/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/181015.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, October 15, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 287

                            Headlines

1 GLOBAL: Committee Taps Stichter Riedel as Legal Counsel
1ST HOSPITALITY: Taps Stinson Leonard as Legal Counsel
2500 WEST LOOP: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
A-1 INTERNATIONAL: Seeks Authority to Use TD Bank Cash Collateral
ABE'S BOAT: Court Aligns Exclusive Period With Plan Filing Deadline

ACADEMIES OF MATH: S&P Alters Revenue Bond Outlook to Negative
ADVANTAGE ENERGY: Trustee Selling All Assets to RW Bayfront
ADVANTAGE SALES: $1.80BB Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off
ADVANTAGE SALES: $225MM Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off
ADVANTAGE SALES: $350MM Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off

ALABAMA INJURY: Seeks Authority to Use IRS Cash Collateral
ALLIANCE SECURITY: Taps Atchison Law Office as New Legal Counsel
AMERICAN TIRE: Bank Debt Trades at 14% Off
ARBORSCAPE INC: Performance Buying CAT262 2001 for $13.5K
ARLINGTON CO.: Selling Venice Real Property and Business for $613K

ASCENA RETAIL: Bank Debt Trades at 4% Off
AT HOME GROUP: S&P Affirms B+ Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
BITE THE BULLET: Meisters Object to Disclosure Statement
BLESSED2BLESS LLC: Taps Nathaniel Webb as Bankruptcy Attorney
BLUE BEE: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral Until Jan. 26

BOSSLER ROOFING: Seeks Dec. 10 Exclusive Period Extension
BRETON MORGAN: Proposes $2.2 Million Sale of Southside Property
BSC HOLDINGS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
CALEXICO COMMUNITY: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Rating on TAB Debt
CALVARY COMMUNITY: Court Allows $126K Reimbursement to B&T

CALVARY COMMUNITY: Trustee Selling Las Vegas Property for $7.75M
CANBRIAM ENERGY: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3, Outlook Negative
CAPITOL STATION 65: Sets Sale Procedures for All Assets
CARDEL MASTER: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
CARITAS INVESTMENT: Court Reduces B&G Marina Claim to $15K

CAROL ROSE: Seeks 60-Day Exclusive Solicitation Period Extension
CEDAR FAIR: Egan-Jones Lowers Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB-
CLEARWAY ENERGY: Moody's Affirms Ba2 CFR, Outlook Stable
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC: Moody's Hikes CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
COBRA WELL: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended Through Nov. 12

COLIMA BBQ: Trustee Selling All Business Assets to Kim for $250K
CONNEAUT LAKE PARK: Bankr. Court Dismisses Park Restoration's SAC
CONSIS INTERNATIONAL: Taps Weiss Serota as Legal Counsel
CONSOLIDATED MFG: Shelley Buying 2015 H&H Cargo Trailer for $3K
COPPER CANYON: Case Summary & 17 Unsecured Creditors

CPM HOLDINGS: Moody's Gives B3 Corp. Family Rating, Outlook Stable
CPM HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'B' ICR
DAILY GAZETTE: Retains Greenway's to Auction Dry Fork Property
DAVIS PULPWOOD: Taps Galloway Wettermark as Legal Counsel
DAWN ACQUISITIONS: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable

DAWN ACQUISITIONS: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
DAYTON SUPERIOR: Moody's Withdraws B3 CFR on Insufficient Info
DDC GROUP: Allowed Interim Use of Cash Collateral Until Dec. 31
DEL MONTE: Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off
DORIAN LPG: Will Hold Its Annual Meeting on December 4

DRY ERASE DESIGNS: Taps Grier Furr as Legal Counsel
DTI HOLDCO: Bank Debt Trades at 3% Off
ELITE VINYL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ENDO SURGICAL: Seeks Dec. 11 Exclusivity Period Extension
ENRON CORP: Banks' Summary Ruling Bids vs Silvercreek Partly OK'd

EPW LLC: Sale of All Assets at Auction Approved
EZE CASTLE: S&P Withdraws 'B' Issuer Credit Rating on Debt Payment
FBJ REAL ESTATE: Andrews Buying Purcellville Property for $770K
FINANCIALLY FIT: Proposes Dell Auction of Six Ogden Parcels
FINISAR CORP: Egan-Jones Lowers Sr. Unsecured Ratings to BB-

FORTERRA INC: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
FQ/LB LP: MG Interests Buying Six Willis Lots for $360K
FR DIXIE: S&P Cuts ICR to 'D' on Missed Payments on Credit Facilty
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off
GATEWAY WIRELESS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

GI REVELATION: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to B-, Outlook Stable
GOLDEN OIL: Exclusive Solicitation Period Extended to Dec. 10
GOLFTHERE CORP: Taps C. Taylor Crockett as Legal Counsel
HARBOR FREIGHT: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'BB-' ICR
HD SUPPLY: Moody's Rates New Secured Term Loan Ba2, Outlook Stable

HOLLEY PURCHASER: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
HOLLEY PURCHASER: S&P Assigns 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
HOSPITALITY INTEGRATED: Cash Collateral Stipulation Gets Final Nod
HUDSON RIVER TRADING: S&P Rates $348.5MM Term Loan Due 2025 'BB-'
HYLAND SOFTWARE: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Alters Outlook to Neg.

HYLAND SOFTWARE: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
HYLAS YACHTS: OIG, LLC Buying Vessel Molds for $156K
IMMACULATA UNIVERSITY: Fitch Affirms BB Rating on $38.4MM Bonds
INPIXON: Chicago Ventures Reports 9.99% Stake as of Oct. 11
INVESTMENT ENERGY: Fitch Assigns BB- LT IDRs, Outlook Stable

IQOR US: Bank Debt Trades at 7% Off
JC PENNEY: Bank Debt Trades at 7% Off
JEFE PLOVER: Tucci Family Trust Buying Reno Property for $505K
JLAN PROPERTIES: Taps David J. Harris as Legal Counsel
JOHN CARROLL: Maple Buying Santa Barbara Property for $2.5M

JP INTERMEDIATE: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
K.E. MARTIN: Colonial Funding Prohibits Use of Cash Collateral
KEITH BLACK: $21K Sale of Interest in Assets to Jios Denied
KING & QUEEN: Piccadilly Buying Baltimore Property for $72K
KOLATH HOTELS: Dist. Court Upholds Ruling in Favor of Greene County

LB STEEL: Court Rules Against Walsh, Carlo Steel for $4.7MM Claim
LIQUIGARD TECHNOLOGIES: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LOCKWOOD HOLDINGS: Wants to Maintain Exclusivity Until Jan. 1
MEDCISION LLC: Taps Mark D. Boyer as Tax Advisor
MGTF RADIO: Seeks Oct. 19 Cash Collateral Use Extension

MICHAEL DAVIDSON: London Buying Huntsville Property for $250K
MID-SOUTH BUSINESS: Allowed to Use Renasant Bank Cash Collateral
MO'S HOUSE: Taps Russell Jeffcoat as Accountant
MODERN VIDEOFILM: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Moved to Dec. 12
MOHEGAN TRIBAL: Bank Debt Trades at 6% Off

MONITRONICS INT'L: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off
MONSTER CONCRETE: Plan Adds Sister Company's Financial Condition
MONTREAL MAINE: Court Denies Wheeling Bid for Stay Pending Appeal
MONTREAL MAINE: Estate Rep. Bid to Dismiss Wheeling Appeal Junked
MOORE CHROME: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

MR. STEVEN: Taps Adams and Reese as Legal Counsel
MULTIFLORA GREENHOUSES: Court Official Unable to Appoint Committee
MURPHY OIL: Fitch Raises LT Issuer Default Rating to 'BB+'
NATOMA STATION: Taps W. Steven Shumway as Legal Counsel
NATURE'S BOUNTY: Bank Debt Trades at 4% Off

NEOVASC INC: Reducer Granted FDA Breakthrough Device Designation
NEWARK SPECIAL: Bank Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING: S&P Rates New $2.676BB Secured Debt 'BB+'
NMN HOLDINGS III: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating
NOON MEDITERRANEAN: Daphne's Buying All Assets for $731K

NORTHERN OIL: Crestview Partners Has 13.4% Stake as of Oct. 1
NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS: Hikes CFO's Annual Salary to $370,000
OPTICAL HOLDINGS: Taps Jackson Lewis as Special Counsel
OUTCOMES GROUP: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
OUTCOMES GROUP: S&P Assigns B Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable

OWENS & MINOR: Bank Debt Trades at 6% Off
PAN AMERICA: Fitch Affirms 'B+/BB' Issuer Default Ratings
PARKLAND FUEL: Moody's Affirms 'Ba3' CFR, Outlook Stable
PARKLAND FUEL: S&P Hikes Issuer Credit Rating to BB, Outlook Stable
PATRIOT COAL: Court Dismisses BDCF Suit and VCLF Countersuit

PEDRO'S OF MADISON: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
PETCO ANIMAL: Bank Debt Trades at 19% Off
PETERSON PRODUCE: Taps Galloway Wettermark as Legal Counsel
POST HOLDINGS: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to B
PRECISION DRILLING: Fitch Revises Outlook on B+ LT IDR to Positive

PRECISION DRILLING: S&P Puts 'BB' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
PRODUCT QUEST: Committee Taps Whiteford Taylor as Co-Counsel
PRODUCT QUEST: Sets Bidding Procedures for Assets
REJUVI LABORATORY: Taps Finestone Hayes as Legal Counsel
RENTPATH INC: Bank Debt Trades at 13% Off

ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE: Seeks Access to Cash Collateral Thru Dec. 30
ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE: Selling Shares of Stock in Three Companies
S&E HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
S.A.M. GROUP: Taps Newmark Moses as Listing Agent
SAMMY ELJAMAL: Order Directing Ch. 11 Trustee Appointment Affirmed

SAMUEL WYLY: Selling Two TDRs for $235K Each
SARAI SERVICES: Taps Sparkman Shepard as Legal Counsel
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS: Moody's Rates Sec. Bank Credit Facility Ba2
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS: S&P Rates New $2.5BB Secured Loans 'BB'
SEADRILL LIMITED: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off

SEARS HOLDINGS: Big Banks Pushed for Chapter 7 Liquidation
SEARS HOLDINGS: Hires M-III Partners for Bankruptcy Filing
SEARS HOLDINGS: Lampert, Banks to Provide Bankruptcy Financing
SEQUA CORP: Fitch Affirms B- Issuer Default Rating, Outlook Stable
SERTA SIMMONS: Bank Debt Trades at 10% Off

SFR GROUP: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off
SHAHEEN SHAHEEN: Kelley Buying West Long Branch Property for $5.25M
SHARING ECONOMY: Receives Noncompliance Notice from Nasdaq
SHO HOLDING I: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa2 & Alters Outlook to Stable
SILVERADO STAGES: Seeks to Hire Sonoran Capital, Appoint CRO

SILVERADO STAGES: Taps Allen Barnes as Legal Counsel
SKILLSOFT CORP: $185MM Bank Debt Trades at 14% Off
SKILLSOFT CORP: $465MM Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
SOUTHCROSS HOLDINGS: S&P Puts 'CCC' ICR to CreditWatch Positive
SOUTHEASTERN HOSPITALITY: Case Summary & 20 Unsecured Creditors

STONE PLACE: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
STONEMOR PARTNERS: Extends Interim Strategic Executive's Term
SUNPLAY POOLS: Taps Fox Law Corp. as Legal Counsel
SUNSET PARTNERS: Trustee May Continue Using Cash Until Dec. 6
SYNTHESIS INDUSTRIAL: Taps Hunter Parker as Legal Counsel

T & S SUBS: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
T CAT ENTERPRISE: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 31
TEBERIO PROPERTIES: Taps Doran & Doran as Legal Counsel
TEMPEST GROUP: Nov. 2 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
THOMAS OVATION: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors

THOR INDUSTRIES: Moody's Assings Ba2 CFR, Outlook Stable
THOR INDUSTRIES: S&P Gives BB Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
THX PROPERTIES: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
TITAN ENERGY: Executives Elect to Reduce Base Salaries
TOPS HOLDING: Seeks Jan. 22 Exclusive Filing Period Extension

TPC GROUP: Fitch Assigns B- Issuer Default Rating, Outlook Stable
TRADER CORP: S&P Assigns B Rating on C$200MM First-Lien Debt
TRANSDIGM GROUP: Fitch Affirms 'B' Issuer Default Rating
TRANSDIGM INC: S&P Places 'B+' ICR on CreditWatch Negative
TRANSMISSION SOLUTIONS: Sunshine Buying Hunker Property for $350K

UVLRX THERAPEUTICS: Creditors Prohibit Further Cash Collateral Use
UVLRX THERAPEUTICS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
VERITAS SOFTWARE: Bank Debt Trades at 3% Off
VERSANT HEALTH: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'B' ICR
VICTOR P. KEARNEY: Ct. Junks Emergency Bid for Stay Pending Appeal

VISITING NURSE: Creditors Panel Hires Marshack Hays as Counsel
WALL STREET LANGUAGES: Berkeley Buying ESL/Career Schools for $64K
WAYNE BAILEY: Court Allows Objection to Scott Farms' PACA Claim
WESTMORELAND COAL: Moody's Lowers CFR to C on Bankr. Filing
WINDSTREAM CORP: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off

WYNN RESORTS: Moody's Rates $400MM Term Loan B 'Ba3', Outlook Neg.
WYNN RESORTS: S&P Assigns BB- Rating on New $400MM Sec. Term Loan
YOU'RE PUTTING: Carson-Meyer Offers $40K for All Business Assets
YUMA ENERGY: Defaults Under Its 2016 Credit Agreement
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 8 to 12, 2018


                            *********

1 GLOBAL: Committee Taps Stichter Riedel as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of 1 Global Capital
LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida to hire Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A.
as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the committee regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; conduct any review or research that may be
required to evaluate the financial and operational condition of 1
Global and its affiliates and their prospects for reorganization;
and provide other legal services related to their Chapter 11
cases.

The firm's hourly rates range from $210 to $500.

Russell Blain, Esq., a shareholder and officer of Stichter,
disclosed in a court filing that his firm is "disinterested" as
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Blain disclosed that his firm has not agreed to a variation of its
standard or customary billing arrangements, and that no Stichter
professional has varied his rate based on the geographic location
of the Debtors' cases.  

The committee is aware of and has approved Stichter's staffing plan
and the firm will, upon the committee's request, try to develop a
budget as the cases progress, Mr. Blain also disclosed.

Stichter can be reached through:

     Russell M. Blain, Esq.
     Stichter Riedel Blain & Postler, P.A.
     110 East Madison Street, Suite 200
     Tampa, FL 33602-4718
     Telephone: (813) 229-0144
     Email: rblain@srbp.com

                      About 1 Global Capital

1 Global Capital, LLC -- https://1stglobalcapital.com/ -- is a
direct small business funder offering an array of flexible funding
solutions, specializing in unsecured business funding and merchant
cash advances.

1 Global Capital LLC, based in Hallandale Beach, FL, and its
debtor-affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Lead Case No. 18-19121) on July 27, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Steven A. Schwartz and Darice Lang, authorized signatories, 1
Global Capital estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and
liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.  

The Hon. Raymond B. Ray presides over the cases.  

The Debtors hired Paul J. Keenan Jr., Esq., at Greenberg Traurig
LLP as their bankruptcy counsel; and Epiq Corporate Restructuring,
LLC as their claims and noticing agent.  The Debtors also hired
Development Specialists, Inc. as their restructuring advisor, and
appointed Bradley Sharp and Joseph Luzinski as chief restructuring
officer and deputy chief restructuring officer, respectively.

On Sept. 7, 2018, the U.S. Trustee for Region 21 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


1ST HOSPITALITY: Taps Stinson Leonard as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
1st Hospitality, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Nebraska to hire Stinson Leonard Street LLP as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the sale of its assets; prepare a plan
of reorganization; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

The hourly rates range from $305 to $730 for partners and counsel,
$250 to $435 for associates, and $135 to $285 for paralegals.

Stinson received a retainer in the sum of $22,500 prior to the
petition date.

Patrick Turner, Esq., at Stinson, disclosed in a court filing that
his firm is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Patrick R. Turner, Esq.
     Stinson Leonard Street, LLP
     1299 Farnam Street, Suite 1500
     Omaha, NE 68102
     Tel: (402) 342-1700
     Fax: (402) 342-1701
     E-mail: Patrick.turner@stinson.com

                       About 1st Hospitality

Based in Mountain Lakes, NJ, 1st Hospitality LLC is the fee simple
owner of a real property located 117 Cody Avenue, Alliance,
Nebraska, with a revenue-based valuation of $1.62 million.

1st Hospitality filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Neb. Case No. 18-41602) on Sept. 29, 2018, listing its total
assets at $1,695,743 and total liabilities at $2,015,767.  The
petition was signed by Anupam Dave, member.

Judge Thomas L. Saladino presides over the case.


2500 WEST LOOP: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 2500 West Loop, Inc.
        60 W. 2nd St.
        Freeport, NY 11520

Business Description: 2500 West Loop, Inc., is a privately held
                      company whose principal assets are located
                      at Suite 422, 2429 Bissonnet St., Houston TX

                      77005.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 12, 2018

Case No.: 18-20459

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Corpus Christi)

Judge: Hon. David R. Jones

Debtor's Counsel: Johnie J. Patterson, Esq.
                  WALKER & PATTERSON, P.C.
                  P.O. Box 61301
                  Houston, TX 77208-1301
                  Tel: 713-956-5577
                  Fax: 713-956-5570
                  E-mail: jjp@walkerandpatterson.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $100,000 to $500,000

The petition was signed by Brad Parker, president.

The Debtor did not file together with its petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-20459.pdf


A-1 INTERNATIONAL: Seeks Authority to Use TD Bank Cash Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A-1 International, Inc., seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to use the cash
collateral subject to the lien of TD Bank, N.A. to continue
operating post-petition.

The Debtor requests authorization to use cash collateral to meet
the ordinary cash needs of the Debtor for the payment of actual
expenses of the Debtor necessary to (a) maintain and preserve the
assets, and (b) continue operation of its business. The Debtor's
Application under Sections 363 and 365 in connection with the sale
of certain business assets and the assignment and assumption of
certain leases are being filed simultaneously with the Cash
Collateral Motion.

Pursuant to that Credit Facility Agreement between TD Bank and the
Debtor, the Debtor was indebted to TD Bank in the aggregate amount
of $1,560,579.82, as of the Petition Date. To secure the
obligations, TD Bank was granted a lien on the existing and future
assets of the prepetition Debtor, including but not limited to its
accounts, inventory, equipment, general intangibles, instruments
and documents.

The Debtor will: (a) continue all reporting to TD Bank as required
under the Agreement, except that all such reporting will be done on
a weekly basis; (b) continue payment of interest to TD Bank, on a
weekly basis, at the rate payable under the Agreement; and (c)
confer with TD Bank and designate, on a weekly basis, excess cash
not required for Debtor's operations in the upcoming week, which
excess cash will be unconditionally paid by the Debtor to TD Bank
on a weekly basis as further adequate protection for the use of TD
Bank's cash collateral, to be applied against the obligations due
from the Debtor to TD Bank.

The Debtor proposes to grant TD Bank a replacement lien on all
post-petition assets, including Debtor's deposit accounts, to
further secure the obligations of the Debtor to TD Bank, and to
provide further adequate protection to TD Bank for the use of its
cash collateral.

TD Bank has consented to a Carve-Out from its security interests in
an amount not to exceed $100,000 subject to allowance by final
order of the Court for: (a) all fees required to be paid to the
Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court and to the Office of the U.S.
Trustee; and (b), the Debtor's retained Professionals

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb18-28512-8.pdf

                     About A-1 International

A-1 International, Inc. -- http://www.aoneonline.com/-- provides
mail center and related office management services, logistics and
warehouse solutions, and local same-day rush delivery services in
New York, New Jersey, Michigan, and Pennsylvania markets.  A-1
International is a privately held company with headquarters based
in Union, New Jersey.

A-1 International filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 18-28512) on Sept. 17, 2018.  In the petition signed by Ronald
DeSena, president, the Debtor disclosed $2,449,826 in assets and
$2,305,684 in liabilities.  Judge Stacey L. Meisel is the case
judge.  The Debtor is represented by Daniel Stolz, Esq. at
Wasserman, Jurista & Stolz, P.C.



ABE'S BOAT: Court Aligns Exclusive Period With Plan Filing Deadline
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to an order dated Oct. 10, 2018, the Hon. Elizabeth W.
Magner of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
Louisiana has extended the exclusive periods for Abe's Boat
Rentals, Inc., to file and to gain acceptance of the plan through
and including to Aug. 31, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2018, respectively.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor is in the process of preparing its plan and disclosure
statement and anticipates filing both, on or before the Aug. 31,
2018 deadline established by the Court.  However, arguably, the
exclusive period has not been extended, and will expire Aug. 27,
prior to the Aug. 31, 2018 plan filing deadline.  Accordingly, the
Debtor requested for a four-day extension of the exclusive period
so that it coincides with the plan filing deadline established by
the Court.

The Debtor maintained that since the Petition Date, it has made
considerable progress toward successfully reorganizing its affairs.
The Debtor claimed that, among other things, its billings and day
rates have improved, and it has made changes to in-house accounting
procedures and personnel, with the assistance of Patrick Gros, CPA,
designed to ensure the proper controls are in place and to assist
with financial planning.

The Debtor stated that its case has several complications,
including change of counsel, maritime law issues, delayed
collections, involvement of the owner's ex-wife (alleged holder 1/2
former community interest in the company's stock) and changes to
the company's internal accounting and control procedures.  Thus,
additional time to focus on collections and work on the company's
accounting issues will enable Debtor to provide more accurate
information regarding its finances and projections, and enable
Debtor to diligently engage in good-faith negotiations with
creditors with an aim toward a consensual plan.

Further, the Debtor revealed that the claims bar date for
non-governmental claims did not expire until Aug. 20, 2018, and
Debtor has not had an opportunity to review and analyze claims
since expiration of the bar date.  Accordingly, additional time is
needed to provide Debtor a more accurate analysis of claims as part
of its disclosure statement.

                   About Abe's Boat Rentals

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc. -- https://www.abesboatrental.com/ -- is a
privately-owned vessel operator located in Belle Chasse, Louisiana,
with a fleet of 19 vessels.  The Company's business segments have
expanded to also provide crews and vessels for environmental
construction, restoration projects and cleanup, plugging and
abandonment, rig decommissioning and other new markets.  Abe's Boat
Rentals was founded in 1979 by Abraham Ton.

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
La. Case No. 18-11102) on April 27, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Hank Ton, president, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.  Congeni Law Firm, LLC, is the
Debtor's counsel.


ACADEMIES OF MATH: S&P Alters Revenue Bond Outlook to Negative
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook to negative from stable and
affirmed its 'BB' long-term rating and underlying rating on the
Arizona Industrial Development Authority's series 2017A, 2018A, and
unenhanced series 2017B education revenue bonds, issued on behalf
of the Academies of Math and Science Inc. (AMS). At the same time,
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' long-term rating to the
authority's series 2018B and 2018C education revenue bonds, also
issued on behalf of AMS. The 'AA-' program rating on the series
2017A and 2018A bonds reflects S&P's view of the bonds'
participation in the Arizona Public School Credit Enhancement
Program.

"The negative outlook reflects our view of AMS's significantly
increased leverage as well as substantial construction and
expansion risk in opening two new schools within a year," said S&P
Global Ratings credit analyst Kaiti Wang. "The school's financial
operations could become strained if construction is not completed
on-budget and on-time, start-up costs are not adequately budgeted,
or if enrollment falls short of expectations. However we maintained
the rating as we believe the school has the ability to achieve the
growth necessary to cover its pro forma MADS, and the management
team has had prior experience with construction projects and
meeting growth targets," Ms. Wang added.

The rating further reflects S&P's view of the school's:

-- Expectation of 0.9x pro forma lease-adjusted MADS (bond MADS
and a facility lease escalated at 2% through 2028) coverage
projected by S&P Global Ratings using fall 2018 enrollment and
assuming similar margins as audited fiscal 2018;

-- Extremely high pro forma lease-adjusted MADS burden at 33% of
fiscal 2018 revenue, including the additional debt to fund two new
schools for fall 2019;

-- Negative governance conditions with four independent board
members, which S&P views as small, and an organizational structure
that presents some conflicts of interest for the contracted
management company's co-CEO who founded the school, though S&P
understands there are conflict of interest policies in place to
mitigate risk; and

-- Potential that its various charters could be revoked or not
renewed as a result of the schools' potential noncompliance with
the terms of the charters (as with all charter schools) prior to
the bonds' final maturity.

Partly offsetting the above weaknesses, in S&P's view, are AMS's:

-- Management team that has a track record of successful expansion
and construction of five campuses;

-- Positive full-accrual operating margins in the past four
audited years despite expansion pressures (fiscal 2018 had below
the line refinancing losses recorded);

-- Good demand, speedy enrollment growth, and noteworthy academic
performance at the flagship campus;

-- Stable state funding environment with moderately positive
annual increases, which are expected to continue; and

-- Long history of solid charter standing with its first charter
received in 2002 and with one renewal and four new charter
contracts obtained since.

The AMS schools consists of:

-- AMS, which holds two charters for and operates AMS Prince in
Tucson (opened in 2002; fall 2018 enrollment of 546) and AMS
Camelback in Phoenix (opened in 2015; fall 2018 enrollment of
1,165);

-- Math & Science Success Academy Inc. (MASSA), which holds the
charter for and operates MASSA in Tucson (opened in 2008; fall 2018
enrollment of 701) and forthcoming AMS Glendale and AMS Peoria to
open in fall 2019; and

-- Academy of Math & Science South Inc. (AMSS), which holds the
charter for and operates AMSS Flower in Phoenix (opened in 2013;
fall 2018 enrollment of 503) and AMSS Desert Sky in Phoenix (opened
in fall 2018 with enrollment of 933 students).


ADVANTAGE ENERGY: Trustee Selling All Assets to RW Bayfront
-----------------------------------------------------------
Loretta Cross, the Chapter 11 trustee for Advantage Energy Joint
Venture ("AEJV"), asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas to authorize the bidding procedures and the
Letter of Intent, together with Amendment thereto, in connection
with the sale of substantially all assets to RW Bayfront, LLC, for
$6 million cash, subject to overbid.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date the
Motion was served.

On Nov. 10, 2017, AEJV filed an adversary complaint against
Advanced Energy Capital, LLC ("AEC").  On Feb. 1, 2018, the
complaint was amended to add Green Bank, N.A.  On Feb. 16, 2018,
the Court entered an Agreed Judgment between AEJV, AEC and Green
Bank.   

In summary, the Debtor is the lessor of certain assets (i.e.,
compressors and generators) to Red River Compression Services
pursuant to the Master Lease, as amended.  Red River is in default
under the Master Lease and has not been making the required
payments for many months due to its poor financial performance.
The Debtor's estate has no other business operations.

Red River has spent months marketing the assets.  Since Red River
has possession of the assets and is operating a business with the
assets, it made sense for Red River to ask an industry buyer.  It
approached several potential buyers.  The Trustee and Red River
have received several letters of intent for the purchase of the
Debtor's assets.  The Trustee believes that the LOI from the Buyer
for the purchase of Assets of the Debtor, is the highest and best
offer presented at this time.  The LOI further describes the Assets
being sold.

After receiving and analyzing the offer, the Trustee has chosen the
Purchaser under the LOI as the "Stalking Horse" for the proposed
auction sale.  The Trustee intends to advertise the sale of the
"Assets," as that term is defined in the attached LOI.  The method
and modes of advertising are still under consideration, and the
Trustee will accept all suggestions from the United States Trustee
and equity interest holders on appropriate advertising of the
Assets for sale.

If one or more timely qualified bids are received, an auction for
the Assets will be conducted by the Trustee or the estate's counsel
on a date set by the Court in November 2018, commencing at 10:00 a
.m. (CST) in Courtroom 600, located on the 6th Floor of the Bob
Casey Federal Building, which is located at 515 Rusk Street,
Houston, Texas.  The purchase price being offered is $6 million
cash.

The Assets will be sold free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances.  The $6 million in cash will be used to pay (i) ad
valorem taxes on the Assets, (ii) sales taxes due related to the
previous rental of the Assets, and (iii) available to satisfy
administrative claims, including the U.S. Trustee fees, the
Trustee's fees and the fees of her professionals (together with a
reserve for expected future fees and expenses expected to be
incurred in connection with the case, and fees for counsel for Red
River).

The balance will be paid to the secured lenders, Woodforest Bank
and the assignee of Green Bank (or other lenders or owner) in the
amount determined as stated on the Waterfall Analysis: The assignee
of Green Bank has approved the transactions and has agreed to allow
the Administrative Claim Reserve and to release any interest in
those funds, except to the extent there may be any excess funds
available, and the Trustee has requested that Woodforest agree as
well.  The Assignee of Green Bank has agreed to the foregoing
treatment, and the Trustee has requested that Woodforest agree as
well.  Any proceeds from unencumbered assets will first be used to
fund the Administrative Claim Reserve.

The salient terms of the LOI are:

     a. Terms" The transaction contemplated by the LOI is the
purchase by the Buyer of all of the Assets for a purchase price of
$6 million, subject to the approval of the Court and Red River
Members and Managers as applicable.

     b. Conditions to Closing: Subject to the due diligence period
and execution of the APA, the Transaction would close 30 days after
approval by the Court.

     c. Financing: As a condition to AEJV asking Court approval of
the Transaction, the Buyer will have secured any required financing
or funding necessary to close the Transaction and the Transaction
will not be subject to or conditioned on RW Bayfront's ability to
obtain financing or otherwise acquire funds necessary to close the
Transaction.

     d. Break-Up Fee: $200,000

     e. Bankruptcy Court Approval/Termination: Within 20 days of
execution of the LOI by RW Bayfront, Red River and AEJV, the AEJV
Chapter 11 Trustee will file a motion with the Court acting in the
Chapter 11 Case to approve the LOI and to establish certain bidding
procedures for the sale of the Assets.

     f. Fees, Costs and Expenses: Each party thereto will be
responsible for its own costs and fees, including lawyers,
accountants and advisors with regard to the Transaction, regardless
of whether the Transaction closes.  Red River and AEJV will be
responsible for their respective pro rata portion of ad valorem
taxes through the date of closing.

     g. Escrow Deposit: $75,000

Once the LOI is approved, the Trustee intends to advertise the
sale.  The Trustee has proposed the Bid Procedures and would ask
that the Court approve same so that such Bid Procedures can be made
available to all interested buyers.  If creditors or equity
interest holders have suggested revisions to the Bid Procedures,
the Trustee would be happy to consider same.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Nov. (TBD), 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (CST)

     b. Initial Bid: $6.25 million

     c. Deposit: $75,000

     d. Auction: An Auction for the Sale Assets will be conducted
by the Court on Nov. (TBD), 2018 commencing at 1:00 p.m. (CST) in
Courtroom 600, located on the 6th Floor of the Bob Casey Federal
Building, which is located at 515 Rusk Street, Houston, Texas
77002.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

The Trustee further asks that she be authorized to enter into the
LOI, which will be binding on the Debtor's estate in accordance
with its terms.  As provided in the LOI, the Break-Up Fee will
constitute administrative expenses of the Debtor's estate if and
when due.  She further asks that she be authorized and directed to
pay the Break-Up Fee to the purchaser under the LOI in accordance
with the provisions of LOI, without further action or order of the
Court.  Lastly, she asks that the Court approves the Administrative
Claim Reserve and confirms that the secured lenders have released
any interest in these funds so that the expenses can be paid,
except to the extent there may be any excess funds after full
payment of the admin claims.

The Trustee also asks authority to consent to the sale of the
Assets subject to the Master Lease and to release any interest in
the Assets so the sale can occur.  Red River will also convey any
interest it may have against the Assets or under the Master Lease
to the Purchaser at closing.

A copy of the LOI and Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Advantage_Energy_182_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

          RW BAYFRONT, LLC
          558 West 6th Street
          Erie, PA 16507
          Telephone: (814) 455-2761

               About Advantage Energy Joint Venture

Consultants International Services LP and Meredith Interests
Consulting LP filed an involuntary Chapter 11 petition against
Advantage Energy Joint Venture on July 26, 2017 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 17-34469).  The case is assigned to Judge Jeff Bohm.  The
petitioners are represented by Gregg K. Saxe, Esq., in Houston,
Texas.

On Sept. 21, 2017, the court denied an application to dismiss the
involuntary petition and thereafter entered an order for relief.

Loretta Cross was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.  The
trustee hired Stout Risius Ross, LLC as her financial advisor.


ADVANTAGE SALES: $1.80BB Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off
---------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Advantage Sales &
Marketing is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 92.05
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 0.87 percentage points from
the previous week. Advantage Sales pays 325 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $1.80 billion facility. The bank loan
matures on July 25, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and Standard
& Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


ADVANTAGE SALES: $225MM Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off
--------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Advantage Sales &
Marketing is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 92.05
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 0.87 percentage points from
the previous week. Advantage Sales pays 325 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $225 million facility. The bank loan
matures on July 25, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and Standard
& Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


ADVANTAGE SALES: $350MM Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off
--------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Advantage Sales &
Marketing is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 92.05
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 0.87 percentage points from
the previous week. Advantage Sales pays 325 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $350 million facility. The bank loan
matures on July 25, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and Standard
& Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


ALABAMA INJURY: Seeks Authority to Use IRS Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------
Alabama Injury and Pain Clinic seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama to use cash
collateral to preserve the going value of its business
enterprises.

The Debtor operates a chiropractic practice which provides medical
services to persons who have suffered injuries. The Debtor has been
referred to potential patients from many local attorneys to assist
in the treatment of these injuries and to help in rehabilitation of
the injured.

The Debtor has accepted the referrals with the expectation that
when the injury case is resolved, the incurred treatments costs
will be paid to him by the referring attorney from the settlement
proceeds.

When the Debtor filed this Chapter 11, the Internal Revenue Service
claims it is owed approximately $349,906 which the Debtor disputes.
Prior to the filing of this Chapter 11, the IRS issued levies to
the referring attorneys, which if allowed, will cripple the
Debtors' ability to rehabilitate and reorganize itself.

Accordingly, the Debtor requests the Court to allow it to use the
receipts from these referrals as well as private pays to operate
and pay its day to day expenses.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/alsb18-03685-11.pdf

                    About Alabama Injury

Alabama Injury and Pain Clinic, a provider of medical services to
persons who have suffered injuries, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 18-03685) on Sept. 11, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Dr. James Gordon, owner, the Debtor estimated
less than $50,000 in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in
liabilities.  Friedman, Poole & Friedman, P.C., led by Barry A.
Friedman, serves as counsel to the Debtor.


ALLIANCE SECURITY: Taps Atchison Law Office as New Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Alliance Security, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Rhode Island to hire Atchison Law Office
as its new legal counsel.

Atchison will substitute for Shechtman Halperin Savage, LLP, the
law firm initially employed by the Debtor in connection with its
Chapter 11 case.

James Atchison, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
charges an hourly fee of $250.

Mr. Atchison disclosed in a court filing that he and his firm do
not have any connection with the Debtor or other "parties in
interest."

The firm can be reached through:

     James G. Atchison, Esq.
     Atchison Law Office
     301 Providence Street
     West Warwick, RI 02893
     Tel: (401) 222-9374
     Email: james.atchison@gmail.com

                     About Alliance Security

Based in Warwick, Rhode Island, Alliance Security, Inc. --
http://www.alliancesecurity.com/-- is a security system supplier.


Alliance Security filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.R.I. Case No. 17-11190) on July 14, 2017, estimating its
assets and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  The
petition was signed by Jasjit Gotra, its president and CEO.

Judge Diane Finkle presides over the case.  

The Debtor tapped Venable, LLP as its special counsel, and DiSanto,
Priest & Co. as its accountant.

The U.S. Trustee for the District of Rhode Island appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors on July 27, 2017.  The
Committee hired Robinson & Cole LLP as its counsel.


AMERICAN TIRE: Bank Debt Trades at 14% Off
------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which American Tire
Distributors Inc. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at
86.50 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September
28, 2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.22 percentage points from
the previous week. American Tire pays 425 basis points above LIBOR
to borrow under the $720 million facility. The bank loan matures on
October 1, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'CCC-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


ARBORSCAPE INC: Performance Buying CAT262 2001 for $13.5K
---------------------------------------------------------
ArborScape, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Colorado to authorize the sale of a CAT262 2001 to Performance
Construction for $13,500.

The Debtor listed Performance as a creditor with a claim in the
amount of $19,995 on its Schedule E/F.  The Equipment is subject to
a blanket statutory lien in favor of the Internal Revenue Service.

The Debtor and Performance believe the fair market value of the
Equipment is $13,500 pursuant to the Debtor's Amended Schedule A/B.
The Debtor believes the price is fair and reasonable.  

The Equipment is not necessary for the Debtor's reorganization
efforts.  The sale will allow the Debtor to reduce the secured
claim of the IRS by $13,500 for the benefit of the estate and its
creditors, and will further allow the Debtor to get rid of
depreciating property for which it no longer has a use.

The Debtor asks authorization to sell the Equipment free and clear
of liens, claims and encumbrances and other interests.  It believes
that the IRS will consent to the sale, as the funds generated from
the sale of the Equipment will be paid to the IRS.

                     About Arborscape, Inc.

ArborScape, Inc., is a Colorado-based company dedicated to
providing sustainable landscapes for its clients by promoting the
art and science of horticulture using environmentally friendly
products and services.  It offers tree trimming and removal
services, tree spraying, lawn and tree care services.  The company
was founded in 1995.

ArborScape sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 18-12660) on April 3, 2018.  In the
petition signed by David Merriman, president, the Debtor disclosed
$1.63 million in assets and $1.54 million in liabilities.  Judge
Joseph G. Rosania Jr. presides over the case.


ARLINGTON CO.: Selling Venice Real Property and Business for $613K
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Arlington Co. of Sarasota, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to authorize the sale of the
commercial real estate located on highway 41 in Venice, Florida for
$550,000; and a florist business, also known as 1836 S. Tamiami
Trail, Venice, Florida for $63,000, to Always an Occasion Florist
and Decor, LLC.

On June 26, 2018, the Debtor filed a Motion to Sell Debtor's
Commercial Real Estate and Certain Business Assets Free and Clear
of Liens.  Said motion attached a Contract to sell the business and
certain assets of the business and the commercial real estate for a
total price of $625,000.  There was a real estate purchase contract
attached which showed the real estate portion was being sold for
$550,000 out of the $625,000.  The business and certain business
assets were to be sold for the remaining $75,000 out of the
$625,000.

On Aug. 10, 2018, the Court entered an order granting that motion,
allowing the real estate and business assets to be sold for
$625,000.  The order did not separate the price of sale for the
business assets amount from the real estate amount.

The list of assets on the sales contract which are being sold
included a 2013 Nissan Van.  A review of the records shows that the
van is titled in the name of the shareholder, Brenda Smith, and not
in the business.

The van is encumbered by a lien held by Nissan Motor Acceptance
Corp. and Brenda Smith is responsible for the debt.  The value of
the van and the debt on the van is approximately $12,000.

Since the Debtor does not own the van, the $12,000 value of the van
must be deducted from the $75,000 business purchase price offer,
reducing the purchase price of the Debtor's business assets to the
amount of $63,000.  To facilitate the closing, Brenda Smith will
sell the vehicle to the purchaser for $12,000 and use the funds
received to pay off the debt on the vehicle, to Nissan Motor
Acceptance.  

The shareholder of the Debtor, Paul Smith, has been in ill health
and is in the hospital.  Mr. and Mrs. Smith have not been able to
continue to work in the business.  In order to preserve the
business operations, the Debtor wishes to close on the sale of the
business by Oct. 1, 2018, and the Buyer is willing to pay cash and
close on the business by Oct. 1, 2018.  The parties are still
working toward a closing on the real estate by the end of October
or beginning of November 2018, but cannot close on the real estate
by Oct. 1, 2018.

The parties wish to close on the sale of the business and have the
Buyer enter into a short term lease of the real estate until the
closing on the real estate.  This lease would allow the property to
remain insured and protected until the closing on the purchase.
The October cost of the lease would be the assumption of all of the
liability and property insurance and utilities.

The Debtor wishes to have the Court enter an Order Clarifying the
Order Granting Motion to Sell Debtor's Commercial Real Estate and
Certain Business Assets Free and Clear of Liens, and on the Motion
stating that the Debtor may sell the business assets separately
from the real estate and that the price for the sale will be
$63,000 for the business assets and $550,000 for the real estate.
The Order Granting Motion to Sell Debtor's Commercial Real Estate
and Certain Business Assets Free and Clear of Liens shall otherwise
remain in full force and effect and the order will simply clarifies
to have the amount separated and the closings on separate dates.

              About The Arlington Company of Sarasota

The Arlington Company of Sarasota, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-04164) on May 21, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than
$500,000.  The Debtor tapped Melody Genson, Esq., as its legal
counsel.


ASCENA RETAIL: Bank Debt Trades at 4% Off
-----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Ascena Retail Group
Inc. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 96.33
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 2.92 percentage points from
the previous week. Ascena Retail pays 450 basis points above LIBOR
to borrow under the $1.8 billion facility. The bank loan matures on
August 21, 2022. Moody's rates the loan 'Ba3' and Standard & Poor's
gave a 'B+' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday,
September 28.



AT HOME GROUP: S&P Affirms B+ Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' issuer credit rating on home
decor retailer At Home Group Inc. The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P affirmed the 'BB-' issue-level rating and '2'
recovery rating on the company's senior secured first-lien term
loan.

S&P said, "As of October 10, 2018 financial sponsors AEA Investors
L.P. and Starr Investment Holdings LLC reduced their combined
ownership to a noncontrolling less than 27% (from 47% at the time
of our last publication on At Home, Aug. 24, 2018) through a
secondary offering of the company's common stock. In our opinion,
this private equity partial exit is a credit positive event as the
risk of financial sponsor-led debt-funded growth and shareholder
returns is reduced. As a result, we revised our financial policy
assessment to neutral from FS-5 and affirmed all ratings.

"S&P Global Ratings' stable outlook reflects our expectation that
At Home will continue to execute its growth strategy amid ongoing
slow general economic growth, with modest margin expansion. It also
reflects our expectation that FOCF is on the path to turn and
remain positive within the next 18-24 months with corresponding
decreased reliance on funding under the revolver for new-store
growth and debt to EBITDA below 5x.

"We could raise the rating if the company gains a more substantial
presence in its core customer markets, establishes a track record
of executing in varying economic conditions, and maintains leverage
of about 4x or less while predictably generating meaningfully
positive free cash flow.

"We could lower the rating if credit measures do not improve such
that we expect debt to EBITDA to remain above 5x. This could occur
if At Home cannot manage growth on a leverage-neutral basis,
whether from competitive pressures or traffic and ticket declines.

One such scenario would occur if comparable sales turn negative,
and gross and EBITDA margins decline by more than 150 basis points
(bps)."



BITE THE BULLET: Meisters Object to Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------
David and Diane Meister, creditors and holders of 50% of the equity
securities of Bite the Bullet, LLC, object (i) to the approval of
the Disclosure Statement describing the Chapter 11 Plan for the
Debtor because the Disclosure Statement does not contain "adequate
information," as required by section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code,
and (ii) to confirmation of the Plan because the Plan does not
satisfy the requirements of section 1129(a) and (b) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The hearing to consider final approval of the Disclosure Statement
and confirmation of the Plan has been continued from time to time
to allow the Meisters and Zitiello to discuss a consensual
resolution of the Meisters' claims on terms that are, among other
things, fair and equitable, rather than the treatment currently
afforded them under the Plan. Unfortunately, the parties were
unable to come to a consensual resolution and the Meisters now
submit the objections which follow.

The Meisters complain that the Debtor fails to disclose, let alone
detail, the substantial claims that exist against Zitiello for,
among other things, breach of fiduciary duty and fraudulent
conveyance and that collectively represent a significant asset of
the estate.  The Debtor also failed to include in the liquidation
analysis additional assets such as cash, which according to the
most recent monthly operating report for the period ending August
31, 2018, filed by the Debtor aggregates $111,117.35.  Nor is there
any discussion of other valuable assets set forth in the Schedules
such as equipment and inventory which are stated in parts 5 and 8
as totaling $412,426.02.  The Debtor's election to include in the
liquidation analysis only unencumbered assets appears therefore to
be a device to hide these assets since the secured creditor's claim
is to be satisfied under the Plan mainly from the Debtor's future
cash flow, and not from these assets which will instead be retained
by the Debtor.

The Meisters are represented by:

     John P. Aldrich, Esq.
     ALDRICH LAW FIRM, LTD.
     1601 S. Rainbow Blvd., Suite 160
     Las Vegas, NV 89146
     Tel: (702) 853-5490
     Fax: (702) 227-1975
     Email: jaldrich@johnaldrichlawfirm.com

         - and -

     Jeffrey M. Levinson, Esq.
     LEVINSON, LLP
     55 Public Square, Suite 1750
     Cleveland, OH 44113
     Tel: (216) 514-4935
     Fax: (216) 532-2212
     Email: jml@jml-legal.com

                     About Bite the Bullet

Bite The Bullet LLC -- https://www.bitethebullet.co -- is an
ammunition supplier based in Las Vegas, Nevada. Bite the Bullet is
a licensed, insured, and ATF approved Federal Firearm License(FFL)
manufacturer of commercially loaded Ammo. Since 2013, Bite the
Bullet has been supplying bulk ammo online offering a variety of
high use popular calibers.

Bite The Bullet LLC, based in North Las Vegas, NV, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-12813) on May 16, 2018.
The Hon. Laurel E. Babero presides over the case.  Robert Atkinson,
Esq., at Atkinson Law Associates Ltd., serves as bankruptcy
counsel.  In the petition signed by David Zitiello Jr., managing
member, the Debtor disclosed $465,433 in assets and $1.26 million
in liabilities.



BLESSED2BLESS LLC: Taps Nathaniel Webb as Bankruptcy Attorney
-------------------------------------------------------------
Blessed2Bless LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Virginia to hire Nathaniel Webb, III, Esq.,
as its attorney.

Mr. Webb will advise the Debtor concerning the administration of
its bankruptcy estate; negotiate with creditors; assist in the
preparation of a plan of reorganization; investigate the existence
of other assets of the estate and to have them turned over to the
estate; and provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11
case.

The Debtor paid the attorney $783 for the services it provided
prior to the petition date, plus $1,171 for the filing fee.

Mr. Webb disclosed in a court filing that his firm is
"disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Mr. Webb maintains an office at:

     Nathaniel J. Webb, III, Esq.  
     708-C Thimble Shoals Blvd.
     Newport News, VA 23606
     Phone: (757) 240-4300
     Fax: (757) 240-4308
     Email: bankruptcy@natwebb.hrcoxmail.com

                        Blessed2Bless LLC

Blessed2Bless LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 18-73285) on Sept. 19,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Stephen C. St. John presides over the case.


BLUE BEE: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral Until Jan. 26
--------------------------------------------------------------
Blue Bee, Inc., d/b/a ANGL, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to use cash
collateral in accordance with the Debtor's operating budget for the
14-week period from Oct. 21, 2018 through and including Jan. 26,
2019.

The Debtor requires access to its cash collateral to pay all of the
expenses set forth in the Budget, with authority to deviate from
the line items contained in the Budget by up to 20%, on both a line
item and aggregate basis, with any unused portions to be carried
over into the following weeks, and to pay all quarterly fees owing
to the Office of the U.S. Trustee and all expenses owing to the
Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court.

The Debtor is currently operating a total of twelve Retail Stores,
which comprise the core group of retail stores around which the
Debtor intends to reorganize.

The Debtor's senior secured lender is the Pacific City Bank.  As of
the Petition Date, the Debtor was a borrower under three separate
loans with the Bank, two of which have since been fully repaid and
satisfied.  The Debtor is currently indebted to the Bank in the
amount of approximately $1,180,000 under the U.S. Small Business
Administration loan.  The Bank is asserting a lien against
substantially all of the assets of the Debtor and Angl, Inc.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor also obtained a secured loan
in the amount of $6,000 from Fashblvd., Inc.  Flashblvd asserts a
lien against substantially all of the assets of the Debtor.

The California State Board of Equalization has one active state tax
lien. The Debtor believes that the amount owed to SBOE which is
secured by the foregoing tax lien is $24,160.

The Debtor believes that the Bank, Fashblvd, and the SBOE are the
only parties that may potentially have a perfected security
interest in the Debtor's cash.  The Debtor submits that the value
of such Secured Creditors' interests in the Debtor's cash
collateral will be adequately protected by a substantial equity
cushion.  

As of Oct. 21, 2018 (the beginning date of the proposed new
Budget), the Debtor anticipates that it will be holding cash on
hand of approximately $124,339, security deposits totaling
approximately $53,215, inventory valued at approximately $2,275,000
(at cost), and FF&E with an estimated fair market value of
approximately $600,000.  Based on the foregoing, the aggregate
value of the Debtor's assets as of Oct. 21, 2018 is estimated to be
$3,052,554.

The Debtor believes that the total amount currently owed to the
Secured Creditors is approximately $1,210,160, calculated as
follows: (i) approximately $1,180,000 to the Bank, based upon the
SBA Loan only, since both the First Term Loan and Second Term Loan
have now been paid off, (ii) $6,000 to Fashblvd, and (iii)
approximately $24,160 to the SBOE.  Given the aggregate value of
the Debtor's assets (i.e., approximately $3,052,554), and the total
estimated amount currently owed to the Debtor's Secured Creditors
(i.e., approximately $1,210,160), the Secured Creditors are
adequately protected by an equity cushion of more than 150%.

The Debtor also proposes to provide its Secured Creditors with
replacement liens and security interests against the Debtor's
postpetition assets, with such replacement liens to have the same
extent, validity, and priority as the prepetition liens held by
such Secured Creditors against the Debtor's assets.

Additionally, the Debtor submits that the value of the Secured
Creditors' interest in the cash collateral will be adequately
protected by, among other things, the maintenance and continued
operation of the Debtor's business.  By doing so, the Debtor will
be able to, among other things, maximize the value of its inventory
and generate as much revenue as possible from the sale of such
inventory.

On February 14, 2018, the law firm of Matern Law Group, PC, filed
these proofs of claim in the Debtor's bankruptcy case:

   (a) a proof of claim on behalf of Benix Morante, Jennifer
Dominguez, and April Bojorquez, individually and as purported class
representatives, pursuant to which the Alleged Class asserts a
claim in excess of $30,000,000 against the Debtor, including a
priority claim of $214,643.84, based upon certain "wage and hour"
claims alleged against the Debtor in a pre-petition action
initiated before the Los Angeles Superior Court, which action bears
the case number BC542008 ("Alleged Class POC"); and

   (b) a proof of claim on behalf of Benix Morante, individually,
pursuant to which Morante asserts a claim in the sum of $1,500,000
against the Debtor based upon certain claims of discrimination,
harassment, sexual battery, retaliation and wrongful termination
alleged against the Debtor in a prepetition action initiated before
the Los Angeles Superior Court, which action bears the case number
BC567121 ("Morante POC").

The Debtor anticipates filing a Plan and disclosure statement in
this case, and pursuing Court approval of such disclosure statement
and confirmation of such Plan, promptly after the Debtor obtains an
adjudication of the Alleged Class POC and Morante POC (even if on a
preliminary basis).  The Debtor hopes to obtain an adjudication of
the Alleged Class POC and Morante POC within the next few months.
Therefore, the period covered by the Budget (i.e., Oct. 21, 2018 --
Jan. 12, 2019) represents a critical period in the Debtor's case.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb16-23836-386.pdf

                        About Blue Bee

Headquartered near downtown Los Angeles, California in Vernon,
California, Blue Bee, Inc., doing business as ANGL, is a retailer
doing business under the "ANGL" brand offering stylish and
contemporary women's clothing at reasonable prices to its
fashion-savvy customers.  As of Oct. 19, 2016, Blue Bee owns and
operates 21 retail stores located primarily in shopping malls
throughout the state of California.  Founders Jeff Sunghak Kim and
his wife, Young Ae Kim, continue to be actively involved in Blue
Bee's business operations as the President and Secretary of the
Company, respectively.

Blue Bee filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
16-23836) on Oct. 19, 2016.  In the petition signed by Jeff Sungkak
Kim, its president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at
$1 million to $10 million.  Judge Sandra R. Klein is the case
judge.  Juliet Y. Oh, Esq., at Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill
LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


BOSSLER ROOFING: Seeks Dec. 10 Exclusive Period Extension
---------------------------------------------------------
Bossler Roofing, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to extend the Debtor's exclusive
periods to file a plan of reorganization and to solicit acceptances
of its plan through and including Dec. 10, 2018, and Feb. 8, 2019,
respectively.

The Debtor asserts that it is not seeking this extension to delay
the administration of the case or to pressure creditors to accept
an unsatisfactory plan. Instead, the Debtor requests the extension
of the Exclusive Periods in order to allow it to move forward in an
orderly, efficient and cost-effective manner to maximize the value
of its assets.

The deadline for creditors in this case to file proofs of claims
was April 9, 2018.  However, the Debtor filed a Motion for
Supplemental Bar Date to allow additional creditors not listed on
the initial Schedules to file a Proof of Claim. In that Motion, the
Debtor requested a supplemental bar date which was set to September
17, 2018.

In addition, the Debtor's counsel has had trouble reaching the
Debtor and has had communication issues with the Debtor to finalize
the plan terms.

                     About Bossler Roofing

Bossler Roofing, Inc., is a Lake Worth, Florida-based roofing
company owned by Christopher Bossler.  The company offers
installation services of all roofing systems, concrete roof tile
restoration, attic radiant and reflective roof coating energy
saving applications, concrete tile and asphalt shingle "Cool Roof"
energy star installations, Henry Roof Certified waterproofing (flat
roof installation) services, Poly-Foam Certified (Metro-Dade County
approved concrete and clay roof tile adhesive application)
installations, and all commercial and residential roof repairs,
from minor to major leak penetrations.

Bossler Roofing, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 17-24798) on Dec. 12, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Christopher Bossler, its president, the Debtor disclosed
$567,055 in assets and $1.06 million in liabilities.  This case is
assigned to Judge Paul G. Hyman, Jr.  Craig I. Kelley, Esq., at
Kelley & Fulton, P.L., is the Debtor's general counsel.


BRETON MORGAN: Proposes $2.2 Million Sale of Southside Property
---------------------------------------------------------------
Breton Lee Morgan asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Western Virginia to authorize the sale of 361 acres of
real estate located at 15018 Kanawha Valley Road, Southside, Mason
County, West Virginia to Lance Thornton and Dr. Susan Mullooly for
$2.2 million.

The Debtor owns the Property.  The Property is encumbered by the
first deed of Trust of Peoples Bank in the amount of approximately
$515,000 and a second position tax lien held by the West Virginia
State Tax Department in the amount of approximately $4,000.
Unsecured claims, including unsecured debts listed on the Debtor's
schedules, total approximately $500,000.  The Property was listed
on the Debtor's bankruptcy schedules with a value of $3 million.

On Sept. 19, 2018, the Debtor entered into a Real Estate Purchase
Agreement with the Purchasers for the sum of $2.2 million, free and
clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances and interests.  The
Purchasers have no claim against or relationship with the Debtor
and the Agreement was negotiated at arm's-length.

A copy of the Real Estate Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Breton_Morgan_38_Sales.pdf

The Debtor believes that the Purchase Price is fair and reasonable.
The purchase price of $2.2 million far exceeds the $1 million of
secured and unsecured claims owed by the Debtor.  

The Property to be conveyed includes real estate and some
furnishings owned by the Debtor.  The purchase price is payable in
cash at Closing.  The Closing is contingent upon Purchaser
obtaining financing and will occur within 40 days after entry of an
Order by the Court approving the sale.

The Seller will pay transfer tax, deed preparation cost, and any
other closing costs typically paid by a seller in accordance with
the prevailing local practice.  The Purchasers will pay for any
survey, title exam, recording fees and ant other closing costs
typically paid by a purchaser in accordance with the prevailing
local practice.  The real estate taxes will be prorated as of the
date of closing.

The Purchasers have requested, and the Debtor agrees, that the
secured claims of Peoples Bank and the West Virginia State Tax
Department will attach to the proceeds of sale and will be paid at
closing.  The Debtor will escrow funds for payment of
administrative claims and unsecured claims which will be disbursed
only upon further Order of the Court.

The objection deadline is Oct. 12, 2018.

Counsel for Debtor:

          Joe M. Supple, Esq.
          SUPPLE LAW OFFICE, PLLC
          801 Viand Street
          Point Pleasant, WV 25550
          Telephone: (304) 675-6249

Breton Lee Morgan sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. W.V.
Case No. 18-30219) on May 15, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Joe M.
Supple, Esq., as counsel.



BSC HOLDINGS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of BSC Holdings, LLC as of Oct. 10, according
to a court docket.

                        About BSC Holdings

On July 13, 2018, BSC Holdings, LLC, filed a petition for relief
under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code which was subsequently
converted to a Chapter 11 proceeding on August 23, 2018 (Bankr.
M.D. Tenn. Case no. 18-04636). At the time of filing, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $0 to $50,000 in
liabilities.  Alexander S. Koval, Esq., at Rothschild & Ausbrooks,
PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


CALEXICO COMMUNITY: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Rating on TAB Debt
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew its 'A-' and 'CCC+' long-term ratings
on Calexico Community Redevelopment Agency, Calif.'s previously
rated school district tax allocation bonds (TAB) debt. At the same
time, S&P Global Ratings removed the ratings from CreditWatch with
negative implications, where they had been placed on Feb. 6, 2017.


This action follows repeated attempts by S&P Global Ratings to
obtain timely information of satisfactory quality to maintain S&P's
ratings on the securities in accordance with its applicable
criteria and policies. The withdrawal of these ratings was
preceded, in accordance with its policies, by any change to the
ratings that it considers appropriate given available information.


CALVARY COMMUNITY: Court Allows $126K Reimbursement to B&T
----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Mike K. Nakagawa granted Barnes & Thornburg LLP
first and final application for compensation and reimbursement of
expenses for the time period of April 1, 2018 through June 30,
2018.

The B&T Fee Application sought the allowance of attorney's fees in
the amount of $123,114.50 and costs in the amount of $5,595.25 for
211.5 hours of services rendered from April 1, 2018 through June
30, 2018. Notice was properly given and only the Chapter 11 trustee
has objected to the compensation requested by her former lead
bankruptcy counsel.

The instant fee application is accompanied by hourly billing
statements. The application summarizes the contents of the B&T
Billing Statement by using the various "project categories" of
services described in the professional compensation guidelines
issued by the UST.

The Chapter 11 trustee does not object to the hourly rates billed
by the various professionals tasked by B&T to perform services in
this case. Instead, she objects both to specific time entries
appearing in the B&T Billing Statement, and to the overall amount
of the fees and costs sought. The Chapter 11 trustee's specific
reductions are set forth in seven separate "tables" of billing
entries appearing in the Objection. The objections contained in
these seven tables appear to fall into three categories.

B&T argues that the services rendered were reasonable under Section
330 and properly requested in this case. Moreover, B&T maintains
that neither a disallowance of specific billing entries, nor an
across the board reduction of the total requested compensation is
appropriate.

Having considered Table 1 and Table 2, as well as the substance of
the Chapter 11 trustee's argument, however, the court overrules the
Category One objection. By its nature, internal communications
within a law firm create some duplication, but the intended purpose
of such communication is to coordinate services on behalf of the
client. The court's review of the time entries in Table 1 does not
reveal an amount of duplication that is unreasonable in this case.
The court, therefore, concludes that the Chapter 11 trustee's
request to disallow fees for these services is without merit.

The Chapter 11 trustee also argues that B&T billed for too much
time in four discrete areas. The Chapter 11 trustee does not
suggest that services in those areas were unnecessary, but only
that the time spent by the B&T firm was excessive.

The expenditure of 23 hours to prepare the B&T Fee Application
appears is excessive inasmuch as the B&T Billing Statement already
was separated into the project categories used in the UST
Guidelines. B&T admittedly prepared its fee application using the
UST Guidelines. Construction of the fee application primarily
involved preparing a summary of the services performed in each
project category, and a single paragraph explaining the necessity
for the services. While lead counsel in a Chapter 11 proceeding
seldom are terminated mid-case, preparation of the instant
application was otherwise routine because B&T was unaware of
whether the Chapter 11 trustee would even object. Under these
circumstances, the court agrees with the Chapter 11 trustee that a
portion of the total amount of fees for preparation of the B&T Fee
Application, including the Estimated Additional Fee, should be
disallowed. The total amount of $6,000 will be allowed for
preparation and presentation of the instant fee application, and
the balance of the amount requested for this task is disallowed.

The Chapter 11 trustee also maintains that the B&T firm has not
complied with the UST Guidelines.  She relies on Table "7" to list
time entries reflecting 86.10 hours billed by B&T professionals and
seeks disallowance of $40,047.50 in fees for vague time entries or
$37,280.50 for lumped time entries. In response, B&T has provided
an additional description of the services rendered, separates out
the services lumped together, or both. At the hearing on the B&T
Fee Application, no suggestion was made by the Chapter 11 trustee
that the additional information supplied by B&T is insufficient to
meet the UST Guidelines. More important, the court has reviewed
Reply Exhibit 1 and concludes that B&T has provided sufficient
information to discern the professional services performed and the
time spent by the fee applicant as required by Section 330. The
disallowances requested in this category are without merit.

Thus, the court will allow professional compensation for the
project categories specified in the B&T Fee Application as follows:
$46,496 for Asset Disposition, $2,665 for Business Operations,
$11,812.50 for Case Administration, $15,961 for Claims
Administration and Objections, $14,077.50 for Employment and Fee
Applications,29 and $29,695 for Financing and Cash Collateral. The
total allowed amount of professional fees is $120,707 Reimbursement
for costs advanced is allowed in the total amount of $6,175.25. The
total amount of allowed professional fees and reimbursement of
costs will be $126,882.25.

The bankruptcy case is in re: CALVARY COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY OF GOD,
INC., Chapter 11, Debtor, Case No. 17-13475-MKN (Bankr. D. Nev.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated Sept. 28, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2yEik9d from Leagle.com.

CALVARY COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY OF GOD, INC., Debtor, represented by
ANGELA J. LIZADA , LIZADA LAW FIRM, LTD.

KAVITA GUPTA, Trustee, represented by OGONNA M. BROWN , LEWIS ROCA
ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE.

U.S. TRUSTEE - LV - 11, U.S. Trustee, represented by EDWARD M.
MCDONALD , OFFICE OF U.S. TRUSTEE.

             About Calvary Community Assembly of God

Calvary Community Assembly of God -- http://www.ccalv.org/-- is a
Pentecostal church in Las Vegas, Nevada.  It is located on an
11-acre campus at 2900 N. Torrey Pines Drive, just a few blocks off
the I-95 freeway.  In September 2004, Pastor Bruce and Donita
Morris began their time serving Calvary.

Calvary Community Assembly of God filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-13475) on June 28, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Bruce A. Morris, pastor, the Debtor disclosed
$11.04 million in assets and $3.53 million in liabilities.

Angela J. Lizada, Esq., at Lizada Law Firm Ltd., served as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Kavita Gupta was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.


CALVARY COMMUNITY: Trustee Selling Las Vegas Property for $7.75M
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kavita Gupta, the Chapter 11 trustee for Calvary Community Assembly
of God Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Nevada to authorize the sale of the real property located at 2900
North Torrey Pines Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada, identified as located
in the City of Las Vegas, County of Clark, Nevada, Assessor Parcel
Numbers 13814-601-005, 13814-601-006, 13814-601-013, and
13814-601-014, consisting of three buildings totaling +50,552
square feet located on four contiguous parcels of developed and
vacant land totaling +11.220 acres, to Clark County, Nevada for
$7.75 million, subject to any adjustments based upon due diligence
findings.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 24, 2018 at 9:30 a.m.

Prior to the bankruptcy filing, the Debtor's operations consisted
of a church, a church-affiliated school with grades kindergarten
through eighth grade, and a church-affiliated day care facility for
preschool children.  In 2016, it defaulted under a loan in the
amount of $3,403,500 from Assemblies of God Loan Fund, a Missouri
nonprofit corporation, prompting the Debtor to file for bankruptcy
in 2017 to avoid the Lender's foreclosure of the Property while it
attempted to reorganize.  Ultimately, the Debtor failed in its
reorganization efforts, and in 2018, a Chapter 11 Trustee was
appointed over its Estate.

The Trustee retained a realtor to market and to sell the Property,
and in July 2013, the Trustee received from Clark County a written
Conditional Offer to Purchase Real Property for $7.75 million.  The
Trustee asks Court authorization to sell the Property to Clark
County for the sale price of $7.75 million based upon the following
grounds and the following reasons: (1) the Trustee believes that
the proposed sale to the County for $7.75 million is a fair and
reasonable offer that will maximize the Estate and inure to the
benefit of its secured and unsecured creditors, as the proposed
sale price is sufficient to satisfy the secured claims against the
Property, and most likely to satisfy all administrative priority
claims and unsecured creditors' claims asserted against the Estate;
(2) the County timely made its earnest money deposit in the amount
of $50,000 with Fidelity National Title Group on Sept. 4, 2018; (3)
one of the conditions of closing under the Purchase Agreement is
Court approval of the proposed sale; (4) the due diligence period
under the Purchase Agreement ends on Dec. 26, 2018, which is 120
calendar days from the date of execution of the Purchase Agreement;
(5) the deadline for the close of escrow is Jan. 10, 2019, but in
no event later than 15 days after the Due Diligence Period expires;
and (6) the County is the only interested party that has submitted
a formal offer to purchase the Property since the Property has been
listed, and the Clark County Board of Commissioners approved the
proposed sale unanimously during their meeting on Aug. 21, 2018.

