/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180620.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Wednesday, June 20, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 170

                            Headlines

2 BROTHERS TRANSPORT: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for July 7
8281 MERRILL ROAD: Cuts Unsecured Creditors' Recovery to $35K
ACADEMY SPORTS: Bank Debt Trades at 20% Off
ACOSTA INC: Bank Debt Trades at 20% Off
AMSTAR EMERGENCY: July 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing

ANTHONY W. THORNTON: Court Allows Employment of SW as Counsel
BAL HARBOUR: Exclusive Filing Period Extended to Sept. 17
BG 1 LAZZARA: Taps Van Horn Law Group as Legal Counsel
BG BIG BOAT: Taps Van Horn Law Group as Legal Counsel
BIOAMBER INC: Obtains Court Approval for DIP Financing

BRADLEY DISTRIBUTING: Talks With Colonial Funding Delay Plan Filing
BRADLEY J BARKER DDS: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
CALVIN GILL: Disclosures Conditionally OK'd; July 17 Plan Hearing
CAMECO TECHNOLOGIES: Law Firm's Summary Judgment Award Reversed
CAREY CRUTCHER: Unsecured Creditors to Be Paid Annually for 5 Yrs

CARLA CARRAWAY: Court Dismisses Bid to Value Collateral
CC CARE: Hires Prospect Resources as Energy Consultant
CEC ENTERTAINMENT: Bank Debt Trades at 6% Off
CENVEO INC: New Components in Global Settlement Disclosed in Plan
CHIEF POWER: Bank Debt Trades at 13% Off

CLINTON NURSERIES: VFI Master Lease Not True Lease, Court Rules
CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Amends CBCA Plan of Arrangement
CORRECT CLAIM: Unsecureds to Get 6.8% to100% Under Amended Plan
DARDEN-GREEN: Carrier-Weathertech to Get 88.13% Under Amended Plan
DAVID HANKS: Has $239K Offer for Tipton County Property

DDC GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
DEBORAH VINSON: Must Return $105K Deposit to Stirlings, K. Robinson
DEL MONTE: Bank Debt Trades at 17% Off
DELMAC LLC: Tital Commercial Buying Griswold Property for $900K
DOUBLE EAGLE: GBT Opposes Approval of Disclosure Statement

DPW HOLDINGS: CEO Ault Will Receive a $400,000 Annual Salary
DPW HOLDINGS: Plans E-Payments Joint Venture with QPAGOS & IPS
EDEN HOME: Creditor's Panel Hires Martin & Drought as Counsel
ELEMENTS BEHAVIORAL: $65M Credit Bid to Open Auction
ELEMENTS BEHAVIORAL: Hires Houlihan Lokey as Investment Bankers

ERIN ENERGY: Creditor's Panel Hires Pachulski Stang as Counsel
FAMILY FOR LIFE: Identifies Post-Confirmation Management
FEGS HEALTH: District Court Dismisses Beverly Antwi Suit
FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: Bid for Preliminary Injunction vs FERC OK'd
FORASTERO INC: Hires Reiner & Reiner as Special Counsel

FREELINC TECHNOLOGIES: Hires Ashby & Geddes as Co-Counsel
FREELINC TECHNOLOGIES: Seeks to Hire Dragich Law as Counsel
FTTE LLC: Seeks July 30 Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extension
GLOBAL MINISTRIES: S&P Lowers Ratings on 14 Bond Tranches to 'CCC+'
GOLF CARS: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement

GUARDIAN ENTERPRISES: Delays Plan For Unresolved Adversary Action
GUY AMERICA: Sale of Brooklyn Property to Fund Latest Plan
H & S BUSINESS: Hires Joyce W. Lindauer as Counsel
HAMPTON OWNERS: 11th Cir. Affirms Sanctions to Leventhal Entities
HEATH OIL: Taps Paul E. Jennings as Legal Counsel

HMH MEDIA: Citizens Bank to be Paid $5K Under Liquidation Plan
HOBBICO INC: Horizon Hobby Buying Miscellaneous Assets for $557K
HOPE INDUSTRIES: To Pay Unsecureds in Full Over 5 Years
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN: Bank Debt Trades at 7% Off
IHEARTMEDIA INC: Wants to Maintain Exclusivity Until January 2019

INDUSTRIAL FABRICATION: Delays Plan Pursuing Exit Financing
IRON BRIDGE: Amended Plan Cuts Creditors' Recovery to 25%
IRON BRIDGE: DOJ Watchdog Seeks Conversion or Dismissal of Case
JOHN HULL TRUCKING: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
JUDYCAT INC: Unsecured Creditors to Receive Nothing Under Plan

KC7 RANCH: Seeks to Hire Wesley C. Stripling as Special Counsel
KEITH BLACK RACING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
LANDS' END: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
LIGHTSQUARED INC: Bank Debt Trades at 15% Off
MARANATHA EVANGEL: Ups Unsecureds' Recovery to 100% Over 15 Years

MIDWEST PORTABLE: Direct Capital Objects to Disclosures Approval
MILLER'S DELICATESSEN: Hires David Lefkowitz as Accountant
MOKE PEACE: Seeks to Hire Ira R. Abel as Counsel
MONSTER CONCRETE: July 25 Approval Hearing on Plan Outline
MOREHEAD MEMORIAL: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until Aug. 15

MORGAN'S MAIDS: July 10 Plan Outline Hearing
MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Court Stays Trust Suits Pending Mediation
MURRAY ENERGY: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
NATURE'S BOUNTY: Bank Debt Trades at 10% Off
NAVILLUS TILE: Examiner Hires National Creditor as Consultant

NEIMAN MARCUS: Bank Debt Trades at 11% Off
NMSOOH INC: Seeks to Hire Certilman Balin as Attorneys
OFFSHORE SPECIALTY: Committee Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
OLD LUMBERYARD: Seeks to Hire Norris McLaughlin as Attorney
OMEROS CORP: Shareholders Elected 2 Class II Directors

PATRICK O'LEARY: Has $480K Offer for Southlake Property
PATTY DEWITT: Hadoxes Buying Morgantown Property for $2.4 Million
PAUL'S AUTO CENTERS: Unsecureds to be Paid $500 Monthly Under Plan
PAYSON PETROLEUM: Trustee Selling Grayson Property for $700K
PAZZO PAZZO: Seeks to Hire Norris McLaughlin as Attorney

PEANUT CO: Hires Patton Knipp, and Mann Conroy as Co-Counsel
PENSON WORLDWIDE: Bankr. Court Has Jurisdiction in Suit vs SGH
PENTHOUSE GLOBAL: Trustee Selling Intellectual Property for $1.7M
PEORIA REGIONAL: To Sell Property to ADB to Fund Plan Payments
PETSMART INC: Bank Debt Trades at 16% Off

PIN OAK PROPERTIES: Trustee Taps Jackson Kelly as Special Counsel
POST PRODUCTION: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
PREMIER PCS: Court Approves 2nd Amended Disclosure Statement
PRESSURE BIOSCIENCES: Converts Additional $7.24M Debt Into Equity
PRIME HOTEL: To Sell Property to Fund Plan Payments

R.O. MANSE: Unsecured Creditors to Get 100% Over 12 Months
RAMLA USA: Summer Rolls Buying Central Kitchen for $189K
RANDOLPH AND RANDOLPH: Hires Lehr Middlebrooks as Special Counsel
RENNOVA HEALTH: CEO Apologizes for Quarterly Report Filing Delay
RK & GROUP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

ROSEGARDEN HEALTH: PCO Hires Barbara H. Katz as Counsel
ROTINI INC: Unsecured Creditors to Get 11.4% in 3 Annual Payments
ROXWELL PERFORMANCE: Court Dismisses R. Muniz Appeal as Moot
RSF 17872: Seeks to Increase Orb Postpetition Credit to $5.5-Mil.
S CHASE LIMITED: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation

SANDY CREEK: Bank Debt Trades at 10% Off
SCHAFFEL DEVELOPMENT: Taps Lewis Landau as Bankruptcy Attorney
SERTA SIMMONS: Bank Debt Trades at 13% Off
SHILLINGTON SOCIAL: M&T Bank to Get $491 Over 15 Years
SHILLINGTON SOCIAL: Seeks Conditional Approval of Plan Disclosures

SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: C&T to Get $2.2MM from Iris Property Sale Proceeds
SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until July 31
SKILLSOFT CORP: Bank Debt Trades at 19% Off
SPEED VEGAS: Sr. Loan Lenders to Get 0% to 5% Under Amended Plan
STAPLES INC: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off

SUNCOAST INTERNAL: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to Aug. 8
TEXAS E&P: Trustee Selling Gillis-English Bayou Unit Interest
TK RESTAURANT: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% in 3 Annual Payments
TOP SHELF: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
TRILOGY INTERNATIONAL: Fitch Affirms 'B-' IDR, Outlook Stable

TUCSON ONE: Deficiency Claims Added in 1st Amended Plan
VINCE’S BLACK: June 26 Status Hearing of Plan, Disclosures
VIRTUAL COMMUNICATIONS: Equity Contributions to Fund Proposed Plan
W.W. CONSTRUCTION: Seeks to Hire Aldrich CPAS as Accountant
WESTMORELAND RESOURCE: Obtains Default Waiver Extension to July 31

WILLOW BEND: July 23 Continued Hearing on Disclosure Statement
WINN-DIXIE: Dist. Court Junks K&B Suit vs Caffery-Saloom, ANICO
WORLD GLOBAL FINANCING: Examiner Hires Bast Amron as Attorney
ZAMINDAR PROPERTIES: FBA Files Amended Objection to Plan Outline

                            *********

2 BROTHERS TRANSPORT: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for July 7
--------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Charles M. Walker finds that 2 Brothers Transport,
LLC's chapter 11 plan, dated May 17, 2018, provides adequate
information and a separate disclosure statement is not necessary.

The Debtor is authorized to solicit votes for acceptance or
rejection of the plan.

June 22, 2018 is fixed as the last day for serving ballots
accepting or rejecting the plan, and the last day for filing and
serving written objections to confirmation of the plan.

The hearing on confirmation of the plan will be held on July 7,
2018 at 9:00 a.m. in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Tennessee, Courtroom 2, Customs House, 701 Broadway,
Nashville, Tennessee 37203.

Unsecured creditors will be paid $23,250 under the company's
proposed plan to exit Chapter 11 protection.

The restructuring plan will provide a pool of $23,250 to be paid
pro-rata to creditors holding Class 4 unsecured claims.  Payments
will begin on or following the first day of the month after 24
months following the effective date of the plan.

2 Brothers intends to continue its business operations to fund the
payments proposed in the plan.  The company demonstrated through
its monthly operating reports that it will have sufficient funds to
pay the proposed payments, according to its disclosure statement
filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Tennessee.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb17-04962-87.pdf

                 About 2 Brothers Transport LLC

2 Brothers Transport, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-04962) on July 21, 2017, disclosing
less than $1 million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Charles M. Walker presides over the case.  The Debtor is
represented by Gray Waldron, Esq., at Niarhos & Waldron, PLC.


8281 MERRILL ROAD: Cuts Unsecured Creditors' Recovery to $35K
-------------------------------------------------------------
8281 Merrill Road A, LLC, and 8281 Merrill Road B, LLC, amended the
disclosure statement in support of their Amended Chapter 11 plan to
provide that each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim,
classified in Class 7, will receive: (1) on each Distribution Date,
Distribution in an amount equal to its Pro Rata Share of $35,000
(i.e., $175,000 total, split across five Distribution Dates); or
(2) other treatment as may be consensually agreed to by the
applicable Debtor and the holder of an Allowed General Unsecured
Claim.

The prior Disclosure Statement provided that Each holder of an
Allowed General Unsecured Claim in Class 6 will receive on each
Distribution Date, Distribution in an amount equal to its Pro Rata
Share of the lesser of 1/5 of the total amount of Allowed General
Unsecured Claims; or $40,000 (i.e., $200,000 total,
split across five Distribution Dates); or (2) such other treatment
as may be consensually agreed to by the applicable Debtor and the
holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-17027-121.pdf

                  About 8281 Merrill Road A

8281 Merrill Road A, LLC, is a manager-managed limited liability
company with manager, Jacksonville Merrill Dealership, LLC, which
is itself managed by Daniel Rusche.  It filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-17027) on June 2,
2017.  In the petition signed by Tim O'Brien, manager, the Debtor
estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Raymond B. Ray presides over the
case.  Messana, PA, is the Debtor's counsel.


ACADEMY SPORTS: Bank Debt Trades at 20% Off
-------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Academy Sports &
Outdoors is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 80.36
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 1.80 percentage points from the
previous week. Academy Sports pays 400 basis points above LIBOR to
                                                                   
                     borrow under the $1.825 billion facility. The
bank loan matures on June 15, 2022. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'CCC+' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, June 8.                                    


ACOSTA INC: Bank Debt Trades at 20% Off
---------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Acosta Incorporated
is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 80.13
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents a decrease of 0.80 percentage points from the
previous week. Acosta Incorporated pays 325 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $2.055 billion facility. The bank loan
matures on September 26, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'CCC+' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, June 8.                                    


AMSTAR EMERGENCY: July 19 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Henry A. Callaway of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Alabama approved the disclosure statement
explaining Amstar Emergency Medical Services' plan of
reorganization.

The court noted several concerns regarding confirmation of the
Chapter 11 Plan, and continued the confirmation hearing to July 19,
2018, at 9:00 A.M. The hearing may be adjourned from time to time
without further notice other than an oral announcement by the Court
following one of the hearings.

Any and all objections to confirmation of the Amended Plan of
Reorganization must be in writing and must be filed with the Clerk
on or before July 12, 2018.

Under the plan, holders of allowed secured class 3 claims have
agreed to during the course of the case to adequate protection
payments. Debtor will continue the payments on a monthly basis from
gross revenues of the business until such claims are paid in full.
Holders of allowed class 3 claims will not receive distributions
from available funds.

The Debtor estimates that the total amount of General Unsecured
Claims, classified in Class 4, is approximately $508,056.40, which
amount may be increased or decreased based on claim contests.

Unless such holder agrees to other treatment, each holder of an
allowed class 4 unsecured claims will be paid a pro-rata
distribution in cash from the available funds after all allowed
administrative expenses claims, priority tax claims and allowed
secured claims receive the treatment they are entitled to under the
Plan, to the extent funds are available, and until such claims are
paid in full.  The Debtor anticipates holders of Class 4 claims to
start receiving distributions approximately 60 months after the
effective date and these claims will be paid in full within 96
months.

The Debtor proposes to make distributions from Available Funds,
defined to allow the Debtor to accumulate and reserve $50,000 from
the operations of its business as a cash reserve on which the
business can draw to pay both anticipated and unanticipated
ordinary course expenses.  All funds in excess of the $50,000
reserve would be seggregated into a separate account for
accumulated Available Funds.

The Debtor also plans to maker and sell its interest in the
prepetition Accounts Receivable, and several older non-operational
ambulances.  The Debtor estimates its prepetition accounts
receivables, after discounting for age and collectability, are
worth approximately $750,000.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/alsb17-03037-162.pdf

                    About Amstar Emergency
                       Medical Services

Amstar Emergency Medical Services Inc., based in Linden, Alabama,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No. 17-03037) on
Aug. 14, 2017.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000
in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The
petition was signed by Kevin Horne, president.  Lee R. Benton,
Esq., and Samuel Stephens, Esq., at Benton & Centeno, LLP, serve as
the Debtor's  bankruptcy counsel.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Alabama
ordered the appointment of an official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Amstar Emergency Medical
Services, Inc.


ANTHONY W. THORNTON: Court Allows Employment of SW as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtors Anthony and Elizabeth Thornton filed an amended application
to authorize them to employ Seiller Waterman LLC as attorneys nunc
pro tunc. The United States Trustee filed an objection to the
amended application and the Debtors filed a reply to the
application. Bankruptcy Judge Joan A. Lloyd grants in part and
denies in part the amended application.

On Feb. 26, 2018, SW filed its amended application to employ the
firm as counsel for the Debtors. In the amended application, SW
disclosed the payments made during the Chapter 7 case were from
Tennessee-Kentucky Trucking, Inc. There was also a payment made to
it by TKT on Feb. 8, 2018 for $1,057.20. Counsel stated that he did
not disclose TKT as the source of the payments because he believed
the relationship between TKT and the Debtors' daughter was known to
all parties for over a year. Also, until the UST raised concerns,
SW was not aware that the fees it received for its services in the
Chapter 7 case were from TKT. Counsel had believed the fees were
from Debtors' daughter. The UST objected to SW's Amended
Application contending the payments it received from TKT, was money
that was property of the Chapter 7 Estate and should have been
under the dominion and control of the Chapter 7 Trustee. The UST
contends SW should be sanctioned for failing to disclose the
payments from TKT. Although counsel ultimately disclosed TKT as the
source of the payments, the UST contends the disclosure was far too
late and that the element of "disinterestedness" required of
counsel for a debtor prohibits counsel's employment from going
forward in this Chapter 11 case.

The UST and counsel for Debtors both acknowledge that receipt of
the fees from TKT diverted property from the Chapter 7 estate and
rendered counsel for the Debtors as not disinterested. Any conflict
of interest, however, no longer existed once TKT owner and
Debtors’ daughter Leslie Randolph and her sister reimbursed all
fees paid by TKT. The Court determines that under the circumstances
of this case, an appropriate sanction for the failure of SW to
timely disclose the source of the payments as TKT during the
Chapter 7 case, is an order requiring SW to disgorge 20% of the
payments received by SW.

The Court's reasons for the sanction are based on the fact that the
Debtors did not adequately inform counsel that the funds SW
received post-retainer, were from TKT, rather than Debtor's
daughter. Counsel explained at the hearing that he did not discover
the true source of the funds due to his firm's bookkeeping
practices. Counsel explained that when checks are received for
payment for legal services at his firm, the firm's accounting
department circulates a daily ledger indicating the amount of funds
received and the case to which the funds are applied, but it does
contain a copy of the checks which would have alerted counsel to
the source of the funds. SW has since changed this practice to
include the source of the funds.

The Court believes the 20% sanction referenced above is an
appropriate sanction regarding the violation of the disclosure
requirements of 2016(b). The Court believes it would be unduly
harsh and would materially prejudice the Debtors to deny SW's
amended application to employ SW as their counsel going forward.
The Court does not find that the adverse economic interest to the
Chapter 7 Estate caused by the payment of fees by TKT in the
Chapter 7 case (and a payment of approximately $1,000 after the
conversion), under the circumstances of this case, make SW
disinterested in the current Chapter 11 case.

Accordingly, the Court grants in part and denies in part the
amended application of SW as counsel for the Debtors. SW, will as a
sanction, disgorge 20% of all legal fees they received during the
Chapter 7 proceeding and the Court will otherwise approve SW's
employment on behalf of Debtors going forward as set forth in its
amended application.

The bankruptcy case is in re: ANTHONY W. THORNTON, ELIZABETH C.
THORNTON, Debtor(s), Case No. 16-10090(1)(11) (Bankr. W.D. Ky.).

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated May 18, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2JEQz4M from Leagle.com.

Anthony W Thornton, Debtor, represented by David M. Cantor --
cantor@derbycitylaw.com -- Seiller Waterman LLC.

Elizabeth C Thornton, Joint Debtor, represented by David M. Cantor,
Seiller Waterman LLC.

Charles R. Merrill, US Trustee, represented by Tyler Yeager.

Anthony W. Thornton and Elizabeth C. Thornton filed for chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 16-10090) on Feb.
5, 2016.


BAL HARBOUR: Exclusive Filing Period Extended to Sept. 17
---------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Robert A. Mark of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, at the behest of Bal Harbour Quarzo,
LLC a/k/a Synergy Capital Group, LLC a/k/a Synergy Investments
Group, LLC, has extended the Exclusive Filing Period and the
Exclusive Solicitation Period through and including September 17,
2018 and November 13, 2018, respectively.

                   About Bal Harbour Quarzo

Bal Harbour Quarzo, LLC, also known as Synergy Capital Group, LLC,
also known as Synergy Investments Group, LLC, is a Florida limited
liability company based in Miami operating in the hotels and motels
industry.

Based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Bal Harbour Quarzo, LLC, through
its receiver, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No. 18-11793) on Feb. 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Drew M.
Dillworth, receiver appointed by Florida State Court, the Debtor is
estimated to have $10 million to $50 million in total assets and
$50 million to $100 million in total liabilities.  Judge Raymond B
Ray presides over the case.  

Eric J Silver, Esq., at Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff &
Sitterson, P.A., is the Debtor's counsel.  Meland Russin & Vazquez,
P.A., is the co-counsel.
Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., is the special counsel.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 21 on April 20, 2018, appointed three
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee retained Linda Leali, P.A.,
as counsel.


BG 1 LAZZARA: Taps Van Horn Law Group as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
BG 1 Lazzara, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to hire Van Horn Law Group as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors in the preparation of a
bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

     Chad Van Horn     $400
     Jay Molluso       $300
     Associates        $350
     Law Clerks        $175
     Paralegals        $175

Van Horn Law Group has required an initial retainer in the sum of
$10,783, plus the filing fee of $1,717.

Chad Van Horn, Esq., a partner at Van Horn Law Group, disclosed in
a court filing that he and his firm do not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Van Horn Law Group
     330 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 450
     Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Tel: 954-765-3166
     Fax: 954-756-7103
     Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

                      About BG 1 Lazzara LLC

BG 1 Lazzara, LLC is the owner of a 2009 75' Lazzara Motor Yacht,
Official Number 01258306, currently documented with US Coast Guard
under the name BG with a Hailing Port of Miami Beach, Florida.  The
company values the yacht at $1.97 million.

BG 1 Lazzara sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-14126) on April 9, 2018.

In the petition signed by Robert Genovese, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $1.97 million in assets and $1.13 million in liabilities.


Judge John K. Olson presides over the case.


BG BIG BOAT: Taps Van Horn Law Group as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
BG Big Boat Ltd. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to hire Van Horn Law Group as its
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors in the preparation of a
bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge these hourly rates:

         Chad Van Horn     $400
         Jay Molluso       $300
         Associates        $350
         Law Clerks        $175
         Paralegals        $175

Van Horn Law Group has required an initial retainer in the sum of
$10,783, plus the filing fee of $1,717.

Chad Van Horn, Esq., a partner at Van Horn Law Group, disclosed in
a court filing that he and his firm do not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Van Horn Law Group
     330 N Andrews Avenue, Suite 450
     Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
     Tel: 954-765-3166
     Fax: 954-756-7103
     Email: Chad@cvhlawgroup.com

                      About BG Big Boat Ltd.

BG Big Boat Ltd. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-16690) on June 1,
2018.  In the petition signed by Robert Genovese, managing member
of BG Big Yacht LLC, the Debtor disclosed $9 million in assets and
$649,008 in liabilities.  Judge Raymond B. Ray presides over the
case.


BIOAMBER INC: Obtains Court Approval for DIP Financing
------------------------------------------------------
BioAmber Inc. on June 18, 2018, disclosed that it has received
formal Quebec court approval for debtor-in-possession (DIP)
financing.  This funding will enable the execution of the Sales and
Investor Solicitation Process (SISP) that commenced on June 1,
2018, as well as the continued operations of the Sarnia
manufacturing facility.  

Highlights of the court ruling include:

   -- For the SISP, non-binding letters of intent ("LOIs") are now
due by June 29, 2018, with binding term sheets being due by July
31, 2018;

   -- The stay of proceedings against the petitioners has been
extended by the court to July 31, 2018, consistent with the timing
of the SISP;

   -- A CAN$3 million DIP financing, provided by Maynbridge
Capital, will be disbursed to BioAmber in two tranches: up to CAN$2
million can be disbursed through July 31 and an additional CAN$1
million can be disbursed after July 31, assuming the receipt of an
LOI.

"The approval of DIP financing is a positive milestone in the
continued restructuring of BioAmber.  Throughout the process,
BioAmber is successfully serving our customer base and continues to
supply high quality bio-succinic acid to companies around the
world.  We would like to thank our customers for their support and
willingness to work with us through this process.  With this
favorable court decision, we are pleased to be able to continue
operations in Sarnia to meet the growing demand we're seeing from
the market," stated Rick Eno, Chief Executive Officer.  "In the
longer term, BioAmber has a number of strategic and financial
investors evaluating an investment as part of the SISP.  We are
optimistic that the closing of a transaction will provide our
customers long term supply assurance from the Sarnia facility. We
will continue to provide updates throughout the process."

Pursuant to the Notice of Intent filing on May 4, 2018,
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. ("PWC") has been appointed as the
trustee in the proposal proceedings of BioAmber Sarnia Inc. and
BioAmber Canada Inc., and in that capacity is monitoring and
assisting BioAmber in its restructuring effort.  Please contact
Rick Eno, BioAmber, or Claudio Filippone, PWC, for information on
participation in the SISP.  

There can be no guarantee (i) that BioAmber will be successful in
securing further financing or achieving its restructuring
objectives, or (ii) that, in the event of the completion of its
restructuring process, BioAmber's shares will have any value.
Failure by BioAmber to achieve its financing and restructuring
goals will likely result in BioAmber and/or its subsidiaries filing
for bankruptcy.

                         About BioAmber

BioAmber (otcpk:BIOA) -- http://www.bio-amber.com/-- is a
renewable materials company.  Its innovative technology platform
combines biotechnology and catalysis to convert renewable feedstock
into building block materials that are used in a wide variety of
everyday products including plastics, paints, textiles, food
additives and personal care products.  


BRADLEY DISTRIBUTING: Talks With Colonial Funding Delay Plan Filing
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley Distributing, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania to further extend until July 5,
2018, the exclusive period during which only the Debtor can file a
Chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement.

As a Small Business, the Debtor's exclusivity period to file a
Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure Statement was set to expire on May
7, 2018, and was extended by court order to June 9, 2018.  

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on May 16, 2018, the
Debtor previously asked the Court to extend the deadline for the
Debtor to file a plan and disclosure statement until June 6, 2018.
The request was granted.

The Debtor tells the Court that the counsel needs some additional
time to prepare and file the Chapter 11 Plan and Disclosure
Statement and assures it that no creditors or parties in interest
will be prejudiced by extending the deadline.

The Debtor continues to operate as a Debtor in possession and
continues to meet the operating requirements of a Chapter 11
Debtor.  The Debtor has filed monthly financial reports for each
month of the Chapter 11 proceeding up through April 2018.  The
Debtor has paid all U.S. Trustee fees as they have come due since
the filing of the Chapter 11 case.

After preparing a proposed Plan and reviewing it with the Debtor,
counsel for the Debtor made a proposal with respect to plan
treatment to the secured creditor with first lien priority on the
assets of the Debtor in this matter, Colonial Funding Network, Inc.
Colonial made a counter-proposal and the two parties have been
engaged in discussion for consensual plan treatment.

The Debtor believes that having consensual plan treatment with
Colonial will allow for a much smoother confirmation process and
believes that with some additional time a consensus can most likely
be reached.

A copy of the Debtor's request is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb17-24513-84.pdf

                   About Bradley Distributing

Bradley Distributing, Inc., doing business as Community Beverage
Debtor, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
16-24513) on Nov. 8, 2017.  In the petition signed by Thomas C.
Bradley, Jr., president, the Debtor estimated $50,000 to $100,000
in assets and $100,000 to $500,000 in liabilities.  STEIDL &
STEINBERG is the Debtor's counsel.



BRADLEY J BARKER DDS: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Bradley J. Barker, DDS, P.C.
           dba Compassinate Health Care Services 77494A
           dba Pink Dental
           aka Barker Aesthetic Dentistry
           aka Smile Envy
        23501 Cinco Ranch Blvd., Suite B228
        Katy, TX 77494

Business Description: Bradley J. Barker, DDS, P.C. owns a dental
                      clinic in Katy, Texas, specializing in
                      family care, cosmetic dentistry, one-visit
                      crowns, implant dentistry, smile-whitening,
                      orthodontics, sedation dentistry, digital
                      impressions, gum disease, TMJ/jaw pain,
                      porcelain veneers, and athletic mouthguards.
                      The company maintains its website at
http://smile-envy.com.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 18, 2018

Case No.: 18-33298

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Texas (Houston)

Judge: Hon. David R Jones

Debtor's Counsel: Charles R. Chesnutt, Esq.
                  CHARLES R. CHESTNUTT P.C.
                  12222 Merit Drive, Suite 1200
                  Dallas, TX 75251
                  Tel: 972-248-7000
                  Fax: 972-559-1872
                  Email: cc@chapter7-11.com

Estimated Assets: $100,000 to $500,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Bradley J. Barker, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-33298.pdf


CALVIN GILL: Disclosures Conditionally OK'd; July 17 Plan Hearing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jerry C. Oldshue of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Alabama conditionally approved Calvin Gill
Construction Services, LLC's disclosure statement in support of its
plan of reorganization dated June 2, 2018.

July 10, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the Disclosure Statement and is fixed as the
last day for filing written acceptances or rejections of the Plan.

A confirmation hearing will be held on July 17, 2018, at 9:30 a.m.
Central Time. Objections to confirmation must be filed and served
not later than July 10, 2018.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that unsecured
creditors will recoup 100% at 5% under the plan.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
private construction financing and new value contributions by
Calvin Gil Sr., the Debtor's manager and sole member.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/alsb17-04724-83.pdf  

Mobile, Alabama-based Calvin Gill Construction Services, LLC, filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. S.D. Ala. Case No.
17-04724) on Dec. 16, 2017, estimating its assets and liabilities
at between $100,001 and $500,000. Kevin M. Ryan, Esq., at Ryan
Legal Services, Inc., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


CAMECO TECHNOLOGIES: Law Firm's Summary Judgment Award Reversed
---------------------------------------------------------------
The case captioned Christensen Law Office, PLLC, Respondent, v.
Serge Ngouambe, et al., Appellants, No. A17-1917 (Minn. App.) is a
dispute regarding attorney fees. Appellants, an individual and an
LLC, challenge the district court's award of summary judgment to
respondent law firm on respondent's breach-of-contract and
unjust-enrichment claims, as well as its award of attorney fees.
The Court of Appeals of Minnesota affirms the district court's
award of summary judgment and attorney fees to respondent on its
breach-of-contract claim against appellant individual Serge
Ngouambe. The Court, however, reverses the district court's award
of summary judgment and attorney fees to respondent on its
breach-of-contract claim against appellant Cameco Technologies LLC
and on its unjust-enrichment claims against both appellants. The
Court remands for further proceedings consistent with this
opinion.

In considering the district court's award of summary judgment
against Ngouambe, the Court concludes that although CLO did not
bring litigation in Ngouambe's name, it represented Ngouambe's
interests by filing and prosecuting Cameco's adversary complaint in
bankruptcy court. Ngouambe does not point to any evidence that CLO
filed the adversary complaint for any other reason. CLO's
performance of those services is consistent with the terms of the
attorney-fee agreement. Ngouambe breached that agreement by failing
to compensate CLO for its legal services. Because there is no
genuine issue of material fact precluding an award of summary
judgment for CLO on its breach-of-contract claim against Ngouambe,
the Court affirms that award.

Regarding CLO's unjust enrichment claim against Ngouambe, the Court
finds that because the attorney-fee agreement is an enforceable
contract between CLO and Ngouambe and CLO has recovered against
Ngouambe under that contract, CLO is not entitled to summary
judgment on its unjust-enrichment claim against Ngouambe as a
matter of law.

Cameco, on the other hand, contends that the district court "erred
in granting [CLO's] motion for summary judgment on its breach of
contract claim" against Cameco because Cameco was not "bound by the
attorney fee agreement." Cameco notes that "[t]he contract does not
identify [it] as a party" and the word "Cameco" does not appear
anywhere in the attorney-fee agreement.

In the district court, CLO did not argue that there was an oral
attorney-representation agreement. This court generally will not
consider issues that were not "presented and considered by the
[district] court in deciding the matter before it." "Nor may a
party obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated
below but under a different theory." Because CLO's theory that
Cameco breached an oral agreement with CLO was not presented to and
considered by the district court, and the record therefore is not
adequately developed, the Court does not consider this theory for
the first time on appeal. And because the language of the
attorney-fee agreement supports a reasonable conclusion that Cameco
was not a party to the agreement, the district court's award of
summary judgment to CLO on its breach-of-contract claim against
Cameco was improper.

Cameco also contends that the district court "erred in its
alternative granting of [CLO's] motion for summary judgment on its
unjust enrichment claim," arguing that "there is a genuine issue of
material fact as to whether [CLO] conferred a benefit on [Cameco]."
Specifically, Cameco argues that it did not receive a benefit from
CLO's legal services because "[r]egardless of the amount of
services [CLO] rendered to [it] . . ., they yielded no positive
results" as "[its] case was dismissed and Ngouambe's house was lost
to foreclosure."

In awarding CLO summary judgment against Cameco based on
unjust-enrichment, the district court does not appear to have
considered all of the relevant circumstances or to have
meaningfully weighed the equities. Instead, it supported its award
with a one-line conclusion: "[Cameco] accepted and knowingly
retained the benefit of [CLO's] services." The Court concludes that
there are genuine issues of material fact regarding CLO's
unjust-enrichment claim against Cameco and therefore reverse the
award of summary judgment on this claim.

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated May 21, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2ydmVSG from Leagle.com.

Carl E. Christensen -- carl@clawoffice.com -- Christensen Law
Office PLLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent.

Timothy R. Maher, Joseph D. Kantor, Guzior Armbrecht Maher,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellants.


CAREY CRUTCHER: Unsecured Creditors to Be Paid Annually for 5 Yrs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Carey Crutcher, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas a disclosure statement and plan of
reorganization.

The primary asset of the Debtor is a net operating loss valued at
$3,350,000.00 and inventory and equipment valued at $888,600.00.

Class 4 is unimpaired and consists of the unsecured claim of the
IRS in the amount of $36,653.13. This claim consists of taxes due
for 2012 and an unfiled return for 2013. The Debtor will have
twelve months from the effective date of the Plan to prepare and
file the unfiled return. As the Debtor has a net loss carryforward
of $3,350,000, the IRS claim for both filed and to be filed returns
will be offset against this carryforward.

Class 5 is impaired and consists of the claim of the John Alexander
Family Limited Partnership in the amount of $42,000.00. This claim
will be paid in equal annual, pro-rata installments over a five
year period. The Debtor reserves the right to pre-pay any annual
installment at any time.

Class 6 is impaired and consists of the unsecured claim of the
following entities:

   Chevron Business Card        $1,600.00
   R.W. Smith                   10,881.00
   Tax Account                     900.00

These claims will be paid in equal annual, pro-rata installments
over a five year period.  The Debtor reserves the right to pre-pay
any annual installment at any time.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-36696-41.pdf

                     About Carey Crutcher

Carey Crutcher, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-36696) on Dec. 13, 2017, estimating
under $50,000 in assets and under $500,000 in liabilities.  The
Company is in the Navigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and
Control Instruments Manufacturing industry.  The Debtor hired Julie
M. Koenig, Esq., at Cooper & Scully, P.C., as counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of Carey Crutcher, Inc., as of March 1, 2018,
according to the court docket.


CARLA CARRAWAY: Court Dismisses Bid to Value Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge S. Martin Teel Jr. entered an order dismissing
without prejudice Debtor Carla Carraway's motion to value
collateral, which seeks to fix the value of a car (securing a claim
of American Credit Acceptance, LLC) at $13,000 and to fix interest
payable at 6% per annum. This suggests that the debtor intends to
retain the car and, under a chapter 11 plan (which has not yet been
filed), to pay post-confirmation interest on the secured claim at
6% per annum.

The motion attaches a CarMax offer for the car of $13,000. The
motion, however, fails to identify the use to which the car will be
put, but by mentioning an interest rate to be paid, this suggests
that the debtor intends to retain the vehicle. Accordingly, a sale
is an event "that will not take place," and thus an offer of
purchase by CarMax is not an appropriate value to use. Instead,
under Rash, 520 U.S. at 965, the debtor must use a replacement
value, that is, what the debtor would pay to purchase the car for
the same proposed use as under a plan. Under Rash, 520 U.S. at 960,
the value is "the price a willing buyer in the debtor's trade,
business, or situation would pay to obtain like property from a
willing seller." If the debtor seeks to pursue a motion to value
anew, the debtor ought to be prepared to show a proper value.

The motion requests that the court determine "the pertinent
interest rate which would allow Creditor to receive the current
value of its claim, to be 6.00% per annum." The debtor appears to
contemplate paying the allowed secured claim overtime under the
"cram down" provisions of 11 U.S.C. section 1129(b)(2)(A)(i)(II).
However, such repayment would be via a plan, and it is
inappropriate to fix an interest rate for purposes of a plan (not
yet filed) via a motion. The appropriate interest rate to be paid
on the allowed secured claim will depend upon prevailing interest
rates as of the effective date of a plan, as well as such factors
as the period of time over which the secured claim is being paid.
Without a plan having been filed, it is inappropriate to fix an
interest rate. The debtor may file a plan proposing an interest
rate, giving the creditor an opportunity to object to the proposed
interest rate in the context of that plan. However, the issue ought
to be raised via a plan, not via a motion.

The bankruptcy case is In re CARLA CARRAWAY, (Chapter 11), Debtor,
Case No. 17-00630 (Bankr. D.C.).

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision and Order dated May 16,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2t2gSLe from Leagle.com.

Carla Carraway, Debtor In Possession, represented by Douglas N.
Gottron -- gottron@morrispalerm.com  -- Morris Palerm, LLC.

U. S. Trustee for Region Four, U.S. Trustee, represented by Joseph
A. Guzinski, U. S. Trustee's Office.

Carla Carraway filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D.C. Case No. 16-00630) on Nov. 13, 2017, and is represented by
Douglas N. Gottron, Esq. of Morris Palerm, LLC.


CC CARE: Hires Prospect Resources as Energy Consultant
------------------------------------------------------
CC Care, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois to
employ Prospect Resources, Inc., as energy procurement consultant
to the Debtors.

CC Care requires Prospect Resources to:

   -- investigate, identify and recommend to the Debtors, the
      best suppliers of Natural Gas and Electricity for the
      Debtor based on the Debtor's consumption patter, need and
      desire for stability in pricing, and tolerance for risk in
      respect to such pricing;

   -- act on behalf of the Debtors in connection will all
      purchases of Natural Gas and Electricity consumed by the
      Debtors;

   -- provide consulting and continuous monitoring services of
      deliveries, storage levels, and commodity prices;

   -- serve as the exclusive consultant and purchasing agent to
      the Debtors with respect to purchases and storage by the
      Debtors of Natural Gas and Electricity.

Prospect Resources will be paid an annual fee of $1,250.

Prospect Resources have a pre-Petition claim against the Debtors in
the collective sum of $22,250.

Isaac Shkop, partner of Prospect Resources, Inc., assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Prospect Resources can be reached at:

     Isaac Shkop
     PROSPECT RESOURCES, INC.
     8170 McCormick, Suite 107
     Skokie, IL 60076
     Tel: (847) 673-1959

                      About CC Care, LLC

CC Care, LLC, and its affiliates are Delaware limited liability
companies owned by JLM Financial Healthcare, LP, that operate
long-term care facilities that provide nursing, healthcare,
therapeutic and social services to the chronically ill with a
diagnosis of mental illness.

The operating entities own these nursing care facilities:

  Entity     Facility Name/Location
  ------     ----------------------
CC Care   Community Care Center, Chicago, Illinois
BT Care   Bourbonnais Terrace Nursing Home, Bourbonnais, Ill.
CT Care   Crestwood Terrace Nursing Center, Crestwood, Ill.
FT Care   Frankfort Terrace Nursing Center, Frankfort, Ill.
JT Care   Joliet Terrace Nursing Center, Joliet, Illinois
KT Care   Kankakee Terrance Nursing Center, Bourbonnais, Ill.
SV Care   Southview Manor, Chicago, Illinois
TN Care   Terrace Nursing Home, Waukegan, Illinois
WCT Care  West Chicago Terrace Nursing Home, West Chicago, Ill.

