/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/190522.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, May 22, 2019, Vol. 23, No. 141

                            Headlines

10 HOMESTEAD: $260K Sale of Quicy Property to Connelly Approved
1141 REALTY: Court Approves Disclosure Statement, Confirms Plan
180 ATKINS ETTZY: Seeks to Hire Vogel Bach as Counsel
8133 LEESBURG: $30M Sale of Vienna Property to Cobalt Approved
AEGERION PHARMACEUTICALS: Case Summary & 30 Unsecured Creditors

ALGONQUIN POWER: S&P Rates $350MM 2019-A Sub Notes Due 2079 'BB+'
ALPINE 4 TECHNOLOGIES: Posts $989,500 Net Income in 1st Quarter
ALVARO BETANCUR: $1.4M Sale of Boca Raton Property Approved
AMERICAN CRYOSTEM: Incurs $352,000 Net Loss in Second Quarter
AMERIPRO AUTO: June 12 Plan Confirmation Hearing

ANDREWS LOGGING: Hires Galloway Wettermark as Counsel
ANKA BEHAVIORAL: Seeks to Hire BPM LLP as Financial Advisor
ANKA BEHAVIORAL: Seeks to Hire Wendel Rosen as Legal Counsel
ASPEN MANOR: June 20 Plan Confirmation Hearing
AUGER DRILLING: Seeks to Hire DeMarco Mitchell as Counsel

AUTOMEDX LLC: Unsecured Creditors to Get $50K Under Plan
BALLANTYNE RE: June 11 Chapter 15 Recognition Hearing Set
BARKER BOATWORKS: Taps John L. Abitante CPA as Accountant
BEAVEX HOLDING: Sale Procedures for Miscellaneous Assets Approved
BEYDA ADULT: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

BREATHE RITE: Seeks to Hire Ruff & Cohen as Attorney
CANADA: RCMP Faces Inuit Abuse Lawsuit Amid Class Action
CARUGATI CONSTRUCTION: June 24 Plan Confirmation Hearing
CBAK ENERGY: Incurs $2.80 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
CECIWONG INC: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan

CLOUD PEAK: Taps Prime Clerk as Claims Agent
COVERT CANYON: Proposed Sale of Alpine Property Approved
CREATIVE GLOBAL: Committee Hires Lewis Brisbois as Counsel
DPW HOLDINGS: Incurs $6.71 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
DPW HOLDINGS: Raises $500,000 from Selling Notes with Warrants

DURHAM CONSTRUCTION: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
EAGLE REBAR: Hires Yarborough Law Firm as Special Counsel
EDGEMARC ENERGY: Advised by Davis Polk on Restructuring
ENVESTR CAPITAL: Hires Koenig Rubloff as Real Estate Broker
EVEN STEVENS: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee

FIDI DISTRICT: Seeks to Hire Wotman Law as Attorney
FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION: S&P Affirms 'B+' Debt Ratings on Add-On
FRESHSTART HOME: Seeks to Hire AREA Appraisal as Appraiser
GARY STANIS: $659K Sale of Two Gibsonton Properties Approved
GLOBAL HEALTHCARE: Delays Filing of March 31 Form 10-Q

GLOBAL HEALTHCARE: Posts $156,796 Net Income in First Quarter
GRAMERCY GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
GREGORY TE VELDE: Trustee's $100K Sale of Haywagon Denied
GREGORY TE VELDE: Trustee's Sale of Two Classic Cars Denied
GROM SOCIAL: Reports $2.28 Million Net Loss in First Quarter

HOLLANDER SLEEP: Case Summary & 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors
HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: Seeks to Hire Akin Gump as Legal Counsel
HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: Taps Houlihan Lokey as Financial Advisor
HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: Taps Prime Clerk as Administrative Advisor
HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee

INTERNATIONAL PLACE: $195M Sale of Vienna Property to T&H Approved
JOHN COBLE: $309K Sale of Delphi Property Approved
JONES ENERGY: Exits Bankruptcy After Chapter 11 Plan Confirmed
KRUGER PACKAGING: DBRS Assigns Provisional BB(high) Issuer Rating
LIBERTY MUTUAL: S&P Rates EUR500MM Junior Subordinated Debt 'BB+'

MAI HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'CCC' on Weak Operating Performance
MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE: S&P Raises ICR to 'BB-' on KCC Acquisition
NAUTILUS POWER: S&P Affirms 'B+' Senior Secured Term Loan Rating
NUSTAR LOGISTICS: S&P Rates New $500MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
O'LOUGHLIN LTD: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

PROJECT BOOST: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
QUALITY ONE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
SCOOBEEZ INC: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
SOUTHEASTERN METAL: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
ST. PETER'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive

TANGO TRANSPORT: NLC's Partial Summary Ruling Bid Partly OK'd
TMX FINANCE: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'B-' ICR
TOLL BROTHERS: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'BB+' ICR
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS WAPA: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Revenue Bond Rating
ULTRA PETROLEUM: Fitch Lowers Issuer Default Rating to 'CCC+'

UTZ QUALITY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-' on Weak Performance
VALVOLINE INC: S&P Cuts ICR to 'BB' on Weak Operating Performance
WEST CORP: S&P Cuts ICR to B- on Weaker-Than-Expected Performance
WHITING PETROLEUM: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR; Outlook Stable
YAK ACCESS: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B' ICR

YUMA ENERGY: Reports $16 Million Net Loss for First Quarter
ZILLOW GROUP: Court Denies Bid to Dismiss Securities Suit
[*] Howard Steel Joins Goodwin's Financial Restructuring Practice

                            *********

10 HOMESTEAD: $260K Sale of Quicy Property to Connelly Approved
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts authorized 10 Homestead Avenue, LLC's private sale
of the real property commonly known as Unit 1, 10 Homestead Avenue,
Quincy, MA  02169-3548 as described in a Deed dated April 8, 2013
recorded at Norfolk County Registry of Deeds, Book 31214, Page 199
and further described in a Master Deed dated April 11, 2018,
recorded at the Norfolk County Registry of Deeds, Book 35907, Page
233, to Corrina Connelly or her assignee for the price of $260,400,
pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

The closing of the sale must occur by May 15, 2019.  If the closing
of the sale of Unit One does not occur by May 15, 2019, the
Debtor's authority to sell Unit One pursuant to the Order will
terminate.

The Unit One be sold free and clear of all liens, claims, interests
and encumbrances with the same to attach to the proceeds of the
sale.

The closing agent will disburse on behalf of the Chapter 11 Debtor
the Net Proceeds from the sale to the first mortgagee, Northeast
Bank, to be applied against the amounts owed to it by the Debtor.

The net proceeds paid to Northeast Bank will apply said proceeds
first to prepetition interest (both regular and default interest),
late charges, and then to the principal of the Northeast Refinance
Balance.  Said payment will not be applied to the prepayment
penalty/charge Northeast claims due.

The Order relates only to Unit One and further that, except as
expressly noted in the Order pertaining to Unit One, all aspects of
Northeast Bank’s claims, loan arrangements, mortgages, and liens
will remain in full force and effect.

The closing agent will disburse on behalf of the Chapter 11 Debtor
the amount owed for standard closing costs including but not
limited to tax stamps, recording fees, and the Debtor's share of
property taxes and water and sewer obligations if any consistent
with
the itemization.

The broker be paid her commission and the Special Counsel be paid
his fee from the closing.

The 14-day stay required by Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) is waived.

These expenses will be paid from the proceeds of the closing:

     a. $1,188 for revenue stamps;

     b. $800 for recording fees (estimated);

     c. $11,568 for real estate taxes (estimated);

     d. $3,595 for water & sewer charges (estimated);

     e. $5,000 credit to the Buyer;

     f. $13,020 to the Debtor's broker as commission;

     g. $1,250 to the Debtor's Special Counsel;   

     h. $875 to Daniels Electric; and

     i. All remaining proceeds are to be paid to the Lender
Northeast Bank.

The three expenses listed that are identified as estimates were
estimated based on good faith at the time of the Motion and the
fees
due at the time of the April 12, 2019 closing date.  To the extent
that additional funds are necessary to satisfy the actual amount of
the Estimated Expenses at the closing, the closing agent is
authorized to pay all such amounts to the extent that those amounts
do not exceed $17,500 in the aggregate for all of the Estimated
Expenses, or such other amount as agreed to in writing by Northeast
Bank.  The expenses for water and sewer are anticipated to be
higher than the estimate due to the passage of time.

                   About 10 Homestead Avenue

10 Homestead Avenue's principal assets are located at 10 Homestead
Avenue Quincy, MA 02169. Landing at Braintree's principal assets
are located at Units 125-139B, Commercial Street Braintree, MA
02184.

10 Homestead Avenue, LLC, and its affiliate Landing at Braintree,
LLC, filed voluntary petitions seeking relief under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case no. 18-14158 and Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 18-14159, respectively) on Nov. 6, 2018.  In the
petitions signed by William T. Barry, manager, the Debtors
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.

Judge Frank J. Bailey oversees Case No. 18-14158 while the Hon.
Christopher J. Panos presides over Case No. 18-14159.

The Ann Brennan Law Offices serves as the Debtors' counsel.  The
Law Office of Lipman & White, is the special counsel.


1141 REALTY: Court Approves Disclosure Statement, Confirms Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court has issued its findings of fact, conclusions
of law, and order (I) approving the disclosure statement on a final
basis Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 1125; and (II) confirming the
First Amended Plan of Reorganization Of 1141 Realty Owner LLC and
Flatironhotel Operations LLC.

All objections to final approval of the Disclosure Statement and
confirmation of the Plan that have not been withdrawn, waived, or
settled by this Order are overruled on the merits.

The disputes between the Debtors and the Prepetition Lender are
resolved as follows:

   (a) The objection to approval of the Disclosure Statement on a
final basis and confirmation of the Plan filed by the Prepetition
Lender is withdrawn.

   (b) Section 1.31 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:
"Effective Date Payment" shall mean the payment no later than May
15, 2019 from the Exit Facility and Premier Funds to pay claims as
set forth in Article III of the Plan.

   (c) Section 1.45 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:
"Prepetition Lender's Claim" shall mean any and all Claims or
Interests of the Prepetition Lender that have been or may be
asserted by the Prepetition Lender against the Debtors, including
(i) with respect to the liens granted by the Debtors to the
Prepetition Lender on account of monies loaned prior to the
Petition Date, (ii) those granted pursuant to the stipulation and
order authorizing the use of Prepetition Lender's cash collateral,
and (iii) amounts under section 506(b) of the Bankruptcy Code that
(y) are agreed to by Debtors; or (z) are Allowed by the Bankruptcy
Court following objection by the Debtors on notice in accordance
with the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure to Prepetition
Lender's proof of claim for same.

   (d) Section 3.05 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:
Class 2 Premier Claim. In the event that the Exit Facility closes
on or before May 15, 2019, or if Premier elects to contribute
sufficient Premier Funds to pay Class 3 claims in full, the Premier
Claim shall be deemed satisfied upon the Effective Date of the Plan
with no amounts remaining due by the Debtors to Premier. Class 2
Claims are Impaired.

   (e) Section 3.06 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:
Class 3 Prepetition Lender Claim. Class 3 Claims are not impaired.
Holders of the Allowed Prepetition Lender's Claim shall be paid in
full on the Effective Date from the proceeds of the Exit Facility
as and when Allowed by the Bankruptcy Court. For the avoidance of
doubt, as set forth in paragraph 1.45 of the Plan, the Class 3
Prepetition Lender Claim shall include amounts under section 506(b)
of the Bankruptcy Code that (a) are agreed to by the Debtors; or
(b) are Allowed by the Bankruptcy Court following objection by the
Debtors on notice in accordance with the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure to Prepetition Lender's proof of claim for
same. To the extent that the Exit Facility does not close on or
before May 15, 2019, Premier shall provide additional Premier Funds
to satisfy any Allowed Prepetition Lender'sClaim provided, however,
that the May 15, 2019 closing deadline may not be extended. From
the Confirmation Date through the Effective Date, Holders of the
Allowed Prepetition Lender's Claim shall receive monthly interest
payments at the rate then-applicable with respect to the
Prepetition Lender's Claim. On the Effective Date, which shall be
no later than May 15, 2019, to the extent the Debtors dispute any
portion of the Prepetition Lender Claim, an amount sufficient to
pay such disputed portion, in full, shall be funded into the
Disputed Claims Reserve and all undisputed amounts of the
Prepetition Lender's Claim shall be paid in full. Such disputed
amounts shall accrue interest at a rate at ten percent (10%) per
annum and Prepetition Lender shall receive its reasonable
attorney's fees allowed consistent herewith and the applicable loan
documents; provided, however, that if the Bankruptcy Court
disallows by final order any portion of the disputed amounts, then
interest attributable to such disallowed portion shall also be
disallowed. Pending further agreement of the parties or further
order of the Bankruptcy Court, the Allowed amount to be paid to the
Prepetition Lender on or before May 15, 2019 shall be no less than
$28,000,000, and the Disputed Claims Reserve for the Prepetition
Lender's Claim shall be not less than the amount which is
$34,750,000 minus the amount paid to the Prepetition Lender on the
Effective Date.

   (f) Section 5.02 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as
follows: Exit Facility. The Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as
applicable, with the assistance of Premier, shall obtain the Exit
Facility in an amount sufficient to satisfy the Allowed portion of
the Prepetition Lender's Claim. The Exit Facility shall be used to
satisfy the Allowed portion of the Prepetition Lender's Claim and,
at the Reorganized Debtors' discretion, may be used to fund the
ongoing operations of the Reorganized Debtors. To the extent that
the Exit Facility does not close by May 15, 2019, Premier shall
provide additional Premier Funds to satisfy any Allowed Prepetition
Lender's Claim, provided, however, that the May 15, 2019 closing
deadline may not be extended.

The disputes between the Debtors and Robert K.Y. Chan and You Gotta
Have Faith LLC are resolved as follows, subject to the occurrence
of the Effective Date:

   (a) the objection to confirmation of the Plan filed by Chan and
You Gotta is withdrawn;

   (b) the proof of claim filed by You Gotta against Debtor 1141
Realty Owner LLC, designated Claim No. 1 on the Debtors’ claims
register, is withdrawn; and

   (c) the proof of claim filed by Chan against Debtor
Flatironhotel Operations LLC, designated Claim No. 4 on the
Debtors’ claims register, is Allowed as a Class 5 Claim in the
amount of $100,000.00.

Other Revisions to Plan:

   (a) Section 1.44 of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:
"Prepetition Lender" shall mean Wilmington Trust, N.A., solely in
its capacity as Trustee for the Benefit of the Registered Holders
of Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2015-C28, Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2015-C28 and its
successors and assigns, including, without limitation, TCG Debt
Acquisitions 2 LLC.

   (b) Section 3.09 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as
follows: Class 6 Interests. Class 6 Interests are impaired. Upon
the Effective Date, all existing membership interests in the
Debtors shall be cancelled, and the Reorganized Debtors' membership
interests shall be reissued as follows: (i) with respect to Owner,
One Hundred (100%) Percent shall be owned by Premier Nomad LLC; and
(ii) with respect to Operator, One Hundred (100%) Percent shall be
owned by Premier Nomad LLC.

   (c) Section 7.05 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as
follows: Maintenance of Disputed Claims Reserve. To the extent that
the property placed in a Disputed Claims Reserve consists of Cash,
that Cash shall be deposited in an interest-bearing account in a
financial institution that is an authorized depository under the
U.S. Trustee Operating Guidelines. The Disputed Claims Reserve
shall be closed and extinguished by the Reorganized Debtors when
all Distributions and other dispositions of Cash or other property
required to be made under the Plan from such reserves will have
been made in accordance with the terms of the Plan. To the extent
that the Disputed Claims Reserve is funded by Premier Funds, any
excess funds in the Disputed Claims Reserve which are not used to
make Distributions shall be refunded by the Debtors to Premier.

                  About 1141 Realty Owner

1141 Realty Owner LLC is the fee owner of the Flatiron Hotel, a
62-room boutique hotel located at 9 West 26th Street, a/k/a 1141
Broadway, in New York, New York.  Affiliate Flatironhotel
Operating
LLC owns the liquor licenses for the restaurant facilities within
the hotel.

1141 Realty Owner LLC and Flatironhotel Operating LLC filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
18-12341) on July 31, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Jagdish Vaswani, managing member, 1141
Realty Owner estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million. Flatironhotel estimated
$1 million to $10 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million
in liabilities.

Judge Stuart M. Bernstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard & Stevens,
LLP as their legal counsel; CR3 Partners, LLC, as crisis
management
services provider; Verdolino & Lowey, P.C. as their accountant;
and
Omni Management Group, Inc. as the administrative agent and claims
and noticing agent.


180 ATKINS ETTZY: Seeks to Hire Vogel Bach as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
180 Atkins Ettzy LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ Vogel Bach &
Horn, LLP, as counsel to the Debtor.

180 Atkins Ettzy requires Vogel Bach to:

   (a) provide the Debtor with advice and preparing all necessary
       documents regarding debt restructuring, bankruptcy and
       asset dispositions;

   (b) take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
       Debtor's estate during the pendency of this Chapter 11
       Case;

   (c) prepare on behalf of the Debtor, as debtor-in-possession,
       all necessary motions, applications, answers, orders,
       reports and papers in connection with the administration
       of this Chapter 11 Case;

   (d) counsel the Debtor with regard to its rights and
       obligations as debtor-in-possession;

   (e) appear in Court to protect the interests of the Debtor;
       and

   (f) perform all other legal services for the Debtor which may
       be necessary and proper in these proceedings and in
       furtherance of the Debtor's operations.

Vogel Bach will be paid at the hourly rate of $350.  Vogel Bach
will be paid a retainer in the amount of $7,500.

Vogel Bach will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Eric H. Horn, a partner at Vogel Bach & Horn, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Vogel Bach can be reached at:

     Eric H. Horn, Esq.
     VOGEL BACH & HORN, LLP
     30 Broad Street, 14 th Floor
     New York, NY 10004
     Tel. (212) 242-8350
     Fax: (646) 607-2075

                     About 180 Atkins Ettzy

180 Atkins Ettzy LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-41160) on February 27, 2019,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The
Debtor is represented by Eric H. Horn, Esq., at Vogel Bach & Horn,
LLP.


8133 LEESBURG: $30M Sale of Vienna Property to Cobalt Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brian F. Kenney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia authorized 8133 Leesburg Pike, LLC's private
sale of the real property located at 8133 Leesburg Pike, Vienna,
Virginia, together with the improvements thereon, to Cobalt Real
Estate Solutions, LLC for $30.4 million, pursuant to the terms and
conditions of their Post-Auction Purchase Agreement.

The Debtor conducted the Auction on April 24, 2019.  At the
Auction, Cobalt submitted the highest bid for the 8133 Property.
Also subsequent to the Auction, Thallium agreed to be the backup
bidder for the 8133 Property at a purchase price of $30.25 million
in accordance with the terms of the Thallium Agreement.

The sale is free and clear of liens, claims, and interests, with
the liens of United Bank to attach as first and second priority
liens against the proceeds, and the lien of KKM Ventures, LLC to
attach as a third priority lien against such proceeds of sale.  The
assumption of the Assumed Liabilities by Cobalt will constitute a
legal, valid and effective delegation and assignment of all Assumed
Liabilities to Cobalt and will divest the Debtor of all liability
with respect to any Assumed Liabilities following Closing.

The United Bank Compromise, the KKM Compromise, and the 8133
Compromise are all approved and the Debtor, United Bank, and KKM
are authorized and directed to implement the terms of the
Compromises.

The Closing in connection with the Agreement and the IPT Contract
will occur simultaneously and in no event later than 11:00 a.m. on
June 28, 2019, and United Bank will receive the United Bank
Settlement Payment and the other amounts referenced above and KKM
shall receive the KKM Settlement Payment and the other amounts
referenced by 3:00 p.m. on June 28, 2019.

The automatic stay provisions of Bankruptcy Code section 362 are
vacated and modified to the extent necessary to implement the terms
and conditions of the Agreement and the provisions of the Order.

The Order will be effective immediately and will not be subject to
the stay mandated by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h).

An expense reimbursement of up to $50,000 is approved in favor of
Thallium for expenses incurred by Thallium in connection with and
during the course of its attempts to purchase the 8133 Property
from the Debtor, subject to submission by Thallium to the Debtor of
invoices, receipts and other expense documentation evidencing and
justifying the amount of the Expense Reimbursement to be paid to
Thallium pursuant to the Order.  At the Closing, the Debtor will
be, and is authorized, empowered, and directed to pay the Expense
Reimbursement to Thallium from the proceeds arising from the sale
of the 8133 Property to Cobalt pursuant to the Agreement.

Thallium will remain as the backup bidder for the 8133 Property.
Should Cobalt fail to close on the purchase of the 8133 Property
under the Agreement, Thallium will proceed to purchase the 8133
Property pursuant to the terms of this Order and the Thallium
Agreement at a price of $30.25 million, provided, however, that
Thallium has waived the due diligence period specified in the
Thallium Agreement.

A full-text copy of the Agreement attached to the Order is
available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/8133_Leesburg_181_Order.pdf

The Purchaser:

          COBALT REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS, LLC
          c/o Divaris Real Estate
          4525 Main Street, Suite 900
          Virginia Beach, VA 23462
          Attn: Gerald Divads
          E-mail: gdivaris@divatis.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

          WILLIAM MULLEN
          Robert C. Dewar, Esq.
          200 South 101h Street, Suite 1600
          Richmond, VA 23219
          Telephone: (804) 420-6935

                    About 8133 Leesburg Pike

8133 Leesburg Pike, LLC, is the owner of the real property located
at 8133 Leesburg Pike, Vienna, Virginia, improved by a multi-floor,
148,482 square foot, office building built in 1981 and acquired by
the company in December 2002.  It is the Debtor's goal and
expectation in filing its Chapter 11 case to sell the Property at a
price sufficient to pay in full all of the Debtor's secured and
unsecured debt.  

8133 Leesburg Pike, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 18-10432) on Feb. 6, 2018.  The Debtor
hired Hirschler Fleisher as counsel.  Marcus & Millichap Real
Estate Investment Services, Inc., is the real estate broker.


AEGERION PHARMACEUTICALS: Case Summary & 30 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Two affiliates that simultaneously filed voluntary petitions
seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                         Case No.
    ------                                         --------
    Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Lead Case)     19-11632
        fka Metexion, Inc.
    245 First Street, Riverview II, 18th Floor
    Cambridge, MA 02142

    Aegerion Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.        19-11633

Business Description: The Debtors, together with their non-Debtor  
             
                      affiliates, including Novelion, comprise a
                      rare-disease biopharmaceutical company
                      dedicated to developing and commercializing
                      prescription drug products for individuals
                      living with rare diseases.  Headquartered in
                      Cambridge, Massachusetts, the Debtors
                      maintain operations in the United States,
                      Canada, Europe, certain countries in Latin
                      America and Japan.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 20, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Judge: Hon. Martin Glenn

Debtors' Counsel: Paul V. Shalhoub, Esq.
                  Andrew S. Mordkoff, Esq.
                  WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
                  787 Seventh Avenue
                  New York, New York 10019
                  Tel: (212) 728-8000
                  Fax: (212) 728-8111
                  Email: pshalhoub@willkie.com
                         amordkoff@willkie.com

Debtors'
Restructuring
Advisor:          AP SERVICES, LLC
                  300 N. LaSalle Street
                  Suite 1900, Chicago, Illinois 60654

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor:          MOELIS & COMPANY
                  399 Park Avenue
                  5th Floor, New York, New York 10022

Debtors'
Claims &
Noticing
Agent:            PRIME CLERK LLC
                  830 Third Avenue
                  3rd Floor, New York, New York 10022,
                  https://cases.primeclerk.com/aegerion

Estimated Assets
(on a consolidated basis): $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Liabilities
(on a consolidated basis): $100 million to $500 million

The petitions were signed by John R. Castellano, chief
restructuring officer.