A of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/CALVARY_COMMUNITY_274_Sales.pdf

The sale of the Property maximizes value for the creditors of the
Estate.  To the best of the Trustee's knowledge, the sale proceeds
of the proposed sale of the Property to the County will be
sufficient to satisfy in full all of the existing liens encumbering
the Property, including the Lender's Deed of Trust against the
Property, the first DIP Loan, the second DIP Loan, and the third
DIP Loan.  In the event the Court approves the proposed sale to the
County, and in the event the County closes on the sale of the
Property, the Trustee will use the sale proceeds to fund a
liquidating plan of reorganization for an orderly administration of
the case.  Accordingly, the Trustee asks an order authorizing the
proposed sale of the Property to the County free and clear of all
liens and encumbrances.  Any and all valid and perfected Claims in
or to the Property will attach to any cash proceeds.

The Purchaser:

           CLARK COUNTY REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
           Attn: Director
           c/o Robert Tomiyasu
           Real Estate Administrator
           500 South Grand Central Pkwy., 4th Floor
           Las Vegas, NV 89155-1825
           Telephone: (702) 455-4616
                      (702) 455-0110
           Facsimile: (702) 455-5817
           E-mail: Robert.tomiyasu@clarkcountynv.gov

The Purchaser is represented by:

           Mary-Anne Miller, Esq.
           County Counsel
           Civil Division
           500 South Grand Central Pkwy., 5th Floor
           Telephone: (702) 455-4761
           E-mail:maryanne.miIler@c]arkcountyda.com

The Broker:
           Thomas Olson
           DOUGLAS WILSON COS.
           1620 Fifth Ave., Suite 400
           San Diego, CA 92101
           E-mail: tolson@douglaswilson.com

                    About Calvary Community
                        Assembly of God

Calvary Community Assembly of God -- http://www.ccalv.org/-- is a
Pentecostal church in Las Vegas, Nevada.  It is located on an
11-acre campus at 2900 N. Torrey Pines Drive, just a few blocks off
the I-95 freeway.  In September 2004, Pastor Bruce and Donita
Morris began their time serving Calvary.

Calvary Community Assembly of God filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-13475) on June 28, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Bruce A. Morris, pastor, the Debtor disclosed
$11.04 million in assets and $3.53 million in liabilities.

Angela J. Lizada, Esq., at Lizada Law Firm Ltd., served as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Kavita Gupta was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.


CANBRIAM ENERGY: Moody's Lowers CFR to B3, Outlook Negative
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Canbriam Energy Inc.'s
Corporate Family Rating to B3 from B2, Probability of Default
Rating to B3-PD from B2-PD, and US$350 million senior unsecured
notes rating to Caa1 from B3. Canbriam's outlook was changed from
rating under review to negative. This concludes the review for
downgrade that was initiated on August 3, 2018.

"The downgrade reflects Canbriam's weak liquidity driven by the
note maturity in November 2019 that Moody's expects will not be
refinanced before they become current", said Paresh Chari VP --
Senior Analyst.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Canbriam Energy Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B3-PD from B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B3 from B2

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to Caa1 (LGD5)
from B3 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Canbriam Energy Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Negative From Rating Under Review

RATING RATIONALE

Canbriam (B3 CFR) is challenged by: 1) its weak liquidity position
that is driven by its revolver maturing in April 2019 and senior
notes maturing in November 2019; 2) high exposure to weak western
Canadian natural gas prices, favorable hedges rolling off in 2018
and a lack of hedges in 2019 that will weaken margins; 3) a weak
leveraged full-cycle ratio (LFCR) of less than 1x in 2018 and 2019;
and 4) geographic concentration in the Montney formation in
northeast British Columbia. The company is supported by: 1) a
sizeable reserves and production base (38,000 boe/d (barrel of oil
equivalent per day) expected in 2018); 2) low sustaining capital
spending that supports around break even free cash flow in 2019;
and 3) strong expected retained cash flow to debt (about 20%) and
EBITDA to interest (about 3x) in 2019 assuming the US$350 million
note maturing in November 2019 is refinanced.

Canbriam's liquidity is weak. At June 30, 2018 and pro forma for
the July 2018 non-core asset sale of C$50 million, Canbriam will
have about C$58 million of cash and C$130 million due April 30,
2019 under its C$350 million borrowing base revolver and a US$350
million senior unsecured note maturity on November 15, 2019. The
company has no financial covenants. Alternate liquidity is limited
as assets are pledged as collateral to the secured revolving credit
facility, however the company's midstream assets could provide a
potential source of liquidity.

In accordance with Moody's Loss Given Default (LGD) Methodology,
the US$350 million senior unsecured notes are rated Caa1, one notch
below the B3 CFR, due to the priority ranking of the C$350 million
secured borrowing base revolving credit facility.

The negative outlook reflects the significant upcoming debt
maturities in 2019 that Canbriam may not be able to refinance or
extend.

The ratings could be upgraded if the senior notes are refinanced
and the revolver maturity extended such that liquidity would be at
least adequate, retained cash flow to debt is above 20% and the
LFCR is above 1x.

The ratings could be downgraded if Moody's believes that there is
not a sufficient plan in place by early 2019 to refinance or repay
the November 2019 senior unsecured note maturity or extend the
revolver maturity.

Canbriam Energy Inc. is a private Calgary, Alberta-based
independent exploration and production company focused in the
Montney formation in northeastern British Columbia with (net of
royalties) production at about 38,000 boe/d in Q2 2018 (82% natural
gas).

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.


CAPITOL STATION 65: Sets Sale Procedures for All Assets
-------------------------------------------------------
Capitol Station 65, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California to
authorize the sale procedures in connection with the sale of
substantially all assets at auction.

The Debtors own the Township Nine project consisting of 65 acres of
undeveloped land, bound by North 5th Street on the west, North 7th
Street on the east, Richards Boulevard on the south and the
American River on the north.  Township Nine contains approximately
25 parcels and offers the benefits of a master planned community
within the fabric of the downtown area.  It includes approximately
31.62 net developable acres.

The Township Nine project is fully entitled and the second phase of
infrastructure (streets, parks, etc.) is substantially complete.
It was entitled in 2007, with the tentative map amended in 2010 and
again in 2017.  The master plan accommodates sales to individual
developers to pursue development projects consistent with existing
entitlements.

Township Nine is a mixed-use, transit-oriented development that
includes high-density rental units and for-sale housing, retail and
office space, open space, trails, and parks.  Its plans allow up to
2,201 residential units, 840,000 square feet of office space and
150,000 square feet of retail space.  The development is light rail
accessible, with a constructed stop on the Green Line.  It also has
27 acres of parks and open space and includes extensive footage
along the American River and Twin Rivers Bike Trail.

After considering extensive expert testimony and other evidence, on
Jan. 8, 2018, the Court issued a memorandum and order determining
the "as is" market value of the Property, as of Oct. 2, 2017, with
fee credits and less the adjusted net costs to complete the
remaining infrastructure, to be $75,626,874.

Shortly after the Petition Date, the Debtors entered into a
purchase and sale agreement with Anthem United Homes, Inc., dated
July 25, 2017, for the sale of the Property.  The Anthem PSA was
incorporated into the Debtors' Second Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization (dated Oct. 17, 2017).  The Court approved the
Disclosure Statement for the Plan, and the Plan was submitted to
the creditors for a vote, which was completed on Nov. 30, 2017.
Between November 15th and 29th, Secured Creditor Township Nine
Avenue, LLC, formerly known as COPIA Lending, LLC, attempted to
purchase all claims by other creditors to block the confirmation of
the Plan. The hearing to approve the Plan was scheduled for Feb. 7,
2018.

On Jan. 5, 2018, COPIA filed a Motion for Relief from the Automatic
Stay and noticed it to be heard concurrently with the Confirmation
Hearing on Feb. 7, 2018.  In the week of Jan. 22, 2018, Anthem
informed the Debtors that Anthem was not intending to perform under
the terms of the Anthem PSA and was considering terminating it.

In light of this, the Debtors asked that the Court continues the
Confirmation Hearing pending an investigation of the viability of
the Anthem PSA with Anthem, or a third party.  COPIA and the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors stipulated to the
requested continuance.  The Court granted the request and continued
the Confirmation Hearing to June 27-28, 2018.

In late February 2018, Anthem confirmed to the Debtors that it
would not move forward with the Anthem PSA but would assist the
assignment of its interest in the Anthem PSA to a thirdparty.  On
April 23, 2018, Anthem and the Debtors entered into an assignment
agreement whereby Anthem assigned its rights and obligations under
the Anthem PSA to Evergreen Communities Inc.

On June 1, 2018, the Debtors brought a motion to approve the
Evergreen Assignment.  In mid-June, the corporate owners of the
Debtors sold their ownership interests in the Debtors to Gadsden
Growth Properties, Inc.  The Assignment Motion was heard by the
Court on June 26, 2018.  The Court denied the Assignment Motion and
took the confirmation hearing on the Debtors' Plan off calendar.

The trailing Stay Motion was continued, and an Order to Show Cause
("OSC") was issued regarding the termination of plan exclusivity
and the potential appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee.  On July 31,
2018, the Court held hearings on the OSC and Stay Motion.  With
respect to the OSC, the Court terminated exclusivity and discharged
the OSC with respect to appointing a Chapter 11 trustee.  The Court
continued the Stay Motion to Aug. 14, 2018.

COPIA has, by now, purchased most of the remaining claims in these
consolidated cases.  On July 10, 2018, the members of the Committee
resigned in order to allow them to accept COPIA's offer to purchase
their claims.  The Office of the United States Trustee has not
reconstituted the Committee.  The case has become, in essence, a
dispute between the Debtors and COPIA.

On Aug. 9, 2018, the Debtors and COPIA entered into a stipulation
under which the Debtors agreed, among other things, to consummate a
sale of the Property in an amount sufficient to pay off the secured
claim of COPIA and the DIP Loan by Jan. 31, 2019.  In the event
that the Debtors fail to meet that deadline, or other milestones
set forth in the Stipulation, COPIA will have relief from the
automatic stay to pursue the foreclosure of the Property.  The
Court approved the Stipulation on Aug. 30, 2018.

The Debtors have worked with their court-approved brokers to
develop a marketing plan to meet the deadlines provided in the
Stipulation.  The Stipulation has two separate performance
deadlines for the Debtors.  First, the Debtors must open an escrow
by Nov. 30, 2018 for the sale of the Property, or a portion thereof
sufficient to pay the secured claims.  Second, they must pay
COPIA's secured claim in full1 on or before Jan. 31, 2019.
Significant portions of this marketing plan have been implemented
and potential buyers are actively engaged.  Thus, the Debtors ask
an order approving the timeline and procedures for consummating a
sale within the timeframe contemplated under the Stipulation.

The Debtors ask that the Court approves the Sale Procedures as
reasonable and necessary under the circumstances.  They submit that
the Sale Procedures described herein will facilitate the
consummation of an orderly sale, as well as maximize the value of
the assets for their substantively consolidated Chapter 11 estate.

Subject to the additional notice requirements set forth below, the
Debtors ask that the Court sets a Sale Hearing for Jan. 11, 2019.
At the Sale Hearing, they'll ask approval of the Sale of the
Property to either the successful bidder at Auction or a buyer
under the Private Sale Option.  They may also ask an order
approving the assumption and assignment of any executory contracts
designated as part of the proposed Asset Purchase Agreement.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Nov. 15, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (PST)

     b. Initial Bid: The offer must expressly state that the
bidder's offer is all cash, on an as-is, where-is basis, without
contingencies, and irrevocable during the Irrevocability Period.
Any initial overbid of the Stalking Horse Bid must be in an amount
that is greater than or equal to the sum of all consideration
provided by the Stalking Horse Bid (including cash purchase price,
assumed liabilities and any other consideration) plus the Break Up
Fee.

     c. Deposit: $2 million made payable to Placer Title Co., Attn:
Jenny Vega, 2901 “K” Street, Suite 390, Sacramento, California.
The Debtors will return the deposit made by each Qualified Bidder
within fivebusiness days of exercising its right to sell at a
Private Sale, except for the Deposit of the Private Sale buyer.

     d. Auction: The Auction will be conducted at the Sale
Hearing.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Jan. 11, 2019

     g. Closing: The Sale, whether by Auction or Private Sale
Transaction, will close on or before the date which is five
business days following the entry of the Court's order approving
the Sale.

     h. Sale Objection Deadline: Any objections by a
party-in-interest to the proposed Sale must be filed and served on
or before three weeks prior to the Sale Hearing Date.  Any reply by
the Debtors to any objection must be filed on or before one week
prior to the Sale Hearing Date.

These bidding procedures will be without prejudice to the rights of
COPIA to make a credit bid in combination with or without a
non-credit bid.

At any time on or before Nov. 30, 2018, the Debtors may accept an
offer or bid as a stalking horse bid from a Qualified Bidder.  The
Stalking Horse Bid will be subject to the Debtors' right to accept
a higher and better bid at an auction conducted pursuant to the
terms of the Bidding and Sale Procedures.

In the event the Stalking Horse Bidder is not the successful bidder
approved by the Court at the Sale Hearing, the Stalking Horse
Bidder will be entitled to payment of 1.5% of the Stalking Horse
Bid payable from the proceeds at closing of the sale to the
successful third party bidder.

On Nov. 30, 2018, the Debtors will file with the Court the Sale
Motion.  In the event that the Debtors elect to consummate the Sale
through a Private Sale, they reserve the right to request that the
Court re-set the Sale Hearing Date to an earlier date.  Any
objections by a party-in-interest to the proposed Sale must be
filed and served on or before three weeks prior to the Sale Hearing
Date. Any reply by the Debtors to any objection must be filed on or
before one week prior to the Sale Hearing Date.

The Debtors ask the Court to (i) approve the Sale Procedures as
outlined; (ii) schedule a hearing to consider approval of the Sale,
and the assumption and assignment of the Assigned Agreements for a
date on Jan. 11, 2019; and (ii) approve the Breakup Fee and
determining that in the event the obligation of the Debtors to pay
the Breakup Fee arises, such obligation will be paid solely from
the purchase price paid by the Successful Bidder as a
super-priority claim.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 23, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

                    About Capitol Station 65

Capitol Station 65 LLC, Capitol Station Holdings LLC, Capitol
Station Member LLC, and Township Nine Owners LLC sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case Nos.
17-23627 to 17-23630) on May 30, 2017.  In the petitions signed by
CEO Suneet Singal, the Debtors estimated their assets at $50
million to $100 million and debt at $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Christopher D. Jaime presides over the cases.  

Nuti Hart LLP is the Debtors' legal counsel.

On July 20, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee hired
Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP, as counsel.

On Aug. 28, 2017, the Debtors filed a disclosure statement and a
joint Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.


CARDEL MASTER: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Cardel Master Builder, Inc.
        9110 E Nichols Ave, Suite 120
        Centennial, CO 80112

Business Description: Cardel Master Builder is a privately
                      held building contractor in Centennial,
                      Colorado.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 12, 2018

Case No.: 18-18945

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Colorado (Denver)

Judge: Hon. Thomas B. McNamara

Debtor's Counsel: Brian J. Fletcher, Esq.
                  ONSAGER | FLETCHER | JOHNSON LLC
                  1801 Broadway, Ste. 900
                  Denver, CO 80202
                  Tel: 303-512-1123
                  Fax: 303-512-1129
                  E-mail: jbfletcher@OFJlaw.com

                     - and -

                  Christian C. Onsager, Esq.
                  ONSAGER | FLETCHER | JOHNSON LLC
                  1801 Broadway, Ste. 900
                  Denver, CO 80202
                  Tel: 303-512-1123
                  E-mail: consager@OFJlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Roderick Mickelberry, regional
president, Carden Master Builder, Inc., G.P. of Cardel Clocktower,
L.P.

A copy of the Debtor's list of five unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob18-18945_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob18-18945.pdf


CARITAS INVESTMENT: Court Reduces B&G Marina Claim to $15K
----------------------------------------------------------
Caritas Investment Limited Partnership filed a Fourth Amended
Disclosure Statement disclosing that the Debtor on or about Sept.
15, 2018, paid $127,049 for 2017 taxes due to the Internal Revenue
Service and $23,412 for 2017 taxes due to the state revenue
service. The Debtor also disclosed that it objected to the proof of
claim of B&G Marina.  The Court reduced the claim to $15,248.

A copy of the Fourth Amended Disclosure Statement from
PacerMonitor.com is available at https://tinyurl.com/ybzhjkdp at no
charge.

                     About Caritas Investment

Headquartered at Stamford, Connecticut, Caritas Investment Limited
Partnership is a single asset real estate as defined in 11 U.S.C.
Section 101(51B).  It owns the property at 140 Wallacks Drive,
Stamford, which consists of a parcel on Stamford mainland and an
island in the City of Stamford.

Caritas Investment Limited Partnership filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 17-50456) on April 24, 2017.  In its
petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both
assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by John A. Morgan,
member of Morgan 2000, LLC, general partner.



CAROL ROSE: Seeks 60-Day Exclusive Solicitation Period Extension
----------------------------------------------------------------
Carol Rose, Inc., and Carol Alison Ramsay Rose request the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas to extend for at
least 60 days (a) the period during which the Debtors have the
exclusive right to solicit acceptances in connection with the Plan,
and (b) the dates and deadlines relating to the approval of the
Debtors' Disclosure Statement and Confirmation of the Debtors'
Plan.

On Jan. 16, 2018, the Debtors filed their Joint Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization and on Jan. 22, they filed their Joint Disclosure
Statement in Support of the Plan.  The current deadline for Carol
Rose and Rose Inc. to solicit acceptance of their Plan is March 17,
2018 and March 18, 2018, respectively.

The Debtors jointly removed certain state court litigation, to
namely: (a) Carol Rose and Carol Rose, Inc. v. Lori Aaron, Phillip
Aaron, Aaron Ranch and Jay McLaughlin, filed in the 235th Judicial
District in Cooke County, Texas docketed as Cause No. 13-00535; and
(b) Equis Equine, LLC and Elizabeth Weston v. Carol Rose, Carol
Rose, Inc. d/b/a Carol Rose Quarter Horses d/b/a Carol Rose Ranch
d/b/a Carol Rose Dispersal Sale, Lewis T. Stevens, Don Green,
Harold Brown, Aaron Ranch, Aaron's Ranch, Inc., Lori Aaron and
Phillip Aaron, filed in the 235th Judicial District in Cooke
County, Texas docketed as Cause No. 15-00481.

In addition, Elizabeth Weston and Equis Equine, LLC filed a
complaint objecting to the dischargeability of the alleged
indebtedness owed by Rose, Adv. Proc. No. 17-04131. Likewise, the
Aaron Parties filed a complaint objecting to the dischargeability
of the alleged indebtedness of Rose to the Aaron Parties, Adv.
Proc. No. 18-04016. The Debtors have also filed objections to the
claims of the Aaron parties and the Weston parties.

As set forth in the Debtors' Disclosure Statement, the outcome of
the Litigation will fundamentally shape the Debtors' Plan. Class 3
of the Plan consists solely of the allowed Aaron Unsecured Claims,
if any and Class 4 of the Plan consists solely of the allowed
Weston Unsecured Claims, if any. The claims in both Class 3 and
Class 4 are heavily disputed by the Debtors and the Debtors seek
recovery of substantial claims against the Aarons, as well as full
disallowance of the Disputed Unsecured Claims.

Given the significance of resolution of the Litigation to Debtors'
formulation and confirmation of the Plan, Debtors sought extension
of exclusivity until after trial and entry of a final judgment
adjudicating the various claims. Subsequently, the Court granted
the Debtors' request in part and scheduled a hearing on the
Disclosure Statement on August 28, 2018, and extended the
Solicitation Period until October 29, 2018.

Although a trial on the Litigation took place on May 29 through
June 1, 2018 and June 11 through June 15, and the Court heard
closing arguments from counsel for the parties in the Litigation on
July 6, the Court has not yet entered a final judgment with respect
to the Litigation.

Subsequently, the Debtors filed their Second Motion seeking to
further extend the various dates and deadlines. Pursuant to the
Court's Second Order, the hearing on the Disclosure Statement is
continued until October 23, 2018 at 2:00 p.m., setting an objection
deadline for October 16, and extended the Solicitation Period Until
December 28, 2018.  

Based on the foregoing, the Debtors now file their Third Motion
requesting further extension of the exclusivity period and all
related deadlines for at least 60 days dependent upon the Court's
calendar. The Debtors believe that such an extension is warranted
given the significance of the Court's anticipated ruling and the
impact it will have on all aspects of the Debtors' Plan. The
Debtors believe that an extension of 60 days will afford them
sufficient time after the Court's ruling in the Litigation to
solicit and seek confirmation of a plan.

                       About Carol Rose

Carol Rose, Inc. -- http://www.carolrose.com/-- owns a horse
breeding facility in Gainesville, Texas.  It provides on-site
breeding, cooled semen, embryo transfer, mare care and maintenance
and foaling services.  It is owned by Carol Rose, a National Reined
Cow Horse Association (NRCHA) and National Reining Horse
Association (NRHA) breeder. Ms. Rose is the sole director and
shareholder of the Debtor.

Carol Rose, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 17-42058) on Sept. 19,
2017.  In the petition signed by owner Carol Rose, the Debtor
estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of
less than $500,000.

Judge Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the case.  

Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The
Debtor tapped Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP/Kelly Hart & Pitre as its
special counsel.


CEDAR FAIR: Egan-Jones Lowers Senior Unsecured Ratings to BB-
-------------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on October 1, 2018, downgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by Cedar Fair LP to BB- from BB.

Cedar Fair, L.P., doing business as the Cedar Fair Entertainment
Company, is a publicly traded partnership headquartered at its
Cedar Point amusement park in Sandusky, Ohio, with other corporate
offices in Charlotte, North Carolina.



CLEARWAY ENERGY: Moody's Affirms Ba2 CFR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Clearway Energy, Inc.'s Ba2
Corporate Family Rating and Clearway Energy Operating LLC's Ba2
senior unsecured rating. At the same time, Moody's affirmed
Clearway Energy's speculative grade liquidity rating at SGL-2. In
addition, in this rating action, Moody's is correcting the issuer
attribution for the Ba2 senior unsecured debt to reflect the
appropriate issuing legal entity, which should be Clearway Energy
Operating LLC rather than Clearway Energy, Inc.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Clearway Energy Operating LLC

Outlook, Remains Stable

Issuer: Clearway Energy, Inc.

Outlook, Remains Stable

Affirmations:

Issuer: Clearway Energy Operating LLC

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed Ba2 (LGD4)

Issuer: Clearway Energy, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-2

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba2

RATINGS RATIONALE

Clearway Energy's credit quality reflects its low business risk
profile and the size and diversity of its portfolio. Cash flow
diversity is strong, with approximately 125 project assets and a
mix of renewable, gas and thermal assets. There is, however, some
geographic concentration, as about 70% of cash flows are generated
from projects in California.

Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) recently acquired NRG Energy
Inc.'s interest in NRG Yield, Inc. and renamed the company Clearway
Energy, Inc. The acquisition was made through GIP's subsidiary,
Clearway Energy Group.

Moody's considers GIP to be a strong sponsor for Clearway Energy
and Clearway Energy Group due to its large fund size and expertise
in the infrastructure sector. Clearway Group has a strong pipeline
of projects to support drop downs to Clearway Energy. Clearway
Group currently has 8.9 gigawatts of development projects it
acquired from NRG and SunPower Corporation. About 1 gigawatt of the
development projects is in late stage development.

Offsetting these credit strengths are leverage ratios that will
remain high. Moody's projects the ratio of consolidated debt to
EBITDA to be around 6x to 7x while CFO Pre-WC/consolidated debt to
be around 9%, both of which ratios are calculated on a P90 basis.
The leverage ratios for full year results for 2018 are likely to be
slightly above its run rate ratios because of the timing of the
Carlsbad acquisition, which is expected to occur towards the end of
2018.

Liquidity

Clearway Energy has good liquidity, as reflected in its SGL-2
speculative grade liquidity rating. It has only a modest amount of
capital expenditures in the near term and Moody's expects it will
generate a strong free cash flow in 2018 and 2019, of about $300
million per year. Additionally, as of June 30, 2018, the company
had $130 million of unrestricted cash on hand and a $495 million
revolving credit facility with $428 million unused.

Clearway Energy's revolving credit facility is sized to accommodate
both operational liquidity and also provide bridge funding for new
acquisitions.

The revolving credit facility expires in April 2023 and contains a
material adverse change clause for new borrowings. Financial
covenants include corporate debt to corporate EBITDA of 5.5x and
interest coverage of 1.75x. Clearway Energy recorded a debt to
EBITDA of 3.7x and an interest coverage of 5.3x as of the second
quarter of 2018 for compliance certificate purposes.

Rating Outlook

Clearway Energy's stable outlook reflects its projected consistent
cash flow and the diversity among individual projects. The stable
outlook incorporates its expectation that Clearway Energy will
finance these acquisitions in a way that does not significantly
increase leverage or worsen liquidity.

Factors that Could Lead to an Upgrade

Moody's may take positive rating action on Clearway Energy and
Clearway Operating should Clearway Energy's CFO Pre-WC to
consolidated debt rise to the mid-teens or should consolidated debt
to EBITDA fall to 5.5x or below.

Factors that Could Lead to a Downgrade

A negative rating action could occur should the company's
consolidated debt to EBITDA be sustained at above 7.5x, or if CFO
Pre-W/C to consolidated debt fall below 9%, or if the cash flow
from its projects proves to be more volatile or less resilient than
its expectations. A downgrade can also occur should the company
modify its financing strategy in a way that hurts credit quality,
such as by using additional leverage to finance growth.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Unregulated
Utilities and Unregulated Power Companies published in May 2017.


CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC: Moody's Hikes CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Cleveland-Cliffs Inc's Corporate
Family Rating and Probability of Default Rating to B1 and B1-PD
from B2 and B2-PD respectively. The senior secured guaranteed notes
were upgraded to Ba2 from Ba3, the senior unsecured guaranteed
notes were upgraded to B1 from B2 and the senior unsecured notes
were upgraded to B3 from Caa1. The speculative grade liquidity
rating was upgraded to SGL-1 from SGL-2. The outlook is stable.

"The upgrade reflects the improving trends evidenced, which are
expected to hold, in Cliffs performance on strengthened
fundamentals in the US steel industry, the dominant market for
Cliffs iron ore pellets together with strength in pellet premium
prices and relatively stable iron ore prices" said Carol Cowan,
Moody's Senior Vice President and lead analyst for Cliffs.

Upgrades:

Issuer: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B1-PD from B2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Upgraded to SGL-1 from SGL-2

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B1 from B2

Guaranteed Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Upgraded to Ba2
(LGD2) from Ba3 (LGD2)

Guaranteed Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Upgraded to B1
(LGD4) from B2 (LGD3)

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debentures, Upgraded to B3 (LGD5)
from Caa1 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B1 CFR reflects Cliffs improved operating performance,
strengthened debt protection metrics, focus on debt reduction and
strong position in the North American iron ore markets. The rating
also considers the contract nature of the company's iron ore
operations and the symbiotic relationship with US blast furnace
steel mills. Improved fundamentals in the US steel industry on
strengthened demand across many end markets as well as the impact
of the Section 232 tariffs and quotas has contributed to improved
utilization by the industry as well as significant increases in
hot-rolled coil prices. This is impactful in that the ArcelorMittal
contract contains a pricing adjustment for hot-rolled coil steel,
among other factors. For the six months through June 30, 2018,
hot-rolled coil steel prices have averaged $821/ton versus $621/ton
in 2017. Although prices have trended down from their peak of
around $910/ton in the late June/early July time frame, prices are
expected to remain resilient on strong demand levels. Moody's
expects leverage, as measured by the debt/EBITDA ratio to improve
to around 3.5x at year-end 2018 from 4.9x for the twelve months
through June 30, 2018. The favorable conditions are expected to
hold in 2019 enabling Cliffs to continue to have strong cash flow
generation and internally fund the construction of the $700 million
hot-briquetted iron (HBI) production plant, which is expected to
start-up in mid-2020.

However, the rating incorporates the volatility in iron ore, pellet
premium and hot-rolled coil prices as well as volatility in the
performance of Cliffs end customer base. Additionally, the single
commodity nature of the business and customer concentration is a
limiting factor in the rating. The rating also considers the
seasonality in the business profile and expectations for a weak
first quarter in 2019 relative to the 2nd through 4th quarters in
2018. The execution risk on the construction and start-up of the
HBI facility and lack of committed offtake is also considered in
the rating although these appear manageable and the HBI produced
will be competitive due to freight advantages over imported pig
iron and other forms of iron units.

The SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating is supported by good
cash flow generation expected in 2018, approximately $803 million
in cash at June 30, 2018 (includes proceeds from debt issuance in
December 2017 to support capital requirements for construction of
the HBI facility) and a $450 million ABL, which expires the earlier
of February 28, 2023 or a date that is 60 days prior to the
maturity of existing debt as defined in the ABL. The facility
contains a 1:1 fixed charge coverage requirement should
availability be less than the greater of 10% of the aggregate
facility and $35 million. Given the level of receivables and
inventory, the full commitment was not available and borrowing
capacity at June 30, 2018 was $360.8 million, net of the letters of
credit. With the repayment of the notes due in 2020, the next
maturity is $125 million in 2021.

The stable outlook reflects its expectation that Cliffs will
continue to evidence acceptable earnings and debt protection and
leverage metrics over the next twelve to eighteen months even if
iron ore prices were to average in the $60/ton range and hot-rolled
coil prices average around $700/ton. While leverage could spike at
these levels in 2020 coming off the spending for the HBI facility,
the company is expected to still maintain a robust liquidity
position. Its price sensitivity range for seaborne iron ore is
$45-$75/ton with a midpoint of $60/ton. Cliff's price realizations
are based upon contract terms and include a premium for pellets.
The outlook also assumes that conditions in the US steel industry
will remain relatively comparable to those experienced in 2018
allowing for good volume performance for Cliffs. Capacity
utilization in the US steel industry is expected to range between
75 - 80% while hot rolled coil prices are expected to average
between $725 - $775/ton. End market demand conditions are expected
to be comparable although automotive has come off its peak and is
expected to be a bit softer albeit still solid.

The Ba2 rating on the senior secured guaranteed notes, under
Moody's Loss Given Default Methodology, reflects their superior
position in the capital structure and significant level of
unsecured debt beneath the notes. These notes have a 1st lien on
substantially all the assets of Cliffs and the guarantors other
than those securing the ABL, in which they have a 2nd lien. Moody's
limited the up notching to two from the CFR due to the sizeable
debt ahead of the notes and the weaker collateral quality relative
to the ABL. The notes are guaranteed by substantially all domestic
operating subsidiaries. The senior guaranteed unsecured notes (B1)
are guaranteed by the same guarantors on the senior secured notes,
which provides them a slightly more favorable position in the
capital structure relative to the senior unsecured notes. The B3
rating on the senior unsecured notes reflects their junior position
in the capital structure behind the senior secured guaranteed
notes, the senior unsecured guaranteed unsecured notes, the ABL
facility and priority payables. The ABL is primarily secured by
receivables, inventory and certain equipment and has the same
guarantees as the senior secured notes and senior guaranteed
unsecured notes.

Given the capital spending requirements over the next year or so
for the HBI facility and execution and start-up risk, a further
rating upgrade is likely to be more measured. Successful ramp of
the HBI facility and committed offtake would be favorable
considerations. Should the company be able to sustain EBIT/interest
at 4x, debt/EBITDA of no more than 3x and (CFO-Dividends)/debt of
at least 25%, positive rating momentum could develop. Should
liquidity deteriorate beyond what is expected to be used to support
the HBI investment, debt/EBITDA be sustained above 4x or
(CFO-Dividends)/debt be sustained below 15%, the ratings could be
downgraded.

Headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio, Cleveland-Cliffs is the largest
iron ore producer in North America with approximately 21.2 million
equity tons of annual capacity. The reorganization plan for Wabush
and Bloom Lake has been approved by the Canadian courts and this
process is now concluded. The sale of its Asia Pacific assets was
completed in August 2018. For the twelve months ending June 30,
2018 Cliffs had revenues of $2.4 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Mining
published in September 2018.


COBRA WELL: Plan Exclusivity Period Extended Through Nov. 12
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Cathleen D. Parker of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Wyoming, granted Cobra Well Testers, LLC, an extension
of the exclusivity periods for Cobra Well to file a plan of
reorganization and to obtain acceptance of its plan through and
including to Nov. 12, 2018 and Jan. 26, 2019, respectively.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked the Court to extend the expiration of its exclusivity
periods for 45 days, asserting its case presents several unique
complexities given the underlying facts and circumstances that gave
rise to the filing.  As a result, additional time is needed to
prepare adequate information so that creditors will be in a
position to make an informed decision with respect to any proposed
plan of reorganization.

The Debtor represented that it has moved its case forward, and has
already liquidated $300,000 of assets to generate proceeds to pay
down the debt owed to ANB Bank.  The Debtor, however, is still
continuing its settlement negotiations with its two primary
creditors, ANB Bank and the IRS, in connection with cash
collateral, adequate protection, asset sale and relief from stay
issues.  The Debtor believed that the sale of assets and cash
collateral issues, if completed on a consensual basis, will be
critical in assisting the Debtor with formulating and determining
the feasibility of any proposed plan of reorganization. The Debtor
needed additional time to continue negotiations with these
creditors prior to formulating the final terms of its plan of
reorganization.

The Debtor told the Court that it has been diligently working with
its creditors, specifically, ANB Bank and the IRS, in an effort to
reach consensual resolution of matters. The Debtor believed that
some progress has been achieved and continued negotiations could
result in settlement of the pending matters before the Court.

                   About Cobra Well Testers

Cobra Well Testers, LLC, provides high pressure well testing
services to the oil and gas industry.  It was established in 1999
to initially service the Muddy Ridge gas field in Western Wyoming.
Since then, the company has expanded to complete work in
multipleoil and gas basins throughout the Rockies.

Cobra Well Testers sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Wyo. Case No. 18-20449) on May 31, 2018.
In the petition signed by Yavette Bailey, member, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  

Judge Cathleen D. Parker presides over the case.


COLIMA BBQ: Trustee Selling All Business Assets to Kim for $250K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy Yoo, the Chapter 11 trustee for Colima BBQ Inc., asks the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to
authorize the bidding procedures in connection with the sale of all
of the estate's rights in and to the business being operated as
"Red Castle 1," located at 18751 E. Colima Rd., Rowland Heights,
California, pursuant to the Business Purchase Agreement and Joint
Escrow Instructions dated Sept. 17, 2018 and all addendums,
amendments and related agreements thereto, between the Trustee and
Jeong Hye Kim or assignee for $250,000, subject to overbid.

The Business is being operated at the premises pursuant to a
Commercial Lease Agreement between the Debtor and Seoul Colima, LLC
(successor to Colima Park Investments, LLC).  Pursuant to an order
of the Court entered on Aug. 14, 2018, the Lease has been assumed
by the Trustee.

After investigating and operating all of these businesses, the
Trustee has determined that going concern sales of these
restaurants would be the best means of monetizing the highest value
of these estates' assets for the benefit of their creditors.  In
that regard, the Trustee hired Coldwell Banker Commercial Wilshire
Properties to assist the estate in marketing and listing the
Business for sale.

On Sept. 17, 2018, the Trustee, received his second offer of
$250,000 from the Buyer.  The Buyer also promptly delivered a
cashier's check for the deposit of $10,000 and proof of funds to
close.  The offer from the Buyer to purchase the Estate's right,
title and interest in and to the Lease and the Business, including
the Estate's liquor license, all inventory, machinery, equipment,
fixtures, furniture and other personal property situated at the
Business, all in "as is, where is" condition, with no
representation or warranty, but free and clear of all liens and
interests, is an all-cash offer for the sum of $250,000.  The Buyer
has made a $10,000 deposit towards the Purchase Price, and the
balance of the Purchase Price will be due at closing.

There are no contingencies to the sale other than the entry of an
order approving this Motion authorizing the sale of the Property
free and clear of all liens and claims and the assignment of the
Lease, and approval of the transfer of the Business liquor license
from the Debtor to the Buyer (or winning overbidder) by the Alcohol
and Beverage Control.  The closing is to occur immediately upon
approval of the transfer of the liquor license from the Debtor to
the Buyer (or winning overbidder) by the ABC.

Pursuant to the Motion, the Trustee asks authority to sell the
Property to the Buyer, subject to overbid, and in accordance with
the terms and conditions set forth in the BPA.  The sale of the
Property to the Buyer (or winning overbidder) will be free and
clear of all liens or interests, with such liens or interests to
attach to the proceeds of the sale.  The Trustee also asks Court
approval of the Overbid Procedures described in the Motion in
connection with the proposed sale of the Property, which the
Trustee believes will maximize the price ultimately obtained for
the Property and still protect the Estate from parties who may wish
to bid on the Property but who are ultimately unable to consummate
a purchase of the Property.

Since the Estate's interest in and to the Lease is a critical
component of the proposed sale of the Property, pursuant to the
Motion, the Trustee also asks the entry of a Court order approving
the assignment of the Lease to the Buyer or a successful
overbidder.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Oct. 12, 2018 at 12:00 p.m. (PT)

     b. Initial Bid: $255,000

     c. Deposit: $10,000

     d. Bid Increments: $5,000

The Court established July 31, 2018 as the bar date for creditors
to file proofs of claim in the case.  A review of the Court's Claim
Register reveals that there are four creditors which assert
security interests and liens upon the Property and timely filed
proofs of claim.  Each of these creditors, their respective proofs
of claim, and their purported security interests and liens.

The Trustee is not asking any authority in the Motion to disburse
any of the sale proceeds at this time, and the liens and interests
of those creditors asserting liens and interests in and to such
proceeds will attach to such proceeds.

The creditors are:

     a. Hana Small Business Lending, Inc. - Hana extended a secured
loan to RH in the principal amount of $240,000 on or about Sept. 5,
2012 pursuant to a Business Loan Agreement, Note, Commercial
Security Agreement and related agreements.

     b. Bank of Hope, successor to BBCN Bank: On Sept. 27, 2013,
Bank of Hope provided a construction loan to Onesan, LLC and
Onebada, as co-borrowers, in the original principal sum of
$3,521,000.  Park is the sole member of Onesan.  The real estate
owned by Onesan (which is now controlled by Elissa Miller as the
Chapter 11 trustee of the Park bankruptcy estate) and the Bulgogi
House restaurant operated by Onebada are currently listed for sale
for $4.6 million (real estate), and $900,000 (restaurant),
respectively.

     c. Quentin Meats: Quentin was a supplier of meats to the
Debtor.  Quentin recorded a UCC-1 financing statement that covers
substantially all of the Debtor's assets with the California
Secretary of State’s Office on March 24, 2017.

     d. Timberland Bank: Timberland filed a proof of claim (Claim
4-1) on May 9, 2018 asserting a total claim of $83,960, claiming
that $10,000 is secured and the balance unsecured.

It is the Trustee's belief that Hana, Bank of Hope, Quentin Meats,
nor Timberland Bank do not have perfected or enforceable liens upon
the estate's leasehold rights and liquor license; therefore, in
connection with the continued investigation and objection to the
allowance and/or payment of the secured claims asserted by these
creditors, the estate reserves its rights fully to argue that the
scope of their purported liens do not extend to the proceeds of
these assets.

To facilitate the most expeditious sale closing possible, the
Trustee asks that the order granting the Motion be effective
immediately upon entry by providing that the 14-day stay periods
provided by Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) and 6006(d) are waived.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 17, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Colima_BBQ_132_Sales.pdf

                       About Colima BBQ

Colima BBQ, Inc., operates a Korean barbeque restaurant doing
business as "Red Castle 1" located at 18751 E. Colima Road, Rowland
Heights, California.  

Colima BBQ filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code on Jan. 26, 2018.  Following a hearing on April 6,
2018, the case was converted to one under Chapter 11 (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 18-10888).  

Timothy J. Yoo was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.
The Trustee hired Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill LLP as his
legal counsel.


CONNEAUT LAKE PARK: Bankr. Court Dismisses Park Restoration's SAC
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The adversary proceeding captioned ARK RESTORATION, LLC, Plaintiff,
v. TRUSTEES OF CONNEAUT LAKE PARK, INC., Defendant, Adversary No.
18-1024-JAD (Bankr. W.D. Pa.) is the latest installment of an
ongoing feud between Park Restoration, LLC and the Trustees of
Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. Because the claims or causes of action
asserted by Park Restoration fail as a matter of law, Bankruptcy
Judge Jeffery A. Deller grants TCLP's motion to dismiss Park
Restoration's Second Amended Complaint.

In this adversary proceeding, Park Restoration is seeking to assert
(by way of subrogation) a $478,260.75 secured tax claim against
TCLP. Park Restoration is asserting its claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
section 509 because such claims of the taxing authorities were
previously paid during the pendency of the case from proceeds of a
fire insurance policy obtained by Park Restoration.

As averred by Park Restoration, Park Restoration is not the party
liable for payment of the property taxes--as it is not the property
owner.9 In fact, the record reflects that Erie Insurance (and not
Park Restoration) became the party responsible for payment pursuant
to the State Statute because the State Statute only requires
payment from the insurance proceeds. Moreover, Park Restoration
does not aver that (if the insurance proceeds were insufficient to
satisfy the tax delinquency) Park Restoration would be personally
liable for the deficiency. And, the Court does not find as much. As
noted by both this Court and the Third Circuit, the State Statute
creates an in rem interest versus an in personam liability which
attaches to all fire insurance proceeds for the property.

As it has been determined that Park Restoration did not have a
vested property interest in the insurance proceeds remitted by Erie
Insurance, Park Restoration's own personal property has not been
used to satisfy the tax obligation nor does it appear that it would
be so required in the event that the insurance proceeds failed to
satisfy the Secured Tax Claims. Thus, Park Restoration appears to
have no true co-liability for the taxes in its own sense. These
circumstances are also fatal to Park Restoration's subrogation
demands.

As Park Restoration was neither a payor of, nor co-liable on, the
Secured Tax Claims as contemplated by 11 U.S.C. section 509, Park
Restoration has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted and dismissal of the Amended Complaint is warranted.

A copy of the Court’'s Memorandum Opinion dated Sept. 28, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2A94PQW from Leagle.com.

Park Restoration, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by John F. Mizner --
jfm@miznerfirm.com-- Mizner Law Firm.

Trustees of Conneaut Lake Park, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Jeanne S. Lofgren -- jlofgren@stonecipherlaw.com -- Stonecipher Law
Firm.

                 About Conneaut Lake Park

Trustees of Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. is a Pennsylvania non-profit
corporation organized in 1997 and having the corporate purpose,
among other things, to preserve and maintain Conneaut Lake Park, a
vintage amusement park located in Conneaut Lake, Pennsylvania, for
historical, cultural, social and recreational, and civic purposes
for the benefit of the community and the general public.  It
presently holds in trust for the use of the general public
approximately 207 acres of land and the improvements thereon
located in Crawford County, Pennsylvania.

Trustees of Conneaut Lake Park, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 14-11277) in Erie, Pennsylvania,
on Dec. 4, 2014.  The case is assigned to Judge Thomas P. Agresti.

The Debtor estimated assets and debt of $1 million to $10 million.

Trustees of Conneaut Lake Park filed for bankruptcy protection less
than 20 hours before the Crawford County amusement park was
scheduled to go to sheriff's sale for almost $930,000 in back taxes
and related fees.

The Debtor tapped George T. Snyder, Esq., at Stonecipher Law Firm,
in Pittsburgh, as counsel.

Passport Realty, LLC was appointed by the Court as Broker on July
31, 2015.

On Sept. 6, 2016, the Court entered a final order approving the
Disclosure Statement and confirming the Reorganized Debtor's Joint
Amended Plan of Reorganization.


CONSIS INTERNATIONAL: Taps Weiss Serota as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Consis International LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to hire Weiss Serota
Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's partners charge an hourly fee of $425.  The hourly rates
for associates range from $200 to $350.

Aleida Martinez Molina, Esq., a partner at Weiss Serota, disclosed
in a court filing that the firm is "disinterested" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Weiss Serota can be reached through:

     Aleida Martinez Molina, Esq.
     Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L.
     2525 Ponce de Leon #700
     Coral Gables, FL 33134
     Tel: 305-854-0800
     Email: amartinez@wsh-law.com

                  About Consis International

Consis International LLC -- https://www.consisint.com/ -–
provides computer systems design and related services.  It was
founded in August 1987 in Caracas, Venezuela.

Consis International sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-22233) on Oct. 2,
2018.  In the petition signed by Oscar Carrera, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge John K. Olson presides over the
case.


CONSOLIDATED MFG: Shelley Buying 2015 H&H Cargo Trailer for $3K
---------------------------------------------------------------
Consolidated Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc., ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Wyoming to authorize the
private sale of a 2015 H&H Cargo Trailer, 8x16' enclosed, VIN #
533TC1628FC41036, two wheel pull trailer, to Jeff Shelley for
$3,000.

The Debtor proposes to sell the enclosed trailer for which it has
no real current use or need, for the price of $3,000 to an
unrelated party, the Buyer.  The sale will be free and clear of
liens as there are no liens recorded on the Debtor's title for this
over the road vehicle.  The Debtor does not perceive any
disadvantages to the estate as a result of the proposed sale.  The
estate may incur federal tax liability based upon the Debtor's
basis but will still net significant proceeds.

The terms of sale are all cash and no financing by the Debtor is
required.  It will incur no sales commission or other closing costs
in connection with the transaction.  It has not made, nor will he
make, any representations or warranties regarding the condition of
the property, its area, quality, or character.  The Trustee will
disclaim any express or implied warranties.  The sale will take
place on or after the expiration of the notice period.

The objection deadline is Oct. 15, 2018.

           About Consolidated Manufacturing Enterprises

Founded in 2002, Consolidated Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. --
http://www.cmewy.com/-- offers welding, fabrication, oilfield and
pipeline services to a variety of industrial, commercial, small and
large businesses and individuals.  It is headquartered in
Wheatland, Wyoming.

Consolidated Manufacturing Enterprises sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Wyo. Case No.
18-20347) on April 30, 2018.  In the petition signed by Elias J.
Stone, president, the Debtor disclosed $3.11 million in assets and
$1.93 million in liabilities.  Judge Cathleen D. Parker presides
over the case.


COPPER CANYON: Case Summary & 17 Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Copper Canyon Partners LLC
        1117 L Street
        Modesto, CA 95354

Business Description: Copper Canyon Partners LLC is a contractor
                      in Modesto, California.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 11, 2018

Case No.: 18-51144

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nevada (Reno)

Debtor's Counsel: Stephen R. Harris, Esq.
                  HARRIS LAW PRACTICE LLC
                  6151 Lakeside DR, Ste 2100
                  Reno, NV 89511
                  Tel: (775) 786-7600
                  Fax: (775) 786-7764
                  E-mail: steve@harrislawreno.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Phillip Kirk DeLaMare, DeLaMare Family
Investments No. 1, L.P., managing member.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb18-51144.pdf

List of Debtor's 17 Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
DeLaMare Family                                          $303,791
Investments, No. 1, LP
1117 L Street
Modesto, CA 95354

DeLaMARE Family                                           $49,750
Investments, No. 1., LP

DTOM, LLC                                                 $69,333

Hillard, Joan                                             $42,014

Hoy Chrissinger                Legal Services            $218,781
KIMMEL VALLAS PC

Jensen & Jensen                                            $4,000

Johnson & Associates                                         $200

K.R.K., LLC                      Litigation                    $0

Lewis and Roca, LLP            Legal Services             $20,419

Matthews, Barbara                                         $69,595

Moore Law Group                Legal Services              $6,253

MVE, INC.                                              $2,134,062
1117 L Street
Modesto, CA 95354

MVE, INC                                                 $470,117  
      
1117 L Street
Modesto, CA 95354

Nakamura, Donna                                          $139,233

Scott, Seth W.                     Litigation                  $0

Speer Family Investments No. 1, LP                       $373,333
611 Enslen Avenue
Modesto, CA 95354

Wurth, Mary                                              $297,077
214 W. 9th Street
ONAGA, KS 66521


CPM HOLDINGS: Moody's Gives B3 Corp. Family Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 Corporate Family Rating and
B3-PD Probability of Default Rating to CPM Holdings, Inc. (New).
Concurrently, Moody's assigned a B2 rating to the senior secured
first lien bank credit facilities and a Caa2 to the second lien
term loan. The ratings outlook is stable.

The new loans are being issued as a part of a transaction whereby
American Securities LLC is acquiring CPM in a transaction valued at
about $1.2 billion from Gilbert Global Equity Partners. In addition
to a $515 million senior secured first lien term loan and a $225
million second lien term loan, American Securities LLC will also be
financing the transaction with $490 million of equity. The
transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter.

Assignments:

Issuer: CPM Holdings, Inc. (New)

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B2
(LGD3)

Gtd Senior Secured Second Lien Bank Credit Facility, Assigned Caa2
(LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: CPM Holdings, Inc. (New)

Outlook, Assigned Stable

The ratings assigned are subject to receipt and review of final
documentation.

The following ratings remain unchanged and will be withdrawn upon
closing of the transaction and the repayment in full of the
existing bank credit facilities.

Issuer: CPM Holdings, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating of B2

Probability of Default Rating at B2-PD

Senior secured first lien revolving credit facility at B1 (LGD3)

Senior secured first lien term loan at B1 (LGD3)

Senior secured second lien term loan at Caa1 (LGD5)

Outlook, at Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

CPM's B3 CFR is constrained by the elevated financial risk
associated with the meaningful increase in leverage following the
purchase by American Securities LLC. Pro forma for the acquisition,
Moody's lease adjusted debt-to-EBITDA is 6.7x for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2018. In addition, Moody's forecasts that
debt-to-EBITDA will remain solidly above 6.0x for the next twelve
to eighteen months. Under its previous owners, CPM had a history of
acquisitions and debt financed dividends. While its ownership is
changing, CPM will remain owned by a private equity firm, which
Moody's believes contributes to CPM's elevated financial risk. The
B3 CFR also reflects the high cyclical demand for new agriculture
and food processing machinery which can result in significant
peak-to-trough revenue and EBITDA declines depending on agriculture
business conditions, the global macroeconomic environment and
availability of equipment financing.

However, CPM's credit profile benefits from its healthy EBITA
margins of over 18% and its ability to generate healthy free cash
flow given its low capital spending requirements of its light
manufacturing and assembly focus. CPM's credit profile is also
supported by its fairly sizable aftermarket spare parts and service
business which represents almost 40% of EBITDA. In addition, it is
Moody's view that in the event of a notable downturn, that CPM will
proactively maintain good liquidity throughout the cycle. Lastly,
Moody's views that the company's key end markets have favorable
long term dynamics tied to global economic growth, an increasing
middle class, and increasing consumption of meat products that will
support demand for agricultural commodities.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's forecast that debt-to-EBITDA
will remain solidly above 6.0x for the next twelve to eighteen
months given the substantial increase in debt levels as a part of
the sale to American Securities LLC. It also reflects that CPM's
good liquidity profile provides it the ability to withstand normal
course changes in demand due to the cyclical nature of its end
markets.

Ratings could be upgraded should debt-to-EBITDA likely be sustained
below 6.0x and EBITA-to-interest expense is sustained above 1.5x.
An upgrade would also require financial policies supportive of
credit metrics remaining at these levels or better and the
maintenance of at least an adequate liquidity profile.

Ratings could be downgrade should operating performance falter or
debt levels increase for any reason such that it is likely that
debt-to-EBITDA would be sustained above 7.25x or EBITA-to-interest
expense approaches 1.0x. Any deterioration in liquidity including
breakeven to negative free cash flow could also prompt a downgrade.


The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Manufacturing Companies published in June 2017.

CPM Holdings Inc. (New) provides process machinery and technology
to various agricultural end markets including oilseed, animal feed,
breakfast cereal and snack food, and biofuels. Following the
transaction, CPM will be owned by American Securities LLC.
Headquartered in Waterloo, Iowa, CPM generated about $526 million
of revenue for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018.


CPM HOLDINGS: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'B' ICR
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on CPM Holdings Inc. to
negative from stable and affirmed its 'B' issuer credit rating on
the company.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B' issue-level rating
and '3' recovery rating to the company's proposed first-lien credit
facilities, which will comprise a $50 million revolving credit
facility (undrawn at close) and a $515 million first-lien term
loan. The '3' recovery rating indicates our expectation for
meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) in the event
of a default.

"Additionally, we assigned our 'B-' issue-level rating and '5'
recovery rating to the company's proposed $225 million second-lien
term loan. The '5' recovery rating indicates our expectation for
modest recovery (10%-30%; rounded estimate: 10%) in the event of a
default.

"The negative outlook reflects CPM's elevated leverage pro forma
for its acquisition by American Securities and the potential that
we will downgrade the company if its adjusted debt-to-EBITDA does
not decline below 7x over the 12-18 months following the close of
the acquisition. The company will issue $740 million of funded
debt, or approximately 7.4x estimated 2018 adjusted EBITDA,
following the close of the transaction. Based on our forecast, we
believe that any meaningful deleveraging will come from voluntary
debt reduction because we expect CPM's recent growth trends to
decelerate over the next 12 months."

The negative outlook reflects CPM's elevated leverage (7.4x
estimated 2018 adjusted debt-to-EBITDA) pro forma for its
acquisition by American Securities and the potential that we will
downgrade the company if its credit metrics do not improve
meaningfully over the 12-18 months following the close of the
transaction. Although continued growth in animal protein
consumption, particularly in China, and stable oil seed demand
should support continued improvement in CPM's overall operating
performance, S&P expects its leverage to remain around 7x.

S&P said, "We could lower our ratings on CPM if
weaker-than-expected demand or cost pressures cause its credit
metrics to remain above 7x with no near-term prospects for
improvement. This could occur if the company's sales volume
declines by 200 basis points (bps) or its operating margins
decrease by 100 bps from the assumptions in our base-case scenario.
We could also lower our ratings if CPM pursues shareholder rewards
or acquisitions that keep its credit metrics at current levels with
no foreseeable improvement in the near future.

"We could revise our outlook to stable if CPM's operating
performance continues to improve and it reduces its debt beyond
required amortization such that its adjusted debt-to-EBITDA falls
below 7x on a sustained basis. This could occur if the company's
sales volume and operating margins both increase by 100 bps above
the assumptions in our base-case scenario. In addition, we would
require the company and its financial sponsor to commit to maintain
these improved metrics despite potential acquisitions and
shareholder rewards."


DAILY GAZETTE: Retains Greenway's to Auction Dry Fork Property
--------------------------------------------------------------
Daily Gazette Co. ("DGC"), its affiliated debtors and the DIP ask
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of West Virginia to (i) retain Greenway's Real Estate & Auction,
Inc. as auctioneer; and (ii) sell DGC's unimproved real property in
Dry Fork District, Tucker County, West Virginia, which is commonly
known as Tract No. 38 in Deer Ridge Section of Timberline
Sub-Division, at auction.

On March 12, 2018, the Court entered an Order (A) Authorizing the
Sale of Substantially all of the Debtors' Assets Free and Clear of
Liens, Claims, Encumbrances, and Other Interests, (B) Authorizing
and Approving the Debtors' Performance Under the Asset Purchase
Agreement, (C) Approving the Assumption and Assignment of Certain
of the Debtors' Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases Related
Thereto, and (D) Granting Related Relief.  But for the parcel of
real estate that is the subject of the Motion, the Sale Order
approved the sale of the Debtors' business and substantially all of
their assets ("Operating Assets") to HD Media Company, LLC or its
designee.  On March 30, 2018, the Debtors and HD Media's designee,
ETBN Group, LLC, closed on the sale of the Operating Assets.

Since that time, the Debtors have been engaged in an orderly
wind-down.

The Operating Assets that were the subject of the Sale Order did
not include the Timberline Real Estate.  The Timberline Real Estate
is encumbered by a lien in favor of the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corp. ("PBGC") in the amount of $1,627,808.  The PBGC Lien is
evidenced by certain Notices of Federal Lien under I.R.C. Sections
412(n) and/or 430(k) filed by the PBGC in July 2015, October 2015,
February 2016, May 2016, and June 2016, copies of which are
attached to the proof of claim filed by the PBGC against DGC, which
was designated as Claim No. 10.  The Timberline Real Estate
represents the only remaining asset of the Debtors' estates.
Moreover, the Debtors are not aware of any other liens, claims or
encumbrances against the Timberline Real Estate.

As part of their efforts to wind-down in an orderly fashion, the
Debtors have elected to sell the Timberline Real Estate pursuant to
an auction.  In that regard, the Debtors have selected the
Auctioneer to market and sell at auction the Timberline Real
Estate.  With locations in Covington, Virginia and Lewisburg, West
Virginia, the Auctioneer has extensive experience marketing real
estate and conducting auctions and is familiar with the Timberline
Real Estate and the market in which it is located.  Accordingly,
the Debtors believe that Auctioneer is well-equipped to market and
sell the Timberline Real Estate on DGC's behalf.

The Debtors have consulted extensively with the Auctioneer and are
informed and believe that a sale of the Timberline Real Estate
pursuant to an auction will fetch the highest and best price within
a reasonable time.  Indeed, they're informed and believe that it
would be impractical for them to merely list the Timberline Real
Estate for sale with a broker and hope for a purchaser to emerge,
as owners of similarly situated vacant parcels of real estate in
the area have been unsuccessful in such sale efforts.

Since the Timberline Real Estate is believed to be worth far less
than the amount of the PBGC Lien, the PBGC has agreed to the
Debtors' proposed sale, to release its lien upon closing, and to
permit the sale proceeds to be used to pay for the costs of sale,
including the Auctioneer's compensation described below and the
Debtors' reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in pursuing
the Motion and selling the Timberline Real Estate.

By the Motion, the Debtors ask the entry of an order: (a)
authorizing them to (i) retain Auctioneer to market and sell the
Timberline Real Estate pursuant to the terms and conditions of an
Auction Listing Agreement dated as of Aug. 9, 2018 by and between
DGC and Auctioneer, and (ii) pay Auctioneer its compensation
described in the Auction Agreement without any further Court order;
and (b) authorizing and approving (i) the sale of the Timberline
Real Estate to the winning bidder at an auction free and clear of
all liens, claims, encumbrances and interests, and (ii) the payment
of net sale proceeds to the PBGC upon closing.

To minimize the continuing costs of administering and preserving
their estates and the Timberline Real Estate, the Debtors ask that
the Court waives the 14-day stay period under Bankruptcy Rule
6004(h).

A copy of the Listing Agreement attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Daily_Gazette_256_Sales.pdf

The Auctioneer:

          GREENWAY'S REAL ESTATE & AUCTION, INC.
          201 W. Locust St.
          Covington, VA 24426
          Telephone: (540) 962-1155
          Facsimile: (800) 420-1155

                  About Daily Gazette Company

Headquartered in Charleston, West Virginia, Daily Gazette Company
and its affiliates operate privately owned information and
entertainment businesses consisting of the flagship newspaper, The
Charleston Gazette-Mail, as well as a related website, weekly
publications, a saturation mail product and the following
verticals:

   http://www.wvcarfinder.com/   
   http://www.wvrealestatefinder.com/   
   http://www.wvjobfinder.com/   
   http://www.gazettemailclassifieds.com/       

Daily Gazette Company and certain of its affiliates sought for
bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Lead Case
No. 18-20028) on Jan. 30, 2018.  In the petition signed by Norman
W. Shumate III, authorized signatory, Daily Gazette Company
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million.

Affiliates that simultaneously filed Chapter 11 petitions:

    Debtor                                      Case No.
    ------                                      --------
    Daily Gazette Company                       18-20028
    Daily Gazette Holding Company, LLC          18-20029
    Charleston Newspapers Holdings, L.P.        18-20030
    Daily Gazette Publishing Company, LLC       18-20032
    Charleston Newspapers                       18-20033
    G-M Properties, Inc.                        18-20034

Judge Frank W. Volk is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Perkins Coie LLP, as lead counsel, and Supple
Law Office, PLLC, as co-counsel.  The Debtors hired Phil Murray and
Dirks, Van Essen & Murray as consultant and broker.


DAVIS PULPWOOD: Taps Galloway Wettermark as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Davis Pulpwood Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Alabama to hire Galloway, Wettermark &
Rutens, LLP, as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; prosecute actions to protect its interest; and
provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Robert Galloway, Esq., is the primary attorney at Galloway
Wettermark who will handling the case.

Mr. Galloway and his firm do not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert M. Galloway, Esq.
     Galloway, Wettermark & Rutens, LLP
     3263 Cottage Hill Road
     P.O. Box 16629
     Mobile, AL 36616-0629
     Tel: 251-476-4493
     Email: bgalloway@gallowayllp.com

                     About Davis Pulpwood Inc.

Davis Pulpwood, Inc. is a privately-held company in Franklin,
Alabama, in the lumber transportation business.  

Davis Pulpwood sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 18-04004) on Oct. 2, 2018.  The
Debtor previously filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Ala.
Case No. 17-01956) on May 25, 2017.  In the petition signed by
Diane T. Davis, vice-president, the Debtor estimated assets of less
than $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


DAWN ACQUISITIONS: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a first-time B2 corporate
family rating and a B2-PD probability of default rating to Dawn
Acquisitions LLC. Moody's has also assigned a B2 rating to the
company's proposed $600 million senior secured 1st lien credit
facility which consists of a $550 million 7-year term loan and a
$50 million 5-year revolver. Dawn is a carve-out of the colocation
business of AT&T Inc. (AT&T, Baa2 stable), which consists of a
portfolio of owned and leased data centers and related critical
infrastructure assets. The proceeds from the secured credit
facility and new equity will be used to fund the acquisition of
Dawn by Brookfield Infrastructure Fund III. The outlook is stable.


Assignments:

Issuer: Dawn Acquisitions LLC

  Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B2-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B2

  $50mm Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility,
Assigned B2 (LGD3)

  $550mm Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, Assigned B2
(LGD3)
Outlook, Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Dawn's B2 CFR reflects the strength of its geographically
diversified data center footprint which provides retail colocation
services to mostly enterprise customers attached to AT&T's global
network. The rating also incorporates the company's stable base of
contracted recurring revenue, favorable near-term US growth trends
for colocation services, modest free cash flow generation until at
least 2020 and reduced capital intensity early on due to existing
underutilized capacity. With about 90% of its customers also
utilizing AT&T's network services, Moody's believes Dawn's below
industry average customer churn profile can likely be sustained
initially given pervasive customer stickiness despite the absence
of a dedicated sales force at this AT&T segment in recent years.
These positive factors are offset by the company's small scale,
concentrated customer profile, moderately high but increasing
leverage in early years, execution risk related to the separation
from AT&T, intensifying industry competition and the potential for
higher capital intensity in the future.

Moody's expects Dawn to have leverage around 5.6x (Moody's
adjusted) at year end 2019. Moody's forecasts free cash flow to be
in the mid-to-high single digit range during 2019 and 2020 due to
modest capital spending but likely offset by potential dividend
distributions. Moody's estimates that leverage will persist around
5.6x (Moody's adjusted) through year end 2020 until new sales force
productivity drives capacity utilization higher.

Moody's expects Dawn to have good liquidity over the next 12
months. Following the transaction close, Dawn is expect to have an
undrawn $50 million revolving credit facility and $5 million cash
on hand. For 2019, Moody's forecasts Dawn generating about $5
million of free cash flow after accounting for capital spending of
about 11.5% of revenue and some potential dividend distributions.
The revolver will contain a springing maximum first lien net
leverage covenant to be tested when 35% or more of the revolver is
outstanding at the end of each quarter. The cushion is expected to
be set to at least 35% of last 12 months Consolidated Adjusted
EBITDA as calculated by the new credit agreement.

The ratings for debt instruments reflect both the probability of
default of Dawn, to which Moody's rates a PDR of B2-PD, and
individual loss given default assessments. The senior secured first
lien credit facility is rated B2, in line with the B2 CFR given the
lack of junior securities to provide loss absorption in the event
of default. The senior secured first lien credit facility is
guaranteed on a senior secured basis by Dawn Acquisitions LLC and
all direct and indirect material domestic subsidiaries subject to
certain exceptions to be agreed upon.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that Dawn will
successfully separate from AT&T and that leverage (Moody's
adjusted) will remain relatively stable and sustained below 6x.

The B2 rating could be upgraded if leverage was on track to fall
below 5x (Moody's adjusted) and free cash flow was positive, both
on a sustainable basis. The rating could be downgraded if liquidity
deteriorates or if leverage is sustained above 6x.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Communications
Infrastructure Industry published in September 2017.


DAWN ACQUISITIONS: S&P Assigns 'B' ICR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to
U.S.-based Dawn Acquisitions LLC. The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned a 'BB-' issue-level rating
and '1' recovery rating to the company's proposed senior secured
first-lien credit facilities, which consist of a $50 million
revolving credit facility maturing in 2023 and a $550 million term
loan maturing in 2025. The '1' recovery rating indicates our
expectation for substantial (90%-100%; rounded estimate: 95%)
recovery for lenders in the event of a payment default.

"The rating on Dawn reflects our view of its smaller scale than
that of rated real estate peers, the execution risks associated
with the carve-out from AT&T, and its underperforming operating
platform with low utilization rates and expected negative net
operating income (NOI) over the next couple of years. However, we
believe that positive tailwinds for data-center operators coupled
with Dawn's footprint and a high credit quality customer base
should allow it to improve operating performance gradually and
expand organically in a debt-neutral manner over the next few
years.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that following close
of the transaction, Dawn will increase utilization rates gradually
across its portfolio. We believe that strong demand for colocation
and a refocus of sales efforts on a stand-alone basis will allow
the company to normalize operating performance and apply FFO to
fund capex in a debt-neutral fashion. The stable outlook
incorporates our expectation for debt to EBITDA to remain 5.5x-6.5x
over the next couple of years.

"We could raise our ratings if utilization rates improve to the
sector average (about 85%) and its EBITDA base expands from NOI
such that EBITDA margins are also comparable to key peers (about
50%).

"We could lower the ratings if Dawn fails to attract new sales or
does so at significantly below market rents, such that the cost
structure constrains operating margin improvement. We estimate that
gross margins in the low-30% area would add pressure on leverage
metrics. At that point, we expect debt to EBITDA could approach
7.5x, which could lead to a lower rating."