On Oct. 30, 2017, Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions were filed by CC
Care, LLC, doing business as Community Care Center (Bankr. N.D.
Ill. Lead Case No. 17-32406), and BT Bourbonnais Care, LLC, doing
business as Bourbonnais Terrace Nursing Home (Case No. 17-32411),
CT Care, LLC (17-32417), FT Care, LLC (17-32423), JT Care, LLC
(17-32425), KT Care, LLC (17-32427), SV Care, LLC (17-32430), TN
Care, LLC (17-32429), WCT Care, LLC (17-32433), JLM Financial
Healthcare, LP (17-32421).  Patrick Laffey, their manager and
designated representative, signed the petitions.

The cases are jointly administered under Case No. 17-32406 and
assigned to Judge Janet S. Baer.

At the time of filing, CC Care estimated $1 million to $10 million
in assets and liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Burke Warren Mackay & Serritella P.C. and Crane,
Simon, Clar & Dan as bankruptcy attorneys; Development Specialists,
Inc., as financial advisor; Meyer Magence, Attorney at Law, as
special counsel; and Templin Healthcare Accounting Services, LLP,
as accountant.

On Nov. 27, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


CEC ENTERTAINMENT: Bank Debt Trades at 6% Off
---------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which CEC Entertainment
Incorporated is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 93.95
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 0.75 percentage points from the
previous week. CEC Entertainment pays 325 basis points above LIBOR
to borrow under the $760 million facility. The bank loan matures on
February 14, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'B2' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, June 8.                                    


CENVEO INC: New Components in Global Settlement Disclosed in Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cenveo, Inc. and affiliates filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York a third amended disclosure
statement for its third amended joint chapter 11 plan of
reorganization dated June 8, 2018.

This latest filing adds several components of the Global Settlement
entered into by the Debtors the Committee, and the Ad Hoc First
Lien Committee (including Brigade Capital Management, LP). The
additional components are:

   * payment of certain reasonable and documented fees and expenses
incurred by Brigade and its professionals through the Effective
Date in the aggregate amount of $1.25 million;

   * payment of $400,000 to the Second Lien Notes Indenture Trustee
in connection with its Stipulated Administrative Expense Settlement
Claim.

The latest plan also provides that the Debtors or the Reorganized
Debtors, must pay, on the Effective Date, all then-outstanding
unpaid Stipulated Administrative Expense Settlement Claims. The
Debtors, the Committee, and the U.S. Trustee may object to the
amounts sought in the Stipulated Administrative Expenses Settlement
Claims solely with respect to the reasonableness of any such fees
and expenses during the ten-day period following notice thereof.
Any objection that is not promptly resolved will be subject to
resolution by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to a Final Order. All
amounts not objected to must be paid promptly and a reserve shall
be established for any amounts objected to and subject to
resolution of the Bankruptcy Court. To the extent that any
objection is sustained by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to a Final
Order, as soon as practicable following entry of such Final Order,
the applicable party must transfer Cash in the applicable amount
back to the Reorganized Debtors. Nothing in the Plan or the
Confirmation Order will in any way affect or diminish the rights of
the Second Lien Notes Indenture Trustee and the Unsecured Notes
Indenture Trustee to assert the Second Lien Notes Indenture Trustee
Charging Lien and the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee Charging
Lien, respectively, against any distributions to Holders of Second
Lien Notes Claims and Holders of Unsecured Notes Claims,
respectively, with respect to any unpaid fees and expenses or other
amounts payable to the Second Lien Notes Indenture Trustee and the
Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee pursuant to the Second Lien Notes
Indenture and Unsecured Notes Indenture, respectively.

A copy of the Redlined Version of the Third Amended Disclosure
Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-22178-475.pdf

A copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-22178-463.pdf

                    About Cenveo, Inc.

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, Cenveo (NASDAQ:CVO) --
http://www.cenveo.com/-- is a global provider of print and related
resources, offering world-class solutions in the areas of custom
labels, envelopes, commercial print, content management and
publisher solutions.  The Company provides a one-stop offering
through services ranging from design and content management to
fulfillment and distribution.  With a worldwide distribution
platform, the Company says it delivers quality solutions and
services every day to its more than 100,000 customers.

After reaching an agreement with holders of a majority of its first
lien debt to support a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, Cenveo
Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in
White Plains, New York (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-22178) on
Feb. 2, 2018.  The Chapter 11 filing does not include foreign
entities, such as those located in India.

As of Dec. 31, 2017, Cenveo disclosed total assets of $789,547,000
and total debt of $1,426,133,000.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as counsel; Rothschild Inc.
as investment banker; Zolfo Cooper LLC as restructuring advisor;
and Prime Clerk LLC as notice, claims & balloting agent, and
administrative advisor.  Greenhill & Co., LLC, as co-financial
advisor and co-investment banker.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.  The committee hired
Lowenstein Sandler LLP as its bankruptcy counsel; and FTI
Consulting, Inc., as its financial advisor.


CHIEF POWER: Bank Debt Trades at 13% Off
----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Chief Power Finance
LLC is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 87
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 1.95 percentage points from the
previous week. Chief Power pays 475 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $351 million facility. The bank loan matures on
December 31, 2020. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, June 8.


CLINTON NURSERIES: VFI Master Lease Not True Lease, Court Rules
---------------------------------------------------------------
Varilease Finance, Inc. filed a motion to compel Debtors' Clinton
Nurseries, Inc. and affiliates' compliance with 11 U.S.C. section
365(d)(5)). After an initial hearing on April 26, 2018, it was
stipulated upon the record that the Court would adjudicate the
issues raised in two stages. In stage one, the Court will review
and address a threshold issue of whether this matter involves a
"true lease" or a secured transaction based upon the application of
the "Bright Line" test. If the transaction involves a true lease, a
stage two hearing, briefing and argument will be scheduled to
address the appropriate relief to be accorded the Movant. If the
Bright Line test otherwise fails to affirmatively answer the true
lease inquiry, the Court will proceed to a stage two evidentiary
hearing, briefing and argument to complete the record and address
any remaining unresolved issues.

Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi finds that under the Bright Line
test the Master Lease appears not to be a true lease, but rather a
disguised financing transaction that creates a security interest.
The Court will now move to a stage two evidentiary hearing,
briefing and argument to complete the record and address any
remaining unresolved issues.

On July 16, 2015, Varilease, as lessor, and Clinton Nurseries, Inc.
and Clinton Nurseries of Maryland, Inc., as co-lessees, entered
into a master lease agreement ("Master Lease"), whereby Varilease
purportedly leased to CNI and CNM certain personal property to be
described in schedules to be incorporated into the Master Lease.

The analysis under UCC Section 1-203 proceeds in two steps. The
first step is the "Bright Line" test and, if the agreement appears
to be a lease under that test, courts proceed to a second step, the
"Economics of the Transaction."  "The Bright-Line Test requires the
Court to determine whether the contractual terms of the Agreement,
either on their face or as applied, bear certain characteristics
the statute defines as conclusive evidence that a security interest
was created."

The first element of UCC Section 1-203(b) analysis is met here.
There can be no dispute that pursuant to the terms of the Master
Lease, the Debtors were to pay Varilease for the entire term of the
Master Lease. Varilease depends on the Debtors' claimed
noncompliance with this obligation to assert a right to recover the
Stipulated Loss Value, as defined in the Master Lease, of the goods
and services contemplated by the Master Lease.

The second element of UCC Section 1-203(b) analysis here is also
probative of a secured transaction. Nowhere in the Master Lease is
there language granting the Debtors the option of terminating their
obligations under the Master Lease. On the contrary, pursuant to
Section 3(b), the agreement is "non-cancelable" and
"non-terminable" outside of very limited end-of-term options
outlined in Section 19(b), none of which give the Debtors an
opportunity to terminate the Master Lease early.

Finally, the third element of UCC Section 1-203(b) analysis applied
to the facts of this case is equally probative of a secured
transaction. While the underlying Master Lease does not provide to
the Debtors an option to become owners of the relevant personal
property, Section 10e of each of the operative Schedules provides
for a $1 purchase option under certain conditions. It is well
settled that $1 is "nominal consideration." Thus, because the
Debtors had the option to purchase under the Master Lease for the
"nominal additional consideration" of $1, the third element of the
Section 1-203(b) analysis indicates that the instrument at issue
here is a secured transaction.

Because the UCC Section 1-203(b) elements are each met under the
Bright Line Test, the Master Lease appears not to be a true lease,
but rather a disguised financing transaction that creates a
security interest.

The bankruptcy case is in re: In re: CLINTON NURSERIES, INC.,
CLINTON NURSERIES OF MARYLAND, INC., CLINTON NURSERIES OF FLORIDA,
INC., TRIEM LLC, Chapter 11, Debtors, Case Nos. 17-31897 (JJT),
17-31898 (JJT), 17-31899 (JJT), 17-31900 (JJT), Jointly
Administered Under Case No. 17-31897 (JJT) (Bankr. D. Conn.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Stage One Ruling dated May 17, 2018
is available at https://bit.ly/2HI7ZvH from Leagle.com.

Clinton Nurseries, Inc., Clinton Nurseries of Maryland, Inc.,
Clinton Nurseries of Florida, Inc. & Triem LLC, Debtors,
represented by Christopher H. Blau, Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C., Eric
A. Henzy -- ehenzy@zeislaw.com -- Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C. & Patrick
R. Linsey -- plinsey@zeislaw.com -- Zeisler & Zeisler PC.

U. S. Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Steven E. Mackey,
Office of the U.S. Trustee, Kim L. McCabe, Office of the U.S.
Trustee & Kari A. Mitchell, Office of the United States Trustee.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor Committee,
represented by Lauren McNair -- lmcnair@gs-lawfirm.com -- Green &
Sklarz LLC & Jeffrey M. Sklarz -- jmsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com -- Green
& Sklarz LLC.

                  About Clinton Nurseries

Founded in 1921, Clinton Nurseries, Inc., operates nurseries that
produce ornamental plants and other nursery products.  The company
grows trees, flowering shrubs, roses, ornamental grasses & ground
covers, perennials, annuals, herbs and vegetables. Clinton
Nurseries is based in Westbrook, Connecticut.

Clinton Nurseries and its affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Conn. Case No. 17-31897) on Dec. 18, 2017.  David
Richards, president, signed the petition.  The cases are jointly
administered under Case No. 17-31897.

At the time of filing, Clinton Nurseries estimated its assets and
liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.

Judge James J. Tancredi presides over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors.


CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Amends CBCA Plan of Arrangement
--------------------------------------------------------
In connection with the proposed recapitalization transaction
described in Concordia International Corp.'s management information
circular dated May 15, 2018 and to be implemented pursuant to a
plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act,
Concordia has, with the support of the applicable parties to the
support agreement entered into in connection with the
Recapitalization Transaction, finalized the amendments to the
articles of Concordia to become effective pursuant to the CBCA Plan
on the implementation of the Recapitalization Transaction, and made
certain limited amendments to its CBCA Plan to be voted on by
debtholders and shareholders at the meetings scheduled to be held
on June 19, 2018.

The Articles Amendments reflect certain aspects of the governance
and other arrangements relating to Concordia as further described
in the Governance Term Sheet attached as Appendix Q to the
Circular.

The substantially final version of the Articles Amendments will be
posted for review on the Company's website at www.concordiarx.com
and on Kingsdale Advisors' website at
http://www.kingsdaleadvisors.com/concordiadocuments.html. The
final version of the Articles Amendments will be posted under the
Corporation's profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at
www.sec.gov.

The amendments to the CBCA Plan include amendments to attach the
Articles Amendments as a schedule to the CBCA Plan, to amend
certain steps contained in the CBCA Plan to provide that
consideration payable under the CBCA Plan to holders of the
Company's affected unsecured debt will be applied first in respect
of the principal amount of such unsecured debt obligations, and
second in respect of the accrued but unpaid interest on such
unsecured debt obligations, to remove the Subordinated Promissory
Note from the unsecured debt affected by the CBCA Plan, to provide
for the adoption and approval of new general by-laws for Concordia
and to provide for the appointment of new directors of Concordia on
the implementation of the Recapitalization Transaction.

The amended version of the CBCA Plan will be posted for review on
the Company's website and Kingsdale Advisors' website.

Concordia intends to also make available for review substantially
final versions of (i) the investor rights agreement to be entered
into on implementation of the Recapitalization Transaction by
Concordia and the parties participating in its private placement as
further described in the Circular, (ii) the indenture pursuant to
which the new senior secured notes will be issued by Concordia
pursuant to the Recapitalization Transaction and (iii) the senior
secured term loan agreement pursuant to which the new senior
secured term loans will be issued by Concordia pursuant to the
Recapitalization Transaction.

         Reminder of Meeting Date, Sanction Hearing Date
                     and Election Deadline

As previously disclosed, the Company will be holding meetings of
its debtholders and shareholders at the offices of Goodmans LLP at
333 Bay Street, Suite 3400, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2S7 on June 19,
2018.

The hearing to seek Court approval of the CBCA Plan is currently
scheduled for June 26, 2018, or such other date as may be set by
the Court.  As part of seeking Court approval of the
Recapitalization Transaction, the Company will seek a permanent
waiver of any and all: (a) defaults resulting from the commencement
of its CBCA proceedings, and (b) third party change of control
provisions that may be triggered by the implementation of the
Recapitalization Transaction, as well as the release of all equity
claims against Concordia other than the Company's existing equity
class action claims (the recovery in respect of such existing
equity class action claims being limited to recovery as against the
Company's applicable insurance policies).

Holders of the Company's secured term loans that are entitled to
elect the type and/or currency of new senior secured debt they will
receive pursuant to the CBCA Plan (as described in the Circular)
are reminded that the deadline for making such elections is 5:00
p.m. Toronto time on June 28, 2018.  Further information on these
elections is contained in the Circular.

Any questions or requests for further information regarding the
process for voting at the Meetings and/or making the applicable
elections under the CBCA Plan, or any related maters, should be
directed to Kingsdale Advisors by calling toll free at
1‐866‐581‐0506 or 416‐867‐2272, by email at
corpaction@kingsdaleadvisors.com, or on Kingsdale Advisors' website
at http://www.kingsdaleadvisors.com/concordiadocuments.html.

                      About Concordia

Based in Ontario, Canada, Concordia -- http://www.concordiarx.com/
-- is an international specialty pharmaceutical company with a
diversified portfolio of more than 200 patented and off-patent
products, and sales in more than 90 countries.  Going forward, the
Company is focused on becoming a leader in European specialty,
off-patent medicines.  Concordia operates out of facilities in
Oakville, Ontario and, through its subsidiaries, operates out
facilities in Oakville, Ontario and, through its subsidiaries,
operates out of facilities in Bridgetown, Barbados; London, England
and Mumbai, India.

Concordia reported a net loss of US$1.59 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of US$1.31 billion for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Concordia had
US$2.32 billion in total assets, US$4.30 billion in total
liabilities and a total shareholders' deficit of US$1.97 billion.

                           *    *    *

Moody's Investors Service downgraded the Corporate Family Rating of
Concordia to 'Ca' from 'Caa3'.  "Concordia's Ca Corporate Family
Rating reflects its very high financial leverage, ongoing operating
headwinds, and imminent risk of a debt restructuring.  Moody's
estimates adjusted debt/EBITDA will exceed 9.0x over the next 12
months as earnings decline on a year over year basis," as reported
by the TCR on Oct. 27, 2017.

In October 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Concordia to 'SD' from 'CCC-' and removed the rating from
CreditWatch, where it was placed with negative implications on
Sept. 18, 2017.  "The downgrade follows Concordia International's
announcement that it failed to make the Oct. 16, 2016, interest
payment on the 7% senior unsecured notes due 2023.  Given our view
of the company's debt level as unsustainable, and ongoing
restructuring discussions, we do not expect the company to make a
payment within the grace period."


CORRECT CLAIM: Unsecureds to Get 6.8% to100% Under Amended Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
Correct Claim Public Adjusters, LLC, amended the disclosure
statement explaining its Chapter 11 plan to provide that all
allowed general unsecured claims, except for the claim of BVF Fund
II, LLC, are impaired, and will recover a minimum of 6.8% payout
percentage.

The Amended Disclosure Statement says that general unsecured
claims, classified in Class 6, will be paid between August 1, 2019,
and November 30, 2021.  The percentage ultimately paid ranges from
6.8% to 100%, depending on assumptions. If all of the Debtor's
litigation is successful and the claim of Fund II survives in full,
then Debtor estimates that up to 86% of the allowed claim amounts
will be paid. If none of the litigation is successful and the claim
of Fund II survives in full, then 6.8% of the allowed claims will
be paid. If all of the litigation is successful and the claim of
Fund II is reduced to zero, then 100% of the allowed claims will be
paid. If none of the litigation is successful and the claim of Fund
II is reduced to zero, then 42% of the allowed claims will be paid.


BVF Fund II, LLC's claim, classified in Class 7, is impaired and
will be paid be paid between August 1, 2019, and November 30, 2021.
Fund II will recoup a minimum of 6.8% payout percentage.  Fund
II's claim is also subject to offset.  Otherwise, the claim will be
paid with all available operating cash flow up to the amount of the
allowed claim that is not offset.  The Consumer Report Agreement
(CRA) is rejected and any power of attorney granted to Fund II is
revoked.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-16483-261.pdf

              About Correct Claim Public Adjusters

Based in El Paso, Texas, Correct Claim Public Adjusters, LLC --
http://www.correctclaim.com/-- is a licensed public adjuster that
helps homeowners in determining the value of their claim, reviewing
their existing insurance policy to establish coverage, and
documenting the claim for submission to their insurer.  The
company's experience includes both broad-based events such as
hurricanes, hailstorms, wildfires, explosions, or tornados, and
single-property incidents including fires, theft, or
plumbing-related water damage.  Correct Claim is also based in the
Rio Grande Valley of Texas and in Denver, Colorado.  Correct Claim
was founded by Sergio De La Canal.

Correct Claim Public Adjusters, based in San Antonio, Texas, filed
a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-16483) on Dec. 6,
2017.  In the petition signed by Sergio De La Canal, its managing
member, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in assets and
$1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Laurel E. Davis presides over the case.  

Robert Atkinson, Esq., at Atkinson Law Associates, Ltd., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


DARDEN-GREEN: Carrier-Weathertech to Get 88.13% Under Amended Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Darden-Green Co., Inc., filed with U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama an amended plan of reorganization.

Class 5 Small Secured Claims, which includes unsecured claims
either scheduled or filed in an amount of $22,000 or less, will
receive a one-time cash payment in the amount of 25% of their
allowed claim.  The total amount projected to be paid to satisfy
all claims within Class 5 is $16,117.04.  The payments to claimants
within this Class will be made 30 days following the entry of the
order confirming the Plan.

Class 6 includes large unsecured claims of Carrier-Weathertech in
the amount of $798,248.86 and General Insulation in the amount of
$107,162.72.  Members of this Class will share pro rata in a
distribution of funds in the total amount of $2,199 each month for
a total distribution to claimants in this Class of $32,985 during
the first 15 months of their notes.  Carrier-Weathertech will
receive 88.13% of each monthly funding or $1,938 per month while
General Insulation will receive 11.86% of each monthly funding or
$261.

A full-text copy of the Amended Plan is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb16-01957-199.pdf

                    About Darden-Green

Darden-Green Co., Inc., based in Birmingham, Alabama, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 16-01957) on May 12,
2016.  The Hon. Tamara O Mitchell presides over the case.  Thomas
E. Reynolds, Esq., at Reynolds Legal Solutions, LLC, serves as
Chapter 11 counsel.  In its petition, the Debtor listed total
assets of $2.13 million and total liabilities of $2.31 million. The
petition was signed by Bobbie Green, general manager.


DAVID HANKS: Has $239K Offer for Tipton County Property
-------------------------------------------------------
David L. Hanks and Sandra B. Hanks ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Western District of Tennessee to authorize the sale of
their interest in the real property known as 0 Sadler School Road
in Tipton County, Tennessee, comprising approximately 92 acres of
agricultural land, to Andrew Curtis Hanks and Rilla Reese-Hanks for
$239,200.

The parties have entered into for the sale of the Real Estate.

The Real Estate was listed for sale by the Debtor's duly authorized
real estate agent, Randal Lankford.  Mr. Lankford has actively
marketed the property since that time through multiple channels.
The subject property had been listed for sale by another real
estate agent for an extended period of time before the case was
filed.

The Debtors have negotiated a sale price of $239,200 and entered
into the Lot/Land Purchase and Sale Agreement subject to the
Court's approval.  Although the Buyers share the same last name as
the Debtors, they are not related and are not insiders.

The Real Estate is encumbered by a Deed of Trust and Assignment of
Rents held by First Citizens National Bank.  At this time the
Debtors do not know if the bank will consent to the sale.  Tipton
County holds a claim against the Real Estate for property taxes
accrued to date.

Upon closing of the sale approved by the Court, valid, perfected
and unavoidable liens, claims, and encumbrances will attach to the
sale proceeds to the same extent, and in the same priority, as the
prepetition liens, claims and encumbrances, which will be paid at
closing along with usual and customary closing costs and expenses
of sale, including a 6% real estate commission to Randal Lankford.

The Debtors believe a sale of his interest in the Real Estate as
proposed will produce the highest value to the Estate.

As the Property has been marketed for an extended period of time,
the Debtors submit that ample cause exists to justify a waiver of
the 14-day stay imposed by Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h), to the extent
that it applies.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/David_Hanks_72_Sales.pdf

David L. Hanks and Sandra B. Hanks sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-27085) on Aug. 14, 2017.  The Debtor
tapped Russell W. Savory, Esq., at Beard & Savory, PLLC, as
counsel.

On Oct. 19, 2017, the Court appointed Randal Lankford as real
estate agent.


DDC GROUP: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: DDC Group, Inc.
        350 South Grand Ave., Suite 1670
        Los Angeles, CA 90071

Business Description: DDC Group, Inc. is a full-service general
                      contractor in Los Angeles, California,
                      specializing in expedited development
                      service for restaurants & retailers.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 18, 2018

Case No.: 18-17029

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Judge: Hon. Sheri Bluebond

Debtor's Counsel: M Jonathan Hayes, Esq.
                  SIMON RESNIK HAYES LLP
                  15233 Ventura Blvd., Suite 250
                  Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
                  Tel: (818) 783-6251
                  Fax: (818) 827-4919
                  E-mail: jhayes@srhlawfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Slava Borisov, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-17029.pdf


DEBORAH VINSON: Must Return $105K Deposit to Stirlings, K. Robinson
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Stirlings, LLC, and Kathleen Robinson, the plaintiffs in the
adversary proceeding captioned STIRLINGS, LLC and KATHLEEN
ROBINSON, Plaintiffs, v. DEBORAH ANN VINSON, Defendant, Adv. Proc.
No. 17-1025 (Bankr. E.D. La.) seek declaratory relief that the
debtor, Deborah Ann Vinson had no interest in a deposit in the
amount of $105,000 that the plaintiffs had put up in connection
with an offer to purchase real estate owned by Vinson. The disputed
$105,000 deposit is currently being held by the Clerk of Court in
the registry of the Louisiana Civil District Court, Parish of
Orleans. In the interest of judicial economy, the court
consolidated a subsequently filed adversarial proceeding (Adversary
Proceeding No. 17-1042) with this proceeding on August 4, 2017. In
the second adversary proceeding, Vinson requests turnover of the
same $105,000 deposit and objects to the proof of claim filed by
Stirlings and/or Robinson in Vinson's Chapter 11 bankruptcy case.

Upon analysis, Bankruptcy Judge Jerry A. Brown holds that the
plaintiffs are entitled to the return of the deposit and that the
amended proof of claim filed on July 12, 2017 was not an amendment
of the March 20, 2017 proof of claim, but rather a new and untimely
filed proof of claim.

Vinson's argument centers around the idea that Stirlings and/or
Robinson somehow misled or tricked Vinson into thinking that
Stirlings was buying the house on St. Charles Avenue for
residential use. Vinson's argument focuses on two things: 1) that
the use of the Louisiana Residential Property Purchase Agreement
form for the offer to buy the house indicated that Stirlings was
making a residential offer; and 2) that Stirlings did not fulfill
its obligation under the purchase agreement to make good faith
effort to secure the financing in a timely manner, and related to
this, that Stirlings sought commercial financing rather than a
residential mortgage, also indicated that Stirlings was not in good
faith.

After reviewing the entire record, the court finds that there are
no facts that clearly establish Stirlings' alleged intent to
misrepresent its intentions or commit fraud on Vinson such that
Vinson would be tricked into thinking that Stirlings' was seeking
to use the property as a residence. To the contrary, the record
establishes that Stirlings was forthright about its intention to
use the house as a bed and breakfast. When Kathleen Robinson signed
the purchase agreement she signed in her capacity as agent for
Stirlings, LLC and subsequently asked Vinson for assistance in
getting the property rezoned for mixed use as a bed and breakfast
before the closing of the sale, which Vinson declined to do. At
trial, Vinson admitted that she was made aware of the Stirlings'
intentions to use the property as a bed and breakfast no later than
five days after the purchase agreement had been signed. The court
concludes that there is a substantial amount of evidence contrary
to Vinson's theory that Stirlings was trying to hide its intention
to use the property commercially.

The court next turns to Vinson's argument that Stirlings breached
the contract by its failure to apply for financing that conformed
to the purchase agreement.

Contrary to the arguments of Vinson, no mention is made purchase
agreement that the buyer must seek a residential mortgage loan.
Just because the form used was a Louisiana Residential Property
Purchase Agreement, does not automatically include a requirement
that a residential mortgage loan be sought by the buyer. As long as
the loan sought fit the financing requirements of the purchase
agreement, it does not matter whether the financing party called it
a residential loan, a commercial loan, or gave it some other
designation. The court holds that Stirlings was not required by the
plain terms of the purchase agreement to seek a residential
mortgage loan. Nor was she prohibited from seeking a commercial
loan, or a loan by any other name that met the conditions in the
purchase agreement.

With regard to amended proof of claim filed on July 12, 2017 by
Stirlings and/or Robinson, the court finds that the amendment
should not be permitted. The second, and untimely filed proof of
claim, asserts new claims that although related to the first proof
of claim insofar as they arise out of the same failed real estate
transaction, ask for additional amounts of money, under new
theories of law. The additional amounts in the second proof of
claim also would significantly impair any recovery for the other
unsecured creditors. Because the proposed amendment is not just to
cure a technical defect in the first filed claim, or to increase an
unknown amount previously asserted in the first filed claim, the
court exercises its discretion and holds that the second proof of
claim is untimely filed. Because the second proof of claim was
untimely filed, the court need not rule as to the claims for
stipulated damages, attorney's fees and the other claims. Other
than the claim as to the $105,000 deposit, the remaining parts of
the claim are disallowed in their entirety.

The bankruptcy case is in re: DEBORAH ANN VINSON, Chapter 11,
Debtor, Case No. 16-12818 (Bankr. E.D. La.).

A full-text copy of the Memorandum Opinion dated May 22, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2JSK9lR from Leagle.com.

Stirlings, LLC & Kathleen Robinson, Plaintiffs, represented by
Scott M. Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua, LLC, D. Skylar Rosenbloom
-- srosenbloolm@fishmanhaygood.com -- Fishman Haygood, Skylar
Rosenbloom, Fishman Haygood, LLP, Blair Schilling & Sharonda R.
Williams – swilliams@fishmanhaygood.com -- Fishman Haygood LLP.

Kathleen Robinson & Stirlings, LLC, Counter-Defendants, represented
by Scott M. Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua, LLC, D. Skylar
Rosenbloom, Fishman Haygood, Skylar Rosenbloom, Fishman Haygood,
LLP, Blair Schilling & Sharonda R. Williams, Fishman Haygood LLP.

Deborah Ann Vinson sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. La.
Case No. 16-12818) on Nov. 17, 2016.  The Debtor rapped Darryl T.
Landwehr, Esq., as counsel.


DEL MONTE: Bank Debt Trades at 17% Off
--------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Del Monte Pacific
Ltd. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 82.63
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 0.76 percentage points from the
previous week. Del Monte pays 325 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $710 million facility. The bank loan matures on
February 18, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'CCC-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, June 8.                                    


DELMAC LLC: Tital Commercial Buying Griswold Property for $900K
---------------------------------------------------------------
Delmac, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Connecticut to authorize the sale of the real property located at
134 Preston Road, Griswold, Connecticut to Titan Commercial
Development, LLC for $900,000, pursuant to the terms of their Real
Property Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated Nov. 30, 2017.

As more particularized in the Agreement, said purchase is part of a
comprehensive real estate development transaction of which the
Property is an integral part.

The liens and claims against the Property as they appear of record
are:

     (a) Inchoate real estate tax lien in favor of the Town of
Griswold in the principal amount of $6,165.

     (b) Mortgage from Delmac, LLC to Michael F. Vocatura, Trustee
of the Michael F. Vocatura Trust Agreement dated Sept. 23, 1998 in
the amount of $1,075,000 dated Nov. 16, 2007 and recorded Nov. 19,
2007 in Volume 308, Page 1162; assigned to Griswold - Comecticut
Route No. 164 Development Associates, LLC by Assignment of Mortgage
dated May 7, 2013 and recorded May 7, 2013 in Volume 348, Page 644
of the Griswold Land Records.

     (c) Mortgage from Delmac, LLC and Gregory T. Mackin to Lee
Daily, also known as Lee Daly and Al Zabbo in the amount of $27,500
dated April 19, 2011 and recorded April 20, 2011 in Volume 334,
Page 484 of the Griswold Land Records.

     (d) Mortgage from Delmac, LLC to Hitesh Patel in the amount of
$55,000 dated May 13, 2011 and recorded May 13, 2011 in Volume 334,
Page 888 of the Griswold Land Records.

     (e) Certificate of Attachment of Real Estate in favor of
Homeowners Finance Co. and against Delmac, LLC in the amount of
$170,000 dated March 18, 2013 and recorded March 18, 2013 in Volume
347, Page 402 of the Griswold Land Records.

     (f) Judgment Lien in favor of Stadia Engineering Associates,
Inc. and against Delmac, LLC in the amount of $37,500 dated Oct.
11, 2013 and recorded October 15, 2013 in Volume 351, Page 943 of
the Griswold Land Records.

On Feb. 27, 2018, the Debtor and the first mortgage holder,
Griswold-Connecticut Route No. 164 Development Associates, LLC,
entered into a Stipulation which was attached to a Motion for
Authority to Compromise Claims and for Approval of a Stipulation
and Settlement Agreement By and Between Delmac, LLC and
Griswold-Connecticut Route No. 164 Development Associates, LLC.
Through the Compromise Motion and accompanying Stipulation, the
Debtor and Griswold stipulated that the fair market value of the
Property is $950,000.  It was also stipulated that Griswold would
be entitled to an unsecured claim in the amount of $901,736.

Delmac represents that the sale of the Property to Titan for the
sum of $900,000 is in the best interest of this estate and
maximizes the value of this asset.  It does not believe that an
auction sale would result in a recovery to the estate in excess of
the proposed sale price and certainly a sale to another buyer would
not be in the best interests of the creditor body of the estate.
The current buyer proposes to pursue a project known as Medberry
Landing in which it will develop 111 senior assisted living units.
The Debtor has been offered to do the site work improvements on the
Property which will result in a future dividend being paid to the
unsecured creditors of this estate.  The Debtor believes that the
sale of the Property to Titan is supported by good and sound
business reasons.

Delmac asks an Order of the Court authorizing it to sell the
Property at a private sale to Titan, free and clear of the
interests, claims and liens of the aforesaid Respondents, with said
interests, claims and liens attaching to the proceeds of sale.

                       About Delmac LLC

Based in Jewett City, Connecticut, Delmac, LLC, specializes in
non-residential building construction business.  Delmac sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Conn.
Case No. 17-21848) on Dec. 4, 2017.  In the petition signed by
Gregory T. Mackin, its managing member, the Debtor estimated assets
of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  The Law Offices of Ronald I. Chorches LLC is the Debtor's
legal counsel.



DOUBLE EAGLE: GBT Opposes Approval of Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------
Gibsland Bank & Trust (GBT) objects to the disclosure statement
explaining the Chapter 11 plan of Double Eagle Energy Services,
LLC.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owed GBT approximately
$11,021,053.  As of GBT's proposed plan treatment, the Debtor
proposes to continue to accrue at the contractual rate of interest
and be paid off $35,000 per month until paid in full.  GBT
complained that the amounts owing to GBT as stated in the
Disclosure Statement and Plan are incorrect, being understated by
$247,411.

Wells Fargo Equipment Finance Inc., owed in excess of $250,000,
joins in GBT's objection to the Disclosure Statement.

GBT is represented by:

     E. Keith Carter, Esq.
     ROGERS, CARTER & PAYNE, LLC
     4415 Thornhill, Second Floor, Suite A
     Shreveport, LA 71106
     Tel: (318) 861-1111
     Fax: (318) 868-2323
     E-mail: ekcarter@rogerscarterlaw.com

Wells Fargo is represented by:

     Joseph P. Hebert, Esq.
     LISKOW & LEWIS
     822 Harding Street
     Lafayette, LA 70503
     Tel: (337) 232-7424
     Fax: (337) 267-2399
     E-mail: jphebert@liskow.com

              About Double Eagle Energy Services

Founded in 2006, Double Eagle Energy Services, a company based in
Alexandria, Louisiana, provides general contracting services
including constructing water and sewer mains.

Double Eagle Energy Services filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
W.D. La. Case No. 17-80717) on July 17, 2017.  In the petition
signed by Joe Ratcliff or Bob Ratcliff, its owners, the Debtor
indicated $12.41 million in total assets and $13.18 million in
total liabilities.  Judge John W. Kolwe presides over the case.
Bradley L. Drell, Esq., at Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  Colvin, Smith & McKay
is the Debtor's special counsel.


DPW HOLDINGS: CEO Ault Will Receive a $400,000 Annual Salary
------------------------------------------------------------
DPW Holdings, Inc., has entered into a 10-year executive employment
agreement with Milton C. Ault, III, to serve as chief executive
officer of the Company.  The Board of Directors of the Company
subsequently approved the Agreement.  For his services, Mr. Ault
will be paid a base salary of $400,000 per annum.

Further, Mr. Ault is entitled to receive equity participation as
follows: (A) a grant of restricted stock in the aggregate amount of
1,000,000 shares of common stock, which shares will vest ratably
over 48 months beginning on Jan. 1, 2020, provided, however, that
those shares may, in whole or in part, in the discretion of the
Compensation Committee, vest immediately upon the filing of an
Annual Report on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange
Commission that shows that the Company's revenues for the
applicable fiscal year reached or exceeded $100,000,000;
notwithstanding the foregoing, before the Company accelerates any
such vesting, the Company's Compensation Committee must prior
thereto have obtained the consent of Mr. Ault, which consent may be
withheld in his discretion, and (B) an option to purchase 500,000
shares of common stock of the Company at a per share price equal to
$0.80, which option will vest over 60 months.

In 2016, before Mr. Ault's arrival, DPW was on the verge of being
delisted from the NYSE American due to sustained losses and a
shortfall in equity.  Mr. Ault spearheaded the purchase by Philou
Ventures, LLC which invested $1,500,000 to buy a significant
interest in the Company and which subsequently invested another
$1,250,000.

During his relatively brief tenure with the Company, Mr. Ault has
caused DPW to take a number of steps, including the completion of
several significant strategic acquisitions, resulting in the
following accomplishments:

   * Increased market capitalization by an order of magnitude;

   * On target to increase revenue seven-fold;

   * Quadrupled Total Equity;

   * Engineered a $50 million purchase order from MTIX; and

   * Saved the NYSE American Listing

The Company acknowledges that these initiatives have been neither
easy nor inexpensive to accomplish but were necessary to maintain
the Company's eligibility for continued listing on the NYSE
American and to sustain its ability to achieve its long-term
objectives.  Going forward, DPW expects there to be additional
financings and acquisitions but that these will occur at a more
measured pace.  As the business grows, the Company will continue to
focus on aggressive top line growth but will also recognize the
need to strive for other measures of financial health including
ROI, net income and positive cash flow.

None of Mr. Ault's future equity awards will be earned through the
mere passage of time, but only upon approval of the Agreement by
the Company's stockholders and DPW's achievement of these
significant financial targets:

   * 35% year over year revenue growth;

   * GAAP net income of 5% of revenues; and

   * Positive cash flow

Upon meeting or exceeding these targets, and if there is an
increase in the net market capitalization of DPW, Mr. Ault will
receive common shares calculated as a percentage of that increase.
Net market cap is defined as shares outstanding times the closing
market price, minus any equity financings during the target year.

As he has envisioned, Mr. Ault is transitioning the Company from a
small entity operating in the power supply market to a holding
company with a diverse portfolio of productive assets including
cryptocurrency mining, hospitality, aerospace/defense, medical and
commercial electronics development and manufacturing, high-tech
original equipment manufacturing, consumer self-service financial
services and small business commercial lending, with more to come.

The members of the Committee have spent many months researching
best practices for executive compensation, reviewing plans at
similar public companies, studying independent consultants'
reports, conducting interviews with stockholders and holding many
internal meetings, most of which Mr. Ault did not attend.  The
Committee firmly believes that Mr. Ault, who is already a
significant stockholder by virtue of having invested considerable
personal resources in the Company and who not only expects to
contribute additional capital to the Company over time but devotes
virtually all his time and energy to executing his strategy of
long-term shareholder value creation, will have his interests
completely aligned with all stockholders.  The Board of Directors
fully supports and agrees with the recommendation of the Committee
and has therefore approved the Agreement; as a result, the
Agreement is presently in full force excepting only its equity
compensation provisions, which will take effect if and when
approved by the Company's stockholders, which approval will be
sought at the Company's next annual meeting.

A full-text copy of the Employment Agreement is available for free
at https://is.gd/Yo6k5B

                       About DPW Holdings

Headquartered in Fremont, California, DPW Holdings, Inc.,  formerly
known as Digital Power Corp. -- http://www.DPWHoldings.com/-- is a
diversified holding company that, through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Coolisys Technologies, Inc., is dedicated to providing
technology-based solutions where innovation is the main driver for
mission-critical applications and lifesaving services.  Coolisys'
growth strategy targets core markets that are characterized by
"high barriers to entry" and include specialized products and
services not likely to be commoditized.  Coolisys through its
portfolio companies develops and manufactures cutting-edge resonant
switching power topologies, specialized complex high-frequency
radio frequency (RF) and microwave detector-log video amplifiers,
very high-frequency filters and naval power conversion and
distribution equipment.  Coolisys services the defense, aerospace,
medical and industrial sectors.

DPW Holdings incurred a net loss of $10.89 million in 2017
following a net loss of $1.12 million in 2016.  As of March 31,
2018, DPW Holdings had $38.49 million in total assets, $16.66
million in total liabilities and $21.83 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Marcum
LLP, in New York, on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating
that the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has
incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to
meet its obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


DPW HOLDINGS: Plans E-Payments Joint Venture with QPAGOS & IPS
--------------------------------------------------------------
DPW Holdings, Inc.'s wholly-owned subsidiary, Digital Power
Lending, LLC, entered into an agreement to organize and operate a
joint venture with QPAGOS and Innovative Payment Systems, Inc.  In
accordance with the terms of the Agreement, DPL, QPAGOS and IPS
will form a Delaware limited liability company to be called
"Innovative e-Payment Solutions, LLC" for the purpose of conducting
an electronic payments business in the State of California by
acquiring, deploying, marketing, managing and operating a network
of approximately 1,000 self-service kiosks to be purchased from
QPAGOS.  DPL, QPAGOS and IPS are expected to enter into an
operating agreement for Innovative e-Payment Solutions, and related
agreements, on July 1, 2018 or such other date as may be mutually
agreed whereby such parties plan to contribute to Innovative
e-Payment Solutions their respective initial capital contributions.
For its 51% interest in Innovative e-Payment Solutions, DPL
intends to contribute cash and a promissory note in the aggregate
amount of $2.5 million.

