern) on March 12, 2020.  In
the event that the Investigator determines that a colorable claim
against any of the
D&Os, the Vatera Persons, or the MedCo Persons exists and will be
transferred to the GUC Trust, such persons will not be released
under the Plan, and the Debtors will amend the Plan accordingly.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement dated February
19, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/rknoswk from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel for the Debtors:

     Joseph O. Larkin (I.D. No. 4883)
     Jason M. Liberi (I.D. No. 4425)
     SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,
     MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
     920 North King Street
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Telephone: (302) 651-3000
     Fax: (302) 651-3001

            – and –

     Ron E. Meisler
     Albert L. Hogan III
     Christopher M. Dressel
     155 North Wacker Drive
     Chicago, Illinois 60606-1720
     Telephone: (312) 407-0700
     Fax: (312) 407-0411

     David R. Hurst
     MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY
     The Nemours Building
     1007 North Orange Street, 4th Floor
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Telephone: (302) 485-3900
     Fax: (302) 351-8711

                   About Melinta Therapeutics

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: MLNT) --
http://www.melinta.com/-- is the largest pure-play antibiotics
company, dedicated to saving lives threatened by the global public
health crisis of bacterial infections through the development and
commercialization of novel antibiotics that provide new therapeutic
solutions.  Its four marketed products include Baxdela
(delafloxacin), Vabomere (meropenem and vaborbactam), Orbactiv
(oritavancin), and Minocin (minocycline) for Injection.  This
portfolio provides Melinta with the unique ability to provide
providers and patients with a range of solutions that can meet the
tremendous need for novel antibiotics treating serious infections.

Melinta Therapeutics, Inc., and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12748) on Dec. 27, 2019, after
reaching a deal with lenders on a Chapter 11 plan that would
convert debt to equity.

Melinta Therapeutics disclosed $228,491,000 in assets and
$289,022,000 in liabilities as of Sept. 30, 2019.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the presiding judge.

Melinta tapped Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
bankruptcy counsel.  Cole Scholtz LLP is co-counsel.  Jefferies,
LLC, is the investment banker; and Portage Point Partners, LLC, is
the financial advisor.

Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the claims agent, maintaining
the page http://www.kccllc.net/melinta    

The Supporting Lenders are advised by Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
Houlihan Lokey and Landis Rath & Cobb LLP.


MESA MARKETPLACE: Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------
Mesa Marketplace Center, LLC asked the Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Arizona to use cash collateral until final hearing on
the motion.  The Debtor will use the cash collateral to pay
ordinary and necessary expenses of operating and maintaining its
business.  The budget provided for $20,658 in total expenses,
including $4,600 in property tax and $7,000 of management
compensation, among others.

The Debtor listed approximately $3,865,000 in debts, as follows:
(i) $3,530,000 to SMS Financial Strategic Investments, LLC (first
lien), (ii) $85,000 to Pacific Global Bank (second, third and
fourth lien), and (iii) $250,000 to Maricopa County for property
taxes.

The Debtor proposes to provide adequate protection to creditors by
way of stipulation.  Debtor will also make monthly accountings to
the creditors and grant creditors the right to inspect the Debtors'
records upon reasonable notice and conditions.

A copy of the motion is available for free at https://is.gd/5riH1j
from PacerMonitor.com.

In a separate document previously filed in Court, SMS Financial
expressed its non-consent to the Debtor's use of cash collateral,
demanding segregation of its cash collateral and seeking adequate
protection for its interest to the extent the Debtor desires to use
SMS cash collateral.  A copy of the notice of non-consent is
available at  https://is.gd/uVrTnt from PacerMonitor.com free of
charge.

                About Mesa Marketplace Center

Mesa Marketplace Center is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The Debtor previously
sought bankruptcy protection on Aug. 31, 2016 (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case
No. 16-10094).  

The Debtor again filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case
No. 20-01335) on Feb. 10, 2020.  On the Petition Date, the Debtor
estimated between $1 million and $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The petition was signed by Kenny Eng, member.  James
Portman Webster Law Office, PLC is the Debtor's counsel.


MODERN RADIOLOGY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Modern Radiology PSC
           dba Bermudez Imaging, PSC
           dba Bermudez Ruiz Imaging, PSC
           dba G Bermudez Diagnostic, PSC
           dba Gamshar Images Services
        9176 C Marina
        Ponce, PR 00717

Business Description: Modern Radiology PSC owns and operates a
                      medical and diagnostic laboratory in Puerto
                      Rico.  The company previously sought
                      bankruptcy protection on May 18, 2015
                      (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 15-03629).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 28, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico

Case No.: 20-01107

Debtor's Counsel: Nilda Gonzalez Cordero, Esq.
                  NILDA GONZALEZ CORDERO
                  P.O. Box 3389
                  Guaynabo, PR 00970
                  Tel: 787-721-3437
                  E-mail: ngonzalezc@ngclawpr.com
            
Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Gamalier Bermudez Ruiz, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                    https://is.gd/EaYhTB


MOTHERS TOUCH: Court Confirms Reorganization Plan
-------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 12, 2020, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Missouri convened a hearing to consider confirmation of
the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement, dated December 16,
2019, proposed by Debtor Mothers Touch Learning Center Scenic LLC.

On Feb. 13, 2020, Judge Cynthia A. Norton confirmed the Combined
Plan and Disclosure Statement with the incorporation of the
following changes:

  * The last sentence in Section IX, Paragraph K (on page 13 of the
plan) will be changed to read "The final Plan payment is expected
to be paid on April 2023".

  * Section III, Paragraph D 2 (on page 6 of the plan) shall be
changed.

The Court finds the corrections should not adversely affect the
holders of any Class of claims or interest or the feasibility of
the Plan and additional notice of or disclosure relating to such
modifications or clerical corrections are unnecessary.  

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/svelfbm from PacerMonitor at no charge.

          About Mother's Touch Learning Center Scenic

Mother's Touch Learning Center Scenic, LLC, is a limited liability
company in good standing with the State of Missouri.  It has been
in the business of child daycare since its inception in 2001.

At that point the Debtor had incurred considerable tax debt, so the
Debtor hired an attorney in November 2017 for the purposes of
working out a payment plan with the Internal Revenue Service.
However, the attorney has not been of any assistance in the matter
and therefore the tax debt has not been resolved and has only
gotten larger, thus leading the Debtor to file this Chapter 11
bankruptcy.

Mothers Touch Learning Center Scenic LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 19-60709) on June 19, 2019.

The Debtor is represented by Douglas, Haun & Heidemann, P.C.


MTE HOLDINGS: Potter Anderson 3rd Update on Service Providers
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of MTE Holdings LLC, et al., the law firm
of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP submitted a third amended verified
statement under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure, to provide an updated list of the Ad Hoc Committee of
Service Providers that it is representing.

On Oct. 22, 2019, Oct. 23, 2019, and Nov. 8, 2019, each of the
Debtors filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of
title 11 of the United States Code.

On Nov. 20, 2019, the Office of the United States Trustee held a
meeting to form an official committee of unsecured creditors.  The
U.S. Trustee did not appoint an official committee of unsecured
creditors at the meeting, and on Dec. 3, 2019, the U.S. Trustee
filed the Statement that a Committee of Unsecured Creditors Has Not
Been Appointed [Docket No. 164].

Many of the creditors comprising the Ad Hoc Committee submitted
questionnaires to the U.S. Trustee and appeared at the Formation
Meeting; however, many, if not all, of these creditors have
statutory liens pursuant to Chapter 56 of Title 5 of the Texas
Property Code.  See generally Tex. Prop. Code Ann. Section 56 et
seq.  Following the Formation Meeting, the creditors that make up
the Ad Hoc Committee organized as a group to protect and preserve
their rights and the rights of similarly situated creditors in
these cases [Docket No. 160].  The Ad Hoc Committee consists of
parties who performed labor or provided services to, or furnished
or hauled material, machinery, or supplies used in, the Debtors'
mineral activities.

As of Feb. 27, 2020, members of the Ad Hoc Group and their
disclosable economic interests are:

                                          Materialmen's Lien
                                          ------------------

Alamo Pressure Pumping, LLC
1101 N. Little School Road
Arlington, TX 76017                        $19,517,624.27

Anchor Drilling Fluids USA
11700 Katy Freeway, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77079                          $1,422,536.24

Apergy ESP Systems, LLC
2445 Technology Forest Blvd.
Building 4, 12th Floor
The Woodlands, TX 77381                    $4,851,753.78

Baseline Energy Services, LP
201 Foch Street
Fort Worth, TX 76107                       $1,226,077.16

Basic Energy Services, LP
801 Cherry Street, Suite 2100
Fort Worth, TX 76102                       $3,217,315.85

Covenant Testing Technologies, LLC
1600 Highway 6, Suite 360
Sugar Land, TX 77478                        $809,630.8

DuraChem Services
2719 W County Road 114
Midland, TX 79706                         $4,474,085.56

Eastham Drilling, Inc.
d/b/a Big E Drilling
4710 Bellaire Blvd., Suite 350
Bellaire, TX 77401                         $8,861,682.00

FESCO, Ltd.
1000 FESCO Ave.
Alice, TX 78332                            $1,586,814.77

Flowco Production Solutions, LLC
18511 Imperial Valley Dr.
Houston, TX 77073                            $601,186.06

Gravity Oilfield Services, LLC
3300 North A Street
Building 4, Suite 100
Midland, TX 79705                          $11,037,156.80

JW Powerline, LLC
2401 E. Interstate 20
Midland, TX 79701                           $5,820,435.78

Knight Energy Services, LLC
19500 State Highway 249, Suite 600
Houston, TX 77070                             $156,395.04

Legacy Directional Drilling, LLC
103 Abigayles Row
Scott, LA 70583                             $5,200,891.18

NCS Multistage, LLC
19450 State Highway 249, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77070                             $174,494.52

Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC
10713 W. Sam Houston Pkwy. North
Suite 800
Houston, TX 77064                           $3,958,564.33

Peak Oilfield Services, LLC
P.O. Box 548
Birdgeport, TX 76426                          $928,797.42

ProPetro Services, Inc.
1706 S. Midkiff Building B
Midland, TX 79701                             $850,377.42

RWLS d/b/a Renegade Services
1937 West Avenue (PO Box 862)
Levelland, TX 79336                         $3,330,708.55

Select Energy Services, LLC
1233 West Loop South
Suite 1400
Houston, TX 77027                           $1,674,758.47

Sidewinder Drilling LLC
20475 Highway 249, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77070                             $501,662.25

STEP Energy Services Holdings Ltd.
480 Wildwood Forest Drive
Suite 300
Spring, TX 77380                            $3,784,145.08

Superior Energy/
Pumpco Energy Services
1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 2900
Houston, TX 77002                           $2,105,252.11

Trio Equipment Co.
3683 E Highway 44
Alice, TX 78332                               $812,540.30

WaterBridge Texas Midstream LLC
Attn: General Counsel
840 Gessner Road, Suite 100
Houston, TX 77024                           $7,449,987.00

Nothing contained in this Verified Statement should be construed as
a limitation upon, or waiver of any Ad Hoc Committee member's
rights to assert, file and/or amend its claim(s) in accordance with
applicable law and any orders entered in these cases establishing
procedures for filing proofs of claim.

The Ad Hoc Committee reserves the right to amend or supplement this
Verified Statement in accordance with the requirements set forth in
Bankruptcy Rule 2019.

Counsel to the Ad Hoc Committee of Service Providers can be reached
at:

          POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
          Christopher M. Samis, Esq.
          L. Katherine Good, Esq.
          R. Stephen McNeill, Esq.
          Aaron H. Stulman, Esq.
          1313 North Market Street, Sixth Floor
          P.O. Box 951
          Wilmington, DE 19899
          Telephone: (302) 984-6000
          Facsimile: (302) 658-1192
          E-mail: csamis@potteranderson.com
                  kgood@potteranderson.com
                  rmcneill@potteranderson.com
                  astulman@potteranderson.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/XYf7vR and https://is.gd/k4K1yQ

                    About MTE Holdings LLC

MTE Holdings LLC is a privately held company in the oil and gas
extraction business. MTE sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 19-12269) on Oct. 22,
2019.  In the petition signed by its authorized representative,
Mark A. Siffin, the Debtor disclosed debts of less than $500
million.  Judge Karen B. Owens has been assigned to the case.  The
Debtor tapped Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP as its bankruptcy counsel;
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, LLP as its local counsel; and
Stretto as its claims and noticing agent.


MURRAY ENERGY: Bailey, Steptoe, and Mooney Represent Benefit Fund
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
the law firm of Bailey Cavalieri LLC, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, and
Mooney, Green, Saindon, Murphy & Welch, P.C. submitted a verified
statement to disclose that they are representing UMWA 1974 Pension
Plan, UMWA 1992 Benefit Plan, UMWA 1993 Benefit Plan, and UMWA Cash
Deferred Savings Plan in the Chapter 11 cases of Murray Energy
Holdings Co.

The Firms represent only the Creditors in the Chapter 11 Case.

As of Feb. 27, 2020, each Creditor's and their disclosable economic
interests are:

UMWA 1974 Pension Plan
United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds
2121 K Street NW, 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20037

* All obligations of any or all of the Debtors arising under or in
connection with the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan, including any
withdrawal liability, or the National Bituminous Coal Wage
Agreements.

* Amount of Claim or Interest: $5.7 billion

UMWA 1992 Benefit Plan
United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds
2121 K Street NW, 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20037

* All obligations of any or all of the Debtors arising under or in
connection with the UMWA 1992 Benefit Plan.

* Amount of Claim or Interest: undetermined

UMWA 1993 Benefit Plan
United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds
2121 K Street NW, 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20037

* All obligations of any or all of the Debtors arising under or in
connection with the UMWA 1993 Benefit Plan, Participation
Agreement, or National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreements

* Amount of Claim or Interest: undetermined

UMWA Cash Deferred Savings Plan
United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement Funds
2121 K Street NW, 5th Floor
Washington, DC 20037

* All obligations of any or all of the Debtors arising under or in
connection with the UMWA Cash Deferred Savings Plan.

* Amount of Claim or Interest: undetermined

Nothing contained in this Verified Statement is intended or shall
be construed to constitute (i) a waiver or release of the rights of
any of the Creditors to have any final order entered by, or other
exercise of the judicial power of the United States performed by,
an Article III court; (ii) a waiver or release of the rights of any
of the Creditors to have any and all final orders in any and all
non-core matters entered only after de novo review by a United
States District Judge; (iii) consent to the jurisdiction of the
Court over any matter; (iv) an election of remedy; (v) a waiver or
release of any rights any of the Creditors may have to a jury
trial; (vi) a waiver or release of the right to move to withdraw
the reference with respect to any matter or proceeding that may be
commenced in the Chapter 11 Case against or otherwise involving any
of the Creditors; or (vii) a waiver or release of any other rights,
claims, actions, defenses, setoffs or recoupments to which any of
the Creditors may be entitled, in law or in equity, under any
agreement or otherwise, with all of which rights, claims, actions,
defenses, setoffs or recoupments being expressly reserved.

Counsel for the Creditors can be reached at:

          Bailey Cavalieri LLC
          Nick V. Cavalieri, Esq.
          Matthew T. Schaeffer, Esq.
          10 W. Broad Street, Suite 2100
          Columbus, OH 43215-3422
          Tel: (614) 229-3252
          Fax: (614) 221-0479
          E-mail: nick.cavalieri@baileycavalieri.com
                  matthew.schaeffer@baileycavalieri.com

          Steptoe & Johnson LLP
          Filiberto Agusti, Esq.
          1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
          Washington, DC 20036
          Tel: (202) 429-6428
          Fax: (202) 429-3902
          E-Mail: fagusti@steptoe.com

                 - and -

          MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, P.C.
          Paul A. Green, Esq.
          John R. Mooney, Esq.
          Diana M. Bardes, Esq.
          1920 L Street, N.W., Suite 400
          Washington, D.C. 20036
          Telephone: (202) 783-0010
          E-mail: pgreen@mooneygreen.com
                  jmooney@mooneygreen.com
                  dbardes@mooneygreen.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/DTEMes

                    About Murray Energy

Headquartered in St. Clairsville, Ohio, Murray Energy --
http://murrayenergycorp.com/-- is the largest privately owned coal
company in the United States, producing approximately 76 million
tons of high quality bituminous coal each year, and employing
nearly 7,000 people in the United States, Colombia and South
America.

Murray Energy now operates 15 active mines in five regions in the
United States, plus two mines in Colombia, South America.  It
operates 12 underground longwall mining systems, 42 continuous
mining units, 10 transloading facilities, and five mining equipment
factory and fabrication facilities.

Murray Energy and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Lead Case No. 19-56885)
on
Oct. 29, 2019.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed assets of between
$1 billion and $10 billion and liabilities of the same range.

The cases have been assigned to Judge John E. Hoffman Jr.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP as general bankruptcy counsel; Dinsmore & Shohl
LLP as local counsel; Evercore Group L.L.C. as investment banker;
Alvarez and Marsal L.L.C. as financial advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC
as notice and claims agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 appointed creditors to serve on the
official committee of unsecured creditors on Nov. 7, 2019.


NANOMECH INC: Delays Filing of Plan to Pursue Avoidance Actions
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware extended the
exclusive period for Nanomech, Inc. to file a Chapter 11 plan and
solicit acceptances for the plan to May 11 and July 8,
respectively.

The extension will allow Nanomech to pursue preferential and
avoidance actions, which are the only assets remaining following
the sale of most of the company's assets.  The company is still
investigating such claims.   

                     About Nanomech Inc.

NanoMech, Inc. is a privately held company focused on patented
platform nanomanufacturing technologies. It was formed in 2002.  

NanoMech filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 19-10851) on April 15, 2019.  In the petition signed by
Benjamin Waisbren, chief restructuring officer, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Judge Christopher S. Sontchi oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped Winston & Strawn LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown, LLC as bankruptcy
co-counsel; and Virtually There LLC as restructuring advisor.


NEPHROS INC: Incurs $3.18 Million Net Loss in 2019
--------------------------------------------------
Nephros, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its Annual Report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of $3.18
million on $10.33 million of total net revenues for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $3.33 million on $5.69
million of total net revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.