DAYTON SUPERIOR: Moody's Withdraws B3 CFR on Insufficient Info
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service withdrew all ratings of Dayton Superior
Corporation, including the B3 Corporate Family Rating under review
for downgrade.

Moody's is unable to conclude its review and has decided to
withdraw the ratings because of insufficient information to monitor
the ratings, due to the issuer's decision to cease participation in
the rating process.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's has decided to withdraw the ratings because of inadequate
information to monitor the ratings, due to the issuer's decision to
cease participation in the rating process.

The following ratings were withdrawn:

  Corporate Family Rating, B3 under review for downgrade

  Probability of Default Rating, B3-PD under review for downgrade

  Senior secured term loan, Caa1 (LGD4) under review for downgrade


  Outlook, Rating Under Review

Dayton Superior, based in Miamisburg, Ohio is a leading North
American manufacturer and distributor of metal accessories and
forms used in concrete construction. The company's products are
sold to non-residential construction end markets, including
infrastructure, institutional, commercial and industrial segments.
Oaktree Capital is the sponsor.


DDC GROUP: Allowed Interim Use of Cash Collateral Until Dec. 31
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Sheri Bluebond of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California authorized DDC Group, Inc. to
further interim use of cash collateral.

The Debtor may use cash collateral to the extent necessary to pay
operating expenses between Sept. 11, 2018 and Dec. 31, 2018 as set
forth in the Budget, subject to variance of up to 10% of any line
item.

All Lenders, including YesLender LLC will receive a replacement
lien on all postpetition assets, other than avoiding power
recoveries, to secure the diminution in value of their prepetition
collateral. Post-petition liens will have the same validity and
priority as prepetition liens.  

The Debtor will pay YesLender adequate protection payments in the
amount of $3,000 on the first day of the month beginning October
through December 2018.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-17029-119.pdf

                        About DDC Group

DDC Group, Inc., is a full-service general contractor in Los
Angeles, California, specializing in expedited development service
for restaurants & retailers.  DDC Group filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-17029) on June 18, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Slava Borisov, president, the Debtor estimated
$0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Sheri Bluebond.  M
Jonathan Hayes, Esq., of Simon Resnik Hayes LLP, is the Debtor's
counsel.


DEL MONTE: Bank Debt Trades at 8% Off
-------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Del Monte Pacific
Ltd. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 91.83
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.66 percentage points from
the previous week. Del Monte pays 325 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $710 million facility. The bank loan matures on
February 18, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'CCC+' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


DORIAN LPG: Will Hold Its Annual Meeting on December 4
------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Dorian LPG Ltd. has scheduled the
Company's 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for Tuesday, Dec. 4,
2018.  Holders of the Company's common stock at the close of
business on Nov. 6, 2018, the record date, will be entitled to vote
at the Meeting.

                       About Dorian LPG

Stamford, Connecticut-based Dorian LPG Ltd. --
http://www.dorianlpg.com/-- is a liquefied petroleum gas shipping
company and an owner and operator of modern very large gas carriers
("VLGCs").  Dorian LPG's fleet currently consists of twenty-two
modern VLGCs.  Dorian LPG has offices in Stamford, Connecticut,
USA, London, United Kingdom and Athens, Greece.

Dorian LPG reported a net loss of US$20.40 million for the year
ended March 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of US$1.44 million for
the year ended March 31, 2017.  As of June 30, 2018, Dorian LPG had
US$1.70 billion in total assets, US$761.83 million in total
liabilities and US$939.31 million in total shareholders' equity.


DRY ERASE DESIGNS: Taps Grier Furr as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Dry Erase Designs, LLC, received approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of North Carolina to hire Grier Furr
& Crisp, PA, as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation and implementation of a
plan of reorganization; prosecute actions to protect its bankruptcy
estate; and provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11
case.

The firm's hourly rates range from $295 to $550 for partners and
from $295 to $360 for associates.  Paraprofessionals charge $165
per hour.  The attorneys who are likely to handle the case are:

     Joseph Grier, III     Partner       $550
     A. Cotten Wright      Partner       $380
     Michael Martinez      Partner       $295
     Anna Gorman           Associate     $360

Grier Furr is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     A. Cotten Wright, Esq.
     Grier Furr & Crisp, PA
     101 N. Tryon St., Suite 1240
     Charlotte, NC 28246
     Phone: 704-375-3720
     E-mail: cwright@grierlaw.com

                    About Dry Erase Designs

Dry Erase Designs, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 18-31459) on Sept. 27,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Laura T. Beyer presides over the case.


DTI HOLDCO: Bank Debt Trades at 3% Off
--------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which DTI Holdco Inc. is
a borrower traded in the secondary market at 97.13
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 2.73 percentage points from
the previous week. DTI Holdco pays 475 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $1.18 billion facility. The bank loan matures on
September 30, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


ELITE VINYL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------
Three affiliated companies that have filed voluntary petitions
seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                       Case No.
     ------                                       --------
     Elite Vinyl Products, Inc.                   18-08754
     4908 64th Drive West
     Bradenton, FL 34210

     Arrow Fence Systems, Inc.                    18-08755
     4908 64th Drive West
     Bradenton, FL 34210

     Pelican Vinyl Products, LLC                  18-08756
     4908 64th Drive West
     Bradenton, FL 34210

Business Description: The Debtors are family-owned companies that
                      manufactures fence accessories, vinyl
                      components and wood fencing products.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 12, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Florida (Tampa)

Debtors' Counsel: Buddy D. Ford, Esq.
                  BUDDY D. FORD, P.A.
                  9301 West Hillsborough Avenue
                  Tampa, FL 33615-3008
                  Tel: 813-877-4669
                  Fax: 813-877-5543
                  E-mail: Buddy@TampaEsq.com
                          All@tampaesq.com

Assets and Liabilities:

                            Estimated     Estimated
                              Assets      Liabilities
                           -----------    -----------
Elite Vinyl Products         $243,910      $4,499,145
Arrow Fence Systems          $224,551      $4,037,860
Pelican Vinyl Products       $294,494      $5,288,774

The petitions were signed by Sean M. Murphy, president.

A full-text copy of Elite Vinyl Products's petition containing,
among other items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured
creditors is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb18-08754.pdf

A full-text copy of Arrow Fence Systems' petition containing, among
other items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors
is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb18-08755.pdf

A full-text copy of Pelican Vinyl Products' petition containing,
among other items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured
creditors is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb18-08756.pdf


ENDO SURGICAL: Seeks Dec. 11 Exclusivity Period Extension
---------------------------------------------------------
Endo Surgical Center of North Jersey, P.C., and William J. Focazio,
MD, P.A. ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New
Jersey for an extension of the deadline to exclusively file a plan
of reorganization for an additional 60 days, until Dec. 11, 2018,
and to solicit acceptance thereof for a period of 60 days
thereafter, until Feb. 11, 2019.

The Debtors submit that they are working on a potential plan of
reorganization. Indeed, the Debtors has sought and obtained
approval, on May 3, 2018, of that certain Settlement.  Although the
Debtors have made progress in connection with their reorganization
efforts, additional time is required to prepare and finalize a plan
of reorganization.

The Debtors assert that cause exists to provide additional time for
the Debtors to file a plan of reorganization on an exclusive basis.
The Debtors submit that they are continuing to pursue possible
offers of interest to purchase a non-debtor owned building which
the funds will be utilized to fund a plan and interested parties to
buy into the medical practice.  Negotiations have been on-going but
require additional time.

The Debtors intend to use any additional time to take a breathing
spell, complete their due diligence efforts, finalize negotiations
with prospective purchasers and subsequently submit a viable, good
faith plan of reorganization. Through this process, the Debtors
will seek a result that will be fair, equitable, and transparent to
all of its creditors. Therefore, the Debtors contend that they
seeking extension of the exclusivity period for solely legitimate
reasons.

                 About Endo Surgical Center of
                       North Jersey, P.C.

Headquartered in Clifton, New Jersey, William Focazio, MD, PA, Endo
Surgical Center of North Jersey, and Fenner Ave., LLC, are
privately held companies that operate in the health care industry
specializing in internal medicine and gastroenterology.

William Focazio, MD, PA and its affiliates Endo Surgical Center of
North Jersey and Fenner Ave., LLC sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-10752,
18-10753 and 18-10755, respectively) on Jan. 13, 2018.

In the petitions signed by William Focazio, M.D., principal,
William Focazio, MD, PA disclosed $1.130 million in total assets
and $12.830 million in total liabilities; and Endo Surgical Center
listed $1.17 million in total assets and $16.49 million in total
liabilities.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia presides over the case.

Trenk DiPasquale Della Fera & Sodono, P.C., is the Debtors'
counsel.


ENRON CORP: Banks' Summary Ruling Bids vs Silvercreek Partly OK'd
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs, a group of investment funds known as "Silvercreek,"
brought the action captioned SILVERCREEK MANAGEMENT, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, v. CITIGROUP, INC., et al., Defendants, No. 02-CV-8881
(JPO) (S.D.N.Y.) against Defendants, a set of financial
institutions, for conduct relating to the issuance of debt
securities by Enron Corporation. Plaintiffs assert claims under New
York state tort law and under federal and Texas securities laws.
Defendants Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, and Merrill Lynch each
move for summary judgment. District Judge J. Paul Oetken granted
the motions in part and denied it in part.

Silvercreek brings claims of aiding and abetting fraud against all
of the Defendants. The elements of an aiding-and-abetting-fraud
claim brought under New York law are: (1) an underlying fraud; (2)
the defendant's actual knowledge of the fraud; and (3) the
defendant's substantial assistance to the fraud.

Credit Suisse and Merrill Lynch maintain that there is no evidence
that Silvercreek actually relied on Enron's financial statements
prior to purchasing the Enron notes in October 2001. (Id.) Instead,
Credit Suisse and Merrill Lynch assert that Plaintiffs purchased
the Enron notes "based solely on [their] price."

In denying the Defendants' motions on the reliance element of the
Plaintiffs' underlying fraud claim against Enron, the Court
emphasizes that its role on a motion for summary judgment is not to
ask "whether . . . the evidence unmistakably favors ones side or
the other but [only] whether a fair-minded jury could return a
verdict for the plaintiff on the evidence presented."  Here, in
crediting as true the testimony of Plaintiffs' witnesses as to
their investment strategy and assessment of Enron's financial
stability during the key period of Oct. 18, 2001, through Oct. 26,
2001, the Court cannot now hold that no reasonable jury could find
in Plaintiffs' favor, even under the clear and convincing standard.
Accordingly, Defendants' motion for summary judgment on the
reliance element of Plaintiffs' underlying fraud claim against
Enron is denied.

Silvercreek also brings claims against all three Defendants for
aiding and abetting Enron's negligent misrepresentation in
violation of New York state law. As the Court explained at the
motion to dismiss stage, Plaintiffs may recover on a claim of
aiding and abetting negligent misrepresentation if they can
establish that "[1] Enron negligently breached its duty to disclose
certain information in its securities prospectuses, and Defendants
[2] knew and [3] substantially assisted Enron in doing so."

As a threshold matter, Plaintiffs must establish all of the
elements of the underlying tort, namely Enron's negligent
misrepresentation. To do so, Plaintiffs must show that "(1) the
parties stood in some special relationship imposing a duty of care
on the defendant to render accurate information, (2) the defendant
negligently provided incorrect information, and (3) the plaintiff
reasonably relied upon the information given."

Defendants cite clear law from both the Second Circuit and this
District holding that no such special relationship exists between
the issuer of a stock and the investing public for purposes of a
negligent misrepresentation claim. For this reason, Plaintiffs
cannot establish that Enron engaged in an actionable negligent
misrepresentation as a matter of law, so the assignment of
secondary liability to the Defendants must fail as well. Because
there is no "special relationship" between Enron (the issuer of
securities) and Plaintiffs (the purchasers of those securities) for
purposes of establishing an underlying actionable negligent
misrepresentation claim under New York law, the Court grants
Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs' claims
for aiding and abetting negligent misrepresentation.

Silvercreek brings a claim of conspiracy to commit fraud against
all of the financial-institution Defendants. Each Defendant moves
for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' conspiracy claims. "To
establish a claim of civil conspiracy, plaintiff must demonstrate
the underlying tort, plus the following four elements: (1) an
agreement between two or more parties; (2) an overt act in
furtherance of the agreement; (3) the parties' intentional
participation in the furtherance of a common purpose or plan; and,
(4) resulting damage or injury."

The same evidence that was sufficient to preclude summary judgment
on Plaintiffs' aiding-and-abetting-fraud claims also suffices for
purposes of Plaintiffs' civil-conspiracy claims against Defendants.
Just as there is sufficient evidence to permit a reasonable jury to
find an underlying fraud by Enron, knowingly and substantially
assisted by Defendants, so too could a reasonable jury find that
Defendants knowingly agreed to further Enron's underlying fraud in
conducting certain transactions. Accordingly, Defendants' motions
for summary judgment on Plaintiffs' civil-conspiracy claims are
denied.

A copy of the Court's Order and Opinion dated Sept. 28, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2ROn7xt from Leagle.com.

SilverCreek Management, Inc., SilverCreek Limited Partnership &
SilverCreek II Limited, Plaintiffs, represented by Daniel A.
Shmikler -- dshmikler@sperling-law.com -- Sperling & Slater, P.C.,
Elizabeth Laughlin -- elaughlin@sperling-law.com -- Sperling &
Slater, P.C, pro hac vice, Eugene J. Frett , Sperling & Slater,
P.C., H. Adam Prussin , Pomerantz, Haudek, Block, Grossman & Gross,
L.L.P., Matthew H. Rice, Sperling & Slater, P.C., Stanley Merrill
Grossman, Pomerantz LLP, Bruce S. Sperling, Sperling & Slater,
Lyndon Mitchell Tretter, Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP & Scott F.
Hessell, Partner.

                     About Enron Corp.

Enron Corporation (former New York Stock Exchange ticker symbol
ENE) was an American energy, commodities, and services company
based in Houston, Texas.  Before its collapse and bankruptcy in
2001, Enron employed approximately 20,000 staff and was one of the
world's major electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp
and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $111 billion
during 2000.

Based in Houston, Texas, Enron Corporation filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 01-16033) on Dec. 2, 2001,
following controversy over accounting procedures that caused its
stock price and credit rating to drop sharply.

Enron hired lawyers at Togut Segal & Segal LLP; Weil, Gotshal &
Manges LLP; Venable; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP for its
bankruptcy case.  The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in
the case tapped lawyers at Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP.

The Debtors won confirmation of their Plan in July 2004, and the
Plan was declared effective on Nov. 17, 2004.  After approval of
the Plan, the new board of directors decided to change the name of
Enron Corp. to Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. to reflect the
current corporate purpose.  ECRC's sole mission is to reorganize
and liquidate certain of the operations and assets of the
"pre-bankruptcy" Enron for the benefit of creditors.

ECRC has been involved in the MegaClaims Litigation, an action
against 11 major banks and financial institutions that ECRC
believes contributed to Enron's collapse; the Commercial Paper
Litigation, an action involving the recovery of payments made to
commercial paper dealers; and the Equity Transactions Litigation,
which ECRC filed against Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., UBS AG,
Credit Suisse and Bear Stearns to recover payments made to the four
banks on transactions involving Enron's stock while the company was
insolvent.


EPW LLC: Sale of All Assets at Auction Approved
-----------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Indiana
authorized EPW, LLC's bidding procedures in connection with the
sale of substantially all its machinery, equipment, materials,
inventory, work-in-process, accounts receivable, customer deposits
and all other property, tangible and intangible to VMW Tooling
Group, LLC for $575,000, subject to overbid.

The sale will be "as is, where is, with all faults," and free and
clear of all liens, encumbrances, claims and interests attach.ing
to the Sale proceeds.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: 5:00 p.m. (ET) on Oct. 1, 2018

     b. Initial Bid: In excess of $605,000

     c. Deposit: $57,500

     d. Auction: The Auction will be conducted at the offices of
Hammerschmidt, Arnaral & Jonas 137 N. Michigan St., South Bend,
Indiana, 46601, on Oct. 5, 2018, at 11:30 a.m. (ET).

     e. Bid Increments: Any successive bids must be submitted in
minimum increments, which will be determined by the DIP at the
beginning of the Auction.

     f. VMW Tool Group, LLC, as the stalking horse bidder for the
Auction, is already a Qualifying Bidder

Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties, the closing
Will occur no later than 15 days after entry of the order approving
the sale of the Property to the Prevailing Bidder, in accordance
with the terms of the Prevailing Bidder Sale Documents.

The DIP will be under no obligation to pay commission to any agent
or broker and all commissions, fees or expenses for agents are
payable by the bidders and will not be deducted from the proceeds
of the sale of the Property.

A copy of the APA and the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/EPW_LLC_45_Sales.pdf

The Sale Order will constitute a final judgment and order.

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Bankruptcy Rules
6004(h), 6006(d), 7062, 9014 or otherwise, the Sale Order will be
immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry.

                         About EPW, LLC

EPW, LLC, is a privately held company engaged in the business of
manufacturing electric lighting equipment.

EPW, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ind. Case No.
18-31460) on Aug. 10, 2018.  In the petition signed by Douglas L.
Lammon, president, the Debtor disclosed $838,157 in total assets
and $1,302,073 in total liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge
Harry C. Dees, Jr.  Hammerschmidt, Amaral & Jonas, led by R.
William Jonas, Jr., serves as counsel to the Debtor.


EZE CASTLE: S&P Withdraws 'B' Issuer Credit Rating on Debt Payment
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew all of its ratings on Eze Castle
Software Inc. and its subsidiaries, including our 'B' issuer credit
rating.

The withdrawal follows the successful completion of SS&C's
acquisition of Eze Castle and the redemption of Eze Castle's debt.



FBJ REAL ESTATE: Andrews Buying Purcellville Property for $770K
---------------------------------------------------------------
FBJ Real Estate, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia to authorize the sale of assets,
consisting of six improved and unimproved parcels of property
comprising approximately 85 acres located at Turneysville Road,
Purcellville, Virginia Route 833, in Loudoun County, Virginia,
other than in the ordinary course of business, to John A. Andrews,
Trustee, for $770,000.

These six parcels comprising the Property were conveyed to the
Debtor by its mems.  Parcel 1 is approximately 24 acres, Parcel 2
is approximately 56 acres, and Parcels 3 through 6 are an aggregate
of approximately three acres.  There are three houses listed over
the six parcels comprising the Property.

Parcel 1 of the Property is identified in the Loudoun County Land
Records as PIN No. 507207129000.  Parcel 2 of the Property is
identified in the Loudoun County Land Records as PIN No.
507296794000.  Parcels 3-6 of the Property are identified in the
Loudoun County Land Records as PIN Nos. 472254991000, 472256080000,
472257269000, and 472255853000, respectively.

The Property is subject to a conservation easement which was
granted by the Debtor to the Northern Virginia Conservation Trust
on Nov. 22, 2006.  The Deed of Gift of Conservation Easement was
filed in the Land Records of Loudoun County as Instrument Number
20061128-0098723.

The Property is also subject to a stream mitigation easement
effectuated by a Declaration of Restriction Covenants dated Dec. 3,
2007, which was recorded in the Land Records of Loudoun County as
Instrument Number 20080107-0001093.  The Debtor has paid the County
of Loudoun in full.

Based on the foregoing, the Debtor may transfer and sell the assets
free and clear of all liens, including the liens of Summit
Community Bank and any taxing authorities, claims, encumbrances,
and other interests, with such liens, claims, encumbrances and
other interests attaching to the sales proceeds.

In a sound exercise of its business judgment, the Debtor has
determined that the sale of the Property to the Buyer is in its
best interests, its estates, and its creditors.  Based on the
foregoing, it respectfully submits that the Court should approve
the proposed sale of the Property to the Buyer.

The Debtor plans to sell the Property to the Buyer, pursuant to the
Contract for $770,000.

Its Debts as listed in the Plan are as follows (Total: $1,920,058):


     a. Class 1 Administrative Costs (Counsel, Accountant, U.S.
Trustee) - $27,810.39

     b. Class 2 Claims County of Loudoun - 10,000

     c. Class 3 Internal Revenue Service - $25,073

     d. Class 4 Summit Community Bank - $643,544
     
     e. Class 5 Unsecured Creditors - $42,879

     f. Class 6 The Business Bank - $674,000

     g. Class 7 Insider Claims - $496,752


Of these creditors, only the following filed proofs of claim
(Total: $713,264):

     a. Redmon Peyton & Braswell, LLP - $19,017

     b. Internal Revenue Service - $25,073

     c. Updegrove, Combs & McDaniel, PLC - $4,946

     d. Summit Community Bank - $643,544

     e. Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C. - $2,980

     f. County of Loudoun, Virginia - $13,569

     g. Warren R. Stein, P.C. - $4,002

     h. Commonwealth of Virginia - $134

The Debtor anticipates to pay these creditors a total of $727,371
with the proceeds from the sale of the Property:

     a. U.S. Trustee - $5,850

     b. Debtor's Counsel - $21,960

     c. Redmon Peyton & Braswell, LLP - $19,017

     d. Internal Revenue Service - $25,073

     e. Updegrove, Combs & McDaniel, PLC - $4,946

     f. Summit Community Bank - $643,544

     g. Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C. - $2,980

     h. Warren R. Stein, P.C. - $4,002

The amount remaining after disbursements is $42,629.

The Debtor asks the Court that the provisions of Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h) and 6006(d) will not apply to the
Order approving the sale the Property and that the transactions
contemplated may be consummated immediately following entry of the
Order approving the sale of the Property.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/FBJ_Real_141_Sales.pdf

                     About FBJ Real Estate

FBJ Real Estate, LLC, 12022 Meadowville Court, Herndon, VA 20170,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-11737) on
May 20, 2015.  In the petition signed by Joseph L. Bane, Jr.,
co-managing member, the Debtors disclosed total assets at $4.2
million and total liabilities at $1.6 million.  Judge Brian F.
Kenney presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped Frank Bredimus,
Esq., at Law Office of Frank Bredimus as counsel.



FINANCIALLY FIT: Proposes Dell Auction of Six Ogden Parcels
-----------------------------------------------------------
Financially Fit Holding Corp., also known as Financially Fit Bank,
and 24th & Washington, LLC, ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah to authorize the private sale of six parcels of
real property located at 2404 Washington Boulevard, Ogden, Utah at
auction.

24th is the beneficiary listed in a deed of trust filed of record
as Entry No. 2797236 in the Weber County Recorder's office.  Debtor
Financially Fit is the trustor under the Trust Deed and is the
current owner of six parcels of real property that are subject to
the Trust Deed.  

The parcels included have the following Weber County parcel
numbers: 01-022-0047; 01-022-0028; 01-022-0031; 01-022-0029;
01-022-0030; and 01-022-0010 ("Property").  The Property is located
at 2404 Washington Boulevard, Ogden, Utah.  The Trust Deed
evidences 24th's perfected security interest in the Property.

24th sold the Property to the Debtor in June of 2016.  It financed
the sale through a promissory note and the Trust Deed.  24th is the
only secured creditor in this proceeding.  As of Aug. 7, 2018, the
Debtor owed approximately $2,268,110 to 24th, plus costs and
attorney fees.  That amount has continued to increase over time.  

The Property is worth between $2.3 million on the low end and
roughly $3.8 million on the high end.

In the summer of 2017, prior to the petition being filed, Dell
Nichols of Dell Nichols Commercial Real Estate, LLC, listed the
Property for sale.  Mr. Nichols identified multiple potential
buyers for the Property prior to the filling of the petition.
Around the same time that the real estate brokerage was retained,
the Debtor defaulted under the Trust Deed and 24th initiated a
non-judicial foreclosure.

The Debtor filed the petition immediately prior to a scheduled
foreclosure sale of the Property.  24th and the Debtor have
stipulated to sell the Property at auction according to the terms
in the Motion.  The Debtor, who is in possession of the Property,
will engage Dell Nichols to list and market the Property for public
auction according to their Listing Agreement.  The marketing will
show the asking price as $3.8 million.

An auction of the Property will be conducted within 60 days after
the filing of the Motion according to these criteria:

     a. 24th will make a credit bid for the amount owed by Debtor
to 24th at the time of the auction, including interest, attorney
fees, and costs authorized under the agreement between the Debtor
and 24th.

     b. The Property will be sold as-is and where-is with no
representations by the Debtor, except that it has authority to
transfer the Property with Court approval, and free and clear of
interests.

     c. The sale will include a title insurance policy on the
Property in favor of the buyer.

     d. An attorney from SEB Legal Attorneys at Law, LLC, will
conduct the public auction.

     e. The auctioneer will accept the highest and best bid to
purchase the Property and a backup bidder in case the highest and
best bidder fails to close.

     f. What constitutes the highest and best bid will be
determined in the discretion of the auctioneer.

     g. A non-credit bid will only be accepted if it is higher than
the credit bid of 24th plus all unpaid real estate taxes and
closing costs to transfer the Property, which will include a 6%
real estate commission, title insurance costs which are estimated
to be between $5,789 and $7,191, escrow cost which are estimated to
be $575, recording costs which are estimated to be $125, and any
other closing costs.

     h. The highest bidder will post a $100,000, non-refundable bid
bond at the auction.

If an offer is made prior to the auction for $3.3 million or
higher, and the other terms of the offer are acceptable, the Debtor
may accept the offer and close the sale without conducting the
auction.

The Closing of the sale will occur within 14 calendar days of the
auction.  The highest bidder will pay the remainder of their bid at
that time.  If the highest bidder fails to close the sale, the
$100,000 bid bond will become part of the Debtor's bankruptcy
estate and the back-up bidder will be given the opportunity to
close within 14 calendar days.

If no bids are made, except 24th's opening bid, then the Property
will be transferred to 24th in exchange for all amounts owed by the
Debtor to 24th.

Following the close of the sale, the title company will disburse
the costs of selling the property including a 6% real estate agent
commission (which will include the costs of auction), title
insurance and escrow costs, current and unpaid real estate taxes on
the Property, and other costs associated with the sale of the
Property.

For the purpose of this motion, Net Sale Proceeds equals the gross
sale proceeds less the costs of sale, the amount to discharge the
debt owed to 24th, and taxes.  

The auctioneer will file a statement of the property sold, the name
of each purchaser, and the price received for the Property.  The
statement will be filed with the Court and a copy transmitted to
the United States trustee and the DIP.

A copy of the Listing Agreement attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Financially_Fit_20_Sales.pdf

              About Financially Fit Holding Corp.
                 a/k/a Financially Fit Bank

Financially Fit Holding Corp. is a financial institution in Salt
Lake City, Utah.  Financially Fit Holding Corp., based in Salt Lake
City, UT, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Utah Case No.
18-25493) on July 27, 2018. In the petition signed by Steven Down,
president, the Debtor disclosed $3,000,000 in assets and $2,238,941
in liabilities.  The Hon. Kimball R. Mosier presides over the case.
Jeffrey C. Howe, Esq., serves as bankruptcy counsel.



FINISAR CORP: Egan-Jones Lowers Sr. Unsecured Ratings to BB-
------------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on October 2, 2018, downgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by Finisar Corporation to BB- from BB.

Headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, Finisar Corporation is a
manufacturer of optical communication components and subsystems. In
2008, Finisar merged with Optium Corporation.



FORTERRA INC: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Forterra
Incorporated is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 95.38
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 2.46 percentage points from
the previous week. Forterra Incorporated pays 300 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $1.047 billion facility. The bank
loan matures on October 25, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, September 28.


FQ/LB LP: MG Interests Buying Six Willis Lots for $360K
-------------------------------------------------------
FQ/LB L.P. asks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas to sell six unimproved residential real
property lots in the Lake Breeze subdivision in Montgomery County,
Texas, with addresses of: (i) 10728 S. Lake Mist Lane, Willis,
Texas 77318 (02/01/37); (ii) 10712 S. Lake Mist Lane, Willis, Texas
77318 (02/01/33); (iii) 10720 S. Lake Mist Lane, Willis, Texas
77318 (02/01/35); (iv) 10729 S. Lake Mist Lane, Willis, Texas 77318
(02/01/17); (v) 10736 S. Lake Mist Lane, Willis, Texas 77318
(02/01/39); and (v) 10740 S. Lake Mist Lane, Willis, Texas 77318
(02/01/40), to MG Interests for $360,000, payable $36,000 at
closing and the delivery of the Purchaser' Promissory Note in the
amount of $324,000, with monthly interest payments only of 5.25%
for 60 months, with all unpaid interest, principal and other
charges due upon the maturity of the Note.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 calendar days of the
date the Motion was served.

The repayment of the Note will be secured by a Deed of Trust and
Security Interest, retaining a vendor's lien on the Property and
other customary terms applicable to a mortgage on real estate, as
well as the personal guaranty of Karrie Yager, as the principals of
the Purchaser.  Karrie Yager is a chiropractor who practices at the
Memorial Chiropractic Clinic, in which Mr. Christie, the President
of the Debtor's General Partner, also practices.

A copy of the contract and related addenda and amendment attached
to the Motion is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/FQ-LB_LP_131_Sales.pdf

The Debtor asks that the sale be made free and clear of certain
liens, claims, interests and encumbrances, with the liens attaching
to the sale proceeds and the Seller financing loan documents, which
will be held pending further order of the Court.

A judgment lien of Old Kentucky Farms, LP asserted to be in an
amount of approximately $1.183 million encumbers the Property.  In
addition, the Debtor believes there is likely a tax lien for
accrued, but otherwise current property taxes.  Old Kentucky Farms
has earlier agreed to have its lien attach to the proceeds of the
sale of the Property, but if it objects or declines to consent,
then its opposition to the sale on that ground should be
overruled.

From the sale proceeds, in accordance with the Contract, the Debtor
asks that it be permitted to pay all of the Seller's ordinary and
necessary costs and fees incident to the sale, including real
estate brokers' commissions of not more than 5% and an owners'
title policy the Debtor is required to provide under the Contract,
prorated real estate taxes through the date of closing, and any
ordinary and necessary costs and fees incident to the sale that the
Seller is required to pay pursuant to the Contract.

The Debtor asks that it be authorized to consummate the sale,
including executing in its discretion any necessary and appropriate
closing documents and the Loan Documents; and further asks that its
estate receive the entire balance of the proceeds net of the
foregoing the Seller's Costs, with all liens, claims, interests and
encumbrances, including Old Kentucky Farms' judgment lien,
attaching to the remaining balance of the proceeds (after the
foregoing Seller's Costs have been paid) as well as to the Loan
Documents.

                       About FQ/LB L.P.

Based in Conroe, Texas, FQ/LB L.P., a privately held company that
operates in the land subdivision industry, filed voluntary Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex., Case No. 18-31895) on April 13,
2018, and is represented by Joseph G Epstein, Esq., and Shannon,
Martin, Finkelstein, Alvarado & Dunne, P.C.  The Debtors' special
litigation counsel is Feldman & Feldman, P.C.  At the time of
filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and estimated liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


FR DIXIE: S&P Cuts ICR to 'D' on Missed Payments on Credit Facilty
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on FR Dixie
Acquisition Corp. to 'D' from 'CCC'.

At the same time, S&P lowered its issue-level ratings on the
company's revolver and term loan to 'D' from 'CCC'. The recovery
ratings remain '3', indicating its expectation for meaningful
(50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in the event of a payment
default.

The downgrade reflects the recently missed interest and principal
payments under the company's credit facility as the company has
entered into a forbearance agreement with certain lenders. S&P
views this as a general default and believe the company will likely
elect not to meet its debt obligations with lenders while it seeks
an agreement on a financial restructuring plan with them.



FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off
---------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Frontier
Communications Corporation is a borrower traded in the secondary
market at 97.94 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday,
September 28, 2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson
Reuters MTM Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.31 percentage
points from the previous week. Frontier Communications pays 375
basis points above LIBOR to borrow under the $1.5 billion facility.
The bank loan matures on June 15, 2024. Moody's rates the loan 'B2'
and Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is
one of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, September 28.


GATEWAY WIRELESS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Gateway Wireless LLC
        138 Junction Drive
        Glen Carbon, IL 62034

Business Description: Gateway Wireless LLC is a privately held
                      company in Glen Carbon, Illinois that
                      operates in the telecommunications industry.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 12, 2018

Case No.: 18-31491

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Illinois (East St Louis)

Judge: Hon. Laura K. Grandy

Debtor's Counsel: Spencer P. Desai, Esq.
                  CARMODY MACDONALD P.C.
                  120 S. Central Ave, Suite 1800
                  St Louis, MO 63105
                  Tel: (314) 854-8600
                  Fax: (314) 854-8660
                  E-mail: spd@carmodymacdonald.com

                     - and -

                  Thomas Riske, Esq.
                  CARMODY MACDONALD PC
                  120 S Central Ave, Suite 1800
                  St Louis, MO 63105
                  Tel: (314) 854-8600
                  Fax: (314) 854-8660
                  E-mail: thr@carmodymacdonald.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Ryan F. Walker, president.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilsb18-31491.pdf

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Accel Capital LLC                  Business Assets       $532,278
65 West 36th Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10018

American Express                     Credit Card         $368,511
PO Box 297879
Tampa, FL 33631

Arcarius LLC                       Business Assets       $242,145

Argus Capital                      Business Assets       $242,145
Funding, LLC

Capital Merchant                   Business Assets       $712,025
Services LLC
116 Nassau Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10038

Capital One                          Credit Card         $154,670

Chase                              Business Assets       $395,412
P.O. Box 15298
Wilmington, DE 19850

Credibility Capital                Business Assets       $250,000
625 Broad Street
Newark, NJ 07102

First State Community Bank         Business Assets     $1,159,000
1 Black Knight Drive
Farmington, MO 63640

Fundation                          Business Assets       $212,782
11501 Sunset Hills Rd, Suite 100
Reston, VA 20190

Funding Circle                     Business Assets       $331,131
747 Front Street, 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

Green Capital                      Business Assets       $404,730
Funding LLC
116 Nassau Street, Suite 804
New York, NY 10038

GTR Source LLC                     Business Assets     $1,290,628
c/o Issac Greenfield
333 Pearsall Ave., Suite 110
Cedarhurst, NY 11516

Influx Capital LLC                 Business Assets       $350,254
32 Court Street, Suite 205
Brooklyn, NY 11201

Ingram Micro Mobility              Telecommunication   $1,000,000
3351 Michelson Drive, Suite 100        Equipment
Irvine, CA 92612                       Financing

Libertas Funding LLC               Business Assets       $549,372
382 Greenwich Ave
Suite 2 Second Floor
Greenwich, CT 06830

Prime Business                        Accounts           $284,809
2371 McDonald Ave
Brooklyn, NY 11223

Queen Funding LLC                  Business Assets       $335,000
2221 NE 164 Street Suite 1144
North Miami Beach, FL 33160

Saturn Funding LLC                 Business Assets       $284,200
333 7th Ave
New York, NY 10001

Wells Fargo Bank                     Credit Card         $182,368


GI REVELATION: S&P Cuts Issuer Credit Rating to B-, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on Washington,
D.C.-based GI Revelation Acquisition LLC to 'B-' from 'B'. The
outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered the issue-level rating on
the company's first-lien debt to 'B' from 'B+'. The recovery rating
remains '2', indicating our expectation of substantial recovery
(70%-90%; rounded estimate: 70%) in the event of a payment
default.

"In addition, we lowered the issue-level rating on Consilio's
second-lien term loan to 'CCC' from 'CCC+'. The recovery rating
remains '6', indicating our expectation of negligible recovery
(0%-10%; rounded estimate: 5%) in the event of a payment default."

The downgrade reflects increased leverage at Consilio, following
the company's announcement it plans to add $150 million of
incremental first-lien debt to fund its $170 million acquisition of
DiscoverReady. S&P said, "We expect the company's equity sponsor to
contribute $20 million. We expect the company's pro forma leverage
to increase above 8x following the transaction and at year-end
2018. While we expect leverage to decline to the mid-6x by 2019,
the timing of the transaction--six months following the leveraged
buyout (LBO) by GI Partners, at which time pro forma leverage
increased to roughly 7x--reflects our expectation that the
financial policy of the sponsor will remain aggressive."

S&P said, "The stable outlook on Consilio reflects our expectation
for low–single-digit percentage organic revenue growth and margin
expansion over the next 12 months. We expect the company to
successfully integrate DiscoverReady and achieve at least $20
million in cost synergies, resulting in adjusted leverage declining
to the mid-6x area by year-end 2019 from above 8x at transaction
close, and FOCF to debt in the low-single-digit percentages.

"We could raise our ratings over the next 12 months if we expect
adjusted debt to EBITDA leverage to be sustained below 7x and FOCF
to debt in the mid-single-digit percent area. This would occur due
to good organic revenue growth, realization of synergies, the
company achieving efficiencies of scale, and improved operating
leverage resulting in higher EBITDA margins.

"We could lower our ratings over the next 12 months if
weaker-than-expected operating performance results in FOCF deficits
or we forecast that the company cannot service its debt in a timely
manner. A downgrade would most likely result from integration
issues, customer losses following the latest two acquisitions,
unanticipated restructuring and synergy realization costs, or the
deterioration of EBITDA margins through greater than expected
competitive pressures."



GOLDEN OIL: Exclusive Solicitation Period Extended to Dec. 10
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Eduardo V. Rodriquez of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas, at the behest of Golden Oil Holding
Corporation, has extended the exclusivity period for the Debtor to
solicit and obtain acceptance of its Combined Chapter 11 Plan and
Disclosure Statement to Dec. 10, 2018.

              About Golden Oil Holding Corporation

Golden Oil Holding Corporation is a privately held company in
Houston, Texas in the oil and gas extraction business.  The Company
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 18-31594) on
March 30, 2018.  In the petition signed by Ralph McElvenny,
president and director, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.  The
case is assigned to Judge Karen K. Brown.  The Debtor is
represented by Edward L. Rothberg, Esq., at Hoover Slovacek, LLP.


GOLFTHERE CORP: Taps C. Taylor Crockett as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
GolfThere Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Alabama to hire C. Taylor Crockett
P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan;
and provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Crockett charges an hourly fee of $375 for its services.  It
received a retainer in the sum of $14,350.  

The firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor's estate, according to court filings.

Crockett can be reached through:

     C. Taylor Crockett, Esq.
     C. Taylor Crockett P.C.
     2067 Columbiana Road
     Birmingham, AL 35216
     Phone: 205-978-3550

                    About GolfThere Corporation

A Chapter 7 involuntary petition was filed against GolfThere
Corporation (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 18-03010) on July 24, 2018.
The petitioning creditors are Oconee Golf Company LLC, Troon Golf
LLC, Honours Golf - WGV LLC, Honours - Rock Creek Golf Course LLC,
Honours - Peninsula Golf Club LLC, Honours Golf - Craft Farms LLC,
Troon North Golf Club LLC, and Westin Operator LLC.  The case was
converted to one under Chapter 11.


HARBOR FREIGHT: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'BB-' ICR
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised the outlook on Calabasas, Calif.-based
Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc. (HFT) to negative from stable and
affirmed the 'BB-' issuer credit rating on the company.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'BB-' issue-level
rating on HFT's $2.16 billion senior secured term loan due in 2023.
The '3' recovery rating is unchanged and indicates our expectation
for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%) recovery in the
event of a payment default. We do not rate the company's $700
million asset-based lending (ABL) revolver due in 2021.

"The outlook revision reflects our expectation for significant
pressure on HFT's profit margin over the next few quarters from the
most recently imposed U.S. tariffs, effective in early 2019, on
certain imports from China. HFT sources about 80% its private label
products from China, which the company can't easily source
elsewhere in the near term. The negative outlook considers the
uncertainty around the timing and magnitude of the impact of
tariffs, which could be greater than we currently anticipate, and
the potential for additional tariffs.

"The negative outlook reflects the potential for a lower rating
over the next 12 months, as we expect HFT's operating performance
to come under pressure because of the impact of the recently
imposed U.S. tariffs, effective in early 2019, on certain imports
from China, where the company sources a majority of its private
label products. The negative outlook takes into account the
uncertainty around the full extent and timing of the impact of
tariffs, as well as the company's ability to mitigate the impact on
margin through sales price increases.

"We could lower the rating if we expected leverage to remain over
4x either because the company continued to pursue an aggressive
financial policy despite tariff impacts, or if tariffs reduced
margins. This would occur if the company is unable to pass on the
tariffs to customers in the form of higher prices, if performance
is hurt by foreign currency exchange risks (primarily the Chinese
renminbi), or if the U.S. government imposes additional tariffs on
Chinese imports. Under this scenario, the adjusted EBITDA margin
would decline in excess of 400 bps and contribute to leverage
meeting our downgrade threshold.

"We could revise the outlook back to stable if we expect adjusted
debt to EBITDA to improve to the mid- to high-3x area on a
sustained basis. This would likely be the result of some
combination of sales price increases, favorable currency movements
or smaller-than-anticipated impact from tariffs, which would give
us confidence that any special returns of capital to shareholders
could be managed under 4x."



HD SUPPLY: Moody's Rates New Secured Term Loan Ba2, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba2 rating to HD Supply,
Inc.'s proposed senior secured term loan maturing 2023. Proceeds
from this term loan will be used to repay the company's existing
senior secured term loans maturing 2021 and 2023, at which time the
Ba2 rating assigned to each of these credit facilities will be
withdrawn, and to pay related fees and expenses. Moody's
anticipates pricing to be slightly lower than the existing rate for
each of the term loans. HDS's Ba2 Corporate Family Rating, Ba2-PD
Probability of Default Rating, SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity
Rating, and Ba3 rating assigned to its senior unsecured notes due
2026 are not affected as well. Rating outlook is stable.

The following ratings/assessments are affected by the action:

Assignments:

Issuer: HD Supply, Inc.

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned Ba2 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Moody's views the paying off of the company's term loan maturing in
2021 as a credit positive. Repaying this credit facility extends
HDS's revolving credit facility expiration date to its stated date
of 2022. The revolver is no longer constrained by its maturity date
springing forward based on the term loan's outstanding amount at
its 2021 maturity. HDS now has a very extended maturity profile
without constraints; its revolving credit facility expires in 2022
followed by its term loan maturing in 2023.

HD Supply, Inc.'s Ba2 Corporate Family Rating is not impacted by
the repricing of its term loan. Modest interest savings will not
materially affect key debt credit metrics over the next 12 to 18
months. Moody's projects revenues of about $6.2 billion by late
2019, resulting in interest coverage, measured as adjusted
EBITA-to-interest expense, of 4.6x over its time horizon, and
adjusted leverage of 2.6x by late 2019 as well.

The Ba2 rating, same rating as HDS's Corporate Family Rating,
assigned to its proposed senior secured term loan maturing in 2023
results from its effective subordination to company's revolving
credit facility, but seniority in repayment to the company's senior
unsecured notes. It has a first-lien on substantially all
non-current assets, and a second-lien on assets securing company's
revolving credit facility. Moody's believes residual value of
second-lien collateral will be minimal in a distressed scenario.
The term loans amortize 1% per year with a bullet payment in 2023.
HDS's material domestic subsidiaries provide upstream guarantees.
The term loan has no financial maintenance covenants.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Distribution and
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.

HD Supply, Inc., headquartered in Atlanta, GA, is one of the
largest North American industrial distributors of products and
services for maintenance, repair and operations, and specialty
construction. Annualized revenues approximate $6.0 billion.


HOLLEY PURCHASER: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings for
aftermarket engine products company Holley Purchaser, Inc.,
including a B3 Corporate Family Rating and a B3-PD Probability of
Default Rating. Moody's also assigned B2 ratings to the proposed
senior secured (first lien) bank credit facilities, including a $50
million revolver due 2023, a $380 million term loan due 2025 and a
$20 million delayed draw term loan due 2025. A stable rating
outlook was assigned.

"Holley's initial leverage is high for the rating category and does
not provide it with enough cushion to withstand a cyclical
downturn," says Moody's analyst Inna Bodeck. "We also believe that
the roll-up strategy using debt financing will impose additional
risks absent substantial debt repayment."

The proceeds from the first lien term loans along with a $145
million senior secured second lien term loan (unrated) and new cash
equity will be used to complete the acquisition of Holley
Performance Products by Sentinel Capital Partners. At the time of
the acquisition, Sentinel intends to combine Holley Performance
Products with Driven Performance Brands, an existing Sentinel
portfolio company, which will form the borrower, Holley Purchaser,
Inc.

Issuer: Holley Purchaser, Inc.

Assignments:

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

$50 million Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Revolving Credit Facility
due 2023, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

$380 million Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan due 2025,
Assigned B2 (LGD3)

$20 million Gtd Senior Secured First Lien Delayed Draw Term Loan
due 2025, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Outlook Action:

Outlook, Assigned Stable

This is a newly initiated rating and this is Moody's first press
release on this issuer.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 CFR represents Holley's modest scale, limited track record
operating as one company, discretionary nature of product
offerings, exposure to cyclical end markets, high leverage and
event risk under private equity ownership. These challenges are
mitigated by Holley's good market position in the niche performance
aftermarket engines products space, branded portfolio resulting in
relatively high margins and the expectations of positive free cash
flow generation of approximately $10 million.
The company has been successful in its product development efforts
and thus has experienced good organic growth over the past few
years. However, Holley continues to rely on a slowly declining
warehouse distribution channel. Given the company's interest in
attracting younger customers, Moody's expects the company to be
more focused on the growth of the on-line channel vis-a-vis its own
website and other e-tailers. Moody's projects that the company's
high debt-to-EBITDA financial leverage (6.1x LTM 6/30/2018
incorporating Moody's standard adjustments and pro forma for the
transaction) will decline modestly to the high 5.0x over the next
12 months as the company continues to grow and realizes synergies
from the combination of the two entities, although it is subject to
an event risk under sponsor ownership.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the
company successfully integrates both companies and that operating
results as a combined company will improve modestly over the next
12 to 18 months and result in gradually improved credit metrics.
Moody's also assumes the company will generate positive free cash
flow.

The ratings could experience upward pressure once the company
successfully integrates the two businesses and maintains strong
margins, a debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 5.0x and EBITA-to-Interest
coverage above 2.0x. Moody's would also expect the company to
maintain good liquidity profile throughout an industry cycle to
consider an upgrade.

A downgrade could occur if deteriorating operating results, debt
financed acquisitions or shareholder dividends result in the
debt-to-EBITDA ratio remaining above 6.0x or weaker free cash flow.
A deterioration in overall liquidity could also result in a
downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Automotive Supplier Industry published in June 2016.

Holley Purchaser, Inc. designs and manufactures performance engine
products for the enthusiast focused automotive aftermarket. The
company's product offerings include electronic fuel injection and
tuner systems, ignition controls, carburetors, superchargers,
exhaust systems and other products designed to enhance the
performance of the car. Pro forma revenue for the combined company
was approximately $400 million for the 12 months ended June 2018.
Sentinel Capital Partners will be the majority owner of Holley when
the debt financing and acquisition are completed.


HOLLEY PURCHASER: S&P Assigns 'B-' ICR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B-' issuer credit rating to
Bowling Green, Ky.-based aftermarket auto supplier Holley Purchaser
Inc. The outlook is stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B-' issue-level
rating and '3' recovery rating to the company's proposed $50
million cash flow revolver and $400 million first-lien term loan,
comprising a $380 million term loan and a $20 million delayed-draw
facility. The '3' recovery rating indicates our expectation that
debtholders would realize meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate:
60%) recovery in the event of a payment default.

"Our ratings on Holley reflect the company's highly leveraged
balance sheet and its niche position in the broader auto supplier
market. Our ratings also account for the discretionary nature of
Holley's products, which requires the company to successfully
innovate and adapt to attract customers focused on auto performance
products.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the company will
continue to maintain EBITDA margins near current levels, allowing
it to generate free cash flow. We expect the company will maintain
its market share in its products lines, while using acquisitions to
grow new product areas.

"We could raise the rating on Holley if leverage falls below 6.5x
and if the company maintains a ratio of free operating cash flow
(FOCF) of at least 3%. This could be due to stronger margins from
more direct-to-consumer sales or from greater synergy realization.
Even if the company were to achieve these triggers, we would need
Holley to develop a longer track record of operating at these
improved levels before raising our rating. We would also have to be
confident its private equity sponsor would not want to further
increase leverage higher with acquisitions or dividends.

"We could lower our rating on Holley if EBITDA margins fall 25%
from current levels, causing its FOCF to become negative for
multiple quarters and affect liquidity, or cause debt leverage to
worsen from current levels such that we view it as unsustainable.
This could occur because of quality issues or greater competition,
leading to loss of share."



HOSPITALITY INTEGRATED: Cash Collateral Stipulation Gets Final Nod
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Paul Sala of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Arizona has entered a final order approving Hospitality Integrated
Services, Inc.'s Stipulation with Deck Capital, Inc. regarding the
use of cash collateral, and Debtor's payments of $1,420.46 per week
to On Deck per the terms of the Stipulation.

A copy of the Order is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb18-08776-50.pdf

                About Hospitality Integrated Services

Hospitality Integrated Services, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-08776) on July 24, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Daniel Taft, Sr., president and CEO, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of at least $50,000.  The Debtor
is represented by Douglas B. Price, Esq., of the Law Offices of
Douglas B. Price, P.C.  No official committee of unsecured
creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


HUDSON RIVER TRADING: S&P Rates $348.5MM Term Loan Due 2025 'BB-'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it assigned its 'BB-' issue-level
rating on Hudson River Trading LLC's $348.5 million senior secured
term loan B due 2025. This represents an approximately $50 million
upsizing of the existing term loan that it is refinancing. While
S&P expects the additional capital to support continued growth of
the firm's trading operations, the upsizing has no impact on the
issuer credit rating on Hudson River because it expects its
risk-adjusted capital ratio to remain in line with the current
ratings at above 11%.   

  RATINGS LIST
  Hudson River Trading LLC
   Issuer Credit Rating                BB-/Stable/--

  New Rating

  Hudson River Trading LLC
   Senior Secured
    $348.5 mil term loan B due 2025    BB-



HYLAND SOFTWARE: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Alters Outlook to Neg.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Hyland Software, Inc.'s
Corporate Family Rating and probability of default ratings at B2
and B2-PD respectively but revised its ratings outlook to negative
after announcement of its proposed dividend recapitalization.
Moody's also affirmed the B1 rating on its upsized first lien debt
and the Caa1 rating on its upsized second lien debt. The new loans
along with cash on the balance sheet will be used to finance a
dividend of approximately $450 million to shareholders.

The change in outlook to negative reflects the very high leverage
as a result of the dividend while the company is still turning
around the OneContent and Perceptive acquisitions. The affirmation
of the B2 CFR is bolstered by Hyland's history of successfully
de-leveraging after dividends and acquisitions. Overall organic
growth rates have flattened as a result of the Perceptive and
OneContent acquisitions. Revenues at the Perceptive and OneContent
businesses were declining prior to their acquisition by Hyland in
2017 but are showing early signs of moderating. The outlook can
return to stable if Hyland is able to return to overall organic
growth and free cash flow to debt returns to 5% or greater levels.


RATINGS RATIONALE

Hyland's B2 Corporate Family Rating reflects its high leverage,
acquisition appetite, and aggressive financial policy. The rating
is supported by Hyland's leading niche CSP (Content Services
Platform, formerly referred to as Enterprise Content Management)
market positions and its well-regarded vertical market focused
product offerings. Pro-forma for the upsized debt, Hyland's
leverage is about 7.5x excluding certain one-time expenses (over
8.5x including those expenses). Hyland has the potential to drive
leverage below 7x and free cash flow to debt to above 5% over the
next 12-18 months if it can return to solid organic growth post the
OneContent and Perceptive acquisitions.

Liquidity is good based on an estimated cash balance of $50 million
at close and an undrawn $100 million revolving credit facility as
well as positive free cash flow. Hyland's estimated uses of
liquidity includes annual first lien term loan amortization of 1%
and mandatory debt repayment from excess cash flow. Moody's expects
the company will have sufficient headroom under its springing
covenants to utilize the revolver.

Hyland's capital structure consist of a first lien revolver and
term loan (both rated B1) and a second lien term loan (rated Caa1),
with each rating reflecting the debt position in the capital
structure relative to the B2 corporate family rating.

The negative outlook reflects the continued challenges the company
faces in stabilizing revenues at the Perceptive and OneContent
businesses and returning to 5% free cash flow to debt levels.

Given Hyland's high financial risk tolerance under financial
sponsor ownership, a ratings upgrade is not expected in the near
term. However, Hyland's ratings could be upgraded over time if it
demonstrates a meaningful increase in profits and operating cash
flow and if Moody's believes that the company will maintain
leverage below 5.0x.

The ratings could be downgraded if Hyland's operating performance
deteriorates or if leverage is expected to remain above 7.5x or its
FCF below 5% on other than a temporary basis.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Hyland Software, Inc.

Outlook, Changed to Negative from Stable

Affirmations:

Issuer: Hyland Software, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term Loan Affirmed Caa1 (LGD5 from LGD6)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Revolving Credit Facility Affirmed B1
(LGD3)

Senior Secured 1st Lien Term Loan Affirmed B1 (LGD3)

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Software
Industry published in August 2018.

Headquartered in Westlake, OH, Hyland Software, Inc. provides CSP
software that combines document management, business process
management and records management solutions. Moody's expects Hyland
to generate over $700 million in revenue in 2018. Funds affiliated
to private equity firm Thoma Bravo own a majority common equity
interest in Hyland.


HYLAND SOFTWARE: S&P Lowers ICR to 'B-', Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its issuer credit rating on Westlake,
Ohio-based Hyland Software Inc. to 'B-' from 'B'. The outlook is
stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we lowered our issue-level rating on
the company's first-lien secured debt to 'B-' from 'B'. The '3'
recovery rating remains unchanged, indicating our expectation for
meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%) in the event
of a payment default.

"We also lowered our issue-level rating on the company's
second-lien secured debt to 'CCC' from 'CCC+'. The '6' recovery
rating remains unchanged, indicating our expectation for negligible
recovery (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 5%) in the event of a payment
default."

The downgrade reflects Hyland's pro forma leverage for the
distribution--which was above our downside trigger for the
rating--its aggressive financial policy, and the uncertainty over
its multi-year growth prospects, which could slow the pace of its
deleveraging.

S&P said, "The stable outlook on Hyland reflects our expectation
that the company's leverage will remain above 7x over the next 12
months. Even if the company reduces its leverage below 7x after the
next 12 months, we do not believe it will sustain this reduced
level of leverage because it will likely undertake further
debt-financed dividends or acquisitions. The outlook also reflects
our belief that the company will complete its integration of
Perceptive and OneContent by the end of 2018 with minimal customer
attrition.

"We could lower our rating on Hyland over the next 12 months if its
performance worsens such that its free operating cash flow becomes
breakeven or turns negative. Under such a scenario, we anticipate
that the company would rely on its revolver to fund its liquidity
needs. Increased competition or a lack of innovation in the
company's flagship OnBase software product could also cause its
liquidity to deteriorate.

"We could raise our rating on Hyland if we expect the company to
sustain leverage of less than 7x and a free operating cash
flow-to-debt ratio of more than 5%. This could occur if the company
experiences better-than-expected revenue growth or if we no longer
expect it to undertake large debt-financed acquisitions or
dividends."



HYLAS YACHTS: OIG, LLC Buying Vessel Molds for $156K
----------------------------------------------------
Hylas Yachts, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Maryland to authorize the sale of (i) a 56-foot sailing vessel
mold, and (ii) a powerboat mold set to OIG, LLC, for $156,000.

The Debtor is/was the United States distributor for Hylas Yachts,
which is a trade brand owned by Queen Long Marine Co. Ltd, ("QLM"),
a Taiwan based vessel manufacturer.  These yachts are a robust
ocean going personal sailing yacht, which over the years of their
production have earned a reputation for being sturdy well
manufactured boats, which regularly withstand the rigors of ocean
passages.

The Debtor, the U.S. distributor of Hylas Yachts, at a point in the
late 1990s became a partner on the molds produced which were then
used to manufacture the various Hylas Yachts.  Essentially, HYI
assumed this partnership in the form of a 50% ownership of the
molds with participation in the cost ot creating the molds.

Currently there exist (i) a 70-foot sailing vessel Mold, (ii) a 63
foot sailing vessel Mold, (iii) a 56-foot sailing vessel mold, and
(iv) a powerboat mold set.  The ownership of the sailing vessel
molds has been the subject of a dispute by and between HYI and QLM.
That dispute was resolved in a Settlement Agreement.  The
Settlement Agreement is the subject of a 9019 motion to approve the
settlement terms, which has been filed contemporaneously with the
Motion.

In the Settlement Agreement HYI is left with full ownership of the
56-foot Sailing Vessel molds and the Power boat molds.  The Debtor
has not operated for a little under 2 years and in its current
state of financial distress is unlikely to operate ever again.
Moreover, the molds which are in the far east continue to incur
storage fees and without being utilize, they continue to
deteriorate and will quickly fall into disprepair rendering them
not only useless but a burden to dispose of them, as they are large
items weighing in at severl tons each.

The Debtor now asks to sell ownership of the 56-foot Sailing Vessel
mold and the power boatmold to OIG.  OIG is a new company made up
of investors from the Maryland area that are among other things
Hylas Yacht enthusiasts, which have determined to continue the
production og the 56 foot vessel under a new trade name.

OIG's ownership does not include any of the Jachney family or any
other person whom has owned or operated HYI.  The principles of OIG
are there for at arms length with HYI, although they are not
without some knowledge of the situation that HYI finds itself in.
William Reynolds, the main financial partner in OIG has previously
loaned HYI operating funds and is the principle source of the
funding for the settlement that HYI has agreed to, shipping costs
of over $41,000 and direct payment to QLM of $80,000, with QLM.

In fact it is these funds that OIG wishes to apply to the purchase
of the various molds owned by HYI, assuming the Court were to
approve nunc pro tunc, the settlement with QLM.

HYI desires to sell to OIG the 56-Foot Sailing Vessel molds and the
Powerboat Molds.  The total value to be received by HYI's purposed
sale is $25,000 in legal fees, which is the amount paid to RLC, PA
the undersigned counsel for HYI, the full shipping costs of moving
the molds from QLM to a new facility, approximately $41,000;
$80,000 which will be paid to QLM; 18,500 which QLM will pay to its
creditor, the Annapolis Boat Show, to satisfy one of the Debtor's
outstanding obligations; and $10,000 to be paid to the estate and
preserved solely for claims against the estate.  This equates to
$156,000 of direct value in return for the ownership of the molds
as described.

With the approval of this sale, HYI will have no further hard
assets.  Given this fact estate administration will be extremely
efficient and without further substantial cost.  Moreover the sale
will bring a substantial amount of funding into HYI, i.e. $10,000
which will be preserved for claims against the estate.  Given the
state of affairs of the Debtor, its financial hardships, its lack
of ability to preserve the assets of the estate, the Debtor
believes that the sale as proposed is in the best interests of the
estate and its creditors.

Contemporaneously with the Motion, the counsel for the Debtor has
served a notice of the proposed Settlement Agreement and the
Compromise contemplated herein to all creditors and other parties
in interest in this case in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 2003.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date the
Motion was served.

                       About Hylas Yachts

Hylas Yachts Inc. is a boat dealer in Marblehead, Massachusetts.
Hylas Yachts builds and sells offshore cruising and sailing yachts
46 feet to 66 feet in length. The company was established in 1971
and incorporated in 1998.

Hylas Yachts Inc., based in Marblehead, MA, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-21882) on Sept. 7, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Kyle Jachney, vice president, the Debtor
disclosed $2,780,001 in assets and $2,104,018 in liabilities.  The
Hon. David E. Rice presides over the case.  Tate M. Russack, Esq.,
at RLC Lawyers & Consultants, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


IMMACULATA UNIVERSITY: Fitch Affirms BB Rating on $38.4MM Bonds
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'BB' rating on the following Chester
County Health and Educational Facilities Authority (PA) revenue
bonds, issued on behalf of Immaculata University (Immaculata, the
university):

  -- $38.4 million series 2017.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY

The series 2017 bonds are secured by a lien and security interest
in the pledged revenues of Immaculata.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

PRESSURED ENROLLMENT, OPERATIONS: Immaculata's operating
performance has been pressured by declining enrollment since 2015,
resulting in GAAP-based operating losses of over 9% in fiscal years
2017 and 2018 (unaudited); down from breakeven in fiscal 2014.
Tightened expenses are expected to narrow the loss in fiscal 2019,
despite missing enrollment targets for the second year in a row.

STRATEGIC TRANSITION UNDERWAY: Since 2017, new leadership has been
implementing a strategic plan to reset tuition, improve marketing,
and refocus programming to stabilize and grow enrollment. The
tuition reset and marketing efforts were implemented on schedule;
however, program repositioning intended to attract and retain more
students has been slower than originally expected and is now not
expected to yield results until fiscal 2020.

STEADY LIQUIDITY: Immaculata's available funds (AF; defined as cash
and investments net of permanently restricted net assets) ratios
remain relatively steady despite continued operating pressure, and
compare well for the rating level with approximately 33% AF to
operating expense and 34% AF to debt. Immaculata retains an
additional $8.8 million in permanently restricted funds (unaudited
fiscal 2018).

MANAGEABLE DEBT BURDEN: Immaculata's debt burden is moderate and
the university's debt structure is conservative, made up almost
entirely of the series 2017 fixed rate bonds, which have fairly
level debt service. Further, no additional debt is planned and
Immaculata has no pension exposure.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

EXECUTION OF STRATEGIC EFFORTS: The current rating reflects Fitch's
expectation of successful execution of leadership efforts to grow
enrollment, manage expenses, bringing Immaculata University to
breakeven over the next 12-24 months. Downward rating pressure is
possible should Immaculata's strategic efforts fail to improve
enrollment at levels which narrow its operating losses by fiscal
2020.

CREDIT PROFILE

Located in Chester County, 20 miles west of Philadelphia,
Immaculata University is a Catholic comprehensive, coeducational
institution of higher learning. The school was founded in 1920 in
Malvern by the Sisters, Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary in
1920. It was the first Catholic women's college established in the
Philadelphia area and has since expanded coeducational programs at
all levels. During its nearly 100 year history the university has
produced approximately 22,000 alumni worldwide and currently has
about 2,500 students enrolled in 53 undergraduate majors, seven
master's degree programs, three doctoral degree programs, and over
40 additional professional endorsement, certificate and
certification programs.

OPERATING PROFILE

Immaculata's profile is characteristic of a relatively small
private institution, operating in the competitive broader
Philadelphia market. In recent years, Immaculata has experienced
enrollment pressure, due in some part to its competitive position
in an active market. From fiscals 2015-2018 fall FTE enrollment
declined about 23%, mirrored by a decline in net tuition and fees
of 20% over the same timeframe. As such, Immaculata has operated at
a loss since fiscal 2015.

Despite recent trends, the university's performance has yet to
materially affect liquidity, with available funds remaining largely
steady against operating expenses at about 33% in fiscal 2018. Its
investment mix is relatively moderate, made up entirely of equities
and money market funds with no level III assets. Immaculata's total
endowment has grown from about $16 million in fiscal 2013 to nearly
$20 million in fiscal 2018.

STRATEGIC EFFORTS

Immaculata has been undertaking a meaningful shift in its strategy
since early fiscal 2017, including a right-sizing of its operating
expense base (which included layoffs), an evaluation of current and
future programmatic offerings, a tuition reset to bring it more in
line with competing institutions, and an overhaul of its marketing
and public relations efforts.

These initiatives have had mixed results to date. Expenses
decreased in fiscal 2018, though not to the extent originally
planned, and enrollment growth efforts have lagged. The 'BB' rating
reflects the risk of execution.

For fall 2018, enrollment has declined in what management had
planned to be a year of stabilization or modest growth. Management
reports that a large part of the decrease is due to the slow
implementation of newer allied health programs, which competing
institutions offer. Efforts to attract and retain this student
group are expected to gain traction by fiscal 2020. The fall 2018
unofficial headcount is about 2,400, including adult learning
enrollees, approximately 200 students shy of expectations.

DEBT PROFILE

Immaculata has $38 million in fixed rate debt outstanding, made up
entirely of the series 2017 refunding bonds with a cash funded debt
service reserve fund. Maximum annual debt service is estimated at
$2.4 million, occurring in 2023, and debt service is largely level.
Immaculata's pension obligations are limited to a defined
contribution pension plan.

Fitch calculated a thin 1.0x current debt service coverage for
fiscal 2018. Immaculata reported 2.8x debt service coverage per its
covenant for fiscal 2018, which is unaudited. This is well -above
the required 1.1x covenant test, which increases to 1.2x in fiscal
2019. The substantially higher coverage based on the covenant
calculation is from the recognition of non-operating activities,
which Fitch does not count towards funds available for debt
service.

DISCLOSURE

Immaculata will provide annual disclosure within 150 days of fiscal
year end, to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's EMMA
system. Disclosure to Fitch has been timely, with good access to
management.


INPIXON: Chicago Ventures Reports 9.99% Stake as of Oct. 11
-----------------------------------------------------------
Chicago Venture Partners, LP, Chicago Venture Management, LLC, CVM,
Inc., and John M. Fife disclosed in a Schedule 13G filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Oct. 11, 2018, they
beneficially owned 5,691,293 shares of common stock of Inpixon,
which constitutes 9.99 percent based on 56,941,358 shares of issued
and outstanding common stock as reported on Issuer's Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Oct. 5, 2018.  A
full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/FUgqYV

                         About Inpixon

Headquartered in Palo Alto, California, Inpixon is a technology
company that helps to secure, digitize and optimize any premises
with Indoor Positioning Analytics (IPA) for businesses and
governments in the connected world.  Inpixon Indoor Positioning
Analytics is based on new sensor technology that finds all
accessible cellular, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and RFID signals anonymously.
Paired with a high-performance, data analytics platform, this
technology delivers visibility, security and business intelligence
on any commercial or government premises world-wide.  Inpixon's
products, infrastructure solutions and professional services group
help customers take advantage of mobile, big data, analytics and
the Internet of Things (IoT).

Inpixon reported a net loss of $35.03 million on $45.13 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net
loss of $27.50 million on $53.16 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Inpixon had $24.89
million in total assets, $22.27 million in total liabilities and
$2.61 million in total stockholders' equity.