On the Closing Date, DPL and Innovative e-Payment Solutions expect
to enter into a credit facility agreement whereby DPL will provide
Innovative e-Payment Solutions, subject to certain terms and
conditions, including subject to DPL's ability to obtain financing,
with long-term financing to purchase and license QPAGOS
self-service kiosks in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) the
amount to purchase 500 kiosks or (ii) $2,500,000.  In addition, on
the Closing Date QPAGOS and Innovative e-Payment Solutions expect
to enter into an exclusive supply agreement pursuant to which
Innovative e-Payment Solutions will purchase the kiosks from
QPAGOS.  Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the Agreement
will terminate if the parties do not enter into the credit facility
agreement and supply agreement on July 1, 2018, which is a
condition of Closing.

A full-text copy of the Agreement is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/Qx6ZXQ

The parties can be reached at:

     in the case of DPL, to:

     Digital Power Lending, LLC
     201 Shipyard Way
     Newport Beach, California 92663
     Attention: William Corbett, Manager

     with a copy to:

     Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard Smith, LLP
     333 Bush Street, Suite 1100
     San Francisco, CA  94104
     Attention: Daniel B. Eng

     in the case of QPAGOS, to:

     QPAGOS

     Paseo del la Reforma 404 Piso 15 PH
     Col. Juarez, Del. Cuauhtemoc
     Mexico, D.F. C.P. 06600
     Attention: Mr. Gaston Pereira

     with a copy to:

     Gracin & Marlow, LLP
     The Chrysler Building
     405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor
     New York, New York 10174
     Attention:  Hank Gracin, Esq.

                       About DPW Holdings

Headquartered in Fremont, California, DPW Holdings, Inc.,  formerly
known as Digital Power Corp. -- http://www.DPWHoldings.com/-- is a
diversified holding company that, through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Coolisys Technologies, Inc., is dedicated to providing
technology-based solutions where innovation is the main driver for
mission-critical applications and lifesaving services.  Coolisys'
growth strategy targets core markets that are characterized by
"high barriers to entry" and include specialized products and
services not likely to be commoditized.  Coolisys through its
portfolio companies develops and manufactures cutting-edge resonant
switching power topologies, specialized complex high-frequency
radio frequency (RF) and microwave detector-log video amplifiers,
very high-frequency filters and naval power conversion and
distribution equipment.  Coolisys services the defense, aerospace,
medical and industrial sectors.

DPW Holdings incurred a net loss of $10.89 million in 2017
following a net loss of $1.12 million in 2016.  As of March 31,
2018, DPW Holdings had $38.49 million in total assets, $16.66
million in total liabilities and $21.83 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Marcum
LLP, in New York, on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating
that the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has
incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to
meet its obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


EDEN HOME: Creditor's Panel Hires Martin & Drought as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Eden Home, Inc.
has filed an amended application with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Texas seeking approval to hire Martin &
Drought, P.C., as counsel to the Committee.

The Committee requires Martin & Drought to:

   a. advise the Committee on its rights, obligations, and powers
      in the bankruptcy case and as required by the Bankruptcy
      Code;

   b. appear before the Bankruptcy Court and others on the
      Committee's behalf on all matters involving these
      bankruptcy estates, the Committee, and this case;

   c. prepare and file for the Committee all necessary
      applications, motions, pleadings, orders, reports and other
      legal papers, and appear on the Committee's behalf in
      proceedings instituted by, against, or involving the
      Debtor, the Committee, or this case;

   d. represent the Committee on any potential claim against or
      by third parties;

   e. assist the Committee in investigating and analyzing the
      acts, liabilities, and financial condition of the Debtor,
      the Debtor's assets and business operations, including
      disposition of those assets, and any other matters relevant
      to this case and the interests of unsecured creditors;

   f. assist the Committee in examining claims filed against the
      Debtor to determine whether any asserted claims are
      objectionable or otherwise improper;

   g. advise the Committee on matters relevant to this case and
      the formulation of a plan;

   h. advise the Committee on any potential sale or other
      disposition of any estate asset;

   i. consult with the Debtor, their representatives, and
      professionals regarding the administration of this case;
      and

   j. perform all other legal services necessary for and
      requested by the Committee in connection with this case and
      the Committee's duties therein.

Martin & Drought will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                    $350 to $650
     Associates                  $250 to $300
     Paraprofessionals           $100 to $150

Martin & Drought will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael G. Colvard, a partner at Martin & Drought, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not
creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the Debtor; (b)
has not been, within two years before the date of the filing of the
Debtor's chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees of
the Debtor; and (c) does not have an interest materially adverse to
the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or equity
security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship
to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtor, or for any other
reason.

Martin & Drought can be reached at:

         Michael G. Colvard, Esq.
         MARTIN & DROUGHT, P.C.
         Bank of America Plaza, 25th Floor
         300 Convent Street
         San Antonio, TX 78205
         Tel: (210) 227-7591
         Fax: (210) 227-7924
         E-mail: mcolvard@mdtlaw.com

                       About Eden Home

Located in New Braunfels, Texas, Eden Home, Inc., d/b/a EdenHill
Communities -- https://www.edenhill.org/ -- is a not-for-profit,
faith-based organization that provides independent living,
affordable housing, assisted living, skilled nursing and
rehabilitation, long-term care and memory care services. The
EdenHill Communities Transportation Department provides ADA
services in support of seniors and individuals with disabilities.

Eden Home, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case
No. 18-50608) on March 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Laurence P. Dahl, CEO and executive director, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Craig A. Gargotta is the case judge.

Dykema Cox Smith is the Debtor's counsel; Langley & Banack, and
Gravely & Pearson, L.L.P., as special counsels; Cushman & Wakefield
as real estate broker. Cushman & Wakefield has entered into a
Co-Broker Agreement with CF Commercial Brokerage, LLC d/b/a San
Antonio Commercial Advisors.

On March 26, 2018, the U.S. Trustee appointed Susan N. Goodman as
the Patient Care Ombudsman in the case.

On May 30, 2018, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of
Eden Home, Inc.  was appointed by the Bankruptcy Court.  The
Committee retained Martin & Drought, P.C., as counsel.



ELEMENTS BEHAVIORAL: $65M Credit Bid to Open Auction
----------------------------------------------------
EBH Topco, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all assets
to Project Build Behavioral Health, LLC ("Prepetition First Lien
Lender and DIP Lender") to for $65 million, plus the Buyers'
contract cure costs for the Assigned Contracts.

The Debtors, through their investment banker, Jefferies, LLC,
engaged in an extensive prepetition marketing process.  In
addition, they have retained, subject to court approval, Houlihan
Lokey as their investment banker in these Chapter 11 Cases.  As
part of the proposed sale process, the Debtors, through Houlihan
Lokey and their professionals, will continue to engage in the
robust marketing effort for the Debtors' assets, which started well
before the Petition Date, continuing to contact both financial and
strategic investors regarding a potential sale process, including
all parties contacted prior to the commencement of the cases.

The Debtors believe a prompt sale of the Assets represents the best
option available to maximize value for all stakeholders in these
Chapter 11 Cases.  Moreover, it is critical for them to execute on
a sale transaction as expeditiously as possible, as they're
utilizing the Prepetition First Lien Lender's and DIP Lender's cash
collateral and additional financing in order to conduct the sale
process.  Therefore, time is of the essence.

The Prepetition First Lien Lender and DIP Lender will serve as the
Stalking Horse Bidder pursuant to the proposed Letter of Intent,
which contemplates the entry into a definitive Asset Purchase
Agreement with the Stalking Horse Bidder no later than June 1,
2018.  Pursuant to the LOI, the Stalking Horse Bidder is entitled
to: (a) reimbursement of the Stalking Horse Bidder's reasonable and
actual fees and expenses incurred as the Stalking Horse Bidder up
to $325,000; and (b) initial overbid protection in the amount of
$100,000.  Furthermore, they wil ask entry of an order at the
conclusion of the Sale Hearing.  By the Motion, the Debtors ask
that the Court approves the following general timeline, with the
assumption that the Court will enter an order granting the Motion
on shortened notice.

To optimally and expeditiously solicit, receive, and evaluate bids
in a fair and accessible manner, the Debtors have developed and
proposed the Bidding Procedures.  They're developed to permit an
expedited sale process, to promote participation and active
bidding, and to ensure that the Debtors receive the highest or
otherwise best offer for the Assets.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Good Faith Deposit: 10% of the proposed purchase price

     b. Bid Deadline: June 26, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (ET)

     c. Right to Credit Bid: The Stalking Horse Bidder (for itself
and in its capacity as Prepetition First Lien Lender and DIP
Lender) will be deemed to be a Qualified Bidder and is not required
to make any Good Faith Deposit.

     d. Cancellation of the Auction. If the Debtors do not receive
a Qualified Bid (other than the Credit Bid) or otherwise determines
not to proceed with the Auction, the Debtors may elect not to
conduct the Auction and may cancel the Auction.  If the Debtors
have received only the Credit Bid, the Debtors may declare the
Credit Bid the Successful Bid without conducting the Auction.

     e. Auction: The Auction, if necessary, will be held at the
offices of Polsinelli PC, 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1101,
Wilmington, Delaware 19801 on June 27, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (ET), or
such other location as identified by the Debtors after notice to
all Qualified Bidders.

     f. Minimum Overbid Increment: $100,000

     g. Sale Objection Deadline: Objections to the Sale will be
filed and served no later than 4:00 p.m. (ET) on June 21, 2018.

     h. Sale Hearing: Consistent with the Court's availability and
schedule, the Sale Hearing will commence on June 28, 2018.

     i. Contract Cure Objection Deadline: Objections to the
potential assumption and assignment of any Contract will be filed
and served no later than June 21, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Debtors are also asking approval of the procedures to
facilitate the fair and orderly assumption and assignment of the
Contracts in connection with the Sale.  Pursuant to the Bidding
Procedures Order, the notice of the proposed assumption and
assignment of the Contracts to the Successful Bidder, the proposed
cure amounts related thereto, and the right, procedures, and
deadlines for objecting thereto, will be provided in separate
notices, to be sent to the applicable Contract Counterparties.  

The Debtors submit that it is appropriate to sell the Assets free
and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances, and interests, with
any such Claims and Interests attaching to the net sale proceeds of
the Transferred Assets, as and to the extent applicable.

Finally, the Debtors have requested that the Court waives the
10-day stay period under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).

A copy of the Letter of Intent and the Bidding Procedures attached
to the Motion is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/EBH_Topco_19_Sales.pdf

               About Elements Behavioral Health

Long Beach, California-based EBH Topco, LLC along with its
subsidiaries -- http://www.elementsbehavioralhealth.com/-- are
providers of behavioral health services and residential drug and
alcohol addiction treatment.  The Elements Behavioral Health(R)
family of programs offers comprehensive, innovative treatment for
substance abuse, sexual addiction, trauma, eating disorders, and
other mental health disorders.  

EBH Topco, LLC (Lead Case), Elements Behavioral Health, Inc., and
certain of its affiliates sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
on May 23, 2018 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 18-11214).  

In the petition signed by CRO Martin McGahan, the Debtors estimated
$50 million to $100 million in assets and under $100 million to
$500 million in liabilities.

Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the Debtors' cases.

Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., Stephen J.
Astringer, Esq., and Jeremy R. Johnson, at Polsinelli PC, serve as
counsel to the Debtors.  Alvarez & Marsal LLC acts as restructuring
advisor to the Debtors; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., is the
investment banker; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., is the
notice and claims agent.

The Debtors have requested procedural consolidation and joint
administration of the Chapter 11 cases.


ELEMENTS BEHAVIORAL: Hires Houlihan Lokey as Investment Bankers
---------------------------------------------------------------
EBH Topco, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ
Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker to the Debtors.

EBH Topco requires Houlihan Lokey to:

   a. assist the Debtors in the development and distribution of
      selected information, documents and other materials,
      including, if appropriate, advise the Debtors in the
      preparation of an offering memorandum;

   b. solicit and evaluate indications of interest and proposals
      regarding any Transactions from current and/or potential
      equity investors, acquirers and/or strategic partners
      (collectively, "Investors");

   c. assist the Debtors with the development, structuring,
      negotiation, and implementation of any Transactions,
      including participating as a representative of the Debtors
      in negotiations with creditors and other parties involved
      in any Transactions;

   d. advise and attend meetings of the Debtors' Board of
      Directors, creditor groups, official constituencies, and
      other interested parties, as the Debtors and Houlihan Lokey
      determine to be necessary or desirable;

   e. provide expert advice and testimony regarding financial
      matters related to any Transaction, if necessary; and

   f. provide such other financial advisory and investment
      banking services as may be agreed upon by Houlihan Lokey
      and the Debtors.

Houlihan Lokey will be paid as follows:

   (a) Initial Fee: The Debtors will pay Houlihan Lokey in June
       2018 (timing subject to approval by the Court) a
       nonrefundable cash fee of $100,000 (the "Initial Fee");

   (b) Monthly Fee: Upon the third monthly anniversary of the
       Effective Date of the Houlihan Lokey Engagement Letter,
       and on every subsequent monthly anniversary of the
       Effective Date during the term of the Houlihan Lokey
       Engagement Letter, the Debtors shall pay Houlihan Lokey in
       advance, without notice or invoice, a nonrefundable cash
       fee of $100,000 (the "Monthly Fee"); and

   (c) Transaction Fees: Upon the closing of each Transaction,
       Houlihan Lokey shall earn, and the Debtors shall thereupon
       pay immediately and directly from the gross proceeds of
       such Transaction, as a cost of such Transaction, a cash
       fee (the "Transaction Fee") based upon Aggregate Gross
       Consideration ("AGC"), calculated as follows:

       For AGC up to $70 million:               $1,000,000, plus
       For AGC from $70 million to $80 million: 2.0% of such
                                                incremental AGC,
                                                plus
       For AGC from $80 million to $90 million: 3.0% of such
                                                incremental AGC,
                                                plus
       For AGC above $90 million:               5.0% of such
                                                incremental AGC.

       If more than one Transaction is consummated, Houlihan
       Lokey will be compensated based on the AGC from all
       Transactions, calculated in the manner set forth above;
       subject, however, to an additional $350,000 for the second
       and each subsequent Transaction.

Christopher Di Mauro, managing director of Houlihan Lokey, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Houlihan Lokey can be reached at:

     Christopher Di Mauro
     HOULIHAN LOKEY CAPITAL, INC.
     10250 Constellation Blvd., 5th Floor
     Los Angeles, CA 90067
     Tel: (310) 553--8871

                     About EBH Topco, LLC

Long Beach, California-based EBH Topco, LLC along with its
subsidiaries -- http://www.elementsbehavioralhealth.com/-- are
providers of behavioral health services and residential drug and
alcohol addiction treatment. The Elements Behavioral Health(R)
family of programs offers comprehensive, innovative treatment for
substance abuse, sexual addiction, trauma, eating disorders, and
other mental health disorders.

EBH Topco, LLC (Lead Case), Elements Behavioral Health, Inc., and
certain of its affiliates sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
on May 23, 2018 (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 18-11214).

In the petition signed by CRO Martin McGahan, the Debtors estimated
$50 million to $100 million in assets and under $100 million to
$500 million in liabilities.

Hon. Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the Debtors' cases.

Christopher A. Ward, Esq., Shanti M. Katona, Esq., Stephen J.
Astringer, Esq., and Jeremy R. Johnson, at Polsinelli PC, serve as
counsel to the Debtors. Alvarez & Marsal LLC acts as restructuring
advisor to the Debtors; Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc., is the
investment banker; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., is the
notice and claims agent.


ERIN ENERGY: Creditor's Panel Hires Pachulski Stang as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Erin Energy
Corporation, and its debtor-affiliates, seeks authorization from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to
retain Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, as counsel to the
Committee.

The Committee requires Pachulski Stang to:

   a. assist, advise, and represent the Committee in its
      consultations with the Debtors regarding the administration
      of the bankruptcy cases;

   b. assist, advise, and represent the Committee in analyzing
      the Debtors' assets and liabilities, investigate the
      extent and validity of liens and participate in and
      reviewing any proposed asset sales, any asset dispositions,
      financing arrangements and cash collateral stipulations or
      proceedings;

   c. assist, advise, and represent the Committee in any manner
      relevant to reviewing and determining the Debtors' rights
      and obligations under leases and other executory contracts;

   d. assist, advise, and represent the Committee in
      investigating the acts, conduct, assets, liabilities, and
      financial condition of the Debtors, the Debtors' operations
      and the desirability of the continuance of any portion
      of those operations, and any other matters relevant to
      these cases or to the formulation of a plan;

   e. assist, advise, and represent the Committee in its
      participation in the negotiation, formulation, and drafting
      of a plan of liquidation or reorganization;

   f. advise the Committee on the issues concerning the
      appointment of a trustee or examiner under section 1104 of
      the Bankruptcy Code;

   g. assist, advise, and represent the Committee in
      understanding its powers and its duties under the
      Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules and in performing
      other services as are in the interests of those
      represented by the Committee;

   h. assist, advise, and represent the Committee in the
      evaluation of claims and on any litigation matters,
      including avoidance actions and claims against directors
      and officers and any other party; and

   i. provide such other services to the Committee as may be
      necessary or appropriate in these cases.

Pachulski Stang will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                $650 to $1,295
     Of Counsel              $595 to $1,025
     Associates              $495 to $595
     Paraprofessionals       $295 to $395

Pachulski Stang will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, the
following is provided in response to the request for additional
information:

   Question:  Did you agree to any variations from, or
              alternatives to, your standard or customary billing
              arrangements for this engagement?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  Do any of the professionals included in this
              engagement vary their rate based on the geographic
              location of the bankruptcy case?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  If you represented the client in the 12 months
              prepetition, disclose your billing rates and
              material financial terms for the prepetition
              engagement, including any adjustments during the 12
              months prepetition. If your billing rates and
              material financial terms have changed postpetition,
              explain the difference and the reasons for the
              difference.

   Response:  Not applicable.

   Question:  Has your client approved your prospective budget
              and staffing plan, and, if so for what budget
              period?

   Response:  Not applicable.

Ira D. Kharasch, partner of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a)
is not creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the
Debtors; (b) has not been, within two years before the date of the
filing of the Debtors' chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or
employees of the Debtors; and (c) does not have an interest
materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of
creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any direct or
indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the
Debtors, or for any other reason.

Pachulski Stang can be reached at:

     Ira D. Kharasch, Esq.
     PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP
     10100 Santa Monica Blvd., 13th Fl.
     Los Angeles, CA 90067-4100
     Tel: (310) 277-6910

                 About Erin Energy Corporation

Houston, Texas-based Erin Energy Corporation (NYSE American:ERN)
(JSE:ERN) -- http://www.erinenergy.com/-- is an independent oil
and gas exploration and production company focused on energy
resources in sub-Saharan Africa. Its asset portfolio consists of
five licenses across three countries covering an area of 6,100
square kilometers (~1.5 million acres), including current
production and other exploration projects offshore Nigeria, as well
as exploration licenses offshore Ghana and The Gambia.

As of Dec. 31, 2017, Erin Energy had $251.1 million in total
assets, $613.9 million in total liabilities and a total
stockholders' deficiency of $362.8 million.

Erin Energy Corporation and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
18-32106) on April 25, 2018. CEO Femi Ayoade signed the petitions.

As of March 31, 2018, the Debtors disclosed $247,535,000 in assets
and $628,724,000 in liabilities.

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Okin & Adams LLP as their legal counsel, and The
Loev Law Firm, PC as their securities law counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 7 on May 16, 2018,
appointed the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 cases.  The Committee retained Pachulski Stang Ziehl &
Jones LLP, as counsel.



FAMILY FOR LIFE: Identifies Post-Confirmation Management
--------------------------------------------------------
The Family for Life Foundation amended the disclosure statement
explaining its Chapter 11 Plan to identify the management of the
Debtor under the confirmed plan as follows:

   Aaron Stephens - Food Service & Maintenance Supervisor $900/wk

   Jasmine Bonner - Pre-K Teacher $600/wk

   Juliet Bonner - HR Supervisor & Enrollments $750/wk

   Henry R. Freeman - Consultant to Child Care Operations $150/wk

   Brittany Stephens - Floor Supervisor $$500/wk

   Allxandria DeVaughn - Clerical $300/wk

   Helemn Barclay-Jones - Operations Manager $400/wk

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohnb17-14759-76.pdf

             About The Family for Life Foundation

The Family For Life Foundation filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 17-14759) on Aug. 12, 2017,
estimating under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by Glenn E. Forbes, Esq., at Forbes Law LLC.


FEGS HEALTH: District Court Dismisses Beverly Antwi Suit
--------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Edgardo Ramos granted Defendant Health & Human
Services Systems (Centers) F.E.G.S.'s motion to dismiss Plaintiff's
complaint captioned BEVERLY DIANE ANTWI, Plaintiff, v. HEALTH AND
HUMAN SYSTEMS (CENTERS) F.E.G.S., Defendant, No. 13 Civ. 835 (ER)
(S.D.N.Y.).

The action, one of two brought in the Court by pro se litigant
Beverly Diane Antwi, arises from claims that Defendant Health &
Human Services Systems (Centers) F.E.G.S., a private non-profit
health center where she resides and receives care, unlawfully
hospitalized her against her will, denied her benefits from
government programs and misappropriated federal funds intended for
her use. Liberally construed, the Complaint asserts claims against
FEGS for gross negligence, "psychological abuse" and violations of
her human and constitutional rights.

The Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules
12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Alternatively, the Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to
Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

To prevail on a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a
plaintiff must establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that
(1) defendant deprived her of a right secured by the Constitution
or the laws of the United States and (2) in doing so, the defendant
acted under color of state law.

Prior to Plaintiff's residence at FEGS, she was involuntarily
committed to the state-operated Bronx Psychiatric Center. She was
later discharged to a TLR and eventually referred to Defendant's
facility in the Bronx. Id. She voluntarily signed an occupancy
agreement with FEGS and acknowledged that she had a right to refuse
treatment and services. The State did not compel any of the conduct
that Plaintiff claims violated her rights. In addition, a
sufficiently close nexus between the State and the private conduct
alleged here does not exist because there are no facts to indicate
that the State and FEGS are in any way interdependent or
affiliated. Lastly, the private conduct does not consist of
activity that has traditionally been the exclusive prerogative of
the State. Because Plaintiff cannot establish state action, her §
1983 claim must be dismissed.

In addition to her section 1983 claim, Plaintiff's complaint may be
liberally construed to allege claims for gross negligence and
"psychological abuse," under state law. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
section 1367(c)(3), when a court has dismissed all of the claims
over which it has original jurisdiction, it may decline to exercise
jurisdiction over any non-federal claims over which it could have
exercised supplemental jurisdiction. Subject matter jurisdiction in
the instant action is based on federal question jurisdiction.
Having dismissed all of Plaintiff's federal claims under Rule
12(b)(6), it would be inappropriate to adjudicate her state law
claims. Therefore, all non-federal claims in the complaint are
dismissed as well.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 18,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2sYhbXg from Leagle.com.

Beverly Diane Antwi, Plaintiff, pro se.

FEGS Health and Human Services System, Defendant, represented by
Adonaid Casado Medina , Vigorito, Barker, Porter, & Patterson, LLP
& David Bloom -- dbloom@kbrlaw.com -- Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP.


FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS: Bid for Preliminary Injunction vs FERC OK'd
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Alan M. Koschik issued a memorandum opinion
supporting his order granting FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. and
FirstEnergy Generation, LLC's ex parte motion for temporary
restraining order and preliminary injunction against the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission in the case captioned FIRSTENERGY
SOLUTIONS CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISION, et al. Defendants, Adversary Proceeding No. 18-05021
(Bankr. N.D. Ohio).

On March 31, 2018, FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. along with certain
of its affiliates filed voluntary petitions for relief in this
Court under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. On April 1, 2018,
debtors FES and FirstEnergy Generation, LLC filed a complaint
against the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The Complaint
seeks a declaratory judgment against FERC as well as preliminary
and permanent injunctive relief preventing FERC from taking certain
actions that could interfere with the jurisdiction of this Court to
consider two motions to reject executory contracts (the "Rejection
Motions") filed in the underlying bankruptcy case. Also on April 1,
2018, the Plaintiffs filed the instant ex parte motion for
temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against
FERC.

On March 26, 2018, several days before the Debtors filed their
underlying chapter 11 bankruptcy cases in this Court, Ohio Valley
Electric Corporation initiated an action before FERC captioned Ohio
Valley Electric Corporation v. FirstEnergy Solutions Corp., (the
"FERC Proceeding"). OVEC's complaint in the FERC Proceeding asks
FERC to find that FES' then-anticipated breach of the ICPA,
pursuant to which FES was obligated to purchase electrical power
and pay for its contractual share of the costs incurred by OVEC,
"would amount to a termination of [FES'] purchase obligation in
violation of the filed rate doctrine and the ICPA."

Both the Plaintiffs and the Defendants, primary and intervenor
alike, exhausted the better part of their briefing and oral
argument on the issue of whether the Court can and should use
Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code to issue a preliminary
injunction to protect its jurisdiction when proceedings elsewhere
might threaten that jurisdiction and might not be automatically
stayed. That emphasis is understandable because prior court
decisions that considered whether a FERC proceeding divests a
bankruptcy court of jurisdiction to consider the rejection of power
contracts subject to the Federal Power Act have presumed, without
detailed analysis, that the Bankruptcy Code's automatic stay does
not apply to such proceedings.

However, an applicable decision of the Court of Appeals for the
Sixth Circuit compels the Court to take a fresh look at the
applicability of the automatic stay in this context,
notwithstanding the fact that the leading cases from other circuits
have given it short shrift. The question central to this analysis
is whether the "police and regulatory powers" exception to the
automatic stay in 11 U.S.C. section 362(b)(4) applies to the FERC
Proceeding or any proceeding similar to the FERC Proceeding in
which a counterparty to a power contract regulated by FERC seeks to
enforce the power contract notwithstanding the debtor's rejection
of the contract pursuant to Section 365(a). The Court concludes
that it does not. Therefore, FERC is automatically stayed from
taking any action or asserting any jurisdiction that would
interfere with a debtor's right to seek authority to reject a power
contract pursuant to Section 365(a). FERC is not free,
notwithstanding the fact that in other contexts it exercises
regulatory power, to prevent a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession who
has successfully rejected a power contract from avoiding
performance under the contract and reducing its financial exposure
for the breach of contract to an allowed prepetition bankruptcy
claim.

In addition, to the extent that the FERC Proceeding might otherwise
be within the police powers exception to the Bankruptcy Code's
automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. section 362(a), the Court also concludes
that the Plaintiffs are entitled to injunctive relief pursuant to
11 U.S.C. section 105(a) to preserve the Court's jurisdiction over
the Debtors' cases, their estates, and their Rejection Motions. In
reaching this conclusion, the Court follows the reasoning of the
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit that "a bankruptcy court can
clearly grant injunctive relief to prohibit FERC from negating [a
debtor's] rejection [of a filed rate contract] by requiring
continued performance at the pre-rejection filed rate."

The Plaintiffs here have shown a substantial likelihood of success
on the merits of their Complaint in this adversary proceeding.
Enjoining FERC is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the
Debtors' estates and the reorganizational goals of the Bankruptcy
Code, including the power to reject contracts. Neither FERC nor the
private parties to the contracts are substantially harmed in a
legally cognizable manner by the entry of the injunction. Finally,
the public interest will best be served by the injunction the Court
has already entered.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated May 18,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2y80pe6 from Leagle.com.

FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. & FirstEnergy Generation, LLC,
Plaintiffs, represented by Kate M. Bradley -- kbradley@brouse.com
-- Brouse McDowell, Brian Carney -- bcarney@akingump.com -- Akin
Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Lisa S. DelGrosso --
ldelgrosso@brouse.com -- Brouse McDowell, John Cleaveland
Fairweather  -- jfairweather@brouse.com -- Brouse McDowell & Marc
Merklin -- mmerklin@brouse.com -- Brouse McDowell, LPA.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Defendant, represented by
Danielle Pham, U.S. Department of Justice & Marc Sacks, US
Department of Justice.

Ohio Valley Electric Corporation, Intervenor-Defendant, represented
by Richard A. Baumgart, Dettelbach, Sicherman & Baumgart, Michael
Esser -- michael.esser@kirkland.com -- Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Marc
Kieselstein -- marc.kieselstein@kirkland.com -- Kirkland & Ellis &
Mark McKane -- mark.mckane@kirkland.com -- Kirkland & Ellis LLP.

Krayn Wind LLC, Intervenor-Defendant, represented by Todd A.
Atkinson -- tatkinson@ulmer.com -- Ulmer & Berne LLP.

Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors, Intervenor-Plaintiff,
represented by Daniel A. DeMarco, Rocco I. Debitetto, c/o Hahn
Loeser + Parks LLP, Lawrence E. Oscar & Christopher B. Wick, Hahn
Loeser + Parks LLP.

                   About FirstEnergy Solutions

Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. (FES) is a subsidiary
of FirstEnergy Corp (NYSE:FE).  FES --
http://www.firstenergycorp.com/-- provides energy-related products
and services to retail and wholesale customers; and owns and
operates 5,381 MWs of fossil generating capacity through its
FirstEnergy Generation subsidiaries.  FES also owns 4,048 MWs of
nuclear generating capacity through its FirstEnergy Nuclear
Generation subsidiary.  Nuclear generating plants are operated by
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC), which is a separate
subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp.

On March 31, 2018, FirstEnergy Solutions and 6 affiliates,
including FENOC, each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Lead Case No. 18-50757).  The cases are pending before the
Honorable Judge Alan M. Koschik and the Debtors have requested that
their cases be jointly administered under Case No. 18-50757.

Parent company, First Energy Corp. and its other subsidiaries,
including its regulated subsidiaries, are not part of the filing
and will not be subject to the Chapter 11 process.  First Energy
Corp. listed $42.2 billion in total assets against $4.07 billion in
total current liabilities, $21.1 billion in long-term debt and
other long-term obligations and $13.1 billion in non-current
liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Brouse McDowell LPA as co-counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. as
investment banker; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as
restructuring advisor and Charles Moore as chief restructuring
officer; and Prime Clerk as claims and noticing agent.  The Debtors
also tapped Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as special counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors formed in the case
tapped Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP as counsel; Hahn Loeser
& Parks LLP as co-counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial
advisor; and PJT Partners LP as the committee's investment banker.


FORASTERO INC: Hires Reiner & Reiner as Special Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Forastero, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to employ Reiner & Reiner, P.A.,
as special counsel to the Debtor.

Forastero, Inc. requires Reiner & Reiner to:

   -- give advice and represent the Debtor with respect to
      collection of the $500,000 judgment against Segal
      Properties, LLC; and

   -- take any and all necessary action to collect said judgment
      for the benefit of the estate including finalizing the
      appeal filed by Segal Properties, LLC.

Reiner & Reiner will be paid a contingency fee of 40% of whatever
is recovered.

Monica Tirado, a partner at Reiner & Reiner, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Reiner & Reiner can be reached at:

     Monica Tirado, Esq.
     REINER & REINER, P.A.
     9100 South Dadeland Blvd., Suite 901
     Miami, FL 33156
     Tel: (305) 670-8282

                    About Forastero, Inc.

Forastero, Inc., listed its business as a single asset real estate
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

Based in Coral Gables, Florida, Forastero filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-13397) on March 23, 2018.
In the petition signed by Marie C. Vallejo, authorized
representative, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert A Mark.

Richard R. Robles, Esq., and Nicholas G. Rosoletti, Esq., at the
law firm Richard R Robles, PA, serve as the Debtor's counsel.
Reiner & Reiner, P.A., is the special counsel.


FREELINC TECHNOLOGIES: Hires Ashby & Geddes as Co-Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Freelinc Technologies, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Ashby & Geddes, P.A., as co-counsel to the
Debtors.

Freelinc Technologies requires Ashby & Geddes to:

   (a) assist The Dragich Law Firm in advising the Debtors
       with respect to their powers and duties as debtors and
       debtors-in-possession in the continued management and
       operation of its businesses and property;

   (b) perform all necessary services as the Debtors' co-counsel,
       including, without limitation, preparing, or assisting in
       the preparation of all necessary documents on behalf of
       the Debtors;

   (c) appear at hearings before the Bankruptcy Court on behalf
       of the Debtors;

   (d) take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
       Debtors' estates during the pendency of these Chapter 11
       Cases, including prosecution of actions by the Debtors,
       the defense of any action commenced against the Debtors
       and negotiations concerning all litigation in which the
       Debtors are involved;

   (e) assist The Dragich Law Firm in preparing and reviewing, on
       behalf of the Debtors, as debtors-in-possession, all
       necessary motions, applications, answers, orders, reports
       and papers in connection with the administration of these
       Chapter 11 Cases for compliance with the rules and
       practices of the Court;

   (f) assist The Dragich Law Firm in providing legal advice
       regarding any disclosure statement and plan filed in these
       Chapter 11 Cases and with respect to the process for
       approving a disclosure statement and confirming
       confirmation of a plan;

   (g) assist The Dragich Law Firm in advising the Debtors in
       connection with any sale of assets; and

   (h) perform such other legal services that are desirable and
       necessary for the efficient and economic administration of
       these Chapter 11 Cases.

Ashby & Geddes will be paid at these hourly rates:

     William P. Bowden, Member          $375
     Gregory A. Taylor, Member          $350
     Katharina Earle, Associate         $225
     David Cook, Associate              $175
     Chris Warnick, Paralegal           $150

Prior to the Petition Date, Ashby & Geddes received two retainers
totaling $10,934 in connection with planning and preparation of
initial documents, pleadings and its proposed post-petition
representation of the Debtors. The first retainer in the amount of
$7,500 was received on April 16, 2018. The second retainer in the
amount of $3,434, which was earmarked for certain filing fees in
connection with the commencement of these Chapter 11 Cases, was
received on April 26, 2018.

Prior to the filing of the Debtors' bankruptcy petition, Ashby &
Geddes applied the Retainers against its fees and expenses for the
period April 5, 2018 through immediately before the filing of the
Debtors' petitions. As of the Petition Date, none of the Retainers
remains. As of the Petition Date, Ashby & Geddes is owed
approximately $10,152.80 for pre-petition fees and expenses and has
agreed to waive this amount.

Ashby & Geddes will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

William P. Bowden, director of Ashby & Geddes, P.A., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Ashby & Geddes can be reached at:

     William P. Bowden, Esq.
     ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A.
     500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor,
     Wilmington, Delaware 19899
     Tel: (302) 654-1888

                   About Freelinc Technologies

Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, FreeLinc Technologies --
http://www.freelinc.com/-- is a research and development company
focused on the adoption of Near Field Magnetic Induction (NFMI) as
a new wireless standard in the public safety, military, healthcare
and consumer markets.  FreeLinc's NFMI solves the security and
reliability problems for Bluetooth and the reading distance
problems for NFC.  FreeLinc claims to be the world's only provider
of its NFMI-enabled products and solutions, and has 43+ patents to
protect its position.

FreeLinc Technologies, Inc. and FreeLinc Technologies, LLC
concurrently filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 18-11254 and
18-11255, respectively) on May 24, 2018. In the petitions signed by
Dr. Michael S. Abrams, CEO, both debtors estimated $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.

The Dragich Law Firm PLLC, serves as counsel to the Debtors; and
William Pierce Bowden, Esq., Katharina Earle, Esq. and Gregory A
Taylor, Esq. at ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A., serve as co-counsel.


FREELINC TECHNOLOGIES: Seeks to Hire Dragich Law as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Freelinc Technologies, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ The Dragich Law Firm PLLC, as counsel to the
Debtors.

Freelinc Technologies requires Dragich Law to:

   (a) assist the Debtors with respect to their powers and duties
       as debtors and debtors-in-possession in the continued
       management and operation of its businesses and property;

   (b) perform all necessary services including, without
       limitation, preparing, or assisting in the preparation of
       all necessary documents on behalf of the Debtors;

   (c) appear at hearings before the Bankruptcy Court on behalf
       of the Debtors;

   (d) take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
       Debtors' estates during the pendency of these Chapter 11
       Cases, including prosecution of actions by the Debtors,
       the defense of any action commenced against the Debtors
       and negotiations concerning all litigation in which the
       Debtors are involved;

   (e) assist the Debtors in preparing and reviewing, on
       behalf of the Debtors, as debtors-in-possession, all
       necessary motions, applications, answers, orders, reports
       and papers in connection with the administration of these
       Chapter 11 Cases for compliance with the rules and
       practices of the Court;

   (f) assist the Debtors in providing legal advice regarding any
       disclosure statement and plan filed in these Chapter 11
       Cases and with respect to the process for approving a
       disclosure statement and confirming confirmation of a
       plan;

   (g) assist the Debtors in connection with any sale of assets;
       and

   (h) perform such other legal services that are desirable and
       necessary for the efficient and economic administration of
       these Chapter 11 Cases.

Dragich Law will be paid at the hourly rates of $250 to $375.

Dragich Law received an initial retainer in the amount of $20,000
on April 5, 2018.  Dragich Law received an additional $15,000
retainer prior to the Petition Date on May 21, 2018.

Dragich Law applied $35,000 of that retainer, leaving a zero
balance.  The firm has an unpaid balance in excess of $20,000,
which it has waived.

Dragich Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

David G. Dragich, a partner of The Dragich Law Firm, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Dragich Law can be reached at:

     David G. Dragich, Esq.
     Amanda C. Vintevoghel, Esq.
     THE DRAGICH LAW FIRM PLLC
     17000 Kercheval Avenue, Suite 210
     Grosse Pointe, MI 48230
     Tel: (313) 886-4550
     Fax: (313) 221-9612
     E-mail: ddragich@dragichlaw.com
             avintevoghel@dragichlaw.com

                  About Freelinc Technologies

Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, FreeLinc Technologies --
http://www.freelinc.com/-- is a research and development company
focused on the adoption of Near Field Magnetic Induction (NFMI) as
a new wireless standard in the public safety, military, healthcare
and consumer markets. FreeLinc's NFMI solves the security and
reliability problems for Bluetooth and the reading distance
problems for NFC. FreeLinc claims to be the world's only provider
of its NFMI-enabled products and solutions, and has 43+ patents to
protect its position.

FreeLinc Technologies, Inc. and FreeLinc Technologies, LLC,
concurrently filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 18-11254 and
18-11255, respectively) on May 24, 2018. In the petitions signed by
Dr. Michael S. Abrams, CEO, both debtors estimated $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.

The Dragich Law Firm PLLC, serves as counsel to the Debtors; and
William Pierce Bowden, Esq., Katharina Earle, Esq. and Gregory A
Taylor, Esq. at ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A., serve as co-counsel.


FTTE LLC: Seeks July 30 Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extension
--------------------------------------------------------------
FTTE, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District
of Florida to extend the time for filing its Plan of Reorganization
and Disclosure Statement for a period of 45 day or through July 30,
2018.

The Court entered its Order Establishing Deadline for Filing Plan
and Disclosure Statement -- the deadline is June 4, 2018. The
Debtor obtained its first extension pursuant to the Court's Order
extending the exclusivity period through June 15, 2018.

The Debtor represents that it is filing a Second Motion in order to
have the time to participate in mediation with two adversary
Defendants that are also major creditors in the instant case. The
Debtor asserts that the treatment of those claims will
significantly impact the terms of the Debtor's Plan of
Reorganization and Disclosure Statement.

Those Adversary Defendants and their respective cases are: (a) FTTE
Finance, LLC, Case No. 9:18-ap-0218-FMD; and (b) First CZ Real
Estate, LLC, Case 9:18-ap-0219-FM.

                       About FTTE, LLC

FTTE, LLC is a limited liability company based in Punta Gorda,
Florida.

