/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180622.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Friday, June 22, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 172

                            Headlines

1041 LITTLE EAST: Unsecured Creditors to Get 10% Over 10 Years
688 10th AVENUE: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
A V CAR & HOME: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
ABE'S BOAT: Taps Congeni Law Firm as New Legal Counsel
ACIS CAPITAL: DOJ Watchdog Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee

ACUSPORT CORP: Committee Taps Frost Brown as Co-Counsel
ADLER GROUP: Disclosure Statement Hearing Moved to Aug. 29
AIX ENERGY: Court Upholds Award of Damages to PI Plaintiffs
ANTHONY BROOKS: Proposes an Online Auction Sale of Equipment
ANTHONY BROOKS: Proposes Sale of Farm Equipment & Vehicles

APEX ADVISORS: Taps Bankruptcy Law Center as Legal Counsel
APPVION OPERATIONS: S&P Gives (P)B+ Rating on New $105MM Loan
ARC LIMITED: June 26 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
ARLINGTON COMPANY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
AUTO STRAP: Seeks Authority on Continued Cash Collateral Use

AVERY LAND: Amends Plan to Update Assets, Liabilities
BCML HOLDINGS: Bid for Default Final Judgment vs US Bank Tossed
BKH ACQUISITION: S&P Raises CCR to to 'CCC+', Outlook Stable
BLUE CHIP VENTURES: Confirmation Hearing Set for July 19
BLUE DOG AT 399: Taps Otterbourg P.C. as New Legal Counsel

BLUE RACER: Moody's Hikes $850MM Notes to B2 & Rates New Notes B2
BLUE RACER: S&P Rates Proposed $300MM Unsec. Notes Due 2026 'B'
BOBBY HUTCHINS: Dodds Buying Franklin Property for $1.2M
BURGER KING: S&P Affirms Then Withdraws 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating
BURLINGTON STORES: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms 'BB' CCR

C & J ENERGY: Summary Judgment Ruling in Favor of AEP Reversed
CARE ONE HOME: Taps Leiderman Shelomith as Co-Counsel
CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: Seeks OK on Cash Collateral Deal
CHAPELDALE PROPERTIES: Griffin Buying Baltimore Lot for $100K
CHASE MONARCH: Ct. Won't Review Ruling on Medawar Lease Agreement

CHINA FISHERY: Sets Sale Procedures for Golf Club Membership
CKSB LLC: Dhillion Buying San Bernardino Property for $2.8 Million
COMMUNITY HEALTH: Releases Final Results of Exchange Offers
CONIFER VETERINARY: Falck Trust Seeks Appointment of Ch. 11 Trustee
CPI CARD: David Rowntree Quits as Director

DEBORAH & DANIELLE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on June 27
DENT DEPOT: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on August 1
DHANANI GROUP: S&P Assigns 'B' Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
DIAMOND CONTRACT: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 25
EARTH PRIDE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 18

EDWARD DON: Moody's Assigns 'B2' CFR & 'B3' 1st Lien Loan Rating
ELAN MEDICAL: Employment Practice Insurance Proceeds Cut to $10K
FILBIN LAND: Proposes to Sell Westley Property to Pay Claims
FIRST PHOENIX-WESTON: Files Plan Funded by Wanxiang Cash Infusion
FORD STEEL: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on August 28

FRASER'S BOILER: First Amended Disclosure Statement Filed
FUNERAL SERVICES: Unsecureds to Get Nothing Under Exit Plan
GENUINE FINANCIAL: Moody's Assigns 'B3' CFR, Outlook Stable
GILDED AGE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 11
GILLETTE INVESTMENTS: Aug. 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing

H.C. JEFFRIES TOWER: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Aug. 28
HARDROCK HDD: Court Withdraws J. Patrick Procedural Admissions
HARRIS FINANCIAL: Amends Plan to Increase Secured Creditor Payments
HELIOS AND MATHESON: Will Issue $164M in Convertible Notes
HENRY MELTON: Roock Buying NFL Retirement Plans

HH & JR INC: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for July 17
HITS AFRICA: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Cayman Liquidation
HNRC DISSOLUTION: Alliance Bid to Enforce Sale Order Nixed
HOUSTON FOODS: Moody's Assigns B3 Corp. Family Rating
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Expands Board to 8 Members

JAMES CHANDLER: Carvers Buying Sunflower Property for $240K
LDR INDUSTRIES: District Court Junks Schagrin Lawsuit
LITCHFIELD LASER: Taps Blum Shapiro as Accountant
LITCHFIELD LASER: Taps Lawrence & Jurkiewicz as Legal Counsel
M2 SYSTEMS: ProHealth Pharmacy Buying Property for $3.2K

MANUGRAPH AMERICAS: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 26
MARBLE MASTERS: Taps Boyer Terry as Legal Counsel
MAY ARTS: Unsecured Creditors to Receive 1.5% Distribution
MESOBLAST LIMITED: Appoints Former Anthem CEO to Board
MGM RESORTS: Moody's Rates $500MM Unsec. Notes Due 2025 'Ba3'

MLW LLC: Taps Furr & Cohen as Legal Counsel
MOBILEDIRECT INC: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case
MOEINI CORP: Yi Xiang Ou Buying Foley Property for $1 Million
MONTGOMERY SERVICES: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
MWM & SONS: Sept. 5 Hearing on Plan and Disclosure Statement

NEOVASC INC: First U.S. Patient Implanted with Reducer
NEW CITY: Baisley Park, Republic Carting Oppose Plan Outline
NORTHERN OIL: Agrees to Swap $22.8 Million Notes for Equity
OAK ROCK: Unsecureds to be Paid 35% Under Liquidating Plan
ONTARIO CENTURY: Gets Court Approval for Liquidating Plan

OSIES INC: July 11 Disclosure Statement Hearing
PADCO PRESSURE: Trustee Selling Interest in All Equipment for $1M
PARKWAY RADIOLOGY: ADR Buying All Assets for $900K
PATTY DEWITT: Has $750K Upset Bid for Morgantown Property
PAUL J. HATHAWAY: Court Rejects Bid to Dismiss Nelsons' Suit

PRODUCTION PATTERN: Unsecureds to Get 100% Over 7 Years at 4%
PROJECT ANGEL: Fitch Gives First-Time 'B' IDR, Outlook Stable
PROJECT ANGEL: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
PROVIDENCE WIRELESS: Unsecureds to Get 100% Lump Sum Payment
Q&C PROPERTIES: Proposes Plan to Exit Chapter 11 Protection

RANDALL KEITH SMALL: Court Orders Law Firm to Disgorge $4,467
RELATIVITY FASHION: Metz Claims vs CEO Barred by Plan Releases
RICHARD CASTRONOVA: Has $400K Offer for West Milford Property
RIEDESEL ENGINEERING: Selling Interest in 2011 Ford F-150 for $11K
ROGERS & SON: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 26

SAM MEYERS: Hollenbach Buying Louisville Property for $1.2M
SANCILIO PHARMACEUTICALS: Taps Greenberg Traurig as Legal Counsel
SHAMROCK CREEK: Taps Genova & Malin as Legal Counsel
SHARING ECONOMY: Extends Exclusivity Pact with ECrent by 18 Months
SOUTHERN DESIGN: Plan Payments to be Funded by Sale or Refinancing

SPRING TREE: DOJ Watchdog Seeks Approval of M. Smith as Trustee
STATESBORO LIFE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for July 17
STINAR HG: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 18
STONE PROJECTS: Initial Funds for Plan Distribution Cut to $6.5K
SUNSET PARTNERS: Court Denies C. Brown Bid to Enjoin Cantina Sale

TCS/JMJ SNOWDEN: Unsecureds to Get Interest Under 2nd Amended Plan
TEXDOM INVESTMENTS: Unsecureds to be Paid 50% Under Exit Plan
THIRTY WOODHOLLOW: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
TOYS R US: Court OKs Assignment of Brea I Lease to BCFWC
TWO BAR O COUNTRY: Plan Be Funded by Sale of Property

VER TECHNOLOGIES: Plan Relies on $1.75 Billion Valuation
VIDAL ROSARIO LEON: Ct. Won't Review Denial of Bermudez Claims
VVC HOLDING: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
WARM HEART FAMILY: Taps Bud Stephen Tayman as Legal Counsel
WEBSTER PARK: S&P Assigns Prelim B- Rating on $5MM Cl. E-R Notes

WILL NELSON: Watson Buying Memphis Property for $110K
WORLD GLOBAL: Court Directs DOJ Watchdog to Appoint Examiner
WRAP MEDIA: Court Tentatively Approves Luckett, IPL Plan Outline
Z-1 MANAGEMENT: Real Equity Buying Memphis Property for $300K
[*] The Incredible Shrinking Bankruptcy Case

[^] BOOK REVIEW: The Financial Giants In United States History

                            *********

1041 LITTLE EAST: Unsecured Creditors to Get 10% Over 10 Years
--------------------------------------------------------------
1041 Little East Neck Road, LLC, and its debtor affiliates filed
second amended disclosure statements explaining their separate
plans of reorganizations proposing to pay creditors from the income
they generate from their gas stations and convenience stores.

Holders of general unsecured claims will be paid a Distribution of
10% of the amount of their claims, on a Pro Rata basis, without
interest, for a Plan Distribution Period of ten (10) years after
confirmation of the Plan.

General Unsecured Claims against 1041 Little East Neck Road total
$71,622.  This class of creditors will be paid equal monthly
payments at $60 per month with payments over the Plan Distribution
Period totaling $7,162.  This class comprises the general unsecured
portions of the claims of DTF ($150), as well as the entire claims
of Harold Levinson Associates, Inc. ($37,350).

General Unsecured Claims against 956 Little East Neck Road total
$289,746.  This class of creditors will be paid equal monthly
payments at $241 per month with payments over the Plan Distribution
Period totaling $28,975.  This class comprises the general
unsecured portions of the claims of DTF ($9,898), as well as the
entire claims of OK Petroleum Distr. Corp. ($203,018), Island Pump
and Tank ($1,100), Chase Ink ($11,346), Harold Levinson Associates,
Inc. ($19,700), and Robert F. Schade, CPA P.C. ($4,300).

General Unsecured Claims against 945 Little East Neck Road total
$441,681.  This class of creditors will be paid equal monthly
payments at $368 per month with payments over the Plan Distribution
Period totaling $44,168.  This class comprises the general
unsecured portions of the claims of DTF ($34,422), OK Petroleum
Distr. Corp. ($211,381), and OK Petroleum Intern. ($11,964) as well
as the entire claims of Claire Rose Distr. ($6,549), Chase Ink
($29,812), Harold Levinson Associates, Inc. ($42,000), and Robert
F. Schade, CPA P.C. ($4,300).

A full-text copy of 1041 Little East Neck Road's Second Amended
Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb16-74896-75.pdf

A full-text copy of 956 Little East Neck Road's Second Amended
Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb16-74898-79.pdf

A full-text copy of 945 Little East Neck Road's Second Amended
Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb16-74897-87.pdf

                  About 1041 Little East Neck Road

1041 Little East Neck Road LLC, 945 Little East Neck Road LLC and
956 Little East Neck Road LLC are New York limited liability
companies that operate gasoline service stations along a stretch of
Little East Neck Road, in West Babylon, New York.  1041 Little East
Neck Road et al. have owned these businesses since 2005.  Each gas
station primarily sells gas, but like most gas stations today, each
also sells convenience store items such as beverages, cigarettes,
snacks and lottery tickets.  In addition, one of the gas stations,
956 Little East Neck Road, has mechanic bays that are rented out.

1041 Little East Neck Road, et al., sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case Nos. 16-74896 to
16-74898) on Oct. 20, 2016.  The petitions were signed by Muhammet
Ozen, member.

The Court entered an order dated October 25, 2016, administratively
consolidating these cases. The cases are assigned to Judge Robert
E. Grossman. The Debtors are represented by Craig D. Robins, Esq.,
as counsel.

At the time of the filing, 1041 Little East disclosed $554,177 in
assets and $1,240,000 in liabilities.  945 Little East reported
total assets of $361,256 and total debts of $1.19 million.
Meanwhile, 956 Little East disclosed $173,539 in assets and $1.02
million in liabilities.

The United States Trustee's Office has not appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors in any of the Debtors' cases.


688 10th AVENUE: Sets Bidding Procedures for All Assets
-------------------------------------------------------
688 10th Avenue Restaurant Corp. asks the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to authorize the bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all assets
and related personal property at auction.

The bankruptcy filing was precipitated by an Americans with
Disabilities Act lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of New York, Case No. 17-cv-5009, payroll tax
obligations owed to the Internal Revenue Service, as well as
obligations to general creditors.  E & W Realty, LLC ("Landlord")
is a co-defendant along with the Debtor in the ADA Action.

The Debtor filed the chapter 11 case so that it could continue to
operate while pursuing a sale of its assets.  It intends to
reorganize by selling its business as a going concern through an
auction process under the supervision of the Court.

The Debtor is a party to the Lease with the Landlord for a ground
floor storefront located at 688 10th Avenue, New York, New York.
It currently has a deadline of July 5, 2018 to assume or reject the
Lease.

The Debtor's business broker, Great American Brokerage, Inc.,
managed by Paul Fetscher, has been marketing the Purchased Assets
since April 5, 2018 and, by the date of the auction, the Broker
will have marketed the assets for approximately three months.
Despite the Debtor's robust marketing process, to date, none of the
interested potential bidders has come forward to serve as a
stalking horse for the Sale process.  So, in the interests of time
due to the approaching Lease Rejection Deadline, and in order to
maintain maximum flexibility with respect to the Sale, the Debtor
has opted to push forward with the auction process.

The Debtor believes that, once bid deadlines and procedures are in
place, interested parties will commit and that a competitive
bidding process will result.  The Sale of the Purchased Assets
contemplated herein is subject to a competitive Auction process
that will assure that the maximum value for the Purchased Assets
will be realized for the Debtor's estate and its creditors.
Accordingly, the Debtor has filed the Motion asking the approval of
the Bidding Procedures and, following a subsequent hearing (i.e.,
the Sale Hearing), approval of the Sale of the Purchased Assets.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: June 22, 2018 at 5 p.m. (ET)

     b. Deposit: $10,000

     c. Auction: If the Debtor receives more than one Qualified Bid
from Qualified Bidders, it will conduct an Auction commencing at
10:00 a.m. (ET) on June 26, 2018 at Morrison Tenenbaum PLLC, 87
Walker Street, Floor 2, New York, New York, 10013 or such other
time or place as the Debtor, at least two (2) business days before
the Auction, notifies all Qualified Bidders who have submitted
Qualified Bids.

     d. Bid Increments: $5,000

     e. Sale Hearing: TBD

     f. Sale Closing: July 5, 2018

     g. Credit Bid: Those parties with a lien that secures an
allowed claim may credit bid.  The Secured Creditors must comply
with the bid requirements to be deemed a Qualified Bidder including
the posting of a Good Faith Deposit.

     h. Break-up Fee: 3%

     i. The Potential Bidder will pay any and all cure costs
associated with the assumption of any unexpired leases or executory
contracts.

A copy of the Bidding Procedures and APA attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/688_10th_48_Sales.pdf

The Debtor will cause to be served, within five business days after
issuance of the Bidding Procedures Order, the Notice of Bid
Deadline, Auction, and Sale Hearing upon all Notice Parties.  It
will send the Notice of Assumption and Assignment within five
business days of the date of the issuance of the Bidding Procedures
Order to its Landlord.  The Assumption and/or Cure Objection must
be filed with the Court and served upon the Objection Notice
Parties so as to be actually received no later than the Sale
Objection Deadline.

The effective date of any assumption, sale and assignment of the
Lease will be the Closing.  Accordingly, any Cure Amounts to be
paid under the Lease will be paid in accordance with the Purchase
Agreement of the Prevailing Bidder upon or as soon as reasonably
practicable after the Closing Date or as soon thereafter as the
Cure Amount is fixed by the Court or agreed upon by the Debtor, the
Prevailing Bidder and the objecting party.

The Debtor asks that at the conclusion of the Sale Hearing, that
the Court enters the Sale Order approving the proposed sale of the
Purchased Assets, free and clear of Liabilities (except for
Liabilities assumed by the Prevailing Bidder) in accordance with
the terms and conditions contained in the Purchase Agreement to the
Prevailing Bidder, authorizing the assumption and assignment of the
Lease in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, and granting such
other relief as is necessary to effectuate the transactions
contemplated by the Purchase Agreement.

Finally, it asks that the Court waives the 14-day stay that
otherwise may be applicable under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and
6006(d), so that each of the Bidding Procedures Order and the Sale
Order is effective immediately upon entry.

               About 688 10th Avenue Restaurant

688 10th Avenue Restaurant Corp. operates a Cuban style restaurant
located at 688 10th Avenue, New York.

688 10th Avenue Restaurant sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-46576) on Dec. 7,
2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge
Elizabeth S. Stong presides over the case.  Morrison Tenenbaum PLLC
is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel; and Great American Brokerage
Inc. is its real estate broker.  On April 5, 2018, the Court
appointed Great American Brokerage, Inc., managed by Paul Fetscher,
as its business broker.


A V CAR & HOME: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
-------------------------------------------------
Debtor: A V Car & Home, LLC
        309 H St, NW
        Washington, DC 20001

Business Description: A V Car & Home, LLC, based in Washington,
                      DC, is engaged in activities related to real

                      estate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 20, 2018

Case No.: 18-00434

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.)

Judge: Hon. Martin S. Teel, Jr.

Debtor's Counsel: Justin Philip Fasano, Esq.
                  MCNAMEE HOSEA
                  6411 Ivy Lane, Ste. 200
                  Greenbelt, MD 20770
                  Tel: 301-441-2420
                  Fax: 301-982-9450
                  Email: jfasano@mhlawyers.com

                    - and -

                  Janet M. Nesse, Esq.
                  MCNAMEE HOSEA
                  6411 Ivy Lane, Suite 200
                  Greenbelt, MD 20770
                  Tel: 301-441-2420
                  Email: jnesse@mhlawyers.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Shawntell Parker, authorized
representative.

The Debtor lists Welch Family Limited Partnership as its sole
unsecured creditor holding a contingent and unliquidated claim of
$0.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/dcb18-00434.pdf


ABE'S BOAT: Taps Congeni Law Firm as New Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc., received interim approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana to hire
Congeni Law Firm, LLC as its new legal counsel.

Congeni will replace The Lott Firm PLLC, the firm initially tapped
by the Debtor in connection with its Chapter 11 case.

Leo Congeni, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
charges an hourly fee of $250.  Paralegals charge $85 per hour.

The Debtor has agreed to pay the firm an advance deposit of
$7,500.

Mr. Congeni disclosed in a court filing that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

         Leo D. Congeni, Esq.
         Congeni Law Firm, LLC
         424 Gravier Street
         New Orleans, LA 70130
         Phone: (504) 522-4848
         Fax: (914) 992-0378
         E-mail: leo@congenilawfirm.com

                    About Abe's Boat Rentals

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc. -- https://www.abesboatrental.com/ -- is a
privately-owned vessel operator located in Belle Chasse, Louisiana
with a fleet of 19 vessels.  The Company's business segments have
expanded to also provide crews and vessels for environmental
construction, restoration projects and cleanup, plugging and
abandonment, rig decommissioning and other new markets.  Abe's Boat
Rentals was founded in 1979 by Abraham Ton.

Abe's Boat Rentals, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
La. Case No. 18-11102) on April 27, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Hank Ton, president, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.  Marc Hoerner, Jr., Esq., at The
Lott Firm, is the Debtor's counsel.


ACIS CAPITAL: DOJ Watchdog Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas has
issued an order directing the U.S. Trustee to appoint one trustee
in the jointly-administered Chapter 11 cases of ACIS Capital
Management, L.P., and ACIS Capital Management GP, LLC.

Joshua N. Terry filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions against each
of the two Debtors on Jan. 30, 2018.  At the request of Mr. Terry,
the Court set a status conference on May 14.  On May 11, the Court
entered an order converting the cases to Chapter 11 and an order
directing the Trustee to appoint a trustee for the Chapter 11
estates.

On May 14, 2018, the United States Trustee filed the Chapter 11
Notice of Appointment of Trustee and of Amount of Bond.  The
Trustee Notice appoints Robin Phelan the Chapter 11 Trustee of Acis
LP.

At the Conference, the United States Trustee reported he intended
to appoint two trustees in these cases.

The Court, having jurisdiction to consider the Issue, the arguments
of counsel and testimony of witnesses, and for the reasons stated
on the record, directs the U.S. Trustee to appoint only one Chapter
11 Trustee for the Debtors' estates.

The Acis LP Trustee is permitted to operate independently of Acis
GP and the direction of Acis GP, without regard to applicable
partnership law or agreements between the Debtors, until further
order of this Court.


ACUSPORT CORP: Committee Taps Frost Brown as Co-Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of AcuSport
Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Ohio to hire Frost Brown Todd LLC.

Frost Brown will serve as co-counsel with Goldstein & McClintock
LLLP, the firm tapped by the committee to be its lead bankruptcy
counsel.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Members        $370 to $595
     Associates     $205 to $345
     Paralegals     $100 to $195

Douglas Lutz, Esq., at Frost Brown, disclosed in a court filing
that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Frost Brown can be reached through:

     Douglas L. Lutz, Esq.
     Frost Brown Todd LLC
     3300 Great American Tower
     301 East Fourth Street
     Cincinnati, OH 45202
     Tel: 513.651.6724
     Fax: 513.651.6981

                    About AcuSport Corporation

Based in Bellefontaine, Ohio, AcuSport Corporation is a nationwide
distributor of shooting sports products and business solutions for
the independent firearms retailer with regional sales offices in
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Minnesota, Texas, Montana and
California.

AcuSport Corporation, based in Bellefontaine, OH, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Ohio Case No. 18-52736) on May 1, 2018.
In the petition signed by CFO John K. Flanagan, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50 million to
$100 million in liabilities.

The Hon. John E. Hoffman Jr. presides over the case.

The Debtor hired Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, as general
counsel; Allen Kuehnle Stovall & Neuman LLP, as local counsel;
Huron Transaction Advisory LLC, as investment banker; Huron
Consulting Services LLC, as financial advisor; and Donlin Recano &
Company, Inc. as claims noticing and solicitation agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on May 10, 2018.  The committee tapped
Goldstein & McClintock LLLP as lead counsel; and BDO USA, LLP as
financial advisor.


ADLER GROUP: Disclosure Statement Hearing Moved to Aug. 29
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico moved the
hearing on Adler Group Inc.'s disclosure statement to August 29
from August 8. The hearing will take place at 9:00 a.m., at
Courtroom 3.

                     About Adler Group Inc.

Adler Group Inc. owns the Caguas Military property located at Carr
189 km 3.1 (interior) Rincon Ward, Gurabo Puerto Rico, which is
valued at $3 million.  It holds inventory and equipment worth
$513,870.  For 2015, the Company posted gross revenue of $1.61
million 2015 and gross revenue of $1.91 million for 2014.

Adler Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 17-02727) on April 20, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Jose Torres Gonzalez, authorized representative,
the Debtor disclosed $3.52 million in assets and $4.43 million in
liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Mildred Caban Flores.

The Debtor hired MRO Attorneys at Law, LLC, as bankruptcy counsel.


AIX ENERGY: Court Upholds Award of Damages to PI Plaintiffs
-----------------------------------------------------------
Defendants-Appellants AIX Energy Inc. and its insurer, St. Paul
Fire & Marine Insurance Company in the case captioned JEREMY
SHEPHARD AND EMILY SHEPHARD AND MICHAEL JACKSON AND TAMISIA
JACKSON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AIX ENERGY, INC., AIX OPERATING
COMPANY, BEAR CREEK SERVICES, LLC, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY, AVERY GRAVES IV, REPUBLIC WELL TESTING,
Defendants-Appellants, No. 51,965-CA (La. App.), appeal a jury
verdict that awarded the plaintiffs, Jeremy Shephard and Michael
Jackson, a total of $22.45 million for burns and other losses
sustained in a natural gas fire that occurred on an oil well where
they were working. AIX and St. Paul also contest several of the
district court's pretrial and post-trial rulings.

The Court of Appeals of Louisiana affirms in part, but amends the
judgment to make certain elements of the damage award conform to
the trial evidence and to limit St. Paul's post-judgment interest
to the final amount of the judgment, and render.

Shephard, Jackson and their wives filed this personal injury action
in June 2014 in Caddo Parish. In October 2015, AIX Energy and AIX
Operating Co. filed for bankruptcy protection. Pursuant to an
agreement, the bankruptcy court lifted the stay to allow Shephard
and Jackson to proceed against AIX's liability insurance policies
and proceeds, with the proviso that they would file no claim
against the bankrupt's estate.

Among many other pretrial motions filed by the parties, AIX filed a
Daubert motion to exclude the plaintiffs' expert, William D.
Griffin, a chemical engineer, from testifying in the field of
petroleum engineering. After an extensive hearing in early December
2016, the district court denied the defense motion and allowed
Griffin to testify as tendered.

AIX urges the jury erred in assigning 97.5% fault to AIX, 2% to
Bear Creek, 0.5% to Graves, and 0% to Dykes, Jackson, Shephard and
State Line. The argument is fact-intensive and retraces the
drilling history of the Bud Meadors No. 3. AIX contends that Dykes
was at fault for allowing gas to accumulate at the well site for
30-45 minutes (a situation that State Line's driver described as
"gassy") and for using its own flowback tank and pump, which were
too close to the well; Jackson was at fault for not following usual
safety protocols, particularly for failing to move the pump at
least 50 feet from the gas source; Graves was at fault for
approving the placement of the pump and tank, although he was
correct in saying that 2% KCL is "pretty standard" as completion
fluid. Mostly, however, AIX contends it was not at fault, because
the plaintiffs' theories about how the accident happened are simply
flawed: the notion that 2% KCL was improper is "scientifically
erroneous," it is not standard practice for the operator to write a
completion plan, "cleanout" is a basic, routine and safe operation,
and the plaintiffs lodged ad hominem attacks on AIX's operations
manager, Andrew Imel.

The Court does not find the jury's allocation of fault to be
plainly wrong or manifestly erroneous. The compendious testimony
easily shows that AIX controlled the operation at Bud Meadors No.
3. AIX's operations manager, Imel, gave orders to the completion
consultant, Graves, who relayed those orders to the toolpusher,
Jackson, who, in turn, directed the crew. Imel failed to calculate
the fluid weight, sent the wrong completion fluid for the job, was
not aware which fluid he should have sent, and did not give Graves
the data that would have enabled him to correct the problem.
Notably, Imel hired Graves to work on two separate wells, and he
was at the other well, on AIX's business, when the Bud Meadors No.
3 exploded. In light of AIX's superior position, control over the
operation, and failure to recognize the danger posed by his action,
the Court does not find the allocation of 97.5% fault to AIX, and
only 0.5% to Graves, to be plainly wrong. The Court also finds no
manifest error in the jury's decision to absolve Jackson, Shephard,
Dykes Oil Co. and State Line Vacuum.

AIX also urges the district court erred in denying AIX and St.
Paul's Daubert motion and allowing the plaintiffs' expert, Griffin,
to testify regarding two "specious and unreliable theories" of
liability. AIX specifically contests Griffin's view that AIX should
have used a completion fluid weighing at least 10.5 PPG, and his
theory, stated at the Daubert hearing, that a "sand bridge" must
have formed around 11:30 the morning of the fire, trapped a large
amount of gas, then dispersed suddenly around 3:00 that afternoon,
creating the pent-up formation that erupted and caught fire. AIX
brands these views "junk science," belied by the science and
history of the well, and soundly refuted by AIX's expert, Watson,
who wrote a book on well control and testified that gas will rise
to the surface no matter how heavy the completion fluid. AIX
concludes that the legal error of allowing Griffin's testimony
tainted the verdict and required de novo review.

Th Court does not find the district court abused its discretion in
allowing Griffin to express his opinion. In light of his
credentials and the importance of the issue to the case, the court
was entitled to let the jury hear Griffin's opinion and give it
appropriate weight vis-a-vis the documentary evidence, lay
testimony and the other expert's opinion. This assignment of error
lacks merit.

Thus, the Court affirms the jury's findings and allocation of
fault, its awards of general damages and future medical expenses,
and the district court's rulings on the various motions contested
in the appeal. The Court amends, however, the jury's awards of
Jackson's loss of future earning capacity to $600,000, and of
Shephard's future lost wages to $1,650,030. The judgment against
St. Paul is amended to reduce the final awards proportionately. The
Court also amends the judgment to award post-judgment interest only
on the final judgments, as reduced by the bankruptcy court order.

A full-text copy of the Court's Decision dated May 23, 2018 is
available for free at https://bit.ly/2LVzxjy from Leagle.com.

COOK, YANCEY, KING & GALLOWAY, By: Sidney E. Cook, Jr. --
sidney.cook@cookyancey.com -- Lisa C. Cronin, John T. Kalmbach --
john.kalmbach@cookyancey.com -- David J. Hemken --
david.hemken@cookyancey.com -- Counsel for Defendants-Appellants
AIX Energy, Inc. and St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.

MAHTOOK & LAFLEUR, By: Ward F. LaFleur -- wlafleur@mandllaw.com --
Richard J. Hymel -- rhymel@mandllaw.com -- GREGORIO, CHAFIN,
JOHNSON, POOLSON & TABOR, LLC, By: Scott Chafin, Jr. --
schafin@gcj-law.com -- Julie Payne Johnson , Counsel for
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Jeremy Shephard and Emily Shephard, and
Michael Jackson & Tamisia Jackson.

ROBERT L. SIEGEL, RACHEL G. WEBRE, JAMESON MICHAEL TAYLOR, Counsel
for Defendants-Appellees, National, Union Fire Ins. Co., AIG,
Specialty Ins. Co. a/k/a Chartis Ins. Co.

LUNN, IRION, SALLEY, ET AL., By: Gerald M. Johnson, Jr., Counsel
for Defendants-Appellees Bear Creek, Services, LLC and Avery,
Graves, IV.

JOHNSON, RAHMAN & THOMAS, By: Patricia Jackson Delpit, Counsel for
LWCC, Intervener-Appellee.

                     About AIX Energy

AIX Energy, Inc., is an oil and gas exploration and production
company.  AIX's business includes drilling oil and gas wells and
selling the petroleum products that result from such drilling
activities.  As such, AIX acquires and holds drilling and
production rights over various tracts of land located in Louisiana
through a number of oil, gas and mineral leases.

AIX Energy sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 15-34245) on Oct. 22, 2015.  The petition was signed
by Robert A. Imel, president.

The AIX case was originally assigned to Judge Barbara J. Houser,
but was transferred to Judge Stacey G.C. Jernigan, who oversees the
bankruptcy case of Antero Energy Partners.

AIX tapped The Harvey Law Firm, P.C., as counsel when it filed for
bankruptcy.  The Debtor won approval to engage Orenstein Law Group,
P.C., as special counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors won approval to
retain Michael S. Haynes and the firm Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP as
counsel.

                            *     *      *

The Sec. 341(a) meeting of creditors was held Nov. 19, 2015, which
was continued to Jan. 5, 2016.

AIX on Feb. 12, 2016, filed a motion to extend by 90 days its
exclusive period to propose a Chapter 11 plan by May 19, 2016, and
its exclusive period to solicit acceptances of that that plan by
Aug. 19, 2016.  No order was entered.

Instead, the Court on March 23 entered an order directing the
appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in AIX's case.

On March 14, 2016, Judge Houser held a hearing on the motion for
joint administration of the Chapter 11 cases of AIX and Antero.  At
the conclusion of the hearing, the Court determined not to order
the joint administration of the cases and further determined to
transfer the AIX case to Judge Jernigan.

On March 18, 2016, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
and LegacyTexas Bank entered a stipulation extending the
Investigation Period as defined in  Final DIP the Order with
respect to the Committee is extended through and including April
21, 2016.


ANTHONY BROOKS: Proposes an Online Auction Sale of Equipment
------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony D. Brooks and Amy J. Brooks ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of Illinois to authorize them to sell farm
equipment and titled vehicles at online, retail auction sales over
a period of approximately 60-days.

The Debtors have ceased operating their own farming business for
the 2018 season, and Mr. Brooks has been employed as a farm manager
by Middle Ground Farms, LLC.  Pursuant to Court order dated March
28, 2018, the Debtors retained Middle Ground as sales consultant to
assist with the orderly liquidation of their grain holdings, cattle
inventory and certain equipment and titled vehicles.

By the Motion, they ask authority to sell the Equipment, which the
Debtors have determined are not essential to their reorganization
efforts.

A copy of the list of Equipment to be sold attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Anthony_Brooks_98_Sales.pdf

The applicable lienholders include John Deere Financial, F&M Bank,
U.S. Bank and First Midwest Bank.  While John Deere Financial, F&M
Bank and U.S. Bank have first priority security interests on
specified items, First Midwest Bank has a blanket security interest
on all non-titled equipment.  With a few exceptions, the Debtors'
titled vehicles and trailers are unencumbered as they are holding
certificates of title without any noted lienholders.

The Debtors intend to list the Equipment for sale on
Tractorhouse®.com and associated AuctionTime.com® for online,
retail auction sales over a period of approximately 60-days.
They'll set minimum bid prices based on appraised values of the
Equipment and in consultation with the secured creditors, who will
reserve the right to credit bid their secured claims.
Tractorhouse®.com typically charges $200 per item for four weeks
of advertising.  The Debtors are trying to negotiate a bulk
discount for the Proposed Sale, but will otherwise incur up to $400
per item for up to 8 weeks of advertising on Tractorhouse®.com.

With the exception of the Equipment in which John Deere Financial
holds first priority security interest, which is separately
addressed below, if the Equipment does not sell through
Tractorhouse®.com, Middle Ground will market any remaining
equipment to its extensive network of wholesale equipment buyers
and conduct a blind auction within 14 days following the conclusion
of the online sale process.  The lienholders will maintain the
right to credit bid their secured claims in the blind-auction.

With regard to John Deere Financial, if the applicable Equipment
does not sell through Tractorhouse®.com, the Debtors will work
with John Deere Financial to sell such Equipment through John
Deere's dealer and related network for used equipment sales.  In
connection with such sales, John Deere Financial has agreed to
charge no commission and to remit any sale proceeds in excess of
the remaining indebtedness to the Debtors immediately upon sale.

Pursuant to the final order authorizing the Debtors' use of cash
collateral and related budget, First Midwest Bank has consented to
the Debtors’ use of cash collateral to fund sale expenses.
Therefore, expenses related to the Proposed Sale will only be
deducted from sale proceeds associated with the collateral of First
Midwest Bank.

Accordingly, the Debtors ask Court authority to sell the Equipment
free and clear of any liens, claims and interests thereon, with all
liens to attach to the proceeds of the Equipment sales in
accordance with their respective priorities.  They also ask
authority to distribute sale proceeds to the applicable lienholders
upon completion of the Proposed Sale and the Court's approval of a
report of sale that identifies proposed distributions to secured
creditors.

Pursuant to section 363(k) of the Bankruptcy Code, the secured
creditors will have the right to credit bid their secured claims in
conjunction with the Proposed Sale.  The Debtors have already taken
steps to communicate with the secured creditors and accommodate
credit bidding in terms of establishing minimum bid prices for the
Equipment.

To ensure that the Proposed Sale can proceed promptly following the
entry of an order authorizing same, the Debtors ask that the Court
waive the 14-day stay pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 6004(h).  The
sooner the Debtors can sell the Equipment and pay off secured debt,
the less interest will accrue for oversecured creditors.

                   About Anthony and Amy Brooks

Anthony D. Brooks and Amy J. Brooks sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 18-80311) on
March 9, 2018.  Gordon Gouveia, Esq., at Shaw Fishman Glantz &
Towbin LLC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

On March 28, 2018, the Office of the United States Trustee
appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors, including
AgPerspective, Riden Farms Supply, Inc. and Herr Petroleum Corp.


ANTHONY BROOKS: Proposes Sale of Farm Equipment & Vehicles
----------------------------------------------------------
Anthony D. Brooks and Amy J. Brooks filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of Illinois a notice of their sale
of farm equipment and titled vehicles.

On May 31, 2018, the Debtors filed their Motion for Authority to
Sell Certain Farm Equipment and Titled Vehicles free and clear of
liens, claims and encumbrances.

The objection deadline is June 24, 2018.

                  About Anthony and Amy Brooks

Anthony D. Brooks and Amy J. Brooks sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Case No. 18-80311) on
March 9, 2018.  Gordon Gouveia, Esq., at Shaw Fishman Glantz &
Towbin LLC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

On March 28, 2018, the United States Trustee appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors, which includes AgPerspective,
Riden Farms Supply, Inc. and Herr Petroleum Corp.


APEX ADVISORS: Taps Bankruptcy Law Center as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Apex Advisors, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of California to hire Bankruptcy Law
Center, APC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan;
and provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Ahren Tiller             $475
     Brian McGoldrick         $425
     Associate Attorneys      $300
     Paralegal/Law Clerks     $100

Bankruptcy Law Center received a retainer of $10,000.

Each professional of Bankruptcy Law Center is "disinterested" as
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to
court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Ahren A. Tiller, Esq.
     Brian J. McGoldrick, Esq.
     Bankruptcy Law Center, APC
     1230 Columbia Street, Suite 1100
     San Diego, CA 92101
     Phone: (619) 894-8831
     Fax: (866) 444-7026  

                     About Apex Advisors Inc.

Apex Advisors, Inc. is an S-Corporation formed under the laws of
the State of Nevada.  Its principle place of business and corporate
headquarters are located at 300 Carlsbad Village Drive, Suite
108A-308, Carlsbad, California.   It owns two investment properties
in Paradise Valley, Arizona, and Cleveland, Ohio.

On April 30, 2018, Apex Advisors filed a Chapter 7 petition in
response to the pending foreclosure proceedings against its real
property located at 5301 E. Paradise Canyon Road, Paradise Valley,
Arizona.  The case was eventually converted to a Chapter 11 case
(Bankr. S.D. Calif. Case No. 18-02542).


APPVION OPERATIONS: S&P Gives (P)B+ Rating on New $105MM Loan
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary 'B+' issue-level rating
to the company's proposed $105 million senior secured first-lien
term loan due 2026. S&P's preliminary recovery rating on the term
loan is '2', which indicates its expectation for substantial
recovery (70% to 90%, rounded estimate: 75%) in the event of
default.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'D' corporate credit
rating on Appvion Operations Inc. Although the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court has approved the sale of the company to its lenders, the
reorganization plan confirmation hearing is scheduled for August
14, 2018. We expect the reorganization plan will be confirmed by
the court. Once the plan has been confirmed, we expect to assign
our 'B' corporate credit rating to Appvion Operations Inc.

"Our assessment of Appvion's business risk reflects its
participation in the mature carbonless market, which is facing
structural decline in demand; the company's small size, relative to
peers; its customer concentration, lack of vertical integration,
and below average profitability."


ARC LIMITED: June 26 Plan Confirmation Hearing Set
--------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
has conditionally approved the disclosure statement explaining Arc,
Limited's small business plan of reorganization.

June 26, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., is the date and time fixed for final
hearing on the disclosure statement and confirmation of the plan.

The Debtor has $7,666.44 in priority tax claims.  Tax claims in
excess of $770 will be paid in full with interest at 4% in sixty
equal monthly payments beginning on the plan distribution date
("PDD").  Tax claims of $770 or less shall be paid in full with
interest at 4% in twelve equal months payments starting on the
PDD.

Class 3 general unsecured claims total $492,678 and will be paid 5%
on the PDD in full satisfaction of such claims.

The source of the funds for the plan payments is the current bank
deposits and future earnings.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb17-22507-93.pdf

Arc, Limited, a C corporation that's into manufacturing of exterior
building panels and terra cotta fixtures, filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-22507).  Gary W.
Short, Esq., in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, serves as counsel to the
Debtor.  An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet
been appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


ARLINGTON COMPANY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of The Arlington Company of Sarasota, Inc. as
of June 20, according to a court docket.

              About The Arlington Company of Sarasota

The Arlington Company of Sarasota, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-04164) on May 21, 2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than
$500,000.  The Debtor tapped Melody Genson, Esq., as its legal
counsel.


AUTO STRAP: Seeks Authority on Continued Cash Collateral Use
------------------------------------------------------------
Auto Strap Transport, LLC, requests the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Central District of California to authorize its continued use
of cash collateral in order to operate.

Because of the continued downsizing and fluctuations in Debtor's
day-to-day business at this time, the Debtor does not have a Budget
ready, but will submit one prior to the hearing on the Cash
Collateral Motion which is scheduled to take place on June 26, 2018
at 2:00 p.m.

Nations Fund I, LLC, by virtue of its properly perfected, senior
priority security interest in all of Debtor's assets, is the senior
secured creditor of the Debtor having an interest in cash
collateral. The amount currently owed to Nations Fund exceeds $10
million.

The Court has previously approved a stipulation between Debtor and
Nations Fund allowing the use of cash collateral until May 31,
2018. On January 12, 2018, the use of cash collateral as to all
secured creditors was extended to May 31, 2018. On May 30, 2018,
another stipulation with Nations Fund was approved extending
Debtor's use of its cash collateral through the earlier of the
occurrence of certain events or July 31, 2018.