Marcum LLP, in New York, the Company's auditor since 2012, issued a
"going concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, citing that the
Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred
significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

                     Nasdaq Noncompliance

Inpixon received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Staff of
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC on May 17, 2018, indicating that, based
upon the closing bid price of the Company's common stock for the
last 30 consecutive business days beginning on April 5, 2018 and
ending on May 16, 2018, the Company no longer meets the requirement
to maintain a minimum bid price of $1 per share, as set forth in
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).  In accordance with Nasdaq Listing
Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Company has been provided a period of 180
calendar days, or until Nov. 13, 2018, in which to regain
compliance.


INVESTMENT ENERGY: Fitch Assigns BB- LT IDRs, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned first-time 'BB-' Long-Term Foreign and
Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings to Investment Energy
Resources Limited. Fitch has also assigned a 'BB-(EXP)' rating to
IERL's proposed senior unsecured notes. The Rating Outlook is
Stable.

IERL's ratings reflect its strong business profile characterized by
long-term USD-denominated contracts and a modest cost structure.
The ratings are pressured by the company's exposure to the weak
operating environments of Nicaragua (B/Negative Outlook) and
Honduras. Fitch's assessment of transfer and convertibility risk
for these countries is consistent with the 'B' level, which IERL
offsets with its diverse geographic footprint and insurance from
the World Bank's Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency on some
of its generation companies (GenCos). IERL's proposed issuance will
include a contingent guarantee from a sister hydroelectric GenCo,
Renace S.A. The assigned ratings do not consider any cash flow
contribution from or assets of that entity, although the combined
risk profile of IERL and Renace would be consistent with the 'BB'
category.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Stable Cash Flows from Dollar-Denominated Contracts: IERL's GenCos
operate under USD-denominated contracts with an average life of
more than 16 years. Customers under the contracts are obligated to
purchase 100% of generation. In Honduras and Nicaragua, the IERL
has insurance from the World Bank's Multilateral Investment
Guarantee Agency (MIGA). This insurance protects against transfer
and convertibility risk, civil disruption, and expropriation. In
the case of IERL's Honduran contracts the MIGA guarantees further
protect against breach of contract. The current value of these
policies in aggregate is around USD140 million, with an additional
USD15 million available under standby amounts. Historically, the
World Bank's participation in negotiating with the counterparty has
obviated the need to execute the insurance policy. Although Renace
has some exposure to the spot market, it is also highly contracted,
with contracts for approximately 64% of its firm capacity.

Adequate Leverage, Tight Liquidity: IERL's leverage between 4.5x
and 5.0x through Fitch's rating horizon is consistent with the 'BB'
category and compares favorably to similarly rated peers. IERL's
coverage ratios, on the other hand, are significantly weaker than
peers, averaging around 2.5x through the rating horizon. If Renace
is added to the structure, it would likely be viewed as marginally
credit positive and with a neutral rating impact. The combination
of the two entities would result in slight deterioration in metrics
but would improve overall geographic risk profile. Under Fitch's
model, which uses a blend of P90 and P75 scenarios, the combined
coverage would still remain at or below 3.0x through the medium
term, which is low for the 'BB' category. This is offset by both
IERL's moderate leverage and its manageable operating costs.

Geographic Diversification Reduces Country Risk: IERL's rating is
supported by a broad geographic footprint throughout Central
America, with 394MW of installed capacity across three countries:
Honduras, Nicaragua, (B/Negative Outlook) and Costa Rica
(BB/Negative Outlook). Additionally, its sister company Renace
S.A., which would provide a contingent guarantee on the proposed
issuance, has 246MW of installed hydroelectric capacity in
Guatemala (BB/Stable), and is in the process of adding a further
55MW of capacity to Renace. The diversity of cash flows partially
offsets the company's exposure to the weak operating environments
of Honduras and Nicaragua, which pressures company's foreign
currency rating and increases business risk.

Conservative Cost Structure: Under Fitch's projections, IERL's
modest operating costs are expected to result in gross margins of
around 50%. Additionally, the shareholder's organizational strategy
ringfences greenfield expansions from fully operational GenCos,
resulting in a high degree of predictability on capex and limited
investment requirements for IERL. This expansion strategy would
focus on developing wind, solar, and hydro assets outside of IERL's
structure, and folding them into it only after GenCos initiate
commercial operations. Certain GenCos in IERL's portfolio have
experienced capacity factor variations of up to 15% during the last
three years. In view of this potential top line volatility, its
limited capital costs and stable operating expenses provide
important mitigation to inherent climatological risk for any given
asset.

Strong Shareholder: Although the assessment under Fitch's Parent
Subsidiary Linkage Criteria does not result in an explicit notching
uplift to IERL, Fitch views positively the strength of the
company's owner Corporacion Multi Inversiones (CMI). CMI is a
family-owned multinational conglomerate with operations throughout
Central America, the Caribbean, and the U.S.. Its operations
include agribusiness, restaurants (including the global chain Pollo
Campero), real estate, electricity generation, finance, and
telecom. CMI's ongoing commitment to growing its energy holdings
supports IERL's underlying credit quality. Fitch considers IERL's
recent committed credit facility with Foreign Commerce Bank, a 100%
owned subsidiary of CMI, as a further example of CMI's implicit
support of IERL.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

IERL's deleveraging trajectory of below 5.0x within the rating
horizon puts it comfortably within the 'BB' rating category, while
its projected coverage (consistently below 3.0x under Fitch's base
case) is more in line with the 'B' category. By comparison,
regional peers tend to exhibit weaker or comparable leverage, but
significantly stronger coverage ratios. Orazul Energy Peru S.A.'s
(BB/Stable) leverage is projected to be at or above 5.0x through
the rating horizon, with coverage above 6.0x. Fenix Power Peru
S.A.'s credit metrics are considered in line with a 'BB' before
receiving a two-notch uplift due to strong shareholder support from
Colbun S.A. (BBB/Stable). Its leverage is also relatively high at
6.6x at year-end 2017, but benefits from an amortizing debt profile
that is expected to reduce this metric to below 4.0x within the
medium term. As with Orazul, Fenix presents strong interest
coverage ratios of above 4.0x at YE2017, improving to above 6.0x
over the next four years. Nautilus Inkia Holdings LLC also has
reported high leverage historically (7.0x at YE17), but as with its
Peruvian peers is expected to deleverage to below 5.0x within the
next several years.

Compared to other speculative grade peers in the region, IERL
maintains a particularly diversified asset portfolio supported by
exceptionally long-term contracts (average weighted life of more
than 16 years). Fenix and Orazul both have single country exposure,
which is partially mitigated by Peru's strong operating
environment. Inkia offsets weaker metrics with a broad geographic
footprint that covers nine countries throughout Latin America,
including Peru (BBB+/Stable), Chile (A/Stable), and Panama
(BBB/Stable). IERL's comparatively diverse portfolio is hampered by
exposure to relatively weak operating environments, particularly
Honduras and Nicaragua (B/Negative Outlook), putting additional
downward pressure on its overall risk profile. A similar dynamic
exists with its Argentine peer, Genneia S.A. (B/Stable). Although
Genneia presents very strong financial metrics relative to its
rating, its unmitigated exposure to Argentina's increasingly weak
operating environment constrains its rating.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Blend of P75 and P90 operating scenarios, depending on
historical performance

  - Construction financing debt replaced by USD550 million
corporate bond

  - Marginal operational efficiencies realized after bond issuance

  - Cash above USD24 million paid as dividends

  - No expansion capex after 2017

  - Rating case does not contemplate cash flows from Guatemalan
operations.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

Fitch does not anticipate a positive rating action in the near or
medium term. Fitch would positively view leverage reduction below
4.5x due to either improved cost efficiencies across its assets or
better contract terms at its GenCos in the medium-term.
Higher-than-anticipated capacity factors would likely be viewed as
credit neutral given the exogenous nature of that variable. A
financial strategy that prioritized greater cash preservation
relative to financial expenses would be viewed as strengthening its
current risk profile. Continued expansion of its geographic
footprint that increased IERL's proportion of moderate- to low-risk
operating environments would be considered credit positive,
provided that this expansion did not result in a material
deterioration of financial metrics.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

Negative rating sensitivities include: deterioration in the
sovereign ratings and/or applicable country ceiling combined with a
significant lag in payments; sustained disruptions in generation
capacity due to either technical or climatological issues,
particularly in conjunction with continued aggressive cash
management policies; significant delays in realizing IERL's
near-term deleveraging trajectory.

LIQUIDITY

Strong Cash Generation, Nominal Cash Retention: IERL's modest cost
structure and minimal investment requirements consistently generate
strong cash flow from operations. At YE2017, IERL's CFO was
approximately USD50 million, against USD49 million of interest
expense paid. Fitch expects the company to maintain or exceed these
levels going forward. At the same time, Fitch expects all cash
above USD24 million to be distributed to IERL's shareholder. It
also expects to use a portion of its restricted cash (approximately
USD99 million at YE2017), to reduce leverage when those funds are
liberated by the proposed debt issuance of USD550. After the
issuance, the company will benefit from a comfortable maturity
schedule, as the bond will replace nearly all its existing
amortizing debt.

The company has finalized a three-year, USD25 million committed
credit line with Foreign Commerce Bank, a 100%-owned subsidiary of
CMI. This materially improves IERL's liquidity profile, providing
coverage of roughly 12 months' operating expenses in conjunction
its existing cash balance.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Investment Energy Resources Limited

The following ratings are being assigned:

  - Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR 'BB-';

  - Long-Term Local Currency IDR 'BB-';

  - Senior unsecured notes rating 'BB-(EXP)'.

The Rating Outlooks are Stable.


IQOR US: Bank Debt Trades at 7% Off
-----------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which iQor US
Incorporated is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 92.63
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.97 percentage points from
the previous week. iQor US pays 500 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $630 million facility. The bank loan matures on
February 20, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'CCC' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


JC PENNEY: Bank Debt Trades at 7% Off
-------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which JC Penney
Corporation is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 92.65
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 0.91 percentage points from
the previous week. JC Penney pays 425 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $1.688 billion facility. The bank loan matures on
June 23, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and Standard & Poor's
gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday,
September 28.


JEFE PLOVER: Tucci Family Trust Buying Reno Property for $505K
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jefe Plover Interests, Ltd., asks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to sell
approximately 0.75 acres of unimproved residential land located at
20322 Bordeaux Drive, Reno, Washoe County, Nevada, being described
more fully as Parcel 207S-1 as shown on Parcel Map No. 4911, for
Thunderbird Nevada Investments, LLC, according to the map thereof,
filed in the office of the County Recorder of Washoe County, State
of Nevada, on May 28, 2008, as File No. 3654220, Official Records,
together with all improvements thereon, if any, and all rights,
privileges, tenements, hereditaments, rights-of-way, appendages and
appurtenances, in anyway appertaining thereto and all right, title,
and interest of Seller in and to any streets, ways, alleys, strips
or gores of land adjoining the property or any part thereof, to the
2008 Tucci Damily Trust and/or its assigns for $505,000 cash.

The Property is subject to liens securing payment of standby fees,
taxes, and assessments to ad valorem taxing authorities for the
fiscal year 2018-2019.  It will be sold free and clear of all
liens, claims, and encumbrances, including, but not limited to, the
Property Tax Liens.  To the best of the Debtor's knowledge, the
amounts necessary to satisfy the Property Tax Liens, and any other
liens against the Property are in the aggregate less than the
proposed sales price.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Property to the Purchaser for the
price described, and upon the terms in the Contract, or to the
highest cash bidder, free and clear of all liens, claims, and
encumbrances, and from the proceeds of such sale:

     a) pay usual and customary closing costs, including, but not
limited to, the premium for the owner policy of title insurance for
the insured amount equal to the Purchase Price, the Debtor's half
of the escrow fee, etc.;

     b) pay the holder(s) of the Property Tax Liens an amount
sufficient to secure the release of said liens for the fiscal years
prior to 2018-2019, along with providing the Buyer a credit against
the Purchase Price for a pro rata share of the 2018-2019 ad valorem
taxes up through the date of the closing, however, if the 2018-2019
ad valorem taxes are due and owing at the time of the closing, same
will be paid from the proceeds of the sale and the Debtor will
receive a credit from the Buyer for a pro rata share of the
2018-2019 ad valorem taxes from the date of closing through the end
of 2018-2019 fiscal year; and

     c) pay a real estate commission of 6% of the gross purchase
price paid for the Property to Brooke Sullivan of Dickson Realty, a
real estate agent whose employment by the Debtor has been approved
by the Court.

The disbursements made from the funds constituting the Purchase
Price will be deemed the disbursement of money or turnover of
money, whether paid by the escrow officer closing the sale on
behalf of the Debtor or by the Debtor directly, to parties in
interest.

The fiscal year of closing ad valorem tax lien will be expressly
retained on the Property until the payment by the Purchaser and/or
its assigns of the year of closing taxes, plus any penalties or
interest which may ultimately accrue thereon, in the ordinary
course of business.

The Debtor asks that the Court specifically orders that the
provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) do not apply to the order
issued approving the sale of the Property.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/Jefe_Plover_34_Sales.pdf

If any party wishes to make a higher net cash offer for the
Property, such offer should be directed to the Debtor prior to the
hearing on the Motion; the party and/or its representative should
attend the hearing on the Motion and bring at least $15,000 made
payable to First Centennial Title Escrow Account to serve as a cash
deposit to be placed with the escrow officer and thereafter applied
to the payment of the Purchase Price.

If a higher cash offer is received, the Debtor reserves the right
to sell the Property to the highest cash bidder at the time of
hearing, subject to the Court's approval.  Higher bids will only be
accepted by the Debtor in increments of at least $5,000.  If the
Highest Bidder fails to close on the purchase of the Property for
any reason other than the Seller's default, then the Highest
Bidder's $15,000 cash deposit will be forfeited to the Seller.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 25, 2018 at 9:30 a.m.

                About Jefe Plover Interests

Jefe Plover Interests, Ltd., based in Dallas, Texas, is engaged in
activities related to real estate.  Jefe Plover is affiliated with
Forest Park Medical Center at Southlake and Forest Park Medical
Center, LLC.

Jefe Plover Interests filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 18-32722) on Aug. 15, 2018.  The petition was signed by
Jeffrey H. Mims, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of
Wade Neal Barker, Case No. 18-32014-sgj7. The Hon. Stacey G.
Jernigan presides over the case.

Charles Brackett Hendricks, Esq., at Cavazos Hendricks Poirot,
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.



JLAN PROPERTIES: Taps David J. Harris as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
JLAN Properties, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to hire the Law Office of
David J. Harris as its legal counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; participate in negotiation with its creditors;
represent the Debtor in contested or adversarial matters; and
provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

David Harris, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
disclosed in a court filing that he and his firm do not hold any
interest, which may be affected by their representation of the
Debtor.

The firm can be reached through:

     David J. Harris, Esq.
     Law Office of David J. Harris
     69 Public Square, Suite 700
     Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701
     Tel: 570 823-9400
     Fax: 570 208-1400
     Email: dh@lawofficeofdavidharris.com

                     About JLAN Properties

JLAN Properties, LLC, is a privately-held operator of
nonresidential buildings.

JLAN Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 18-04205) on October 4,
2018.  In the petition signed by Linda Teberio, managing member,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities
of less than $1 million.  

Judge John J. Thomas presides over the case.


JOHN CARROLL: Maple Buying Santa Barbara Property for $2.5M
-----------------------------------------------------------
John M. Carroll, III, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to authorize the sale of the
residential property commonly known as 5219 E. Camino Cielo, Santa
Barbara, California to Maple Equity, LLC, or nominee for
$2,519,000, subject to higher and better offers.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 23, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.

One of the assets of the estate is the Property.  The Debtor has
negotiated to sell the Property to the Buyer.  Although the Debtor
had at one time received an offer at a higher price, that offer has
not closed.  Therefore, this is the highest and best viable offer
the Debtor currently has for the property and the Debtor believes
the offer is not disproportionate to the value of the asset.

The terms of sale are set forth in that certain Residential
Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions together with
Seller's Counter Offer.  The motion is for a sale of property.  

The sale is in the best interests of the estate.  It is not
disproportionate to the value of the estate's interest in the
property.  The property was marketed to the general public.  The
Debtor had received an offer at a higher price, but that offer did
not close.  The Buyer is a party not affiliated with the Debtor.  

The sale is appropriate for overbidding.  If any interested party
wishes to overbid, the Trustee recommends that the Court accepts
overbids, with a minimum overbid to be at least $10,000 above the
proposed purchase price, and further overbids in increments of
$10,000.  Any interested overbidder should contact the undersigned
to ensure he, she, they or it is appropriately qualified to bid.

The Debtor has employed a real estate professional who has procured
the sale.  The approved listing agreement and application call for
a 6% commission on the sale.  The proceeds of sale net of selling
costs will be disbursed to the Class 1 creditor under the Plan,
then to the Class 2, 3 and 4 creditors in the order of their
priority.  The sale as noticed will not pay the Class 2 claim in
full, so approval of the Class 2 creditor is necessary to close
escrow.  As provided for under the terms of the confirmed Plan, the
sale will be free and clear of any unpaid balance of the secured
claims on the property, namely the Class 1, 2, 3 and 4 claims.

For the foregoing reasons, the Debtor asks that the Court (i)
approves the proposed overbid procedures and the Property; (ii)
authorizes him to pay a real estate commission in the amount of 6%
of the selling price to the Bartron Group of Berkshire Hathaway
Home Services; (iii) authorizes him to pay the Seller's usual and
customary expenses of escrow; and (iv) waives the requirements of
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/John_Carroll_217_Sales.pdf

John M. Carroll sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case
No. 16-11261) on July 5, 2016.  The Debtor tapped William C Beall,
Esq., at Beall and Burkhardt, APC, as counsel.


JP INTERMEDIATE: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 Corporate Family Rating and
a B3-PD Probability of Default Rating to JP Intermediate B, LLC,
the indirect parent of The Juice Plus Company, LLC. Juice Plus is a
direct seller of whole-food, plant based nutritional supplements.
At the same time Moody's assigned B2 ratings to the company's
proposed credit facilities. These include a $50 million senior
secured first lien revolving credit facility and a $438 million
secured first lien term loan. The proceeds from the term loan, a
$105 million seller note (not rated), $542 million of common equity
and $150 million of preferred equity will be used to finance the
purchase of Juice Plus by private equity firm Altamont Capital. The
rating outlook is stable.

Moody's assigned the following ratings to JP Intermediate B, LLC:

JP Intermediate B, LLC

Corporate Family Rating at B3

Probability of Default at B3-PD

$50 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility
expiring 2023 at B2 (LGD3)

$438 senior secured first lien term loan due 2025 at B2 (LGD3)
The rating outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 CFR reflects Juice Plus' narrow product line of nutritional
supplements, the focus on a supplements industry that is highly
competitive and subject to changing consumer preferences, as well
as the inherent risks related to its multi-level marketing business
model. The company's multi-level marketing structure creates risk
of adverse regulatory and/or legal actions that affect the
company's business and sales practices.

The rating is also constrained by the company's high financial
leverage (debt/EBITDA will be roughly 5.1x at close of the LBO)
following its acquisition by Altamont. Financial policies are
expected to be aggressive under private equity ownership. The
preferred stock also creates event risk because features such as
investor put rights and a high coupon that can be paid in cash if
leverage as defined in the credit agreement is below 3.5x, may lead
to a debt-funded redemption. Debt-to-EBITDA is roughly 6.5x at
close if the preferred stock is included in debt. Moody's expects
leverage to improve modestly to about 4.7x (excluding the preferred
stock) by 2020 reflecting modest earnings growth and debt paydown.
The rating is supported by the company's good profitability and
cash flow, as well as solid industry dynamics driven by an
increasing trend towards wellness by consumers. Juice Plus' strong
double digit revenue growth over the last four years demonstrates
the ability to attract new customers to a product line that is
priced at a premium to most other nutritional supplements. The
company also has a good presence in Europe's developed markets with
56% of revenue generated outside the US. Moody's nevertheless
expects revenue growth to slow to a mid single digit range, and
demand is also vulnerable to cyclical downturns.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that Juice Plus will
continue to face the fundamental risks of the multi-level marketing
business model. The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's view
that the company will reduce financial leverage over the next 12-18
months through debt repayment, modest revenue growth and stable
margins, and that Juice Plus will generate comfortably positive
free cash flow and maintain good liquidity.

The ratings could be downgraded if Juice Plus' operating
performance deteriorates, if the number of distributors or sales
representative counts decline or turnover increases meaningfully,
if cash flow weakens or turns negative or if there is an adverse
shift in the industry's regulatory environment. Ratings could also
be downgraded if debt/EBITDA is sustained above 6.5x, or if
liquidity deteriorates.

The rating could be upgraded if the company continues to grow
revenue, profitability improves, and the regulatory environment
remains stable. The rating could also be upgraded if debt to EBITDA
is sustained below 4.0x and Moody's gains greater comfort with the
company's business model.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global Packaged
Goods published in January 2017.

Based in Collierville, TN The Juice Plus Company is a direct-seller
of whole-food, plant based nutritional supplements (98% of revenue)
and growing products. Products are available in a variety of
delivery formats including capsules, soft chewables (gummies),
shakes and bars. The company operates through a multi-level
marketing system that consists of approximately active 142,000
distributors in the US and a number of international markets. Juice
Plus generates about $750 million in revenue per annum and will be
a portfolio company of Altamont Capital.


K.E. MARTIN: Colonial Funding Prohibits Use of Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------------
Colonial Funding Network, Inc., as servicing provider for Core
Business Finance, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida to prohibit K.E. Martin Development of
Pasco, Inc., from using the purchased receivables, and direct K.E.
Martin to turnover the purchased receivables to Colonial.

The Debtor and Core Business Finance entered into a Revenue Based
Factoring Agreement.  Under the Agreement, the Debtor sold $345,000
worth of future receipts, accounts, and contract rights to Core
Business Finance in exchange for the immediate payment of $250,000.
Accordingly, Core Business Finance is the absolute owner of
Debtor's accounts receivables until it is paid in full.  The Debtor
defaulted on July 12, 2018, and still owes Colonial $83,066 as of
the petition date.  Colonial's lien is in second position behind a
$14,808 scheduled claim of SunTrust Bank.  Colonial asserts a
blanket lien on all of Debtor's assets, including accounts,
accounts receivable, and cash on hand and in deposit in banks.

Since the Debtor has transferred all rights, title, and interest in
its receivables to Colonial, and does not retain legal or equitable
interest in the Purchased Receivables, Colonial asserts that the
Purchased Receivables are not property of the estate and may not be
used for the estate's benefit.  The receivables the Debtor is
collecting are therefore not cash collateral which the Debtor may
utilize under Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Rather, the
Debtor is improperly utilizing and converting Colonial's asset, and
Debtor is obligated to turnover the Purchased Receivables to
Colonial.

However, in the event that the Court does permit the Debtor's use
of the Purchased Receivables, Colonial requests the Court to
require Debtor to provide Colonial with sufficient protections and
assurances.  Specifically, the Court should require that:

     (a) The Debtor must operate strictly in accordance with a
budget and spend cash collateral not to exceed 5% above the amount
shown in the budget.  The debtor must provide Colonial with monthly
reports which reflect its actual receipts and expenditures for the
prior month.  The Court should not authorize the disposition of any
prepetition Collateral outside the ordinary course of business
without the prior written consent of Colonial, and Debtor should
not diminish the value of the Collateral below that which existed
on the petition date.

     (b) The Debtor must make monthly adequate protection payments
to Colonial in an amount sufficient to protect Colonial's interest
during the time Debtor is permitted to use Colonial's property.

     (c) As additional adequate protection, the Debtor must provide
Colonial with first priority, postpetition replacement liens.

     (d) Colonial must be entitled to an administrative expense
claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 507(b) to the extent the adequate
protection proves insufficient and/or does not offset any
diminution of value in Colonial's property.

     (e) The Debtor must maintain insurance coverage for the
Purchased Receivables and all other collateral securing Colonial's
interests and name Colonial as loss payee and certificate holder to
such policy.  The Debtor must maintain insurance coverage of its
property in accordance with its obligations under the Agreement.
The Debtor must provide proof of insurance upon request.

     (f) Upon reasonable notice, Debtor must grant Colonial access
to Debtor's business records and premises for inspection.

     (g) The Debtor must timely perform all obligations of a
debtor-in-possession required by the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and orders of the Court.

     (h) Unless waived by Colonial in writing, the Debtor must
immediately cease using Colonial's property upon the occurrence of
one of the following Event of Default: (i) if a trustee is
appointed in this Chapter 11 case; (ii) if the Debtor breaches any
term or condition of the Order or the Agreement, other than
defaults existing as of the Petition Date; (iii) if the case is
converted to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code; or (iv)
if the case is dismissed.

     (i) The Debtor must promptly provide to Colonial such
additional or other financial information as Colonial may from time
to time reasonably request.

     (j) The Debtor must waive any claim under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 506
and Colonial must not be subject to the equitable doctrine of
marshaling.

Attorneys for Colonial Funding Network, Inc.

         J. Ryan Yant, Esq.
         Donald R. Kirk, Esq.
         Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A.
         P.O. Box 3239
         Tampa, FL 33601-3239
         Telephone: (813) 229-4925
         Facsimile: (813) 229-4133
         E-mail: ryant@carltonfields.com
                 dkirk@carltonfields.com

              About K.E. Martin Development of Pasco

K.E. Martin Development of Pasco, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-06979) on Aug. 20, 2018.  In the petition signed by Kenneth E.
Martin, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
less than $50,000.  The Debtor is represented by Michael C.
Markham, Esq. of Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns LLP.


KEITH BLACK: $21K Sale of Interest in Assets to Jios Denied
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ernest M. Robles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California denied without prejudice Keith Black Racing
Engines, Inc.'s of its interest in specific items of its machinery
and equipment to Jios Sales, Inc., for $20,500, subject to
overbid.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

The Debtor proposed to sell the machinery and equipment free and
clear of all claims and liens.

The Tentative Opinion is adopted as the ruling of the Court.  The
Evidentiary Objections are overruled.

A copy of the list of Assets proposed to be sold to the Motion is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Keith_Black_23_Sales.pdf

                  About Black Racing Engines

Keith Black Racing Engines, Inc., based in South Gate, California,
is a manufacturer of engines supplies equipment and parts.  Black
Racing Engines filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case
No. 18-17000) on June 18, 2018.  In the petition signed by Kenneth
Black, president, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The case is
assigned to the Hon. Ernest M. Robles.  Vanessa M. Haberbush, Esq.,
at HABERBUSH & ASSOCIATES, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


KING & QUEEN: Piccadilly Buying Baltimore Property for $72K
-----------------------------------------------------------
King & Queen, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Maryland to authorize the sale of the real property located at
1155 Washington Blvd., Baltimore, Maryland to Piccadilly
Enterprises, Inc., for $72,000.

The Debtor is the owner of the Property.  The Property has secured
claims totaling approximately $44,229.  

The Debtor has an executed contract to sell the Property to the
Buyer for $72,000.  Pursuant to 14-805(a) of the Tax Property
Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, Baltimore City has
various liens secured by the Property as part of assorted proofs of
claim totaling $44,229.  The Debtor asks entry of an Order
approving the sale of the Property, free and clear of liens, claims
and other interests.

The asks the Court to authorize the distribution and delivery to
Baltimore City $44,229 from the sale of the Property, and grant a
deed conveying fee simple title free and clear of all liens, claims
and encumbrances for the Property to the Buyer.  The Debtor
believes that good cause exists for the Court to approve the
proposed Sale.  Any and all liens on the Property attach to the
sale proceeds.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 19, 2018 at 11:30 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Oct. 12, 2018.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/King_&_Queen_29_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

          PICCADILLY ENTERPRISES, INC.
          9202 Tuckahoe Lane
          Adelphi, MD 20783

                       About King & Queen

King & Queen, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-11484) on Feb. 4, 2018.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge Robert A. Gordon presides
over the case.  The Debtor hired Jeffrey M. Sirody & Associates as
its legal counsel.

The Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan and disclosure
statement on Sept. 17, 2018.



KOLATH HOTELS: Dist. Court Upholds Ruling in Favor of Greene County
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned KOLATH HOTELS AND CASINOS, INC., Appellant,
v. COUNTY OF GREENE, NEW YORK, Appellee, No. 1:17-cv-883 (GLS)
(N.D.N.Y.), Appellant Kolath Hotels and Casinos, Inc. appeals from
an order of the Bankruptcy Court, which granted appellee County of
Greene, New York's motion for judgment on partial findings after a
bench trial. Upon deliberation, Senior District Judge Gary L.
Sharpe affirms the Bankruptcy Court's order.

The controversy centers around Kolath's former property in the Town
of Catskill, which previously included an operational hotel. Since
December 2013, the property has been condemned as an unsafe
structure because it lacked basic building services required for
human habitation. Given Kolath's failure to pay property taxes,
there was an aggregate unpaid balance due to the County in the
approximate amount of $830,000.

Kolath argues that reversal is required because Bankruptcy Court
clearly erred "in ruling that [it] failed to produce evidence to
establish that it was insolvent on the date of the transfer of the
[p]roperty to the County; and [it] received less than a reasonably
equivalent value in exchange for such transfer of the [p]roperty to
the County." Specifically, Kolath argues that Bankruptcy Court
overlooked evidence establishing that (1) the value of the property
was either $3,900,00 or $1,872,000 on the vesting date, so the
County's purchase price of $830,000 resulted in it receiving less
than a reasonably equivalent value for the property and (2) Kolath
had debts totaling $4,395,290.42 which surpassed the assessed value
of its sole property, proving it was insolvent on the vesting date.
However, the record is clear that Bankruptcy Court did not
overlook any evidence, rather it appropriately found that the
evidence was entitled to no deference.

Kolath's alternative reliance on the estimated property value of
$1,872,0003 derived from the stipulation of settlement in the May
2016 Greene County Court case is misplaced for the reasons stated
by the County, which this court now adopts, including that there
was no evidence presented regarding (1) how the estimate from the
stipulation of settlement was calculated; (2) the market trends
between the date on which the estimated valuation was calculated
and the subsequent vesting date; (3) whether the condition of the
property was constant between the valuation date and the vesting
date; or (4) how this valuation reconciles with other conflicting
estimates in the record, like Annie Kolath's verification that the
value of the property was actually much lower. Given these
uncertainties, the Bankruptcy Court aptly described Kolath's
proffered appraisal as "horse trading" by "two sides, both with
something to gain or lose."

The lack of reliable evidence concerning the property's value on
the vesting date, are enough to refute Kolath's arguments.
Moreover, it was not clear error to conclude that Kolath's reliance
on the stipulation to prove its insolvency was unavailing given
that the stipulation does not demonstrate the actual unpaid balance
of any other secured indebtedness that may have been encumbering
the property on the vesting date. Likewise, Kolath's insistence
that its complaint proved that it did not have any other assets is
not convincing. There was simply no reliable evidence presented at
trial that Kolath was insolvent on the vesting date or made
insolvent by the transfer of the property to the County.

In sum, Bankruptcy Court considered all of the evidence presented
by Kolath and properly found that it failed to satisfy its burden
of proof with regard to both of the required elements under 11
U.S.C. section 548. In the absence of any clear error, the court
affirms.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated Sept. 28,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2PyI3qK from Leagle.com.

Kolath Hotels and Casinos, Inc., Appellant, represented by Matthew
J. Sgambettera, The Sgambettera Law Firm & Richard H. Weiskopf --
Rweiskopf@delolaw.com --  DeLorenzo Law Firm.

County of Greene, New York, Appellee, represented by Edward I.
Kaplan, Greene County Attorney, John Michael Dubuc, Schiller, Knapp
Law Firm -- Latham Office & Paul J. Goldman, Goldman Attorneys
PLLC.

Based in Albany, New York Kolath Hotels and Casinos, Inc. filed for
chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No.
16-12061) on November 14, 2016, with total assets at $3.97 million
and total liabilities at $4.57 million. The petition was signed by
Annie Kolath, president.


LB STEEL: Court Rules Against Walsh, Carlo Steel for $4.7MM Claim
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant, LB Steel, LLC, and cross-appellants, Walsh Construction
Company, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, and
Carlo Steel Corporation, appeal from orders of the circuit court of
Cook County entered in consolidated cases involving a construction
project at O'Hare International Airport. On appeal, LB Steel
contends that the circuit court erred by (1) setting-off certain
judgments entered in its favor against a judgment entered in favor
of Walsh, and (2) failing to reduce Walsh's judgment by the value
of a payment from its insurer, Zurich American Insurance Company.
Additionally, LB Steel contends that Walsh's judgment must be
reduced by the amount due under its policy with another insurer,
St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. In their respective
cross-appeals, Walsh, Travelers, and Carlo Steel fix additional
issues for review.

After a thorough analysis, the Appellate Court of Illinois
dismisses the cross-appeal of Carlo Steel; affirms the circuit
court's judgment in part; reverses it in part; enters a judgment in
LB Steel's favor against Walsh and Carlo Steel for $4,771,688 on LB
Steel's claim for quantum meruit; and remands.

In this case, LB Steel introduced no evidence at trial to establish
the value that Walsh allegedly received from its partial
performance under the Sub-Subcontract. However, the record shows
that before the trial court entered the Judgment Order, the parties
agreed that Walsh and Carlo Steel had retained a total of
$4,771,688 due to LB Steel under the Sub-Subcontract following the
discovery of cracks in the welding. Counsel for Walsh submitted
that, although Walsh was entitled "to withhold that payment under
the contract because of the defective work," LB Steel "would be
entitled to reduce" the judgment entered against it by that sum if
Walsh were to be "made whole." The trial court, as noted, entered
judgment in favor of Walsh for $27.5 million on Count I of its
Second Amended Third-Party Complaint for breach of contract by LB
Steel, and for the reasons we have explained, we have reversed the
judgment entered in favor of LB Steel on its breach of contract
claim against Walsh and Carlo Steel. It follows that the $4,771,688
which Walsh retained under the Sub-Subcontract constitutes "value
received *** over and above the injury" that it sustained due to LB
Steel's breach of contract; that sum, which is liquidated and
admitted by Walsh, constitutes LB Steel's measure of recovery under
a theory of quantum meruit. Therefore, we reverse the trial court's
judgment in favor of Walsh and against LB Steel on LB Steel's
claims for quantum meruit raised in Count III of its Third Amended
Complaint in case number 05 CH 2675 and Count III of its
Counterclaim in case number 07 L 3886. The Court enters judgment in
LB Steel's favor against Walsh and Carlo Steel for $4,771,688 on
those two counts.

Because the Court finds that each of the setoffs imposed by the
trial court must be reversed, the Court need not reach LB Steel's
additional contention that setoff was improper due to the notice of
attorneys' lien filed by its trial counsel, Conway & Mrowiec, and
the lien alleged by MB Financial. However, as the Court has entered
judgment in favor of LB Steel and against Carlo Steel and Walsh on
LB Steel's quantum meruit claims, the Court remands the cause to
the trial court for a hearing on whether or to what extent the
judgment in favor of LB Steel on its quantum meruit claims should
be offset against the judgment in favor of Walsh on its breach of
contract claim.

In summary: (1) the judgment entered in favor of Walsh and against
LB Steel for $27.5 million on Count I for breach of contract from
Walsh's Second Amended Third-Party Complaint is affirmed; (2) the
judgment entered in favor of LB Steel and against Walsh on Count IV
for fraud from Walsh's Second Amended Third-Party Complaint is
affirmed; (3) the $6.5 million judgment entered in favor of LB
Steel and against Carlo Steel and Walsh on LB Steel's claim for
breach of contract raised in Count II of its Third Amended
Complaint and Count I of its Counterclaim is reversed; (4) the $6.5
million judgment entered in favor of LB Steel and the City for the
use and benefit of LB Steel and against Travelers on LB Steel's
public construction bond claim raised in Count V of its Third
Amended Complaint and Count IV of its Counterclaim is reversed; (6)
the $1,554,654 judgment entered in favor of LB Steel and against
Walsh on LB Steel's claim for a lien against public funds raised in
Count I of its Third Amended Complaint and Count II of its
Counterclaim is reversed; (7) the judgment entered in favor of LB
Steel for the $1,812,696 deposited with the clerk of the circuit
court by Cal Testing, raised in Count VI of LB Steel's
Counterclaim, its counterclaim for the interpleaded funds, and its
Second Amended Complaint against Cal Testing, is affirmed; (8) the
trial court's order releasing the $1,812,696 to Walsh is reversed;
(9) the judgment entered in favor of Walsh and against LB Steel on
LB Steel's claim for quantum meruit raised in Count III of its
Third Amended Complaint and Count III of its Counterclaim is
reversed, and judgment is entered in favor of LB Steel and against
Walsh and Carlo Steel for $4,771,688 on those counts; (10) the
judgment entered in favor of Walsh and Carlo Steel and against LB
Steel on LB Steel's claim for unjust enrichment raised in Count VI
of its Third Amended Complaint is affirmed; and (11) each setoff
imposed by the trial court is reversed. Carlo Steel's appeal is
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and the cause is remanded for
further proceedings.

The case is in re: LB STEEL, LLC, and THE CITY OF CHICAGO ex rel.
LB STEEL, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. CARLO STEEL CORPORATION; WALSH
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; THE CITY OF CHICAGO; and TRAVELERS CASUALTY
AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants, (LB Steel, LLC,
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee; Carlo
Steel Corporation, Defendant, Counterplaintiff, and
Counterdefendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant; Walsh Construction
Company, Defendant and Counterplaintiff-Appellee and
Cross-Appellant; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America,
Defendant and Counterplaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant). THE
CITY OF CHICAGO, Plaintiff, v. MURPHY/JAHN, INC. ARCHITECTS; WERNER
SOBEK INGENIUERE GmbH & CO. KG; RUBINOS & MESIA ENGINEERS, INC.;
TURNER CONSTRUCTION-O'BRIEN, KREITZBERG, LLC; TURNER CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY; O'BRIEN-KREITZBERG, INC.; URS CORPORATION; McCLIER
CORPORATION d/b/a O'Hare Partners; AAC DESIGNERS BUILDERS, INC.
d/b/a Austin AECOM Company; COTTER CONSULTING, INC.; WALSH
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY; BOWMAN, BARRETT & ASSOCIATES, INC.; and
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants,
(Walsh Construction Company, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff,
Third-Party Counterdefendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant;
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America,
Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant; LB Steel, LLC, Third-Party
Defendant and Third-Party Counterplaintff-Appellant and
Cross-Appellee; Carlo Steel, Counterdefendant-Appellee and
Cross-Appellant). LB STEEL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CAL TESTING
SERVICES, INC, d/b/a Calumet Testing Services, Defendant, No.
1-15-3501 (Ill. App.).

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated Sept. 28, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2OoeHPu from Leagle.com.

                   About LB Steel

LB Steel, LLC, provider of outsourced machining, fabrication,
burning, and assembly services, sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 15-35358) on Oct. 18, 2015.
Michael Goich signed the petition as president.

The Debtor has engaged Perkins Coie LLP as counsel; Nisen &
Elliott, and Crane Heyman Simon Welch & Clar, both as special
counsel; Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Garden
City Group LLC as notice, claims and balloting agent.

Judge Janet S. Baer is assigned to the case.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed five creditors to serve on
the official committee of unsecured creditors. The creditors are
Janco Steel LTD, Welding Industrial Supply Co., SSAB Americas, The
Walsh Group and EVRAZ North America.

The unsecured creditors' committee has engaged Duane Morris LLP as
counsel, and Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP as special
counsel.


LIQUIGARD TECHNOLOGIES: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Liquiguard Technologies, Inc. as of Oct. 10,
according to a court docket.

                   About LiquiGuard Technologies

LiquiGuard Technologies, Inc., develops high quality coatings that
are safe to use and easy to apply for any consumer at home or in
the workplace.

LiquiGuard Technologies filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-19449) on Aug.
2, 2018, estimating under $1 million in assets and liabilities.
Susan D. Lasky, Esq., at Susan D. Lasky, P.A., is the Debtor's
counsel.


LOCKWOOD HOLDINGS: Wants to Maintain Exclusivity Until Jan. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------
Lockwood Holdings, Inc. and certain of its affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to extend the
exclusive period to solicit acceptances of the Chapter 11 Plan by
an additional 60 days, from Nov. 2, 2018 to Jan. 1, 2019.

On Aug. 31, 2018, the Debtors and the Committee filed their Joint
Chapter 11 Plan.  Since the filing of the Plan, the Debtors have
been diligently working to close the sales of substantially all of
their assets so that they can focus on winding down their estates.
Thus, the Debtors anticipate filing an amended Plan and Disclosure
Statement by the end of the month.

As set forth in the First Exclusivity Motion, the Debtors believe
that they have satisfied the requirements of section 1121(d), as
well as the factors that courts generally examine when determining
whether to extend a debtor's exclusive periods.  Among other
things, the Debtors have complied with the milestones in the DIP
credit agreement for selling substantially all of their assets and
filed the Plan prior to the expiration of the Filing Exclusivity
Period.

In addition, the Debtors submit that the Court's First Order
extending the exclusivity periods to file a chapter 11 plan and
solicit acceptances thereof was without prejudice to the Debtors'
right to seek additional extensions of their exclusive periods.

Accordingly, the Debtors request that this further extension of the
Solicitation Exclusivity Period be without prejudice to the
Debtors' right to seek additional extensions of such period, and
the rights of other parties in interest to object thereto or to
seek to shorten such period.

                      About Lockwood Holdings

Lockwood Holdings, Inc. -- https://www.lockwoodint.com/ -- is a
privately-owned company headquartered in Houston, Texas, that
offers carbon steel pipe, carbon steel fittings & flanges,
stainless steel pipe, stainless steel fittings & flanges, valves,
valve automation, and engineered products.  The company also
provides services from MRO (maintenance, repair and operations) to
large-scale projects, including design, engineering, automation,
production, QA/QC, documentation, inspection, expedition and field
service.  Other in-house capabilities include light manufacturing
and machining, modification, repair and NDE testing.

Lockwood Holdings, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-30197) on Jan. 18, 2018.  Its affiliates LH
Aviation, LLC (Case No. 18-30198) and Piping Components, Inc. (Case
No. 18-30199) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code on Jan. 24, 2018.

The cases are jointly administered and are pending before Judge
David R Jones.

In the petitions signed by CEO Michael F. Lockwood, Lockwood
Holdings estimated assets in the range of $10 million to $50
million and $50 million to $100 million in debt.  LH Aviation and
Piping Components estimated their assets in the range of $0 to
$50,000 and $50 million to $100 million in debt.

The Debtors tapped Jason S. Brookner, Esq., at Gray Reed & McGraw
LLP as counsel, and Spagnoletti & Co. as their special litigation
counsel.  Imperial Capital, LLC, is the Debtors' investment banker;
and jetAVIVA, LLC, is the aircraft broker.  The Court appointed
Keen-Summit Capital Partners, LLC as the Debtors' real estate
broker, and Imperial Capital, LLC as their investment banker.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The Committee tapped McKool Smith, P.C., as its legal
counsel, and Stout Risius Ross, LLC, as financial advisor.


MEDCISION LLC: Taps Mark D. Boyer as Tax Advisor
------------------------------------------------
MedCision, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of California to hire a tax advisor.

The Debtor proposes to employ the firm of Mark D. Boyer, CPA to
assist in the preparation of corporate income tax returns; assist
in winding up income tax claims; and to consult with the Debtor as
to those matters during its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates range from $60 to $450.  It has estimated
that the fee for the services it is expected to provide will be
approximately $9,000.

Mark Boyer, a certified public accountant, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm neither holds nor represents any interest
adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Mark D. Boyer
     401 E. Mills Avenue
     Breaux Bridge, LA 70517
     Phone: 337.332.0616

                     About MedCision LLC

MedCision LLC develops automation technologies for vital clinical
product handling processes.

MedCision initially filed a voluntary petition for relief pursuant
to Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on Dec. 20, 2017.  By order
dated Feb. 16, 2018, the case was converted to one under Chapter 11
(Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 17-31272).

Judge Hannah L. Blumenstiel presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP as
bankruptcy counsel; Three Twenty-One Capital Partners as its
investment banker; and Kyle Everett of Development Specialists,
Inc., as chief restructuring officer.


MGTF RADIO: Seeks Oct. 19 Cash Collateral Use Extension
-------------------------------------------------------
MGTF Radio Company, LLC and WPNT, Inc., filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Missouri their third
consent motion to extend their authorization to use cash collateral
through Oct. 19, 2018 and to continue to honor their adequate
protection obligations to their lenders.

The Debtors require the use of cash collateral to continue their
business operations and to pay their regular daily expenses,
including employees' wages, utilities, and other costs of doing
business.  The Debtors also require cash collateral to meet
postpetition payroll, to pay necessary business expenses, and to
continue their operations.

The Debtors have previously obtained the Court's approval for the
use of cash collateral on a bridge, interim, and final basis.  The
Cash Collateral Order provides for certain adequate protection
obligations to Debtors' current agent, BSP Agency, LLC, and certain
Lenders.

The Adequate Protection Obligations include, among other items,
post-petition interest payments, payment of the reasonable fees and
expenses incurred by the Agent, including fees and expenses of one
lead counsel, one local counsel, and one financial advisor for
Agent, and certain reporting requirements.  The Debtors claim that
they are current on all of said Adequate Protection Obligations.

Thus, the Debtors contend that the Agent and Lenders' interest in
Cash Collateral is and will be adequately protected through the
extended period of Cash Collateral usage.  The adequate protection
will be provided to Agent and Lenders through the continuation of
the Adequate Protection Obligations and other protections granted
in the Cash Collateral Order.

A full-text copy of the Debtors' Motion is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/moeb18-41671-104.pdf

                     About MGTF Radio Company

MGTF Radio Company, LLC, which conducts business under the name
Steel City Media, is a multimedia company offering print, radio,
and digital advertising solutions. Its stations include Country
KBEQ (Q104), Country KFKF, Top 40 KMXV (MIX 93.3), and AC KCKC (KC
102.1).  The company was founded in 1984 and is based in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, with a location in Kansas City,
Missouri.

MGTF Radio Company sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mo. Case Nos. 18-41671 and 18-41672)
on March 20, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Michael J. Frischling, vice-president,
MGTF Radio and WPNT estimated assets and liabilities of $50 million
to $100 million.

The Debtors hire Carmody MacDonald P.C. as their legal counsel; and
Smithwick & Belendiuk, P.C., as special counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 cases.


MICHAEL DAVIDSON: London Buying Huntsville Property for $250K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Wayne Davidson asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama to authorize the sale of the real
property located at 2616 Memorial Parkway NW, Huntsville, Alabama,
to Joseph London, III for $250,000.

The Property is more particularly described as all that part of the
Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 3 South, Range 1 West in
the City of Huntsville, Madison County, Alabama, particularly
described as beginning at a point on the West margin of Memorial
Parkway 200 feet R.O.W., said place beginning being located North 1
degree 26 minutes East 1284.73 feet from the Southwest corner of
said Section 24, said place of beginning is further described as
being located North 31 degrees 11 minutes East 974.0 feet from the
intersection of the North margin of Max Luther Drive with the East
margin of Memorial Parkway.

There is no debt that encumbers the Real Property.  The Debtor has
entered into an Agreement to Purchase Real Estate with the Buyer.
Pursuant to the Motion, the Debtor asks authority from the Court to
sell the Real Property to the Buyer, free and clear of all liens,
claims, interests, and encumbrances for the sum of $250,000.  

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Michael_Davidson_60_Sales.pdf

The Debtor valued the Property at $175,000 in Schedule A of his
bankruptcy Petition.  Thus, he considers the sales price to be fair
and reasonable.

The relief requested by the Debtor is in the best interests of the
estate and the estates' creditors.  Although the Real property is
currently leased, that lease ends in October, 2018.  Thus, the Real
Property will soon be vacant.

Moreover, the Debtor asks the further authority to transfer the
Real Property to a buyer without being subject to taxation under
any state or local law imposing a stamp, transfer or similar tax in
accordance with section 1146(c) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Furthermore, notwithstanding the possible applicability of Rules
6004 or 9014 or otherwise, the Debtor asks that the Order will be
immediately effective and enforceable upon entry and will not be
stayed pursuant to Rules 6004(h).

Any Party that desires to object to the Motion must do so in
writing at least 10 days prior to the hearing.

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Kevin D. Heard, Esq.
          HEARD, ARY, & DAURO, LLC
          307 Clinton Ave. W, Suite 310
          Huntsville, AL 35801
          Telephone: (256) 535-0817
          Facsimile: (256) 535-0818
          E-mail: kheard@heardlaw.com

Michael Wayne Davidson sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Ala. Case No. 18-82270) on July 31, 2018.  The Debtor tapped Kevin
D. Heard, Esq., at Heard, Ary & Dauro, LLC, as counsel.


MID-SOUTH BUSINESS: Allowed to Use Renasant Bank Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Jason D. Woodard of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Mississippi has signed his approval to an
Agreed Order authorizing North Mississippi Spine Center, Inc. to
use Renasant Bank's cash collateral.

The Parties understand and agree that even though they are
resolving the motion for an order prohibiting the use of cash
collateral, etc., as well as, the motion seeking relief from the
automatic stay, the provisions of the Agreed Order will not be
considered a waiver of any procedural and substantive rights that
may exist in favor of or against any party named in the adversary
proceeding styled, "Thomas L. Windham, Sr., M.D., Linda T. Windham,
R. Taylor Windham, North Mississippi Spine Center, Inc., Mid-South
Business Associates, LLC and TLW Properties, LLC vs. Renasant Bank,
Successor to Merchants & Farmers Bank," Adversary Proceeding No.
14-01038-JDW.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Agreed Order, the
Debtor agreed to protect Renasant's interest in the cash collateral
by, inter alia, making monthly adequate protection payments in the
amount of $3,500, maintaining a level of accounts receivable in the
total amount of $1,100,000 or greater, providing Renasant with a
monthly accounts receivable report and allowing Renasant to inspect
its accounts receivable records.

The Debtor has now ceased doing business and no new receivables are
being generated.

Renasant and the Debtor have agreed to the following terms and
conditions that will best preserve and collect the outstanding
accounts receivable:

     A. Taylor Windham will continue to collect the Debtor's
accounts receivable in consideration for the payment of
compensation, medical insurance benefits, and specific expenses
related to the collection activities, to wit:

            (a) Compensation for collection services at the rate of
$20 per hour applicable to 15 to 20 hours per week;

            (b) The payment from the collections of Taylor
Windham's medical insurance premium in the sum of approximately
$1,200 per month;

            (c) The payment from the collections of related
software expenses in the sum of $183 per month; and

            (d) The payment from the collections of quarterly fees
owed to the Office of the U.S. Trustee in the sum of $325 per
quarter, which is equivalent to $108.33 per month.

     B. Renasant is agreeable to allow a cushion of $1,900 per
month to be temporarily retained by the Debtor for the payment of
other collection expenses, including attorney fees that might be
attributable to services rendered for the Debtor. Since these
expenses are being paid from Renasant's Cash Collateral, Renasant
would reserve the right to object to any fees that appear to be
unreasonable. Consequently, Renasant will be paid all collections
in excess of $5,000 per month through February 28, 2019.

     C. During the term of the Agreed Order (from September 1, 2018
through February 28, 2019), Taylor Windham will provide a monthly
accounting of all account receivable collections to Renasant which
will be submitted with his remittance of the collection proceeds
exceeding $5,000 per month. Subject to the provisions, regulations,
and guidelines set forth in the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA), Renasant reserves the right to inspect
and analyze the accounts receivable at reasonable times in in order
to evaluate the efficacy of the collection efforts.

     D. At the conclusion of the collection term (February 28,
2019), Renasant will determine whether this arrangement should be
continued or whether an alternative collection procedure would be
more effective considering the quality and aging of the accounts
receivable. At this same time, there will be an accounting made as
to the unspent "cushion funds" recognizing that these funds still
represent the cash collateral of Renasant. If this proposal is
terminated, these "cushion funds" will be remitted to Renasant.

     E. To facilitate these provisions, the Motion for Relief from
Automatic Stay filed by Renasant will be held in abeyance until
after Feb. 28, 2019.

The agreement between Renasant and the Debtor will effectively
terminate the payment of adequate protection payments to Citizens
Bank & Trust Company, currently being made in the sum of $2,200 per
month.  Since Citizens Bank has acknowledged that it has no lien on
the Debtor's accounts receivable, it has not entered its appearance
in either of these proceedings, and it has advised Renasant's
counsel that it will not object to the entry of the Agreed Order
approving the settlement.

A full-text copy of the Agreed Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/msnb14-11547-378.pdf

                About North Mississippi Spine
                 Center, Inc. and Affiliates

North Mississippi Spine Center, Inc. and affiliates sought Chapter
11 Bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Miss. Case No. 14-11547) on
April 21, 2014.  In the petitions signed by Thomas L Windham, MD,
managing member, Mid-South Business Associates estimated $1 million
to $10 million in assets and debt, and North Mississippi Spine
Center estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in debt as of the bankruptcy filing.  The case is
assigned to Judge Jason D. Woodard.  The Debtor is represented by
Robert Gambrell, Esq. of Gambrell & Associates, PLLC.


MO'S HOUSE: Taps Russell Jeffcoat as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------
Mo's House of Pizza, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of South Carolina to hire an accountant.

The Debtor proposes to employ Russell Jeffcoat and pay him $395 per
month for his accounting services.  

Mr. Jeffcoat is "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

Mr. Jeffcoat maintains an office at:

     Russell Jeffcoat
     4597 Savannah Highway, North
     South Carolina 29112
     Phone: +1 803-247-5511

                   About Mo's House of Pizza

Mo's House of Pizza, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 18-03503) on July 10, 2018.
In the petition signed by Mohamed Said M. Abdel Aziz, member, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of
less than $500,000.  Judge David R. Duncan presides over the case.
The Debtor tapped Reid B. Smith, Esq., as its bankruptcy counsel.


MODERN VIDEOFILM: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Moved to Dec. 12
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mark S. Wallace of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California has extended Modern VideoFilm,
Inc.'s exclusive periods to file and to solicit acceptances to a
chapter 11 plan to Dec. 12, 2018 and March 12, 2019, respectively.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor sought exclusivity extension to give it sufficient time to
resolve some ownership issues.  The Debtor filed a plan and
disclosure statement on June 20, 2018, which provides for 100% of
the proceeds generated from the liquidation of all assets (which
consists of causes of action against third parties) to be paid to
creditors.  However, the Court disapproved the Debtor's disclosure
statement, without prejudice, ordering that the Debtor could not
file another disclosure statement until the dispute over the
Debtor's right to and interests in causes of action referenced in
the disclosure statement are resolved.  Consequently, the Debtor
filed a motion to resolve the ownership issues addressed in the
Court, which motion is scheduled to be heard in October.
Accordingly, pursuant to the Court's order, the Debtor is required
to defer its plan confirmation process.  

                    About Modern VideoFilm

Modern VideoFilm Inc. is a feature film and television
post-production company based in California.  Modern VideoFilm
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11792) on
May 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Howard Grobstein, chief
restructuring officer, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities.
Judge Mark S Wallace presides over the case.  Garrick A. Hollander,
Esq., at Winthrop Couchot Golubow Hollander, LLP, serves as the
Debtor's counsel.


MOHEGAN TRIBAL: Bank Debt Trades at 6% Off
------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Mohegan Tribal
Gaming is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 94.05
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 0.86 percentage points from
the previous week. Mohegan Tribal pays 400 basis points above LIBOR
to borrow under the $783 million facility. The bank loan matures on
October 14, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and Standard & Poor's
gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday,
September 28.


MONITRONICS INT'L: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off
---------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Monitronics
International Inc. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at
97.63 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September
28, 2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.96 percentage points from
the previous week. Monitronics International pays 550 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $1.10 billion facility. The bank
loan matures on September 30, 2022. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1'
and Standard & Poor's gave a 'CC' rating to the loan. The loan is
one of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, September 28.


MONSTER CONCRETE: Plan Adds Sister Company's Financial Condition
----------------------------------------------------------------
Monster Concrete, LLC submits a third amended disclosure statement
in connection with its third amended plan dated Oct. 5, 2018.

The third amended plan provides a summary of Monster Concrete and
Excavation, Inc.'s financial condition. Monster Concrete and
Excavation is the Debtor's sister company. At the time Monster
Concrete and Excavation filed its Petition it had assets of
approximately $121,198.81 and liabilities of $422,302.17.

Monster Concrete and Excavation has filed its Operating Reports
with the Court since it filed bankruptcy. As an ongoing
construction company, Monster Concrete and Excavation keeps its
financial books and records on an accrual basis. A review of the
Operating Reports clearly indicate that Monster Concrete and
Excavation is becoming more fiscally stable.

Since Monster Concrete and Excavation's books are kept on an
accrual basis they include receivables not yet received by it.
Monster Concrete and Excavation’s Aging Accounts Receivable
Report shows that Monster Concrete and Excavation has $597,494 in
accounts receivable which have not yet been collected. The company
believes, however, that these receivables are collectible as they
are either current or are due for 30 days or less.

Monster Concrete and Excavation's Statement of Cash Flow for the
period of April 2018 through July 2018 provides information about
Monster Concrete and Excavation's cash receipts resulting from its
business operations. The primary purpose of the statement of cash
flows is to provide information about cash receipts, cash payments,
and the net change in cash resulting from the operating activities
of Monster Concrete and Excavation during the period. The cash at
the end of the period must correspond to the current bank balance
as shown on the balance sheet for that period. Thus, from a cash
flow statement, an investor knows the cash in and out of the
company for the given period.

A Summary of the Statement of Cash Flows confirms that Monster
Concrete and Excavation's finances are stabilizing.

The Debtor opines that if the Court grants the Motion for
Substantive Consolidation, Monster Concrete and Excavation will be
able to pay its allowed claims as well as Debtor's allowed claims.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-80280-11-47.pdf

               About Monster Concrete

Based in Huntsville, Alabama, Monster Concrete and Excavation,
Inc., and Monster Concrete, LLC, are involved in the concrete
business and are owned by Steve Williams.

Monster Concrete and Excavation, Inc., and Monster Concrete, LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
N.D. Ala. Case No. 18-80279 and 18-80280) on Feb. 1, 2018.  Judge
Clifton R. Jessup, Jr., presides over the cases.  Heard, Ary &
Dauro, LLC, is the Debtors' legal counsel.

The Court has not appointed a trustee or examiner nor has any
official committee been established in the bankruptcy case.


MONTREAL MAINE: Court Denies Wheeling Bid for Stay Pending Appeal
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The appeals case captioned WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILWAY CO.,
Appellant, v. ROBERT J. KEACH, in his capacity as the Estate
Representative for MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY, LTD.,
Appellee, No. 1:18-cv-00262-JDL (D. Me.) concerns a secured claim
made in connection with the 2013 Lac-Megantic train derailment
tragedy. Appellant Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. moves to stay
the judgment of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine
dated June 22, 2018. To implement the stay, Wheeling also seeks an
injunction requiring Appellee Robert J. Keach, the
post-confirmation Estate Representative of Montreal Maine &
Atlantic Railway Ltd. to ensure that the Debtor's Estate contains
sufficient funds to pay Wheeling's claim if Wheeling prevails on
appeal. District Judge Jon D. Levy denies the motion for stay and
injunctive relief pending appeal.

In ruling on a motion for stay pending appeal, the Court must
consider: "(1) whether the applicant has made a strong showing of
success on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be
irreparably harmed absent injunctive relief; (3) whether issuance
of the stay will injure other parties (i.e. balance of the
hardships); and (4) where the public interest lies."

Wheeling argues that the Bankruptcy Court made two critical errors
that give it a reasonable likelihood of appellate success: first,
the court misinterpreted federal rail transportation law in
concluding that MMA, one of several rail carriers transporting the
crude oil, has no contractual, statutory, or regulatory claims
against the shipper of the crude oil; and second, the court relied
on improper lay and expert opinion testimony to find that even if
MMA had contractual, statutory, or regulatory claims, those claims
have no value. The Court concludes that Wheeling has failed to
demonstrate that it is likely that the Bankruptcy Court erred in
finding that any potential claims have no value.

The Bankruptcy Court gave two reasons for its conclusion that any
potential non-tort claims by MMA against the Shipper have no value:
first, Wheeling, as the party with the burden of proof, failed to
introduce evidence establishing the reasonable settlement value of
MMA's claims; and second, Wheeling did not rebut the Estate
Representative's testimony that the claims have no value. Although
Wheeling contends that the Bankruptcy Court erred in considering
the Estate Representative's testimony, which Wheeling asserts was
improper expert testimony, the Bankruptcy Court's first rationale
for determining that the claims have no value is not dependent on
that testimony.

It also appears that Wheeling will have difficulty succeeding on
its argument that the Bankruptcy Court erred by receiving and
considering the Estate Representative's testimony related to the
valuation issue. First, the Estate Representative testified that
the aggregate value of all claims for damages against the Shipper
was at least 2.5 billion dollars, yet all of those claims were
settled for only 110 million dollars, or 4.4% of the total
aggregate value, as part of the comprehensive settlement. Wheeling
presented no evidence about what effect this precipitous settlement
discount had on the value of MMA's claims. In addition, the Estate
Representative testified that the Shipper asserted substantial
counterclaims far in excess of MMA's claims, and that it was
undisputed that MMA was not free from negligence. This testimony
was not expert witness opinion testimony because it did not require
specialized or expert knowledge and is properly considered fact
testimony. See id. at 239-41. In addition, Wheeling offered no
evidence assessing how MMA's contributory negligence or the
Shipper's probable counterclaims affected the value of MMA's
potential claims.

Even if, as Wheeling argues, other portions of the Estate
Representative's testimony were improper opinion testimony, that
alone would not be reversible error because the non-opinion
testimony provided by the Estate Representative supported the
Bankruptcy Court's conclusion that Wheeling had failed to
demonstrate the value of the proceeds of the claims.

The last three factors--irreparable harm, balance of the hardships,
and the public interest--either weigh against the issuance of a
stay and an injunction, or are neutral. Wheeling has not
established that it will suffer irreparable harm absent relief. The
balance of the hardships is a neutral factor because although
Wheeling may be required to undertake burdensome steps to recover
its collateral value if the money in the Set-Aside Fund is beyond
its reach, the same would likely be required of the Estate
Representative if he were required to attempt to claw back the
released funds from the Canadian bankruptcy Monitor and claimants
in that foreign proceeding. Finally, the public interest weighs
against injunctive relief and weighs in favor of the timely payment
of claims to the victims of the Lac-Megantic train derailment that
occurred over five years ago.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Oct. 1, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2OX8klO from Leagle.com.

WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, represented by
DANIEL L. ROSENTHAL, MARCUS CLEGG, GEORGE J. MARCUS, MARCUS CLEGG &
THOMAS J. LITWILER, FLETCHER & SIPPEL, LLC, pro hac vice.

ROBERT J KEACH, in his Capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of Maine
Montreal and Atlantic Railway, Ltd., Appellee, represented by ADAM
R. PRESCOTT, BERNSTEIN SHUR SAWYER & NELSON.

ROBERT J KEACH, in his Capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of Maine
Montreal and Atlantic Railway, Ltd., Appellee, pro se.

MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD, Debtor, represented by
NATHANIEL R. HULL -- nhull@verrilldana.com -- VERRILL DANA LLP.

                    About Montreal Maine

Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd., operated the train that
derailed and exploded in July 2013, killing 47 people and
destroying part of Lac-Megantic, Quebec.

The Company sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Maine Case
No.13-10670) on Aug. 7, 2013, with the aim of selling its business.
Its Canadian counterpart, Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Canada Co.,
meanwhile, filed for protection from creditors in Superior Court of
Quebec in Montreal.

Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Canada Co. ("MMA Canada"), the Canadian
unit of Chapter 11 debtor Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd.
("MMA"), on July 20, 2015, filed a Chapter 15 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Maine Case No. 15-20518) in Portland, Maine, to seek
recognition and enforcement in the U.S. of the order by the Quebec
Court approving MMA Canada's plan to pay off victims of the July
2013 derailment.

The law firm of Verrill Dana serves as counsel to the Debtor.

Robert J. Keach, Esq., at Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer, and Nelson,
P.A., is the Chapter 11 trustee.  Lindsay K. Zahradka and and D.
Sam Anderson, Esq. serves as his counsel. Development Specialists,
Inc., serves as his financial advisor; and Gordian Group, LLC,
serves as his investment banker.

Justice Martin Castonguay oversees the case in Canada.  Andrew
Adessky at Richter Consulting was named CCAA monitor.  The CCAA
Monitor is represented by Sylvain Vauclair at Woods LLP.  MM&A
Canada is represented by Patrice Benoit, Esq., at Gowling LaFleur
Henderson LLP.

The U.S. Trustee appointed a four-member official committee of
derailment victims. The Official Committee is represented by
Richard P. Olson, Esq., at Perkins Olson; and Luc A. Despins, Esq.,
at Paul Hastings LLP.

The unofficial committee of wrongful death claimants is Represented
by George W. Kurr, Jr., Esq., at Gross, Minsky & Mogul, P.A.;
Daniel C. Cohn, Esq., at Murtha Cullina LLP; Peter J. Flowers,
Esq., at Meyers & Flowers, LLC; Jason C. Webster, Esq., at The
Webster Law Firm; and Mitchell A. Toups, Esq., at Weller, Green
Toups & Terrell LLP.

The Debtor's Revised First Amended Plan of Liquidation, which
created a C$446 million settlement fund for the benefit of all
victims of the train derailment in 2013 that killed 47 people,
became effective Dec. 22, 2015.


MONTREAL MAINE: Estate Rep. Bid to Dismiss Wheeling Appeal Junked
-----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Jon D. Levy denied Robert Keach's motion to dismiss
as moot the appeals case captioned WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILWAY
CO., Appellant, v. ROBERT J. KEACH, in his capacity as the Estate
Representative for MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY, LTD.,
Appellee, No. 1:18-cv-00262-JDL (D. Me.).

