/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180716.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, July 16, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 196

                            Headlines

66 ON 66 BAR & GRILL: Gets Nod on Interim Cash Collateral Use
ABENGOA KANSAS: Drivetrain Bid for Stay Pending Appeal Tossed
ACUSPORT CORP: Taps Scott L. Braum as Special Counsel
AGROKOR D.D.: Chapter 15 Case Summary
ALVIN LO OPTOMETRY: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Through Aug. 31

ANDREW'S & SON: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ARA MACAO: Trustee Taps Lane & Nach as Legal Counsel
ARA MACAO: Trustee Taps Stinson Leonard as Special Counsel
ASSISTCARE MEDICAL: Taps Medley & Associates as Legal Counsel
ATM MIRROR: Court Extends Time to Confirm Plan to Aug. 15

AUTO BUDDIES: Not Entitled to Setoff of Financial Obligations
BOSTON LANGUAGE: Taps John Sommerstein as Legal Counsel
BRADLEY J BARKER DDS: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
C.B. SERVICES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
CAMBER ENERGY: Former CEO's Group to Buy Assets, Assume Debt

CARRIZO OIL: Moody's Hikes CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
CASCELLA & SON: May Use Cash Collateral Thru August 31
CELLECTAR BIOSCIENCES: Effects 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split
CHICAGO, IL: Moody's Affirms Ba1 GO Rating, Outlook Stable
COLORADO LONESOME: Allowed to Use Cash on Continuing Interim Basis

COMSTOCK RESOURCES: Launches Tender Offers for Outstanding Notes
CORBETT-FRAME INC: Seeks Continued Cash Collateral Use
DANIEL LEWIS HENDON: District Ct. Affirms Dismissal of DFG Suit
DDC GROUP: Taps Resnik Hayes as Legal Counsel
DELTA AIR: Pilots Lose Summary Judgment Bid vs PBGC

DON FRAME TRUCKING: Wants to Use Cash for Wages & Gas Expenses
ECLIPSE BERRY: May Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
ENERGY FUTURE: FCRA Statute of Limitations Bars V. Dotson Claims
F & F SPECIALTY: Taps Thompson Law Group as Legal Counsel
F.Y.P.M. HOLDING: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors

FAH LIQUIDATING: Court Nixes BMW Bid for Leave to Appeal
FOUNDRY CLUB: Taps Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel
GAP INC: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' IDR, Then Withdraw Ratings
HAROLD ROSBOTTOM: District Court Upholds Final Decree Order
HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC: Settlement Between Trust and L. Mallory OK'd

HELIOS AND MATHESON: Revises Waiver Agreement with Noteholder
HELIOS AND MATHESON: Says Cash Deficit Up $45M in June
HOUSTON BLUEBONNET: JPMorgan et al.'s Informal Claims Equitable
ICONIX BRAND: Signs General Release and Waiver with Former CEO
INTELSAT SA: Moody's Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms Caa2 CFR

JOYFULL RIDE: May Use Medallion Trust Cash Collateral Thru Nov. 7
JUNE 16 INC: May Use Radius Bank Cash Collateral Until November 7
KCST USA: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral Through Sept. 30
LA STEEL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
LAURA ELSHEIMER: Bid to Use Cash Collateral Now Moot Amid Sale

MARBLE MASTERS: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Until August 31
MESOBLAST LIMITED: Shawn Cline Tomasello on Board as Director
MFL INC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
MILLWASP REALTY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
MLLD TRUCKING: 2nd Amended Chapter 11 Plan Filed

NAVISTAR FINANCIAL: Moody's Rates $400MM Term Loan 'Ba3'
NEIGHBORS LEGACY: Case Summary & 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors
OAKLAND PHYSICIANS: M. Short Bid for Reconsideration Rejected
OGHI LLC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
ONCOBIOLOGICS INC: Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule

OSBORN TAVERN: Taps Shapiro & Hender as Legal Counsel
PATRIOT NATIONAL: Court Narrows Claims in TTSL's Suit vs B&BC
PREFERRED CARE: Unknown Recovery for Unsecureds Under Plan
PSD INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PYRGOS TAXI: Seeks Court Permission to Use BRFCU Collateral

QUALITY CARE: Settles 2 Shareholders Class Suits
REDDY ICE: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Corporate Credit Rating
ROSEGARDEN HEALTH: Gets Nod on Continued Cash Collateral Use
ROYAL TRANSPORTATION: May Use Commerce Bank Cash Through Nov. 7
SAM MEYERS: Final Cash Collateral Order Entered

SAMARITAN COMMUNITY: Judge Signs Third Cash Collateral Order
SOJOURNER-DOUGLASS COLLEGE: Trustee Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
SOUTHWEST SYSTEMS: Taps Weinman & Associates as Legal Counsel
SPRUHA SHAH: Taps Leon Zelechowski as Real Estate Counsel
SPRUHA SHAH: Taps Timothy C. Culbertson as Legal Counsel

STRUSS FARMS: May Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
SULTAN FINANCIAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
SUNCREST STONE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TERRANOVA LANDSCAPES: Gets Approval of Plan to Exit Bankruptcy
THX PROPERTIES: Taps Sussman & Moore as Legal Counsel

TORIKADE INC: Taps Brundage Law as Legal Counsel
TOTAL PERFECTION: Taps Brian McCaffrey as Legal Counsel
TOTAL PERFECTION: Taps Nexus Accounting as Bookkeeper
TPG PACE: S&P Assigns 'B+' Corporate Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
TRIPOLIS TAXI: Wants to Use Cash Generated from Taxi Medallions

TROLL ROAD II: Fitch Affirms BB- Rating on 1999/2005 Revenue Bonds
TWO STREETS: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Thru Nov. 10
U & J REALTY: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
VICTORY ENTERTAINMENT: Taps George J. Paukert as Legal Counsel
WALL STREET THEATER: Wants to Use Cash to Purchase Lighting Hoists

WINDSOR MARKETING: Judge Signs 9th Interim Cash Collateral Order
WW CONTRACTORS: FNB Asks Court to Prohibit Cash Collateral Use
[*] 2018 DI Conference Discount Tickets Available for Early Birds
[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from July 9 to 13, 2018

                            *********

66 ON 66 BAR & GRILL: Gets Nod on Interim Cash Collateral Use
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California
has continued to July 23, 2018, the hearing on 66 on 66 Bar &
Grill, LLC's motions to use of cash collateral and obtain credit
under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 364.  The hearing was originally set for July
9.

The Hon. Scott H. Yun authorized Golden Crown Properties, LLC, and
66 on 66 Bar & Grill, LLC to use cash collateral, on an interim
basis, through and including July 9, 2018, pursuant to an Interim
Budget.  The Debtors are authorized to exceed any of the line items
in the Interim Budget by 20% during the Interim Period, so long as
the aggregate for each category during the Interim Period does not
exceed the aggregate budgeted expenses for the Interim Period by
more than 20%.

The Debtors were required to serve on Pacific Premier Bank a report
setting out all cash receipts and disbursements they made during
the period June 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018.

On July 6, the Debtors filed their 6-Month Budget with the Court.

The Interim Cash Collateral Order provides that Pacific Premier
Bank and other Secured Creditors will receive replacement liens on
the cash flow generated from operations, but only if, and to extent
that: (i) the Secured Creditors' pre-petition security interests
are valid, enforceable, properly perfected, and unavoidable; (ii)
the Secured Creditors have valid and perfected interests in the
cash used during the Interim Period; (iii) the Debtors use of cash
collateral results in a diminution of value of the Secured
Creditors' collateral; and (iv) any such replacement lien will not
include rights, claims, or causes of action arising under, or
related to, Bankruptcy Code Sections 105, 506(c), 542, 543,544,
545,547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, and 553.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-14462-64.pdf

                    About 66 on 66 Bar & Grill

66 on 66 Bar & Grill, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-14462) on May 25,
2018. In the petition signed by Noble Zubaid, its managing member,
the Debtor estimated assets and debts of less than $1 million. The
Debtor is represented by Sandford L. Frey, Esq. at Leech Tishman
Fuscaldo & Lampl, Inc.


ABENGOA KANSAS: Drivetrain Bid for Stay Pending Appeal Tossed
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 8, 2018, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Nugent entered a
Memorandum and Opinion confirming Debtor Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass
of Kansas, LLC's plan of liquidation and overruling the objections
to the plan filed by Drivetrain, LLC, as Liquidating Trustee for
Abengoa Bioenergy US Holding, LLC, et al.

On Feb. 16, 2018, Drivetrain filed a notice of appeal of the
Opinion, as well as a separate notice of appeal of the
not-yet-filed order confirming the debtor's plan of liquidation.
The Court consolidated the appeals on March 5, 2018. The case
captioned DRIVETRAIN, LLC, as Liquidating Trustee for Abengoa
Bioenergy US Holding, LLC, et al., Appellant, v. MARK D. KOZEL, as
Liquidating Trustee of the ABBK Liquidating Trust, Appellee, Case
No. 18-cv-1055-EFM (D. Kan.) is before the Court on Drivetrain's
Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. District Judge Eric F. Melgren
denies Drivetrain's motion.

Although the Court has discretion in determining whether to issue a
stay, it must consider four factors when exercising this
discretion. These factors include: "(1) whether the stay applicant
has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the
merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured
absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially
injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4)
where the public interest lies." "The first two factors . . . are
the most critical.

Upon analysis of the four factors, Drivetrain has failed to
persuade the Court that it should grant the requested stay. The
Court holds that Drivetrain has not made a strong showing that it
is likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal, and its arguments
regarding irreparable injury lack specificity and require the Court
to assume, without support, that events will unfold in a manner
injurious to Drivetrain. Although the Court has not been presented
information quantifying the likely harm others will sustain if the
Court grants Drivetrain's motion, the bankruptcy proceedings began
over two years ago, and it is unlikely that Drivetrain's appeal
will be quickly resolved. Further, the public interest weighs
against imposing a stay in this case. In summary, while the extent
to which others will suffer harm is unclear, the remaining factors
weigh against imposing a stay. Accordingly, the Court denies
Drivetrain's motion for stay pending appeal.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order dated June 12,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2J6fE7w from Leagle.com.

Drivetrain, LLC, Creditor; Liquidating Trustee for, Appellant,
represented by David Dunn -- david.dunn@hoganlovells.com --  Hogan
Lovells US LLP, pro hac vice, Lawrence Friedman --
lfriedman@thompsoncoburn.com -- Thompson Coburn LLP, pro hac vice,
Mark V. Bossi -- mbossi@thompsoncoburn.com -- Thompson Coburn LLP,
Michael Shane Johnson -- Michael.shane@hoganlovells.com -- Hogan
Lovells US LLP, pro hac vice, Nathaniel S. Boyer --
Nathaniel.boyer@hoganlovells.com -- Hogan Lovells US LLP, pro hac
vice, Pieter Van Tol -- pieter.vantol@hoganlovells.com -- Hogan
Lovells US LLP, pro hac vice & Ronald J. Silverman --
Ronald.silverman@hoganlovells.com -- Hogan Lovells US LLP, pro hac
vice.

Mark D. Kozel, as Liquidating Trustee of the ABBK Liquidating
Trust, Appellee, represented by Adam L. Fletcher --
afletcher@bakerlaw.com -- Baker Hostetler LLP, pro hac vice, Alexis
C. Beachdell -- abeachdell@bakerlaw.com -- Baker Hosteller LLP, pro
hac vice, Christine L. Schlomann , Armstrong Teasdale LLP,Kelly S.
Burgan -- kburgan@bakerlaw.com -- Baker Hostetler LLP, pro hac
vice, Michael A. VanNiel --  mvanniel@bakerlaw.com -- Baker
Hostetler LLP, pro hac vice & Robert L. Baer , Robert L. Baer.

            About Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass of Kansas

Three subcontractors asserting disputed state law lien claims
against Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass of Kansas, LLC filed on March 23,
2016, an involuntary petition to place the Company in bankruptcy
under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The case was converted to a
case under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case
No. 16-10446) on April 8, 2016.

In April 2016, Chief Bankruptcy Judge Robert E. Nugent denied the
request of Abengoa Kansas to transfer its case to the Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware where cases involving its
indirect parent companies and other affiliates are pending. Judge
Nugent said the facts and unique circumstances surrounding Abengoa
Kansas and its known creditors do not warrant transferring the
case.

Abengoa Kansas hired Armstrong Teasdale LLP, and DLA Piper LLP (US)
as counsel. Petitioning creditor Brahma Group, Inc. is represented
by Martin Pringle Oliver Wallace & Bauer. Petitioning creditors CRB
Builders LLC and Summit Fire Protection Co. are represented by Horn
Aylward & Bandy LLC.

The official committee of unsecured creditors is represented in the
Kansas bankruptcy case by Baker & Hostetler LLP and Cosgrove, Webb
& Oman.

On April 14, 2017, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of liquidation.

On July 19, 2017, Drivetrain LLC filed a disclosure statement
explaining its proposed plan of liquidation for the Debtor.
Drivetrain is the liquidating trustee appointed pursuant to the
plans of liquidation approved in the Chapter 11 cases of the
Debtor's affiliates in St. Louis, Missouri.


ACUSPORT CORP: Taps Scott L. Braum as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
AcuSport Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Ohio to hire Scott L. Braum &
Associates Ltd as special counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in matters related to compliance
with federal firearms regulations.

Scott Braum, Esq., and Timothy Rudd, Esq., the attorneys who will
be providing the services, charge $360 per hour and $300 per hour,
respectively.

Mr. Braum disclosed in a court filing that his firm neither holds
nor represents any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Scott L. Braum, Esq.
     Scott L. Braum & Associates Ltd
     812 E. Franklin St.
     Dayton, OH 45459
     Phone: (937) 396-0089

The Chapter 11 case is In re AcuSport Corporation (Bankr. S.D. Ohio
Case No. 18-52736).


AGROKOR D.D.: Chapter 15 Case Summary
-------------------------------------
Affiliated companies that filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code:

     Debtor                                         Case No.
     ------                                         --------
     Agrokor d.d.                                   18-12104
     Ulica Marijiana Cavica 1
     Zagreb, Croatia

     Agrokor Trgovina d.o.o.                        18-12105
     Belje d.d.                                     18-12106
     Ledo d.d.                                      18-12107
     Jamnica d.d.                                   18-12108
     Konzum d.d.                                    18-12109
     PIK-Vinkovci d.d.                              18-12110
     Vupik d.d.                                     18-12111
     Zvijezda d.d.                                  18-12112

Business Description:        The Agrokor Group  --
                             http://www.agrokor.hr/en-- is a
                             privately owned company in Croatia
                             engaged in retail, food, agriculture
                             and other areas of businesses.

Chapter 15 Petition Date:    July 12, 2018

Court:                       United States Bankruptcy Court
                             Southern District of New York
                             (Manhattan)

Judge:                       Hon. Martin Glenn

Chapter 15 Petitioner:       Fabris Perusko

Chapter 15
Petitioner's
Counsel:                     James H.M. Sprayregen, Esq.
                             Daniel Rudewicz, Esq.
                             KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                             601 Lexington Avenue
                             New York, NY 10022
                             Tel: (212) 446-4800
                             Fax: (212) 446-4900
                             Email: james.sprayregen@kirkland.com
                                    daniel.rudewicz@kirkland.com


                                - and -


                             Adam C. Paul, P.C.
                             Brad Weiland, Esq.
                             Whitney Fogelberg, Esq.
                             KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
                             300 North LaSalle
                             Chicago, IL 60654
                             Tel: (312) 862-2000
                             Fax: (312) 862-2200
                             Email: daniel.rudewicz@kirkland.com
                                    brad.weiland@kirkland.com
                                    whitney.fogelberg@kirkland.com

Foreign
Proceeding
in Which
Appointment
of the Foreign
Representative
Occurred:                    Extraordinary Administration
                             Proceedings in Companies of Systemic
                             Importance of the Republic of Croatia

Estimated Assets:            Unknown

Estimated Debts:             Unknown

A full-text copy of the Chapter 15 petition is available for free
at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-12104.pdf


ALVIN LO OPTOMETRY: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Through Aug. 31
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Sheri Bluebond of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California authorized Alvin Lo Optometry, Inc.,
d/b/a Optometrx Optometry to use cash collateral to pay all of the
expenses set forth in a budget for the period through August 31,
2018 or such other later date as may be agreed upon in writing by
the Debtor's alleged secured creditors.

The Budget shows total monthly expenses of approximately $23,984
during the months of July and August 2018. The Debtor is authorized
to deviate from the total expenses contained in the Budget by no
more than 20%, on a line by line basis and by no more than 20% in
total -- provided the Debtor does not pay any expenses outside any
of the approved categories -- without the need for further Court
order.

The budget reflects a carve-out for the Debtor's attorneys' fees in
the amount of $5,000 a month.  Those funds are to be held in
reserve in a Debtor-in-Possession account and will not be paid
until the Court has entered an appropriate order authorizing the
release of these funds.

Although the budget reflects a "carveout" for secured creditors, it
is the Debtor's intention to pay, and the Debtor is authorized to
pay, the amounts shown on the budget for secured creditors.

While the budget reflects a "carveout" for shareholder
distributions, the Debtor is not authorized to pay this amount at
this time. No compensation may be paid out to any insiders,
including Alvin Lo and Marie Ushirogata aka Marie Lo, until 15 days
after service of the Notice of Setting/Increasing Insider
Compensation, if no objection to such notice has been received or
filed with the Court, or until further order of the Court, if an
objection is filed.

The Secured Claimants are granted a replacement lien upon all
postpetition assets of the Debtor's estate to the extent of the
Debtor's use of cash collateral during the Budgeted Period, with
such replacement liens(s) to have the same extent, validity and
priority as the Secured Claimants' lien, if any, upon the Debtor's
pre-petition assets.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-14203-110.pdf

                      About Alvin Lo Optometry

Alvin Lo Optometry, Inc. d/b/a Optometrx Optometry, filed a Chapter
11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-14203) on
April 12, 2018.  In the petition signed by Alvin Lo, CEO, the
Debtor estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in assets and $500,000 to $1
million in liabilities. Robert M. Yaspan, Esq., at the Law Firm of
Robert M. Yaspan, is the Debtor's counsel.


ANDREW'S & SON: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Andrew's & Son Tradings Inc.
           dba Beston Shoes
        17585 Railroad St.
        City of Industry, CA 91748

Business Description: Andrew's & Son Tradings Inc. dba
                      Beston Shoes is in the footwear and athletic

                      shoes business.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 13, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Case No.: 18-18022

Judge: Hon. Ernest M. Robles

Debtor's Counsel: Christopher J. Langley, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICES OF LANGLEY & CHANG
                  4158 14th St.
                  Riverside, CA 92501
                  Tel: 951-383-3388
                  Fax: 877-483-4434
                  Email: chris@langleylegal.com

Total Assets: $1.04 million

Total Liabilities: $3.35 million

The petition was signed by Jiazheng Lu, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

                     http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-18022.pdf


ARA MACAO: Trustee Taps Lane & Nach as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
G. Grant Lyon, the Chapter 11 trustee for Ara Macao Holdings, LP,
seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Arizona to hire Lane & Nach, P.C. as his legal counsel.

The firm will represent the trustee in consultations concerning the
administration of the Debtor's estate; assist in the preparation of
a plan of reorganization; and provide other legal services related
to its Chapter 11 case.

The hourly rates range from $245 to $345 for the firm's attorneys
and from $95 to $150 for paralegals.

Adam Nach, Esq., a member of Lane & Nach, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Adam B. Nach, Esq.
     Lane & Nach, P.C.
     2001 E. Campbell Avenue, Suite 103
     Phoenix, AZ 85016
     Telephone: (602) 258-6000
     Facsimile: (602) 258-6003
     Email: adam.nach@lane-nach.com

                   About Ara Macao Holdings

Ara Macao Holdings, L.P., provides real estate development
services.

On April 6, 2018, an involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed
against Ara Macao Holdings, L.P. (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
18-03615).  The case is assigned to Judge Paul Sala.

The petitioning creditors are KB Partners, Inc., Christopher de
Sibert, Gary Nitsche, Daniel Dorgan, Richard Umbach and Edgewater
Resources, LLC. They are represented by Patrick A Clisham, Esq., at
Engelman Berger, P.C.

On May 8, 2018, the involuntary proceeding was converted to a
voluntary Chapter 11 proceeding (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
18-03615).  The Debtor hired Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A., as
bankruptcy counsel.

Ilene J. Lashinsky, U.S. Trustee for the District of Arizona, on
June 22 appointed five creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Ara Macao
Holdings, L.P.


ARA MACAO: Trustee Taps Stinson Leonard as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
G. Grant Lyon, the Chapter 11 trustee for Ara Macao Holdings, LP,
seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Arizona to hire Stinson Leonard Street, LLP as special counsel.

The firm will assist the trustee in the transition of the Debtor's
case, which was converted to a voluntary Chapter 11 case pursuant
to the court's May 8 order, and provide certain transactional legal
services in connection with the case.

The firm's hourly rates range from $200 to $750.  The attorneys and
paralegal anticipated to provide the services are:

     Thomas Salerno              $715
     Guy Smith                   $550
     Alisa Lacey                 $630
     Christopher Simpson         $520
     Anthony Cali                $320
     Karen Graves, Paralegal     $220

Stinson neither holds nor represents any interest adverse to the
Debtor's estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Thomas J. Salerno, Esq.  
     Alisa C. Lacey, Esq.
     Christopher C. Simpson, Esq.
     Anthony P. Cali, Esq.
     Stinson Leonard Street, LLP
     1850 N. Central Avenue, Suite 2100
     Phoenix, AZ 85004-4584
     Phone: 602.279.1600
     Email: thomas.salerno@stinson.com
     Email: alisa.lacey@stinson.com
     Email: christopher.simpson@stinson.com
     Email: anthony.cali@stinson.com

                   About Ara Macao Holdings

Ara Macao Holdings, L.P., provides real estate development
services.

On April 6, 2018, an involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed
against Ara Macao Holdings, L.P. (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
18-03615).  The case is assigned to Judge Paul Sala.

The petitioning creditors are KB Partners, Inc., Christopher de
Sibert, Gary Nitsche, Daniel Dorgan, Richard Umbach and Edgewater
Resources, LLC. They are represented by Patrick A Clisham, Esq., at
Engelman Berger, P.C.

On May 8, 2018, the involuntary proceeding was converted to a
voluntary Chapter 11 proceeding (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No.
18-03615).  The Debtor hired Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A., as
bankruptcy counsel.

Ilene J. Lashinsky, U.S. Trustee for the District of Arizona, on
June 22 appointed five creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Ara Macao
Holdings, L.P.


ASSISTCARE MEDICAL: Taps Medley & Associates as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Assistcare Medical Group LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to hire
Medley & Associates, LLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; assist in the
preparation of a plan of reorganization; represent the Debtor in
any potential sale or disposition of its assets; and provide other
legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Senior Attorneys              $350
     Associate Attorneys           $200
     Paralegals                    $150
     Administrative Assistants      $50

Medley & Associates received a filing fee of $1,717 from the
Debtor.

Leonard Medley, III, Esq., at Medley & Associates, disclosed in a
court filing that his firm does not represent any interest adverse
to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Leonard R. Medley, III, Esq.
     Medley & Associates, LLC
     2727 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 1450
     Atlanta, GA 30339
     Phone: 770-319-7592
     Email: leonard@mkalaw.com

                About Assistcare Medical Group LLC

Assistcare Medical Group LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-59426) on June 5,
2018.  In the petition signed by Mark Johnson, its member, the
Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of less than $50,000.


ATM MIRROR: Court Extends Time to Confirm Plan to Aug. 15
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
extended ATM Mirror, Inc.'s time to confirm its Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization to August 15.

Under the first amended plan, creditors holding Class 2 general
unsecured claims will receive a distribution of 20% of the allowed
amount of their claims, payable in 20 equal quarterly installments,
without interest, starting on the effective date.  

Class 2 claims are impaired and, therefore, general unsecured
creditors are entitled to vote to accept or reject the plan.

The plan will be funded from ATM Mirror's continued and future
operations, according to the company's first amended disclosure
statement.

                        About ATM Mirror

ATM Mirror, Inc., is a glass manufacturing and installation
company, installing projects from residential frame-less shower
doors to commercial architectural glass such as balconies.  ATM
Mirror is a family-owned business operating since 2005.

ATM Mirror filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 16-23276) on Sept. 21, 2016, estimating assets and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  The petition was signed by
James Count, president Judge Robert D. Drain presides over the
case.  

Dawn Kirby, Esq., at DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise &
Wiederkehr, LLP, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  Fino and
Associates is the Debtor's accountant.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


AUTO BUDDIES: Not Entitled to Setoff of Financial Obligations
-------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant, Auto Buddies, Inc., in the case captioned CAROLYN
PIZZELLA, Appellee, v. AUTO BUDDIES, INC., Appellant, No. 522 MDA
2017 (Pa. Super.) appeals from the March 17, 2017 judgment in favor
of Appellee Carolyn Pizzella. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania
affirms.

On Dec. 1, 2011, Appellant leased a commercial building at 260
South River Street in Plains, Pennsylvania from Appellee for use in
Appellant's used automobile sales business. The Lease was for one
year, with nine options for additional one-year terms. It required
Appellant to pay rent, utilities, maintenance, and property taxes
for the Premises. In February of 2012, the Luzerne County Tax
Bureau issued a delinquent notice for real estate taxes due from
the Premises. Appellant paid the past due amount within eight days
of the delinquent notice and without any apparent prompting from
Appellee. In September of 2012, Appellee sent Appellant a letter
advising that Appellee did not intend to permit Appellant to renew
the lease for another year. Appellant responded the next day,
stating that it intended to exercise its right of renewal under the
Lease. In October of 2012, Appellee sent Appellant notice of its
intent to terminate the Lease.

In her complaint that is the subject of this appeal, Appellee
alleged that Appellant failed to pay rent and property taxes,
totaling $11,310.14, from April through September of 2015. Appellee
also claimed Appellant owed $600 in late fees, for a total of
$11,910.14. Appellant filed an answer, new matter, and counterclaim
in which it claimed a setoff for the $11,700 in attorney's fees
incurred during the Prior Actions. Appellee filed a reply, alleging
that the trial court never awarded attorney's fees in the Prior
Actions and denying the amount Appellant allegedly incurred.

In the present appeal, Appellant is claiming that it has been
entitled all along to a setoff against its financial obligations
under the Lease. In light of the tortuous procedural history of the
parties' various disputes under the Lease, the Court is constrained
to leave the parties to this appeal as the Court has found them
because neither has preserved or articulated a sufficient basis for
disturbing the judgment. Appellant has persistently refused to
remain current with its financial obligations under the Lease, in
clear defiance of the trial court's rejection of its setoff
argument. While the Court's result is not an endorsement of the
trial court's setoff analysis, the Court concludes that Appellant,
after it failed to appeal from the contempt order, continued to
defy the trial court at its own risk. Appellant's failure to refute
the trial court's specific findings on the amount and materiality
of its breach of the Lease warrants affirmance of the judgment and
renders its stay of eviction arguments moot. Regarding Appellee,
she did not appeal, and therefore has failed to preserve any
challenge to the trial court's award of attorney's fees, including
her argument that Appellant was not the successful party in the
Prior Actions. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court affirms
the judgment.

A full-text copy of the Court's Decision dated June 12, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2J7s5Qs from Leagle.com.

Andrew Joseph Katsock, III, for Appellant, Auto Buddies, Inc.

John Patrick Rodgers, Wetze


BOSTON LANGUAGE: Taps John Sommerstein as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
The Boston Language Institute, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts to hire John
Sommerstein, Esq., as its legal counsel.

Mr. Sommerstein will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under
the Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related
to its Chapter 11 case.

Mr. Sommerstein charges an hourly fee of $375.  He received $2,000
for pre-bankruptcy services and a $15,000 retainer.

In a court filing, Mr. Sommerstein disclosed that he is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Sommerstein maintains an office at:

     John F. Sommerstein, Esq.
     98 North Washington Street
     Boston, MA 02114
     Phone: 617-523-7474
     Email: jfsommer@aol.com

             The Boston Language Institute Inc.

The Boston Language Institute, Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 18-12508) on
June 29, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed
that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities
of less than $50,000.  Judge Joan N. Feeney presides over the case.


BRADLEY J BARKER DDS: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley J. Barker, DDS, P.C. seeks authorization from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to use cash
collateral in accordance with the proposed budget for operation
pending the confirmation of a reorganization plan.

The Debtor intends to file a plan that will result in the
reorganization of the business and its continued operation.

The Debtor receives cash collateral in the form of payments from
patients and will deposit them into a debtor-in-possession account.
The Debtor has no source of income other than the payments made by
patients.

The monthly income of the Debtor varies and as it varies, some of
his expenditures vary accordingly. Certain expenditures, such as
expenditures for lab fees (production of dental appliances and
prosthetics such as crowns, bridges and inserts) are essential and
directly proportional to the income. Likewise, the payment of
licenses to operate the business should not be limited by an
amount.

The Debtor proposes that the Court approve the proposed budget as
the maximum amounts that the Debtor may expend in any given month
excepting expenditures marked with an asterisk: lab fees in the
amount of $5,750, licenses, and Insurance-Disability-Doctor. These
expenditures so marked will be increased or decreased to match the
actual amount incurred during the relevant month.

The Debtor believes that Live Oak Bank and Direct Capital have
prepetition perfected liens against the Debtor's accounts. However,
Live Oak Bank has the first lien and is undersecured.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-33298-4.pdf

                About Bradley J. Barker, DDS, P.C.

Bradley J. Barker, DDS, P.C. -- http://smile-envy.com/-- doing
business as Compassionate Health Care Services 77494A doing
business as Pink Dental aka Barker Aesthetic Dentistry also known
as Smile Envy owns a dental clinic in Katy, Texas, specializing in
family care, cosmetic dentistry, one-visit crowns, implant
dentistry, smile-whitening, orthodontics, sedation dentistry,
digital impressions, gum disease, TMJ/jaw pain, porcelain veneers,
and athletic mouthguards.

Bradley J. Barker, DDS filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 18-33298), on June 18, 2018. The Petition was signed
by Bradley J. Barker, president. The case is assigned to Judge
David R Jones. The Debtor is represented by Charles R. Chesnutt,
Esq. at Charles R. Chesnutt, P.C. At the time of filing, the Debtor
had $100,000 to $500,000 in estimated assets and $1 million to $10
million in estimated liabilities.


C.B. SERVICES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: C.B. Services, Inc.
        3317 Finley Road, Ste. 104
        Irving, TX 75062

Business Description: C.B. Services, Inc. is a privately held
                      water main contractor in Irving, Texas.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 13, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Texas (Sherman)

Case No.: 18-41527

Judge: Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades

Debtor's Counsel: Christopher J. Moser, Esq.
                  QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT &
                  MOSER, P.C.
                  2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
                  Dallas, TX 75201-3005
                  Tel: (214) 871-2100
                  Fax: (214) 871-2111
                  Email: cmoser@qslwm.com

                    - and -

                  Kyle Woodard, Esq.
                  QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT MOSER PC
                  2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800
                  Dallas, TX 75201
                  Tel: 214-871-2100
                  Fax: 214-871-2111
                  Email: kwoodard@qslwm.com

Total Assets: $801,619

Total Liabilities: $814,490

The petition was signed by Charles Bishop, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb18-41527_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb18-41527.pdf


CAMBER ENERGY: Former CEO's Group to Buy Assets, Assume Debt
------------------------------------------------------------
Camber Energy, Inc. has executed an asset purchase agreement with
N&B Energy, LLC dated July 12, 2018, in connection with the planned
disposition of a substantial portion of its assets in exchange for
the buyer's assumption of all of Camber's senior debt with
International Bank of Commerce.  The proposed buyer pursuant to the
letter of intent is a party affiliated with Richard N. Azar II,
Camber's former chief executive officer and former director who
resigned on June 21, 2018, and Donnie B. Seay, a former director
who resigned on July 10, 2018.

The closing of the transaction is subject to customary closing
conditions including final approval of IBC and approval of the
Company's shareholders, among others.

In the event the transaction is approved by the Company's
shareholders and closes, the Company will retain its assets in
Glasscock County and Hutchinson Counties, Texas and will also
retain a 12.5% production payment (subject to a maximum of $2.5
million) and a 3% overriding royalty interest in its existing
Okfuskee County, Oklahoma asset.  In addition, Camber will be
retaining an overriding royalty interest on certain undeveloped
leasehold interests.  Camber is also evaluating additional
acquisition opportunities which will further enhance the Company's
growth plans, funding permitting.

Additionally, if the closing occurs, it will extinguish all of the
Company's existing bank debt, which will significantly enhance the
Company's balance sheet and cash flow by eliminating the current
required monthly debt service payments of $425,000 per month.  The
Company is currently negotiating a forbearance agreement with IBC
while shareholder approval for the transaction is sought, which
forbearance it hopes to complete within the next ten days.

The Interim CEO of Camber, Louis G. Schott, noted, "This
transaction is a major step towards improving the Company's balance
sheet and regaining compliance with the continued listing standards
of the NYSE American."

Mr. Schott continued, "This should also position the Company for
growth through acquisition and development opportunities."