"We are pleased the 2019's results continued the Company's
consistent multi-year growth trajectory and steady improvement of
the bottom line," said Daron Evans, president and chief executive
officer of Nephros.  "As we look forward into 2020, we are well
capitalized and believe we are well positioned to maintain the
momentum we have generated.  We expect to grow revenues between 40%
and 50%, with additional revenue growth possible depending on the
timing and growth trajectory of our pathogen detection system
products.  We look forward to building on our foundation of
engineering and customer service excellence into an exciting
2020."

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $11.63 million in total
assets, $3.94 million in total liabilities, and $7.69 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Cost of goods sold for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019 was $4.3
million, compared with $2.5 million in 2018, an increase of 71%.

Gross margins for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019 were 59%, compared
with 56% in 2018.

Research and development expenses for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019
were $3.1 million, compared with $1.5 million in 2018, an increase
of 101%.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019 were approximately $186,000, compared with
approximately $163,000 in 2018, an increase of 14%.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019 were $6.1 million, compared with $4.5 million in
2018, an increase of 35%.

Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2019 was ($1.2
million), compared with ($1.8 million) in 2018, a 30% reduction.

The Company has sustained operating losses and expects such losses
to continue over the next several quarters.  In addition, net cash
from operations has been negative since inception, generating an
accumulated deficit of approximately $127,332,000 as of Dec. 31,
2019.  On Feb. 4, 2020, the Company completed a confidentially
marketed underwritten public offering whereby the Company sold
937,500 shares of its common stock for aggregate net proceeds of
approximately $6,765,000.  The Company also has a loan agreement
with a lender, which provides a secured asset-based revolving
credit facility.  This loan agreement was amended on Dec. 20, 2019
to increase the borrowing capacity from $1,000,000 to $2,500,000.

In July 2018, the Company formed a new subsidiary, Specialty Renal
Products, Inc. ("SRP"), to drive the development of its
second-generation HDF system and other products focused on
improving therapies for patients with renal disease.  On Sept. 5,
2018, SRP completed a private placement transaction whereby SRP
sold preferred shares equivalent to 37.5% of its outstanding equity
interests for aggregate proceeds of $3,000,000.  As of the date of
issuance of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, SRP
has approximately $539,000 in cash.  The proceeds of this private
placement are restricted to SRP expenses and may not be used for
the benefit of the Company or other affiliated entities, except to
reimburse for expenses directly attributable to SRP.

Nephros said, "Based on cash that is available for Company
operations and projections of future Company operations, the
Company believes that its cash will be sufficient to fund the
Company's current operating plan through at least the next 12
months from the date of issuance of the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.  Additionally, management's operating plans
are designed to help control operating costs, to increase revenue
and to raise additional capital until such time as the Company
generates sufficient cash flows from operations.  If there were a
decrease in the demand for the Company's products due to either
economic or competitive conditions, or management were unable to
achieve its plan, there could be a significant reduction in
liquidity due to the possible inability of the Company to cut costs
sufficiently."

              Financial Performance for the Fourth Quarter

Net revenues for the fourth quarter of 2019 were $3.2 million,
compared with $1.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2018, an
increase of 96%.

Cost of goods sold for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $1.3 million,
compared with $0.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2018, an
increase of 92%.

Gross margins for the fourth quarter of 2019 were 60%, compared
with 59% in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Research and development expenses for the fourth quarter of 2019
were $0.8 million, compared with $0.5 million in the fourth quarter
of 2018, an increase of 40%.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the fourth quarter of
2019 were approximately $44,000, compared with approximately
$40,000 in the fourth quarter of 2018, an increase of 10%.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the fourth quarter
of 2019 were $1.4 million, compared with $1.1 million in 2018, an
increase of 30%.

Net (loss) for the fourth quarter of 2019 was approximately
($143,000), compared with a net (loss) of approximately ($664,000)
in the fourth quarter of 2018, a 78% reduction.

Adjusted EBITDA for the fourth quarter 2019 was approximately
$377,000, compared with approximately ($256,000) in the fourth
quarter of 2018.

As of December 31, 2019, Nephros had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $4.2 million.  In January 2020, Nephros completed a
Common Stock offering which generated approximately $6.7 million of
net cash proceeds.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/uAqKzR

                        About Nephros Inc.

River Edge, N.J.-based Nephros, Inc., is a commercial stage medical
device company that develops and sells high performance liquid
purification filters.  Its filters, which are generally classified
as ultrafilters, are primarily used in hospitals for the prevention
of infection from water-borne pathogens, such as legionella and
pseudomonas, and in dialysis centers for the removal of biological
contaminants from water and bicarbonate concentrate.


NEW ENERGY: Needs More Time to Complete Plan Negotiations
---------------------------------------------------------
New Energy Consultants & Contractors LLC has until March 31 to file
its Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and disclosure statement.

NECC sought exclusivity extension to allow conclusion of its
ongoing negotiations with Parliament High Yield Fund, LLC, Sunrun,
AEE Solar, ALC Warehouses, LLC and members of the company for a
substantial capital investment.  The result of such negotiations
will be instrumental to the plan to be filed.  NECC is confident
that it can conclude the negotiations and be able to file a
disclosure statement and plan by March 31.

                About New Energy Consultants

New Energy Consultants & Contractors LLC is a Puerto Rican company
with a mission to serve residential and commercial renewable energy
markets.

New Energy Consultants filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.P.R.
Case No. 19-05891) on Oct. 10, 2019.  In the petition signed by
Yolanda Gonzalez Gomez, chief financial officer and chief
restructuring officer, the Debtor estimated $50,000 in assets and
$10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  Judge Enrique S.
Lamoutte Inclan oversees the case.

Jose F. Cardona Jimenez, Esq., at Cardona Jimenez Law Offices, PSC,
is the Debtor's legal counsel.


NEW WAY INVESTMENTS: March 26 Plan & Disclosure Hearing Set
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 11, 2020, debtor New Way Investments, L.L.C. filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana,
Alexandria Division, a Disclosure Statement with respect to a Plan
under Chapter 11.

On Feb. 13, 2020, Judge John S. Hodge conditionally approved the
Disclosure Statement and established the following dates and
deadlines:

  * March 19, 2020, is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the plan.

  * March 26, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. is fixed for the hearing on final
approval of the disclosure and for the hearing on confirmation of
the plan. The hearing will be held at 300 Jackson Street, Suite
116, Alexandria, Louisiana, 71301.

  * March 19, 2020, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement and confirmation of
the plan.

  * March 24, 2020, is fixed as the deadline for Debtor to file a
tabulation of ballots accepting or rejecting the plan; and a
declaration or affidavit of compliance.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/rztgt9e from PacerMonitor at no charge.

                   About New Way Investments

New Way Investments LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 19-80785) on Aug. 20,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $50,000.
The case is assigned to Judge Stephen D. Wheelis.  Thomas R.
Willson, Esq., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


NEWBRIDGE ON CHARLES: Fitch Affirm BB+ Rating on $236MM 2017 Bonds
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings affirmed the 'BB+' rating on the $236.29 million
revenue refunding bonds series 2017 issued by the Massachusetts
Development Finance Agency on behalf of NewBridge on the Charles
Inc.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The bonds are secured by a mortgage on the retirement community
facility, a security interest in NewBridge's "collateral" as
defined in the Master Trust Indenture, including gross revenues,
and a debt service reserve account that is partially funded by an
equity contribution from NewBridge's sole corporate member, Hebrew
SeniorLife (HSL).

KEY RATING DRIVERS

STRONG OPERATING PROFILE: NewBridge's parent company and manager is
HSL, a large and reputable senior services enterprise affiliated
with Harvard Medical School, and has a significant presence in the
Boston, MA region. HSL has provided financial support in addition
to its leadership and administrative expertise. Driven by
NewBridge's attractive facilities, favorable location and quality
reputation, demand at all levels of care has been high. Occupancy
also has historically been strong, as evidenced by NewBridge's
97.8% occupancy in independent living units (ILUs), 97.1% in its
assisted living units (ALUs), and 94.8% in its health care center
(HCC), which is comprised of a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and
long-term chronic care.

ELEVATED LONG TERM LIABILITY PROFILE: In fiscal 2019, NewBridge's
debt position remains very high as evidenced by MADS equating to
25.3% revenues and debt to net available measuring 13.0x, which are
weaker than Fitch's non-investment-grade medians.

IMPROVED FINANCIAL PROFILE: Operating profitability and balance
sheet strength have improved. The operating ratio strengthened to
91.8% during fiscal 2019, from 96.6% in fiscal 2015. Furthermore,
fiscal 2019 performance resulted in days cash on hand (DCOH) of 428
days, an improvement from 303 in fiscal 2015. These metrics include
HCC's lease payments, but not its operating expenses. HCC is
operated by NewBridge's affiliate, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center
(HRC), where monthly rental payments are equal to 100% of net
revenues after payment of direct expenses.

ASYMMETRIC ADDITIVE RISK FACTORS: No asymmetric risk considerations
are relevant to the rating.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

The Stable Rating Outlook reflects NewBridge's relatively high debt
burden, which will, in Fitch's opinion, make meaningful reductions
in leverage unlikely over the agency's two-year Outlook.

DEVELOPMENTS THAT MAY, INDIVIDUALLY OR COLLECTIVELY, LEAD TO A
POSITIVE RATING ACTION:

  -- Significant balance sheet improvement could elevate the rating
if debt moderates and the liquidity position continues to improve,
positioning NewBridge's credit metrics in line with Fitch's 'BBB'
category medians of 63.6% cash-to-debt and 8.3x cushion ratio.

DEVELOPMENTS THAT MAY, INDIVIDUALLY OR COLLECTIVELY, LEAD TO A
NEGATIVE RATING ACTION:

  -- Operating profitability or cash flow weakness that
meaningfully deteriorates liquidity or reduces debt service
coverage.

  -- Any unexpected notable reduction in census in NewBridge's ILU,
ALU, SNF or HCC.

CREDIT PROFILE

NewBridge is a life plan community with 256 ILUs, 51 ALUs and 40
memory support units. NewBridge also includes a health care center
with 48 skilled nursing facility (SNF) beds dedicated to short-term
rehabilitative care and 220 long-term chronic care beds. The health
care center is leased by an affiliated entity of HSL, Hebrew
Rehabilitation Center. The lease agreement provides NewBridge
monthly rental payments from HRC that are equal to 100% of net
revenues of the leased space after payment of direct expenses
related to those operations. All facilities are located on an
expansive 162-acre campus in Dedham, MA about 10 miles southwest of
downtown Boston and just north and east of Route 128/I-95.

In fiscal 2019, HSL and its affiliates generated $239.4 million of
operating revenues and held $618 million of total assets. NewBridge
represented 51% of consolidated system assets but only 22% of
consolidated system revenues, equating to $52.9 million. Only
NewBridge is obligated on the series 2017 bonds, and Fitch's
analysis is based solely on the obligated group's financial
statements.

OPERATING PROFILE

NewBridge's sole corporate member and manager is HSL, a prominent
senior services enterprise that is affiliated with Harvard Medical
School and has significant long-term care operations in the Boston
region. Founded in 1903, HSL provides communities and healthcare
for seniors, research into aging, and education for geriatric care
providers. It is one of the largest not-for-profit employers in
Massachusetts and cares for approximately 3,000 seniors at six
Boston-area campuses and communities. Due to its contributions to
the clinical and research missions of Harvard Medical School and
one of its major teaching hospitals, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center, HSL is Harvard's only geriatric affiliate.

Since NewBridge's inception, it's benefitted from significant
capital contributions from HSL. HSL has deferred all incentive and
affiliate management fees (worth $17 million as of Sept. 30, 2017)
since NewBridge opened, but regular management fees based on 4% of
revenues were transferred to HSL. HSL also supplied $6 million of
equity to partially fund the debt service reserve for the Series
2017 bonds. Repayment of HSL's financial commitments are
subordinate to debt service and capital expenditures, where
NewBridge will ensure DCOH exceeds 275 days (assuming HCC's
operating expenses are included) before paying back HSL. Fitch
believes this arrangement will allow operating profitability and
debt service coverage to improve over time.

STRONG OCCUPANCY AND DEMAND

NewBridge's primary market area (PMA) encompasses 26 ZIP codes and
draws from a broad base of residents. Residents come from not only
within Massachusetts, but also from outside the state, indicating
that NewBridge has a favorable reputation for quality care,
attractive facilities and unique service offerings. Another driver
of NewBridge's demand is its HSL affiliation and historical ties to
Jewish-related religious and support organizations. In addition,
the community's waitlist continues to be robust. As of February
2020, NewBridge maintains 165 and 108 prospective residents for the
ILUs and ALUs, respectively.

NewBridge enjoys strong demand at all levels of service. ILU, ALU
and total HCC occupancies averaged 98.0%, 96.2% and 95.8%,
respectively, from fiscal years 2015 through 2019. Occupancy in the
48-bed short-stay rehabilitation center averaged 90.8% from fiscal
years 2015-2017 and 95.9% at the 220-bed long-term chronic care
facility. For the three-month period ended Dec. 31, 2019, ILU
(97%), ALU (94%) and total HCC (95%) occupancy remained very solid.
Average year-to-date occupancy (through January) of 91.7% for the
rehabilitation center and 96.2% for the chronic care facility
remains strong.

OPERATING PERFORMANCE

The financial analysis and figures cited in this release are for
NewBridge only, and do not include HCC's revenues and expenses.
Fitch also notes that NewBridge's financial ratios are not fully
comparable with similar communities given its relationship and
lease arrangement with HRC. The revenues and expenses of HRC's
operations in the leased space are not reflected in NewBridge's
financial statements, only the earnings related to the operations.
As such, certain operating, capital and liquidity ratios are
somewhat overstated.

Given the assumptions, the NewBridge's financial performance has
steadily improved over time. As a result of NewBridge's strong
occupancy, increased operating efficiency and consistent net
entrance fee receipts, profitability is very solid, with net
operating margin and net operating margin-adjusted averaging 21.3%
and 32.4%, respectively, from fiscal years 2015 to 2019. Both
metrics are well above the Fitch below-investment-grade medians of
3.8% and 19.4%.

In fiscal 2019, NewBridge's maximum annual debt service (MADS)
coverage including turnover entrance fee receipts was 1.4x, and
0.8x on a revenue-only basis, which are on par with Fitch's
non-investment grade category medians of 1.3x and 0.7x,
respectively.

NewBridge's operating cash flow is supported by HCC's lease
payments, averaging approximately $9 million for fiscal years
2016-2019. HCC's operations are supported by a relatively large
private pay business (about 35% of net patient service revenues)
and strong history of contracts with MassHealth for residents with
Medicaid. In fact, HRC's most recent MassHealth contract resulted
in a per diem rate increase of about 1.75%, which is very solid
relative to the broader market. Furthermore, HCC's overall
reputation and relationship with MassHealth continue to thrive as
it maintains strong quality of care measures.

SUFFICIENT LIQUIDITY

NewBridge's balance sheet is characterized by a very heavy debt
position but strengthening liquidity balance. In fiscal 2019,
unrestricted liquidity grew by 6.4% to a total of $53.8 million,
which translates to 428 DCOH and 22.3% cash-to-debt. Because of
NewBridge's debt load, these results were mixed compared to Fitch's
non-investment grade medians of 312 DCOH and 33.0%, respectively.
Fitch believes NewBridge's liquidity balance will continue to grow
given strong operations, consistent net entrance fee receipts and
moderate capital spending.

Fitch notes that the DCOH ratio is overstated given the structure
of the lease agreement with HRC, whereby HCC's operating revenues
and expenses are not incorporated into NewBridge's financial
statements. While Fitch expects liquidity to grow due to operating
performance, its upward trend may be somewhat limited by repayment
of deferred fees to HSL in the future.

ESG Considerations

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.


NOVAN INC: Sabby Volatility, et al. Have 7.5% Stake as of Feb. 28
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd., Sabby Management, LLC,
and Hal Mintz disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission that as of Feb. 28, 2020 they beneficially
own 3,333,333 shares of common stock of Novan, Inc., which
represents 7.54 percent of the shares outstanding.  A full-text
copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/SvbW0b

                          About Novan Inc.

Based in Morrisville, North Carolina, Novan Inc. --
http://www.novan.com-- is a clinical development-stage
biotechnology company focused on leveraging nitric oxide's
naturally occurring anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and
immunomodulatory mechanisms of action to treat a range of diseases
with significant unmet needs.  Nitric oxide plays a vital role in
the natural immune system response against microbial pathogens and
is a critical regulator of inflammation.

Novan reportedg a net loss and comprehensive loss of $30.64 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss and
comprehensive loss of $12.67 million for the year ended Dec. 31,
2018.  As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $29.09 million in total
assets, $52.88 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $23.79 million.

BDO USA, LLP, in Raleigh, North Carolina, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Feb. 24, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has not generated significant revenue or
positive cash flows from operations.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


OBALON THERAPEUTICS: Incurs $23.7 Million Net Loss in 2019
----------------------------------------------------------
Obalon Therapeutics, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K reporting a net loss of
$23.68 million on $3.28 million of total revenue for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $37.38 million on $9.10
million of total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, the Company had $20.39 million in total
assets, $4.54 million in total liabilities, and $15.85 million in
total stockholders' equity.

U.S. revenue of $2.4 million represented 73% of full year 2019
revenue, decreasing from $4.7 million or 52% of full year 2018
revenue.  International revenue of $0.9 million in 2019 equated to
27% of full year 2019 revenue as compared to $4.4 million of
international revenue in 2018 which equated to 48% of full year
2018 revenue.

Gross profit for the full year 2019 was $0.3 million, resulting in
a gross margin of 10%, as compared to $3.7 million for the full
year 2018 and a gross margin of 40%.

Research and development expense totaled $6.9 million for the full
year 2019, as compared to $10.7 million for the full year 2018.
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $16.7
million for the full year 2019, as compared to $29.9 million for
the full year 2018.

Operating loss for the full year 2019 was $23.2 million, compared
to an operating loss of $37.0 million for the full year 2018.