A full-text copy of Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s petition is
available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-11632.pdf

Consolidated List of Debtors' 30 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. The Bank of New York                 Debt         $304,079,722
Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Attn: Michael Countryman
2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020
Chicago, IL 60602
Email: michael.countryman@bnymellon.com

2. U.S. Department of Justice        Settlement       $19,926,515
Consumer Protection Branch           Agreement
450 5th St NW Rm 6400-S
Washington, DC 20001
Tel: (292) 532-4490
Email: L.Pedersen@usdoj.gov

3. U.S. District Court of            Settlement        $3,284,263
Massachusetts                        Agreement
Attn: Lucien Adam
1 Courthouse Way
Boston, MA 02210
Tel: (617) 748-9136
Email: Lucien_Adam@mad.uscourts.gov

4. Securities and                    Settlement        $1,167,906
Exchange Commission                  Agreement
Attn: Dawn A. Edick
100 F St., NE
Washington, DC 20549
Marc Jones
Tel: (617) 573-8947
Email: jonesmarc@sec.gov

5. Choate Hall & Stewart LLP        Professional         $495,400
Two International Place              Services
Boston, MA 02110
Jack Cinquegrana
Tel: (617) 248-4002
Email: rcinquegrana@choate.com

6. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement          $455,866
Unit of California                   Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
2329 Gateway Oaks
Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95833
Saralyn M. Ang-Olson
Tel: (916) 621-1793
Email: saralyn.angolson@doj.ca.gov

7. Delaney Kester LLP                Settlement           $286,142
4505 Las Virgenes                    Agreement
Road Suite 203
Calabasas, CA 91302
Royston H. Delaney
Tel: (857) 498-0384
Email: rory@rorydelaney.com

8. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement           $254,419
Unit of Pennsylvania                 Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
1600 Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Laurie A. Malone
Tel: (717) 783-1481
Email: lmalone@attorneygeneral.gov

9. Veeva Systems, Inc.               Trade Payable       $249,525
PO Box 740434             
Los Angeles, CA
90074-0434
Debra Lavender Barry
Email: debra.lavender@veeva.com

10. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement         $136,803
Unit of Ohio                          Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
150 East Gay Street, 17th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Keesha Mitchell
Tel: (614) 466-0722
Email: keesha.mitchell@ohioattorneygeneral.gov

11. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement          $120,984
Unit of New York                      Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
120 Broadway, 13th Floor
New York, NY 10271
Amy Held
Tel: (212) 417-5250
Email: amy.held@ag.ny.gov

12. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement          $115,990
Unit of Indiana                       Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
8005 Castleway Drive
Indianapolis, IN 46250-1946
Matthew Whitmire
Tel: (317) 915-5303
Email: matthew.whitmire@atg.in.gov

13. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement           $91,718
Unit of Kentucky                       Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
1024 Capital Center Drive
Frankfort, KY 40601
Michelle Rudovich
Tel: (502) 696-5405
Email: michelle.rudovich@ky.gov

14. Arizona Health Care               Settlement           $85,302
Cost Containment                      Agreement
System Steve
Duplissis, Section Chief
Arizona Attorney General
1275 W. Washington
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Steve Duplissis
Tel: (602) 542-3881
Email: steve.duplissis@azag.gov

15. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement           $81,820
Unit of Oklahoma                      Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
313 N.E. 21st Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
Ms. Mykel Fry
Tel: (405) 522-2962
Email: mykel.fry@oag.ok.gov

16. Medicaid Fraud Control            Settlement          $80,779
Unit of Florida                        Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
PL - 01 The Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
James D. Varnado
Tel: (850) 414-3488
Email: james.varnado@myfloridalegal.com

17. Hogan Lovells US LLP             Professional         $69,859
1200 17th Street                       Services
Denver, CO 80202
Bill Kettlewell
Tel: (617) 371-1005
Email: bill.kettlewell@hoganlovells.com

18. Nutter, Mcclennen &              Professional         $61,455
Fish, LLP                              Services
Seaport West
155 Seaport Boulevard
Boston, MA 02110-2604
Ian Roffman
Tel: (617) 439-2421
Email: iroffman@nutter.com

19. Medicaid Fraud Control           Settlement           $53,952
Unit of Michigan                      Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
2860 Eyde Parkway
East Lansing, MI 48823
David Tanay
Tel: (517) 241-6509
Email: tanayd@michigan.gov

20. Clements & Pineault LLP          Professional         $51,717
24 Federal Street, 3rd                Services
Floor Boston, MA 02110
Ben Clements
Tel: (857) 445-0133
Email: bclements@clementspineault.com

21. State Of Indiana                   Rebates            $46,054
Rebates Indiana
Medicaid Drug Rebates
26593 Network Places
Chicago, IL 60673
Allison Taylor
Tel: (317) 233-4455

22. Skillsoft Corporation            Professional         $43,606
300 Innovative Way,                    Services
Suite 201
Nashua, NH 03062
Penne Childs
Tel: (506) 462-1354
Email: penne.childs@skillsoft.com

23. Mosaic Solutions                    Trade             $43,600
Group, LLC 625 Molly                   Payable
Lane, Suite 100
Woodstock, GA 30189
Rob Kime
Tel: (678) 809-4407
Email: rob.kime@mosaicsg.com

24. Medicaid Fraud Control           Settlement           $39,049
Unit of Nevada                        Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
555 East Washington
Ave., Ste. 3900
Las Vegas, NV 89101
Mark N. Kemberling
Tel: (702) 486-3111
Email: mkemberling@ag.nv.gov

25. Medicaid Fraud Control           Settlement           $38,985
Unit of Texas                         Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
6330 Hwy 290 East, Suite 250
Austin, TX 78723
Stormy Kelly
Tel: (512) 371-4767
Email: stormy.kelly@oag.texas.gov

26. Medicaid Fraud Control           Settlement           $35,543
Unit of Wisconsin                     Agreement
Office of the Attorney General
17 W. Main Street
Madison, WI 53703
Francis Sullivan
Tel: (608) 267-2222
Email: sullivanfx@doj.state.wi.us

27. Winter Wyman Finance                Trade             $35,483
Contracting Inc.                       Payable
P.O. Box 845054
Boston, MA 02284-5054
Mark Shaefer
Tel: (781) 530-3118
Email: mschaefer@winterwyman.com

28. Valhalla Corp                       Trade             $35,431
177 Western Ave.                       Payable
Suite 2
St. Johnsbury, VT 05819
David Giacobbe
Tel: (877) 874-3418
Email: info@valhalla-inc.com

29. Porzio Life Sciences, LLC        Professional        $32,500
P.O. Box 1997                         Services
100 Southgate Parkway
Morristown, NJ 07962
Frank Fazio
Tel: (973) 889-4202
Email: fazio@porziols.com

30. LibbyHoopes, P.C.                Professional        $32,225
399 Boylston Street                    Services
Ste 200
Boston, MA 02116
Tom Hoopes
Tel: (617) 338-9300
Email: thoopes@libbyhoopes.com


ALGONQUIN POWER: S&P Rates $350MM 2019-A Sub Notes Due 2079 'BB+'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level rating to
Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.'s (APUC) $350 million series
2019-A subordinated notes due 2079. The company intends to apply
the net proceeds from these notes towards the repayment of existing
indebtedness, its previously-announced acquisition of Enbridge Gas
New Brunswick Limited Partnership and for general corporate
purposes.

S&P classifies these notes as hybrid securities with intermediate
equity content (50%). It rates the securities two notches below its
'BBB' long-term issuer credit rating on APUC to reflect their
subordination and the company's ability to defer interest payments
on the notes. S&P's intermediate equity treatment is premised on
the instrument's permanence, subordination, and deferability
features.

The security's long-dated nature, along with the company's limited
ability and lack of incentives to redeem the issue for a long-dated
period, meets S&P's standards for permanence. In addition, the
interest payments are deferrable, which fulfills the deferability
element. The instrument is also subordinated to all of APUC's
existing and future senior debt obligations, thereby satisfying the
condition for subordination.

  Ratings List

  Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
  Issuer Credit Rating                      BBB/Stable/--

  New Rating

  Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp.
  Subordinated
  $350 mil fixed-to-floating rate notes due 2079 BB+


ALPINE 4 TECHNOLOGIES: Posts $989,500 Net Income in 1st Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Alpine 4 Technologies Ltd. filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 20, 2019, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q reporting net income of $989,511 on $7.12 million of revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss
of $661,078 on $2.60 million of revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, Alpine 4 had $26.81 million in total assets,
$32.27 million in total liabilities, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $10.45 million.

The Company has financed its operations since inception from the
sale of common stock, capital contributions from stockholders and
from the issuance of notes payable and convertible notes payable.

Alpine 4 said, "We expect to continue to finance our operations
from our current operating cash flow and by the selling shares of
our common stock and or debt instruments.

"Management expects to have sufficient working capital for
continuing operations from either the sale of its products or
through the raising of additional capital through private offerings
of our securities.  Additionally, the Company is monitoring
additional businesses to acquire which management hopes will
provide additional operating revenues to the Company. There can be
no guarantee that the planned acquisitions will close or that they
will produce the anticipated revenues on the schedule anticipated
by management.

"The Company also may elect to seek bank financing or to engage in
debt financing through a placement agent.  If the Company is unable
to raise sufficient capital from operations or through sales of its
securities or other means, we may need to delay implementation of
our business plans.

"The Company has incurred losses since inception and had
accumulated a deficit of $27,530,583 as of March 31, 2019.  The
Company requires capital for its contemplated operational and
marketing activities.  The Company's ability to raise additional
capital through the future issuances of common stock is unknown.
The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development
of the Company's contemplated plan of operations, and its
transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations
are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability
to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The
financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments
that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned
uncertainties.  Our net operating losses increase the difficulty in
meeting such goals and there can be no assurances that such methods
will prove successful.  Our financial statements contain additional
note disclosures describing the management's assessment of our
ability to continue as a going concern."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/qJjSt6

                   About Alpine 4 Technologies

Alpine 4 Technologies Ltd. is a holding company that owns five
operating subsidiaries: ALTIA, LLC; Quality Circuit Assembly, Inc.;
American Precision Fabricators, Inc.; Morris Sheet Metal, Corp; and
JTD Spiral, Inc.  Alpine 4 is a technology company that primarily
provides electronic contract manufacturing solutions in the Unites
states.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm
MaloneBailey, LLP on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, includes an explanatory paragraph stating
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and
has a net capital deficiency that raises substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company reported a net loss of $7.90 million in 2018 following
a net loss of $2.99 million in 2017.


ALVARO BETANCUR: $1.4M Sale of Boca Raton Property Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mindy A. Mora of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida authorized Alvaro Betancur's sale of the real
property located at located at 581 Phillips Dr., Boca Raton,
Floridat to Virtuoso LC or its assigns for $1.38 million pursuant
to the AS IS Residential Contract For Sale and Purchase dated April
18, 2019.

The Debtor is authorized to pay the usual and customary closing
costs from the proceeds of sale and to pay the first mortgage
described as follows: Mortgage in the original principal amount of
$701,250, executed by Alvaro L. Betancur, a single man in favor of
Washington Mutual Bank, FA, recorded Jan. 6, 2004 in Book 16406,
Page 264; together with Assignment of Mortgage to JP Morgan Chase
Bank, National Association, recorded April 3, 2015 in Book 27442,
Page 418 and subsequent Assignment of Mortgage to Deutsche Bank
National Trust Co., as Trustee for Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-9, recorded April
3, 2015 in Book 27442, Page 419.

The Property will be sold free and clear of the following recorded
judicial liens, arising from the Judgments described below, which
were avoided by the Court's Order Granting Motion to Avoid Judicial
Liens:

      a)  Judgment in favor of Regions Bank, recorded in Official
Records Book 25596, Page 1588, of the Public Records of Palm Beach
County, Florida.

     b) Judgment in favor of Portofolio Recovery Associates, LLC
recorded in Official Records Book 25641, Page 1010 of the Public
Records of Palm Beach County, Florida.

     c)  Judgment in favor of the LVNV Funding LLC recorded in
Official Records Book 27235, Page 46 of the Public Records of Palm
Beach County, Florida.

Alvaro Betancur sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No. 18-22308) on Oct. 3, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Susan D. Lasky,
Esq., as counsel.


AMERICAN CRYOSTEM: Incurs $352,000 Net Loss in Second Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
American Cryostem Corporation filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 20, 2019, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q reporting a net loss of $352,103 on $44,320 of total revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss
of $207,703 on $240,583 of total revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2018.

For the six months ended March 31, 2019, American Cryostem reported
a net loss of $646,533 on $159,711 of total revenues compared to a
net loss of $762,096 on $779,849 of total revenues for the six
months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, American Cryostem had $1.26 million in total
assets, $2.23 million in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $966,817.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had a cash balance of $19,550 a
decrease of $48,770 since Sept. 30, 2018, its fiscal year end.
Operations used $48,770 of the Company's cash.  The Company used
$33,798 in cash for investments including $25,678 for the purchase
of lab equipment and $8,120 in patent development and maintenance.
The main sources of cash provided by financing activities including
new equity issuances and an additional loan from ACS Global, Inc.
and from licensing fees during the six months ended March 31,
2019.

The Company's accounts receivable increased to $305,283 at March
31, 2019 from $217,318 at Sept. 30, 2018 mainly due from Baoxin for
licensing fees.  Convertible debt increased to $373,500.

American Cryostem said, "The Company will continue to focus on its
financing and investment activities but should we be unable to
raise sufficient funds, we will be required to curtail our
operating plans if not cease them entirely.  We cannot assure you
that we will generate the necessary funding to operate or develop
our business.  In the event that we are able to obtain the
necessary financing to move forward with our business plan, we
expect that our expenses will increase significantly as we attempt
to grow our business.  Accordingly, the above estimates for the
financing required may not be accurate and must be considered in
light these circumstances."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/3yl68J

                  About American CryoStem

Eatontown, New Jersey-based American CryoStem Corporation (OTC:
CRYO), founded in 2008, is a biotechnology company, standardizing
adipose tissue (fat) derived technologies (Adult Stem Cells) for
the fields of Regenerative and Personalized Medicine.  The Company
operates a state-of-art, FDA-registered, laboratory in New Jersey
and licensed laboratories in Hong Kong, Bangkok, Thailand, China
and Tokyo, Japan, which operate on its proprietary platform,
dedicated to the collection, processing, bio-banking, culturing and
differentiation of adipose tissue and adipose derived stem cells
(ADSCs) for current or future use in regenerative medicine.  CRYO
maintains a strategic portfolio of intellectual property (IP) that
surrounds its proprietary technology which supports a growing
pipeline of stem cell applications and biologic products.  The
Company is leveraging its platform and a developed product
portfolio to create a global footprint of licensed laboratory
affiliates, domestic and international physicians networks and
research organizations who purchase tissue collection, processing
and storage consumables from CRYO.  The Company has also secured a
number of online domain names relevant to its business, including
http://www.americancryostem.com/and
http://www.acslaboratories.com/

American CryoStem reported a net loss of $1.49 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of $1.22 million on
$1.86 million of total revenues for the year ended Sept. 30, 2017.
As of Sept. 30, 2018, American CryoStem had $1.26 million in total
assets, $1.96 million in total liabilities, and a total
shareholders' deficit of $700,446.

Fruci & Associates II, PLLC, the Company's auditor since 2017,
issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Sept. 30, 2018, citing that
the Company has incurred significant losses since inception.  This
factor raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  The Company plans to continue to fund
its operations through fundraising activities in fiscal 2019 to
fund future operations and business expansion.


AMERIPRO AUTO: June 12 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan filed by
Ameripro Auto Glass, LLC, is conditionally approved.

June 12, 2019, is fixed for the hearing on final approval of the
disclosure statement and for the hearing on confirmation of the
plan. The hearing will be held at 2:30 p.m., in 4th Floor Courtroom
D, 300 North Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Florida.

Creditors and other parties in interest shall file with the court
their written ballots accepting or rejecting the Plan no later than
nine(9) days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

Any objections to Disclosure or Confirmation shall be filed and
served seven (7) days before June 12, 2019.

              About Ameripro Auto Glass

Ameripro Auto Glass, LLC, filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-04358) on Dec. 14, 2018, estimating under $1 million in both
assets and liabilities.  Jason A. Burgess, Esq. at The Law Offices
of Jason A. Burgess, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  Johnson and
Johnson, Attorneys at Law, P.A., is the special counsel.


ANDREWS LOGGING: Hires Galloway Wettermark as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Andrews Logging, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Alabama to employ Galloway
Wettermark & Rutens, LLP, as attorney to the Debtor.

Andrews Logging requires Galloway Wettermark to:

   a. give the Debtor advice with respect to its powers and
      duties as debtor-in-possession in the continued operation
      of its business and management of its property;

   b. protect the interest of the Debtor and debtor-in-possession
      in connection with lawsuits filed by the Debtor;

   c. prepare the Debtor as debtor-in-possession such
      applications, answers, orders, reports and other legal
      papers; and

   d. perform all other legal services for the Debtor-in-
      possession which may be necessary herein.

Galloway Wettermark will be paid based upon its normal and usual
hourly billing rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

J. Willis Garrett, III, a partner of Galloway Wettermark, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Galloway Wettermark can be reached at:

        J. Willis Garrett, III, Esq.
        GALLOWAY WETTERMARK & RUTENS, LLP
        3263 Cottage Hill Rd.
        Mobile, AL 36606
        Tel: (251) 476-4493
        E-mail: wgarrett@gallowayllp.com

                     About Andrews Logging

Andrews Logging, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 19-10868) on March 15,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.  The
case is assigned to Judge Jerry C. Oldshue.  Galloway, Wettermark &
Rutens, LLP, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


ANKA BEHAVIORAL: Seeks to Hire BPM LLP as Financial Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------
Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. seeks authority from the  U.S.
Bankruptcy Code for the Northern District of California to hire BPM
LLP as its financial advisor.

The firm will provide services in connection with the
administration of the Debtor's Chapter 11 case, which include
advising the management and Board of Directors regarding its
financial condition and outlook; providing forward-looking cash
forecasts; advising the management regarding alternatives for the
Debtor's financial restructuring; and assisting the Debtor with
cash management.

Russell Burbank, senior managing director of BPM, will be primarily
responsible for the services to the Debtor. He will be paid at a
reduced hourly rate of $575 (not to exceed $4,600 per day) and will
receive reimbursement for work-related expenses.

Mr. Burbank disclosed in a court filing that his firm is
"disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Russell K. Burbank
     BPM LLP
     600 California Street, Suite 600
     San Francisco, CA 94108
     Phone: 415-421-5757
     Fax: 415-288-628

                About ANKA Behavioral Health

In operation since 1973, Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. --
https://www.ankabhi.org -- is a 501(c)3 non-profit behavioral
healthcare corporation.  It offers crisis residential treatment,
transitional residential treatment, and long-term residential
treatment for children and adults experiencing a psychiatric
emergency or behavioral crisis.  Anka's residential-based
facilities are located in Contra Costa, Alameda, Solano, Sonoma,
Santa Clara, Fresno, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los
Angeles, and Riverside Counties in California, and Tuscola County
in Michigan.

ANKA Behavioral Health sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 19-41025) on April 30,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between
$10 million and $50 million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge William J. Lafferty.  

The Debtor tapped Trodella & Lapping, LLP and Wendel, Rosen, Black
& Dean, LLP as legal counsel; BPM LLP as financial advisor; and
Donlin Recano & Company, Inc. as claims and noticing agent.


ANKA BEHAVIORAL: Seeks to Hire Wendel Rosen as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code for the Northern District of California to hire
Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP as its legal counsel.

Wendel Rosen will provide services in connection with the
administration of the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.  The firm's
standard hourly rates are:

     Attorneys    $345 - $620
     Paralegals   $165 - $300

Tracy Green, Esq., a partner at Wendel Rosen, attests that the firm
neither holds nor represents an interest adverse to the Debtor's
estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Tracy Green, Esq.
     Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP
     1111 Broadway, 24th Floor
     Oakland, CA 94607-4036
     Tel: 510-834-6600
     Fax: 510-808-4658
     Email: dgoldman@wendel.com

                About ANKA Behavioral Health

In operation since 1973, Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. --
https://www.ankabhi.org -- is a 501(c)3 non-profit behavioral
healthcare corporation.  It offers crisis residential treatment,
transitional residential treatment, and long-term residential
treatment for children and adults experiencing a psychiatric
emergency or behavioral crisis.  Anka's residential-based
facilities are located in Contra Costa, Alameda, Solano, Sonoma,
Santa Clara, Fresno, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los
Angeles, and Riverside Counties in California, and Tuscola County
in Michigan.

ANKA Behavioral Health sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 19-41025) on April 30,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets
of between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of between
$10 million and $50 million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge William J. Lafferty.  

The Debtor tapped Trodella & Lapping, LLP and Wendel, Rosen, Black
& Dean, LLP as legal counsel; BPM LLP as financial advisor; and
Donlin Recano & Company, Inc. as claims and noticing agent.


ASPEN MANOR: June 20 Plan Confirmation Hearing
----------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan of Aspen
Manor Condominium Association, Inc. is approved.

June 20, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. is fixed as the date and time for the
hearing on confirmation of the plan.

Written acceptances, rejections or objections to the plan referred
to above shall be filed with the attorney for the plan proponent
not less than seven (7) days before the hearing on confirmation of
the plan.

         About Aspen Manor Condominium Association

Aspen Manor Condominium Association, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-30224) on Oct. 10,
2018.  In the petition signed by Leslie C. Scheckman, president,
the Debtor estimated less than $500,000 in assets and less than $1
million in debt.  The Debtor hired Greenbaum Rowe Smith & Davis
LLP, as its attorney; Hill Wallack, LLP, as its special counsel;
and Feldman Sablosky Massoni as its accountant.


AUGER DRILLING: Seeks to Hire DeMarco Mitchell as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Auger Drilling, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ DeMarco
Mitchell, PLLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Auger Drilling requires DeMarco Mitchell to:

   a. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
      Estate, including the prosecution of actions on its behalf,
      the defense of any actions commenced against it,
      negotiations concerning all litigation in which it is
      involved, and objecting to claims;

   b. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary motions,
      applications, answers, orders, reports, and papers in
      connection with the administration of the estate herein;

   c. formulate, negotiate, and propose a plan of reorganization;
      and

   d. perform all other necessary legal services in connection
      with these proceedings.

DeMarco Mitchell will be paid at these hourly rates:

        Attorneys            $300 to $350
        Paralegals               $125

The Debtor paid DeMarco Mitchell a retainer of $27,000.  DeMarco
Mitchell has incurred fees of $13,177.50, and filing fees of $1,717
prior to the Petition Date.  The remaining balance held in trust by
the firm is $12,105.50.

DeMarco Mitchell will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Robert T. DeMarco, a partner at DeMarco Mitchell, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

DeMarco Mitchell can be reached at:

          Robert T. DeMarco, Esq.
          Michael S. Mitchell, Esq.
          DEMARCO MITCHELL, PLLC
          1255 W. 15th Street, 805
          Plano, TX 75075
          Tel: (972) 578‐1400
          Fax: (972) 346‐6791
          E-mail: robert@demarcomitchell.com
                  mike@demarcomitchell.com

                     About Auger Drilling

Founded in 1995, Auger Drilling -- http://www.augerdrilling.com/--
is a privately held company that operates in the foundation
drilling industry.  The Company's capabilities include straight
shaft, permanent or temporary cased, belled and battered drilled
piers.  It serves the states of Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas.

Auger Drilling, Inc., based in Irving, TX, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 19-31410) on April 25, 2019.
In the petition signed by Coyle, W. Whitten, president, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
The Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale oversees the case. Robert T. DeMarco,
Esq., at DeMarco Mitchell, PLLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


AUTOMEDX LLC: Unsecured Creditors to Get $50K Under Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
AutoMedx LLC filed a Chapter 11 Plan and accompanying Disclosure
Statement providing that holders of allowed General Unsecured
Claims will receive cash on the Effective Date in the amount of
their pro rate share of $50,0000.

If a holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim has a claim the
amount of which represents 10% of the total amount of all allowed
General Unsecured Claims, that holder will receive $5,000 in cash
on the Effective Date.  The remainder of each holder's allowed
General Unsecured Claim will be paid in four subsequent
distributions of approximately $229,252, the first of which will
occur on December 31, 2019 (assuming an Effective Date of August
31, 2019), and the remainder of which will occur on a quarterly
basis thereafter until the final payment is made on September 30,
2020.  The Debtor estimates that the aggregate amount of claims in
Class 3 is approximately $967,008.

The source of funding for distributions under the Plan will come
from the Debtor's and the Reorganized Debtor's ongoing business
operations; i.e., the cash that is generated from the sale of its
products, which the Debtor anticipates will be sufficient to pay
all allowed claims in accordance with the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated May 9, 2019, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y2rtwrc8 from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

The Plan was filed by Judith W. Ross, Esq., Eric Soderlund, Esq.,
Rachael L. Smiley, Esq., and Jessica Lewis, Esq., at Ross & Smith,
PC, in Dallas, Texas.

                   About AutoMedx LLC

AutoMedx LLC -- http://automedx.com-- manufactures pre-hospital  
ventilators for military and civilian applications.  It is ISO
13485 certified and is headquartered in Coppell, Texas.   

AutoMedx sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Texas Case No. 18-42355) on Oct. 19, 2018.  In the
petition signed by James Evans, president and chief executive
officer, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Brenda T.
Rhoades presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped the Law Offices
of Judith W. Ross as its legal counsel.


BALLANTYNE RE: June 11 Chapter 15 Recognition Hearing Set
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
scheduled a hearing to consider the relief requested by Adrian
Masterson, as the authorized foreign representative of Ballantyne
Re PLC, for recognition of foreign main proceeding, recognition of
foreign representative, recognition of sanction order and related
scheme, and related relief under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code, on June 11, 2019, at 2:00 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time)
before the Hon. James L. Garrity, Jr., in Room 61, One Bowling
Green in New York, New York 10004-1408.  Objections, if any, must
be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) on May
29, 2019.

Ballantyne Re is subject of reorganization proceedings under the
Companies Act before the Irish Court.

Founded in 2005, Ballantyne Re PLC, which offers reinsurance
services, filed petition under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 19-11491) on May 7, 2019, to seek
recognition of proceedings under the Companies Act of 2014, an
Irish statute, pending                      before the High Court
of Ireland.  Adrian Masterson, the foreign representative, signed
the petition.  Timothy E. Graulich, Esq., of Davis Polk & Wardwell
LLP, is the U.S. counsel.


BARKER BOATWORKS: Taps John L. Abitante CPA as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------
Barker Boatworks, LLC received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire John L. Abitante
C.P.A., P.A. as its accountant.

The firm will prepare monthly operating reports for the Debtor and
will provide other accounting services necessary to administer its
bankruptcy estate.

John Abitante, the firm's accountant designated to provide the
services, will charge an hourly fee of $325.  The hourly rates for
other professionals and staff range between $275 and $325.

Mr. Abitante disclosed in court filings that his firm is
disinterested as defined by Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.


The firm can be reached at:

     John L. Abitante, CPA
     John L. Abitante C.P.A., P.A.
     d/b/a Abitante and Associates
     13670 Robert Rd.
     Bokeelia, FL 33922-2228
     Phone: (954) 389-1098
     Email: jabitante@jla-cpa.com

                    About Barker Boatworks

Founded in 2014 by its current president, Kevin Barker, Barker
Boatworks, LLC designs and builds boats.  All Barker boats are
"built to order" to the exact specifications of the customer's
request.

Barker Boatworks sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-03138) on April 5,
2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
between $1 million and $10 million and liabilities of the same
range.  The case is assigned to Judge Michael G. Williamson.
Stichter Riedel Blain & Postler, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.


BEAVEX HOLDING: Sale Procedures for Miscellaneous Assets Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware authorized the procedures established by
Beavex Holding Corp. and its debtor-affiliates for the sale of
certain miscellaneous assets outside the ordinary course of
business.