FTTE filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-00841) on Feb. 2, 2018, estimating $50,000 in total assets and
$1 million to $10 million in total liabilities.  The petition was
signed by Terry J. Cooke, manager of Taurus Adventure Mgt LLC, as
manager of the Debtor.  Richard Johnston, Jr., of Johnston Law,
PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


GLOBAL MINISTRIES: S&P Lowers Ratings on 14 Bond Tranches to 'CCC+'
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings has lowered its ratings on 14 multifamily
affordable housing revenue bonds issued on behalf of Global
Ministries Fellowship (GMF), Tenn., a nonprofit corporation that
develops and operates affordable housing. The outlook is negative.


This rating action primarily reflects S&P's assessment of the most
recent audited financial statements available (fiscal 2017) and
Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) scores issued by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). "Many of the
credits in this portfolio show signs of continued decline in either
their financial or physical condition or both, which ratings
deterioration, particularly in the past two years, reflects," said
S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Vikas Jhaveri.

In the case of all 14 properties, the erosion of financial or
physical attributes warrants a downgrade. For example, the net cash
flow in some properties is insufficient to cover debt service
obligations. The deteriorating cash flows has resulted from high
vacancy rates, higher-than-expected maintenance and repair costs,
and increasing insurance expenses, among other project-specific
factors. The physical condition deterioration is demonstrated by
significant decreases in year-to-year REAC scores. S&P downgraded
eight of the 14 properties to 'CCC+', reflecting our view that they
are vulnerable to nonpayment. This is due to debt service coverage
falling below 1.0x for consecutive years and that certain
properties have required capital infusions from the property owner.


The negative outlook reflects the properties' deteriorating
financial or physical condition demonstrated by debt service
coverage decreases, loan-to-value increases, and lower REAC scores.


Should S&P's assessment of the portfolio's management, asset
quality, or financial performance improve, it could raise the
ratings.

A loss of Section 8 HAP funding could cause a negative rating
action or a withdrawal of the ratings.


GOLF CARS: Court Conditionally Approves Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge issued an order conditionally approving the
combined disclosure statement explaining the plan of reorganization
filed by Golf Cars of West Texas, LLC, on June 4, 2018.

For Class 4 Unsecured Claims, the Debtor will pay 25% of each
respective over a 120 month period at 0.0% interest beginning
August 15, 2018. Each monthly payment will be $370.56.   The plan
provides that Jeffrey Todd Stevenson retains his ownership
interest.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-10312-84.pdf

                  About Golf Cars of West Texas

Golf Cars of West Texas, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-10312) on Dec. 4,
2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Robert L. Jones presides over the case.  Tarbox Law P.C. is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


GUARDIAN ENTERPRISES: Delays Plan For Unresolved Adversary Action
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Guardian Enterprises of Alabama, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee for an additional 12
months during which they may exclusively file a disclosure
statement and plan, and further extend the deadline by which they
must have an accepted plan by a similar 12 months.

A hearing will be held on the Motion for Additional Time to File
Plan and Disclosure Statement on July 3, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

The 180-day period for filing a disclosure statement and plan will
expire on July 4, 2018. On May 21, 2018, the largest disputed
unsecured creditor in the case filed an Adversary Action
challenging dischargeability of each Debtor as to certain debts.
Based upon the allegations made in the adversary complaint, it is
unlikely that this matter will be resolved anytime soon.

              About Guardian Enterprises of Alabama

Guardian Enterprises of Alabama, LLC, is a privately-held company
whose principal place of business is located at 82 Plantation
Point, Suite 102 Fairhope, Alabama.  It posted gross revenue of
$233,443 in 2017, $180,404 in 2016 and $54,539 in 2015.

Guardian Enterprises of Alabama sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No. 18-50025) on
Jan. 5, 2018.  Scott M. Carmichael, member, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $67,000 in assets
and $2.85 million in liabilities.  

Judge Marcia Phillips Parsons presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped Quist, Fitzpatrick & Jarrard, PLLC, as counsel;
and Van Elkins and Elkins & Associates, as accountant.


GUY AMERICA: Sale of Brooklyn Property to Fund Latest Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Guy America Development Enterprises Corp. filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York its latest
plan of reorganization dated June 6, 2018.

Class 1 under the latest plan is the Secured Claim of MLF3 Pitkin,
LLC. The Debtor will pay this claim partial payment from the
proceeds of the sale of debtor's real property located at 2540
Pitkin Avenue, Brooklyn and 2542 Pitkin Avenue, Brooklyn; partial
payment from funds currently held by third party; and any
additional balance to be amortized over 10 year period with
interest rate of prime plus one. Principal and interest are to be
paid monthly.

Class 5 general unsecured claimants will receive a pro-rata payment
to each claimant of the amount remaining after payment of
Administration Claims and Classes 1 through 5 Claims.

The Debtor will implement the Plan with funds generated from sale
of premises located at 2540 Pitkin Avenue, Brooklyn, NY and 2542
Pitkin Avenue, Brooklyn, NY; funds contributed by third parties and
operation of properties.

The previous version of the plan provided that funds generated from
the New Value Contribution and by operation of its business will
fund the plan.

A copy of the Latest Plan dated June 6, 2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb1-17-43984-93.pdf

               About Guy America Development

Based in Brooklyn, New York, Guy America Development Enterprises
Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 17-43984) on July 31, 2017, with estimated assets at $1
million to $10 million and estimated liabilities at $1 million to
$10 million. The petition was signed by Vishnu Bandhu, president.

The Debtor is represented by Nnenna Okike Onua, Esq., of McKinley
Onua & Associates, PPLC.


H & S BUSINESS: Hires Joyce W. Lindauer as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
H & S Business LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Texas to employ Joyce W. Lindauer
Attorney, PLLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

H & S Business requires Joyce W. Lindauer to represent the Debtor
and provide legal services in connection with the Chapter 11
Bankruptcy proceedings.

Joyce W. Lindauer is the owner of Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC.
Sarah M. Cox and Jeffery M. Veteto are contract attorneys working
in the capacity as associate attorneys for the firm.

The compensation to be paid to Ms. Lindauer will be $395 per hour.
The hourly rates for contract associate attorneys are as follows:
Ms. Cox will be $225 per hour, and Mr. Veteto will be $195 per
hour.  Paralegals and legal assistants are billed at $65 to $125
per hour depending on their years of experience and level of skill.
This case will be primarily handled by Dian Gwinnup who is billed
at $125 per hour.

Joyce W. Lindauer will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Joyce W. Lindauer received from the Debtor the amount of $5,000 as
retainer, and $1,717 as filing fee.

Ms. Lindauer assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Joyce W. Lindauer can be reached at:

     Joyce W. Lindauer, Esq.
     Sarah M. Cox, Esq.
     Jeffery M. Veteto, Esq.
     JOYCE W. LINDAUER ATTORNEY, PLLC
     12720 Hillcrest Road, Suite 625
     Dallas, TX 75230
     Tel: (972) 503-4033
     Fax: (972) 503-4034

                     About H & S Business

H & S Business LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D. Tex. Case No. 18-41199) on June 4, 2018, estimating under $1
million in assets and liabilities.  Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney,
PLLC, led by its founder Joyce W. Lindauer, is the Debtor's
counsel.


HAMPTON OWNERS: 11th Cir. Affirms Sanctions to Leventhal Entities
-----------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned HAMPTON ISLAND HOLDINGS, LLC, THE
HAMPTON ISLAND CLUB, LLC, BLUE HERON INVESTMENTS, LLC, FULCRUM LOAN
HOLDINGS, LLC, HAMPTON ISLAND CLUB, LLC, HAMPTON ISLAND, LLC,
LIBERTY CAPITAL, LLC, REFLECTIONS HOUSE, LLC, TURTLE LAKE HOLDINGS,
LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, HAMPTON LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff,
v. LEE BURTON, THOMAS BURTON, SPOTTAIL LANDING, LLC, REBECCA
TALLMAN, EDWARD TALLMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees, No. 17-12177
(11th Cir.), the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit affirms
the district court's order upholding the bankruptcy court's
imposition of sanctions, jointly and severally, upon the Leventhal
entities -- entities owned by real estate developer Ron Leventhal
(who is not a party to the appeal), including Hampton Island
Owner's Association, Inc. (also a non-party).

The appeal arises out of a protracted, multi-fora dispute between a
number of property owners who are appellees in this case on Hampton
Island, a residential real estate development on the Georgia coast,
and Ron Leventhal along with the Leventhal entities. In the midst
of state-court litigation among these parties, HIOA filed Chapter
11 bankruptcy. Seeking to identify HIOA's assets and liabilities,
particularly amounts owed to or by the Leventhal entities, the
Property Owners sought discovery under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 from
the Leventhal entities. The bankruptcy court granted the Property
Owners' discovery requests. After finding that the Leventhal
entities failed to comply with its order compelling production of
certain documents, the bankruptcy court imposed sanctions, jointly
and severally, on the Leventhal entities. The Leventhal entities
appealed the sanctions order to the district court, which affirmed.


After careful review of the record, and with the benefit of oral
argument, the 11th Circuit agrees with the district court's
analysis and adopt its reasoning, with the exception of a portion
of Part III.c of the district court's order that addresses the
Leventhal entities' argument that the bankruptcy court failed to
make a finding that each entity violated its discovery obligations
such that it properly could be held jointly and severally liable
for the sanctions award. The district court determined that the
Leventhal entities had failed to argue to the bankruptcy court that
some entities had not violated any discovery obligation, and the
Leventhal entities, therefore, had failed to preserve any such
argument. The Leventhal entities appear to have sufficiently
preserved this argument, however, at least with respect to some of
the entities' failure to produce tax returns. Nevertheless, the
Court agrees with the district court's alternative ruling that the
Leventhal entities' argument fails on the merits.

A copy of the 11th Circuit's Decision dated May 22, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2l54Ug0 from Leagle.com.

Robert G. Brazier -- rbrazier@bakerdonelson.com -- for
Defendant-Appellee.

Gary S. Freed -- gary@freedhoward.com -- for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Steven Hall -- shall@bakerdonelson.com -- for Defendant-Appellee.

Fletcher Beaumont Howard, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

James Hayden Kepner, Jr., for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kristin Schneider Tucker -- ktucker@bakerdonelson.com -- for
Defendant-Appellee.

Naomi Bryant Girardot -- Naomi@sparkslawpractice.com -- for
Plaintiff-Appellant.

Based in Atlanta, Georgia, Hampton Island Owners' Association, Inc.
filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D. Ga.) on
August 3, 2015, with estimated assets at $500,000 to $1 million and
estimated liabilities at $1 million to $10 million. The petition
was signed by Ronald S. Leventhal, chairman of the Board of
Directors.


HEATH OIL: Taps Paul E. Jennings as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Heath Oil Company, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to hire Paul E.
Jennings Law Offices, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

Paul Jennings, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
charges an hourly fee of $385.  Paraprofessionals charge $150 per
hour.  Travel time will be billed at $175 per hour for the
attorney.

The Debtor has agreed to pay the firm a retainer of $10,000, plus
the filing fee of $1,717.

Mr. Jennings disclosed in a court filing that he neither represents
nor holds any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Paul E. Jennings, Esq.
     Paul E. Jennings Law Offices, P.C.
     805 S. Church Street, Ste. 3
     Murfreesboro, TN 37130
     Tel: 615- 895-7200
     Fax: (615) 895-7294
     E-mail: paulejennings@bellsouth.net

                   About Heath Oil Company Inc.

Heath Oil Company, Inc. is a merchant wholesaler of petroleum and
petroleum products based in Winchester, Tennessee.

Heath Oil Company sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No. 18-12323) on May 28,
2018.  In the petition signed by Steven M. Heath, president, the
Debtor estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of
$1 million to $10 million.  Judge Shelley D. Rucker presides over
the case.


HMH MEDIA: Citizens Bank to be Paid $5K Under Liquidation Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
HMH Media, Inc. and its affiliates submit a modified second amended
plan of liquidation dated June 8, 2018.

Class 1 under the amended plan consists of the Secured Claim of
Citizens Bank, N.A. The Bank secured claim will be treated as
follows:

   * The expiration of the Letter of Credit will be extended to the
Letter of Credit Expiration Date;

   * There will be deemed to have been waived or cured any and all
Letter of Credit Events of Default that may have occurred prior to
the Effective Date, including but not limited to any Letter of
Credit Event of Default that may be deemed to have occurred as a
result of the Debtors' insolvency and/or the filing of the Chapter
11 Cases;

   * The Debtors will pay to Citizens Bank, N.A. on the Effective
Date, in consideration of the extension and waiver provided the sum
of $5,000; and

   * The terms of the Letter of Credit Documents and Letter of
Credit Arrangement will remain otherwise unaltered.

On the Effective Date, and in accordance with and pursuant to the
terms of the Plan, all of the Debtors’ and their Estates’
rights, title, and interests in the Reorganized Debtor Assets will
be automatically deemed vested in the Reorganized Debtors,
notwithstanding any prohibition on assignment under non-bankruptcy
law. The Reorganized Debtors will hold the Reorganized Debtor
Assets for the benefit of the Holders of Allowed Claims.

A copy of the Modified Second Amended Plan is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12881-384.pdf

A copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is available at"

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12881-366.pdf

                       About HMH Media

Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, Boston Herald, Inc., Herald
Interactive Inc., Herald Media, Inc. and Herald Media Holdings,
Inc., collectively operate privately owned information and
entertainment businesses consisting of the flagship newspaper, The
Boston Herald, as well as a related website, internet radio
station, and mobile applications.

Herald Media Holdings, Inc., and three affiliates filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12881) on
Dec. 8, 2017.

Herald Media reported total assets of $6.02 million and total
liabilities of $31 million as of the bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, and Brown Rudnick LLP serve
as the Debtors' counsel.  Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, is the
claims and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Dec. 21 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Herald Media Holdings, Inc.

The Debtors sold substantially all of their assets to MNG-BH
Acquisition LLC.  The closing of the sale occurred on March 19,
2018.  Subsequently, Herald Media Holdings, Inc., changed its name
to HMH Media, Inc.


HOBBICO INC: Horizon Hobby Buying Miscellaneous Assets for $557K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hobbico, Inc. and Great Planes Model Manufacturing, Inc., filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a
notice of the sale of their miscellaneous assets to Horizon Hobby,
LLC for $557,000.

On May 10, 2018, the Sellers filed with the Court their
Miscellaneous Asset Procedures Motion asking an order, among other
things, approving the Miscellaneous Asset Procedures for the sale
or abandonment of assets of relatively little or no net value to
the Sellers' estates ("Miscellaneous Assets").  On May 16, 2018,
the Court entered the Miscellaneous Asset Procedures Order, among
other things, approving the Miscellaneous Asset Procedures.

The Sellers ask to sell and abandon Miscellaneous Assets pursuant
to the Miscellaneous Asset Procedures.  They ask to sell
approximately two dozen pallets of spare model airplane parts (e.g.
metal and nylon screws, bars, wires, nuts, bolts, flanges, plates,
etc.) and other miscellaneous packing materials.  The airplane
parts currently are stored in open "Tupperware"-like tubs in their
Champaign facility and formerly were used in model kits and as
replacement parts.  The packing includes clamshells, boxes, header
cards and instructions.  Both the spare parts and packing materials
include branding that the Debtors no longer have a license to sell
(but that the Purchaser does).  

Absent the sale, the product would be sold off as scrap or in small
lots to hobbyists (if not branded and if not otherwise
cost-prohibitive to do so).  The Debtors ask to abandon whatever
packing materials and spare parts that the Purchaser does not
acquire (including additional parts located at third-party
factories in China that would be difficult to recover and have
little or no/negative net value).

There will be no any commissions to be paid to the third parties
used to sell or auction the Miscellaneous Assets.  The Purchaser
will acquire the Miscellaneous Assets in exchange for certain
inventory previously acquired (but not needed) by the Purchaser.
This inventory is comprised of: (1) wooden kits/parts to make
Pinewood Derby cars, for which the Purchaser lacks a license to
sell; (2) branded tools used for small woodworking projects that
the Purchaser does not pursue; and (3) palletized and
shrink-wrapped wood inventory used in craft projects that the
Purchaser does not support.  The Debtors have the ability to
monetize the inventory described above in ways that the Purchaser
does not.

Pursuant to the Miscellaneous Asset Procedures, the Sellers have
filed and served the notice upon all Notice Parties.  The deadline
to file an objection to the sale of the Miscellaneous Assets is May
29, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

                       About Hobbico, Inc.

Hobbico, Inc. -- https://www.hobbico.com/ -- is engaged in the
design, manufacturing, marketing and distribution of thousands of
hobby products including radio-control and general hobby products.
The company's merchandise includes a wide variety of radio-control
models from cars and boats to airplanes and helicopters.

Hobbico began in 1971 with just two people and now employs over 650
individuals in facilities that include its West Coast distribution
center in Reno, Nevada, facilities in Penrose, Colorado and Elk
Grove Village, Illinois and its corporate headquarters in
Champaign, Illinois.

Hobbico, Inc., along with its U.S. affiliates, sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-10055) on Jan. 10,
2018.  In the petition signed by Tom S. O'Donoghue, Jr., chief
restructuring officer, Hobbico estimated assets of $10 million to
$50 million and debt of $100 million to $500 million.

The Hon. Kevin Gross is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP as general
bankruptcy counsel; Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP as local
bankruptcy counsel; Lincoln International LLC as investment banker;
and Keystone Consulting Group, LLC, and CR3 Partners, LLC, as
restructuring advisors.  JND Corporate Restructuring is the notice
and claims agent.

On Jan. 22, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 3
appointed the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.  The
Committee retained Cullen and Dykman LLP, as lead counsel;
Whiteford Taylor & Preston LLC, as Delaware counsel; and Emerald
Capital Advisors, as financial advisors.


HOPE INDUSTRIES: To Pay Unsecureds in Full Over 5 Years
-------------------------------------------------------
Hope Industries, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Kentucky a disclosure statement to accompany
its proposed plan of reorganization dated June 8, 2018.

The Plan contemplates a restructuring of the Debtor's and
Affiliates' financial obligations related to the Debtor's
properties and the Debtor's joint and several obligations in order
to repay indebtedness over time, while mortgage holders and secured
tax liens retain their lien claims in the same respective order of
priority until repaid in full. Debtor states that the Plan will
maximize the value of the ultimate recoveries of all Creditors by
regular payments over time and from ordinary course refinancing and
sales efforts following Debtor’s exit from Chapter 11.

The Plan also contemplates the continued business operations of the
Debtor and the payment of all Allowed Claims to the extent set
forth in the Plan, in full over the five-year term of the Plan.
Funds to pay creditors and have adequate reserves to support
operations will come from several sources: rental revenues from
rented properties; ordinary course sales or refinancing of real
property as may occur in the ordinary course following emergence
from Chapter 11; a "new value" contribution of the sole member of
the Debtor Ms. Star Robbins Kusiak of $50,000 at or before
confirmation, to be held as a reserve to secure plan payments; and
ongoing monthly cash contributions jointly and severally from SRC,
and Mr. and Ms. Kusiak, to fund plan payments during the 5 year
Plan term.

In general, all of the Allowed Claims will be paid in full over the
term of the 5 year Plan. Certain of the maturities on existing
promissory notes are being significantly shortened to the 5 year
Plan term. All bank notes are being placed on identical terms in an
effort to provide fair and equitable and pari passu treatment to
the four bank lenders who entered into the loans and indebtedness
in the joint and several fashion that they each agreed to in making
their respective original loans, acting to secure affiliate debt
with Debtor assets: monthly repayments at prime plus 1% interest
rate; 30 year amortization, and balloon payment in full at the end
of 5 years, on or before Oct. 1, 2023. The Debtor believes that
this provides a reasonable and conservative approach to its
emergence from Chapter 11, while providing some fresh capital to
alleviate ongoing payment risk while the Reorganized Debtor pursues
fair market sales and refinancing outside the context of
foreclosure and chapter 11 bankruptcy. The distressed situation of
the prominent Laurel County foreclosure as well as the chapter 11
have rendered fair market efforts impossible.

Class 10 consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claims against the
Debtor other than unclassified Claims, Cure Claims, Priority Tax
Claims, Priority Non-Tax Claims, Secured Claims, and Equity
Interests. The Plan provides that each holder of an Allowed Claim
in Class 10 shall receive monthly pro rata distributions equal to
their proportionate share of the entire class, beginning in October
2018, and continuing for five years at which time a final balloon
payment will pay the Class 10 Claims in full, without interest. The
amount of unsecured claims is estimated to be approximately
$25,000, not including the Scheduled Claim of Mr. and Ms. Kusiak.
The Insider Claim of the Kusiaks will receive no payment unless and
until all other Claims in the Plan have been paid in full.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/kyeb18-60142-122.pdf

                  About Hope Industries

Based in London, Kentucky, Hope Industries, LLC owns and manages
improved and unimproved real properties in Laurel County, Kentucky.
It also has an interest in improved real property in Whitley
County, Kentucky, and in Fayetteville, North Carolina.   

Hope Industries sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Case No. 18-60142) on Feb. 9,
2018.  In the petition signed by Star Robbins Kusiak, member, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Gregory R. Schaaf presides over the case.  DelCotto
Law Group PLLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.


HOUGHTON MIFFLIN: Bank Debt Trades at 7% Off
--------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt Publishers Incorporated is a borrower traded in the
secondary market at 93.46 cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended
Friday, June 8, 2018, according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson
Reuters MTM Pricing. This represents an increase of 0.67 percentage
points from the previous week. Houghton Mifflin pays 300 basis
points above LIBOR to borrow under the $800 million facility. The
bank loan matures on May 29, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa2'
and Standard & Poor's gave a 'B' rating to the loan. The loan is
one of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, June 8.                                    


IHEARTMEDIA INC: Wants to Maintain Exclusivity Until January 2019
-----------------------------------------------------------------
iHeartMedia, Inc. and its debtor affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas for a 180-day extension of
the exclusivity periods to file and solicit acceptances of a
chapter 11 plan through and including Jan. 8, 2019 and March 9,
2019, respectively.

The Debtors are pursuing a restructuring that is outlined in that
certain Restructuring Support Agreement.  Holders of approximately
82 percent of Term Loan Credit Agreement Claims, holders of
approximately 70 percent of PGN Claims, and holders of
approximately 73 percent of Unsecured Debt Claims, as well as
certain holders of the Debtors' equity interests, are all party to
the Restructuring Support Agreement.

As a result, the transactions contemplated by the Restructuring
Support Agreement enjoy support from Holders of nearly $12 billion
of outstanding debt obligations across the Debtors' capital
structure (including outstanding indebtedness held by the Debtors
and their Affiliates). In furtherance of this restructuring
process, on April 28, 2018, the Debtors filed the Joint Chapter 11
Plan of Reorganization. The broad consensus embodied in the
Restructuring Support Agreement provides a sound foundation for the
Debtors' chapter 11 cases to proceed in an efficient,
cost-effective, and value-maximizing manner.

The Debtors are continuing to proceed through these chapter 11
cases at a steady pace while working to negotiate open items in the
Plan, pursue value-maximizing alternatives, and build greater
consensus for their restructuring. During the first three months of
these chapter 11 cases, the Debtors have, among other things:

     (a) achieved fully-consensual orders on all of the Debtors'
First Day operational motions;

     (b) achieved a fully consensual resolution to the use of cash
collateral and a stipulation that provides adequate protection
relating to the collateral of the Term Loan/PGN Group (among
others);

     (c) obtained approval of and consummated a debtor in
possession financing facility that refinanced the Debtors'
prepetition ABL facility resulting in significant cost savings to
the Debtors' estates;

     (d) formulated a long-term business plan; and

     (e) filed initial versions of the Plan and Disclosure
Statement.  

While the Debtors have made substantial progress toward confirming
their Plan, much work still remains to be done. The Debtors have
subsequently worked to update both the Plan and Disclosure
Statement for various developments and based on ongoing discussions
with their creditors. The Debtors currently anticipate filing a
motion later in June seeking approval of the Disclosure Statement,
establishing dates for the Disclosure Statement and Confirmation
Process, and approving related solicitation procedures.

Additionally, the Debtors have continued to actively engage with
various parties in interest not party to the Restructuring Support
Agreement to attempt to build greater consensus regarding the Plan,
including significant discussions with the official committee of
unsecured creditors appointed in these chapter 11 cases. The
Debtors also continue to engage with their non-Debtor affiliate,
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. ("CCOH"), regarding the
treatment of CCOH's unsecured claim against the Debtors and the
specifics of the separation of CCOH from the Debtors that is
contemplated under the Restructuring Support Agreement and Plan.

Therefore, the Debtors seek an extension of the exclusivity period
in which the Debtors may file and solicit acceptances of a chapter
11 plan of reorganization. Extending the exclusivity periods will
afford the Debtors and their stakeholders time to negotiate and
finalize the items that are currently open in the Plan and the
Disclosure Statement, pursue confirmation of the Plan, and proceed
toward emergence in an efficient, organized fashion.

                  About iHeartMedia, Inc. and
                   iHeartCommunications, Inc.

iHeartMedia, Inc. (PINK:IHRT), the parent company of
iHeartCommunications, Inc., is a global media and entertainment
company.  Based in San Antonio, Texas, iHeartCommunications
specializes in radio, digital, outdoor, mobile, social, live
events, on-demand entertainment and information services for local
communities, and uses its unparalleled national reach to target
both nationally and locally on behalf of its advertising partners.
The Company operates 849 radio stations.  The Company's outdoor
business reaches over 34 countries across five continents.

To implement a balance sheet restructuring, iHeartMedia and 38 of
its subsidiaries, including iHeartCommunications, Inc., filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 18-31274) on March
14, 2018.  The cases are pending before the Honorable Marvin Isgur,
and the Debtors have requested joint administration of the cases.

Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries did not
commence Chapter 11 proceedings.

As of Sept. 30, 2017, iHeartCommunications had $12.25 billion in
total assets, $23.93 billion in total liabilities, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $11.67 billion.

The Debtors hired Kirkland & Ellis LLP as legal counsel; Jackson
Walker L.L.P. as local bankruptcy counsel; Munger, Tolles & Olson
LLP as conflicts counsel; Moelis & Company and Perella Weinberg
Partners L.P as financial advisors; Alvarez & Marsal as
restructuring advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC as notice & claims
agent.

The 2021 Noteholder Group is represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher
LLP and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP as co-counsel; and
GLC Advisors & Co. as financial advisor.  The ad hoc group of Term
Loan Lenders is represented by Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP as
counsel; and Ducera Partners as financial advisor.  The Legacy
Noteholder Group is represented by White & Case LLP as counsel. The
Debtors' equity sponsors are represented by Weil, Gotshal & Manges
LLP as counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee for Region 7 on March 21, 2018,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of iHeartMedia, Inc.
and its affiliates.  The Committee tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP as its legal counsel, FTI Consulting, Inc., as its
financial advisor, and Jefferies LLC as its investment banker.


INDUSTRIAL FABRICATION: Delays Plan Pursuing Exit Financing
-----------------------------------------------------------
Industrial Fabrication & Repair, Inc. requests the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to extend by 180 days
the time during which they may exclusively file their plan and
disclosure statement which date would be December 24, 2018, and to
further extend the deadline by which the Debtor must have an
accepted plan by a similar 180 days.

A hearing will be held on the Motion for Additional Time to File
Plan and Disclosure Statement on July 19, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.

The 120-exclusive period for filing a disclosure statement and plan
will expire on June 27, 2018. One of the critical elements
necessary for a disclosure statement and plan is to obtain DIP
financing. Following their work, the Debtors will then need
additional time to formulate a final disclosure statement and plan.


                  Industrial Fabrication & Repair

Established in 1981, Industrial Fabrication & Repair, Inc. --
http://www.ifr-tn.com/-- services numerous industries and is a
source for all design, engineering, machining, fabrication and
repair needs. The Company's service area includes Knoxville and all
of East Tennessee.

Industrial Fabrication & Repair filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D. Tenn. Case No. 18-30530) on Feb. 27, 2018.  In the petition
signed by Mac Phillips, authorized representative, the Debtor had
$2.17 million in total assets and $4.72 million in total
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Suzanne H. Bauknight.
The Debtor is represented by Ryan E. Jarrard, Esq. at Quist,
Fitzpatrick & Jarrard, PLLC.


IRON BRIDGE: Amended Plan Cuts Creditors' Recovery to 25%
---------------------------------------------------------
Iron Bridge Tools, Inc., filed an amended plan of reorganization
that decreased the estimated recovery of general unsecured
creditors to 25%.  The prior plan filed proposed a 70% recovery to
unsecured creditors.

Under the Amended Plan, Class 7 allowed claims of Unsecured
Creditors totals less than $8,000,000.  The Debtor says the class
will be further reduced by the claims objection process. The Debtor
is still in the process of finalizing its objections to Claims.

Each holder of an Allowed Claim within Class 7 will receive payment
in an amount equal to the greater of: (i) $1,000; or (ii) a pro
rata share of the Discounted Fund made available for distribution
solely to holders of Allowed Class 7 Claims, but in no event to
exceed 25%. The Reorganized Debtor will make distributions to
holders of Class 7 Claims upon the later of: (i) one year following
the Effective Date; or (ii) the allowance of a Class 7 Claim. The
Reorganized Debtor will reserve the greater of: (i) $1,000; or (ii)
pro rata share of the Discounted Fund that any holder of a Disputed
Class 7 Claim would be entitled to receive in the event their
Disputed Class 7 Claim was allowed in full. Any amounts remaining
in the Discounted Fund after reconciliation and adjudication of all
Disputed Claims shall be distributed first pro rata to holders of
Allowed Class 7 Claims until such time as they receive their
allowed pro rata share or 25%.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
Debtor's current and ongoing business operations.

In addition, the Debtor has received post-petition operational
financing and conversion of debt to preferred equity treatment
regarding the secured debt held by Hardy Haenisch.  Pursuant to the
plan, Hardy Haenisch will receive the following equity and debt
terms:

   a. Hardy will receive, on account and in consideration of the
debt presently owed to OTX and Hardy (Hardy Capital), Participating
Preferred Stock (Hardy Equity) in Iron Bridge Tools, which
represents 10% of the outstanding equity of IBT, and which,
pursuant to the terms and conditions herein, entitle Hardy to
distributions and dividends of 50% of all equity distributions
until the principal amount of the Hardy Capital has been repaid.

   b. The Hardy Capital will be the amount of the indebtedness due
and owing to OTX and Hardy as of November 1, 2017 ($2,050,436.23),
which amounts have been purchased by Hardy or are otherwise
satisfied on behalf of IBT by Hardy, and will include such other
items advanced under the agreement.  In addition, the Lender has
advanced post-petition funds to the Debtor in excess of $865,000
which amount will be included in Hardy Capital.

   c. The Hardy Equity will participate in all distributions and
dividends on account of equity with participation equivalent to 50%
of all equity until the time as the Hardy Capital has been repaid,
after which time the Hardy Equity will convert to common stock and
receive distributions pro rata with other equity. The Hardy Equity
will represent 10% of the outstanding equity after payment of all
of the Hardy Capital.

   d. The Hardy Equity will have a 1X liquidation preference above
all other equity in the Company to the extent and in the amount of
the unpaid Hardy Capital and any Additional Capital Advances.

   e. The Company will form an Equity Committee which shall act as
a board with respect to Major Decisions.

Pursuant to the Plan, a cash payment amount of $1,360,000 will be
deposited and distributed for distribution by the Reorganized
Debtor to Class 7 creditors who have elected to receive a pro-rata
discounted distribution pursuant to Section 5.6 of this plan.
Along with other consideration, including but not limited to claim
subordination and relinquishment of partial equity in the Debtor,
and in exchange for the releases, retention of equity and
contribution to the Plan, the Debtor's principal and pre-petition
shareholder Glenn Robinson will be jointly and severally liable for
the payment of $200,000 of the Discounted Fund which obligation may
be satisfied by direct payment, borrowing, or payment otherwise
made for the benefit of or on behalf of Glenn Robinson.

A full-text copy of the Amended Chapter 11 Plan is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb16-17505-328.pdf

                    About Iron Bridge Tools

Iron Bridge Tools, Inc., is a Florida corporation, founded in 2006.
The Debtor manufactures and wholesales hand tools with operations
in Florida, Georgia, California, Canada and China.  Iron Bridge
Tools manufactures for major retailers and designers such as Home
Depot, Skil, OVC, Best Buy, Target, OSH, Advance Auto Parts, ROSS,
Carquest among others.  Its current corporate headquarters is
located at 6820 Lyons Technology Circle, Suite 250, Coconut Creek,
Florida 33073.  

Iron Bridge Tools filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 16-17505) on May 25, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Glenn Robinson, president.  The Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and debts of $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Raymond B. Ray presides over the case.  

Craig A. Pugatch, Esq., at Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen,
PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  

The Debtor employed Frank Smith, Esq., at FMS Lawyer Law Firm as
its special litigation and transactional counsel; Dan M. Delarosa,
Esq., as its special patent counsel; Emil Braca, Esq., as its
special intellectual property infringement and investigation
counsel; and Michael Moecker & Associates, Inc. as financial
advisor.

On June 21, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee tapped
Eyal Berger, Esq., at Akerman LLP as its legal counsel.

On May 5, 2017, the Debtor filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.


IRON BRIDGE: DOJ Watchdog Seeks Conversion or Dismissal of Case
---------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel M. McDermott, U.S. Trustee for Region 21, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to convert
the Chapter 11 case of Iron Bridge Tools, Inc., to one under
Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, or dismiss the Chapter 11 case.
In the alternative, the U.S. Trustee asks the Court to direct the
appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee.

The U.S. Trustee tells the Court that the failure of the Debtor to
timely file monthly operating reports could demonstrate a
substantial or continuing loss to or diminution of the estate and
the absence of a reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation pursuant
to Section 1112(b)(4)(A).  It can also demonstrate gross
mismanagement of the affairs of the Debtor pursuant to Section
1112(b)(4)(B), the U.S. Trustee says.

The failure to timely file MORs demonstrates the unexcused failure
to satisfy timely any filing or reporting requirement established
pursuant to Section 1112(b)(4)(F), the U.S. Trustee contends.  The
failure of the Debtor to remain current on the payment of United
States Trustee Fees constitutes the failure to pay any fees or
charges required under chapter 123 of title 28 pursuant to Section
1112(b)(4)(K), the U.S. Trustee adds.

In this case, the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee would be in
the best interests of creditors and the estate as further evidenced
by the record in this case, the U.S. Trustee further contends.

                    About Iron Bridge Tools

Iron Bridge Tools, Inc., is a Florida corporation, founded in 2006.
The Debtor manufactures and wholesales hand tools with operations
in Florida, Georgia, California, Canada and China.  Iron Bridge
Tools manufactures for major retailers and designers such as Home
Depot, Skil, OVC, Best Buy, Target, OSH, Advance Auto Parts, ROSS,
Carquest among others.  Its current corporate headquarters is
located at 6820 Lyons Technology Circle, Suite 250, Coconut Creek,
Florida 33073.  

Iron Bridge Tools filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 16-17505) on May 25, 2016.  The petition was signed by
Glenn Robinson, president.  The Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and debts of $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Raymond B. Ray presides over the case.  

Craig A. Pugatch, Esq., at Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohen,
PLLC, is the Debtor's counsel.  

The Debtor employed Frank Smith, Esq., at FMS Lawyer Law Firm as
its special litigation and transactional counsel; Dan M. Delarosa,
Esq., as its special patent counsel; Emil Braca, Esq., as its
special intellectual property infringement and investigation
counsel; and Michael Moecker & Associates, Inc. as financial
advisor.

On June 21, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee tapped
Eyal Berger, Esq., at Akerman LLP as its legal counsel.

On May 5, 2017, the Debtor filed a Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.


JOHN HULL TRUCKING: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: John Hull Trucking, LLC
        P.O. Box 1159
        Powell, WY 82435

Business Description: John Hull Trucking, LLC is a cargo and
                      freight company in Powell, Wyoming.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 18, 2018

Case No.: 18-20494

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Wyoming (Cheyenne)

Judge: Hon. Cathleen D. Parker

Debtor's Counsel: Margaret M. White, Esq.
                  KARPAN AND WHITE P.C.
                  1920 Thomes Avenue, Suite 610
                  Cheyenne, WY 82001
                  Tel: (307) 637-0143
                  Fax: (307) 637-0477
                  E-mail: mmw@karpanwhite.com

Total Assets: $234,850

Total Liabilities: $1,438,319

The petition was signed by Merrill John Hull, member.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's two unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/wyb18-20494.pdf


JUDYCAT INC: Unsecured Creditors to Receive Nothing Under Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judycat, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Missouri a combined plan and disclosure statement on
June 11, 2018.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the net
operational income from Debtor.

No payment will be made to general unsecured creditors.
Shareholder, Allen E. Brown will continue to receive compensation
from the operation of the Debtor's business in the amount of
$1,700. Both shareholder, Allen E. Brown and Sean Fannin will
receive all pre- petition property after conclusion of the plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/mowb17-61330-22.pdf

                        About Judycat Inc.

Judycat, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. W.D. Mo. Case No. 17-61330) on Dec. 12, 2017.  Judge
Cynthia A. Norton presides over the case.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of less than $500,000.  Ted L. Tinsman, Esq., at
Douglas, Haun & Heidemann, P.C., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Judycat, Inc., as of Jan. 18,
2018, according to a court docket.


KC7 RANCH: Seeks to Hire Wesley C. Stripling as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
KC7 Ranch, Ltd., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ
the Law Office of Wesley C. Stripling IV, as special counsel to the
Debtor.

On June 7, 2017, prepetition arbitration proceedings were commenced
by Glenn M. Darden, Anne Darden Self, Frank Williamson Darden,
Christopher Glenn Darden, Cara Lecand Darden, and Thomas Houston
Self in various capacities against KC7 Ranch, Ltd., KC7 Partners,
LLC and certain non-Debtor affiliates, including the Debtors'
principal, Toby Darden.

On May 8, 2018, the Court entered that certain Order on Claimants'
Second Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay the "Stay Order"),
pursuant to which the automatic stay was modified to allow the
Claimants to liquidate their disputed claims in the Arbitration.

KC7 Ranch requires Wesley C. Stripling to represent the Debtors in
the Arbitration, and assist the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel with
regard to the prior litigation handled by Wesley C. Stripling.

Wesley C. Stripling will be paid at the hourly rate of $375.

Wesley C. Stripling will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Wesley C. Stripling IV, partner of Law Office of Wesley C.
Stripling IV, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Wesley C. Stripling can be reached at:

     Wesley C. Stripling IV, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF WESLEY C. STRIPLING IV
     6100 Camp Bowie Boulevard, Suite 27
     Fort Worth, TX 76116
     Tel: (817) 737-9794

                        About KC7 Ranch

Based in Fort Worth, Texas, KC7 Ranch, Ltd., is a privately held
company that owns a real property asset known as the "KC7 Ranch".

KC7 Ranch filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D
Tex. Case No. 17-45166) on Dec. 28, 2017.  In the petition signed
by its president Thomas F. Darden, the Debtor estimated assets
between $50 million and $100 million, and liabilities between $10
million and $50 million.  Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal,
L.L.P., serves as counsel to the Debtor.  The Law Office of Wesley
C. Stripling IV, is the special counsel.


KEITH BLACK RACING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Keith Black Racing Engines, Inc.
        11120 Scott Avenue
        South Gate, CA 90280

Business Description: Keith Black Racing Engines, Inc., based in
                      South Gate, California, is a manufacturer of
                      engines supplies equipment and parts.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 18, 2018

Case No.: 18-17000

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Judge: Hon. Ernest M. Robles

Debtor's Counsel: Vanessa M. Haberbush, Esq.
                  HABERBUSH & ASSOCIATES, LLP
                  444 W Ocean Blvd Ste 1400
                  Long Beach, CA 90802
                  Tel: 562-435-3456
                  Fax: 562-435-6335
                  Email: vhaberbush@lbinsolvency.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Kenneth Black, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-17000.pdf


LANDS' END: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
--------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Lands' End is a
borrower traded in the secondary market at 95.50
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents a decrease of 0.43 percentage points from the
previous week. Lands' End pays 325 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow underthe $515 million facility. The bank loan matures on
April 4, 2021. Moody's rates the loan 'B3 and Standard & Poor's
gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday,
June 8.                                    




LIGHTSQUARED INC: Bank Debt Trades at 15% Off
---------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which LightSquared
Incorporated is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 84.67
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 4.53 percentage points from the
previous week. LightSquared Incorporated pays 875 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $1.5 billion facility. The bank
loan matures on June 16, 2020. Moody's gave no rating to the loan
and Standard & Poor's gave no rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, June 8.                                    