A full-text copy of the Asset Purchase Agreement is available for
free at https://is.gd/75KfQC

The buyer can be reached at:

        N&B Energy, LLC
        Attn: Richard Azar, Manager
        4040 Broadway, Suite 425
        San Antonio, TX 78209
        Phone: (210) 829-7151
        Fax: (210) 829-1224
        Email: richarda@sezarenergy.com

and is represented by:

        Christopher H. Moore
        Stephen K. Ganske
        Knobles, Raetzsch, Moore & Eveld, LLP
        202 N. Camp Street
        Seguin, TX 78209
        Phone: 830-379-9445
        Email: cmoore@krmelaw.com; sganske@krmelaw.com

                        About Camber Energy

Based in San Antonio, Texas, Camber Energy, Inc. (NYSE American:
CEI) -- http://www.camber.energy/-- is an independent oil and gas
company engaged in the development of crude oil, natural gas and
natural gas liquids in the Hunton formation in Central Oklahoma in
addition to anticipated project development in the Texas
Panhandle.

Camber Energy reported a net loss of $24.77 million for the year
ended March 31, 2018, compared to a net loss of $89.12 million for
the year ended March 31, 2017.  As of March 31, 2018, Camber Energy
had $14.26 million in total assets, $41.23 million in total
liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $26.96 million.

GBH CPAs, PC's audit opinion included in the company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018 contains a
going concern explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
significant losses from operations and had a working capital
deficit as of March 31, 2018.  These factors raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


CARRIZO OIL: Moody's Hikes CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.'s
Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to B1 from B2, its Probability of
Default Rating to B1-PD from B2-PD, and the ratings on its senior
unsecured notes to B2 from B3. The Speculative Grade Liquidity
(SGL) Rating was moved to SGL-3 from SGL-2. The ratings outlook is
stable.

"The upgrade reflects Carrizo's improved credit metrics and growth
in production volumes, as it continues the development of its Eagle
Ford Basin and Delaware Basin acreage," stated James Wilkins,
Moody's Vice President. "Despite continuing negative free cash
flow, Moody's expects the company to grow earnings and improve its
credit metrics."

The following summarizes the ratings activity.

Upgrades:

Issuer: Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Upgraded to B1-PD from B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Upgraded to B1 from B2

Senior Unsecured Notes, Upgraded to B2 (LGD5) from B3 (LGD5)

Downgrades:

Issuer: Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Downgraded to SGL-3 from SGL-2


Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc.

Outlook, Changed To Stable From Positive

RATINGS RATIONALE

Carrizo's B1 CFR reflects its competitive Eagle Ford operations,
growing Permian position and improved cash flow generation. Moody's
expects the company's retained cash flow to debt to remain above
30% as positive free cash flow generated from the Eagle Ford
operations partially funds drilling in the Delaware Basin, which is
in the early stages of development. Carrizo has good capital
efficiency, but high capital intensity and ongoing cash flow
outspend in support of its ambitious growth targets. Its focus on
maintaining high cash margins is supported by a competitive cost
structure, its liquids-heavy production base, and higher oil price
realizations from its Eagle Ford production volumes. Moody's
expects the company will continue to outspend its operating cash
flows through 2019, which will be funded with revolver borrowings.
As the company continues to grow in its core areas, Moody's
anticipates it will generate higher funds from operations and
corresponding improvements in credit metrics. In recent years,
Carrizo has been successful in financing its growth using a prudent
combination of equity and debt financing, asset sales, and joint
ventures. Moody's expects Carrizo will continue to pursue small,
bolt-on acquisitions and monetize non-core assets.

The SGL-3 rating reflects Moody's expectation that Carrizo will
have adequate liquidity through mid-2019, supported by cash flow
from operations and sufficient availability under its revolving
credit facility to cover continued negative cash flow through the
period. As of March 31, 2018, Carrizo had modest cash balances
($4.9 million) and $378 million of available borrowing capacity
under its revolving credit facility, which matures in May 2022. The
borrowing base under the revolver was increased to $1 billion
following the May 2018 redetermination; however, the company
elected to maintain $900 million of commitments, which should
provide it adequate funding for its capital expenditure program.
The borrowing base is re-determined two times per year. The credit
facility is subject to certain covenants, including net debt to
EBITDA of 4.0x, and a current ratio of 1.0x. Moody's expects
Carrizo to maintain ample cushion for compliance with these
covenants through mid-2019. The next debt maturity is $130 million
of notes due in September 2020.

Carrizo's senior unsecured notes are rated B2, one notch below the
B1 CFR, consistent with Moody's Loss Given Default Methodology. The
notes, benefit from upstream guarantees from all material
subsidiaries, are contractual subordinated to borrowings under the
secured revolving credit facility. The size of the potential senior
secured claims relative to the unsecured notes outstanding results
in the notes being rated one notch below the CFR. Should the
revolver borrowings grow substantially relative to the notes, the
notes could be rated two notches below the CFR, instead of the
current one notch difference.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Carrizo will
grow production as it executes on its drilling plans, while
maintaining a leveraged full cycle ratio above 1.5x and improving
credit metrics, despite the cash flow outspend. Carrizo's ratings
could be upgraded if it achieves production rates approaching 85
Mboe/d while maintaining retained cash flow (RCF) to debt above 40%
and debt to proved developed reserves approaching 10x. Carrizo will
also need to reduce the ongoing negative free cash flow, thereby
improving its liquidity, in order to be considered for an upgrade.
A downgrade would be considered if Carrizo's RCF to debt ratio is
sustained below 25%, or if capital efficiency weakens.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.

Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., headquartered in Houston, Texas, is an
independent exploration and production company with reserves and
production primarily in the Eagle Ford Shale and the Delaware
Basin.


CASCELLA & SON: May Use Cash Collateral Thru August 31
-------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Julie A. Manning of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut has signed a twenty-fourth order
authorizing Cascella & Son Construction, Inc., to use the cash
collateral of TD Bank, formerly Hudson Valley Bank, First Niagra
Bank formerly New Alliance Bank, the Internal Revenue Service and
the Town of Monroe until the earlier of: (a) August 31, 2018 or,
(b) the date on which the Debtor fails in any material respect to
comply with the terms, conditions or provisions of the
Twenty-Fourth Order.

A further hearing on the continued use of cash collateral will be
held on August 14, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.  Any objection to the
continued use of cash collateral must be filed and served no later
than August 9.

The Debtor is authorized to collect and use the prepetition
collateral including without limitation the cash collateral in
order to continue the usual and ordinary operations of the Debtor
in the ordinary course of its business by paying those budgeted
expenditures set forth on the budget.

The approved Budget provides total expenses of $13,465 for the
month of July 2018 and $12,815 for the month of August 2018. The
Debtor will be allowed a 8% variance per line item for expenses and
to that extent, it may transfer between line items but in no event
will the aggregate Expenditures for any Budget period exceed the
total amount of Expenditures for such Budget period set forth on
the Budget.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor and Hudson Bank n/k/a TD
Bank and New Alliance Bank n/k/a First Niagra Bank were parties to
Loan and Security Agreements pursuant to which, among other things,
Hudson and New Alliance provided the Debtor with loans and credit
facilities.  As of the Petition Date, the Debtor was indebted to
Hudson Bank in the amount of $250,000 and New Alliance Bank for
$230,000.

The IRS and the Town of Monroe also claim liens on the Debtor's
assets by virtue of tax liens on file.

TD Bank, First Niagra, the IRS and the Town of Monroe are each
granted with postpetition claims against the Debtor's estate, which
will have priority in payment over any other indebtedness and
obligations now in existence or incurred hereafter by the Debtor
and over all administrative expenses or charges against property of
the kind, subject only to the carve-out.  

As security for the Adequate Protection Claim, the Debtor also
grants to TD Bank, First Niagra, the IRS and the Town of Monroe an
enforceable and perfected replacement lien and security interest in
the postpetition assets of the Debtor's estate equivalent in
nature, priority and extent to their liens and security interests
in the prepetition collateral and the proceeds and products
thereof, subject to the carve-out.

The Carve-Out consists of:

     (a) the allowed administrative claims of attorneys and other
professionals retained by the Debtor in this Case in the aggregate
amount of $30,000; and

     (b) amounts payable to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section
1930(a)(6).

In addition, the Debtor will continue to keep the Collateral fully
insured against all loss, peril and hazard and make Hudson loss
payee as its interests appear under such policies.

A full-text copy of the 24th Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb14-50518-293.pdf

                 About Cascella & Son Construction

Cascella & Son Construction, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 14-50518) on April 7, 2014.  The petition
was signed by Todd Michael Cascella, its president.  The Debtor
disclosed $3.48 million in liabilities at the time of the filing.
The case is assigned to Judge Alan H.W. Shiff.  The Debtor is
represented by James M. Nugent, Esq., at Harlow, Adams and
Friedman.


CELLECTAR BIOSCIENCES: Effects 1-for-10 Reverse Stock Split
-----------------------------------------------------------
Cellectar Biosciences, Inc. announced a 1-for-10 reverse split of
its common stock, effective at the close of business on July 13,
2018.

Stockholders approved the reverse stock split at Cellectar's
special meeting of stockholders held on July 12, 2018.  On July 9,
2018, Cellectar's Board of Directors approved the implementation of
the reverse stock split and determined the appropriate reverse
stock split to be a ratio of 1-for-10, subject to stockholder
approval.

Shares of Cellectar's common stock will trade on a post-split basis
beginning on July 17, 2018.  The Company's ticker symbol, CLRB,
will remain unchanged.  The new CUSIP number for Cellectar's common
stock post-reverse split will be 15117F500.

At the effective time of the reverse stock split, every 10 shares
of Cellectar's issued and outstanding common stock will
automatically be combined and converted into 1 issued and
outstanding share of common stock without any change in the par
value of the shares.  This will reduce the outstanding common
shares of Cellectar from approximately 18 million to approximately
1.8 million.  Proportional adjustments will also be made to the
shares issuable in connection with Cellectar's outstanding stock
options and warrants.

Proportionate voting rights and other rights of common stockholders
will not be affected by the reverse stock split, other than as a
result of the cashing out of fractional shares. Stockholders who
would otherwise hold a fractional share will receive a cash payment
in lieu of a fractional share.  Direct any questions you might have
regarding the reverse split to your broker or the company's stock
transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, by calling
(718) 921-8317.

                  About Cellectar Biosciences

Cellectar Biosciences -- http://www.cellectar.com/-- is a clinical
stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the discovery,
development and commercialization of targeted treatments for cancer
and leveraging its proprietary phospholipid drug conjugate (PDC)
platform to develop the next generation of tumor targeting
treatments.  Its headquarters are located in Madison, Wisconsin.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Baker
Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, in Madison, Wisconsin, on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital
deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.

Cellectar reported a net loss attributable to common stockholders
of $15.01 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, following a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $9.36 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Cellectar had
$9.56 million in total assets, $2.11 million in total liabilities
and $7.45 million in total stockholders' equity.


CHICAGO, IL: Moody's Affirms Ba1 GO Rating, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service has affirmed the Ba1 rating on the City
of Chicago, IL's outstanding general obligation debt (GO).
Concurrently, the outlook has been revised to stable from negative.
The ratings apply to $6.7 billion of rated GO debt.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The affirmation of the Ba1 general obligation rating reflects the
city's strength arising from a massive economic base and broad
legal authority to extract resources from that base against the
risk created by rapidly growing costs to service a very heavy
pension burden. The city is adhering to its five year plan to
increase pension contributions as required by state statute while
maintaining healthy financial reserves and liquidity. The city's
practical ability to continue to increase taxes in light of large
liabilities of overlapping units of government remains a key
uncertainty and will be highly dependent on the trajectory of the
local economy, the performance of pension plan assets and continued
political willingness.

RATING OUTLOOK

The outlook was revised to stable from negative based on the
expectation that Chicago will not face significant budgetary
obstacles in the next two to three years given recently enacted tax
increases to finance rapidly growing pension contribution
requirements. The stable outlook also reflects reduced contingent
risks related to improved liquidity at Chicago Public Schools (B2
stable) following large increases in state support and the
district's own tax levy.

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO AN UPGRADE

  - Successful absorption of legislatively mandated increases in
pension funding tied to actuarial targets that does not rely on the
use of reserves or nonrecurring budget maneuvers

  - Moderation of the city's pension burden arising from rapid
economic and revenue growth or reduced liabilities

FACTORS THAT COULD LEAD TO A DOWNGRADE

  - Substantial diversion of city revenues to special purpose
entities that materially reduces available resources to pay GO bond
holders

  - Erosion of the city's financial position, or heightened
operating risk at Chicago Public Schools

  - Material growth in the city's debt and pension burden that
further limits financial flexibility

LEGAL SECURITY

Chicago's GO bonds are secured by the city's full faith and credit
pledge payable from all available revenues including a tax levy
unlimited as to rate or amount.

PROFILE

The City Chicago, with a current estimated population of 2.7
million, is the largest city in the State of Illinois and third
most populous in the US.

METHODOLOGY

The principal methodology used in these ratings was US Local
Government General Obligation Debt published in December 2016.


COLORADO LONESOME: Allowed to Use Cash on Continuing Interim Basis
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Erik P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida authorized Colorado Lonesome Dove, LLC
to use cash collateral on a continuing interim basis.

The Debtor and, after appointment, the chapter 11 trustee are
authorized to continue to use cash collateral and the proceeds of
the DIP Loan pursuant to the same terms provided in the Court's
Agreed Third Interim Order Granting Debtor's Emergency Motion for
Authority to: (A) Obtain Post-Petition Financing and (B) Utilize
Cash Collateral through and including July 11, 2018.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-13283-76.pdf

                      About Colorado Lonesome Dove

Goodnight's Lonesome Dove RV Campground & Cabins is a recreational
camp located at 180065 US Hwy 160 South Fork, CO 81154.
Goodnight's Lonesome Dove RV Campground & Cabins has year-round
family activities for the sports enthusiast and nature lover
alike.

The Camp is convenient to skiing, hiking, fishing, horseback
riding, rafting, biking, or just relaxing.  It has 10 log cabins
open year-round, each with private bathrooms and fully equipped
kitchens. It also has 37 Large, full-hookup, RV sites that are all
grassy and are available May through Mid-November with a full
laundry and shower facility.

Colorado Lonesome Dove, LLC, d/b/a Goodnight's Lonesome Dove RV
Campground & Cabins, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 18-13283) on March 22, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Brian G. West, manager/member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.
The case is assigned to Judge Erik P. Kimball.  Latham, Shuker,
Eden & Beaudine, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


COMSTOCK RESOURCES: Launches Tender Offers for Outstanding Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
Comstock Resources, Inc. is commencing a tender offer with respect
to any and all of its outstanding:

     * Senior Secured Toggle Notes due 2020,
     * 7-3/4% Convertible Secured PIK Notes due 2019,
     * 9-1/2% Convertible Secured PIK Notes due 2020,
     * 10% Senior Secured Notes due 2020,
     * 7-3⁄4% Senior Notes due 2019, and
     * 9-1⁄2% Senior Notes due 2020

The total consideration to be received by holders whose Notes are
validly tendered, not validly withdrawn and accepted for purchase:

                               Outstanding      Last Interest
     Security               Principal Amount    Payment Date
     --------               ----------------    -------------
Toggle Notes due 2020         $697,195,000      March 15, 2018
7-3/4% PIK Notes due 2019     $295,464,697      April 1, 2018
9-1/2% PIK Notes due 2020     $195,947,491      June 15, 2018
10% Sr. Sec. Notes due 2020     $2,805,000      March 15, 2018
7-3⁄4% Sr. Notes due 2019      $17,959,000      April 1, 2018
9-1⁄2% Sr. Notes due 2020       $4,860,000      June 15, 2018

For each of the Securities, the Company is paying to the holders
$1,000 as Tender Offer Consideration per $1,000 Principal Amount.
No separate consent payment or fee is being paid to holders of
Notes in the Consent Solicitation.  In addition to the applicable
Tender Offer Consideration or Total Consideration, as applicable,
holders of Notes will receive an amount in cash equal to accrued
and unpaid interest from the last interest payment date on their
Notes up to, but excluding, the settlement date with respect to the
Tender Offer.

For the Senior Secured Toggle Notes due 2020 and 10% Senior Secured
Notes due 2020, the Company will pay the holders of these Notes an
additional $50 as Early Participation Premium per $1,000 Principal
Amount.

In conjunction with the Tender Offer, the Company is soliciting
consents from holders of the Notes to certain proposed amendments
to the respective indentures governing the Notes.  The Proposed
Amendments to the respective indentures that govern the Toggle
Notes and Convertible Notes would amend the respective redemption
provisions, release the liens on the collateral securing the Toggle
Notes and the Convertible Notes and eliminate most of the covenants
and certain of the default provisions applicable to such Notes.
The Proposed Amendments to the respective indentures that govern
the 10% 2020 Notes, the 2019 Senior Notes and the 2020 Senior Notes
would amend the respective redemption provisions.

Adoption of the Proposed Amendments (other than the Collateral
Release) requires the consent of the holders of at least a majority
of the outstanding principal amount of each series of Notes
(excluding any Notes held by affiliates).  Adoption of the Proposed
Amendments with respect to the Collateral Release requires the
consent of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding
principal amount of each applicable series of Notes (excluding any
Notes held by affiliates).

Each holder who validly tenders and does not validly withdraw its
Notes and validly delivers and does not validly revoke its
corresponding Consents prior to 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on
August 10, 2018 (as may be extended or earlier terminated, the
"Expiration Date") will receive, if those Notes are accepted for
purchase pursuant to the Tender Offer, the tender offer
consideration per $1,000 principal amount as described in the above
table.

Holders must validly tender their Toggle Notes or 10% 2020 Notes
prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City Time, on July 27, 2018 (as may be
extended or earlier terminated, the "Early Participation Time") to
also be eligible to receive the applicable early participation
premium in addition to the tender offer consideration.  In
addition, holders will receive an amount in cash equal to accrued
and unpaid interest from the last interest payment date on their
Notes up to, but excluding, the Settlement Date for all of their
Notes validly tendered, not validly withdrawn and accepted for
purchase.

Withdrawal rights with respect to the Tender Offers for the
Convertible Notes will expire at 11:59 p.m., New York City time, on
Aug. 10, 2018.  Withdrawal rights with respect to the Tender Offer
for the Toggle Notes, the 10% 2020 Notes, the 2019 Senior Notes and
the 2020 Senior Notes will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City Time,
on July 27, 2018.  The settlement date with respect to the Tender
Offer is expected to occur promptly after the Expiration Date once
the remaining conditions to the Tender Offer have been satisfied or
waived.

The completion of the Tender Offer and the related Consent
Solicitation is conditioned upon the satisfaction or waiver by the
Company of the closing of each of these transactions:

     (i) the closing of the contribution of certain oil and gas
assets by Arkoma Drilling, L.P. and Williston Drilling, L.P.,
entities owned by Jerry Jones and his family, to Comstock pursuant
to the Contribution Agreement entered into on May 9, 2018 between
Comstock and such entities;

    (ii) the Company's entry into a new senior secured revolving
credit facility; and

   (iii) the Company's issuance of approximately $850 million in
aggregate principal amount of new senior unsecured notes.

The Company also has amended the indentures governing the
Convertible Notes such that the 15 consecutive trading day VWAP
requirement under the mandatory conversion provision contained in
each such indenture will not commence prior to the earlier of (i)
Oct. 12, 2018 or (ii) the termination of the Contribution
Agreement.

Comstock has retained BofA Merrill Lynch to act as dealer manager
and solicitation agent for the Tender Offer and Consent
Solicitation.  D.F. King & Co., Inc. has been retained to serve as
the depositary and information agent for the Tender Offer and
Consent Solicitation.  Questions regarding the Tender Offer and the
related consent solicitation may be directed to BofA Merrill Lynch
at (888) 292-0070 (toll-free) or at (980) 388-4813 (collect).
Requests for the Tender Offer Documents may be directed to D.F.
King & Co., by phone at (866) 521-4192 (toll-free) or (212)
269-5550 (collect) or by email at crk@dfking.com.

None of Comstock, its board of directors, the trustee and the
collateral agent for the Notes, the Depositary and Information
Agent, the Dealer Managers and the Solicitation Agents or any of
their respective affiliates makes any recommendation as to whether
holders should tender, or refrain from tendering, all or any
portion of the principal amount of their Notes pursuant to the
Tender Offer.

A full-text copy of the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation,
dated July 13, 2018 is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/x58eHM

A copy of the Company's statement is available at
https://is.gd/ChWWFA

                         About Comstock

Comstock Resources, Inc. (NYSE: CRK) is an independent energy
company based in Frisco, Texas and is engaged in oil and gas
acquisitions, exploration and development primarily in Texas and
Louisiana.

Comstock incurred a net loss of $111.4 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $135.1 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Comstock Resources
had $910.5 million in total assets, $1.32 billion in total
liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $409.9 million.


CORBETT-FRAME INC: Seeks Continued Cash Collateral Use
------------------------------------------------------
Corbett-Frame, Inc., has filed another motion for authority to
continue using cash collateral.

The Hon. Gregory R. Schaaf of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Kentucky last month authorized Corbett-Frame to
use cash collateral to pay those items designated in the budget
only in accordance with the Interim Order from June 1, 2018 through
June 30, 2018.

The Debtor is seeking to confirm a Chapter 11 plan this week and
needs funds to finance the bankruptcy proceedings as well as
business operations.  The Debtor filed an Amended Chapter 11 Plan
on June 27.  The hearing to confirm its Small Business Chapter 11
Plan is slated for July 19 at 9:00 a.m. at Lexington Courtroom, 2nd
Floor.

Pursuant to the Interim Cash Collateral Order, US Bank and David
Yurman are each granted with replacement lien of the same type of
property/collateral as existed prepetition, subject only to any
valid and enforceable, perfected, and non-avoidable liens of other
secured creditors as indicated in previous orders. In addition, the
Debtor will continue to account for all cash use, and the proposed
cash use as set forth in the Budget is being incurred primarily to
preserve property of the Estate.   There is a carve-out for
Debtor's counsel, its accountants or other professionals (subject
to employment applications) as set forth on the Budget. There is
also an approved carve-out for payment of U.S. Trustee fees.
However, the adequate protection payments to US Bank will be timely
paid before any carve-out payments to professionals are made.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/kyeb17-51607-129.pdf

                        About Corbett-Frame

Corbett-Frame, Inc., d/b/a Corbett-Frame Jewelers, owns a jewelry
store in Lexington, Kentucky, offering contemporary designer
collections & customized pieces.  The Company is a small business
debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D).

Corbett-Frame filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No.
17-51607) on Aug. 9, 2017.  In the petition signed by Jennifer
Lykins, its president, the Debtor estimated its assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Gregory R. Schaaf.  Jamie L. Harris, Esq., at the
Delcotto Law Group PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case,
and no creditors' committee or other official committee has been
appointed.


DANIEL LEWIS HENDON: District Ct. Affirms Dismissal of DFG Suit
---------------------------------------------------------------
Appellants in the case captioned Diversified Funding Group LLC, et
al., Appellants, v. Hendon, et al., Appellee, Adv. No. 16-127-SHG.,
16-518-SHG (D. Ariz.)  appeal the Bankruptcy Court's decision to
dismiss Appellees. District Judge G. Murray Snow affirms the
decision.

In the complaints, DFG named Hendon and 25other non-debtors and
non-creditors as parties and sought relief in 18 separate counts.
In short summary of these complaints, Daniel Hendon and Heather
Hendon held a controlling interest in 14 separate carwashes. In
August 2013, in a plea agreement that resolved pending criminal
charges against him, Daniel  Hendon divested himself from ownership
of the carwash entities. The Verde Group, led by chairman Ernie
Garcia, purchased three mortgage notes secured by the carwashes,
which it sold to Pacwest three months later for a profit of over
$2,000,000. The Verde Group then made two loans to Heather Hendon:
for $1,000,000 in April 2015 and $600,000 in December 2015. Heather
Hendon, the Verde Group, Ernie Garcia, and Pacwest have settled
with DFG and are no longer parties to this suit.

DFG's complaints allege additional fraudulent activity among the
remaining parties. Eventually, both complaints were removed and/or
transferred to the District of Arizona Bankruptcy Court. Because
the defendants argued that the claims belonged exclusively to the
Trustee and not DFG, DFG purchased the Trustee's rights to
prosecute any potential claims. Concurrent with this purchase, DFG
settled with twelve of the defendants, including Heather Hendon,
Pacwest and the Verde Group. Many of the remaining parties filed
motions to dismiss the complaints. With few exceptions, the Court
granted the motions to dismiss without leave to amend. DFG
appeals.

In the opening brief, Appellants argue that the Bankruptcy Court
erred by (1) failing to consider the non-dischargeability judgment,
(2) dismissing the civil RICO claims with prejudice, and (3)
dismissing the claims without leave to amend.

Upon review, the Court finds that the the Appellants have failed to
demonstrate how the nondischargeability decision would change the
Bankruptcy Court's dismissal of the fraud and civil RICO claims.
The Bankruptcy Court did not commit legal error by not addressing
the nondischargeability determination. If the Bankruptcy Court
otherwise erred, DFG did not specifically and distinctly raise and
argue these issues in the opening brief.

Appellants also argue that the Bankruptcy Court committed legal
error by individually considering appellees' alleged actions rather
than collectively, and that the civil RICO portions of the
complaint would have survived under the proper review.

Considering that Rule 9(b)'s particularity requirement applies to
civil RICO fraud claims and that Rule 9(b) does not allow a
complaint to lump multiple defendants together, but requires
individual allegations supporting participation in the fraud, the
Bankruptcy Court did not commit legal error in dismissing
appellants' civil RICO claims.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated June 12, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2m2lYnm from Leagle.com.

Diversified Funding Group LLC, Reynaldo Gutierrez, Faradjollah Fred
Djahnadideh Trust, trustee of, HCM Retirement Trust, trustee of,
Rightpath Investors LLC, Sirotka Holdings LLC, iDEA Services LLC,
Van Buren Development LLC, Southwest Development Partners LLC &
Fortuna Asset Management LLC, Appellants, represented by David
Ripley Shaub , Wilson Keadjian Browndorft LLP.

Daniel Lewis Hendon, also named as Daniel L Hendon/ Debtor,
Appellee, pro se.

Nell Hendon, Appellee, represented by Robert Coleman Warnicke,
Warnicke Law PLC.

Chris Alvarez, Appellee, pro se.

Kelly Carroll, Appellee, represented by Jerry L. Cochran , Cochran
Law Firm PC & Michael S. Rubin -- mrubin@dickinsonwright.com --
Dickinson Wright PLLC.

Alan Meda & Burch & Cracchiolo PA, also named as: Burch &
Cracchiolo, Appellees, represented by Anthony S. Vitagliano ,
Manning & Marder Kass Ellrod Ramirez LLP.

Ernie Vasquez, Appellee, represented by Laura Allison Rogal --
lar@jaburgwilk.com -- Jaburg & Wilk PC.

Gil Olguin, Appellee, pro se.

Jay Swart, Appellee, pro se.

Maria Barker, Appellee, pro se.

Dickenson Wright PLLP & Carolyn J Johnsen, Appellees, represented
by Michael S. Rubin, Dickinson Wright PLLC & Robert Alan Shull,
Dickinson Wright PLLC.

Kent Despain, Appellee, pro se.

OCS Capital Group, Appellee, pro se.

Carolyn J. Johnsen, Appellee, pro se.

United States Trustees Office, Trustee, pro se.


DDC GROUP: Taps Resnik Hayes as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------
DDC Group, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to hire Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP
as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding matters of bankruptcy
law; conduct examinations; assist in the preparation and
implementation of a bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal
services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     M. Jonathan Hayes         Partner       $485
     Matthew Resnik            Partner       $450
     Roksana Moradi-Brovia     Partner       $385
     Russell Stong             Associate     $325
     David Kritzer             Associate     $325
     Pardis Akhavan            Associate     $185
     Rosario Zubia             Paralegal     $135
     Priscilla Bueno           Paralegal     $135
     Rebeca Benitez            Paralegal     $135

The Debtor paid the firm an initial retainer fee of $35,000, of
which $1,717 was used to pay the filing fee.

M. Jonathan Hayes, Esq., a partner at Resnik, disclosed in a court
filing that he and his firm are "disinterested persons" as defined
in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     M. Jonathan Hayes, Esq.
     Matthew D. Resnik, Esq.
     Roksana D. Moradi-Brovia, Esq.
     Resnik Hayes Moradi LLP
     15233 Ventura Blvd., Suite 250
     Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
     Telephone: (818) 783-6251
     Facsimile: (818) 827-4919
     Email: jhayes@SRHLawFirm.com
     Email: matthew@SRHLawFirm.com
     Email: roksana@SRHLawFirm.com

                       About DDC Group Inc.

DDC Group, Inc. is a full-service general contractor in Los
Angeles, California, specializing in expedited development service
for restaurants and retailers.

DDC Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 18-17029) on June 18, 2018.

In the petition signed by Slava Borisov, its president, the Debtor
disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Sheri Bluebond presides over the case.


DELTA AIR: Pilots Lose Summary Judgment Bid vs PBGC
---------------------------------------------------
The plaintiffs, approximately 1,700 former Delta Air Lines, Inc.
pilots, initiated the civil action captioned K. WENDELL LEWIS, et
al., Plaintiffs, v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION,
Defendant, Civil Action No. 15-1328 (RBW) (D.D.C.) against the
defendant, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation challenging the
Corporation's benefits determinations regarding the Delta Pilots
Retirement Plan under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act
(the "ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. section 1303(f) (2012). The Plaintiffs'
filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation's filed a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
and Opposition to the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment

Upon careful consideration of the parties' submissions, District
Judge Reggie B. Walton denies the plaintiffs' motion and grants the
Corporation's motion.

As an initial matter, the parties disagree as to what standard the
Court should apply in reviewing the Corporation's determinations of
the plaintiffs' benefits under the Plan. The plaintiffs argue that
the standard of review should be de novo because "[a] court reviews
an ERISA fiduciary's 'statutory and legal conclusions de novo,'"
and that the Court should not apply the two-step process the
Supreme Court adopted in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources
Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), or any other "form of
administrative-law type of deference," The Corporation argues in
response that "[b]oth the Supreme Court and the [District of
Columbia] Circuit have made clear" that the Chevron framework
applies to its interpretations of the ERISA.

Upon considering all the arguments and reviewing all the claims,
the Court concludes that the Chevron framework applies in this
matter, and that the arbitrary and capricious standard of review
applies to Claims Two through Four of the plaintiffs' First Amended
Complaint. The Court finds that the plaintiffs have failed to
establish any arbitrary, capricious, or unlawful agency action
based on the administrative record that was properly before the
Corporation at the time it rendered its decision, and thus it must
enter summary judgment in favor of the Corporation on Claims Two
through Four. The Court must also enter summary judgment in favor
of the Corporation on Claim Five because the plaintiffs have failed
to show by clear and convincing evidence that the Corporation's
determinations regarding the plaintiffs' recovery benefits were
unreasonable. Finally, the Court must dismiss Claim Six, the
plaintiffs' APA claim, because it is duplicative of the plaintiffs'
claims brought pursuant to the ERISA. Accordingly, the Court will
deny the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and grant the
Corporation's motion for summary judgment.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated June 11,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2J5mmuF from Leagle.com.

ALL PLAINTIFFS, Plaintiff, represented by Anthony F. Shelley --
ashelley@milchev.com -- MILLER & CHEVALIER, CHARTERED, Michael N.
Khalil -- mkhalil@milchev.com -- MILLER & CHEVALIER, CHARTERED &
Timothy Patrick O'Toole-- totoole@milchev.com -- MILLER &
CHEVALIER, CHARTERED.

PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Defendant, represented by
Joseph M. Krettek , PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION, Mark R.
Snyder , PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION & Paula June Connelly
, PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION.


DON FRAME TRUCKING: Wants to Use Cash for Wages & Gas Expenses
--------------------------------------------------------------
Don Frame Trucking, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of New York to pay pre-petition
employee priority claims for wages and benefits, and continue the
practice of paying vehicle and gas expenses.

The Debtor's Chapter 11 proceeding was triggered by a lawsuit
commenced by Don Frame's largest creditor, Jamestown Macadam, Inc.
Jamestown Macadam obtained a New York State Supreme Court order to
show cause with a temporary restraining order, seeking turnover and
attachment and other related forms of relief in connection with
that lawsuit. The temporary restraining order froze the Debtor's
bank accounts based upon its security interest in the Debtor's
personal property and its vehicles. The State Court and the
Plaintiff in that action, Jamestown Macadam, have been properly
notified of the Debtor's bankruptcy filing and its effect on the
continuation of that lawsuit.

The Debtor believes that Jamestown Macadam failed to properly
perfect its lien in its personalty, including both its cash and its
vehicles. Accordingly, the Debtor contends that at least $50,000 of
the bank account funds should be made immediately available to the
Debtor (with leave to request permission for access to additional
funds) pending a final determination that Jamestown Macadam's lien
in the Debtor's personal property is not enforceable now that the
bankruptcy has been filed.

The Debtor has three employees who are owed wages and related
benefits for work performed prior to the filing of the Petition.
Due to the timing of the Petition Date, a portion of salary and
wages owed to these employees that accrue daily became pre-petition
obligations.