Keach, the Estate Representative of the estate of Montreal Maine &
Atlantic Railway, Ltd. moved to dismiss as moot Wheeling & Lake
Erie Railway Co.'s appeal from a judgment of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maine, which denied Wheeling's secured
claim against the estate arising from certain settlement proceeds
connected to the 2013 Lac-Megantic train derailment tragedy. The
Estate Representative argues that Wheeling's appeal should be
dismissed as moot because the parties agreed that a five million
dollar set-aside fund would be the exclusive source of potential
recovery by Wheeling; the funds were subsequently disbursed by the
Estate Representative upon the issuance of the Bankruptcy Order;
and there is therefore no effective judicial remedy that could
provide actual relief to Wheeling.

The Estate Representative argues that Wheeling's appeal of the
Bankruptcy Order is moot because Paragraph 84 of the Confirmation
Plan established the Set-Aside Fund as the exclusive source of
Wheeling's potential recovery, and that because the money has been
released to the Canadian Monitor it is entirely within the
jurisdiction of Canadian courts.

The Court holds that nothing in the plain language of Paragraph 84
establishes that the Set-Aside Fund is the exclusive source of
funds from which Wheeling can recover if successful on its claim.
Part (b) of Paragraph 84 establishes the Set-Aside Fund, but
contains no indication that the fund is the exclusive source from
which Wheeling's claim, if successful, must be satisfied.
Therefore, Paragraph 84 does not itself render Wheeling's appeal
moot.

The Estate Representative argued at the September 7 motion hearing
that Wheeling's failure to diligently seek a stay pending appeal
also renders this appeal equitably moot. Wheeling did, however,
seek a stay from the Bankruptcy Court. In addition, there is no
evidence before the Court that the money from the Set-Aside Fund
has been disbursed by the Canadian Monitor or that it is otherwise
impracticable or impossible for the Estate Representative to
recover the money.

A copy of the Court's Order dated Oct. 1, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2pRJ1Dp from Leagle.com.

WHEELING & LAKE ERIE RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, represented by
DANIEL L. ROSENTHAL, MARCUS CLEGG, GEORGE J. MARCUS, MARCUS CLEGG &
THOMAS J. LITWILER, FLETCHER & SIPPEL, LLC, pro hac vice.

ROBERT J KEACH, in his Capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of Maine
Montreal and Atlantic Railway, Ltd., Appellee, represented by ADAM
R. PRESCOTT, BERNSTEIN SHUR SAWYER & NELSON.

ROBERT J. KEACH, in his Capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of Maine
Montreal and Atlantic Railway, Ltd., Appellee, pro se.

MONTREAL MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD, Debtor, represented by
NATHANIEL R. HULL , VERRILL DANA LLP.

                    About Montreal Maine

Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd., operated the train that
derailed and exploded in July 2013, killing 47 people and
destroying part of Lac-Megantic, Quebec.

The Company sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Maine Case No.
13-10670) on Aug. 7, 2013, with the aim of selling its business.
Its Canadian counterpart, Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Canada Co.,
meanwhile, filed for protection from creditors in Superior Court of
Quebec in Montreal.

Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Canada Co. ("MMA Canada"), the Canadian
unit of Chapter 11 debtor Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd.
("MMA"), on July 20, 2015, filed a Chapter 15 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Maine Case No. 15-20518) in Portland, Maine, to seek
recognition and enforcement in the U.S. of the order by the Quebec
Court approving MMA Canada's plan to pay off victims of the July
2013 derailment.

The law firm of Verrill Dana serves as counsel to the Debtor.

Robert J. Keach, Esq., at Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer, and Nelson,
P.A., is the Chapter 11 trustee.  Lindsay K. Zahradka and and D.
Sam Anderson, Esq. serves as his counsel. Development Specialists,
Inc., serves as his financial advisor; and Gordian Group, LLC,
serves as his investment banker.

Justice Martin Castonguay oversees the case in Canada.  Andrew
Adessky at Richter Consulting was named CCAA monitor.  The CCAA
Monitor is represented by Sylvain Vauclair at Woods LLP.  MM&A
Canada is represented by Patrice Benoit, Esq., at Gowling LaFleur
Henderson LLP.

The U.S. Trustee appointed a four-member official committee of
derailment victims. The Official Committee is represented by
Richard P. Olson, Esq., at Perkins Olson; and Luc A. Despins, Esq.,
at Paul Hastings LLP.

The unofficial committee of wrongful death claimants is Represented
by George W. Kurr, Jr., Esq., at Gross, Minsky & Mogul, P.A.;
Daniel C. Cohn, Esq., at Murtha Cullina LLP; Peter J. Flowers,
Esq., at Meyers & Flowers, LLC; Jason C. Webster, Esq., at The
Webster Law Firm; and Mitchell A. Toups, Esq., at Weller, Green
Toups & Terrell LLP.

The Debtor's Revised First Amended Plan of Liquidation, which
created a C$446 million settlement fund for the benefit of all
victims of the train derailment in 2013 that killed 47 people,
became effective Dec. 22, 2015.


MOORE CHROME: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Moore Chrome Products Company
           dba Moore Metal Finishing, Inc.
        3525 Silica Rd
        Sylvania, OH 43560-9814

Business Description: Moore Chrome Products Company is a privately
                      held company engaged in the business of
plating of  
                      metals or formed products.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 11, 2018

Case No.: 18-33177

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Ohio (Toledo)

Judge: Hon. John P. Gustafson

Debtor's Counsel: Eric R. Neuman, Esq.
                  DILLER AND RICE, LLC
                  124 East Main Street
                  Van Wert, OH 45891
                  Tel: 419-724-9047
                       419-244-8500
                  E-mail: eric@drlawllc.com
                          steven@drlawllc.com
                          kim@drlawllc.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Scott W. Backus, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohnb18-33177.pdf


MR. STEVEN: Taps Adams and Reese as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Mr. Steven, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Louisiana to hire Adams and Reese LLP as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan;
and provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Adams and Reese will charge these hourly rates:

     Robin Cheatham                   $550
     Lisa Hedrick                     $485
     Scott Cheatham                   $450
     Robert Parrott                   $315
     Angela Grewal                    $305
     Paralegals/Law Clerks     $110 - $210

The firm received a retainer in the sum of $30,000 from the Debtor
for its post-petition services.

Scott Cheatham, Esq., a partner at Adams and Reese, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robin B. Cheatham, Esq.
     Adams and Reese LLP
     701 Poydras Street, Suite 4500
     New Orleans, LA 70139
     Tel: (504) 581-3234
     Facsimile: (504) 566-0210
     Email: cheathamrb@arlaw.com
     Email: robin.cheatham@arlaw.com

                     About Mr. Steven LLC

Mr. Steven, LLC, is a privately-held company in New Iberia,
Louisiana, engaged in offshore marine vessel leasing.

Mr. Steven sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 18-51277) on Oct. 3, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Mr. Steven J. Miguez, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $5,152,864 in assets and $23,651,405 in liabilities.  

Judge John W. Kolwe presides over the case.


MULTIFLORA GREENHOUSES: Court Official Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. bankruptcy administrator on Oct. 10 disclosed in a filing
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North
Carolina that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Multiflora Greenhouses, Inc.

                   About Multiflora Greenhouses
                          and Austram LLC

Multiflora Greenhouses, Inc. --
http://www.multifloragreenhouses.com/-- is a greenhouse grower and
wholesaler based in Hillsborough, North Carolina.  It grows and
distributes hundreds of plant varieties as well as offers other
products and services.  Austram, LLC, manufactures clay products
and refractories.

Multiflora and Austram sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case Nos. 18-80691 and 18-80693)
on Sept. 24, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Richard Mason, president, Multiflora
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Austram disclosed less than $50,000 in
both assets and liabilities.

Judge Benjamin A. Kahn presides over the cases.  The Debtor tapped
Parry Tyndall White as its legal counsel.


MURPHY OIL: Fitch Raises LT Issuer Default Rating to 'BB+'
----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Murphy Oil Corporation's (NYSE: MUR)
Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) and unsecured debt ratings to
'BB+'/'RR4' from 'BB'/'RR4'. The senior unsecured revolver was
affirmed at 'BBB-'/'RR1'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.
Approximately $2.8 billion in debt is affected by the rating
action.

The upgrade reflects the significant improvement of Murphy's credit
metrics since the last review, the debt-accretive impact of the
announced Petrobras Americas Inc. (PAI) transaction as well as the
company's increased production profile. Under Fitch's base case
assumptions, the agency expects the proposed transaction will
result in Murphy generating positive free cash flow. These factors
are somewhat offset by the company's history of investing in
long-term exploration projects at the expense of developing core
basins and MUR's sizable dividend. This transaction, however, helps
mitigates Fitch's capital allocation concerns.

Murphy has announced that it is entering into a joint venture with
PAI in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM). Murphy and PAI will contribute
their existing GOM assets (MUR current production of net ~19 mboe/d
and PAI current production of net ~36 mboe/d) to a newly formed JV
in which Murphy will own 80% and PAI will own 20%. Murphy will pay
PAI ~$900 million in cash, which will likely be adjusted down to
$775 million to $800 million for closing adjustments and will be
funded by $500 million from cash on hand and $300 million to $375
million from the revolver. Fitch believes the joint venture will be
cash flow accretive by 2019 and add an incremental $320 million of
EBITDAX to Murphy. The transaction is expected to close by 4Q'18.

MUR is planning to use half of the incremental free cash flow to
fund the development of its Eagle Ford assets. The remaining half
will be used to repay debt incurred from the transaction.
In addition, MUR has successfully amended its existing $1.1 billion
four-year senior unsecured revolving credit facility to allow for
the new JV. As part of the amendments, the springing collateral
test has been removed

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Debt-Accretive JV Transaction: The proposed JV transaction is debt
accretive given the low amount of incremental debt relative to
incremental EBITDA (~1x) and the expectation that half of the
incremental free cash flow will go to reduce debt. Fitch expects
Murphy to be free cash flow positive following the transaction. In
addition, MUR intends to use the remaining incremental free cash
flow from the transaction to develop its Eagle Ford assets, which
should strengthen the company's production profile.

Diverse Operations: Murphy has an oil-weighted production profile
with principal positions in Eagle Ford, Montney, Duvernay and
offshore assets in Malaysia, the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, and Canada.
In addition, Murphy has a portfolio of exploratory assets in
offshore Mexico, Vietnam, Guam, Australia, and Brazil. Murphy is
managing its exploratory budget so it is not more than 10% of its
capital expenditure budget, although historically it has been
closer to 7% to 8%. Fitch is focused on the company's allocation of
capital to long-term exploration projects at the expense of
developing core basins, such as the Eagle Ford. Currently, Fitch
believes the pace and cost of Murphy's exploratory program is
manageable.

Eagle Ford Development: Management has proposed using a portion of
the incremental cash flow to develop its Eagle Ford assets.
Production from the Eagle Ford has declined to 44mboed from
61mboe/d in 2015, partly due to the allocation of capital to other
assets. Following the proposed transaction, MUR would increase the
number of wells its plans to drill from 45 in 2018 to 60-70 in 2019
and 2020 (approximately two rigs) and 90-100 wells in 2021
(approximately three rigs). MUR has approximately 1,900 wells in
the Eagle Ford that it considers economic. Fitch views the
increased development of this core asset and the potential
incremental production as a credit positive.

Improved FCF, Credit Metrics: Fitch estimates debt/EBITDA at Murphy
will decline to 2.1x in 2018 from 3.6x in 2016. The transaction
along with organic production growth should further reduce the
metric to below 2.0x in 2019. Fitch's base case, considering a
$65/barrel oil and $2.75/mcf natural gas price, forecasts Murphy
will be approximately $50 million to $100 million FCF positive in
2018 after approximately $175 million of common dividends. The
proposed JV transaction should help generate approximately $250
million to $300 million of FCF in 2019 while dropping debt/flowing
barrel from approximately $18,000 in 2018 to approximately $14,000
in 2019.

Amended Credit Facility: MUR has received consents from lenders
under its credit facility for amendments that would allow for the
joint venture transaction and would remove the springing collateral
requirement. The amendment also removes the minimum domestic
liquidity requirement, which will allow for more efficient movement
of funds among foreign and domestic subsidiaries.

Manageable Maturities Profile: The undrawn revolver matures in 2021
and the next bond maturity is not until 2022 when two bonds come
due for a combined $1.1 billion.

Adequate Hedge Position: As of June 30, 2018, the company has
hedged approximately half of its U.S. onshore oil production for
2018 and approximately 25% of its Western Canadian natural gas
production.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Murphy is a mid-sized independent E&P with a diverse, global
resource base in various stages of exploration, development and
growth. Current production is approximately 171 mboepd as of June
30, 2018. Pro forma for the acquisition, production should average
over 200 mboepd. This will put MUR above QEP Resources Inc.
(BB/Watch Negative) and Newfield Exploration Co. (BBB-/Stable), but
still below Concho Resources (BBB/Stable), Continental Resources
(BBB-/Stable), and Hess Corporation (BBB-/Negative). MUR's netback
at $24.2 is above QEP, NFX, Noble Energy Inc. (BBB-/Positive), and
Hess, but below Continental and Concho. Pro forma proved 1P
reserves of ~763 mmboe are more in line with high 'BB' credits such
as QEP. MUR's debt/EBITDA is 2.2x although Fitch projects that the
acquisition will move the ratio to below 2.0x, which is more in
line with 'BBB-' issuers, such as Newfield, Hess, and Continental.
Although MUR currently generates a free cash flow deficit, the
acquisition should allow MUR to generate positive free cash flow in
2019, which is more in line with its peers. MUR has a smaller
onshore footprint relative to its peers, including QEP, Newfield,
Noble Energy, and Continental, while its diverse exploration and
development programs could limit capital allocation efficiency.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - WTI oil price of $65 in 2018, $60 in 2019, and long-term price
of $55;

  - Henry Hub gas price of $2.75 in 2018 and long-term price of
$3;

  - Production of 170mmboe/d in 2018 and 211 mboe/d in 2019 with
the increase due to the acquisition;

  - Liquids mix of 67% in 2018 and 2019;

  - Capex of $1.18 billion in 2018 and $1.34 billion in 2019;

  - Dividend payments remain unchanged;

  - Other than the JV transaction, no other acquisitions,
investments, or dispositions over the forecast period.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - Increased operational focus on core basins (Eagle Ford, GOM,
Malaysia) in terms of growing production and reserves, particularly
the core basins.

  - Clear and conservative capital allocation and financial policy
that demonstrates capital spending, shareholder return, and M&A
discipline;

  - Adhering to management's stated policy of no more than 10% of
the capital budget in exploratory projects;

  - Maintaining production of 175-200mboepd;

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Mid-cycle debt greater than 2.5x or higher;

  - Change in financial policy that results in capital allocated
away from core assets;

  - Mid-cycle debt/flowing barrel above $20,000/boe or debt/proved
developed reserves of over $6.00/boe on a sustained basis.

LIQUIDITY

Ample Liquidity. Murphy plans to fund the proposed JV with $475
million in cash and drawing $300 million under its $1.1 billion
revolving credit facility. Of the $901 million of cash on hand as
of June 30, 2018, approximately $698 million was held in Canada and
$108.6 million was in Malaysia.
The existing credit facility matures in August 2021. The next
significant debt maturity is in 2022, when two notes with a
combined $1.1 billion outstanding come due.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Murphy Oil Corporation

  - Long-term IDR upgraded to 'BB+' from 'BB';

  - Unsecured credit facility affirmed at 'BBB-'/'RR1';

  - Senior Unsecured Notes upgraded to 'BB+'/'RR4' from
'BB'/'RR4'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


NATOMA STATION: Taps W. Steven Shumway as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Natoma Station Learning Center, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California to hire the
Law Office of W. Steven Shumway as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding the administration of its
bankruptcy estate; assist in the collection of outstanding accounts
receivable, deposits or causes of action; represent the Debtor in
suits filed in California state courts and those related to its
Chapter 11 case; and provide other legal services.

W. Steven Shumway, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the
case, charges an hourly fee of $325.  Paralegals charge $70 per
hour.

The Debtor paid the firm $1,717 for the filing fee.

The firm neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its estate, according to court filings.

Shumway can be reached through:

     W. Steven Shumway, Esq.
     Law Office of W. Steven Shumway
     3400 Douglas Blvd., Suite 250
     Roseville, CA 95661
     Phone: (916) 789-8821
     Fax: (916) 789-2083
     Email: sshumway@shumwaylaw.com

             About Natoma Station Learning Center

Natoma Station Learning Center, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No.
18-25538) on Aug. 31, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$1 million.  Judge Christopher M. Klein presides over the case.


NATURE'S BOUNTY: Bank Debt Trades at 4% Off
-------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Nature's Bounty is
a borrower traded in the secondary market at 96.47
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.45 percentage points from
the previous week. Nature's Bounty pays 350 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $1.5 billion facility. The bank loan
matures on September 30, 2024. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, September 28.


NEOVASC INC: Reducer Granted FDA Breakthrough Device Designation
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted Breakthrough
Device designation to the Neovasc Reducer, a medical device for the
treatment of refractory angina, which is not currently approved for
commercial sale in the U.S.

The FDA grants Breakthrough Device designation in order to expedite
the development and review of a device that demonstrates compelling
potential to provide a more effective treatment or diagnosis for
life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases.  To qualify
as a Breakthrough Device, there must either be no FDA approved
treatments presently available, or the technology must offer
significant advantages over existing approved alternatives.

"We are pleased that the FDA has approved our request for
Breakthrough Device designation for the Reducer.  We will now start
a process of further discussions and filings with the FDA, to
obtain further guidance as to the regulatory pathway for entrance
into the U.S. market.  This designation supports our belief that
this technology offers a significant benefit to patients suffering
from refractory angina," commented Fred Colen, Neovasc's president
and chief executive officer.  "We look forward to working closely
with FDA through this regulatory process."

Refractory angina, resulting in continued symptoms despite maximal
available medical therapy and without revascularization options, is
estimated to affect 600,000 to 1.8 million Americans, with 50,000
to 100,000 new cases per year.

                     About Neovasc Inc.

Based in Richmond, British Columbia, Neovasc Inc. --
http://www.neovasc.com/-- is a specialty medical device company
that develops, manufactures and markets products for the rapidly
growing cardiovascular marketplace.  Its products include the
Neovasc Reducer, for the treatment of refractory angina, which is
not currently available in the United States and has been available
in Europe since 2015, and the Tiara, for the transcatheter
treatment of mitral valve disease, which is currently under
clinical investigation in the United States, Canada and Europe.

Neovasc reported a net loss of US$22.91 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of US$86.49 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Neovasc had
US$23.88 million in total assets, US$28.04 million in total
liabilities and a total deficit of US$4.15 million.

Grant Thornton issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017, stating that the Company incurred a consolidated net loss of
US$24.86 million during the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and, as of
that date, the Company's consolidated current liabilities exceeded
its current assets by US$6.06 million.  The auditors said these
conditions, along with other matters, indicate the existence of a
material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


NEWARK SPECIAL: Bank Seeks Approval of Cash Collateral Stipulation
------------------------------------------------------------------
Secured creditor State Bank of India (California) requests the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of
California to approve its Stipulation with the debtor Newark
Special Technology Inc., erroneously identified on its bankruptcy
petition as Newark Special Technologies Inc., regarding interim use
of cash collateral.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owed State Bank of India not
less than $141,064 under the Loan. To secure repayment of the Loan,
the Debtor granted the Bank a security interest in, among other
property, its present and future inventory, accounts, fixtures,
equipment and general intangibles and all proceeds and products
thereof.

The Stipulation authorizes the Debtor to use cash collateral solely
for the purpose of paying, and in amounts not to exceed by more
than 10%, the expenses listed in the budget from August 2, 2018
(Petition Date) through the earlier of November 30, 2018 or the
date the Debtor's authorization to use cash collateral terminates
in accordance with the Stipulation. The Budget provides total
projected monthly expenses of approximately $39,548.

The Stipulation provides for automatic termination of the Debtor's
authorization to use cash collateral upon the Bankruptcy Court's
entry of an order (1) converting this bankruptcy case to a case
under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code; (2) appointing a chapter 11
trustee in this bankruptcy case; or (3) granting relief from the
automatic stay to State Bank of India or any other creditor with a
security interest in the collateral.

The Stipulation requires the Debtor to make $2,800 monthly payments
to State Bank of India, for each month during which the Debtor is
authorized to use cash collateral pursuant to the Stipulation. This
is the current monthly payment owed to State Bank of India under
the terms of the Forbearance and Modification Agreement entered
into by and between State Bank of India, the Debtor and certain
other parties. All payments will be applied to reduced, dollar for
dollar, State Bank of India's allowed secured claim.

The Stipulation grants State Bank of India a replacement lien on
all assets to which State Bank of India's prepetition lien would
have attached but for the filing of the Debtor's bankruptcy
petition, with the replacement lien to have the same validity,
priority and extent as the Bank's prepetition lien on the Debtor's
assets.

The Stipulation further requires the Debtor to: (a) permit State
Bank of India and its agents to access and inspect the collateral;
(b) keep the collateral insured as required under the Loan
Documents and the U.S. Trustee guidelines; and (c) comply with all
financial reporting requirements under the pre-petition loan
documents.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-18929-32.pdf

                About Newark Special Technologies

Established in 1958, Newark Special Technologies, Inc., doing
business as Magorien Honing and Hydraulics, is in the business of
high precision I.D. contract honing.  The Company has also
incorporated an in-house division for deep hole gun drilling,
trepanning and boring.  The Company has recently merged with Modern
Hydraulic Technology to offer efficient and economical solutions
for building new hydraulic presses, modifying and repairing
presses, and complete overhauling of presses and cylinders.

Newark Special Technologies sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-18929) on Aug. 2,
2018.  In the petition signed by Batuk Viradia, president, the
Debtor disclosed $125,800 in total assets and $1,023,154 in total
liabilities.  Judge Neil W. Bason presides over the case.  Joseph
L. Pittera, Esq., at the Law Offices of Joseph L. Pittera, is the
Debtor's counsel.


NEXSTAR BROADCASTING: S&P Rates New $2.676BB Secured Debt 'BB+'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level rating and '1'
recovery rating to Irving, Texas-based television broadcaster
Nexstar Broadcasting Inc.'s proposed $2.676 billion senior secured
credit facility, which consists of a $166 million revolving credit
facility due 2023, a $853 million term loan A due 2023, and a
$1.657 billion term loan B due 2024. The '1' recovery rating
indicates S&P's expectation for very high recovery (90%-100%;
rounded estimate: 95%) of principal in the event of a payment
default. The company will use all proceeds to repay a portion of
existing senior secured debt.

The transaction modestly improves Nexstar's financial flexibility
and cash flow. The term loan A and revolver maturity will be
extended by 15 months and interest expense will be reduced by about
$7 million per year.

S&P said, "We expect Nexstar's adjusted debt to average
trailing-eight-quarter EBITDA to decline to the low- to mid-4x area
by the end of 2018, unchanged by the transaction. We could raise
our rating on Nexstar if we expect the company will adopt a more
conservative financial policy and commits to consistently
maintaining leverage below 4.5x. We view this as somewhat unlikely
given our expectation for consolidation within the television
broadcasting industry to continue in 2019, and that Nexstar will
continue to be acquisitive. Given the importance of scale in the
industry, competition for television stations is high and
acquisition prices could well exceed 8x EBITDA."

  RATINGS LIST

  Nexstar Broadcasting Inc.
   Issuer Credit Rating                   BB-/Stable/--

  New Rating

  Nexstar Broadcasting Inc.  $166 mil. revolver due 2023
   Senior Secured                         BB+
    Recovery Rating                       1 (95%)
   $853 mil. term loan A due 2023
   Senior Secured                         BB+
    Recovery Rating                       1 (95%)
   $1.657 bil. term loan B due 2024
   Senior Secured                         BB+
    Recovery Rating                       1 (95%)



NMN HOLDINGS III: S&P Assigns 'B' Issuer Credit Rating
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issuer credit rating to CRT
mobility solutions provider NMN Holdings III Corp. (Numotion). The
outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P assigned its 'B' issue-level rating to the
company's proposed first-lien senior secured debt, which comprises
a $50 million revolver, $330 million first-lien term loan, and $70
million delayed-draw first-lien term loan. The recovery rating is
'3', indicating expectations of meaningful recovery (50%-70%;
rounded estimate: 65%) in a payment default. The second-lien debt
will not be rated.

The ratings on Numotion reflect its limited size and narrow
business focus in the relatively small and highly fragmented CRT
market, meaningful revenue concentration with a single supplier,
high leverage, thin free cash flow, and third-party reimbursement
exposure. These risks are partially mitigated by the company's
leading market position, meaningful competitive advantage provided
by its large team of skilled assistive technology professionals
(ATPs), and relatively predictable stream of recurring revenues
coming from chair replacements and repairs.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our forecast of double-digit
percentage revenue growth in 2018 and 2019, modest EBITDA margin
expansion, steady reported FOCF of at least $10 million, and debt
leverage greater than 5x under financial sponsor ownership.

"We could lower our rating if the company's operating performance
deteriorates from our base-case forecast, resulting in thin or
negligible free cash flow generation. Such a scenario could
encompass greater than expected pricing pressures from its
wheelchair suppliers, a cut to reimbursement from government payers
or billing-related complications resulting in 200 basis points
EBITDA margin contraction and leading to free cash flow declining
below $10 million.

"We would consider raising the rating if Numotion decreases
leverage to below 5x and we believe it would remain there on a
sustained basis. We believe this scenario is highly unlikely
considering the company's financial sponsor ownership."


NOON MEDITERRANEAN: Daphne's Buying All Assets for $731K
--------------------------------------------------------
Noon Mediterranean, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Delaware to authorize the sale of substantially all
assets to Daphne's, Inc. or its nominee for (i) $731,265 cash to
pay creditors, expenses, fees and legal expenses; (ii) 2% of equity
given to creditors in Daphne's; (ii) up to $100,000 in
post-bankruptcy costs; and (iv) payment of October rent for all
assumed locations, subject to higher and better offers.

Shortly after its bankruptcy filing, the Debtor applied for
authorization to employ Griffin Financial Group, LLC to serve as
its investment banker.  Griffin thoroughly canvassed the market for
a transaction that would maximize the value of the Debtor's estate
and marketed the Debtor's assets for sale.  The Debtor's marketing
efforts, assisted by Griffin, resulted in execution of the Term
Sheet.

Per the Term Sheet, the material terms of the proposed sale are:

     Purchaser: Daphne's, Inc, a Delaware Company

     Premises: 12 Noon locations

     Assets: Leases for all 12 locations to be assigned.  All
restaurant furniture, fixtures and equipment and inventory and
restaurant supplies remaining on the Premises on the Possession
Date (all to be detailed in a formal inventory) to be initialed by
the parties; FF&E and Physical Inventory sold and delivered "as
is."  All intellectual property to include but not limited to
domain names, trademarks, recipes, artwork, website, and any other
IP belonging or affiliated with Noon Med .

     Consideration: (i) $731,265 cash to pay creditors, expenses,
fees and legal expenses; (ii) 2% of equity given to creditors in
Daphne's; (ii) up to $100,000 in post-bankruptcy costs; and (iv)
payment of October rent for all assumed locations.

The Debtor intends to file a copy of the proposed purchase
agreement as soon as practicable, but no later than two business
days prior to the hearing on the Motion.  The proposed sale does
not involve credit bidding.

Through the Motion, the Debtor respectfully asks approval of the
sale of the Purchased Assets to the Buyer free and clear of all
liens, claims, interests and encumbrances pursuant to the
Agreement.  It has determined, in its business judgment, that the
sale and assignment proposed is the most efficient and
cost-effective way to liquidate the Purchased Assets, is fair and
reasonable, and is in the best interests of its estate.

In addition, the Debtor is also asking approval of the Assumption
Procedures to facilitate the fair and orderly assumption and
assignment of its executory contracts and unexpired leases in
conjunction with any sale.  As soon as reasonably practicable (but
no later than the date the Agreement is filed with the Court), the
Debtor proposes to file with the Court a schedule setting forth the
contracts and/or leases proposed to be assumed and assigned,
together with any cure amount(s) applicable to such contract, and
serve the Assumption and Assignment/Cure Notice on each Contract
Counterparty under each proposed Assumed and Assigned Contract.
The objection must be actually received no later than the date/time
of the hearing for approval of the sale.

Finally, the Debtor asks that the Court waives the 14-day stay
provided by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h).

A copy of the Term Sheet attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Noon_Mediterranean_77_Sales.pdf

                   About Noon Mediterranean

Established in 2011, Noon Mediterranean, Inc., owns and operates
restaurants in Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, Texas; and
New York City.  The company is headquartered in New York.

Noon Mediterranean sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 18-11814) on Aug. 6, 2018.
In the petition signed by Stefan Boyd, president and CEO, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.  Judge Brendan Linehan
Shannon presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped Ciardi Ciardi &
Astin as its legal counsel.


NORTHERN OIL: Crestview Partners Has 13.4% Stake as of Oct. 1
-------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Crestview Partners III GP, L.P., Crestview W2 Holdings,
L.P., and W Energy Partners LLC disclosed that as of Oct. 1, 2018,
they beneficially owned 51,476,961 shares of common stock, par
value $0.001 per share, of Northern Oil & Gas, Inc., which
represents 13.38 percent of the shares outstanding.

W Energy Partners LLC is the parent of WR Operating LLC which
initially acquired those shares of Common Stock and shortly
thereafter distributed those shares of Common Stock to W Energy
Partners LLC.

Crestview Partners III GP, L.P. controls, indirectly through its
affiliates, the general partner of Crestview W2 Holdings, L.P.,
which is a member of W Energy Partners LLC.

Each of Crestview Partners III GP, L.P. and Crestview W2 Holdings,
L.P. may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of the 51,476,961
shares of Common Stock directly owned by W Energy Partners LLC.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                   https://is.gd/xDCxBt

                    About Northern Oil

Minnetonka, Minnesota-based Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. --
http://www.NorthernOil.com/-- is an independent energy company
engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and production
of oil and natural gas properties, primarily in the Bakken and
Three Forks formations within the Williston Basin in North Dakota
and Montana.  

Northern Oil reported a net loss of $9.19 million in 2017, a net
loss of $293.5 million in 2016, and a net loss of $975.4 million in
2015.  As of June 30, 2018, Northern Oil had $883.08 million in
total assets, $1.03 billion in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $147.8 million.


NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS: Hikes CFO's Annual Salary to $370,000
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals (i) approved an
increase of Mr. John J. McGovern's base salary to $370,000 per
annum, effective Oct. 1, 2018, and (ii) granted Mr. McGovern
250,000 non-qualified stock options under the Company's 2017
Omnibus Incentive Plan, effective Oct. 9, 2018, both in
consideration of his additional new positions as the interim
president and chief executive officer of the Company.  The exercise
price of the stock options are $1.45 per share, the closing price
of the Company's common stock on the NYSE American on the grant
date.  Those stock options will vest quarterly over four years
beginning on the grant date.

Effective Sept. 28, 2018, Mark M. Sieczkarek's positions as the
president and chief executive officer of the Company terminated
upon the appointment of Mr. McGovern, the Company's chief financial
officer and treasurer, to also serve as interim president and chief
executive officer.  Mr. Sieczkarek will remain as Chairman of the
Company's Board of Directors.

A description of Mr. McGovern's compensatory arrangement with the
Company in connection with his position as the chief financial
officer and treasurer, which included a base salary of $298,000 per
annum effective July 17, 2017, is disclosed in the Company's Proxy
Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 18, 2018.
  
On Oct. 9, 2018, upon recommendation by the Compensation Committee
of the Board, the Board approved amending the Non-Employee Director
Compensation Plan for the 2018 fiscal year, effective Oct. 1, 2018,
to include cash compensation for a non-employee Chairman of the
Board in the amount of $52,000 per annum, in addition to the base
cash compensation for a non-employee director in the amount of
$30,000 per annum.  Since Mr. Sieczkarek remains as the Chairman of
the Board but is no longer an employee of the Company, he is now
entitled to the cash compensation of $82,000 per annum and the
other compensation under the Amended Plan.

                  About NovaBay Pharmaceuticals

Based in Emeryville, California, NovaBay Pharmaceuticals --
http://www.novabay.com/-- is a medical device company
predominately focused on eye care.  The Company is currently
focused primarily on commercializing Avenova, a prescription
product sold in the United States for cleansing and removing
foreign material including microorganisms and debris from skin
around the eye, including the eyelid.

Novabay reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $7.40 million
in 2017, a net loss and comprehensive loss of $13.15 million in
2016, and a net loss and comprehensive loss of $18.97 million in
2015.  As of June 30, 2018, Novabay had $11.70 million in total
assets, $4.27 million in total liabilities and $7.42 million in
total stockholders' equity.

As of June 30, 2018, the Company's cash and cash equivalents were
$6.8 million, compared to $3.2 million as of Dec. 31, 2017.  The
Company has sustained operating losses for the majority of its
corporate history and expects that its 2018 expenses will exceed
its 2018 revenues, as the Company continues to re-invest in its
Avenova commercialization efforts.  The Company expects to continue
incurring operating losses and negative cash flows until revenues
reach a level sufficient to support ongoing growth and operations.


OPTICAL HOLDINGS: Taps Jackson Lewis as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Optical Holdings of Puerto Rico, LLC and OHI of Puerto Rico LLC
seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
New Jersey to hire Jackson Lewis, LLC as special counsel.

The firm will provide the Debtors with legal advice on labor
matters.  Jackson Lewis will charge these hourly rates:

        Members        $285
        Of Counsel     $285
        Associates     $195
        Paralegal      $120

Juan Felipe Santos, Esq., managing principal and litigation manager
at Jackson Lewis, disclosed in a court filing that the firm and its
attorneys are "disinterested" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Juan Felipe Santos, Esq.
     Jackson Lewis, LLC
     American International Plaza
     250 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 404
     San Juan, PR 00918
     Phone: 787-522-7305 / 787-522-7315
     Fax: 787-522-7306
     Email: Juan.Santos@jacksonlewis.com

               About Optical Holdings of Puerto Rico

Optical Holdings of Puerto Rico, LLC, owns health and personal care
stores.  OHI of Puerto Rico, LLC is an eyewear supplier in
Springfield, New Jersey.

Optical Holdings and OHI sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case Nos. 18-29070 and 18-29071) on
Sept. 25, 2018.  At the time of the filing, Optical Holdings
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million.  OHI estimated assets of less than $1 million and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Stacey L. Meisel
presides over the cases.  The Debtors tapped Greenberg Traurig LLP
as their legal counsel.


OUTCOMES GROUP: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 Corporate Family Rating and
a B3-PD Probability of Default rating to Outcomes Group Holdings,
Inc., parent company of Paradigm Acquisition Corp. . Moody's also
assigned a B2 rating to the company's proposed first lien senior
secured credit facilities, and a Caa2 rating to the company's
second lien senior secured term loan. The proceeds from the credit
facilities, along with an equity contribution from Ontario
Municipal Employees Retirement System will fund the buyout of the
company from the current owner, Summit Partner, L.P. and pay
transaction fees and expenses. The rating outlook is stable.

All ratings are subject to review of final documentation. At the
close of the transaction, Moody's will withdraw all existing
ratings at Paradigm Acquisition Corp.

Moody's assigned the following ratings:

Outcomes Group Holdings, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, at B3

Probability of Default Rating, at B3-PD

$50 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facility, at
B2 (LGD3)

$450 million senior secured first lien term loan, at B2 (LGD3)

$155 million senior secured second lien term loan, at Caa2 (LGD5)

The rating outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 Corporate Family Rating reflects Paradigm's high financial
leverage following the leveraged buyout. Moody's anticipates pro
forma debt/EBITDA of around 7.5x. The rating also reflects the
company's modest absolute size based on revenues, and relatively
high customer concentration within the niche sub-segment of the
worker's compensation case management industry. With pro forma
revenues of $621 million (LTM as of June 30, 2018), Paradigm's
scale is modest when compared to its customers, which are mostly
insurance companies and large third-party administrators (TPAs).
The rating is supported by the company's leading market position,
high barriers to entry and solid earnings growth prospects as it
expands its service offerings. Further, Paradigm has a good track
record of organic revenue growth and managing the underwriting risk
within its contracts. Moody's anticipates that the company will
generate solid free cash flow despite its very high debt/EBITDA.

The stable outlook incorporates Moody's expectation that the
company has healthy earnings growth prospects but that debt will
also likely increase to fund acquisitions and shareholder
dividends.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company's operating
performance deteriorates, if it becomes increasingly aggressive
with respect to dividends or acquisitions or if liquidity weakens.
Ratings could also be downgraded if free cash flow turns negative,
or if the company is unable to reduce debt to EBITDA towards 7.0x
over the next 12-18 months.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company achieves greater scale
and customer diversification. Further, if the company uses free
cash flow to repay debt or earnings grow such that debt to EBITDA
is sustained around 6.0x, Moody's could upgrade the ratings.

Paradigm is the leading nationwide provider of outsourced
catastrophic worker's compensation case management services for
insurance companies and self-insured employers. The company's
product offerings include acute and ongoing catastrophic, and case
management services for traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord
injuries, amputations, burns, wounds, and chronic pain.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.


OUTCOMES GROUP: S&P Assigns B Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' corporate credit rating to
Outcomes Group Holdings Inc. (Paradigm). The outlook is stable. S&P
said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B' debt rating to
Paradigm's planned $50 million five-year first-lien revolver and
$450 million seven-year first-lien term loan. The recovery ratings
on the first-lien credit facilities are '3', reflecting our
expectation for meaningful recovery (50%-70%, rounded estimate:
60%) in the event of a payment default. We also assigned our 'CCC+'
debt rating to the planned $155 million eight-year second-lien term
loan. The recovery rating on the second-lien term loan is '6',
reflecting our expectation of negligible (0%) recovery in the event
of payment default."

The rating action follows OMER Private Equity's announced
acquisition of a majority stake in Paradigm Outcomes (joining
existing owners Summit Partners and management--which will retain
minority stakes). The new holding company Outcomes Group Holdings
Inc. (Paradigm) will issue $605 million in funded debt to
effectuate the transaction. This will result in adjusted leverage
of 7.1x (pro forma as of June 30, 2018, including S&P's
adjustments), which it expects Paradigm to lower to 6.25x-6.75x in
2019 based on reported EBITDA growth of at least 10% and required
first-lien debt amortization. S&P expects EBITDA interest coverage
of 2x in 2019.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our view that Paradigm's
expanded product portfolio and client base, combined with a
supportive employment environment, should drive strong revenue
growth in 2018-2019. This could offset relatively stagnant WC
claims volumes industrywide in recent years. We expect Paradigm's
EBITDA margin in its core "outcomes" product to remain relatively
stable due to its historically conservative underwriting standards.
But we expect its overall EBITDA margin to decrease slightly as it
boosts lower-margin products/services. We expect adjusted leverage
of 6.25x-6.75x and EBITDA interest coverage of 2x in 2019. The
company's deleveraging pace will depend on its use of projected
free cash flows for debt reduction, acquisitions, and and/or
shareholder dividends.

"We could lower our ratings in 2018-2019 if Paradigm raises
additional debt and/or suffers sustained business losses causing
adjusted leverage to remain above 7x or EBITDA interest coverage to
fall below 2x on a sustained basis. This could result from the
unexpected loss of multiple key clients, higher-than-expected
medical costs, and/or acquisition execution issues. Flat to
negative revenue growth coupled with an EBITDA margin decline of
1%-2% would likely result in adjusted leverage of at least 7x. We
would also consider a downgrade if liquidity becomes constrained so
that we expect liquidity cash sources to fall to less than 1.2x of
expected uses."

An upgrade is unlikely in 2018-2019 based on Paradigm's long-term
financial policies stemming from its private-equity ownership,
which make sustained deleveraging unlikely. S&P could raise the
ratings if Paradigm substantially grows, diversify its business
profitably, and lower leverage to less than 5x on a sustained
basis; or if it substantially improved client concentrations.


OWENS & MINOR: Bank Debt Trades at 6% Off
-----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Owens & Minor Inc.
is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 94.42
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 2.91 percentage points from
the previous week. Owens & Minor pays 450 basis points above LIBOR
to borrow under the $500 million facility. The bank loan matures on
May 9, 2025. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and Standard & Poor's gave
a 'BB' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest gainers
and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with five or
more bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday, September
28.


PAN AMERICA: Fitch Affirms 'B+/BB' Issuer Default Ratings
---------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Pan American Energy's Long-Term Foreign
Currency Issuer Default Rating at 'B+' and Long-Term Local Currency
IDR at 'BB'. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

PAE's strong business position, large reserves base, low leverage
and strong operating performance support its ratings. The Foreign
Currency IDR, one-notch higher than Argentina's country ceiling, is
supported by the company's reliable and strong cash flow
generation, high level of dollar-denominated export revenues
relative to total debt, strong parent ownership, and a good track
record of payment during stressed sovereign scenarios. PAE has
ample liquidity and proven access to financial markets. PAE's
ratings are constrained by its exposure to political interference
in Argentina, and has endured a volatile domestic business
environment and inflationary pressure on its cost structures.

The 'BB-'/'RR3' ratings on the USD500 million senior unsecured
notes due in 2021 are one notch above PAE's Foreign Currency IDR
and reflect expected above-average recovery for creditors, given a
default. Although a bespoke recovery analysis yields a higher than
70% recovery, given a default, Fitch's Country-Specific Treatment
of Recovery Ratings Criteria allows for a one notch uplift for
recovery whenever there is a two notch rating differential between
a company's Foreign Currency and Local Currency ratings. In
instances when the difference between the Foreign Currency and
Local Currency rating is one notch, or less, Argentine corporates
would be capped at an average recovery rating (RR) of 'RR4', which
is in the range of 31% to 50%.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Integrated Business Position: The merger of PAE and Axion Energy
formulated the largest private integrated energy company in
Argentina with revenues outside of Argentina. PAE's upstream
business is the largest private Oil & Gas Company in Argentina, and
the largest private entity with 20% market share in oil production
and 16% in gas production in Argentina. In 2017, Axion was the
third largest refiner in Argentina with a 15% market share with 90
thousand barrels a day of refining capacity located in Campana
within the Buenos Aires province. Prior to the merger, Axion on
average contribute to 50% of PAE's oil sales. With the acquisition,
Fitch believes PAE is poised to realize economies of scale as an
integrated energy company, as it continues with Axion's expansion
of its Campana refinery to 130,000 barrels day..

Solid Production Profile: As Fitch expected, the company's
production continues to remain stable despite a double-digit
inflation rate and a difficult economic climate in Argentina, even
though average production remained flat year over year in 2017 to
229.7 thousands boed, evenly split between oil and gas production.
As of year-end 2017, gas comprised 54% of sales, slightly edging
oil. From 2015 to 2017, PAE's reserve replacement ratio was 104%.

Strong Hydrocarbon Reserves: Fitch believes PAE has a strong
reserve life of 17.3 years, providing ample flexibility to adjust
capex investment. As of YE 2017, PAE reported 1,562 million of boe
in 1P reserves, 63% of which is oil. PAE has a strong concession
life. The company's Golfo San Jorge basin, Cerro Dragon, accounted
for 86.2% of its total oil production, 26% of gas production and
72% of reserves. Operating concessions expire in 2046 - 2047.

Financial Strength and Capital Structure: PAE's ratings reflect the
company's robust metrics and Fitch's expectations for moderate
leverage during the next three years despite increased capex needs.
In YE 2017, PAE's EBITDA decreased slightly to USD1.5 billion from
USD2.1 billion in 2016, representing a 2017 EBITDA margins that is
49% down from 56.2%. The nearly 30% decrease in EBITDA reflects the
18% decrease in revenues due to the total decrease in production of
5% and decrease of 24% for realized oil prices.

PAE's capital structure remains strong, even after the merger of
Axion Energy, when it absorbed USD750 million of additional debt,
resulting in a pro forma gross leverage defined as total debt to
EBITDA for 2017 of 1.3x, a moderate increase from PAE's stand-alone
gross leverage of 1.1x during the same time period. As of December
2017, PAE was Argentina's largest proved reserves holder, with oil
and gas reserves of 1.562 billion barrels of oil equivalent (boe),
of which 63% is oil, equivalent to 17.3 years of production (24
years for oil, 11.4 years for natural gas and 17.3 years of oil +
gas). PAE's leverage, including Axion's debt, is low at
approximately USD1.34 of debt/barrel (bbl) of proved reserves in
2017, up from USD1.09 of debt/barrel (bbl) of proved reserves in
2016. The company historically increased reserves and production
volumes sustainably, despite operating in a challenging
environment.

Exposure to Government Interference: The Argentine government has a
history of significant interference in the oil and gas sector, as
reflected by the regulations related to investment levels in the
oil and gas sector and domestic price references. The government's
unorthodox economic policies and continued intervention in the
different aspects of the economy remains a key consideration when
assessing Argentine corporates. For example, in July of 2018, the
Argentine government attempted to formulate and agreement with top
upstream and downstream company's in Argentina to temporarily
introduce price controls. As an integrated energy company, PAE has
the flexibility to adjust its refinery production levels and
increase either domestic or export oil sales as a hedge against
government interference.

Strong Ownership: PAE is a 50/50 strategic alliance between BP plc
(A/Stable) and BC Energy Investments Corp. (BC) formerly known as
Bridas Corporation. BC is also a 50/50 joint venture between
Argentine Bridas Energy Holding Ltd. and China National Offshore
Oil Corporation International Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of
CNOOC Limited (CNOOC; Long-Term IDR: A+/Stable). Prior to the
merger, Bridas owned 100% of Axion Energy. PAE's strong ownership
does not have direct impact on its credit rating, but given both
company's strong track record and scale, Fitch does consider its
shareholders will support the company if it is needed.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Pan American Energy's (PAE) Foreign Currency IDR (FC IDR) continues
to be constrained by the Argentine Country Ceiling at 'B'; however,
its medium production size of 229.7 thousands of boed and strong
reserve life of 17.3 years compares favorably to other 'BB' rated
oil and gas E&P producers. These peers include Tecpetrol
Internacional (BB+/Stable) with production of 130 thousands of
boed, Murphy Oil Corporation (BB/Stable) with 171 thousands of boed
and YPF SA (B/Stable) with 475 thousands of boed. Further, PAE
reported 1,562 million boe of 1P reserves at the end of 2017
equating to a reserve life of 17.3 years, higher than Murphy Oil's
at 11.2 years and Tecpetrol's with 10.4 years. Fitch expects the
company will be able to maintain its strong reserve life.

PAE's capital structure remained strong in year-end 2017. As of LTM
2Q18, the company's gross leverage measured by total debt to LTM
EBITDA is 1.3x, slightly up from 1.1x in year-end 2017 due to the
acquisition of Axion Energy. Fitch estimates its 2019 gross
leverage to be 1.7x in line with Tecpetrol (1.1x) and slightly
better than Murphy Oil (2.3x) and YPF (2.1x). On debt to 1P reserve
basis, Fitch estimates PAE's Debt as of 2Q18 to YE2017 1P reserves
as USD1.58 boe compared to Tecpetrol (USD2.67boe), Murphy Oil
(USD4.01boe) and YPF (USD10.49boe). PAE operates in a lower
operating environment, which is a constraining factor for its
ratings, but received a one notch uplift from the country ceiling
due to its cash flows from export revenues and cash flows from
abroad.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Fitch's Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Upstream production growth in the low single-digit percentage
level per year

  - An average Refinery utilization capacity rate of 83% in 2019
through 2021;

  - Improved refinery production capacity at La Campana project
with expansion project completed in 2019.

  - Long-term energy prices converge with world prices over the
next five years;

  - EBITDA margins expected to remain at an average of 50% for the
next three years

  - Annual Capex going forward consistent with 2016 capex cut of
approximately USD1 billion;

  - Dividends to average 75% of net income from 2018 through 2021;

  - Gross leverage metrics in the 1.0x to 1.7x range in the short
to medium term.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - An upgrade of Argentina's ratings and country ceilings may
result in a positive rating action;

  - Improved diversification of cash flows outside of Argentina
adequately covering debt service by 1.5x or more for a time period
of greater than 18 months could reflect in an upgrade.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - PAE's ratings could be negatively affected by a deterioration
of Argentina's credit quality combined with a material increase in
the government's interference in the sector. An increase in
leverage above 3.5x coupled with a decrease in interest coverage
below 4.5x could also negatively affect ratings.

LIQUIDITY

Strong Liquidity:  PAME's total cash and equivalents amounted to
approximately USD200 million as of June 30, 2018, which is
approximately 30% of short-term debt totalling USD660 million.
Given the company's strong operational track record along with
strong parent company support, Fitch does not anticipate any
difficulties for the company in tapping local and international
debt markets in order to refinance short-term debt.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Pan American Energy LLC.

  -- Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR at 'B+'; Outlook Stable;

  -- Long-Term Local Currency IDR at 'BB'; Outlook Stable;

Pan American Energy LLC Sucursal Argentina's (PAME)

  -- Senior unsecured notes due 2021 at 'BB-'/'RR3.'


PARKLAND FUEL: Moody's Affirms 'Ba3' CFR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed Parkland Fuel Corporation's Ba3
Corporate Family Rating, Ba3-PD Probability of Default Rating
(PDR), B1 senior unsecured notes rating and downgraded the
Speculative Grade Liquidity rating to SGL-4 from SGL-3. The outlook
remains stable.

The affirmation of Parkland's ratings follows its announcement of
an agreement to acquire 75% of SOL Investments Limited and its
subsidiaries (collectively, SOL) for a total consideration of about
C$1.6 billion. SOL, a privately-held company, is the largest
integrated fuel marketer in the Caribbean. The purchase will be
funded with about C$1.1 billion in debt and about C$500 million of
Parkland equity issued to SOL Ownership of the remaining 25% of SOL
will be exercisable as early as mid-2021 through a put/call
agreement under which Parkland may elect to acquire SOL or SOL may
elect to sell its remaining stake to Parkland.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Parkland Fuel Corporation

  Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-4 from
SGL-3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Parkland Fuel Corporation

  Outlook, Remains Stable

Affirmations:

Issuer: Parkland Fuel Corporation

  Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba3-PD

  Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

  Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B1 (LGD5 from
LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Pro forma for the proposed transaction, Parkland's (Ba3 stable)
credit profile benefits from: (1) a strong market presence as the
largest fuel marketer in both Canada and the Caribbean supported by
good brand recognition; (2) established supply channels in key
geographies providing competitive advantages in sourcing products
and creating barriers to entry; (3) geographic diversification,
with about 25% of EBITDA generated outside of Canada; (4) positive
free cash flow growing to above C$200 million annually in 2019 and
2020 and; 5) pro-forma adjusted debt/EBITDA leverage that is
expected to remain below 4x.

Constraints to Parkland's pro forma credit profile include: (1) an
aggressive acquisition strategy involving periodically elevated
leverage and substantial integration and execution risks with a
developing track record for large-scale transactions; (2) exposure
to multiple new operational, geo-political and regulatory risks
following the acquisition of the Caribbean business; (3) volatility
tied to cash flows from the refinery operation as well as trading
activities (involving the purchase, sale and storage of fuel
products); and (4) weak short-term liquidity caused by the use of
term facilities that need to be refinanced.

Parkland's acquisition of SOL is credit negative. Integrating the
large-scale Caribbean operation in a region where Parkland has no
prior experience involves ongoing operational, regulatory and
geopolitical volatility spanning more than 20 countries. However,
Parkland's closely aligned business model and management's industry
expertise should to some extent limit execution risk. Although
geographic diversification into the Caribbean increases exposure to
long-term business risks inherent with the region; the acquisition
will enhance Parkland's scale and cash flow substantially.
Parkland's Ba3 rating is positioned to capture the ongoing risks
associated with its aggressive acquisition strategy and reflects
its expectation that the company will manage growth within the
publically stated target leverage of between 2.0-3.5x.

Parkland's liquidity is weak (SGL-4) because it is dependent on two
term facilities. The company needs to refinance or extend the
maturity dates of these facilities, which it intends to do, prior
to the closing of the transaction. The company currently has two
revolving credit facilities for C$500 million and US$50 million
with C$345 million outstanding as of June 2018 and these facilities
mature in 2021. Financing for the acquisition is comprised of a
US$250 million (C$325 million) term loan, a C$300 million term
facility and a draw of C$468 million on a senior secured term
facility.

The stable outlook reflects its expectation that leverage will
remain under 4.0x and free cash flow will remain positive while
integration of the new Caribbean business is executed smoothly and
that adequate liquidity is restored with a replacement of short
term financing for the acquisitions with longer-dated debt.

The ratings could be upgraded if Parkland successfully integrates
its recent acquisitions while sustaining debt/EBITDA below 3.5x
(pro-forma 3.8x for Dec-2018) while maintaining adequate liquidity.


The ratings could be downgraded if Parkland sustains debt/EBITDA
above 4.5x (pro-forma 3.8x for Dec-2018) or if liquidity is not
restored to adequate in a timely manner.

Parkland Fuel Corporation, headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, is
the largest marketer of fuel and petroleum products in Canada and
owner of the Burnaby refinery in Vancouver. The company is also a
retailor and distributor of refined petroleum products across eight
states in the US. Following the acquisition of 75% of Sol
Investments Limited, Parkland will also become the largest, and
vertically integrated, fuel marketer in the Caribbean, with
shipping and distribution infrastructure throughout the region.
Revenue for the twelve months as of June 2018 was C$13 billion.


PARKLAND FUEL: S&P Hikes Issuer Credit Rating to BB, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Alta.-based independent fuel marketer Parkland Fuel Corp. announced
its acquisition of a 75% interest in Caribbean-based SOL
Investments Ltd., including working capital, for approximately
C$1.6 billion. Pro forma the transaction, Parkland will generate
about C$1 billion EBITDA annually.

As a result, S&P Global Ratings raised its issuer credit rating on
Parkland to 'BB' from 'BB-'. The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P Global Ratings raised its issue-level rating
on the company's unsecured debt to 'BB' from 'BB-', and revised its
recovery rating on the debt to '4' from '3' reflecting higher
amounts of priority-debt on a pro forma basis. A '4' recovery
rating indicates our expectation of average (30%-50%; rounded
estimate 45%) recovery in default.

S&P Global Ratings also assigned its 'BBB-' issue-level rating and
'1' recovery rating to Parkland's secured debt comprising a C$1.4
billion bank debt and a US$250 million term loan. A '1' recovery
rating represents our expectation of very high (90%-100%, rounded
estimate 95%) recovery in a default scenario. S&P's recovery
analysis assumes any bridge financing that the company assumes to
backstop the transaction is refinanced with unsecured debt within
the next couple of months.

The company plans to fund the acquisition through C$518 million of
equity and the rest with debt. Pro forma the acquisition closing,
we expect Parkland to have about C$1.2 billion of secured debt and
about C$2.2 billion of unsecured debt obligations, including about
C$300 million of new unsecured debt.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our view that, given
Parkland's success in integrating acquisitions, there is limited
execution risk in the company integrating the SOL transaction and
generating the synergies as expected. Even though the transaction
would elevate Parkland's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA ratio to about 4x,
we view this to be temporary and expect metrics would reduce to
below 4x within 12 months of the acquisition. Absent any large
acquisitions, we would expect Parkland's run-rate adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA be in the mid-to-high 3x area.

"We could lower the rating in the next two years if Parkland's
earnings are lower than expected or the company faces challenges
that push adjusted debt-to-EBITDA above 4x, with poor prospects for
improving. Macroeconomic headwinds could reduce both c-store
traffic and miles driven that would pressure Parkland's absolute
EBITDA and thus weaken leverage measures. We could, however,
tolerate pro forma adjusted debt-to-EBITDA of up to 4.5x on large
acquisitions, provided the company commits to deleveraging to the
high 3.0x area within 12 months of the transaction.

"We do not expect any positive action in the near term given
Parkland's business risk profile and debt-financed acquisition
strategy. However, if the company improves and sustains adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA below 3x with management's commitment to keeping it
at that level including acquisitions, we could consider a positive
action."



PATRIOT COAL: Court Dismisses BDCF Suit and VCLF Countersuit
------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Keith L. Phillips dismissed the case captioned
Black Diamond Commercial Finance, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Virginia
Conservation Legacy Fund, Inc., and ERP Compliant Fuels, Inc.,
Defendants. Virginia Conservation Legacy Fund, Inc., and ERP
Compliant Fuels, Inc., Counter-Claimants, v. Black Diamond
Commercial Finance, LLC, Counter-Defendant, Adv. Proc. No.
16-03105-KLP (Bank. E.D. Va.). VCLF's counterclaim is also
dismissed.

In October 2015, plaintiff Black Diamond Commercial Finance, LLC
brought the action for breach of contract against defendants
Virginia Conservation Legacy Fund, Inc., and its affiliate, ERP
Compliant Fuels, LLC in New York state court. Black Diamond alleges
that the Defendants breached the parties' contract in which Black
Diamond agreed to provide VCLF with exclusive financing to be used
for working capital and specified fees in connection with VCLF's
purchase of certain assets from Patriot Coal Corporation and its
affiliated corporations then debtors-in-possession in consolidated
chapter 11 cases filed in this Court. The Defendants filed a
counterclaim, alleging that it was Black Diamond that breached the
contract, excusing the Defendants' performance thereunder and
entitling them to damages.

The parties entered into a contract that, in essence, created a
partnership that would enable VCLF to acquire certain assets from
Patriot with the financial assistance of Black Diamond. In exchange
for providing the financing, Black Diamond was to receive an
ownership interest in the assets being acquired. The parties agreed
that if the transaction did not occur because Patriot received a
better offer, then they would split the breakup fee to which VCLF
would be entitled as the stalking horse. In addition, VCLF agreed
that it would not seek a replacement for Black Diamond. This
understanding was incorporated into the Commitment Letter.

VCLF was not outbid; however, due primarily to the needs of
Patriot, the transaction upon which the Commitment Letter was based
changed to the substantial detriment of VCLF. Despite the increased
challenges, VCLF, seeking to fulfill its altruistic mission, chose
to move forward with the acquisition. However, Black Diamond, also
acting true to its purpose, was unwilling to offer the same
financing terms in connection with the less attractive investment
opportunity and, under the provisions of the Commitment Letter, was
not obligated to do so. The parties attempted to negotiate mutually
acceptable modifications to the Commitment Letter but were unable
to do so. As a result, the Commitment Letter terminated, with
neither party remaining obligated to the other. VCLF completed the
transaction without Black Diamond but was only able to do so with
the assistance of Patriot and the UMWA. Black Diamond was not
involved and contributed nothing in connection with VCLF's
purchase.

Black Diamond contends that the parties agreed that in exchange for
Black Diamond's delivering the commitment for a loan that it
ultimately chose not to make, Black Diamond is entitled to an
ownership interest in the assets acquired by VCLF; i.e., that its
entitled to the benefits of the partnership that it rejected. There
is no evidence that VCLF agreed to this. More importantly, the
Commitment Letter, which was drafted by Black Diamond's attorney,
does not make this clear; on the contrary, it specifies
consideration for delivering the commitment that does not include
an interest in the assets being acquired. In short, under the facts
of this case and the language of the contract, Black Diamond is not
entitled to an ownership interest in the acquired assets or
anything else.

In sum, Black Diamond had the burden of proving that VCLF breached
the Commitment Letter. It has failed to meet that burden. Neither
has VCLF met its burden of proving that Black Diamond breached the
Commitment Letter. As a result of the changes to the VCLF-Patriot
transaction, Black Diamond was no longer obligated to provide the
financing described in the Commitment Letter. Under the terms of
the Commitment Letter, Black Diamond was allowed to walk away from
the transaction, and that is what it chose to do.

The Court concludes that neither party violated the terms of the
contract at issue and neither party is entitled to damages.
Accordingly, the Court dismisses both Black Diamond's complaint and
VCLF's counterclaim.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept. 28,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2OoeHPu from Leagle.com.

Black Diamond Commercial Finance, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by
Dianne F. Coffino --
dcoffino@cov.com -- Covington & Burling LLP, Dion W. Hayes --
dhayes@mcguirewoods.com -- McGuireWoods LLP, John H. Maddock, III
-- jmaddock@mcguirewoods.com -- McGuireWoods LLP, C. William
Phillips  -- cphillips@cov.com  -- Covington & Burling LLP & David
Zorian Pinsky -- dpinksy@cov.com -- Covington & Burling LLP.

Virginia Conservation Legacy Fund, Inc., Defendant, represented by
Patrick J. Potter, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Joshua I.
Schlenger, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, William Michael
Sullivan, Jr., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP & Andrew M.
Troop , Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

ERP Compliant Fuels, LLC, Defendant, represented by Patrick J.
Potter -- patrick.potter@pillsburylaw.com -- Pillsbury Winthrop
Shaw Pittman LLP, Joshua I. Schlenger --
Joshua.schlenger@pillsburylaw.com -- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP, William Michael Sullivan, Jr., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw
Pittman LLP & Andrew M. Troop, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
LLP.

ERP Compliant Fuels, LLC & Virginia Conservation Legacy Fund, Inc.,
Counter-Claimants, represented by Patrick J. Potter, Pillsbury
Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

Black Diamond Commercial Finance, LLC, Counter-Defendant,
represented by Dianne F. Coffino, Covington & Burling LLP, Dion W.
Hayes, McGuireWoods LLP & John H. Maddock, III, McGuireWoods LLP.


PEDRO'S OF MADISON: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Pedro's of Madison, Inc. as of Oct. 10,
according to a court docket.

                     About Pedro's of Madison

Pedro's of Madison, Inc., is a privately held company in Madison,
Wisconsin, that operates restaurants.  It is a family-friendly
restaurant serving Mexican fare & margaritas in a fiesta-themed
setting.

Pedro's of Madison sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wis. Case No. 18-13142) on Sept. 14,
2018.  In the petition signed by James C. Martine, president/sole
shareholder, the Debtor estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in assets and
$1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  Judge Catherine J. Furay
presides over the case.  Eliza M. Reyes, Esq., at Krekeler
Strother, S.C. is the Debtor's counsel.


PETCO ANIMAL: Bank Debt Trades at 19% Off
-----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Petco Animal
Supplies Inc. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 80.69
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 6.31 percentage points from
the previous week. Petco Animal pays 325 basis points above LIBOR
to borrow under the $2.506 billion facility. The bank loan matures
on January 26, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B2' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'CCC+' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


PETERSON PRODUCE: Taps Galloway Wettermark as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Peterson Produce, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Alabama to hire Galloway,
Wettermark & Rutens, LLP, as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; prosecute actions to protect its interest; and
provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Robert Galloway, Esq., is the primary attorney at Galloway
Wettermark who will handling the case.

Mr. Galloway and his firm do not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its bankruptcy estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert M. Galloway, Esq.
     Galloway, Wettermark & Rutens, LLP
     3263 Cottage Hill Road
     P.O. Box 16629
     Mobile, AL 36616-0629
     Tel: 251-476-4493
     Email: bgalloway@gallowayllp.com

                     Peterson Produce Inc.

Peterson Produce, Inc., is a privately-held trucking company in
Summerdale, Alabama.

Peterson Produce sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 18-03976) on Oct. 1,
2018.  In the petition signed by Paul A. Peterson, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of
$1 million to $10 million.  Judge Henry A. Callaway presides over
the case.


POST HOLDINGS: Egan-Jones Hikes Senior Unsecured Ratings to B
-------------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on October 1, 2018, upgraded the
foreign currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on
debt issued by Post Holdings, Inc. to B from B-.

Post Holdings, Inc. is a consumer packaged goods holding company
headquartered in the suburban St. Louis community of Brentwood,
Missouri. It operates in the center-of-the-store, foodservice, food
ingredient, refrigerated, active nutrition and private label
categories.



PRECISION DRILLING: Fitch Revises Outlook on B+ LT IDR to Positive
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Precision Drilling Corporation's (NYSE:
PDS/TSE: PD) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at 'B+' following the
announcement that Precision has entered into an agreement to
acquire Trinidad Drilling Limited (TSE: TDG). The Rating Outlook
has been revised to Positive from Stable.

The Positive Outlook reflects the credit accretive nature of the
proposed acquisition, which improves asset quality, increases scale
and U.S. exposure, and further supports forecasted positive free
cash flow and lower leverage metrics over the next few years. The
Outlook is expected to be resolved upon the successful execution
and integration of Trinidad, as well as a demonstrated track record
of stable-to-improving utilization rates, rig margins, FCF, and
leverage metrics.

Precision's ratings consider the improved, albeit levelling,
Canadian and U.S. rig counts, favourable asset quality
characteristics for its working rigs, and forecasted positive free
cash flow (FCF), providing an opportunity for gross debt reduction.
These factors are offset by lower than expected recent Canadian rig
activity and leverage that is at the high end of the rating range.
However, Fitch anticipates debt will be reduced over time.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Pending Trinidad Acquisition: Precision's pending agreement to
acquire Trinidad stipulates that the company will acquire all of
Trinidad's shares on the basis of 0.445 common shares of Precision
for each outstanding share of Trinidad. At the close of the
transaction, holders of Trinidad shares will own approximately 29%
of Precision. Precision will also assume $477 million in Trinidad
net debt based on June 30, 2018 financial statements of Trinidad.
The transaction is valued at approximately $1,028 million, or a
EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.6x based on Trinidad's LTM June 2018 EBITDA
of $134 million. Management believes there are $30 million of
synergies in the transaction. Trinidad's fleet of 141 drilling rigs
includes 61 high spec AC rigs that are well aligned for fleet
integration. Precision has identified 50 rigs in the combined fleet
intended as assets for sale. After the rig sale, Precision will
have over 200 active rigs and 322 total rigs, and would become the
third largest driller in the U.S. The transaction is expected to be
completed in late 2018. In August, prior to the transaction
announcement with Precision, Trinidad rejected a hostile takeover
bid from Ensign Energy Services.

Leading Share in Canada: Precision has a leading market share in
Canada with ~25% of the active rigs. Similar to the U.S., Precision
has seen significant improvement in rig counts; however, the
Canadian rig market is seasonally cyclical with peak activity
typically between January and March. Precision's higher-spec Super
Triple rigs face competition from cheaper lower-spec heavy
tele-doubles that are operationally competitive in shallower
geologies (e.g., Montney, Duvernay, heavy oil). This relative
operational substitutability, as well as the surplus of
tele-doubles, has placed a soft-cap on higher-spec day rates.
Precision also has a fleet of 210 service rigs that provide
completion and production (C&P) services mainly across Canada. The
C&P services division realized roughly breakeven results in 2016
and 2017, and although there has been a material pickup in
activity, Fitch expects the segment to contribute minimal EBITDA
going forward.