MARANATHA EVANGEL: Ups Unsecureds' Recovery to 100% Over 15 Years
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Maranatha Evangel Church filed an amended a plan of reorganization
and accompanying disclosure statement to modify the treatment of
general unsecured claims.

Class 4 General Unsecured Claims are unimpaired under the Amended
Plan, and each holder of a Class 4 claim will receive a
distribution up to 100% of their Allowed Claims, in cash, from the
Debtor's disposable income for 15 years from the Filing Date, made
in quarterly payments per quarter, with plan payments totaling
$109,000.  General unsecured claims can expect to receive about
100% of their claims.  The original Plan provided that general
unsecured creditors will recoup 3.22%.

The Amended Plan will be funded from 15 years of the Debtor's
disposable income. The Debtor will first make the contribution
necessary to make the payments of the amounts required on
confirmation, namely outstanding United States Trustee fees.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb17-45210-28.pdf

              About Maranatha Evangel Church

Maranatha Evangel Church, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-45210) on October 8, 2017, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by Rachel Blumenfeld, Esq., at the Law Office of Rachel
Blumenfeld.


MIDWEST PORTABLE: Direct Capital Objects to Disclosures Approval
----------------------------------------------------------------
Secured Creditor Direct Capital Corporation objects to the approval
of amended disclosure statement and plan of reorganization filed by
Midwest Portable Machine, Inc., stating the following grounds:

"The Objection to Amended Plan is based upon the colorable
ambiguity as to the amount which Direct Capital is to be paid under
the Amended Plan.  The Amended Plan appears to provide for Direct
Capital to be paid $88,716.70, but the Amended Plan needs to be
made unambiguous or specific. The Amended Disclosure Statement is
likewise insufficiently precise in setting forth the amount to be
paid to Direct Capital."

Direct Capital Corporation is represented by:

     Kenneth D. Peters, Esq.  
     Dressler & Peters, LLC
     70 W. Hubbard Street, Suite 200
     Chicago, IL 60654
     Tel: 312-602-7360
     Fax: 312-637-9378
     Email: kpeters@dresslerpeters.com

                  About Midwest Portable Machine

Midwest Portable Machine, Inc., is an Indiana Corporation organized
under the laws of the State of Indiana and conducting business
within the State of Indiana at its plant in Booneville, Indiana.
The Debtor's business relates to repairing heavy equipment and
machinery primarily for the coal industry.

Midwest Portable Machine filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Ind. Case No. 17-70587) on June 13, 2017.  John Andrew
Goodridge, Esq., who has an office in Evansville, Indiana, serves
as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

No committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


MILLER'S DELICATESSEN: Hires David Lefkowitz as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------
Miller's Delicatessen, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California to employ
David Lefkowitz as accountant to the Debtor.

Miller's Delicatessen requires David Lefkowitz to:

   a) review and enter point of purchase system sales
      information, purchase invoices, payroll and other
      accounting service;

   b) reconcile bank accounts, prepare trial balance, journal
      entries and financial statements including income
      statements and balance sheets;

   c) prepare other financial reports as required by the U.S.
      Trustee and for the Court;

   d) prepare monthly sales tax prepayments and sales quarterly
      sales tax returns; and

   e) prepare income tax returns for 2018 and future years.

David Lefkowitz will be paid at the hourly rates of $235-$365.

David Lefkowitz will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

David Lefkowitz, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

David Lefkowitz can be reached at:

         David Lefkowitz
         220 Montgomery St. PH1
         San Francisco, CA 94104
         Tel: (415) 788-8858

                  About Miller's Delicatessen

Miller's Delicatessen, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 18-30391) on April 6, 2018, estimating
under $1 million in assets and liabilities.  The Law Offices of
James T. Cois is the Debtor's counsel.


MOKE PEACE: Seeks to Hire Ira R. Abel as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Moke Peace 11 Corp. seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of New York to employ the Law Office of
Ira R. Abel, as counsel to the Debtor.

Moke Peace requires Ira R. Abel to:

   a. advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
      a debtor-in-possession;

   b. assist the Debtor in the preparation of its schedules of
      assets and liabilities, statements of financial affairs and
      other reports and documentation required pursuant to the
      Bankruptcy Code and the Bankruptcy Rules;

   c. represent the Debtor at all hearings on matters pertaining
      to its affairs as a debtor-in-possession;

   d. prosecute and defend litigated matters that may arise
      during the bankruptcy proceedings;

   e. counsel and represent the Debtor in connection with the
      assumption or rejection of executory contracts and leases,
      administration of claims and numerous other bankruptcy-
      related matters arising from this Chapter 11 case;

   f. counsel the Debtor with respect to various general and
      litigation matters relating to this Chapter 11 case;

   g. assist the Debtor in obtaining approval of a disclosure
      statement, confirmation of a plan of reorganization, and
      all other matters related thereto; and

   h. perform all other legal services that are necessary and
      desirable for the efficient and economic administration of
      the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

Ira R. Abel will be paid at the hourly rates of $250-$450.

Ira R. Abel will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Ira R. Abel, a partner of the Law Office of Ira R. Abel, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Ira R. Abel can be reached at:

     Ira R. Abel, Esq.
     Law Office of Ira R. Abel
     305 Broadway, 14th Floor
     Tel: (212) 799-4672
     E-mail: iraabel@verizon.net

                   About Moke Peace 11 Corp.

In order to stay an imminent foreclosure sale and to restructure
the debt on its property, Moke Peace 11 Corp. filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-42780) on May 14,
2018, estimating under $1 million in assets and liabilities.  The
Law Office of Ira R. Abel is the Debtor's counsel.


MONSTER CONCRETE: July 25 Approval Hearing on Plan Outline
----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Clifton R. Jessup, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama will convene a hearing on July 25,
2018 at 1:30 p.m. to consider the approval Monster Concrete, LLC's
disclosure statement describing its proposed plan dated June 6,
2018.

July 20, 2018, by 12:00 p.m. Noon, CDT is fixed as the deadline to
file any Objections to the Disclosure Statement.

As part of the implementation of their Plans of Reorganization,
Monster Concrete and Monster Concrete and Excavation, Inc., intend
on substantively consolidating upon confirmation of this Plan.

The total amount of unsecured claims exceeds $268,030.17.  Holders
of general unsecured claims without priority which are Allowed
Claims as determined on or before the Effective Date of the Plan
will be paid on a pro rata distribution. Payment to the creditors
in this class will be made from the Debtors' future
net income. The Debtor reasonably believes that creditors in this
class will receive a distribution equal to no less than ten percent
of their Allowed Claim. Allowed Claims in this class will receive
monthly payments starting on the Effective Date of the Plan over a
period of sixty consecutive months.

Steve Williams, who owns 100% of the issued and outstanding stock
in the Debtors, will retain his
equity interest in the Debtors, but he will not, however, receive a
distribution based on his Claim under the Plan until allowed
administrative, priority and unsecured claimants have been paid or
otherwise satisfied.  

A full-text copy of Monster Concrete's Disclosure Statement is
available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-80280-29.pdf

A full-text copy of Monster Concrete and Excavation's Disclosure
Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-80279-82.pdf

                 About Monster Concrete

Based in Huntsville, Alabama, Monster Concrete and Excavation,
Inc., and Monster Concrete, LLC, are involved in the concrete
business and are owned by Steve Williams.

Monster Concrete and Excavation, Inc., and Monster Concrete, LLC,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
N.D. Ala. Case No. 18-80279 and 18-80280) on Feb. 1, 2018.  Judge
Clifton R. Jessup, Jr., presides over the cases.  Heard, Ary &
Dauro, LLC, is the Debtors' legal counsel.

No trustee, examiner or official committee has been appointed in
the Debtors' cases.


MOREHEAD MEMORIAL: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until Aug. 15
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Benjamin A. Khachan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of North Carolina, at the behest of Morehead
Memorial Hospital, has extended the Debtor's 180-day exclusive
period to confirm a chapter 11 plan for twenty days from the date
of Continued Confirmation Hearing, up to and including Aug. 15,
2018.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor filed with a third motion for 30 days extension of the
exclusive period for obtaining acceptances of a plan while awaiting
the Confirmation Hearing.

On March 21, 2018, the Debtor filed the Disclosure Statement and a
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Orderly Liquidation (including all
exhibits thereto and as amended, modified, or supplemented from
time to time). Then, on May 2, 2018, the Debtor filed an Amended
Disclosure Statement for its First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of
Orderly Liquidation.

Consequently, on May 2, 2018, the Court entered an Order, which
approved the Disclosure Statement and set the time, date, and place
of the hearing to consider confirmation of the Amended Plan for
June 13, 2018, at 9:30 a.m.

                    About Morehead Memorial

Founded in 1924, Morehead Memorial Hospital --
http://www.morehead.org/-- is a North Carolina non-profit
corporation that owns and operates a 108-bed general acute care
community hospital on a 22-acre campus located at 117 East Kings
Highway, Eden, North Carolina.  Within the Hospital Real Property,
Morehead Memorial also owns and operates a 121-bed skilled nursing
facility.  It also owns several other parcels of real property
located in Eden that are contiguous to, or in the general vicinity
of, the Hospital Real Property.

Morehead Memorial Hospital filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No. 17-10775) on July 10, 2017,
estimating its assets and liabilities at between $10 million and
$50 million.  CEO Dana M. Weston signed the petition.

Judge Benjamin A. Kahn presides over the case.

Thomas W. Waldrep, Jr., Esq., Jennifer B. Lyday, Esq., and
Francisco T. Morales, Esq., at Waldrep LLP, serve as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor also hired Womble Carlyle as
special counsel; Grant Thornton LLP as financial advisor; Hanlon
Hammond Camp LLC as investment banker and operational and strategic
advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as claims and noticing
agent.

On July 24, 2017, William Miller, the bankruptcy administrator for
the Middle District of North Carolina, appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained law firms
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, and Sills Cummis & Gross,
P.C., as co-counsel.

No request for the appointment of a trustee or examiner has been
made in this Chapter 11 case.


MORGAN'S MAIDS: July 10 Plan Outline Hearing
--------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Marian F. Harrison is set to hold a hearing on
July 10, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. to consider approval of Morgan's Maids,
LLC's disclosure statement to accompany its amended plan dated May
24, 2018.

June 29, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and written
objections to the Disclosure Statement.

Unsecured creditors will be paid $3,000 under the company's
proposed plan to exit Chapter 11 protection.

The restructuring plan proposes to make a monthly payment of $50
over five years to creditors holding Class 4 general unsecured
claims.  Payment will start on the first day of the month following
the effective date of the plan.

The plan will be funded by income generated from the continued
operation of Morgan's Maids' chiropractic business, according to
the company's disclosure statement filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/tnmb17-06252-35.pdf

                     About Morgan's Maids LLC

Morgan's Maids, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-06252) on September
13, 2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.
   
Judge Marian F. Harrison presides over the case.  

The Debtor is represented by Steven L. Lefkovitz, Esq., in
Nashville, Tennessee.


MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Court Stays Trust Suits Pending Mediation
-------------------------------------------------------------
In their motions to further stay discovery and to stay discovery,
Defendants Oaktree Loan Fund and SSS Funding II, LLC seek a stay of
discovery until a final judgment is issued in the adversary
proceeding captioned Motors Liquidation Company Avoidance Action
Trust, v. Oaktree Loan Fund, L.P. Motors Liquidation Company
Avoidance Action Trust, v. SSS Funding II, LLC, C.A. Nos.
12191-VCS, 12248-VCS (Del. Ch.) or, at a minimum, until a
scheduling order has been entered in that action following
mediation. Vice Chancellor Joseph R. Slights, III grants the motion
to further stay discovery and the motion to stay discovery for at
least as long as mediation is ongoing in the Bankruptcy Court
action.

The parties report that they are engaged in ongoing mediation.
Unlike active litigation, the parties themselves control the
conduct and outcome of mediation. A stay of discovery tied to the
progress of mediation of a case pending outside of Delaware,
therefore, is not indefinite. So structured, the stay lasts only as
long as the parties to the mediation believe that the mediation is
productive. In the Court's view, it will further the goals of
"efficiency" and the avoidance of undue burden and expense to stay
discovery in these Delaware actions while mediation of the
adversary proceeding is ongoing. While it is certainly not
unprecedented for this court to stay discovery in a context that
practically stays the entire litigation, the fact the litigation
will not progress during the discovery stay is yet another factor
the Court may consider in the exercise of its discretion, time and
material resources to reaching a global resolution of all disputes,
in Delaware and elsewhere, rather than undertaking the considerable
effort and expense of discovery here in Delaware while substantive
settlement discussions are underway.

Based on the foregoing, Oaktree's motion to further stay discovery
and SSS Funding's motion to stay discovery are granted. Any party
may seek relief from the stay following the conclusion of mediation
relating to the adversary proceeding.

A copy of the Court's Decision dated May 22, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2l4Ek6N from Leagle.com.

                    About Motors Liquidation

General Motors Corporation and three of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on
June 1, 2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin, Esq.,
and Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP,
assist the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Al Koch at AP
Services, LLC, an affiliate of AlixPartners, LLP, serves as the
Chief Executive Officer for Motors Liquidation Company.  GM is also
represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller Schwartz and
Cohn LLP as counsel.  Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLP is providing
legal advice to the GM Board of Directors.  GM's financial advisors
are Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the Blackstone Group LLP.
Garden City Group is the claims and notice agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Holding Asbestos-Related Claims. Lawyers at Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the Creditors
Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel on supplier
contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as financial advisors
to the Creditors Committee. Elihu Inselbuch, Esq., at Caplin &
Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos Committee.  Legal
Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31, 2011.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation Company was dissolved.  On the
Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors Liquidation
Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011, between the
parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee -- GUC Trust
Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust,
assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain claims
against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not concluded
prior to the Dissolution Date.


MURRAY ENERGY: Bank Debt Trades at 5% Off
-----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Murray Energy is a
borrower traded in the secondary market at 94.80
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 2 percentage points from the
previous week. Murray Energy pays 650 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $1.7 billion facility. The bank loan matures on
April 10, 2020. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard & Poor's
gave a 'CC' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday,
June 8.                                 


NATURE'S BOUNTY: Bank Debt Trades at 10% Off
--------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Nature's Bounty is
a borrower traded in the secondary market at 89.64
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 2.27 percentage points from the
previous week. Nature's Bounty pays 350 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $1.5 billion facility. The bank loan matures on
September 30, 2024. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, June 8.                                    


NAVILLUS TILE: Examiner Hires National Creditor as Consultant
-------------------------------------------------------------
Diana G. Adams, the fee examiner of Navillus Tile, Inc., d/b/a
Navillus Contracting, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to employ National
Creditor Recovery Services, LLC, as consultant to the Fee
Examiner.

The Fee Examiner requires National Creditor to input the fee
applications into a database program that then allows for
formatting and arranging time entries so that the Fee Examiner can
review the fee applications through a streamlined process.

National Creditor will be paid at the hourly rate of $200 to $250.

National Creditor will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael L. Newsom, a partner of National Creditor Recovery
Services, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

National Creditor can be reached at:

     Michael L. Newsom
     NATIONAL CREDITOR RECOVERY SERVICES, LLC
     28471 U.S. 19 North, Suite 517
     Clearwater, FL 33761
     Tel: (813) 286-2718

                  About Navillus Tile, Inc. d/b/a
                      Navillus Contracting

Navillus Tile Inc., is one of the largest subcontractors and
general contractors in New York, specializing as a high-end
concrete and masonry subcontractor on large private and public
construction projects in the New York metropolitan area. Navillus
works closely with many of New York's most prominent architects,
builders, owners, government agencies and institutions and is
pre-qualified by numerous commercial and government agencies.
Navillus operates its business from a midtown Manhattan
headquarters which it has leased since 2015.  Donald O'Sullivan,
which founded the business with his brothers, is the sole director,
president and chief executive officer of Navillus.

Navillus Tile filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-13162) on Nov. 8, 2017, estimating $100 million to $500
million in assets and debt.

Judge Sean H. Lane is the case judge.

Cullen and Dykman LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.  Otterbourg
P.C., serves as special litigation and conflicts counsel.  Garden
City Group, LLC, is the claims agent and administrative advisor.

On Nov. 28, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Hahn & Hessen LLP is
the committee's bankruptcy counsel.

By stipulation and order entered May 25, 2018, the Court approved
the appointment of a fee examiner in the Debtors' case.  The U.S.
Trustee appointed Diana G. Adams, Esq., as fee examiner.


NEIMAN MARCUS: Bank Debt Trades at 11% Off
------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Neiman Marcus Group
Inc. is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 89.16
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 0.85 percentage points from the
previous week. Neiman Marcus pays 325 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $2.942 billion facility. The bank loan matures on
October 25, 2020. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa1' and Standard &
Poor's gave a 'CCC' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, June 8.                                    


NMSOOH INC: Seeks to Hire Certilman Balin as Attorneys
------------------------------------------------------
NMSOOH, Inc., d/b/a National Media Services, and its
debtor-affiliates seek authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of New York to employ Certilman Balin Adler &
Hyman, LLP, as attorneys to the Debtors.

NMSOOH, Inc., requires Certilman Balin to:

   -- represent the Debtors in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy
      proceedings;

   -- prepare necessary schedules, pleadings and other documents;

   -- represent the Debtors in connection with any motion
      practice and proceedings;

   -- negotiate with creditors; and

   -- prepare, propose and seek approval of a disclosure
      statement and confirmation of a plan.

Certilman Balin will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Richard J. McCord, Partner        $500
     Jaspreet S. Mayall, Partner       $500
     Robert D. Nosek, Associates       $400

     Paraprofessionals                 $150

Certilman Balin will be paid a retainer in the amount of $35,000.

Certilman Balin will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Richard J. McCord, a partner at Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

Certilman Balin can be reached at:

     Richard J. McCord, Esq.
     CERTILMAN BALIN ADLER & HYMAN, LLP
     90 Merrick Avenue
     East Meadow, NY 11554
     Tel: (516) 296-7000

                     About NMSOOH, Inc., d/b/a
                      National Media Services

NMSOOH, Inc., based in Copiague, NY, and its affiliatess sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-72671) on
April 20, 2018.  The Hon. Louis A. Scarcella (18-72671) and Robert
E. Grossman (18-72675), preside over the cases.  In the petition
signed by Eric S. Drucker, president and CEO, the Debtors estimated
up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  Richard J. McCord, a partner of Certilman Balin Adler
& Hyman, LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


OFFSHORE SPECIALTY: Committee Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas a disclosure
statement in support of its plan of liquidation for Offshore
Specialty Fabricators, LLC.

The Plan contemplates the liquidation of the Debtor by transferring
the Debtor's assets to a liquidating trust. The liquidating trustee
of the liquidating trust will liquidate the assets of OSF, evaluate
and object to disputed claims, defend or settle unresolved personal
injury claims, and ultimately distribute the proceeds of
liquidation to allowed unsecured claims pro rata.

Class C-1 general unsecured claimants will receive a pro rata share
of the Liquidating Trust Beneficial Interests and will be entitled
to receive Distributions from the Liquidating Trust.

On the Effective Date, the Debtor will be deemed to have
irrevocably transferred and assigned the Liquidating Trust Assets
to the Liquidating Trustee, to hold in trust for the benefit of the
holders of the Liquidating Trust Beneficial Interests pursuant to
the terms of this Plan and the Liquidating Trust Agreement. Except
as otherwise provided by this Plan or the Liquidating Trust
Agreement, upon the Effective Date, title to the Liquidating Trust
Assets will pass to the Liquidating Trust free and clear of all
Claims and Interests.

On the Effective Date, the Liquidating Trustee will establish the
Personal Injury Reserve in the total amount of $425,000. The
reserve is calculated based in part on the deductible under the
applicable P&I Policy for each respective proof of claim that was
timely filed. The reserve also includes a general contingency
reserve of $200,000 to account for any allowed late filed claims
and the Liquidating Trustee’s expenses of litigating personal
injury claims.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35623-645.pdf

Attorneys for Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for
Offshore Specialty Fabricators, LLC:

    Susan C. Mathews
    Texas Bar No. 05060650
    smathews@bakerdonelson.com
    Daniel J. Ferretti
    Texas Bar No. 24096066
    dferretti@bakerdonelson.com
    1301 McKinney St., Suite 3700
    Houston, TX 77010
    Telephone: (713) 650-9700
    Facsimile: (713) 650-9701

          -and-

    Jan M. Hayden
    (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
    Louisiana Bar No. 6672
    jhayden@bakerdonelson.com
    Edward H. Arnold, III
    Louisiana Bar No. 18767
    Federal ID No. 17158
    harnold@bakerdonelson.com
    201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 3600
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70170
    Telephone: (504) 566-8645
    Facsimile: (504) 585-6945

              About Offshore Specialty Fabricators

Offshore Specialty Fabricators, LLC -- http://www.osf-llc.com/--
provides decommissioning project management utilizing its heavy
lift derrick barges for the installation and removal of oil and gas
facilities in the Gulf of Mexico.  Its facility is located at 115
Menard Rd. in Houma, Louisiana.

Offshore Specialty has been providing offshore construction
solutions to the international and domestic oil and gas industry
for more than 20 years.

Offshore Specialty sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-35623) on Oct. 1,
2017.  In the petition signed by CEO Tammy Naron, the Debtor
estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million and estimated
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

The Debtor hired Diamond McCarthy LLP as counsel, and Koch &
Schmidt Law Firm, as special counsel.

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the case.

On Oct. 25, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


OLD LUMBERYARD: Seeks to Hire Norris McLaughlin as Attorney
-----------------------------------------------------------
Old Lumberyard Associates, L.P., and its debtor-affiliates, seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New
Jersey to employ Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., as attorney to
the Debtor.

Old Lumberyard requires Norris McLaughlin to:

   -- represent the Debtors in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case,
      including to assist in court appearances, research,
      preparation;

   -- draft pleadings and other legal documents;

   -- assist in hearing preparation and related work,
      negotiations and advise with respect to the Debtors'
      Chapter 11 cases.

Norris McLaughlin will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Attorneys         $250 to $700
         Associates        $180 to $465
         Paralegals        $115 to $215

Norris McLaughlin will be paid a retainer in the amount of
$22,500.

Norris McLaughlin will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Morris S. Bauer, partner of Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

Norris McLaughlin can be reached at:

     Morris S. Bauer, Esq.
     NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, P.A.
     400 Crossing Boulevard, 8th Floor
     Bridgewater, NJ 08807
     Tel: (908) 722-0700

               About Old Lumberyard Associates

Old Lumberyard Associates, L.P., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-14280) on March 2, 2018.  The
Debtor hired Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., as attorney.


OMEROS CORP: Shareholders Elected 2 Class II Directors
------------------------------------------------------
The 2018 annual meeting of Omeros Corporation was held on June 15,
2018, at which the shareholders elected each of Gregory A.
Demopulos, M.D. and Leroy E. Hood, M.D., Ph.D. as a Class III
director to serve until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and
until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until his
earlier death, resignation or removal.  The shareholders also
ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Omeros'
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending Dec. 31, 2018.

                    About Omeros Corporation

Omeros Corporation -- http://www.omeros.com/-- is a
commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company committed to
discovering, developing and commercializing small-molecule and
protein therapeutics for large-market as well as orphan indications
targeting inflammation, complement-mediated diseases and disorders
of the central nervous system.  The Company's drug product OMIDRIA
(phenylephrine and ketorolac intraocular solution) 1% / 0.3% is
marketed for use during cataract surgery or intraocular lens (IOL)
replacement to maintain pupil size by preventing intraoperative
miosis (pupil constriction) and to reduce postoperative ocular
pain.  In the European Union, the European Commission has approved
OMIDRIA for use in cataract surgery and other IOL replacement
procedures to maintain mydriasis (pupil dilation), prevent miosis
(pupil constriction), and to reduce postoperative eye pain.  Omeros
has multiple Phase 3 and Phase 2 clinical-stage development
programs focused on: complement-associated thrombotic
microangiopathies; complement-mediated glomerulonephropathies;
Huntington's disease and cognitive impairment; and addictive and
compulsive disorders.  In addition, Omeros has a diverse group of
preclinical programs and a proprietary G protein-coupled receptor
(GPCR) platform through which it controls 54 new GPCR drug targets
and corresponding compounds, a number of which are in pre-clinical
development.  The company also exclusively possesses a novel
antibody-generating platform.  The Company is headquartered in
Seattle, Washington.

OMEROS incurred a net loss of $53.48 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of $66.74 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Omeros had $89.03
million in total assets, $118.3 million in total liabilities and a
total shareholders' deficit of $29.21 million.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Seattle, Washington, issued a "going concern"
opinion in its report on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, stating that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has stated that substantial
doubt exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.


PATRICK O'LEARY: Has $480K Offer for Southlake Property
-------------------------------------------------------
Patrick M. O'Leary asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of New York to authorize (i) the sale of the real property
located at 115 Jellico Cir, Southlake, Texas to Victor Vera and
Joan Ardery for $480,000; and (ii) the retention of Rocha and
Associates as Real Estate Broker.

The Debtor is the owner of the Property.  By the Motion, he asks
authority to sell it pursuant to the terms of a contract of sale
and to retain Rocha and Associates as Real Estate Broker.

As of Jan. 8, 2018, these are the liens and proof of claims on the
Property:

     a. 1st - JP Morgan Chase: $495,981, Mortgage 1st, at 7.8%
interest rate

     b. 2nd - First Tennessee: $20,087, Mortgage 2nd, at 10.3%
interest rate

     c. 3rd - IRS: $1,657,210, Tax Lien

Given the Debtor is in New York, with Court authorization, the
Debtor engaged a real estate broker in Texas, Rocha and Associates
to get the property marketed and sold.  The Broker (and her staff),
have been actively and aggressively showing the property and
procuring a sale and contract for the Debtor as the Court directed
the Debtor to do in December.

On Feb. 24, 2018, the Debtor/Broker secured an executed contract
for the sale of the Property from the Buyers that JP Morgan Chase
themselves has already approved for a loan to finance the Buyers
for the Property.  On March 2, 2018, due to no response, delays by
JP Morgan Chase and required repairs found (from independent
inspector) the Buyer lowered the offer.  On March 16, 2018, the
Debtor delivered all required documents to JP Morgan Chase via its
online website and also to the local law firm representing JP
Morgan Chase.  After the Buyers' formal inspection, the Property
was to be in need of $150,000 in repairs.

On April 30, 2018, JP Morgan Chase still did not process the
paperwork from the Debtor; and Judge Grossman gave JP Morgan Chase
seven days to finish the process.

On May 16, 2018,  JP Morgan Chase still did not process the
paperwork from the Debtor as directed by the Court.  The Debtor was
informed by the Broker that JP Morgan Chase stated that they were
not going to be finished for yet another 7-10 business days.  As of
May 21, 2018, due to JP Morgan Chase not adhering to Courts
direction, the Debtor is now at risk of losing the Buyers.

By the Motion, the Debtor asks the Court to formally and
immediately: (i) deny any lift-stay motions filed by JP Morgan
Chase or any other creditor; (ii) authorize/order the retention of
the Broker (and paid her commission); (iii) authorize/order the
sale of the Property to the contracted buyer; (iv) authorize/order
the sale to immediately proceed to closing with the title company;
(v) with the sale proceeds of the Property, the Debtor will pay the
following (in order): (1) All costs and ordinary/customary expenses
associated with the sale including a real estate brokerage
commission of the industry standard amount of 6% of real estate
Property sale; and (2) the net proceeds will go toward the above
shown claims (in lien position order priority).

Furthermore, the Debtor asks the Court to order the release of
funds (with interest) being held by JP Morgan Chase for a
water-heater leak/flood in the property from two years ago.
Lastly, he needs this real estate sale to be completed in order to
get a Disclosure statement and initial Plan in to the Court.  The
Debtor's timeline has now been seriously impeded by JP Morgan Chase
not adhering to Court's direction/Orders to finish the real estate
sale process given on April 30, 2018.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/Patrick_OLeary_69_Sales.pdf

The Purchasers:

         Victor Vera and Joan Ardery
         Telephone: (817) 422-4319
         E-mail: vvera1776@yahoo.com
                 jardery@verizon.net

The Broker:

         ROCHA & ASSOCIATES REALTORS, LLC
         347 Park North Lane
         Keller, TX 76248
         Telephone: (817)277-2181
         E-mail: dmariehomes@gmail.com

Patrick Michael O'Leary, an individual working as a consultant
through his company that it not in bankruptcy, filed a voluntary
petition for relief from its creditors under Chapter 13 of the
Bankruptcy Code on April 28, 2017.  The case was later converted to
a Chapter 11 (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case No. 8-17-72595-reg) on Aug. 1,
2017.


PATTY DEWITT: Hadoxes Buying Morgantown Property for $2.4 Million
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Patty DeWitt asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia to authorize the sale of the real estate,
consisting of a rental complex, convenience store and otherwise,
being 1425, 1428, 1443, 1445, 1447, and 1449 Van Voohris Road,
Morgantown, West Virginia, which includes without limitation land,
any buildings, contents, equipment, furniture, fixtures, lease
contracts, any disposal systems and applicable permits and
licenses, to Robert B. Hadox and Bonita Sue Hadox and/or their
assigns for $2.375 million.

The assets of the estate include the Property located in Monongalia
County, West Virginia, two other (Preston County) lots, and a
(Monongalia County) commercial lot, among other matters, all real
estate being situate in the Northern District of West Virginia,
together with tangible or intangible personal property which may be
upon any of the premises rented at this time, with residential
leases, which was to be purchased upon a former Order of the Court,
which contract is now cancelled for lack of approved financing by
prior Notice to the Court.  The Property is set forth to be 0.770
ac West Run, 3.586 ac sur. West Run, 1.36ac. West Run (3 apt.
bldgs.), and 0.617 ac sur.  And fe coal, West Run, Monongalia
County West Virginia.

The Debtor is the sole owner of the Property.  As of the petition
day, the Debtor value, the Debtor's interest in Property and lien
interests and encumbrances in various property as then estimated by
DIP are set forth in the prior contract of sale thereon, upon which
financing has now failed.

The Debtor proposes sale of the Property for the just and full sum
of $2.375 Million as set forth in the Purchase Agreement to the
Buyers, with executory contracts and unexpired leases as to remain
valid and binding and in full force in effect according to
respective terms to the benefit of the Purchasers, and owner
financing in the sum of $440,000 amortized over 20 years at 4.5%
interest with a Balloon Payment in 60 months, otherwise secured by
a 2nd lien and otherwise as the Court may approve.

From the sales proceeds, the Debtor proposes to pay the cost of
sale including any commissions, attorney fees of sale, and real
estate taxes not including transfer taxes.  In addition the Debtor
proposes to pay the primary secured creditor United Bank, with an
undisputed secured interest in the Property in their priority as of
the date of closing.

The Debtor believes that the only creditors other than the real
estate taxes and sales commissions to be paid in the case are the
IRS and State of West Virginia as to the terms of their tax liens
as secured by the real estate and personal property sold.  No
subordinate lien holder will receive distribution.

The sale of the Property is made free and clear of any other
interest in it held by any entity other than State property taxes.
United Bank has consented to the sale for less than entitled.  Any
other matters concerning prior authorizations to the use of cash
collateral or adequate protection are also conceded by the order
and the deeds of trust of banks, according to the land records of
this county, securing the promissory notes from the Debtor,
constitute and are protected first priority liens attached to the
Property not subject to avoidance, disallowance, or subordination
pursuant to the bankruptcy code or non-bankruptcy law and granting
to the banks have additional adequate protection, security interest
in to all of the Debtor's equipment, furniture, fixtures and other
tangible personal property located therein and thereon.

Therefore, the Debtor asks the Court that: (1) the matter be set
forth on notice to all parties and interest and creditors for
hearing on June 14, 2018at 1:30 p.m.; (2) it shares and makes
reference to by notice a date for approval of the sale and negative
notice of a date by which any objection thereto must be made; (3)
it approves the sale of the Property, and her assumption and
assignment of any lease or contract in the purchase agreement
affecting the Property; (4) it declares the Buyers will acquire the
Property free and clear of all liens and that encumbrances attach
solely to the proceed of sale; (5) it approves the payment of sale
proceeds to (i) Actual attorney fees and costs of the sale
including unpaid real estate taxes not transfer taxes, (ii)
satisfaction of the primary liens and tax liens in the order of
their priority against the property; (6) it waives the 14-day stay
order approving the sale under Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure 6004(h).

The Sale is to be the first of several as to remaining properties
in accordance with an amended proposal Plan selling all real estate
except two Big Bear lots in Preston County, exempted by DIP.  The
Debtor projects sale of any and all remaining property within the
next month or so after approval of the Plan.

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Patty_DeWitt_240_Sales.pdf

The Purchasers:

          Robert B. and Bonita Sue Hadox
          55 Woodline Dr.
          Fairmont, WV 26554

Patty JoAnne DeWitt sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. W.Va.
Case No. 17-00120) on Feb. 2, 2017.  The Debtor tapped J. Frederick
Wiley, PLLC, and Johnson Law, PLLC, as counsel.  Howard Hanna
Premier Properties by Barbara Alexander, LLC, by Kay Alexander and
Rob Young were approved by the Court as the Raltor for the Debtor.


PAUL'S AUTO CENTERS: Unsecureds to be Paid $500 Monthly Under Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul's Auto Centers, Ltd., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Texas a small business disclosure
statement in support of its plan of reorganization dated June 8,
2018.

During the chapter 11 case, the debtor reduced its inventory
significantly. Going into the case, the debtor knew that it needs
to reduce its rental vehicle inventory by about 20%. Therefore,
shortly after filing, it applied to the Court and received
permission to sell some of its inventory. The debtor has completed
these sales resulting in a reduction of the inventory by about 20%.
It also resulted in a substantial reduction in the secured debt
owed by the debtor on the inventory.

General unsecured creditors are classified in Class 10 and will be
paid $500 per month beginning on the 15th day of the month
following the Effective Date. Estimated percent of claim paid is
100%.

Payments and distribution under the plan will be funded by the
current and future operations of the debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement dated June 8, 2018 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-34657-11-62.pdf

                  About Paul's Auto Centers

Paul's Auto Centers, Ltd., operator of an automobile leasing and
sales business, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34657) on Dec. 12,
2017.  Paul Hamiter, its authorized representative, signed the
petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
of less than $500,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.
Judge Harlin Dewayne Hale presides over the case.  Lusky &
Associates, P.C, is the Debtor's counsel.


PAYSON PETROLEUM: Trustee Selling Grayson Property for $700K
------------------------------------------------------------
Jason Searcy, the Chapter 11 Trustee for Payson Petroleum, Inc.,
Maricopa Resources, LLC and Payson Operating, LLC, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas to authorize him
to sell Payson and Maricopa's real property located in Grayson
County, Texas to include their interests in the Turner #1, William
#1H, Elaine #1, Jenny #1, Crowe #1, Crowe #2, and Brown #1 oil and
gas wells ("Subject Wells"), as well as all leasehold interests,
royalty and overriding royalty interests, or personal property
associated with the Subject Wells ("Subject Oil & Gas Property");
and Payson's interest in approximately 17 acres of Grayson County,
Texas surface property ("Surface Property"), to J. Michael Wheeler,
JMW Brown #1, LLC, and JMW Recovery, LLC for $500,000, plus
$200,000 for settlement of adversary proceeding.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date of
Notice service.

Matthew C. Griffin formed Payson Petroleum in 2008 to, inter alia,
(i) promote the sale of interests in limited partnerships and (ii)
operate oil and gas wells.  He formed Payson Operating in 2010 to
act as contract operator for Payson Petroleum.  He formed Maricopa
Resources, LLC in 2012 to, inter alia, engage in the acquisition
and sale of Grayson County, Texas oil and gas leases.

On June 7, 2012, J. Michael Wheeler and JMW Brown #1, LLC filed
suit against Griffin and Payson Petroleum in the 192nd Judicial
District Court of Dallas County, Texas in Cause No. DC-12-06306,
styled as J. Michael Wheeler and JMW Brown #1, LLC v. Payson
Petroleum, Inc. and Matthew Carl Griffin.  In the Wheeler Lawsuit,
Wheeler and JMW Brown asserted breach of contract and fraud claims
against Griffin and Payson Petroleum for actual damages exceeding
$3 million, plus exemplary damages and attorneys' fees.

Following a jury trial, the State Court entered final judgment (i)
for Wheeler against Griffin and Payson Petroleum in the amount of
$1,538,127 and (ii) for JMW Brown against Griffin and Payson
Petroleum in the amount of $7,791,161.  Wheeler and JMW Brown were
also awarded attorneys' fees against Griffin and Payson Petroleum
in the amount of $352,971.  Wheeler and JMW Brown abstracted their
final judgment against Griffin and Payson Petroleum in the real
property records of Grayson County, Texas on April 7, 2014.

On Oct. 19, 2015, Wheeler and JMW Brown entered into a settlement
agreement with Griffin, Payson Petroleum, Payson Operating,
Maricopa, and Prescott Capital Group, Inc. ("PCGI") to resolve the
Wheeler Judgment.  Under the Pre-Petition Settlement Agreement,
Griffin, Payson Petroleum, Payson Operating, and PCGI agreed to,
inter alia: (i) pay Wheeler and JMW Brown $504,080 by the date the
Settlement Agreement was executed; (ii) release all proceeds to
Wheeler and JMW Brown from a cash supersedes bond posted by Griffin
and Payson Petroleum in the amount of $595,920 to stay execution of
Wheeler Judgment pending appeal of the same; (iii) execute a
secured promissory note in the amount of $2.2 million payable to
Wheeler and JMW Brown in $50,000 installments beginning on Dec. 15,
2015 and continuing on the 15th day of each month until fully paid
("Secured Promissory Note").

Pursuant to the Pre-Petition Settlement Agreement, Wheeler and JMW
Brown agreed to release their judgment against Payson Petroleum
after their receipt of the Initial Settlement Payment and Bond
Proceeds.  The Pre-Petition Settlement Agreement provided that
Griffin would not be released from Wheeler and JMW Brown's judgment
until, among other things, amounts owed under the Secured
Promissory Note were paid.  Between Oct. 16, 2015 and April 15,
2016, settlement payments totaling $1.35 million were made from
either Payson Petroleum or Maricopa to Wheeler and JMW Brown.

On June 1, 2016, Wheeler formed JMW Recovery, LLC.  On June 6,
2016, Wheeler and JMW Brown assigned to JMW Recovery all of their
right, title and interest in and to the Griffin Judgment, the
Payson Judgment, the Settlement Agreement and all benefits incident
to the Settlement Agreement, including without limitation, the
Secured Promissory Note payable to Wheeler and JMW Brown, all
security agreements and pledge agreements granting security
interests and liens upon property pledged and mortgaged to secure
payment of the amounts due under the Secured Promissory Note and,
if default is made in the payment thereof, to secure payment of the
Griffin Judgment.

On Nov. 28, 2017, the Trustee filed his Original Complaint in
Adversary Proceeding No. 17-04122 against the Wheeler Parties to
(i) avoid and recover settlement payments made pursuant to the
Pre-Petition Settlement Agreement, (ii) avoid the obligations
Debtors incurred under the Pre-Petition Settlement Agreement, (iii)
avoid Wheeler, JMW Brown, and/or JMW Recovery's security interests
in Debtor property, and (iv) disallow or subordinate JMW Recovery's
claims in the Debtors' bankruptcy cases.  The Wheeler Parties
answered in the Adversary Proceeding on Jan. 5, 2018, asserting
multiple affirmative defenses to the claims against them and
disputing any and all liability.

