/raid1/www/Hosts/bankrupt/TCR_Public/180612.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, June 12, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 162

                            Headlines

115 PLAIN DRIVE: Seeks to Hire Michael S. Kalis as Attorney
32 COLD: Court Approves Second Amended Disclosure Statement
328 HOFFMAN LANE: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
4411 ENGLE RIDGE: Unsecureds to Get 120 Monthly Payments of $114
500 NORTH AVENUE: July 17 Plan Confirmation Hearing

54 NIPOMO: Unsecured to Get 100% from Property Sale Proceeds
5431-33 S. WABASH: Taps Benjamin Brand as Legal Counsel
5437 S. WABASH: Taps Benjamin Brand as Legal Counsel
624 STANYAN STREET: Taps Rockwell as Real Estate Broker
ABSOLUTE PAINTING II: Taps Savo Schalk as Legal Counsel

ACCURIDE CORP: S&P Affirms 'B' Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
ACHAOGEN INC: Stockholders Elected 3 Directors
ACIS CAPITAL: Trustee Hires Winstead PC as Special Counsel
AGILE THERAPEUTICS: Plans to Reduce Workforce by 30% to Cut Costs
ALERIS INT'L: Moody's Rates $400M Secured Notes Due 2023 'Caa2'

AMERICAN UNDERWRITING: Seeks to Hire GGG Partners, Appoint CRO
APB IMPORTS: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
APEX XPRESS: Examiner Seeks to Hire Mellinger Sanders as Attorney
APEX XPRESS: Examiner Seeks to Hire Withum Smith as Accountant
ARCON PROPERTIES: CBC Objects to Proposed Amended Disclosures

ARMONK SNACK: Not Tenant on Lease Agreement with FSNR, RPR
ATLANTA GROTNES: Unsecureds to Get 100% Under Chapter 11 Plan
AUSTLEN BABY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
AUTO MASTERS: Seeks to Hire Tamarez CPA as Accountant
B&P DEVELOPMENT: Seeks to Hire Barron & Newburger as Counsel

B.J.'S DRILL: Hires Patten, Peterman, Bekkedahl & Green as Counsel
BEAVER-VISITEC INT'L: Moody's Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms CFR
BELLA BAG LLC: Seeks to Hire Jones & Walden as Counsel
BEST ROAD VIEW: Hires Better Homes as Real Estate Broker
BIOSTAGE INC: Two Directors Quit From Board

BISHOP GORMAN: JATCO Amended Plan Proposes Lease of Real Property
BLUE EAGLE FARMING: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
BNEVMA LLC: July 25 Approval Hearing on Disclosure Statement
BOOTIQUE TRENDS: May Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
BPS US HOLDINGS: Court Disallows S. Gasowski, et al.'s Claims

BRACHA CAB CORP: Seeks to Hire Fred Roth as Accountant
BRONX MIRACLE GOSPEL: Bankr. Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Case
BUNGALOW 3 NYC: Seeks to Hire Pick & Zabicki as Counsel
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Earl, Whitebox Must Produce Certain Docs.
CC LLC: Seeks to Hire DSH Hotel as Real Estate Broker

CCS ONCOLOGY: Judge Signs 9th Emergency Cash Collateral Order
CELESTICA INC: Moody's Assigns Ba2 CFR & Rates $800MM Loans Ba1
CELESTICA INC: S&P Affirms 'BB' LT CCR on Proposed Refinancing
CENVEO INC: Examiner Finds Potential Claims Against Insiders
CENVEO INC: July 23 Plan Confirmation Hearing

CHANA TAUB: Lawyer Not Entitled to Charging Lien, Court Rules
CHARLOTTE RUSSE: Moody's Assigns Caa1 CFR & Rates $90MM Loan Caa1
CK ASSISTED: Unsecureds to Get $20K Plus Interest at 3% Per Annum
CLINICA SANTA ROSA: July 19 Disclosure Statement Hearing
COBRA WELL: Taps Markus Williams as Legal Counsel

COLORADO LONESOME: Taps Brokerage Real Estate as Real Estate Broker
COMMUNITY HEALTH: Extends Exchange Offers Expiration Until June 19
COMPREHENSIVE CANCER: Trustee Hires Chiampou Travis as Accountant
COMPREHENSIVE CANCER: Trustee Hires Zdarsky Sawicki as Counsel
CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Extends Early Consent Deadline to June 12

COURTSIDE CONDOMINIUMS: Hires Holland & Hart LLP as Counsel
CPI CARD: Lane Dubin Will Get $200,000 Retention Bonus
CS MINING: Bankr. Ct. Lacks Jurisdiction to Grant TMC, NAC Request
CTON CORPORATION: Case Summary & 13 Unsecured Creditors
CYCLONE CATTLE: Hires Ed Spencer Real Estate as Real Estate Agent

DAVID MULLANEY: Bid to Dismiss BOA, CMI 1st Counterclaim Junked
DENT DEPOT: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% Over 120 Months
DPW HOLDINGS: Sets Goals for the Next 10 Years
EARTH PRIDE: Finalizing Loan Agreement with Big Shoulder
EASTMAN KODAK: S&P Cuts Corp. Credit Rating to 'CCC', Outlook Neg.

ECS REFINING: Cash Collateral Use Authorized on Final Basis
EMERALD GRANDE: Bankruptcy Case Remains in Chapter 11, Ct. Rules
EMMANUEL HEALTH: Hires Margaret Maxwell McClure as Counsel
EPICENTER PARTNERS: Ct. Affirms Exclusion of Late Fees in CPF Claim
EVO PAYMENTS: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Cuts 1st Lien Loan to B2

FAIRMOUNT SANTROL: Fitch Withdraws 'B-' LT IDR Amid Company Merger
FHH PROPERTIES: Trustee Hires Valbridge Property as Appraiser
FLORENCE HOSPITAL: PCO Hires Allen Barnes as Counsel
FLORENCE HOSPITAL: PCO Hires Seelig Cussigh as Consultant
FORASTERO INC: Taps Daniel Burdak as Real Estate Broker

FORASTERO INC: Taps Reiner & Reiner as Special Counsel
FREELINC TECHNOLOGIES: Taps American Legal Claims as Claims Agent
FURNITURE FACTORY: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral Until June 30
FUTURE DIE CAST: Seeks to Hire Steinberg Shapiro as Attorney
GARCES RESTAURANT: Taps Omni Management as Claims Agent

GARDENS REGIONAL: Order Denying DHCS Administrative Claim Upheld
GENTIVA HEALTH: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
GOLF CARS: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% Over 120 Months
GRIER BROS: Unsecureds to be Paid $2K in Quarterly Distributions
H N HINCKLEY: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Until June 21

HARDES HOLDING: Unsecureds to Get 100% with 3% Interest Under Plan
HAWAIIAN SPRINGS: Asks Court to Approve Proposed Plan Outline
HFOTCO LLC: S&P Assigns 'BB-' Rating to New Secured Term Loan
HOUSTON BLUEBONNET: Taps Cokinos Young as Special Counsel
HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Incurs $9.8 Million Net Loss in Q2

IDEARC INC: Verizon Can Recover Defense Costs in Spin-Off Suits
INDUSTRIAL STEEL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
IWORLD OF TRAVEL: Seeks to Hire Gamberg & Abrams as Counsel
J3 GRADING: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
JACKSON MASONRY: Bid for Disbursement of Supersedeas Bond Tossed

JC FITS: Judge Approves Second Cash Collateral Stipulation
JM HOLDING GROUP: Hires Silverman Shin as Special Counsel
JOLIVETTE HAULING: Seeks to Hire Compeer Financial as Accountant
KANZLER LANDSCAPE: To Pay Unsecureds $8,513 Monthly Over 8 Years
KELLER OUTDOOR: Hires Latham Shuker as Counsel

KENTUCKY HOMECARE: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR, Outlook Stable
KINDRED HEALTHCARE: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
KINDRED HEALTHCARE: S&P Assigns 'B+' CCR, Outlook Stable
L S R INC: Hires John Empson AC as Accountant
LADDCO LLC: July 6 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing

LARGO RESOURCES: S&P Assigns B- Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
LAUNCH SPORT PERFORMANCE: Hires Cohen Baldinger as Counsel
LEHMAN BROTHERS INT'L: Ch. 15 Recognition Hearing Set for June 19
LINCOLN PAPER: Claims in Committee Suits v Fisher, et al., Narrowed
LONG BLOCKCHAIN: Nasdaq Files Form 25 with the SEC

MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES: Moody's Cuts CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
MEDONE HEALTHCARE: Hearing on Plan Outline Set for July 17
MESA OIL: Court Confirms Amended Plan of Reorganization
MLRG INC: Taps Larry Strauss as Accountant
MODERN VIDEOFILM: Taps Winthrop Couchot as Insolvency Counsel

MOHAVE AGRARIAN: Bid to Enforce Confirmed Chapter 11 Plan Nixed
MONEYONMOBILE INC: Extends Rights Offering Period to June 22
NATIONAL CINEMEDIA: Moody's Rates Extended Sec. Loans 'Ba3'
NATIONAL TRUCK: Court Confirms Joint Amended Reorganization Plan
NAVILLUS TILE: Fee Examiner Taps Lori Lapin Jones as Attorney

NAVILLUS TILE: Unknown Recovery for Unsecured Creditors Under Plan
NEIMAN MARCUS: Reports Third Quarter Net Loss of $19.9 Million
NEW HOPE: CMS Plan Proposes 20%-100% Return for Unsecureds
NEW MACH GEN: Expects to Emerge from Chapter 11 in 2nd Half 2018
NEW MACH GEN: Riverstone's Talen to Keep 2 of 3 Plants

NEW MACH GEN: Unsecured Creditors to Get 100% in Prepack Plan
NICHOLS BROTHERS: Hires McDonald & Metcalf LLP as Counsel
NINE WEST HOLDINGS: Claims Bar Date Set for June 29
NINE WEST: Authentic Brands' $350 Million Bid Wins Auction
NOVAN INC: Stockholders Elected 3 Directors

NYS ENERGY AUDITS: Hires Wisdom Professional as Accountant
OAKRIDGE HOLDINGS: Unsecureds to Receive $50K in Two Payments
PACKARD SQUARE: Dist. Ct. Upholds Ruling Dismissing Bankruptcy Case
PACKARD SQUARE: SSSL, BFAI Lack Standing to File Bankruptcy Appeal
PATRIOT NATIONAL: Court Junks B&B, J. Corbett Bid to Stay TTSL Suit

PEGASUS VIP: Taps Jesse Aguinaga as Legal Counsel
POST OAK REALTY: Jones Lang to Auction 100% LLC Interests
PREMIER PCS: Unsecureds to Get 60% to 100% in Installment Payments
PRO-SEC CORP: Hearing on Plan, Disclosures Set for July 5
QUADRANT 4: Files Chapter 11 Joint Plan of Liquidation

RANDOLPH AND RANDOLPH: Taps David McAlister as Special Counsel
REGIONAL EVANGELICAL: Hires Hinkle Law Firm LLC as Counsel
RELATIVITY MEDIA: Metz' Claim Against Kavanaugh Without Merit
RENNOVA HEALTH: Completes Purchase of 85-Bed Hospital in Tennessee
REO HOLDINGS: Contempt Conviction Against Owner Affirmed

ROBERT T. WINZINGER: Taps Taylor and Keyser as Special Counsel
ROCKFORT BUILDERS: Court Junks IIG Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction
ROYAL T ENERGY: Unsecureds to Recover 25% of Allowed Claims
SCHLETTER INC: District Court Stays B. Curry, et al., Lawsuit
SECOND PHOENIX: Taps Atty. David Stich as Special Counsel

SEMLER SCIENTIFIC: CEO Murphy-Chutorian Has 12.4% Stake
SEMLER SCIENTIFIC: William Chang Has 23.5% Stake as of April 20
SKY-SCAN INC: New Hampshire Objects to Plan Outline
SOAR INTO YOUR DESTINY: Has Authority to Use Cash Collateral
SPOKANE COIN: Seeks Conditional Approval of Plan Outline

STANDARD MEDIA: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'B' CCR, Outlook Stable
STONE CONNECTION: Unsecureds to Recoup 35% Paid in 14 Installments
TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE: Fitch Cuts LT Issuer Default Rating to BB-
TIAN RECLAMATION: Taps Nichols Equipment as Appraiser
TINTRI INC: Insight Venture Entities Cease to be Shareholders

TOYS R US: Court Approves Assignment of Lease to Raymours
TOYS R US: Ombudsman Taps Hirschler Fleischer as Legal Counsel
TRAILER VAN: New Plan Discloses Settlement Agreement with J. Torres
TRIBUNE COMPANY: J. Cazoneri's Bid to Reopen Appeals Nixed
TRINITY AFFORDABLE: S&P Lowers Ratings on 2015 Housing Bonds to BB-

VIASAT INC: Egan-Jones Lowers Sr. Unsecured Ratings to B
W.P.I.P. INC: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
WEST POINT MARKET: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
WILLBROS GROUP: Primoris Services Holds 100% Stake as of June 1
X-TREME BULLETS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

YBRANT MEDIA: DGHC Appointed as Receiver for Lycos' 56% Share
ZALER POP: Pennsylvania Objects to Plan Confirmation
[*] Beard Group 25th Annual Distressed Investing Conference Nov. 26
[*] BRG Honored for Advising on Cross-Border Deal of the Year
[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet


                            *********

115 PLAIN DRIVE: Seeks to Hire Michael S. Kalis as Attorney
-----------------------------------------------------------
115 Plain Drive LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Massachusetts to employ Michael S. Kalis, Esq.,
as attorney to the Debtor.

115 Plain Drive requires Michael S. Kalis to:

   (a) give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers,
       duties and responsibilities as Debtor-in-Possession in the
       continued operation of its business;

   (b) draft legal instruments necessary to the continued
       operation of the Debtor, and to assist the Debtor in
       establishing lines of credit with banks, and/or suppliers;

   (c) explain the legal position of creditors during the period
       of administration of the Debtor's estate;

   (d) attend with and advise the Debtor on hearings before the
       U.S. Trustee, and the Bankruptcy Court;

   (e) negotiate with and if necessary to litigate with the
       Internal Revenue Service and the Commonwealth of
       Massachusetts relative to the amounts due and payment of
       taxes owed;

   (f) draft and give legal advice relating to the filing and
       confirmation of the Debtor's reorganization plan;

   (g) perform all other services for the Debtor which may be
       necessary herein, and it is necessary for your applicant
       to employ an attorney for such professional services.

Michael S. Kalis will be paid at the hourly rate of $360.  The firm
will be paid a retainer in the amount of $12,500.  It will also be
reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael S. Kalis, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

Michael S. Kalis can be reached at:

     Michael S. Kalis, Esq.
     632 High Street
     Dedham MA 02026
     Tel: (781) 461-0030

                    About 115 Plain Drive

115 Plain Drive LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 18-11978) on May 28, 2018, estimating under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is represented
by Michael S. Kalis, Esq.



32 COLD: Court Approves Second Amended Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ernest M. Robles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California issued an order approving 32 Cold, LLC's
second amended disclosure statement in support of its proposed plan
of reorganization.

                      About 32 Cold, LLC

32 Cold, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 16-24890) on November 9, 2016.  The Hon. Ernest M.
Robles presides over the case.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities. The petition
was signed by Ashlee Smith, CFO.



328 HOFFMAN LANE: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
------------------------------------------------------
328 Hoffman Lane LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York a disclosure statement for its chapter
11 plan of liquidation, dated May 29, 2018, which provides for the
Sale of the Real Property by private sale or by auction, subject to
approval by the Bankruptcy Court.

Class 3 under the plan consists of the allowed Second Mortgagee
Claim. Upon a determination of the Allowed Amount of a Class 3
Claim by the Bankruptcy Court or by agreement between such Holder
and the Debtor, the Allowed Class 3 Claim will be paid in full, in
Cash. If the Allowed amount of such Class 3 Claim has been fixed as
of the closing of the Sale, such Allowed Class 3 Claim will be paid
in full, in Cash at the closing of the Sale. If the Allowed amount
of such Class 3 Claim is fixed after the closing of the Sale, such
Allowed Class 3 Claim will be paid in full, in Cash, within 20 days
of becoming an Allowed Claim.

Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims in Class 4 will receive
payment in full plus interest at the Federal judgment rate.

The Debtor believes that the proceeds of the Sale will be
sufficient to make a 100% distribution to all Holders of Claims and
Equity Interests.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb8-18-71322-20.pdf

                    About 328 Hoffman Lane

328 Hoffman Lane LLC lists its business as single asset real estate
(as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

328 Hoffman Lane sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-71322) on Feb. 28,
2018.  In the petition signed by Joe Tuscano, managing member, the
Debtor estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge Louis A. Scarcella
presides over the case.  Forchelli Deegan Terrana LLP is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


4411 ENGLE RIDGE: Unsecureds to Get 120 Monthly Payments of $114
----------------------------------------------------------------
4411 Engle Ridge Drive, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan, a combined plan and
disclosure statement, that proposes to

Under the Plan, the Debtor proposes to make monthly payments of
$2,195.38 to the Debtor's first secured mortgage creditor, Old
National Bank, for a period of 120 months; 54 monthly payments of
$250.42 real property tax creditor Allen County, Indiana; and 120
monthly payments of $114 to the class of unsecured creditors
pro-rata.

The funds for implementing and carrying out the Plan will be
provided by the Debtor's continued rental of the premises commonly
known as 4411 Engle Ridge Drive, Wayne, Indiana.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb18-41983-60.pdf

                   About 4411 Engle Ridge Drive

4411 Engle Ridge Drive, LLC, is a single asset real estate case,
with its only asset being the real property and improvements
commonly known as 4411 Engle Ridge Drive, Fort Wayne, Indiana.  It
is a Michigan corporation formed on Aug. 20, 2013.

4411 Engle Ridge Drive filed a Chapter 11 voluntary petition
(Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-41983) on Feb. 16, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Jeffrey Wilkerson, manager, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The Hon. Phillip J.
Shefferly is assigned to the case.


500 NORTH AVENUE: July 17 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------------
Judge Ann M. Nevins of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Connecticut approved 500 North Avenue, LLC's ninth amended
disclosure statement to accompany its plan of reorganization dated
May 16, 2018.

July 3, 2018 is fixed as the last day for returning Written ballots
of acceptance or rejection of the Plan.

July 17, 2018 at 10:00 am, continuing on July 19, 2018, and other
dates as necessary, are fixed as the hearing dates to consider
Confirmation of the Chapter 11 Plan, at 157 Church Street, 18th
Floor, Courtroom, New Haven, Connecticut.

Written objections to the Plan must be filed with the court no
later than July 3, 2018.

The Debtor, in its Ninth Amended Disclosure Statement, disclosed
that a stipulation approved by the Court on April 23, 2018, granted
relief from stay to Moutinho, Trustee to allow him to pursue
pending foreclosure actions relating to the North Avenue Property,
the Barnum Avenue Property and the Fifth Avenue Property. The
Stipulated Order further provides that Moutinho, Trustee will waive
any further claims against the Debtor and this estate.  As a result
of the entry of the Stipulated Order, the only remaining real
properties to be treated under the Plan are the James Farm Road
Property and the Main Street Parcel, a 4,000-square foot plot of
land. The Company believes title to the Main Street Parcel is in
the name of 3044 Main, LLC, a predecessor to the Company. The
current value of this plot of land is unknown.  The Debtor is
currently analyzing the Main Street Parcel for its sale potential
and, if possible, will seek to sell the Main Street Parcel pursuant
to the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Ninth Amended Disclosure Statement:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb14-31094-632.pdf

                     About 500 North Avenue

500 North Avenue, LLC, and Long Brook Station, LLC, filed Chapter
11 petitions (Bankr. D. Conn. Case Nos. 14-31094 and 14-31095) on
June 6, 2014.  

In the petitions signed by Joseph Regensburger, member, 500 North
Avenue estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities; and Long Brook Station
estimated $500,000 to $1 million in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Julie A. Manning.

Douglas S. Skalka, Esq., at Neubert, Pepe, and Monteith, P.C., is
the Debtors' counsel.  DeLibro Realty Group, LLC, was appointed as
broker.


54 NIPOMO: Unsecured to Get 100% from Property Sale Proceeds
------------------------------------------------------------
54 Nipomo Partners, Inc, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of California a proposed combined plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement, which propose that the
plan to constitute as new contractual obligations that replace the
Debtor's pre-confirmation debts.

Under the Plan, allowed claims of general unsecured creditors will
receive 100% of their allowed claim from the proceeds of sale of
the Debtor's real property or the refinance of the property. A sale
or refinance will be completed within six (6) months of the
Effective Date of the Plan.

The Debtor is a limited liability company. The Debtor's sole asset
is a parcel of land located in Nipomo, California. The land
consists of a single parcel that is approximately 5 acres in size.
The land is currently undeveloped except for one existing cement
pad, electrical and water service to the land. The Debtor financed
its acquisition of the land by borrowing the sum of $1,500,000 from
Union Home Loan, Inc.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb18-40282-32.pdf

                    About 54 Nipomo Partners

54 Nipomo Partners, LLC, listed its business as single asset real
estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)) whose principal
assets are located at 170 South Frontage Road Nipomo, California.

54 Nipomo Partners sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 18-40282) on Feb. 1,
2018.  In the petition signed by Robert Marinai, general manager,
the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10
million.  Judge Charles Novack presides over the case.  Kornfield,
Nyberg, Bendes, Kuhner & Little, P.C. is the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


5431-33 S. WABASH: Taps Benjamin Brand as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
5431-33 S. Wabash LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois to hire Benjamin Brand LLP as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; examine and resolve
claims; assist in the preparation and implementation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

J. Kevin Benjamin, Esq., and Theresa Benjamin, Esq., the attorneys
who will be handling the case, charge $425 per hour and $395 per
hour, respectively.  Paraprofessionals charge an hourly fee of
$125.

Prior to the petition date, Benjamin Brand received from the Debtor
a retainer of $2,000, plus the filing fee of $1,717.

Mr. Benjamin disclosed in a court filing that he and his firm are
"disinterested persons" as defined in Section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     J. Kevin Benjamin, Esq.
     Theresa S. Benjamin, Esq.
     Benjamin Brand LLP
     1016 West Jackson Blvd.
     Chicago, IL 60607-2914
     Phone: (312) 853-3100  
     E-mail: attorneys@benjaminlaw.com

                   About 5431-33 S. Wabash LLC

5431-33 S. Wabash LLC owns a real property, which is its principal
asset, located at 5431-33 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois.  5431-33 S.
Wabash sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-12463) on April 27, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Dylan Reeves, managing member, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of less
than $500,000.  Judge Janet S. Baer presides over the case.


5437 S. WABASH: Taps Benjamin Brand as Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
5437 S. Wabash LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois to hire Benjamin Brand LLP as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; examine and resolve
claims; assist in the preparation and implementation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

J. Kevin Benjamin, Esq., and Theresa Benjamin, Esq., the attorneys
who will be handling the case, charge $425 per hour and $395 per
hour, respectively.  Paraprofessionals charge an hourly fee of
$125.

Prior to the petition date, Benjamin Brand received from the Debtor
a retainer of $2,000, plus the filing fee of $1,717.

Mr. Benjamin disclosed in a court filing that he and his firm are
"disinterested persons" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     J. Kevin Benjamin, Esq.
     Theresa S. Benjamin, Esq.
     Benjamin Brand LLP
     1016 West Jackson Blvd.
     Chicago, IL 60607-2914
     Phone: (312) 853-3100  
     E-mail: attorneys@benjaminlaw.com

                     About 5437 S. Wabash LLC

5437 S. Wabash LLC owns a real property, which is its principal
asset, located at 5437 S. Wabash, Chicago, Illinois.

5437 S. Wabash sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 18-12476) on April 27, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Dylan Reeves, managing member, the Debtor
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of less
than $500,000.

Judge Janet S. Baer presides over the case.


624 STANYAN STREET: Taps Rockwell as Real Estate Broker
-------------------------------------------------------
624 Stanyan Street, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of California to employ Rockwell
Properties, Inc., as real estate to the Debtor.

624 Stanyan Street requires Rockwell to to assist the Debtor in
obtaining tenants for the real property located at 1215 Fell
Street, San Francisco, California.

Rockwell will be paid a commission of 5% of the lease price.

Mark G. Kaplan, member of Rockwell Properties, Inc., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Rockwell can be reached at:

     Mark G. Kaplan
     ROCKWELL PROPERTIES, INC.
     2489 Mission Street, 2nd Floor, Suite 30
     San Francisco, CA 94110
     Tel: (415) 398-2400
     E-mail: mark@rockwellproperties.com

                    About 624 Stanyan Street

624 Stanyan Street, LLC, based in San Francisco, Calif., filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Calif. Case No. 16-30965) on Sept.
1, 2016.  In the petition signed by Larry Nasey, its manager, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  

The Hon. Dennis Montali presides over the case.  

At the onset of the case, 624 Stanyan Street hired St. James
Law,P.C. as counsel. It later replaced the firm with Macdonald
Fernandez LLP as new legal counsel.

On Nov. 16, 2016, the Debtor filed a combined disclosure statement
and Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.


ABSOLUTE PAINTING II: Taps Savo Schalk as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Absolute Painting II, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Jersey to hire Savo, Schalk,
Gillespie, O'Grodnick & Fisher, P.A., as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

The Debtor has agreed to pay Savo Schalk a retainer in the sum of
$7,000 for its services.

John Bracaglia, Jr., Esq., at Savo Schalk, disclosed in a court
filing that he and his firm are "disinterested" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     John F. Bracaglia, Jr., Esq.
     Savo, Schalk, Gillespie
     O'Grodnick & Fisher, P.A.
     77 North Bridge Street
     Somerville, NJ 08876
     Tel: 908-526-0707
     Fax: 908-725-8483
     E-mail: brokaw@centraljerseylaw.com

                 About Absolute Painting II

Absolute Painting II, Inc. -- http://www.absolutepainting.com/--
is a painting contractor in Hillsborough, New Jersey.  The company
specializes in high-density mid-rise and high-rise market with
experience in condo, townhouse and age-restricted & low-income
communities.  It offers interior home painting services, pavement
marking services, exterior home painting services, building
painting services and wall coverings.

Absolute Painting II sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 18-20774) on May 29, 2018.
In the petition signed by Sean Gibson, president, the Debtor
disclosed $112,776 in assets and $1.14 million in liabilities.  

Judge Kathryn C. Ferguson presides over the case.


ACCURIDE CORP: S&P Affirms 'B' Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'B' corporate credit rating on
Accuride Corp. The outlook remains stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we affirmed our 'B' issue-level rating
on the company's secured term loan due November 2023. The '3'
recovery rating remains unchanged, indicating our expectation for
meaningful recovery (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) in the event
of a payment default."

The affirmation follows Accuride's announcement that it has
completed its acquisition of mefro wheels GmbH, a leading European
provider of steel wheels. S&P said, "We believe this transaction
fits with the strategic growth and diversification initiatives that
Accuride's management has previously laid out. The acquisition has
improved our view of the company's business risk profile because it
has increased Accuride's scale and geographic diversity. However,
this improvement is offset by the change in our view of the
company's financial risk as we now expect its adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA to remain above 5x and its free operating cash flow
to be slightly negative during fiscal year 2018. Therefore, we have
revised our assessment of the company's financial risk profile to
highly leveraged."

S&P said, "The stable outlook on Accuride reflects our expectation
that, pro forma for the acquisition of mefro, the company's debt
leverage will remain in line with our expectations for the current
rating with debt-to-EBITDA of more than 5x. We believe that this
acquisition will provide the company with incremental, diversified
revenue growth as it continues to execute on its global expansion
initiatives. In addition, we anticipate that the company will
benefit from increased class 8 commercial vehicle production
throughout 2018 and stable demand in the class 5-7 markets, which
should provide it with the opportunity to modestly improve its
credit metrics over our forecast period.

"Although unlikely over the next year, we could raise our ratings
on Accuride if the company maintains adjusted debt leverage of
comfortably below 5x and a FOCF-to-debt ratio approaching 10%. We
would also need to be confident that the company's financial
sponsor is committed to sustaining such credit measures. This could
occur if Accuride successfully integrates mefro and further
improves its profitability on strong demand in its end markets.

"We could lower our ratings on Accuride over the next 12 months if
the company's debt-to-EBITDA approaches 6.5x or its FOCF-to-debt
ratio remains negative on a sustained basis. This could occur if
Accuride experiences key missteps while integrating its recent
acquisitions or if the company takes on a more aggressive financial
policy that includes additional debt-financed acquisitions.
Alternatively, we could lower our ratings on the company if its
EBITDA margins meaningfully deteriorate because of elevated
material costs or increased pricing pressure."


ACHAOGEN INC: Stockholders Elected 3 Directors
----------------------------------------------
Achaogen, Inc., held its annual meeting of stockholders on June 5,
2018, at which the stockholders:

   (a) elected Karen Bernstein, Ph.D., Michael Fischbach, Ph.D.
       and John W. Smither as directors to hold office until the
       2021 annual meeting of stockholders or until their
       successors are elected;

   (b) approved, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the
       compensation of the Company's named executive officers as
       disclosed in the Proxy Statement;

   (c) indicated, on an advisory, non-binding basis, the preferred
       yearly frequency of future advisory votes on the
       compensation of the Company's named executive officers; and

   (d) ratified the selection, by the Audit Committee of the
       Company's board of directors, of Ernst & Young LLP as the
       Company's independent registered public accounting firm for

       the Company's fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2018:

Consistent with the recommendation of the Company's board of
directors, a majority of the shares represented in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote voted, on an
advisory basis, in favor of conducting non-binding advisory votes
on compensation for the Company's named executive officers every
year, and the Company has determined to hold non-binding, advisory
votes on compensation for the Company's named executive officers
every year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of
advisory votes on executive compensation, which is expected to
occur no later than the Company's 2024 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.

                      About Achaogen, Inc.

South San Francisco, California-based Achaogen, Inc. --
http://www.achaogen.com/-- is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical
company committed to the discovery, development, and
commercialization of novel antibacterials to treat multi-drug
resistant gram-negative infections.  The Company is developing
plazomicin, its lead product candidate, for the treatment of
serious bacterial infections due to MDR Enterobacteriaceae,
including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.  In 2013, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention identified CRE as a
"nightmare bacteria" and an immediate public health threat that
requires "urgent and aggressive action."

Achaogen incurred a net loss of $125.6 million in 2017, a net loss
of $71.22 million in 2016 and a net loss of $27.09 million in 2015.
As of March 31, 2018, Achaogen had $183.10 million in total
assets, $70.01 million in total liabilities, $10 million in
contingently redeemable common stock and $103.09 million in total
stockholders' equity.


ACIS CAPITAL: Trustee Hires Winstead PC as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Robin Phelan, the Chapter 11 trustee of Acis Capital Management,
L.P., and its-debtor affiliates, seek authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas to employ
Winstead PC, as special counsel to the Trustee.

The Trustee requires Winstead PC to provide legal services to the
Trustee for matters specifically involving the:

   a) management, liquidation, disposition, and monetization of
      the CLO assets;

   b) Investment Advisers Act;

   c) operation of the portfolio management agreements and the
      indentures, issues arising therefrom, and, specifically
      including, litigation related thereto or arising therefrom;
      and

   d) certain other litigation matters related to or arising in
      these Cases, as requested by the Trustee.

Winstead PC will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Shareholders         $785
     Associates           $485
     Paralegals           $290

Winstead PC will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Rakhee V. Patel, a partner at Winstead PC, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Winstead PC can be reached at:

     Rakhee V. Patel, Esq.
     WINSTEAD PC
     2728 N. Harwood Street, Suite 500
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Tel: (214) 745-5400
     Fax: (214) 745-5390

                  About Acis Capital Management

On Jan. 30, 2018, Joshua N. Terry, as petitioning creditor, filed
an involuntary petition against Acis Capital Management, L.P.,
thereby initiating the Acis LP bankruptcy case.  Mr. Terry, as
petitioning creditor, also filed an involuntary petition against
Acis Capital Management GP, thereby initiating the Acis GP
bankruptcy case.

On April 13, 2018, after six days of testimony and argument, the
Bankruptcy Court entered its findings of fact and conclusions of
law in support of orders for relief on the involuntary bankruptcy
petitions.

Also on April 13, 2018, Diane Reed was appointed as interim Chapter
7 trustee for the Debtors' bankruptcy estates.  On April 18, 2018,
the Court entered its order directing that the Cases be jointly
administered under Case No. 18-30264.

On May 4, 2018, the Chapter 7 Trustee filed a motion to convert the
cases to Chapter 11.  

On May 11, 2018, the Court entered an order granting the Conversion
Motion.

On May 14, 2018, the United States Trustee appointed Robin Phelan
as Chapter 11 trustee of the Debtors.

Robin Phelan, the Ch. 11 Trustee of the Debtors, hired Forshey &
Prostok, LLP as counsel, and Winstead PC as special counsel.



AGILE THERAPEUTICS: Plans to Reduce Workforce by 30% to Cut Costs
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Agile Therapeutics, Inc., announced several key corporate updates:

  * Formal dispute resolution request has been submitted to the
    FDA regarding Twirla (levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol
    transdermal system), its lead product candidate

  * Reducing workforce by approximately 30% and reducing other
    planned expenses

  * Reductions in workforce and expenses expected to allow
    existing cash to fund operations into the second quarter of
    2019

Agile has submitted a formal dispute resolution request (FDRR) with
the FDA for Twirla (AG200-15), the Company's investigational
low-dose, non-daily, combination hormonal contraceptive patch.  The
dispute pertains to the determination from the FDA's reviewing
Division of Bone, Reproductive and Urologic Products (DBRUP), that
concerns surrounding the in vivo adhesion properties of Twirla
prevent its approval and cannot be addressed through the Company's
proposed patient compliance programs.

The Company anticipates that its FDRR will be reviewed by the
Office of Drug Evaluation III (ODEIII) and has requested a meeting
with the Office Director, which, according to FDA's guidance,
should occur within thirty days of the request.  After the meeting,
the Director should provide a decision within thirty days.

The formal dispute resolution process exists to encourage open,
prompt discussion of scientific and procedural disputes that arise
during drug development, new drug review, and post-marketing
oversight processes of the FDA.  By submitting its FDRR, the
Company is availing itself of the FDA's established appeal process
whereby disagreements with conclusions reached by a reviewing
Division within the FDA are reviewed above the Division level.
Through this process the Company has the ability to escalate its
appeal to additional levels of FDA management, if necessary.

"Twirla's adhesion profile was assessed in the context of a large
Phase 3 trial, the objective of which was to demonstrate safety and
efficacy as the basis for approval of the product.  We continue to
believe the objectives of this trial were met, and that there is no
evidence that in vivo adhesion impacted the clinical outcomes of
the trial.  On this basis, we believe the in vivo adhesion data are
adequate to support approval without the need for product
reformulation or additional work.  We have also developed multiple
innovative approaches to patient compliance that we believe can
further support or enhance the appropriate use of Twirla if it is
approved," said Al Altomari, chairman and chief executive officer,
Agile Therapeutics.  "We disagree with the FDA's conclusions on the
adhesion of Twirla and look forward to having the opportunity to
engage with the Office of Drug Evaluation III on these issues."

The Company also announced a reduction in its workforce, which will
result in the elimination of the positions of several employees
primarily from the Company's commercial and clinical teams,
representing approximately thirty percent of its employees. This
workforce reduction, along with other reductions in its planned
operating expenses, is designed to reduce operating expenses and
preserve cash while the Company pursues formal dispute resolution.
The Company now expects that its cash and cash equivalents as of
March 31, 2018, will be sufficient to meet its operating
requirements into the second quarter of 2019.

Mr. Altomari continued, "Due to the ongoing regulatory process with
Twirla and our need to fund the formal dispute resolution process,
we made the difficult decision to reduce our workforce.  I would
like to personally express my appreciation to each of the employees
impacted by this decision for their commitment and contributions to
Agile.  We are also grateful to those members of our team that will
continue to seek the approval of Twirla."


                        About Agile Therapeutics

Agile Therapeutics, headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey, is a
forward-thinking women's healthcare company dedicated to fulfilling
the unmet health needs of today's women.  The Company's product
candidates are designed to provide women with contraceptive options
that offer freedom from taking a daily pill, without committing to
a longer-acting method.  Its lead product candidate, Twirla,
(ethinyl estradiol and levonorgestrel transdermal system), also
known as AG200-15, is a once-weekly prescription contraceptive
patch that has completed Phase 3 trials.  Twirla is based on
Agile's proprietary transdermal patch technology, called
Skinfusion, which is designed to provide advantages over currently
available patches and is intended to optimize patch adhesion and
patient wearability.  For more information, please visit the
company website at www.agiletherapeutics.com.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Ernst &
Young LLP, the Company's auditor since 2010, on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations, has experienced delays in the
approval of its product candidate and has stated that substantial
doubt exists about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.

Agile reported a net loss of $28.30 million in 2017, a net loss of
$28.74 million in 2016 and a net loss of $30.33 million in 2015.
As of March 31, 2018, Agile had $42.92 million in total assets,
$12.31 million in total current liabilities and $30.61 million in
total stockholders' equity.


ALERIS INT'L: Moody's Rates $400M Secured Notes Due 2023 'Caa2'
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Caa2 rating to the new $400
million senior secured junior priority notes due 2023 of Aleris
International Inc. All the other ratings are unchanged. The
speculative grade liquidity rating was unchanged at SGL-3. The
outlook is stable.

Proceeds of the notes, together with $1.1 billion from a new senior
secured 1st lien term loan, will be used to repay the existing
7.875% senior unsecured notes due 2020 and the 9.5% senior secured
notes due 2021. The repayment of the notes is conditional upon the
new financings being completed.

Assignments:

Issuer: Aleris International Inc.

Senior Secured 2nd Lien Notes, Assigned Caa2 (LGD5)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B3 CFR considers the company's high leverage, weak debt
protection metrics and negative free cash flow over the last number
of years. However, the rating considers the significant investments
made at Lewisport ($425MM project cost) to produce automotive body
sheet, which investment was supported by firm offtake contracts and
the commencement of commercial shipments, which will ramp up over
the course of 2018. The CALP 1 (continuous annealing line with
pre-treatment) is completed and ramping up commercial production
while the CALP 2 line is being commissioned. Also considered is the
company's strong position in the aerospace market and continued
winning of new contracts such as recently announced with Bombardier
and Embraer. While the aerospace segment saw some squeezing in 2017
on supply chain destocking, fundamentals for the industry remain
strong and backlogs high.

The rating also considers Aleris' strong market position,
end-market diversification and value added capabilities,
particularly in aerospace and automotive products, as well as its
long-term customer relationships and adequate liquidity.

The stable outlook reflects the view that metrics will show
improving trends over the next 12 -- 18 months on stronger market
fundamentals and an improving product mix profile as the ABS
production ramps up.

Upward rating movement is possible if the company can achieve and
maintain leverage, as measured by the debt/EBITDA ratio of no more
than 5x, EBIT/interest of at least 2x and (CFO -- Dividends)/debt
of at least 12%. Ratings could be downgraded should debt/EBITDA not
evidence a trend toward 6x, EBIT/interest not trend toward 1.5x or
liquidity weaken.

The SGL-3 reflects the company's adequate liquidity profile, which
is supported by a $600 million (unrated - includes a $300 million
European Revolving Subcommitment) asset backed multi-currency
revolving credit facility (ABL) expiring on June 15, 2020, which
the company intends to increase to up to $750 million and extend
the maturity to 2023. At March 31, 2018, the company's liquidity
position was supported by cash of $79.1 million and $158.4 million
available under the ABL. An additional $5.7 million of restricted
cash is available for payments under the China loan facility.
During the 2nd quarter, the company received the final installment
of $20 million of customer capacity reservation fees, which further
augments liquidity.

The company's liquidity is seen as covering requirements with cash
flow improving on the better earnings performance. The liquidity
position will also be supported by the extension of debt maturities
with the refinancing of the 2020 and 2021 note maturities.

The current ABL, prior to the intended amendment, has a springing
maturity 60 days prior to the maturity date of the 7.875% senior
notes (November 1, 2020), which notes will be repaid upon
completion of the refinancing.

Structural considerations

Under Moody's loss given default methodology, the B3 rating on the
senior secured 1st lien term loan, at the same level as the CFR,
reflects its preponderance in the capital structure. The security
package for the term loans includes US plant, property and
equipment. The 1st lien term loan has a second priority interest in
the ABL collateral. The Caa2 rating on the senior secured junior
priority notes reflects the weaker position of the notes in the
liabilities waterfall behind the asset-based lending facility, the
1st lien term loan , and priority accounts payable.

Headquartered in Beachwood, Ohio, Aleris is a global aluminum
rolled products company with operations in North America, Europe
and China. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2018 the company
reported revenues of $3 billion.


AMERICAN UNDERWRITING: Seeks to Hire GGG Partners, Appoint CRO
--------------------------------------------------------------
American Underwriting Services, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to hire GGG
Partners, LLC, and appoint Kevin Van de Grift as its chief
restructuring officer.

Mr. Van de Grift, a shareholder of GGG Partners, and his firm will
assume all management and financial control of the Debtor, which
include budgeting and forecasting, formulation of Chapter 11 plan,
financial reporting and employment-related matters.

Mr. Van de Grift will charge an hourly fee of $300.  His firm
received a pre-bankruptcy retainer of $20,000.

In a court, Mr. Van de Grift disclosed that his firm does not have
any connection with the Debtor or any of its creditors.

GGG Partners can be reached through:

     Kevin Van de Grift
     GGG Partners, LLC
     3155 Roswell Road NW, Suite 120
     Atlanta, GA 30305
     Office: (404) 256-0003
     Direct: (678) 793-2447
     Email: kvandegrift@gggpartners.com

               About American Underwriting Services

American Underwriting Services, LLC --
http://www.americanunderwritingservices.com/-- is a program
underwriter based in Atlanta, Georgia.  The company specializes in
insurance products for the transportation industry, including
commercial auto liability, motor truck cargo, auto physical damage,
property, and general liability lines of business.

American Underwriting Services filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-58406) on May 18, 2018, listing $1.45 million
in assets and $8.38 million in liabilitied.  The petition was
signed by James Russell Wiley, sole SH of The Wiley Group, Inc.,
manager.

Anna Mari Humnicky, Esq., and Gus H. Small, Esq., at Small Herrin,
serve as the Debtor's counsel.  Kevin Van de Grift at GGG Partners,
LLC, is the Debtor's chief restructuring officer.


APB IMPORTS: Case Summary & 4 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------
Affiliated companies that filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                   Case No.
    ------                                   --------
    APB Imports, Inc.                        18-03273
    1351 Ashford Ave.
    San Juan, PR 00908

    Condado Realty Co., Inc.                 18-03274
    1351 Ashford Ave.
    San Juan, PR 00908

Business Description: APB Imports and Condado Realty Co. are
                      lessors of real estate based in San Juan,
                      Puerto Rico.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 10, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Puerto Rico (Old San Juan)

Debtors' Counsel: Alexis Fuentes-Hernandez, Esq.
                  FUENTES LAW OFFICES, LLC
                  PO Box 9022726
                  San Juan, PR 00902
                  Tel: (787) 722-5216
                  Fax: (787) 722-5206
                  E-mail: alex@fuentes-law.com

Assets and Liabilities:


                        Estimated              Estimated
                          Assets              Liabilities
                       ------------           ------------
APB Imports       $1 mil. to $10 million  $1 mil. to $10 million
Condado Realty    $1 mil. to $10 million  $1 mil. to $10 million

The petitions were signed by Aurora M. Ray Chacon, secretary.

A full-text copy of APB Imports' petition containing, among other
items, a list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb18-03273.pdf

A full-text copy of Condado Realty's petition containing, among
other items, a list of the Debtor's four unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb18-03274.pdf


APEX XPRESS: Examiner Seeks to Hire Mellinger Sanders as Attorney
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth J. DeGraw, the court-appointed examiner of Apex Xpress,
Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey to employ Mellinger Sanders & Sanders, LLC,
as attorney to the Examiner.

The Examiner requires Mellinger Sanders to provide legal services
and represent the Examiner in the bankruptcy proceedings.

Mellinger Sanders will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Steven P. Kartzman, Esq          $415
     Joseph R. Zapata, Esq.           $375
     Judah B. Loewenstein, Esq.       $275

Mellinger Sanders will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Steven P. Kartzman, a partner at Mellinger Sanders & Sanders,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Mellinger Sanders can be reached at:

     Steven P. Kartzman, Esq.
     Joseph R. Zapata, Jr., Esq.
     MELLINGER SANDERS & SANDERS, LLC
     101 Gibraltar Drive, Suite 2F
     Morris Plains, NJ 07950
     Tel: (973) 267-0220
     E-mail: skartzman@msklaw.net
             jzapata@msklaw.net

                     About Apex Xpress, Inc.

Apex Xpress, Inc., formerly known as Apex Trucking, provides
transportation services.  The Company offers copier, car, and
motorcycle transportation services, as well as warehousing, copier
installation, prepping, flatbed and building services.  The Company
has locations in Secaucus, New Jersey, Brooklyn, Maryland and
Brockton, Massachusetts.

Apex Xpress Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 18-13134) on Feb. 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Robert M. Cerchione, president, the Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million, and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.  

The Hon. Stacey L. Meisel presides over the case.  

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP is the Debtor's counsel.

On May 19, 2018, an order was entered approving the appointment of
Kenneth J. DeGraw, as the examiner of Apex Xpress.  The Examiner
hired Mellinger Sanders & Sanders, LLC, as attorney.


APEX XPRESS: Examiner Seeks to Hire Withum Smith as Accountant
--------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth J. DeGraw, the court-appointed examiner of Apex Xpress,
Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey to employ Withum Smith & Brown, PC, as
accountant to the Examiner.

The Examiner requires Withum Smith to provide accounting services
and assist him in carrying out his duties as the Examiner in the
bankruptcy case.

Withum Smith will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Erica Lian         $320
         Louis DePiano      $210

Withum Smith will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Kenneth J. DeGraw, a partner at Withum Smith & Brown, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Withum Smith can be reached at:

     Kenneth DeGraw
     WITHUM SMITH & BROWN PC
     200 Jefferson Park, Suite 400
     Whippany, NJ 07981
     Tel: (973) 898-9494
     Fax: (973) 898-0686
     E-mail: kdegraw@withum.com

                      About Apex Xpress

Apex Xpress, Inc., formerly known as Apex Trucking, provides
transportation services. The Company offers copier, car, and
motorcycle transportation services, as well as warehousing, copier
installation, prepping, flatbed and building services. The Company
has locations in Secaucus, New Jersey, Brooklyn, Maryland and
Brockton, Massachusetts.

Apex Xpress Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.N.J.
Case No. 18-13134) on Feb. 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Robert M. Cerchione, president, the Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million, and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.  The Hon. Stacey L. Meisel presides over the case.  Saul
Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP is the Debtor's counsel.

On May 19, 2018, an order was entered approving the appointment of
Kenneth J. DeGraw, as the examiner of Apex Xpress.  The Examiner
hired Mellinger Sanders & Sanders, LLC, as attorney.


ARCON PROPERTIES: CBC Objects to Proposed Amended Disclosures
-------------------------------------------------------------
CBC Partners I, LLC, filed an objection to Arcon Properties, LLC
and Arcon Homes, LLC's amended joint disclosure statement in
support of their proposed plans of reorganization.

CBC contends that the amended joint disclosure statement should not
be approved because it does not contain the information necessary
to enable a hypothetical reasonable creditor to make an informed
judgment about the Debtors' Chapter 11 Plans, including whether to
vote to accept or reject the Plans and to assess the Debtors'
ability to satisfy their obligations. A disclosure statement
represents the primary source of information for creditors to
determine whether to vote to accept or reject a proposed plan and
in this case, the information contained in the amended disclosure
statement is extremely vague and lacking in detail.

Among other things, the amended disclosure statement does not
contain adequate information about the funding of the plans of
reorganization. It provides that the Debtors will obtain funding to
execute the Plans. However, the description of the funding is so
lacking in detail as to be meaningless.

The vague pronouncements contained in Section 4.1 and in Section
6.10 of the amended disclosure statement provide no details
whatsoever. No information or details are provided as to the three
referenced possibilities, specifically a potential cash infusion, a
potential refinance, or a potential sale. No background, amounts,
or other details are provided to enable a party to make an informed
judgment regarding the viability of the possibilities.

The various scenarios put forth of potential cash infusion,
potential refinance, or potential sale demonstrates that the
Debtors really have no definitive idea of what they will do and how
they will proceed. At best, the Plans are premature. At worst, they
are illusory and nonexistent. Such Plans cannot be confirmed.

The amended disclosure statement's feasibility analysis is also
completely lacking. There is no reference to the Debtors'
historical performance, nor even any projections. This information
is critical because the Debtors seek to solicit acceptances based
on a variety of vastly different scenarios, ranging from an
investor to a refinancing, or possibly a sale.

For these reasons, CBC requests that the Court enter an order
denying approval of the amended disclosure statement and granting
such further relief as may be necessary or appropriate.

A full-text copy of CBC's Objection is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb1-18-00212-98.pdf

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that Arcon
Properties is seeking a capital infusion by obtaining funds through
the issuance of new membership interest in the company with the use
of the assets of its affiliates, and new financing which will be
utilized as a refinance of the company's existing debt.

Copies of the companies' amended Chapter 11 plans and disclosure
statement are available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb18-00212-86.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb18-00213-49.pdf
     http://bankrupt.com/misc/pamb18-00212-88.pdf

Counsel for CBC Partners I, LLC:

     Brian W. Bisignani, Esquire
     Paula J. McDermott, Esquire
     POST & SCHELL, P.C.
     17 North 2nd Street, 12th Floor
     Harrisburg, PA 17101
     Telephone: (717) 612-6041
     Fax: (717)731-1985
     bbisignani@postschell.com

            About Arcon Properties and Arcon Homes

Arcon Properties, LLC is a Pennsylvania company which commenced
business in April, 2013.  It was formed for the purpose of owning a
real property located at 195 Airport Road, Selinsgrove, Snyder
County, Pennsylvania.  The real estate was initially to be utilized
as a manufactured building plant and associated offices.

Arcon Homes, LLC was formed for the purpose of owning equipment and
various vehicles and carriers to be utilized in the manufactured
building business.  It is a Pennsylvania company, which commenced
business in 2007.

Arcon Properties and Arcon Homes sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case Nos. 18-00212 and
18-00213) on January 22, 2018.  The petitions were signed by
Merrill D. Miller, Jr., member.  

At the time of the filing, Arcon Properties disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.
Arcon Homes disclosed that it had estimated assets of less than
$500,000 and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Robert N. Opel II presides over the cases.  

The Debtors are represented by Robert E. Chernicoff, Esq., at
Cunningham, Chernicoff & Warshawsky P.C.


ARMONK SNACK: Not Tenant on Lease Agreement with FSNR, RPR
----------------------------------------------------------
District Court Judge Nelson S. Roman affirms Bankruptcy Court Judge
Robert D. Drain's orders dated June 15, 2016, June 10, 2016, and
Jan. 13, 2017 and dismisses the appeals cases captioned ARMONK
SNACK MART, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY SERVICE ARMONK, INC. f/d/b/a
FRIENDLY SERVICE NEW ROCHELLE, INC., Appellant, v. ROBERT PORPORA
REALTY CORP., Appellee. ARMONK SNACK MART, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY
SERVICE ARMONK, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY SERVICE NEW ROCHELLE, INC.,
Appellant, v. ROBERT PORPORA REALTY CORP., Appellee. ARMONK SNACK
MART, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY SERVICE ARMONK, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY
SERVICE NEW ROCHELLE, INC., Appellant, v. GAS LAND PETROLEUM, INC.,
an assignee of BPD BANK, A New York Chartered Bank, Appellee.
ARMONK SNACK MART, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY SERVICE ARMONK, INC.
f/d/b/a FRIENDLY SERVICE NEW ROCHELLE, INC., Appellant, v. GAS LAND
PETROLEUM, INC., MAJED NESHEIWAT, MOUSA MART, INC., and MOUSA
NESHEIWAT, Appellees. ARMONK SNACK MART, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY
SERVICE ARMONK, INC. f/d/b/a FRIENDLY SERVICE NEW ROCHELLE, INC.,
Appellant, v. ROBERT PORPORA ROBERT PORPORA REALTY CORP., and
ROBERT PORPORA REALTY, INC., Appellee, No. 16-cv-5887 (NSR),
Chapter 11 No. 15-22375 (RDD), No. 16-cv-6065 (NSR), Adv. Pro. No.
15-8225 (RDD), No. 16-cv-6640 (NSR), Adv. Pro. No. 15-8225 (RDD),
No. 17-cv-6400 (NSR), Adv. Pro. No. 15-8226 (RDD), No. 17-cv-6403
(NSR), Adv. Pro. No. 15-8226 (RDD) (S.D.N.Y.).

These appeals arise out of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy matter of
Debtor Armonk Snack Mart, Inc. f/d/b/a Friendly Service Armonk,
Inc. f/d/b/a Friendly Service New Rochelle, Inc. The principal case
arose out of Armonk's voluntary Chapter 11 petition filed in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and
concerns commercial property located at 360 Main Street, Armonk,
New York (the "Premises") on which Robert Porpora Realty Corp. is
the landlord.

The other appeals involve appellees Robert Porpora, Robert Porpora
Realty, Inc., Gas Land Petroleum, Inc., Majed Nesheiwat, Mousa
Mart, Inc., and Mousa Nesheiwat. All of the appeals relate to the
following three agreements concerning the subject Premises:

   (1) a lease agreement dated Jan. 24, 2002 and entered into
between Friendly Service New Rochelle, Inc. and Porpora Realty;

   (2) a letter agreement dated July 1, 2009 between Porpora Realty
and Friendly; and

   (3) a purchase agreement between Porpora Realty and Gas Land
dated Feb. 3, 2012.

In sum, Armonk maintains it was the rightful tenant under the Lease
and entitled to exercise the purchase option thereunder, it was
entitled to give effect to the Letter Agreement and that by
entering into the Gas Land Agreement, Porpora Realty, Gas Land, and
others conspired to tortuously interfere with Armonk's rights under
the Lease and Letter Agreement.

The success of each appeal turns on the question of whether
Bankruptcy Court Judge Robert D. Drain properly applied collateral
estoppel to a state court determination that Armonk was not a
successor in interest to Friendly. Upon applying this doctrine,
Judge Drain found that Armonk was not a tenant pursuant to the
Lease and thus denied its motion to assume in the principle
Bankruptcy case (15-22375(RDD)). The remaining appeals stem from
various motions to remand to state court and for summary judgment
that were granted in light of the finding on the motion to assume.

The central issue to all of the Appeals is whether Judge Drain
properly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel to Justice
Bellantoni's Oct. 3, 2014 Amended Judgment (and the Appellate
Division's affirmance). Appellees contend that Judge Drain properly
applied collateral estoppel to the finding that Armonk was not the
same legal entity as, or the successor in interest to Friendly,
leading to the conclusion that Armonk was not the tenant on the
Lease and triggering denial of the motion to assume. Armonk, on the
other hand, principally argues that the elements of collateral
estoppel have not been met and that the equities do not favor the
application of the doctrine in this case. The Court agrees with
Judge Drain's application of collateral estoppel, warranting
affirmance of his Orders and dismissal of all of the appeals.