The Debtor has been exploring all options to exit from Chapter 11,
including the sale of all of its assets. Toward this end, the
Debtor is currently in discussions with Nations Fund regarding a
possible asset purchase transaction premised on a credit bid with
some cash component by Nations Fund.

In the meantime, however, the Debtor needs to continue operating in
order to maintain its going concern value. While the Debtor does
not believe that any secured creditor other than Nations Fund is
affected by the continued use of cash collateral, the Debtor
requests that the Court extend its order entered January 12, 2018
to allow the continued use of cash collateral as to all other
junior creditors who may have security interests in cash collateral
under the same terms and conditions as the January 12 Order.

While the Debtor has incurred post-petition financing, the Debtor
asserts that it must use cash collateral as well. The Debtor
represents that Nations Fund has already agreed that it will be
allowed to use cash collateral through the earlier of: (a) July 31,
2018; (b) consummation of a sale of substantially all of Debtor's
assets; or (c) until plan confirmation.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-19936-302.pdf

                   About Auto Strap Transport

Auto Strap Transport L.L.C. -- http://autostraptransport.com/-- is
a privately owned auto transport carrier company with its corporate
office in Fontana, California, and additional terminals in
Milipitas, and Benecia, California, and La Vergne, Tennessee.

Auto Strap Transport filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 17-19936) on Dec. 1, 2017.  In the petition signed by
Richard Rudder, managing member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in total assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Mark D. Houle.  The
Debtor is represented by Todd L Turoci, Esq., at the The Turoci
Firm.  


AVERY LAND: Amends Plan to Update Assets, Liabilities
-----------------------------------------------------
Avery Land Group, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada a disclosure statement prepared in connection
with the Second Amended Plan of Reorganization to, among other
things, amend information regarding its assets and liabilities.

The Debtor's principal assets are: (a) 10 parcels of land in Mohave
County, with a current value of approximately $19,645,445.00,
received pursuant to a settlement between the Debtor and its
affiliate account debtors that was approved by Court Order entered
on May 25, 2018; (b) 24 parcels of land in Mohave County, with a
current value of $5,509,723; and (c) six parcels of land in Mohave
County with a current value of between $10,774,140.00 and
$12,152,400.00, received by Debtor under the First Amended Plan of
Reorganization Dated January 12, 2018 of Debtor’s affiliate,
Yucca Land Company, LLC.

The Debtor's total liabilities were $12,836,669.62 as of the
Petition Date consisting of: (1) $8,131,442.19 - secured claims;
(2)$10,506.80 - priority claims; and (3) $4,694,720.63 - unsecured
claims.

In this version of the Plan, the Debtor removed Class 2(1) - 101
Pipe Secured Claim.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated June 13, 2018,
is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb16-14995-590.pdf

                      About Avery Land Group

Avery Land Group, LLC, has been in business since 2013 in the
development of agricultural land and planned residential
communities.

Kingman Farms parent company Avery Land Group, LLC, based in Las
Vegas, NV, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
16-14995) on Sept. 9, 2016.  In the petition signed by Manager
James M. Rhodes, the Debtor estimated assets at $500,000 to $1
million and liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.  

The Hon. August B. Landis is the case judge.  

The Debtor tapped Brett A. Axelrod, Esq., at Fox Rothschild, LLP,
as bankruptcy counsel, and The Bach Law Firm, LLC, as conflicts
counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


BCML HOLDINGS: Bid for Default Final Judgment vs US Bank Tossed
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the adversary proceeding captioned BCML HOLDING LLC, Plaintiff,
v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant, Adv. Proc. No.
18-01129-EPK (Bankr. S.D.F Fla.), Bankruptcy Judge Erik P. Kimball
entered an order denying plaintiff BCML Holding, LLC's motion for
entry of default final judgment.

Plaintiff BCML, the debtor-in-possession in this chapter 11 case,
seeks a ruling that the secured claim held by the defendant U.S.
Bank National Association should not include amounts due under a
promissory note that accrued more than five years prior to the
filing of this bankruptcy case. Specifically, the plaintiff seeks
an order allowing the defendant's secured claim in the amount of
$990,753.34, a sum that includes principal and unpaid interest that
accrued only during the five year period prior to the petition
date.

The complaint and summons were properly served on the defendant.
The defendant failed to respond to the complaint and, after
appropriate request by the plaintiff, the clerk entered a default.
The plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment, which is now
before the Court.

In light of the fact that the defendant was properly served and
failed to respond, and in light of the fact that the plaintiff has
complied with the applicable provisions of the Fed. R. Bankr. P.,
the motion for default judgment is procedurally proper. However,
even where a defendant has failed to respond to a complaint in a
timely manner, the plaintiff is not entitled to a default judgment
if the relief requested in the complaint is not supported by the
law. It is the Court's view that the plaintiff is not entitled to
the relief requested in the complaint as a matter of law, and so
the motion for default judgment will be denied.

The defendant's secured claim in this case is not limited by the
due date of any component of its accelerated mortgage loan debt.
Put another way, the Court rules that the Florida statute of
limitations does not cause the Court to reduce the defendant's
secured claim in this case by subtracting amounts that were
contractually due, absent acceleration, more than five years prior
to commencement of this bankruptcy case. Because there is no legal
basis for entry of judgment consistent with the complaint in this
case, the plaintiff's motion for default judgment is denied.

The bankruptcy case is in re: BCML HOLDING LLC, Chapter 11, Debtor,
Case No. 18-11600-EPK (Bankr. S.D. Fla.).

A copy of the Court's Order dated May 24, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2tebuoi from Leagle.com.

BCML Holding LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Nathan G. Mancuso.

U.S. Bank National Association, Defendant, pro se.

                        About BCML Holding

BCML Holding LLC owns in fee simple five condominium units in Miami
and Aventura, Florida, with an aggregate appraisal value of $3.38
million.  BCML Holding sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-11600) on Feb. 12,
2018.  In the petition signed by Erik Wesoloski, Esq., attorney in
fact, the Debtor disclosed $3.38 million in assets and $3.61
million in liabilities.  Judge Erik P. Kimball presides over the
case.  Mancuso Law, P.A., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  No
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case.


BKH ACQUISITION: S&P Raises CCR to to 'CCC+', Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit rating on Puerto
Rico-based BKH Acquisition Corp. (BKH) to 'CCC+' from 'CCC-'. The
outlook is stable.

S&P said, "Subsequently, we withdrew our corporate credit rating on
BKH Acquisition Corp. at the issuer's request because it has
refinanced its capital structure and no longer requires credit
ratings under its new credit agreements.

"At the same time, we withdrew our 'CCC-' issue-level rating on the
company's $10 million first-lien revolver due 2018 and $110.5
million first-lien term loan due 2019 and our 'C' issue-level
rating on its $64.3 million pay-in-kind (PIK) second-lien term loan
because they have been repaid.

The upgrade reflects the company's improved liquidity after
addressing the near-term maturities of its entire capital
structure. The refinancing transaction has altered our prior view
that the company would be unable to refinance its entire capital
structure ahead of its maturities because it continues to face very
challenging economic conditions in Puerto Rico, which were worsened
by the arrival of Hurricane Maria late in 2017.

The stable outlook on BKH at the time of the withdrawal reflected
our expectation that the company would maintain sufficient
liquidity to meet its obligations during the next 12 months under
its new capital structure. It also reflected our belief that it
would maintain an adequate and sufficient cushion under its
financial covenants over the next 12 months. We are no longer
maintaining surveillance on the company following the repayment of
its rated debt.


BLUE CHIP VENTURES: Confirmation Hearing Set for July 19
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York is
set to hold a hearing on July 19, at 10:00 a.m., to consider
confirmation of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Blue Chip
Ventures, LLC and Red Chip Ventures, Inc.

Objections to confirmation of the plan are due by July 12.

Under the plan, general unsecured creditors of Blue Chip Ventures,
LLC and Red Chip Ventures, Inc. will be paid 100% of the allowed
amount of their claims.

Creditors of Blue Chip which hold Class 4 general unsecured claims
in the total amount of $660,000 will receive payment in full in
cash, plus interest, after Class 1 secured claims and Class 3
priority claims are paid.

Meanwhile, general unsecured creditors of Red Chip, which hold
claims in the total amount of $64,000, will be paid in full in
cash, plus interest, after payment of Class 2 secured claims and
Class 3 priority claims.

The companies will sell their property on the effective date to
fund the plan.  Blue Chip will get 71% while Red Chip will get 29%
of the proceeds of the sale of the property net of costs of sale,
according to the revised disclosure statement explaining the plan.

A copy of the revised disclosure statement is available for free
at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-12686-69.pdf

                   About Blue Chip Ventures

Blue Chip Ventures LLC listed its business as a single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)), whose principal
place of business is located at 578 Driggs Avenue, Brooklyn, New
York.

Blue Chip Ventures sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-12686) on Sept. 25,
2017.  In the petition signed by Melvin Caro, managing member, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge Sean H. Lane presides
over the case.  Isaac Nutovic, Esq., at Nutovic & Associates, is
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


BLUE DOG AT 399: Taps Otterbourg P.C. as New Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Blue Dog at 399 Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York to hire Otterbourg P.C. as
its new legal counsel.

Otterbourg will replace Wollmuth Maher & Deutsch LLP, the firm that
has represented the Debtor in its Chapter 11 case since 2015.

Otterbourg will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in connection with any
potential sale of its assets; negotiate with creditors; assist the
Debtor in getting approval for bankruptcy financing; and provide
other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates range from $600 to $1,175 for partner and
counsel, and $295 to $750 for associates.  Paraprofessionals charge
$285 per hour.

Melanie Cyganowski, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the
case, will charge $1,175 per hour.

Ms. Cyganowski disclosed in a court filing that her firm does not
hold any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Melanie L. Cyganowski, Esq.
     Otterbourg P.C.
     230 Park Avenue
     New York, NY 10169
     Telephone: (212) 661-9100 / (212) 905-3677
     Facsimile: (212) 682-6104
     Email: mcyganowski@otterbourg.com

                       About Blue Dog at 399

Blue Dog at 399 Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Case No. 15-10694) on March 24, 2015.  In the petition signed by
Elizabeth Slavutsky, sole director and shareholder, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  The
Hon. Michael E. Wiles presides over the case.  Menachem J. Kastner,
Esq., and Frederick E. Schmidt, Jr., Esq., at Cozen O'Connor, PC,
serve as the Debtor's counsel.


BLUE RACER: Moody's Hikes $850MM Notes to B2 & Rates New Notes B2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service upgraded Blue Racer Midstream, LLC's
(BRM) senior unsecured notes to B2 from B3 and simultaneously
assigned a B2 rating to the company's proposed $300 million senior
unsecured notes, due 2026. The company's B1 Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) and B1-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR) were affirmed.
The SGL-3 Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating was withdrawn. The
rating outlook is stable.

Net proceeds from the new notes will be used to repay borrowings
outstanding under the company's revolving credit facility and for
general corporate purposes.

"The new notes will increase BRM's gross debt by about $30 million,
but they will also provide an equal amount of cash that should
minimize the need to draw on the revolver", said Sajjad Alam,
Moody's Senior Analyst. The upgrade of the notes reflects an
increased proportion of unsecured debt in BRM's capital structure
lifting the notes rating closer to the CFR".

Issuer: Blue Racer Midstream, LLC

Ratings Assigned:

$300 million Gtd. Global Notes, Assigned B2 (LGD5)

Ratings Upgraded:

$850 million 6.125% Gtd. Global Notes, Upgraded to B2 (LGD5) from
B3 (LGD5)

Ratings Affirmed:

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B1

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B1-PD

Ratings Withdrawn:

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Withdrew SGL-3

Outlook:

Maintain Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The new notes will rank pari passu with the existing $850 million
2022 notes. The senior notes are rated B2, one notch below the B1
CFR given the significant size of BRM's priority ranking $1 billion
senior secured committed revolving credit facility. The revolver is
secured by substantially all of the assets of BRM and its current
and future material subsidiaries.

BRM's B1 CFR reflects the company's moderate financial leverage,
significant growth capital needs to support its planned expansion,
as well as its integrated midstream system in the liquids-rich
southwest Marcellus and Utica Shale plays. After sluggish volume
growth in 2016-2017, Moody's expects E&P drilling and completion
activities to accelerate in 2018, modestly lifting BRM's throughput
volumes, earnings and cash flow. In response to the sector-wide
drilling slowdown, BRM had slashed growth capital spending and
opted to reinvest conservatively in 2017. The B1 rating is
supported by BRM's long term fee-based cash flow streams backed by
a diversified group of customers, good organic growth prospects
afforded by BRM's location in the core liquids-rich parts of the
Utica and Marcellus Shales, significant initial equity funding from
its two owners -- Dominion Energy and Caiman Energy, and the
ongoing strong support from its parents that reinvested their
distributions into BRM in 2016 and 2017 to keep leverage under
control. While the company will likely spend significantly more
growth capital in 2018-19, Moody's expects leverage to increase
only modestly during this period.

Blue Racer has adequate liquidity, which is principally backed by
its large committed revolving credit facility. Pro forma for the
proposed notes, the company will have an undrawn $1 billion
revolver and roughly $30 million of cash.

The revolver matures in March 2022, and the existing $850 million
senior notes mature in November 2022. The revolving credit facility
has several financial covenants and Moody's expects the company to
maintain adequate cushion under its covenants through 2019.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation of no material
changes to BRM's leverage metrics through 2019. Ratings could be
upgraded presuming the company executes on its growth program,
EBITDA remains in excess of $200 million, debt to EBITDA approaches
4x and fee-based margins are maintained at over 80%. Ratings could
be downgraded should a sustained slowdown in Utica and Marcellus
drilling and completion activity materially reduces throughput
volume and EBITDA or should the debt to EBITDA ratio exceed 6x.

Blue Racer Midstream, LLC is a private midstream company that
provides gathering, processing, fractionation and natural gas
liquids (NGLs) transportation and marketing services to natural gas
producers in the Utica and Marcellus Shale.


BLUE RACER: S&P Rates Proposed $300MM Unsec. Notes Due 2026 'B'
---------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level rating to U.S.
midstream energy company Blue Racer Midstream LLC's and Blue Racer
Finance Corp.'s proposed $300 million senior unsecured notes due
2026. The company intends to use net proceeds of the offering to
reduce outstanding borrowings on the $1 billion revolving credit
facility and for general corporate purposes. The '5' recovery
rating on the proposed notes indicates our expectation of modest
(10% to 30%; rounded estimate: 15%) recovery in the event of a
payment default. As of March 31, 2018, Blue Racer had $1.08 billion
of reported debt.

Blue Racer is a joint venture between affiliates of Caiman Energy
II LLC and Dominion Energy Inc. that operates and develops
midstream assets in the Marcellus and Utica shale. The corporate
credit rating is 'B+' and the outlook is stable.

  Ratings List
  Blue Racer Midstream LLC
   Corporate credit rating                B+/Stable/--
  
  New Rating

  Blue Racer Midstream LLC
  Blue Racer Finance Corp.
   US$300 mil sr nts due 2026             B
    Recovery Rating                       5(15%)


BOBBY HUTCHINS: Dodds Buying Franklin Property for $1.2M
--------------------------------------------------------
Bobby W. Hutchins, Jr., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Tennessee to authorize the sale of the real
property located at 305 Morning Mist Lane, Franklin, Tennessee to
Joshua and Lauren Dodd for $1.2 million.

A hearing on the Motion is set for June 26, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is June 19, 2018.

The Debtor is indebted to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as servicer for
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for Luminent
Mortgage Trust 2007-2 at 636 Grand Regency Boulevard, Brandon,
Florida pursuant to an Adjustable Rate Note dated Dec. 6, 2006 and
a Deed of Trust securing the Note on the Property, also dated Dec.
6, 2006.  The Deed of Trust was originally issued in favor of
Homebanc Mortgage Co., but Homebanc negotiated the Note and
assigned the Deed of Trust to the Lender on Dec. 11, 2006.  On Jan.
2, 2018, the Lender filed a proof of claim in the case, which
reflects an outstanding balance on the Note of $903,387 due as of
the Petition Date.

Prior to filing his bankruptcy case, and to secure the Debtor's
ability to pay its approved counsel-of-record, the Debtor and his
non-filing spouse granted a Deed of Trust in favor of Dunham
Hildebrand, PLLC for an amount not to exceed $50,000.

On May 29, 2018, the law firm of Dunham Hildebrand submitted its
first fee application seeking approval for the Debtor to pay
$18,223 in approved fees and expenses incurred for the benefit of
the estate.  As of the date of the Motion, the full amount of the
Attorney Fee Balance remains due and owing.

The Debtor has determined in its business judgment that a sale of
the Property is in the best interest of creditors and the estate.
The offer is the highest and best offer for the Property presented
to the Debtor. Moreover, it is well in excess of the $1.1 million
value set forth by the Debtor in his schedules.

The Debtor desires to sell the Property under terms and conditions
of the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

The salient terms of the Agreement are:

     a. Purchase Price: $1.2 million, free and clear of liens,
claims, and encumbrances

     b. Earnest Money: $10,000

     c. Closing Date: June 29, 2018

     d. Brokers' Commission: The Seller's agent was retained using
nonestate funds and will not be compensated from the proceeds of
the Property's sale.  The Buyers' agent, Village Realty, will be
paid a 2% commission on the purchase price.

The Debtor asks that the Court allows the sale to be consummated
immediately pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

He further asks the authority to use the proceeds from the sale of
the Property to pay at closing (i) the lien of the Lender; (ii) the
lien of Dunham Hildebrand, (iii) any other claims that constitute
liens on the Property; (iv) allowed commissions to Brokers, and (v)
any other costs of sale to be paid by the Debtor and his non-filing
spouse pursuant to the Agreement.

The Debtor notes that the Property does not belong to him
exclusively.  It is owned as tenants-in-common by the Debtor and
his non-filing spouse, Kellie Hutchins.  Accordingly, the estate
does not own the Property.  It merely owns the Debtor's
survivorship interest in the Property.  As such, the estate is
prohibited from conveying anything other than the Debtor's
survivorship interest in the Property.  The proceeds of property
owned as tenants by the entireties retain its entireties status
even when reduced to money.

The Property is owned by the Debtor and his non-filing spouse as
tenants by the entireties.  Accordingly, he respectfully asks that
following the sale of the Property and payment of the various costs
and liens, the remaining proceeds be held in a separate bank
account, jointly held by the Debtor and his non-debtor spouse, with
a depository institution approved by the United States Trustee to
avoid any comingling with the Debtor's approved DIP bank account.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Bobby_Hutchins_84_Sales.pdf

Counsel for Debtor:

          Griffin S. Dunham, Esq.
          Henry E. Hildebrand, IV, Esq.
          DUNHAM HILDEBRAND, PLLC
          1704 Charlotte Avenue, Suite 105
          Nashville, TN 37203
          Telephoen: (615) 933-5851
          E-mail: griffin@dhnashville.com
                  ned@dhnashville.com

Bobby W. Hutchins, Jr., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D.
Tenn. Case No. 16-07751) on Nov. 14, 2017.  Griffin S Dunham, Esq.,
serves as counsel.


BURGER KING: S&P Affirms Then Withdraws 'B+' Issuer Credit Rating
-----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B+' long-term issuer credit
ratings on Restaurant Brands International Inc.'s subsidiaries
Burger King Capital Holdings LLC and Burger King Corp. S&P
subsequently withdrew the ratings because neither entity is the
issuer of any current debt.

Subsidiary Burger King Capital Holdings LLC was dissolved following
the formation of Restaurant Brands International Inc. Burger King
Corp. is a current subsidiary of the company but is not a party to
any currently outstanding issued debt. As such, S&P withdrew its
ratings on both entities.


BURLINGTON STORES: S&P Alters Outlook to Pos. & Affirms 'BB' CCR
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB' corporate credit rating on New
Jersey based-Burlington Stores Inc. and its operating subsidiary
(and borrower), Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp., and
revised its outlook to positive from stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we raised our issue-level rating on
the company's senior secured term loan due November 2024 to 'BBB-'
from 'BB+', and revised the recovery rating to '1' from '2'. The
'1' recovery rating indicates very high (90%-100%; rounded
estimate: 95%) recovery in the event of a payment default.
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp. is a subsidiary of
Burlington Stores Inc. and the term loan borrower. We also affirmed
the 'BBB-' issue-level rating on the company's $600 million
asset-based lending (ABL) revolving credit facility due August
2019. The recovery rating is '1' (90%-100%, rounded estimate:
95%)."

The outlook revision reflects increased potential for an upgrade
over the next several quarters with improvement in credit metrics
on continued benefits of the off-price business model and
merchandising initiatives. Burlington pre-paid $150 million of its
$1.1 billion term loan with revolver borrowings. S&P said, "We
expect the revolver balance to be repaid with generated cash flows
by this fiscal year end. We forecast high-single-digit to
low-double-digit percentage revenue and profit growth, which
results in adjusted debt to EBITDA of about 2.9x and FFO to debt of
about 25%."

S&P said, "The positive outlook reflects our expectation that
adjusted EBITDA margin will improve close to 18% and leverage will
decline below 3x this year on good profit growth. We expect
Burlington will continue to expand its market share given
consistent positive same-store sales and increasing store
locations. That said, we believe competition in the off-price
sector will remain fierce.

"We could raise the corporate credit rating if the company
outperformed our expectations and we believe the company would
maintain a somewhat conservative financial policy longer term. This
would include adjusted EBITDA margins expanding above 18% with
continued prospects for improvement, and adjusted debt to EBITDA is
below 3x and adjusted FFO to debt in the mid-20% area or better on
a sustained basis. This would involve continuing to optimize
locations, product mix, and driving store productivity gains ahead
of our expectations.

"We could revise the outlook to stable if performance fell below
our projections because of worse-than-expected performance such as
merchandise missteps or unsuccessful store expansions that caused a
decline in credit metrics, such that debt leverage remains above
3x."


C & J ENERGY: Summary Judgment Ruling in Favor of AEP Reversed
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma reversed the trial court's
order granting summary judgment in favor of American Energy --
Permian Basin, LLC in the case captioned AMERICAN ENERGY -- PERMIAN
BASIN, LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. ETS OILFIELD SERVICES, LP,
Defendant/Appellant, Case No. 116307 (Okla. Civ. App). The Court
remands the case to the trial court with instructions to enter
summary judgment in favor of ETS.

The present action stems from the filing of a lawsuit in the
District Court of Regan County, Texas, by Joshua McBride -- an
employee of Eagle Testing Services LP (Eagle) -- against C&J Well
Services, Inc. McBride alleges in his petition in the underlying
case that while working as "an employee for Eagle" he was "called
to a location to do repair work on a workover rig" in Texas.

Pursuant to indemnification provisions contained in an agreement
between AEP and C&J, C&J tendered defense of the Texas lawsuit to
AEP. It is undisputed AEP "accepted tender of the defense of [C&J]
in the underlying suit" pursuant to the "separate [agreement]
between AEP and [C&J] that provides the basis for AEP's duty to
indemnify and defend [C&J] in the underlying [Texas] lawsuit."

A separate agreement also exists between AEP and ETS which also
contains indemnification provisions. The evidentiary materials in
the record on appeal indicate that ETS and C&J are both contractors
for AEP. AEP's written agreements with ETS and C&J, both of which
are found in the record on appeal, each contain (in addition to
indemnification provisions and various other provisions) a
provision stating that ETS and C&J "shall be deemed to be an
independent Contractor[.]"

After accepting tender of the defense of C&J in the underlying
suit, AEP, in a May 2016 letter to ETS, made "demand . . . upon
[ETS] for defense and indemnification in connection with the claims
and allegations made against [C&J]" in the Texas lawsuit. Upon ETS
refusing to accept this demand, AEP filed the present action in the
District Court of Oklahoma County seeking a declaratory judgment on
its demand for indemnification -- which ETS describes as a demand
for "pass-through" indemnity. The parties have filed competing
motions for summary judgment.

ETS appeals from the trial court's order granting summary judgment
in favor of AEP. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the
parties intended in their written agreement for ETS to indemnify
AEP from AEP's separately contracted duty to indemnify a
third-party contractor sued by an ETS employee.

The Court concludes that although the agreement between AEP and ETS
contains general language susceptible to a broad interpretation, it
lacks the unequivocally clear language necessary under Oklahoma law
to make ETS responsible for indemnifying AEP from AEP's contractual
duty to indemnify the third-party contractor. Consequently, the
Court reverses and remands the case to the trial court.

A full-text copy of the Court's Decision dated May 24, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2JZn4hw from Leagle.com.

E. Edd Pritchett, Jr. -- EPritchett@dlb.net -- David L. Kearney,
DURBIN, LARIMORE & BIALICK, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for
Plaintiff/Appellee.

Drew A. Lagow -- drewlagow@holdenlitigation.com -- Nathaniel T.
Smith, HOLDEN & MONTEJANO, Tulsa, Oklahoma, for
Defendant/Appellant.

                      About C&J Energy

C&J Energy Services -- http://www.cjenergy.com/-- is a provider of
well construction, well completions, well support and other
complementary oilfield services to oil and gas exploration and
production companies.  As one of the largest completion and
production services companies in North America, C&J offers a full,
vertically integrated suite of services involved in the entire life
cycle of the well, including directional drilling, cementing,
hydraulic fracturing, cased-hole wireline, coiled tubing, rig
services, fluids management services and other special well site
services.  C&J operates in most of the major oil and natural gas
producing regions of the continental United States and Western
Canada.  

C&J Energy Services Ltd. and 14 of its subsidiaries each filed a
voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 16-33590) on July 20, 2016.  The Debtors'
cases are pending before Judge David R Jones.

The law firms Loeb & Loeb LLP, Kirkland & Ellis LLP serve as the
Debtors' counsel.  Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
acts as special corporate and tax counsel to the Debtors.
Investment bank Evercore is the Debtors' financial advisor and
AlixPartners is the Debtors' restructuring advisor.  Ernst & Young
Inc. is the proposed information officer for the Canadian
proceedings.  Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc. serves as the claims,
noticing and balloting agent'


CARE ONE HOME: Taps Leiderman Shelomith as Co-Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Care One Home Health, Inc. received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to hire
Leiderman Shelomith Alexander + Somodevilla, PLLC.

Leiderman will serve as co-counsel with Cohen Legal Services, P.A.,
the firm tapped by the Debtor to be its lead counsel.

The firm will charge at these hourly rates:

     Zach Shelomith               $375
     Jonathan Leiderman           $375
     Ido Alexander                $300
     Christian Somodevilla        $300
     Associates                   $250
     Paraprofessionals            $100

The firm has requested a retainer in the amount of $5,500.

Zach Shelomith, Esq., at Leiderman, disclosed in a court filing
that he and his firm neither hold nor represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor's estate.

Leiderman can be reached through:

         Zach B. Shelomith, Esq.
         Leiderman Shelomith Alexander + Somodevilla, PLLC
         2699 Stirling Road, Suite C401
         Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33312
         Telephone: (954) 920-5355  
         Facsimile: (954) 920-5371  
         E-mail: zbs@lsaslaw.com

                   About Care One Home Health

Care One Home Health, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-15256) on May 1, 2018, estimating
less than $1 million in assets and liabilities.  Rachamin Cohen,
Esq., at Cohen Legal Services, PA, serves as the Debtor's counsel.


CENTER FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP: Seeks OK on Cash Collateral Deal
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Center for Educational Leadership seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California of its
Stipulation with U.S. Foods, Inc. for use of cash collateral.

A hearing will be held on June 26, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. during which
time the Court will consider approval of the Cash Collateral
Stipulation.

Among other terms, the U.S. Foods and Center for Educational
Leadership stipulate as follows:

     (a) On April 16, 2018, US Foods notified Debtor that it is
asserting a secured claim of $36,504.34 for goods provided prior to
the filling date.

     (b) The Debtor requires use of its cash collateral to operate
and to pay reasonable ongoing expenses during the Chapter 11 case.
US Foods has agreed to consent to the use of what it claims is its
cash collateral consistent with the Stipulation.

     (c) The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral for
ordinary and necessary expenses until July 31, 2018. Use of cash
collateral may be renewed upon subsequent stipulation with US
Foods.

     (d) The Debtor will make monthly adequate protection payments
of $500 to US Foods commencing May 15, 2018 through July 15, 2018.

     (e) As further adequate protection, US Foods will receive a
replacement lien secured with lien on all post-petition accounts
receivable and all other property acquired by the Debtor, up to the
full extent of the value of its pre-petition lien. This lien will
be in addition to any other liens of US Foods against the assets
and property of the Debtor as of the Petition Date.

     (f) Any diminution in the value of the collateral over the
life of the proceeding will entitle US Foods to a super-priority
claim pursuant to Section 507(b).

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-20324-35.pdf

            About Center for Educational Leadership

Center for Educational is a non-profit organization doing business
as Inland Child and Adult Nutrition with its principal office at
711 West Foothill, Upland, California. ICAN provides nutritional
meals for at-risk youth and adult ex-offenders.  It provides theses
meals for different government institutions and for-profit
corporation.

Center for Educational Leadership sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-20324) on
Dec. 16, 2017.  Judge Wayne E. Johnson presides over the case.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$100,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

The Debtor tapped Tang & Associates as its bankruptcy counsel and
The Attorney Law Group as co-counsel with the firm.


CHAPELDALE PROPERTIES: Griffin Buying Baltimore Lot for $100K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Chapeldale Properties, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland to authorize the sale of a lot identified as
Lot 1 as shown on the plat entitled "Resubdivision Plat, Part of
Part I, Chapeldale," which plat is recorded among the Land Records
of Baltimore County at Plat Book WJR, No. 28, folio 98 and further
identified by Tax ID No. 25-00-005869, to Griffin Investments, LLC
for $100,000.

The Debtor owns various lots of Real Estate in Baltimore County,
collectively known as "Chapeldale," which properties are held for
development and sale.  Including among the lots held by the Debtor
is the Subject Property.  

The Subject Property is valued in the Tax records of Baltimore
County at $63,000.  It is subject to a lien in favor of the
Respondent Merritt Lending, LLC as well as potential tax and other
claims in favor of Baltimore County, Maryland.

Both Merritt and Baltimore County have filed proofs of claim with
respect to the Subject Property.  Merritt asserts a secured claim
in the amount of $244,895; and Baltimore County, which has filed an
"aggregate claim" covering all of the Debtor's real estate, asserts
a prepetition claim of $742.  Both claims are subject to additional
charges, interest and fees.

As set forth in a Motion for Relief from Stay and Consent Order
Modifying Stay, the Merritt Claim is also secured by a real
property owned by a related Debtor, to wit US Financial Capital,
Inc. ("USFC"), the Debtor in Case No. 18-14018 TC.  

The Debtor has received authority to employ Christopher Cooke and
Chris Cooke Sales Team for the purpose of marketing its Real
Property, including the Subject Property.  It proposes to enter
into a contract with the Purchaser.  The Sale Contract provides
that Purchaser pay the sum of $100,000 with no conditions other
than a percolation test; well drilling; the Debtor's ability to
convey good and merchantable title; and Appraisal.  There is no
financing contingency.  The Sale Contract is subject to Court
Approval by operation of the Bankruptcy Code.

The liens described above will attach to the proceeds of sale at
settlement.  The Debtor proposes to pay real estate commissions to
Christopher Cooke and The Chris Cooke Team in the amount of 5%,
pursuant to the terms of the prior Order.  In addition, to the Sale
Contract obligates the Debtor to pay one half of the transfer and
recordation taxes at the proposed closing of the sale to the
Purchaser.

The Debtor proposes to pay the net proceeds of settlement to
secured creditors at settlement.  Baltimore County, as holder of a
first priority lien, will be paid in full in the amount of its
allowed secured claim.  Merritt has agreed to accept net proceeds,
after payment of Baltimore County's secured claim, the broker
commission of 5% and the Debtor's share of tax and recordation
costs, provided that the sale price is the sum agreed to, i.e.
$100,000.  Merritt does not consent to the sale of the Subject
Property if the Debtor agrees to a reduction in purchase price
pursuant to the cash appraisal contingency addendum to the Sale
Contract.

Merritt and the Debtor expressly agree that the sale contemplated
will not operate to release Merritt's liens in the USFC case, which
liens will be retained; and that the lien release required of
Merritt at the closing of the sale to the Purchaser will constitute
only a partial release of the Subject Property with respect to the
lien instrument securing the Debtor's and USFC's indebtedness owed
to Merritt.

The Debtor believes that the proposed sale is in the best interest
of its estate, and that the Debtor is permitted to sell the Subject
Property, and is in the best interest of the Estate.

Merritt and Baltimore County have been consulted, and do not object
to the Relief sought.

The Debtor asks the Court to enter an Order authorizing it to (i)
sell the Subject Property to the Buyer, under the terms and
conditions described in the Proposed Contract of Sale, free and
clear liens, claims and encumbrances, and transferring all liens,
claims and encumbrances to the net proceeds of the sale; (ii) pay
real estate commissions and other closing costs, including payment
of Christopher Cooke and Chris Cooke Sales Team; and (iii) pay the
net proceeds to Merritt.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Chapeldale_Properties_75_Sales.pdf

                 About Chapeldale Properties

Chapeldale Properties LLC was incorporated in Maryland in 1998.
Its principal assets are located in Baltimore County.  Chapeldale
Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-26995) on Dec. 21, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Ronald Talbert, its manager, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  Judge David E. Rice presides over the
case.  The Debtor tapped the Law Offices of David W. Cohen as its
legal counsel.

Pending bankruptcy cases filed by affiliates:

    Debtor                           Petition Date      Case No.
    ------                           -------------      --------
    College Park Investments, LLC      9/22/17          17-22678
    Stein Properties, Inc.             9/22/17          17-22680
    TSC/Green Acres Road, LLC         11/28/17          17-25912
    TSC/JMJ Snowden River South, LLC  10/23/17          17-24510
    TSC/Nesters Landing, LLC          11/28/17          17-25913


CHASE MONARCH: Ct. Won't Review Ruling on Medawar Lease Agreement
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brian K. Tester of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Puerto Rico denied Debtor Chase Monarch International, Inc.'s
Motion for Reconsideration of the Opinion and Order entered by the
Court on Jan. 24, 2018.

This matter stems from the court's Opinion and Order which
determined that the lease agreement between the Debtor and Creditor
Cherif Medawar was legally binding under state law, legally
terminated on Oct. 31, 2017, and was therefore not property of the
Debtor's estate. Debtor requests a reconsideration of the Opinion
and Order and/or to alter and/or Amend Judgment and/or for relief
from a Judgment or order, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure 59(a)(2) and 60(b)(6). Debtor contends that the court
erred in its interpretation and/or determination that the notice to
cure and the termination notice were valid and complied with the
Lease Contract Agreement dated Sept. 5, 2017.

Upon review of the Debtor's arguments, the court determines that
the evaluation of the evidence demonstrates that no error was
committed. Moreover, Debtor has failed to bring new evidence before
the court. Debtor has rehashed the same arguments previously
brought before the court in its opposition and its sur-reply to the
request for order to surrender the premises. Debtor fails to
establish any of the required legal factors for reconsideration
under Rules 59 and 60. After considering the factual and legal
arguments brought forth, the court finds that Debtor's motion
neither provides the court with genuine reasons why it should
revisit the prior Opinion & Order, nor compelling facts or law in
support of reversing the prior decision. Granting a motion for
reconsideration under Rules 9023 and 9024 is generally viewed with
disfavor by the courts, and a regurgitation of the previous
arguments now being set forth by Debtor do not provide any reason
to justify relief from this court's Opinion & Order.

The Court, thus, determines that Debtor is not entitled to
reconsideration.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order and Opinion dated June 10,
2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb17-06841-11-165.pdf

          About Chase Monarch International, Inc.

Chase Monarch International, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-06841) on November 14, 2017,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The
Debtor is represented by Hector Juan Figueroa Vincenty, Esq.


CHINA FISHERY: Sets Sale Procedures for Golf Club Membership
------------------------------------------------------------
China Fishery Group Ltd. (Cayman) and affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to authorize
the sale procedures in connection with the sale of its corporate
membership at the Hong Kong Golf Club, memorialized by Certificate
No. 1024.

On Sept. 30, 2016, the Debtors filed their First Golf Club
Membership Motion, asking authority to sell a corporate membership
in the Hong Kong Golf Club.  On Nov. 15, 2016, the Court entered an
order approving the First Golf Club Membership Motion.  By the
Motion, the Debtors ask entry of an order for authority to
establish procedures for them to sell the Golf Club Memberships,
free and clear of any liens, claims, encumbrances, or other
interests, and take any and all actions that are reasonably
necessary or appropriate to consummate a Sale Transaction.

The Debtors are in the process of marketing a corporate membership
at the Hong Kong Golf Club, memorialized by Certificate No. 1024,
and may market for sale another corporate membership at the Hong
Kong Golf Club, memorialized by Certificate No. 1031, and the
proceeds arising from the sale of either Golf Club Memberships.
There are no liens, mortgages, or encumbrances on the Golf Club
Memberships.  The Debtors intend to use the Golf Club Proceeds for
payment of administrative expenses for the PAIH estate. There is a
monthly subscription fee of approximately $400 (HK$3,150)
associated with each of the Golf Club Memberships.

The Debtors have worked diligently to promote a competitive
marketing process that will maximize the value of the 1024
Membership.  To date, the Debtors contacted no fewer than five
brokers specializing in the sale and purchase of private club
memberships to identify potential buyers for the 1024 Membership.


As is customary in Hong Kong, the Debtors do not retain a broker
until the Debtors identify a buyer through the broker, at which
time the Debtors officially retain the broker pursuant to a sale
confirmation agreement between the Debtors and the broker.  With
the broker's assistance, they'll then execute a sale and purchase
agreement with the buyer.  Together, the Purchase Agreement and
Confirmation Agreement would lay out the terms of a proposed Sale
Transaction and the retention terms for the broker, including the
commission fee, which typically constitutes 1% of the gross sale
price for the Sale Transaction.

In addition, the Hong Kong Golf Club's approval is required to sell
a membership at that club, and the Hong Kong Golf Club charges a
transfer fee equal to the greater of 20% of the Purchase Price and
the transfer fee for the last consummated transaction of a golf
club membership at the Hong Kong Golf Club.

The Debtors have received indicative offers from five independent
brokers for the 1024 Membership.  Together with market information
provided by the Hong Kong Golf Club, they've determined that an
amount of not less than approximately $2 million (HK$ 17 million)
is a fair and reasonable Purchase Price for the 1024 Membership.
Since the rights and privileges conferred by the 1031 Membership at
the Hong Kong Golf Club are similar to the 1024 Membership, the
Debtors estimate that the 1031 Membership would likely yield a
similar Purchase Price.

The Debtors intend to seek the highest or otherwise best possible
offer for the Golf Club Memberships.  However, when such a bid
becomes available, they may face a limited window of time to
consummate the Sale Transaction.  To provide the flexibility needed
to maximize the value of the Golf Club Memberships, the Debtors ask
approval of the Sale Procedures to consummate a Sale Transaction.

The Debtors propose these Sale Procedures for Sale Transactions:

     a. Upon execution of the Confirmation Agreement and the
Purchase Agreement, the Debtors will file the Transaction Notice
with the Court under seal and serve a copy thereof upon all Sale
Notice Parties;

     b. The parties receiving a Transaction Notice will have 10
calendar days after the service of a Transaction Notice to file and
serve any objections to the Sale Transaction;

     c. If any material economic term of the Sale Transaction is
amended after transmittal of the Transaction Notice, but prior to
the expiration of the Notice Period, the Debtors will serve a
revised Transaction Notice on all parties that received the
Transaction Notice describing the proposed Sale Transaction, as
amended.  If a revised Transaction Notice is required, the Notice
Period will be extended for an additional seven calendar days;
     
     d. Any objections to the Sale Transaction must be filed by
4:00 p.m. (ET) on the last day of the Notice Period;

     e. If an Objection is properly filed and served: (i) the
Objection will be deemed a request for a hearing on the Sale
Transaction, and the Objection will be heard at the next scheduled
omnibus hearing in these chapter 11 cases that is at least 14
calendar days after service of the Objection (provided that the
Debtors reserve the right to seek a hearing prior to such time);
and (ii) the Sale Transaction may not proceed absent (a) written
withdrawal of the Objection or (b) entry of an order by the Court
specifically approving the Sale Transaction;

     f. If no Objection is timely filed and served, PAIH will be
deemed to be fully authorized by the Court to consummate the Sale
Transaction, and no further notice or Court approval will be
required to consummate the Sale Transaction; and

     g. The Debtors may consummate the Sale Transaction prior to
expiration of the Notice Period only if they obtain written consent
to the Sale Transaction from each party that received a Transaction
Notice.