Don Frame last satisfied its gross payroll obligations to its
employees on June 7, 2018 for the period May 27, 2018 through June
2, 2018, inclusive of all payroll taxes. As a result of the timing
of the Debtor's Chapter 11 filing, Don Frame's employees are owed
wages, salary and other payments on account of what now constitutes
prepetition services for the week commencing June 3, 2018 and
ending June 9, 2018 which would typically be paid on June 14, 2018.
There will also be wages and benefits earned pre-petition for the
time period from June 10 through June 12 that will be due on June
21, 2018.

Accordingly, the Debtor is requesting permission to pay these
employees for amounts owed on the day those wages and benefits
would ordinarily be due (June 14th and June 21st).

The three employees who were owed the foregoing pre-petition wages
and benefits are: (a) John Lanhpere, in the amount of $1,566.56;
(b) Jen Gugino, in the amount of $840; and (c) John Frame (officer
of Debtor), in the amount of $2,126.56

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb18-11147-10.pdf

                     About Don Frame Trucking

Don Frame Trucking, Inc., is a trucking company in Fredonia, New
York specializing in the transport of dry bulk commodities,
construction and hazardous materials.

Don Frame Trucking filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.N.Y.
Case No. 18-11147) on June 13, 2018. In the petition signed by John
D. Frame, vice president/treasurer, the Debtor estimated $1 million
to $10 million in both assets and liabilities. The Hon. Carl L.
Bucki presides over the case. Gross Shuman P.C., led by Robert J.
Feldman, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor. Woods Oviatt
Gilman LLP, is the special counsel.


ECLIPSE BERRY: May Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
-------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Barry Russell of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, at the behest of Eclipse Berry Farms, LLC,
and its debtor-affiliates, has entered an interim order authorizing
the agreed use of cash collateral to and through the date set for
the Final Hearing, in accordance with a budget, with an allowed
aggregate variance of 10% per week.

A continued hearing on the Cash Collateral Motion will be held on
July 31, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

Ventura Strawberry Farms, Inc. may hold an interest in cash
collateral.  As adequate protection for the Debtors' use of cash
collateral, Ventura is granted replacement liens on all of the
Debtors' property acquired post-petition solely to the extent, and
with the same validity and priority, as any pre-petition liens held
by Ventura.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-10443-365.pdf

                   About Eclipse Berry Farms

Founded in 1999, Eclipse Berry Farms operates farms that produce
berry products. The company is based in Los Angeles, California.

Eclipse Berry Farms and its affiliates Harvest Moon Strawberry
Farms, LLC, and Rosalyn Farms, LLC, filed Chapter 11 petitions
(C.D. Cal. Case Nos. 18-10443, 18-10453 and 18-10464, respectively)
on Jan. 16, 2018. In the petition signed by CRO Robert Marcus,
Eclipse Berry Farms estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets
and less than $100 million in debt.

The Hon. Barry Russell is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kevin H. Morse, Esq., at Saul Ewing Arnstein &
Lehr LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith,
LLP as local counsel; McCarron & Diess as special PACA counsel;
Murray Wise Capital LLC as financial advisor; and Lefoldt & Co.,
P.A., Certified Public Accountants as their accountant to wind-up
and audit the Debtors' 401(k) Plan.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Feb. 9, 2018.


ENERGY FUTURE: FCRA Statute of Limitations Bars V. Dotson Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Timothy D. Degiusti granted the TXU Energy
Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in the case captioned VANCE
DOTSON, Plaintiff, v. ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. d/b/a TXU
ENERGY, et al., Defendants, Case No. CIV-17-575-D (W.D. Okla.).

Plaintiff brought the action on May 19, 2017, against 16
defendants, alleging multiple violations of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act ("FCRA"). All Defendants, except Experian Information
Solutions, Inc., filed a Notice of Bankruptcy requesting the Court
stay the proceedings during the pendency of bankruptcy proceedings
involving Energy Future Holdings Corporation. Plaintiff filed a
response in opposition asserting that the instant action was not
one that could have commenced prior to EFH's filing of bankruptcy.

On June 27, 2017, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Defendants EFH,
TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, and TXU Energy Solutions Company
LLC.

The Court entered an Order on Sept. 19, 2017, concluding that 11
U.S.C. section 362(a)(1) did not operate to stay Plaintiff's claims
against Defendants. Based on the allegations in the Complaint, the
Court concluded that TXU Energy Defendants' conduct giving rise to
Plaintiff's claims occurred sometime after May 5, 2016, which was
two years after the bankruptcy petition was filed.

The 12 remaining TXU Energy Defendants have now filed a Motion for
Summary Judgment. TXU Energy Defendants reassert their position
that Plaintiff's claims arose pre-petition and that the bankruptcy
court has jurisdiction. In support of this argument, TXU Energy
Defendants point to facts that were not previously part of the
record. TXU Energy Defendants also argue that the FCRA statute of
limitations bars this action. Finally, TXU Energy Defendants assert
that they are not proper parties to this action as they are no
longer legal business entities because of conversion, dissolution
or merger.

An action under the FCRA must be brought "not later than the
earlier of two years after the date of discovery by the plaintiff
of the violation that is the basis for such liability, or five
years after the date on which the violation that is the basis for
such liability occurs." The two-year statute of limitations applies
here. Because this action was filed on May 19, 2017, Plaintiff's
claims are untimely if they accrued before May 19, 2015. The Tenth
Circuit has not clearly addressed this issue in the context of the
FCRA. Several lines of analysis have been developed by other
courts. The Court finds under any applicable analysis that
Plaintiff's FCRA claims are barred by the two-year statute of
limitations.

Plaintiff alleges in his Complaint that he sent a dispute letter to
TXU Energy on May 5, 2016.  Under Bittick, this May 5, 2016 letter
would not restart the limitations clock because the letter disputed
the same $107 trade line item that Plaintiff previously disputed in
February and April 2014.

Although Plaintiff alleges in the Complaint that on May 5, 2016, he
was denied a mortgage loan and obtained a copy of his Experian
credit report, which disclosed the disputed $107 trade line item
with TXU Energy, these are unverified conclusory allegations. There
is no evidence in the record of the denial of the mortgage, a copy
of the dispute letter, or a copy of his credit report. Thus,
Plaintiff's unsupported and conclusory allegations do not create an
issue of fact.

TXU Energy Industries Company, TXU Energy Services Company LLC, TXU
Energy Services Company, TXU Energy Solutions Management Company,
and TXU Energy Retail Company, LP all merged into entities that
were voluntarily dismissed from this lawsuit by Plaintiff on June
27, 2017. TXU Portfolio Optimization Company LLC merged into
Luminant Holding Company LLC in 2007. Luminant Holding Company LLC
is not a named defendant in this action.

The law in Texas, Delaware and Oklahoma is clear that when two
entities merge with one another, Plaintiff must file suit against
the surviving entity. The entity that survives the merger is the
only entity that has the capacity to be sued.

Accordingly, TXU Energy Industries Company, TXU Energy Services
Company LLC, TXU Energy Services Company, TXU Energy Solutions
Management Company, and TXU Energy Retail Company, LP -- entities
that merged into defendant entities which were voluntarily
dismissed by Plaintiff -- are entitled to summary judgment on
Plaintiff's claims. Further, TXU Portfolio Optimization Company LLC
is entitled to summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims, as that LLC
merged with an LLC that is not a named defendant in this action.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated June 13, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2KHwejP from Leagle.com.

Vance Dotson, Plaintiff, represented by Brian L. Ponder, Brian
Ponder LLP & Tiffany L. Hill, Tiffany Hill Attorney at Law.

TXU Energy Gas Asset Management Company, doing business as, TXU
Energy, TXU Energy Holdings Company, doing business as, TXU Energy,
TXU Energy Industries Company, doing business as, TXU Energy, TXU
Energy Retail Company LP, doing business as, TXU Energy, TXU Energy
Retail Management Company LLC, doing business as, TXU Energy, TXU
Energy Services Comapny, doing business as, TXU Energy, TXU Energy
Services Comapny LLC, doing business as, TXU Energy, TXU Energy
Solutions Management Company LLC, doing business as, TXU Energy,
TXU Energy Trading (Canda) Company & TXU Portfolio Optimization
Company LLC, Defendants, represented by Lyle R. Nelson --
lnelson@eliasbooks.com -- Elias Books Brown & Nelson PC.

Experian Information Solutions Inc, Defendant, represented by Jimmy
K. Goodman -- jimmy.goodman@crowedunlevy.com -- Crowe & Dunlevy &
William R. Taylor -- wrtaylor@jonesday.com -- Jones Day.

                  About Energy Future

Energy Future Holdings Corp., formerly known as TXU Corp., is a
privately held diversified energy holding company with a portfolio
of competitive and regulated energy businesses in Texas. Oncor, an
80 percent-owned entity within the EFH group, is the largest
regulated transmission and distribution utility in Texas. The
Company delivers electricity to roughly three million delivery
points in and around Dallas-Fort Worth. EFH Corp. was created in
October 2007 in a $45 billion leverage buyout of Texas power
company TXU in a deal led by private-equity companies Kohlberg
Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Inc.

On April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings and 70 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 14-10979) after reaching a deal with some key
financial stakeholders to keep its businesses operating while
reducing its roughly $40 billion in debt.

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi (CSS).

As of Dec. 31, 2013, EFH Corp. reported assets of $36.4 billion in
book value and liabilities of $49.7 billion. The Debtors had $42
billion of funded indebtedness as of the bankruptcy filing.

EFH's legal advisor for the Chapter 11 proceedings is Kirkland &
Ellis LLP, its financial advisor is Evercore Partners and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal. The TCEH first lien
lenders supporting the restructuring agreement are represented by
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP as legal advisor, and
Millstein & Co., LLC, as financial advisor.

The EFIH unsecured creditors supporting the restructuring Agreement
are represented by Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, as legal
advisor, and Centerview Partners, as financial advisor. The EFH
equity holders supporting the restructuring agreement are
represented by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, as legal advisor,
and Blackstone Advisory Partners LP, as financial advisor. Epiq
Systems is the claims agent.

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, the successor trustee for the
second-lien noteholders owed about $1.6 billion, is represented by
Ashby & Geddes, P.A.'s William P. Bowden, Esq., and Gregory A.
Taylor, Esq., and Brown Rudnick LLP's Edward S. Weisfelner, Esq.,
Jeffrey L. Jonas, Esq., Andrew P. Strehle, Esq., Jeremy B. Coffey,
Esq., and Howard L. Siegel, Esq.

On May 13, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of TCEH Unsecured Creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases. The TCEH
Committee is composed of (a) the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation; (b) HCL America, Inc.; (c) BNY, as Indenture Trustee
under the EFCH 2037 Notes due 2037 and the PCRBs; (d) LDTC, as
Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Unsecured Notes; (e) Holt Texas
LTD, d/b/a Holt Cat; (f) ADA Carbon Solutions (Red River); and (g)
Wilmington Savings, as Indenture Trustee under the TCEH Second Lien
Notes. The TCEH Committee retained Morrison & Foerster LLP as
counsel; Polsinelli PC as co-counsel and conflicts counsel; Lazard
Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker; FTI Consulting, Inc., as
financial advisor; and Charles River Associates as an energy
consultant.

On Oct. 27, 2014, the U.S. Trustee appointed the Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors representing the interests of the unsecured
creditors for EFH, EFIH, EFIH Finance, and EECI, Inc. The EFH/EFIH
Committee is composed of (a) American Stock Transfer & Trust
Company, LLC; (b) Brown & Zhou, LLC c/o Belleair Aviation, LLC; (c)
Peter Tinkham; (d) Shirley Fenicle, as successor-in-interest to the
Estate of George Fenicle; and (e) David William Fahy. The EFH/EFIH
Committee retained Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhodes, LLP, as
co-counsel and conflicts counsel; AlixPartners, LLP, as
restructuring advisor; Sullivan & Cromwell LLC as counsel;
Guggenheim Securities as investment banker; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants LLC as noticing agent for both the TCEH Committee and
the EFH/EFIH Committee.

Given the size and complexity of the Chapter 11 Cases, the U.S.
Trustee proposed, and the Debtors and the TCEH Committee agreed, to
recommend that the Bankruptcy Court appoint a committee to, among
other things, review and report as appropriate on fee applications
and statements submitted by the professionals paid for by the
Debtors' Estates. The Fee Committee is comprised of four members:
(a) one member appointed by and representative of the Debtors
(Cecily Gooch, Vice President and Special Counsel for
Restructuring, Energy Future Holdings); (b) one member appointed by
and representative of the TCEH Creditors’ Committee (Peter
Kravitz, Principal and General Counsel, Province Capital); (c) one
member appointed by and representative of the U.S. Trustee (Richard
L. Schepacarter, Trial Attorney, Office of the United States
Trustee); and (d) one independent member (Richard Gitlin, of Gitlin
and Company, LLC). The Fee Committee retained Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
as counsel; and Phillips, Goldman & Spence, P.A., as co-counsel.

On Aug. 29, 2016, Judge Sontchi confirmed the Chapter 11 exit Plans
of two of Energy Future Holdings Corp.’s subsidiaries, power
generator Luminant and retail electricity provider TXU Energy Inc.
(the "T-Side Debtors"). The Plan became effective on Oct. 3, 2016.

On Aug. 20, 2017, Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE) announced an agreement
to acquire Energy Future Holdings, the indirect owner of 80 percent
of Oncor Electric Delivery Company, LLC, operator of the largest
electric transmission and distribution system in Texas. Under the
agreement, Sempra Energy will pay approximately $9.45 billion in
cash to acquire Energy Future and its ownership in Oncor, while
taking a major step forward in resolving Energy Future's
long-running bankruptcy case. The enterprise value of the
transaction is approximately $18.8 billion, including the
assumption of Oncor's debt.

On Nov. 3, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order closing the
Chapter 11 cases of 40 affiliate debtors. The claims asserted
against, and interests asserted in, the Closing Cases are
transferred to the lead case of Texas Competitive Electric Holdings
Company LLC, Case No. 14-10978. A list of the Closing Cases is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/EnergyFuture_decreeclosing40.pdf


F & F SPECIALTY: Taps Thompson Law Group as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
F & F Specialty Coffee seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to hire Thompson Law
Group, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; prosecute actions to protect and preserve its
estate; and provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11
case.

The firm's attorneys and paralegals charge $250 per hour and $90
per hour, respectively.  Prior to the petition date, Thompson Law
Group received a retainer of $4,667 from the Debtor.

Brian Thompson, Esq., at Thompson Law Group, disclosed in a court
filing that he and his firm are "disinterested persons" as defined
in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Brian C. Thompson, Esq.
     Thompson Law Group, P.C.
     125 Warrendale-Bayne Road, Suite 200
     Warrendale, PA 15086
     Phone: (724) 799-8404
     Fax: (724) 799-8409
     Email: bthompson@thompsonattorney.com

                   About F & F Specialty Coffee

F & F Specialty Coffee, which conducts business under the name
Fortunes Gourmet Coffee, is a specialty food store offering a
selection of crafted blends and artisan roasted coffees.  It has
been providing coffee to its wholesale customers for over 60
years.

F & F Specialty Coffee sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 18-22699) on July 2,
2018.  In the petition signed by Fred M. Smallhover, II, owner, the
Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of $1 million to $10
million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Gregory L. Taddonio presides over the case.


F.Y.P.M. HOLDING: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: F.Y.P.M. Holding Inc.
        PO Box 322
        Lincolndale, NY 10540-0322

Business Description: F.Y.P.M. Holding is a privately held
                      company whose principal assets are located
                      at 728 Route 6 Mahopac, NY 10541-1689.  The
                      Property is valued by the company at
                      $675,000.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 13, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Case No.: 18-12125

Judge: Hon. Sean H. Lane

Debtor's Counsel: Barak P. Cardenas, Esq.
                  CARDENAS ISLAM & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
                  17561 Hillside Avenue, Suite 302
                  Jamaica, NY 11432
                  Tel: 347-809-7810
                  Fax: 914-861-0099
                  Email: barak@cardenasislam.com

Total Assets: $702,964

Total Liabilities: $1,871,996

The petition was signed by Pasqualina Maffucci, vice president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-12125.pdf


FAH LIQUIDATING: Court Nixes BMW Bid for Leave to Appeal
--------------------------------------------------------
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft ("BMW"), defendant in
the adversary proceeding captioned EMERALD CAPITAL ADVISORS CORP.,
in its capacity as Trustee for the FAH Liquidating Trust,
Plaintiff, v. BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT,
Defendant, Misc. No. 17-160 (GMS) (D. Del.) moves the court for
leave to appeal the Bankruptcy Court's interlocutory decision
granting in part and denying in part BMW's motion to dismiss the
adversary proceeding. District Judge Gregory M. Sleet denies the
motion for leave.

According to the Complaint, the dispute arises from agreements
between BMW, a corporation organized under the laws of the Federal
Republic of Germany, and Fisker Automotive, Inc. Debtors were
founded in 2007 to design, assemble, and manufacture premium
plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Around October 2011, Debtors were
developing the "N" or "Nina Platform" to launch their second
vehicle, the Atlantic sedan. Debtors entered into supply and
service agreements with third parties including BMW. In April 2011,
the parties entered into a development agreement "for the
installation of BMW N26B20 engines with parts and components into a
Fisker Nina vehicle. . . for the purpose of securing the project's
milestones with the view of the conclusion of a final Purchase,
Supply and Development Agreement." The parties also entered into a
supply agreement for "the supply of BMW N20B20 engines [], other
standard BMW powertrain and chassis parts and components . . . for
use in the Nina."

The Agreements obligated Fisker to pay BMW for its services in
three tranches. The Complaint alleges that Debtors made five wire
transfers in the total amount of $32,579,798.87 between June 30,
2011 and April 9, 2012. BMW acknowledges that Debtors made all
three tranche payments required under the development agreement on
June 30, December 20, and April 4, 2011. On Nov. 19, 2015, the
Trust filed its complaint seeking to recover from BMW the $32.5
million in Transfers. The Complaint alleges that BMW did not
manufacture or deliver any engines pursuant to the Agreements or
otherwise give any value in exchange for the Transfers. The
Complaint seeks to recover the Transfers under various theories,
including: avoidance, recovery, and turnover of certain of the
transfers as constructively fraudulent under §§ 542, 548, and 550
(Counts I, III, and IV); avoidance of the transfers as
constructively fraudulent under § 544(b)(1) (Count II); and unjust
enrichment (Count V).

On June 13, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court issued the Decision granting
in part and denying in part BMW's motion to dismiss. The Bankruptcy
Court dismissed Trustee's claims under section 544 (Count II),
concluding that German law, as the applicable non-bankruptcy law,
did not provide a remedy. The Bankruptcy Court further dismissed
Counts I, III, and IV to the extent of $31,786,216.13, ruling that
all but $793,761.87 of the transfers were made outside of the
applicable statutory period. The Bankruptcy Court denied the motion
to dismiss with respect to the remaining $793,761.87 on the basis
that Trustee had adequately alleged that the Debtors received less
than reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Transfers.
Finally, the Bankruptcy Court denied the motion to dismiss with
respect to the unjust enrichment count. The Bankruptcy Court noted
that it had previously allowed claims for unjust enrichment to
proceed where the debtor might be left with no other legal remedy;
here, Trustee had a plausible legal remedy, in form of constructive
fraudulent transfer claim, for only $793,761.87 of the Transfers
made within the 2-year look back period, and not for the remaining
$31,786,216.13 in payments: "Trustee has brought the adversary
proceeding to recover more than $32.5 million that Debtors
transferred to [BMW] for what appears to be little or nothing. It
remains unclear what, if anything, Debtors received in return for
the payments. Trustee has some viable claims." BMW seeks leave to
appeal the Decision, arguing that the Bankruptcy Court erred in
failing to dismiss all claims.

BMW argues that leave to appeal is appropriate as the Bankruptcy
Court's decision is contrary to well-established law and conflicts
with cases holding that an unjust enrichment count tied to
contractual payments cannot lie, as there is no "absence of a
remedy provided by law."

The Court finds that while BMW may ultimately prevail in its
argument, it cites no authority addressing whether an unjust
enrichment claim may proceed to discovery, where a governing
contract was rejected in bankruptcy, where it is plausible that the
plaintiff's other claims may fail and leave the plaintiff without a
remedy at law. The Bankruptcy Court's determination that Trustee
may plead in the alternative is also well supported by case law.
BMW has failed to demonstrate a genuine doubt as to the correct
legal standard or that the Decision is contrary to well-established
law, rendering interlocutory review of this issue inappropriate.

A party seeking leave to appeal an interlocutory order must also
establish that "exceptional circumstances justify a departure from
the basic policy of postponing review until after the entry of
final judgment." BMW argues that the court should entertain the
appeal now because, by reversing immediately, the court "will
prevent the [Decision] from adversely impacting capital formation
in the start-up industry." According to BMW, if the decision is not
reversed, "in the future no established firm would contract with a
startup." Id. Trustee argues BMW has offered no evidence in support
of its prediction, and even if possible, BMW "identifies no reason
why an appeal is justified now (rather than following a final
order)." The court agrees with Trustee. "Interlocutory appeal is
meant to be used sparingly and only in exceptional cases where the
interests cutting in favor of immediate appeal overcome the
presumption against piecemeal litigation." The court is not
persuaded that there are exceptional circumstances here justifying
immediate appeal.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum dated June 11, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2u6N5Ca from Leagle.com.

Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, Appellant, represented
by Colm F. Connolly, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP.

Emerald Capital Advisors Corp., Appellee, represented by Mark
Minuti – mark.minuti@saul.com -- Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP.


FOUNDRY CLUB: Taps Eric A. Liepins as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
Foundry Club, LLC and Foundry Ventures, Inc. seek approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to hire
Eric A. Liepins, P.C. as their legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtors regarding their duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
their Chapter 11 cases.

Eric Liepins, Esq., will charge $275 per hour.  The hourly fees for
paralegals and legal assistants range from $30 to $50.

The firm received a retainer of $5,000 from Foundry Club.

Mr. Liepins disclosed in a court filing that his firm does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
     Eric A. Liepins, P.C.
     12770 Coit Road, Suite 1100
     Dallas, TX 75251
     Phone: (972) 991-5591
     Fax: (972) 991-5788
     Email: eric@ealpc.com

              About Foundry Club and Foundry Ventures

Foundry Club, LLC serves entrepreneurs and business professionals
by providing the services, resources and community they need to
create, connect and grow.  Its affiliate Foundry Ventures, Inc. is
an entrepreneurial workspace company.  

Foundry Club, LLC and Foundry Ventures, Inc. sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Texas Case
Nos. 18-32177 and 18-32178) on July 2, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Barry Capece, managing member of Foundry
Club, both Debtors disclosed that they had estimated assets of less
than $500,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.


GAP INC: Fitch Affirms 'BB+' IDR, Then Withdraw Ratings
-------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed and withdrawn all its ratings for The
Gap, Inc., including its Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at 'BB+'.

Fitch has withdrawn Gap's ratings for commercial reasons. Fitch
reserves the right in its sole discretion to withdraw or maintain
any rating at any time for any reason it deems sufficient.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Recent Comp Improvement after Multi-Year Decline

Gap's brands operate in a difficult apparel sector, which has been
characterized by lack of a strong product cycle and market share
loss to e-commerce and lower-end fast fashion and off-price
channels, which to some extent has benefitted Gap's Old Navy brand.
Gap and its peers have seen volatile sales results and have needed
to use significant omnichannel investments and higher-than-expected
markdowns to drive sales. While apparel retailer store closures
appear to be alleviating some of the competitive pressure for
existing players, the industry's overall challenges remain
heightened.

Gap's companywide comparable store sales (comps) have been weak
recently with average annual comps of negative 1% over the past
three years. While comps improved to positive 3% in 2017 (driven by
Old Navy) and 1% in 1Q18, Gap continues to generally experience
declines in traffic, similar to peers in the mall-based specialty
apparel space. Fitch expects the company's comps to be flattish
going forward on continued sector challenges as well as the
company's erratic track record of connecting with consumers on
compelling product.

Old Navy's (46% of 2017 revenue) weak performance in late 2015 and
early 2016 was of particular concern given that the brand's growth
had mitigated sales declines at the Gap and Banana Republic brands
for several years. However, comps for the brand have rebounded to
6% in 2017 from flat in 2015 and 1% in 2016. While Old Navy's
value-oriented positioning appears to be resonating with consumers
again, comps at Gap and Banana Republic brands continue to be
negative, with the brands reporting negative 1% and negative 2%
comps in 2017, respectively.

Gross Margins Still Volatile

Gross margins fell from a peak in the 40% range in 2009-2010 to a
trough 36.4% in 2015/2016 although rebounded to 38.3% in 2017 on
somewhat stabilized sales trends, reduced inventory buys and a
faster product cycle. Fitch projects margins could remain near 38%
beginning 2018 as sourcing initiatives to reduce product lead times
are mitigated by continued sector challenges. Recent industry
capacity reductions should benefit overall margins through fewer
unplanned promotions to match competitor actions and clear goods,
although Gap's margins will remain heavily dependent on customer
acceptance of its collections.

Proactive Expense Management Somewhat Abating

Proactive cost-management efforts resulted in Gap's SG&A expenses
trending between $4.0 billion and $4.2 billion between 2012 and
2016, despite some inflationary pressures on wages and other
categories. The company announced in September 2017 it identified
an incremental $500 million in cost savings over a three-year span
from productivity opportunities. These opportunities include fully
exploiting the scale and leverage of the company, and reducing and
standardizing the systems and processes.

Despite the incremental cost savings, SG&A grew nearly 10% from
2016 to 2017 to $4.6 billion as the company ramped spending on
growth initiatives, including omnichannel investments and product
innovation (such as technological enhancements to improve fit, wear
and laundering/care attributes). SG&A also rose due to higher
employee bonuses resulting from improved topline trends. Fitch
expects Gap to continue investing in growth opportunities, somewhat
mitigated by recently announced cost savings. As a result, SG&A
beginning 2018 could be flattish or grow modestly (excluding
impacts from recent revenue recognition changes).

The combination of flattish sales, gross margins and SG&A expenses
would yield EBITDA trending near the $2 billion level achieved in
2016 and 2017, down from the 2013 peak of $2.7 billion. Fitch
believes Gap would need to generate a sustainably positive
companywide comp trend to drive EBITDA materially higher from 2017
levels.

Prudent Real Estate Strategy

Given industry challenges, Gap has been proactive across its brands
in taking appropriate real estate actions to reflect changing
shopping habits. The company reduced its North American Gap and
Banana Republic specialty fleet by around 700 stores since 2005,
with a combined 1,386 North American locations remaining as of Feb.
3, 2018. Fitch expects the company could close a further 100 to 200
locations over the next two to three years. Square-footage growth
is centered on the better performing Old Navy brand and
athleisure-focused Athleta brand.

Strong Liquidity; Stabilizing Credit Metrics

Gap has good liquidity, with $1.8 billion of cash and an unused
$500 million revolver as of Feb. 3, 2018. The company generated FCF
after dividends of nearly $300 million in 2017, a decline from 2016
due to significant higher capex and a negative working capital
swing. Fitch expects FCF to be in the $300 million-$400 million
range annually on neutral working capital and higher capex compared
with 2017. Fitch expects FCF to be directed toward share
repurchases. Total adjusted debt/EBITDAR, which increased to 3.5x
in 2017 from 2.9x in 2013 on EBITDA declines, is expected to trend
near mid-3x on flattish EBITDA projections.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Gap's 'BB+' rating reflects the company's position as a leading
multibrand global apparel retailer. The company's rating also
reflects the challenges facing the mid-tier mall-based apparel
sector, company-specific merchandising inconsistency, and Fitch's
expectation that Gap will need to continue using real estate
actions and cost-reduction programs to protect EBITDA given limited
revenue growth opportunities. The company's EBITDA margin decline
coupled with sales declines over the last few years led to EBITDA
declining to $2.0 billion in 2017 from peak levels of $2.7 billion
in 2013, and leverage increasing to the current mid-3.0x range from
2.9x.

Gap's leverage is similar to Levi Strauss & Co. (BB/Positive) and L
Brands, Inc. (BB+/Negative). Levi is somewhat focused on the denim
category compared with Gap's broader product assortment. However,
Levi has a more diverse channel and geographic exposure. Levi's
leverage historically exceeded that of Gap, and it only recently
improved leverage to the mid-3.0x range on EBITDA improvement and
debt reduction. L Brands has historically been a strong operator,
but its commitment to returning cash to shareholders via equity
buybacks and dividends has restricted the rating. Its current
Negative Outlook reflects recent sales and EBITDA challenges
stemming from merchandising difficulties at its flagship Victoria's
Secret brand.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  -- Comps are expected to be near flat beginning in 2018. Revenue,
which was $15.9 billion in 2017, could be near $17 billion in 2018
due to a recent revenue recognition change related to proprietary
credit card and loyalty income (which has no impact to EBITDA) and
the loss of 2017's 53rd week. Revenue is projected to be range
bound near $17 billion thereafter.

  -- Fitch expects annual EBITDA to trend near $2 billion, similar
to results in 2016/2017, given flattish merchandise revenue and
margins (ex revenue recognition changes). Gross margins are
expected to remain near the current 38% level while growth SG&A
investments are forecasted to be mostly mitigated by ongoing
expense reductions.

  -- Fitch projects annual FCF after dividends in the $300
million-$400 million range beginning in 2018, assuming neutral
working capital and annual capex in the low- to mid-$800 million
range. This range compares to around $300 million in 2017, which
saw a negative working capital swing; FCF should also benefit
beginning 2018 from reduced cash taxes following regulatory tax
reform. The company repaid the remaining balance on its Japanese
term loan (U.S. dollar equivalent of $65 million) in 2017, but no
further debt reduction is expected as Gap's remaining notes mature
in 2021.. FCF is expected to be directed towards share repurchases.


  -- Adjusted leverage is expected to remain in the mid-3x range
over the next three years, assuming the operating results and
flattish rent expense.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Rating sensitivities are no longer relevant given due to rating
withdrawals.

LIQUIDITY

Gap has good liquidity, with $1.8 billion of cash and an unused
$500 million revolver as of Feb. 3, 2018. Following the repayment
of remaining balance on its Japanese term loan (U.S. dollar
equivalent of $65 million) in 2017, Gap's remaining outstanding
debt consists of $1.25 in senior unsecured notes. Approximately 90%
of Gap's Fitch-defined debt is capitalized leases.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed and withdrawn the following ratings:

The Gap, Inc.

  -- Long-term IDR at 'BB+';

  -- $500 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility at
'BB+/RR4';

  -- Senior unsecured notes at 'BB+/RR4'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


HAROLD ROSBOTTOM: District Court Upholds Final Decree Order
-----------------------------------------------------------
Harold L. Rosbottom, Jr., appeals from the bankruptcy court's Order
on Motion for Final Decree filed by Appellee, Gerald H. Schiff who
served as the Trustee in the bankruptcy proceeding. Rosbottom
requests that the Final Decree Order and the orders on which it
relies be vacated and the opinion of the bankruptcy court be
reversed. District Judge S. Maurice Hicks, Jr. affirms the
bankruptcy court's ruling.

Rosbottom contends that the bankruptcy court violated the due
process clause of the United States Constitution and Fed. R. Bankr.
P. 9029 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 83(a)(2) by excluding all of his
evidence in opposition to Schiff's Motion for Final Decree Order by
operation of the bankruptcy court's standing order. Schiff advances
two arguments: (1) Rosbottom has waived any due process claim by
raising such for the first time on appeal, and (2) Rosbottom has no
due process claim.

The Court is not persuaded by Rosbottom's contention that his due
process rights were violated. In fact, the bankruptcy court in
allowing Rosbottom access to the hearing transcript and to file his
Post Hearing Memorandum raising any concerns that he was unable to
at the hearing due to his non-appearance satisfied any due process
concern.

Rosbottom also argues that pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P.
9029(a)(2), the bankruptcy court's standing order resulted in the
loss of rights, i.e., loss of right to present evidence and
cross-examine witnesses. However, the Court is unpersuaded by
Rosbottom's argument. As indicated, Rosbottom lost no rights
because the bankruptcy court allowed Rosbottom access to the
hearing transcript and to file his Post Hearing Memorandum raising
any concerns that he was unable to at the hearing due to his
non-appearance. Rosbottom was aware of the standing order prior to
the hearing and had he wished to present evidence and cross-examine
witnesses he could have hired an attorney. The Court finds that
Rosbottom was fully aware that he being imprisoned prevented him
from presenting evidence and cross-examining witnesses at
bankruptcy hearings.

Following the hearing, it is clear to the Court that the bankruptcy
court considered the evidence and witnesses presented at the March
23 hearing as well as Rosbottom's Post Hearing Memorandum before
deciding to grant Schiff's Motion for Final Decree. Ultimately, the
bankruptcy court found that all payments to creditors under the
plan had been completed, rendering the Final Decree Order proper.
Therefore, modification of the Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan would
serve no purpose and is not permitted by law. Furthermore, it is
clear to the Court that the bankruptcy court's ruling mooting
Rosbottom's thirteen motions relating to the modification of the
confirmed Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan was not done
"willy-nilly," but was based on substantive evidence and findings
that the bankruptcy court believed rendered moot any relief sought
in the thirteen motions. Therefore, the Court finds that the
bankruptcy court did not clearly err in entering its Final Decree
Order and thereafter mooting Rosbottom's other motions, namely his
modification motions.