The Court concludes that Judge Drain properly applied collateral
estoppel to preclude Armonk's claims in Bankruptcy Court. Judge
Drain's finding that Armonk was not the tenant, was not clearly
erroneous. In fact, Judge Drain was compelled to decide as much,
once he found that collateral estoppel was applicable. There was no
clear error. The State Court has already decided that Armonk was
not the same legal entity as, or successor in interest to,
Friendly, a critical issue to all of Armonk's Appeals.
Consequently, the Court also finds that Judge Drain properly
remanded the Foreclosure Action and Holdover Proceeding to State
Court and granted summary judgment to Gas Land and Porpora Realty.
Additionally, the Court finds Armonk's motion for a stay moot.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 15,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2ybsBgn from Leagle.com.

Armonk Snack Mart, Inc., formerly doing business as Friendly
Service of Armonk, Inc., formerly doing business as Friendly
Service of New Rochelle, Inc., In Re, represented by Joseph Patrick
Garland, Korsinky & Klein, LLP.

Armonk Snack Mart, Inc., formerly doing business as Friendly
Service of Armonk, Inc., formerly doing business as Friendly
Service of New Rochelle, Inc., Debtor, represented by Joseph
Patrick Garland, Korsinky & Klein, LLP.

Armonk Snack Mart, Inc., formerly doing business as Friendly
Service of Armonk, Inc., formerly doing business as Friendly
Service of New Rochelle, Inc., Appellant, represented by Anne Julia
Penachio -- apenachio@pmlawllp.com -- Penachio Malera, L.L.P. &
Joseph Patrick Garland, Korsinky & Klein, LLP.

Robert Porpora, Robert Porpora Realty Corp. & Robert Porpora
Realty, Inc., Appellees, represented by Salvatore La Monica,
LaMonica, Herbst & Maniscalco.

                   About Armonk Snack Mart

Armonk Snack Mart, Inc. owns and manages a gasoline service station
and convenience store located at 360 Main Street, Armonk, New York.
The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 15-22375) on March 24, 2015.  The
Debtor did not disclose its assets and liabilities at the time of
its filing.


ATLANTA GROTNES: Unsecureds to Get 100% Under Chapter 11 Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Atlanta Grotnes Machine Company, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Georgia a disclosure statement
to accompany the plan of reorganization, to provide Creditors with
the greatest possible value that can be realized on their
respective claims and that the Plan is in the best interests of all
Creditors.

Under the Plan, Class 3 consists of all Unsecured Claims other than
the Alice Grotnes Claim.  Each holder of an Allowed Unsecured Claim
in Class 3 will receive Distribution in an amount equal to one
hundred percent (100%) of its Allowed Unsecured Claim (without
interest), which will be paid in a lump sum within thirty (30) days
from the effective date of the Plan.

Class 4 consists of the Alice Grotnes Claim. On the effective date,
this claim will become an Allowed Unsecured Claim in the full
amount asserted of $445,000 and the holder of the claim will be
issued a note by the reorganized Debtor in the principal amount of
$445,000 with such interest rate and payment terms mutually agreed
upon.

In January of 2018, the Debtor entered into a purchase agreement
with The Renee Group, LLC, to sell the Property for the gross
purchase price of $1,250,000, less certain adjustments described in
the Agreement.  On April 13, the Court entered an order authorizing
the sale of the Property to the Buyer.  The Debtor expects that the
sale of the Property will close prior to the Confirmation Hearing.
The Debtor believes that the proceeds generated from the sale of
the Property will be sufficient to fund the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb17-61383-61.pdf

                      About Atlanta Grotnes

Atlanta Grotnes Machine Company, a company based in Atlanta,
Georgia, is engaged in the metalworking machinery manufacturing
industry.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-61383) on June 30, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Alan Grotnes, vice-president of operations, the
Debtor had $1.21 million in total assets and $2.23 million in total
liabilities as of June 29, 2017.

Scroggins & Williamson, P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.  Reliant
Real Estate Partners, LLC, serves as the Debtor's real estate
broker.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


AUSTLEN BABY: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Austlen Baby Co.
           fka City Bebe Ltd.
        10931 Jollyville Road, Suite 100
        Austin, TX 78759

Business Description: Austlen Baby Co. -- https://www.austlen.com
                      -- creates baby gear and products that make
                      being a parent a little easier.  Austlen
                      Baby Co.'s flagship product is the Entourage
                      Stroller, a 3-stage expansion stroller
                      with adjustable market tote, platform rider
                      and stowable jump seat, reclining and
                      stowable second seat, and dual car seat
                      compatibility.  Austlen Baby Co. was founded
                      by CEO Leslie Stiba.  Austlen Baby Co. is
                      based in Austin, with a design and
                      engineering office in Philadelphia.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 10, 2018

Case No.: 18-10749

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas (Austin)

Judge: Hon. Christopher H. Mott

Debtor's Counsel: Kell C. Mercer, Esq.
                  KELL C. MERCER, PC
                  1602 E Cesar Chavez St
                  Austin, TX 78702
                  Tel: (512) 627-3512
                  Fax: (512) 597-0767
                  Email: kell.mercer@mercer-law-pc.com

Total Assets: $13.24 million

Total Liabilities: $4.37 million

The petition was signed by Leslie Stiba, president and chief
executive officer.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb18-10749.pdf

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Britney Dann Knowlton             Convertible Note        $10,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Centrility Limited                Convertible Note        $25,000
Liability Company                Purchase Agreement

Cristina Bejanaro & Kevin         Convertible Note        $35,000
O'Shaughnessey                   Purchase Agreement

DLA Piper LLP                      Legal Services        $133,445

Erik & Beth Cohen                 Convertible Note        $25,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Guangdong Roadmate Group             Trade Debt           $53,925
Co., Ltd.

Harish K. Gagneja                 Convertible Note        $40,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

J.P. Morgan Chase                    Trade Debt           $25,091

Jan M. Betts                      Convertible Note       $150,000
Irrevocable Trust                Purchase Agreement

Ken Shifrin                       Convertible Note       $150,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Kevin Smith                       Convertible Note        $20,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

LCB Resources                     Convertible Note        $20,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Lee Rogers                        Convertible Note        $10,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Melodie Zamora                    Convertible Note        $25,000
Summersett                       Purchase Agreement

Michael Misikoff                  Convertible Note       $150,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

PICOSA Investments LLC            Convertible Note        $65,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Ryan C. Murdock                   Convertible Note        $25,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Shirley Sheffield                 Convertible Note        $15,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Tommy Wald                        Convertible Note        $25,000
                                 Purchase Agreement

Woodson Wynden                    Convertible Note        $50,000
Limited Partnership              Purchase Agreement


AUTO MASTERS: Seeks to Hire Tamarez CPA as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------
Auto Masters Express, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico to employ Tamarez
CPA, LLC, as accountant to the Debtor.

Auto Masters requires Tamarez CPA to:

   a. reconcile financial information to assist the Debtor in the
      preparation of monthly operating reports;

   b. assist in the reconciliation and clarification of proof of
      claims filed and amount due to creditors;

   c. provide general accounting and tax services to prepare
      year-end reports and income tax preparation; and

   d. assist the Debtor and the Debtor's counsel in the
      preparation of the supporting documents for the Chapter 11
      Reorganization Plan.

Tamarez CPA will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Albert Tamarez-Vasquez, CPA, CIRA        $150
     CPA Supervisor                           $100
     Senior Accountant                         $85
     Staff Accountant                          $65

Tamarez CPA will be paid a retainer in the amount of $2,000.

Tamarez CPA will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Albert Tamarez-Vasquez, a partner at Tamarez CPA, LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Tamarez CPA can be reached at:

     Albert Tamarez-Vasquez
     TAMAREZ CPA, LLC
     1519 Ave. Ponce De Leon, Suite 412
     San Juan, PR 00909-1713
     Tel: (787) 795-2855
     Fax: (787) 200-7912
     E-mail: atamarez@tamarezcpa.com

                  About Auto Masters Express

Auto Masters Express, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 18-01464) on March 19, 2018.  Carlos
Alberto Ruiz Law Offices is serving as counsel.


B&P DEVELOPMENT: Seeks to Hire Barron & Newburger as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
B&P Development, LLP, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Texas to employ Barron &
Newburger, PC, as counsel to the Debtor.

B&P Development requires Barron & Newburger to:

   a. advise the Debtor of its rights, powers, and duties as a
      debtor-in-possession continuing to manage its assets;

   b. review the nature and validity of claims asserted against
      the property of the Debtor and advise the Debtor concerning
      the enforceability of such claims;

   c. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary and
      appropriate applications, motions, pleadings, draft orders,
      notices, schedules, and other documents and review all
      financial and other reports to be filed in the Chapter 11
      case;

   d. advise the Debtor concerning and prepare responses to,
      applications, motions, complaints, pleadings, notices, and
      other papers which may be filed in the Chapter 11 case;

   e. counsel the Debtor in connection with the formulation,
      negotiation, and promulgation of a plan of reorganization
      and related documents;

   f. perform all other legal services for and on behalf of the
      Debtor which may be necessary and appropriate in the
      administration of the Chapter 11 case and the Debtor's
      business; and

   g. work with professionals retained by other parties in
      interest in the bankruptcy case to attempt to obtain
      approval of a consensual plan of reorganization of the
      Debtor.

Barron & Newburger will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                   $175 to $495
     Support Staff                $40 to $100

Barron & Newburger will be paid a retainer in the amount of
$15,000.  The amount of $2,192 was deducted from the retainer for
prepetition services, leaving a balance of 12,809.

Barron & Newburger will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Stephen W. Sather, a partner at Barron & Newburger, PC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Barron & Newburger can be reached at:

     Stephen W. Sather, Esq.
     BARRON & NEWBURGER, PC
     7320 N. MoPac Expwy., Suite 400
     Austin, TX 78731
     Tel: (512) 476-9103

                     About B&P Development

B&P Development filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case
No. 18-10525) on April 26, 2018.  In the petition signed by Jeffrey
Mitchell, member, the Debtor disclosed $1.13 million in assets and
$1.33 million in liabilities.  The Hon. Tony M. Davis presides over
the case.  Stephen W. Sather, Esq., at Barron & Newburger, PC,
serves as bankruptcy counsel.




B.J.'S DRILL: Hires Patten, Peterman, Bekkedahl & Green as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
B.J.'S Drill Stem Testing, Inc., seeks authority from the United
States Bankruptcy Court for the District of North Dakota (Fargo) to
hire John M. Van Atta and Blake A. Robertson of Patten, Peterman,
Bekkedahl & Green PLLC as counsel.

The counsel will render legal advice and counsel as may be required
by the Debtor during the Chapter 11 proceedings due to the
diversity and ramifications of the various legal questions which
have arisen, have been presented or may arise in the future and for
the purpose of investigating and determining the interests of the
Debtor in miscellaneous real and personal property, to bring such
legal action as may be necessary to establish the Applicant's right
in such property.

John M. Van Atta,  attorney at Patten, Peterman, Bekkedahl & Green
PLLC, attests that his firm does not holds or represents any
interest adverse to the interests of the Debtor or the Estate and
he and his firm are disinterested parties of the Debtor.

The Counsel's hourly rates are:

     John Van Atta                                  $225
     Blake A. Robertson and other attorneys     $175 to $330

The firm can be reached through:

      Blake Robertson, Esq.
      John M. Van Atta, Esq.
      PATTEN, PETERMAN, BEKKEDAHL & GREEN PLLC
      2817 2nd Avenue North, Ste. 300
      Billings, MT 59101
      Tel: 406-252-8500
      Email: brobertson@ppbglaw.com

                About B.J.'S Drill Stem Testing

B.J.'S Drill Stem Testing, Inc., offers drill stem testing services
and equipment rental. The company is based in Mohall, North
Dakota.

B.J.'S Drill Stem Testing filed a petition for reorganization under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the US Code (Bankr. D. N.D. Case No.
18-30340) on June 1, 2018, listing $1.12 million in total assets
and $1.57 million in total liabilities.  The petition was signed by
Corey Welter, member.

Blake Robertson, Esq. and John M. Van Atta, Esq., at PATTEN,
PETERMAN, BEKKEDAHL & GREEN PLLC, serve as the Debtor's counsel.


BEAVER-VISITEC INT'L: Moody's Alters Outlook to Stable, Affirms CFR
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service changed the rating outlook of
Beaver-Visitec International Holdings, Inc. ("BVI") to stable from
negative. At the same time, Moody's affirmed BVI's ratings
including its B3 Corporate Family Rating (CFR), B3-PD Probability
of Default Rating, as well as the B3 rating for its first lien
senior secured credit facilities.

"BVI's recent strong revenue and earnings growth has driven greater
deleveraging than we had initially anticipated. Giving partial
credit for certain cost initiatives, Moody's adjusted TTM
debt-to-EBITDA has declined to 5.8x as of March 31, 2018 from 6.5x
in April 2017. This positive operating momentum, coupled with our
expectation for a successful ramp-up of the new Juarez facility,
supports our view that financial risk will be well in line with the
B3 rating category over the next 12 to 18 months," said Joanna Zeng
O'Brien, Moody's lead analyst for the company.

Rating actions:

Corporate Family Rating, affirmed B3

Probability of Default Rating, affirmed B3-PD

$30 million senior secured revolving credit facility, affirmed B3
(LGD3)

$300 million senior secured first lien term loan, affirmed B3
(LGD3)

Outlook: Changed to Stable from Negative

Ratings Rationale

BVI's B3 CFR broadly reflects its high financial leverage with pro
forma Moody's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA of 5.8x as of March 31, 2018,
small absolute size based on sales and high concentration in low
tech offerings within a niche product area. The rating is also
constrained by the potential for more customers to purchase bundled
products from its competitors, risk of technological obsolescence,
and event and financial policy risk due to private equity
ownership. However, the rating is supported by its long-standing
presence in the cataract surgery space, low dependence on top
customers, and limited regulatory risk due to its low tech
products. The rating also benefits from Moody's expectation for
solid top line growth in the high single digits and its good
liquidity profile.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the company
will remain small, and concentrated in a niche market and that
revenue will grow in the high single digits over the next 12 to 18
months. The stable outlook also reflects Moody's expectation that
Juarez facility ramp up and transition will progress as expected
without any disruption to operations.

The ratings could be downgraded if there is significant weakening
in operating performance or if there is deterioration in liquidity
profile with free cash flow turning negative. Debt-to-EBITDA
sustained above 6.0x driven by aggressive financial policies could
also pressure the ratings.

The ratings could be upgraded if, over time, there is a material
increase in scale or diversification. The ratings could also be
upgraded if BVI maintains a good liquidity profile with adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA sustained below 4.0x.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Medical Product
and Device Industry published in June 2017.

Beaver-Visitec International Holdings, Inc. (BVI), headquartered in
Waltham, Massachusetts, is a global manufacture of largely
disposable products used in eye surgeries, primarily cataract
procedures. BVI is owned by private equity firm TPG Capital. LTM
revenue was of March 31, 2018 was $163 million.


BELLA BAG LLC: Seeks to Hire Jones & Walden as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Bella Bag, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Georgia to employ Jones & Walden, LLC, as
counsel to the Debtor.

Bella Bag, LLC, requires Jones & Walden to:

   a. prepare pleadings and applications;

   b. conduct of examination;

   c. advise the Debtor of its rights, duties and obligations as
      a debtor-in-possession;

   d. consult with the Debtor and represent the Debtor with
      respect to a Chapter 11 plan;

   e. perform those legal services incidental and necessary to
      the day-to-day operations of the Debtor's business,
      including, but not limited to, institution and prosecution
      of necessary legal proceedings, and general business legal
      advice and assistance;

   f. take any and all other action incident to the proper
      preservation and administration of the Debtor's estate and
      business.

Jones & Walden will be paid at these hourly rates:

          Attorneys          $200 to $350
          Paralegals            $100

Jones & Walden will be paid a retainer in the amount of $30,000.

Jones & Walden will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Cameron McCord, a partner at Jones & Walden, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Jones & Walden can be reached at:

     Cameron McCord
     JONES & WALDEN, LLC
     21 Eighth Street, NE
     Atlanta, GA 30309
     Tel: (404) 564-9300
     E-mail: cmccord@joneswalden.com

                         About Bella Bag

Bella Bag, LLC -- https://www.bellabag.com/ -- is a privately held,
Atlanta-based company that buys and sells pre-owned designer-label
handbags like Chanel, Louis Vuitton, Dior, Gucci, Hermes and Prada.
With authenticity as the cornerstone of the Bella Bag brand,
in-house experts meticulously inspect each handbag for authenticity
using the company's patent-pending 13-Step Authenticity Inspection.


Bella Bag, LLC, based in Atlanta, GA, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 18-58840) on May 30, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Cassandra Connors, managing member, the Debtor
estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Barbara Ellis-Monro presides over the case.
Cameron McCord, Esq., at Jones & Walden, LLC, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.


BEST ROAD VIEW: Hires Better Homes as Real Estate Broker
--------------------------------------------------------
Best Road View, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of New York to employ Better Homes and
Garden Real Estate Tech Valley, as real estate broker to the
Debtor.

Best Road View requires Better Homes to market and sell the
Debtor's real property located at 1468A Best Road, East Greenbush,
NY.

Better Homes will be paid a commission of 5% of the purchase
price.

Wayne Richard, member of Better Homes and Garden Real Estate Tech
Valley, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person"
as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code
and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estates.

Better Homes can be reached at:

     Wayne Richard
     BETTER HOMES AND GARDEN REAL
     ESTATE TECH VALLEY
     471 Albany-Shaker Road
     Loudonville, NY 12211
     Tel: (518) 435-9944

                     About Best Road View

Best Road View, LLC filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No.
16-11968) on Oct. 28, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by Michael
Leo Boyle, Esq., at Tully Rinckey PLLC.  Best Road View, LLC, filed
its proposed Chapter 11 plan on Oct. 10, 2017.


BIOSTAGE INC: Two Directors Quit From Board
-------------------------------------------
John J. Canepa and Blaine H. McKee have resigned as members of the
Board of Directors and Audit Committee Biostage, Inc.  Messrs.
Canepa's and Mr. McKee's resignations were not the result of any
disagreements with the Company on any matter relating to the
Company's operations, policies or practices, the Company stated in
a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 7, 2018.  The Company is actively in the process of
identifying highly qualified candidates to replace Mr. Canepa and
Mr. McKee on the Board and its Audit Committee.

                        About Biostage

Headquartered in Holliston, Massachusetts, Biostage, Inc., formerly
Harvard Apparatus Regenerative Technology, Inc. --
http://www.biostage.com/-- is a biotechnology company developing
bio-engineered organ implants based on the Company's new Cellframe
technology which combines a proprietary biocompatible scaffold with
a patient's own stem cells to create Cellspan organ implants.
Cellspan implants are being developed to treat life-threatening
conditions of the esophagus, bronchus or trachea with the hope of
dramatically improving the treatment paradigm for patients.  Based
on its pre-clinical data, Biostage has selected life-threatening
conditions of the esophagus as the initial clinical application of
its technology.

Biostage incurred a net loss of $11.91 million in 2017 and a net
loss of $11.57 million in 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Biostage had
$3.85 million in total assets, $809,000 in total liabilities and
$3.04 million in total stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm KPMG LLP,
in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and will require additional
financing to fund future operations which raise substantial doubt
about its ability to continue as a going concern.


BISHOP GORMAN: JATCO Amended Plan Proposes Lease of Real Property
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Creditor J.A. Tiberti Construction, Inc. filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada a disclosure statement
to accompany its amended plan of reorganization for Debtor Bishop
Gorman Development Corporation.

The Plan seeks to reorganize the Debtor to provide for the payment
of its Allowed Claims, including the JATCO Claim, which is
evidenced by a judgment entered on Jan. 19, 2017, in the Eighth
Judicial District Court confirming a final arbitration award in the
total amount of $28,749,663.34 (the "JATCO Judgment").

On Feb. 13, 2017, JATCO served a Writ of Execution and Writ of
Garnishment on the Diocese and Greenberg Traurig, counsel for
Debtor, which gave rise to a lien, to which the Diocese filed its
Answer of Garnishee acknowledging the Diocese Receivable, a
receivable due to Debtor from the Diocese that according to the
Schedules was in the sum of $4,859,567.42 as of the Petition Date.
Also on Feb. 13, 2017, JATCO served a Writ of Execution and Writ of
Garnishment on BofA, which gave rise to the First BofA Garnishment
Lien. On March 2, 2017, BofA acknowledged it was in possession of
personal property of BGDC, including deposit accounts containing
$5,410,128.42 in funds. On April 4, 2017, the Eighth Judicial
District Court entered its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and
Order, which affirmed the validity and enforceability of the First
BofA Garnishment Lien, and which provided that BofA was required to
pay the $5,410,128.42 in Garnished Funds to JATCO, less the
approximate amount of $135,000 due to BofA on the Diocese Lease.

On July 11, 2017, after the commencement of the Chapter 11 Case,
Debtor filed Adversary Proceeding No. 17-01211 seeking to avoid the
Judgment Lien and the First BofA Garnishment Lien as avoidable
preferences, in addition to other relief that was previously denied
by the Court. Debtor did not seek, however, to avoid the Diocese
Writ. As of the filing of the Plan and this Disclosure Statement,
the JATCO Adversary Proceeding has concluded, and the Court has not
ruled on the avoidance of the Judgment Lien and the First BofA
Garnishment Lien. As such, the Plan and this Disclosure Statement
provides alternative relief to accommodate both potential outcomes
of the Adversary Proceeding. Notwithstanding, BofA asserts a senior
security interest in both the Garnished Funds as well as the
Diocese Obligation.

The primary objective of the Plan is to provide the Debtor a means
to satisfy the Allowed JATCO Claim evidenced by the JATCO Judgment
without having to refinance existing debt or sell its Real
Property. JATCO proposes to achieve this objective through an
increase in the revenues to be received by Debtor from the lease of
the Real Property (Bishop Gorman High School) to meet the proposed
monthly payments due JATCO and to raise the required final payment
of principal and interest through future donations, gifts and other
sources of revenue.

The Plan generally provides for the repayment the JATCO Allowed
Claim against the Debtor as follows: a The granting of a junior
deed of trust in favor of JATCO to secure a payout of the Allowed
JATCO Claim over 8 years with a balloon payment at the end of the
eighth year which requires (a) a limited modification the Bank of
America Credit Facility Documents which at present prohibit any
payments to JATCO but for the execution of a subordination
agreement and a waiver of the bar to the granting of a junior Lien
on the Property, and (b) an increase of the monthly rent paid by
the Diocese pursuant to the Diocese Lease which at present does not
allow for a rental payment in excess of the amount necessary to
satisfy the monthly obligations and fees due with regard to the
Bonds. In the event the Diocese Lease is not voluntarily increased
to meet the obligation due JATCO, the Property will be sold free
and clear of interests.

Class 8 under the plan consists of the Allowed General Unsecured
Claim. This class will be paid in full in Cash on the latest of:
(i) the Effective Date, or as soon thereafter as is practical; (ii)
such date as may be fixed by the Bankruptcy Court, or as soon
thereafter as is practicable; (iii) 14th Business Day after such
Claim is Allowed, or as soon thereafter as is practicable; or (iv)
such date as the Holder of such Claim and Reorganized BGDC have
agreed or will agree, together with interest from the Petition Date
until paid at the Unsecured Interest Rate.

In the event that the Diocese Lease is determined to be a true
lease and the Diocese, Debtor do not elect to enter into an Amended
Diocese Lease on or before the Effective Date and the Diocese Lease
is rejected, then within 14 days of the Effective Date, JATCO will
present to the Bankruptcy Court a procedure to conduct the Section
363(f) Sale free and clear of any remaining rights and interests
that the Diocese may retain under Section 365 to remain in
possession of the Real Property. Any such sale procedure will
provide for the sale to take place no later than 150 days of the
Effective Date with the sale to close no later than 180 days of
the
Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-11942-421.pdf

A full-text copy of the Amended Plan is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-11942-420.pdf

       About Bishop Gorman Development Corporation

Bishop Gorman Development Corporation is a charitable organization
with its principal assets located at 5959 S. Hualapai Way, Las
Vegas, Nevada.  

Bishop Gorman Development filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-11942) on April 17, 2017,
estimating assets and liabilities between $100 million and $500
million each.  Deacon Aruna Silva, executive director, signed the
petition.

Judge August B. Landis presides over the case.  

Brett A. Axelrod, Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor also hired Greenberg
Traurig, LLP, as its special litigation counsel, and Wallace
Neumann & Verville, LLP, as its accountant.


BLUE EAGLE FARMING: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------------
Affiliated companies that filed voluntary petitions on June 8, 2018
seeking relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                           Case No.
    ------                                           --------
    Blue Eagle Farming, LLC                          18-02395
       aka Johnson Farming
    5764-6236 Tucker Mountain Road
    Locust Fork, AL 35097

    H J Farming, LLC                                 18-02397
       aka Johnson Farming
    1357 McCay Road
    Locust Fork, AL 35097

On June 9, 2018, five additional affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

    Debtor                                           Case No.
    ------                                           --------
    Blue Smash Investments, LLC                      18-81707
    307 Commercial Street SE
    Hanceville, AL 35077

    Eagle Ray Investments, LLC                       18-81708
    307 Commercial Street SE
    Hanceville, AL 35077

    Forse Investments, LLC                           18-81709
    307 Commercial Street SE
    Hanceville, AL 35077

    Armor Light, LLC                                 18-81710
    307 Commercial Street SE
    Hanceville, AL 35077

    War-Horse Properties, LLLP                       18-81711
    307 Commercial Street SE
    Hanceville, AL 35077

Business Description: Blue Eagle Farming, LLC and H J Farming, LLC
                      are engaged in the business of cattle
                      ranching and farming.

                      Blue Smash Investments operates in the
                      financial investment industry.

                      Eagle Ray Investments and Forse Investments
                      are lessors of real estate.

                      Armor Light, LLC is engaged in the busiens
                      of residential building construction.

                      War-Horse Properties manages companies and
                      enterprises.

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Northern District of Alabama (Birmingham)

Judge: Hon. Tamara O. Mitchell

Debtors' Counsel: Michael Leo Hall, Esq.
                  BURR & FORMAN LLP
                  420 N 20th Street, Suite 3400
                  Birmingham, AL 35203
                  Tel: 205 458-5367
                  Fax: 205-458-5100
                  E-mail: mhall@burr.com

Assets and Liabilities:

                    Estimated              Estimated
                      Assets              Liabilities
                  ------------          --------------
Blue Eagle   $1 mil. to $10 million  $100 mil. to $500 million
H J Farming  $1 mil. to $10 million   $100,000 to $500,000
Blue Smash   $1 mil. to $10 million         $0 to $50,000
Eagle Ray    $1 mil. to $10 million  $100 mil. to $500 million
Forse Inv.   $1 mil. to $10 million  $100 mil. to $500 million
Armor Light $100,000 to $500,000            $0 to $50,000
War-Horse    $1 mil. to $10 million         $0 to $50,000

The petitions were signed by Robert Bradford Johnson, general
partner of the Debtor's sole owner.

The Debtors each did not file together with their petitions their
lists of 20 largest unsecured creditors.

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-02395.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-02397.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-81707.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-81708.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-81709.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-81710.pdf
        http://bankrupt.com/misc/alnb18-81711.pdf


BNEVMA LLC: July 25 Approval Hearing on Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Erik P. Kimball of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida issued an amended order setting the hearing to
consider approval of BNEVMA, LLC's disclosure statement on July 25,
2018 at 2:00 p.m.

The last day for filing and serving objections to the Disclosure
Statement is July 18, 2018.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that each holder
of an allowed general unsecured claim in Class 36 will share in a
total distribution of $5,000 pro rata. Payments of $1,000 will be
distributed pro rata on an annual basis, commencing on the first of
the month after the Effective Date, until the aggregate amount of
$1,000 is paid.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb18-13392-24.pdf

                       About BNEVMA LLC

BNEVMA, LLC, a real estate lessor, is the fee simple owner of 14
real estate properties (consisting of condominium units and
townhouses) in Wellington, Palm Beach Gardens, Boynton Beach, Lake
Forth, Boca Raton, North Palm Beach, Royal Palm Beach, Florida,
having an aggregate value of $2.71 million.

BNEVMA sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-13392) on March 23, 2018.

In the petition signed by Nermine Hanna, manager, the Debtor
disclosed $2.71 million in assets and $4.01 million in
liabilities.

Judge Paul G. Hyman, Jr., presides over the case.


BOOTIQUE TRENDS: May Use Cash Collateral on Final Basis
-------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades of the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Texas authorized Bootique Trends, Inc.,
to use cash collateral of American Express through the term of the
Final Order.

The Debtor may utilize only cash collateral reflected in the
Debtor's Budget though and including Aug. 31, 2018 plus a 10%
variance per line item.

American Express is believed to assert a validly perfected security
interest in all or substantially all assets of the Debtor.

To secure the repayment of the cash collateral used by the Debtor
during the term of the Final Order, and to the extent the Debtor's
use of cash collateral or American Express' Collateral otherwise
decreases in value during the pendency of this case, American
Express is granted, effective as of the Petition Date, duly
perfected security interests in and liens on all of Debtor's real
and personal property and all proceeds thereof, present and future
products thereof, accessions, substitutions, renewals,
improvements, replacements and additions thereto, now owned or
hereafter acquired, save and except all claims and rights arising
out of avoidable transfers and all property which if recovered or
receivable by the Debtor or any trustee pursuant to any avoidance
or recovery powers. However, the replacement liens will be in the
same priority vis-a-vis other liens as that existing on the
Petition Date and will be valid only with respect to Collateral on
which American Express held validly attached and perfected liens as
of the Petition Date.

A full-text copy of the Final Cash Collateral Order is available
at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb18-40820-38.pdf

                       About Bootique Trends

Bootique Trends, Inc., is a privately held company in Plano, Texas,
specializes in men's and boys' clothing and accessory stores.

Bootique Trends, Inc., d/b/a Gregory's, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No.
18-40820) on April 20, 2018.  In the petition signed by Larry
Matney, director.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated less
than $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in debt.

The Hon. Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the case.


BPS US HOLDINGS: Court Disallows S. Gasowski, et al.'s Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Claimants Samuel E. Gasowski, Rocco Covella, and Sandy
Sepulveda-Ayers filed claims asserting a right to payment based
upon Debtors Old BPSUSH Inc. and affiliates' Prepetition Retention
Program. The Liquidation Trustee objects to those Claims, asserting
that the Claimants waived their rights to receive any payments
under the Prepetition Retention Program when the Claimants received
a post-petition award under the Debtors' court-approved Key
Employee Retention Plan. The Claimants argue that the waivers are
unenforceable under applicable California law and for lack of
consideration.

Judge Kevin J. Carey of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware sustained the Liquidation Trustee's objections and the
Claims are disallowed.

The Claimants argue that the claim waivers in the KERP Letter
Agreements are not enforceable because (i) the KERP letter
agreement is a novation that is not supported by new consideration
and, therefore, is invalid; and (ii) the California Labor Code
prohibits an employer from requiring an employee to provide a
release in return for wages that are due, unless those wages are
paid in full. The Trustee argues in response that (i) the Claimants
received valid and sufficient consideration in exchange for the
payments under the KERP Letter Agreements; and (ii) even assuming
that California law applies to this dispute (which the Trustee does
not concede), the Labor Code section cited by the Claimants is not
applicable here because the Prepetition Retention Program bonuses
were not unconditionally due at the time the KERP Letter Agreements
were signed. The Trustee further argues that the Claims should be
disallowed because federal bankruptcy law preempts the contrary
state law.

The time between execution of the KERP Letter Agreements by the
Claimants (late January or early February 2017) and the Sale
closing (Feb. 27, 2017) is relatively short. But the Trustee points
out that the Claimants signed their respective KERP Letter
Agreements at a time when the Debtors still faced significant
challenges to the approval and consummation of the asset Sale,
including dozens of formal and informal objections or responses to
the Debtors' request for approval of the Sale. And, of course,
"deal risk" is inherent in any such transaction, unrelated to any
challenges that may be imposed by the overlay of a bankruptcy
proceeding.

Therefore, even if the Claimants earned the Prepetition Retention
Program bonuses as of closing, the bonuses were prepetition general
unsecured claims of questionable value. By replacing the
Prepetition Retention Program with the KERP, the Debtors
substituted post-petition administrative priority obligations for
pre-petition general unsecured claims of unknown value, which, at
the time, were far from certain to be paid in full. Additionally,
approval of the KERP Motion, execution of the KERP Letter
Agreements, and payment of the KERP awards occurred months prior to
the negotiation, compromise and global settlement with both
Committees of disputes over purchase price allocation that
ultimately allowed for payment of general unsecured claims in full.
Upon consideration of the facts and circumstances in this case, the
Court concludes that the Claimants received new and valid
consideration in exchange for the KERP payments.

The parties also dispute which state's law applies to this matter.
The Claimants argue that California law applies to matters
concerning the payment of wages in California, regardless of choice
of law provisions in contracts, because "California courts will
refuse to defer to the selected forum if to do so would
substantially diminish the rights of California residents in a way
that violates [the] state's public policy." The Claimants rely upon
the California Labor Code for payment of the Prepetition Retention
Program bonuses." The Trustee argues that the Claimants' signing of
the KERP Letter Agreements could not violate California Labor Code
section 206.5 because the bonuses were not due at that time.

The Court's review of the undisputed facts and the relevant
documents confirms that the Trustee's arguments are sound. Even
assuming that California law applies, the KERP Letter Agreements
did not violate the California Labor Code. The statutes prohibit
"an employer's unilateral act to cause a forfeiture of wages, [and]
are manifestly applicable when wages have been promised as part of
the compensation for employment and all conditions agreed to in
advance for earning those wages have been satisfied." Here, the
conditions required for vesting of the prepetition retention
bonuses had not occurred at the time the Claimants signed the KERP
Letter Agreements.

The Trustee also argues that if the California Labor Code conflicts
with the Order approving the KERP Motion, then principles of
federal conflict preemption require that the state laws yield. The
Court agrees.

"Courts recognize three categories of federal preemption: (1)
express preemption, Where Congress has expressly preempted local
law; (2) field preemption, 'where Congress has legislated so
comprehensively that federal law occupies an entire field of
regulation and leaves no room for state law;' and (3) conflict
preemption, where local law conflicts with federal law such that it
is impossible for a party to comply with both or the local law is
an obstacle to the achievement of federal objectives." Conflict
preemption applies here.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated June 1, 2018 is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb16-12373-1787.pdf

                  About Performance Sports

Exeter, N.H.-based Performance Sports Group Ltd. --
http://www.PerformanceSportsGroup.com/-- is a developer and
manufacturer of ice hockey, roller hockey, lacrosse, baseball and
softball sports equipment, as well as related apparel and soccer
apparel.  

On Oct. 31, 2016, Performance Sports Group Ltd. and certain of its
affiliates filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code in the District of Delaware and commenced
proceedings under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The U.S. Debtors are: BPS US Holdings Inc.; Bauer Hockey, Inc.;
Easton Baseball/Softball Inc.; Bauer Hockey Retail Inc.; Bauer
Performance Sports Uniforms Inc.; Performance Lacrosse Group Inc.;
BPS Diamond Sports Inc.; and PSG Innovation Inc.

The Canadian Debtors are: Performance Sports Group Ltd.; KBAU
Holdings Canada, Inc.; Bauer Hockey Retail Corp.; Easton
Baseball/Softball Corp.; PSG Innovation Corp. Bauer Hockey Corp.;
BPS Canada Intermediate Corp.; BPS Diamond Sports Corp.; Bauer
Performance Sports Uniforms Corp.; and Performance Lacrosse Group
Corp.

The Debtors hired Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP as
counsel; Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as co-counsel;
Stikeman Elliott LLP as Canadian legal counsel; Centerview LLP as
investment banker to the special committee; Alvarez & Marsal North
America, LLC, as restructuring advisor; Joele Frank, Wilkinson,
Brimmer, Katcher as communications & relations advisor; KPMG LLP as
auditors; and Prime Clerk LLC as notice, claims, solicitation and
balloting agent.

Ernst & Young LLP is the monitor in the CCAA cases.  The Monitor
tapped Thornton Grout Finnigan LLP, Allen & Overy LLP, and Buchanan
Ingersoll & Rooney PC as attorneys.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on Nov. 10, 2016,
appointed three creditors of BPS US Holdings, Inc., parent of
Performance Sports, to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The Creditors' Committee retained by Blank Rome LLP as
counsel, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP as Canadian co-counsel, and
Province Inc. as financial advisor.

The U.S. Trustee appointed a committee of equity security holders.

The equity committee is represented by Natalie D. Ramsey, Esq., and
Mark A. Fink, Esq., at Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP;
and Robert J. Stark, Esq., Steven B. Levine, Esq., James W. Stoll,
Esq., and Andrew M. Carty, Esq., at Brown Rudnick LLP.

The U.S. Court appointed M.J. Renick & Associates LLC as the fee
examiner.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter, effective as of Feb.
27, 2017, the Company consummated the sale of substantially all of
the assets of the Company and its North American subsidiaries,
including its European and global operations, pursuant to an asset
purchase agreement, dated as of Oct. 31, 2016, as amended, by and
among the Sellers, 9938982 Canada Inc., an acquisition vehicle
co-owned by affiliates of Sagard Holdings Inc. and Fairfax
Financial Holdings Limited, and the designated purchasers party
thereto, for a base purchase price of US$575 million in aggregate,
subject to certain adjustments, and the assumption of related
operating liabilities.

The transaction was the culmination of the process commenced by the
Sellers pursuant to creditor protection proceedings launched on
Oct. 31, 2016, in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice under the
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, and in the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code, as amended.

The Company conducted a court-supervised sale and auction process
as part of its Canadian and U.S. court proceedings.  The bid made
by the Purchaser served as the "stalking horse" bid for purposes of
the process and was ultimately determined to be the successful bid
in accordance with the related court-approved bidding procedures.

In accordance with, and pursuant to, the terms and conditions of
the Agreement, the Company has changed its name to "Old PSG
Wind-down Ltd." from "Performance Sports Group Ltd." effective as
of March 20, 2017.  BPS US Holdings Inc. changed its name to Old
BPSUSH Inc.

On Aug. 25, 2017, the Debtors filed their Plan of Liquidation and
related Disclosure Statement.  On Oct. 19, 2017, the Debtors filed
their modified Plan of Liquidation and modified Disclosure
Statement.


BRACHA CAB CORP: Seeks to Hire Fred Roth as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------
Bracha Cab Corp., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to
employ Fred Roth, CPA, as accountant to the Debtors.

Bracha Cab Corp. requires Fred Roth to:

   -- assist the Debtors in preparing the necessary tax returns
      required by the state and federal government; and

   -- help prepare financial information for the Debtors'
      disclosure statement.

Fred Roth will be paid as follows:

     Preparation of Tax Returns              $800 per year per
                                             corporation

     All other work                          $150 per hour

Fred Roth will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Fred Roth, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Fred Roth can be reached at:

     Fred Roth
     333 Jericho Turnpike, Suite 122
     Jericho, NY 11753
     Tel: (516) 622-0320

                    About Bracha Cab Corp.

Based in Brooklyn, New York, Bracha Cab Corp. and its affiliates
are privately-held companies in the taxi and limousine services
industry.

Bracha Cab and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-46613) on
Dec. 8, 2017.  In the petitions signed by Esma Elberg, president
and 100% owner, each debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Nancy Hershey Lord presides over the cases.


BRONX MIRACLE GOSPEL: Bankr. Court Dismisses Chapter 11 Case
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Stuart M. Bernstein of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New York granted the U.S. Trustee's motion to dismiss
the chapter 11 case of Debtor Bronx Miracle Gospel Tabernacle Word
of Faith Ministries, Inc.

The U.S. Trustee filed the motion to dismiss with the support of
Newell Funding, LLC, the sole secured creditor of the debtor's
principal asset.

Bankruptcy Code section 1112(b) authorizes a court to dismiss a
chapter 11 case for cause. "Cause" includes a "substantial or
continuing loss to or diminution of the estate and the absence of a
reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation." The last monthly
operating report filed by the debtor covering November 2017 showed
a cumulative net operating loss of $45,140.29 since the Petition
Date. Adding in the unpaid chapter 11 expenses, the cumulative net
loss totaled $82,838.29. By memorandum endorsement and order signed
May 7, 2018, the Court granted the debtor's request to have until
May 18, 2018 to file the remaining monthly operating reports but
the debtor failed to comply. Instead, the debtor submitted a second
request to extend the deadline to file the monthly operating
reports until five days after the Court decides the motion to
dismiss. The granting of the motion to dismiss moots the request
which is otherwise unacceptable because all chapter 11 debtors must
disclose the results of their operations by filing monthly
operating reports, but based on what the debtor has filed, the
Court finds that the estate is suffering a continuing loss and
diminution.

The Court also finds that it is not reasonably likely that the
debtor will be able to rehabilitate. The debtor filed this case one
year ago, and the Court has granted Newell relief from the
automatic stay to complete the foreclosure of the debtor's
principal asset, the Property. Further, the main thrust of the
debtor's opposition is that it owes Newell less than the Judgment
of Foreclosure (or nothing) based on Newell's misconduct and the
debtor's lack of authority to enter into the mortgage. However,
these claims are foreclosed by the Judgment. Moreover, the debtor
recently moved in state court to vacate the Judgment based on the
same claims it makes here. The state court denied the motion,
concluding that the allegations regarding Newell's misconduct had
already been determined by the court when it granted Newell's
motion for summary judgment. In addition, the state court rejected
the debtor’s arguments that the mortgage was unauthorized and the
underlying debt was usurious. It concluded that "[t]he judgment of
foreclosure and sale is not vacated and the sale of the premises
may proceed."

The debtor cannot, therefore, base its prospects for rehabilitation
on its claims against Newell. Additionally, the claims of
professional malpractice against the debtor's state court attorney
and its former tenant are speculative, will take years to litigate,
and do not provide the basis for a successful rehabilitation within
a reasonable time in the near future.

At bottom, this chapter 11 case no longer serves any purpose. The
debtor filed the case to stay the foreclosure sale and refinance
its debt. The Court granted relief from the stay, the foreclosure
will proceed, and the debtor has been unable to refinance its debt
to Newell in the year since the Petition Date. The debtor can
continue to pursue any remedies it may have against Newell or
anyone else in state court, but cannot remain in chapter 11 while
it does so.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated May 23,
2018 is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-11395-64.pdf

Attorneys for Debtor:

     Barak P. Cardenas, Esq.
     CARDENAS ISLAM & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
     175-61 Hillside Avenue, Suite 302
     Jamaica, New York 11432

The U.S. Trustee is represented by:

     Serene K. Nakano, Esq.
     WILLIAM K. HARRINGTON
     United States Trustee
     U.S. Federal Office Building
     201 Varick Street, Rm 1006
     New York, New York 10014
     
Attorneys for Newell Funding, LLC:

     Bruce Minkoff, Esq.
     ROBINOWITZ COHLAN DUBOW & DOHERTY LLP
     199 Main Street
     White Plains, New York 10601

                      About Bronx Miracle

Bronx Miracle Gospel Tabernacle Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-11395) on May 22, 2017,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The
petition was filed pro se.


BUNGALOW 3 NYC: Seeks to Hire Pick & Zabicki as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Bungalow 3 NYC, LLC, d/b/a Tribeca Taphouse, seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
employ Pick & Zabicki LLP, as counsel to the Debtor.

Bungalow 3 NYC requires Pick & Zabicki to:

   a. advise the Debtor with respect to its rights and duties as
      a debtor-in-possession;

   b. assist and advise the Debtor in the preparation of its
      financial statements, schedules of assets and liabilities,
      statement of financial affairs and other reports and
      documentation required pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code and
      the Bankruptcy Rules;

   c. represent the Debtor at all hearings and other proceedings
      relating to its affairs as a Chapter 11 Debtor;

   d. prosecute and defend litigated matters that may arise
      during the Chapter 11 cases;

   e. assist the Debtor in the formulation and negotiation of a
      plan of reorganization and all related transactions;

   f. assist the Debtor in analyzing the claims of creditors and
      in negotiating with such creditors;

   g. prepare any and all necessary motions, applications,
      answers, orders, reports and papers in connection with the
      administration and prosecution of the Debtor's Chapter 11
      case; and

   h. perform such other legal services as may be required and
      deemed to be in the interest of the Debtor in accordance
      with its powers and duties as set forth in the Bankruptcy
      Code.

Pick & Zabicki will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                    $350 to $425
     Associates                     $250
     Paraprofessionals              $125

Pick & Zabicki received a retainer in the amount of $15,000 from
two of the members of the Debtor, Mr. Nicholas McKeon, and Mr.
Joseph Mangini.  The amount of $3,000 was applied out of the
retainer, leaving a balance of $12,000 held in the firm's trust
account.

Pick & Zabicki will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Douglas J. Pick, a partner at Pick & Zabicki, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Pick & Zabicki can be reached at:

     Douglas J. Pick, Esq.
     PICK & ZABICKI LLP
     369 Lexington Avenue, 12th Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Tel: (212) 695-6000

                   About Bungalow 3 NYC, LLC
                     d/b/a Tribeca Taphouse

Located on Greenwich Street, in the heart of Tribeca, Bungalow 3
NYC, LLC, owns Tribeca Tap House, which features a large variety of
craft beers, ciders, and (seasonally) wines on tap.  The unique
selection of drafts accentuate the rejuvenation of New American
cuisine on its palatable menu.

Tribeca, Bungalow 3 NYC, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-11374) on May 4, 2018, estimating under $1
million in assets and liabilities.  Douglas J. Pick, Esq., at PICK
& ZABICKI LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT: Earl, Whitebox Must Produce Certain Docs.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Three discovery motions were filed before the Court over a dispute
on purported claim transfer in the Caesars bankruptcies. These
motions are: a motion from Earl of Sandwich (Atlantic City), LLC to
compel Whitebox Advisors, LLC to produce documents, a motion from
Whitebox to compel Earl to produce documents, and a motion from
Whitebox to "compel" a second Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Earl.

Upon review, Judge A. Benjamin Goldgar of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois Earl's motion is granted in
part and continued in part. Whitebox must produce all documents
withheld in response to Requests Nos. 4 and 8, except those
withheld on privilege grounds. As to those, Whitebox must produce a
privilege log, and Earl's motion will be continued to ensure a log
is produced. Whitebox's motion is granted in part and denied in
part. Earl must produce all documents withheld in response to
Whitebox's Request No. 14, except for organizational charts. As to
the organizational charts, Whitebox's motion is denied and Request
No. 13 is also denied. Whitebox's motion to "compel" a second Rule
30(b)(6) deposition of Earl, construed as a motion for leave to
take the deposition is granted.

Earl served its First Set of Requests for Production of Documents
on Whitebox on Nov. 17, 2017. The Request sought 22 categories of
documents. The only two requests at issue are Nos. 4 and 8. Request
No. 4 seeks "[a]ll [documents concerning the A&R Agreement,
including an executed version thereof." Earl's motion is granted in
part and continued in part because Whitebox has waived its
objections to the Requests with the sole exception of the privilege
objection. Although that objection has arguably been waived as
well, Earl has not claimed a waiver. Whitebox will be given an
opportunity to produce a privilege log that asserts the objection.

Whitebox's objections to Earl's requests as "overbroad" and "unduly
burdensome" are simply boilerplate. Whitebox does not explain what
justifies these conclusions -- that is, what makes the requests
overly broad or unduly burdensome. The objections are therefore
unacceptable. And because Whitebox has not shown good cause for its
failure to assert these objections properly, the objections have
been waived. Whitebox's relevance objection has been waived as
well. The problem with the relevance objection is not specificity.
Whitebox has not asserted its relevance objection in boilerplate
fashion, though doing so would likewise have been unacceptable.

Earl has declined to press for a finding of waiver. Its motion asks
only for an order compelling Whitebox to produce non-privileged
documents and the missing privilege log. Whitebox will accordingly
be given a chance to provide the log, and that part of Earl's
motion is continued.

Whitebox served its Document Requests on Earl on Oct. 19, 2017.
There were 16 requests in all. Only two of Whitebox's requests are
at issue here. Request No. 13 seeks "{a]ll documents concerning Mr.
Thomas Avallone's job responsibilities as Vice Chairman of Earl
Enterprises, including his resume, his employment file[,] and his
employment agreement if such an agreement exists." Request No. 14
seeks "[d]ocuments sufficient to identify the scope of Mr.
Avallone's authority at Earl, including any organization charts in
which he is included."

Whitebox's motion is granted in part and denied in part. As to
Request No. 13, the motion is denied. The request is plainly
overbroad. Even if it were not, the request is not proportional to
the needs of the parties' dispute. As to Request No. 14, the motion
is granted to the extent it seeks documents other than
organizational charts but denied as to the charts themselves. Earl
must produce the documents it has withheld in response to that
request.

Request No. 13 would not be proportional to the needs of the case
even if the documents sought were relevant. Whitebox does not ask
for documents "describing" Avallone's responsibilities at other
EarlEnterprises businesses; Whitebox asks for documents
"concerning" his responsibilities. The difference is important.
Documents "concerning" Avallone's responsibilities includes any
document that illustrates or bears on his exercise of those
responsibilities. In effect, Whitebox requests every document
related in any way to any decision that Avallone has ever made for
any part of EarlEnterprises. Even if his authority to act for other
EarlEnterprises businesses were an issue here (and it is not),
production of all documents relating to every action he has ever
taken for those businesses is inconsistent with the needs of the
case and so is beyond the scope of discovery.

On December 2017, Whitebox served a Rule 3()(b)(6) notice of
deposition on Earl seeking to take Earl's deposition through its
designated representative. The notice listed topics on which the
representative would be examined.

Whitebox's motion is considered a motion for leave to take a second
Rule 3(l(b)(6) deposition of Earl and is granted.

Here, Earl has not met its burden of demonstrating that a second
Rule 30(b)(6) deposition would be inconsistent with either Rule
26(b)(1) or (2). Whitebox has leave to take a second Rule 30(b)(6)
deposition Earl limited to the following topics: (1) Earl’s
litigation hold, (2) Earl’s document retention policies and
practices, and (3) the steps Earl took to respond to Whitebox's
document request.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 29, 2018 Memorandum Opinion is
available at:

   http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb15-01145-7973.pdf

               About Caesars Entertainment

Las Vegas, Nevada-based Caesars Entertainment Corp. (NASDAQ:CZR) --
http://www.caesars.com/-- is one of the world's largest casino
companies.  Caesars casino resorts operate under the Caesars,
Bally's, Flamingo, Grand Casinos, Hilton and Paris brand names.
The Company has its corporate headquarters in Las Vegas.  Harrah's
announced its re-branding to Caesar's in mid-November 2010.

In January 2015, Caesars Entertainment and subsidiary Caesars
Entertainment Operating Company, Inc., announced that holders of
more than 60% of claims in respect of CEOC's 11.25% senior secured
notes due 2017, CEOC's 8.5% senior secured notes due 2020 and
CEOC's 9% senior secured notes due 2020 have signed the Amended and
Restated Restructuring Support and Forbearance Agreement, dated as
of Dec. 31, 2014, among Caesars Entertainment, CEOC and the
Consenting Creditors.  As a result, The RSA became effective
pursuant to its terms as of Jan. 9, 2015.

Appaloosa Investment Limited, et al., owed $41 million on account
of 10% second lien notes in the company, filed an involuntary
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against CEOC (Bankr. D. Del. Case
No. 15-10047) on Jan. 12, 2015.  The bondholders are represented by
Robert S. Brady, Esq., at Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP.

CEOC and 172 other affiliates -- operators of 38 gaming and resort
properties in 14 U.S. states and 5 countries -- filed Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bank. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No. 15-01145) on
Jan. 15, 2015.  CEOC disclosed total assets of $12.3 billion and
total debt of $19.8 billion as of Sept. 30, 2014.

Delaware Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross entered a ruling that the
bankruptcy proceedings will proceed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois.

Kirkland & Ellis serves as the Debtors' counsel.  AlixPartners is
the Debtors' restructuring advisors.  Prime Clerk LLC acts as the
Debtors' notice and claims agent.  Judge Benjamin Goldgar presides
over the cases.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed an official committee of second
priority noteholders and an official unsecured creditors'
committee.

The U.S. Trustee appointed Richard S. Davis as Chapter 11
examiner.

The examiner retained Winston & Strawn LLP, as his counsel; Alvarez
& Marsal Global Forensic and Dispute Services, LLC, as financial
advisor; and Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP, as special conflicts
counsel.


CC LLC: Seeks to Hire DSH Hotel as Real Estate Broker
-----------------------------------------------------
CC, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida to employ DSH Hotel Advisors, as real
estate broker to the Debtor.

CC, LLC, requires DSH Hotel to market and sell the Debtor's assets
consisting of a 300 hotel units which was formerly a condominium
property, and the surrounding parking lot and other common areas
including swimming pool.

DSH Hotel will be paid a commission of 2.5% of the sales price.

Dennis S. Hopper, partner of DSH Hotel Advisors, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

DSH Hotel can be reached at:

     Dennis S. Hopper
     DSH HOTEL ADVISORS
     Tel: (813) 605-1756
     Fax: (941) 777-1121
     E-mail: DennisHopper@DSHHotelAdvisors.com

                          About CC, LLC

CC, LLC, doing business as Baymont Inn Suites, Orlando, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 12-03886) on March
16, 2012.  In the petition signed by Kenneth W. Franklin, Jr.,
managing member, the Debtor estimated its assets at $1 million to
$10 million and debts at $10 million to $50 million.  The Debtor
hired Burr and Forman, LLP as counsel.




CCS ONCOLOGY: Judge Signs 9th Emergency Cash Collateral Order
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael J. Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of New York authorized Comprehensive Cancer
Services Oncology, P.C., and its affiliated-debtors to use cash
collateral as set forth in the Ninth Emergency Order.

Under the Ninth Emergency Order, the Debtors are authorized to use
cash collateral limited to the following purposes and amounts, to
the extent that, in the judgment of the Chapter 11 Trustee, they
are necessary and appropriate for the protection of the interests
of the estates and/or property of the estates:

     (a) To National Fuel, for utility service at several
locations, an amount not to exceed $3,291.32;

     (b) To Hover Networks, for telephone service $875.96;

     (c) To AT&T, for telephone and telecommunications service,
$67.79;

     (d) To Spectrum (Time Warner Cable), for telephone and
communications services $652.50;

     (e) To Lime Energy, $327.67;

     (f) To Verizon, for telephone service, $430.76;

     (g) To ADP, for services relating to the issuance of payroll
and amount not to exceed $250;  

     (h) Weekly payroll for employees of the Debtors Comprehensive
Cancer Services Oncology, P.C. and CCS Medical PLLC and limited to
Oncology and Corporate Employees for the pay period of May 7
through May 11, 2018, with any such payment to any individual
physician employee for this pay period limited to no more than
$2,500 with total payments not to exceed $30,000. Sufficient funds
to cover all employment taxes will be reserved and adequate
deposits to cover the taxes will be made within two business days
of the issuance of wages;

     (i) The Debtors Comprehensive Cancer Services Oncology, P.C.
and CCS Medical PLLC are authorized to incur and to pay payroll to
employee Frank Catafalmo for services during the week beginning May
28, 2018, but only for 20hoursod work (half of his normal number of
hours) and only in an amount equal to half of the compensation he
normally received for a 40-hour week; and

     (j) Bank of America, N.A., the United States and all Creditors
holding liens on or claims against the cash collateral, are granted
roll-over replacement liens or rights of setoffs as security, to
the same extent, in the same priority, and with respect to the same
assets, which served as collateral for said creditors' prepetition
indebtedness, to the extent of cash collateral actually used during
the pendency of Debtor's Chapter 11 case. Such replacement liens
will attach pro rata to the extent that cash collateral used was
subject to each creditor's respective first priority lien, without
the need of any further public filing or other recordation to
perfect such roll-over or replacement liens or security interests.