Upon consummation of the Sale Transaction, the purchaser will take
the Golf Club Membership sold by the Debtors pursuant to the Sale
Procedures subject to the terms of the documentation executed in
connection with the Sale Transaction.  The Debtors do not believe
there are any Encumbrances on the Golf Club Memberships.  However,
to the extent any Encumbrances on the Golf Club Membership are
discovered, the party holding or claiming to hold such Encumbrances
is a Sale Notice Party under the Sale Procedures and the purchaser
will further take title to the Golf Club Membership free and clear
of liens.  All such Encumbrances, if any, will attach to the Golf
Club Proceeds with the same validity, extent, and priority as had
attached to the Golf Club Membership immediately prior to the Sale
Transaction.

A hearing on the Motion is set for June 19, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.
(ET).  The objection deadline is June 12, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

To implement the requested relief immediately, the Debtors ask a
waiver of the 14-day stay of an order authorizing the use, sale, or
lease of property under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

          About China Fishery Group Limited (Cayman)

China Fishery Group Limited (Cayman) and its affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Lead Case No. 16-11895) on June 30, 2016.

In the petition signed by CEO Ng Puay Yee, China Fishery Group
estimated its assets at $500 million to $1 billion and debt at $10
million to $50 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge James L. Garrity Jr.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP has been tapped to serve as lead
bankruptcy counsel for China Fishery and its affiliates other than
CFG Peru Investments Pte. Limited (Singapore).  Weil Gotshal
replaces Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., the law firm
initially hired by the Debtors.  The Debtors have also tapped
Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP, as conflict
counsel; Goldin Associates, LLC, as financial advisor; RSR
Consulting LLC as restructuring consultant; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as administrative agent.  Kwok Yih & Chan serves
as special counsel.

On Nov. 10, 2016, William Brandt, Jr., was appointed as Chapter 11
trustee for CFG Peru Investments Pte. Limited (Singapore), one of
the Debtors.  Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP serves as
the trustee's bankruptcy counsel; Hogan Lovells US LLP serves as
special counsel; and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, serves
as special litigation counsel.


CKSB LLC: Dhillion Buying San Bernardino Property for $2.8 Million
------------------------------------------------------------------
CKSB, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District
of California to authorize the sale of the real property located at
295 N. Waterman Avenue, San Bernardino, California, Assessor's
Parcel Number 0135-321-21-0-000, to Dhillion Investment, Inc. for
$2.8 million, subject to overbid.

The Debtor holds the Property.  It generates a monthly income of
$11,849 from its 5-year lease agreement with Envisioning Future,
Inc., and pays Habib American Bank $11,849 every month for the
mortgage on the Waterman Property.  The Debtor is current with its
mortgage with Habib Bank, and to date, has not defaulted.

The fair market value of the Waterman Property is $2.8 million.
Habib Bank holds a first priority deed of trust in the amount of
$1,616,042.  Bilquees Bano holds a disputed, partially-unsecured,
second priority judgment lien ("BB Lien" in the amount of
$2,291,072, and Celia C. Barrera holds a disputed, completely
unsecured, third priority judgment lien in the amount of $412,059.

The Debtor's managing member was unaware of the Disputed Liens
until the Property went into escrow and it appeared on a title
report.  The Disputed Liens have stalled the sale of the Property.
The Debtor's managing member reached out to both creditors and
attempted to settle the Disputed Liens in order to remove them from
the title report and allow escrow I to close, but to no avail.
Especially troubling was that the Disputed Liens appeared on the
title report for the Property, although neither of the Disputed
Liens are for judgments against the Debtor, but rather its managing
member, personally.  In the instant Bankruptcy, the Debtor intends
to clear title of the Property and allow escrow to close.

Since the Property is the Debtor's only asset, it files the sale
motion in order to allow escrow to close, deposit the sale proceeds
in a trust account, pending resolution of the Disputed Liens.

On Oct. 23, 2017, the Debtor accepted an offer to purchase the
Property to the Buyer.

The principal terms of agreement are:

     (1) The purchase price is $2.8 million.

     (2) The Property will be sold "as is, where is," with no
warranties or representations of any kind whatsoever.

     (3) The undisputed liens, if any, will be paid through
escrow.

     (4) The broker fees will be paid through escrow.

     (5) The Debtor will hold remaining sale proceeds in a trust
account pending resolution of all disputed liens, or liens and
claims that still require investigation or further proof to
establish their validity.

     (6) The Escrow is to close by June 28, 2018.

A review of the Title Report reflects 17 liens and/or interests
that have been recorded against the Property.

A copy of the Title Report attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/CKSB_LLC_66_Sales.pdf  

The proposed sale is free and clear of all liens, except as
described in the Motion.  The Debtor intends to pay the liens of
Habib American Bank in full.  It proposes that the remaining sale
proceeds be held by Debtor, pending resolution of the Disputed
Liens.

The Debtor proposes that they be authorized to pay these additional
amounts to these entities through escrow:

     (1) The Broker's commissions which total $300,000.  Satish
Khosla will receive $130,000 and the Buyer's agent will receive the
remaining $170,000.

     (2) The escrow, closing and recording costs, transfer taxes
arising out of the sale of the Property, as well as costs of any
title insurance endorsements, estimated to be not more than
$13,829.

The Debtor respectfully submits that the proposed sale is in the
best interest of the estate and its creditors because the proposed
sale will result in a net to the estate in the approximate amount
of $975,676 after the payment of all amounts required to be paid to
brokers, undisputed lienholders and closing costs in connection
with the sale of the Property.  All proceeds of the sale will go to
support the Debtor's estate.

The Debtor believes that the Court may require an opportunity for
overbidding prior to the approval of the proposed sale.  As a
result, the Debtor proposes these overbidding procedures:

     (1) The overbid must be all cash and must be at least $2.85
million ($50,000 greater than the current offer), with no
contingencies to closing whatsoever.

     (2) Any party who would like to bid on the Property during the
hearing on the Motion must contact the Debtor's counsel at least 24
hours prior to the hearing and provide evidence of financial
resources to the Debtor's reasonable satisfaction.  The Debtor's
counsel will provide an information packet to any party who would
like to bid on the Property.  Any overbidder must also 2 submit,
before the time of the hearing, a deposit for the purchase of the
Property, by cashier's check or other cash equivalent in the amount
of at least $500,000.

     (3) The overbid increments will be $25,000 after the initial
overbid.

Finally, the Debtor asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay of
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) to permit it to proceed with the close of
escrow on the sale as soon as possible.

A hearing on the Motion is set for June 21, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.

                        About CKSB, LLC

CKSB, LLC, listed its business as a Single Asset Real Estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).  The Company owns in fee
simple a real property located at 295 N. Waterman Ave San
Bernardino, CA 92408, valued by the Company at $2.80 million.

CKSB, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
18-10893) on Feb. 5, 2018.  In the petition signed by Muhammad N.
Atta, managing member, the Debtor disclosed $2.80 million in total
assets and $4.43 million in total liabilities.

The Law Offices of Sheila Esmaili is the Debtor's legal counsel.
Satish Khosla is the broker.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: Releases Final Results of Exchange Offers
-----------------------------------------------------------
Community Health Systems, Inc., announced the final results, as of
midnight, New York City time, at the end of the day on June 19,
2018, of offers by its wholly owned subsidiary, CHS/Community
Health Systems, Inc., to exchange (i) up to $1,925 million
aggregate principal amount of its new Junior-Priority Secured Notes
due 2023 in exchange for any and all of its $1,925 million
aggregate principal amount of outstanding 8.000% Senior Unsecured
Notes due 2019, (ii) up to $1,200 million aggregate principal
amount of its new 8.125% Junior-Priority Secured Notes due 2024 in
exchange for any and all of its $1,200 million aggregate principal
amount of outstanding 7.125% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2020 and
(iii) to the extent that less than all of the outstanding 2019
Notes and 2020 Notes are tendered in the Exchange Offers, up to an
aggregate principal amount of 2024 Notes equal to, when taken
together with the New Notes issued in exchange for the validly
tendered and accepted 2019 Notes and 2020 Notes, $3,125 million, in
exchange for its outstanding 6.875% Senior Unsecured Notes due
2022.  The maximum aggregate principal amount of New Notes issued
in the Exchange Offers will not exceed $3,125 million.

The Issuer was advised by the exchange agent for the Exchange
Offers that, as of the Expiration Date, a total of (i)
$1,770,337,000 aggregate principal amount of outstanding 2019
Notes, representing approximately 92% of the outstanding 2019
Notes, (ii) $1,078,740,000 aggregate principal amount of
outstanding 2020 Notes, representing approximately 90% of the
outstanding 2020 Notes, and (iii) $2,836,971,000 aggregate
principal amount of outstanding 2022 Notes, representing
approximately 94.5% of the outstanding 2022 Notes, were validly
tendered (and not validly withdrawn) in the Exchange Offers.
Because the aggregate principal amount of Old Notes validly
tendered as of the Expiration Date would, if accepted for exchange,
cause the Maximum Exchange Amount to be exceeded, pursuant to the
terms of the Exchange Offer, tenders of 2022 Notes will be accepted
on a pro rata basis, subject to a proration factor of approximately
13%.

All conditions to the Exchange Offers (including the condition that
at least 90% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the
2019 Notes are tendered) have been satisfied.  As such, the Issuer
expects to accept for exchange all 2019 Notes and all 2020 Notes
validly tendered (and not validly withdrawn) prior to the
Expiration Date and $368,131,000 aggregate principal amount of 2022
Notes validly tendered (and not validly withdrawn) prior to the
Expiration Date.

Holders of Old Notes who tendered prior to the Expiration Date are
eligible to receive the total consideration of (i) $1,000 principal
amount of 2023 Notes per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Notes
tendered and accepted for exchange, (ii) $1,000 principal amount of
2024 Notes per $1,000 principal amount of 2020 Notes tendered and
accepted for exchange and (iii) $750 principal amount of 2024 Notes
per $1,000 principal amount of 2022 Notes tendered and accepted for
exchange (subject to the proration described above).  Accordingly,
the Issuer expects to issue $1,770,337,000 aggregate principal
amount of 2023 Notes and $1,354,663,000 aggregate principal amount
of 2024 Notes on the settlement date for the Exchange Offers.  The
settlement date for the Exchange Offers is expected to be June 22,
2018.

Each series of New Notes will be guaranteed by the Company and
certain of its existing and future domestic subsidiaries that
guarantee the Issuer's outstanding senior secured credit
facilities, ABL facility and senior notes.  In addition, each
series of New Notes and related guarantees will be secured by (i)
second-priority liens on the collateral that secures on a
first-priority basis the Issuer's outstanding senior secured credit
facilities (subject to certain exceptions) and existing secured
notes and (ii) third-priority liens on the collateral that secures
on a first-priority basis the Issuer’s outstanding ABL facility,
in each case subject to permitted liens described in the Offering
Memorandum.

The New Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended or any state securities laws.  The New Notes may
not be offered or sold in the United States or to any U.S. persons
except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not
subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
The Exchange Offers were made, and each series of New Notes are
being offered and issued only (i) in the United States to holders
of Old Notes who the Issuer reasonably believes are "qualified
institutional buyers" (as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities
Act) and (ii) outside the United States to holders of Old Notes who
are (A) persons other than U.S. persons, within the meaning of
Regulation S under the Securities Act, and (B) "non-U.S. qualified
offerees" (as defined in the Offering Memorandum).

The complete terms and conditions of the Exchange Offers are set
forth in the Offering Memorandum and related Letter of Transmittal.
Copies of the Offering Memorandum and Letter of Transmittal may be
obtained from Global Bondholder Services Corporation, the exchange
agent and information agent for the Exchange Offers, at (866)
470-3800 (toll free) or (212) 430-3774 (collect).

                     About Community Health

Community Health -- http://www.chs.net/-- is a publicly-traded
hospital company in the United States and an operator of general
acute care hospitals and outpatient facilities in communities
across the country.  Community Health was originally founded in
1986 and was reincorporated in 1996 as a Delaware corporation.  The
Company provides healthcare services through the hospitals that it
owns and operates and affiliated businesses in non-urban and
selected urban markets throughout the United States.  As of Dec.
31, 2017, the Company owned or leased 125 hospitals included in
continuing operations, with an aggregate of 20,850 licensed beds,
comprised of 123 general acute care hospitals and two stand-alone
rehabilitation or psychiatric hospitals.  Community Health is
headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee.

Community Health reported a net loss of $2.39 billion on $15.35
billion of net operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss of $1.62 billion on $18.43 billion of net
operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March
31, 2018, Community Health had $17.31 billion in total assets,
$17.48 billion in total liabilities, $523 million in redeemable
non-controlling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries
and a total stockholders' deficit of $701 million.

                           *    *    *

In May 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating
on Community Health Systems to 'CCC-' from 'CCC+' and placed the
rating on CreditWatch with negative implications.  The CreditWatch
negative status reflects the possible distressed exchange of the
unsecured notes due in 2022.

Also in May 2018, Fitch Ratings downgraded Community Health
Systems' (CHS) Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'C' from 'CCC'
following the company's announcement of an offer to exchange three
series of senior unsecured notes due 2019, 2020 and 2022.


CONIFER VETERINARY: Falck Trust Seeks Appointment of Ch. 11 Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kelly Falck, James and Linda Falck, James E. and Linda L. Falck
Revocable Trust ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Colorado to direct the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in the
Chapter 11 cases of Conifer Veterinary Hospital, Inc., and David
Lorne Palmini in order to control spending and liquidate the
practice at a market rate.

Contemporaneously with the filing of the Motion for the Appointment
of Chapter 11 Trustee's, the Movants have also filed an alternative
Motion and Brief in support of the conversion of the cases to
Chapter 7 and/or for Dismissal.

The Movants allege at least four basis to dismiss or convert the
case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 1112(b)(4) including
subparagraphs (A); (B); (I); and (J).  They are as follows:

   (A) substantial or continuing loss to or diminution of the
estate and the absence of a reasonable likelihood of
rehabilitation;

   (B) gross mismanagement of the estate;

(I) failure timely to pay taxes owed after the date of the order
for relief or to file tax returns due after the date of the order
for relief;

(J) failure to file a disclosure statement, or to file or confirm
a plan, within the time fixed by this title or by order of the
court.

The Movants also allege "cause" for the appointment of Chapter 11
Trustee's pursuant to Section 1104(a)(1) based upon either the
incompetence or gross mismanagement of the affairs of the Debtors
by current management.  Even if the Court determines that no cause
exist to appoint a Trustee pursuant to Section 1104(a)(1), the
Movants ask that the Court appoint Chapter 11 Trustee's in both
cases pursuant to Section 1104(a)(2).

The Movants are represented by:

     Arthur Lindquist-Kleissler, Esq.
     LINDQUIST-KLEISSLER & COMPANY, LLC
     950 S. Cherry Street, Suite 418
     Denver, CO 80246
     Tel: (303) 691-9774
     Fax: 1-303-200-8994
     E-mail: arthuralklaw@gmail.com  

              About Conifer Veterinary Hospital

Privately-held Conifer Veterinary Hospital Inc. owns an animal
hospital at 10903 U.S. Highway 285, Conifer, Colorado.

Conifer Veterinary Hospital Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-17810) on Aug.
22, 2017.  In the petition signed by David Palmini, president, the
Debtor disclosed $1.41 million in assets and $904,805 in
liabilities.  Judge Michael E. Romero presides over the case.
Buechler & Garber LLC is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


CPI CARD: David Rowntree Quits as Director
------------------------------------------
David Rowntree had submitted his resignation from the Board of
Directors of CPI Card Group Inc. to the chairman of the Board,
effective as of June 15, 2018.  Mr. Rowntree's decision was not
related to any disagreement with the Company on any matter relating
to its operations, policies or practices, according to a Form 8-K
report filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 20, 2018.

                         About CPI Card

CPI Card Group -- http://www.cpicardgroup.com/-- is a provider of
payment card production and related services, offering a single
source for credit, debit and prepaid debit cards including EMV
chip, personalization, instant issuance, fulfillment and mobile
payment services.  Serving the Company's customers from locations
throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, the
Company has a network of high security facilities in the United
States and Canada, each of which is certified by one or more of the
payment brands: Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover and
Interac in Canada.  The Company is headquartered in Littleton,
Colorado.

CPI Card incurred a net loss of $22.01 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to net income of $5.40 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, CPI Card had $228.90
million in total assets, $352.32 million in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $123.41 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on April 4, 2018, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded its ratings for CPI Card Group Inc., including the
company's Corporate Family Rating (to Caa1, from B3) and
Probability of Default Rating (to Caa1-PD, from B3-PD).  Moody's
said the downgrades broadly reflect continued uncertainty about
whether CPI can return to revenue and profit growth over the next
12 to 18 months, and an earnings and cash flow profile that can
adequately support the company's heavy debt burden.

In March 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Littleton, Colo.-based CPI Card Group Inc. to 'CCC+' from
'B-'.  "The downgrade reflects our view that CPI's capital
structure is unsustainable at current levels of EBITDA.  However,
we do not anticipate a default scenario over the next 12 months
given that we believe liquidity availability will be sufficient to
absorb the expected negative discretionary cash flow.


DEBORAH & DANIELLE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on June 27
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for
Deborah & Danielle Inc. at a hearing on June 27.

The hearing will be held at 2:30 p.m., at the courtroom of Judge
Stacey Jernigan.

The court will also consider at the hearing final approval of the
company's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
May 24.

                     About Deborah & Danielle

Deborah & Danielle Inc., doing business L'Patricia, operates a
women's clothing store located at 11818 Harry Hines Blvd., Suite
216, Dallas, Texas.

Deborah & Danielle filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 18-30169) on Jan. 15, 2018.  In the petition signed by
John H. Park, president, the Debtor estimated $50,000 to $100,000
in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.

No request has been made for the appointment of a trustee or
examiner and no official committee has yet been appointed.   

Judge Stacey G. C. Jernigan presides over the case.

Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq., Sarah M. Cox, Esq. and Jeffery M. Veteto,
Esq., of Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC, serve as counsel to the
Debtor.


DENT DEPOT: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on August 1
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Dent
Depot, LLC at a hearing on August 1.

The hearing will be held at 1:30 p.m., at Room 2201.

The court will also consider at the hearing final approval of the
company's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
June 12.

The order set a July 16 deadline for creditors to file their
objections and submit ballots of acceptance or rejection of the
plan.

                     About Dent Depot LLC

Dent Depot, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-10311) on Dec. 4,
2017.  The Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  

Judge Robert L. Jones presides over the case.  The Debtor is
represented by Max R. Tarbox, Esq., at Tarbox Law, P.C.


DHANANI GROUP: S&P Assigns 'B' Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned a 'B' corporate credit rating to
Houston-based restaurant operator Dhanani Group Inc. The outlook is
stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned a 'B' issue-level rating
and '3' recovery rating to the company's new $460 million credit
facility, consisting of a $40 million revolving credit facility and
a $420 million term loan B. Our '3' recovery rating reflects our
expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 65%)
recovery in the event of a payment default.

"The rating reflects the company's participation in the intensely
competitive restaurant industry, as well as exposure to
fluctuations in commodity prices and rising labor costs. These
factors are partially offset by the company's good scale and
concept diversity--Dhanani Group Inc. operates three quick-service
restaurant brands: Burger King, Popeyes, and Le Madeleine. Dhanani
Group Inc. is well-positioned within its three restaurant systems
as the second-largest Burger King franchisee with 493 units, the
largest Popeyes franchisee with 259 units, and the largest La
Madeleine franchisee with 27 units. As part of the proposed
transaction, the company has entered into purchase agreements to
acquire a handful of Popeyes and La Madeleine restaurants.

"The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the company will
continue to open or acquire new units and moderately increase
profits over the next 12 months. We forecast that leverage will
remain in the 5x-6x range over the next 12 months, and we expect
some volatility in operating performance as the company continues
its strategy of acquiring underperforming Burger King and Popeyes
units.

"We could lower the rating if operating performance is meaningfully
below our expectation such that we expect leverage to be in mid-6x
area or higher and fixed-charge coverage to be in the mid-1x area
or below on a sustained basis. Under this scenario,
comparable-sales would decrease in the low-single digits (compared
with our expectation of a low-single digit increase), and EBITDA
margin would decline about 250 basis points. We could also lower
the rating if the company adopts a more aggressive financial
policy, resulting in sustained weaker credit metrics.

"We could raise the ratings if the company delivers meaningfully
improved credit metrics on a continued basis. This could happen if
the company achieves consistent and healthy EBITDA growth through
prudent new unit development and acquisitions, resulting in
leverage sustaining well below 5x and fixed-charge coverage in the
low-to-mid 2x area. This scenario would also require us to believe
that the company will adopt a relatively conservative financial
policy going forward, and that the possibility of a re-leveraging
event would be minimal."


DIAMOND CONTRACT: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 25
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
will consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for
Diamond Contract Flooring, LLC at a hearing on July 25.

The hearing will be held at 11:00 a.m., at Courtroom No. 1.

The court on June 7 conditionally approved the company's disclosure
statement, allowing it to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Eric Frank, set a July 23 deadline for
creditors to file their objections and a July 16 deadline to submit
ballots of acceptance or rejection of the plan.

                 About Diamond Contract Flooring

Diamond Contract Flooring, LLC, is a privately held company in
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, and has been in the business of
wholesale-floor coverings since 2000.  The company sells and
installs carpeting, tile, hardwoods and other types of flooring for
residential and commercial establishments in both Pennsylvania and
New Jersey.

Diamond Contract Flooring filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Pa. Case No. 17-16672) on Sept. 29, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Christopher Diamond, president, the Debtor disclosed $142,481 in
assets and $1.32 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Eric L. Frank presides over the case.

McDowell Posternock Apell & Detrick, P.C., serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor, and later substituted by Boyle & Valenti
Law, P.C., as bankruptcy counsel.


EARTH PRIDE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 18
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
is set to hold a hearing on July 18 to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Earth Pride Organics, LLC.

The hearing will be held at 11:00 a.m., at Courtroom No. 1.

The court had earlier approved the company's disclosure statement,
allowing it to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Eric Frank on June 7, set a July 16
deadline for creditors to file their objections and a July 6
deadline to submit ballots of acceptance or rejection of the plan.

The Debtors have obtained Plan funding from Big Shoulder Capital in
an amount anticipated to be around $1,500,000.00. This loan
agreement will allow the Debtors to satisfy the three secured loans
from Loeb, Midtown Capital Partners, LLC and Change Capital
Partners Fund, I. It is anticipated that Midtown and Change Capital
Partners will receive $1,025,000.00 from the proceeds and Loeb will
receive approximately $475,000.00.  With the rest of the Loeb
payment coming from the Debtors this will allow the rest of the
cash flow of the Debtors to be used to pay the IRS claim and the
unsecured creditors. Please note this financing is subject to
confirmation of this Plan of reorganization and will not be
enforceable, effective or funded if this Plan does not get
confirmed on the confirmation date set by the court.

A full-text copy of the Fourth Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-13816-429.pdf

                About Earth Pride Organics LLC

Earth Pride Organics, LLC -- http://earthprideorganics.com/-- is a
family-owned holding company that includes American Specialty
Foods, Lancaster Fine Foods, EPX Trucking and C.O. Nolt's Bakery
Supply.  Headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, each EPO
subsidiary shares the commonality of specialty food and creates a
vertically integrated organization. Lancaster Fine Foods, Inc. --
http://www.lancasterfinefoods.com-- manufactures and sells food,
offering barbecue sauces, mustards, salsas, marinades, hot sauces,
chutneys, cheese spreads, and other common condiments.

Earth Pride and Lancaster Fine Foods sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case Nos. 17-13816 and 17-13819) on May
31, 2017, each estimating assets and liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.  The petitions were signed by Michael S. Thompson,
their managing member.

Judge Eric L. Frank presides over the bankruptcy cases.

Paul Brinton Mashchmeyer, Esq., at MaschmeyerKaralis P.C., serves
as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


EDWARD DON: Moody's Assigns 'B2' CFR & 'B3' 1st Lien Loan Rating
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first-time ratings for Edward
Don & Company, LLC, including a B2 Corporate Family Rating (CFR)
and B2-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR). In addition, the
company's senior secured first-lien term loan B was rated B3. The
ratings outlook is stable.

"The ratings reflect Edward Don's relatively strong profitability
measures as one of the leading US foodservice suppliers and
equipment distributors, coupled with a comparatively moderately
levered balance sheet," according to Brian Silver, Moody's Vice
President and lead analyst for the company. "However, the company
is modestly sized and we expect an acquisitive growth strategy to
be employed over time, encompassing potentially more aggressive
financial risk tolerance in conjunction with its private equity
sponsor ownership," added Silver.

The following ratings for Edward Don & Company, LLC have been
assigned:

Corporate Family Rating, B2

Probability of Default Rating, B2-PD

$210 million Gtd Senior Secured First-Lien Term Loan B due 2025,
B3 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, assigned stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Edward Don & Company, LLC's credit profile is constrained by its
relatively small size, with pro forma annual revenue of just under
$1 billion. It also maintains a moderately elevated financial
leverage profile approximating 5.0 times on a Moody's-adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA basis for the twelve-month period ended April 30,
2018 and pro forma for the company's new capital structure and
recent acquisitions. The company also has a heightened acquisition
appetite of late owing in part to its private equity majority
ownership, and Moody's expectation that it will remain acquisitive.
In addition, there is execution risk associated with planned
initiatives aimed at garnering incremental synergies from recent
acquisitions.

However, the company's credit profile is supported by its solid
market position and well-established track record in the US
foodservice supplies and equipment distribution business, and its
relatively high EBITA margins for the industry. The company also
has a largely recurring revenue base, and well diversified customer
and supplier bases with a good e-commerce presence for its
customers. Also, Moody's expects the company to generate positive
free cash flow over the next 12-18 months, helped by limited
capital expenditure requirements. In addition, Edward Don is
expected to maintain a good liquidity profile supported by access
to its $100 million ABL.

The stable ratings outlook reflects Moody's view that the company
will grow its topline in the low single-digits while holding
margins relatively steady and gradually deleverage toward the
mid-to-high 4 times debt-to-EBITDA range over the next 12-18
months.

The ratings could be upgraded if the company continues to grow its
size and scale and debt-to-EBITDA is sustained below 4 times.
Alternatively, the ratings could be downgraded if debt-to-EBITDA is
sustained above 6.0 times or the company's liquidity profile
weakens as evidenced by increasing ABL reliance.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Distribution &
Supply Chain Services Industry published in June 2018.

Edward Don & Company, LLC (Edward Don), headquartered in Woodridge,
Illinois, is a distributor of supplies and equipment to foodservice
providers. In March 2017 Vestar Capital Partners acquired a
majority ownership interest in Edward Don. The company subsequently
acquired Atlanta Fixture and Sales Corp. in November 2017 and Smith
and Greene Company in January 2018. Edward Don & Company, LLC is
private and does not publicly disclose its financials. Pro forma
for the recent acquisitions and its new capital structure, Edward
Don generated revenue of about $980 million for the twelve-month
period ended April 30, 2018.


ELAN MEDICAL: Employment Practice Insurance Proceeds Cut to $10K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Elan Medical Corporation amended the disclosure statement
explaining its Chapter 11 plan to reduce the amount of proceeds of
its employment practices insurance from $21,000 to $10,000.

Jami Cox will be paid the balance of proceeds from the Debtor's
employment practices insurance (estimated at $10,000.00), with the
balance of the Allowed Class 4 to be paid as a Class 3 Claim.
Specifically, the balance of the insurance proceeds on hand will be
distributed to Jami Fox on the later of August 1, 2018 or the first
day of the month following the Confirmation Date and a pro rata
portion of $2,500.00 per month as provided for to Class 3
creditors.

Class 3 Unsecured Claims, excluding the unsecured claim of Jami
Fox, will be paid quarterly pro rata distributions, commencing the
later of August 1, 2018, or the first day of the month following
the Confirmation Date, of $7,500.00/quarter over a period of 3
years or 12 quarters.

The Reorganized Debtor will continue in operation after
Confirmation. The Debtor's President, Dr. Madeline Andrew, will
continue to manage and operate the business and will continue to
receive a salary of $120,000.00 per annum. The Debtor's
Vice-President, Dr. Paul Kivela, will continue to manage the
financial aspects of the business, and will continue to receive a
salary of $60,000.00 per annum.

The Reorganized Debtor will make the payments due under the Plan
from income generated by the Reorganized Debtor's business and
potential new value contributions made by the existing Shareholders
in the event that the Class 3 and or Class 4 Claims vote to reject
the Plan. It is estimated that Allowed Administrative and Priority
Claims will not exceed $25,000.00.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb17-22713-178.pdf

                 About Elan Medical Corporation

Elan Medical Corporation sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 17-22713) on April 24,
2017.  In the petition signed by Madeline Andrew, president, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The
Law Offices of Stuppi & Stuppi is the Debtor's legal counsel.


FILBIN LAND: Proposes to Sell Westley Property to Pay Claims
------------------------------------------------------------
Filbin Land & Cattle Co., Inc., filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization that proposes to sell a portion of its property in
Westley, California.

The restructuring plan provides for a sale of a portion of the
Westley property for a restructuring of debts encumbering it, for
payment of all other claims against the company or its property,
and for the disposition of the property.  

The proceeds of the initial sale are likely to be distributed only
to the holder of the first deed of trust and other high priority
creditors, according to the company's disclosure statement filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
California.  

Within three years after the effective date of the plan, the
reorganized company will engage in a second transaction that will
provide funds sufficient to cash out all secured debts,
administrative claims and priority taxes; and fund payment in full
or in part to general unsecured creditors.

The claims of general unsecured creditors are assigned to Class 3
under the plan.  The plan divides Class 3 claims into sub-class 3B,
which consists of claims based on Filbin's guarantees of the loans
provided by SBN V Ag I, LLC to the company's president Jeffery
Arambel; and sub-class 3A, which consists of all remaining general
unsecured claims totaling $87,756.

The plan contemplates that cash generated from a subsequent sale or
refinance will include $100,000 distributable to holders of
sub-class 3A.  If the claims based on the guarantees are satisfied,
that would provide sufficient funds to pay all general unsecured
claims in full, with interest.

The guarantees aggregate more than $13 million.  Filbin filed a
lawsuit to cancel the guarantees, believing that the obligations on
the guarantees are avoidable as "fraudulent transfers."

If the guarantees are eliminated, Filbin expects all general
unsecured creditors to be paid in full, with interest.  If the
guarantees are not eliminated, the company will sell all of the
remaining property within three years after the effective date.  In
that case, it is likely that Class 3 creditors will receive less
than 25% on their claims, according to the disclosure statement.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb18-90030-165.pdf

                 About Filbin Land & Cattle Co.

Filbin Land & Cattle Co., Inc., is a privately-held company in
Patterson, California, engaged in the cattle business.  It is a
merchant wholesaler of raw farm products.

Filbin Land & Cattle Co. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-90030) on Jan. 17,
2018.  In the petition signed by Jeffery Edward Arambel, president
and CEO, the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million
and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

Judge Ronald H. Sargis presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped St. James Law P.C. as its bankruptcy counsel.
Arch & Beam Global, LLC, is the financial advisor.


FIRST PHOENIX-WESTON: Files Plan Funded by Wanxiang Cash Infusion
-----------------------------------------------------------------
First Phoenix-Weston LLC and FPG & LCD, L.L.C., filed a joint plan
of reorganization proposing that payments to creditors will be from
the regular business income of the Reorganized Debtors and/or cash
infusion by Wanxiang America Real Estate Group, LLC, an equity
interest holder of the Debtors.

Simplicity Credit Union's Allowed Secured Claim will equal its
total Claim and be paid by Weston in equal monthly installments of
principal with fixed interest at the rate of 4% per annum,
amortized over 7 years with no pre-payment penalties.  The monthly
installments will commence on the 1st day of the first month
following the Effective Date, continuing monthly thereafter until
the full principal amount is paid. Simplicity will retain its
valid, existing Liens on its Collateral.

All-Lines Leasing's Allowed Secured Claim will equal its total
Claim, as reduced by any payments made during the Case prior to the
Effective Date, and be paid by Weston in equal monthly installments
of principal with fixed interest at the rate of 4% per annum,
amortized over 5 years with no prepayment penalties.  The monthly
installments will commence on the 1st day of the first month
following the Effective Date, continuing monthly thereafter until
the full principal amount is paid. All-Lines Leasing will retain
its valid, existing Liens on its Collateral.

Allowed General Unsecured Claims in Class 7 will receive four Cash
payments, the sum of which will equal the Creditor’s Allowed
Class 7 Claim with no interest. First Phoenix Group LLC will waive
distribution on any Claim it has against either Debtor. The first
payment to Class 7 Creditors will be made within three months of
the Effective Date; the second payment will be made within 9 months
of the Effective Date; the third will be made within 15 months of
the Effective Date, and the final payment will be made within 21
months of the Effective Date.

Class 8 Allowed Unsecured Insider Claims consist of the Allowed
Unsecured Claims of Castleberg and Anchor Management Group,
non-Debtor Insiders of the Debtors. Allowed Claims in Class 8 will
receive no payments under the Plan and these claims will be
canceled and forfeited.

The Debtors will not pay each other's Claims, and their Estates and
operations after the Effective Date will remain separated.

A full-text copy of the Plan is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/wiwb16-12820-439.pdf

                   About First Phoenix-Weston

First Phoenix-Weston, LLC, and FPG & LCD, L.L.C., were formed in
2010 to organize, develop, and manage an assisted living and
skilled nursing care facility near three major regional hospitals
in Central Wisconsin including St. Clare's Hospital, which is just
a block away.  The Facility combines an assisted living facility
together with a skilled nursing facility in a resort-like
atmosphere for its patients. The business is commonly known as the
"Stoney River" assisted living and rehab.  The Facility is
comprised of two integrated businesses: a 35-unit skilled nursing
rehabilitation center (commonly referred to as the skilled nursing
facility, or "SNF"), and a 60- unit assisted living facility (the
"ALF").

First Phoenix-Weston, LLC, and FPG & LCD, L.L.C., filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. W.D. Wisc. Case Nos. 16-12820 and
16-12821) on Aug. 15, 2016. The petitions were signed by Philip
Castleberg, as part-owner.  The Debtors estimate assets and
liabilities in the range of $10 million to $50 million.  Michael
Best & Friedrich LLP serves as counsel to the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee informs the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Wisconsin that a committee of unsecured creditors has
not been appointed in the Chapter 11 case of First Phoenix-Weston,
LLC, and FPG & LCD, L.L.C., due to insufficient response to the
U.S. Trustee communication/contact for service on the committee.


FORD STEEL: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on August 28
----------------------------------------------------------
Ford Steel, LLC is now a step closer to emerging from Chapter 11
protection after a bankruptcy judge approved the outline of its
plan of reorganization.

Judge Eduardo Rodriguez of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas on June 15 gave the thumbs-up to the
disclosure statement after finding that it contains "adequate
information."

A court hearing to consider confirmation of the plan is scheduled
for August 28, at 10:00 a.m.  The hearing will take place at
Courtroom 401.

Ford Steel's latest restructuring plan contains revisions to the
provisions governing the treatment of Bank & Trust of Bryan/College
Station and Equitable Life and Casualty Insurance Company.

Under the latest plan, Bank & Trust, which holds the Class 4C
secured claim, will continue to receive payment in the sum of
$10,000 through the effective date of the plan from Ford Steel.  

On the 15th day of the first full month following the effective
date, the reorganized company will begin making payments to the
bank in the amount of $8,270.44 for 10 years or until the company's
real property upon which Bank & Trust retains a second lien is sold
or refinanced at which time its claim will be paid in full and its
liens against the property will be released.

If Ford Steel's real property fails to sell or be refinanced within
one year from the date of confirmation, the plan's injunction will
be lifted to allow foreclosure on Ford Steel's real property in
accordance with Texas laws.

Meanwhile, Equitable Life's Class 4E secured claim of
$2,664,169.126 will be paid in equal monthly payments of
$24,306.81, with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum until it
becomes due and payable in full upon the earlier of (i) a sale or
refinance of Ford Steel's real property that results in the
irrevocable payment in full of the Class 4E claim, or (ii) 12
months after the effective date of the plan.

During the pendency of Ford Steel's case, Equitable Life has
received monthly payments of $28,000 by the 25th day of each month.
Equitable Life will continue to receive a monthly payment of
$28,000 through the effective date.  

On the 15th day of the first full month following the effective
date, the reorganized company will begin making monthly payments to
Equitable Life in the amount of $24,306.81.  These payments will
continue monthly until the earlier of (i) a sale or refinance of
the property that results in the irrevocable payment in full of the
Class 4E secured claim, or (ii) 12 months after the effective
date.

Equitable Life will be irrevocably paid in full from any sale or
refinance of the property.  Its liens against the property will be
released only upon the irrevocable payment in full of the Class 4E
secured claim.  Equitable Life will retain its liens on the
property until its Class 4E secured claim is paid in full,
according to Ford Steel's third amended disclosure statement.

Copies of the third amended disclosure statement and plan of
reorganization are available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35027-115.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35027-116.pdf

Copies of the second amended disclosure statement and plan of
reorganization are available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35027-101.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35027-102.pdf

                       About Ford Steel LLC

Ford Steel LLC -- http://www.fordsteelllc.com-- is an AISC
certified steel fabricator using state of the art CNC machinery.
The Company fabricates platforms, skids, ladders, communication and
broadcast towers, custom fabrications & more.  Its office and plant
are conveniently located only 30 miles north of Houston and the
Port of Houston, allowing not only nationwide delivery but
worldwide as well.

On Aug. 24, 2006, H.C. Jeffries Tower Company, Inc., established in
1979, purchased a fabrication plant, which is now Ford Steel, LLC,
a part of the H.C. Jeffries Tower Company Group.  Since the
purchase, the 55,000 square foot facility has grown to 100,000
square feet with over 60 employees.  Ford Steel, LLC has an
extensive clientele list including ExxonMobil, Optimized Process
Designs, LyondellBasell, Integrated Flow Solutions and Alimak Hek,
to name a few.

Herbert C. Jeffries owns 86% of Ford and Steve Bales owns the
remaining 14% of that company.

Ford Steel, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 17-35028) on Aug. 21, 2017.  The petition was signed by Herbert
C. Jeffries, managing member.  The case is assigned to Judge Karen
K. Brown.  The Debtor is represented by Julie Mitchell Koenig,
Esq., at Cooper & Scully, PC.  At the time of filing, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.


FRASER'S BOILER: First Amended Disclosure Statement Filed
---------------------------------------------------------
Fraser's Boiler Service, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Washington its latest disclosure
statement, which explains the company's Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

According to the first amended disclosure statement, creditors
holding Class 2 general unsecured claims will receive a pro rata
distribution from the unsecured creditor fund, which contains
$50,000.  

The distributions will be made promptly after the later of (i) 60
days after the effective date, or (ii) the date on which all of the
general unsecured claims filed on or before the bar date have been
allowed or disallowed, according to the disclosure statement.

A copy of the first amended disclosure statement is available for
free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb18-41245-121.pdf

                   About Fraser's Boiler Service

Headquartered in Olympia, Washington, Fraser's Boiler Service, Inc.
is a boiler, tank, and shipping container manufacturer.

The Debtor sought chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No.
18-41245) on April 9, 2018, listing its estimated assets at $10
million to $50 million and estimated liabilities at $50 million to
$100 million. The petition was signed by David J. Gordon,
president.

The Debtor tapped Darren R. Krattli, Esq., of Eisenhower Carlson
PLLC, as its legal counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on May 18, 2018.


FUNERAL SERVICES: Unsecureds to Get Nothing Under Exit Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Unsecured creditors of Funeral Services LLC will not receive
payments under the company's proposed plan to exit Chapter 11
protection.

Creditors holding general unsecured claims against the company are
classified in Class 5, and will receive a distribution of 0% of
their allowed claims.  Class 5 is impaired.

Payments under the plan will be made from Funeral Services' funds
on hand, ongoing business revenue, and a cash contribution from
Bradley Bytnar, the company's sole member.

Mr. Bytnar will make a minimum cash contribution of $5,000 of cash
or equivalents, to be paid in new value for continued ownership
interest in Funeral Services, according to the company's disclosure
statement filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Washington.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb17-12710-72.pdf

                       About Funeral Services

Funeral Services LLC -- http://jernsfuneralchapel.net/-- is a
family-owned provider of funeral and cremation services based in
Bellingham, Washington.  The Debtor has served the communities of
Whatcom and Skagit Counties, along with those of Lower Mainland
British Columbia.  

Funeral Services sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 17-12710) on June 15,
2017.  Bradley Bytnar, owner and operator, signed the petition.  

The Debtor disclosed $951,812 in assets and $2.19 million in
liabilities.