The Trustee and the Wheeler Parties have engaged in settlement
negotiations since at least June 2017, when the Trustee sent the
Wheeler Parties his initial demand letter.  Since the Trustee filed
the Adversary Proceeding, the Trustee and the Wheeler Parties have
engaged in further negotiations which ultimately resulted in the
Wheeler Parties' offer to (i) purchase the Debtors' Grayson County,
Texas property, (ii) make a cash settlement payment to the Trustee,
and (iii) release the Wheeler Parties' claims against the Debtors
and their estates.  Between March 23, 2018 and May 16, 2018, the
Trustee and Wheeler negotiated the terms of their Purchase and
Settlement Agreement.

The salient terms of the PSA are:

     a. Purchased Assets: The Wheeler Parties will the Subject
Wells, as well the Subject Oil & Gas Property.  The Buyer will also
purchase Payson's interest in the Surface Property.

     b. Operating Rights: Payson will transfer its rights to
operate the Subject Oil & Gas Property to the Buyer.

     c. Purchase Price: The Buyer will pay the Trustee $500,000 for
the Subject Oil & Gas Property, Surface Property, and Operating
Rights ("Subject Property") as set forth in the allocation schedule
attached to the Purchase and Settlement Agreement.

     d. Settlement of Adversary Proceeding: In settlement of the
Trustee's claims against the Wheeler Parties, the Wheeler Parties
will (i) pay the Trustee $200,000, (ii) execute releases of the
Payson Petroleum, Payson Operating, and Maricopa Claims, (iii)
execute a mutual release of all claims between Trustee and the
Wheeler Parties, and (iv) execute releases of all Deeds of Trust
and other security interests the Wheeler Parties may have in Debtor
property.

The Trustee asks that the Court authorizes the proposed sale free
and clear of any and all liens, claims, charges, encumbrances or
other interests which may be asserted or otherwise exist, with such
Liens to transfer and attach to the proceeds of the sale.

A copy of the PSA attached to the Motion is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Payson_Petroleum_295_Sales.pdf

The Trustee asks authorization to sell the Subject Property in
accordance with the terms of the PSA free and clear of all liens,
claims, encumbrances with such liens claims and encumbrances
attaching to the sales proceeds of Subject Property, with the
individual components of the Subject Property having the values set
forth in the Allocation Schedule.  Contemporaneously, he asks entry
of an order, pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9019, approving the PSA
and authorizing the Trustee to settle the claims he asserts against
the Wheeler Parties in the Adversary Proceeding in accordance with
the terms of the PSA.

The Court's approval of the Sale Motion and the 9019 Motion will
allow the Trustee to (i) liquidate most of the Debtors' property
interests for reasonable value and (ii) settle the Trustee's claims
in the Adversary Proceeding for $200,000 in cash and the release of
more than $2 million in secured claims encumbering the Subject
Property.

The Maricopa bankruptcy estate receives these benefits from the
PSA:

     a. $376,000 from the sale of its Grayson County, Texas real
property interests;

     b. production proceeds related to hydrocarbons produced and
attributable to Maricopa's Grayson County oil and gas assets
through the effective time of the Purchase and Settlement
Agreement;

     c. avoidance of plugging and abandonment liabilities and other
obligations under Texas law, including those owed to the Railroad
Commission of Texas, with respect to the Subject Property;

     d. $200,000 in exchange for a release of Maricopa's claims
against the Wheeler Parties as set forth in the Adversary
Proceeding; and

     e. a release of the Maricopa Claim and any other claims or
interests that the Wheeler Parties may have against or in
Maricopa's bankruptcy estate.

The Payson Petroleum estate receives these benefits from the PSA:

     a. $124,000 from the sale of its Grayson County, Texas real
property interests;

     b. avoidance of plugging and abandonment liabilities and other
obligations under Texas law, including those owed to the Railroad
Commission of Texas, with respect to the Subject Property; and

     c. a release of the Payson Petroleum Claim and any other
claims or interests that the Wheeler Parties may have against or in
Payson Petroleum's bankruptcy estate.

The Payson Operating estate receives these benefits from the PSA:

     a. a release of the Payson Operating Claim and any other
claims or interests that the Wheeler Parties may have against or in
Payson Operating's bankruptcy estate;

     b. avoidance of plugging and abandonment liabilities and other
obligations under Texas law, including those owed to the Railroad
Commission of Texas, with respect to the Subject Property; and

     c. a release of obligations Payson Operating has with respect
to operation of the Subject Oil & Gas Property.

The Trustee understands that these creditors may claim interests in
the Subject Property:

     a. Trinidad Drilling LP, 15015 Vickery Dr., Houston, TX, Attn.
Steve Abney; and  Thompson & Knight LLP, 333 Clay St., Houston, TX,
Attn. Michael I. Schneider: M&M Lien in the amount of $1,813,006

     b. Select Energy Services, LLC, c/o Kim Lewinski Dore Law
Group PC, 17171 Park Row, Suite 160, Houston, TX 77084; and Select
Energy Services, LLC, Randy Friedsam, Director-Credit &
Collections, 1400 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 400, Houston, TX 77056: M&M
Lien in the amount of $67,828

     c. PCS Ferguson, Inc., Dore Law Group PC, 17171 Park Row,
Suite 160, Houston, TX 77084, and PCS Ferguson, Inc., Linda
Maguire, Corporate Controller, 3771 Eureka Way, Frederick, CO
80516: M&M Lien in the amount of $30,620

     d. Peak Oilfield Services, LLC, c/o Kim Lewinski, Dore Law
Group PC, 17171 Park Row, Suite 160, Houston, TX 77084: M&M Lien in
the amount of $22,735

     e. Integrated Fluid Systems, LLC, Kenneth Stohner, Jr.,
Jackson Walker LLP, 2323 Ross Ave, Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75201: M&M
Lien in the amount of $1,078,593

     f. Ranger Directional Services, LLC, Kenneth Stohner, Jr.,
Jackson Walker LLP, 2323 Ross Ave, Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75201, and
Ranger Directional Services, LLC, Chad T. McDougall, Vice
President, 1021 NW Grand Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK 73118: M&M
Lien in the amount of $8,872

     g. Ranger Consulting Co., LLC, Kenneth Stohner, Jr., Jackson
Walker LLP, 2323 Ross Ave, Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75201, and Ranger
Consulting Co., LLC, Chad T. McDougall, Vice President, 1021 NW
Grand Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK 73118: M&M Lien in the amount of
$87,956

     h. JMW Recovery, LLC, J. Seth Moore, Anderson Tobin, PLLC,
13355 Noel Rd., Ste 1900, Dallas, TX 75240: Judgment Lien, Deeds of
Trust, and Mortgages in the amount of $2,023,540

     i. Crescent Services, L.L.C., 5749 NW 132 Street, Oklahoma
City OK 73142: M&M Lien in the amount of $86,881

     j. Grayson County, Linebarger Goggan Blaire & Sampson LLP,
2777 N. Stemmons Freeway, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX 75207: Ad Valorem
Tax Lien in the amount of $103,148

     k. 5J Oilfield Services, LLC, 4090 N US Highway 79, Palestine,
TX 75801, and Daniel Frank Dean, Attorney at Law, Daniel F. Dean
PC, 603 E. Lacy St., Palestine, TX 75801-2965: M&M Lien in the
amount of $145,000

     l. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc., c/o William R.
Sudela, Crady Jewett & McCulley LLP, 2727 Allen Parkway, Suite
1700, Houston, TX 77019-2125: M&M Lien in the amount of $1,411,784

     m. Norman's Well Service, Inc., P.O. Box 875, Gainesville, TX
76241: M&M Lien in the amount of $21,975

     n. Lide Industries, LLC, c/o George Yu-Fu King, 900 Jackson
Street, Suite 570, Dallas, TX 75202: M&M Lien in the amount of
$130,788

     o. Quail Tools LP, c/o Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, Michael S.
Haynes, 1601 elm St. Ste 3000, Dallas, TX 75201: Judgment Lien in
the amount of $225,864

     p. Schlumberger Technology Corp., c/o William R. Sudela, Crady
Jewett & McCulley LLP, 2727 Allen Parkway, Suite 1700, Houston, TX
77019-2125: M&M Lien in the amount  of $68,875

     q. Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC, Bonds Ellis Eppich Schafer
Jones LLP, 420 Throckmorton St, Suite 1000, Fort Worth, TX 76102,
and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC, c/o Shalene McDonald, Director of
Legal Support, 201 North Rupert Street, Fort Worth, TX 76107: M&M
Lien in the amount of $69,300

     r. Simons Petroleum, LLC, Bonds Ellis Eppich Schafer Jones
LLP, 420 Throckmorton St, Suite 1000, Fort Worth, TX 76102, and
Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC c/o Shalene McDonald, Director of Legal
Support, 201 North Rupert Street, Fort Worth, TX 76107: M&M Lien in
the amount of $69,300

Additionally, Christopher J. Moser, the Trustee for the bankruptcy
estates of Payson Petroleum 3 Well, L.P. and Payson Petroleum 3
Well 2014, L.P. has an interest in the proceeds of the sale of the
Subject Property as set forth in the Court's Agreed Order Granting
Joint Motion to Approve Compromise and Settlement Pursuant to
Bankruptcy Rule 9019.  Mr. Moser's address is Christopher J. Moser,
Trustee, Quilling, Sealander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, P.C. at
2001 Bryan Street, Ste. 1800, Dallas, TX 75201.

The Trustee asks that the Court's order granting the 9019 Motion
and the Sale Motion be effective immediately by providing that the
fourteen (14) day stay is inapplicable so the Trustee may
immediately implement the terms of the Purchase and Settlement
Agreement and transactions provided for therein.

The Wheeler Parties:

          JMW BROWN #1, LLC
          c/o J. Michael Wheeler
          139 Kemper St.
          San Antonio, TX 78207
          Facsimile: (210) 224-2364
          E-mail: Mike@nuggetinternational.com

The Wheeler Parties are represented by:

          J. Seth Moore, Esq.
          CONDIN TOBIN SLADEK THORNTON, PLLC
          8080 Park Lane, Ste. 700
          Dallas, TX 75231
          Facsimile: (214) 691-6311
          E-mail: smoore@ctstlaw.com

                    - and -

          Bruce W. Claycombe, Esq.
          GEARY, PORTER, & DONOVAN, P.C.
          16475 Dallas Parkway, Ste. 400
          Addison, TX 75001-6837
          Facsimile: (972) 931-9208
          E-mail: bclaycombe@gpd.com

                    About Maricopa Resources,
               Payson Operating and Payson Petroleum

Maricopa Resources, LLC, Payson Operating, LLC, and Payson
Petroleum, LLC, each filed a Chapter 7 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex.
Case Nos. 16-41043 to 16-41043) on June 10, 2016.  The Debtors were
represented by Mark A. Weisbart, Esq., at The Law Office of Mark A.
Weisbart -- weisbartm@earthlink.net -- in Dallas.

On July 11, 2016, the Court held a hearing on the Debtors' motions
to appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee.  After appropriate notice and
opportunity for hearing, the Court found that cause exists to
appoint a Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtors upon conversion of the
cases from Chapter 7 to Chapter 11.

Michelle Chow was named Chapter 7 trustee but was terminated
effective July 12, 2016, following conversion of the cases to
Chapter 11.  The Chapter 7 trustee was represented by Mark I. Agee,
Esq.

The cases are assigned to Judge Brenda T. Rhoades.

The Court appointed Jason Searcy as Chapter 11 Trustee.


PAZZO PAZZO: Seeks to Hire Norris McLaughlin as Attorney
--------------------------------------------------------
Pazzo Pazzo, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to employ
Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., as attorney to the Debtor.

Pazzo Pazzo requires Norris McLaughlin to:

   -- represent the Debtors in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case,
      including to assist in court appearances, research,
      preparation;

   -- draft pleadings and other legal documents;

   -- assist in hearing preparation and related work,
      negotiations and advise with respect to the Debtors'
      Chapter 11 cases.

Norris McLaughlin will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Attorneys         $250 to $700
         Associates        $180 to $465
         Paralegals        $115 to $215

Norris McLaughlin will be paid a retainer in the amount of
$22,500.

Norris McLaughlin will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Norris McLaughlin previously represented the Pazzo Pazzo, Inc., in
its prior Chapter 11 proceeding, filed on May 31, 2002.  Pazzo
Pazzo confirmed its plan of reorganization on July 20, 2004.
Norris McLaughlin was owned $1,451 which the firm has agreed to
waive.

Norris McLaughlin previously represented Berley Associates, Ltd.,
in its prior Chapter 11 proceeding, which was filed on Sept. 5,
2012.  Berley Associates confirmed its plan of reorganization on
June 12, 2004.  Norris McLaughlin is owed $3,274 which the firm has
agreed to waive.

Morris S. Bauer, a partner of Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Norris McLaughlin can be reached at:

     Morris S. Bauer, Esq.
     NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN & MARCUS, P.A.
     400 Crossing Boulevard, 8th Floor
     Bridgewater, NJ 08807
     Tel: (908) 722-0700

                     About Pazzo Pazzo, Inc.

Pazzo Pazzo Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 18-13516) on Feb. 23, 2018, estimating under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  Lawrence Berger, Esq., at
Berger & Bornstein, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


PEANUT CO: Hires Patton Knipp, and Mann Conroy as Co-Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
The Peanut Co., LLC, has filed an amended application with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas seeking approval to
hire Patton Knipp Dean LLC, and Mann Conroy, LLC, as co-counsel to
the Debtors.

Peanut Co. requires Patton Knipp, and Mann Conroy to represent the
Debtors and provide legal services in relation to the Chapter 11
bankruptcy proceedings.

Patton Knipp and Mann Conroy will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Attorneys        $250
         Paralegals       $125

Patton Knipp, and Mann Conroy were retained on or about Jan. 22,
2018, to investigate and file Chapter 11 cases for the Debtors.
Patton Knipp, as lead counsel, has received a collective retainer
fee of $28,434.

Patton Knipp presently retains $3,283 in Trust for the Kallevigs
individually. Patton Knipp presently retains $6,737 in Trust for
the corporate Debtors.

Patton Knipp, and Mann Conroy will also be reimbursed for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Larry A. Pittman, II, a partner of Patton Knipp Dean, and Robert S.
Baran, a partner of Mann Conroy, assured the Court that the firm is
a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse
to the Debtors and their estates.

Patton Knipp, and Mann Conroy can be reached at:

     Larry A. Pittman, II, Esq.
     PATTON KNIPP DEAN, LLC
     6651 N. Oak Trafficway, Ste. 17
     Gladstone, MO 64118
     Tel: (816) 994-9370
     Fax: (888) 720-1985
     E-mail: lpittman@pattonknipp.com

          - and -

     Robert S. Baran, Esq.
     MANN CONROY, LLC
     1316 Saint Louis Ave., 2 nd FL
     Kansas City, Missouri 64101
     Tel: (816) 388-9686

                       About The Peanut Co.

The Peanut Co, LLC, is a privately-held company whose principal
assets are located at 7489 W. 161st Overland Park, Kansas.

Peanut Co and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the  Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case Nos. 18-20850 to
18-20852) on April 25, 2018.  In the petition signed by Eric Rue
Kallevig, sole member and owner, Peanut Co estimated assets of less
than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

The Debtors hire Patton Knipp Dean LLC and Mann Conroy, LLC, as
legal counsel.


PENSON WORLDWIDE: Bankr. Court Has Jurisdiction in Suit vs SGH
--------------------------------------------------------------
Plaintiff Penson Technologies, LLC, as the successor in interest to
Debtor SAI Holdings, Inc. and Debtor Penson Financial Services,
Inc., initiated the post-confirmation adversary proceeding
captioned PENSON TECHNOLOGIES LLC, (successor in interest to SAI
HOLDINGS, INC. and PENSON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.), Plaintiff, v.
SCHONFELD GROUP HOLDINGS LLC, Defendant, Adversary No. 16-51522
(LSS) (Bankr. D. Del.) objecting to Defendant Schonfeld Group
Holdings LLC's proof of claim and seeking to recover damages for
breaches of contracts. Defendant poses multiple challenges to
Plaintiff's choice of forum and asks the Court to either to dismiss
the matter, enforce a forum selection clause, abstain or otherwise
transfer the case to a court in New York. Because the Court holds
that the matter is, at its heart, an objection to a proof of claim,
it is properly in this Court and should remain here. Accordingly,
Bankruptcy Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein denies Defendant's
requested relief.

Distinctions between "arising under," "arising in" (both core) and
"related to" (non-core) proceedings are not relevant to a
determination of subject matter jurisdiction when the proceeding
has been filed before plan confirmation. Post-confirmation,
however, bankruptcy jurisdiction over non-core proceedings narrows;
it exists only if there is "a close nexus to the bankruptcy plan or
proceeding." In contrast, in core proceedings the close nexus test
does not apply; bankruptcy jurisdiction remains the same as it was
pre-confirmation.

As this adversary proceeding was filed post-confirmation, the path
of least resistance to bankruptcy jurisdiction is a determination
that a proceeding is core. Here, the analysis is straightforward.
Each count in the Complaint is an enumerated core proceeding.
Counts IV and V (objection to claim and declaration on setoff) fall
under section 157(b)(2)(B), allowance or disallowance of claims
against the estate. Counts I-III fall under section 157(b)(2)(C),
counterclaims by the estate against persons filing claims against
the estate. Each claim thus "arises in" the bankruptcy case or
under title 1124 and the subject matter jurisdiction analysis is
complete. Bankruptcy jurisdiction exists over each and every claim
in the Complaint.

Defendant next asked the Court to dismiss or transfer the adversary
proceeding based on a forum selection clause in the APA. As the
Supreme Court recognized, "He who invokes the aid of the bankruptcy
court by offering a proof of claim and demanding its allowance must
abide the consequences of that procedure." In Katchen v. Landy,
that consequence included resolving a preference action as part and
parcel of the claims allowance process; here, it includes
resolution of objections to claims. Because Plaintiff's
counterclaims are statutorily core and the Court may enter a final
judgment on them consistent with the mandates of the Constitution,
the Court will not enforce the forum selection clause.

Alternatively, Defendant requests that the Court exercise its
discretion and abstain from hearing the case. Discretionary
abstention is available to federal courts hearing bankruptcy cases,
and may be exercised in the interest of justice, or in the interest
of comity with state courts or respect for state law. Discretionary
abstention may be appropriate when jurisdiction in the federal
court is proper and mandatory abstention does not apply.
Abstention, however, is "the exception, not the rule." It "rarely
should be invoked."

Many factors guide courts in evaluating a request for discretionary
abstention. In this district, courts often look to these factors:
(1) the effect or lack thereof on the efficient administration of
the estate; (2) the extent to which state law issues predominate
over bankruptcy issues; (3) the difficulty or unsettled nature of
applicable state law; (4) the presence of a related proceeding
commenced in state court or other non-bankruptcy court; (5) the
jurisdictional basis, if any, other than section 1334; (6) the
degree of relatedness or remoteness of the proceeding to the main
bankruptcy case; (7) the substance rather than the form of an
asserted core proceeding; (8) the feasibility of severing state law
claims from core bankruptcy matters to allow judgments to be
entered in state court with enforcement left to the bankruptcy
court; (9) the burden of the court's docket; (10) the likelihood
that the commencement of the proceeding in bankruptcy court
involves forum shopping by one of the parties; (11) the existence
of a right to a jury trial; and (12) the presence of non-debtor
parties.

Fundamentally, the adversary proceeding involves an objection to a
proof of claim. That it involves resolution of state law issues is
thus unremarkable. The state law issues are not complex, and
judicial economy suggests that the objection to the proof of claim
and Plaintiff's counterclaims--which are inextricably interlinked
with Defendant's proof of claim--be resolved by one court. That
court should be the bankruptcy court as the claim allowance process
is a quintessential bankruptcy court function. None of the factors
that favor abstention convinces the Court that, in this particular
case, the interests of justice merits a different outcome. As a
result, the Court declines to abstain.

A copy of the Court's Opinion dated May 21, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2JziOpC from Leagle.com.

Penson Technologies LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Michael S.
Neiburg -- mneiburg@ycst.com -- Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor,
LLP.

Schonfeld Group Holdings LLC, Defendant, represented by Nicholas J.
Brannick -- nbrannick@coleschotz.com -- Cole Schotz P.C., Mark G.
Hanchet, Mayer Brown LLP, Christopher J. Houpt , Wendy F. Klein --
wklein@colesschotz.com -- Cole Schotz P.C., Sean T. Scott, Mayer
Brown LLP, Warren A. Usatine -- wusatine@coleschotz.com -- Cole
Schotz P.C. & Michael R. Yellin, Esq. -- myellin@coleschotz.com
Cole Schotz P.c.

                    About Penson Worldwide

Plano, Texas-based Penson Worldwide, Inc., and its affiliates filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 13-10061)
on Jan. 11, 2013.

Founded in 1995, Penson Worldwide is provider of a range of
critical securities and futures processing infrastructure products
and services to the global financial services industry.  The
Company's products and services include securities and futures
clearing and execution, financing and cash management technology
and other related offerings, and it provides tools and services to
support trading in multiple markets, asset classes and currencies.

Penson was one of the top two clearing brokers overall in the
United States.  Its foreign-based subsidiaries were some of the
largest independent clearing brokers in Canada and Australia and
the second largest independent clearing broker in the United
Kingdom as of Dec. 31, 2010.

In 2012, the Company sold its futures division to Knight Capital
Group Inc. and its broker-deal subsidiary to Apex Clearing Corp.
But the Company was unable to successfully streamline is business
after the asset sales.

Attorneys at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, and
Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor serve as counsel to the Debtors.
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is the claims and notice agent.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 appointed three members to the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors: (i) Schonfeld Group
Holdings LLC; (ii) SunGard Financial Systems LLC; and (iii) Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee.  The Committee selected
Hahn & Hessen LLP and Cousins Chipman & Brown, LLP to serve as its
co-counsel, and Capstone Advisory Group, LLC, as its financial
advisor.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC serves as its information
agent.

The Company estimated $100 million to $500 million in assets and
liabilities in its Chapter 11 petition.  The last publicly filed
financial statements as of June 30 showed assets of $1.17 billion
and liabilities totaling $1.227 billion.

Penson Worldwide's Fifth Amended Joint Liquidation Plan became
effective and the Company emerged from Chapter 11 protection on
Aug. 15, 2013.  The Court confirmed the Plan on July 31, 2013.


PENTHOUSE GLOBAL: Trustee Selling Intellectual Property for $1.7M
-----------------------------------------------------------------
David K. Gottlieb, Chapter 11 Trustee of Penthouse Global Media,
Inc. and its debtor subsidiaries, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California to authorize the sale of
Penthouse Global Media's intellectual property rights, consisting
of the Penthouse Clubs Marks, the Penthouse Club Domain Names and
the rights to use such Penthouse Clubs Marks and Penthouse Clubs
Domain Names, to its current licensee, Penthouse Clubs Global
Leasing, LLC, for $1.075 million, and other consideration as set
forth in their Master Intellectual Property License Agreement,
subject to overbid.

The Assets will be sold free and clear of all liens, claims,
rights, interests and encumbrances pursuant to the terms of the
Settlement Agreement by and between the Trustee and Dream Media
Corp. approved by the Court pursuant to the Settlement Order dated
May 16, 2018.  The Settlement Order provides, inter alia, for the
release of Dream Media's Interests as to a portion of the Sale
proceeds which will be paid to the Trustee for the benefit of the
Estates, and payment to Dream Media of the remainder of the Sale
Proceeds in partial satisfaction of its secured claims.

In addition to the Purchase Agreement, the Trustee asks authority
to enter into the License Agreement with the Purchaser, as
Licensee.  Subject to the terms and conditions of the License
Agreement, the Estates, as Licensor, grants to Licensee a fully
prepaid, irrevocable, exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable,
license, to use, sublicense, franchise (and sub-franchise),
anywhere in the world for a perpetual term, solely in connection
with the ownership, operation, marketing, and promotion of
Gentlemen's Clubs, and the advertising and promotion through any
media now known or hereafter devised, including the Internet, and
restaurant, bar, and cocktail lounge services directly related
thereto ("Licensed Services").  Under the terms of the License
Agreement, the Licensee has agreed to only use the Additional
Intellectual Property in relation to the Gentlemen's Clubs (all as
defined in the License Agreement).

In order to specify the rights of the Estates (and their
successors) and the Purchaser with respect to future registrations
and use of the trademarks that are the subject of the Sale and
License, the Trustee also asks authorization to enter into the
Consent Agreement which will govern such future use and
registration.  The License Agreement and the Consent Agreement will
be assigned to the Successful Bidder at the Auction scheduled to be
held before the Court in connection with the hearing to approve the
sale of other assets of the Estates on June 4, 2018 at 12:00 noon
(PT) (and, if not completed, to be continued to June 5, 2018 at
9:00 a.m.).

The Trustee's goal is to maximize value from the disposition of the
Debtors' assets.  He believes that the consideration to be paid by
the Purchaser pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement
represents a fair and reasonable offer in light of all the terms of
the proposed Sale and the settlement.  Accordingly, the Sale of the
Assets and the License of intellectual property in accordance with
the terms of the Sale Agreement and the License Agreement, are fair
and reasonable and in the best interests of the Estates and their
creditors and should be authorized by the Court.

Moreover, the Trustee asks a waiver of the 14-day stay of the
effectiveness of the order approving the Motion under Rule 6004(h)
of the Bankruptcy Rules.

A copy of the Sale Agreement attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Penthouse_Global_503_Sales.pdf

The Purchaser:

         John Kirkendoll, Manager
         PENTHOUSE CLUBS GLOBAL LEASING, LLC
         1201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 3915
         New Orleans, LA 70170
         Attn: Tim Spratt, Esq.
         Telephone: (504) 267-5498
         Facsimile: (504)324-6761
         E-mail: tspratt@,kirkmgmt.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

         JONES WALKER LLP
         201 St. Charles Ave., Suite 5100
         New Orleans, LA 70170
         Attn: Asher J. Friend, Esq.
         Telephone: (504) 582-8362
         Facsimile: (504) 589-8362
         E-mail: afriend@j oneswalker.com

                     About Penthouse Global

Headquartered in Chatsworth, California, Penthouse Global Media,
Inc. -- http://www.penthouseglobalmedia.com/-- was launched in
February 2016 as an acquisition by veteran entertainment executive,
Kelly Holland.  The Company continues the 50+ year Penthouse brand
legacy.  The focal point of the business includes four main
branches: broadcast, publishing, licensing and digital.  Various
Penthouse TV channels are available in over 100 countries.
Penthouse Magazine was founded in the U.K. in 1965 by Bob Guccione
and brought to the U.S. in 1969.

Penthouse Global Media, Inc. and its affiliates filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Lead Case No. 18-10098) on Jan. 11,
2018.  In the petitions signed by Kelly Holland, CEO, Penthouse
Media estimated its assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities at
between $10 million and $50 million.  Penthouse Broadcasting
estimated its assets at between $1 million and $10 million and
liabilities at between $500,000 and $1 million.  Penthouse
Licensing estimated its assets and liabilities at between $1
million and $10 million.

Judge Martin R. Barash presides over the case.

Michael H. Weiss, Esq., and Laura J. Meltzer, Esq., at Weiss &
Spees, LLP, serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors
hired Akerman LLP, the Law Offices of Allan B. Gelbard and the Law
Offices of Dermer Behrendt as litigation counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on Jan. 30, 2018.  The Committee retained
Raines Feldman LLP as its legal counsel.

On March 6, 2018, the court approved the appointment of David K.
Gottlieb as Chapter 11 trustee.  The Trustee tapped Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP as bankruptcy counsel and Province, Inc., as
financial advisor.


PEORIA REGIONAL: To Sell Property to ADB to Fund Plan Payments
--------------------------------------------------------------
Peoria Regional Medical Center, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Arizona a Chapter 11 plan and
accompanying first disclosure statement wishing to sell its
property to the highest bidder as part of its Chapter 11
reorganization.

The Debtor owns an approximately 7.12-acre real property located at
26320 N. Lake Pleasant Pkwy., Peoria, in Maricopa County, Arizona.

The highest and best offer was made by ADB Investments, LLC, which
intends to purchase the Property and finance the construction of a
three-story hospital building, some or all of which may be leased
by the Debtor.  The exact terms of ADB's offer are still under
negotiation but the expression of interest provides that the
purchase price will be in an amount sufficient to satisfy the
following:

   (a) the first-position lienholder's secured claim in the
approximate amount of $2,200,000;

   (b) property taxes due and owing on the property in the
approximate amount of $500,000;

   (c) City of Peoria's secured claim in the approximate amount of
$5,000;

   (d) small claims owing and related to the fencing of the
Property; and

   (e) $75,000 for payment towards administrative claims and
unsecured claims.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-11742-62.pdf

              About Peoria Regional Medical Center

Headquartered in Mesa, Arizona, Peoria Regional Medical Center,
LLC, aka Peoria Hospital LLC owns an unfinished medical center
located at 26320 Lake Pleasant Parkway, Peoria, Arizona.  The
medical center was intended to be the city's first full-service
general acute-care hospital.  The Peoria Building Board of Appeals
had ordered the demolition of the structure indicating that the
structure was an unattractive nuisance and a hazardous building.

Peoria Regional Medical Center filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-11742) on Oct. 4, 2017,
estimating its assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities at
between $1 million and $10 million.  The petition was signed by
Timothy A. Johns, manager.

Judge Scott H. Gan presides over the case.

Heather Ann Macre, Esq., at Aiken Schenk Hawkins & Ricciardi P.C.,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


PETSMART INC: Bank Debt Trades at 16% Off
-----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Petsmart
Incorporated is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 83.58
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 7.40 percentage points from the
previous week. Petsmart Incorporated pays 300 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $4.246 billion facility.  The bank loan
matures on March 10, 2022. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard
& Poor's gave a 'CCC+' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the
biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans
with five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended
Friday, June 8.                                    


PIN OAK PROPERTIES: Trustee Taps Jackson Kelly as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Johns, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Pin Oak Properties, LLC,
seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia to employ Jackson Kelly PLLC, as special
counsel to the Trustee.

Pin Oak Properties requires Jackson Kelly to investigate potential
unlawful and improper diversions of funds from the Debtor's
estate.

Jackson Kelly will be paid at these hourly rates:

        Attorneys            $210 to $565
        Paralegals            $55 to $200

Jackson Kelly will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

William F. Dobbs, Jr., a member of Jackson Kelly, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Jackson Kelly can be reached at:

     William F. Dobbs, Jr., Esq.
     JACKSON KELLY PLLC
     P.O. Box 553
     Charleston, WV 25301
     Tel: (304) 340-1000
     E-mail: wdobbs@jacksonkelly.com

                    About Pin Oak Properties

Pin Oak Properties, LLC, operates the Middletown Mall located at
9429 W Mill Street, White Hall, Marion County, West Virginia.

Pin Oak Properties filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. W.Va.
Case No. 17-00608) on June 7, 2017.  Dietrich Steve Fansler, its
managing member and 100% owner, signed the petition.

The Hon. Patrick M. Flatley is the case judge.

The Debtor hired Gianola, Barnum, Bechtel & Jecklin, LC, in
Morgantown, West Virginia, as counsel; and Steven G. Williams,
CPA/ABV, as accountant.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not been appointed
in the Chapter 11 case.

The Court has approved the appointment of Robert L. Johns as the
Chapter 11 Trustee in this case.  The Trustee tapped his firm,
Turner & Johns, PLLC, to represent him in the Chapter 11 case.
Jackson Kelly PLLC, is the special counsel.


POST PRODUCTION: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Post Production, Inc.
        6860 Lexington Ave.
        Los Angeles, CA 90038

Business Description: Post Production, Inc. --
                      www.postproduction.com --
                      is a full service post production company
                      headquartered in Los Angeles, California.
                      Formerly known as SonicPool, Post Production
                      provides industry professionals a
                      comprehensive line of post services
                      including editorial, color, visual effects
                      to digital delivery.  It also offers post
                      production rentals and technology products.
                      The company was founded in 2001 by John W.
                      Frost and Patrick Bird.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 18, 2018

Case No.: 18-17028

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Judge: Hon. Vincent P. Zurzolo

Debtor's Counsel: Michael S Kogan, Esq.
                  KOGAN LAW FIRM APC
                  1849 Sawtelle Blvd., Suite 700
                  Los Angeles, CA 90025
                  Tel: 310-954-1690
                  E-mail: mkogan@koganlawfirm.com

Total Assets: $1.45 million

Total Liabilities: $1 million

The petition was signed by John Frost, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-17028.pdf


PREMIER PCS: Court Approves 2nd Amended Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge H. Christopher Mott of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas approved Premier PCS of TX, LLC's second
amended disclosure statement for its second amended plan of
reorganization also dated June 8, 2018.

July 13, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (MT) is fixed as the last day for
submitting ballots for acceptances or rejections of the Second
Amended Plan, and the last day for filing and serving written
objections to confirmation of the Second Amended Plan.

July 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. (MT), at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, 511
E. San Antonio Ave., 4th floor, El Paso, Texas, is fixed as the
time and place of the hearing on confirmation of the Second Amended
Plan.

Class 1 under the second amended plan consists of the secured claim
of Metro PCS. Metro PCS will continue to receive the regular
contractual payments on its line of credit. Those payments are
variable, depending upon the volume of sales the Debtor has, the
number of phones it orders from Metro PCS. Usually, this line of
credit turns over at monthly or more frequent intervals.

There is a chance that litigation which Premier PCS has pending in
Dallas County, Texas may turn out to be another source of revenue
for Plan payments. The litigation was initiated against Premier by
Donald Kim and a company he formed called Doubletree Cell, Inc., to
buy five of Premier's stores (Metro PCS dealerships) in
Southeastern New Mexico. The purchase contract called for Premier
to allow Kim and Doubletree to operate the five locations as a
sub-dealer using Premier's franchise rights with Metro PCS, for a
trial period during which Kim and Doubletree had to prove they
could operate in accordance with Metro PCS performance standards,
and become a full-fledged, independent dealer. During this trial
period Kim and Doubletree agreed to pay all of the operating
expenses of each store, including payroll, rent, utilities, and
other expenses. Kim and Doubletree did not perform up to Metro
PCS's standards, and as their effort flagged, they defaulted on
covering the operating expenses of the five stores.

The counterclaim and third-party claim of Premier against Kim and
Doubletree in the Dallas suit is for $1,000,000. That is the amount
Premier had to cover with revenues from its other stores, to cover
payrolls, rents, utilities, and obligations to Metro, which Kim and
Doubletree failed to cover--though they received the five stores'
income during the trial period.

A full-text copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb17-32021-243.pdf

                  About Premier PCS of TX

Based in El Paso, Texas, Premier PCS of TX, LLC, provides computer
maintenance and repair services.  Premier PCS of TX, based in El
Paso, TX, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
17-32021) on Dec. 6, 2017.  In the petition signed by Richard Ahn,
managing member, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The Hon.
Christopher H. Mott presides over the case.  E.P. Bud Kirk, a
partner at the law firm of E.P. Bud Kirk, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.


PRESSURE BIOSCIENCES: Converts Additional $7.24M Debt Into Equity
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pressure BioSciences, Inc., has converted an additional $7.24
million of debt into equity, bringing the total amount of debt that
has converted into equity over the past four weeks to over $13.6
million.

Mr. Joseph L. Damasio, VP of Finance and CFO of PBI, said, "With
today's announced conversion of an additional $7.24M of debt to
equity, total loan debt has been reduced from approximately $16.6M
to approximately $3.0M, which is a level we believe the Company can
manage.  We are continuing to discuss the Company's progress with
remaining debt holders, and anticipate that several more may follow
the lead of the approximate 40+ investors who converted their debt
into equity over the past 30 days.  We believe such further
conversions could reduce the amount of loan debt on our Balance
Sheet by an additional 10-15%."

Mr. Richard T. Schumacher, president and CEO of PBI, expanded,
"Over the past few years, we have successfully accessed debt for
working capital, which has allowed us to increase revenue, enlarge
our customer base, enhance our instrument and consumables line,
expand our sales and marketing reach, add much needed manufacturing
and development space, and strengthen other internal operational
areas.  At a strategic level, debt capital has allowed us to attain
initial progress and IP issuances in our new Ultra Shear Technology
("UST") platform, and to acquire all of BaroFold Corporation's
assets.  We believe that both of these strategic programs will
bring about substantial expansion in major new business segments,
as previously announced, and will result in accelerating
recognition for PBI with concomitant growth in shareholder value."

Mr. Jeffrey N. Peterson, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
concluded, "On behalf of all stakeholders in PBI, I would like to
thank the many investors who converted their debt into equity over
the past four weeks.  Their strong and continuing financial support
has helped the Company grow into an internationally recognized
leader in the area of high pressure-based technologies, platforms,
and services.  This portfolio is helping scientists in their quest
to enhance and improve healthcare worldwide through the discovery,
development, and quality improvement of new drugs, vaccines, and
diagnostics."

Mr. Peterson continued, "We believe PBI's recent accomplishments,
when combined with the conversion of a majority of our loan debt
into equity, will materially facilitate progress towards our stated
objective of up-listing to a national exchange (NASDAQ, NYSE/Amex)
later in 2018.  We believe a national exchange trading platform
will provide improved access to capital and trading volumes, and
that these should result in a more attractive and higher-value
recognition level for the Company, benefitting all shareholders."

                    About Pressure Biosciences

South Easton, Massachusetts-based Pressure BioSciences --
http://www.pressurebiosciences.com/-- is engaged in the
development and sale of innovative, broadly enabling,
pressure-based solutions for the worldwide life sciences industry.
The Company's products are based on the unique properties of both
constant (i.e., static) and alternating (i.e., pressure cycling
technology) hydrostatic pressure.  PCT is a patented enabling
technology platform that uses alternating cycles of hydrostatic
pressure between ambient and ultra-high levels to safely and
reproducibly control bio-molecular interactions.

Pressure Biosciences incurred a net loss of $10.71 million in 2017
compared to a net loss of $2.70 million in 2016.  As of March 31,
2018, Pressure Biosciences had $2.25 million in total assets,
$18.74 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $16.48 million.

In their report dated April 2, 2018 with respect to the Company's
consolidated financial statements for the years ended Dec. 31,
2017, MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm since 2015, expressed
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.  The auditors stated that the Company has a working
capital deficit, has incurred recurring net losses and negative
cash flows from operations.  These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


PRIME HOTEL: To Sell Property to Fund Plan Payments
---------------------------------------------------
Prime Hotel Management LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York a Chapter 11 plan and
accompanying disclosure statement contemplating a sale of the
Debtor's property to the successful bidder at an auction.

The Debtor is the fee owner of a real property located at 17 West
24th Street, in New York.  The Property is presently encumbered by
liens and encumbrances securing amounts estimated to total
approximately $10,450,000.  The Property had been the subject of a
prepetition foreclosure action commenced by the first mortgage
holder.  Based on a broker's opinion of value prepared in 2017, the
Property has an estimated value of between $8,700,000 and
$11,000,000.  The Debtor's non-lien real property tax obligations
in connection with the Property, both pre- and post-petition, are
believed to total approximately $65,600.  The Debtor's general
unsecured debts are believed to total approximately $3,200,000.

In the event that an acceptable "stalking horse" offer is not
received or an acceptable cash offer is not made at the auction,
the first mortgage holder, DS 17 West 24th Street Note Purchaser
LLC, has agreed to "credit bid" the amount of its secured claim.

The first mortgage holder has filed a competing plan the Debtor, a
full-text copy of which is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-10221-37.pdf

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Disclosure Statement is available
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-10221-27.pdf

                About Prime Hotel Management

New York-based Prime Hotel Management LLC owns in fee simple a
vacant five-storey building located at 17 West 24th Street, New
York, New York, valued by the company at $8.7 million.

