/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/191104.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, November 4, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 307

                            Headlines

1ST ADVANTAGE HOME: Seeks to Hire Caddell Reynolds as Counsel
8341 BEECHCRAFT: Nov. 26 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
929485 FLORIDA: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
A&R COMPLETE: Unsecureds Who Opt In to Recover 20% in Plan
ABC SOUTH: Unsecureds to Recover 100% With 3% Interest

ABUNDANT LIFE: Deadline to File Exit Plan Extended to Jan. 27
APODACA ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Kershaw Cook as Special Counsel
APOLLO LEARNING: Seeks to Hire Nelson M. Jones as Legal Counsel
BGC HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
BLACK EAGLE: Trucker to Pay Creditors from Continued Operations

BLUEPOINT MEDICAL: Seeks to Hire John T. Donelan as Legal Counsel
BREATHE RITE: Unsecureds to Get $500 Per Quarter for 5 Years
BUZZ TEAM: Failed to File Periodic Reports, Says UST
CAH ACQUISITION 16: Haskell Hospital Trustee Has Liquidating Plan
CAH ACQUISITION 3: Waldrep Is Litigation Trustee Under Plan

CALAIS REGIONAL: Seeks to Hire Spinglass as Financial Advisor
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Lenders Reaffirm $2.3-Bil. Borrowing Base
CENTER CITY HEALTHCARE: Needs More Time to Formulate Exit Plan
CHRIST THE CORNERSTONE: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
CITY NATIONAL BANK NJ: FDIC Named as Receiver

CITYWIDE COMMUNITY: Seeks Court Approval to Hire Accountant
COLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
COPPER STAR: Seeks to Hire Mesch Clark as Special Counsel
CORT & MEDAS: ESDC Says It's the Holder of SBA Note
DELTA HOSPICE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

DORIAN LPG: Posts $40.7 Million Net Income in Second Quarter
ENERGY FUTURE: District Court Junks NextEra's Admin Expense Claim
ENVIVA PARTNERS: Fitch Affirms BB- IDR & Alters Outlook to Stable
EPIC COMPANIES: Seeks to Hire Porter Hedges as Counsel
FFBC OPERATIONS: WestRock Seeks to Preserve its Rights in Equipment

FIREBALL REALTY: Seeks to Hire Victor W. Dahar as Attorney
FITRITION LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
FLORIDA CLEANEX: Dec. 5 Hearing on Disclosure Statement Set
FOX SUBACUTE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
FRED'S INC: Hires Epiq as Administrative Advisor

G & H LAND: Seeks to Hire Craig M. Geno as Legal Counsel
GALVESTON BAY PROPERTIES: Case Summary & Top Unsecured Creditors
GENWORTH LIFE: Fitch Lowers IFS Ratings to CCC+
GLENVIEW HEALTH: Committee Hires Bingham Greenebaum as Counsel
GRAN COLOMBIA: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable

HARBORVIEW TOWERS: District Court Affirms Clarification Order
HERITAGE HOTEL: Seeks to Hire Johnson Pope as Legal Counsel
HIGHLAND SALONS: Nov. 4 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
HUNTINGTON PROPERTY: Seeks to Hire Woodyard Realty as Broker
INNOVATIVE MATTRESS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement

JAGGED PEAK: Seeks to Hire Cowen and Company as Investment Banker
JAMES QUEZADA: District Court Affirms Ruling in Tax Dispute
KAUMANA DRIVE: Seeks to Hire R. Pumphrey as Accountant
LAFITTE LLC: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 10% Under Plan
LAKESHORE FARMS: Hearing on Plan & Disclosures on Nov. 19

LPL HOLDINGS: Moody's Rates New $1.8MM Secured Loans 'Ba1'
LRB REALTY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LUMEE LLC: Seeks to Hire CFO Solutions as Restructuring Advisor
M-TRANCONSTRUCTION: Mufthiha Sabaratnam Okayed as Ch.11 Counsel
MACHINE TECH: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

MAISON PREMIERE: Unsecureds to Recover 10% Under Plan
MARQUIS ENTERPRISES: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
MCL NURSING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
MORAN FOODS: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa3, Outlook Negative
MORIAH POWDER: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

MOTIVA PERFORMANCE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
NEAL ELECTRIC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
NEW BETHEL: Seeks to Hire Crowley Liberatore as Counsel
NEW ENGLAND MOTOR: Has Committee-Backed Liquidating Plan
NH HIGHWAY HOTEL: Seeks to Hire Ford McDonald as Attorney

NORVIEW BUILDERS: Frenzel Okayed as Real Estate Counsel
NULIFE MULHOLLAND: Seeks to Hire Robert M. Yaspan as Counsel
OAK LAKE LLC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PALM COAST CAPITAL: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PAPARDELLE 1068: May Employ Cohen Baldinger as Counsel

PAPPY'S TRUCKS: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors
PAYLESS HOLDINGS: Unsecured Creditors to Split $13.5M in Plan
PEARL GROUP: Seeks to Hire Bedi Legal as Attorney
PES HOLDINGS: Nooter Files Limited Objection to Disc. Statement
PITBULL REALTY: Seeks to Hire Victor W. Dahar as Attorney

PROTECH METAL: Seeks to Hire Dunham Hildebrand as Counsel
R & S ST. ROSE: Confirmation of 3rd Amended Plan Upheld
RANCHER'S LEGACY: Hires Platinum Management as Financial Advisor
RANCHER'S LEGACY: Seeks to Hire Foley & Mansfield as Counsel
RELIABLE REPAIRS: Seeks to Hire WH Law as Legal Counsel

RENNOVA HEALTH: Seamus Lagan Has 26.8% Stake as of Aug. 30
RETRIEVAL-MASTERS: Hires Geist Schwarz as Special Counsel
ROBERT SILLERMAN: Committee Bid to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee Okayed
ROCKET SOFTWARE: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B' ICR
RUBY'S FRANCHISE: Unsec. Creditors Will be Paid in Full Over Time

SARAR USA: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 6.69% in Plan
SAVE MONEY: Proposes Full-Payment Reorganization Plan
SEARS HOLDINGS: Dist. Court Stays Cenobia Perez Suit vs Kmart
SENECA APARTMENTS: Seeks Approval to Hire Bankruptcy Attorney
SENIOR CARE: CHI Javelin Landlords File Disclosure Objections

SHERIDAN HOLDING: Hires Jackson Walker as Co-Counsel
SKYTEC INC: Unsecureds to be Paid At Least 20% in 3 Years
SPANISH BROADCASTING: Bardin Hill Owns 7% CL-A Shares as of Oct. 31
SPORTCO HOLDINGS: Seeks Confirmation of Liquidating Plan
STEINER BROTHER: Seeks to Hire SVN Corporate as Real Estate Agent

STONEMOR PARTNERS: Axar Entities Own 61.5% of Common Units
STONEMOR PARTNERS: Oaktree Entities No Longer Own Common Units
TACALA INVESTMENT: Moody's Affirms 'B3' CFR, Outlook Stable
TRANSUNION LLC: S&P Rates New $1.75BB Term Loan B-5 'BB+'
US FINANCIAL: Rome-Edelton Buying Anne Arundel Property for $195K

VARTEK LLC: Taps TEC Polymer to Appraise Equipment
VERITY HEALTH: Delays Filing of Plan to Resolve SGM Sale Issues
VIDANGEL INC: Trustee Taps Call & Jensen as Special Counsel
VITA CRAFT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
XTL INC: Taps Buchanan Ingersoll as Special Counsel

XTL-PA INC: Committee Hires Bielli & Klauder as Counsel
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from Oct. 28 to Nov. 1, 2019

                            *********

1ST ADVANTAGE HOME: Seeks to Hire Caddell Reynolds as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
1st Advantage Home Care, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas to hire
Caddell Reynolds as its legal counsel.
   
The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

Joel Hargis, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
case, disclosed in court filings that he is "disinterested" within
the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Caddell Reynolds can be reached through:

     Joel Hargis, Esq.
     Caddell Reynolds  
     3000 Browns Lane        
     Jonesboro, AR 72401           
     Phone: (870) 336-6407        
     Email: jhargis@justicetoday.com

                   About 1st Advantage Home Care

1st Advantage Home Care, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Ark. Case No. 19-15344) on Oct.
7, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of between $50,001 and $100,000 and liabilities of between
$500,001 to $1 million.


8341 BEECHCRAFT: Nov. 26 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
A hearing to consider the approval of the Disclosure Statement of
8341 Beechcraft, L.L.C., combined with the hearing of confirmation
of its Plan of reorganization, will be held in Courtroom 3E of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, U.S. Courthouse, 6500 Cherrywood Lane,
Greenbelt, Maryland 20770, on November 26, 2019 at 10:30 am.

Nov. 21, 2019, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that the Debtor's
Property will satisfy the Allowed Claims from either a sale of the
Property or the proceeds of a refinance of the Property for an
amount not less than the Minimum Net Refinance Amount.  A copy of
the Disclosure Statement is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yyysy8f3 from Pacermonitor.co at no charge.

                     About 8341 Beechcraft

Based in Gaithersburg, Maryland, 8341 Beechcraft, L.L.C., owns a
property that consists of a 34,475 square foot brick building set
upon a 2.64-acre parcel near the Montgomery County  Airpark.  The
property is currently built out as a kosher catering facility with
multiple  kosher commercial kitchens, coolers and a large storage
area on the lower level and offices and meeting rooms on the upper
level.

8341 Beechcraft filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
18-11393) on Feb. 1, 2018.  In the petition signed by David I.
Bacharach, managing member, the Debtor was estimated to have $1
million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Hon.
Thomas J. Catliota oversees the case.  Marc E. Shach, Esq., at Coon
& Cole, LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.  No
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case.


929485 FLORIDA: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
929485 Florida Inc., according to court dockets.

                       About 929485 Florida

929485 Florida, Inc. classifies its business as single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).
  
929485 Florida sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-09424) on Oct. 3, 2019. At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets of between $1
million and $10 million and liabilities of the same range.  The
case is assigned to Judge Caryl E. Delano.  The Debtor is
represented by Edmund S. Whitson, III, Esq., at Adams and Reese,
LLP.


A&R COMPLETE: Unsecureds Who Opt In to Recover 20% in Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
A&R Complete Service, Corp., filed on Oct. 21, 2019, a Disclosure
Statement in support of its Plan of Reorganization dated Sept. 4,
2019.

The Debtor plan includes restructuring the short-term loan
obligations and the divorce obligation.  In conjunction with their
reduction of liability, Debtor plans to build revenue  by
increasing the warranty work that can be completed through hiring
new independent contractors.  The Debtor still has a significant
business tax expense, which will be paid in full from the Debtor's
business income.  The Debtor will satisfy the outstanding secured
claims against the commercial vehicles giving Debtor clear title to
the vehicles. The Debtor will restructure the loan obligations and
make distribution for 5 years to the allowed general unsecured debt
obligations according to their Plan.  The Debtor will allocate the
disposable income to meet the business obligations and reduce the
principals personal income from the business to restore the
finances to a level of profitability

Under the Plan, vendors of the Debtor, the unsecured portion of the
IRS tax claims, the unsecured portion of the Wells Fargo loans and
other general unsecured claims will be paid paid from the company
amounting to $444,361.30.  The balance of this class will be paid
from the remaining surplus operating funds in an amount to be
determined and distributed quarterly from available cash flow.
Anticipated percentage of payment is 50%.

Alternatively, the holder of any general unsecured claim may choose
to elect to receive immediate payment of 20% of their claim to be
paid within 60 days of the effective date of the confirmed plan to
the extent that Debtor has funds to make immediate payment.  Under
this election, the claim will be deemed paid in full and the hold
of the claim would be entitled to no further distributions.

The Plan Agent will make the plan payments from the revenue that is
generated from the operation of the commercial HVAC warranty
business.  The revenues are anticipated to generate approximately
$150,000 per month in the lowest cyclical income.  The Debtor
anticipates that he will continue providing HVAC warranty service
and possibly expanding into plumbing services with qualified
employees.

A black-lined copy of the solicitation version of the Disclosure
Statement dated October 21, 2019, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/yxdvyruv from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                  About A&R Complete Service

A&R Complete Service, Inc., based in Las Vegas, NV, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 19-10321) on Jan. 21, 2019.
In the petition signed by David L. Snipes III, president, the
Debtor was estimated to have $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million
to $10 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa oversees
the case.  Timothy P. Thomas, Esq., at the Law Office of Timothy
Thomas, LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


ABC SOUTH: Unsecureds to Recover 100% With 3% Interest
------------------------------------------------------
ABC South Consulting and Construction, L.L.C. filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for Eastern District of Louisiana a plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.

A creditor whose allowed claim is $700 or less or who elects to
reduce its allowed claim to 50 percent of the claim amount will
receive a single payment equal to 100 percent of its allowed claim
on, or as soon as practicable after, the Effective Date of the
Plan.

Other general unsecured creditors will be paid 100 percent of their
allowed claims with interest at the rate of 3% per annum in equal
quarterly installments within of one year after the effective date
of the Plan.  Under Sec. 1129(a)(15), if an unsecured creditor
objects to confirmation, Debtor must either pay the present value
of that unsecured claim in full or make distributions under the
plan totaling at least the value of the Debtor's net disposable
income over the greater of (a) five years or (b) the period for
which the plan provides payments.

An equity holder is a holder of an equity security or ownership
interest in the debtor and, under the Plan the equity holder shall
retain their equity interest in the Debtor.

The Debtor intends to make the payments required under the Plan
from the following sources:

   a. $10,000 of cash available on the effective date of the Plan;

   b. The refinancing of the House; And/or

   c. Additional cash from projected disposable income for the
three years following confirmation, until the claims are paid in
full.

The Debtor estimates that the Debtor will have sufficient cash on
hand on the Effective Date to pay all claims and expenses entitled
to be paid in cash on such date.

A full-text copy of the disclosure statement dated Oct. 17, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yygd6zn8 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by:

         Evan Park Howell III
         Attorney at Law
         1 Galleria Boulevard, Suite 1900
         Metairie, Louisiana 70001
         Telephone: (504) 343-4346
         Facsimile: (504) 613-6733
         E-mail: ehowell@ephlaw.com

                 About ABC South Consulting

ABC South Consulting and Construction, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No.
19-11650) on June 19, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
was estimated to have assets of less than $1 million and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  Evan Park Howell III, Esq., is
the Debtor's bankruptcy attorney.


ABUNDANT LIFE: Deadline to File Exit Plan Extended to Jan. 27
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Edward Coleman III of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Georgia extended the deadline for Abundant
Life Worship Center of Hinesville, GA, Inc. to file its Chapter 11
plan and disclosure statement to Jan. 27, 2020.  

                About Abundant Life Worship Center

Abundant Life Worship Center, a Christian church in Fleming, Ga.,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Ga. Case No. 19-40004) on Jan. 2, 2019.  The petition was
signed by Caroll A. Norwood, chief executive officer. At the time
of the filing, the Debtor disclosed assets ranging from $1 million
to $10 million and liabilities of the same range. Judge Edward J.
Coleman III is assigned to the case.
James-Bates-Brannan-Groover-LLP is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


APODACA ENTERPRISES: Seeks to Hire Kershaw Cook as Special Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
Apodaca Enterprises, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of California to hire Kershaw, Cook
& Talley, PC as its special counsel.
   
The firm will provide legal services in connection with the
Debtor's potential claims against Pacific Gas and Electric Company
related to the fire that destroyed its Kentucky Fried Chicken
franchise restaurant in Paradise, Calif.

Kershaw will be paid a contingency fee, which is 20 percent of the
amount recovered.

Kershaw and its attorneys neither hold nor represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor's bankruptcy estate, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Stuart C. Talley, Esq.
     Kershaw, Cook & Talley, PC
     341 Broadway Street, Suite 209
     Chico, CA 95928
     Phone: (916) 520-6639
     Fax: (916) 244-4829

                     About Apodaca Enterprises

Apodaca Enterprises, Inc., a company in the fast food restaurants
industry, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Calif. Case No. 19-26373) on Oct. 11, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $1,061,853 in assets and
$106,377 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Christopher
D. Jaime.  The Debtor is represented by the Law Offices of Gabriel
Liberman, APC.


APOLLO LEARNING: Seeks to Hire Nelson M. Jones as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Apollo Learning Institute, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire the Law
Office of Nelson M. Jones III as its legal counsel.
   
The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:

     (a) assist the Debtor in the resolution of all contested
claims;

     (b) assist the Debtor in the preparation and implementation of
a plan of reorganization;

     (c) advise the Debtor with regard to any litigation matters
that exist or might arise prior to confirmation of the plan;

     (d) prepare all appropriate pleadings to be filed in the
Debtor's case;

     (e) provide other legal services necessary to administer the
Debtor's case.
  
The firm's hourly rates are:

     Nelson Jones III          $400
     Phillip Yates             $300
     Mona James                $300
     Paralegal              $125 - $150
  
All Jones attorneys are "disinterested" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Nelson M. Jones III, Esq.
     Law Office of Nelson M. Jones III
     440 Louisiana Street, Suite 1575        
     Houston, TX 77002       
     Phone: (713) 236-8736       
     Fax: (713) 236-8990
     Email: njoneslawfirm@aol.com

                  About Apollo Learning Institute

Apollo Learning Institute, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 19-35819) on
Oct. 17, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $50,000.


BGC HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------
Debtor: BGC Holdings LLC - Arlington Place One
        2340 S. Arlington Heights Road, Suite 103
        Arlington Heights, IL 60005

Business Description: BGC Holdings LLC - Arlington Place One is a
                      Single Asset Real Estate debtor (as defined
                      in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The Company
                      previously sought bankrutpcy protection on
                      July 8, 2019 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-
                      19145).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Illinois (Eastern Division)

Case No.: 19-31276

Judge: Hon. LaShonda A. Hunt

Debtor's Counsel: Michael J. Greco, Esq.
                  MICHAEL J. GRECO ATTORNEY AT LAW
                  175 W Jackson Boulevard Suite 240
                  Chicago, IL 60604
                  Tel: 312 222-0599
                  Fax: 312 922-1794
                  E-mail: michaelgreco18@yahoo.com

                    - and -

                  James O. Stola, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF JAMES O STOLA
                  2633 North Bosworth
                  Chicago, IL 60614
                  Tel: 773 969-6570
                  Fax: 773 681-7087
                  E-mail: jstola@sbcglobal.net

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Samuel Bobby, member-manager.

A copy of the Debtor's list of four unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb19-31276_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb19-31276.pdf


BLACK EAGLE: Trucker to Pay Creditors from Continued Operations
---------------------------------------------------------------
Black Eagle Trans. Corp submitted a Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement.

On the Petition Date, the Debtor's largest creditor, BMO Harris
Bank, N.A., was threatening to repossess one or more of the
Debtor's commercial trucks.  In the years leading to the Petition
Date, the commercial trucking industry has been volatile because of
the fluctuations in gas prices, as well as various trade wars and
tariffs.  Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has restructured its
financial practices by ending the relationship it had with Summar
Financial for factoring and fuel card distribution services.  With
Court approval, the Debtor obtained a post-petition factoring
arrangement with Accutrac Capital ITC, Inc.  The Debtor also
obtained approval for employment and compensation of its officers,
and has endeavored to reach agreement with its secured creditors,
including agreement that the vehicles be properly titled in the
name of the Debtor going forward.

The Plan contemplates a continuation of the Debtor's business
operations.  In accordance with the Plan, the Debtor intends to
satisfy creditor claims from income earned through continued
operations of its business.  All proceeds of liquidation will be
distributed in accordance  with the priorities of the Code.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Oct. 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxrdvuwx from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                About Black Eagle Trans. Corp

Black Eagle Trans. Corp is a North Carolina corporation with its
principal place of business in Rose Hill, North Carolina.  At all
relevant times, it has been engaged in the business of commercial
trucking where it owns and dispatches a fleet of trucks and
trailers across the United States.

Black Eagle Trans. Corp. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 19-02850) on June 21, 2019.

Attorneys for the Debtor:

     GEORGE MASON OLIVER
     CIARA L. ROGERS
     The Law Offices of Oliver & Cheek, PLLC
     P.O. Box 1548
     New Bern, NC 28563
     Telephone: (252) 633-1930
     Facsimile: (252) 633-1950
     E-mail: george@olivercheek.com
     E-mail: ciara@olivercheek.com



BLUEPOINT MEDICAL: Seeks to Hire John T. Donelan as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Bluepoint Medical Associates LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to hire the
Law Office of John T. Donelan as its legal counsel.
   
The firm will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include legal advice regarding its duties
under the Bankruptcy Code, negotiations to obtain financing, and
the preparation of a plan of reorganization.

Donelan charges an hourly fee of $450.  The firm received a
retainer of $20,000.

Donelan has no connections with the Debtor or any of its creditors,
according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     John T. Donelan, Esq.
     Law Office of John T. Donelan
     125 South Royal Street
     Alexandria, VA 22314
     Tel: 703-684-7555
     Fax: 703-684-0981
     Email: donelanlaw@gmail.com

                About Bluepoint Medical Associates

Bluepoint Medical Associates LLC specializes in weight loss
management and sleep, serving the residents of Northern Virginia,
Maryland, Washington, D.C., and the surrounding area.

Bluepoint Medical Associates sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-13121) on Sept.
19, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to
have assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $10
million.  The petition was signed by LaTaunya Johnson-Weaver,
managing member.  The Hon. Klinette H. Kindred is the case judge.


BREATHE RITE: Unsecureds to Get $500 Per Quarter for 5 Years
------------------------------------------------------------
Breathe Rite Respiratory Services, Inc. filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando
Division, a plan of reorganization and a disclosure statement.

The Debtor originally scheduled a total of $104,781.37 in unsecured
claims that were non-contingent, liquidated and not disputed.
After making adjustments based on claims that have been filed as of
the date of the filing of this Plan, unsecured claims total
$112,507.02.  Mr. Aguilar, the sole shareholder, agrees to
subordinate his claims to other unsecured claims and will receive
no distribution under the Plan.

The Plan provides for the Debtor to pay a total of $10,000 to
unsecured creditors on a pro rata basis over five years with no
interest.  For administrative convenience, this amount will be paid
quarterly, with payments of $500 each starting three months after
the effective date of the Plan.  Payments will be distributed on a
pro rata basis to all timely filed, allowed unsecured claims.

The IRS filed prepetition tax liens in excess of $100,000.00. These
tax liens attached to all of the Debtor's assets and the debt
exceeds the value of the property. The IRS filed an amended secured
claim in the amount of $39,516.52. The IRS also holds a priority
unsecured claim of approximately $30,511.66. There would no funds
with which to make any distribution to general unsecured claims. By
contrast, the Debtor's Plan provides to pay unsecured creditors
$10,000.00.

Based on the projections, the Debtor believes that it will be able
to fund the Plan payments and meet all other operating expenses as
detailed in the projections.

A full-text copy of the disclosure statement dated Oct. 17, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y34sj6cd from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

The Debtor is represented by Lisa C. Cohen of Ruff & Cohen, P.A.

             About Breathe Rite Respiratory Services

Breathe Rite Respiratory Services, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-03011) on May 5,
2019, disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Lisa C. Cohen, Esq., at Ruff & Cohen, P.A., is the Debtor's
counsel.


BUZZ TEAM: Failed to File Periodic Reports, Says UST
----------------------------------------------------
The United States Trustee for Region 21 submitted an objection to
the disclosure statement and proposed plan filed by Buzz Team
Marketing LLC.

According to the U.S. Trustee:

   * The Debtor should explain why it failed to file Periodic
Financial Reports for its wholly owned subsidiaries listed on
Schedule A/B question 15).

   * The disclosure statement should indicate when the Debtor's
former business associate began his diversion of assets and when
the Debtor uncovered the defalcation.

   * The disclosure statement should explain why Class 4 tax
claims, if any, would not be paid in full rather than a percentage
of their claims.

According to U.S Trustee, the disclosure statement fails to contain
sufficient information and projections relevant to the creditors'
decision to accept or reject the proposed plan.

                   About Buzz Team Marketing

Buzz Team Marketing LLC, a marketing consultant in Riviera Beach,
Fla., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-16858) on May 23, 2019. In the
petition signed by Michael Basilicato, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $128,482 in assets and $3,086,690 in liabilities.  The
case has been assigned to Judge Mindy A. Mora.  The Debtor tapped
Julianne Frank, P.A., as its legal counsel.  

The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.


CAH ACQUISITION 16: Haskell Hospital Trustee Has Liquidating Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Trustee of CAH Acquisition Company 16, LLC, d/b/a Haskell
County Community Hospital, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of North Carolina, Greenville Division, an
amended chapter 11 plan of orderly liquidation and disclosure
statement.

Within 180 days prior to the Petition Date, the management company
for the Debtor caused the Debtor to cease paying employee wages or
premiums for employee benefits.  Additionally, EmpowerHMS and/or
iHealthcare failed to cause the Debtor to pay various county,
state, and federal taxes.

Due to the unreliability of the Debtor's records, the Trustee
cannot estimate the total extent of those liabilities as of the
Petition Date.  However, the total Priority Claims asserted against
the Debtor exceed $1,750,000.

Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim, including the
Gemino Note Unsecured Claim, will receive, in full and final
satisfaction of such Claim, on one or more GUC Distribution Dates,
a Pro Rata share of the net proceeds of the GUC Litigation Trust
Assets.  Class 4 is Impaired.

Holders of Equity Interests will retain their interests. Provided
however, the Holders of Equity Interests will not receive any
distribution under this Plan unless and until the Holders of
Allowed General Unsecured Claims have been paid in full. Class 6 is
Impaired.

This Plan provides for the disposition of substantially all the
assets and the distribution of the net proceeds thereof to Holders
of Allowed Claims, consistent with the priority provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code. This Plan will provide for the Sale of most of the
Assets at an Auction conducted pursuant to Section 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code.  This Plan also creates a mechanism for the
Litigation Trustee to pursue Claims and Causes of Action, including
Chapter 5 Actions, the D&O Claims, the Fraud Claims, and the Tort
Claims, to enable recoveries to Creditors herein.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Oct. 17, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2hf2xkt from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

               About Haskell County Community Hospital

CAH Acquisition Company 16, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability
company that owns a for-profit, 25-bed hospital 401 NW H Street,
Stigler, Oklahoma 74462.  The Hospital is classified a Critical
Access Hospital by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
It is currently owned by two members, HMC/CAH Consolidated, Inc.
and Health Acquisition Company, LLC. Prior to March 2017, the
Debtor was wholly owned by HMC/CAH.

On March 17, 2019, CAH Acquisition Company 16, LLC d/b/a Haskell
County Community Hospital, filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No.  19-01227-5).

The case is jointly administered along with six other critical
access hospitals under the Chapter 11 case of CAH Acquisition
Company #1, LLC d/b/a Washington County Hospital, Case No.
19-00730-5-JNC.

On March 15, 2019, Thomas W. Waldrep, Jr., was appointed as Chapter
11 Trustee for the Debtors.  The Trustee's own firm, WALDREP LLP,
serves as counsel in the Chapter 11 case.


CAH ACQUISITION 3: Waldrep Is Litigation Trustee Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
CAH Acquisition Company #3, LLC d/b/a Horton Community Hospital,
filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, Greenville Division, a disclosure statement for its
amended chapter 11 plan of orderly liquidation.

Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim, including the
Gemino Note Unsecured Claim, will receive, in full and final
satisfaction of such Claim, on one or more GUC Distribution Dates,
a Pro Rata share of the net proceeds of the GUC Litigation Trust
Assets. Class 4 is Impaired. Therefore, Holders of Class 4 Claims
are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

Holders of Equity Interests will retain their interests. Provided
however, the Holders of Equity Interests will not receive any
distribution under this Plan unless and until the Holders of
Allowed General Unsecured Claims have been paid in full. Class 6 is
Impaired. Therefore, Holders of Class 6 Equity Interests are
entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

This Plan provides for the disposition of substantially all the
Assets and the distribution of the net proceeds thereof to Holders
of Allowed Claims, consistent with the priority provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code.  This Plan will provide for the Sale of most of
the Assets at an Auction conducted pursuant to Section 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code.  This Plan also creates a mechanism for the
Litigation Trustee to pursue Claims and Causes of Action, including
Chapter 5 Actions, the D&O Claims, the Fraud Claims, and the Tort
Claims, to enable recoveries to Creditors herein.

The Litigation Trustee shall be Thomas W. Waldrep, Jr.  The
Litigation Trustee will pay or otherwise make distributions on
account of all Allowed Claims against the Debtor in accordance with
the terms of the Plan.

A full-text copy of the disclosure statement dated October 17,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5a4byly from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                About Horton Community Hospital

CAH Acquisition Company # 3, LLC, d/b/a Horton Community Hospital,
owns a 25 bed critical access hospital in Saint Louis, Missouri.
Services -- http://www.horton-hospital.com/-- include diagnostic
and therapeutic services, 24 hour emergency care, convenient and
specialized outpatient resources, pharmaceutical services and other
services.  

The Company previously sought bankruptcy protection on Oct. 10,
2011 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 11-44741).

The Company again sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.C.
Case No. 19-01180) on March 14, 2019.  The Debtor was estimated to
have assets of $0 to $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  The Hon. Joseph N. Callaway is the case judge.  SPILMAN
THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.

On March 15,2019, Thomas W. Waldrep, Jr., was appointed as Chapter
11 Trustee for the Debtor. The Trustee's own firm, WALDREP LLP,
serves as counsel in the Chapter 11 case.


CALAIS REGIONAL: Seeks to Hire Spinglass as Financial Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Calais Regional Hospital seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maine to hire Spinglass Management, LLC,
as its financial advisor.
   
The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:

     (a) financial and operational analysis of the Debtor;

     (b) review or development of short-term cash forecasts
necessary to manage cash requirements;

     (c) preparation of weekly variance and operational tracking
reports;

     (d) assistance in the management and enhancement of liquidity
issues;

     (e) assistance with loan applications;

     (f) assistance in the preparation of financial models and
presentations for use in decision-making and communications with
parties-in-interest;

     (g) preparation of bankruptcy schedules and statement of
financial affairs;

     (h) preparation of monthly operating reports;  

     (i) attendance at meetings with the board, senior management,
accounting personnel, and any other party as the Debtor may direct
from time to time; and

     (j) Continuing assistance with financial reporting and
financial oversight.

The hourly rates for the firm's professionals who are expected to
provide the services are:

     Mark Stickney     Senior Manager            $315
     Gary Wardwell     Chief Financial Officer   $200
     Valentyna Koval   Manager                   $140
     Stephen Collins   Senior Consultant         $125
     Dajana Derman     Junior Consultant          $80

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor has paid Spinglass the sum of
$81,660.  The firm holds a retainer of $21,909.50.

Spinglass is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Mark F. Stickney
     Spinglass Management, LLC
     16 Casco Street, 3rd Floor
     Portland, ME 04101
     Phone: 207.956.6601/207.774.7234
     Email: mstickney@spinglassllc.com

                  About Calais Regional Hospital

Based in Calais, Maine, Calais Regional Hospital --
https://www.calaishospital.org/ -- operates as a non-profit
organization offering cardiac rehabilitation, emergency, food and
nutrition, home health, inpatient care unit, laboratory, nursing,
radiology, respiratory care and stress testing, surgery, and social
services.

Calais Regional Hospital filed a Chapter 11 Petition (Bankr. D.
Maine Case No. 19-10486) on Sept. 17, 2019.  At the time of filing,
the Debtor had estimated assets and liabilities of $10 million to
$50 million.

The case is assigned to Hon. Michael A. Fagone.

The Debtor's attorneys are Sage M. Friedman, Esq., Andrew Helman,
Esq., Katherine Krakowka, Esq., Kelly McDonald, Esq., at Murray
Plumb & Murray, in Portland, Maine.


CALIFORNIA RESOURCES: Lenders Reaffirm $2.3-Bil. Borrowing Base
---------------------------------------------------------------
California Resources Corporation disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission that the lenders under the
Company's 2014 Revolving Credit Facility completed their regular
semi-annual borrowing base redetermination process and reaffirmed
the $2.3 billion borrowing base.  The lenders' aggregate commitment
also remains unchanged at $1.0 billion.

                     About California Resources

California Resources Corporation -- http://www.crc.com/-- is an
oil and natural gas exploration and production company
headquartered in Los Angeles, California.  CRC operates its
resource base exclusively within the State of California, applying
complementary and integrated infrastructure to gather, process and
market its production.

California Resources reported net income attributable to common
stock of $328 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to
a net loss attributable to common stock of $266 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company had
$7.03 billion in total assets, $610 million in total current
liabilities, $5.06 billion in long-term debt, $185 million in
deferred gain and issuance costs, $679 million in other long-term
liabilities, $777 million in redeemable noncontrolling interests,
and a $279 million total deficit.

                            *   *    *

In March 2019, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' issuer credit
rating on California Resources Corp.  The affirmation reflects
S&P's expectation that CRC will continue to support its liquidity
by balancing its spending with its cash flow, selling non-core
assets, and potential for joint ventures in 2019 as mentioned in
the Company's fourth quarter conference call.

In November 2017, Moody's Investors Service upgraded California
Resources' Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to 'Caa1' from 'Caa2' and
Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to 'Caa1-PD' from 'Caa2-PD'.
Moody's said the upgrade of CRC's CFR to 'Caa1' reflects CRC's
improved liquidity and the likelihood that it will have sufficient
liquidity to support its operations for at least the next two years
at current commodity prices.


CENTER CITY HEALTHCARE: Needs More Time to Formulate Exit Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Center City Healthcare, LLC asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to extend the period during which only the
company and its affiliates can file a Chapter 11 plan to Feb. 25,
2020, and the period to solicit acceptances for the plan to April
26, 2020.