To the extent that the replacement liens fail to compensate the
Secured Creditors for the cash collateral use, each of the Secured
Creditors will have, respectively, an administrative claim under 11
U.S.C. Section 507(b) with priority over other expenses of
administration under Section 507(a)(2).

A full-text copy of the Ninth Emergency Order is available at

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb18-10598-156.pdf

                       About CCS Oncology

CCS Oncology and CCS Medical are professional medical practices.
CCS Oncology is the sole member of CCS Medical.  CCS Equipment is
the owner of certain medical equipment used in the medical
practices and CCS Oncology is its sole member.  CCS Billing was
intended to be developed into a separate billing entity for the
medical practices, but was never funded or operational.  CCS
Billing has no assets and has had no activity other than showing a
couple of minimal historical accounting entries.  WSEJ is the owner
of certain real property used by the medical practices.  The
Debtors are headquartered in Orchard Park, New York.

Comprehensive Cancer Services Oncology, P.C., doing business as CCS
Oncology, doing business as CCS Healthcare, along with its
affiliates, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Lead Case
No. 18-10598) on April 2, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Won Sam
Yi, president/CEO, CCS estimated at least $50,000 in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Michael J. Kaplan is the case judge.  

Arthur G. Baumeister, Jr., Esq., of Baumeister Denz LLP, serves as
the Debtors' counsel.


CELESTICA INC: Moody's Assigns Ba2 CFR & Rates $800MM Loans Ba1
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a Ba2 corporate family rating, a
Ba2-PD probability of default rating, and a stable ratings outlook
to Celestica Inc. (Celestica). In conjunction with the company's
launch of a refinancing of its existing credit facilities, Moody's
also assigned a Ba1 (LGD3) rating to Celestica's new $800 million
credit facilities, comprised of a $350 million term loan B due 2025
and a $450 million revolving credit facility due 2023. Moody's also
assigned Celestica an SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating,
indicating very good liquidity arrangements, and a stable ratings
outlook. These are new ratings and are contingent upon Moody's
review of the final transaction and satisfaction that all
parameters substantially conform to pre-closing expectations.

"Celestica's Ba1 rating contextualizes Moody's adjusted leverage of
debt/EBITDA of 1.5X with very low, 5% EBITDA margins that result
from the company's participation is the hyper-competitive and low
growth electronics manufacturing services sector, along with
elevated concentration of revenues with a few key customers," said
Bill Wolfe, a Moody's senior vice president.

The following summarizes Celestica's rating actions:

Rating and Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Celestica Inc.

Corporate Family Rating, Assigned Ba2

Probability of Default Rating, Assigned Ba2-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Assigned SGL-1

Gtd Senior Secured Credit Facilities (Celestica Inc. is the parent
borrower; Celestica International LP and Celestica (USA) Inc. are
co-borrowers), Assigned Ba1 (LGD3)

Outlook, Assigned Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Celestica Inc.'s Ba2 CFR stems primarily from Moody's adjusted
leverage of debt/EBITDA of about 1.5x, about 5% EBITDA margins and
modest growth prospects stemming from the company's participation
in the hyper-competitive electronics manufacturing services sector,
as well as event risks related to elevated concentration of
revenues with a small number of large customers. The company's
credit profile benefits from significant free cash generation that
provides debt reduction flexibility, very good liquidity, a long
track record, and being well positioned to augment growth and
profitability over the next several years by pivoting to adjacent
markets.

Celestica has a SGL-1 speculative grade liquidity rating
(indicating very good liquidity) as a result of approximately $130
million of annual free cash flow generation, ~$465 million in cash
(pro forma for the refinancing transaction at 31Mar18), and the new
unused $450 million revolving credit facility maturing in 2023.
Other than nominal amortization under its new term loan B,
Celestica has no maturing debts, but because the company's $200
million uncommitted accounts receivable securitization facility is
not committed, Moody's assumes that the $113 million of
outstandings are due within its four quarter liquidity horizon.
Even with that, however, the quantum of liquidity remains solid,
and Moody's does not expect financial covenant compliance issues.
There are two financial covenants; Moody's estimates cushions in
excess of 70%, even with the securitization facility backing-up
into the revolving credit facility (covenants of 4x total leverage
and 3.25x interest coverage).

Rating Outlook

The stable outlook is based on expectations of a stable business
platform, with leverage of debt/EBITDA remaining at about 1.5x
(1.6x at 31Mar18, pro forma for the refinance transaction; Moody's
adjustments add about 0.3x to reported figures).

What Could Change the Rating -- Up

Upwards rating pressure is contingent upon positive industry
fundamentals, solid operating performance evidenced by growing
margins, cash flow and scale and much improved customer
concentration, along with adjusted debt/EBITDA being maintained
below 2x on a sustained basis (1.6x at 31Mar18), pro forma for the
refinance transaction.

What Could Change the Rating -- Down

Celestica's rating could be downgraded if adjusted debt/EBITDA
leverage is expected to be sustained above 3x (1.6x at 31Mar18),
pro forma for the refinance transaction, if liquidity deteriorates
markedly, or if financial policies become more aggressive.

Company Profile

Headquartered in Toronto, Ontario and with annual sales of about
$6.2 billion, publicly traded Celestica Inc. is an electronics
manufacturing services (EMS) company providing a full range of
integrated, value-added solutions to original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs).



CELESTICA INC: S&P Affirms 'BB' LT CCR on Proposed Refinancing
--------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'BB' long-term corporate credit
rating on Toronto-based electronic manufacturing service (EMS)
provider Celestica Inc. The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB+' issue-level
rating and '2' recovery rating to the company's proposed US$350
million term loan B due 2025. The '2' recovery rating on the debt
indicates our expectation of substantial (70%-90%; rounded estimate
75%) recovery in the event of default.

The proceeds from the proposed issuance will be used to refinance
Celestica's balance outstanding on the company's US$143 million
revolving credit facility (RCF) and US$175 million term loan A. Pro
forma the transaction, S&P expects the company's adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA to be about 2.2x through 2018. At the same time, the
company is also upsizing its RCF to US$450 million due 2023.

S&P said, "The affirmation reflects our view that the proposed
refinancing transaction is leverage neutral. We expect the
company's adjusted debt-to-EBITDA to be 2.0x-2.5x over the next 12
months, which is almost in line with our previous expectation of
about the low-2.0x area. We expect a slightly higher balance-sheet
debt compared to our previous forecast, driven by lower debt
amortization on the proposed term loan B. In our view, the upsize
on the RCF to US$450 million from US$300 million and extended
maturities on the RCF and term loan enhance Celestica's liquidity
profile. We anticipate the company will use its improved liquidity
to support its inorganic growth strategy and to acquire niche
assets in the diversified end segment, which we view to be
accretive to the company's earnings.

"The stable outlook reflects S&P Global Ratings' expectation that
Celestica will maintain adjusted debt-to-EBITDA below 3x and
FFO-to-debt of more than 30% for the next 12 months. While credit
metrics are significantly stronger than this at present, our rating
incorporates the potential for credit measures to meaningfully
weaken given the risks associated with Celestica's financial
sponsor ownership.

"We could consider a downgrade in the next 12 months if adjusted
debt-to-EBITDA exceeded 3x for a prolonged period. Potential
triggers include the loss of a large customer or program, which
would cause EBITDA to decline meaningfully, or the adoption of a
significantly more aggressive financial policy in terms of
debt-funded shareholder returns and acquisitions.

"We are unlikely to raise the rating over the next 12 months given
highly competitive industry conditions and modest operating scale
along with Celestica's financial sponsor ownership. We would
consider raising the rating if there are material changes in the
company's business risk profile driven by a higher scale and better
profitability level in segments that could produce long-term growth
potential. We could also consider raising the rating if there were
changes to Celestica's ownership structure along with a
well-articulated conservative financial policy."


CENVEO INC: Examiner Finds Potential Claims Against Insiders
------------------------------------------------------------
Susheel Kirpalani, Chapter 11 examiner to Cenveo Inc., et al.,
filed a report disclosing that at all times, the investigations by
the Debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors were
conducted independently and in good faith, and the decision to
curtail further investigation was reasonable, prudent, and reached
with the consent of the Examiner as an exercise of each of their
respective fiduciary duties to stem the continued cost of dual
investigations with examiner oversight for little potential
benefit.

Although three depositions were cancelled in light of a global
settlement, in the Examiner's view, conducting additional
depositions would not have yielded incremental value to the
Debtors' estates and likely would have chilled settlement talks. By
the time of the settlement, the investigations were substantially
complete, the potential recoverable value was ascertainable, and
the parties were well-equipped to negotiate and assess the fairness
of the deal relative to the continued cost and risk of litigation.

The Examiner said he has confidentially reviewed the comprehensive
draft work product from both the Debtors and the Creditors'
Committee pursuant to a common interest agreement and the
conclusions reached by both were reasonable even if divergent in
certain respects.

All potential claims within the scope of the Examiner Appointment
Order were extensively investigated by both the Debtors and the
Creditors' Committee.  A summary of the most viable potential
claims against insiders are as follows:

     Robert Burton, Sr.      $1,900,000
     Michael Burton          $1,014,438
     Robert Burton, Jr.      $1,014,438
     Joseph Burton           $1,487,709

In addition, the Creditors' Committee sharply disagrees with
certain aspects of how the Debtors' business was run
pre-bankruptcy, including how decisions over compensation were
made.  The Examiner does not find this surprising since, after all,
the Debtors are in bankruptcy and the Debtors' largest creditors
have views on how that happened. Not every disagreement with how a
company was run, however, will lead to viable causes of action and
the Examiner was mindful (as were the Debtors and Creditors'
Committee) of the cost-benefit analysis of the continued
exploration of whether the law provides redress for such
grievances.

A full-text copy of the Examiner's Report is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-22178-467.pdf

                      About Cenveo, Inc.

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, Cenveo (OTCPK: CVOVQ) --
http://www.cenveo.com/-- is a global provider of print and related
resources, offering world-class solutions in the areas of custom
labels, envelopes, commercial print, content management and
publisher solutions. The Company provides a one-stop offering
through services ranging from design and content management to
fulfillment and distribution. With a worldwide distribution
platform, the Company says it delivers quality solutions and
services every day to its more than 100,000 customers.

After reaching an agreement with holders of a majority of its first
lien debt to support a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, Cenveo
Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in
White Plains, New York (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-22178) on
Feb. 2, 2018. The Chapter 11 filing does not include foreign
entities, such as those located in India.

As of Dec. 31, 2017, Cenveo disclosed total assets of $789,547,000
and total debt of $1,426,133,000.  The Debtors tapped Kirkland &
Ellis LLP as counsel; Rothschild Inc. as investment banker; Zolfo
Cooper LLC as restructuring advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC as notice,
claims & balloting agent, and administrative advisor.  Greenhill &
Co., LLC, is the co-financial advisor and co-investment banker.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.  The Committee retained
Lowenstein Sandler LLP as its bankruptcy counsel; and FTI
Consulting, Inc. as its financial advisor.


CENVEO INC: July 23 Plan Confirmation Hearing
---------------------------------------------
The hearing at which the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York will consider Confirmation of the amended
joint chapter 11 plan of reorganization will commence on July 23,
2018, at 11:00 a.m., prevailing Eastern Time, before the Honorable
Robert D. Drain.

The deadline for voting on the Plan is on July 13, 2018, at 4:00
p.m., prevailing Eastern Time.  The deadline for filing objections
to the Plan is July 13.

In their amended disclosure statement, the Debtors disclose that
although members of the Ad Hoc First Lien Committee and the Debtors
entered into the Restructuring Support Agreement, the parties were
unable to reach consensus with Brigade Capital Management, LP
before the commencement of the Chapter 11 cases. After the Petition
Date, the Debtors continued engaging in good faith negotiations
with many of their key stakeholders, including, among others, the
Committee, the Allianz Parties, and the Ad Hoc First Lien
Committee. The Plan is the culmination of those discussions and
embodies a settlement of issues between the Debtors, the Committee,
and the Ad Hoc First Lien Committee (the "Global Settlement").
Members of the Ad Hoc First Lien Committee have entered into the
Restructuring Support Agreement to support the Debtors'
restructuring. Additionally, the Allianz Parties have executed an
amendment to the Restructuring Support Agreement in support of the
Plan. As such, the Plan has the support of the Committee (including
PBGC and its union members), the Allianz Parties, and the Ad Hoc
First Lien Committee. The components of the Global Settlement
include, among other things:

   * Members assumption of the U.S. Qualified Pension Plan
obligations;

   * assumption of the unexpired Collective Bargaining Agreements;

   * assumption of the unexpired lease in connection with the
Debtors' corporate headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut, as
amended;

   * establishment of a $7 million General Unsecured Claims Cash
Pool (which was increased from $1.5 million under the original
Plan), payable over two years after the Effective Date;

   * appointment of a Claims Oversight Monitor, who will oversee
the claims objection process and the reimbursement of up to
$100,000 of fees and expenses of the Claims Oversight Monitor
(provided that any costs in excess of the $100,000 will be paid
from the General Unsecured Claims Cash Pool);

   * payment of $400,000 to the Unsecured Notes Indenture Trustee
for its substantial contribution to these Chapter 11 Cases and the
Estates;

   * waiver of the deficiency claim for the Holders of the First
Lien Notes Claims;

   * waiver and release of all Avoidance Actions arising under
chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code or any comparable action arising
under applicable of non-bankruptcy law against trade vendors and
noninsider landlords of the Debtors;

   * the Committee's support of the Plan and encouragement of
creditors through the Committee Support Letter to vote to accept
the plan;

   * the Debtors' and the Committee's Investigations will cease,
and the Examiner will submit a report after reviewing the
Debtors’ and the Committee's respective draft reports;

   * the New Second Lien Debt will be decreased from at least $200
million to $100 million;

   * the Debtors will provide Debtor Releases in favor of current
and former directors and officers, as well as Robert G. Burton, Sr.
and related family members and their entities; and

   * the right for Holders of Second Lien Notes Claims to receive
and retain proceeds of cash collateral under the Plan
notwithstanding the applicability of the Second Lien Intercreditor
Agreement.

The latest plan provides for the treatment of the following
prepetition claims:

First Lien Notes Claims: Each Holder of such claim will receive its
Pro Rata share of, as applicable: (i) Cash proceeds of the
Additional Exit Financing (if any); (ii) the New Second Lien Debt
(unless substituted in whole, but not in part, with Cash proceeds
received from any Additional Exit Financing; and (iii) [100% of
Reorganized Cenveo Equity Interests, subject to dilution by the
Management Incentive Plan.

FILO Notes Claims: Each Holder of such claim will receive, its Pro
Rata share of: (i) payment in full in Cash of the FILO Notes
Claims; and (ii) payment of the reasonable and documented fees and
expenses of legal counsel, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, solely in
its capacity as counsel to Holders of the FILO Notes Claims,
incurred through and including the Effective Date, and the
Reorganized Debtors, as applicable, and the Ad Hoc First Lien
Committee will have 10 calendar days from the date of receipt of
any such summary invoice to object to any such FILO Professional
Fees and Expenses based upon reasonableness, and absent a timely
objection interposed within such ten-day period, such FILO
Professional Fees and Expenses shall be promptly paid by the
Reorganized Debtors; provided, however, that to the extent an
objection is timely interposed, the Bankruptcy Court will determine
the allowed amount of the FILO Professional Fees and Expenses, and
after allowance by the Bankruptcy Court, will be promptly paid by
the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, as applicable; provided,
further, however, that the FILO Professional Fees and Expenses
shall not exceed $275,000 in the aggregate.

General Unsecured Claims and Second Lien Notes Claims: Each Holder
of such claim will receive its Pro Rata share of the General
Unsecured Claims Recovery Cash Pool.

A Redlined Version of the Disclosure Statement dated June 8, 2018,
is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-22178-475.pdf

A Redlined Version of the Disclosure Statement dated June 5, 2018
is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb18-22178-452.pdf

                    About Cenveo, Inc.

Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, Cenveo (NASDAQ:CVO) --
http://www.cenveo.com/-- is a global provider of print and related
resources, offering world-class solutions in the areas of custom
labels, envelopes, commercial print, content management and
publisher solutions.  The Company provides a one-stop offering
through services ranging from design and content management to
fulfillment and distribution.  With a worldwide distribution
platform, the Company says it delivers quality solutions and
services every day to its more than 100,000 customers.

After reaching an agreement with holders of a majority of its first
lien debt to support a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, Cenveo
Inc. and its domestic subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in
White Plains, New York (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-22178) on
Feb. 2, 2018.  The Chapter 11 filing does not include foreign
entities, such as those located in India.

As of Dec. 31, 2017, Cenveo disclosed total assets of $789,547,000
and total debt of $1,426,133,000.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as counsel; Rothschild Inc.
as investment banker; Zolfo Cooper LLC as restructuring advisor;
and Prime Clerk LLC as notice, claims & balloting agent, and
administrative advisor.  Greenhill & Co., LLC, as co-financial
advisor and co-investment banker.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.  The committee hired
Lowenstein Sandler LLP as its bankruptcy counsel; and FTI
Consulting, Inc., as its financial advisor.


CHANA TAUB: Lawyer Not Entitled to Charging Lien, Court Rules
-------------------------------------------------------------
Upon an application brought on by order to show cause and made
returnable before the court on Jan. 5, 2018, David Bellon, Esq.
moved for a charging lien against Chana Taub pursuant to Judiciary
Law section 475, which he claims he has in and against the
distributive award Ms. Taub received in the order and judgment made
in the case captioned CHANA TAUB, Plaintiff, v. SIMON TAUB,
Defendant, 26534/2007 (N.Y. Sup.).

Upon due consideration of Mr. Bellon's moving papers, the Supreme
Court records, and the parties' oral argument, the Kings County
Supreme Court determines that the application is denied in all
respects.

Mr. Bellon has moved the court to fix and enforce a charging lien
and claims that he is entitled to an account and that the amount
due him is already established to be $1,199,971. Accordingly, he
indicates that no hearing is necessary to fix the amount of the
charging lien and that he should be awarded a money judgment
thereon in that amount. Additionally and lastly, Mr. Bellon is
requesting that the court issue a temporary restraining order
enjoining and restraining Ms. Taub and her agents from transferring
any real property until his lien is satisfied.

The Court holds that Mr. Bellon's application, seeking to recover
against Ms. Taub's divorce judgment proceeds, fails for the simple
but inescapable fact that he did not represent her in those
proceedings. At no point in time, from May 2010 through to the
present, was the movant ever counsel of record, nor did he ever
represent Ms. Taub in the matrimonial action before the court;
additionally, with the exception of the instant motion, Mr. Bellon
filed no pleadings, briefs, motions or other papers in this
action.

Since Mr. Bellon did not appear as attorney of record in this
matter, and also never filed a notice of lien pursuant to Judiciary
Law section 475-a (and would have had no basis to do so), he is not
entitled to a charging lien under the Judiciary Law.

In the matter sub judice the court finds that Mr. Bellon is not
entitled to an attorney's lien under Judiciary Law section 475 and
therefore, to pursue such claims as he may have for the recovery of
attorney's fees, he must bring a plenary action, before an
appropriate forum, not the matrimonial court.

A full-text copy of the Court's Order dated May 11, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2kYFRvl from Leagle.com.

David Bellon, Esq., pro se -- Non-party movant/petitioner.

Chana Taub, pro se -- Plaintiff/respondent on the petition.

                    About Chana Taub

Chana Taub filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
08-44210) on July 1, 2008, and is represented by Dennis W. Houdek,
Esq., in Manhattan.  Mrs. Taub's chapter 11 case has been
hallmarked by waves of thermonuclear litigation with her estranged
husband.  In April 2010, the Honorable Elizabeth S. Stong appointed
a Chapter 11 trustee.  Lori Lapin Jones, Esq., at Lori Lapin Jones,
PLLC, in Great Neck, N.Y., serves as the Chapter 11 Trustee, and
Ms. Jones is represented by Ronald J. Friedman, Esq., at
SilvermanAcampora LLP.


CHARLOTTE RUSSE: Moody's Assigns Caa1 CFR & Rates $90MM Loan Caa1
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned Charlotte Russe, Inc. a
Corporate Family Rating (CFR) and Probability of Default (PDR)
rating of Caa1 and Caa1-PD, respectively. Concurrently, Moody's
assigned a Caa1 rating to the company's $90 million principal
senior secured term loan. The ratings outlook is stable.

"Charlotte Russe has experienced negative same store sales comps
that have accelerated over the last two quarters, largely the
result of product missteps and traffic declines, but also resulting
from inventory timing issues stemming from the company's February
2018 debt restructuring", said Moody's Vice President and lead
analyst for the company Brian Silver. "Although we expect Charlotte
Russe to continue to face headwinds in a difficult retail
environment, with the debt restructuring now behind them the
company will have some tailwinds relative to last year, including a
lower interest expense burden, reduced store rent expense resulting
from renegotiated leases, and a gradual easing of its tightened
vendor terms that are ultimately expected to lead to more healthy
inventory replenishment and breakeven to moderately positive free
cash flow generation over the next 12-18 months."

The following ratings have been assigned for Charlotte Russe,
Inc.:

Corporate Family Rating of Caa1

Probability of Default Rating of Caa1-PD

$90 million Gtd Senior Secured Term Loan due 2023 of Caa1 (LGD4)

Outlook action:

Outlook, assigned stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Charlotte Russe's credit profile is broadly constrained by ongoing
headwinds growing its topline and profitability, owing largely to
store closures together with same store sales declines from the
highly competitive retail environment. In addition, the company has
weak interest coverage as measured by EBIT-to-interest expense,
which is below 1 time for the twelve months ended May 5, 2018 (the
LTM period). The company also has relatively low operating margins,
and while its entry into the value beauty category will help
increase brand awareness, it also presents risks associated with
entrance into a new category.

Charlotte Russe's credit profile benefits from Moody's expectation
that it will maintain an adequate liquidity profile over the next
twelve months, supported by access to its ABL and a lack of
near-term debt maturities, and Moody's expectation the company will
generate breakeven to moderately positive free cash flow over the
next 12-18 months. The company's leverage is elevated but moderate
for the rating at about 4.9 times debt-to-EBITDA for the LTM
period. Charlotte Russe will benefit from the realization of $15
million of budgeted annualized cost savings, including benefits
from rent reduction and reduced store and corporate operating
expenses, which together with lower interest expense following its
debt restructuring will help buoy cash flow generation in the face
of topline pressure.

The Caa1 rating assigned to the company's senior secured term loan
is in line with the CFR since this loan represents the
preponderance of funded debt. The term loan matures in February
2023 and has a 2nd lien position on the company's accounts
receivable and inventory (ranking junior to the $80 million unrated
asset-based revolver) and a 1st lien on substantially all other
assets of the borrower. Charlotte Russe leases substantially all of
its locations, therefore the company does not have meaningful real
estate holdings.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that the company's
same store sales comps, leverage, and profitability will moderately
improve over the next 12-18 months. It also reflects Moody's
expectation that the company will remain reliant on its asset-based
revolving facility ("ABL").

The ratings could be downgraded if operating performance worsens or
fails to improve resulting in a weakened liquidity profile as
evidenced by increasing reliance on its ABL facility.
Alternatively, the ratings could be upgraded if Charlotte Russe is
able to achieve and maintain positive same store sales comps,
sustain its interest coverage (EBIT-to-interest) above 1.0 time,
and improve its liquidity as evidenced by reduced reliance on its
ABL.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in May 2018.

Headquartered in San Francisco, CA, Charlotte Russe, Inc. is a
retailer of value-oriented 'fast fashion' apparel, footwear and
accessories. The company targets 18-24 year old women and its key
item categories include denim, dresses and shoes. Charlotte Russe
also entered the beauty category in April 2018 with the launch of
its "Charlotte by Charlotte Russe" beauty line. As of May 5, 2018,
the company operated 539 retail stores in the US and Puerto Rico
and generated sales through its e-commerce and mobile platforms.
The company is primarily owned by its former term loan holders
following its February 2018 out-of-court debt restructuring.
Revenue for the twelve month period ended May 5, 2018 was
approximately $902 million.


CK ASSISTED: Unsecureds to Get $20K Plus Interest at 3% Per Annum
-----------------------------------------------------------------
CK Assisted Living of Arizona, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Arizona a disclosure statement in support
of its plan of reorganization.

The Debtor operates an assisted living facility for elderly and
disabled individuals in Prescott, Arizona.

The business operations of the Debtor were purchased from Michael
and Kim Kenyons in February 2016. Capital Fund 1, LLC financed the
purchase and possesses a first position Deed of Trust on the real
property at 6336 N. Pottery Place, Prescott, Arizona with a present
balance of approximately $375,000. The balance of the purchase
price of the business operations from the Kenyons is evidenced by a
carry-back Promissory Note in favor of Kenyons secured by a second
position Deed of Trust on the Real Property in an amount
approximating $78,000 and a lien on the personal property in an
amount approximating $182,000.

The Debtor will pay unsecured creditors with valid and proven
claims a total amount of $20,000 on a prorata basis. Such amount
will be paid $4,000 six months from the date of confirmation and
every five months thereafter until the total of $20,000 plus
interest at 3% per annum, have been paid. Any secured personal
property claim of Knight Capital, LCF Group or Small Business
Funding will be treated as unsecured as there is no value to the
collateral positions of the creditors due to the lien of Kenyons on
the personal property of the Debtor. The Debtor believes that
unsecured creditors having valid and proven claims will receive
approximately 10% of said claim.

The funds necessary to effectuate consummation of the plan of
reorganization will derive from business revenues received by the
Debtor and the new money being contributed by the owner.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb2-18-01882-58.pdf

             About CK Assisted Living of Arizona

CK Assisted Living of Arizona, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-01882) on
Feb. 28, 2018.  The petition was signed by Steven Walski, manager.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$1 million and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge Daniel P.
Collins presides over the case. Carmichael & Powell, P.C., is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case of CK Assisted Living of Arizona LLC as of
March 26, according to a court docket.


CLINICA SANTA ROSA: July 19 Disclosure Statement Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------
Judge Edward A Godoy of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Puerto Rico will convene a hearing to consider approval of the
disclosure statement filed by Clinica Santa Rosa Inc.  July 19,
2018 at 9:30 A.M. is fixed for the hearing on approval of
disclosure statement.

Class 2 Secured Claim is comprised of USDA Rural Development within
which classifies the amount of $13,861,820.08 Upon confirmation of
the plan, the Debtor will transfer to Mennonite General Hospital,
Inc., a real property and equipment over which Rural holds a
secured interest. Rural will be paid $2,400,000.00.

Class 3, Secured Claim is comprised of U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development filed the amount of $1,027,868.84.

Class 4, Secured Creditor, is comprosed of Hospital Menonita
Guayama, Inc., filed an amount of $2,164.336.00, of which
$1,059,354 were filed as secured amount

Class 7, General Unsecured Creditors will receive a lump sum
payment of a total amount of $20,000 on the effective date of the
plan.

The means of execution of the plan is that Hospital General
Menonita Inc. will provide said funds in order to obtain all rights
over Debtor's assets.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb16-09033-261.pdf

                  About Clinica Santa Rosa

Clinica Santa Rosa, Inc., engaged in a healthcare business, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-09033) on Nov. 14,
2016.  The petition was signed by Fernando Alarcon Ocasio,
president.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets
at $1 million to $10 million and liabilities $10 million to $50
million.

The Debtor is represented by Antonio I. Hernandez Santiago, Esq.

The U.S. Trustee for the District of Puerto Rico appointed Edna
Diaz De Jesus and the Patient Care Ombudsman for Clinica Santa
Rosa.


COBRA WELL: Taps Markus Williams as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Cobra Well Testers, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Wyoming to hire Markus Williams Young &
Zimmermann LLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; and provide other legal services related to its
Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge at these hourly rates:

     Bradley Hunsicker            $310
     Matthew Faga                 $315
     John Young                   $425
     Paralegals               $135 to $165

Markus Williams received retainers totaling $43,500.

Bradley Hunsicker, Esq., at Markus Williams, disclosed in a court
filing that he and other professionals at his firm do not represent
any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate.

Markus Williams can be reached through:

     Bradley T. Hunsicker, Esq.
     Matthew T. Faga, Esq.
     Markus Williams Young & Zimmermann LLC
     106 East Lincolnway, Suite 300
     Cheyenne, WY 82001
     Telephone: 307-778-8178
     Facsimile: 307-638-1975
     E-mail: bhunsicker@markuswilliams.com
     E-mail: mfaga@markuswilliams.com  

                    About Cobra Well Testers

Cobra Well Testers, LLC, provides high pressure well testing
services to the oil and gas industry.  It was established in 1999
to initially service the Muddy Ridge gas field in Western Wyoming.
Since then, the company has expanded to complete work in multiple
oil and gas basins throughout the Rockies.

Cobra Well Testers sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Wyo. Case No. 18-20449) on May 31, 2018.
In the petition signed by Yavette Bailey, member, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.  

Judge Cathleen D. Parker presides over the case.


COLORADO LONESOME: Taps Brokerage Real Estate as Real Estate Broker
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Colorado Lonesome Dove, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ
Steven L. Weinberg and The Brokerage Real Estate as real estate
broker.

Services to be provided by The Brokerage Real Estate are:

     a. perform the terms of any written or oral agreement with the
Debtor;

     b. present all offers to and from Debtor in a timely manner
regardless of whether the property is subject to a contract of
sale;

     c. disclose the Debtor adverse material facts actually known
by Broker;

     d. advise the Debtor regarding the transaction and advise the
debtor to obtain expert advice as to material matters about which
Broker knows but the specifics of which are beyond the expertise of
broker;

     e. account in a timely matter for all money and property
received; and

     f. keep the debtor informed regarding the transaction.

The Broker the will receive sales commission equal to 10% of the
gross purchase price.

Steven L. Weinberg, broker at The Brokerage Real Estate, attests
that his firm does not hold any interest adverse to the Debtor's
estate and believes that it is a disinterested person as defined
within 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The broker can be reached through:

     Steven L. Weinberg
     THE BROKERAGE REAL ESTAE
     1954 Stone Canyon Court
     Grand Junction, CO 81507
     Tel: 970-245-7070
     Email: stevenlweinberg@resorts-the brokerage.net

                 About Colorado Lonesome Dove

Goodnight's Lonesome Dove RV Campground & Cabins --
https://is.gd/SuWgTP -- is a recreational camp located at 180065 US
Hwy 160 South Fork, CO 81154.  Goodnight's Lonesome Dove RV
Campground & Cabins has year-round family activities for the sports
enthusiast and nature lover alike.  The Camp is convenient to
skiing, hiking, fishing, horseback riding, rafting, biking, or just
relaxing.  It has 10 log cabins open year-round, each with private
bathrooms and fully equipped kitchens.  It also has 37 Large,
full-hookup, RV sites that are all grassy and are available May
through Mid-November with a full laundry and shower facility.

Colorado Lonesome Dove, LLC, d/b/a Goodnight's Lonesome Dove RV
Campground & Cabins, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla.
Case No. 18-13283) on March 22, 2018.  The petition was signed by
Brian G. West, manager/member.  The case is assigned to Judge Erik
P. Kimball.  The Debtor is represented by Latham, Shuker, Eden &
Beaudine, LLP, as counsel.  At the time of filing, the Debtor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.


COMMUNITY HEALTH: Extends Exchange Offers Expiration Until June 19
------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Health Systems, Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary,
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc., has amended certain terms of
its previously commenced offers to exchange (i) up to $1,925
million aggregate principal amount of its new Junior-Priority
Secured Notes due 2023 in exchange for any and all of its $1,925
million aggregate principal amount of outstanding 8.000% Senior
Unsecured Notes due 2019, (ii) up to $1,200 million aggregate
principal amount of its new 8.125% Junior-Priority Secured Notes
due 2024 in exchange for any and all of its $1,200 million
aggregate principal amount of outstanding 7.125% Senior Unsecured
Notes due 2020 and (iii) to the extent that less than all of the
outstanding 2019 Notes and 2020 Notes are tendered in the Exchange
Offers, up to an aggregate principal amount of 2024 Notes equal to,
when taken together with the New Notes issued in exchange for the
validly tendered and accepted 2019 Notes and 2020 Notes, $3,125
million, in exchange for its outstanding 6.875% Senior Unsecured
Notes due 2022.  The maximum aggregate principal amount of New
Notes issued in the Exchange Offers will not exceed $3,125
million.

The amendments to the Exchange Offers (i) increase the interest
rate on the 2023 Notes by 1.125% per annum, from 9.875% to 11.000%
per annum, solely for the period from the issue date of such 2023
Notes to, but excluding, the one year anniversary thereof, (ii)
modify the negative covenants that will be applicable to the New
Notes to prohibit the Issuer from purchasing, repurchasing,
redeeming, defeasing or otherwise acquiring or retiring any
outstanding 2019 Notes or 2020 Notes after the consummation of the
Exchange Offers with cash or cash equivalents presently on hand,
cash from operations, with proceeds from assets sales or with
proceeds from the issuance of, or in exchange for, secured debt
prior to the date that is 60 days prior to the relevant maturity
dates of such 2019 Notes or 2020 Notes, as applicable, and (iii)
extend the "Early Tender Deadline" and the "Expiration Date" for
each Exchange Offer.

The Issuer was advised by the exchange agent for the Exchange
Offers that, as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on June 5, 2018,
a total of (i) $1,547,516,000 aggregate principal amount of
outstanding 2019 Notes, representing approximately 80% of the
outstanding 2019 Notes, (ii) $960,183,000 aggregate principal
amount of outstanding 2020 Notes, representing approximately 80% of
the outstanding 2020 Notes, and (iii) $2,829,013,000 aggregate
principal amount of outstanding 2022 Notes, representing
approximately 94% of the outstanding 2022 Notes, were validly
tendered (and not validly withdrawn) in the Exchange Offers.
Because the aggregate principal amount of Old Notes validly
tendered as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on June 5, 2018
would, if accepted for exchange, cause the Maximum Exchange Amount
to be exceeded, pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Offer,
tenders of 2022 Notes accepted for exchange will be subject to
proration.

The "Expiration Date" and the "Early Tender Deadline" for each
Exchange Offer has been extended from 5:00 p.m., New York City
time, on Friday, June 8, 2018 to midnight, New York City time, at
the end of the day on Tuesday, June 19, 2018.  As a result, the
deadline for tendering Old Notes in order to receive the total
consideration of (i) $1,000 principal amount of 2023 Notes
(including the increased interest rate described in this press
release) per $1,000 principal amount of 2019 Notes tendered and
accepted for exchange, (ii) $1,000 principal amount of 2024 Notes
per $1,000 principal amount of 2020 Notes tendered and accepted for
exchange and (iii) $750 principal amount of 2024 Notes per $1,000
principal amount of 2022 Notes tendered and accepted for exchange
is now midnight, New York City time, at the end of the day on
Tuesday, June 19, 2018.  The tender withdrawal deadline has passed.
Accordingly, tenders of Old Notes may no longer be withdrawn.

The Exchange Offers remain subject to the conditions set forth in
the Offering Memorandum, dated May 4, 2018 and related Letter of
Transmittal, dated May 4, 2018, including the condition that at
least 90% of the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the 2019
Notes are tendered in the Exchange Offers.  As of 5:00 p.m., New
York City time, on June 5, 2018, the Minimum Tender Amount
Condition has not been satisfied.  The Issuer reserves the right,
subject to applicable law, to terminate, withdraw or amend each
Exchange Offer at any time and from time to time, as described in
the Offering Memorandum.

Pursuant to the terms of the exchange agreement between the Issuer
and certain institutional investors that are holders of Old Notes,
any amendment or waiver of the Minimum Tender Amount Condition
requires prior written consent of such holders and there can be no
assurance such amendment or waiver will be granted.

Each series of New Notes will be guaranteed by the Company and
certain of its existing and future domestic subsidiaries that
guarantee the Issue's outstanding senior secured credit facilities,
ABL facility and senior notes.  In addition, each series of New
Notes and related guarantees will be secured by (i) second-priority
liens on the collateral that secures on a first-priority basis the
Issuer's outstanding senior secured credit facilities (subject to
certain exceptions) and existing secured notes and (ii)
third-priority liens on the collateral that secures on a
first-priority basis the Issuer's outstanding ABL facility, in each
case subject to permitted liens described in the Offering
Memorandum.

The New Notes have not been registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended or any state securities laws.  The New Notes may
not be offered or sold in the United States or to any U.S. persons
except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not
subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act.
The Exchange Offers are being made, and each series of New Notes
are being offered and issued only (i) in the United States to
holders of Old Notes who the Issuer reasonably believes are
"qualified institutional buyers" (as defined in Rule 144A under the
Securities Act) and (ii) outside the United States to holders of
Old Notes who are (A) persons other than U.S. persons, within the
meaning of Regulation S under the Securities Act, and (B) "non-U.S.
qualified offerees".

The complete terms and conditions of the Exchange Offers are set
forth in the Offering Memorandum and related Letter of Transmittal.
Copies of the Offering Memorandum and Letter of Transmittal may be
obtained from Global Bondholder Services Corporation, the exchange
agent and information agent for the Exchange Offers, at (866)
470-3800 (toll free) or (212) 430-3774 (collect).

                      About Community Health

Community Health -- http://www.chs.net/-- is a publicly-traded
hospital company in the United States and an operator of general
acute care hospitals and outpatient facilities in communities
across the country.  Community Health was originally founded in
1986 and was reincorporated in 1996 as a Delaware corporation.  The
Company provides healthcare services through the hospitals that it
owns and operates and affiliated businesses in non-urban and
selected urban markets throughout the United States.  As of Dec.
31, 2017, the Company owned or leased 125 hospitals included in
continuing operations, with an aggregate of 20,850 licensed beds,
comprised of 123 general acute care hospitals and two stand-alone
rehabilitation or psychiatric hospitals.  Community Health is
headquartered in Franklin, Tennessee.

Community Health reported a net loss of $2.39 billion on $15.35
billion of net operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss of $1.62 billion on $18.43 billion of net
operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March
31, 2018, Community Health had $17.31 billion in total assets,
$17.48 billion in total liabilities, $523 million in redeemable
non-controlling interests in equity of consolidated subsidiaries
and a total stockholders' deficit of $701 million.

                           *    *    *

In May 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating
on Community Health Systems to 'CCC-' from 'CCC+' and placed the
rating on CreditWatch with negative implications.  The CreditWatch
negative status reflects the possible distressed exchange of the
unsecured notes due in 2022.

In May 2018, Fitch Ratings downgraded Community Health Systems'
(CHS) Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'C' from 'CCC' following the
company's announcement of an offer to exchange three series of
senior unsecured notes due 2019, 2020 and 2022.


COMPREHENSIVE CANCER: Trustee Hires Chiampou Travis as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark J. Schlant, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Comprehensive Cancer
Services Oncology, P.C., and its debtor-affiliates, seeks authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York
to employ Chiampou Travis Besaw & Kershner, LLP, as accountant to
the Trustee.

The Trustee requires Chiampou Travis to:

   a) assist in the organization of, and to support, the
      remaining employees of the Debtors who are performing
      billing and collection services with respect to the
      Debtors' accounts receivable, and accounting with respect
      to those accounts receivable and their collection;

   b) assist the Trustee preparing reports based on the income
      and expenses of the Debtors; and

   c) prepare income tax returns for the Debtors to the extent
      required.

Chiampou Travis will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                   $300
     Managers                   $145
     Seniors                    $140
     Staffs                     $95

Chiampou Travis will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Kelly Besaw, partner of Chiampou Travis Besaw & Kershner, LLP,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

Chiampou Travis can be reached at:

     Kelly Besaw
     CHIAMPOU TRAVIS BESAW & KERSHNER, LLP
     45 Bryant Woods N
     Amherst, NY 14228
     Tel: (716) 630-2400

                       About CCS Oncology

Headquartered in Orchard Park, New York, CCS Oncology is a
professional corporation operating a practice of medical and
radiological oncology treatment, with offices in Orchard Park,
Frankhauser, Niagra Falls, Kenmore, and Lockport.  CSS Medical PLLC
is a provider of primary care and specialty medicine services
currently operating at Orchard Park, Delaware Avenue, and Youngs.

Comprehensive Cancer Services Oncology, P.C., doing business as CCS
Oncology, doing business as CCS Healthcare, along with its
affiliates, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Lead Case
No. 18-10598) on April 2, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Won Sam
Yi, president/CEO, CCS estimated at least $50,000 in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Michael J. Kaplan is the case judge.  

Arthur G. Baumeister, Jr., Esq., of Baumeister Denz LLP, serves as
the Debtors' counsel.

Mark Schlant has been named the Chapter 11 trustee.  The Trustee
hired Zdarsky Sawicki & Agostinelli LLP, as counsel.

Joseph J. Tomaino of Grassi Healthcare Advisors LLC has been
appointed as patient care ombudsman.


COMPREHENSIVE CANCER: Trustee Hires Zdarsky Sawicki as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark J. Schlant, the Chapter 11 trustee of Comprehensive Cancer
Services Oncology, P.C., and its debtor-affiliates, seeks authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York
to employ Zdarsky Sawicki & Agostinelli LLP, as counsel to the
Trustee.

The Trustee requires Zdarsky Sawicki to:

   a. give legal advice to the Trustee with respect to his rights
      and duties;

   b. prepare on behalf of the Trustee all applications,
      responses, orders, reports, and other legal papers
      necessary in the bankruptcy proceedings;

   c. represent the Trustee with respect to applications for the
      use of cash collateral;

   d. represent the Trustee with respect to arrangements for the
      use or sale of property of the estates, should the
      opportunity to do so arise;

   e. represent the Trustee with respect to actions to avoid
      transfers pursuant to Chapter 5 of the Bankruptcy Code;

   f. perform all other legal services to the Trustee which may
      be necessary in the bankruptcy proceedings.

Zdarsky Sawicki will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys              $140 to $375
     Paralegals              $50 to $55

Zdarsky Sawicki will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Mark J. Schlant, at partner of Zdarsky Sawicki, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Zdarsky Sawicki can be reached at:

     Mark J. Schlant, Esq.
     ZDARSKY SAWICKI & AGOSTINELLI LLP
     1600 Main Place Tower, 350 Main Street
     Buffalo, NY 14202
     Tel: (716) 855-3200

                       About CCS Oncology

Headquartered in Orchard Park, New York, CCS Oncology is a
professional corporation operating a practice of medical and
radiological oncology treatment, with offices in Orchard Park,
Frankhauser, Niagra Falls, Kenmore, and Lockport.  CSS Medical PLLC
is a provider of primary care and specialty medicine services
currently operating at Orchard Park, Delaware Avenue, and Youngs.

Comprehensive Cancer Services Oncology, P.C., doing business as CCS
Oncology, doing business as CCS Healthcare, along with its
affiliates, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Lead Case
No. 18-10598) on April 2, 2018.  In the petitions signed by Won Sam
Yi, president/CEO, CCS estimated at least $50,000 in assets and $10
million to $50 million in liabilities.

Judge Michael J. Kaplan is the case judge.  

Arthur G. Baumeister, Jr., Esq., of Baumeister Denz LLP, serves as
the Debtors' counsel.

Mark Schlant has been named the Chapter 11 trustee.  The Trustee
hired Zdarsky Sawicki & Agostinelli LLP, as counsel.

Joseph J. Tomaino of Grassi Healthcare Advisors LLC has been
appointed as patient care ombudsman.


CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Extends Early Consent Deadline to June 12
------------------------------------------------------------------
Concordia International Corp. said that the Company's previously
announced recapitalization transaction to be implemented pursuant
to a plan of arrangement under the Canada Business Corporations Act
in Concordia's proceedings under the CBCA has received the
requisite level of debtholder approvals as provided for in the
interim order of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dated May 2,
2018 with votes in respect of approximately 99.7% of the
outstanding principal amount of the Company's affected secured debt
and approximately 97.1% of the outstanding principal amount of the
Company's affected unsecured debt having been cast in favour of the
approval of the CBCA Plan.

In order to provide all remaining debtholders with an extended
opportunity to receive the applicable early consent consideration
in connection with the Recapitalization Transaction, the Company is
extending the deadline for eligibility for holders of Secured Debt
and holders of Unsecured Debt to receive the applicable Early
Consent Consideration from 5:00 p.m. Toronto time on June 6, 2018
to 5:00 p.m. Toronto time on June 12, 2018.

In order for Secured Debtholders and Unsecured Debtholders to be
eligible to receive the applicable Early Consent Consideration,
such Secured Debtholders and Unsecured Debtholders must submit a
vote in favour of the CBCA Plan by the Early Consent Date of 5:00
p.m. Toronto time on June 12, 2018, as such date may be extended by
Concordia, except as otherwise provided in the Interim Order, and
satisfy the other applicable requirements under the Interim Order
and the CBCA Plan.  Further information on the Early Consent
Consideration is described in the management information circular
dated May 15, 2018 for the special meetings of the Secured
Debtholders and the Unsecured Debtholders, and the annual and
special meeting of shareholders of Concordia to be held on
June 19, 2018.

Banks, brokers or other intermediaries that hold the Secured Debt
and Unsecured Debt on behalf of Secured Debtholders and Unsecured
Debtholders, respectively, may have internal deadlines that require
Secured Debtholders and Unsecured Debtholders to submit their votes
by an earlier date in advance of the Early Consent Date in order to
be eligible to receive the applicable Early Consent Consideration.
Secured Debtholders and Unsecured Debtholders are encouraged to
contact their intermediaries directly to confirm any such internal
deadline.

Holders of the Company's secured term loans that are entitled to
elect the type of new senior secured debt they will receive
pursuant to the CBCA Plan, and Secured Debtholders that are
entitled to receive new senior secured term loans pursuant to the
CBCA Plan and that are eligible to elect the currency of such new
senior secured term loans, are reminded that the deadline for
making such elections is 5:00 p.m. Toronto time on June 28, 2018.
Further information on these elections is contained in the
Circular.

The press release issued on May 2, 2018, announcing the
Recapitalization Transaction, the Interim Order, the Circular, and
certain other materials relating to the Recapitalization
Transaction are available on the Company's website at
www.concordiarx.com, the Company’s SEDAR and EDGAR profiles
and/or on Kingsdale Advisors’ website at
http://www.kingsdaleadvisors.com/concordiadocuments.html.
Any questions or requests for further information regarding
eligibility for Early Consent Consideration and/or the elections to
be made pursuant to the CBCA Plan should be directed to Kingsdale
Advisors at 1-866-581-0506 or 416-867-2272, by email at
contactus@kingsdaleadvisors.com.

                         Court Approval

If the CBCA Plan is approved by the requisite majorities at the
Debtholder Meetings, the Company and its subsidiary, Concordia
Healthcare (Canada) Limited, will attend a hearing before the Court
currently scheduled for June 26, 2018 or such other date as may be
set by the Court, to seek Court approval of the CBCA Plan.  As part
of the Court approval of the Recapitalization Transaction, the
Company will seek a permanent waiver of any and all: (a) defaults
resulting from the commencement of these CBCA proceedings, and (b)
third party change of control provisions that may be triggered by
the implementation of the Recapitalization Transaction.

                         About Concordia

Based in Ontario, Canada, Concordia -- http://www.concordiarx.com/
-- is an international specialty pharmaceutical company with a
diversified portfolio of more than 200 patented and off-patent
products, and sales in more than 90 countries.  Going forward, the
Company is focused on becoming a leader in European specialty,
off-patent medicines.  Concordia operates out of facilities in
Oakville, Ontario and, through its subsidiaries, operates out
facilities in Oakville, Ontario and, through its subsidiaries,
operates out of facilities in Bridgetown, Barbados; London, England
and Mumbai, India.

Concordia reported a net loss of US$1.59 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of US$1.31 billion for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Concordia had
US$2.32 billion in total assets, US$4.30 billion in total
liabilities and a total shareholders' deficit of US$1.97 billion.

                           *    *    *

Moody's Investors Service downgraded the Corporate Family Rating of
Concordia to 'Ca' from 'Caa3'.  "Concordia's Ca Corporate Family
Rating reflects its very high financial leverage, ongoing operating
headwinds, and imminent risk of a debt restructuring.  Moody's
estimates adjusted debt/EBITDA will exceed 9.0x over the next 12
months as earnings decline on a year over year basis," as reported
by the TCR on Oct. 27, 2017.

In October 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Concordia to 'SD' from 'CCC-' and removed the rating from
CreditWatch, where it was placed with negative implications on
Sept. 18, 2017.  "The downgrade follows Concordia International's
announcement that it failed to make the Oct. 16, 2016, interest
payment on the 7% senior unsecured notes due 2023.  Given our view
of the company's debt level as unsustainable, and ongoing
restructuring discussions, we do not expect the company to make a
payment within the grace period."


COURTSIDE CONDOMINIUMS: Hires Holland & Hart LLP as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Courtside Condominiums, LC, seeks authority from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah (Salt Lake City) Holland
& Hart LLP as counsel.

Legal services H&H will render are:

     (a) prepare on behalf of the Debtor any necessary motions,
applications, answers orders, reports and papers as required by
applicable bankruptcy or nonbankruptcy law, dictated by the demands
of the case, or required by the Court, and to represent the Debtor
in proceedings or hearings related thereto;

     (b) provide advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers
and duties as a debtor in possession in the continued conduct of
its business;

     (c) negotiate with creditors of the Debtor and other
parties-in-interest in developing a plan of reorganization and/or
liquidation, and taking any necessary steps to obtain confirmation
of, and to implement such plan;

     (d) review, analyze and advise the Debtor regarding claims or
causes of action to be pursued on behalf of the estate;

     (e) assist the Debtor in negotiations with various creditor
constituencies regarding an exit, resolution and payment of the
creditors' claims;

     (f) review and analyze the validity of the claims filed herein
and advise the Debtor as to the filing of objections to claims, if
necessary;

     (g) provide continuing legal advice with respect to the
bankruptcy, estate, litigation, avoidance actions and miscellaneous
other legal matters; and

     (h) perform all other necessary legal services as may be
prompted by the needs of the Debtor in this case.

Doyle S. Byers, Esq, Partner of Holland & Hart LLP, attests that
his firm is a disinterested person as that term is used in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

H&H's hourly rates are:

     Attorneys           $260 to $510
     Paraprofessional    $135 to $250

The counsel can be reached through:

     Mona L. Burton, Esq.
     Doyle S. Byers, Esq.
     Ellen E. Ostrow, Esq.
     HOLLAND & HART LLP
     222 South Main Street, Suite 2200
     Salt Lake City, UT 84101
     Tel: (801) 799-5800
     Fax: (801) 799-5700
     Email: mburton@hollandhart.com
            dsbyers@hollandhart.com
            eeostrow@hollandhart.com

                  About Courtside Condominiums

Courtside Condominiums, L.C. owns an apartment complex in West
Orem, Utah.

Courtside Condominiums filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bank. D. Utah Case No. 18-24074) on June 1,
2018.  In the petition signed by Robert Conte, managing member, the
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Kevin R. Anderson.
Ellen E. Ostrow, Esq., at Holland & Hart LLP, is the Debtor's
counsel.


CPI CARD: Lane Dubin Will Get $200,000 Retention Bonus
------------------------------------------------------
The compensation committee of the board of directors of CPI Card
Group Inc. has approved cash retention bonuses for certain
employees of the Company, including Lane Dubin, a named executive
officer of the Company.  The Retention Bonuses are intended to
incentivize and retain the recipients and ensure that they remain
focused on executing the Company's strategic initiatives.  Mr.
Dubin was awarded a Retention Bonus in the amount of $200,000.  The
Retention Bonuses will be paid on or about March 29, 2019 provided
the recipient is in good performance standing and remains
continuously employed by the Company through that date.

                         About CPI Card

CPI Card Group -- http://www.cpicardgroup.com/-- is a provider in
payment card production and related services, offering a single
source for credit, debit and prepaid debit cards including EMV
chip, personalization, instant issuance, fulfillment and mobile
payment services.  With more than 20 years of experience in the
payments market and as a trusted partner to financial institutions,
CPI's solid reputation of product consistency, quality and
outstanding customer service supports its position as a leader in
the market.  Serving the Company's customers from locations
throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, the
Company has a leading network of high security facilities in the
United States and Canada, each of which is certified by one or more
of the payment brands: Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover
and Interac in Canada.  The Company is headquartered in Littleton,
Colorado.

CPI Card incurred a net loss of $22.01 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2017, compared to net income of $5.40 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, CPI Card had $228.90
million in total assets, $352.32 million in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $123.41 million.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on April 4, 2018, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded its ratings for CPI Card Group Inc., including the
company's Corporate Family Rating (to Caa1, from B3) and
Probability of Default Rating (to Caa1-PD, from B3-PD).  Moody's
said the downgrades broadly reflect continued uncertainty about
whether CPI can return to revenue and profit growth over the next
12 to 18 months, and an earnings and cash flow profile that can
adequately support the company's heavy debt burden.

In March 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Littleton, Colo.-based CPI Card Group Inc. to 'CCC+' from
'B-'.  "The downgrade reflects our view that CPI's capital
structure is unsustainable at current levels of EBITDA.  However,
we do not anticipate a default scenario over the next 12 months
given that we believe liquidity availability will be sufficient to
absorb the expected negative discretionary cash flow.


CS MINING: Bankr. Ct. Lacks Jurisdiction to Grant TMC, NAC Request
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge William T. Thurman of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Utah denies Tamra Mining Company, LLC's Motion to
Enforce and Noble Americas Corporation's Motion to Enforce because
the Court lacks jurisdiction. Thus, it is no longer necessary to
rule on Clarity Copper, LLC and Skye Mineral Investor's, LLC
Cross-Motion to Stay.

Tamra filed a Motion to Enforce Sale Order and Enjoin and/or
Dismiss Purchased Claims on Feb. 15, 2018. Noble filed a Motion to
Enforce Order Granting Motion Pursuant to Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure 9019 and 7041 to Approve Stipulation for
Dismissal with Prejudice by and between CS Mining, LLC and Noble
Americas Corp. and to Enjoin Prosecution of Claims on March 9,
2018. Clarity and SMI filed a Cross-Motion to Stay the Motion of
Tamra Mining Company, LLC to Enforce Sale Order and Enjoin and/or
Dismiss Purchased Claims on Feb. 22, 2018.

At the preliminary hearing, the Court and the parties agreed to a
briefing schedule, and the parties agreed that the Court would
consider two issues at the final hearing: (1) whether the Court has
jurisdiction to grant the relief requested by Tamra and Noble; and
(2) whether the claims asserted by SMI and Clarity in the Delaware
Action were claims belonging to CS that were subsequently
transferred by sale to Tamra or released as a result of the CS
Mining-Noble settlement agreement.

Tamra contends that this Court has core and exclusive jurisdiction;
moreover, Tamra insists that this Court is the "only" court with
authority to adjudicate its Motion to Enforce. Tamara's view is
based on the Court's inherent ability to interpret and enforce its
own orders.  Noble takes a position quite similar to Tamra's, as
Noble too asserts that this Court has jurisdiction to enforce its
own orders and to enjoin actions that are contrary to its orders.

With regard to Tamra's Motion and Noble's Motion, Clarity and SMI
allege that this Court does not have jurisdiction to award the
relief requested by the Movants. In particular, the Cross-Movants
argue that this Court has neither core nor related jurisdiction
over the Delaware claims because all parties to the Delaware Action
are non-debtors and the resolution of these claims will have no
effect on the administration of the Debtor’s estate.

As the Supreme Court noted, "Congress has divided bankruptcy
proceedings into three categories: those that "aris[e] under title
11"; those that "aris[e] in" a Title 11 case; and those that are
"related to a case under title 11" and "District courts may refer
any or all such proceedings to the bankruptcy judges of their
district."