The Debtors are authorized to sell the Miscellaneous Assets in
accordance with these procedures:

     a. If the sale consideration from a purchaser of the
Miscellaneous Assets does not exceed $25,000, on a per-transaction
basis, and if the sale is not to an insider, the Debtors may sell
the assets upon providing written notice, via electronic mail and
(if available) overnight delivery, to (i) the Office of the United
States Trustee for the District of Delaware, 844 King Street, Room
2207, Lockbox 35, Wilmington, DE 19801 Attn: Jaclyn Weissgerber,
Esq. (Jaclyn.weissgerber@usdoj.gov), (ii) counsel to the DIP Lender
and Prepetition Secured Parties, (a) Winston & Strawn LLP, 200 Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10166, Attn. Carey D. Schreiber, Esq.
(cschreiber@winston.com), and (b) Ashby & Geddes, 500 Delaware
Avenue, Wilmington, DE 19899, Attn: Gregory A. Taylor, Esq.
(gtaylor@ashbygeddes.com), (iii) counsel to the Committee, (a)
Brown Rudnick LLP, Seven Times Square, New York, NY 10036, Attn:
Bennett S. Silverberg, Esq. (bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com), and (b)
Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, 1201 North Market Street, Suite
2300, Wilmington, DE 19801, Attn: Mark Minuti
(mark.minuti@saul.com), (iv) all known parties holding or asserting
liens, claims, encumbrances or other interests in the assets being
sold and their respective counsel, if known, and (v) those parties
requesting notice pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2002, which will have
five business days (unless extended by agreement from the Debtors)
from the receipt of such notice to inform the Debtors in writing
that they object to the proposed sale.  Such notice will include:
(i) a description of the Miscellaneous Assets that are the subject
of the Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale; (ii) the location of the
Miscellaneous Assets; (iii) the economic terms of such proposed
sale; (iv) appraisal information for the Miscellaneous Assets being
sold or transferred, to the extent applicable and available; and
(v) the identity of any non-Debtor party to the Proposed
Miscellaneous Asset Sale and specify whether that party is an
"affiliate" or "insider" as those terms are defined under section
101 of the Bankruptcy Code.  If no written objection is received
from the Notice Parties, the Debtors may consummate the Proposed
Miscellaneous Asset Sale, without further notice to any other party
and without the need for a hearing, upon entry of an order of the
Court submitted under certification of counsel in accordance with
these procedures, and upon entry of such order, such Proposed
Miscellaneous Asset Sale will be deemed fully authorized by the
Court.  If a timely written objection is received from the Notice
Parties, the Debtors will comply with the procedures set forth in
subparagraph (e) below.

     b. If the sale consideration from a purchaser for the
Miscellaneous Assets, on a per-transaction basis, exceeds $25,000
but is less than $100,000, or if the sale is to an insider in an
amount less than $100,000, the Debtors will file with the Court a
notice of such Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale and serve such
Miscellaneous Asset Sale Notice by via electronic mail and (if
available) overnight delivery on the Notice Parties.

     c. The Miscellaneous Asset Sale Notice, to the extent that the
Debtors have such information, will include:  (i) a description of
the Miscellaneous Assets that are the subject of the Proposed
Miscellaneous Asset Sale; (ii) the location of the Miscellaneous
Assets; (iii) the economic terms of sale; (iv) appraisal
information for the Miscellaneous Assets being sold or transferred,
to the extent applicable and available; and (v) the identity of any
non-Debtor party to the Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale and
specify whether that party is an "affiliate" or "insider" as those
terms are defined under section 101 of the Bankruptcy Code.

     d. The Notice Parties will have five business days (unless
extended by agreement from the Debtors) after the Miscellaneous
Asset Sale Notice is filed and served to advise the Debtors and
counsel to the Debtors in writing with specific and particular
bases that they object to the Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale
described in such Miscellaneous Asset Sale Notice.  If no written
objection is received by the Objection Deadline, the Debtors may
consummate the Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale, without further
notice to any other party and without the need for a hearing, upon
entry of an order of thes Court submitted under certification of
the counsel in accordance with these procedures, and upon entry of
such order, such Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale will be deemed
fully authorized by the Court.

     e. If a written objection to a Proposed Miscellaneous Asset
Sale is timely received by the Objection Deadline, the Debtors will
not proceed with the Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale unless (i)
the objection is withdrawn or otherwise resolved; or (ii) the Court
approves the Proposed Miscellaneous Asset Sale at the next
regularly scheduled omnibus hearing that is at least three business
days after receipt by the Debtors of a Notice Party's objection, or
at the next omnibus hearing in these Chapter 11 Cases that is
agreed to by the objecting party and the Debtors.

     f. All buyers will acquire the Miscellaneous Assets sold by
the Debtors pursuant to these Miscellaneous Asset Sale Procedures
on an "as is-where is" basis without any representations or
warranties from the Debtors as to the quality or fitness of such
assets for either their intended or any other purposes; provided,
however, that buyers will take title to the Miscellaneous Assets
free and clear of liens, claims, encumbrances and other interests
pursuant to section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, with all such
liens, claims, encumbrances and other interests, if any, to attach
to the proceeds of the sale of the Miscellaneous Assets

Any sale of Miscellaneous Assets pursuant to the Order will be free
and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances whatsoever, with
any such liens, claims and encumbrances to attach to the proceeds
of the sale.

Upon the closing of any sale of the Miscellaneous Assets, the
Debtors will pay directly to the DIP Lender from the net proceeds
of the sale received at closing, including cash or other
consideration, an amount sufficient to pay and satisfy in full and
in immediately available funds, without deduction or setoff, any
and all DIP Facility Obligations and all other amounts due the DIP
Lender under the DIP Note in accordance with the terms of the Final
DIP Order, which payment will be indefeasible once made, and not
subject to recovery, diminution, reduction or reversal on any
basis.  After indefeasible payment in full in cash and other
consideration of the DIP Facility Obligations, on the closing of
any sale of the Miscellaneous Assets, the Debtors will pay directly
to the Prepetition Secured Parties from the proceeds of the sale of
the Miscellaneous Assets any and all cash in immediately available
funds and other consideration, without deduction or setoff, to
satisfy obligations due the Prepetition Secured Parties under the
Prepetition Financing Documents, which payment will be indefeasible
once made, and not subject to recovery, diminution, reduction or
reversal on any basis.  

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Order or
otherwise, the liens and claims of the Prepetition Secured Parties
and DIP Lender pursuant to the Final DIP Order, the DIP Note, and
the Prepetition Financing Documents will attach to the Debtors'
remaining net cash proceeds of the sale of Miscellaneous Assets.

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rule 6004
or otherwise, the terms and conditions of this Order will be
immediately effective and enforceable.

                  About Beavex Holding Corp

Founded in 1989, BeavEx Incorporated and its affiliates --
https://beavex.com/ -- are providers of ground and air
transportation, warehousing and courier services, providing "last
mile" delivery services, often consisting of controlled substances
or otherwise highly sensitive materials to over 800 customers
nationwide.  The Company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia and
employ 369 people.

BeavEx Holding Corporation and four of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-10316) on
Feb. 18, 2019.  In the petitions signed by CRO Donald Van der Wiel,
BeavEx estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in estimated liabilities.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein oversees the cases.

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, serves as counsel to the
Debtors.  Donald Van der Wiel of S3 Advisors, LLC, is serving as
the Debtors' CRO.  Stretto acts as claims and noticing agent.


BEYDA ADULT: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee, until further notice, will not appoint an
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
The Beyda Adult Day Care Center, LLC, according to court dockets.
    
                About Beyda Adult Day Care Center

The Beyda Adult Day Care Center, LLC sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
19-14809) on April 12, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of less than
$1 million.  The case has been assigned to Judge Raymond B. Ray.
Van Horn Law Group, Inc. is the Debtor's legal counsel.


BREATHE RITE: Seeks to Hire Ruff & Cohen as Attorney
----------------------------------------------------
Breathe Rite Respiratory Services, Inc., seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to employ
Ruff & Cohen, P.A., as attorney to the Debtor.

Breathe Rite requires Ruff & Cohen to represent and provide legal
services to the Debtor in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Ruff & Cohen will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.  The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Lisa C. Cohen, a partner at Ruff & Cohen, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Ruff & Cohen can be reached at:

         Lisa C. Cohen, Esq.
         RUFF & COHEN, P.A.,
         4010 Newberry Road, Suite G
         Gainesville, FL 32607
         Tel: (352) 376-3601
         Fax: (352) 378-1261

             About Breathe Rite Respiratory Services

Breathe Rite Respiratory Services, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 19-03011) on May 5,
2019, disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
Lisa C. Cohen, Esq., at Ruff & Cohen, P.A., is counsel to the
Debtor.


CANADA: RCMP Faces Inuit Abuse Lawsuit Amid Class Action
--------------------------------------------------------
The Canadian Press reports that an Inuit family whose son was shot
by RCMP is suing the force over its alleged failure to staff Arctic
detachments with officers who can speak with and understand the
communities where they are posted.

It's the second recent lawsuit to question the relationship between
officers and Indigenous northerners. The longtime northern lawyer
who represents the family said she fears the RCMP is gradually
losing its connection to the people they are supposed to serve.

"We want to prevent another shooting death of a person in Nunavut,"
said David Qamaniq, the father of Kunuk Qamaniq, who died of a
gunshot wound after a confrontation with Mounties in Pond Inlet in
2017.

A statement of claim says the 20-year-old man was grieving the
one-year anniversary of his sister's suicide the afternoon he was
shot.

"Together with his mother he cried for his lost sister," the
statement says. "Kunuk expressed despair and suggested he, too,
might commit suicide."

His parents became concerned and contacted RCMP when they learned
their son had borrowed a rifle to go rabbit hunting and was headed
to the community graveyard. David Qamaniq told the officers his son
was sober.

Shortly after, the Qamaniqs were summoned to the community health
centre, where they learned their son had been shot by an officer.
The young man died shortly after.

The lawsuit is an attempt to force the RCMP to institute
recommendations from several inquests into suicides and police
shootings in Nunavut, said Qamaniq.

"RCMP, I don't think, have followed the recommendations," he said.

The lawsuit alleges Mounties aren't trained in how to deal with
possible suicides. It claims officers don't speak the language of
the people and don't use the communication tools they have.

It also refers to "the personal and cultural biases of the officers
. . . both unexpressed and which they had expressed in the
community."

It accuses the RCMP of failing to recruit Inuktut-speaking officers
or civilian members who could build bridges with local people.

A statement of defence has not been filed and none of the
allegations has been proven. The RCMP did not respond to a call for
comment.

V-Division, which polices Nunavut, boasts fewer and fewer Inuk
officers and has three of about 120 in total. The RCMP website says
none of its 25 detachments offers services in Inuktut.

V-Division spokesmen have said they try to prepare southern
officers for policing remote Inuit communities. There is a firearm
occurrence somewhere in the territory every day and a half.

Rethinking the Mountie mandate: RCMP needs to quit municipal,
provincial policing, critics say in wake of new report
"They orient them a little bit — a little bit," Qamaniq said.
"Just the tip of an iceberg. That's not enough."

Anne Crawford, the family's lawyer, said the force is losing touch
with Inuit.

"Everyone is concerned about the overall relationship between the
RCMP and individuals in Nunavut these days," she said.

"I have practised here for a very long time. It seems to be more
and more difficult for RCMP officers to get a really good feel for
the communities they're working in."

A class-action lawsuit filed in an Edmonton court in December
alleges RCMP in the three northern territories regularly assault
and abuse Indigenous people.

The Nunavut legislature has also discussed the problem. In 2015, a
report was commissioned into police misconduct. The report was
never released.

A letter that year from Nunavut's legal-aid service suggested it
had information on 30 cases of excessive use of force. The
service's chairwoman has said there were 27 civil cases filed
between 2014 and 2017. [GN]



CARUGATI CONSTRUCTION: June 24 Plan Confirmation Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------
The disclosure statement explaining the Chapter 11 Plan filed by
Carugati Construction, LLC, as it is to be amended, is
conditionally approved.

June 24, 2019 at 11:00 a.m. is fixed for the hearing on final
approval of the disclosure statement and for the hearing on
confirmation of the plan.

June 20, 2019 fixed as the last day for filing written acceptances
or rejections of the plan.

June 20, 2019 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement and confirmation of
the plan.

                About Carugati Construction

Carugati Construction, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34563) on July 28, 2017, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by Larry A. Vick, Esq., at the Law Offices of Larry A.
Vick.


CBAK ENERGY: Incurs $2.80 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 20, 2019, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q reporting a net loss of $2.80 million on $5.17 million of net
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to a
net loss of $2.56 million on $3.31 million of net revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, CBAK Energy had $123.24 million in total
assets, $120.28 million in total liabilities, and $2.95 million in
total equity.

The Company has financed its liquidity requirements from short-term
bank loans, other short-term loans and bills payable under bank
credit agreements, advances from its related and unrelated parties,
investors and issuance of capital stock.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$0.2 million.  Its total current assets were $51.1 million and its
total current liabilities were $85.9 million, resulting in a net
working capital deficiency of $34.8 million.  These factors raise
substantial doubts about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

CBAK Energy said, "We are currently expanding our product lines and
manufacturing capacity in our Dalian plant, which require more
funding to finance the expansion.  We may also require additional
cash due to changing business conditions or other future
developments, including any investments or acquisitions we may
decide to pursue.  We plan to renew these loans upon maturity, if
required, and plan to raise additional funds through bank
borrowings and equity financing in the future to meet our daily
cash demands, if required.  However, there can be no assurance that
we will be successful in obtaining this financing. If our existing
cash and bank borrowing are insufficient to meet our requirements,
we may seek to sell equity securities, debt securities or borrow
from lending institutions.  We can make no assurance that financing
will be available in the amounts we need or on terms acceptable to
us, if at all.  The sale of equity securities, including
convertible debt securities, would dilute the interests of our
current shareholders.  The incurrence of debt would divert cash for
working capital and capital expenditures to service debt
obligations and could result in operating and financial covenants
that restrict our operations and our ability to pay dividends to
our shareholders.  If we are unable to obtain additional equity or
debt financing as required, our business operations and prospects
may suffer."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/ajrBOU

                        About CBAK Energy

Dalian, China-based CBAK Energy Technology, Inc., formerly China
BAK Battery, Inc. -- http://www.cbak.com.cn-- is engaged in the
business of developing, manufacturing and selling new energy high
power lithium batteries, which are mainly used in the following
applications: electric vehicles; light electric vehicles; and
electric tools, energy storage, uninterruptible power supply, and
other high power applications.

CBAK Energy reported a net loss of $1.95 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared with a net loss of $21.46 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, the Company had
$127.6 million in total assets, $127.3 million in total
liabilities, and $327,299 in total equity.

Centurion ZD CPA & Co., in Hong Kong, China, the Company's auditor
since 2016, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the
Company has a working capital deficiency, accumulated deficit from
recurring net losses and significant short-term debt obligations
maturing in less than one year as of Dec. 31, 2018. All these
factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


CECIWONG INC: Court Confirms Chapter 11 Plan
--------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court has confirmed CeCiWong, Inc.'s Combined
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

Class 2: Disputed Unsecured Claims are impaired. No payment until
Claim is Allowed, net of all counter-claims. Payment in cash of 20%
of the amount of the Claim or such other amount as the Court
determines necessary to ensure that it exceeds what might be
recovered in a liquidation under Chapter 7. Cash reserve to be set
in an amount approved by the Court at the Confirmation Hearing or
prior to the Effective Date. To date, no Proofs of Claim have been
filed which are assigned to Class 2. The Claims assigned to Class 2
are: (a) any Claims hereafter filed by Prior Management (including,
without limitation Cecilia Wong, Chloe Lee and Donna Chan); and (b)
such other claims that are filed after the date of this Debtor’s
Plan and prior to the Claims Bar Date unless the Debtor assigns the
claim to Class 1 in writing. To date, no claims are assigned to
Class 2.

Class 1: Approved Creditors are impaired. Payment in full on the
10th day after the Effective Date, without interest.

Class 3: Trust's Claims are impaired. Subject to payment of all
other claims as provided under the Debtor's Plan (or reservation of
funds for such payment if disputed claims are ultimately Allowed)
the Trust shall receive all of the Debtor’s remaining assets in
kind, free and clear of claims and liens.

Class 4: Ownership Interests are impaired. All ownership interests
in the Debtor shall be extinguished by confirmation of the
Debtor’s Plan.

The Trust will loan funds to the Debtor to enable it to fund all
Plan expenses.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated May 9, 2019, is
available at https://tinyurl.com/y2z85bvu from PacerMonitor.com at
no charge.

Special Counsel for the Debtor is Michael St. James, Esq., in San
Francisco, California.

                   About CeciWong Inc.

CeCiWong, Inc. -- http://www.worldofceciwong.com/-- is in the  
jewelry, precious stones and precious metals business.  CeCiWong
sought relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Cal. Case No. 18-31385) on Dec. 21, 2018.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor disclosed $3,137,729 in assets and $5,674,492
in
liabilities.  The case has been assigned to Judge Hannah L.
Blumenstiel.  Michael Jones & Associates, PC is the Debtor's
counsel.


CLOUD PEAK: Taps Prime Clerk as Claims Agent
--------------------------------------------
Cloud Peak Energy Inc. received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to employ Prime Clerk LLC as
claims and noticing agent.

The firm will oversee the distribution of notices and the
maintenance, processing and docketing of proofs of claim filed in
the Chapter 11 cases of the company and its affiliates.

Prime Clerk will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Director of Solicitation                  $210
     Solicitation Consultant                   $190
     COO and Executive VP                      No charge
     Director                                  $175 - $195
     Consultant/Senior Consultant              $65 - $170
     Technology Consultant                     $35 - $95
     Analyst                                   $35 - $50

The Debtors paid Prime Clerk an advance fee of $50,000 and will
reimburse the firm for work-related expenses.

Benjamin Steele, vice president of Prime Clerk, assured the court
that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Prime Clerk can be reached at:

     Benjamin J. Steele
     Prime Clerk LLC
     830 3rd Avenue, 9th Floor
     New York, NY10022
     Tel: (212) 257-5450
     E-mail: bsteele@primeclerk.com

                    About Cloud Peak Energy

Cloud Peak Energy Inc. -- http://www.cloudpeakenergy.com/-- is a
coal producer headquartered in Gillette, Wyo.  It mines low sulfur,
subbituminous coal and provides logistics supply services.  Cloud
Peak owns and operates three surface coal mines and owns rights to
undeveloped coal and complementary surface assets in the Powder
River Basin.  It is a sustainable fuel supplier for approximately
two percent of the nation's electricity.

Cloud Peak Energy and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
19-11047) on May 10, 2019.  The Debtors disclosed $928,656,000 in
assets and $634,982,000 in liabilities.  

The cases have been assigned to Judge Kevin Gross.

The Debtors tapped Vinson & Elkins LLP as lead counsel; Richards,
Layton & Finger, P.A. as local counsel; Centerview Partners LLC as
investment banker; FTI Consulting Inc. as operational advisor; and
Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.


COVERT CANYON: Proposed Sale of Alpine Property Approved
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christopher B. Latham of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of California authorized Covert Canyon, LLC's
sale of the real property located at 19150 High Glen Rd, Alpine,
California to Brian Massie, Glenn Dellimore and Tony Schiena.

The Purchase Price will be payable as follows:

     a. $100,000 as earnest money, which Earnest Money will be
deposited by the Buyer with First American Title Insurance Co.,
with offices at 4380 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 200, San Diego,
CA 92122 within three business days after the Effective Date, and
which Earnest Money will be held, invested and disbursed by Escrow
Agent in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

     b. Funds sufficient to constitute payment in full to satisfy
Deed of Trust No. 1 (estimated to be $1,089,779 as of April 2,
2019) and Deed of Trust No. 2 (estimated to be $796,886 as of April
2, 2019), which total amounts will be confirmed by the Escrow Agent
prior to disbursement, to the respective creditors, which will be
deposited by Buyer with the Escrow Agent by the Closing Date and
which will be held, invested and disbursed by Escrow Agent in
accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

     c. The Earnest Money, the Loan Payments, any additions
thereto, and any interest earned thereon is to be applied to the
Purchase Price. The Buyer will pay any applicable taxes associated
with any interest or dividends earned on the investment.

     d. The Purchase Price will be subject to pro-rations, credits
or adjustments as provided on the Closing Date.

The hearing on the Motion was held on May 10, 2019 at 2:00 p.m.

First American Title Co. as the designated escrow for the Sale of
the Real Property, is authorized to pay the payoff demands
submitted by the secured creditors Secured Creditors Covert Canyon
Training Center, LLC and Seacoast Commerce Bank, as well as the
escrow charges, title and recording fees and any property taxes
owed as set forth in the Sale Documents, and as expressly provided
and required under the terms of the Stipulation for Conditional
Consent to Sale of Real property, Granting Relief from Automatic
Stay, and Dismissal of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceeding between the
Debtor and the Secured Creditors approved by separate order of the
Court.

As long as Escrow closes and the Secured Creditors are paid prior
to dismissal of the case as provided under the Sale Stipulation,
the Office of the US Trustee will be paid the equivalent of their
quarterly fees allowed under 28 U.S.C. 1930(a)(6), whether through
Escrow or othenwise paid directly to the Office of the US Trustee.

                      About Covert Canyon

Covert Canyon is a privately held lessor of real estate in El
Cajon, Calif.  It is the fee simple owner of a real property
located at 19150 High Glen Road, Alpine, Calif., which is valued at
$2 million.

Covert Canyon filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case
No. 19-01934) on April 2, 2019. In the petition signed by Marc
Halcon, managing member, the Debtor estimated $2,001,875 in assets
and $1,966,666 in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Christopher B. Latham.  

Thomas B. Gorrill, Esq., at the Law Office of Thomas B. Gorrill, is
the Debtor's counsel.


CREATIVE GLOBAL: Committee Hires Lewis Brisbois as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Creative Global
Investment, Inc., seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to retain Lewis
Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, as bankruptcy counsel to the
Committee.

The Committee requires Lewis Brisbois to:

   a. advise the Committee concerning its rights, powers, and
      responsibilities under the Bankruptcy Code;

   b. provide aid and assistance in dealing with the Debtor in
      the administration of the bankruptcy case, advice in
      communicating with the Committee's constituents regarding
      significant matters in the case;

   c. assist and advise the Committee in any proposed sale of the
      Debtor's assets;

   d. provide representation in all negotiations and proceedings
      involving the Debtor, creditors, and other parties in
      interest in matters relating to the administration of the
      estate, terms of the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan of
      reorganization or liquidation, confirmation of the Chapter
      11 plan, and all other legal aspects of the Debtor's
      Chapter 11 case;

   e. assist the Committee's investigation of the acts, conduct,
      assets, liabilities and financial condition of the Debtor
      and of the operation of the Debtor's business and any other
      matters relevant to the bankruptcy case;

   f. assist the Committee in requesting the appointment of a
      trustee or examiner, or conversion or dismissal of the
      Chapter 11 case, should such actions be necessary;

   g. represent the Committee in all hearings and other
      proceedings;

   h. review and analyze all applications, orders, financial
      statements, and schedules of the Debtor and advise the
      Committee accordingly;

   i. assist the Committee in the preparation of agreements,
      motions, applications, responses, orders, complaints, and
      any other pleadings necessary to further the Committee's
      interests and objectives; and

   j. perform such other legal services as the Committee may
      require under the circumstances of the bankruptcy case to
      advance the Committee's interests in accordance with the
      powers and duties established under the Bankruptcy Code.

Lewis Brisbois will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys               $395 to $500
     Paraprofessionals           $150

Lewis Brisbois will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Lovee Sarenas, a partner at Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not
creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the Debtor; (b)
has not been, within two years before the date of the filing of the
Debtor's chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees of
the Debtor; and (c) does not have an interest materially adverse to
the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or equity
security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship
to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtor, or for any other
reason.

Lewis Brisbois can be reached at:

         Lovee Sarenas, Esq.
         Amy L. Goldman, Esq.
         Scott Lee, Esq.
         LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP
         633 West 5th Street, Suite 4000
         Los Angeles, CA 90071
         Tel: (213) 250-1800
         Fax: (213) 250-7900
         E-mail: Lovee.Sarenas@lewisbrisbois.com
                 Amy.Goldman@lewisbrisbois.com
                 Scott.Lee@lewisbrisbois.com

                About Creative Global Investment

Creative Global Investment Inc. is a privately held company engaged
in financial investment activities.

Creative Global Investment sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-13044) on March
20, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $36,691
in assets and $5,388,873 in liabilities.  

The case is assigned to Judge Sandra R. Klein.

Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP is the Debtor's legal
counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 15, 2019, appointed five
creditors to serve on an official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained Lewis Brisbois
Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, as bankruptcy counsel.


DPW HOLDINGS: Incurs $6.71 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
DPW Holdings, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 20, 2019, its quarterly report on Form 10-Q
reporting a net loss of $6.71 million on $6.93 million of total
revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2019, compared to a
net loss of $6.09 million on $5.19 million of total revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had $54.77 million in total
assets, $36.74 million in total liabilities, and $18.03 million in
total stockholders' equity.

As of March 31, 2019, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$1.284 million, an accumulated deficit of $62.72 million and a
negative working capital of $19.50 million.  The Company has
incurred recurring losses and reported losses for the three months
ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, totaled $6.711 million and $6.096
million, respectively.  In the past, the Company has financed its
operations principally through issuances of convertible debt,
promissory notes and equity securities.  During 2019, the Company
continued to successfully obtain additional equity and debt
financing and in restructuring existing debt.

The Company expects to continue to incur losses for the foreseeable
future and needs to raise additional capital to continue its
business development initiatives and to support its working capital
requirements.  In March 2017, the Company was awarded a 3-year, $50
million purchase order by MTIX Ltd. to manufacture, install and
service the Multiplex Laser Surface Enhancement plasma-laser
system.  Currently, the Company has subcontracted out a significant
amount of these services to third parties.  Although the
manufacture of the $50 million of MLSE plasma-laser systems is
expected to exceed four years, management continues to believe that
the MLSE purchase order will be a source of revenue and generate
significant cash flows for the Company.  Additionally, on April 2,
2019, the Company received gross proceeds of approximately $7
million in a public offering of its securities.  

"Management believes that the Company has access to capital
resources through potential public or private issuances of debt or
equity securities.  However, if the Company is unable to raise
additional capital, it may be required to curtail operations and
take additional measures to reduce costs, including reducing its
workforce, eliminating outside consultants and reducing legal fees
to conserve its cash in amounts sufficient to sustain operations
and meet its obligations.  These matters raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern," DPW
Holdings said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/d2TFbu

                       About DPW Holdings

DPW Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Digital Power Corp. --
http://www.DPWHoldings.com/-- is a diversified holding company
pursuing growth by acquiring undervalued businesses and disruptive
technologies that hold global potential.  Through its wholly owned
subsidiaries and strategic investments, the company provides
mission-critical products that support a diverse range of
industries, including defense/aerospace, industrial,
telecommunications, medical, crypto-mining, and textiles.  In
addition, the company owns a select portfolio of commercial
hospitality properties and extends credit to select entrepreneurial
businesses through a licensed lending subsidiary.  DPW Holdings'
headquarters is located at 201 Shipyard Way, Suite E, Newport
Beach, CA 92663.

DPW Holdings incurred a net loss of $32.98 million in 2018,
following a net loss of $10.89 million in 2017.  As of Dec. 31,
2018, the Company had $49.42 million in total assets, $31.36
million in total liabilities, and $18.06 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2016, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated April 16, 2019,
on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has a significant
working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and
needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain
its operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DPW HOLDINGS: Raises $500,000 from Selling Notes with Warrants
--------------------------------------------------------------
DPW Holdings, Inc., entered into a securities purchase agreement on
May 20, 2019, with an institutional investor to sell, for a
purchase price of $500,000, a 4% Original Issue Discount
Convertible Promissory Note with an aggregate principal face amount
of $660,000, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares,
subject to adjustment of the Company's common stock, par value
$0.001 per share.  The principal of the Note and interest earned
thereon may be converted into shares of Common Stock.  The Note is
convertible into Conversion Shares at $0.22 per share, subject to
adjustment.  The exercise price of the Warrant is $0.20 per share,
subject to adjustment.  The issuance of the Shares is subject to
approval by the NYSE American.  In addition, the chief executive
officer of the Company agreed to guarantee and act as surety for
the Company's obligation to repay the Note pursuant to a Personal
Guarantee.