KPMG LLP, in San Diego, California, the Company's auditor since
2015, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
Feb. 27, 2020, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

                   Fourth Quarter 2019 Results

The Company reported revenue of $0.8 million for the fourth quarter
of 2019, compared to $2.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2018.
U.S. revenue of $0.5 million represented 62% of revenue as compared
to $0.8 million and 41% of revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018.
International revenue of $0.3 million represented 38% of revenue in
the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to $1.2 million and 59% of
revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Cost of revenue was $0.6 million during the three months ended Dec.
31, 2019, down from $1.5 million for the prior-year comparable
period. Gross profit for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $0.2
million, resulting in a gross margin of 20%, compared to a gross
profit of $0.5 million and gross margin of 26% for the fourth
quarter of 2018.

Research and development expense for the fourth quarter of 2019
totaled $1.5 million, down from $2.3 million in the fourth quarter
of 2018.  Selling, general and administrative expense decreased to
$3.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2019, compared to $6.9
million in the fourth quarter of 2018.

Operating loss for the fourth quarter of 2019 was $5.0 million,
compared to an operating loss of $8.7 million for the fourth
quarter of 2018.

Net loss in the fourth quarter of 2019 was $4.9 million, compared
to a net loss of $8.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2018.  The
net loss per share was $0.64 for the fourth quarter of 2019 as
compared to the net loss per share of $3.87 for the fourth quarter
of 2018.

As of Dec. 31, 2019, Obalon had cash and cash equivalents of $14.1
million and no outstanding debt.

"2019 was an eventful year for Obalon as we recapitalized and
repositioned the business to efficiently leverage our FDA-approved
weight loss system through our new retail treatment center business
model," said Bill Plovanic, president and chief executive officer.
"We are very pleased with the opening and initial operations of our
first treatment center in San Diego California, in addition to the
recent opening of our second treatment center in Orange County,
California.  Our priorities in 2020 are focused on expanding our
retail treatment center footprint, raising awareness of the Obalon
Centers for Weight Loss brand, and working to create shareholder
value by building a standardized, repeatable business using the
Company-owned or managed retail treatment center model."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/Jqr9TX

                          About Obalon

Obalon Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:OBLN) -- http://www.obalon.com/
-- is a San Diego-based company focused on developing and
commercializing novel technologies for weight loss.


OFFSHORE MARINE: May Borrow Up to $25K from AMEX on Revolving Basis
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jerry A. Brown authorized Offshore Marine Contractors to
obtain up to $25,000 of post-petition unsecured debt on a revolving
basis in monthly charges with American Express Corporation and its
affiliated entities and subsidiaries, and to pay obligations
arising therefrom in the ordinary course of business.

The Court also authorized the Debtor to pay $2,733.38 of
pre-petition balance owed to Amex.  

A copy of the order is available free of charge at
https://is.gd/RuyFLy from PacerMonitor.com.

                About Offshore Marine Contractors

Offshore Marine Contractors -- http://offshoremarine.net/-- is a
family-owned and operated company that provides offshore,
self-propelled and self-elevating liftboats for the petroleum
exploration and transportation industries.

Offshore Marine Contractors sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 19-13253) on Dec. 4,
2019.  In the petition signed by its president, Raimy Eymard, the
Debtor disclosed $32,345,576 in assets and $69,280,946 in debt.

Judge Meredith S. Grabill oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Stewart Robbins & Brown, LLC as legal counsel;
Bohman Morse, LLC as special maritime counsel; Baldwin Haspel Burke
& Mayer, LLC as special tax counsel; Pepperman, Emboulas, Schwartz,
& Todaro, LLC as accountant; and Stout Risius Ross, LLC as
financial advisor.


PANKEY'S TRANSPORTATION: Obtains Interim OK to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------------
Pankey's Transportation, Inc., asked the Bankruptcy Court to
authorize use of cash collateral to fund its business operations.
The Debtor currently owes secured creditor Univest National Bank
and Trust Co., approximately $800,000.  Univest holds a validly
perfected lien against all personal property of Debtor, including
deposit accounts, accounts, and account receivables.  

A copy of the motion is available at https://is.gd/npVZFu from
PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Judge Jerrold N. Poslusny, Jr., granted the Debtor's motion on an
interim basis, ruling that:  

   * Univest is granted a replacement perfected security interest
to the extent of cash collateral used, and to the extent and with
the same priority in the Debtor's post-petition collateral, and
proceeds thereof, that Univest Bank held in the Debtor's
pre-petition collateral,

   * Univest Bank will have a super priority administrative expense
claim, pursuant to Section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, to the
extent the adequate protection provided for proves insufficient.

A copy of the interim order is available for free at
https://is.gd/AFc3KZ from PacerMonitor.com.

                About Pankey's Transportation

Pankey's Transportation, Inc., a specialty transportation company
founded in 2016 by Georgette Miller, owns and operates tractors
which it uses to transport goods between various Federal Ground
Package System Inc. (FXG) terminals, as a sub-contractor for FXG.

The company filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No.
20-12184) on February 10, 2020.   The Law Offices of Dimitri L.
Karapelou, LLC represents the Debtor.  Judge Jerrold N. Poslusny,
Jr., is assigned to the case.


PENNRIVER COMMUNITY: Files Second Motion to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------------------
Pennriver Community, LLC, filed a second motion seeking authority
to use cash collateral pursuant to a budget covering the period
from February 2020 through May 2020.
  
Pursuant to a separate filing, the Court enjoined
parties-in-interest to file any responses and objections to the
cash collateral motion no later than February 28, 2020.

Hearing on the motion will be held on March 2, 2020 at 12:30 p.m.

                    About Pennriver Community

Pennriver Community, LLC, is a single asset real estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Pennriver Community sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 20-41082) on Jan. 26,
2020.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  Judge Mark A. Randon oversees the case.  Zousmer Law Group,
PLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


PG&E CORP: Subrogation Claimants Update Holdings for 6th Time
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas
Electric Company, the law firms of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and
Diemer & Wei, LLP, filed a sixth amended verified statement
pursuant to Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 2019 to
provide an updated list of the ad hoc group of subrogation claim
holders.

The ad hoc group of subrogation claim holders are comprised of 120
entities that hold liquidated and unliquidated insurance
subrogation claims1 against PG&E Corporation and Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, relating to certain California Wildfires and
other claims.  As of Feb. 26, 2020, members of the Ad Hoc
Subrogation Group with the largest subrogation claims are:

Allstate Insurance Company
2775 Sanders Road, Suite A2E
Northbrook, IL 60062

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $864,721,862.55
* Senior Notes: $6,000,000.00

Certain affiliates of American International Group, Inc.
175 Water Street
New York, NY 10038

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $333,299,328.37

Attestor Capital LLP
7 Seymour Street, Fourth Floor
London, XO W1H 7JW

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $834,742,084.00
* 7,488,514 shares of PG&E Corporation Common Stock
* Senior Notes: $20,500,000.00

The Baupost Group, L.L.C.
10 St. James Avenue Suite 1700
Boston, Massachusetts 02116

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $6,779,029,346.01
* 16,062,643 shares of PG&E Corporation Common Stock
* $850,000.00 in other unsecured wildfire-related claims
* $33,691,700.00 in other rights

California Casualty Indemnity Exchange
1875 S. Grant Street, Ste. 800
P.O. Box M
San Mateo, CA 94402

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $44,534,274.67

California Insurance Guarantee Association
101 North Brand Boulevard, 6th Floor
Glendale, CA 91203
P.O. Box 29066
Glendale, CA 91209

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $69,984,665.00

CNA Insurance Company
801 West Warrenville Road, Ste 700
Lisle, IL 60532

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $56,468,447.83

Certain affiliates of Farmers Insurance Exchange
6301 Owensmouth
Woodland Hills, CA 91367

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $53,014,504.14

Grange Insurance Association
200 Cedar St.
Seattle, WA 98121

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $42,263,476.67

Great American Insurance Company and certain affiliates
Great American Insurance Group
P.O. Box 5425 Cincinnati
OH 45201-5425

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $104,145,756.96

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and certain affiliates
1 Hartford Plaza
Hartford, CT 06155

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $368,179,659.27

Certain Affiliates of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
175 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02117

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $764,108,588.56
* $122,860,717.00 in surety bonds, unliquidated and
   contingent
   Insurance policies: unliquidated and contingent

Mercury Insurance and certain affiliates
555 W. Imperial Highway
Brea, CA 92821

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $63,489,833.00

QBE Americas, Inc.
One QBE Way
Sun Prairie, WI 53596

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $80,403,727.00

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and certain
affiliates
One State Farm Plaza
Bloomington, IL 61710

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $2,514,705,805.00
* Senior Notes: $86,000,000.00
* $5,000,000.00 in Non-Wildfire Subrogation Claims
* $530,000.00 in Contractual Obligations under Prepetition
   Settlement Agreement

Strategic Value Partners, LLC
100 West Putnam Ave
Greenwich, CT 06830

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $132,030,617.58
* Senior Notes: $118,250,000.00
* $15,000,000.00 in Revolving Credit Facility principal

Sixth Street Partners, LLC
2100 McKinney Ave., Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $851,789,253.59
* 1,000,000 shares of PG&E Corporation Common Stock
* Senior Notes: $152,124,000.00
* $9,884,083.91 in Revolving Credit Facility principal

The Travelers Indemnity Company
1 Tower Square, 0000-08MS
Hartford, CT 06183

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $831,269,291.00
* Senior Notes: $41,859,070.47
* $3,820,435.66 in non-Wildfire Subrogation Claims

Certain affiliates of United Services Automobile Association
9800 Fredericksburg
San Antonio, TX 78288

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $532,829,646.00
* Senior Notes: $20,000,000.00
* $38,000 in other claims

Zurich American Insurance Company
1299 Zurich Way
Schaumburg, IL 60196

* Wildfire Related Subrogation Claims: $66,012,437.33

Willkie represents only the Ad Hoc Subrogation Group. Willkie does
not represent or purport to represent any other entities in
connection with the Debtors' chapter 11 cases. Each member of the
Ad Hoc Subrogation Group is aware of, and has consented to,
Willkie's "group representation" of the Ad Hoc Subrogation Group.
No member of the Ad Hoc Subrogation Group represents or purports to
represent any other entities in connection with these chapter 11
cases.

Counsel to Ad Hoc Group of Subrogation Claim Holders can be reached
at:

         WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
         Matthew A. Feldman, Esq.
         Joseph G. Minias, Esq.
         Benjamin P. McCallen, Esq.
         Daniel I. Forman, Esq.
         787 Seventh Avenue
         New York, NY 10019-6099
         Telephone: (212) 728-8000
         Facsimile: (212) 728-8111
         E-mail: mfeldman@willkie.com
                 jminias@willkie.com
                 bmccallen@willkie.com
                 dforman@willkie.com

               - and -

         DIEMER & WEI, LLP
         Kathryn S. Diemer, Esq.
         Alexander J. Lewicki, Esq.
         100 West San Fernando Street, Suite 555
         San Jose, CA 95113
         Telephone: (408) 971-6270
         Facsimile: (408) 971-6271
         E-mail: kdiemer@diemerwei.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/2UNbSQ and https://is.gd/ylraGt

                    About PG&E Corporation

PG&E Corporation (NYSE: PCG) -- http://www.pgecorp.com/-- is a
Fortune 200 energy-based holding company, headquartered in San
Francisco.  It is the parent company of Pacific Gas and Electric
Company, an energy company that serves 16 million Californians
across a 70,000-square-mile service area in Northern and Central
California.

As of Sept. 30, 2018, the Debtors, on a consolidated basis, had
reported $71.4 billion in assets on a book value basis and $51.7
billion in liabilities on a book value basis.

PG&E Corp. and Pacific Gas employ approximately 24,000 regular
employees, approximately 20 of whom are employed by PG&E Corp.  Of
Pacific Gas' regular employees, approximately 15,000 are covered by
collective bargaining agreements with local chapters of three labor
unions: (i) the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers;
(ii) the Engineers and Scientists of California; and (iii) the
Service Employees International Union.

On Jan. 29, 2019, PG&E Corp. and its primary operating subsidiary,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 19-30088).

PG&E Corporation and its regulated utility subsidiary, Pacific Gas
and Electric Company, said they are facing extraordinary challenges
relating to a series of catastrophic wildfires that occurred in
Northern California in 2017 and 2018. The utility said it faces an
estimated $30 billion in potential liability damages from
California's deadliest wildfires of 2017 and 2018.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP and Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP are
serving as PG&E's legal counsel, Lazard is serving as its
investment banker and AlixPartners, LLP is serving as the
restructuring advisor to PG&E. Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and
noticing agent.

In order to help support the Company through the reorganization
process, PG&E has appointed James A. Mesterharm, a managing
director at AlixPartners, LLP, and an authorized representative of
AP Services, LLC, to serve as Chief Restructuring Officer.  In
addition, PG&E appointed John Boken also a Managing Director at
AlixPartners and an authorized representative of APS, to serve as
Deputy Chief Restructuring Officer. Mr. Mesterharm, Mr. Boken and
their colleagues at AlixPartners will continue to assist PG&E with
the reorganization process and related activities. Morrison &
Foerster LLP, as special regulatory counsel. Munger Tolles & Olson
LLP, as special counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
creditors on Feb. 12, 2019.  The Committee retained Milbank LLP as
counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor; Centerview
Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as claims and noticing agent.

On Feb. 15, 2019, the U.S. trustee appointed an official committee
of tort claimants.  The tort claimants' committee is represented by
Baker & Hostetler LLP.


PIER 1 IMPORTS: Brown, Whiteford Represent Term Lender Group
------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of Pier 1 Imports, Inc., et al., the law
firm of Brown Rudnick LLP and Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P.
submitted a verified statement under Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules
of Bankruptcy Procedure, to disclose that it is representing the Ad
Hoc Term Lender Group formed by certain lenders under that certain
Term Loan Credit Agreement dated April 30, 2014.

In or around February 2019, the Ad Hoc Term Lender Group engaged
Brown Rudnick to represent it in connection with the Members
holdings of the Term Loan. On or around February 14, 2020, the Ad
Hoc Term Lender Group retained Whiteford to act as co-counsel in
these Chapter 11 Cases.

Counsel represents the Ad Hoc Term Lender Group. Counsel, along
with Seward & Kissel LLP, also represents Wilmington Savings Fund
Society, FSB, in its capacity as the Term Loan administrative and
collateral agent. In the event of any conflict between the Ad Hoc
Term Lender Group and the Term Loan Agent, Counsel will represent
the interests of the Ad Hoc Term Lender Group only and S&K will
represent the interests of the Term Loan Agent. Other than the Ad
Hoc Term Lender Group and the Term Loan Agent, Counsel does not
represent or purport to represent any other entity or entities in
connection with the Chapter 11 Cases. In addition, the Ad Hoc Term
Lender Group does not claim or purport to represent any other
entity and undertakes no duties or obligations to any entity.

As of Feb. 26, 2020, members of the Ad Hoc Term Lender Group and
their disclosable economic interests are:

                                        Aggregate Principal Amount
                                         of Term Loan Obligations
                                        --------------------------

EATON VANCE
Two International
Place, 9th Floor
Boston, MA 02110                           $28,360,483.15

INSIGHT NORTH
200 Park Ave, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10166                         $11,230,192.57

MARATHON ASSET
One Bryant Park, 38th Floor
New York, NY 10036                         $19,458,922.55

MJX ASSET
12 East 49th Street, 38th Floor
New York, NY 10017                         $13,478,837.33

WHITEBOX ADVISORS
3033 Excelsior Boulevard, Suite 500
Minneapolis, MN 55416                      $34,601,066.78

ZAIS GROUP LLP
101 Crawfords Corner Road, Suite 1206
Holmdel, NJ 07733                          $13,386,333.24

Upon information and belief formed after due inquiry, Counsel does
not hold any claim against, or interests in, the Debtors or their
estates, other than claims for fees and expenses incurred in
representing the Ad Hoc Term Lender Group and the Term Loan Agent.
Brown Rudnick's address is 7 Times Square, New York, New York
10036, and One Financial Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 02111.
Whiteford's address is Two James Center 1021 E. Cary Street, Suite
1700, Richmond, Virginia 23219.

Counsel submits this Statement out of an abundance of caution, and
nothing herein should be construed as an admission that the
requirements of Bankruptcy Rule 2019 apply to Counsel's
representation of the Ad Hoc Term Lender Group.

Counsel to the Ad Hoc Term Lender Group can be reached at:

          WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON L.L.P.
          Christopher A. Jones, Esq.
          Vernon E. Inge, Esq.
          Corey S. Booker, Esq.
          Two James Center
          1021 E. Cary Street, Suite 1700
          Richmond, VA 23219
          Telephone: (804) 977-3300
          Email: cajones@wtplaw.com
                 vinge@wtplaw.com
                 cbooker@wtplaw.com

                    - and -

          BROWN RUDNICK LLP
          Robert J. Stark, Esq.
          Uchechi Egeonuigwe, Esq.
          Seven Times Square
          New York, NY 10036
          Telephone: (212) 209-4800
          Email: rstark@brownrudnick.com
                 uegeonuigwe@brownrudnick.com

          Steven D. Pohl, Esq.
          Sharon I. Dwoskin, Esq.
          BROWN RUDNICK LLP
          One Financial Center
          Boston, MA 02111
          Telephone: (617) 856-8200
          Email: spohl@brownrudnick.com
                 sdwoskin@brownrudnick.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/atS9wW

                    About Pier 1 Imports

Founded with a single store in 1962, Pier 1 Imports, Inc. --
http://www.pier1.com/-- is a leading omni-channel retailer of  
unique home décor and accessories. The Company's products are
available through approximately 930 Pier 1 stores in the U.S. and
online at pier1.com.

Pier 1 Imports, Inc., and 7 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 20-30805) on Feb. 17, 2020, to
pursue a sale of the assets.

Pier 1 disclosed $426,585,000 in assets and $258,254,000 in debt as
of Jan. 2, 2020.

The Hon. Kevin R. Huennekens is the case judge.

A&G Realty Partners is assisting the Company with its previously
announced store closures and lease modifications.  Pier 1 landlords
are encouraged to contact A&G Realty Partners through its website,
http://www.agrep.com/

Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP are serving
as legal advisors to Pier 1 in the U.S. and Canada, respectively.
AlixPartners LLP is serving as the Company's restructuring advisor
and Guggenheim Securities, LLC is serving as the Company's
investment banker.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions is the claims agent.


