/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/200107.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, January 7, 2020, Vol. 24, No. 6

                            Headlines

2178 ATLANTIC AVE: Seeks to Hire Kramer Levin as Legal Counsel
537 HOLDING: Hires Petroff Amshen as Counsel
80 FLINTLOCK LANE: Seeks to Hire Abbasi Law as Legal Counsel
ABC SOUTH: Jan. 24, 2020 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
ABILITY INC: Changes Reporting Format Following Nasdaq Delisting

ACOSTA INC: Completes Financial Reorganization, Exits Chapter 11
ACTT RIVER: Unsecured Creditors to Get At Least 50% in Plan
ARISTA IMAGING: Gets Interim OK to Hire GlassRatner, Appoint CRO
ARSENAL RESOURCES: Says Lone Plan Objection Has No Merit
ARSENAL RESOURCES: TCO Gets $750K Cash, $28M L/C for $476M Claims

ASHBY TOWNHOMES: Quilling Selander Approved as General Counsel
BANTEK INC: Delays Form 10-K for Year Ended Sept. 30
BETTEROADS ASPHALT: Bankr. Court Denies Stay Motion Pending Appeal
BODY BY PASTRAMI: Has Until May 4, 2020 to File Plan & Disclosures
BORDEN DAIRY: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors

CAMBER ENERGY: Closes Preferred Stock Redemption Agreement
CARET CORPORATION: Hires Capital Recovery as Auctioneer
CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS: HealthCor et al. Own 29.2% as of Dec. 31
CBAK ENERGY: Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Bid Price Requirement
CENTRAL PROCESSING: Court Slashes Professional Fees

CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 22
CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES: Jan. 22 Common Stock Transfer Hearing Set
CONSTELLIS HOLDINGS: Moody's Lowers CFR to Ca, Outlook Negative
CORAL REEF: Seeks to Hire Schafer and Weiner as counsel
CORALREEF PRODUCTIONS: Gets DIP Loan by Charging Insider’s Card

CREATIVE GLOBAL: May Borrow from CEO on Unsecured Basis
CREATIVE REALITIES: Secures $2-Mil. Special Loan from Slipstream
CTI INDUSTRIES: Inks $5M Stock Purchase Deal with LF International
CUKER INTERACTIVE: Taps Squar Milner as Accountant
DEAN FOODS: Seeks to Hire Davis Polk as Attorney

DESERT LAND: Trustee Hires Colliers, Keen-Summit, as Brokers
DIJA HOLDINGS: Unsecureds to Get 100% With Interest in 15 Years
ECOCAST INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
ED3 CONSULTANTS: Seeks to Hire Smart Business as Consultant
EDUCATION CORPORATION: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Unsecureds to Have 15% Recovery Over 5 Years
EMERGE ENERGY: Hires PricewaterhouseCoopers as Tax Advisors
F & T SPIRITS: Hires Middlebrooks Shapiro as Counsel
FENCEPOST PRODUCTIONS: Hires McDowell Rice as Legal Counsel
FOX SUBACUTE: Hires Isdaner & Company as Accountant

FRESH ALTERNATIVES: Feb. 5, 2020 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
GAC VENTURES: Seeks to Hire Cohen & Krol as Legal Counsel
GALVESTON BAY PROPERTIES: Okin Adams Approved as Co-Counsel
GENERATION NEXT: Seeks to Hire Signature Analytics as Accountant
GENERATION NEXT: Seeks Up to $2.535M of DIP Loan, Gets Interim OK

GENERATION NEXT: U.S. Trustee Objects to DIP Motion
GRABAH PRETZEL: Court Confirms Plan of Reorganization
GRANITE VALLEY GRANDE: Crow & Dunlevy Tapped as Bankr. Counsel
GULLIVER'S GATE: Gabriel Del Virginia Tapped as Counsel
HUDDLESTON VENTURES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

HUDSON TECHNOLOGIES: Appoints Chief Restructuring Officer
ION GEOPHYSICAL: CFO Steve Bate Will Retire Next Month
JM GRAIN: Unsecureds Owed $8.9M to Recover $100K in Plan
JUNO USA: Seeks to Hire Chipman Brown as Counsel
K3D PROPERTY: Seeks to Hire Farinash & Stofan as Legal Counsel

LAJ CONSTRUCTION: Mark J. Hannon Approved as Bankruptcy Attorney
LAJ CONSTRUCTION: Seeks to Hire Singh & McClean as Accountant
LONE STAR BREWERY: Case Summary & 11 Unsecured Creditors
LUCKY BUMS SUBSIDIARY: Hires Gravis Law as Special Counsel
MAGNOLIA LANE: Seeks to Hire Florida Property as Manager

MANOMAY LLC: Seeks to Hire Blackwell Law as Special Counsel
MARRONE BIO: Ospraie Entities Report 43.8% Stake as of Dec. 30
MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING: Michael W. Carmel Approved as Counsel
MILLMAC CORPORATION: Seeks to Hire Stichter Riedel as Counsel
MODERN POULTRY: Has Until Feb. 28, 2020 to Achieve Confirmation

MORGAN ADMINISTRATION: Court Nixes Counsel's Meal Expense
NEWSCO INTERNATIONAL: Hires Clark Hill as Bankruptcy Counsel
NORVIEW BUILDERS: Jan. 21, 2020 Plan & Confirmation Hearing Set
NOS INC: Jan. 23, 2020 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
NOSCE TE: Villarreal Backs Plan Filing Extension

O-I GLASS: Business as Usual While Paddock in Chapter 11
PADDOCK ENTERPRISES: In Chapter 11 to Address Asbestos Claims
PADDOCK ENTERPRISES: Mulls Sec. 524(g) Trust for Asbestos Claims
PADDOCK ENTERPRISES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
PAPS CAB: Seeks to Hire Alla Kachan P.C. as Attorney

PAPS CAB: Seeks to Hire Wisdom Professional as Accountant
PLUS THERAPEUTICS: Appoints Dr. An van Es-Johansson to Board
POLYLAST SYSTEMS: Hires Allan D. NewDelman as Bankruptcy Attorney
PORTERS NECK: Has Until Jan. 17, 2020 to File Plan & Disclosures
PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Receives Noncompliance Notice from Nasdaq

RAMBUTAN THAI: Grobstein Teeple Approved as Accountants
RONNA'S RUFF: Seeks to Hire Quinn Buseck as Attorney
ROYAL TRANSPORT EXPRESS: Hires Eric A. Liepins as its Counsel
SAFE HARBOR: Court OKs $332,500 DIP Loan from Velocity Mortgage
SAVE MONEY: Seeks to Hire Merlin Law Group as Special Counsel

SCOSA PROPERTIES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
SEPCO CORPORATION: To Seek Plan Confirmation March 23
SMARTSCIENCE LABORATORIES: Taps GlassRatner as Forensic Accountant
SPOILED SWEET DESIGNS: Seeks to Hire Wampler & Pierce as Counsel
SUMMIT TERMINAL: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor

SUNNY OPTICS: Seeks to Hire Goe & Forsythe as Legal Counsel
TARONIS TECHNOLOGIES: Sabby Volatility No Longer a Shareholder
TAYLOR VILLAS: Jana S. Whitworth Okayed as Bankruptcy Counsel
THINK FINANCE: Court Confirms Second Modified First Amended Plan
TOWN SPORTS: Atlas Funds' Peter Walsh Owns 29.6% of Shares

TOWN SPORTS: HG Vora Sells Entire Stake to Atlas Fund II
TRULY FIT: Court Confirms Plan of Reorganization
VALLEY ECONOMIC: Seeks to Hire Linzer Law as Special Counsel
VALLEY VIEW: Employs Johnson & Gubler as Counsel
VASCULAR ACCESS: Seeks Court Approval to Hire Business Consultant

VECTOR LAUNCH: Seeks DIP Loan from Bridge Lender, Wins Interim OK
VILLAGE APOTHECARY: Silverman & Morris' Reduced Fees Okayed
WALKER ENVIRONMENTAL: Seeks to Hire Hood & Bolen as Legal Counsel
WALKER INVESTMENT: Seeks to Hire Hood & Bolen as Legal Counsel
ZACKY & SONS: Hires Pearson Realty as Broker

[*] Fundamental Sells The Clare in Chicago to LCS

                            *********

2178 ATLANTIC AVE: Seeks to Hire Kramer Levin as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
2178 Atlantic Ave HDFC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire  Kramer Levin
Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its legal counsel on a pro bono basis.

Kramer Levin will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:

     a. administration of the case and the exercise of oversight
with respect to the Debtor's affairs;

     b. preparation of legal papers;

     c. appearances in court, participation in litigation and
representation at the meeting of creditors;

     d. negotiation of any potential financing;

     e. negotiation and formulation of a plan of reorganization;

     f. investigation of prior transactions and causes of action
concerning the Debtor that may be relevant to its case;

     g. negotiations concerning the use of the Debtor's assets;
and

     h. communications with creditors.

Douglas Mannal, Esq., a partner at Kramer Levin, disclosed in court
filings that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined by
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The counsel can be reached at:

     Douglas H. Mannal, Esq.
     Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
     1177 Avenue of the Americas
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: (212) 715-9100
     Fax: (212) 715-8000

                    About 2178 Atlantic Ave HDFC

Based in Brooklyn, N.Y., 2178 Atlantic Ave HDFC filed a voluntary
petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 19-47287) on Dec. 4, 2019, listing under $1 million in
both assets and liabilities.


537 HOLDING: Hires Petroff Amshen as Counsel
--------------------------------------------
537 Holding Inc. seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of New York to employ and retain Petroff
Amshen LLP as its counsel.

The Debtor is in business of owning a certain property known as 537
Hart Street, Brooklyn, New York 1122. The Property is the subject
of a foreclosure action pending in the Supreme Court of the State
of New York.

During the course of this Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the Debtor intends
to resolve the alleged outstanding lien recoded against the
Property.

The Debtor desires to retain Petroff Amshen as its counsel to:

     (a) Analyze the Debtor's financial situation, and render
advice to the Debtor in determining whether to file a petition in
bankruptcy;

     (b) Prepare and file any petition, schedules, statement of
affairs, disclosure statement and plan which may be required;

     (c) Counsel the Debtor with regard to the Debtor's rights and
obligations as a Debtor in Possession;

     (d) Represent the Debtor at the meeting of creditors and
confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

     (e) Assist the Debtor in administering the Debtor's Chapter 11
case;

     (f) Make such motions or taking such action as may be
appropriate or necessary under the Bankruptcy Code;

     (g) Take steps as may be necessary for the Debtor to marshal
and protect the estate's assets;

     (h) Negotiate with the Debtor's creditors in formulating a
plan of reorganization for the Debtor in this case;

     (i) Draft and prosecute the confirmation of the Debtor's plan
of reorganization in this case; and

     (j) Render additional services as the Debtor may require in
this case.

The Debtor retained Petroff Amshen for the legal services on an
hourly basis, as follows:

     $375.00 per hour for attorneys, and
     $150.00 per hour for clerks and paraprofessionals.

Petroff Amshen has received a payment of $10,000.00 representing a
portion of the $25,000.00 retainer fee as provided in the parties'
retainer agreement, together with the sum of $1,717.00 as and for
the filing fee due to the Court in this case.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge and as reflected in the
Declaration of Steven Amshen, Esq., Petroff Amshen does not have
any connection with the Debtor, its creditors or any other party in
interest or their attorneys. Accordingly, the Debtor believes
Petroff Amshen is disinterested and does not hold or represent and
interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm may be reached at:

     Steven Amshen, Esq.
     PETROFF AMSHEN LLP
     1795 Coney Island Avenue Suite 3
     Brooklyn, NY 11230
     Tel: (718) 336-4200

                        About 537 Holding

537 Holding Inc. is in business of owning a certain property known
as 537 Hart Street, Brooklyn, New York 1122.

537 Holding Inc. is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined
in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
N.Y. Case No. 19-46965) on November 20, 2019.  The Hon. Carla E.
Craig oversees the case.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The petition
was signed by Ilan Avitsedek, officer.

The Debtor is represented by Steven Amshen, Esq., at Petroff Amshen
LLP.



80 FLINTLOCK LANE: Seeks to Hire Abbasi Law as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
80 Flintlock Lane, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to hire Abbasi Law
Corporation as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:

     a. represent the Debtor at the initial interview;

     b. represent the Debtor at the meeting of creditors;

     c. represent the Debtor at all hearings before the bankruptcy
court;

     d. prepare legal papers;

     e. advise the Debtor regarding matters of bankruptcy law,
including the Debtor's rights and remedies with respect to its
assets and claims of creditors;

     f. represent the Debtor in all contested matters;

     g. prepare a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization;

     h. analyze secured, priority or general unsecured claims that
have been filed in the Debtor's bankruptcy case;

     i. negotiate with the Debtor's secured and unsecured creditors
regarding the amount and payment of their claims;

     j. object to claims as may be appropriate;

     k. perform all other legal services other than adversary
proceedings which would require a further written agreement;

     l. advise the Debtor of its powers and duties in the continued
operation of its business; and

     m. provide advice on general corporate, securities, real
estate, litigation, environmental, state regulatory, and other
legal matters which may arise during the pendency of the case.

Abbasi Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys              $350
     Paralegals              $60
     Law Clerk               $25

Prior to its bankruptcy filing, the Debtor paid Abbasi Law a
retainer of $7,500, plus $1,717 for the filing fee.  The firm also
be reimbursed for work-related expenses incurred.

Matthew Abbasi, Esq., a partner at Abbasi Law, assured the court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Abbasi Law can be reached at:

     Matthew Abbasi, Esq.
     Abbasi Law Corporation
     8889 West Olympic Blvd., Suite 240
     Beverly Hills, CA 90211
     Tel: (310) 358-9341
     Fax: (888) 709-5448
     Email: matthew@malawgroup.com

                     About 80 Flintlock Lane

Based in Calabasas, Calif., 80 Flintlock Lane, LLC filed a
voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12651) on Oct. 21, 2019, listing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  Matthew Abbasi, Esq., at
Abbasi Law Corporation, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


ABC SOUTH: Jan. 24, 2020 Plan & Disclosures Hearing Set
-------------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 16, 2019, debtor ABC South Consulting and Construction,
L.L.C., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana an Amended Disclosure Statement and an
Amended Plan of Reorganization.

On Dec. 17, 2019, Judge Jerry A. Brown conditionally approved the
disclosure statement and established the following dates and
deadlines:

   * Jan. 24, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. at Courtroom 705, Hale Boggs
Federal Building, 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana is the
hearing to consider final approval of the Disclosure Statement and
confirmation of the Amended Plan.

   * Jan. 17, 2020, is fixed as the last day to file and serve
written objections to both the Amended Disclosure Statement in
accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 3017.1 and confirmation of the
Amended Plan in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 3020.

   * Jan. 17, 2020, is the deadline for ballots indicating
acceptance or rejection of the Amended Plan in accordance with
Bankruptcy Rule 3018 to be delivered or mailed to the Debtor's
counsel.

A full-text copy of the Conditional Order is available at
https://tinyurl.com/wn8e2jk from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       Evan Park Howell, III
       1 Galleria Boulevard, Suite 1900
       Metairie, LA 70001
       Phone: (504) 343-4346

                 About ABC South Consulting

ABC South Consulting and Construction, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case
No.19-11650) on June 19, 2019. At the time of the filing, the
Debtor was estimated to have assets of less than $1 million and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  Evan Park Howell III, Esq., is
the Debtor's bankruptcy attorney.


ABILITY INC: Changes Reporting Format Following Nasdaq Delisting
----------------------------------------------------------------
Ability Inc. published on Jan. 1, 2020, an immediate report in
Israel reporting that following the delisting of its ordinary
shares from the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Company changed its
reporting format in Israel such that its immediate reports will be
reported in accordance with Chapter 6 of the Israeli Securities
Law, 1968, while its periodic reporting in Israel for six months
following the delisting from Nasdaq will be in accordance with
Chapter 5C of the Israeli Securities Law, as permitted by Section
36(a2) of the Israeli Securities Law.

                       About Ability Inc.

Ability Inc. is the sole owner of Ability Computer & Software
Industries Ltd. "ACSI" and Ability Security Systems Ltd.
Headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, ACSI was founded in 1994,
offering and providing advanced interception, geolocation for
cellular and satellite communication and cyber intelligence tools
used worldwide by Security and Intelligence Agencies, Military
forces, Law Enforcement Agencies and Homeland Security Agencies.
ACSI offers a broad range of lawful interception, decryption, cyber
and geolocation solutions for cellular and satellite
communication.

Ability reported a net and comprehensive loss of $10.19 million in
2018, a net and comprehensive loss of $9.11 million in 2017, and a
net and comprehensive loss of $8.05 million in 2016.

Ziv Haft, in Tel Aviv, Israel, a BDO Member Firm, the Company's
auditor since 2015, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated April 24, 2019, on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2019, citing that the
Company has an accumulated deficit, suffered recurring losses and
has negative operating cash flow.  Additionally, the Company is
under an investigation of the Israeli Ministry of Defense, which
ordered a suspension of certain export licenses.  These matters,
along with other reasons, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


ACOSTA INC: Completes Financial Reorganization, Exits Chapter 11
----------------------------------------------------------------
Acosta, Inc., a full-service sales and marketing agency, on Jan. 2,
2020, disclosed that it has successfully completed its financial
reorganization and recapitalization and emerged from Chapter 11
less than a month after filing.  Through the process, Acosta
eliminated all of its approximately $3 billion of long-term debt,
and its new investors have funded $325 million in new equity
capital.

The reorganized Company's largest shareholders include funds
associated with Elliott Management, Oaktree Capital Management,
L.P., Davidson Kempner, and Nexus Capital Management.  The investor
group is composed of funds that manage nearly $200 billion and have
made a strategic decision to capitalize the business with the new
equity capital and zero funded debt.

Acosta's new equity owners and investors recognize the long-term
value the Company can create for its clients and customers and
share Acosta's interest in driving the growth and value of the
Acosta enterprise and brand.  A newly reconstituted Board of
Directors will be comprised of Acosta's CEO Darian Pickett,
representatives from the new ownership group and other premier
industry experts.

"We are starting this new year by launching an exciting new chapter
for Acosta and our key stakeholders," said Darian Pickett, CEO of
Acosta.  "We are pleased that we have completed this process as
quickly and efficiently as possible.  We sincerely thank all of our
employees, clients, customers and other business partners for their
continued commitment to Acosta. We now have the strongest balance
sheet in the industry.  Looking ahead, our focus remains on working
hard and delivering innovative advancements and industry-leading
solutions in order to be the strongest possible partner for our
clients and customers.  As we embark into the future as a stronger
Acosta, we will continue to build on our successes, while upholding
our core values of integrity and trust, to better serve our clients
and customers for years to come."

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is acting as legal counsel for the Company,
PJT Partners, Inc. as financial advisor, and Alvarez & Marsal as
restructuring advisor.  White & Case LLP is acting as legal counsel
for certain supporting creditors.  Sullivan & Cromwell LLP is
acting as legal counsel for certain other supporting creditors.
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP is acting as legal counsel for a
minority group of first lien lenders.  Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is
acting as legal counsel for an ad hoc group of lenders and
Centerview Partners is acting as financial advisor.

                          About Acosta

Acosta Inc. -- http://www.acosta.com/-- provides a range of
outsourced sales, marketing and retail merchandising services
throughout the U.S., Canada and Europe. For 90 years, Acosta has
led the industry in helping consumer packaged goods companies move
products off shelves and into shoppers' baskets.

Acosta and its lenders have agreed to implement the restructuring
through the "pre-packaged" Plan.  Accordingly, Acosta and its U.S.
affiliates intend to file voluntary Chapter 11 petitions.  Acosta's
non-U.S. subsidiaries and affiliates are not expected to be
included in the upcoming filing or affected by the Chapter 11
process. Having already received support for the Plan from a
supermajority of both its lenders and noteholders, the Company
expects to complete the restructuring process quickly.

On Nov. 8, 2019, Anna Holdings, Inc. and certain of its affiliates
commenced a solicitation of votes on the Debtors' Joint Prepackaged
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization from Holders of First Lien Claims
and Holders of Senior Notes Claims (as defined in the Plan). Anna
Holdings, Inc. is the parent company of Acosta.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is acting as legal counsel for the Company,
PJT Partners, Inc. as financial advisor, and Alvarez & Marsal as
restructuring advisor. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is acting as legal
counsel for an ad hoc group of lenders and Centerview Partners is
acting as financial advisor. White & Case LLP is acting as legal
counsel for certain supporting creditors.  Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
is acting as legal counsel for certain other supporting creditors.
Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.


ACTT RIVER: Unsecured Creditors to Get At Least 50% in Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor ACTT River Road LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania a First Amended Disclosure
Statement describing its Amended Plan of Reorganization.

The holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims shall receive the
greater of the following: (a) the sum of $2,500 distributed on a
pro rata basis on the Amended Plan Maturity Date; or (b) pro rata
distribution up to 100% of the holder's stated Allowed General
Claim derived from net proceeds generated upon the sale of the
Property.

All existing membership interests shall be retained but the holders
shall not receive any distribution on account of the interest in
the Debtor until Classes 2 and 3 have been paid in full. Carolyn
Kroll, the direct and indirect holder of the existing Interest, has
agreed to become the Amended Plan Funder contributing money to the
Debtor's Amended Plan obligations.

It is estimated that Unsecured Creditors will receive a minimum of
50% of their Allowed Claims on or before the Amended Plan Maturity
Date.

The property does not have any current operations.  Until such time
as the property is let and may produce income which will be
utilized towards funding the Amended Plan, the Amended Plan will be
funded on a monthly basis by the Amended Plan Funder, Carolyn
Kroll. The Amended Plan Funder's contribution will include
sufficient working capital to specifically pay all real estate
taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs associated with the
property, as well as the monthly adequate protection payments due
to Class 2 Claimant.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement and the
Amended Plan is available at https://tinyurl.com/ryyavtj from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       SILVERANG, ROSENZWEIG & HALTZMAN, LLC
       Mark S. Haltzman
       WOODLANDS CENTER
       900 East 8th Avenue, Suite 300
       King of Prussia, PA 19406
       Tel: (610) 263-0131
       Fax: (215) 754-4211

                    About ACTT River Road

ACTT River Road LLC classifies its business as single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

Based in Point Pleasant, Pa., ACTT River Road sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case
No.19-13789) on June 12, 2019. At the time of the filing, the
Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  Mark S. Haltzman, Esq., at Silverang,
Rosenzweig & Haltzman, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


ARISTA IMAGING: Gets Interim OK to Hire GlassRatner, Appoint CRO
----------------------------------------------------------------
Arista Imaging of N. Miami, LLC and Presgar Imaging of CMI North,
L.C. received interim approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to hire GlassRatner Advisory &
Capital Group, LLC and appoint the firm's principal Tom Santoro as
chief restructuring officer.

The court authorized the Debtors to pay GlassRatner and the CRO a
retainer of $25,000 for these services:

     (a) manage all aspects of the Debtors' business activities and
operations, including budgeting, cash management and finance;

     (b) assist in developing and implementing restructuring,
recapitalization or asset sale strategies;

     (c) assist in the sale or disposition of the Debtors' assets;


     (d) cause the Debtors to enter into or enforce any agreement
or contract;

     (e) manage the communications and relationships with
creditors, professionals and other third parties;

     (f) assist in preparing financial and other reporting as
required by the bankruptcy court and in connection with any
court-approved debtor-in-possession or cash collateral financing
arrangements and Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement
supporting documents, bankruptcy schedules, statements and
operating reports, and;

     (g) cause the Debtors to take any other action which the CRO,
in good faith, determines to be necessary, prudent or appropriate
under the circumstances.

The proposed compensation arrangement for Mr. Santoro and
GlassRatner are:

     a. GlassRatner will be compensated by the Debtors for the CRO
services provided by Mr. Santoro at a rate of $450 per hour.  The
services to be provided to the Debtors by GlassRatner personnel to
support the CRO in carrying out his services will be paid at the
standard rates of such personnel ranging from $135 to $315 per
hour.

     b. The compensation for the CRO services will be subject to a
monthly cap. Any fees billed by GlassRatner for a given month that
exceeds the applicable monthly cap will be treated as follows:

        -- 50 percent of the unbilled fees will be carried over and
billed in the immediately following month; and

        -- 50 percent of the unbilled fees will be permanently
written-off by GlassRatner.

     c. The monthly cap is $38,000. Effective in the month
following the six-month anniversary of the agreement, the monthly
cap will be reduced to $35,000.

     d. GlassRatner will receive reimbursement for work-related
expenses.
    
Mr. Santoro assures the court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as defined by Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Tom Santoro
     GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC
     200 East Broward Blvd., Suite 1010
     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Main: (954) 859-5074
     Mobile: (954) 612-4017
     Fax: (954) 859-5068
     Email: tsantoro@glassratner.com

                    About Arista Imaging of N. Miami

Based in Miami, Fla., Arista Imaging of N. Miami, LLC, and Presgar
Imaging of CMI North, L.C. own and operate a medical imaging
business.

Arista Imaging and  Presgar Imaging filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 19-26519) on Dec. 10, 2019,
disclosing less than $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Grace E. Robson, Esq., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


ARSENAL RESOURCES: Says Lone Plan Objection Has No Merit
--------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal Resources Development LLC and its debtor affiliates
submitted a memorandum of law in support of the request for entry
of an order confirming Joint Pre-Packaged Plan of Reorganization.  


The level of support by all Holders of Claims is not surprising
given the benefits of the Plan. The Plan fully equitizes the Term
Loan Claims and the Seller Notes Claims (representing over $361
million in funded debt), repays the OpCo RBL Claims and all OpCo
General Unsecured Claims and allows the reorganized Company to
access up to $230 million of new liquidity through the New RBL
Facility and the New Capital Commitment, both of which will be
funded on the Effective Date.

The Plan amends or terminates each of the Gathering Agreements to
which Arsenal Resources Energy LLC is a party. The Gathering
Agreements, and particularly the unmet minimum volume commitments
thereunder, were a major cause of the Chapter 11 Cases.  After
extensive and good faith negotiations prior to and during the
Chapter 11 Cases, the Debtors have now reached a deal as to each of
the Gathering Agreements that will better fit the reorganized
Company's needs.

The Plan undoubtedly achieves the purposes of chapter 11 by
providing for the continuation of the Debtors' operations on a
solid financial basis, minimizing disruption to scores of
employees, vendors and customers, and positioning the Debtors for
continued growth.

Only one party has a standing objection to the Plan, which should
be overruled.  Cleveland Equipment Co., Inc. objects because, it
argues, the Plan does not truly unimpair its mechanic's lien claim
unless it is converted into a full recourse claim after the
Effective Date, including for purposes of post-emergence
enforcement under West Virginia law.  This theory has been
expressly rejected by binding Third Circuit precedent.
Accordingly, the Cleveland Brothers Objection has no merit.

The Plan satisfies the requirements of section 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, the Debtors respectfully request that
the objection to the Plan be overruled in its entirety and the
Court confirm the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum of Law is available at
https://tinyurl.com/smjrqcg from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.    
  

The Debtors are represented by:

     YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
     Pauline K. Morgan, Esq.
     Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq.
     Ashley E. Jacobs, Esq.
     Elizabeth S. Justison, Esq.
     Rodney Square
     1000 North King Street
     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
     Tel: (302) 571-6600
     Fax: (302) 571-1253

           - and -

     SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
     Michael H. Torkin, Esq.
     Kathrine A. McLendon, Esq.
     Nicholas E. Baker, Esq.
     Edward R. Linden, Esq.
     Jamie J. Fell, Esq.
     425 Lexington Avenue
     New York, New York 10017
     Tel: (212) 455-2000
     Fax: (212) 455-2502

                    About Arsenal Resources

Arsenal Resources -- http://www.arsenalresources.com/-- is an
independent exploration and production company headquartered in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that is engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, development and production of natural gas in the
Appalachian Basin.  

Arsenal Resources Development LLC and 16 affiliates sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12347) on Nov. 8,
2019, to implement terms of a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

Arsenal was estimated to have at least $500 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Company is represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, as legal counsel, PJT Partners
LP, as investment banker and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC,
as restructuring advisor.


ARSENAL RESOURCES: TCO Gets $750K Cash, $28M L/C for $476M Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal Resources Development LLC and its Debtor Affiliates filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a First
Amended Joint Pre-packaged Plan of Reorganization, to among, other
things, provide that ARE Gathering Agreement Claims will be allowed
for $476 million, and that  Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC ("TCO")
will receive $750,000 in cash and draw upon a $28.5 million letter
of credit.

Any Allowed OpCo General Unsecured Claim, each Holder of an Allowed
OpCo General Unsecured Claim may, at the option of the Reorganized
OpCo Debtors: (i) receive Cash equal to such Allowed Claim on the
later of (x) the Effective Date, and (y) the date payment on
account of such Allowed Claim is due, (ii) receive payment on terms
as the Reorganized OpCo Debtors and the Holder thereof may agree,
(iii) have such Allowed Claim Reinstated or (iv) receive such
treatment so as to render such Allowed Claim unimpaired within the
meaning of section 1124 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Solely for purposes of the Plan, the ARE Gathering Agreement Claims
shall be Allowed in the amount of $476 million, and such ARE
Gathering Agreement Claims shall not be subject to disallowance,
setoff, recoupment, subordination, recharacterization or reduction
of any kind, including pursuant to section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The TCO Gathering Agreement Payment in the amount of $750,000, to
be paid by Reorganized ARDH1 or another Reorganized OpCo Debtor in
cash in full within 10 days of the occurrence of the Effective
Date. TCO shall be entitled to draw and retain the full amount
under the TCO L/C, and the Debtors and/or Reorganized Debtors, on
behalf of themselves and their respective Estates, waive any
Avoidance Actions which could be brought against any Person or
Entity, including TCO, in connection therewith.

TCO L/C means letter of credit no. 69603108 issued and outstanding
under the RBL Credit Agreement in the face amount of $28,485,000.00
for the benefit of TCO.

The New ARDH1 Operating Agreement shall become effective and be
deemed to amend and restate the ARDH1 Operating Agreement without
the need for any further notice or approvals. To the extent
necessary, the Reorganized OpCo Debtors Constituent Documents will
include, among other things, pursuant to section 1123(a)(6) of the
Bankruptcy Code, a provision prohibiting the issuance of non-voting
equity securities.

The Reorganized OpCo Debtors shall execute and deliver the New RBL
Credit Agreement and the other New RBL Loan Documents, and shall
execute, deliver, file, record and issue any other related notes,
guarantees, deeds of trust, security documents or instruments,
amendments to the foregoing, or agreements in connection therewith,
without further notice to or order of the Bankruptcy Court or
further act or action under applicable law, regulation, order or
rule or the vote, consent, authorization or approval of any Entity.


The form of the New RBL Credit Agreement, which shall be filed with
the Plan Supplement, shall be consistent with the RSA and the New
RBL Term Sheet, and shall be in form and substance reasonably
acceptable to the Debtors, the Required Consenting Term/Seller
Stakeholders and the New RBL Agent.

A black-lined copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/ucb9aa4 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtors are represented by:

         Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
         Michael H. Torkin, Esq.
         Kathrine A. McLendon, Esq.
         Nicholas E. Baker, Esq.
         425 Lexington Avenue
         New York, NY 10017
         Fax: (212) 455-2502
         E-mail: michael.torkin@stblaw.com
                 kmclendon@stblaw.com
                 nbaker@stblaw.com

                  - and -

         Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP
         Pauline K. Morgan, Esq.
         Kara Hammond Coyle, Esq.
         Ashley E. Jacobs, Esq.
         Rodney Square
         1000 North King Street
         Wilmington, DE 19801
         Fax: (302) 571-1253
         E-mail: pmorgan@ycst.com
                 kcoyle@ycst.com
                 ajacobs@ycst.com

                     About Arsenal Resources

Arsenal Resources -- http://www.arsenalresources.com/-- is an
independent exploration and production company headquartered in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that is engaged in the acquisition,
exploration, development and production of natural gas in the
Appalachian Basin.  

Arsenal Resources Development LLC and 16 affiliates sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12347) on Nov. 8,
2019, to implement terms of a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

Arsenal was estimated to have at least $500 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Company is represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP, as legal counsel, PJT Partners
LP, as investment banker and Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC,
as restructuring advisor.


ASHBY TOWNHOMES: Quilling Selander Approved as General Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ashby Townhomes, LLC, sought and obtained permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas to hire
Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C. as its general
counsel in this bankruptcy case.  

The Debtor needs Quilling Selander to:

(a)  Furnish legal advice to the Debtor with regard to its powers,
duties, and responsibilities as Debtor-in-possession and the
continued management of its affairs and assets under chapter 11;

(b)  Prepare, for and on behalf of the Debtor, all necessary
applications, motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal
papers;

(c)  Prepare a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization and
other services incident thereto;

(d)  Investigate and prosecute preference and fraudulent transfers
actions arising under the avoidance powers of the Bankruptcy Code;
and

(e)  Perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may be
necessary herein.

The normal hourly billing rates of Quilling Selander range from
$275.00 to $400.00 per hour for shareholders; and $175.00 to
$275.00 per hour for associates. The rates for paralegals range
from $50.00 to $115.00 per hour.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, the partners, counsel, and
associates of Quilling Selander do not have any connection with the
Debtor, its creditors, or any other party in interest, their
respective attorneys or accountants, the United States Trustee, or
any person employed in the office of the United States Trustee. The
Debtor believes that Quilling Selander represents no interest
adverse to either the Debtor or its estate in the matters to which
it will be engaged for the Debtor, as required by section 327 of
the Bankruptcy Code, and that the employment of Quilling Selander
would serve the best interests of the Debtor's estate.

The firm may be reached at:

     John Paul Stanford, Esq.
     QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT& MOSER, P.C.
     2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Tel: (214) 880-1805
     Fax: (214) 871-2111

                   About Ashby Townhomes

Ashby Townhomes LLC is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. section 101(51B)).

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Tex. Case No. 19-43267) on December 2, 2019.  The Hon. Brenda T.
Rhoades oversees the case.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Eric
Rioja, managing member.

The Debtor is represented by John Paul Stanford, Esq., at Quilling,
Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C.



BANTEK INC: Delays Form 10-K for Year Ended Sept. 30
----------------------------------------------------
Bantek, Inc. filed a Form 12b-25 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission notifying that it will be delayed in filing its Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Sept. 30, 2019.  The Company
was unable to compile the necessary financial information required
to prepare a complete filing.  Thus, the Company would be unable to
file the annual report in a timely manner without unreasonable
effort or expense.  The Company expects to file within the
extension period.

                          About Bantek

Bantek, Inc., f/k/a Drone USA, Inc., is an Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
("UAV") and related services and technology company that intends to
engage in the distribution, and integration of advanced low
altitude UAV systems, services and products.  The Company has
operations based in Pine Brook, New Jersey and Vancouver,
Washington.

Bantek reported a net loss of $5.77 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2018, following a net loss of $7.83 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $3.98
million in total assets, $15.59 million in total liabilities, and a
total stockholders' deficit of $11.61 million.

Salberg & Company, P.A., in Boca Raton, Florida, the Company's
auditor since 2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its
report dated Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has a net loss
and cash used in operations of $5,774,867 and $794,369,
respectively, for the year ended Sept. 30, 2018 and has a working
capital deficit, stockholders' deficit and accumulated deficit of
$12,170,117, $9,157,344 and $19,631,292 respectively, at Sept. 30,
2018.  The Company is also in default on certain promissory notes.
These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern.


BETTEROADS ASPHALT: Bankr. Court Denies Stay Motion Pending Appeal
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Puerto Rico denied the motion for stay pending appeal
filed by involuntary debtors Betteroads Asphalt, LLC and
Betterecycling Corporation.

The involuntary debtors have filed the motion for stay after
seeking to appeal the opinion and order of the Bankruptcy Court
entered on Oct. 11, 2019, that denied the alleged debtors' motion
to dismiss the involuntary petition filed by several petitioning
creditors, and concluding that the involuntary petition was not
filed in bad faith.

On June 9, 2017, an involuntary petition was filed against the
alleged debtors by:

     (1) lenders Firstbank Puerto Rico, Banco Santander de Puerto
Rico, the Economic Development Bank for Puerto Rico and Banco
Popular de Puerto Rico, as administrative agent,

     (2) Sargeant Marine, Inc. and Sargeant Trading LTD,

     (3) Facsimil Paper Connection, Inc.,

     (4) Champion Petroleum, Inc.,

     (5) Control Force, Corp., and

     (6) St. James Security, Inc.

The involuntary debtors request that the Chapter 11 proceedings be
stayed until the resolution of the pending appeals based on the
following arguments:

     (i) the notice of appeal deprives the bankruptcy court of
jurisdiction to entertain matters of a Chapter 11 case;

    (ii) in the alternative, there is a "substantial possibility"
of the involuntary debtors' success on the merits because, absent
said relief, irreparable harm will occur; and

   (iii) the involuntary debtors have proffered a reasonable bond
and sufficient for the requested relief in the event the Court
fails to dispense the involuntary debtors from such condition for
granting the stay remedy.

On November 11, 2019, the petitioning creditors filed a joint
opposition to the debtors' motion for stay pending appeal arguing,
among others, that (i) the involuntary debtors are not requesting
relief to preserve the issues on appeal but to suspend all of the
Chapter 11 proceedings and preclude the court from administering
these cases and parties from enforcing any rights available under
chapter 11; and that (ii) the divestiture doctrine applies to
prevent a trial court from amending and modifying the issues on
appeal while they are on appeal. It does not provide for a stay of
proceedings.

On November 15, 2019, the involuntary debtors filed their reply to
petitioning creditors' joint opposition to motion for stay pending
appeal.

          Series of Discovery Schedule Motions

The involuntary debtors and the lenders filed a joint motion on
discovery schedule on June 30, 2017, pursuant to which the parties
informed the court on the agreed discovery schedule relating to
contested matters regarding the involuntary petitions.