The cases are HAROLD L. ROSBOTTOM, JR, v. GERALD H. SCHIFF, Civil
Action Nos. 17-0638 (LEAD), 17-0668 (MEMBER) (W.D. La.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Ruling dated June 12,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2m5iReH from Leagle.com.

Harold L. Rosbottom, Jr, Appellant, pro se.

Gerald H Schiff, Appellee, represented by Peter A. Kopfinger --
peter.kopfinger@kellyhart.com -- Kelly Hart Pitre, Armistead Mason
Long , Gordon Arata et al, Courtney Smart Lauer , Vinson & Elkins,
Louis M. Phillips -- louis.phillips@kellyhart.com -- Kelly Hart
Pitre, Patrick Michael Shelby -- rick.shelby@kellyhart.com -- Kelly
Hart Pitre & Ryan James Richmond , Stewart Robbins & Brown.

Louisiana Truck Stop & Gaming L L C, Appellee, represented by Peter
A. Kopfinger , Kelly Hart Pitre & Louis M. Phillips, Kelly Hart
Pitre.

               About Harold L. Rosbottom

Harold L. Rosbottom, Jr., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 09-11674) on June 9, 2009,
estimating its assets at between $1 million and $10 million. The
petition was signed by Mr. Rosbottom, Jr. Patrick S. Garrity, Esq.,
who has an office in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, serves as the
Debtor’s bankruptcy counsel.


HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC: Settlement Between Trust and L. Mallory OK'd
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned RICHARD ARROWSMITH, as Liquidating Trustee of
the HDL Liquidating Trust, Plaintiff, v. LATONYA S. MALLORY, et
al., Defendants, AP No. 16-03271 (Bankr. E.D. Va.), Bankruptcy
Judge Kevin R. Huennekens granted the motion to approve settlement
agreement filed by Richard Arrowsmith, in his capacity as the
Liquidating Trustee of the HDL Liquidating Trust, seeking approval
of a settlement agreement between the HDL Liquidating Trust and
LaTonya S. Mallory under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure
9019.

Through the Motion, the Liquidating Trustee sought to resolve
claims asserted on behalf of the HDL Liquidating Trust against
Mallory in connection with Mallory's conduct as a former board
member and chief executive officer of Debtor Health Diagnostic
Laboratory, Inc.

The Court holds that settlement of time-consuming, burdensome, and
uncertain litigation -- especially in the bankruptcy context -- is
encouraged. It is incumbent upon the Liquidating Trustee to use his
best efforts to achieve a commercially reasonable and economically
sound resolution of the Litigation Claims in this Bankruptcy Case.
By actively participating in the Plan confirmation process, the
United States clearly acquiesced to the Liquidating Trustee's
authority to prosecute and settle Litigation Claims on behalf of
the estate. As a participant in the confirmed Plan's distribution
scheme and as the holder of the United States' Allowed Claim, the
United States cannot interfere with the implementation of the
confirmed Plan and frustrate the Liquidating Trustee's efforts to
execute his duties thereunder. The Federal Priority Statute is
simply inapplicable to this bankruptcy case. Even if it were
applicable, the Federal Priority Statute would be of no moment, as
none of the Settlement Agreement Assets are recoverable by the
United States in any event.

As the Settlement Agreement is fair and equitable and is in the
best interests of all creditors, including the United States, the
Court approves the Settlement Agreement under Bankruptcy Rule 9019.
Going forward, the United States is encouraged to participate in
the judicial mediation process that the Court has implemented to
resolve the Litigation Claims that remain.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated June 12,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2L2vPEN from Leagle.com.

Richard Arrowsmith, Liquidating Trustee, Plaintiff, represented by
Douglas Paul Lobel --  dlobel@cooley.com -- Cooley LLP & Cullen
Drescher Speckhart -- cspeckhart@wolriv.com -- Wolcott Rivers
Gates.

G. Russell Warnick, Defendant, represented by Dion W. Hayes --
dhayes@mcguirewoods.com -- McGuireWoods LLP.

LaTonya S. Mallory & Scott Mallory, Defendants, represented by
Michael E. Hastings -- hastings@wtplaw.com -- Whiteford Taylor &
Preston LLP & Brandy M. Rapp -- rapp@wtplaw.com -- Whiteford Taylor
& Preston LLP.

Joseph McConnell, Defendant, pro se.

Satyanarain Rangarajan, Defendant, pro se.

Tipton Golias, Robert S. Galen, Noel Bartlett, Helena Laboratories
Corporation, Joseph Golias, Donald Golias, Karla Falgout, Eric
Petersen, David Mayes, John Tessler & Pamela Oates, Defendants,
represented by Matthew D. Foster -- fosterm@pepperlaw.com -- Pepper
Hamilton LLP, Kevin J. Funk -- kfunk@dagglaw.com -- Durrette,
Arkema, Gerson & Gill PC, Daniel T. Moss -- dtmoss@jonesday.com --
JONES DAY, Kevyn D. Orr -- kdorr@jonesday.com -- JONES DAY, Kerri
L. Ruttenberg -- klruttenberg@jonesday.com -- JONES DAY &
tzurawski@jonesday.com --  Jones Day.

Floyd Calhoun Dent, III, Robert Bradford Johnson, Bluewave
Healthcare Consultants, Inc., Hisway of South Carolina, Inc., Royal
Blue Medical Inc., Cobalt Healthcare Consultants Inc., AROC
Enterprises LLC, Riverland Pines LLC, Crosspoint Properties LLC,
Helm-Station Investments LLLP, Lakelin Pines LLC, CAE Properties
LLC, Blue Eagle Farm, LLC, Blue Eagle Farming LLC, Forse Medical
Inc., Forse Investments, LLC, Eagle Ray Investments LLC, War-Horse
Properties, LLLP, H J Farming, LLC, Blue Smash Investments, LLC &
Trini "D" Island LLC, Defendants, represented by Jesse N. Silverman
-- jsilverman@dilworthlaw.com -- Dilworth Paxson LLP.

About Health Diagnostic

Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc., Central Medical Laboratory,
LLC, and Integrated Health Leaders, LLC, are health care businesses
based in Richmond, Virginia. HDL is a blood testing company.

Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No.
15-32919) and affiliates Central Medical Laboratory, LLC (Bankr.
E.D. Va. Case No. 15-32920) and Integrated Health Leaders, LLC
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 15-32921) filed separate Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions on June 7, 2015. The petitions were signed by
Martin McGahan, chief restructuring officer.

HDL disclosed $96,130,468 in assets and $108,328,110 in liabilities
as of the Chapter 11 filing.

Justin F. Paget, Esq., Tyler P. Brown, Esq., Jason W. Harbour,
Esq., and Henry P. (Toby) Long, III, Esq. at Hunton & Williams LLP
serve as the Debtors’ bankruptcy counsel.

Alvarez & Marsal is the Debtors' financial advisor. Robert S.
Westermann, Esq., at Hirshler Fleisher, P.C., serve as the Debtors'
conflicts counsel. American Legal Claims Services, LLC, is the
Debtors' claims, noticing and balloting agent. Ettin Group, LLC,
will market and sell the miscellaneous equipment and other assets.
MTS Health Partners, L.P., serves as investment banker.

To assist them with their restructuring efforts and to help
maximize the value of their estates, the Debtors filed with the
Court an application seeking entry of an order authorizing the
Debtors to retain Alvarez & Marsal Healthcare Industry Group, LLC
("A&M") to provide the Debtors with a Chief Restructuring Officer
and certain additional personnel. Richard Arrowsmith was named the
CRO.

On June 16, 2015, the Office of the United States Trustee for the
Eastern District of Virginia appointed the Committee, consisting of
the following seven members: (i) Oncimmune (USA) LLC; (ii) Aetna,
Inc.; (iii) Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti, LLP; (iv)
Mercodia, Inc.; (v) Numares GROUP Corporation; (vi) Kansas
Bioscience Authority; and (vii) Diadexus, Inc. On Sept. 23, 2015,
Oncimmune (USA) LLC resigned from the Committee and, on Nov. 3,
2015, the U.S. Trustee appointed Cleveland Heart Lab, Inc. to the
Committee. The Creditors Committee retained Cooley LLP as its
counsel and Protiviti Inc. as its financial advisor.

The Debtors have sold substantially all of their operating assets
pursuant to two separate sales approved by the Court. On Jan. 4,
2016, the Debtors filed a proposed Plan of Liquidation and
Disclosure Statement. In May 2016, Judge Kevin R. Huennekens
approved HDL's Modified Second Amended Plan of Liquidation. Richard
Arrowsmith has been named as the permanent Liquidating Trustee of
the Liquidating Trust.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Revises Waiver Agreement with Noteholder
-------------------------------------------------------------
Helios and Matheson Analytics, Inc. has entered into an amendment
to the Waiver Agreement that it entered into on July 10, 2018, with
a holder of the convertible notes issued on Nov. 7, 2017, Jan. 23,
2018, and June 26, 2018, according to a regulatory filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Amendment provides that:

     (i) the waiver of the Company's obligation to effect any
redemption of the Existing Notes as a result of the consummation of
a New Proposed Offering applies only to the extent the redemption
right arises from the occurrence of a Financing between July 11 and
17, 2018;

    (ii) the number of shares permitted to be offered in the New
Proposed Offering was reduced;

   (iii) the number of shares required to be reserved for issuance
upon conversion of the November Notes was increased;

    (iv) the reduction in the number of shares required to be
reserved upon conversion of the November Notes ends when
stockholders approve either an increase in the authorized shares of
common stock or a reverse stock split of the common stock, and if
the Reduction Shares are not issued prior to close of market on
July 17, 2018, the Reduction Shares that are not issued will be
restored to (and increase) the reserve for the November Notes; and

     (v) the deferral of the right that the holders of the Existing
Notes may have to adjust the Conversion Price of the Existing Notes
solely as a result of the issuance of securities in the New
Proposed Offering until the fourth trading day after the time of
the pricing of the New Proposed Offering provided in the Waiver
Agreement was eliminated.

The SEC filing did not disclose the identity of the Holder.

                      $6.8 Million Demand Note

The Company also disclosed that on July 13, 2018, it issued a
demand note to the Holder in the principal amount of $6,806,849,
which includes $5.0 million in cash borrowed by the Company from
the Holder and $1,806,849 required to be paid by the Company to the
Holder pursuant to a partial redemption of the June Notes held by
the Holder.  The Demand Note bears interest on the unpaid principal
amount at the rate of 10.0% per year.  The Holder may make a demand
for full payment of the Demand Note from and after July 17, 2018.
Upon demand, the Company is also required to pay to the Holder any
sum required to cover the costs and expenses incurred by the Holder
in connection with the drafting and negotiation of the Demand Note
as well as all costs and expenses of any enforcement or collection
of the Demand Note, including, without limitation, reasonable
attorneys' fees, expenses and disbursements.

All proceeds received by the Company under its outstanding
at-the-market offering pursuant to the Equity Distribution
Agreement dated as of April 18, 2018 between the Company and
Canaccord Genuity LLC must be used to repay the Demand Note.  The
Demand Note and all accrued interest may be prepaid by the Company
without penalty.  With the agreement of the Holder, principal and
interest accrued on the Demand Note may be applied to all, or any
part, of the purchase price of securities to be issued upon the
consummation, after July 13, 2018, of an offering of securities by
the Company to the Holder.  Any amount of principal or other
amounts due which is not paid when due will result in a late charge
being incurred and payable by the Company to the Holder in an
amount equal to interest on such amount at the rate of 15% per year
from the date such amount was due until the same is paid in full.

The $5.0 million cash proceeds received from the Demand Note will
be used by the Company to pay the Company's merchant and
fulfillment processors.

MoviePass will execute a guaranty pursuant to which MoviePass
guarantees the punctual payment of the Demand Note, including,
without limitation, all principal, interest and other amounts that
accrue after the commencement of any insolvency proceeding of the
Company or MoviePass, whether or not the payment of such interest
and/or other amounts are enforceable or are allowable and agrees to
pay any and all costs and expenses (including counsel fees and
expenses) incurred by the Holder in enforcing any rights under the
MoviePass Demand Note Guaranty or the Demand Note.

                      About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. -- http://www.hmny.com/-- is a
provider of information technology services and solutions, offering
a range of technology platforms focusing on big data, business
intelligence, and consumer-centric technology.  More recently, to
provide greater value to stockholders, the Company has sought to
expand its business primarily through acquisitions that leverage
its capabilities and expertise.  The Company is headquartered in
New York City, has an office in Miami Florida and has an office in
Bangalore India.  The Company's common stock is listed on The
Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "HMNY".

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $150.8 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $7.38 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, the
Company had $177.1 million in total assets, $179.86 million in
total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $2.76
million.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Rosenberg
Rich Baker Berman, P.A., in Somerset, New Jersey, on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows
from operating activities.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Says Cash Deficit Up $45M in June
------------------------------------------------------
Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. disclosed in a regulatory filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that the Company has
postponed its proposed public offering of shares of its common
stock and warrants to purchase shares of its common stock
previously announced on July 10, 2018, pending the Nasdaq Capital
Market completing its review of the Company's listing of additional
shares notification submitted in connection with the offering and
an evaluation of market conditions at such time.

The Company also disclosed that as of June 30, 2018, it had
approximately $13.7 million in available cash and approximately
$32.2 million on deposit with its merchant and fulfillment
processors for a total of approximately $45.9 million.  The funds
held by these processors represent a portion of the payments
received for annual and other extended term MoviePass subscription
plans and future ticket fulfillment, which the Company classifies
as current assets on its balance sheet and which the Company
expects to be disbursed to it or utilized during 2018.

The Company's average monthly cash deficit has been approximately
$26.9 million per month from Sept. 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018
inclusive of its processor deposits.  Due to the Company's greater
than anticipated subscriber growth in June 2018, its cash deficit
for the month of June 2018 is expected to be approximately $45.0
million and the Company anticipates its cash deficit for the month
of July 2018 will be at least $45.0 million due to significant
subscriber growth, increased theater attendance during the summer
months and strong box office results of recently released films.

As the MoviePass subscriber base increases rapidly, and as the
Company increase its investments in movies through MoviePass
Ventures and MoviePass Films, and make other acquisitions, its
monthly cash deficit will continue to increase in the coming
months.

The Company said it will continue to require significant proceeds
from sales of its debt or equity securities, including common stock
pursuant to its ATM Offering, among other sources of capital.
Furthermore, to the extent the Company uses any net proceeds from
sales of its securities for acquisitions of other businesses or
financial interests in additional movies (through its subsidiaries,
MoviePass Ventures or MoviePass Films), the Company will need
additional capital to offset its monthly cash deficit to the extent
resulting from those further investments.  For these reasons, on
July 2, 2018, the Company filed, and on July 5 the Securities and
Exchange Commission declared effective, a registration statement on
Form S-3 for a maximum offering amount of $1.2 billion of its debt
and equity securities.

Beginning May 9, 2018 and through July 5, 2018, the Company has
issued shares of common stock in the ATM Offering pursuant to an
Equity Distribution Agreement dated as of April 18, 2018 between
the Company and Canaccord Genuity LLC; and its November 2017
convertible notes following receipt of prepayments under
corresponding November 2017 investor notes.  Accordingly, during
the period from May 9, 2018 through July 9, 2018, the Company has
issued approximately 111.6 million shares of its common stock and
received gross cash proceeds of approximately $57.1 million from
sales of its common stock pursuant to the Equity Distribution
Agreement.  In addition, during the same period, the Company
received gross proceeds of approximately $28.1 million with respect
to funding of the November 2017 investor notes and issued
approximately 69.8 million shares with respect to the conversion of
its November 2017 convertible notes inclusive of shares related to
the make-whole interest provisions of those notes.

The Company's access to additional equity capital will depend, in
part, on its ability to obtain the requisite stockholder approval
at a special meeting of stockholders, as described in its
definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on July 5, 2018, to
increase its authorized common stock, to effect a reverse stock
split and to issue shares of common stock pursuant to the
convertible notes the Company issued to an institutional investor
in January 2018.  As of July 10, 2018, the Company had 268,749,677
shares outstanding out of its currently authorized 500,000,000
shares of common stock.  

"If we are unable to obtain the requisite stockholder approval of
the Special Meeting Proposals, our access to additional equity
capital, including through our ATM Offering, will be significantly
diminished, until or unless we are able to obtain such approval. In
that case, we would be reliant on seeking non-convertible debt
capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms, if at all,
or voluntary prepayments from our institutional investors under the
investor notes payable to us that we hold totaling $226 million in
aggregate principal amount.

"If we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional
capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned
growth or otherwise alter our business model, objectives and
operations, which could harm our business, financial condition and
operating results," the Company stated in a Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

                      About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. -- http://www.hmny.com/-- is a
provider of information technology services and solutions, offering
a range of technology platforms focusing on big data, business
intelligence, and consumer-centric technology.  More recently, to
provide greater value to stockholders, the Company has sought to
expand its business primarily through acquisitions that leverage
its capabilities and expertise.  The Company is headquartered in
New York City, has an office in Miami Florida and has an office in
Bangalore India.  The Company's common stock is listed on The
Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol "HMNY".

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $150.8 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $7.38 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, the
Company had $177.1 million in total assets, $179.86 million in
total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $2.76
million.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Rosenberg
Rich Baker Berman, P.A., in Somerset, New Jersey, on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows
from operating activities.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


HOUSTON BLUEBONNET: JPMorgan et al.'s Informal Claims Equitable
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned HOUSTON BLUEBONNET, L.L.C.,
Appellant, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, LLOYD BENTSEN, III, HENRY R.
HAMMAN, GEORGE AND MARY JOSEPHINE HAMMAN FOUNDATION, LAURA HAMMAN
FAIN, AND ELIZABETH HAMMAN OLIVER, Appellees, Civil Action No.
H-17-3270 (S.D. Tex.), Houston Bluebonnet appeals from an order
granting Movants' Motion for Approval and Determining Their
Informal Proofs of Claim Lack Prima Facie Validity, signed October
10, 2017. Upon review, District Judge Sim Lake affirms the
bankruptcy court's order.

The issue on appeal is whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in
granting Appellees' joint motion to treat certain documents and
filings as informal proofs of claim.

Appellant argues that the Bankruptcy Court abused its discretion by
analyzing the fifth prong of the Nikoloutsos test -- whether
allowance of the claim would be equitable under the circumstances
-- by focusing solely on the effect that not recognizing Appellees'
informal claims would have had upon the Appellees. Asserting that
"[t]he Bankruptcy Court balances this effect against the fact that
Houston Bluebonnet had notice of the state law causes of action
against it," Appellant argues that "[b]y focusing on notice in
analyzing the equitable prong, the Bankruptcy Court failed to
address Houston Bluebonnet's equitable considerations, whichare
significant." Appellant argues that equities the Bankruptcy Court
failed to consider include the fact that the Appellees are
represented by well-qualified counsel and were well aware of the
Bar Date but waited until the eve of the disclosure statement
hearing to take any action regarding their potential, unfiled
claims. Citing In re Egan, 526 B.R. 111, 114 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
2015), Appellant argues that "[w] hen considering the equitable
prong, courts are less likely to use the informal proof of claim
doctrine when a creditor is represented by counsel and when
permission of the informal claim `would significantly affect the
payout to creditors with timely filed claims.'" Appellant argues
that "[b]oth of these considerations weigh against the allowance of
an informal claim."Appellant argues that it has been able to raise
sufficient funds to pay its creditors in full based on the
assumption that the Appellees were not filing proofs of claim, and
that recognition of their informal proofs of claim would unfairly
delay resolution of the bankruptcy case by making its filed plan
infeasible, and sending it back to the drawing board on its plan
and disclosure statement.

Appellant's argument that it has been able to raise sufficient
funds to pay its creditors in full based on the assumption that the
Appellees were not filing proofs of claim, and that recognition of
Appellees' informal proofs of claim would unfairly delay resolution
of the bankruptcy case by making its filed plan infeasible, weighs
only slightly in favor of Appellant because Appellant has neither
argued nor presented any evidence capable of establishing that the
Debtor or any other creditors will be prejudiced by recognition of
the Appellees' informal proofs of claims. If the Appellees' claims
have merit, disallowing them would create a windfall for the
remaining creditors, and if the claims have no merit, the Debtor
will still have the opportunity to object to them, and the
Bankruptcy Court will have the opportunity to deny them. Under
these circumstances, the court concludes that the Bankruptcy Court
did not abuse its discretion by concluding that recognition of the
Appellees' informal proofs of claims is equitable.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
June 14, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2J6V07b from
Leagle.com.

Houston Bluebonnet, L.L.C, Appellant, represented by Gary Eugene
Ellison, Attorney at Law, H. Miles Cohn -- mcohn@craincaton.com --
Crain, Caton & James, P.C., Michelle Valadares Friery, Crain, Caton
& James, P.C. & Tina Louann Snelling.

Houston Bluebonnet, L.L.C, Appellant, represented by H. Miles Cohn,
Crain, Caton & James, P.C. & Michelle Valadares Friery, Crain,
Caton & James, P.C.

JPMorgan Chase Bank, Independent Co-Exeuctor of the Estate of Jane
Japhet Guinn, Lloyd Bentsen, III, Independent Co-Exeuctor of the
Estate of Jane Japhet Guinn, Henry R. Hamman, George and Mary
Josephine Hamman Foundation, Laura Hamman Fain & Elizabeth Hamman
Oliver, Appellees, represented by Barnet B. Skelton, Jr. , Attorney
at Law & Lee S. Gill -- gill@jonesgill.com -- Jones Gill LLP.

JP Morgan Chase Bank and Lloyd Bentsen, III, Independent
Co-Executors of the Estate of Jane Japhet Guinn, successor in
interest of the Jane Guinn Revocable Trust, Perry B. Menking, Jr.,
successor in interest of the Perry B. Menking, Jr. Investment
Management Trust, Lynn Sahin, Kate Lukin Bruno, successor in
interest of the Wesley Lutkin Grantor Trust, Wesley Lutkin Bruno,
successor in interest of the Wesley Lutkin Grantor Trust, Daniel R.
Japhet, Gretchen Japhet, Susan Japhet Scotty & Larkin Japhet
Sutherland, Appellees, represented by Barnet B. Skelton, Jr. ,
Attorney at Law.

                  About Houston Bluebonnet

Houston Bluebonnet, LLC, is a Texas limited liability company
formed Dec. 5, 2007. Houston Bluebonnet owns and manages a working
interest in two producing oil and gas wells under an operating
agreement for an oil, gas and mineral lease covering 20 acres in
Brazoria County, Texas. The value of its working interest
fluctuates with the price of oil. As of the filing of this
bankruptcy case, the Company valued its working interest at
$90,000, based on the tax-assessed value calculated from the sales
in 2015.

Houston Bluebonnet filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 16-34850) on Sept. 30, 2016. In the petition signed
by Allyson Davis, authorized representative, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.

H. Miles Cohn, Esq., at Crain, Caton & James, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel. Gary E. Ellison, PC, and Snelling Law
Firm serve as special counsel.


ICONIX BRAND: Signs General Release and Waiver with Former CEO
--------------------------------------------------------------
Iconix Brand Group, Inc. and John Haugh entered into a release on
July 9, 2018, substantially in the form provided for in his
employment agreement.  In accordance with the terms of his release,
the Company will pay Mr. Haugh the severance payments and benefits
described in his employment agreement as if he had been terminated
by the Company without "Cause".

On June 15, 2018, Mr. Haugh resigned from his positions as chief
executive officer and president of Iconix Brand and resigned from
the Company's board of directors.

Mr. Haugh will also be subject to a non-compete through June 15,
2020 in accordance with his employment agreement.

                       About Iconix Brand

Broadway, New York-based Iconix Brand Group, Inc. --
http://www.iconixbrand.com/-- is a brand management company and
owner of a diversified portfolio of over 30 global consumer brands
across the women's, men's, entertainment, home and international
segments.  The Company's business strategy is to maximize the value
of its brands primarily through strategic licenses and joint
venture partnerships around the world, as well as to grow the
portfolio of brands through strategic acquisitions.  Iconix Brand
owns, licenses and markets a portfolio of consumer brands
including: Candie's, Bongo, Joe Boxer, Rampage, Mudd, London Fog,
Mossimo, Ocean Pacific/OP, Danskin/Danskin Now, Rocawear/Roc
Nation, Cannon, Royal Velvet, Fieldcrest, Charisma, Starter,
Waverly, Ecko Unltd/Mark Ecko Cut & Sew, Zoo York, Umbro, Lee
Cooper, and Artful Dodger; and interests in Material Girl, Ed
Hardy, Truth or Dare, Modern Amusement, Buffalo, Hydraulic, and
PONY.

Iconix Brand incurred a net loss attributable to the Company of
$489.3 million in 2017, a net loss attributable to the Company of
$252.1 million in 2016 and a net loss attributable to the Company
of $186.5 million in 2015.  As of March 31, 2018, Iconix Brand had
$852.4 million in total assets, $832.5 million in total
liabilities, $29.79 million in redeemable non-controlling interest
and a $9.86 million total stockholders' deficit.

The Company stated in its 2017 Annual Report that due to certain
developments, including the decision by Target Corporation not to
renew the existing Mossimo license agreement following its
expiration in October 2018 and by Walmart, Inc. not to renew the
existing Danskin Now license agreement following its expiration in
January 2019, and the Company's revised forecasted future earnings,
the Company forecasted that it would unlikely be in compliance with
certain of its financial debt covenants in 2018 and that it may
otherwise face possible liquidity challenges in 2018.  The Company
said these factors raised substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.  The Company's ability to continue as
a going concern is dependent on its ability to raise additional
capital and implement its business plan.


INTELSAT SA: Moody's Alters Outlook to Stable & Affirms Caa2 CFR
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A.'s
(Intelsat) ratings outlook to stable from negative and affirmed
Intelsat's Caa2 corporate family rating (CFR), Caa3-PD probability
of default rating (PRD), and ratings for all debt instruments in
the Intelsat corporate family:

Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A.'s senior unsecured notes were affirmed
at Ca; Intelsat Connect Finance S.A.'s senior unsecured notes were
affirmed at Ca; Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A.'s guaranteed senior
secured term loan B was affirmed at B1, its senior secured notes
were affirmed at B1, and its unsecured notes were affirmed at Caa2.


The outlook change results from Moody's assessment that the
company's liquidity profile and lack of near term, junior-ranking
debt maturities, reduces the potential of near term material
liability management transactions which could be assessed as
limited defaults. That said, the Caa3-PD affirmation is based on
continuing expectations of elevated default risks over the
mid-term. The Caa2 CFR affirmation is based on enterprise value
considerations that moderate expected losses such that the CFR is
one notch higher than the PDR.

The following summarizes Moody's ratings and the rating actions for
Intelsat:

Issuer: Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A.

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed at Caa2

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed at Caa3-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed at SGL-3

Outlook, Changed to Stable from Negative

Issuer: Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A.

GTD Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed at Ca (LGD5)


Issuer: Intelsat Connect Finance S.A.

GTD Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed at Ca (LGD4)


Issuer: Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A.

GTD Senior Secured Bank Credit Facilities, Affirmed at B1 (LGD1)

GTD Senior Secured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed at B1 (LGD1)

GTD Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Affirmed at Caa2
(LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

Intelsat's Caa2 rating is based primarily on Moody's assessment
that the company's capital structure is not sustainable, with
elevated leverage and the potential of excess supply and sustained
cash flow pressure stemming from evolving industry fundamentals
combining to increase the potential of debt restructurings, that
may be assessed as constituting distressed exchanges and limited
defaults. Moody's-adjusted debt/EBITDA exceeds 9x, and evolving
fundamentals cause cash flow visibility beyond the next year or so
to be poor. Intelsat's rating benefits from the company's good
scale, large revenue backlog, and sufficient liquidity to navigate
through the next year.

Intelsat's SGL-3 speculative grade liquidity rating indicates
adequate liquidity based on the company being approximately cash
flow break-even over the next four-to-six quarters, and holding
approximately $500 million of cash to fund transitory cash flow
deficits that may arise in interim periods. Intelsat relies on cash
in lieu of an accessible third party provided revolving credit
facility. Estimated compliance cushion with financial covenants in
the company's term loan is about 10%. If not refinanced in advance
of becoming a current obligation, Intelsat Jackson's 7.25% senior
unsecured notes due October 2020 will roll into Moody's rolling
forward four quarter SGL window in mid-2019, with the SGL rating
subject to downgrade shortly before or at approximately the same
time.

Moody's general practice is to locate corporate-level ratings at
the senior most legal entity in the corporate structure for which
Moody's maintains debt instrument ratings, i.e., Intelsat
(Luxembourg) S.A. (an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Intelsat
S.A., the senior-most entity in the Intelsat group of companies,
and the only company in the family issuing financial statements.
Intelsat S.A. guarantees debts at its subsidiary, Intelsat
(Luxembourg) S.A. and, as well, at Intelsat (Luxembourg)'s
subsidiary, Intelsat Connect Finance S.A., and its subsidiary,
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A. (Jackson). Moody's refers to family
level ratings and outlook assigned at Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A. as
Intelsat.

Rating Outlook

The stable outlook is based on Moody's assessment that there is a
limited potential of near term material liability management
transactions which could be assessed as limited defaults.

What Could Change the Rating - Up

The rating could be considered for upgrade if, along with
expectations of solid industry fundamentals, good liquidity, and
clarity on capital structure planning, Moody's anticipated:

Leverage of debt/EBITDA normalizing below 6x on a sustained basis;


Cash flow self-sustainability over the life cycle of the company's
satellite fleet.

What Could Change the Rating -- Down

The rating could be considered for downgrade if, Moody's expected:


Near-term defaults; or

Substantial and sustained free cash flow deficits; or

Less than adequate liquidity arrangements.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Communications
Infrastructure Industry published in September 2017.

Headquartered in Luxembourg, and with executive offices in McLean,
VA, Intelsat (Luxembourg) S.A. (Intelsat) is one of the two largest
fixed satellite services operators in the world. Annual revenues
are expected to be approximately $2.2 billion with EBITDA of
approximately $1.6 billion.



JOYFULL RIDE: May Use Medallion Trust Cash Collateral Thru Nov. 7
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts entered an Agreed Order authorizing
Joyfull Ride, Inc., MISH, Inc. and Southside Enterprises, Inc. to
use cash collateral in the ordinary course of business through
November 7, 2018.

As adequate protection for the Member Debtors' use of cash
collateral, and supplemental to adequate protection grants provided
in prior Cash Collateral Orders:

     (a) Medallion Trust is granted a Replacement Lien in and to
all property of the kind presently securing the Member Debtors'
obligations to the Medallion Trust, but only to the extent of the
validity, perfection, priority, sufficiency and enforceability of
Medallion Trust's pre-petition security interests and not more than
any postpetition diminution of the value of the Medallion Trust's
interest in such property. Said lien will specifically not extend
to any post-petition avoidance recoveries.

     (b) The Member Debtors will make monthly adequate protection
payments to Medallion Trust in the amounts reflected on the
Proposed Budget. The payments will be made without prejudice to the
parties' rights as to the characterization of such payments as
principal, interest or costs and no allocation will be made without
further Court order.

     (c) Each Member Debtor will continue to maintain its assets,
and will not diminish the position of Medallion Trust.

     (d) Each Member Debtor will supply Medallion Trust with all of
the operating statements filed with the U.S. Trustee and other
financial information as reasonably requested by the Medallion
Trust, including proof of insurance on the taxis owned by the
Debtors.

     (e) Medallion Trust specifically preserves and reserves its
objections as well as its right to raise any additional objections
to the Member Debtors' use of cash collateral beyond the period
agreed as set forth in the Agreed Order.

A continued hearing on the use of cash collateral is set for
November 7, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

The Member Debtors will file reconciliations to the applicable
monthly budget on or before the 15th day of the next ensuing
month.

A full-text copy of the Agreed Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-11617-113.pdf

                       About Joyfull Ride

Jointly administered debtors Joyfull Ride, Inc., June 16, Inc.,
MISH, Inc., Royal Transportation Services, Inc., and Southside
Enterprises, Inc., filed their respective Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case Nos. 17-11617, 17-11620, 17-11621, 17-11622
and 17-11623, respectively) on May 1, 2017.  The petitions were
signed by Selim Romanos, its president.

At the time of filing, Joyfull Ride had $50,000 to $100,000 in
estimated assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in estimated liabilities;
Royal Transportation had less than $50,000 in estimated assets and
$100,000 to $500,000 in estimated liabilities; while June 16, Inc.,
MISH, Inc. and Southside Enterprises had $100,000 to $500,000 in
estimated assets and $500,000 to $1 million 000 in estimated
liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Frank J. Bailey.

The Debtors are represented by John F. Sommerstein, Esq., at the
Law Offices of John F. Sommerstein.


JUNE 16 INC: May Use Radius Bank Cash Collateral Until November 7
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts has entered an Agreed Order authorizing
June 16, Inc. to use cash collateral in the ordinary course of its
respective business through November 7, 2018.