PITBULL REALTY: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Thru April 30
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael Fagone of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Hampshire authorized Pitbull Realty Group, Inc., to use cash
collateral to pay the costs and expenses incurred in the ordinary
course of business through  April 30, 2020, pursuant to the
budget.
  
As adequate protection for the use of the cash collateral:

   (a) the Debtor will make adequate protection payments to Primary
Bank in the amount required by the Stipulation, beginning on August
1, 2019 and on the same date of each month thereafter during the
use term;

   (b) the Debtor will make adequate protection payments to:

       * CNH Industrial Capital America LLC for $1,100;

       * Corporation Service Company, as Representative, which
Debtor believes to be Amur, for $64;

       * JCB Finance, a Program of Bank of the West, for $131.50;
and

       * Corporation Service Company, which Debtor believes to be
General Motors Corporation, for $408.

   (c) the Debtor will pay, for the benefit of all Record
Lienholders, property damage, liability and other insurance
premiums, pursuant to the Budget.

The Debtor will file a further application for on-going use of cash
collateral by March 24.  Objections must be filed by April 2 in
time for the hearing on April 7, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

A copy of the Order is available at PacerMonitor.com at
https://is.gd/x0FBv2 at no charge.

                   About Pitbull Realty Group

Pitbull Realty Group, Inc. is a limited liability company engaged
in single asset real estate, with principal place of business at
373 South Willow Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.  Pitbull Realty
Group Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No.
19-10923) on June 28, 2019.  The Debtor was estimated to have less
than $1 million in assets and/or liabilities. WILLIAM S. GANNON
PLLC is the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor hired Victor W. Dahar,
P.A., as attorney.



PLATINUM GROUP: Reports Waterberg Project Funding by Implats
------------------------------------------------------------
Platinum Group Metals Ltd. and Impala Platinum Holdings Ltd.
(JSE-IMP) ("Implats") announce that the shareholders of Waterberg
JV Resources Proprietary Limited have agreed to amend the terms of
the Implats Purchase and Development Option, which was due to be
exercised on April 17, 2020 following the Waterberg JV Co.'s
approval of the 2019 Definitive Feasibility Study on Dec. 5, 2019.

In consideration for this amendment, Implats has agreed to fund
100% of a new implementation budget and work programme effective
Feb. 1, 2020.  The programme, which has been approved by Waterberg
JV Co., will be aimed at increasing confidence in specific areas of
the DFS while awaiting the expected grant of a Mining Right and
Environmental Authorization and is estimated to cost approximately
US$4 million.  This amount will be offset against Implats' future
development funding commitment should it elect to exercise the
Purchase and Development Option.

The end date of Implats' Purchase and Development Option will be
amended from the original date of April 17, 2020 to 90 calendar
days following receipt of an executed Mining Right for the project.
All other terms of the Purchase and Development Option remain
unchanged.

The work program will include geotechnical drilling along the
planned decline positions as set out in the DFS, as well as
detailed review of critical areas that could affect the
implementation schedule and budget to mitigate execution risks. The
sustainability of water supply and a suitable housing strategy will
also be progressed further.  The Waterberg JV Co. technical
committee and Board have approved the work program that includes
the initial work for early 2020 outlined in the DFS. Platinum Group
will continue to be the Manager of the project, as directed by the
technical committee of Waterberg JV Co., and Implats will direct
the new work program.

The Mining Right application for the Waterberg project is well
advanced.

On Nov. 6, 2017, Implats purchased 15% of the Waterberg Project for
US$30 million.  Implats was also granted an option to increase its
stake to 50.01% through additional share purchases from Japan Oil,
Gas and Metals National Corporation for an amount of US$34.8
million and earn-in arrangements for US$130 million paid to
Waterberg JV Co. to fund development work on the Waterberg Project,
as well as a right of first refusal to smelt and refine Waterberg
concentrate.  A DFS Technical Report, effective Sept. 4, 2019, was
approved by Waterberg JV Co. shareholders on Dec. 5, 2019.  Before
the amendment announced today, Implats had until April 17, 2020 to
elect whether or not to exercise the Purchase and Development
Option.  The amendment allows for the additional project de-risk
work to be funded by Impala at 100% with Implats' decision whether
to exercise the full Purchase and Development Option to be made
within 90 calendar days from the date on which the full Mining
Right is executed by the Department of Mineral Resources and
Energy.

The work program to be funded by Impala will be a credit to
Implats' required US$130 million funding commitment should Implats
elect to exercise its Purchase and Development Option.  If Impala
does not elect to exercise the Purchase and Development Option,
funding provided by Implats will not be a credit to Implats, and
instead will be an out of pocket expense to Implats. Impala will
provide a 90-day notice to Waterberg JV Co. if it elects to not
continue with 100% project funding.  The proposed program and
agreement outlined above will be subject to final documentation and
amendments of the formal Purchase and Development Option, the Call
Option and other agreements which are expected to be completed
promptly.

                 About Platinum Group Metals Ltd.

Headquartered in British Columbia, Canada, Platinum Group Metals
Ltd. -- www.platinumgroupmetals.net -- is a platinum and palladium
focused exploration, development and operating company conducting
work primarily on mineral properties it has staked or acquired by
way of option agreements or applications in the Republic of South
Africa and in Canada.  The Company's sole material mineral property
is the Waterberg Project.  The Company continues to evaluate
exploration opportunities both on currently owned properties and on
new prospects.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, in Vancouver, Canada, the Company's
auditor since 2007, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Nov. 25, 2019, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has significant amounts of
debt payable without any current source of operating income.  The
Company also has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Platinum Group reported a net loss of $16.77 million for the year
ended Aug. 31, 2019, compared to a net loss of $41.02 million for
the year ended Aug. 31, 2018.  As of Aug. 31, 2019, Platinum Group
had $43.66 million in total assets, $44.82 million in total
liabilities, and a total shareholders' deficit of $1.16 million.


PONCE REAL ESTATE: Triangle REO Objects to Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor Triangle REO PR Corp. submitted a objections to Ponce Real
Estate Corp.'s Disclosure Statement.

The Amended Disclosure Statement fails to comply with the
requirements of Section 1125 of the Code.

The Disclosure Statement does not provide for Triangle's retention
of liens, rights and remedies as a secured creditor.

Counsel for Creditor:

        Eyck O. Lugo   
        EDGE Legal Strategies, PSC
        252 Ponce de Leon Ave., Suite 2100
        San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918
        Tel: (787) 522-2000
        Fax: (787) 522-2010  
        E-mail: elugo@edgelegalpr.com

                  About Ponce Real Estate Corp.

Ponce Real Estate Corp. as registered in the Department of State of
Puerto Rico on February 11, 1955, under registry number 4514, as a
domestic for-profit-corporation, operating the business of owning
to lease real estate properties for commercial and/or residential
purposes.  Its principal place of business is located at 49 Mendez
Vigo Street, Ponce, Puerto Rico 00730, which is property of PRE.
Mr. Francisco I. Vilarino Rodriguez a/k/a Frank Vilarino is the
sole owner and president.

Ponce Real Estate Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-06805) on Nov. 24, 2018.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have assets
of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of the same range.
The Debtor tapped EMG Despacho Legal, CRL as its legal counsel, and
Tamarez CPA, LLC as its accountant.


PRINCETON AVENUE: 5% Shareholders Object to Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Creditors Arlene Pero and Jill Swersky, are minority shareholders
of Princeton Avenue Group., each owning a 5 percent stake, object
to the adequacy of the Disclosure Statement describing the Chapter
11 Plan proposed by the Debtor.

In their objection, Pero and Swersky assert that:

  * The Disclosure Statement fails to provide adequate information
for creditors, and in particular, Pero and Swersky, to evaluate and
vote on the Plan. Significant modifications will be necessary to
comply with Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Until such
modifications are made, the Court should decline to permit
solicitation of the Plan.

  * The Disclosure Statement, in fact, completely omits Swersky,
and the secured Swersky Claim simply does not fit into any of the
classes of claims as described in the Disclosure Statement and
Plan.

  * The Disclosure Statement and Plan must be amended to include
the Swersky Claim and provide sufficient information regarding the
treatment of the Swersky to permit both Swersky and Pero to make an
informed judgment regarding the Disclosure Statement and Plan.

  * The Plan does not appropriately classify all of the claims
against the Debtor, which violates section 1123(a)(1) of the
Bankruptcy Code requiring a plan to designate classes of claims and
interests.

A full-text copy of Pero and Swersky's objections dated Feb. 13,
2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/rael4hh from PacerMonitor
at no charge.

Counsel to Pero and Swersky:

         Edmond M. George, Esquire
         Alicia M. Sandoval, Esquire
         Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP
         1120 Route 73, Suite 420
         Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
         Tel: (856) 795-3300
         E-mail: edmond.george@obermayer.com
                 alicia.sandoval@obermayer.com

                About Princeton Avenue Group

Princeton Avenue Group, Inc., is the fee simple owner of a property
located at 1301 Kings Highway, Swedesboro having an appraised value
of $710,000.

Princeton Avenue Group sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 19-19841) on May 14, 2019.  The Debtor disclosed $722,600
in assets and $2,020,505 in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing. The Hon. Jerrold N. Poslusny Jr. is the case judge.
McDowell Law, PC, led by Ellen M. McDowell, is the Debtor's
counsel.


PROTEC INSTRUMENT: Unsecureds to Get Up to 100% in 6 Years
----------------------------------------------------------
Protec Instrument Corporation and related and jointly administered
debtor, Protec RE Holdings Inc. filed a Plan of Reorganization and
a corresponding Disclosure Statement.

PIC will continue to operate, to service its customers and at the
same time, to provide for a repayment of its creditors sums in
excess as would be realized in a chapter 7 proceeding.  In sum, the
Plan provides that the Debtor will pay in full the claims of the
taxing authorities, the Bank; and provide for a 100% repayment to
the holders of allowed unsecured claims.

Payments will be made from funds contributed as the new value
contribution by the 100% shareholder of the Debtor together with
sums generated from the reorganized Debtor's operations.

Class 1 consists of the claims of Berkshire Bank which is the
holder of a first priority secured claim in the principal amount of
$1,525,736, plus interest.  The payment of the Class 1 Claim will
be bifurcated as the Debtor will pay the principal together with
interest from the confirmation date and at the same time, will pay
the accrued Interest and Costs of Collection in full, but said sums
will not bear interest.  This class is impaired.

The Class 2 Claimant is the City of Waltham for sums due consisting
of all outstanding real estate taxes, water & sewer claims and
excise taxes which as of the Petition Date was outstanding in the
sum of $55,667.  The Class 2 Claimant will be paid in full with
statutory interest of 14% commencing on the Effective date over 11
monthly installments of $5,710 if not previously satisfied, there
being no prepayment penalty.  This class is impaired.

Class 4 consists of all Unsecured Claims with claims of $368,841.
Each Holder of an Allowed Class 4 Claim will receive payment in an
amount equal to up to 100% which sums will be paid over a period of
six years six annual installments.  This class is impaired.

Class 5: Claims of Insiders with an asserted claims in the sum of
$4,021,266.  The Class 5 claimants will receive nothing under the
Plan and the claims shall be cancelled upon Confirmation.  This
class is impaired.

The Debtor will pay the claims  from its operations
post-confirmation.  The Debtor expects to have sufficient cash on
hand to make the payments required on the Confirmation Date.

A full-text copy of the Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan
dated Feb. 17, 2020, is available at https://tinyurl.com/vzfshdk
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

     Counsel for Debtor:
     Nina M. Parker, Esq.
     Parker & Lipton
     Parker & Associates LLC
     10 Converse Place, Suite 201
     Winchester, MA 01890
     Fax: 781-729-0187
     E-mail: nparker@parkerlipton.com

                  About Protec Instrument Corp.

Protec Instrument Corporation manufactures analytical instruments.
Protec RE Holdings owns a property located at 38-40 Edge Hill Road,
Waltham, Massachusetts having an appraised value of $2.17 million.

Protec Instrument Corp. and Protec RE Holdings sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Mass. Lead Case No. 19-12164) on June 25,
2019.  As of the Petition Date, Protec Instrument disclosed assets
of $3,472,694 and liabilities of $2,725,521; and Protec RE
disclosed assets of $2,170,000 and liabilities of $2,458,971.  The
Hon. Christopher J. Panos is the case judge.  Parker & Associates
is the Debtors' counsel.


QMAXX PRODUCTS: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor:       QMAXX Products Group, LLC
                      1781 Larkin Williams Rd.
                      Fenton, MO 63062

Business Description: QMAXX Products Group --
                      https://www.qmaxxproducts.com --
                      offers lubricantss for long-term protection
                      against rust and corrosion.

Involuntary Chapter
11 Petition Date:     February 27, 2020

Court:                United States Bankruptcy Court
                      Eastern District of Missouri

Case Number:          20-41063

Petitioners' Counsel: Daniel D. Doyle, Esq.
                      LASHLY & BAER, P.C.
                      714 Locust St.
                      St. Louis, MO 63101
                      Tel: (314) 436-8373
                      E-mail: ddoyle@lashlybaer.com

Alleged creditors who signed the involuntary petition:

  Petitioners                  Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
  -----------                  ---------------   ------------
  James L. Bannes             Salary & Expenses        $6,527
  1009 Mallow Drive
  Ellisville, MO 63011

  Stacey L. Brown             Salary & Expenses       $78,000
  1515 Redwood Drive
  St. Clair, MO 63077

  Max McCreery                     Expenses            $3,256
  13009 Dieterle Ln
  St. Louis, MO 63127

A full-text copy of the Involuntary Petition is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

                      https://is.gd/KDjbpk


RANCHO CIELO: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Rancho Cielo Estates, LTD
        15721 S. Western Avenue Suite 200
        Gardena, CA 90247

Business Description: Rancho Cielo Estates, a real estate
                      developer, owns various parcels in San
                      Diego, California, having an aggregate
                      current value of $1.89 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 29, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California

Case No.: 20-12306

Judge: Hon. Sheri Bluebond

Debtor's Counsel: Jeffrey S Shinbrot, Esq.
                  JEFFREY S. SHINBROT, APLC
                  15260 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200
                  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
                  Tel: 310-659-5444
                  E-mail: jeffrey@shinbrotfirm.com

Total Assets: $3,207,977

Total Liabilities: $142,576,987

The petition was signed by Peter Fagrell, president.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                    https://is.gd/YovpQO


RENNOVA HEALTH: Christopher Diamantis Quits as Director
-------------------------------------------------------
Christopher E. Diamantis has resigned as a director of Rennova
Health, Inc.  In submitting his resignation, Mr. Diamantis did not
express any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating to
the Company's operations, policies or practices.  Mr. Diamantis had
served as a director since Nov. 2, 2015 and previously served as a
director of Medytox Solutions, Inc., a predecessor of the Company,
from April 24, 2013 to Nov. 5, 2015.

As a result of previously-announced payments Mr. Diamantis had made
on behalf of the Company as well as additional advances, the
Company owed Mr. Diamantis approximately $20.8 million as of Dec.
31, 2019.  The Company and Mr. Diamantis are currently negotiating
the cancellation of such indebtedness in exchange for shares of a
to be authorized class of preferred stock that would provide Mr.
Diamantis with more than 50% of the voting power of the Company's
capital stock.  Although no assurance can be given that such an
agreement will be entered into, the Board of Directors of the
Company believes it would be in the best interests of the Company
and its stockholders and has authorized the exchange, subject to
final documentation.  Since Dec. 31, 2019, Mr. Diamantis has made
further advances to the Company aggregating approximately $1.5
million.

                     About Rennova Health

Rennova Health, Inc. -- http://www.rennovahealth.com/-- operates
three rural hospitals in Tennessee and provides diagnostics and
supportive software solutions to healthcare providers.

Rennova Health reported a net loss to common shareholders of $245.9
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss to
common shareholders of $108.53 million for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had $16.57 million in
total assets, $76.46 million in total liabilities, $5.83 million in
redeemable preferred stock - Series I-1, $1.94 million in
redeemable preferred stock - Series I-2, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $67.66 million.

Haynie & Company, in Salt Lake City, Utah, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Oct. 18, 2019, on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
significant net losses, cash flow deficiencies, negative working
capital and an accumulated deficit.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


REVA MEDICAL: Seeks Plan & Disclosures Approval
-----------------------------------------------
REVA Medical, Inc., submitted a memorandum of law in support of
approval of Disclosure Statement for the Prepackaged Chapter 11
Plan of REVA Medical, Inc., approval of solicitation procedures on
a final basis and confirmation of the Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan
of REVA Medical, Inc. pursuant to section 1129 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The Debtor's reorganization has been a consensual process every
step of the way.  Following months of good faith, arm's-length
negotiations with key stakeholders, the Debtor entered into a
restructuring support agreement with Goldman Sachs International
and certain of its affiliates, Senrigan Master Fund, and certain
affiliates of Elliott Management Corporation, pursuant to which the
Debtor would implement the transactions set forth in the Plan.  The
agreement embodied in the RSA allowed the Debtor to propose the
Plan and commence solicitation prior to the Petition Date.  Through
the Plan, the Debtor will emerge significantly delivered,
recapitalized through two exit financing facilities, and positioned
for long-term growth that will allow the Debtor to provide leading
bioresorbable polymer technologies.  Significantly, the Plan
received overwhelming support from holders of Claims entitled to
vote to accept or reject the Plan solicited before this case was
filed, with all creditors entitled to vote voting to accept the
Plan.  The Plan satisfies the requirements for confirmation set
forth in Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Accordingly, the
Disclosure Statement and the Solicitation Procedures should be
approved and the Plan should be confirmed.

The Disclosure Statement contains the necessary information for
holders of Claims entitled to vote to make an informed decision
about whether to vote to accept or reject the Plan, including,
among other things, information on the Debtor's business operations
and capital structure, an overview of certain events proceeding and
leading to the commencement of the Debtor's bankruptcy case, an
overview of the RSA and negotiations leading to the entry of the
RSA, a summary of the classification and treatment of all classes
of creditors and equity interests, financial information and
projections, a valuation analysis, a liquidation analysis, a
provision governing distributions under the Plan, the means for
implementation of the Plan, the risk factors affecting the Plan,
and a summary of the Bankruptcy Code and other requirements for
confirmation of the Plan.