The Lenders sought to exclude broad and disproportionate discovery
on allegations of bad faith by the lenders and other petitioning
creditors who commenced the involuntary proceedings and on certain
counter claims filed against the Debtors in pending local court
litigation by filing a motion for protective order limiting scope
of discovery for the contested matters relating to the motion to
appoint a trustee and the involuntary petitions on August 3, 2017.

On August 30, 2017, the Lenders and the involuntary debtors filed
an amended joint motion on discovery schedule, and on November 7,
2017, the parties filed the second amended joint motion on
discovery schedule and request for status conference hearing.

Thereafter, the court in its opinion and order entered on November
30, 2018, held that:

    (i) the Petitioning Creditors have satisfied the three prong
requirement for filing an involuntary petition;

   (ii) bad faith is an independent cause for dismissal of an
involuntary petition under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 303(b); and

  (iii)  the alleged Debtors have failed to show that dismissal
pursuant to Sec. 305(a)(1) abstention is in the best interest of
both the creditors and the debtor.

The court also determined that an evidentiary hearing would be
scheduled to consider whether the involuntary petitions were filed
in bad faith, that is, for an improper purpose that constitutes an
abuse of the bankruptcy process.  Thereafter, the Court set an
evidentiary hearing for May 23, 2019 regarding the involuntary
debtors' motions to dismiss the involuntary petitions and the
oppositions thereto.

In the intervening period prior to the May 23, 2019 hearing, the
lenders and the alleged debtors filed a joint motion on discovery
schedule, and an amended joint motion on discovery schedule on
March 7, 2019 and March 26, 2019, respectively.

The Court rescheduled the evidentiary hearing set for May 23, 2019
to June 27, 2019 upon the joint request of the lenders and the
alleged debtors.  On April 9, 2019, the parties filed a joint
motion on second amended discovery schedule.  

On June 20, 2019, the petitioning creditors filed their joint
pretrial report in connection with the June 27, 2019 hearing, and
the day after, on June 21, 2019 the alleged Debtors filed their
preliminary pretrial report.

On June 26, 2019, the court entered an amended order in which it
addressed several of the motions regarding the discovery disputes
between Betteroads and Sargeant.  The Court concluded therein that
the improper purpose has not been clearly defined and as such is
unable to extend the scope of the alleged Debtor's discovery
requests to other affiliates and/or related entities.  The court
hereby grants Sargeant's omnibus reply to alleged debtor's motion
regarding discovery disputes requesting order to compel discovery
and examination and answer to comply with order opposing motion to
quash or otherwise plead and for extension of time.  However, the
court ruled to allow for one deposition to be taken from an officer
of Sargeant that is knowledgeable regarding the events leading to
the filing of the involuntary petition.

Thereafter, evidentiary hearings were held on June 27, 2019; July
15, 2019, July 17, 2019, and July 18, 2019.  After the involuntary
debtors presented their case in chief, the petitioning creditors
moved for the denial of the involuntary debtors' request to dismiss
the petition pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7052 because the
involuntary debtors failed to meet their burden of proving that the
involuntary petitions were filed in bad faith.

On October 11, 2019, the Court rendered its Opinion and Order:
   "[a]fter a careful review of the evidence presented by the
involuntary debtors, the court finds that the same does not
establish that the petitions were filed for an improper bankruptcy
purpose.  Seeking that other creditors join in filing an
involuntary petition in order to pursue debt collection in the
bankruptcy court is not an improper bankruptcy purpose.  In re
Basil Street Partners, 477 B.R. 853.  The evidence presented showed
that the involuntary debtors had defaulted on their loan payments
and, that the lenders had engaged in active collection actions. The
discussions by and between the lenders, including the syndicate
lenders, and the advice provided by their legal counsel show that
the decision to file the involuntary petitions was more in the
nature of a studied business decision than an action to harass or
merely seek an alternate collection forum".

Consequently, the court determined that the involuntary petitions
were not filed in bad faith and an order for relief under Chapter
11 was entered subsequently.

                  The Appeal and Onwards

On October 24, 2019, the alleged debtors filed their notice of
appeal and statement of election by which they appeal the opinion
and order entered on October 11, 2019, which denied the alleged
debtors' motion to dismiss, and concluded that the involuntary
petitions were not filed in bad faith.

The involuntary debtors also appeal several interlocutory orders
and rulings which have become final upon the entry of the Oct. 11,
2019 order, including, among others, an Opinion and Order of
November 30, 2018 in which the court determined that the
Petitioning Creditors satisfied the three-prong requirement for
filing an involuntary petition pursuant to Section 303(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

On November 8, 2019, the lenders filed their notice of cross-appeal
in which they seek revision of the legal determination made in the
November 30, 2018 opinion and order, that bad faith is an
independent cause of dismissal of an involuntary petition under
Section 303(b).

On November 4, 2019, the involuntary debtors filed a motion for
stay pending appeal.  The petitioning creditors filed their joint
opposition on November 11, 2019.  The alleged debtors filed their
reply to the petitioning creditors' joint opposition to the motion
for stay pending appeal on Nov. 15, 2019.

The involuntary debtors contend that the bankruptcy court does not
have jurisdiction to proceed with a Chapter 11 case when those
aspects of the case are deeply related to the appeal.  The
involuntary debtors raised the point, among others, that (i) ". . .
it is precisely whether the door to a Chapter 11 will be opened or
should remain closed what is explicitly at stake and under review
at the district court;" (ii) ". . . any execution and/or scheduling
of Chapter 11 tasks and reliefs grounded in an order for relief
issued as a result of an opinion and order, when both are under
review, will be intimately related to the matters specifically
defined in the appeal and will certainly interfere with and
effectively circumvent the alleged debtor's right to the appeal
process.  The alleged debtors contend that the Chapter 11
proceeding should be stayed as a matter of right while the pendency
of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, without the imposition of
any other requirement."

The petitioning creditors contend that the involuntary debtors'
jurisdictional argument is unfounded.  The petitioning creditors
alleged that the involuntary debtors are not requesting relief to
preserve the issues on appeal, but that they are requesting that
the court suspend all proceedings that may arise in these chapter
11 cases and preclude the court from administering the same and the
parties from enjoining any rights available under chapter 11.  The
petitioning creditors also argued that the divestiture doctrine
prevents a trial court from amending or modifying the issues on
appeal while they are on appeal.  It does not provide for a stay of
proceedings as requested by the involuntary debtors.

According to the petitioning creditors, proceeding with the
administration and continuation of the Chapter 11 proceedings is,
at most, an 'enforcement' or 'implementation' of the entry of the
order for relief that would not implicate the divestiture doctrine,
as the Court would be doing nothing to modify the Discovery Orders,
the 2018 Opinion and Order, or the 2019 Opinion and Order."

In re Sabine, 548 B.R. at 680, the Court held that the divestiture
doctrine is not intended to 'cede control' of the conduct of a
Chapter 11 case to disappointed litigants.  Such a decision would
be contrary to Fifth Circuit precedent indicating that a narrow
interpretation [of divestiture doctrine] is normally appropriate In
re Weingarten, 661 F. 3d at 908.'" Neutra, Ltd. v. Terry (In re
Acis Capital Mgmt., L.P., 604 B.R. 484, 524 (Northern District of
Texas, 2019).  The court concludes that the Opinions and Orders and
legal issues therein do not divest this court of jurisdiction from
carrying forward with the administering of the involuntary cases.

The court, in its November 30, 2018 Opinion and Order, after
thoroughly analyzing the parties' position, aligned itself with the
holding of In re Forever Green Athletic Fields, Inc. 804 F.3d 328
(3rd Cir. 2015), in which the Third Circuit held that bad faith
serves as a basis for both dismissal and damages and supported its
position on the good faith filing requirements.  In In re Forever
Green Athletic Fields, Inc., the Third Circuit employed a "totality
of circumstances" standard for determining bad faith pursuant to
Section 303.

The Third Circuit in In re Forever Green Athletic Fields, Inc.,
explained the reasoning for employing the totality of the
circumstances test as follows:  "[w]e adopt the totality of
circumstances test standard for determining bad faith under Section
303.  This standard is most suitable for evaluating the myriad ways
in which creditors filing an involuntary petition could act in bad
faith.  It also is the same standard we apply when reviewing
allegations that a debtor filed a voluntary petition in bad faith.
. . . In conducting this fact-intensive review, courts may consider
a number of factors, including, but not limited to, whether: the
creditors satisfied the statutory criteria for filing the petition;
the involuntary petition was meritorious; the creditors made a
reasonable inquiry into the relevant facts and pertinent law before
filing; there was evidence of preferential payments to certain
creditors or of dissipation of the debtor's assets; the filing was
motivated by ill will or a desire to harass; the petitioning
creditors used the filing to obtain a disproportionate advantage
for themselves rather than to protect against other creditors doing
the same; the filing was used as a tactical advantage in pending
actions; the filing was used as a substitute for customary
debt-collection procedures; and the filing had suspicious timing In
re Forever Green Fields, Inc., 804 F. 3d at 336."

The involuntary debtors alleged that the involuntary petitions were
filed in fact seeking an equitable relief or a monetary and
litigation strategy, even in detriment of other potential
creditors, which is more evident upon their adherence and posture
of keeping these agreements confidential.

The court, however, did not find any improper purpose or bad faith
in the filing of the involuntary petitions.  As to the carveout
agreements regarding this particular purpose in an involuntary
petition, the court concluded that, "[s]eeking that other creditors
join in filing an involuntary petition in order to pursue debt
collection in the bankruptcy court is not an improper bankruptcy
purpose. In re Basil Street Partners, LLC, 477 B.R. 853." (Case
17-04156, Docket No. 520, pg. 9-10; case 17-04157, Docket No. 362,
pg. 9-10). The court's reasoning in In re Basil Street Partners,
LLC, for concluding that requesting other creditors to join the
involuntary petition does not constitute bad faith is based upon
the following, "[w]ith respect to Basil Street's charge that APL
orchestrated this case, the court notes that merely seeking out
other creditors to join in the petition does not give rise to a
finding of bad faith, unless such solicitation involved the use of
fraudulent statements, harassive conduct, or the exertion of undue
pressure. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. DJF Realty & Suppliers,
Inc., 58 B.R. 1008, 1012 (N.D.N.Y. 1986)" Id. at 853.

The court finds that the involuntary debtors have failed to satisfy
the first prong of the stay pending appeal requirements which is
likelihood to succeed on the merits.

In view of the foregoing, the court holds that the divestiture
doctrine does not apply to the involuntary bankruptcy proceedings.


The court declines to address the issue of whether the involuntary
debtors should be required to post a bond at this stage in the
proceedings.

The opinion and order dated Dec. 6, 2019 is available at
https://www.leagle.com/decision/inbco20191209581 from Leagle.com.

Alexis A. Betancourt Vincenty, Lugo Mender Group LLC, 100 PR-165
Ste 501, Toa Alta, 00968, Puerto Rico, Wigberto Lugo Mender, Lugo
Mender & Co., 100 Carr. 165 Suite 501, Guaynabo, PR 00968-8052,
counsel for Betteroads Asphalt LLC, Alleged Debtor.

Alexis A. Betancourt Vincenty, Lugo Mender Group LLC, 100 Carr. 165
Suite 501, Guaynabo, PR 00968-8052, Wigberto Lugo Mender, Lugo
Mender & Co., 100 Carr. 165 Suite 501, Guaynabo, PR 00968-8052,
counsel for Betteroads Alphalt LLC, Debtor.

Gustavo A. Chico Barris, Ferraiuoli LLC, 221 Ponce de León Avenue,
5th Floor, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00917, Sonia Colon Colon,
Ferraiuoli, LLC, 221 Ponce de León Avenue, 5th Floor, San Juan,
Puerto Rico 00917, Jordi Guso , Berger Singerman LLP, 350 East Las
Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, Camille N.
Somoza, Ferraiuoli LLC, 221 Ponce de León Avenue, 5th Floor, San
Juan, Puerto Rico 00917, counsel for Sargeant Trading Limited &
Sargeant Marine Inc., Petitioning Creditors.

Valerie M. Blay Soler, Marini Pietrantoni Muniz, LLC., Suite 900
250 Ave., Ponce de Leon, San Juan, PR 00918, Jonathan Camacho
Villamil, Marini Pietrantoni Muiz LLC, Suite 900, 250 Ave. Ponce de
Leon, San Juan, PR 00918, Ignacio Labarca Morales, Marini
Pietrantoni Muniz LLC, Suite 900, 250 Ave. Ponce de Leon, San Juan,
PR 00918, Luis C. Marini Biaggi, Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC,
Suite 900, 250 Ave. Ponce de Leon, San Juan, PR 00918, Mauricio O.
Muniz,  Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC, Suite 900, 250 Ave. Ponce de
Leon, San Juan, PR 00918, Carolina Velaz Rivero,  Marini
Pietrantoni Muniz LLC, Suite 900, 250 Ave. Ponce de Leon, San Juan,
PR 00918, counsel for Banco Popular De Puerto Rico, Economic
Development Bank For Puerto Rico & Banco Santander De Puerto Rico,
Petitioning Creditors.

Valerie M. Blay Soler, Marini Pietrantoni Muniz, LLC., Jonathan
Camacho Villamil, Marini Pietrantoni Muiz LLC, Fausto David Godreau
Zayas, Godreau & Gonzalez Law, Rafael A. Gonzalez Valiente, Godreau
& Gonzalez Law, Ignacio Labarca Morales, Marini Pietrantoni Muniz
LLC, Luis C. Marini Biaggi, Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC, Mauricio
O. Muniz Luciano, Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC & Carolina Velaz
Rivero, Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC, counsel for Firstbank Puerto
Rico, Petitioning Creditor.

Israel O. Alicea Luciano, Capital Center Building, Torre Sur, No.3
Arterial De Hostos Suite 702, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico, PR 00918,
Alexis Fuentes Hernandez , Fuentes Law Offices, LLC, counsel for
St. James Security Inc., Petitioning Creditor.

Alexis Fuentes Hernandez, Fuentes Law Offices, LLC, Cond. Pisos de
Don Juan, 405 San Francisco St., Suite 4-A, San Juan, PR 00901,
counsel for Facsimil Paper Connection, Inc., Petitioning Creditor.

Juan P. Rivera Roman, Juan P Rivera Roman Law Firm, PO Box 7498,
Ponce, PR 00732, counsel for Municipality of Guayanilla, 3rd Party
Plaintiff.

Manuel Fernandez Bared, Toro Colon Mullet Rivera & Sifre, 416 Ponce
de León Avenue, Union Plaza, Suite 311, San Juan, PR 00918-3430,
Linette Figueroa Torres , Toro Colon Mullet P.S.C., 416 Ponce de
León Avenue, Union Plaza, Suite 311, San Juan, PR 00918-3430&
Nayda Ivette Perez-Roman, Toro, Colon, Mullet, Rivera & Sifre,
P.S.C., 416 Ponce de León Avenue, Union Plaza, Suite 311, San
Juan, PR 00918-3430, counsel for Bituven Puerto Rico, LLC, 3rd
Party Plaintiff.

                   About BetterRoads Asphalt
                and Betterecycling Corporation

BetterRoads Asphalt LLC produces warm mix asphalt. Its products are
used in airports, highways, neighborhoods, and environment
projects. Betterecycling Corporation produces gasoline, kerosene,
distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, and lubricants.  Both
companies are based in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

On June 9, 2017, alleged creditors commenced involuntary bankruptcy
petitions, under chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 17-04156), against Betteroads  Asphalt LLC,
under Case No. 17-04156-ESL and Betterecycling Corporation (Case
No. 17-04157-ESL).

On Nov. 30, 2018, the Court entered an "opinion and order"
including findings and concluding that, among other things, the
Petitioning Creditors have satisfied the three-prong requirement
for filing an involuntary petition.

On Oct. 10, 2019, after a five-day evidentiary hearing, the Court
entered an "opinion and Order" finding, among other things, that
the involuntary petitions were not filed for an improper bankruptcy
purpose or with bad faith.

On October 11, 2019, the Court entered the "order for relief".


BODY BY PASTRAMI: Has Until May 4, 2020 to File Plan & Disclosures
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Trish M. Brown of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Oregon ordered that the deadline for debtor Body by Pastrami,
LLC to file a Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization is
May 4, 2020.

                      About Body By Pastrami

Body By Pastrami, LLC, is an Oregon limited liability company
managed by its member, Ken Gordan. The company owns and operates a
delicatessen in the Portland metropolitan area, Kenny & Zuke's
Delicatessen.

Body By Pastrami sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ore. Case No. 19-34107) on Nov. 6, 2019,
disclosing assets of less than $500,000 and debt of less than $1
million.  The Debtor is represented by Nicholas J. Henderson, Esq.,
at Motschenbacher & Blattner, LLP.


BORDEN DAIRY: Case Summary & 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: Borden Dairy Company
             8750 North Central Expressway, Suite 400
             Dallas, TX 75231

Business Description: Borden Dairy Company -- www.bordendairy.com
                      -- is a processor and direct-to-store
                      distributor of fresh fluid milk, dairy case
                      products, and other beverages.  The Debtors
                      produce and distribute a wide variety of
                      branded and private label traditional,
                      flavored and specialty milk, buttermilk,
                      dips and sour cream, juices, tea, and
                      flavored drinks to mass merchandisers,
                      educational institutions, food service
                      retailers, grocery stores, drug stores,
                      convenience stores, food and beverage
                      wholesale distributors, and retail warehouse

                      club stores across the United States.
                      Borden is headquartered in Dallas and
                      operates 12 milk processing plants and
                      nearly 100 branches across the U.S.
                      The Company was founded in 1857 by Gail
                      Borden, Jr.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 5, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware

Eighteen affiliates that simultaneously filed voluntary petitions
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                         Case No.
    ------                                         --------
    Borden Dairy Company (Lead Case)               20-10010
    Borden Dairy Holdings, LLC                     20-10011
    National Dairy, LLC                            20-10012
    Borden Dairy Company of Alabama, LLC           20-10013
    Borden Dairy Company of Cincinnati, LLC        20-10014
    Borden Transport Company of Cincinnati, LLC    20-10015
    Borden Dairy Company of Florida, LLC           20-10016
    Borden Dairy Company of Kentucky, LLC          20-10017
    Borden Dairy Company of Louisiana, LLC         20-10018
    Borden Dairy Company of Madisonville, LLC      20-10019
    Borden Dairy Company of Ohio, LLC              20-10020
    Borden Transport Company of Ohio, LLC          20-10021
    Borden Dairy Company of South Carolina, LLC    20-10022
    Borden Dairy Company of Texas, LLC             20-10023
    Claims Adjusting Services, LLC                 20-10024
    Georgia Soft Serve Delights, LLC               20-10025
    NDH Transport, LLC                             20-10026
    RGC, LLC                                       20-10027

Judge: Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi

Debtors'
General
Bankruptcy
Counsel:             D. Tyler Nurnberg, Esq.
                     Seth J. Kleinman, Esq.
                     Sarah Gryll, Esq.
                     ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
                     70 West Madison Street, Suite 4200
                     Chicago, Illinois 60602-4231
                     Tel: (312) 583-2300
                     Fax: (312) 583-2360
                     Email: tyler.nurnberg@arnoldporter.com
                            seth.kleinman@arnoldporter.com
                            sarah.gryll@arnoldporter.com

Debtors'
Delaware &
Conflicts            M. Blake Cleary, Esq.
                     Kenneth J. Enos, Esq.
                     Elizabeth S. Justison, Esq.
                     Betsy L. Feldman, Esq.
                     YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
                     Rodney Square
                     1000 North King Street
                     Wilmington, Delaware 19801
                     Tel: (302) 571-6600
                     Fax: (302) 571-1253
                     Email: mbcleary@ycst.com
                            kenos@ycst.com
                            ejustison@ycst.com
                            bfeldman@ycst.com

Debtors'
Noticing,
Claims &
Balloting
Agent:               DONLIN RECANO
                    https://www.donlinrecano.com/Clients/bdc/Index

Estimated Assets
(on a consolidated basis): $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Liabilities
(on a consolidated basis): $100 million to $500 million

The petitions were signed by Jason Monaco, chief financial
officer.

A copy of Borden Dairy Company's petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                       https://is.gd/dppkkp

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Central States Health & Welfare    Unfunded         $33,163,725
Central States Southeast             Withdrawal
and Southwest Areas                   Liability
Health and Welfare and
Pension Funds
P.O. Box 5123
Law Department
Des Plaines IL 60017-5123
Charles H. Lee
Tel: 847-939-2481
Fax: 847-518-9797

2. Lone Star Milk                  Trade Payable        $6,148,092
Producers Inc.
217 Baird Ln
Windhorst TX 76389-6023
Sonya Fabien
Tel: 940-378-2311
Email: sonyafabien@lonestarmilk.com

3. CKS Packaging                   Trade Payable        $4,530,497
350 Great Southwest Pkwy SW
Atlanta, GA 30336
Dave Crompton
Tel: 404-699-9431
Email: laura@ckspackaging.com

4. Dairy Farmers of America        Trade Payable        $2,706,565
10220 N Ambassador Dr, Ste 1000
Kansas City MO 64153
Dean Van Tuinen
Tel: 816-801-6652
Email: egunsolus@dfamilk.com

5. Maryland & Virginia of Laurel   Trade Payable        $2,335,756
PO Box 602295
Charlotte NC 28260-2295
Email: dlipscomb@mdvamilk.com

6. Tetra Pak Inc.                  Trade Payable        $2,178,288
3300 Airport Rd
Denton, TX 76207
Johan Gudmundsson
Tel: 940-565-8800
Email: payment.remittance@tetrapak.com

7. Packaging Corporation           Trade Payable          $938,536
of America
1955 West Field Court
Lake Forest IL 60045
Bill Harding
Tel: 972-516-4515
Email: bmularkey@packagingcorp.com

8. Douglas Machine Inc.            Trade Payable          $922,730
3404 Iowa St.
Alexandria MN 56308-3345
Andrew Messerich
Tel: 320-762-6230

9. Southeast Milk Inc.             Trade Payable          $780,050
PO Box 3790
Belleview FL 34421-3790
Karen Womack
Tel: 352-347-3790
Email: dmartin@southeastmilk.org

10. Myrtle Consulting Group LLC    Trade Payable          $694,454
16225 ParkTen Pl, Ste 620
Houston, TX 77084-5155
Tel: 281-600-7275

11. Orbis Corporation              Trade Payable          $641,700
1055 Corporate Center Dr
Oconomowoc WI 53066
Tom Atkins
Tel: 920-751-1986
Email: danielle.heraly@menasha.com

12. Petroleum Traders Corporation  Trade Payable          $598,300
7120 Pointe Inverness Way
Fort Wayne IN 46804
Scott Wake
Tel: 260-469-5837
Email: hstevenson@petroleumtraders.com

13. Silgan IPEC                    Trade Payable          $593,039
185 Northgate Cir
New Castle PA 16105
Todd Price
Tel: 800-3774732
Email: patricia.cluchey@silganclosures.com

14. Red Diamond Inc.               Trade Payable          $558,200
400 Park Ave
Moody AL 35004
Steve Lowry
Email: michaeljordan@reddiamond.com

15. Saputo Dairy Foods USA LLC     Trade Payable          $545,748
1401 Elm St
Dallas, TX 75284-0151
Tom Fenton
Tel: 214-863-2300
Email: tcarvelli@southeastmilk.org

16. Good Humor Breyers             Trade Payable          $529,593
909 Packerland Drive
Green Bay WI 54307
Tel: 203-381-3654
Fax: 920-497-6523
Email: ebusiness.support@unilever.com

17. Alex C Fergusson LLC           Trade Payable          $497,293
5121 Coffey Ave Ste D
Chambersburg PA 17201
Mike Hinkle
Tel: 717-264 9147
Email: mpowell@afco.net

18. KDV Label Co Inc.              Trade Payable          $410,959
431 W Newhall Ave
Waukensha WI 53186
Darrell O'Brien
Tel: 262-548-6945
Email: accounting@kdvlabel.com

19. Retail, Wholesale, and           Unfunded             $391,040
Department Store Union,             Withdrawal
Local 323                            Liability
Retail, Wholesale and
Department Store Union,
AFL-CIO
370 7th Ave, Ste 501
New York, NY 10001
Tel: 212-684-5300

20. Mansfield Oil Co of            Trade Payable          $363,998
Gainesville
1025 Airport Pkwy
Gainesville, GA 30501
Tara Hernandez
Tel: 678-207-4768
Email: thernandez@mansfieldoil.com

21. Sensient Flavors Inc.          Trade Payable          $358,842
5700 W Raymond St.
Indianapolis IN 46241
Dennis Ball
Tel: 317-243-3521
Email: carissa.dahik@sensient.com

22. Gandy's Dairies Inc.           Trade Payable          $298,952
2515 McKinney Ave
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel: 800-334-3865

23. Pullman Sugar LLC              Trade Payable          $272,473
700 E 10th St.
Chicago, IL 60628-3806
Brandon Boomsma
Trade Payable
Tel: 773-260-9165
accounting@pullmansugar.com

24. Citrofrut USA, LLC             Trade Payable          $266,380
4200 W Ursula Ave
Mcallen TX 78503
Ricardo Martinez Zambrano
Tel: 877-248-7648
Email: sonia.rivas@citrofrut.com

25. Plastics Inc.                  Trade Payable          $245,405
PO Box 159
Greensboro AL 36744
Mary Blankenship
Tel: 334-624-8801
Email: mblankenship51@bellsouth.net

26. Lisma Logistics Inc.           Trade Payable          $234,691
790 Thorpe Rd
Orlando FL 32824-8013
Victor Rodriguez
Tel: 954-665-6655

27. ACE American Insurance Co.     Trade Payable          $229,475
Dept. Ch 10123
Palantine IL 60055-0123
Tel: 800-323-4105
Email: shashank.khandelwal@chubb.com

28. W W Grainger Inc.              Trade Payable          $223,385
100 Grainger Parkway
Lake Forest IL 60045
Cody Bryan
Tel: 800-472-4643
Email: financialservices@grainger.com

29. Applied Industrial             Trade Payable          $219,551
Technologies
1 Applied Plz
Cleveland, OH 44115
Tom Granata
Tel: 972-506-0612
Email: RVera@Applied.com

30. Tropic Oil Company             Trade Payable          $210,910
PO Box 1668
Houston TX 77251-1668
Tel: 863-676-3910


CAMBER ENERGY: Closes Preferred Stock Redemption Agreement
----------------------------------------------------------
Camber Energy, Inc. has entered into and closed the transactions
contemplated by a Preferred Stock Redemption Agreement.

The redemption agreement, entered into with Lineal Star Holdings,
LLC, Lineal Star's wholly-owned subsidiaries and the holders of the
Company's Series E and F Preferred Stock, resulted in the
redemption and cancellation of all of the Company's outstanding
Series E and F Preferred Stock in consideration for the return to
the Series E and F Preferred Stock holders (i.e., the holders of
the outstanding interests of Lineal Star prior to the Company's
acquisition via merger of Lineal Star in July 2019), of 100% of the
outstanding interests of Lineal Star.

The mutual determination to move forward with such redemption
transaction was due partially to the fact that the parties have,
since the date of the July 2019 merger, been, for various reasons,
unable to complete a further acquisition or combination which would
allow the post-merger combined company to meet the initial listing
standards of the NYSE American.  This was a requirement to the
Company having to seek shareholder approval for the terms of the
Series E Preferred Stock (including the voting rights (i.e., the
right, together with the Series F Preferred Stock, to vote 80% of
the Company's voting shares) and conversion rights (i.e., the right
to convert into between 67-70% of the Company's post-shareholder
approval capitalization) associated therewith).  Consequently, and
because no definitive timeline was able to be established for when
the Company believed it would meet the NYSE American initial
listing standards and consequently, when shareholder approval would
be sought or received for the terms of the Series E Preferred Stock
and Series F Preferred Stock, the parties determined it was in
their mutual best interests to unwind the merger by way of the
redemption.

The redemption agreement also provides for (i) mutual general
releases by (a) Lineal, its subsidiaries, and each preferred
holder, subject to certain limited exceptions in the event of a
third-party claim and (b) the Company; (ii) non-disparagement and
confidentiality obligations of the parties and (iii)
indemnification obligations, each as described in greater detail in
the redemption agreement.

As part of the redemption transaction, the Company loaned $800,000
to Lineal and Lineal and the Company increased the amount of the
prior $1,050,000 promissory note evidencing amounts loaned by the
Company to Lineal at the closing of the merger, to approximately
$1.5 million, to evidence additional amounts loaned by the Company
to Lineal from July to December 2019.

The result of the redemption was to effectively unwind the July
2019 merger (and related transactions), effective as of Dec. 31,
2019.  As a result of the redemption, the agreements entered into
with the holders of the Company's Series C Preferred Stock in July
2019, relating to planned exchange of Series C Preferred Stock for
shares of Series D Preferred Stock and termination of certain other
obligations of the Company, were automatically terminated pursuant
to their terms.

                     About Camber Energy

Based in San Antonio, Texas, Camber Energy, Inc. (NYSE American:
CEI) -- http://www.camber.energy-- is an independent oil and gas
company engaged in the development of crude oil, natural gas and
natural gas liquids in the Hunton formation in Central Oklahoma in
addition to anticipated project development in the Texas Panhandle.
The Company also provides midstream and downstream pipeline
specialty construction, maintenance and field services via its
recently announced acquisition agreement with Lineal Star Holdings
LLC.

Camber Energy reported net income of $16.64 million for the year
ended March 31, 2019, following a net loss of $24.77 million for
the year ended March 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company
had $31.19 million in total assets, $6.15 million in total
liabilities, $20.12 million in total temporary equity, and $4.92
million in total stockholders' equity.

Camber Energy received on July 2, 2019, a deficiency letter from
NYSE American LLC stating that the Company is not in compliance
with the continued listing standards as set forth in Section
103(f)(v) of the NYSE American Company Guide.  The Deficiency
Letter indicated that the Company's securities have been selling
for a low price per share for a substantial period of time.


CARET CORPORATION: Hires Capital Recovery as Auctioneer
-------------------------------------------------------
Caret Corporation, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to employ
Capital Recovery Group, LLC, as auctioneer to the Debtors.

Caret Corporation requires Capital Recovery to sell, market and
auction all of the Debtors' machinery, equipments, inventory and
the trademarks and other intellectual property associated with the
brands "Prestige" and "Total Intensity", located at 180 Passaic
Avenue, Building B, Fairfield, New Jersey.

Capital Recovery will be paid a commission of 10% of the sales
price, and buyer's premium of 18%.

Capital Recovery will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Gary Katz, vice president of Capital Recovery Group, LLC, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Capital Recovery can be reached at:

     Gary Katz
     CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUP, LLC
     1654 King Street
     Enfield, CT 06082
     Tel: (860) 623-9060

                   About Caret Corporation

Caret Corporation, based in Fairfield, NJ, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-31194) on Nov. 8, 2019.  In the
petition signed by Ivonne Ruggles, president, the Debtor was
estimated to have $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Stacey L. Meisel oversees the
case.  Morris S. Bauer, Esq., at Norris Mclaughlin, P.A., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.




CAREVIEW COMMUNICATIONS: HealthCor et al. Own 29.2% as of Dec. 31
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, these entities and individuals reported beneficial
ownership of shares of common stock of CareView Communications,
Inc. as of Dec. 31, 2019:

                                             Shares      Percent
                                           Beneficially     of
   Reporting Person                           Owned       Class
   ----------------                        ------------   -------
HealthCor Management, L.P.                  16,252,930     10.4%
HealthCor Associates, LLC                   16,252,930     10.4%
HealthCor Hybrid Offshore Master Fund, L.P. 16,252,930     10.4%
HealthCor Hybrid Offshore GP, LLC           16,252,930     10.4%
HealthCor Group, LLC                        16,252,930     10.4%
HealthCor Partners Management, L.P.         18,288,354     11.6%
HealthCor Partners Management GP, LLC       18,288,354     11.6%
HealthCor Partners Fund, L.P.               18,288,354     11.6%
HealthCor Partners L.P.                     18,288,354     11.6%
HealthCor Partners GP, LLC                  18,288,354     11.6%
Jeffrey C. Lightcap                         35,300,317     20.2%
Arthur Cohen                                37,892,783     21.4%
Joseph Healey                               37,011,173     21.0%

Collectively, the Reporting Persons beneficially own an aggregate
of 57,374,635 shares of Common Stock, representing (i) 1,800,433
shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon conversion of the
Twelfth Amendment Notes (including interest paid in kind through
Dec. 31, 2019), (ii) 5,988,171 shares of Common Stock that may be
acquired upon conversion of the Tenth Amendment Notes (including
interest paid in kind through Dec. 31, 2019), (iii) 6,279,322
shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon conversion of the
2018 Notes (including interest paid in kind through Dec. 31, 2019),
(iv) 10,902,997 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon
conversion of the 2015 Notes (including interest paid in kind
through Dec. 31, 2019), (v) 25,424,803 shares of Common Stock that
may be acquired upon conversion of the 2014 Notes (including
interest paid in kind through Dec. 31, 2019), (vi) 4,000,000 shares
of Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of the 2014
Warrants, (vii) 1,916,409 shares of Common Stock that may be
acquired upon exercise of the 2015 Warrants, (viii) 1,000,000
shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of the
Sixth Amendment Warrants and (ix) 62,500 shares of Common Stock
that may be acquired upon exercise of the 2018 Warrants.  This
aggregate amount represents approximately 29.2% of the Issuer's
outstanding common stock, based upon 139,380,748 shares outstanding
as of Nov. 14, 2019, as reported in the Issuer's most recent
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and gives effect to the conversion
of all 2014 Notes, 2015 Notes, 2018 Notes, Tenth Amendment Notes
and Twelfth Amendment Notes held by the Reporting Persons into
Common Stock and the exercise of all Warrants held by the Reporting
Persons.

On Dec. 31, 2019, the Issuer paid in-kind interest on the 2014
Notes in the principal amounts of $115,540 and $132,507 to the HCP
Fund and Hybrid Fund, respectively.  On the same date, the Issuer
paid in-kind interest on the 2015 Notes in the principal amounts of
$55,169, $38,618, $44,917 and $33,101 to HCP Fund, Mr. Lightcap,
Mr. Cohen and Mr. Healey, respectively, and paid in-kind interest
on the 2018 Notes, the Tenth Amendment Notes and the Twelfth
Amendment Notes in the principal amounts of $9,514, $9,073 and
$1,637, respectively, to Mr. Lightcap.

The Amendment was filed for the purpose of reflecting the payment
of interest in kind with respect to the 2014 Notes, the 2015 Notes,
the 2018 Notes, the Tenth Amendment Notes and the Twelfth Amendment
Notes on Sept. 30, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2019.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at
the SEC's website at:

                       https://is.gd/Ak0sBZ

                  About CareView Communications

CareView Communications, Inc. -- http://www.care-view.com/-- is a
provider of products and on-demand application services for the
healthcare industry, specializing in bedside video monitoring,
software tools to improve hospital communications and operations,
and patient education and entertainment packages.  Its proprietary,
high-speed data network system is the next generation of patient
care monitoring that allows real-time bedside and point-of-care
video monitoring designed to improve patient safety and overall
hospital costs.  The entertainment packages and patient education
enhance the patient's quality of  stay.  CareView is dedicated to
working with all types of hospitals, nursing homes, adult living
centers and selected outpatient care facilities domestically and
internationally.  The Company's corporate offices are located at
405 State Highway 121 Bypass, Suite B-240, Lewisville, TX 75067.

Careview Communications reported a net loss of $16.07 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $20.07
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019,
the Company had $6.93 million in total assets, $94.22 million in
total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $87.29
million in total stockholders' deficit.

BDO USA, LLP, in Dallas, Texas, the Company's auditor since 2010,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
29, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has accumulated losses since
inception that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


CBAK ENERGY: Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Bid Price Requirement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. received notification from staff of
the NASDAQ Listing Qualifications on Jan. 2, 2020, that the Company
has regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement for
continued listing set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rules 5550(a)(2).  As
a result, the matter of the Company's noncompliance with the
minimum bid price requirement under NASDAQ Listing Rules, as
announced in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated Sept.
26, 2019, had been closed.

                        About CBAK Energy

Dalian, China-based CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., formerly China
BAK Battery, Inc. -- http://www.cbak.com.cn/-- is engaged in the
business of developing, manufacturing and selling new energy high
power lithium batteries, which are mainly used in the following
applications: electric vehicles; light electric vehicles; and
electric tools, energy storage, uninterruptible power supply, and
other high power applications.

CBAK Energy reported a net loss of $1.95 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared with a net loss of $21.46 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had
$110.40 million in total assets, $98.90 million in total
liabilities, and $11.50 million in total equity.

Centurion ZD CPA & Co., in Hong Kong, China, the Company's auditor
since 2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the
Company has a working capital deficiency, accumulated deficit from
recurring net losses and significant short-term debt obligations
maturing in less than one year as of Dec. 31, 2018. All these
factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


CENTRAL PROCESSING: Court Slashes Professional Fees
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Phillip J. Shefferly of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Michigan approved in part and denied in part
the fee applications of Schafer and Weiner, P.L.L.C., and Harmon
Partners, LLC in the Chapter 11 case of Central Processing
Services, LLC.  Schafer and Weiner is counsel to the Debtor and
Harmon serves as the Debtor's financial advisor.

Following dismissal of the case, Schafer and Weiner filed on
October 2, 2019, a first and final fee application for $132,651.50,
plus reimbursement of costs for $3,805.49.  On the same day, Harmon
filed a first and final fee application for $36,645.  The United
States Trustee objected to the Schafer and Weiner Application, but
not the Harmon Application.

On October 22, 2019, the IRS filed a consolidated objection to both
fee applications to which Schafer and Weiner and Harmon filed a
reply on October 25, 2019.