Funeral Services is represented by Jacob D. DeGraaff, Esq., at
Henry DeGraaff & McCormick PS.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


GENUINE FINANCIAL: Moody's Assigns 'B3' CFR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a first-time B3 Corporate Family
Rating (CFR) and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to
Genuine Financial Holdings, LLC ("GIS"; dba "Genuine Information
Solutions LLC") in connection with the company's leveraged buyout
merger with Corporate Risk Holdings (dba "HireRight" or "CRH"). At
the same time, Moody's assigned a B2 rating to the company's
proposed $935 million first lien senior secured credit facility
($100 million revolver and $835 million term loan) and a Caa2
rating to the proposed $215 million senior secured second lien term
loan. The ratings outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the proposed credit facilities along with new and
rollover equity will be used to fund a buyout of HireRight by
financial sponsors General Atlantic and Stone Point Capital, in a
transaction valued at approximately $1.4 billion. Upon close of the
transaction, HireRight will be combined with GIS, an existing
General Atlantic portfolio company to create the largest global
player in background checks and screening solutions with
approximately $600 million in combined pro forma revenue as of
twelve months ended March 31, 2018. The proceeds will also be used
to refinance all existing debt at both companies, pre-fund one-time
CRH incentive payments and corporate staff costs, and pay
transaction fees and expenses. The combined company will enter into
a new $100 million revolving credit facility, which is expected to
be undrawn at closing. The current ratings of Corporate Risk
Holdings, LLC (including the Caa1 CFR and positive outlook) are not
affected and will be withdrawn upon closing of the transaction.

Moody's views the merger between HireRight and GIS strategically
sound as it will create a strong competitor with a sizable customer
base, wider sector diversification and improved competitive
positioning. The combined company will benefit from HireRight's
global client background screening tools, including integrations
into over 25 Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and offshoring data
validation capability to drive overall efficiencies, as well as
GIS' recent investments in research and development to enhance
product offerings. Additionally, management has identified
meaningful cost synergies that the company expects to execute
within 18 months of closing.

Moody's assigned the following ratings to Genuine Financial
Holdings, LLC:

Corporate Family Rating at B3

Probability of Default Rating at B3-PD

Proposed $100 million first lien senior secured revolving credit
facility due 2023, at B2 (LGD3)

Proposed $835 million first lien senior secured term loan due 2025,
at B2 (LGD3)

Proposed $215 million senior secured second lien term loan due
2026, at Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook at Stable

The assignment of ratings remain subject to Moody's review of the
final terms and conditions of the proposed financing and merger
transaction that is expected to close by June 2018.

RATINGS RATIONALE

Genuine Financial Holdings' B3 CFR is constrained by the company's
highly leveraged capital structure, estimated at 7.7 times
debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted and excluding future synergies for
the combined company) at March 31, 2018 and elevated integration
risk associated with the combination of two businesses, GIS and
HireRight, with potential service levels disruption or delays in
synergy realization that could temporarily increase leverage. The
rating also considers significant one-time costs to achieve
synergies for technology and system integration, employee retention
and severance that will negatively impact cash flow over the next
12-15 months. Deleveraging over the next 12-18 months is predicated
on management's ability to successfully integrate both companies
and realize large cost savings and synergies, while remaining
competitive in the market. Although leverage will be high for the
rating at the close of the transaction, Moody's estimates that the
company will be able to improve on this measure over the next 12-18
months, with debt-to-EBITDA expected to decline to around 7.0 times
by 2019. These leverage projections assume the company achieves the
majority of its cost savings (net of cost to achieve) from the
merger, while maintaining a stable topline. Expected growth rates
for the global screening and verifications market are modest, in
the low-single digits, and Moody's expects steady growth will be
driven by compliance regulations, data and security concerns, and
employers' demands for faster, more efficient recruiting.

Genuine Financial Holdings' ratings are supported by the merged
company's greater scale, geographic and industry, diversification,
as well as the combined position as the largest global provider of
background screening and verification solutions. The company's
service offerings extend to multiple regions including most major
countries. Moody's believes few other companies including Sterling
Midco Holdings, Inc. ("Sterling," B2 Stable) and STG-Fairway
Acquisitions, Inc. ("First Advantage," Caa1 Positive) have similar
geographic service offering breadth. The ratings additionally
incorporate the benefits of the combined company's diversified
customer base of blue-chip partners with no significant customer
concentration and historically high renewal rates. The company's
asset-light operating model with a highly variable cost structure
and a good EBITDA margin also provide rating support. Moody's
expects EBITDA margins to improve to mid-20% as GIS transitions to
HireRight's platform and leverages its offshore fulfillment
capabilities.

Moody's expects the company to maintain adequate liquidity over the
next 12-15 months. Sources of liquidity consist of a cash balance
of $7.5 million at close of the transaction, available funds under
the new $100 million revolving credit facility (undrawn at
closing), as well as expectations for modestly positive free cash
flow of approximately $30-40 million over the next 12-15 months.
These cash sources will provide adequate coverage of annual
mandatory term loan amortization of $8.35 million, paid quarterly.
The cash flow forecast is sensitive to the timing of outlays
related to cost saving initiatives. Liquidity also benefits from
the covenant-lite structure. The revolver is expected to have a
springing net first lien leverage ratio (to be determined) if more
than 35% of the revolver is drawn. The company is not expected to
utilize the revolver materially during the next 12-15 months and is
expected to remain well in compliance with the springing net first
lien leverage covenant.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that
management will successfully integrate both businesses, complete
client migration with limited service disruptions and achieve the
bulk of planned cost savings in a timely manner, which will be the
principal driver of anticipate deleveraging and free cash flow
growth. Moody's anticipates low-single digit revenue growth, margin
expansion, and credit metric improvement with debt-to-EBITDA
leverage (Moody's adjusted) trending to around 7.0 times by 2019.

Moody's would consider an upgrade if the company is able to
demonstrate organic growth and margin expansion including through a
successful integration of the two companies, while maintaining good
liquidity with balanced financial policies. Quantitatively, the
ratings could be upgraded if Moody's believes that the company will
maintain debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) below 6.0 times and free
cash flow-to-gross debt in the mid-single digit percentage range.

Conversely, the ratings could be downgraded if the company cannot
translate planned synergy benefits into higher EBITDA, revenue
unexpectedly declines for any reason or if the company generates
weak or negative free cash flow on sustained basis. The ratings
could also be downgraded if the company's does not reduce its high
debt-to-EBITDA (Moody's adjusted) or liquidity deteriorates.

Headquartered in Irvine, California, Genuine Financial Holdings,
LLC is the parent company of Genuine Information Solutions LLC and
HireRight. The combined company will be the largest global
provider, based on revenue, of background screening and compliance
solutions, including criminal background checks, credential
verification, employee drug testing, and fingerprint-based
screening for enterprise clients. Pro forma revenue for the
combined company is estimated at around $600 million as of twelve
months ended March 31, 2018. GIS will be majority owned by General
Atlantic and Stone Point Capital, with remaining shares held by Ray
Conrad (the founder of GIS).


GILDED AGE: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 11
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Rhode Island is set
to hold a hearing on July 11 to consider approval of the Chapter 11
plan of reorganization for Gilded Age Properties, LLC.

The court had earlier approved Gilded Age's disclosure statement,
allowing the company to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Diane Finkie on May 24, set a July 5
deadline for creditors to file their objections and a June 27
deadline to submit ballots of acceptance or rejection of the plan.

                    About Gilded Age Properties

Gilded Age Properties, LLC, owns and operates two properties: a
commercial rental property located at 117 Bellevue Avenue in
Newport, Rhode Island and a residential apartment building located
at 38-40 Freebody Street in Newport, Rhode Island.

Gilded Age Properties filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.R.I.
Case No. 17-10738) on May 4, 2017.  In the petition signed by
member Peter M. Iascone, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.  The case is
assigned to Judge Diane Finkle.  The Delaney Law Firm LLC is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  Kirby Commercial, LLC, is the
Debtor's real estate agent.


GILLETTE INVESTMENTS: Aug. 1 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brenda K. Martin of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Arizona approved the amended disclosure statement
explaining the plan of reorganization filed by Gillette
Investments, LLC.

The court determined that the amended disclosure statement contains
adequate information. August 1, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. is the hearing
to consider the confirmation of the plan.

The latest filing discloses that on or about Dec. 18, 2017, the
Debtor, Leslie Butters, and Agua Fria LLC entered into a settlement
agreement. On Dec. 22, 2017, the Debtor, Mr. Butters, and Agua Fria
filed a motion to approve settlement and the Global Settlement was
approved on Jan. 24, 2018.

The objective of the Plan is to reorganize the Debtor as a going
concern, restructure and service the secured debt and pay
non-priority unsecured claims more than what they would receive in
a Chapter 7 liquidation through the sale of its primary asset, the
Property. The sale of the Property in Gillette, Arizona will be
conducted through an Arizona licensed escrow agent. A
post-confirmation motion will be filed with the Court seeking
approval of said sale. The Escrow Agent will disburse sale proceeds
consistent with the terms of the Global Settlement Agreement and
Plan.

Class 3B consists of the Allowed Secured Claim of Agua Fria, LLC,
in the amount set forth in the Settlement Agreement approved by the
Court on Jan. 24, 2018. Agua Fria's Claim is secured by a Deed of
Trust in first position encumbering the Debtor's real property
consisting of approximately 80 acres located in Yavapai County
("Real Property").

The Allowed amount of the Secured Claim of Agua Fria will be
treated consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement which
are summarized as follows:

   * Agua Fria will have an Allowed Secured Claim paid in full
upon
the sale of the Property or within one year of the Effective Date
of the Plan, whichever occurs first.

   * Agua Fria will forbear any collection activities as to the
Property for a period of 12 months from the effective date of the
Plan. For every month during the Forbearance prior to the sale of
the Property, Debtor agrees that Agua Fria will be entitled to
increase its Allowed Claim by the amount of $2,900.

   * In the event a sale of the Property does not close escrow
within one year of the effective date of the Plan, Agua Fria will
be entitled to conduct its postponed Trustee's Sale one year after
the effective date of the Plan.

   * After the forbearance, any past present, or future
owner/partner, individual, or entity with any interest or claim of
interest in or to the Property will not directly or indirectly
take
any action to interfere with Agua Fria's conducting of its
postponed trustee's sale or any other action undertaken Agua Fria
to obtain ownership and sell the Property.

The Allowed Class 4 Claim of Leslie and Lynn Butters will also be
treated consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement which
are summarized as follows:

   * The Allowed Claim of the Butters shall be paid upon the
closing of escrow for any sale of the Property as set forth in the
afore-referenced Settlement Agreement. Butters will receive 40% of
the net proceeds of any sale of the Property in the manner set
forth in the Settlement Agreement.

   * Further, the Butters may act as a buyer's agent, or have the
option to serve as co-agent or co-broker with Pete Baldwin of
Platinum Realty as Debtor's real estate agent for the sale of the
Property provided such is not done in way that violates the terms
of the Debtor's settlement agreement with Russ Lyon approved by
the
Court on Dec. 18, 2017. Should the Butters agree to
co-agent/co-broker as stated herein, Butters will split any
listing
side real estate commission with Baldwin equally. The commissions
will be paid as set forth in the Settlement Agreement

Allowed General Unsecured Creditors in Class 5 will be paid the
amount of their Allowed Unsecured Claims upon the sale of the Real
Property or within a year of the Effective Date, whichever occurs
first.

The Debtor will conduct and close any sale of the Real Property
through an Arizona licensed Escrow Agency Office. The disbursement
of any proceeds from the sale of the Real Property pursuant to the
Settlement Agreement and this Plan, including disbursements to
Classes 1, 2, 3, 4, the Debtor, and any expenses authorized by the
Court pursuant to the companion motion to any such sale, will be
conducted by the Escrow Agency.

A full-text copy of the court order dated June 12, 2018, is
available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb14-14411-322.pdf

A full-text copy of the Latest Disclosure Statement is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb2-14-14411-312.pdf

A full-text copy of the Joint Amended Plan is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb2-14-14411-313.pdf

                 About Gillette Investments

Gillette Investments, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case No. 13-15091) on August 29, 2013, as a result of the
combination of the lack of income produced by the property,
inability to close the sale with Planet Ocean Exploration, and the
pending foreclosure sale by Agua Fria.  The bankruptcy court
dismissed the case on November 3, 2013, by request of the Debtor.

Gillette filed another Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case
No. 14-14411) on September 19, 2014.  Due to the cost of litigation
that arose in the state court action and competing claims from
Leslie Butters and Russ Lyon Sotheby's Holdings, LLC, interfering
with the Property's ability to generate income, Gillette was unable
to make any further payments to Agua Fria.  Agua Fria commenced
another trustee's sale in May 2014.


H.C. JEFFRIES TOWER: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Aug. 28
-----------------------------------------------------------------
H.C. Jeffries Tower Company, Inc., is now a step closer to emerging
from Chapter 11 protection after a bankruptcy court approved the
outline of its plan of reorganization.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas on
June 15 gave the thumbs-up to the disclosure statement after
finding that it contains "adequate information."

A court hearing to consider confirmation of the plan is scheduled
for August 28, at 10:00 a.m.  The hearing will take place at
Courtroom 401.

The latest restructuring plan proposes to pay unsecured claims in
full.  Unsecured claims against H.C. Jeffries are grouped into two
classes: Class 5, which consists of unsecured claims of less than
$1,000.01; and Class 6, which consists of unsecured claims of more
than $1,000.

Unsecured creditors holding Class 5 claims will be paid in full on
the first month of the first quarter following the effective date
of the plan.  The total amount of Class 5 claims is $1,607.43.

Meanwhile, unsecured creditors holding Class 6 claims will be paid
100% of their claims in equal quarterly installments over a
five-year period.  The anticipated quarterly installment to these
creditors, who assert $892,971.59, is in the amount of $44,649.
The first payment will be made on the 15th day of the third month
of the first quarter following the effective date.

Any member of Class 6 who agrees to reduce his claim to $1,000 may
elect to be treated in Class 5 of the plan.  The election to be
treated in Class 5 is an election to accept $1,000 in full
satisfaction of the entire claim.

H.C. Jeffries proposes the continuation of its business using the
profits to fund the plan over five to 10 years. However, the
company reserves the right to pre-pay any class on a pro-rata basis
as funds are available over the life of the plan, according to its
latest disclosure statement.

Copies of the first amended disclosure statement and plan are
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35027-113.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35027-114.pdf

                About H.C. Jeffries Tower Company

H.C. Jeffries Tower Company, Inc. -- http://www.hcjeffries.com/--
specializes in broadcast tower erection, fabrication,
manufacturing, maintenance, management, retrofitting, repair, and
can handle most any of tall tower needs. The H.C. Jeffries Tower
Company has been providing tower fabrication, erection and
maintenance for the tall tower TV, FM and other broadcast service
industries since 1979. Herbert C Jeffries owns 100% of Tower.

H.C. Jeffries Tower Company filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-35027) on Aug. 21, 2017. The petition was
signed by Herbert C. Jeffries, president.  The Debtor estimated $1
million to $10 million in assets and liabilities.  The case is
assigned to Judge Karen K. Brown.  The Debtor is represented by
Julie Mitchell Koenig, Esq., at Cooper & Scully, PC.


HARDROCK HDD: Court Withdraws J. Patrick Procedural Admissions
--------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiffs in the case captioned CHARLES D. ALLEN, III, LINDSEY
BLISS, MARK BILLETTE, ROBERT A. ANDERSON, RUSSELL PUBLOW, II,
Plaintiffs, v. HARDROCK HDD, INC., a Michigan Corporation, and
JEFFERY PATRICK, Jointly and Severally, Defendants, Case No.
16-13869 (E.D. Mich.) filed the lawsuit on Oct. 31, 2016, for
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.
section 201, et seq., and for breach of contract.

Defendants Hardrock HDD, Inc., and Hardrock's owner Jeffery Patrick
filed an answer on Jan. 11, 2017. In the year that followed,
communication between the parties deteriorated. On June 6, 2017,
the Plaintiffs attempted to serve on Patrick a comprehensive set of
requests for admissions. He never responded. A party's failure to
respond deems the request conclusively admitted. Patrick claims in
his affidavit dated Jan. 9, 2018, he never received the admission
request, nor many other attempts Plaintiff made at communication.
Patrick then filed a motion to withdraw the admissions pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(b).

The Court held a hearing on this matter on April 11, 2018. Upon
deliberation, District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds granted Patrick's
Motion to Withdraw Admissions. Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike
Defendant's Reply is dismissed as moot. The Plaintiffs' Motion for
Summary Judgment which relies in whole on Defendant's now withdrawn
admissions is denied. The Plaintiffs' motions to quash Patrick's
subpoena and to stay compliance with Patrick's subpoena are also
denied. The Court, however, granted the Plaintiffs attorney fees
for Patrick's failure to respond during discovery.

At issue in this case is Hardrock's alleged non-payment of wages,
to the Plaintiffs, for work they performed during the period from
August 1, 2016 -- Sept. 8, 2016 ("Contested Period"). According to
the Plaintiffs, who performed work during the Contested Period on
all three of the Hardrock projects, in Pontiac, Livonia, and
Pinckney in Michigan, Hardrock was required, by law and by
contract, to pay each plaintiff $54.63 per hour for "operator" work
performed, and $37.70 per hour for "labor" work performed.

The court's discretion must be exercised in light of Fed. R. Civ.
P. Rule 36(b) which states a two prong test. "A matter admitted
under this rule is conclusively established unless the court, on
motion, permits the admission to be withdrawn or amended. Subject
to Rule 16(e), the court may permit withdrawal or amendment if it
would promote the presentation of the merits of the action and if
the court is not persuaded that it would prejudice the requesting
party in maintaining or defending the action on the merits."

Patrick's procedural admissions concern factual disputes at the
heart of his answer to the Plaintiffs' claim. Plaintiffs argue
their summary judgment based exclusively on the admissions, which
contradict Patrick's position in almost all respects. In answer to
Plaintiffs' FLSA complaint, Patrick's January 2017 Answer
references the payroll advances and the DOL payments as reasons the
Plaintiffs' claims are incorrect. Similarly, Patrick has
consistently claimed that contractor Rohl Networks, LP, not
Hardrock, employed the Plaintiffs. These arguments are flatly
contradicted in the admissions. If the admissions are not
withdrawn, and Patrick is bound by them, Patrick's arguments cannot
be heard on the merits. In sum, if Patrick is not permitted to
withdraw his admissions, this case may be resolved almost entirely
on the basis of a discovery deadline, rather than on the merits.
The Sixth Circuit states in Clark v. Johnston, the "federal courts
have a strong preference for trials on the merits." Permitting
Patrick to withdraw the admissions, satisfies the first prong of
Rule 36(b) and would facilitate the presentation of the merits of
the case.

The Court's withdrawal of admissions is further supported by the
fact that Patrick found himself pro se due to outside
circumstances, at the exact moment the admissions were sent to him.
While these circumstances are not definitive, they do explain at
least in part, Patrick's failure to respond to the admissions, and
his late request to withdraw them. The second Rule 36(b) factor,
whether a withdrawal will prejudice Plaintiffs in maintaining their
action on the merits, also favors withdrawal of Patrick's
admissions. Because withdrawal of the admissions will serve the
presentation of the merits and Plaintiffs will not suffer prejudice
as contemplated by Rule 36(b), the Court grants Patrick's Motion to
Withdraw Admissions.

The Plaintiffs rely on the now withdrawn procedural admissions as
the basis for their summary judgment motion. In light of the
Court's decision to allow withdrawal of the admissions, it is clear
the Plaintiffs' summary judgment is now unsupported. Consequently,
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice
to renewal.

The Plaintiffs' filed a Motion to Strike Patrick's Reply to his
withdrawal of admissions motion. In their motion to strike, the
Plaintiff asserts Patrick raised for the first time in his reply a
"new defense and legal argument, new factual claims, and new
evidence to support his newly-raised defense and argument."
Specifically, Plaintiffs assert the affirmative-defense and
argument that the Plaintiffs (other than Mr. Billette) waived and
released their right to pursue damages pursuant to when they
accepted payments from the DOL is new.

The Court does not reach the issue of whether Patrick's reply
raises a new issue. The Court dismisses as moot, Plaintiff's motion
to strike Patrick's reply. The Court need not consider the reply in
determining to grant Patrick's withdrawal of admissions.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 24,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2t3rTfV from Leagle.com.

Charles D Allen, III, Lindsey Bliss, Mark Billette, Robert A
Anderson & Russell Publow, II, Plaintiffs, represented by Joey S.
Niskar -- joey@wrongfullydischarged.com -- The Niskar Law Firm,
PLLC.

Jeffery Patrick, Defendant, represented by Thomas R. Morris ,
Silverman & Morris, P.L.L.C. & Karin F. Avery, Silverman & Morris.

                      About Hardrock HDD

Hardrock HDD, Inc. is a privately held utility contractor based in
Jackson, Michigan.

HardRock HDD and its affiliates Patrick Leasing, L.L.C. and Patrick
Horizontal Drilling, L.L.C. (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 17-46425)
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on April 28, 2017.  The
petitions were signed by Jeffery Patrick, its authorized agent.

HardRock HDD disclosed that it had estimated assets and liabilities
of $1 million to $10 million.  Patrick Leasing had estimated assets
of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Patrick Horizontal had estimated assets of less than
$500,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Phillip J. Shefferly presides over the cases.  Thomas R.
Morris, Esq., at Silverman & Morris, P.L.L.C. is the Debtors'
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors hired Willis & Jurasek, P.C. as
its accountant; and Fordney & Coffey and Herrig & Vogt, LLP, as
special counsel.

On October 12, 2017, the Debtors filed a joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.


HARRIS FINANCIAL: Amends Plan to Increase Secured Creditor Payments
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Harris Financial, LLC, filed an amended disclosure statement
explaining its plan of reorganization to modify the treatment of
secured claims.

Secured creditor Wilmington Trust will be paid $4,595.55 every
month starting on July 1, 2018, and ending on June 30, 2048 at the
interest rate of 2.95%.  The prior plan proposed to pay Wilmington
Trust $2,663.24 each month starting on June 1, 2018, and ending on
June 30, 2021, at the interest rate of 3%.

Secured creditor Bank of 34 will be paid $66.05 every month
starting on July 1, 2018, and ending on June 30, 2021.  The prior
plan proposed to pay Bank of 34 nothing.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb18-02508-45.pdf

                   About Harris Financial LLC

Harris Financial, LLC is a privately-held company headquartered in
Gilbert, Arizona.  Its principal assets are located at 33963 Cape
Cove, Dana Point, California.  The company is a small business
Debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D).

Harris Financial sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-02508) on March 15,
2018.  Michael Harris, Jr., managing member, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $885,063 in assets
and $1.21 million in liabilities.  

Keith M. Knowlton, L.L.C. is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Will Issue $164M in Convertible Notes
----------------------------------------------------------
Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. has entered into a securities
purchase agreement with institutional investors for HMNY to issue
convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $164 million
and 20,500 shares of preferred stock.  The net proceeds from the
issuance of the Notes and the Preferred Stock will be used for
general corporate purposes.  HMNY is not obligated to register the
resale of any shares underlying the Notes with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.  Absent registration, the investors may resell
the shares underlying the Notes only pursuant to Rule 144 or
another available exemption from registration.

The Notes will be convertible, at the option of the holder, at a
conversion price of $1.00, subject to adjustment.  The Preferred
Stock is not convertible into common stock.  Each share of
Preferred Stock is entitled to 3,205 votes per share on all matters
on which holders of common stock are entitled to vote.

Pursuant to the terms of the securities purchase agreement, at the
closing of the financing, the investors will pay for the Preferred
Stock and the Notes with $20.5 million in cash up front and
investor notes in the aggregate principal amount of $139.4 million
payable to HMNY.  Each investor may prepay its Investor Note, with
the resulting cash being paid to HMNY, in its discretion.

Canaccord Genuity LLC acted as sole placement agent for the
financing.  Palladium Capital Advisors LLC acted as a financial
advisor.

Key Transaction Details

The investors may require HMNY to redeem the Notes at any time
after seven months from the issue date of the Notes, including the
portion of outstanding principal amount of the Investor Notes for
which the investors have prepaid to HMNY a corresponding amount of
cash under the Investor Notes, plus accrued unpaid interest on
those amounts and a make-whole amount of interest on those amounts
calculated through the two-year maturity date of the Notes.

The Notes are not secured by any assets of HMNY other than the
Investor Notes.  The conversion price of the Notes is subject to
adjustment in the event the Company sells shares of common stock or
common stock equivalents for less than $1.00 per share in the
future, subject to customary excluded issuances.

The investors may require HMNY to redeem the Preferred Stock at any
time at a price of $0.01 per share.  After the first 15% of the
aggregate principal amount of any Note has been paid or converted,
HMNY may redeem all or a portion the Preferred Stock held by the
holder of that Note at a price of $0.01 per share. Each holder of
the Preferred Stock will not be permitted to transfer such holder's
Preferred Stock prior to the time when at least 15% of the
aggregate principal amount of such holder's Note has been converted
or paid.

For additional information concerning the details of the financing,
please visit https://is.gd/94cCKb.

The Notes, the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
thereof and the Preferred Stock have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any applicable state
securities laws and may not be offered or sold absent such
registration or pursuant to an available exemption from such
registration requirements.

                    About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. -- http://www.hmny.com/-- is a
provider of information technology services and solutions, offering
a range of technology platforms focusing on big data, artificial
intelligence, business intelligence, social listening, and
consumer-centric technology.  HMNY owns approximately 92% of the
outstanding shares (excluding options and warrants) of MoviePass
Inc., a movie-theater subscription service.  HMNY's holdings
include RedZone Map, a safety and navigation app for iOS and
Android users, and a community-based ecosystem that features a
socially empowered safety map app that enhances mobile GPS
navigation using advanced proprietary technology.  HMNY is
headquartered in New York, NY and listed on the Nasdaq Capital
Market under the symbol HMNY.

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $150.8 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $7.38 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, the
Company had $177.1 million in total assets, $179.9 million in total
liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $2.76 million.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Rosenberg
Rich Baker Berman, P.A., in Somerset, New Jersey, on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has
suffered recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows
from operating activities.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


HENRY MELTON: Roock Buying NFL Retirement Plans
-----------------------------------------------
Henry J. Melton, II, and Scott Seidel, Trustee for the Debtor, ask
the U.S Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to
authorize the sale of NFL Retirement Plans to Catherine Roock.

Melton, with the agreement and approval of the Trustee, has
undertaken a sale process to sell the Property on behalf of the
bankruptcy estate by negotiation of a purchase agreement with the
interested Buyer.  

After the payment the proceeds from the sale will be paid to the
bankruptcy estate to partially fund the Debtor's Plan of
Liquidation filed contemporaneous with the Motion for satisfaction
of professionals and creditor claims as provided by the United
States Bankruptcy Code, all pursuant to further Application and
Order of the Court.

By the Motion, the Debtor and the Trustee respectfully ask that the
Court enters an order authorizing them to sell the Property
conditioned on the transfer of the Property to the mother of his
child, Roock, pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order
("QDRO") to be entered upon by the Debtor and Roock as a condition
to the sale of the Property.  In that regard, the Debtor and the
Trustee also ask authority to make the transfer under the QRDO
conditioned that Roock agree to the terms for the sale of the
Property under this Order.

The Debtor's financial advisors attempted to market the Property at
15% discount but there were no takers.  Thus, the price is a fair
market price.  Given all the compromises of the parties in interest
to the case as reflected in the Plan, the sale is proposed in good
faith.

Finally, given the timetable for sale, the Trustee and the Debtor
respectfully submit that cause exists for the Court to waive the
14-day stay of Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Henry_Melton_106_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Jay Ong, Esq.
          MUNSCH HARDT KNOPF & HARR P.C.
          303 Colorado Street
          Austin, TX 78701-3924
          E-mail: jong@munsch.com

Counsel for Debtor:

          Kevin S. Wiley, Sr., Esq.
          Kevin S. Wiley, Jr., Esq.
          THE WILEY LAW GROUP, PLLC
          325 N. St. Paul Street, Suite 2750
          Dallas, TX 75201
          Telephone: (469) 619-5721
          Facsimile: (469) 619-5725
          E-mail: kevinwiley@lkswjr.com

The Trustee:

          Scott Seidel, Esq.
          SEIDEL LAW FIRM
          6505 W. Park Blvd., Suite 306
          Plano, TX 75093
          E-mail: Scott.seidel@earthlink.net

Henry J. Melton sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case
No. 17-44206) on Oct. 14, 2017.  The Debtor tapped Kevin S. Wiley,
Jr., Esq., at The Wiley Law Group, PLLC as counsel.  The Court
appointed Scott Seidel as Trustee for the Debtor.


HH & JR INC: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for July 17
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida is
set to hold a hearing on July 17 to consider approval of the
disclosure statement, which explains the Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization for HH & JR Inc.

The hearing will take place at 1:30 p.m., at Courtroom A.
Objections to the disclosure statement are due by July 10.

HH & JR Inc. owns and operates a convenience and check cashing
store located at 7459 South Military Trail, Suite A, Lake Worth,
Florida 33463. The store also sells cigarettes, beverages, and
packaged goods (alcoholic beverages).

Class 3 consists of all Allowed Unsecured Claims against the
Debtor. Holders of Class 3 Claims will receive: (i) 50% of the net
proceeds of any Causes of Action after payment of all
administrative expenses and post-Effective Date professional fees
and costs; and (ii) guaranteed pro rata quarterly payments of $500
for a period of five years following the Effective Date.

Funds to be used to make payments under the Plan will be paid by
the Debtor's President and sole equity holder H. Tony Hussein. Mr.
Hussein has agreed to personally make the 20 quarterly payments to
the unsecured creditors of $500 per quarter for a total of $10,000
over 5 years, each payment to provide new value and in exchange for
the re-vesting of the shares of the company so that H. Tony Hussein
will retain his 100% pre-petition equity interest in the Debtor
post-petition. Going forward, the reorganized Debtor anticipates
improving the bottom line by reducing its debt service and
expanding its services to include sale of package goods. The most
significant savings will be the reduction (if not elimination) of
the payments to the "hard money lenders." To the extent that the
Debtor wishes to prepay any amounts due under the Plan from exempt
assets or other third party sources, the Debtor reserves the right
to do so without penalty and to seek the entry of a final decree
closing this case.

In order to assist in funding the Debtor's business operations
under the Plan, the Debtor may retain any cash on hand, any funds
in its bank accounts, and may retain amounts received from accounts
receivable to pay accounts payable. Accordingly, Debtor asserts
that it is able to perform all of its obligations under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-19473-64.pdf

                    About HH & JR, Inc.

Headquartered in Lake Worth, Florida, HH & JR Inc., dba One Stop,
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No. 17-19473) on July 27, 2017, estimating its assets and
liabilities at $100,001 and $500,000 each.  Chad T. Van Horn, Esq.,
at Van Horn Law Group, P.A.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Lakeshore Properties of HH & JR
Inc., as of Nov. 16, according to a court docket.


HITS AFRICA: Seeks U.S. Recognition of Cayman Liquidation
---------------------------------------------------------
Liquidators of Hits Africa Ltd. have filed a Chapter 15 petition to
seek U.S. recognition of the African telecommunications company's
liquidation in the Cayman Islands.

HAL is a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated on May 24,
2007 under the laws of the Cayman Islands.  Prior to its
liquidation, HAL operated in the sub-Saharan telecoms market,
predominantly in the United Republic of Tanzania, the Democratic
Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Equatorial Guinea.  HAL's
main function was that of a holding company for various telecom
subsidiaries across four countries in Africa.  HAL is 92.82% owned
by HITS Telecom Holding Company K.S.C., a telecom holding company
listed on the Kuwait Stock Exchange.

HAL's corporate structure is as follows:

   * HAL's business operations in Tanzania are conducted through
Excellentcom Tanzania Ltd. -- a joint venture in which HAL has a
56% ownership interest;

   * HAL's business operations in Republic of Congo are conducted
through SemaTel SPRL -- a joint venture in which HAL has a 65%
ownership interest;

   * HAL's business operations in Equatorial Guinea were conducted
through GreenCom (formerly Hits Equitorial Guinea) -- a joint
venture in which HAL previously held an ownership interest;

   * HAL's  business operations in Liberia are conducted through
Atlantic Wireless Company -- a joint venture in which HAL has a 55%
ownership interest;

   * HAL is the 100% owner of Hits Africa Bahrain W.L.L, a  company
formed under the laws of Bahrain which does not appear to have any
assets or operations; and

   * HAL is the 100% owner of Hits Africa Business Consultancy SPC,
a company formed under the laws of Bahrain which does not appear to
have any assets or operations.

HAL's Cayman Liquidation was the result of an involuntary  petition
for liquidation filed in the Cayman Court by Huawei Technologies
Co. Ltd., a multinational networking telecommunications, services
and consumer electronics company based in Shenzhen, in the People's
Republic of China.  Huawei is one of the largest manufacturers of
telecommunications equipment in the world.

Pursuant to an April 28, 2006 Purchase Long Form Agreement
("PLFA"), as amended, entered into between HAL and Excellentcom on
one hand, and Huawei and Huawei Technologies (Tanzania) Co., Ltd.
("Huawei Tanzania") on the other:

  (i) Huawei and Huawei Tanzania were to provide telecom equipment
and services to Excellentcom; and

(ii) HAL and ExcellentCom were to be jointly and severally
responsible in respect of all obligations including but not limited
to payments, repayments and provision of security.

On March 18, 2013, Huawei served HAL with a Statutory Demand
pursuant to the Cayman Companies Law, claiming that HAL owed the
sum of US$21,303,468 and interest of US$6,314,348 calculated up to
including the date of the Statutory Demand, being a total
indebtedness of US$27,617,816.

After HAL failed to make payment to Huawei in accordance with the
Statutory Demand, on July 16, 2013, Huawei presented a Petition for
the winding up of HAL pursuant to Section 92 of the Cayman
Companies Law, on the ground that HAL is insolvent and unable to
pay its debts, namely, HAL's debt under the PLFA.

From Nov. 28 to 29, 2013, the Cayman Court heard arguments in
connection with the Involuntary Petition from representatives for
HAL and Huawei.  On Jan. 29, 2014, the Cayman Court entered the
Liquidation Order and a Judgment providing certain findings of fact
and conclusions of law in connection with the Cayman Court's entry
of the  Liquidation Order.

The amount of claims filed against HAL in the Cayman Liquidation is
currently $195,419,017.  The Liquidators have begun the process of
adjudicating claims received in accordance with the provisions of
the Companies Winding Up Rules, 2018, and creditors will receive an
adjudication notice advising that their claim has been accepted,
partially accepted or rejected in full.

However, HAL' s primary assets are still being investigated.  At
present, the Liquidators are investigating, inter alia, potential
claims and causes of action to recover amounts due from third
parties and related parties in connection with HAL's failed
business ventures.  In particular, the Liquidators  have filed a
petition for recognition under Chapter 15, inter alia, to obtain
banking records related to HAL's business and subsidiaries, all of
which engaged in US Dollar wire transactions.  The Liquidators have
not been able to obtain important banking records of HAL and its
subsidiaries to date, obtaining these records is crucial to
understanding the causes of HAL's insolvency and asset position, as
well as to evaluate whether claims regarding transactions by former
management are accurate.

                      About Hits Africa Ltd.

Hits Africa Ltd. is a Cayman Islands exempted company incorporated
on May 24, 2007 under the laws of the Cayman Islands.  Prior to its
liquidation, HAL was engaged in business operations in the
sub-Saharan telecoms market, predominantly in the United Republic
of Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic
of Equatorial Guinea.

HAL is in liquidation in the Cayman Islands as a result of an
involuntary petition for liquidation filed in the Cayman Court,
pursuant to Section 92 of the Companies-Law, by Huawei Technologies
Co. Ltd.

On Jan. 29, 2014, the Cayman Court entered a winding up order in
which it, inter alia, ordered that HAL be wound up and liquidated
in accordance with the Companies Law and under the supervision of
the Cayman Court.  Keiran Hutchinson and Claire Loebell of EY
Cayman Ltd. were appointed as joint official liquidators of HAL.

On June 19, 2018, the liquidators of HAL filed a Chapter 15
petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-11822) to seek U.S.
recognition of the Cayman liquidation.  The Hon. Michael E. Wiles
oversees the U.S. case.  Warren E. Gluck, Esq., and Richard A.
Bixter, Jr., Esq., at HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP, in New York, serve as
U.S. counsel.


HNRC DISSOLUTION: Alliance Bid to Enforce Sale Order Nixed
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Tracey N. Wise of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Kentucky entered an order denying Alliance WOR
Properties, LLC's Motion for Enforcement of Sale Order and
Confirmation Order and also denying Illinois Methane, LLC's Motion
for Determination of Jurisdiction, to Abstain, and to Dismiss
Contested Matter.

Old Ben Coal Company and 160 affiliates filed voluntary chapter 11
petitions in November 2002. The individual bankruptcy cases were
jointly administered under the lead case styled In re Horizon
Natural Resources Company et al., Case No. 02-14261.

In 2004, Debtors sold substantially all of their assets pursuant to
a court-approved auction process. As part of this process, Old Ben
sold its interest in a coal reserve located in Hamilton County,
Illinois, to LCC Illinois, LLC (a/k/a Lexington Coal). Following
some intermediate transfers, Alliance acquired the Reserve in
September 2011.

On May 8, 2017, Methane filed suit against Alliance and others in
an Illinois state court, seeking to collect based on an interest in
the coalbed methane gas rights in the Reserve. Methane alleges that
on June 12, 1998, several years prior to the Bankruptcy, Old Ben
conveyed all of the coalbed methane gas rights in the Reserve to
Methane via deed while retaining the coal rights. According to
Methane, the Old Ben Deed provides that Old Ben will pay Methane a
"delay rental" obligation if Old Ben's coal mining activities make
the Reserve unavailable for methane gas production. Methane's
rights under the Old Ben Deed are collectively referred to herein
as its "Interest." The parties disagree as to the nature of the
Interest; however, they agree the Interest derives solely from the
Old Ben Deed. Methane seeks to enforce and collect on its Interest
through the state court litigation.

On Sept. 15, 2017, Alliance moved to reopen the Bankruptcy to allow
it to file the Enforcement Motion seeking interpretation and
enforcement of two orders: (1) Order Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. sections
105(a), 362, 363, 365, 1123, and 1146(c) and Fed. R. Bankr. P.
2002, 6004, 6006 and 9014: (A) Approving Asset Purchase Agreements,
(B) Authorizing Sale of Substantially All Assets Free and Clear of
All Liens, Claims, Interests and Other Encumbrances, and (C)
Authorizing Assumption and Assignment of Certain Agreements and (2)
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Confirming the
Debtors’ Third Amended Joint Liquidating Plan under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy was reopened on Dec. 19, 2017.

Alliance filed the Enforcement Motion on Jan. 22, 2018. Alliance
contends it acquired the Reserve free and clear of any liens,
claims, interests, or encumbrances pursuant to section 363(f)3 and
without liability for Methane's Interest. Alliance asks the Court
to enjoin Methane's claims against it because Methane's Interest
was extinguished by entry of the Sale and Confirmation Orders.
Methane opposes the requested relief and filed the Jurisdiction
Motion contending the Court lacks subject matter and personal
jurisdiction over a dispute between two non-debtor parties
involving state law property rights. However, Methane further
argues that if jurisdiction exists, the Court must abstain because
state law issues predominate. Finally, Methane contends its
Interest was not extinguished by the sale and confirmation process
because the publication notice of the Sale and Confirmation Orders
does not satisfy constitutional due process as to Methane.

A final hearing was held on March 28, 2018, and the Court finds it
has subject matter and personal jurisdiction to decide whether
Methane received notice of the Sale and Confirmation Orders
sufficient to satisfy constitutional due process and will exercise
that jurisdiction. Further, the Court finds Alliance did not meet
its burden to prove Methane was an unknown party to Debtor Old Ben
and its affiliates; and thus, publication notice of the sale and
confirmation process did not satisfy constitutional due process as
to Methane. Alliance's Enforcement Motion is denied.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
June 11, 2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/kyeb02-14261-8574.pdf

Headquartered in Ashland, Kentucky, Horizon Natural Resources
(f/k/a AEI Resources Holding, is one of the United States' largest
producers of steam (bituminous) coal.  The Company filed for
chapter 11 protection on February 28, 2002 (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case
No. 02-14261).  Ronald E Gold, Esq. represent the Debtors in their
restructuring efforts. When the Company filed for protection from
their creditors, they listed at least $100 million in total assets
and $100 million in total debts.  Horizon Natural Resources later
changed its name to HNRC Dissolution Co.


HOUSTON FOODS: Moody's Assigns B3 Corp. Family Rating
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) and B3-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to Houston
Foods, Inc., borrower and subsidiary of holding company Dhanani
Group Inc. (collectively "Dhanani Group" or "Dhanani"). Moody's
additionally assigned B2 ratings to Dhanani's proposed $40 million
senior secured revolver and $420 million senior secured term loan.
The rating outlook is stable.

Proceeds from the proposed $420 million senior secured term loan,
along with $75 million of proceeds to be received from the sale and
lease-back of 114 Popeyes properties, will be used to refinance and
consolidate the debt at the company's Burger King, Popeyes and La
Madeleine operations, repay certain existing real estate debt,
finance a portion of the acquisition of 14 Popeyes units and 7 La
Madeleine units, and pay about $9 million in related fees and
expenses. The ratings are subject to the execution of the proposed
transaction and Moody's receipt and review of final documentation.