The requested extension, if granted by the court, would permit the
companies to continue working toward achieving the important goals
established at the outset of their Chapter 11 cases, which include
the wind-down of Hahnemann University Hospital and the sale of St.
Christopher's Hospital for Children.

The companies have already developed and finalized a wind-down plan
for Hahnemann University Hospital and are currently working to
implement that plan. As for St. Christopher's Hospital, the court
has already approved the sale of the hospital, which is expected to
close on or before Dec. 13.

The companies said they intend to propose and implement a plan of
liquidation once the sale of St. Christopher's Hospital is closed
and other significant issues are addressed.

                About Center City Healthcare
              d/b/a Hahnemann University Hospital

Center City Healthcare, LLC, is a Delaware limited liability
company that operates Hahnemann University Hospital.  Its parent
company is Philadelphia Academic Health System, LLC, which is also
the parent company of St. Christopher's Healthcare, LLC and its
affiliated physician groups.

Center City Healthcare and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
19-11466) on June 30, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors
estimated assets of between $100 million and $500 million and
liabilities of the same range.

The cases are assigned to Judge Kevin Gross.

The Debtors tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP as legal counsel;
EisnerAmper LLP as restructuring advisor; SSG Advisors, LLC as
investment banker; and Omni Management Group, Inc., as claims and
noticing agent.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors on July 15, 2019.  The committee
tapped Fox Rothschild LLP as legal counsel; Sills Cummis & Gross
P.C. as co-counsel; and Berkeley Research Group, LLC as financial
advisor.



CHRIST THE CORNERSTONE: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Christ the Cornerstone Community Church
           d/b/a Cornerstone Community Church of Desoto
        1010 W. Pleasant Run Road
        Desoto, TX 75115

Business Description: Christ the Cornerstone Community Church is a

                      tax-exempt religious organization (as
                      described in 26 U.S.C. Section 501).  The
                      Debtor owns eight real estate properties
                      (consisting of vacant land and commercial
                      property) in Desoto, Texas, having an
                      aggregate current value of $4.5 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Dallas)

Case No.: 19-33649

Judge: Hon. Stacey G. Jernigan

Debtor's Counsel: Areya Holder, Esq.
                  HOLDER LAW
                  901 Main Street, Suite 5320
                  Dallas, TX 75202
                  Tel: 972-438-8800
                  Fax: 972-438-8825
                  E-mail: areya@holderlawpc.com

Total Assets: $4,494,083

Total Liabilities: $555,234

The petition was signed by Brodrick Gerald, Sr., president.

The Debtor lists Jynes Construction and Roofing, Inc. as its sole
unsecured creditor holding a claim of $11,820.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-33649.pdf


CITY NATIONAL BANK NJ: FDIC Named as Receiver
---------------------------------------------
City National Bank of New Jersey in Newark was closed Nov. 1, 2019,
by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which appointed
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver.  To
protect depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption
agreement with Industrial Bank in Washington, D.C. to assume all of
the deposits of City National.

The three branches of City National will reopen as branches of
Industrial Bank during normal business hours. Depositors of City
National will automatically become depositors of Industrial Bank.
Because deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC up to
applicable limits, customers do not need to change their banking
relationship in order to retain their deposit insurance coverage.

Customers of City National should continue to use their existing
branch until they receive notice from Industrial Bank that it has
completed systems changes to allow other Industrial Bank branches
to process their accounts as well.

Friday evening and over the weekend, depositors of City National
were able to access their money by writing checks or using ATM or
debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be
processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as
usual.

As of September 30, 2019, City National had approximately $120.6
million in total assets and $111.2 million in total deposits. In
addition to assuming all of the deposits of the failed bank,
Industrial Bank agreed to purchase essentially all of its assets.

The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund
(DIF) will be $2.5 million. Compared to other alternatives,
Industrial Bank's acquisition was the least costly resolution for
the FDIC's DIF. City National is the fourth FDIC-insured
institution to fail in the nation this year. The last bank failure
was Resolute Bank in Maumee, Ohio, on October 25. The last
FDIC-insured institution closed in New Jersey was Harvest Community
Bank in Pennsville, which closed on January 13, 2017.

The overall health of the banking system today remains strong, as
reported in the FDIC's most recent Quarterly Banking Profile. On
average, there are five bank failures each year in non-crisis
times, according to FDIC data. There have been only three years
since 1933 without a single bank failure.

Customers with questions about the transaction should call the FDIC
toll-free at 1-877-367-2719. The phone number will be operational
this evening until 9:00 p.m., Eastern Time (ET); on Saturday from
9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., ET; on Sunday from noon to 6:00 p.m., ET;
on Monday from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., ET; and thereafter from 9:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m., ET. Interested parties also can visit the FDIC's
website at
https://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/citynatl.html.

Media contact:
David Barr
202-898-6992 (office)
703-622-4790 (cell)
dbarr@fdic.gov

Congress created the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in 1933
to restore public confidence in the nation's banking system. The
FDIC insures deposits at the nation's banks and savings
associations, 5,303 as of June 30, 2019. It promotes the safety and
soundness of these institutions by identifying, monitoring and
addressing risks to which they are exposed. The FDIC receives no
federal tax dollars -- insured financial institutions fund its
operations.


CITYWIDE COMMUNITY: Seeks Court Approval to Hire Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------------
Citywide Community Counseling Services, Inc., seeks approval from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
to hire an accountant.
   
In an application filed in court, the Debtor proposes to employ
Michael Campbell, a certified public accountant, to:

     (1) provide external accounting oversight and ensure that the
financial reporting process and fiscal operations are producing
information in conformity with GAAP principles;

     (2) draft monthly operating reports and work with internal
operations to ensure accuracy of the books and records; and

     (3) oversee and assist management in the preparation of
reports to external third parties.

The accountant charges an hourly fee of $100 and has required a
retainer of $2,400.

Mr. Campbell is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

              About Citywide Community Counseling

Citywide Community Counseling Services, Inc., is a 501 c(3)
non-profit corporation that offers psychiatric, psychological, and
behavioral services.  It has a multicultural and multilingual
behavioral health program designed to provide outpatient services
within a full range of modalities.

Citywide Community Counseling Services sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 19-15164) in Philadelphia on Aug. 16,
2019.  In the petition signed by Dr. Modesta Molina, COO, the
Debtor was estimated to have assets between $100,000 and $500,000,
and liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.  Judge
Magdeline D. Coleman oversees the case.  Ciardi Ciardi & Astin,
P.C., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


COLLEGE OF NEW ROCHELLE: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 on Oct. 30, 2019, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of The College of New Rochelle.
  
The committee members are:

     (1) Dr. Susan Canning  
         575 Grand Street, Apt. E 906  
         New York, NY 10002
  
     (2) CulinArt, Inc.   
         175 Sunnyside Blvd.   
         Plainview, NY 11803   
         Attention: Thomas R. Eich
         Chief Executive Officer   
         Telephone: (516) 390-2744

     (3) Industry and Local 338 Pension Fund
         c/o Associated Administrators, LLC
         911 Ridgebrook Road
         Sparks, MD 21152   
         Attention: Alicia Cochran
         Administrative Manager   
         Telephone: (410) 683-7763
  
Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                 About the College of New Rochelle

Founded by the Ursuline Sisters in 1904, The College of New
Rochelle comprises of four schools: the school of arts and
sciences, the school of nursing and healthcare professions, the
graduate school and the school of new resources for adult learners.
CNR provided education to underprivileged and first-generation
college students at its historic home in New Rochelle, Westchester
County, N.Y.  The College expanded to operate satellite campuses at
five other locations in the Bronx, Brooklyn, Harlem and Yonkers.

The College of New Rochelle shut operations in August 2019 and
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-23694) on
Sept. 20, 2019.

In the petition signed by Mark Podgainy, interim chief
restructuring officer, the Debtor was estimated to have $50 million
to $100 million in assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Robert D. Drain is the case judge.

The Debtor tapped Cullen & Dykman, LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; and
Hogan Marren Babbo & Rose, Ltd., as regulatory counsel.  Getzler
Henrich & Associates is the restructuring advisor.  A&G Realty
Partners and B6 Real Estate Advisors are marketing the Debtor's
assets.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the claims agent.


COPPER STAR: Seeks to Hire Mesch Clark as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Copper Star Transportation, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to hire Mesch Clark
Rothschild as its special counsel.
   
The firm will provide legal services to the Debtor in connection
with the investigation being conducted by the Department of Labor
since December 2018, and with the case styled Olivarria v. Copper
Star Transportation, LLC, et al. (Case No. 19-00071) pending in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

Barney Holtzman, Esq., at Mesch Clark, disclosed in court filings
that the firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to
the Debtor's bankruptcy estate.

Mesch Clark can be reached through:

     Barney M. Holtzman, Esq.
     Mesch Clark Rothschild
     259 North Meyer Avenue
     Tucson, AZ 85701
     Phone: (520) 624-8886
     Email: bholtzman@mcrazlaw.com

                 About Copper Star Transportation
  
Copper Star Transportation LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 19-10308) on Aug.
16, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to
have assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of
between $500,001 and $1 million.  The case has been assigned to
Judge Brenda Moody Whinery.  The Debtor tapped Bryan Wayne Goodman,
Esq., at Goodman & Goodman, PLC, as bankruptcy counsel and
Mesch Clark Rothschild as special counsel.


CORT & MEDAS: ESDC Says It's the Holder of SBA Note
---------------------------------------------------
Empire State Certified Development Corporation (ESCDC) objects to
the Disclosure Statement of Debtor Cort & Medas Associates, LLC and
replies to the objection of 1414 Utica Avenue Lender LLC to the
motion of Debtor for approval of disclosure statement and related
relief and states as follows:

ESCDC opposes the Debtor's Disclosure Statement to the extent that
it fails to identify ESCDC as the current holder of the Dec. 29,
2009 Note in the principal amount of $1,132,000, from the Debtor to
ESCDC, which was assigned to the U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) on that same date.

ESCDC's counsel at Lemery Greisler advised Debtor's counsel of this
assignment and requested that the Plan and Disclosure Statement be
revised to reflect the new ownership.  The Debtor's counsel did
revise the documents, however, failed to file them by the objection
deadline.

ESCDC apologizes for any delay in its opposition but was under the
impression that its objection would be cured.  ESCDC objects to the
Plan and Disclosure Statement as they fail to identify ESCDC as the
correct holder of the loan.

ESCDC also seeks to correct some errors and misstatements found in
1414 Lender's Objection.
The objection incorrectly states that the SBA, assignor to ESCDC,
refused to waive default interest.  The SBA never charged any
default interest that it would need to waive.

ESCDC says the 1414 Lender's arguments regarding the Plan violating
the absolute priority rule are inaccurate and should be dismissed
in full.

A full-text copy of the ESDC Objection dated Oct. 17, 2019, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y4ogvkyl from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

ESCDC is represented by:

       LEMERY GREISLER LLC
       Meghan M. Breen, Esq.
       50 Beaver Street
       Albany, New York 12207
       Tel: (518) 433-8800

                 About Cort & Medas Associates

Cort & Medas Associates, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41313) on March 6,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets and liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million. The
case is assigned to Judge Carla E. Craig.  Shafferman & Feldman LLP
is the Debtor's legal counsel.


DELTA HOSPICE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Delta Hospice of California, Inc.
        14726 Ramona Avenue
        Chino, CA 91710

Business Description: Delta Hospice of California, Inc. is a
                      hospice care services provider in Chino,
                      California.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Riverside)

Case No.: 19-19750

Judge: Hon. Scott C. Clarkson

Debtor's Counsel: David A. Akintimoye, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF DAVID AKINTIMOYE
                  13800 Heacock St #D113
                  Moreno Valley, CA 92553
                  Tel: 951-656-5777
                  Fax: 951-656-2999
                  E-mail: daa225110@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Vivian Obiamalu, CEO/COO,
administrator.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb19-19750.pdf


DORIAN LPG: Posts $40.7 Million Net Income in Second Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Dorian LPG Ltd. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q reporting net income of $40.71
million on $91.62 million of total revenues for the three months
ended Sept. 30, 2019, compared to a net loss of $8.17 million on
$40.80 million of total revenues for the three months ended Sept.
30, 2018.

For the six months ended Sept. 30, 2019, the Company reported net
income of $46.78 million on $152.79 million of total revenues
compared to a net loss of $28.77 million on $68.45 million of total
revenues for the six months ended Sept. 30, 2018.

As of Sept. 30, 2019, Dorian LPG had $1.64 billion in total assets,
$687.83 million in total liabilities, and $954.37 million in total
shareholders' equity.

John C. Hadjipateras, chairman, president and chief executive
officer of the Company, commented, "In this quarter, our EBITDA was
75% higher and our realized TCE rate was 60% higher compared to our
fiscal year 2020 first quarter.  Expansion of U.S. export capacity
and increasing demand in Asia from both the domestic and petchem
sectors continue to have a positive impact on freight rates, and
our market outlook remains positive.  We now own four
scrubber-equipped ships and expect a further five within the next
three months.  I am confident that the professionalism of our
people and the quality of our ships will earn good returns for our
shareholders."

             Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2020 Results Summary

Adjusted net income amounted to $41.4 million, or $0.75 per diluted
share, for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019, compared to an
adjusted net loss of $(9.2) million, or $(0.17) per diluted share,
for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018.  Net income for the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2019 is adjusted to exclude an
unrealized loss on derivative instruments of $0.7 million.

The $50.6 million increase in adjusted net income/(loss) for the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2019, compared to the three months
ended Sept. 30, 2018, is primarily attributable (i) to an increase
of $50.8 million in revenues, (ii) professional and legal fees
related to the BW Proposal of $1.8 million that did not recur, and
(iii) a decrease of $0.9 million in interest and finance costs
partially offset by (iv) increases of $2.1 million in charter hire
expenses and $0.5 million in voyage expenses, and (v) a decrease of
$0.3 million in other income-related parties.

The TCE rate for the Company's fleet was $47,623 for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2019, a 127.1% increase from a TCE rate of
$20,973 from the same period in the prior year, primarily driven by
increased spot market rates along with a reduction of bunker
prices.  Total fleet utilization (including the utilization of the
Company's vessels deployed in the Helios Pool) decreased from 95.8%
in the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2018 to 92.9% in the quarter ended
Sept. 30, 2019.

Vessel operating expenses per day remained relatively flat at
$8,594 for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019 compared to $8,585
in the same period in the prior year.

                            Revenues

Revenues, which represent net pool revenues—related party, time
charters and other revenues earned by the Company's vessels, were
$91.6 million for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019, an
increase of $50.8 million, or 124.5%, from $40.8 million for the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2018.  The increase is primarily
attributable to an increase in average TCE rates, partially offset
by fleet utilization.  Average TCE rates increased from $20,973 for
the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018 to $47,623 for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2019, primarily as a result of higher spot
market rates during the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019 as
compared to the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018 along with a
reduction in bunker prices.  The Baltic Exchange Liquid Petroleum
Gas Index, an index published daily by the Baltic Exchange for the
spot market rate for the benchmark Ras Tanura-Chiba route
(expressed as U.S. dollars per metric ton), averaged $65.991 during
the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019 compared to an average of
$40.245 for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018. The average
price of heavy fuel oil (expressed as U.S. dollars per metric
tonnes) from Singapore and Fujairah decreased from $467 during the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2018 to $417 during the three months
ended Sept. 30, 2019.  The Company's fleet utilization decreased
from 95.8% during the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018 to 92.9%
during the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019.

                       Charter Hire Expenses

Charter hire expenses for the vessel that the Company charters in
from a third party were $2.1 million for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2019.  No such costs were incurred during the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2018.

                     Vessel Operating Expenses

Vessel operating expenses were $17.4 million during the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2019, or $8,594 per vessel per calendar day,
which is calculated by dividing vessel operating expenses by
calendar days for the relevant time-period for the vessels that
were in our fleet.  This was relatively flat when compared to the
three months ended Sept. 30, 2018 as vessel operating expenses per
vessel per calendar day increased by $9 from $8,585 for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2018 to $8,594 for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2019.

               General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $5.9 million for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2019, an increase of $0.2 million, or 3.6%,
from $5.7 million for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018.  This
increase was due to a shift in the timing of approvals in cash
bonuses to certain employees during the current period compared to
the prior year period and resulted in an increase of $0.9 million
in cash bonuses.  This increase was partially offset by reductions
of $0.4 million in stock-based compensation and $0.3 million in
other general and administrative expenses.

        Professional and Legal Fees Related to the BW Proposal

In 2018, BW LPG Limited and its affiliates made an unsolicited
proposal to acquire all of the Company's outstanding common shares
and, along with its affiliates, commenced a proxy contest to
replace three members of the Company's Board of Directors with
nominees proposed by BW.  BW's unsolicited proposal and proxy
contest were subsequently withdrawn on Oct. 8, 2018.  Professional
(including investment banking fees) and legal fees related to the
BW Proposal were $1.8 million for the three months ended Sept. 30,
2018.  No such costs were incurred during the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2019.

                      Interest and Finance Costs

Interest and finance costs amounted to $9.3 million for the three
months ended Sept. 30, 2019, a decrease of $0.9 million, or 8.4%,
from $10.2 million for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018.  The
decrease of $0.9 million during this period was due to a decrease
of $0.8 million in interest incurred on the Company's long-term
debt, primarily resulting from a decrease in average indebtedness,
and a reduction of $0.1 million in amortization of deferred
financing fees.  Average indebtedness, excluding deferred financing
fees, decreased from $756.1 million for the three months ended
Sept. 30, 2018 to $692.0 million for the three months ended Sept.
30, 2019.  As of Sept. 30, 2019, the outstanding balance of the
Company's long-term debt, net of deferred financing fees of $12.6
million, was $665.5 million.

               Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives

Unrealized loss on derivatives was approximately $0.7 million for
the three months ended Sept. 30, 2019, compared to an unrealized
gain of $1.1 million for the three months ended Sept. 30, 2018. The
$1.8 million difference is attributable to a decrease of $2.7
million in the fair value of the Company's interest rate swaps
caused by changes in forward LIBOR yield curves and reductions in
notional amounts, and is partially offset by $0.9 million of
unrealized gains on the Company's freight forward agreement
positions.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/23kGix

                        About Dorian LPG

Stamford, Connecticut-based Dorian LPG Ltd. --
http://www.dorianlpg.com/-- is a liquefied petroleum gas shipping
company and an owner and operator of modern very large gas
carriers.  Dorian LPG's fleet currently consists of twenty-three
modern VLGCs.  Dorian LPG has offices in Stamford, Connecticut,
USA; London, United Kingdom; Copenhagen, Denmark; and Athens,
Greece.

Dorian LPG reported a net loss of $50.94 million for the year ended
March 31, 2019, a net loss of $20.40 million for the year ended
March 31, 2018, and a net loss of $1.44 million for the year ended
March 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company had $1.61 billion
in total assets, $700.02 million in total liabilities, and $919.07
million in total shareholders' equity.


ENERGY FUTURE: District Court Junks NextEra's Admin Expense Claim
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned NEXTERA ENERGY, INC, Appellant, v. ELLIOTT
ASSOCIATES, L.P., ELLIOTT INTERNATIONAL, L.P., THE LIVERPOOL
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, UMB BANK, N.A., AND THE EFH PLAN ADMINISTRATOR
BOARD, Appellees, Civil Action No. 18-01253-RGA (D.Del.) is an
appeal from an order of the Bankruptcy Court denying NextEra
Energy's request for $60,000,000 in administrative expenses. The
Bankruptcy Court denied NextEra's request for two independent
reasons. First, the Bankruptcy Court granted summary judgment that
NextEra had relinquished any claim to administrative expenses by
contract. Second, the Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to dismiss,
denying NextEra's administrative expense claims under 11 U.S.C.
section 503(b)(1)(A).

NextEra asserted an administrative expense claim with respect to
its failed attempt to purchase an interest in Oncor Electric
Delivery Company from Debtors Energy Future Holdings Corporation
and Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC.  The Debtors
had marketed their roughly 80% economic interest in Oncor after
initiating Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. On July 29, 2016, the
Debtors executed the Merger Agreement with NextEra under which
NextEra would purchase Debtors' economic interest in Oncor. The
Merger Agreement provided that NextEra would pay the Debtors'
estates $9.5 billion (subsequently increased to $9.8 billion) in
consideration.

The Bankruptcy Court held that NextEra's claim for administrative
expenses under 11 U.S.C. section 503(b)(1)(A) fails because
NextEra's expenses are not considered administrative expenses under
that provision of the Bankruptcy Code.  The District Court agrees.
In relevant part, section 503(b)(1)(A) states that "administrative
expenses" are "the actual, necessary costs and expenses of
preserving the estate."  The District Court notes that the Third
Circuit in In re O'Brien Environmental Energy, Inc., 181 F.3d 527,
532-33 (3d Cir. 1999), applies a two-factor test to determine if
administrative expense treatment under the statute is appropriate.
A qualifying expense (1) "must arise from a transaction with the
debtor, and (2) the consideration supporting the claimant's right
to payment must be beneficial" to the debtor's estate.

The parties dispute as to whether the Merger Agreement is a proper
transaction to satisfy the first factor of the O'Brien test.
Regardless of the outcome of that dispute (including the
interpretation of the Merger Agreement and any administrative
expenses "addressed" in the Plan of Reorganization), NextEra cannot
meet the second factor, District Judge Richard G. Andrews says.

The second factor of the test requires that NextEra "show that the
fees were actually necessary to preserve the value of the
estate[s]." It is a "heavy burden" to demonstrate that the expenses
incurred "actual[ly] benefit[ed]" the estates and that they were
"necessary to preserve the value of the estate[s'] assets." NextEra
cannot meet this burden.

NextEra argues that it provided a benefit to the estates by working
diligently to close the merger transaction with the Debtors.
NextEra states that "had ... [it] been permitted to close" the
transaction, it would have injected approximately $9.8 billion into
the estates. But this prospective benefit to the estates did not
occur and therefore was not an "actual" benefit to the estates.

NextEra further argues that it conferred a benefit to the estates
even though the transaction did not close, relying on In re Women
First Healthcare, Inc., 332 B.R. 115 (Bankr. D. Del. 2005). NextEra
spends most of its briefing related to its section 503(b)(1)(A)
claim analogizing this case to Women First and stating that it is
similarly entitled to administrative expenses for its efforts in
trying to close the transaction. The two cases are factually
dissimilar, the District Court says. In Women First, the failed
asset sale was followed by a successful asset sale for an extra
$2.5 million. Thus, in Women First there was an actual benefit to
the estate. But even if comparison to Women First was appropriate,
NextEra does not articulate the actual, necessary benefits to the
preservation of the Debtors' estates that its efforts provided.
Instead, NextEra refers only to "benefits" broadly. Without an
actual and necessary benefit to the estates, NextEra cannot meet
the high burden of section 503(b)(1)(A).

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept. 30, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2petYab from Leagle.com.

NextEra Energy, Inc., Appellant, represented by Adam G. Landis --
landis@lrclaw.com -- Landis Rath & Cobb LLP & Matthew B. McGuire --
mcguire@lrclaw.com -- Landis Rath & Cobb LLP.

Elliott Associates, L.P., Elliott International, L.P., Liverpool
Limited Partnership & UMB Bank, N.A., Appellees, represented by
Scott D. Cousins -- scousins@bayardlaw.com -- Bayard, P.A., Erin R.
Fay , Bayard, P.A., Evan Thomas Miller -- emiller@bayardlaw.com --
Bayard, P.A. & Gregg Mattisen Galardi --
Gregg.Galardi@ropesgray.com -- Ropes & Gray LLP.

EFH Plan Administrator Board, Appellee, represented by Mark David
Collins -- collins@rlf.com -- Richards, Layton & Finger, PA, Aparna
Yenamandra -- aparna.yenamandra@kirkland.com -- KIRKLAND & ELLIS,
LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel J. DeFranceschi -- defranceschi@rlf.com
-- Richards, Layton & Finger, PA & Jason Michael Madron --
madron@rlf.com -- Richards, Layton & Finger, PA.

                       About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas. Oncor, an
80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largest
regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas. The
Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases were assigned to Judge Christopher S. Sontchi
(CSS).

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion. The Debtors had $42
billion of funded indebtedness as of the bankruptcy filing.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor, and
Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring Agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor. The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor. Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, was represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

On May 13, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of TCEH Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases. The TCEH
Committee was composed of (a) the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation; (b) HCL America, Inc.; (c) BNY, as Indenture Trustee
under the EFCH 2037 Notes due 2037 and the PCRBs; (d) LDTC, as
Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Unsecured Notes; (e) Holt Texas
LTD, d/b/a Holt Cat; (f) ADA Carbon Solutions (Red River); and (g)
Wilmington Savings, as Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Second Lien
Notes. The TCEH Committee retained Morrison & Foerster LLP as
counsel; Polsinelli PC as co-counsel and conflicts counsel; Lazard
Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; FTI Consulting, Inc., as
financial advisor; and Charles River Associates as an energy
consultant.

On Oct. 27, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors representing the interests of the unsecured
creditors for EFH, EFIH, EFIH Finance, and EECI, Inc.  The EFH/EFIH
Committee was composed of (a) American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, LLC; (b) Brown & Zhou, LLC c/o Belleair Aviation, LLC;
(c)
Peter Tinkham; (d) Shirley Fenicle, as successor-in-interest to the
Estate of George Fenicle; and (e) David William Fahy. The EFH/EFIH
Committee retained Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhodes, LLP, as
co-counsel and conflicts counsel; AlixPartners, LLP, as
restructuring advisor; Sullivan & Cromwell LLC as counsel;
Guggenheim Securities as investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC as noticing agent for both the TCEH Committee and
the EFH/EFIH Committee.

Given the size and complexity of the Chapter 11 Cases, the U.S.
Trustee proposed, and the Debtors and the TCEH Committee agreed, to
recommend that the Bankruptcy Court appoint a committee to, among
other things, review and report as appropriate on fee applications
and statements submitted by the professionals paid for by the
Debtors' Estates. The Fee Committee was comprised of four members:
(a) one member appointed by and representative of the Debtors
(Cecily Gooch, Vice President and Special Counsel for
Restructuring, Energy Future Holdings); (b) one member appointed by
and representative of the TCEH Creditors' Committee (Peter Kravitz,
Principal and General Counsel, Province Capital); (c) one member
appointed by and representative of the U.S. Trustee (Richard L.
Schepacarter, Trial Attorney, Office of the United States Trustee);
and (d) one independent member (Richard Gitlin, of Gitlin and
Company, LLC). The Fee Committee retained Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., as
counsel; and Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A., as co-counsel.

On Aug. 29, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit Plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.
(the "T-Side Debtors"). The Plan became effective on Oct. 3, 2016.

On Aug. 20, 2017, Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE) announced an agreement
to acquire Energy Future Holdings, the indirect owner of 80% of
Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, operator of the largest
electric transmission and distribution system in Texas. Under the
agreement, Sempra Energy will pay approximately $9.45 billion in
cash to acquire Energy Future and its ownership in Oncor, while
taking a major step forward in resolving Energy Future's
long-running bankruptcy case. The enterprise value of the
transaction is approximately $18.8 billion, including the
assumption of Oncor's debt.

On Nov. 3, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order closing the
Chapter 11 cases of 40 affiliate debtors. The claims asserted
against, and interests asserted in, the Closing Cases are
transferred to the lead case of Texas Competitive Electric
Holdings
Company LLC, Case No. 14-10978. A list of the Closing Cases is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/EnergyFuture_decreeclosing40.pdf   


ENVIVA PARTNERS: Fitch Affirms BB- IDR & Alters Outlook to Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings affirmed Enviva Partners LP's Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating at 'BB-' and senior unsecured rating at 'BB-'/'RR4'.
The Rating Outlook is revised to Stable from Positive.

The Stable Outlook revision reflects EVA's heightened leverage
driven by the planned future asset dropdowns from its sponsor in
the near term. Fitch previously expected EVA's leverage (debt/adj.
EBITDA) to be below 3.5x commencing 2020 accounting for one
dropdown transaction taken place in 2020 and no major funding needs
through 2021. Fitch now forecasts EVA's leverage 3.8x-4.0x through
2021 in its rating case assuming successful execution of dropdown
transactions at a 50/50 debt and equity funding mix. Fitch notes
that the dropdown transactions will also require larger funding
needs from both the debt and equity capital markets relative to
previous transactions. Self-funding using internally generated
cashflow has been a key emphasis in the midstream energy space, as
equity issuance to finance capex or projects generally has not been
receptive by investors in the recent year.

The ratings highlight EVA's future volume ramp and stable cash flow
growth from the existing contracts as well as the planned assets
dropdown underpinned by long-term take-or pay contracts, which will
provide accretive earnings in 2021. Moreover, the ratings also
highlight EVA's existing long-term take-or-pay contract profile
with a weighted average remaining term of approximately 10.4 years
and contracted revenue backlog of approximately $9.5 billion,
increased customer diversification, and supportive regulatory
environment.

The ratings also consider Fitch's concerns regarding EVA's limited
size and scale with annual EBITDA expected to be less than $300
million in the near term. Fitch generally believes that master
limited partnerships (MLP) operating in niche markets like EVA
could be disadvantaged in accessing capital market debt and equity
when needed relative to larger companies with a greater breadth of
operations. However, there is a clear visibility of significant
growth for EVA upon the successful execution of future dropdowns in
the near term.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Elevated Leverage through 2021: Fitch forecasts EVA's leverage to
be 3.8x-4.0x through 2021, following the dropdown transactions that
are planned to take place in 2020 and 2021 under the assumption of
50/50 mix of debt and equity funding. Fitch previously projected
EVA's leverage to be above 4.0x in 2019, but improves below 3.5x
starting in 2020 accounting for one dropdown transaction in 2020.
Fitch highlights that the planned dropdowns will also require
larger funding needs from both the debt and equity capital markets
relative to previous transactions and Fitch's expectation.
Self-funding has been a key emphasis in the midstream energy space,
as equity issuance to finance capex or projects generally has not
been receptive by investors in the past year.

While Fitch acknowledges that these transactions will elevate
leverage close to 4.0x in the near term, Fitch views that these
dropdown assets are strong assets underpinned by take-or-pay
contracts that will boost EVA's production volume and cash flow in
the longer term. Similar to the previous dropdowns such as the
Hamlet plant, EVA is mitigated from construction risk as the
planned dropdown assets are constructed at the joint venture that
is formed between EVA's sponsor Enviva Holdings, LP and John
Hancock Life Insurance and sold to EVA through dropdown
transactions.

Volume Growth under Long-Term Contracts: EVA has a weighted average
remaining term of approximately 10 years and contracted revenue
backlog of approximately $6.5 billion for its overall contract
portfolio as of 2Q19. These contracts are primarily take-or-pay
contracts with a fixed price for the entire term of the contract
subject to annual inflation-based adjustment and price escalation,
which offer some downside protection in raw materials and shipping
cost. While most of EVA's production ramp is primarily driven by
its long-term take or pay contracts backlog, Fitch notes that EVA
also has some volumetric exposure with certain counterparties
through non-offtake contracts. A slower than expected growth from
those customers can be detrimental to EVA's projected cashflow.

During 2019, EVA also further increased its contract backlog for
the Asian market by announcing that the company and its sponsors
entered six new take-or-pay contracts with major Japanese
counterparties customers totalling more than 1 million metric tons
per year (MTPY) commencing between 2022 and 2024. Previously in
2018, EVA also announced that the company and its sponsors entered
into eight new contracts with four Japanese counterparties that
will supply more than 700,000 MTPY of wood pellets to Japan
commencing in 2021 and 2022.

While these newly signed contracts will continue to grow EVA's
robust contract backlog, Fitch notes that certain EVA's contracts
provide the customer with a right of termination for various events
of convenience or changes in law or policy. Fitch acknowledges that
there has been no termination of contracts in the past and does not
expect any early termination from EVA's counterparties in its
rating case. Additionally, some of the EVA's contracts are also
protected by early termination payments.

Increased Customer Diversification: Fitch notes that EVA will
continue to diversify its customer exposure with new contracts
commencing in 2020. In 2018, EVA generated approximately 90% of its
revenue from three major customers: Drax Power Limited (Drax Group
Holdings Ltd; BB+/Stable), Orsted Bioenergy & Thermal Power A/S
(Orsted; BBB+/Stable), and Lynemouth Power Limited (NR). Fitch
expects EVA's customer diversity to increase in 2020 with seven
customers accounting for more than approximately 90% of its
revenue. MGT Teesside Limited (NR), a greenfield biomass plant in
the UK, is expected to be the second largest customer of EVA.
Customer diversification will further increase for EVA as some of
the signed contracts in the Asian market commences in 2021.

Additionally, Fitch believes that the level of counterparty risk
for EVA is mainly reflected by the economic incentives such as
government subsidies that allow EVA's customers to operate their
biomass plants using wood pellets until the end of their contracts
with EVA. For instance, Drax currently receives government
subsidies to generate power on biomass until 2027 and has converted
four coal-fired plants into biomass plants. EVA is one of the
several wood pellets suppliers for these three biomass plants.
Orsted, the largest power producer in Denmark, has converted its
Asnaes coal power plant to Biomass plant under state-aid approval
from the European Commission. Lynemouth Power Limited is also a
coal-fired power plant that was converted into a biomass plant.

Regulatory Environment Remains Supportive: The regulatory
environment in the jurisdictions that EVA serves, in Fitch's view,
should remain fundamentally favorable for the company and the
biomass industry in the near term. EVA's major customers are
European utilities and power generators counterparties that are
subjected to the EU and UK environmental laws, which aim to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions for the power sector and meet specific
carbon-reduction goals through mandating an increase in renewable
energy usage. To achieve the mandate, the government offers
incentives for renewable energy projects, which include subsidizing
and funding coal-fired power generation companies such as EVA's top
customers to co-fire biomass in their coal plants and/or fully
convert their coal plants to biomass plants. Moreover, the Japanese
market has environmental frameworks in place that demonstrate
support for increased use of renewable power generation in the
future.