The IRS Objection does not argue that all fees sought by Schafer
and Weiner and Harmon should be disallowed, only that all fees
incurred by Schafer and Weiner and Harmon after June 30, 2019
should be disallowed because, by that time, Schafer and Weiner and
Harmon knew or should have known that this case could not be
salvaged and the Debtor could not reorganize.  The IRS asked the
Court to approve no more than $77,473.50 in professional fees to
Schafer and Weiner; and approve no more than $21,770 in
professional fees to Harmon.

At the Nov. 22, 2019 hearing, Schafer and Weiner and the US Trustee
advised the Court that they are willing to settle the U.S.
Trustee's objection to the Schafer and Weiner application by the
firm agreeing to a $20,000 reduction in its fees.  After hearing
arguments by the IRS and by Schafer and Weiner, both for itself and
for Harmon, the Court took the fee applications under advisement.

Bankruptcy Code Section 330(a)(1)(A) provides that the Court may
award "reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services
rendered by . . . [a] professional person, or attorney and by any
paraprofessional person employed by any such person. . . ."  In
determining reasonable compensation, Section 330(a)(3) lists
nonexclusive factors for the Court to consider in determining
reasonable compensation, including whether the services were
necessary to the administration of, or beneficial at the time at
which the service was rendered toward the completion of, a case
under this title.  In addition, Section 330(a)(4)(A)(ii) provides
that the Court will not allow compensation for services that were
not reasonably likely to benefit the estate or necessary to the
administration of the case.

The IRS complained that some of the services performed by Schafer
and Weiner, and Harmon were not necessary to the administration of,
nor beneficial to, the Debtor's case at the time the services were
performed, nor were they reasonably likely to benefit the Debtor's
estate, as required by Section 330(a)(4)(A)(ii)(I) of the
Bankruptcy Code.  The IRS said the Debtor had not been profitable
for over 2-1/2 years.  The Debtor has been, and continues to be,
under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission, and the Debtor
"never intended to comply with their obligation to pay
post-petition taxes."  

These facts, according to the IRS, combine to demonstrate that the
Debtor had no hope for Chapter 11 success, "reorganization was
implausible," and Schafer and Weiner, and Harmon should have
consented to a voluntary dismissal of the case when requested to do
so by the IRS.  

The IRS also argued that no fees should be allowed for any time
after June 30, 2019, whereas Schafer and Weiner, and Harmon argue
that their fees should be awarded even after that date, subject to
Schafer and Weiner's agreement to resolve the U.S. Trustee's
objection by reducing its fees by $20,000.

Schafer and Weiner, and Harmon conceded that the Debtor failed to
pay its post-petition taxes, but argued that they are not
guarantors of the Debtor's responsibilities, asserting that they
should be compensated for all their services because those services
were necessary to the administration of the case.  Moreover,
Schafer and Weiner, and Harmon had at all relevant times a
reasonable belief that the Debtor could reorganize based on a
proposed change to its business model and based on the Debtor's
efforts to obtain post-petition financing.

To help the Debtor achieve a successful reorganization, Schafer and
Weiner, and Harmon worked hard to try to obtain a post-petition
loan to enable the Debtor to repay its delinquent post-petition
taxes.  The firms said the IRS was well aware of their efforts to
obtain a post-petition loan, and that the IRS was "supportive of
those efforts" up until July 30, 2019, at which time the IRS
definitively informed Schafer and Weiner and Harmon that it
withdrew its support.  According to the firms, it was only then
that "the Professionals knew that the Debtor could not reorganize."


The Court opined that implicit in Schafer and Weiner's agreement
with the US Trustee is a recognition that at some point Schafer and
Weiner had to know that the Debtor's case was going to fail and the
Debtor was not going to reorganize.  The primary difference between
the IRS on the one hand, and Schafer and Weiner and Harmon on the
other hand, has to do with the point in time that the professionals
should have recognized this, the Court said.  While the IRS argues
in a conclusory way that the case was doomed from the start, its
Objection focuses on June 30, 2019 because, by that date, the
Debtor was indebted to the IRS for more than $166,000 in
post-petition trust fund taxes. Moreover, the Debtor had suffered a
net loss of over $648,000 from March 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019.

Further to the consideration for allowing (or disallowing)
professional fees, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, In Boddy v.
United States Bankruptcy Court (In re Boddy), 950 F.2d 334, 337
(6th Cir. 1991), directed that bankruptcy courts should use the
lodestar method.  By the lodestar method, the attorney's reasonable
hourly rate is multiplied by the number of hours reasonably
expended.

The Court held that the services Schafer and Weiner, and Harmon
performed in the Debtor's case up to July 30, 2019, as detailed in
their fee applications, appear to have been performed within a
reasonable amount of time. They also appear to have been necessary
to the administration of this case and were reasonably likely, at
the time they were performed, to provide a benefit to the Debtor's
estate, even though the case eventually failed. Therefore, the
Court finds that the fees requested for those services are
reasonable under the lodestar approach of In re Boddy.

The Court concluded that none of Schafer and Weiner's and Harmon's
services after July 30, 2019 were necessary or beneficial to the
case nor reasonably likely to confer a benefit on the Debtor's
estate.  The Court is not going to compensate the Debtor's
professionals for any of the services that were rendered after July
30, 2019.

At the Nov. 22, 2019, IRS raised these new arguments at that
hearing which it did not raise in the  Objection:

    (1) the Court should abstain from hearing the two fee
applications altogether because the IRS has appealed an earlier
ruling of the Court,
  
    (2) the Court should grant the IRS an administrative expense
and make an indicative ruling under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8008
regarding payment of that administrative expense,

    (3) Schafer and Weiner and Harmon do not need an award of fees
from the Court because they are free to collect their fees directly
from the Debtor without the Court's approval,

    (4) if the Court does award any fees to Schafer and Weiner and
Harmon, it should not approve the language that they requested in
their fee applications that grants them a judgment under Fed. R.
Bankr. P. 7054 for the amounts awarded.  There was no mention of
any of these arguments in the IRS objection.  Schafer and Weiner
and Harmon asked the Court not to consider any of these new
arguments raised orally by the IRS at the hearing because they were
not set forth in writing in the IRS Objection.

"It is a well-established procedural rule in the Sixth Circuit that
failure to raise an argument in a motion acts as a waiver of that
argument." United States v. 2007 BMW 335i Convertible, 648
F.Supp.2d 944, 952 (N.D. Ohio 2009) (citing Scottsdale Ins. Co. v.
Flowers, 513 F.3d 546, 552-53 (6th Cir. 2007)).  Likewise,
arguments not raised in a response or reply are considered waived.
Scottsdale Ins. Co., 513 F.3d at 553. One of the primary purposes
of this rule is to give the other party "a fair opportunity to
respond to all arguments." 2007 BMW, 648 F. Supp. 2d at 953.

Because these arguments were not made in the IRS Objection, the
Court holds that they are waived.  Moreover, the IRS did not
support the new arguments that it orally made at the hearing with
legal authority.  The Court's own research, as well, indicates that
these arguments lack merit.

Accordingly, the Court allowed Schafer and Weiner fees in the
amount of $94,760.50 and costs in the amount of $3,805.49, and
disallowed fees in the amount of $37,891, consisting of all fees
requested for services rendered by Schafer and Weiner after July
30, 2019.  Because the amount disallowed by the Court exceeds the
amount of the reduction agreed to between Schafer and Weiner and
the UST, that agreement is now moot.

The Court allowed Harmon fees in the amount of $33,390 and
disallows fees in the amount of $3,255, consisting of all fees for
services rendered after July 30, 2019.

The Court clarified that in no way does it condone the Debtor's
failure to pay its post-petition taxes and its disregard of its
debtor-in-possession duties. The remedy for the Debtor's conduct is
not to disallow all of the fees for its professionals if the fees
are otherwise compensable, but instead to pursue appropriate
remedies against the parties who are responsible for the Debtor's
non-payment of taxes.

A copy of the opinion dated Dec. 3, 2019 is available at
https://www.leagle.com/decision/inbco20191204524 from Leagle.com.

Kim K. Hillary, Schafer and Weiner, PLLC, 40950 Woodward Avenue,
Suite 100, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304, John J. Stockdale, Jr.,
Schafer and Weiner, PLLC, 40950 Woodward Avenue, Suite 100,
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304, counsel for Central Processing
Services, LLC, Debtor-In-Possession.

Leslie K. Berg , United States Attorney, counsel for Daniel M.
McDermott, U.S. Trustee.  

                  About Central Processing Services

Central Processing Services, LLC, based in Southfield, Mich., is a
provider of printing, mailing and lockbox services in the
fundraising and medical industries.  The Debtor filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-43217) on March 6, 2019.

The case was pending for just about six months.  On August 1, 2019,
the United of America, on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service,
moved to dismiss the Debtor's case, which the Court granted at a
hearing on September 6, 2019.

In the petition signed by Richard T. Cole, authorized member, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets, and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Maria L. Oxholm
oversees the case.  John J. Stockdale, Jr., Esq., at Schaefer and
Weiner, PLLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel, and Harmon Partners,
LLC, is the financial advisor.



CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 22
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware will hold a
hearing on Jan. 22, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time)
to consider the adequacy of the disclosure statement explaining the
proposed joint Chapter 11 prepackaged plan of reorganization of
Clover Technologies Group LLC and its debtor-affiliates.
Objections, if any, are due no later than 5:00 p.m. (Prevailing
Eastern Time) on Jan. 15, 2020.

                   About Clover Technologies

Clover Technologies Group, LLC, et al. --
http://www.clovertech.com/-- collect and recycle electronic
devices and provide aftermarket management services for mobile
device carriers, manufacturers, retailers, insurance providers and
enterprise businesses.  Formed through organic growth and strategic
acquisitions, the Debtors and their non-debtor affiliates operate
repair centers in North America and abroad and provide services in
over 120 countries.

Clover Technologies Group, LLC and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12680) on Dec. 16,
2019.  Clover Technologies was estimated to have $100 million to
$500 million in assets and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP as counsel; KLEHR HARRISON
HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP as local bankruptcy counsel; ALVAREZ & MARSAL
NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a restructuring advisor; JEFFERIES LLC as
investment banker; and BANKRUPTCY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., as
claims agent.


CLOVER TECHNOLOGIES: Jan. 22 Common Stock Transfer Hearing Set
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware will hold a
final hearing on Jan. 22, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (Prevailing Eastern
Time) for the motion for entry of interim and final orders
approving notification and hearing procedures for certain transfers
of and declaration of worthlessness with respect to common stock
filed by Clover Technologies Group LLC and its debtor-affiliates.

                   About Clover Technologies

Clover Technologies Group, LLC, et al. --
http://www.clovertech.com/-- collect and recycle electronic
devices and provide aftermarket management services for mobile
device carriers, manufacturers, retailers, insurance providers and
enterprise businesses.  Formed through organic growth and strategic
acquisitions, the Debtors and their non-debtor affiliates operate
repair centers in North America and abroad and provide services in
over 120 countries.

Clover Technologies Group, LLC and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12680) on Dec. 16,
2019.  Clover Technologies was estimated to have $100 million to
$500 million in assets and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP as counsel; KLEHR HARRISON
HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP as local bankruptcy counsel; ALVAREZ & MARSAL
NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a restructuring advisor; JEFFERIES LLC as
investment banker; and BANKRUPTCY MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC., as
claims agent.


CONSTELLIS HOLDINGS: Moody's Lowers CFR to Ca, Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded its ratings for Constellis
Holdings, LLC, including the company's corporate family rating (to
Ca, from B3) and probability of default rating (to Ca-PD/LD, from
B3-PD), and the ratings for the company's existing senior secured
bank credit facility (first lien to Ca, from B2; second lien to C,
from Caa2). Concurrently, Moody's assigned a B3 rating to the
company's $110 million priority first lien term loan, which was
entered, in conjunction with an amendment to the existing first
lien credit agreement, with a subset of existing first lien lenders
on December 17. The ratings outlook is negative.

RATINGS RATIONALE

"The downgrades follow a limited default on the company's existing
term debt given a missed amortization payment that was due on
December 31, 2019, and more broadly reflect an anticipated
near-term restructuring of Constellis' obligations either through a
consensual agreement with creditors or prepackaged bankruptcy court
proceedings," according to Bruce Herskovics, Moody's lead analyst
for the company.

Notwithstanding what appeared to have been a turn-around in the
company's financial performance, with $25 million of free cash flow
generated in the third quarter, Moody's noted what it believes to
have been a sudden and material outflow of cash and an ensuing
liquidity crunch as the cause of the default and requisite
restructuring. "While revenues had been weaker than expected over
the second half of 2019, they were sequentially flat for several
quarters, making the magnitude of the fourth quarter deficit
surprising," added Herskovics.

The new first priority term loan affords critical near-term
liquidity, but access to the underlying funds will be tightly
controlled and require the company to develop, among other
milestones, a financial restructuring plan. Under such a plan,
Moody's expects substantial losses to be realized for first and
second lien lenders, although new priority first lien lenders would
likely recover quite well given their effectively senior and much
more modest-sized claim, consistent with the terms of the company's
amended intercreditor agreement.

The negative ratings outlook reflects the high perceived likelihood
of a near-term default on all obligations, with a missed interest
payment pursuant to the plan set forth in the new priority first
lien term loan facility and ultimate resolution of the capital
structure still to be determined. Although necessary, Moody's views
the company's planned restructuring and the associated missed
amortization and interest payments as a default event. It is
conceivable, nonetheless, that only the probability of default
rating would be downgraded further (to D, from Ca-PD/LD) to reflect
an uncured interest payment and/or eventual bankruptcy filing, as
other ratings have effectively been benchmarked to estimated
recovery levels given the limited event of default scenario that
has already transpired. Moody's will remove the "/LD" designation
in three days and would likely withdraw its ratings if the company
files for bankruptcy.

Upward rating movement would depend on restoration of the liquidity
situation with lower potential for missed interest payments and/or
financial restructuring. Downward rating movement could follow a
revision of Moody's expectation to weaker loan recovery rates or a
bankruptcy filing.

The following is a summary of Moody's rating actions and current
ratings for Constellis Holdings, LLC:

Downgrades:

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Ca from B3

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Ca-PD/LD from B3-PD

  Senior Secured 1st Lien Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to
  Ca (LGD3) from B2 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured 2nd Lien Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to
  C (LGD5) from Caa2 (LGD5)

Assignments:

  Senior Secured Gtd Priority 1st Lien Term Loan, Assigned
  B3 (LGD1)

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, Negative

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Aerospace and
Defense Industry published in March 2018.

Constellis is a provider of essential risk management services,
including security, training and global support services to
government and commercial clients throughout the world. Revenues
for the twelve months ended September 30, 2019 were about $1.7
billion. The company is majority-owned by entities of Apollo Global
Management LLC.


CORAL REEF: Seeks to Hire Schafer and Weiner as counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Coralreef Productions, Inc., seek authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to employ
Schafer and Weiner, PLLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Coralreef Productions requires Schafer and Weiner to represent and
provide legal services to the Debtor in connection with the Chapter
11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Schafer and Weiner will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Daniel J. Weiner        $485
     Michael E. Baum         $485
     Howard Borin            $395
     Joseph K. Grekin        $380
     Leon Mayer              $305
     Kim Hillary             $330
     John Stockdale          $345
     Jeffery J. Sattler      $315
     Jason Weiner            $310
     Nicholas Marcus         $275
     Legal Assistant         $150

Schafer and Weiner received $14,000 from the Debtor prior to the
Petition Date.

Schafer and Weiner will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Leon N. Mayer, partner of Schafer and Weiner, PLLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Schafer and Weiner can be reached at:

     Leon N. Mayer, Esq.
     SCHAFER AND WEINER, PLLC
     40950 Woodward Ave., Suite 100
     Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
     Tel: (248) 540-3340
     E-mail: lnmayer@schaferandweiner.com

                 About Coralreef Productions

Nine9 -- https://nine9.com -- is a casting agency that helps models
and actors advance their careers in the entertainment industry. The
opportunities range from television, film, commercial, music video,
runway, print, and promotional castings and gigs.

Coralreef Productions, Inc., based in Bingham Farms, MI, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 19-56749) on Nov.
26, 2019.  In the petition signed by Anthony Toma, president, the
Debtor was estimated to have $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1
million to $10 million in liabilities. The Hon. Thomas J. Tucker is
the presiding judge.  Leon N. Mayer, Esq., at Schafer and Weiner,
PLLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.



CORALREEF PRODUCTIONS: Gets DIP Loan by Charging Insider’s Card
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Coralreef Productions, Inc., uses the personal credit cards of its
president, Anthony Toma to pay for advertising, food, gas, office
supplies and travel-related expenses incurred in the operation of
its business.  The Debtor charges approximately $80,000 monthly on
Mr. Toma's American Express Platinum Card and approximately $3,000
to $5,000 monthly on his American Express Gold Card.  Mr. Toma
lends his platinum card and gold card to the Debtor on an unsecured
basis.  The Debtor would later repay Mr. Toma by paying the bill
for the Platinum Card and the Gold Card directly to American
Express.  Since the credit limit on the Platinum Card is only
$22,500, and the credit limit on the Gold Card is $4,500, the
Debtor needs to make payments on these two cards almost daily.

In order to continue its business operations during the pendency of
its Chapter 11 case, the Debtor asked permission from the
Bankruptcy Court to continue this arrangement of obtaining credit
post-petition.  A copy of the motion can be accessed for free at
https://is.gd/g1akZa from PacerMonitor.com.

At the Dec. 16, 2019 hearing on the motion, Mr. Toma (upon advise
of Debtor's counsel to the Court that Mr. Toma would not use his
American Express Platinum Card or his American Express Gold Card
for personal purposes) advised the Debtor's counsel that for daily
living purposes he needs to continue charging his personal expenses
to the American Express Gold Card.

The Debtor, in agreement with the Internal Revenue Service to
resolve this matter suggested to add to the language of the
proposed order, among others, that the Debtor is only authorized to
make post-petition charges solely for business purposes to Mr.
Toma's American Express Platinum Card (and not to his American
Express Gold Card).  The Court would later rule that Mr. Toma is
prohibited from charging any of his personal expenses to his
American Express Platinum Card, but is authorized to continue using
his American Express Gold Card for personal purposes.

The Debtor also suggested changing the maximum DIP Loan balance
from $27,000 to $22,500.  A copy of the consent document concerning
this agreement is available at https://is.gd/5WvpEa  from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Accordingly, the Court entered an order authorizing the Debtor to
charge its business expenses to Mr. Toma's American Express
Platinum Card, on an interim basis, until the earlier of:

(a) February 28, 2020,

(b) a date specified in a supplemental agreement as to the DIP
Loan between Debtor and the IRS, or

(c) a date specified in an order of the Court terminating the
agreement.

The Court further ruled that:

   (a) the Debtor must provide evidence to the IRS that all charges
that were made to the Platinum card were solely for the Debtor's
business expenses (and not any administrative fees, finance
charges, or late fees), before the Debtor makes any payments on the
Platinum Card;

   (b) any unauthorized fees, charges, or other amounts related to
the Platinum Card will be the sole and personal responsibility of
Anthony Toma and will not constitute an administrative claim
against Debtor;

   (c) the payments on the Platinum Card must be made directly from
the Debtor to the card servicer only as part of the DIP loan;

   (d) the DIP loan balance must not exceed $22,500.

The Court directed the Debtor to pay the IRS the aggregate sum of
$9,641, as follows: (a) $4,821 on Friday, January 17, 2020, and (b)
$4,820 on Monday, February 17, 2020, to be credited against the
Debtor’s pre-petition debt to the IRS.  

A copy of the interim order is available at https://is.gd/CHHinY
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                 About Coralreef Productions

Coralreef Productions, Inc., dba Nine9, dba Nine9 the Unagency, dba
One Source Talent -- https://nine9.com -- is a casting agency that
helps models and actors advance their careers in the entertainment
industry.  The opportunities range from television, film,
commercial, music video, runway, print, and promotional castings
and gigs.

The company filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
19-56749) on Nov. 26, 2019 in Detroit, Michigan.  In the petition
signed by Anthony Toma, president, the Debtor estimated between
$100,000 and $500,000 in assets, and between $1 million and $10
million in liabilities.  Judge Thomas J. Tucker is assigned to the
case.  Schafer and Weiner, PLLC is the Debtor's counsel.  


CREATIVE GLOBAL: May Borrow from CEO on Unsecured Basis
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Sandra R. Klein authorized Creative Global Investment Inc.,
to borrow up to $20,000 on a general unsecured basis from the
Debtor's chairman, chief executive officer and sole shareholder,
Dong Yeoun Lee.  

The loan is intended to cover shortfalls in the Debtor's budget.  A
copy of the order is available for free at https://is.gd/tfg4fs
from PacerMonitor.com.

                About Creative Global Investment

Creative Global Investment Inc. is a privately held company engaged
in financial investment activities.  Creative Global Investment
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-13044) on March 20, 2019.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor disclosed $36,691 in assets and $5,388,873 in
liabilities.  The case has been assigned to Judge Sandra R. Klein.
Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP is the Debtor's legal
counsel.


CREATIVE REALITIES: Secures $2-Mil. Special Loan from Slipstream
----------------------------------------------------------------
Creative Realities, Inc., entered into a Seventh Amendment to Loan
and Security Agreement on Dec. 30, 2019, with its subsidiaries and
Slipstream Communications, LLC ("Lender").  Pursuant to the Seventh
Amendment, the Lender made a $2,000,000 loan to the Company under
the terms of the Company's existing Loan and Security Agreement
with the Lender.  The Company used $1,100,000 of the Special Loan
proceeds to extinguish an approximately $2,700,000 accrued expense
owed by the Company and its subsidiary, ConeXus World Global, LLC,
to a vendor.

The Special Loan is evidenced by a Secured Convertible Special Loan
Promissory Note.  The Note bears simple interest at 8% per annum,
of which 6% is payable in cash, which is payable monthly commencing
Feb. 1, 2020.  The entire unpaid principal balance of the Note
(including the Additional Principal) together with all accrued but
unpaid interest is due on June 30, 2021.  The Company may prepay
the Note, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time,
without penalty or premium.  The principal (including the
Additional Principal) and accrued but unpaid interest will be
converted into a new class of senior preferred stock of the Company
upon any event of default or in the event that the Company does not
refinance the Note prior to Oct. 1, 2020, with such class of senior
preferred stock of the Company to be created in advance of such
conversion, having those rights and preferences set forth in the
Loan Agreement and as otherwise agreed to by the Company and the
Lender.

                     About Creative Realities

Creative Realities, Inc. -- www.cri.com -- is a Minnesota
corporation that provides innovative digital marketing technology
and solutions to retail companies, individual retail brands,
enterprises and organizations throughout the United States and in
certain international markets.  The Company has expertise in a
broad range of existing and emerging digital marketing
technologies, as well as the related media management and
distribution software platforms and networks, device management,
product management, customized software service layers, systems,
experiences, workflows, and integrated solutions.

The Company reported a net loss of $10.62 million in 2018 following
a net loss of $6.95 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the
Company had $34.93 million in total assets, $17.03 million in total
liabilities, and $17.89 million in total shareholders' equity.

"Management believes that, based on (i) the extension of the
maturity date on our term loan and revolving loans and (ii) our
operational forecast through 2020, we can continue as a going
concern through at least November 8, 2020.  However, given our
historical net losses, cash used in operating activities and
working capital deficit, we obtained a continued support letter
from Slipstream through November 15, 2020.  We can provide no
assurance that our ongoing operational efforts will be successful
which could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and cash flows," the Company said in its Quarterly
Report for the period ended Sept. 30, 2019.


CTI INDUSTRIES: Inks $5M Stock Purchase Deal with LF International
------------------------------------------------------------------
CTI Industries Corporation entered into a stock purchase agreement,
pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell, and LF
International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore private limited company,
agreed to purchase, up to 500,000 shares of the Company's newly
created Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, no par value per
share, with each share of Series A Preferred initially convertible
into ten shares of the Company's common stock, at a purchase price
of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $5,000,000.
The Purchase Agreement contemplates two separate closings, each of
which will be for the purchase and sale of 250,000 shares of Series
A Preferred, and each of which will be subject to certain closing
conditions.  The first closing of the Offering is subject to
customary terms and conditions as well as specific conditions and
has not occurred as of Jan. 3, 2020.  In the event certain
conditions to the second closing (which include the Name Change)
and the Company becoming current in its filing obligations with the
Securities and Exchange Commission) do not occur within 135 days,
the Purchase Agreement will terminate.

                   Certificate of Designation

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on or prior to the first
closing, the Company shall file a Certificate of Designation with
the Secretary of State of Illinois to designate 700,000 shares of
Series A Preferred with a stated value of $10.00 per share.

Under the Series A Certificate of Designation, holders of the
Series A Preferred will be entitled to receive quarterly dividends
at the annual rate of 8% of the stated value.  Such dividends may
be paid in cash or in shares of common stock in the Company's
discretion.  In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or
winding up of the Company, the holders of record of shares of
Series A Preferred will be entitled to receive, in preference to
any distribution to the holders of the Company's other equity
securities (including the Company's common stock), a liquidation
preference equal to $10 per share plus all accrued and unpaid
dividends.

Each holder of Series A Preferred shall have the right to convert
the stated value of such shares, as well as accrued but unpaid
declared dividends thereon into shares of the Company's common
stock.  The number of shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Conversion Amount shall equal the Conversion
Amount divided by the conversion price of $1.00, subject to certain
customary adjustments.  The Series A Preferred may not be converted
to common stock to the extent such conversion would result in the
holder beneficially owning more than 4.99% of the Company's
outstanding common stock.

Holders of Series A Preferred shall vote together with the holders
of the Company's common stock on an as-if-converted basis, whereby
each share of Series A Preferred will be entitled to 10 votes,
subject to adjustment.  In addition, so long as there are more than
50,000 shares of the Series A Preferred outstanding, the Company
will be prohibited from taking certain actions without the consent
of the holders of at least 80% of the outstanding shares of Series
A Preferred.  In addition, the Company shall not, without the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
then-outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred, amend its
Article of Incorporation, the Series A Certificate of Designation
or the by-laws of the Company in any manner to decrease the number
of authorized shares of common stock or in any manner that would
otherwise adversely affect the rights, preferences or privileges of
the holders of the Series A Preferred, except for an amendment to
increase the number of authorized shares of common stock.  The
voting and conversion rights of the Series A Preferred will be
restricted prior to the affirmative vote of holders of a majority
of the common stock approving the Offering.

                      Director Appointment

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Investor shall be entitled
to appoint and elect one member to the Company's Board of Directors
and to remove or replace any such member of the Board and,
effective as of the first closing, the Board of Directors of the
Company shall appoint the individual designated by the Investor as
member of the Board, to serve until his/her successor is duly
elected and qualified.

                         Name Change

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on or prior to the second
closing, the Company shall file an amendment to its Articles of
Incorporation to change the Company's name from CTI Industries
Corporation to Yunhong CTI Ltd.

                    Forbearance Agreement

On Dec. 14, 2017, the Company entered into a Revolving Credit, Term
Loan and Security Agreement with PNC Bank, National Association.
Currently, multiple events of default under the Loan Agreement have
occurred.  Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on or prior to the
first closing, the Company shall enter into a Limited Waiver,
Consent, Amendment No. 5 and Forbearance Agreement with Lender,
pursuant to which Lender shall agree to (i) waive the Loan
Agreement's requirement that the Company apply the net proceeds of
the Offering first to the Term Loans (as defined in the Loan
Agreement), and agree that the Company shall instead apply the net
proceeds of the Offering to the Revolving Advances (as defined in
the Loan Agreement) and in connection therewith the Revolving
Commitment Amount (as defined in the Loan Agreement) shall be
reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the amount so applied to
the Revolving Advances, and (ii) forebear from exercising the
rights and remedies in respect of the Existing Defaults afforded to
Lender under the Loan Agreement for a period ending no later than
Dec. 31, 2020.

                         New Auditor

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on or prior to the first
closing, the Company will agreed to engage a PCAOBqualified,
independent registered accounting firm, subject to the Investor's
approval.

                      Placement Agent Fees

In connection with the Offering and in consideration of certain
services provided to the Company, upon each closing, the Company
shall pay the placement agent a fee equal to 10% of the gross
proceeds received by the Company from the Offering and issue
placement agent warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common
stock in an amount equal to 10% of the common stock issuable upon
conversion of the Series A Preferred sold in the Offering at an
exercise price of $1.00 per share.

           Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant

On Jan. 3, 2020, the Audit Committee of the Board approved the
engagement of RBSM, LLP as the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm for the Company's fiscal year ended Dec. 31,
2019, effective immediately.

During the fiscal years ended Dec. 31, 2018, and 2017, and the
subsequent interim periods through Jan. 3, 2020, neither the
Company nor anyone acting on its behalf has consulted with RBSM
regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a
specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of
audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial
statements or the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, and neither a written report or oral advice was provided
to the Company that RBSM concluded was an important factor
considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any
accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue, (ii) any matter
that was the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item
304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K, or (iii) any reportable event
within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
     
                     President & CEO Appointment

On Jan. 2, 2020, the Board appointed Mr. Frank Cesario, the
Company's chief financial officer and acting chief executive
officer, as the Company's president and chief executive officer.

Mr. Cesario was appointed as acting chief executive officer on Dec.
5, 2019.  Since Nov. 20, 2017, Mr. Cesario has been employed by the
Company as chief financial officer.  Prior to joining the Company,
Mr. Cesario served in similar roles with Nanophase Technologies
Corporation and ISCO International, Inc., publicly traded global
suppliers of advanced materials and telecommunications equipment,
respectively, as well as Turf Ventures LLC, a privately held
chemicals distributor.  He began his career with KPMG Peat Marwick
and then served in progressively responsible finance positions
within Material Sciences Corporation and Outokumpu Copper, Inc.
Mr. Cesario holds an MBA (Finance) from DePaul University and a
B.S. (Accountancy) from the University of Illinois, and is a
registered CPA in the State of Illinois.

                       About CTI Industries

CTI Industries Corporation (www.ctiindustries.com), its United
Kingdom subsidiary (CTI Balloons Limited), its Mexican subsidiary
(Flexo Universal, S. de R.L. de C.V.), its German subsidiary (CTI
Europe GmbH) and CTI Supply, Inc. (i) design, manufacture and
distribute metalized and latex balloon products throughout the
world and (ii) operate systems for the production, lamination,
coating and printing of films used for food packaging and other
commercial uses and for conversion of films to flexible packaging
containers and other products.

CTI reported a net loss of $3.74 million in 2018 following a net
loss of $1.78 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, CTI had
$32.90 million in total assets, $28.16 million in total current
liabilities, $2.79 million in total long-term liabilities, and
$1.95 million in total equity.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, in Chicago, Illinois, the Company's auditor
since 2007, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 15, 2019, on the consolidated financial statements fo
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has suffered
net losses from operations and liquidity limitations that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


CUKER INTERACTIVE: Taps Squar Milner as Accountant
--------------------------------------------------
Cuker Interactive, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of California to employ Squar
Milner, LLP as its accountant.

The firm will render these services:

     a. identify, evaluate and investigate the Debtor's books,
records and computer or electronically stored information;

     b. provide analysis and consulting services regarding the
Debtor's finances and accounting;

     c. provide consulting and litigation services regarding the
administration of the Debtor's Chapter 11 case and ongoing business
operations;

     d. advise the Debtor regarding its bankruptcy estate's tax
liabilities and assist in the preparation of its annual tax
returns;

     e. evaluate and analyze any proposed plan of reorganization,
including review and development of any bankruptcy-related
schedules and documents;

     f. provide other forensic accounting, professional tax
services and consulting services.

Stacy Elledge Chiang, a certified public accountant employed with
Squar Milner, will be primarily responsible for providing the
services.  Her hourly fee is $395.

Ms. Elledge Chiang disclosed in a court filing that the firm is
"disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Stacy Elledge Chiang, CPA
     Squar Milner LLP
     3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 300
     San Diego, CA 92122
     Phone: 858.597.4100
     Fax: 858.597.4111
     Email: schiang@squarmilner.com

                    About Cuker Interactive

Cuker Interactive, LLC -- https://www.cukeragency.com/ -- is a
digital marketing, design, and eCommerce agency.  

Based in Carlsbad, Calif., Cuker Interactive filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 18-07363) on Dec. 13, 2018. In
the petition signed by CEO Aaron Cuker, the Debtor estimated $10
million to $50 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  Michael D. Breslauer, Esq., at Solomon Ward
Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


DEAN FOODS: Seeks to Hire Davis Polk as Attorney
------------------------------------------------
Southern Foods Group, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas
to employ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, as attorney to the Debtors.

Southern Foods requires Davis Polk to:

   (a) prepare on behalf of the Debtors all necessary or
       appropriate motions, applications, answers, orders,
       reports and other papers in connection with the
       administration of the Debtors' estates;

   (b) counsel the Debtors with regard to their rights and
       obligations as debtors in possession and their powers and
       duties in the continued management and operation of
       their businesses and properties;

   (c) provide advice, representation and preparation of
       necessary documentation and pleadings and take all
       necessary or appropriate actions in connection with debt
       restructuring, statutory bankruptcy issues, postpetition
       financing, if any, strategic transactions, securities
       laws, real estate, employee benefits, environmental,
       business and commercial litigation, and corporate and tax
       matters;

   (d) take all necessary or appropriate actions to protect and
       preserve the Debtors' estates, including the prosecution
       of actions on the Debtors' behalf, the defense of any
       actions commenced against the Debtors, the negotiation of
       disputes in which the Debtors are involved and the
       preparation of objections to claims filed against the
       Debtors' estates;

   (e) take all necessary and appropriate actions in connection
       with any potential sale of all or substantially all of the
       Debtor's assets;

   (f) take all necessary or appropriate actions in connection
       with any chapter 11 plan, all related disclosure
       statements and all related documents and such further
       actions as may be required in connection with the
       administration of the Debtors' estates; and

   (g) act as general bankruptcy counsel for the Debtors and
       perform all other necessary or appropriate legal services
       in connection with the chapter 11 cases.

Davis Polk will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                     $1,295-$1,645
     Counsel                      $1,225
     Associates                   $525-$1,075
     Paraprofessionals            $305-$425

In the 12 months prior to the Petition Date, Davis Polk received
payments from the Debtors totaling $5,866,501.96. Prior to the
Petition Date, on October 3, 2019, October 22, 2019, and November
8, 2019, the Debtors provided Davis Polk with advance payments of
$500,000, $1,000,000, and $2,000,000, respectively, to establish
and maintain a retainer, the current balance of which is
approximately $1,449,600.97.

Davis Polk will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, the
following is provided in response to the request for additional
information:

   Question:  Did you agree to any variations from, or
              alternatives to, your standard or customary billing
              arrangements for this engagement?

   Response:  Davis Polk has agreed to negotiated discounts off
              of its standard rates.

   Question:  Do any of the professionals included in this
              engagement vary their rate based on the geographic
              location of the bankruptcy case?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  If you represented the client in the 12 months
              prepetition, disclose your billing rates and
              material financial terms for the prepetition
              engagement, including any adjustments during the 12
              months prepetition. If your billing rates and
              material financial terms have changed postpetition,
              explain the difference and the reasons for the
              difference.

   Response:  Not applicable.

   Question:  Has your client approved your prospective budget
              and staffing plan, and, if so for what budget
              period?

   Response:  Davis Polk intends to provide a prospective budget
              and staffing plan for the period from the Petition
              Date through February 29, 2020 to the Debtors and
              will continue to work with the Debtors on the
              budget and staffing plan.

Brian M. Resnick, partner of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Davis Polk can be reached at:

     Brian M. Resnick, Esq.
     Steven Z. Szanzer, Esq.
     Nate Sokol, Esq.
     Daniel E. Meyer, Esq.
     DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
     450 Lexington Avenue
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: (212) 450-4000
     Fax: (212) 701-5800
     E-mail: brian.resnick@davispolk.com
             steven.szanzer@davispolk.com
             nathaniel.sokol@davispolk.com
             daniel.meyer@davispolk.com

                   About Southern Foods Group

Southern Foods Group, LLC, d/b/a Dean Foods, is a food and beverage
company and a processor and direct-to-store distributor of fresh
fluid milk and other dairy and dairy case products in the United
States.

The Company and its 40+ affiliates filed for bankruptcy protection
on Nov. 12, 2019 (Bankr. S.D. Texas, Lead Case No. 19-36313). The
petitions were signed by Gary Rahlfs, senior vice president and
chief financial officer. Judge David Jones presides over the
cases.

The Debtors posted estimated assets and liabilities of $1 billion
to $10 billion.

David Polk & Wardell LLP serves as general bankruptcy counsel to
the Debtors, and Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP serves as local
counsel. Alvarez Marsal is financial advisor to the Debtors,
Evercore Group LLC is investment banker, and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring LLC is notice and claims agent.



DESERT LAND: Trustee Hires Colliers, Keen-Summit, as Brokers
------------------------------------------------------------
Kavita Gupta, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Desert Land, LLC, and its
debtor-affiliates, seek authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Nevada to employ Keen-Summit Capital Partners
LLC, as broker to the Trustee.

Kavita Gupta (the "Trustee"), the duly appointed and acting Chapter
11 trustee for Desert Land, LLC ("DL"), Desert Oasis Apartments,
LLC ("DOA" and together with DL, the "Debtors"), hereby moves and
seeks authority to the Court ("Motion"), for entry of an order
approving an agreement ("Retention Agreement") between the Trustee,
Colliers Nevada, LLC dba Colliers International ("Colliers"), and
Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC ("Keen-Summit" and together with
Colliers, the "Broker") to retain Broker for the marketing and
auction of multiple parcels of real property encumbered by liens
asserted by Shotgun Creek Investments, LLC and its affiliates
("Shotgun Entities") owned by DL, and a parcel of real property
owned by DOA subject to a lien held by Northern Trust Company
("Northern Trust").

The Retention Agreement obligates Brad Busbin, trustee for the
Gonzales Charitable Remainder Unitrust One ("Gonzales Trust") and
the Shotgun Entities to advance a total of $100,000 toward
advertising and other marketing costs related to the auction.  The
Gonzales Trust and the Shotgun Entities will only agree to advance
these funds if they are granted liens on the property to be
auctioned.