U.S. Levelling, Structural Risk: Precision has experienced a strong
uptick in U.S. Lower 48 rig activity, consistent with the average
U.S. rig count, but continued rig efficiency gains are increasing
the risk that the U.S. rig count may be structurally lower over the
medium- to long term (see Fitch's: E&Ps Stay Disciplined, Permian
Producers Untroubled, dated October 2018).

Fitch believe the company's "Super Triple" rigs, in conjunction
with ancillary technological offerings, are among the best
pad-capable rigs, which should help these rigs maintain relatively
resilient utilization and day rates. The U.S. rig count has grown
from 658 at December 2016 to 1,047 as of June 2018. Over the same
time, Precision's U.S. rig count has grown from 32 to 72. Fitch
expects Precision's U.S. Lower 48 working rig count to be in the
low-70s with modest incremental growth, while margins improve over
the next couple of years, due to a combination of lower average rig
costs, modest day-rate increases, and additional rig-level
services.

Improving FCF and Liquidity: Fitch's base case for 2018 projects
that Precision, on a standalone basis, will generate approximately
$125 million in free cash flow. Fitch anticipates that Precision
will use the cash to reduce debt. Debt/EBITDA is expected to
decline from 5.8x in 2017 to 5.3x in 2018. Fitch estimates the
Trinidad acquisition would bring pro forma debt/EBITDA down to
4.7x, or 4.4x, assuming all $30 million of synergies are attained.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Precision Drilling has entered into an agreement to acquire
Trinidad Drilling Limited (Trinidad, TSE: TDG) in exchange for
shares of Precision. The transaction is valued at approximately
$1,028 million, including the assumption of approximately $477
million in Trinidad net debt. As a result of the transaction,
Precision would have a North American fleet of over 200 active rigs
and 322 total rigs, and would make the company the third largest
driller in the U.S. The company also has an international rig fleet
(eight working rigs) that principally operate in the Middle East.
Nabors Industries, Ltd. (Nabors; BB/Negative) has somewhat similar
U.S. onshore market share. Nabors, however, has a considerable
international onshore working rig fleet (93 rigs as of June 30,
2018), which provides the company with a favourable counterbalance
to the more volatile North American rig count and cash flow profile
through-the-cycle. Fitch believes that Nabors' international
first-mover and scale advantage will benefit the company over the
medium to long term as evidenced by the recent Saudi Aramco joint
venture. Fitch considers Precision's asset quality to be relatively
high with the "Super Triple" rigs being among the best pad-capable
rigs, which should help these rigs maintain relatively resilient
utilization and day rates through the cycle. Although Precision has
slightly lower leverage metrics than Nabors, Nabors has a
significantly larger asset base. Fitch believes that free cash flow
will be used for gross debt reduction and should allow for
substantial improvement over time.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer:

  -- WTI oil price of $65 in 2018, $60 in 2019, and long-term price
of $55;

  -- Henry Hub gas price of $2.75 in 2018 and long-term price of
$3;

  -- Levelling Canadian and U.S. Lower 48 rig counts at above 50
and 70, respectively, through the forecasted period;

  -- International working rig count remains flat at approximately
eight rigs over the next few years;

  -- Average corporate rig margins remain in the low- to mid-30%
range over the next few years;

  -- Completion & production services EBITDA remains in the C$15 to
C$20 million range over the next few years.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

  -- Successful completion and integration of the Trinidad
acquisition, including achieving cost synergies;

  -- Demonstrated commitment by management to lower gross debt
levels;

  -- Ability to maintain a competitive asset base in a
credit-conscious manner;

  -- Track record of rig utilization and day rates suggesting
stability in cash flow;

  -- Improved liquidity and financial flexibility outlook;

  -- Mid-cycle gross debt/EBITDA below 4.5x on a sustainable
basis.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

  -- Failure to manage FCF that reduces liquidity and debt
reduction capacity;

  -- Structural deterioration in rig fundamentals that results in
weaker than expected financial flexibility;

  -- Mid-cycle gross debt/EBITDA above 5.5x on a sustained basis.

LIQUIDITY

Strengthening Balance Sheet: As of June 30, 2018, Precision had $95
million in cash and $677 million available on its revolver.
Precision has a $US500 million revolving revolver, which was
undrawn as of June 30, 2018. The revolver matures in 2021. At
closing of the proposed Trinidad transaction, the revolver will
increase by $US100 million to $US600 million. The next debt
maturity is in 2021. In the Trinidad transaction, Precision will
assume a $US350 million note that is due in 2025.

Fitch expects Precision to be free cash flow positive with and
without the Trinidad transaction. Although there are no near-term
debt maturities, Fitch expects Precision will use the cash to
reduce debt when the bonds become callable.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch affirms the following

Precision Drilling Corporation

  -- Long-Term IDR at 'B+';

  -- Senior secured revolver at 'BB+'/RR1;

  -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB-'/RR3;

The Rating Outlook has been revised to Positive from Negative.


PRECISION DRILLING: S&P Puts 'BB' ICR on CreditWatch Positive
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it placed its 'BB' long-term issuer credit
rating and 'BB' senior unsecured debt rating on Calgary,
Alta.-based Precision Drilling Corp. on CreditWatch with positive
implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows the announcement that Precision
will acquire Trinidad Drilling Ltd. in an all-equity transaction
based on 0.445 common shares of Precision for each share
outstanding of Trinidad. On the transaction's completion,
Precision's existing shareholders would own 71% of the combined
company whereas Trinidad's existing shareholders would own the
remaining 29%. The transaction value is approximately C$1.03
billion, including the assumption of about C$477 million in
Trinidad net debt as of June 30, 2018.

Precision's combination with Trinidad could significantly improve
the company's existing financial risk profile, due to the larger
revenue, EBITDA, and cash flow generation from the combined entity,
which should outpace the incremental debt being assumed. Based on
our existing forecasts for both companies, coupled with potential
synergies, S&P believes there is at least a one-in-two chance that
pro forma three-year (2019-2021) average funds from
operating-to-debt ratio could strengthen above 30% and free
operating cash flow-to-debt above 10%, which would support a higher
rating.

S&P said, "The CreditWatch placement reflects our view that there
is at least one-in-two chance that Precision's credit profile would
improve after acquiring Trinidad because of enhanced credit metrics
for the combined entity. The improvement in the company's financial
risk profile could result in a one-notch upgrade. We expect to
resolve the CreditWatch placement when the transaction is complete
by the end of 2018."


PRODUCT QUEST: Committee Taps Whiteford Taylor as Co-Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Ei LLC, an
affiliate of Product Quest Manufacturing LLC, received approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North
Carolina to hire Whiteford Taylor & Preston, LLP.

Whiteford will serve as co-counsel with Blanco Tackabery &
Matamoros, P.A., another firm tapped by the committee to be its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the committee regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the committee in negotiation with the
Debtor; investigate and evaluate potential claims of the Debtor's
estate; evaluate any proposed financing or asset sale; and provide
other legal services related to the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Dennis Shaffer       Partner       $565
     Michael Hastings     Partner       $595
     Brandy Rapp          Partner       $440
     Jennifer Wuebker     Associate     $345
     Kathleen McCruden    Paralegal     $210

Dennis Shaffer, Esq., a partner at Whiteford, disclosed in a court
filing that he and his firm are "disinterested" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Dennis J. Shaffer, Esq.,
     Whiteford Taylor & Preston, LLP
     7 Saint Paul Street
     Baltimore, MD 21202-1636
     Phone: 410.347.9437
     Fax: 410.223.4337
     Email: dshaffer@wtplaw.com

                About Product Quest Manufacturing

Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC, is a manufacturer of
over-the-counter drugs and cosmetics, as well as some prescription
drugs and animal health products.

Product Quest Manufacturing and its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Lead Case
No. 18-50946) on Sept. 7, 2018.  At the time of the filing, Product
Quest estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and
liabilities of $100 million to $500 million.

Judge Lena M. James presides over Product Quest's cases.

The Debtors tapped Northen Blue LLP as their legal counsel; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as their claims, noticing, and
balloting agent.

On Sept. 24, 2018, William Miller, U.S. bankruptcy administrator,
appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 case of Ei, LLC, an affiliate of Product Quest.  The
committee tapped Blanco Tackabery & Matamoros, P.A. and Whiteford
Taylor & Preston, LLP as its legal counsel.


PRODUCT QUEST: Sets Bidding Procedures for Assets
-------------------------------------------------
Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC, and affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina to
authorize the bidding procedures in connection with the auction
sale of assets, consisting of their real property (land, buildings
and permanent fixtures), machinery and equipment, office furniture
and equipment, vehicles, and customer lists and related data,
unless sold, assigned, transferred, or otherwise administered in
the case prior to the auction.

The Debtors retained Conway MacKenzie Management Services, LLC, to
provide an interim CEO who reports directly to the Board of
Managers, and, as necessary, other temporary personnel who report
directly to the CEO.  

On Sept.7, 2018, the Debtors filed their Cash Collateral Motion,
and after notice and hearing on Sept. 13, 2018, the Court entered
the Cash Collateral Order on Sept. 18, 2018.  As set forth in the
Cash Collateral Order, substantially all the Debtors' assets are
subject to liens or security interests securing a claim in excess
of $153 million.

The Debtors have determined, due to the challenges facing the
Debtors and in the exercise of their business judgment, that it
would not be in the best interest of their estates to attempt to
restart operations and restructure the existing secured and
unsecured indebtedness, and that a sale of their assets would
likely result in the best recovery for all creditors.

The Debtors intend to sell the Sale Assets without the retention of
an investment banker. In that regard, Conway has already received
numerous inquiries from potential strategic buyers and liquidators,
obtained non-disclosure agreements prior to releasing any
information, responded to questions about existing assets, and
scheduled appointments for interested parties to visit the
facility.  In conjunction with the proposed Bidding Procedures,
Conway will continue these services, so that potential bidders can
conduct their due diligence, and with the assistance of the
Debtors' counsel receive and evaluate bids at an auction pursuant
to the proposed Bidding Procedures.  Qualifying Bids will be tested
in the marketplace by the sale and bidding process to ensure that
the estates realize the maximum value for the Sale Assets.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Oct. 26, 2018 at 4:00 p.m.

     b. Initial Bid: A fixed price, subject to the ability to
increase such price(s) at the Auction, payable in immediately
available funds at closing.

     c. Deposit: 5% of the Sale Price

     d. Auction: The Auction will be held on Nov. 5, 2018,
commencing at 10:00 a.m. (ET), at the Debtors' premises located at
2865 N. Cannon Blvd., Kannapolis, North Carolina.

     e. Bid Increments: Each subsequent bid by a Qualified Bidder
will be in increments that increase that aggregate consideration
above the previous bid by such amount as may be determined by the
Debtors and Agent in their sole discretion.

     f. Sale Hearing: Nov. (TBD), 2018

     g. Closing: As soon as practicable but in any event within 3
days of the date on which the Sale Order becomes a final,
non-appealable order

     h. Objection Deadline: Nov. 12, 2018

Notwithstanding the foregoing and subject to the Challenge
Provisions as set forth in the Interim Cash Collateral Order, in
connection with the sale or other disposition of all or any portion
of the Aggregate Collateral, Madison Capital Funding, LLC in its
capacity as Agent for the Lenders will have the right to use the
Prepetition Debt or any part thereof to credit bid with respect to
any bulk or piecemeal sale of all or any portion of the Sale
Assets.

By the Motion, the Debtors ask that the Court:

     a. Conducts the Bidding Procedures Hearing to be scheduled on
an expedited basis as the Court permits.

     b. Following the Bidding Procedures Hearing, enters the
Bidding Procedures Order, approving the proposed bidding
procedures, which, among other things: (i) establish the
requirements for Qualifying Bids; (ii) establish a deadline for
submission of Qualifying Bids; (iii) approve the bidding procedures
related to the conduct of the Auction; (iv) approve the form and
manner of notices of the proposed sale of the Sale Assets, the
Auction, any proposed assumption and assignment of executory
contracts or unexpired leases and any cure costs associated
therewith, and the Sale Hearing; (v) authorize and schedule an
Auction at which the Debtors will solicit the highest or best bids
for the Sale Assets; (vi) authorize and set the time, date and
place of a later hearing to consider the sale of some or all of the
Sale Assets, including any proposed assumption and assignment of
executory contracts and unexpired leases and proposed cure costs
related thereto; and (vii) establish deadlines for objections to
any of the foregoing.

The Debtors further ask that, following the Sale Hearing, the Court
enters the Sale Order, which, among other things:

     a. Authorizes and approves the sale by the Debtors of the Sale
Assets to the Prevailing Bidder(s) and, under certain circumstances
to the Back-up Bidder(s).

     b. Authorizes and approves the assumption and assignment of
those executory contracts and unexpired leases, if any, which are
designated for assumption and assignment by the purchaser(s) of any
of the Sale Assets.

     c. Subject to consummation of the sale and payment in full of
all consideration under the applicable asset purchase agreement(s),
transfers any and all claims, liens, encumbrances and interests in
the Sale Assets to the proceeds of sale, with the same validity and
priority as such claims, liens, encumbrances and interest applied
against the Sale Assets immediately prior to the consummation of
the sale, except as otherwise specifically provided in the
applicable asset purchase agreement and consented to by Agent.

     d. Grants such other and further relief as the Court deems
just and proper.

To streamline the auction process, the Debtors believe that it is
important that bidders use a common asset purchase agreement
template to be prepared by the counsel for the Debtors and provided
to potential bidders.  The Debtors intend to give notice of the
Motion, the Bidding Procedures, the Bidding Procedures Hearing, the
Auction, the Assignment Notice and the Sale Hearing as follows:

     a. Serve a copy of the Motion on the parties on the Master
Service List established in these cases.

     b. Within three business days after entry of the Bidding
Procedures Order, serve copies of the Bidding Procedures Order, the
Bidding Procedures and the Sale Notice on the Notice Parties.

     c. Serve a copy of the Assignment Notice at least ten days
prior to the Sale Hearing to the parties on the Master Service List
and all non-debtor parties to the Debtors' executory contracts and
unexpired leases whose contracts or leases are designated to be
assumed and assigned at and in conjunction with the closing of
approved sales.

The Debtors submit that the foregoing is sufficient notice of the
Bidding Procedures, the Auction, the Assignment Notice, deadlines
for objections, the Sale Hearing, the proposed sale by the Debtors
of the Sale Assets, and any proposed assumption and assignment of
executory contracts and unexpired leases which are designated for
assumption and assignment by purchaser(s) of any of the Sale
Assets.

By the Motion, the Debtors intend to liquidate the Sale Assets in
order to monetize such assets and remit the proceeds to Agent for
application to the Prepetition Debt in accordance with the terms of
the Cash Collateral Order and as provided in the Sale Order.  The
Debtors strongly believe that, in furtherance of this goal, they
can and will do all that is reasonably possible to secure the
highest or best possible offer for the Sale Assets under the
circumstances.  For all of the foregoing reasons, the relief
requested in the Motion is a product of sound business judgment and
is in the best interests of the Debtors, their creditors,
employees, estates and other stakeholders, and should be granted.

The Debtors ask that, subject to consummation of the sale and
payment in full of all consideration under the applicable asset
purchase agreement(s), the sale and transfer of the Sale Assets be
approved free and clear of all liens.  In this instance, the
Debtors believe that Madison Capital Funding LLC, as Agent for the
Lenders is the only party holding or asserting a lien upon or
security interest in the Sale Assets, and the Debtors anticipate
that the Agent will consent to the transaction presented for
approval at the Sale Hearing.

By separate motion, the Debtors will ask authority to assume and
assign, or to reject, certain executory contracts and unexpired
leases in conjunction with the Auction.

A copy of the APA and the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Product_Quest_115_Sales.pdf

                 About Product Quest Manufacturing

Product Quest Manufacturing, LLC, is a manufacturer of
over-the-counter drugs and cosmetics, as well as some prescription
drugs and animal health products.

Product Quest Manufacturing and its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Lead Case
No. 18-50946) on Sept. 7, 2018.  At the time of the filing, Product
Quest estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and
liabilities of $100 million to $500 million.  Judge Lena M. James
presides over Product Quest's cases.  The Debtors tapped Northen
Blue LLP as their legal counsel; and Kurtzman Carson Consultants
LLC as their claims, noticing, and balloting agent.



REJUVI LABORATORY: Taps Finestone Hayes as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Rejuvi Laboratory, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California to hire Finestone
Hayes LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in dealing with its
creditors; analyze claims; represent the Debtor in matters relevant
to a review of its debts and maximization or disposition of its
assets; assist in the preparation of a plan of reorganization; and
provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Finestone will charge these hourly rates:

     Stephen Finestone             $475
     Jennifer Hayes                $475
     Ryan Witthans                 $300  
     Contract Attorneys        $350 - $375

The Debtor has agreed to pay the firm a retainer in the sum of
$35,000.

Neither the firm nor any of its members and employees have
connection with the Debtor and its creditors, according to court
filings.

Finestone can be reached through:

     Stephen D. Finestone, Esq.
     Jennifer C. Hayes, Esq.
     Finestone Hayes LLP
     456 Montgomery Street, 20th Floor
     San Francisco, CA 94104
     Tel: (415) 421-2624
     Fax: (415) 398-2820
     E-mail: sfinestone@fhlawllp.com

                   About Rejuvi Laboratory Inc.

Founded in 1988 by Dr. Wade Cheng, Rejuvi Laboratory, Inc. --
http://www.rejuvilab.com-- is an integrated cosmetic laboratory
with ongoing research, development and production capability.

Rejuvi Laboratory sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 18-31069) on Sept. 27,
2018.  In the petition signed by Wei Cheng, president, the Debtor
disclosed $2,870,211 in assets and $1,357,213 in liabilities.  

Judge Dennis Montali presides over the case.


RENTPATH INC: Bank Debt Trades at 13% Off
-----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which RentPath Inc.
[ex-Primedia Inc.] is a borrower traded in the secondary market at
87.50 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September
28, 2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 2.76 percentage points from
the previous week. RentPath Incorporated pays 475 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $492 million facility. The bank
loan matures on December 11, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'B2' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of
the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated
loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week
ended Friday, September 28.


ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE: Seeks Access to Cash Collateral Thru Dec. 30
--------------------------------------------------------------
Royal Automotive Company and Royal Real Estate, LLC, request the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to
authorize them to use cash collateral.

The Debtor proposes to use cash collateral in accordance with lines
7-14 of the Wind-Down Budget for the period from Oct. 1 through
Dec. 30, 2018, to wit:

          7. Frontier T-1 Line                $1,575
          8. Accounting System               $45,193
         10. Storage                          $2,260
         11. Brinkster Email Host Site           $40
         13. Fees-Bank Accounts                 $875
         14. Miscellaneous Expenses           $1,731

On the commencement of the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases, Royal
Automotive Company owned and operated a Subaru franchise dealership
at 1901 Patrick Street Plaza in Charleston, West Virginia, and
Royal Real Estate, LLC, owned and leased to Royal Automotive the
premises on which Royal Automotive operated the dealership.

Pursuant to the Court's Order, the Debtors sold the dealership and
substantially all their related properties and assets to Dutch
Miller Subaru, Inc. on June 14, 2018.  In accordance with the
Court's further Order, the Debtors effectively paid all their
secured, first-priority debt to United Bank, subject to an
agreement between United Bank and the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation to hold the Debtors' payment of $57,800 due United Bank
pending the resolution of issues between those two creditors.

Immediately following the sale and the payments to United Bank and
other authorized expenditures relating thereto, the Debtors were
left with roughly $2.5 million in cash, all of which the Debtors
believe is subject to the potentially competing liens and security
interests asserted by United Bank (to the extent of its $57,800 in
unpaid prepetition attorneys' fees), Subaru Acceptance Corporation,
Great American Financial,  the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, and the Internal Revenue Service.

United Bank, Subaru Acceptance Corporation, Great American
Financial, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, and the
Internal Revenue Service may each have competing interests in the
cash collateral.

With the sale of their assets behind them, the Debtors immediately
turned to winding down their businesses and the development of a
Chapter 11 plan.  In connection therewith, the Debtors continue
actively to pursue a standard termination of Royal Automotive's
pension plan as a means for satisfying the entirety Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation's secured claim as the Debtors' necessary
first step in both winding down their businesses and developing a
Chapter 11 plan.

Although the precise parameters of standard termination remain
unclear, the Debtors understand that the costs of a standard
termination would be substantially less than the amount of the
fully secured, now effectively first-priority claim Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation would have against the Debtors in the event of
a PBGC-initiated or distress termination.  The Debtors also expect
that a standard termination will eliminate most, if not all, of the
IRS's asserted secured claim for penalties relating to the pension
plan's chronic underfunding as well.

The Debtors believe that these actions would redound to the benefit
of their remaining secured and potentially unsecured creditors.
For United Bank as to its remaining secured claim and Subaru
Acceptance, the Debtors' actions may eliminate the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation's competing and potentially senior liens, thus
ensuring that proceeds are freed up to satisfy their secured claims
(if and to the extent established and allowed).  For the IRS to the
extent of its remaining secured claim, if any, the Debtors' actions
help to ensure, at least to the extent possible, the availability
of sale proceeds to go toward the satisfaction of its claim.

Although no assurances can be made and depending on a number of
factors that are not yet subject to complete visibility (the extent
of the proceeds remaining after termination of the pension plan and
the extent of the secured claims against the remaining sale
proceeds), the Debtors believe that their actions might free up
sufficient proceeds to confirm a Chapter 11 plan and potentially
provide for limited distributions to unsecured creditors. Thus, to
accomplish those goals, the Debtors require the continued use of
the Cash Collateral.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb18-20218-281.pdf

A copy of the Budget is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvsb18-20218-281-bgt.pdf

                  About Royal Automotive Company

Royal Automotive Company is dealer for new and used cars in
Charleston, West Virginia.  Royal Real Estate LLC is engaged in
activities related to real estate.  

Royal Automotive Company and Royal Real Estate sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Lead
Case No. 18-20218) on May 2, 2018. In the petitions signed by Kelly
Smith, president and CEO, the Debtors estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  

Judge Frank W. Volk is the case judge.

Marc R. Weintraub, Esq., Kevin W. Barrett, Esq., and J. Zak
Ritchie, Esq., at Bailey & Glasser LLP serve as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel; and Suttle & Stalnaker, PLLC, as its
accountant.

John P. Fitzgerald, III, Acting United States Trustee for Region 4,
appoints Lucy L. Thomson, as the Consumer Privacy Ombudsman in the
bankruptcy cases pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 332 and the Court's
order entered on May 21, 2018.


ROYAL AUTOMOTIVE: Selling Shares of Stock in Three Companies
------------------------------------------------------------
Royal Automotive Co. and affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of West Virginia to authorize the sale of
shares of stock in three companies, namely MetLife, Inc.,
Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and The Hanover Insurance Group Inc.

On the commencement of the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases, Royal owned
and operated a Subaru franchise dealership at 1901 Patrick Street
Plaza in Charleston, West Virginia, and Royal Real Estate, LLC
owned and leased to Royal the premises on which Royal operated the
dealership.  Pursuant to the Court's Order of June 13, 2018, the
Debtors sold the dealership and substantially all their related
properties and assets to Dutch Miller Subaru, Inc. on June 14,
2018.

In accordance with the Court's further Order of June 13, 2018, the
Debtors effectively paid all their secured, first-priority debt to
United Bank, subject to an agreement between United Bank and the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. to hold the Debtors' payment of
$57,800 for prepetition attorneys' fees due United Bank pending the
resolution of issues between those two creditors.

Immediately following the Dutch Miller sale and the payments to
United Bank and other authorized expenditures relating thereto, the
Debtors were left with roughly $2.5 million in cash.  With the sale
of their principal assets behind them, the Debtors immediately
turned to winding down their businesses and the development of a
Chapter 11 plan(s).

In winding down Royal's business, Royal management discovered that
Royal owns limited investments in the stock of three companies:

     (a) 98 shares of stock of MetLife, Inc., which had a per share
price of $46.50 and an aggregate value of $4,557.49 as of Sept. 14,
2018;

     (b) 8 shares of stock of Brighthouse Financial, Inc., which
had a per share price of $41.37 and an aggregate value of $330.96
as of Sept. 14, 2018; and

     (c) 180 shares of stock of The Hanover Insurance Group Inc.,
which had a per share price of $119.90 and an aggregate value of
$21,582 as of Sept. 14, 2018.

Royal management does not know how Royal came into ownership of
these shares, the acquisition of which appears to date back many
years.  

The Debtors believe that one or more parties may assert a security
interest or lien in the shares, although the Debtors believe that
significant issues may arise relating to the question of whether
any such party holds a perfected security interest or lien in the
shares.  Nevertheless, having liquidated its principal assets,
Royal wishes to sell these additional assets for which established
public markets exist and hold the net proceeds thereof for
distribution in connection with the Debtors' cases.

By the Motion, Royal asks authority to sell the shares of stock
free and clear of liens, claims, and encumbrances, and to hold the
net proceeds thereof subject to the liens and security interests,
if any, therein, pending further order of the Court.

                  About Royal Automotive Company

Royal Automotive Company is dealer for new and used cars in
Charleston, West Virginia.  Royal Real Estate LLC is engaged in
activities related to real estate.  

Royal Automotive Company and Royal Real Estate sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Lead
Case No. 18-20218) on May 2, 2018.  In the petitions signed by
Kelly Smith, president and CEO, the Debtors estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.

Judge Frank W. Volk is the case judge.

Marc R. Weintraub, Esq., Kevin W. Barrett, Esq., and J. Zak
Ritchie, Esq., at Bailey & Glasser LLP serve as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel; and Suttle & Stalnaker, PLLC, as its
accountant.

John P. Fitzgerald, III, Acting United States Trustee for Region 4,
appoints Lucy L. Thomson, as the Consumer Privacy Ombudsman in the
bankruptcy cases pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 332 and the Court's
order entered on May 21, 2018.


S&E HOLDINGS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: S&E Holdings, Inc.
        22350 Route 522
        Beaver Springs, PA 17812

Business Description: S&E Holdings, Inc., is a privately held
                      company engaged in the manufacturing of wood

                      products.  The company previously sought
                      bankruptcy protection on Oct. 12, 2017
                      (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-04250).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 11, 2018

Case No.: 18-04320

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Pennsylvania (Harrisburg)

Judge: Hon. Henry W. Van Eck

Debtor's Counsel: Lawrence G. Frank, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF LAWRENCE G. FRANK
                  100 Aspen Drive
                  Dillsburg, PA 17019
                  Tel: 717 234-7455
                  Fax: 717 432-9065
                  E-mail: lawrencegfrank@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $500,000 to $1 million

The petition was signed by Ernest L. Knepp, Jr., president.

The Debtor failed to include in the petition a list of its 20
largest unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb18-04320.pdf


S.A.M. GROUP: Taps Newmark Moses as Listing Agent
-------------------------------------------------
S.A.M. Group LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Arkansas to hire a listing agent.

The Debtor proposes to employ Newmark Moses Tucker Partners in
connection with the sale or lease of its real estate.

Newmark will charge a 6% commission if the property is sold or, if
there is a co-broker, a 3% commission.  Meanwhile, the firm will
charge a maximum of 6% of the gross value of a lease if such is
obtained with no co-broker or 5% if there is a co-broker.

J. Fletcher Hanson, an agent employed with Newmark, disclosed in a
court filing that the firm and its agents are "disinterested" as
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     J. Fletcher Hanson  
     Newmark Moses Tucker Partners
     200 River Market Avenue, Suite 501
     Little Rock, AR 72201
     Phone: 501.376.6555
     Email: fhanson@newmarkmtp.com
     Email: sburkhead@newmarkmtp.com

                        About S.A.M. Group

S.A.M. Group LLC is a privately-held company engaged in activities
related to real estate.  S.A.M. Group sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Ark. Case No.
18-15169) on Sept. 24, 2018.  In the petition signed by CEO Sam
McFadin, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  Judge Phyllis M. Jones
presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped the Bond Law Office as
its legal counsel.


SAMMY ELJAMAL: Order Directing Ch. 11 Trustee Appointment Affirmed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant Sammy Eljamal in the case captioned SAMMY ELJAMAL,
Appellant, v. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE; NY FUEL
HOLDINGS, LLC; METRO NY DEALER STATIONS, LLC; NY DEALER STATIONS
LLC; and NY FUEL DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, Appellees, Case No. 17-CV-7870
(KMK) (S.D.N.Y.) appeals from the bankruptcy court's "Order
Directing the Appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee," dated June 6,
2017. More specifically, Debtor appeals on the issue of whether the
bankruptcy court abused its discretion when it granted the motion
of the United States Trustee to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee.
District Judge Kenneth M. Karas affirms the judgment of the
bankruptcy court.

The bankruptcy court's conclusion that appointment of a Chapter 11
trustee was warranted under 11 U.S.C. section 1104(a)(2) was based
on the following: (1) the high level of acrimony between the
Parties; (2) the failure of the Parties to move the case forward in
a timely manner; (3) the ability of the Parties to file avoidance
actions within the applicable statute of limitations; and (4) the
bankruptcy court's determination that the benefits of appointing a
trustee outweighed the costs.

Debtor contends that the level of acrimony in the present case is
no greater than what is to be expected from standard litigation
proceedings. Debtor also contends that the bankruptcy court abused
its discretion because appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee was
unnecessary given the circumstances, as the remaining disputes had
already been litigated, any blockage preventing the case from
moving forward had been cleared, and, thus, there was no need for a
trustee to expedite the process.  According to Debtor, the
bankruptcy court's appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee "penalized
the Debtor for the misconduct of his adversaries," namely the
Committee, was unfair to the Debtor, and thus constituted an abuse
of discretion.

Debtor also argues that the level of acrimony in the present case
is due primarily to the conduct of former employee Brent Coscia and
the Committee. Even assuming that much of the blame for the
acrimony between the Parties rests with the actions of Coscia and
the Committee, that does not change the fact that, "such acrimony .
. . seriously delayed resolution of the case." And, there is plenty
of evidence in the record supporting the conclusion that Debtor
bore some of the responsibility for the high level of acrimony in
this case. Thus, the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion
in appointing a Chapter 11 trustee based in part on the contentious
relationship between the Parties because "[t]he level of acrimony
found to exist in this case certainly makes the appointment of a
trustee in the best interests of the [P]arties and the estate."

Even if the Court adopted Debtor's view that the actions of the
Committee were the true cause of the delay, the third and final
mediation was conducted after the allegedly deceptive actions of
the Committee were known, indicating there were still issues
"preventing the [c]ase from moving forward." Thus, the bankruptcy
court could reasonably find that the appointment of a trustee was
necessary at this stage of the proceedings in order to streamline
resolution of the case.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated Sept. 28, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2yfE9Na from Leagle.com.

Sammy Eljamal, Debtor, represented by Anne Julia Penachio, Penachio
Malera, L.L.P.

Sammy Eljamal, Appellant, represented by Anne Julia Penachio,
Penachio Malera, L.L.P. & Joseph Patrick Garland , Law Office of
Joseph P. Garland.

Office of the United States Trustee, Appellee, represented by
Andrew D. Velez-Rivera, Office of The United States Trustee & Paul
Kenan Schwartzberg , Office of The United States Trustee.

NY Fuel Holdings, LLC, Metro NY Dealer Stations, LLC, NY Dealer
Stations, LLC & NY Fuel Distributors, LLC, Appellees, represented
by Michael Luskin, Luskin, Stern & Elsler LLP & Stephan Edward
Hornung, Luskin, Stern & Elser LLP.

Stephen S. Gray, Trustee, represented by Albert Togut --
altogut@TeamTogut.com -- Togut, Segal & Segal LLP.

The Chapter 11 bankruptcy case is In re: Sammy Eljamal (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-22872).


SAMUEL WYLY: Selling Two TDRs for $235K Each
--------------------------------------------
Samuel Evans Wyly asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas to authorize the private sale of two Transferable
Development Rights and the associated Irrevocable Certificates of
Transferable Development Rights issued by the Community Development
Department of Pitkin County, Colorado ("TDRs") that are owned by
Rosemary's Circle R Ranch East, LLC and Rosemary's Circle R Ranch
West, LLC, for an estimated cash sale price of $235,000 each.

The TDRs are freely transferable by deed and endorsement.  They are
not real property attached to any specifically described real
property in Pitkin County.  The Debtor is the sole manager of the
Ranch LLCs.  The membership interests of the Ranch LLCs are solely
owned by Rosemary's Circle R Ranch Management Trust.  The Debtor
and Rosemary Circle R Ranch Ltd. were the initial grantors of the
Management Trust.  The Debtor has a 1% (approximately) interest5 --
and Rosemary Ranch Ltd. a 99% interest -- in the Management Trust.


The trustees of the Management Trust are Lisa Wyly Graham and Kelly
Wyly O'Donovan.  The Ranch LLCs acquired the TDRs in 2005 with
funding provided by Rosemary Ranch Limited through the Management
Trust.  The first TDR was acquired for approximately $181,650 and
the second TDR was acquired shortly thereafter for approximately
$195,000.

The proceeds from the sale of the TDRs will be held in a segregated
interest-bearing account at a federally insured financial
institution in Dallas, Texas, subject to the rights and claims of
all parties, specifically including the IRS, to be distributed in
accordance with a further order of the Court or a confirmed plan
proposed by the Debtor.

By the Motion, the Debtor asks an order authorizing the Debtor, as
sole manager of the LLCs, to close a private sale of the TDRs at an
estimated sale price of $235,000 each to be deposited as provided
above without further Court approval.  

In the course of an unrelated TDR transaction, Lennie Oates was
able to locate a third party buyer for the TDRs, which buyer is
unrelated to the Wyly family or any Wyly entity.  In his extensive
experience, Mr. Oates believes the purchase price secured for the
TDRs is fair and reasonable, and well within the range of current
pricing for TDRs in the Pitkin County marketplace.  Moreover, Mr.
Oates believes closing on the sale in a timely manner will secure
the maximum value for the TDRs likely to be achieved in the
foreseeable future.  

The Debtor shares these beliefs.  It has consulted the Committee,
the Department of Justice, and the U.S. Trustee, previewing the
Motion and asking their support for the relief requested.  The
Committee, the DOJ, and the UST have indicated they do not intend
to object to the relief sought.

The Debtor has been steadily working to maximize and monetize
assets for the benefit of the holders of allowed claims.  The
private sale of the TDRs is an important component of that process
and the Debtor believes the sale is in the best interest of his
estate and his creditors.  As evidenced by the affidavit of Lennie
Oates, the Debtor is confident that the TDRs will be sold well
within the range of best available offers that can be consummated
in the near term on the open market.

The Debtor asks that the order approving the sale of the TDRs be
effective immediately by waiving the 14-day stay under Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(h).

                        About Sam Wyly

Samuel Wyly is a lifelong entrepreneur and author.  His first book,
1,000 Dollars & An Idea, is a biography that tells his story of
creating and building companies, including University Computing,
Michaels Arts & Crafts, Sterling Software, and Bonanza Steakhouse.

His second book, Texas Got It Right!, co-authored with his son,
Andrew, was gifted to roughly 450,000 students and teachers,
thought leaders, and readers, and continues to be a best-seller in
its Amazon category.

In September 2014, a federal judge ordered Mr. Wyly and the estate
of his deceased brother to pay more than $300 million in sanctions
after they were found guilty of committing civil fraud to hide
stock sales and nab millions of dollars in profits.

Samuel Wyly filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 14-35043) on Oct. 19, 2014, weeks after a judge
ordered him to pay several hundred million dollars in a civil fraud
case.

On Oct. 23, 2014, Dee Wyly filed her voluntary petition for relief
under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, thereby initiating her
bankruptcy case.

On Nov. 10, 2014, the Court ordered "the procedural consolidation
and joint administration of the chapter 11 cases of Samuel E. Wyly
and Caroline D. Wyly [under] Case No. 14-35043."

On Dec. 2, 2014, the Court entered an order appointing an official
committee of unsecured creditors in Sam's Case.

On Nov. 23, 2016, the Court converted Dee's Case to a case under
chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and terminated the joint
administration of the bankruptcy cases.  Robert Yaquinto, Jr., was
subsequently appointed as the chapter 7 trustee to administer Dee
Wyly's bankruptcy estate.

On March 3, 2015, the Court appointed Dallas Auction Gallery as the
Debtor's Broker and Auctioneer.


SARAI SERVICES: Taps Sparkman Shepard as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Sarai Services Group, Inc., and its affiliates filed applications
seeking approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Alabama to hire legal counsel in connection with their
Chapter 11 cases.

In their applications, Sarai Services, SSGWWJV LLC, Sarai
Investment Corporation and CM Holdings, Inc., propose to employ
Sparkman, Shepard & Morris, P.C. to assist in the preparation of a
plan of reorganization; represent them in adversary proceedings;
and provide other legal services related to their bankruptcy
cases.

Sparkman will charge these hourly rates for the services of its
attorneys:

     Tazewell Shepard        $375
     Kevin Morris            $350
     Tazewell Shepard IV     $300

The firm's attorneys are "disinterested" as defined in section 101
(13) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

Sparkman can be reached through:

     Tazewell Taylor Shepard, IV, Esq.
     Sparkman, Shepard & Morris, P.C.
     303 Williams Avenue, Suite 1411
     Huntsville, AL 35801
     Tel: 256-512-9924
     Fax: 256-512-9837
     Email: ty@ssmattorneys.com

                  About Sarai Services Group

Sarai Services Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, is a
privately-held company in Huntsville, Alabama, that specializes in
logistics, program management and information technology.

Sarai Services Group, SSGWWJV LLC, Sarai Investment Corporation and
CM Holdings, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case Nos. 18-82948 to 18-82951)
on Oct. 3, 2018.

In the petitions signed by CEO James Mitchell, chief executive
officer, each Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Clifton R. Jessup Jr. presides over the cases.


SCIENCE APPLICATIONS: Moody's Rates Sec. Bank Credit Facility Ba2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has assigned a Ba2 rating to the planned
senior secured bank credit facility of Science Applications
International Corp. SAIC's existing debt ratings, the speculative
grade liquidity rating of SGL-2, and the negative rating outlook
are unaffected.

Proceeds will refinance the debt of SAIC and of Engility
Corporation, as SAIC is in the process of acquiring Engility's
parent. That merger is anticipated to be completed before year end.
Moody's will withdraw all ratings of Engility, once Engility's
outstanding debts have been repaid.

RATINGS RATIONALE

SAIC's ratings, including the Ba2 corporate family rating, reflect
broad agency coverage and diversity of service revenue that will
follow the combination, with about 23,000 employees and 69% of them
holding a security clearance. Beyond the US Department of Defense,
SAIC's contracts will span multiple agencies of the intelligence
community, space and federal civilian agencies.

Acquiring Engility will give SAIC a greater degree of revenue from
direct labor rather than from materials and subcontractors, which
should enhance margin. Further, cost synergies could by the end of
2021 (three years after the merger), result in an EBITDA margin as
high as 10%, versus 8% recently. SAIC will increase the portion of
revenues from cost-based contracts, which makes achieving
cost-synergies also beneficial for price competitiveness purposes.


A favorable US defense budgetary environment expected near term
affords latitude to emphasize quality of the business integration
which will be important to achieving revenue synergies later, such
as bidding for larger, more complex service projects.

The negative rating outlook recognizes limited room for execution
error over the initial 12 to 18 months following the merger.
Pro-forma beginning financial leverage at 4x is high compared to
other peers at the same rating level, and SAIC faces a significant
integration project ahead.

Further, the stock for stock acquisition, may encourage SAIC to
ultimately prepay very little debt, with bolt-on M&A and alternate
free cash flow uses possible. The planned bank facility's
amortization schedule requires only $75 million across the first
two years.

The negative outlook also factors the potential upcoming
termination of the US Marine Corps' amphibious assault vehicle
upgrade program, on which SAIC is lead contractor, following the
recently issued 90-day stop work order. Moody's viewed the program
as an important opportunity for SAIC to build performance
credentials with a vehicle program of significance, which has been
a strategic objective. In Moody's view the vehicle platform
integration business would give SAIC stronger backlog with
potential for access to longer term revenue from defense
procurement accounts, rather than the typically shorter-term
operations/maintenance accounts available to most of the service
contractors.

SAIC's only acquisition since becoming an independent company
occurred with the 2015 purchase of Scitor. Scitor was a
long-established and successful, intelligence agency services
specialist, but one-third the size of Engility, and became an
operating segment of SAIC after the acquisition. In contrast,
Engility became an independent company only in 2012 as a spin-off
from L-3 Technologies. Engility revenues and market share
contracted since its own 2015 transformational merger with TASC, a
merger which roughly doubled revenue. Instead of keeping Engility
separate, SAIC will immediately integrate Engility's broad
portfolio across its three operating segments.

As Moody's expects US defense service outlay growth of mid-single
digit percentage near-term, stabilization of the rating outlook
will be sensitive to at least a low single digit percent revenue
growth for SAIC, with a similar backlog gain.

Moody's will monitor SAIC's integration spending rate, the
likelihood of de-leveraging to mid-3x within the first year and
achieving annual run rate free cash flow, after one-time costs, of
$200 million. As one-time costs subside, the annual free cash flow
run rate of the combined entity could exceed $300 million by the
end of the second year.

The ratings could be upgraded with consistently higher revenues and
evidence of ability to prime larger, more prominent contracts.
EBITDA margin above 10%, free cash flow to debt in the high teen
percentage range (e.g. over $400 million per annum), and sustained
good liquidity would be important elements in any potential
upgrade.

The rating could be downgraded with expectations of debt to EBITDA
above 4x, significant negative contract developments, weakened
liquidity or indication of disruptions in the merger integration,
or inability to stabilize and then growth Engility's revenue on a
profitable basis.

The Ba2 rating assigned to the planned senior secured bank credit
facility, on par with the CFR, reflects preponderance of secured
debt within the liability structure.

Assignments:

Issuer: Science Applications International Corp

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned Ba2 (LGD3)

Science Applications International Corporation is a provider of
technical, engineering and enterprise information technology
services primarily to the U.S. government, including the Department
of Defense and federal civilian agencies. The company was spunoff
from Leidos Holdings, Inc. on September 27, 2013. Annual revenues,
pro forma for the pending acquisition of Engility Holdings Corp,
are about $6.4 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Aerospace and
Defense Industry published in March 2018.


SCIENCE APPLICATIONS: S&P Rates New $2.5BB Secured Loans 'BB'
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to Science Applications International Corp.'s
(SAIC) proposed senior secured credit facility, which comprises a
$400 million revolver, a $1.068 billion term loan A due 2023, and a
$1.05 billion term loan B due 2025, and placed the issue-level
ratings on CreditWatch with positive implications. The '3' recovery
rating indicates our expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded
estimate: 50%) recovery in a default scenario. The CreditWatch
positive placement reflects that S&P expects to raise its
issue-level rating on the facility to 'BB+' when SAIC closes its
acquisition of Engility Holdings.

All of S&P's other ratings on the company remain unchanged.

SAIC plans to use the proceeds from the proposed term loan B to
refinance its existing debt and the proceeds from the proposed term
loan A to refinance Engility's debt, upon the close of the pending
acquisition, and pay related fees and expenses. If for any reason
the acquisition does not close, SAIC will only draw $618 million on
the term loan A and use the proceeds to pay down a similar amount
on the term loan B. Under this scenario, the revolver's commitment
would only be $200 million.

The positive CreditWatch on S&P's issuer credit rating on SAIC
reflects that we will likely raise the rating to 'BB+' when the
acquisition closes. The likely upgrade will reflect the increase in
the company's scale and customer and program diversity following
its combination with Engility. These changes, along with an
improvement in its margins, should more than offset the temporary
deterioration in its credit measures due to the additional debt
related to the acquisition.

ISSUE RATINGS--RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors

S&P has completed its recovery analysis and assigned a '3' recovery
rating to the company's proposed $400 million revolver, $1.068
billion term loan A due 2023, and $1.05 billion term loan B due
2025.

S&P has valued the company on a going-concern basis using a 5.0x
multiple of its projected emergence EBITDA. Other key assumptions
at default include: LIBOR of 2.5% and the revolver is 85% drawn.

Simulated default assumptions

-- Year of default: 2023
-- EBITDA at emergence: $245 million
-- EBITDA multiple: 5x

Simplified waterfall

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% admin. costs): $1.16 billion
-- Valuation split (obligors/nonobligors): 100%/0%
-- Value available for first-lien claims: $1.16 billion
-- Secured first-lien debt claims: $2.13 billion
    --Recovery expectations: 50%-70% (rounded estimate: 50%)

  RATINGS LIST

  Science Applications International Corp.
   Issuer Credit Rating               BB/Watch Pos/--

  New Rating; CreditWatch Action

  Science Applications International Corp.
   Senior Secured
    $400 mil revolver due 2023        BB/Watch Pos
     Recovery Rating                  3(50%)
    $1.068 bil term ln A due 2023     BB/Watch Pos
     Recovery Rating                  3(50%)
    $1.05 bil term ln B due 2025      BB/Watch Pos
     Recovery Rating                  3(50%)


SEADRILL LIMITED: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
--------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Seadrill Limited is
a borrower traded in the secondary market at 94.63
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 0.99 percentage points from
the previous week. Seadrill Limited pays 600 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $1.10 billion facility. The bank loan
matures on February 21, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa2' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'CCC+' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, September 28.


SEARS HOLDINGS: Big Banks Pushed for Chapter 7 Liquidation
----------------------------------------------------------
A group of lenders that includes Bank of America, Citigroup and
Wells Fargo had pushed Sears Holdings (NASDAQ:SHLD) hard to
liquidate assets under a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, rather than
reorganize under a Chapter 11 filing, The Wall Street Journal
reported last week.

The clock is ticking on Sears with $134 million in loan payments
due today, October 15, which the company retailer previously warned
it may not meet.

Company officials have met with advisers from M-III Partners LLC
and added noted bankruptcy expert Alan Carr to its board.

According to latest reports, Sears Holding, however, is now close
to reaching a deal with lenders over a bankruptcy plan that would
close about 150 stores but keep 300 locations open through the
Holiday season.  As part of the bankruptcy deal, the retailer's
lenders, which include Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co.
(NYSE: WFC), and Citigroup Inc., along with CEO Eddie Lampert would
provide emergency financing of up to $500 million.

Sears is expected to file for chapter 11 bankruptcy today,
according to reports.

                      About Sears Holdings

Based in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, Sears Holdings Corporation
(NASDAQ: SHLD) -- http://www.searsholdings.com/-- is an integrated
retailer focused on seamlessly connecting the digital and physical
shopping experiences to serve its members.  Sears Holdings is home
to Shop Your Way, a social shopping platform offering members
rewards for shopping at Sears and Kmart, as well as with other
retail partners across categories important to them.  The Company
operates through its subsidiaries, including Sears, Roebuck and Co.
and Kmart Corporation, with full-line and specialty retail stores
across the United States.

Sears Holdings reported a net loss of $383 million on $16.70
billion of total revenues for the year ended Feb. 3, 2018, compared
to a net loss of $2.22 billion on $22.13 billion of total revenues
for the year ended Jan. 28, 2017.  

As of Aug. 4, 2018, Sears Holdings had $6.93 billion in total
assets, $11.33 billion in total liabilities and a total deficit of
$4.40 billion.


SEARS HOLDINGS: Hires M-III Partners for Bankruptcy Filing
----------------------------------------------------------
Sears Holdings Corp has hired M-III Partners LLC to prepare a
bankruptcy filing that could come ahead of the Oct. 15 debt
payment, the Wall street Journal reported, citing people familiar
with the situation.

M-III Partners, a boutique advisory firm, has been working on the
potential filing in the past few weeks and Sears continues to
discuss other options and could still avert an in-court
restructuring, the WSJ said, citing sources.

As widely reported, Sears Holdings Corp. planning to file for
bankruptcy Monday as it faces a critical $134 million of debt that
is maturing on Oct. 15.

Sears and Kmart merged to form Sears Holdings in 2005 when they had
3,500 US stores between them.  Unable to keep up with online stores
and other brick-and-mortar retailers, a long series of store
closings has left it with 866 Sears and Kmart stores as of Aug. 4.
Sears employs about 89,000 people, compared to 246,000 five years
ago.

Sears began as a mail ordering catalog company in 1887 and became
the world's largest retailer in the 1960s.  At its peak, Sears was
present in almost every big mall across the U.S., and sold
everything from toys and auto parts to mail-order homes.

                      About Sears Holdings

Based in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, Sears Holdings Corporation
(NASDAQ: SHLD) -- http://www.searsholdings.com/-- is an integrated
retailer focused on seamlessly connecting the digital and physical
shopping experiences to serve its members.  Sears Holdings is home
to Shop Your Way, a social shopping platform offering members
rewards for shopping at Sears and Kmart, as well as with other
retail partners across categories important to them.  The Company
operates through its subsidiaries, including Sears, Roebuck and Co.
and Kmart Corporation, with full-line and specialty retail stores
across the United States.

Sears Holdings reported a net loss of $383 million on $16.70
billion of total revenues for the year ended Feb. 3, 2018, compared
to a net loss of $2.22 billion on $22.13 billion of total revenues
for the year ended Jan. 28, 2017.  

As of Aug. 4, 2018, Sears Holdings had $6.93 billion in total
assets, $11.33 billion in total liabilities and a total deficit of
$4.40 billion.


SEARS HOLDINGS: Lampert, Banks to Provide Bankruptcy Financing
--------------------------------------------------------------
Sears Holdings, which is facing a $134 million debt payment due
Monday, is planning to file for bankruptcy after midnight in the
East Coast, people familiar with the situation told CNBC.  Sears
has previously said it may not be able to make that payment.

Sears Holdings Corp CEO Eddie Lampert and big banks are expected to
provide one of America's iconic retailers bankruptcy financing to
fund operations while it restructures under Chapter 11, Reuters
reports, citing people familiar with the matter.

Reuters reports that Mr. Lampert, Sears' largest shareholder and
lender, has stepped in to contribute toward a financing package of
between $500 million and $600 million that was close to securing on
Sunday to fund operations during bankruptcy proceedings.

Big banks, including Bank of America Corp, Wells Fargo & Co and
Citigroup Inc, are expected to provide significant portions of the
financing, Reuters' sources added. Mr. Lampert, according to
Reuters, is hoping the deal, combined with a program of
divestments, will give Sears a fighting chance to escape
liquidation ahead of the key holiday shopping season.

According to a report by CNBC's Lauren Hirsch and Lauren Thomas,
people familiar with the matter have said that Sears, as part of
the bankruptcy plan, will immediately close roughly 150 of its
stores.  Sears will aim to stay in operations through the holidays,
during which it will seek a buyer.

CNBC recounts that Lampert's hedge fund, ESL Investments, in August
made a bid to buy the Kenmore appliance brand and home improvement
division, but the deal has not yet been granted approval by the
special committee appointed to oversee it.  The committee has not
formerly rejected Lampert's offer, a person familiar with the
matter said.

Reuters' Richa Naidu and Jessica DiNapoli report that three vendors
told Reuters that the retailer has missed scheduled payments in the
last couple of weeks, and vendors could stop shipments if they are
worried Sears cannot pay, potentially sending the retailer into
freefall.

"We went into business with them with our eyes open and knew this
day would come one day," said Arnold Kamler, chief executive
officer of Parsippany, New Jersey, bike maker Kent International
Inc.  Kamler said he withheld a shipment to Sears after it missed a
regular payment last week for the first time, according to
Reuters.

Sears only had $193 million in cash on hand as of Aug. 4, the end
of its last fiscal quarter.

On October 9, the Hoffman Estates, Illinois-based retailer
announced that Alan J. Carr, Managing Member and CEO of Drivetrain,
LLC, has joined the Company's Board of Directors.

Carr has significant experience as a principal, investor and
advisor leading complex financial restructurings, as well as
serving as a director of reorganized businesses in the U.S. and
Europe. Carr was previously an attorney at Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP and Ravin, Sarasohn, Baumgarten, Fisch & Rosen.

Lampert said, "Alan brings deep experience as a director for
companies that went through complex organizational change. We are
pleased to welcome him to the Board and look forward to the benefit
of his expertise as we work to maximize value for the Company and
its stakeholders."

Sears and Kmart merged to form Sears Holdings in 2005 when they had
3,500 US stores between them.  Unable to keep up with online stores
and other brick-and-mortar retailers, a long series of store
closings has left it with 866 Sears and Kmart stores as of Aug. 4.
Sears employs about 89,000 people, compared to 246,000 five years
ago.

Sears began as a mail ordering catalog company in 1887 and became
the world's largest retailer in the 1960s.  At its peak, Sears was
present in almost every big mall across the U.S., and sold
everything from toys and auto parts to mail-order homes.

                      About Sears Holdings

Based in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, Sears Holdings Corporation
(NASDAQ: SHLD) -- http://www.searsholdings.com/-- is an integrated
retailer focused on seamlessly connecting the digital and physical
shopping experiences to serve its members.  Sears Holdings is home
to Shop Your Way, a social shopping platform offering members
rewards for shopping at Sears and Kmart, as well as with other
retail partners across categories important to them.  The Company
operates through its subsidiaries, including Sears, Roebuck and Co.
and Kmart Corporation, with full-line and specialty retail stores
across the United States.

Sears Holdings reported a net loss of $383 million on $16.70
billion of total revenues for the year ended Feb. 3, 2018, compared
to a net loss of $2.22 billion on $22.13 billion of total revenues
for the year ended Jan. 28, 2017.  

As of Aug. 4, 2018, Sears Holdings had $6.93 billion in total
assets, $11.33 billion in total liabilities and a total deficit of
$4.40 billion.



SEQUA CORP: Fitch Affirms B- Issuer Default Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Sequa Corporation's (Sequa; SQA) Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'B-', senior first lien secured revolver
and term loan at 'B'/'RR3' and senior second lien secured term loan
at 'CCC'/'RR6'. The Rating Outlook is Stable. The ratings cover
approximately $1.4 billion of outstanding debt.

Rating concerns include Sequa's limited financial flexibility,
volatile cash flows, moderate execution risk, recent weakness in
the power market potentially affecting Sequa's joint ventures (JV),
high degree of competition at Chromalloy and the cyclicality of
both the aerospace and construction industries, which contributes
to Sequa's sensitivity to economic downturns. Other key risks to
the rating include continued pressure in the commercial aviation
aftermarket business from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)
and other players (most of which are larger than Chromalloy) and
other trends in the aftermarket business such as 3D printing and
data analytics -- both of which create uncertainty about the future
structure of the business. The company also faces potential
inventory risk, and customer concentration and contract exposure.

Sequa's 'B-' IDR is supported by ongoing cost-cutting and
restructuring initiatives, anticipated financial and operational
improvements at the Chromalloy segment, the Precoat segment's
leading market position and the company's experienced management
team.

Other factors supporting the rating include the technology
incorporated into Chromalloy's products, the support of the main
equity holder, The Carlyle Group, the currently healthy commercial
aviation market, the outlook for rising defense expenditures in the
U.S. and other parts of the world, and large net operating losses
that will shield cash tax payments over the rating horizon. Fitch
also considers the expansion of PMA platforms to be positive, and
likely contribute to the company's organic growth over the next few
years, particularly in aftermarket sales.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Seasonal Liquidity, Volatile Cash Flow: The company's liquidity was
weak at the end of second-quarter 2018, driven primarily by
seasonal working capital outflows in the first half of the year.
However, liquidity improved following the sale and leaseback
transaction early in third-quarter 2018. Fitch also believes the
company will adequately be able to manage seasonal working capital
fluctuations, as they typically result in cash inflows in the
latter half of the year.

Fitch expects the company will generate positive cash from
operations in second-half 2018 and 2018 overall, driven by its
Precoat segment and working capital inflows at Chromalloy. However,
risk remains that further periodic cash outflows could result in a
severe strain in liquidity, and subsequent negative rating action,
if not managed effectively. Fitch anticipates FCF will remain
negative for 2018, due in part to the voluntary pension
contribution during the first half of the year, but will turn
positive in 2019.

Strained Financial Flexibility: Fitch considers Sequa's financial
flexibility to be limited following several periods of negative
cash flow, with many of the company's risks captured within the
'B-' rating. In particular, Fitch believes that the potential loss
of one or more significant contracts, or a cyclical downturn in
either of its main end-markets would further strain SQA's
flexibility. Incremental acquisitions would likely require debt or
equity funding, and extended operating headwinds post-restructuring
may require an additional equity infusion or further
restructuring.

Credit Metrics Improving, Execution Risk Remains: Fitch expects
SQA's leverage (debt/EBITDA) and FFO fixed-charge coverage ratios
will continue to improve over the next few years after a weak 2017.
Fitch believes the company has adequately offset some of the lost
revenue from the KC-10 program since early 2017 with several new
contract wins at Chromalloy. SQA's rating is driven by the
assumption that the company will continue to execute on its
near-term objectives. This includes continuing its cost reduction
plan within its Chromalloy segment, maintaining a leading position
in the coating market, effectively managing liquidity and capex
costs, and realizing benefits from its JVs. Although Fitch believes
the company will be able to manage these goals, there is
uncertainty and risk that the company will not be able execute on
each area.

Leading Position in Coating Market: Fitch considers Precoat's top
market position to be a leading positive driver for Sequa's rating.
SQA generates the majority of its operating cash flow and EBITDA
through Precoat, despite challenging market conditions since the
recession in 2008-2009. An increase in infrastructure spending
could lead to outperforming Fitch's conservative segment
projections of low-single-digit annual top-line growth between 2018
and 2021.

Chromalloy Operations Improved, Challenges Remain: In 2016, the
segment reported improvement for the first time since 2012. The
segment improved further in 2017 as the company's management
completed numerous actions to improve both sales and operating
margins, positioning Chromalloy well for growth over the next
several years.

However, several challenges remain. The loss of the prime KC-10
contract was a material headwind in the first half of 2018,
particularly after executing on lower-than-expected volumes of
maintenance and support on the program, work that the company will
retain going forward. Fitch believes potential revenue growth could
also be affected in 2019 and 2020 by weakness in the power market
and challenges at the company's JV partners. Fitch does not expect
the company will be required to contribute a material amount of
incremental cash to the JV's going forward, but future sales and
EBITDA growth may be affected.

These headwinds have been somewhat offset by new contracts that the
company has entered into to provide an array of aftermarket
services and maintenance. Fitch views these contracts as a
positive, as they also address some challenges of competition in
the commercial aerospace markets. However, the company must
continue to execute on its objectives and manage associated working
capital effectively.

Strong Management Team: Beginning in June 2015, Sequa commenced a
major overhaul of its top executives and key personnel, replacing
previous management with highly qualified individuals. Fitch
believes the new management in place adds credibility to the
company's ability to cut costs and return to profitability. Many of
the new employees have experience in turnaround situations and the
aerospace industry.

Potential Refinancing Risk: Fitch recognizes that refinancing risk
may increase materially as the 2021 maturity date for the company's
first lien secured term loan nears. While Fitch views this risk as
modest in the near term, there are many factors that could make
refinancing challenging, including a downturn or tightening in the
U.S. debt market or weakening of the company's credit profile.

Other Risks and Factors: Other risks incorporated into the rating
include further weakness in the power market, which could severely
affect the company's revenue, EBITDA, and future growth prospects
associated with JV programs; continued pressure in the commercial
aviation aftermarket business from OEMs and other players, most of
which are larger than Chromalloy; other trends in the aftermarket
business such as 3D printing and data analytics, both of which
create uncertainty about the future structure of the business;
customer concentration and contract exposure; and the cyclicality
of both the aerospace and construction industries, which
contributes to Sequa's sensitivity to economic downturns.

Other factors supporting the recommended rating include the
technology incorporated into Chromalloy's products; recent new
contract awards; the support of the main equity holder (Carlyle
Group); the currently healthy commercial aviation market; the
outlook for rising defense expenditures in the U.S. and other parts
of the world; and large net operating losses that will shield tax
payments.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

SQA's credit metrics are in line with Fitch's expectations for a
'B-' rating. Leverage is in line with similarly rated peers, cash
flow generation weaker and profitability slightly stronger. Fitch
expects the company's metrics will improve marginally over the next
few years as the company continues to make progress on its planned
cost cutting initiatives at Chromalloy and executes on recent
contract wins.

Fitch considers Precoat's top market position and technological
capabilities to be a leading positive driver for Sequa's rating.
However, Chromalloy faces pressure in the commercial aviation
aftermarket business from OEMs and other like-sized or larger
players, despite recent contract wins. Fitch considers Chromalloy's
technology to be supportive of the rating; however, future
innovation by competitors could severely affect the SQA's credit
profile.

Parent subsidiary linkage, country ceiling considerations, or
operating environment restraints were not in effect for these
ratings.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within the Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- The company experiences modest, single-digit top-line growth
in 2019 and 2020;

  -- EBITDA margins remain relatively steady at Precoat over the
rating horizon, but decline at Chromalloy in 2018 before rebounding
in 2019;

  -- The company continues to execute on its planned efficiency and
cost cutting initiatives through 2019;

  -- The company begins to generate modestly positive FCF in 2019;

  -- Capex remains between 3.5% and 4.0% of sales, annually,
through 2020;

  -- Commercial aviation market remains healthy over the next three
to four years;

  -- The company maintains a leading market position in the coating
market;

  -- No top or bottom line impact from new JVs before late 2019;

  -- Sequa pays minimal cash taxes for the next several years;

  -- Company refinances its first lien term loan in 2020.

Recovery Rationale

The recovery analysis assumes that SQA would be considered a going
concern in bankruptcy and that the company would be reorganized
rather than liquidated. A 10% administrative claim is assumed in
the recovery analysis.

Fitch's recovery assumptions are based on the company's modest
contract exposure, the high degree of competition and pressure in
the commercial aftermarket business, particularly from OEMs, as
well as cyclicality in the company's main end-markets. Fitch also
considered Sequa's competitive advantage at Precoat and the high
degree of technology incorporated into Chromalloy's products.

Fitch assumes SQA will receive a going-concern recovery multiple of
5.0x EBITDA under this scenario. Fifty-six percent of industrial
and manufacturing defaulters had exit multiples in the range of
5.0x to 8.0x according to the "Industrial, Manufacturing, Aerospace
and Defense Bankruptcy Enterprise Values and Creditor Recoveries"
report published by Fitch in July 2018. Within the report, Fitch
observed that more than 90% of the bankruptcy cases analyzed were
resolved as a going concern. Most of the defaulters observed in the
I&M and A&D sectors were smaller in scale, had less diversified
product lines or customer bases and were operating with leveraged
capital structures.

In Fitch's recovery analysis, potential default is assumedto come
from a combination of one or more of: an economic downturn leading
to material contract cancellations in the construction or aviation
markets; mismanagement of seasonal working capital flows creating a
severe strain on liquidity and limiting the company's ability to
cover cash interest costs or repay term loan amortization;
heightened competition, particularly by OEM's, or potential
technological advancement by competitors at Chromalloy leads to
significant contract cancellations; or the inability to refinance
SQA's outstanding obligations upon maturity.

Fitch generally assumes a fully drawn revolver in its recovery
analyses since credit revolvers are tapped as companies are under
distress. As a result, Fitch has assumed full draw of SQA's $135
million revolver in its analysis.

The 'B' rating and Recovery Rating of 'RR3' on the first lien term
loan and revolver are based on Fitch's recovery analysis under a
going concern scenario, which indicates recovery prospects for the
term loan in the range of 51% to 70%. The 'CCC' rating and 'RR6' on
the second lien term loan indicate recovery prospects for the term
loan in the range of 0% to 10%.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- Gross leverage declines below 5.5x for a sustained period;

  -- FFO fixed-charge coverage increases above 2.0x for a sustained
period;

  -- The company consistently generates positive FCF over a
sustained period.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- FFO fixed-charge coverage ratio falls and remains below 1.25x
for a sustained period;

  -- Gross leverage remains above 7.5x over a sustained basis;

  -- The company loses one or more significant contracts;

  -- Company does not generate adequate seasonally adjusted cash to
support operations, weakening the company's liquidity;

  -- Cash restructuring costs significantly impair the company's
FCF generation.

LIQUIDITY

Fitch views SQA's liquidity to be adequate following the sale and
leaseback transaction involving certain Chromalloy facilities
completed early in third-quarter 2018. However, the company has
minimal headroom, and it needs to continue executing on its plan in
order to improve cash generation and avoid pressuring its cash
position. Fitch projects the company will generate positive cash
from working capital flows in the second half of 2018 after
seasonal outflows in the first half of the year, which should
further improve the liquidity position. Fitch would consider a
negative rating action if the company did not meet or exceed
expectations, as this would reflect a weakened liquidity position.

Fitch considers SQA's debt structure to be relatively manageable,
but the company could experience some refinancing risk as the term
loan maturity date nears. The company has a $135 million senior 1st
lien secured revolver due 2021, a $920 million term loan B maturing
in 2021, and a $350 million senior 2nd lien secured term loan
maturing in 2022. The company has approximately $575 million of
preferred shares, which are majority owned by the company's
sponsor, Carlyle, and therefore receive 100% equity credit under
Fitch's criteria. The company also has $75 million outstanding
under the Receivables Purchase Agreement with no additional
availability as of June 30, 2018.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Sequa Corporation

  -- Long-term IDR at 'B-';

  -- Senior first lien secured revolving credit facility at
'B'/'RR3';

  -- Senior first lien secured term loan at 'B'/'RR3';

  -- Senior second lien secured term loan at 'CCC'/'RR6'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


SERTA SIMMONS: Bank Debt Trades at 10% Off
------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Serta Simmons
Bedding LLC is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 89.72
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 2.12 percentage points from
the previous week. Serta Simmons pays 350 basis points above LIBOR
to borrow under the $1.95 billion facility. The bank loan matures
on November 8, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, September 28.