"Arising under" jurisdiction, as interpreted in this circuit,
requires that an asserted cause be created by the Bankruptcy Code,
"such as exemption claims under section 522, avoidance action under
section 544, or claims of discrimination under section 525." None
of the parties has opined that "enforcement" of a sales order or
order approving a settlement is a cause of action under the
Bankruptcy Code. Accordingly, this Court does not find it has
"arising under" jurisdiction to evaluate the claims being
championed in the Delaware Action.

The court next looks for "arising in" jurisdiction. This source of
jurisdiction arises from proceedings “that could not exist
outside of a bankruptcy case, but that are not causes of action
created by the code. Tamara and Noble assert that this Court has
"arising in" jurisdiction, as this Court approved the sales
agreement between the Debtor and Tamara and the settlement
agreement between Noble and the Debtor, which allows this Court to
enjoin actions that undermine these agreements.

In the present matter, there is no dispute about the particular
verbiage found in the Sales Order, instead the dispute centers on a
purchaser, who suspects that another entity is using its property,
i.e. claims it purchased from the Debtor. Consequently, without a
clear instruction from the appellate courts of this circuit, the
question of "arising in" jurisdiction must turn on whether the
Motions to Enforce could exist outside of a bankruptcy case; this
Court finds that they could. Because there is no dispute about the
terms of the Sales Order or Settlement Order, the crux of the
matter is essentially a dispute over property between two
non-debtor third parties--not an interpretation of what the order
says. These types of disputes could and are routinely resolved in
other, non-bankruptcy courts. Thus, the Court does not have
"arising in" jurisdiction to resolve Tamra's and Noble's
contentions.

Although the Delaware Plaintiffs assert causes of action that could
exist outside of a bankruptcy case and were not created by the
Bankruptcy Code, bankruptcy courts have one more area of
jurisdiction, "related to" jurisdiction, which may bring the claims
in the Delaware Action under this Court's purview. While it might
appear that suits between non-debtor third parties could never come
under the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court, this is not so. The
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit provided a test for courts
to consider when determining if they possess "related to"
jurisdiction over a proceeding, namely "the proceeding is related
to the bankruptcy if the outcome could alter the debtor's rights,
liabilities, options, or freedom of action in any way." In other
words, a "bankruptcy court lacks related jurisdiction to resolve
controversies between third-party creditors which do not involve
the debtor or his property unless the court cannot complete
administrative duties without resolving the controversy."

In the present case, Noble, Tamra, and the Delaware Plaintiffs all
agree that the resolution of the Delaware Action will have no
effect on the Debtor or its bankruptcy estate. Thus, this court
finds no "related to" jurisdiction because these disputes will not
affect the administration of the CS Mining's bankruptcy case.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated June 1,
2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/utb16-24818-1349.pdf

                     About CS Mining

CS Mining, LLC, is a mining and processing company headquartered in
Milford, Utah.

Purported creditors R.J. Bayer Professional Geologist, LLC;
Minerals Advisory Group, LLC; Rollins Construction & Trucking, LLC;
Rollins Machine, Inc.; and Oxbow Sulphur, Inc., filed an
involuntary petition to put the Company into Chapter 11 bankruptcy
(Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 16-24818) on June 2, 2016.  Brahma Group,
Inc., subsequently joined the petition.

On Aug. 4, 2016, the Debtor filed its Notice of Filing Letter to
the Consent and Proposed Form of Order, together with a proposed
form of Order for Relief, which Order was entered by the Court on
the Relief Date.  Pursuant to the Order for Relief, CS Mining
continues to operate its business and manage its properties as a
debtor-in-possession pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Judge William T. Thurman presides over the case.

The Petitioners are represented by Martin J. Brill, Esq., at
Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P and George B. Hofmann,
Esq., at Cohne Kinghorn PC.

CS Mining tapped Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. as local counsel, and Pepper
Hamilton LLP as its legal counsel, nunc pro tunc to June 2, 2016.
FTI Consulting, Inc., as restructuring advisor.  Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee on Aug. 12, 2016, appointed an Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee hired Levene, Neale, Bender,
Yoo & Brill L.L.P. as lead counsel and Cohne Kinghorn as local
counsel.


CTON CORPORATION: Case Summary & 13 Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: CTON Corporation
           aka C-Ton Corporation
           aka CTON Laboratory
           aka C-TON Laboratory
           aka VIitale Diagnostics
        3870 Del Amo Blvd., Suite 504
        Torrance, CA 90503

Business Description: CTON Corporation, which also operates under
                      the name C-Ton Laboratory, operates in the
                      medical laboratory industry.  Located in
                      Torrance, California, C-Ton Lab offers a
                      wide range of services including chemical,
                      immunology, toxicology, hormones and tumor
                      marker tests.  Visit https://www.ctonlab.com

                      for more information.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 10, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Los Angeles)

Case No.: 18-16692

Judge: Hon. Barry Russell

Debtor's Counsel: David B. Shemano, Esq.
                  SHEMANOLAW
                  1801 Century Park East, Suite 1600  
                  Los Angeles, CA 90067
                  Tel: 3104925033
                  E-mail: dshemano@shemanolaw.com

Total Assets as of June 8, 2018: $566,479

Total Liabilities as of June 8, 2018: $1,690,930

The petition was signed by Issam "Sam" Kabbani, president/chief
executive officer.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 13 unsecured creditors is available for free
at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb18-16692.pdf


CYCLONE CATTLE: Hires Ed Spencer Real Estate as Real Estate Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cyclone Cattle, L.L.C., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Iowa to employ Farms America/Ed
Spencer Real Estate as its Real Estate Agent, to market and sell
the Debtor's custom cattle feeding operations and real estate
located at 36488 Beechnut Rd., Carson, Iowa.

Specific services to be rendered by Spencer include national
advertising, marketing, identifying and communicating with
potential purchasers, and subject to court approval, closing a sale
of the property.

A single commission, in the amount of 5% of the gross sale proceeds
from the sale of any real estate property, will be paid to Spencer
upon the closing of the sale.

Ed Spencer, real estate agent at Farms America/Ed Spencer Real
Estate, attests that Spencer is a disinterested person within the
meaning of section 101(14) and represent no interests adverse to
Debtor or the estate in matters upon which it is to be engaged.

The broker can be reached through:

     Ed Spencer
     Farms America/Ed Spencer Real Estate
     322 E. 7th Street
     Logan, IA 51546
     Office: (712) 644-2151
     Cell: (402) 510-3276
     Email: ed@edspencer.com

                    About Cyclone Cattle

Cyclone Cattle, LLC, an Iowa corporation engaged in farming
operations including a cattle feed lot, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Iowa Case No. 18-00856) on April 17, 2018, estimating
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.

Jeffrey D. Goetz, Esq., at Bradshaw Fowler Proctor & Fairgrave
P.C., is the Debtor's counsel.  McGrath North Mullin & Kratz, PC
LLO, is the special counsel.  JT Korkow, d/b/a Northwest Financial
Consulting, is its financial advisor.

James L. Snyder, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 12, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors on May 1, 2018.  The
Committee retained Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP as its
legal counsel.


DAVID MULLANEY: Bid to Dismiss BOA, CMI 1st Counterclaim Junked
---------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Stephani W. Humrickhouse entered an order denying
Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss as to first counterclaim and
deferring remaining rulings in the case captioned DAVID DUNN
MULLANEY and ELISE HUMPHREYS MULLANEY, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A. and CITIMORTGAGE, INC. Defendants, Adv. Pro. No.
17-00039-5-SWH (Bankr. E.D.N.C.).

The Plaintiffs initiated the adversary proceeding on May 26, 2017.
In their complaint, the Plaintiffs assert two causes of action: (1)
avoidance of the Deed of Trust as a hypothetical judicial lien
creditor or (2) alternatively, avoidance of the Deed of Trust as a
hypothetical bona fide purchaser. The Plaintiffs base their claims
for relief on the lack of acknowledgment of the Deed of Trust as to
Mrs. Mullaney. In an amended answer filed Sept. 21, 2017, the
Defendants allege four counterclaims in their answer, being: (1)
quiet title and declaration of the Deed of Trust's validity; (2)
reformation of the Deed of Trust; (3) imposition of a purchase
money resulting trust; and (4) breach of warranty. In addition,
Defendants raise five affirmative defenses: (1) estoppel and
judicial estoppel (2) lack of standing; (3) estoppel, waiver, and
ratification; (4) unconstitutionality of North Carolina General
Statute section 39-9; and (5) common facts.

The Plaintiffs then filed a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims of
Defendants and Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses of Defendants
and Memorandum in Support Thereof and a Motion to Strike
Affirmative Defenses on August 31, 2017. The Plaintiffs filed a
Supplement to their Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims of Defendants
and Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses of Defendants on Jan. 2,
2018. The Defendants filed a Response and Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike on Sept. 21,
2017, and a Supplement to Response and Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike on Jan. 8,
2018.

Plaintiffs assert that viewing the counterclaims, in the best light
for the Defendants, they fail as a matter of law. Although the
Defendants assert five separate counterclaims, for purposes of the
motion to dismiss, the court only considers the first one at this
time, for if the motion is not allowed as to the counterclaim to
quiet title and a declaration of the Deed of Trust's validity, it
would be premature to consider either the motion to dismiss the
other counterclaims or the motion to strike the affirmative
defenses. Therefore, the court turns to the threshold question,
with reference to North Carolina state law: the legal effect of the
omission of Mrs. Mullaney's name in the notarial acknowledgment on
the validity of the Deed of Trust.

The Deed of Trust purports to be signed by both Mr. and Mrs.
Mullaney--both of their signatures appear on it. There is no
question that Mr. Mullaney's signature has been properly
acknowledged. The sole impediment to the registration of the Deed
of Trust and thus its validity, is whether Mrs. Mullaney's
signature has been "proven or acknowledged by her according to
law." The language does not set forth proper acknowledgment by a
notary of the wife's signature as the only means of compliance. The
signature may be proven or acknowledged by her according to law.
Therefore, the court may receive evidence of her signature by
affidavit, or her oral evidence through either direct or
cross-examination testimony. The Defendants should therefore not be
prohibited from eliciting such "proof" or "acknowledgment" from Mr.
Mullaney at trial, rendering a motion to dismiss inappropriate.

The court will continue to adhere to a policy of flexibility with
regard to the interpretation of the Notarial Act, while still
following the dictates of North Carolina's policy of protecting
spouses in the execution of legal documents. This can be
accomplished by following the express language of N.C. Gen. Stat.
section 39-9 and allowing proof on the issue of execution.

Inasmuch as the Deed of Trust's validity is a threshold issue, the
Defendants' three remaining counterclaims are dependent upon its
resolution. The Defendants specifically plead each of the
aforementioned counterclaims in the alternative to their first
counterclaim concerning the Deed of Trust's validity, such that it
would be improper for the court to address them at this point in
the proceeding. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss
counterclaims two, three and four will be held in abeyance until
the first counterclaim is adjudicated.

The Defendants' affirmative defenses are similarly dependent on the
resolution of the validity of the Deed of Trust. It would be
premature, then, for the court to address the defenses at this
point in the proceeding. Therefore, the Plaintiffs' motion to
strike all affirmative defenses will be held in abeyance until the
first counterclaim is adjudicated.

Based on the foregoing, the Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the
Defendants' first counterclaim is denied. The Plaintiffs' motion to
dismiss all other counterclaims and motion to strike are held in
abeyance pending an evidentiary hearing.

The bankruptcy case is in re: DAVID DUNN MULLANEY, ELISE HUMPHREYS
MULLANEY, Chapter 11, Case No. 17-02594-5-SWH (Bankr. E.D.N.C.).

A copy of the Court's Order dated May 15, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2sNvjDh from Leagle.com.

David Dunn Mullaney & Elise Humphries Mullaney, Plaintiffs,
represented by Richard Preston Cook -- capefeardebtrelief@gmail.com
-- Richard P. Cook, PLLC.

Bank of America, N.A. & Citmortgage, Inc., Defendants, represented
by Zipporah Basile Edwards -- -- zedwards@horacktalley.com --  --
Horack Talley Pharr & Lowndes, P.A.

Bank of America, N.A. & Citmortgage, Inc., Counter-Claimants,
represented by Zipporah Basile Edwards Horack Talley Pharr &
Lowndes, P.A.

David Dunn Mullaney & Elise Humphries Mullaney, Counter-Defendants,
represented by Richard Preston Cook , Richard P. Cook, PLLC.

David Dunn Mullaney and Elise Humphries Mullaney filed for chapter
11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.C. Case No. 17-02594) on May
26, 2017, and are represented by Richard Preston Cook, Esq. of
Richard P. Cook, PLLC.


DENT DEPOT: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% Over 120 Months
----------------------------------------------------------
Dent Depot, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas a combined plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement.

The Plan provides for one class of secured claims; zero classes of
unsecured claims; and one class of equity security holders. The
Plan also provides for the payment of administrative and priority
claims.

Class 4, unsecured claims, the Debtor will pay 25% of each
respective over a 120 month period at 0.0% interest beginning
August 15, 2018. Each monthly payment will be $1,465.96.

Class 4 of the Plan provides that Jeffrey Todd Stevenson retains
his ownership interest.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-10311-72.pdf

                     About Dent Depot LLC

Dent Depot, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-10311) on Dec. 4,
2017.  The Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of less than $1 million.  Judge Robert L. Jones
presides over the case.  The Debtor is represented by Max R.
Tarbox, Esq., at Tarbox Law, P.C.


DPW HOLDINGS: Sets Goals for the Next 10 Years
----------------------------------------------
DPW Holdings, Inc., participated in an event hosted by an
independent third-party in West Los Angeles, CA on June 6, 2018  to
discuss the contents of a presentation prepared by the Company.
The Corporate Presentation discusses developments in the Company's
business, provides a new corporate overview, a new financial
guidance and outlook for fiscal year 2018 and the next 10 years as
well as discusses the Company's perspective and strategies for
growth.

DPW's 10 year objectives include:

  * Targeting to achieve compounded annual revenue growth of
    25-35%

  * Targeting to achieve compounded annual net income growth of
    5%

  * Targeting to achieve positive unrestricted free cash flow by
    end of 2019

The company intends to continue seeking new acquisition
opportunities including crypto mining, hospitality and commercial
defense.  In 2018, Coolisys plans to develop power supplies for
crypto, defense, aerospace and industrial industries.  SuperCrypto
is on track to deploy 10,000 miners by Dec. 31, 2018.  Digital
Power Lending is focused on an aggresive rollout of the online
lending platform and offering micro-loans and mortgages.

The Corporate Presentation is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/NYDKt2

                       About DPW Holdings

Headquartered in Fremont, California, DPW Holdings, Inc.,  formerly
known as Digital Power Corp. -- http://www.DPWHoldings.com/-- is a
diversified holding company that, through its wholly owned
subsidiary, Coolisys Technologies, Inc., is dedicated to providing
technology-based solutions where innovation is the main driver for
mission-critical applications and lifesaving services.  Coolisys'
growth strategy targets core markets that are characterized by
"high barriers to entry" and include specialized products and
services not likely to be commoditized.  Coolisys through its
portfolio companies develops and manufactures cutting-edge resonant
switching power topologies, specialized complex high-frequency
radio frequency (RF) and microwave detector-log video amplifiers,
very high-frequency filters and naval power conversion and
distribution equipment.  Coolisys services the defense, aerospace,
medical and industrial sectors and manages four entities including
Digital Power Corporation, www.DigiPwr.com, a manufacturer based in
Northern California, 1-877-634-0982; Digital Power Limited dba
Gresham Power Ltd., www.GreshamPower.com, a manufacturer based in
Salisbury, UK.; Microphase Corporation, www.MicroPhase.com with its
headquarters in Shelton, CT 1- 203-866-8000; and Power-Plus
Technical Distributors, www.Power-Plus.com, a wholesale distributor
based in Sonora, CA 1-800-963-0066.  Coolisys operates the branded
division, Super Crypto Power, www.SuperCryptoPower.com.

DPW Holdings incurred a net loss of $10.89 million in 2017
following a net loss of $1.12 million in 2016.  As of March 31,
2018, DPW Holdings had $38.49 million in total assets, $16.66
million in total liabilities and $21.83 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Marcum
LLP, in New York, on the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating
that the Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has
incurred significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to
meet its obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


EARTH PRIDE: Finalizing Loan Agreement with Big Shoulder
--------------------------------------------------------
Earth Pride Organics, LLC, and Lancaster Fine Foods, Inc., filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Pennsylvania
their third amended disclosure statement to accompany their third
amended plan of reorganization dated June 1, 2018.

In this filing, the Debtors disclose that they are in the midst of
completing a loan agreement with Big Shoulder Capital to provide
exit financing which will net the Debtors approximately $1,450,000
to help meet the requirements of the Plan of Reorganization which
include the payment of Midtown Capital Partners and Loeb Term
Solutions, LLC's secured debt.

The terms and conditions of the Exit Financing are as follows:

   Lender:                   Big Shoulder Capital
   Exit Financing Facility:  LFF & EPO
   Amount:                   $1,500,000
   Term:                     2 years
   Rate:                     WSJ Prime Rate (4.75%) plus + 9.5%
   Amortization:             4 Years
   Total Payments:           $41,280 approximately per month
   Closing Fee:              1%

Applying these terms and conditions, it is undisputed that the
Debtors will be in much better financial shape once this
transaction is closed as the loan agreement obtained provides a
fixed interest rate (4.75% + 9.50% = 14.25%) that is significantly
lower than the blended rate in excess of 24% that the Debtors'
previous lender was charging as clearly reflected by these terms
and conditions, the reorganized entity will be poised to emerge
from bankruptcy with ample cash flow to satisfy ongoing obligations
and development of the entity's business. All in all, the Plan
proposed by the Debtors is feasible and provides adequate and
proper means of implementation through the exit financing facility
ultimately obtained.

The claims of Fox Rothschild and Dalmatia have also been added in
this plan in Classes 4 and 5 respectively.

Fox's Class 4 claim is secured by a lien on all assets of the
Debtors in the amount of $2,449,839.94. This claim is disputed as
to the value of Secured Interest in the assets of the Debtor and
the value of the underlying claim. The Debtors proposes to pay this
claim over five years at a rate of 3% per year.

Dalmatia's Class 5 claim is in the amount of $1,758,871.00 pursuant
to a settlement agreement approved by the District Court and the
Bankruptcy Court. Dalmatia will be paid 10% of its claim as per the
stipulation approved by the Bankruptcy Court in full satisfaction
of its monetary obligation under the stipulation between the
Debtors and Dalmatia. These payments will be paid quarterly in 4.5
Years. The other obligations of the stipulation will stay in force
against the parties to the stipulation.

The latest plan also provides a new treatment of the allowed
unsecured claims.

The Allowed Unsecured Claims, either individually or jointly held
against EPO or LFF, are now classified in Classes 9 and 10. Class 9
and 10 creditors will receive a payment equal to 15% percent of
their allowed claim payable in years 1 through 5 at 3% per year.
These payments will start 120 days after confirmation and then all
payments will be paid out on a monthly basis. Beginning in Years 6,
7 and 8, these creditors will be paid 8% of their claims on a
monthly basis. These payments may be increased in addition to being
paid sooner depending on a tax enhancement in which any income the
debtor saves pursuant to the application of Net Operating Losses
available to the Debtor which will be split 50/50 between the
Debtor and Class 9/10 claims. Joint Creditors of Classes 9 and 10
will receive one single satisfaction for their claim.

If $1,897,631 is the saving from the Net Operating Losses available
to be used by the Debtors then the company would split this amount
with the Unsecured Creditors and the Debtor each receiving
approximately $948,000. The Unsecured Creditors would receive
$550,000 toward their claims to get from 39% to a 50% maximum and
the remainder of $398,000 would be used to pay the years 6, 7 and 8
earlier.

A Redlined copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-13816-422.pdf

A Redlined copy of the Third Amended Plan is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/paeb17-13816-419.pdf

                About Earth Pride Organics LLC

Earth Pride Organics, LLC -- http://earthprideorganics.com/-- is a
family owned holding company that includes American Specialty
Foods, Lancaster Fine Foods, EPX Trucking and C.O. Nolt's Bakery
Supply.  Headquartered in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, each EPO
subsidiary shares the commonality of specialty food and creates a
vertically integrated organization. Lancaster Fine Foods, Inc. --
http://www.lancasterfinefoods.com-- manufactures and sells food,
offering barbecue sauces, mustards, salsas, marinades, hot sauces,
chutneys, cheese spreads, and other common condiments.

Earth Pride and Lancaster Fine Foods sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case Nos. 17-13816 and 17-13819) on May
31, 2017, each estimating assets and liabilities between $1 million
and $10 million.  The petitions were signed by Michael S. Thompson,
their managing member.

Judge Eric L. Frank presides over the bankruptcy cases.

Paul Brinton Mashchmeyer, Esq., at MaschmeyerKaralis P.C., serves
as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


EASTMAN KODAK: S&P Cuts Corp. Credit Rating to 'CCC', Outlook Neg.
------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit rating on
Rochester, N.Y.–based Eastman Kodak Co. (Kodak) to 'CCC' from
'CCC+'. The outlook is negative.

S&P said, "We also lowered the issue-level rating on the company's
first-lien secured term loan to 'CCC' from 'CCC+'. The recovery
rating is unchanged at '3', indicating our expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 55%) recovery in the event
of payment default.

"The downgrade reflects our view of the heightened risk that Kodak
may not be able to refinance its 2019 debt maturity in a timely
manner and at favorable terms.  

Kodak recently announced its first-quarter 2018 financial results,
in which the company reported flat revenue growth and weaker
profitability compared to a year ago. It also reported another
quarter of negative operating cash flow; the company has now
reported negative operating cash flow for four of the past six
quarters. The company's cash balance declined approximately 17%
year-over-year to $313 million, and was approximately $200 million
lower than in the first quarter of fiscal 2016.  

"The negative outlook reflects our view that Eastman Kodak's
current capital structure is unsustainable due to increased
refinancing risk, particularly with respect to the company's
first-lien secured term loan due September 2019.  As a result, we
believe Kodak is subject to increased risk of undergoing a
restructuring under terms that we would consider to be distressed.

"We could lower the rating if it becomes clear that Kodak will not
be able to refinance its 2019 term loan, increasing the risk that
the company may pursue what we would consider to be a distressed
exchange.

"We could raise the rating if Kodak is able to successfully
refinance its 2019 term loan, such that we have increased
confidence that the company will be able to meet its coming
commitments."


ECS REFINING: Cash Collateral Use Authorized on Final Basis
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Robert S. Bardwil of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of California, at the behest of W. Donald Gieseke,
the Chapter 11 trustee for ECS Refining, Inc., has authorized the
use of postpetition cash collateral on a final basis.

A full-text copy of the Final Order is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb18-22453-162.pdf

                      About ECS Refining Inc.

ECS Refining, Inc. -- https://www.ecsrefining.com/ -- offers a full
suite of IT asset management and disposition solutions.  It
provides national brand protection solutions for environmental
services, IT asset management, data protection and end-of-life
electronic recycling services.  ECS was founded in 1980 by Jim and
Ken Taggart as a processor of post-manufacturing scrap and residues
for OEMs in the Silicon Valley.  

As the electronics industry enjoyed rapid growth and manufacturing
operations were outsourced to other parts of the world, ECS adapted
by shifting its focus to processing post-consumer electronics.  The
company has locations in Rogers, Arizona; Santa Clara, California;
Santa Fe Springs, California; Stockton, California; Columbus, Ohio;
Medford, Oregon; Portland, Oregon; and Mesquite, Texas.  

ECS Refining sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 18-22453) on April 24, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Jack Rockwood, president, the Debtor
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million.  

Judge Robert S. Bardwil presides over the case.

The Debtor tapped Snell & Wilmer LLP as its legal counsel; Ringstad
& Sanders LLP as special counsel; and MCA Financial Group, Ltd., as
its financial advisor.

W. Donald Gieseke was appointed as the Chapter 11 Trustee.  The
Trustee hired Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby & Pascuzzi LLP as
his legal counsel.


EMERALD GRANDE: Bankruptcy Case Remains in Chapter 11, Ct. Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Patrick M. Flatley of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of West Virginia denied Creditors First Bank of
Charleston, Inc., and Carter Bank and Trust's motion to convert
Emerald Grande, LLC's Chapter 11 case to one under Chapter 7 of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The Creditors argue that cause exists to convert the Debtor's case
because of the continued diminution of the estate and absence of a
reasonable likelihood of rehabilitation, the Debtor's alleged
administrative insolvency, and the Debtor's alleged gross
mismanagement of its estate.

The Debtor argues that its case should remain in Chapter 11 because
it is now operating with a positive monthly cash flow, its
administrative costs will be addressed through a new plan and cash
infusion by Tara Retail Group, LLC's manager William Abruzzino, and
that it has not grossly mismanaged its estate.

Whether cause exists under section 1112(b)(4)(A) is a matter of
perspective in this case. For instance, the Creditors urge the
court to examine the estate from its inception seventeen months
ago. But using only the last several months provides a much
different perspective, which the court finds better informs its
decision under section 1112(b)(4)(A). Although it is uncertain
whether the Debtor can obtain confirmation of a plan and ultimately
be successful post-bankruptcy, the court finds its performance,
particularly in 2018, to warrant it remaining in Chapter 11.
Notably, this case is nearing its logical end, as the Debtor will
either obtain confirmation within a reasonable time or it will
not.

As for administrative expenses in the case, the court cannot
determine at this time that the expenses cause the estate to
actually be administratively insolvent.

The court also finds that the Creditors have not demonstrated that
the Debtor has grossly mismanaged its estate. The Creditors' main
contention in that regard is that the Debtor should not support
Tara's administrative expense claim for part of the cost associated
with rebuilding the bridge to Tara's property and the Elkview
Hotel. The choice of the Debtor to support or oppose Tara's claim
is well-within its discretion as it navigates its case. Such
support bears no indication as to the quality of the estate's
management of its assets or the operation of its business. It may
well be reasonable to support such a claim for at least part of the
bridge's construction costs when the Debtor's Elkview Hotel was
shuttered without commercially-reasonable access prior to Tara
restoring access. Moreover, the merits of Tara's claim have yet to
be litigated and, despite the fumbling and inconsistent approach by
the Debtor's special counsel in that regard, the court presently
cannot disregard or ostracize the Debtor’s approach. In any
event, the court cannot say that the Debtor's litigation position
constitutes mismanagement, let alone gross mismanagement.

As a result, the court finds that the Creditors have failed to meet
their burden to demonstrate that cause exists at this time to
convert the Debtor's case to one under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy
Code. Consequently, the court need not address whether unusual
circumstances exist such that conversion is not in the best
interest of creditors.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated June 4,
018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/wvnb1-17-00021-419.pdf

                    About Emerald Grande

Emerald Grande, LLC, owns and operates two hotel properties, the La
Quinta Inn and Suites adjacent to the Elkview Crossings Shopping
Mall, in Elkview, West Virginia; and the La Quinta Inn and Suites
adjacent to the Merchants Walk Shopping Mall, in Summersville, West
Virginia.  It also owns a real estate development in Charleston
(Kanawha City), West Virginia.

Emerald Grande filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. W.Va. Case
No. 17-00021) on Jan. 11, 2017.  The petition was signed by William
A. Abruzzino, managing member. The case is assigned to Judge
Patrick M. Flatley.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $10 million to $50
million at the time of the filing.  The Debtor is represented by
Steven L. Thomas, Esq., at Kay, Casto & Chaney PLLC.  The Debtor
employs Woomer, Nistendirk & Associates PLLC as accountant; and
Realcorp, LLC as broker, with Jon Cavendish serving as the listing
agent, to market and sell its property in Kanawha County, West
Virginia.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


EMMANUEL HEALTH: Hires Margaret Maxwell McClure as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Health Homecare, Inc., filed an amended application
seeking authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas (Houston) to hire Margaret M. McClure as attorney
to give the debtor legal advice with respect to debtor's powers and
duties as debtor-in-possession in the continued operation of the
debtor's business and management of the debtor's property and to
perform all legal services for the debtor-in-possession.

The counsel's current rates are:

     Margaret M. McClure    $400 per hour
     Paralegal              $150 per hour

Margaret Maxwell McClure, Esq., attests that she does not have an
interest adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of
creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any direct or
indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the
Debtor or for any other reason.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Margaret Maxwell McClure, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF MARGARET M. MCCLURE
     909 Fannin, Suite 3810
     Houston, TX 77010
     Tel: 713-659-1333
     Fax: 713-658-0334
     Email: margaret@mmmcclurelaw.com

                About Emmanuel Health Homecare

Emmanuel Health Homecare, Inc., is a home health care services
provider in Houston, Texas.  The company is a small business debtor
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D).

Emmanuel Health Homecare filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case no.
18-32635) on May 21, 2018.  In the petition signed by Joyce Jones,
R.N., CEO, the Debtor disclosed $161,200 in total assets and $1.30
million in total liabilities.  Margaret Maxwell McClure, Esq., at
LAW OFFICE OF MARGARET M. MCCLURE, is the Debtor's counsel.


EPICENTER PARTNERS: Ct. Affirms Exclusion of Late Fees in CPF Claim
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant CPF Vaseo Associates, LLC in the case captioned CPF Vaseo
Associates, LLC, Appellant, v. Sonoran Desert Land Investors, LLC,
et al., Appellees, 2:17-cv-03346-SPL (D. Ariz.) brings an appeal of
a judgment issued by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Arizona
in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases of Epicenter Partners LLC, et
al. The Court has reviewed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling denying
the inclusion of per diem late fees in CPF's proofs of claim and
CPF's request for discovery and an evidentiary hearing on the same
issue. The appeal is fully briefed and District Judge Steven P.
Logan affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's judgment.

Appellees Sonoran Desert Land Investors, LLC, East of Epicenter,
LLC, and Gray Phoenix Desert Ridge II, LLC entered into two loan
agreements with Pacific Coach, Inc. The first loan was made to SDLI
and GPDR II in the principal amount of $26.5 million, evidenced by
a loan agreement and promissory note dated Dec. 10, 2014, and the
second loan was made to EoE in the principal amount of $3.7
million, evidenced by a loan agreement and promissory note dated
Sept. 17, 2014. The loan agreements call for steep penalties in the
event of the Debtors' default.

SDLI and GPDR II defaulted on the $26.5 MM Loan by failing to make
an interest payment due on February 9, 2016, and EoE defaulted on
the $3.7 MM Loan by failing to make the required monthly payment
due on January 16, 2016. Neither payment default was cured within
five days. As a consequence, $10,000 per diem late fees started to
accrue on the $26.5 MM Loan beginning on February 10, 2016, and
$1,500 per diem late fees began to accrue on the $3.7 MM Loan
beginning on January 17, 2016. Debtors did not make any subsequent
payments on the Loans and failed to pay off the Loans in full on or
before the dates the Loans were set to mature. Pacific Coast
assigned its interest in the Loans to CPF on June 3, 2016.

On July 6, 2016, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The cases were jointly
administered, and the Bankruptcy Court set a general claims bar
date of October 20, 2016. CPF filed proofs of claims in the
bankruptcy cases for, among other things, outstanding principal,
interest, attorneys' fees, costs, and the per diem late fees owed
under the terms of the loan agreements. In total, CPF asserted a
secured claim related to the $26.5 MM Loan in the amount of
$30,572,496.22 and a secured claim related to the $3.7 MM Loan in
the amount of $4,364,146.17.

Here, the Court finds that the Late Fees are duplicative of other
provisions in the loan agreements intended to compensate CPF in the
event of the Debtors' default, specifically in the form of default
interest. CPF will be sufficiently compensated for the loss of use
of the default payments through the inclusion of accrued regular
interest and default interest in its proofs of claim approved by
the Bankruptcy Court. Therefore, CPF will be compensated for its
losses, both for loss of use of the payments due under the Loans
and opportunity costs, by the Debtors' obligation to pay regular
interest at a rate of 12% and default interest at a rate of 18%.
The loan agreements and the claim amounts approved by the
Bankruptcy Court also compensate CPF for attorneys' fees and
collection costs. As the Debtors noted, CPF is being compensated
with more than $14,000 per day in interest payments, making the
added costs of the Late Fees unnecessarily punitive.

It is the Court's opinion that the 18% default interest rate set
forth in the loan agreements represented appropriate compensation
for the "lost opportunity costs" alleged by CPF, the amount of
which was already included in the amount of CPF's claims allowed in
the bankruptcy cases. The fact that CPF was not able to benefit
from compounding interest is of no consequence to the
reasonableness of the Late Fees. The loan agreements provided for a
default interest rate in addition to the Late Fees. Thus, CPF's
lost opportunity costs were in fact compensated by the 18% default
interest rate and did not need to be compensated separately by the
Late Fees.

The Court affirms the Bankruptcy Court's ruling that the Late Fees
qualify as an unenforceable penalty under Arizona law. The Late
Fees neither reasonably forecasted CPF's anticipated damages for
the losses identified in the Late Fee provisions nor reasonably
approximated CPF's actual losses. The difficulty of proving CPF's
losses as a result of the Debtors' default was minimal. CPF will be
fairly compensated for any losses through the amounts accrued from
the default and regular interest rates, the amounts of which were
already included in the proofs of claim approved by the Bankruptcy
Court. For the said reasons, this Court affirms the Bankruptcy
Court's decision on denying the inclusion of the Late Fees in CPF's
proofs of claim.

A copy of the Court's Order dated May 16, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2Jzon2Z from Leagle.com.

CPF Vaseo Associates LLC, Appellant, represented by John R.
Clemency -- jclemency@polsinelli.com -- Polsinelli PC, Lindsi
Michelle Weber -- lweber@polsinelli.com -- Polsinelli PC & Todd
Andrew Burgess -- tburgess@polsinelli.com -- Polsinelli PC.

Arizona State Land Department, Creditor, represented by Dean
Christian Waldt -- WALDTDBALLARDSPAHR.COM -- Ballard Spahr LLP.

Emerald Equities LLC, Creditor, represented by David Dennis Cleary
-- clearyd@gtlaw.com -- Greenberg Traurig LLP.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor, represented by
Patrick A. Clisham -- pac@eblawyers.com -- Engelman Berger PC,
Scott B. Cohen -- sbc@eblawyers.com -- Engelman Berger PC & Steven
N. Berger -- snb@eblawyers.com -- Engelman Berger PC.

Desert Ridge Community Association, Creditor, represented by
Michael Walter Zimmerman -- mz@berryriddell.com -- Berry Riddell
LLC.

Maricopa County Treasurer, named as: Maricopa County Treasurer's
Office, Creditor, represented by Lori Ann Lewis , Maricopa County
Attorneys Office - Civil Services Division.

Sonoran Desert Land Investors LLC, Debtor, East of Epicenter LLC,
Debtor & Gray Phoenix Desert Ridge II LLC, Debtor, Appellees,
represented by David Jeffrey Hindman -- dhindman@mcrazlaw.com --
Mesch Clark & Rothschild PC, Frederick Jay Petersen --
fpetersen@mcrazlaw.com -- Mesch Clark & Rothschild PC, Isaac Daniel
Rothschild -- irothschild@mcrazlaw.com -- Mesch Clark & Rothschild
PC, Jeffrey Jacob Coe -- jcoe@mcrazlaw.com -- Mesch Clark &
Rothschild PC & Michael William McGrath -- mmcgrath@mcrazlaw.com --
Mesch Clark & Rothschild PC.

Epicenter Partners LLC & Gray Meyer Fannin LLC, Debtors,
represented by David Jeffrey Hindman , Mesch Clark & Rothschild PC,
Frederick Jay Petersen , Mesch Clark & Rothschild PC, Isaac Daniel
Rothschild , Mesch Clark & Rothschild PC, Jeffrey Jacob Coe , Mesch
Clark & Rothschild PC & Michael William McGrath , Mesch Clark &
Rothschild PC.

                   About Epicenter Partners

Epicenter Partners LLC was formed in 2004 to acquire, manage, sell
or hold land for investment.  Gray Meyer Fannin LLC came into
existence in 2001 and was originally formed to provide development
services for affiliates.  Both are fully owned by Gray/Western
Development Company and managed, pursuant to that entity, by Bruce
Gray.

The companies sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Lead Case No. 16-05493) on May 16, 2016.
Epicenter disclosed $143,212,665 in assets and $66,913,279 in
liabilities.

Epicenter and GMF tapped Thomas J. Salerno, Esq., at Stinson
Leonard Street, LLP, as their Chapter 11 counsel.  Mesch Clark
Rothschild was later hired as substitute counsel to Stinson Leonard
Street.

On June 15, 2016, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed five
creditors of Epicenter and GMF to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors.  The committee is represented by Michael W.
Carmel, Ltd., as counsel.

On November 22, 2016, Sonoran Desert Land Investors LLC, East of
Epicenter LLC, and Gray Phoenix Desert Ridge II LLC, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz.
Case Nos. 16-07659 to 16-07661).  The cases are jointly
administered with that of Epicenter.

On Feb. 6, 2017, CPF Vaseo Associates LLC, a secured creditor,
proposed a plan of reorganization for Epicenter, Gray Meyer,
Sonoran, East of Epicenter, and Gray Phoenix.

On Feb. 7, 2017, Sonoran, East of Epicenter and Gray Phoenix filed
a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement proposing to pay
their general unsecured creditors in full.  The plan has been
proposed for the three companies only.


EVO PAYMENTS: Moody's Affirms B2 CFR & Cuts 1st Lien Loan to B2
---------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service affirmed EVO Payments International,
LLC's B2 Corporate Family Rating ("CFR"), B2-PD Probability of
Default Rating ("PDR"), and B2 Senior Secured Revolving Credit
Facility. In addition, Moody's downgraded the first lien term loan
rating to B2 from B1. Moody's also assigned a speculative grade
liquidity rating of SGL-2. The outlook remains positive.

Following EVO's initial public offering (IPO), EVO repaid the $175
million second lien term loan and $63 million seller note using a
combination of proceeds from the IPO and revolver borrowings.
Accordingly, Moody's withdrew the second lien term loan rating.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The downgrade of the first lien term loan reflects the full
repayment of the $175 million second lien term loan, as the first
lien debt will no longer benefit from the loss absorption cushion
of junior debt in the capital structure. EVO now effectively has
one class of debt (first lien debt) with the instrument ratings the
same as the B2 CFR.

With debt reduction of $238 million following the IPO, EVO's
adjusted leverage has improved to about 5x from the mid 6x range.
Moody's believes that while the lower leverage strengthens EVO's
credit profile, the uncertainty regarding the inflection point for
generating positive free cash (after distributions to members and
minority interests) still weighs on the B2 CFR. Moody's expects
that EVO will generate organic net revenue growth in the high
single digits and double-digit profit growth. However, ongoing
investments to support the growth will lead to slightly negative to
flat free cash flow (FCF) for 2018, which follows three years of
negative FCF.

EVO's SGL-2 rating reflects the company's good liquidity position,
which is supported by over $30 million of available cash on hand
(excluding funds set aside for merchant settlement activities) and
Moody's expectation of free cash flow generation (net of
distribution to its members) of about $40 million in 2019. EVO's
liquidity is also reinforced by an upsized revolving credit
facility of $200 million (from $135 million) due 2023.

The positive outlook reflects Moody's expectation that EVO will
generate FCF of about $40 million in 2019 as operating performance
benefits from investments incurred to enhance EVO's e-commerce and
integrated payment technologies, build out its independent software
vendors (ISV) channel, and expand the merchant base in Mexico and
Europe. With modest debt repayment and EBITDA growth, Moody's
anticipates that debt leverage will further improve to below 4.5
times level by the end of 2019.

The ratings could be upgraded if EVO increases market share through
organic revenue growth without pressuring operating margins,
sustains debt to EBITDA at about 4 times, and generates FCF to debt
in the high single digit percentage range. The ratings could be
downgraded with declines in revenue and profits, increased customer
churn, or weakening free cash flow. In addition, negative rating
pressure could arise from debt funded dividend payments,
acquisitions, or the inability to grow profits such that financial
leverage exceeds 6 for an extended period of time.

Affirmations:

Issuer: EVO Payments International, LLC

Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed B2-PD

Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed B2

Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Affirmed B2 (LGD3)

Downgrade:

Issuer: EVO Payments International, LLC

Senior Secured First Lien Term Loan, B2 (LGD3) from B1 (LGD3)

Assignment:

Issuer: EVO Payments International, LLC

Speculative Liquidity Rating of SGL-2

Withdrawals:

Issuer: EVO Payments International, LLC

Senior Secured Second Lien Term Loan, previously rated Caa1
(LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: EVO Payments International, LLC

Outlook, Positive

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

With projected annual revenues approaching $600 million, EVO is a
global provider of electronic commerce and payment processing
solutions for merchants.


FAIRMOUNT SANTROL: Fitch Withdraws 'B-' LT IDR Amid Company Merger
------------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has withdrawn Fairmount Santrol Holdings Inc.'s
long-term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) at 'B-' and all affiliated
ratings.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Fitch is withdrawing the ratings of Fairmount Santrol Holdings Inc.
and Fairmount Santrol Inc. as Fairmount Santrol has been merged and
no longer exists. Accordingly, Fitch will no longer provide ratings
or analytical coverage for Fairmount Santrol.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Rating sensitivities are no longer relevant given Fitch's
withdrawal.

FULL LIST OF RATINGS PRIOR TO WITHDRAWAL

Fairmount Santrol Holdings Inc.

-- Long-term IDR 'B-'.

Fairmount Santrol Inc.

-- Long-term IDR 'B-';

-- Senior secured ABL credit facility 'BB-'/'RR1';

-- Senior secured term loan 'B+'/'RR2'.

The Rating Watch is Positive.


FHH PROPERTIES: Trustee Hires Valbridge Property as Appraiser
-------------------------------------------------------------
R. Patrick Sharp, III, the Chapter 11 Trustee of FHH Properties,
LLC, and its debtor-affiliates, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana to employ
Valbridge Property Advisors, as appraiser to the Trustee.

The Trustee requires Valbridge Property to appraise the Debtors'
properties located at 3032 Elysian Fields and 3101 Elysian Fields,
New Orleans, Louisiana.

Valbridge Property will be paid a flat fee of $3,500.

Arthur L. Schwertz, senior managing director of Valbridge Property
Advisors, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and
their estates.

Valbridge Property can be reached at:

     Arthur L. Schwertz
     VALBRIDGE PROPERTY ADVISORS
     P.O. Box 321
     Metairie, LA 70004
     Tel: (504) 830-3880

                     About FHH Properties

Each of FHH Properties and FNR Properties is a real estate company
based in New Orleans, Louisiana.  They are affiliated with B
Express-Elysian Fields, LLC, which sought Chapter 7 bankruptcy
protection on Jan. 18, 2018.  Fatmah Hamdan is the 100% owner of
all three businesses.

FHH Properties LLC based in Gretna, LA, and FNR Properties filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. La. Lead Case No. 18-10113) on
Jan. 18, 2018.  In the petition signed by Fatmah Hamdan, managing
member and sole owner, FHH Properties estimated $1 million to $10
million in both assets and in liabilities.  FNR Properties
estimated $500,0000 to $1 million in both assets and in
liabilities.

The Hon. Jerry A. Brown presides over the cases.

Robin R. De Leo, Esq., at The De Leo Law Firm, LLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtors; and Patrick Gros CPA, APAC, as
accountant.

R. Patrick Sharp, III, was appointed Chapter 11 trustee for the
Debtor.  The Trustee hired Heller Draper Patrick Horn & Manthey,
LLC, as counsel.


FLORENCE HOSPITAL: PCO Hires Allen Barnes as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Jerry Seelig, the Patient Care Ombudsman of Florence Hospital At
Anthem, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates, seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to employ Allen
Barnes & Jones, PLC, as counsel to the PCO.

The PCO requires Allen Barnes to represent and provide legal
services to the PCO in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Allen Barnes will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Hilary Barnes, Member                  $405
     Philip J. Giles, Associate             $335
     David B. Nelson, Associate             $225
     Legal Assistants/Law Clerks        $115 to $145

Allen Barnes will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Hilary L. Barnes, a partner at Allen Barnes & Jones, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Allen Barnes can be reached at:

     Hilary L. Barnes, Esq.
     David B. Nelson, Esq.
     ALLEN BARNES & JONES, PLC
     1850 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1150
     Phoenix, AZ 85004
     Tel: (602) 256-6000
     Fax: (602) 252-4712
     E-mail: hbarnes@allenbarneslaw.com
             dnelson@allenbarneslaw.com

                About Florence Hospital At Anthem

Based in Florence, Arizona, Florence Hospital at Anthem is a
general acute-care hospital with 36-beds and provides a full range
of diagnostic care including digital X-ray, CT scan, MRI,
ultrasound, ECHO ultrasound and nuclear medicine. Florence Hospital
opened on March 8, 2012.

Gilbert Hospital -- http://www.gilberter.com/-- opened in
February, 2006 and was the first full service, acute care hospital
in the Town of Gilbert.

FHA and Gilbert Hospital were founded by Doctor Timothy Johns.

On March 6, 2013, Florence Hospital at Anthem, LLC, filed its
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  

On Feb. 5, 2014, GH filed its petition under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code. (Case No. 14-01451).

FHA's joint plan of reorganization became effective in 2016.

Alleged creditors Wes Richardson, Timothy Johns, and Zubair Tahir
filed an involuntary petition against Florence Hospital at Anthem
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-04537) on April 25, 2018.

Jerry Seelig, was the appointed Patient Care Ombudsman of FHA.  The
PCO hired Allen Barnes & Jones, PLC, as counsel.


FLORENCE HOSPITAL: PCO Hires Seelig Cussigh as Consultant
---------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Seelig, the Patient Care Ombudsman of Florence Hospital At
Anthem, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates, seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona to employ Seelig
Cussigh HCO LLC, as consultant to the PCO.

The PCO requires Seelig Cussigh to:

   a. assist the PCO in his immediate efforts to assess patient
      care;

   b. audit the Debtor's efforts at maintaining the privacy of
      patient confidential information and determining if that
      information is secure and available when need by
      appropriate parties;

   c. interview patients, physicians, Chief Nursing Officer and
      other Hospital staff;

   d. assist the PCO in his efforts to assess key life and safety
      requirements, which must be met to ensure quality patient
      care; and

   e. assist the PCO in completing the required PCO Report and
      any final reports or any pleadings required under the
      Bankruptcy Code.

Seelig Cussigh will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Charlie Hicks              $275
     Richard Cussigh            $375
     Sean Drake                 $275

Seelig Cussigh will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Jerry Seelig, partner of Seelig Cussigh HCO LLC, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Seelig Cussigh can be reached at:

     Jerry Seelig
     SEELIG CUSSIGH HCO LLC
     4275 Baldwin Ave.
     Culver City, CA 90232
     Tel: (310) 841-2549
     Fax: (310) 841-2842

                About Florence Hospital At Anthem

Based in Florence, Arizona, Florence Hospital at Anthem is a
general acute-care hospital with 36-beds and provides a full range
of diagnostic care including digital X-ray, CT scan, MRI,
ultrasound, ECHO ultrasound and nuclear medicine. Florence Hospital
opened on March 8, 2012.

Gilbert Hospital -- http://www.gilberter.com/-- opened in
February, 2006 and was the first full service, acute care hospital
in the Town of Gilbert.

FHA and Gilbert Hospital were founded by Doctor Timothy Johns.

On March 6, 2013, Florence Hospital at Anthem, LLC, filed its
petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  

On Feb. 5, 2014, Gilbert Hospital, LLC, filed its petition under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. (Case No. 14-01451).

FHA's joint plan of reorganization became effective in 2016.

Alleged creditors Wes Richardson, Timothy Johns, and Zubair Tahir
filed an involuntary petition against Florence Hospital at Anthem
(Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 18-04537) on April 25, 2018.

Jerry Seelig, was the appointed Patient Care Ombudsman of FHA.  The
PCO hired Allen Barnes & Jones, PLC, as counsel.


FORASTERO INC: Taps Daniel Burdak as Real Estate Broker
-------------------------------------------------------
Forastero, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to hire a real estate broker.

The Debtor proposes to employ Daniel Burdak, a real estate broker
in Florida, in connection with the sale of its real property
located at 2 Tahiti Beach Island Road, Coral Gables, Florida.

Mr. Burdak will get a commission of 6% of the total sales price.
The sales price is $9.9 million.

In a court filing, Mr. Burdak disclosed that he does not represent
any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estate.

Mr. Burdak maintains an office at:

     Daniel S. Burdak
     905 Brickell Bay Drive
     Tower 2, Lobby, Suite 227
     Miami, FL 33131

                       About Forastero Inc.

Forastero, Inc., listed its business as a single asset real estate
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).

Based in Coral Gables, Florida, Forastero filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-13397) on March 23, 2018.
In the petition signed by Marie C. Vallejo, authorized
representative, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert A Mark.

Richard R. Robles, Esq., and Nicholas G. Rosoletti, Esq., at the
law firm Richard R Robles, PA, serve as the Debtor's counsel.


FORASTERO INC: Taps Reiner & Reiner as Special Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Forastero, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of Florida to hire Reiner & Reiner, P.A., as
special counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the collection of a $500,000
judgment it obtained against Segal Properties, LLC, related to a
breach of their real estate sales agreement; and to continue
representing the Debtor in the appeal filed by Segal.

Monica Tirado, Esq., at Reiner, disclosed in a court filing that
she and her firm do not represent any interest adverse to the
Debtor and its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Monica Tirado, Esq.
     Reiner & Reiner, P.A.
     One Datran Center
     9100 So. Dadeland Blvd., Suite 901
     Miami, FL 33156
     Phone: (305) 670-8282
     Email: mtirado@reinerslaw.com

                       About Forastero Inc.

Forastero, Inc., listed its business as a single asset real estate
as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B).  Based in Coral Gables,
Florida, Forastero, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Fla. Case No. 18-13397) on March 23, 2018.  In the petition signed
by Marie C. Vallejo, authorized representative, the Debtor
estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $1 million to
$10 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert A Mark.

Richard R. Robles, Esq., and Nicholas G. Rosoletti, Esq., at the
law firm Richard R Robles, PA, serve as the Debtor's counsel.


FREELINC TECHNOLOGIES: Taps American Legal Claims as Claims Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FreeLinc Technologies, Inc., and FreeLinc Technologies, LLC, seek
authority from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Delaware (Delaware) to hire American Legal Claims Services, LLC
as the Debtors' notice, claims and balloting agent.

Services ALCS will provide are:

     a. prepare and serve required notices in the Chapter 11 case;

     b. within five days after mailing of a particular notice, file
with the Court a proof of service including a service list with the
names and addresses of each party served and the manner of
service;

     c. receive, examine, and maintain copies of all proofs of
claim and proofs of interest filed in this bankruptcy case;

     d. maintain the official register of claims and interests by
docketing all claims and interests in a claims database;

     e. record all transfers of claim pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule
3001(e);

     f. revise the creditor matrix if necessary;

     g. record any order entered by the Court, which may affect a
proof of claim or interest, in the claim register;

     h. monitor the Court's docket for any pleading related to a
claim or interest and adjusting the claim register accordingly;

     i. file a complete claim register with the Court on a
quarterly basis or more regularly if requested by the Clerk's
office;

     j. maintain an up-to-date mailing list of all creditors and
all entities who have filed proofs of claim or proofs of interest
and/or requests for notices in the case and prove such list to the
Court or any other requesting party within 48 hours;

     k. provide access to the public for examination of claims and
the claims register during the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
(prevailing Eastern Time), Monday through Friday at no charge;

     l. create and maintain an informational website;

     m. forward all claims, an updated claims register and an
updated mailing list to the Court within 10 days of an entry of an
order converting the case to chapter 7 or within 30 days of entry
of a final decree;

     n. implement necessary security measures to ensure the
completeness and integrity of the claims register;

     o. comply with applicable federal, state, municipal and local
statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, and other
requirements;

     p. provide temporary employees to assist in any aspect of
employment requirements;

     q. promptly comply with such further conditions and
requirements as the Clerk's Office or the Court may at any time
prescribe;

     r. provide such other claims processing, noticing, and
administrative services as may be requested from time to time by
the Debtors;

     s. assist with plan solicitation and balloting; and

     t. provide assistance relating to disbursements under the
Debtors' plan.

Jeffrey Pirrung, Managing Director of American Legal Claims
Services, LLC, attests that ALCS is a "disinterested person" as
that term is defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeffrey Pirrung
     American Legal Claims Services, LLC
     8021 Philips Highway, STE 1
     Jacksonville, FL 32265

                   About FreeLinc Technologies

Headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, FreeLinc Technologies --
http://www.freelinc.com/-- is a research and development company
focused on the adoption of Near Field Magnetic Induction (NFMI) as
a new wireless standard in the public safety, military, healthcare
and consumer markets.  FreeLinc's NFMI solves the security and
reliability problems for Bluetooth and the reading distance
problems for NFC.  FreeLinc claims to be the world's only provider
of its NFMI-enabled products and solutions, and has 43+ patents to
protect its position.

FreeLinc Technologies, Inc. and FreeLinc Technologies, LLC
concurrently filed voluntary petitions for relief  under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 18-11254 and
18-11255, respectively) on May 24, 2018.  In the petitions signed
by Dr. Michael S. Abrams, CEO, both debtors estimated $1 million to
$10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.

William Pierce Bowden, Esq., Katharina Earle, Esq. and Gregory A
Taylor, Esq. at ASHBY & GEDDES, P.A., serve as counsel to the
Debtors.


FURNITURE FACTORY: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral Until June 30
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Mary Jo Heston of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Washington has entered an order extending
Furniture Factory Direct, Inc.'s use of cash collateral in order to
continue to operate its business until June 30, 2018 in accordance
with the budget.

The Debtor will note a hearing on extension of the Cash Collateral
Order, if necessary, to be conducted on June 21, 2018 at 9:00 a.m.

The Debtor will make rent payments to Landlords for the following
leasehold by the 10th of each month.

     (a) Bellevue Store at 2209 Bel-Red Rd. Redmond, WA 98052,
$26,302;

     (b) Tukwila Store at 16705 Southcenter Parkway, WA 98188 (for
April and May), $27,763;

     (c) Lakewood Store at 2402 84th St. S. Tacoma, WA 98444,
$52,008.43; and

     (d) Lacy Store at 5420 Martin Way E. Lacey WA 98516,
$45,398.59;

The Debtor will make payments to Bank of America in the amount of
$3,500 as adequate protection of Bank of America's interest in
estate assets.  In addition, Bank of America is granted a
replacement lien in the Debtor's postpetition assets (including the
cash collateral) of the same kind, type, and nature as the
prepetition collateral that are acquired after the Petition Date
and in the same priority, relative to other liens (if any), Bank of
America held on a prepetition basis.  The replacement lien will be
in the same priority, validity and enforceability as any
prepetition lien securing the claim of Bank of America in the same
type of assets.

As additional adequate protection to Bank of America, the Debtor
will:

    (a) continue to maintain adequate insurance on its assets;

    (b) provide weekly reports to Bank of America of activity and
balances of the Debtor's operating accounts no longer maintained at
Bank of America, including weekly deposits, weekly disbursements,
and weekly cash balances, which weekly reports will be provided on
Friday of each week for the week ending on Tuesday of the same
week; and

    (c) timely provide monthly reports as required by the United
States Trustee.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/wawb18-40718-245.pdf

                   About Furniture Factory Direct

Furniture Factory Direct, Inc., is a furniture retail business
known as Furniture FactoryDirect.  It has six retail locations as
well as a warehouse facility located in Fife, Washington.

Furniture Factory Direct filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.
Wash. Case No. 18-40718) on March 5, 2018.  The Debtor is
represented by Masafumi Iwama, Esq., S. Lamont Bossard, Jr., Esq.,
and Mark C. McClure, Esq., at Iwama Law Firm, in Kent, Washington.