Accordingly, based on the foregoing and the lack of any objection
to the Disclosure Statement, the Debtor submits that the Disclosure
Statement satisfies the requirements of Section 1125 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum of Law dated Feb. 17, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/svfd9rj from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

Proposed Counsel to the Debtor:

     Stuart M. Brown (DE 4050)
     1201 North Market Street, Suite 2100
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Telephone: (302) 468-5700
     Facsimile: (302) 394-2341
     Email: stuart.brown@us.dlapiper.com

     -and-

     Thomas A. Califano (admitted pro hac vice)
     Jamila Justine Willis (admitted pro hac vice)
     1251 Avenue of the Americas
     New York, New York 10020
     Telephone: (212) 335-4500
     Facsimile: (212) 335-4501
     Email: thomas.califano@us.dlapiper.com
     jamila.willis@us.dlapiper.com

About REVA Medical

REVA Medical, Inc. -- https://www.revamedical.com/ -- is a medical
device company focused on the development and commercialization of
bioresorbable polymer technologies for vascular applications.  The
Company's products include the Fantom Encore and MOTIV
bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary
artery disease and below-the-knee peripheral artery disease,
respectively. REVA is currently selling Fantom Encore in Germany,
Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy
and Turkey and is in the process of commercializing Fantom Encore
in seven additional countries.  REVA was founded in 2010 and is
based in San Diego, California.

REVA Medical filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
20-10072) on Jan. 14, 2020.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of
$5.9 million and total debt of $104.5 million as of Jan. 13, 2020.
The case is assigned to Hon. John T. Dorsey.  The Debtor's counsel
is Stuart M. Brown, Esq., of DLA PIPER LLP (US).


RHETT RANCE: Perkins Coie Represents Alpine Investors, 2 Others
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 cases of Rhett Rance Smith, the law firm of
Perkins Coie LLP submitted a verified statement under Rule 2019 of
the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, to disclose that it is
representing the following creditors:

Alpine Investors IV SBIC, L.P.
3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2330
San Francisco, CA 94111

Alpine Investors IV L.P.
3 Embarcadero Center, Suite 2330
San Francisco, CA 94111

Beneco Systems, LLC
9089 East Bahia Drive, Suite 100
Scottsdale, AZ 85260

Benarb, LLC
3800 North Central Avenue, Suite 460
Phoenix, AZ 85012

The Alpine/Beneco Creditors are co-plaintiffs in prepetition
litigation against the Debtor and currently hold an unsecured
prepetition claim based on an arbitration award. The arbitration
award is for $23,148,388, plus post-judgment interest.

The Alpine/Beneco Creditors have retained Perkins Coie to represent
them with respect to their interests in connection with the
above-captioned case.

Perkins Coie has advised the Alpine/Beneco Creditors about the
implications of joint representation and the advantages and risks
involved, and Perkins Coie has obtained the informed consent of the
Alpine/Beneco Creditors to Perkins Coie's joint representation.

Counsel to Alpine/Beneco Creditors can be reached at:

          PERKINS COIE LLP
          Bradley A. Cosman, Esq.
          Hal Michael Clyde, Esq.
          Rebecca K. Setlow, Esq.
          2901 N. Central Ave., Ste. 2000
          Phoenix, AZ 85012-2788
          Tel: 602-351-8000
          E-mail: BCosman@perkinscoie.com
                  MClyde@perkinscoie.com
                  RSetlow@perkinscoie.com

A copy of the Rule 2019 filing, downloaded from PacerMonitor.com,
is available at https://is.gd/0Jyfsf

                    About Rhett Rance Smith

The Chapter 11 case is In re Rhett Rance Smith (Banks. D. Ariz.
Case No. 2:20-bk-01307-MCW).



RODRIGUEZ CANO: Disclosure Statement Conditionally Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge S. Karen Jennemann has ordered that the Disclosure Statement
filed by Rodriguez Cano, Inc., d/b/a Aloma Kids Academy, is
conditionally approved.

An evidentiary hearing will be held on March 23, 2020 , at 1:00
p.m. in Courtroom 6A, 6th Floor, George C. Young Courthouse, 400
West Washington Street, Orlando, FL 32801 to consider and rule on
the disclosure statement and any objections or modifications and,
if the Court determines that the disclosure statement contains
adequate information within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1125, to
conduct a Plan confirmation hearing.

Creditors and other parties in interest shall file with the clerk
their written acceptances or rejections of the plan (ballots) no
later than seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

Any party desiring to object to the Disclosure Statement or to
confirmation of the Plan will file its objection no later than
seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

In accordance with Local Bankruptcy Rule 3018−1, the debtor shall
file a ballot tabulation no later than four days before the date of
the Confirmation Hearing.

                     About Rodriguez Cano

Rodriguez Cano, Inc., d/b/a Aloma Kids Academy, is a provider of
child day care services.  It filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-05890) on Sept. 9, 2019, in Orlando, Fla.  In
the petition signed by Margarita Rodriguez, president, the Debtor
was estimated to have assets of $500,000 to $1 million and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.  BartoloneE Law, PLLC,
represents the Debtor.


RUBY PIPELINE: S&P Cuts ICR to BB on Increased Recontracting Risk
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating and senior
unsecured debt rating on Ruby Pipeline LLC to 'BB' from 'BBB-'. At
the same time, S&P placed the ratings on CreditWatch with negative
implications.

S&P assigned a '3' recovery rating to Ruby's senior unsecured
notes, which suggests meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%)
recovery in the event of a payment default.

"The downgrade follows our revised assessment of Ruby's contract
profile given our view of the recontracting process and its impact
on both the business and financial risk profiles. About 65% of
Ruby's firm take-or-pay contracts are set to expire by mid-2021,
and we expect significantly lower renewal rates and shorter
contracts based on current market conditions. Therefore, we believe
that business risk has increased. Furthermore, many of the
contracts pay above-market rates and are unlikely to be renewed at
the same rates. This will likely result in additional cash flow
deterioration and put pressure on credit metrics, increasing
financial leverage," S&P said.

"The CreditWatch negative placement reflects our view that
liquidity will come under pressure due to refinancing risk over the
next two years and a weighted-average maturity of less than two
years would lead us to lower the rating by one notch. We expect to
resolve the CreditWatch over the next 90 days," the rating agency
said.


SABRE CORP: S&P Puts 'BB' Issuer Credit Rating on Watch Negative
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed its ratings on U.S.-based travel
technology solutions company Sabre Corp., including its 'BB' issuer
credit rating, on CreditWatch with negative implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows Sabre's announcement that it
intends to spend an incremental $150 million on technology
initiatives in 2020 and that the global health crisis related to
the coronavirus will hurt EBITDA by $50 million to $80 million in
the first quarter of 2020. The CreditWatch placement reflects S&P's
view that these factors will cause net leverage to rise well above
its leverage threshold for a downgrade of 4x in 2020. At this time,
S&P is in the process of evaluating its forecast for Sabre's
leverage beyond 2020, which includes its view of the base business'
operating performance, the affect on bookings and profitability
from the coronavirus beyond the first quarter of 2020, and the
company's level of technology spending beyond 2020."

S&P intends to resolve the CreditWatch placement once it evaluates
its leverage forecast for Sabre in 2020 and 2021 by incorporating
the planned increase in technology spending and updating the rating
agency's operating performance expectations to include the negative
impact of the coronavirus. S&P also plans to meet with the
company's management to discuss their financial policy before
coming to a resolution, which the rating agency expects will occur
over the next two weeks.

"We could lower the rating by one notch to 'BB-' if we believe that
net leverage will remain above our 4x leverage threshold through
2021. This would likely occur if we expect Sabre to maintain
elevated technology spending with no incremental near-term EBITDA
generation. Additionally, we could lower the rating if we expect
fears of a pandemic would significantly reduce travel bookings for
a prolonged period. Though unlikely, we could lower the rating by
two notches to 'B+' if we expect leverage will sustainably remain
above 4.5x," S&P said.

"We could affirm the 'BB' rating if we believe there is a clear
path for leverage to return to 4x or lower in 2021," the rating
agency said.


SANAM CONYERS: To Seek Approval of Amended Plan March 26
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Wendy L. Hagenau the Disclosure Statement filed by Sanam
Conyers Lodging, LLC, et. al., the debtor in this case, is
conditionally approved.

March 20, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing written
acceptances or rejections of the Amended Plan.

The attorney for the Debtor will transmit a copy of the Conditional
Order, the Amended Plan, the Amended Disclosure Statement, and a
ballot by mail to creditors.

March 26, 2020 is fixed for the hearing on final approval of the
conditionally approved Amended Disclosure Statement and for
confirmation of the Amended Plan.  The hearing will be held at 1:30
p.m. in Courtroom 1403, United States Courthouse, 75 Ted Turner
Dr., SW, Atlanta, Georgia, before the undersigned .

The Court, having scheduled the Final Hearing on Approval of
Debtor's Disclosure Statement and Confirmation of Debtor's Plan for
March 26, 2020, extends the 45-day time-frame to confirm the
Debtor's proposed Plan under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1129(e) through and
including the date now fixed for confirmation or any subsequent
date to which the hearing is continued.

March 20, 2020 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the conditionally approved Amended Disclosure
Statement and confirmation of the Amended Plan.

This First Amended Plan of Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code is filed pursuant to Sections 1121 through 1124 of
the Bankruptcy Code.  It supersedes and replaces the Plan of
Reorganization previously filed in the case.  The Plan proposes to
pay creditors of Aum Shri Ganeshay Namaha, LLC, d/b/a Baymont Inn
Covington, in the manner and amounts set forth.

The Debtor has entered into an agreement with Dukk, LLC whereby
Dukk, LLC is to purchase Debtor's hotel located at 10111 Alcovy Rd.
in Covington, GA 30014 and conducting business as Baymont Inn
Covington.  Dukk, LLC has offered to pay $2,400,000 for the Hotel,
and then lease the Hotel back to the reorganized Debtor for a
period of five years and grant the reorganized Debtor an option to
repurchase the Hotel during the five-year lease term.  Dukk, LLC is
owned by Dhansukh Patel, who is the brother of Sunita Patel's
husband.  Dukk, LLC is an insider as defined under Section 101(31).
The agreement with Dukk, LLC is proposed as a Stalking Horse Bid.

The Plan provides for the payment of administrative claims incurred
in the Case, priority tax claims, and general unsecured claims.
Allowed administrative claims will be paid on the later of the
Effective Date1 or within 30 days from the date that an
administrative claim is allowed.
Priority Tax Claims will be paid in full on the Effective Date.
Allowed general unsecured claims will be paid the full amount of
their allowed claim within ninety days after the Effective Date.

Allowed general unsecured claims less than $1,000 in Class D
(Convenience Class will be paid in full on the effective date.
Claimants having claims in excess of $1,000 may opt in to this
class and be paid $1,000 in full satisfaction of their allowed
claims.  Class D Claimants are impaired and may vote on the Plan.

Allowed claims of general unsecured claimants in Class E will be
paid 25% of their allowed claims over a period not to exceed 60
months after the Effective Date.  Distributions will be made
quarterly from a distribution pool of not less than $6,000.
Distributions to Class E claimants will commence 90 days after the
Effective Date and will continue every calendar quarter until such
time as each claimant has received payment of 25% of their allowed
claims.  Class E claimants are impaired and may vote on the Plan.

The balance remaining from the proceeds from the sale of the Hotel
of approximately $200,000 will be applied for the initial funding
of the Plan and is an amount adequate to pay all priority tax
claims and all administrative claims in the case.

The Plan will pay unsecured creditors from profits generated by the
operation of the Hotel by the Reorganized Debtor.  The Reorganized
Debtor will pay unsecured creditors from a fund of $2,000 per
month, to be distributed quarterly.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Feb. 19, 2020,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/qnnlnbf from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Danowitz Legal, PC
     300 Galleria Parkway, Suite 960
     Atlanta, GA 30339
     770-933-0960

                  About Sanam Conyers Lodging

Sanam Conyers Lodging owns the hotel located at 10111 Alcovy Rd. in
Covington, GA 30014 and conducting business as Baymont Inn
Covington.

Sanam Conyers Lodging, LLC, and affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Lead Case No. 19-54798) on March 26,
2019.  Danowitz Legal, PC, is the Debtors' counsel.  Judge Wendy L.
Hagenau oversees the case.


SARAH AIR: Trustee Selling Aircraft to Wright for $345K
-------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Hagan, Chapter 11 trustee for Sarah Air, LLC, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Michigan to authorize
the sale of a Cessna model T206H, bearing manufacturer's serial
number T20608 144, and FAA Registration Number N488BJ, with
Lycoming model T10540—AJ1A engine with serial number L-10383-61A
and with Hartzell propeller model HC-F3YR-1RFserial number DB-233B,
amphibious floats with serial numbers 34157 and 34158, landing
wheelgear, amphibious tow bar, bumpers, ropes, rear seat and all
other parts, logbooks and manuals related to the airframe and the
engine and which are owned by the Debtor and in the Debtor's
possession or control, to Brian Wright for $345,000.

Among the assets of the estate is the Aircraft.  The Trustee asks
approval to sell it free and clear of all liens, interests and
encumbrances with liens and encumbrances attaching to the proceeds
of the sale.

The Aircraft is encumbered by a security interest granted to
KeyBank National Association dated July 19, 2019 securing
obligations in excess of $100 million.  The Security Agreement is
in dispute and is subject to an adversary proceeding being
prosecuted by the Trustee, being Adversary Proceeding 19-80119-swd.
The Adversary Proceeding asserts that the Security Agreement
should be voided on various grounds.  The Granting of the Security
Agreement was done within the 90 days of the Petition Date to
secure obligations of separate entities referred to as the
Interlogic Borrowers.   

The Trustee does not believe that the Aircraft is encumbered by any
other obligation except the obligation, if any, owed to KeyBank.
KeyBank consents to the sale set forth in the Motion.  In addition,
the Security Agreement is in a bona fide dispute as set forth in
the Adversary.

Any transfer taxes or other taxes or fees imposed upon the sale of
the Aircraft will be paid from the sale proceeds.

The Trustee has hired Goshen Air Center to assist in the sale of
the Aircraft.  The Broker has been very active in obtaining offers
for the Trustee on the Aircraft and was instrumental in bringing
the accepted offer to the Trustee.  

The Trustee has accepted an offer for the Aircraft in the amount of
$345,000 pursuant to the Aircraft Purchase Agreement.   If
necessary to effectuate a sale, the Trustee, with the consent of
the Buyer, reserves the right to extend the acceptance date and
Closing Date beyond the contract terms or to substitute a different
Buyer on substantially the same terms but at a price no less than
the Purchase Price.

The Trustee has reviewed sales comparisons for similar Aircraft as
well as appraisals of the aircraft and believes that the purchase
price for the Aircraft is fair and reasonable.

The Trustee asks approval for the payment of ordinary closing costs
including fees and taxes imposed upon the sale of the Aircraft, and
customary fees charged by Insured Aircraft Title Service, LLC who
acts as escrow agent in the transfer of the Aircraft to the Buyer.
All valid liens, interests and encumbrances attaching to the
Aircraft will attach to the net proceeds from the sale of the
Aircraft.

The transfer of the Aircraft will be "as is, where is" and free and
clear of all liens, interests and encumbrances.

The sale is subject to bankruptcy court approval and any better
offers submitted to the Trustee up until the deadline to object to
the sale.  Better offers may be submitted to Kevin M. Smith,
attorney for the bankruptcy estate by mail or email at
ksmith@bbssplc.com.  In the event that there are competing bidders,
the Trustee will establish bidding procedures to obtain the highest
purchase price.  

The Trustee also asks the approval of the Broker's commission at
2.5% of the gross sales price, to be paid at closing.  After the
payment of all undisputed liens, closing costs, fees and taxes,
Broker's Commission and the like, the sale proceeds will be held by
the Trustee subject to a determination of the validity and extent
of the attachment of the Security Agreement to the Aircraft and its
proceeds.

A copy of the Contract is available at https://tinyurl.com/qp3fwnz
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                        About Sarah Air

Sarah Air, LLC, an air conditioning contractor in Pinellas Park,
Fla., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Mich. Case No.
19-04268) on Oct. 8, 2019, listing under $1 million in both assets
and liabilities.  The case is jointly administered with six other
affiliates under Najeeb Ahmed Khan (Bankr. W.D. Mich. Lead Case No.
19-04258.) The Debtor tapped Robert F. Wardrop, II, Esq., at
Wardrop & Wardrop. P.C., as counsel.

Kelly M. Hagan was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.
The Trustee is represented by Kevin M. Smith, Esq., at Beadle
Smith, PLC.


SARAH ZONE: Seeks Access to Cash Collateral Thru July 12
--------------------------------------------------------
Sarah Zone, Inc., asks the Bankruptcy Court to authorize use of
cash collateral through and including July 12, 2020 to pay all
expenses as set forth in the budget, as well as all quarterly fees
owing to the Office of the U.S. Trustee and all expenses payable to
the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owes Open Bank approximately
$1,600,000 under a first loan, secured by assets owned by the
Debtor's affiliates who were named as borrowers under the first
Loan.  The Debtor also owes the bank approximately $1,500,000 under
a second loan, secured by the building owned by S&Y who was a
guarantor of the second loan.  

In addition, the Debtor also obtained prepetition loans from:

   * its founder and president, Tae Hyun Yoo and his wife, Susan
Yoo, for $350,000, and

   * an individual named Chong Taek Lee, for $10,000, which loan is
secured by substantially all of the Debtor's assets.  The Debtor
believes that Chong Taek Lee, Tae Hyun Yoo and Susan Yoo are
currently the only parties that have a perfected security interest
in the Debtor's cash.

As adequate protection, the Debtor proposes to grant Lee and the
Yoos a valid, enforceable, non-avoidable and fully perfected
replacement liens on, and security interests in, the Debtor's
post-petition assets to the extent of any diminution in value of
said secured parties' interests in the Debtor's pre-petition
collateral to the same extent, validity, scope and priority of
their respective pre-petition liens.