Limited Size and Scale: EVA exhibits a small scale of operation
with expected annual EBITDA less than $300 million in the near
term. Given its limited operational and business profile, EVA has a
higher exposure to the financial effect of negative industry trends
and events relative to larger companies with a greater breadth of
operations. Larger companies also have a demonstrated advantage in
efficiently accessing debt and equity capital markets to fund
growth. Fitch generally believes that MLPs operating in niche
markets like EVA could also be disadvantaged in accessing capital
market debt and equity when needed. However, there is clear
visibility of significant growth for EVA upon the successful
execution of future dropdowns in the near term.

Recontracting Risk in the Long Run: EVA does not face any
significant recontracting risk for its top customers in the near
future, given the weighted average duration of the contracts.
However, Fitch recognizes this risk, though not an immediate credit
concern will be largely affected by external factors including the
availability of government subsidies for producers at the end of
those contracts' lives, as well as the competitive landscape of the
market. However, Fitch also believes that some of the negative
financial impact resulting from the recontracting risk can be
partially offset by EVA's existing and future expansion efforts
into the Japanese market.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

EVA is a master limited partnership (MLP) that supplies
utility-grade wood pellets to major power generators across the
globe. EVA's cash flow is mainly supported by long-term take-or-pay
contracts with utilities and power generators that are currently
subsidized by their local government to produce electricity using
renewable energy sources such as biomass. There are limited
publicly traded comparable companies for EVA given the size of the
biomass sector as well as the competitive landscape. EVA exhibits
much smaller scale of operations with expected annual EBITDA less
than $300 million in the near term. While Fitch generally views
midstream entities with annual EBITDA of less than $300 million to
be consistent with 'B' category, EVA's 'BB-' ratings are reflective
of its superior leverage level of below 4.0x, long-term take-or-pay
contract profile, and a supportive regulatory environment for the
biomass industry.

Given the somewhat fragmented wood pellets market that EVA operates
in, Sunoco LP (BB/Stable) presents as a great comparable for the
issuer. Sunoco operates in a highly fragmented, competitive
wholesale motor fuel sector. Similar to EVA, Sunoco also has
15-year take-or-pay fuel supply agreement with a 7-Eleven
subsidiary under which Sunoco will supply approximately 2.2 billion
gallons of fuel annually. While EVA has a lower leverage relative
to Sunoco's 4.5x -4.7x leverage, EVA is one-third the size of
Sunoco. Additionally, Fitch also does not expect Sunoco to have
major funding needs in the near term.

Another high yield MLP that operates in a niche market similar to
EVA is NGL Energy Partners (NGL; B/Stable). With retail propane
divested, NGL now intends to focus its capital on water solutions
and crude oil logistics. NGL would like crude logistics to account
for 35% of EBITDA, water solutions to account for 35%, refined
products/renewables 10% to 15%, and liquids 15% to 20%. Water
services remains a growing, fragmented sector within the midstream
space, somewhat resembling the biomass market. Relative to EVA, NGL
is also more diversified in its business lines and more than
doubles the size of EVA. EVA exhibits superior leverage metrics and
a more stable cashflow profile, in Fitch's view. Fitch projects
NGL's FY20 leverage to be in the mid to high 5x range.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Revenue and EBITDA growth driven by growing wood pellet export
volumes as well as annual inflation and price adjustment under
existing and new contracts; accretive cash flow from future
dropdown transactions;

Future dropdowns are assumed in forecast periods consistent with
historical 50/50 mix of equity and debt funding to maintain
leverage below 4.0x for 2020 and 2021;

Capex aligns with management's forecast;

Regulatory environment remains supportive for the biomass industry
in the jurisdiction that EVA's customers operate in;

Moderate growth in unit distribution in forecast periods while
maintaining distribution coverage above 1.0x.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - Continued increase in size and scale of operations with
increased geographic diversity;

  - Leverage and distribution coverage sustain at 3.0x-3.5x and
above 1.0x, respectively,

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Significant credit event with counterparties, including
multi-notch downgrade at EVA's major counterparties, which will
impair future cash flow into EVA;

  - Unfavorable changes in regulatory environment with regard to
treatment and subsidies supporting biomass power generation as
renewable generation;

  - Capex spending or unfavorable dividend policy that
significantly reduces liquidity or increases leverage;

  - Leverage above 4.0x and distribution below 1.0x on a sustained
basis can result in a negative rating action.

LIQUIDITY AND DEBT STRUCTURE

Near-Term Liquidity Adequate: As of Sept. 30, 2019, EVA had
approximately $2 million of unrestricted cash and $165 million
available under its revolving credit facility for a total liquidity
of $167 million. The revolving credit facility has a maturity date
of October 2023. Fitch expects the company to have adequate
liquidity to fund its working capital and dividend distribution in
the near term.


ESG CONSIDERATIONS

EVA has an ESG Relevance Score of 4+ for serving in the biomass
industry that is viewed as environmental friendly for reducing
greenhouse gas emission. Biomass is viewed as a carbon-neutral
source of energy by the idea that carbon emitted from burning
sources of biomass such as wood pellets will be recaptured by the
new trees that are grown. EVA's ESG score has a positive impact on
the credit profile and is relevant to the rating in conjunction
with other factors.


EPIC COMPANIES: Seeks to Hire Porter Hedges as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Epic Companies, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to
employ Porter Hedges LLP, as counsel to the Debtors.

Epic Companies requires Porter Hedges to:

   (a) provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' rights
       and duties as debtors in possession and continued business
       operations;

   (b) assist, advise and represent the Debtors in analyzing the
       Debtors' capital structure, investigating the extent and
       validity of liens, cash collateral stipulations or
       contested matters;

   (c) assist, advise and represent the Debtors in any cash
       collateral and postpetition financing transactions;

   (d) assist, advise and represent the Debtors in the
       preparation of sale and bid procedures to auction the
       Debtors' assets;

   (e) assist, advise and represent the Debtors in any manner
       relevant to preserving and protecting the Debtors'
       estates;

   (f) investigate and prosecute preference, fraudulent transfer
       and other actions arising under the Debtors' bankruptcy
       avoiding powers;

   (g) prepare on behalf of the Debtors all necessary
       applications, motions, answers, orders, reports, and other
       legal papers;

   (h) appear in Court and to protect the Debtors' interests
       before the Court;

   (i) assist the Debtors in administrative matters;

   (j) perform all other legal services for the Debtors which may
       be necessary and proper in these proceedings;

   (k) assist, advise and represent the Debtors in any litigation
       matter;

   (l) continue to assist and advise the Debtors in general
       corporate and other matters; and

   (m) provide other legal advice and services, as requested by
       the Debtors, from time to time.

Porter Hedges will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                        $525 to $900
     Of Counsel                      $315 to $860
     Associates/Staff Attorneys      $350 to $525
     Paralegals                      $180 to $335

During the one year prior to the Petition Date, Porter Hedges
received $350,000 for fees and expenses related to the Chapter 11
Cases, $13,736 for filing fees in the Chapter 11 Cases, and
$26,625.08 in compensation for the litigation engagements.  All
amounts owed on account of recent restructuring work were paid
through the Debtors' Retainer for the advance payment of subsequent
invoices.  As of the Petition Date, the balance of the Retainer was
$24,284.78.

Porter Hedges will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

John F. Higgins, a partner of Porter Hedges, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Porter Hedges can be reached at:

     John F. Higgins, Esq.
     M. Shane Johnson, Esq.
     Genevieve M. Graham, Esq.
     PORTER HEDGES LLP
     1000 Main Street, 36th Floor
     Houston, TX 77002
     Tel: (713) 226-6000
     Fax: (713) 226-6248
     E-mail: jhiggins@porterhedges.com
             sjohnson@porterhedges.com
             ggraham@porterhedges.com

                     About Epic Companies

Headquartered in Houston, Epic Companies, LLC, is a full-service
provider to the global decommissioning, installation and
maintenance markets.  Its services include heavy lift, diving and
marine, specialty cutting and well plugging and abandonment
services.  It has limited ongoing operations and is owned 50
percent by Orinoco and 50 percent by Oakridge Natural Resources,
LLC and Oakridge Energy Partners LLC.

Epic Companies and six affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-34752) on Aug. 26, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, Epic Companies was estimated to have assets of
between $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of between $100
million and $500 million.

The Debtors tapped Porter Hedges LLP as bankruptcy counsel; S3
Advisors, LLC as restructuring advisor; and Epiq Corporate
Restructuring, LLC as claims agent; Lugenbuhl Wheaton Peck Rankin &
Hubbard, as special counsel.

Henry Hobbs Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 7, appointed a
committee of unsecured creditors on Sept. 6, 2019.


FFBC OPERATIONS: WestRock Seeks to Preserve its Rights in Equipment
-------------------------------------------------------------------
WestRock CP, LLC, submitted a limited objection and reservation of
rights to the FFBC Operations, LLC, et al.'s proposed Disclosure
Statement for their Joint Plan of Reorganization.

WestRock does not object to the Debtors' proposed restructuring as
outlined in the Plan. Rather, WestRock seeks only to preserve its
rights in certain equipment currently under the control of the
bankruptcy estate and its ability to investigate, analyze and
litigate, if necessary, the extent, priority and validity of its
secured claims and or equitable ownership in and to the Equipment.


Under the circumstances, WestRock believes: (i) that WestRock has a
first priority perfected security interest in the Equipment; and/or
(ii) that FFBC Operations does not hold title to the Equipment, and
as a result, such Equipment is not property of FFBC Operations’
bankruptcy estate.    

Attorneys for Westrock CP, LLC:

        ALLEN M. DeBARD
        LANGLEY & BANACK, INCORPORATED
        Trinity Plaza II, Suite 700
        745 East Mulberry
        San Antonio, TX 78212-3166
        Tel: (210)-736-6600
        Fax: (210) 735-6889
        E-mail: adebard@langleybanack.com

               - and -

        JONATHAN L. GOLD
        MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP
        1000 Main Avenue SW, Suite 400
        Washington, D.C. 20024
        E-mail: jlgold@michaelbest.com

               - and -

        JOSEPH D. BRYDGES
        MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP
        One South Pickney St., Suite 700
        Madison, WI 53703
        E-mail: jdbrydges@michaelbest.com

                     About FFBC Operations and
                        FFBC Real Estate

FFBC Operations, LLC, owns Celis Brewery, a craft brewery focusing
on Belgian-style beers.  FFBC Real Estate classifies its business
as single asset real estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
101(51B)).

FFBC Operations LLC and FFBC Real Estate, LLC, sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Lead Case
No. 19-10869) on July 1, 2019.  At the time of the filing, FFBC
Operations estimated assets between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities of the same range.  FFBC Real Estate estimated assets
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities between $10
million and $50 million.  The cases are assigned to Judge Tony M.
Davis.  Lansden Dortch & Davis, LLP, is the Debtors' legal counsel.


FIREBALL REALTY: Seeks to Hire Victor W. Dahar as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------------
Fireball Realty, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Hampshire to employ Victor W. Dahar,
P.A., as attorney to the Debtor.

Fireball Realty requires Victor W. Dahar to:

   a. prepare of the plan and disclosure statement;

   b. prepare motions for relief and post-petition/take-out
      financing issues;

   c. prepare objections to motions for relief and pending
      issues;

   d. provide assumption/rejection of executory contracts;

   e. represent for turnover, fraudulent transfer, preference
      actions and other avoidance or subordination actions;

   f. provide motions to Sell Real Estate and other litigation;

   g. negotiate with the creditors committee, if any, and
      creditors, as necessary; and

   h. render all other matters necessary and proper for the
      representation of the Debtor in the bankruptcy case.

Victor W. Dahar will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Eleanor Wm. Dahar, a partner at Victor W. Dahar, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Victor W. Dahar can be reached at:

     Eleanor Wm. Dahar, Esq.
     VICTOR W. DAHAR, P.A.
     20 Merrimack Street
     Manchester, NH 03101
     Tel: (603) 622-6595

                    About Fireball Realty

Fireball Realty LLC, a real estate agency in Manchester, New
Hampshire, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No.
19-10922) on June 28, 2019. In the petition signed by Charles R.
Sargent, Jr., member, the Debtor was estimated to have assets and
liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10 million.  The Debtor
tapped William S. Gannon, Esq., at William S. Gannon PLLC, as
counsel. The Debtor hries Victor W. Dahar, P.A., as attorney.


FITRITION LLC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Oct. 30, 2019, disclosed in a
court filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has
been appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Fitrition, LLC.

                     About Fitrition LLC

Fitrition LLC operates the gym Fitrition in the Denver Tech Center
in Syracuse St., in Denver.  Fitrition offers a variety of health
and fitness concepts such as barre classes, HIIT classes, and IV
therapy all under one roof.  According to its owner, the gym has
about 600 active members, who pay on average about $150 a month.

Fitrition, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Colo. Case
No. 19-18149) on Sept. 20, 2019.  In the petition signed by its
managing member, William H. Coleman III, the Debtor was estimated
to have assets ranging between $100,001 and $500,000 and
liabilities ranging between $500,001 and $1 million.  The Debtor is
represented by Wadsworth Garber Warner Conrardy, P.C.


FLORIDA CLEANEX: Dec. 5 Hearing on Disclosure Statement Set
-----------------------------------------------------------
The hearing on approval of the Disclosure Statement and
Confirmation of the Plan of Florida Cleanex, Inc., has been set on
Dec. 5, 2019 at 9:30 a.m., in United States Bankruptcy Court  299
E. Broward Blvd., #308  Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33301.

Dec. 2, 2109 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement and confirmation of
the plan.

The deadline for filing ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan is
on Nov. 28, 2019.

According to the Disclosure Statement, under the Plan, the
undisputed general unsecured claims of the Debtor total the amount
of $868,062.63, which will be paid a pro rata distribution on a
quarterly basis at $500 per month over the five-year term of the
Plan.  A copy of the Disclosure Statement filed Oct. 4, 2019, is
available at https://is.gd/i2arEV from PacerMonitor.com free of
charge.

                     About Florida Cleanex

Florida Cleanex, Inc., is a privately held company that offers
maintenance and complete janitorial services.  Florida Cleanex
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Fla. Case No. 19-13101) on March 8, 2019.  In the petition
signed by Luis Loaiza, president, the Debtor disclosed $174,078 in
assets and $1,175,100 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge Raymond B. Ray.  Kelley, Fulton & Kaplan, PL, is the Debtor's
counsel.

The U.S. Trustee did not appoint an official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 case.


FOX SUBACUTE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Four affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

      Debtor                                       Case No.
      ------                                       --------
      Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg, LLC           19-04714
      251 Stenton Ave
      Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1220

      Fox Nursing Home Corp.                       19-04715
         d/b/a Fox Subacute at Warrington
      2644 Bristol Road
      Warrington, PA 18976

      Fox Subacute at Clara Burke, Inc.            19-04716
      251 Stenton Avenue
      Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

      Fox Subacute at South Philadelphia, LLC      19-04717
      251 Stenton Avenue
      Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462-1220

Business Description: Fox Subacute -- http://www.foxsubacute.com
                      -- is a skilled nursing facility
                      in PA that specializes in pulmonary,
                      neurological, and rehabilitative care for
                      patients with degenerative neurological and
                      neuromuscular disease; and pulmonary care
                      and ventilator requirements with an emphasis
                      on vent weaning.  Fox offers short and long
                      term rehabilitation services customized to
                      each patient's individual needs.  Its
                      facilities are located in Plymouth Meeting,
                      Warrington, Mechanicsburg, and Philadelphia,
                      Pennsylvania and are licensed by the PA
                      Department of Health.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Pennsylvania (Harrisburg)

Judge: Hon. Henry W. Van Eck

Debtors' Counsel: Robert E. Chernicoff, Esq.
                  CUNNINGHAM, CHERNICOFF & WARSHAWSKY, P.C.
                  2320 North Second Street
                  Harrisburg, PA 17110
                  Tel: 717 238-6570
                  Fax: 717 238-4809
                  E-mail: rec@cclawpc.com

Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg's
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Fox Subacute at Mechanicsburg's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Fox Nursing Home's
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Fox Nursing Home's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Fox Subacute at Clara Burke's
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Fox Subacute at Clara Burke's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Fox Subacute at South Philadelphia's
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Fox Subacute at South Philadelphia's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petitions were signed by James M. Foulke, president.

Full-text copies of the Debtors' list of 20 largest unsecured
creditors are available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04714_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04715_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04716_creditors.pdf
      http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04717_creditors.pdf

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04714.pdf
           http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04715.pdf
           http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04716.pdf
           http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb19-04717.pdf


FRED'S INC: Hires Epiq as Administrative Advisor
------------------------------------------------
Fred's Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ Epiq
Corporate Restructuring, LLC, as administrative advisor to the
Debtors.

Fred's Inc. requires Epiq to:

   a. assist with, among other things, solicitation, balloting,
      and tabulation of votes, and prepare any related reports,
      as required in support of confirmation of a chapter 11
      plan, and in connection with such services, process
      requests for documents from parties in interest, including,
      if applicable, brokerage firms, bank back-offices, and
      institutional holders;

   b. prepare an official ballot certification and, if necessary,
      testify in support of the ballot tabulation results;

   c. assist with the preparation of the Debtors' schedules of
      assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs
      and gather data in conjunction therewith;

   d. provide a confidential data room, if requested;

   e. manage and coordinate any distributions pursuant to a
      chapter 11 plan; and

   f. provide such other processing, solicitation, balloting, and
      other administrative services described in the Engagement
      Agreement, but not covered by the Section 156(c) Order, as
      may be requested from time to time by the Debtors, the
      Court, or the Office of the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court
      (the "Clerk").

Epiq will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Executives                                       No Charge
     Executive Vice President, Solicitation           $193
     Solicitation Consultant                          $171
     Consultants/Directors/Vice Presidents            $144-$171
     Case Managers                                    $63-$148
     IT/Programming                                   $30-$76
     Clerical/Administrative Support                  $22-$40

Epiq will be paid a retainer in the amount of $25,000.

Epiq will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Brian Hunt, partner of Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Epiq can be reached at:

     Brian Hunt
     EPIQ CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, LLC
     777 3rd Ave., 12th Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: (212) 225-9200

                       About Fred's Inc.

Since 1947, Fred's, Inc. (NASDAQ:FRED) -- http://www.fredsinc.com/
-- has been an integral part of the communities it serves
throughout the southeastern United States. Fred's mission is to
make it easy AND exciting to save money.  Its unique discount value
store format offers customers a full range of value-priced everyday
items, along with terrific deals on closeout merchandise throughout
the store.

Fred's, Inc., and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11984) on Sept. 9, 2019 in
Delaware.  In the petitions signed by Joseph M. Anto, CEO, the
Debtors disclosed $474,774,000 in assets and $380,167,000 in
liabilities as of May 4, 2019.

The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as counsel;
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP as general bankruptcy counsel; Akin Gump
Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as special counsel; Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions LLC as claims and noticing agent; and Berkeley Research
Group, LLC, as financial advisor.


G & H LAND: Seeks to Hire Craig M. Geno as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
G & H Land Company, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Mississippi to hire the Law
Offices of Craig M. Geno, PLLC as its legal counsel.
   
The firm will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include legal advice on matters related to
contract negotiations, evaluation of claims of creditors,
representation in suits related to the affairs of Debtor's estate,
and the preparation of a reorganization plan.

The firm's hourly rates are:

          Craig Geno, Esq.      $425
          Associates            $250
          Paralegals            $185

Geno received $1,717 as payment for the filing fee.
  
The firm does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its eestate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Craig M. Geno, Esq.
     Law Offices of Craig M. Geno, PLLC
     587 Highland Colony Parkway
     P.O. Box 3380
     Ridgeland, MS 39158-3380
     Tel: 601-427-0048
     Fax: 601-427-0050
     E-mail: cmgeno@cmgenolaw.com

                   About G & H Land Company

G & H Land Company LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Miss. Case No. 19-14135) on Oct. 10,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of between $500,001 and $1 million and liabilities of the
same range.


GALVESTON BAY PROPERTIES: Case Summary & Top Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Two affiliates that concurrently filed voluntary petitions for
relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

      Debtor                                            Case No.
      ------                                            --------
      Galveston Bay Properties, LLC                     19-36075
      708 Main Street, 10th Floor
      Houston, TX 77002

      Galveston Bay Operating Company, LLC              19-36077
      708 Main Street, 10th Floor
      Houston, TX 77002

Business Description: Galveston Bay Properties is a privately held
                      company that operates in the oil and gas
                      extraction business.  The Debtor's principal
                      assets include oil and gas leases in
                      Chambersand Galveston Counties, Texas.  The
                      Debtor's operating affiliate, Galveston Bay
                      Operating Company LLC, operates the wells
                      located upon the Galveston Bay Assets.
                      Galveston Bay Properties previously sought
                      bankruptcy protection on Aug. 9, 2017
                     (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 17-51905) and
                      April 13, 2016 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
                      16-31923).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Judge: Hon. Eduardo V. Rodriguez

Debtors'
Bankruptcy
Counsel:          Kell Corrigan Mercer, Esq.
                  KELL C. MERCER, P.C.
                  1602 E. Cesar Chavez
                  Austin, TX 78702
                  Tel: 512-627-3512
                  E-mail: kell.mercer@mercer-law-pc.com

                     - and -

                  Chris Adams, Esq.
                  OKIN ADAMS, LLC

Galveston Bay Properties'
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Galveston Bay Properties'
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

Galveston Bay Operating's
Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Galveston Bay Operating's
Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petitions were signed by Andrey Medvedev, president of
Galveston Bay Properties and Andrey Platunov, president of
Galveston Bay Operating.

Full-text copies of the petitions containing, among other items,
lists of the Debtors' 20 largest unsecured creditors are available
for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-36075.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb19-36077.pdf


GENWORTH LIFE: Fitch Lowers IFS Ratings to CCC+
-----------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings downgraded the Insurer Financial Strength ratings of
Genworth Life Insurance Company and Genworth Life Insurance Company
of New York to 'CCC+' from 'B-' and the IFS rating of Genworth Life
and Annuity Insurance Company to 'B' from 'B+'. The Rating Outlook
for all ratings is Evolving.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

GLIC and GLICNY's ratings were downgraded due the decline in
statutory capitalization over the past year and ongoing concern
over long-term care reserve adequacy, particularly in light of the
decline in interest rates, which could result in additional
statutory reserve charges and further deterioration in statutory
capital. Fitch estimates GLIC and GLICNY's exposure to LTC reserves
as a percent of statutory capital is approximately 13x, materially
higher than most other U.S. insurers with exposure to LTC. Thus,
even small increases to recorded reserves could have a significant
negative effect on statutory capital. Further, the adequacy of LTC
reserves is highly sensitive to assumptions about interest rates
and future rate increases, though Fitch notes that GLIC has made
meaningful progress in obtaining those rate increases.

GLAIC's ratings were downgraded because Fitch believes GLIC's
ownership of GLAIC constrains GLIC's ratings. Fitch views GLAIC's
life insurance and annuity business as relatively more stable and
less risky than GLIC's LTC business, though GLAIC also has a
history of strained profitability and exposure to interest rates.
Additionally, GLAIC is better capitalized than GLIC. Fitch notes
that GLIC, GLICNY and GLAIC are domiciled in separate states -
Delaware, New York and Virginia, respectively. Fitch believes the
separation of regulatory supervision and the segregation of most of
the LTC reserves into GLIC and GLICNY indicates the standalone
profile of GLAIC is stronger than GLIC and GLICNY. However, GLAIC's
rating is negatively affected by its status as a wholly owned
subsidiary of GLIC.

Currently, the life and annuity reserves of the Genworth life
insurers are concentrated in GLAIC, while the LTC reserves are
recorded in GLIC and GLICNY. While GLIC and GLICNY wrote most of
the LTC business and GLAIC wrote much of the life and annuity
business, some reserves were moved through a series of reinsurance
transactions in anticipation of a previously-proposed unstacking
transaction. Some of those reinsurance transactions may be unwound
now that the unstacking will not occur. Nonetheless, Fitch believes
GLIC and GLICNY would still contain most of the LTC exposure even
if the reinsurance was unwound.

GLIC, GLICNY and GLAIC represent the primary U.S. life insurance
subsidiaries of Genworth Financial, Inc. (Genworth). In 2016,
Genworth announced a transaction whereby Genworth would be acquired
by China Oceanwide Holdings Group Co. Ltd. (Oceanwide). The
deadline for the proposed acquisition has been extended multiple
times due to a lengthy regulatory review and approval process.
Genworth has committed to contribute $175 million, through an
intermediate holding company, to GLIC. The contribution would be
made post-closing, provided the merger with Oceanwide closes. Fitch
believes the Genworth life insurers' access to the capital markets
for future funding needs and overall financial flexibility is
extremely limited. Genworth has indicated its unwillingness to
support the life insurers beyond the $175 million capital
contribution commitment if the merger is approved. As such, Fitch
rates GLIC, GLICNY and GLAIC on a stand-alone basis.

In August 2019, Genworth announced the sale of its majority
interest in Genworth MI Canada, Inc. to Brookfield Investment
Partners (Brookfield) for CAD$2.4 billion. Brookfield also agreed
to provide Genworth with up to $850 million in bridge financing in
the event regulatory approvals for the sale are not received by
Oct. 31, 2019. Genworth indicated that the sale will facilitate the
completion of its merger into Oceanwide. The sale of Genworth MI
Canada, Inc. helps Genworth meet upcoming debt maturities, but
causes the company to lose a source of dividend income, and is
indicative of a lack of financial flexibility at the holding
company.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Key rating sensitivities that could result in a rating downgrade of
GLIC and GLICNY include:

  -- Significant additional charges related to long-term care or
run-off business that lead to a material decline in statutory
capital.

Key rating sensitivities that could result in a rating upgrade to
GLIC and GLICNY include:

  -- A material improvement in statutory capital.

Key rating sensitivities that could result in a rating downgrade to
GLAIC include:

  -- GLAIC would likely be downgraded if GLIC is downgraded.

Key rating sensitivities that could result in rating upgrade to
GLAIC include:

  -- GLAIC could be upgraded if GLIC was upgraded.

If Genworth and Oceanwide, should the acquisition close,
demonstrate a willingness and ability to support the life insurers,
the ratings could be re-evaluated.

If Fitch has insufficient information to evaluate the effect of
Oceanwide's ownership on the rated entities, Fitch may have to
withdraw the ratings for lack of information.

ESG CONSIDERATIONS

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) credit relevance is a
score of 3 ‒ ESG issues are credit neutral or have only a minimal
credit impact on the entity, either due to their nature or the way
in which they are being managed by the entity.


GLENVIEW HEALTH: Committee Hires Bingham Greenebaum as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Glenview Health Care
Facility, Inc., seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Kentucky to retain Bingham Greenebaum
Doll LLP, as counsel to the Committee.

The Committee requires Bingham Greenebaum to:

   a. advise the Committee of its rights, powers and duties as a
      creditors' committee operating under section 1103 of the
      Bankruptcy Code;

   b. prepare on behalf of the Committee all necessary and
      appropriate applications, motions, objections, proposed
      orders, miscellaneous pleadings, notices, schedules and
      other documents, and reviewing all financial and other
      reports to filed in the Chapter 11 Cases;

   c. negotiate on behalf of the Committee with the Debtor, its
      secured creditors, and other parties in interest in
      connection with the Debtor's use of cash collateral and the
      Debtor's exit-strategy from chapter 11, including, but not
      limited to, a sale or plan of reorganization;

   d. review the nature and validity of any liens asserted
      against the Debtor's property and advising the Committee
      concerning the enforceability of such liens;

   e. advise the Committee regarding its ability to initiate
      actions to collect and recover property for the benefit of
      the Debtor's bankruptcy estate;

   f. advise and assist the Committee in connection with any of
      the Debtor's potential property dispositions; and

   g. provide non-bankruptcy services for the Committee to the
      extent requested by the Committee and necessary to
      advocate the interests of the Debtor's unsecured
      creditors.

Bingham Greenebaum will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Carmin Grandinetti, Partner           $395
     James R. Irving, Partner              $295
     April A. Wimberg, Associate           $250

Bingham Greenebaum will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

James R. Irving, a partner at Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not
creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the Debtors; (b)
has not been, within two years before the date of the filing of the
Debtors' chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees of
the Debtors; and (c) does not have an interest materially adverse
to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or
equity security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect
relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtors, or
for any other reason.

Bingham Greenebaum can be reached at:

     James R. Irving, Esq.
     April A. Wimberg, Esq.
     BINGHAM GREENEBAUM DOLL LLP
     3500 PNC Tower, 101 South Fifth Street
     Louisville, KY 40202
     Telephone: 502-587-3606
     E-mail: jirving@bgdlegal.com
             awimberg@bgdlegal.com

            About Glenview Health Care Facility

Glenview Health Care Facility, Inc., owns and operates a small
health care facility with 60 beds that provides nursing home
services.

Glenview Health Care Facility sought relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 19-10795) in Bowling
Green, Kentucky on Aug. 1, 2019.  As of the Petition Date, the
Debtor's assets are between $1 million and $10 million; and its
liabilities are estimated within the same range.  Judge Joan A.
Lloyd oversees the Debtor's case.  Mark H. Flener, Esq., is the
Debtor's counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 8 on Aug. 30, 2019, appointed two
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained Bingham Greenebaum
Doll LLP, as counsel.


GRAN COLOMBIA: Fitch Affirms 'B' LongTerm IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings affirmed Gran Colombia Gold Corp.'s Long-Term Foreign
and Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings at 'B'. The Rating
Outlook is Stable. GCM's rating reflects the company's small scale
of operations compared to Fitch's gold mining rated peers; its cash
flow generation stemming primarily from its Segovia operations; and
the sustainability of its low cash costs in the face of expected
lower grades over the coming years as outlined in the latest
prefeasibility study for its mineral reserves dated April 2019.

GCM remains a highly speculative credit and is vulnerable to weak
gold prices and a stronger Colombian peso, although some margin of
safety remains. GCM's credit risk lies after 2020 when its
production profile, in particular at its Providencia and Sandra K
mines within the mining title at Segovia begin to decline coupled
with the expectation of lower grades across its mines. GCM is
undergoing an extensive drilling campaign at Segovia and has
identified 24 veins not currently in production. The company is
also undergoing a spin-out of its 100% owned Marmato mining assets
located in the zona baja of its mining title which includes its
USD269 million deep zone project.

GCM's margin of safety relative to its high credit risk include its
overall low debt load, build-up of its liquidity to over USD50
million, and prospects to maintain its production volumes at
Segovia through additional exploration coupled with the mine
expansion opportunity at its Marmato project.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Single-Asset Exposure: Approximately 89% of GCM's mining production
comes from mines at its Segovia operations, which generate
essentially all its EBITDA. Segovia operations are made up of three
operational mines, one processing plant and additional artisanal
miners that operate on GCM's approximately 9,000-hectare
concessions. Cash flow concentration at Segovia heightens the
impact of production stoppages due to accidents, labor unrest and
weather events, and is factored into the 'B' rating. Segovia's mine
life currently runs through 2026, with 2.5 million ounces of total
resources and high ore grades relative to other underground gold
mines.

Volatile Cost Structure: The company's rating is also constrained
by its cost structure's vulnerability to declining ore grades,
increased capex related to drilling programs to build-out reserves,
and to the value of the Colombian peso. The company's cost
structure improved to USD855 per ounce as of June 30, 2019 from
USD1,325 per ounce in 2013. Part of the improvement in its cost
structure was the result of a weakening peso coupled with higher
output, which lowered fixed costs per unit. A stronger peso would
pressure the company's cost structure. All-in sustaining cost
(AISC) is expected to remain around USD925 per ounce for 2019 and
start to increase in 2020 as GCM increases its drilling and mining
developments at Segovia. Cash costs are also expected to be
negatively impacted as the company produces gold more at the
reserve grade level of 12 g/t compared to its current head grades
of 17.8 g/t during 2019.

Marmato Spin-off Credit Neutral: Fitch views GCM's spin-off of its
Marmato project, held through a wholly owned subsidiary, into a new
separate listed entity as credit neutral to the 'B' rating. The
resulting structure should end with GCM owning 55%-65% of the new
listed entity, and will require GCM to release the Marmato
subsidiary from the security package of its senior secured gold
linked notes. Under the current terms of the notes, Marmato is
eligible to be removed from the security package once GCM has
repaid at least USD37.5 million of the principal of the debt, which
is expected to be in April 2020. However, the company is bringing
forward this event and will not need approval from note holders
given certain provisions in the note indenture.

The spin-off is being done in order to develop the deep
mineralization project at Marmato and to raise financing which is
expected to be non-recourse to GCM. Capital injections into the new
listed entity for the prefeasibility study, additional drilling and
to establish initial working capital are expected to be funded by
Gran Colombia and a brokered private placement to other investors,
however, the financing package for the USD269 million project is
currently not known. The upper existing mining operations in Zona
Baja require minimal capital investment and should produce
35,000-40,000 ounces annually.
Strong Operating Performance: The company's operating performance
has benefitted from a 6% increase in gold production to over
230,000 ounces during LTM June 30, 2019, an 8% decline in its
all-in sustaining cash costs to USD855/ounce through 1H19, coupled
with favorable gold prices. Fitch projects GCM to generate EBITDA
around USD140 million during 2019, while maintaining solid free
cash flow generate for debt service and bolster its already
strengthened liquidity position when compared to 24 months ago. GCM
expects to use its operating cash flow and a portion of its USD14.9
million issuance of convertible debentures due 2024 during April
2019 to fund its drilling program at Segovia in order to build out
reserves and future mine production.