"Dhanani's B3 CFR considers the company's high leverage as a result
of the proposed refinancing transaction, sizeable level of capex
requirements, and acquisitive nature of the company," stated Adam
McLaren, Moody's AVP-Analyst. Moody's expects leverage on a
pro-forma basis for the transaction of near 6x. However, the
ratings recognize the relative strength and scale of Burger King
and Popeyes, Dhanani's two largest concepts, as well as the
expectation that credit metrics will improve from current levels.

Assignments:

Issuer: Houston Foods, Inc.

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Houston Foods, Inc.

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 Corporate Family Rating reflects Dhanani's high leverage
level, concentration in Texas and Illinois, elevated capital
expenditure requirements to fund remodel and growth initiatives,
and acquisitive nature of the company. The rating is supported by
Dhanani's multiple brand concepts, meaningful scale in the Burger
King and Popeyes franchise system, and adequate liquidity.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that debt protection
metrics will gradually improve as new acquired and developed
locations come online and existing units are remodeled. The stable
outlook also reflects that Dhanani will continue to have adequate
liquidity.

Factors that could result in an upgrade include debt to EBITDA
under 5.5 times and EBIT coverage of interest expense of over 1.75
times, on a sustained basis. An upgrade would also require good
liquidity.

A downgrade could occur if debt to EBITDA were to increase to over
7 times. EBIT to Interest expense below 1.1x or a deterioration in
liquidity could also result in a downgrade.

Dhanani, headquartered in Sugarland, Texas, owns and operates 493
Burger King, 259 Popeyes, and 27 La Madeleine franchised
restaurants throughout the United States. The company is wholly
owned by members of the Dhanani family. Revenue is approximately
$950 million for the last twelve month period ended March 31, 2018.


HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Expands Board to 8 Members
-------------------------------------------------
The Board of Directors of Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., increased
the number of directors on the Board and appointed Bonnie Stone
Sellers as an independent director, effective June 20, 2018.  The
addition of Ms. Sellers expands Hovnanian's Board of Directors to
eight members, six of whom are independent directors.  Ms. Sellers,
who brings considerable expertise and over 35 years of global real
estate experience, will also serve on the Board of Director's Audit
Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee.

"We are pleased to welcome Bonnie to Hovnanian's Board of
Directors," stated Ara K. Hovnanian, chairman of the Board,
president and chief executive officer.  "Her extensive experience
in the global real estate market will provide valuable insight as
we execute our plan to grow our community count, revenues and
ultimately our profitability.  We believe that Bonnie's broad real
estate knowledge and sharp business acumen will further enhance the
oversight and counsel that we receive from our Board of
Directors."

Ms. Sellers most recently served as chief executive officer of
Christie's International Real Estate.  As CEO of Christie's, Ms.
Sellers was responsible for all aspects of the company's business,
including its global sales, marketing strategy, new development
projects and finance groups.  Her ability to recognize lucrative
synergies and add key affiliates, in 18 international cities in the
Americas, Europe, Asia and the Middle East, helped pave the way for
the company's growth during her tenure.  Before that, Ms. Sellers
was a partner and head of real estate at McKinsey & Company.
During her 14 years as a partner at McKinsey, Ms. Sellers was
responsible for launching and building the firm's real estate
group.  Earlier in her career, Ms. Sellers practiced law in the
real estate departments of two major New York City law firms,
representing clients on sales and acquisitions, leases,
construction agreements, joint ventures, urban renewal projects,
and financings.

Ms. Sellers holds a JD from Columbia Law School, an MLA in
landscape architecture from Harvard Graduate School of Design, and
a BA in architecture and landscape architecture from University of
Pennsylvania.  She serves on the Board of Overseers for University
of Pennsylvania School of Design, and the Dean's Campaign Committee
at Harvard Graduate School of Design.

In connection with her service as a non-employee director, Ms.
Sellers will be compensated in accordance with the Company's
standard compensation policies and practices for non-employee
directors of the Board as described in the Company's Proxy
Statement for its 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on Jan. 26, 2018.

                   About Hovnanian Enterprises

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., founded in 1959 by Kevork S. Hovnanian
and headquartered in Matawan, New Jersey, designs, constructs,
markets, and sells single-family detached homes, attached townhomes
and condominiums, urban infill, and active lifestyle homes in
planned residential developments.  The Company is a homebuilder
with operations in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Texas, Virginia, Washington, D.C. and West Virginia.  The Company's
homes are marketed and sold under the trade names K. Hovnanian
Homes, Brighton Homes and Parkwood Builders.  As the developer of
K. Hovnanian's Four Seasons communities, the Company is also one of
the nation's largest builders of active lifestyle communities.

Hovnanian Enterprises reported a net loss of $332.2 million for the
year ended Oct. 31, 2017, a net loss of $2.81 million for the year
ended Oct. 31, 2016, and a net loss of $16.10 million for the year
ended Oct. 31, 2015.  As of April 30, 2018, Hovnanian had $1.64
billion in total assets, $2.14 billion in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $499.97 million.

                          *     *     *

In February 2018, Moody's Investors Service upgraded Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc. Corporate Family Rating to "Caa1" from "Caa2" as
the company has made strides in reducing its near-to-midterm
refinancing risk and Moody's believes that Hovnanian generates
sufficient unleveraged free cash flow to cover its interest burden
in the next 12 to 18 months.

In April 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Hovnanian Enterprises to 'CC' from 'CCC+'.  The downgrade
follows Hovnanian's announcement of a proposed exchange offering
for any and all of its $440 million 10% senior secured notes and
$400 million 10.5% senior secured notes for newly issued 3% senior
notes due 2047, a proposed exchange offering that S&P views as a
distressed exchange, if completed.

In June 2018, Fitch Ratings upgraded Hovnanian Enterprises' Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) to 'CCC' from 'C'.  The rating action follows
the company's announcement that it has cured the default associated
with the non-payment of interest that was due on May 1, 2018 on $26
million of 8% notes due 2019 held by K. Hovnanian at Sunrise Trail
III, LLC and the withdrawal of the exchange offer of the 10% and
10.5% notes for new 3% unsecured notes.


JAMES CHANDLER: Carvers Buying Sunflower Property for $240K
-----------------------------------------------------------
James A. Chandler asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Mississippi to authorize the sale of the real property
described as "Residence and 119 Acres of Land - S25,T22N,R3 W,"
consisting of 60 acres, being that portion of Unit 12 and Unit 13
of the W.P. Brown-Pepple Place which lies North and East of the
drainage canal which transverses the property, Sunflower County,
Mississippi, to Garrett Carver and Hartley Carver for $240,000.

The Debtor listed on Schedule A/B the Property, assigning thereto a
current market value of $325,000.  Said real property is claimed as
exempt on Schedule C with an assigned exemption value of $75,000.
Additionally, the property is encumbered by a deed of trust in
favor of Southern Bancorp Bank in the current approximate amount of
$320,174.

A cash offer for the purchase of the Property, has been made by the
Buyers in the amount of $240,000, free and clear of liens, as more
particularly set forth in Contract for the Sale and Purchase of
Real Estate.  Per said contract, the Purchasers have agreed to be
responsible for all closing costs, with the exception of
preparation of the Warranty Deed and the sale contract.

The lien of Southern Bancorp Bank will attach to the sale proceeds
and be used for the purpose of paying the Debtor's obligation to
the Bank, which has agreed to file a partial release of its deed of
trust upon receipt of the sale proceeds.  The closing agent shall
be authorized to pay the Seller's portion of the closing costs,
including prorated taxes, and to pay the remaining balance of the
sale proceeds to Southern Bancorp Bank through its attorney, Jeff
D. Rawlings, immediately upon the entry of an order approving the
sale and execution and delivery of a Warranty Deed from seller.
Any and all unpaid and/or outstanding property and/or privilege
taxes owing and/or to be owed on the subject property, will be
prorated as of the date of closing.

Considering the current market, the Debtor's counsel is of the
opinion that the cash offer for said real property is reasonable,
is in the best interest of the bankruptcy estate and should be
accepted.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/James_Chandler_54_Sales.pdf

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Jeffrey A. Levingston, Esq.
          NORQUIST & LEVINGSTON, PLLC
          P.O. Box 1327
          Cleveland, MS 38732
          Telephone: (662) 843-2791
          E-mail: jleving@bellsouth.net

James A. Chandler sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Miss.
Case No. 18-l0973-NPO) on March 15, 2018.


LDR INDUSTRIES: District Court Junks Schagrin Lawsuit
-----------------------------------------------------
District Judge Thomas M. Durkin granted the Defendants' motion and
dismissed the case captioned ROGER B. SCHAGRIN and ROGER B.
SCHAGRIN, PC, doing business as SCHAGRIN ASSOCIATES, Plaintiffs, v.
LDR INDUSTRIES, LLC; GB HOLDINGS, INC.; LARRY GREENSPON and DENNIS
GREENSPON, Defendants, No. 14 C 9125 (N.D. Ill.).

The Defendants manufacture and import steel pipe from China.
Relators, Roger Schagrin and his law firm, allege that Defendants
misclassify the pipe in order to avoid paying certain customs
duties. The Relators claim that this works a fraud against the
federal government in violation of the False Claims Act. The
Defendants have moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim.

In a provision known as the "government action bar," the False
Claims Act provides, "In no event may a person bring an action
under [the False Claims Act] which is based upon allegations or
transactions which are the subject of a civil suit or an
administrative civil money penalty proceeding in which the
Government is already a party." Defendants argue that this case
must be dismissed because U.S. Customs assessed penalties against
LDR pursuant to 19 U.S.C. section 1592, and then pursued those
penalties by filing a claim in LDR's bankruptcy proceeding.

The Relators' primary argument against application of the
government action bar to this case is that U.S. Customs did not
pursue an "administrative civil money penalty proceeding" against
LDR, as section 3730(e)(3) requires. Relators characterize U.S.
Customs's pursuit of payment from LDR as "a bill for duties [that]
is quite different from a penalty proceeding under 19 U.S.C. §
1592(b)."

The problem with this argument is that the proof of claim U.S.
Customs filed in the bankruptcy court notes that the findings
supporting the claim "are the result of the penalty pursuant to 19
U.S.C. section 1592." R. 45-5 at 8.2 Contrary to Relators'
allegation that U.S. Customs merely sent LDR "a bill" for unpaid
duties, the proof of claim shows that U.S. Customs pursued a
penalty amount far greater than the $6.7 million for which LDR was
allegedly "billed."

Relators' claims are unlike those at issue in Absher where the
Seventh Circuit held that the False Claims Act allegations were not
based on the same allegations and transactions as the prior penalty
proceedings. In that case, a nursing home was alleged to have
provided substandard care and to have made false claims when it
certified that the care met the standard in seeking payment. The
Seventh Circuit held that the government's knowledge of substandard
care (uncovered during an administrative investigation) did not
necessarily demonstrate that the government had knowledge that the
nursing home acted with the scienter necessary to state a claim
under the False Claims Act. In this case, however, it is not
possible to similarly separate the underlying activity from the
misrepresentation about the activity. Rather, LDR's
misrepresentations about the pipe characteristics is the relevant
activity itself. Thus, both the U.S. Customs penalty proceeding and
Relators' claims are based on misrepresentations inherent to
misclassifying imported products.

In addition to claiming that the Defendants evaded customs duties
by improperly classifying the imported pipe (Count One), Relators
claim that Defendants evaded customs duties by using improper
labels to identify the pipe's country of origin (Count Two). So
called "marking duties" are assessed if the import does not
properly identify the country of origin. The parties do not address
whether Relators' claim regarding marking duties can be said to be
"based upon allegations or transactions" which were "the subject
of" the penalty proceedings U.S. Customs brought against LDR. U.S.
Customs' proof of claim in the bankruptcy proceedings does not
appear to specifically reference a marking duty violation. But the
initial proof of claim document notes that part of the U.S. Customs
investigation addressed the allegation that LDR paid the duty for
imports "from Korea; however it turned out that the merchandise
came from China." Clearly, U.S. Customs was concerned with how LDR
had misidentified the country of origin for its products, which is
the underlying misrepresentation when failing to pay marking
duties. Thus, the Court finds that both of Relators' claims were
addressed by the U.S. Custom penalty proceeding against LDR, and
are barred by section 3730(e)(3).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
May 23, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2sZLu0I from
Leagle.com.

Roger B. Schagrin & Roger B. Schagrin, PC, doing business as
Schagrin Associates, Plaintiffs, represented by David Joel Chizewer
-- david.chizewer@goldbergkohn.com -- Goldberg Kohn Ltd. & Matthew
K. Organ -- matthew.organ@goldbergkohn.com -- Goldberg Kohn.

LDR Industries, LLC, GB Holdings, Inc., Larry Greenspon & Dennis
Greenspon, Defendants, represented by Theresa Lynn Davis --
tdavis@reedsmith.com -- Reed Smith LLP, Andrew C. Bernasconi --
abernasconi@reedsmith.com -- Reed Smith LLP, pro hac vice, Kristen
Annemarie Bradley -- kbradley@reedsmith.com -- Reed Smith Llp &
Steven Alan Miller -- smiller@reedsmith.com -- Reed Smith LLP.

                      About LDR Industries

For over 75 years, Chicago-based LDR Industries and its predecessor
companies have engaged in the distribution of plumbing products to
the home improvement industry, including faucets, showers, sinks,
toilet seats and variety of other specialty lines such as lead-free
valves.

LDR Industries, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Case No. 14-32138) in Chicago, Illinois on Sept. 2, 2014, with
plans to sell the business following a dispute with the U.S.
Customs.

The bankruptcy case is assigned to Honorable Judge Pamela S.
Hollis.  The Debtor is represented by attorneys at Reed Smith LLP.

The Debtor disclosed $27,538,561 in assets and $29,751,647 in
liabilities as of the Chapter 11 filing.


LITCHFIELD LASER: Taps Blum Shapiro as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------
Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut to hire Blum
Shapiro & Co., P.C., as its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in formulating a cash collateral
budget and compiling operating reports; examine its books and
records; assist in formulating a plan of reorganization; and assist
in any additional financial or forensic investigations requested by
the Debtor.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Partners/Principals     $410 to $465
     Managers/Directors      $300 to $400
     Senior Staff            $210 to $285
     Staff                   $125 to $200

Prior to the Petition Date, Blum Shapiro received a retainer in the
amount of $10,000.

Erum Randhawa, a certified public accountant employed with Blum
Shapiro, disclosed in a court filing that her firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

         Erum Randhawa
         Blum Shapiro & Co., P.C.
         29 South Main St.
         P.O. Box 272000
         West Hartford, CT 06127
         Phone: (860) 561-4000
         Direct Dial: (860) 570-6498
         Fax: (860) 521-9241 / (860) 726-7598
         E-mail: erandhawa@blumshapiro.com

                 About Litchfield Laser Skin Care

Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50661) on May
25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Dr. Elizabeth Galan, owner,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
$1 million.


LITCHFIELD LASER: Taps Lawrence & Jurkiewicz as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut to hire Lawrence &
Jurkiewicz, LLC as its legal counsel.
  
The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in the negotiation of debt
restructuring and related transactions; assist in the preparation
of a plan of reorganization; and provide other legal services
related to its Chapter 11 case.

Edward Jurkiewicz, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the
case, charges an hourly fee of $300.  Paralegals charge $100 per
hour.

Prior to the Petition Date, the firm received a retainer of
$10,000, plus $1,717 for the filing and administrative fees.

Mr. Jurkiewicz disclosed in a court filing that the firm and its
members and employees are "disinterested persons" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Lawrence & Jurkiewicz can be reached through:

     Edward P. Jurkiewicz, Esq.
     Lawrence & Jurkiewicz, LLC
     60 East Main Street
     Avon, CT 06001
     Tel: (860) 299-6263
     Fax: (860) 677-5005
     Email: edwardjurkiewicz@sbcglobal.net

                 About Litchfield Laser Skin Care

Litchfield Laser Skin Care, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 18-50661) on May
25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Dr. Elizabeth Galan, owner,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
$1 million.


M2 SYSTEMS: ProHealth Pharmacy Buying Property for $3.2K
--------------------------------------------------------
M2 Systems Corp. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Florida to authorize the sale of office furniture,
cubicles, and miscellaneous equipment to ProHealth Pharmacy
Solutions for $3,200.

The Property to be sold are (i) 20 Office Cubicles; (ii) Conference
Room Table and matching chairs; (ii) 10-12 desks; (iii) Bookcases;
(iv) Miscellaneous Chairs; (v) Lamps; (vi) Credenzas; (vii) white
boards; (viii) Fire proof safes; (ix) Cabinets; (x) Refrigerator;
and (x) Computer rack.

M2 will be moving to smaller offices and, as a result, desires to
sell the Property.  The Property will be sold for cash due upon
sale.  The Debtor estimates that the Property has a fair market
value of no more than $3,000.  It asserts that the Property is
fully depreciated, of de minimus value, and is burdensome to the
estate.  The sale price will be $3,200 cash, payable in one lump
sum payment.

The Property is being sold "as is" with no Warranties of any kind.
The Buyer is moving into a space next to the Debtor's prior
location and, thus, willing to pay above market value.  The Buyer
is not a creditor in the case.  The Debtor proposes to sell to the
Buyer free and clear of all liens and interests.  It is unaware of
any security interests or other liens on the Property, and all of
the proceeds will be net to the estate.

A copy of the Bill of Sale attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/M2_Systems_58_Sales.pdf

The Debtor believes the sale is in the best interest of the
creditors of the estate.

                  About M2 Systems Corporation

M2 Systems Corporation -- https://www.m2-corp.com/ -- provides
computer automated solutions for practical business problems
utilizing technology serving the financial, healthcare, retail,
security, transportation, logistics and telecommunications
industries.  It specializes in developing, marketing and
implementing transaction technologies for both established and
emerging markets as well as creating outlets for licensing and
operating its solution sets. M2 Systems was founded in 1986 and is
headquartered in Maitland, Florida.

M2 Systems sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 18-01339) on March 12, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Joseph W. Adams, CEO and director, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of
$1 million to $10 million.  Latham, Shuker, Eden & Beaudine, LLP,
is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MANUGRAPH AMERICAS: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 26
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
is set to hold a hearing on July 26 to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan for Manugraph Americas, Inc.

The hearing will be held at 10:00 a.m., at The Ronald Reagan
Federal Building, Bankruptcy Courtroom.

The court had earlier approved Manugraph Americas' disclosure
statement, allowing the company to start soliciting votes from
creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Robert Opel, II on May 24, set a June 28
deadline for creditors to file their objections and submit ballots
of acceptance or rejection of the plan.

                    About Manugraph Americas, Inc.

Manugraph Americas, Inc., formerly known as Manugraph DGM, Inc. and
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Manugraph India Ltd., manufacture and
supply printing presses and parts and service for printing systems
in the newspaper and commercial printing market.

Manugraph Americas is based in central Pennsylvania and sells to
both domestic and international customers. Included within its
accounts is a wholly-owned subsidiary, Offset Services, Inc. (OSI),
which is inactive.  Manugraph Americas retains legal ownership of
the subsidiary and its name.

Manugraph Americas sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-02306) on June 1,
2017. Andrew Welker, chief operating officer, signed the petition.
As of March 17, 2017, the Debtor had $6.38 million in assets and
$2.06 million in liabilities.

Judge Robert N. Opel II presides over the case.  The Debtor hired
Cunningham, Chernicoff & Warshawsky, P.C. as counsel.

The Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan on March 23, 2018.


MARBLE MASTERS: Taps Boyer Terry as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Marble Masters of Middle Georgia, Inc., seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Georgia to hire
Boyer Terry, LLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; take necessary actions related to the use by the
Debtor of its property pledged as collateral; prosecute claims of
the Debtor; and provide other legal services related to its Chapter
11 case.

The firm's hourly rates range from $300 to $340 for attorneys.
Research assistants and paralegals charge $100 per hour.

Neither Boyer Terry nor any of its attorneys and employees holds or
represents any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate and
creditors, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Wesley J. Boyer, Esq.
     Boyer Terry, LLC
     348 Cotton Avenue, Suite 200
     Macon, GA 31201
     Tel: 478-742-6481
     Email: Wes@WesleyJBoyer.com

              About Marble Masters of Middle Georgia

Marble Masters of Middle Georgia, Inc., d/b/a ISD Cabinets & Supply
-- https://www.marblemasters.com/ -- specializes in the
installation, restoration and maintenance of marble, granite, and
quartz surfaces for residential and commercial clients.
Headquartered in Warner Robins, Georgia, the Company handles new
construction or makeover projects.

Marble Masters sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Case No. 18-50891) on May 11, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Neil D. Suggs, managing member, the Debtor
estimated $50,000 to $100,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in debt.  The Hon. Austin E. Carter presides the case.
Wesley J. Boyer, Esq., at Boyer Law Firm, L.L.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.


MAY ARTS: Unsecured Creditors to Receive 1.5% Distribution
----------------------------------------------------------
May Arts, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania a second amended disclosure statement
describing their second amended plan of reorganization dated May
29, 2018.

This latest plan provides additional information on the treatment
of Class 1 unsecured claims. As provided in the previous plan, the
Debtor proposes to pay $50,000 to the holders of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims, by distributing $10,000, annually, on a pro-rata
basis. The Debtor now estimates that the creditors in this class
will receive no more than a 1.5% distribution on their claims.

A copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-16869-135.pdf

A copy of the Second Amended Plan is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-16869-134.pdf

                  About May Arts

Founded in 1980's in Riverside, Connecticut, May Arts LLC, formerly
known as Compass Designs, LLC --  -- https://www.mayarts.com/ -- is
a family-owned supplier of ribbons, serving a wide variety of
merchants from large retail outlets to home-based business.  May
Arts carries a wide selection of ribbons to choose from, like
sheer, satin, grosgrain, and silk in a variety of prints and
patterns.  The Company has over 5,000 ribbon variations in stock in
its warehouse facility in Stamford, Connecticut.  May Arts serves a
wide range of industries, including: craft & hobby, scrapbooking,
paper crafts, card making, stationery, gift  wrapping & packaging,
fashion & apparel, jewelry, home decor & interior design, floral,
confectionery (chocolates), wedding & party decoration, quilting,
craft sewing & doll making and mixed media.

May Arts filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.
Pa. Case No. 17-16869) on Oct. 9, 2017, estimating their assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million each.  The
petition was signed by Joseph S. Duffey, president.

Judge Eric L. Frank presides over the case.

Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq., and Jennifer E. Cranston, Esq., at
Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, P.C., serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


MESOBLAST LIMITED: Appoints Former Anthem CEO to Board
------------------------------------------------------
Joseph R. Swedish has joined Mesoblast Limited's Board of
Directors.  Mr. Swedish has more than two decades of healthcare
leadership experience as the CEO for major U.S. healthcare
organizations.  Most recently, he has served as executive chairman,
president and CEO of Anthem Inc., a Fortune 33 company and the
leading health benefits provider in the U.S.  

Prior to joining Anthem, Mr. Swedish was CEO for several major
integrated healthcare delivery systems, including Trinity Health
and Colorado's Centura Health.  He currently serves on the Board of
Directors for IBM Corporation, CDW Corporation, and Proteus Digital
Health.  For 12 consecutive years, Modern Healthcare named Mr.
Swedish as one of the 100 Most Influential People in Healthcare.

Commenting on his appointment, Mr. Swedish stated: "I am very
pleased to join the Board of Mesoblast, a leading cell therapy
company whose strategy is consistent with my objectives to deliver
innovative, cost-effective solutions to some of the most pressing
healthcare challenges today."

Mesoblast Chairman Brian Jamieson said: "Mr Swedish's strong record
of understanding U.S. healthcare resource allocation and
reimbursement metrics is in line with the Board's objective to
strengthen its commercial focus.  Mr. Swedish replaces Dr. Ben-Zion
Weiner, who we thank for his valuable contributions to Mesoblast
over the past five years, especially in relation to our research
and development pipeline."

Ignite Partners advised Mesoblast on the appointment of Mr.
Swedish.

                      About Mesoblast

Australia-based Mesoblast Limited (ASX:MSB; Nasdaq:MESO) --
http://www.mesoblast.com/-- is a global developer of innovative
cell-based medicines.  The Company has leveraged its proprietary
technology platform, which is based on specialized cells known as
mesenchymal lineage adult stem cells, to establish a broad
portfolio of late-stage product candidates.  Mesoblast's
allogeneic, 'off-the-shelf' cell product candidates target advanced
stages of diseases with high, unmet medical needs including
cardiovascular conditions, orthopedic disorders, immunologic and
inflammatory disorders and oncologic/hematologic conditions.  The
Company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Mesoblast Limited reported a net loss before income tax of US$90.21
million for the year ended June 30, 2017, a net loss before income
tax of US$90.82 million for the year ended June 30, 2016, and a net
loss before income tax of US$96.24 million for the year ended June
30, 2015.  As of March 31, 2018, Mesoblast had US$677.85 million in
total assets, US$121.72 million in total liabilities and US$556.13
million in total equity.

PricewaterhouseCoopers, in Melbourne, Australia, issued a "going
concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended June 30, 2017, noting that Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


MGM RESORTS: Moody's Rates $500MM Unsec. Notes Due 2025 'Ba3'
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba3 rating to MGM Resorts
International's proposed $500 million senior unsecured notes due
2025. The notes will be guaranteed by substantially all of the
company's wholly owned domestic subsidiaries that guarantee its
other senior debt. The net note proceeds will be used for general
corporate purposes, which could include refinancing existing
indebtedness, funding a portion of the cost of acquisitions the
Company consummates, paying dividends or stock repurchases. A
portion of the proceeds is expected to repay revolver outstandings
thereby creating capacity in advance of a $850 million bond
maturity in February 2019.

Rating assigned:

Proposed $500 million senior unsecured notes due 2025 at Ba3
(LGD4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

MGM Resorts International (Ba3 positive) benefits from large scale,
diversified presence on the Las Vegas Strip across multiple
customer segments, a solid position within several regional
markets, and improving operating conditions domestically and in
Macau. Consolidated and restricted group leverage and coverage is
expected to continue to improve due to modest earnings growth and
contribution from the opening of MGM Cotai and MGM Springfield in
2018. The company's updated financial policy targets to maintain
consolidated net debt/EBITDA in a range of 3.0 - 4.0x by 2019;
which roughly translates to 4.0x-5.0x on a Moody's adjusted basis.
MGM is constrained by its concentration in Las Vegas (approximately
63% of consolidated 2017 EBITDA), exposure to the Macau gaming
market that has experienced volatility in recent years and the
ramp-up risk associated with new resort developments - MGM Cotai
(opened in Q1 2018) and MGM Springfield (opening in August 2018).
Moody's expects MGM will actively pursue other large integrated
resort development projects (e.g. Japan) that would require
significant equity investment and debt to finance construction and
will continue to expand its domestic operations in partnership with
MGM Growth Properties LLC.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's view that consolidated
operating results will improve over the next year due to higher
domestic earnings, contribution from new project openings in
Massachusetts and Macau that will result in an improvement in
credit metrics to levels supportive of a higher rating.

Ratings could be upgraded if: Consolidated debt/EBITDA is sustained
below 5.0x, fixed charge coverage remains above 2.0x; the company
maintains sufficient liquidity to support both recourse and
non-recourse subsidiaries; operating results of MGM China
operations, including MGM Cotai, track to estimated levels and
share repurchases are funded with asset sale proceeds or cash on
hand rather than debt. The credit ratios required for an upgrade
also takes into account that reported credit metrics may experience
some variability due to the timing of new resort openings and the
closing of the announced and potential acquisitions.

Ratings could be downgraded if operating results from new project
openings fall materially below estimates, if consolidated gross
debt/EBITDA is sustained above 6.0x, if EBITDA/fixed charges
declines below 1.75x or the company deviates materially from its
financial policy goals.


MLW LLC: Taps Furr & Cohen as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------
MLW, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida to hire Furr & Cohen, P.A., as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; represent the Debtor in negotiations with
creditors in the preparation of a bankruptcy plan; and provide
other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm received an initial retainer from the Debtor in the amount
of $25,000, of which $10,100 was used to pay attorneys' fees and
$1,717 for the filing fee.

Alan Crane, Esq., at Furr & Cohen, disclosed in a court filing that
he and his firm do not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor
or its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Alan R. Crane, Esq.
     Furr & Cohen, P.A.
     2255 Glades Rd #337W
     Boca Raton, FL 33431
     Tel: (561) 395-0500
     Fax: (561) 338-7532
     E-mail: acrane@furrcohen.com

                         About MLW LLC

MLW, LLC is a lessor of real estate in Boynton Beach, Florida.  It
is the fee simple owner of a real property located at 10207 100th
Street, South Boynton Beach, Florida, valued by the company at $1
million.

MLW, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-14567) on April 18, 2018.

In the petition signed by Mark L. Woolfson, managing member, the
Debtor disclosed $1.06 million in assets and $1.22 million in
liabilities.  

Judge Erik P. Kimball presides over the case.


MOBILEDIRECT INC: Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case
------------------------------------------------------------
In the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case captioned In re MOBILEDIRECT,
INC., Debtor, Case No. 16-60596-11 (Bankr. D. Mont.), creditor
Arthur Milliken filed a Motion to Dismiss or Convert the case to
Chapter 7, and Objection to Entry of Final Decree. Milliken
contends that the Debtor is not entitled to a final decree because
Debtor failed to enter into any license agreement for the license
or sale of some or all of its assets within the "Marketing Term"
defined in the Debtor's confirmed Amended Plan of Liquidation and
the Plan provides for dismissal under those circumstances. Debtor
MobileDirect objected to the Motion, arguing that the Motion is
devoid of a legal or factual basis.

Bankruptcy Judge Benjamin P. Hursh sustains Milliken's Objection to
entry of a Final Decree, vacates the Final Decree, and grants
Milliken's Motion to Dismiss for Debtor's material default with
respect to the confirmed Plan.

The Court finds that the Debtor in this case acted in a manner
inconsistent with its confirmed Plan. Debtor's change in strategy
is essentially a modification of Debtor's Plan, and a switch from
liquidation to reorganization. Had Debtor wanted to modify the
Plan, it could have done so by filing a motion under section
1127(b) which allows for modification after confirmation, subject
to sections 1122, 1123, 1129, notice and a hearing. The Court is
troubled by Debtor's disregard for the Plan, section 1127(b) and
the corresponding decision to frustrate the Plan by entering a
transaction that bears no indicia of legitimacy and achieved
nothing significant for Debtor, except an extension of time at the
creditors' expense.

The circumstances surrounding the formation of Metadirect, Inc.,
the timing of the transaction between Debtor and Metadirect, the
absence of any material economic benefit to Debtor from the
Metadirect Transaction, and the Court's determination that Clyde
Neu's testimony at the hearing could not be reconciled with the
Disclosure Statement, or the Plan's formulation and confirmation,
all weigh in favor of concluding the Metadirect Transaction was
inconsistent with the Plan's overarching purpose, liquidation.
Further, the Court cannot conclude that it was a bonafide
transaction. At its best, the Metadirect Transaction deviated from
the terms of the confirmed Plan and represents a material default.
At its worst, the Metadirect Transaction was a deliberate attempt
by Debtor to avoid the consequences of the confirmed Plan,
resulting in a "sham" agreement between two identities whose
composition, management and names are remarkably similar and
intertwined. Ultimately, Debtor did not, for purposes of the Plan,
enter into an agreement that generates revenue for the Debtor
post-confirmation within the 6-month Marketing Term. The Metadirect
Transaction constitutes a material default with respect to the
confirmed Plan under section 1112(b)(4)(N).

Having considered conversion, dismissal and whether unusual
circumstances permeate the case, the Court has determined that
dismissal is the corresponding outcome that must accompany its
finding that a material default under the Plan occurred. Although
the Court is cognizant that dismissal does not benefit any of the
creditors, perhaps with the exception of Milliken, the Court notes
that dismissal is wholly consistent with the Plan. Creditors cannot
complain that dismissal is at odds with their expectations because
the Plan specifically allowed for dismissal as a remedy, should
Debtor fail to liquidate the property within the Marketing Term.

Should a debtor encounter circumstances which require it to modify
its plan post confirmation under section 1127(b), a debtor must do
so. The Court cannot conceive of circumstances under which a
debtor's unilateral decision to deviate from a confirmed plan and
switch from a liquidation to a reorganization, or vice versa,
without court approval under section 1127(b) would not constitute a
material default under section 1112(b)(4)(N).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum of Decision dated May
24, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2HYf9vW from Leagle.com.

MOBILEDIRECT, INC., Debtor, represented by STEVEN M. JOHNSON --
smjohnson109@yahoo.com

OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, U.S. Trustee, represented by NEAL G.
JENSEN, UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S OFFICE & AARON GRAHAM YORK, OFFICE
OF THE US TRUSTEE.

                     About Mobiledirect, Inc.

MobileDirect Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mont. Case
No. 16-60596), on June 13, 2016.  The petition was signed by Clyde
Neu, Co-Founder and CFO.  

The case is assigned to Judge Ralph B. Kirscher.  The Debtor is
represented by Steve M. Johnson, Esq., at Church, Harris, Johnson
and Williams, P.C.  Anderson ZurMuehlen was employed as accountant
to the Debtor.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated assets at $0 to $50,000
and liabilities at $100,000 to $500,000.


MOEINI CORP: Yi Xiang Ou Buying Foley Property for $1 Million
-------------------------------------------------------------
Moeini Corp. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Alabama to authorize the sale of the real property and
improvements thereon known as 1605 South State Highway 59, also
known as 1605 McKenzie Avenue, Foley, Alabama, and items of
equipment attached to said building including hood, cooler with
refrigeration equipment, range, icemaker and booths, to Yi Xiang Ou
or his designee for $1.05 million, plus closing costs.

At the time of the filing of its Chapter 11 proceeding, the Debtor
owned the Property subject to a mortgage in favor of Regions Bank
and a second mortgage to the U.S. Small Business Administration
which mortgages secure a debts with an unpaid balance of
approximately $942,000 plus interest.

The Debtor has received an offer to purchase said property together
with a $10,000 earnest money deposit from Yi Xiang Ou or his
designee, free and clear of liens, for an amount equal to $1.5
million, plus closing costs for which purchaser is responsible.
The Debtor has agreed to accept said offer, subject to the Court's
approval.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Moeini_Corp_152_Sales.pdf

From the gross sales proceeds, the Debtor proposes to pay (1) the
balance owed to Regions Bank secured by said property, (2) the
balance to the U.S. Small Business Administration secured by said
property, (3) all closing costs and fees required to be paid by
Seller under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, (4) all ad
valorem taxes required to be paid by the Seller under the Purchase
Agreement, and (5) the amount of $4,875 to Irvin Grodsky's P.C.'s
IOLTA account to be used to pay the Chapter 11 Quarterly Fees for
the calendar quarter during which the sale is closed.

The Debtor is of the opinion that the sale of said property under
these circumstances and the use of the proceeds as described are in
the best interest of all creditors.  It states that cause exists to
annul the stay of the Order under BR 6004(h) for that the Purchaser
wants to expeditiously close the purchase.

                  About Moeini Corporation

Moeini Corporation is a franchisee of IHOP restaurants with
locations in the Alabama and Florida market.  It sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No.
17-04073) on October 26, 2017.  Mehdi Moeini, its president, signed
the petition.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Irvin
Grodskyg, in Mobile, Alabama, serves as counsel to the Debtor.



MONTGOMERY SERVICES: Allowed to Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mindy A. Mora of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida authorized Montgomery Services, Inc.,
d/b/a Mammoth Restoration of the Palm Beaches to use the cash
collateral of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association on a final
basis.

The Debtor is permitted to use cash collateral, including the cash
or noncash proceeds of assets that were not cash collateral on the
Petition Date up to the amounts shown in the Budget. The Debtor
will operate strictly in accordance with the Budget and to spend
cash collateral, not to exceed 10% above the budgeted amount. The
approved Budget provides expenses in the aggregate amount of
$38,087.

JPMorgan is granted a valid, perfected lien upon, and security
interest in, to the extent and in the order of priority of any
valid lien pre-petition, all cash generated post-petition by the
Property, as adequate protection for the use of cash collateral and
for any diminution in value of JPMorgan's prepetition collateral as
described in the loan documents between the Debtor and JPMorgan and
post-petition interest, costs, and fees, and as security of the
Post-petition Indebtedness.

Unless waived by JPMorgan in writing, the Debtor will immediately
cease using cash collateral upon the occurrence of one of the
following events:

     (a) If a trustee is appointed in this Chapter 11 Case;

     (b) If the Debtor breaches any terms or conditions of the
Final Order or any of JPMorgan's loan documents, other than
defaults existing as of the Petition Date;

     (c) If the Case is converted to a case under Chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code;

     (d) If the case is dismissed; or

     (e) If any violation or breach of any provision of the Final
Order occurs.

A full-text copy of the Final Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-15699-30.pdf

                   About Montgomery Services

Montgomery Services, Inc., d/b/a Mammoth Restoration of the Palm
Beaches, is a leader in Pennsylvania repair and restoration.
Montgomery Services filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-15699) on
May 11, 2018. In the petition signed by its president, Nathan M
Smith, the Debtor disclosed under $500,000 both in assets and
liabilities.  Aaron A. Wernick, Esq., at Furr & Cohen, is the
Debtor's counsel.


MWM & SONS: Sept. 5 Hearing on Plan and Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Wendelin I. Lipp of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland conditionally approved MWM & Sons,
Corporation's amended disclosure statement referring to an amended
plan dated June 5, 2018.

The hearing to consider the final approval of the Amended
Disclosure Statement and the confirmation of the Amended Plan will
be held in Courtroom 3C of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, U.S.
Courthouse, 6500 Cherrywood Lane, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770, on
Sept. 5, 2018, at 10:00 A.M.

July 12, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the conditionally approved Amended Disclosure
Statement or confirmation of the Amended Plan, the last day for
filing written acceptances or rejections of the Amended Plan.

                      About MWM & Sons

MWM & Sons Corporation filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.MD. Case No. 16-25851) on Dec. 2, 2016.  In its petition,
the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The petition was signed by Moin M. Ahmad, president.
The Hon. Wendell I. Lipp presides over the case.  The Burns Law
Firm is the Debtor's counsel.  Weil, Akman, Baylin & Coleman, PA,
is the Debtor's accountant.


NEOVASC INC: First U.S. Patient Implanted with Reducer
------------------------------------------------------
Neovasc Inc. announced the first U.S. patient has been implanted
with a Neovasc Reducer, a CE-Marked medical device for the
treatment of refractory angina.  The Compassionate Use case was
conducted by Dr. Gerald Koenig, along with Dr. Ryan Gindi and
colleagues, of the Division of Cardiology at Henry Ford Hospital in
Detroit, Michigan.

Dr. Koenig commented, "This patient has severe coronary artery
disease and has suffered from refractory angina for a few years.
The condition has had a significant impact on his quality of life
during this time, with little to no relief from multiple other
widely accepted treatment options."

"This novel device has accumulating evidence supporting the
physiological basis and associated clinical benefit.  My experience
with the Reducer during the procedure, was very positive.  The
process is similar to implanting a stent.  In terms of the patient,
he tolerated the procedure very well and had no complications,"
concluded Dr. Koenig.

"We are pleased to provide this patient the opportunity to receive
a Reducer implanted under Compassionate Use.  As our studies and
patients in multiple geographies, including Europe, Israel and
Saudi Arabia, have shown, this device offers angina sufferers the
potential to improve exercise capacity and resume a normal life,
free of the pain and discomfort that has often limited their
ability to perform normal daily activities," commented Fred Colen,
Neovasc's president and chief executive officer.  "The Reducer
continues to gain attention from medical professionals around the
world as the number of patient cases have increased with the
scaling of our commercial activities."

Refractory angina, resulting in continued symptoms despite maximal
medical therapy and without revascularization options, is estimated
to affect 600,000 to 1.8 million Americans, with 50,000 to 100,000
new cases per year.

                        About Neovasc Inc.

Based in Richmond, British Columbia, Neovasc Inc. --
http://www.neovasc.com/-- is a specialty medical device company
that develops, manufactures and markets products for the rapidly
growing cardiovascular marketplace.  Its products include the
Neovasc Reducer, for the treatment of refractory angina, which has
been available in Europe since 2015, and the Tiara, for the
transcatheter treatment of mitral valve disease, which is currently
under clinical investigation in the United States, Canada and
Europe.

Neovasc reported a net loss of US$22.91 million on US$5.38 million
of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss
of US$86.49 million on US$9.51 million of revenue for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of Dec. 31, 2017, the Company had US$22.20
million in total assets, US$58.66 million in total liabilities and
a total deficit of US$36.47 million.

Grant Thornton issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017, stating that the Company incurred a consolidated net loss of
US$24.86 million during the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and, as of
that date, the Company's consolidated current liabilities exceeded
its current assets by US$6.06 million.  The auditors said these
conditions, along with other matters, indicate the existence of a
material uncertainty that casts substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


NEW CITY: Baisley Park, Republic Carting Oppose Plan Outline
------------------------------------------------------------
Baisley Park Carting, Co., Inc., asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York to deny the disclosure
statement filed by The New City Waste Services, Inc. and City Waste
Services of New York, Inc., saying it does not provide "adequate
information."