A copy of the motion is available at https://is.gd/MWiIBF from
PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Hearing on the motion is scheduled on March 4, 2020 at 9 a.m.
                                         
                      About Sarah Zone

Sarah Zone, Inc., is a merchant wholesaler of apparel, piece goods,
and notions.  The company filed its Articles of Incorporation in
California on Oct. 5, 2004, according to public records filed with
California Secretary of State.

Sarah Zone sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-20836) on Sept. 17, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Tae Hyun Yoo, president, the Debtor
disclosed $3,833,130 in assets and $7,301,855 in liabilities.
Judge Sandra R. Klein oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped Levene,
Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP, as its legal counsel.


SAUK PRAIRIE: Moody's Alters Outlook on $38MM 2013A Bonds to Pos.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Sauk Prairie Healthcare, Inc.,
WI's B1 rating. This action affects $38 million of Series 2013A
fixed rate bonds issued by the Wisconsin Health and Educational
Facilities Authority. The outlook has been revised to positive from
stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Affirmation of the B1 reflects challenges associated with
relatively high leverage and restrictive financial covenants,
although Moody's expects adequate headroom to financial covenants
will be maintained. Margins will be upheld at current levels and
will benefit from the conversion of several clinics to rural health
designation, low Medicaid and a largely commercial payer
environment, a social consideration. Volume trends and revenue
growth will be aided by the ongoing development of key service
lines and clinical affiliations with tertiary providers in the
surrounding area. However, competitive risks are elevated given the
hospital's small size and close proximity to the competitive
Madison market. Capital expenditures will remain modest and should
aid in support of good liquidity metrics. Favorably, pension and
operating lease liabilities are limited.

RATING OUTLOOK

The positive outlook incorporates its view that SPH will sustain
current levels of operating performance and liquidity metrics. This
will support improved leverage metrics and provide greater
assurance that SPH will maintain improved covenant headroom.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - Sustained improvement in headroom to bond covenants and
    maintenance of current levels of operating performance

  - Further deleveraging of balance sheet

  - Continued growth of cash reserves

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - Reduced covenant headroom or covenant breach

  - Weakened operating performance, liquidity or debt metrics

  - Change in market dynamics that challenges volumes and
    revenue growth

LEGAL SECURITY

The Series 2013A bonds are secured by a joint and several security
interest in Pledged Revenues of the Obligated Group and a mortgage
on SPH. Sauk Prairie Memorial Hospital, Inc. is the only member of
the Obligated Group. A debt service reserve fund (DSRF) is in
place.

PROFILE

SPH is a 36 staffed bed, 1,988 admission hospital located in the
Village of Prairie du Sac, WI. Prairie du Sac is located
approximately 27 miles northwest of downtown Madison. While SPH
competes with the three health systems based in Madison, the
hospital also maintains referral partnerships with all three
Madison providers and contracts with each of their respective
provider-owned health plans.


SCIENCE APPLICATIONS: S&P Rates New $600MM Term Loan 'BB+'
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level rating and '4'
recovery rating to Science Applications International Corp.'s
(SAIC) proposed $600 million incremental term loan B due 2027. The
'4' recovery rating indicates its expectation for average (30%-50%;
rounded estimate: 45%) recovery.

At the same time, S&P revised its recovery rating on the company's
secured credit facility, which comprises a $400 million revolver
due 2023, a $1.068 billion term loan A ($918 million outstanding as
of Nov. 1, 2019) due 2023, a $1.05 billion term loan B ($1.039
billion outstanding) due 2025, and the new $600 million incremental
term loan B, to '4' from '3'. The '4' recovery rating indicates
S&P's expectation for average (30%-50%; rounded estimate: 45%)
recovery.

In addition, S&P assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '6'
recovery rating to SAIC's proposed $400 million unsecured notes due
2028. The '6' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for
negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) recovery.

The company plans to use the proceeds from the new debt, along with
cash on hand, to fund its recently announced $1.2 billion
acquisition of Unisys Federal.

S&P's issuer credit rating on SAIC is unchanged and reflects the
company's increased leverage for the acquisition combined with its
increased capabilities in high-growth areas, such as cloud
migration and information technology (IT) modernization. The rating
agency expects the company to reduce its debt to EBITDA to the
2.8x-3.2x range over the next 12-24 months while maintaining funds
from operations (FFO) to debt of between 24% and 26% after using
its strong free cash flow for debt repayment.

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

-- Pro forma for the acquisition, the company's proposed capital
structure comprises a $400 million revolver due 2023, a $1.068
billion term loan A ($918 million outstanding as of Nov. 1, 2019)
due 2023, a $1.05 billion term loan B ($1.039 billion outstanding)
due 2025, a new $600 million incremental term loan B due 2027, and
$400 million of new unsecured debt.

-- The company also set up a $200 million accounts receivable (AR)
facility. S&P assumes the facility is fully drawn and treat it as a
priority claim.

-- S&P has valued the company on a going-concern basis using a
5.0x multiple of the rating agency's projected emergence EBITDA.
Other key assumptions at default include LIBOR of 2.5% and the
revolver is 85% drawn.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Default year: 2025
-- EBITDA at emergence: $301 million
-- Multiple: 5x

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $1.43
billion
-- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 100%/0%
-- Value available for secured claims: $1.23 billion
-- Secured debt claims: $2.62 billion
-- Recovery expectations: 30%-50% (rounded estimate: 45%)
-- Value available for unsecured claims: $0
-- Unsecured debt claims: $1.8 billion
-- Recovery expectations: 0%-10% (rounded estimate: 0%)

  Ratings List
  Science Applications International Corporation

  Issuer Credit Rating    BB+/Negative/--    BB+/Negative/--

  New Rating  
  Science Applications International Corporation

  Senior Secured  
  US$600 mil term B bank ln due 2027    BB+
   Recovery Rating                      4(45%)
  Senior Unsecured  
  US$400 mil nts due 2028               BB-
   Recovery Rating                      6(0%)
  
  Issue-Level Rating Unchanged; Recovery Rating Revised
                              To         From
  Science Applications International Corporation

  Senior Secured              BB+
   Recovery Rating            4(45%)     3(50%)


SHAPPHIRE RESOURCES: Disclosure Statement Hearing Reset to April 29
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California,
Los Angeles Division, held a hearing to consider the Stipulation to
Continue Chapter 11 Status Conference, continue hearing to consider
adequacy Of Disclosure Statement, extend deadline for Debtor
Shapphire Resources, LLC to file Amended Disclosure Statement and
Amended Plan of Reorganization.

On February 13, 2020, Judge Robert Kwan ordered that:

  * The Stipulation is approved.

  * The chapter 11 Status Conference and the hearing to consider
the adequacy of the disclosure statement is continued from March
25, 2020, at 11:00 a.m., to April 29, 2020, at 11:00 a.m., in
courtroom 1675 of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California [Los Angeles Division], located at
255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.

  * The deadline for Shapphire Resources, LLC, to file and serve
its amended disclosure statement and amended chapter 11 plan is
extended from Feb. 12, 2020, to March 11, 2020.

A full-text copy of the order dated Feb. 13, 2020, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yx85n45w from PacerMonitor at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Raymond H. Aver
       LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND H. AVER
       A Professional Corporation
       10801 National Boulevard, Suite 100
       Los Angeles, California 90064
       Telephone: (310) 571-3511
       E-mail: ray@averlaw.com

                   About Shapphire Resources

Shapphire Resources, LLC's principal assets are located at 2770
Cold Plains Drive Hacienda Heights, CA 91745.

Shapphire Resources previously filed for bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 10-57493) on Nov. 4, 2010.

Shapphire Resources filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-15033) on April 24, 2017.  In the petition
signed by Susan Tubianosa, manager, the Debtor was estimated to
have $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities. The
Hon. Neil W. Bason oversees the case. The Law Offices of Raymond H.
Aver, a professional corporation, represents the Debtor.


SOUTHERN ILLINOIS FAMILY: March 31 Disclosure Hearing Set
---------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 12, 2020, debtor Southern Illinois Family Fun Center, Inc.,
a/k/a SI Bowl, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Illinois an Amended Disclosure Statement and
Plan.

March 31, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Melvin
Price US Courthouse, 750 Missouri Ave, East St Louis, IL 62201, is
the hearing to consider approval of the Disclosure Statement.

March 19, 2020, is s fixed for filing and serving written
objections to the disclosure statement.

A full-text copy of the notice dated February 13, 2020, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/wx5aemr from PacerMonitor at no
charge.

         About Southern Illinois Family Fun Center

Southern Illinois Family Fun Center, Inc., owns and operates a
bowling alley in Carterville, Illinois with regular bowling,
duckpin bowling, arcade, snack bar, and a lounge.

Southern Illinois Family Fun Center, Inc. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ill. Case
No.19-40241) on March 28, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor was estimated to have assets of less than $100,000 and
liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Laura K. Grandy.  Steven M. Wallace, Esq., at
Heplerbroom, LLC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR, Outlook Negative
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB' issuer rating on
aerostructures manufacturer Spirit AeroSystems Inc. and removed all
ratings from CreditWatch, where they were placed with negative
implications on Dec. 23, 2019.

S&P raised its issue rating on the company's notes due 2026 to
'BBB-' from 'BB' and revised the recovery rating to '1' from '3' as
the notes are now secured. It also affirmed its 'BB' issue rating
on the company's other unsecured notes. The '3' recovery rating is
unchanged.

The agreement with Boeing provides for advance payments that will
reduce cash outflows in the first half of 2020, but result in lower
cash flows over the next two years.  Boeing has agreed to pay
Spirit AeroSystems $225 million in first-quarter 2020, comprising
$70 million to support suppliers, only $10 million of which has to
be repaid, and $155 million of prepayments for deliveries over the
next two years. The prepayment will be recovered through lower cash
receipts as Spirit AeroSystems delivers 737 MAX components over the
next two years, reducing future cash flow. The agreement also
extends the repayment date of $123 million in advances it received
last year to 2022 from 2020. S&P now expects free cash flow to be a
use of $300 million-$400 million in 2020, with almost all of the
outflow in the first quarter of the year. S&P believes free cash
flow will improve to a positive $150 million-$200 million in 2021
as MAX production increases.

Covenant relief and a short-term, delayed-draw term loan will
bolster liquidity.   Spirit AeroSystems has amended its credit
facility to loosen covenants through first-quarter 2021, although
the facility is now secured and pricing is higher. However,
covenant headroom may tighten if production does not increase as
S&P expects or the company cannot reduce costs to match a lower
production rate. The company has also entered into a $375 million
delayed-draw term loan that it can access through Aug. 15, 2020,
but it matures at the earlier of Sept. 15, 2020, or 45 days after
the MAX receives certification by the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA). Spirit AeroSystems also recently announced
that it is cutting its dividend to $0.01 a share from $0.12, which
should save about $48 million a year.

The negative outlook reflects that although the Boeing advances and
covenant relief from lenders will reduce near-term cash outflows
and improve liquidity, when the MAX resumes production and at what
rate is still uncertain.

"We could lower the rating in the next six to 12 months if we
believe FFO to debt will not increase above 20% in 2021 or
liquidity becomes constrained. This could occur if certification of
the MAX is delayed further, production is at a lower rate than we
currently expect, the company cannot reduce costs sufficiently
during the period of lower production or encounters problems
restarting production, or cash outflows are significantly higher
than we forecast in 2020," S&P said.

"We could revise the outlook back to stable if we believe FFO to
debt will increase above 20% in 2021 and will likely improve
further. This could occur if MAX production resumes successfully in
the timeframe and at the rate that we expect and the costs and cash
outflow during the period of lower production are not significantly
higher than we have forecast," the rating agency said.


STAK DESIGN: Has Final Approval to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stacey G.C. Jernigan authorized STAK Design, Inc., to use
cash collateral from the period beginning with the Petition Date
and ending on the termination date, which is the earliest to occur
of:

   (a) the date of consummation of a sale or other disposition of
all or substantially all of STAK’s assets pursuant to section 363
of the Bankruptcy Code, whether done by one or a series of
transactions;  or

   (b) the entry of an order:
       * dismissing the Chapter 11 case;
       * converting the Chapter 11 case to a case under Chapter 7
of the Bankruptcy Code;
       * invalidating, subordinating, or otherwise sustaining any
challenge to the adequate protection lien granted to Valliance
Bank.

The Court ruled that Valliance Bank is granted a valid, perfected,
dollar-for-dollar replacement lien in all property of the Debtor's
estate, except for causes of action, including claims or causes of
action arising under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code.  

The adequate protection lien will be subject and subordinate only
to (a) unpaid fees and expenses of the United States Trustee
pursuant to Section 1930(a)(6) of title 28 of the U.S. Code, or the
Clerk of the Court, and (b) unpaid professional fees and expenses
payable to any legal or financial advisors retained by the Debtor
pursuant to Sections 327, 328, 363 or 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code,
as applicable.

The Court further ruled that the prepetition tax liens currently
being held by Dallas County and Tarrant County or which will arise
during the course of the Debtor's Chapter 11 case pursuant to
applicable non-bankruptcy law will neither be primed by nor
subordinated to any liens granted thereby pursuant to this final
order, notwithstanding any provisions of the interim order or any
order pertaining to post-petition financing, use of cash
collateral, the sale of the Debtor's assets, or any agreements
validated by any of the said orders.

A copy of the final order is available for free at
https://is.gd/zPk04d from PacerMonitor.com.

                      About STAK Design

STAK Design, Inc. -- http://www.stakdesign.com/-- is a custom
design, engineering, and manufacturing firm.  The Company works
directly with architects, designers, developers, and general
contractors for custom millwork, retail displays, kiosks, RMUs,
specialty environments, and custom tradeshow exhibits.

The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No.
20-30424) on Feb. 4, 2020.  In the petition signed by Stanley
Zalenski, president, the Debtor was estimated to have between
$500,000 and $1 million in assets and $1 million and $10 million in
liabilities.  Judge Harlin Dewayne Hale is assigned to the case.
Mcguire, Craddock & Strother, P.C., represents the Debtor.


TENNECO INC: S&P Downgrades ICR to 'B+'; Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered the issuer credit rating on Tenneco Inc.
to 'B+' from 'BB'. The outlook is stable. In addition, S&P lowered
the issue-level rating on the company's secured debt to 'B+' from
'BB' and lowering the issue-level rating on its senior unsecured
notes to 'B' from 'BB-'.

"The downgrade reflects our belief that Tenneco Inc. is facing a
number of headwinds.  These challenges include falling vehicle
production, uncertainty regarding the potential global impact from
the coronavirus outbreak, unfavorable product mix, and need to
bring down debt leverage. Consequently, S&P is projecting
significantly lower-than-anticipated credit metrics, when compared
to our prior expectations, over the next couple of years,
particularly free operating cash flow to debt. The stable outlook
reflects our view that the company's debt to EBITDA, as measured by
S&P, will remain below 5.0x and free operating cash flow will stay
positive over the next 12 months," S&P said.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's view that the company's debt to
EBITDA, as measured by the company, will remain below 5.0x and free
operating cash flow will stay positive over the next 12 months.

"We could lower our rating on Tenneco if, for example, global
vehicle demand began to drop faster than expected or the company
failed to expand EBITDA margins, thereby causing the company's free
operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt to fall close to zero or below
or debt to EBITDA, as measured by S&P, to exceed 5.0x on a
sustained basis," S&P said.

"We could revise the outlook to positive if the company can realize
steady operational improvement, show resilience to adverse economic
conditions, and increase its EBITDA margins, reflecting a stronger
competitive position and consistent program launch execution. At
the same time, we would expect the company's FOCF to debt to stay
above 5%," the rating agency said.


TRANSMONTAIGNE PARTNERS: S&P Affirms 'BB-' ICR; Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed the 'BB-' issuer credit rating on
TransMontaigne Partners L.P. with stable outlook. It also affirmed
the 'B+' issue-level rating on Transmontaigne's senior unsecured
notes. The '5' recovery rating is unchanged.

"Although actual consolidated leverage remains elevated for the
rating, at around 7.5x, we believe the strategy to apply excess
cash flows to prepay debt and reach consolidated debt to EBITDA
below 6x by 2023 is credit positive. The company should achieve
consolidated leverage around 6x for us to maintain the rating. The
inability to distribute dividends to financial sponsor ArcLight
Partners makes us confident excess cash flows would be applied to
prepay debt in the next few years," S&P said.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectations that EBITDA
generation will be around $150 million-$170 million in 2020, and
that by 2021 consolidated leverage will decrease because of debt
prepayments.

"We would downgrade Transmontaigne if consolidated leverage remains
elevated and its strategy changes such that we don't envision debt
repayment with excess cash flows," S&P said.

"While unlikely at this time, we could raise the ratings if the
company significantly outperforms our expectations or makes an
acquisition that expands its size and scope without increasing
leverage. To upgrade Transmontaigne, we would also look for the
partnership to demonstrate less aggressive financial policy
decision-making and for consolidated leverage to remain below
5.5x," the rating agency said.


TUPPERWARE BRANDS: Moody's Lowers Sr. Unsec. Rating to B1
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Tupperware Brands
Corporation's senior unsecured rating to B1 from Baa3.
Concurrently, Moody's assigned a Corporate Family Rating of Ba3, a
Probability of Default rating of Ba3-PD and a speculative grade
liquidity rating of SGL-4 for Tupperware. All ratings remain on
review for downgrade.

The downgrade reflects Tupperware's continued underperformance with
sales declining about 12%-13% in 2019 following a decline of 8.25 %
in 2018. The company's independent sales force is a significant
driver of growth across the company's direct selling business
model, and the ongoing declines in active representatives continues
to negatively impact business performance. At the same time the
company continues to make significant investment in systems, tools
and capabilities which will continue to pressure profit margins. In
addition, increased competition, near-term risk to global economic
growth associated with the coronavirus, and senior management
turnover will create challenges for Tupperware to stem revenue
declines and quickly execute its turnaround strategy. Moody's
recognizes how certain social elements -- including changes to
consumer shopping patterns and the attractiveness of individuals
serving as Tupperware sales representatives -- may be negatively
impacting the company's "direct selling" business model. Moody's is
concerned that these challenges will continue to pressure cash
flow, notwithstanding the company's ongoing efforts to improve
operating effectiveness and streamline its cost structure.