Positive FCF Generation; Capital Allocation Strategy: Fitch
projects GCM will maintain its positive FCF generation through
2020, with capital expenditures remaining around USD50 million
during the next two years and benefitting from favorable gold
prices. GCM has maintained positive FCF since 2015, however cash
flow generation is sensitive to gold prices, with a USD100 change
in price leading to an approximately USD10 million negative change
in FCF generation. Cash flow generation at its Segovia asset is
anticipated to be allocated towards amortizing its gold-linked
notes and to be used to increase exploration activities across
Segovia, extend its reserves and resources, and further explore and
develop the 24 known veins under its mining title.

Solid Credit Metrics: GCM's financial profile has benefited from a
weaker FX rate, stronger gold prices and increased gold production
at an average head grade of 17.8 g/t. Credit metrics have also been
supported by its amortization schedule under its senior secured
gold linked notes. GCM recorded gross and net leverage ratios of
0.9x and 0.5x, respectively, for 2018, compared with 1.1x and 1.3x,
respectively, for fiscal 2017. Fitch projects the company will
exhibit favorable credit metrics over the next two years, absent
significant periods of lower gold prices or a change in its
non-recourse funding strategy at Marmato.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

GCM's 'B' rating results from its small scale of operations,
relatively low reserve mine life and lack of commodity
diversification, partially offset by the company's low leverage and
manageable debt on balance sheet, its high grade Segovia asset, and
competitive all-in sustaining cost position relative to peers.

GCM's AISC of USD855/ounce through June 30, 2019 is better
positioned than that of Yamana Gold Inc. (BBB-/Stable) at
USD936/ounce, Kinross Gold Corp. (BBB-/Stable) at USD925/ounce and
Nord Gold SE (BB/Stable) at USD1,071/ounce. GCM's AISC is projected
to remain below $925/ounce for 2019, but remains vulnerable to an
expectation of lower ore grades after 2020 and an appreciation of
the Colombia peso which constitutes over 50% of the company's cost
structure. Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.'s (BBB-/Stable)
AISC historically has been much lower than GCM's as the company
benefits from its significant by-product production, whereas GCM
does not currently produce significant by-product minerals.

The company is a small-scale gold producer, with its Segovia
operations generating essentially all the company's cash flow
generation. Segovia is made up of three mines and one processing
mill, with operations consisting of both company-operated areas and
an artisanal miner model that contracts local miners to operate on
GCM's concessions. GCM's production profile is small, with around
240,000 ounces expected for 2019. This compares poorly to
Buenaventura, which has six mines with total gold production of
approximately 390,000 ounces (excluding Yanacocha), among other
minerals, and other mid-sized gold producers such as Yamana Gold
Inc. (BBB-/Stable) and Nord Gold SE (BB/Stable) which both produce
roughly 1 million gold equivalent ounces per year. GCM produces a
small amount of silver, but essentially lacks mineral and operating
diversification compared with polymetallic miners located in Peru.
GCM's estimated reserve life is also on the low end at around seven
years, compared with its larger peers, such as Yamana (eight
years), Kinross Gold (10 years) and Nord Gold (15 years).

GCM is weaker than its mining peers from a financial risk
perspective, given the high operational risk associated with
production tied primarily to its Segovia asset. GCM's EBITDA margin
is projected to be around 40% through 2020, which compares
similarly to Nord Gold's 40%-43% and Buenaventura's 26%-34%. GCM's
cash position improved materially during 2019; however, the company
lacks the financial flexibility and more diverse sources of
unsecured funding as compared with its several of its higher rated
peers.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- Average gold price of USD1,395/ounce in 2019, $1,350/ounce in
2020, and $1,200/ounce thereafter;

  -- All-in sustaining cash cost of $925/ounce in 2019 and
increasing to $955/ounce in 2020;

  -- Production volumes and ore grades in line with management
guidance;

  -- Capex of around USD50 million in both 2019 and 2020;

  -- Flat Colombia FX rate.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Successful completion of its Marmato project coupled with
successful increase in reserve life at Segovia leading to sustained
gold production;

  -- Diversification into other commodities or increase in its
existing scale of operations.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Deterioration in liquidity position resulting in cash and
equivalents below USD20 million on a prolonged basis;

  -- Prolonged strikes or mine closures that would halt or
significantly lower gold production.

LIQUIDITY

Strengthened Liquidity Position: GCM reported Fitch-adjusted cash
and equivalents of USD56.5 million as of June 30, 2019, compared
with USD38.9 million as of Dec. 31, 2018 and USD15.2 million as of
Dec. 31, 2017. Fitch includes USD5.2 million of gold in the
company's senior secured gold-linked notes trust account for its
liquidity and leverage metrics, as this account will be used solely
for debt repayment.

GCM has a predictable amortization schedule under its 2024 senior
secured gold-linked notes that allow the company to improve its
capital structure and liquidity position. The gold-linked notes
require GCM to set aside of proportion of its monthly gold
production. The total amount of gold to be deposited is 78,394
ounces, which is less than 10% of the Segovia operations' total
projected future production. Under the terms of the notes, a
reference price of USD1,250 per ounce is used on the amortization
payment date. If the actual gold price is above the reference
price, GCM is required to make an additional cash payment
representing a gold premium to investors that does not lead to
additional amortization. Any shortfall in the proceeds from the
sale of the gold ounces below USD1,250 per ounce is also paid by
GCM. The company engages in gold-hedging contracts to reduce the
exposure it has to prices for the gold held in the amortizing trust
fund. GCM issued USD14.9 million of convertible debentures due 2024
during April 2019, with proceeds to be used to fund its drilling
program at Segovia in order to build out reserves and future mine
production.

ESG Commentary

Unless otherwise disclosed in this section, the highest level of
ESG credit relevance is a score of 3 - ESG issues are credit
neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity, either
due to their nature or the way in which they are being managed by
the entity.

Gran Colombia has an ESG relevance score of '4' for SCR - related
to land rights/conflicts risk, as the company is exposed to
historical local unrest in the communities surrounding its Marmato
and Segovia mining operations. Mining disruptions resulting from
conflicts have not occurred since 2017.

Recovery Analysis

  -- The recovery analysis assumes that GCM would be reorganized as
a going-concern in bankruptcy rather than liquidated.

  -- Fitch has assumed a 10% administrative claim.

  -- GCM's going concern EBITDA is estimated at USD70 million, to
reflect a weaker gold price environment, lower ore grades compared
to the current grades being mined, and a more distressed cost
structure similar to the default scenario in 2015.

  -- An EV multiple of 7x is used to calculate a
post-reorganization valuation and reflects a mid-cycle multiple.
The estimate considers the average EV/EBITDA Multiple for metals
and mining companies provided by PWC of 9.5x, adjusted downward to
reflect the unique and increased operational risks at GCM.

  -- The waterfall results in a 100% recovery corresponding to an
'RR1' for the senior secured gold-linked notes of USD73.6 million.
An uplift of the proposed senior secured notes is not warranted as
an overwhelming majority of GCM's assets are located in Colombia,
which restricts the notes to 'RR4'.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Gran Colombia Gold Corp.

  -- Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR at 'B';

  -- Long-Term Local Currency IDR at 'B';

  -- Senior Secured Notes at 'B'/'RR4'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


HARBORVIEW TOWERS: District Court Affirms Clarification Order
-------------------------------------------------------------
The appeals case captioned PAUL C. CLARK, SR., et al., Appellants,
v. MONIQUE S. ALMY, Appellees, Civil Case No. SAG-19-01437 (D. Md.)
results from the reorganization of the Council of Unit Owners of
The 100 Harborview Drive Condominium in Chapter 11 bankruptcy
proceedings before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland. The Bankruptcy Court awarded damages to
Appellants and Creditors Paul C. Clark, Sr., Rebecca Delorme, and
Paul C. Clark, Jr. during the Chapter 11 reorganization process.
Plan Officer Monique Almy and the Reorganized Debtor sought a
clarification that the Bankruptcy Court's damages award did not
address Appellants' responsibility for paying assessment fees at
the condominium. The Bankruptcy Court issued an Order, as requested
by Appellees.

Upon review, District Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher denies in part
and grants in part Appellees' Motion to Dismiss, and affirms the
Bankruptcy Court's decision.

Appellants filed several claims against the Council as part of the
Chapter 11 process, collectively asserting more than $25 million in
damages. The claims related to prepetition litigation between the
parties, alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act, property
damage to Unit PH4A, and consequential and other damages allegedly
resulting from these claims. The Council filed objections to these
claims, and Appellants, correspondingly, filed an opposition to the
objections. After a multi-day trial, the Bankruptcy Court issued
its Preliminary Order on April 10, 2018. On the same day, the
Bankruptcy Court issued its order confirming the Council's Fifth
Amended Plan of Reorganization.

In the Confirmed Plan, the court-appointed Monique Almy as Plan
Officer. She was responsible for implementing the Plan with respect
to Class 7 claims. On April 5, 2019, Almy, in her capacity as Plan
Officer, filed a Motion for Clarification with the Bankruptcy
Court. Almy contended that Dr. Clark underpaid assessment fees from
October 2017 through August 2018, and refused to pay assessment
fees for June and October 2018. According to Reorganized Debtor,
Dr. Clark owed $13,925.56 in total for unpaid assessments. As his
defense, Dr. Clark took the position that the Bankruptcy Court had
explicitly rejected any arguments regarding amounts of unpaid
assessments. Accordingly, the Plan Officer sought for the
Bankruptcy Court to determine whether its prior orders had resolved
Appellants' liability to pay assessments relating to Unit PH4A. The
Bankruptcy Court granted the motion for clarification on May 1,
2019, and confirmed that its prior orders did not address the
Creditors' obligation to pay assessments.

Appellants timely filed their notice of appeal with respect to the
Clarification Order, on May 16, 2019. However, Appellants filed
their supporting brief on July 11, 2019, which was six days after
the deadline imposed by Bankruptcy Rule 8018.  The Plan Officer
filed a Motion to Dismiss the appeal, claiming (1) the appeal is
not ripe for judicial review and (2) the appeal brief was untimely
under Rule 8018 and Local Rule 404.3.

In the Clarification Order, the Bankruptcy Court determined that
the Preliminary Order and Final Order "in no way involved the
Debtor's rights, remedies, or claims against the Creditors for
unpaid assessments." Appellants contend that the Clarification
Order should be overturned, because the Reorganized Debtor's claims
are barred under collateral estoppel and res judicata.

The doctrine of res judicata encompasses claim preclusion and issue
preclusion, i.e., collateral estoppel. A party must establish three
elements for claim preclusion: (1) the prior judgment was final and
on the merits, (2) the parties are identical, or in privity, in the
two actions, and (3) the claim in the second matter is based upon
the same cause of action involved in the earlier proceeding. The
first two elements are not in dispute. However, the Bankruptcy
Court found that element three was not satisfied. The District
Court agrees.

Case law illustrates that the timing of alleged conduct is the
focus of a court's inquiry. Here, timing was also central to the
Bankruptcy Court's clarification. Specifically, the Preliminary
Damages Order and Final Damages Order addressed claims between the
parties that arose before the Reorganized Debtor filed its petition
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in March 2016. The issue of unpaid
assessments, on the other hand, arose "postpetition," i.e.,
throughout 2017 and 2018. As the District Court explained, the
"claims" referred to in the Preliminary Order referred to
Appellants' claims against the Reorganized Debtor for violations of
the Fair Housing Act, property damage to Unit PH4A, and for
consequential and other related damages. The Order did not address
any claims related to unpaid assessments.

In Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens, Ltd., 619 F.3d 301 (4th Cir. 2010),
a plaintiff sued the Ravens organization and various National
Football League entities for copyright infringement. In an earlier
suit, a jury had awarded the plaintiff zero dollars in damages for
infringements. In the latter suit, he sought to enjoin the
defendants from depicting the copyrighted logo in season highlight
films, and in the team's corporate lobby. According to the court,
res judicata did not bar the second action because, while the
initial suit concerned infringements that took place prior to the
final judgment, the suit at issue sought to remedy present
infringements.

This case presents a similar situation. While the Chapter 11
reorganization process involved prepetition claims, the Bankruptcy
Court did not address postpetition activities -- such as collection
of assessments. Indeed, much of the potential liability for unpaid
assessments arose in June and October of 2018, months after the
Bankruptcy Court entered its preliminary award of damages. Based on
this timing, any claim for assessment fees is not based upon the
same "cause of action" involved in the reorganization proceedings.
The Bankruptcy Court correctly determined that its prior orders did
not absolve Appellants of their responsibility to pay assessments;
in fact, neither the Preliminary Damages Order nor the Final
Damages Order spoke to the issue of assessments. Thus, the District
Court affirms the Clarification Order in which the Bankruptcy Court
explained that issues pertaining to assessments had not been
adjudicated.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Oct. 9, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2Wj6sVy from Leagle.com.

Paul C. Clark, Sr., Rebecca Delorme & Paul Clark, Jr., Appellants,
represented by Brennan C. McCarthy, Brennan McCarthy & Associates.

Monique Desiree Almy, Plan Officer, Appellee, pro se.

Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive, Debtor,
represented by James R. Schraf -- schraf@yvslaw.com -- Yumkas,
Vidmar, Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC, Lisa Yonka Stevens --
stevens@yvslaw.com -- Yumkas, Vidmar, Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC &
Paul Sweeney -- sweeney@yvslaw.com -- Yumkas, Vidmar, Sweeney &
Mulrenin, LLC.

                About Council of Unit Owners
           of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium

Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium, a
condominium association, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 16-13049) on March 9, 2016.
In the petition signed by Dr. Reuben Mezrich, president, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50
million. Judge James F. Schneider is assigned to the case.  The
Debtor is represented by Paul Sweeny, Esq., at Yumkas, Vidmar,
Sweeney & Mulrenin, LLC.


HERITAGE HOTEL: Seeks to Hire Johnson Pope as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Heritage Hotel Associates, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire Johnson
Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP as its legal counsel.
   
The firm will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include legal advice regarding its duties
under the Bankruptcy Code, and the analysis and prosecution of
avoidance actions.

The Debtor paid the firm a pre-bankruptcy retainer in the amount of
$20,000, of which $1,717 was used to pay the filing fee.

The firm's attorneys do not represent a creditor or person adverse
to the Debtor and its bankruptcy estate, according to court
filings.

Johnson Pope can be reached through:

     Michael C. Markham, Esq.
     Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns, LLP
     401 East Jackson Street, Suite 3100
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: 813-225-2500
     Fax: 813-223-7118
     Email: mikem@jpfirm.com

                  About Heritage Hotel Associates

Heritage Hotel Associates, LLC, is a single asset real estate
debtor (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  Heritage Hotel
Associates sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-09946) on Oct. 21, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have assets of
between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of between $1
million and $10 million.


HIGHLAND SALONS: Nov. 4 Hearing on Disclosure Statement
-------------------------------------------------------
A hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m. on Nov. 4, 2019 in Courtroom
400, 4th Floor, 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, Texas 77002 to consider
approval of Highland Salons, LP proposed disclosure statement.

All objections to the disclosure statement must be filed and served
no later than October 31, 2019.

As reported in the TCR, Highland Salons, L.P., filed a Chapter 11
Plan that says that due to
the substantial equity in the Katy Office Building, the Debtor has
hired a commercial real estate broker with approval of the Court
and intends to sell the building and pay all claimants in full,
with interest.  According to the Disclosure Statement, the Plan
proposes to pay off claims as follows:

   * Class 1 - Secured claim of Taxing authorities, including
Harris County and Katy ISD for ad valorem tax for years 2017, 2018
and 2019 in amount of $58,231. IMPAIRED.  Single payment of
$1,237.

   * Class 2 - Secured claim of Compass Bank with allowed secured
amount $1,103,858.  IMPAIRED. Monthly payment of $5,000.  Full
payment on sale of Office Bldg.

   * Class 3 - General Unsecured Class. IMPAIRED. Single Payment
within 18 months. Full payment on sale of Office Bldg.

A full-text copy of the Original Disclosure Statement dated Oct.
18, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y28gr2sz from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                    About Highland Salons Ltd

Highland Salons Ltd was founded in 2003 by its current family
owners, Manuel Guevara and his spouse Manuel Guevara who
incorporated the entity under Texas Law for the purpose of
constructing a retail sundries and fuel facility to be located on
the expanding Katyarea in Northwest Harris County, Texas.

In 2003 the Guevaras acquired a parcel of real property containing
10,440 square feet, located at 21720 Highland Knoll Drive, Katy,
Harris County, Texas 77450.  The Guevaras invested their own funds
and obtained a construction loan.  In 2012, the Debtor obtained a
loan from U.S. Small Business Administration administered by
Compass Bank ("SBA Loan") in the amount of $1,320,000.  Guevara
constructed the building to house independent salon and spa
professionals in Katy, Texas.  Currently 50 available stations
exist, with over 24 rented at an average rate of $250 per week.

Highland Salons sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-30540) on Feb. 1,
2019. At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3,553,410 in
assets and $1,019,255 in liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge David R. Jones.  The Debtor tapped Law Office of Peter
Johnson as its legal counsel.  No official committee of unsecured
creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


HUNTINGTON PROPERTY: Seeks to Hire Woodyard Realty as Broker
------------------------------------------------------------
Huntington Property, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Tennessee to hire a real estate
broker.
   
In an application filed in court, the Debtor proposes to employ
Woodyard Realty Company to sell the Huntington Hills apartment
complex.  

Woodyard will get 3 percent of the gross sale as compensation for
its services.

Steve Woodyard and Lea Heilig, the firm's real estate agents who
will be providing the services, are "disinterested" within the
meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Steve Woodyard
     Lea Heilig
     Woodyard Realty Company
     5865 Ridgeway Center Parkway, Suite 300  
     Memphis, TN 38120
     Phone: 901.767.1998
     Fax: 888.252.0319

                    About Huntington Property

Huntington Property LLC, a single asset real estate debtor (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)), is a Tennessee limited
liability company.  It operates from its principal place of
business at 2872 Coach, Memphis, Tenn.  

Huntington Property sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Tenn.
Case No. 19-25923) on July 31, 2019.  As of the Petition Date,
Debtor was estimated to have assets between $1 million and $10
million, and liabilities within the same range.  Victor Hugo
Torres, managing member, signed the petition.   Judge Paulette J.
Delk is assigned the Debtor's case.  Toni Campbell Parker, Esq., is
the Debtor's counsel.


INNOVATIVE MATTRESS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
Innovative Mattress Solutions, LLC, won court approval of its the
Disclosure Statement.

The hearing on confirmation of the Plan will be held on Thursday,
December 19, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. (EST) in the United States
Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of Kentucky, 100 E. Vine Street,
Second Floor Courtroom, Lexington, Kentucky.

Dec.12, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to confirmation of the Plan.

Within six days after the entry of the Disclosure Statement Order,
the Plan, the Disclosure Statement, the Disclosure Statement Order
and a ballot conforming to Official Form B314 must be mailed to
creditors, equity security holders, and other parties in interest,
and must be transmitted to the United States Trustee.

               About Innovative Mattress Solutions

Innovative Mattress Solutions, LLC, operates 142 specialty sleep
retail locations primarily in the southeastern U.S. under the names
Sleep Outfitters, Mattress Warehouse, and Mattress King.  It offers
sleep outfitters, complete beds, electric adjustable beds, bed bug
protectors, sheets and pillows.  Innovative Mattress Solutions was
founded in 1983 and is based in Lexington, Kentucky.

Innovative Mattress Solutions, LLC, and 10 affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Lead Case No. 19-50042) on
Jan. 11, 2019.  The Hon. Gregory R. Schaaf is the case judge.
Innovative Mattress estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million
and liabilities of the same range.  

The Debtors tapped Delcotto Law Group PLLC as counsel; Jackson
Kelly PLLC, and Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, as special
counsel; Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P., as accountant; and
Conway Mackenzie, Inc. as financial advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Jan. 23, 2019, appointed seven
creditors to serve on an official committee of unsecured creditors.
The committee retained Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP, as counsel;
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, as co-counsel; and Province, Inc., as
financial advisor.


JAGGED PEAK: Seeks to Hire Cowen and Company as Investment Banker
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jagged Peak, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Nevada to hire Cowen and Company, LLC as its
investment banker.

The firm will provide services in connection with the Chapter 11
cases filed by the company and its affiliates:

     a. assist the Debtors in analyzing their business, operations,
assets, financial condition and prospects;

     b. assist the Debtors in their analysis and consideration of
financing alternatives;

     c. assist the Debtors in identifying and evaluating parties
that may be interested in a financing or sale;

     d. advise the Debtors on tactics and strategies for
negotiating with potential investors, and if requested, participate
in such negotiations;

     e. assist in preparing materials describing the Debtors for
distribution and presentation to parties that might be interested
in a financing or sale;

     f. advise the Debtors on the timing, nature and terms of new
securities, other considerations or other inducements to be offered
pursuant to any restructuring;

     g. render financial advice to the Debtors and participate in
meetings or negotiations with stakeholders, rating agencies and
other appropriate parties in connection with a restructuring;

     h. attend meetings of the Debtors' boards of directors and
their committees; and

i. provide oral and written testimony.

Cowen will be compensated as follows:

     a. A monthly fee of $100,000;

     b. A fee upon the closing of a financing transaction in an
amount equal to the applicable percentage of the gross proceeds or
aggregate principal amount of the financing irrevocably committed
or funded in connection with such transaction (whether or not
actually drawn):

        (i) 5 percent for equity or equity-linked securities,
including preferred equity and convertible debt;

       (ii) 3 percent for committed unsecured debt; and  

      (iii) 1.5 percent for debtor-in-possession or other secured
financing.

     c. A $1 million fee payable upon the consummation of a
restructuring.

     d. A sale fee equal to the greater of $1 million and 2 percent
of the aggregate consideration, 50 percent of which will be
credited against the restructuring fee.

Cowen and its employees do not hold any interest adverse to the
Debtors and their bankruptcy estates, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Lorie Beers
     Cowen and Company, LLC
     599 Lexington Avenue
     New York, NY 10022
     Phone: 646-562-1250
     Email: lorie.beers@cowen.com

                        About Jagged Peak

Jagged Peak Inc. and its subsidiaries are software companies in
Tampa, Florida. The Debtors deliver end-to-end global eCommerce
solutions that help companies break into new markets and build
customer base by creating a seamless experience across borders for
all product types.

Jagged Peak, Inc., based in Tampa, FL, and its debtor-affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Lead Case No.
19-15959) on Sept. 16, 2019.

In the petitions signed by CRO Jeremy Rosentha, Jagged Peak, and
TradeGlobal, LLC, were estimated to have assets of $50 million to
$100 million and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million; and
TradeGlobal North America Holding, Inc. was estimated to have
assets of $1 million to $10 million and estimated liabilities of
less than $50,000.

The Hon. Mike K. Nakagawa oversees the cases.

Gregory E. Garman, Esq., at Garman Turner Gordon, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.  BMC Group, Inc., is the claims
and noticing agent to the Debtors.


JAMES QUEZADA: District Court Affirms Ruling in Tax Dispute
-----------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned JAMES QUEZADA AND SIMONA QUEZADA, Appellants, v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, Cause No. 1:18-CV-797-LY (W.D.
Tex.) is an appeal from the Memorandum Opinion and Final Judgment
rendered on August 31, 2018, by the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division. Following
argument, the Quezadas filed a Motion for Leave to Clarify and
Correct the Record on July 24, 2019.  United States of America
filed its Objection to Appellants' Motion for Leave to Clarify and
Correct the Record and Response to Appellants' Post-Submission
Brief on August 16, 2019.

District Judge Lee Yeakel concludes that Appellants' Motion for
Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record should be denied and the
bankruptcy court's order should be affirmed.

On April 21, 2016, the Quezadas filed for bankruptcy under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On Nov. 22, 2016, Quezada filed an
Adversary Complaint challenging the assessment of a backup
withholding tax. The parties consented to the bankruptcy court's
rendering of a final judgment with respect to the issues raised in
the Adversary Complaint. The adversary case was tried May 3, 2018,
and the bankruptcy court rendered a Memorandum Opinion and a Final
Judgment in favor of the United States on August 31, 2018,
concluding that the taxes assessed by the IRS are valid, allowed,
and non-dischargeable. On Sept. 17, 2018, the Quezadas timely filed
a Notice of Appeal.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the filing of Forms 1099 and
1040 by the Quezadas commenced the three-year statute of
limitations under Section 6501 of the Internal Revenue Code, see 26
U.S.C. section 6501 (2011 & Supp. 2019), which prohibits tax
assessments made after the statute of limitations has closed.  The
Quezadas argue that  their filings of Forms 1099 and 1040 were
"returns" sufficient to trigger the three-year statute of
limitations, and that their failure to file Forms 945, which they
assert were not required, had no bearing on the start of the
statute-of-limitations period.

The United States asserts that the Quezadas were required and
failed to conduct backup withholding from their contract laborers,
and therefore were also required and failed to report this backup
withholding on Forms 945 for tax years 2005 through 2008. The
government further contends that because no Forms 945 were filed,
the three-year assessment limitation period imposed by Section 6501
was never triggered, and the bankruptcy court properly determined
that the backup withholding liability assessed against them in 2014
was not barred by Section 6501.

Section 6501(a)(3) of Title 26 of the United States Code imposes a
three-year tax-assessment-limitation period beginning on the date a
taxpayer files a "return required to be filed." Section 6011
requires a taxpayer to file a return in accordance with the forms
and regulations prescribed by the IRS. Under the applicable
regulation, a person required to withhold backup withholding tax
must file a Form 945. In addition, Section 3406 requires a payor to
conduct backup withholding when a payee fails to provide the payor
a TIN.

The bankruptcy court found that the Quezadas failed to prove that
they had the required TINs when they filed Forms 1040 and 1099 for
tax years 2005 through 2008.  James Quezada signed a sworn
statement that he "did not obtain Social Security numbers (SSN) or
Taxpayer Identification numbers (TIN) from all of [his]
subcontractors," but that he was trying to collect all the SSNs and
TINs, confirming that his records were incomplete and that he was
required to begin backup withholding as directed in the IRS notices
and the applicable statute and regulation.  He does not dispute the
bankruptcy court's conclusion. Therefore, because the Quezadas had
a duty to withhold, they were required to file Forms 945 for tax
years 2005 through 2008, rendering the tax filings for those years
incomplete.

The bankruptcy court further determined that the Quezadas'
limitations argument is controlled by the United States Supreme
Court's reasoning in Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Lane-Wells Co.,
321 U.S. 219 (1944), because the Quezadas, like Technicraft in
Lane-Wells, were required to file two separate returns and failed
to file one of them. The Supreme Court further notes that Congress
has granted the IRS discretion to prescribe by regulation forms of
returns, the purpose of which is not just to get tax information,
but "also to get it with such uniformity, completeness, and
arrangement that the physical task of handling and verifying
returns may be readily accomplished." In this case, James Quezada
failed to file any Forms 945 along with, or anytime after, he filed
Forms 1040 and 1099 for tax years 2005 through 2008. Thus, no
assessment limitations was triggered with respect to James
Quezada's backup-withholding-tax liability.

The Quezadas argue that the bankruptcy court erred in relying on
Lane-Wells because that case involved a two-level tax issue for
limitations purposes, whereas their case involves only one,
asserting that the consequences of procuring an incorrect TIN from
a payee or collecting incorrect backup withholding is irrelevant to
the calculation of  the Quezadas' deductions for business income
and expenses as provided in the Forms 1040. The district court
disagrees. As noted by the bankruptcy court, the Quezadas claimed
deductions for subcontractor expenses on his income taxes,
requiring him to file Schedule C and Forms 1040 for the tax years
2005 through 2008. By filing his Forms 1040 and 1099, James Quezada
met the first level of his tax liability. However, because the
Forms 1099 were missing the TINs from some of his subcontractors,
the second-level duty to collect backup withholding was triggered,
requiring him to file Forms 945 for tax years 2005 through 2008.
Because he was required, but failed, to conduct backup withholding
and file Forms 945, the statute of limitations was not triggered.
Therefore, the taxes assessed by the IRS in the amount of
$1,269,561.89 are valid, allowed, and non-dischargeable.

A copy of the District Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
Sept. 30, 2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2Wc9k6K from
Leagle.com.

James Quezada and Simona Quezada sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 16-10467) on April 21, 2016.  They are
represented by Carlos Quezada of the Law Offices of Carlos Quezada;
Michael V. Baumer of the Office of Michael Baumer; and Michael Lynn
Cook of Cook Brooks Johnson PLLC.



KAUMANA DRIVE: Seeks to Hire R. Pumphrey as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------
Kaumana Drive Partners, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Hawaii to hire an accountant.

In an application filed in court, the Debtor proposes to employ R.
Pumphrey & Associates, LLC to prepare its monthly operating
reports, and provide bookkeeping and accounting services necessary
to administer its bankruptcy estate.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Robert Pumphrey, CPA                    $195
     Evangeline Pumphrey, Senior Consultant   $75
     Kathy Baxter, Staff Consultant           $55
  
R. Pumphrey neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to
the Debtor's estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert Pumphrey
     R. Pumphrey & Associates, LLC
     20385 Colleen Court
     Strongsville, OH 44149

                   About Kaumana Drive Partners

Kaumana Drive Partners, LLC, owner of a skilled nursing care
facility in Hilo, Hawaii, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Hawaii Case No. 19-01266) on Oct. 6,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets between $10 million and $50 million and liabilities of the
same range.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert J. Faris.  The
Debtor is represented by Choi & Ito, Attorneys at Law, as its legal
counsel.


LAFITTE LLC: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 10% Under Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Lafitte LLC d/b/a Sauvage filed a Disclosure Statement that
describes a Plan that provides for a reorganization of the Debtor's
financial obligations and affairs.

Facing a possible forced cessation or interruption of its
operations as a result of efforts by The Provident Bank to restrain
and/or levy upon the Debtor's operating bank accounts and other
assets in order to satisfy the amounts owed under the judgment, the
Debtor consulted with counsel to discuss the commencement of a
chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.

The Plan proposes to treat claims and interests as follows:

   * The Provident Bank will be paid the full amount of its Allowed
Secured Claim in Class 1 totaling $66,100 (representing the value
of the property serving as its collateral as of the Petition Date)
on the Effective Date and with the balance of any amounts owed by
the Debtor to The Provident Bank being treated as a Class 2 General
Unsecured Claim

   * As to General Unsecured Claims owed $2,069,619.84, the Debtor
will make a first and final Pro Rata Distribution of Cash to each
holder of an Allowed Class 2 General Unsecured Claim in an amount
equal to 10% of its Allowed Claim, on the Effective Date in full
satisfaction of such Claim.

   * The allowed interests of Krystof Zizka (42.5%), Joshua Boissy
(42.5%) and Stephen Werther/DWD-Lafitte, LLC (15%) will be
cancelled on the Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Oct. 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y4gc9kqe from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                       About Lafitte LLC

Based in Brooklyn, New York, Lafitte LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
19-43360) on May 31, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
between $1,000,001 and $10 million.  The case has been assigned to
Judge Elizabeth S. Stong.  Douglas J. Pick, Esq., at Pick & Zabicki
LLP, represents the Debtor.


LAKESHORE FARMS: Hearing on Plan & Disclosures on Nov. 19
---------------------------------------------------------
Following a hearing on Oct. 28, 2019, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Missouri set a status hearing on Lakeshore
farms, Inc.'s Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan for Nov. 19, 2019, at
10:30 a.m.   The Debtor is filing a revised amended plan before the
status hearing.

As reported by Troubled Company Reporter, Lakeshore Farms, Inc.,
filed a Chapter 11 plan that says the Debtor has negotiated a
consensual debt restructure with Frontier Bank.  Under the Plan,
$1,300,000 of the $2,633,749 allowed claim of Frontier Bank is
treated as a Class 4 Secured Claim under the Plan and the
$1,333,748.93 balance is treated as a Class 12 unsecured Claim.
Holders of unsecured claims totaling $2,733,191, including the
$1,233,749 Frontier Bank Unsecured Note, will be paid over seven
years in an annual principal reduction payment equal to 3% of each
claimant's claim beginning on Dec. 15, 2020, and ending on December
15, 2026.  Total payout to the Class 12 claimants under the plan
equals 21% of each class claimant's claim.

A full-text copy of the Fourth Amended Disclosure Statement dated
Oct. 18, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2ztdunz from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                    About Lakeshore Farms

Lakeshore Farms, Inc., is a privately held company in Forest City,
Missouri in the oilseed and grain farming industry.  Lakeshore
Farms filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No.
18-50077) on Feb. 28, 2018.  In the petition signed by Jonathan L.
Russell, president, the Debtor disclosed $8.52 million in total
assets and $5.57 million in total debt.  The case is assigned to
Judge Brian T. Fenimore.  Evans & Mullinix, P.A., is counsel to the
Debtor.


LPL HOLDINGS: Moody's Rates New $1.8MM Secured Loans 'Ba1'
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba1 rating to LPL Holdings,
Inc.'s proposed $1,070 million senior secured term loan due 2026
and $750 million senior secured revolving credit facility due 2024
and B1 rating to LPL's proposed $400 million senior unsecured notes
due 2027. LPL's rating outlook remains unchanged at positive.

Assignments:

Issuer: LPL Holdings, Inc.

Senior Secured Term Loan, Assigned Ba1

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Assigned Ba1

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B1

RATINGS RATIONALE

The ratings assigned to the senior secured bank credit facility is
in the line with the existing Ba1 rating already assigned to LPL's
outstanding senior secured term loan and revolving credit facility.
The rating assigned to the senior unsecured notes is also in line
with the existing B1 rating to LPL's outstanding senior unsecured
debt.