"The disclosure statement is devoid of any description of the
debtors' relationship with the various insiders that have been paid
over $5.67 million in this case since the filing date," said
Baisley's attorney Michael Amato, Esq., at Ruskin Moscou
Faltischek, P.C., in Uniondale, New York.

According to the attorney, the insiders including the companies'
shareholders "have reaped substantial benefits to the detriment of
creditors."

Under U.S. bankruptcy law, the proponent of a Chapter 11 plan must
get court approval of its disclosure statement to begin soliciting
acceptances from creditors.  The document must contain adequate
information to enable creditors to make an informed decision about
the plan.

Mr. Amato also argued that the companies' proposed restructuring
plan violates the "absolute priority rule" of the Bankruptcy Code.
He pointed out that the plan provides for equity holders to retain
their interests while paying general unsecured creditors only 25%
of their claims.

Another unsecured creditor, Republic Carting Co., Inc., also
criticized the disclosure statement, saying it fails to provide
adequate information that would enable creditors to make an
informed decision about the plan.

Baisley is represented by:

     Michael S. Amato, Esq.
     Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.
     East Tower, 15th Floor
     1425 RXR Plaza
     Uniondale, NY 11556-1425
     Phone 516.663.6517 / 516.663.6600
     Fax 516.663.6717
     Email mamato@rmfpc.com

Republic Carting is represented by:

     Richard E. Weltman, Esq.
     Michele K. Jaspan, Esq.
     Weltman & Moskowitz, LLP
     270 Madison Avenue, Suite 1400
     New York, NY 10016-0603
     Phone: (212) 684-7800
     Fax: (212) 684-7995
     Email: Richard E. Weltman
     Email: Michele K. Jaspan

                   About New City Waste Services

Headquartered in Yorktown Heights, New York, The New City Waste
Services, Inc. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 12-22578) on March 20, 2012, with estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and estimated liabilities of $1,000,001
to $10,000,000.

New City's affiliate City Waste Services of New York, Inc. also
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 12-22579) on March 19, 2012.  

The petitions were signed by James T. Tesi, secretary and
treasurer.

Judge Robert D. Drain presides over the cases.  The Debtors tapped
Rattet Pasternak, LLP as their legal counsel.


NORTHERN OIL: Agrees to Swap $22.8 Million Notes for Equity
-----------------------------------------------------------
On June 18 and June 19, 2018, Northern Oil and Gas, Inc., entered
into two independent, separately negotiated exchange agreements
with holders of the Company's 8.00% senior notes due 2020.

Pursuant to the first agreement, the Company agreed to issue
1,012,652 shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001
per share, in exchange for $3,000,000 aggregate principal amount of
the Notes.  Subject to certain exceptions, the holder agreed to
lock-up restrictions on these shares for 90 days.  The holder is
permitted to sell these shares after the lock-up period, subject to
certain volume limitations, and if the average sales price of these
shares is below a certain price, the Company will be required to
issue additional shares of Common Stock to the holder. The initial
shares of Common Stock are expected to be issued on or about June
21, 2018.

Pursuant to the second agreement, the Company agreed to issue
6,582,018 shares of Common Stock, in exchange for $19,807,000
aggregate principal amount of the Notes.  Subject to certain
exceptions, the holder agreed to lock-up restrictions on these
shares until June 1, 2019.  If at the end of the lock-up period the
average closing price of the Common Stock during a specified period
is below a certain price, the Company will be required to issue
additional shares of Common Stock to the holder.  The initial
shares of Common Stock are expected to be issued on or about June
25, 2018.

The issuance of the shares of Common Stock in exchange for the
Notes is being made in reliance on the exemption from registration
provided in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

                      About Northern Oil    

Minnetonka, Minnesota-based Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. --
http://www.NorthernOil.com/-- is an independent energy company
engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and production
of oil and natural gas properties, primarily in the Bakken and
Three Forks formations within the Williston Basin in North Dakota
and Montana.  

Northern Oil reported a net loss of $9.19 million in 2017, a net
loss of $293.5 million in 2016, and a net loss of $975.4 million in
2015.  As of March 31, 2018, Northern Oil had $664.5 million in
total assets, $1.15 billion in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficit of $488.8 million.

                          *     *     *

In May 2018, Moody's Investors Service upgraded Northern Oil and
Gas, Inc.'s (NOG) Corporate Family Rating (CFR) to 'Caa1' from
'Caa2' and Probability of Default Rating (PDR) to 'Caa1-PD/LD' from
'Caa2-PD'.  The upgrade of NOG's CFR to Caa1 reflects its improved
leverage profile, reduced refinancing risk associated with the
remaining $203 million of notes due June 2020, and Moody's
expectation that the company will grow production and operating
cash flows.


OAK ROCK: Unsecureds to be Paid 35% Under Liquidating Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
General unsecured creditors of Oak Rock Financial, LLC, will be
paid 35% of their allowed claims under the company's proposed
Chapter 11 plan of liquidation.

Under the liquidating plan, creditors holding Class 2 general
unsecured claims will receive payment in cash on the effective date
of the plan.  

Also classified in Class 2 are creditors who allegedly entered into
various loan participation agreements with Oak Rock and who refuse
to be treated as unsecured claimants.  These creditors assert that
they are entitled to their proportionate share of the ownership of
the purchased loans and accompanying assets.

Just like general unsecured creditors, these alleged participants
will also receive payment in cash equal to 35% of their claims on
the effective date of the liquidating plan.

The estimated amount of allowed Class 2 claims is $29,823,062.
Class 2 is impaired and is entitled to vote on the plan.

All cash necessary to make distributions to creditors will be
obtained from the liquidation proceeds held by Oak Rock in various
operating and escrow accounts, according to the company's
disclosure statement filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb13-72251-1312.pdf

                      About Oak Rock Financial

Oak Rock Financial LLC, an asset-based lender, put itself into
Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Central Islip, New York
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 13-72251) on May 6, 2013.

The Debtor put itself into Chapter 11 in response to the Chapter 7
involuntary petition filed by its creditors, including Israel
Discount Bank of New York, Bank Leumi USA, and Bank Hapoalim B.M.,
on April 29, 2013.

The petitioning creditors had claimed the specialty asset-based
lending firm has committed a "massive fraud" against its secured
lenders.

The Debtor disclosed assets of $131.1 million and debt totaling
$99.9 million in the Chapter 11 papers.

Judge Robert E. Grossman presides over the case.  The Debtor tapped
LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP as its legal counsel.


ONTARIO CENTURY: Gets Court Approval for Liquidating Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois
approved the Chapter 11 plan of liquidation proposed by Ontario
Century Property, LLC.

The court gave the thumbs-up to the liquidating plan after finding
that it satisfied the requirements for confirmation under section
1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.

In the same filing, the court also gave approval to the disclosure
statement, which explains the liquidating plan.  A copy of the
order is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb15-34713-236.pdf

                 About Ontario Century Property

Ontario Century Property, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
N.D. Ill. Case No. 15-34713) on Oct. 13, 2015.  At the date of
filing, the Debtor was the recorded title owner of one Commercial
condominium unit and three residential condominium units.  

The Debtor estimated assets of $0 to $50,000 and $500,001 to $1
million in liabilities.

Joel A. Schechter, Esq., at the Law Offices of Joel Schechterm,
serves as the Debtor's counsel.  The Debtor hired Beermann Pritikin
Mirabelli Swerdlove LLP as its special counsel.

On March 16, 2016, the Debtor filed its Chapter 11 plan of
liquidation.


OSIES INC: July 11 Disclosure Statement Hearing
-----------------------------------------------
The hearing to consider approval of the disclosure statement
explaining Osies, Inc.'s plan of reorganization will be held on
July 11, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., before Judge Jeff Bohm of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.

July 3 is fixed as the last date for filing written objections to
the disclosure statement.

The Debtor's assets consist primarily of real estate, equipment,
and receivables. The Debtor will emerge from Bankruptcy as the
Reorganized Debtor. The Plan, as confirmed by the Court, will
modify the loan agreements with its lenders, Third Coast Bank,
Prosperity Bank, and the SBA. Each lender will retain its liens on
its collateral. In the event that the Reorganized Debtor defaults
under the terms of the Plan or the respective loan documents, as
modified, the lenders may enforce all of their rights and remedies
under their respective modified loan documents and applicable law,
and are not enjoined by the provisions of the Plan from exercising
their rights and remedies, including but not limited to
repossessing and foreclosing the collateral and/or filing suit in
state court. The parties intend that each lender will be paid in
full through a refinance of the indebtedness or payment pursuant to
the terms of its loan documents as modified by the Plan.

The Plan, as confirmed by the Court, will pay the outstanding
indebtedness owed to Harris County and Cypress-Fairbanks ISD,
Horsepen Bayou MUD, and the Internal Revenue Service, in full, over
a five-year period, commencing January 2019.

Class 9 creditors with Allowed General Unsecured Claims will be
paid 10% of their Allowed Claim in monthly installments commencing
March 2020 and continuing thereafter for 60 months. This class is
impaired.

The Plan is to be implemented from the revenues generated by the
business operations. The feasibility of the Plan is dependent on
revenues generated from operations. The risk to creditors, if any,
is dependent upon the Debtor's ability to maintain and increase
production and the stabilization of the oil and gas industry. The
Debtor believes that the Plan is feasible and meets the
requirements of Section 1129(a)(11) of the Bankruptcy Code.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-34996-133.pdf

                        About Osies Inc.

Osies, Inc. -- http://www.osies.com/-- was incorporated in
December 2003 to supply on-site instrumentation and electrical
services for the equipment for the petroleum industry.  Over the
years, it added all other complementary service to convert itself
into a full manufacturing company of equipment for the natural gas
and oil industry.

Osies, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Texas Case No. 17-34996) on Aug. 17, 2017.  In
the petition signed by Jose Rodriguez, its president, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million.  Judge Jeff Bohm presides over the case.  Karen R.
Emmott, Esq., in Houston, Texas, serves as counsel to the Debtor.


PADCO PRESSURE: Trustee Selling Interest in All Equipment for $1M
-----------------------------------------------------------------
John Luster, the Chapter 11 trustee for PADCO Pressure Control,
LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Louisiana to authorize the sale of all of the equipment in which
the Debtor has an interest to Integrity Energy Services, LLC, for
$1 million.

Known lienholders are Cross Keys Bank and Home Federal Bank.  PADCO
Pressure Control, LLC and PADCO Energy Services, LLC are potential
interest owners.  No other known lienholders are thought to be
involved with the assets in the sale.

The Trustee proposes to sell the Equipment free and clear of all
liens and interests, referring liens and interests to the
proceeds.

A copy of the list of Equipment to be sold attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/PADCO_Pressure_235_Sales.pdf

                  About PADCO Pressure Control

PADCO Pressure Control, L.L.C., based in Lafayette, Louisiana,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No. 16-51381) on
Oct. 4, 2016.  In the petition signed by Michael Carr, chief
executive officer, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Robert Summerhays presides over the case.  

Thomas E. St. Germain, member of Weinsten & St. Germain, LLC, is
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

On Oct. 27, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired
Adams and Reese LLP as its legal counsel.

John W. Luster was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.


PARKWAY RADIOLOGY: ADR Buying All Assets for $900K
--------------------------------------------------
Parkway Radiology, LLC asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland to authorize the sale of substantially all
assets to ADR, LLC for $900,000.

The Debtor has entered into an Agreement for the purchase of
substantially all of the assets of the Debtor located at 13 Western
Maryland Parkway, Suite 15, Hagerstown, Maryland to the Purchaser.
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Purchaser will acquire substantially
all of the assets of the Debtor located at the Business Premises
consisting of any equipment, furniture, computers, and furnishings
located at the Business Premises, along with the inventory and
other inventory, as well as the intangible assets including the
name, Parkway Radiology, LLC, and all goodwill associated with that
name and the business, with the exception of one Achieva Quasar M0T
MR System which is secured through a Master Lease Agreement in
favor of Phillips Medical Capital, LLC, and also the subject matter
of a previously filed Motion for Relief From Automatic Stay and
Order entered by the Court.

The Debtor believes that the sale of its assets is in the best
interest of all creditors and will provide for the ongoing
operation of the Debtor in a professional and responsible manner.
The sale of the assets will be beneficial to the estate on a net
recovery basis as the Purchaser intends on leasing the Business
Premises, whereby there will be need to remove the equipment and
there will be damage to premises during any removal process.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Parkway_Radiology_132_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser is represented by:

          H. Gregory Skidmore, Esq.
          SKIDMORE & ALDERSON, PA
          100 South Liberty St.
          Cumberland, MD 21502
          Telephone: (301) 724-3424
          Facsimile: (301) 724-7257

                   About Parkway Radiology

Parkway Radiology LLC is a privately owned radiology center in
Washington County, Maryland.  Parkway Radiology offers both the
Fonar Upright Multi-Position MRI and the 3.0 Tesla.

Parkway Radiology LLC, based in Hagerstown, MD, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-10737) on Jan. 18, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Dr. Ajay K. Goyal, managing member, the
Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Lori S. Simpson presides over the
case.  Robert L. Kline, III, Esq., at Kline Law Group, serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


PATTY DEWITT: Has $750K Upset Bid for Morgantown Property
---------------------------------------------------------
Patty DeWitt filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia the $750,000 upset bid and partial offer
with $10,000 deposit from Croesus Morgantown Holdings, to the sale
of the parcels of real property situate at 1428, 1430 and 1439 Van
Voorhis Rd in Morgantown, Monongalia County, West Virginia, further
described as Union District, 1.03 AC Sur. + Fre C, West Run, 1439
Van Voorhis Rd (Flood Area); -and- 0.77 AC West Run, together with
all improvements located thereon, in opposition to the Hadox bid on
the Filling Station, to be heard at 1:30 p.m. on May 15, 2018.

Should any other competing or upset bids be timely received, then
an auction will take place 30 minutes prior to the sale hearing at
the hearing location.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Patty_DeWitt_251_Sales.pdf

Croesus can be reached at:

          CROESUS MORGANTOWN HOLDINGS
          8199 Mcknight Rd.
          Pittsburgh, PA 15237

Patty JoAnne DeWitt sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. W.Va.
Case No. 17-00120) on Feb. 2, 2017.  The Debtor tapped J. Frederick
Wiley, PLLC, and Johnson Law, PLLC, as counsel.  Howard Hanna
Premier Properties by Barbara Alexander, LLC, by Kay Alexander and
Rob Young were approved by the Court as the Raltor for the Debtor.


PAUL J. HATHAWAY: Court Rejects Bid to Dismiss Nelsons' Suit
------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Joseph M. Meier denied the Defendants' motion to
dismiss the adversary proceeding captioned Janet Nelson and Robert
Nelson, Plaintiffs, v. Paul J. Hathaway and Mikki Jan Hathaway,
husband and wife, Defendants, Adv. Proceeding No. 18-08016-JMM
(Bankr. D. Idaho).

Defendants Paul and Mikki Hathaway moved to dismiss the complaint
filed by the plaintiffs, Janet and Robert Nelson under Rule1 7012
which incorporates Civil Rules 12(b)(6) and (b)(9). In their
supporting brief, Defendants raised four separate grounds for
dismissal of the Complaint. First, that the complaint, which seeks
to determine that the debts owed to Plaintiffs are not
dischargeable, was filed too late. Second, that there are no facts
alleged linking Mikki Jan Hathaway to any wrongdoing. Third, that
there are insufficient facts alleged to support claims. Fourth, the
allegations concerning fraud failed to meet the standard of Rule
7009. The Plaintiffs opposed the Motion in a written response and
in oral argument.

Plaintiffs filed their complaint on March 2, 2018, prior to the
deadline established in the amended notice, but after the deadline
provided in the original notice. In their motion, Defendants
contend the complaint was not timely filed as Rule 4007(c)
originally required a filing by February 13, 2018. Accordingly, the
Court must consider whether it is appropriate to punish the
Plaintiffs for reviewing the docket and following the second
deadline scheduled by the bankruptcy clerk. This Court determines
that the answer is no. Plaintiffs complied with the deadline set
forth by the bankruptcy clerk, and Defendants have not established
any prejudice attributable to the delay of a few days.

The Defendants have cited Willms v. Sanderson, 723 F.3d. 1094 (9th
Cir. 2013), for the proposition that the Court cannot alter the 60
days mandated by Rule 4007 to file a complaint to determine the
dischargeability of a debt under sections 523(c). Willms indeed
holds that a bankruptcy court could not, under the facts presented,
sua sponte alter the 60 days set out under Rule 4007(c) without a
timely motion and a showing of good cause. However, the facts in
Willms are distinguishable from those presented here. In Willms, a
bankruptcy court was acting on a motion filed by a party that did
not provide an adequate showing of cause to extend the 4007(c)
deadline, as opposed to the Court correcting an error it made.
Further, the Ninth Circuit in Willms did not overrule or limit its
prior decision in Anwiller, supra. Thus, reliance on Willms under
our facts is misplaced.

The Tenth Circuit has also recognized that courts have "almost
uniformly allowed an out of time filing when the creditor relies
upon a bankruptcy court notice setting an incorrect deadline." In
that decision, the court issued its first notice but later sent a
second notice changing the deadline from December 21, 1990, to
February 15, 1991. Similar to the Defendants in this case, the
debtors in Themy argued that the complaint filed between these two
dates and after the initial 60 days was untimely and should be
dismissed. The Tenth Circuit agreed with the Ninth Circuit in
Anwiler, finding that the bankruptcy court could correct its
mistake by accepting the complaint filed as a timely complaint.

Finally, Defendants have made no showing that they were prejudiced
by Plaintiffs' filing their adversary complaint 17 days after the
original deadline.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated May 23,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2lb97yV from Leagle.com.

Janet Nelson & Robert Nelson, Plaintiffs, represented by Michael J.
Whyte, Thomsen Holman Wheiler, PLLC.

Paul & Mikki Hathaway & Mikki Jan Hathaway, Defendants, represented
by Robert J. Maynes, Maynes Taggart, PLLC.

Paul J Hathaway and Mikki Jan Hathaway filed for chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 16-40989) on Nov.
9, 2017, and are represented by Robert J. Maynes, Esq. of Maynes
Taggart, PLLC.


PRODUCTION PATTERN: Unsecureds to Get 100% Over 7 Years at 4%
-------------------------------------------------------------
Production Pattern and Foundry Co., Inc., filed a plan of
reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement proposing to
pay general unsecured creditors 100% of their allowed claims within
seven years at the discount rate of 4% per annum.

Class 5 Allowed General Unsecured Claims total approximately
$3,314,157 as of the Petition Date.  Class 5 creditors will be paid
100% of their allowed claims within seven years of the Effective
Date, with interest at the discount rate of 4% per annum,
commencing to accrue interest from the Effective Date until paid in
full.  The Debtor will pay Class 5 creditors' claims on a pro-rata
basis in quarterly installments of no less than $150,000 per
quarter and continuing each quarter thereafter until Class 5 claims
are paid in full with accrued interest.

The Class 5 general unsecured claim of CASS, Inc., may exceed
$2,000,000, which amount the Debtor disputes.  The Debtor and CASS
have agreed to non-binding mediation of the claims with the
involvement of the Court.

The Debtor will fund the proposed Plan payments through revenues
from its ongoing manufacturing business operations.  The Debtor
projects that its current gross monthly revenues will average
$1,799,580 per month for 2018.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-51106-173.pdf

               About Production Pattern and Foundry

Production Pattern and Foundry Co., Inc. -- http://www.ppfco.com/
-- is a TS-16949 Certified, casting foundry, producing aluminum
castings for a wide variety of industries.  PPF produces parts and
equipment components for a broad spectrum of markets -- from
chip-making equipment to drinking fountains.  Typical PPF customer
applications have included: housings mounting bases, manifolds,
valve bodies, door hinges and brackets.  The company also has
experience in heavy truck manufacturing, semiconductor chip
manufacturing equipment, medical and dental equipment
manufacturing, construction, utility, packaging machinery and
sports equipment industries.

Production Pattern filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case
No. 17-51106) on Sept. 20, 2017.  In the petition signed by Arlene
Cochran, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Bruce T.
Beesley.  The Debtor hired Minden Lawyers, LLC, as its bankruptcy
counsel and Harris Law Practice LLC as co-counsel.


PROJECT ANGEL: Fitch Gives First-Time 'B' IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned first-time Long-Term Issuer Default
Ratings (IDRs) of 'B' to Project Angel Holdings, LLC and Project
Angel Intermediate Holdings, LLC (collectively operating as
MeridianLink, Inc.). The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Fitch has also assigned a 'BB'/'RR1' rating to MeridianLink's $35
million secured revolving credit facility (RCF) and $315 million
first-lien secured term loan. The proceeds, along with equity
contribution from Thoma Bravo, will be used to fund the
acquisitions of MeridianLink and CRIF that was announced on March
23, 2018.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Diversified Customer Base: On a pro forma basis, the combination of
MeridianLink and CRIF results in a diverse product and high-quality
customer base reaching over 1,200 customers. The combined company's
footprint will extend to banks, credit unions, verification service
providers and other financial institutions to offer deposit account
opening solutions and end-to-end lending software. On a standalone
basis, MeridianLink's and CRIF have stable and attractive client
bases as demonstrated by their high customer retentions.

Merged Entity Expands Operating Leverage: With the combination of
MeridianLink and CRIF, Fitch expects significant operating leverage
will be realized as redundant operating expenses are eliminated
while limited customer overlaps exist; Fitch anticipate EBITDA
margins will normalize at a higher level in the medium to long
term. Given the similarities in customer bases and product
offerings, Fitch considers integration risks to be limited but
factors in expected one-time costs associated with customer
migration for 2018-2019. In addition, Fitch anticipates incremental
revenue gain from cross-selling opportunities supported by the
broader combined product offerings.

Key Category Leader Across Market Segments: MeridianLink is a
category leader within each of the market segments that it
competes. For consumer lending, the company is the leading
incumbent against a handful of pure-play providers including:
Bottomline Technologies, Gro, CUDL, and Temenos. Management
differentiates itself in this category by best-of-breed technology
and powerful referrals from its existing client base. On the
consumer data front, the company operates as the leading incumbent
against Sharperlending in a highly fragmented and niche marketplace
and is one of seven approved sponsoring credit vendors for Fannie
Mae.

Complementary Product Offerings: MeridianLink's products are highly
complementary, allowing for significant cross-sell opportunities.
For example, a bank client who may use LoansPQ to simplify the
account opening, and loan approval process for an individual may
also rely on credit data and employment verification provided by
MeridianLink's MCL solution. Management has developed a stronghold
in the data verification market by providing a tri-merged credit
reporting platform with ease of integration into its client's
back-office and systems. As a result, the company's solutions are
highly integrated, complementary, and allow for enhanced revenue
generation opportunity.

Resilient Business Model Through Economic Cycles: Fitch believes
MeridianLink's portfolio of products and services could provide a
degree of resilience through economic cycles. The company's core
product is LoansPQ, a SaaS-based origination platform for consumer
loans and deposit applications that saw annual volume increases of
approximately 66% during the recessionary period from 2008 to 2010.
Given the primarily transactions-based revenue model, Fitch
believes this has a high degree of correlation to the revenue. In
an expansionary environment, the company would be well positioned
to generate sizeable returns from volume-based loan applications.
During a recessionary period, the company's focus on collection
solutions and deposit accounts would enable steady generation of
fees based on volume. After the merger with CRIF, loan and deposit
origination product will remain the largest segment for
MeridianLink.

Private equity ownership could limit deleveraging: Pro forma for
the leverage buyout by Thoma Bravo, gross leverage will be elevated
at 6.9x at transaction close. Fitch believes the company has
sizeable FCF capacity to de-lever and could reach 4.3x gross
leverage by FY2021. However, Fitch expects the company to de-lever
at a more moderate pace given the potential for bolt-on
acquisitions funded by cash on hand and additional debt after
integration of CRIF is complete.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Fitch's ratings and Outlook for MeridianLink are supported by the
company's key positions within each of its respective markets
(Consumer Lending, Mortgage Loans, and Data Verification) as well
as a portfolio of products and services that provide its operating
profile with a degree of resilience through economic cycles. The
company's high quality services enable efficiency within the loan
application market and are well positioned to take advantage of the
industry shift to automated lending. Many of the company's services
are viewed as mission critical by banks, credit unions, and other
financial institutions, which results in relative demand
inelasticity.

Fitch expects that the acquisition of CRIF will enable significant
cost synergies and cross-sell opportunities, resulting in increased
profitability and market penetration over the medium to
longer-term. Despite being a SaaS-based platform, MeridianLink's
revenue structure is atypical for SaaS-based products. Its revenues
are primarily transaction-based rather than the typical
subscription-based model for SaaS-based products. Nevertheless,
given the highly integrated nature of its products into customers'
core banking systems and the mission critical nature, Fitch views
such revenue structure as equally resilient. While the product's
mission-critical nature and close integration into customers' core
banking systems contribute to strong client retention
characteristics, Fitch views the volume based revenue model as more
transactional than typical subscription-based models with greater
potential for revenue volatility.

Fitch believes the private equity ownership of MeridianLink could
limit deleveraging. While significant synergy is achievable,
private equity ownership is likely to result in some level of
leverage on an ongoing basis to optimize return on equity. In the
near term, Fitch anticipates MeridianLink will focus on the
integration of CRIF for the next 12-24 months. Beyond the
integration period, Fitch expects large portions of FCF to be used
for acquisitions to further consolidate MeridianLink's market
position and for dividend payments to the owners.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case for the Issuer

  - Revenue growth in the low- to mid-single digits through Fitch's
ratings horizon driven primarily by organic growth;

  - EBITDA margin consistent with historical trends and realization
of planned cost reduction;

  - Capex in the low to mid 2% of revenue range, normalizing
approximately 1% of sales by FY2020;

  - FCF margin consistent with historical trends.

In estimating a distressed enterprise value (EV) for MeridianLink,
Fitch assumes that a distressed scenario could be driven by a
decline in MeridianLink's products due to greater competitive
intensity. Fitch assumes a going concern EBITDA that is
approximately 15% lower than the Dec. 31, 2017 pro forma LTM EBITDA
driven by a meaningful reduction in revenue. Fitch assumes a 7.0x
EV multiple in its recovery analysis. In the 21st edition of
Fitch's Bankruptcy Enterprise Values and Creditor Recoveries case
studies, Fitch notes nine past reorganizations in the Technology
sector with recovery multiples ranging from 2.6x to 10.8x. Of these
companies, only three were in the Software sector, Allen Systems
Group, Inc., Avaya, Inc. and Aspect Software Parent, Inc. and
received recovery multiples of 8.4x, 8.1x and 5.5x, respectively.
Fitch believes MeridianLink's operating profile supports a recovery
multiple in the middle of this range.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  - Fitch's expectation of forward total leverage sustaining below
5x;

  - Successful integration with CRIF including fully realizing
expected synergies to achieve projected EBITDA margins;

  - Revenue growth in the high-singe-digits, implying market share
gain through strong market position.

Developments that May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  - Fitch's expectation of forward total leverage sustaining above
7x;

  - Sustained negative revenue growth;

  - EBITDA and FCF margins sustaining below projected levels.

LIQUIDITY

Pro forma for the sponsor transaction and CRIF combination,
MeridianLink will have adequate liquidity of $46 million, comprised
of $11 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and a $35
million revolving credit facility (undrawn) maturing April 23rd,
2023. The company's liquidity profile is supported by solid EBITDA
and FCF generation.

Per the sponsor transaction, the company's new capital structure
will consist of the following:

  -- $35 million senior secured revolving credit facility (undrawn
at close) due 2023

  -- $315 million senior secured first lien term loan due 2025

  -- $125 million senior secured second lien term loan (privately
placed) due 2026

Fitch believes that the company has sufficient cash on hand to
handle all upcoming bank debt repayments in the near term.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned the following first-time ratings:

Project Angel Holdings, LLC

  -- Long-Term IDR 'B'; Outlook Stable;

  -- $35 million first lien secured revolving credit facility
'BB'/'RR1';

  -- $315 million first lien secured term loan 'BB'/'RR1;

Project Angel Intermediate Holdings, LLC

  -- Long-Term IDR 'B'.



PROJECT ANGEL: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned first time ratings to Project
Angel Holdings, LLC ("Project Angel") with a Corporate Family
Rating ("CFR") of B3 and a Probability of Default Rating ("PDR") of
B3-PD. Concurrently, Moody's assigned a B2 rating to the issuer's
proposed senior secured first lien credit facility, comprised of a
$315 million term loan and an undrawn $35 million revolver. The
proceeds of the new debt financing will be used to partially fund
the purchase of MeridianLink, Inc. ("MeridianLink") as well as its
competitor CRIF Lending Solutions ("CRIF") by Thoma Bravo, LLC
("Thoma Bravo"). Following the close of the transaction,
MeridianLink and CRIF will be combined as direct subsidiaries of
Project Angel (who will d/b/a MeridianLink). The ratings outlook is
stable.

Moody's assigned the following ratings:

Corporate Family Rating -- B3

Probability of Default Rating -- B3-PD

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility expiring 2023 -- B2
(LGD3)

Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan due 2025 -- B2 (LGD3)

Outlook is Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Project Angel's B3 CFR is constrained by the company's high LTM
debt leverage (excluding unrealized cost synergies) of more than 8x
(Moody's adjusted for operating leases) as well as its limited
scale and concentrated vertical market focus as a software provider
for banks, credit unions, mortgage lenders, and other financial
services providers. Potential integration risks associated with the
acquisition of CRIF could also create business disruptions while
upfront implementation costs meaningfully constrain deleveraging
efforts. These risks are partially offset by Project Angel's solid
presence as provider of SaaS-based solutions within its target
market of financial services clients, high revenue predictability
driven by historically strong retention rates, and a capital
structure supported by a meaningful equity cushion. The rating also
benefits from Project Angel's strong profitability margins and free
cash flow generation.

The B2 ratings for Project Angel's first lien bank debt reflect the
borrower's B3-PD PDR and a Loss Given Default ("LGD") assessment of
LGD3. The B2 first lien ratings are one notch higher than the CFR
and take into account the first lien bank debt's priority in the
collateral and senior ranking in the capital structure relative to
the company's $125 million second lien debt (unrated).

Project Angel's good liquidity is supported by the company's pro
forma cash balance of approximately $11 million following the
completion of the financing as well as Moody's expectation of free
cash flow generation approaching 5% of debt over the next 12
months. The company's liquidity is also bolstered by an undrawn $35
million revolving credit facility. While Project Angel's term loans
are not subject to financial covenants, the revolving credit
facility has a springing covenant based on a maximum net first lien
leverage ratio which the company should be comfortably in
compliance with over the next 12-18 months.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Project Angel
will generate mid-single digit organic revenue growth over the next
12 to 18 months. Sales gains should be principally driven by fees
related to transaction volume growth among the company's customers
associated with increased loan and account origination during this
period. Concurrently, the realization of cost synergies from the
CRIF integration should allow the company to generate healthy
EBITDA growth during this period, driving a contraction in leverage
to the high 6x level by the end of 2019.

The rating could be upgraded if Project Angel profitably expands
its scale and successfully integrates the CRIF purchase while
adhering to a conservative financial policy. These measures, in
conjunction with debt repayments that would reduce debt to EBITDA
(Moody's adjusted) to below 6.5x, would add upward ratings
pressure.

The rating could be downgraded if Project Angel were to experience
a weakening competitive position, free cash flow deficits on a
sustained basis, or the company maintains aggressive financial
policies that prevent meaningful deleveraging.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Software
Industry published in December 2015.

Project Angel, which is in the process of being acquired by Thoma
Bravo, is a leading provider of SaaS-based software solutions to
financial institutions to support loan and deposit account
origination and related workflow applications.


PROVIDENCE WIRELESS: Unsecureds to Get 100% Lump Sum Payment
------------------------------------------------------------
Providence Wireless, LLC, amended its Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization to provided that Allowed General Unsecured Claims,
classified in Class 2, totaling in the approximate amount of
$34,658.90, will receive a lump sum payment in the full amount of
its Allowed Claim.

The Debtor estimates that the aggregate amount of claims will be
approximately $189,379.66 and the Plan Sponsors will accordingly
make the Plan Sponsors Contribution to the Estate in an amount up
to $290,000.

This figure consists of the estimated aggregate amount of the
Allowed General Unsecured Claims, Allowed Settled Claims and
Allowed Insider Claims, plus an additional $100,000 in the event
the aggregate amount of these claims exceeds the Debtor's estimate.
Notwithstanding, the Plan Sponsors may increase the amount of the
Plan Sponsors Contribution at its sole discretion at any time up to
and including the Confirmation Hearing.

The Debtor's receipt of the Plan Sponsors Contribution, in an
amount that is mutually acceptable to the Debtor and Plan Sponsors,
is a condition precedent to this Plan.  The Plan will be deemed
null and void, and will have no effect, in the event the Plan
Sponsors Contribution is not received by the Debtor on or before
the Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Amended Plan is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-11940-124.pdf

                   About Providence Wireless

Providence Wireless, LLC, is a radiotelephone communication company
located in Alpharetta, Georgia.

Providence Wireless sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-11940) on Feb. 21,
2018.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of $1,000,001 to $10 million.

Judge Robert A. Mark presides over the case.  

The Debtor hired Shraiberg, Landau & Page, P.A. as its bankruptcy
counsel, and Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen PLLC as special
counsel.


Q&C PROPERTIES: Proposes Plan to Exit Chapter 11 Protection
-----------------------------------------------------------
Q&C Properties LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada its proposed plan to exit Chapter 11
protection.

Under the proposed plan of reorganization, creditors holding Class
2 unsecured claims are anticipated to receive a pro rata share of
Q&C's disposable income, without interest, within five years of the
effective date of the plan.  Class 2 is impaired and unsecured
creditors are entitled to vote on the plan.

The reorganized company will fund payments under the plan.  Claims
will be paid from the proceeds of the reorganized company's ongoing
business operations, according to its disclosure statement
explaining the plan.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-16663-104.pdf

                     About Q&C Properties

Founded in 2005, Q&C Properties, LLC, operates a car wash business
at 3265 S. Nellis Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada 89121.  The
company's gross revenue amounted to $937,437 in 2016 and $848,812
in 2015.  Q&C Properties is owned by Steven D. Rice (55%) and
Donald Rice (45%).

Q&C Properties filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
17-16663) on Dec. 14, 2017.  In the petition signed by Steven D.
Rice, its managing member, the Debtor disclosed $2.25 million in
assets and $4.90 million in liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge Laurel E. Davis.  Marjorie A. Guymon, Esq., at Goldsmith &
Guymon, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


RANDALL KEITH SMALL: Court Orders Law Firm to Disgorge $4,467
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Trustee and the United States of America on behalf of the
IRS filed motions to compel attorneys Neil Sader, Christopher
Cusack, and the Sader Law Firm to disgorge fees and expenses paid
to them in connection with the filing of Debtor Randall Keith
Small' chapter 11 bankruptcy case. Specifically, the UST and the
USA allege that the fees and expenses SLF incurred in filing the
case were not reasonable and did not benefit the estate. At the
initial hearing on the motions to disgorge, the Court directed SLF
to file an application for compensation so that the Court could
determine the reasonableness of the fees and expenses paid. Both
moving parties then objected to the application for compensation.
At the final hearing, all parties waived the right to present
evidence and agreed to submit the matter on the moving papers and
oral argument and to deem the respective exhibits attached to the
papers to be considered as evidence.

Upon review, Bankruptcy Judge Cynthia A. Norton denies the
application for compensation and grants the motions to disgorge.

The standards for determining the reasonableness of attorney
compensation in chapter 11 cases is well-established in the Eighth
Circuit. A bankruptcy court does not determine the reasonableness
of an attorney's compensation in hindsight. The Bankruptcy Code
requires only that the services in question had the reasonable
likelihood of benefitting the estate at the time they were
provided, not that they actually did provide a benefit. While it is
not necessary to have a successful reorganization in order for
debtor’s counsel to be awarded fees, fees may be denied when
counsel should have realized that reorganization was not feasible
and therefore services in that effort did not benefit the estate.
The attorney seeking compensation bears the burden of proving
entitlement to all fees and expenses requested.

Here, although the Court's inclination initially was to allow SLF
some time and expense reimbursement, the Court in good conscience
cannot do so on this record. The Court is deeply troubled that an
experienced and well-respected lawyer charging $335/hour failed in
the most basic of due diligence -- to investigate the impact of
filing bankruptcy on the Debtor's criminal case. Had any SLF
attorney taken the few minutes needed to review the plea agreement
and the criminal case, or to have called the Debtor's criminal
counsel, the U.S. Attorney or the IRS, he would have realized
immediately that filing any bankruptcy -- but particularly an
individual chapter 11 bankruptcy -- was patently in bad faith,
given the fiduciary duties chapter 11 imposes on a debtor on behalf
of the creditors and the estate.

The time records speak for themselves: there was no attempt to
seriously evaluate the feasibility of this debtor filing
bankruptcy. Rather, the case smacks of a rush to get paid out of a
substantial retainer, and to sort out any damage to the Debtor, the
creditors, or the estate later, by simply dismissing.

The Court cannot condone this failure, as it cannot condone the
inaccuracies in the fee disclosures. The inaccuracies in the
disclosures alone are sufficient to require complete disgorgement.
SLF's failure to evaluate the filing, its failure to ensure
accurate fee disclosures, and its failure to accept responsibility
for this disaster are each alone valid reasons to grant the motions
to disgorge.

The Court, therefore, orders SLF to disgorge the sum of $4,467.75
for the benefit of the USA forthwith and in accordance with any
orders of the District Court; and that SLF is to hold the remaining
funds in trust pending any further orders of the District Court.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 7,
2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/mowb18-40362-11-47.pdf

Randall Keith Small filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 18-40362) on Feb. 12, 2018, and is
represented by Christopher J. Cusack, Esq. of  Sader Law Firm, LLC.


RELATIVITY FASHION: Metz Claims vs CEO Barred by Plan Releases
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ryan C. Kavanaugh, CEO of Debtor Relativity Fashion, LLC, contends
that the release and injunction provisions of Relativity Fashion
and affiliates' confirmed plan of reorganization and the Court's
confirmation order bar certain claims made against him by Carey
Metz in a post-confirmation lawsuit that was filed in California.
Metz opposes the requested relief on various grounds. Judge Michael
E. Wiles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York granted Kavanaugh's motion as to certain of the claims
asserted in the California litigation but denied as to others.

Sixteen months after the Debtor's Plan became effective, Metz
commenced an action in the California Superior Court, on August 17,
2017. Metz alleges that he made a $2 million loan to the Debtors,
prior to the Debtors' bankruptcy filings, in reliance on inaccurate
and fraudulent statements made by Kavanaugh about the Debtors'
financial condition. Metz also alleged that Kavanaugh provided an
oral guaranty of the purported loan. The State Court Action
includes the following causes of action: fraudulent inducement by
intentional misrepresentation; breach of oral contract; breach of
the covenant of good faith and fair dealing;  false promise;
unjust enrichment; and negligent misrepresentation.

Kavanaugh sought to dismiss the State Court Action, arguing that
Metz's claims were barred by a release contained in a separate
economic participation agreement, dated Feb. 1, 2016, as well as by
releases in the Plan and Confirmation Order. Kavanaugh's
contentions regarding the economic participation agreement required
arbitration, and the State Court Action was stayed and the matter
was referred to arbitration for that purpose.

On March 27, 2018, Kavanaugh filed an enforcement motion arguing
that some of Metz's claims against him fall within the release and
injunction provisions of the Debtors' confirmed Plan and the
Confirmation Order. The parties do not dispute this Court's
authority to interpret and to enforce its prior Confirmation Order,
though they disagree as to the interpretation of that Order.

Kavanaugh sought entry of an order enforcing the terms of the Plan
and Confirmation Order and enjoining Metz from continuing any
released claim. He acknowledged that there is an exception in the
releases for claims based on a finding of gross negligence or
fraud, but he argued that if Metz pursues claims of gross
negligence or fraud, and fails to obtain a court finding in his
favor, Metz should then be held in contempt of the Court's
Confirmation Order. Kavanaugh further moved for a reimbursement of
costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees.

Metz argued that the releases approved in the Confirmation Order
only bind creditors who consented to them, and that "[t]here is no
evidence that Metz ever provided this consent." Alternatively, even
if the release and injunction provisions bind Metz, he argued that
all of the causes of action in the State Court Action are excepted
from those provisions by their terms, which provide a carve-out for
causes of action based on actions of "gross negligence" or "willful
misconduct," including fraud. Metz argued, essentially, that he
should be permitted to pursue claims based on negligence (as well
as claims alleging fraud) so long as some portion of the complaint
contends that the same underlying course of conduct constituted
“fraud." Finally, Metz argued that he is not liable for
reimbursement of costs and expenses merely for pursuing actions
which he maintains were asserted in good faith.

In this particular case, the Court concludes that Mr. Kavanaugh has
the better argument and that the release provisions are not
ambiguous.