SFR GROUP: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off
-------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which SFR Group SA
[ex-Numericable SAS] is a borrower traded in the secondary market
at 97.78 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday,
September 28, 2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson
Reuters MTM Pricing. This represents an increase of 2.93 percentage
points from the previous week. SFR Group pays 275 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $1.418 billion facility. The bank
loan matures on June 22, 2025. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of
the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated
loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week
ended Friday, September 28.



SHAHEEN SHAHEEN: Kelley Buying West Long Branch Property for $5.25M
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Shaheen H. Shaheen asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Jersey to authorize the sale of the real property located at
310 Norwood Avenue, West Long Branch, New Jersey to Kelley Builders
and Developers, L.L.C. for $5.25 million, subject to higher and
better offers.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 16, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

The Debtor owns the Property.  On Sept. 20, 2018, the Debtor
entered into the Contract for the Sale of the Subject Property to
the Buyer.

Because of the Debtor's interest in the Subject Property, it is
necessary to apply for an Order authorizing conveyance of the
Subject Property free and clear of liens.

The aforesaid property is encumbered by these two mortgages:

     a. Mortgage dated March 19, 1999 between the Debtor and
Washington Mutual Bank, FA in the principal amount of $603,750,
recorded on 5/1/1999 in the Monmouth County Clerk's Office in
Mortgage Book 6776, Page 308.  Said Mortgage was assigned to
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and is the subject of Foreclosure
Proceeding Docket Number F-037059-1.  The Proof of Claim filed on
behalf of Chase shows an amount due of $1,094,466.

     b. Mortgage dated Jan. 28, 2011 between the Debtor and First
Platinum Capital Corp. in the principal amount of $1.4 million,
recorded on 2/7/2011 in the Monmouth County Clerk's Office in
Mortgage Book OR-8876, Page 9864.  Said Mortgage was assigned to
the following four parties, each with a 25% interest: David Stern,
Illya Trincher, P.T.N.A. and John Hanson.

In addition to the mortgage liens set forth, these are also
judgments docketed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, which may
be liens against the Debtor'sinterest in the Subject Property:

     a. Home Properties Rivers Edge, LLC, Judgment No.
J-103091-2012, $468,992;

     b. Michael J. Avallone, Judgment No. J-268930-2012, $286,774;

     c. State of New Jersey, Division of Taxation, Transfer
Inheritance Tax Bureau, Judgment No. DJ-3 10756-2007, $309,452;

     d. John F. Bracaglia, Trustee for Nelson Engineering, Inc.,
Judgment No. CB- 035639-1997 (against the Shaheen Agency),
$11,690;

     e. Keystone Envirosciences Group Inc., Judgment No.
J-176837-2014, $26,919; and

     f. John Clark, Judgment No. J-091977-2018, $172,805.

None of the judgment creditors have levied upon the Subject
Property that is the subject of the proposed sale.  All of the
judgments contained in the judgment search were docketed
pre-petition.  The Purchaser is a purchaser for value.  The
proffered purchase price for the Subject Property is $5.25 million,
which is a fair offer.  The Subject Property has been marketed for
sale for several years and the Purchaser's offer was procured
through marketing by Gerard Scala, ReMax Elite, a licensed New
Jersey real estate broker.  An application for the retention of Mr.
Scala will be filed concurrent to the Motion.

At the closing, the pPrchaser will pay $3.25 million of the $5.25
million total purchase price.  The proceeds of the sale payable to
the Debtor at closing ($3.25 million) will be utilized to pay
ordinary closing costs, including, but not limited to, any
applicable broker's commission as allowed by the Court, realty
transfer fees, adjustments, attorney's fees and the mortgages.

The balance of sale proceeds remaining after payment of these costs
at closing (if any) will be deposited into trust with The Kelly
Firm, P.C., with valid liens, claims and encumbrances to attach to
the net proceeds of sale.  The funds will thereafter be disbursed
by the Escrow Agent in accordance with any Plan of Reorganization
approved by the Bankruptcy Court or any other order subsequently
entered by the Court approving further disbursement of the
proceeds.  The sale contract is subject to Court approval, and
higher and better offers.

The Purcahser:

          KELLY BUlLDERS AND DEVELOPERS, L.L.C.
          14 Bridgewaters Drive
          Oceanport, NJ 07757

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Andrew J. Kelly, Esq.
          THE KELLY FIRM, P.C.
          1011 Highway 71, Suite 200
          Spring Lake, NJ 07762
          Telephone: (732) 449-0525
          E-mail: akelly@kbtlaw.com

Shaheen H. Shaheen sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 16-33768) on Nov. 27, 2017.  The Debtor tapped Andrew J. Kelly,
Esq., at The Kelly Firm, P.C., as counsel.


SHARING ECONOMY: Receives Noncompliance Notice from Nasdaq
----------------------------------------------------------
Sharing Economy International Inc. received a staff deficiency
notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market on Oct. 8, 2018, informing the
Company that it has failed to comply with Nasdaq's shareholder
approval requirements set forth in Listing Rule 5635(c).  During
the period from May 11, 2017 to date, the Company entered into
approximately one hundred arrangements resulting in the issuance or
potential issuance of more than three million shares to officers,
directors, employees, and consultants.  The Company did not receive
shareholder approval for the Equity Compensation Grants, and the
shares were not issued from a shareholder approval equity
compensation plan.  The Company is continuing to review its
internal records relating to prior issuances, and as information
becomes available regarding any shares issued in similar
circumstances, the Company will notify Nasdaq.

The Company intends to submit its plan to regain compliance no
later than Oct. 26, 2018.  If the plan is accepted, Nasdaq can
grant an extension of up to one hundred eighty calendar days from
Oct. 8, 2018 to evidence compliance.  The Company believes that it
has otherwise been compliant with its filing obligations pursuant
to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including
making all appropriate disclosures to the marketplace.  The Company
said it is currently doing everything possible to cure its
deficiencies regarding the Rule.

                    About Sharing Economy

Headquartered in Jiangsu Province, China, Sharing Economy
International Inc. -- http://www.seii.com/-- through its
affiliated companies, designs, manufactures and distributes a line
of proprietary high and low temperature dyeing and finishing
machinery to the textile industry.  The Company's latest business
initiatives are focused on targeting the technology and global
sharing economy markets, by developing online platforms and rental
business partnerships that will drive the global development of
sharing through economical rental business models.   

Throughout 2017, the Company made significant changes in the
overall direction of the Company.  Given the headwinds affecting
its manufacturing business, the Company is targeting high growth
opportunities and has established new business divisions to focus
on the development of sharing economy platforms and related rental
businesses within the company.  These initiatives are still in an
early stage.  The Company did not generate significant revenues
from its sharing economy business initiatives in 2017.

RBSM LLP's audit opinion included in the company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 contains a going concern
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company had a loss from
continuing operations for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 and expects
continuing future losses, and has stated that substantial doubt
exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
RBSM has served as the Company's auditor since 2012.

Sharing Economy incurred a net loss of $12.92 million in 2017 and a
net loss of $11.67 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, Sharing
Economy had $74.97 million in total assets, $9.83 million in total
liabilities and $65.13 million in total stockholders' equity.


SHO HOLDING I: Moody's Cuts CFR to Caa2 & Alters Outlook to Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded SHO Holding I Corporation's
ratings, including its Corporate Family Rating to Caa2 from Caa1,
Probability of Default Rating to Caa2-PD from Caa1-PD, and its
first lien senior secured credit facilities to Caa1 from B3. The
rating outlook was changed to stable from negative.

The downgrade reflects Shoes for Crews' weak operating performance,
very high leverage and weak overall liquidity due to modest free
cash flow and tight covenant cushion.  While debt maturities do
not begin until October 2021, substantial earnings improvement and
or debt reduction is needed to improve leverage to a refinanceable
level which in its view is challenging. Thus, the probability of
default, including a distressed exchange, is high over the next
couple of years. Its capital structure is currently unsustainable,
with lease-adjusted Debt/EBITDAR remaining above 10 times.

Shoes for Crews' has been taking action to reignite profit growth
and free cash flow. While showing some modest progress, these
initiatives will take longer than expected and not likely to
materially improve the company's credit profile. Given tight
covenant cushion, there is little room for any negative variance in
operating performance or cash flow over the near term.

Moody's took the following rating actions:

Downgrades:

Issuer: SHO Holding I Corporation

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to Caa2-PD from Caa1-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to Caa2 from Caa1

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Downgraded to Caa1 (LGD3)
from B3 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Term Loan, Downgraded to Caa1 (LGD3) from B3 (LGD3)


Outlook Actions:

Issuer: SHO Holding I Corporation

Outlook, Changed To Stable from Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

Shoes for Crews' Caa2 Corporate Family Rating reflects its high
debt burden stemming primarily from the 2015 acquisition of a
controlling stake of the company by CCMP Capital Advisors, LLC, the
2016 acquisitions of SureGrip Footwear and Mozo, and subsequent
weak operating performance reflected in reduced profitability and
weak free cash flow generation. The rating also reflects the
company's very small scale and narrow product focus on
slip-resistant footwear for work environments, with a primary focus
in the foodservice industry. Positive rating consideration is given
to the recurring purchase of technical footwear caused by normal
wear-and-tear, the company's long-standing customer relationships
with low concentration, and established payroll deduction programs
within its customer base that creates a barrier to entry due to the
embedded technology within customers' human resource systems.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will show modest improvement in operating performance and cash flow
over the next year and so, while covenants are tight, the company
has a reasonable chance to maintain access to its revolver.

Ratings could be downgraded if operating performance or liquidity
deteriorates leading to an increased probability of default.

A ratings upgrade would require material improvement in liquidity
and financial leverage, through both profit growth and debt
reduction, leading to a sustainable capital structure that can be
refinanced well ahead of debt maturities beginning in 2021. An
upgrade would also require the company to maintain at least an
adequate liquidity profile, with positive free cash flow generation
and ample covenant cushion.

SHO Holding I Corporation, which does business as "Shoes for
Crews," designs, markets and manufactures slip-resistant footwear
in the United States and certain European countries. Revenue for
the twelve month period ended June 2018 exceeded $200 million. The
company is headquartered in West Palm Beach, FL.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Apparel
Companies published in December 2017.


SILVERADO STAGES: Seeks to Hire Sonoran Capital, Appoint CRO
------------------------------------------------------------
Silverado Stages, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Arizona to hire Sonoran Capital Advisors,
LLC, and appoint the firm's managing director Matthew Foster as
chief restructuring officer.

Mr. Foster and his firm will assist in developing and executing a
plan to evaluate the operations and financial functions of
Silverado Stages and its affiliates; provide recommendations with
respect to the execution and oversight of those functional areas;
help plan and implement the Debtors' restructuring; and provide
other services related to their Chapter 11 cases.

Sonoran will be paid a monthly advisory fee of $35,000, with the
first payment paid on Oct. 5, and all subsequent payments due on
the first business day of each month thereafter.  

Nineveh Holdings LLC, a third-party, paid the initial $35,000 fee.
The company also provided the firm with a $25,000 retainer.

Sonoran charges these hourly rates:

     Managing Directors     $425
     Senior Consultants     $350
     Associates             $295
     Analysts               $195

Mr. Foster and his firm are "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

Sonoran can be reached through:

     Matthew Foster
     Sonoran Capital Advisors, LLC
     1733 N Greenfield Road, Suite 101
     Mesa, AZ 85234
     Phone: (602) 405-5380

                    About Silverado Stages

Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, Silverado Stages, Inc. --
https://silveradostages.com/ -- with 10 locations on the West
Coast, is a federally licensed motor carrier and operates as a
Public Stage under California DOT authority.  The company is
additionally certified as a U.S. Department of Defense motor
carrier to provide transportation for the military and by the CHP
as a School Pupil Activities Bus (SPAB) operator.  

Silverado Stages was founded in 1987 and has had the most diverse
background in passenger operations.  It operates a diverse fleet of
over 300 passenger vehicles, over 60 of which are ADA compliant.
It currently operates from terminals in San Luis Obispo,
Sacramento, Santa Barbara, Torrance, San Diego, Reno, and Las
Vegas.  

Silverado Stages and seven of its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case Nos.
18-12203, 18-12205, 18-12207, 18-12209, 18-12210, 18-12213,
18-12215 and 18-12218) on Oct. 5, 2018.

In the petitions signed by James Galusha, chairman, Silverado
Stages estimated  $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.


SILVERADO STAGES: Taps Allen Barnes as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Silverado Stages, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Arizona to hire Allen Barnes & Jones, PLC
as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the company and its affiliates regarding their
duties under the Bankruptcy Code; represent them in negotiation
with their creditors; and provide other legal services related to
their Chapter 11 cases.

Allen Barnes will charge these hourly rates:

     Thomas Allen, Member                   $405
     Hilary Barnes, Member                  $405
     Michael Jones, Member                  $355
     Philip Giles, Associate                $305
     David Nelson, Associate                $225
     Legal Assistants/Law Clerks        $115 - $135

Prior to the petition date, Allen Barnes received an initial
retainer in the sum of $50,000 from the Debtors.  On Oct. 5, 2018,
the firm received from Nineveh Holdings LLC, a third party, the sum
of $150,000 to be held in trust for the Debtors to secure the
firm's fees and costs.

Allen Barnes does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors
and their bankruptcy estates, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Michael A. Jones, Esq.
     Philip J. Giles, Esq.
     David B. Nelson, Esq.
     Allen Barnes & Jones, PLC
     1850 N. Central Ave., Suite 1150
     Phoenix, AZ 85004
     Office: (602) 256-6000
     Fax: (602) 252-4712
     E-mail: mjones@allenbarneslaw.com  
     E-mail: pgiles@allenbarneslaw.com  
     E-mail: dnelson@allenbarneslaw.com

                    About Silverado Stages

Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, Silverado Stages, Inc. --
https://silveradostages.com/ -- with 10 locations on the West
Coast, is a federally licensed motor carrier and operates as a
Public Stage under California DOT authority.  The company is
additionally certified as a U.S. Department of Defense motor
carrier to provide transportation for the military and by the CHP
as a School Pupil Activities Bus (SPAB) operator.  

Silverado Stages was founded in 1987 and has had the most diverse
background in passenger operations.  It operates a diverse fleet of
over 300 passenger vehicles, over 60 of which are ADA compliant.
It currently operates from terminals in San Luis Obispo,
Sacramento, Santa Barbara, Torrance, San Diego, Reno, and Las
Vegas.  

Silverado Stages and seven of its affiliates sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case Nos.
18-12203, 18-12205, 18-12207, 18-12209, 18-12210, 18-12213,
18-12215 and 18-12218) on Oct. 5, 2018.

In the petitions signed by James Galusha, chairman, Silverado
Stages estimated  $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in liabilities as of the bankruptcy filing.


SKILLSOFT CORP: $185MM Bank Debt Trades at 14% Off
--------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Skillsoft
Corporation is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 85.63
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 1.15 percentage points from
the previous week. Skillsoft Corporation pays 825 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $185 million facility. The bank
loan matures on April 28, 2022. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'CCC-' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, September 28.


SKILLSOFT CORP: $465MM Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
-------------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Skillsoft
Corporation is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 94.92
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents a decrease of 1.48 percentage points from
the previous week. Skillsoft Corporation pays 475 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $465 million facility. The bank
loan matures on April 28, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'CCC+' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, September 28.


SOUTHCROSS HOLDINGS: S&P Puts 'CCC' ICR to CreditWatch Positive
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings on Southcross Holdings
Borrower L.P., including the 'CCC' issuer credit rating, on
CreditWatch with positive implications. The '3' recovery rating on
the company's senior secured debt remains unchanged, indicating
S&P's expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 60%)
recovery in the event of a payment default.

S&P said, "The CreditWatch positive placement reflects our view
that the proposed asset sale will improve Holdings' credit quality
and liquidity because we expect the company to use the net proceeds
to fully repay its outstanding debt. Our ratings on SXE are not
affected by this announcement because we do not expect the
transaction to benefit the partnership." The Robstown fractionator
has 64,000 barrels per day of NGL capacity. EPIC will assume all of
the NGL purchase and sale agreements associated with the
fractionator, including those with SXE. The purchase also includes
a 57-mile pipeline that allows the fractionator to receive NGLs
from various third-party pipelines. As of June 30, 2018, Holdings
had approximately $138 million of outstanding debt.

S&P plans to resolve the CreditWatch positive listing on Holdings
in November when the proposed asset sale closes. At that time, S&P
expects to raise our issuer credit rating on the company by at
least one notch if all of its outstanding debt is repaid.



SOUTHEASTERN HOSPITALITY: Case Summary & 20 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Southeastern Hospitality, LLC
           dba The Mercury
        675 Ponce De Leon Ave, Suite 215
        Atlanta, GA 30308

Business Description: The Mercury is a cocktail-focused, classic
                      American eatery located in Ponce City
                      Market, Atlanta, Georgia.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 12, 2018

Case No.: 18-67291

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Atlanta)

Debtor's Counsel: William Anderson Rountree, Esq.
                  ROUNTREE & LEITMAN, LLC
                  2800 North Druid Hills Road
                  Building B, Suite 100
                  Atlanta, GA 30329
                  Tel: (404) 584-1244
                  Fax: (404) 581-5038
                  E-mail: wrountree@randllaw.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Earl E. Cloud III, owner.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb18-67291.pdf


STONE PLACE: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
---------------------------------------------------
Stone Place International LLC seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to use cash
collateral to fund its operating expenses and the costs of
administering this Chapter 11 case in accordance with a proposed
budget.

The Debtor intends to use cash collateral generally and for
purposes which include the following: (a) care, maintenance, and
preservation of the Debtors' assets; (b) payment of necessary,
repairs, suppliers, utilities, and other business expenses; (c)
other payments necessary to sustain continued business operations;
and (d) costs of administration in this Chapter 11 case.

The Debtor believes that these creditors may assert a valid and
perfected security interest in the cash collateral pursuant to
certain loan agreements and mortgages in favor of these creditors,
namely: CapCall, LLC, Orange Advance, LLC, and WMI (Amax Leasing
Source).

The significant provisions of the proposed Interim Order are as
follows:

      (a) Interim Relief. The Order will be granted on an interim
basis, pending a final hearing on the Motion.

      (b) Budget. The Debtor' use of cash collateral will be
materially consistent with the Budget, subject to a 10% variance on
a cumulative basis. The Budget initially covers the month of
October, 2018 -- March, 2019; and

      (c) Adequate Protection. The following will constitute good
and sufficient adequate protection to the Lenders for the Debtor'
use of the Cash Collateral:

          (i) Adequate Protection Liens. The Debtor will provide
the Lenders with replacement liens identical in extent, validity
and priority as such liens existed on the Petition Date; and

         (ii) Reporting Requirements. The Debtor will provide on a
monthly basis profit and loss statements on a cash basis to counsel
for each of the Lenders.

      (d) Event of Default: It will be an event of default if the
Debtor exceed the Variance, provided for in the Interim Order;
provided, however, in the event of a default, the Debtors’
authority to use Cash Collateral will continue until the Lenders
obtain an order by appropriate motion after notice and a hearing
requiring the Debtors to cease using Cash Collateral.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb18-04000-62.pdf

                     About Stone Place Int'l

Stone Place International filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-04000) on May 16, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Christiano Camargo, owner, the Debtor estimated
less than $50,000 in assets and less than $500,000 in liabilities
as of the bankruptcy filing.  John P. Sherman, Esq., at Gallardo
Law Office, is the Debtor's counsel.  No official committee of
unsecured creditors has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


STONEMOR PARTNERS: Extends Interim Strategic Executive's Term
-------------------------------------------------------------
StoneMor GP LLC, the general partner of StoneMor Partners L.P., and
Leo J. Pound modified the terms of their agreement dated July 26,
2018 pursuant to which Mr. Pound serves as interim strategic
executive of StoneMor GP by extending the term of his service in
that capacity through Oct. 31, 2018.  StoneMor GP also delegated to
Joseph M. Redling, its president and chief executive officer, the
authority to extend such term for one additional month.  During
that additional period of service as interim strategic executive,
Mr. Pound will continue to receive a monthly fee of $50,000.  Mr.
Pound will defer his return to the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of StoneMor GP until his service as interim strategic
executive ceases.

              Matters Pertaining to Lawrence Miller

On Oct. 12, 2018, the Partnership and Lawrence Miller entered into
a letter agreement that resolved the number of units that vested
upon Mr. Miller's retirement as president and chief executive
officer in May 2017 pursuant to awards made under the Partnership's
2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan.  The parties agreed that a total of
22,644 time-based units and 63,836 performance-based units vested
under those awards in accordance with the terms of the Separation
Agreement dated March 27, 2017 between Mr. Miller and StoneMor GP.
The parties also agreed that a total of $340,751 will be paid to
Mr. Miller pursuant to distribution equivalent rights with respect
to those units.

In connection with entering into the Agreement, Mr. Miller resigned
as a director of StoneMor GP.  The Partnership will pay Mr. Miller
the distribution equivalent rights within five business days, and
will issue the vested units within five business days after it has
filed all reports it is required to file under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The Agreement also included a
customary release by Mr. Miller of any further claims with respect
to the Plan, including the referenced awards, and any right to
appoint a "Founder Director" under the terms of StoneMor GP's
Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, as
amended.

                   About StoneMor Partners

StoneMor Partners L.P., headquartered in Trevose, Pennsylvania --
http://www.stonemor.com/-- is an owner and operator of cemeteries
and funeral homes in the United States, with 316 cemeteries and 91
funeral homes in 27 states and Puerto Rico.  StoneMor's cemetery
products and services, which are sold on both a pre-need (before
death) and at-need (at death) basis, include: burial lots, lawn and
mausoleum crypts, burial vaults, caskets, memorials, and all
services which provide for the installation of this merchandise.

Stonemor reported a net loss of $75.15 million on $338.2 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net
loss of $30.48 million on $326.2 million of total revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of Dec. 31, 2017, Stonemor had $1.75
billion in total assets, $1.66 billion in total liabilities and
$91.69 million in total partners' capital.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on July 10, 2018, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Stonemor Partners L.P.'s Corporate Family rating to
'Caa1' from 'B3'.  The Caa1 CFR reflects Moody's expectation for
breakeven to modestly negative free cash flow (before
distributions), ongoing delays in filing financial statements and
Stonemor's significant reliance on its revolving credit facility
for liquidity in 2018.

In April 2018, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC+' corporate
credit rating on StoneMor Partners L.P.  S&P said, "The rating
affirmation reflects our expectation that the company can generate
operating cash flow of approximately $25 million in 2018 to support
operating needs for at least another year."


SUNPLAY POOLS: Taps Fox Law Corp. as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
SunPlay Pools and Spas Superstore, Inc., seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah to hire The Fox Law
Corporation as its lead bankruptcy counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors regarding the resolution
and payment of claims; assist the Debtor in any proposed
disposition of its assets; review claims to be pursued on behalf of
its estate; assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan; and
provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Fox Law will charge these hourly rates:

     Steven Fox     $475
     Associates     $250
     Paralegals     $125

The firm received a pre-bankruptcy retainer of $63,283, which
included the filing fee of $1,717.

Steven Fox, Esq., principal of Fox Law, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Steven R. Fox, Esq.
     The Fox Law Corporation
     17835 Ventura Boulevard Suite 306
     Encino, CA 91316
     Tel: 818-774-3545
     Fax: 818-774-3707
     Email: srfox@foxlaw.com

                   About SunPlay Pools and Spas
                          Superstore Inc.

Founded in 1967, SunPlay Pools and Spas Superstore, Inc. --
https://www.sunplay.com/ -- operates a retail store offering pool
and spa supplies, equipment, chemicals, parts and services.  It has
been transitioning to serve customers everywhere via its online
sales department at Sunplay.com and HotTubWarehouse.com.

SunPlay Pools and Spas Superstore sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 18-27417) on
Oct. 4, 2018.  In the petition signed by John A. Olson, president,
the Debtor disclosed $692,093 in assets and $2,571,463 in
liabilities.  

Judge Joel T. Marker presides over the case.


SUNSET PARTNERS: Trustee May Continue Using Cash Until Dec. 6
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts authorized Lynne Riley, the duly
appointed Chapter 11 trustee of Sunset Partners, Inc. and Chapter 7
trustee of Bema Restaurant Corporation to continue using cash
collateral on the same terms and conditions as previously ordered
through and including December 6, 2018.

A continued hearing will be held on December 6, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-12178-270.pdf

                     About Sunset Partners

Sunset Partners, Inc., is a Massachusetts corporation that owns and
operates two Boston area restaurants: the Sunset Grill & Tap
located at 130 Brighton Avenue, Allston, MA; and, the Sunset
Cantina located at 916 Commonwealth Avenue, Brookline, MA.
Affiliate Bema Restaurant Corporation, d/b/a Patron's, is a
Massachusetts corporation that owns and operates a Boston area
restaurant called Patrons, which is located at 138 Brighton Avenue,
Allston, Massachusetts.

Sunset Partners filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 17-12178) on June 7, 2017, disclosing $1.05
million in total assets and $5.67 million in total liabilities.  

Bema Restaurant Corporation filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 17-12434) on June 29, 2017, disclosing $1.12 million
in assets and $4.45 million in liabilities.  Marc Berkowitz,
president, signed the petitions.  

The cases are jointly administered and assigned to Judge Joan N.
Feeney.

David B. Madoff, Esq., and Steffani Pelton Nicholson, Esq., at
Madoff & Khoury LLP, served as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors;
and  Verdolino & Lowey, P.C., served as the Debtors' accountant.

On Sept. 25, 2017, Lynee F. Riley was appointed as the Chapter 11
trustee to the Debtors.  The Trustee retained Casner & Edwards LLP
as counsel.


SYNTHESIS INDUSTRIAL: Taps Hunter Parker as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Synthesis Industrial Holdings 1 LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada to hire Hunter Parker,
LLC, as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; examine claims of creditors; prosecute claims
asserted by the Debtor; assist in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

Andrew Van Ness, Esq., the attorney at Hunter Parker who will be
handling the case, charges an hourly fee of $350.  Paralegals and
legal assistants charge $200 per hour.

The Debtor paid an initial retainer of $5,000 for the
pre-bankruptcy services provided by the firm in preparation of its
case.  The filing fee of $1,717 was paid by the Debtor's managing
member.

Mr. Van Ness is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

Hunter Parker can be reached through:

     Andrew J. Van Ness, Esq.
     Hunter Parker, LLC
     3815 S Jones Blvd., Suite 1A
     Las Vegas, NV 89103
     Phone: (702) 686-9297
     Email: hunterparkerllc@gmail.com

                  About Synthesis Industrial

Synthesis Industrial Holdings 1 LLC sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-15993) on
Oct. 5, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $1
million.  Judge Mike K. Nakagawa presides over the case.


T & S SUBS: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
T & S Subs, d/b/a Quizno's Store #769, seeks authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri to use
cash collateral in the operation of its business.

The Debtor believes that the only creditor who has a
non-preferential interest in the Debtor's cash collateral is Swift
Capital. Prior to the filing of the bankruptcy, Quick Silver and
Fox Capital seized credit card funds owed to the Debtor.

Since the filing of its petition, the Debtor has remained in
possession of all property of the estate and continues to operate
Debtor's business. At this time, the Debtor has approximately
$2,997, more or less, on deposit at Southwest Missouri Bank.

The Debtor proposes to pay Swift Capital the sum of $750 per month
for the use of cash collateral.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

                http://bankrupt.com/misc/mowb18-30526-8.pdf

Attorneys for T & S Subs:

         Norman E. Rouse, Esq.
         COLLINS, WEBSTER AND ROUSE, P.C.
         5957 E. 20th Street
         Joplin, Missouri 64801
         Phone: (417) 782-2222
         Fax: (417) 782-1003
         E-mail: roberta@cwrcave.com

                        About T & S Subs

T & S Subs, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case
No. 18-30526) on Sept. 17, 2018.  In the petition signed by Robert
T. Aggus, owner, the Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and
$100,001 to $500,000 in liabilities.  Collins, Webster, & Rouse,
PC, led by Norman E. Rouse, serves as counsel to the Debtor.



T CAT ENTERPRISE: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Until Oct. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Jack B. Schmetterer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois has signed an agreed second interim
order authorizing T CAT Enterprise, Inc.'s use of cash collateral
through and including October 31, 2018.

A further hearing to consider the Cash Collateral Motion and entry
of final cash collateral order will be held on Oct. 30, 2018 at
10:30 a.m.

The Debtor may use the cash collateral to pay those items
delineated in the cash collateral budget with a variance from
actual-to-projected weekly disbursements not to exceed 10% on
cumulative basis. The approved budget provides total projected
expenses of approximately $231,898 covering the period commencing
September 9, 2018 through and including October 31, 2018.

Associated Bank, N.A. asserts secured claims against some or all of
the Debtor's assets, including Debtor's cash and accounts
receivable.

Associated Bank and any other secured creditor are granted
replacement liens upon and security interests in the Debtor's
post-petition cash and accounts receivable in the same priority as
Associated Bank's and any other secured creditor's existing
prepetition liens (to the extent valid), and in no event to exceed
the type, kind, priority and amount, if any, of their security
interests which existed on the Petition Date.

The Debtor proposes to initially make monthly adequate protection
payments to Associated Bank in the amount of $6,000 by October 27,
2018, which consists of principal and interest on the outstanding
balance.

A full-text copy of the Agreed Second Interim Order is available
at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb18-22736-39.pdf

                     About T CAT Enterprise

T Cat Enterprise, Inc. -- http://www.tcatinc.com/-- is a
family-owned and operated construction company specializing in
excavation, railroad clean up, and snow plowing services in the
tri-state area.  In addition, the Company also offers hauling
services, demolition services, and pavers and asphalt repairs.

T Cat Enterprise, Inc., based in Franklin Park, IL, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-22736) on Aug. 13, 2018.
In the petition signed by James R. Trumbull, president, the Debtor
estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Jack B. Schmetterer presides over the case.
Joseph E. Cohen, Esq., and Gina B. Krol, Esq., at Cohen & Krol,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.


TEBERIO PROPERTIES: Taps Doran & Doran as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Teberio Properties, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to hire Doran &
Doran, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in negotiation with its
creditors; assist in the preparation and implementation of a
bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

John Doran, Esq., and Lisa Doran, Esq., the attorneys who will be
handling the case, will charge $300 per hour and $285 per hour,
respectively.

Doran & Doran was paid $1,425 for its pre-bankruptcy services.  The
firm also received a retainer of $8,575, plus $1,717 for the filing
fee.

Ms. Doran disclosed in a court filing that her firm does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Lisa M. Doran, Esq.
     Doran & Doran, P.C.
     69 Public Square, Suite 700
     Wilkes-Barre, PA 18701
     Phone: 570-823-9111
     Fax: 570-829-3222
     Email: ldoran@dorananddoran.com

                   About Teberio Properties

Teberio Properties, LLC, is a privately-held operator of
nonresidential buildings in Mountain Top, Pennsylvania.

Teberio Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 18-04214) on Oct. 4,
2018.  In the petition signed by Linda Teberio, managing member,
the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge John J. Thomas presides
over the case.


TEMPEST GROUP: Nov. 2 Disclosure Statement Hearing Set
------------------------------------------------------
The Bankruptcy Court will convene a hearing to consider the
adequacy of the amended disclosure statement explaining Tempest
Group, LLC's Chapter 11 Plan on November 2, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.
Objections to the disclosure statement are due October 26.

As reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, the Debtor amended
its Chapter 11 plan to modify the treatment of Class 3 claim of FB
Acquisitions Property XVII LLC.

FB Acquisition -- formerly Navy Portfolio, LLC, formerly Home
Savings and Loan Company -- is the holder of a first mortgage on
rental property located at 414, 416-418 New York Avenue, Rochester,
PA 15074 and 415-417 New York Avenue, Rochester, PA 15074.
According to the Plan, FB Acquisition's secured claim will be
reduced to the value of the collateral.  The Debtor will
restructure the modified secured claim and the mortgage to a new
30-year fixed rate mortgage at 5.0% (the previous plan proposing
4.5%) payable over 30 years with a balloon payment after five
years.  If there are no defaults after four years, the five-year
balloon will be extended to six years.  The Debtor projects that FB
Acquisitions will be secured to the extent of $135,000.  This
property is subject to a real estate tax lien of $5,561.68 which
has priority over the first mortgage. The balance of the claim will
be an allowed unsecured claim under Class 9.

A copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available from
PacerMonitor.com at https://tinyurl.com/yd8tc8fm at no charge.

                        About Tempest Group

Tempest Group, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-24204) on November 10,
2016.  In the petition signed by Joann Jenkins, manager, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $1 million.  

Judge Carlota M. Bohm presides over the case.  The Debtor hired
Calaiaro Valencik as its legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.

The Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan on March 19, 2018.



THOMAS OVATION: Case Summary & 10 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Thomas Ovation, LLC
        45 Ansley Drive
        Newnan, GA 30263

Business Description: Thomas Ovation, LLC is a real estate
                      developer based in Newnan, Georgia.
                      The Company previously sought bankruptcy
                      protection on May 17, 2017 (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
                      Case No. 17-11046).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 11, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Georgia (Newnan)

Case No.: 18-12127

Debtor's Counsel: David L. Bury, Jr., Esq.
                  STONE & BAXTER, LLP
                  Fickling & Co. Building, Suite 800
                  577 Mulberry Street
                  Macon, GA 31201
                  Tel: 478-750-9898
                  Fax: 478-750-9899
                  E-mail: dbury@stoneandbaxter.com

Estimated Assets: $50 million to $100 million

Estimated Liabilities: $50 million to $100 million

The petition was signed by Stanley E. Thomas, manager.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb18-12127.pdf

List of Debtor's 10 Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Ashley T. Roberts                    Commissions         $85,000

B.J. Yuill                             Leasing            $2,500
                                      Consultant

Fourth Quarter                           Loan        $21,985,490
Properties 100, LLC
45 Ansley Drive
Newnan, GA 30263

GRE Kappa, LLC                         Guaranty      $10,200,000
c/o Gamma Real
Estate, LLC
101 Park Avenue,
Suite 2602
New York, NY 10178

Platform Real Estate                    Leasing           $5,000
                                       Consultant

Sherrard Roe Voigt                       Legal            $1,268
& Harbeson PLC                          Services

SWA Group                              Engineering       $10,986
                                        Services

Tennessee Department of Revenue       Franchise Tax     $212,531


Wakefield Beasley                     Architectural     $243,803
                                        Services

Williamson County Trustee              Property Tax     $321,559
P.O. Box 1365
Franklin, TN 37065


THOR INDUSTRIES: Moody's Assings Ba2 CFR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba2 Corporate Family Rating
and a Ba2-PD Probability of Default Rating to Thor Industries, Inc.
Concurrently, Moody's assigned a Ba2 rating to the company's
proposed $2.3 billion senior secured term loan B. Proceeds from the
term loan, along with equity proceeds and borrowings under an ABL
facility will be used to fund the acquisition of Erwin Hymer , one
of the leading designers and manufacturers of recreational vehicles
in Europe. The rating outlook is stable. This is a first time
rating for Thor Industries, Inc.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba2 CFR balances Thor's significant scale, strong balance
sheet, and the company's leading market positions against the
cyclical and competitive nature of the RV industry that is highly
vulnerable to economic downturns. Moody's recognizes Thor's strong
competitive standing in North America (50% share of towables and
42% share of motorized RVs), its well-known brand names, and the
company's broad RV offering touching multiple price points and
segments. The fully priced acquisition of Hymer (purchased for an
almost 11x EBITDA multiple) solidifies Thor's position as the
leading global RV manufacturer while improving geographic diversity
(23% of pro forma sales in Europe) and providing opportunities for
improved operational performance through the benefits of scale. A
strong economy and generally favorable demand fundamentals add
further support and seem likely to underpin continued demand for
RVs into 2019.

Nevertheless, Moody's has concerns that the largely debt-financed
acquisition of Hymer represents a shift to a more aggressive
financial policy (Thor was previously run with minimal debt) in an
industry that is prone to significant volatility in production
levels and earnings. Pro forma Moody's adjusted Debt-to-EBITDA of
around 2.6x is moderate but still exposes the company to elevated
near-term financial risk in an intensely cyclical market that is
now in its ninth successive year of growth. An inflationary cost
environment involving a tight labor market, rising input costs and
the, as of yet uncertain, impact of tariffs on RV costs act as
further tempering considerations.

The stable outlook reflects Thor's strong competitive standing and
its expectation that Thor will use most of its near-term free cash
flow to pay down debt and reduce leverage to more sustainable
levels.

The SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating denotes its
expectations of a very good liquidity profile over the next 12
months. Moody's anticipates free cash flow of at least $300 million
during fiscal 2019, which translates to a healthy FCF-to-Debt ratio
of more than 10%. On-going cash balances are expected to be
maintained around $250 million and amortization on term debt is
modest at $23 million per annum. External liquidity is provided by
a $750 million asset-backed revolver (with up to $200 million drawn
at close) that expires in October 2023. Over the coming quarters,
Moody's anticipates that Thor will use free cash generation to pay
down substantially most of these revolver borrowings although
Moody's expects the company to maintain its dividend payout of
around $100 million per annum. The ABL facility is expected to
contain a springing minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0x
that comes into effect if availability is less than the greater of
$60 million or 10% of the maximum available credit.

Any upward rating action would be predicated on expectations of a
highly conservative financial policy along with a demonstrated
ability to consistently generate strong free cash flow. A more
diversified product offering that reduced Thor's reliance on highly
cyclical RV markets would also be supportive of upward rating
pressure. The ratings could be upgraded if Moody's adjusted
Debt-to-EBITDA was expected to remain below 1.0x while maintaining
EBITDA margins around 10%. Given Thor's vulnerability to highly
cyclical end-markets, Moody's would expect the company to maintain
credit metrics that are stronger than levels typically associated
with companies at the same rating level.

The ratings could be downgraded if Moody's adjusted Debt-to-EBITDA
was expected to remain above 3.5x. Any near-term debt-financed
acquisitions or share-holder distributions would likely cause
downward rating pressure. A weakening liquidity profile involving
reduced free cash generation or a reliance on external sources of
financing could result in a ratings downgrade. A deterioration in
operating performance such that EBITDA margins were expected to
remain below 8%, or the loss of a major dealer, or expectations of
a sustained erosion of market share could also result in downward
rating action.

The following is a summary of the rating actions:

Issuer: Thor Industries, Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, assigned Ba2

Probability of Default Rating, assigned Ba2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity, assigned SGL-1

$2.3 billion senior secured term loan due 2025, assigned Ba2 (LGD4)


Outlook, assigned Stable

Thor Industries, Inc., headquartered in Elkhart, Indiana, is a
leading designer and manufacturer of recreational vehicles
including travel trailers, fifth wheels, specialty trailers,
motorhomes, caravans, and campervans. The company primarily
operates in North America and Europe and sells its products under
brands such as Airstream, Heartland, Jayco, Thor Motorcoach, Hymer,
Niesmann Bischoff and Roadtrek. Pro forma for the acquisition of
Erwin Hymer, the combined companies will generate about $11.2
billion in annual revenues.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Manufacturing Companies published in June 2017.


THOR INDUSTRIES: S&P Gives BB Issuer Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB' issuer credit rating to
Elkhart, Ind.-based Thor Industries Inc. The rating outlook is
stable.

S&P said, "We also assigned our 'BB' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to the proposed $2.28 billion senior secured term
loan B due in 2025, which consists of a dollar-denominated tranche
of $1.78 billion and a euro-denominated tranche up to the
equivalent of $500 million. The '3' recovery rating on the term
loan B indicates our expectation for meaningful recovery (50%-70%;
rounded estimate: 60%) for lenders in the event of a payment
default. We do not rate the $750 million ABL facility due in 2023.

"The 'BB' issuer credit rating reflects our expectation that Thor
will experience very high EBITDA volatility over the economic cycle
compared to other leisure companies and we have assumed that the
company will actively pursue opportunistic acquisitions, partly
offset by moderate pro forma adjusted debt to EBITDA in the low-2x
area by the end of fiscal 2019 (ending in July). The rating also
reflects the company's substantial market share of approximately
48% in the North American recreational vehicles (RV) market;
majority revenue exposure to the lower-priced and less-volatile
towables RV segment, which we view more favorably than the
motorized segment; and improved geographic and product diversity
subsequent to the acquisition of Erwin Hymer.

"The outlook is stable despite our base-case forecast for pro forma
adjusted debt to EBITDA in the low-2x area in fiscal year 2019 to
improve to the high-1x area in fiscal 2020. This is because we
believe Thor is likely to use incremental leverage from time to
time to complete potentially large acquisitions, similar to the
company's recent track record. Our outlook also reflects modest
organic EBITDA growth over the next two years and good cash flow
generation, resulting in capacity to voluntarily repay debt and
deleverage over our forecast period, absent additional
acquisitions."



THX PROPERTIES: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
----------------------------------------------------
THX Properties, LLC, filed a plan of liquidation and accompanying
disclosure statement following the sale of Sumeer Homes, Inc., in
June.

After the sale was approved by the Court, the title company
insuring the proposed sale found an affidavit filed by Wiebe in the
real property records of Denton County, Texas, of which the Debtor
was not aware, filed by Wiebe, claiming that the Wiebe Contract to
purchase the Property was still in force and effect.

THX believes that Wiebe has no colorable legitimate claim that his
contract has not been
terminated.  THX has filed a motion requesting that it be permitted
to reject the contract with Wiebe, whatever the contract's merits
are.

Even if the Wiebe contract was in force, which it is not, it has no
value because Wiebe has no
financial ability to follow through with the Wiebe Contract and the
Wiebe Contract is not assignable by Wiebe except to a related
party.  THX believes it has a cause of action against Weibe for
fraud, slander to title, tortious interference with contract, and
wrongfully placing fraudulent cloud on title, violation of Chapter
12, Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code and various related
causes of action.  THX reserves the right to bring suit against
Weibe as a result of this.

All causes of action which may exist by the Debtor against the
Members and their principals were compromised pursuant to these
agreements entered into in connection with the Sale Order.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement from PacerMonitor.com is
available at https://tinyurl.com/yao38q3h at no charge.

                     About THX Properties

THX Properties, LLC, is a real estate company that owned in fee
simple 86 Townhome lots, common areas as well as architectural
plans relating to a real estate project located at Solana Circle,
Denton, Texas.

THX Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 18-41409) on June 29, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Jason Helal, its manager, the Debtor disclosed
$3.28 million in assets and $3.71 million in liabilities.

Judge Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the case.

Weldon L. Moore, III, Esq., at Sussman & Moore, L.L.P., serves as
counsel to the Debtor.



TITAN ENERGY: Executives Elect to Reduce Base Salaries
------------------------------------------------------
Edward E. Cohen, executive chairman of the Board of Directors of
Titan Energy, LLC, and Jonathan Z. Cohen, executive vice chairman
of the Board, each informed the Board of his election to
voluntarily reduce his base salary to $125,000, effective as of
Oct. 1, 2018.  These reduced Base Salaries coincide with the cash
compensation currently paid to non-employee members of the Board.

                       About Titan Energy

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based Titan Energy, LLC --
http://www.titanenergyllc.com/-- is an independent developer and
producer of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs),
with operations in basins across the United States with a focus on
the horizontal development of resource potential from the Eagle
Ford Shale in South Texas.  The Company is a sponsor and manager of
Drilling Partnerships in which the Company co-invest, to finance a
portion of its natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids
production activities.

For the period from Sept. 1 through Dec. 31, 2016, Titan Energy
reported a net loss of $33.31 million.  For the period from Jan. 1,
2016, through Aug. 31, 2016, the Company reported a net loss of
$177.4 million.  As of Sept. 30, 2017, Titan Energy had $605.4
million in total assets, $605.5 million in total liabilities, and a
$61,000 total members' deficit.

Grant Thornton LLP, in Cleveland, Ohio, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the
Company does not have sufficient liquidity to repay all of its
current debt obligations.  The Company's business plan for 2017
contemplates asset sales, obtaining additional working capital, and
the refinancing or restructuring of its credit agreements to
long-term arrangements, or other modifications to its capital
structure.  The Company's ability to achieve the foregoing elements
of its business plan, which may be necessary to permit the
realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business, is uncertain and raises substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


TOPS HOLDING: Seeks Jan. 22 Exclusive Filing Period Extension
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tops Holding II Corporation and its debtor affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to extend
the Debtors' exclusive periods in which to file a chapter 11 plan
and solicit acceptances thereof through and including Jan. 22, 2019
and March 21, 2019, respectively.

A hearing will be held on Oct. 25, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. during which
time the Court will consider extending Debtors' exclusive periods.
Any responses or objection must be filed and served no later than
Oct. 18 at 4:00 p.m.

The Debtors contend that they commenced the chapter 11 cases to
accomplish a comprehensive financial restructuring with three core
objectives: (i) deleveraging the Debtors' balance sheet; (ii)
ensuring that the Debtors' leases and supply agreements provide the
best available terms; and (iii) constructively engaging with the
UFCW Local One and the UFCW Local One Pension Fund, and the
Teamsters Local 264 and the Teamsters Pension Fund on labor and
pension issues.

Quite remarkably, the Debtors claim that they have accomplished all
of these goals in less than eight months, with hardly any
litigation along the way. Specifically, the Debtors have filed, and
are currently soliciting votes with respect to, a fully consensual
plan of reorganization, which enjoys the support of the ad hoc
committee of creditors holding more than 87% of the Debtors' senior
secured notes and providers of the Debtors' DIP Term Loan Facility
("Ad Hoc Committee"), Bank of America, N.A., as administrative
agent under the Debtors' DIP ABL Facility, and the Creditors'
Committee.

Among other things, the Debtors' Plan provides for the substantial
reduction of their funded debt by approximately $445 million and a
net reduction of their annual debt service obligations by
approximately $36 million. As a result of the savings achieved by
the Debtors during these cases and the significant reduction to
their funded debt and debt service obligations, the Debtors
anticipate that they will have the necessary capital to invest in
and grow their business and assure their long-term viability.

Pursuant to the Plan, upon emergence from chapter 11, the Debtors'
obligations under their debtor-in-possession financing facilities
will be refinanced through exit facilities and the Debtors' lenders
will provide an additional $35 million of new capital at exit to
support the Debtors' post-emergence operations. As a result, the
Debtors believe that they will have almost $100 million in
liquidity upon emergence from chapter 11.

In addition, the Debtors claim that they have consensually resolved
significant labor issues through two monumental settlements that
were achieved -- and approved by the Court -- during these cases.
Specifically, after hard fought, arms'-length negotiations, the
Debtors reached a comprehensive, global settlement ("Global
Teamsters/C&S Settlement") of a highly contentious four-and-a-half
year dispute with the Teamsters Pension Fund, the Teamsters Local
264, and C&S, the Debtors' largest supplier.  Among other things,
the Global Teamsters/C&S Settlement resolved all issues arising out
of the Erie Transaction, including any withdrawal liability related
thereto and all indemnity obligations to C&S. It also paved the way
for new collective bargaining agreements between the Debtors and
the Teamsters Local 264 that will stabilize the Debtors'
relationship with their warehouse employees.

More recently, the Debtors relate that after more hard fought,
arms'-length negotiations, and in consultation with the Ad Hoc
Committee, the Debtors reached a comprehensive, global settlement
("UFCW Local One Settlement") with the UFCW Local One and the UFCW
Local One Pension Fund, among others, that resolved the Debtors'
pension contribution obligations without the need for litigation or
the need to seek other relief. In addition, the Amended UFCW Local
One CBAs will ensure that the Debtors have certainty of terms and
conditions with their primary workforce as they emerge from chapter
11.

Finally, pursuant to the Global Teamsters/C&S Settlement, the
Debtors assumed their C&S Supply Agreements, preserving the
agreements' favorable terms and price levels, while not impairing
the Debtors' ability to procure on more favorable terms going
forward.  The Debtors also undertook a comprehensive review of
their lease portfolio and have secured approximately $27 million in
lease savings through negotiations with landlords.

Having resolved all of the significant issues in these cases, the
Debtors are committed to moving expeditiously through the
confirmation process and towards consummation of the Plan.  The
Confirmation Hearing, however, is scheduled to begin on Nov. 8,
2018, after the expiration of the current Exclusive Filing Period.
Accordingly, out of an abundance of caution, the Debtors seek a
further extension of the Exclusive Filing Period and the Exclusive
Solicitation Period to Jan. 22, 2019 and March 21, 2019,
respectively.

Considering the contingencies and challenges facing the Debtors at
the outset of these cases, the Debtors have proceeded through these
chapter 11 cases with speed and efficiency.  The Debtors contend
that their conduct in these chapter 11 cases, in particular, the
limited number of contested issues that have required judicial
intervention, the support of their key stakeholders virtually every
step of the way, and the fully consensual Plan, all demonstrate
that Debtors are acting in a prudent and transparent manner and are
not seeking these extensions to artificially delay the
administration of these chapter 11 cases or to hold creditors
hostage to an unsatisfactory plan proposal.

              About Tops Holding II Corporation

Tops Markets, LLC -- http://www.topsmarkets.com/-- is
headquartered in Williamsville, NY and operates 169 full-service
supermarkets with five additional by franchisees under the Tops
Markets banner.  Tops employs over 14,000 associates and is a
full-service grocery retailer in Upstate New York, Northern
Pennsylvania, and Vermont.

Tops Management, led by Frank Curci, its chairman and chief
executive officer, acquired Tops in December 2013 through a
leveraged buyout from Morgan Stanley's private equity arm.  Morgan
Stanley bought the company in 2007 from the Dutch retailer now
known as Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV.  In 2010, Tops acquired The
Penn Traffic Company, a local chain with 64 stores.  In 2012, it
purchased 21 Grand Union Family Markets stores.

Tops Holding II Corporation, and its subsidiaries, including Tops
Markets, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead
Case No. 18-22279) on Feb. 21, 2018, to pursue a financial
restructuring that would eliminate a substantial portion of debt
from the Company's balance sheet and position Tops for long-term
success.

The Company listed total assets of $977 million and total
liabilities at $1.17 billion as of Dec. 30, 2017.

The Debtors hired Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as their legal
counsel; Hilco Real Estate, LLC as real estate advisor; Evercore
Group L.L.C. as investment banker; FTI Consulting, Inc., and
Michael Buenzow as chief restructuring officer; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as their claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on March 6, 2018.  The committee tapped
Morrison & Foerster LLP as its legal counsel, and Zolfo Cooper,
LLC, as its financial advisor and bankruptcy consultant.


TPC GROUP: Fitch Assigns B- Issuer Default Rating, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a first-time Long-Term Issuer Default
Rating (IDR) of 'B-' to TPC Group, Inc. (TPC) and its indirect
wholly owned subsidiary TPC Phoenix Fuels LLC (TPC Phoenix).
Additionally, Fitch has assigned a 'BB-'/'RR1' rating to TPC's
first lien senior secured ABL revolver and ABL FILO tranche, a
'B-'/'RR4' to its first lien senior secured notes, and a
'BB-'/'RR1' to TPC Phoenix's first lien senior secured term loan
and first lien senior secured delayed draw term loan. The Rating
Outlook is Stable.

TPC's ratings are supported by the company's targeted
infrastructure enhancements, which Fitch believes will lead to
fewer plant turnarounds, reduce operating and capital costs, and
improve the long-term reliability of its facilities, helping
mitigate operational and non-commodity cost risks. The asset base
improvements, coupled with currently strong North American ethylene
plant industry dynamics and a favourable new contract structure
that moderates margin risks, should improve the company's daily
production volume and cash flow profiles. Fitch projects TPC will
see FCF grow from slightly positive in 2018 to around $50 million
to $60 million/year through 2021 due to the upcoming wave of new
ethylene capacity that should lead to higher utilization rates for
the C4 segment.

TPC's history of cash flow volatility, operational issues, elevated
leverage metrics, and constrained liquidity, as well as its
maturity wall in 2020, are risks to the credit. However, Fitch
believes the company's efforts to improve operational reliability
and moderate margin variability through improved contract terms
should help the company generate FCF and lead to an improved
liquidity and leverage profile (Fitch base case forecasts gross
leverage around 4.5x by 2019). This should help TPC mitigate
refinance risks associated with its upcoming debt maturities.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Operational Inflection Point: Fitch believes that TPC's asset base
is primed for operational momentum after several years of
disruptions (planned and unplanned) due to the company's targeted
infrastructure enhancements, which should improve the reliability
of its facilities and reduce the frequency and length of planned
and unplanned turnarounds. TPC's financial results had previously
suffered from several unplanned outages, most notably in its
dehydro unit, which has seen only intermittent periods of
successful operation since it was brought online in 2015. When the
dehydro unit went down again in late 2017, TPC decided to bring
forward an upcoming planned turnaround and allocated a significant
portion of the total turnaround costs towards facility improvements
designed to address the previous operational issues of the plant.
Fitch expects the on-stream time of the unit to be higher than
recent historical levels throughout the forecast.

Fitch believes utilization of the C4 processing segment will
increase as ethylene production plants begin/ramp up production,
but construction/operational delays remain a key volumetric risk
over the rating horizon. Unplanned outages and weather related
disruptions in 1H18 lowered utilization rates at TPC's C4 plants.
While the C4 facilities have generally proven reliable, unscheduled
outages are an inherent risk of operating such assets. Any
unplanned disruptions in either the C4 processing segment or the
dehydro unit that results in increased frequency or length of plant
turnarounds could alter utilization rates dramatically and put
significant negative pressure on TPC's financial results.

New Contracts Lessen Volatility: TPC's C4 contract model has
improved since 2016, reducing price risk and providing less
variable profit margins. Under its new agreements, the company
generates a fixed C4 processing fee with the potential for further
upside based on end-market prices; however, Fitch doesn't expect
any upside under its base case assumptions. Prior to 2016, raw
material costs and realized revenues were based on benchmark
commodity indices, which led to volatile earnings/losses that
exposed margins to market conditions. A significant portion of
TPC's MTBE production comes from its dehydro unit, which is sold
under contracts that provide for a floor price linked minimum gross
profit.

Fitch views the move towards less market sensitive contracts as a
credit positive that helps reduce volatility and provides for a
relatively less variable cash flow profile.

Positive FCF Generation Expected: Fitch projects TPC will generate
slightly positive FCF in 2018 before turning meaningfully FCF
positive in the outer years, generating around $50 million to $60
million in annual FCF through 2021. The negative FCF profile of
years past was largely due to operational issues with the company's
dehyro unit and the previous contract model that exposed its
earnings to market price volatility. Fitch believes management has
taken steps to help mitigate both issues and projects the improved
asset base and contract profile will lead to relatively more
consistent FCF generation. Any operational delays in the ethylene
facilities coming online could alter Fitch's projections somewhat;
however, this is largely a timing issue, as the capacity considered
in Fitch's projections is largely from plants that have already
begun construction, making them highly likely to finish building,
particularly given Fitch's view that North American cracking
economics will be advantaged.

Contract Renewal Risk: The duration of TPC's new contracts is
relatively short, which increases renewal risk should the company
receive pushback on the new structure from its customers. Fitch
views this risk as manageable given TPC's operating history and
leadership position within the industry, and understands customer
response has been generally favourable, with a majority of
customers now under the new structure. However any material changes
to the contracts over the renewal period that reintroduces
significant commodity price exposure could heighten cash flow risk
and would likely put negative pressure on TPC's ratings.

Limited Size and Scale: TPC's business risk is heightened by its
reliance on two manufacturing complexes that combined generate all
of its earnings. Any operational disruptions can significantly
crimp its cash flow generation, as evidenced by the company's
pressured financial profile when the dehydro unit went down for
nearly all of Q1'18. While Fitch believes the risk of unplanned
outages has been managed down with recent operational improvements,
TPC's financial profile is still highly levered to the effects of
any operational disruptions at either of its facilities.

Required Refinancing: Nearly all of TPC's debt comes due in 2020,
which places added near-term pressure on the company to execute
operationally and demonstrate improving financial trends. Fitch
believes the company's projected EBITDA growth and FCF generation
will help moderate refinancing risk.

Parent/Subsidiary Linkage Strong: Fitch believes there are strong
legal and operational ties between TPC Group, Inc. and its
indirect, wholly owned subsidiary TPC Phoenix. The subsidiaries
have the stronger credit profile because they are the operators of
the assets, with TPC Phoenix operating the MTBE assets. However,
there are upstream and downstream guarantees between the borrowers
and restricted subsidiaries, which include both TPC Group, Inc. and
TPC Phoenix, and a default at TPC Group accelerates a default at
TPC Phoenix. As per Fitch's Parent Subsidiary Rating Linkage
criteria, such linkages justify assigning the same IDR to both
entities.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

TPC Group has lower leverage than SK Blue Holdings, LP (B/Stable)
and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (B-/Stable) and
should see gross leverage of around 3.5x in 2021, compared with
around 4.0x for SK Blue and Calumet. However, SK Blue and Calumet
are larger in size and scale than TPC. SK Blue benefits from a
global operational footprint and access to an expansive and
flexible logistics/production networks while Calumet has a
significantly larger US footprint. This compares against TPC's
reliance on two manufacturing facilities both located in the U.S.
SK Blue is also considerably more specialized than TPC and Calumet,
as evidenced by the company's slightly higher EBITDA margins of
around 16% by 2021. These credit strengths enable SK Blue to
support a higher debt load than TPC and a subsequently higher IDR.
TPC and Calumet's IDRs are at the same level due to each company's
relatively more volatile cash flow profile that is expected to
improve and stabilize over the forecast horizon due to self-help
steps and more favourable market conditions.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - C4 production growth in 2019 and 2020 as Ethylene plants come
online/ramp-up and the C4 Processing Segment reaches capacity;

  - Performance Products production growth driven by improved
dehydro unit efficiency in 2019 and 2021, with a decrease in
volumes in 2020 for TPC's next planned turnaround of the unit;

  - Relatively stable gross profit margins reflecting new contract
structure;

  - Capex in line with management guidance;

- Debt maturities refinanced in 2020 with a combination of debt and
cash on hand.

Fitch's Recovery Assumptions

Fitch analysed TPC's recovery ratings on a going-concern approach
and arrived at a post-bankruptcy enterprise value by estimating a
going-concern EBITDA and EV multiple. Fitch believes a bankruptcy
scenario for TPC would likely stem from a pro-longed period of
unplanned disruptions or other operational hurdles that signal a
weakness of the company's asset base and result in lower
production/increased cash flow variability.

Fitch made the following going-concern assumptions:

  -- Fitch assumed a consolidated going-concern EBITDA of $135
million for TPC. The majority of this consolidated number comes
from the C4 and isobutylene derivatives assets, which have
relatively less cash flow volatility and should benefit from
favourable industry conditions. The going concern EBITDA estimate
for the MTBE assets reflects their more commoditized nature and
volatile end-market demand;

  -- The C4 processing and isobutylene derivatives assets received
a multiple of 5.0x. These assets have less cash flow risk than the
MTBE assets, but are not quite as specialized as other peers in the
specialty chemicals space, who could see multiples in the
high-single digits if their products are considered highly
differentiated (generally margins in excess of 20%). While the
isobutylene derivatives segment is highly specialized and generates
considerable cash flow, the C4 segment accounts for a majority of
TPC's earnings and Fitch views most of the downstream products as
more commoditized;

  -- Fitch assigned TPC's MTBE assets, which secure the Riverstone
term loan, a 3.5x multiple, consistent with the segment's more
commoditized products and volatile demand profile;

  -- Fitch assumes that the DDTL and ABL (revolver and FILO
tranche) are fully drawn up to the available borrowing base.

The recovery analysis reflects the differing collateral packages of
the Riverstone term loan and ABL/FILO facilities. The Riverstone
term loan is secured by a first priority lien on TPC's MTBE assets
and ranks pari passu with the collateral package of the senior
secured notes. The ABL and FILO benefit from a first priority lien
on the A/R and inventory of substantially all of TPC's other assets
excluding MTBE and a second lien priority on non-MTBE Net PP&E.
Fitch's recovery analysis calculated initial recovery for the
Riverstone term loan separately based off the estimated going
concern EBITDA for the MTBE assets and associated 3.5x multiple.
The remaining amount of the term loan not recovered by the MTBE
collateral package recovers equally with the secured notes from any
excess proceeds beyond the assumed ABL/FILO borrowings.

The enterprise value is deducted by 10% for administrative claims,
leaving the remaining amount available to creditors. The ABL
facility (revolver and FILO tranche) recover fully at RR1/100%, the
senior secured term loan recovers at RR1/91% and the senior secured
notes recover partially at RR4/44%

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - Improved operational stability signalled by high utilization
across both segments, a decreased risk of unplanned disruptions and
increased size and scale;

  - Retention of favourable contract terms, allowing TPC to
maintain its lower margin volatility;

  - Successful refinancing of 2020 debt maturities and continued
strong operational performance with leverage sustained around
3.5x;

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Continued unplanned disruptions (outside of weather/third party
incidents), signalling a continued weakness in the company's asset
base;

  - Inability to renew contracts at current terms leading to
greater cash flow volatility;

  - Reduced liquidity driven by negative FCF increasing refinance
risk;

  - Interest Coverage trending below 1.5x

LIQUIDITY

Improving Liquidity Position: Fitch expects TPC's liquidity
position to improve over the forecast horizon, highlighted by
increasing FCF generation that should help lead to a successful
refinancing of the company's 2020 maturities and gross debt
reduction. Fitch expects TPC to maintain a nominal amount of cash
on its balance sheet. Fitch views TPC's primary sources of
liquidity as cash on hand, revolver availability and the DDTL.

Approaching Debt Maturities: TPC's senior secured term loan and
senior secured notes mature in 2020, with the term loan maturing
first on January 30, 2020 and the notes maturing in the fourth
quarter on December 15, 2020. The revolving credit facility matures
in 2022. TPC has no quarterly amortization payments.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned first-time ratings as follows:

TPC Group, Inc.

  - Long-Term IDR 'B-'

  - First Lien Secured ABL Revolver 'BB-'/'RR1'

  - First Lien Secured ABL FILO Tranche 'BB-'/'RR1'

  - First Lien Secured Bonds 'B-'/'RR4'

TPC Phoenix Fuels LLC

  - Long-Term IDR 'B-'

  - First Lien Secured Delayed Draw Term Loan 'BB-'/'RR1'

  - First Lien Secured Term Loan 'BB-'/'RR1'

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


TRADER CORP: S&P Assigns B Rating on C$200MM First-Lien Debt
------------------------------------------------------------
Trader Corp., on Oct. 2, 2018, refinanced its C$200 million
second-lien debt into a new C$200 million first-lien debt facility.
As a result, on Oct. 9, S&P Global Ratings withdrew its 'CCC+'
issue-level rating and '6' recovery rating on the second-lien
facility because it has been repaid.

At the same time, S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level
rating and '3' recovery rating to Trader's new C$200 million
first-lien facility. S&P Global Ratings also affirmed its 'B'
issue-level rating, with a '3' recovery rating, on the existing
U.S.-dollar first-lien debt. The '3' recovery rating reflects S&P's
expectation of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate 50%) in a
default scenario.

Finally, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' long-term issuer
credit rating on Trader. The outlook is stable.

The affirmation reflects the leverage-neutral transaction because
the million first-lien facility will repay the second-lien debt.
S&P said, "Nevertheless, we view this transaction to be credit
positive because it lowers Trader's interest rate by about 425
basis points, to 3.25% from 7.5%. As a result, we expect EBITDA
interest coverage to improve to about 3.5x from our previous 3.0x.
Despite the improvement in interest coverage and cash flow, our
rating on Trader is constrained by the company's leverage above 5x
and financial sponsor ownership."

S&P said, "Our weak business risk assessment reflects Trader's
participation in highly competitive online advertising, small
scale, limited diversity, and exposure to cyclical automotive
advertising spending. This is partially mitigated by the company's
significant penetration in the Canadian used car market, recurring
revenues, and high operating leverage amid growing revenues.

"The stable outlook reflects S&P Global Ratings' view that Trader
will maintain adjusted debt-to-EBITDA of about 5.5x-6.0x and EBITDA
interest coverage above 3.0x. In addition, we expect organic
revenue growth and higher margins should support modest free cash
flow generation that could be used toward debt repayment.

"We could lower the ratings if Trader's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA
increases to 9.0x or EBITDA interest coverage approaches 1.5x. We
could potentially see this scenario if EBITDA declines by more than
25% from our base-case scenario due to lower earnings from weak
macro-economic factors or if debt increases by more than 30% from a
dividend recapitalization without a significant increase in
earnings and cash flows.

"We are unlikely to raise the ratings on Trader given its high
leverage and financial sponsor ownership. However, we could
consider an upgrade if we expect the company will sustain adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA below 5x, even with the possibility for increased
shareholder distributions."



TRANSDIGM GROUP: Fitch Affirms 'B' Issuer Default Rating
--------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDR) of TransDigm Group, Inc. (NYSE: TDG) and its subsidiary
TransDigm Inc. (TDI) at 'B'. This follows the company's
announcement that it has agreed to acquire Esterline Technologies
Corp. (ESL) for a total consideration of approximately $4 billion
including assumed debt. Fitch has also affirmed the ratings of
TDI's senior secured credit facilities at 'BB'/'RR1' and TDI's and
TransDigm UK Holdings plc's senior subordinated notes at
'B-'/'RR5'.

The transaction is expected to close in the second half of calendar
2019 and is subject to approvals by regulators and shareholders of
ESL. TDG expects to finance the transaction with a combination of
cash on hand (approximately $2 billion) and the issuance of
incremental term loans. The Rating Outlook is Stable. The ratings
cover approximately $12.7 billion of outstanding debt.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The affirmation of TDG's ratings is based on Fitch's updated
projections for the company including the impact of the ESL
acquisition. The anticipated increase in the company's leverage
metrics following the acquisition will not trigger Fitch's negative
rating sensitivities, as outlined, and Fitch believes the company's
overall credit profile will not change significantly. Fitch's base
case projections for the company already assumed debt-funded
acquisitions in the coming years, so the ESL transaction is not
entirely incremental to Fitch's expectations. In addition, a
sizable portion of the ESL acquisition will be financed with cash,
lessening the impact on TDG's credit profile. Fitch has some
concerns regarding the valuation of the transaction and its
integration, but these concerns are not significant enough to drive
a rating change.