LPL's Ba2 corporate family rating and positive outlook reflect the
firm's increasing profitability, improved debt service capacity and
shift to a more conservative financial policy. In recent years, LPL
has benefited from favorable macroeconomic trends as well as the
successful transition of client assets following its acquisition of
NPH. As the largest independent retail brokerage in the US, LPL
extracts numerous benefits from its large scale, demonstrated by a
consistently positive operating leverage, that will help it weather
market turbulence or a lower interest rate environment. The firm's
financial policy has become more creditor-friendly, with debt
leverage having improved following its 2015 debt-funded shareholder
distributions.

Moody's said that LPL plans to utilize the net proceeds of the
proposed $400 million senior unsecured notes to pay down an
equivalent amount on its existing $1,470 senior secured term loan.
LPL also intends on using the net proceeds of its proposed $1,070
million senior secured term loan to repay the remaining amount
outstanding on the existing term loan. Moody's said that LPL is
also increasing the borrowing capacity under its revolving credit
facility to $750 million from $500 million, mostly to support
working capital and for general corporate purposes. The transaction
will allow the firm to extend the maturity of its borrowings while
reducing its debt servicing cost, both credit positives, said
Moody's.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

  -- Continued shift in financial policy and demonstrated
commitment towards stronger debt leverage

  -- Strengthened cash flow generation that results in the
maintenance of interest coverage above 7.5x and debt leverage under
2.5x on a sustained basis

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

  -- Shift in financial policy that significantly increases debt to
fund shareholder-friendly capital plans

  -- M&A activity outside of LPL's main business focus, or one that
would result in a sustained level of debt leverage above 4x

  -- Significant failure in regulatory compliance or technology

  -- Prolonged revenue decline resulting in weakened pre-tax
earnings and increased margin volatility

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Securities
Industry Service Providers published in June 2018.


LRB REALTY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
LRB Realty LLC, according to the case docket.
    
                         About LRB Realty

LRB Realty, LLC, a privately held company based in Jupiter, Fla.,
sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
19-22206) on Sept. 13, 2019, estimating $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities.  The Hon. Erik P. Kimball oversees
the case.  The Debtor is represented by Brian K. McMahon, Esq.


LUMEE LLC: Seeks to Hire CFO Solutions as Restructuring Advisor
---------------------------------------------------------------
LuMee LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah to hire CFO Solutions LC as its restructuring
advisor.
   
The firm will provide these services in connection with the
Debtor's Chapter 11 case:

     (a) manage the liquidation of the bankruptcy estate;

     (b) prepare financial disclosures;

     (c) prosecute and settle avoidance actions;

     (d) determine, litigate and settle claims;

     (e) formulate a bankruptcy plan; and  

     (f) make distributions to creditors.

The hourly rates for the firm's professionals who are likely to
provide the services are:

           Matt McKinlay      $275
           Tim Donovan        $275
           Mark Jaggi         $275
   
CFO Solutions is "disinterested" within the meaning of Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Matt McKinlay
     CFO Solutions LC
     Phone: (801) 657-4293

                        About LuMee LLC

LuMee LLC -- https://www.lumee.com/ -- designs, manufactures, and
sells illuminated smart phone cases and other mobile accessories.

LuMee filed its petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 19-24752) on June 28,
2019.  In the petition signed by Angela Shoemake, president and
chief operating officer, the Debtor was estimated to have $100,000
to $500,000 in assets and $4.2 million in liabilities.  The case is
assigned to Judge William T. Thurman.  Brian M. Rothschild, Esq.,
at Parsons Behle & Latimer, is the Debtor's counsel.


M-TRANCONSTRUCTION: Mufthiha Sabaratnam Okayed as Ch.11 Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
M-TranConstruction Inc. sought and obtained permission from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California to
employ the Law Offices of Mufthiha Sabaratnam as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

The Firm's attorneys specialize in the practice of bankruptcy law
and reorganization and is well qualified to represent the Debtor
and are familiar with the Debtor and its case.  All attorneys
associated with the Firm who will render services in this case are
duly admitted to practice law in the Courts of the State of
California and in the United States District for the Northern
District.

Mufthiha Sabaratnam will lead the Firm's engagement.  Counsel met
the principal of the Debtor in early August 2019.  At that time,
the Employment Development Department in California had conducted
an audit and was pressuring the Debtor to sign an onerous payment
plan where the interest and penalties alone amounted to $200,000.
Although the Debtor had been represented by another attorney during
the audit, the amounts owed were not reduced even after the Debtor
produced the necessary paperwork.

The Debtor says it could not survive the terms of the payment plan
and after much communication with the EDD a decision was made to
file for protection under Chapter 11.  Counsel requested and
received payment for services rendered in the amount of $1,500 on
August 22, 2019.

Once a decision to file the Chapter 11 was made, counsel requested
and received $5,500 as a deposit for the preparation of Chapter 11
and $2,000 for the filing fee of $1,717 and miscellaneous costs.
Except as stated, Counsel has not represented the Debtor or its
principal or any person related to or connected to the Debtor for
any services. Of the funds received in advance, $200 remains in the
Firm's trust account.

The professional services that Mufthiha Sabaratnam of Law Offices
of Mufthiha Sabaratnam are to render include:

     a. To give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers
and duties as Debtor-In Possession in the continued operation and
management of its property;

     b. To prepare on behalf of the Debtor, as
Debtor-In-Possession, necessary applications, answers, orders,
reports and other legal papers; and

     c. To perform all legal services for the Debtor-In-Possession
which may be necessary and if necessary for the
Debtor-In-Possession to employ an attorney for professional
services.

Counsel expects that compensation will be based upon a combination
of factors, including without limitation:  customary hourly fees of
$375.00 to Ms. Sabaratnam; $250.00 per hour for associate
attorneys; $70.00 per hour for paralegals, in addition to costs and
expenses.

To the best of Firm's knowledge, neither Mufthiha Sabaratnam nor
the Firm holds or represents any interest adverse to the Debtor or
its estate, and Mufthiha Sabaratnam and the Firm are disinterested
persons as that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code. Counsel and the Firm do not represent any entity
having an adverse interest to the Debtor in connection with this
case.

Further, except as otherwise set forth, Counsel and the Firm do not
have any connection with the Debtor, Debtor-In-Possession,
Creditors of the estate, or any party in interest, its respective
attorneys and accountants, the United States Trustee, or any person
employed in the Office of the United States Trustee.  The Firm
holds no interest adverse to the estate.

The firm may be reached at:

     Mufthiha Sabaratnam, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF MUFTHIHA SABARATNAM
     809 Clay Street
     Oakland, CA 94612
     Tel: (510) 205-0986

          - and -

     111 North Market Street, Suite 300
     San Jose, CA 95113
     Tel: (408) 390-0703

M-TranConstruction, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 19-51856) on September 13,
2019, listing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  A
copy of the petition is available at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb19-51856.pdf The Debtor is
represented by Mufthiha Sabaratnam, Esq., at Law Offices of
Mufthiha Sabaratnam.




MACHINE TECH: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Machine Tech, Inc.
        PO Box 960
        Adel, GA 31620

Business Description: Machine Tech Inc. provides sheet metal
                      fabrication & metal stampings services.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Georgia (Valdosta)

Debtor's Counsel: Wesley J. Boyer, Esq.
                  BOYER TERRY LLC
                  348 Cotton Avenue, Ste 200
                  Macon, GA 31201
                  Tel: 478-742-6481
                  E-mail: wes@boyerterry.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Joseph A. Bell, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb19-71340.pdf


MAISON PREMIERE: Unsecureds to Recover 10% Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------
Maison Premiere Corp., is proposing a Reorganization Plan that
provides for a reorganization of the Debtor’s financial
obligations and affairs.

Facing a possible forced cessation or interruption of its
operations as a result of efforts by The Provident Bank to restrain
and/or levy upon the Debtor's operating bank accounts and other
assets in order to satisfy the amounts owed under the judgment, the
Debtor consulted with counsel to discuss the commencement of a
chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding.

According to the Disclosure Statement, the Plan proposes to treat
claims and interests as follows:

   * Class 3 - General Unsecured Claims.  IMPAIRED.  $2,384,160.86.
The Debtor will make a first and final Pro Rata Distribution of
Cash to each holder of an Allowed Class 3 General Unsecured Claim
in an amount equal to 10% of its Allowed Claim, on the Effective
Date in full satisfaction of such Claim.

   * Class 4 - Interests.  IMPAIRED.  Under the Plan, said
Interests will be cancelled on the Effective Date.

The Debtor anticipates that such all sums needed to fund said
Distributions will be in escrow with the Disbursing Agent on the
Effective Date. All post-Confirmation payments contemplated under
the Plan shall be made by the Reorganized Debtor from its future
earnings.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 21,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxuqvp7e from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                   About Maison Premiere Corp.

Maison Premiere Corp., owner of Williamsburg oyster bar Maison
Premiere, and Lafitte LLC, owner of French restaurant Sauvage,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case Nos.
19-43359 and 19-43360) on May 31, 2019.

Maison Premiere -- https://maisonpremiere.com/ -- owns and operates
an oyster bar, cocktail den & seafood restaurant in Brooklyn, New
York.  Sauvage -- https://sauvageny.com/ -- is a restaurant in
Greenpoint, New York, that serves breakfast, lunch, dinner, brunch,
wines, cocktails, and desserts.

The Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong is the case judge.

PICK & ZABICKI LLP is the Debtors' counsel.



MARQUIS ENTERPRISES: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Oct. 30, 2019, disclosed in a
court filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has
been appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Marquis Enterprises, LLC.

                     About Marquis Enterprises

Marquis Enterprises, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-11978) on Sept. 25,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
estimated assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities
of less than $50,000.  The case is assigned to Judge Carl L. Bucki.
The Debtor is represented by James M. Joyce, Esq.


MCL NURSING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: MCL Nursing, LLC
          d/b/a McLoud Nursing Center
        455 East Paces Ferry Road, Suite 302
        Atlanta, GA 30305

Business Description: MCL Nursing, LLC LC owns and operates a
                      skilled nursing facility in McLoud,
                      Oklahoma.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)

Case No.: 19-67513

Debtor's Counsel: Theodore N. Stapleton, Esq.
                  THEODORE N. STAPLETON, P.C.
                  Suite 100-B
                  2802 Paces Ferry Road
                  Atlanta, GA 30339
                  Tel: (678) 361-6211
                       (770) 436-3334
                  Fax: (404) 935-5344
                  E-mail: tstaple@tstaple.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Christopher F. Brogdon, manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-67513.pdf


MORAN FOODS: Moody's Lowers CFR to Caa3, Outlook Negative
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded the Corporate Family Rating
and Probability of Default Rating of Moran Foods LLC, the parent of
Save-A-Lot Holdings, LLC. to Caa3 and Caa3-PD from Caa1 and Caa1-PD
respectively. Moody's also downgraded the rating of the company's
senior secured term loan to Ca from Caa2. The outlook is negative.

"The company's operating performance continues to be lackluster as
management initiatives to improve revenue and profits are taking
longer to gain traction in the increasingly competitive hard
discount grocery space", Moody's Vice President Mickey Chadha
stated. "Therefore, Moody's expects operating margins to remain
very thin and credit metrics in the next 12 months. The company's
overall liquidity is weak as Moody's expects it will burn a
significant amount of cash in the next 12 months which will
necessitate borrowing under its revolving credit facility to fund
capital expenditures and operations and in the absence of
operational improvement, the company will have difficulty meeting
its fixed obligation in 2020", Chadha further stated.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Moran Foods LLC

  Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Caa3-PD from
  Caa1-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa3 from Caa1

  Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to Ca (LGD4)
  from Caa2 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Moran Foods LLC

  Outlook, Remains Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

The company's Caa3 Corporate Family Rating reflects its weak
liquidity and credit metrics with lease adjusted debt/EBITDA
expected to be over 15x in the next 12 months. Moody's expects
metrics to improve only modestly for fiscal 2020 as competitive
pressures are not expected to abate and margins and topline growth
is expected to remain pressured. With about 1,155 stores including
698 licensed stores, Save-A-Lot is the second largest hard discount
grocery store operator in the U.S. behind Aldi, which plans to
aggressively expand its store base across the U.S. New entrants
like Lidl into the U.S. hard discount grocery market could also
create additional competitive pressure on Save-A-Lot in the longer
term. Save-A-Lot's total network same store sales have declined
5.1% for the first half of 2019 and Moody's expects same store
sales for the second half of the year will continue their downward
trajectory primarily due to lower purchases from its licensees.
Pricing pressure continues to be intense and the company has
lowered prices network wide primarily funded by expected cost of
goods savings. However, profitability has not improved
significantly. Management has launched a number of new initiatives
to improve operating performance including price investments, SKU
rationalization, increased focus on customer experience, warehouse
optimization, improving managerial talent at the regional level,
renegotiating vendor terms, modernizing assortment and investing in
the store base. Although these initiatives are a step in the right
direction, execution risk is high and success is uncertain. The
longer it takes for these initiatives to show tangible results, the
more strain there will be on the company's liquidity and capital
resources. The company's overall liquidity is weak as Moody's
expects it will burn a significant amount of cash in the next 12
months which will necessitate borrowing under its revolving credit
facility to fund capital expenditures and operations.

Although Save-A-Lot's licensee store base enables capital efficient
growth while leveraging its distribution network and purchasing
scale, the lack of centralized control to ensure uniformly
competitive pricing at the licensee stores has the potential of
eroding customers perception of Save-A-Lot being a low price
alternative. Moody's continues to believe that the hard discount
food retail sector is well positioned for growth relative to other
retail channels given its low price points and relative resistance
to economic cycles and e-commerce albeit still in a very highly
competitive operating environment.

The negative ratings outlook reflects the competitive environment
that is getting tougher with very little pricing power for
Save-A-Lot in light of the pricing pressure permeating throughout
the supermarket sector and the aggressive expansion by Aldi.
Although the company has undertaken a significant transformation
plan since being acquired at the end of 2016, management
initiatives have not demonstrated much traction and their success
is uncertain at this time.

Given the negative outlook an upgrade is unlikely in the near term.
In the longer term ratings could be upgraded if same store sales
turn positive, operating margins stabilize and liquidity is
adequate. Quantitatively ratings could be upgraded if debt/EBITDA
and EBIT to interest demonstrate sustained improvement.

Ratings could be downgraded if the company's cash flow and
liquidity does not improve, same store sales growth and operating
margins continue to deteriorate or financial policies become
aggressive. Ratings could also be downgraded if company's revolving
credit facility is not refinanced well in advance of its maturity
or debt/EBITDA is sustained above 10x or EBIT/interest does not
demonstrate sustained improvement towards 1.0x.

Save-A-Lot is a hard discount grocery store operator with 1,155
stores of which 698 are operated by licensees. The company is owned
by Onex partners. LTM revenues totaled approximately $3.9 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.


MORIAH POWDER: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Moriah Powder River, LLC
        7900 East Union, Suite 1100
        Denver, CO 80237

Business Description: Moriah Powder River, LLC is a privately held
                      company in Denver, Colorado.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 31, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Wyoming (Cheyenne)

Case No.: 19-20699

Judge: Hon. Cathleen D. Parker

Debtor's Counsel: Bradley T. Hunsicker, Esq.
                  MARKUS WILLIAMS YOUNG & HUNSICKER LLC
                  106 East Lincolnway, Suite 300
                  Cheyenne, WY 82001
                  Tel: 307-778-8178
                  Fax: 307-778-8953
                  E-smail: bhunsicker@markuswilliams.com

Estimated Assets: $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petition was signed by Craig Camozzi, chief operating officer.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/wyb19-20699.pdf


MOTIVA PERFORMANCE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Motiva Performance Engineering, LLC
        1720 Lousiana Blvd. NE Suite 100
        Albuquerque, NM 87110

Business Description: Motiva Performance Engineering, LLC owns and

                      operates an automotive performance, repair
                      and dynamometer facility in Albuquerque, New
                      Mexico.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of New Mexico (Albuquerque)

Case No.: 19-12539

Judge: Hon. David T. Thuma

Debtor's Counsel: Chris W. Pierce, Esq.
                  WALKER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
                  500 Marquette N.W., Suite 650
                  Albuquerque, NM 87102
                  Tel: 505-766-9272
                  Fax: 505-766-9287
                  E-mail: cpierce@walkerlawpc.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by David Rochau, authorized
representative.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nmb19-12539.pdf


NEAL ELECTRIC: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Oct. 30, 2019, disclosed in a
court filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has
been appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Neal Electric, Inc.

                   About Neal Electric Inc.

Based in Mcdonough, Georgia, Neal Electric Inc. filed a voluntary
petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Case No. 19-65232) on Sept. 26, 2019, estimating under $1 million
in both assets and liabilities.  Joseph Chad Brannen at The Brannen
Firm, LLC is the Debtor's counsel.


NEW BETHEL: Seeks to Hire Crowley Liberatore as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
New Bethel Baptist Church seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to employ Crowley
Liberatore P.C., as counsel to the Debtor.

New Bethel requires Crowley Liberatore to:

   a. prepare the petition, lists, schedules and statements
      required by the Bankruptcy Code; the pleadings, motions,
      notices and orders required for the orderly administration
      of the estate and to ensure the progress of this case; and
      to consult with and advise the Debtor in the reorganization
      of its financial affairs;

   b. prepare for, prosecute, defend, and represent the Debtor's
      interest in all contested matters, adversary proceedings,
      and other motions and applications arising under, arising
      in, or related to this case;

   c. advise and consult concerning administration of the estate
      in this case, concerning the rights and remedies with
      regard to the Debtor's assets; concerning the claims of
      administrative, secured, priority, and unsecured creditors
      and other parties in interest;

   d. investigate the existence of other assets of the estate;
      and, if any exist, to take appropriate action to have the
      same turned over to the estate, including instituting
      lawsuits and investigating whether lawsuits exist; and

   e. prepare a Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization
      for the Debtor, and negotiate with all creditors and
      parties in interest who may be affected thereby; to obtain
      confirmation of a Plan, and perform all acts reasonably
      calculated to permit the Debtor to perform such acts and
      consummate a Plan.

Crowley Liberatore will be paid based upon its normal and usual
hourly billing rates.

Crowley Liberatore has been paid by the Debtor a total of $7,439.50
for pre-petition work performed for the Debtor relating to the
bankruptcy case, and the $1,717 filing fee. Crowley Liberatore
continues to hold an additional $2,560.50 retainer.
Crowley Liberatore will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Joseph T. Liberatore, Esq., a partner at Crowley Liberatore P.C.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Crowley Liberatore can be reached at:

     Joseph T. Liberatore, Esq.
     Nathaniel Y. Scott, Esq.
     CROWLEY LIBERATORE P.C.
     150 Boush Street
     Norfolk, VA 23510
     Tel: (757) 333-4500
     Fax: (757) 333-4501

                 About New Bethel Baptist Church

New Bethel Baptist Church is an unincorporated religious
association pursuant to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of
Virginia.

New Bethel Baptist Church, based in Portsmouth, VA, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-73531) on Sept. 24, 2019.
In the petition signed by Melinda L. Starkley, chairman of the
trustees, the Debtor disclosed $1,449,207 in assets and $4,034,673
in liabilities.  The Hon. Frank J. Santoro oversees the case.
Joseph T. Liberatore, Esq., at Crowley Liberatore P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


NEW ENGLAND MOTOR: Has Committee-Backed Liquidating Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
New England Motor Freight, Inc, et al. and their Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors filed a Joint Combined Plan Of Liquidation
and Disclosure Statement.

Prior to the Petition Date, several factors severely impacted the
profitability of the Debtors' businesses, ultimately prompting the
liquidity crisis that dictated the Debtors' decision to commence
the Chapter 11 Cases in order to conduct an orderly liquidation of
their assets.  While he Debtors’ operations were profitable for
decades since the current ownership group acquired EMF in 1977, the
Debtors suffered a downward trend over recent years, which was
exacerbated in late 2018 by the unexpected loss of key accounts,
the shortage of drivers, a new Union contract with onerous
retroactive terms, and the L/C Lenders' ultimate unwillingness to
restructure the Debtors’ letters of credit obligations under
terms acceptable to the Debtors.

Under the Plan, Each Holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim
will receive a Beneficial Interest that entitles it to its pro rata
share (in proportion to each Holder's Allowed Claim to aggregate
amount of Allowed Claims in Class 5D) of the Liquidating Trust
Assets available for Distribution.  Equity Interests in each of the
Consolidated NEMF and Eastern Debtors shall be deemed to be
cancelled and holders of these interests will receive no
distributions.

The Plan shall be funded by (i) available Cash and other available
Estate Assets on the Effective Date, and (ii) funds available after
the Effective Date from, among other things, the liquidation of the
Liquidating Trust Assets, including the prosecution and resolution
of Causes of Action.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 21,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/yxckxdhn from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors:

     Mary E. Seymour
     Joseph J. DiPasquale
     LOWENSTEIN SANDLER LLP
     One Lowenstein Drive
     Roseland, NJ 07068
     Telephone: (973) 597-2500
     Facsimile: (973) 597-2400
     E-mail: mseymour@lowenstein.com
             jdipasquale@lowenstein.com

            - and -

     Rafael X. Zahralddin-Aravena
     Jonathan M. Stemerman
     Sarah Denis
     ELLIOTT GREENLEAF, P.C.
     1105 North Market Street, Suite 1700
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Telephone: (302) 384-9400
     Facsimile: (302) 384-9399
     E-mail: rxza@elliottgreenleaf.com
             jms@elliottgreenleaf.com
             sxd@elliottgreenleaf.com

                About New England Motor Freight

New England Motor Freight, Inc. -- http://www.nemf.com/-- provides
less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier services in the United States and
Canada.  Founded in 1977, the company is based in Elizabeth, N.J.,
and has terminals in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic.

New England Motor Freight and its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case
No. 19-12809) on Feb. 11, 2019.  At the time of the filing, New
England Motor estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and
liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge John K. Sherwood.

The Debtors tapped Gibbons P.C. as legal counsel; Whiteford, Taylor
& Preston, LLP as special counsel; Phoenix Executive Services, LLC,
as restructuring advisor; and Donlin Recano as claims agent.

The Office of the U.S. trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on
Feb. 21, 2019.  The committee tapped Lowenstein Sandler LLP and
Elliott Greenleaf as its legal counsel.


NH HIGHWAY HOTEL: Seeks to Hire Ford McDonald as Attorney
---------------------------------------------------------
NH Highway Hotel Group, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire to employ Ford
McDonald McPartlin & Borden, P.A., as attorney to the Debtor.

NH Highway Hotel requires Ford McDonald to:

   a. advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
      Debtor-in-possession;

   b. represent the Debtor at hearings and matters pertaining to
      its affairs as Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession;

   c. attend meetings and negotiating with representatives of the
      Debtor's creditors and other parties-in-interest, as well
      as responding to creditors inquiries;

   d. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
      Debtor's estate;

   e. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary and
      appropriate motions, applications, answers, orders, reports
      and papers necessary to the administration of the estate;

   f. review applications and motions filed in connection with
      this case;

   g. negotiate and prepare on the Debtor's behalf a plan of
      reorganization, disclosure statement, and all related
      agreements and documents, and taking any necessary action
      on behalf of the Debtor to obtain confirmation of such
      plan;

   h. advise the Debtor in connection with any potential sale of
      assets or business, or in connection with any strategic
      planning;

   i. review and evaluate the Debtor's executory contracts and
      unexpired leases, and representing the Debtor in connection
      with the rejection, assumption, or assignment of such
      leases;

   j. consult with and advise the Debtor regarding labor and
      employment matters;

   k. represent the Debtor in connection with any adversary
      proceedings or automatic stay litigation which may be
      commenced by or against the Debtor;

   l. review and analyze various claims of the Debtor's creditors
      and the treatment of such claims, and preparing, filing or
      prosecute any objections thereto; and

   m. perform other necessary legal services and providing other
      necessary legal advice to the Debtor in connection with
      the Chapter 11 case.

Ford McDonald will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.  The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Richard K. McPartlin, a partner at Ford McDonald McPartlin, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Ford McDonald can be reached at:

     Richard K. McPartlin, Esq.
     FORD MCDONALD MCPARTLIN & BORDEN, P.A.
     10 Pleasant Street, Suite 400
     Portsmouth, NH 03801
     Tel: (603) 373-1600
     Fax: (603) 242-1381
     E-mail: rmcpartlin@fordlaw.com

              About NH Highway Hotel Group, LLC

NH Highway Hotel Group, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.N.H. Case No. 19-11303) on Sept. 19, 2019, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Richard K. McPartlin, at Ford McDonald McPartlin &
Borden, P.A.



NORVIEW BUILDERS: Frenzel Okayed as Real Estate Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Norview Builders, Inc. sought and obtained approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois to employ
Nicholas Frenzel and Frenzel Law LLC as its real estate counsel.

The Debtor has been authorized to sell a parcel of real estate and,
to ensure that the transaction closes, it has decided to retain
Frenzel as real estate counsel.

The Debtor requires counsel to represent it and its bankruptcy
estate in the pending sale of real estate known as 24205 W.
Lockport St., Plainfield, IL 60544 to NWB Plainfield Real-Estate
LLC.  Frenzel specializes in real estate law and its professionals
have experience representing sellers and other parties in interest
in commercial real estate transactions.  Thus, Frenzel is well
suited to serve as one of the Debtor's real estate counsel, the
Debtor says.

The Debtor has agreed to pay a flat fee of $2,500 to Frenzel, to be
paid out of closing. Frenzel has not received any other
compensation from the Debtor related to this transaction or any
other person either prior to or during the case. Frenzel is not a
creditor in the case.

The Debtor believes Frenzel does not hold or represent an interest
adverse to the Debtor or the Estate, and that it is a disinterested
person within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

                  About Norview Builders

Norview Builders, Inc., based in Oak Lawn, Ill., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-01825) on Jan. 22, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Brenda P. O'Sullivan, president, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and $500,000 to $1
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Jacqueline P. Cox oversees the
case.  Gregory K. Stern, Esq., at Gregory K. Stern, P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


NULIFE MULHOLLAND: Seeks to Hire Robert M. Yaspan as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Nulife Mulholland, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to employ the Law Firm
of Robert M. Yaspan, as general bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.

Nulife Mulholland requires Robert M. Yaspan to:

   a. negotiate with the creditors of the Debtor;

   b. assist the Debtor with the negotiation, confirmation, and
      implementation of the Debtor's Plan of Reorganization under
      Chapter 11;

   c. prepare the Schedule of Current Income and Current
      Expenses, Statement of Financial Affairs, Statement of All
      Liabilities of the Debtor, and Statement of All Property of
      the Debtor;

   d. prepare pleadings, attend at Court hearings and work with
      the various parties interested in the bankruptcy case;

   e. give the Debtor legal advice with respect to the powers and
      duties as Debtor-in-Possession in the continued operation
      of the management of the property;

   f. prepare on behalf of the Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession
      necessary applications, answers, orders, reports, and other
      legal papers; and

   g. perform all other legal services for the Debtor, which may
      be necessary.

Robert M. Yaspan will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys            $475 to $595
     Paralegals           $110 to $250

Prior to the petition date, Robert M. Yaspan received from the
Debtor the amount of $26,842, including the filing fee.

Robert M. Yaspan will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Robert M. Yaspan, partner of the Law Firm of Robert M. Yaspan,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Robert M. Yaspan can be reached at:

     Robert M. Yaspan, Esq.
     LAW FIRM OF ROBERT M. YASPAN
     21700 Oxnard Street, Suite 1750
     Woodland Hills, CA 91367
     Tel: (818) 774-9929
     Fax: (818) 774-9989

                About Nulife Mulholland LLC

NuLife Mulholland LLC owns and operates an addiction treatment
center in California. The Company owns in fee simple 11.2 acres
with 7400 square foot house and 800 square foot guest house located
in Calabasas, California having an appraised value of $7 million.
The Company also owns in fee simple a two-acre lot with small
vineyard valued at $750,000.

NuLife sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-12407) on Sept. 24, 2019. In the
petition signed by its managing member, John D. Meints, Jr., the
Debtor disclosed $8,028,177 in assets and $5,180,697 in debt.
Judge Martin R. Barash is assigned to the case.  The Law Offices of
Robert M. Yaspan serves as the Debtor's counsel.


OAK LAKE LLC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Oak Lake, LLC
           d/b/a Grand Lake Villa
        455 East Paces Ferry Road, Suite 302
        Atlanta, GA 30305

Business Description: Oak Lake LLC owns and operates a skilled
                      nursing care facility in Grove, Oklahoma.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)

Case No.: 19-67517

Debtor's Counsel: Theodore N. Stapleton, Esq.
                  THEODORE N. STAPLETON, P.C.
                  Suite 100-B
                  2802 Paces Ferry Road
                  Atlanta, GA 30339
                  Tel: (678) 361-6211
                       (770) 436-3334
                  Fax: (404) 935-5344
                  E-mail: tstaple@tstaple.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Christopher F. Brogdon, manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb19-67517.pdf


PALM COAST CAPITAL: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
Palm Coast Capital Investment, according to the case docket.
    
             About Palm Coast Capital Investment Group

Palm Coast Capital Investment Group, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
19-22837)) on Sept. 26, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
less than $50,000.  The case is assigned to Judge Mindy A. Mora.
The Debtor is represented by Brian K. McMahon, P.A.


PAPARDELLE 1068: May Employ Cohen Baldinger as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Papardelle 1068, Inc. filed an application to employ Steven H.
Greenfeld and Cohen Baldinger & Greenfeld, LLC as counsel to
represent it as a debtor-in-possession. On Sept. 9, 2019, the
bankruptcy court denied that application because it did not
disclose certain connections of the attorneys, including
connections to the owners of the debtor and to other entities owned
by those owners such as Rotini, Inc., connections that ought to
have been disclosed as required by Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure Rule 2014(a). The court's order noted that the court
"does not address whether it would grant or deny a new application
disclosing all connections of the law firm with the debtor."

On Sept. 13, 2019, the debtor filed a motion for reconsideration.
The motion includes a verified statement of Greenfeld which the
motion represents discloses relevant connections as required by
Rule 2014(a). The verified statement reflects the attorneys' prior
representation of Rotini, Inc. The District of Columbia has opposed
the motion for reconsideration, pointing to both the connections
not disclosed in the original application to employ and the failure
of the attorneys to disclose that they hold an unsecured claim
against Rotini, Inc.

Bankruptcy Judge S. Martin Teel, Jr. orders that the motion for
reconsideration is denied to the extent it requests the court to
vacate the order denying the application of employment filed on
August 19, 2019. The Court, however, orders that treating the
motion for reconsideration as a new application to employ the
attorneys, the new application is granted and the debtor is
authorized to employ Steven H. Greenfeld and Cohen Baldinger &
Greenfeld, LLC as attorneys to represent it as a
debtor-in-possession.

The failure to make required disclosures of connections in the
application filed on August 19, 2019, warrants not granting that
application, Judge Teel explains. The connections ought to have
been uncovered by a diligent investigation and ought to have been
disclosed even if they could be viewed as having occurred quite
some time prior to this case. There was no error in the court's
decision to deny the application, and reconsideration of the ruling
on the application filed on August 19, 2019, is not warranted.

However, the motion for reconsideration is in effect a new
application to employ counsel, making disclosure of connections as
required by Rule 2014(a). The Court deems it appropriate to treat
the motion for reconsideration as a new application. Treated as a
new application, it satisfies the Court that the debtor has
complied with Rule 2014(a) in disclosing required connections and
that there are no disqualifying connections warranting denying the
employment of counsel.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated Sept. 30,
2019 is available at https://bit.ly/342Jsg5 from Leagle.com.

Papardelle 1068, Inc. filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.C. Case No. 19-00554) on August 16, 2019, and is
represented by Steven H. Greenfeld, Esq. --
steveng@cohenbaldinger.com -- at Cohen, Baldinger & Greenfeld LLC.


PAPPY'S TRUCKS: Case Summary & 7 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Pappy's Trucks Ltd.
        PO Box 307
        Scurry, TX 75158

Business Description: Pappy's Trucks Ltd. is a freight shipping
                      and trucking company.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 31, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Texas (Dallas)

Case No.: 19-33605

Judge: Hon. Stacey G. Jernigan

Debtor's Counsel: Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
                  JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
                  12720 Hillcrest Road, Suite 625
                  Dallas, TX 75230
                  Tel: (972) 503-4033
                  Fax: (972) 503-4034
                  E-mail: joyce@joycelindauer.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Bryan Huddleston, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of seven unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-33605_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb19-33605.pdf


PAYLESS HOLDINGS: Unsecured Creditors to Split $13.5M in Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Payless Holdings LLC and 26 of its debtor affiliates' Second
Amended joint plan of reorganization proposes to treat claims and
interests as follows:

   * Class 3 Tranche A-1 Term Loan Secured Claims. IMPAIRED. Each
Holder of an Allowed Tranche A-1 Term Loan Secured Claim shall
receive, in full satisfaction, settlement, release and discharge
of, and in exchange for such Tranche A-1 Term Loan Secured Claim,
its pro rata share of $68,800,000 in Cash.

   * Class 4 Tranche A-2 Term Loan Secured Claims. IMPAIRED. Each
Holder of a Tranche A-2 Term Loan Secured Claim shall receive its
pro rata share of 100% of the New Common Units, unless such Holder
exercises the Cash Election at the time of voting on the Plan.

   * Class 5A General Unsecured Claims of Payless ShoeSource
Worldwide, Inc. and Collective Brands Logistics Limited. IMPAIRED.
Each Holder of any such Claim shall receive its pro rata share of
$8.4 million plus its pro rata share of any unused portion of the
Liquidating Trust Fee and Expense Cap of the Liquidating Trust
Distributable Assets.