First, there are other provisions in the Plan in which releases are
made applicable to certain described entities only in their
designated capacities as such. For example, the definition of
"Released Parties" includes the "Representatives" of the various
described entities. The definition of "Representatives" includes
agents, attorneys, and others, but "solely in such capacity." No
similar limitation applies to the references to the members of the
boards of managers in the definition of "Released Parties."
Similarly, the "Initial DIP Lenders" are included among the
Released Parties, but the definition of "Initial DIP Lenders"
includes the entities to who made certain loans "solely in such
capacity." The inclusion of limiting "capacity" language as to some
released parties, but the failure to include similar limitations as
to the members of the boards of managers, supports the conclusion
that the omission of such a limitation as to the managers was
deliberate.

Next, it must be noted that the only argument that Metz made in
opposition to the Enforcement Motion was that the Court allegedly
had only approved releases by voting creditors and that Metz had
not submitted a ballot. He did not argue in his initial papers that
the releases were limited to claims that he might own in his
capacity as a member of the boards of managers of the Debtors, and
apparently did not believe that the releases had such a limited
scope. The Court raised the question as to whether, as a matter of
law, the reference to "managers" in the releases should necessarily
be limited to claims by or against persons in those capacities, and
the Court is satisfied that there is no such automatic limitation
as to the scope of a release. Given Metz's prior contentions, there
is no credible argument that he ever had a contrary view as to the
effect of the release, or that there is any legitimate ambiguity in
the release provision or as to the parties’ intent.

The Court, however, declines to award costs, expenses or attorneys'
fees in connection with the Enforcement Motion. It is plain that
the main claims against Kavanaugh in the State Court Action are
based on allegations of willful misconduct. Metz and his counsel
were wrong in adding claims for negligence, but given all the
circumstances, their actions are not so egregious as to warrant
sanctions.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated June 7,
2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb15-11989-2336.pdf

Counsel to Ryan Kavanaugh:

     Patrick T. Collins, Esq.
     Kristina M. Wesch, Esq.
     FARRELL FRITZ P.C.
     400 RXR Plaza
     Uniondale, New York 11556
     pcollins@farrellfritz.com
     kwesch@farrellfritz.com

Counsel to Carey Metz:

     Matthew B. Stein, Esq.
     KASOWITZ BENSON TORRES LLP
     1633 Broadway
     New York, New York 10019
     mstein@kasowitz.com

                    About Relativity Fashion

Relativity -- http://relativitymedia.com/-- is a next-generation
global media company engaged in multiple aspects of content
production and distribution, including movies, television, sports,
digital and music.  More than just a collection of
entertainment-related businesses, Relativity is a content engine
with the ability to leverage each of these business units,
independently and together, to create content across all mediums,
giving consumers what they want, when they want it.

Relativity Studios, the Company's largest division, has produced,
distributed or structured financing for more than 200 motion
pictures, generating more than $17 billion in worldwide box-office
revenue and earning 60 Oscar nominations.  Relativity's films
include Oculus, Safe Haven, Act of Valor, Immortals, Limitless, and
The Fighter.

Relativity Media LLC and its affiliates, including Relativity
Fashion, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-11989) on July 30, 2015.  The
case is assigned to Judge Michael E. Wiles.

The Debtors are represented by Craig A. Wolfe, Esq., Malani J.
Cademartori, Esq., and Blanka K. Wolfe, Esq., at Sheppard Mullin
Richter & Hampton LLP, in New York; and Richard L. Wynne, Esq.,
Bennett L. Spiegel, Esq., and Lori Sinanyan, Esq., at Jones Day, in
New York.

Brian Kushner of FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as chief
restructuring officer and crisis and turnaround manager.  Luke
Schaeffer of FTI Consulting, Inc., serves as deputy CRO.

Blackstone Advisory Partners L.P. serves as the Debtors' investment
banker.  The team is led by Timothy Coleman, Senior Managing
Director, CJ Brown, Senior Managing Director, Paul Sheaffer, Vice
President, and Joseph Goldschmid, Associate.

The Debtors' noticing and claims agent is Donlin, Recano & Company,
Inc.

                          *     *     *

An investor group composed of Anchorage Capital Group, L.L.C.,
Falcon Investment Advisors, LLC and Luxor Capital Group, LP on Oct.
21, 2015, completed its purchase of the assets of Relativity
Television.

After selling their TV business, the Debtors and CEO Ryan C.
Kavanaugh filed a proposed plan of reorganization that will allow
the Debtors to reorganize their non-TV business units with a
substantially de-levered balance sheet utilizing new equity
investments and new financing.

Jim Cantelupe, of Summit Trail Advisors, LLC, assisted the Debtors
in raising up to $100 million of new equity to fund the Plan.

The Bankruptcy Court on Feb. 8, 2016, confirmed the Debtors' Fourth
Amended Plan.  A copy of the Fourth Amended Plan is available at
http://is.gd/wZI1gd


RICHARD CASTRONOVA: Has $400K Offer for West Milford Property
-------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Castronova asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of New Jersey to authorize the sale of the real property located at
1560 Union Valley Road, West Milford, New Jersey to West Milford
Postal Properties, LLC, for $400,000, subject to higher or better
offers.

A hearing on the Motion is set for June 27, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

The Debtor's case was commenced on the eve of a foreclosure sale
concerning real property owned jointly located at 1612 Union Valley
Road, West Milford, New Jersey.  He also holds the Property, in
which he plans on selling.

Prior to the filing of the case, the Debtor and his co-owners of
the Property had a contract to sell to the Buyer.  The Property is
land only, which is subject to a land-lease.  On the land itself,
is a post office building in which any improvements and/or
buildings are owned by the Buyer.  Thus, the Property is not
marketable because it is subject to the land-lease with the Buyer.
Furthermore, the Debtor only has a 25% interest in the Property, as
it is co-owned.

The Property may be encumbered by certain other liens as set forth
in detail in the title report.  The liens that may encumber the
Property include:

     a. Any and all unpaid property taxes in amount of $76,559

     b. Judgments docketed with the Superior Court of New Jersey
("Judgment Creditors"):

          i. Christine Castronova - Judgment No.: J-078174-2012 -
$4,314,600 (Creditor has agreed to a release).

         ii. Merrick Bahar, Scott Garrett  - Judgment No.:
J-234650-2013 - $1,067,636 (Creditor has agreed to a release for
payment of $400,000).

        iii. Damiano Law Offices - Judgment No.: J-110161-2014 -
$17,105 (Creditor has agreed to a partial release for $2,500, of
which the Buyer will be remitting payment).

         iv. Michael Siesta – Judgment No.: J-150029-2015 -
$31,499 (Creditor has agreed to a partial release for $7,500 for
both J-150029-15 and J-162697-15, of which the Buyer will be
payment).

          v. NJ Div. of Taxation – Judgment No.: DJ-160204-2006 -
$154,595 (the Debtor is attempting to obtain a voluntary release
from the State of New Jersey).

         vi. NJ Div. of Taxation – Judgment No.: DJ-060592-2017 -
$115,783 (the Debtor is attempting to obtain a voluntary release
from the State of New Jersey).

        vii. NJ Div. of Taxation - Judgment No.: DJ-164985-2017 -
$123,703 (the Debtor is attempting to obtain a voluntary release
from the State of New Jersey).

The pertinent terms of the Purchase Agreement are:

     a. The Purchase Agreement provides for a $400,000 purchase
price with a deposit of $40,000, with the balance paid at closing.
The deposit will be held by the attorney for the Buyer, Dennis J.
Francis, Esq., ("Escrow Agent"), which deposit will be maintained
in an Attorney Trust Account.  The deposit will be maintained by
the Escrow Agent in an Attorney Trust Account until the earlier of:
(1) Closing of title, at which time the deposit will be released
and paid over to Scott Garrett and Merrick Baha on behalf of the
seller; or (2) the exercise of a permitted right of cancellation or
termination under this Agreement by teh Buyer, at which time the
deposit will be released and paid over to the Buyer.

     b. The closing is anticipated to occur within 30 days of
Bankruptcy Court approval.

     c. The performance of Purchaser is contingent on obtaining of
a mortgage commitment in the amount of $360,000.

     d. Any outstanding property taxes in relation to the Property
are now the responsibility of the Buyer.

     e. Buyer has agreed to remit payment to Damiano Law Offices in
the amount of $2,500 as well as Michael Siesta in the amount of
$7,500 in order for the Seller to obtain a partial release.  The
Buyer is also responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes,
which total over 78,000.  This effectively makes the purchase price
approximately $488,000.

     f. The sale is "as is, where is," and free and clear of
interests, claims liens and encumbrances.

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/Richard_Castronova_18_Sales.pdf

The Debtor respectfully asks that real estate counsel be paid from
the proceeds of sale.  An application to retain and approve Joseph
Petriello as Real Estate Counsel will be and or is already filed.

The Debtor asserts that given the goal by the parties in the case
to sell the Property and bring the case to conclusion in the short
term, there is cause to waive the stay and the Debtor's request
that upon approval of the sale, the 14-day period pursuant to Rule
6004(h) be waived by the Court.

The Purchaser:

          WEST MILFORD POSTAL PROPERTIES, LLC
          7 Prices Switch Road
          Vernon, NJ 07462

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Dennis J. Francis, Esq.
          37 Liberty St., Suite 1
          Little Ferry, NJ 07643

Proposed Counsel for Debtor:

          John J. Scura III, Esq.
          SCURA, WIGFIELD, HEYER,
          STEVENS & CAMMAROTA, LLP
          1599 Hamburg Turnpike
          Wayne, NJ 07470
          Telephone: (973) 696-8391
          Facsimile: (973) 696-8671
          E-mail: jscura@scuramealey.com

Richard Castronova sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 18-18894) on May 1, 2018.  The Debtor tapped John J. Scura,
III, Esq., at Scura, Wigfield, Heyer & Stevens, LLP, as counsel.


RIEDESEL ENGINEERING: Selling Interest in 2011 Ford F-150 for $11K
------------------------------------------------------------------
Riedesel Engineering, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Idaho to authorize the sale of interest in a 2011 Ford
F-150 XL SuperCab 4WD located at 850 E. Franklin Rd. Ste. 408A,
Meridian, Idaho to Teresa Burke-Ellet for $11,247, subject to
higher and better offers.

The sale of the Property will take place on June 27, 2018, at 9:00
a.m. (MDT) at the Debtor's place of business at 850 E. Franklin Rd.
Ste. 408A Meridian, Idaho.  The Property will be sold to the
highest bidder for not less than a gross purchase price of $11,247.


The Debtor has received a bid from the Buyer, the Secretary of the
Debtor, in the amount of $11,247.  It expects the Buyer will
purchase the vehicle for $11,247, subject to overbid and Court
approval.

The Debtor believes that the fair market value of the Property is
approximately equal to the sale price, based on the Kelly Blue Book
and Nada Guide.  The closing will be held at the convenience of the
parties or as soon after Court approval as possible.

The opening bid price will be the Buyer's bid of $11,247.  Any
competing bids will start at $11,300.  The minimum bid increments
will be $100.  The bidders may bid in increments of more than $100
if desired.

To participate in the auction, an overbidder must submit to the
Debtor's counsel, at least prior to the start of the auction,
certified funds in the amount of $2,000, payable to "Riedesel
Engineering, Inc."  Should the overbidder be the winning bidder,
these funds will be retained by the Debtor as a nonrefundable
deposit for application against the purchase price at the closing,
or returned to the overbidder if the Court does not approve the
sale.  The certified funds of the unsuccessful bidders will be
refunded to those parties after the auction.

The sale with all valid interests in the property to attach to the
sale proceeds.  First Federal Savings Bank holds a lien in the sum
of $11,247 encumbering the personal property to be sold.  The
Trustee has asked the Court to allow payment at closing of the
uncontested liens and administrative expenses associated with the
sale.

The property will be sold free and clear of all liens, claims, and
encumbrances.  Actual deductions for loan payoff may vary depending
on the actual closing date.  There are no other known existing
liens to be paid by the sale proceeds and any such liens would be
subject to a bonafide dispute.

The proceeds of the sale will pay off the lien of First Federal
Savings Bank.  Any additional net proceeds will be retained by the
estate.

The Debtor believes that the proposed sale is in the best interest
of the estate and creditors.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date of
Notice service.

The Debtor asks the Court to order that the sale will be effective
immediately, and to waive the 14-day stay imposed by Fed. R. Bankr.
P. 6004(h).

                 About Riedesel Engineering Inc.

Riedesel Engineering, Inc. -- http://www.riedeseleng.com--  
provides engineering services for communities throughout the
Northwest.  It is a multi-disciplined engineering firm
specializing
in transportation, municipal, airport, land survey, land
development and construction services.  The company has offices in
Lewiston, Meridian and Twin Falls.

Riedesel Engineering sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 18-00288) on March 15,
2018.

In the petition signed by Martin G. Gergen, president, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Jim D. Pappas presides over the case.


ROGERS & SON: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 26
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
is set to hold a hearing on July 26 to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Rogers & Son Lawn Care &
Landscaping LLC.

The hearing will be held at 10:00 a.m., at The Ronald Reagan
Federal Building, Bankruptcy Courtroom.

The court had earlier approved Rogers & Son's disclosure statement,
allowing the company to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Robert Opel, II on May 24, set a June 28
deadline for creditors to file their objections and submit ballots
of acceptance or rejection of the plan.

                  About Rogers & Son Lawn Care

Rogers & Son Lawn Care & Landscaping, LLC, doing business as
Affordable Tree Services, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-00367) on Feb. 1, 2017.  In the
petition signed by its sole member, Norman R. Rogers, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities ranging from $100,000 to
$500,000.

Judge Robert N. Opel, II presides over the case.  Lawrence V.
Young, Esq., at CGA Law Firm, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

The Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization on
February 16, 2018.


SAM MEYERS: Hollenbach Buying Louisville Property for $1.2M
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sam Meyers, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Kentucky to authorize the sale of the real property
known as 3400 Bashford Avenue Court, Louisville, Kentucky, together
with all easements, privileges, permits, licenses, and
appurtenances of any kind whatsoever related to the real property;
and all fixtures, furnishings, appliances, equipment, and other
types of items of personal property affixed to the improvements on,
and/or located on and used in connection with the use or
maintenance of the real property, to John P. Hollenbach, Sr. or his
assigns for $1.2 million.

Prior to the filing of its petition, the Debtor negotiated the
liquidation of its business with Citizens Union Bank of
Shelbyville, Inc., the Debtor has worked to reorganize outside of
bankruptcy and close the lower performing locations of its Dry
Cleaners.  In addition, it intends to sell its Corporate Office and
downsize significantly continuing to reduce its overhead and
improve profitability and sell the remaining assets to a company
controlled by the Debtor's management.

The Debtor has also identified a purchaser for its remaining assets
and will be filing a motion to sell to authorize the transaction
free and clear of liens.

The parties have entered into Asset Purchase Agreement for the said
sale.  The APA contemplates a sale of the Debtor's real property --
but not its operations -- to the Purchaser.  The Debtor believes
the proposed sale is the best way to preserve the value of its
business and is in the best interest of its estate and creditors.
Accordingly, it asks approval of the APA.

Pursuant to the APA, the Debtor will sell the Property, free and
clear of all claims.  The contingencies to the sale are (i) the
Buyer has the right to terminate the contract until 6:00 p.m. on
May 23, 2018; and (ii) the Seller or its assignee will lease a
portion of the Property from Purchaser or its assignee with rent
payable monthly at market rate in an amount and lease term to be
agreed upon by the parties.

The Property was marketed for sale by Stephen C. Gault & Company
for several months, at a listing price of $1,950,000.  The listing
with the broker has since expired.  The Debtor did not receive any
other offers to purchase the property, though other parties
expressed interest and performed various levels of due diligence.

There are no relationships among the Purchaser and his insiders and
the Debtor and its insiders.  The relationships or connections that
the Debtor or its insiders will have with the Purchaser after the
sale are as follows: The Debtor anticipates asking Court approval
to sell the remainder of its assets to a company controlled by some
of its insiders, which company will continue to occupy a portion of
the Property following the sale to the Purchaser pursuant to a
lease, which has not been finalized.  It will not have any further
operations following the sale.

Other than the Purchaser, no purchaser willing to execute a
definitive purchase agreement has emerged during the course of
several months of pre-petition marketing, but the Debtor has
received interest from other potential purchasers.  The Debtor has
determined the proposed sale to the Potential Purchaser is the one
most likely to maximize the realizable value of the Property for
the benefit of the Debtor's estate and creditors and other
interested parties.

A copy of the APA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Sam_Meyers_Inc_19_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

          John P. Hollenbach, Sr.
          P.O. Box 7368
          Louisville, KY 40257

                      About Sam Meyers Inc.

Sam Meyers, Inc. -- http://sammeyers.com-- is a wholesale supplier
of men's formal wear and accessories.  It also owns and operates a
dry cleaning business in the Midwest.  In addition to its
Louisville locations, Sam Meyers owns a store in Nashville,
Tennessee, that specializes in costume rentals and sales in
addition to formal wear; a tuxedo store in Evansville, Indiana; and
a satellite warehouse in Boston, Massachusetts.  Sam Meyers' main
warehouse is located in Louisville.

Sam Meyers sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 18-31559) on May 17, 2018.  In the
petition signed by James P. Corbett, president, the Debtor
disclosed $1.8 million in assets and $2.91 million in liabilities.
Judge Alan C. Stout presides over the case.  KAPLAN JOHNSON ABATE &
BIRD LLP is the Debtor's counsel.


SANCILIO PHARMACEUTICALS: Taps Greenberg Traurig as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sancilio Pharmaceuticals Company, Inc., seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire
Greenberg Traurig, LLP as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the company and its affiliates regarding their
duties under the Bankruptcy Code; assist in any disposition of the
Debtors' assets; negotiate with creditors; assist in the
preparation of a plan of reorganization; and provide other legal
services related to their Chapter 11 cases.

The firm's hourly rates range from $337 to $1,111 for shareholders;
$297 to $1,264 for of counsel; $108 to $742 for associates; and $31
to $387 for legal assistants and paralegals.

The current discounted hourly rates for the principal attorneys
proposed to represent the Debtors are:

         Dennis Meloro       $850
         Paul Keenan Jr.     $765
         John Dodd           $535
         Sara Hoffman        $517

In the one year prior to the petition date, Greenberg Traurig
received payments from the Debtors in the amount of $943,228.  Of
that amount, $515,000 in advanced payment retainers was received in
the 90 days prior to the petition date.

Greenberg Traurig is a "disinterested person" as defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

         Paul Keenan Jr.
         Greenberg Traurig, LLP
         333 SE 2nd Avenue, Suite 4400
         Miami, FL 33131
         E-mail: keenanp@gtlaw.com
         Direct: +1 305.579.0805
         Tel: +1 305.579.0500
         Fax: +1 305.579.0717

                 About Sancilio Pharmaceuticals

Headquartered in Riviera Beach, Florida, Sancilio --
https://www.sancilio.com/ -- is a private pharmaceutical
development and manufacturing company.

Sancilio Pharmaceuticals Company, Inc., along with affiliates
Sancilio & Company, Inc., and Blue Palm Advertising Agency, LLC,
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-11333) on June 6, 2018.

Sancilio Pharmaceuticals estimated $10 million to $50 million in
assets and liabilities.

The Hon. Christopher S. Sontchi is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Greenberg Traurig, LLP, as counsel; MCA
Financial Group, LTD., as financial advisor; and JND Corporate
Restructuring as claims agent.


SHAMROCK CREEK: Taps Genova & Malin as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Shamrock Creek LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York to hire Genova & Malin as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; take necessary actions to void liens against
property; and provide other legal services related to its Chapter
11 case.

Michelle Trier, Esq., a partner at Genova & Malin, disclosed in a
court filing that her firm is a "disinterested person" as defined
in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Andrea B. Malin, Esq.
     Michelle L. Trier, Esq.
     Genova & Malin
     1136 Route 9
     Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
     Phone: (845) 298-1600
     Fax: 845-298-1265

                       About Shamrock Creek

Shamrock Creek LLC is a privately-held distributor of bulk,
natural, well and untreated water in New Windsor, New York.

Shamrock Creek sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-35850) on May 23, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Shelley Gray, president, the Debtor estimated
assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million.  Judge Cecelia G. Morris presides over the case.
Genova & Malin is the Debtor's counsel.




SHARING ECONOMY: Extends Exclusivity Pact with ECrent by 18 Months
------------------------------------------------------------------
Sharing Economy International Inc. and ECrent Capital Holdings
Limited entered into an Amendment No.3 to Exclusivity Agreement on
June 20, 2018, amending the Exclusivity Agreement dated June 11,
2017 by and between the Company and ECrent, the terms of which
became effective on the same day.  Pursuant to the Amendment, the
Company and ECrent agreed to extend the exclusivity period under
the Exclusivity Agreement to a period of 18 months commencing from
June 20, 2018.

The Parties had agreed to engage in exclusive discussion regarding
(a) a potential acquisition by Sharing Economy of ECrent and/or any
of its subsidiaries or otherwise all or part of the Business,
and/or (b) potential business cooperation arrangements between the
Company and ECrent during the period commencing on June 20, 2018
and ending on the date that is 18 months after June 20.  ECrent
agrees that, without the prior written consent of SEII, during the
Exclusive Period, neither ECrent nor its agents, representatives or
advisors will contact, discuss or negotiate with any third party
(other than the license agreements entered into between ECrent and
Sharing Economy Investment Limited dated May 8 and 24, 2018 and
June 13, 2018 respectively and those with SEII's authorization)
with respect to (i) any transaction relating to the sale,
acquisition, exchange, pledge, or transfer of any securities of
ECrent and/or its subsidiaries; (ii) any transaction relating to
the sale of all or part of the Business; (iii) any business
cooperation; or (iv) any other matters that may adversely affect
the Potential Transaction or the Discussion.

                     About Sharing Economy

Headquartered in Jiangsu Province, China, Sharing Economy
International Inc. -- http://www.seii.com/-- designs, manufactures
and distributes a line of proprietary high and low temperature
dyeing and finishing machinery to the textile industry.  The
Company's latest business initiatives are focused on targeting the
technology and global sharing economy markets by developing online
platforms and rental business partnerships that will drive the
global development of sharing through economical rental business
models.  Moreover, the Company will actively pursue blockchain
technology in its existing and to-be-acquired business, enabling
the general public to realize the beauty of resource sharing.  

RBSM LLP's audit opinion included in the company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 contains a going concern
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company had a loss from
continuing operations for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 and expects
continuing future losses, and has stated that substantial doubt
exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
RBSM has served as the Company's auditor since 2012.

Sharing Economy incurred a net loss of $12.92 million in 2017 and a
net loss of $11.67 million in 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, the
company had $76.73 million in total assets, $9.05 million in total
liabilities and $67.67 million in total stockholders' equity.


SOUTHERN DESIGN: Plan Payments to be Funded by Sale or Refinancing
------------------------------------------------------------------
Southern Design Group, Inc., filed a plan of reorganization and
accompanying disclosure statement anticipating plan confirmation in
July 2018, and placing the Effective Date of the Plan no later than
August 2019.

General unsecured claims totaling $128,765.00 will be paid upon
refinancing or sale of the Debtor's two sets of properties for
residential development at 3873 Thomas Cross Road Sevierville,
Tennessee, and in the wooded forest subdivision off of Gamble Drive
in Heiskell, Tennessee.

Payments under the Plan are dependent upon the Debtor being able to
obtain refinancing for a development within the six months
following confirmation or sale of the property for development
within a six-month period subsequent to the initial period.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/tneb16-51628-56.pdf

                     About Southern Design

Southern Design Group, Inc., holds two sets of properties for
residential development.  The real properties include 82.77 acres
of real property at 3873 Thomas Cross Road Sevierville, Tennessee
and 3 lots of real property located in the wooded forest
subdivision off of Gamble Drive in Heiskell, Tennessee.

Southern Design Group sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No. 16-51628) on Nov. 3,
2016.  In the petition signed by Billy P. Evans, president, the
Debtor disclosed $1.10 million in assets and $1.75 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Marcia Phillips Parsons is the case judge.
HODGES, DOUGHTY & CARSON, PLLC is the Debtor's counsel.


SPRING TREE: DOJ Watchdog Seeks Approval of M. Smith as Trustee
---------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Trustee for Region 21 asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Georgia to approve the
appointment of Mark A. Smith as Chapter 11 Trustee for Spring Tree
Lending, LLC.

Counsel for the Applicant has consulted with the following
parties-in-interest regarding the appointment of the Trustee:
George Geeslin, counsel for the Debtor; Erich Durlacher, counsel
for American Credit Acceptance, LLC; and Leslie Pineyro, counsel
for Pacific Island Equity Corporation.

Mr. Smith may be reached at:

     Mark A. Smith
     Vantage Point Advisory, Inc.
     5565 Glenridge Connector, Suite 200
     Atlanta, GA 30342
     Tel: (404) 643-8410
     Email: mark.smith@vantagepointadvisory.com

                     About Spring Tree Lending

Spring Tree Lending, LLC, engages in buying and servicing non-prime
auto loans from auto dealers and lenders.  The company was founded
in 2015 and is based in Atlanta, Georgia.

On March 28, 2018, creditor Pacific Island Equity Corporation filed
an involuntary proceedings against Spring Tree Lending (Bank. N.D.
Ga. Case No. 18-55171).

The case is assigned to Hon. Barbara Ellis-Monro.  

The Debtor hired George M. Geeslin, Esq., as counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


STATESBORO LIFE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for July 17
-------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Georgia is
set to hold a hearing on July 17, at 2:30 p.m., to consider
approval of the disclosure statement, which explains the Chapter 11
plan for Statesboro Life Restaurant Group, Inc.

Objections to the disclosure statement are due by June 27.

              About Statesboro Life Restaurant Group

Based in Greensboro, Georgia, Statesboro Life Restaurant Group,
Inc. is a single asset real estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
101(51B)) debtor.  Its principal place of business is located at
6319 Bank Dairy Road, in Statesboro, Georgia. The company was
founded in 2010.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Case No. 17-60521) on Dec. 1, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Christian Bennett, owner and stockholder.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $634,725 in assets
and $1.34 million in liabilities.

Judge Edward J Coleman III presides over the case.  The Debtor
tapped Merrill & Stone, LLC as its legal counsel.


STINAR HG: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on July 18
-------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota is set to
hold a hearing on July 18 to consider approval of the Chapter 11
plans proposed by Stinar HG, Inc. and Oakridge Holdings, Inc.

The hearing will be held at 2:30 p.m., at Courtroom 8.

The court had earlier approved the companies' disclosure
statements, allowing them to start soliciting votes from creditors.


The order, signed by Judge Kathleen Sanberg on June 7, required
voting creditors to submit ballots of acceptance or rejection of
the plan five days prior to the July 18 hearing.

Seven days prior to the hearing is the last day to timely deliver
an objection, and 10 days prior to the hearing is the last day to
timely mail an objection.  The objection must be filed not later
than one day after service.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement for
Oakridge's Plan is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb17-31670-113.pdf

                    About Stinar HG & Oakrdige

Stinar HG, Inc., doing business as The Stinar Corporation, is a
Minnesota-based company that manufactures ground support equipment
for the aviation industry.  The late Frank Stinar founded Stinar
Corp. in 1946.  Stinar's products are used to load, service, and
maintain all types of aircraft for both government and commercial
applications.  The company's corporate headquarters and its
40,000-square foot manufacturing facility are in Eagan, Minnesota.

On June 29, 1998, Oakridge Holdings, Inc. (OTCMKTS:OKRGQ), a
publicly held Minnesota-based company, became the new owner of
Stinar.  Currently, Stinar is the only asset of Oakridge Holdings.

The largest shareholder of Oakridge Holdings is Robert Harvey who
holds approximately 21% of the outstanding shares.

Oakridge Holdings and operating unit Stinar HG filed bankruptcy
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Minn. Case Nos. 17-31669 and
17-31670, respectively) on May 22, 2017. Robert C. Harvey, CEO and
president, signed the petitions.

On May 26, 2017, the Court entered an Order allowing the joint
administration of these Chapter 11 cases under Bankr. D. Minn. Case
No. 17-31670.

At the time of filing, debtor Oakridge Holdings disclosed total
assets of $990,237 and total liabilities of $2.17 million, while
debtor Stinar HG disclosed total assets of $8.22 million and total
liabilities of $2.91 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge Kathleen H Sanberg.

The Debtors are represented by Kenneth Edstrom, Esq., at Sapientia
Law Group.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtors' cases.


STONE PROJECTS: Initial Funds for Plan Distribution Cut to $6.5K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Stone Projects, LLC, amended its plan of reorganization to reduce
the initial funds required to be distributed under the Plan to
$6,535 from $13,907 under the original Plan.

The initial funds will be distributed to U.S. Trustee ($975.00),
MDOR ($560.00), and initial dividend to general unsecured creditors
($5,000.00).

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-11877-124.pdf

                      About Stone Projects

Based in Woburn, Massachusetts, Stone Projects, LLC, designs,
fabricates and installs stone surfaces for residential and
commercial customers throughout the Greater Boston area.

Stone Projects filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 17-11877) on May 19, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Leonardo C. Chantre, manager, the Debtor estimated $100,000 to
$500,000 in assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.  The
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel is Nina M. Parker, Esq., at Parker &
Associates.

No request for the appointment of a trustee or examiner has been
sought in the proceeding, and no committee has been appointed or
designated.


SUNSET PARTNERS: Court Denies C. Brown Bid to Enjoin Cantina Sale
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts entered an order denying the Motion to Intervene
and Enjoin or Restrain the Prospective Sale of Sunset Cantina filed
by Christopher Brown.

Upon consideration of, among other things, the Trustee's Motion to
Sell Personal Property of the Estate Free and Clear of Liens and
Interests; the Notice of Intended Private Sale of Property,
Solicitation of Counteroffers, Deadlines for Submitting Objections
and Higher Offer and Hearing Date; the Court's Order dated Feb. 15,
2018 authorizing the sale of personal property to Brown and Brown
Ribbon Entertainment, LLC; the Court's "Order Authorizing Trustee
to Sell Debtor Sunset Partners, Inc.'s Sunset Cantina Assets Free
and Clear of Liens, Claims and Encumbrances," dated March 8, 2018,
the Court finds that the motion to intervene is an improper
pleading.

Even if the Court were to overlook that procedural infirmity, as
well as Brown's standing to enjoin the sale to the backup bidder,
the Court concludes that Brown has failed to address, let alone
sustain, the burden of establishing the required elements to obtain
a preliminary injunction. Brown, who appears only to seek the
injunction on his own behalf and not on behalf of Brown Ribbon, has
not demonstrated either a likelihood of success on the merits or
irreparable harm, particularly where the Buyer exercised its remedy
to notify the Trustee of its intention to not to move forward with
the sale owing to an inability to satisfy the contingency of
negotiating an acceptable lease.

The Court, having reviewed the submissions of Brown and the Trustee
can find no reference whatsoever to the sale of an entertainment
license in either the Trustee's Sale Motion or the Notice of
Intended Private Sale and no reference to an entertainment license
in the Court's March 8, 2018 order authorizing the sale to the
Buyer.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum dated June 8, 2018 is
available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-12178-250.pdf

                  About Sunset Partners

Sunset Partners, Inc., is a Massachusetts corporation that owns and
operates two Boston area restaurants: the Sunset Grill & Tap
located at 130 Brighton Avenue, Allston, MA; and, the Sunset
Cantina located at 916 Commonwealth Avenue, Brookline, MA.
Affiliate Bema Restaurant Corporation, d/b/a Patron's, is a
Massachusetts corporation that owns and operates a Boston area
restaurant called Patrons, which is located at 138 Brighton Avenue,
Allston, Massachusetts.

Sunset Partners filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 17-12178) on June 7, 2017, disclosing $1.05
million in total assets and $5.67 million in total liabilities.  

Bema Restaurant Corporation filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 17-12434) on June 29, 2017, disclosing $1.12 million
in assets and $4.45 million in liabilities.

The cases are jointly administered and assigned to Judge Joan N.
Feeney.

David B. Madoff, Esq., and Steffani Pelton Nicholson, Esq., at
Madoff & Khoury LLP, served as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors.
Verdolino & Lowey, P.C., served as the Debtors' accountant.

On Sept. 25, 2017, Lynee F. Riley was appointed as the Chapter 11
trustee to the Debtors.  The Trustee retained Casner & Edwards LLP
as counsel.


TCS/JMJ SNOWDEN: Unsecureds to Get Interest Under 2nd Amended Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
TSC/JMJ Snowden River South, LLC, further amended its plan of
reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement to amend the
treatment of Class 3 - Allowed Secured Claim of Dashco., Inc., the
Junior Secured Lender, Class 5 - Allowed Priority Claims, and Class
6 - Allowed General Unsecured Claims.

Under the Second Amended Plan, the holder of the Allowed Class 3
Claim will receive either (i) payment of Cash in an amount equal to
that Allowed Class 3 Claim; or (ii) payment upon other less
favorable terms as may be agreed to by the holder of the Allowed
Class 3 Claim and the Reorganized Debtor. The holder of the Allowed
Class 3 Claim will also receive interest on the Allowed Class 3
Claim at the contractual rate and all fees as are contractually due
on the Allowed Class 3 Claim for the period commencing on the
Petition Date and ending on the Effective Date.  Class 3 is
unimpaired by the Plan.  The amount of the Class 3 Claim will be
reduced by all amounts received by the Junior Secured Lender prior
to or at the closing under the PSA from the sale of non-debtor
assets securing the Allowed Class 3 Claim.

Each holder of an Allowed Class 5 Claim will be paid as follows:
(i) in Cash in an amount equal to such Allowed Class 5 Claim, on
the later of the Effective Date or thirty (30) days after any such
claim becomes an Allowed Priority Claim, or (ii) upon such other
less favorable terms as may be agreed to by the holder of such
Allowed Priority Claim and the Reorganized Debtor. The holder of
any Allowed Class 5 Claim will also receive interest on such
Allowed Class 5 Claim at the Legal Interest Rate for the period
commencing on the Petition Date and ending on the Effective Date
(or date of payment, if payment is made after the Effective Date).
Class 5 is unimpaired by the Plan.

After all holders of Allowed Administrative Expense Claims and
Allowed Class 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Claims have been paid in full as
provided in the Plan, each holder of an Allowed Class 6 Claim will
be paid as follows: (i) in Cash in an amount equal to such Allowed
Class 6 Claim on the later of the Effective Date or thirty (30)
days after any claim becomes an Allowed Unsecured Claim, or (ii)
upon such other less favorable terms as may be agreed to by the
holder of such Allowed Unsecured Claim and the Reorganized Debtor.
The holders of Allowed Class 6 Claims will also receive interest on
such Allowed Class 6 Claims at the Legal Interest Rate for the
period commencing on the Petition Date and ending on the Effective
Date (or date of payment, if payment is made after the Effective
Date). Class 6 is unimpaired by the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement explaining the Second
Amended Plan is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb17-24150-96.pdf

              About TSC/JMJ Snowden River South

TSC/JMJ Snowden River South, LLC, filed as a "single asset real
estate" whose principal assets are located at 9301, 9309 and 9315
Snowden River Parkway Columbia, Maryland.  TSC/JMJ Snowden is an
affiliate of College Park Investments, LLC, which sought bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-22678) on Sept. 22, 2017.

TSC/JMJ Snowden filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No.
17-24150) on Oct. 23, 2017.  In the petition signed by Manager
Bruce S. Jaffe, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $10
million to $50 million.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota presides over the
case.  Lawrence A. Katz, Esq., at Hirschler Fleischer, serves as
the Debtor's legal counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


TEXDOM INVESTMENTS: Unsecureds to be Paid 50% Under Exit Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
General unsecured creditors of Texdom Investments, LLC, will be
paid 50% of their allowed claims under the company's proposed plan
to exit Chapter 11 protection.

The restructuring plan proposes to make an annual payment of 10% to
creditors holding Class 5 general unsecured claims.  Payments will
start on the sixth month following the effective date of the plan.
Class 5 is impaired.

Meanwhile, Class 6 unsecured claims of insiders will be paid from
net profits of Texdom Investments pro rata but only after all other
creditors, including secured creditors, are paid in full, beginning
30 days following the last payment to any remaining creditor under
the plan, according to the company's disclosure statement filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-70485-90.pdf

                     About Texdom Investments

Founded in 2013, Texdom Investments, LLC, owns apartment properties
in McAllen, Texas, valued by the company at $4.6 million.  Texdom
Investments filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
17-70485) on Dec. 14, 2017.  In the petition signed by Ramon I.
Rodriguez, manager, the Debtor disclosed $4.62 million in total
assets and $4.42 million in total liabilities.  The case is
assigned to Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez. Kurt Stephen, Esq., at the
Law Office of Kurt Stephen, PLLC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


THIRTY WOODHOLLOW: Case Summary & Unsecured Creditor
----------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Thirty Woodhollow Ct., Inc.
        30 Woodhollow Court
        Syosset, NY 11791

Business Description: Thirty Woodhollow Ct., Inc. is a real estate
                      company that owns a property in Syosset, New
                      York valued by the company at $1.53 million.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 19, 2018

Case No.: 18-74171

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Central Islip)

Judge: Hon. Alan S. Trust

Debtor's Counsel: Richard F. Artura, Esq.
                  PHILLIPS, ARTURA & COX
                  165 South Wellwood Avenue
                  Lindenhurst, NY 11757
                  Tel: (631) 226-2100
                  Fax: (631) 226-2160
                  Email: bankruptcy@pwqlaw.com

Total Assets: $1.53 million

Total Liabilities: $83,266

The petition was signed by Anupam Kumar Sharma, president.

The Debtor lists the Village of Muttontown as its sole unsecured
creditor holding a claim of $20,000.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb18-74171.pdf


TOYS R US: Court OKs Assignment of Brea I Lease to BCFWC
--------------------------------------------------------
Toys "R" Us -- Delaware, Inc., one of the Debtors in the jointly
administered chapter 11 cases captioned In re: Toys "R" Us, Inc.,
et al., Chapter 11, Debtors, Case No. 17-34665-KLP, (Jointly
Administered) (Bankr. E.D. Va.) currently rents space in a retail
shopping center from Brea Union Plaza I. TRU, in connection with a
court-approved auction of certain real property and unexpired
leases, is seeking final approval of the assumption and assignment
of its lease with Brea I to Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse
Corporation. Brea I objects to the proposed assignment, asserting
that TRU has not satisfied the adequate assurance of future
performance requirements of 11 U.S.C. section 365(b)(3) because the
assignment to Burlington would violate the exclusivity provision of
another lease in the shopping center and would disrupt the shopping
center's tenant mix and balance.

An evidentiary hearing was conducted on May 10, 2018. After
carefully considering the evidence and submissions of the parties,
Bankruptcy Judge Keith L. Phillips overruled Brea I's objections.

The parties agree that Brea Union Plaza constitutes a "shopping
center" as that term is used in 11 U.S.C. section 365(b)(3) and
that the Lease is "an unexpired lease of nonresidential real
property under which the debtor is the lessee" as that phrase is
used in 11 U.S.C.section 365(d)(4)(A). The Debtors' proposed
assignment of the Lease to Burlington must, therefore, satisfy the
"adequate assurance of future performance of a lease of real
property in a shopping center" requirement set forth in 11 U.S.C.
section 365(b)(3).

Section 365(b)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code has four subsections
applicable to shopping centers, including subsections (C) and (D),
which are at issue in this case. Subsection (C) requires adequate
assurance "that assumption or assignment of such lease is subject
to all the provisions thereof, including (but not limited to)
provisions such as a radius, location, use, or exclusivity
provision, and will not breach any such provision contained in any
other lease, financing agreement, or master agreement relating to
such shopping center." Subsection (D) requires adequate assurance
"that assumption or assignment of such lease will not disrupt any
tenant mix or balance in such shopping center."

The Court finds that assumption and assignment of the Lease to
Burlington will not breach the exclusivity provision contained in
the Ross Lease -- lease executed by Brea I with Ross Dress for Less
on Oct. 1, 2009. The provision prohibiting Brea I from allowing a
tenant to use the Premises to sell off-price apparel applies only
if Brea I "has the capacity to do so." As the court observed in
Martin Paint Stores, a court order approving the assumption and
assignment of a lease is a judicial action that may render the
landlord unable to comply with a restriction contained in another
lease. "The law excuses performance that has been rendered legally
impossible." Here, approval of the assumption and assignment of the
Lease to Burlington pursuant to section 365 renders Brea I without
the capacity to prevent Burlington's intended use, an occurrence
that may have been contemplated when the terms of the Ross Lease
were negotiated. Accordingly, there has been no showing that the
adequate protection requirement of section 365(b)(3)(C) is unmet.