FUTURE DIE CAST: Seeks to Hire Steinberg Shapiro as Attorney
------------------------------------------------------------
Future Die Cast Acquisitions, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to employ
Steinberg Shapiro & Clark, as attorney to the Debtor.

Future Die Cast requires Steinberg Shapiro to represent the Debtor
in all matters relating to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

Steinberg Shapiro will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Mark H. Shapiro             $350
     Geoffrey T. Pavlic          $285
     Tracy M. Clark              $275
     Legal Assistant              $95

The Debtor paid Steinberg Shapiro a retainer in the amount of
$47,000 on April 18, 2018.  The amount of $21,721 of the retainer
was applied to services performed prior to the filing of the
bankruptcy case and the filing fee, leaving a balance of $25,280,
held in the firm's trust account.

Steinberg Shapiro will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Geoffrey T. Pavlic, a partner at Steinberg Shapiro, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Steinberg Shapiro can be reached at:

     Geoffrey T. Pavlic, Esq.
     STEINBERG SHAPIRO & CLARK
     25925 Telegraph Road, Suite 203
     Southfield, MI 48033
     Tel: (248) 352-4700
     E-mail: pavlic@steinbergshapiro.com

               About Future Die Cast Acquisitions

Future Die Cast & Engineering, Inc., owns an automotive shop in
Shelby Township, Michigan. The Company manufactures tooling and
machined castings for high pressure die cast prototypes. The
company also engages in producing tooling and machined castings for
low to medium volume production and service parts manufacturing.

Future Die Cast & Engineering, based in Shelby Twp., MI, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 18-46210) on April
27, 2018.  In the petition signed by Mason Richardson, president,
the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities.  The Hon. Mark A. Randon presides over the case.
Geoffrey T. Pavlic, Esq., at Steinberg Shapiro & Clark, serves as
bankruptcy counsel.


GARCES RESTAURANT: Taps Omni Management as Claims Agent
-------------------------------------------------------
Garces Restaurant Group, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey to hire Omni
Management Group, Inc., as its claims and administrative agent.

The services to be provided by the firm include claims management;
distribution of notices; and plan solicitation, tabulation and
distribution; and post-petition case administration-related matter.


Omni will charge these hourly rates:

     Analyst                      $25 to $40
     Consultant                   $50 to $125
     Senior Consultant           $140 to $155
     Equity Services                 $175  
     Technology/Programming       $85 to $135  

Paul Deutch, senior vice-president of Omni, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Omni can be reached through:

     Paul H. Deutch
     Omni Management Group
     1120 Avenue of the Americas, 4th Floor
     New York, NY 10036
     Tel: 212-302-3580
     Fax: 212-302-3820
     Email: nycontact@omnimgt.com

                 About Garces Restaurant Group

Garces Restaurant Group, Inc., which conducts business under the
name Garces Group, is a Philadelphia-based hospitality group
operating more than a dozen restaurants from Philadelphia to New
York City, including Amada, Distrito, Tinto, Village Whiskey,
Garces Trading Company, JG Domestic, Volver, The Olde Bar, Buena
Onda, Ortzi, a Spanish Basque-inspired restaurant, at the new LUMA
Hotel Times Square and three restaurants, Okatshe, Olon and Bar
Olon at Tropicana Atlantic City.  Garces Events is a full-service
catering and event division with exclusive venues such as Kimmel
Center for the Performing Arts, Cira Centre and CHUBB Hotel &
Conference Center, among others.  The group also offers additional
services through the Garces Foundation, a philanthropic
organization dedicated to Philadelphia's underserved immigrant
community; and Luna Farm, Chef Garces' 40-acre farm in Bucks
County, Pennsylvania.  

Garces Restaurant Group and its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Lead Case No.
18-19054) on May 2, 2018.

In the petitions signed by John Fioretti, interim CEO, Garces
Restaurant estimated assets of $100,000 to $500,000 and liabilities
of $1 million to $10 million.  

Judge Jerrold N. Poslusny Jr. presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C., as their legal
counsel; Eisneramper LLP as financial advisor; and Cohnreznick
Capital Market Securities, LLC as investment banker and placement
agent.


GARDENS REGIONAL: Order Denying DHCS Administrative Claim Upheld
----------------------------------------------------------------
The appeals case captioned CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE
SERVICES, Appellant, v. GARDENS REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL
CENTER, INC., Appellee, Case No. CV 17-7436 DSF (C.D. Cal.) arises
from the bankruptcy court's Sept. 25, 2017 order denying Appellant
California Department of Health Care Services' (DHCS) Motion for
Allowance of an Administrative Priority Claim. District Judge Dale
S. Fischer affirms the Bankruptcy Court's order.

Here, the record supports the Bankruptcy Court's conclusion that
DCHS could have fairly or reasonably contemplated its Hospital
Quality Assurance Fee claim prior to Debtor's Petition. As in In re
SNTL Corp., In re Jensen, and other Ninth Circuit cases, at the
time the Petition was filed, the debt was "absolutely owed" under
the applicable state law as well as the Medi-Cal Provider Agreement
that Debtor executed with DCHS. That the liability did not become
due until post-petition does not alter the fact that the claim
arose from prepetition obligations and agreements and so existed
prepetition. Put another way, even if DHCS did not know, prior to
the Petition, the amount of its claim, it could fairly contemplate
the existence of its claim. This is sufficient to satisfy the fair
contemplation test.

The Court also agrees with the Bankruptcy Court that DHCS had a
better estimate of its claim than the claimant in Jensen and other
cases. It found that pursuant to the Reimbursement Improvement Act,
HQA Fees are assessed based on a DHCS-developed fee model (Fee
Model) that must be approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services. The Bankruptcy Court went on to find that the Fee Model
in this case was approved by CMS prepetition, in January 2015, and
that once approved, DHCS then calculated the HQA Fees owed by each
hospital, using data that the hospitals are required to supply.
Although the Debtor's obligation could change, DHCS had a fairly
clear picture as to the amount of its claim.

DHCS also argues that its right to payment should be treated as
post-petition because Debtor failed to comply with applicable
non-bankruptcy law after filing for bankruptcy. In support, DHCS
primarily relies on In re Bill's Coal Co. and In re Motel
Investments, Inc., which deal with fines or penalties imposed for
post-petition misconduct. The claim here is neither a fine nor a
penalty levied on Debtor for post-petition conduct; rather, it is a
liability that arose from prepetition legislation imposing
obligations on the Debtor, which are merely contingent on the
hospital continuing to operate post-petition.

The Court concludes that DHCS is not entitled to administrative
priority because any claim it may have on account of the Debtor's
unpaid HQA Fee obligation arose prepetition.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 11, 2018 Memorandum Opinion is
available at https://bit.ly/2HwdCwS from Leagle.com.

California Department of Health Care Services, (DHCS), Appellant,
represented by Kenneth Kai-Chun Wang , Office of the Attorney
General California Department of Justice.

Gardens Regional Hospital and Medical Center, Inc., Appellee,
represented by John A. Moe, II  -- john.moe@dentons.com -- Dentons
US LLP, Samuel R. Maizel -- Samuel.maizel@dentons.com -- Dentons
LLP & Tania M. Moyron -- Tania.moyron@dentons.com -- Dentons US
LLP.

                      About the Hospital

Gardens Regional Hospital and Medical Center, Inc., formerly known
as Tri-City Regional Medical Center, doing business as Gardens
Regional Hospital and Medical Center leases a 137- bed, acute care
hospital doing business at 21530 South Pioneer Boulevard, Hawaiian
Gardens, Los Angeles, California. It provides a full range of
inpatient and outpatient services, including, but not limited to,
medical acute care, general surgical services, bariatric surgery
services (for weight loss), spine surgery services, orthopedic and
sports medicine and joint replacement services, wound care and pain
management services, physical therapy, respiratory therapy,
outpatient ambulatory services, diagnostic services, radiology and
inpatient/outpatient imaging services, laboratory and pathology
services, geriatric services, and community wellness and education
programs.

Gardens Regional filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-17463) on June 6, 2016, estimating its assets
between $1 million and $10 million, and liabilities between $10
million and $50 million.  The petition was signed by Brian Walton,
chairman of the Board.  Judge Ernest M. Robles presides over the
case.  Samuel R Maizel, Esq., and John A Moe, Esq., at Dentons US
LLP, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors of Gardens Regional Hospital and Medical
Center, Inc.  As of September 2016, the remaining members of the
committee are Rob Speeney of Cardinal Health 200, LLC, and Robert
Zadek of Lenders Funding, LLC.


GENTIVA HEALTH: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned ratings to Gentiva Health
Services, Inc., the borrower that will encompass the home health
and hospice operations (Kindred at Home, or KAH) being carved out
of Kindred Healthcare Inc. (B2 direction uncertain). Moody's
assigned a Corporate Family Rating (CFR) of B2 and a Probability of
Default Rating (PDR) of B2-PD. Moody's assigned a B1 to the
proposed first lien senior secured credit facilities and a Caa1 to
the second lien term loan. The outlook is stable.

The proceeds of the debt will be used to facilitate the acquisition
of KAH by a buyer consortium comprised of TPG Capital, Welsh,
Carson, Anderson & Stowe (WCAS) and health insurer Humana Inc.
(Baa3 senior unsecured rating). As part of the transaction, the
private equity firms will contribute about $1 billion of equity and
will own 60% of KAH. Humana will contribute $666 million of equity
for the remaining 40% stake. Over time it is expected that Humana
will acquire the remaining stake in the business through a put/call
mechanism. Subsequent to the closing of the transaction, KAH will
acquire Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. (B3 direction
uncertain) for approximately $1.4 billion. The proceeds of the debt
being rated, along with incremental cash equity contributed by TPG,
WCAS and Humana will fund the acquisition of Curo.

Moody's will withdraw all ratings at Kindred Healthcare, Inc. and
Curo Health Services when the acquisitions close and all existing
debt is repaid.

Gentiva Health Services, Inc.

Ratings assigned:

Corporate Family Rating, B2

Probability of Default Rating, B2-PD

$1,360 million senior secured first lien term loan due 2025, B1
(LGD3)

$850 million delayed draw senior secured term loan due 2025, B1
(LGD3)

$280 million senior secured first lien revolving credit facilities
due 2023, B1 (LGD3)

$70 million delayed draw senior secured revolving credit facilities
due 2023, B1 (LGD3)

$475 million second lien term loan due 2026, Caa1 (LGD6)

The rating outlook is stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 CFR reflects the company's very high debt/EBITDA following
the leveraged buyout transaction and acquisition of Curo. There is
significant risk associated with the carve-out from Kindred, the
establishment of stand-alone operations and the concurrent
integration of Curo. The rating is also constrained by the high
exposure to Medicare and Medicaid in the home care and hospice
businesses as well as the considerable risk of adverse government
reimbursement changes. Further, Moody's anticipates that the
company will continue to be acquisitive as it consolidates the
highly fragmented home care and hospice industries.

Supporting the B2 rating is Humana's ownership stake in KAH.
Moody's believes that Humana will work with KAH to expand the scope
of services offered to Humana's Medicare Advantage memberships by
KAH, providing an important source of potential growth for KAH.
Further, Moody's believes the risk of aggressive debt funded
dividends is low given Humana's eventual full ownership of the
company. Further, despite the very high debt/EBITDA KAH will have
minimal capital expenditures and cash taxes due to large net
operating losses (NOLs). As a result, Moody's expects the company
will generate substantial free cash flow before integration and
restructuring costs. Further, Moody's believes that cost saving
initiatives and synergies with Curo will enhance earnings and cash
flow, although it will take several years for KAH to fully realize
the benefits. Lastly, the rating is supported by KAH's good scale,
with roughly $3 billion of pro forma revenue, in an industry with
good long-term demand fundamentals.

Moody's anticipates good liquidity supported by an undrawn $350
million revolving credit facility (inclusive of the delayed draw
facility), and no financial maintenance covenants on the term
loans. While Moody's expects weak free cash flow in the first
several quarters after the transactions close due to one-time
expenses, the business should generate consistently positive free
cash flow on a normalized basis.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that the company will
remain highly leveraged but will have good liquidity to support the
transition to a stand-alone company and integration with Curo.

The ratings could be upgraded if KAH successfully transitions to a
stand-alone company and integrates Curo. Once that is completed,
Moody's could upgrade the ratings if the company generates a track
record of good free cash flow and debt/EBITDA sustained below
5.5x.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company experiences material
operating disruption from the carve-out or integration of Curo; if
stand-alone costs are ultimately significantly greater than
anticipated or if cost-savings and synergies fail to materialize.
The ratings could also be downgraded if there is material weakening
of liquidity or if the company is not expected to generate
consistently positive free cash flow.

Gentiva Health Services (doing business as Kindred at Home) is one
of the largest home health and hospice operators in the US. Pro
forma revenues will approximate $3 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.


GOLF CARS: Unsecured Creditors to Get 25% Over 120 Months
---------------------------------------------------------
Golf Cars of West Texas, LLC, D/B/A Lubbock Outdoor Sports and
Abilene Outdoor Sports, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Texas a combined plan of reorganization
and disclosure statement, on June 30, 2018.

For Class 4 Unsecured Claims, the Debtor will pay 25% of each
respective over a 120 month period at 0.0% interest beginning
August 15, 2018. Each monthly payment will be $370.56.

The plan provides that Jeffrey Todd Stevenson retains his ownership
interest.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-10312-84.pdf

                  About Golf Cars of West Texas

Golf Cars of West Texas, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-10312) on Dec. 4,
2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of
less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  Judge
Robert L. Jones presides over the case.  Tarbox Law P.C. is the
Debtor's legal counsel.


GRIER BROS: Unsecureds to be Paid $2K in Quarterly Distributions
----------------------------------------------------------------
Grier Bros. Enterprises, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia a disclosure statement for its
plan of reorganization dated May 29, 2018, which contemplates the
reorganization and ongoing business operations of the Debtor.

Class 5 consists of the General Unsecured Claims of the Debtor.
Beginning the 15th day of the 6th month following the Effective
Date, the Debtor will make quarterly pro-rata distributions to
Holders of Allowed Class 5 Claims in the amount of $2,000. Such
$2,000 payments will continue every third month for a total of
eight payments to holders of Allowed Class 5 Claims. The total
Class 5 distribution will equal $16,000, to the extent that the
allowed amount of unsecured claims are less than $16,000, payments
will cease when the principal balance of the unsecured claims are
paid in full. The Debtor anticipates or projects that such
aggregate $16,000 distribution will represent a 100% distribution
(dividend) on the outstanding Class 5 Claims. The Debtor is in the
process of reviewing potential Class 5 Claims and specifically
reserves the right to object to the allowance of any claim. The
percentage distribution is subject to change based upon the
aggregate amount of the Allowed Class 5 Claims after the Debtor’s
full analysis of the same.

The main source of funds for the payments in the plan is the
ongoing business operations of Debtor as well as an infusion of new
value.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb17-56817-109.pdf

               About Grier Bros. Enterprises, Inc.

Based in Atlanta, Georgia, Grier Bros. Enterprises, Inc., provides
trucking or transfer services.  Grier Bros. Enterprises sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga.
Case No. 17-56817) on April 13, 2017. The petition was signed by
Wayne Grier, president.  The Debtor estimated its assets and debts
at $1 million to $10 million.  Herbert C. Broadfoot, II, Esq., at
Herbert C. Broadfoot II, PC, serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


H N HINCKLEY: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Until June 21
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Massachusetts authorized H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc.'s
further use of cash collateral on an interim basis in accordance
with its fourth supplemental budget through the continued hearing
which will be held on June 21, 2018 at 10:30 a.m.

A copy of the Order is available at

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab18-10398-78.pdf

                     About H N Hinckley & Sons

H N Hinckley & Sons, Inc., headquartered in Vineyard Haven,
Massachusetts, is a dealer of building material and supplies.  H N
Hinckley & Sons filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 18-10398) on Feb. 6, 2018.  In the petition signed by Wayne M.
Guyther III, president, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
at $1 million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Joan
N. Feeney.  The Debtor tapped Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP as
its legal counsel. Schlossberg LLC is the special counsel.


HARDES HOLDING: Unsecureds to Get 100% with 3% Interest Under Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardes Holding, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of South Dakota a disclosure statement and plan, to
provide realistic and acceptable recoveries to each class of
creditors.

Class 1 which is Sandton Credit SolutionsMaster Fund III, will be
paid $1,280.224.41 at confirmation of plan. The total debt owed to
this creditor is in the approximate amount of $7,010,982.76, but as
a concession, the Debtor will pay the amount of $8,755,376.25, with
Plan rate of interest. This creditor will be paid interest at a
rate of 4% per annum on the principal of this debt only, as
amortized over a thirty (30) year term with a 15 year balloon. The
annual payment to this creditor will be in the amount of
$560,448.82.

Class 2 which is Swenson Partnership debt owed to this creditor is
approximately $769,513.64 and will be paid interest at a rate of 4%
per annum as amortized over a twenty-five (25) year term, with a 15
year balloon. The annual payment to this creditor will be in the
amount of $48,554.29, with the first annual payment being due on or
before December 15, 2018, and continuing annually thereafter.

Class 4 which will consist of all unsecured creditors, (except
Class 3 - Administrative Convenience Unsecured Creditor Class),
with claims that exceed $14,000.00, who have timely filed a Proof
of Claim which is not objected to or listed on Debtor’s Schedules
or Amendments, as being disputed, contingent or unliquidated, or
those creditors who obtained a Court Order allowing their claim.
The Debtor estimates this Class of creditors to consist of
approximately 1 creditor and is owed a total amount of $53,200.00.

Holders of Class 4 Claims will be paid 100% with interest at 3.0%,
payments of $13,380.00, annually starting Dec. 15, 2018, until paid
in full.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/sdb17-30039-88.pdf

                      About Hardes Holding

Based in Miller, South Dakota, Hardes Holding, LLC, is in the
business of grain farming & real estate rental.  Hardes Holding
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.S.D. Case No. 17-30039) on
Dec. 4, 2017.  Wade Hardes, authorized representative, signed the
petition.  As of Dec. 4, 2017, the Debtor had total assets of
$21.42 million and liabilities amounting to $11.17 million.

The Hon. Charles L. Nail, Jr., presides over the case.  Clair R.
Gerry, Esq., at Gerry& Kulm Ask, Prof. LLC, is the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.


HAWAIIAN SPRINGS: Asks Court to Approve Proposed Plan Outline
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hawaiian Springs, LLC, and the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors filed a motion asking the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Hawaii to approve their disclosure statement in support
of their proposed chapter 11 plan of reorganization dated May 29,
2018.

The Plan Proponents assert that the proposed Disclosure Statement
contains the requisite information regarding the classification and
treatment of creditors, a detailed description of the history of
the Debtor, its assets and liabilities, and summary of
post-petition developments, tax implications, and the means for
implementation of the Plan. The Disclosure Statement satisfies the
standard for adequacy under section 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The Plan Proponents also request the Court set the following date
and deadlines for balloting and objections:

   a. Confirmation Hearing Date: Approximately two months from the
hearing date on this motion (late August 2018).

   b. Deadline to Serve Solicitation Package: At least 45 days
prior to the Confirmation Hearing Date.

   c. Balloting Deadline: 4:00 p.m. on the day that is 14 calendar
days before the Confirmation Hearing.

   d. Deadline to File Objections to Confirmation of Plan: 14 days
prior to the Confirmation Hearing.

   e. Deadline to Submit Ballot Tabulation: Seven days prior to the
Confirmation Hearing.

   f. Deadline to File Reply and Confirmation Brief: Seven days
prior to the Confirmation Hearing.

                    About Hawaiian Springs

Hawaiian Springs, LLC -- https://www.hawaiianspringswater.com/ --
is a manufacturer and distributor of bottled spring water based in
Honolulu, Hawaii.  The company's water is drawn from an artesian
well in the little town of Kea'au. It began its operations in
February 1995 serving the island and other Asian market.

Hawaiian Springs sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Hawaii Case No. 17-01348) on Dec. 29,
2017.  In the petition signed by CEO Tamiko Broms, the Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Robert J. Faris presides over the case.

Hawaiian Springs hired Choi & Ito as its legal counsel.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors tapped Rush Moore
LLP, as attorney.


HFOTCO LLC: S&P Assigns 'BB-' Rating to New Secured Term Loan
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said that it assigned its 'BB-' issue-level
rating and '3' recovery rating to HFOTCO LLC's proposed senior
secured term loan. The '3' recovery rating reflects S&P's
expectations of meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate 55%) recovery
in the event of default.

The company intends to use net proceeds to refinance the existing
term loan due 2021, repay the existing revolver, and fund general
corporate purposes.

HFOTCO owns and operates a marine terminal on the U.S. Gulf Coast.
The company stores, blends, and transports residual and crude oil.
The terminal consists of 16.8 million barrels of storage with an
additional 1.45 million barrels of crude oil tankage under
construction. S&P's 'BB-' corporate credit rating and stable
outlook on HFOTCO are unchanged. As of March 31, 2018, the company
had about $816 million of debt.

  RATINGS LIST

  HFOTCO LLC
   Corporate credit rating                       BB-/Stable/--

  Ratings Assigned
   Proposed senior secured term loan             BB-
    Recovery rating                              3


HOUSTON BLUEBONNET: Taps Cokinos Young as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Houston Bluebonnet, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire Cokinos Young as
special counsel.

The firm will represent the Debtor in connection with the
post-verdict appeal of the lawsuit styled Daniel R. Japhet, et al.,
v. Kenneth R. Lyle, et al. (Adversary Proceeding No. 16-03225).

Anthony Golz, Esq., a principal of Cokinos and the attorney who
will be providing the services, charges an hourly fee of $450.
Paralegals charge $175 per hour.

Cokinos is holding a retainer in the sum of $5,000.

The firm and its attorneys do not represent any creditor in the
Debtor's case, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Anthony T. Golz, Esq.
     1221 Lamar St., Floor 16
     Houston, TX 77010-3039
     Phone: 713-535-5500
     Fax: 713-535-5533
     E-mail: agolz@cokinoslaw.com

                    About Houston Bluebonnet

Houston Bluebonnet, LLC, is a Texas limited liability company
formed Dec. 5, 2007.  Houston Bluebonnet owns and manages a working
interest in two producing oil and gas wells under an operating
agreement for an oil, gas and mineral lease covering 20 acres in
Brazoria County, Texas.  The value of its working interest
fluctuates with the price of oil.  As of the filing of this
bankruptcy case, the Company valued its working interest at
$90,000, based on the tax-assessed value calculated from the sales
in 2015.

Houston Bluebonnet filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D.
Tex. Case No. 16-34850) on Sept. 30, 2016.  In the petition signed
by Allyson Davis, authorized representative, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.

H. Miles Cohn, Esq., at Crain, Caton & James, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  Gary E. Ellison, PC, and Snelling Law
Firm serve as special counsel.


HOVNANIAN ENTERPRISES: Incurs $9.8 Million Net Loss in Q2
---------------------------------------------------------
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $9.82 million for the three months ended April 30, 2018,
compared to a net loss of $6.68 million for the three months ended
April 30, 2017.  

For the six months ended April 30, 2018, Hovnanian reported a net
loss of $40.63 million compared to a net loss of $6.82 million on
$1.13 billion of total revenues for the same period a year ago.

Total revenues decreased 14.2% to $502.5 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2018, compared with $585.9 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2017.  For the six months ended April 30, 2018,
total revenues decreased 19.2% to $919.7 million compared with
$1.14 billion in the first half of the prior year.

As of April 30, 2018, Hovnanian had $1.64 billion in total assets,
$2.14 billion in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $499.97 million.

"We are encouraged that the number of consolidated lots controlled
increased year-over-year for the second consecutive quarter.  In
order to drive future growth in revenues and profitability, we
continue to focus on growing our community count through increased
investments in land and land development," stated Ara K. Hovnanian,
chairman of the Board, president and chief executive officer.  "As
expected, our operating results for the second quarter of fiscal
2018 improved sequentially.  Additionally, our gross margin
percentage and contracts per community, including unconsolidated
joint ventures, continued to exhibit signs of strength, which was
evident in year-over-year improvements for both metrics.
Throughout the spring selling season, most of our communities
experienced solid traffic and robust demand for new homes.  We
reported 11.2 contracts per community for the second quarter of
fiscal 2018, which is the highest level of contracts per community
we have reported for any quarter since the fourth quarter of
2005."

Commenting on the successful resolution of the litigation matter
involving Solus Alternative Asset Management LP, J. Larry Sorsby
executive vice president and chief financial officer, said, "We are
pleased that last week the lawsuit filed by Solus with respect to
our financing transaction with GSO was dismissed, which concludes
this matter on favorable terms for us.  All of the benefits to our
company provided in our GSO financing commitments remain completely
intact."

"Provided there are no adverse changes in current market
conditions, we expect further improvements in our operations
resulting in solid profitability during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2018.  Revenue growth from continued investments in new
communities will allow us to leverage our total SG&A and interest
costs, which we expect will lead to higher levels of profitability
in future years.  Furthermore, an improving economic backdrop,
coupled with positive demographic trends, should result in more
normalized levels of activity in the national housing market,"
concluded Mr. Hovnanian.

Results for the Three-Month and Six-Month Periods Ended April 30,
2018:

   * Homebuilding revenues for unconsolidated joint ventures
     increased 12.0% to $96.9 million for the second quarter ended
     April 30, 2018, compared with $86.6 million in last year's
     second quarter.  During the first six months of fiscal 2018,
     homebuilding revenues for unconsolidated joint ventures
     increased 2.6% to $155.5 million compared with $151.5 million

     in the same period of the previous year.

   * Homebuilding gross margin percentage, after cost of sales
     interest expense and land charges, was 13.8% for the second
     quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with 12.6% in the prior
     year's second quarter.  For the six months ended April 30,
     2018, homebuilding gross margin percentage, after cost of
     sales interest expense and land charges, improved to 14.3%
     compared with 13.0% in the first half of last year.

   * Homebuilding gross margin percentage, before cost of sales
     interest expense and land charges, improved 120 basis points
     to 17.7% for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with
     16.5% in the same quarter one year ago.  During the first six
     months of fiscal 2018, homebuilding gross margin percentage,
     before cost of sales interest expense and land charges,
     improved 100 basis points to 17.8% compared with 16.8% in the
    
     same period of the previous year.

   * Total SG&A was $61.7 million, or 12.3% of total revenues, in
     the second quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with $61.5
     million, or 10.5% of total revenues, in the second quarter of

     fiscal 2017.  For the first half of fiscal 2018, total SG&A
     was $124.1 million, or 13.5% of total revenues, compared with

     $121.6 million, or 10.7% of total revenues, in the first half

     of the prior fiscal year.

   * Interest incurred (some of which was expensed and some of
     which was capitalized) was $40.0 million for the second
     quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with $39.2 million in the
     same quarter one year ago.  For the six months ended
     April 30, 2018, interest incurred (some of which was expensed

     and some of which was capitalized) was $81.2 million compared

      with $77.9 million during the same six-month period last
      year.

    * Total interest expense was $45.5 million in the second
      quarter of fiscal 2018 compared with $42.6 million in the
      second quarter of fiscal 2017.  Total interest expense was
      $86.9 million for the first half of fiscal 2018 compared
      with $83.6 million for the same period of the prior year.

    * Loss before income taxes for the quarter ended April 30,
      2018 was $9.6 million compared to loss before income taxes
      of $7.7 million during the second quarter of fiscal 2017.
      For the first half of fiscal 2018, the loss before income
      taxes was $40.0 million compared with loss of $7.4 million
      during the first six months of fiscal 2017.

    * Loss before income taxes, excluding land-related charges,
      joint venture write-downs and loss (gain) on extinguishment
      of debt, was $5.5 million during the second quarter of both
      fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017.  For the first half of fiscal
      2018, the loss before income taxes, excluding land-related
      charges, joint venture write-downs and loss (gain) on
      extinguishment of debt, was $34.9 million compared with $9.6

      million during the first six months of fiscal 2017.

    * Contracts per community, including unconsolidated joint
      ventures, increased 8.7% to 11.2 contracts per community for

      the quarter ended April 30, 2018 compared with 10.3
      contracts per community, including unconsolidated joint
      ventures, in last year's second quarter.  Consolidated
      contracts per community decreased 2.8% to 10.6 contracts per

      community for the second quarter of fiscal 2018 compared
      with 10.9 contracts per community in the second quarter of
      fiscal 2017.

    * For May 2018, contracts per community, including
      unconsolidated joint ventures, increased 5.9% to 3.6
      contracts per community compared to 3.4 contracts per
      community for the same month one year ago.
   
    * As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018,
      community count, including unconsolidated joint ventures,
      was 153 communities, a 10.0% year-over-year decrease from
      170 communities at April 30, 2017.  Consolidated community
      count decreased 9.6% to 132 communities as of April 30, 2018

      from 146 communities at the end of the prior year’s second

      quarter.

    * The number of contracts, including unconsolidated joint
      ventures, for the second quarter ended April 30, 2018,
      decreased 2.4% to 1,706 homes from 1,748 homes for the same
      quarter last year.  The number of consolidated contracts    
      decreased 11.7% to 1,404 homes, during the second quarter of

      fiscal 2018, compared with 1,590 homes during the second
      quarter of 2017.

    * During the first half of fiscal 2018, the number of
      contracts, including unconsolidated joint ventures, was
      2,956 homes, a decrease of 3.4% from 3,060 homes during the
      first six months of fiscal 2017.  The number of consolidated

      contracts decreased 12.0% to 2,431 homes, during the six-
      month period ended April 30, 2018, compared with 2,763 homes

      in the same period of the previous year.

    * The dollar value of contract backlog, including
      unconsolidated joint ventures, as of April 30, 2018, was
      $1.34 billion, an increase of 5.6% compared with $1.27    
      billion as of April 30, 2017.  The dollar value of
      consolidated contract backlog, as of April 30, 2018,
      decreased 17.6% to $900.7 million compared with $1.09    
      billion as of April 30, 2017.

    * For the quarter ended April 30, 2018, deliveries, including  

      unconsolidated joint ventures, decreased 4.9% to 1,423 homes

      compared with 1,497 homes during the second quarter of
      fiscal 2017.  Consolidated deliveries were 1,215 homes for
      the second quarter of fiscal 2018, a 10.5% decrease compared

      with 1,358 homes during the same quarter a year ago.

    * For the six months ended April 30, 2018, deliveries,
      including unconsolidated joint ventures, decreased 11.4% to
      2,564, homes compared with 2,895 homes in the first half of
      the prior year.  Consolidated deliveries were 2,240 homes in

      the first half of fiscal 2018, a 15.4% decrease compared
      with 2,648 homes in the same period in fiscal 2017.

    * The contract cancellation rate, including unconsolidated
      joint ventures, was 17% in the second quarter of fiscal 2018
      compared with 19% during the second quarter of fiscal 2017.

      The consolidated contract cancellation rate for the three
      months ended April 30, 2018 was 17%, compared with 18% in
      the second quarter of the prior year.

    * The valuation allowance was $661.8 million as of April 30,
      2018.  The valuation allowance is a non-cash reserve against

      the Company's tax assets for GAAP purposes.  For tax
      purposes, the tax deductions associated with the tax assets
      may be carried forward for 20 years from the date the
      deductions were incurred.

Liquidity and Inventory as of April 30, 2018:

Total liquidity at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2018 was
$274.0 million.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2018, approximately 2,000 lots were
put under option or acquired in 27 communities, including
unconsolidated joint ventures.

Consolidated lots controlled increased year-over-year to 26,537, as
of April 30, 2018, from 26,103 lots at April 30, 2017.  The total
consolidated land position, as of April 30, 2018, was 26,537 lots,
consisting of 13,949 lots under option and 12,588 owned lots.

Recent Financing Transaction:

   * On May 31, 2018, the lawsuit filed by Solus with respect to
     the Company's financing transactions with GSO Capital  
     Partners LP, Blackstone's credit platform, and certain funds
     managed or advised by it was dismissed.  As part of the case
     resolution, K. Hovnanian paid the overdue interest on the
     8.0% Senior Notes due 2019 held by a subsidiary.  The case
     resolution does not involve any settlement payment or
     admission of wrongdoing by any of the Hovnanian-related
     parties.

   * In May 2018, the Company drew down approximately $70.0
     million on the delayed draw portion of the 5% unsecured term
     loan maturing in 2027 from the GSO Entities to redeem all
     outstanding 8% senior notes due 2019 other than the $26
     million held by a Hovnanian subsidiary.  The aggregate
     principal amount of the 8% senior notes redeemed was
     approximately $65.7 million.

   * The financing commitments agreed upon previously with GSO,
     which include a $125 million senior secured revolver/term
     loan and a $25 million tack-on to the Company's 10.5% senior
     secured notes due 2024, all remain intact.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                        https://is.gd/vtS89W

                     About Hovnanian Enterprises

Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., founded in 1959 by Kevork S. Hovnanian
and headquartered in Matawan, New Jersey, designs, constructs,
markets, and sells single-family detached homes, attached townhomes
and condominiums, urban infill, and active lifestyle homes in
planned residential developments.  The Company is a homebuilder
with operations in Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Texas, Virginia, Washington, D.C. and West Virginia.  The Company's
homes are marketed and sold under the trade names K. Hovnanian
Homes, Brighton Homes and Parkwood Builders.  As the developer of
K. Hovnanian's Four Seasons communities, the Company is also one of
the nation's largest builders of active lifestyle communities.

Hovnanian Enterprises reported a net loss of $332.2 million for the
year ended Oct. 31, 2017, a net loss of $2.81 million for the year
ended Oct. 31, 2016, and a net loss of $16.10 million for the year
ended Oct. 31, 2015.  As of Jan. 31, 2018, Hovnanian had $1.64
billion in total assets, $2.13 billion in total liabilities and a
total stockholders' deficit of $491.18 million.

                          *     *     *

In February 2018, Moody's Investors Service upgraded Hovnanian
Enterprises, Inc. Corporate Family Rating to "Caa1" from "Caa2" as
the company has made strides in reducing its near-to-midterm
refinancing risk and Moody's believes that Hovnanian generates
sufficient unleveraged free cash flow to cover its interest burden
in the next 12 to 18 months.

In April 2018, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Hovnanian Enterprises to 'CC' from 'CCC+'.  The downgrade
follows Hovnanian's announcement of a proposed exchange offering
for any and all of its $440 million 10% senior secured notes and
$400 million 10.5% senior secured notes for newly issued 3% senior
notes due 2047, a proposed exchange offering that S&P views as a
distressed exchange, if completed.

In June 2018, Fitch Ratings upgraded Hovnanian Enterprises' Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) to 'CCC' from 'C'.  The rating action follows
the company's announcement that it has cured the default associated
with the non-payment of interest that was due on May 1, 2018 on $26
million of 8% notes due 2019 held by K. Hovnanian at Sunrise Trail
III, LLC and the withdrawal of the exchange offer of the 10% and
10.5% notes for new 3% unsecured notes.


IDEARC INC: Verizon Can Recover Defense Costs in Spin-Off Suits
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs, v. ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants, C.A. No. N14C-06-048 WCC CCLD (Del. Super.), the
Superior Court of Delaware granted Plaintiffs Verizon
Communications, Inc., Verizon Financial Services LLC, and GTE
Corporation’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Prejudgment
Interest pursuant to Rule 58(b). Plaintiffs' Motion seeks to
resolve the remaining post-trial issues relating to Verizon's
demand for coverage of its costs in defending and settling the U.S.
Bank Action and Coticchio Action.

The lawsuit is one of four actions, which arise out of Verizon's
2006 "spin-off" of its print and electronic directories business
into a standalone company: Idearc, Inc. In November 2006, Verizon
transferred the directories business to Idearc in exchange for
Idearc common stock and promissory notes among other things.
Verizon then distributed all outstanding shares of the Idearc
common stock to Verizon shareholders and transferred the Idearc
notes and portion of the term loan to J.P. Morgan Ventures
Corporation and Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. in exchange for Verizon
debt securities the banks had purchased in the open market. The
Investment Banks then sold the Idearc debt securities to previously
solicited purchasers and lenders.

The four arise from this conduct and allege that "Verizon knew that
Idearc would be insolvent immediately after the divestiture and,
thus, should be held liable for damages resulting from Idearc's
subsequent bankruptcy."

The Plaintiffs filed the suit claiming, among other things, that
they are entitled to $48 million in defense costs relating to the
U.S. Bank Action and the Coticchio Action. Plaintiffs first moved
for partial summary judgment on the issue of defense costs in
September 2014. The Defendants opposed summary judgment and filed a
motion to allow time for discovery and Defendants relied on the
argument that U.S. Bank did not involve a "Securities Claim."

After denying the parties' initial summary judgment motions in
2015, in March 2017, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of
Plaintiffs and held that the U.S. Bank Action fell under the
definition of a securities claim.

Because the Court found in favor of Verizon, Illinois National, an
affiliate of AIG and the issuer of the primary policy, the Court
now concedes that it has determined that there is coverage under
their policy and Verizon is entitled to recovery of Defense Costs.
Illinois National Insurance Company also concedes that entry of
final judgment is proper. Insurers XL Specialty Insurance Company,
Zurich American Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company
among other insurers disagree arguing that final judgment and an
award of prejudgment interest are premature and improper at this
time.

The Court finds despite Defendants best efforts, that final
judgment is proper and there is nothing further to be litigated. If
the Excess Insurers believe that they will overpay the Plaintiffs'
Defense Costs, now is not the time to address that concern. This
litigation has been pending for many years and even after
concluding that the U.S. Bank Action is a Securities Claim,
Plaintiffs have still not been advanced their costs. This is true
in spite of the requirement to advance Defense Costs, and any
reasonable review of the Policies issued by the Excess Insurers
would clearly encompass coverage by most in the insurance tower.
Thus, the Court grants Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Final
Judgment and Prejudgment Interest.

A full-text copy of the Court's Corrected Memorandum Opinion dated
May 16, is available at https://bit.ly/2LEQrmi from Leagle.com.

Jennifer C. Wasson, Esquire  -- jwasson@potteranderson.com -- Carla
M. Jones, Esquire -- cjones@potteranderson.com -- Potter Anderson &
Corroon LLP, 1313 N. Market Street, Wilmington, DE 19801; Robin L.
Cohen, Esquire -- rcohen@mckoolsmith.com -- Keith McKenna, Esquire
-- kmckenna@mckoolsmith.com -- Michelle R. Migdon, Esquire --
mmigdon@mckoolsmith.com -- McKool Smith, P.C., One Bryant Park,
47th Floor, New York, New York, 10036, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Edward M. McNally, Esquire -- emcnally@morrisjames.com -- Meghan A.
Adams, Esquire  -- madams@morrisjames.com -- Nicolas Kravitz,
Esquire -- nkravitz@morrisjames.com -- Patricia A. Winston, Esquire
-- pwinston@morrisjames.com -- Morris James LLC, 500 Delaware
Avenue, Suite 1500, P.O. Box 2306, Wilmington, DE 19899, Attorneys
for Defendants Illinois National Insurance Company and National
Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.

John C. Phillips, Jr., Esquire -- jcp@pgmhlaw.com -- David A.
Bilson, Esquire -- dab@pgmhlaw.com -- Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin
& Hall, P.A., 1200 N. Broom Street, Wilmington, DE 19806, Attorneys
for Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company.

Douglas M. Mangel, Esquire -- doug.mangel@clydeco.us -- Joseph A.
Bailey III, Esquire -- joseph.bailey@clydeco.us -- Clyde & Co.,
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 4th Floor, Washington D.C. 20006,
Attorneys for Defendant U.S. Specialty Insurance Company.

Joel Friedlander, Esquire -- jfriedlander@friedlandergorris.com --
Christopher M. Foulds, Esquire -- cfoulds@friedlandergorris.com --
Christopher P. Quinn, Esquire -- cquinn@friedlandergorris.com --
Friedlander & Gorris, P.A., 1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2200,
Wilmington, DE 19801, Attorneys for Defendant Twin City Fire
Insurance Company.

Bruce E. Jameson, Esquire -- bejameson@prickett.com -- Kevin H.
Davenport, Esquire -- khdavenport@prickett.com -- John G. Day,
Esquire -- jgday@prickett.com -- Prickett, Jones & Elliott, P.A.,
1310 King Street, P.O. Box 1328, Wilmington, DE 19899, Attorneys
for Defendant XL Specialty Insurance Company.

Bruce W. McCullough, Esquire -- bmccullough@bodellbove.com --
Bodell Bove LLC, 1225 N. King Street, Suite 1000, P.O. Box 397,
Wilmington, DE 19899, Attorney for Defendant Zurich American
Insurance Company.

                      About Idearc Inc.

Headquartered in D/FW Airport, Texas, Idearc, Inc., now known as
SuperMedia Inc., is the second largest U.S. yellow pages publisher.
Idearc was spun off from Verizon Communications, Inc.

Idearc and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 09-31828) on March 31, 2009.  The Debtors'
financial condition as of Dec. 31, 2008, showed total assets of
$1,815,000,000 and total debts of $9,515,000,000.  Toby L. Gerber,
Esq., at Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, represented the Debtors in
their restructuring efforts.  The Debtors tapped Moelis & Company
as their investment banker; Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
their claims agent.

William T. Neary, the United States Trustee for Region 6, appointed
six creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.  The Committee selected Mark Milbank, Tweed, Hadley &
McCloy LLP, as counsel, and Haynes and Boone, LLP, co-counsel.

Idearc completed its debt restructuring and its plan of
reorganization became effective as of Dec. 31, 2009.  In connection
with its emergence from bankruptcy, Idearc changed its name to
SuperMedia Inc.  Under its reorganization, Idearc reduced its total
debt from more than $9 billion to $2.75 billion of secured bank
debt.

Less than two years since leaving bankruptcy protection, SuperMedia
remains in quandary.  Early in October 2011, Moody's Investors
Service slashed its corporate family rating for SuperMedia to Caa1
from B3 prior.  The downgrade reflects Moody's belief that revenues
will continue to decline at a double digit rate for the foreseeable
future, leading to a steady decline in free cash flow.
SuperMedia's sales were down 17% for the second quarter of 2011 in
a generally improving advertising sector.  Moody's ratings outlook
for SuperMedia remains negative.

While SuperMedia is attempting to transition the business away from
its reliance on print advertising through development of online and
mobile directory service applications, Moody's is increasingly
concerned that the company will not be able to make this change
quickly enough to stabilize the revenue base over the intermediate
term. Further, the high fixed cost nature of SuperMedia's business
could lead to steep margin compression, notwithstanding continued
aggressive cost management.


INDUSTRIAL STEEL: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Industrial Steel & Pipe Supply Company
           fdba Carbon Center Realty Corp.
        P.O. Box 307
        Saint Marys, PA 15857

Business Description: Industrial Steel & Pipe Supply Company
                      is a wholesaler of industrial equipment
                      and supplies in Saint Marys, Pennsylvania.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 8, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Pennsylvania (Erie)

Case No.: 18-10578

Judge: Hon. Thomas P. Agresti

Debtor's Counsel: Guy C. Fustine, Esq.
                  KNOX MCLAUGHLIN GORNALL & SENNETT, P.C.
                  120 West Tenth Street
                  Erie, PA 16501
                  Tel: 814-459-2800
                  E-mail: mwernick@kmgslaw.com
                          gfustine@kmgslaw.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Howard S. Lepovetsky, president.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, among other items, a
list of the Debtor's 20 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at:

                 http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb18-10578.pdf


IWORLD OF TRAVEL: Seeks to Hire Gamberg & Abrams as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
IWorld of Travel, Ltd., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Gamberg &
Abrams, as counsel to the Debtor.

IWorld of Travel requires Gamberg & Abrams to:

   a. advise the Debtor with respect to their powers and duties
      as debtor and debtor-in-possession in the continued
      management and operation of his business and properties;

   b. attend meetings and negotiate with representatives of
      creditors and other parties-in-interest and advise and
      consult on the conduct of the cases, including all of the
      legal and administrative requirements of operating in
      Chapter 11;

   c. advise the Debtor on matters relating to the evaluation of
      the assumption, rejection or assignment of unexpired
      leases and executory contracts;

   d. provide advice to the Debtor with respect to legal issues
      arising in or relating to the Debtor's ordinary course of
      business;

   e. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
      Debtor's estates, including the prosecution of actions on
      their behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against
      the estates, negotiations concerning all litigation in
      which the Debtor may be involved and objections to claims
      filed against the estate;

   f. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all motions, applications,
      answers, orders, reports and papers necessary to the
      administration of the estates;

   g. negotiate and prepare on the Debtor's behalf a plan of
      reorganization, disclosure statement and all related
      agreements and documents, and take any necessary action on
      behalf of the Debtor to obtain confirmation of such plan;

   h. attend meetings with third parties and participate in
      negotiations with respect to the above matters;

   i. appear before the Bankruptcy Court, any appellate courts,
      and the U.S. Trustee, and protect the interests of the
      Debtor's estates before such courts and the U.S. Trustee;
      and

   j. perform all other necessary legal services and provide all
      other necessary legal advice to the Debtors in connection
      with the Chapter 11 case.

Gamberg & Abrams will be paid at these hourly rates:

      Thomas L. Abrams           $450
      Jay Gamberg                $450
      Jared Gamberg              $350

On May 18, 2018, the Debtor paid Gamberg & Abrams $25,000, of which
$11,800 has been utilized for prepetition services, and the $1,717
filing fee.  The remaining balance of $11,483 is held in the firm's
trust account.

Gamberg & Abrams will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Thomas L. Abrams, name partner at Gamberg & Abrams, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Gamberg & Abrams can be reached at:

      Thomas L. Abrams, Esq.
      GAMBERG & ABRAMS
      1776 N. Pine Island Rd., Suite 215
      Plantation, FL 33322
      Tel: (954) 523-0900
      Fax: (954) 915-9016
      E-mail: tabrams@tabramslaw.com

                     About iWorld of Travel

iWorld of Travel, Ltd., f/d/b/a Isram Wholesale Tours & Travel,
Ltd. -- https://www.iworldoftravel.com/ -- is a tour operator with
its global headquarters located in Florida.  The company
concentrates primarily on four brands: Latour, for Latin America;
EuropeToo, for Europe and Morocco; Asian Vistas for Asia and Belder
Gray for Egypt, Jordan and the Middle East. Isram World of Travel
was founded in 1967.

IWorld of Travel, Ltd., based in Fort Lauderdale, FL, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 18-16485) on May 30,
2018.  In the petition signed by Richard Krieger, president, the
Debtor disclosed $63,435 in assets and $3.18 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. John K Olson presides over the case.  Thomas
L. Abrams, Esq., at Gamberg & Abrams, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


J3 GRADING: Court Denies Approval of Disclosure Statement
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brenda T. Rhoades of the U.S. Bankrtupcy Court for the
Eastern District of Texas has denied approval of the disclosure
statement filed on May 22, 2018, by J3 Grading and Hauling LC.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, general
unsecured creditors are classified in Class 5 and will receive a
distribution of 10% of their allowed claims to be distributed on a
quarterly basis over a 50 months period. Allowed Unsecured
Creditors will be paid their allowed unsecured claim on a pro-rate
basis from the Unsecured Creditors Pool.

The Debtor will remain in possession of all company assets and
continue to operate the business.
Distributions will come from net operating profits of the Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb18-50012-16.pdf

J3 Grading & Hauling, L.L.C. filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 18-50012) on Jan. 19, 2018,
and is represented by David Ruff, II, Esq.


JACKSON MASONRY: Bid for Disbursement of Supersedeas Bond Tossed
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned RITZEN GROUP, INC., Appellant, v.
JACKSON MASONRY, LLC, Appellee, Case No. 3:17-cv-00807 (M.D.
Tenn.), District Judge Aleta A. Trauger denies Jackson's motion for
disbursement of supersedeas bond funds and grants Ritzen Group's
motion to stay without prejudice.

In May 2017, appellant Ritzen appealed to this court from an order
entered by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of
Tennessee in the Chapter 11 case filed by Jackson Masonry, LLC
resolving two consolidated adversary proceedings (the "Property
Dispute") between Ritzen and Jackson. More specifically, the
Bankruptcy Court, after conducting a trial on the matter, entered a
final judgment disallowing Ritzen's claim, ruling that Ritzen had
materially breached the terms of a contract between Ritzen and
Jackson for the purchase of a piece of real estate owned by Jackson
for $1.55 million, and awarding damages to Jackson in the amount of
$248,311.83, plus additional costs and expenses.

While briefing on the appeal in this court was proceeding, the
parties filed a Joint Motion to Stay Execution and Establish
Supersedeas Bond. The Joint Motion proposed that Ritzen post a bond
in the amount of $277,070.69, which reflected the amount of damages
awarded by the Bankruptcy Court in the Property Dispute, plus
$29,250 "in projected United States Quarterly Fees for the
approximate 18-month appellate period" and an additional "$20,000
in projected amounts the Debtor will expend in attorney fees and
costs to defend the appeal," but minus "$20,491.14 for amounts due
and owing to Ritzen related to an allowed claim in Jackson
Masonry's bankruptcy case." The parties also agreed that Jackson
maintained the right to request an increase of the Bond Amount
under certain circumstances. The court granted the Joint Motion by
entering the parties' Agreed Order Granting Joint Motion to Stay
Execution and Establish Supersedeas Bond, and Ritzen deposited the
sum of $277,070.69 with the court.

On Jan. 25, 2018, the court issued a Memorandum and Order affirming
the Bankruptcy Court's disposition of the Property Dispute in all
respects. Ritzen filed its Notice of Appeal to the Sixth Circuit
Court of Appeals on Feb. 8, 2018. On Feb. 26, 2018, Jackson filed
its Motion for Disbursement and supporting Memorandum, in which it
argues that, under Rule 8025 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy
Procedure, any order or final judgment in the district court that
affirms a decision of the bankruptcy court on an appeal is
automatically stayed for 14 days after its entry, but that an
appellant who wishes to extend the stay of execution of such a
judgment beyond that fourteen days must file a motion for such a
stay within the fourteen-day window and before filing its notice of
appeal. Otherwise, Jackson contends, the district court loses
jurisdiction to consider a motion to extend a stay of execution.
Because more than 14 days had passed since entry of this court's
Judgment by the time Jackson filed its Motion for Disbursement, and
Ritzen filed its Notice of Appeal without seeking to extend the
stay, according to Jackson, "this Court cannot consider any further
stay." Jackson, therefore, requests an order compelling the
immediate disbursement of $248,311.833 and setting a briefing
schedule and hearing on the question of what additional damages
Jackson may be entitled to recover.

Jackson insists that the Bankruptcy Court's judgment resolving the
Property Dispute, in addition to monetary damages, granted
non-monetary relief insofar as it "quieted Jackson Masonry's title
to the Property." Jackson also claims that the Agreed Bond Order,
besides staying execution of the monetary judgment, incorporated a
stay of the non-monetary aspects of the judgment insofar as it
"barr[ed] Jackson Masonry from (a) selling or marketing the
Property, or (b) substantially consummating its confirmed plan of
reorganization and rendering the appeal equitably moot."

The Court is not persuaded that the judgment at issue involved
non-monetary relief. In resolving the Property Dispute, the
Bankruptcy Court entered judgment in Jackson's favor on all claims
set forth in Ritzen's breach of contract lawsuit and awarded
monetary damages in accordance with an Agreed Order submitted by
the parties. In the Agreed Order Granting Joint Motion Dispensing
with Damages Hearing and Granting Other Relief, the parties
themselves agreed that Ritzen would be liable for additional
attorney's fees associated with the appeal of the ruling on the
Property Dispute, assuming its appeal was unsuccessful, but that
Jackson would need to apply to the Bankruptcy Court for approval of
additional damages. Ritzen also waived the right to contest
Jackson's March 1, 2017 Plan of Reorganization except under very
limited circumstances.

The court also finds that, under the terms of the Agreed Bond
Order, Jackson effectively conceded that, to the extent the
judgment resolving the Property Dispute incorporated non-monetary
aspects, Jackson was adequately protected by the terms of the
Agreed Bond Order and the amount of the bond. The court, therefore,
finds it unnecessary to apply the test for an injunction to
Ritzen's request for a stay. The supersedeas bond submitted by
Ritzen in accordance with the terms of the parties' agreement was
intended to be, and apparently remains, adequate to secure
Jackson's interests.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order dated May 14,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2JvraKC from Leagle.com.

Ritzen Group, Inc., Appellant, represented by James Auman Haltom --
james.haltom@nelsonmullins.com -- Nelson, Mullins, Riley &
Scarborough, LLP, John Thompson Baxter --
john.baxter@nelsonmullins.com -- Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
LLP & Shane G. Ramsey -- shane.ramsey@nelsonmullins.com -- Nelson,
Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, LLP.

Jackson Masonry, LLC, Appellee, represented by Griffin S. Dunham,
Dunham Hildebrand PLLC & Henry E. Hildebrand, IV --
ned@dhnashville.com -- Dunham Hildebrand PLLC.

US Trustee, Interested Party, represented by Beth Roberts Derrick,
Office of the U. S. Trustee.

                   About Jackson Masonry

Jackson Masonry, LLC, was formed on Jan. 26, 1998.  It is owned
entirely by Rogers Jackson.  In 1997, Mr. Jackson left Knight
Masonry and decided to form Jackson Masonry along with his wife.
The business started out of their basement, with 0 projects in the
queue and Mr. Jackson as the only employee.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 16-02065) on March 24, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Rogers Jackson, member.

The Debtor is represented by Griffin S. Dunham, Esq., at Dunham
Hildebrand, PLLC.  The case is assigned to Judge Keith M. Lundin.

The Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of
$1 million to $10 million.


JC FITS: Judge Approves Second Cash Collateral Stipulation
----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Robert Kwan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California, at the behest of JC Fits Inc., has approved
the Debtor's Second Stipulation with Pacific City Bank regarding
the Debtor's interim use of cash collateral.

Pacific City Bank's security interest is subordinated to the
security interest of Prime Business Credit, Inc.  Pacific City Bank
is entitled to adequate protection of its interests as set forth in
the Stipulation.

A full-text copy of the Order is available at

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-21123-89.pdf

                         About JC Fits

JC Fits Inc. is in the business of selling wholesale garments and
its assets consist primarily of garment inventory, which it sells
to its wholesale customers.  The sales revenue from this sale
business is the sole source of the Company's income.

JC Fits, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-21123) on Sept. 12, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Jeong H. Choi, president, the Debtor disclosed total assets of
$588,500 and total liabilities of $1.56 million.  The Hon. Robert
N. Kwan presides over the case.  Joon M. Khang, Esq. of Khang &
Khang, LLP, is the Debtor's counsel.


JM HOLDING GROUP: Hires Silverman Shin as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
JM Holding Group, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ Silverman Shin
& Bryne PLLC, as special counsel to the Debtor.

JM Holding Group requires Silverman Shin to represent the Debtor
with respect to the adversary proceeding commenced by the Debtor
against Gores Clothing Holdings LLC, Ad Pro No. 17-01168, seeking
damages from Gores Clothing for alleged violations of Federal
Security Laws, and fraud and seeking among other things the
rescission of the Debtor's guarantee to Gores Clothing, all arising
from the acquisition by the Debtor of the Capital Stock of J.
Mendel Inc.

Silverman Shin will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners         $425 to $675
     Associates       $300 to $350
     Paralegals           $100

Silverman Shin will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Peter Silverman, a partner at Silverman Shin & Bryne, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Silverman Shin can be reached at:

     Peter Silverman, Esq.
     SILVERMAN SHIN & BRYNE PLLC
     88 Pine Street, 22nd Floor
     New York, NY 10005
     Tel: (212) 779-8600

                     About JM Holding Group

JM Holding Group, LLC, is an investment holding company in Long
Island City, New York.  JM Holding Group sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
17-45647) on Oct. 27, 2017.  In its petition signed by Ioannis
Georgiades, manager, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of
$1 million to $10 million.  Judge Nancy Hershey Lord presides over
the case.  The Debtor engaged Platzer Swergold Levine Goldberg Katz
& Jaslow, LLP, as counsel, and Silverman Shin & Bryne PLLC, as
special counsel.