   * Class 5B General Unsecured Claims of Remaining Debtors.
IMPAIRED.  Each Holder of such Claim shall receive its pro rata
share of $5.1 million, less the Canadian GUC Amount, plus its pro
rata share of any unused portion of the Liquidating Trust Fee and
Expense Cap of the Liquidating Trust Distributable Assets.

   * Class 6 Intercompany Claims. IMPAIRED. Each Intercompany Claim
shall either be (a) reinstated as of the Effective Date or (b)
cancelled, in which case no distribution shall be made on account
of such Intercompany Claim, in each case as determined by the
Debtors and the Requisite Lender Plan Support Parties.

   * Class 7 Existing Equity Interests. IMPAIRED. All Existing
Equity Interests in Payless Holdings LLC, whether represented by
stock, preferred share purchase rights, warrants, options,
membership units or otherwise, will be cancelled, released, and
extinguished and the Holders of such Existing Equity Interests will
receive no distribution under the Plan on account thereof.

   * Class 8 Intercompany Interests. IMPAIRED. Each Intercompany
Interest shall either be (a) reinstated as of the Effective Date or
(b) cancelled, in which case no distribution shall be made on
account of such Intercompany Interest, in each case as determined
by the Debtors and the Requisite Lender Plan Support Parties.

The Cash necessary for the Reorganized Debtors to make Cash
payments required pursuant to the Plan will be funded from three
sources: (1) proceeds from the New First Lien Facility and New
Second Lien Facility; (2) Cash on hand as of the Effective Date;
and (3) Cash from the Axar Cash Election Payment and any other Cash
to be paid by the Axar Entities and the Alden Entities under the
Cash Election Commitment Agreement.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization
dated Oct. 21, 2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y36jd76v
from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                    About Payless Holdings

Payless -- http://www.payless.com/-- was founded in 1956 as an
everyday footwear retailer.  It has more than 4,000 stores in more
than 30 countries, and employs approximately 22,000 people.  It is
headquartered in Topeka, Kansas, but its operations span across
Asia, the Middle East, Latin America, Europe, and the United
States.

Payless first traded publicly in 1962, and was taken private in May
2012.  Payless Holdings, LLC currently owns, directly or
indirectly, each of its 91 subsidiaries.

Payless Holdings LLC (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case No. 17-42267) and its
subsidiaries sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code on April 4, 2017.  In the petitions signed by CEO Paul J.
Jones, the Debtors were estimated to have assets at $500 million to
$1 billion and liabilities at $1 billion to $10 billion.  

The Debtors hired Guggenheim Securities LLC as financial advisor
and investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC as
restructuring advisor; Prime Clerk LLC as claims, balloting and
administrative agent; and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP as CCAA
counsel.

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP serves as counsel in the CCAA
proceedings while Seward & Kissel LLP serves as counsel for the
Debtors' independent managers.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed seven creditors to serve
on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11
cases.  The Committee retained Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as
lead counsel, Province, Inc., as financial advisor, and Back Bay
Management Corporation and its division, The Michel-Shaked Group,
as expert consultant and Dr. Israel Shaked as expert witness.


PEARL GROUP: Seeks to Hire Bedi Legal as Attorney
-------------------------------------------------
The Pearl Group, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to employ Bedi Legal,
P.C., as attorney to the Debtor.

Pearl Group requires Bedi Legal to:

   a. prepare the petition, lists, schedules, and statements
      required by the Bankruptcy Code; the pleadings, motions,
      notices, and orders required for the orderly administration
      of the estate and to ensure the progress of this case; and
      to consult with and advise the Debtor in the reorganization
      of its businesses and the orderly administration of their
      assets;

   b. prepare for, prosecute, defend, and represent the Debtor's
      interest in all contested matters, adversary proceedings,
      and other motions and applications arising under, arising
      in, or related to this case;

   c. advise and consult concerning administration of the estate
      in the bankruptcy case, concerning the rights and remedies
      with regard to the Debtor's assets; concerning the claims
      of administrative, secured, priority, and unsecured
      creditors and other parties in interest;

   d. investigate the existence of other assets of the estate;
      and, if any exist, to take appropriate action to have the
      same turned over to the estate, including instituting
      lawsuits and investigating whether lawsuits exist;

   e. prepare a Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization
      for the Debtor, and negotiate with all creditors and
      parties in interest who may be affected thereby; to
      obtain confirmation of a Plan, and perform all acts
      reasonably calculated to permit the Debtor to perform such
      acts and consummate a plan.

Bedi Legal will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.

Bedi Legal has been paid by the Debtor the amount of $2,000 by the
sole shareholder Lloyd Renwick, of which $283 was applied to
services rendered to the Debtor at the initial consultation prior
to the filing of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and $1,717 was used to
pay the Chapter 11 filing fee.

Bedi Legal will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

John E. Bedi, partner of Bedi Legal, P.C., assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Bedi Legal can be reached at:

     John E. Bedi, Esq.
     BEDI LEGAL, P.C.
     501 Independence Pkwy., Ste. 102
     Chesapeake, VA 23320
     Tel: (757) 497-9075

                     About The Pearl Group

The Pearl Group, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 19-73484) on September 19, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The
Debtor is represented by John E. Bedi, partner of Bedi Legal, P.C.


PES HOLDINGS: Nooter Files Limited Objection to Disc. Statement
---------------------------------------------------------------
Nooter Construction Company filed a limited objection to the
Debtors' Corrected Disclosure Statement for the Joint Chapter 11
Plan of PES Holdings, LLC and its debtor affiliates.

On Aug. 14, 2019, Nooter filed a limited objection to the DIP
Motion because (i) the Debtors were seeking to prime or otherwise
alter Nooter's liens without providing Nooter with adequate
protection, (ii) the Debtors were seeking to subject Nooter to a
deadline to challenge the postpetition lender's lien, and (iii) the
Debtors were attempting to waive Nooter's rights under the doctrine
of marshaling.

On Aug. 18, 2019, Nooter filed a Notice of Perfection of Mechanics
Lien pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 546(b) in which Nooter asserted
that pursuant to applicable non-bankruptcy law, it is entitled to a
lien on the Property in the amount of $463,516.96, plus interest at
the highest rate allowed by law, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees
and all other costs and expenses incurred by Nooter.

According to Nooter, nowhere in the Plan or Disclosure Statement
have the Debtors stated the total amount of the Other Secured
Claims or the amount of Other Secured Claims Reserve Amount to be
funded by the Debtors on the Effective Date.  Nor have the Debtors
stated anywhere in the Plan or Disclosure Statement the amount of
interest to be received by Holders of Other Secured Claims.

Counsel to Nooter Construction Company:

     Jeffrey R. Waxman
     MORRIS JAMES LLP
     500 Delaware Ave., Suite 1500
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Telephone: (302) 888-6800
     E-mail: jwaxman@morrisjames.com

              - and -

     Jeremy Brummond
     LEWIS RICE
     600 Washington Avenue, Suite 2500
     St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1311
     Telephone: 314.444.1339
     E-mail: jbrummond@lewisrice.com

As reported in the TCR, the Debtors have created a transaction
structure and process that they believe will preserve  and
capitalize on the value inherent in their business.  Specifically,
the Debtors are proposing a chapter 11 plan that includes a "sale
toggle" feature contemplating either (a) a plan reorganization
through which the Debtors’
secured debt would be equitized or (b) the sale of the Debtors'
assets pursuant to a Court-approved auction process.  Through the
Plan, the Debtors will, among other things, consummate one of the
two alternative and mutually exclusive transactions to maximize the
value of the estate, ultimately effectuating the option that offers
the best returns for the allowed claims.

A full-text copy of the Motion dated October 10, 2019, is available
at https://tinyurl.com/y52auwj3 from PacerMonitor.com at no
charge.

                      About PES Holdings

Headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PES Holdings LLC and
its subsidiaries are owners and operators of oil refining complex
and have been continuously operating in some form for over 150
years.

PES Energy Inc. is the indirect parent company of Philadelphia
Energy Solutions Refining and Marketing LLC (PESRM).  PESRM owns
and operates the Point Breeze and Girard Point oil refineries
located on an integrated, 1,300-acre refining complex in
Philadelphia.

On Jan. 21, 2018, the Debtors filed petitions for relief under the
Bankruptcy Code, and emerged from bankruptcy in August the same
year.

On June 21, 2019, the Debtors suffered a historic, large-scale,
catastrophic incident involving an explosion at the alkylation unit
at their Girard Point refining facility. Following the incident,
the refinery has not been operational and will require an
extensive
rebuild.

As a result of the explosion, PES Holdings, LLC, along with seven
subsidiaries, including PES Energy, returned to Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11626) on July 21,
2019.

PES Holdings was estimated to have $1 billion to $10 billion in
assets and the same range of liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local bankruptcy
counsel; PJT Partners LP as financial advisor; and Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC, as restructuring advisor.  Omni Management
Group, Inc., is the notice and claims agent.

The Company's proposed DIP financing lenders are represented by
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.  The
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors formed in the case has
retained Conway MacKenzie, Inc., as financial advisor, Elliott
Greenleaf, P.C., as Delaware counsel, and Brown Rudnick LLP as
bankruptcy counsel.


PITBULL REALTY: Seeks to Hire Victor W. Dahar as Attorney
---------------------------------------------------------
Pitbull Realty Group, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire to employ Victor
W. Dahar, P.A., as attorney to the Debtor.

Pitbull Realty requires Victor W. Dahar to:

   a. prepare of the plan and disclosure statement;

   b. prepare of motions for relief and post-petition/take-out
      financing issues;

   c. prepare of objections to motions for relief and pending
      issues;

   d. provide assumption/rejection of executory contracts;

   e. represent for turnover, fraudulent transfer, preference
      actions and other avoidance and subordination actions;

   f. provide motions to Sell Real Estate and other litigation;

   g. negotiate with the creditors committee, if any, and
      creditors, as necessary; and

   h. provide all other matters necessary and proper for the
      representation of the Debtor in the bankruptcy case.

Victor W. Dahar will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Eleanor Wm. Dahar, partner of Victor W. Dahar, P.A., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Victor W. Dahar can be reached at:

     Eleanor Wm. Dahar, Esq.
     VICTOR W. DAHAR, P.A.
     20 Merrimack Street
     Manchester, NH 03101
     Tel: (603) 622-6595

                   About Pitbull Realty Group

Pitbull Realty Group, Inc. is a limited liability company engaged
in single asset real estate, with principal place of business at
373 South Willow Street, Manchester, New Hampshire.  Pitbull Realty
Group Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.H. Case No.
19-10923) on June 28, 2019.  The Debtor was estimated to have less
than $1 million in assets and/or liabilities. WILLIAM S. GANNON
PLLC is the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor hired Victor W. Dahar,
P.A., as attorney.


PROTECH METAL: Seeks to Hire Dunham Hildebrand as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Protech Metal Finishing, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to employ
Dunham Hildebrand, PLLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Protech Metal requires Dunham Hildebrand to:

   a. render legal advice with respect to the rights, powers and
      duties of the Debtor in the management of its property;

   b. investigate and, if necessary, institute legal action on
      behalf of the Debtor to collect and recover assets of the
      estates of the Debtor;

   c. prepare all necessary pleadings, orders and reports with
      respect to this proceeding and to render all other
      necessary or proper legal services;

   d. assist and counsel the Debtor in the preparation,
      presentation and confirmation of its disclosure statements
      and plans of reorganization;

   e. represent the Debtor as may be necessary to protect its
      interests; and

   f. perform all other legal services that may be necessary and
      appropriate in the general administration of the Debtor's
      estate.

Dunham Hildebrand will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                $300 to $350
     Paralegals                   $125

Dunham Hildebrand has received from the Debtor the amount of
$20,000 as a retainer.  Of this amount, $4,522.50 was earned and
paid prior to the Petition Date, $43.98 was used to reimburse the
Firm for expenses, $1,717 was used to pay the Chapter 11 filing
fee, and $13,716.52 is retained by the Firm and held in trust.

Dunham Hildebrand will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Griffin S. Dunham, a partner at Dunham Hildebrand, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Dunham Hildebrand can be reached at:

     Griffin S. Dunham, Esq.
     DUNHAM HILDEBRAND, PLLC
     2416 21st Avenue South, Suite 303
     Nashville, TN 37212
     Tel: (615) 933-5850
     E-mail: griffin@dhnashville.com

                About Protech Metal Finishing

Protech Metal Finishing, LLC -- https://protechfinishing.com/ -- is
a woman-owned full-service metal finishing company founded in 1980.
Protech is housed in a 32,000 square foot facility on 10 acres in
Vonore, Tennessee.  Protech services a large customer base in the
aerospace, defense, industrial, medical and automotive industries.

Protech Metal Finishing sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.
Tenn. Case No. 19-32732) on Aug. 26, 2019, Knoxville, Tennessee.
In the petition signed by CEO Phillip Michael Huddleston, the
Debtor wes estimated to have assets and liabilities at $1 million
to $10 million.  DUNHAM HILDEBRAND, PLLC, is counsel to the
Debtor.



R & S ST. ROSE: Confirmation of 3rd Amended Plan Upheld
-------------------------------------------------------
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Appellant, v. R & S ST. ROSE
LENDERS, LLC; R & S ST. ROSE, LLC; R & S INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC;
COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; THE CREDITOR GROUP; and
THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Appellees, Case No. 2:17-cv-01322-MMD (D. Nev.),
is an appeal from the Bankruptcy Court's order confirming R&S St.
Rose Lenders' Third Amended Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation in
Lenders' Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

BB&T asserts that Lenders' confirmed Plan does not meet the "good
faith" standard of the Bankruptcy Code because it rewards (or
constitutes) a "Ponzi scheme" and achieves a result that is
fundamentally unfair and inconsistent with the objectives and
purposes of the Bankruptcy Code.

BB&T contends that Lenders' confirmed Plan is lacking in good faith
under 11 U.S.C. section 1129(a)(3) because (1) it endorses a Ponzi
scheme and the Bankruptcy Court erred in finding otherwise and (2)
its distribution scheme is unfair to BB&T.

In response to BB&T's Ponzi scheme contention, Lenders raise a
threshold issue -- arguing that BB&T's allegation of a Ponzi scheme
is time-barred because such allegation should have been raised in
an avoidance action under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11
U.S.C. section 544, 546-48.

The District Court agrees with the Bankruptcy Court that BB&T fails
to produce sufficient evidence to support a finding that Lenders
engaged in a Ponzi scheme. Because the District Court has reached
this conclusion, the District  Court accordingly finds that BB&T
fails to establish fraudulent intent to support a conclusion that
Lenders' Plan did not meet the good faith standard under the
Bankruptcy Code.

The District Court also finds that the plan distribution scheme
which holds back a pro rata share for BB&T in the event its
misrepresentation and civil conspiracy claims are ultimately
successful is not unduly unfair to BB&T (or any other creditor who
may not be repaid as a result of Lenders filing bankruptcy).

BB&T contends that a finding of good faith is nonetheless
undermined by other testimony by Nourafchan that Lenders would not
pursue fraudulent transfer actions or other avoidance actions
against purported Ponzi scheme winners. Lenders submits that any
action for fraudulent transfer or avoidance would be transferred to
the liquidating trustee, Brian D. Shapiro.

The evidence does not support a conclusion that the Bankruptcy
Court clearly erred in finding the Plan consistent with the
objectives and purposes of the Bankruptcy Code--specifically to
distribute proceeds in a manner that is fundamentally fair.
Accordingly, the District Court affirms the Bankruptcy Court's
confirmation of Lenders' Plan.

A copy of the District Court's Order dated Sept. 30, 2019 is
available at https://bit.ly/2Jl0EFO from Leagle.com.

R & S St. Rose Lenders, LLC, In Re, represented by Nedda Ghandi ,
Ghandi Deeter Blackham & David J. Merrill , David J. Merrill, P.C.

Branch Banking & Trust Company, Appellant, represented by J.
Stephen Peek -- speek@hollandhart.com -- Holland & Hart, LLP,
Joseph S. Kistler , Hutchison & Steffen & Joseph G. Went --
jgwent@hollandhart.com -- Holland & Hart LLP.

The Creditor Group, Defendant, represented by Talitha Gray
Kozlowski , Garman Turner Gordon.

R & S St. Rose, LLC, Appellee, represented by Samuel A. Schwartz --
saschwartz@bhfs.com -- Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP & Bryan
A. Lindsey , The Schwartz Law Firm, Inc.

R & S St. Rose Lenders, LLC, Appellee, represented by David J.
Merrill , David J. Merrill, P.C. & Nedda Ghandi , Ghandi Deeter
Blackham.

                  About R & S St. Rose Lenders

Las Vegas, Nevada-based R & S St. Rose Lenders, LLC, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 11-14973)
on April 4, 2011. Rose Lenders disclosed $12,041,574 in assets and
$24,502,319 in liabilities in its schedules, as amended. Its
primary asset consists of its claim in the scheduled amount of $12
million against R&S St. Rose, LLC.

Affiliate R & S St. Rose, LLC, filed a separate Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 11-14974) on April 4, 2011. According to
its schedules, it disclosed $16,821,500 in total assets and
$48,293,866 in total debts. Its primary asset consists of a fee
simple interest in approximately 38 acres of raw land located in
Henderson, Nevada.

R & S ST Rose Lenders' bankruptcy case is assigned to Judge Mike K.
Nakagawa.

R&S St. Rose Lenders has tapped Nedda Ghandi, Esq., of Ghandi Law
Offices as bankruptcy counsel. The Debtor previously had Larson &
Larson as counsel but the application was opposed by the U.S.
Trustee, prompting the withdrawal.

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company is represented by Scott
E. Gizer, Esq., at Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae LLP, in Las
Vegas, Nevada, and Mary C.G. Kaufman, Esq., at Early Sullivan
Wright Gizer & McRae LLP, in Los Angeles, California.

Branch Banking and Trust Company is represented by J. Stephen Peek,
Esq., and Joseph G. Went, Esq., at Holland & Hart LLP, in Las
Vegas, Nevada.


RANCHER'S LEGACY: Hires Platinum Management as Financial Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------------
Rancher's Legacy Meat Co., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Minnesota to employ Platinum Management,
LLC, as financial consultant and advisor to the Debtor.

Rancher's Legacy requires Platinum Management to:

   a. assess the value of the Debtor's assets, including accounts
      receivable, inventory and fixed assets;

   b. prepare all financial information required in connection
      with the bankruptcy case;

   c. assess value of the Debtor's business as a going concern;

   d. prepare the liquidation analysis to accompany any Plan of
      Reorganization;

   e. assist in preparation of the Debtor's Plan of
      Reorganization and Disclosure Statement;

   f. prepare and valuate the Debtor's projections in any Plan of
      Reorganization and assess its feasibility; and

   g. determine adequacy of consideration for creditors.

Platinum Management will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Patrick Brennan        $350
         Rod Peterson           $350

The Debtor paid Platinum Management a retainer of $7,500 on
September 19, 2019.

Platinum Management will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Rod Peterson, a partner at Platinum Management, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Platinum Management can be reached at:

     Patrick Brennan
     PLATINUM MANAGEMENT, LLC
     12301 Whitewater Drive, Suite 10
     Minnetonka, MN 55343
     Tel: (952) 829-5700
     Fax: (952) 829-9103
     E-mail: Pat.Brennan@thePlatinumGrp.com

                About Rancher's Legacy Meat Co.

Rancher's Legacy Meat Co. -- https://rancherslegacy.com/ -- owns
and operates an animal slaughtering and processing facility in
Vadnais Heights, Minnesota. Rancher's Legacy Meat was built to
produce fresh and frozen ground meat in patty and bulk
configurations.

Rancher's Legacy sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Minn. Case
No. 19-32928) on Sept. 20, 2019. In the petition signed by Arlyn J.
Lomen, president, the Debtor listed total assets of $13,291,000 and
total liabilities of $26,897,956 as of the Petition Date.

Judge Michael E Ridgway is assigned the case.  FOLEY & MANSFIELD
P.L.L.P., represents the Debtor.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 12 on Sept. 27, 2019, appointed five
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Rancher's Legacy Meat Company.


RANCHER'S LEGACY: Seeks to Hire Foley & Mansfield as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Rancher's Legacy Meat Co., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Minnesota to employ Foley & Mansfield,
PLLP, as counsel to the Debtor.

Rancher's Legacy requires Foley & Mansfield to:

   a. prepare the petition, schedules and Statement of affairs
      for the Debtor;

   b. represent the Debtor at the First Meeting of Creditors;

   c. consult with the Debtor in Possession regarding the
      administration of the bankruptcy case;

   d. assist with the Debtor's investigation of the acts,
      conduct, assets, rights, liabilities, and financial
      condition of the Debtor and of the operation of the
      Debtor's business;

   e. prepare, file or respond to all motions, adversary
      proceedings and other pleadings necessary for the Debtor to
      administer the bankruptcy case;

   f. review all claims filed in the case to prepare and file
      appropriate pleadings in connection therewith;

   g. assist in the formulation of the Plan of Reorganization an
      Disclosure Statement, advise the Debtor as to any issues
      relating to Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement
      proposed and collect and file with the court acceptances
      and rejections of the Plan of Reorganization; and

   h. perform such other services as the Debtor believes are in
      the interest of the Debtor and creditors of the estate.

Foley & Mansfield will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                   $425
     Associates                 $300
     Paralegals                 $150

The Debtor paid Foley & Mansfield a retainer in the amount of
$100,000 on September 19, 2019. Of this amount $38,577.50 was
earned and paid prior to the Petition Date, leaving a balance of
61,422.50 held in the Firm's trust account.

Foley & Mansfield will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Cameron A. Lallier, partner of Foley & Mansfield, PLLP, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Foley & Mansfield can be reached at:

     Cameron A. Lallier, Esq.
     FOLEY & MANSFIELD, PLLP
     250 Marquette Avenue, Suite 1200
     Minneapolis, MN
     Tel: (612) 338-8788

                About Rancher's Legacy Meat Co.

Rancher's Legacy Meat Co. -- https://rancherslegacy.com/ -- owns
and operates an animal slaughtering and processing facility in
Vadnais Heights, Minnesota. Rancher's Legacy Meat was built to
produce fresh and frozen ground meat in patty and bulk
configurations.

Rancher's Legacy sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Minn. Case
No. 19-32928) on Sept. 20, 2019.  In the petition signed by Arlyn
J. Lomen, president, the Debtor listed total assets of $13,291,000
and total liabilities of $26,897,956 as of the Petition Date.  

Judge Michael E Ridgway is assigned the case.

FOLEY & MANSFIELD P.L.L.P., represents the Debtor.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 12 on Sept. 27, 2019, appointed five
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Rancher's Legacy Meat Company.



RELIABLE REPAIRS: Seeks to Hire WH Law as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Reliable Repairs and Remodels Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas to hire wh
Law as its legal counsel.
   
The firm will advise the Debtor of its powers and duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services in connection
with its Chapter 11 case.

Brandon Haubert, Esq., the firm's attorney who will be handling the
case, charges an hourly fee of $300.  Paraprofessionals charge $100
per hour.

The Debtor executed a check for the fee of $3,000 to be deposited
to the attorney's client trust account, and paid wh Law the sum of
$1,717 for the filing fee.

Wh Law and its attorneys are "disinterested" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Brandon M. Haubert, Esq.
     wh Law         
     1 Riverfront Place, Suite 745          
     N. Little Rock, AR 7214         
     Phone: 501-891-6000         
     Fax: 501-222-3027
     Email: bk@wh.Law
            brandon@wh.law

                About Reliable Repairs and Remodels

Reliable Repairs and Remodels Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Ark. Case No. 19-15207) on
Sept. 30, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of between
$50,001 and $100,000.  The case is assigned to Judge Phyllis M.
Jones.


RENNOVA HEALTH: Seamus Lagan Has 26.8% Stake as of Aug. 30
----------------------------------------------------------
Seamus Lagan disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Aug. 30, 2019, he may
be deemed to beneficially own 2,500,053,384 shares of common stock
of Rennova Health, Inc. (or approximately 26.86% of the total
number of Shares then currently deemed outstanding), which consists
of 53,360 Shares owned of record by Mr. Lagan and 16 stock options
owned of record by Mr. Lagan, and as to which Mr. Lagan may be
deemed to have sole dispositive and voting power; and eight Shares
owned of record by Alcimede and 2,500,000,000 Shares into which the
Series J Preferred Stock owned of record by Alcimede are
convertible as of Aug. 30, 2019.  Mr. Lagan may be deemed to have
shared dispositive and voting power with Alcimede over the eight
Shares owned of record by Alcimede and the 2,500,000,000 Shares
into which the Series J Preferred Stock owned of record by Alcimede
are convertible as of Aug. 30, 2019.

This Amendment No. 6 to Schedule 13D was filed to report the change
in the conversion price of the Issuer's Series J Convertible
Preferred Stock owned by Alcimede, and consequently the number of
shares into which they are convertible.  Alcimede owns all of the
outstanding Series J Preferred Stock.  Each share of Series J
Preferred Stock is convertible, at any time at the option of the
holder, into that number of Shares determined by dividing the
stated value (which is $1.00 per share) of such share of Series J
Preferred Stock, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon, by
the conversion price.  The conversion price is equal to the average
closing price of the Shares on the 10 trading days immediately
prior to the conversion date.  Since March 18, 2019, the shares of
Series J Preferred Stock owned by Alcimede are convertible into
2,500,000,000 Shares.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

                    https://is.gd/sZUOkm

                    About Rennova Health

Rennova Health, Inc. -- http://www.rennovahealth.com/-- operates
three rural hospitals in Tennessee and provides diagnostics and
supportive software solutions to healthcare providers.

Rennova Health reported a net loss to common shareholders of
$245.86 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net
loss to common shareholders of $108.53 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Rennova Health had $14.19
million in total assets, $44.44 million in total liabilities, $5.83
million in redeemable preferred stock - Series I-1, $3.08 million
in redeemable preferred stock - Series I-2, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $39.16 million.

Haynie & Company, in Salt Lake City, Utah, the Company's auditor
since 2018, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated Oct. 18, 2019, on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company has
significant net losses, cash flow deficiencies, negative working
capital and an accumulated deficit.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


RETRIEVAL-MASTERS: Hires Geist Schwarz as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc., seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
employ Geist Schwarz & Jellinek, PLLC, as special litigation
counsel to the Debtor.

The Debtor is a tenant at its current location in Elmsford, New
York (the "Premises"). In April, 2018, the Debtor was suddenly
ordered out of the Premises with no advance warning, and ultimately
had to relocate its business for four months. The forced relocation
was caused by a release of asbestos into the Premises by a
contractor hired by the landlord to replace the roof on the
building that houses the Premises. The Debtor, at great expense,
had to find suitable alternate space to operate its business and
relocate its employees, and lost substantial revenue while the
business was unable to operate. The landlord refused to own up to
its obligation to compensate the Debtor for its loss, claiming
instead that the Debtor had not met its obligation to first seek
recourse from its own insurance policies. The Debtor actually did
make an insurance claim, but was denied coverage.

Ultimately, the Debtor had no choice but to file a complaint
against the landlord. In connection therewith, it hired Geist
Schwarz, which, commenced a prepetition action on the Debtor's
behalf in New York State Supreme Court, Westchester County (the
"State Court"), Index No. 51518/2019 (the "Landlord Litigation").
The Debtor made a motion for summary judgment, and the
defendant-landlord submitted opposition predicated on the fact that
discovery had not yet been conducted and that the Debtor may not
have fulfilled its obligation to seek recourse from its own insurer
before proceeding. On September 3, 2019, the State Court denied
summary judgment and, on September 5, 2019, the defendant-landlord
filed third party complaints to include various contractors who
performed work in connection with the roof project. The third
parties have not yet answered and once they do discovery will
commence.

The Debtor hires Geist Schwarz to proceed with the Landlord
Litigation to secure compensation for the damages it sustained and
to achieve a recovery for its estate.

Geist Schwarz will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Partners               $450
         Associates             $375

Prior to the Petition Date, Geist Schwarz received an initial
retainer in the amount of $5,000 on around April 25, 2018.  The
retainer was fully exhausted well before the Petition Date and, as
of the Petition Date, the Geist Schwarz is owed $3,780 for services
performed prior to the Petition Date in connection with the
Landlord Litigation.

Geist Schwarz will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Matthew D. Schwarz, partner of Geist Schwarz & Jellinek, PLLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Geist Schwarz can be reached at:

     Matthew D. Schwarz, Esq.
     GEIST SCHWARZ & JELLINEK, PLLC
     One North Lexington Avenue, 11th Floor
     White Plains, NY 10601
     Tel: (914) 644-8300
     Fax: (914) 644-8393

               About Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau

Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau, Inc. (RMCB) provides financial
services.  The Company operates as a recovery agency for consumer
collections.

Based in Elmsford, New York, Retrieval-Masters Creditors Bureau,
Inc., filed a voluntary petition for relief under the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-23185) on June 17, 2019.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert D. Drain.

Steven Wilamowsky at Chapman and Cutler LLP is the Debtor's
counsel. Geist Schwarz & Jellinek, PLLC, as special litigation
counsel.

On July 2, 2019, the Office of the United States Trustee formed an
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11 case.


ROBERT SILLERMAN: Committee Bid to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee Okayed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil granted the Committee of
Unsecured Creditors' motion to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the
bankruptcy case of Robert Francis Xavier Sillerman.

The Committee of Unsecured Creditors has moved for an order
appointing a chapter 11 trustee in the case of Debtor Sillerman or,
alternatively, converting the chapter 11 case to a chapter 7 case.
In support of its Motion, the Committee submitted a declaration of
Jil Mazer-Marino and a declaration of Neil Bivona. Two groups
consisting of eight separate creditors joined the Committee's
Motion.

The Court finds that this case is replete with examples of the
Debtor's failure to comply with the Bankruptcy Code and his
obligations thereunder. For example, like the Debtor in In re A.G.
Service Centers, the Debtor here has ignored the governing
Bankruptcy Code provisions regarding the retention of
professionals. Pursuant to section 327(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a
debtor-in-possession with the Court's approval, may employ
professionals, such as accountants, attorneys, auctioneers, or
appraisers, to represent the debtor or assist in carrying out its
duties, provided they are disinterested and do not hold or
represent an interest adverse to the estate. There is no question
the debtor may retain professionals only with court approval. "No
service performed by professionals is compensable until the court
approves such retention." In the Second Circuit, there is a per se
prohibition against compensating professionals for services
rendered prior to a retention order.

The Committee asserts that the Debtor paid more than $86,000 to
lawyers and accountants without Court authorization. The Debtor
does not dispute that he paid professionals without Court
authorization, but claims that he thought retention applications
were not required because he was paying those professionals in the
ordinary course.

The Debtor is clearly aware of the Bankruptcy Code's retention
requirements, since he previously sought a Court order authorizing
him to retain his attorney and real estate brokers. The Debtor even
sought authorization to cause an affiliate to retain a lending
broker (Castle Placement, LLC), reflecting his sophistication and
understanding that assets of an affiliated entity in which the
Debtor owns an interest may constitute property of the estate and
cannot be expended to retain professionals without Court
authorization.

In its argument that the Debtor retained counsel without Court
authorization, the Committee relies on the Debtor's MORs which
disclose that post-petition payments were made by the Debtor to an
attorney who had not been retained pursuant to an order of the
Court. The Debtor claims he thought retention applications were not
required because "most of these professionals were an in-house
lawyer and a bookkeeping service that had replaced an employee." In
direct contradiction, in his 1007-2 Affidavit the Debtor did not
disclose compensation to any employees as required and stated,
"Local Rule 1007-2(b)(1) is not applicable to my chapter 11 case."
Similarly, at the Hearing on the Committee's Motion, Debtor's
counsel tried to justify these unauthorized payments, arguing: "the
Committee next mentions -- Mr. Sillerman paid certain -- a certain
lawyer . . . [t]his has been an in-house counsel to Mr. Sillerman
for many, many years. She is no longer employed by Mr. Sillerman,
but during the course of her employment by him as in-house counsel,
she was indeed paid."

This rationale is simply not credible given the Debtor's suggestion
in his 1007-2 Affidavit at the start of the case suggesting that he
has no employees, the Court says.  As a debtor-in-possession, the
Debtor is required by the Bankruptcy Code and the Internal Revenue
Code to file tax returns on behalf of the estate. Courts routinely
recognize that failure to file tax returns constitutes cause under
section 1104(a)(1).

The Debtor's failure to fulfill the most basic obligation to file
the tax returns is not disputed. The Debtor concedes that he failed
to file income tax returns for 2017 and 2018. Although the Debtor
may have received an extension until October 15, 2019 to file his
2018 tax return, his failure to seek to retain an accountant until
the 11th hour casts serious doubt on his ability to file timely and
accurate returns.

At the Hearing on the Motion, the Committee expressed a clear
preference for appointment of a chapter 11 trustee. The Court has
found that the record evidence, including the undisputed facts, the
case docket, and the admissions by the Debtor, provides clear and
convincing evidence to support a finding of "cause" both to appoint
a trustee or to convert. There is, therefore, no need for an
evidentiary hearing in connection with the Motion.

The language of 1104(a) compels the Court to appoint a trustee if
"cause" is found. Section 1112(b) mandates conversion if "cause" is
found under that provision, but authorizes the Court to exercise
its discretion to instead appoint a trustee if it concludes it is
in the best interest of creditors and the estate. 11 U.S.C. section
1112(b)(1) ("[T]he court shall convert a case . . . for cause
unless the court determines that the appointment of a trustee under
section 1104(a) is in the best interest of creditors and the
estate."). Thus, even if the Court first determines that "cause"
exists to convert under section 1112(b), the Court may still, in
its discretion, appoint a chapter 11 trustee if it determines that
it is in the best interest of the estate to do so.