DOA owns approximately 6.31 acres of vacant land commonly known as
5316 Danville Lane/5333 Bethel Lane, Las Vegas, Nevada, Clark
County Assessor Parcel No. 162-28-310-001 (the "DOA Property").

DL owns several parcels of partially developed real property that
in the aggregate total approximately 20.47 acres, all of such
parcels are encumbered by liens asserted by the Shotgun Entities
("DL Property").

Pursuant to prior orders of the Court, the DL Property and DOA
Property were listed for sale by Colliers from August 2018 through
approximately October 18, 2019. The Trustee, after consultation
with the Shotgun Entities, Northern Trust, and the Gonzales Trust,
has determined that it is in the best interests of the DL and DOA
estates to enter into the Retention Agreement with Colliers and
Keen-Summit to jointly market and run an auction process for the DL
Property and DOA Property.

The Brokers will be paid 1.7% commission if the Properties are sold
to a third party. An additional .25% commission will be paid to a
broker representing a third-party buyer that purchases all or part
of the Properties.

The Brokers will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

To the best of the Debtors' knowledge the firms are a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their estates.

Keen-Summit Capital can be reached at:

     Harold Bordwin
     KEEN-SUMMIT CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
     1 Huntington Quadrangle, Suite 2C04
     Melville, NY 11747
     Telephone: (646) 381-9202

          - and

     Mike Mixer
     Colliers Nevada, LLC
     dba Colliers International
     3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 150
     Las Vegas, NV 89169
     Tel: (702) 735-5700

                      About Desert Land

On April 30, 2018, Tom Gonzales commenced an involuntary petition
for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code against Desert
Land, LLC. The petitioning creditor was Bradley J. Busbin, trustee
for the Gonzales Charitable Remainder Unitrust One. Jamie P. Dreher
-- jdreher@downeybrand.com -- of Downey Brand LLP represents the
Trustee.

The court ordered the conversion of the Chapter 7 case to a case
under Chapter 11 on June 28, 2018 (Bankr. D. Nevada, Lead Case No.
18-12454). The Debtor's affiliates are Desert Oasis Apartments LLC,
Desert Oasis Investments, LLC, and Skyvue Las Vegas LLC.

Schwartzer & McPherson Law Firm serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.  Curtis Ensign, PLLC, is special litigation counsel, and
Gordon Law is special labor counsel.


DIJA HOLDINGS: Unsecureds to Get 100% With Interest in 15 Years
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Dija Holdings, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of North Dakota a third amended disclosure statement
describing its plan of reorganization.

The Class III claims are the allowed general unsecured claims of DW
Excavating Services, Keogh Law Office, Carquest, Ryerson Concrete
LLC, and Norm Friedland. The creditors will be paid 100% of the
total amount of the allowed claims.  The principal balance of
$114,066.40 owed to the Class III creditors will be amortized over
15 years with interest accruing at the Federal Judgment Rate and
payable in equal monthly installments beginning on the Effective
Date through December 13, 2024.  The projected monthly payment is
$713.21. The Reamortized Principal will be paid over 18 months with
interest accruing at the Federal Judgment, with the first payment
commencing on January 13, 2025. The estimated monthly payment is
$4,524.77.

The Class IV creditor is the membership interest of Debtor's sole
member, Jason Gillen. Mr. Gillen shall retain his membership
interest and is unimpaired. He will receive no ownership draws or
salary pending satisfaction of Class II Creditor's Allowed Claim.

The feasibility of the Debtor's Plan of Reorganization is based on
continuing to lease the Real Property to Westex Oilfield Services
or another tenant with a triple net lease with monthly payments
equal to or exceeding $7,250 per month.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at https://tinyurl.com/qoh4xgv from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

         PATTEN, PETERMAN, BEKKEDAHL & GRBEN, PLLC
         Molly S. Considine
         2817 N. 2nd Ave Ste. 300
         PO Box 1239
         Billings, MT 59103-1239
         Tel: (406) 252-8500
         Fax: (406) 294-9500
         E-mail : rncongidine@lppbglaw.com

                      About Dija Holdings

Dija Holdings, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.D. Case No. 19-30408) on July 18, 2019.
In the petition signed by Jason Gillen, managing member, Dija
Holdings was estimated to have assets of less than $500,000 and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  The case has been assigned to
Judge Shon Hastings.  Dija Holdings is represented by Patten,
Peterman, Bekkedahl & Green PLLC.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


ECOCAST INVESTMENTS: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ecocast Investments, Inc.
        620 N. Houston Ave.
        Humble, TX

Business Description: Ecocast Investments, Inc. classifies its
                      business as Single Asset Real Estate as
                      defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 6, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas

Case No.: 20-30108

Debtor's Counsel: Arne M. Ray, Esq.
                  RAY AND ASSOCIATES
                  5100 Westheimer, Suite 115
                  Houston, TX 77056
                  Tel: (713) 627-7111
             
Total Assets: $2,500,000

Total Liabilities: $1,529,164

The petition was signed by Roger D. Crooks, manager.
               
The Debtor lists Arne M. Ray as its sole unsecured creditor holding
an unliquidated claim for attorney fees.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                    https://is.gd/LqiJnJ


ED3 CONSULTANTS: Seeks to Hire Smart Business as Consultant
-----------------------------------------------------------
ED3 Consultants, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to employ Smart
Business Doctor, LLC, as consultant to the Debtor.

ED3 Consultants requires Smart Business to:

   (a) provide organization and growth management services,
       including workflow, efficiencies of scale and reporting;

   (b) create a financial management system for profit and loss,
       cash flow management, key performance indicators,
       invoicing timely and accurately, budgeting and financial
       accountability; and

   (c) provide such other consulting and financial management
       services as may be necessary and appropriate in connection
       with the case.

Smart Business will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Smart Business can be reached at:

     Smart Business Doctor, LLC
     5677 Transit Road, Suite 212
     Lockport, NY 14094
     Tel: (850) 276-9245

                    About ED3 Consultants

Based in Canonsburg, Pa., ED3 Consultants Inc. is a small
woman-owned business staffed with engineering, architectural and
technical specialists.

ED3 Consultants filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-24455) on
Nov. 14, 2019.  In the petition signed by Denise L. Palmer,
president, the Debtor was estimated to have $500,001 to $1 million
in assets and $1,000,001 to $10 million in liabilities.  Guy C.
Fustine, Esq., at Knox McLaughlin Gornall & Sennett, P.C., is the
Debtor's counsel.


EDUCATION CORPORATION: Involuntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
----------------------------------------------------------
Alleged Debtor: Education Corporation of America
                3600 Grandview Parkway
                Birmingham, AL 35243

Business Description: Education Corporation of America,
                      headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama, was a
                      privately held company that operated
                      proprietary colleges across the United
                      States.  The Company provided educational
                      programs in business, administrative,
                      management, medical, and technical.

Involuntary Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 6, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware

Case No: 20-10034

Judge: Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon

Petitioners' Counsel: Jeremy W. Ryan, Esq.
                      POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
                      1313 N. Market Street, Sixth Floor
                      Wilmington, DE 19801
                      Tel: (302) 984-6000
                      E-mail: jryan@potteranderson.com

Alleged creditors who signed the involuntary petition:

  Name                               Nature of Claim  Claim Amount
  ----                               ---------------  ------------
Monroe Capital Private                Lender Under      $1,505,143
Credit Fund II LP                         Loan         such amount
311 S. Wacker Drive, 64th Floor         Facility      is partially
Chicago, IL 60606                                          secured

Reputation Partners LLC                 Services           $55,872
30 W. Monroe Street, Suite 1410
Chicago, IL 60603

BSF Richmond, LP                     Rent and Related   $1,405,044
c/o Bond Companies                       Charges
350 W. Hubbard Street
Chicago, IL 60654

A full-text copy of the Involuntary Petition is available for free
at PacerMonitor.com at:

                       https://is.gd/CfEgv0


ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Unsecureds to Have 15% Recovery Over 5 Years
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Electronic Service Products Corporation filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut, New Haven
Division, a third amended chapter 11 disclosure statement.

Class # 3 - General Unsecured Creditors (including secured claims
deemed to be wholly or partially unsecured (claim #2) under Sec.
506). Class #3 also includes Proof of Claim No. 2, which is a
wholly unsecured claim. Total General Unsecured Creditors Debt - $
1,522,813.75. Payments for unsecured creditors will begin on March
1, 2020, and continue through February 1, 2025.

Payments to unsecured creditors will be distributed on a monthly
basis for most creditors.  If a monthly payment will be less than
$100 the payment will be aggregated and be made on a quarterly
basis for the convenience of both the Debtor and Creditor.
Unsecured creditors will receive a 15% payment of their respective
debts.  Payments will be made monthly, payments will commence March
1, 2020, and continue for a total of 60 payments, unless the Court
orders otherwise.

William Hrubiak is the sole equity holder and intends on retaining
his interest.  He is unimpaired.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
monthly operating surplus as it is generated from the ongoing
business activities of the Debtor.

The Debtor's financial projections show that the Debtor will have
an average monthly cash flow, after paying operating expenses and
post-confirmation taxes, of $9,000.  The final Plan payment is
expected to be paid on Jan. 1, 2025.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at https://tinyurl.com/u9bjyd3 from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

       William E. Carter, Esq.
       658 Broad Street
       Meriden, CT 06450
       Tel: 203-630-1070

              About Electronic Service Products

Founded in 1992, Electronic Service Products Corporation is engaged
in the wholesale distribution of electronic parts and electronic
communications equipment.

Electronic Service Products filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Conn. Case No. 17-30704) on May 12, 2017. In the petition signed by
William Hrubiec, its president, the Debtor was estimated to have
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities. The case is assigned to Judge Ann M. Nevins. The
Debtor tapped William E. Carter, Esq., at the Law Office of William
E. Carter, LLC, as counsel.


EMERGE ENERGY: Hires PricewaterhouseCoopers as Tax Advisors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Emerge Energy Services LP, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
employ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as tax advisor to the Debtor.

Emerge Energy Services LP requires PricewaterhouseCoopers to:

   a. Accounting Advisory Services:

     (i) provide generic advice on the requirements of ASC 852,
         Reorganizations, and other technical accounting matters
         that may arise as a result of the chapter 11 petition or
         GAAP reporting requirements;

     (ii) review and comment on management's analysis in
          determining whether transactions meet the relevant
          criteria for a particular accounting treatment, or
          provide generic, illustrative examples to transactions
          that do not fall into the two part criteria set
          by the standard;

     (iii) provide generic examples of financial statement format
           and disclosure requirements of accounting standards
           and/or commenting on a draft financial statements and
           related disclosures;

     (iv) review and comment on white papers and technical
          accounting material on contracts, accounting analysis,
          and example disclosures prepared by the Debtors;
          comment on the nature of the journal entries that may
          be applicable under ASC 852;

     (v) provide high-level advice and industry experience on the
         Potential nature of accounting issues, common pitfalls,
         timelines and key areas impacted which related to
         similar company transaction(s); and

     (vi) comment on potential other accounting standards that
          are generally applicable when applying ASC 852-10
          (collectively, the "Accounting Advisory Services"); and

   b. Valuation Advisory Services:

     (i) provide advice on generic industry standard practice on
         valuation methodologies; provide advice generic industry
         data, valuation factors, and other information about
         "market comparable";

     (ii) provide generic training on valuation skills and
          Methodologies.

PricewaterhouseCoopers will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partner/Principal            $994
     Managing Director            $949
     Director                     $865
     Senior Manager               $769
     Manager                      $674
     Senior Associate             $554
     Associate                    $483
     Administrative Assistance    $129

PricewaterhouseCoopers will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Christopher S. LaGrone, partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

PricewaterhouseCoopers can be reached at:

     Christopher S. LaGrone
     PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
     300 Madison Avenu
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: (647) 471-3000

              About Emerge Energy Services LP

Emerge Energy Services LP -- http://www.emergelp.com/-- is engaged
in the mining, processing and distributing silica sand, a key input
for the hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells.  The Debtors
conduct their mining and processing operations from facilities
located in Wisconsin and Texas. In addition to mining and
processing silica sand primarily for use in the oil and gas
industry, the Debtors also, to a lesser degree, sell their sand for
use in building products and foundry operations. Emerge Energy was
formed in 2012 by management and affiliates of Insight Equity
Management Company LLC and its affiliated investment funds.

Emerge Energy Services and its affiliates protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11563)
on July 15, 2019.

As of Sept. 30, 2018, the Debtors had total assets of $329,385,000
and total liabilities of $266,077,000.

The Debtors tapped Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. and Latham &
Watkins LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc. as
financial advisor; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims
and noticing agent and administrative advisor.  The Debtors also
hired Ankura Consulting Group LLC to provide interim management
services.


F & T SPIRITS: Hires Middlebrooks Shapiro as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
F & T Spirits Enterprises, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to employ
Middlebrooks Shapiro, P.C., as counsel to the Debtor.

F&T Spirits requires Middlebrooks Shapiro to:

   a. assist the Debtor in the preparation of the Chapter 11
      petition, schedules and statement of financial affairs;

   b. represent at the initial Debtor interview;

   c. appear at the 341(a) meeting of creditors;

   d. prepare required pleadings in relation to the bankruptcy
      proceedings.

Middlebrooks Shapiro will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys               $250 to $400
     Paralegals                   $90

Middlebrooks Shapiro will be paid a retainer in the amount of
$11,750, plus $1,717 filing fee.

Middlebrooks Shapiro will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Melinda D. Middlebrooks, partner of Middlebrooks Shapiro, P.C.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Middlebrooks Shapiro can be reached at:

     Melinda D. Middlebrooks, Esq.
     MIDDLEBROOKS SHAPIRO, P.C.
     841 Mountain Avenue, First Floor
     Springfield, NJ 07081
     Tel: (973) 218-6877
     E-mail: middlebrooks@ middlebrooksshapiro.com

              About F & T Spirits Enterprises

Frank Helmka and Teresa Helmka sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 18-32272) on Nov. 9, 2018.  

Privately held wholesalers of wines and liquors F & T Spirits
Enterprises Inc.             and Wine Utopia, LLC, sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-32364 and 19-32365) on
Nov. 27, 2019.  The entities are owned by the Helmkas.

The cases are jointly administered under Case No. 18-32272.  Judge
Christine M. Gravelle is the presiding judge.

The Debtors tapped Melinda D. Middlebrooks, Esq., at Middlebrooks
Shapiro, P.C., as counsel.


FENCEPOST PRODUCTIONS: Hires McDowell Rice as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fencepost Productions, Inc. seeks approval from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas to employ Mcdowell Rice
Smith & Buchanan, PC, as its counsel.

Fencepost requires Mcdowell to:

     a. advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties in
the continued operation of its business and management of its
properties;

     b. attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of
creditors and other parties in interest on any and all matters
affecting the Debtor's business operations, claims by and against
the estate, and issues relating to the reorganization;

     c. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all motions, applications,
answers, responsive pleadings, complaints, any other necessary
filings, orders, reports, and documents needed for the
administration of the estate;

     d. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate including the prosecution of actions on its behalf,
the defense of any actions commenced against the Debtor or the
estate, negotiations concerning the litigation in which the Debtor
may be involved, and objections to claims filed against the
estate;

     e. attend all hearings and advocate the Debtor's positions on
the applicable issues;

     f. negotiate and prosecute on the Debtor's behalf use of cash
collateral, DIP financing, sales of assets, contracts and lease
agreements, and all necessary agreements and/or documents;

     g. formulate, negotiate and seeks approval of disclosure
statements and plans of reorganization;

     h. handle all appeals of the Debtor and appear before any
appellate courts to present the positions of the Debtor and the
estate before the courts;

     i. address all requirements of the Office of the United States
Trustee in this proceeding; and

     j. perform all other necessary legal services and provide all
other necessary legal advice to Debtor in connection with the
Chapter 11 case.

The hourly rates charged by the firm are:

     Shareholder     $210 - $550
     Associate       $175 - $190
     Paralegals       $75 - $150

Jonathan Margolies, Esq., at McDowell, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm has no connection with the Debtor or any of its
creditors.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jonathan A. Margolies, Esq.
     McDowell, Rice, Smith & Buchanan, PC
     605 W. 47th Street, Suite 350
     Kansas City, MO 64112
     Tel: 816-753-5400
     Fax: 816-753-9996
     Email: jmargolies@mcdowellrice.com

                       About Fencepost Productions, Inc.

Fencepost Productions, Inc. -- http://www.fencepostproductions.com
-- is a designer and distributor of men's, women's, and youth
outdoor apparel under its brands Staghorn River, Willow Trails, and
Northern Outpost.

Fencepost Productions, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 19-22623) on Dec. 18,
2019. In the petition signed by Matthew Gray, president, the Debtor
estimates $1 million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to
$50 million in liabilities. Jonathan A. Margolies, Esq. at Mcdowell
Rice Smith & Buchanan is the Debtor's counsel.


FOX SUBACUTE: Hires Isdaner & Company as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------
Fox Subacute At Mechanicsburg, LLC and its affiliates received
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Pennsylvania to employ Isdaner & Company, LLC as their accountant.

The services to be provided by the firm include the preparation of
tax returns and financial statements, and professional advice on
business matters.

Isdaner's hourly rates are:

     Partners      $460 - $600
     Manager       $280 - $455
     Senior Staff  $190 - $275
     Staff         $150 - $185

Scott Isdaner, managing member of Isdaner, attests that the firm
does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
bankruptcy estates.

The firm can be reached through:

     Scott Isdaner, CPA
     3 Bala Plaza
     Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
     Phone: +1 610-668-4200
     Email: sisdaner@isdanerllc.com

                     About Fox Subacute

Fox Subacute At Mechanicsburg, LLC is a skilled nursing facility in
Pennsylvania that specializes in pulmonary, neurological, and
rehabilitative care for patients with degenerative neurological and
neuromuscular disease; and pulmonary care and ventilator
requirements with an emphasis on vent weaning.  Its facilities are
located in Plymouth Meeting, Warrington, Mechanicsburg, and
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and are licensed by the PA Department of
Health.

On Nov. 1, 2019, Fox Subacute At Mechanicsburg and its affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Lead Case No.
19-04714).  Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.  Cunningham, Chernicoff & Warshawsky, P.C., led
by Robert E. Chernicoff, is the Debtors' legal counsel.  


FRESH ALTERNATIVES: Feb. 5, 2020 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa
Division, convened a hearing for consideration of the conditional
approval of the disclosure statement filed by the Debtor, Fresh
Alternatives, LLC.  On Dec. 17, 2019, Judge Michael G. Williamson
conditionally approving the disclosure statement and established
the following dates and deadlines:

    * Feb. 5, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. in Tampa, FL − Courtroom 8A,
Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Avenue is
the hearing on confirmation of the Plan, including timely filed
objections to confirmation, objections to the Disclosure Statement,
motions for cramdown, applications for compensation, and motions
for allowance of administrative claims.

    * Parties in interest shall submit to the Clerk's office their
written ballot accepting or rejecting the Plan no later than eight
days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

    * Objections to confirmation shall be filed with the Court and
served on the Local Rule 1007−2 Parties in Interest List no later
than seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

    * Three days prior to the Confirmation Hearing, the Plan
Proponent will file a confirmation affidavit which shall contain
the factual basis upon which the Plan Proponent relies in
establishing that each of the requirements of Section 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code are met.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at
https://tinyurl.com/sqac8ek from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                   About Fresh Alternatives

Fresh Alternatives -- https://www.crispers.com/ -- operates a
restaurant and provides catering services for various events.  It
conducts business under the name Crispers LLC.

Fresh Alternatives filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-05842) on June
20, 2019.  In the petition signed by Phil Birkhold, chief operating
officer, the Debtor disclosed $378,766 in total assets and
$5,349,790 in total liabilities. Bradley S. Shraiberg, Esq., at
Shraiberg, Landau & Page, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's bankruptcy case.


GAC VENTURES: Seeks to Hire Cohen & Krol as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
GAC Ventures, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Illinois to employ Cohen & Krol as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

Joseph Cohen, Esq., and Gina Krol, Esq., the attorneys who will be
handling the case, will each charge an hourly fee of $530.  

Both attorneys disclosed in a court filing that they do not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its bankruptcy
estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Joseph E. Cohen, Esq.
     Cohen & Krol
     105 West Madison Suite 1100
     Chicago, IL 60602
     Tel: 312 368-0300
     Email: jcohen@cohenandkrol.com  

                           About GAC Ventures LLC

Based in Tinley Park, Ill., GAC Ventures, LLC filed a voluntary
application for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (
Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-34020) on Dec. 2, 2019, listing under
$1 million in both assets and liabilities. Cohen & Krol is the
Debtor's legal counsel.  Judge Lashonda A. Hunt oversees the case.


GALVESTON BAY PROPERTIES: Okin Adams Approved as Co-Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Galveston Bay Properties, LLC and Galveston Bay Operating Company,
LLC sought and obtained authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ Okin Adams LLP
as co-counsel for the Debtors.

On November 18, 2019, the Debtors filed their Application to employ
Kell C. Mercer & Kell C. Mercer, P.C. as co-bankruptcy counsel and
request for emergency status conference.  The Court entered its
Order approving the Mercer Application on November 21, 2019.

The Debtors require Okin Adams LLP to serve as bankruptcy
co-counsel with Kell C. Mercer, P.C. in these bankruptcy cases. The
Debtors have selected Okin Adams LLP because the firm possesses
extensive knowledge and expertise in the areas of law relevant to
this case and is well qualified to represent the Debtors in this
proceeding.

Okin Adams will render these services:

a)  Advise the Debtors with respect to their rights, duties and
powers in this case;

b)  Assist and advise the Debtors in their consultations relative
to the administration of the Bankruptcy Cases;

c)  Assist the Debtors in analyzing the claims of the creditors and
in negotiating with such creditors;

d)  Assist the Debtors in the analysis of, and negotiations with,
any third-party concerning matters relating to, among other things,
the terms of a plan of reorganization;

e)  Represent the Debtors at all hearings and other proceedings;

f)  Review and analyze all applications, orders, statements of
operations and schedules filed with the Court and advise the
Debtors as to their propriety;

g)  Assist the Debtors in preparing pleadings and applications as
may be necessary in furtherance of the Debtors' interests and
objectives; and

h)  Perform such other legal services as may be required and are
deemed to be in the interests of the Debtors in accordance with the
Debtors' powers and duties as set forth in the Bankruptcy Code.

Okin Adams received an initial retainer from the Debtors of $40,000
on October 23, 2019. Immediately prior to filing the Bankruptcy
Cases, Okin Adams applied the Retainer to pay all fees and expenses
then incurred by the Debtor. In total, Okin Adams was paid $6,150
in fees and expenses prior to the Petition Date. As of the filing
of the Debtors' Bankruptcy Cases, Okin Adams was not owed any fees
and expenses by the Debtor, and $33,850 of the Retainer remained in
the client trust account.

Okin Adams charges these hourly rates for its services:

     Christopher Adams at $500.00 per hour
     Ryan A. O'Connor at $275.00 per hour
     Paralegals and other support staff at $135.00 per hour.

Okin Adams attests that the firm is a disinterested person as that
term is defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.  Okin
Adams is not, and was not a director, officer, or employee of the
Debtors.  Okin Adams does not have an interest materially adverse
to the interests of the estate or of any class of creditors or
equity security holders.

The firm may be reached at:

     Christopher Adams, Esq.
     Ryan A. O’Connor, Esq.
     OKIN ADAMS LLP
     1113 Vine St., Suite 240
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: 713-228-4100
     Fax: 888-865-2118
     Email: cadams@okinadams.com
            roconnor@okinadams.com

                  About Galveston Bay Properties
     
Galveston Bay Properties is a privately held company that operates
in the oil and gas extraction business.  Its principal assets
include oil and gas leases in Chambers and Galveston Counties,
Texas.  

Galveston Bay Properties, LLC, and affiliate Galveston Bay
Operating Company LLC sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 19-36075) on Nov. 1, 2019 in Houston, Texas.  As
of the Petition Date, each of the Debtors was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  Judge Eduardo V.
Rodriguez is the presiding judge.  KELL C. MERCER, P.C., and OKIN
ADAMS, LLC serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.



GENERATION NEXT: Seeks to Hire Signature Analytics as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------------
Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc. and its debtor-affiliates
seek approval from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada to hire Signature Analytics, LLC as their
accountant.

Signature will provide certain providers that will provide the
Services for the Debtors. In addition, Signature will
report and pay any income tax withholdings, disability,
unemployment, worker's compensation, employee benefits, and similar
items for any of the Service Providers that are utilized by the
Debtors.

Signature's hourly rates are:

     Vice President                      $265 – $350
     CFO                                 $265 – $350
     Financial Services Process Manager  $190 – $225
     Controller                          $185 – $225
     Accounting Manager                  $145 – $225
     Senior Accountant                   $115 – $135
     Staff Accountant                    $85 – $95
     Bookkeeper/Junior Staff Accountant  $65 – $75

The Debtors will pay an initial deposit of $16,000.00 to Signature.
For each month thereafter, the Debtors will incur a minimum monthly
fee of $6,750 and a monthly Technology Platform Cost of $150.

Signature is a "disinterested person" pursuant to sections 327(a)
and 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jason Kruger
     Signature Analytics LLC.
     10120 Pacific Heights, Suite #110
     San Diego, CA 92121
     Phone: (855) 934-0689

                    About Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc.

Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc. is a holding company that
owns three operating subsidiaries: Reis & Irvy's, Inc., Print
Mates, Inc., and 19 Degrees, Inc.  The Debtors primarily develop
and operate unattended retail platforms and related technology
through franchise, licensing, wholesale, and corporate owned
business models.

Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc. and its debtor-affiliates
concurrently filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 19-17921) on
Dec. 15, 2019. The petitions were signed by Ryan Polk, chief
executive officer. As of Sep. 24, 2019, Generation Next estimated
$15,800,000 in assets and $45,000,000 in liabilities.

Matthew C. Zirzow, Esq. at LARZON ZIRZOW KAPLAN & COTTNER
represents the Debtor as counsel.


GENERATION NEXT: Seeks Up to $2.535M of DIP Loan, Gets Interim OK
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc., and debtor affiliates asked
permission from the Bankruptcy Court to obtain up to $2,535,000 in
aggregate principal amount of DIP credit facility from Genext Loan
LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company.  

The DIP lender has agreed to make advances to the Debtors up to the
availability amount as follows: (i) upon entry of the Interim Order
an initial advance by the Lender not to exceed $500,000 and (ii)
thereafter, additional advances in the aggregate amount up to the
maximum loan amount in accordance with the budget.

The DIP loan bears an interest at 20% per annum, and 28% per annum
immediately upon the occurrence of an event of default (the default
rate).  The lender is to receive a loan fee of $60,000, which is
fully earned as of the entry of the final order.

The DIP obligation will mature on the earliest of:
   (a) (i) the occurrence of an Event of Default and (ii) the
Effective Date of a Plan of Reorganization.  The borrowers may
extend such date by up to two periods of 60 days each, so long as
no event of default has occurred, subject to the lender’s written
consent, or an event of default has occurred and such event of
default has been waived by the Lender;

   (b) the date of the acceleration of any outstanding credit
extensions;

   (c) entry of an order reversing in any respect either of the
financing orders (unless waived in writing by the lender);

   (d) the conversion of any of the Chapter 11 Cases to a case
under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code;

   (e) the appointment of a trustee or an examiner with special
powers;

   (f) the dismissal of any of the Chapter 11 cases; and

   (g) 120 days following the effective date, unless extended in
writing by lender.

The terms of the DIP agreement also included these provisions:

(1) Administrative Priority, Lien Priority

The DIP obligations will constitute allowed administrative expenses
in the Chapter 11 cases, having priority in payment over all other
administrative expenses and unsecured claims against the borrowers
now existing or hereafter arising, of any kind or nature
whatsoever, including all administrative expenses of the kind
specified in, or arising or ordered under, the Bankruptcy Code,
except as to the carve-Out.

Pursuant to Section 364(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, the proposed
interim and final orders, all obligations will be secured by a
perfected priming first priority Lien on the collateral, except as
to the carve-out.  The senior pre-petition obligations will be
secured by a replacement lien on all post-petition assets (but
excluding avoidance actions), to the extent of any diminution of
value of any pre-petition collateral and the use of cash
collateral, junior only to the liens of the lender with respect to
the obligations and the carve-out.  The pre-petition lenders retain
the right to seek super priority claims for any diminution in the
value of each pre-petition lender's pre-petition collateral.

  (2) Asset Sale and Unconditional Right to Credit Bid

If, pursuant to a sale order, the lender, or its designee, is the
winning bidder, either the assets of the borrowers will be sold to
the lender pursuant to a sale under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy
Code, (which sale may or may not be a component of the borrowers'
plan of reorganization, for the consideration set forth in the
winning bid or a transaction having substantially the same effect
will be consummated as a restructuring of the borrowers pursuant to
a plan of reorganization).

If a plan of reorganization for the borrowers is not confirmed by
any confirmation deadline or an event of default occurs under the
loan documents, then (if the lender so elects) the assets of the
borrowers will be sold to the highest and best offer pursuant to a
sale order as a 363 Sale outside of a plan of reorganization for
the consideration set forth in the winning bid.

Any 363 sale, similar transaction or a plan of reorganization
having the same effect, will permit the lender to credit bid the
full amount of any of its claims and debts.  The lender will be a
qualified bidder under any auction or sale procedures and may
participate at any auction, sale or other restructuring
transaction.

  (3) Carve-out

The liens and claims (including the DIP superpriority claims)
granted to the DIP lender through the interim order, the DIP loan
documents, and/or the pre-petition loan documents will be subject
to the payment of these fees and claim:
     (a) fees owed to the Office of the United States Trustee;

     (b) fees payable to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court;

     (c) the fees and expenses of professionals of the borrowers or
any Committee retained under Sections 327, 328, or 1103 of the
Bankruptcy Code that are incurred or accrued on or prior to the
maturity date, to the extent:
        (i) $150,000 for Larson Zirzow Kaplan & Cottner, $100,000
for McDonald Hopkins, and $50,000 for any official committee; and
       (ii) that such amounts are later approved by the Bankruptcy
Court pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code;

    (d) the fees and expenses of all retained professionals that
are incurred or accrued subsequent to the maturity date in a total
amount not to exceed $30,000 to the extent that such amounts are
later approved by the Bankruptcy Court.

  (4) Milestones

Unless waived in writing by the DIP Lender, it is an event of
default for the Debtors to fail to comply with any of these
milestones:

     (a) the borrowers' shall file its motion to approve bidding
and sale procedures (including break-up fee, qualified bidder
requirements, bid, sale hearing, auction and closing deadlines, and
bidding rules, all in the form acceptable to Lender, no later than
21 days after the Petition Date.

     (b) the borrowers shall obtain approval of the Bid Procedures
Motion no later than 55 days after the Petition Date.

     (c) the borrowers shall conduct an auction no later than 90
days after the Petition Date.

     (d) the borrowers shall obtain final approval of any 363 sale
transaction no later than 100 days after the Petition Date.

A copy of the DIP motion is available for free at
https://is.gd/HhdCiX from PacerMonitor.com.

                      Interim Order Granted

Judge Mike K. Nakagawa authorized the Debtors to borrow under the
DIP loan documents up to the initial advance amount of $500,000.
The Debtors are also authorized to execute, deliver and perform
under all the terms of the DIP loan documents.  

A copy of the interim order is available at https://is.gd/vXkbGM
from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Final hearing is scheduled on January 16, 2020.  Deadline for
filing objections is on January 13, 2020.  Replies must be received
no later than 5 p.m. on January 15, 2020.

             About Generation Next Franchise Brands

Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc. is a holding company that
owns three operating subsidiaries: Reis & Irvy's, Inc., Print
Mates, Inc., and 19 Degrees, Inc.  The companies primarily develop
and operate unattended retail platforms and related technology
through franchise, licensing, wholesale, and corporate owned
business models.

Generation Next Franchise Brands and its affiliates filed voluntary
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 19-17921) on
Dec. 15, 2019. The petitions were signed by Ryan Polk, chief
executive officer.  As of Sep. 24, 2019, Generation Next estimated
$15,800,000 in assets and $45,000,000 in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Larson Zirzow Kaplan & Cottner as general
bankruptcy counsel; McDonald Hopkins LLC as co-counsel with Larson
Zirzow; and Sutter Securities, Inc. as investment banker.






GENERATION NEXT: U.S. Trustee Objects to DIP Motion
---------------------------------------------------
In an omnibus objection filed with the Bankruptcy Court, the U.S.
Trustee for Region 17, Tracy Hope Davis, complained, among others,
that the proposed DIP financing has a number of provisions that
should not be approved on abbreviated notice, if at all.  

According to the U.S. Trustee, the Debtors have not demonstrated
the need to borrow $500,000 on an interim basis, pointing out that
the Debtors failed to provide a budget.  "Thus it is unclear if the
Debtors need to borrow the full interim and final loan amounts",
the U.S. Trustee said.

The U.S. Trustee also complained that the interest rate and fees
under the DIP financing may not be the product of the reasonable
exercise of the debtors' business judgment.   "The proposed
interest rate raises particular concerns if the loan proceeds are
used to pay off the existing secured loans with lower interest
rates than the 20% contemplated by the DIP Loan.  Thus, at this
very early stage of the cases, there is simply not enough
information to know if this term of the proposed financing
arrangement is reasonable", the U.S. Trustee added.  

A copy of the omnibus objection is available at
https://is.gd/9S44Bi from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

             About Generation Next Franchise Brands

Generation Next Franchise Brands, Inc. is a holding company that
owns three operating subsidiaries: Reis & Irvy's, Inc., Print
Mates, Inc., and 19 Degrees, Inc.  The companies primarily develop
and operate unattended retail platforms and related technology
through franchise, licensing, wholesale, and corporate owned
business models.

Generation Next Franchise Brands and its affiliates filed voluntary
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No. 19-17921) on
Dec. 15, 2019. The petitions were signed by Ryan Polk, chief
executive officer.  As of Sep. 24, 2019, Generation Next estimated
$15,800,000 in assets and $45,000,000 in liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Larson Zirzow Kaplan & Cottner as general
bankruptcy counsel; McDonald Hopkins LLC as co-counsel with Larson
Zirzow; and Sutter Securities, Inc. as investment banker.


GRABAH PRETZEL: Court Confirms Plan of Reorganization
-----------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 2, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. conducted a hearing to consider
confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization and approval of the
Disclosure Statement filed by debtor Grabah Pretzel Inc.  On Dec.
17, 2019, Judge Caryl E. Delano ordered that:

   * The Plan is confirmed pursuant to Sections 1129(a) and 1129(b)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

   * The Debtor's Disclosure Statement is adequate and approved.

Under the Plan, Class 1 represents the secured claim of Hyundai
Motor Finance secured to a 2017 Hyundai Elantra.  The Motion
pursuant to Section 1129(b) (Doc. No. 45) is granted as to Class 1.
Hyundai Motor Finance will retain its liens and the Debtor will
pay $8500.00 with interest accruing at the contract rate of 2.97%
per annum over a three-year term, and commence thirty days from the
Effective Date of the Plan. Monthly payments will be $246.40.

Class 2 represents general unsecured claims.  The Debtor proposes
to pay allowed Class 2 unsecured claims in full by 20 equal
quarterly installments with the initial payment commencing on the
90th day after the Effective Date of the Plan.

Class 3 represents equity interest of the Debtor.  Existing equity
will be cancelled and the equity in the reorganized debtor shall be
placed in the current owner in exchange for $2,000 in readily
available funds to the Debtor’s DIP account on or before the
effective date of the Plan.

A status conference is scheduled in this matter to be held on Jan.
13, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 9A, Sam M. Gibbons U.S.
Courthouse, 801 N. Florida Ave., Tampa, FL 33602.

A full-text copy of the Order Confirming the Plan is available at
https://tinyurl.com/txtumbt from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                      About Grabah Pretzel

Grabah Pretzel Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-04329) on May 7, 2019, estimating under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  McIntyre Thanasides
Bringgold Elliott Grimaldi Guito & Matthews, P.A., led by James W.
Elliott, Esq., is the Debtor's counsel.


GRANITE VALLEY GRANDE: Crow & Dunlevy Tapped as Bankr. Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Granite Valley Grande, LLC, seeks permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ Crowe
& Dunlevy, P.C. as the Debtor's counsel effective nunc pro tunc to
the Petition Date.

The Debtor is a Texas limited liability company formed in 2015 for
the purpose of owning real estate that would be leased to a
third-party to operate a senior care facility. The real estate
Debtor owns is located at 901 Wildrose Lane, Brownsville, Texas
78520.

The Debtor leased the Property to Senior Care Centers, LLC and its
affiliate(s) on June 30, 2015 to operate and manage a senior care
facility at the Property, with a term of the lease for 15 years.
Valley Grande Manor, which has 180 licensed skilled nursing beds,
is the name of the senior care facility that SCC operates at the
Property.

SCC failed to perform under the Lease, failing to make certain
rental payments due and owing to the Debtor. SCC has not
surrendered possession of the Property. In addition, SCC has not
turned over any of the proceeds they have received from operating
the Facility under the lease for the post-December 4, 2018 period.
The Debtor is unable to lease the facility to a different operator
and is not receiving rental payments from SCC while it remains in
possession of the Property due to SCC's Chapter 11 case.

The Debtor requests that Crowe & Dunlevy will perform these legal
services:

     a) Provide legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers
and duties as debtor-in-possession in the operation of its business
and the management of estate property;

     b) Take all necessary steps to protect and preserve the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate;

     c) Serve as counsel of record for the Debtor in all aspects of
this Chapter 11 Case, including, without limitation, the
prosecution of actions on behalf of the Debtor, the defense of any
actions commenced against the Debtor, and objections to claims
filed against the Debtor's estate;

     d) Prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary motions,
orders, reports, and other legal papers in connection with the
administration of the Debtor's estate;

     e) Advise the Debtor with respect to corporate and litigation
matters;

     f) Consult with the Office of the United States Trustee for
the Northern District of Texas, any official committee of unsecured
creditors appointed in this Chapter 11 Case, and all other
creditors and parties-in-interest concerning the administration of
this Chapter 11 Case; and

     g) Provide representation and all other bankruptcy-related
legal services required by the Debtor in discharging its duties as
debtor-in-possession or otherwise in connection with this Chapter
11 Case.