The downgrade also reflects Tupperware's announcement that it will
delay the filing of its 2019 audited financials in order to
finalize an investigation related to certain financial reporting
errors at its Fuller Mexico beauty business and to finalize its
2019 tax rate. Tupperware estimates that it will record an
impairment charge for Fuller of about $31 million in 2019. The
company also announced its need for financial covenant relief
related to its existing maximum debt to EBITDA leverage ratio in
its $650 million secured revolving credit facility. Moody's
understands that the company has received the approvals it requires
from its bank group to amend the leverage covenant. In connection
with the amendment Tupperware will provide additional collateral
and subsidiary guarantees to the secured revolving credit facility.
Both the revolving credit facility and the company's unsecured
notes benefit from a secured guaranty from Dart Industries,
Tupperware's wholly owned subsidiary which owns Tupperware's
trademarks and intellectual properties. However, the company's
unsecured notes will be structurally subordinated to borrowings
under the amended revolving credit facility, as the notes will not
benefit from the additional collateral and subsidiary guarantees
that are being added to support the bank facilities

Moody's review for downgrade will consider the company's ability to
meet its annual filing requirement specified in its credit
agreement and bond indenture and will take into account the full
year 2019 results once filed. The review will focus on Tupperware's
ability to stabilize its recently negative operating trends and
improve its weak liquidity profile, including maintaining adequate
availability under its $650 million revolving credit facility. The
review will also consider the company's plans to address the June
2021 maturity of its unsecured notes, which will become current in
just over a quarter.

Ratings downgraded and placed on review for downgrade:

Tupperware Brands Corporation

  Senior unsecured rating to B1 (LGD5) from Baa3

Ratings Assigned and placed on review for downgrade:

  Corporate Family Rating at Ba3

  Probability of Default Rating at Ba3-PD

Ratings Assigned:

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating at SGL-4

Outlook Actions:

The ratings remain on review for downgrade.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Tupperware's Ba3 CFR (on review for downgrade) reflects the
company's unique direct selling business model, which is highly
reliant upon its ability to recruit and retain sales
representatives around the world. There is long term risk to direct
sellers in developing markets as increasing retail penetration,
e-commerce activity, and competition gradually diminish the current
distribution advantages. Developing markets also tend to include
more volatile economies and foreign exchange rate exposure. In
addition, the company's modest scale relative to other consumer
product peers and sensitivity to discretionary consumer spending
heighten credit risks. The ratings are supported by Tupperware's
well-recognized brand name, global presence and moderate financial
leverage.

The SGL-4 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating reflects Tupperware's
weak liquidity profile. Although Moody's expects the company to
remain free cash flow positive, this is largely the result of the
dividend suspension in 2019, which will result in cash savings of
$75 million in 2020 compared to 2019 and $135 million compared with
2018. Tupperware's operating cash flow generation continues to
decline due to its declining revenues and profitability.
Furthermore, Tupperware's $600 million unsecured bonds due June
2021, will become current in just over a quarter and this
refinancing risk adds pressure to the company's liquidity profile.

Social risks are a meaningful consideration given the company's
direct sales business model. Changing demographics, economic and
employment conditions can affect the company's ability to recruit
and retain its sales force and can also influence how consumers
shop. The business model can also come under scrutiny by regulators
Tupperware faces important corporate governance challenges. There
has been meaningful turnover at the senior management ranks.
Environmental considerations are not considered material to
Tupperware's credit profile, but the company must monitor its land,
water, energy and raw material usage.

Tupperware Brands Corporation is a global manufacturer and direct
seller of consumer products across multiple categories including
food storage, preparation and serving items, and beauty and
personal care products. Products are sold through a worldwide sales
force that includes approximately 3 million independent dealers.
Tupperware generated approximately $1.8 billion in annual revenue

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Consumer
Packaged Goods Methodology published in February 2020.


TUPPERWARE BRANDS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'B'; Ratings on Watch Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered all of its ratings on U.S.-based
Tupperware Brands Corp. to 'B' from 'BB+' and placed all of its
ratings on CreditWatch with negative implications.

The rating actions follow the company's announcement of its
preliminary fiscal 2019 results. The company also announced it will
delay the filing of its 10K and that it has sought and received
approvals for covenant relief on its revolving credit facility, and
provided weaker-than-expected 2020 guidance.  S&P is uncertain
about the company's 2020 operating performance, ability to file its
annual financial statements in a timely basis, and ability to
refinance its upcoming bond maturity with satisfactory terms.

"The downgrade reflects our belief that fiscal 2020 debt leverage
will exceed 4x due to the company's weak guidance and amendment to
its $650 million revolving credit facility due March 2024. It also
reflects our revision downward of the business risk on the company
given the deterioration of the business and our view that
management's execution of the business has been poor. We believe
that a complete review of the business strategy is necessary for a
complete turnaround," S&P said.

The CreditWatch placement reflects further downside risk to the
ratings if the company does not finalize the amendment on its
revolving credit agreement, does not file its 10K within its
extension period, or does not refinance its notes before June 2020,
or if additional guidance for 2020 is much weaker than recently
provided.

"We plan to resolve the CreditWatch after the company files its 10K
and reports fiscal 2019 results, provides further details on its
financial outlook for 2020, or discloses its refinancing plans.
Upon the resolution of the CreditWatch listing, we may lower or
affirm our ratings on the company. Specifically, we could downgrade
the company into the 'CCC' category if the company's notes become
current and there is no clear refinancing plans or if we believe
the operating outlook for 2020 is substantially weaker than we
forecast. On the other hand, we could affirm our ratings on
Tupperware if the company launches a refinancing that we believe
will be completed in a timely manner and at reasonable terms," S&P
said.

"We will also review the issue-level and recovery ratings on the
senior unsecured notes. Given the likely conversion of the
unsecured revolver to secured status, it is likely that we will
revise the recovery ratings downward and lower the issue-level
ratings by at least one-notch," the rating agency said.


VALADOR INC: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Through April 30
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Klinette Kindred of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia authorized Valador Inc.'s use of cash
collateral through April 30, 2020 pursuant to the terms, conditions
and limitations set forth in the Fifth Interim Consent Order.

Valador is indebted to Essex Bank under and in connection with a
$3,500,000 line of credit that Essex Bank previously provided to
Valador.  Valador's indebtedness to Essex Bank under the Loan is
secured by a first-priority security interest against all of the
Valador's inventory, equipment, accounts, accounts receivable,
chattel paper, instruments, letter of credit rights, letters of
credit, documents, deposit accounts, investment property, money,
other rights of payment and performance, general intangibles,
payment intangibles, software, and all records relating to any of
the foregoing and all products and proceeds of any of the
foregoing.

Valador grants in favor of Essex Bank a first-priority
post-petition security interest and lien in, to and against all
assets which are or have been acquired, generated or received by
Valador subsequent to the Petition Date, as collateral and security
for the repayment of all indebtedness and amounts that are owed by
Valador to Essex Bank under the Loan and the Loan Documents. In
addition, Valador grants Essex Bank a first-priority post-petition
security interest and line in the Valador's DIP Accounts and all
funds now or hereafter on deposit therein.

To the extent that the other protections granted in the Fifth
Interim Consent Order are insufficient to provide adequate
protection of Essex Bank's interests in the Collateral, Essex Bank
is granted a priority administrative claim against the Debtor and
the Debtor-in-Possession having priority over all administrative
expenses other than quarterly fees that are due to the U.S.
Trustee's Office, including, but not limited to, the administrative
expenses described in Sections 503(b) and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code and any expenses or fees incurred by Valador or its estate in
connection with the prosecution of avoidance actions under Sections
544 through 550 of the Bankruptcy Code.

As additional adequate protection to Essex Bank, Valador will
deliver to Essex Bank an adequate protection payment in the amount
of $8,500 per month.

A copy of the Fifth Interim Consent Order is available at
PacerMonitor.com at https://is.gd/mezdoZ at no charge.

                        About Valador Inc.

Headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, Valador, Inc., is a business
that delivers solutions for collecting, maintaining, visualizing,
and protecting its clients' information.  It focuses on four key
business areas: modeling and simulation, information assurance,
management consulting, and software engineering.  It employs
innovative solutions such as the use of 3D immersive visualization
to address its clients' complex challenges including decision
support, strategic planning, risk management, safety and
reliability, assessment of alternatives, and information security.

Valador sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 18-14168) on Dec. 13, 2018.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to
Judge Klinette H. Kindred.  Richard Hall, Esq., is the Debtor's
legal counsel.



VARTEK LLC: Gets Approval to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine Peek McEwen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida issued a final order authorizing Vartek
L.L.C. to use cash collateral in accordance with the budget.

Seacoast Business Funding will maintain its replacement liens and
security interest in all of Vartek's assets acquired post-petition
as those assets are defined as collateral in its pre-petition
Agreement, including, but not limited to, all accounts, inventory
and deposit accounts and all proceeds thereof including the
proceeds from the sale of the Debtor's assets, with the following
delineated exceptions: (a) goods that constitute raw materials
under the Bailment Agreement with Watkins Manufacturing Corporation
dated June 27, 2019, and (b) the identified cash collateral in the
aggregate amount of $165,518.88, previously defined as Released A/R
in the Original Order.

In addition, the Debtor is directed to maintain insurance coverage
on all assets that serve as collateral to secure any
party-in-interest's rights in accordance with any of its
obligations under any loan and security documents.

                       About Vartek L.L.C.

Vartek, L.L.C. -- https://vartekllc.com/ -- is a privately owned
manufacturer of flexible PVC hose and tubing. It manufactures
reinforced hose and non-reinforced tubing products, and serves the
construction, industrial, irrigation, landscape, marine, medical,
pool, spa and waterscape markets. Vartek maintains a warehouse in
Tampa, Fla., and a warehouse in San Diego, Calif.

Vartek sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case
No.19-08083) on Aug. 26, 2019.  In the petition signed by CRO
William A. Long Jr., the Debtor was estimated to have assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.  Judge Catherine Peek McEwen oversees the Debtor's case.
Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


VCHP NEPTUNE: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: VCHP Neptune Beach, LLC
           d/b/a Red Roof Inn Neptune Beach
        1401 Atlantic Boulevard
        Neptune Beach, FL 32266

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 28, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 20-00740

Debtor's Counsel: Jacqueline Calderin, Esq.
                  AGENTIS PLLC
                  55 Alhambra Plaza, Suite 800
                  Coral Gables, FL 33134
                  Tel: 305-722-2002
                  E-mail: jc@agentislaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Dmitry Tomkin, Vendian Capital
Management Limited as manager of Vendian-Covenant Hospitality
Partners, LLC, the sole and managing member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 10 unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/kiY3JL


VCHP SPRINGFIELD: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: VCHP Springfield, LLC
          d/b/a Red Roof Inn Springfield
          d/b/a State House Inn Springfield
        101 East Adams Street
        Springfield, IL 62701

Business Description: VCHP Springfield, LLC operates hotels and
                      motels.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 28, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida

Case No.: 20-00741

Debtor's Counsel: Jacqueline Calderin, Esq.
                  AGENTIS PLLC
                  55 Alhambra Plaza
                  Suite 800
                  Coral Gables, FL 33134
                  Tel: 305-722-2002
                  E-mail: jc@agentislaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Dmitry Tomkin, Vendian Capital
Management Limited as manager of Vendian-Covenant Hospitality
Partners, LLC, the managing member.

A copy of the petition containing, among other items, a list of the
Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                     https://is.gd/gDbtDV


VESTCOM PARENT: Moody's Affirms B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed the B3 corporate family rating
for Vestcom Parent Holdings, Inc.'s and its probability of default
rating at B3-PD. The company's first lien credit facilities were
affirmed at B2, reflecting support provided by second lien debt.
The outlook is stable.

Issuer: Vestcom Parent Holdings, Inc.

  Corporate Family Rating, affirmed at B3

  Probability of Default Rating, affirmed at B3-PD

  Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility due 2022, affirmed
  B2 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan due December 2023, affirmed
  B2 (LGD3)

Outlook is Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Vestcom's B3 CFR reflects company's high but declining
debt-to-EBITDA leverage of approximately 5.9x (including Moody's
standard adjustments) for FY 2019, its leading position in mission
critical shelf-edge price communication and technology enabled
services, its small scale relative to other Services companies,
customer concentration offset by contractual revenue base, and
sustained track record of expansion within it niche. Vestcom has
several key customers that are up for contractual renewals in 2020,
which Moody's anticipates to be successfully renewed, but
nevertheless present some risk in the near term. The company
expanded its 2019 revenue by 7% year over year through a
combination of price increases and increased volumes, as it
maintained tight cost controls and continued to improve its sold
product mix towards higher value add services, resulting in 12%
year over year EBITDA growth. Vestcom generated positive free cash
flow, which it has largely used towards reinvesting in the
company's business. Moody's anticipates that Vestcom will generate
approximately $10-$15 million in free cash flow in 2020, as it
implements its recent wins and executes several key client
renewals. Aggressive financial strategy executed by the company's
sponsors constrains the current financial flexibility of Vestcom,
limiting its ability to withstand potential revenue misses if they
were to occur.

The stable rating outlook incorporates its expectations that
Vestcom will meet its growth targets over the course of 2020, which
will contribute to lower leverage over the next 12-18 months.
Moody's also assumes in the stable outlook that Vestcom sustains
its EBITDA margin, generates positive free cash flow, and maintains
adequate liquidity. The stable outlook does not incorporate sponsor
distributions or other leveraging events.

Ratings could be upgraded if the company's performance results in
debt-to-EBITDA leverage below 5.5x through a combination of organic
growth and debt repayment. Good liquidity along with good cash flow
generation near high single digits as a percentage of total debt
would also be factors necessary for an upgrade.

Declining revenue due to a loss of a significant client would
likely result in a downgrade. Increased pricing pressure on the
company's products leading to sustained revenue and EBITDA
declines, additional debt funded distributions, liquidity erosion,
or negative free cash flow could also result in a downgrade.

Moody's considers Vestcom's liquidity adequate, with expectations
of modest free cash flow of approximately $10-15 million in 2020
and undrawn $60 million revolving credit facility. Moody's
forecasts that 2020 EBITDA will be sufficient to fund annual cash
interest of about $48 million, as well as cash taxes, capital
expenditures, modest working capital needs, and annual required
term loan amortization of about $4.3 million during 2020. Moody's
expects ongoing capital expenditures to be approximately $12
million. About half of ongoing capital investments could be
curtailed if necessary, though Moody's does not envision such a
scenario. The company does sometimes spend on equipment (tooling,
software development, servers and other specialized production
equipment) in advance of revenue generation from new contracts, but
there is not a significant time lag.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Vestcom Parent Holdings, Inc. (Vestcom) provides mission critical
shelf-edge communications and technology enabled services to the
retail industry. It maintains headquarters in Little Rock,
Arkansas. Charlesbank Capital Partners acquired the company from
Court Square Capital Partners in December 2016. Total revenue for
FYE 2019 was $318 million.


VETERANS FELLOWSHIP: Given Until Aug. 16 to Confirm Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brendan Shannon of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware extended to Aug. 16 the period during which Veterans
Fellowship Ministries, Inc. must confirm its Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

               About Veterans Fellowship Ministries

Veterans Fellowship Ministries filed a voluntary petition for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 19-10857) on April 16, 2019, disclosing under $1 million in
both assets and liabilities.  Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon
oversees the case.  The Debtor hired Montgomery McCracken Walker &
Rhoads, LLP as its legal counsel.



VIP CINEMA: S&P Lowers ICR to 'D' on Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on VIP Cinema
Holdings Inc. to 'D' from 'CCC-'.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured first-lien debt to 'D' from 'CCC' and its
issue-level rating on the company's second-lien debt to 'D' from
'C'. S&P's recovery ratings on VIP's debt are unchanged.

The downgrade follows VIP's announcement that it filed for a
voluntary reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code.


WATERS RETAIL: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Waters Retail TPA, LLC
        4622 Maple Ave., Ste 200
        Donald L. Silverman
        Dallas, TX 75219-1073

Case No.: 20-30644

Business Description: Waters Retail TPA, LLC is a Single Asset
                      Real Estate debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: February 27, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas

Debtor's Counsel: Vickie L. Driver, Esq.
                  CROWE & DUNLEVY, P.C.
                  2525 McKinnon St., Suite 425
                  Dallas, TX 75201
                  Tel: (214) 420-2142
                  E-mail: vickie.driver@crowedunlevy.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Donald L. Silverman, manager.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                      https://is.gd/bhWyAA


WELBILT INC: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'BB-' ICR
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Welbilt Inc. to negative
from stable. At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB-' issuer credit
rating on the company and its 'BB-' issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured credit facilities ($400 million revolving
credit facility due in 2023 and $900 million term loan due in
2025). The recovery rating remains '3'.

At the same time, S&P raised its issue-level rating on the
company's $425 million senior unsecured notes due in 2024 to 'B+'
from 'B' and revised the recovery rating on the senior unsecured
notes to '5' from '6'. The upgrade of the senior unsecured notes is
a result of the termination of the accounts receivable
securitization program that reduced priority claims on debt.

Welbilt faces short-term margin compression through 2020, which S&P
expects to improve in 2021.  S&P believes some near-term margin
pressure might come from unfavorable manufacturing variances
(increase in labor and overhead costs) due to softer-than-expected
sales, along with plant inefficiencies that the rating agency
expects to transition to new production layouts as part of the
transformational program. S&P expects this, coupled with a slowdown
of projects from large chain customers in the Americas and Europe,
Middle East, and Africa (EMEA), will result in leverage remaining
elevated above 5x over the next few quarters.

The negative outlook reflects S&P's expectation that it could lower
the rating on Welbilt over the next 12 months if operating
performance is weaker than it forecasts. S&P believes leverage will
improve to about 5x by the end of 2020 from the low-5x area as of
Sept. 30, 2019, through synergies realized from the transformation
program and the voluntary pay down of the revolver, partially
offset by flat revenue growth and near-term margin pressure related
to manufacturing inefficiencies within plants, but there is some
execution risk to this forecast.