Based on its analysis, the Court finds "cause" under 1104(a)(1) to
appoint a trustee and "cause" under 1112(b) to convert. In light of
its finding of cause under 1104(a)(1), the Court is compelled to
enter an Order appointing a chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor's
estate. The Court also concludes under section 1112(b)(1) that
given the totality of the circumstances of this case, appointment
of a trustee, rather than conversion, is in the best interest of
creditors and the estate.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated Oct. 8,
2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2NelZlv from Leagle.com.

Robert Francis Xavier Sillerman, Debtor, represented by Laurie
Binder , Rosen & Associates, P.C., Paris Gyparakis , Rosen &
Associates, P.C. & Sanford Philip Rosen , Rosen & Associates, P.C.

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Richard C.
Morrissey , Office of the U.S. Trustee.

Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors, Official Committee Of
Unsecured Creditors, Creditor Committee, represented by Michael
Kwiatkowski , Cullen and Dykman LLP, Jil Mazer-Marino --
jmazermarino@cullendykman.com -- Cullen and Dykman LLP & Thomas R.
Slome -- tslome@cullenanddykman.com -- Cullen and Dykman LLP.

             About Robert Francis Xavier Sillerman

Creditors React Presents Inc., Clubtix Inc., Lucas King and Jeffrey
Callahan filed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition against Robert
Francis Xavier Sillerman (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-13633) on
December 26, 2017.  The creditors are represented by Michael James
Edelman, Esq.  The case was converted to one under Chapter 11 on
March 1, 2018.  Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil presides over the case.

The Debtor is represented by Laurie Binder, Esq., and Sanford
Philip Rosen, Esq., at Rosen & Associates, P.C.


ROCKET SOFTWARE: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B' ICR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Rocket Software Inc. to
negative from stable and affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating on
the company.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating on the
company's first-lien senior secured debt and its 'B-' issue-level
rating on the company's second-lien senior secured debt.

The negative outlook reflects the company's revenue weakness, due
to a decline in licensing revenue, and limited free cash flow
generation in the first half of 2019 because of
higher-than-expected one-time costs tied to the Bain acquisition.
This caused its leverage to increase to the low-8x area, which
exceeds S&P's current downside leverage threshold of mid-7x. Rocket
Software also executed two acquisitions in the second quarter of
2019 and one acquisition in the third quarter. While S&P expects
these acquisitions to be leverage neutral, the company used a
combination of revolver debt, seller financing, and some
longer-term debt to fund them, which increases the risk that it
will face elevated leverage and constrained liquidity during fiscal
year 2020. If Rocket Software's organic revenue growth remains
negative, S&P may revise its assessment of the company's business
risk profile and lower the rating.

The negative outlook on Rocket Software reflects the weakness in
the company's licensing revenues and its limited free cash flow
generation in the first half of 2019, which caused its adjusted
leverage to rise to the low-8x area, above S&P's current downside
threshold.

"We would lower our rating on Rocket Software to 'B-' if it
continues to face revenue declines or executes additional
acquisitions such that we expect it to sustain adjusted leverage
above the mid-7x area during fiscal year 2020," S&P said.

"We would revise our outlook on Rocket Software to stable if it
stabilizes and expands its revenue, improves its free cash flow to
debt to about 4%, pays down its outstanding seller financing, and
improves its leverage to the mid-7x area," the rating agency said.


RUBY'S FRANCHISE: Unsec. Creditors Will be Paid in Full Over Time
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ruby's Franchise Systems, Inc., a California corporation, submitted
a Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

This Disclosure Statement summarizes what is in the RFS Standalone
Plan, and gives you certain information relating to the RFS
Standalone Plan and the process the Court follows in determining
whether or not to confirm the RFS Standalone Plan.

According to the Disclosure Statement, the Plan proposes to treat
claims and interests as follows:

   * Class 1 Secured Claim of Opus Bank. IMPAIRED. RFS shall pay to
Opus Bank the amount of $80,000. The first monthly payment on
account of the New Opus Bank RFS Note will be due on the first
(1st) day of the first calendar month following the Effective Date
and will be in an amount equal to (a) the interest accrued on
account of the New Opus Bank RFS Note from the Effective Date
through the end of the calendar month in which the Effective Date
occurs, plus (b) principal calculated on the basis of a 4-year
amortization schedule.

   * Class 3 Allowed Claim of Steven L. Craig. IMPAIRED. The
Allowed Claim of Craig against RFS, as of the Petition Date, is in
the principal amount of $1,000,000, plus accrued interest under the
RFS Note in the approximate amount of $120,000. The amounts owed by
Craig for Franchise Royalties and Ad Fees, in the amount of
$635,556, shall be paid by Craig on the Effective Date, as
reflected in the Cash Flow Projections.

   * Class 5 General Unsecured Claims. IMPAIRED. The Debtor's
Allowed General Unsecured Claims against RFS total approximately
$430,329. Allowed Claims in Class 5 shall be paid in full, over
time, with post-Effective Date interest, as follows: (i) a cash
payment on the Effective Date in the amount of $19,952 shared pro
—rata, and (ii) on the first (1St) anniversary of the Effective
Date.

The Debtor will have the Cash needed to make payments required on
the Effective Date from Cash on hand as of the Effective Date,
implementation of the Netdown Process as set forth in the Cash Flow
Projections in Exhibit B to the Disclosure Statement.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Oct. 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2vburzu from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                About Ruby's Franchise Systems

Ruby's Franchise Systems, Inc. -- https://www.rubys.com/franchising
-- is the creator of Ruby's Diner which serves burgers, hand-made
milkshakes, in addition to a wide selection of breakfast, lunch and
dinner entrees.  Ruby's Diner operates across California, Nevada
and Texas.

Ruby's Franchise Systems filed its voluntary petition for relief
under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-13324) on Sept. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by Doug
Cavanaugh, president, the Debtor was estimated to have up to
$50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
Theodora Oringher PC, led by Eric J. Fromme, serves as general
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


SARAR USA: Unsecured Creditors to Recover 6.69% in Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
Sarar USA, Inc., filed a Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure
Statement.

The Plan provides that each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured
Claim will receive its pro rata percentage of $266,000.  The total
of Class 3 claims filed and scheduled equals $19,527,033.70, of
which $15,549,563.33 is the claim of Sarar Turkey.  The remaining
Class 3 Claims equal approximately $3,977,470.37.  Based on the
Claims filed to date, and the waiver of distribution by Sarar
Turkey, the Debtor estimates that holders of  Allowed Class 3
Claims will receive a distribution of at least 6.6877%.

The Debtor is the proponent of the Plan within the meaning of
Bankruptcy Code § 1129. The Plan contains separate Classes and
proposes recoveries for holders of Claims against and Equity
Interests in the Debtor. After careful review of the Debtor’s
current financial condition and the needs associated with
administering the Debtor’s assets, the Debtor has concluded that
the recovery to Creditors will be maximized through implementation
of the Plan.

Upon the Effective Date, the Sarar Turkey Claim shall be expunged
and no Distributions shall be made on account of the Sarar Turkey
Claim.

Cash payments on and after the Effective Date on account of Allowed
Administrative Claims, Allowed Priority Tax Claims, Allowed
Priority Claims, Allowed General Unsecured Claims under the Plan,
and any Cure required under Section 5.03 of the Plan, will be made
from the Debtor's Cash, which will be supplemented by the
Shareholders.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated October 21,
2019, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y2b4gsrt from
PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About Sarar USA Inc.

Sarar USA, Inc. -- https://www.sararonline.com/ -- is a retailer of
high-end men's apparel selling suits, tuxedos, shirts, jackets,
trousers, shoes, polo shirts, outerwear, knitwear and accessories.
The company is an affiliate of a company based in EskiSehir,
Turkey.  Sarar USA was founded in 2001 and is headquartered in
Little Falls, New Jersey.

Sarar USA, Inc., d/b/a Sarar USA, sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No. 18-24538) on July 20, 2018.  In the
petition signed by CEO Emre Duru, Sarar USA estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.  

The Hon. John K. Sherwood is the case judge.  

The Debtor tapped Schuyler G. Carroll, Esq., and Jeffrey Vanacore,
Esq., of Perkins Coie LLP as counsel.  Prime Clerk LLC acts is the
Debtor's claims agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.  The Committee
selected Kelley Drye & Warren LLP as its legal counsel.


SAVE MONEY: Proposes Full-Payment Reorganization Plan
-----------------------------------------------------
Save Money and Retain Temperature, LLC, filed a Plan of
Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

The Debtor has undergone some dramatic changes in its processes and
procedures since filing its Petition and has completely revitalized
its business mode.  The newfound stability will allow it to
effectively execute this Plan that provides 100% recovery for not
only the secured creditors, but the unsecured creditors as well.

The Debtor filed its voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code due to a shortage of funds necessary
to meet payments to creditors; as well as the need to deal with a
major creditor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated Oct. 21, 2019,
is available at https://tinyurl.com/y5wtsrp3 from PacerMonitor.com
at no charge.

                        About Save Money

Save Money and Retain Temperature, LLC, is an insulation contractor
in Tampa, Fla., which specializes in roofing, siding and sheet
metal work.

Save Money and Retain Temperature sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-04090) on
April 30, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was
estimated to have assets of between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities of the same range.  Santana, Byrd & Jaap, P.A., is the
Debtor's counsel.


SEARS HOLDINGS: Dist. Court Stays Cenobia Perez Suit vs Kmart
-------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Curtis V. Gomez designates the case captioned
CENOBIA PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. KMART CORPORATION D/B/A KMART,
Defendant, Civil. No. 2017-59 (D.V.I.) as a suspense matter.

The Court has been informed that Sears Holdings Corporation has
filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Sears's bankruptcy petition automatically stays all judicial
proceedings against Sears and its debtor-affiliates. Kmart
Corporation is listed as a debtor affiliate in Sears's Chapter 11
petition.

On Nov. 1, 2019, and on the first day of every month thereafter,
the parties must apprise the Court of the status of the bankruptcy
proceedings.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Sept. 30, 2019 is available at
https://bit.ly/2Whbxhc from Leagle.com.

Cenobia Perez, Plaintiff, represented by Ryan W. Greene.

Kmart Corporation, Defendant, represented by Richard F. Farrelly ,
Law Offices of Birch DeJongh & Hindels PLLC.

                      About Sears Holdings

Sears Holdings Corporation (OTCMKTS: SHLDQ) --
http://www.searsholdings.com/-- began as a mail ordering catalog
company in 1887 and became the world's largest retailer in the
1960s.  At its peak, Sears was present in almost every big mall
across the U.S., and sold everything from toys and auto parts to
mail-order homes.  Sears claims to be is a market leader in the
appliance, tool, lawn and garden, fitness equipment, and automotive
repair and maintenance retail sectors.

Sears and Kmart merged to form Sears Holdings in 2005 when they had
3,500 US stores between them. Kmart emerged in 2005 from its own
bankruptcy.

Unable to keep up with online stores and other brick-and-mortar
retailers, a long series of store closings has left it with 687
retail stores in 49 states, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin
Islands as of mid-October 2018.  The Company employs 68,000
individuals, of whom 32,000 are full-time employees.

As of Aug. 4, 2018, Sears Holdings had $6.93 billion in total
assets, $11.33 billion in total liabilities and a total deficit of
$4.40 billion.

Unable to cover a $134 million debt payment due Oct. 15, 2018,
Sears Holdings Corporation and 49 subsidiaries sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-23538) on Oct. 15,
2018.

The Hon. Robert D. Drain is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as legal counsel;
M-III Partners as restructuring advisor; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as
investment banker; DLA Piper LLP as real estate advisor; and Prime
Clerk as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed nine creditors, including
the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., and landlord Simon Property
Group, L.P., to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The committee tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
as legal counsel; FTI Consulting as financial advisor; and Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc. as investment banker.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 on July 9, 2019, appointed five
retirees to serve on the committee representing retirees with life
insurance benefits in the Chapter 11 cases.

                         *     *     *

In February 2019, Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain granted Sears
Holdings approval to sell the business to majority shareholder and
CEO Eddie Lampert for approximately $5.2 billion.  Lampert's ESL
Investments, Inc., has won an auction to acquire substantially all
of Sears' assets, including the "Go Forward Stores" on a
going-concern basis.  The proposal will allow 425 stores to remain
open and provide ongoing employment to 45,000 employees.


SENECA APARTMENTS: Seeks Approval to Hire Bankruptcy Attorney
-------------------------------------------------------------
Seneca Apartments, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of New York to hire James Joyce,
Esq., as its legal counsel.
   
The attorney will provide services in connection with the Debtor's
Chapter 11 case, which include legal advice regarding its powers
and duties under the Bankruptcy Code and the preparation of a
bankruptcy plan.

The Debtor will pay the attorney an hourly fee of $250.  

Mr. Joyce neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

Mr. Joyce maintains an office at:

     James M. Joyce, Esq.
     4733 Transit Road
     Lancaster, NY 14043
     Phone: 716-656-0600
     E-mail: jmjoyce@lawyer.com

                      About Seneca Apartments

Seneca Apartments, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-11895) on Sept. 23,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor was estimated to have
assets of between $100,001 and $500,000 and liabilities of the same
range.  The case is assigned to Judge Carl L. Bucki.


SENIOR CARE: CHI Javelin Landlords File Disclosure Objections
-------------------------------------------------------------
CHI Javelin LLC, CHI Javelin Winters Park LLC, CHI Javelin Denison
LLC, CHI Javelin Frisco LLC, CHI Javelin Allen LLC, and CHI Javelin
Vista Ridge LLC (collectively "CHI Javelin Landlords"), creditors,
filed an objection to the Disclosure Statement for Senior Care
Centers, LLC's Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.

CHI Javelin Landlords point out that the Disclosure Statement
should not be approved because it fails to provide adequate
information, pursuant to Section 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

CHI Javelin Landlords assert that the Debtors have failed to
disclose: (i) that certain Insurance Defaults remain uncured and
constitute Events of Default under the Master Lease; (ii) the
Debtors' intent with respect to such uncured Insurance Defaults;
and (iii) the consequences under the Master Lease, and impact to
the Plan, for failing to cure such Insurance Defaults.

According to CHI Javelin Landlords, the omissions related to the
Insurance Defaults constitute a failure of the Debtors to disclose,
at the minimum, "information relevant to the risks posed to
creditors under the plan and such information is necessary for
creditors to make an informed judgment about the Plan.

Attorneys for CHI Javelin Landlords:

     Joseph J. Wielebinski
     Jason A. Enright
     WINSTEAD PC
     500 Winstead Building
     2728 N. Harwood Street
     Dallas, Texas 75201
     Phone: (214) 745-5400
     Fax: (214) 745-5390

                    About Senior Care Centers

Senior Care Centers, LLC -- https://senior-care-centers.com/ -- is
a Dallas-based, skilled nursing and long-term care industry leader
in Texas and Louisiana. Senior Care Centers operates and manages
more than 100 skilled nursing and assisted/independent living
communities in the states of Texas and Louisiana.

On Dec. 4, 2018, Senior Care Centers and 120 of its subsidiaries
filed voluntary Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case
No. 18-33967).

The Debtors are represented by lawyers at Polsinelli PC as
bankruptcy counsel and Rochelle McCullough, LLP as conflicts
counsel.  Sitrik and Company serves as communications consultant;
and Omni Management Group, Inc. as claims, noticing, and
administrative agent of the Debtors.

On Dec. 14, 2018, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed
an official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11
cases.  The Committee retained Greenberg Traurig, LLP as counsel,
and FTI Consulting, Inc. as its financial advisor.


SHERIDAN HOLDING: Hires Jackson Walker as Co-Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Sheridan Holding Comopany II, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Texas to employ Jackson Walker LLP, as co-counsel to the
Debtors.

Sheridan Holding requires Jackson Walker to:

   a. provide legal advice and services regarding local rules,
      practices, and procedures, including Fifth Circuit law;

   b. provide certain services in connection with administration
      of the chapter 11 cases, including, without limitation,
      preparing agendas, hearing notices, witness and exhibit
      lists, and hearing binders of documents and pleadings;

   d. review and comment on proposed drafts of pleadings to be
      filed with the Court;

   e. at the request of the Debtors, appear in Court and at any
      meeting with the U.S. Trustee, and any meeting of creditors
      at any given time on behalf of the Debtors as their local
      and conflicts bankruptcy co-counsel;

   f. perform all other services assigned by the Debtors to the
      Firm as local and conflicts bankruptcy co-counsel;

   g. provide independent counsel to the Debtors and its debtor
      affiliates; and

   h. provide legal advice and services on any matter on which
      Akin Gump may have a conflict or as needed based on
      specialization.

Jackson Walker will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                     $565 to $715
     Legal Assistants                  $185

On August 1, 2019, the Debtors provided a retainer to the Jackson
Walker in the amount of $75,000. On September 12, 2019, Jackson
Walker received an additional payment of $45,922.00 for prepetition
services. On the day of the filing, Jackson Walker incurred
expenses, and continues to hold a retainer in the amount of
$75,000.

Jackson Walker will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, the
following is provided in response to the request for additional
information:

   Question:  Did you agree to any variations from, or
              alternatives to, your standard or customary billing
              arrangements for this engagement?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  Do any of the professionals included in this
              engagement vary their rate based on the geographic
              location of the bankruptcy case?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  If you represented the client in the 12 months
              prepetition, disclose your billing rates and
              material financial terms for the prepetition
              engagement, including any adjustments during the 12
              months prepetition. If your billing rates and
              material financial terms have changed postpetition,
              explain the difference and the reasons for the
              difference.

   Response:  The Firm represented the Debtors during the weeks
              immediately before the Petition Date, using the
              foregoing hourly rates.

   Question:  Has your client approved your prospective budget
              and staffing plan, and, if so for what budget
              period?

   Response:  The Firm has not prepared a budget.

Matthew D. Cavenaugh, partner of Jackson Walker LLP, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Jackson Walker can be reached at:

     Matthew D. Cavenaugh, Esq.
     JACKSON WALKER LLP
     1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900
     Houston, TX 77010
     Tel: (713) 752-4200
     Fax: (713) 752-4221

              About Sheridan Holding Comopany II, LLC

Sheridan Holding Company II LLC --
http://www.sheridanproduction.com/-- is an independent oil and
natural gas company with production and development activities in
the Rocky Mountains, West Texas, and New Mexico.

Sheridan and its debtor-affiliates comprise one of three private
placement oil and gas investment funds in the Sheridan group, all
under the common management of non-debtor Sheridan Production
Partners Manager, LLC.

The Debtors' assets are primarily mature producing properties with
long-lived production, relatively shallow decline curves, and
lower-risk development opportunities.

Sheridan Holding Company II, LLC, and certain affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 19-35198) on Sept.
15, 2019, to seek confirmation of a prepackaged plan of
reorganization that would reduce debt by $900 million.

The Debtors are estimated to have $100 million to $500 million in
assets and at least $1 billion in liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.

The Hon. Marvin Isgur is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Jackson Walker L.L.P. as local bankruptcy counsel;
Evercore Group L.L.C. as investment banker; and AlixPartners, LLP
as restructuring advisor. Prime Clerk LLC is the claims agent.



SKYTEC INC: Unsecureds to be Paid At Least 20% in 3 Years
---------------------------------------------------------
Skytec, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Puerto Rico a Second Amended Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement.

The holders of allowed general unsecured claims will be paid, in
full satisfaction of their claims, a pro rata dividend in the total
amount of $870,966.42 to be paid as follows:
(i) $200,000 on the Effective Date to be paid from the capital
contribution of the shareholders and; (ii) $670,966.42 in 36
monthly payments commencing on the Effective Date.

The $870,966.42 constitutes a 20% dividend of the claims expected
to be allowed.  Said dividend could be increased by the Plan
Administrator depending on the avoidance actions that could be
filed and Debtor's actual cash receipts during the subject period
of time.

The Equity Holders will not receive any distribution under the
Plan, but will retain his shares in Debtor, unaltered.

Debtor's proposed dividend to the general unsecured claims will be
funded from Debtor's normal operations, cash available in Debtor's
DIP accounts, and the capital contributions. Payments to the
holders of allowed administrative expense claims and Priority Tax
Claims, if any, will be paid from the cash accumulated in Debtor's
DIP Accounts.

A full-text copy of the second amended plan dated Oct. 17, 2019, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y3vbt2zn from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

                       About Skytec Inc.

Skytec, Inc., is a privately-held company based in Puerto Rico that
provides wireless telecommunication solutions.  Skytec sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R.
Case No. 18-05288) on Sept. 12, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Henry L. Barreda, president, the Debtor disclosed $2,119,734 in
assets and $5,848,090 in liabilities. Judge Enrique S. Lamoutte
Inclan oversees the case.  The Debtor tapped Fuentes Law Offices,
LLC as its legal counsel.


SPANISH BROADCASTING: Bardin Hill Owns 7% CL-A Shares as of Oct. 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, these entities and individual reported beneficial
ownership of Class A common stock, $0.0001 par value, of Spanish
Broadcasting System, Inc. as of Oct. 31, 2019:

                                              Shares      Percent
                                           Beneficially     of
   Reporting Person                           Owned       Class
   ----------------                        ------------  --------
   Bardin Hill Investment Partners LP        295,074         7%
   Bardin Hill Investment Partners GP LLC    295,074         7%
   HCN LP                                    207,503       4.9%
   HCN GP LLC                                207,503       4.9%
   Bardin Hill Event-Driven Master Fund LP    87,571       2.1%
   Bardin Hill Fund GP LLC                    87,571       2.1%
   Jason Dillow                              295,074         7%

The percentages are calculated based upon an aggregate of 4,241,991
Shares outstanding as of Aug. 7, 2019 as reported in the Issuer's
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019 filed with
the SEC on Aug. 9, 2019.

The securities reported are directly held by HCN LP and Bardin Hill
Master Fund.  Bardin Hill Partners is the investment manager of
each of the Funds, and pursuant to Investment Management
Agreements, Bardin Hill Partners exercises voting and investment
power over securities directly held by the Funds.  Bardin Hill
Partners GP is the general partner of Bardin Hill Partners.  HCN GP
is the general partner of HCN.  Bardin Hill GP is the general
partner of Bardin Hill Master Fund.  Jason Dillow is the chief
executive officer and chief investment officer of Bardin Hill
Partners.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

                      https://is.gd/pm7PQ2

                   About Spanish Broadcasting

Based in Miami, Florida, Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.
(OTCMKTS:SBSAA) -- http://www.spanishbroadcasting.com/-- owns and
operates radio stations located in the top U.S. Hispanic markets of
New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago, San Francisco and Puerto
Rico, airing the Tropical, Regional Mexican, Spanish Adult
Contemporary, Top 40 and Urbano format genres SBS also operates
AIRE Radio Networks, a national radio platform of over 250
affiliated stations reaching 94% of the U.S. Hispanic audience.  
SBS also owns MegaTV, a network television operation with
over-the-air, cable and satellite distribution and affiliates
throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico, produces a nationwide roster
of live concerts and events, and owns a stable of digital
properties, including La Musica, a mobile app providing
Latino-focused audio and video streaming content and HitzMaker, a
new-talent destination for aspiring artists.

Spanish Broadcasting reported net income of $16.49 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to net income of $19.62 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company
had $454.09 million in total assets, $539.17 million in total
liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $85.07 million.

Crowe LLP, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the Company's auditor since
2013, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report dated April 1,
2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the 12.5% Senior Secured
Notes had a maturity date of April 15, 2017.  Cash from operations
or the sale of assets was not sufficient to repay the notes when
they became due.  In addition, at Dec. 31, 2018 the Company had a
working capital deficiency.  These factors raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


SPORTCO HOLDINGS: Seeks Confirmation of Liquidating Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
SportCo Holdings, Inc. and certain of its wholly-owned direct and
indirect subsidiaries submitted a memorandum of law in support of
confirmation of the Third Amended Combined Disclosure Statement and
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation, which is supported by the
vast majority of creditors entitled to vote.

The Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement was developed following
a marketing and sale process, the liquidation of inventory, a sale
of real estate, a sale of one brand, and lengthy arm's-length
negotiations between the Debtors, the Official Committee of
Unsecured  Creditors, and the Prepetition Term Loan Lenders.  

The Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement provides that the
Prepetition Term Loan Lenders will fund certain Causes of Action
which are the only potential recovery source for general unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 cases.  The only party attempting to
stand in the way  of this progress is a litigation counter party
that has contractually subordinated its rights to the Prepetition
Term Loan Lenders.  The Court should see through this litigation
tactic and confirm the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement.

The Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement is a liquidating plan
and provides for the creation of a Liquidation Trust to which
certain assets will be transferred, the selection of a Liquidation
Trustee,  and appointment of an Oversight Board for the benefit of
the Debtors' creditors.  Following  the Effective Date, the assets
transferred to the Liquidation Trust will include (i) $500,000 (the
"Liquidation Trust Funding Amount"); (ii) recoveries from claims
and causes of action belonging to the Prepetition Term Loan Lenders
(the "Type A Causes of Action"); and (iii) various claims and
causes of action belonging to the Debtors and/or their estates as
defined in the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement (the "Type B
Causes of Action" and together with the Liquidation Trust Funding
Amount, and Type A Causes of Action, the "Liquidation Trust
Assets").  In addition to providing the Liquidation Trust Assets,
the Prepetition Term Loan Lenders have permitted the on-going use
of their cash collateral, have agreed to release and forego any
liens they may have with regard to the Liquidation Trust Assets,and
have agreed to share the recoveries generated from the Liquidation
Trust Assets with general unsecured  creditors.  The general
unsecured creditors will receive a larger recovery under this
mechanism  than they would receive without the concessions from the
Prepetition Term Loan Lenders.  Similarly, the Prepetition Term
Loan Lenders have agreed to forego their significant diminution
claim.  These concessions will allow for a greater potential
recovery for holders of general unsecured claims, which general
unsecured creditors would not otherwise be entitled to receive.

The Plan provides that:

   * Holders of Claims in Class (Other Priority Claims) and Class 3
(Other Secured Claims) are unimpaired, and thus, deemed to accept
the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement.

   * Holders of Claims in Class 2 (Prepetition Term  Loan  Claims)
and Class 4 (General  Unsecured Claims and Prepetition Term Loan
Deficiency Claims) are impaired.  Holders of Claims in Class 2 and
Class 4 are sharing in the distributions from the Liquidation
Trust. For Type A Causes of Action recoveries, Holders of Claims in
Class 2 will receive 38% of the proceeds, which accounts for the
cost of pursuing such claims, and of the remaining 62% of such
proceeds, 15% will be distributed to the Holders of Claims in Class
4 and 85% will be distributed to the Holders of Claims in Class 2.
For Type B Causes of Action recoveries, after the repayment of the
Liquidation Trust Funding Amount B to Holders of Class 2 Claims and
other potential costs or expenses, Holders of Class 4 Claims will
receive 30% of such proceeds and Holders of Class 2 Claims will
receive 70% of proceeds from the Type B Causes of Action.

   * Holders of Interests in Class 6 (Equity Interests) are not
receiving any distribution.   Holders of Claims in Class 5
(Wellspring Subordinated Claims) are being subordinated to the
Claims of the Prepetition Term Loan Lenders and are not entitled to
a distribution until the Prepetition Term Loan Lenders are paid in
full under the Combined Plan and Disclosure  Statement.  Both
Classes 5 and 6 are deemed to reject the Combined Plan and
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Section 1126(g) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum of Law in Support of
Confirmation dated Oct. 17, 2019, is available at
https://tinyurl.com/y6qtmfro from PacerMonitor.com at no charge.

                     About SportCo Holdings

United Sporting Companies, Inc., was founded in 1933 under the name
Ellett Brothers, Inc. before merging with Jerry's Sports, Inc., in
2009 and formally changing its name to United Sporting Companies,
Inc. on July 16, 2010. Headquartered in Chapin, S.C., the companies
are marketers and distributors of a broad line of products and
accessories for hunting and shooting sports, marine, camping,
archery, and other outdoor activities.

The companies' product line of over 55,000 SKUs includes firearms,
reloading, marine electronics, trolling motors, optics, cutlery,
archery equipment, ammunition, leather goods, camping equipment,
sportsman gifts, and a variety of other outdoor sporting goods
products. The companies carry the major brands in the outdoor
sports industry, including Remington, Ruger, Browning, Winchester,
Smith & Wesson, Glock, Bushnell, Sig Sauer, Springfield Armory,
Hornaday, Henry, Magpul, Armscor, MotorGuide, Minn Kota, Lowrance,
Federal, CCI, Taurus, and Leupold.  The companies employ 321
people. SportCo, a Delaware corporation, is a holding company with
no business operations.

SportCo Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates, including United
Sporting Companies, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11299) on June 10,
2019. At the time of the filing, SportCo listed less than $50,000
and liabilities between $100 million and $500 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein.

The Debtors tapped McDermott Will & Emery LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel; Polsinelli PC as local Delaware counsel; Winter Harbor LLC
as restructuring advisor; BMC Group, Inc. as notice and claims
agent; and Wilson Kibler, Inc., as real estate broker.

Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on June 17, 2019,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained
Lowenstein Sandler LLP, as counsel, and Morris James LLP, as
co-counsel.


STEINER BROTHER: Seeks to Hire SVN Corporate as Real Estate Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Steiner Brother Properties, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to hire a
real estate agent.
   
In an application filed in court, the Debtor proposes to employ SVN
Corporate Real Estate Services and the firm's real estate agent,
Jeff Hammond, to market its real property.  

SVN will receive a percentage of the purchase price at the closing
of the sale.

Mr. Hammond disclosed in court filings that the firm neither holds
nor represents any interest materially adverse to the Debtor.

SVN can be reached through:

     Jeff Hammond
     SVN Corporate Real Estate Services
     Phone: 210-889-6819
     Email: jhammond@svn.com

                 About Steiner Brother Properties

Steiner Brother Properties LLC classifies its business as single
asset real estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).
  
Steiner Brother Properties LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 19-62232) on Aug.
5, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $447,243
in assets and $3,449,075 in liabilities.  The case has been
assigned to Judge Paul Baisier.  The Debtor is represented by Robl
Law Group LLC.


STONEMOR PARTNERS: Axar Entities Own 61.5% of Common Units
----------------------------------------------------------
Axar Capital Management, LP, Axar GP, LLC, and Andrew Axelrod
disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission that as of Oct. 30, 2019, they beneficially own
49,517,272 Common Units Representing Limited Partnership Interests
(including 37,843,177 Common Units issuable upon conversion of
Preferred Units) of StoneMor Partners L.P., representing 61.5
percent of the Common Units outstanding.  The percentage was
calculated based upon 42,636,311 Common Units outstanding
immediately following the Rights Offering, as reported in the
Issuer's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on Oct. 29,
2019, and assumes the conversion of the reported Preferred Units by
the Reporting Persons.

On Oct. 30, 2019, the Reporting Persons purchased 3,925,660 Common
Units in a privately negotiated transaction at a purchase price of
$1.00 per Common Unit (excluding commissions and fees).

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

                        https://is.gd/cdW7yT

                       About StoneMor Partners

StoneMor Partners L.P., headquartered in Trevose, Pennsylvania --
http://www.stonemor.com/-- is an owner and operator of cemeteries
and funeral homes in the United States, with 321 cemeteries and 90
funeral homes in 27 states and Puerto Rico.  StoneMor's cemetery
products and services, which are sold on both a pre-need (before
death) and at-need (at death) basis, include: burial lots, lawn and
mausoleum crypts, burial vaults, caskets, memorials, and all
services which provide for the installation of this merchandise.

StoneMor reported a net loss of $72.69 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $75.15 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company had
$1.76 billion in total assets, $1.76 billion in total liabilities,
$57.50 million in total redeemable convertible preferred units, and
a total partners' deficit of $60.94 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Feb. 13, 2019, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded StoneMor Partners L.P.'s Corporate Family rating to Caa2
from Caa1 and Probability of Default rating to Caa3-PD from
Caa1-PD.  The Caa2 CFR reflects Moody's concern that if pre-need
cemetery selling and liquidity pressures do not abate while the
senior secured credit facility is being refinanced, a distressed
exchange or other default event could become more likely.

As reported by the TCR on July 3, 2019, S&P Global Ratings affirmed
its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on StoneMor Partners L.P.  The
outlook remains negative.  S&P said, "The rating affirmation
reflects our view that despite the removal of near term maturities
and sufficient liquidity over the next twelve months, we continue
to view StoneMor's capital structure as unsustainable in the long
term given our projection for persistent free cash flow deficits.


STONEMOR PARTNERS: Oaktree Entities No Longer Own Common Units
--------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, these entities reported that they have ceased to
beneficially own common units representing limited partnership
interests of StoneMor Partners L.P. as of Oct. 30, 2019:

   * Oaktree Value Equity Holdings, L.P.
   * Oaktree Value Equity Fund GP, L.P.
   * Oaktree Value Equity Fund GP Ltd.
   * Oaktree Capital Management, L.P.
   * Oaktree Holdings, Inc.
   * Oaktree Fund GP I, L.P.
   * Oaktree Capital I, L.P.   
   * OCM Holdings I, LLC   
   * Oaktree Holdings, LLC
   * Oaktree Capital Group, LLC

Oaktree Value Equity Fund GP, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted
limited partnership, is the general partner of VE Holdings.