Crowe & Dunlevy will charge the Debtor for its legal services on an
hourly basis:

  Vickie Driver at $575.00 per hour
  Christina Stephenson at $525.00 per hour
  Christopher M. Staine at $380.00 per hour
  Seth Sloan at $250.00 per hour
  Legal assistants at $150.00 to $200.00 per hour.

The Debtor paid Crowe & Dunlevy $93,343.00 as a retainer. Prior to
the Petition Date, Crowe & Dunlevy drew down $7,500.00 to pay for
pre-petition services and expenses.

Crowe & Dunlevy attests that it neither holds nor represents any
interest adverse to the Debtor's estate and is a disinterested
person within the meaning of section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm may be reached at:

  Vickie L. Driver, Esq.
  Christina W. Stephenson, Esq.
  Christopher M. Staine, Esq.
  Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C.
  McKinnon St., Suite 425
  Dallas, TX 75201
  Tel: (214) 420.2163
  Fax: (214) 736.1762
  Email: vickie.driver@crowe.dunlevy.com
         christina.stephenson@crowedunlevy.com
         christopher.staine@crowedunlevy.com

               About Granite Valley Grande

Granite Valley Grande, LLC, is a Texas limited liability company
formed in 2015 for the purpose of owning real estate that would be
leased to a third-party to operate a senior care facility.  It owns
is located at 901 Wildrose Lane, Brownsville, Texas 78520.

Granite Valley Grande, LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-33747) on November 5,
2019.  It is a Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale oversees
the case.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Allen L.
Boerner, principal and founder of Granite Investment Group, manager
of Granite Valley Grande, LLC.

The Debtor is represented by Vickie L. Driver, Esq., Christina W.
Stephenson, Esq. and Christopher M. Staine, Esq., at Crowe &
Dunlevy, P.C.



GULLIVER'S GATE: Gabriel Del Virginia Tapped as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Gulliver's Gate, LLC, sought and obtained permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to employ
the Law Offices of Gabriel Del Virginia as its Chapter 11 counsel.

The Del Virginia Firm will render these professional services:

(a)  Provide the Debtor legal advice regarding its authorities and
duties as a debtor-in-possession in the continued operation of its
business and the management of its property and affairs;

(b)  Prepare all necessary pleadings, orders, and related legal
documents and assist the Debtor and its accounting professionals in
preparing monthly reports to the Office of the United States
Trustee; and

(c)  Perform any additional legal services to the Debtor which may
be necessary and appropriate in the conduct of this case.

The Del Virginia Firm's billing rates are: Gabriel Del Virginia,
Partner $500.00 per hour; Associate $325.00.00 per hour; and,
Paralegal $135.00 per hour.

To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, the Del Virginia Firm has no
connection with the Debtor, its creditors, or any other party in
interest, or their respective attorneys or agents.

The Del Virginia Firm represents no interest adverse to the Debtor
as a debtor-in-possession or to its estate and their employment
would be in the best interest of the Debtor, its estate and its
general creditor body.

The firm may be reached at:

     Gabriel Del Virginia, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF GABRIEL DEL VIRGINIA
     30 Wall Street, 12th Floor
     New York, NY 10005
     Tel: (212) 371-5478
     Fax: (212) 371-0460
     Email: gabriel.delvirginia@verizon.net

                   About Gulliver's Gate

Gulliver's Gate, LLC, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-13392) on October 24, 2019, and is represented
by Gabriel Del Virginia, Esq., at the Law Offices of Gabriel del
Virginia.  The Debtor listed under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities.

The case has been reassigned from Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil to Judge
Robert E. Grossman.



HUDDLESTON VENTURES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Huddleston Ventures, LLC
        13654 Lakeside Place Drive
        Willis, TX 77318

Business Description: Huddleston Ventures, LLC is a Single Asset
                      Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                      Section 101(51B)).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 6, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas

Case No.: 20-30086

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey P. Norman

Debtor's Counsel: Margaret M. McClure, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF MARGARET M. MCCLURE
                  909 Fannin, Suite 3810
                  Houston, TX 77010
                  Tel: 713-659-1333
                  Email: margaret@mmmcclurelaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Jack Huddleston, managing member.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                       https://is.gd/KnhxWy


HUDSON TECHNOLOGIES: Appoints Chief Restructuring Officer
---------------------------------------------------------
Hudson Technologies, Inc., appointed Ryan A. Maupin as its chief
restructuring officer on Jan. 2, 2020.

Mr. Maupin, age 39, is a principal of Grant Thornton LLP in its
Strategic Solutions practice, a position he has held since 2015.
Prior to becoming a Principal, from 2013-2015, Mr. Maupin was a
Director in the Strategic Solutions practice of Grant Thornton LLP.
Mr. Maupin specializes in advising boards of directors, senior
executives, creditors and funds in restructuring situations.  From
2010 to 2013, Mr. Maupin was a Director in the Transactions and
Restructuring Group at KPMG LLP.  From 2006 to 2010 he was a
manager at Grant Thornton LLP and from 2005 to 2006 served as a
Consultant at Navigant Capital Advisors.

Mr. Maupin's services are being provided to the Company by Grant
Thornton LLP at a cost of $120,000 per month.

Mr. Maupin was retained by the Company in accordance with the
requirements set forth in the Waiver and Fourth Amendment to Term
Loan Credit and Security Agreement among Hudson Technologies
Company, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, and HTC's
affiliates Hudson Holdings, Inc. and Aspen Refrigerants, Inc., as
borrowers, the Company as a guarantor, and U.S. Bank National
Association, as collateral agent and administrative agent, and the
various lenders thereunder.

In the event that, following the retention of the chief
restructuring officer, LTM Adjusted EBITDA (as defined) exceeds the
greater of (x) 105% of the minimum LTM Adjusted EBITDA and (y)
$9.55 million for two consecutive quarterly reporting periods, the
Company may terminate the CRO if the Company reasonably determines
that the services of the CRO are no longer needed; provided, that
no default shall have occurred or be continuing under the Term Loan
Facility.

                        About Hudson Technologies

Hudson Technologies, Inc. -- http://www.hudsontech.com/-- is a
provider of innovative and sustainable solutions for optimizing
performance and enhancing reliability of commercial and industrial
chiller plants and refrigeration systems.  Hudson's proprietary
RefrigerantSide Services increase operating efficiency, provide
energy and cost savings, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the
plant's carbon footprint while enhancing system life and
reliability of operations at the same time. RefrigerantSide
Services can be performed at a customer's site as an integral part
of an effective scheduled maintenance program or in response to
emergencies.  Hudson also offers SMARTenergy OPS, which is a
cloud-based Managed Software as a Service for continuous
monitoring, Fault Detection and Diagnostics and real-time
optimization of chilled water plants.  In addition, the Company
sells refrigerants and provides traditional reclamation services
for commercial and industrial air conditioning and refrigeration
uses.

Hudson Technologies reported a net loss of $55.66 million in 2018.
As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had $204.21 million in total
assets, $149.25 million in total liabilities, and $54.95 million in
total stockholders' equity.

As disclosed in the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept.
30, 2019, "The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is
contingent upon its ability to comply with the financial covenants
within its credit agreements.  The Company's level of indebtedness
has adversely impacted, and continues to adversely impact, the
Company's financial condition, including operating results and
liquidity position.  As of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019,
the Company was not in compliance with the financial covenants in
the Term Loan Facility and the PNC Facility, thus raising
substantial doubt as to the ability to continue as a going concern
within one year after the date the financial statements were
issued.  The Company has satisfied all of its debt payment
obligations on a timely basis and had over $14 million of cash on
hand and $23 million of availability pursuant to the borrowing base
formula in the PNC Facility as of September 30, 2019; and is
working with its lenders to obtain a waiver and amendment of its
credit facilities.  However, there can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to conclude any such waivers or amendments on
acceptable terms or at all."


ION GEOPHYSICAL: CFO Steve Bate Will Retire Next Month
------------------------------------------------------
Steve Bate, ION Geophysical Corporation's executive vice president
and chief financial officer, will be retiring and stepping down
from his position as CFO effective Feb. 1, 2020. Mr. Bate, who
joined ION in 2005, will remain with ION as a strategic advisor to
the CEO until the end of June to facilitate a seamless transition.

"On behalf of ION and our Board of Directors, I would like to thank
Steve for his many contributions over the last 15 years," said
Chris Usher, ION's president and chief executive officer. "He has
held a number of financial and operational leadership positions at
ION and was instrumental in helping us navigate multiple
challenging E&P cycles."

Mr. Bate will be succeeded by Mike Morrison as the Company's
executive vice president and chief financial officer (interim). In
his 17-year tenure with ION, Mr. Morrison has exceled in a variety
of senior positions in finance and accounting, mostly recently as
vice president of finance and treasurer.

"Mike has in-depth knowledge and extensive experience to
effectively steward ION's financial management," said Chris Usher,
ION's president and chief executive officer.  "He has worked
closely with our executive team on a number of strategic financial
initiatives, including multiple capital market transactions, and
I'm looking forward to working with him to deliver value to all of
our stakeholders."

In connection with Mr. Bate's transition and retirement, the
Company and Mr. Bate entered into a Transition, Separation and
Release Agreement dated as of Jan. 3, 2020.  The Separation
Agreement, which contains a general release of claims in favor of
the Company and provides that Mr. Bate will receive, among other
things, in each case subject to applicable withholdings (i) a
severance payment equal to $750,000, payable in substantially equal
installments in accordance with the Company's normal payroll
practices commencing on Jan. 17, 2021, provided that an initial
payment of $187,500 shall be payable on Jan. 3, 2021, (ii) a
one-time payment of $281,250 representing the pro-rata share of Mr.
Bate's 2019 target annual bonus payment payable no later than Feb.
29, 2020, and (iii) continuing medical and dental coverage for Mr.
Bate and his spouse, and continuing life insurance coverage for Mr.
Bate, for a 24-month period.

                           About ION

Headquartered in Houston, Texas, ION Geophysical Corporation --
iongeo.com -- develops and leverages innovative technologies,
creating value through data capture, analysis and optimization to
enhance critical decision-making, enabling superior returns.  While
the traditional focus of its cutting-edge technology has been on
the exploration and production industry, the Company is now
broadening and diversifying its business into relevant adjacent
markets such as offshore logistics, military and marine robotics.

ION reported a net loss attributable to the company of $71.17
million in 2018, a net loss attributable to the company of $30.24
million in 2017, and a net loss attributable to the company of
$65.15 million in 2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had
$254.99 million in total assets, $278.09 million in total
liabilities, and a total deficit of $23.11 million.

                           *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Feb. 15, 2019, S&P Global Ratings
affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on ION and revised the
outlook to stable from negative.  The 'CCC+' issuer credit rating
reflects the company's exposure to the E&P industry's volatile
capital spending; reliance on licensing rounds, which could be
further delayed; and a debt maturity in December 2021.


JM GRAIN: Unsecureds Owed $8.9M to Recover $100K in Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor JM Grain, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of North Dakota an Amended Disclosure Statement describing
its Plan of Reorganization.

Class 7 shall consist of convenience class unsecured claims, i.e.
unsecured allowed claims not entitled to priority where each calim
does not exceed $5,000.  Any unsecured creditor whose claim exceeds
$5,000 may elect by voting on the Plan to be treated as a Class 7
Convenience Class creditor by electing to reduce their Claim to
$5,000.00. The holders of Class 7 Allowed Claims will be paid a
total of 50% of their Allowed Claims on the Effective Date.  The
Debtor estimates there are approximately $34,000 in Allowed Claims
in Class 7.

Class 8 shall consist of all other unsecured allowed claims against
the Debtor not entitled to priority, the undersecured portions of
Claims provided for in Classes 2, 5, and 6 and any other unsecured
Claims.  Class 8 will be paid in 10 semi-annual installments of
$10,000 beginning on Aug. 15, 2020, and continuing thereafter on
February 15th and August 15th for a period of 5 years.  All
semi-annual installments to Class 8 shall be distributed pro rata
among the members of Class 8.  Such payments shall be in full
satisfaction of each Class 8 Allowed Claim.  The Debtor estimates
there are approximately $8,861,652 in Allowed Claims in Class 8.

Justin Flaten and Marvin Flaten each hold 50% of the Debtor's
shares. On or before the Effective Date, the Interest holders will
contribute cash funds to the Debtor of $250,000 in new value.
Justin Flaten has agreed to continue to serve as President of the
Debtor and receive a fixed, reduced salary of $115,000 annually,
for five years, in exchange for retaining his ownership interest in
the Debtor. Marvin Flaten has agreed to continue to serve as Vice
President of the Debtor and receive a fixed, reduced salary of
$50,000 for five years, in exchange for retaining his ownership
interest in the Debtor. These salaries are below market rate for
managers in this field with the experience of Justin Flaten and
Marvin Flaten. This reduction in salary is valued at $400,000 over
five years.

Payments and distributions made under the Plan for Classes 1-8 will
be funded by the Debtor’s income from business operations. The
infusion of $250,000 in new value by the shareholders on or before
the Effective Date of the Plan. Arrow Kay Farms, Inc. (owned by
Justin and Melissa Flaten) is the fee owner of 840 acres of real
property located in Chouteau County.

In support of the Plan, the Debtor proposes to transfer the Arrow
Kay Property to the Debtor and Debtor would thus be able to utilize
the Arrow Kay Property by selling it to pay off the two contracts
for deed and pay down the debt owing to First Western Bank & Trust.
Pending a sale of the Arrow Kay Property, the Debtor may utilize
the Arrow Kay Property to grow specialty crops which would decrease
the cost of goods sold in Debtor’s operations.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at https://tinyurl.com/sgnkag5 from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

        VOGEL LAW FIRM
        Caren W. Stanley
        Jon R. Brakke
        218 NP Avenue
        PO Box 1389
        Fargo, ND 58107-1389
        Telephone: 701.237.6983
        E-mail: cstanley@vogellaw.com
                jbrakke@vogellaw.com

                         About JM Grain

JM Grain Inc. buys and sells pulse crops. JM Grain sources its
pulses from over 700 independent farmer-producers growing crops in
the fertile fields of Montana and North Dakota. On the
web:https://www.jmgrain.com/

JM Grain, Inc., based in Garrison, ND, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D.N.D. Case No. 19-30359) on June 25, 2019. In the petition
signed by Justin E. Flaten, president, the Debtor estimated up to
$50,000 to $100,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities. The Hon. Shon Hastings oversees the case. Caren
Stanley, partner of Vogel Law Firm, serves as bankruptcy counsel to
the Debtor.


JUNO USA: Seeks to Hire Chipman Brown as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Juno USA LP seek authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to employ Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, LLP, as
counsel to the Debtor.

Juno USA requires Chipman Brown to:

   a. provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' powers
      and duties as debtors-in-possession in the continued
      operation of their businesses and management of their
      properties;

   b. negotiate, draft, and pursue all documentation necessary in
      these Chapter 11 Cases;

   c. prepare on behalf of the Debtors all applications, motions,
      answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers necessary
      to the administration of the Debtors' estates;

   d. appear in Court and protecting the interests of the Debtors
      before the Court;

   e. assist with any disposition of the Debtors' assets, by sale
      or otherwise;

   f. negotiate and taking all necessary or appropriate actions
      in connection with a plan or plans of reorganization and
      all related documents thereunder and transactions
      contemplated therein;

   g. attend all meetings and negotiating with representatives of
      creditors, the United States Trustee, and other parties-in-
      interest;

   h. provide legal advice regarding bankruptcy law, corporate
      law, corporate governance, transactional, litigation and
      other issues to the Debtors in connection with the Debtors'
      ongoing business operations; and

   i. perform all other legal services for, and providing all
      other necessary legal advice to, the Debtors, which may be
      necessary and proper in these Chapter 11 Cases.

Chipman Brown will be paid at these hourly rates:

     William E. Chipman, Jr.          $595
     Mark Desgrosseilliers            $595
     Mark D. Olivere                  $475
     Michelle M. Dero                 $225

Chipman Brown will be paid a retainer in the amount of $100,000,
and Supplemental Retainer in the amount $50,000.

Chipman Brown will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

William E. Chipman, a partner at Chipman Brown, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Chipman Brown can be reached at:

     William E. Chipman, Esq.
     Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, LLP
     1313 North Market Street, Suite 5400
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302) 295-0191
     Fax: (302) 295-0199

                        About Juno USA

Juno USA, LP also known as Juno Lab, L.P., was a ride-hailing,
mobile application-based transportation network company that
operated in New York, New York, where its headquarters are located.
Juno launched its mobile application and began offering its
services in early 2016. Prior to the Chapter 11 filing, Juno shut
down its US operations. The company's website is
https://gojuno.com

Juno and five debtor affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-12484) on Nov. 19, 2019. In the
petition signed by CRO Melissa S. Kibler, the Debtors were each
estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets, and $100
million to $500 million in liabilities.

The case has been assigned to Judge Mary F. Walrath.

The Debtors tapped Chipman Brown Cicero & Cole, LLP as
bankruptcycounsel; Mackinac Partners, LLC as financial advisor; and
Omni Agent Solutions as notice, claims and balloting agent.



K3D PROPERTY: Seeks to Hire Farinash & Stofan as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
K3D Property Services, LLC, seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to employ
Jerrold D. Farinash, Esq., and Farinash & Stofan as its counsel.

Legal services Farinash will render are:

     a. assist Debtor in the preparation of its schedules,
statement of affairs and the periodic financial reports required by
the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules and any other order of
this Court;

     b. assist Debtor in consultation and negotiation and all other
dealings with creditors, equity, security holders and other parties
in interest concerning the administration of this case;

     c. prepare pleadings, conducting investigations and making
court appearances incidental to the administration of the Debtor's
estate;

     d. advise the Debtor of its rights, duties and obligations
under the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules, Local Rules and orders
of this Court;

     e. assist the Debtor in the development and formulation of a
plan of reorganization including the preparation of a plan,
disclosure statement and any other related documents for submission
to this Court and to Debtor's creditors, equity holders and other
parties in interest;

     f. advise and assist the Debtor with respect to litigation
related to the administration of Debtor's case;

     g. render corporate and other legal advise and perform all
those legal services necessary and proper to the functioning of the
Debtor during the pendency of this case; and

     h. take any and all necessary actions in the interest of the
Debtor and its estate incident to the proper representation of the
Debtor and the administration of this case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Jerrold D. Farinash   $400
     Amanda Stofan         $300
     Legal Assistants      $100

Farinash & Stofan received a retainer in the sum of $10,000.

The firm does not hold any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estate, according to court filings.

Farinash & Stofan can be reached through:

     Jerrold D. Farinash, Esq.
     Farinash & Stofan
     100 West M L King Blvd., Suite 816
     Chattanooga, TN 37402
     Email: jdf@8053100.com

                  About K3D Property Services, LLC

K3D Property Services, LLC offers a variety of services, including
home remodeling, basement finishing, drywall installation and
finishing, tile installation, carpet installation, wall framing,
bathroom remodeling, kitchen remodeling, deck installation and
maintenance, interior and exterior painting, commercial painting,
wallpaper and popcorn ceiling removal, deck staining, concrete
floor coatings, and metal roof painting.

K3D Property Services, LLC, filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No.
19-15361) on Dec. 23, 2019. The petition was signed by Kenneth
Morris, managing member. At the time
of the filing, the Debtor had estimated $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities. The case is assigned to Judge
Shelley D. Rucker.  Amanda Stofan, Esq. at FARINASH & STOFAN and
Steven R. Fox, Esq. at THE FOX LAW CORPORATION, INC. are the
Debtor's legal counsels.


LAJ CONSTRUCTION: Mark J. Hannon Approved as Bankruptcy Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------------
LAJ Construction, Inc., sought and obtained permission from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California to
employ Mark J. Hannon, Esq. as its bankruptcy attorney.

The Debtor needs the firm to:

     (a) Prepare and file Schedules, Statement of Financial Affairs
and other related forms;

     (b) Represent the Debtor-In-Possession in possession at all
future meetings of creditors, hearings, pretrial conferences, and
trial in this case of any litigation arising in connection with the
case;

     (c) Prepare, file and present to the court any pleading
requesting or opposing relief;

     (d) Prepare, file and present to the court a disclosure
statement and plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code;

     (e) Review claims made by creditors and interested parties,
including preparation and prosecution of any objections to claims
as appropriate;

     (f) Prepare and present a final accounting and motion for
final decree closing this case;

     (g) Prepare, file and prosecute litigation against the
Debtor-In-Possession's secured lenders and others if deemed
appropriate; and

     (h) Perform all other legal services for the
Debtor-In-Possession which may be necessary.

Mr. Hannon attests that he and his firm has no connection with the
Debtor-In-Possession, any personnel employed in the office of the
United States Trustee, the creditors or any other party in
interest. Nor does this attorney represent or hold any interest
adverse to the Debtor-In-Possession in possession of the estate
herein the matters upon which it is to be engaged, and his
employment would be in the best interest of the estates and its
creditors.

The standard hourly rate for the attorney is $385.00 per hour. He
was retained on September 25, 2019 and has received a retainer of
$10,000.00.  The retainer fund did not come from assets of the
estate, according to the Debtor.

The firm may be reached at:

     MARK J. HANNON, ESQ.
     1114 West Fremont
     Stockton, CA 95203
     Tel: (209) 942-2229

              About LAJ Construction

LAJ Construction Inc. owns six properties in Sacramento, California
valued by the Company at $18.86 million in the aggregate.  

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Cal. Case No. 19-25566) on September 4, 2019.  The Hon. Christopher
D. Jaime oversees the case.

In its petition, the Debtor disclosed $18,860,100 in assets and
$6,989,494 in liabilities.  The petition was signed by Madan Lal
Sharma, president.

The Debtor is represented by Mark J. Hannon, Esq.



LAJ CONSTRUCTION: Seeks to Hire Singh & McClean as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------------------
LAJ Construction Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of California to hire Singh & McClean, LLP
as its accountant.

The services to be provided by the firm include the preparation of
tax returns, examination of the Debtor's books and records, and
professional advice on its financial condition.

Singh & McClean will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Staff      $175
     Manager    $200
     Partner    $250

Peter Singh, managing member of Singh & McClean, attests that the
firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Peter Singh, CPA
     Singh & McClean, LLP
     9280 W Stockton Blvd Ste 228
     Elk Grove, CA 95758
     Phone: (916) 896-0236

                   About LAJ Construction Inc.

LAJ Construction Inc. owns six properties in Sacramento, Calif.,
valued by the company at $18.86 million.

LAJ Construction filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 19-25566) on Sep. 4,
2019. In the petition signed by Madan Lal Sharma, president, the
Debtor estimated $18,860,100 in assets and $6,989,494 in
liabilities. Mark J. Hannon, Esq., is the Debtor's counsel.  Judge
Christopher D. Jaime oversees the case.


LONE STAR BREWERY: Case Summary & 11 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Lone Star Brewery Development, Inc.
        500 & 600 Lone Star Blvd
        San Antonio, TX 78204

Business Description: Lone Star Brewery Development, Inc. owns in
                      fee simple a 32.25 acre industrial complex
                      in San Antonio, Texas, having an appraised
                      value of $30 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 6, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas

Case No.: 20-50058

Debtor's Counsel: Thomas Rice, Esq.
                  PULMAN, CAPPUCCIO & PULLEN, LLP
                  2161 NW Military Highway
                  Suite 400
                  San Antonio, TX 78213    
                  Tel: (210) 222-9494
                  Email: trice@pulmanlaw.com

Total Assets: $30,000,030

Total Liabilities: $27,133,447

The petition was signed by Keith Smith, president.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                     https://is.gd/x401oq

List of Debtor's 11 Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. NRP Properties, LLC            Contractual Claim       $550,000
1228 Euclid Avenue, 4th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44115

2. Newell Nano Family                Non-Purchase         $415,626
Limited Partnership                     Money
726 Probandt St., Suite 201
San Antonio, TX 78204

3. CFGI                               Accountant           $55,056
1835 Market Street
Suite 910
Philadelphia, PA 19103

4. Pine Hill Group                    Accountant           $46,618
1835 Market Street, Suite 910
Philadelphia, PA 19103

5. Williams Scotsman, Inc.           Construction          $16,265
PO Box 91975                         Trailer Lease
Chicago, IL 60693

6. David M. Abner & Associates       Attorney Fees          $6,090
747 Third Avenue, 2d Floor
New York, NY 10017

7. Stout Risius Ross, LLC                Trade              $4,668
P.O. Box 71770
Chicago, IL 60694

8. Robinson & Fogle                    Insurance            $4,335
Insurance Agency, Inc.
PO Box 932
Cypress, TX 77410

9. Statewide Patrol, Inc.                Trade              $3,546
8626 Tesoro Dr. Suite 504
San Antonio, TX 78217

10. UBEO of Austin, Inc.             Copier Lease           $1,867
PO Box 660831
Dallas, TX 75266

11. CPS Energy                          Utility               $368

PO Box 2678
San Antonio, TX 78289


LUCKY BUMS SUBSIDIARY: Hires Gravis Law as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Lucky Bums Subsidiary received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Montana to employ Gravis Law P.L.L.C. as
its special counsel.

The services to be provided by the firm include legal advice on
corporate, securities, tax, employment, human resources and
confidentiality issues involving its current and former employees.
The firm will also review basic contracts and other documents, and
will assist the Debtor in identifying and seeking financing and
investment.

Gravis Law will be paid as follows:

     Jeffrey Heutmaker        $325
     Managing Attorneys       $325
     Associate                $300
     Law Clerks               $200
     Paralegals               $150

Jeffrey Heutmaker, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be providing
the services, attests that he and his firm are "disinterested
persons" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Jeffrey Heutmaker, Esq.
     Gravis Law P.L.L.C.
     525 Railway Street, Suite 205
     Whitefish, MT 59937
     Phone: 406-510-0826

                   All About Lucky Bums Subsidiary

Lucky Bums Subsidiary LLC -- https://luckybums.com -- is a
wholesaler of sporting and recreation goods.  

Lucky Bums Subsidiary filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D. Mon. Case No. 19-61084) on Oct. 28, 2019, and is represented by
Matt Shimanek, Esq., at Shimanek Law P.L.L.C.  In its petition, the
Debtor listed under $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
Judge Benjamin P. Hursh oversees the case.


MAGNOLIA LANE: Seeks to Hire Florida Property as Manager
--------------------------------------------------------
Magnolia Lane Condominium Association, Inc. seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to
employ Florida Property Management Solutions, Inc. as its property
manager.

The Debtor requires the firm to:

     a. meet and discuss upcoming goals and activities for the
Debtor and prepare management reports;

     b. review, interpret and modify the Debtor's governing
documents in accordance with the Board of Directors' objectives;

     c. guide the board with the development or update of rules and
regulations along with enforcement procedures;

     d. prepare and distribute the Debtor's correspondence and
notices;

     e. prepare agenda and coordinate notices as per Florida
Statute requirements, mail proxies, ballots, voting certificates;

     f. conduct annual meetings and assist in the preparation of
minutes of the meeting;

     g. review insurance coverage and present recommendations;

     h. maintain central business office for the Debtor;

     i. maintain current records, including resident and unit owner
information, contracts, insurance premiums and accounting records
for the Debtor;

     j. prepare the Debtor's application package for potential
buyers and tenants;

     k. facilitate legal counsel assistance;

     l. respond to maintenance requests, concerns, suggestions,
complaints or questions in a prompt and systematic manner;

     m. provide a preventive maintenance program for the buildings
and grounds.

The firm will be paid a monthly fee of $2,496 for its services.

Florida Property is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined
in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent
any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Natalie Cedeno, LCAM
     Florida Property Management
     Solutions Inc.
     12964 SW 133 Court
     Miami, FL 33186
     Phone: 786-718-1622
     Fax: 786-718-1623

                  About Magnolia Lane Condominium Association

Based in Miami, Fla., Magnolia Lane Condominium Association, Inc.
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-24437) on
Oct. 28, 2019.  In the petition signed by Mercedes Rodriguez, vice
president, the Debtor was estimated to have $100,000 to $500,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  Judge Laurel
M. Isicoff oversees the case.  John P. Arcia, Esq., at John Paul
Arcia, P.A., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MANOMAY LLC: Seeks to Hire Blackwell Law as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Manomay LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida to hire Blackwell Law Firm as its
special counsel.

Blackwell Law will represent the Debtor in its case against Trek
Development Group Inc. to recover claims for breach of contract and
implied covenant of quiet enjoyment of Debtor's premises.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Dennis M. Blackwell      $350
     Mary Kathleen Blackwell  $350
     Nicolette A. Blackwell   $150
     Paralegal                $90

Blackwell Law is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Dennis M. Blackwell, Esq.
     The Blackwell Law Firm
     223 Fourth Avenue, 9th Fl.
     Pittsburgh, PA 15222
     Phone: (412) 391-5299

                      About Manomay LLC

Based in Altamonte Springs, Fla., Manomay LLC filed a voluntary
petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla.
Case No. 19-24450) on Nov. 14, 2019. At the time of the filing, the
Debtor disclosed assets of between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities of the same range.  Robert O Lampl Law Office is the
Debtor's legal counsel.  Judge Carlota M. Bohm oversees the case.


MARRONE BIO: Ospraie Entities Report 43.8% Stake as of Dec. 30
--------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Ospraie Ag Science LLC, Ospraie Management, LLC,
Ospraie Holding I, LP, Ospraie Management, Inc., and Dwight
Anderson disclosed that as of Dec. 30, 2019, they beneficially own
69,712,205 shares of common stock of Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.,
which represents 43.8 percent of the Shares outstanding.

On Dec. 30, 2019, following receipt of notice from the Issuer that
the Issuer was exercising its rights pursuant to the Warrant
Agreement to require Ospraie LLC to exercise warrants in exchange
for shares of Common Stock of the Issuer and New Warrants, Ospraie
LLC exercised 1,675,771 warrants into 1,675,771 shares of Common
Stock and 1,675,771 New Warrants.  Those New Warrants will be first
exercisable 180 days after issuance, will have a term expiring on
Jan. 1, 2023 and will have an exercise price of $1.75 per share.
As the New Warrants are not currently exercisable within 60 days,
the Reporting Persons do not presently beneficially own the shares
of Common Stock underlying such New Warrants for purposes of
Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
In addition, the Reporting Persons now beneficially own the shares
of Common Stock underlying the 8,378,871 New Warrants that were
acquired on Sept. 4, 2019, as such New Warrants are now exercisable
within 60 days.

A full-text copy of the rgulatory filing is available for free at
the SEC's website at:

                        https://is.gd/SHr2SE

                   About Marrone Bio Innovations

Based in Davis, California, Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. --
http://www.marronebio.com-- discovers, develops and sells
innovative biological products for crop protection, plant health
and waterway systems treatment.  MBI has screened over 18,000
microorganisms and 350 plant extracts, leveraging its in-depth
knowledge of plant and soil microbiomes enhanced by advanced
molecular technologies to rapidly develop seven effective and
environmentally responsible pest management products to help
customers operate more sustainably while uniquely improving plant
health and increasing crop yields.  Supported by a robust portfolio
of over 400 issued and pending patents around its natural product
chemistry, MBI's currently available commercial products are
Regalia, Grandevo, Venerate, Majestene, Haven Stargus and
Amplitude, Zelto and Zequanox.

Marrone Bio inccured a net loss of $20.21 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $30.92 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company
had $78.32 million in total assets, $53.76 million in total
liabilities, and $24.56 million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in San Francisco, CA, the Company's auditor since 2018,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated March
28, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has incurred
significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING: Michael W. Carmel Approved as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Medical Diagnostic Imaging Group, Ltd. and MDIG of Arizona,
LLC, sought and obtained permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Arizona to employ the law firm of Michael W.
Carmel, Ltd. as its bankruptcy counsel.

The professional services the Firm is to render are:

     (a)  To give the Debtors-in-Possession legal advice with
respect to its powers and duties in these proceedings;

     (b)  To prepare on behalf of the Debtors-in-Possession the
necessary applications, answers, orders, reports and other legal
papers; and

     (c)  To perform all other legal services for the
Debtors-in-Possession which may be necessary herein and is
necessary for the Debtors-in-Possession to employ an attorney for
such professional services.

The Firm's Michael W. Carmel charges $600.00 an hour for his
services.  Paralegals bill $135.00 per hour.

The Firm discloses that MDIG AZ may owe MDIG up to $5,179,065.51.
The Firm will wait for complete Schedules and Statement of
Financial Affairs to determine the extent of any and all
intercompany receivables and payables, and will supplement this
Application to disclose the proper amounts and nature of the
obligations.

The Firm attests it has indeed no connection with the creditors or
any other party in interest, or any of their respective attorneys,
or any person employed in the Office of the United States Trustee.

The Firm may be reached at:

     Michael W. Carmel, Esq.
     Law Offices of MICHAEL W. CARMEL, LTD.
     80 East Columbus Avenue
     Phoenix, AZ 85012-2334
     Telephone: (602) 264-4965
     Arizona State Bar No. 007356
     Facsimile: (602) 277-0144
     E-mail: Michael@mcarmellaw.com

           About Medical Diagnostic Imaging Group

The Medical Diagnostic Imaging Group, Ltd., and MDIG of Arizona,
LLC, are providers of diagnostic radiology services.

The Medical Diagnostic Imaging Group, Ltd., and MDIG of Arizona,
LLC, filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Lead Case No. 19-15722) on December 16, 2019.  Affiliates
MDIG of Pennsylvania, LLC, and MDIG of Washington, LLC, filed
separate Chapter 11 petitions on December 23, 2019.  The cases are
jointly administered before the Hon. Daniel P. Collins.

Each of the Debtors estimated $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  The petitions were signed by Dr. Christian
Ingui, the Debtors' president.

The Debtors are represented by Michael W. Carmel, Esq., at the Law
Offices of Michael W. Carmel, Ltd.



MILLMAC CORPORATION: Seeks to Hire Stichter Riedel as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Millmac Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to hire Stichter, Riedel, Blain
& Postler, P.A. as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:

     a. advise the Debtor of its powers and duties in the continued
operation of its businesses and the management of its properties;

     b. prepare legal papers;

     c. appear before the bankruptcy court and the Office of the
U.S. Trustee;

     d. assist in the negotiation and preparation of a plan of
reorganization;

     e. represent the Debtor in all adversary proceedings,
contested matters and matters involving the administration of the
case;

     f. represent the Debtor in negotiations with potential
financing sources and prepare contracts, security instruments and
other documents necessary to obtain financing; and

     g. represent the Debtor in sale negotiations with potential
purchasers, and prepare letters of intent, asset purchase
agreements and other documents.

Stichter Riedel will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates and will receive reimbursement for work-related
expenses incurred.

Susan Heath Sharp, Esq., a partner at Stichter Riedel, assures the
court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Susan Heath Sharp, Esq. (FBN 0716421)
     Stichter Riedel Blain & Postler, P.A.
     110 East Madison Street, Suite 200
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: (813) 229-0144
     Email: ssharp@srbp.com

                     About Millmac Corporation

Millmac Corporation is a provider of specialized marine labor, ship
repair and dredging for industrial and residential uses.

Based in Bartow, Fla., Millmac Corporation filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-11877) on Dec.
18, 2019. In the petition signed by Michael J. Miller, president,
the Debtor disclosed $1,308,639 in assets and $1,619,039 in
liabilities. Susan Heath Sharp, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain &
Postler, P.A., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


MODERN POULTRY: Has Until Feb. 28, 2020 to Achieve Confirmation
---------------------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 17, 2019, Judge James J. Robinson of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Eastern Division,
ordered that the deadline for debtor Modern Poultry Systems, LLC to
achieve confirmation is extended to February 28, 2020.

                 About Modern Poultry Systems

Modern Poultry Systems, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 19-40259) on Feb.
19, 2019. At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to
have assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of less than
$500,000. The case is assigned to Judge James J. Robinson. Tameria
S. Driskill, LLC, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


MORGAN ADMINISTRATION: Court Nixes Counsel's Meal Expense
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jacqueline P. Cox of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois disallowed $43.84 of the $13,819.07
in total expenses sought for reimbursement by Sugar Felsenthal
Grais & Helsinger LLP, bankruptcy counsel to Morgan Administration,
Inc.

The firm has sought approval of its final application for
compensation of its services as the Debtor's counsel totaling
$930,567, which the Court granted in its entirety.  The Court,
however, allowed only $13,775.23 of the $13,819.07 of expenses,
disallowing the portion for meal expense, saying that local meals
were not reasonably necessary for the proper representation of the
client, citing In Re Covent Guardian Corp., 103 B.R. 937, 942
(Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1989), "if the attorney were not working on the
case, he would still have to eat".

A copy of the order dated December 5, 2019 is available at
https://www.leagle.com/decision/inbco20191209578 from Leagle.com.

Devon J. Eggert, Beck, Chaet, Bamberger & Polsky, S.C., 30 East
Kilbourn Avenue, Tower 2 Suite 1085, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
53202-3170, Jonathan P. Friedland, Sugar Felsenthal Grais &
Helsinger LLP, 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago,
Illinois 60602, Mark Melickian, Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger
LLP, 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, Illinois 60602,
John R. O'Connor, Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP, 30 North
LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, Illinois 60602, Elizabeth B.
Vandesteeg, Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP, 30 North
LaSalle Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, Illinois 60602, counsel for
Morgan Administration, Inc., Debtor.

Devon J. Eggert, Beck, Chaet, Bamberger & Polsky, S.C., 30 East
Kilbourn Avenue, Tower 2 Suite 1085, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
53202-3170, counsel for Morgan Administration Creditor Trust,
Trustee.