"We could lower our rating on Welbilt if debt leverage remained
above 5x with no clear prospects for improvement. We believe this
would most likely be the result of end-market headwinds
intensifying or a delay in synergy realization, hurting revenue
growth and deteriorating EBITDA margins in the next 12-18 months.
Furthermore, we could lower our rating if headroom under its
leverage or coverage covenants declined below 15%," S&P said.

"We could revise our outlook to stable over the next 12-18 months
if the company reduced leverage comfortably below 5x and we
believed the company were committed to maintaining financial
policies that would support this level of leverage. We believe this
scenario would incorporate the full execution and realization of
the synergies layout in the company's transformation program, which
drives leverage improving and sustaining under 5x through the
economic cycle," the rating agency said.


WW INTERNATIONAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms 'B+' ICR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on WW International Inc.
(WW) to stable from negative and affirmed its 'B+' issuer credit
rating.

WW kicked off a successful 2020 winter recruitment campaign with
double-digit-subscription growth. Additionally, the company managed
to preserve credit metrics during a difficult 2019 by improving
retention rates and prepaying debt.

As a result, the company ended 2019 with leverage in the low-4x
area, which S&P expects it to improve into the mid- to high-3x area
by the end of 2020.

S&P raised its issue-level rating on the company's first-lien
credit facility to 'BB' from 'BB-', and revised the recovery rating
to '1'(rounded estimate: 95%). S&P also raised its issue-level
rating on the company's unsecured notes to 'B+' from 'B', and
revised the recovery rating to '4' (rounded estimate: 30%). The
actions reflect lower debt balances at the time of S&P's simulated
default scenario following debt prepayments in 2019.

The outlook revision to stable reflects WW's successful winter
recruitment and better-than-expected performance in 2019. WW's
performance is highly dependent on its winter-recruitment efforts,
and with most of the season under its belt and more than 5 million
subscribers, S&P now expects 2020 to be a good year with
double-digits revenue and earnings growth, and leverage improving
to the mid- to high-3x area by the end of the year. Although 2019
was a challenging year for the company, where its revenue declined
by approximately 7% and adjusted EBITDA declined by about 18% from
2018; its credit metric's deterioration was much milder than S&P
expected because the company prepaid its debt with free operating
cash flow (FOCF). As a result, the company ended 2019 with leverage
in the low-4x area, compared to S&P's previous expectation in the
high-4x area.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that the company will
continue its growth momentum and improve its debt-to-EBITDA
leverage to the high-3x by the end of 2020 from the current low-4x
area. The rating agency expects leverage to improve due to a
combination of EBITDA expansion and debt reduction.

"We could lower our ratings if the company's operational
performance deteriorates because of a tougher competitive
environment, a worse than expected corona virus outbreak, or an
unexpected economic downturn resulting in membership declines or
higher cancellations, resulting in leverage exceeding 5x and
significantly weakening the company's cash flow generation. We
estimate this could occur if EBITDA declines 15% from current
levels, while debt remains constant. In addition, we could lower
our ratings if the company's financial policy becomes more
aggressive either in the form of debt-funded shareholder payments
or acquisitions. We estimate that about $300 million of incremental
debt at current EBITDA levels would likely result in leverage
exceeding this threshold," S&P said.

"While unlikely over the next year, we could raise our ratings if
the company is able to demonstrate a stable membership base and
margins such that its leverage improves to the low-3x area and
sustains it at that level. We estimate EBITDA would need to improve
by 35% from current levels for this to occur. We would need to be
confident in the company's ability and commitment to maintaining
leverage at these levels through prudent financial policy and
consistent operating performance," the rating agency said.


ZDN INC: Files Amended Cash Collateral Motion
---------------------------------------------
ZDN Inc. DBA Blackjack Pizza files an amended motion seeking
permission from the Bankruptcy Court to use cash collateral to pay
the necessary operating expenses of its business, on an interim
basis until final hearing on the use of cash collateral, and over
six months from the date of the final hearing.

As adequate protection for the use of cash collateral, the Debtor
proposes to provide Independence Bank, and Rapid Finance a
replacement lien on all post-petition accounts and cash equivalents
to the extent that the use of the cash collateral results in a
decrease in the value of the collateral pursuant to Section 361(2)
of the Bankruptcy Code.  
Independence Bank, and Rapid Finance may have a secured lien
position on the Debtor's funds and revenues that constitute cash
collateral.  The Debtor owes Independence Bank approximately
$132,129 and Rapid Finance approximately $117,025.  Both loans are
secured by a lien in substantially all of the Debtor's assets.

A copy of the amended motion is available at  https://is.gd/SIeg4g
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                       About ZDN Inc.

ZDN Inc., DBA BlackJack Pizza, owns and operates a pizza store in
Firestone Colorado.  The company filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Col. Case No. 20-10887) on February 10, 2020.   Holland
Law Office P.C. represents the Debtor as counsel.  



[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from February 24 to 28, 2020
-----------------------------------------------------------

  Company                    Ticker  Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                    ------  ------ ---------   --------
24 Hour Fitness
  Worldwide Inc              HRFITW   8.000    49.741   6/1/2022
24 Hour Fitness
  Worldwide Inc              HRFITW   8.000    49.922   6/1/2022
Amgen Inc                    AMGN     1.850   100.620  8/19/2021
Approach Resources Inc       AREX     7.000     1.863  6/15/2021
AvalonBay Communities Inc    AVB      3.950   101.218  1/15/2021
BPZ Resources Inc            BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2049
Bon-Ton Department
  Stores Inc/The             BONT     8.000    10.000  6/15/2021
Bristow Group Inc            BRS      6.250     5.741 10/15/2022
Bristow Group Inc            BRS      4.500     5.750   6/1/2023
Buffalo Thunder
  Development Authority      BUFLO   11.000    50.285  12/9/2022
CIT Group Inc                CIT      4.125     9.503 11/13/2029
Calfrac Holdings LP          CFWCN    8.500    26.552  6/15/2026
Calfrac Holdings LP          CFWCN    8.500    27.703  6/15/2026
California Resources Corp    CRC      8.000    22.424 12/15/2022
California Resources Corp    CRC      5.500    36.292  9/15/2021
California Resources Corp    CRC      6.000    20.045 11/15/2024
California Resources Corp    CRC      8.000    22.620 12/15/2022
California Resources Corp    CRC      6.000    19.589 11/15/2024
Chaparral Energy Inc         CHAP     8.750    26.328  7/15/2023
Chaparral Energy Inc         CHAP     8.750    26.285  7/15/2023
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      6.625    87.559  8/15/2020
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      4.875    50.873  4/15/2022
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      6.125    68.000  2/15/2021
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      8.000    30.340  1/15/2025
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      5.750    42.716  3/15/2023
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      8.000    26.114  3/15/2026
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      8.000    17.555  3/15/2026
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      8.000    31.993  1/15/2025
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      8.000    26.227  3/15/2026
Chesapeake Energy Corp       CHK      8.000    31.993  1/15/2025
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority      CHUKCH   9.750    49.595  5/30/2020
Continental Airlines
  1999-2 Class A-1
  Pass Through Trust         UAL      7.256    98.388  3/15/2020
Continental Airlines
  1999-2 Class A-1
  Pass Through Trust         UAL      6.236    98.637  3/15/2020
DFC Finance Corp             DLLR    10.500    67.125  6/15/2020
DFC Finance Corp             DLLR    10.500    67.125  6/15/2020
Dean Foods Co                DF       6.500    12.500  3/15/2023
Dean Foods Co                DF       6.500    19.750  3/15/2023
Denbury Resources Inc        DNR      6.375    65.586  8/15/2021
Dow Chemical Co/The          DOW      3.000   103.187 11/15/2022
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   9.375     2.750   5/1/2024
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   8.000     2.000  2/15/2025
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   7.750     0.165   9/1/2022
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   9.375     2.281   5/1/2024
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   7.750     0.165   9/1/2022
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   8.000     1.808  2/15/2025
EP Energy LLC / Everest
  Acquisition Finance Inc    EPENEG   7.750     0.165   9/1/2022
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc                ENER     3.000     7.875  6/15/2013
Exela Intermediate LLC /
  Exela Finance Inc          EXLINT  10.000    32.748  7/15/2023
Exela Intermediate LLC /
  Exela Finance Inc          EXLINT  10.000    33.237  7/15/2023
Extraction Oil & Gas Inc     XOG      7.375    34.945  5/15/2024
Extraction Oil & Gas Inc     XOG      7.375    36.498  5/15/2024
Federal Farm Credit
  Banks Funding Corp         FFCB     2.300    99.460 11/16/2026
Federal Farm Credit
  Banks Funding Corp         FFCB     2.340    99.478 10/13/2027
Federal Farm Credit
  Banks Funding Corp         FFCB     1.940    99.883   6/3/2024
Federal Farm Credit
  Banks Funding Corp         FFCB     2.320    99.425  9/22/2027
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     2.650    99.724  8/20/2029
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     3.250    99.864  8/15/2044
Federal Home Loan Banks      FHLB     2.200    99.865   3/3/2025
Federal Home Loan
  Mortgage Corp              FHLMC    1.800    99.876   6/3/2022
Ferrellgas Partners LP /
  Ferrellgas Partners
  Finance Corp               FGP      8.625    38.781  6/15/2020
Ferrellgas Partners LP /
  Ferrellgas Partners
  Finance Corp               FGP      8.625    47.436  6/15/2020
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc    FLTW    14.000     3.557 12/15/2011
Foresight Energy LLC /
  Foresight Energy
  Finance Corp               FELP    11.500     2.563   4/1/2023
Foresight Energy LLC /
  Foresight Energy
  Finance Corp               FELP    11.500     2.875   4/1/2023
Fresh Market Inc/The         TFM      9.750    46.243   5/1/2023
Fresh Market Inc/The         TFM      9.750    47.304   5/1/2023
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR     10.500    45.756  9/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      8.500    50.788  4/15/2020
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      7.125    46.467  1/15/2023
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      6.250    45.542  9/15/2021
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      8.750    46.066  4/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      9.250    45.598   7/1/2021
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR      8.875    46.584  9/15/2020
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR     10.500    45.508  9/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp        FTR     10.500    45.508  9/15/2022
Global Eagle
  Entertainment Inc          ENT      2.750    40.016  2/15/2035
Gogo Inc                     GOGO     3.750    99.000   3/1/2020
Goodman Networks Inc         GOODNT   8.000    48.500  5/11/2022
Grizzly Energy LLC           VNR      9.000     6.000  2/15/2024
Grizzly Energy LLC           VNR      9.000     6.000  2/15/2024
Hi-Crush Inc                 HCR      9.500    33.000   8/1/2026
Hi-Crush Inc                 HCR      9.500    32.650   8/1/2026
High Ridge Brands Co         HIRIDG   8.875     2.250  3/15/2025
High Ridge Brands Co         HIRIDG   8.875     1.750  3/15/2025
Hornbeck Offshore
  Services Inc               HOSS     5.000    37.362   3/1/2021
International Business
  Machines Corp              IBM      2.800   101.449  5/13/2021
International Business
  Machines Corp              IBM      2.250   100.486  2/19/2021
International Business
  Machines Corp              IBM      2.900   102.134  11/1/2021
International
  Wire Group Inc             ITWG    10.750    95.887   8/1/2021
Johnson Controls Inc         JCI      5.000    96.452  3/30/2020
Jonah Energy LLC / Jonah
  Energy Finance Corp        JONAHE   7.250    28.000 10/15/2025
Jonah Energy LLC / Jonah
  Energy Finance Corp        JONAHE   7.250    20.019 10/15/2025
Kimberly-Clark Corp          KMB      1.850    99.690   3/1/2020
Liberty Media Corp           LMCA     2.250    57.875  9/30/2046
Liberty Property LP          LPT      4.400   109.950  2/15/2024
Liberty Property LP          LPT      4.125   104.773  6/15/2022
MAI Holdings Inc             MAIHLD   9.500    20.202   6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc             MAIHLD   9.500    20.202   6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc             MAIHLD   9.500    20.202   6/1/2023
MF Global Holdings Ltd       MF       9.000    15.607  6/20/2038
MF Global Holdings Ltd       MF       6.750    15.625   8/8/2016
Mashantucket Western
  Pequot Tribe               MASHTU   7.350    16.000   7/1/2026
McDermott Technology
  Americas Inc / McDermott
  Technology US Inc          MDR     10.625    13.875   5/1/2024
McDermott Technology
  Americas Inc / McDermott
  Technology US Inc          MDR     10.625    13.130   5/1/2024
Morgan Stanley               MS       4.101    99.511   3/1/2020
Murray Energy Corp           MURREN  12.000     0.698  4/15/2024
Murray Energy Corp           MURREN  12.000     0.698  4/15/2024
NWH Escrow Corp              HARDWD   7.500    53.043   8/1/2021
NWH Escrow Corp              HARDWD   7.500    53.043   8/1/2021
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG              NMG      8.000    29.448 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG              NMG      8.750    32.225 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG              NMG      8.000    30.714 10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group
  LTD LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG              NMG      8.750    32.775 10/25/2024
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp            NGREFN  12.250     3.914  5/15/2019
Northwest Hardwoods Inc       HARDWD   7.500    45.000   8/1/2021
Northwest Hardwoods Inc       HARDWD   7.500    49.832   8/1/2021
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC          OMX      5.540     0.573  1/29/2020
Optimas OE Solutions
  Holding LLC / Optimas OE
  Solutions Inc               OPTOES   8.625    59.994   6/1/2021
Optimas OE Solutions
  Holding LLC / Optimas OE
  Solutions Inc               OPTOES   8.625    59.994   6/1/2021
PDC Energy Inc                PDCE     6.250    96.177  12/1/2025
Pioneer Energy
  Services Corp               PESX     6.125    24.969  3/15/2022
Powerwave Technologies Inc    PWAV     1.875     0.019 11/15/2024
Pyxus International Inc       PYX      9.875    37.242  7/15/2021
Pyxus International Inc       PYX      9.875    54.000  7/15/2021
Pyxus International Inc       PYX      9.875    37.565  7/15/2021
Renco Metals Inc              RENCO   11.500    24.875   7/1/2003
Rolta LLC                     RLTAIN  10.750     9.000  5/16/2018
SCANA Corp                    D        4.750   102.520  5/15/2021
SCANA Corp                    D        4.125   103.521   2/1/2022
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp                AMEPER   7.375    14.250  11/1/2021
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp                AMEPER   7.125    14.000  11/1/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp                AMEPER   7.125    14.000  11/1/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp                AMEPER   7.375    14.250  11/1/2021
Sanchez Energy Corp           SNEC     6.125     3.750  1/15/2023
Sanchez Energy Corp           SNEC     7.750     3.750  6/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc          SD       7.500     0.500  2/15/2023
Sears Holdings Corp           SHLD     8.000     1.990 12/15/2019
Sears Holdings Corp           SHLD     6.625     5.967 10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp           SHLD     6.625     6.347 10/15/2018
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp             SHLD     6.500     0.965  12/1/2028
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp             SHLD     7.500     1.069 10/15/2027
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp             SHLD     7.000     1.007   6/1/2032
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp             SHLD     6.750     0.761  1/15/2028
Sempra Texas Holdings Corp    TXU      5.550    13.500 11/15/2014
Stearns Holdings LLC          STELND   9.375    45.411  8/15/2020
Stearns Holdings LLC          STELND   9.375    45.411  8/15/2020
Summit Midstream Partners LP  SMLP     9.500    51.563       N/A
Tapstone Energy LLC /
  Tapstone Energy
  Finance Corp                TAPENE   9.750     0.812   6/1/2022
Tapstone Energy LLC /
  Tapstone Energy
  Finance Corp                TAPENE   9.750     0.812   6/1/2022
Techniplas LLC                TECPLS  10.000    70.125   5/1/2020
Techniplas LLC                TECPLS  10.000    69.896   5/1/2020
Teligent Inc/NJ               TLGT     4.750    35.623   5/1/2023
TerraVia Holdings Inc         TVIA     5.000     4.644  10/1/2019
TerraVia Holdings Inc         TVIA     6.000     4.644   2/1/2018
Tesla Energy
  Operations Inc/DE           TSLAEN   3.600    98.435  3/19/2020
Tesla Energy
  Operations Inc/DE           TSLAEN   3.600    93.297  3/26/2020
Tesla Energy
  Operations Inc/DE           TSLAEN   3.600    92.013  4/23/2020
Transworld Systems Inc        TSIACQ   9.500    25.455  8/15/2021
Transworld Systems Inc        TSIACQ   9.500    25.455  8/15/2021
UCI International LLC         UCII     8.625     4.780  2/15/2019
Ultra Resources Inc/US        UPL      6.875    10.750  4/15/2022
Ultra Resources Inc/US        UPL      7.125     6.732  4/15/2025
Ultra Resources Inc/US        UPL      6.875    10.180  4/15/2022
Ultra Resources Inc/US        UPL      7.125     6.975  4/15/2025
Unit Corp                     UNTUS    6.625    39.307  5/15/2021
United Technologies Corp      UTX      2.342   100.005  8/16/2021
United Technologies Corp      UTX      1.150   103.949  5/18/2024
United Technologies Corp      UTX      1.875   109.182  2/22/2026
VF Corp                       VFC      3.500   102.298   9/1/2021
VIVUS Inc                     VVUS     4.500    90.670   5/1/2020
Vine Oil & Gas LP /
  Vine Oil & Gas
  Finance Corp                VRI      9.750    48.990  4/15/2023
Vine Oil & Gas LP /
  Vine Oil & Gas
  Finance Corp                VRI      9.750    46.890  4/15/2023
Whiting Petroleum Corp        WLL      5.750    55.443  3/15/2021
Whiting Petroleum Corp        WLL      1.250    90.077   4/1/2020
Whiting Petroleum Corp        WLL      6.250    44.260   4/1/2023
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      9.000    12.438  6/30/2025
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN     10.500    12.750  6/30/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      7.500    26.000   6/1/2022
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      9.000    12.117  6/30/2025
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      8.750     6.250 12/15/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      6.375     6.000   8/1/2023
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN     10.500     6.918  6/30/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      6.375     4.929   8/1/2023
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      8.750     5.968 12/15/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp     WIN      7.750     6.014  10/1/2021
rue21 inc                     RUE      9.000     1.305 10/15/2021



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***