As of Oct. 29, 2019, VE Holdings directly held 3,950,660 common
units representing limited partnership interests of the Issuer. VE
Holdings disposed of its remaining Units in a series of
transactions on Oct. 31, 2019, and the Reporting Persons ceased to
beneficially own any Units.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free
at:

                       https://is.gd/l50UQL

                     About StoneMor Partners

StoneMor Partners L.P., headquartered in Trevose, Pennsylvania --
http://www.stonemor.com/-- is an owner and operator of cemeteries
and funeral homes in the United States, with 321 cemeteries and 90
funeral homes in 27 states and Puerto Rico.  StoneMor's cemetery
products and services, which are sold on both a pre-need (before
death) and at-need (at death) basis, include: burial lots, lawn and
mausoleum crypts, burial vaults, caskets, memorials, and all
services which provide for the installation of this merchandise.

StoneMor reported a net loss of $72.69 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $75.15 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2019, the Company had
$1.76 billion in total assets, $1.76 billion in total liabilities,
$57.50 million in total redeemable convertible preferred units, and
a total partners' deficit of $60.94 million.

                            *   *   *

As reported by the TCR on Feb. 13, 2019, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded StoneMor Partners L.P.'s Corporate Family rating to Caa2
from Caa1 and Probability of Default rating to Caa3-PD from
Caa1-PD.  The Caa2 CFR reflects Moody's concern that if pre-need
cemetery selling and liquidity pressures do not abate while the
senior secured credit facility is being refinanced, a distressed
exchange or other default event could become more likely.

As reported by the TCR on July 3, 2019, S&P Global Ratings affirmed
its 'CCC+' issuer credit rating on StoneMor Partners L.P.  The
outlook remains negative.  S&P said, "The rating affirmation
reflects our view that despite the removal of near term maturities
and sufficient liquidity over the next twelve months, we continue
to view StoneMor's capital structure as unsustainable in the long
term given our projection for persistent free cash flow deficits.


TACALA INVESTMENT: Moody's Affirms 'B3' CFR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Tacala Investment Corp.'s B3
Corporate Family Rating and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating.
The company's B2 rated revolving credit facility and upsized first
lien term loan, as well as the company's Caa2 rated upsized second
lien term loan were also affirmed. The outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the proposed $75 million incremental 1st lien term
loan, $20 million incremental 2nd lien term loan, along with $21
million of cash from the balance sheet, will be used to fund a $110
million cash dividend to shareholders and pay approximately $6
million in related fees and expenses. Ratings are subject to the
execution of the proposed transaction and Moody's receipt and
review of final documentation.

The affirmation of the B3 CFR, despite the proposed largely debt
funded credit negative dividend that will increase leverage to the
high 6 times range, reflects the strength of the Taco Bell brand
and expectation for continued same store sales and EBITDA growth
that will bring leverage down, aided by new store development and
remodeling, as well as acquired restaurants. The affirmation also
reflects Tacala's continued good liquidity, with balance sheet cash
of $15 million at the close of the transaction, an undrawn $30
million revolver, and the expectation for capital expenditures to
be funded from cash flow going forward.

Affirmations:

Issuer: Tacala Investment Corp.

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B3-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B3

  Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

  Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Credit Facility, Affirmed B2
(LGD3)

  Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term Loan, Affirmed Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Tacala Investment Corp.

  Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Tacala's B3 rating is constrained by its high leverage,
particularly given its modest scale with regards to revenue and
number of restaurants. The rating also considers the company's
geographic concentration in Texas and the Southeast US, material
capex requirements and aggressive financial policy as evidenced by
its planned $110 million largely debt financed dividend. Tacala
benefits from the strength and brand awareness of the Taco Bell
brand, positive same store comparable sales, with growth in revenue
and EBITDA. The company's good liquidity, including undrawn
revolver and expectation for capital expenditures to be funded from
cash flow further support the rating.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that debt protection
metrics will gradually improve as restaurants are re-imaged and new
locations are added organically and through acquired units. The
outlook also anticipates that Tacala will maintain good liquidity.

Factors that could result in an upgrade include stronger credit
metrics, the evidence of measured progress towards an increase in
scale and geographic diversity and a balanced financial policy.
Specifically, a higher rating would require debt to EBITDA
migrating to under 5.5 times and EBIT coverage of gross interest of
around 1.75 times on a sustained basis. An upgrade would also
require good liquidity.

A downgrade could occur if debt protection metrics don't improve
from current levels over the next twelve to eighteen months.
Specifically, a downgrade could occur if debt to EBITDA failed to
migrate towards 6.5 times. A deterioration in liquidity, additional
debt financed dividends, and aggressive financial policy could also
result in a downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Restaurant
Industry published in January 2018.

Tacala, with headquarters in Vestavia Hills, Alabama, owns and
operates 313 Taco Bell franchised restaurants in Texas and the
Southeastern US. Revenue for the last twelve-month period ended
9/3/2019 was approximately $480 million. Tacala is majority owned
by Altamont Capital Partners.


TRANSUNION LLC: S&P Rates New $1.75BB Term Loan B-5 'BB+'
---------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'BB+' issue-level rating to
TransUnion LLC's proposed $1.75 billion term loan B-5 due in
November 2026 with a '3' recovery rating, reflecting its
expectation of meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%)
in the event of a payment default.

The company will use the net proceeds and about $80 million of
balance sheet cash to repay $1.821 billion of outstanding term loan
debt, and the transaction is leverage neutral.

S&P's ratings reflect TransUnion's sustainable market position as
one of the top three national credit reporting agencies due to high
barriers to entry, good operating efficiency, and strong
profitability. Despite operating on a smaller scale than the other
two agencies, TransUnion's market position is defensible as
customers prefer to obtain credit information from multiple
providers. The data is often asymmetrical, requiring access to
multiple credit reports to get a complete picture.

"The ratings also reflect our view that leverage will decline and
remain below 4x on a S&P Global Ratings-adjusted basis due to
continued strong revenue growth rates and EBITDA margin expansion
supported by favorable demand across all segments, new product
introductions, and continued focus on operating efficiency. We
expect TransUnion to continue to generate strong free cash flow,
which we think it will apply toward new tuck-in acquisitions,
shareholder returns, and modest debt repayment," the rating agency
said.


US FINANCIAL: Rome-Edelton Buying Anne Arundel Property for $195K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
US Financial Capital, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland to authorize the sale of the real property in
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, consisting of lots of undeveloped
land, to Rome-Edelton, LLC, for $195,000.

On the Petition Date, the Debtor owned the Property. It is
described as follows: (i) 92 Edelton Avenue (90 Edelton Avenue)
4322-9004-4005.  Lots 1 to 5 and 8; BK; 90 Edelton Avenue; Grande
View Park - 15,960 SF Land; (ii) Edelton Avenue (lots 9-14)
4322-9006-5142, Lots 9 to 14; BK; Edelton Avenue; grande View Park
- 14,400 SF Land; and (iii) 94 Edelton Avenue (92 Edelton Avenue)
4322-9006-5142.  Lots 6 and 7; BK; 92 Edelton Avenue; Grande View
Park - 4,800 SF Land.

On July 23, 2019, the Debtor entered into a contract to sell the
Property to the Buyer.  Pursuant to the contract, the purchase
price of the Property is $195,00.  The Purchaser tendered a deposit
of $10,000 and will make a second $10,000 deposit no later than
Dec.  31, 2019.  The Debtor is not affiliated with the Purchaser.
The contract was negotiated at arms'-length and represents the fair
market value for the Property.

The contract contains an unsatisfied contingency.  It provides that
the Purchaser obtains the necessary and required permits and
approvals to immediately build on the Property.   The Purchaser has
already concluded its due diligence and study period of the
Property and closing should occur by March 15, 2020.

The parties have also agreed to evenly split the transfer and
recordation taxes.  The Debtor estimates that the transfer and
recordation taxes will be $4,000, of which the Debtor will pay
half.

The Property secures the first priority deed of trust for the
benefit of Merrit Lending, LLC.  Merritt asserts it is owed
approximately $268,530, based upon its proof of claim.  Merritt has
received payments from the Debtor in account of this lien during
the pendency of the case.  At this time, the Debtor believes that
approximately $231,780 is owed to Merritt.  The Debtor proposes to
pay the proceeds of sale, after deducting for the costs of sale, to
Merritt based upon its lien on the Property.  Merritt has not
agreed to waive any deficiency.

Additionally, real property taxes are owed to Anne Arundel County
for several years.  The Debtor estimates that Anne Arundel County
is owed approximately $3,000 for the past several years.  The
Debtor proposes to make payment to Anne Arundel County at
settlement.  To the extent taxes are owed for the current year,
those taxes will be prorated at settlement and the Debtor will pay
its share at that time.

The Debtor previously engaged the services of a real estate agent
to sell the Property.  The agreement with the realtor calls for the
agent to receive a commission of 5%.  Based upon the sale price,
the commission to the agent will be $9,750.  There will also be
minor settlement charges such as a release.  The Debtor estimates
these costs to be no more than $500.

Therefore, after deducting for the costs of sale and taxes owed,
the net proceeds will be approximately $180,000.

The Property has a tax assessed value of $82,500. Further, the
Debtor as owner avers that the Property is worth $195,000.
Therefore, the sale price represents the true value of the Property
and is reasonable.

The Property can be sold free and clear of liens if the secured
creditor consents.   In the case, Merritt has agreed to accept the
proceeds of the sale in satisfaction of its lien.  Merritt has not
agreed to waive its deficiency claim.

The Debtor's business judgment, based upon the advice of
professionals, leads it to conclude that a sale of the Property
will maximize its estate and its ability to make payments to
creditors under the Chapter 11 Plan.  Therefore, the sale of the
Property, with maximum return is in the best interest of the
Debtors' estate and all creditors.

The Debtor proposes to make the following disbursements at
settlement: 1) payment of all cost associated with settlement,
including real estate commissions and transfer taxes; 2) payment of
approximately $3,000 to Anne Arundel County on account of property
taxes owed; and 3) payment of approximately $180,000 to Merritt due
to its lien on the Property.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

      https://tinyurl.com/yx9l6j2s

                  About US Financial Capital

US Financial Capital, Inc., is a privately-held company in
Columbia, Maryland, engaged in activities related to real estate.
It is the fee simple owner of 14 real estate properties having an
aggregate value of $1.38 million.

US Financial Capital sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-14018) on March 27,
2018. In the petition signed by Ronald Talbert, chief operating
officer, the Debtor disclosed $1.38 million in assets and $13.92
million in liabilities. The Debtor hired the Law Office of David W.
Cohen as its legal counsel.



VARTEK LLC: Taps TEC Polymer to Appraise Equipment
--------------------------------------------------
Vartek, LLC, received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Florida to hire TEC Polymer, LLC.

The Debtor tapped the firm to conduct an appraisal of its equipment
and provide additional services if necessary.  

TEC estimates that its fees will be in the range of $2,000 to
$5,000, depending upon the time required to complete the appraisal.


Marcel Vezina, an appraiser employed with TEC, disclosed in court
filings that the firm is "disinterested" within the meaning of
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Marcel G. Vezina
     TEC Polymer, LLC
     1471 Rail Head Blvd.
     Naples, FL 34110
     Phone: +1.2395972000
     Email: tecpolymer@comcast.net

                      About Vartek L.L.C.

Vartek, L.L.C. -- https://vartekllc.com/ -- is a privately owned
manufacturer of flexible PVC hose and tubing.  It manufactures
reinforced hose and non-reinforced tubing products, and serves the
construction, industrial, irrigation, landscape, marine, medical,
pool, spa and waterscape markets.  Vartek maintains a warehouse in
Tampa, Fla., and a warehouse in San Diego, Calif.

Vartek sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
19-08083) on Aug. 26, 2019.  In the petition signed by William A.
Long Jr., chief restructuring officer, the Debtor was estimated to
have assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $10
million to $50 million.  Judge Catherine Peek McEwen oversees the
Debtor's case.  Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., represents
the Debtor.


VERITY HEALTH: Delays Filing of Plan to Resolve SGM Sale Issues
---------------------------------------------------------------
Verity Health System of California, Inc. asked the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to extend the period
during which only the company and its affiliates can file a Chapter
11 plan to Dec. 31, and the period to solicit acceptances for the
plan to Feb. 29, 2020.

The extension, if granted by the court, would give the companies
more time to focus on issues related to the sale of their assets to
Strategic Global Management, Inc.  A resolution of these issues is
critical to the companies' plan process.

While the bankruptcy court has approved the SGM sale, the sale is
subject to review by the California attorney general under
non-bankruptcy law.

Just recently, the bankruptcy court entered a memorandum finding,
among other things, that the SGM sale is free and clear of the
attorney general's proposed conditions. The bankruptcy court stated
it would certify the attorney general's order for direct appeal to
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

The California Department of Health Care Services objected to the
SGM sale as it related to the transfer of the Medi-Cal Provider
Agreement. Since the bankruptcy court overruled its objection, DHCS
filed an appeal of the order in the U.S. District  Court for the
Central District of California (Case No. 19-08762).

In addition, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and
the companies are currently negotiating the treatment of Medicare
Provider Agreements and related issues regarding the SGM sale, and
the parties have stipulated to a continued hearing date to Nov. 6.

                   About Verity Health System

Verity Health System -- https://www.verity.org/ -- operates as a
non-profit health care system in the state of California, with
approximately 1,680 inpatient beds, six active emergency rooms, a
trauma center, and a host of medical specialties, including
tertiary and quaternary care.  Verity's two Southern California
hospitals are St. Francis Medical Center in Lynwood and St. Vincent
Medical Center in Los Angeles.  In Northern California, O'Connor
Hospital in San Jose, St. Louise Regional Hospital in Gilroy, Seton
Medical Center in Daly City and Seton Coastside in Moss Beach are
part of Verity Health.  Verity Health also includes Verity Medical
Foundation.  

With more than 100 primary care and specialty physicians, VMF
offers medical, surgical and related healthcare services for people
of all ages at community-based, multi-specialty clinics
conveniently located in areas served by the Verity hospitals.
Verity Health System was created in a transaction approved by
California Attorney General Kamala Harris and completed in December
2015.

Verity Health System of California, Inc., and its affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Lead Case No. 18-20151) on Aug. 31, 2018.  In the petition
signed by CEO Richard Adcock, Verity Health estimated assets of
$500 million to $1 billion and liabilities of $500 million to $1
billion.  

Judge Ernest M. Robles oversees the cases.

The Debtors tapped Dentons US LLP as their bankruptcy counsel;
Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisor; Cain Brothers
as investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants as claims
agent.

The official committee of unsecured creditors formed in the case
retained Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP as counsel.


VIDANGEL INC: Trustee Taps Call & Jensen as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
George Hofmann, the Chapter 11 Trustee of VidAngel, Inc., seeks
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah
to employ Call & Jensen, P.C., as special counsel to the Debtor.

VidAngel, Inc. requires Call & Jensen to represent and advise the
Trustee regarding all aspects of litigation and defense in the
matter of Disney Enterprises et al. v. VidAngel, Inc., U.S. Dist.
Ct., Central Dist. of CA, Case No. 16-cv-04109-AB.

Call & Jensen will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                    $400
     Paraprofessionals            $215

Call & Jensen will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mark L. Eisenhut, a partner at Call & Jensen, P.C., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Call & Jensen can be reached at:

     Mark L. Eisenhut, Esq.
     CALL & JENSEN, P.C.
     610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700
     Newport Beach, CA 92660
     Tel: (949) 717-3000

                       About VidAngel Inc.

Based in Provo, Utah, VidAngel, Inc., is an entertainment platform
empowering users to filter language, nudity, violence, and other
content from movies and TV shows on modern streaming devices such
as iOS, Android, and Roku. The company's newly launched service
empowers users to filter via their Netflix, Amazon Prime, and HBO
on Amazon Prime accounts, as well as enjoy original content
produced by VidAngel Studios. Its signature original series, Dry
Bar Comedy, now features the world's largest collection of clean
standup comedy, earning rave reviews from fans nationwide.

VidAngel filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Utah Case No.
17-29073) on Oct. 18, 2017.  In the petition signed by CEO Neal
Harmon, the Debtor was estimated to have $1 million to $10 million
in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Kevin R. Anderson oversees the case.

The Debtor tapped J. Thomas Beckett, Esq., at Parsons Behle &
Latimer, as bankruptcy counsel; Durham Jones & Pinegar, Baker
Marquart LLP, and Stris & Maher LLP as special counsel; Call &
Jensen, P.C., as special counsel; and Tanner LLC as auditor and
advisor. The Debtor also hired economic consulting expert Analysis
Group, Inc.



VITA CRAFT: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Vita Craft Corporation
        1110 W. 58th Street
        Shawnee, KS 66203

Business Description: Vita Craft Corporation manufacturers
                      cookwares including pans, cutleries,
                      knives, pots, bake-wears, and skillets.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: November 1, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Kansas (Kansas City)

Case No.: 19-22358

Judge: Hon. Robert D. Berger

Debtor's Counsel: Robert J. Haupt, Esq.
                  LATHROP GAGE LLP
                  2345 Grand Boulevard Ste 1800
                  Kansas City, MO 64108
                  Tel: 816-292-2000
                  E-mail: rhaupt@lathropgage.com

Total Assets: $7,843,679

Total Liabilities: $2,698,042

The petition was signed by Gary E. Martin, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/ksb19-22358.pdf


XTL INC: Taps Buchanan Ingersoll as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
XTL, Inc., received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania to hire Buchanan Ingersoll &
Rooney PC as its special counsel.
   
The firm will represent the Debtor in government relations matters,
including those involving the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Andrew Giorgione     $510
     Matthew Fine         $220
     Kelly Neal           $470

Andrew Giorgione, Esq., at Buchanan, disclosed in court filings
that the firm has no interest adverse to the Debtor's bankruptcy
estate.

Buchana can be reached through:

     Andrew J. Giorgione, Esq.
     Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
     409 North Second Street, Suite 500
     Harrisburg, PA 17101-1357
     Phone: 717 237-4863
     Email: Andrew.giorgione@bipc.com

                          About XTL Inc.

XTL, Inc., is a transportation & logistics company that provides
customized logistics solutions for warehousing and inventory
control of commodities and finished goods.

Ootzie Properties classifies itself as a Single Asset Real Estate
(as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)) whose principal assets
are located at South 24th and Highway, 275 Industrial Council
Bluffs, Iowa.

XTL, Inc., and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 protection on
Aug. 1, 2019 (Bankr. E. D. Penn. Lead Case No. 19-14844).  In the
petition signed by Louis J. Cerone, president, XTL was estimated to
have $10 million to $50 million in assets and $10 million to $50
million in liabilities.  Hon. Eric L. Frank oversees the cases.
XTL tapped Allen B. Dubroff, Esq., at Allen B. Dubroff, Esq., &
Associates, LLC, as its counsel.


XTL-PA INC: Committee Hires Bielli & Klauder as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of XTL-PA, Inc.,
seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania to retain Bielli & Klauder, LLC, as
counsel to the Committee.

The Committee requires Bielli & Klauder to:

   a. advise the Committee with respect to its rights, duties,
      and powers in these Chapter 11 Cases;

   b. assist and advise the Committee in its consultations with
      the Debtor relative to the administration of these Chapter
      11 Cases;

   c. assist the Committee in analyzing the claims of the
      Debtor's creditors and the Debtor's capital structure and
      in negotiating with holders of claims and equality
      interests;

   d. assist the Committee in its investigation of the acts,
      conduct, assets, liabilities, and financial condition of
      the Debtor's and of the operation of the Debtor's
      business;

   e. assist the Committee in its investigation of the liens and
      claims of the holders of the Debtor's pre-petitions debt
      and the prosecution of any claims or causes of action
      revealed by such investigation;

   f. assist the Committee in its analysis of, and negotiations
      with, the Debtor or any third party concerning matters
      related to, among other things, the assumption or rejection
      of certain leases of nonresidential real property and
      executory contracts, asset dispositions, financing of other
      transactions and the terms of one or more plans or
      reorganization for the Debtor and accompanying disclosure
      statements and related plan documents;

   g. assist and advise the Committee as to its communications to
      unsecured creditors regarding significant matters in this
      Chapter 11 Case;

   h. represent the Committee at hearings and other proceedings;

   i. review and analyze applications, orders, statements of
      operations, and schedules filed with the Court and advise
      the Committee as to their propriety;

   j. assist the Committee in preparing pleadings and
      applications as may be necessary in furtherance of the
      Committee's interests and objectives;

   k. prepare, on behalf of the Committee, any pleadings,
      including without limitation, motions, memoranda,
      complaints, adversary complaints, objections, or comments
      in connection with any of the foregoing; and

   l. perform such other legal services as may be required or are
      otherwise deemed to be in the interests of the Committee in
      accordance with the Committee's powers and duties as set
      forth in the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules, or other
      applicable law.

Bielli & Klauder will be paid at these hourly rates:

     David M. Klauder, Member            $350
     Thomas Bielli, Member               $350
     Nella Bloom, Of Counsel             $300
     Kathleen J. Seligman, Of Counsel    $300
     Paraprofessionals                   $115

Bielli & Klauder will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Thomas Daniel Bielli, partner of Bielli & Klauder, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not
creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the Debtors; (b)
has not been, within two years before the date of the filing of the
Debtors' chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees of
the Debtors; and (c) does not have an interest materially adverse
to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or
equity security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect
relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtors, or
for any other reason.

Bielli & Klauder can be reached at:

     Thomas Daniel Bielli, Esq.
     BIELLI & KLAUDER, LLC
     1500 Walnut Street, Suite 900
     Philadelphia, PA 19102
     Tel: 215-642-8271
     Fax: 215-754-4177
     E-mail: tbielli@bk-legal.com

                       About XTL-PA, Inc.

XTL, Inc., is a transportation & logistics company that provides
customized logistics solutions for warehousing and inventory
control of commodities and finished goods.

Ootzie Properties classifies itself as a Single Asset Real Estate
(as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)) whose principal assets
are located at South 24th and Hwy. 275 Industrial Council Bluffs,
IA 51501.

XTL, Inc., and its subsidiaries sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. E. D. Penn. Lead Case No. 19-14843) on Aug. 1, 2019 in
Philadephia, PA.  In the petitions signed by Louis J. Cerone,
president, the Debtor was estimated to have $10 million to $50
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  

The Hon. Eric L. Frank oversees the case.  

The Debtor tapped Allen B. Dubroff, Esq. of Allen B. Dubroff, Esq.
& Associates, LLC as counsel.  

On Sept. 18, 2019, the United Trustee appointed a committee of
unsecured Creditors.  The Committee retained Bielli & Klauder, LLC,
as counsel.



[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from Oct. 28 to Nov. 1, 2019
-----------------------------------------------------------
  Company                  Ticker  Coupon  Bid Price    Maturity
  -------                  ------  ------  ---------    --------
Acosta Inc                 ACOSTA    7.75      4.608   10/1/2022
Acosta Inc                 ACOSTA    7.75      4.874   10/1/2022
Alta Mesa Holdings
  LP / Alta Mesa
  Finance Services Corp    ALTMES   7.875       11.5  12/15/2024
Approach Resources Inc     AREX         7      33.51   6/15/2021
BPZ Resources Inc          BPZR       6.5      3.017    3/1/2049
Blackboard Inc             BBBB      7.75      100.5  11/15/2019
Blackboard Inc             BBBB      7.75      99.13  11/15/2019
Bon-Ton Department
  Stores Inc/The           BONT         8      8.992   6/15/2021
Bristow Group Inc          BRS       6.25       7.04  10/15/2022
Bristow Group Inc          BRS        4.5      9.008    6/1/2023
California Resources Corp  CRC          8     41.299  12/15/2022
California Resources Corp  CRC          6     25.485  11/15/2024
California Resources Corp  CRC        5.5     35.568   9/15/2021
California Resources Corp  CRC          5     93.942   1/15/2020
California Resources Corp  CRC          8     41.314  12/15/2022
California Resources Corp  CRC          6     25.861  11/15/2024
Cenveo Corp                CVO        8.5      1.346   9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                CVO        8.5      1.346   9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                CVO          6      0.894   5/15/2024
Chaparral Energy Inc       CHAP      8.75     41.854   7/15/2023
Chaparral Energy Inc       CHAP      8.75     41.615   7/15/2023
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority    CHUKCH    9.75     49.001   5/30/2020
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority    CHUKCH   10.25         49   5/30/2020
Cloud Peak Energy
  Resources LLC /
  Cloud Peak Energy
  Finance Corp             CLD         12         23   11/1/2021
Cloud Peak Energy
  Resources LLC /
  Cloud Peak Energy
  Finance Corp             CLD      6.375       0.75   3/15/2024
DFC Finance Corp           DLLR      10.5     67.125   6/15/2020
DFC Finance Corp           DLLR      10.5     67.125   6/15/2020
Denbury Resources Inc      DNR        5.5     49.635    5/1/2022
EP Energy LLC /
  Everest Acquisition
  Finance Inc              EPENEG   9.375      1.938    5/1/2024
EP Energy LLC /
  Everest Acquisition
  Finance Inc              EPENEG       8      1.938   2/15/2025
EP Energy LLC /
  Everest Acquisition
  Finance Inc              EPENEG    7.75        0.4    9/1/2022
EP Energy LLC /
  Everest Acquisition
  Finance Inc              EPENEG   9.375       2.75    5/1/2024
EP Energy LLC /
  Everest Acquisition
  Finance Inc              EPENEG       8      2.156   2/15/2025
EP Energy LLC /
  Everest Acquisition
  Finance Inc              EPENEG    7.75       0.25    9/1/2022
EP Energy LLC /
  Everest Acquisition
  Finance Inc              EPENEG    7.75       0.25    9/1/2022
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc              ENER         3      7.875   6/15/2013
Ferrellgas Partners LP /
  Ferrellgas Partners
  Finance Corp             FGP      8.625     53.913   6/15/2020
Ferrellgas Partners LP /
  Ferrellgas Partners
  Finance Corp             FGP      8.625     56.136   6/15/2020
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc  FLTW        14      3.557  12/15/2011
Foresight Energy LLC /
  Foresight Energy
  Finance Corp             FELP      11.5      9.146    4/1/2023
Foresight Energy LLC /
  Foresight Energy
  Finance Corp             FELP      11.5      9.043    4/1/2023
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR        8.5     59.508   4/15/2020
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR       10.5     47.048   9/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR      7.125     44.919   1/15/2023
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR       8.75      46.78   4/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR       6.25     46.097   9/15/2021
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR      8.875     53.788   9/15/2020
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR       9.25     45.623    7/1/2021
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR       10.5     47.055   9/15/2022
Frontier
  Communications Corp      FTR       10.5       52.5   9/15/2022
Global Eagle
  Entertainment Inc        ENT       2.75     46.662   2/15/2035
Goodman Networks Inc       GOODNT       8       50.5   5/11/2022
Grizzly Energy LLC         VNR          9          6   2/15/2024
Grizzly Energy LLC         VNR          9          6   2/15/2024
High Ridge Brands Co       HIRIDG   8.875      0.575   3/15/2025
High Ridge Brands Co       HIRIDG   8.875      0.575   3/15/2025
Hornbeck Offshore
  Services Inc             HOS      5.875     50.006    4/1/2020
Hornbeck Offshore
  Services Inc             HOS          5     38.961    3/1/2021
Legacy Reserves LP /
  Legacy Reserves
  Finance Corp             LGCY     6.625      2.788   12/1/2021
Legacy Reserves LP /
  Legacy Reserves
  Finance Corp             LGCY         8      2.473   9/20/2023
Lehman Brothers Inc        LEH        7.5      1.847    8/1/2026
MAI Holdings Inc           MAIHLD     9.5       41.5    6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc           MAIHLD     9.5       41.5    6/1/2023
MAI Holdings Inc           MAIHLD     9.5     41.777    6/1/2023
MF Global Holdings Ltd     MF           9     15.582   6/20/2038
MF Global Holdings Ltd     MF        6.75     15.625    8/8/2016
Mashantucket Western
  Pequot Tribe             MASHTU    7.35         16    7/1/2026
McDermott Technology
  Americas Inc /
  McDermott Technology
  US Inc                   MDR     10.625     18.056    5/1/2024
McDermott Technology
  Americas Inc /
  McDermott Technology
  US Inc                   MDR     10.625     18.907    5/1/2024
Murray Energy Corp         MURREN      12      0.735   4/15/2024
Murray Energy Corp         MURREN     9.5          5   12/5/2020
Murray Energy Corp         MURREN      12       1.05   4/15/2024
Murray Energy Corp         MURREN     9.5          5   12/5/2020
NWH Escrow Corp            HARDWD     7.5     51.394    8/1/2021
NWH Escrow Corp            HARDWD     7.5     51.394    8/1/2021
Neiman Marcus Group LTD
  LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG           NMG          8     26.921  10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group LTD
  LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG           NMG       8.75     27.882  10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group LTD
  LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG           NMG       8.75     28.175  10/25/2024
Neiman Marcus Group LTD
  LLC / Neiman Marcus
  Group LLC / Mariposa
  Borrower / NMG           NMG          8     26.891  10/25/2024
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp         NGREFN   12.25      3.933   5/15/2019
New WEI Inc                WLTG       8.5      0.834   4/15/2021
Northwest Hardwoods Inc    HARDWD     7.5         52    8/1/2021
Northwest Hardwoods Inc    HARDWD     7.5     51.743    8/1/2021
PHH Corp                   PHH      6.375     58.169   8/15/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc             PTX       4.25       2.25    4/1/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc             PTX       4.25       2.25    4/1/2021
Pioneer Energy
  Services Corp            PESX     6.125     38.791   3/15/2022
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc         PWAV     1.875      0.162  11/15/2024
Powerwave
  Technologies Inc         PWAV     1.875      0.162  11/15/2024
Pyxus International Inc    PYX      9.875     60.946   7/15/2021
Pyxus International Inc    PYX      9.875      61.27   7/15/2021
Pyxus International Inc    PYX      9.875      61.27   7/15/2021
Renco Metals Inc           RENCO     11.5     24.875    7/1/2003
Riverbed Technology Inc    RVBD     8.875     46.551    3/1/2023
Riverbed Technology Inc    RVBD     8.875     47.352    3/1/2023
Rolta LLC                  RLTAIN   10.75      8.883   5/16/2018
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp             AMEPER   7.125         17   11/1/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp             AMEPER   7.375      14.75   11/1/2021
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp             AMEPER   7.125      16.91   11/1/2020
Sable Permian Resources
  Land LLC / AEPB
  Finance Corp             AMEPER   7.375     16.663   11/1/2021
Sanchez Energy Corp        SNEC     6.125      5.375   1/15/2023
Sanchez Energy Corp        SNEC      7.75      5.375   6/15/2021
SandRidge Energy Inc       SD         7.5        0.5   2/15/2023
Sears Holdings Corp        SHLD     6.625         15  10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp        SHLD     6.625     13.821  10/15/2018
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp          SHLD       7.5      1.113  10/15/2027
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp          SHLD         7      1.116    6/1/2032
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp          SHLD      6.75      1.048   1/15/2028
Sears Roebuck
  Acceptance Corp          SHLD       6.5      1.245   12/1/2028
Sempra Texas
  Holdings Corp            TXU       5.55       13.5  11/15/2014
Stearns Holdings LLC       STELND   9.375      44.96   8/15/2020
Stearns Holdings LLC       STELND   9.375      44.96   8/15/2020
Tapstone Energy LLC /
  Tapstone Energy
  Finance Corp             TAPENE    9.75         26    6/1/2022
Tapstone Energy LLC /
  Tapstone Energy
  Finance Corp             TAPENE    9.75         26    6/1/2022
Techniplas LLC             TECPLS      10         92    5/1/2020
Techniplas LLC             TECPLS      10     92.375    5/1/2020
Teligent Inc/NJ            TLGT      3.75     94.752  12/15/2019
TerraVia Holdings Inc      TVIA         5      4.644   10/1/2019
TerraVia Holdings Inc      TVIA         6      4.644    2/1/2018
Tesla Energy
  Operations Inc/DE        TSLAEN     3.6     88.646   3/19/2020
Transworld Systems Inc     TSIACQ     9.5     25.911   8/15/2021
Transworld Systems Inc     TSIACQ     9.5     25.911   8/15/2021
UCI International LLC      UCII     8.625       4.78   2/15/2019
Ultra Resources Inc        UPL      6.875         10   4/15/2022
Ultra Resources Inc        UPL      7.125         10   4/15/2025
Ultra Resources Inc        UPL      6.875     10.063   4/15/2022
Ultra Resources Inc        UPL      7.125     10.002   4/15/2025
Unit Corp                  UNTUS    6.625     66.041   5/15/2021
VIVUS Inc                  VVUS       4.5     80.632    5/1/2020
Vine Oil & Gas LP /
  Vine Oil & Gas
  Finance Corp             VRI       9.75     39.237   4/15/2023
Vine Oil & Gas LP /
  Vine Oil & Gas
  Finance Corp             VRI       8.75     38.569   4/15/2023
Vine Oil & Gas LP /
  Vine Oil & Gas
  Finance Corp             VRI       9.75     39.719   4/15/2023
Vine Oil & Gas LP /
  Vine Oil & Gas
  Finance Corp             VRI       8.75     38.656   4/15/2023
Weatherford
  International LLC        WFT      9.875       35.5    3/1/2025
Weatherford
  International LLC        WFT      9.875         31    3/1/2025
Weatherford
  International LLC        WFT      9.875         31    3/1/2025
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp  WIN        7.5      18.25    6/1/2022
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp  WIN      6.375      19.25    8/1/2023
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp  WIN       8.75         22  12/15/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp  WIN      6.375     18.828    8/1/2023
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp  WIN       8.75     18.078  12/15/2024
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp  WIN       7.75     18.436   10/1/2021
Windstream Services LLC /
  Windstream Finance Corp  WIN       7.75      18.67  10/15/2020
rue21 inc                  RUE          9      1.428  10/15/2021




                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***