Elizabeth L. Janczak, Freeborn & Peters LLP, 311 South Wacker
Drive, Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60606, counsel for Sandor Jacobson,
Trustee.

Shelly A. DeRousse, Freeborn & Peters LLP, 311 South Wacker Drive,
Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60606, Devon J. Eggert, Beck, Chaet,
Bamberger, Polsky, S.C., 30 East Kilbourn Avenue, Tower 2 Suite
1085, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202-3170, Elizabeth L. Janczak,
Freeborn & Peters LLP, 311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000, Chicago,
IL 60606, counsel for the Official Committee Of Unsecured
Creditors, Creditor Committee.

               About Morgan Administration

Morgan Administration, Inc., and its subsidiaries are
privately-held companies in Waukegan, Illinois, that operate
household appliance stores.  They collectively do business under
the trade name Home Owners Bargain Outlet or HOBO.

Morgan Administration and 10 affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No. 18-30039) on Oct. 25,
2018.  In the petition signed by Leo Schmidt, president, Morgan
Administration estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and
$100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge
Jacqueline P. Cox.

The Debtors tapped Jonathan P. Friedland, Esq., at Sugar Felsenthal
Grais & Helsinger LLP, as their bankruptcy counsel; and Michael
Goldman of KCP Advisory Group LLC as their chief restructuring
officer.

On Nov. 5, 2018, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditor of Morgan
Administration.  The Committee retained Freeborn & Peters LLP as
its counsel.





NEWSCO INTERNATIONAL: Hires Clark Hill as Bankruptcy Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Newsco International Energy Services USA Inc. seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to
hire Clark Hill Strasburger as its bankruptcy counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:  

     (a) advise the Debtor of its powers, rights and duties in the
continued management and operation of its business;

     (b) provide legal advice and consultation related to the legal
and administrative requirements of operating its bankruptcy case;

     (c) take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
Debtor's estate, including prosecuting actions on the Debtor's
behalf, defending any action commenced against the Debtor, and
representing the Debtor's interests in any negotiations or
litigation in which it may be involved;

     (d) prepare pleadings;

     (e) represent the Debtor's interests at the meeting of
creditors;

     (f) assist in the formulation, negotiation and implementation
of a Chapter 11 plan;

     (g) assist in the negotiation, documentation, implementation,
consummation and closing of corporate transactions, including sales
of assets;

     (h) advise the Debtor with respect to the use of cash
collateral and obtaining financing;

     (i) review all claims filed against the Debtor's estate;

     (j) advise the Debtor concerning the assumption, assignment,
rejection and renegotiation of executory contracts and unexpired
leases;

     (k) coordinate with other bankruptcy professionals to
rehabilitate the Debtor's affairs; and

     (l) advise the Debtor concerning any labor and
employment-related matters or disputes with current or former
employees and contractors.

Clark Hill will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Stephen A. Roberts     $655
     Herbert J. Gilles      $550
     Attorneys              $350 - $750
     Paralegals             $275 - $315

Clark Hill received a total of $60,000 as retainer.

Stephen  Roberts, Esq., a partner at Clark Hill, assured the court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Clark Hill can be reached at:

     Stephen A. Roberts, Esq.
     Clark Hill Strasburger
     720 Brazos, Suite 700
     Austin, TX 78701
     Phone: (512) 499-3624
     Email: sroberts@clarkhill.com

             About Newsco International
              Energy Services USA Inc.

Established in 1994, Newsco International Energy Services USA Inc.
-- www.newsco-drilling.com -- is a global directional drilling and
MWD (measurement while drilling) service company.

Newsco International Energy Services USA Inc. filed a voluntary
petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 19-36767) on Dec. 4, 2019. In the petition signed by Corey D.
Campbell, chief operating officer, the Debtor estimated $1 million
to $10 million in both assets and liabilities. Stephen A. Roberts,
Esq., at Clark Hill Strasburger, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


NORVIEW BUILDERS: Jan. 21, 2020 Plan & Confirmation Hearing Set
---------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Eastern Division, convened a hearing on the motion of debtor
Norview Builders Inc. to amend the order approving its disclosure
statement.

On Dec. 17, 2019, Judge Jacqueline Cox granted the motion and
approved the disclosure statement, and established the following
dates and deadlines:

   * Jan. 21, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. is the combined hearing to
consider approval of the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of
the Plan.

   * Jan. 17, 2020, is the deadline for submitting ballots on the
Plan.

   * Jan. 17, 2020, is the deadline for filing objections to
approval of the Disclosure Statement or confirmation of the Plan.

   * Jan. 20, 2020, is the deadline for the Debtor to file a
balloting report.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at
https://tinyurl.com/rlqjw7z from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

        William J. Factor
        Jeffrey K. Paulsen
        FACTORLAW
        105 W. Madison Street, Suite 1500
        Chicago, IL 60602
        Tel: (849)239-7248
        Fax: (847)574-8233
        E-mail: wfactor@wfactorlaw.com
                jpaulsen@wfactorlaw.com

                    About Norview Builders

Norview Builders, Inc., based in Oak Lawn, Ill., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-01825) on Jan. 22, 2018. In
the petition signed by Brenda P. O'Sullivan, president, the Debtor
was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in assets and
$500,000 to $1 million in liabilities. The Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox
oversees the case.  Gregory K. Stern, Esq., at Gregory K. Stern,
P.C., serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


NOS INC: Jan. 23, 2020 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor NOS Inc. d/b/a King Food Store filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee
Division, a disclosure statement dated December 12, 2019.

On Dec. 17, 2019, Judge Karen K. Specie conditionally approved the
disclosure statement and established the following dates and
deadlines:

   * Jan. 16, 2020, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement, and is fixed as the
last day for filing acceptances or rejections of the plan, in
accordance with Rules 3017(a) and 3017(c).

   * Jan. 23, 2020, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time is the confirmation
hearing to be held at 110 E. Park Avenue, 2nd Floor Courtroom,
Tallahassee, FL 32301.

                         About NOS Inc.

NOS, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 19-40593) on Nov. 5, 2019.  The
petition was signed by its authorized representative, Shivangi N.
Mehta. At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $1
million. Judge Karen K. Specie oversees the case. The Debtor is
represented by Bruner Wright, P.A.


NOSCE TE: Villarreal Backs Plan Filing Extension
------------------------------------------------
Omar E. Villarreal, a secured creditor, supports the motion of
debtor Nosce Te Ipsum, Inc., for a 90-day extension of the deadline
to file a Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement.

On November 27, 2019, Debtor filed an extension of time of 90 days
to file a Disclosure Statement and Plan.  On Dec. 3, 2019, an
entity identified as Metro 214, LLC, filed an Opposition to
Debtor's request.  Then a reply and sur-reply were filed by the
respective party.

"Debtor's request for an extension of the exclusivity period is
warranted because it will allow the Debtor to develop and negotiate
a suitable plan that will pay all claims including the secured
claim of the appearing party, with the benefit of preserving the
excess value of its property. A preliminary examination of the
motions filed by the party identified as Metro 214, LLC presents no
legal or factual basis to oppose an extension of the exclusivity
period for 90 days due by April 6, 2020," Villareal said.

Omar E. Villarreal is represented by:

     NELSON Robles-Diaz, Esq.
     NELSON ROBLES-DIAZ LAW OFFICES, P.S.C.
     P. O. Box 190998
     San Juan, Puerto Rico 00919-0998
     Tel: (787) 294-9518
     Fax: (787) 294-9519
     E-mail: nroblesdiaz@gmail.com

                    About Nosce Te Ipsum

Nosce Te Ipsum, Inc. classifies its business as single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  It owns in fee
simple a five-story building with office and commercial spaces for
lease, and adjacent parking lot structure in Guaynabo, P.R., valued
at $7 million.

Nosce Te Ipsum filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.P.R. Case
No.19-05155) on Sept. 9, 2019. In the petition signed by Maria De
Los A. Ubarri, general manager, the Debtor disclosed $7,046,991 in
assets and $5,210,939 in liabilities. The Hon. Brian K. Tester
oversees the case. Andrew Jimenez Cancel, Esq., at Andrew Jimenez
Law Offices, is the bankruptcy counsel.


O-I GLASS: Business as Usual While Paddock in Chapter 11
--------------------------------------------------------
O-I Glass, Inc. said its wholly owned subsidiary, Paddock
Enterprises, LLC, has voluntarily filed for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to equitably and finally resolve all of its
current and future asbestos related claims.

On Dec. 27, 2019, O-I Glass announced the adoption of a new holding
company structure whereby O-I Glass became the new parent entity
with Owens-Illinois Group, Inc. and Paddock as direct, wholly owned
subsidiaries. The Company's legacy asbestos-related liabilities are
isolated within Paddock, structurally separating them from the
Company's glassmaking operations, which remain under O-I Group.

O-I Glass and O-I Group are not included in the Chapter 11 filing
and will continue to operate as usual throughout Paddock's Chapter
11 process.

O-I Glass Chief Executive Officer Andres Lopez and Chief Financial
Officer John Haudrich were slated to hold a conference call to
discuss these developments on Jan. 6, 2020, at 10:30 a.m., EST.  A
replay of the call will be available on the O-I Glass website,
www.o-i.com/investors, for a year following the call.

A copy of the O-I Glass' presentation to investors is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yhpwgls2

Andres Lopez, CEO of O-I Glass, said, "Addressing Paddock's legacy
liabilities through Chapter 11 will help enable O-I Glass to
further unlock the value creation potential of this global
franchise."

"By improving the Company's capital structure, this important step
will support a number of critical strategic efforts and
possibilities as O-I Glass leverages its position as the world's
leading manufacturer of sustainable glass packaging."

After exiting a business in 1958 that produced Kaylo, an
asbestos-containing thermal insulation product, the Company has
disposed of over 400,000 asbestos-related claims and incurred gross
expense of approximately $5 billion for asbestos-related costs.
Lopez continued, "Paddock evaluated its options and determined that
a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization was the most fair and equitable
way to obtain certainty and finality in addressing its legacy
asbestos-related liabilities. Pending final resolution of the
Chapter 11 proceeding, all asbestos-related claims payments will be
suspended."

Paddock's ultimate goal in its Chapter 11 case is to confirm a plan
of reorganization under Section 524(g) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
and utilize this specialized provision to establish a trust that
will address all current and future asbestos-related claims.
Paddock has been and remains committed to fairly and equitably
compensating claimants who are ill and have legitimate exposure to
the Kaylo products manufactured by its predecessor from 1948-1958.
Paddock looks forward to working swiftly and constructively to
confirm a plan of reorganization and is committed to emerging from
bankruptcy as expediently as possible.

Additional information about the Chapter 11 case can be found at
https://cases.primeclerk.com/Paddock Paddock is advised in this
matter by Latham & Watkins LLP and Alvarez & Marsal.

                     About O-I Glass

With global headquarters in Perrysburg, Ohio, O-I Glass, Inc.
(NYSE: OI), produces bottles and jars for many of the world's
leading food and beverage brands.  With more than 26,500 people at
78 plants in 23 countries, O-I Glass has a global impact, achieving
revenues of $6.9 billion in 2018.



PADDOCK ENTERPRISES: In Chapter 11 to Address Asbestos Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Paddock Enterprises, LLC, a subsidiary of O-I Glass, Inc., has
voluntarily filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
equitably and finally resolve all of its current and future
asbestos related claims.

On December 27, 2019, O-I Glass announced the adoption of a new
holding company structure whereby O-I Glass became the new parent
entity with Owens-Illinois Group, Inc., and Paddock as direct,
wholly owned subsidiaries.  The Company's legacy asbestos-related
liabilities are isolated within Paddock, structurally separating
them from the Company's glassmaking operations, which remain under
O-I Group.  O-I Glass and O-I Group are not included in the Chapter
11 filing and will continue to operate as usual throughout
Paddock's Chapter 11 process.

Andres Lopez, CEO of O-I Glass, said, "Addressing Paddock's legacy
liabilities through Chapter 11 will help enable O-I Glass to
further unlock the value creation potential of this global
franchise."

"By improving the Company's capital structure, this important step
will support a number of critical strategic efforts and
possibilities as O-I Glass leverages its position as the world's
leading manufacturer of sustainable glass packaging."

After exiting a business in 1958 that produced Kaylo, an
asbestos-containing thermal insulation product, the Company has
disposed of over 400,000 asbestos-related claims and incurred gross
expense of approximately $5 billion for asbestos-related costs.
Lopez continued, "Paddock evaluated its options and determined that
a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization was the most fair and equitable
way to obtain certainty and finality in addressing its legacy
asbestos-related liabilities. Pending final resolution of the
Chapter 11 proceeding, all asbestos-related claims payments will be
suspended."

Paddock's ultimate goal in its Chapter 11 case is to confirm a plan
of reorganization under Section 524(g) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
and utilize this specialized provision to establish a trust that
will address all current and future asbestos-related claims.
Paddock has been and remains committed to fairly and equitably
compensating claimants who are ill and have legitimate exposure to
the Kaylo products manufactured by its predecessor from 1948-1958.
Paddock looks forward to working swiftly and constructively to
confirm a plan of reorganization and is committed to emerging from
bankruptcy as expediently as possible.

                    About Paddock Enterprises

Paddock Enterprises, LLC's business operations are exclusively
focused on (1) owning and managing certain real property and (2)
owning interests in, and managing the operations of, its non-Debtor
subsidiary, Meigs, which is developing an active real estate
business.  In addition, the Debtor is responsible for managing its
historical asbestos and environmental liabilities through resources
available under a Services Agreement and outside advisors.  Paddock
Enterprises is the successor-by-merger to Owens-Illinois, Inc.,
which previously served as the ultimate parent of the Debtor.
Paddock Enterprises is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of O-I
Glass ("Current Parent").

Paddock sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
20-10028) on Jan. 6, 2020.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

Paddock is advised in this matter by Latham & Watkins LLP and
Alvarez & Marsal.  Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., is the local
counsel.  Bates White LLC is providing estimation-related guidance
with respect to its asbestos claims.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent, maintaining the page
https://cases.primeclerk.com/Paddock


PADDOCK ENTERPRISES: Mulls Sec. 524(g) Trust for Asbestos Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paddock Enterprises, LLC, which has sought Chapter 11 protection,
is the successor-by-merger to Owens-Illinois, Inc.  The Debtor is
annually subject to hundreds of claims and lawsuits alleging
personal injuries and death from exposure to asbestos contained in
products manufactured under the "Kaylo" brand between 1948 and
1958, which were primarily pipe covering and block insulation
products.  These products contained either chrysotile or amosite
asbestos fibers, depending on the year of manufacture, and had
extremely limited applications, such as for high temperature piping
in large industrial settings.

The Debtor's predecessor sold its entire Kaylo business to Owens
Corning Fiberglass Corporation in 1958 and has not manufactured or
sold any Kaylo products since then.  No other entities within the
Company were ever involved in the production or sale of Kaylo
products.

Owens Corning filed for chapter 11 protection in October 2000 and
confirmed its plan of reorganization with a section 524(g) trust in
September of 2006.  The Owens Corning 524(g) trust has been making
payments on account of Kaylo-related asbestos claims since then.

David J. Gordon, president of DJG Services, LLC, who is presently
serving as president and CRO of Paddock, explains that despite
having only produced Kaylo products for a fraction of the total
production window, the Debtor continues to fund an outsized share
of tort recoveries.  This situation arises in part because the
section 524(g) trust system operates independently of the tort
system, which allows for plaintiffs to recover from defendants in
the tort system, collect their full damages, and then collect
significant damages from trusts based on evidence they subsequently
submit, even when it alleges exposure to the same product.  It also
arises because the cost of defending asbestos claims in the tort
system has risen.  The Debtor currently has approximately 900
personal injury lawsuits pending against it throughout the country,
many of which are currently dormant in status.

These lawsuits typically allege various theories of liability,
including negligence, gross negligence and strict liability, and
seek compensatory and, in some cases, punitive damages. Each
lawsuit requires the Debtor to incur a range of tens to hundreds of
thousands of dollars or more in attorneys' fees and costs alone.

In contrast to many other companies' pure litigation approach,
however, most Asbestos Claims are presented to the Debtor through a
variety of administrative claims-handling agreements.  The Company
long believed that it and its various stakeholders were best served
by proactively managing its asbestos-related liabilities outside of
the tort system through such agreements.  This strategy has
historically allowed the Debtor more predictability in managing
risk and its annual asbestos-related financial obligations.

However, the Company's ability to reasonably estimate and reserve
for the Debtor's asbestos related tort expenditures has been
significantly affected by, among other factors, changes in claiming
patterns; changes in the law, procedure, and asbestos docket
management; and pressure on settlement values driven by
co-defendant bankruptcies, adverse tort system developments, and
the Debtor's status as one of the only remaining solvent "amosite"
defendants.  These factors have also made Administrative Claims
Agreements -- at least on existing payment terms -- difficult to
maintain, and therefore less reliable to the Debtor.

The Company has for many years conducted an annual comprehensive
legal review of its asbestos-related tort expenditures in
connection with finalizing its annual results of operations in its
public filings. Beginning in 2003, the Company had been estimating
its asbestos related tort expenditures based on an analysis of how
far in the future it could reasonably estimate the number of claims
it would receive, which was several years. In April 2016, the
Company adjusted its method for estimating its future
asbestos-related tort expenditures in compliance with accounting
standards codification ("ASC") 450, Contingencies. With the
assistance of an external consultant, and utilizing a model with
actuarial inputs, the Company developed a new method for reasonably
estimating its total asbestos-related tort expenditures, which made
several adjustments to consider the probable losses for Asbestos
Claims not yet asserted, as well as related costs it could properly
include in its estimate.

Although the Company did not record any additional asbestos-related
charges at the end of 2016 or 2017, as of December 31, 2018, the
revised methodology led the Company to:

     (i) conclude that a charge of $125 million was necessary,
which produced a year-end accrual of $602 million for reasonably
probable asbestos-related tort expenditures; and

    (ii) estimate that reasonably possible losses could result in
asbestos-related tort expenditures up to $722 million (both stated
in nominal dollars).

The Debtor believes that, although the established reserves are
appropriate under ASC 450, its ultimate asbestos-related tort
expenditures cannot be known with certainty because, among other
reasons, the litigation environment in the tort system has
deteriorated generally for mass tort defendants and Administrative
Claims Agreements are becoming less reliable.

What is certain is the incredible disparity between what the Debtor
has historically paid, and is now being asked to pay, for Asbestos
Claims, given the extent of its historical asbestos-related
operations.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Debtor had disposed of over
400,000 Asbestos Claims, and had incurred gross expense of
approximately $5 billion for asbestos-related costs.

In contrast, its total Kaylo sales for the 10-year period in which
it sold the product were approximately $40 million.

Asbestos-related cash payments for 2018, 2017, and 2016 alone were
$105 million, $110 million, and $125 million, respectively.
Although these cash payments show a modest decline, the overall
volume and claimed value of Asbestos Claims asserted against the
Debtor has not declined in proportion to the facts that (i) over 60
years have passed since the Debtor exited the Kaylo business, (ii)
the average age of the vast majority of its claimants is now over
83 years old, (iii) these demographics produce increasingly limited
opportunities to demonstrate legitimate occupational Kaylo
exposures, and (iv) other recoveries are available from trusts
established by other asbestos defendants.

Rather, increasing settlement values have been demanded of the
Debtor. And because the Debtor has settled or otherwise exhausted
all insurance that might cover Asbestos Claims, it must satisfy all
asbestos-related expenses out of Company cash flows.

For years, the Debtor has paid more for its Asbestos Claims than
its industry peers whose liabilities are paid by section 524(g)
trusts. This is principally due to the inherent differences between
the tort system and section 524(g) trust distribution procedures.
The procedural and legal differences even among different
jurisdictions in the tort system -- such as joint-and-several
liability -- allow these disparities to exist in the extreme, which
usually results in the Debtor paying different claim amounts to
otherwise similarly-situated plaintiffs.  This situation is neither
fair to the Company and its stakeholders nor to asbestos
claimants.

The Debtor attests that it remains committed -- as it has since the
first Asbestos Claim brought against it -- to fairly and equitably
compensating claimants who are ill and have legitimate exposure to
Kaylo products that the Debtor's predecessor last manufactured more
than 60 years ago.  However, because the Company continues to face
claims that increase in value, despite the fact that one would
reasonably expect claims arising from the relevant manufacturing
period to tail off and become more difficult to prove, the Debtor
has concluded -- consistent with the Company's overall strategy of
rationalizing and streamlining expenses -- that the best path for
fairness, certainty, and finality is only available through a
Chapter 11 Case.

                    About Paddock Enterprises

Paddock Enterprises, LLC's business operations are exclusively
focused on (1) owning and managing certain real property and (2)
owning interests in, and managing the operations of, its non-Debtor
subsidiary, Meigs, which is developing an active real estate
business.  In addition, the Debtor is responsible for managing its
historical asbestos and environmental liabilities through resources
available under the Services Agreement and outside advisors.
Paddock Enterprises is the successor-by-merger to Owens-Illinois,
Inc., which previously served as the ultimate parent of the Debtor.
Paddock Enterprises is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of O-I
Glass ("Current Parent").

Paddock sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Case No.
20-10028) on Jan. 6, 2020.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

Paddock is advised in this matter by Latham & Watkins LLP and
Alvarez & Marsal.  Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., is the local
counsel.  Bates White LLC is providing estimation-related guidance
with respect to its asbestos claims.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent, maintaining the page
https://cases.primeclerk.com/Paddock


PADDOCK ENTERPRISES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Paddock Enterprises, LLC
        One Michael Owens Way, Plaza 2
        Perrysburg, OH 43551-2999

Business Description: Paddock Enterprises, LLC's business
                      operations are exclusively focused on (1)
                      owning and managing certain real property
                      and (2) owning interests in, and managing
                      the operations of, its non-Debtor
                      subsidiary, Meigs, which is developing an
                      active real estate business.  In addition,
                      the Debtor is responsible for managing its
                      historical asbestos and environmental
                      liabilities through resources available
                      under the Services Agreement and outside
                      advisors.  Paddock Enterprises is the
                      successor-by-merger to Owens-Illinois, Inc.,
                      which previously served as the ultimate
                      parent of the Debtor.  Paddock Enterprises
                      is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of O-I
                      Glass ("Current Parent").

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 6, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Delaware

Case No.: 20-10028

Judge: Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein

Debtor's Counsel: Michael J. Merchant, Esq.
                  RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A.
                  One Rodney Square, 920 North King Street
                  Wilmington, DE 19801
                  Tel: 302-651-7700
                  E-mail: merchant@rlf.com

                     - and -

                  LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Debtor's
Financial
Advisor:          ALVAREZ & MARSAL NORTH AMERICA, LLC

Debtor's
Claims,
Noticing,
Solicitation Agent &
Administrative
Advisor:          PRIME CLERK, LLC
                  https://cases.primeclerk.com/paddock

Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Liabilities: $100 million to $500 million

The petition was signed by David J. Gordon, chief restructuring
officer.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at
PacerMonitor.com at:

                      https://is.gd/eNKfkR

Debtor's List of The Top 24 Law Firm With The Most Significant
Representations of Asbestos Claimants:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim    Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------    ------------
1. Weitz & Luxenberg P.C.             Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Perry Weitz                      Injury          Contingent/
700 Broadway                                          Unliquidated
New York, NY 10003
Tel: (212) 558-5500
Fax: (212) 344-5461
Email: pweitz@weitzlux.com

2. Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC           Personal           Disputed/
Attn: John A. Barnerd                  Injury          Contingent/
One Court Street                                      Unliquidated
Alton, IL 62002
Tel: (618) 259-2222
Fax: (618) 259-2251
Email: jbarnerd@simmonsfirm.com

3. Cooney & Conway                    Personal           Disputed/
Attn: William R. Fahey                 Injury          Contingent/
120 North LaSalle Street, Suite 3000                  Unliquidated
Chicago, IL 60602
Tel: (312) 236-6166
Fax: (312) 236-3029
Email: bfahey@cooneyconway.com

4. Law Offices of Peter               Personal           Disputed/
Angelos, P.C.                          Injury          Contingent/
Attn: Armand J. Volta, Jr.                            Unliquidated
100 North Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
Tel: (410) 649-2000
Fax: (410) 649-2101
Email: AVolta@lawpga.com
  
5. Waters Kraus & Paul, LLP           Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Peter A. Kraus                   Injury          Contingent/
3141 Hood Street, Suite 700                           Unliquidated
Dallas, Texas 75219
Toll Free: (866) 305-7373
Tel: (214) 357-6244
Fax: (214) 357-7252
Email: kraus@waterskraus.com

6. Maune Raichle Hartley              Personal           Disputed/
French & Mudd, LLC                     Injury          Contingent/
Attn: Nate Mudd                                       Unliquidated
2 Club Centre Court, Suite 4
Edwardsville, Illinois 62025
Tel: (800) 259-9249
Email: nmudd@mrhfmlaw.com

7. Brayton Purcell LLP                Personal          Dispuated/
Attn: David R. Donadio                 Injury          Contingent/
222 Rush Landing Road                                 Unliquidated
Novato, CA 94945
Tel: (415) 895-2669
Fax: (415) 898-1247
Email: ddonadio@braytonlaw.com

8. The Gori Law Firm                  Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Randy L. Gori                    Injury          Contingent/
156 North Main Street                                 Unliquidated
Edwardsville, IL 62025
Tel: (618) 659-9833
Fax: (618) 659-9834
Email: randy@gorijulianlaw.com

9. Early, Lucarelli,                  Personal           Disputed/
Sweeney & Meisenkothen, LLC            Injury          Contingent/
Attn: James F. Early                                  Unliquidated
265 Church Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Tel: (203) 777-7799
Fax: (203) 785-1671
Email: jfe@elslaw.com

10. Simon Greenstone                  Personal           Disputed/
Panatier, P.C.                         Injury          Contingent/
Attn: Jeffery B. Simon                                Unliquidated
1201 Elm Street, Suite 3400
Dallas, TX 75270
Tel: (214) 276-7680
Fax: (214) 276-7699
Email: jsimon@sgptrial.com

11. Levy Konigsberg LLP               Personal           Disputed/
Attn: John Paul Guinan                 Injury          Contingent/
800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor                          Unliquidated
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 605-6206
Fax: (212) 605-6290
Email: jguinan@levylaw.com

12. The Lanier Law Firm PLLC          Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Darron E. Berquist               Injury          Contingent/
Tower 56                                              Unliquidated
126 East 56th Street, 6th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 421-2800
Fax: (713) 659-2204
Email: Darron.Berquist@LanierLawFirm.com

13. Goldberg, Persky,                 Personal           Disputed/
Jennings & White, P.C.                 Injury          Contingent/
Attn: Bruce E. Mattock                                Unliquidated
11 Stanwix Street, Suite 1800
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Tel: (412) 471-3980
Fax: (412) 471-8308
Email: bmattock@gpwlaw.com

14. Patten, Wornom, Hatten &          Personal           Disputed/
Diamonstein, L.C.                      Injury           Contigent/
Attn: Robert R. Hatten                                Unliquidated
12350 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 300
Newport News, VA 23602
Tel: (757) 223-4546
Fax: (757) 249-3242
Email: RRHatten@pwhd.com

15. Bergman Draper Oslund             Personal           Disputed/
Udo, PLLC                              Injury          Contingent/
Attn: Glenn S. Draper                                 Unliquidated
821 2nd Avenue, Suite 2100
Seattle, WA 98104
Tel: (206) 957-9510
Fax: (206) 957-9549
Email: glenn@bergmanlegal.com

16. Shrader & Associates, L.L.P.      Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Justin Shrader                   Injury          Contingent/
9 Greenway Plaza, Suite 2300                          Unliquidated
Houston, TX 77046
Tel: (713) 338-9094
Fax: (713) 571-9605
Email: justin@shraderlaw.com

17. Savinis, Kane &                   Personal           Disputed/
Gallucci, L.L.C.                       Injury          Contingent/
Attn: John R. Kane                                    Unliquidated
707 Grant Street, Suite 3626
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Tel: (412) 567-4931
Fax: (412) 227-6445
Email: kane@sdklaw.com

18. The Nemeroff Law Firm             Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Rick Nemeroff                    Injury          Contingent/
Hillcrest Tower                                       Unliquidated
12720 Hillcrest Road #700
Dallas, TX 75230
Tel: (214) 774-2258
Email: ricknemeroff@nemerofflaw.com

19. Baron & Budd, P.C.                Personal           Disputed/
Attn: J. Todd Kale                     Injury          Contingent/
3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, #1100                           Unliquidated
Dallas, TX 75219
Tel: (214) 521-3605
Fax: (214) 520-1181
Email: tkale@baronbudd.com

20. Worthington & Caron, P.C.         Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Roger G. Worthington             Injury          Contingent/
273 West 7th Street                                   Unliquidated
San Pedro, CA 90731
Tel: (800) 831-9399
Email: rworthington@rgwpc.com

21. Dean Omar Branham                 Personal           Disputed/
Shirley, LLP                           Injury          Contingent/
Attn: Jessica Dean                                    Unliquidated
302 North Market Street, Suite 300
Dallas, TX 75202
Tel: (214) 722-5990
Email: jdean@dobslegal.com

22. The O'Brien Law Firm, P.C.        Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Andrew O'Brien                   Injury          Contingent/
815 Geyer Avenue                                      Unliquidated
St. Louis, MO 63104
Tel: (866) 588-0588
Email: obrien@obrienlawfirm.com

23. Danziger & De Llano, LLP          Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Michelle Whitman                 Injury          Contingent/
440 Louisiana Street, Suite 1212                      Unliquidated
Houston, TX 77002
Tel: (713) 222-9998
Fax: (713) 222-8866
Email: paul@dandell.com

24. Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC        Personal           Disputed/
Attn: Aaron Heckaman                   Injury          Contingent/
5555 San Felipe Street, Suite 900                     Unliquidated
Houston, TX 77056
Tel: (888) 367-7160
Email: aheckaman@bchlaw.com


PAPS CAB: Seeks to Hire Alla Kachan P.C. as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------
Paps Cab Corp. and its debtor-affiliates seek approval from the US
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ the
Law Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C. as their attorney.

Paps Cab requires Alla Kachan P.C. to:

     a) assist the Debtor in administering this case;

     b) make such motions or taking such action as may be
appropriate or necessary under the Bankruptcy Code;

     c) represent the Debtor in prosecuting adversary proceedings
to collect assets of the estate and such other actions as Debtor
deem appropriate;

     d) take such steps as may be necessary for Debtor to marshal
and protect the estate's assets;

     e) negotiate with the Debtor's creditors in formulating a plan
of reorganization for Debtor in this case;

     f) draft and prosecute the confirmation of the Debtor's plan
of reorganization in the bankruptcy case; and

     g) render such additional services as the Debtor may require
in the bankruptcy case.

The Debtor proposes to pay an hourly fee of $400 to Alla Kachan
attorneys and an hourly fee of $200 for clerks and
paraprofessionals.  The initial retainer is $13,000.

The firm is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

Alla Kachan can be reached through:

     Alla Kachan, Esq.
     Law Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C.
     3099 Coney Island Avenue
     Brooklyn, New York 11235
     Tel: +1 718-513-3145

                About Paps Cab Corp.

Paps Cab Corp., Vicmarie Hacking, Corp. and Snowstorm Hacking,
Corp. concurrently filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-47238) on
Dec. 2, 2019, listing under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities. Alla Kachan, Esq. at LAW OFFICES OF ALLA KACHAN, P.C.
represents the Debtors as counsel.


PAPS CAB: Seeks to Hire Wisdom Professional as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------
Paps Cab Corp. and its debtor-affiliates seek approval from the US
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ
Wisdom Professional Services, Inc., as their accountant.

Paps Cab requires Wisdom Professional to:

     a. gather and verify all pertinent information required to
compile and prepare monthly operating reports; and

     b. prepare monthly operating reports for the Debtor.

Wisdom Professional will be paid 100 per report.

Wisdom Professional received an initial retainer of $1,000 on Nov.
29, 2019.

Wisdom Professional will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael Shtarkman, a partner at Wisdom Professional Services,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Wisdom Professional can be reached at:

     Michael Shtarkman
     WISDOM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC.
     2546 E 17th St.
     Brooklyn, NY 11235
     Tel: (718) 554-6672

                About Paps Cab Corp.

Paps Cab Corp., Vicmarie Hacking, Corp. and Snowstorm Hacking,
Corp. concurrently filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-47238) on
Dec. 2, 2019, listing under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities. Alla Kachan, Esq. at LAW OFFICES OF ALLA KACHAN, P.C.
represents the Debtors as counsel.


PLUS THERAPEUTICS: Appoints Dr. An van Es-Johansson to Board
------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. An van Es-Johansson has joined Plus Therapeutics, Inc.'s Board
of Directors to serve as an independent director, effective Jan. 1,
2020.

Dr. van Es-Johansson currently serves as the chief medical officer
for AlzeCure Pharma, a Swedish pharmaceutical company with a
primary focus on Alzheimer's disease, where she is responsible for
regulatory, clinical development, clinical operations, and
pharmacovigilance.  From 2005-2018, Dr. van Es-Johansson served in
a range of executive roles of increasing responsibility at Swedish
Orphan Biovitrum AB (Sobi), an international specialty
biopharmaceutical company focused on rare diseases.  Dr. van
Es-Johansson has leadership experience within large pharmaceutical
and smaller biotechnology companies, including Roche, Eli Lilly,
Active Biotech, and BioStratum.  She currently serves on the Board
of Directors at BioInvent International AB, Medivir AB, Agendia
Inc., Savara Inc., and AlzeCure Pharma AB.  Dr. van Es-Johansson
received a M.D. from Erasmus University in Rotterdam, The
Netherlands.

"We are excited to welcome Dr. van-Es Johansson to our Board of
Directors.  An is an expert in developing orphan drugs that receive
FDA and EMA product approval and achieve commercial success.
Further, she has held global leadership roles across multiple
disciplines of the life sciences industry, including clinical
development, regulatory, and medical affairs, that will strengthen
Plus' experience in those areas," said Dr. Marc Hedrick, president
and CEO of Plus Therapeutics.

"Plus' nanotechnology platform and DocePLUS Phase 2-ready orphan
drug product candidate for small cell lung cancer have the
potential to substantially improve the lives of patients battling
cancer and rare diseases," commented Dr. van Es-Johansson.  "In
addition to helping advance DocePLUS toward regulatory approval, I
look forward to supporting the organization in further expanding
and strengthening its pipeline to help more patients in need."

                       About Plus Therapeutics

Plus Therapeutics, formerly known as Cytori Therapeutics, Inc., is
a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on the discovery,
development, and manufacturing scale up of complex and innovative
treatments for patients battling cancer and other life-threatening
diseases.  The Company is headquartered in located in Austin,
Texas, with a manufacturing facility in San Antonio, TX and a
satellite office in San Diego, CA.

Cytori reported a net loss of $12.63 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018 compared to a net loss of $22.68 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had $25.71
million in total assets, $25.55 million in total liabilities, and
$160,000 in total stockholders' equity.

BDO USA, LLP, in San Diego, California, the Company's auditor since
2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
March 29, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that Cytori has suffered
recurring losses from operations that raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.


POLYLAST SYSTEMS: Hires Allan D. NewDelman as Bankruptcy Attorney
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Polylast Systems, LLC, sought and obtained authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to employ Allan
D. NewDelman, P.C. as its attorney.

The professional services that Allan D. NewDelman, P.C. is to
render are:

(a)  To give the Debtor legal advice with respect to all matters
related to this case;

(b)  To prepare on behalf of the Debtor, as Debtor-In-Possession,
necessary applications, answers, orders, reports and other legal
papers; and

(c)  To perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
be necessary.

The Debtor needs to employ bankruptcy counsel to undertake certain
action that may be appropriate or necessary in connection with the
preservation and realization of the equity of the Chapter 11
estate. Further, it is necessary and appropriate to employ Counsel
to advise the Debtor so that it may properly comply with all
provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure, the Local Bankruptcy Rules and the requirements and
guidelines of the United States Trustee.

The hourly billing rates of attorneys and para-professionals for
Counsel in this matter are:

     Allan D. NewDelman at $425.00 per hour
     Roberta J. Sunkin at $395.00 per hour
     Paralegal at $150.00 - $200.00 per hour

The Firm attests that it represents no interest adverse to the
Debtor or the estate and that the Firm's employment as bankruptcy
counsel would be in the best interest of the Chapter 11 estate.

The firm may be reached at:

     Allan D. NewDelman, Esq.
     ALLAN D. NEWDELMAN, P.C.
     80 East Columbus Avenue
     Phoenix, AZ 85012
     Tel: (602) 264-4550
     Email: anewdelman@adnlaw.net

                   About Polylast Systems

Polylast Systems, LLC, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 19- 15557) on December 11, 2019, listing
under $50,000 in assets and liabilities, and is represented by
Allan D. NewDelman, Esq., at Allan D. NewDelman, P.C.



PORTERS NECK: Has Until Jan. 17, 2020 to File Plan & Disclosures
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North
Carolina, Wilmington Division, convened a hearing on the motion of
debtor Porters Neck Country Club, Inc., for an extension of time to
file Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse ordered that the Debtor is allowed
up to and including Jan. 17, 2020, to complete and file its Plan of
Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

                About Porters Neck Country Club

Porters Neck Country Club, Inc. --
https://www.portersneckcountryclub.com/ -- is a full-service
country club, boasting an 18-hole, Tom Fazio-designed golf course,
in Wilmington, North Carolina. The club, which promotes a family
oriented environment, also has seven state-of-the-art Har-Tru
tennis courts, a swimming complex, a fitness center and dining
facilities.

Porters Neck Country Club sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-04309) on Sept. 19, 2019, in Wilmington, N.C.
The Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in
assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing. The Hon. Joseph
N. Callaway is the case judge. Hendren Redwine & Malone, PLLC is
the Debtor's counsel.