JOLIVETTE HAULING: Seeks to Hire Compeer Financial as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------------
Jolivette Hauling Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Wisconsin to employ Compeer
Financial as accountant.

Jolivette Hauling requires Compeer Financial to provide tax,
accounting and finance services.

Compeer Financial will be paid based upon its normal and usual
hourly billing rates.  The firm will also be reimbursed for
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Eric Gullicksrud, a partner at Compeer Financial, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Compeer Financial can be reached at:

     Eric Gullicksrud
     COMPEER FINANCIAL
     114 East Wisconsin Street
     Sparta, WI 54656
     Tel: (608) 269-3148
     Fax: (608) 269-4636

                     About Jolivette Hauling

Jolivette Hauling Inc. is a licensed and bonded freight shipping
and trucking company running freight hauling business from Taylor,
Wisconsin.  On Aug. 31, 2017, the Company ceased its business
operations.

On March 27, 2017, Jolivette Hauling filed a voluntary petition
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Wisc. Case No.
17-11005).  In the petition signed by James Jolivette, registered
agent, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.

The Debtor's counsel is Evan M. Swenson, Esq., at Swenson Law Group
LLC.

The Debtor hired Barry Hansen of Hansen & Young, Inc., as
auctioneer for the sale of business equipment.


KANZLER LANDSCAPE: To Pay Unsecureds $8,513 Monthly Over 8 Years
----------------------------------------------------------------
Kanzler Landscape Contractor, Inc., and James J. Kanzler filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois a
joint disclosure statement in conjunction with their plan of
reorganization.

Class 4 consists of General Unsecured Claims. Class 4 Claims will
be paid 100% of their claims over 96 months in equal monthly
installments of $8,513.25.

The Debtor will be entitled to continue to operate its business and
manage its financial affairs without further order of the Court.
After confirmation of the Plan, the Debtor will continue to manage
its financial affairs in the ordinary course. Payments to creditors
pursuant to the Plan will be made from the Debtor's operations and
possibly from a contribution of new value by third parties.

The Debtor believes that the Plan is feasible based upon
projections of income for the life of the Plan. The Debtor is now
in the "high" season. The Debtor has current contracts with a value
of $400,000 and Debtor expects to obtain additional contracts
totaling $1,500,000 this year alone. The current and future
contracts will be sufficient to enable the Debtor to fund the
Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-37355-80.pdf

                    About Kanzler Landscape

Kanzler Landscape Contractor, Inc., is a small business debtor that
primarily operates in the landscape contractors industry.  The
company's gross revenue amounted to $1.48 million in 2016 and $3
million in 2015.  Kanzler Landscape is a private company located in
Round Lake, Illinois.

Kanzler Landscape Contractor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D. Ill. Case No. 17-37355) on Dec. 18, 2017.  In the petition
signed by James Kanzler, its president and owner, the Debtor
disclosed $3.26 million in assets and $2.69 million in
liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge LaShonda A. Hunt.  

Lester A Ottenheimer, III, Esq. at Ottenheimer Law Group, LLC, is
the Debtor's bankruptcy attorney.  DeWald Law Group, is the special
litigation counsel.


KELLER OUTDOOR: Hires Latham Shuker as Counsel
----------------------------------------------
Keller Outdoor Lawn Maintenance, LLC and Keller Outdoor
Environmental Services seek authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando) to hire Scott R.
Shuker, Esq. at Latham, Shuker, Eden & Beaudine, LLP, as counsel.

Legal services Latham Shuker will render are:

     a. advise as to the Debtor's rights and duties in this case;

     b. prepare pleadings related to these case, including a
disclosure statemet and plan of reorganization; and

     d. take any and all other necessary action incident to the
proper preservation and administration of these estates.

Latham Shuker's current hourly rates are:

     Partners              $575 to $350
     Associates            $290 to $220
     Paraprofessionals     $160 to $105
     Scott R. Shuker           $575

Scott R. Shuker, Esq., name partner at Latham, Shuker, Eden &
Beaudine, attests that his firm represents no interest adverse to
the Debtors and is disinterested as required by 11 U.S.C. Sec.
327(a) and as required under Bankruptcy Rule 2014.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Daniel Munoz, Esq.
     Latham, Shuker, Eden & Beaudine, LLP
     111 North Magnolia Avenue, Suite 1400
     Orlando, FL 32801
     Main: (407) 481-5800
     Fax: (407) 481-5801

                     About Keller Outdoor

Keller Outdoor Lawn Maintenance, LLC, and Keller Outdoor
Environmental Services, LLC, are privately held companies in
Sanford, Florida that provides lawn & garden services to buildings
and dwellings.

Keller Outdoor Lawn Maintenance and Keller Outdoor Environmental
Services concurrently filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
18-02958 and 18-02961, respectively) on May 18, 2018.

In the petitions signed by Daniel Munoz, manager, Keller Outdoor
estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and liabilities, and
Keller Environmental estimated less than $1 million in assets and
$1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

LATHAM, SHUKER, EDEN & BEAUDINE LLP is serving as the Debtors'
counsel.


KENTUCKY HOMECARE: S&P Assigns 'B' CCR, Outlook Stable
------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' corporate credit rating to
Kentucky Homecare Intermediate Inc. The outlook is stable. The
company will be merged with and into, Gentiva Health Services Inc.
upon transaction close and will do business under the name "Kindred
at Home" (KAH).

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned a 'B' issue-level rating
to the company's first-lien secured debt, which consists of a $280
million revolver, a $70 million delayed-draw revolver, a $1.36
billion term loan, and an $850 million delayed-draw term loan. We
also assigned a 'CCC+' issue-level rating to the company's
second-lien secured loan in the amount of $475 million.

"The recovery rating on the first-lien debt is '3', indicating our
expectation for meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate: 50%)
recovery in the event of payment default. The recovery rating on
the second-lien debt is '6', indicating our expectation for
negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) recovery in the event of
payment default."

Louisville, Ky.-based Kindred Healthcare Inc. is being taken
private by private-equity sponsors and separated into two
businesses, Kentucky Homecare Intermediate Inc. and Kindred
Healthcare LLC.

S&P said, "The stable outlook on KAH reflects our expectation that
the company will generate mid-single-digit growth stemming mainly
from de novo openings. Though we incorporate some downside pressure
on reimbursement, we do not expect a large reimbursement cut. We
also expect good demand for the company's services, particularly
its largest business, home care. We expect adjusted leverage to
remain in 7x-8x range over the next two years, we expect some
EBITDA expansion and cost synergies to help reduce leverage to
approximately 6x."


KINDRED HEALTHCARE: Moody's Assigns B2 CFR, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned ratings to Kindred Healthcare
LLC ("Kindred LLC"), the borrower that will encompass the hospital
and rehabilitation operations being carved out of Kindred
Healthcare, Inc. (B2 direction uncertain). Moody's assigned a
Corporate Family Rating (CFR) of B2 and a Probability of Default
Rating (PDR) of B2-PD. Moody's assigned a B3 to the proposed first
lien senior secured term loan. The outlook is stable.

The proceeds of the term loan, along with borrowings from a new
asset based lending (ABL) facility (not rated) and approximately
$275 million of new equity, will be used to facilitate the
acquisition of Kindred LLC by private equity firms TPG Capital and
Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe (WCAS).

Moody's will withdraw all ratings at Kindred Healthcare, Inc. when
the acquisition closes and all existing debt is repaid.

Kindred Healthcare LLC

Ratings assigned:

Corporate Family Rating at B2

Probability of Default Rating at B2-PD

$410 million senior secured first lien term loan due 2025, B3
(LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Outlook, assigned stable.

RATINGS RATIONALE

The B2 CFR reflects Kindred LLC's high financial leverage in the
context of on-going reimbursement pressures and low growth outlook
for the overall business. While funded debt is moderate, Kindred
LLC has significant rent expense and long-term liabilities related
to its REIT Master Lease agreement with Ventas Inc. and its
subsidiaries, (Baa1 senior unsecured rating). Including lease
liabilities, Moody's approximates adjusted debt/EBITDA at 4.5x.
Kindred LLC's cash flow will be constrained over time by growing
rent expense, at the same time that it faces continued Medicare
reimbursement cuts in its long-term acute care (LTAC) hospitals.
While the growth outlook for the inpatient rehabilitation (IRF)
business is favorable, cash flow will be constrained by growing
minority interest expense owed to Kindred LLC's joint venture
partners in the IRF business. In addition, there is risk associated
with the carve-out from Kindred Healthcare Inc., as dis-synergies
could be greater than expected or there could be disruption to
operations. The rating is supported by Moody's expectation for good
liquidity, modestly positive free cash flow, and opportunities from
margin expansion due to cost cutting and restructuring
initiatives.

The B3 rating on the term loan reflects the considerable size of
the ABL which has first claim on the company's most liquid assets
as well as flexibility under the credit agreement which provides
limited credit protection.

Moody's anticipates good liquidity supported by a $450 million ABL
(of which $100 million will be drawn). There are no financial
maintenance covenants expected on the term loan. While Moody's
expects weak free cash flow in the first several quarters after the
transaction closes due to one-time expenses, the business should
generate consistently positive free cash flow on a normalized
basis.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that the benefit of cost
reduction plans will help mitigate anticipated reimbursement
pressures.

The ratings could be upgraded if Kindred LLC successfully
transitions to a stand-alone company and executes on its cost
saving and restructuring plans. Further, demonstrated organic
growth, management of reimbursement pressures in the LTAC business
and consistent free cash flow could support a ratings upgrade.
Adjusted debt/EBITDA below 4.0x could also support a ratings
upgrade.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company experiences material
operating disruption or dis-synergies from the separation from
Kindred Healthcare Inc.; if stand-alone costs are ultimately
significantly greater than anticipated or if cost-savings fail to
materialize. The ratings could also be downgraded if there is
material weakening of liquidity or if the company is not expected
to generate consistently positive free cash flow. Material
shareholder distributions such as dividends could also lead to
rating pressure. If debt/EBITDA is expected to be sustained above
5.5x the ratings could be downgraded.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.

Kindred Healthcare LLC is one of the largest providers of LTAC and
acute rehabilitation services in the US. Revenue in 2017
approximated $3.5 billion.


KINDRED HEALTHCARE: S&P Assigns 'B+' CCR, Outlook Stable
--------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B+' corporate credit rating to
home health provider Kindred Healthcare LLC. The outlook is
stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B+' issue-level
rating to the company's proposed $410 million first-lien term loan.
The recovery rating is '3', indicating our expectation for
meaningful (50%-70%; rounded estimate 60%) recovery in the event of
a payment default."

Louisville, Ky.-based Kindred Healthcare Inc. is being taken
private by private equity sponsors TPG Capital and Welsh Carson,
Anderson and Stowe (WCAS), and separated into two businesses.
Kindred Healthcare LLC (Kindred Healthcare) is a provider of
long-term acute-care and inpatient and outpatient rehab services.
The other entity will independently operate the home health,
hospice, and community care business (referred to as "Kindred at
Home").

The stable rating outlook reflects S&P's expectation for Kindred to
maintain stable EBITDA margins, generate good free cash flow, and
operate with adjusted debt leverage between 4x-5x under financial
sponsor ownership.


L S R INC: Hires John Empson AC as Accountant
---------------------------------------------
L.S.R., Inc., d/b/a Brickstreet Artifacts/Brass Tree/Sycamore Inn,
seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia (Charleston) to hire John Empson, AC as
accountant.

Mr. Empson will charge $150 per hour for his services and $60 per
hour for staff time.

Mr. Empson assures the Court that he has no interest adverse to the
Debtor or it estate.

The accountant can be reached through:

     John Empson, CPA
     John Empson Accounting Corporation
     22 Capitol Street,
     Charleston, WV 25301
     Phone: +1 304-343-5646

                        About L.S.R., Inc.

L.S.R., Inc., d/b/a Brickstreet Artifacts/Brass Tree/Sycamore Inn,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. W.Va. Case No. 18-20221) on
May 2, 2018, estimating $1,000,001 to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk.  James
M. Pierson is the Debtor's counsel.


LADDCO LLC: July 6 Plan and Disclosure Statement Hearing
--------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge William J. Fisher conditionally approved LADDCO,
LLC's small business first amended disclosure statement regarding
its modified chapter 11 plan dated May 25, 2018.

A hearing to consider final approval of the disclosure statement
and confirmation of the Plan will be held on July 6, 2018 at 1:30
p.m. in Courtroom 2B, 2nd Floor, 316 N. Robert St, St. Paul MN
55101.

An objection to the disclosure statement or confirmation of the
plan must be filed seven days prior to the hearing.

Five days prior to the hearing is fixed as the last day to timely
file the ballots to accept or reject the plan.

                       About LADDCO LLC

LADDCO LLC, based in Eden Valley, Minnesota, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 17-43456) on November 15, 2017.
In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $500,000 to $1 million in liabilities.  The petition was
signed by Douglas A. Ruhland, chief operating officer.

The Hon. William J Fisher presides over the case.

Sam Calvert, Attorney At Law, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.  The Debtor hired Daniel Schleper as its accountant.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case.


LARGO RESOURCES: S&P Assigns B- Corp. Credit Rating, Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings said it assigned its 'B-' long-term corporate
credit rating to Canada-based vanadium mining company Largo
Resources Ltd. The outlook is stable.

At the same time, S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' issue-level
rating and '2' recovery rating to the company's US$150 million
senior secured notes. The '2' recovery rating reflects S&P's
expectation of substantial (70%-90%; rounded estimate 75%) recovery
in the event of default.

The ratings are in line with the preliminary ratings we assigned on
May 17, 2018. The final documentation does not depart from the
material reviewed previously.

The rating on Largo primarily reflects the company's limited
operating breadth as a single-asset producer of vanadium, with all
output generated from Largo's Maracas Menchen mine in Brazil. S&P
also incorporates the risks associated with Largo's relatively
short operating track record, which reduces visibility on the
sustainability of the company's cost profile. In addition, Largo's
operating performance and liquidity are highly sensitive to the
price of vanadium pentoxide (V2O5), which is an input for steel
production and is historically volatile. Largo is currently
benefiting from the sharply higher V2O5 prices over the past year,
but the company's majority financial sponsor ownership limits
ratings upside.

Largo is one of the few primary vanadium producer globally. Its
Maracas Menchen mine produces standard V2O5 flake, high-purity V2O5
flake, and high-purity V2O5 powder. The mine achieved design
capacity in second-quarter 2016, with consistent grades and
improving recoveries in 2017. The company has issued US$150 million
of senior secured notes to repay its debt outstanding, except for
C$27 million of Brazilian unsecured bank debt.

S&P said, "The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Largo
will generate average adjusted debt-to-EBITDA in low-2x area and
positive free cash flows at least over the next year amid a
favorable V2O5 industry environment that has led to prices well
above historical average levels. However, we also consider the high
sensitivity of the company's cash flows and liquidity to
historically volatile V2O5 prices."

S&P said, "A downgrade could occur if Largo's liquidity position
deteriorated such that it would limit the company's ability to
service interest and maintain capital spending requirements, and
result in what we view as an unsustainable capital structure. In
this scenario, we would expect realized V2O5 prices to fall below
US$5.00/lb, materially lower than the current prices, or experience
operational disruption that constrains production and cash flow
generation.

"Although unlikely over the next 12 months, we could consider an
upgrade if Largo sustains its strong margins while at least
maintaining current cash flow and leverage expectations. We could
also consider an upgrade if we view the company's long-term
financial policy (associated with the financial sponsor ownership)
to be more conservative, thereby reducing the risk of materially
higher leverage."



LAUNCH SPORT PERFORMANCE: Hires Cohen Baldinger as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Launch Sport Performance, P.C., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland to employ Cohen
Baldinger & Greenfield, LLC, as counsel to the Debtor.

Launch Sport Performance requires Cohen Baldinger to:

   (a) give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers
       and duties as debtor in possession in the continued
       operation of its business and management of its property;

   (b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor as debtor in possession
       necessary applications, answers, orders, reports and other
       legal papers; and

   (c) perform all other legal services for the Debtor as debtor
       in possession which may be necessary herein.

Cohen Baldinger will be paid at these hourly rates:

         Steven H. Greenfield        $475
         Merrill Cohen               $495
         Augustus Curtis             $375

Cohen Baldinger will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Steven H. Greenfeld, a partner at Cohen Baldinger, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Cohen Baldinger can be reached at:

     Steven H. Greenfeld, Esq.
     COHEN BALDINGER & GREENFIELD, LLC
     2600 Tower Oaks Boulevard, Suite 103
     Rockville, MD 20852
     Tel: (301) 881-8300

                About Launch Sport Performance

Launch Sport Performance, P.C. -- http://www.launchsp.com/-- is a
privately held company that offers physical therapy, strength and
conditioning, team training, massage therapy and nutrition
services.  Located at 2600 Tower Oaks Boulevard, the company
operates out of an 11,000 square foot facility fully equipped with
the most current, state-of-the-art sport performance and
rehabilitation equipment available.  Launch Sport Performance has
partnered with many local athletic teams to bring athletes the best
off-field training.

Launch Sport Performance, P.C., based in Rockville, MD, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 18-17258) on May 30,
2018.  In the petition signed by Dr. Liz Wheeler, president, the
Debtor estimated up to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The Hon. Thomas J. Catliota presides over
the case.  Steven H. Greenfeld, Esq., at Cohen Baldinger &
Greenfield, LLC, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


LEHMAN BROTHERS INT'L: Ch. 15 Recognition Hearing Set for June 19
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York has
scheduled a hearing to consider the Chapter 15 petition for
recognition of a foreign proceeding and the verified petition under
Chapter 15 for the recognition of a foreign main proceeding for
Lehman Brothers International (Europe) filed by Russell Downs, in
his capacity as the duly authorized foreign representative of the
Debtor, on June 19, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) in Room 623
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, One Bowling Green, New York, New York
10004.

Objections to the petitions, if any, must be filed no later than
4:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on June 12, 2018.

Mr. Downs retained as counsel:

         Amy Edgy, Esq.
         Robert H. Trust, Esq.
         Christopher J. Hunker, Esq.
         LINKLATERS LLP
         1345 Avenue of the Americas
         New York, NY 10105
         Tel: (212) 903-9000
         Fax: (212) 903-9100
         E-mail: amy.edgy@linklaters.com
                 robert.trust@linklaters.com
                 christopher.hunker@linklaters.com

                    About Lehman Brothers UK

Lehman Brothers International (Europe) is the UK subsidiary of
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc, a financial services group that had
gone in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.  The Debtor entered
administration in the UK on Sept. 15, 2008.  The Debtor is now the
subject of proceedings currently pending before the Chancery
Division (Companies Court) of the High Court of Justice of England
and Wales concerning a scheme of arrangement under part 26 of the
Companies Act 2006 of England and Wales.  As of May 14, 2018, 100%
of the outstanding equity interests in the Debtor are owned by LB
Holdings Intermediate 2 Limited (in administration), a company
incorporated in England and Wales.  LBHI2 is an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.

Russell Downs, in his capacity as the duly authorized foreign
representative of filed a Chapter 15 petition for Lehman Brothers
Europe on May 14, 2018 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-11470).  The
Hon. Shelley C. Chapman presides over the Chapter 15 case.  Robert
H. Trust, Esq., Amy Edgy, Esq., Christopher J. Hunker, Esq., at
Linklaters LLP, is serving as counsel in the U.S. case.


LINCOLN PAPER: Claims in Committee Suits v Fisher, et al., Narrowed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the consolidated adversary proceedings captioned OFFICIAL
COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS MELTZER, et
al., Defendants. RODNEY N. FISHER, Appellant, v. LINCOLN PAPER AND
TISSUE, LLC, et al., Appellee, Nos. 1:18-cv-44-NT, 1:17-cv-256-NT
(D. Me.), Chief District Judge Nancy Torresen grants Rodney
Fisher's motion to dismiss, grants in part and denies in part
Douglas L. Meltzer and Dan Herring's motion to dismiss, and grants
Keith Van Scotter and John Wissmann's motion to dismiss. Fisher's
motion for leave to appeal is denied.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Lincoln Paper and
Tissue, LCC asserts claims on behalf of Debtor Lincoln Paper and
Tissue, LCC and the Debtor's bankruptcy estate against the Debtor's
former board members, Rodney N. Fisher, Douglas L. Meltzer, Edward
Dan Herring, Keith Van Scotter, and John Wissmann, and against the
Debtor's sole member, LPT Holding, LLC.

The action involves two operative complaints, the first against
Meltzer, Herring, Fisher, and LPTH (the "MHF Complaint"), and the
second against Van Scotter and Wissmann (the "VSW Complaint"). The
MHF Complaint asserts claims for breaches of the duties of loyalty
and care against Meltzer, Fisher, and Herring (Counts I & II);
claims for avoidance and recovery of transfers against LPTH,
Fisher, and Meltzer (Counts III-X); and a request for declaratory
judgment against Meltzer (Count XI). The VSW Complaint asserts
claims against Van Scotter and Wissmann for breach of the duty of
loyalty (Count I), breach of the duty of care (Count II), and
avoidance and recovery of transfers (Counts III-VI).

Fisher filed a motion to dismiss Count I of the MHF Complaint,
Meltzer and Herring filed a motion to dismiss the MHF Complaint,
and Van Scotter and Wissmann filed a motion to dismiss Count I of
the VSW Complaint. Fisher also filed a motion for leave to appeal
the Bankruptcy Court's April 13, 2017, Order granting the Committee
derivative standing to sue Fisher and the Bankruptcy Court's June
22, 2017, Order denying Fisher's Rule 59(e) motion to alter the
order granting standing.  

All Board Members seek to dismiss Count I of the Complaints on the
grounds that the Committee has failed to state a claim for a breach
of the duty of loyalty. They argue that the Complaints do not
allege sufficient facts to show that they were self-interested and
that the Committee has insufficiently plead that they acted in bad
faith. The Board Members also assert that the Committee is
judicially estopped from alleging bad faith in the Complaints
because doing so would be contrary to statements the Committee made
before the Bankruptcy Court. Meltzer and Herring seek to dismiss
Count II, contending that the MHF Complaint's allegations are
insufficient to state a claim for breach of the duty of care.
Meltzer further argues that Counts III-V should be dismissed
because the MHF Complaint fails to allege that he received a
fraudulent transfer.

The Court finds that the Committee has failed to adequately allege
that the Board Members acted in bad faith. The Complaints'
allegations do not describe a transaction that can "in no way be
understood as in the corporate interest" of the Debtor's sole
member, LPTH. Nor do the Complaints' allegations regarding the
Board Members' decision-making process suggest intentional
misconduct rising to the level of bad faith.

The closest that the Committee comes to a theory of bad faith is
through its suggestion that the Board Members drove the Debtor's
business into insolvency with the intention of benefitting
themselves while leaving the Debtor's creditors high and dry. Even
if the Committee's bad-faith theory is available, the Committee has
failed to plausibly plead within its confines.

In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that the Complaints fail
to state a claim against the Board Members for breach of the duty
of loyalty.

Regarding the MHF Complaint, the Committee alleges that Meltzer and
Herring were involved in the decisions to accept a settlement from
the Debtor's insurer and to make the First Distribution, both of
which were precursors to the Second Distribution. The Committee
also alleges that all of the Board Members convened ahead of the
vote on the Second Distribution, at which time Herring requested
updated financial projections that were not provided. At the
pleading stage, this is sufficient to plausibly infer that Meltzer
or Herring were directly involved in the decision to make the
Second Distribution even if they elected not to participate in the
vote. The Court, therefore, finds that the MHF Complaint alleges
sufficient facts to state a claim for breach of the duty of care
against Meltzer and Herring.

A full-text copy of the Court's May 8, 2018 Order is available at
https://bit.ly/2JkZxYQ from Leagle.com.

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, Plaintiff, represented
by FRED W. BOPP, III -- fbopp@perkinsthompson.com -- PERKINS
THOMPSON, PA & JAY S. GELLER, LAW OFFICE OF JAY S. GELLER.

DOUGLAS L MELTZER & EDWARD DAN HERRING, Defendants, represented by
ADAM J. SHUB -- ashub@preti.com -- PRETI, FLAHERTY, BELIVEAU, &
PACHIOS, LLP, ANTHONY J. MANHART -- amanhart@preti.com -- PRETI,
FLAHERTY, BELIVEAU, & PACHIOS, LLP, EDWARD H. TILLINGHAST, III --
etillinghast@sheppardmullin.com -- SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER &
HAMPTON LLP, pro hac vice & RENA ANDOH -- randoh@sheppardmullin.com
-- SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP.

RODNEY FISHER, Defendant, represented by ERICA M. JOHANSON --
ejohanson@eatonpeabody.com -- EATON PEABODY, MICAH A. SMART --
msmart@eatonpeabody.com -- EATON PEABODY & NEAL F. PRATT --
npratt@eatonpeabody.com -- EATON PEABODY.

LPT HOLDING LLC, Defendant, represented by KELLY W. MCDONALD --
kmcdonald@mpmlaw.com -- MURRAY PLUMB & MURRAY.

KEITH VAN SCOTTER & JOHN WISSMANN, Defendants, represented by
DANIEL L. ROSENTHAL, MARCUS CLEGG & GEORGE J. MARCUS, MARCUS
CLEGG.

LINCOLN PAPER AND TISSUE LLC, Debtor, represented by D. SAM
ANDERSON -- sanderson@bernsteinshur.com -- BERNSTEIN SHUR SAWYER &
NELSON, LINDSAY K.Z. MILNE -- lzahradka@bernsteinshur.com --
BERNSTEIN SHUR SAWYER & NELSON & ROMA N. DESAI --
rdesai@bernsteinshur.com -- BERNSTEIN SHUR SAWYER & NELSON.

                      About Lincoln Paper

Lincoln Paper and Tissue, LLC, is a manufacturer of white tissue
located on approximately 350 acres of land along the Penobscot
River in Lincoln, Maine.  The Company claims to have produced
70,000 tons of tissue and 75,000 tons of specialized, high-bulk
uncoated free-sheet paper.

Lincoln Paper and Tissue filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Maine Case No. 15-10715) on Sept. 28, 2015.  In the
petition signed by Keith Van Scotter, the president and CEO, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.

Judge Peter G. Cary is assigned to the case.

The Debtor has engaged Bernstein Shur Sawyer & Nelson as counsel;
Spinglass Management Group as financial advisor; SSG Capital
Advisors, LLC, as investment banker; and Eisenstein Malanchuk LLP
as insurance claims consultant.

On Aug. 24, 2017, the Court retained Dunham Group, NAI, as broker.


LONG BLOCKCHAIN: Nasdaq Files Form 25 with the SEC
--------------------------------------------------
Amy Horton, hearings advisor at the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, filed
on June 6, 2018, a Form 25 with the Securities and Exchange
Commission notifying the removal from listing or registration of
Long Blockchain Corp.'s common stock on the Exchange.  The
delisting becomes effective 10 days from the Form 25 filing.

On April 10, 2018, the Nasdaq Office of General Counsel notified
Long Blockchain that the determination by the Nasdaq Listing
Qualifications Department to delist the Company's securities had
been affirmed by the Nasdaq Hearings Panel assigned to hear the
Company's appeal.  Trading was suspended effective at the open of
business on April 12, 2018.

                   About Long Blockchain Corp.

Headquartered in Hicksville, New York, Long Blockchain Corp. --
http://www.longblockchain.com-- is focused on developing and
investing in globally scalable blockchain-based financial
technology solutions.  It is dedicated to becoming a significant
participant in the evolution of blockchain technology that creates
long-term value for its shareholders and the global community by
investing in and developing businesses that are "on-chain".
Blockchain technology is fundamentally changing the way people and
businesses transact, and the Company will strive to be at the
forefront of this  ynamic industry, actively pursuing
opportunities.

Long Blockchain incurred a net loss of $15.21 million in 2017 and a
net loss of $10.44 million in 2016.  As of Dec. 31, 2017, Long
Bockchain had $3.23 million in total assets, $3.52 million in total
liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $292,982.

Marcum LLP, the Company's auditor since 2014, issued a "going
concern" opinion in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, citing that the
Company has a significant working capital deficiency, has incurred
significant losses and needs to raise additional funds to meet its
obligations and sustain its operations.  These conditions raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.


MAXAR TECHNOLOGIES: Moody's Cuts CFR to B1, Outlook Stable
----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service downgraded Maxar Technologies Ltd.'s
corporate family rating to B1 from Ba3, its probability of default
rating to B2-PD from B1-PD, and the rating for the company's
US$3.75 billion multi-tranche senior secured credit facilities to
B1 from Ba3. Maxar's SGL-3 speculative grade liquidity rating
(adequate) was affirmed and the ratings outlook remains stable.

"We downgraded Maxar's ratings because Moody's adjusted leverage of
debt-to-EBITDA is about 5x and we do not expect it to decline
significantly over the next two years," said Bill Wolfe, a Moody's
senior vice president. Wolfe indicated that softness in the
company's space equipment and satellite end markets mutes
confidence that revenue and cash flow will expand in 2019-20 so
that the company can reduce leverage towards a previously expected
4x measure. With Maxar's well-intended efforts to change the
paradigm involving increased research and development spending,
free cash flow is suppressed, preventing significant debt repayment
as an alternative to de-levering through cash flow expansion.

The following summarizes Maxar's rating actions:

Issuer: Maxar Technologies Ltd.

Corporate Family Rating, Downgraded to B1 from Ba3

Probability of Default Rating, Downgraded to B2-PD from B1-PD

Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed at SGL-3

Senior Secured Credit Facilities, Downgraded to B1 (LGD3) from Ba3
(LGD3)

Outlook, Remains Stable

RATINGS RATIONALE

Maxar Technologies Ltd.'s (Maxar) B1 CFR is driven by the company's
good product diversity and related engineering expertise in the
aerospace industry, the steady performance and growth prospects of
its space imaging operations, adequate liquidity and expected
2018-19 leverage of debt/EBITDA of about 5x to 5.5x. Moody's
expects that an ongoing technology inflection in the Fixed
Satellite Services sector will mute growth in Maxar's space systems
segment for the next two-to-three years, and the company competes
with larger, more diverse and higher rated companies that may be
better able to financially cope with the technology transition
dynamic.

Maxar has an SGL-3 speculative grade liquidity rating (indicating
adequate liquidity arrangements), based on cash of about $25
million (31Mar18), free cash flow of ~$60 million, and relatively
nominal debt amortization of about $20 million over the next four
quarters. Maxar maintains a $1.25 billion revolving credit facility
which is committed to 2021 and of which about $660 million is
available (31Mar18). With estimated compliance cushions in the 20%
range, access is not expected to be limited. Maxar's ability to
supplement liquidity via non-care asset dispositions is modest
because of engineering interdependencies within its various
operations as well as credit facility security arrangements.

Since they comprise the bulk of the company's liability structure,
Maxar's $3.75 billion credit facilities are rated B1, equivalent to
the company's B1 CFR. Additionally, since Moody's usual practice is
to assume a higher recovery for cases in which the company's third
party debt is comprised entirely of bank debt which features
financial covenants, a lower, B2-PD is a standard result. Since the
revolver and the term loan A's are relatively short-dated,
refinance activity is likely only one-and-a-half years out.
Accordingly, Maxar is subject to refinance risks earlier than would
normally be the case.

Since the former DigitalGlobe, Inc. did not file financial
statements for the quarter-ended September 30, 2017 after being
acquired by Maxar on October 5, 2017, and because Maxar adopted the
US dollar as its functional currency when reporting its year-end
2017 financial results, ongoing financial results are not
comparable to prior period results. Additionally, all last four
quarter results require estimation.

Rating Outlook

The stable outlook is based on expectations of debt/EBITDA
generally remaining below about 5.5x through 2018-19 (4.9x at
31Mar18, estimated pro forma Moody's adjusted).

What Could Change the Rating -- Up

Maxar's rating could be upgraded to Ba3 if Moody's expected:

  - Positive industry fundamentals, solid operating performance and
liquidity; and

  - Growing revenues and free cash flow along with leverage of
debt/EBITDA declining towards 4x (4.9x at 31Mar18, estimated pro
forma Moody's adjusted).

What Could Change the Rating -- Down

Maxar's rating could be downgraded to B2 if Moody's expected:

  - Deteriorating industry fundamentals, weak/deteriorating
operating performance or liquidity; and

  - Leverage was expected to maintained at or above 5.5x on a
sustained basis (4.9x at 31Mar18, estimated pro forma Moody's
adjusted)

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Aerospace and
Defense Industry published in March 2018.

Company Profile

Maxar Technologies Ltd. (Maxar), is headquartered in Vancouver,
British Columbia and has annual revenues of $2.2 billion, from
manufacturing communication satellites, satellite subsystems, and
associated ground infrastructure, and also space-based and airborne
surveillance solutions.


MEDONE HEALTHCARE: Hearing on Plan Outline Set for July 17
----------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Paul Sala will convene a hearing on July 17, 2018
at 2:30 p.m. to consider approval of MedOne Healthcare, LLC's
disclosure statement in support of a chapter 11 plan dated May 31,
2018.

The last day for filing with the court and serving written
objections to the disclosure statement is fixed at five business
days prior to the hearing date set for approval of the disclosure
statement.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, under the
Plan Arizona Healthcare Partners, LLC (AZHP) will pay at least
$310,000; plus contribute time and management expertise; plus make
an interest free loan to MedOne that will not be repaid if MedOne's
Plan is confirmed, all in return for acquiring the new ownership
interest in MedOne.  Creditors other than Arizona Bank & Trust
(ABT) will share in the distribution of the amounts paid by AZHP.

By MedOne's best estimate, ABT's secured claim totals at least
$3,710,224 after credit for proceeds of the prior Court-approved
sale of MedOne assets.  Under the Plan, ABT will waive its
unsecured deficiency after receipt of all amounts the Plan
expressly provide will be paid to ABT.

Other than ABT, the Plan provides that secured creditors'
collateral will be surrendered to them, which will somewhat reduce
their claims, and render the balance of their claims unsecured.
MedOne believes the value of surrendered collateral will be de
minimus, and that the amount of unsecured deficiency claims that
were previously secured, will be substantially the same as MedOne
scheduled for those secured claims, an aggregate total of
$7,705,276.00 (less ABT's waived deficiency claim). General
unsecured claims scheduled by MedOne total $1,237,766.00.

Class 4 (Unsecured Claims). Class 4 consists of any Unsecured
Claims against MedOne existing as of the Confirmation Date other
than Affiliate Unsecured Claims.  Holders of Allowed Class 4
Unsecured Claims will receive the following:

   (i) A pro rata share of all Net Litigation Proceeds;

  (ii) A pro rata share of 25% of the IRS Claim Savings, within ten
days after entry of a Final Order adjudicating any objection to the
IRS Claim and establishing the allowed priority amount of the IRS
Claim;

(iii) A pro rata share of 35% of any AZHP Confirmation Date
Contribution within ten days after any AZHP Confirmation Date
Contribution is tendered to the Plan Agent.

Class 4 Unsecured Claims are impaired, and the holders are entitled
to vote to accept or reject the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-14457-176.pdf

                  About Medone Healthcare

Based in Tempe, Arizona, MedOne Healthcare, LLC --
https://www.medoneaz.com/ -- is a provider of home health care
services including: wound, infusion, ventilators, powered mobility,
enteral, urology, respiratory, sleep and durable medical equipment.
The company is accredited by the nationally recognized HQAA
(Healthcare Quality Association on Accreditation).

MedOne Healthcare filed a voluntary Chapter 11 Petition (Bank. D.
Ariz. Case No. 17-14457) on Dec. 6, 2017.  Stephan Kindt,
president, signed the petition.  The Debtor is represented by
Joseph E. Cotterman, Esq., at Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C.
At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated both assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

The Hon. Paul Sala is the case judge.  

Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, PLC is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MESA OIL: Court Confirms Amended Plan of Reorganization
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Elizabeth E. Brown of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado issued an order confirming Mesa Oil, Inc.'s
amended plan of reorganization dated Oct. 25, 2017 as further
amended on March 6, 2018, April 17, 2018 and May 24, 2018.

The Court finds that the Debtor has complied with all applicable
provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the Plan meets the
requirements of Sections 1122 and 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code, and
the Debtor has complied with Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code.

All payments made or promised by the Debtor under the Plan or by
any other person for services or costs and expenses in or in
connection with the Plan or incident to the case has been fully
disclosed to the Court and is reasonable or if to be fixed after
confirmation of the Plan will be subject to approval of the Court.

Further, confirmation of the Plan is not likely to be followed by
the liquidation, or the need for further financial reorganization,
of the Debtor.

As previously reported by The Troubled Company Reporter, under the
amended plan, Class 9 general unsecured claimants will receive a
pro-rata distribution of monthly payments in the amount necessary
to pay all Class 9 Claims in full over five years from the
Effective Date of the Plan, with interest at a rate of 3% per
annum.  Prior to the Effective Date of the Plan, the Debtor will
also reach an agreement with Lawrence Meers pursuant to which Mr.
Meers will agree to waive distribution on account of his Class 9
Claim in the amount of $232,662 until all other Class 9 Claims are
paid in full.

Assuming the total amount of Class 9 Claims, including the
unsecured deficiency claim of Vertex and excluding the claim of Mr.
Meers, is $1,176,233, unsecured creditors will receive a pro rata
distribution of monthly $21,135.  The Proof of Claim No. 10-1 is
disallowed in its entirety, the total amount of Class 9 Claims will
be reduced to $1,172,656, and Class 9 creditors will receive a pro
rata distribution of monthly payments in the amount of $21,071.

The original version of the plan proposed to pay Class 9 general
unsecured claimants a pro-rata distribution equal to 4% of the Mesa
Gross Revenue generated over the five year period commencing on the
Effective Date of the Plan less the amount necessary to pay any
Unclassified Priority Claimant who agrees to accept deferred
payment of its claim.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-14004-238.pdf

A full-text copy of the Amended Plan is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-14004-237.pdf

                       About Mesa Oil

Headquartered in Commerce City, Colorado, Mesa Oil, Inc., doing
business as Mesa Environmental -- http://www.mesaoil.com/--
collects and recycles used oil, and supplies burner fuel to the
asphalt paving industry.  It offers blended fuel oil, BTU value
fuel, and specification fuel oil for asphalt hot mix plants.  It
serves customers in Montana, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Arizona, New
Mexico, and Texas.  Mesa Oil was founded in 1981.  It is a fee
owner of a land and building located at 20 Lucero Road, Belen, New
Mexico 87002, valued at $1.02 million.  

Mesa Oil previously sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Colo.
Case No. 10-33755) on Sept. 18, 2010.

Mesa Oil again filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Colo. Case No. 17-14004) on May 2, 2017, listing $2.93 million
in total assets and $4.74 million in total liabilities.  Lawrence
Meers, president, signed the petition.

Judge Elizabeth E. Brown presides over the case.

Jeffrey S. Brinen, Esq., at Kutner Brinen, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's counsel.


MLRG INC: Taps Larry Strauss as Accountant
------------------------------------------
MLRG, Inc., has asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia to either approve the employment Larry
Strauss, Esq., CPA & Associates, Inc., as accountant or issue an
order confirming that court approval is not required for the
retention of professionals after confirmation of a Chapter 11
plan.

In its motion, MLRG argued that following confirmation, a
reorganized debtor may employ professionals as it deems necessary
based on the fact that it is no longer subject to the bankruptcy
court's jurisdiction.

If the court, however, determines that an employment application is
necessary, it should approve the employment of Strauss to serve as
its accountant, according to MLRG whose plan of reorganization was
confirmed on Sept. 26, 2017.

The Reorganized Debtor has retained Strauss to assist it in
preparing quarterly reports and a final report; assisting with tax
reporting obligations; and performing all of the accounting
services for the Reorganized Debtor that may be necessary or
desirable.

Strauss' standard hourly rates are:

         Partners         $390
         Managers         $305
         Supervisors      $265
         Seniors          $220
         Staff            $130

Larry Strauss, a principal of Strauss, attests that Strauss has no
other connection with any of the Debtor's creditors, or any other
party-in-interest, their respective attorneys and accountants, the
United States Trustee, or any person employed in the office of the
United States Trustee.

The firm can be reached through:

     Larry Strauss, Esq, CPA
     Larry Strauss ESQ, CPA & Associates, Inc.
     2310 Smith Ave.
     Baltimore, MD 21209
     Phone: 410-484-2142
     Fax: 443-352-3282
     Email: Larry@LarryStraussESQCPA.com

                        About MLRG, Inc.

MLRG, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 16-13634) on Oct. 25, 2016.  In the
petition signed by Michael Landrum, president, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities at $500,001 to $1 million at the time of the
filing.

Todd Lewis, Esq., at The Lewis Law Group, P.C., is the Debtor's
counsel.

On Sept. 26, 2017, the court confirmed the Debtor's Chapter 11 plan
of reorganization.


MODERN VIDEOFILM: Taps Winthrop Couchot as Insolvency Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Modern VideoFilm Inc. seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Central District of California (Santa Ana) to employ
Winthrop Couchot Golubow Hollander, LLP as its general insolvency
counsel effective as of May 16, 2018.

Professional services required of the Counsel are:

     1. advise and assist the Debtor with respect to compliance
with the requirements of the Office of the United States Trustee;

     2. advise the Debtor regarding matters of bankruptcy law,
including the rights and remedies of the Debtor concerning their
assets and to the claims of their creditors;

     3. represent the Debtor in any proceedings or hearings in this
Court and in any proceedings in any other court where the Debtor's
rights under the Bankruptcy Code may be litigated or affected;

     4. conduct examinations of witnesses, claimants, or adverse
parties and to prepare, and to assist the Debtor in the preparation
of, reports, accounts, and pleadings related to the Debtor's case;

     5. advise the Debtor concerning the requirements of the
Bankruptcy Court, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the
Local Bankruptcy Rules;

     6. file any motions, applications or other pleadings
appropriate to effectuate the reorganization of the Debtor;

     7. review claims filed in the Debtor's case, and, if
appropriate, to prepare and file objections to disputed claims;

     8. assist the Debtor in the negotiation, formulation,
confirmation, and implementation of a Chapter 11 plan;

     9. assist the Debtor in the litigation of the Adversary Case
and the litigation of any other claims that the Debtor may hold
against third parties;

    10. take such other action and perform such other services as
the Debtor may require of the Firm in connection with its Chapter
11 case; and

    11. address any other bankruptcy-related issues that may arise
in the Debtor's case.

Garrick A. Hollander, founder and partner at Winthrop Couchot
Golubow Hollander,  attests that the Firm is a disinterested person
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, and
holds no interest adverse to the estate.

The Firm's regular hourly rates are:

     Marc J. Winthrop                $795
     Robert E. Opera                 $795
     Paul J. Couchot, Of Counsel     $750
     Sean A. O'Keefe, Of Counsel     $750
     Richard H. Golubow              $595
     Peter W. Lianides               $595
     Garrick A. Hollander            $595
     Andrew B. Levin                 $435
     Meir Weinberg                   $295
     P.J. Marksbury                  $270
     Stacy Ly                        $270
     Legal Assistance Associates     $150

The firm can be reached through:

         Garrick A Hollander, Esq.
         WINTHROP COUCHOT GOLUBOW HOLLANDER, LLP
         1301 Dove Street, Suite 500
         Newport Beach, CA 92660
         Tel: 949-720-4150
         Fax: 949-720-4111
         E-mail: ghollander@wcghlaw.com

                    About Modern VideoFilm

Modern VideoFilm Inc. is a feature film and television
post-production company based in California.  Modern VideoFilm
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 18-11792) on
May 16, 2018.  In the petition signed by Howard Grobstein, chief
restructuring officer, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities.
Judge Mark S Wallace presides over the case.  Garrick A. Hollander,
Esq., at WINTHROP COUCHOT GOLUBOW HOLLANDER, LLP, serves as the
Debtor's counsel.


MOHAVE AGRARIAN: Bid to Enforce Confirmed Chapter 11 Plan Nixed
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mike K. Nakagawa of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Nevada grants Reorganized Debtor Mohave Agrarian Group,
LLC's motion to reopen its chapter 11 case but denies the Debtor's
motion to enforce its confirmed chapter 11 plan.

On Jan. 19, 2016, the Debtor filed its schedules of assets and
liabilities. On its property Schedule "A/B," Debtor listed an
interest in approximately 8,888 acres of real property located in
Arizona valued at $16,510,000. On its creditor Schedule "D," Debtor
listed Contrail Holdings, LLC as having a claim secured by the
Arizona Property with a balance owing of $7,700,172. On its
Schedule "E/F," Debtor listed the Assessor of Mohave County as
having various priority unsecured claims for unpaid real estate
taxes.

On March 13, 2017, Contrail and Debtor informed the court that
between January 31 and March 12, 2017, a compromise had been
reached. Under the compromise, Contrail would purchase the Arizona
Property from the Debtor, subject to an option allowing the Debtor
to repurchase the Arizona Property in the future ("Option"). The
Debtor and Contrail agreed to file no later than March 16, 2017, a
motion to approve a settlement agreement and mutual releases. They
also agreed that the Debtor would file a further amended plan
incorporating the settlement, as well as a further amended
disclosure statement.

By the instant motion, Debtor seeks to reopen this Chapter 11
proceeding as permitted by the Final Decree. Debtor's purpose in
reopening the case is to obtain a "ruling that the Option remains
in full force and effect under the terms of the Confirmed Plan and
Confirmation Order . . ."

The Court grants the motion to reopen the Chapter 11 case inasmuch
as Contrail does not oppose and good cause otherwise exists.

Regarding the Debtor’ second request, the Court finds that the
Plan Confirmation Order is a final judgment that binds the Debtor,
Contrail, Mohave County, any other creditors, and the equity
security holders to the terms and effect of the Confirmed Plan. The
court cannot relieve any of the parties from the effect of the
judgment.

As a matter of law, the Confirmed Plan cannot be modified. As a
matter of law, the Confirmed Plan is binding. Under these
circumstances, the court concludes that Section 105(a) does not
permit the relief requested by the Debtor.

But even if the court was able to apply equitable considerations
and maxims as a source of relief from the payment deadline, the
court concludes that the relief requested by the Debtor is
inappropriate. In this case, the Third Amended Plan that ultimately
became the Confirmed Plan was proposed by the Debtor, rather than a
creditor's committee or any other interested party. Irrespective of
the statutory import of Section 1141(a), the doctrine of judicial
estoppel would prevent the Debtor from asserting a position
inconsistent with the express language of its Confirmed Plan. But
the Debtor, in this case, does not want to accept the consequences
of the chosen language.

The bankruptcy case is in re: MOHAVE AGRARIAN GROUP, LLC., Chapter
11, Debtor, Case No. 16-10025-MKN (Bankr. D. Nev.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Decision dated May 10,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2xTDt2a from Leagle.com.

MOHAVE AGRARIAN GROUP, LLC, Debtor, represented by BRETT A. AXELROD
-- baxelrod@foxrothschild.com -- FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP, DAWN M. CICA,
MUSHKIN CICA COPPEDGE & JOHN H. GUTKE.

U.S. TRUSTEE - LV - 11, U.S. Trustee, represented by EDWARD M.
MCDONALD, OFFICE OF U.S. TRUSTEE.

                    About Mohave Agrarian

Headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada, Mohave Agrarian Group, LLC, is
a privately-held company founded in January 2014.  The Company
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No.
16-10025) on Jan. 5, 2016, estimating its assets at between $10
million and $50 million and its liabilities at between $1 million
and $10 million.  The petition was signed by James M. Rhodes as
president of Truckee Springs Holdings, Inc., manager of Mohave
Agrarian.  Judge Mike K. Nakagawa has been assigned the case.
Brett A. Axelrod, Esq., at Fox Rothschild LLP serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MONEYONMOBILE INC: Extends Rights Offering Period to June 22
------------------------------------------------------------
MoneyOnMobile, Inc., notifies its right holders that its rights
offering has been extended to expire on June 22, 2018, and to
contact their financial advisor in regards to the timing and
procedures for exercising their subscription rights, as all
broker-dealers have different cut off dates and times for
processing subscriptions in advance of June 22nd.  Right holders
should also be aware that a medallion stamp or notary are not
required to complete the Rights Subscription.

As of June 6, 2018, MoneyOnMobile has received approximately $5.4
million in aggregate irrevocable subscriptions for the purchase of
common stock at $6.00 per share, exceeding the $4 million minimum
objective and less than the $10 million maximum.

"We are excited to have the support of our shareholders during this
rights offering.  We have heard from many of the right holders who
expressed a need for additional time to complete the paperwork
required for participating in this offer.  We note that the
medallion stamp is not required for this process, despite previous
instructions," said Harold Montgomery, CEO and Chairman.

Questions about the rights offering or requests for copies of the
prospectus, when available, may be directed to Mackenzie Partners
at (800)322-2885 or rightsoffer@mackenziepartners.com

As a reminder, this right offering allows its shareholders the
opportunity to maintain or increase their respective ownership in
the company by exercising their subscription rights.  MoneyOnMobile
distributed to its shareholders of record non-transferable
subscription rights to purchase one share of MoneyOnMobile common
stock for each share of common stock held or common stock issuable
upon conversion of preferred stock held at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on May 11, 2018.  Holders who fully exercise their basic
subscription privilege will be entitled to purchase additional
shares of common stock via the over-subscription privilege (should
any of the offering remain unsubscribed at the expiration of the
subscription period).  This rights offering shall not exceed $10
million (approximately 1,666,667 million shares of Common stock)
and be no less than $4 million (approximately 666,667 shares).

Calendar for 2018 rights offering:

Wednesday, May 16 Subscription Period Began
Friday, June 22 Subscription Period Ends by 5:00 PM ET

Details of the rights offering are set out in the registration
statement on Form S-1/A, as amended, file number 333-223935, and
related prospectus or prospectus supplement(s) filed with the SEC,
which are available on the SEC's website at:
http://bit.ly/MOMTsecEDGAR

MoneyOnMobile intends to use the net proceeds from the rights
offering to provide working capital to expand growth in India and
for general corporate purposes.

MoneyOnMobile has engaged Advisory Group Equity Services, Ltd.
doing business as RHK Capital as Dealer-Manager in the offering,
Mackenzie Partners, Inc. as Information Agent and Securities
Transfer Corporation as Subscription Agent.  Questions about the
rights offering or requests for copies of the prospectus, when
available, may be directed to Mackenzie Partners at (800)322-2885
or rightsoffer@mackenziepartners.com

                      About MoneyOnMobile

MoneyOnMobile, Inc., headquartered in Dallas, Texas --
http://www.money-on-mobile.com/-- is a global mobile payments
technology and processing company offering mobile payment services
through its Indian subsidiary.  MoneyOnMobile enables Indian
consumers to use mobile phones to pay for goods and services or
transfer funds from one cell phone to another.  It can be used as
simple SMS text functionality or through the MoneyOnMobile
application or internet site.  MoneyOnMobile has more than 350,000
retail locations throughout India.

MoneyOnMobile reported a net loss of $13.09 million for the year
ended March 31, 2017, following a net loss of $19.72 million for
the year ended March 31, 2016.  The Company's balance sheet at Dec.
31, 2017, showed $27.67 million in total assets, $30.02 million in
total liabilities, $1.22 million in preferred stock Series D, $5.70
million in preferred stock Series F, and a total stockholders'
deficit of $9.27 million.

Liggett & Webb, P.A., in New York, issued a "going concern" opinion
in its report on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2017, noting that the Company has experienced
recurring operating losses and negative cash flows from operating
activities.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


NATIONAL CINEMEDIA: Moody's Rates Extended Sec. Loans 'Ba3'
-----------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned Ba3 ratings to National
CineMedia, LLC's (NCM) extended senior secured credit facilities
comprised of a $175 million revolver due 2023 and $270 million term
loan due 2025. The facilities having springing maturities effective
December 2021 if the 6% senior secured notes due April 2022 are not
refinanced by October 2021. All other ratings remaining unchanged.
The ratings outlook is stable.

Assignments:

Issuer: National CineMedia, LLC

$175 million Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility due 2023,
Assigned Ba3 (LGD3)

$270 million Senior Secured Term Loan due 2025, Assigned Ba3
(LGD3)

LGD adjustments:

$250 million Senior Unsecured Global Notes due 2026, adjusted from
(LGD6) to (LGD5)

The following ratings for National CineMedia, LLC will be withdrawn
upon closing of the transaction and the concurrent repayment of the
underlying debt:

$175 million senior secured revolver due 2019, Ba3 (LGD3)

$270 million senior secured term loan due 2019, Ba3 (LGD3)

RATINGS RATIONALE

NCM's proposed $175 million senior secured revolver due 2023 and
$270 million senior secured term loan due 2025, along with its 6%
senior secured notes due 2022, are rated Ba3, one notch above the
company's Corporate Family Rating (CFR), reflecting their
effectively senior ranking relative to $250 million of 5.75% senior
unsecured notes due 2026, which are rated B3, two notches below the
CFR.

Under the pending proposed amendment to the credit agreement,
financial covenants would tighten and include a maximum net total
leverage ratio of 6.25x. The maximum net senior secured leverage
ratio would be modified to 4.5x (from 6.5x) and only spring when
the revolver is used. Both covenants would have a maximum of $100
million that can be netted from debt. Moody's expects the company
to maintain cushion to comply with these covenants through
mid-2019. The company's SGL-2 liquidity rating reflects Moody's
expectation that NCM will maintain good liquidity through mid-2019,
supported by its $175 million revolver of which $137 million was
available as of March 29, 2018. Since the company distributes
excess cash to its owners, it generally carries nominal balance
sheet cash and the credit facility is thereby integral as a
backstop source of liquidity.

NCM's B1 CFR broadly reflects a small revenue base, but also the
company's solid position within its niche market for on-screen
advertising at movie theaters. Its market position supports strong
EBITDA margins of roughly 50%. The company has modest leverage in
the mid-4x range and good interest coverage, but limited financial
flexibility as a result of the distribution of excess cash flow to
owners. NCM's business is supported by long-term contracts with the
largest cinema owners in the United States, who are also major
shareholders. These contracts provide some stability to future cash
flows. The company provides advertisers with access to more than
20,800 screens at over 1,650 theaters. Of these screens, roughly
16,800 are at founding member theaters.

The stable rating outlook reflects Moody's expectation that
debt/EBITDA will measure in the mid-4x range over the next 12-18
months.

Factors that could lead to an upgrade include growing revenue and
EBITDA in a demand environment that remains supportive of current
pricing levels, and debt/EBITDA sustained under 4x.

Factors that could lead to a downgrade include debt/EBITDA over 5x,
debt-financed acquisitions or dividends, or a deterioration in
liquidity.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Media Industry
published in June 2017.

National CineMedia, LLC (NCM), headquartered in Centennial,
Colorado, is a privately held joint venture operator of a leading
digital in-theater advertising network in North America. National
CineMedia, Inc. is NCM's publicly traded managing owner and held a
48.8% ownership interest in NCM as of March 29, 2018. The remaining
51.2% interest is collectively held by founding member theaters
including AMC Entertainment Inc. (13.6%), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
(18.3%), and Cineworld Group plc and Regal Entertainment Group
(19.3%). Revenue for the twelve months ended March 29, 2018 was
$434 million.


NATIONAL TRUCK: Court Confirms Joint Amended Reorganization Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Katharine M. Samson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi entered an order confirming
Debtors National Truck Funding, LLC and affiliates' chapter 11
plan.