Brea I's contention that the Debtors are unable to provide adequate
assurance under 11 U.S.C. section 365(b)(3)(D) fails in light of
the record and legal precedent. The court in In re Ames Department
Stores, Inc. stated that section 365(b)(3)(D) "must be interpreted
to refer to contractual protections and not undefined notions of
tenant mix." Finding no contractual provisions requiring the
assignee to comply with the requirements of any master agreement or
to preserve tenant mix and location, the court found that the
assignment sought in Ames did not violate section 365(b)(3)(D).5
Similarly, Brea I has pointed to no provisions in the Lease or any
applicable master agreement relating to tenant mix and balance that
would prohibit the assignment of the Lease to Burlington.

Aside from the lack of adequate protection, there is insufficient
evidence to support a finding that assignment of the Lease to
Burlington will disrupt the existing tenant mix and balance in Brea
Union Plaza. The Stipulations include a brief description of the
nature of the other tenants' businesses, but these brief
descriptions fall short of establishing that there was an intended
tenant mix. In a shopping center with 43 tenants, only two
primarily sell "off-price" apparel. Brea I has not demonstrated
that a third "off-price" retailer will disrupt the tenant mix and
balance.

In light of Brea I's failure to show that its contractual rights
will be violated by the assignment of the Lease to Burlington, the
Court will not prohibit the proposed assumption and assignment. The
Debtors have met their burden under section 365(b)(1) and (3) of
providing adequate assurance of future performance. The Court finds
that the assumption and assignment of the Lease to Burlington is in
the best interests of the Debtors' Estates.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
May 24, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2JZpgFJ from
Leagle.com.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., Debtor, represented by Peter J. Barrett --
peter.barrett@kutakrock.com -- Kutak Rock L.L.P., Michael A.
Condyles -- Michael.condyles@kutakrock.com -- Kutak Rock LLP, Loc
Pfeiffer -- loc.pfeiffer@kutakrock.com -- Kutak Rock LLP & Jeremy
S. Williams -- Jeremy.williams@kutakrock.com -- Kutak Rock LLP.

Judy A. Robbins & William K. Harrington, U.S. Trustees, represented
by Shannon Pecoraro, Office of the U.S. Trustee & Robert B. Van
Arsdale, Office of the U. S. Trustee.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor Committee,
represented by Olga Antle -- oantle@wolriv.com  -- Wolcott Rivers
Gates, Cullen Drescher Speckhart -- cspeckhart@wolriv.com --
Wolcott Rivers Gates & Joshua David Stiff -- jsiff@wolriv.com --
Wolcott Rivers Gates.

DLC Management Corp., Creditor Committee, represented by Joseph D.
Wilson, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP.

                    About Toys R Us, Inc.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., was an American toy and juvenile-products
retailer founded in 1948 and headquartered in Wayne, New Jersey, in
the New York City metropolitan area.  Merchandise was sold in 880
Toys "R" Us and Babies "R" Us stores in the United States, Puerto
Rico and Guam, and in more than 780 international stores and more
than 245 licensed stores in 37 countries and jurisdictions.
Merchandise was also sold at e-commerce sites including Toysrus.com
and Babiesrus.com.

On July 21, 2005, a consortium of Bain Capital Partners LLC,
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, and Vornado Realty Trust invested $1.3
billion to complete a $6.6 billion leveraged buyout of the
company.

Toys "R" Us is a privately owned entity but still files with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as required by its debt
agreements.

The Company's consolidated balance sheet showed $6.572 billion in
assets, $7.891 billion in liabilities, and a stockholders' deficit
of $1.319 billion as of April 29, 2017.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries and its
Canadian subsidiary voluntarily filed for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. Case No.
17-34665) on Sept. 19, 2017.  In addition, the Company's Canadian
subsidiary voluntarily commenced parallel proceedings under the
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") in Canada in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.  The Company's operations
outside of the U.S. and Canada, including its 255 licensed stores
and joint venture partnership in Asia, which are separate entities,
were not part of the Chapter 11 filing and CCAA proceedings.

Grant Thornton is the monitor appointed in the CCAA case.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Chapter 11 cases.

In the Chapter 11 cases, Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP serve as the Debtors' legal counsel.  Kutak Rock
LLP serves as co-counsel.  Toys "R" Us employed Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as its restructuring advisor; and Lazard Freres
& Co. LLC as its investment banker.  It hired Prime Clerk LLC as
claims and noticing agent.  Consensus Advisory Services LLC and
Consensus Securities LLC, serve as sale process investment banker.
A&G Realty Partners, LLC, serves as its real estate advisor.

On Sept. 26, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its legal counsel; Wolcott
Rivers, P.C., as local counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial
advisor; and Moelis & Company LLC as investment banker.

                        Toys "R" Us UK

Toys "R" Us Limited, Toys "R" Us, Inc.'s UK arm with 105 stores and
3,000 employees, was sent into administration in the United Kingdom
in February 2018.

Arron Kendall and Simon Thomas of Moorfields Advisory Limited, 88
Wood Street, London, EC2V 7QF were appointed Joint Administrators
on Feb. 28, 2018. The Administrators now manage the affairs,
business and property of the Company.  The Administrators act as
agents only and without personal liability.

The Administrators said they will make every effort to secure a
buyer for all or part of the business.

                   Liquidation of U.S. Stores

Toys "R" Us, Inc., on March 15, 2018, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking Bankruptcy Court approval to
start the process of conducting an orderly wind-down of its U.S.
business and liquidation of inventory in all 735 of the Company's
U.S. stores, including stores in Puerto Rico.

                         Propco I Debtors

Toys "R" Us Property Company I, LLC and its subsidiaries own fee
and leasehold interests in more than 300 properties in the United
States.  The Debtors lease the properties on a triple-net basis
under a master lease to Toys-Delaware, the operating entity for all
of TRU's North American businesses, which operates the majority of
the properties as Toys "R" Us stores, Babies "R" Us stores or
side-by-side stores, or subleases them to alternative retailers.

Toys "R" Us Property was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in
Wayne, New Jersey.  Toys 'R' Us Property operates as a subsidiary
of Toys "R" Us Inc.

Company LLC, MAP Real Estate LLC, TRU 2005 RE I LLC, TRU 2005 RE II
Trust, and Wayne Real Estate Company LLC (collectively, "Propco I
Debtors") sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case  No. 18-31429) on March 20, 2018.  The
Propco I Debtors sought and obtained procedural consolidation and
joint administration of their Chapter 11 cases, separate from the
Toys "R" Us Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

The Propco I Debtors estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion
and liabilities of $500 million to $1 billion.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Propco I Debtors' cases.

The Propco I Debtors hired Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg, LLP;
and Crowley, Liberatore, Ryan & Brogan, P.C., as co-counsel.  The
Debtors also tapped Kutak Rock LLP.  They hired Goldin Associates,
LLC, as financial advisors.


TWO BAR O COUNTRY: Plan Be Funded by Sale of Property
-----------------------------------------------------
Two Bar O Country Store, Inc., filed a disclosure statement and a
plan of reorganization that will be funded from the sale of the Two
Bar Property and the sale of the Perpetual Grant of Easement
pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 363(f), and cash on hand or to be
received from the Pet Lease rents.

The Debtor has been in the retail tack and feed business since the
1970s, operating primarily but not exclusively out of that
commercial property commonly known as 7821 E. Wrightstown Road,
Tucson, Arizona (the "Two Bar Property").  The Debtor, or the
Debtor's two principals, brothers Lloyd and Frank Ormsby, has owned
the Two Bar Property dating back to when they commenced work as
retail operators.  The Ormsby brothers continue to own the Two Bar
Property, but have not conducted retail tack and feed operations
since 2008.

The Ormsby Brothers signed corporate resolutions to both list the
Two Bar Property for sale with an agent and enter into a letter of
intent for the sale of a perpetual easement of the space subject to
the AT&T Lease ("Perpetual Grant of Easement") for $260,000.00
subject to Court approval.

The Debtor is also party to a multi-year expired commercial lease
with Tucson Feed and Pet Food, LLC ("Pet Lease").  Since the
Petition Date, the Debtor has received the base rent contemplated
in the Pet Lease in the amount of $3,646.48 per month.

The Debtor has approximately $8,000.00 in cash in its debtor in
possession accounts, having received rent in the approximate amount
of $3,800.00 each month since the order for relief and having only
used those rents to pay insurance premiums on the Two Bar Property
and to pay 2017 real property taxes.

Class 5 - General Unsecured Claims are unimpaired by the Plan.
Each Holder of an Impaired Allowed General Unsecured Claim in Class
5 will be paid no less than thirty (30) days after all
administrative claims and creditor classes are paid in full, but in
no event no longer than sixty (60) days from the close of escrow of
the Two Bar Property sale or the Perpetual Grant of Easement,
whichever is later.

A full-text copy of the disclosure statement dated June 13, 2018,
is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-12618-92.pdf

                   About Two Bar O Country Store

Two Bar O Country Store, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-12618) on Oct. 24,
2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $1 million and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Scott H. Gan presides over the case.  The Debtor hired The Law
Offices of C.R. Hyde, PLC, as its legal counsel.


VER TECHNOLOGIES: Plan Relies on $1.75 Billion Valuation
--------------------------------------------------------
VER Technologies Holdco, LLC, et al., filed and amended Exhibit E
(Valuation Analysis) to the Amended Disclosure Statement explaining
their Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.

In the Valuation Analysis, PJT Partners LP, as investment banker to
the Debtors, estimated that, as of an assumed Effective Date of
July 31, 2018, (a) the potential range of Reorganization Value is
approximately $1.525 billion to $1.975 billion (with a midpoint
estimate of approximately $1.750 billion); and (b) the potential
range of Equity Value is $0.344 billion to $0.794 billion (with a
midpoint estimate of approximately $0.569 billion).

A full-text copy of the Valuation Analysis is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb18-10834-468.pdf

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb18-10834-418.pdf

                      About VER Technologies

VER Technologies is a global provider of production equipment and
engineering support.  With the world's largest inventory of rental
equipment, VER supplies the most advanced technology to a broad
array of clients in the TV, cinema, live events, broadcast and
corporate markets.  Clients rely on VER's depth of experience in
Broadcast, Audio, Video, Lighting, LED, Cameras, Rigging, Media
Servers, Fiber and more.  With 35 offices across North America and
Europe, 24/7 support, and unparalleled expertise, VER can support
any live or taped production anywhere in the world.

VER Technologies, et al., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. Del. Case No. 18-10834) on April 5, 2018.

The Hon. Kevin Gross presides over the case.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Klehr Harrison Harvey
Branzburg LLP as their legal counsel; AlixPartners LLP as
restructuring advisor; PJT Partners as financial advisor; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and noticing agent.  

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, and Perella Weinberg
Partners serve as advisors to Bank of America Merrill Lynch.  FTI
Consulting and Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP serve as advisors to GSO
Capital Partners.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors on April 12, 2018.  The Trustee
tapped Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLC and Sulmeyerkupetz, a
Professional Corporation, as legal counsel.


VIDAL ROSARIO LEON: Ct. Won't Review Denial of Bermudez Claims
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Brian Tester denied Claimants Elizabeth Flores
Bermudez, Ledaliz Collazo Flores and Carlos E. Collazo's motion for
reconsideration and response to Debtor Vidal Rosario Leon's
objection to Collazo's claim.

The matter stems from the court's order granting Debtor's objection
to claim number 6-2, as a result of Mr. Carlos E. Collazo's failure
to timely respond. Claimants' motion for reconsideration requests
that the court review that particular order. However, in Claimants'
response, two additional orders are included for reconsideration.

In their motion to reconsider and subsequent response, Claimants
premise their request on three assertions: (1) the attorney
representing Claimants is not a bankruptcy practitioner, has
limited familiarity with bankruptcy proceedings and inadvertently
neglected to file a timely response to the Debtor's objection; (2)
the attorney for Claimants is a solo practitioner with a heavy
caseload; (3) As a result of Hurricanes Irma and Maria, the
attorney's law office was flooded and suffered damage.

Looking at the factors for Rule 60(b) relief, Claimants' arguments
allege that their failure to timely respond to the duly noticed
objections was due to excusable neglect. Moreover, Claimants argue
that the Debtor's objection to the reconsideration merely raises a
procedural misstep and does not delve into the substantive merits
of the Claimants’ response to the objection to claim.

The Court holds that the Claimants' first two assertions do not
rise to the level of excusable neglect. The lack of knowledge
regarding a particular practice of law is something to have been
considered by Claimants when choosing an attorney to represent
their interests. Likewise, a solo practitioner with a heavy
caseload does not excuse an attorney's procedural failings in the
handling of said caseload. The demands of a heavy caseload are
within the control of an attorney. "[N]eglect is hardly excusable
even if a lawyer is preoccupied with other matters." Unfortunately
for Claimants, routine carelessness by counsel leading to a late
filing is not enough to constitute excusable neglect.

And while the court is sympathetic to the power and internet
outages and the severe damage cause by Hurricanes Irma and Maria,
it does not merit consideration in this case.

After considering the factual and legal arguments brought forth,
the court finds that Claimants' motion neither provides the court
with genuine reasoning to justify excusable neglect nor a special
circumstance in demonstrating that the court's previous orders
committed clear error pursuant to Rule 9024 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure. None of Claimants arguments fall within the
purview of a Rule 60(b) motion.

A copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 7, 2018 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb17-06542-11-134.pdf

Vidal Rosario Leon filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 17-06542) on Oct. 18, 2017, and is
represented by Luisa S. Valle Castro, Esq. of C. Conde &
Associates.


VVC HOLDING: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR, Outlook Stable
---------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 Corporate Family Rating and
B3-PD Probability of Default Rating to VVC Holding Corp. (VBC,
formerly GE Healthcare's Value Based Care Division). Concurrently,
Moody's also assigned a B2 rating to co-borrowers VVC Holding Corp.
and WFM Holding Corp.'s proposed $600 million senior secured first
lien term loan and $75 revolving credit facility, and a Caa2 rating
to the companies' proposed $175 million senior secured second lien
term loan. Proceeds from the new issuance will be used to fund
Veritas Capital's acquisition of the division from General Electric
as well as transaction fees and expenses. The ratings outlook is
stable.

Assignments:

Issuer: VVC Holding Corp.

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

Senior Secured First Lien Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan, Assigned Caa2 (LGD6)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: VVC Holding Corp.

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 corporate family rating reflects risks associated with the
company's high initial financial leverage, with debt / EBITDA of
about 6.3x based on December 31, 2017 results, pro forma for the
transaction, excluding certain one-time expenses and treating
capitalized software as an expense. Leverage is expected to rise in
2019 however, with debt / EBITDA forecasted to be about 6.5x as the
company incurs anticipated costs to hire additional headcount and
build out IT systems. The rating is also constrained by risks
associated with setting up the company as a standalone entity and
in turning around recent organic revenue and EBITDA declines. These
risks are offset to some degree by the company's leading positions
as a software provider within sub-segments of healthcare IT;
enterprise financial management, ambulatory care management, and
healthcare workforce management. The company has longstanding
relationships with its clients and the high switching costs to
replace its products within customer workflows contribute to strong
recurring revenues and customer retention rates. GE VBC has
declined organically in recent years however, largely as a result
of underinvestment in product sales teams while under the
stewardship of its former corporate owner and efforts are underway
to bolster account management. Moody's notes that there are risks
to setting up the company as a standalone company and any
operational missteps could interrupt customer renewals and efforts
to return the business to organic top line growth. The company also
has aggressive financial policies as evidenced by the large
proportion of debt used to fund the carve out acquisition and these
policies could result in the use of further debt in the future for
dividends or acquisitions.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation for stabilization
of recent declines in revenue and EBITDA growth over the next 12-18
months as well as healthy free cash flow generation, with FCF /
Debt of approximately 4% after carve out expenses expected in
2019.

The ratings could face downward pressure if the company is unable
to stabilize revenues and generate EBITDA growth over the next
12-18 months. The ratings could face upward pressure if the company
is able to grow revenue and EBITDA organically such that leverage
declines toward 6x and FCF / debt is sustained above 5%.

VBC's liquidity is good, supported by an expected $50 million cash
balance at the close of the transaction, as well as access to a $75
million undrawn revolving credit facility. The revolver contains a
springing maximum net first lien leverage ratio which is tested at
35% drawn. The springing covenant is not expected to be tested over
the next 12-18 months.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Software
Industry published in December 2015.

VVC Holding Corp. and WFM Holding Corp. (collectively d/b/a "Value
Based Care Solutions" or "VBC") are entities owned by affiliates of
Veritas Capital which will hold the former division of GE
Healthcare's Value Based Care Solutions. The company provides
software to healthcare providers including revenue cycle
management, electronic data interchange, electronic medical
records, practice management and workforce management products. VBC
generated revenues of approximately $432 million in the year ended
December 31, 2017.


WARM HEART FAMILY: Taps Bud Stephen Tayman as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Warm Heart Family Assistance Living, Inc., seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland to hire Bud
Stephen Tayman, P.A., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; analyze claims; assist in the preparation of a
plan of reorganization; and provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

The Debtor previously filed an application to employ Meiselman,
Salzer, Inman & Kaminow, P.C. as its legal counsel.  It withdrew
the application on June 13.

For 2018, BST's normal hourly rate for Bud Stephen Tayman, Esq., is
$475 while the normal rate for paraprofessionals is $150.  The firm
has agreed that for the balance of 2018, the Debtor will be charged
for attorney time at the rate of $400 per hour and for paralegal
time at $150 per hour.

BST has required the Debtor an initial retainer of $20,000,
including a flat fee of $5,000.

Mr. Tayman disclosed in a court filing that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Bud Stephen Tayman, Esq.
     Bud Stephen Tayman, P.A.
     13017 Wisteria Drive
     Public Mailbox Box 325
     Germantown, MD 20874
     Phone: (301) 972-2306
     Fax: (301) 972-2306
     Email: btayman@taymanlaw.com

           About Warm Heart Family Assistance Living

Warm Heart Family Assistance Living, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-14990) on April 13,
2018, estimating less than $1 million in both assets and
liabilities.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota presides over the case.  Bud
Stephen Tayman, P.A., is the Debtor's legal counsel.


WEBSTER PARK: S&P Assigns Prelim B- Rating on $5MM Cl. E-R Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its preliminary ratings to the class
A-1AR, A-2R, B-R, C-R, D-R, and E-R replacement notes from Webster
Park CLO Ltd., a collateralized loan obligation (CLO) originally
issued in January 2016 that is managed by GSO/Blackstone Debt Funds
Management LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Blackstone Group
L.P. The replacement notes will be issued via a proposed
supplemental indenture.

The preliminary ratings reflect S&P's opinion that the credit
support available is commensurate with the associated rating
levels.

The preliminary ratings are based on information as of June 7,
2018. Subsequent information may result in the assignment of final
ratings that differ from the preliminary ratings.

On the July 20, 2018, refinancing date, the proceeds from the
issuance of the replacement notes are expected to redeem the
original notes. At that time, S&P anticipates withdrawing the
ratings on the original notes and assigning ratings to the
replacement notes. However, if the refinancing doesn't occur, S&P
may affirm the ratings on the original notes and withdraw its
preliminary ratings on the replacement notes.

The replacement notes are being issued via a proposed supplemental
indenture, which, in addition to outlining the terms of the
replacement notes, include:

-- The stated maturity reinvestment will be extended by 4.5
years.

-- Updated S&P Global Ratings industry classifications,
recoveries, and country groupings for recovery purposes will be
used.

-- 90.35% of the underlying collateral obligations have credit
ratings assigned by S&P Global Ratings.

-- 96.22% of the underlying collateral obligations have recovery
ratings issued by S&P Global Ratings.

S&P said, "Our review of this transaction included a cash flow
analysis, based on the portfolio and transaction as reflected in
the trustee report, to estimate future performance. In line with
our criteria, our cash flow scenarios applied forward-looking
assumptions on the expected timing and pattern of defaults, and
recoveries upon default, under various interest rate and
macroeconomic scenarios. In addition, our analysis considered the
transaction's ability to pay timely interest or ultimate principal,
or both, to each of the rated tranches.

"We will continue to review whether, in our view, the ratings
assigned to the notes remain consistent with the credit enhancement
available to support them, and we will take further rating actions
as we deem necessary."

  PRELIMINARY RATINGS ASSIGNED

  Webster Park CLO Ltd./Webster Park CLO LLC
  Replacement class        Rating       Amount (mil. $)
  A-1AR                    AAA (sf)              300.00
  A-1BR                    NR                     20.00
  A-2R                     AA (sf)                62.50
  B-R (deferrable)         A (sf)                 27.00
  C-R (deferrable)         BBB- (sf)              29.50
  D-R (deferrable)         BB- (sf)               19.50
  E-R (deferrable)         B- (sf)                 5.00
  Subordinated Notes       NR                     46.90

  NR--Not rated.


WILL NELSON: Watson Buying Memphis Property for $110K
-----------------------------------------------------
Will J. Nelson and Hattie N. Nelson ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Tennessee to authorize the sale of the
commercial property located at 3210 Hernando Road, Memphis,
Tennessee, Tax Parcel ID No. 07701100002, is commonly known as
Hernando's Hideaway, to Kenneth Dale Watson for $110,000.

The Debtors own the Property more particularly described and as
further detailed by the Quit Claim Deed conveying the Property to
Debtors and recorded with the Shelby County Register of Deeds at
Instrument No. 11105194.  Said property is appraised by the Shelby
County Assessor of Property for $88,600.

The Debtors' interest in the property is included in the bankruptcy
estate.  The property is currently occupied by Freedom Road
Recovery on a month-to-month term.  They Debtors currently owe
delinquent real estate taxes on the property to the City of Memphis
Trustee in the amount of $13,615 and to the Shelby County Assessor
for $18,542.

The Debtors obtained a contract for sale of the properties to the
Buyer for the sum of $110,000.00.  The parties entered into the
Purchase & Sale Contract for Commercial Property.

The Debtors believe that the sales price obtained reflects the
current market value of the property, that it is the best sales
price obtainable at this juncture, and that it is in the Debtors'
best interests to sell said property.

First Alliance Bank consents to the relief sought and it approves
the sale of the property.  Pursuant to an agreement between First
Alliance Bank, as first mortgagee, and the Debtors, First Alliance
Bank is to apply the May 2018 adequate protection payment of
$15,000 to the promissory note attributed to the property and
Debtors will pay $87,968 to First Alliance Bank from the sales
proceeds of the property.  The Debtors will also pay the
aforementioned, outstanding City of Memphis and Shelby County real
estate taxes at closing from the sales proceeds.

The remaining miscellaneous fees, including, but not limited to:
appraisal fees, forced placed insurance proceeds and related fees
incurred by First Alliance Bank, and expenses associated with the
loan and interest are to be carried over to the Debtors other notes
with AB.  In return, First Alliance Bank will release their Deed of
Trust associated with the property and registered with the Shelby
County Register of Deeds at Instrument No. 06129217.

Great American Insurance Company, the second mortgage holder on the
properties does not join Debtors in the Motion, but consents to the
relief sought and approves the sale of the property.

Will Nelson, II, the third mortgage holder on the property does not
join Debtors in this Motion, but consents to the relief sought and
approves the sale of the property.

A copy of their Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Will_Nelson_178_Sales.pdf

The case is In re Will J. Nelson and Hattie N. Nelson (Bankr. W.D.
Tenn. Case No. 17-20831).


WORLD GLOBAL: Court Directs DOJ Watchdog to Appoint Examiner
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge A. Jay Cristol of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida directed the U.S. Trustee to appoint an
independent examiner pursuant to Section 1104(c) of the Bankruptcy
Code to perform certain duties in the Chapter 11 case of World
Global Financing, Inc.

Eaglewood SPV I LP, filed the motion seeking appointment of a
Chapter 11 trustee or examiner saying, as of May, the Debtor has
stolen over $1.8 million of Eaglewood's cash (not cash collateral
but cash that Eaglewood owns which the Debtor collected on
Eaglewood's behalf and held in trust).

The Debtor, WG Funding Trust, and WG Financing, Inc., were an
originator and servicer of merchant cash advances ("MCAs") made to
the third party merchants on behalf of several investors who fund
and own such MCAs.  Cyril Eskenazi is the CEO and owner of the
Debtor.  Eaglewood is one of the largest investors/customers in the
WG Parties' MCA business.  According to Eaglewood, for several
months prior to the Petition Date, the WG Parties and their agents
willfully breached and flagrantly disregarded their contractual and
fiduciary obligations to Eaglewood, including without limitation,
stealing over $1.8 million that they collected on Eaglewood's
behalf as the servicer of Eaglewood's MCAs.

Eaglewood held that in light of the seriousness of the conduct of
the Debtor and its agents, and that all or a significant amount of
the cash in the Debtor's possession indisputably belongs to
Eaglewood, which was supposed to be held in trust for the benefit
of Eaglewood, it is essential that an independent estate fiduciary
be appointed to manage the estate's affairs.  The Debtor's
mismanagement, fraud, theft, and willful violations of the State
Court's orders all require the immediate appointment of a chapter
11 trustee who can evaluate the Debtor's financial dealings and
move forward in a manner that protects the interests of all
creditors, including Eaglewood, Eaglewood said in its motion.

In an amended motion, Eaglewood contended that it would be just and
necessary for the Court to enter an order converting this case to a
case under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and if the Court
declines to convert the case, then it would be just and necessary
for the Court to enter an order dismissing this case.

Eaglewood has agreed to pay all reasonable fees and costs incurred
by the Examiner through June 11, 2018. To the extent the Court
determines that the Debtor should be responsible, in whole or in
part, for the reasonable fees and costs incurred by the Examiner,
Eaglewood will be authorized to seek, by separate motion, an
administrative expense claim for any and all fees and costs paid to
the Examiner.

Attorneys for Eaglewood:

   Harris J. Koroglu, Esq.
   James A. Timko, Esq.
   SHUTTS & BOWEN LLP
   200 South Biscayne Blvd., Suite 4100
   Miami, FL 33131
   Phone: 305-358-6300
   Facsimile: 305-347-7888
   E-mail: hkoroglu@shutts.com
           JTimko@shutts.com

      -- and --

   Eric Lopez Schnabel, Esq.
   Daniel Goldberger, Esq.
   DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
   51 West 52nd Street
   New York, NY 10019-6119
   Telephone: (212) 415-9368
   Facsimile: (646) 514-9843
   E-mail: schnabel.eric@dorsey.com
           goldberger.dan@dorsey.com

      -- and --

   Erin Bryan, Esq.
   DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
   50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500
   Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498
   Telephone: (612) 340-2600
   Facsimile: (612) 340-2868
   Email: bryan.erin@dorsey.com

                  About World Global Financing

World Global Financing Inc. -- http://www.wgfinancing.com/-- is a
merchant cash advance provider that offers financing programs to
businesses that perform well but cannot show it with financial
statements, business owners with bad credit history and other newer
businesses. The Company offers small business financing, bad credit
business financing, business working capital, automotive business
financing, beauty business financing, business equipment financing,
commercial truck financing, gas station financing, healthcare
business financing, heavy equipment financing, hotel/motel
financing, restaurant business financing, retail store financing,
and service business financing. World Global Financing is
headquartered in Miami, Florida.

World Global Financing Inc., based in Miami, FL, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-15499) on May 8, 2018.  In
the petition signed by CEO Cyril Eskenazi, the Debtor estimated $10
million to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Hon.
Jay A. Cristol presides over the case.  Glenn D. Moses, Esq., at
Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., serves as bankruptcy counsel.


WRAP MEDIA: Court Tentatively Approves Luckett, IPL Plan Outline
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Hannah L. Blumenstiel of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California tentatively approves the disclosure
statement, dated June 6, 2018, filed by Matthew Luckett and
InterPrivate, LLC, for Wrap Media, Inc.

July 13, 2018 is the last day for submitting written ballots
accepting or rejecting the plan, and the last day for filing and
serving written objections to the disclosure statement and/or to
confirmation of the plan.

The hearing on final approval of the disclosure statement and on
confirmation of the plan will occur on July 19, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 16th Floor, Courtroom 19, San Francisco,
California, 94102.

Under the Third Amended Disclosure Statement, general unsecured
creditors will receive a pro-rata share of a pot of up to $500,000
created by a series of payments made by the reorganized Debtor
annually into a segregated account set up to facilitate
distributions to general unsecured creditors.  The term "pro-rata"
means the entire amount of the fund divided by the entire amount
owed to creditors with allowed claims in this class.

The annual payment made by the reorganized Debtor into the
segregated account will be in an amount equal to 20% of the Tax
Benefit.  Creditors may not transfer, directly or indirectly, their
right to payments from this pot plan without the prior written
consent of the Debtor.  The annual payments will be paid within 120
days following the end of each taxable period beginning after
December 31, 2017, and will continue until the earlier of: (i) the
expiration of the applicable carryforward period of the NOL with
respect to any taxable period; or (ii) the date the general
unsecured creditors have received $500,000 in aggregate payments.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb16-31326-113.pdf

                        About Wrap Media

Wrap Media LLC owns a mobile engagement and messaging platform that
supercharges marketing, sales and customer service.

Wrap Media, Inc., conducts no operations.  Wrap Media, Inc.'s sole
asset is an approximately 60% equity interest in Wrap Media, LLC.
WMI was the financing vehicle for the enterprise, raising several
rounds of equity and obtaining $9.5 million of convertible debt
financing.  WMI has four creditors consisting of three convertible
note holders owed an aggregate of approximately $10 million and
joint liability on the secured debt held by SVB.

Wrap Media, LLC, and holding company Wrap Media, Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Cal. Case Nos. 16-31325 and 16-31326) on Dec. 10, 2016.  The
petitions were signed by Eric Greenberg, chief executive officer.

The Court entered an order jointly administering the two cases but
vacated this order upon Wrap Media, LLC's oral motion on April 7,
2017.

The cases are assigned to Judge Hannah L. Blumenstiel.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated their assets at $1
million to $10 million and liabilities at $10 million to $50
million.

The Debtors hired St. James Law, P.C., as their legal counsel; and
Beyer Law Group, LLP, as special counsel.  Kranz & Associates was
hired for outsourced operations.

On Jan. 31, 2017, the U.S. trustee for Region 17 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee's
attorneys are Tobias S. Keller, Esq., Keith A. McDaniels, Esq., and
Dara L. Silveria, Esq., at Keller & Benvenutti LLP, in San
Francisco, California.


Z-1 MANAGEMENT: Real Equity Buying Memphis Property for $300K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Z-1 Management, LLC, asks the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Tennessee to authorize the sale of the real
property known as 3035 Directors Row, Memphis, Tennessee, Parcel ID
060222 00181, comprising an office complex, to Real Equity
Tennessee, LLC for $300,000.

Contemporaneously with the Motion, the Debtor has filed a separate
Motion to Shorten Notice of the Sale Hearing.

The Debtor owns the Real Estate.  The Real Estate was listed for
sale by the Debtor's duly authorized real estate agent, Jeff
Waddell of Crye-Leike Realtors.  Mr. Waddell has actively marketed
the property through multiple channels. The Debtor has negotiated a
sale price of $300,000 and entered into a Commercial Purchase and
Sale Agreement subject to the Court's approval.  The proposed
Purchaser is a non-insider.

A copy of the Contract and related documents attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/Z-1_Management_49_Sales.pdf

The Real Estate is encumbered by a Deed of Trust and Assignment of
Rents held by Laurence Block and General Investments, LLC.  The
City of Memphis and the Shelby County Trustee hold claims against
the Real Estate for property taxes.  

Upon closing of the sale approved by the Court, valid, perfected
and unavoidable liens, claims, and encumbrances will attach to the
sale proceeds to the same extent, and in the same priority, as the
prepetition liens, claims and encumbrances, which will be paid at
closing along with usual and customary closing costs and expenses
of sale, including a 6% real estate commission to Jeff Waddell.

The Debtor believes a sale of its interest in the Real Estate as
proposed will produce the highest value to the Estate.

As the property has been marketed for an extended period of time,
the Debtor asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay imposed by
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), to the extent that it applies.

                     About Z-1 Management

Z-1 Management, LLC, is a privately held company whose principal
assets are located at 3035 Directors Row Memphis, Tennessee.

Z-1 Management filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case
No. 18-21898) on March 2, 2018.  In the petition signed by Lawrence
Migliara, Jr., member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.  

The Hon. Paulette J. Delk is the case judge.

Russell W. Savory at Beard & Savory, PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.
Jeff Waddell of Crye-Leike Realtors is the Debtor's real estate
agent.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


[*] The Incredible Shrinking Bankruptcy Case
--------------------------------------------
By Michael Eisenband

A PDF version of this story, with colorful Exhibits, is available
at https://goo.gl/7bVJpB at no charge.

Southeastern Grocers, LLC, which filed for bankruptcy in late March
with a prepackaged plan of reorganization, emerged from Chapter 11
in 65 days with a plan that won support from key creditor groups,
having equitized more than $500 million of debt, or nearly 40% of
pre-petition debt, as well as securing new exit financing, making
select store closings and some M&A transactions. It's an impressive
accomplishment in two months' time, even by today's "pedal to the
metal" pace, and a feat that would have been hard to imagine a
decade ago.

Most restructuring professionals recognize that the average
duration of Chapter 11 cases has become shorter in recent years,
but the contraction in average case length has been particularly
striking since 2015. The primary driver of shorter case lengths is
the prevalence of prepackaged, prearranged or prenegotiated filings
(collectively referred to herein as "Pre-filings") in recent years.
We summarized more than 300 Chapter 11 cases that emerged from
bankruptcy in 2011-2017 via a confirmed plan of reorganization, of
which nearly 66% of cases that emerged in 2016-2017 were
Pre-filings compared to approximately 40% over the previous five
years (Exhibit 1). Prepackaged cases consistently accounted for 45%
of all Pre-filings -- 25 of 55 Pre-filings in the last two years
and 65 of 142 Pre-filings since 2011.

Consequently, the average duration of Chapter 11 reorganizations
fell by nearly one-half in 2016-2017 compared to 2011-2015, to 235
days from 435 days. (See Exhibit 2 for a breakdown by category.
Note that we capped case length at a maximum of 1,000 days in order
to mitigate the skewing effect of exceedingly long cases, most of
which were litigation-related.) The average case length of
Pre-filings didn't change materially over this seven-year period;
there were just a lot more of them in 2016-2017. Prepackaged
filings were consistently within a range of 60-90 days from filing
to emergence, averaging 81 days, while prearranged and
pre-negotiated filings took about 230 days to emerge.

It wasn't just the increasing frequency of Pre-filings that was
driving down average case length -- the duration of freefall cases
contracted sharply, to 370 days in 2016-2017 from 600 days in
2011-2015. We acknowledge that this recent contraction might
contain an element of case-specific randomness, as there were only
a total of 30 freefall cases that emerged in 2016-2017 compared to
an average of nearly 30 per year from 2011-2015.

[EXHIBIT 1 -- Emerging Chapter 11 Cases via a POR]

The impact of shorter case lengths on financial advisory work isn't
as easy to discern as it might seem. The prevalence of Pre-filings
does not necessarily equate to less work for advisors, particularly
company-side advisors -- it just means that much of the groundwork
in reorganizing, mainly negotiating with creditor groups, arranging
new financing and outlining a path forward, is done before filing.
In some instances, it probably does translate into less work for
financial advisors. Let's be candid; Pre-filings these days are
primarily quick balance sheet fixes and often little else other
than the rejection of unfavorable executory contracts and leases.
The concept of reorganization as a comprehensive process to
fundamentally repair broken or uncompetitive businesses has become
something akin to wishful thinking ever since the recession.
Generally speaking, this is largely attributable to a lack of
unencumbered assets at time of filing, as leveraged borrowers
increasingly have relied on first-lien debt in recent years
compared to the pre-recession period, which has limited financing
options available to debtors during the pendency of a case.
Aggressive event milestones often imposed by DIP lenders no longer
afford a debtor the luxury of a lengthy reorganization. Given these
developments, it could be argued that the scope and extent of
financial advisor services rendered today in a typical Pre-filing
reorganization is more limited than in years past.

[EXHIBIT 2 -- Emerging Chapter 11 Cases  Avg. Case Length]

Moreover, for advisors who don't get a mandate until a filing is
imminent or has occurred, such as UCC advisors or certain ad hoc
groups, shorter case lengths associated with Pre-filings very
likely reduces the scope of services provided compared to a similar
role in freefall cases. Bankruptcy judges presiding over fast track
reorganizations may be less inclined to approve (or more likely to
limit) discovery motions and other causes of action that often
motivate impaired creditors, but which would hinder the timetable
of a plan that is otherwise confirmable. Lastly, plans of
reorganization in Pre-filing cases increasingly have left general
unsecured claims unimpaired in order to expedite plan
implementation, thereby reducing or eliminating unsecured
creditors' need for advisor representation in some instances.

The prevalence of prepackaged plan filings or negotiated RSAs and
PSAs that quickly become the basis of a plan of reorganization is a
trend that's here to stay and will continue to impact case length
and the scope of advisory work. Financial advisors will continue to
rack up tombstones and deal toys, but in some cases, the work may
not be as extensive (or lucrative) as it once was.

                            *      *     *  

Michael Eisenband is the Global Co-Leader of the FTI Consulting
Corporate Finance & Restructuring segment and the leader of
Restructuring Services, and is based in New York.  With more than
30 years of experience, Mr. Eisenband is renowned nationally as an
industry leader in providing restructuring advice to creditors and
companies in complex Chapter 11 and out-of-court workout
situations. Mr. Eisenband is a member of the firm's Executive
Committee.


[^] BOOK REVIEW: The Financial Giants In United States History
--------------------------------------------------------------
Author:  Meade Minnigerode
Publisher:  Beard Books
Softcover:  260 pages
List Price:  $34.95

Order your personal copy today at http://is.gd/tJWvs2

The financial giants were Stephen Girard, John Jacob Astor, Jay
Cooke, Daniel Drew, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Jay Gould, and Jim Fisk.
The accomplishments of some have made them household names today.
But all were active in the mid 1800s. This was a time when the
United States, having freed itself from Great Britain only a few
decades earlier, was gaining its stride as an independent nation.
The country was expanding westward, starting to engage in
significant international trade, and laying the foundations for
becoming a major industrial power. Astor, Vanderbilt, Gould, and
the others played major parts in all these areas. During the Civil
War in the first half of the 1860s, some became leading suppliers
of goods or financiers to the Federal government.

Minnigerode's focus is the highlights of the life of each of the
seven. Along with this, he identifies each one's prime
characteristics contributing to his road to fortune and how his
life turned out in the end. Not all of the men managed to keep and
pass on the fortunes they amassed. They are seen a "financial
giants" not only because they made fortunes in the early days of
American business and industry, but also for their place in laying
out the groundwork for American business enterprise, innovation,
and leadership, and for the notoriety they had in their day.

Minnigerode summarizes the style or achievement of each man in a
single word or short phrase. Stephan Girard is "The Merchant
Banker"; Cornelius Vanderbilt, "The Commodore." "The Old Man of the
Street" summarizes Daniel Drew"; with "The Wizard of Wall Street"
summarizing Jay Gould. Jim Fisk is "The Mountebank."

Jay Cooke, "The Tycoon," was to be "known throughout the country
for his astonishingly successful handling of the great Federal
loans which financed the Civil War." After the War, one of the
leaders of the Confederacy remarked that the South was really
defeated in the Federal Treasury Department thus, even on the enemy
side, giving recognition to Cooke's invaluable work of enabling the
Federal government to meet the huge costs of the War.  After the
War, having earned the reputation as "the foremost financier in the
country," Cooke became involved in many large financial ventures,
including the building of a railroad to link the East and West
coasts of America. In this railroad venture, however, Cooke and his
banking firm made a fatal misstep in investing in the Northern
Pacific railway. The Northern Pacific turned out to be a house of
cards. When Cooke's firm was unable to meet interest payments it
owed because of money it had put into the Northern Pacific, the
firm went bankrupt; and this caused alarm in the stock market and
financial circles.

The roads to wealth of the "financial giants" were not smooth.
Like others amassing great wealth, they had to take risks. The
tales Minnigerode tells are not only instructive on how individuals
have historically made fortunes in business and the characteristics
they had for this, but are also cautionary tales on the contingency
of great wealth in some circumstances. Jim Fisk, for instance, a
larger-than life character "jovial and quick witted [who was also]
a swindler and a bandit, a destroyer of law and an apostle of
fraud," was presumably killed by a former business partner. Unlike
Cooke and Fisk, Cornelius Vanderbilt and John Jacob Astor built
fortunes that lasted generations.  Vanderbilt - nicknamed Commodore
- starting in the New York City area, built ships and established
domestic and international merchant and passenger lines. With the
government coming to depend on these with the rapid growth of
commerce of the period and the Civil War for a time, Vanderbilt
practically had monopolistic control of private shipping in the
U.S. Astor made his fortune by developing trade and other business
in the upper Midwest, which was at the time the sparsely-populated
frontier of America, rich in natural resources and other potential
with the Great Lakes and regional rivers as a means for
transportation.

Although the social and business conditions in the early and mid
1800s when the U.S. was in the early stages of its development were
unique to that period, by concentrating on the characteristics,
personalities, strategies, and activities of the seven outstanding
businessmen of this period, Minnigerode highlights business traits
and acumen that are timeless. His sharply-focused, short
biographies are colorful and memorable.  This author has written
many other books and worked in the military and government.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***