Prime Hotel Management sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-10221) on Jan. 30,
2018.  Hag Gyun Lee, president of Eben Ascel Corp., manager of the
Debtor, signed the petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
disclosed $8.7 million in assets and $14.62 million in
liabilities.

Judge Sean H. Lane presides over the case.

Pick & Zabicki, LLP, is the Debtor's legal counsel.


R.O. MANSE: Unsecured Creditors to Get 100% Over 12 Months
----------------------------------------------------------
R.O. Manse 1708, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 plan and accompanying
disclosure statement proposing three alternative treatments:

   First, if the Texas Property is sold before the Effective Date,
(i) secured tax claims will be paid at closing, (ii) the net
proceeds will be distributed to Goldman Sachs, and (iii) general
unsecured creditors will be paid in full over 12 monthly
installment payments from a non-debtor entity that is owned by
William Kallop, the Debtor's sole member and manager.

   Second, in the event that the Debtor has not sold the Texas
Property by the Effective Date of the Plan, the Debtor will convey
title to the Texas Property to Goldman Sachs, subject to all liens
(including secured tax liens), in exchange for a credit of $10.5
million against the amounts due under the Goldman Loans, and
general unsecured claims will be paid in full over 12 monthly
installment payments from a non-debtor entity that is owned by
Kallop.

   Third, if the Debtor obtains refinancing from another lender
before the Effective Date, all claims held by creditors in all
classes will be paid in full.

A holder of an Allowed Class 4 General Unsecured Claim agrees to a
different treatment, each Allowed Class 4 Claim shall be paid in
full, without interest, in 12 equal monthly installments beginning
on the first day of the month following the Effective Date. The
source of funds to pay Class 4 claims shall be
non-debtor/non-estate funds paid directly by William Kallop to
holders of Allowed Class 4 Claims.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-31736-16.pdf

                     About R.O. Manse 1708

R.O. Manse 1708, LLC, is a privately-held company in Houston,
Texas, engaged in activities related to real estate.

R.O. Manse 1708 sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 18-31736) on April 3,
2018.  In the petition signed by William M. Kallop, member, the
Debtor estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.  

Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the case.

Porter Hedges LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.


RAMLA USA: Summer Rolls Buying Central Kitchen for $189K
--------------------------------------------------------
Ramla USA, Inc. asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California to authorize the bidding procedures in
connection with the sale of the business located at 2300 Central
Ave. Units A&B, Irwindale, California, which is a fully equipped
functional food factory with enhanced security and a private office
and includes the leasehold interest for the premises ("Central
Kitchen"), including the assumption of the unexpired
non-residential real property lease between the Debtor and ET Legg
& Associates entered into on Sept. 18, 2012 for the premises and
the assignment of the Central Kitchen Lease, to Summer Rolls, LLC
for $188,888, subject to overbid.

The Debtor's Plan provides for the Sale with the sale proceeds to
be placed in the GUC Distribution Fund.  It asks approval of the
Sale to the Buyer or a successful overbidder free and clear of all
liens, claims, interests and encumbrances, with such liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances to attach to the Sale proceeds.  It
additionally asks approval of overbid procedures.

Prior to the Effective Date, the Debtor owned and operated
traditional Japanese/Izakaya-style restaurants.  By Court Order
Confirming Debtor's First Amended Plan of Reorganization entered on
March 29, 2018, the Plan was confirmed.  The Plan provides for the
sale of the Central Kitchen as proposed.

On March 8, 2018, the Court authorized the employment of Restaurant
Realty Co. as its business broker to market and to sell the
Debtor's operating restaurant in Palm Springs, Gyoro Gyoro Izakaya
Japonaise, located at 105 South Palm Canyon Drive ("Palm Springs
Restaurant") and the Central Kitchen.  

Thereafter, Restaurant Realty commenced aggressively marketing both
the Central Kitchen and the Palm Springs Restaurant.  On May 14,
2018, Restaurant Realty presented the Debtor with an offer to
purchase the Central Kitchen for $188,888 cash.  The Debtor
accepted the offer.  In accordance with the Plan, the Debtor and
the Reorganized Debtor now ask Court approval of the Sale.

The Debtor and the Buyer have negotiated a sale of the Central
Kitchen as set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement.

The salient terms of the proposed sale are:

     a. Sale Price: The Debtor proposes to sell the Central
Kitchen, subject to Court approval, for $188,888.  The Purchase
Price will be deposited in full into escrow by the Buyer within 3
business days before the closing date of the sale.  A deposit of
$18,888 will be placed into escrow upon the signing of the escrow
instructions.  It is anticipated that the closing date will be June
30, 2018.

     b. Sale Subject to Overbid: The proposed Sale to the Buyer is
subject to overbid, according to the terms proposed in the Motion.

     c. No Representations or Warranties: The Debtor is selling the
Central Kitchen to the Buyer on an "AS-IS, WHERE-IS" basis, without
any representations or warranties by the Debtor or Reorganized.

     d. Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: The Court will have
exclusive jurisdiction to interpret and enforce over any case or
controversy arising from the Sale.

While the Debtor is prepared to consummate the Sale to the Buyer
pursuant to the terms of the APA, it is obliged to seek the maximum
price for the Central Kitchen.  Accordingly, it asks that the Court
authorizes it to implement an overbid procedure regarding the
Sale.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Earnest Money Deposit: $18,888 and proof of available
liquid funds in the amount of $180,000

     b. Initial Overbid: The initial overbid for the Liquor License
will be $10,000, with subsequent overbids being made in minimum
increments of $5,000.

     c. Successful Overbidder Subject to Terms of Escrow
Instructions: In the event that the Buyer is not the successful
bidder for the Central Kitchen, the Successful Bidder will then
become the buyer under the same terms and conditions as set forth
in the Escrow Instructions (with the exception of the price to be
paid for the Central Kitchen).  Under these circumstances, the
Escrow Instructions with the Buyer will no longer be effective and
the Buyer will be entitled to full refund of the $18,888.

     d. Present at Hearing: The Buyer and each Qualified Bidder
must be either physically present at the hearing on the Motion or
represented by an individual or individuals who is/are physically
present at the hearing and have the authority to participate in the
overbid process.

A copy of the APA and the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/Ramla_USA_186_Sales.pdf

The Debtor is not aware of any liens, interests, claims or
encumbrances asserted against the Central Kitchen or any of the
assets located at the Central Kitchen.  Thus, it submits the Court
may authorize the Sale free and clear of all liens, interests,
claims, and
encumbrances.

The Plan provides for the Debtor to assume the Central Kitchen
Lease and assign the Central Kitchen Lease to the Buyer after
Confirmation.  The Sale which includes the assumption and
assignment of the Central Kitchen Lease is contemplated by the Plan
and was already determined to satisfy the business judgment test.
The Sale will provide $188,888 to the Debtor which will be placed
in the GUC Distribution Fund for the benefit of Class 3 and Class 4
Allowed Claimants under the Plan.  ET Legg was provided notice of
the assumption and assignment when it was served with the Plan and
the Disclosure Statement as well as the Motion.  Accordingly, the
Debtor submits that assumption and assignment of the Central
Kitchen Lease is in the best interests of the Estate.

The Debtor submits that the Sale is in the best interest of the
Estate and should be approved.

Finally, the Debtor asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay imposed
by F.R.B.P. 6004(h).

A hearing on the Motion is set for June 12, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

                       About Ramla USA

Headquartered in Monrovia, California, Ramla USA Inc. is a small
organization in the restaurants industry located in Monrovia,
California.  It owns and operates traditional
Japanese/Izakaya-style restaurants.  Along with four restaurant
and
food service locations currently in operation (located in Monrovia,
San Francisco, Palm Springs, and Los Angeles, California), it has
two non-operating locations in West Covina, California and Encino,
California that closed in early 2017 and mid-2016, respectively.
Each of the defunct locations still has liquor licenses associated
with them.

Ramla USA sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No.
17-24318) Nov. 20, 2017.  In the petition signed by CEO Yuji Ueno,
the Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and $10
million to $50 million in debt.  The Debtor tapped Robyn B. Sokol,
Esq., at Brutzkus Gubner Rozansky Seror Weber LLP, as counsel.


RANDOLPH AND RANDOLPH: Hires Lehr Middlebrooks as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Randolph and Randolph, LLC, has filed an amended application with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama
seeking approval to hire Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson,
P.C., as special counsel to the Debtor.

Randolph and Randolph requires Lehr Middlebrooks to represent the
Debtor in the Employment Case in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Alabama, with Case No. 7:16-cv-00197-TMP.

Lehr Middlebrooks will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Al Vreeland          $375
         Claire Martin        $250
         Paralegals           $125

Lehr Middlebrooks will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Al Vreeland, a partner at Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Lehr Middlebrooks can be reached at:

     Al Vreeland, Esq.
     LEHR MIDDLEBROOKS VREELAND
     & THOMPSON, P.C.
     2021 3rd Ave North
     Birmingham, AL 35203
     Tel: (205) 326-3002

                   About Randolph and Randolph

Randolph and Randolph LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 17-72125) on Dec. 8,
2017.  In the petition signed by Harold E. Randolph, its member,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
less than $100,000.  Judge Jennifer H. Henderson presides over the
case.  Newell & Holden, LLC, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.
Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson, P.C., is the Debtor's
special counsel.


RENNOVA HEALTH: CEO Apologizes for Quarterly Report Filing Delay
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer Seamus Lagan of Rennova Health, Inc.
rejoins host Everett Jolly to give an update on their financial
statement's delayed release, Jamestown Hospital acquisition
potential, and plans for increasing revenues.

In an interview with Everett Jolly on Uptick Newswire's "Stock
Day", Mr. Lagan said "All I can do is apologize to everybody that
we are late in getting this filed.  The company has been undergoing
multiple staffing changes since the first quarter.  The company has
been successful in securing expertise in the rural hospital sector,
but this change coupled with the new hospital acquisition resulted
in a delay to their filing.  We're actually dotting I's and
crossing T's on the final document, and expect to have it filed in
the next 24 to 48 hours, or at latest by the beginning of the
week."

Everett asked Lagan about the company's Jamestown hospital
acquisition as well, inquiring about potential revenues from the
project.  Lagan has high hopes for this project, and said, "It
should give our shareholders a lot of confidence that we are able
to complete this acquisition and should hopefully give them some
trust in our determination to turn this company around and grow our
revenues.  The new hospital is off to a good start and has a strong
relationship with the local doctors and the surrounding community.
The process of acquiring an operating facility was very different
from building one up from scratch."  When asked about the company's
first hospital, Lagan assured Jolly that it is doing well.  "Its
revenues are increasing, collections are kicking in and it is doing
well.  We are looking at what additional services we can provide to
increase the revenue."

Everett further questioned the CEO on plans for the rest of the
year and additional acquisitions.

To listen to the full interview and hear more from the CEO about
the company's plans, please follow the link below.

https://upticknewswire.com/featured-interview-ceo-seamus-lagan-of-rennova-health-inc-otcqb-rnva-4/

                       About Rennova Health

Rennova Health, Inc. -- http://www.rennovahealth.com/-- provides
diagnostics and supportive software solutions to healthcare
providers.  The Company's principal lines of business are
diagnostic laboratory services, supportive software solutions and
decision support and informatics services.  The company is
headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Rennova Health reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $108.53 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$32.61 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of Dec. 31,
2017, Rennova Health had $6.29 million in total assets, $41.06
million in total liabilities, $5.83 million in redeemable preferred
stock, and a total stockholders' deficit of $40.61 million.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Green &
Company, CPAs, in Tampa, Florida, the Company's auditor since 2015,
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the
Company has significant net losses, cash flow deficiencies,
negative working capital and accumulated deficit.  Those conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


RK & GROUP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on June 18 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of RK & Group Inc.

                        About RK & Group

RK & Group Inc., based in Goose Creek, SC, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 18-02178) on April 30, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Rhonda L. Kilgore, president, the Debtor
estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. John E. Waites presides over the
case.  Michael R. Drose, Esq., at Drose Law Firm, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


ROSEGARDEN HEALTH: PCO Hires Barbara H. Katz as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Joseph J. Tomaino, the court appointed Patient Care Ombudsman of
The Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC, and its
debtor-affiliates, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Connecticut to employ Barbara H. Katz, as
counsel to the PCO.

The PCO requires Barbara H. Katz to:

   a. provide the PCO legal advice with respect to his duties,
      obligations and powers as PCO during the continuance of the
      Chapter 11 case;

   b. represent the PCO as an interested party in connection with
      any proceedings in the bankruptcy case which effect the
      rights of the PCO and the patients residing in the Debtors'
      facilities;

   c. prepare and file on behalf of the PCO any necessary
      pleadings, reports and other legal papers; and

   d. perform all other legal services for the PCO as may be
      necessary or appropriate.

Barbara H. Katz will be paid at the hourly rate of $375.

Barbara H. Katz will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Barbara H. Katz, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtors and their estates.

Barbara H. Katz can be reached at:

     Barbara H. Katz, Esq.
     57 Trumbull Street
     New Haven, CT 06510
     Tel: (203) 772-4828

              About The Rosegarden Health and
                 Rehabilitation Center LLC

Located in Waterbury, Connecticut, Bridgeport Health Care Center
and The Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC --
http://www.bridgeporthealthcarecenter.com/-- provide long and
short-term nursing care and rehabilitation services.  Bridgeport
offers nursing care, Alzheimer's care, rehab/physical therapy,
wound care, dietary, respite care, and hospice care.

Rosegarden services include 24-hour nursing care, APRN on Staff,
short-term/long-term rehab, physical therapy, speech therapy,
occupational therapy, IV therapy/medical/incontinence management,
CPAP/BIPAP/ tracheotomy care, podiatry; dental, audiology services,
respiratory care, among others.

Bridgeport Health Care Center Inc. and a related debtor The
Rosegarden Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Conn. Case Nos. 18-50488 and 18-30623,
respectively) on April 18, 2018.  In the petitions signed by its
chief financial officer, Chaim Stern, Bridgeport estimated assets
and liabilities of less than $50 million, and Rosegarden Health
estimated assets and liabilities less than $10 million.

The Hon. Julie A. Manning is the case judge.

Richard L. Campbell, Esq., at White and Williams LLP, serves as the
Debtors' counsel.

William K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2, in
furtherance of his administrative responsibilities and the Order
entered by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District Of
Connecticut on May 11, 2018, has appointed Joseph J. Tomaino as
patient care ombudsman in the cases.  The PCO hired Barbara H.
Katz, as counsel.


ROTINI INC: Unsecured Creditors to Get 11.4% in 3 Annual Payments
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Rotini, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Columbia a plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure
statement.

Under the plan, Class 3 which is the priorty tax claims of the
District of Columbia will receive payment a lump sum payment in the
amount of $300,000 on the Effective date of the Plan. In addition,
Class 3 will receive payment in full on the remaining $308,722.75,
plus post confirmation interest (4%) in deferred cash payments in
sixty months (60) monthly installments in the amount of $5,686,
with the first monthly payment commencing within thirty (30) days
of the Effective Date.

General unsecured claims, classified in Class 9, total $447,258.48.
Class 9 claims will not be paid in full. Rather, these claims will
be paid a total of $51,000, approximately 11.4% of the total amount
due. Payment to this class will be made in pro rata distributions
in three (3) equal annual payments of $17,000. Payments will be
made each year commencing two (2) years after the effective date of
the plan.

Payment to these claims will be funded by the Debtor's operations
as may be necessary to adequately fund the plan, in addition to any
cash reserves the Debtor may have on hand and/or receive from
family/friend contributions, as is necessary.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/dcb17-00270-138.pdf

                        About Rotini Inc.

Located in Washington, DC, Rotini Inc. is a small business debtor
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D) and is engaged in the
restaurants business.  It first sought bankruptcy protection on
June 14, 2013 (Bankr. D.D.C. Case No. 13-00380) and then on Sept.
23, 2014 (Bank. D.D.C. Case No. 14-00514).

Rotini, Inc., and affiliate TK Restaurant Management, Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.D.C.
Case Nos. 17-00270 and 17-00269) on May 6, 2017.  In the petitions
signed by president Karen Kowkabi, Rotini estimated assets of less
than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million, and TK
Restaurant estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
less than $1 million.

Judge S. Martin Teel, Jr. presides over the cases.  

Gilman & Edwards, LLC, is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


ROXWELL PERFORMANCE: Court Dismisses R. Muniz Appeal as Moot
------------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of Texas dismissed the appeals case captioned
ROGER MUNIZ, Appellant, v. UNIQUE INTEGRATED ENERGY, LLC, Appellee,
No. 11-13-00310-CV (Tex. App.) as moot.

Appellant, Roger Muniz, filed an accelerated appeal from a
temporary injunction. The trial court had enjoined Appellant from
continuing to engage in the business affairs of
Intervenor/Defendant, RoxWell Performance Drilling, LLC, for which
the trial court subsequently appointed a receiver.

Appellee informed the court that the bankruptcy court had issued a
final decree closing RoxWell's bankruptcy proceeding in 2016 and
that RoxWell had not only been liquidated during that proceeding
but had also been terminated as an entity by the bankruptcy
trustee. Appellee provided the court with pertinent documents that
support Appellee's assertions. Appellee also suggested that this
appeal "would now appear to be moot." The Court agrees and
dismisses the appeal.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated May 17, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2LMwPNl from Leagle.com.

Fernando M. Bustos, Randall L. Rouse -- rrouse@lcalawfirm.com --
for Roxwell Performance Drilling, LLC.

Murray A. "Trey" Crutcher, III, Gary E. Ramirez, for Unique
Integrated Energy, LLC, Appellee.

Bryan Davis, Roger Muniz, Clark H. Rucker --
clark.rucker@kellyhart.com -- Hugh G. Connor, II --
hugh.connor@kellyhart.com -- Michael D. Anderson --
michael.anderson@kellyhart.com -- for Roger Muniz, Appellant.

RoxWell Performance Drilling LLC voluntarily filed for Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Protection in November 2013 in Texas Northern Bankruptcy
Court (case number 13-bk-50301).


RSF 17872: Seeks to Increase Orb Postpetition Credit to $5.5-Mil.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
RSF 17872 Via De Fortuna LLC amended the disclosure statement
explaining its first amended plan of reorganization to provide that
Class 3 secured claim of Greg Agee Construction, Inc., will be paid
in full no later than the later of 30 days after the Completion
Fees of $400,000 come due.  Agee Construction will retain its lien
on the Property, unmodified, until claim is paid in full. Total
secured claim amount is approximately $400,000.00.

The general contractor renovating the Property is Agee
Construction.  On October 21, 2015, Agee Construction recorded a
mechanics' lien claim against the Property in the amount of
$1,415,656.28 for the "reasonable value of work, materials and
services rendered towards the work of improvements" at the
Property.  On February 25, 2017, Agee Construction filed a secured
proof of claim against the Debtor's bankruptcy estate in the amount
of $1,415,656.28. A substantial portion of the secured claim of
Agee has been satisfied through payments made from the postpetition
financing provided by Orb Capital, LLC, to the Debtor.  In addition
to any amounts due for ongoing work and payment of subcontractors,
Agee will be entitled upon completion of the project, issuance of a
certificate of occupancy and presentation of final subcontractor
invoices to a payment of accumulated profit, supervision and
overhead of approximately $400,000.

Post-petition, the Court authorized the Debtor to obtain a $3
million secured line of credit from Orb Capital, LLC, a related
entity.  The Debtor used the funds from this line of credit to pay
administrative expenses, pay contractors and subcontractors (other
than Age Construction) with mechanics' liens against the Property,
and to pay other expenses necessary to resume the stalled
renovation project at the Property.

As of June 11, 2018, Orb has funded approximately $2,830,000 on the
line of credit, and it is anticipated that the full $3 million will
have been funded by the time of any hearing on confirmation of the
Debtor's Plan. Additionally, the Debtor has sought an increase in
the line of credit provided by Orb to $5,500,000. At full funding
of the initial authorization of $3,000,000, annual interest
payments to Orb would total $90,000. At full funding of the
increased line resulting in $5.5 million due, the interest payments
would total $165,000 annually.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/casb16-04436-182.pdf

               About RSF 17872 Via De Fortuna LLC

RSF 17872 Via De Fortuna LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Calif. Case No. 16-04436) on July
22, 2016.  The petition was signed by Black Rock Thoroughbreds,
LLLP, the Debtor's manager.  The Debtor is represented by Todd
Ringstad, Esq., at Ringstad & Sanders LLP.  At the time of the
filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at $10 million to $50
million and debts at $1 million to $10 million.
   
No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.




S CHASE LIMITED: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
-----------------------------------------------------
S Chase Limited Partnership., et al., filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas a joint
disclosure statement in support of joint plan of liquidation.

The Plan provides for the sale of the Real Properties in connection
with the Sale Motion which will allow Qualified Bidders to submit
Qualified Bids in connection with Bankruptcy Court approved bid
procedures and may provide for a Stalking Horse Bidder and Stalking
Horse Bid. The Successful Bid shall be submitted to the Bankruptcy
Court for approval and entry of the Sale Order. The Sale Order must
be entered prior to the Effective Date. The proceeds of the sale
shall be distributed pursuant to the terms of the Plan.

To the extent Debtors lack sufficient funds from reserve account to
fund repairs to the properties, the Debtors may seek Bankruptcy
Court approval of the DIP Facility in accordance with the terms of
the DIP Term Sheet which provides the Debtors with up to a $2
million facility to be utilized for repairs to the Real Properties
prior to the sale, subject to the Carve Out. If approved, Juniper
will be granted super priority senior secured liens on the Real
Properties in connection with the credit granted under the DIP
Facility. Within fourteen (14) days of the Effective Date and prior
to any distributions to any Allowed Class 1, Class 2, Class 3,
Class 4 Claims or Allowed Class 5 Interests, the DIP Facility shall
be repaid from the Net Sale Proceeds, unless Juniper is the
Successful Bidder and elects to credit bid this claim. If Juniper
is the Successful Bidder, any portion of the DIP Facility which is
credit bid will not be required to be repaid.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb18-31017-145.pdf

               About S Chase Limited Partnership

Each of S Chase Limited Partnership, Crosswinds Houston Limited
Partnership and W Point Limited Partnership is an apartment owner
based in Houston, Texas.

S Chase Limited Partnership, d/b/a Seton Chase Apartments;
Crosswinds Houston Limited Partnership, d/b/a Crosswinds
Apartments; and W Point Limited Partnership, d/b/a Willowbrook
Point Apartments, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 18-31017, 18-31018, and 18-31020) on March 5, 2018.

In the petitions signed by CFO Gordon Steele, S Chase Limited and
Crosswinds Houston estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets
and debt; and W Point Limited estimated $1 million to $10 million
in assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50 million.

The Hon. Marvin Isgur presides over the case.

The Debtors tapped Hoover Slovacek LLP as their bankruptcy
counsel.

The Court, on its own motion, entered an order requiring the Office
of the United States Trustee to appoint an examiner under 11 U.S.C.
Section 1104(c) to investigate whether the Debtors' apartment
properties comply with applicable federal, state and local laws
concerning the health, safety and welfare of the residents or the
public at the three properties.  Bryon A. Parffrey was appointed as
examiner.  The order required that the examiner file a report, by
March 21, 2018, identifying any health, safety, or welfare concerns
found on each property and, if found, recommend a course of action
to promptly protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents
or public.  The Court found that Mr. Parffrey had fulfilled his
requirements and was released from his appointment.


SANDY CREEK: Bank Debt Trades at 10% Off
----------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Sandy Creek Energy
Associates is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 89.90
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 4.99 percentage points from the
previous week. Sandy Creek pays 400 basis points above LIBOR to
borrow under the $1.025 billion facility. The bank loan matures on
November 6, 2020. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and Standard & Poor's
gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one of the biggest
gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted syndicated loans with
five or more bids in secondary trading for the week ended Friday,
June 8.                                    



SCHAFFEL DEVELOPMENT: Taps Lewis Landau as Bankruptcy Attorney
--------------------------------------------------------------
Schaffel Development Company, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to hire
Lewis Landau, Esq., as its legal counsel.

Mr. Landau will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.  

Mr. Landau will charge an hourly fee of $495 for his services.  He
received a pre-bankruptcy retainer of $22,513 from the Debtor.

In a court filing, Mr. Landau disclosed that he does not hold any
interest adverse to the Debtor's estate, creditors or equity
security holders.

Mr. Landau maintains an office at:

     Lewis R. Landau, Esq.
     22287 Mulholland Highway, Suite 318
     Calabasas, CA 91302
     Voice and Fax: (888)822-4340
     Email: Lew@Landaunet.com

                  About Schaffel Development Co.

Schaffel Development Company, Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11411) on
June 1, 2018.  In the petition signed by Gary Schaffel, president,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities
of less than $500,000.


SERTA SIMMONS: Bank Debt Trades at 13% Off
------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Serta Simmons
Bedding LLC is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 87.22
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents a decrease of 0.92                                 
                                                        percentage
points from the previous week. Serta Simmons pays 350 basis points
above LIBOR to borrow under the $1.95 billion facility. The bank
loan matures on November 8, 2023. Moody's rates the loan 'B3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B-' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, June 8.                                    


SHILLINGTON SOCIAL: M&T Bank to Get $491 Over 15 Years
------------------------------------------------------
Shillington Social Quarters filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania a combined plan and
disclosure statement to divulge adequate information to the holders
of claims or interests.

Class 1 claimants will be paid the amount of their secured claim as
filed, together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and
amortized and paid over 15 years in 180 monthly installments of
principal and interest. The only Class 1 claimant is M & T Bank,
who filed a secured claim in the amount of $58,233.16. Monthly
payments to M & T Bank in the amount of $491.40 will commence
thirty (30) days from the date of confirmation of this Plan. The
Class 1 Claimant will retain its lien unimpaired.

Class 2 claimants will be paid the amount of their secured claim as
filed, together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum and
amortized and paid over 5 years in 60 monthly installments of
principal and interest. The only Class 2 claimant is the Berks
County Tax Claim Bureau who filed a secured claim in the amount of
$17,807.99. Monthly payments to Berks County Tax Claim Bureau in
the amount of $369.66 will commence thirty (30) days from the date
of confirmation of this Plan. The Class 2 Claimant will retain its
lien unimpaired.

There are no general unsecured claims filed against the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-16456-46.pdf

               About Shillington Social Quarters

Shillington Social Quarters sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-16456) on
September 21, 2017.  Judge Richard E. Fehling presides over the
case.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$100,000.


SHILLINGTON SOCIAL: Seeks Conditional Approval of Plan Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Shillington Social Quarters filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania an application for
conditional approval of disclosure statement explaining its plan
and for fixing of dates for the filing of acceptances or rejections
to the Debtor's combined disclosure statement and plan, on June 11,
2018.

Class 1 claimants will be paid the amount of their secured claim as
filed, together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and
amortized and paid over 15 years in 180 monthly installments of
principal and interest. The only Class 1 claimant is M & T Bank,
who filed a secured claim in the amount of $58,233.16. Monthly
payments to M & T Bank in the amount of $491.40 will commence
thirty (30) days from the date of confirmation of this Plan. The
Class 1 Claimant will retain its lien unimpaired.

Class 2 claimants will be paid the amount of their secured claim as
filed, together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum and
amortized and paid over 5 years in 60 monthly installments of
principal and interest. The only Class 2 claimant is the Berks
County Tax Claim Bureau who filed a secured claim in the amount of
$17,807.99. Monthly payments to Berks County Tax Claim Bureau in
the amount of $369.66 will commence thirty (30) days from the date
of confirmation of this Plan. The Class 2 Claimant will retain its
lien unimpaired.

There are no general unsecured claims filed against the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-16456-46.pdf

               About Shillington Social Quarters

Shillington Social Quarters sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-16456) on
September 21, 2017.  Judge Richard E. Fehling presides over the
case.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$100,000.


SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: C&T to Get $2.2MM from Iris Property Sale Proceeds
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Shiraz Holdings, LLC, filed with the U.s. Bankrutpcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida a third amended disclosure statement
explaining its plan of reorganization.

Under the plan, C&T Financial will either: (1) be paid the amount
of their Allowed Claim, plus all accrued interest, Fees and
Expenses, that, collectively, will not exceed $2,263,897.07, from
proceeds of the sale of the Iris Property, which will be pending as
of June 30, 2018; or (2) if a sale of the Iris Property is not
pending as of June 30, 2018, C&T: (a) will receive the Iris
Property excepting all
contents of the Iris Property existing on or about May 15, 2018,
free and clear of all Liens, Claims, and Interests through
quitclaim deed, that will be delivered within one week from entry
of the Confirmation Order to counsel for C&T.

Upon closing on the sale of the Hurricane Property, CCOP LLC will
get $2,626,587.59 plus no more than $20,000.00 for actual attorney
fees and costs were paid to the attorney trust account of counsel
for United Community Bank, Andersen, Tate & Carr, P.C.,in full and
final satisfaction of any and all claims
of CCOP against Debtor, with funds first distributed to lienholder
United Community Bank in an amount necessary to satisfy its claims
and liens against the Hurricane Property and any remaining balance
delivered second to CCOP.

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-17968-248.pdf

                     About Shiraz Holdings

Shiraz Holdings, LLC, based in Delray Beach, Fla., filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-17968) on June 26, 2017.
In the petition signed by Jordan A. Satary, managing member, the
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Paul G. Hyman, Jr. presides over the case.
Thomas M. Messana, Esq., at Messana, P.A., serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.  Fadi Elkhatib and Ten-X, LLC, serve as the
Debtor's real estate broker.  Ten-X, LLC, is the Debtor's
auctioneer.


SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: Plan Solicitation Period Extended Until July 31
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mindy A. Mora of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, at the behest of Shiraz Holdings,
LLC, has extended Debtor's exclusive right to solicit acceptances
of a plan of reorganization is extended through and including July
31, 2018, without prejudice to seek further extensions.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor sought for an extension of its exclusivity period to solicit
acceptances for a period of not less than 30 days because (a) it is
in the process of negotiating with its creditors, (b) it has
engaged brokers to help facilitate the sale of leases of its
properties, and (c) it has reached certain settlements that should
prove helpful in its reorganization efforts.

On Dec. 23, 2017, the Debtor filed Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization and Disclosure Statement. Thereafter, on March 23,
2018, the Debtor filed its Amended Chapter 11 Plan of
Reorganization and Amended Disclosure Statement. On April 16, 2018,
the Debtor filed its Second Amended Disclosure Statement in
Connection together with its Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization. The
disclosure hearing has been set for June 12, pursuant to the
Court's Order.

Although several, if not all of the factors under Section
1121(d)(1) for consideration support granting Debtor's requested
extension of the Exclusivity Period, the Debtor asserted that:

     (1) This case is both large and complex. The assets and
liabilities of Debtor are in excess of millions of dollars.
Moreover, issues in the real estate and capital market, which are
known to the Court, have added complication to this case;

     (2) The Debtor requires additional time to negotiate and
prepare adequate information. The Debtor continues to negotiate
with creditors to advance restructuring of its debt;

     (3) The Debtor continues to progress toward reorganization in
good faith and has already filed both the Plan and Disclosure
Statement. No trustee has been appointed and no party has ever
alleged that Debtor is not proceeding in good faith;

     (4) The Debtor continues to manage and maintain its real
estate during this proceeding and is paying its post-petition
debts;

     (5) The Debtor continues to negotiate with creditors in good
faith;

     (6) This case has only been pending a relatively short time
for Debtor to navigate the current, difficult real estate and
credit markets;

     (7) The Debtor is not seeking this extension to pressure
creditors; and

     (8) The Debtor's bankruptcy case involves several unresolved
contingencies, including negotiations with potential claimants and
analysis of the most prudent method of maximizing value of Debtor's
assets.

                     About Shiraz Holdings

Shiraz Holdings, LLC, based in Delray Beach, Fla., filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-17968) on June 26, 2017.
In the petition signed by Jordan A. Satary, managing member, the
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Paul G. Hyman, Jr. presides over the case.
Thomas M. Messana, Esq., at Messana, P.A., serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.  Fadi Elkhatib and Ten-X, LLC, serve as the
Debtor's real estate broker.  Ten-X, LLC, is the Debtor's
auctioneer.


SKILLSOFT CORP: Bank Debt Trades at 19% Off
-------------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Skillsoft
Corporation is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 81.25
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents a decrease of 0.51 percentage points from the
previous week. Skillsoft Corporation pays 825 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $185 million facility. The bank loan
matures on April 28, 2022. Moody's rates the loan 'Caa3' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'CCC' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, June 8.                                    


SPEED VEGAS: Sr. Loan Lenders to Get 0% to 5% Under Amended Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Speed Vegas, LLC, amended the disclosure statement explaining its
Chapter 11 liquidating plan to provide that holders of Class 4 -
Prepetition Senior Loan Claims will recover an estimated 0% to 5%
as compared to an unknown recovery proposed in the original plan.

The Debtor also disclosed a Court-approved stipulation with Gwen
Ward, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Craig Sherwood;
Gwen Ward, individually and as surviving spouse of Craig Sherwood,
deceased; and Gwen Ward, as guardian of Zane Sherwood, surviving
minor child of Craig Sherwood, deceased (collectively, the
"Sherwood Parties").  On Oct. 11, 2017, the Sherwood Parties had
filed a Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay to pursue their
wrongful death claim(s) against the Debtor in the Eighth Judicial
District Court, Clark County, Nevada.  The Motion stated that the
Sherwood Parties would look only to insurance with respect to their
claims against the Debtor. Accordingly, through the stipulation,
the parties agreed to the modification of the automatic stay, on a
limited basis, to permit the Sherwood Parties to liquidate their
claims, and if the Debtor's insurers do not settle the matter prior
to litigation, to proceed to judgment.  The parties further agreed
that the Sherwood Parties would not file, execute on or pursue
collection on any judgment absent further Order of the Bankruptcy
Court.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-11752-236.pdf

                        About Speed Vegas

Speed Vegas, LLC -- https://speedvegas.com/ -- owns a car racing
track in the Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.  Speed Vegas allows guests
to drive sports cars around a custom race track: a 1.5 mile track,
with a half mile straight.  Racers can choose from a multi-million
dollar collection of exotic supercars: Ferrari, Lamborghini,
Porsche, Mercedes and more.

Alleged creditors Phil Fiore, Velocita, LLC, EME Driving, LLC,
Thomas Garcia, Sloan-Speed, LLC, and T-VV, LLC, filed an
involuntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 17-11752)
against Speed Vegas on Aug. 12, 2017.  The petitioning creditors
are represented by Steven K. Kortanek, Esq., at Drinker, Biddle, &
Reath LLP.

On Dec. 15, 2017, the Delaware Court converted the involuntary
bankruptcy petition to a voluntary action.  

The Hon. Kevin J. Carey presides over the case.  

Bielli & Klauder, LLC, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


STAPLES INC: Bank Debt Trades at 2% Off
---------------------------------------
Participations in a syndicated loan under which Staples
Incorporated is a borrower traded in the secondary market at 97.78
cents-on-the-dollar during the week ended Friday, June 8, 2018,
according to data compiled by LSTA/Thomson Reuters MTM Pricing.
This represents an increase of 0.66 percentage points from the
previous week. Staples Incorporated pays 400 basis points above
LIBOR to borrow under the $2.9 billion facility. The bank loan
matures on September 12, 2024. Moody's rates the loan 'B1' and
Standard & Poor's gave a 'B+' rating to the loan. The loan is one
of the biggest gainers and losers among 247 widely quoted
syndicated loans with five or more bids in secondary trading for
the week ended Friday, June 8.                                    


SUNCOAST INTERNAL: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended to Aug. 8
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Catherine Peek McEwen of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida, at the behest of Suncoast Internal
Medicine Consultants, P.A., has extended the exclusive period for
the Debtor to file a plan until August 8, 2018, and the exclusive
period for the Debtor to obtain acceptance of a plan is extended
until 60 days thereafter.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor asked the Court to extend by 60 days or until July 18, 2018,
the deadline for the filing of its plan of reorganization and the
exclusivity periods. The Debtor told the Court that it would like
to see additional post-petition performance before filing a plan
and disclosure statement. The Debtor's counsel has discussed this
motion and the requested relief with counsel for the two largest
creditors in the case, USAmeribank and ASD Specialty Healthcare,
and neither opposes the requested extension.

          About Suncoast Internal Medicine Consultants

Based in Largo, Florida, Suncoast Internal Medicine Consultants, PA
-- http://suncoastinternalmedicine.com/-- provides medical care to
Pinellas County and the Greater Tampa Bay area.  Its staff is
composed of board-certified physicians focusing in the specialties
of internal medicine, gastroenterology, and rheumatology. Suncoast
was founded in 1965 by Dr. George Kotsch.

Suncoast Internal Medicine Consultants sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-00399) on Jan. 19, 2018.  In the petition signed by Robert L.
DiGiovanni, DO, president, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Catherine Peek McEwen presides over the case.  

The Debtor hired Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns LLP as its
bankruptcy counsel; and Appelt & Associates, CPAS, PA as its
accountant.


TEXAS E&P: Trustee Selling Gillis-English Bayou Unit Interest
-------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Searcy, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Texas E&P Operating,
Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of
Texas to authorize the sale of the Debtor's estate, consisting of a
leasehold interest in the Gillis-English Bayou Unit located in
Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, and all fixtures and equipment
associated therewith, to Richmond Engineering, Inc. for $350,000,
subject to higher and better offers.

A portion of the Debtor's estate is consists of the Property.  It
also owns a mobile home, a tractor, and a computer equipment used
in connection with the Property which for purposes of the Motion
are included in the definition of Property.

The Trustee has been tendered an offer to purchase the Property in
the amount of $350,000 from Richmond, 1101 E. Arapaho Road, Suite
120, Richardson, Texas.  He desires to accept the Purchase Offer
and sell the Property.

Upon approval of the Motion, the Trustee will enter into and
execute appropriate documents to transfer ownership of the Property
in furtherance thereof and will sign appropriate documents
transferring the operating rights to the wells located on the
Property to Richmond or its designee.  Notwithstanding any other
provision therein, he will continue to consider any offers or bids
in amounts higher than the proposed Purchase Price from any third
parties (provided that Richmond will have the right to match any
such higher offer) and any proposed order on the Motion will be
submitted for the highest and best offer received before June 12,
2018.

Prosperity Bank holds a perfected mortgage and lien against the oil
and gas leases to be transferred and sold pursuant to the Motion
and more fully described in the Debtor's schedules.  Accordingly,
the Trustee and Prosperity Bank have agreed that the sale proceeds
will be divided with the Debtor's estate receiving and retaining
$50,000 for its sale of the mobile home, tractor and other
equipment not subject to the Prosperity Bank lien, and the balance
will be paid first to any unpaid ad valorem taxes and then to
Prosperity Bank to be applied to is secured loan.  

The sale is proposed to be free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances with any valid liens, claims or encumbrances attaching
to the appropriate sale proceeds.  The Trustee believes this offer
to be reasonable.

To the best of Trustee's knowledge and belief, the prospective
Purchaser is owned or controlled by Mark Plummer, the owner of the
Debtor.  The Trustee has offered the Property for sale to a number
of other oil and gas companies and no offers comparable to the
sPurchase Offer have been received.

A copy of the Letter of Intent attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/Texas_E&P_180_Sales.pdf

                   About Texas E&P Operating

Based in Richardson, Texas, the Texas E&P group of companies --
http://texasepgroup.com/-- offer direct investment opportunities
in its oil and natural gas projects in the Southwestern United
States.  From the initial investment to the production of each
well, the Group oversees each phase of development.  Texas E&P
Operating is an independent oil and natural gas operator, with
specialties in developing new and existing oil fields since 1994.
Texas E&P Funding manages a diverse offering of oil and natural Gas
investments.  Texas E&P Well Service is in the well work-over and
completion industry, with dedication to safety and innovation.