As adequate protection for June 16, Inc.'s use of cash collateral,
and supplemental to adequate protection grants provided in prior
Court Orders:

     (a) Radius Bank is granted a Replacement Lien in and to all
property of the kind presently securing June 16, Inc.'s obligations
to the Radius Bank, but only to the extent of the validity,
perfection, priority, sufficiency and enforceability of Radius
Bank's pre-petition security interests and not more than any
postpetition diminution of the value of the Radius Bank's interest
in such property.  The lien will specifically not extend to any
post-petition avoidance recoveries.

     (b) June 16, Inc. will make monthly adequate protection
payments to Radius Bank in the amounts reflected on the Proposed
Budget. The payments will be made without prejudice to the parties'
rights as to the characterization of such payments as principal,
interest or costs and no allocation will be made without further
Court order.

     (c) June 16, Inc. will continue to maintain its assets, and
will not diminish the position of Radius Bank.

     (d) June 16, Inc. will supply Radius Bank with all of the
operating statements filed with the U.S. Trustee and such other
financial information as reasonably requested by Radius Bank,
including proof of insurance on the taxis owned by the Debtors.

     (e) Radius Bank has reserved any objections to June 16, Inc.'s
use of cash collateral beyond the period agreed as set forth in the
Agreed Order.

A continued hearing on use of cash collateral is set for November
7, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

June 16, Inc. will file reconciliations to the applicable monthly
budget on or before the 15th day of the next ensuing month.

A full-text copy of the Agreed Order is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-11617-112.pdf

                       About Joyfull Ride

Jointly administered debtors Joyfull Ride, Inc., June 16, Inc.,
MISH, Inc., Royal Transportation Services, Inc., and Southside
Enterprises, Inc., filed their respective Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case Nos. 17-11617, 17-11620, 17-11621, 17-11622
and 17-11623, respectively) on May 1, 2017.  The petitions were
signed by Selim Romanos, president.

At the time of filing, Joyfull Ride had $50,000 to $100,000 in
estimated assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in estimated liabilities;
Royal Transportation had less than $50,000 in estimated assets and
$100,000 to $500,000 in estimated liabilities; while June 16, Inc.,
MISH, Inc. and Southside Enterprises had $100,000 to $500,000 in
estimated assets and $500,000 to $1 million 000 in estimated
liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Frank J. Bailey.  

The Debtors are represented by John F. Sommerstein, Esq., at the
Law Offices of John F. Sommerstein.


KCST USA: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral Through Sept. 30
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Elizabeth D. Katz of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts authorized KCST USA, Inc. to use cash
collateral substantially in accordance with the court-approved
budget during the period from July 1, 2018 through September 30,
2018.

The Court also extended the maturity date of the DIP Loan Facility
to September 30, 2018.  The terms and conditions of the DIP Loan
remains the same.  The maximum borrowing under the DIP Loan
Facility will be $800,000.

The Debtor acknowledges its indebtedness to Axia Net Media Corp.
("ANMC") and that ANMC is granted Liens on certain assets pursuant
to the DIP Financing Orders.

ANMC has consented to the Debtor's use of cash collateral during
the Budget Period.  ANMC will continue to have, pursuant to the DIP
Financing Orders, a valid and perfected security interest in, and
lien on the collateral, including the cash collateral and the
proceeds thereof, as approved and provided for in the DIP Financing
Orders.  ANMC will expressly have no lien on causes of action
brought pursuant to Sections 506(c), 544, 547, 548 and 549 of the
Code and recoveries upon such causes of action.

Each of the security interests and other liens granted to ANMC will
in any way prime or affect the rights, if any, of Westchester Fire
Insurance Company ("Surety") as to: (a) any funds it is holding
and/or being held for it presently or in the future whether in
trust, as security, or otherwise, (b) any substitutions or
replacements of said funds including accretions to and interest
earned on said funds, and (c) any letter of credit related to any
indemnity, collateral trust, or related agreements between Surety
and the Debtor.

To the extent that any Surety Assets are being held by the Debtor
and are used by the Debtor as part of cash collateral, a
concomitant replacement trust claim or replacement lien shall be
granted to the Surety equal to the amount of the use of those funds
with any replacement trust fund claim to be equal to the amount of
trust funds used, and any replacement lien to have the same
priority, amount, extent and validity as existed as of the Petition
Date.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-40501-190.pdf

                     About KCST USA, Inc.

KCST USA, Inc., based in Concord, Mass., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 17-40501) on March 22, 2017. In
the petition signed by Terrence Fergus, its president, the Debtor
estimated $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $10 million to $50
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Elizabeth D. Katz presides over
the case.  Andrew G. Lizotte, Esq., and Harold B. Murphy, Esq., at
Murphy & King, P.C., serve as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.
Stephen Darr of Huron Consulting Services, LLC, is the chief
restructuring officer.


LA STEEL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: LA Steel Services, Inc., a California corporation
        1760 California Avenue, Suite 201
        Corona, CA 92881

Business Description: LA Steel Services, Inc. is a construction
                      company in Corona, California, specializing
                      in heavy highway & bridge construction and
                      public/civil works infrastructure.  The
                      company also offers reinforcing steel design
                      consultations, value engineering, and
                      constructability review.  Visit
                      http://www.lasteelservices.comfor more
                      information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Riverside)

Case No.: 18-15841

Judge: Hon. Mark D. Houle

Debtor's Counsel: James C. Bastian, Jr., Esq.
                  SHULMAN HODGES & BASTIAN LLP
                  100 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 100
                  Irvine, CA 92618
                  Tel: 949-340-3400
                  Email: jbastian@shbllp.com

Total Assets: $5.15 million

Total Liabilities: $3.51 million

The petition was signed by Pamela Lee Albright, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

    https://www.scribd.com/document/383765399/cacb18-15841


LAURA ELSHEIMER: Bid to Use Cash Collateral Now Moot Amid Sale
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Christopher J. Panos of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts cancelled the hearing scheduled for June
21, 2018, regarding Laura Elsheimer LLC's request for authority to
use cash collateral.  The Court said the request is already moot
given the sale of the Debtor's property.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on May 10, 2018, Laura
Elsheimer filed a notice of its intended private sale of the real
property located at 20-24 Main Street/3 Felton Street, Hudson,
Massachusetts to James & June Realty II, LLC for $995,000, subject
to higher and better offers. The sale was scheduled to take place
on May 21.

                      About Laura Elsheimer

Headquartered in Hudson, Massachusetts, Laura Elsheimer LLC filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No.
17-41842) on Oct. 11, 2017, estimating its assets and liabilities
at between $500,001 and $1 million.  Michael Van Dam, Esq., at Van
Dam Law LLP, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Law
Offices of Paul V. Giannetti, is the special counsel.


MARBLE MASTERS: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral Until August 31
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Austin E. Carter of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Georgia has signed an interim order authorizing
Marble Masters of Middle Georgia, Inc. to use cash collateral in
the ordinary course of business to make disbursements in accordance
with the projected budget until and including August 31, 2018.

The Debtor has established a Debtor-In-Possession Bank Account at
State Bank and Trust, which account complies with all applicable
requirements of the U.S. Trustee.  Accordingly, the Debtor will
collect, deposit and maintain all cash collateral received on or
after the Petition Date in the Cash Collateral Account pursuant to
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Once deposited, the Debtor will
not co-mingle the cash collateral with any other monies the Debtor
may happen to collect or receive.

As of May 11, 2018, Renasant Bank, as successor-by-merger with
Heritage Bank of the South held a secured claim in the amount of
$355,218.22 against which the Debtor has no defenses or right of
set-off. Renasant Bank's allowed claim is secured by:

     (a) A first priority security interest in all fixtures located
at 1105 North Davis Drive, Warner Robins, Georgia, together with
all accessions, attachments, accessories, parts, tools, supplies,
replacements of and additions thereto;

     (b) A first priority security interest in all accounts, rents,
monies, payments and all rights to payment, whether or not earned
by performance;

     (c) A first position priority security interest in all deposit
accounts;

     (d) A first priority security interest in all contract rights,
instruments, documents, chattel paper and general intangibles;

     (e) An interest in the real estate know as 1105 North Davis
Drive, Warner Robins, Georgia; and

     (f) All products and proceeds of each of the foregoing.

Renasant Bank is granted a replacement lien nunc pro tunc on and in
all property of similar type and nature as the Renasant's
Collateral, which the Debtor acquires or generates after the
Petition Date.  The lien will:

      (a) secure the return to Renasant Bank of its Collateral,
including all cash and non-cash collateral utilized by the Debtor
pursuant to the Interim Order;

      (b) where the lien constitutes a first lien, have priority
over any and all claims and expenses in this case;

      (c) be subordinate only to enforceable and perfected liens
and security interests in existence at the time this case was
commenced with a priority senior of the security interest in favor
of Renasant Bank; and

      (d) secure all indebtedness of the Debtor to Renasant Bank
incurred pursuant to the Interim  Order.

To the extent that all liens granted on the post-petition assets of
the Debtor in favor of Renasant Bank pursuant to the Interim Order
are insufficient to compensate Renasant Bank in full for the
post-petition amounts due by Debtor or any subsequent trustee of
the Debtor's Estate, Renasant Bank is granted an administrative
expense priority claim with priority over all administrative
expenses of any kind whatsoever incurred in this reorganization,
except for an administrative expenses priority claim arising under
a Chapter 7 case and the Chapter 11 quarterly fees owed to the U.S.
Trustee.

In addition, the Debtor will pay to Renasant Bank the sum of
$2,382.57 per month as an adequate protection payment until further
Order of the Court or until confirmation of a Plan in this case,
whichever event occurs first.

During the pendency of this case, the Debtor will:

     (a) keep Renasant's Collateral insured with an insurance
carrier and for coverage amounts that are acceptable to Renasant
Bank;

     (b) properly care for the Renasant's Collateral;

     (c) identify Renasant Bank as the sole loss payee relate to
the insurance policy covering the Renasant's Collateral;

     (d) deduct, relative to the insurance policy covering
Renasant's Collateral, an amount not exceeding $2,500 per accident
or event of loss;

     (e) permit Renasant Bank to inspect, audit or otherwise
examine the books, records and premises of the Debtor. Renasant
Bank will have full and complete access to all financial records of
the Debtor; and

     (f) transmit to Renasant Bank copies of all reports, financial
or otherwise, including but not limited to Monthly Operating
Reports.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb18-50891-47.pdf

               About Marble Masters of Middle Georgia

Marble Masters of Middle Georgia, Inc., d/b/a ISD Cabinets & Supply
-- https://www.marblemasters.com/ -- specializes in the
installation, restoration and maintenance of marble, granite, and
quartz surfaces for residential and commercial clients.
Headquartered in Warner Robins, Georgia, the Company handles new
construction or makeover projects.

Marble Masters sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 18-50891) on May 11, 2018. In the
petition signed by Neil D. Suggs, managing member, the Debtor
estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in debt. The Hon. Austin E. Carter presides the case.
Wesley J. Boyer, Esq., at Boyer Law Firm, L.L.C., is the Debtor's
counsel; and William A. Amos, PC, as accountant.


MESOBLAST LIMITED: Shawn Cline Tomasello on Board as Director
-------------------------------------------------------------
Shawn Cline Tomasello has joined Mesoblast Limited's Board of
Directors.  With more than 30 years' experience in the
pharmaceutical and biotech industries, Ms. Tomasello brings
substantial commercial and transactional experience to the
Mesoblast board.

Since 2015, Ms Tomasello has been chief commercial officer at
immuno-oncology cell therapy company Kite Pharma, where she played
a pivotal role in the company's acquisition in 2017 by Gilead
Sciences for $11.9 billion.  Prior to this she served as chief
commercial officer at Pharmacyclics, Inc., which was acquired in
2015 by AbbVie, Inc. for $21 billion.  Ms. Tomasello previously was
president of the Americas, Hematology and Oncology at Celgene
Corporation where she managed over $4 billion in product revenues,
and was instrumental in various global expansion and acquisition
strategies.  She has also held senior positions at Genentech,
Pfizer Laboratories, Miles Pharmaceuticals and Procter & Gamble. Ms
Tomasello currently serves on the Board of Directors of Centrexion
Therapeutics, Oxford BioTherapeutics and Diplomat Rx.

Commenting on her appointment, Ms Tomasello said, "I have been
extremely impressed by Mesoblast's technology and the rigor with
which the company has moved its programs towards commercialization.
Mesoblast's cellular medicines have the potential to make a
substantial impact on the treatment of life-threatening conditions
in a way not possible with traditional approaches.  I look forward
to making an important contribution to Mesoblast's commercial and
strategic objectives."

Mesoblast Chief Executive Dr. Silviu Itescu stated: "Shawn's
substantial commercial experience will be invaluable to the
Mesoblast product launch team as we transition to a
commercial-stage company.  As important, Shawn's unparalleled
transactional experience will greatly strengthen our ability to
execute on our strategic objectives."

Ignite Partners advised Mesoblast on the appointment of Ms
Tomasello.

                      About Mesoblast

Headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, Mesoblast Limited (ASX:MSB;
Nasdaq:MESO) -- http://www.mesoblast.com/-- is a global developer
of innovative cell-based medicines.  The Company has leveraged its
proprietary technology platform, which is based on specialized
cells known as mesenchymal lineage adult stem cells, to establish a
broad portfolio of late-stage product candidates.  Mesoblast's
allogeneic, 'off-the-shelf' cell product candidates target advanced
stages of diseases with high, unmet medical needs including
cardiovascular conditions, orthopedic disorders, immunologic and
inflammatory disorders and oncologic/hematologic conditions.

Mesoblast Limited reported a net loss before income tax of US$90.21
million for the year ended June 30, 2017, a net loss before income
tax of US$90.82 million for the year ended June 30, 2016, and a net
loss before income tax of US$96.24 million for the year ended June
30, 2015.  As of March 31, 2018, Mesoblast had US$677.85 million in
total assets, US$121.72 million in total liabilities and US$556.13
million in total equity.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, in Melbourne, Australia, issued a "going
concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended June 30, 2017, noting that Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


MFL INC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: MFL Inc.
           aka Memory Foam Liquidators Inc.
           aka AAA Custom Services
        7215 SW Topeka Blvd, Bldg. A
        Topeka, KS 66619

Business Description: Headquartered in Topeka, Kansas, MFL Inc. is
                      in the foams and rubber business.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Kansas (Kansas City)

Case No.: 18-21422

Debtor's Counsel: Justice B. King, Esq.
                  FISHER, PATTERSON, SAYLER & SMITH, LLP
                  3550 S.W. Fifth Street
                  Topeka, KS 66606
                  Tel: (785) 232-7761
                  Fax: (785) 232-6604
                  Email: jking@fisherpatterson.com

Total Assets: $1.34 million

Total Liabilities: $1.91 million

The petition was signed by Christopher D. Farmer, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

     https://www.scribd.com/document/383770836/ksb18-21422


MILLWASP REALTY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Millwasp Realty LLC
        69-27 66th Road
        Middle Village, NY 11379

Business Description: Millwasp Realty LLC owns in fee simple mixed
                      use buildings located at 222 Bay Street
                      Staten Island, NY 10301 and 224 Bay Street
                      Staten Island, NY 10301 having an aggregate
                      current value of $2 million.  The Company
                      previously sought bankruptcy protection on
                      March 7, 2011 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
                      11-41783) and June 21, 2013 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
                      Case No. 13-43811).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Case No.: 18-44034

Judge: Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord

Debtor's Counsel: Mark R. Bernstein, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY MESSER, PLLC
                  26 Court Street, Suite 2400
                  Brooklyn, NY 11242
                  Tel: (718) 858-1474
                  Fax: (718) 797-5360
                  Email: mbernstein@messer-law.com

Total Assets: $2 million

Total Liabilities: $996,807

The petition was signed by Jill Sorrentino, managing member.

The Debtor stated it has no unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

                    http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-44034.pdf


MLLD TRUCKING: 2nd Amended Chapter 11 Plan Filed
------------------------------------------------
MLLD Trucking, LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nebraska its second amended Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

Under the plan, the allowed Class 2A secured claim of Giltner State
Bank will be deferred until the terms and conditions of the MLLD
Farms, Inc. and Mark and Lori Dobish plan and term payments are
made.

Giltner, which holds a security interest in certain equipment owned
by MLLD Trucking, asserts a secured claim of $91,428.21.

The allowed Class 2B secured claim of Element Financial Corp./ECN
Capital, will be paid over seven years at the Till rate of 6.5%,
with annual payments to be reamortized to commence the first year
following the date of confirmation of the plan.  Element Financial,
which holds a security interest in a personal property, asserts a
claim in the amount of $50,980.

Lease Consultants Corp.'s allowed Class 2C secured claim will be
amortized over seven years at the Till rate of 6.5%, with annual
payments to be reamortized to commence the first year following
confirmation of the plan.  The creditor asserts a claim in the
amount of $5,810.

The allowed Class 2D secured claim of Home Federal Savings & Loan
Assn. of Grand Island will be amortized over seven years at the
Till rate of 6.5% with annual payments to be reamortized to
commence the first year following confirmation of the plan.  Home
Federal filed a secured claim in the amount of $12,248.47.  

Meanwhile, MLLD Trucking expects that there will be no disposable
income for payment of unsecured claims, according to the second
amended Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

                     About MLLD Trucking LLC

MLLD Trucking, LLC is a motor carrier located in Pleasanton,
Nebraska.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Neb. Case No. 17-41612) on October 12, 2017.  Mark
A. Dobish, its president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$500,000.

Judge Thomas L. Saladino presides over the case.  Wolfe, Snowden,
Hurd, Luers & Ahl, LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.


NAVISTAR FINANCIAL: Moody's Rates $400MM Term Loan 'Ba3'
--------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to the secured $400
million term loan of Navistar Financial Corporation (NFC). Proceeds
will be used to fund a $150 million distribution to NFC affiliates
and to repay outstanding debt. Prior to this assignment, NFC's debt
was unrated by Moody's. The ratings of NFC's parent, Navistar
International Corporation (Navistar), are unaffected and remain at:
Corporate Family Rating (CFR) -- B3; senior subordinated -- Caa2;
senior unsecured -- Caa1; secured term loan (issued by Navistar,
Inc.) -- Ba3; and, Speculative Grade Liquidity rating -- SGL-3. The
outlook for Navistar and NFC is positive.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba3 rating of NFC's term loan reflects the high quality of the
company's receivable portfolio, and the considerable coverage that
the resulting security package affords to the obligations. NFC's
principal function is providing wholesale floor plan financing to
Navistar's dealer network. For the second quarter ending April 30,
2018, NFC had $1.6 billion of total assets that consists
principally of wholesale receivables. This portfolio has maintained
very modest levels of past due accounts and charge-offs through the
2009 financial crisis and the 2016 decline in the North American
truck market. This sound portfolio quality is supported by the
strength of Navistar's dealer network which generates the majority
of its profits through the sale of parts and services. In addition,
dealers commonly take wholesale delivery of trucks from Navistar
based on the existence of firm customer orders.

NFC's strong receivable portfolio affords adequate asset coverage
for the $400 million term loan even after giving consideration for
the company's approximately $900 million in asset-backed securities
(ABS).

NFC's principal liquidity source is the pro forma availability of
$230 million under a $269 million revolving credit facility. This
facility provides weak liquidity coverage for the approximately
$750 million in ABS that mature over the coming twelve months.
Although these maturing obligations are self-liquidating and pose
no default risk for NFC, the company requires ongoing sources of
new capital in order to maintain the size of its portfolio and
thereby fund new wholesale loans to dealers. The high quality of
NFC's receivable portfolio facilitates its ability to access the
ABS markets and thereby raise new capital as needed. Nevertheless,
Moody's views the NFC's liquidity position as weak.

The positive outlook for Navistar and NFC reflects the parent
company's prospects for continuing to strengthen its credit metrics
based on: 1) the renewal of its truck and bus portfolio; 2) the
resulting growth in market share; and 3) the improved demand
conditions for medium and heavy duty trucks in North America. The
outlook is also supported by the strategic ties between Navistar
and Volkswagen Truck and Bus (VWT&B) which has taken a 16.9%
ownership position in Navistar.

There is a close strategic and operating relationship between
Navistar and NFC, that includes a modest support agreement from the
parent for the benefit of the finance operation. The agreement
requires Navistar to maintain NFC's fixed charge coverage at no
less than 1.25x; no payments from Navistar have been required
during any of the past three years. In addition to this business
and financial relationship, there are also cross default provisions
in Navistar's and NFC's term loans. As a result of these factors,
Navistar and NFC have equivalent levels of risk with respect to
probability of default. This probability of default risk is
reflected in the B3 CFR that covers both Navistar and NFC. However,
the Ba3 rating of NFC's $400 million secured term loan reflects the
asset coverage and recovery prospects afforded by the finance
company's receivable portfolio. Conversely, the Ba3 rating of
Navistar's secured $1.6 billion term loan reflects the capital
structure and asset value of the manufacturing operations. NFC's
Ba3 secured term loan rating is not pegged to or driven by the
rating level of Navistar's secured term loan. Consequently, the
ratings of these two obligations could diverge in the future.

The ratings of NFC and Navistar could be upgraded if Navistar
continues to demonstrate a positive trend in earnings improvement
and market share. Continued progress towards NAFTA negotiations
that do not result in any significant additional burden to the
company's cost position or competitiveness will help support an
upgrade. Metrics that would support an upgrade include an ability
to sustain an EBITA margin exceeding 4.5% and achieve
EBITA/interest above 2x.

The rating could be lowered if there were material reversals in any
of the key areas in which Navistar has been making progress
including: market share, warranty costs, used truck inventory. An
EBITA margin below 2.5% or an erosion in the liquidity position
could contribute to a downgrade.

The methodologies used in this rating were Captive Finance
Subsidiaries of Nonfinancial Corporations published in December
2015, Global Manufacturing Companies published in June 2017 and
Finance Companies published in December 2016.


NEIGHBORS LEGACY: Case Summary & 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Affiliated companies that filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

   Debtor                                         Case No.
   ------                                         --------
   Neighbors Legacy Holdings, Inc. (Lead Debtor)  18-33836
   10800 Richmond Avenue
   Houston, TX 77042

   EDMG, LLC                                      18-33837
   NEC Amarillo Emergency Center, LP              18-33838
   NEC Pasadena Emergency Center, LP              18-33839
   NEC Amarillo South Emergency Center, LP        18-33840
   NEC Pearland Asset Holdings, LLC               18-33841
   NEC Pearland Emergency Center, LP              18-33842
   NEC Baytown Asset Holdings, LLC                18-33843
   NEC Port Arthur Emergency Center, LP           18-33844
   NEC Baytown Emergency Center, LP               18-33845
   NEC Porter Emergency Center, LP                18-33846
   NEC Bellaire Emergency Center, LP              18-33847
   NEC San Angelo Emergency Center, LP            18-33848
   NEC Brownsville Emergency Center, LP           18-33849
   NEC Texarkana Emergency Center, LP             18-33850
   NEC College Station Emergency Center, LP       18-33851
   NEC Texas City Emergency Center, LP            18-33852
   NEC Crosby Emergency Center, LP                18-33853
   NEC Tyler Emergency Center, LP                 18-33854
   NEC West Warwick Emergency Center, LP          18-33855
   NEC Greeley Emergency Center, LP               18-33857
   NEC Harlingen Emergency Center, LP             18-33859
   NEC Wichita Falls Emergency Center, LP         18-33860
   NEC Kerrville Emergency Center, LP             18-33862
   NEC Yorktown Emergency Center, LP              18-33865
   NEC Kingwood Asset Holdings LLC                18-33866
   NEC Kingwood Emergency Center, LP              18-33867
   NEC Zaragoza Emergency Center, LP              18-33868
   Neighbors Emergency Center, LLC                18-33869
   NEC Lakeline Emergency Center, LP              18-33870
   Neighbors Global Holdings, LLC                 18-33871
   Neighbors GP, LLC                              18-33873
   NEC Longview Emergency Center, LP              18-33874
   Neighbors Health, LLC                          18-33875
   NEC Lubbock Emergency Center, LP               18-33876
   Neighbors Physician Group - Colorado, LLC      18-33877
   NEC Lufkin Emergency Center, LP                18-33878
   Neighbors Physician Group - Rhode Island, LLC  18-33879
   NEC McAllen Emergency Center, LP               18-33880
   Neighbors Physician Group, PLLC                18-33881
   Neighbors Practice Management, LLC             18-33883
   NEC Midland Emergency Center, LP               18-33884
   Next Door Urgent Care, LLC                     18-33885
   NEC Mueller Emergency Center, LP               18-33886
   NHS Emergency Centers, LLC                     18-33887
   NEC Odessa Emergency Center, LP                18-33888
   NEC Orange Emergency Center, LP                18-33889
   NEC Paris Emergency Center, LP                 18-33890
   NEC Eastside Emergency Center, LP              18-33891

Business Description: Neighbors Legacy Holdings --
                      http://www.neighborshealth.com/-- and its
                      subsidiaries currently operate 22  
                      freestanding emergency centers throughout
                      the State of Texas, including in the greater
                      Houston area, South  Texas, El Paso, the
                      Golden Triangle, the Panhandle, and the
                      Permian Basin.  The Emergency Centers are
                      designed to offer an attractive alternative
                      to traditional hospital emergency rooms by
                      reducing wait times, providing better
                      working conditions for physicians and staff,
                      and giving patient care the highest possible
                      priority.  The Debtors were founded in
                      Houston in 2008 by nine emergency room
                      physicians.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 12, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Judge: Hon. Marvin Isgur

Debtors' Counsel: John F. Higgins, Esq.
                  Eric M. English, Esq.
                  Genevieve M. Graham, Esq.
                  PORTER HEDGES LLP
                  1000 Main Street, 36th Floor
                  Houston, TX 77002
                  Tel: (713) 226-6000
                  Fax: (713) 226-6248
                  Email: jhiggins@porterhedges.com
                         eenglish@porterhedges.com
                         ggraham@porterhedges.com

Debtors'
Investment
Banker:           HOULIHAN LOKEY, INC.

Debtors'
Claims &
Noticing
Agent:            KURTZMAN CARSON CONSULTANTS, LLC
                  Website: http://www.kccllc.net/neighbors

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $0 to $50,000

The petition was signed by Chad J. Shandler, chief restructuring
officer.

A full-text copy of the Neighbors Legacy's petition is available
for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-33836.pdf

List of Debtors' 50 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
RKMS                                 Real Estate       $2,676,159
Gray Reed                               Lease
1601 Elm Street, Suite 4600
Dallas, TX 75201
Attn: Jason S. Brookner
Tel: 469-320-6132;
     214-954-4135  
Fax: 469-320-6894
Email: jbrookner@grayreed.com

BBVA Compass Financial             Equipment Lease       $893,307
Corporation
Accounts Receivable
Equipment Finance Division
PO Box 674355
Dallas, TX 75267-4355
Attn: Albert Watson
Email: albert.watson@bbva.com

Everbank Commercial Finance, Inc.  Equipment Lease       $743,722
Sylvester & Stamelman LLP
210 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor
Florham Park, NJ 07932
Attn: Anthony J. Sylveser,
      Craig L. Steinfeld
Tel: 973-302-9713;
     973-302-9697
Fax: 973-302-9463
     973-302-9946
Email: asylvester@shermanwells.com;
       csteinfeld@shermanwells.com

Spirit Realty, L.P.                   Real Estate        $568,774
Akerman, LLP                             Lease
2001 Ross Ave., Suite 3600
Dallas, TX 75201
Attn: Robert E. Weitzel
Tel: 214-720-4300
Fax: 214-971-9339
Email: robert.weitzel@akerman.com

American Express                       Trade Debt        $504,984
PO Box 650448
Dallas, TX 75265-0448
Attn: General Counsel and Jordan G.
      Coombs, CTP
Tel: 281-665-7824
Fax: 623-748-5725
Email: Jordan.G.Coombs@aexp.com

West Houston Radiology                 Trade Debt         $383,160
Associates, LLP
2126 NW Day, Suite 220
Cypress, TX 77429
Attn: Dr. Craig Thiessen
Tel: 832-754-0918
Fax: 281-781-2003;
     888-526-7633
Email: ritinvest@aol.com

Spring Gulch, LLC                     Real Estate         $367,321
Gossett, Harrison, Millican &           Lease
Stipanovic, PC
P.O. Drawer 911
San Angelo, TX 76902
Attn: Wesley M. Giesecke
Tel: 325-653-3291
Fax: 325-655-6838
Email: wesg@ghtxlaw.com

Southwest Precision Printers, LP      Trade Debt          $353,293
1055 Conrad Sauer
Houston, TX 77043
Attn: Tim Tully, CEO  
Tel: 713-777-3333
Fax: 713-777-7514
Email: ttully@swpp.com

The Don Levin Trust                   Real Estate         $286,295
Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben             Lease
Gartside LLP
2049 Century Park East,
Suite 2700
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3202
Attn: Elliot J. Siegel
Tel: 310-746-4400
Fax: 310-746-4499
Email: esiegel@elkinskalt.com

UCP Texas Management, Ltd.             Real Estate        $244,943
Email: jpearce@thefowlerlawfirm.com       Lease

T-Systems, Inc.                         Trade Debt        $219,172
Email: accountsreceivable@Tsystem.com

McKesson                                Trade Debt        $200,507
Email: Maddison.Garret@McKesson.com

GH Phipps Construction Co.              Trade Debt        $179,697
Email: floydw@hallevans.com

Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc.   Equipment Lease     $172,800
Email: dale.a.shores@wellsfargo.com

Harry Leiser, Trustee of the Harry      Real Estate       $125,540
Leiser Revocable Trust                     Lease
Email: kelly@naccaratofracassa.com

Century Square Financial Venture, LLC   Real Estate       $112,291
Email: lcollins@boyarmiller.com            Lease

Omnicell, Inc.                           Trade Debt        $94,461
Email: john.meiers@omnicell.com;
       accountsreceivable@omnicell.com

Frontier Utilities                       Trade Debt        $71,159
Email: info@frontierutilities.com

AT&T                                     Trade Debt        $69,951

Roshal Imaging Services, Inc.            Trade Debt        $64,085
Email: john@oshalimaging.com

Siemens Medical Solutions,               Trade Debt        $63,527
USA, Inc.
Email: Gary.A.Biegler@seimens-healthineers.com

Jili Janitorial Services LLC             Trade Debt        $62,297
Email: vdealva@jilijantorial.com

XtreMed Enterprise LLC                   Trade Debt        $58,952
Email: billing@x3med.com

Siemens Financial Services, Inc.         Trade Debt        $50,372
Email: customersolutions.sfs@siemens.com

Pearland Town Center Limited            Real Estate        $47,490
Partnership                                Lease
Email: amanda.mull@cblproperties.com

All Points Solutions, Inc.            Equipment Lease      $46,775
Email: clientsupport@financeservicecenter.com

National Grid                            Trade Debt        $45,126
Email: ronald.macklin@nationalgrid.com

The Lamar Companies                      Trade Debt        $41,510
Email: Khebert@lamar.com

Clear Channel Outdoor                    Trade Debt        $28,335
Email: adrianeyoungblood@clearchannel.com
       ccobilling@clearchannel.com

RDI Mechanical, Inc.                     Trade Debt        $25,399
Email: twall@rdimechanical.com;
       info@rdimechanical.com

Comcast Business                         Trade Debt        $20,894
Email: Fanny_Lambright@comcast.com

DataVox Inc.                          Equipment Lease      $20,201
Email: danaw@datavox.net

Fairway Outdoor Funding, LLC             Trade Debt        $20,009
Email: dawn.evans@fairwayoutdoor.com

GE Healthcare                         Equipment Lease      $17,695

Spry Creative Group                       Trade Debt       $16,773
Email: jking@whyspry.com

Protection One, a division                Trade Debt       $16,657
of ADT, LLC
Email: kirklove@adt.com

Frontier Communications                   Trade Debt       $16,317
Email: ColllNetINQ2@FTR.com

Inc. CEO Project                          Trade Debt       $15,010
Email: jimschleckser@IncCEOProject.com

Shannon Medical Center                    Trade Debt       $14,925
Email: DeidreSmith@shannonhealth.com

Spectrum, LLC                             Trade Debt       $14,626
Email: serena.parker@charter.com;
       DL-ICOMSBankruptcy@charter.com

Suddenlink Business                       Trade Debt       $14,232
Email: Tim.Ogrodnik@Sudenlink.com;
       Tim.Ogrodnik@AlticeUSA.com

City of Austin Utilities                  Trade Debt       $14,213
Email: myaccount@coautilities.com

ProStar Services, Inc.                    Trade Debt       $14,069
Email: Kristi.Kahrs@cscollect.com

Xcel Energy                               Trade Debt       $13,704
Email: customerservice@xcelenergy.com

Iron Mountain Storage                     Trade Debt       $12,426
Email: Christine.sabado@ironmountain.com

ALSCO, Inc. Admiral Linen and             Trade Debt       $12,323
Uniform Service, Inc.
Email: dwebster@alsco.com

Midland Rockhounds                        Trade Debt       $11,250
Email: cortiz@midlandrockhounds.org

GreatAmerica Financial Services        Equipment Lease     $11,033
Corporation
Email: MHuffman@accountservicing.com

R.G. Brinkmann Company                    Trade Debt       $10,559
Email: mladd@askbrinkmann.com;
       briansa@askbrinkmann.com

Sono Care of East Texas, LLC              Trade Debt       $10,164
Email:info@moran-lawfirm.com


OAKLAND PHYSICIANS: M. Short Bid for Reconsideration Rejected
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Maria L. Oxholm denied the Defendant's motion for
reconsideration of the Court's order granting partial summary
judgment as to Count II of Plaintiff's complaint in the case
captioned Basil T. Simon, not individually but solely in his
capacity as the Liquidation Trustee of Oakland Physicians Medical
Center, LLC, Liquidation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Michael Short,
Defendant, Adv. Proc. No. 16-05125 (Bankr. E.D. Mich.).