The Note is in the aggregate principal amount of $660,000 and was
sold for $500,000.  The Note bears simple interest at 4% on the
principal amount, and principal and interest are due on Aug. 10,
2019.  Subject to certain beneficial ownership limitations, the
Investor may convert the principal amount of the Note and accrued
interest earned thereon at any time into Conversion Shares at $0.22
per share.  The conversion price of the Note is subject to
adjustment for customary stock splits, stock dividends,
combinations or similar events.

The Note contains standard and customary events of default
including, but not limited to, failure to make payments when due
under the Note, failure to comply with certain covenants contained
in the Note, or bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company.  Any
principal or interest on the Note which is not paid when due will
bear interest at the rate of the lesser of (i) fifteen percent per
annum and (ii) the maximum amount permitted by law from the due
date thereof until the same is paid.

At the option of the Company with not less than 10 days prior
written notice to the Investor, the Company may prepay the
outstanding Note (principal and accrued interest), in full, in
accordance with the terms thereof.  If the Company exercises its
right to prepay the Note, the Company shall make payment to the
Investor of an amount in cash equal to the Multiple (as hereinafter
defined), multiplied by the sum of: (a) the then outstanding
principal of the Note, plus (b) accrued and unpaid interest on the
unpaid principal of the Note to the date fixed for prepayment, plus
(c) if applicable, Default Interest, if any, on the amounts
referred to in clauses (a) and (b), plus (d) any amounts owed to
the Investor pursuant to the Note.  For purposes hereof, "Multiple"
means: (i) 105% if the Notice is delivered within one year of the
issuance of the Note; (ii) 110% if the Notice is delivered between
one (1) year and the second anniversary of the issuance of the
Note; (iii) 115% if the Notice is delivered between two years and
the third anniversary of the issuance of the Note; and (iv) 120% if
the Notice is delivered at any time thereafter.

The Warrant entitles the Investor to purchase, in the aggregate, up
to 500,000 Warrant Shares at an exercise price of $0.20 per share
for a period of five years subject to certain beneficial ownership
limitations.  The Warrant is immediately exercisable. The exercise
price of $0.20 is subject to adjustment for customary stock splits,
stock dividends, combinations or similar events.  The Warrant may
be exercised for cash or on a cashless basis.

                     About DPW Holdings

DPW Holdings, Inc., formerly known as Digital Power Corp. --
http://www.DPWHoldings.com/-- is a diversified holding company
pursuing growth by acquiring undervalued businesses and disruptive
technologies that hold global potential.  Through its wholly owned
subsidiaries and strategic investments, the company provides
mission-critical products that support a diverse range of
industries, including defense/aerospace, industrial,
telecommunications, medical, crypto-mining, and textiles.  In
addition, the company owns a select portfolio of commercial
hospitality properties and extends credit to select entrepreneurial
businesses through a licensed lending subsidiary. DPW Holdings'
headquarters is located at 201 Shipyard Way, Suite E, Newport
Beach, CA 92663.

DPW Holdings incurred a net loss of $32.98 million in 2018,
following a net loss of $10.89 million in 2017.  As of March 31,
2019, the Company had $54.77 million in total assets, $36.74
million in total liabilities, and $18.03 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2016, issued a
"going concern" qualification in its report dated April 16, 2019,
on the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the Company has a significant
working capital deficiency, has incurred significant losses and
needs to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain
its operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DURHAM CONSTRUCTION: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 17 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Durham Contruction Trade
Institute.

             About Durham Contruction Trade Institute

Durham Contruction Trade Institute sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-11815) on
March 29, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of less than
$500,000.  The case has been assigned to Judge Jessica E. Price
Smith.  Donald Butler & Associates is the Debtor's legal counsel.


EAGLE REBAR: Hires Yarborough Law Firm as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Eagle Rebar and Cable Co., Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Mississippi to employ
Yarborough Law Firm as special counsel to the Debtor.

Eagle Rebar requires Yarborough Law Firm to investigate, prosecute,
collect, compromise, the Debtor's claim for personal injuries,
medical expenses, loss of wages, concerning the matter initiated by
the Mississippi Transportation Commission in Cause No.
D2401-12-19.

Yarborough Law Firm will be paid a commission of 30% of whatever
money, or real, or personal or mixed property of any description
whatever collected in excess of the amount of $89,150.

Yarborough Law Firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Gary Yarborough, Jr., a partner at Yarborough Law Firm, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Yarborough Law Firm can be reached at:

     Gary Yarborough, Jr., Esq.
     YARBOROUGH LAW FIRM
     845-B Highway 90
     Bay St., Louis, MS 39520
     Tel: (228) 467-5771

                  About Eagle Rebar and Cable Co.

Eagle Rebar and Cable Co., Inc., is a privately held steel erecting
company in Gulfport, Mississippi.  

Eagle Rebar and Cable filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case No. 18-50328) on Feb. 23, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Billy R. Moore, director/vice president, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Katharine M. Samson.
Craig M. Geno, Esq., at Craig M. Geno, PPLC, is the Debtor's
counsel.  Yarborough Law Firm, is special counsel.


EDGEMARC ENERGY: Advised by Davis Polk on Restructuring
-------------------------------------------------------
Davis Polk is advising EdgeMarc Energy Holdings, LLC and its eight
subsidiaries in connection with their restructuring under chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.  EdgeMarc intends to use
the restructuring process to pursue the sale of all or
substantially all of its assets pursuant to section 363 of the
Bankruptcy Code in order to maximize value for the benefit of its
stakeholders.

On May 15, 2019, EdgeMarc filed voluntary chapter 11 petitions in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.
At an uncontested hearing on May 16, 2019, Judge Brendan L. Shannon
approved EdgeMarc's debtor-in-possession financing on an interim
basis and granted EdgeMarc all of its requested relief.

In connection with the chapter 11 filings, EdgeMarc entered into a
$108 million debtor-in-possession credit facility with KeyBank
National Association, the agent and sole lender under EdgeMarc's
prepetition reserve based lending facility.  The
debtor-in-possession credit agreement is comprised of a $30 million
new money term loan facility and a $77.8 million roll-up of
EdgeMarc's prepetition secured debt into junior
debtor-in-possession loans, which will be subject and subordinate
to the debtor-in-possession term loans.  Upon the entry of the
interim order by the Bankruptcy Court, an initial $15 million draw
of the new money term loan facility will be available to EdgeMarc
and an additional $15 million draw and all of the roll-up facility
will become available only after the Bankruptcy Court enters a
final debtor-in-possession order.  The proceeds of the
debtor-in-possession credit facility will be used to support
EdgeMarc's business during the reorganization, pay administrative
expenses of the Chapter 11 cases and make adequate protection
payments to KeyBank.

Based in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, EdgeMarc is a privately-held
limited liability company engaged in the acquisition, production,
exploration and development of natural gas and natural gas liquids
from underground deposits in the Appalachian Basin.  EdgeMarc
conducts its drilling and exploration activities in the "stacked"
liquids-rich Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania and dry gas Utica
shale in Ohio.  EdgeMarc controls contiguous positions of
approximately 45,000 net acres across Ohio and Pennsylvania.

The Davis Polk restructuring team includes partner Darren S. Klein
and associates Aryeh Ethan Falk, Jonah A. Peppiatt, Mary A. Prager
and Zachary Levine.  The litigation team includes partner Lara
Samet Buchwald and associate R. Brendan Mooney.  The finance team
includes partner Meyer C. Dworkin and associate Sanders Witkow. The
mergers and acquisitions team includes partner Brian Wolfe. All
members of the Davis Polk team are based in the New York office.  

Evercore Group L.L.C. is serving as EdgeMarc's investment banker
and Opportune LLP is serving as its restructuring adviser.  Landis
Rath & Cobb LLP is serving as EdgeMarc's Delaware counsel.

                       About EdgeMarc

Headquartered in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, EdgeMarc Energy
Holdings, LLC -- http://www.edgemarcenergy.com/-- is a locally
based natural gas exploration and production company headquartered
in Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.  It is engaged in the acquisition,
production, exploration and development of natural gas and natural
gas liquids from underground deposits in the Appalachian Basin.
EdgeMarc Energy conducts its drilling and exploration activities in
the "stacked" liquid-rich Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania and dry
gas Utica shale in Ohio.

EdgeMarc Energy and its 8 affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 19-11104) on May 15, 2019.

EdgeMarc Energy estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million
and liabilities of the same range as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped LANDIS RATH & COBB LLP as counsel; DAVIS POLK &
WARDWELL LLP as corporate counsel; EVERCORE PARTNERS as investment
banker; OPPORTUNE LLC AND DACARBA LLC as financial advisor; and
PRIME CLERK LLC as claims agent.


ENVESTR CAPITAL: Hires Koenig Rubloff as Real Estate Broker
-----------------------------------------------------------
Envestr Capital, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois to employ Koenig
Rubloff Realty Group, as real estate broker to the Debtor.

Envestr Capital requires Koenig Rubloff to market and sell the
Debtor's real proper known as 2 Erin Lane, Burr Ridge, Illinois.

Koenig Rubloff will be paid a commission of 6% of the sales price.

Jorie Peirce, broker of Koenig Rubloff Realty Group, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Koenig Rubloff can be reached at:

     Jorie Peirce
     KOENIG RUBLOFF REALTY GROUP
     980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 900
     Chicago, IL 60611
     Tel: (312) 368-5300

                     About Envestr Capital

Envestr Capital, LLC, based in Cicero, IL, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 19-05517) on March 1, 2019.  In
the petition signed by Gus Dahleh, manager, the Debtor disclosed
$975,000 in assets and $14,147,000 in liabilities.  The Hon.
Benjamin A. Goldgar oversees the case.  David P. Lloyd, Esq., at
David P. Lloyd, Ltd., serves as bankruptcy counsel.





EVEN STEVENS: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
---------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 17 appointed three creditors
to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 cases of Even Stevens Arizona LLC and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     (1) Mark Shurtliff
         President
         Strategic Technology, Inc.
         1103 South Orem Blvd.
         Orem, Utah 84907
         Telephone: (801) 762-6625
         Email: mark@strategic-ts.com

     (2) Rick Dutson
         President
         Dutson Builders, Inc.
         472 Bearcat Drive
         Salt Lake City, Utah 84115
         Telephone: (801) 870-8613
         Email: rdutson@dutsonbuilders.com

     (3) Jill B. Hamblen
         Member
         Tri Arc Architecture & Design
         1934 E. Camelback Rd., Suite 200
         Phoenix, Arizona 85016
         Telephone: (602) 229-1100
         Email: Jill@triarcdesign.com

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                   About Even Stevens Arizona

Even Stevens -- https://evenstevens.com/ -- is a craft-casual
restaurant chain that specializes in sandwiches and salads.

Even Stevens Arizona LLC and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Lead Case No.
19-03235) on March 21, 2019.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated assets and
liabilities as follows:

                            Estimated Assets        Estimated Debt
                            ----------------        --------------
Even Stevens Arizona           $0 to $50,000  $10-mil. to $50-mil.
Even Stevens Sandwiches  $1-mil. to $10-mil.   $1-mil. to $10-mil.
Even Stevens Utah              $0 to $50,000   $1-mil. to $10-mil.
Even Stevens Idaho             $0 to $50,000   $500,000 to $1-mil.

The cases are assigned to Judge Daniel P. Collins.  

Davis Miles McGuire Gardner, PLLC is the Debtors' legal counsel.


FIDI DISTRICT: Seeks to Hire Wotman Law as Attorney
---------------------------------------------------
Fidi District LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
employ Wotman Law PLLC as attorney to the Debtors.

Fidi District requires Wotman Law to:

   a. analyze the Debtors' financial situation and rendering
      advice in determining whether to file a petition in
      bankruptcy;

   b. prepare and file of any petition, schedules, statement of
      financial affairs and plan which may be required;

   c. represent the Debtors at the meeting of creditors and
      confirmation hearing, and any adjourned hearings thereof;

   d. give advice to the Debtors with respect to its powers and
      duties as debtors in possession in the continued management
      and operation of their business and properties;

   e. negotiate with creditors of the Debtors and other parties
      in interest in working out a plan or plans of
      reorganization, and to take necessary legal steps in order
      to confirm such plans, including, if need be, negotiations
      for financing such plans;

   f. prepare on behalf of the Debtors, as debtors in possession,
      necessary applications, motions, complaints, answers,
      orders, reports and other pleadings and documents;

   g. appear before the Court and the U.S. Trustee and to protect
      the interests of the Debtors before the Court and the
      U.S. Trustee;

   h. represent the Debtors in adversary proceedings and other
      contested matters; and

   i. perform legal services for the Debtors as debtor in
      possession, which may be necessary and appropriate herein.

Wotman Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

           Attorneys       $400
           Associates      $250
           Paralegals      $150

On Dec. 19, 2018, Wotman Law received a retainer of $50,000, and
$5,151 for the Chapter 11 Filing Fee for the three Debtors Fidi
District LLC, Columbus Village LLC and NGM Management Group LLC.

On March 17, 2019, Wotman Law received a retainer of $25,000, and
$3,434 for the Chapter 11 Filing Fee for the two Debtors Fuber LLC
and Midtown East NY LLC.

Wotman Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Daniel R. Wotman, a partner at Wotman Law, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and their estates.

Wotman Law can be reached at:

     Daniel R. Wotman, Esq.
     WOTMAN LAW PLLC
     200 Park Avenue, Suite 1700
     New York NY 10166
     Tel: (646) 774-2900
     E-mail: dwotman@wotmanlaw.com

                        About Fidi District

Fuber LLC and Midtown East NY LLC are restaurant companies doing
business as Bareburger, offering American cuisine.  The restaurant
also provides vegetarian, vegan, and gluten free food options.

Fuber LLC and Midtown East NY LLC sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 19-10790) on March 17, 2019.  In the
petitions signed by Michael Pitsinos, managing member, the Debtors
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
$100,000 to $500,000.  The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman oversees the
cases.  Daniel R. Wotman, Esq., at Wotman Law PLLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.


FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION: S&P Affirms 'B+' Debt Ratings on Add-On
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' issue-level rating on New
York-based Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors
LLC's (FTAI) senior unsecured notes due in 2025 following its
announcement of a $150 million add-on, bringing the notes' total
principal outstanding to $450 million.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B+' issue-level rating on
FTAI's senior unsecured notes due in 2022. S&P's recovery rating on
FTAI's senior unsecured notes due in 2022 and in 2025 remains '2',
indicating its expectation that lenders would receive substantial
(70%-90%; rounded estimate: 70%) recovery of principal in the event
of a payment default. The rounded estimate of 70% is lower than the
rating agency's previous estimate of 80% due to the additional $150
million of debt.

The add-on carries the same terms as the existing notes, which have
an interest rate of 6.5% and mature Oct. 1, 2025. The company will
use the proceeds for general corporate purposes, including funding
future investments.

S&P's ratings on FTAI reflect the company's niche position in its
businesses. In its aircraft and aircraft engine leasing business,
the company is a relatively small participant, focusing on mid-life
assets. S&P's assessment of FTAI's infrastructure segment is based
on the company's small scale and lack of asset diversity with a
focus on energy terminals.

ISSUE RATINGS - RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

-- S&P has completed its review of the recovery analysis on FTAI's
senior unsecured debt. Its recovery rating remains '2', with a 70%
rounded estimate.

-- S&P values the company on a discrete asset value basis as a
going concern, and its valuations reflect the value of the various
assets at default based on recent market appraisals, adjusted for
expected realization rates in a distressed scenario.

-- S&P estimates that, for the company to default, a material
deterioration of its business would be required, caused by a
downturn in the global economy that leads to depressed commodity
prices and a loss of aviation customers.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Simulated year of default: 2022

Simplified waterfall

-- Gross recovery value: $1,549 million
-- Net recovery value for waterfall after administrative expenses
(5%): $1,472 million
-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 100%/0%
-- Value available for secured claims: $1,472 million
-- Estimated secured claims: $413 million
-- Value available for unsecured claims: $1,059 million
-- Estimated senior unsecured debt claims: $218 million
-- Total value available to junior unsecured claims: $841 million
-- Estimated junior unsecured debt claims: $1,181 million
-- Recovery expectations: 70%-90% (rounded estimate: 70%)

All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.
Collateral value equals asset pledge from obligors after priority
claims plus equity pledge from nonobligors after nonobligor debt.

  Ratings List

  Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
  
  Issuer Credit Rating B/Stable

  Rating Affirmed; Recovery Expectations Revised  
                        To  From
  Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC

  Senior Unsecured B+  B+
  Recovery Rating  2(70%) 2(80%)


FRESHSTART HOME: Seeks to Hire AREA Appraisal as Appraiser
----------------------------------------------------------
Freshstart Home Solutions, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to employ
AREA Appraisal Management Company, Inc., as appraiser to the
Debtor.

Freshstart Home requires AREA Appraisal to evaluate each of the 8
estate properties of the Debtor to be listed for sale.

AREA Appraisal will be paid $400 for each property appraised. The
firm received a retainer of $3,200 from the Debtor.

William Willson, CEO of AREA Appraisal Management Company, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

AREA Appraisal can be reached at:

         William Willson
         AREA APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.
         12479 Glory Dr.
         Mira Loma, CA 91752
         Tel: (949) 228-2743
         E-mail: bwillson@advancerea.net

                About Freshstart Home Solutions

Freshstart Home Solutions, LLC, is a real estate company that owns
in fee simple eight singe-family homes in various parts of
California having an aggregate current value of $12.2 million.

Freshstart Home Solutions, based in Sherman Oaks, CA, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 19-10954) on April
18, 2019.  In its petition, the Debtor disclosed $14,418,487 in
assets and $13,078,091 in liabilities.  The Hon. Martin R. Barash
oversees the case.  Michael R. Totaro, Esq., at Totaro & Shanahan,
serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


GARY STANIS: $659K Sale of Two Gibsonton Properties Approved
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Catherine Peek McEwen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida authorized Gary Edward Stanis' sale of
partial interest in real property located at (i) 9234 and 9236 Old
Gibsonton Drive, Gibsonton, Florida, and (ii) 9248 Gibsonton Drive,
Gibsonton, Florida, to Mark McAvoy and/or Mark McAvoy Florida
Properties, LLC, or their assigns, for $659,361.

The McAvoy Objection and Patricia Stanis Objection are sustained in
part and overruled in part.

The sale is free and clear of any and all liens, claims, and
encumbrances.

Within 10 days from the entry of the instant order, the Purchasers
will deposit the sum of $100,000 in the trust account of Banker
Lopez Gassler P.A.  Counsel for the Purchasers will file a notice
with the Court within two business days of receipt of the Purchase
Deposit.   

The closing on the Sale of the Subject Property will occur no later
than the first business day following 30 days after entry of the
Order Confirming a Plan of Reorganization in the instant bankruptcy
case.

In the event that the Purchasers fail to consummate the transaction
by paying the balance of the Purchase Price on or before the
Closing Date for any reason other than a default by the Debtor, and
upon the filing by the Debtor of a notice of default, the
Purchasers failing to close on the Sale through seven days after
the Debtor files a notice of default with respect to the
Purchasers,  the Purchasers will forfeit the Purchase Deposit and
the Purchase Deposit will be transferred to the trust account for
Buddy D. Ford, P.A., unless ordered otherwise by the Court.  In
such event, the Debtor will be entitled to keep the Purchase
Deposit as liquidated damages.

In the event that the Debtor fails to confirm a plan of
reorganization in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case, the Purchasers,
at their sole discretion, may elect to cancel the Sale of the
Subject Property and the Purchase Deposit will be returned to the
Purchaser.   

The Purchaser will be responsible for all presently outstanding ad
valorem taxes on the Subject Property and will receive no proration
for the 2019 ad valorem taxes.  

Upon entry of a Confirmation Order and the Debtors consummating the
Sale, the Purchasers and Robert J. Olita will voluntarily waive any
claims which they may have against the Debtor or his estate.

The Debtor is authorized to pay all broker's fees (3% of the
Purchase Price), liens, and all ordinary and necessary closing
expenses normally attributed to a seller of real estate at closing.
  

The Sale is on an "as is, where is" basis without any
representations or warranties by the Debtor and the Debtor is not
required to pay for any expenses related to title insurance.

Upon consummation of the Sale, the Debtor will deposit all
remaining proceeds from the Sale into a new DIP bank account,
opened solely for that purpose.  The DIP bank account must require
the signatures of both the Debtor and his counsel, Buddy D. Ford,
in order to release Sale Proceeds.  No Sale Proceeds may be
disbursed except pursuant to the Confirmation Order or other order
of the Court.

The liens of any secured creditors, explicitly including the liens
of Patricia Stanis and American Express National Bank, will attach
to the Sale Proceeds.

The Debtor must provide a copy of the closing statement on the Sale
of the Subject Property to the office of the United States Trustee
within 14 days from the Closing Date.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and
6006(d), the Order will be effective and enforceable immediately
upon entry and its provisions will be self-executing and the 14-day
stay required under Bankruptcy Rule Section6004(h) will be waived.


On July 6, 2018, Gary Edward Stanis filed a petition for protection
under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.  The case was converted to
a Chapter 11 case on Sept. 13, 2018 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
8:18-bk-05629-CPM).


GLOBAL HEALTHCARE: Delays Filing of March 31 Form 10-Q
------------------------------------------------------
Global Healthcare REIT, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission a 12b-25 notifying the delay in the filing of
its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2019.  The Company was unable to file its quarterly report on Form
10-Q within the prescribed time period because the Company has not
completed the preparation of its unaudited financial statements for
the fiscal quarter.

                    About Global Healthcare

Greenwood Village, Colorado-based Global Healthcare REIT, Inc.,
acquires, develops, leases, manages and disposes of healthcare real
estate, and provides financing to healthcare providers.  The
Company's portfolio will be comprised of investments in the
following five healthcare segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) life
science, (iii) medical office, (iv) post-acute/skilled nursing and
(v) hospital.

Global Healthcare reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $2.02 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $3.02
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, the
Company had $38.29 million in total assets, $37.31 million in total
liabilities, and $984,594 in total equity.

The audit opinion included in the Company's Annual Report for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, contains an explanatory paragraph
expressing substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas,
the Company's auditor since 2016, stated that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


GLOBAL HEALTHCARE: Posts $156,796 Net Income in First Quarter
-------------------------------------------------------------
Global Healthcare REIT, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 20, 2019, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q reporting net income attributable to common stockholders of
$156,796 on $1.27 million of total revenue for the three months
ended March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $21,833 on $812,065 of total revenue for the three
months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, Global Healthcare had $38.48 million in total
assets, $37.30 million in total liabilities, and $1.18 million in
total equity.

Throughout its history, the Company has experienced shortages in
working capital and has relied, from time to time, upon sales of
debt and equity securities to meet cash demands generated by its
acquisition activities.

Global Healthcare said, "Our liquidity is expected to increase from
potential equity and debt offerings and decrease as net offering
proceeds are expended in connection with our various property
improvement projects.  Our continuing short-term liquidity
requirements consisting primarily of operating expenses and debt
service requirements, excluding balloon payments at maturity, are
expected to be achieved from rental revenues received and existing
cash on hand.  We plan to renew secured obligations that mature
during 2019, as our projected cash flow from operations will be
insufficient to retire the debt.  Our restricted cash approximated
$228,515 as of March 31, 2019 and is to be expended on debt
service, taxes, repairs, and capital expenditures associated with
Providence of Sparta Nursing Home."

Cash provided by operating activities was $266,139 for the three
months ended March 31, 2019 compared to cash provided by operating
activities of $208,320 for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
Cash flows from operations were impacted by the decrease in
expenses and accounts receivable, and the increase in rental
revenues received and accounts payable during the first three
months of 2019.

Cash used in investing activities was $954,879 for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2019 compared to cash used in investing
activities of $178,021 for the three month period ended March 31,
2018.  The increase reflects increased spending on property
renovations and refurbishments.

Cash used financing activities was $3,828 for the three months
ended March 31, 2019 compared to cash used in financing activities
of $87,086 for the three months ended March 31, 2018. During the
first three months of 2019, the Company issued $159,875 in debt and
made payments on debt of $147,318.  During the first three months
of 2018, the Company issued $52,862 in debt in cash and made cash
payments on debt of $132,448.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/ib2vu3

                     About Global Healthcare

Greenwood Village, Colorado-based Global Healthcare REIT, Inc.,
acquires, develops, leases, manages and disposes of healthcare real
estate, and provides financing to healthcare providers.  The
Company's portfolio will be comprised of investments in the
following five healthcare segments: (i) senior housing, (ii) life
science, (iii) medical office, (iv) post-acute/skilled nursing and
(v) hospital.

Global Healthcare reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $2.02 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $3.02
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, the
Company had $38.29 million in total assets, $37.31 million in total
liabilities, and $984,594 in total equity.

The audit opinion included in the Company's Annual Report for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2018, contains an explanatory paragraph
expressing substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas,
the Company's auditor since 2016, stated that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


GRAMERCY GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Gramercy Group, Inc.
        3000 Burns Avenue
        Wantagh, NY 11793

Business Description: Gramercy Group, Inc. began operations in
                      1989, offering turnkey solutions in
                      environmental remediation and demolition.
                      Gramercy has expanded to provide more
                      services, including heavy civil and general
                      contracting services.  The company is
                      headquartered in Wantagh, New York.  

                      On the web: http://gramercyusa.com/

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 17, 2019

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Central Islip)

Case No.: 19-73622

Judge: Hon. Louis A. Scarcella

Debtor's Counsel: Elizabeth M. Aboulafia, Esq.
                  CULLEN & DYKMAN LLP
                  100 Quentin Roosevelt Blvd
                  Garden City, NY 11530
                  Tel: 516-357-3700
                  Fax: 516-357-3792
                  Email: eaboulafia@cullenanddykman.com

                    - and -

                  Melanie L. Cyganowski, Esq.
                  OTTERBOURG, STEINDLER, HOUSTON & ROSEN
                  230 Park Avenue
                  New York, NY 10169-0075
                  Tel: (212) 905-3677
                  Fax: (917) 368-7121
                  Email: mcyganowski@oshr.com
                         mcyganowski@otterbourg.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Vincent Parziale, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-73622_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb19-73622.pdf


GREGORY TE VELDE: Trustee's $100K Sale of Haywagon Denied
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Fredrick E. Clement of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of California denied without prejudice the sale by
Randy Sugarman, the Chapter 11 Trustee for Gregory John te Velde,
of the surplus vehicle described as a Model R840-S Shuitemaker
Haywagon to Douglas Van Surksum, for $100,000, subject to overbid,
free and clear of liens.