The Court conducted a hearing on the Joint Chapter 11 Amended Plan
of Reorganization and the Plan Supplement and Immaterial
Modification to Joint Chapter 11 Amended Plan of Reorganization
filed by the Debtors, the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors, and CAC Properties Inc., and objections by the U.S.
Trustee, John Fussell, as Trustee of the American Success
Irrevocable Trust, Successful Living Irrevocable Trust and Falcon
Capital LLC, Evabank, and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi
were resolved either before or during the hearing.

Ruling from the bench on the "cram down" interest rate, the Court
held that the Plan will pay secured claims at 6%, calculated as
1.25% over the current prime rate of 4.75%. The remaining
objections made at the hearing each raise one or more of the
following issues: materiality of the modification in the Plan
Supplement, valuation of the parties' collateral, and the Plan's
"dirt for debt" provisions.

PACCAR Financial Corp. filed an objection and asserted two
arguments in opposition to the Plan Supplement. First, PACCAR
argues that the Plan Supplement materially changes the terms of the
Plan by moving twelve of its trucks from the operable ("keep") list
to the inoperable ("return") list and moving four other trucks from
the inoperable list to the operable list, thereby changing the
amounts of PACCAR’s secured and unsecured claims; and by using
"orderly liquidation value" instead of "replacement value" for the
unsecured claims' initial value. Second, Paccar argued that the
Plan Supplement was insufficiently noticed because it was filed the
Friday before a long holiday weekend, with confirmation set for the
following Tuesday. Both arguments fail.

PACCAR has cited no case in which a plan modification was material
as to a creditor that, like PACCAR, had voted to reject the plan.
And the two cases PACCAR cited in support of this argument are, in
fact, contrary authority. The modification is therefore
immaterial.

As to notice, the only parties required to be noticed for a hearing
on the materiality of a modification before confirmation are "the
trustee, any committee appointed under the Code, and any other
entity designated by the court." Here, not only the required
parties but also the objecting parties were present at the hearing.


PACCAR filed a proof of claim for $4,394,834.44. The claim is for
21 cross-collateralized contracts secured by purchase money
security interests in 122 used trucks. PACCAR's claim is treated in
Class 1 (Administrative Expense Claim), Class 3 (Secured Truck
Claims - Operable Trucks), Class 4 (Secured Truck Claims -
Inoperable Trucks) and Class 7 (General Unsecured Creditors).
According to PACCAR, the Class 1 claim is $50,000, the Class 3
claim for 96 trucks is $2,587,050, the Class 4 claim for return of
26 units is $449,000 and the Class 7 unsecured claim is
$1,358,784.44 to be paid pro rata with other unsecured creditors.
The Plan Supplement modified the Class 3 and 4 amounts by changing
the designation of 14 trucks (12 of which are PACCAR's) from
operable to inoperable and 5 trucks (4 of which are PACCAR's) from
inoperable to operable. According to Debtors' appraisal, PACCAR's
collateral has a value of $3,036.050.

The Court addressed PACCAR's objection to treatment of its secured
claim in both Classes 3 and 4 with surrender of only a portion of
its collateral through a partial "dirt-for-debt" Plan.

The Plan Proponents assert that a partial "dirt for debt" plan is
allowable under section 1129. The Plan Proponents further contend
that treatment of the Class 3 claims is not based on a dirt for
debt provision to satisfy the indubitable equivalent test under
section 1129(b)(2)(A)(iii) but is based on the lien retention and
deferred cash payments provision of section 1129(b)(2)(A)(i).

A plan may propose a "partial dirt-for-debt" surrender of a portion
of collateral, but "[i]n such cases, courts must make findings on
the value of the real estate to determine whether a partial
dirt-for-debt plan meets the indubitable equivalence requirement."
The Court has made its findings on the Plan valuation of the
trucks, and the Debtors have met their burden to show the
indubitable equivalence of the property to be returned.

The Plan provides the same treatment of each holder of a Class 3
Secured Truck Claim (Operable Trucks) by providing lien retention
and repayment of replacement value in deferred payments over 48
months with interest. This type of cash payment is allowable under
the statutory requirements of section 1129(b)(2)(A)(i).

Each holder of Class 4 Secured Truck Claims (Inoperable Trucks) is
provided the same treatment of electing either collateral return or
a sale of collateral. Therefore, this type of collateral return
provision is allowable under section 1129(b)(2)(A)(iii).

PACCAR objected to the division of its secured claim into two
different classes. Even if the secured truck claims were included
in one class, applicable authorities allow treatment that includes
both return of collateral and deferred payments. Secured Creditors
in Classes 3 and 4 will receive both actual property as the
indubitable equivalent of their claims and deferred payments on
collateral that is not returned at the replacement valuation with
interest while retaining their liens.

Based on legislative history and applicable case law, the Court
finds that the alternative treatments delineated in section
1129(a)(2)(A) are neither mutually exclusive nor exhaustive. In the
absence of specific statutory authority prohibiting the Plan's
treatment of secured truck claims, the Court finds that the
treatment of these claims does not unfairly discriminate and is
fair and equitable under the Plan as required by sections
1129(b)(1) and (b)(2). The objections to the treatment of secured
truck claims are overruled.

Because the Plan as modified by the Plan Supplement does not
discriminate unfairly and is fair and equitable as defined under 11
U.S.C. section 1129(b) with respect to each impaired rejecting
class, confirmation is required.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 1,
2018 is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/mssb17-51243-1088.pdf

                 About National Truck Funding

Headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi, National Truck Funding, LLC
-- http://nationaltruckfunding.com/-- retails and rents trucks.  
It operates as a subsidiary of American Truck Group, LLC
--http://americantruckgroup.com/-- which is a heavy duty truck
dealer that specializes in aftermarket placement of Freightliner,
Peterbilt, Kenworth and Volvo.  American Truck Group's truck sales
& showrooms are located in Gulfport, MS, Atlanta, GA and Phoenix,
AZ.

National Truck and American Truck sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case Nos. 17-51243 and 17-51244) on June 25,
2017.  

In the petition signed by Louis J. Normand, Jr., their manager,
National Truck estimated its assets and liabilities at $10 million
to $50 million, and American Truck estimated its assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Katharine M. Samson presides over the cases.

The Debtors hired Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard as
bankruptcy counsel; Wessler Law Firm as local counsel; Haworth
Rossman & Gerstman, LLC, as special counsel, Lefoldt & Company PA
as accountant; and Chaffe & Associates as restructuring advisor and
investment banker.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of National Truck.  The Committee is composed of
Yolo Capital, Inc., Hannah Baby, LLC, Kevin C Farber, Gear & Axle
of Mobile, and The Bollier Family Trust. 


NAVILLUS TILE: Fee Examiner Taps Lori Lapin Jones as Attorney
-------------------------------------------------------------
Diana G. Adams, Esq., fee examiner of Navillus Tile, Inc., seeks
approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of New York to hire Lori Lapin Jones PLLC as attorneys to the Fee
Examiner to assist her in carrying out her responsibilities in this
case, to the extentt legal work is required.

Jones Firm has agreed to discount the hourly rate of Lori Lapin
Jones, Esq. to $300.00 (from $575) and legal assistant at $90.00
per hour (from $150).

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, Lori
Lapin Jones, Esq. disclosed that:

     -- he has agreed to discount his hourly rate to $300 from
$575; Jones firm will also discount hourly rate of legal assistant
to $90 from $150;

     -- he does not vary his rate based on the geographic location
of the bankruptcy case;

     -- he has not represented Diana G. Adams in the past 12
months; and

     -- after the Fee Examiner assesses the work to be performed,
he expects to develop a budget with the Fee Examiner who will
monitor the fees of the Jones Firm of a monthly basis.

Lori Lapin Jones, Esq., sole practitioner of Lori Lapin Jones,
attests that the Jones Firm is a disinterested person as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Lori Lapin Jones, Esq.
     Lori Lapin Jones PLLC
     98 Cutter Mill Rd # 201N
     Great Neck, NY 11021
     Phone: +1 516-466-4110

                     About Navillus Tile

Navillus Tile Inc., is one of the largest subcontractors and
general contractors in New York, specializing as a high-end
concrete and masonry subcontractor on large private and public
construction projects in the New York metropolitan area. Navillus
works closely with many of New York's most prominent architects,
builders, owners, government agencies and institutions and is
pre-qualified by numerous commercial and government agencies.
Navillus operates its business from a midtown Manhattan
headquarters which it has leased since 2015.  Donald O'Sullivan,
which founded the business with his brothers, is the sole director,
president and chief executive officer of Navillus.

Navillus Tile filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-13162) on Nov. 8, 2017, estimating $100 million to $500
million in assets and debt.

Judge Sean H. Lane is the case judge.

Cullen and Dykman LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.  Otterbourg
P.C., serves as special litigation and conflicts counsel.  Garden
City Group, LLC, is the claims agent and administrative advisor.

On Nov. 28, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Hahn & Hessen LLP is
the committee's bankruptcy counsel.

By stipulation and order entered May 25, 2018, the Court approved
the appointment of a fee examiner in the Debtors' case.  The U.S.
Trustee appointed Diana G. Adams, Esq., as fee examiner.


NAVILLUS TILE: Unknown Recovery for Unsecured Creditors Under Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
Navillus Tile Inc., d/b/a Navillus Contracting, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York a disclosure
statement with respect to its proposed chapter 11 plan of
reorganization dated May 29, 2018.

In October 2014, Navillus was named as a defendant in a lawsuit in
the U.S District Court for the Southern District of New York
brought by five union pension and welfare benefit funds against
Navillus and Advanced Contracting Solutions LLC, Times Square
Construction, HDK Construction, Donal O'Sullivan, Kevin O'Sullivan
and Helen O'Sullivan. On Sept. 22, 2017, judgment was entered
against Navillus in the District Court Action in the amount of
$76,222,733.32.

Navillus strongly believes that the Judgment was wrongly decided
and, on Sept. 26, 2017, Navillus timely filed a notice of appeal
(the "Navillus Appeal") of the District Court Judgment to the U.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit where it is presently
pursuing appellate remedies to overturn or, at the very least,
substantially reduce, the District Court Judgment.

The Plan provides for the reorganization of Navillus as a going
concern with the support of Liberty for future operations. The Plan
will be funded by one or more of the following sources: Cash on
hand, the Exit Facility, the Reorganized Navillus Notes and/or the
New Capital Contribution. Alternatively, Navillus reserves the
right in its sole discretion to seek to fund Distributions under
the Plan through the proceeds of the liquidation of its assets,
either through a sale of substantially all of its assets pursuant
to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code or the wind-down of its
construction operations and orderly liquidation of assets. The Plan
divides Holders of Claims against and Equity Interests in Navillus
into seven separate Classes based on the nature of their legal
rights, three of which are Impaired, three of which are Unimpaired
and one with respect to which Impaired or Unimpaired status is
contingent on the outcome of the Navillus Appeal and the Auction.

Distributions to certain Classes of Claims and Equity Interests
will be contingent on the outcome of the pending Navillus Appeal
and will be held in a Distribution Reserve until the Navillus
Appeal is decided. The Navillus Appeal of the District Court
Judgment is currently pending before the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals, and Navillus strongly believes that it will prevail in the
Navillus Appeal, thus resulting in the Disallowance of a
substantial portion of the Claims pending against the Estate.

The treatment of Class 5 General Unsecured Trade Claims will be
contingent on the outcome of the Navillus Appeal from the District
Court Judgment, as follows:

   * In the event the Navillus Appeal results in the reversal of
the District Court Judgment, each Holder of a General Unsecured
Trade Claim shall receive payment in full the Allowed amount of its
Claim, either from Cash on hand and/or the Reorganized Navillus
Notes from the Distribution Reserve. Distributions will be made to
Holders of General Unsecured Trade Claims following the later of
the Appeal Determination Date and when all objections to Claims are
either resolved or ruled on by the Bankruptcy Court.

   * In the event the Navillus Appeal results in either: a remand
to the District Court, or the District Court Judgment being
affirmed, each Holder of a General Unsecured Trade Claim shall
receive its Pro Rata share of Reorganized Navillus Notes from the
Distribution Reserve. Distributions will be made to Holders of
General Unsecured Trade Claims following the later of the Appeal
Determination Date and when all objections to Claims are either
resolved or ruled on by the Bankruptcy Court.

Estimated recovery for Class 5 claimants is still to be determined.
This Class is impaired.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-13162-426.pdf

                    About Navillus Tile

Navillus Tile Inc., is one of the largest subcontractors and
general contractors in New York, specializing as a high-end
concrete and masonry subcontractor on large private and public
construction projects in the New York metropolitan area. Navillus
works closely with many of New York's most prominent architects,
builders, owners, government agencies and institutions and is
pre-qualified by numerous commercial and government agencies.
Navillus operates its business from a midtown Manhattan
headquarters which it has leased since 2015.  Donald O'Sullivan,
which founded the business with his brothers, is the sole director,
president and chief executive officer of Navillus.

Navillus Tile filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-13162) on Nov. 8, 2017, estimating $100 million to $500
million in assets and debt.

Judge Sean H. Lane is the case judge.

Cullen and Dykman LLP is the Debtor's legal counsel.  Otterbourg
P.C., serves as special litigation and conflicts counsel.  Garden
City Group, LLC, is the claims agent and administrative advisor.

On Nov. 28, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Hahn & Hessen LLP is
the committee's bankruptcy counsel.


NEIMAN MARCUS: Reports Third Quarter Net Loss of $19.9 Million
--------------------------------------------------------------
Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reporting a net loss
of $19.88 million for the 13 weeks ended April 28, 2018, compared
to a net loss of $24.87 million for the 13 weeks ended April 29,
2017.  For the third quarter, the Company reported total revenues
of $1.17 billion, representing an increase of 4.8% compared to
total revenues of $1.11 billion for the third quarter of fiscal
year 2017.

For the 39 weeks ended April 28, 2018, Neiman Marcus reported net
earnings of $326.43 million on $3.76 billion of revenues compared
to a net loss of $165.45 million on $3.58 billion of revenues for
the 39 weeks ended April 29, 2017.

As of April 28, 2018, Neiman Marcus had $7.64 billion in total
assets, $6.81 billion in total liabilities and $829.38 million in
total member equity.

"Our strategy is working, so we will continue to be laser-focused
on areas that set us apart from competitors -- innovation that
enhances the customer experience, a strong high-performance culture
and new partnerships with both emerging and industry-leading luxury
brands," said Geoffroy van Raemdonck, chief executive officer of
the Company.  "Our customers trust us to be a curator of trends
today and tomorrow, and we are delivering for them."

Net cash provided by the Company's operating activities of $212.8
million in year-to-date fiscal 2018 increased by $280.0 million
from net cash used for operating activities of $67.3 million in
year-to-date fiscal 2017.  This increase in net cash provided by
our operating activities was due primarily to (i) the increase in
cash generated by the Company's operating activities on a higher
level of revenues and (ii) lower working capital requirements
driven by the reduction in its net investment in inventories,
partially offset by (iii) required fundings to its Pension Plan of
$20.0 million in year-to-date fiscal year 2018 compared to $6.6
million in year-to-date fiscal year 2017.

Net cash used for investing activities, representing capital
expenditures, of $109.8 million in year-to-date fiscal 2018
decreased by $54.6 million from $164.4 million in year-to-date
fiscal 2017.  This decrease in capital expenditures in year-to-date
fiscal 2018 reflects lower spending for NMG One, the construction
of new stores and the remodeling of existing stores.

Currently, the Company projects capital expenditures for fiscal
year 2018 to be approximately $180 million to $200 million.

Free cash flow was $103.0 million in year-to-date fiscal 2018
compared to free cash outflows of $231.7 million in year-to-date
fiscal 2017.

"We believe that cash generated from our operations, our existing
cash and cash equivalents and available sources of financing will
be sufficient to fund our cash requirements during the next 12
months, including merchandise purchases, operating expenses,
anticipated capital expenditure requirements, debt service
requirements, income tax payments and obligations related to our
Pension Plan," the Company stated in the SEC filing.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/M794mj

                      About Neiman Marcus

Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC --
http://www.neimanmarcusgroup.com/-- is a luxury, multi-branded,
omni-channel fashion retailer conducting integrated store and
online operations under the Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Last
Call, Horchow, CUSP, and mytheresa brand names.

Neiman Marcus incurred a net loss of $531.8 million for the fiscal
year ended July 29, 2017, following a net loss of $406.1 million
for the fiscal year ended July 30, 2016.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on March 17, 2017, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded Neiman Marcus' Corporate Family Rating to 'Caa2' from
'B3' and its Probability of Default Rating to 'Caa2-PD' from
'B3-PD'.  The company's Speculative Grade Liquidity rating is
affirmed at 'SGL-2'.  The outlook is changed to negative from
stable.  "The downgrade of NMG's Corporate Family Rating reflects
the continued weakness in its financial results as it faces both
the cyclical and secular challenges that face the North America
luxury department stores", says Christina Boni, VP senior analyst.
"Its designation of its MyTheresa.com operations and certain owned
properties to unrestricted subsidiaries reduces assets coverage for
its debt obligations.  The hiring of a financial advisor to
evaluate strategic alternatives also signals the likelihood of its
capital structure being addressed well before its first significant
debt maturity in October 2020.  Despite good liquidity, overall
leverage levels remain well above what can be refinanced and a path
to return to peak EBITDA levels is unlikely in the present
operating environment."


NEW HOPE: CMS Plan Proposes 20%-100% Return for Unsecureds
----------------------------------------------------------
Community Medical Services Holdings, LLC, submits a disclosure
statement in support of its proposed plan of reorganization for
Debtor New Hope Behavioral Health Center, Inc.

New Hope is an Arizona corporation owned by David and Sylvia
Campbell, with its principal operations in Mesa, Arizona. New Hope
operates an outpatient behavioral healthcare clinic that
specializes in substance abuse treatment services.

Class 6 under the plan consists of the Allowed Unsecured Claims of
Creditors of New Hope. The Debtor currently has approximately
$329,000 in cash according to its operating reports filed with the
Court. CMS has no control over such funds until and unless the Plan
is confirmed and goes effective. Thus, the Debtor's cash on hand
could substantially decrease between the two time periods.
Depending on the Debtor's available cash as of the Effective Date
the Allowed Unsecured Creditors will be paid as follows:

   a. In the event that the Debtor's available cash is less than
$100,000 as of the Effective Date then each Allowed Unsecured
Creditors will be paid their pro rata share of $50,000
(approximately 20% return) within 10 business days after the
Effective Date and their pro rata share of $100,000 payable within
36 months of the Effective Date (approximately 60% return);

   b. In the event that the Debtor's available cash is more than
$100,000 but less than $200,000 as of the Effective Date then each
Allowed Unsecured Creditors will be paid their pro rata share of
$100,000 within 10 business days after the Effective Date and their
pro rata share of $100,000 payable within 36 months of the
Effective Date (approximately 60% return);

   c. In the event that the Debtor's available cash is more than
$200,000 but less than $250,000 as of the Effective Date then each
Allowed Unsecured Creditors will be paid their pro rata share of
$140,000 within ten 10 business days after the Effective Date and
their pro rata share of $100,000 payable within 36 months of the
Effective Date (approximately 90% return); and

   d. In the event that the Debtor's available cash is $300,000 or
more as of the Effective Date then each Allowed Unsecured Creditors
will be paid their pro rata share of $200,000 within ten 10
business days after the Effective Date and their pro rata share of
$67,000 payable within 24 months of the Effective Date
(approximately 100% return).

Funds to be used to make Cash payments under the CMS Plan have been
or will be generated from (i) cash on hand; (ii) the Reorganized
Debtor's operations and (iii) the new value contribution by CMS.

A full-text copy of CMS' Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb2-13-14261-324.pdf

                        About New Hope

New Hope Behavioral Health Center, Inc., filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 13-14261) on Aug.
19, 2013, estimating its assets at up to $50,000 and its
liabilities at between $500,001 and $1 million.  James M. McGuire,
Esq., at Davis Miles McGuire Gardner, PLLC, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


NEW MACH GEN: Expects to Emerge from Chapter 11 in 2nd Half 2018
----------------------------------------------------------------
New Mach Gen, LLC, which commenced a prepackaged bankruptcy case on
June 11, 2018, said it anticipates completion of its restructuring
quickly and efficiently, with emergence from bankruptcy expected in
the second half of 2018.

As provided in the Restructuring Support Agreement signed with its
first lien lenders and equity holders, Mach Gen is required to
implement the restructuring in accordance with each of the
following milestones, among others:

   -- No later than 10 calendar days following the RSA Effective
Date, the MACH Gen Entities will file an application for an order
from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") authorizing
the Harquahala Reorganization pursuant to Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, as amended (such approval, the "FERC Order");

   -- On the RSA Effective Date, the MACH Gen Entities will
commence solicitation on the Plan by mailing the Solicitation
Materials (which may be by e-mail) to the parties eligible to vote
on the Plan;

   -- No later than one Business Day after the Solicitation
Commencement Date, parties eligible to vote on the plan must vote
to accept or reject the Plan;

   -- If at least 66-2/3% in amount and more than half in number of
claims that constitute Prepetition First Lien Obligations that have
accepted or rejected the Plan vote to accept the Plan, the MACH Gen
Entities shall commence the Chapter 11 cases by filing bankruptcy
petitions with the Bankruptcy Court by the date falling six
calendar days after the Voting Deadline; provided, however, that if
the Company elects to enter into the Emergency Loan Amendment and
borrow the Emergency Loan, the MACH Gen Entities will instead file
the Chapter 11 cases by the 10th Business Day following the funding
of such Emergency Loan (but only if such date occurs prior to the
Petition Date otherwise contemplated in Section 6(d) of the
Restructuring Support Agreement), unless the Emergency Loan is
repaid in full and in cash prior to that date;

   -- On the Petition Date or within one calendar day thereof, the
MACH Gen Entities will file with the Bankruptcy Court: (i) the
Plan; (ii) the Disclosure Statement; (iii) a motion seeking entry
of the Interim Financing Order and the Final Financing Order; (iv)
the Assumption Motion; and (v) motions seeking (A) approval of the
Disclosure Statement, (b) confirmation of the Plan, and (C) the
scheduling of a hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan;

   -- No later than four Business Days after the Petition Date, (i)
the Bankruptcy Court will have entered the Interim Financing Order
in a form reasonably acceptable to the Required Lenders and (ii)
the MACH Gen Entities shall have filed a motion seeking to approve
an order setting the deadline for all persons or entities, other
than governmental units, to file proofs of claim in the Chapter 11
Cases against the MACH Gen Entities arising prior to the Petition
Date, in a form reasonably acceptable to the Required Lenders;

   -- No later than 30 calendar days after the Petition Date, the
Bankruptcy Court will have entered (1) the Final Financing Order,
in a form reasonably acceptable to the Required Lenders, and (2)
the Assumption Order;

   -- No later than 30 calendar days after the Petition Date, the
Bankruptcy Court will have entered a final order authorizing the
MACH Gen Entities' cash management system on the terms set forth in
the Security Deposit Agreement (as adjusted pursuant to the
Prepetition Amendment) and otherwise acceptable to the Required
Lenders;

   -- No later than five Business Days prior to the Confirmation
Hearing, each of Talen Lender and Talen LC Provider will have
irrevocably confirmed in writing that it will, immediately prior
to, or substantially concurrent with, the occurrence of the
Consummation Date (including the satisfaction or waiver in
accordance with the Plan of all other conditions thereto), as
applicable (i) satisfy the Talen Funding Obligation in its
entirety, and (ii) cause to be issued to the Consenting Lenders
each of the backstop letters of credit set forth on that certain
Schedule A to the New LC Support Agreement -- Backstop LC Schedule
-- in each case issued in the form attached to the New LC Support
Agreement and by a bank listed on Schedule 1 to the New LC Support
Agreement or otherwise acceptable to the Consenting Lenders in
their sole discretion, and otherwise in accordance with the terms
of the New LC Support Agreement and in the amounts set forth on the
Backstop LC Schedule;

   -- No later than 60 calendar days after the Petition Date, the
Bankruptcy Court will have entered an order approving the
Disclosure Statement and confirming the Plan in a form reasonably
acceptable to the Consenting Lenders;

   -- By the later to occur of (i) the date falling 14 calendar
days from the date the Bankruptcy Court enters the Confirmation
Order, (ii) the 15 calendar day immediately following the date on
which the MACH Gen Entities receive all necessary regulatory and
other approvals to consummate the Restructuring -- including, among
other things, the FERC Order and requisite approvals from the
Federal Communications Commission with respect to change in control
over wireless radio licenses -- or (iii) the 20 calendar day
immediately following the General Claims Bar Date, as determined by
the Bankruptcy Court, the MACH Gen Entities will have consummated
the transactions contemplated by the Plan in accordance with all
terms and conditions thereunder, it being understood that the MACH
Gen Entities' entry, as reorganized entities under the Plan, into
the New First Lien Credit Agreement and the satisfaction of the
conditions precedent to the Effective Date, as defined in the New
First Lien Credit Agreement, will be conditions precedent to the
occurrence of the Consummation Date.

                        About New Mach Gen

New Mach Gen, LLC, owns and manages a portfolio of three natural
gas-fired electric generating facilities located in the United
States: (1) a 1,080 MW facility located in Athens, New York, that
achieved commercial operation on May 5, 2004; (2) a 1,092-MW
facility located in Maricopa County, Arizona, that achieved
commercial operation on September 11, 2004; and (3) a 360 MW
facility, located in Charlton, Massachusetts, that achieved
commercial operation on April 12, 2001.  The facilities dispatch
electricity into three power markets, two of which are served by
independent system operators ("ISOs") and similar transmission
interfaces across a geographically diverse area.  Specifically, the
Athens facility dispatches power into the region managed by the New
York ISO, the Harquahala facility into the region served by the
Western Electricity Coordinating Council, and the Millennium
facility into the region managed by ISO New England.

On March 3, 2014, MACH Gen, LLC and four affiliates each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 14-10461).  One month
later, the company exited bankruptcy after winning approval of a
prepackaged plan that gave company's second-lien debt holders most
of the equity of the reorganized company.

On June 11, 2018, New MACH Gen, LLC and 4 affiliated debtors each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the
United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
18-11368).

The new cases are pending before the Honorable Mary F. Walrath.

The Company has engaged Evercore as its financial advisor, Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC as its restructuring advisor, and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as its legal advisor.  Prime Clerk
LLC is the claims and noticing agent.


NEW MACH GEN: Riverstone's Talen to Keep 2 of 3 Plants
------------------------------------------------------
Two and a half years after Talen Energy Corp. acquired the business
for $1.175 billion, the Allentown, Pennsylvania-based independent
power producer sent New MACH Gen, LLC, to Chapter 11 bankruptcy
with a prepackaged reorganization plan that would return 100 cents
on the dollar to unsecured creditors and let Talen retain control
of two of three MACH Gen natural gas-fired electric generating
facilities.

A unit of private equity firm Riverstone Holdings, Talen Energy
produces and sells electricity from its fleet of power plants
totaling approximately 17,400 megawatt primarily in the Northeast,
Mid-Atlantic, and Southwest regions of the United States.

MACH Gen owns and manages a portfolio of three natural gas-fired
electric generating facilities located in the United States:

   (1) a 1,080 MW facility located in Athens, New York that
achieved commercial operation on May 5, 2004 (the "Athens
Facility");

   (2) a 1,092 MW facility located in Maricopa County, Arizona,
that achieved commercial operation on Sept. 11, 2004 (the
"Harquahala Facility"); and

   (3) a 360 MW facility, located in Charlton, Massachusetts, that
achieved commercial operation on April 12, 2001 (the "Millennium
Facility).

In November 2015, Talen Energy acquired MACH Gen, LLC ("Old MACH
Gen") for $1.175 billion.  Old MACH Gen is the direct parent
company of New MACH Gen and is not a debtor in the Chapter 11
cases.  New MACH Gen, in turn, is the direct or indirect parent
company of the following project-owning Debtors: (1) New Athens
Generating Company, LLC ("New Athens"), the current owner of the
Athens Facility; (2) New Harquahala Generating Company, LLC ("New
Harquahala"), the current owner of the Harquahala Facility; and (3)
Millennium Power Partners, L.P., the current owner of the
Millennium Facility.

                         2015 Acquisition

CFO John Chesser explains that at the time of acquisition, the
Project Debtors appeared to be substantial optimization
opportunities with compelling future projections.  At closing, MACH
Gen was party to the First Lien Credit Agreement with the First
Lien Lenders.  Specifically, MACH Gen had $475 million outstanding
under the secured term loan and approximately $103 million drawn
against the $160 million revolving credit facility.

Furthermore, MACH Gen had issued approximately $31 million in
letters of credit.  Despite the highly-leveraged nature of the
business at acquisition, Talen Energy projected MACH Gen to
generate $120 million of EBITDA and $30 million in free cash flow
in 2016, the first full year following closing.

                         Missed Forecasts

According to Mr. Chesser, unfortunately, and concurrent with
industry-specific events that created a challenging operating
environment adversely impacting MACH Gen and its competitors, the
2016 results significantly underperformed as the Company posted a
net loss of approximately $589.8 million.

During 2016, the overall cash balance of MACH Gen grew by $80,000,
which includes an advance from Talen Energy of $14.5 million.
Talen Energy had planned to refinance MACH Gen's outstanding debt
and also intended for the newly acquired Project Debtors to bear
administrative expenses, but was prevented from doing so when the
Project Debtors -- New Athens in particular -- encountered
unforeseen obstacles.  The financial model for New Athens assumed a
low price for gas, specifically because the Constitution Pipeline
proposed for Pennsylvania and New York was anticipated to enter
service in 2016.  The pipeline was ultimately delayed because New
York State did not issue the required water permits.  Litigation
stemming from non-issuance of permits has prevented the pipeline
from being constructed, and it is now not expected to enter service
until at least 2019.  Gas and transmission constraints at New
Athens, which were not reflected in the acquisition model, also
significantly impacted cash flow.

Furthermore, poor market conditions in the Desert Southwest proved
difficult for New Harquahala, which continued to operate at an
approximately $10 million per year cash loss.

Following the closing of Talen Energy's acquisition of Old MACH
Gen, it was also discovered that MACH Gen had unpaid long term
service agreement costs that were not reflected in the original
acquisition forecast.  Additionally, restrictions in the First Lien
Credit Agreement prevented MACH Gen from hedging its expected
margins, which resulted in underperformance when market conditions
were impacted by external factors, such as weather.

When Talen Energy was taken private in 2016, a combination of new
and existing managers were installed at both Talen Energy and New
MACH Gen, as well as the Project Debtors and MACH Gen GP.
Thereafter, management conducted a detailed review of all aspects
of the businesses, identifying significant liquidity constraints
for the businesses in 2017.  This followed the 2016
underperformance in conjunction with very poor winter market
conditions in the first quarter of 2017.  In recognition of the
highly-leveraged nature of MACH Gen's balance sheet and
then-current financial position, MACH Gen's management undertook
discussions with the First Lien Lenders in March 2017, which
resulted in the Fourth Amendment to the First Lien Credit and
Guaranty Agreement, giving MACH Gen the ability to continue drawing
on the revolver.

Despite additional funds from the revolver, the businesses
continued to face challenges.  New Athens showed lower than
expected capacity margins due to lower prices in the New York ISO.
Lower market prices led to energy margin underperformance at both
New Athens and New Millennium in the summer of 2017.  Likewise, a
micro-burst storm in August 2017 significantly damaged the
transmission line of the New Harquahala plant, which resulted in
further market losses.  Simultaneously, MACH Gen faced significant
interest expenses due to the leveraged nature of its balance sheet,
which, in combination with the underperforming plants, further
impacted MACH Gen's available liquidity.

In attempts to address these issues, management took a number of
actions, including efforts to significantly reduce overall future
debt service obligations.  In connection with this, MACH Gen
entered into discussions with the First Lien Lenders in August 2017
regarding a potential restructuring of the First Lien Credit
Facility.

             RSA and Prepetition Solicitation of Plan

MACH Gen and its advisors continued to engage extensively with the
First Lien Lenders through the fall of 2017 and spring of 2018 in
an attempt to consensually restructure the First Lien Credit
Facility.  After months of good faith and arm's-length
negotiations, MACH Gen and the First Lien Lenders agreed in
principle to the Restructuring, pursuant to which:

   (1) MACH Gen would transfer New Harquahala to the First Lien
Lenders in exchange for, among other things, a reduction of $150
million of prepetition indebtedness outstanding under the First
Lien Credit Facility (subject to the terms and conditions of the
Plan, including the Harquahala Reorganization Annex, and the New
First Lien Facilities),

   (2) the remainder of the First Lien Credit Facility would be
refinanced through new first lien credit facilities anticipated to
be in the aggregate principal amount of approximately $513 million,
consisting of a $10 million new revolving first lien credit
facility, a new term B loan facility anticipated to be in an
aggregate principal amount of approximately $448 million, and a new
term C loan facility anticipated to be in an aggregate principal
amount of approximately $55 million, and

   (3) Talen Energy and its affiliates would provide additional new
financing to MACH Gen on a second lien basis, consisting of a new
second lien revolving facility anticipated to be in an aggregate
principal amount of approximately $25 million and a new second lien
letter of credit facility which will be used to collateralize
letters of credit issued under the New First Lien Facilities.

The Restructuring is expected to eliminate approximately $95
million in debt under the First Lien Credit Facility.

MACH Gen, including New Harquahala, will emerge from the Chapter 11
Cases, in each case, a stronger company with a sustainable capital
structure that is better aligned with MACH Gen's present and future
operating prospects.

On June 4, 2018, each of the MACH Gen Entities, Old MACH Gen (as
the Consenting Equity Holder), the First Lien Lenders (as the
Consenting First Lien Lenders), Talen Energy (solely for certain
purposes as set forth in the RSA), and Talen Investment Corporation
entered into the Restructuring Support Agreement, pursuant to which
the MACH Gen Entities, the Consenting First Lien Lenders, and the
Consenting Equity Holder agreed, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth therein, to, inter alia, support, vote to
accept (to the extent applicable), and to implement the
Restructuring through the Chapter 11 Cases and the Plan.

Pursuant to the Plan, it is contemplated that all claims and
interests with respect to the MACH Gen Entities other than claims
under the First Lien Credit Facility and interests in New
Harquahala will be either paid in full on the effective date of the
Plan or otherwise rendered unimpaired.

                        About New Mach Gen

New Mach Gen, LLC, owns and manages a portfolio of three natural
gas-fired electric generating facilities located in the United
States: (1) a 1,080 MW facility located in Athens, New York, that
achieved commercial operation on May 5, 2004; (2) a 1,092 MW
facility located in Maricopa County, Arizona, that achieved
commercial operation on September 11, 2004; and (3) a 360 MW
facility, located in Charlton, Massachusetts, that achieved
commercial operation on April 12, 2001.  The facilities dispatch
electricity into three power markets, two of which are served by
independent system operators ("ISOs") and similar transmission
interfaces across a geographically diverse area.  Specifically, the
Athens facility dispatches power into the region managed by the New
York ISO, the Harquahala facility into the region served by the
Western Electricity Coordinating Council, and the Millennium
facility into the region managed by ISO New England.

On March 3, 2014, MACH Gen, LLC and four affiliates each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 14-10461).  One month
later, the company exited bankruptcy after winning approval of a
prepackaged plan that gave the company's second-lien debt holders
most of the equity of the reorganized company.

On June 11, 2018, New MACH Gen, LLC and four affiliates each filed
a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11368).
The new cases are pending before the Honorable Mary F. Walrath.

The Company has engaged Evercore as its financial advisor, Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC as its restructuring advisor, and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as its legal advisor.  Prime Clerk
LLC is the claims and noticing agent.


NEW MACH GEN: Unsecured Creditors to Get 100% in Prepack Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
New MACH Gen, LLC and its subsidiaries MACH Gen GP, LLC, Millennium
Power Partners, L.P., New Athens Generating Company, LLC, and New
Harquahala Generating Company, LLC, have sought bankruptcy
protection with a prepackaged plan by:

    * Beal Bank USA and Beal Bank, SSB, as first lien lenders; and

    * Telen Corp.'s Old MACH Gen, as equity holder.

The Plan provides for a restructuring of MACH Gen that will result
in:

   (1) the transfer of the equity of New Harquahala Generating
Company, LLC, the owner of the Harquahala Facility—a 1,092 MW
natural gas fired electric generating facility located in Maricopa
County, Arizona—to the First Lien Lenders in exchange for, among
other things, the First Lien Loan Reduction (subject to the terms
and conditions of the Plan, including the Harquahala Reorganization
Annex, and the New First Term Loan) (the "Harquahala
Reorganization"),

   (2) the refinancing of the remainder of MACH Gen's First Lien
Credit Facility through a new first lien credit facility provided
to Reorganized MACH Gen (as such term is defined in the Plan) by
the First Lien Lenders anticipated to be in an aggregate principal
amount of approximately $512 million, consisting of a $10 million
new revolving first lien credit facility, a new term B loan
facility anticipated to be in an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $448 million, and a new term C loan facility
anticipated to be in an aggregate principal amount of approximately
$54 million, and

   (3) the extension of new financing to Reorganized MACH Gen
provided by Talen Energy Supply, LLC, as the "Talen L/C Provider,"
and by Talen Investment Corporation, as the "Talen Lender," on a
second lien basis, consisting of a new second lien term loan credit
facility anticipated to be in an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $25 million and a new second lien letter of credit
facility which will be used to collateralize letters of credit
issued under the New First Lien Facilities.

The Restructuring is expected to eliminate approximately $95
million in debt under MACH Gen's First Lien Facilities.  MACH Gen,
including New Harquahala, will emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases in
each case a stronger company with a sustainable capital structure
that is better aligned with MACH Gen's present and future operating
prospects.

MACH Gen is commencing solicitation on the Plan following extensive
discussions with the Support Parties, who constitute certain of the
Debtors' key stakeholders.  The discussions have resulted in the
significant majorities of its stakeholders agreeing to support the
Restructuring and to vote to accept the Plan pursuant to a
Restructuring Support Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2018, among
MACH Gen and:

   * holders of 100% of the First Lien Revolver Claims and First
Lien Term Loan Claims (the "Consenting First Lien Holders"); and

   * holders of 100% of the Interests in New MACH Gen, LLC (the
"Consenting Equity Holders").

As a result of the Restructuring provided in the Plan:

  -- Each holder of an Allowed First Lien Revolver Claim, such
Claims collectively in the aggregate principal amount of
approximately $132,953,263.52, plus any interest, fees, expenses,
and other amounts due and owing in respect of the First Lien
Revolver Claims pursuant to the First Lien Credit Agreement as of
the Effective Date, will be exchanged for either:

      (i) if the First Lien Step-In Scenario does not occur, its
Pro Rata share relative to all Allowed First Lien Revolver Claims
and all Allowed First Lien Term Loan Claims (or such other
allocation as may be determined by the First Lien Lenders in their
sole discretion) of (A) Cash on account of the Amendment Fee and
Deferred Charges Amount, (B) the New First Lien Term Loans, (C) the
New First Lien Revolver, and (D) in exchange for the First Lien
Loan Reduction (subject to the terms and conditions of the
Harquahala Reorganization Annex and the New First Lien Term Loans),
100% of the Interests in Reorganized New Harquahala; or

     (ii) in the event of a First Lien Step-In Scenario, its Pro
Rata share relative to all Allowed DIP Claims, Allowed First Lien
Revolver Claims, and Allowed First Lien Term Loan Claims -- or such
other allocation as may be determined by the First Lien Lenders and
DIP Lenders in their sole discretion -- of 100% of the Interests in
Reorganized MACH Gen;

  -- Each holder of an Allowed First Lien Term Loan Claim, such
Claims collectively in the aggregate principal amount of
approximately $465,114,835, plus any interest, fees, expenses, and
other amounts due and owing in respect of the First Lien Term Loan
Claims pursuant to the First Lien Credit Agreement as of the
Effective Date, will be exchanged for either:

       (i) if the First Lien Step-In Scenario does not occur, its
Pro Rata share relative to all Allowed First Lien Revolver Claims
and all Allowed First Lien Term Loan Claims of (A) Cash on account
of the Amendment Fee and Deferred Charges Amount, (B) the New First
Lien Term Loans, (C) the New First Lien Revolver, and (D) in
exchange for the First Lien Loan Reduction (subject to the terms
and conditions of the Harquahala Reorganization Annex and the New
First Lien Term Loans), 100% of the Interests in Reorganized New
Harquahala; or

      (ii) in the event of a First Lien Step-In Scenario, its Pro
Rata share relative to all Allowed DIP Claims, Allowed First Lien
Revolver Claims, and Allowed First Lien Term Loan Claims (or such
other allocation as may be determined by the First Lien Lenders and
DIP Lenders in their sole discretion) of 100% of the Interests in
Reorganized MACH Gen;

  -- the Allowed Interests in each of the MACH Gen Entities will
(i) if the First Lien Step-In Scenario does not occur, be
reinstated, other than the Allowed Interests in New Harquahala,
which will be cancelled, or (ii) if the First Lien Step-In Scenario
does occur, be reinstated, other than the Allowed Interests in New
MACH Gen, LLC, which will be cancelled; and

  -- all other Allowed Claims, including all Allowed General
Unsecured Claims, will be paid in full or otherwise rendered
Unimpaired (other than Intercompany Claims, which may be reinstated
or cancelled as set forth in the Plan).

To implement the transactions and distributions, in connection with
the consummation of the Plan, if the First Lien Step-In Scenario
does not occur, (1) MACH Gen will consummate the Harquahala
Reorganization (subject to the terms and conditions of the
Harquahala Reorganization Annex), (2) Reorganized MACH Gen will
enter into the New First Lien Facilities, and (3) Reorganized MACH
Gen will enter into the New Second Lien Facilities.

MACH Gen, with the support of the Support Parties, believes that
consummation of the proposed Restructuring under the Plan will
provide MACH Gen with the capital structure and liquidity to
continue operating as a going concern as a result of, among other
things: (1) the sale of New Harquahala to the First Lien Lenders in
exchange for the First Lien Loan Reduction (subject to the terms
and conditions of the Plan, including the Harquahala Reorganization
Annex, and the New First Lien Term Loans); (2) the reduction of
approximately $95 million of long-term debt under the First Lien
Facilities; and (3) the elimination of approximately $20 million
per year of cash interest that would otherwise continue to accrue
under the First Lien Facilities. MACH Gen believes the realization
of these transactions on the terms outlined in the Plan will enable
MACH Gen to emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases appropriately
capitalized and competitively positioned within the wholesale power
markets for the Athens Facility and Millennium Facility.

Additionally, New Harquahala will be unburdened of all funded debt
obligations and competitively positioned within the wholesale power
market for the Harquahala Facility.

In connection with developing the Plan, MACH Gen conducted a
careful review of its current business operations and compared its
projected value as an ongoing business enterprise with its
potential value in a liquidation scenario, as well as the estimated
recoveries to holders of Allowed Claims and Interests thereunder.
MACH Gen concluded that the potential recoveries to holders of
Allowed Claims and Interests would be maximized by continuing to
operate as a going concern, following the transfer of New
Harquahala.  MACH Gen believes that its businesses and assets have
significant value that would not be realized in a liquidation,
either in whole or in substantial part.  Consistent with the
liquidation analysis and other analyses prepared by MACH Gen and
its advisors, MACH Gen believes the value of its assets would be
considerably greater if MACH Gen operates as a going concern and
continues to generate revenues by selling energy, capacity, and
ancillary services, while awaiting better market conditions for the
sale of its assets, as opposed to immediately liquidating.

Moreover, MACH Gen believes that any alternative to the
Restructuring contemplated by the Plan, such as an out-of-court
restructuring, a liquidation, or attempts by another
party-in-interest to file an alternative plan of reorganization,
could result in significant delay, litigation, execution risk,
and/or additional costs and, ultimately, could lower the recoveries
to holders of Allowed Claims and Interests.

The estimated recoveries under the Plan are:

  Class                            Status         Recovery
  ------                           ------         --------
1 Priority Non-Tax Claims          Unimpaired        N/A

2 Other Secured Claims             Unimpaired        N/A

3A First Lien Revolver Claims      Impaired         100%
   ($132,953,263.52)

3B First Lien Term Loan Claims     Impaired         100%
   ($465,114,835.06)

4 General Unsecured Claims         Unimpaired       100%
   ($51,969,4085)

5 Intercompany Claims              Unimpaired
                                   or Impaired       N/A

6(a) Interests in New MACH Gen     Unimpaired
                                   or Impaired       N/A

6(b) Interests in MACH Gen GP      Unimpaired        N/A

6(c) Interests in Mill. Power      Unimpaired        N/A

6(d) Interests in New Athens       Unimpaired        N/A

6(e) Interests in New Harquahala   Unimpaired
                                   or Impaired       N/A

The Estimated Allowed Amount of General Unsecured Claims includes
approximately $21,543,000 on account of unsecured claims that the
Debtors anticipate seeking approval to pay pursuant to the Debtors'
first day motions.  The Estimated Allowed Amount of General
Unsecured Claims also includes approximately $30,426,408 on account
of what MACH Gen (but not the First Lien Lenders) has determined to
be an unsecured claim by Talen LC Provider against the MACH Gen
Entities (the "Tax Allocation Claims") that arose in connection
with that certain Amended and Restated Tax Allocation Agreement, by
and among Talen Energy Corporation and the Talen Tax Affiliates,
effective as of Dec. 15, 2015 and terminated effective Jan. 1,
2017.  MACH Gen anticipates that the Tax Allocation Claims will be
reinstated against Reorganized MACH Gen.

Talen Energy Supply, LLC's attorneys:

         Lisa Laukitis, Esq.
         Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
         4 Times Square
         New York, NY 10036
         E-mail: lisa.laukitis@skadden.com
         Telephone: (212) 735-3290
         Facsimile: (212) 735-2000

CLMG Corp., as administrative agent and collateral agent's
attorneys:

         Ellis M. Butler, Esq.
         Hunton & Williams LLP
         2200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
         Washington, DC 20037
         E-mail: ebutler@hunton.com
         Telephone: (202) 955-1500
         Facsimile: (202) 778-2201

                  - and -

         Thomas E Lauria, Esq.
         White & Case LLP
         Southeast Financial Center, Suite 4900
         200 South Biscayne Boulevard
         Miami, FL 33131
         E-mail: tlauria@whitecase.com
         Telephone: (305) 371-2700
         Facsimile: (305) 358-5744

                  - and -

         Scott Greissman, Esq.
         White & Case LLP
         1155 Avenue of the Americas
         New York, NY 10036
         E-mail: sgreissman@whitecase.com
         Telephone: (212) 819-8200
         Facsimile: (212) 354-8113

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/NMG_14_DS.pdf

                        About New Mach Gen

New Mach Gen, LLC, owns and manages a portfolio of three natural
gas-fired electric generating facilities located in the United
States: (1) a 1,080 MW facility located in Athens, New York, that
achieved commercial operation on May 5, 2004; (2) a 1,092-MW
facility located in Maricopa County, Arizona, that achieved
commercial operation on September 11, 2004; and (3) a 360-MW
facility, located in Charlton, Massachusetts, that achieved
commercial operation on April 12, 2001.  The facilities dispatch
electricity into three power markets, two of which are served by
independent system operators ("ISOs") and similar transmission
interfaces across a geographically diverse area.  Specifically, the
Athens facility dispatches power into the region managed by the New
York ISO, the Harquahala facility into the region served by the
Western Electricity Coordinating Council, and the Millennium
facility into the region managed by ISO New England.

On March 3, 2014, MACH Gen, LLC and four affiliates each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 14-10461).  One month
later, the company exited bankruptcy after winning approval of a
prepackaged plan that gave company's second-lien debt holders most
of the equity of the reorganized company.

On June 11, 2018, New MACH Gen, LLC and four affiliates each filed
a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-11368).
The new cases are pending before the Honorable Mary F. Walrath.

The Company has engaged Evercore as its financial advisor, Alvarez
& Marsal North America, LLC as its restructuring advisor, and Young
Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP as its legal advisor.  Prime Clerk
LLC is the claims and noticing agent.


NICHOLS BROTHERS: Hires McDonald & Metcalf LLP as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Nichols Brothers, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority
from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Oklahoma (Tulsa) to hire McDonald & Metcalf, L.L.P., as
counsel.

Services to be rendered by MM are:

     a. take all necessary or appropriate actions to protect and
preserve Debtors' estate, including the prosecution of actions on
Debtors' behalf, the defense of any action commenced against
Debtors, the negotiation of disputes in
which Debtors are involved, and the preparation of objections to
claims filed against the estate;

     b. prepare on behalf of Debtors all necessary and appropriate
motions, applications, answers, orders, reports, and other papers
in connection with the administration of the estate;

     c. take all necessary or appropriate actions in connection
with a Chapter 11 plan and related disclosure statement and all
related documents, as well as such further actions as may be
required in connection with the
administration of the estate, including an orderly liquidation of
assets; and

     d. perform all other necessary legal services in connection
with this Chapter 11 case.

MM's standard hourly rates are:

             Gary M. McDonald    $365
             Chad J. Kutmas      $335
             Mary E. Kindelt     $295

Hourly rates of other partners will not exceed that of Mr.
McDonald, and no rate of any associate attorney will exceed the
hourly rate of $200.

Gary M. McDonald, Esq., a partner at McDonald & Metcalf, attests
that MM is a "disinterested person" as that terms is defined in
Sec. 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Gary M. McDonald, Esq.
     Chad J. Kutmas, Esq.
     Mary E. Kindelt, Esq.
     MCDONALD & METCALF, LLP
     First Place Tower
     15 E. Fifth Street, Suite 1400
     Tulsa, OK 74103
     Tel: (918) 430-3700
     Fax: (918) 430-3770
     Emails: gmcdonald@mmmsk.com
             ckutmas@mmmsk.com
             mkindelt@mmmsk.com

                    About Nichols Brothers

Nichols Brothers, Inc., and its debtor subsidiaries are primarily
focused on oil and gas production operating approximately 400
producing wells, which are generally considered "stripper wells" in
the industry.  The debtors constitute a diverse business group
owned and operated by Richard and Orville Nichols that have been in
existence for over 40 years.  They collectively employ 25
individuals with an additional 20 contractors that provide services
out in the field.  Nichols Brothers is headquartered in Tulsa,
Oklahoma.

Nichols Brothers and its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions
(Bankr. N.D. Okla. Lead Case No. 18-11123) on June 1, 2018.  In the
petition signed by Richard Nichols, president, Nichols Brothers
disclosed $10,388 in assets and $32.87 million in liabilities.  The
case is assigned to Judge Terrence L. Michael.  Gary M. McDonald,
Esq., Chad J. Kutmas, Esq. and Mary E. Kindelt, Esq., at McDONALD &
METCALF, LLP, serve as the Debtors' counsel.


NINE WEST HOLDINGS: Claims Bar Date Set for June 29
---------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York set
June 29, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. (Prevailing Eastern Time) as last date
and time for each person or entity to file proofs of claim against
Nine West Holdings Inc. and its debtor-affiliates.

Each proof of claim must be submitted by either (i) electronically
using the interface available on the notice and claims agent's
website at https://cases.primeclerk.com/ninewest, or (ii)
first-class U.S. mail, overnight mail, or other hand-delivery
system at:

   Nine West Claims Processing Center
   c/o Prime Clerk LLC
   850 Third Avenue, Suite 412
   Brooklyn, NY 11232

                     About Nine West Holdings

Nine West Holdings is a footwear, accessories, women's apparel, and
jeanswear company with a portfolio of brands that includes Nine
West, Anne Klein, and Gloria Vanderbilt.  The company is a
wholesale partner to major U.S. retailers and has international
licensing arrangements covering more than 1,200 points of sale
around the world.

On April 6, 2018, Nine West Holdings, Inc., and 10 affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
18-10947).  Nine West estimated $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and $1 billion to $10 billion in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman is the case judge.  

Nine West Holdings' legal advisors are Kirkland & Ellis LLP.  The
Company's financial advisor is Lazard Freres & Co., and its
restructuring advisor is Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC.  Prime
Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

The Independent Directors tapped Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP as
counsel and Berkeley Research Group as financial advisor.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee tapped
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP as its legal counsel; Houlihan
Lokey Capital, Inc., as investment banker; and Protiviti Inc. as
financial advisor and forensic accountant.


NINE WEST: Authentic Brands' $350 Million Bid Wins Auction
----------------------------------------------------------
Authentic Brands Group LLC won the auction for the intellectual
property of U.S. shoe and accessories company Nine West Holdings
Inc. with a revised bid of about $350 million, Reuters reports,
citing people familiar with the matter.

Authentic Brands, a brand development and marketing company, was
bidding against shoe retailer DSW Inc for the well-known Nine West
brand, the sources said, according to the report.

Authentic Brands, through ABG-Nine West LLC, was the stalking horse
bidder, with an initial bid of $200 million.

The Debtors won approval to conduct a sale process for
substantially all of the assets of the Debtors' "Nine West",
"Bandolino", and associated brands.  Initial bids were due June 4,
2018, and the auction was conducted June 8.

A hearing to consider the proposed sale will be held before the
Hon. Shelley C. Chapman of the U.S. Bankruptcy on June 18, 2018, at
11:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) at One Bowling Green, New
York, New York 10004-1408.

                    About Nine West Holdings

Nine West Holdings is a footwear, accessories, women's apparel, and
jeanswear company with a portfolio of brands that includes Nine
West, Anne Klein, and Gloria Vanderbilt.  The company is a
wholesale partner to major U.S. retailers and has international
licensing arrangements covering more than 1,200 points of sale
around the world.

On April 6, 2018, Nine West Holdings, Inc., and 10 affiliates
sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
18-10947).  Nine West estimated $500 million to $1 billion in
assets and $1 billion to $10 billion in liabilities as of the
bankruptcy filing.

The Hon. Shelley C. Chapman is the case judge.  Nine West Holdings'
legal advisors are Kirkland & Ellis LLP.  The Company's financial
advisor is Lazard Freres & Co., and its restructuring advisor is
Alvarez & Marsal North America LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims
and noticing agent.

The Independent Directors tapped Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP as
counsel and Berkeley Research Group as financial advisor.

William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed
seven creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors.


NOVAN INC: Stockholders Elected 3 Directors
-------------------------------------------
Novan, Inc. held its 2018 annual meeting of stockholders on June 4
at which the stockholders elected Robert A. Ingram, Kelly G. Martin
and Machelle Sanders as Class II directors who were nominated to
serve until the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until such
director's successor is elected and qualified, or until his or her
earlier death, resignation or removal.  The proposal to ratify the
appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Company's independent registered
public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2018 was
approved.

                        About Novan Inc.

Based in Morrisville, North Carolina, Novan Inc. --
http://www.novan.com/-- is a clinical-stage biotechnology company
focused on leveraging nitric oxide's natural antiviral and
immunomodulatory mechanisms of action to treat dermatological and
oncovirus-mediated diseases.  Nitric oxide plays a vital role in
the natural immune system response against microbial pathogens and
is a critical regulator of inflammation.  The Company's ability to
harness nitric oxide and its multiple mechanisms of action has
enabled it to create a platform with the potential to generate
differentiated product candidates.  The two key components of the
Company's nitric oxide platform are its proprietary Nitricil
technology, which drives the creation of new chemical entities, or
NCEs, and its topical formulation science, both of which the
Company uses to tune the Company's product candidates for specific
indications.

Novan incurred reporting a net loss and comprehensive loss of
$37.12 million in 2017 following a net loss and comprehensive loss
of $59.69 million in 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Novan had $46.30
million in total assets, $34.92 million in total liabilities and
$11.37 million in total stockholders' equity.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph
stating that the Company has suffered recurring losses from
operations, negative cash flow from operating activities, and has
an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


NYS ENERGY AUDITS: Hires Wisdom Professional as Accountant
----------------------------------------------------------
NYS Energy Audits, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ Wisdom
Professional Services, Inc., as accountant to the Debtor.