Count II of Trustee's adversary complaint seeks to avoid and
recover three transfers dated July 2, 15 and 17, 2015 in the amount
of $100,000 made by the debtor Oakland Physicians Medical Center
L.L.C. to the Defendant within 90 days preceding the Hospital's
bankruptcy filing. Trustee and Defendant filed cross-motions for
partial summary judgment of the preference count (Count II). The
parties argued their respective motions on March 8, 2018. The Court
granted Trustee's motion as to Count II in the amount of $100,000
and denied Defendant's motion. Defendant brings the motion pursuant
to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9024 and 7054(b).

In his motion for reconsideration, Defendant Michael Short argues
that it was an error and a palpable defect for the Court to
determine that Defendant failed to establish that there is a
genuine issue of material fact as to the second element of 11
U.S.C. section 547(c)(2) because in order for Trustee to be
entitled to summary judgment, Trustee was required to establish
that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to a necessary
element of section 547(c)(2). Defendant claims that Trustee did not
sustain his burden as to the second element of section 547(c)(2)
and the Court did not make a finding that Trustee met his burden,
further claiming that the issue was not discussed by the parties or
by the Court. In the alternative, Defendant argues that he
established the existence of a genuine issue of material fact as to
the second element of section 547(c)(2).

After reviewing the entire record, the Court finds that Defendant
failed to establish that a palpable defect has occurred by which
the Court and the parties have been misled, and that a different
disposition of the case must result from a correction of the
defect. Consequently, Defendant is not entitled to relief pursuant
to Bankruptcy Rule 9024. The Court additionally finds that
Defendant is not entitled to relief under Rule 54(b).

The bankruptcy case is in re: Oakland Physicians Medical Center,
L.L.C. d/b/a/ Doctors' Hospital of Michigan, a Michigan limited
liability company, Chapter 11, Debtor, Case No. 15-51011 (Bankr.
E.D. Mich.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 13,
2018, is available at https://bit.ly/2KSgzxx from Leagle.com.

Oakland Physicians Medical Center, LL.C., Debtor In Possession,
represented by Ryan D. Heilman , Max J. Newman -- newman@butzel.com
-- Butzel Long, Thomas B. Radom -- radom@butzel.com -- & Glenn S.
Walter -- gwalter@honigman.com

Basil T. Simon, Trustee, represented by Stephen P. Stella.

Daniel M. McDermott, U.S. Trustee, represented by Leslie K. Berg.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors & Official Unsecured
Creditors' Committee, Creditor Committees, represented by Gary A.
Hansz & Craig T. Mierzwa.


OGHI LLC: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: OGHI, LLC
           dba Glacier Ice and Snow Arena
        4601 N. Federal Highway
        Pompano Beach, FL 33064

Business Description: Glacier Ice and Snow Arena is a 40,000-
                      square foot facility, located in the heart
                      of South Florida.  The Arena is on Federal
                      Highway just North of Sample Rd. at
                      4601 N. Federal Highway, Pompano Beach, FL
                      33064.  It is equipped with a pro shop,
                      snack bar, party rooms, locker rooms, an NHL
                      sized rink, and a mini rink.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 13, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (Fort Lauderdale)

Case No.: 18-18498

Judge: Hon. Raymond B. Ray

Debtor's Counsel: Bradley S. Shraiberg, Esq.
                  SHRAIBERG, LANDAU & PAGE, PA
                  2385 NW Executive Center Dr. #300
                  Boca Raton, FL 33431
                  Tel: (561) 443-0801
                       (561) 443-0800
                  Fax: (561) 998-0047
                  Email: bss@slp.law

                    - and -
   
                  Max J. Smith, Esq.
                  SHRAIBERG, LANDAU & PAGE, PA
                  2385 NW Executive Center Dr # 300
                  Boca Raton, FL 33431
                  Tel: 561-443-0800
                  Email: msmith@slp.law

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Terry Cudmore, manager.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-18498_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-18498.pdf


ONCOBIOLOGICS INC: Regains Compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule
--------------------------------------------------------------
Oncobiologics, Inc. received on July 10, 2018, formal notice from
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC that the Company has complied with the
applicable requirements for the continued listing of the Company's
securities on The Nasdaq Capital Market, including the minimum $35
million market value of listed securities requirement.
Accordingly, the Company's previously disclosed matter before the
Nasdaq Hearings Panel has been closed.

The Company remains subject to a 180-day grace period, through Oct.
23, 2018, to regain compliance with Nasdaq's minimum $1.00 per
share bid price requirement for continued listing.  In order to
evidence compliance with that requirement, the Company must
evidence a closing bid price of at least $1.00 per share for a
minimum of ten consecutive business days on or before Oct. 23,
2018.  If the Company does not timely regain compliance, the
Company's securities would be subject to delisting; however, the
Company would be entitled to request a hearing before a Nasdaq
Hearings Panel, which request would stay any delisting action by
Nasdaq pending the ultimate conclusion of the hearing process.

                      About Oncobiologics

Oncobiologics, Inc. -- http://www.oncobiologics.com/-- is a
clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on identifying,
developing, manufacturing and commercializing complex biosimilar
therapeutics.  The Cranbury, New Jersey-based Company's current
focus is on technically challenging and commercially attractive
monoclonal antibodies, or mAbs, in the disease areas of immunology
and oncology.

Oncobiologics reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $40.02 million for the year ended Sept. 30, 2017,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$63.13 million for the year ended Sept. 30, 2016.

As of March 31, 2018, Oncobiologics had $27.78 million in total
assets, $43.05 million in total liabilities, $18.29 million in
series A convertible preferred stock, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $33.56 million.

KPMG LLP, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, issued a "going concern"
qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Sept. 30, 2017, citing that the
Company has incurred recurring losses and negative cash flows from
operations since inception and has an accumulated deficit at Sept.
30, 2017 of $186.2 million, $13.5 million of senior secured notes
due in December 2018 and $4.6 million of indebtedness that is due
on demand, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


OSBORN TAVERN: Taps Shapiro & Hender as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Osborn Tavern LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Massachusetts to hire Shapiro & Hender as its legal
counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

Jordan Shapiro, Esq., a senior partner at Shapiro & Hender and the
attorney who will be handling the case, charges an hourly fee of
$300.  Paralegals charge $75 per hour.

The firm received a retainer of $3,000, of which $1,717 was used to
pay the filing fee.

Mr. Shapiro disclosed in a court filing that he and other members
of Shapiro & Hender are "disinterested" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jordan L. Shapiro, Esq.
     Shapiro & Hender
     105 Salem Street
     Malden, MA 02148
     Phone: 781-324-5200
     Email: jslawma@aol.com

                     About Osborn Tavern LLC

Osborn Tavern LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 18-12448) on June 27,
2018.  In the petition signed by Joel Hartnett, manager, the Debtor
disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of less than $1 million.


PATRIOT NATIONAL: Court Narrows Claims in TTSL's Suit vs B&BC
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the civil action captioned TRUSTED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS,
LLC, Plaintiff, v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants,
Civil Action No. 16-7094 (JBS/JS) (D.N.J.), Plaintiff Trusted
Transportation Solutions alleges that Defendants Guarantee
Insurance Company, Patriot Underwriters, Inc., Douglas Cook, Brown
& Brown of New Jersey, LLC, and John F. Corbett misrepresented the
terms of a workers' compensation insurance policy that the
Plaintiff purchased from them.

Brown & Brown and Corbett filed a motion to dismiss Counts One
through Six and Eight through Ten of the Amended Complaint for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. District
Judge Jerome B. Simandle granted the Brown & Brown Defendants'
motion.

Counts One through Six of the Amended Complaint assert claims
against "all defendants" for: violation of the New Jersey Consumer
Fraud Act (Count One); Common Law Fraud (Count Two); Breach of
Contract (Count Three); violation of the Covenant of Good Faith and
Fair Dealing (Count Four); Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Count Five);
and Conversion (Count Six).  Counts Seven through Ten assert claims
against only Brown & Brown and Corbett individually and/or jointly
and severally for: Negligence/Broker Malpractice (Count Seven);
Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Count Eight); Breach of Special
Relationship (Count Nine); and Common Law Fraud (Count Ten).

The Brown & Brown Defendants argue that all of Plaintiff's claims
asserted against them in the Amended Complaint, except for those
alleged in Count Seven, should be dismissed for failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted.

The Brown & Brown Defendants first argue that Counts One through
Six should be dismissed against them because Plaintiff has not pled
any facts as to Brown & Brown or Corbett in any of those Counts.
Plaintiff did not respond to this argument in its opposition
papers. The Court deems Plaintiff's opposition waived and dismisses
these claims against the Brown & Brown Defendants, but not the
Insurer Defendants, with prejudice.

The Brown & Brown Defendants next argue that Count Eight should be
dismissed because, under New Jersey law, there is no separate cause
of action for "breach of fiduciary duty" against an insurance
broker; rather, such claims are incorporated into the State's
"broker negligence" cause of action. Plaintiff, in turn, cites
three New Jersey cases, which refer generally to a "fiduciary duty
of care" owed by insurance brokers to insureds, and argues "none of
these courts dismissed a claim for breach of fiduciary duty as
being redundant." The Court finds that New Jersey law does not
recognize a separate cause of action for "breach of fiduciary duty"
and dismisses Count Eight.

The Brown & Brown Defendants also argue that Count Nine should be
dismissed because Plaintiff fails to allege any facts in support of
its claim that a "special relationship" existed between the parties
beyond the typical agent-insured relationship. Plaintiff counters
that this count should not be dismissed due to pleading
deficiencies "[g]iven the minimal requirements of notice pleading,
and since the amended complaint includes adequate notice of the
claim." The Court finds that Count Nine does not adequately allege
a "special relationship" between Plaintiff and the Brown & Brown
Defendants beyond the typical broker-client relationship, and will
dismiss this Count without prejudice.

Finally, the Brown & Brown Defendants argue that Count Ten fails to
state a claim upon which relief can be granted because it does not
satisfy the heightened pleading requirements of Rule 9(b), Fed. R.
Civ. P. Specifically, the Brown & Brown Defendants argue Count Ten
"merely rehashes the same alleged misrepresentations Defendant
Douglas Cook [of Patriot] purportedly made to Trusted
Transportation at a March 2015 meeting." Plaintiff argues that the
Brown & Brown Defendants' brief "misrepresents the allegations in
the complaint," and that Count Ten satisfies Rule 9(b). The Court
finds Count Ten does not state with sufficient particularity the
circumstances constituting fraud by the Brown & Brown Defendants in
this case, as required under Rule 9(b).

For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants the Brown & Brown
Defendants' motion to dismiss. Counts One through Six and Eight is
dismissed with prejudice, while Counts Nine and Ten is dismissed
without prejudice.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated June 11,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2KJT9Lc from Leagle.com.

TRUSTED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, LLC., Plaintiff, represented by
WILLIAM J. DESANTIS -- DESANTISWBALLARDSPAHR.COM -- BALLARD SPAHR
LLP.

GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY, PATRIOT UNDERWRITERS, INC. & DOUGLAS
COOK, Defendants, represented by LARRY CLARENCE GREEN, JR. --
Green.L@wssllp.com -- WINGET SPADAFORA & SCHWARTZBERG LLP &
CHRISTINA MARIE RIEKER -- Rieker@wssllp.com -- WINGET SPADAFORA &
SCHWARTZBERG LLP.

BROWN & BROWN OF NEW JERSEY, LLC & JOHN F. CORBETT, Defendants,
represented by JEFFREY SHAWN POLLACK -- JSPollack@duanemorris.com
-- DUANE MORRIS, LLP & WILLIAM SHOTZBARGER —
Wshotbarger@duanemorris.com -- DUANE MORRIS LLP.

GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY, DOUGLAS COOK & PATRIOT UNDERWRITERS,
INC., Cross Claimants, represented by LARRY CLARENCE GREEN, JR. ,
WINGET SPADAFORA & SCHWARTZBERG LLP & CHRISTINA MARIE RIEKER,
WINGET SPADAFORA & SCHWARTZBERG LLP.
BROWN & BROWN OF NEW JERSEY, LLC & JOHN F. CORBETT, Cross
Defendants, represented by JEFFREY SHAWN POLLACK, DUANE MORRIS,
LLP.

                About Patriot National

Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based Patriot National, Inc., also known
as Old Guard Risk Services, Inc., through its subsidiaries,
provides agency, underwriting and policyholder services to its
insurance carrier clients, primarily in the workers’ compensation
sector. Patriot National -- http://www.patnat.com/-- provides
general agency services, technology outsourcing, software
solutions, specialty underwriting and policyholder services, claims
administration services and self-funded health plans to its
insurance carrier clients, employers and other clients. Patriot was
incorporated in Delaware in November 2013.

The Company completed its initial public offering in January 2015
and its common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol "PN."

Patriot National, Inc., and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-10189) on Jan. 30, 2018. In the
petitions signed by CRO James S. Feltman, the Debtors disclosed
$159.4 million in total assets and $242.2 million in total debt as
of Dec. 31, 2017.

The Debtors have tapped Laura Davis Jones, Esq., James E.
O’Neill, Esq., and Peter J. Keane, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl
& Jones LLP and Kathryn A. Coleman, Esq., Christopher Gartman,
Esq., and Jacob Gartman, Esq., at Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP as
bankruptcy counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as co-counsel
and conflicts counsel; Duff & Phelps, LLC, as financial advisor;
and Conway Mackenzie Management Services, LLC, as provider of EVP
of Finance and related advisory services. Prime Clerk LLC --
https://cases.primeclerk.com/patnat -- is the Debtors' claims,
noticing and balloting agent.

James S. Feltman of Duff & Phelps, LLC, has been tapped as chief
restructuring officer to the Debtors.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has named two creditors -- Jessica
Barad and MCMC LLC -- to serve on an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.


PREFERRED CARE: Unknown Recovery for Unsecureds Under Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P., and Kentucky
Partners Management, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Texas a Disclosure Statement explaining
their Joint Plan of Reorganization.

Under the Plan, Class 4.A (PCPMG General Unsecured Claims) will be
paid through pro rate distributions among holders.  Amount of
claims for this class is $1,777,598,535.63.  Class 4.B which is for
KPM General Unsecured Claims will be distributed as periodic pro
rata distributions among holders.  Amount of claims for this class
is $1,073,179,301.14.

The Plan provides that on the Effective Date, there will be two
Reorganized Debtors, Reorganized PCPMG and Reorganized KPM.
Definitive governance documents for the Reorganized Debtors will be
provided in Plan Supplements and executed on or before the
Effective Date. All existing Interests in the Debtors shall be
deemed cancelled without further action by the Debtors.

The Plan will establish Creditor Funds for each Reorganized Debtor
from three primary sources: (i) the Equity Settlement, (ii) the
Tennyson Settlement, and (iii) a sale of PCPMG's Management
Subsidiaries. On or before the Effective Date, each Debtor or
Reorganized Debtor will establish a Creditor Fund.

A full copy of the Disclosure Statement dated June 25, 2018 is
available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb18-4474-249.pdf

               About Preferred Care Partners

Headquartered in Plano, Texas, Preferred Care Partners Management
Group and Kentucky Partners operate skilled nursing care
facilities.

Preferred Care Partners Management Group, L.P., and affiliate
Kentucky Partners Management, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34296 and 17-34297) on
Nov. 13, 2017.  Travis Eugene Lunceford, manager of general
partner, signed the petition.  The jointly administered cases were
later transferred to the Fort Worth Division and assigned Case No.
17-44741.

Mark Edward Andrews, Esq., Jane Anne Gerber, Esq., and Aaron
Michael Kaufman, Esq., at Dykema Cox Smith, serve as the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.

Preferred Care estimated its assets at between $50,000 and
$100,000, and its liabilities at between $10,000,000 and
$50,000,000.  Kentucky Partners estimated its assets at up to
$50,000 and its liabilities at between $10,000,000 and $50,000,000.


PSD INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: PSD International LLC
        1126 West 700 North, Suite B
        Lindon, UT 84042

Business Description: PSD International LLC is a global
                      supply chain management company based in
                      Lindon, Utah.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 13, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Utah (Salt Lake City)

Case No.: 18-25173

Judge: Hon. Kevin R. Anderson

Debtor's Counsel: Michael Davidson, Esq.
                  P.O. Box 704
                  Pleasant Grove, UT 84062
                  Tel: 801-502-7773
                       801-420-4399
                  Email: davidsonlaw@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $50,000 to $100,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Aaron A. Patey, president.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/utb18-25173_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/utb18-25173.pdf


PYRGOS TAXI: Seeks Court Permission to Use BRFCU Collateral
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pyrgos Taxi, Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to use cash collateral
generated from the use of Taxi Medallions Numbers 9N35 and 9N36,
only in the ordinary course of business to preserve and protect the
Medallions.

The Debtor is the licensed owner of Pyrgos Taxi Corp., and
Medallion Numbers 9N35 and 9N36.  Prior to the Filing Date, John
Janetos -- 100% owner and sole officer of the Debtor -- as Borrower
and the Debtor as Co-signer/Co-maker and Guarantor, entered into a
secured loan agreement with Bay Ridge Federal Credit Union, whereby
BRFCU, loaned the principal amount of $820,000 to the Borrower.

As of the Filing Date, the Borrower and the Debtor are indebted to
BRFCU in the aggregate principal amount of not less than $820,000.

BRFCU contends that the payoff amount due under the Note is
approximately $771,825 as of May 9, 2018.

Based on sales data provided by the TLC, the value of the
prepetition collateral available to secure the Prepetition Debt as
of the Filing Date aggregates the approximate amount of $557,733.33
per taxicab mini-fleet corporation (two medallions). However, the
value of the Medallions has been diminishing and is continuing to
diminish due to adverse market conditions caused largely by
Internet hail ride applications upending the transportation
industry.

The Debtor's prepetition monthly payment was $4,329, which the
Debtor paid on February 1, 2018. Due to the declining market value
as well as the Debtor's advancing age, and inability to continue
driving and operating the business, the Debtor is unable to
maintain the medallions any longer.  As Janetos was unable to
negotiate a refinance of the medallions prior to the filing of this
petition, notwithstanding continued efforts to do so, the Debtor
sought relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, in order to
surrender the medallions to BRFCU and negotiate a feasible
settlement of the resulting unsecured deficiency claim.

As adequate protection to BRFCU for the diminution in value of the
Prepetition Collateral during the pendency of the automatic stay in
this case, the Debtor will comply with all rules governing the use
of cash collateral, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 361.

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 361, as adequate protection to
BRFCU, and as security for BRFCU, the Debtor will, assign and pay
to BRFCU as and when received, all net amounts received from the
operation of the Medallions, as per the budget submitted,
commencing on the Entry Date of an Order issued by the Bankruptcy
Court granting Debtor use of cash collateral.

In addition, the Debtor intends to pay directly to BRFCU cash
collateral, presently in the amount of $1,200 monthly, until such
time that BRFCU and Debtor can reach an agreement regarding the
exact deficiency balance owed and repayment arrangements are made
through Debtor's Plan of Reorganization.

Moreover, the Debtor intends to furnish each Creditor with monthly
operating reports require by the U.S. Trustee, and to provide each
Creditor with a replacement lien on the Debtor's assets to the
extent of any erosion of the Medallion's cash collateral as a
result of the Debtor's use of the earnings.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-41306-29.pdf

                      About Pyrgos Taxi Inc.

Pyrgos Taxi, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-41306) on March 9,
2018.  In the petition signed by John Janetos, its president, the
Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets and liabilities of
less than $1 million.  Judge Elizabeth S. Stong presides over the
case.  The Law Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C., is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel, and Wisdom Professional Services Inc. is its
accountant.


QUALITY CARE: Settles 2 Shareholders Class Suits
------------------------------------------------
Quality Care Properties, Inc. has reached an agreement to resolve
two purported shareholder class action lawsuits on behalf of QCP
shareholders filed in the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland.

The first action, captioned Sanderson v. Quality Care Properties,
Inc. et al., Case No. 8:18-cv-01912-TDC, names as defendants QCP
and the members of its board of directors, alleging violations of
Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 and 17 C.F.R.
Section 244,100 promulgated thereunder, and Second 20(a) of the
Exchange Act in connection with the filing of the Schedule 14A with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 21, 2018
regarding the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of April 25,
2018, by and among the Company, certain of its Subsidiaries,
Welltower Inc. and Potomac Acquisition LLC, a subsidiary of
Welltower, pursuant to which the parties agreed that, subject to
the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement,
Welltower would acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of the
Company in an all-cash merger.  The complaint filed in the
Sanderson Action alleges that the Proxy Statement omits material
information, rendering the information disclosed false and
misleading.  The Sanderson Action seeks, among other things, orders
(i) enjoining the defendants from proceeding with or consummating
the Merger, (ii) directing the defendants to account for all
damages sustained by the putative class, and (iii) awarding
plaintiff's costs and attorneys' and expert fees.

The second action, captioned Kent v. Quality Care Properties, Inc.
et al., Case No. 8:18-cv-01935-PWG, names as defendants QCP and the
members of its board of directors, alleging violations of Section
14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder,
and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act in connection with the filing
of the Proxy Statement.  The complaint filed in the Kent Action
alleges that the Proxy Statement omits material information,
rendering the information disclosed false and misleading.  The Kent
Action seeks, among other things, orders (i) enjoining the
defendants from proceeding with, consummating, or closing the
Merger, (ii) rescinding the Merger if it is consummated or,
alternatively, awarding unspecified rescissory damages, (iii)
directing the individual members of the QCP board of directors to
file an amended Proxy Statement, (iv) declaring that the defendants
violated Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as
Rule 14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and (v) awarding
plaintiff's costs and attorneys' and expert fees.

In connection with resolution of the Actions, the Company has
agreed to make amended and supplemental disclosures to the Proxy
Statement.  The Amended and Supplemental Disclosures should be read
in conjunction with the Proxy Statement, which should be read in
its entirety.  Defined terms used but not defined in the Amended
and Supplemental Disclosures have the meanings set forth in the
Proxy Statement.  Plaintiffs have agreed that, following the filing
of a Current Report on Form 8-K, they will dismiss the Actions in
their entirety, with prejudice as to the named plaintiffs only and
without prejudice to all other members of the putative class.

The resolution of the Actions will not affect the timing of the
special meeting of the QCP shareholders, which is scheduled to be
held on July 25, 2018, or the amount of the consideration to be
paid to QCP shareholders in connection with the Merger.  The
resolution of the Actions is not, and should not be construed as,
an admission of wrongdoing or liability by any defendant.
Furthermore, nothing in the Report or the resolution of the Actions
will be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality
of any of the disclosures.  Likewise, the defendants do not believe
that any further disclosure regarding the Merger is required under
applicable laws other than that which has already been provided in
the Proxy Statement.  However, to avoid the risk of the putative
shareholder class Actions delaying or adversely affecting the
Merger, to minimize the substantial expense, burden, distraction
and inconvenience of continued litigation and to resolve
plaintiffs' claims asserted in the Actions, the Company has agreed
to make these Amended and Supplemental Disclosures to the Proxy
Statement.

A full-text copy of the Supplement to Proxy Statement is available
for free at https://is.gd/6gq8ZI

                       About Quality Care

Quality Care Properties, Inc., headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland
-- http://www.qcpcorp.com/-- was formed in 2016 to hold the HCR
ManorCare portfolio, 28 other healthcare related properties, a
deferred rent obligation due from HCRMC under a master lease and an
equity method investment in HCRMC previously held by HCP, Inc.

Quality Care is a real estate company focused on post-acute/skilled
nursing and memory care/assisted living properties.  QCP's
properties are located in 29 states and include 257
post-acute/skilled nursing properties, 61 memory care/assisted
living properties, a surgical hospital and a medical office
building.

Quality Care reported a net loss and comprehensive loss of $443.5
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to net income
and comprehensive income of $81.14 million for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Quality Care had $4.38 billion in
total assets, $1.80 billion in total liabilities, $1.93 million in
redeemable preferred stock, and $2.58 billion in total equity.

                           *    *    *

S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating on Quality
Care Properties to 'CCC' from 'B-'.  "The downgrade reflects our
view that QCP has limited covenant cushion and a heightened
probability of breaching its DSC covenant as early as the first or
second quarter of 2018 absent an amendment of its credit
facilities, waiver by the lenders, or possible debt or company
reorganization," as reported by the TCR on Dec. 20, 2017.

In October 2017, Moody's Investors Service confirmed Quality Care's
ratings, including its 'Caa1' corporate family rating following
QCP's announcement that the REIT's work-out discussions with its
struggling tenant, HCR Manorcare, Inc. (HCR, unrated), are
continuing.


REDDY ICE: S&P Withdraws 'CCC+' Corporate Credit Rating
-------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings withdrew its 'CCC+' corporate credit rating on
U.S.-based Reddy Ice Holdings Inc. at the company's request as the
company is no longer required to maintain the ratings.

At the same time, S&P withdrew its 'B-' issue-level rating on the
company's senior secured revolver and term loan facilities, which
were paid off.



ROSEGARDEN HEALTH: Gets Nod on Continued Cash Collateral Use
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Ann M. Nevims of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut authorized Jon Newton, the Chapter 11
Trustee for the jointly administered estates of The Rosegarden
Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC, and Bridgeport Health Care
Center Inc., to use cash collateral.

The Debtors will use cash collateral in accordance with the Budget
with a variance of 10% permitted, and a greater variance upon the
written consent of the Alleged Secured Parties. The term for
preliminary use of cash collateral will be a period through and
including June 29, 2018.

The Trustee is allowed to use accounts receivable which constitute
cash collateral of Alleged Secured Creditors on a revolving basis
and to provide the Alleged Secured Creditors with liens upon
post-petition assets to the extent and with the same priority as
their prepetition liens and security interests as of the Filing
Date so that their interests therein will not be diminished during
the pendency of these Chapter 11 cases.  The Alleged Secured
Creditors are: (1) The Internal Revenue Service; (2) The State of
Connecticut Department of Revenue Services; (3) The State of
Connecticut Department of Labor; (4) Peoples United Bank; (5) Ram
Capital Funding LLC; (6) World Global Capital, LLC d/b/a Fastline
Capital; (7) Yellowstone Capital, LLC; and (8) B of I Federal
Bank.

In exchange for the preliminary use of cash collateral by the
Debtors, the Alleged Secured Creditors are granted replacement
and/or substitute liens as provided in Bankruptcy Code section
361(2) in all post-petition assets and proceeds thereof, excluding
all bankruptcy avoidance causes of action, having the same
validity, extent, and priority that the Alleged Secured Creditors
possessed as to said liens on the Filing Date and any rights of
setoff claimed by any of the Alleged Secured Creditors as against
the Debtors' assets prior to the Filing Date.

To the extent the adequate protection provided herein to the
Alleged Secured Creditors proves to be inadequate and such
inadequacy gives rise to a claim allowable under section 507(a)(2)
of the Bankruptcy Code, such claim will constitute an allowed
administrative expense claim against each of the Debtors on a joint
and several basis with priority over all administrative claims in
these bankruptcy cases, including all claims of the kind specified
in sections 503(b) and 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb18-30623-330.pdf

                      About The Rosegarden Health and
                         Rehabilitation Center LLC

Located in Waterbury, Connecticut, Bridgeport Health Care Center
and The Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC --
http://www.bridgeporthealthcarecenter.com/-- provide long and
short-term nursing care and rehabilitation services. Bridgeport
offers nursing care, Alzheimer’s care, rehab/physical therapy,
wound care, dietary, respite care, and hospice care.

Rosegarden services include 24-hour nursing care, APRN on Staff,
short-term/long-term rehab, physical therapy, speech therapy,
occupational therapy, IV therapy/medical/incontinence management,
CPAP/BIPAP/ tracheotomy care, podiatry; dental, audiology services,
respiratory care, among others.

Bridgeport Health Care and Rosegarden sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case Nos. 18-50488 and 18-30623, respectively) on
April 18, 2018.  In the petitions signed by their chief financial
officer, Chaim Stern, Bridgeport estimated assets and liabilities
of less than $50 million, and Rosegarden Health estimated assets
and liabilities of less than $10 million.

The Hon. Julie A. Manning is the case judge.  Richard L. Campbell,
Esq., at White and Williams LLP, serves as the Debtors' counsel.

William K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2, has
appointed Joseph J. Tomaino as patient care ombudsman in the cases.
The PCO hired Barbara H. Katz, as counsel.


ROYAL TRANSPORTATION: May Use Commerce Bank Cash Through Nov. 7
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Frank J. Bailey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts has entered an Agreed Order authorizing
Royal Transportation Services, Inc. to use cash collateral in the
ordinary course of its respective business through November 7,
2018.

As adequate protection for Royal Transportation's use of cash
collateral, and supplemental to adequate protection grants provided
in prior Orders of the Court:

     (a) Commerce Bank & Trust Company is granted a Replacement
Lien in and to all property of the kind presently securing Royal
Transportation's obligations to the Commerce Bank, but only to the
extent of the validity, perfection, priority, sufficiency and
enforceability of Commerce Bank's pre-petition security interests
and not more than any postpetition diminution of the value of the
Commerce Bank's interest in such property. Said lien will
specifically not extend to any post-petition avoidance recoveries.

     (b) Royal Transportation will make monthly adequate protection
payments to Commerce Bank in the amounts reflected on the Proposed
Budget. The payments will be made without prejudice to the parties'
rights as to the characterization of such payments as principal,
interest or costs and no allocation will be made without further
order of this Court.

     (c) Royal Transportation will continue to maintain its assets,
and will not diminish the position of Commerce Bank.

     (d) Royal Transportation will supply Commerce Bank with all of
the operating statements filed with the U.S. Trustee and such other
financial information as reasonably requested by Commerce Bank,
including proof of insurance on the taxis owned by the Debtors.

     (e) Commerce Bank has reserved any objections to Royal
Transportation's use of cash collateral beyond the period agreed as
set forth in the Agreed Order.

A continued hearing on use of cash collateral is set for November
7, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

Royal Transportation will file reconciliations to the applicable
monthly budget on or before the 15th day of the next ensuing
month.

A full-text copy of the Agreed Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-11617-111.pdf

                        About Joyfull Ride

Jointly administered debtors Joyfull Ride, Inc., June 16, Inc.,
MISH, Inc., Royal Transportation Services, Inc., and Southside
Enterprises, Inc., filed their respective Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. D. Mass. Case Nos. 17-11617, 17-11620, 17-11621, 17-11622
and 17-11623, respectively) on May 1, 2017.  The petitions were
signed by Selim Romanos, president.

At the time of filing, Joyfull Ride had $50,000 to $100,000 in
estimated assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in estimated liabilities;
Royal Transportation had less than $50,000 in estimated assets and
$100,000 to $500,000 in estimated liabilities; while June 16, Inc.,
MISH, Inc. and Southside Enterprises had $100,000 to $500,000 in
estimated assets and $500,000 to $1 million 000 in estimated
liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Frank J. Bailey.  

The Debtors are represented by John F. Sommerstein, Esq., at the
Law Offices of John F. Sommerstein.


SAM MEYERS: Final Cash Collateral Order Entered
-----------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Kentucky has
entered an Agreed Final Order granting Sam Meyers, Inc. authority
to continue to use cash collateral on a final basis.

Citizens Union Bank of Shelbyville, Inc. ("CUB") is granted a
valid, binding, enforceable and perfected first priority liens,
mortgages and security interests, superior to the liens, mortgages,
security interests or other interests or rights of all other
creditors of the Debtor's estate on property owned or leased by the
Debtor, in and upon (i) all of the Pre-Petition Collateral and all
proceeds thereof, and (ii) all of the Debtor's property and assets
acquired by the Debtor on or after the Petition Date, of any kind
or nature, whether real or personal, tangible or intangible,
wherever located, and all proceeds of any and all of the foregoing,
and all proceeds of the Collateral, to the same extent, validity
and priority as its pre-petition security interest.

As adequate protection for any post-petition diminution in value of
the CUB's interests in the Pre-Petition Collateral, including
without limitation for any diminution in value resulting from the
use of Cash Collateral, the use, sale or lease of any other
Pre-Petition Collateral, or the imposition of the automatic stay,
CUB is granted a post-petition claim against the Debtor's estate.

In order to secure the Adequate Protection Claim, CUB is granted a
lien, mortgage and security interest in and upon (a) the
Pre-Petition Collateral and all post-petition proceeds of the
Pre-Petition Collateral, and (b) the Post-Petition Collateral and
all proceeds thereof to the same extent, validity and priority as
its pre-petition security interest.

In the event that the adequate protection granted to CUB hereunder
fails to adequately protect CUB's interests in the cash collateral
and/or the Post-Petition Collateral, CUB is granted, without
further order of the Court, an administrative expense claim which
will have priority over any and all administrative expenses or
priority claims of any kind, whether arising in the Case or in any
Successor Case, other than fees payable to the U.S. Trustee and
counsel for Debtor in an amount not to exceed $25,000, such amount
excluding any retainer paid by Debtor to counsel for the Debtor.