A hearing on the Motion was held on May 8, 2019 at 10:30 a.m.

Because the Motion has been denied the second amended notice of
hearing on the Motion will not be added to the Court's calendar.

                  About Gregory John te Velde

Tipton, California-based Gregory John te Velde filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11651) on April 26, 2018.

In his Chapter 11 petition, the Debtor estimated both assets and
liabilities between $100 million and $500 million.  Mr. te Velde
does business as GJ te Velde Dairy, Pacific Rim Dairy and Lost
Valley Farm.  He formerly did business as Willow Creek Dairy.

Judge Fredrick E. Clement oversees the bankruptcy case.

Mr. te Velde is represented by Riley C. Walter, Esq., who has an
office in Fresno, California.


GREGORY TE VELDE: Trustee's Sale of Two Classic Cars Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Fredrick E. Clement of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of California denied without prejudice the public
auction sale by Randy Sugarman, the Chapter 11 Trustee for Gregory
John te Velde, of the following classic cars: (1) a 1958 Cadillac
62 Sedan De Ville (VIN:  58L100659/License No. 4LZD452) and (2) a
1966 Lincoln Continental Convertible (VIN: 6Y86G429828 or as shown
on CA DMV 6Y86G2982/License No. 5JNL426).  

A hearing on the Motion was held on May 8, 2019 at 10:30 a.m.

Because the Motion has been denied the second amended notice of
hearing on the Motion will not be added to the Court's calendar.

                  About Gregory John te Velde

Tipton, California-based Gregory John te Velde filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11651) on April 26, 2018.

In his Chapter 11 petition, the Debtor estimated both assets and
liabilities between $100 million and $500 million.  Mr. te Velde
does business as GJ te Velde Dairy, Pacific Rim Dairy and Lost
Valley Farm.  He formerly did business as Willow Creek Dairy.

Judge Fredrick E. Clement oversees the bankruptcy case.

Mr. te Velde is represented by Riley C. Walter, Esq., who has an
office in Fresno, California.


GROM SOCIAL: Reports $2.28 Million Net Loss in First Quarter
------------------------------------------------------------
Grom Social Enterprises, Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on May 20, 2019, its quarterly report on Form
10-Q reporting a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$2.28 million on $1.96 million of sales for the three months ended
March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $1.09 million on $2.03 million of sales for the
three months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, Grom Social had $19.60 million in total
assets, $13.06 million in total liabilities, and $6.54 million in
total stockholders' equity.

At March 31, 2019, the Company had $762,500 in cash on hand
compared to $633,593 in cash on hand as of Dec. 31, 2018.

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, net cash used in
operating activities was $550,770 compared to net cash of $500,763
used in operating activities during the three months ended March
31, 2018.  The increase of $50,007 in net cash used in operating
activities is primarily attributable to a significant increase in
the Company's net loss from $1,091,122 in the three months ended
March 31, 2018 to $1,643,639 in the three months ended March 31,
2019, offset by an increase in operating assets of approximately
$80,000 and an increase in loss on extinguishment of debt of
$363,468.

Net cash used in investing activities during the period ended March
31, 2019, decreased approximately $66,000 from approximately
$171,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to
the same period in 2018.  This decrease is attributable to a
reduction of $66,000 in the amount of fixed assets purchased during
the three-month period ended March 31, 2019.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $773,714 for the
three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to $683,260 for the
three months ended 2018.  The increase in net cash provided by
financing activities is attributable to $800,000 in proceeds from
the sale of equity in private placement offering in the three
months ended in 2019 compared to approximately $683,000 in proceeds
from the sale of convertible notes in the three month period ended
March 31 2018, net of repayments.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/VAB6IO

                          About Grom Social

Headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida, Formerly known as
Illumination America, Inc., Grom Social Enterprises, Inc. --
http://www.gromsocial.com-- is a social media, technology and
entertainment company that focuses on delivering content to
children between the ages of 5 and 16 in a safe and secure
environment that can be monitored by parents or other guardians.
The Company has several operating subsidiaries, including Grom
Social, which delivers its content through mobile and desktop
environments (web portal and several Apps) that entertain children,
allow kids to interact with their peers, get relevant news, play
proprietary games, while also teaching good digital citizenship.
The Company also owns and operates Top Draw Animation, Inc., which
produces award-winning 2D animation content for some of the largest
international media companies in the world.  The Company also owns
Grom Educational Services, which has provided web filtering
services for up to an additional two million children across 3,700
schools.

BF Borgers CPA PC, in Lakewood, Colorado, the Company's auditor
since 2015, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report
dated April 16, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, stating that the
Company has incurred significant operating losses since inception
and has a working capital deficit which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Grom Social reported a net loss of $4.87 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $6.04 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Grom Social had $18.81
million in total assets, $12.02 million in total liabilities, and
$6.78 million in total stockholders' equity.


HOLLANDER SLEEP: Case Summary & 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Lead Debtor: Hollander Sleep Products, LLC
             330 Madison Avenue, 27th Floor
             New York, NY 10017

Business Description: Founded in 1953 and headquartered in Boca
                      Raton, Florida, Hollander --
                      https://www.hollander.com -- designs,
                      manufactures, and markets utility bedding
                      products that it sells to a variety of
                      prominent retailers, distributors, and
                      hotels.  Hollander supplies bed, pillow,
                      and mattress pad under owned and licensed
                      brands which include I AM, Pacific Coast
                      Feather, Live Comfortably, Great Sleep,
                      Restful Nights, Beautyrest, Ralph Lauren,
                      Chaps, and Calvin Klein.  The Debtors employ
                      approximately 2,370 people in the United
                      States and Canada.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: May 19, 2019

Seven affiliates that simultaneously filed voluntary petitions
seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                    Case No.
     ------                                    --------
     Hollander Sleep Products, LLC             19-11608
     Dream II Holdings, LLC                    19-11607
     Hollander Home Fashions Holdings, LLC     19-11609
     Hollander Sleep Products Kentucky, LLC    19-11610
     Pacific Coast Feather, LLC                19-11611
     Pacific Coast Feather Cushion, LLC        19-11612
     Hollander Sleep Products Canada Limited   19-11613

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Debtors' Counsel: Joshua A. Sussberg, P.C.
                  Christopher T. Greco, P.C.
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
                  601 Lexington Avenue
                  New York, New York 10022
                  Tel: (212) 446-4800
                  Fax: (212) 446-4900
                  Email: joshua.sussberg@kirkland.com
                         christopher.greco@kirkland.com

                    - and -

                  Joseph M. Graham, Esq.
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                  KIRKLAND & ELLIS INTERNATIONAL LLP
                  300 North LaSalle
                  Chicago, Illinois 60654
                  Tel: (312) 862-2000
                  Fax: (312) 862-2200
                  Email: joe.graham@kirkland.com

Debtors'
Interim
Management
Services
Provider:         CARL MARKS ADVISORY GROUP LLC

Debtors'
Financial
Advisor and
Investment
Banker:           HOULIHAN LOKEY CAPITAL, INC.

Debtors'
Notice &
Claims
Agent:            OMNI MANAGEMENT GROUP
                  https://is.gd/rupb3l

Debtors'
Conflict
Matters
Counsel:          PROSKAUER ROSE LLP

Estimated Assets
(on a consolidated basis): $100 million to $500 million

Estimated Liabilities
(on a consolidated basis): $100 million to $500 million

The petitions were signed by Marc Pfefferle, chief executive
officer.

A full-text copy of  Dream II Holdings' petition is available for
free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb19-11607.pdf

List of Debtors' 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
1. Roind Hometex Co Ltd                Vendor          $5,655,096
3225 E Warm Springs Rd
Las Vegas, NV 89120

2. Funing Jincheng Home                Vendor          $5,273,061
Textile Co Ltd
Attn: Fn
Group 5, Bisheng Neighborhood
Committee
Funing Economical Devt Zone
Jiangsu, 224400 China
Email: David.Qian@Fw-Textile.Com

3. Invista Inc.                        Vendor          $5,023,243
Attn: Boykin
Bank of America
P.O. Box, #742926
Atlanta, GA 30374-2926
Tel: 770-792-4192
Email: Danielle.Boykin@INVISTA.COM

4. Hangzhou Chuangyuan Feather Co Ltd  Vendor          $5,001,799
Attn: Fumingfang
No 5 Xinda Rd
Miaojia Village
Hangzhou, Suoqian Town
China
Email: fumingfang@cyfeather.cn

5. Zhejiang Hengdi                     Vendor          $3,882,944
Bedding Co Ltd
Attn: Terry Wang
No 168 Hebeilou Fulou Village
Xintang St
Hangzhou, China
Email: wanghr@mail.lqfeather.com

6. Zhejiang Liuqiao Home Textile       Vendor          $3,465,270
Attn: Zhu
Xinfeng Village-Xingtang St Zhejiang
Hangzhou, 311201, China
Email: amy715@mail.lqfeather.com

7. Wuhu Fine Textile International     Vendor          $3,419,367
Trading Co Ltd
Attn: Wan
321 Jingxi Rd
Wanzhi Town, China
Email: Mandy@Ahfantai.Com

8. Packaging Corp Of America           Vendor          $3,341,952
Attn: Cerasuolo
36596 Treasury Center
Chicago, IL 60694-6500
Tel: 514 239 3993
Email: Ceraldesign@Hotmail.Com

9. Sun Fiber Sales LLC                 Vendor          $2,694,931
Attn: Clinton, Ar Contact
Rosenthal & Rosenthal Inc
P.O. Box 88926
Chicago, IL 60695-1926
Email: stefanie.clinton@sunfiberllc.com

10. Zhejiang Wanxiang                  Vendor          $2,492,406
Bedding Co Ltd
Attn: Xu
Wulian Xintang Xiaosgan Hangzhou
Zhejiang, China
Email: mxu@wxbedding.com

11. Wuxi Jielong Textile Co Ltd        Vendor          $2,418,091
Attn: Xie
Shuang Miao Economic &
Development Zone
Jiangsu
Wuxi, 214187 China
Tel: 510-88086388
Email: jerry@wuxijielong.com

12. Zhejiang Liuqiao                   Vendor          $2,189,154
Industrial Co Ltd
Attn: Sheng
288 Dongkang Rd
Xiaoshan District
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
China
Email: Shenzf@Mail.Lqfeather.Com

13. Topocean Consolidation Services    Vendor          $1,924,219
Attn: Wong
99 W Hawthorne Ave, Ste 604
Valley Stream, NY 11580
Tel: 7910112
Email: wiltong@topocean.com

14. Nap Industries Inc.                Vendor          $1,882,143
667 Kent Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11249

15. The Sea Feather Limited            Vendor          $1,840,641
Company Of Luan
Attn: Bian
East Gaocheng Rd
Economic Tech Devt Area
Anhui, Luan 237161 China
Email: tina.bian@theseafeather.com

16. Hangzhou Huoju Down                Vendor          $1,719,436
Products Co Ltd
Attn: Wu
Xintang Residential Community
Xiaoshan District
Hangzhou, Zhejiang China
Email: Hjwjf@Hzhjyr.Com

17. Wujiang City Xinyi                 Vendor          $1,718,438
Textile Co Ltd
Attn: Chen
Daxie Village Bali Shengze
(South Ring Rd 3)
Jiangsu, China

18. Anhui Rongdi Down                  Vendor          $1,673,141
Product Co Ltd
Attn: Wei
Fudu Industrial Park
Anhui, Wuwei
China
Email: waf72211@sina.com

19. Elite Comfort Solutions LLC        Vendor          $1,506,538
Attn: Griffith
Elite Comfort Solutions LLC
P.O. Box 603397
Charlotte, NC 28260-3397
Tel: 770-683-8271
Email: pgriffith@elitefoam.com

20. Span America                       Vendor          $1,440,880
Attn: Jackson
70 Commerce Center
Greenville, SC 29615
Tel: 678-6978
Email: Cjackson@Spanamerica.Com

21. Stein Fibers Ltd                   Vendor          $1,225,238
Attn: Sprague, Sales
P.O. Box 714522
Cincinnati, OH 45271-4522
Tel: 599-2804
Email: Richard@steinfibers.com

22. Cixi Jiangnan Chemical Fiber       Vendor          $1,217,846
159 Lingqiao Rd
Ningbo, China

23. Qingdao Fuyuan Arts &              Vendor          $1,120,319
Crafts Co Ltd
Attn: Cathy
Rm 419 No 97 Fuzhou South Rd
Qingdao, China
Email: cathy@qd-fuyuan.com

24. Be Be Jan Pakistan Limited         Vendor          $1,017,821
Attn: Bebe
Square No 7 Chak No R.B
Faisalabad, Pakistan

25. Wuxi Yinxin Printing Co Ltd        Vendor          $1,010,717
Attn: Ma
Qian Lane
Luoshe Town, Wuxi City
Jiangsu Province, China
Email: Evanma@Wuxiyinxin.Com

26. Nan Ya Plastics                    Vendor            $904,004
Corporation America
P.O. Box 402634
Atlanta, GA 30384

27. International Paper (Edi)          Vendor            $797,481
Attn: Davis
6211 Descanso Ave
Buena Park, CA 90620
Tel: 512-0404
Email: mary.davis1@ipaper.com

28. Domfoam Inc                        Vendor            $760,385
Attn: Sansalone
8785 Boul Langelier
St Leonard, QC H1P 2C9
Canada
Tel: 325-8120
Email: Julie@Domfoam.Com

29. Hangzhou Huaying Xintang Down      Vendor             $758,683
Xixu Village
Xintang St, Xiaosha
Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province
China

30. Oracle America Inc.                Vendor             $732,377
Attn: Oracle America Inc
P.O. Box 203448
Dallas, TX 75320-3448

31. Kuehne & Nagel                     Vendor             $387,576
Attn: Kirlew
77 Foster Crescent
Mississuaga, ON L5R 0K1
Canada
Tel: 502-4173
Email: Paulette.Kirlew@Huehne-
Nagel.Com

32. US CBP                             Vendor             $666,199
1300 Pennsylvania Ave Nw
Washington, DC 20229
Tel: 1 (877) CBP-5511

33. Kapstone Container Corp            Vendor             $658,087
Attn: Brest, Strategic Account Manager
2370 Sullivan Rd
College Park, GA 30337
Tel: 935.8526
Email: mike.brest@kapstonepaper.com

34. C H Robinson                       Vendor             $611,420
P.O. Box 9121
Minneapolis, MN 55480-9121

35. AV Logistics LLC                   Vendor             $498,586
Attn: Palencia
P.O. Box 5657
Carol Stream, IL 60197-5657
Tel: 6440936
Email: SPALENCIA@AV-LOGISTICS.COM

36. Shi International                  Vendor             $410,744
P.O. Box 952121
Dallas, TX 75395-2121

37. Invista Canada                     Vendor             $408,263
P.O. Box B2918U
P.O. Box 11585
Montreal, QC H3C 5N7
Canada
Tel: 821-5954
Email: A/R - CHRISTINE

38. Zhejiang Saifang                   Vendor            $387,987
Textile Technology Co Ltd
Attn: Tang
Santou Cun Industrial Park
Zhejiang
Daicun Town, Hangzhou
China

39. Invista S.A.R.L.                   Vendor            $336,341
7813 Collections Ctr. Dr
Chicago, IL 60693-7913

40. Progress Container & Display       Vendor            $297,160
Attn: Markham
635 Patrick Mill Rd Sw
Winder, GA 30680
Tel: 4252071
Email: tmarkham@progresscontainer.com

41. Strands Textile Mills Pvt Ltd      Vendor            $283,940
Attn: Sharma
Plot 3 270-271 Sector 4
Gandhidham Guja, 370230
India
Email: merchant@strandstextile.com

42. Exeter 25 Keystone LLC             Vendor             $276,975
101 West Elm Street, Suite 600
Conshocken, PA 19428

43. Printcraft Co Inc.                 Vendor             $270,188
259 City Lake Rd
Lexington, NC 27293

44. Jasztex Fiber Inc.                 Vendor             $260,513
     
Attn: Jakubik, Ar Contact 61 Hymus
Ponte-Claire, QC H9R 1E2
Canada
Tel: 697-3096
Email: NATHALIE@JASZTEX.COM

45. Kamyk Daunen S.R.O.                Vendor             $254,578
Kamyk Nad Vitavou Cp 179
Pribram, S 262063
Czech Republic

46. Navarpluma S.L.                    Vendor             $244,576
Poligono Industrial Arazuri Orcoyen
Arazuri, 31170
Spain

47. Majestic/Amb Pico                  Vendor             $238,286
Rivera Assoc Llc
13191 Crossroads Pkwy North
City of Industry, CA 91746-3497

48. Polypack Corporation Ltd           Vendor             $227,485
Attn: Catald o, General Manager
7900 E Jarry St
Montreal, QC H1J 1H1
Canada
Tel: 353-1710
Email: phil500cataldo@gmail.com

49. Atlas Feather Processing Corp      Vendor             $204,766
64 Greenpoint Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11222-1504

50. Dusobox Corporation                Vendor             $204,685
2501 Investors Row, Ste 500
Orlando, FL 32837
Tel: 800-393-5120


HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: Seeks to Hire Akin Gump as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital Acquisition LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as their legal counsel.

The services to be rendered by Akin Gump are:

     (a) advise the Debtors of their rights, powers and duties in
the continued operation of their business and the management of
their properties;

     (b) advise the Debtors with respect to the conduct of their
bankruptcy cases, including all of the legal and administrative
requirements in Chapter 11;

     (c) take all necessary actions at the Debtors' direction to
protect and preserve their estates, including the prosecution or
defense of any action commenced against them;

     (d) assist in obtaining debtor-in-possession financing;

     (e) advise the Debtors in connection with any potential sale
of their assets;

     (f) advise the Debtors regarding tax matters;

     (g) represent the Debtors in negotiations with representatives
of creditors and other parties in interest; and

     (j) negotiate and prepare the Debtors' bankruptcy plan and
related documents.

Akin Gump's standard hourly rates are:

     Partners           $925 – $1,755
     Counsel            $710 – $1,420
     Associates         $510 – $975
     Paraprofessionals  $100 – $435

The Akin Gump attorneys with primary responsibility for providing
services to the Debtors are:

     Scott Alberino (Partner, Financial Restructuring)       
$1,475
     Sarah Link Schultz (Partner, Financial Restructuring)   
$1,425
     Kevin Eide (Senior Counsel, Financial Restructuring)    
$1,100
     Chance Hiner (Associate, Financial Restructuring)         
$660
     Miles Taylor (Associate, Financial Restructuring)         
$560

Scott Alberino, Esq., a partner at Akin Gump, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Alberino disclosed that his firm has not agreed to any variations
from, or alternatives to, its standard or customary billing
arrangements; and that no Akin Gump professional has varied his
rate based on the geographic location of the Debtors' cases.  

Mr. Alberino also disclosed that the Debtors have already approved
Akin Gump's proposed hourly billing rates and its budget and
staffing plan for the first four months of the Debtors' cases.

The firm can be reached through:

     Scott Alberino, Esq.
     Kate Doorley, Esq.
     Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
     1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
     Washington, D.C. 20036
     Tel: (202) 887-4000
     Fax: (202) 887-4288
     Email: salberino@akingump.com
     Email: kdoorley@akingump.com

              About Hospital Acquisition

Headquartered in Plano, Texas, and founded in 1992, Hospital
Acquisition LLC and its affiliates are operators of long-term
acute care hospitals.

Hospital Acquisition LLC and its subsidiaries sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case
No. 19-10998) on May 6, 2019.  The petition was signed by James
Murray, chief executive officer and manager. The Debtor had
estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.  

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as counsel; Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as
financial advisor; BRG Capital Advisors LLC as investment banker;
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.


HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: Taps Houlihan Lokey as Financial Advisor
--------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital Acquisition LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire
Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. as their financial advisor and
investment banker.

The services to be provided by Houlihan Lokey are:

     (a) advise the Debtors in the preparation of an offering
memorandum and assist in the distribution of selected information,
documents and other materials;

     (b) assist the Debtors in soliciting, coordinating and
evaluating indications of interest and proposals regarding any
transaction from current or potential lenders, equity investors,
acquirers and strategic partners;

     (c) assist the Debtors in negotiating the transaction;

     (d) provide testimony and expert advice regarding financial
matters related to the transaction;

     (e) attend meetings of the Debtors' Board of Managers or the
"transaction committee," creditor groups, official constituencies,
and other interested parties; and

     (f) assist the Debtors in acquiring and negotiating financing.


Houlihan Lokey will be paid as follows:

     (I) Monthly Fee. During the term of the engagement, the
Debtors shall pay Houlihan Lokey a non-refundable cash fee of
$125,000. Each monthly fee shall be earned upon the firm's receipt
thereof. Beginning with the fifth monthly fee, 50% of the monthly
fees paid to Houlihan Lokey shall be credited against the next
"transaction fee" to which the firm becomes entitled except that in
no event shall such transaction fee be reduced below zero; and

     (II) Transaction Fee.  The Debtors shall pay Houlihan Lokey
these transaction fees:

         (A) Restructuring Transaction Fee. Upon the earlier to
occur of:

             (1) in the case of an out-of-court restructuring
transaction, the effectiveness of all necessary documentation to
consummate the transaction; and

             (2) in the case of an in-court restructuring
transaction, the date of consummation of a plan of reorganization
or liquidation under Chapter 11 or 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, the
Debtors shall pay Houlihan Lokey a cash fee of $1.85 million;

         (B) Comprehensive Sale Transaction Fee. Upon the closing
of a comprehensive sale transaction, the Debtors shall pay Houlihan
Lokey a cash fee equal to the greater of (1) $1.85 million and (2)
2 percent multiplied by the "aggregate gross consideration."  In
the event that both the restructuring and comprehensive sale
transactions occur, the firm shall earn the greater of the
restructuring transaction fee or the comprehensive sale transaction
fee but not both.

         (C) Partial Sale Transaction Fee. Upon the closing of each
partial sale transaction, the Debtors shall pay Houlihan Lokey a
cash fee equal to the greater of (1) $950,000 and (2) 2 percent
multiplied by the AGC.

         (D) Financing Transaction Fee. Upon the closing of each
financing transaction, the Debtors shall pay Houlihan Lokey,
directly from the gross proceeds of such transaction, a cash fee
equal to the greater of $400,000 and the sum of (1) 2 percent of
the gross proceeds of any indebtedness raised or committed that is
senior to other indebtedness of the Debtors, unsubordinated to
other indebtedness of the Debtors and secured by a first priority
lien; (2) 3 percent of the gross proceeds of any indebtedness
raised or committed that is secured by a lien (other than a first
lien), is unsecured or is subordinated; and (3) 5 percent of the
gross proceeds of all equity or equity-linked securities placed or
committed.  However, to the extent that a "debtor in possession
financing" or "exit financing" is funded by any of the existing
owners, shareholders, employees, creditors or any entity comprising
the Debtors, the financing transaction fee shall be reduced by 25
percent except that in no event shall such fee be reduced below
$400,000.

Geoffrey Coutts, director of Houlihan Lokey, assures the court that
his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached at:

     Geoffrey Coutts
     Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.
     10250 Constellation Blvd., 5th Fl.
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Tel: 310-553-8871
     Fax: 310-553-2173

              About Hospital Acquisition

Headquartered in Plano, Texas, and founded in 1992, Hospital
Acquisition LLC and its affiliates are operators of long-term
acute care hospitals.

Hospital Acquisition LLC and its subsidiaries sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case
No. 19-10998) on May 6, 2019.  The petition was signed by James
Murray, chief executive officer and manager. The Debtor had
estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.  

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as counsel; Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as
financial advisor; BRG Capital Advisors LLC as investment banker;
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.


HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: Taps Prime Clerk as Administrative Advisor
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hospital Acquisition LLC and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire
Prime Clerk LLC as administrative advisor.

The firm will provide bankruptcy administrative services, which
include the solicitation, balloting and tabulation of votes for the
Debtors' bankruptcy plan, and assisting them in managing
distributions to creditors.

Prime Clerk will charge these hourly fees:

     Claim and Noticing Rates:

     Analyst                             $30 - $50
     Technology Consultant               $35 - $95
     Consultant/Senior Consultant       $65 - $165
     Director                          $175 - $195
     COO/Executive VP                    No charge  

     Solicitation, Balloting and Tabulation Rates:

     Solicitation Consultant                  $190
     Director of Solicitation                 $210

Benjamin Steele, vice president of Prime Clerk, disclosed in court
filings that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Prime Clerk can be reached through:

     Benjamin J. Steele
     Prime Clerk LLC
     830 Third Avenue, 9th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Direct: 212-257-5455
     Mobile: 917-744-6969

              About Hospital Acquisition

Headquartered in Plano, Texas, and founded in 1992, Hospital
Acquisition LLC and its affiliates are operators of long-term
acute care hospitals.

Hospital Acquisition LLC and its subsidiaries sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case
No. 19-10998) on May 6, 2019.  The petition was signed by James
Murray, chief executive officer and manager. The Debtor had
estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.  

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as counsel; Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as
financial advisor; BRG Capital Advisors LLC as investment banker;
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.


HOSPITAL ACQUISITION: U.S. Trustee Forms 5-Member Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on May 17 appointed
five creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Hospital Acquisition LLC and
its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     (1) Cantu Construction and Development, Inc.
         Attn: Hector Perez
         5221 N. McColl
         McAllen, TX 78504
         Phone: 956-631-1273   

     (2) Doc-LifeCare Planoltach, LLC
         c/o Physicians Realty L.P.  
         Attn: Jeffrey Theiler
         309 N. Water St., Suite 500
         Milwaukee, WI 53202
         Phone: 414-367-5610
         Fax: 414-249-4720   

     (3) Kettering Health Network
         d/b/a Sycamore Hospital
         Attn: Joseph Feller
         1 Prestige Place
         Miamisburg, OH 45342
         Phone: 937-762-1020
         Fax: 937-762-1039

     (4) New Source Medical, LLC
         Attn: Courtney Hall
         9913 Shelbyville Rd, Suite 203
         Louisville, KY 40223
         Phone: 502-261-0050
         Fax: 502-416-0483

     (5) Freedom Medical, Inc.
         Attn: Eric Wenzel
         219 Welsh Pool Rd.
         Exton, PA 19341
         Phone: 610-903-0200
         Fax: 610-903-0177

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                    About Hospital Acquisition

Headquartered in Plano, Texas, and founded in 1992, Hospital
Acquisition LLC and its affiliates are operators of long-term
acute care hospitals.