Texas E&P Operating, Inc., f/k/a Chestnut Exploration and
Production, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34386) on Nov. 29, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Mark A. Plummber, president, the Debtor
estimated its assets and liabilities at between $10 million and $50
million.

Judge Stacey G. Jernigan presides over the case.

John Mark Chevallier, Esq., at McGuire, Craddock & Strother, P.C.,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors' in the Debtor's case.  The Committee retained
Okin Adams LLP as its legal counsel.

On Jan. 19, 2018, Jason Searcy was appointed as the Debtor's
Chapter 11 trustee. The Trustee hired Searcy & Searcy, P.C., as
bankruptcy counsel.  Snow Spence Green LLP, is the special counsel.


TK RESTAURANT: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% in 3 Annual Payments
------------------------------------------------------------------
TK Restaurant Management, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court a plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure
statement.

The purpose of the PLan is to allow the reorganized Debtor to
continue with its operations. Upon confirmation of the plan, the
Debtor will maintain operations and make all distributions under
the Plan. The Debtor will continue to be owned and operated by
Karen and Tony Kowkabi.

The Debtor had assets totaling $42,494.  Class 3 consists of the
priority claims asserted by the District of Columbia for unpaid
sales and use tax, franchise corporate taxes, and withholding taxes
in the amount $211,891.  Class 3 will receive payment in full, plus
post confirmation interest (4%) in deferred cash payments plus one
additional lump sum payment. The Debtor will make a lump sum
payment to the District in the amount of $150,000 on the Effective
Date. Additionally, the Debtor will make deferred cash payments on
the remaining balance due ($61,891) in sixty (60) monthly
installments in the amount of $1140, with the first monthly payment
commencing within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date. Payment
to these claims will be funded by the Debtor's operations as may be
necessary to adequately fund the plan, in addition to any cash
reserves the Debtor may have on hand and/or receive from
family/friend contributions, as is necessary.

Class 4 consists of the IRS' priority claim as reflected in its
proof of claim in the amount of $400,624.09.   Class 4 will receive
payment in full, plus post confirmation interest (4%) in deferred
cash payments. The Debtor will make payments to these claims in
sixty (60) monthly installments in the amount of $7,378 with the
first monthly payment commencing within thirty (30) days of the
Effective Date. Payment to these claims will be funded by the
Debtor's operations as may be necessary to adequately fund the
plan, in addition to any cash reserves debtor may have on hand
and/or receive from family/friends contributions, as is necessary.

General unsecured claims, classified in Class 8, total $234,589.62.
Class 8 Class 8 claims will not be paid in full. Rather, these
claims will be paid a total of $51,000, approximately 22% of the
total amount due. Payment to this class will be made in pro rata
distributions in three (3) equal annual payments of $17,000.
Payments will be made each year commencing two (2) years after the
effective date of the plan. This Class is impaired.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/dcb17-00269-153.pdf

                About TK Restaurant Management

TK Restaurant Management, Inc., is a corporation duly organized
under the laws of the District of Columbia.  The Debtor owns and
operates the restaurant known as "Catch 15," which has been located
in the historic Peyser Building near the White House since 2013,
providing seafood dishes as well as fine Italian cuisine.  The
Restaurant is operated by Karen Kowkabi and her husband, Gholam
("Tony") Kowkabi, an experienced restauranteur for more than thirty
years.

TK Restaurant Management filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
District of Columbia Case No. 17-00269) on June 11, 2018, and is
represented by Richard L. Gilman, Esq., in Landover, Maryland.

This is TK Restaurant Management's second Chapter 11 filing.  On or
about September 23, 2014, to preserve its business and stay
collection efforts by the District of Columbia, TK Restaurant
Management filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case—In re TK
Management, Inc., Case No. 14-0562 (USBC DC).  With improved
business and reorganization efforts, TK Restaurant Management was
able to confirm its Chapter 11 plan on July 22, 2015.


TOP SHELF: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
-----------------------------------------------
Top Shelf Sports, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 plan of liquidation
providing for the orderly liquidation of the inventory and personal
property assets of the Debtor.

As of the Petition Date, the value for the Debtor's primary assets
totaled $681,596.  General unsecured claims in the total amount of
$745,793 have been asserted against the Debtor's estate.  Under the
Plan, once holders of Allowed Administrative Claims have been paid
in full, every time thereafter three deposits have been made into
the Unsecured Creditor Account, the balance of the account will be
distributed to general unsecured creditors.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-21301-95.pdf

                    About Top Shelf Sports

Top Shelf Sports, Inc., operates a retail store under the name Play
it Again Sports in the Littleton, Colorado area.  Play it Again
Sports sells new and used sporting goods equipment.  The company's
retail location has experienced decreased sales in recent years.

Top Shelf Sports, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-21301) on Dec. 13,
2017.  In the petition signed by David Bolle, owner, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$1 million.  Judge Kimberley H. Tyson presides over the case.  The
Debtor is represented by Buechler & Garber, LLC.  An official
committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been appointed in the
Chapter 11 case.


TRILOGY INTERNATIONAL: Fitch Affirms 'B-' IDR, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed all of Trilogy International Partners,
LLC's ratings, including the 'B-' Issuer Default Rating (IDR). The
Rating Outlook is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Operating Company Reliance: Trilogy is dependent upon distributions
including dividends, inter-company debt servicing payments, and
management fees from its two operating companies to service its
notes at the holdco level. Cash leakage on upstreaming dividends
occurs due to taxes and minority interests at both operating
companies. Distributions are also subject to foreign exchange risk
given the USD-denominated holdco debt structure and the local
currency of the EBITDA generation. NuevaTel has historically been a
dividend contributor and paid approximately $254 million in
dividends since 2008. 2degrees has not paid dividends in the past
and is subject to excess cash flow sweeps. A shareholder loan of
US$24 million provides a shorter-term path to upstream additional
cash with no cash leakage.

Improvement Expected in New Zealand: Operating performance fell
materially short of initial growth expectations in 2017 for New
Zealand driven by operational missteps that caused significant
customer service issues and led to lower than expected growth,
higher costs and elevated involuntary churn. Consequently, EBITDA
for 2017 was $83 million, up 5% with margins declining 90 basis
points to 24.3%. 2degrees has become more aggressive in recent
quarters with customer acquisition to offset subscriber losses
related to elevated churn in the upper 1% range. When combined with
costs related to a new branding campaign at the beginning of 2018,
first quarter EBITDA margins declined y-o-y by 530 basis points to
20.6% with EBITDA of $18 million or 18% lower than a year ago.

Further operational recovery is expected with improvement back-half
weighted that should result in improving EBITDA trends with growth
in the mid-to-upper single digits for 2018 provided postpaid churn
reverts to historical levels (1.3% or lower), which is expected on
a run rate basis by yearend. Postpaid ARPU could experience
additional modest pressure with declines in the low-single-digit
range due to further optimization of data plans. Trilogy has also
taken steps to improve local operational execution at 2degrees by
changing several key management positions.

Mature Bolivian Operations: The Bolivian operations (NuevaTel) have
experienced top-line pressures and mid-single-digit EBITDA declines
during the past several years. More recently, the continued
substitution from voice to data usage and subscriber losses caused
by a weak competitive position stemming from lack of LTE network
coverage has negatively affected prepaid revenues. Blended ARPU is
also under pressure due to mix and voice/data revenue declines.
With the LTE overlay largely finished, NuevaTel's LTE coverage and
performance is on-par or better than competitors in key areas.
Consequently, NuevaTel has become more aggressive with matching
competitive offers during the past two quarters in the prepaid
segment.

NuevaTel remains focused on monetizing the data opportunity around
the 3G-to-4G conversion with its prepaid subscriber base and expect
certain revenue enhancing opportunities related to content could
provide benefits in the second half of 2018. The low LTE
penetration rate (20% of customer base at March 31, 2018) also
creates an opportunity for NuevaTel to monetize further penetration
gains. Fitch assumes low-single digit EBITDA growth for NuevaTel in
2018.

OpCo Refinancing Expected: Fitch expects both 2degrees and NuevaTel
may refinance their loan facilities in 2018 to increase financial
flexibility. In New Zealand, 2degrees amended its senior facilities
agreement in March 2018 representing NZD190 million of the NCD200
million committed amount to extend the maturity date by one year to
January 2020. Consequently, 2degrees has NZD10 million maturing in
January 2019 and potential quarterly excess free cash flow sweep
payments in the second half of 2018. In Bolivia, amortization
payments are increasing over the next year and roughly $20-25
million will be required for a spectrum payment in 2019. Carve-outs
under the holdco notes enable some flexibility within the OpCo
capital structures to increase debt at the local operating
subsidiaries if required. Fitch believes if the refinancings do not
occur, liquidity could become more limited over the next 12 to 24
months, particularly if EBITDA generation does not improve as
expected in New Zealand.

Stable Leverage Mid-3x: Trilogy had core telecom leverage of 3.5x
at the end of 2017 adjusted for handset-related financial services
operations and minority dividend distributions. Fitch expects
leverage will remain within the mid-3x range depending on the
extent of M&A activity. To determine core telecom leverage, Fitch
has applied a 1:1 debt-to-equity ratio to the company's equipment
installment plan device receivables.

M&A Expected: Fitch expects Trilogy could engage in M&A
opportunities including asset monetizations that improve the
company's long-term growth prospects. The company may pursue
opportunistic strategic acquisitions in adjacent markets with the
highly fragmented and competitive New Zealand wireline market a
potential longer-term target. Fitch believes Trilogy would also
have strong interest in acquiring the remaining minority interest
in its 2degrees subsidiary.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Trilogy's rating (B-/Stable) reflects its weaker business and
financial profiles due to its small scale, material exposure to the
higher risk operational environment in Bolivia, challenger brand
strategy, low profitability and limited financial flexibility. Both
2degrees in New Zealand and NuevaTel in Bolivia compete against
much larger peers in relatively stable three-player markets at
approximately 24% and 23% market share respectively with
substantial exposure in both markets to lower-valued prepaid
subscribers.

In New Zealand, 2degrees competes against an operating subsidiary
of Vodafone (BBB+/Stable), which has much more expansive scale,
geographic scope and financial resources. In Bolivia, NuevaTel
competes against Tigo, an operating subsidiary of Millicom
International Cellular (MIC BB+/Stable). MIC's ratings reflect the
company's geographical diversification, strong brand recognition
and network quality, all of which have contributed to its leading
market positions in key markets, strong subscriber base, and solid
operating cash flow generation.

Trilogy's ratings are similar to Digicel Group Limited (B/Stable).
Digicel is a diversified telecom operator, with its operational
footprints across the Caribbean and South Pacific regions.
Digicel's ratings reflect the company's well-diversified
geographical operations with leading market positions, strong
network quality, and brand recognition, which support relatively
stable performance on a local-currency basis. Digicel has much more
scale, diversification, stronger market positions and higher
profitability than Trilogy. This compensates for Digicel's higher
financial leverage compared to Trilogy. Both companies have
experienced free cash flow deficits the past several years.

No country-ceiling or operating environment aspects impacts the
IDR. Fitch views the Bolivian operational environment in terms of
political, regulatory and economic conditions as potentially more
volatile than in developed markets. Nevertheless, the Bolivian
regulatory environment should remain relatively stable over the
ratings horizon given the current political regime term extends
until 2020. Bolivia has a low sovereign rating (BB-/Negative) and
low GDP per capita, although the country has generally experienced
higher GDP growth rates than its Latin American peers.

The Recovery Ratings for Trilogy's senior secured notes are
constrained to 'RR3' as Fitch's criteria on country groupings
provides a cap of 'RR4' on Bolivia and 'RR2' on New Zealand,
leading to a combined weighted cap of 'RR3'.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within Its Rating Case in 2018 for the
Issuer

  -- Consolidated EBITDA growth in the mid-single digits;

  -- Capex expenditures in a similar range as 2017;

  -- Refinancing of New Zealand and Bolivian loan facilities
assumed during 2018;

  -- Consolidated ending cash of roughly $80 million;

  -- Core telecom leverage in the mid 3x range;

  -- Annual operating cash costs of approximately $40 million
required for Trilogy at the holdco level that are funded by
existing HoldCo cash and distributions from Bolivia and New
Zealand.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  -- A material improvement in EBITDA generation from the New
Zealand operations due to sustained improvement in the operating
profile (postpaid churn in historical range of 1.2%-1.3%, stable
ARPUs, postpaid net addition growth) and relatively stable
operating performance in the Bolivian subsidiary;

  -- Sustained free cash flow on a consolidated basis;

  -- Demonstrated ability to upstream distributions from both New
Zealand and Bolivian operating subsidiaries.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  -- Insufficient liquidity (defined as maintaining less than six
months of interest payments at Trilogy) due to an inability or any
material limitations with upstreaming cash from its operating
subsidiaries. This could include any unforeseen impediment
(regulatory or of other nature) in upstreaming cash up to parent
level;

  -- Deterioration in operating profile of one or both operating
subsidiaries, including increase in subscriber churn, ARPU
pressure, loss of market share and decline in operating margins;

  -- Lack of ability to generate positive consolidated free cash
flow on a sustained basis;

  -- A material change in the Bolivian country risk including
regulatory, political, economic or foreign currency that adversely
affects operating cash flows;

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity Limited: Fitch views liquidity as limited with
consolidated cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of
approximately USD63 million for first quarter 2018, down from year
end-2017 of $71 million. Cash and cash equivalents held by Trilogy
subsidiaries include USD32 million and USD3 million held by
NuevaTel and 2degrees respectively leaving approximately $28
million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments at
corporate headquarters. Fitch expects Trilogy will target liquidity
in the range of $15 million to $30 million at the Holdco level,
which is approximately six months to one year of Holdco interest
expense.

Trilogy does not have a revolving bank facility at the holding
company level. Trilogy is also subject to foreign currency
fluctuations that could negatively affect debt servicing costs at
the holding company. Fitch does not expect the dividend (CAD0.02
per common share) at TIP Inc. will increase with cash dividend
requirements on an annualized basis expected at less than CAD1
million.

The consolidated leverage debt incurrence covenant (less than or
equal to 4x) in the holdco secured notes limits additional debt
within Trilogy's capital structure. However, carve-outs within the
indentures offers some additional debt flexibility. Carve-outs
include debt at the Bolivian subsidiary of USD50 million, permitted
receivables financing not to exceed NZD50 million and indebtedness
at 2degrees not to exceed the greater of aggregate total debt of
NZD245 million or on a pro forma basis, consolidated leverage of 2x
after incurrence of additional debt.

Both 2degrees and NuevaTel operations have local facilities
agreements to provide local debt capacity for operational support.
In New Zealand, 2degrees has a NZD200 million NZD (approximately
USD134 million based on exchange rates as of March 31, 2018) senior
facilities agreement consisting of NZD185 million facility (no
amortization) and a NZD15 million working capital facility. As of
March 31, 2018, the NZD185 million facility was fully drawn with
NZD1.9 million of available capacity on the working capital
facility. 2degrees has substantial cushion under its main covenants
that includes a senior leverage ratio of less than 3x. An
additional covenant requires a leverage ratio of 2x immediately
following a permitted dividend distribution.

In Bolivia, NuevaTel has a USD25 million syndicated loan with $20.0
million outstanding that matures in December 2021. The facility
amortizes by 10% in 2018 and increases to 26.7% the remaining three
years. NuevaTel has sufficient cushion within its financial
covenants and is subject to a profits test for dividend
distributions. In December 2017, NuevaTel entered into a $7.0
million bank loan agreement to fund capital expenditures.
Amortization payments are required to be repaid in equal quarterly
installments beginning in 2019 through 2022. The bank loan
agreement contains no financial covenants.

2degrees and NuevaTel also have spectrum related payments over the
rating horizon. 2degrees has approximately USD6 million to 7
million per year in 2018 and 2019 related to a long-term payable to
the government of New Zealand for the acquisition of it 700 MHz
license. NuevaTel's 30 MHz license in the 1900 MHz band expires in
November 2019. Fitch believes a reasonable proxy for this future
obligation was the USD23 million NuevaTel paid in 2014 for 30 MHz
of AWS spectrum.

Recovery

Recovery Rating Assumptions: The recovery analysis assumes the
enterprise value of Trilogy is maximized in a going concern
scenario versus liquidation. The Recovery Rating considers the
structural subordination to the local operating subsidiaries debt.
Fitch believes that the recovery analysis for Trilogy is best
performed using a sum-of-the-parts approach where a waterfall
analysis for recovery is performed individually for each operating
subsidiary and rolled up to the parent level. Consequently, Fitch
determined a post-default cash flow for each operating subsidiary
to establish the level of cash flow (EBITDA) upon which it is most
appropriate to base the valuation.

The post-default distressed cash flow, which assumes both depletion
of the current position to reflect the distress that provoked a
default, and a level of corrective action that Fitch assumes either
would have occurred during restructuring, or would be priced into a
purchase price by potential bidders. In the Bolivian operations,
this assumes a 40% decline to the company's run-rate EBITDA. For
the New Zealand operations, this assumes a 25% decline to the
run-rate EBITDA. The recovery analysis reflects a scenario in which
EBITDA declines as a result of a continued erosion of the
subscriber base in both Bolivia and New Zealand due to aggressive
price discounting by the larger, financially stronger competitors
and additional challenges for Bolivia, which could be due to a
combination of country risk factors including political, social,
economic and legal.

Fitch has assigned a multiple of 5x to NuevaTel (Bolivia) based on
the range of multiples used for similar companies using near-proxy
sectors in the LatAm region. New Zealand's multiple of 6.5x
reflects the better overall operating fundamentals than Bolivia
including market position, growth prospects and the country's
better ranking in creditor-friendly policies and general
enforceability (Group B vs. Group D for Bolivia) per country
groupings provided under Country-Specific Treatment of Recovery
Ratings criteria.

As a result, Fitch estimates a distressed consolidated enterprise
valuation of approximately $562 million. As part of its
assumptions, Fitch has taken a 10% administrative claim. The
recovery takes into account the minority stakes at each operating
subsidiary and assigns a proportionate EBITDA to Trilogy. Fitch's
recovery analysis also includes an additional discount related to
the withholding tax that is subject in Bolivia of 12.5% and New
Zealand of 5%.

Fitch uses a recovery cap based on an analysis weighted by the
economic value realized from Trilogy's existing markets of
operation in Bolivia and New Zealand per Fitch's 'Country Specific
Treatment of Recovery Ratings' criteria. The criteria limits the
upward notching of issue ratings from IDRs to reflect recovery
expectations for entities based on the impact of country-specific
factors. The criterion provides a cap of 'RR4' on Bolivia and 'RR2'
on New Zealand based on country groupings leading to a combined
weighted cap of 'RR3', thus constraining the Recovery Ratings for
the senior secured notes to 'RR3'. The waterfall analysis results
in a 63% recovery corresponding to a RR3 recovery for the holding
company secured notes.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Trilogy

  -- IDR at 'B-';

  -- Senior secured notes at 'B/RR3'.

Fitch has assigned the following rating:

Trilogy International Partners, Inc. (TIP Inc.)

  -- IDR 'B-'.


TUCSON ONE: Deficiency Claims Added in 1st Amended Plan
-------------------------------------------------------
Tucson One, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Arizona its first amended plan of reorganization dated
June 8, 2018.

The amended plan adds the deficiency claims against the Debtor in
Class 5. This consists of the unsecured balance of the bifurcated
claim of U.S. Bank. It will also maintain its top 10% guaranty of
Henry A. Goldman. The legal basis and justification for this
classification separate from the general unsecured creditors is
provided in In re Loop 76, 465 B.R. 525 (9th Cir. BAP 2012).

On the Effective Date, the Debtor will remit to the Class 5
Creditor a one-time payment in the amount $50,000 to fully satisfy
the Deficiency Claim. Upon payment of the $50,000, the Class 5
Creditor will release the guaranty of Henry A. Goldman. This class
is impaired.

The Plan will be implemented by the Debtor's Principal's new
capital contributions, and rental income from a new lease, or
sale.

A copy of the First Amended Plan dated June 8, 2018 is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb4-17-11219-65.pdf

                         About Tucson One

Headquartered in Ventura, California, Tucson One, LLC, is a single
asset real estate as that term is defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
101(51B).  It filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case No. 17-11219) on Sept. 22, 2017, estimating its assets
and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  Henry
Goldman, member and manager, signed the petition.  Judge Brenda
Moody Whinery presides over the case.  Neff & Boyer, P.C., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


VINCE’S BLACK: June 26 Status Hearing of Plan, Disclosures
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Donald R. Cassling of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois issued an order and notice of status
hearing on the Chapter 11 plan of liquidation and accompanying
disclosure.

June 26, 2018 at 10:00 A.M. is the status hearing on the plan and
disclosure statement.

Under the plan, the Holder of each Class 2 Secured Claims will be
paid from the liquidation of the collateral securing its Debt. Any
deficiency will be treated as an Allowed Deficiency claim and will
be paid, pro rata with all other Class 4 Claims.

Class 3 Priority Tax Claims will be paid pursuant to the priority
allowed under section 507(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Class 4 General Unsecured Claims will be paid in accordance with
Section 726 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Upon the Effective Date, the Liquidating Trustee will establish an
interest-bearing Disbursement Account in a United States Trustee
Authorized Depository Bank. The Liquidating Trustee will deposit
all liquidation proceeds into the Disbursement Account and will
thereafter make the disbursements.

Substantially all of the debtor's tangible assets, such as its
equipment, and inventory, were sold to GRJ Enterprises, Inc.,
pursuant to the Court's order dated Feb. 8, 2018 for $250,000.
Pursuant to the Court's order, any valid liens and encumbrances on
or against the assets attached to the sale proceeds. Presently, it
is unclear whether any creditor has a valid security interest which
attached to the proceeds of sale.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-36681-100.pdf

                 About Vince's Black Tie

Based in Downers Grove, Illinois, Vince's Black Tie, Inc., operates
an upscale tuxedo rental and sales establishment.  Operating for
over 10 years, Vince's claims to be a premier supplier of tuxedo
and suit rental and sales for men's apparel wear throughout the
Chicago metropolitan area.

Vince's Black Tie filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Case No. 17-36681) on Dec. 11, 2017.  In its petition, signed by
its president, Vincent P. Genova, the Debtor estimated assets of
below $50,000 and liabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.  The
Debtor tapped Laxmi Sarathy, Esq., as lead counsel, and David
Herzog, Esq., of Herzog & Schwartz, P.C. as her co-counsel.


VIRTUAL COMMUNICATIONS: Equity Contributions to Fund Proposed Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtual Communications Corporation filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Nevada a disclosure statement explaining
its proposed plan of reorganization.

Class 1 under the plan includes the Secured Claim of the Gewerter
Law Office in the approximate amount of $1,000, which is secured by
a prepetition retainer paid to the Gewerter Law Office. Each Holder
of an Allowed Class 1 Claim will receive payment in full in cash no
later than the 30th day after the Effective Date. Any Unsecured
Claim asserted by any Holder of an Allowed Class 1 Claim will be
treated as a Class 4 (General Unsecured) Claim. Class 1 is an
Impaired Class. Holders of Class 1 Claims are entitled to vote to
accept or reject the Plan.

Class 4 consists of all General Unsecured Claims against the Debtor
that are not based on or related to any Unsecured Note. The total
amount of such claims is presently unknown. The Debtor estimates
that the total amount of all Allowed Class 4 Claims will not exceed
$10,000. Each Holder of an Allowed Class 4 Claim will receive on or
before the 90th day after the Effective Date, the lesser of (i) a
Cash payment equal to 50% of its Allowed General Unsecured Claims,
if any, or (b) its Pro Rata share of a lump sum payment in the
amount of $5,000. Class 4 is an Impaired Class. Holders of Class 4
Claims are entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

The funds necessary to ensure the Reorganized Debtor's performance
under the Plan after the Effective Date will be obtained from cash
on hand, equity contributions, distributions of income from the
business operations of the Debtor's wholly-owned subsidiary
WinTech, LLC, any reserves that may be established by the Debtor;
and any other contributions or financing that the Reorganized
Debtor may obtain on or after the Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb18-12951-35.pdf

           About Virtual Communications

Virtual Communications Corporation, headquartered in Las Vegas,
Nevada, is a privately-held technology company that develops
technology solutions that enable businesses to improve their
customer interaction experience.  The company's primary product is
the ALICE ("A Live Interactive Communication Experience")
Receptionist software.  The ALICE system, provided as a software
subscription model, permits businesses to control many aspects of
handling visitors to their physical premises without the need for a
designated member of staff to be located in the entity's reception
area.  A single staff member may remotely interact with visitors to
a number of physical locations.  The company currently sells its
product to businesses and government entities in the United States,
Australia, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bermuda, Brazil, Canada, China and
New Zealand.

Virtual Communications Corporation sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 18-12951) on May
22, 2018.

In the petition signed by Michael Yoder, president and director,
the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Laurel E. Babero presides over the case.


W.W. CONSTRUCTION: Seeks to Hire Aldrich CPAS as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------------
W.W. Construction, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Oregon to employ Aldrich CPAS and
Advisors LLP, as accountant to the Debtor.

W.W. Construction requires Aldrich CPAS to:

   -- prepare all federal or state income tax returns, and any
      other reporting as required by the federal or state taxing
      authorities, or as required by the Bankruptcy Court;

   -- provide other services that might be necessary including,
      but not limited to, assistance in drafting financial
      projections necessary for Debtor to propose and confirm a
      Plan of Reorganization; and

   -- provide consulting on bankruptcy issues, including tax
      attribute reduction issues, and other issues, including
      bookkeeping consulting and general tax advice.

Aldrich CPAS will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Mike Hawkey, CPA                $425
     Tracy Allen, CPA                $375
     Philip Meadows, CPA             $250

Aldrich CPAS will be paid a retainer in the amount of $5,000.

Aldrich CPAS will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Mike Hawkey, a partner at Aldrich CPAS and Advisors LLP, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Aldrich CPAS can be reached at:

     Mike Hawkey
     ALDRICH CPAS AND ADVISORS LLP
     5665 SW Meadows Rd. Suite 200
     Lake Oswego, OR 97035
     Tel: (503) 620-4489

                    About W.W. Construction

W. W. Construction, LLC, is a family owned and operated business
founded in 1988 and is headquartered in Newport, Oregon.  Acting as
a general and sub contractor, W. W. Construction provides
excavating, site work and underground utilities for projects
located across the Northwest.

W. W. Construction filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Ore. Case
No. 18-60234) on Jan. 29, 2018.  In the petition signed by Beth
Wheeler, managing member, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million both in assets and liabilities.  The case is assigned to
Judge David W Hercher.  Douglas R. Ricks, Esq., at Vanden Bos &
Chapman, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


WESTMORELAND RESOURCE: Obtains Default Waiver Extension to July 31
------------------------------------------------------------------
Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP, its subsidiary, Oxford Mining
Company, LLC, as borrower, and the guarantors, U.S. Bank National
Association, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the
lenders entered into Waiver and Amendment No. 5 to the Financing
Agreement dated Dec. 13, 2014, among the Loan Parties, the Agents,
and the lenders on June 15, 2018.  Pursuant to the Waiver, the
Agents, the lenders and the Loan Parties agreed, among certain
other affirmative covenants, to extend the waiver of any actual or
potential Default of Event of Default that arose or may have
arisen, in each case, solely as a result or in connection with the
Loan Parties' failure under Section 7.01(a)(iii) of the Financing
Agreement to deliver to each Agent and each Lender an unqualified
audit opinion in connection with the audited financial statements
for the Fiscal Year of the Partnership and its Subsidiaries ending
Dec. 31, 2017, until the earliest of (i) 11:59 pm New York time
July 31, 2018, (ii) the occurrence of any event of default not
waived pursuant to the Waiver or (iii) an insolvency proceeding of
Westmoreland Coal Company.

                  About Westmoreland Resource

Based in Englewood, Colorado, Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP
(NYSE: WMLP) -- http://www.westmorelandMLP.com/-- is a low-cost
producer of high-value thermal coal to large electric utilities
with coal-fired power plants under long-term coal sales contracts.
The Company also markets to industrial users, and is the largest
producer of surface mined coal in Ohio.

Westmoreland Resource reported a net loss of $31.75 million on
$315.6 million of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss of $31.58 million on $349.3 million of
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018,
Westmoreland Resource had $336.15 million in total assets, $410.7
million in total liabilities and a total deficit of $74.52
million.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Denver, Colorado, the Partnership's auditor
since 2015, issued a "going concern" opinion its report on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
stating that the Partnership does not currently have liquidity or
access to additional capital sufficient to pay off its term loan
debt by its maturity date, and has stated that substantial doubt
exists about the Partnership's ability to continue as a going
concern.


WILLOW BEND: July 23 Continued Hearing on Disclosure Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Elizabeth W. Magner of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana issued an order for a continuance
hearing on the amended disclosure statement explaining Willow Bend
Ventures, LLC's Chapter 11 plan.

June 11, 2018 is the hearing on the amended disclosure statement,
and it is continued to a status conference on July 23, 2018 at 2:00
P.M. in Room B-741.

                    About Willow Bend Ventures

Edgard, Louisiana-based Willow Bend Ventures, LLC, sought Chapter
11 protection (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 17-11178) on May 9, 2017.
The Debtor hired Phillip K. Wallace, PLC, as its bankruptcy counsel
and Fletcher & Associates, LLC as its accountant.  The Debtor
tapped Robert S. Angelico, Cheryl Mollere Kornick, Jeff Birdsong,
and the Professional Law Corporation of Liskow & Lewis, as special
counsel.



WINN-DIXIE: Dist. Court Junks K&B Suit vs Caffery-Saloom, ANICO
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned K&B LOUISIANA CORPORATION, v. CAFFERY-SALOOM
RETAIL, LLC, ET AL, Civil Action No. 16-0503 (W.D. La.), Magistrate
Judge Carol B. Whitehurst granted the motions for summary judgment
filed by Caffery-Saloom Retail, LLC and American National Insurance
Company and the claims asserted by K&B against Caffery-Saloom and
ANICO are denied and dismissed with prejudice. Because K&B's claims
are dismissed, K&B's motion for summary judgment is denied as moot.
ANICO's motion for attorneys' fees is also denied.

The instant dispute arises out of an alleged co-tenancy violation
contained in a lease agreement between K&B and Caffery Center,
entered into on Jan. 23, 1995. On March 9, 2016, K&B filed suit
against Caffery-Saloom, ANICO, and Southwest Property Management,
Inc. in the 15th Judicial District Court for the Parish of
Lafayette, seeking various damages for violations of the lease
agreement. The defendants removed the matter to the Court on April
15, 2016. In the pending motions, Caffery-Saloom and ANICO seek
dismissal of the plaintiff's claims on grounds the claims are
prescribed and on grounds the lawsuit is filed against improper
parties. ANICO seeks attorneys' fees as a sanction for K&B's
failure to admit certain facts related to the prescription issue
during discovery.

Caffery-Saloom and ANICO argue K&B's claims should be dismissed for
a number of reasons, including that any claim for breach of
contract has prescribed. The Court agrees.

K&B's claims against the defendants for the return of rental
payments are subject to a ten-year prescriptive period. The
ten-year prescriptive period for the breach of a contract begins to
run on the "the date the contract is allegedly breached."

Caffery-Saloom and ANICO argue that Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
closed on June 21, 2000, and that the lease provided that the
lessor had six months to find a comparable replacement tenant to
lease the space. K&B's corporate representative testified that K&B
completed a "co-tenancy violation review project" in 2013, and as
part of that project, K&B's internal records indicate that
"Winn-Dixie closed 6/21/2000." Ergo, the defendants argue K&B's
right of action for breach of contract prescribed 10 years after
Dec. 21, 2000, which would have been December 21, 2010.

Alternatively, Caffery-Saloom and ANICO argue the record shows that
on Nov. 22, 2000, the Shopping Center property manager, Gregory
Reggie, informed all the Shopping Center tenants -- including K&B
-- that Winn-Dixie had closed and the lessor's attempts to convince
Winn-Dixie to reopen had been unsuccessful. Under these facts,
K&B's cause of action for breach of contract began to run six
months from Nov. 22, 2000, which would be May 22, 2001. The
ten-year prescriptive period would, therefore, have ended on May
22, 2011.

K&B  disputes that Winn-Dixie closed in June 2000, arguing that the
evidence in this case doesn't support such a finding, but providing
no evidence of its own to show when Winn-Dixie actually closed its
doors and ceased operations. Nevertheless, the Court finds that the
undisputed evidence supports that K&B knew or should have known of
Winn-Dixie's closure by June 2000.

It is undisputed that K&B was aware of the closure of Winn-Dixie in
the Caffery Center as of August 31, 2005. At the very latest,
therefore, K&B's cause of action for breach of contract began to
run six months from August 31, 2005, which would be the end of
February 2006. The ten-year prescriptive period would, therefore,
have ended in late February 2016. The record shows K&B sent its
demand letter to Caffery Saloom on Dec. 17, 2015, and it filed suit
on March 9, 2016, after its claim prescribed. Therefore, even if
the Court were to assume that K&B did not have notice that
Winn-Dixie ceased to operate in the Caffery Shopping Center until
August 2005, as K&B has admitted, K&B nevertheless failed to invoke
Articles 2 and 20 of the Lease within the applicable prescriptive
period, and the date that K&B filed suit was beyond the
prescriptive period.

In its motion, ANICO argues that plaintiffs should be cast in
judgment for the entirety of ANICO's attorney's fees, expenses, and
costs in defending this ongoing litigation, as well as for all
costs of these proceedings. ANICO avers that if this motion is
granted, it will submit an Affidavit which sets forth the amount of
attorney's fees and expenses incurred.

Although the Court does not condone the failure of a party to
produce responsive documents or admit facts that should plainly be
admitted based on the facts known to that party, in the instant
case, the Court concludes sanctions are not warranted. Here, the
requested fact was of no substantial importance to the Court in
determining that K&B's claims are prescribed. While the court finds
that the undisputed evidence supports that K&B knew or should have
known of Winn-Dixie's closure by June 2000, K&B's claims are still
prescribed based on the facts it did admit that it had knowledge
that Winn-Dixie closed its store in August 2005. For this reason,
the Court concludes that sanctions are not warranted.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Ruling dated May 18,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2sVxDs0 from Leagle.com.

K & B Louisiana Corp, doing business as Rite Aid, Plaintiff,
represented by McNeil James Kemmerly --
mkemmerly@leakeandersson.com -- Leake & Andersson, Anton L.
Hasenkampf -- ahasenkampf@leakeanderson.com -- Leake & Andersson &
George D. Fagan -- gfagan@leakeanderson.com -- Leake & Andersson.

Caffery-Saloom Retail L L C, Defendant, represented by Ryan O'Neil
Luminais -- rluminais@shergarner.com -- Sher Garner et al, Emily
Ellis Ross, Krebs Farley, James M. Garner, Sher Garner et al, Marie
A. Moore -- mmoore@shergarner.com -- Sher Garner et al & Thomas
Preston McAlister -- tmcalister@shergarner.com -- Sher Garner et
al.

American National Insurance Co, Defendant, represented by Patrick
J. Briney -- briney@brineyforet.com -- Briney Foret Corry.

                      About Winn-Dixie

Founded in 1925 and headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida,
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. -- http://www.winndixie.com/-- operates
roughly 480 retail grocery locations, including roughly 380
in-store pharmacies, in Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia and
Mississippi. The Company employs roughly 46,000 people.

On Feb. 21, 2005, Winn-Dixie and 23 then-existing direct and
indirect wholly owned subsidiaries filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 05-11063, transferred Apr. 14,
2005, to Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case Nos. 05-03817 through 05-03840).
Two of the then-existing wholly owned subsidiaries of Winn-Dixie
Stores, Inc. did not file petitions under Chapter 11.

When the Debtors filed for protection from their creditors, they
disclosed $2,235,557,000 in total assets and $1,870,785,000 in
total debts.  The Honorable Jerry A. Funk confirmed Winn-Dixie's
Joint Plan of Reorganization on Nov. 9, 2006.  Winn-Dixie emerged
from bankruptcy on Nov. 21, 2006.  Stephen D. Busey, Esq., at Smith
Hulsey & Busey in Jacksonville, represented the Debtors as counsel.


WORLD GLOBAL FINANCING: Examiner Hires Bast Amron as Attorney
-------------------------------------------------------------
Scott N. Brown, the examiner of World Global Financing, Inc., seeks
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Florida to employ Bast Amron LLP, as attorney to the Examiner.

On May 23, 2018, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order on Motion of
Eaglewood SPV I LP For an Order Appointing Chapter 11 Trustee or
Examiner, which, among other things, directs the Examiner to
proceed with all possible haste in conducting his investigation and
to provide the Court with a preliminary or, if possible, final
report on or before June 11, 2018 at 2:00 p.m., or to advise the
Court that he needs further time to submit such report.

The Examiner requires Bast Amron to represent the Examiner and
assist the Examiner in fulfilling his duties as examiner in the
Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Bast Amron will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Attorneys                $315 to $550
         Paraprofessionals         $85 to $240

Bast Amron will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Scott N. Brown, a partner at Bast Amron, assured the Court that the
firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Bast Amron can be reached at:

     Scott N. Brown, Esq.
     BAST AMRON LLP
     One Southeast Third Avenue, Suite 1400
     Miami, FL 33131
     Tel: (305) 379-7904
     Fax: (305) 379-7905
     E-mail: sbrown@bastamron.com

                  About World Global Financing

World Global Financing Inc. -- http://www.wgfinancing.com/-- is a
merchant cash advance provider that offers financing programs to
businesses that perform well but cannot show it with financial
statements, business owners with bad credit history and other newer
businesses.  The Company offers small business financing, bad
credit business financing, business working capital, automotive
business financing, beauty business financing, business equipment
financing, commercial truck financing, gas station financing,
healthcare business financing, heavy equipment financing,
hotel/motel financing, restaurant business financing, retail store
financing, and service business financing.  World Global Financing
is headquartered in Miami, Florida.

World Global Financing Inc., based in Miami, FL, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-15499) on May 8, 2018.  In
the petition signed by CEO Cyril Eskenazi, the Debtor estimated $10
million to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Hon.
Jay A. Cristol presides over the case. Glenn D. Moses, Esq., at
Genovese Joblove & Battista, P.A., serves as bankruptcy counsel.

On May 25, 2018, Scott N. Brown was appointed as Chapter 11
examiner in the case. The Examiner hired Bast Amron LLP as
attorney.



ZAMINDAR PROPERTIES: FBA Files Amended Objection to Plan Outline
----------------------------------------------------------------
FB Acquisition Property XVII, LLC, filed an amended objection to
the disclosure statement explaining Zamindar Properties, LLC's
small business plan.

In its amended objection, FB Acquisition complained that the
Disclosure Statement is inadequate because no information regarding
the person or entity that will be managing Debtor during the
pendency of the Plan ("the Manager") is provided.  FB Acquisition
said it cannot make an informed decision about the Manager's
ability to successfully run the Debtor's business when the
Disclosure Statement is silent about the Manager's qualifications
and the relationship of the Manager to the Debtor.

FB Acquisition added that the Debtor's Disclosure Statement is also
inadequate in that it fails to provide "a discussion of the
potential material Federal tax consequences of the plan to the
debtor, any successor to the debtor, and a hypothetical investor
typical of the holders of claims or interests in the case."

                   About Zamindar Properties

Owned by Fenix Capital LLC, Zamindar Properties, LLC, operates
commercial and residential real estate units in its business.
Zamindar owns 10 properties;
two 3-unit buildings; five duplexes and a commercial office
building a mixed-use  building and a four-unit residential
building.

Zamindar Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-23385) on Sept. 9,
2016.  In the petition signed by Joann Jenkins, president, the
Debtor estimated its assets and liabilities at $1 million to $10
million.  Zamindar Properties tapped Calaiaro Valencik as legal
counsel.  The case is assigned to Judge Carlota M. Bohm.  No
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
case.


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***