The Debtor will (a) continue to at all times keep the collateral
fully insured against all loss, peril and hazard and make CUB
co-insured and loss payee as its interests appear under such
policies, and (b) pay any and all post-petition taxes, assessments
and governmental charges with respect to the collateral, whether or
not the Debtor is obligated to do so under the Pre-Petition Senior
Loan Documents, and will provide CUB with proof thereof upon
written demand and will give CUB access to its records in this
regard.

A full-text copy of the Agreed Final Order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/kywb18-31559-28.pdf

                        About Sam Meyers Inc.

Sam Meyers, Inc. -- http://sammeyers.com/-- is a wholesale
supplier of men's formal wear and accessories. It also owns and
operates a dry cleaning business in the Midwest. In addition to its
Louisville locations, Sam Meyers owns a store in Nashville,
Tennessee, that specializes in costume rentals and sales in
addition to formal wear; a tuxedo store in Evansville, Indiana; and
a satellite warehouse in Boston, Massachusetts. Sam Meyers' main
warehouse is located in Louisville.

Sam Meyers sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 18-31559) on May 17, 2018.  In the
petition signed by James P. Corbett, president, the Debtor
disclosed $1.8 million in assets and $2.91 million in liabilities.
Judge Alan C. Stout presides over the case. Kaplan Johnson Abate &
Bird LLP is the Debtor's counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee disclosed in a court filing that no
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Sam Meyers, Inc.


SAMARITAN COMMUNITY: Judge Signs Third Cash Collateral Order
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Deborah Thorne of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois has entered a third order granting
New Good Samaritan Community Services the right to use the cash
collateral of PSB Credit Services for the time period from June 1
to July 20, 2018.

The Debtor's continued cash collateral use will be set for status
on July 17, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

PSB Credit Services is granted replacement liens upon the property
of the Debtor's Estate and all the revenues, profits and avails
generated therefrom after commencement of this case that will have
the same validity, extent and priority as the liens held by PSB
Credit Services pre-petition. Additionally, the Debtor will pay PSB
Credit Services the amount of $1,000 on the 15th of each month as
adequate protection.

In addition, the Debtor agrees as follows:

     (a) The Debtor will provide weekly reports and pictures to PSB
Credit Services of the work being completed at the subject
property, which reports will identify how each repair relates to
and remedies a specific building code violation alleged by the City
of Chicago in its First Amended Complaint filed on May 22, 2018.
These Weekly Progress Reports will be sent by Debtor directly to
the following representative of PSB Credit Services: Joe DeGroot --
JoeD@prinsbank.com -- and Kevin Mulder --
KevinMulder@prinsbank.com;

     (b) The Debtor will provide PSB Credit Services with a list,
sworn to by Debtor, of all contractors working on the subject
property along with each contractors' contact information. The
Debtor grants PSB Credit Services permission to directly contact
the identified contractors to confirm each contractor's receipt of
payments. In addition, the Debtor will provide weekly evidence to
PSB Credit Services of Debtor's payments to the contractors and any
outstanding amounts due; and

     (c) The Debtor further agrees to increase the Adequate
Protection Payments for any future order authorizing Debtor's use
of cash collateral.

A copy of the Third Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-18184-71.pdf

           About New Good Samaritan Community Services

New Good Samaritan Community Services filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-18184) on June 15, 2017. In
the petition signed by its pastor and president, Robert Marshall,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $500,000 and debts of less
than $100,000. Karen J. Porter, Esq., at Porter Law Network, serves
as bankruptcy counsel.


SOJOURNER-DOUGLASS COLLEGE: Trustee Seeks to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------------------
Charles R. Goldstein, Chapter 11 Trustee of the estate of
Sojourner-Douglass College, Inc. and 1880 Bank, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland a Consent Motion
seeking entry of an order permitting the Trustee to use cash
collateral.

The Debtor is the fee simple owner of real property located at:

     (1) 200 N. Central Avenue, Baltimore, Maryland 21202, and

     (2) 500 N. Caroline Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Prior to the Petition Date, on September 23, 2016, the property at
200 N. Central Avenue, while left abandoned and unattended by the
Debtor, suffered significant damage from a 2-alarm fire. On or
about May 2, 2018, Seneca Specialty Insurance Company issued a
check in the amount of $209,381.80 representing final payment for
the fire loss at 200 N. Central Avenue.

1880 Bank and the Trustee agree that the Insurance Cash Collateral
are encumbered by the Deed of Trust, and are 1880 Bank's cash
collateral pursuant to the Loan Documents.

The Trustee has requested that 1880 Bank permit the use of
Insurance Cash Collateral and provide funds to be used solely for
such purposes set forth in the Budget in order to avoid immediate
and irreparable harm to the Debtor's estate, which will occur if
funds are not made available to the bankruptcy estate.

The Trustee has reached an agreement with 1880 Bank for use of the
Insurance Cash Collateral pursuant to the terms set forth in the
form of consent order.

The Trustee and 1880 Bank have agreed that, following payment of
the commission owed to the Goodman-Gable-Gould Company/Adjusters
International GGG will remit, within three business days from the
entry of the Consent Order, the balance of the Insurance Cash
Collateral as follows: (a) $125,000 of the Insurance Cash
Collateral will be remitted to the Trustee; and (b) the remaining
Insurance Cash Collateral will be remitted to 1880 Bank.

The Trustee agrees that as adequate protection for the use of cash
collateral, effective as of the Petition Date, 1880 Bank will be
granted a replacement lien upon and security interests in all of
the properties and assets of the Debtor: (i) only to the extent
1880 Bank's Cash Collateral is used by the Trustee and such use
results in a diminution of the value of its Cash Collateral; (ii)
only to the extent such pre-petition liens are valid and only to
the extent of such liens; and (iii) with the same priority in the
post-petition collateral and proceeds thereof of the Debtor that
1880 Bank held in its pre-petition collateral as of the Petition
Date.

However, the replacement liens will expressly exclude litigation
claims or other cause of action of the estate, including but not
limited to claims under Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code, and will
exclude other collateral on which it may be determined that 1880
Bank did not have a properly perfected lien as of the Petition
Date.

A full-text copy of the Consent Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb18-12191-71.pdf

Counsel to 1880 Bank:

            Patricia B. Jefferson, Esq.
            Miles & Stockbridge P.C.
            100 Light Street, 10th FL
            Baltimore, MD 21202
            Email: pjefferson@milesstockbridge.com

                   About Sojourner-Douglass College

Sojourner Douglass College was an American private college
organized around an Afrocentric focus of study.  The college was
formerly known as Homestead-Montebello Center of Antioch
University. The college was established in 1972 and is based in
Baltimore, Maryland.  The College's accreditation was revoked by
the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools effective
June 30, 2015, and the College remains closed for instruction.

Sojourner-Douglass College, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-12191) on
February 21, 2018.  In the petition signed by Charles W. Simmons,
president, the Debtor disclosed $1 million to $10 million in
estimated assets of and $10 million to $50 million estimated debts.
The Debtor is represented by Anu Kmt, Esq. at Kemet Hunt Law Group,
Inc.

The Hon. Robert A. Gordon is the case judge.


SOUTHWEST SYSTEMS: Taps Weinman & Associates as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Southwest Systems, Corp seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Colorado to hire Weinman & Associates,
P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization and will provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

Jeffrey Weinman, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
charges an hourly fee of $495.  Paralegals William Richey and Lisa
Barenberg will charge $300 per hour and $250 per hour,
respectively.

The firm received a retainer of $20,000 from Kerry Howard, the
Debtor's sole shareholder.

Mr. Weinman disclosed in a court filing that the firm and its
employees are "disinterested persons" as defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeffrey A. Weinman, Esq.
     Weinman & Associates, P.C.
     730 17th Street, Suite 240
     Denver, CO 80202-3506
     Telephone: (303) 572-1010
     Facsimile: (303) 572-1011
     Email: jweinman@weinmanpc.com

                    About Southwest Systems Corp

Southwest Systems, Corp filed its voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 7 (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-13370) on April 14,
2017.  On July 3, 2018, the Debtor voluntarily converted its case
to one under Chapter 11.


SPRUHA SHAH: Taps Leon Zelechowski as Real Estate Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Spruha Shah, LLC and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc. seek approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Illinois to hire Leon Zelechowski, Esq., as real estate counsel.

Mr. Zelechowski will represent the Debtors in the sale of a real
property located at 500 S. Hicks Road, Palatine, Illinois.  He will
be paid a flat fee of $3,000.

In a court filing, Mr. Zelechowski disclosed that he has not
represented any creditor of the Debtors.

Mr. Zelechowski maintains an office at:

     Leon Zelechowski, Esq.
     111 West Washington Street, Suite 1437
     Chicago IL 60602
     Phone: (312)609-0022 / (312)609-0626
     Email: lzelech@comcast.net

                        About Spruha Shah

Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc. -- http://www.arlingtonrental.com/
-- does business under two assumed names, as follows: (a) Arlington
Rental, which rents out party equipment and supplies, like tents,
portable dance floors, tables chairs and other catering needs, and
(b) R Lederleitner Landscape, provides landscaping services.  It
operates from a commercial property owned by Spruha Shah.

Spruha Shah, LLC, a single asset real estate as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B), is the owner of the real property commonly
known as 500 S. Hicks Rd., Palatine, Illinois.

Spruha Shah, LLC, and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case Nos. 17-18858 and 17-18861) on
June 22, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Sanjay Shah, managing
member.  The cases are jointly administered under Spruha Shah's,
with Judge Deborah L. Thorne presiding.

At the time of filing, the Debtors estimated assets and liabilities
ranging between $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtors are represented by Timothy C. Culbertson, Esq., at the
Law Offices of Timothy C. Culbertson.


SPRUHA SHAH: Taps Timothy C. Culbertson as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Spruha Shah, LLC and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc. seek approval
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Illinois to hire the Law Offices of Timothy C. Culbertson as their
legal counsel.

The firm will represent the Debtors in negotiations with their
creditors; assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan; examine
and help resolve claims against their estates; and provide other
legal services related to their Chapter 11 cases.

Timothy Culbertson, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the
cases, has agreed to represent the Debtors at a reduced rate of
$225 per hour.

Prior to the petition date, the firm received a retainer of $5,000
and a filing fee of $1,313 from each Debtor.

The firm has not represented any creditor of the Debtors, according
to court filings.

Culbertson can be reached through:

     Timothy C. Culbertson, Esq.
     Law Offices of Timothy C. Culbertson
     1107 Lincoln Ave.
     Fox River Grove, IL 60021
     Tel: (847) 913-5945
     Fax: (847) 574-8220
     Email: tcculb@yahoo.com
     Email: tcculb@gmail.com

                        About Spruha Shah

Sneh and Sahil Enterprises, Inc. -- http://www.arlingtonrental.com/
-- does business under two assumed names, as follows: (a) Arlington
Rental, which rents out party equipment and supplies, like tents,
portable dance floors, tables chairs and other catering needs, and
(b) R Lederleitner Landscape, provides landscaping services.  It
operates from a commercial property owned by Spruha Shah.

Spruha Shah, LLC, a single asset real estate as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B), is the owner of the real property commonly
known as 500 S. Hicks Rd., Palatine, Illinois.

Spruha Shah, LLC, and Sneh and Sahil Enterprises filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case Nos. 17-18858 and 17-18861) on
June 22, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Sanjay Shah, managing
member.  The cases are jointly administered under Spruha Shah's,
with Judge Deborah L. Thorne presiding.

At the time of filing, the Debtors estimated assets and liabilities
ranging between $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtors are represented by Timothy C. Culbertson, Esq., at the
Law Offices of Timothy C. Culbertson.


STRUSS FARMS: May Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Robert E. Nugent of the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Kansas has entered an order authorizing Struss
Farms LLC and Kevin W. Struss to use cash collateral on an interim
basis.

The Court finds it necessary to grant the use of cash collateral to
avoid immediate and irreparable harm to these Debtors and the
secured creditor, The Bank of Hays, who holds a security interest
in the estates of the debtors-in-possession.

The Debtors are granted authority to use the cash collateral
subject to these terms and conditions:

      (a) The Debtor shall establish trade credit for milo seed.

      (b) The Debtor will sell approximately 8,220 bushels of grain
stored at Frontier Ag. Inc., and The Bank of Hays will cooperate in
releasing the funds for Debtors' use to plant and fertilize milo
crop.

      (c) The Debtor can also sell approximately 3,200 bushels of
grain farm stored. Said grain has not been weighed and such amount
is an estimate of the actual amount. The Bank of Hays will
cooperate in releasing the funds for the Debtors' use to plant and
fertilize the milo crop.

      (d) Frontier Ag Inc. also is in possession of two checks for
2018 lease rent as follows: (1) Monty Mlinek $2,997.87; and (2)
John Schreiner $1,453.91. These leases have been cancelled by the
Estate of Monty Mlinek and by Mr. Schreiner and these funds should
be released to the debtors and will be part of the cash collateral
and The Bank of Hays will cooperate in releasing the funds for
Debtors' use as set forth.

      (e) The Bank of Hays will continue to have a security
interest in the 2018 milo crop contemplated to be planted as stated
herein. Further, Debtors are to insure the 2018 milo crop.

A final hearing on the use of cash collateral is scheduled to take
place on July 17, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. and objections to the motion
for the use of cash collateral are due on or before July 10.

If the Debtor files an amended motion for use of cash collateral
after wheat harvest, then objection date remains as July 10 and
final hearing date as July 17.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ksb18-10770-41.pdf

                      About Struss Farms LLC

Struss Farms LLC, a corn producer in Wakeeney, Kansas, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan.
Case No. 18-10770) on April 26, 2018.  In the petition signed by by
Kevin W. Struss, member/manager, the Debtor disclosed $9.57 million
in total assets and $8.78 million total debts.  The Debtor is
represented by Dan W. Forker, Jr., Esq. at Forker Suter LLC.  The
Hon. Dale L. Somers presides over the case.


SULTAN FINANCIAL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Sultan Financial Corporation
           dba Aaron's Sales and Lease
        1150 West Olympic Blvd., Suite 600   
        Los Angeles, CA 90064-1853

Business Description: Sultan Financial Corporation is a privately
                      held company engaged in the business of
                      consumer goods rental.  Since 1997, Sultan
                      Financial has been operating Aaron's Sales &
                      Lease stores in California.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 13, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Case No.: 18-18021

Judge: Hon. Ernest M. Robles

Debtor's Counsel: Jeffrey N. Brown, Esq.
                  THOMPSON COBURN LLP
                  2029 Century Park East, 19th Floor
                  Los Angeles, CA 90067
                  Tel: 310-282-9418
                  Fax: 310-282-2501
                  Email: jbrown@thompsoncoburn.com

                    - and -

                  Richard G. Reinis, Esq.
                  THOMPSON COBURN LLP
                  2029 Century Park East
                  19th Floor
                  Los Angeles, CA 90067
                  Tel: 310-282-2500
                  Email: rreinis@thompsoncoburn.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by Randall C. Sultan, CEO.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-18021.pdf

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Aaron's Inc.                       Promissory Note     $4,671,497

Attn. Robert Kamerschen
400 Galleria
Parkway SE, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30339
Robert Kamerschen
Tel: (678) 402-3000
Email: robert.kamerschen@aarons.com

Artex Risk Solutions, Inc.          Loss Experience       $80,000
                                        Charges

State Board of Equalization            Sales Tax           $65,584

Blair Ag Services, Inc.              Rent on closed        $55,000
Email: ktbillhaas@yahoo.com               Store

Diamond Mattress                        Trade Debt         $25,229
Email: l.munoz@diamondmattress.com

Yucaipa Valley Acres, LLC            Rent on Closed        $25,000
Email: tgphillips@prodigy.net             store

American Express                        Trade Debt         $15,353

Martini Iosue & Akpovi                 Professional        $13,212
Email: smartini@miacpas.com              Services

Zions Credit Corp                        Accounts          $12,423
Email: brenda.jepson@zionsbancorp.com

Littler Mendelson P.C.                Legal Services        $8,959
Email: mogden@littler.com

Ashley Furniture Industries             Trade Debt          $6,653
Email: mnelson@ashleyfurniture.com

Freeway Commercial Truck Center       Truck Repairs         $5,992
Email: john@freewayisuzutruck.com

IPFS Corporation                        Trade Debt          $5,618
Email: john.lester@ipfs.com

Granite Telecommunications              Trade Debt          $4,642

Staples Businses Advantage              Trade Debt          $3,397
Email: danabernard@staples.com

American Arbitration Association        Arbitration         $1,500
         
                                      never occurred

Abilita                                 Trade Debt          $1,450
Email: nshaker@abilita.com

TALX Corporation                        Trade Debt          $1,142

Fresno Grizzlies                                            $1,100

Newark Element                          Trade Debt            $917


SUNCREST STONE: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Affiliated companies that have filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

   Debtor                                      Case No.
   ------                                      --------
   Suncrest Stone Products, LLC (Lead Case)    18-10850
   341 County Farm Road
   Ashburn, GA 31714

   341 Stone Properties, LLC                   18-10851
   341 County Farm Road
   Ashburn, GA 31714

Business Description: Suncrest Stone --
                      https://www.suncreststone.com -- is a stone
                      supplier in Ashburn, Georgia.  Its products
                      include Ashlar, Country Ledge, Ledge, River
                      Rock, Olde-Castle, Splitface, Stock, and
                      Rubble.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: July 13, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of Georgia (Albany)

Judge: Hon. Austin E. Carter

Debtors' Counsel: David L. Bury, Jr., Esq.
                  STONE & BAXTER, LLP
                  577 Mulberry Street, Suite 800
                  Macon, GA 31201
                  Tel: 478-750-9898
                  Fax: 478-750-9899
                  Email: dbury@stoneandbaxter.com

                    - and -

                  Matthew S. Cathey, Esq.
                  STONE & BAXTER, LLP
                  577 Mulberry Street, Suite 800
                  Macon, GA 31201
                  Tel: 478-750-9898
                  Fax: 478-750-9899
                  Email: mcathey@stoneandbaxter.com

                                      Estimated    Estimated
                                       Assets     Liabilities
                                    ------------  -----------
Suncrest Stone Products, LLC        $500K to $1M  $1M to $10M
341 Stone Properties, LLC           $1M to $10M   $1M to $10M

The petition was signed by Max Suter, authorized officer.

A full-text copy of Suncrest Stone's petition containing, among
other items, a list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors
is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb18-10850.pdf

A full-text copy of 341 Stone's petition containing, among other
items, a list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/gamb18-10851.pdf


TERRANOVA LANDSCAPES: Gets Approval of Plan to Exit Bankruptcy
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
approved the plan proposed by Terranova Landscapes, Inc. to exit
Chapter 11 protection.

The court gave the thumbs-up to the plan of reorganization after
finding that it satisfied the requirements for confirmation under
section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.

In the same filing, the court also gave final approval to the
disclosure statement, which explains the plan.

               About Terranova Landscapes Inc.

Terranova Landscapes, Inc. dba Terranova Fine Landscapes, based in
Center Moriches, New York, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-70472) on January
27, 2017.  The petition was signed by Eric Searles, president.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $827,529 in assets
and $2.07 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Louis A. Scarcella.  The Debtor is
represented by Gary C. Fischoff, Esq., at Berger, Fischoff, &
Shumer, LLP.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Terranova Landscapes, Inc., as
of March 3, according to a court docket.


THX PROPERTIES: Taps Sussman & Moore as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
THX Properties, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Texas to hire Sussman & Moore, LLP as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm charges these hourly fees:

     Weldon Moore, III     $375
     Ronald Sussman        $475
     Paralegal             $100

Weldon Moore, III, Esq., at Sussman & Moore, disclosed in a court
filing that the firm does not represent any interest adverse to the
Debtor.

The firm can be reached through:

     Weldon L. Moore, III, Esq.
     Sussman & Moore, LLP
     4645 N. Central Expressway, Suite 300
     Dallas, TX 75205
     Telephone: (214) 378-8270
     Email: wmoore@csmlaw.net
     Fax: (214) 378-8290

                     About THX Properties LLC

THX Properties, LLC is a real estate company that owns in fee
simple 86 Townhome lots, common areas as well as architectural
plans relating to a real estate project located at Solana Circle,
Denton, Texas.  The properties are valued at $3.2 million based on
recent offer to purchase.

THX Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 18-41409) on June 29, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Jason Helal, its manager, the Debtor disclosed
$3.28 million in assets and $3.71 million in liabilities.

Judge Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the case.


TORIKADE INC: Taps Brundage Law as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Torikade, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Florida to hire Brundage Law, P.A. as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation and implementation of a
bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

Michael Brundage, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
will charge an hourly fee of $375.  The rate for paralegal services
is $110 per hour.

The Debtor paid the firm the sum of $2,500 for pre-bankruptcy
services and a retainer of $17,500.

All members of the firm are "disinterested persons" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court
filings.

Brundage Law can be reached through:

     Michael P. Brundage
     Brundage Law, P.A.
     100 Main Street, Suite 204
     Safety Harbor, FL 34695
     Telephone: (727) 250-2488
     Mobile: (813) 505-6868
     Email: mpbrundagelaw@gmail.com

                       About Torikade Inc.

Torikade, Inc. operates child care centers in Seffner and Valrico,
Florida.  Torikade sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-05149) on June 21,
2018.  In the petition signed by Deborah Mast, its member, the
Debtor disclosed $743,882 in assets and $1.54 million in
liabilities.


TOTAL PERFECTION: Taps Brian McCaffrey as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Total Perfection Construction Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire Brian
McCaffrey Attorney at Law, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Partners             $400
     Associates           $200
     Legal Assistants     $100

McCaffrey received a retainer in the sum of $15,000 from the
Debtor.

Brian McCaffrey, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that his firm is
a "disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Brian McCaffrey, Esq.
     Brian McCaffrey Attorney at Law, P.C.
     88-18 Sutphin Blvd., 1st Floor
     Jamaica, NY 11435
     Phone: 718-480-8280
     Email: info@mynylawfirm.com

              About Total Perfection Construction Inc.

Total Perfection Construction Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-43680) on
June 26, 2018.  In the petition signed by Manuj Prasad, president,
the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than
$100,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.


TOTAL PERFECTION: Taps Nexus Accounting as Bookkeeper
-----------------------------------------------------
Total Perfection Construction Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire a
bookkeeper.

The Debtor proposes to employ Nexus Accounting Services Inc. to
complete its tax returns and financial reports, and provide monthly
bookkeeping services.

Asim Raja, principal of Nexus and the professional who will be
providing the services, will charge an hourly fee of $200.

Nexus is a "disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

              About Total Perfection Construction Inc.

Total Perfection Construction Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-43680) on
June 26, 2018.  In the petition signed by Manuj Prasad, its
president, the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of
less than $100,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.


TPG PACE: S&P Assigns 'B+' Corporate Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B+' corporate credit rating to Ft.
Worth, Texas-based TPG Pace Energy Holdings Corp. (TPGE, to be
renamed Magnolia Oil & Gas Corp. upon closing of the proposed
acquisition).
  
S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'BB-' issue-level
rating to TPGE's proposed $400 million senior unsecured notes due
2026. The recovery rating on the notes is '2', indicating our
expectation of substantial (70% to 90%; rounded estimate: 85%)
recovery to creditors in the event of a payment default.  

"Our rating on TPGE reflects the company's participation in the
cyclical and capital-intensive oil and gas exploration and
production (E&P) industry, its relatively small proved developed
reserve base, modest production level, lack of geographic
diversity, and lack of operating track record with these assets.
These factors are offset by the company's concentration in an
oil-weighted basin and above-average profitability, currently very
low leverage, and substantial expected free operating cash flow
generation. Based on our current price deck assumptions, we
estimate funds from operations (FFO) to debt to remain in excess of
100% and free operating cash flow (FOCF) to debt above 50% over the
next two years.  

"The outlook is stable, reflecting our view that TPGE will maintain
FFO/debt in excess of 100% and generate meaningful positive free
operating cash flow while successfully increasing production and
reserves on the acquired assets. Our expectations for double-digit
production growth and above-average profitability are offset by the
company's lack of track record on the assets.  

"We could lower the rating if we expected FFO/debt to fall and
remain below 60% or free operating cash flow to fall and remain
below 25% for a sustained period, or if liquidity weakened. This
would most likely occur if commodity prices were to weaken below
our price deck assumptions, if the company did not meet our oil
production growth expectations, or due to a leveraging
transaction."  

An upgrade would be possible if the company improved the scale of
its proved developed reserves and production to levels more
consistent with 'BB-' rated peers, while maintaining FFO/debt above
45%, FOCF/debt above 15%, and adequate liquidity.


TRIPOLIS TAXI: Wants to Use Cash Generated from Taxi Medallions
---------------------------------------------------------------
Tripolis Taxi Corp. seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to use of cash
collateral generated from the use of Taxi Medallions Numbers 9N35
and 9N36, only in the ordinary course of business to preserve and
protect the Medallions.

The Debtor is the licensed owner of Tripolis Taxi Corp. and
Medallion Numbers 4J40 and 4J41.

Prior to the Filing Date, George J. Janetos and John Janetos --
100% owner and sole officers of the Debtor -- as Borrower and the
Debtor as Co-signer/Co-maker and Guarantor, entered into a secured
loan agreement with Bay Ridge Federal Credit Union, whereby BRFCU,
loaned the principal amount of $820,000 to the Borrower.

As of the Filing Date, Borrower and the Debtor are indebted to
BRFCU in the aggregate principal amount of not less than $820,000.
BRFCU contends that the payoff amount due under the Note is
approximately $744,027 as of May 9, 2018.

Based on sales data provided by the TLC, the value of the
prepetition collateral available to secure the Prepetition Debt as
of the Filing Date aggregates the approximate amount of $557,733.33
per taxicab mini-fleet corporation (two medallions).  However, the
value of the Medallions has been diminishing and is continuing to
diminish due to adverse market conditions caused largely by
Internet hail ride applications upending the transportation
industry.

The Debtor intends to pay directly to BRFCU cash collateral,
presently in the amount of $1,200 monthly, until such time that
BRFCU and Debtor can reach an agreement regarding the exact
deficiency balance owed and repayment arrangements are made through
Debtor's Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor's prepetition monthly payment was in the amount of
$4,329, which Debtor last paid on February 1, 2018. Due to the
declining market value as well as Debtor's advancing age, and
inability to continue driving and operating the business, the
Debtor is unable to maintain the medallions any longer. As he was
unable to negotiate a refinance of the medallions prior to the
filing of this petition, notwithstanding continued efforts to do
so, the Debtor sought relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code, in order to surrender the medallions to BRFCU and negotiate a
feasible settlement of the resulting unsecured deficiency claim.

As adequate protection to BRFCU for the diminution in value of the
Prepetition Collateral during the pendency of the automatic stay in
this case, the Debtor will comply with all rules governing the use
of cash collateral, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 361.

Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 361, as adequate protection to
BRFCU, and as security for BRFCU, the Debtor will, assign and pay
to BRFCU as and when received, all net amounts received from the
operation of the Medallions, as per the budget submitted,
commencing on the Entry Date of an Order issued by the Bankruptcy
Court granting Debtor use of cash collateral.

In addition, the Debtor intends to pay directly to BRFCU cash
collateral, presently in the amount of $1,200 monthly, until such
time that BRFCU and Debtor can reach an agreement regarding the
exact deficiency balance owed and repayment arrangements are made
through Debtor's Plan of Reorganization.

The Debtor also intends to furnish each Creditor with monthly
operating reports require by the U.S. Trustee, and to provide each
Creditor with a replacement lien on the Debtor's assets to the
extent of any erosion of the Medallion's cash collateral as a
result of the Debtor's use of the earnings.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-41344-31.pdf

                     About Tripolis Taxi Corp.

Tripolis Taxi Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-41344) on March 12,
2018. In the petition signed by John Janetos, its president, the
Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets and liabilities of
less than $1 million. Judge Nancy Hershey Lord presides over the
case.  The Law Offices of Alla Kachan, P.C. is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel; and Wisdom Professional Services Inc. is its
accountant.


TROLL ROAD II: Fitch Affirms BB- Rating on 1999/2005 Revenue Bonds
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'BB+' rating for Toll Road Investors
Partnership II (TRIP II, the partnership) Dulles Greenway project's
approximately $1 billion in outstanding revenue bonds series 1999
and 2005. The Rating Outlook has been revised to Negative from
Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The Negative Outlook reflects weakened traffic and revenue
performance in recent periods primarily due to recent improvements
along competing alternative routes in the region, which has eroded
existing volume and resulted in fiscal 2017 and forecasted coverage
levels to fall below Fitch's previously developed rating case
expectations. The Negative Outlook is also driven by limited
visibility into future rate-setting, as the current tolling
authorization expires in 2020 and future toll increases thereafter
have not yet been authorized by regulators. To the extent a healthy
recovery does not materialize or an adequate mechanism is not
implemented for fiscal 2021 and beyond, coverage levels may remain
pressured at or below 1.20x over the medium term and result in a
lower rating.

The 'BB+' rating reflects Dulles Greenway's predominantly commuter
traffic base in the strong metropolitan DC area, which is
susceptible to volatility due to nearby non-tolled alternate
routes. The rating also reflects TRIP II's limited rate-making
predictability, as there are currently no firm plans following
expiration of the current rate schedule in 2020, which provides for
annual, above-inflationary increases per the Virginia Highway
Corporation Act, subject to annual implementation by the Virginia
Corporation Commission (SCC). Under Fitch rating case assumptions,
TRIP II's projected financial profile would need to implement
annual toll increases of 2% or higher in order to maintain debt
service coverage ratios (DSCR) of at least 1.0x (including required
capital deposits).

Healthy Service Area with Competition - Revenue Risk (Volume):
Midrange

Dulles Greenway benefits from a primarily commuter traffic base
with minimal exposure to commercial traffic within the economically
strong and growing metropolitan area outside Washington DC.
However, the road has experienced a sizable amount of traffic
volatility, with a peak-to-trough decline of roughly 24%, as a
result of the Great Recession, some elasticity to toll rate
increase, and several nearby non-tolled alternative routes. The
Greenway's toll rates are higher than most peers at around $0.40
peak per mile, though comparable to privately-owned peers within
similar, healthy service areas.

Short-Term Rate-Making Predictability - Revenue Risk (Price):
Midrange

TRIP II's short-term financial position is somewhat stabilized by
current rate-setting legislation, which provides for annual,
above-inflationary toll increases through 2020 (subject to
legislative implementation). TRIP II's history of raising rates
above inflation despite political issues is viewed positively.
However, rate-making authorization beyond 2020 is uncertain, and
revenue generation could be constrained in the event an adequate
tolling arrangement is not obtained. A rate authorization with
limiting terms for timely or adequate rate adjustments would
warrant a downward price risk assessment to weaker.

Manageable Capital Plan - Infrastructure Development and Renewal:
Midrange

Dulles Greenway's capital plan is manageable, at around $46 million
over the next 10 years, funded with annual cash surpluses, with the
majority of the CIP allocated to roadway maintenance. TRIP II's
ability to raise tolls to recover capital expenses is constrained
due to the current rate framework, though presently mitigated as
the greenway is still a relatively young asset with minimal
commercial traffic exposure and no major capacity constraints.
However, capital needs will likely increase as the asset ages and
the partnership's long-term ability to fund such needs is currently
uncertain.

Back-loaded, Flexible Structure - Debt Structure: Midrange
TRIP II's debt structure features fixed-rate, senior debt with most
series as capital appreciation bonds. TRIP II's mandatory early
redemption feature is viewed positively as it causes the
partnership's debt service profile to gradually escalate at an
annual average rate of 0.76% rather than facing a balloon principal
payment. Missing an early redemption payment is not an event of
default, though deferral of planned early redemptions could cause
debt obligations to balloon. However, this risk is partially
mitigated by the requirement to annually trap excess revenue when
the 1.25x DSCR (including early mandatory redemptions) covenant is
breached.

Financial Profile

TRIP II's financial profile under Fitch's rating case is
characterized by narrow DSCRs (10-year average of 1.2x through
2027) and high current leverage (net debt to cash flow available
for debt service of 13.0x at fiscal year-end 2022). Weak financial
metrics have resulted in recent rate covenant violations, which are
expected to persist in Fitch's rating case, and are inconsistent
with an investment-grade financial profile. Unrestricted cash and
O&M reserve balances of around $7.4 million (or 196 days cash on
hand) and significant additional cash balances held in lock-up
somewhat mitigate TRIP II's weaker financial metrics.

PEER GROUP

Dulles Greenway's peers include similar commuter-based facilities
such as North Carolina Turnpike Authority's Triangle Expressway
System (Triangle Expressway; BBB-/Positive Outlook) and Foothills
Eastern Transportation Corridor (F/ETCA; BBB-/BB+/Outlook Stable).
Triangle Expressway and F/ETCA's investment-grade senior-lien
ratings benefit from stronger legal rate-setting flexibility
without material limitations, and also reflect stronger average
DSCR levels under Fitch's rating case of 1.4x or better. F/ETCA's
subordinate-lien DSCR is around 1.3x, which is more comparable to
TRIP II's average DSCR of 1.2x and in line with the 'BB' category.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

  -- Failure to obtain legislative approval for adequate toll
increases in 2021 and beyond;

  -- Continued traffic declines leading to underperformance of
Fitch's rating case DSCR targets of 1.2x for a prolonged period.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

  -- Improvement in traffic performance leading to outperformance
of Fitch's base case DSCR targets of 1.4x on a sustained basis.