Hospital Acquisition LLC and its subsidiaries sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del., Lead Case
No. 19-10998) on May 6, 2019.  The petition was signed by James
Murray, chief executive officer and manager. The Debtor had
estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of
$100 million to $500 million.  

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as counsel; Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as
financial advisor; BRG Capital Advisors LLC as investment banker;
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.


INTERNATIONAL PLACE: $195M Sale of Vienna Property to T&H Approved
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brian F. Kenney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia authorized International Place at Tysons,
LLC's private sale of the real property located at 8201 Leesburg
Pike, Vienna, Virginia, together with the improvements thereon, to
Tepe & Hisar, LLC for $19.5 million, free and clear of liens,
claims, and interests of any kind or nature whatsoever.

The United Bank Compromise, the KKM Compromise, and the IPT
Compromise are all approved and the Debtor, United Bank, and KKM
are authorized and directed to implement the terms of the
Compromises.  At Closing, the Debtor will be, and is authorized,
empowered, and directed, to make the disbursements at Closing on
the sales of the IPT/8133 Properties to United Bank and KM provided
for under the United Bank Compromise and the KKM Compromise.

Specifically, at Closing, the IPT/8133 Debtors will (a) pay United
Bank the United Bank Settlement Payment and any other amounts
provided for above from the proceeds arising from the sale of the
IPT/8133 Properties pursuant to the Agreement and the 8133
Contract; and (b) will pay KKM the KKM Settlement Payment and any
other amounts provided for from the proceeds arising from the sale
of the IPT/8133 Properties pursuant to the Agreement and the 8133
Contract.

The IPT/8133 Debtors and Andrew S. Garrett are also authorized,
empowered, and directed to execute and deliver to United Bank and
KM, at Closing, written general releases of claims, releasing
United Bank, KM and their respective parent corporations,
subsidiaries, predecessors-in—interest, affiliates, directors,
officers, employees, agents and attorneys from any and all claims,
causes of action, suits or damages (including claims for attorneys'
fees) that the IPT/8133 Debtors and/or Andrew S. Garrett ever had
or now have, jointly or severally, against any or all of the
Released Parties, jointly or severally.

The described releases to be executed and delivered to United Bank
and KKM at Closing will be in a form and substance acceptable to
United Bank and KKM in all respects.

The closing in connection with the Agreement and the 8133 Contract
will occur simultaneously and in no event later than 11:00 a.m. on
June 28, 2019, and United Bank will receive the United Bank
Settlement Payment and the other amounts referenced above and KKM
will receive the KKM Settlement Payment and the other amounts
referenced by 3:00 p.m. on June 28, 2019.  The sale to T&H is not
conditioned on the closing of the sale of the 8133 Property.

The automatic stay provisions of Bankruptcy Code section 362 are
vacated and modified to the extent necessary to implement the terms
and conditions of the Agreement and the provisions of the Order.

The Order will be effective immediately and will not be subject to
the stay mandated by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h).

An expense reimbursement of up to $50,000 is approved in favor of
Omar Ayesh for his costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees,
incurred by Ayesh in connection with and during the course of his
attempts to purchase the IPT Property from the Debtor during the
pendency of the bankruptcy case, subject to submission by Ayesh to
the Debtor of invoices, receipts, or other documentation evidencing
the amount of the Expense Reimbursement to be paid to Ayesh
pursuant to the Order.

At the closing of the sale of the IPT Property to T&H, or to any
other person or entity, the Debtor will be, and is authorized,
empowered, and directed, to pay the Expense Reimbursement to Ayesh
from the proceeds arising from the sale of the IPT Property.
Within one business day after the entry of the Order, the Debtor is
authorized and directed to, (i) instruct the escrow agent holding
the $5 million deposit referenced in the Ayesh Purchase Agreement
to promptly return the Ayesh Deposit to Ayesh, and, (ii) take any
and all other actions necessary to cooperate with Ayesh to ensure
the prompt return of the Ayesh Deposit to Ayesh.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Order is available for free
at:

http://bankrupt.com/misc/International_Place_127_Order.pdf

                   About Int'l Place at Tysons

International Place at Tysons is a mixed-use development project by
Stafford, Virginia-based developer, Garrett Cos.  It owns a real
property located at 8201 Leesburg Pike, Vienna.  Meanwhile,
Leesburg's key asset is a real property located at 8133 Leesburg
Pike, Vienna.

The owners of the project, International Place at Tysons, LLC, and
8133 Leesburg Pike, LLC, filed petitions for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case Nos. 18-10431 and 18-10432) on
Feb. 6, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Andrew S. Garrett, president of manager,
each debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $10
million to $50 million in debt.

The Hon. Brian F. Kenney oversees the cases.

Hirschler Fleischer is the Debtors' legal counsel.


JOHN COBLE: $309K Sale of Delphi Property Approved
--------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert E. Grant of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Indiana authorized John Richard Coble's sale of
approximately 11.992 acres of farm in Carroll County, Indiana,
commonly known as 6106 W. 1000 N., Delphi, Indiana; and the three
acres contiguous to the Carroll County Farm containing the Debtor's
residence, to Jason James and Krystal Ann Harmon for $308,500, less
certain adjustments to be made at closing.

The sale is free and clear of liens, claims and interests, in the
manner provided in the Purchase Agreement.

The 14-day stay imposed by Rule 6004(h) of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure is waived.

The Debtor is authorized to (i) provide payment from the sale
proceeds of the Real Estate Commission, and (ii) pay the net sale
proceeds to Co-Alliance.    

John Richard Coble filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ind.
Case No. 17-40013) on Jan. 14, 2017 and is represented by Samuel
Hodson(KS), Esq. -- shodson@taftlaw.com -- at Taft Stettinius &
Hollister LLP.


JONES ENERGY: Exits Bankruptcy After Chapter 11 Plan Confirmed
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jones Energy, Inc., on May 17, 2019, disclosed that it is emerging
from bankruptcy.  The Company emerges following satisfaction of all
of the conditions to effectiveness under the Company's prepackaged
chapter 11 plan (the "Plan"), previously confirmed by the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the
"Court") less than two weeks ago on May 6, 2019.  The Plan fully
equitizes the Company's outstanding prepetition funded debt,
authorizes the incurrence of an exit facility, and fully satisfies
all trade, customer, employee, royalty, working, and other mineral
interest claims without interruption in the ordinary course of
business. The Company emerges stronger, well-capitalized, and
strategically positioned to maximize the value of its asset
portfolio.

Mr. Carl Giesler, Director and Chief Executive Officer, stated,
"Our successful record-pace emergence from chapter 11 reflects
extraordinary effort by all parties involved.  Up front, we thank
our employees for their persistence, patience, and professionalism
throughout this process.  We also thank our mineral interest
holders, vendors, and suppliers for their steadfastness and
cooperation as well as the various legal and financial advisors for
their judgments and guidance.  Last but not least, we thank the
First Lien Notes and Unsecured Notes stakeholder groups for their
confidence in the Company's assets and future business strategy as
well as for their foresight in resetting the Company with a clean
balance sheet.  Jones Energy emerges from chapter 11 in a strong
financial position with the flexibility to optimize the value of
its assets for all our stakeholders."

Distributions to Prepetition Noteholders

On the Effective Date and pursuant to the Plan, the Company's
existing securities were cancelled and the Company issued 4,436,130
shares of Class A common stock in Jones Energy II, Inc. (the "Class
A Common Stock"), 9,843,870 shares of Class B common stock in Jones
Energy II, Inc. (the "Class B Common Stock"), together with a
corresponding number of common units in Jones Energy Holdings II,
LLC (the "Common Units" and, together with the Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock, the "New Common Equity"), and 2,520,000
5-year warrants convertible into New Common Equity (the "New
Warrants").  The Company expects that its newly issued Class A
common stock and New Warrants will be quoted on the OTC Pink Market
under the ticker symbols JEII and JEII.W, respectively.

The holders of the First Lien Notes received their pro rata share
of 96% of the New Common Equity, or 30.464 shares of New Common
Equity per $1,000 principal amount of First Lien Notes.  The
holders of the Unsecured Notes received their pro rata share of 4%
of the New Common Equity, or 1.017 shares of New Common Equity per
$1,000 principal amount of Unsecured Notes due 2022 or 1.034 shares
of New Common Equity per $1,000 principal amount of Unsecured Notes
due 2023.  The distributed New Common Equity is subject to dilution
by the Management Incentive Plan (as defined in the Plan) and the
New Warrants.

Company Enters New $225 Million RBL Agreement

Jones Energy on May 17 also disclosed that it has entered into a
new reserve-based credit facility (the "Facility") with a group of
banks led by TD Securities and an initial borrowing base of $225
million. The Company has initially elected an aggregate commitment
of $150 million and will have no outstanding borrowings upon
emergence.

Regarding the new facility, Mr. Carl Giesler commented, "The
substantial capital commitment from our bank group highlights the
operating momentum achieved by our team over the past nine months
and the significant progress made to position the Company to
enhance the value of our assets.  Our ongoing optimization
initiatives have yielded strong well results that continue to
outpace expectations and have already effected substantial
reductions to our cost structure.  We recognize the persistent
efforts of our team and our bank group in successfully securing
this liquidity for the Company, particularly given the current
challenging financing environment for small-cap E&P companies
generally and especially those emerging from restructuring.  We
look forward to working with our new syndicate going-forward."

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as legal counsel and Evercore
Group, LLC is acting as financial advisor to Jones Energy.  Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC is the Company's restructuring
advisor.

Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP is serving as legal counsel and
Lazard Freres & Co. LLC is acting as financial advisor to the ad
hoc group of first lien noteholders. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is
serving as legal counsel and Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc. is acting
as financial advisor to the ad hoc group of crossover noteholders.

                       About Jones Energy

Austin, Texas-based Jones Energy, Inc.
--http://www.jonesenergy.com/-- is an independent oil and natural
gas company engaged in the exploration, development, production and
acquisition of oil and gas properties in the Anadarko Basin in
Oklahoma and Texas.

Jones Energy and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 19-32112) on
April 14, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors had total
assets of $405,575,000 and liabilities of $1,116,839,000.

The cases are assigned to Judge David R. Jones.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP as their bankruptcy counsel; Jackson Walker LLP
as co-counsel with Kirkland and as conflicts counsel; Evercore
Group LLC as financial advisor; Alvarez & Marsal North America,
LLC, as restructuring advisor; Deloitte Tax LLP as tax
restructuring advisor; Baker Botts LLP as special corporate
counsel; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring, LLC as its claims,
noticing and solicitation agent.


KRUGER PACKAGING: DBRS Assigns Provisional BB(high) Issuer Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DBRS Limited assigned a provisional Issuer Rating of BB (high) and
a provisional Senior Unsecured Notes rating of BB (high) with a
recovery rating of RR3 to Kruger Packaging Holdings L.P. (KPH or
the Company). All trends are Stable. KPH is expected to issue $125
million of Senior Unsecured Notes, the proceeds of which will be
used to repay senior bank term debt and pay a distribution to
unitholders that on a pro forma basis will slightly weaken
leverage.

The ratings benefit from KPH's position in the less volatile paper
packaging industry when compared to other forest product
sub-sectors, its cost-effective mills and the unique properties of
some of its products that give the Company a competitive advantage.
The conservative balance sheet and low leverage for the rating
category are also supportive of the fact that they should give KPH
some downside protection. In 2019, DBRS expects leverage as
expressed by adjusted debt-to-EBITDA to be around 1.9 times and
adjusted cash flow-to-debt at around 40%, levels that are strong
for the ratings. However, the ratings are constrained by the
Company's niche position and lack of diversification in the broader
paper and forest products industry, its low (albeit increasing)
forward integration into its corrugated box plants, its exposure to
volatile input costs and the overall underlying volatility of the
forest products industry.

Following the rebuild of its Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, newsprint
machine into a containerboard machine that was completed in 2017,
the Company is now well positioned to produce high-strength
light-weight recycled linerboard which, due to its properties,
provides a competitive advantage compared to the traditional
containerboard offered by other North American manufacturers. KPH
also operates a smaller white top linerboard and paperboard
facility in Montreal, as well as two corrugated box plants in
Québec and Ontario. Today, the Company's forward integration is
low when compared to some of its major peers, with about 35% of its
containerboard production being used as an input into its two
corrugated box plants (including trades). Increased forward
integration would help further improve margins and create a more
stable demand for its linerboard products. In 2018, the Company
generated about 80% of its revenues and EBITDA from its packaging
activities.

KPH also operates two pulp and paper facilities in Trois-Rivieres
that produce Bleached-Thermo-Mechanical-Pulp (BTMP) and uncoated
groundwood paper. While BTMP production is almost exclusively sold
to Kruger Inc.'s Specialty Paper division, uncoated groundwood
paper is sold to third parties, mostly in the newsprint and
publishing industry and to paper converters. The North American
demand for newsprint has been in secular decline for many years
now, but the Company has appropriately scaled down its operations
in order to preserve its profitability. The pulp and paper
operations generated about 20% of revenues and EBITDA in 2018, a
proportion that is expected to decline further.

Going forward, DBRS expects KPH to continue to benefit from its
position in the containerboard market, improve its integration and
manage its financial policy in a manner that is commensurate with
the current ratings. Deterioration in credit metrics caused by a
change in financial policy and/or difficulties in its end-markets
could cause the ratings to be downgraded. On the other hand,
continued strong credit metrics, together with significant
improvements in the Company's business profile, could lead to
positive rating action.

Notes: All figures are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.


LIBERTY MUTUAL: S&P Rates EUR500MM Junior Subordinated Debt 'BB+'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it has assigned its 'BB+' debt rating
to Liberty Mutual Group Inc.'s (LMGI) issuance of EUR500 million
junior subordinated debentures due in 2059. This subordinated debt
rating is two notches below S&P's 'BBB' long-term issuer credit and
senior debt ratings on LMGI. The company has the option of
deferring interest payments for up to 10 years. There is also a
mandatory deferral trigger if the group's consolidated tangible net
worth falls below $5 billion for two consecutive quarters, which
S&P views as a remote scenario. LMGI has the option of redeeming
the debentures on May 23, 2024, and every five years thereafter.

As per S&P's methodology, it will view the subordinated notes as
having intermediate equity content for the first five years (until
20 years prior to May 16, 2044, at which time the interest rate
paid by Liberty steps up by 100 basis points if it's not redeemed).
LMGI will use the proceeds to redeem its $300 million Series B
junior subordinated notes and for general corporate purposes, which
may include repurchases of the $700 million Series A junior
subordinated notes pursuant to an ongoing tender offer. The current
restructuring will result in a lower amount of hybrid securities in
the company's capital structure, but S&P understands that LMGI's
longer-term target capital structure will include a meaningful
hybrid component.

Although its mutual structure limits its access to equity markets,
LMGI has a successful track record of raising capital in the U.S.
and European debt markets, and has utilized reinsurance
extensively, according to S&P.

"We do not expect the issuance to affect our leverage expectations
of around 24%-27% through our forecast period. Additionally, with
the hybrid being issued at a lower interest rate than the junior
subordinated debt it is replacing, we expect a slight improvement
in fixed-charge coverage, albeit within our 6x-7x expectations,"
S&P said.

  New Rating
  
  Liberty Mutual Group Inc.
  EUR500 mil Jr Sub Debt due 2059 BB+


MAI HOLDINGS: S&P Cuts ICR to 'CCC' on Weak Operating Performance
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on St.
Louis-based printing equipment and services provider MAI Holdings,
Inc. to 'CCC' from 'B'.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured notes to 'CCC' from 'B' and revised the
recovery rating to '4' from '3', indicating its expectation for
average recovery (30%-50%; rounded estimate: 30%) in the event of a
payment default.

"The downgrade reflects MAI's weaker-than-expected earnings in
recent quarters and our revised expectation for leverage above 10x
and negative  free operating cash flow (FOCF) over the next year,"
S&P said, adding that it also reflects MAI's less than adequate
liquidity and limited remaining capacity on its asset-based lending
(ABL) facility, which the company drew down to fund working capital
and meet interest obligations.

With limited remaining sources of liquidity, the company will
eventually be unable to meet its financial obligations absent
significant improvement in cash flows or access to other sources of
cash, such as through asset sales or additional equity
contributions, according to S&P. Under such a scenario, the rating
agency believes there is heightened risk the company could undergo
a distressed restructuring.

"The negative outlook reflects our view that operating performance
will remain under pressure over the next 12 months, resulting in
negative FOCF and the possibility the company could undergo a
distressed restructuring or a payment default," S&P said.

"We could lower our rating if MAI is unable to generate sufficient
cash flow such that we believe it would be unable to meet its
financial obligations," S&P said, adding that this could occur if
demand for equipment sales continues to decline as a result of
unfavorable end-market conditions or if pricing pressures persist
and if MAI is unable to successfully implement proposed cost
reduction initiatives. S&P further said it could also lower the
ratings if MAI pursues a restructuring that the rating agency
considers distressed or engages in a transaction it views as
tantamount to a default.

"We could raise our rating on MAI if the company meaningfully
improves its liquidity position, likely through improved free cash
flow generation and/or if the company receives an equity
contribution from its owners that would diminish the likelihood of
a payment default," S&P said.


MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE: S&P Raises ICR to 'BB-' on KCC Acquisition
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised the issuer credit rating on Momentive
Performance Materials Inc. to 'BB-' from 'B+', which reflects its
expectation that the company will receive some sort of group
support from the higher-rated KCC Corp.

At the same time, S&P raised its issue-level rating on the
company's first-lien secured credit facility to 'BB-' from 'B+'.
S&P removed all ratings from CreditWatch where it placed them with
negative implications April 1, 2019. The recovery rating remains
'3' on the facility.

On Sept. 13, 2018, a KCC -led consortium announced plans to acquire
100% of Momentive for about US$3 billion.  As part of the
transaction, Momentive issued a $300 million asset-based lending
(ABL) facility (unrated), a first-lien credit facility, which now
consists of a $750 million (previously $839 million) senior secured
term loan B due 2024 and a new $78 million euro tranche, and an
(unrated) $839 million Korean bank loan, guaranteed by KCC.

KCC received U.S. regulatory approval for the transaction in April
2019, and its board of directors passed the resolution in May 2019.
The transaction closed on May 15, 2019. At that time, S&P
determined that Momentive would likely receive group support from
KCC, leading the rating agency to raise the ratings by one notch.
S&P believes were Momentive to face any financial difficulties or
burden, KCC would provide some sort of indirect support, as
demonstrated by its guarantee of nearly half of Momentive's debt.
In addition, S&P believes that Momentive is important to KCC's
long-term strategy because it provides scale and geographic
diversity to its existing silicone business.

The stable outlook indicates S&P's expectation of a modest revenue
increase during the next few years, reflecting Momentive's silicone
volume growth, and improved product mix.

"We believe that GDP and key end-market growth will support the
company's volume growth. We believe total adjusted debt to EBITDA
will remain between 4x and 5x on an adjusted basis over the next 12
months," S&P said, adding that its stable outlook does not
anticipate any large debt-funded acquisitions or shareholder
rewards and it takes into account that KCC will support Momentive.

S&P said it could lower the rating on Momentive over the next 12
months if, contrary to its expectations, adjusted debt to EBITDA
exceeds 5x on a sustained basis. Factors that could contribute to
weaker operating performance include competitors lowering prices, a
sharp spike in raw material costs, or a significant reduction in or
loss of key customers' business with resulting in a decline in
EBITDA margins to 6% from the expected low-teens-percentage range,
according to the rating agency.

"We could also lower the ratings should the company engage in any
further debt repurchases if it we believed these purchases were not
opportunistic and debt repurchases that we consider to be
distressed exchange. If we do not believe KCC will provide adequate
support to Momentive, we could lower ratings on Momentive," S&P
said.

S&P said it could consider an upgrade if the company continues to
improve operating results driven by an improved product mix and an
uptick in product demand beyond the rating agency's expectations.
In an upside scenario, S&P would expect an EBITDA improvement that
is 500 basis points (bps) above its base case, with adjusted debt
to EBITDA trending toward 4x and FFO to debt approaching 20% over
the next 12 months. In addition, if its assessment of Momentive's
group status within the KCC improves, S&P could raise ratings on
Momentive.

Waterford, N.Y.-based Momentive Performance Materials Inc. is the
second-largest silicone producer worldwide. Momentive is a global
producer of specialty silicones and silanes, fused quartz, and
specialty ceramic products. For the year-ended December 2018, total
revenue was $2.7 billion.


NAUTILUS POWER: S&P Affirms 'B+' Senior Secured Term Loan Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' rating on the senior secured
term loan facility and revolving credit facility of U.S. power
project Nautilus Power LLC, which is upsizing its term loan B
facility by $55 million to perform a dividend distribution.

At the same time, S&P revised the recovery rating on the debt to
'3' (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%) from '2' (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 70%) as a result of the upsize.

The project financing comprises an about 2.2 gigawatt power
portfolio in the following markets:

Pennsylvania-Jersey-Maryland (PJM)-EMAAC

-- Lakewood Cogeneration L.P.: a 280-megawatt (MW) dual fuel
combined cycle facility

-- Essential Power Rock Springs LLC 1, 2, 3, and 4: a 744-MW
natural gas-fired peaking facility

-- Essential Power OPP LLC: a 374-MW natural gas-fired peaking
facility

Independent System Operator-New England (ISO-NE)

-- Essential Power Newington LLC: a 630-MW dual fuel combined
cycle facility

-- Essential Power Massachusetts LLC: A 254-MW portfolio of
natural gas, oil, and diesel/kerosene peaking facilities.

-- Portfolio diversification with five independent assets and no
single asset accounting for more than 35% of total EBITDA.

-- Diversity of revenue sources and markets; 60% of capacity is
installed in PJM-EMAAC, and the remaining 40% in ISO-NE. About 65%
of the total gross margin through May 2022 is contracted with
capacity payments, providing more cash flow stability in the short
and medium term. The reminder is composed of merchant energy
revenues and, in a minor proportion, ancillary revenues.

-- A relatively long asset life of the portfolio, which will help
the project to refinance its debt with a longer maturity date (S&P
is projecting a refinancing until 2044 under its base case).

-- Exposure to the spot market and long-term uncertainties
regarding capacity prices that add to the natural merchant market
volatility.

-- Refinancing risk, because the project will need to issue new
debt to repay its term loan B by its maturity date in 2024.

S&P expressed belief that cash flow will be highly stable for the
next few years but less certain in the long term due to uncleared
capacity prices and merchant market exposure. The project's
performance remains robust in the short to medium term, benefiting
from already cleared capacity prices until May 2022 (representing
over 65% of the total expected gross margin), while it has low
mandatory annual debt service (given the nature of the term loan's
structure in which an annual 1% is amortized). Therefore, S&P's
rating continues to be driven by the post-refinancing period (after
the senior secured term loan's maturity). During the
post-refinancing period, S&P models that both the term loan B and
the revolving facility are refinanced with a fully amortizing
structure due 2044, increasing the mandatory annual debt service
compared with the current structure.

"The stable outlook reflects our view that DSCRs will remain robust
in the upcoming 12 months, driven by already secured capacity
prices and our expectation that the project will continue to
capture high on-peak spark spreads. We expect DSCRs to be in the
1.4x-1.6x range, dropping to about 1.3x after the refinancing," S&P
said.

"If our projected minimum DSCR were to fall below the 1.2x area,
this would likely lead to a lower rating," S&P said.  The rating
agency said this could stem from operational problems at the plants
(low availability levels to capture capacity payments) or sustained
weaker-than-expected energy margins, adding that it could lower the
rating if it sees that the project does not sweep cash to
deleverage as expected.

"An upgrade would be possible if our projected minimum DSCR were to
improve above 1.6x and that the project successfully swept cash to
repay the existing debt, significantly reducing the outstanding
debt amount to be refinanced," S&P said.


NUSTAR LOGISTICS: S&P Rates New $500MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery to NuStar Logistics L.P.'s proposed $500 million senior
unsecured notes due 2026. The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's
expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%)
recovery in the event of a payment default.

The partnership intends to use the net proceeds from these notes to
fund future capital expenditure and repay outstanding borrowings
under its revolving credit facility. NuStar Logistics is a wholly
owned subsidiary of NuStar Energy L.P. (NuStar), which guarantees
the proposed notes. As of March 31, 2019, NuStar had $3.33 billion
of reported debt.



O'LOUGHLIN LTD: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 20 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of O'Loughlin Ltd.

                       About O'Loughlin Ltd.

O'Loughlin Ltd. is a privately held company whose principal assets
are located at 2130 Collinway Ottawa Hills, Ohio.

O'Loughlin sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-31036) on April 8, 2019.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated assets of less than $1
million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

The case has been assigned to Judge John P. Gustafson.  Diller and
Rice, LLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


PROJECT BOOST: S&P Assigns B- Issuer Credit Rating; Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issuer credit rating to
Ontario-based Project Boost Purchaser LLC.

Project Boost, a provider of data and technology platforms to the
auto industry, is being acquired by financial sponsor Thoma Bravo
LLC in a leveraged buyout (LBO). S&P said it expects the
transaction to be financed with a US$375 million first-lien term
loan, a US$175 million second-lien term loan, and sponsor equity.

The rating agency also assigned its 'B-' issue-level and '3'
recovery ratings to the company's proposed US$375 million
first-lien term loan and US$40 million revolving credit facility.
The '3' recovery rating reflects S&P's expectation of meaningful
(50%-70%; rounded estimate 65%) recovery in the event of default.

The ratings reflect Project Boost's high debt burden as reflected
in the company's 9.0x-9.5x pro forma S&P Global adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA and 2.0%-3.0% S&P Global Ratings' adjusted free
operating cash flow (FOCF)-to-debt for 2019.

"In our view, these ratios indicate the financial sponsor's high
tolerance for financial risk as well as the company's limited
financial flexibility to accommodate any operational
underperformance," S&P said, adding that it expects the company
could use its free cash flow for bolt-on acquisitions to supplement
its current product offering, absent which, the rating agency
believes Thoma Bravo could pursue shareholder-friendly policies.

"In our view, the company's contractual relationship with tenured
customers provides good predictability of cash flows, which is a
key mitigating factor that helps service Project Boost's heavy debt
burden," S&P said. "Notwithstanding the company's high leverage, we
anticipate the company to generate about US$15 million-US$20
million of S&P Global Ratings' adjusted FOCF over the next 12-24
months because of its low capital intensity and working capital
requirements, which should be sufficient to cover Project Boost's
first-lien debt amortization."