PROFESSIONAL DIVERSITY: Receives Noncompliance Notice from Nasdaq
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Professional Diversity Network, Inc. received a letter from The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC on Jan. 2, 2020, stating that since the
Company has not yet held an annual meeting of shareholders within
twelve months of the end of the Company's fiscal year end, it no
longer complies with Nasdaq's Listing Rules for continued listing.
The letter further stated that under the Listing Rules the Company
has 45 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance and if
Nasdaq accepts such plan, it can grant an exception of up to 180
calendar days from the fiscal year end, or until June 29, 2020, to
regain compliance.

The Board of Directors of the Company resolved to postpone the
Company's 2019 shareholder meeting pending the results of the
independent investigation being conducted by the special committee
of the Board with assistance from independent outside legal counsel
and auditor.  The Company intends to submit a plan to Nasdaq to
regain compliance as soon as possible.

                     About Professional Diversity

Headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Professional Diversity Network,
Inc. -- https://www.prodivnet.com -- is a dynamic operator of
professional networks with a focus on diversity.  The Company uses
the term "diversity" to describe communities, or "affinities," that
are distinctly based on a wide array of criteria which may change
from time to time, including ethnic, national, cultural, racial,
religious or gender classification. It serves a variety of such
communities, including Women, Hispanic-Americans,
African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Disabled, Military
Professionals, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender.  Its
goal is (i) to assist its registered users and members in their
efforts to connect with like-minded individuals, identify career
opportunities within the network and (ii) connect members with
prospective employers while helping the employers address their
workforce diversity needs.

The Company reported a net loss of $15.08 million in 2018 following
a net loss of $22.29 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the
Company had $9.30 million in total assets, $5.74 million in total
liabilities, and $3.56 million in total stockholders' equity.

At Sept. 30, 2019 the Company's principal sources of liquidity were
its cash and cash equivalents and the net proceeds from the sales
of shares of common stock in the first nine months of 2019.

The Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $87,534,000
at Sept. 30, 2019.  During the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2019,
the Company generated a net loss from continuing operations of
approximately $2,726,000, used cash in continuing operations of
approximately $3,424,000, and the Company expects that it will
continue to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future.
At Sept. 30, 2019, the Company had a cash balance of approximately
$4,862,000.  Total revenues were approximately $1,348,000 and
$1,895,000 for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively, and approximately $4,021,000 and $6,327,000 for the
nine months ended Sept. 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  The
Company had working capital of approximately $149,000 and working
capital deficit of $3,384,000 at Sept. 30, 2019 and Dec. 31, 2018,
respectively.  The Company said these conditions raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


RAMBUTAN THAI: Grobstein Teeple Approved as Accountants
-------------------------------------------------------
Rambutan Thai, a California corporation, sought and obtained
permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District
of California to employ Grobstein Teeple LLP as its accountants
effective November 2, 2019.

The Debtor has determined that it is necessary and appropriate to
retain the services of an accountant to provide certain specified
services as well as those typically provided by a certified public
accountant on behalf of a trustee and a bankruptcy estate.
Specifically, the Debtor proposes to retain an accountant to
perform, among other tasks, these services:

     a.  Obtain and evaluate financial records;

     b.  Evaluate assets and liabilities of the Debtor and Estate;

     c.  Evaluate tax issues related to the Debtor and Estate;

     d.  Prepare tax returns;

     e.  Provide accounting and consulting services requested by
the Debtor and their counsel; and

     f.  Provide assistance as requested by the Debtor with the
financial aspects of the Plan and Disclosure Statement process.

The Accounting Firm has agreed to perform the job at the following
hourly rates:

     Partners and Principals at $305 to $495 per hour
     Managers and Directors at $225 to $375 per hour
     Staff and Senior Accountants at $85 to $275 per hour
     Para-professionals at $125 per hour

Grobstein Teeple attests that the Firm and all of its partners and
associates are disinterested persons as that term is defined by the
Bankruptcy Code, and neither the Firm nor any partners or
associates of the Firm are connected with the Debtor, its
creditors, any other party in interest, their respective attorneys,
the United States Trustee, or any person employed in the office of
the United States Trustee, nor does the Firm or its accountants
represent or hold an adverse interest with respect to the Debtor,
any creditor, or to the estate.

The firm can be reached at:

     HOWARD B. GROBSTEIN, CPA
     Grobstein Teeple LLP
     6300 Canoga Avenue, Suite 1500
     Woodland Hills, CA 91367
     Tel: (818) 532-1020
     Fax: (818) 532-1120
     Email: hgrobstein@gtllp.com
            documents@gtllp.com

                      About Rambutan Thai

Rambutan Thai, A California Corporation, owns and operates a Thai
restaurant in Los Angeles.  It filed for relief under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-16478) on June 1,
2019, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Jeffrey S. Shinbrot, APLC represents the Debtor as counsel.



RONNA'S RUFF: Seeks to Hire Quinn Buseck as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------
Ronna's Ruff Bark Trucking, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to employ
Quinn Buseck Leemhuis Toohey & Kroto, Inc., as attorney to the
Debtor.

Ronna's Ruff requires Quinn Buseck to:

   (a) provide legal advice regarding the Debtor's powers and
       duties under Chapter 11, including legal matters related
       to the operation of the Debtor's business;

   (b) prepare the Debtor's Schedule of Assets, Schedule of
       Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs;

   (c) assist in the preparation and confirmation of a Chapter 11
       plan of reorganization;

   (d) provide other legal actions, as necessary, to avoid liens,
       object to claims, enforce the automatic stay, recover
       preferences and defend motions and/or complaints against
       the Debtor;

   (e) prepare and file applications, motions, reports, etc. on
       behalf of the Debtor, including but not limited to motions
       for sale as necessary and appropriate; and

   (f) perform other legal services for the Debtor as may be
       necessary and appropriate in connection with the case.

Quinn Buseck will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.

Quinn Buseck provided pre-Petition legal services to the Debtor in
preparation for the Chapter 11 case. Quinn Buseck is holding a
pre-Petition retainer in the amount of $2,679.50.

Quinn Buseck will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Michael S. JanJanin, a partner at Quinn Buseck, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Quinn Buseck can be reached at:

     Michael S. JanJanin, Esq.
     Michael P. Kruszewski, Esq.
     2222 West Grandview Boulevard
     Erie, PA 16506-4508
     Tel: (814) 833-2222
     Fax: )814) 833-6753
     E-mail: mjanjanin@quinnfirm.com
             mkruszewski@quinnfirm.com

              About Ronna's Ruff Bark Trucking

Ronna's Ruff Bark Trucking, Inc., is a privately held company in
the skidding logs business.

Ronna's Ruff Bark Trucking, based in Shippenville, PA, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 19-11167) on Nov. 25,
2019.  In the petition signed by Erick Merryman, owner, the Debtor
was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Thomas P. Agresti is the presiding judge.
Michael S. JanJanin, Esq., at Quinn Buseck Leemhuis Toohey & Kroto,
Inc., serves as bankruptcy counsel.




ROYAL TRANSPORT EXPRESS: Hires Eric A. Liepins as its Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Royal Transport Express, LLC, sought and obtained authorization
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas to
employ Eric A. Liepins and the law firm of Eric A. Liepins, P.C.,
as counsel for the Debtor.

The Debtor believes a variety of legal matters exist as to the
assets and liabilities of the estate which require legal
assistance.

The Firm has received a retainer of $5,000 plus the filing fee.

The compensation to be paid to the Firm shall be based upon the
following hourly rates:

     Eric A. Liepins                     $275.00 per hour
     Paralegals and Legal Assistants     $30.00-50.00 per hour

The Debtor has agreed to reimburse the Firm for all reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred on the Debtor's behalf.

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2014(a), Eric A. Liepins attests that
the Firm does not presently hold or represent any interest adverse
to the interest of the Debtor or this Estate and is disinterested
within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Section 101(14) to the best of his
knowledge, information, and belief.

The firm may be reached at:

     Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
     ERIC A. LIEPINS, P.C.
     12770 Coit Road, Suite 1100
     Dallas, Texas 75251
     Tel: (972) 991-5591
     Fax: (972) 991-5788

               About Royal Transport Express

Royal Transport Express, LLC is a freight shipping and trucking
company based in Murphy, Texas.  The Debtor filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 19-43230) on
December 2, 2019.  The Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades oversees the case.

In its petition, the Debtor listed $820,800 in assets and
$1,250,676 in liabilities.  The petition was signed by Bahadur
Dhesi, Managing member.

The Debtor is represented by Eric A. Liepins, Esq., at Eric A.
Liepins P.C.



SAFE HARBOR: Court OKs $332,500 DIP Loan from Velocity Mortgage
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael B. Kaplan authorized SHC Holding, LLC to enter into a
secured financing with Velocity Mortgage Capital for up to
$332,500.  SHC Holding is an affiliated company of Safe Harbor
Construction Group.

Previously, Safe Harbor Construction Group, Inc., has sought
permission to obtain post-petition financing from SHC Holdings for
the satisfaction of a settlement with Daniel Smith and Vitoria
Simon and for the settlement of claims under the Windowrama
judgment, among others.  SHC Holdings was seeking to obtain said
financing from Velocity Mortgage for the Debtor.

Pursuant to the Court order, the settlement of Daniel Smith and
Victoria Simon judgment may be paid from the proceeds of closing,
and the judgment of Windowrama, LLC will be held in escrow pending
further application and Court order.

A copy of the order is available at https://is.gd/MSEmkb from
PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

                About Safe Harbor Construction

Safe Harbor Construction Group Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 19-24968) on Aug. 1, 2019 in Trenton, New
Jersey.  Steven J. Abelson, Esq., at ABELSON & TUESDALE, is the
Debtor's counsel.


SAVE MONEY: Seeks to Hire Merlin Law Group as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Save Money and Retain Temperature, LLC received approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire
Merlin Law Group, P.A. as its special counsel.

Merlin Law Group will provide legal services to help the Debtor
recover insurance claims.  The firm will be paid on a contingency
fee basis.

Kelly Kubiak, Esq., at Merlin Law Group, assures the court that the
firm does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Kelly L. Kubiak, Esq.
     Merlin Law Group, P.A.
     777 S. Harbour Island Blvd. Suite 950
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Office: 813-229-1000
     Email: kkubiak@MerlinLawGroup.com

               About Save Money and Retain Temperature

Save Money and Retain Temperature, LLC, is an insulation contractor
in Tampa, Fla., which specializes in roofing, siding and sheet
metal work.

Save Money and Retain Temperature sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-04090) on
April 30, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was
estimated to have assets of between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities of the same range.  Santana, Byrd & Jaap, P.A., is the
Debtor's counsel.


SCOSA PROPERTIES: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: SCOSA Properties, LLC
        175 Enterprise Pkwy.
        Boerne, TX 78006-8634

Business Description: SCOSA Properties LLC is primarily engaged
                      in renting and leasing real estate
                      properties.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 6, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas

Case No.: 20-50042

Judge: Hon. Craig A. Gargotta

Debtor's Counsel: Anthony H. Hervol, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF H. ANTHONY HERVOL
                  4414 Centerview Dr., Suite 207
                  San Antonio, TX 78228
                  Tel: (210) 522-9500
                  E-mail: hervol@sbcglobal.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Scott M. Hillje, member.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                        https://is.gd/POTfSx


SEPCO CORPORATION: To Seek Plan Confirmation March 23
-----------------------------------------------------
Sepco Corporation on Dec. 16, 2019, won approval of the Disclosure
Statement accompanying their Second Amended Plan of
Reorganization.

The Court will convene a hearing on March 23, 2020 at 9:30 a.m.
(Eastern Time) to consider confirmation of the Plan.  Ballots and
objections to confiramtion are due March 2.

On Dec. 9, 2019, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Ohio, Eastern Division, conducted a telephonic status
conference for the Second Amended Plan of Reorganization, as
Modified, and the Disclosure Statement, both of which have been
red-lined to show changes as compared to the versions.

A red-lined copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/slphckj from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Since January 1995, the Debtor has not engaged in any active
manufacturing or sales activities.  Prior to its bankruptcy filing,
the Debtor was named as a defendant in a substantial number of
personal injury and wrongful death claims allegedly based on
asbestos-containing products that the Debtor had sold.  The vast
majority of those claims allegedly arose from the Debtor's sale,
manufacture, marketing, and distribution, until approximately 1984,
of certain asbestos-containing packing and gasket products and its
sale, manufacture, marketing, and distribution, until approximately
1992, of certain asbestos-containing spiral-wound or semi-metallic
gaskets.

The Plan is jointly proposed by the Debtor, the Committee of
Asbestos Claimants, and the Future Claimants' Representative.  The
purpose of the Plan is to channel the Asbestos Personal Injury
Claims to the Asbestos Personal Injury Trust in accordance with
Section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Asbestos Personal
Injury Trust will assume liability for the Asbestos  Personal
Injury Claims and use the assets conveyed to the Asbestos Personal
Injury Trust to resolve the Asbestos Personal Injury Claims and to
compensate  eligible holders of the Asbestos Personal Injury Claims
in a fair and efficient manner.

Holders of general unsecured claims, owed $129,000, are unimpaired
under the Plan.

The Debtor is represented by:

         HARRY W. GREENFIELD
         JEFFREY C. TOOLE
         BERNSTEIN-BURKLEY, P.C.
         Fifth Third Center
         600 Superior Avenue East, Suite 1300
         Cleveland, Ohio 44114
         Telephone: (800) 693-4013
         Facsimile: (412) 456-8135
         E-mail: hgreenfield@bernsteinlaw.com
                 jtoole@bernsteinlaw.com

                   About Sepco Corporation

Aurora, Ohio-based Sepco Corporation filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ohio. Case No. 16-50058) on Jan. 14, 2016.
In the petition signed by CRO Richard J. Szekelyi, the Debtor was
estimated to have assets and liabilities ranging from $10 million
to $50 million each.

The Company has not been engaged in any active manufacturing or
sales activities since January 1995. Prior to its bankruptcy
filing, the Debtor has been named as a defendant in a substantial
number of personal injury and wrongful death claims allegedly based
on asbestos-containing products that the Debtor had sold. The vast
majority of those claims allegedly arose from the Debtor's sale
until approximately 1984 of certain asbestos-containing packing and
gasket products and its sale until approximately 1992 of certain
asbestos-containing spiral-would or semi-metallic gaskets.

Asbestos PI Claims were first brought against the Debtor beginning
in the late 1970s. Following the bankruptcies of companies that had
been major suppliers of asbestos and asbestos-containing products,
litigants increasingly pursued claims against second-and-third-tier
suppliers of products that had any asbestos content, including the
Debtor.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor has approximately 4,816 open
and pending Asbestos PI Claims. In addition, approximately 32,238
Asbestos PI Claims are technically pending against the Debtor but
are deemed inactive either as a matter of state of law (for lack of
a manifested injury, or otherwise) or because they have been
dormant.

The case is assigned to Judge Alan M. Koschik.  

Bernstein-Burkley, P.C. is the Debtor's counsel. Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC, is the notice, balloting and claims agent.  

Daniel M. McDermott, the United States Trustee for Region 9,
appointed creditors to serve on the committee of asbestos
claimants. The committee retained Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered as
Bankruptcy counsel; Brouse McDowell, A Legal Professional
Association as Ohio co-counsel; and Gilbert LLP as special
counsel.

Lawrence Fitzpatrick, the future claimants' representatives of
Sepco Corporation, retained Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP,
as bankruptcy counsel; and Black McCuskey Souers & Arbaugh Co.,
LPA, as Ohio counsel.


SMARTSCIENCE LABORATORIES: Taps GlassRatner as Forensic Accountant
------------------------------------------------------------------
Smartscience Laboratories, Inc. received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire
GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as its forensic
accountant.

GlassRatner will provide a calculation of value of Smartscience as
of Sept. 5, 2019.

Susan M. Smith, the firm's accountant, will have overall engagement
planning responsibilities. GlassRatner will charge a flat rate of
$12,500 for the services.

Ms. Smith attests that GlassRatner is "disinterested" within the
meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Susan M Smith, CPA
     GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC
     315 South Plant Avenue
     Tampa, FL 33606
     Tel: 813-440-6341

               About Smartscience Laboratories
  
Smartscience Laboratories, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-08468) on
Sept. 5, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of
between $1 million and $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge
Catherine Peek Mcewen.  The Debtor is represented by FL Legal
Group.


SPOILED SWEET DESIGNS: Seeks to Hire Wampler & Pierce as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Tennessee to hire Wampler &
Pierce, PC as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:  

     (a) advise the Debtor of its powers and duties in the
continued management of its property;

     (b) prepare legal papers;  

     (c) formulate and present a disclosure statement and
reorganization plan; and

     (d) perform all other legal services that may be necessary.

P. Preston Wilson, Esq., at Wampler & Pierce, will charge an hourly
rate of $300.

Wampler & Pierce does not represent any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached at:

     P. Preston Wilson, Esq.
     Wampler & Pierce, PC
     44 N. 2nd Street, Suite 502       
     Memphis, TN 38103        
     Tel: 901-523-1844       
     Email: preston@prestonwilsonlaw.com

                   About Spoiled Sweet Designs Inc.

Based in Germantown, Tennessee, Spoiled Sweet Designs, Inc. filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 19-28449) on Oct. 23, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. Preston
Wilson, Esq., at Wampler & Pierce, PC, is the Debtor's legal
counsel.  Judge George W. Emerson Jr. oversees the case.


SUMMIT TERMINAL: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Summit Terminal, LLC
        245 Park Ave, 39th FL
        New York, NY 10167

Business Description: Summit Terminal, LLC is engaged in
                      activities related to real estate whose
                      principal assets are located at 5104 N.
                      Ocean Blvd Myrtle Beach, SC 29572.  The
                      company previously sought bankruptcy
                      protection on July 18, 2019 (Bankr. D. N.J.
                      Case No. 19-23948).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 6, 2020

Court: United States Bankruptcy Corut
       Southern District of Carolina

Case No.: 20-00093

Debtor's Counsel: Richard A. Steadman, Jr., Esq.
                  STEADMAN LAW FIRM, P.A.
                  6296 Rivers Avenue, Suite 102
                  Charleston, SC 29406
                  Tel: 843-529-1100
                  E-mail: rsteadman@steadmanlawfirm.com
         
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Franklin I. Ogele, president.

The Debtor lists Horry County Treasurer as its sole unsecured
creditor holding a claim of $36,704.

A copy of the petition is available for free at PacerMonitor.com
at:

                       https://is.gd/K0xVoA


SUNNY OPTICS: Seeks to Hire Goe & Forsythe as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sunny Optics, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California (Santa Ana) to employ Goe &
Forsythe, LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:  

     a. assist the Debtor with respect to compliance with the
requirements of the U.S. trustee;

     b. advise the Debtor regarding matters of bankruptcy law;

     c. represent Debtor in any proceedings or hearings where its
rights under the Bankruptcy Code may be litigated or affected;

     d. conduct examinations of witnesses, claimants or adverse
parties, and prepare reports, accounts and pleadings related to the
case;

     e. assist the Debtor in negotiation, formulation and
implementation of a plan of reorganization; and

     g. appear in bankruptcy court.

Goe & Forsythe's hourly rates are:

     Partners            
     Robert P. Goe             $395
     Marc C. Forsythe          $395
     Ronald S. Hodges          $495  
   
     Senior Counsel
     Rafael R. Garcia-Salgado  $405
     Elizabeth A. LaRocque     $375
     Charity Manee             $355

     Associate
     Ryan S. Riddles           $325
     Jeffrey M. Yostanto       $295

     Legal Assistants
     Arthur E. Johnston        $195
     Kerry A. Murphy           $195
     Britney Bailey            $185

Robert Goe, Esq., a member of Goe & Forsythe, attests that his firm
is a disinterested person within the meaning of Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert P. Goe, Esq.
     Goe & Forsythe, LLP
     18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1200
     Irvine, CA 92612
     Tel: (949) 798-2460
     Fax: (949) 955-9437
     Email: rgoe@goeforlaw.com

                 About Sunny Optics Inc.

Based in Irvine, California, Sunny Optics, Inc. filed a voluntary
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-14711) on Dec. 4, 2019, listing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities. Robert P Goe, Esq., at Goe
& Forsythe, LLP is the Debtor's counsel.  Judge Catherine E. Bauer
oversees the case.


TARONIS TECHNOLOGIES: Sabby Volatility No Longer a Shareholder
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd., Sabby Management, LLC,
and Hal Mintz disclosed in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Dec. 31, 2019, they
have ceased to beneficially own shares of common stock of Taronis
Technologies, Inc.  A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is
available for free at the SEC's website at:

                       https://is.gd/0q4RgX

                    About Taronis Technologies

Clearwater, Florida-based Taronis Technologies Taronis
Technologies, Inc. (TRNX) owns a patented plasma arc technology
that enables two primary end use applications for fuel generation
and water decontamination.  The Company's fuel technology enables a
wide use of hydrocarbon feedstocks to be readily converted to
fossil fuel substitutes.  The Company is developing a wide range of
end market uses for these fuels, including replacement products for
propane, compressed natural gas and liquid natural gas.  The
Company currently markets a proprietary metal cutting fuel that is
highly competitive with acetylene.  The Company distributes its
proprietary metal cutting fuel through independent distributors in
the U.S and through its wholly owned distributors: MagneGas Welding
Supply - Southeast, LLC, MagneGas Welding Supply - South, LLC, and
MagneGas Welding Supply - West, LLC. The Company operates 22
locations across California, Texas, Louisiana, and Florida.

Taronis reported a net loss of $15.04 million in 2018 following a
net loss of $11.02 million in 2017.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, Taronis
had $47.76 million in total assets, $11.49 million in total
liabilities, and $36.27 million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, NY, the Company's auditor since 2016,
issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated  April
12, 2019, citing that the Company has incurred significant losses,
continued to have negative cash flows from its operating
activities, and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


TAYLOR VILLAS: Jana S. Whitworth Okayed as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Taylor Villas, LLC, sought and obtained permission from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ Jana
S. Whitworth of the JS Whitworth Law Firm, PLLC as an attorney for
the Debtor-In-Possession.

Taylor Villas believes the firm's employment is appropriate and
necessary to enable the Debtor to execute faithfully its duties as
Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession.  JS Whitworth will:

(a)  Provide legal advice with respect to the Debtor's rights and
duties as debtor-in-possession and continued business operations;

(b)  Assist, advise and represent the Debtor in analyzing its
capital structure, investigating the extent and validity of liens,
cash collateral stipulations or contested matters;

(c)  Assist, advise and represent the Debtor in post-petition
financing transactions;

(d)  Assist, advise and represent the Debtor in the sale of certain
assets;

(e)  Assist, advise and represent the Debtor in the formulation of
a disclosure statement and plan of reorganization, and assist the
Debtor in obtaining confirmation and consummation of a plan of
reorganization;

(f)  Assist, advise and represent the Debtor in any manner relevant
to preserving and protecting the Debtor's estate;

(g)  Investigate and prosecute preference, fraudulent transfer and
other actions arising under the Debtor's bankruptcy avoiding
powers;

(h)  Prepare on behalf the Debtor all necessary applications,
motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers;

(i)  Appear in Court and to protect the interests of the Debtor
before the Court;

(j)  Assist the Debtor in administrative matters;

(k)  Perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may be
necessary and proper in these proceedings;

(l)  Assist, advise and represent the Debtor in any litigation
matters, including, but not limited to, adversary proceedings;

(m)  Continue to assist and advise the Debtor in general corporate
and other matters related to the successful reorganization of the
Debtor; and

(n)  Provide other legal advice and services, as requested by the
Debtor, from time to time.

The firm has agreed to represent the Debtor based on time and
standard billing charges of $300.00 per hour for attorney time, and
$125.00 per hour for the bankruptcy legal assistants.

In addition, the firm will seek reimbursement for the following
expenses at the rate designated: postage, copies at $0.25 per copy,
long-distance calls at actual cost, online legal research at the
regular charge imputed to attorney, travel time at one-half the
hourly rate, and reimbursement of any other expenses paid by
Attorney in connection with this bankruptcy, including but not
limited to delivery charges and filing fees on any adversary
proceeding.

JS Whitworth attests that it represents no interest adverse to the
Debtor, or to the estate, and the firm's employment would be in the
best interest of this bankruptcy estate.

The firm may be reached at:

     Jana Smith Whitworth, Esq.
     JS WHITWORTH LAW FIRM, PLLC
     P.O. Box 2831
     McAllen, TX 78502
     Tel: (956) 371-1933
     Fax: (956) 265-1753
     E-mail: jana@jswhitworthlaw.com

                    About Taylor Villas

Taylor Villas, LLC is a privately held company in the residential
building construction business.  The Debtor filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-70474) on
December 2, 2019.  The Hon. Eduardo V. Rodriguez oversees the case.


In its petition, the Debtor disclosed $3,270,711 in assets and
$1,182,424 in liabilities.  The petition was signed by Jong Il
Shin, president.

The Debtor is represented by Jana Smith Whitworth, Esq., at JS
Whitworth Law Firm, PLLC.



THINK FINANCE: Court Confirms Second Modified First Amended Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas confirmed the Second Modified First
Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Think Finance, LLC and
debtor-affiliates, after a series of hearings to consider
confirmation of the Plan from Nov. 6, 2019, through the Plan
confirmation hearing on Nov. 25.

On July 1, 2019, the Court entered its order authorizing the
Debtors to enter into a plan term sheet.  On September 24, 2019
(after due notice and a hearing held), the Court entered the
Disclosure Statement Order:

     (i) approving the Disclosure Statement to the Debtors' second
modified first amended joint Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.
The Court held that the Disclosure Statement contained adequate
information of a kind and in sufficient detail to enable a
hypothetical investor of the relevant voting Classes under Think
Finance's plan to make an informed judgment whether to vote to
accept or reject the plan;

    (ii) establishing October 30, 2019 as both (a) the deadline to
vote to accept or reject the plan, and (b) the deadline to file and
serve objections to the Plan; and

   (iii) scheduling the plan confirmation hearing for November 6,
2019, at 9:00 a.m. (prevailing Central Time).

The disclosure statement and plan were transmitted to each creditor
entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan, pursuant to the
affidavits of service dated Oct. 3 and Oct. 11 prepared by American
Legal Claims Services, LLC, as the solicitation agent.

On October 24, 2019, the Debtors filed a supplement to the plan.  

On Nov. 4, 2019, the Debtors filed the Declaration of Jeffrey L.
Pirrung summarizing the certified results from the plan
solicitation process.

On Oct. 15, 18 and 30, 2019, declarations supporting confirmation
of the Plan were filed, including that of Joshua Rievman, Saverio
P. Mirarchi, Kristi C. Kelly, Michael S. Etkin, CoreCard Software,
Inc., Elevate Credit, Inc., Kenneth Rees and TCV Member Fund, L.P.,
TCV V, L.P., together with John Drew.

On Nov. 5, 2019, the Debtors filed the memorandum of law in support
of the plan confirmation.  Also on this date, the GPLS Secured
Parties (also in reply to the plan objections) and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors, each filed their statement in
support of the plan confirmation.  In addition, Thomas D. Graber
filed his Support of Confirmation of the Plan on Nov. 22, 2019.

During the intervening period between Nov. 6 and Nov. 25, 2019, the
Vermont Class Claimants filed a limited response to the U.S.
Trustee's objection to the plan, which response was joined by the
Virginia, California, and Florida Class Plaintiffs and by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

The Debtors filed their second plan supplement on Nov. 22, 2019.
On Nov. 25, the Court held the confirmation hearing on the Plan.

The Court, upon review of the plan-related documents, and having
heard statements of counsel in support of the confirmation of the
Plan, the objections to Plan confirmation, as well as the evidence
and testimonies proffered or otherwise provided at the confirmation
hearing, held that:

    (a) the Debtors, as proponents of the plan, have met their
burden of proving the elements of Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy
Code by a preponderance of the evidence, which is the applicable
evidentiary standard for confirmation of the plan.

    (b) the transmittal of the solicitation packages, in compliance
with the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure, the Local Rules of the Bankruptcy Court, and the
Disclosure Statement Order, was adequate and sufficient.   

    (c) adequate and sufficient notice of the confirmation hearing
and the voting deadline was given in compliance with the Bankruptcy
Code, the Bankruptcy Rules and the Disclosure Statement Order, and
no other or further notice was, is, or will be required.

    (d) votes for acceptance or rejection of the plan were
solicited in good faith, and ballots, as disclosed in the Pirrung
Declaration, were tabulated fairly, in good faith, and in a manner
consistent with the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, and the
Disclosure Statement Order.

    (e) the filing and notice of the plan supplements was good and
proper and in compliance with the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy
Rules, and the Disclosure Statement Order.

The tabulation of votes on the plan revealed that classes 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, and 8 have all accepted the plan.  Classes 1 and 2, which are
unimpaired, are conclusively presumed to have accepted the plan
under Section 1126(f) of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Court held,
therefore, that the requirements of Section 1129(a)(8) of the
Bankruptcy Code have been satisfied.

The Court found that the Plan provides for treatment of allowed
administrative claims, allowed priority tax claims, and allowed
priority non-tax claims entitled to priority pursuant to Section
507 of the Bankruptcy Code in the manner required by Section
1129(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Court held that the Plan satisfies Section 1129(a)(11) of the
Bankruptcy Code because:

    (a) the Debtors have sufficient monies and assets available and
existing on the effective date to implement the plan and make all
distributions contemplated under the plan.

    (b) the transfer of the reorganized debtors assets pursuant to
the plan is sufficient to fund the anticipated operation of the
reorganized debtors.

Moreover, evidence proffered or adduced at the confirmation Hearing
in support of feasibility of the Plan (i) is reasonable,
persuasive, credible, and accurate, and (ii) has not been
challenged or controverted by any other evidence.

The Court overruled all unresolved objections and joinders therein,
as well as reservations of rights, on the merits of the reasons set
forth on the record at the confirmation hearing.

The Court concluded that confirmation of the plan is not likely to
be followed by the liquidation or further reorganization of the
reorganized debtors.  

A copy of the confirmation order dated Dec. 2, as well as excerpts
of the confirmed plan, is available at
https://www.leagle.com/decision/inbco20191203706 from Leagle.com

Karla T. Aghedo, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, 609 Main St., Suite 4200,
Houston, TX 77002, Tyler P. Brown, Hunton & Williams, LLP, 600
Travis Street, Suite 4200, Houston, TX 77002, Steven A. Ellis,
Goodwin Procter LLP, Three Embarcadero Center 28th Floor, San
Francisco, CA 94111, Jason W. Harbour, Hunton & Williams, LLP, 600
Travis Street, Suite 4200, Houston, TX 77002, William J.
Harrington, Goodwin Procter LLP, Three Embarcadero Center 28th
Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111, Thomas M. Hefferon, Goodwin Procter
LLP, Three Embarcadero Center 28th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111,
Gregory Getty Hesse, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, 600 Travis Street,
Suite 4200, Houston, TX 77002, Andrew Kim, Goodwin Procter LLP,
Three Embarcadero Center 28th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111,
Jeremy Lateiner, Goodwin ProcterLLP, Three Embarcadero Center 28th
Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111, Jennifer B. Luz , Goodwin Procter
LLP, Three Embarcadero Center 28th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111,
Jenny K. Morris , Goodwin Procter LLP, Three Embarcadero Center
28th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111, Justin F. Paget, Riverfront
Plaza, East Tower, 951 East Byrd Street, Richmond, VA 23219, David
L. Permut, Goodwin Procter LLP, Three Embarcadero Center 28th
Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111, Matthew S. Sheldon , Goodwin
Procter, LLP, Three Embarcadero Center 28th Floor, San Francisco,
CA 94111, Joseph F. Yenouskas, Goodwin Proctor LLP, Three
Embarcadero Center 28th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111, counsel for
Debtors.

Stephen McKitt, Office of the United States Trustee, 1100 Commerce
Street, Room 976 Dallas, Texas 75242, counsel for U.S. Trustee.

Jill B. Bienstock, Cole Schotz P.C., 301 Commerce Street, Suite
1700, Fort Worth,  TX 76102, Daniel F.X. Geoghan, Cole Scholtz
P.C., 301 Commerce, Street Suite 1700, Fort Worth,  TX 76102, Gary
Howard Leibowitz , Cole Schotz P.C., 301 Commerce Street, Suite
1700, Fort Worth,  TX 76102, Cole Schotz , Ilana Volkov, Cole
Schotz P.C., 301 Commerce Street, Suite 1700, Fort Worth,  TX
76102, Irving E. Walker, Cole Schotz P.C., 301 Commerce Street,
Suite 1700, Fort Worth,  TX 76102, Michael D. Warner, Cole Schotz
P.C.., 301 Commerce Street, Suite 1700, Fort Worth,  TX 76102,
counsel for The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor
Committee.

                        About Think Finance

Think Finance, Inc. -- https://www.thinkfinance.com/ -- is a
provider of software technology, analytics, and marketing services
to financial clients in the consumer lending industry.  Think
Finance offers an end-to-end, professionally managed online lending
program.  The company's customized services allow clients to
create, develop, launch and manage their loan portfolio while
effectively serving customers.  For over 15 years, the company has
helped its clients originate more than 2 million loans enabling
them to put more than $4 billion in credit on the street.

Think Finance, LLC, along with six affiliates, sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-33964) on Oct. 23,
2017.  The Debtors' Chapter 11 cases  were jointly administered on
Oct. 27 with the entry of the order authorizing the joint
administration of their cases.  

Think Finance estimated between $100 million and $500 million in
assets and $10 million and $50 million in debt.

The Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Hunton & Williams LLP as counsel; Alvarez &
Marsal North America, LLC as financial advisor; and American Legal
Claims Services, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

On Nov. 2, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Cole Schotz P.C. is the
Committee's bankruptcy counsel.



TOWN SPORTS: Atlas Funds' Peter Walsh Owns 29.6% of Shares
-----------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13D filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, these entities and individual reported beneficial
ownership of shares of common stock of Town Sports International
Holdings, Inc. as of Dec. 31, 2019:

                                          Shares      Percent
                                       Beneficially     of
  Reporting Person                         Owned       Class
  ----------------                     ------------   -------
PW Partners Atlas Fund III LP           1,271,182       4.3%
PW Partners Atlas Fund II LP            4,300,000      14.6%
PW Partners Atlas Funds, LLC            5,571,182      18.9%
PW Partners Capital Management LLC      5,571,182      18.9%
Patrick Walsh                           8,702,499      29.6%

The aggregate percentage of Shares reported owned by each person is
based upon 29,415,948 Shares outstanding as of Jan. 3, 2020, which
is the total number of Shares outstanding based on information
provided by the Issuer.

The 1,271,182 Shares purchased by Atlas Fund III were purchased
with working capital.  The aggregate purchase price of the
1,271,182 Shares directly owned by Atlas Fund III is approximately
$5,682,164, excluding brokerage commissions.

The 4,300,000 Shares purchased by Atlas Fund II were purchased with
working capital.  The aggregate purchase price of the 4,300,000
Shares directly owned by Atlas Fund II is approximately
$6,450,000.

Other than 2,116,257 Shares (including 998,543 unvested restricted
Shares) awarded to Mr. Walsh in connection with his service as an
officer and director of the Issuer, the Shares directly owned by
Mr. Walsh were purchased with personal funds. The aggregate
purchase price of the 1,015,060 Shares purchased by Mr. Walsh is
approximately $3,037,554, excluding brokerage commissions.

On Dec. 11, 2019, Atlas Fund II entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement with HG Vora Special Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd.
pursuant to which Atlas Fund II agreed to purchase 2,800,000 Shares
from HG Vora for $1.50 per Share, subject to the closing
conditions.  The closing of the December 11 SPA is expected to be
completed on or around Jan. 3, 2020.

On Dec. 31, 2019, Atlas Fund II entered into a Stock Purchase
Agreement with HG Vora pursuant to which Atlas Fund II agreed to
purchase 1,500,000 Shares from HG Vora for $1.50 per Share, subject
to the closing conditions.  The closing of the December 31 SPA is
expected to be completed on or around Jan. 3, 2020.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at
the SEC's website at:

                       https://is.gd/ZaHe2q

                        About Town Sports

Headquartered in Elmsford, New York, Town Sports International
Holdings, Inc. -- https://www.townsportsinternational.com/ -- is a
diversified holding company with subsidiaries engaged in a number
of business and investment activities.  The Company's largest
operating subsidiary has been involved in the fitness industry
since 1973 and has grown to become owner and operator of fitness
clubs in the Northeast region of the United States.  

As of Sept. 30, 2019, Town Sports had $814.42 million in total
assets, $900.16 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $85.75 million in total stockholders'
deficit.

                           *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 21, 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its issuer credit rating on Town Sports International Holdings Inc.
to 'CCC' from 'B-'.  S&P lowered the rating to 'CCC' because Town
Sports' term loan matures in November 2020 and it believes there is
an increased risk of a default over the next 12 months.


TOWN SPORTS: HG Vora Sells Entire Stake to Atlas Fund II
--------------------------------------------------------
HG Vora Capital Management, LLC disclosed in an amended Schedule
13D filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that as of
Dec. 31, 2019, it beneficially owns 0 shares of common stock of
Town Sports International Holdings, Inc.  The amended Statement was
filed by HG Vora Capital with respect to the shares of Common Stock
owned directly by HG Vora Special Opportunities Master Fund, Ltd.
(the "Fund").

On Dec. 11, 2019, the Fund entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement
with PW Partners Atlas Fund II pursuant to which Atlas Fund II
agreed to purchase 2,800,000 Shares from the Fund for $1.50 per
Share, subject to closing conditions.  The closing of the December
11 SPA is expected to be completed on or around Jan. 3, 2020.

On Dec. 31, 2019, the Fund entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement
with Atlas Fund II pursuant to which Atlas Fund II agreed to
purchase 1,500,000 Shares from the Fund for $1.50 per Share,
subject to closing conditions.  The closing of the December 31 SPA
is expected to be completed on or around Jan. 3, 2020.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at
the SEC's website at:

                    https://is.gd/7mEvEF

                       About Town Sports

Headquartered in Elmsford, New York, Town Sports International
Holdings, Inc. -- https://www.townsportsinternational.com/ -- is a
diversified holding company with subsidiaries engaged in a number
of business and investment activities.  The Company's largest
operating subsidiary has been involved in the fitness industry
since 1973 and has grown to become owner and operator of fitness
clubs in the Northeast region of the United States.  