CREDIT UPDATE

Performance Update

Traffic and revenue performance in fiscal 2017 (year ending
December 31) was below Fitch's expectations, primarily as a result
of network changes in the corridor leading to higher traffic on
competing alternative routes. This includes removal of traffic
signals and roadway widening, and significantly the extension of
the Gloucester Parkway as a new facility along a parallel route
north of the Greenway. Traffic declined by 1.6% in FY 2017,
compared to Fitch's expectation of modest 0.6% growth. Toll revenue
grew by 1.3% in FY 2017, due to a toll increase of around 3%
implemented in March 2017. This led to a debt service coverage
ratio of 1.18x, below the 1.25x annual covenant, resulting in
distributable funds remaining in lock-up. The partnership has
failed to achieve DSCR above 1.25x in every year since 2011.

Year-to-date performance for the five months through May 2018 shows
a 5.3% decline in traffic and 2.9% decline in revenue compared to
the prior period, resulting from another 3% toll rate increase in
March 2018. Management indicates that the steep year-to-date
declines are related to continued ramp-up along Gloucester Parkway
and construction along the Greenway related to the Silver Line
expansion. In Fitch's opinion, construction on alternative routes
that was completed in 2016-17 had also bolstered traffic
performance in prior periods. Operating expenses are currently
tracking 3.3% above the prior year period, in line with expected
growth under the previous Fitch rating case. Fitch estimates DSCR
for FY 2018 at 1.16x, lower than the previous Fitch rating case
DSCR of 1.26x.

The Greenway benefits from its location in Loudoun County (IDR
AAA/Stable), a rapidly growing area west of Washington, D.C. The
county's population has increased by an average annual rate of
3.5%, among the fastest growing in the U.S., spurred by job
creation among federal contractors and tech companies. The county
has plans for additional transportation network improvements to
accommodate future growth, which could negatively impact Greenway
traffic in the coming years.

Fitch continues to view future completion of Phase II of the Silver
Line (the new segment of Washington DC's Metrorail) as a present
but minimal risk to TRIP II's traffic base. The new Metrorail line
is not expected to draw a material amount of traffic from the
Greenway given comparable expected fares and limited overlap of the
Greenway and the Silver Line primarily at the eastern end, making
transfer from the Greenway to the Metrorail somewhat inconvenient
for drivers considering the likely flow of traffic. However, there
will be park-and-ride stations set up at certain exits off the
Greenway, and overall expansion of the Metrorail is considered an
important component of the regional transportation network.

In January 2018, TRIP II executed a tenth supplemental indenture,
which allows a portion of cash held in lock-up in the early
redemption reserve fund to be applied to capital project costs to
reduce congestion at the connection between the Greenway and the
Dulles Toll Road (DTR) in the eastbound direction. The project will
add an additional lane in the Greenway's eastbound direction of the
mainline toll plaza toward DTR. The Greenway received approval to
use $17.5 million of funds held in lock-up towards the DTR
Connector expansion project. The project is expected to be
completed in 2019. Some short-term disruptions are expected while
construction is underway. Other capital needs remain manageable and
are expected to be met through improvement fund cash-flows.

Fitch Cases

Fitch's base and rating cases both assume a 4% traffic decline and
overall decline in EBITDA of -2.5% for FY 2018, which reflects a
moderate degree of improvement over current performance. The base
case assumes gradual erosion of traffic growth from 2019 through
debt maturity in 2056, stepping down from 1% to 0%, reflecting a
maturing system. Fitch's rating case assumes a similar rate of
erosion over time, with half the growth rates used in the base
case. Both Fitch's base and rating case assume that TRIP II is able
to implement toll increases at an annual rate of 2% after 2020.
Average tolls through 2020 are assumed to increase by 3% in the
base case and 2.5% in the rating case. Operating expenses grow 2.8%
in the base case and at a slightly more stressful 3.3% in the
rating case.

Fitch's base case yields a 10-year average indenture DSCR of 1.26x,
minimum LLCR of 1.42x, and leverage in 2022 of 12.2x. Fitch's
rating case metrics are slightly weaker, with a 10-year average
indenture DSCR of 1.19x, minimum LLCR of 1.26x, and leverage in
2022 of 13.0x. Rating case metrics are commensurate with a
speculative grade 'BB+' rating per Fitch's toll road criteria
guidance for standalone facilities. Fitch's additional sensitivity
analyses indicate annual toll increases below 2% would likely
result in certain years of DSCR below 1.0x (including capex
deposits) and a more strained financial profile, which is
inconsistent with the current rating level. Nonetheless, Fitch
recognizes the protections to bondholders through the legal
structure, including distribution lock-ups and the prepayment
schedule.

Fitch acknowledges that prepayments from the early redemption
reserve fund will reduce actual debt service by approximately $63.5
million from FY 2018 through FY 2021. While Fitch's projected DSCRs
as quoted are calculated in line with the issuer's covenant tests,
and as such do not give credit for prepayments, Fitch acknowledges
that actual cash-basis debt service coverage will be improved in
2018-2021 (exceeding 2.0x in certain years). However, debt service
escalates in 2022 to $68.5 million, and grows by around 1.4%
through the 2027 forecast window. The escalation in debt service
costs shortly following expiration of the current tolling regime,
coupled with recent weaker traffic performance influencing future
growth potential, is a key factor influencing the Negative
Outlook.

Going forward, Fitch will closely monitor the impact of competing
alternatives on TRIP II's traffic performance, including the
expected opening of the Silver Line in 2020 and the local
alternative route improvements implemented in 2016 and 2017. A
return to stable traffic performance, coupled with swift completion
of the DTR widening project and legal approval of a long-term
tolling arrangement consistent with the current framework, could
lead to performance in line with Fitch's base case, which over time
could be commensurate with an investment grade rating.

Asset Description

TRIP II is the special purpose company that owns the Dulles
Greenway. The Dulles Greenway is a six-lane, 14-mile, limited
access toll highway in Loudoun County, Virginia, a suburb of
Washington, DC, connecting Dulles International Airport with US-15
in Leesburg. It serves as an extension of the state-owned Dulles
Toll Road, which connects Dulles Airport and other high-density
employment centers in the corridor to the rest of the Washington
metropolitan area. The two toll roads connect at a toll plaza,
where drivers pay a single toll that is allocated to the two
operators.

Security

The senior bondholders have a first priority lien on the security
interest within the Trust Estate, which includes all of the rights
to net revenue, real estate interest, rights under the easements
and rights, title and interest in the equipment.


TWO STREETS: May Continue Using Cash Collateral Thru Nov. 10
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Edward Ellington of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi authorized Two Streets, Inc., to
use cash collateral in accordance with a budget for a period from
the petition date through and including the earliest to occur of:

      A. November 10, 2018.

      B. The payment in full of the Claim, including all
         postpetition amounts permitted by Section 506(b) of the
         Bankruptcy Code based on the combined values of the Real
         Property Collateral, the Personal Property Collateral
         and the Guarantor Collateral;

      C. The occurrence of any of these Termination Event:

              (i) the Debtor fails to fully and timely comply
                  with any of the provisions of this Agreed
                  Order;

             (ii) the Debtor fails to file any monthly operating
                  report within 14 days of its due date;

            (iii) the Debtor fails to file a plan by September
                  26, 2018;

             (iv) any plan timely filed by the Debtor is not
                  confirmed within 45 days of filing;

              (v) the entry of an order dismissing this case;

             (vi) the entry of an order converting this case to
                  Chapter 7; or

            (vii) the entry of an order in this case appointing
                  a Chapter 11 trustee, chief responsible
                  officer, or examiner with powers over the
                  operation and business of the Debtor.

The Debtor is indebted to BancorpSouth Bank on a loan evidenced by
a promissory note.  The unpaid balance as of the petition date is
$508,445.85, with interest accruing at $78.85 daily. Payment of the
BancorpSouth Claim is secured by duly perfected first mortgage
liens against and security interests in substantially all of the
Debtor's property.

BancorpSouth is granted, nunc pro tunc as of the petition date,
valid, binding, enforceable and automatically perfected
first-priority replacement security interests in and liens upon and
against all of the Debtor's postpetition accounts, accounts
receivable, deposit accounts and contract rights and all other
personal property acquired postpetition which is of the same type
or character as the Personal Property Collateral and all proceeds
thereof.

The Adequate Protection Liens will be subject only to valid,
perfected, enforceable and unavoidable liens and security interests
superior in priority to BancorpSouth's prepetition security
interests and liens, if any, and only to the extent such
prepetition liens are valid and not otherwise subject to avoidance
or subordination.

In addition, the Debtor will:

     (a) Pay to BancorpSouth on or before first day of each
         month, beginning July 1, 2018 and continuing thereafter
         on the same day of each month thereafter until otherwise
         ordered by the Court, the monthly amount of $2,365.50;

     (b) Provide to BancorpSouth within 10 days following the end
         of each month -- by email to lalvis@rccalaw.com – a
         written reconciliation report for the previous month's
         Budget, showing for each line item the amount forecast
         under the Budget and the actual amount received or
         expended for such month.

     (c) Keep in force insurance of all of the Collateral in
         accordance with the requirements of the prepetition loan
         documents governing the Claim;

     (d) Pay as and when due all taxes on the Collateral; and

     (e) Provide BancorpSouth with proof of Debtor's compliance
         with subsections (c) and (d) from time to time as
         reasonably requested by BancorpSouth.

To the extent that the liens and security interests granted are
inadequate to provide adequate protection to BancorpSouth, the
Claim will be entitled to administrative priority pursuant to
Section 507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, with priority over any and
all claims against the Debtor of any kind whatsoever. The
Superpriority Claims will have priority over any other claims for
administrative expenses of the kind specified in Sections 503(b) or
507(b) of the Bankruptcy Code excluding the Carve Out Expenses.

A full-text copy of the Agreed Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mssb18-02103-44.pdf

                       About Two Streets

Two Streets, Inc., doing business as All-Metro Fence Company --
http://www.allmetrofence.com/-- is a family owned and operated
company located in Jackson, Mississippi, that builds every type of
fence, including: chain link, custom wood, remote controlled
entrances, PVC, aluminum, and wrought iron for residential,
commercial, and industrial customers.

Two Streets, Inc., sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D. Miss. Case No. 18-02103) on May 29, 2018. In the petition
signed by Danny Wayne Street, president, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $1 million and debt of less than $10 million.
The Hon. Edward Ellington presides over the case. R. Michael Bolen,
Esq., of Hood & Bolen, PLLC, serves as counsel to the Debtor.


U & J REALTY: Seeks Authority to Use Cash Collateral
----------------------------------------------------
U & J Realty, LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to use cash, accounts receivable
and other income derived from its operations to fund its operating
expenses and costs of administration in this Chapter 11 case for
the duration of the chapter 11 case.

The Debtor believes these creditors may claim blanket liens against
its assets:

     (a) Seacoast Bank, which asserts a claim of approximately
$51,226;

     (b) Navitas Credit Corp., asserting a total claim of
approximately $82,551;

     (c) Synovus Bank, which asserts a claim of approximately
$43,618;

     (d) CHTD Company, which asserts a claim of approximately
$44,315; and

     (e) Corporation Service Company, which claim is still
unknown.

Since any cash collateral generated by the Debtor may constitute
the cash collateral of the Secured Creditors, the Debtor offers the
Secured Creditors the following As adequate protection for the use
of cash collateral:

     (a) Post-petition replacement liens to the same extent,
validity and priority as existed pre-petition;

     (b) The right to inspect the Secured Creditors' collateral on
forty-eight hours' notice; and

     (c) Copies of monthly financial documents generated in the
ordinary course of business and other information as the Secured
Creditors reasonably request with respect to the Debtor's
operations.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb18-04940-10.pdf

                       About U & J Realty

U & J Realty, LLC, owns in fee simple commercial buildings and
adjacent vacant lot used for parking located in Tampa, Florida.
The company valued at Properties at $1.6 million. U & J Realty
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-04591) on
June 1, 2018. In the petition signed by Ujwal J. Patel, manager,
the Debtor disclosed $1.60 million in total assets and $1.86
million in total liabilities. Buddy D. Ford, Esq., at Buddy D.
Ford, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel; and Levin Investment Realty
Corp., as real estate broker to the Debtor.


VICTORY ENTERTAINMENT: Taps George J. Paukert as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Victory Entertainment Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California to hire the Law
Offices of George J. Paukert as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the administration of the estate's
assets and liabilities; prepare a plan of reorganization; and
provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

George Paukert, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
charges an hourly fee of $200.  His firm received $10,000 from the
Debtor prior to the petition date.

Mr. Paukert disclosed in a court filing that he and his firm are
"disinterested persons" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     George J. Paukert, Esq.
     Law Offices of George J. Paukert
     44376 Hazel Canyon Lane
     Palm Desert, CA, CA 92260
     Tel: 310-850-0231
     Fax: 442-282-8319
     Email: paukburt@aol.com

                 About Victory Entertainment Inc.

Victory Entertainment Inc., which conducts business under the name
VIP Showgirls, is an adult entertainment club in North Hollywood,
California.

Victory Entertainment sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Calif. Case No. 18-11342) on May 25,
2018.  In the petition signed by Arshavir Khachikian, its
president, the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of
less than $500,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Victoria S. Kaufman presides over the case.


WALL STREET THEATER: Wants to Use Cash to Purchase Lighting Hoists
------------------------------------------------------------------
Wall Street Theater Company, Inc. and its affiliates request the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut to:

     (1) approve a Compromise Settlement between Debtors and
Supertech, Inc., with respect to the Amended Motion for Turnover of
Property, and

     (2) use cash collateral on a supplemental basis to enable
Debtors to effectuate the settlement with Supertech.

WSTC needs funding to purchase lighting hoists.

Supertech has filed a secured claim in the Debtors' bankruptcy
cases for $397,129.03 on account of goods and services rendered.
WSTC retained Supertech to provide certain goods and services as
part of the construction of its theater property located at 71 Wall
Street, Norwalk, Connecticut.  Supertech was to supply and install
hoists that hold the theater lighting in place.

Patriot Bank, N.A. has consented to the use of cash collateral for
the purpose of purchasing the lighting hoists. The cost of the
hoists is $16,340.

Without lighting hoists, WSTC said it cannot put on performances or
operate.

Among the terms of the Settlement are:

     (a) On or about July 2, 2018, United Rigging & Staging will
remove the Supertech-owned hoists and install the hoists (New
Equipment), as well as all related equipment, and immediately turn
over Supertech's hoists to Supertech.

     (b) During the installation of the New Equipment, Supertech
employee Todd Paskin will be present at the theater property.

     (c) On or before July 2, 2018, WSTC will pay to Supertech the
sum of $16,340. The Settlement Payment will be delivered in escrow
to Escrow Agent, Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C. c/o Nancy Kinsella,
Esq., and Escrow Agent will hold the Settlement Payment in escrow
and not release the Settlement Payment to Supertech until
confirmation from the Debtors' counsel that the New Equipment has
been installed and is operating.

     (d) Supertech releases Debtors, and their respective agents,
servants, employees, attorneys, officers, and/or directors with
respect to all claims that could have been brought in connection
with the Turnover Motion, or otherwise related to the hoists at
issue and referenced in the Turnover Motion and the New Equipment.

     (e) Supertech will reduce its Proof of Claim by any amounts
paid pursuant to the 9019 Motion as well as any costs or expenses
(i.e. cost of labor) related to the installation of the hoists,
that have been saved by virtue of not having to perform said
installation work, if any.

     (f) United, Supertech's representative (Mr. Paskin), and
representatives of Debtors will not leave the Property until the
New Equipment is functioning property and performances can occur at
the Property in the ordinary course of business.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb18-50132-243.pdf

                   About The Wall Street Theater

The Wall Street Theater, listed in the National Register of
Historic Places, has re-emerged as a 501c3 non-profit organization,
whose mission is to provide diverse programming and promote arts
education, thereby enriching the cultural life of the greater
Norwalk community. The Wall Street Theater --
https://www.wallstreettheater.com/ -- adopts its moniker from its
location and its mission from its history, combining live shows,
interactive entertainment, cinema, digital production, art space
and a community arena in which to play.

Wall Street Theater Company, Inc., and affiliates Wall Street
Master Landlord, LLC and Wall Street Managing Member, LLC, filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Conn. Lead Case No. 18-50132) on
Feb. 4, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Suzanne Cahill, president, the WS
Theater Company and WS Master Landlord estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities
while WS Managing Member estimated less than $50,000 in assets and
$10 million to $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Julie A. Manning is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Green & Sklarz, LLC, as legal counsel; R.J.
Reuter, LLC as financial advisor; Wellspeak, Dugas & Kane, LLC as
real estate appraiser and consultant; and CohnReznick as auditor.


WINDSOR MARKETING: Judge Signs 9th Interim Cash Collateral Order
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James J. Tancredi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut has signed a ninth interim order
authorizing Windsor Marketing Group, Inc. to use cash collateral in
the ordinary course of its business.

The Debtor needs funding for payment of expenses as set forth on
the budget beginning June 8 through August 31, 2018.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor's books and records reflect
that the Debtor was indebted and liable to People's United Bank
under:

     (a) a Revolver for $3,412,977;
     (b) a first capex loan for $190,024;
     (c) a term loan for $642,857; and
     (d) a second capex loan for $126,945

To secure the payment and performance of the Revolver, the Debtor
granted People's United Bank a security interest in, a lien on and
pledge and assignment of substantially all present and future
personal property of the Debtor.

The Debtor believes that State of Connecticut Department of
Economic and Community Development ("DECD") may assert interests in
some portion of the cash collateral.  As of the Petition Date, the
DECD asserts that the Debtor was indebted and liable to the DECD
under:

     (a) a First Assistance Agreement for $207,994.79; and
     (b) a Second Assistance Agreement for $1,502,223.21,

subject to reinstatement of indebtedness that was subject to a loan
forgiveness credit under the First Assistance Agreement.

As adequate protection to People's United Bank and DECD for the
Debtor's use of cash collateral and for any actual diminution in
the value of the collateral, People's United Bank and DECD are
granted, nunc pro tunc to the Petition Date, the following, to be
accorded the same priority as between People's United Bank and DECD
as their respective liens and security interests had against the
prepetition collateral as of the Petition Date:

     (a) A continuing post-petition lien and security interest in
all pre-petition property of the Debtor as it existed on the
Petition Date, of the same type against which People's United Bank
and DECD held validly perfected liens and security interests as of
the Petition Date; and

     (b) A continuing post-petition lien in all property acquired
by the Debtor after the Petition Date of the same type against
which the People's United Bank and DECD held validly perfected
liens and security interests as of the Petition Date. However, the
Replacement Liens will not extend to any claims or causes of action
arising under chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code, including the
proceeds or property recovered in connection with the pursuit of
any such Avoidance Actions.

The replacement liens granted to People's United Bank and DECD
above will maintain the same priority, validity and enforceability
as People's United Bank's and DECD's liens had on the prepetition
collateral and will be recognized only to the extent of any actual
diminution in the value of the prepetition collateral resulting
from the use of cash collateral pursuant to the Order.

To the extent the replacement liens granted to People's United Bank
and DECD are insufficient to compensate People's United Bank or
DECD for any actual diminution in value of the cash collateral,
People's United Bank and DECD will be entitled to a super-priority
administrative claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 503(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code, and Lender and DECD will be entitled to the
protections of and the priority set forth in 11 U.S.C. Section
507(b).

The Court ordered that the Debtor pay DECD an adequate protection
payment of $5,000 on or before July 20, 2018, and to the extent not
yet paid, the adequate protection payment of $5,000 that was due
pursuant to a prior cash collateral order on or before June 20,
2018, and is to be paid by June 30, 2018.

A full-text copy of the Ninth Interim Cash Collateral Order is
available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb18-20022-219.pdf

                   About Windsor Marketing Group

Headquartered in Suffield, Connecticut, Windsor Marketing Group,
Inc. -- https://windsormarketing.com/ -- is a privately held
company that develops and implements innovative in-store marketing
programs for more than 3,000 clients, including some of the
nation's top retailers.  Founded in 1976, Windsor Marketing helps
retailers make their stores easier to shop, reduce turnaround times
and lower production and fulfillment costs.

Windsor Marketing Group filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Conn. Case No. 18-20022) on Jan. 8, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Kevin F. Armata, president, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtor's counsel is James Berman, Esq., at Zeisler & Zeisler,
P.C.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 on Jan. 22, 2018, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case. Lowenstein Sandler LLP, serves as counsel
to the Committee; Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C., as its
Connecticut counsel.


WW CONTRACTORS: FNB Asks Court to Prohibit Cash Collateral Use
--------------------------------------------------------------
First National Bank of Pennsylvania requests the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to prohibit WW Contractors, Inc.
from using its cash collateral or, alternatively, grant FNB
adequate protection.

Prior to the petition date, FNB provided (i) a Line of Credit in
the original amount of $3,500,000 which was subsequently reduced to
$3,000,000, and (ii) a $500,000 Term Loan to the Debtor. As of the
petition date, FNB was owed in excess of $3,447,000 under the
Loans.

FNB holds a first-priority duly perfected security interest and
lien in and against all of the Debtor's assets, including, without
limitation, all of the Debtor's accounts, accounts receivable and
deposit accounts, pursuant to the Line of Credit Loan Agreement,
the Term Loan Agreement.

By way of a letter dated June 15, 2018, FNB advised the Debtor that
it does not consent to the Debtor's use the FNB Cash Collateral and
that pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 363(c)(2), the Debtor is
prohibited from using any of the cash collateral absent a Court
order authorizing the Debtor to use such cash collateral.

The Debtor has filed a Motion seeking to use FNB's Cash Collateral.
FNB says the Debtor "baldly" alleges that secured creditors will
be provided adequate protection.  However, FNB asserts that the
Debtor's Motion to Use Cash Collateral in no way demonstrates how
FNB would be adequately protected by the Debtor's use of cash
collateral because:

      (1) There is no budget attached to the Motion to Use Cash
Collateral.

      (2) There is no cash flow analysis attached to the Motion to
Use cash Collateral.

      (3) The Debtor has not attached to its Motion to Use Cash
Collateral any projection of the accounts receivable that the
Debtor will generate post-petition, if any.

      (4) The Debtor has not opened a debtor in possession
account.

      (5) The Debtor has not provided any evidence that it has
segregated cash collateral as required by the Bankruptcy Code.

      (6) The Debtor has failed to establish that FNB will be
provided "adequate protection."

Counsel for First National Bank of Pennsylvania:

             Richard A. DuBose, III, Esq.
             Gebhardt & Smith LLP
             One South Street, Suite 2200
             Baltimore, Maryland 21202-3281
             Tel: 410-385-5039
             Fax: 410-385-5119
             Email: rdubo@gebsmith.com

                       About WW Contractors

WW Contractors, Inc. -- http://www.wwcontractors.com/-- is a
facilities services firm, offering complete facilities maintenance,
engineering, operations, custodial services, grounds/landscaping
services, and project management services to federal government,
local government, and private sector clients. WW Contractors was
founded in 1986 as an electrical construction firm under the
ownership and direction of Vietnam Era veteran Warren J. Wiggins.
The company is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland.

WW Contractors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-17927) on June 12, 2018. In the
petition signed by its president, Warren Wiggins, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and debts between $1 million
to $10 million.

Jeffrey M. Sirody, Esq., at Jeffrey M. Sirody and Associates, P.A.,
is the Debtor's counsel.

Pursuant to an order entered on June 14, 2018, the case was
transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District
of Virginia (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 18-12095).


[*] 2018 DI Conference Discount Tickets Available for Early Birds
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Early registration discount tickets are currently available for
Beard Group's 2018 Distressed Investing (DI) Conference to be held
Monday, Nov. 26, 2018.  The day-long program, marking the event's
25th year, will be held at The Harmonie Club, 4 East 60th Street,
New York, NY 10022. To register for the one-day conference visit:

          https://www.distressedinvestingconference.com/

Conway MacKenzie, Foley & Lardner, Longford Capital and Development
Specialist Inc. (DSI) will again be partnering with Beard Group as
it marks the conference's Silver Anniversary.  This milestone
denotes the event as the oldest, influential DI conference in the
U.S.

Debtwire will again be a media sponsor of the conference.

For a quarter of a century, the DI Conference's focus has been on
"Maximizing Profits in the Distressed Debt Market."  The event also
serves as a forum for leaders in corporate restructuring, lending
and debt and equity investments to gather and discuss the latest
topics and trends in the distressed investing industry, as well as
exchange ideas about high-profile chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings
and out-of-court restructurings. These are distinguished
professionals who place their resources and reputations at risk to
produce stellar results by preserving jobs, rebuilding broken
businesses, and efficiently redeploying underutilized assets in the
marketplace.

The conference will also feature the:

     * Luncheon presentation of the Harvey K Miller Award to
       Edward I. Altman, Professor of Finance, Emeritus, New York
       University's Stern School of Business. (The award will be
       presented by last year's winner billionaire Marc Lasry,
       Altman's former student.)

     * Evening awards dinner recognizing the 12 Outstanding
       Restructuring Lawyers

To learn how you can be a sponsor and participate in shaping the
day-long program, contact:

           Bernard Tolliver at bernard@beardgroup.com
                  or Tel: (240) 629-3300 x-149

To learn about media sponsorship opportunities to bring your outlet
into the view of leaders in corporate restructuring, lending and
debt and equity investments, and to expand your network of news
sources, contact:

                Jeff Baxt at jeff@beardgroup.com
                   or (240) 629-3300, ext 150


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from July 9 to 13, 2018
------------------------------------------------------

  Company                     Ticker  Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                     ------  ------ ---------   --------
Aegerion
  Pharmaceuticals Inc         AEGR     2.000    68.750  8/15/2019
Alpha Appalachia
  Holdings Inc                ANR      3.250     2.048   8/1/2015
American Tire
  Distributors Inc            ATD     10.250    29.679   3/1/2022
American Tire
  Distributors Inc            ATD     10.250    29.450   3/1/2022
Appvion Inc                   APPPAP   9.000     0.563   6/1/2020
Appvion Inc                   APPPAP   9.000     0.519   6/1/2020
Avaya Inc                     AVYA     7.000    78.622   4/1/2019
Avaya Inc                     AVYA    10.500     4.285   3/1/2021
Avaya Inc                     AVYA     9.000    78.417   4/1/2019
BPZ Resources Inc             BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2015
BPZ Resources Inc             BPZR     6.500     3.017   3/1/2049
Bon-Ton Department
  Stores Inc/The              BONT     8.000    17.250  6/15/2021
Calvary Chapel
  Surprise Inc                CALVRY   6.250    96.325   9/1/2038
Cenveo Corp                   CVO      6.000    37.000   8/1/2019
Cenveo Corp                   CVO      8.500     1.500  9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                   CVO      6.000    37.250   8/1/2019
Cenveo Corp                   CVO      8.500     1.125  9/15/2022
Cenveo Corp                   CVO      6.000     0.965  5/15/2024
Chassix Inc                   CHASSX   9.250    90.125   8/1/2018
Chassix Inc                   CHASSX   9.250    90.125   8/1/2018
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority       CHUKCH  10.250    67.000  5/30/2020
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE      9.000    63.000  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE      6.125    61.139  3/15/2020
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE      7.750     8.097   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE      9.000    62.000  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE      7.750     8.097   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE      9.000    61.069  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE      6.125    61.139  3/15/2020
Community Choice
  Financial Inc               CCFI    10.750    82.956   5/1/2019
Creditcorp                    CRECOR  12.000    99.750  7/15/2018
Creditcorp                    CRECOR  12.000    99.411  7/15/2018
DBP Holding Corp              DBPHLD   7.750    48.500 10/15/2020
DBP Holding Corp              DBPHLD   7.750    48.000 10/15/2020
EXCO Resources Inc            XCOO     8.500    17.000  4/15/2022
Egalet Corp                   EGLT     5.500    35.258   4/1/2020
Emergent Capital Inc          EMGC     8.500    72.941  2/15/2019
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc                 ENER     3.000     7.875  6/15/2013
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc            TXU      9.750    37.250 10/15/2019
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc            TXU     11.250    37.293  12/1/2018
Federal Home Loan Banks       FHLB     2.000    94.000 11/10/2026
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc     FLTW    14.000     3.557 12/15/2011
Gibson Brands Inc             GIBSON   8.875    85.250   8/1/2018
Gibson Brands Inc             GIBSON   8.875    84.147   8/1/2018
Gibson Brands Inc             GIBSON   8.875    85.250   8/1/2018
HCP Inc                       HCP      5.375   105.464   2/1/2021
Homer City Generation LP      HOMCTY   8.137    38.750  10/1/2019
Illinois Power Generating Co  DYN      6.300    33.375   4/1/2020
LBI Media Inc                 LBIMED  11.500    18.300  4/15/2020
Las Vegas Monorail Co         LASVMC   5.500     4.037  7/15/2019
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH      5.000     3.326   2/7/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH      2.000     3.326   3/3/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH      1.500     3.326  3/29/2013
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH      1.383     3.326  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH      2.070     3.326  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH      1.600     3.326  11/5/2011
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH      4.000     3.326  4/30/2009
Lehman Brothers Inc           LEH      7.500     1.226   8/1/2026
Linc USA GP / Linc
  Energy Finance USA Inc      LNCAU    9.625     2.559 10/31/2017
MModal Inc                    MODL    10.750     6.125  8/15/2020
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC            MPO     10.750     0.853  10/1/2020
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp            NGREFN  12.250     6.929  5/15/2019
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp            NGREFN  12.250     6.929  5/15/2019
New Gulf Resources LLC/
  NGR Finance Corp            NGREFN  12.250     6.929  5/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc        JNY      6.875    25.250  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc        JNY      8.250    26.063  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc        JNY      8.250    17.750  3/15/2019
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC          OMX      5.540     5.003  1/29/2020
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc     OREXQ    2.750     5.125  12/1/2020
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc     OREXQ    2.750     5.125  12/1/2020
PaperWorks Industries Inc     PAPWRK   9.500    54.125  8/15/2019
PaperWorks Industries Inc     PAPWRK   9.500    54.125  8/15/2019
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc                PTX      4.250    43.394   4/1/2021
Pernix Therapeutics
  Holdings Inc                PTX      4.250    43.394   4/1/2021
PetroQuest Energy Inc         PQUE    10.000    46.500  2/15/2021
Powerwave Technologies Inc    PWAV     1.875     0.133 11/15/2024
Powerwave Technologies Inc    PWAV     1.875     0.133 11/15/2024
Prospect Holding Co LLC /
  Prospect Holding
  Finance Co                  PRSPCT  10.250    48.250  10/1/2018
Renco Metals Inc              RENCO   11.500    27.000   7/1/2003
Rex Energy Corp               REXX     8.000    12.000  10/1/2020
Rex Energy Corp               REXX     8.875     1.750  12/1/2020
Rex Energy Corp               REXX     6.250     1.735   8/1/2022
Rex Energy Corp               REXX     8.000    11.735  10/1/2020
Rolta LLC                     RLTAIN  10.750     9.250  5/16/2018
Sears Holdings Corp           SHLD     8.000    47.602 12/15/2019
Sears Holdings Corp           SHLD     6.625    94.104 10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp           SHLD     6.625    93.748 10/15/2018
Sears Holdings Corp           SHLD     6.625    93.748 10/15/2018
Sempra Texas Holdings Corp    TXU      5.550    11.441 11/15/2014
Sempra Texas Holdings Corp    TXU      6.500    12.201 11/15/2024
ServiceSource
  International Inc           SREV     1.500    97.819   8/1/2018
SiTV LLC / SiTV Finance Inc   NUVOTV  10.375    59.500   7/1/2019
SiTV LLC / SiTV Finance Inc   NUVOTV  10.375    64.750   7/1/2019
Spectra Energy Capital LLC    SE       6.750    99.485  7/15/2018
TerraVia Holdings Inc         TVIA     5.000     4.644  10/1/2019
TerraVia Holdings Inc         TVIA     6.000     4.644   2/1/2018
Texas Competitive Electric
  Holdings Co LLC /
  TCEH Finance Inc            TXU     11.500     0.617  10/1/2020
Toys R Us - Delaware Inc      TOY      8.750     6.157   9/1/2021
Transworld Systems Inc        TSIACQ   9.500    26.000  8/15/2021
Transworld Systems Inc        TSIACQ   9.500    26.000  8/15/2021
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG     8.500     0.834  4/15/2021
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG     9.875     0.834 12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG     9.875     0.834 12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG     9.875     0.834 12/15/2020
Westmoreland Coal Co          WLBA     8.750    23.171   1/1/2022
Westmoreland Coal Co          WLBA     8.750    23.171   1/1/2022
iHeartCommunications Inc      IHRT    14.000    12.750   2/1/2021
iHeartCommunications Inc      IHRT    14.000    13.000   2/1/2021
iHeartCommunications Inc      IHRT    14.000    13.000   2/1/2021


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***