TDG announced that it has reached an agreement to purchase ESL for
a total of $4 billion funded through new debt issuance and cash on
hand. The purchase price equates to $122.5 a share, which comprises
an approximately 38% premium to the closing price of ESL's stock on
Tuesday, Oct. 9, 2018. ESL manufactures specialty aerospace,
defense and industrial products with high proprietary and sole
source content. Fitch expects ESL will report approximately $2
billion of revenue and $300 million of EBITDA in fiscal year ended
Sept. 30, 2018, compared to TDG's anticipated revenue of $3.8
billion and EBITDA of $1.8 billion also in the fiscal year ended
Sept. 30, 2018.

The acquisition is expected to be fully accretive by the middle of
fiscal year 2020, and Fitch projects TDG will generate $5 billion
in revenues and $2 billion EBITDA by Sept. 30, 2019. The
acquisition will enable the company to expand horizontally. Fitch
estimates the new debt associated with the acquisition will
increase TDG's adjusted leverage (adjusted debt/EBITDAR) from
approximately 7.1x at the end of fiscal 2018 to approximately 8.0x
at the end of fiscal 2019, but Fitch expects the company's adjusted
leverage will be approximately 7.1x on a pro forma basis including
ESL's full results.

TDG's ratings are supported by strong FCF generation (cash from
operations less capex and regular dividends), good liquidity,
strong margins, healthy commercial aerospace markets, higher U.S.
defense spending, and a favorable debt maturity schedule. TDG
generates significant cash flow due to the ability to command a
premium for its products. A high percentage of sales from a
relatively stable and profitable aftermarket business, low research
and development costs, low capex and a high percentage of sole
source products support TDG's industry-leading 47% EBITDA margins
and above 20% FCF margins.

Rating concerns include the company's high leverage, declining
interest coverage, long-term cash deployment strategy which focuses
on acquisitions and occasional debt-funded special dividends, and
weak collateral support for the secured bank facility in terms of
asset coverage. Even though TDG is a serial acquirer and has a
demonstrated ability to seamlessly integrate multiple acquisitions
annually, Fitch is concerned with the integration risk as the ESL
acquisition will be the largest acquisition in the company's
history.

Although TDI is stronger than TDG, the IDRs of both entities are
equalized because of strong operating ties between the entities as
TDI (the issuing entity) is the main operating subsidiary of TDG
and is consolidated in the parent's financial statements.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

TDG does not have any similarly sized peers with comparable
operating profiles. The company has some of the highest operating
margins and percentage of sole-source and proprietary product among
aerospace and defense companies rated by Fitch. The company's
diversification, high content of aftermarket sales, strong
operations and cash generation are commensurate with higher-rated
aerospace & defense companies such as Rockwell Collins Inc.
However, TDG's financial policies, which include an appetite for
high-leverage, debt-funded acquisitions and special dividends,
override its strong, non-leverage credit metrics.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:

  -- The transaction will close in the second half of calendar
2019;

  -- ESL revenues will be only partially accretive with TDG's
financial results in fiscal 2019 and will be fully reflected only
by fiscal 2020;

  -- TDG will finance the $4 billion acquisition by the issuance of
additional term loan in the range of $2 billion to $3 billion and
will finance the remainder with cash on balance sheet;

  -- TDG's margins will decrease in fiscal 2019 following the
acquisition of ESL; EBITDA margins will decrease to 38% down from
47% by 2020 as ESL's results will be fully consolidated;

  -- TDG will make additional acquisitions in fiscal 2019 and
beyond,

  -- TDG will maintain leverage in the range of 7x-8x over the
rating horizon;

  -- Excess cash will be paid to shareholders in the form of
special dividends or share repurchases if the company does not
make acquisitions;

  -- The company will maintain cash balances of $500 million-$1
billion through rating horizon

  -- Fitch assumes the company will issue new debt in the range of
$500 million to $1.5 billion annually. Fitch expects the majority
of the newly issued debt will be in the form of senior secured term
loans, however this should not pressure its RR5 recovery
expectations for the senior subordinated notes.

KEY RECOVERY RATING ASSUMPTIONS

The recovery analysis assumes TDG would be considered a going
concern and would be reorganized rather than liquidated. Fitch has
assumed a 10% administrative claim in the recovery analysis.

TDG's recovery analysis reflects a potential severe down-cycle in
the aerospace market and assesses the going concern pro forma
EBITDA at approximately $1.82 billion based on the company's stable
operations, high operating margins and significant percentage of
revenues derived from aftermarket products. The $1.82 billion
ongoing EBITDA assumption represents an approximately 20% decline
from Fitch's projected pro forma EBITDA at the end of fiscal 2018.

Fitch expects the EV multiple used in the TDG recovery analysis
will fluctuate in the range of 7x-8x, and Fitch is currently using
a 7.5x multiple to calculate a post-reorganization valuation.
Enterprise value-to-forward EBITDA multiples ranged from 4.8x-8.8x
on the three Aerospace & Defense (A&D) bankruptcy plan observations
available, with two of the three exit multiples being lower than
the median 6.1x cross-sector exit multiple in Fitch's U.S.
corporate bankruptcy database. The A&D defaulters typically had
significant operational issues; low product, contract and customer
diversification; or delays in receipt of contractual revenues in
addition to over-leveraged capital structures. While TDG has a
highly leveraged capital structure, Fitch believes the company's
business profile is stronger than the profiles in the A&D
bankruptcy observations.

Fitch utilizes the 7.5x EV multiple based on TDG's solid contract
and product diversifications, high percentage of sole-source and
proprietary products, and significant EBITDA derivation from higher
margin and more stable aftermarket sales. In addition, recent
transactions for similar companies have been completed at EBITDA
multiples in the range of 11x-12x, as evidenced by a recent
purchase of Orbital ATK, Inc. by Northrop Grumman Corporation at an
approximately 14x EBITDA multiple earlier in 2018.

The $600 million revolving credit facility (RFC) and the $300
million accounts receivable securitization facility (ARSF) are
assumed to be fully drawn upon default. The ARSF, RFC and first
lien senior secured term loans are senior to the senior
subordinated unsecured notes in the waterfall.

The waterfall results in a 100% recovery corresponding to a
Recovery Rating of 'RR1' for the first lien (assumed at $10.6
billion following the completion of the acquisition) and ARSF ($300
million). The waterfall also indicates a 14% recovery corresponding
to 'RR5' for the senior subordinated unsecured notes ($5.1
billion).

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Actions

  - Fitch does not anticipate positive rating actions in the near
term given current credit metrics and the company's cash-deployment
strategies. Positive rating actions could be considered if the
company modifies its cash-deployment strategy and focuses on debt
reduction.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Actions

  - A negative rating action may be considered if there is
significant cash flow margin erosion without commensurate
deleveraging of the company.

  - Fitch may consider a negative rating action if TDG's adjusted
leverage (adjusted debt to EBITDAR) and FFO-adjusted leverage
increase and remain between 8.0x and 8.25x, and above 9.5x,
respectively, driven by weakening of the global economy, a downturn
in the aerospace sector, or by issuance of additional debt to fund
special dividends or acquisitions.

  - Fitch may take a negative rating action on the senior
subordinated notes if their recovery prospects deteriorate due to
an issuance of new senior secured debt.

LIQUIDITY

Good Liquidity: Fitch anticipates recently completed and future
acquisitions will allow TDG to accelerate its revenue, EBITDA and
FCF growth over the rating horizon. TDG has adequate financial
flexibility and good liquidity supported by a $600 million
revolving credit facility and a sizable cash balance, as the
company typically holds above $500 million in cash.

As of June 30, 2018, TDG held $1.9 billion in cash and equivalents
and $685 million of revolver availability after giving effect to
$15 million of letters of credit outstanding. The company does not
have significant debt maturities until 2020, when $550 million of
senior subordinated notes become due. Fitch anticipates the company
will refinance the maturing debt and estimates TDG's liquidity will
typically fluctuate between $1 billion to $1.5 billion over the
rating horizon.

Debt Structure: TDG's capital structure consists of senior secured
credit facilities, senior subordinated unsecured notes and a $300
million trade receivable securitization facility. As of July 18,
2018, the company had a $600 million senior secured revolver
maturing in 2022, three outstanding senior secured term loan
tranches under its credit facility, with a total amount outstanding
of approximately $7.6 billion, and $5.1 billion of aggregate
outstanding subordinated bonds.

On May 31, 2018, the company refinanced and upsized tranche F term
loans by $1.15 billion to a total amount of $2.88 billion, and
retired $500 million senior subordinated notes due 2021. The
tranche F matures in June 2023, the tranche G matures in August
2023, and the tranche E matures in May 2025. On May 8, 2018 TDG UK,
a first time issuer and direct wholly owned subsidiary of TDG,
issued $500 million of subordinated notes due in 2026. TDI is a
co-obligor of the $500 million senior subordinated debt issued by
TDG UK.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has taken the following ratings actions:

TransDigm Group Inc.

  -- Long-term IDR affirmed at 'B'.

TransDigm Inc.

  -- IDR affirmed at 'B';

  -- Senior secured revolving credit facility affirmed at
'BB'/'RR1';

  -- Senior secured term loans affirmed at 'BB'/'RR1';

  -- Senior subordinated notes affirmed at 'B-'/'RR5'.

TransDigm UK Holdings plc

  -- Senior subordinated notes affirmed at 'B-'/'RR5'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


TRANSDIGM INC: S&P Places 'B+' ICR on CreditWatch Negative
----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings placed all of its ratings, including its 'B+'
issuer credit rating, on TransDigm Inc. on CreditWatch with
negative implications.

The CreditWatch placement follows TransDigm's announcement that it
reached a definitive agreement to acquire Esterline Technologies
Corp. for approximately $4 billion, including the assumption of
debt. S&P said, "Although financing plans are not decided, we
believe that the transaction could weaken the company's credit
metrics beyond our 7x debt to EBITDA downgrade trigger. While
Esterline brings additional scale and capabilities, it also has
much lower profitability (EBITDA margins around 15% compared to
almost 50% at TransDigm), has a lower proportion of aftermarket
sales, and participates in more competitive markets than TransDigm.
Therefore, the combination may not improve TransDigm's competitive
position enough to offset the increase in debt. This is also by far
the company's largest acquisition, leading to the potential for
integration risk. It will likely be challenged to materially
improve margins at Esterline, as it did with other acquisitions. We
also expect the company to maintain its very aggressive financial
policy, pursuing large debt-financed acquisitions and occasionally
dividends."

S&P said, "We plan to resolve the CreditWatch when we have further
information regarding the proposed financing of the transaction,
details of the company's strategic rationale for the acquisition,
and financial policy. We could lower our issuer credit rating on
TransDigm by one notch if we believe the company's financial
policy, addition of a lower-margin business, and integration risk
would result in debt-to-EBITDA ratio remaining above 7x for an
extended period despite added scale and new capabilities. We will
determine the impact on our issue-level and recovery ratings once
the company announces a financing plan for the acquisition."



TRANSMISSION SOLUTIONS: Sunshine Buying Hunker Property for $350K
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Transmission Solutions Group, Inc., asks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to sell
assets consisting primarily of Calhoun Satellite Communications,
Inc.'s stock and a parcel of real estate, with two buildings
erected thereon, designated as 1007 Old Route 119, in the city of
Hunker, located on the border line of Hempfield and East Huntingdon
Townships, in Westmoreland County in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, to Sunshine Acquisitions, Inc. for $350,000, subject
to higher and better offers.

The Debtor is the parent corporation of Calhoun, which is also a
Debtor under Chapter 11 before the Court at Case No. 17-23389.  The
Debtor's assets consist primarily of the Property.

The Debtor has never been an operating entity, and its Chapter 11
case was filed mainly to avoid judicial actions by entities to whom
the Debtor and Calhoun were jointly obligated and to stay the
monthly rental payments owing to it by Calhoun, which payments were
being paid by Calhoun directly to the major secured creditor of
both companies.

Calhoun has now sold substantially all of its assets and is winding
up its affairs.  The stock of Calhoun does not have any value since
all of its assets have been sold.  

Transmission has received an offer to purchase the Property from
the Buyer for a price of $350,000.  The Buyer is the neighboring
company adjacent to the Debtor.  

The following parties may assert liens against the Property: (i)
Newtek Small Business Finance, LLC, the primary mortgagor of the
Property; (ii) Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania; (iii) Hempfield
Township, the township where 50% of the Property is located; (iv)
East Huntingdon Township, the township where 50% of the Property is
located; (v) Hempfield, the school district where Property is
located; (vi) the IRS; and (vii) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

The IRS and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania are not believed to
have claims or liens against the Property, but are being named as
Respondents for notice purposes.

The funds received from the sale will be insufficient to pay
outstanding taxes and the mortgage lien of Newtek in full, so it is
in the best interest of the Debtor's estate for the sale to be held
in the Bankruptcy Court, clear of all liens, claims, interests and
encumbrances thereupon, with the liens to attach to the proceeds of
said sale.

It is in the best interest of the creditors of the estate that the
DIP be authorized to sell the property pursuant to the terms set
forth in the Agreement.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Transmission_Solutions_215_Sales.pdf

It is believed, after investigation through inquiry with a
commercial broker, that the Debtor would be unlikely to obtain any
substantially higher or better offers by marketing the Property
through an agent, and that the advertising done in the framework of
a sale pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 363(b) will be sufficient to
attract any entity that may have an interest in commercial property
in the Westmoreland County area.

The Debtor asks the Court to authorize the sale of the Property
free and clear and divested of all liens, claims, interests and
encumbrances, with the liens to be transferred to the proceeds of
the sale of the Property with the sale costs and expenses be paid
in priority to creditors of the estate.

             About Transmission Solutions Group

Transmission Solutions Group, Inc., currently operates a satellite
transmission business located at 1007 Old Route 119, in Hunker, PA,
among other things, provides satellite transmission services for
network and cable television companies.  Transmission Solutions
filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
17-23388) on Aug. 22, 2017.  The Debtor hired Dennis J. Spyra,
Esq., as bankruptcy counsel.


UVLRX THERAPEUTICS: Creditors Prohibit Further Cash Collateral Use
------------------------------------------------------------------
Legacy Technology, Inc., and The Grotenhuis Family 2009 Revocable
Trust, secured creditors in this Chapter 11 case, ask the US
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to prohibit
UVLRx Therapeutics, Inc.'s use of cash collateral, and instruct
Debtor to segregate the cash collateral.

By the Debtor's own admission, the Creditors are owed not less than
$1,734,110 (exclusive of interest, fees, costs, and other expenses
which are continuing to accrue), which makes them the largest
creditors in this case. More importantly, the Creditors claim they
are the only secured creditors in this case and their claim is not
disputed.

The Creditors' claims are secured by, among other collateral, a
duly-perfected first-priority lien and security interest in all of
the tangible and intangible property listed on Schedule A to that
certain Security Agreement.

According to its recent filings, the Creditors discover that the
Debtor has very little cash or accounts receivable as of the
Petition Date, and the Debtor's gross receipts have fallen
precipitously over the past two years. Despite its illiquidity, the
Creditors argue that Debtor has requested permission to pay two
officers $9,000 per week plus expenses, with no justification for
the exorbitant salaries.

On Sept. 11, 2018, the Creditors wrote to the Debtor and made it
clear that they object to the use of cash collateral absent an
order of the Court and adequate protection. However, the Debtor has
not filed a motion for authority to use cash collateral. According
to Debtor's counsel, they have not yet been able to prepare a
budget.

Based on the sequence of the filings in this case so far, the
Creditors submit it appears that the Debtor's prerogative is paying
its officer's salaries rather than reorganizing for the benefit of
creditors.

The Creditors contend that the Debtor has not proposed any adequate
protection. In fact, the Debtor has not even proposed a budget,
despite several requests made by Creditors' counsel. Upon review of
the limited information available to the Creditors, it is clear
that the cash collateral is unprotected and likely diminishing.
After all, the Debtor has asked to pay $9,000 per week in salary to
two officers, even though the Debtor only has $15,000 in cash and
$9,000 in accounts receivable as of the Petition Date.

The Creditors, who are the only secured creditors in this case, do
not consent to the Debtor's use of cash collateral, so any order
authorizing its use must adequately protect the Creditors'
interest. Without the Creditors' consent or adequate protection --
both of which are absent in this case -- the Court should prohibit
the Debtor from using the Creditors' cash collateral.

Attorneys for Legacy Technology, Inc. and The Grotenhuis Family
2009 Revocable Trust

          John L. Dicks II, Esq.
          D. Brett Marks, Esq.
          AKERMAN LLP
          401 E. Jackson St., Suite 1700
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Telephone: 813.223.7333
          Facsimile: 813.218.5485
          E-mail: john.dicks@akerman.com
                  brett.marks@akerman.com

                    About UVLrx Therapeutics

Based in Oldsmar, Florida, UVLrx Therapeutics is dedicated to
evidence-based medicine in the field of light therapy and offers
the first known intravenous, concurrent delivery of Ultraviolet-A
(UVA), RED and GREEN light wavelengths.  

UVLrx Therapeutics filed its voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-07590) on Sept.
7, 2018.  In the petition signed by CEO Michael Harter, the Debtor
disclosed $362,644 in assets and $5,179,373 in liabilities.  Buddy
D. Ford, Esq., at Buddy D. Ford, P.A., represents the Debtor.


UVLRX THERAPEUTICS: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
------------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of UVLrx Therapeutics, Inc. as of Oct. 10,
according to a court docket.

                      About UVLrx Therapeutics

Based in Oldsmar, Florida, UVLrx Therapeutics is dedicated to
evidence-based medicine in the field of light therapy and offers
the first known intravenous, concurrent delivery of Ultraviolet-A
(UVA), RED and GREEN light wavelengths.  

UVLrx Therapeutics filed its voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-07590) on Sept.
7, 2018.  In the petition signed by CEO Michael Harter, the Debtor
disclosed $362,644 in assets and $5,179,373 in liabilities.  Buddy
D. Ford, Esq. at Buddy D. Ford, P.A., represents the Debtor.


VERITAS SOFTWARE: Bank Debt Trades at 3% Off
--------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Veritas Software is
a borrower traded in the secondary market at 97.27
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.25 percentage points from
the previous week. Veritas Software pays 450 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $1.933 billion facility. The bank loan
matures on January 27, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B2' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of
the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated
loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week
ended Friday, September 28.


VERSANT HEALTH: S&P Alters Outlook to Negative & Affirms 'B' ICR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings revised its outlook on Versant Health Holdco
Inc. to negative from stable and affirmed its 'B' long-term issuer
credit rating. S&P said, "We also affirmed all issue ratings,
including our 'B' rating on the company's first-lien credit
facility, consisting of a $75 million revolver due 2022 and $800
million first-lien term loan due 2024. The recovery rating is '3',
indicating our expectation for meaningful (55%) recovery in the
event of a payment default. We also affirmed our 'CCC+' issue-level
and '6' recovery ratings on Versant's $210 million second-lien term
loan due 2025. The '6' recovery rating indicates our expectation
for negligible (0%) recovery in the event of payment default."

S&P said, "Our negative outlook reflects Versant's underperformance
relative to our expectations, resulting in weakened credit
protection measures, including elevated leverage and lower EBITDA
interest coverage.  It also factors in the possibility Versant will
not delever below 7.5x by year-end 2019 and/or will face weakened
coverage below 2.0x during this time period. Versant emerged in
December 2017 through the combination of Davis Vision and Superior
Vision and has faced some integration risks, a slower synergy
realization, and some client losses, resulting in earnings
compression and weaker-than-expected credit metrics through the
first half of 2018. The company also pursued a dividend recap
earlier this year that we believed at the time would be offset by a
new client win; however, this win will now be realized in 2019.
Specifically, leverage as of the last 12 months ended June 30, 2018
is approximately 8.0x, with expectations for leverage to remain in
the mid-to-upper 7.5x-8.0x by year-end 2018.
Additionally, weaker EBITDA interest coverage of about 2.0x at
year-end 2018 could pressure the rating, especially if the company
boosts its debt position in 2019. Due to the uncertainties
surrounding ongoing potential integration and execution risk in
meeting our expectations as it relates to EBITDA and credit
protection metrics in 2019, a heightened downside risk is apparent
and we may reassess Versant's business profile assessment.

"The negative outlook reflects our expectation that we could lower
our ratings during the next 12 months if Versant's business
performance erodes, leading to weaker earnings and credit
protection measures than we anticipate: adjusted debt to EBITDA of
7.5x-8.0x with coverage of roughly 2.0x at year-end 2018 with
leverage improving through 2019 to 7.2x-7.5x and EBITDA coverage in
the low-2.0x range on a sustained basis.

"We could lower our ratings in the next 12 months if Versant's
performance deteriorates due to integration risk, loss of a
substantial customer, or synergies taking longer to be realized
than we expect. In this scenario, EBITDA would decline by 1%-2%
from our base-case projections. This would increase the risk of
higher-than-expected leverage and/or weaker-than-expected EBITDA
interest coverage. Specific triggers that could lead to a downgrade
include financial leverage above 7.5x and EBITDA interest coverage
below 2.0x on a sustained basis. We could also consider a downgrade
if Versant becomes more aggressive with its financial policies so
that debt-financed dividends lead to elevated credit protection
measures above our triggers.

"We could affirm our ratings in the next 12 months if Versant's
business performance and credit protection metrics stabilize with
leverage sustained below 7.5x and EBITDA interest coverage above
2.0x, and the company demonstrates a commitment to maintain these
metrics within our expectations."



VICTOR P. KEARNEY: Ct. Junks Emergency Bid for Stay Pending Appeal
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge David T. Thuma denied Debtor Victor P. Kearney's
emergency motion to stay pending appeal.

By the motion, the Debtor sought a stay pending his appeal of two
related stay relief orders, both concerning a request to have a
state court judge hear certain matters within the state court's
(likely exclusive) jurisdiction before he retires.

Bankruptcy Rule 8005 allows bankruptcy courts to issue stays
pending appeal. Factors to consider include: "(1) whether the stay
applicant has made a strong showing that they are likely to succeed
on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably
injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will
substantially injure the other parties interested in the
proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies." Factors one
and two--likelihood of success and irreparable harm--are the most
critical.

The Court concludes that the Debtor has not carried his burden of
showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits, nor that he
would be irreparably harmed if the motion is denied, nor that
granting the motion would not harm his creditors, nor that the
requested stay would serve the public interest.

Co-trustees of the MPK Trusts Louis and Benny Abruzzo and the
Unsecured Creditors Committee argued during oral argument that,
since the Court terminated exclusivity, the Debtor has worked hard
to thwart a competing plan of reorganization, while at the same
time making only half-hearted efforts to pay his creditors. The
Court is not prepared to accept the argument, but the motion is
consistent with the theory. Whether the Abruzzos and the UCC are
right or wrong about the Debtor's goals and motivations, the Court
wants to get the case moved toward a conclusion as soon as
practicable.

The bankruptcy case is in re: In re: Victor P. Kearney, Debtor, No.
17-12274-t11 (Bankr. D.N.M.).

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Sept. 28, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2QSJ5hR from Leagle.com.

Victor P. Kearney, Debtor, represented by Jason Michael Cline --
jason@attorneyjasoncline.com -- Jason Cline, LLC, Debbie E. Green,
Foley & Lardner LLP, Don F. Harris, Marcus A. Helt --
mhelt@gardere.com -- Foley & Lardner LLP & David Benjamin Thomas,
Reid Collins & Tsai LLP.

United States Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Alice Nystel
Page, Office of the U.S. Trustee.

Unsecured Creditors Committee, Creditor Committee, represented by
Chris W. Pierce, Walker & Associates, P.C. & Thomas D. Walker,
Walker & Associates, P.C.

Victor P. Kearney filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.N.M. Case No. 17-12274) on Sept. 1, 2017 and is
represented by Jason Michael Cline, Esq. of Jason Cline, LLC.


VISITING NURSE: Creditors Panel Hires Marshack Hays as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Visiting Nurse
Association of the Inland Counties, seeks authorization from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of California to retain
Marshack Hays LLP, as counsel to the Committee.

The Committee requires Marshack Hays to:

   (1) advise the Committee with respect to its rights, powers,
       duties and obligations as the official Committee of
       creditors holding unsecured claims of the Debtor's
       bankruptcy case;

   (2) prepare pleadings, applications and conducting
       examinations incidental to administration of this case and
       to protect the interests of the unsecured creditors of
       the Estate;

   (3) advise and represent the Committee in its connection with
       all applications, motions or complaints filed during the
       course of the administration of this case;

   (4) develop the relationship of the Committee with the Debtor
       in the bankruptcy proceeding;

   (5) advise and assist the Committee in presentation with
       respect to any plan of reorganization proposed by the
       Debtor, the Committee, or other entity; and

   (6) take such other action and performing such other services
       as the Committee may require of the Firm in connection
       with the Chapter 11 case.

Marshack Hays will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners             $500 to $630
     Associates           $290 to $400
     Paralegals           $150 to $270

Marshack Hays will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Richard A. Marschack, a partner at Marshack Hays, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not creditors,
equity security holders or insiders of the Debtor; (b) has not
been, within two years before the date of the filing of the
Debtor's chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees of
the Debtor; and (c) does not have an interest materially adverse to
the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or equity
security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship
to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtor, or for any other
reason.

Marshack Hays can be reached at:

     Richard A. Marshack, Esq.
     David A. Wood, Esq.
     MARSHACK HAYS LLP
     870 Roosevelt
     Irvine, CA 92620
     Tel: (949) 333-7777
     Fax: (949) 333-7778
     E-mail: rmarshack@marshackhays.com
             dwood@marshackhays.com

              About Visiting Nurse Association
                   of the Inland Counties

Visiting Nurse Association of the Inland Counties --
http://www.vnacalifornia.org/-- is a not-for-profit organization
that provides health, palliative and hospice services when in-home
care is needed or preferred. It offers a full continuum of care for
patients, including home health, hospice and bereavement services.
The company is headquartered in Riverside, California, with patient
care centers in Palm Desert and Murrieta.

Visiting Nurse Association of the Inland Counties sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-16908) on Aug. 15, 2018.  In the petition signed by Bruce
Gordon, corporate controller, the Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.  

Judge Mark D. Houle presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped The Turoci Firm as its legal counsel.

On Sept. 13, 2018, the U.S. trustee appointed Jerry Seelig as
patient care ombudsman in the Debtor's case.

On September 19, 2018, the United States Trustee filed an
appointment and notice of appointment of committee of unsecured
creditors.  The Committee retained Marshack Hays LLP as counsel.


WALL STREET LANGUAGES: Berkeley Buying ESL/Career Schools for $64K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Wall Street Languages Ltd. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to authorize the private sale of
substantially all assets related to its English as a Second
Language School, Translation Business, and Career School to
Berkeley Language Services, LLC pursuant to (a) an ESL School Asset
Purchase Agreement dated Sept. 18, 2018, and (b) a Career School
Asset Purchase Agreement dated Sept. 18, 2018, to Berkeley Language
Services, LLC for $64,000.

The Debtor fell into financial distress as a result of the prior
downturn in the economy.  Although it survived through the
financial crisis, it left the Debtor in a financially weakened
state with inadequate working capital.

In June 2017, it began searching for a purchaser for its language
school business.  The Debtor entered into a contract with a
business broker who specializes in marketing and selling language
schools, Ricardo Belotti Consultoria Empresarial Ltda.  The Broker
worked diligently to find a buyer.

The Debtor was facing a motion to lift the automatic stay by its
landlord, CP/IPERS Alchemy 43rd Street Owner, LLC, due to
non-payment of post-petition rent related to two leases -- one for
the 19th Floor where the Debtor had its offices, and the other for
the 2nd Floor where the Debtor has its teaching facility and the
3rd Floor where the Debtor sublets to Transperfect.  The Debtor and
its Landlord reached a resolution whereby the Debtor has already
vacated its office space on the 19th Floor.  The Debtor has until
Sept. 30, 2018 to vacate its current teaching space on the 2nd
floor.  There will be an attornment of subtenant Transperfect to
the Landlord thereby avoiding any interruption to Transperfect's
operations.

The Debtor has successfully recovered from the disappointment with
Linden East, LLC, a prospective buyer that pulled out of the deal
immediately prior to the hearing, by negotiating a sale of its
assets to the Purchaser, related to Berkeley College, a well-known
entity in New York.  The Purchaser and the Landlord are discussing
continued occupancy of the 2nd floor teaching space for some period
of time, after which the teaching operations will be moved to the
Berkeley campus.

In light of the Debtor's current financial situation, there is an
urgency to quickly transfer the business assets to a purchaser who
has an accreditation and can provide the students with their
classes that have already been paid for. For the last several weeks
the Debtor, the Broker and the Debtor's counsel have been involved
in arms'-length negotiations with the Purchaser.  The New York
State regulatory agencies have been consulted in depth.  As a
result of regulatory concerns, two asset purchase agreements have
been drafted and signed, subject to Court approval.

The sale of the English as a Second Language School and the
Translation business is addressed in the ESL APA.  The sale of the
Career School is addressed in the Career APA.

A copy of the APAs attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Wall_Street_37_Sales.pdf

The Debtor asks to consummate an immediate private sale to the
Purchaser.  Without an immediate private sale, it will be forced to
vacate its teaching facilities and cease operating on Sept. 30,
2018.  The private sale will save employee jobs, protect the
students from being deported, provide the students with class
instruction in many circumstances that they already paid for (which
obligations are being assumed by the Purchaser under the APAs), and
provide a temporary tenant for the 2nd floor while the Landlord
continues
to market the space.

Additionally, many local businesses benefit from the continued
operation of the language school, (including approximately 50% of
the Debtor’s creditors), in the form of students needing
residential accommodations, food and entertainment, homestays, and
name of the students go on to attend colleges and universities
across the United States.

In addition to saving the jobs of many of the employees, the
Purchaser has offered to retain Cesar Rennert, who has run this
business for 45 years, to assist in the smooth transition of the
business operations.  Mr Rennert will work for the Purchaser and
receive a salary.

The Debtor asks approval to sell the Assets of the English as a
Second Language School to the Purchaser on these terms and
conditions:

     Seller: Wall Street Languages, Ltd.

     Purchaser: Berkeley Language Services, LLC

     Purchase Price:  $32,000 of which $2,000 is earmarked for the
Consumer Privacy Policy Ombudsman.  Payable $10,000 deposit to the
Debtor's counsel, balance due at closing.

     Assumed Liabilities consisting of: (i) deferred compensation
not to exceed $17,500 to cover outstanding payroll liability due to
Eimear Harrison, which will be paid no later than 15 days after
Closing; (ii) teachout and teaching obligations for all Seller's
New York students for which the Purchaser is authorized to teach
following the Closing; and (iii) all liabilities of Seller under
any Transferred Contracts (including all Cure Costs), but such Cure
Costs will not exceed $12,000 in the aggregate.

     Acquired Assets: At the closing of the Acquisition, the
Purchaser would purchase from the Debtor, and the Debtor would sell
to the Purchaser, all of its right, title and interest, if any, in
and to all assets associated with the Business: all of Seller's
assets relating to its ESL School and translation and international
services located at 211 E. 43rd Street, New York, NY 10017 or
stored at Berkeley College's Newark campus located at 536 Broad
Street, Newark, NJ 07102.

     Representations and Warranties; Covenants: The representations
and warranties and covenants are customary for a transaction of
this type, including, without limitation, representations and
warranties regarding the authority to enter into the sale
transaction and the agreement to abide by all laws with respect to
the sale, litigation, material contracts, permits, environmental
matter, ownership of Property, taxes and condition of the Property,
the best efforts of the parties, notices and consents, access to
information and the risk of loss.

     Closing Date: The closing will take place at the offices of
DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, no later than
Oct. 31, 2018.

The Debtor asks approval to sell the Assets of the Career School to
the Purchaser on these terms and conditions:

     Seller: Wall Street Languages, Ltd.

     Purchaser: Berkeley Language Services, LLC

     Purchase Price: $32,000 of which $2,000 is earmarked for the
Consumer Privacy Policy Ombudsman.  Payable $10,000 deposit to
Debtor's counsel, balance due at closing.

     Assumed Liabilities consisting of: (i) eferred compensation
not to exceed $17,500 to cover outstanding payroll liability due to
Eimear Harrison, which will be paid no later than 15 days after
Closing; (ii) teachout and teaching obligations for all the
Seller's New York students for which Purchaser is authorized to
teach following the Closing; (iii) refunds that may be due as
required by policy guidance on transfers of ownership of licensed
private career schools; and (iv) all liabilities of Seller under
any Transferred Contracts (including all Cure Costs, to the extent
provided herein), but such Cure Costs will not exceed $12,000 in
the aggregate.

     Acquired Assets: At the closing of the Acquisition, the
Purchaser would purchase from the Debtor, and the Debtor would sell
to the Purchaser, all of its right, title and interest, if any, in
and to all assets relating to the Seller's licensed private career
school located at 211 E. 43rd Street, New York, NY 10017 or stored
at Berkeley College's Newark campus located at 536 Broad Street,
Newark, NJ 07102.

     Representations and Warranties; Covenants: The representations
and warranties and covenants are customary for a transaction of
this type, including, without limitation, representations and
warranties regarding the authority to enter into the sale
transaction and the agreement to abide by all laws with respect to
the sale, litigation, material contracts, permits, environmental
matter, ownership of Property, taxes and condition of the Property,
the best efforts of the parties, notices and consents, access to
information and the risk of loss.

     Closing Date: The closing will take place at the offices of
DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP, no later than
Oct. 31, 2018.

Pursuant to the APAs, the Purchaser will acquire, and the Debtor
will convey by private sale, all of the right, title and interest
that Debtor possesses as of the Closing in and to the Assets free
and clear of all liens, claims, interests, obligations and
encumbrances whatsoever.  In consideration of the sale of the
Assets covered by the APAs, the Purchaser will pay the total
Purchase Price $64,000 (of which $4,000 is earmarked for the
Consumer Privacy Policy Ombudsman) at Closing and assume various
liabilities of the Debtor.

Time is of the essence and critical in closing on a sale of the
Debtor's assets, as the administrative expenses of the Chapter 11
Case continue to accrue and there are insufficient funds to pay
them.  It is extremely unlikely that an overbid process will
generate higher and better offers for the Debtor's assets.

In connection with, and ancillary to, the Debtor's request for
approval of the APAs, the Debtor asks authority to assume and
assign its interest in the following Leases, subject to
modification as agreed between the Purchaser and Landlord which the
Debtor understands is currently being negotiated.  The Landlords
will not receive cure amounts but may file administrative claims
for any post-petition arrears and general unsecured claims for any
prepetition arrears in such amount to be allowed by the Court, or
otherwise agreed upon between the Debtor and the landlords, and the
Leases will be deemed in full force and effect and free of any
defaults or purported termination thereunder.

These Leases include, subject to further direction by Purchaser:
Student Housing Lease #1. Between Hillside Parsons LLC for the
premises located at 202 East 110th Street, New York, NY 10017
Apartments 6A and 6B; Student Housing Lease #2. Between 44th Street
idtown Holdings LLC c/o Dalan Management for the premises located
at 230 East 44th Street, New York, NY 10017, Penthouse E and Apt.
10A; Student Housing Lease #3. Between The Chetrit Group, doing
business as 1760 Third Owner LLC as landlord and the Debtor as
tenant for certain student room blocks located at 1760 Third
Avenue, New York, NY; and Student Housing Lease #4. Between AKA
United Nations Luxury Apartments as landlord and the Debtor as
tenant for reservation number 543823 for the premises located at
234 East 46th Street, New York, NY.

The Debtor has been working with the Broker pursuant to a Services
Agreement dated June 27, 2017.  It asks to retain the Broker.  The
Broker's employment is necessary and in the best interest of the
Debtor and its estate.  The Broker will be paid for the legal
services rendered upon application duly filed with the Court.
Pursuant to the Broker Agreement the Broker would be entitled to
its minimum success fee ($150,000) minus the total monthly payments
made under the Broker Agreement ($48,000 paid so far), amounting to
a total due of $102,000, which would be an administrative claim in
the estate.

The Purchaser:

          BERKELEY LANGUAGE SERVICES, LLC
          3 E. 43rd Street
          New York, NY 10017

                About Wall Street Languages

Wall Street Languages Ltd. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-11581) on May 24,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The
Debtor hired DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkehr, LLP,
as its legal counsel.


WAYNE BAILEY: Court Allows Objection to Scott Farms' PACA Claim
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse entered an order allowing
Debtor Wayne Bailey, Inc.'s objection to the Perishable
Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) Claim of Scott Farms, Inc.

Scott Farms timely filed a PACA proof of claim on April 16, 2018,
Claim No. 87-1. In the Proof of Claim, Scott Farms initially
asserted a claim in the amount of $154,031.47 and contended that
this full amount was entitled to statutory trust protection
pursuant to PACA. In the objection, the debtor contended that
several of the invoices attached to Scott Farms' Proof of Claim
listed payment terms that exceeded the statutory maximum.

Although the Objection originally disputed the PACA eligibility of
Scott Farms' entire claim, the parties agreed to an allowed PACA
claim in the amount of $39,000, to which a setoff in the amount of
$33,183 will be applied. Remaining for the court's determination is
the PACA eligibility of two invoices: (1) Invoice #21729 in the
amount of $77,998 and (2) Invoice # 21730 in the amount of
$38,400.

In this case, Invoice #21729 is dated Oct. 27, 2017, but represents
potato pack outs from September 15 to September 19, 2017. Invoice
#21730 is dated Oct. 30, 2017 and represents pack outs from
September 22 to October 10, 2017. No other invoices representing
those pack outs were introduced into evidence by either party, and
no pack out slips were introduced into evidence. Scott Farms
contends that default occurred when it was not paid in full upon
the expiration of the parties' known payment term following pack
outs of the potatoes. Assuming that the parties' oral agreement for
a 30-day payment term applies, Scott Farms alleges that payment in
full on the potatoes was due on October 15, October 16, October 18,
October 19, October 22, October 28, November 2, and November 9, and
that Wayne Bailey was in default when it did not remit full payment
on those dates, i.e. thirty days after each respective pack out.

Based on the listed dates, Scott Farms contends that an email
exchange between the parties dated November 6, 2017 constitutes a
valid post-default agreement. The email is from Kim Scott, Office
Manager of Scott Farms, to Linda Gore, the Accounts Payable Clerk
at Wayne Bailey. In the emails, the parties discuss amounts owed to
each other and allegedly agree to extend payment terms to November
20, 2017. The timing of this email exchange, when compared to the
invoice dates, is suspect. No party introduced evidence that Wayne
Bailey knew what amounts it owed Scott Farms until the October 27
and October 30 invoices were delivered. In short, the invoice
evidence does not support Scott Farms' position that the November
20, 2017 due date noted on the Disputed Invoices represents a
post-default agreement. The existence of a post-default agreement
between the parties therefore has not been proven by Scott Farms.

In this case, there was no written agreement to alter the payment
terms. Rather, only an oral agreement to a 30-day payment term
existed between the parties. However, this 30-day term clearly and
directly conflicts with the "Net Due November 20, 2017" term listed
on the invoices in question. The fact that the agreement between
the parties to extend the payment term to thirty days was oral,
rather than written, should not change the outcome. Id. Where
parties' agreed-upon payment terms and listed invoice payment terms
conflict, and when those payment terms exceed the 30-day maximum,
PACA trust eligibility is invalidated.

For these reasons, the Objection of the debtor to the PACA claim of
Scott Farms is allowed. Scott Farms will have an allowed PACA claim
in the amount of $39,000, subject to a setoff by the debtor in the
amount of $33,184. Scott Farms will also have an allowed general
unsecured claim in the amount of $116,398.

The bankruptcy case is in re: WAYNE BAILEY, INC. Chapter 11,
Debtor, Case No. 18-00284-5-SWH (Bankr. E.D.N.C.).

A copy of the Court's Order dated Sept. 28, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2CcMN1D from Leagle.com.

Wayne Bailey, Inc., Debtor, represented by Laurie B. Biggs, Stubbs
& Perdue, PA, Gregory B. Crampton, Nicholls & Crampton, P.A.,
Joseph Zachary Frost, Stubbs & Perdue, P.A. & Trawick H. Stubbs,
Jr., Stubbs & Perdue, P.A.

About Wayne Bailey, Inc.

Wayne Bailey, Inc., grows, packs, and ships sweet potatoes for
foodservice, retail, fresh cut, processing, and international
markets worldwide.  It also offers processed sweet potatoes,
including shreds, sticks, diced, sliced (with or without skin),
slabs (with or without skin), crinkle-cut slabs (with or without
skin), and whole peeled and puree (chilled or frozen) sweet
potatoes.  The company was founded in 1935 and is headquartered in
Chadbourn, North Carolina.  It has facilities in North Carolina,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.

Wayne Bailey filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on (Bankr.
E.D.N.C. Case No. 18-00284) on January 21, 2018, listing its
estimated assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50 million
respectively. The petition was signed by George G. Wooten,
president.

Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse presides over the case.


WESTMORELAND COAL: Moody's Lowers CFR to C on Bankr. Filing
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Westmoreland Coal Company's
Probability of Default Rating to D-PD from Caa3-PD. Moody's also
downgraded the company's Corporate Family Rating to C from Caa3 and
all instrument ratings to C from Ca. The downgrade was prompted by
the company's announcement that it voluntarily filed for relief
under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on October 9,
2018. The Speculative Grade Liquidity rating is unchanged at SGL-4.
The outlook is stable. Subsequent to the actions, Moody's will
withdraw all ratings.

Downgrades:

Issuer: Westmoreland Coal Company

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to D-PD from Caa3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to C from Caa3

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Downgraded to C (LGD5) from
Ca (LGD4)

Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Downgraded to C (LGD5) from
Ca (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Westmoreland Coal Company

Outlook, Remains Stable

Unchanged:

Issuer: Westmoreland Coal Company

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Unchanged at SGL-4

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade follows the announcement that both Westmoreland and
its affiliate Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP have filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas, Houston Division. Canadian operations are not
included in the filings. Management believes that liquidity from
operations combined with the Company's Debtor-In-Possession
financing (unrated) is sufficient to continue operating its mines
in the normal course of business, without any expected impact to
current output levels, though in its view the ultimate impact of
the filings remains unclear.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Mining
published in September 2018.

Westmoreland Coal Company, headquartered in Englewood, Colorado,
produces sub-bituminous coal and lignite for sale to electric power
plants located near their mines. Westmoreland operates twelve
surface coal mines selling about 50 million tons of coal per year,
with half coming from Western United States, and another half from
Canada. The company also operates an underground bituminous coal
mine in Ohio (acquired in January of 2015), a char production
facility and two coal-fired power generating units. The company is
a 94% owner of WMLP (formerly Oxford Resource Partners LP), which
is a stand-alone, publicly-traded master limited partnership (MLP)
providing Westmoreland with a platform to implement a drop-down
strategy of certain U.S. and Canadian coal assets into a MLP
structure. For the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, the company
generated $1.3 billion in revenues.


WINDSTREAM CORP: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
-------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Windstream
Corporation is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 95.03
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, September 28,
2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM
Pricing. This represents an increase of 1.46 percentage points from
the previous week. Windstream Corporation pays 425 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $747 million facility. The bank
loan matures on March 29, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of
the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated
loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week
ended Friday, September 28.


WYNN RESORTS: Moody's Rates $400MM Term Loan B 'Ba3', Outlook Neg.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to Wynn Resorts,
Limited's $400 million 6-year term loan B. At the same time,
Moody's affirmed WYNN's Ba3 Corporate Family Rating, Ba3-PD
Probability of Default Rating, along with the company's subsidiary
issuers Ba2 senior secured debt and B1 senior unsecured debt
ratings, and SGL-1 Speculative Grade Liquidity rating. WYNN's
rating outlook remains negative.

Proceeds from proposed term loan can be used for general corporate
purposes, including capital expenditures, share repurchases and/or
investments in subsidiaries.

"The Ba3 rating assigned to WYNN'S term loan B considers that
despite its structural subordination to WYNN's primary operating
subsidiaries -- Wynn America, LLC, Wynn Las Vegas, LLC and Wynn
Macau, Limited, each of which has its own credit structure -- the
term loan B is secured by an equity interest in the intermediate
holding companies that own these operating subsidiaries," stated
Keith Foley, a Senior Vice President at Moody's.

"The management and license fees paid to Wynn Resorts, Limited from
these operating subsidiaries, will be the primary source of cash
flow that will service the $400 million term loan B," added Foley.


WYNN's leverage increases slightly on a pro forma basis, although
it does not have an impact on the rating. Pro forma Moody's
adjusted debt/EBITDA on a gross basis increases to 5.2 times from
5.0 times. On a net debt basis and applying 50% of pro forma cash
to the net debt calculation, Moody's adjusted net debt/EBITDA
increases to 4.7 times from 4.6 times.

Subject to applicable gaming laws and approvals, the new term loan
B will be secured by perfected first priority pledges of all of
Wynn Resorts, Limited's equity interest of each of Wynn Group Asia,
Inc. and Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC. Wynn Resorts Holdings, LLC.
and Wynn Group Asia, Inc. will guaranty the new term loan B.
However, the new term loan B will not be secured by the tangible
assets or cash flow of Wynn America, LLC, Wynn Las Vegas, LLC and
Wynn Macau, Limited.

Assignments:

Issuer: Wynn Resorts, Limited

Senior Secured Term Loan, Assigned Ba3 (LGD4)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Wynn America, LLC

Senior Secured Term Loans, Affirmed Ba2 (LGD2)

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facilities, Affirmed Ba2 (LGD2)

Issuer: Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B1 (LGD5)

Issuer: Wynn Macau, Limited

Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed B1 (LGD5)

Issuer: Wynn Resorts, Limited

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba3-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-1

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba3

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Wynn Resorts, Limited

Outlook, Remains Negative

RATINGS RATIONALE

WYNN's credit profile (Ba3 negative) is supported by the quality,
popularity, and favorable reputation of the company's resort
properties -- a factor that continues to distinguish it from most
other gaming operators. The ratings also consider the favorable
prospects for the company's resort in Everett, MA, a suburb near
Boston that will improve the company's geographic diversification.
Moody's believes this resort will ramp up well initially and
perform strongly over the long term given the favorable
demographics, visitation trends, and population concentration of
the Boston area.

Key credit concerns include WYNN's limited diversification despite
the fact that it is one of the largest U.S. gaming operators in
terms of revenue. WYNN's revenue and cash flow are heavily
concentrated in the Macau gaming market. Moody's also expects that
WYNN will be presented with and pursue other large, high profile,
integrated resort development opportunities around the world. As a
result there will likely be periods where the company's leverage
experiences periods of increases due to partially debt-financed,
future development projects.

WYNN's negative rating outlook considers that an investigation is
still underway regarding the suitability with respect to WYNN's
gaming licenses. An independent special committee was appointed by
the company's Board of Directors to investigate allegations of
inappropriate personal conduct by its former Chairman and CEO as
well as perform a comprehensive review of the company's internal
policies and procedures. On August 3, 2018, WYNN's Board of
Directors received the final presentation from the Special
Committee, which was provided to gaming regulators in Massachusetts
and Nevada. Both states are currently reviewing these matters,
including suitability with respect to WYNN and its related
licensees. The gaming regulator in Macau is also monitoring and
reviewing the situation.

The outlook could be revised to stable if the investigations
provide enough independent tangible evidence available that
suggests WYNN will be able to maintain its Nevada, Macau, and
Massachusetts gaming licenses in good standing. Ratings could be
downgraded if WYNN's ability to maintain any of its gaming licenses
is impaired and/or Moody's adjusted net debt/EBITDA rises above 6.0
times for any reason. An upgrade would require that Wynn
demonstrate the ability and willingness to maintain net debt/EBITDA
below 5.0 times along.

Wynn Resorts, Limited, is a developer, owner and operator of
integrated casino resorts. In the Macau Special Administrative
Region of the People's Republic of China, the company owns
approximately 72% of Wynn Macau, Limited, which includes the
operations of the Wynn Macau and Wynn Palace resorts. In Las Vegas,
Nevada, the company operates and, with the exception of certain
retail space, owns 100% of Wynn Las Vegas. Consolidated net revenue
for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2018 was about $6.49
billion.


WYNN RESORTS: S&P Assigns BB- Rating on New $400MM Sec. Term Loan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level rating and '3'
recovery rating to Las Vegas-based casino owner and operator Wynn
Resorts Ltd.'s proposed $400 million senior secured term loan due
in 2024. The '3' recovery rating indicates S&P's expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%) recovery for lenders in
the event of a payment default.

Wynn expects to use the proceeds for general corporate purposes,
including repurchases of its stock, investments in subsidiaries,
and/or capital expenditures.

The loan will be secured by perfected first-priority pledges of
Wynn Resorts' equity interests in the guarantors, including Wynn
Group Asia Inc. and Wynn Resorts Holdings LLC, subject to
applicable gaming laws and approvals. Wynn Group Asia and Wynn
Resorts Holdings' primary assets include license and management
agreements with each of their casino operating subsidiaries and
intellectual property, including the Wynn trademarks and trade
name. The loan is structurally subordinated to all debt at Wynn's
casino operating subsidiaries and relies on the management and
licensing fee stream paid to the guarantors for debt service.

S&P said, "Additionally, we view the term loan's security package
as weak because it is an equity pledge, as opposed to an asset
pledge. In our view, the pledge of the guarantors' equity adds no
meaningful incremental protection to lenders that the guarantees
don't already provide. As a result, we consider the secured term
loan to be effectively unsecured, and we therefore cap our recovery
rating at '3' and recovery prospects at 50%-70%.

"We expect the transaction to modestly increase Wynn's consolidated
net leverage about 0.2x to the low-4x area from our previous 4x
forecast. However, this represents a sizable cushion relative to
our 6x downgrade threshold. Notwithstanding our expectation that
Wynn will maintain a significant cushion to our downgrade
threshold, our rating outlook is negative because of continued
uncertainty surrounding ongoing investigations, especially those by
the Massachusetts Gaming Commission and Nevada Gaming Control
Board. We believe that management, board, and ownership changes in
recent months meaningfully reduce but do not eliminate the risks of
an unfavorable outcome from one of these investigations. As a
result, we are unlikely to revise the outlook to stable until we
can assess the outcome of regulatory reviews and potential
impairment, if any, to Wynn's ability to maintain gaming licenses
in its various markets.

"However, because we forecast Wynn's leverage in the low-4x area,
we could consider raising the rating if the investigations are
resolved in a satisfactory manner. This could happen if we were
confident that the company would sustain sufficient cushion
compared to our 5x upgrade threshold to absorb potential future
operating volatility, a possible investment to renew its Macau
concession, or additional development spending needs without
sustaining leverage above that threshold."

Key analytical factors:

S&P said, "While our estimated recovery on the term loan indicates
a recovery rating of '1' (90%-100% recovery expectation), we capped
the recovery rating at '3' (50%-70%) because of the rating cap that
we apply to debt we deem as effectively unsecured for issuers with
issuer credit ratings in the 'BB' category. The cap addresses the
fact that these creditors' recovery prospects are at greater risk
of being impaired by the issuance of additional priority or pari
passu debt before default.

"Our simulated default scenario for Wynn Resorts contemplates a
payment default in 2022 (in line with our average four-year default
assumption for 'BB-' rated credits), reflecting some combination of
the following factors: a severe and prolonged global recession that
impairs cash flow across the portfolio of properties, the
unexpected loss of the Macau concession, and/or the inability to
distribute cash out of Wynn Macau. We understand that under the
terms of the Wynn Macau credit agreement, Wynn Macau can pay
license and management fees to the parent as long as no default is
ongoing or would result from the payment. In a default scenario,
its ability to make these payments would be restricted.

"Our estimated EBITDA at emergence for Wynn Resorts reflects
significant uncertainty about the fee stream and the value that
lenders would realize in a default scenario. As a result, we
applied a 50% discount to our forecast three-year average license
and management fees. In our simulated default scenario, we assume
that licensing and management fees paid to Wynn Resorts by its
subsidiaries would be meaningfully impaired because of weaker
operating performance at the subsidiaries, coupled with a possible
renegotiation of the fee stream in a default scenario. In addition
to payment restrictions on management and license fees in the Macau
credit agreement, we believe creditors may have incentives to
renegotiate or possibly reject these agreements. However, we
believe the brand would still have sufficient value and lenders
would elect to renegotiate these agreements to pay less to avoid
disruptions in operations. We value the license and management fee
stream using a 13.5% capitalization rate (about a 7.5x multiple),
similar to our enterprise valuation multiples for Wynn Las Vegas
and Wynn America.

"Because Wynn Resorts does not guarantee its operating
subsidiaries' debt, we assume that any residual value at the parent
is not available to support recovery at those subsidiaries."

Simulated default assumptions:

-- Simulated year of default: 2022
-- EBITDA at emergence: About $116 million
-- Capitalization rate (implied EV multiple): 13.5% (7.5x)
-- Gross EV: About $863 million

Simplified waterfall:

-- Net EV after administrative expenses (5%): $820 million
-- Obligor/nonobligor valuation split: 100%/0%
-- Estimated value available for senior secured claims: $820
million
-- Estimated senior secured debt claims: $397 million
    --Recovery expectation: capped at 50%-70% (rounded estimate:
65%)
All debt amounts include six months of prepetition interest.

  RATINGS LIST

  Ratings Unchanged
  Wynn Resorts Ltd.
   Issuer Credit Rating          BB-/Negative/--

  New Rating
  Wynn Resorts Ltd.
   Senior Secured
    $400mil term loan due 2024   BB-
     Recovery Rating             3 (65%)



YOU'RE PUTTING: Carson-Meyer Offers $40K for All Business Assets
----------------------------------------------------------------
You're Putting Me On, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of all
business assets to Carson-Meyer, LLC for $40,000 cash, subject to
overbid.

The business assets include all assets (tangible and intangible),
including all of the rights, titles, ownership interests, naming
rights, fictitious names, copyrights, software, fixtures,
furniture, electronic equipment, equipment, supplies, and inventory
owned by the Debtor, including all personal property owned by the
Debtor and used in connection with the operation of the business.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Assets to the Buyer free and clear
of any liens, claims and encumbrances of the Respondents.
Carson-Meyer is owned by Frank Meyer, who owns 40% of the Debtor,
and is the husband of Linda Meyer, President of the Debtor and 60%
owner.

Carson-Meyer's offer is further subject to these conditions:

     a. Carson-Meyer deposit $5,000 with Brian C. Thompson, the
counsel to the Debtor, which will be placed in his firm's escrow
account.

     b. The Debtor agrees that, effective as of the date of the
present motion and until the Closing Date, the business assets will
be kept in "as is" condition and that all acts required with
respect to any portion of the business assets will be made in order
to correct any violations of which Debtor will receive written
notice after the Effective Date from any governmental body having
jurisdiction over the business assets and in order to allow Debtor
to deliver the business assets to Purchaser in the same condition
as exists on the date hereof.

     c. The business assets will be conveyed to Carson-Meyer with
good and marketable title, and will be free and clear of any liens,
encumbrances and claims to the fullest extent allowable by the
Bankruptcy Court.

     d. The Hand Money Deposit will be applicable to the Purchase
Price at Closing.

In the event that the Court approves Carson-Meyer's offer, the
Buyer will waive its claim for reimbursement of funds expended in
its investigation of the Property during the Feasibility Period.
The administrative expenses in the amount of $10,000 are to be paid
directly to all allowed administrative claimants from the sales
proceeds.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon reasonable notice to the
Debtor, Carson-Meyer elect to close at any time after the Order
approving the sale of the business assets becomes a final and
non-appealable Order.

The Debtor previously filed a Motion to Approve Bidding Procedures,
which was approved by court order on June 11, 2018.  The Bidding
Procedures Motion and the Order of Court approving bidding
procedures and other matters related to the sales process will be
posted on the Court's EASI website at
http://www.pawb.uscourts.gov/

                  About You're Putting Me On

Headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, You're Putting Me On,
Inc., d/b/a Hometowne Sports filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-21720) on April 26, 2017,
estimating its assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities at
between„ $500,001 and $1 million.  Brian C. Thompson, Esq., at
Thompson Law Group, P.C., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


YUMA ENERGY: Defaults Under Its 2016 Credit Agreement
-----------------------------------------------------
Yuma Energy, Inc., received on Oct. 9, 2018, a notice of event of
default under the credit agreement and reservation of rights from
the Societe Generale, as administrative agent and issuing bank,
under the Credit Agreement dated Oct. 26, 2016 and as amended on
May 19, 2017, May 8, 2018 and July 31, 2018, mong the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries, the Administrative Agent, and the
lenders and guarantors, advising that an event of default has
occurred and continues to exist under Section 6.1(d) of the Credit
Agreement by reason of the Company's noncompliance with the
liquidity covenant requiring the Company to maintain cash and cash
equivalents of at least $4.0 million.  As a result of the default,
the lenders may accelerate the $35.0 million outstanding balance
under the Credit Agreement and the lenders thereunder may increase
the applicable interest rate under the Credit Agreement by 2.0% per
annum.  As of Oct. 12, 2018, the lenders have neither accelerated
the outstanding amount nor increased the applicable interest but
may do so in the future.

The Notice advises the Company that the Administrative Agent
retains and expressly reserves all rights and remedies to which it
or any lender may be entitled under the Credit Agreement, including
the right to accelerate and declare the loans under the Credit
Agreement to be due and payable and to foreclose on the collateral
subject to the Credit Agreement.

The Notice further advises the Company that (i) none of the
Administrative Agent or the lenders has waived, intends to waive,
or does waive any event of default, or any other current or future
default or event of default that may now or hereafter exist, (ii)
any forbearance from the exercise of any rights and other remedies
by the Administrative Agent or the lenders under the Credit
Agreement with respect to any of the events of default are not to
be construed as a waiver thereof and the Administrative Agent and
the lenders reserved their rights to invoke all such rights and
remedies at any time the Administrative Agent and the lenders deem
appropriate in respect thereof, in accordance with the Credit
Agreement and without further notice, (iii) the Administrative
Agent and the lenders reserve the right to identify and assert
additional events of default that may now exist or hereafter arise,
and (iv) nothing in the Notice constitutes or be deemed to
constitute, a modification of, or waiver under the Credit
Agreement, or the acceptance of an event of default, occurrence or
circumstance that may constitute an event of default under the
Credit Agreement.

The Company intends to commence discussions with the lenders under
the Credit Agreement concerning a forbearance agreement or waiver
of the event of default; however, there can be no assurance that
the Company and the lenders will come to any agreement (either oral
or written) regarding a forbearance or waiver of the event of
default.

                        About Yuma Energy

Yuma Energy, Inc. -- http://www.yumaenergyinc.com/-- is an
independent Houston-based exploration and production company
focused on acquiring, developing and exploring for conventional and
unconventional oil and natural gas resources.  Historically, the
Company's operations have focused on onshore properties located in
central and southern Louisiana and southeastern Texas where it has
a long history of drilling, developing and producing both oil and
natural gas assets.  More recently, the Company has begun acquiring
acreage in Yoakum County, Texas, with plans to explore and develop
oil and natural gas assets in the Permian Basin.  The Company has
operated positions in Kern County, California, and non-operated
positions in the East Texas Woodbine and the Bakken Shale in North
Dakota.  Its common stock is listed on the NYSE American under the
trading symbol "YUMA."

Yuma incurred a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$6.80 million in 2017 following a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $42.65 million in 2016.  As of June 30, 2018, the
Company had $89.70 million in total assets, $48.25 million in total
current liabilities, $11.69 million in total other non-current
liabilities and $29.75 million in total equity.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 8 to 12, 2018
---------------------------------------------------------
  Company                   Ticker   Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                   ------   ------ ---------   --------
Acosta Inc                  ACOSTA    7.750    35.062  10/1/2022
Acosta Inc                  ACOSTA    7.750    35.144  10/1/2022
Alpha Appalachia
  Holdings LLC              ANR       3.250     2.048   8/1/2015
American Tire
  Distributors Inc          ATD      10.250    24.007   3/1/2022
American Tire
  Distributors Inc          ATD      10.250    24.877   3/1/2022
Appvion Inc                 APPPAP    9.000     1.125   6/1/2020
Appvion Inc                 APPPAP    9.000     1.005   6/1/2020
BPZ Resources Inc           BPZR      6.500     3.017   3/1/2015
BPZ Resources Inc           BPZR      6.500     3.017   3/1/2049
Bon-Ton Department
  Stores Inc/The            BONT      8.000    15.000  6/15/2021
Cenveo Corp                 CVO       6.000    27.750   8/1/2019
Cenveo Corp                 CVO       8.500     1.461  9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                 CVO       6.000     1.111  5/15/2024
Cenveo Corp                 CVO       8.500     1.461  9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                 CVO       6.000    25.815   8/1/2019
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority     CHUKCH    9.750    70.000  5/30/2020
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority     CHUKCH   10.250    70.000  5/30/2020
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       9.000    64.250  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       6.125    64.750  3/15/2020
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       9.000    62.447  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       7.750     6.032   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       9.000    54.187  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       7.750     6.032   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc         CLE       6.125    62.000  3/15/2020
Community Choice
  Financial Inc             CCFI     10.750    71.128   5/1/2019
Community Choice
  Financial Inc             CCFI     12.750    60.500   5/1/2020
Community Choice
  Financial Inc             CCFI     12.750    60.500   5/1/2020
DBP Holding Corp            DBPHLD    7.750    45.398 10/15/2020
DBP Holding Corp            DBPHLD    7.750    45.398 10/15/2020
EXCO Resources Inc          XCOO      8.500    16.000  4/15/2022
Egalet Corp                 EGLT      5.500    10.375   4/1/2020
Emergent Capital Inc        EMGC      8.500    83.200  2/15/2019
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc               ENER      3.000     7.875  6/15/2013
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc          TXU       9.750    37.125 10/15/2019
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc   FLTW     14.000     3.557 12/15/2011
Homer City Generation LP    HOMCTY    8.137    38.750  10/1/2019
Las Vegas Monorail Co       LASVMC    5.500     4.037  7/15/2019
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       5.000     3.326   2/7/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       2.070     3.326  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.500     3.326  3/29/2013
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.383     3.326  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       2.000     3.326   3/3/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       4.000     3.326  4/30/2009
Lehman Brothers
  Holdings Inc              LEH       1.600     3.326  11/5/2011
Lehman Brothers Inc         LEH       7.500     1.226   8/1/2026
MModal Inc                  MODL     10.750     6.125  8/15/2020
Mashantucket Western
  Pequot Tribe              MASHTU    7.350    16.500   7/1/2026
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC          MPO      10.750     0.831  10/1/2020
Morgan Stanley              MS        6.372   100.450 10/14/2018
Nine West Holdings Inc      JNY       6.125    20.000 11/15/2034
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC        OMX       5.540     4.864  1/29/2020
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc   OREXQ     2.750     5.125  12/1/2020
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc   OREXQ     2.750     5.125  12/1/2020
PaperWorks Industries Inc   PAPWRK    9.500    53.758  8/15/2019
PaperWorks Industries Inc   PAPWRK    9.500    53.758  8/15/2019
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc              PTX       4.250    43.032   4/1/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc              PTX       4.250    43.032   4/1/2021
PetroQuest Energy Inc       PQUE     10.000    43.000  2/15/2021
PetroQuest Energy Inc       PQUE     10.000    42.500  2/15/2021
PetroQuest Energy Inc       PQUE     10.000    42.500  2/15/2021
Powerwave Technologies Inc  PWAV      2.750     0.133  7/15/2041
Powerwave Technologies Inc  PWAV      3.875     0.133  10/1/2027
Powerwave Technologies Inc  PWAV      1.875     0.133 11/15/2024
Powerwave Technologies Inc  PWAV      3.875     0.133  10/1/2027
Powerwave Technologies Inc  PWAV      1.875     0.133 11/15/2024
Renco Metals Inc            RENCO    11.500    29.000   7/1/2003
Rex Energy Corp             REXX      8.000    27.800  10/1/2020
Rex Energy Corp             REXX      6.250    15.625   8/1/2022
Rex Energy Corp             REXX      8.875    17.204  12/1/2020
Rex Energy Corp             REXX      8.000    27.338  10/1/2020
Rolta LLC                   RLTAIN   10.750    15.639  5/16/2018
SandRidge Energy Inc        SD        7.500     0.385  2/15/2023
Sears Holdings Corp         SHLD      8.000    11.728 12/15/2019
Sempra Texas Holdings Corp  TXU       5.550    11.673 11/15/2014
SiTV LLC / SiTV
  Finance Inc               NUVOTV   10.375    58.052   7/1/2019
SiTV LLC / SiTV
  Finance Inc               NUVOTV   10.375    58.052   7/1/2019
Tennessee Valley Authority  TVA       1.750    99.407 10/15/2018
TerraVia Holdings Inc       TVIA      5.000     4.644  10/1/2019
TerraVia Holdings Inc       TVIA      6.000     4.644   2/1/2018
Tesla Energy
  Operations Inc/DE         SCTY      2.650    78.974  11/5/2018
Toys R Us - Delaware Inc    TOY       8.750     3.207   9/1/2021
Transworld Systems Inc      TSIACQ    9.500    50.040  8/15/2021
Transworld Systems Inc      TSIACQ    9.500    25.948  8/15/2021
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      8.500     0.834  4/15/2021
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      9.875     0.834 12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      9.875     0.834 12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc           WLTG      9.875     0.834 12/15/2020
Washington Mutual Bank /
  Debt not acquired
  by JPMorgan               WAMU      5.550     0.602  6/16/2010
Westmoreland Coal Co        WLBA      8.750    29.000   1/1/2022
Westmoreland Coal Co        WLBA      8.750    27.125   1/1/2022
iHeartCommunications Inc    IHRT     14.000    12.750   2/1/2021
iHeartCommunications Inc    IHRT     14.000    12.117   2/1/2021
iHeartCommunications Inc    IHRT      9.000    74.000 12/15/2019
iHeartCommunications Inc    IHRT     14.000    12.117   2/1/2021



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***