Project Boost, operating under the name Autodata, offers deep
proprietary data stack and technology platforms enabling various
participants in the value chain of the North American auto
industry. The company's small scale (2018 annual revenue of about
US$130 million) and exposure to the cyclical North American auto
industry (about 90% of revenues from the U.S.) are key credit
negative factors. In S&P's view, the company's niche focus on the
auto end market increases the topline risk during an economic
downturn, thus affecting the company's debt servicing capacity.
Although the North American auto industry has exhibited strong
growth in the past couple of years, S&P anticipates any cyclical
downturn could pressure Autodata's revenues as it did in the most
recent downturn of 2008-2009.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Autodata will be
able to support its high leverage of 9.0x-9.5x through predictable
revenue generation and continued organic EBITDA growth over the
next 12 months," S&P said. "We expect the company to generate
positive S&P Global Ratings' adjusted FOCF given its high S&P
Global Ratings' adjusted EBITDA margin and low capex requirements,
which should support its ability to service fixed charges over the
next 12 months."

S&P said it could lower the rating if the company experiences a
flat or low single-digit revenue decline leading to weaker adjusted
EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margins. In this case, the rating agency
said it would expect negative S&P's adjusted FOCF generation and
capital structure to reach unsustainable levels with S&P's adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA of above 10x on a sustained basis. This could likely
occur if the company has a weak operating performance caused by a
high customer attrition rate or inability to upsell or economic
conditions weaken significantly, according to the rating agency.

"We could raise the rating over the next 12 months if the company
maintains its revenue and EBITDA growth leading to a sustainable
improvement in credit metrics--leverage below 7.0x and S&P Global
Ratings' adjusted FOCF to debt above 5%. We expect such a scenario
could occur if the company is successful in upselling new products
to its existing and new customers while also maintaining a high
customer retention rate that could lead to material EBITDA growth,"
the rating agency said.

"At the same time, we would also expect the company's financial
sponsor to adopt a conservative financial policy of maintaining and
sustaining S&P Global Ratings' adjusted debt-to-EBITDA below 7x, by
limiting any debt-financed shareholder remuneration that could
jeopardize the company's credit quality," S&P said.


QUALITY ONE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 17 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Quality One Transport, LLC.

                    About Quality One Transport

Quality One Transport, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 19-50951) on April
25, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor had estimated
assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $1
million.  The case has been assigned to Judge Alan M. Koschik.  The
Debtor is represented by David A. Mucklow, Esq.


SCOOBEEZ INC: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
---------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on May 20 appointed three creditors
to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 cases of Scoobeez, Inc. and Scoobeez Global, Inc.

The committee members are:

     (1) Yitzchak Abadi, CEO
         Nexgen Capital, LLC
         101 Chase Avenue, Suite 206
         Lakewood, NJ 08701
         Phone: 732-415-2177

     (2) Avitus, Inc.
         Attention: Donald Reile, CCO
         175 N. 27th Street, Suite 800
         Billings, MT 59101
         Phone: 406-255-7459
         Fax: 406-255-7459
         Email: legal@avitusgroup.com

     (3) Minas Sarafian
         c/o Simonian & Simonian, PLC
         144 N. Glendale Avenue, Suite 228
         Glendale, CA 91206
         Phone: 818-405-0080, ext. 101 for Shiraz Simonian
         Email: Shiraz@Simonianlawfirm.com

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                           About Scoobeez

Scoobeez Inc. -- https://www.scoobeez.com -- operates an on demand
door-to-door logistics and real time delivery service company.  It
offers messaging, same day and preferred deliveries, and courier
services.

Scoobeez and its affiliates, Scoobeez Global, Inc. and Scoobur LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
C.D. Calif. Lead Case No. 19-14989) on April 30, 2019.

At the time of the filing, Scoobeez had estimated assets and
liabilities of between $10 million and $50 million while Scoobur
had estimated assets and liabilities of less than $50,000.
Menawhile, Scoobeez Global disclosed $6,274,654 in assets and
$7,886,579 in liabilities.

Foley & Lardner LLP is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


SOUTHEASTERN METAL: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Vara, acting U.S. trustee for Region 3, on May 20 appointed
three creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Southeastern Metal Products
LLC.

The committee members are:

     (1) Phoenix Metal Company
         Attn: Frank Cook
         P.O. Box 805
         Norcross, GA 30091
         Phone: 678-250-7008
         Fax: 770-246-8168   

     (2) Superior Productions LLC  
         Attn: Mike McKeivier
         2301 Fairwood Avenue
         Columbia, Ohio 43207
         Phone: 614-444-2181
         Fax: 614-444-4417   

     (3) Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
         Attn: Jim Buddlemeyer
         7800 Walton Parkway
         New Albany, OH 43054
         Phone: 614-289-0324

Official creditors' committees serve as fiduciaries to the general
population of creditors they represent.  They may investigate the
debtor's business and financial affairs. Committees have the right
to employ legal counsel, accountants and financial advisors at a
debtor's expense.

                      About Southeastern Metal

Southeastern Metal Products LLC is a contract manufacturing company
that specializes in fabrication and stampings for various
industries including telecommunications, transportation, appliance
and health and safety industries.

Southeastern Metal Products LLC and its affiliate, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del.
Case No. 19-10989) on May 6, 2019.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor estimated assets of between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities of between $1 million and $10 million.  The petition
was signed by David Denton, president.  

Gellert Scali Busenkell & Brown LLC and Rayburn Cooper & Durham,
P.A serves as the Debtors' counsel; Finley Group as financial
advisor; and Omni Management Group as claims and noticing agent.


ST. PETER'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to positive from stable and
affirmed its 'BB+' rating on New Jersey Health Care Facilities
Financing Authority's series 2011 and 2007 revenue bonds, issued
for St. Peter's University Hospital (St. Peter's).

"The positive outlook reflects our view of St. Peter's success in
sustaining longer-term improvement in operating trends outside of
fiscal 2017, which we believe was an anomaly year due to IT
implementation challenges" said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst
Jamie Seman. Management indicated that operating improvements in
fiscal 2018 were driven by a number of items including a management
restructuring, which will decrease St. Peter's salary and wage
expenses over time, as well as a solid increase in net patient
service revenue (driven by increases in inpatient admissions and
outpatient surgeries).

Management is anticipating another operating surplus in fiscal
2019, which if achieved, would inform any upside considerations.
While S&P recognizes that leverage remains high relative to peers
in the rating category, it believes that the hospital should be
able to improve it over the next couple of years as St. Peter's
does not have any new debt plans in the outlook period.

"The affirmation of the rating reflects our expectation that St.
Peter's will continue to stabilize operating performance after the
largely one-time impacts to operations as a result of its
information technology implementation in fiscal 2017. St. Peter's
solid business position is demographically sound, although it's a
competitive service area, and will continue to provide support to
the current rating," S&P said, adding that St. Peter's unrestricted
reserve levels were steady over the past couple of years, with
days' cash on hand and cash to debt levels in line with rating
expectations.


TANGO TRANSPORT: NLC's Partial Summary Ruling Bid Partly OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Amos L. Mazzant granted in part and denied in part
Defendants Navistar Leasing Company, Navistar Financial
Corporation, and Navistar Leasing Services Corporation's motion for
partial summary judgment in the case captioned CHRISTOPHER MOSER as
Plan Trustee of the Trust Under the Amended Joint Plan of
Liquidation of Tango Transport, LLC, et al., v. NAVISTAR
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-00598
(E.D. Tex.).

In October 2014, Tango Transport, LLC; Tango Logistx, LLC; Gorman
Group, Inc.; Tango Truck Services, LLC; Tango Enterprises, Inc.;
and GMGO, LLC sued Defendants in Louisiana state court. On or about
August 20, 2015, the parties executed a Receipt, Release, and
Settlement of all Claims and Indemnity Agreement ("Settlement
Agreement") settling the Louisiana Litigation.

The Louisiana Litigation involved the alleged sale or lease of
trucks from Defendants -- those who join this motion and those who
do not--to Tango. According to Tango, the trucks sold or leased by
Defendants suffered extraordinary and unacceptable rates of
breakdown caused by design elements of the trucks' MaxxForce
engines. The Defendants to this motion--NLC, NFC, and NLSC--claim
they did not design, manufacture, market, sell, warrant, or repair
the trucks. Instead, NLC claims it was the lessor on truck leases
between NLC and Tango Transport, LLC. NFC states that although it
is a beneficiary on certain guaranties made by the Tango entities,
it did not lease or finance any trucks. NLSC was also a leasing
entity and beneficiary on the guaranties, but claims it had no
contractual relationship with the Tango entities.

In this adversary proceeding, the Trustee seeks to avoid the
Settlement Agreement and to recover Tango's claims, or the value of
the claims.

Defendants move for summary judgment on the following claims: (1)
breach of express warranty; (2) breach of implied warranty of
merchantability; (3) breach of implied covenant of good faith and
fair dealing; (4) negligent misrepresentation; (5) fraudulent
concealment; (6) unjust enrichment; (7) redhibition; (8)
declaratory judgment; and (9) unfair trade practices. The Trustee
only contests summary judgment as to Tango's fraud and consumer
protection claims. Therefore, the Court grants summary judgment on
Tango's (1) breach of express warranty; (2) breach of implied
warranty of merchantability; (3) breach of implied covenant of good
faith and fair dealing; (4) negligent misrepresentation; (5) unjust
enrichment; (6) redhibition; and (7) declaratory judgment claims
against NLC, NFC, and NLSC.

The Trustee contests summary judgment on Tango's fraudulent
concealment and unfair trade practices claims.

Defendants argue the Trustee did not plead the elements of
fraudulent concealment, and even if he did, there is no evidence to
establish the elements under Louisiana law. The Trustee responds
first that Defendants are alter egos of each other. The Trustee
then provides evidence that Defendants fraudulently concealed
information about the defects of trucks containing MaxxForce
engines to induce Tango to enter into leases for the trucks.
Defendants reply that the Trustee's alter ego theory is barred
because the theory is newly asserted.

After careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented
in the pleadings, the Court finds a genuine issue of material fact
as to whether: (1) the Defendants are alter egos of each other and
(2) one or all of the Defendants fraudulently concealed information
from Tango to induce Tango to sign leases. The Court will not bar
the Trustee from arguing an alter ego theory, whether or not
originally alleged in the Louisiana Litigation. As a result, the
Court denies summary judgment on Tango's fraudulent concealment
claim.

Defendants move for summary judgment on Tango's claims against NLC
under the LUTPA. Defendants argue that because Tango premises its
LUTPA claim on the defective-engine allegations, Tango cannot
maintain its claim against NLC as NLC did not design, manufacture,
market, sell, warrant, or repair the Trucks sold and leased to
Tango. After careful consideration of the evidence and arguments
presented in the pleadings, the Court finds genuine issues of
material fact exist as to Tango's LUTPA claim. Accordingly, the
Court denies summary judgment on Tango's unfair trade practices
claim.

In sum, the Court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants
NLC, NFC, and NLSC on Tango's (1) breach of express warranty; (2)
breach of implied warranty of merchantability; (3) breach of
implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (4) negligent
misrepresentation; (5) unjust enrichment; (6) redhibition; and (7)
declaratory judgment claims. The Court denies summary judgment on
Tango's fraudulent concealment and LUTPA claims as to NLC, NFC, and
NLSC.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated Feb. 28,
2019 is available at https://bit.ly/2EgSgou from Leagle.com.

In re Tango Transport, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Keith William
Harvey, The Harvey Law Firm, PC.

Christopher J Moser, as Plan Trustee of the Trust under the Amended
Joint Plan of Liquidation of Tango Transport, LLC, Plaintiff,
represented by Angela J. Somers  -- asomers@rctlegal.com -- Reid
Collins & Tsai LLP, David Benjamin Thomas -- dthomas@rctlegal.com
-- Reid Collins & Tsai, LLP, J. Benjamin King , Reid Collins &
Tsai, LLP & Yonah Jaffe -- yjaffe@rctlegal.com -- Reid Collins &
Tsai LLP.

Navistar International Corporation, Navistar, Inc. & ITA Truck
Sales & Service, LLC, Defendants, represented by James Jay Lee,
Vinson & Elkins LLP, Lance Blake Williams, McCranie Sistrunk
Anzelmo Hardy McDaniel & Welch, LLC, pro hac vice, Angela Nicole
Offerman, Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, Clayton James Callen,
Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer, LLP, Jadd Fitzgerald Masso, Clark
Hill Strasburger, Jeffrey Scott Patterson, Hartline Dacus Barger
Dreyer, LLP, Jordan Elizabeth Jarreau, Hartline Dacus Barger
Dreyer, LLP, Kevin M. Jakopchek, Latham & Watkins LLP, Michael P.
Ridulfo, Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, P. Michael Jung, Clark
Hill Strasburger, Quincy T. Crochet, McCranie Sistrunk Anzelmo
Hardy McDaniel & Welch, LLC, Rebecca Lynn Petereit, Vinson & Elkins
LLP & Robin M. Hulshizer, Latham & Watkins LLP.

Navistar Leasing Company, Navistar Financial Corporation & Navistar
Leasing Services Corporation, Defendants, represented by Michael P.
Ridulfo , Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, Angela Nicole Offerman ,
Kane Russell Coleman & Logan PC, James Jay Lee , Vinson & Elkins
LLP, Jordan Elizabeth Jarreau , Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer, LLP,
Lance Blake Williams , McCranie Sistrunk Anzelmo Hardy McDaniel &
Welch, LLC & Rebecca Lynn Petereit , Vinson & Elkins LLP.

                About Tango Transport LLC

Tango Transport, LLC, provides dry van and flatbed services.  It
offers over-the-road truckload services; and dedicated/private
fleet conversion, expedited, third party logistics, heavy hauling,
and brokerage services. The company also provides logistic
services, including warehouse and distribution, warehouse
management, inventory control, freight payment and audit, and
transportation control services; and reverse logistics solutions.
It serves Fortune 500 companies in the United States. The company
was founded in 1991 and is based in Shreveport, Louisiana.  It
operates a terminal in Shreveport, Louisiana; and facilities in
Sibley, Louisiana; West Memphis, Arkansas; and Madisonville,
Kentucky.

Tango Transport, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-40642) on April 6,
2016.  The petition was signed by B.J. Gorman, president of Gorman
Group, Inc., sole member of the Debtor.  The Debtor is represented
by Keith William Harvey, Esq., at The Harvey Law Firm, P.C.  The
Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and debts of $10
million to $50 million.

On April 26, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Heller Draper Patrick
Horn & Dabney, LLC, serves as counsel while Stillwater Advisory
Group, LLC, serves as financial advisor.

On Dec. 21, 2016, the court confirmed the Debtor's joint plan of
liquidation and the plan trust agreement, which called for the
appointment of Christopher J. Moser as plan trustee.


TMX FINANCE: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'B-' ICR
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on TMX Finance LLC to
positive from negative. At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B-'
issuer credit rating on TMX.

S&P also affirmed its 'B-' issue rating on the company's 11.125%
senior secured notes due 2023. The recovery rating remains
unchanged at '4', indicating its expectation of an average (40%)
recovery in the event of default.

The positive outlook reflects TMX's improved financial performance
and reduced regulatory risk. For year-end 2018, TMX's leverage,
measured as gross debt to adjusted EBITDA, declined to 4.2x from
5.1x in 2017. TMX's leverage benefits from S&P's operating lease
adjustments by about 0.5x because the rating agency adds back $165
million of operating lease liabilities and $59 million of leasing
expenses. TMX generated $166 million of adjusted EBITDA in 2018, up
13% from $147 million in 2017.

The positive outlook over the next 12 months reflects S&P's
expectations that leverage, measured as debt to adjusted EBITDA,
will trend toward 4.0x, EBITDA coverage will stay around 2.5x, and
net charge-offs as a percentage of average receivables will remain
below 35%. The outlook also considers reduced risk related to the
lack of alternative product offerings in Georgia.

"We could raise the ratings over the next 12 months if we expect
leverage to remain below 4.0x, EBITDA coverage to remain above
2.5x, and net charge-offs as a percentage of average receivables to
be below 35% on a sustained basis. An upgrade would also be
contingent upon no regulations impeding the company's operational
performance," S&P said.

"We could revise our outlook to stable over the next 12 months if
TMX's operating performance declines due to the launch of new
products, leverage remains between 4.0x-5.0x, or EBITDA coverage
falls below 2.0x on a sustained basis," the rating agency said,
adding that it could also revise its outlook if any regulations
impede the company's growth strategy or if net charge-offs to
average receivables rise above 35% on a sustained basis.


TOLL BROTHERS: S&P Alters Outlook to Positive, Affirms 'BB+' ICR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on U.S. homebuilder Toll
Brothers Inc. to positive from stable and affirmed its 'BB+'
ratings on the company and its senior unsecured debt.

"We revised our outlook on Toll Brothers Inc. to positive based on
its continued deleveraging amid the long and steady upswing in the
U.S. housing market. We believe that the company's solid
profitability and cash flow this late in the housing cycle could
enable it to preserve credit measures that are commensurate with an
investment-grade rating even when the housing cycle inevitably
turns," S&P said. "In addition to its attractive earnings-based
credit ratios and countercyclical cash flows, Toll Brothers' asset
coverage is good, its maturities are well staggered, and its
borrowings are substantially unsecured."

The positive outlook on Toll Brothers reflects S&P's expectation
that the company will maintain its currently solid credit ratios
even if the housing markets and the company's earnings weaken
moderately.

"We could raise our rating on Toll Brothers to investment grade in
the next year or two if the company maintains adjusted debt
leverage in the 2x-3x range and a debt-to-capital ratio in the
35%-45% range and we expect that it would sustain these metrics
through most of the U.S. housing cycle," S&P said, adding that it
would expect the company's discretionary cash flow to remain
neutral or positive (after all shareholder returns) amid steady to
potentially softer market conditions over the next few years, which
would provide it with a buffer to support the investment-grade
rating.

"Although we believe the company's customer base is resilient to a
slowdown in the broader housing market or an unexpected rise in
mortgage rates, Toll Brothers' pricing, organic revenue, and
earnings growth may be sluggish over the next few years, which
would necessitate that it maintain steady debt levels to preserve
its currently attractive credit ratios," the rating agency said.

S&P said it could revise its outlook on Toll Brothers to stable if
it believes that the company's debt to EBITDA will increase above
3x and the company's debt-to-capital ratio will rise above 45%
because of any combination of weaker earnings, large land
investments, or shareholder returns.

"This could occur if weaker pricing for the company's products and
more-expensive land costs roll off such that our projected 2019 and
2020 gross margins decline by more than 300 basis points (bps).
More likely, however, is that some debt-funded initiative precedes
a moderate drop in earnings, leaving the company with poor
prospects to maintain credit ratios commensurate with an
investment-grade rating," S&P said. "For example, we estimate that
the company could return $1 billion to its shareholders through
2020 before hitting our thresholds, though this would likely
eliminate its cushion in case of weaker earnings."


U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS WAPA: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Revenue Bond Rating
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew its 'CCC+' senior-lien bond rating and
'CCC' subordinate-lien underlying rating (SPUR) on U.S. Virgin
Islands Water & Power Authority's electric system revenue bonds
outstanding. The rating was suspended Nov. 15, 2018.

"We are taking this action because we have not been provided with
timely information of satisfactory quality to maintain the rating
on the securities in accordance with our applicable criteria and
policies. The withdrawal of this rating was preceded, in accordance
with our policies, by any change to the rating we consider
appropriate given available information," S&P said.


ULTRA PETROLEUM: Fitch Lowers Issuer Default Rating to 'CCC+'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded Ultra Petroleum Corp. and Ultra
Resources, Inc.'s (together Ultra) Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDRs) to 'CCC+' from 'B-'. Fitch also downgraded Ultra Resource's
secured revolver and term loan to 'B+'/'RR1' from 'BB-'/'RR1',
senior secured second lien notes to 'B'/'RR2' from 'B+'/'RR2', and
senior unsecured notes to 'CCC-'/'RR6' from 'CCC'/'RR6'. The IDRs
and senior unsecured notes were placed on Ratings Watch Negative.

The downgrade reflects the reduction to 2019 production estimates
since Fitch's last rating action, high leverage metrics, and
minimal asset coverage. In addition, although the debt exchanges
are favorable in reducing overall debt, Fitch notes that the use of
second and third lien exchanges reflects the company's reduced
financial flexibility. Production is expected to decline over the
next three years, which will make it challenging for Ultra to
generate material free cash flow to help further reduce debt absent
higher prices. Differentials remain wide to Henry Hub pricing,
except for a brief period during winter 2018/2019, which was caused
by a one-time disruption. These challenges are offset by Ultra's
low operating and drilling cost structure, the belief that the
company can remain relatively free cash flow neutral in the near
term, and the potential for further reductions in debt from future
exchanges.

The Ratings Watch Negative reflects the potential of a negative
rating action if Fitch were to determine that the contemplated debt
exchange of senior unsecured notes into new senior secured third
lien notes is a distressed debt exchange.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Weaker Expected Credit Metrics: Since Fitch's last rating action in
January 2019, we anticipate 2019 EBITDA to decline to the $400
million range from the mid-$400 million range due to increased
differentials and weaker production volumes. Management is
attempting to maintain capital spending in line with operating cash
flow, but further reductions in capital spending could result in
further production cuts. Fitch is now expecting debt/EBITDA to
range in the 4.5x-5.0x range (assuming no proceeds from the
make-whole litigation), which is consistent with a 'CCC' category
rating.

Tightening Liquidity: Fitch views the near-term liquidity as
adequate; however, liquidity is expected to tighten throughout the
year. According to the credit agreement, Ultra's net leverage ratio
cannot exceed 4.75x through June 2019 and 4.9x beginning Sept. 30,
2019, through June 2020. In addition, for each $50 million
increments of cash received from the make-whole settlement, the
ratio is reduced by 0.1x. Fitch estimates that Ultra is at risk of
breaching this covenant in late-2019 and through 2020. Fitch would
expect Ultra to engage in discussions with its lenders and consider
asset monetization to bolster near-term liquidity position as
needed.

Debt Exchanges: On May 9, 2019, Ultra commenced an exchange offer
of up to $225 million of its 7.125% senior noted due 2025 for 9%
cash / 2.5% PIK senior secured third lien notes due 2024. Assuming
the maximum exchange amount is issued ($90 million) at the early
participation debt, approximately $171 million aggregate principal
amount of the 2025 notes outstanding would be exchanged, resulting
in approximately $54 million aggregate principal amount remaining
outstanding, and a net reduction of debt of approximately $81
million. According to its credit agreement, Ultra has $240 million
of third lien capacity including the $90 million to be used in the
contemplated exchange.

In December 2018, Ultra completed a debt exchange of $780 million
senior notes into $545 million or 9% cash / 2% PIK senior secured
second lien notes due July 2024 and 10.9 million of new warrants.
The exchange reduced gross debt by $235 million and cash interest
by $14 million and reduced the amount outstanding on the next major
bond maturity (2022) to $195 million from $700 million. In 1Q19, an
additional $44.6 million of the 2022 notes were exchanged for $27
million of the second lien notes. Despite the actual and projected
reductions in overall debt from the debt exchanges, leverage ratios
are expected to increase because of the decline in EBITDA.

Large Negative Basis Differentials: Basis differentials have
widened in 2018 and 2019 from a combination of weaker demand in
California and increasing competition from the Permian, the
Marcellus, and Canada. Except for a period from mid-November 2018
to mid-March 2019 when weather-related demands and supply
constraints in markets supplied by Rockies natural gas, natural gas
sold at Ultra's delivery point (Opal) typically trades at a
discount to the Henry Hub. Following that disruption, the discount
has widened to $0.50-$0.70 and combined with the decline in Henry
Hub pricing, it implies that Opal natural gas is selling at around
$2.00. Fitch estimates that Ultra has hedged the basis differential
on approximately 50% of the expected production for the remainder
of 2019 at approximately $0.58/MMBTU. Fitch expects differentials
to remain under pressure at least through 2019 when incremental
pipeline capacity is expected to diversify gas flows away from
California. Fitch forecasts differentials in the $0.70 per Mcf
range for 2019 with slight improvement likely in the outer years.

Hedging Policy Reduces Risk: In accordance with the terms of its
amended credit agreement, Ultra aims to maintain a rolling hedge
program of at least 65% of the next 18 months of production,
helping to protect a minimum level of cash flow needed to maintain
drilling activity levels. The company had entered into NYMEX
natural gas swaps for approximately 80% of its expected natural gas
production for the remainder of 2019 at an average price of $2.83
per Mcf. Fitch expects Ultra to opportunistically expand the size
and length of its hedging program. The hedges provide modest margin
uplift to Fitch's base case but significant protection under
Fitch's stressed scenario (where 2019 prices drop to $2.25 per
Mcf).

Proven Vertical Resources and Cost Structure: Ultra has a
contiguous position in the Pinedale Field with about 78,000 net
acres supportive of over 4,000 gross drilling locations. However,
only 800 locations are estimated to be economic at the current low
commodity prices and wide differentials. This represents about
eight years of reserve life at current production levels. While the
performance of the horizontal wells has been uneven, Ultra has an
established track record of successful vertical exploitation of its
acreage with a competitive cost structure. EBITDA cash costs of
about $1.00 per Mcfe in 2018 allows for favorable netbacks even at
the currently unfavorable commodity prices and locational basis.
Ultra's acreage is essentially 100% held by production, providing
the company significant flexibility in the timing of the capital
deployment and drilling activity.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Ultra's ratings reflect the company's dry-gas production profile
and focus on one play, the Pinedale region. It has competitive
operating expenses that should provide profitable natural gas
opportunities, but wider differentials and the prevailing low
natural gas price environment are near-term concerns. Ultra's
production size (115 mboe/d in 1Q19) are consistent with 'B+' peers
such as SM Energy (119 mboe/d) and Extraction Oil & Gas (80 mboe/d)
and well above 'B-' issuers, including Comstock Resources (70
mboe/d), which is primarily a natural gas producer like Ultra.
Ultra has also a large reserve base (510 mmboe) relative to its
peers, with 77% of its reserves developed. Although its leverage
metrics compare in line with its peer group with among the lowest
debt/flowing production and low debt/proved reserves versus its
peer group (SM, Extraction, Unit, Lonestar, Comstock), Ultra's
declining production profile may make it weaker over time. In
addition, Ultra has one of the lowest netbacks of its peers given
its concentration to natural gas and the higher differentials due
to location issues.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

-- Base case Henry Hub natural gas at $3.25 in 2019 and a
long-term price of $3.00;

-- Base case WTI oil price of $57.50 in 2019 and 2020 and a
long-term price of $55.00;

-- Basis differential of $0.70-$0.75 per Mcf and 7% uplift from
NGLs through the forecast period;

-- Production of approximately 672 Bcfe/d in 2019 (down 11%) and
low, single-digit declines in later years;

-- Capex of $335 million in 2019, decreasing to $250 million in
later years;

-- Cash costs of about $1.00-$1.15 per Mcfe during the forecast
period.