As of Sept. 30, 2019, Town Sports had $814.42 million in total
assets, $900.16 million in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $85.75 million in total stockholders'
deficit.

                            *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 21, 2019, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its issuer credit rating on Town Sports International Holdings Inc.
to 'CCC' from 'B-'.  S&P lowered the rating to 'CCC' because Town
Sports' term loan matures in November 2020 and it believes there is
an increased risk of a default over the next 12 months.


TRULY FIT: Court Confirms Plan of Reorganization
------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 20, 2019, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District
of Florida, Tampa Division, convened a hearing to consider the
final approval of Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan
of Reorganization of Debtor Truly Fit Studio, Inc.  On Dec. 16,
2019, Judge Michael G. Williamson ordered that:

  * The Disclosure Statement complies with 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1125 and
is, therefore, finally approved as containing adequate information
within the meaning of that section of the Bankruptcy Code.

  * The Plan is confirmed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1129.

  * The Debtor filed a ballot tabulation which reflected the
acceptance of Classes 1, 2, and 5. Therefore, the Debtor has at
least one impaired class voting in favor of the Plan.

  * A status conference will be held in on Feb. 19, 2020, at 9:30
a.m., in Courtroom "8-A", of the Sam M. Gibbons United States
Courthouse, 801 North Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33602, before
the Honorable Michael G. Williamson, United States Bankruptcy
Judge.

As reported in the TCR, the Debtor has filed a plan of
reorganization that says that each holder of an allowed unsecured
claim will receive, on account of such allowed claim, a pro rata
distribution of cash from the plan trust.  The Debtor will fund
$25,000 to a plan pool.  Creditors in the class will receive a pro
rata distribution of their claim, without interest, in 20 equal
quarterly distributions of $1,250, with payments commencing on the
start of the calendar quarter immediately following the Effective
Date of the Plan and continuing for a total of 20 consecutive
quarters.  Equity security holders will retain their ownership
interest in the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Oct. 3, 2019, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/yxcn8l9s from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

A full-text copy of the Order Confirming the Plan is available at
https://tinyurl.com/t5knerw from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About Truly Fit Studio Inc.

Truly Fit Studio Inc., a privately held company in Tampa, Fla.,
filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-05436) on June 7, 2019, listing under
$1 million in both assets and liabilities. Buddy D. Ford, P.A., is
the Debtor's legal counsel.


VALLEY ECONOMIC: Seeks to Hire Linzer Law as Special Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Valley Economic Development Center, Inc. seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to
employ Linzer Law Group, P.C. as its special real estate and
litigation counsel.

Among the Debtor's assets is its one-third membership interest in
an entity named Valley Corporate Community Center, LLC, which owns
a real property located at 5121 Van Nuys Boulevard, Sherman Oaks,
Calif.  The Debtor leases a portion of the property from VCCC.

The Debtor requires the assistance of the firm to:

     (1) strategize with the Debtor and its professionals with
respect to the VCCC membership interest;

     (2) negotiate with the other members of VCCC; and

     (3) if necessary, engage and participate in litigation
regarding the administration or disposition of the membership
interest.

Kenneth Linzer, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be primarily
responsible for providing the services, charges an hourly fee of
$625.

Mr. Linzer assures the court that the firm neither holds nor
represents any interest materially adverse to the interest of the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Kenneth A. Linzer, Esq.
     Linzer Law Group, P.C.
     12100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1090
     Los Angeles, CA  90025
     Tel: (310) 826-2627
     Fax: (310) 820-3687
     Email: klinzer@linzerlaw.com

                 About Valley Economic Development Center

Valley Economic Development Center, Inc., a certified Community
Development Financial Institution, is a California tax-exempt
non-profit corporation whose mission is to provide financing
assistance, management consulting, and training to entrepreneurs
and small business owners in and around Los Angeles County and
throughout California. Those services include business training for
start-up and fledgling small businesses as well as services to more
established existing small businesses.

Valley Economic Development Center sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-11629) on
July 2, 2019. At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated
to have assets between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities
of the same range. The case has been assigned to Judge Deborah J.
Saltzman. Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P. is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


VALLEY VIEW: Employs Johnson & Gubler as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Valley View, LLC, requests authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nevada to employ the law firm of Johnson
& Gubler, P.C. as counsel for the Debtor to represent and assist it
in carrying out its duties under the Bankruptcy Code in this
proceeding.  Matthew L. Johnson leads the legal work in this case.


The services to be rendered by the firm's professional are:

     a.  To institute, prosecute or defend any lawsuits, adversary
proceedings and/or contested matters arising out this bankruptcy
proceeding in which the Debtor may be a party;

     b.  To assist in recovering and obtaining necessary Court
approval for recovery and liquidation of estate assets, and to
assist in protecting and preserving the same where necessary;

     c.  To assist in determining the priorities and status of
claims, and filing objections thereto where necessary;

     d.  To assist in preparation of a disclosure statement and
plan of reorganization; and

     e.  To advise the Debtor and perform all other legal services
for the Debtor which may become necessary in this bankruptcy
proceeding.

The firm received a retainer of $25,000.00 to be applied toward
future billings, and an additional $1,717.00 required for the
filing fee.

The hourly rates to be charged by the firm expected to render
services are:

a) Not exceeding $425.00 per hour for attorneys; and
b) Not exceeding $175.00 per hour for paralegals.

Other charges that may be considered in an application for
compensation include, but are not limited to: a. Messenger service;
b. Postage and delivery; c. Process service and investigator
charges; d. Copy charges; e. Computer research and word processing
charges; f. Travel expenses; g. Miscellaneous expenses necessarily
incurred in connection with the scope of services to be performed.

Johnson & Gubler attests that the firm and its professional do not
hold or represent an interest adverse to the bankruptcy estate, and
are disinterested persons as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm may be reached at:

     Matthew L. Johnson, Esq.
     Russell G. Gubler, Esq.
     Ashveen S. Dhillon, Esq.
     JOHNSON & GUBLER, P.C.
     8831 West Sahara Avenue
     Las Vegas, NV 89117
     Tel: (702) 471-0065
     Fax: (702) 471-0075
     Email: mjohnson@mjohnsonlaw.com

                    About Valley View

Valley View, LLC, filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. D.
P.R. Case No. 19-17727) on December 5, 2019, and is represented by
Matthew L. Johnson, Esq., at Johnson & Gubler, P.C.  The Debtor
listed under $50,000 in assets and under $1 million in
liabilities.



VASCULAR ACCESS: Seeks Court Approval to Hire Business Consultant
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vascular Access Centers, L.P. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to hire a
business consultant and industry expert.

The Debtor proposes to employ Terry Litchfield to provide
consulting services relating to the finalization of its business
plan and to serve as an industry expert in connection with the
feasibility of the plan.

The Debtor will pay the consultant $100 per hour for her services
and $4,000 per day for court appearances.  The consultant will also
receive reimbursement for work-related expenses.

Ms. Litchfield assures the court that she is a "disinterested
person", as such term is defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Ms. Litchfield maintains an office at:

     Terry Litchfield, MPH
     1401 H Street, NW, Suite 900
     Washington, DC 20005
     Tel: 202-640-4660
     Fax: 202-637-9793

                     About Vascular Access Centers

Vascular Access Centers -- https://www.vascularaccesscenters.com --
provides comprehensive dialysis access maintenance including
thrombectomy and thrombolysis, fistulagrams, fistula maturation
procedures, vessel mapping, central venous occlusion treatment and
complete catheter services.  Its centers offer an alternative
setting for a wide spectrum of vascular interventional procedures,
including central venous access for oncology, nutritional and
medication delivery, venous insufficiency (including venous ulcer
and non-healing ulcer treatments), peripheral arterial disease
(PAD), limb salvage, uterine fibroid embolization and pain
management.

On Nov. 12, 2019, an involuntary petition was filed against
Vascular Access Centers under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case Number. 19-17117).  The petition was filed by
creditors Philadelphia Vascular Institute, LLC, Metter & Company
and Crestwood Associates, LLC.  David Smith, Esq., at Smith Kane
Holman, LLC, is the petitioner's counsel.

On Nov. 13, 2019, the Debtor consented to the relief sought under
Chapter 11.  

Judge Ashely M. Chan presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
Dilworth Paxson LLP as its legal counsel.


VECTOR LAUNCH: Seeks DIP Loan from Bridge Lender, Wins Interim OK
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Vector Launch Inc., and Garvey Spacecraft Corporation asked
permission from the Bankruptcy Court to obtain $2,500,000 of
post-petition secured super priority financing from Lockheed Martin
Corporation.  The terms of the DIP Facility require the Debtors to
complete a sale of certain of their assets in accordance with
specified milestones.

The material terms of the DIP facility are:

   * Borrowers: Vector Launch Inc. and Garvey Space Corporation

   * Lender: Lockheed Martin Corporation, and/or its affiliates who
elect to participate in the DIP Facility, or who are designated as
purchasers of the purchased assets, and any of their respective
successors and assigns

   * DIP Commitments:
     The total commitment amount consists of:
    (i) new borrowings in the aggregate principal amount of not
more than $2,000,000, of which up to $500,000 in aggregate
principal amount will be available to the Debtors on an interim
basis, and

   (ii) rolled-up loan of $500,000 in aggregate principal amount
from Lockheed Martin Corporation obtained by the Debtors prior to
the Petition Date, plus all accrued but unpaid interest, fees and
other expenses, which will become DIP Loans; plus

  (iii) $37,500 as initial commitment fee.

   * Interest Rates:  
     Loans under the DIP Facility will bear interest at a rate
equal to 15% per annum based on a 360-day year on the outstanding
principal amount of all outstanding obligations under the DIP
Facility, compounded monthly.

All interest will accrue and be paid on the maturity date provided
that, if the DIP Lender or one or more of its affiliates are the
successful bidder for the purchased assets, some or all accrued but
unpaid interest may be applied by the DIP Lender on the closing
date of the 363 Sale toward the purchase price of the purchased
assets.  All interest accruing after the maturity date shall be
payable in cash, upon demand by the DIP Lender.

   * Default Interest Rate:

     During the continuance of an event of default, any amounts
outstanding under the DIP Facility will bear interest at an
additional 2.0% per annum.

   * Maturity:  
     The period from the funding date to the earliest of:
     (i) the scheduled maturity date, which is 120 days after the
funding date;
    (ii) an Event of Default;
   (iii) the consummation of a sale of the purchased assets to
purchaser pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code or
otherwise; or
    (iv) three days from a bidder other than the purchaser being
selected as the prevailing bidder at the auction for the purchased
assets.

   * Fees:  
    (1) (i)a fee equal to 1.5% of the total commitment amount
(which shall be fully earned upon entry of the interim DIP order),
and  (ii) a fee equal to 1.5% of the total commitment mount, which
shall be fully earned upon entry of the final DIP order; and

    (2) a fee equal to 1.5% of the total commitment amount, which
shall be fully earned upon entry of the Final DIP Order and payable
to the DIP Lender in the event the Borrowers do not repay all
outstanding obligations under the DIP facility on the maturity
date.

Once earned, this DIP facility fees will accrue interest at the
non-default or default interest rate, as applicable.  All
commitment fees will be payable upon the maturity date, and the
facility extension fee will be payable upon demand; provided that
if the DIP Lender is the successful bidder for the Purchased
Assets, some or all DIP Facility Fees may be applied by the DIP
Lender on the closing date of the 363 Sale toward the purchase
price of the purchased assets.

   * Proceeds:  
     The loan proceeds will be used by the borrowers solely to:

    (i) fund expenditures during the bankruptcy cases, including
the sale process, in accordance with the Budget; and

   (ii) to pay reasonable fees and expenses of Shaun Martin of
Winter Harbor LLC to serve as borrowers' chief restructuring
officer or other similar advisors engaged for managing, protecting,
and conducting inventory of the collateral.

   * Security:
     All obligations of the borrowers under the DIP Facility will
be secured as follows:

   (i) pursuant to section 364(d)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, first
priority, priming liens on and security interests in all assets of
the Borrowers (including all intellectual property) that are
subject to validly-perfected, existing liens on the Petition Date,
including, for the avoidance of doubt, any valid, non-avoidable and
enforceable lien that is perfected subsequent to the Petition Date
as permitted by Bankruptcy Code section 546(b), such that the DIP
Lender shall have liens senior in all respects to any security
interests in the DIP Collateral; and

  (ii) pursuant to section 364(c)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code,
first-priority liens on and security interests in all assets of the
Borrowers (including, all intellectual property) that are not
subject to existing liens on the Petition Date, including, subject
to entry of the Final DIP Order, all proceeds of Chapter 5
avoidance actions, after the date of entry of the interim order.

   * Priority:
     All amounts owed by the borrowers under the DIP Facility at
all times will constitute allowed super priority administrative
expense claims in the bankruptcy cases, having priority over all
administrative expenses of the kind specified in sections
364(c)(1), 503(b) and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

   * Carve-out:
     The DIP liens will be subject to a carve-out only for payment
of:
     (i) accrued and unpaid U.S. Trustee and Bankruptcy Court fees
incurred prior to the event of default, plus

    (ii) allowed fees and expenses of professionals retained in the
bankruptcy cases (other than ordinary course professionals) that
are incurred after the occurrence of an event of default, in an
amount not to exceed $50,000, in the aggregate for all
professionals, plus

   (iii) allowed accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of
professionals retained in the bankruptcy cases that were accrued
before the occurrence of an event of default but solely to the
extent consistent with the budget, and each of the professionals
retained shall have separate line item carve-outs for their fees
and expenses as provided in the budget.

   * Milestones:  
     The borrowers shall comply with these milestones:
     (1) On or before the date that is two business days after the
Petition Date, the interim DIP order in form and substance
satisfactory to the DIP Lender shall have been entered by the
Bankruptcy Court;

     (2) On or before the date that is 25 days after the Petition
Date, the final DIP order, in form and substance satisfactory to
the DIP Lender, shall have been entered by the Bankruptcy Court;

     (3) On the Petition Date, the Borrowers shall have filed a
motion seeking entry of an order approving the sale process,
including the "stalking horse" bid, bid protections, and the terms
of the sale term sheet;

     (4) On or before the date that is three days prior to the
hearing to approve the bid procedures order, the borrowers shall
finalize a term sheet on the asset purchase agreement for the
purchased assets in form and substance acceptable to the DIP
lender;

     (5) On or before the date that is 20 days after the Petition
Date, the bid procedures order, including the bid protections,
shall have been approved by order of the Bankruptcy Court, in form
and substance acceptable to the DIP Lender.  Borrowers will
commence the sale process within one business day of entry of the
bid procedures order;

     (6) On or before the date that is 50 days after the Petition
Date, an auction (to the extent necessary) for the purchased assets
shall have occurred pursuant to the requirements  for the sale
process, including the terms of the sale term sheet;

     (7) On or before the date that is 55 days after the Petition
Date, the Bankruptcy Court shall have entered the sale approval
order approving the results of the auction and an agreement or
agreements for the sale of the purchased assets; and

     (8) The approved sale(s) shall be consummated within 15 days
of Bankruptcy Court entering the sale approval order approving such
approved sale(s).


                                            Initial Budget
The initial 13-week budget for the period from Dec. 21, 2019
through March 14, 2020 provided for $283,000 in operating
disbursements for the week-ending Dec. 21, 2019, including $158,000
in insurance costs and $31,000 in independent contractor payments.
A copy of the initial budget is available free of charge at
https://is.gd/QFFaF9  from PacerMonitor.com.

             Adequate Protection to Pre-petition Lenders

The DIP Agreement also proposed to grant the pre-petition lien
holders with adequate protection for any diminution in the value of
their respective interests in the pre-petition collateral from the
Petition Date.

   (1) The pre-petition lien holders will be granted replacement
liens subject to (i) unavoidable, duly perfected liens existing as
of the Petition Date, which liens shall retain their respective
priorities vis a vis the replacement liens granted to the
Prepetition Lien Holders; and  (ii) the priorities set forth
herein.

The replacement liens granted to the pre-petition lien holders will
be prior and senior to all liens and encumbrances of:
  (a) all other secured creditors in and to such property granted,
or arising, subsequent to the date of this Interim DIP Order,
  (b) any intercompany claim of the Debtors or any subsidiary or
affiliate of the Debtors, and
  (c) any security interest or lien that is avoided or otherwise
preserved for the benefit of the Debtors’ estates pursuant to
Bankruptcy Code section 551.

   (2) Pre-petition senior lender will be granted a lien on
intellectual property of the Debtors subject to (i) unavoidable,
duly perfected liens existing as of the Petition Date, which liens
shall retain their respective priorities vis a vis the IP Adequate
Protection Lien granted hereby to Prepetition Senior Lender; and
(ii) the priorities as set forth in the DIP Agreement.

The IP adequate protection lien granted to the Pre-petition senior
lender will be prior and senior to all liens and encumbrances of
(a) all other secured creditors in and to such property granted, or
arising, subsequent to the date of this Interim DIP Order, (b) any
intercompany claim of the Debtors or any subsidiary or affiliate of
the Debtors, and (c) any security interest or lien that is avoided
or otherwise preserved for the benefit of the Debtors' estates
pursuant to Bankruptcy Code section 551, provided, that the
super-priority claims granted to pre-petition lien holders will be
junior in all respects to the super-priority claims granted to the
DIP Lender.

No cost or expense of administration under Sections 105, 503(b),
and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code will be senior to, or pari passu
with, any superpriority claims.

          Pre-petition Lenders, Bridge Loan/Roll-up Loan

Before the Petition Date, the Debtors are parties to that certain
Plain English Growth Capital Loan and Security Agreement, dated as
of October 19, 2018 with TriplePoint Capital (the pre-petition
senior lender).  Lockheed Martin provided bridge financing to the
Debtors for $500,000 also prior to the Petition Date.  As of the
Petition Date, the Debtors were liable to the bridge lender for
$500,000, plus accrued and unpaid interest, fees, and expenses.
The Bridge Lender has offered to provide to the Debtors the DIP
facility to address the Debtors’ anticipated working capital
needs during the pendency of these Chapter 11 cases.  

A copy of the DIP motion is available at https://is.gd/Axm14x from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.
                                   
                   Interim Court Approval

Judge John T. Dorsey granted the Debtors' request on an interim
basis.  The Debtors are authorized to obtain from DIP lender up to
$500,000 of interim DIP financing from the date of closing of the
interim DIP facility until the date of entry of the final DIP
order.  The Debtors are also authorized to incur the $37,500
initial commitment fee and use the cash collateral.

The Court further ruled that:

   (a) the Debtors pay the pre-petition senior lender $7,500
monthly starting no later than Dec. 19, 2019 (and continuing each
19th of the month thereafter) to be applied to any amounts owing
under the pre-petition senior loan agreement, until satisfied or
paid in full.

   (b) the Debtors will pay up to $65,000 in full in cash the
pre-petition and post-petition reasonable and documented legal fees
which the pre-petition lenders incurred in connection with the
negotiation, documentation and administration of the pre-petition
senior loan agreement, and in connection with the Chapter 11
cases, to be paid upon the earlier of the consummation of a sale of
the Debtors' assets, and June 1, 2020.  The $65,000 limit will be
removed if the Debtors cause an uncured and un-waived event of
default under the DIP loan.

All DIP obligations of the Debtors to the DIP lenders will be due
pursuant to the terms of the DIP term sheet, on the date that is
the earliest to occur of:
   (a) the date that is 28 calendar days after the Petition Date
unless the Court shall have entered the Final DIP order on or prior
to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on such date;

   (b) subject to and effective upon entry of a final DIP order,
the date that is 61 calendar days after the Petition Date, unless
the Court shall have entered an order approving the Section 363
sale of the purchased assets on or prior to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
on such date;

   (c) the date that is 15 calendar days after entry of the sale
order unless the approved sale shall have been consummate prior
thereto; and

   (d) the occurrence of an event of default.

A copy of the interim DIP order is available at
https://is.gd/rNIDr9 from PacerMonitor.com free of charge.

Final hearing is set for January 10, 2020 at 2 p.m. Eastern Time.

             
                   About Vector Launch Inc.

Vector Launch Inc., -- https://www.vector-launch.com/ -- is a space
technology that develops rockets and satellite computing
technology.  Vector maintains engineering and software development
facilities in California and fabrication and research facilities in
Arizona.  Vector is the parent of Garvey and owns 100% of Garvey's
equity interests.  Vector, which was formed as a Delaware
corporation in 2016, is the primary operating entity and since 2016
has been the only Debtor entity with significant operations or
assets.

Vector sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
19-12670) concurrently with Garvey Spacecraft Corporation (Bankr.
D. Del. Case No. 19-12671) on December 13, 2019.  

In the petitions signed by Shaun Martin, chief restructuring
officer, Vector Launch estimated between $10 million and $50
million in assets and between $1 million and $10 million in
liabilities.  

Garvey Spacecraft estimated assets of up to $50,000 and between $1
million and $10 million in liabilities.

Judge John T. Dorsey oversees the case.

Sullivan Hazeltine Allinson LLC and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
LLP are the Debtors' counsel.  Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC,
serves as the Debtors' claims, notice agent and administrative
advisor.  




VILLAGE APOTHECARY: Silverman & Morris' Reduced Fees Okayed
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas J. Tucker of the Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Michigan granted the fee application of Silverman &
Morris, special counsel for Douglas S. Ellmann, the Chapter 7
Trustee in the bankruptcy case of The Village Apothecary.
Specifically, Judge Tucker granted, in part, Silverman & Morris'
fees in the reduced amount of $17,079.77, plus reimbursement of
expenses in the amount of $174.74.

After the Chapter 7 Trustee filed his final report in the Debtor's
case, Judge Tucker considered the fee applications filed by the
Trustee, Ellmann & Ellmann P.C., and by Silverman & Morris who
sought allowance of attorney fees and reimbursement of expenses as
follows:

    * Douglas S. Ellmann, Chapter 7 Trustee: fees of $4,821.09 and
expenses of $49.961;

    * Ellmann & Ellmann P.C., attorneys for the Trustee: fees of
$2,100.00 and expenses of $0.002;

    * Silverman & Morris, special counsel for the Trustee: fees of
$36,889.25 and expenses of $174.743.

The applicants later modified their requests because there was not
enough money in the bankruptcy estate to actually pay these fee and
expense amounts in full, and ultimately sought fees and expenses in
these reduced amounts, as reflected in the Trustee's Final Report:

    * Douglas S. Ellmann: fees of $4,441.43; expenses of $46.03,
    * Ellmann & Ellmann P.C.: ees of $1,934.63; expenses of $0.00,
    * Silverman & Morris: fees of $33,984.25; expenses of $160.98.

The Court concluded that it was necessary to hold a hearing on the
fee applications although no timely objections were filed.  "[T]he
purpose of the hearing [was] to determine whether the requested fee
amounts should be reduced, given the amount of the benefit to the
estate in this case," the Court said.

The Court entered an opinion and order on June 4, 2018.  The Court
noted that the total fees ($40,360.31) and total expenses ($207.01)
requested by the three fee applicants (plus "[b]ank service fees"
of $143.55 the Trustee had paid), amounted to $40,710.87, which if
allowed would consume all of the assets of the bankruptcy estate,
leaving nothing to be distributed to any non-administrative
creditors.  The Court also noted that other creditors have allowed
priority claims totaling $2,096.82 and allowed non-priority,
unsecured claims totaling $117,910.10.

After discussing in detail the legal basis for reducing the
applicant's fees in this situation under Section 330(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code and case law, the Court ruled to allow the expenses
requested in the fee applications in the full amounts requested,
but will allow fees only in amounts that, in the aggregate, do not
exceed $20,355.44 ($40,710.87 × 0.50).

The Court gave the fee applicants the opportunity to stipulate as
to how they wanted to allocate the aggregate fee amount among
themselves, subject to their right to appeal the Court's fee
reduction.  The applicants filed a stipulation on June 11, 2018, in
which they agreed, subject to their right to appeal, to "allocate
[the $20,355.44 fee total] as follows:

    $17,079.77 to Silverman & Morris, P.L.L.C.,
    $1,011.13 to Ellmann & Ellmann P.C., and
    $2,264.54 to Douglas S. Ellmann, Chapter 7 Trustee.

On June 12, 2018, in response to the parties' stipulation, the
Court entered fee orders in reduced amounts. Consistent with the
Court's June 4, 2018 Opinion and Order, and the stipulation filed
by the parties on June 11, 2018, the Court's orders awarded fees to
the Trustee Douglas S. Ellmann and to Ellmann & Ellmann P.C. in the
stipulated (reduced) amounts, i.e., $2,264.54 and $1,011.13
respectively.

The Court, however, made a mistake in the fee order it entered in
favor of Silverman & Morris. That order allowed fees to Silverman &
Morris in the reduced amount of $20,355.44, which was an unintended
error since the Court meant to award Silverman & Morris fees of
only $17,079.77 -- the reduced amount stipulated to by Silverman &
Morris in the June 11 Stipulation pursuant to June 4 Opinion and
Order.  That amount, when added to the amounts stipulated to and
awarded to the two other fee applicants, totals $20,355.44, which
is the aggregate fee amount set by the Court's June 4 Opinion and
Order. The Court's fee order mistakenly allowed fees in the full
aggregate amount of $20,355.44 solely for Silverman & Morris.  The
Court held that it was an obvious math error.  That error, however,
has not been corrected.

Silverman & Morris appealed its $20,355.44 fee order to the
district court arguing that it was an abuse of discretion for the
Bankruptcy Court to reduce Silverman & Morris's fees from its
requested amount of $33,984.25.  The other two fee applicants,
Trustee Douglas S. Ellmann and his firm did not appeal the Court's
orders allowing their fees in the reduced amounts, and are
therefore are not affected by the district court's appeal
decision.

On August 23, 2019, the district court entered an "Order Reversing
and Remanding the Case", which ruled that the Bankruptcy Court
erred because it "failed to apply the lodestar method when
calculating the attorney's fee award."  The district court ordered
the Bankruptcy Court to reverse its June 4, 2018 and June 12, 2018
orders and remanded the case to the bankruptcy court to determine
the lodestar amount, which the Bankruptcy Court may then adjust
based on the factors set out in Harman v. Levin, 772 F.2d 1150,
1152 (4th Cir. 1985) and adopted by the Sixth Circuit in Boddy, 950
F.2d at 338.22

The appeals court in In re Boddy, 950 F.2d 334, 338 (6th Cir.
1991), held that "the bankruptcy court must [a]t a minimum . . .
expressly calculate the lodestar amount. The lodestar amount is
calculated by 'multiplying the attorney's reasonable hourly rate by
the number of hours reasonably expended when determining the amount
of attorney's fees to award in a bankruptcy case pursuant to
Sections 329, 330 of the Bankruptcy Code.'"

In re Boddy also states that once the bankruptcy court calculates
the lodestar, it may exercise its discretion to consider other
factors such as the novelty and difficulty of the issues, the
special skills of counsel, the results obtained, and whether the
fee awarded is commensurate with fees for similar professional
services in non-bankruptcy cases in the local area.  But [i]n many
cases, these factors will be duplicative if the court first
determines the lodestar amount because the lodestar presumably
subsumes all of these factors in its analysis of the reasonable
hourly rate and the reasonable hours worked.

Applying the district court's instructions to the Silverman &
Morris fee application, the Bankruptcy Court calculates the
lodestar amount, thus: The Silverman & Morris Fee Application
sought approval of fees totaling $36,889.25, on an hourly-rate
basis, for the work of three attorneys in the firm: Thomas R.
Morris (37.45 hours at a rate of $350.00 per hour); Karin F. Avery
(62.30 hours at a rate of $310.00 per hour); and Melinda B. Oviatt
(16.25 hours at a rate of $275.00 per hour).  The Court finds that
the hourly rates are reasonable, and finds that the number of hours
expended by these attorneys is reasonable.  The Court agrees with
Silverman & Morris on these points, and no one has argued
otherwise.  Thus, the lodestar amount for the fees of Silverman &
Morris is $36,889.25.

Mindful of the district court's admonition, the Bankruptcy Court
has discretion to adjust the lodestar fee amount, after considering
other factors, including, specifically, "the results obtained," and
whether the fee "is commensurate with fees for similar professional
services in non-bankruptcy cases."  

The "results obtained" under In re Boddy were that Silverman &
Morris's work in this case, together with the work of the Trustee's
other counsel (Ellmann & Ellmann, P.C.) and the Trustee, helped
recover at most $40,710.31 for the bankruptcy estate, (the total
receipts listed in the Trustee's Final Report).  Almost 91% of that
amount would be consumed by the lodestar fee amount for Silverman &
Morris alone ($36,889.25).  All of that "results obtained" amount
would be consumed when the fees of the Trustee's other counsel and
the Trustee are considered, and creditors would get nothing at all.
Based on these factors, the Court concludes that Silverman &
Morris's lodestar fee amount should be adjusted downward,
substantially.

A copy of the opinion dated Dec. 3, 2019 is available at
https://www.leagle.com/decision/inbco20191204523 from Leagle.com.

Leon N. Mayer, Schafer and Weiner PLLC, 40950 Woodward Avenue,
Suite 100, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304, counsel for The Village
Apothecary, Inc., Debtor.  

Karin F. Avery, Silverman & Morris, P.L.L.C., 32300 Northwestern,
Suite 215, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, Thomas R. Morris, Silverman
& Morris, P.L.L.C., 32300 Northwestern, Suite 215, Farmington
Hills, MI 48334, Melinda B. Oviatt, Silverman & Morris, P.L.L.C.,
32300 Northwestern, Suite 215, Farmington Hills, MI 48334, counsel
for Douglas Ellmann, Trustee.  

Douglas S. Ellmann, Trustee, pro se.

                    About The Village Apothecary

The Village Apothecary, Inc., filed a Chapter 7 petition (Bankr.
E.D. Mich. Case No. 15-56003) on November 2, 2015, in Flint,
Michigan.  Douglas S. Ellmann was appointed as Chapter 7 trustee in
the Debtor's case.  Ellmann & Ellmann P.C., serves as attorney to
the Chapter 7 Trustee.  Silverman & Morris PLLC is special counsel
to the Chapter 7 trustee.  Judge Thomas J. Tucker presided over the
case.



WALKER ENVIRONMENTAL: Seeks to Hire Hood & Bolen as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Walker Environmental Services, Inc., seeks authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi to
Hood & Bolen, PLLC, as its attorneys.

Hood & Bolen will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under
the Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in
connection with the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Partners            $300
     Associates          $200
     Senior Paralegals   $125
     Junior Paralegals    $85

The firm's attorneys do not represent any interest adverse to the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

Hood & Bolen can be reached through:

     R. Michel Bolen , Esq.
     Hood & Bolen, PLLC
     3770 Highway 80 West
     Jackson, MS 39209
     Phone: (601)923-0788
     Email: rmb@hoodbolen.com

                     About Walker Environmental Services, Inc.

Walker Environmental Services, Inc. dba Rebel High Velocity Sewer
Services is a provider of plumbing services.

Walker Environmental Services, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No.
19-04314) on Dec. 4, 2019. The petition was signed by Andrew C.
Walker, vice-president.  At the time of filing, the company was
estimated to have assets under $50,000 and liabilities under $10
million.  The case is assigned to Judge Neil P. Olack. The company
tapped R. Michael Bolen, Esq. at HOOD & BOLEN, PLLC as counsel.


WALKER INVESTMENT: Seeks to Hire Hood & Bolen as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Walker Investment Properties, LLC, seeks authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi to
Hood & Bolen, PLLC, as its attorneys.

Hood & Bolen will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under
the Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in
connection with the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Partners            $300
     Associates          $200
     Senior Paralegals   $125
     Junior Paralegals    $85

The firm's attorneys do not represent any interest adverse to the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

Hood & Bolen can be reached through:

     R. Michel Bolen , Esq.
     Hood & Bolen, PLLC
     3770 Highway 80 West
     Jackson, MS 39209
     Phone: (601)923-0788
     Email: rmb@hoodbolen.com

                     About Walker Investment Properties, LLC

Walker Investment Properties, LLC is a privately held real estate
investment company in Madison, Mississippi.  The company sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Miss. Case No. 19-04313) on Dec. 4, 2019.  The petition was signed
by Andrew C. Walker, manager/member.  At the time of filing, the
company was estimated to have assets under $50,000 and liabilities
under $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Neil P. Olack.
The company tapped R. Michael Bolen, Esq. at HOOD & BOLEN, PLLC as
counsel.


ZACKY & SONS: Hires Pearson Realty as Broker
--------------------------------------------
Zacky & Sons Poultry, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to employ Pearson
Realty, Inc., as broker to the Debtor.

Zacky and Sons Poultry, LLC requires Pearson Realty to market and
sell the Debtors real properties located at 190 North Thorne
Avenue, Fresno, California 93706; and 18940 South Camden Avenue,
Laton, California 93242.

Pearson Realty will be paid a commission of 6% of the gross sale
price

John Stewart, president and chief executive officer of Pearson
Realty, Inc., assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

John Stewart can be reached at:

     John Stewart
     PEARSON REALTY, INC.
     7480 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 101
     Fresno, CA 93711-5729
     Tel: (559) 447-6270
     Fax: (559) 432-2938

                About Zacky & Sons Poultry

Zacky & Sons Poultry, LLC -- http://zackyfarms.com/-- is a grower,
processor, distributor, and wholesaler of poultry products. It
offers turkey and chicken products such as sausages, franks, and
sliced meat.

Zacky & Sons Poultry, LLC, based in City of Industry, CA, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-23361) on Nov.
13, 2018. In the petition signed by Lillian Zacky, managing member,
the Debtor estimated $50 million to $100 million in assets and
liabilities.

The Hon. Robert N. Kwan oversees the case.

Ron Bender, Esq., at Levene Neale Bender Yoo & Brill L.L.P., serves
as bankruptcy counsel; GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC as
financial advisor; and LKP Global Law, LLP as special employment
and labor counsel.


[*] Fundamental Sells The Clare in Chicago to LCS
-------------------------------------------------
Fundamental Advisors LP, a leading alternative asset manager
focused on municipal, public purpose and community assets, on Jan.
2, 2020, announced the sale of The Clare at Rush and Pearson, the
premier senior housing community in Chicago, to LCS, the nation's
second-largest operator of senior living communities.  Terms of the
transaction were not disclosed.

Fundamental, in partnership with seasoned senior housing experts at
Senior Care Development ("SCD"), and LCS acquired The Clare in a
bankruptcy court auction in 2012 and brought this once
highly-distressed asset to profitability, raising occupancy from
34% to 98%.  The partners worked collaboratively to successfully
execute a multi-faceted plan to renovate the community, expand the
health center and augment programs and services for residents. Life
Care Services, the management arm of parent company LCS, was
brought in to manage the community.  With these enhancements, the
continuum of care and lifestyle for residents was substantially
broadened and The Clare was repositioned to become a leading senior
housing community.

"Our team is proud to have transformed The Clare into a thriving
community, and we are confident that the facility will continue to
be in great hands under the ownership of LCS," said Laurence
Gottlieb, Chairman and CEO of Fundamental.  "The Clare underscores
Fundamental's focus on community and sustainability as well as our
differentiated approach to investing in purpose-built assets.  We
are pleased not only to have generated strong returns for our
investors but to have created a flourishing senior living community
in the heart of Chicago."

The Clare offers unparalleled amenities and services including
personalized healthcare, three on-site restaurants, a
state-of-the-art health and wellness center, art and computer
rooms, a library and a business center.  The community also
provides residents with robust social activities including music,
art, and theater, as well as lectures from The Clare's partnerships
with Loyola University, Northwestern University's Osher Lifelong
Learning Institute and the Center for Life and Learning at Fourth
Presbyterian Church.  With health and wellness as a top priority,
the community has dedicated six floors to rehabilitation, respite
care, skilled nursing, assisted living and memory care and
maintains a 5-star quality rating awarded by the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services.  

"We are thrilled to have worked with Fundamental and LCS on our
third successful CCRC together over the past decade to revitalize
The Clare, creating the vibrant community it is today," said
David Reis, CEO of SCD.  "Together with the team of professionals
at Fundamental and LCS, we have positioned The Clare for long-term
sustainable success.  The SCD team is pleased to have a continuing
role in the community's operations as well as a minority investment
moving forward."

"The Clare is a premier asset that is a natural fit with our
existing portfolio, and reinvesting in the community aligns with
our principle of keeping a long-term perspective," said Joel
Nelson, President and CEO of LCS.  "We are looking forward to
serving the residents for many years to come."

                    About Fundamental Advisors

Fundamental Advisors -- http://www.Fundamental.com/-- is an
alternative asset manager dedicated to municipal, public purpose
and community assets.  Founded in 2007, the firm is focused on
targeting control oriented investments in stressed and distressed
assets or securities, financing the development or revitalization
of public purpose or community assets, and acquiring undervalued
securities in the secondary market.  Fundamental invests through a
range of vehicles that capitalize on the growing opportunity set in
the municipal market.  

                         About LCS(R)

Established in 1971, LCS -- http://www.LCSnet.com-- is a provider
of high-quality senior lifestyle products and services.  The LCS
Family of Companies focus on development, operations management,
marketing and sales management, and strategic planning for Life
Plan Communities, and rental independent living, assisted living,
and memory care communities nationwide.  The company also provides
a full-service real estate private equity enterprise, insurance,
national purchasing consulting services and in-home care.  The
companies of LCS serve thousands of seniors across the nation.  In
the field of senior living, Experience is Everything(TM).

                  About Senior Care Development

For over 30 years SCD -- http://www.SeniorCareDevelopment.com--
has specialized in developing and investing in the full continuum
of senior housing with specific expertise and focus on high barrier
to entry life plan communities and skilled nursing facilities.  



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2020.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***