Fitch's recovery analysis for Ultra Petroleum uses both an asset
value-based approach on observed transactions of like assets and a
going-concern (GC) approach, with the following assumptions:

Transactional and asset-based valuation such as recent transactions
for the Pinedale basin on a $/acre, SEC PV-10, flowing production,
and proved reserve estimates were used to determine a reasonable
sales price for the company's assets. The valuations were further
adjusted to reflect the scale, location, and asset quality. The
valuations resulted in an average of $1,882 million, which
primarily wider differentials and lack of transactions in the
Pinedale.

Assumptions for the going-concern approach include:

-- Fitch assumed a bankruptcy scenario exit EBITDA of $321 million
and reflects the estimated stress case 2021 scenario, which assumes
a prolonged commodity price decline with a slight recovery in
2021.

-- GC enterprise value (EV) multiple of 6.25x versus a historical
E&P sub-sector multiple of 5.8x. The multiple is slightly lower
than other natural gas-oriented bankruptcies of 6.7x-6.9x (Atlas
Resources, Sabine Oil & Gas, SandRidge Energy) that went through
prolonged commodity price decline. The multiple also reflects the
pricing discount of natural gas from the Pinedale field to Henry
Hub and the expectation that improved pricing over time as
additional pipeline capacity is added in the Permian Basin. The
going concern enterprise value of the company is $2,006 million.

The GC enterprise value is used because it is higher than the
liquidation value. After administrative claims of 10%, there is
$1,806 million available to creditors. The first lien revolving
credit facility is assumed 80% drawn as a commodity downturn would
likely result in a lower borrowing base and reduced commitments.
The first lien revolver and term loan are fully covered and
expected to receive a Recovery Rating of 'RR1'. The second lien
notes receive a Recovery Rating of 'RR2' and the senior unsecured
notes receive a Recovery Rating of a 'RR6'.


UTZ QUALITY: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-' on Weak Performance
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered all of its ratings on U.S.-based Utz
Quality Foods LLC, including the issuer credit rating, to 'B-' from
'B', the senior secured first-lien term loan rating, to 'B-' from
'B', and the senior secured second-lien term loan rating, to 'CCC'
from 'CCC+'.  

The downgrade reflects the company's underperformance in 2018 and
challenge UTZ is facing in turning around Inventure's top-line and
the consolidated company's EBITDA amid mixed demand for its
products amongst top customers and elevated commodity and freight
costs. This will likely constrain any meaningful leverage
improvement. As a result, S&P expects adjusted debt to EBITDA to
exceed 7.5x over the next year compared to its prior expectation of
between 5x and 6x.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation the company will curb
revenue declines and begin seeing sequential quarterly improvements
beginning in the second half of 2019 as investments in turning
around Inventure begin to generate better performance and more
discretionary cash flow. The stable outlook also reflects the
rating agency's expectation that adjusted leverage will remain
between 7x and 8x as modest declines in EBITDA will be offset by
required and discretionary debt repayment.

"We could lower our rating on Utz if operating performance
continues to deteriorate because it is unable to stabilize
Inventure by the second half of the year, or because the company
sees further losses of market share that would, in turn, keep
discretionary cash flow negative and pressure debt service," S&P
said. Specifically, the rating agency would lower the rating if the
company sustains negative discretionary cash flow in fiscal 2019
and into the next year while EBITDA interest coverage erodes to
less than 1.5x.

"We could raise our rating on Utz if it can curb top-line declines,
improve EBITDA margins, reduce leverage to comfortably less than
7.0x, and begins generating discretionary cash flow in excess of
$10 million," S&P said.


VALVOLINE INC: S&P Cuts ICR to 'BB' on Weak Operating Performance
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on U.S.-based
Valvoline Inc. to 'BB' from 'BB+' and its issue-level rating on the
senior unsecured notes to 'BB' from 'BB+'.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BBB-' issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured bank credit facilities. The recovery
ratings remain '1' for the senior secured bank credit facilities
and '4' for the unsecured notes.

The downgrade reflects S&P's forecast for continued weak operating
performance, particularly in Valvoline's Core North America
business, offset by good momentum in the company's Quick Lubes
business, and the rating agency's expectation that adjusted debt to
EBITDA will remain above 3x.

The stable outlook reflects S&P's expectation that Valvoline Inc.
will maintain leverage in the low- to mid-3x area, and continue to
modestly grow revenue and profit, driven by continued momentum in
its Quick Lube business while working to stabilize its Core North
America business.

"We could lower the ratings over the next year if operating
performance and margins decline considerably, leading to weaker
profitability and cash flows, resulting in adjusted debt to EBITDA
sustained above 4x," S&P said, adding that this could occur from
further weakening of the Core North America segment, lower demand
for the company's lubricant products, fewer vehicle miles driven,
intensifying competition from larger players, or greater sales of
electric vehicles than the rating agency expects. S&P further said
that it could also lower the ratings if the company's financial
policy in respect to shareholder returns becomes more aggressive,
such that leverage is sustained above 4x.

"Although unlikely within the next 12 months, we could raise the
ratings if we have a more favorable view of the business. This
could happen if the company significantly expands, while
diversifying its product offerings, geographic exposure, and
customer base," S&P said. A higher rating is also predicated on a
more conservative financial policy in respect to shareholder
returns and a demonstration of a commitment to sustain debt to
EBITDA below 3x, according to the rating agency.


WEST CORP: S&P Cuts ICR to B- on Weaker-Than-Expected Performance
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered all of its ratings on Omaha, Neb.-based
global conferencing provider West Corp. by one notch, including its
issuer credit rating, to 'B-' from 'B' based on its expectation
that S&P-adjusted leverage will remain elevated at about 7x over
the next year. The outlook is stable.

The downgrade reflects steep revenue declines in West Corp's legacy
audio conferencing and collaboration business driven by secular
industry pressures, intense competition from lower-priced services,
reduced demand from customer insourcing, and declining call
volumes, according to S&P. As a result of these factors, and the
company's overall business prospects relative to peers in the
business and consumer services industry, S&P revised its assessment
of West Corp's business risk to weak from fair. Further, the rating
agency expects adjusted debt to EBITDA to remain elevated at about
7x over the next year.

The stable outlook reflects the rating agency's expectation that
S&P-adjusted leverage will remain around 7x over the next year
despite top line pressure from weaker operating trends in the
company's conferencing and collaboration business.

"We could lower our rating on West Corp. if its operating
performance were materially weaker than we expected because of
accelerating revenue declines from customer losses or execution
missteps from acquisition integrations, which led to a sharp
decline in its FOCF and weaker liquidity," S&P said, adding that it
could also lower the rating if the company made a large
debt-financed acquisition or distribution to shareholders or the
company's financial commitments appeared unsustainable over the
long term.

"We could raise the ratings if the company replaced lost
conferencing and collaboration business with revenue from
profitable new business such that its total revenue consistently
increased and it sustained margins in the high 20% area while
correspondingly reducing its leverage below 6.5x," S&P said. "Given
its private-equity ownership, an upgrade would require West Corp's
financial sponsor owners to maintain a financial policy that keeps
leverage comfortably below 6.5x on a sustained basis."


WHITING PETROLEUM: S&P Affirms 'BB' ICR; Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB' issuer credit rating on
Whiting Petroleum Corp., a Denver-based crude oil and natural gas
exploration and production (E&P) company.

S&P also affirmed its 'BBB-' issue-level rating on the company's
senior secured debt. The recovery rating remains '1', indicating
the rating agency's expectation for very high (90%-100%: rounded
estimate: 95%) recovery of principal in the event of a payment
default.  At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'BB' issue-level
rating on the company's senior unsecured debt and revised its
recovery rating to '4' from '3' as a result of the company's lower
proved reserves value following a 16% decline in proved reserve
volumes in 2018. The '4' recovery rating indicates S&P's
expectation for average (30%-50%: rounded estimate: 30%) recovery
of principal in the event of a payment default.

"The affirmation reflects our expectation that Whiting will
continue to operate with a disciplined capital approach to generate
positive free operating cash flow (FOCF) while organically growing
production and reserves from its Williston Basin assets and
maintaining leverage ratios at a level appropriate for the rating
over the next two years," S&P said, adding that it expects the
company will seek to address its upcoming debt maturities later in
2019, using free cash flow and partial refinancing. The rating
agency estimates Whiting will maintain average funds from
operations (FFO)-to-debt of about 40% over the next two years.

S&P said the stable outlook reflects its expectation that Whiting
will maintain a modest financial policy, simultaneously growing
production and generating free cash flow, over the next 12 to 18
months. As a result, FFO/debt should average around 40% over this
period, assuming average West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil
prices of $55/bbl in both 2019 and 2020, according to S&P. The
rating agency also expects the company to begin to address its
upcoming debt maturities in the second half of 2019.

"We could lower the rating if FFO/debt fell and remained below 30%
for a sustained period, which we believe would most likely occur if
production falls significantly short of our current projections and
oil prices or differentials deteriorate below our current
assumptions. We could also consider lowering the rating if Whiting
is unable to address its 2020 and 2021 debt maturities in a timely
manner," S&P said.

"We could raise the rating if Whiting increases its scale or asset
diversification to levels commensurate with higher rated peers,
while maintaining FFO/debt above 45%," S&P said, adding that this
would most likely occur if the company increases production and
reserves through a combination of organic drilling and bolt-on
acquisitions while continuing to generate cash flow in excess of
capital spending.


YAK ACCESS: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative, Affirms 'B' ICR
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Yak Access LLC to
negative from stable and affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating.

At the same time, S&P affirmed its 'B' issue-level rating on the
company's first-lien term loan and its 'CCC+' issue-level rating on
its second-lien term loan.

S&P's negative outlook on Yak reflects the company's
weaker-than-expected profitability over the past several quarters,
which has increased its leverage beyond the rating agency's
previous forecast. The company's S&P-adjusted EBITDA declined in
2018 due largely to a delayed regulatory approval at one
significant project and an unfavorable product mix, as a large
customer purchased mats from Yak instead of renting them. The
company's S&P-adjusted debt to EBITDA was 5.3x as of Dec. 31, 2018,
which is significantly higher than S&P's previous expectation of
3.5x. The rating agency expects the company to reduce its
S&P-adjusted leverage to the 4x-5x range by the end of 2019, mainly
by improving its profitability and EBITDA.

S&P's negative outlook on Yak reflects the company's increased
financial leverage over the past few quarters and the risk that
further project delays could pressure its utilization rates and
cash flow generation. Still, the rating agency expects the
company's S&P-adjusted debt to EBITDA to improve to between 4x and
5x in 2019.

"We could lower our ratings on Yak Access during the next 12 months
if its free cash flow generation turns meaningfully negative and
pressures its liquidity. This could occur, for example, because of
delays in project start dates or higher-than-anticipated levels of
mat purchases," S&P said. "We could also downgrade the company if
we expect its S&P-adjusted leverage to exceed 6x over the next 12
months."

The rating agency said it could revise its outlook on Yak Access to
stable if the company generates neutral to positive free operating
cash flow over the next 12 months and its S&P-adjusted leverage
improves below 5x.


YUMA ENERGY: Reports $16 Million Net Loss for First Quarter
-----------------------------------------------------------
Yuma Energy, Inc. filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 20, 2019, its quarterly report on Form 10-Q
reporting a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $16.04
million on $3.97 million of revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2019, compared to a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $3.53 million on $5.64 million of revenues for the
three months ended March 31, 2018.

As of March 31, 2019, Yuma Energy had $66.53 million in total
assets, $45.84 million in total current liabilities, $14.68 million
in total other noncurrent liabilities, and $5.99 million in total
stockholders' equity.

                  Liquidity and Going Concern

Yuma Energy said certain factors and uncertainties, as well as
other factors which include, but are not limited to, declines in
the Company's production, the Company's failure to establish
commercial production on its Permian properties, no available
capital to maintain and develop its properties, and its substantial
working capital deficit of approximately $40 million, raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern for the twelve months following the issuance of these
financial statements.  The consolidated financial statements have
been prepared on a going concern basis of accounting, which
contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and
satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of
business.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of the going concern
uncertainty.

On Oct. 26, 2016, the Company and three of its subsidiaries, as the
co-borrowers, entered into a credit agreement providing for a $75.0
million three-year senior secured revolving credit facility with
Societe Generale, as administrative agent, SG Americas Securities,
LLC, as lead arranger and bookrunner, and the lenders.

The credit facility was $34.0 million as of March 31, 2019, and the
Company was, and is, fully drawn, leaving no availability on the
line of credit.  All of the obligations under the Credit Agreement,
and the guarantees of those obligations, are secured by
substantially all of the Company's assets.

The Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that, among
other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the
Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness, create liens on
assets, make investments, enter into sale and leaseback
transactions, pay dividends and distributions or repurchase its
capital stock, engage in mergers or consolidations, sell certain
assets, sell or discount any notes receivable or accounts
receivable, and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

The Credit Agreement contains customary financial and affirmative
covenants and defines events of default for credit facilities of
this type, including failure to pay principal or interest, breach
of covenants, breach of representations and warranties, insolvency,
judgment default, and a change of control.  Upon the occurrence and
continuance of an event of default, the Lender has the right to
accelerate repayment of the loans and exercise its remedies with
respect to the collateral.

The Company is not in compliance under the credit facility with its
(i) total debt to EBITDAX covenant for the trailing four quarter
period, (ii) current ratio covenant, (iii) EBITDAX to interest
expense covenant for the trailing four quarter period, (iv) the
liquidity covenant requiring the Company to maintain unrestricted
cash and borrowing base availability of at least $4.0 million, and
(v) obligation to make interest only payments. The Company
currently is not making any payments of interest under the credit
facility and anticipates future non-compliance under the credit
facility for the foreseeable future until the Company effects a
restructuring of its debt obligations.  Due to this non-compliance,
as well as the credit facility maturity in 2019, the Company
classified its entire bank debt as a current liability in its
financial statements as of March 31, 2019.  On Oct. 9, 2018, the
Company received a notice and reservation of rights from the
administrative agent under the Credit Agreement advising that an
event of default had occurred and continues to exist by reason of
the Company's noncompliance with the liquidity covenant requiring
us to maintain cash and cash equivalents and borrowing base
availability of at least $4.0 million.  As a result of the default,
the Lender may accelerate the outstanding balance under the Credit
Agreement, increase the applicable interest rate by 2.0% per annum
or commence foreclosure on the collateral securing the loans.  As
of May 20, 2019, the Lender has not accelerated the outstanding
amount due and payable on the loans, increased the applicable
interest rate or commenced foreclosure proceedings, but may
exercise one or more of these remedies in the future.  As required
under the Credit Agreement, the Company previously entered into
hedging arrangements with SocGen and BP Energy Company pursuant to
International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements.

On March 14, 2019, the Company received a notice of an event of
default under its ISDA Agreement with SocGen.  Due to the default
under the ISDA Agreement, SocGen unwound all of the Company's
hedges with them.  The notice provides for a payment of
approximately $347,129 to settle the Company's outstanding
obligations thereunder related to SocGen's hedges, which is
included in accounts payable at March 31, 2019.  On March 19, 2019,
the Company received a notice of an event of default under its ISDA
Agreement with BP.  Due to the default under the ISDA Agreement, BP
also unwound all of the Company's hedges with them. The notice
provides for a payment of approximately $775,725 to settle the
Company's outstanding obligations thereunder related to BP's
hedges, which is included in accounts payable at
March 31, 2019.

During the first quarter of 2019, the Company agreed to sell its
Kern County, California properties, and closed on the sale in April
2019 for net proceeds of approximately $1.8 million.  As additional
consideration for the sale of the assets, if WTI Index for oil
equals or exceeds $65 in the six months following closing and
maintains that average for twelve consecutive months then the buyer
agreed to pay the Company an additional $250,000.  Net proceeds of
approximately $1.2 million were used for the repayment of
borrowings under the credit facility, and approximately $600,000
was retained by the Company for working capital purposes.

The Company has initiated several strategic alternatives to
mitigate its limited liquidity (defined as cash on hand and undrawn
borrowing base), its financial covenant compliance issues, and to
provide it with additional working capital to develop its existing
assets.

On Oct. 22, 2018, the Company retained Seaport Global Securities
LLC, an investment banking firm, to advise the Company on its
strategic and tactical alternatives, including possible
acquisitions and divestitures.  On March 1, 2019, the Company hired
a chief restructuring officer, and subsequently on
March 28, 2019, appointed that person as interim chief executive
officer.

The Company continues to reduce its operating and general and
administrative costs, and has curtailed its planned 2019 capital
expenditures.

"The Company plans to take further steps to mitigate its limited
liquidity, which may include, but are not limited to, restructuring
its existing debt; selling additional assets; further reducing
general and administrative expenses; seeking merger and acquisition
related opportunities; and potentially raising proceeds from
capital markets transactions, including the sale of debt or equity
securities.  There can be no assurance that the exploration of
strategic alternatives will result in a transaction or otherwise
improve the Company's limited liquidity and that the Company will
continue as a going concern," Yuma said.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/7KlWgk

                       About Yuma Energy

Yuma Energy, Inc. -- http://www.yumaenergyinc.com/-- is an
independent Houston-based exploration and production company
focused on acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources.  Historically, the
Company's activities have focused on inland and onshore properties,
primarily located in central and southern Louisiana and
southeastern Texas.  Its common stock is listed on the NYSE
American under the trading symbol "YUMA."

Yuma Energy reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $17.07 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, compared to a
net loss attributable to common stockholders of $6.80 million for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017.  As of Dec. 31, 2018, Yuma Energy had
$77.36 million in total assets, $44.15 million in total current
liabilities, $11.43 million in total other noncurrent liabilities,
and $21.77 million in total equity.

                  Going Concern Uncertainty

Moss Adams LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's auditor since
2017, issued a "going concern" qualification in its report dated
April 2, 2019, on the Company's consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2018, citing that the Company is in
default on its credit facility, has a substantial working capital
deficit, no available capital to maintain or develop its properties
and all hedging agreements have been terminated by counterparties.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.


ZILLOW GROUP: Court Denies Bid to Dismiss Securities Suit
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case, In re Zillow Group, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case
No. C17-1387-JCC (W.D. Wash.), Judge John C. Coughenour of the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle,
denied the Defendants' motion to dismiss.

The Plaintiffs filed the putative class action against Zillow on
behalf of purchasers of Zillow securities, alleging violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
violation of the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5.
The Plaintiffs also name as Defendants, Spencer Rascoff and
Kathleen Phillips, who were Zillow's CEO and CFO/Chief Legal
Officer respectively, during the relevant class period.

The thrust of the Plaintiffs' claims is that Zillow's "co-marketing
program" was designed to allow participating real estate agents to
refer mortgage business to participating lenders in violation of
Section 8(a) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
("RESPA").  They assert that the Defendants made a series of
misleading statements regarding Zillow's legal compliance by
failing to disclose the co-marketing program's alleged illegality,
particularly after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
("CFPB") launched an investigation into the program.  The
Plaintiffs allege that Defendants' misrepresentations about
Zillow's legal compliance caused them to purchase the company's
stock at artificially inflated prices.

The Defendants moved to dismiss the Plaintiffs' consolidated
amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted.  On Oct. 2, 2018, the Court granted the Defendants'
motion, and dismissed the Plaintiffs' Exchange Act claims without
prejudice and with leave to amend.

On Nov. 16, 2018, the Plaintiffs timely filed their second amended
complaint.  They again allege that the co-marketing program was
designed to violate RESPA and the Defendants made false statements
regarding Zillow's legal compliance.  They also allege, for the
first time, that the Defendants violated the Consumer Financial
Protection Act ("CFPA") by providing "substantial assistance" to
co-marketing participants who were violating RESPA.  The Plaintiffs
assert that these alleged CFPA violations provide a separate basis
for the Court to conclude that the Defendants made misleading
statements.

On Dec. 17, 2018, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the
second amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted.  They assert that the Plaintiffs have failed
to correct the deficiencies identified by the Court in its prior
order dismissing the amended complaint—specifically, that the
Plaintiffs have failed to allege particularized facts demonstrating
that Zillow designed its business to violate the law, encouraged
third parties to violate the law, made false or misleading
statements about the Company's compliance with the law, and caused
the losses alleged.

Before Judge Coughenour can analyze the statements that the
Plaintiffs allege were materially misleading, he must first assess
the Plaintiffs' allegations regarding Zillow's RESPA and CFPA
violations.  If the second amended complaint lacks particularized
facts regarding these alleged violations, then many of the
Defendants' statements could neither have been misleading nor made
with the requisite scienter.

Among other things, the Judge finds that taken togerther, the
allegations contained in the second amended complaint allow him to
draw a reasonable inference that the co-marketing program allowed
lenders to pay more than fair market value for the advertising
Zillow provided in return.  The foregoing allegations also satisfy
the Court's prior order that the Plaintiffs assert particularized
facts that demonstrate that Zillow designed the co-marketing
program to violate RESPA, and that Zillow was instructing and
encouraging third-parties to commit such violations.

The Court has held that the second amended complaint plausibly
alleges that Zillow violated RESPA by designing the co-marketing
program to allow agents to illegally refer mortgage business to
lenders in exchange for paying advertising costs, by encouraging
such referrals, and by allowing lenders to pay above fair market
value for the advertising they received in return.  Considering
that ruling -- and the fact that this is not a CFPB enforcement
action, but a private securities action -- the Judge rejects the
Plaintiffs' CFPA theory of liability, to the extent such alleged
violations would establish that Defendants made material misleading
statements in support of the Plaintiffs' Exchange Act Claims.

The Judge also finds that unlike the allegations contain in the
amended complaint, the Plaintiffs have now alleged particularized
facts demonstrating that Zillow designed the co-marketing program
in a way that violated RESPA and that such violations were
occurring.  Therefore, the Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that
the Defendants' statements regarding Zillow's legal compliance were
materially misleading.

The Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that Phillips' statement in
2017 that Zillow believed it had put the co-marketing program
together in a way that enabled agents and lenders to participate in
full compliance with the law, was materially misleading for
omitting that Zillow had altered the program.  They have plausibly
alleged that Phillips' statements made in February 2017 and May
2017 regarding Zillow's legal compliance were materially
misleading.  As with Phillips' statements, the second amended
complaint plausibly alleges that Rascoff's statements in May 2017
were materially misleading.
Finally, the Judge finds that the Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged
a Section 10(b) violation against Zillow.  The second amended
complaint contains sufficient allegations regarding Rascoff and
Phillips' corporate positions to demonstrate that they exercised
actual power or control over Zillow.  Therefore, the Plaintiffs
have plausibly alleged a violation of Section 20(a) against Rascoff
and Phillips.

For the foregoing reasons, Judge Coughenour denied the Defendants'
motion to dismiss.

A full-text copy of the Court's April 19, 2019 Order is available
at https://bit.ly/2VHOiQs from Leagle.com.

James Shotwell, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated, Plaintiff, represented by Clifford A. Cantor --
cliff.cantor@outlook.com.

Jo Ann Offutt, Raymond Harris & Johanna Choy, Plaintiffs,
represented by Jonathan Stern -- jstern@rosenlegal.com -- THE ROSEN
LAW FIRM, PA, pro hac vice, Laurence M. Rosen --
lrosen@rosenlegal.com -- THE ROSEN LAW FIRM PA, pro hac vice, Colin
M. George -- cgeorge@hallgeorge.com -- HALL & GEORGE PLLC & Spencer
Hall, Jr., HALL & GEORGE PLLC.

Stephen Vargosko, Individually and on behalf of all othes similarly
situated, Consol Plaintiff, represented by Jonathan Stern, THE
ROSEN LAW FIRM, PA, pro hac vice, Laurence M. Rosen, THE ROSEN LAW
FIRM PA, pro hac vice & Colin M. George, HALL & GEORGE PLLC.

Zillow Group, Inc, Spencer M. Rascoff & Kathleen Philips,
Defendants, represented by Alexander Mircheff --
amircheff@gibsondunn.com -- GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP, pro hac
vice, Meryl L. Young -- myoung@gibsondunn.com -- GIBSON DUNN &
CRUTCHER, pro hac vice, Sean C. Knowles -- SKnowles@perkinscoie.com
-- PERKINS COIE & Ronald L. Berenstain --
RBerenstain@perkinscoie.com -- PERKINS COIE.



[*] Howard Steel Joins Goodwin's Financial Restructuring Practice
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Global law firm Goodwin on May 20, 2019, disclosed that Howard
Steel has joined its Financial Restructuring practice as a partner
in the New York office.  Steel's arrival comes on the heels of the
firm's West Coast expansion of the practice with the recent
addition of partner Nathan Schultz in San Francisco.

Steel represents creditors' committees, bondholders, lenders,
indenture trustees, landlords, and individual secured and unsecured
creditors in all aspects of corporate restructuring.  He has
extensive experience in SIPA proceedings, mass tort cases and
distressed debt trading.  Steel's experience extends across
industries, including automotive, coal, healthcare,
pharmaceuticals, financial services, gaming, real estate and
retail.

"Howard is a talented lawyer with comprehensive restructuring
experience and a prowess for litigating and negotiating complex
matters," said Bill Weintraub, co-chair of Goodwin's Financial
Restructuring practice.  "He will be a terrific addition to our
team and we look forward to working with him, and Nathan, as we
continue expanding the practice on a national scale."

Steel holds a J.D. from Columbia University and is admitted to
practice in New York.

He has been consistently recognized as a leading restructuring
lawyer and has garnered praise from industry rankings and awards,
including Benchmark Litigation's "Under 40 Hot List," Global
Restructuring Review's "40 Under 40," and Super Lawyers "Rising
Stars."

Steel can be reached at HSteel@goodwinlaw.com and 212.459.7412.

Goodwin's Financial Restructuring practice provides trusted
guidance in the restructuring of highly leveraged and distressed
businesses, real estate assets and asset portfolios for clients in
the United States and abroad.  The team implements transactional
solutions and litigation strategies that produce creative,
successful reorganizations both within and outside of formal
bankruptcy or insolvency cases.  For debtors, the team anticipates
critical issues and devises value maximizing strategies to identify
and address financial challenges before they become crises.  The
team also has a highly successful track record representing
creditors, including sophisticated distressed debt investors, hedge
funds, asset purchasers and plan sponsors. Earlier this year,
Goodwin was ranked as a National Tier One Firm for Bankruptcy and
Creditor's Rights/Insolvency and Reorganization Law by U.S. News
and World Report/Best Lawyers.  The firm is also recognized for
excellence in bankruptcy and restructuring in Chambers USA.

                          About Goodwin

Goodwin's 1,000-plus lawyers across the United States, Europe and
Asia excel at complex transactions, high-stakes litigation and
world-class advisory services in the technology, life sciences,
real estate, private equity, and financial industries.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2019.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***