NYS Energy Audits requires Wisdom Professional to:

   a. gather and verify all pertinent information required to
      compile and prepare monthly operating reports;

   b. prepare monthly operating reports for the Debtor in the
      bankruptcy case.

Wisdom Professional will be paid at the hourly rate of $300.

The Debtor paid Wisdom Professional a retainer in the amount of
$2,000 on April 30, 2018.

Wisdom Professional will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Michael Shtarkman, a partner at the firm, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Wisdom Professional can be reached at:

     Michael Shtarkman
     WISDOM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC
     2546 East 17th Street
     Brooklyn, NY 11235
     Tel: (718) 554-6672

                     About NYS Energy Audits

NYS Energy Audits, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-42865) on May 17, 2018, estimating
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is
represented by Alla Kachan, Esq., of the Law Offices of Alla
Kachan, P.C.



OAKRIDGE HOLDINGS: Unsecureds to Receive $50K in Two Payments
-------------------------------------------------------------
Oakridge Holdings, Inc. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Minnesota a first amended disclosure statement to
accompany its liquidating plan of reorganization dated June 5,
2018.

As of the Petition Date, Debtor's principal asset was the 100%
ownership of Stinar, HG, Inc. Stinar has a liquidation value of
$2,226,791, which is insufficient to pay its secured creditors and
thus would provide no return to the unsecured creditors of Stinar
or Stinar's sole shareholder, Oakridge nor, by proxy, any unsecured
creditor or equity security holder of Oakridge. Oakridge also
listed on its schedules an intercompany account due from Stinar in
the amount of $422,265 which both debtors believe is more properly
treated as a contribution to capital based on the records of the
two companies including the lack of any intercompany loan
agreements or other documentation. However, based on the low
priority of the alleged loan as insider debt, even if the $422,265
sum was treated as an asset of Oakridge, the asset would only have
value if Stinar funded its plan of reorganization to pay the
insider debt. Stinar does not have the funds available to pay this
additional amount and the DIP lender, Kruckeberg Industries, LLC
would refuse to pay this insider debt even if it were kept on the
books as an intercompany loan. Further, in the case of a
liquidation of Stinar, Oakridge would receive no funds from the
liquidation based on the relative lack of value of Stinar were it
to be liquidated.

Oakridge is a guarantor on one of the two loans taken out by Stinar
from Signature Bank. The Signature Bank loan guaranteed by Oakridge
had a balance of $831,715 as of the filing date. Stinar also has an
additional loan through the Small Business Administration that is
also guaranteed by Oakridge. At the Petition date, the separate SBA
504 Loan had a balance of $632,585. If Stinar were not reorganized
and liquidated the only funds available would go to secured
creditors. Therefore, the Debtor's Unsecured creditors will receive
more under the Plan than under a forced liquidation of the Debtor.

Oakridge, cognizant of the consequences to its creditors in the
event a plan of reorganization is not confirmed, developed its Plan
to liquidate its assets and then dissolve as a corporate entity.
The Plan provides for payment in full of the allowed priority
claims and also provides a recovery for each class of claims above
what they could recover in any other liquidation such as a
liquidation under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

Class II B consists of the general unsecured claims which will
receive a pro-rata share $50,000 payable in two payments over the
next 12 months.

The implementation of the Plan is dependent upon the confirmation
of the plan of reorganization for Stinar and its continued
operation. Stinar, after confirmation, will manage its affairs and
all of its assets and will disburse funds, serving as required as
disbursing agent. Stinar will be responsible for operating its
business, paying expenses and making distributions to creditors as
set forth in both Stinar's plan of reorganization and Oakridge's
Plan. Stinar will provide or pay out of operating funds for all of
its administrative expenses and business debts in the ordinary
course of business, according to the Plan.

The infusion of the additional capital in Stinar from DIP lender
Kruckeberg Industries, LLC, the increase in Stinar's sales force,
the ultimate re-financing of the secured debt, the continued
improvement of the operations of Stinar, the cost-savings achieved
to date and an increasing presence in the marketplace all enhance
the feasibility of Stinar's plan of reorganization and Oakridge's
Plan and its likelihood of success.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb17-31670-110.pdf

A full-text copy of the original Disclosure Statement is available
at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb17-31670-89.pdf

                 About Stinar HG & Oakrdige

Stinar HG, Inc., doing business as The Stinar Corporation, is a
Minnesota-based company that manufactures ground support equipment
for the aviation industry.  The late Frank Stinar founded Stinar
Corp. in 1946.  Stinar's products are used to load, service, and
maintain all types of aircraft for both government and commercial
applications.  The company's corporate headquarters and its
40,000-square foot manufacturing facility are in Eagan, Minnesota.

On June 29, 1998, Oakridge Holdings, Inc. (OTCMKTS:OKRGQ), a
publicly held Minnesota-based company, became the new owner of
Stinar.  Currently, Stinar is the only asset of Oakridge Holdings.

The largest shareholder of Oakridge Holdings is Robert Harvey who
holds approximately 21% of the outstanding shares.

Oakridge Holdings and operating unit Stinar HG filed bankruptcy
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D. Minn. Case Nos. 17-31669 and
17-31670, respectively) on May 22, 2017. Robert C. Harvey, CEO and
president, signed the petitions.

On May 26, 2017, the Court entered an Order allowing the joint
administration of these Chapter 11 cases under Bankr. D. Minn. Case
No. 17-31670.

At the time of filing, debtor Oakridge Holdings disclosed total
assets of $990,237 and total liabilities of $2.17 million, while
debtor Stinar HG disclosed total assets of $8.22 million and total
liabilities of $2.91 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge Kathleen H Sanberg.

The Debtors are represented by Kenneth Edstrom, Esq., at Sapientia
Law Group.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has not yet been
appointed in Debtors' Chapter 11 case, and the U.S. Trustee has
filed notices indicating that they have been unable to form such a
committee as to both Debtors.


PACKARD SQUARE: Dist. Ct. Upholds Ruling Dismissing Bankruptcy Case
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the appeals case captioned PACKARD SQUARE, LLC, Appellant, v.
CAN IV PACKARD SQUARE LLC, O'BRIEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, WOLFF
NETWORKS, LLC, STARKY'S CONSTRUCTION, INC., GEORGETOWN OF ANN ARBOR
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, and MCKINLEY, INC., Appellees, Case No.
17-cv-14078 (E.D. Mich.), District Judge Paul D. Borman affirms
Bankruptcy Judge Thomas J. Tucker's Oct. 13, 2017 opinion and order
dismissing the Debtor's Chapter 11 voluntary petition and barring
the refiling of a new bankruptcy case by or against the Debtor for
a period of two years. The Debtor's appeal is dismissed with
prejudice.

In the bankruptcy appeal, the Court is called upon to determine
whether Judge Tucker erred in dismissing the Chapter 11 voluntary
petition filed by Appellant/Debtor Packard Square LLC and barring
the filing of any new bankruptcy case by or against Packard Square
for a period of two years from the date of his Oct. 13, 2017
ruling. Appellant argues that the Bankruptcy Court erred in finding
that dismissal was in the best interests of both the Debtor and its
creditors and abused its discretion in barring the filing of new
bankruptcy proceedings by (or against) Packard Square, a first-time
filer for protection under the bankruptcy code. Appellee CAN IV
Packard Square LLC argues that neither the dismissal of Debtor's
petition nor the two-year bar on new filings was an abuse of
discretion and urges this Court to affirm the bankruptcy court in
all respects.

The Debtor argues that the bankruptcy court erred in determining
that, given the denial of its DIP motion, the Debtor had no funds
available to complete its mixed-used development project. The
Debtor insists that the bankruptcy court was obligated to "show
cause" the Debtor before dismissing or permit the Debtor to present
additional testimony or evidence as to the Debtor's ability to
finance the Project. But the Debtor cites no authority for imposing
such an obligation on the bankruptcy court's dismissal here under
section 305(a). Neither of the cases cited by the Debtor in support
of this "second chance" argument involved abstention under section
305. The Debtor had its opportunity to convince the bankruptcy
court that it could obtain financing to complete the Project and it
failed in that endeavor. Despite the Debtor's claim to the
contrary, Judge Tucker gave the Debtor fair warning that the
failure of its proposed DIP financing motion would "tip the scales"
in favor of the court abstaining. Yet the Debtor made no argument
for a "second chance" until filing its motion for reconsideration
-- presenting new evidence that the bankruptcy court was under no
obligation, at that point, to consider. All parties agree that time
is of the essence with regard to this partially completed Project.
It was not reasonable, on these facts, for the Debtor to have
assumed that if his first request for DIP financing failed, he
would be able to return to the drawing board and present another
scenario for Judge Tucker's consideration while the time-sensitive
project stood idle, with a State Court Receiver, and a GMP contract
and subcontractors, ready to complete the Project.

It cannot be disputed that, with the denial of the DIP financing
motion, the Debtor had no funds available to it to complete the
project. It is also undisputed that the Debtor represented to the
bankruptcy court that it could not obtain financing on terms
different from those offered in the DIP motion. Judge Tucker
appropriately issued his ruling based on the evidence and
representations before him. The bankruptcy court did not err in
dismissing the Debtor's petition.

The bankruptcy court did not rely on a clearly erroneous finding of
fact, and did not improperly apply the law, when it exercised its
discretion under sections 105(a) and 349(a) to bar the Debtor from
refiling for a period of two years to give the Project a chance to
complete and succeed. The bankruptcy court reasonably believed that
the two-year bar would provide "ample time for the Receiver to
finish completion and stabilization of the Project, and for the
state court receivership case to substantially conclude."

Likewise, it was reasonable for the bankruptcy court to conclude
that "one or more of the creditors" who supported the Debtor's
petition "could file an involuntary bankruptcy case against the
Debtor, leading to the same result as if the Debtor had filed the
new case." Therefore, it was "absolutely necessary" to impose the
bar against third parties "[t]o avoid an abuse of the bankruptcy
system that would be caused by any such attempted evasion" of the
bankruptcy court's abstention. The bankruptcy court's decision to
likewise bar filings against the Debtor was not based on a clearly
erroneous finding of fact or an improper application of the law and
was not, therefore, an abuse of discretion.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 10,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2xTlXLd from Leagle.com.

Packard Square LLC, Appellant, represented by Kim K. Hillary --
KHillary@schaferandweiner.com -- Schafer & Weiner & Jason Weiner --
Jweiner@schaferandweiner.com -- Schafer and Weiner, PLLC.

CAN IV Packard Square LLC, Appellee, represented by Doron Yitzchaki
-- dyitzchaki@dickinsonwright.com -- Dickinson Wright, Michael C.
Hammer -- mhammer@dickinsonwright.com -- Dickinson Wright & Phillip
J. DeRosier -- pderosier@dickinsonwright.com -- Dickinson Wright.

O'Brien Construction Company, Appellee, represented by David E.
Hart -- dhart@maddinhauser.com -- Maddin, Hauser & Martin S.
Frenkel -- mfrenkel@maddinhauser.com -- Maddin, Hauser.

Starky's Construction, Inc, Appellee, represented by Bryan M.
Beckerman, Novara, Tesija & Stephanie J. Addison, Novara Tesija,
PLLC.

Georgetown of Ann Arbor Condominium Association, Appellee,
represented by Melissa D. Francis.

McKinley, Inc., Appellee, represented by Dennis W. Loughlin --
dloughlin@wnj.com -- Warner Norcross & Judd LLP.

Welling, Inc, Interested Party, represented by Roy C. Sgroi, Sgroi
Law Firm.

                      About Packard Square

Packard Square LLC owns a 360,000-square foot mixed-use development
on a six-and-a-half acre site on Packard Street in Ann Arbor,
Michigan.  Once completed, the Company expects the project to be
worth approximately $93,500,000.

Packard Square is currently under receivership.  A receivership
case, CAN IV Packard Square LLC v. Packard Square LLC, Case No.
16-990-CB, Washtenaw County Trial Court, Honorable Archie C. Brown
presiding, was filed, and on Nov. 1, 2016, McKinley, Inc., was
appointed as receiver.

To recover control of the project, Packard Square LLC filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
17-52483) on Sept. 5, 2017, estimating $50 million to $100 million
in assets and less than $50 million in liabilities.

David G. Dragich, Esq., and Amanda Vintevoghel, Esq., at The
Dragich Law Firm PLLC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.
Swistak & Levine, P.C. has been retained as the Debtor's special
counsel.

As of Sept. 6, 2017, no request for appointment of a Chapter 11
trustee or examiner has been made and no official committee has
been appointed.


PACKARD SQUARE: SSSL, BFAI Lack Standing to File Bankruptcy Appeal
------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellants Spittler Strategic Services, LLC, and Built Form
Architecture, Inc., seek to appeal one aspect of U.S. Bankruptcy
Judge Thomas J. Tucker's order issued on Oct. 13, 2017 in the
chapter 11 case of Debtor Packard Square LLC. Spittler and Built
Form, both of whom are creditors of the Debtor appeal the portion
of Judge Tucker's order "Barring the Filing of any New Bankruptcy
Case by or Against the Debtor for a Period of Two Years." Appellee
CAN IV Packard Square, LLC moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of
Appellants' standing. District Judge Paul D. Borman grants the
motion and dismisses the appeal.

"To appeal from an order of the bankruptcy court, appellants must
have been directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by the
order." "This principle, also known as the "person aggrieved"
doctrine, limits standing to persons with a financial stake in the
bankruptcy court's order." "Only when the order directly diminishes
a person's property, increases his burdens, or impairs his rights
will he have standing to appeal."

Spittler and Built Form cannot meet the "person aggrieved" test.
Their only action in the bankruptcy proceedings was filing a joint
concurrence, on Nov. 21, 2017, in support of Debtor Packard Square
LLC's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Dismissal of
Packard Square's Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Court struck
this concurrence on Dec. 1, 2017, because it "amount[ed] to a
"response" to the to Debtor's Reconsideration Motions, and as such,
[was] expressly prohibited" by Eastern District of Michigan local
bankruptcy rules which, like the Eastern District of Michigan
district court rules, prohibit the filing of responses to motions
for reconsideration unless expressly ordered by the Court. Thus,
Spittler and Built Form filed nothing in the bankruptcy proceedings
that became a matter of record in those proceedings and did not
appear at any hearings.

The Appellants insist that the "test" for standing is simply
whether the order "impairs their rights." Appellants ignore a
crucial limitation on the impairment and that is that it be
"direct" and "immediate." In essence, Appellants argue that they
are aggrieved by the Bankruptcy Court's two-year bar because they
may wish to file an involuntary petition sometime in the next two
years and will be precluded from doing so by the Bankruptcy Court's
Order. They offer no evidence of how the bar has had a "direct and
immediate pecuniary impact" on them.

Finally, Appellants offer their unsubstantiated "opinion" that a
reorganization under Chapter 11 will yield more money to Packard
Square's creditors than a continuation of operations under the
direction of the State court Receiver, and therefore, they argue,
the bar on further bankruptcy filings affects their financial
interests. Obviously, Judge Tucker disagreed with this assessment
but in any event this is pure supposition on Appellants' part about
the future efficacy of the state court Receivership, which cannot
supply the requisite direct and immediate pecuniary harm required
to establish standing to appeal the Bankruptcy Court's Order.

Spittler and Built Form have failed to demonstrate that they have
been directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by the Bankruptcy
Court's Oct. 13, 2017 order.

The bankruptcy case is in re: PACKARD SQUARE, LLC, Debtor, Case No.
17-cv-14089 (Bankr. E.D. Mich.).

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 11,
2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2JwBKRu from Leagle.com.

Spittler Strategic Services, LLC & Built Form Architecture, Inc.,
Appellants, represented by Kenneth R. Beams , Kenneth R. Beams,
PLLC.

CAN IV Packard Square LLC, Appellee, represented by Doron Yitzchaki
-- dyitzchaki@dickinsonwright.com -- Dickinson Wright, Michael C.
Hammer -- mhammer@dickinsonwright.com -- Dickinson Wright & Phillip
J. DeRosier -- pderosier@dickinsonwright.com -- Dickinson Wright.

Packard Square LLC, Interested Party, represented by Kim K. Hillary
-- KHillary@schaferandweiner.com -- Schafer & Weiner.

                   About Packard Square

Packard Square LLC owns a 360,000-square foot mixed-use development
on a six-and-a-half acre site on Packard Street in Ann Arbor,
Michigan.  Once completed, the Company expects the project to be
worth approximately $93,500,000.

Packard Square is currently under receivership.  A receivership
case, CAN IV Packard Square LLC v. Packard Square LLC, Case No.
16-990-CB, Washtenaw County Trial Court, Honorable Archie C. Brown
presiding, was filed, and on Nov. 1, 2016, McKinley, Inc., was
appointed as receiver.

To recover control of the project, Packard Square LLC filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
17-52483) on Sept. 5, 2017, estimating $50 million to $100 million
in assets and less than $50 million in liabilities.

David G. Dragich, Esq., and Amanda Vintevoghel, Esq., at The
Dragich Law Firm PLLC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.
Swistak & Levine, P.C. has been retained as the Debtor's special
counsel.

As of Sept. 6, 2017, no request for appointment of a Chapter 11
trustee or examiner has been made and no official committee has
been appointed.


PATRIOT NATIONAL: Court Junks B&B, J. Corbett Bid to Stay TTSL Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider denied defendants Brown & Brown of
New Jersey, LLC and John F. Corbett's request to stay the entire
case captioned TRUSTED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v.
GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Civil No. 16-7094
(JS) (D.N.J.).

Plaintiff's complaint was originally filed in New Jersey State
Court on Sept. 15, 2016 and was removed to federal court on Feb.
13, 2016. The complaint named as defendants Guarantee Insurance
Company, Patriot Underwriters, Inc., and Douglas Cook ("Insurer
Defendants"). Cook was employed by Patriot and worked as its
Marketing Representative. Plaintiff's complaint alleges that in or
about March 2015, the Insurer Defendants offered it the opportunity
to participate in a "Large Deductible" Worker's Compensation
Insurance Program. Plaintiff was allegedly told the deductible
amount for the program was $250,000, a Loss Fund would be set up
with a contribution of $650,000, and that no administrative fees
would be taken out of the Loss Fund. The effective date of the
Program was April 3, 2015. Plaintiff signed a Term Sheet and was
told the premium would be $303,228.00. Plaintiff claims the Insurer
Defendants made unauthorized deductions from the Loss Fund, its
premium payment was higher than represented, and some claims may
have been improperly paid. In addition, plaintiff claims it did not
execute or receive the Program Agreement that was referenced in the
Term Sheet. Plaintiff's six-count complaint asserts claims under
the Consumer Fraud Act, common law fraud, breach of contract,
violation of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of
fiduciary duty and conversion.

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on May 8, 2017 adding B & B
and Corbett as defendants. Corbett was employed by B & B. Plaintiff
alleges B & B assisted plaintiff in obtaining worker's compensation
insurance. Plaintiff alleges B & B and Corbett failed to exercise
reasonable care when they obtained worker's compensation insurance
and they failed to fully investigate the proposal provided by
Guarantee and Patriot.

B & B requests the entire case be stayed until the Insurer
Defendants are no longer subject to the stay in their liquidation
and bankruptcy proceedings. B & B argues it is prejudiced unless
the case is stayed because it "cannot depose Defendants Patriot,
Guarantee, or their employees, including Defendant Cook, nor can it
call them to testify at trial."

Plaintiff opposes B & B's stay request. The crux of plaintiff's
argument is that the claims against B & B and Corbett are separate
and independent from the claims against the Insurer Defendants.
Plaintiff argues the primary claim against B & B is based on broker
malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of special
relationship and fraud, while the claims against the Insurer
Defendants arise under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and breach
of contract. Plaintiff argues, therefore, B & B is not prejudiced
because it can take relevant discovery from the Insurer Defendants.
In addition, plaintiff argues the automatic bankruptcy stay does
not apply to B & B. Not surprisingly, plaintiff also argues it will
be prejudiced by a stay and B & B will not be prejudiced by a
stay.

To the extent the argument is made, the Court finds the automatic
bankruptcy stay does not apply to B & B. Absent "unusual
circumstances" Section 362(a)(1) only stays actions against the
debtor and may not be invoked by solvent codefendants, even if they
are in a similar legal or factual nexus with the debtor.

"Unusual circumstances" do not exist here to warrant staying the
case against B & B pursuant to Section 362 (a)(1). B & B and
Patriot are separate legal entities and plaintiff asserts separate
theories of liability against them. Plaintiff's claims against B &
B are grounded in malpractice while the claims against Patriot are
grounded in fraud and breach of contract. Thus, Patriot is not the
real party in interest insofar as plaintiff's claim against B & B
is concerned. Further, as will be touched on infra, the Court
rejects the argument that plaintiff's case against B & B will
interfere with the Insurer Defendants' reorganization efforts.

After weighing the evidence and equities, and after evaluating the
balance of hardships, the Court finds that the scale weighs in
plaintiff's favor. Therefore, the Court denies the request of B & B
and Corbett to stay the entire case.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
May 11, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2JpspLr from
Leagle.com.

TRUSTED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS, LLC., Plaintiff, represented by
WILLIAM J. DESANTIS -- DESANTISWBALLARDSPAHR.COM -- BALLARD SPAHR
LLP.

GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY, PATRIOT UNDERWRITERS, INC. & DOUGLAS
COOK, Defendants, represented by LARRY CLARENCE GREEN, JR. --
Green.L@wssllp.com -- WINGET SPADAFORA & SCHWARTZBERG LLP &
CHRISTINA MARIE RIEKER -- Rieker@wssllp.com -- WINGET SPADAFORA &
SCHWARTZBERG LLP.

BROWN & BROWN OF NEW JERSEY, LLC & JOHN F. CORBETT, Defendants,
represented by JEFFREY SHAWN POLLACK -- JSPollack@duanemorris.com
-- DUANE MORRIS, LLP & WILLIAM SHOTZBARGER --
Wshotbarger@duanemorris.com -- DUANE MORRIS LLP.

GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANY, DOUGLAS COOK & PATRIOT UNDERWRITERS,
INC., Cross Claimants, represented by LARRY CLARENCE GREEN, JR. ,
WINGET SPADAFORA & SCHWARTZBERG LLP & CHRISTINA MARIE RIEKER,
WINGET SPADAFORA & SCHWARTZBERG LLP.

BROWN & BROWN OF NEW JERSEY, LLC & JOHN F. CORBETT, Cross
Defendants, represented by JEFFREY SHAWN POLLACK, DUANE MORRIS,
LLP.

                 About Patriot National

Fort Lauderdale, Florida-based Patriot National, Inc., also known
as Old Guard Risk Services, Inc., through its subsidiaries,
provides agency, underwriting and policyholder services to its
insurance carrier clients, primarily in the workers' compensation
sector.  Patriot National -- http://www.patnat.com/-- provides
general agency services, technology outsourcing, software
solutions, specialty underwriting and policyholder services, claims
administration services and self-funded health plans to its
insurance carrier clients, employers and other clients.  Patriot
was incorporated in Delaware in November 2013.

The Company completed its initial public offering in January 2015
and its common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol "PN."

Patriot National, Inc., and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 18-10189) on Jan. 30, 2018.  In the
petitions signed by CRO James S. Feltman, the Debtors disclosed
$159.4 million in total assets and $242.2 million in total debt as
of Dec. 31, 2017.

The Debtors have tapped Laura Davis Jones, Esq., James E. O'Neill,
Esq., and Peter J. Keane, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones
LLP and Kathryn A. Coleman, Esq., Christopher Gartman, Esq., and
Jacob Gartman, Esq., at Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP as bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as co-counsel and
conflicts counsel; Duff & Phelps, LLC, as financial advisor; and
Conway Mackenzie Management Services, LLC, as provider of EVP of
Finance and related advisory services.  Prime Clerk LLC --
https://cases.primeclerk.com/patnat -- is the Debtors' claims,
noticing and balloting agent.

James S. Feltman of Duff & Phelps, LLC, has been tapped as chief
restructuring officer to the Debtors.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee has named two creditors -- Jessica
Barad and MCMC LLC -- to serve on an official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.


PEGASUS VIP: Taps Jesse Aguinaga as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Pegasus VIP & Tour Services, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire Jesse
Aguinaga, Attorney at Law, P.C. as its legal counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the preparation of a bankruptcy
plan and will provide other legal services related to its Chapter
11 case.

The firm will charge an hourly fee of $325 for its services.

Jesse Aguinaga, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
disclosed in a court filing that he is a "disinterested person" as
defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jesse Aguinaga, Esq.
     Jesse Aguinaga, Attorney at Law, P.C.
     The Center
     8323 Southwest Freeway, Suite 670
     Houston, TX 77074
     Phone: (713) 772-7986
     Fax: (713) 772-7725
     E-mail: jfa@aguinagaandassociates.com

                About Pegasus VIP & Tour Services

Pegasus VIP & Tour Services, LLC, sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 18-32528) on
May 12, 2018.  In the petition signed by Juan Emerson-Caballero,
manager and sole member, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $50,000.


POST OAK REALTY: Jones Lang to Auction 100% LLC Interests
---------------------------------------------------------
Jones Lang LaSalle, on behalf of BREF IV Series A LLC ("original
secured party"), or its assignee offers for sale at public auction
on July 10, 2018, at 3:00 p.m., in the offices of Cleary Gottlieb
Steen & Hamilton LLP, One Liberty Plaza, New York, New York 10006,
connection with the a Uniform Commercial Code sale:

   a) 100% of the limited liability company membership interests in
Post Oak Realty Group LLC;

   b) the 99.5% limited partner interest in Post Oak Realty
Investment Partners LP, which is the sole owner of the property
commonly known as the "Park Towers" located at 1233 & 1333 West
Loop South, Houston, Texas;

   c) 100% of the limited liability company membership interests in
Innova Realty Group LLC; and

   d) the 99.5% limited partner interest in Innova Entertainment
Investment Partners LP, which is the sole owner of the property
commonly known as "Innova Theater and Retail" located at 3839
Weslayan Street and 3838 Norfolk Street, Houston, Texas.

The Post Oak Interests are owned by 610 Investment Partners LP and
the Innova Interests are owned by Weslayan Entertainment Investment
Partners LP ("Mezzanine Borrower"), each having its principal place
of business at 13355 Noel Road, 22nd Floor, Dallas, Texas 75240.

The original secured party, as lender, has made a loan to the
mezzanine borrower.  In connection with the mezzanine loan, the
mezzanine borrower has granted to the original secured party a
first priority lien on the interests pursuant to those certain
pledge and security agreements.  Prior to the sale, the original
secured party will assign the mezzanine loan and related documents
to the new secured party.  The original secured party and,
following the assignment, the new secured party is offering the
interests for sale in connection with the foreclosure on the pledge
of such interests.  The mezzanine loan is subordinate to a mortgage
loan and other obligations and liabilities of the senior borrower
or otherwise affecting the property.

All bids must be for cash, and the successful bidder must be
prepared to deliver immediately available good funds within 24
hours after the sale and otherwise comply with the bidding
requirements.  Further information concerning the interests, the
requirements for obtaining information and bidding on the interests
and the terms of sale can be found at
https://www.parktowersandinnovauccforeclosure.com/

Jones Lang can be reached at:

   Kellogg C. Gaines
   Managing Director
   Jones Lang LaSalle, IP, Inc.
   330 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor
   New York, NY 10017
   Tel: +1 212 812 5907
   E-mail: kellogg.gaines@am.jll.com

             - or -

   Brett Rosenberg
   Vice President
   330 Madison Avenue, 4th Floor
   New York, NY 10017
   Tel: +1 212 812 5926
   Email: brett.rosenberg@am.jll.com


PREMIER PCS: Unsecureds to Get 60% to 100% in Installment Payments
------------------------------------------------------------------
Premier PCS OF TX, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Texas its first amended disclosure
statement, dated May 29, 2018, describing the plan of
reorganization originally filed on March 26, 2018.

The latest plan provides that general unsecured creditors are
classified in classes and are being offered distribution ranging
from 60% to 100% of their allowed claims respectively, to be
distributed in installment payments.

The Plan Proponent believes that the Debtor will have enough cash
on hand on the Effective Date of the Plan to pay all the claims and
expenses that are entitled to be paid on that date.

The Plan Proponent's financial projections show that the Debtor
will have a positive annual average cash flow, after paying
operating expenses and post-confirmation taxes and Plan payments,
over its five-year interval. The final Plan payment is expected to
be paid on July 10, 2023.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that general
unsecured creditors under the plan are being offered distribution
ranging from 75% to 100% of their allowed claims respectively, to
be distributed in installment payments.

A full-text copy of the First Amended Disclosure Statement is
available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb17-32021-231.pdf

                 About Premier PCS of TX

Based in El Paso, Texas, Premier PCS of TX, LLC, provides computer
maintenance and repair services.  Premier PCS of TX, based in El
Paso, TX, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
17-32021) on Dec. 6, 2017.  In the petition signed by Richard Ahn,
managing member, the Debtor estimated $500,000 to $1 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The Hon.
Christopher H. Mott presides over the case.  E.P. Bud Kirk, a
partner at the law firm of E.P. Bud Kirk, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.


PRO-SEC CORP: Hearing on Plan, Disclosures Set for July 5
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jerrold N. Poslusny, Jr. of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey conditionally approved Pro-Spec
Corporation's small business disclosure statement dated May 25,
2018.

Jun 28, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the Disclosure Statement and confirmation of
the Plan, and the last day for filing written acceptances or
rejections of the Plan.

A hearing will be held on July 5, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. for final
approval of the Disclosure Statement (if a written objection has
been timely filed) and for confirmation of the Plan.

                      About Pro-Spec

Founded in 1980, Pro-Spec Industrial Painting Services is an SSPC
QP1 and QP2 Certified Contractor, and offers industrial coatings,
abrasive blast preparation, and containment of concrete and steel
structures.

Based in Vineland, New Jersey, Pro-Spec filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-25463) on July 31, 2017.  In the
petition signed by Ronald W. Yarbrough, its president, the Debtor
estimated 100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Jerrold N.
Poslusny Jr.  Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq., at Ciardi Ciardi &
Astin, serves as counsel to the Debtor.


QUADRANT 4: Files Chapter 11 Joint Plan of Liquidation
------------------------------------------------------
Quadrant 4 System Corporation, Stratitude, Inc. and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors filed a disclosure statement for
their proposed joint plan of liquidation dated June 1, 2018.

Following Q4's acquisition of Stratitude's outstanding common stock
on Nov. 3, 2016, Stratitude became a wholly owned subsidiary of Q4.
Thereafter, although operated separately from their respective
principal offices in Illinois and California, both companies had
the same Boards and principal officers. As "affiliates" under the
Bankruptcy Code, immediately upon the commencement of the
Stratitude Chapter 11 Case, the Debtors sought and received the
entry of an order on Oct. 19, 2017, authorizing the joint
administration of the Q4 Chapter 11 Case and the Stratitude Chapter
11 Case. This meant that the Chapter 11 Cases would have all
motions and pleadings filed under one case number (the previously
filed Q4 Chapter 11 Case), and proceed on the same hearing
schedules to the extent practicable. Many matters impacted both
Debtors and were heard the same day, and for those matters
particular to one or the other Debtor, all parties and the
Bankruptcy Court attempted to schedule hearings on the same day to
address such individual matters.

The Plan proposes to continue this procedure to obviate the need
for another liquidating trustee, duplicate notices, applications,
and orders, and thereby save considerable time and expense for the
Debtors and, consequently, their Estates.

The Liquidating Trustee will maintain separate accounts and
segregate funds generated by or from claims and/or causes of action
in favor of Q4 and Stratitude, as the case may be to the extent
practicable insofar as certain Causes of Action may equally affect
both Estates, in which case the Liquidating Trustee may have to
equally divide such monies, or make such apportionment as he deems
fair and reasonable in his business judgment.

The Plan also provides for the sale, liquidation or other
disposition of all assets in the Debtors' Estates in order that
Creditor distributions can be maximized and accomplished as soon as
is practicable after the Plan's confirmation. All tangible and
intangible personal property assets utilized in the operation of
the Debtors' businesses have been sold and/or liquidated pursuant
to prior orders of the Bankruptcy Court.

Under the Plan, the Liquidating Trustee will pay each Allowed Class
4 General Unsecured Claim Pro Rata from available funds. The
Liquidating Trustee will make a distribution to each Holder of an
Allowed Class 4 Claim within the later of: (a) 30 days of the
Liquidating Trustee's determination that there are funds sufficient
to make a distribution to Holders of Allowed Class 4 Claims; and
(b) 30 days of a disputed Class 4 Claim being Allowed by a final,
non-appealable order of the Bankruptcy Court.

Allowed Class 4(a) General Unsecured Claims will be paid initially
from: any Net Proceeds from Q4 Causes of Action; and any other
proceeds obtained by the Liquidating Trustee upon liquidation of
the "Q4 Liquidating Trust Assets" as applicable. To the extent any
Net Proceeds remain after satisfaction of all Class 4(b) Claims,
such Net Proceeds will be distributed to Q4 as the sole owner of
Stratitude and distributed by the Liquidating Trustee under the
Plan. Allowed Class 4(b) General Unsecured Claims will be paid
initially from: (a) any Net Proceeds from Stratitude Causes of
Action; and (b) any other proceeds obtained by the Liquidating
Trustee upon liquidation of the "Stratitude Liquidating Trust
Assets" as applicable.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-19689-408.pdf

                About Quadrant 4 System

Quadrant 4 System Corporation (OTC:QFOR) -- http://www.qfor.com/--
sells IT products and services.  Its revenues are primarily
generated from the placement of staffing or solution consultants,
and the sale and licensing of its proprietary cloud-based Software
as a Service (SaaS) systems, as well as a wide range of technology
oriented services and solutions.  The company's principal executive
offices are located in Schaumburg Illinois.  It also operates its
business from various offices located in Naples, Florida;
Alpharetta, Georgia; Bingham Farms, Michigan; Cranbury, New Jersey;
Pleasanton, California; and Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Quadrant 4 is the 100% owner of the issued and outstanding common
stock of Stratitude, Inc., a California corporation, which it
acquired on or about Nov. 3, 2016.  Concurrently with the
Stratitude Acquisition, Stratitude acquired certain of the assets
of Agama Solutions, Inc., a California corporation.  Both
Stratitude and Agama are located in Pleasanton and Fremont,
California and are engaged in the IT business.

Quadrant 4 disclosed total assets of $47.05 million and total
liabilities of $31.39 million as of Sept. 30, 2016.

Quadrant 4 filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No.
17-19689) on June 29, 2017.   Stratitude, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-30724) on Oct. 13, 2017.
The case is jointly administered with that of Quadrant 4.

Quadrant 4, which was subject to a securities fraud probe that led
to the arrest and resignation of its top two executives seven
months ago, sought Chapter 11 protection after reaching a
settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and
signing deals to sell four business segments for at least $6.9
million.

The Debtors' cases are assigned to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer.

The Debtors' bankruptcy counsel is Adelman & Gettleman Ltd.  Nixon
Peabody LLP acts as special counsel to the Debtors for matters
concerning taxes, labor, ERISA, securities compliance,
international law, and related matters while Faegre Baker Daniels
LLP acts as special counsel for securities litigation.  The Debtors
hired Silverman Consulting Inc. as financial consultant, and
Livingstone Partners, LLC, as investment banker.

On July 10, 2017, an official committee of unsecured creditors was
appointed in the Debtor's case.  The Committee retained Sugar
Felsenthal Grais & Hammer LLP as its legal counsel, and Amherst
Partners, LLC, as its financial advisor.


RANDOLPH AND RANDOLPH: Taps David McAlister as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Randolph and Randolph LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Alabama to retain David
McAlister, Esq., as special counsel.

The attorney will continue to assist the Debtor in a case (Case No.
17-CV-01211) filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Alabama.  

Mr. McAlister charges an hourly fee of $150 for his services.
Paralegals charge $75 per hour.

The attorney "has no actual conflict" with respect to the services
it provides to the Debtor, according to court filings.

Mr. McAlister maintains an office at:

     David L. McAlister, Esq.
     100 Vestavia Parkway
     Birmingham, AL 35216
     Phone: 205-949-2934
     Fax: 205-822-2057
     Email: dmcalister@carrallison.com

                   About Randolph and Randolph

Randolph and Randolph LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 17-72125) on Dec. 8,
2017.  In the petition signed by Harold E. Randolph, its member,
the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of
less than $100,000.  Judge Jennifer H. Henderson presides over the
case.  Newell & Holden, LLC, is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


REGIONAL EVANGELICAL: Hires Hinkle Law Firm LLC as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Regional Evangelical Alliance of Churches, Inc., seeks authority
from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas
(Wichita) to hire Edward J. Nazar, Esq. of Hinkle Law Firm, L.L.C.
as counsel.

Professional services to be rendered by Hinkle Law Firm are:

     a. advise the Debtor of its rights, powers and duties as a
Debtor-in-Possession, including those with respect to the continued
operation and management of its business and property;

     b. advise the Debtor concerning and assisting in the
negotiation and documentation of financing agreements, cash
collateral orders and related transactions;

     c. investigate into the natures and validity of liens asserted
against the property of the Debtor and advising the Debtor
concerning the enforceability of said liens;

     d. invest and advise the Debtor concerning and rake such
actions as may be necessary to collect income and assets in
accordance with applicable law, and recover property for the
benefit of the Debtor's estate;

     e. prepare on behalf of the Debtor such applications, motions,
pleasings, orders, noticesm schedules and other documents as may be
necessary and approriate, and review the financial and other
reports to filed;

     f. advise the Debtor's concerns and prepare responses to
applications, motions, pleadins, notices and other documents which
may be filed and served;

     g. counsel the Debtor in connection with the formulation,
negotiation and promulgation of plan or plans of reorganization and
related documents; and

     h. perform such other legal services for and on behalf of the
Debtor as may be necessary and appropriate in the administration of
the case.

Hinkle Law's current hourly rates are:

     Edward J. Nazar          $300
     Martin R. Ufford         $265
     W. Thomas Gilman         $265
     Nicholas R. Grillot      $215

Edward J. Nazar, attorney at Hinkle Law Firm, attests that his firm
is a disinterested part in this matter and does not represent an
interest adverse to the estate.

The counsel can be reached through:

     Edward J. Nazar, Esq.
     HINKLE LAW FIRM, L.L.C.
     1617 North Waterfront Parkway, Suite 400
     Wichita, KS 67206-6639
     Tel: 316-267-2000
     Fax: 316-264-1518
     Email: ebn1@hinklaw.com
            enazar@hinklaw.com

                   About Regional Evangelical
                    Alliance of Churches, Inc.

Regional Evangelical Alliance of Churches, Inc. filed as a Single
Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101 (51B)),
whose principal assets are located at 7501 Belinder Avenue, Prairie
Village, Kansas.  The Property is valued by the company at $1.91
million.

Regional Evangelical Alliance of Churches, Inc. filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 18-11065) on June 1, 2018.  In
the petition signed by Craig McElvain, executive director, the
Debtor disclosed $1.95 million in total assets and $1.84 million in
total liabilities.  Edward J. Nazar, Esq., at HINKLE LAW FIRM,
L.L.C., is the Debtor's counsel.


RELATIVITY MEDIA: Metz' Claim Against Kavanaugh Without Merit
-------------------------------------------------------------
In the well-publicized bankruptcy proceedings surrounding
Relativity Media, Platform Media Group (PMG) on June 8, 2018,
disclosed that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael E. Wiles ruled Carey
Metz' claim against Ryan Kavanaugh improper and without merit.
Judge Wiles instructed Metz to withdraw his State Court action
against Mr. Kavanaugh and had no grounds to bring the action in
question.

A link to the two-page ruling is available at https://is.gd/2Hequs


Mr. Kavanaugh spokesperson Henry Eshelman said, "We could not be
more pleased with The Honorable Judge Wiles' finding.  Simply
stated, Mr. Metz lost and his claims were disallowed.

"This ruling is significant as it hopefully serves as an
instructive example of how irresponsible reporting can mislead an
entire industry.

"Anyone with $500 can file a lawsuit that says anything at all,
even if it contains no truth.  'Litigation privilege' protects the
person who filed the case, even if everything stated in it is
false, and knowingly filed with an intent to harm.  Specifically,
other than prevailing in a case, there is absolutely no relief or
forum reviewing these suits for truth or accuracy."

Mr. Eshelman continued, "As was done here, the press then picks up
the information from the suit and presents it as fact, which
generates a misleading and false public story line.  In this case,
Metz never even served Kavanaugh; rather, Kavanaugh read about it
in the media, which was exactly what Metz had counted on.  After
sending the unfiled suit to the press, he attempted to use the
press to garner a settlement by threatening to continue to send
negative information to media unless Kavanaugh settled with him.

"As with the recent matter of RKA, which was dismissed with
prejudice after the court found a complete lack of evidence to
proceed with a claim against Kavanaugh, the same holds true here.
Prior to the court ruling certain media outlets wrote articles
implying the unfounded (and now proven false) allegations against
Mr. Kavanaugh were true.

"These outlets needs to realize the power and responsibility they
hold.  People believe what they read.  As with RKA, no one should
have to endure a barrage of negative press with implications of
wrongdoing before those implications are actually proven.

"The Metz action was published widely in the press, with each story
implying Kavanaugh had done what the suit had claimed.  This result
-- that Metz' case had no merit and his claims were false --- shows
why the media need to be more responsible and not write about
unproven allegations.

"It is a relief to see the justice system work, and with the
judge's action, Kavanaugh now has absolutely no further
Relativity-related court defense litigation pending, as he
prevailed in each and every case."

                      About Relativity Media

Relativity Media, LLC, is an American media company headquartered
in Beverly Hills, California, founded in 2004 by Lynwood Spinks and
Ryan Kavanaugh.

Relativity Media and its affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 18-11358)
on May 3, 2018.  This is the company's second trip to Chapter 11.
Relativity Media LLC and its affiliates, including Relativity
Fashion, LLC, previously sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code on July 30, 2015 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
15-11989).

In the petitions signed by Colin M. Adams, CRO, Relativity Media
estimated assets of $100 million to $500 million and liabilities of
$500 million to $1 billion.  

Judge Michael E. Wiles presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Winston & Strawn LLP as their legal counsel;
M-III Partners, LP, as restructuring advisor; and Prime Clerk LLC
as noticing and claims consultant.


RENNOVA HEALTH: Completes Purchase of 85-Bed Hospital in Tennessee
------------------------------------------------------------------
Rennova Health, Inc., has completed an acquisition of its second
hospital by closing the previously reported Asset Purchase
Agreement to acquire an eighty five bed acute care hospital, based
in Jamestown, Tennessee for approximately $635,000 from Community
Health Systems, Inc.  Diligence, legal and other costs associated
with the acquisition are estimated to be approximately $500,000
meaning the total cost of acquisition to the Company is
approximately $1,100,000.

Jamestown TN Medical Center, Inc. is an 85 bed facility of
approximately 90,000 square feet on over eight acres of land, which
offers a 24-hour Emergency Department with two spacious trauma bays
and seven private exam rooms, inpatient and outpatient medical
services and a Progressive Care Unit which provides telemetry
services.  The acquisition also included a separate Physician
Practice which will now operate under Rennova as Mountain View
Physician Practice, Inc.

Annual revenues in recent years have been approximately $15 million
net revenues per annum with government payers including Medicare
and Medicaid accounting for in excess of 60% of the payor mix.
Rennova does not expect that to change significantly in the near
future.

"We believe this acquisition complements our previously purchased
hospital in Oneida TN, and the two hospitals located within one
hour drive from each other create a number of synergies and
efficiencies for services and management," said Seamus Lagan, chief
executive officer of Rennova.  "We look forward to expanding the
needed services we offer these local communities and believe this
acquisition increases the opportunity and value for our
shareholders."

                       About Rennova Health

Rennova Health, Inc. -- http://www.rennovahealth.com/-- provides
diagnostics and supportive software solutions to healthcare
providers.  The Company's principal lines of business are
diagnostic laboratory services, supportive software solutions and
decision support and informatics services.  The company is
headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Rennova Health reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $108.53 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$32.61 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  As of Dec. 31,
2017, Rennova Health had $6.29 million in total assets, $41.06
million in total liabilities, $5.83 million in redeemable preferred
stock, and a total stockholders' deficit of $40.61 million.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm Green &
Company, CPAs, in Tampa, Florida, the Company's auditor since 2015,
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the
Company has significant net losses, cash flow deficiencies,
negative working capital and accumulated deficit.  Those conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern.


REO HOLDINGS: Contempt Conviction Against Owner Affirmed
--------------------------------------------------------
The Court of Appeals of Tennessee affirms the judgment of the trial
court and supports its contempt conviction against Appellant
Charles Walker in the case captioned FAMILY TRUST SERVICES, LLC, ET
AL. v. REO HOLDINGS, LLC, ET AL, No. M2016-02524-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.
App.).

Walker's appeal of a conviction for criminal contempt arises out of
a suit filed by Family Trust Services, LLC, and Billy Gregory, who
are in the business of buying and/or redeeming real property sold
at delinquent tax sales. The Plaintiffs filed suit against its
competitor, REO Holdings, LLC, its owners Walker and Jon Paul
Johnson, and its employees Julie Coone, Merdan Ibrahim, and
Nationwide Investments, LLC for fraud in the use of the tax-sale
and redemption process for real property. Plaintiffs asserted
claims for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act and the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act;
slander of title; fraud; violation of Tennessee Code Annotated
section 30-2-712 (recording false affidavits); liability pursuant
to Tennessee Code section 66-22-113 (failure to discharge the
duties and obligations of a notary public); trespass and ejectment;
and civil conspiracy. The Plaintiffs sought injunctive and
declaratory relief, compensatory and punitive damages, and relief
from judgments finalizing redemptions and quieting title to
properties that were obtained by Defendants' alleged fraud.

The trial court issued a temporary injunction, prohibiting
defendants from, inter alia, recording deeds in real estate
transactions without an authentic notary seal on the documents and
requiring defendants to notify the court and opposing counsel of
any documents they intended to record in the Register's Office.
Appellant, the owner of the business which was the subject of the
injunction, subsequently formed a trust in which Appellant retained
the right to direct the distribution of income and principal and to
amend, revoke, or terminate the trust. The trustee of the trust was
conveyed real property in trust and recorded the deed without the
notice required by the injunction. The property was subsequently
sold, and, at Appellant's instruction, a portion of the proceeds of
sale used to pay Appellant's legal fees for a related proceeding;
the trial court held that, in so doing, the Appellant willfully and
for a bad purpose violated the injunction, and held him in
contempt. On appeal, Appellant argues that the evidence is
insufficient to support the conviction.

Mr. Walker does not contend that the injunction was unlawful or
ambiguous; he asserts that the evidence is insufficient to
establish that he violated the injunction, or alternatively, that
he did so willfully. Specifically, he argues that there is
insufficient proof to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the
Substitute Trustee's Deed was recorded by an agent of Mr. Walker
because "Mr. Jamaal L. Boykin's testimony did not establish, beyond
a reasonable doubt, that he directed the recording of the
Substitute Trustee's Deed, and the prosecution presented no other
evidence on this point."

The injunction was issued in this case to ensure that every deed
the Defendants filed complied with the statutory filing
requirements pertaining to real property documents; the court found
that Defendants' registration of forged real estate documents posed
substantial risk to the public welfare. The evidence is clear that,
after the injunction was issued, Mr. Walker established the All Amp
Trust, a revocable trust in which he retained the right to direct
the accumulation and distribution of trust assets, and in which Mr.
Boykin was named trustee. The corpus of the trust was $250 cash and
the Laurenwood Drive property which was conveyed to Mr. Boykin "as
Trustee for the All Amp Trust." Pursuant to his positon as trustee,
Mr. Boykin was bound to follow Mr. Walker's directions relative to
the trust property, including recording the deed conveying that
property to the trust and, upon its subsequent sale in March 2016,
distributing a portion of the proceeds to pay Mr. Walker's legal
fees.

Recording the Substitute Trustee's Deed without adhering to the
notice requirement of the injunction demonstrated "willful
disobedience or resistance" to the injunction, and is directly
attributable to Mr. Walker. Taken in its entirety and in context,
the proof is beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Walker, as settlor
of the trust and its sole beneficiary, sought "to evade
responsibility for violating an injunction by doing through
subterfuge that which, while not in terms a violation, yet produces
the same effect by accomplishing substantially that which [he]
w[as] enjoined from doing," i.e., causing a deed to be recorded
without adhering to the terms of the injunction. This willful
conduct violated the injunction and supports Mr. Walker's
conviction of criminal contempt.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated May 14, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2M4MCIh from Leagle.com.

William T. Ramsey -- ramseywt@nealharwell.com -- Thomas H. Dundon
-- tdundon@nealharwell.com -- and J. Isaac Sanders --
isanders@nealharwell.com -- Nashville, Tennessee, for the
appellant, Charles Edward Walker.

Eugene N. Bulso and Paul J. Krog -- pkrog@leaderbulso.com --
Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Family Trust Services,
LLC, Steven D. Reigle, Regal Homes, Co., Billy G. Gregory, John R.
Sherrod, III.

Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General and Reporter; Andree S.
Blumstein , Solicitor General; and Alexander S. Rieger, Deputy
Attorney General, for the Office of the Attorney General and
Reporter.

                  About REO Holdings LLC

REO Holdings, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
W.D. Tenn. Case No. 16-10414) on Feb. 29, 2016.  The Debtor is
represented by Thomas Harold Strawn Jr., Esq.

On May 6, 2016, the case was transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.

On July 29, 2016, the bankruptcy court ordered the appointment of
Eva M. Lemeh as trustee.  The trustee hired Manier & Herod, P.C.,
as special counsel; and Alexander Thompson Arnold PLLC as
accountant.

On Feb. 29, 2016, Charles E. Walker, who owns a 50% interest in the
Debtor, filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Tennessee
(Case No. 16-10413).  On May 6, 2016, the case was transferred to
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.  On
Aug. 1, 2016, John C. McLemore was appointed to serve as the
Chapter 11 trustee for Mr. Walker.


ROBERT T. WINZINGER: Taps Taylor and Keyser as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Robert T. Winzinger, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Jersey to hire Taylor and Keyser, LLC
as special counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in negotiating and preparing an
agreement in connection with the sale of its Franklinville
recycling real estate.

Robert Keyser, Esq., at Taylor and Keyser, disclosed in a court
filing that he and his firm are "disinterested" as defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

         Robert W. Keyser, Esq.
         Taylor and Keyser, LLC
         89 Haddon Avenue, Suite B2
         Haddonfield, NJ 08033
         Phone: (609) 803-2180
         Fax: (856) 494-1191
         E-mail: rkeyser@taylorandkeyser.com

                   About Robert T. Winzinger

Founded in 1960, Robert T. Winzinger, Inc. -- http://winzinger.com/
-- is a full-service contractor for roads, excavation, land
development and demolition, utility and marine construction, and
recycling technologies.  Winzinger is certified as a W.B.E. with
the N.J. Dept. of Treasury - Division of Property Management &
Construction; Licensed Contractor with City of Philadelphia; Small
Business Enterprise with the City of Philadelphia; Small Business
Enterprise with the State of New Jersey; Public Works Contractor
with the State of New Jersey; Home Improvement Contractor with the
State of New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs; and Maintains a
Certificate of Employee Report with the State of New Jersey.

Robert T. Winzinger, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.J. Case No. 17-25972) on Aug. 7, 2017.  In the petition signed
by Audrey Winzinger, vice president, secretary, and treasurer, the
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $1
million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Kathryn C. Ferguson is the case judge.

David A. Kasen, Esq., at Kasen & Kasen, serves as the Debtor's
counsel.


ROCKFORT BUILDERS: Court Junks IIG Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction
------------------------------------------------------------------
Appellant 2000 IIG, Inc. in the appeals case captioned 2000 IIG,
INC., Appellant, v. ROCKFORT BUILDERS, INC., AND ASIF WAHEED,
Appellees, No. 14-17-00009-CV (Tex. App) appeals from the trial
court's order to release to appellee Asif Waheed the injunction
bond funds being in the court registry, claiming the trial court
failed to consider damages suffered by appellant due to the
injunction. Appellees Rockfort Builders, Inc., and Asif Waheed seek
dismissal of the appeal and sanctions, asserting the court lacks
jurisdiction because there is no final, appealable order. The Texas
Court of Appeals dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant asserts it was damaged during the "injunction period" and
the trial court abused its discretion by not considering its
alleged damages before releasing the bond funds to appellee
Waheed.

Appellees filed a motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions
challenging the Court's jurisdiction over the trial court's
post-judgment release of the bond funds. Appellees contend the
trial court's order releasing the bond funds was a ministerial
order of disbursement and non-appealable.

Here, appellant challenges a bond disbursement order issued seven
years post-judgment. The Court previously held that a "bond
disbursement order is not a final appealable order." In Lovall, the
bond disbursement order provided for disbursement of funds directed
by the judgment, akin to a writ of execution.

However, where a post-trial order releasing funds imposes
obligations not directed by the judgment, an appellate court has
jurisdiction to review that order. Here, the order releasing funds
back to the appellees, who deposited the funds, supports the take
nothing judgments entered by the trial court in 2009. Therefore,
the appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appellees included in their appellate brief a motion for sanctions
arguing that appellant's appeal is frivolous and that appellant
should be sanctioned pursuant to Rule 45 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure. Under Rule 45, a court of appeals may award
"just damages" as a sanction if it determines that an appeal is
frivolous. The Court, however, finds that the appeal does not
present egregious circumstances and decline to award damages.

Accordingly, the Court grants appellees' motion to dismiss and deny
their motion for sanctions under Tex. R. App. P. 45. The Court
dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A full-text copy of the Memorandum Opinion dated May 8, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2M86mdS from Leagle.com.

Jeffery B. Kaiser, George Frederick May, for Rockfort Builders,
Inc. and Asif Waheed, Appellee.

Farha Ahmed -- farha@farhaahmedlaw.com -- for 2000 IIG Inc.,
Appellant.


ROYAL T ENERGY: Unsecureds to Recover 25% of Allowed Claims
-----------------------------------------------------------
Royal T Energy, LLC submits a disclosure statement describing its
plan of reorganization, dated May 29, 2018, which proposes to
restructure its current indebtedness and continue its operations to
provide a dividend to the creditors of Debtor.

The Debtor's current business operations consist of providing
hauling services for the oil & gas industry in west Texas. Under
the proposed Plan, the Debtor will continue to operate and will
make certain cash payments to creditors to fund the Plan.

Class 12 General Unsecured Creditors of $5,000 or less are impaired
and will be satisfied as follows: All General Unsecured Creditors
with Allowed Claims of $5,000 or less or any General Unsecured
Creditor of $5,001 or more who elects to be treated as a Class 12
Claimant, will be paid 25% of their Allowed Claim in two equal
payments. The first payment 60 days after the Effective Date and
the second payment 60 day thereafter. Based upon the Debtor's
Schedules the total amount of Class 12 creditors should not exceed
$215,000.

Class 13 General Unsecured Creditors of $5,001 or more are impaired
and will be satisfied as follows: All Allowed General Unsecured
Creditors with Allowed Claims of $5,001 or more will receive their
pro rata share of 60 monthly payments of $10,000 commencing 90 days
after the Effective Date. Based upon the Debtor's records, the
General Unsecured Creditors over $5,001 would expect to receive a
total distribution of approximately 25% of their Allowed Class 13
Claim. Any Class 13 Claim of James Alexander or Gabriel Valeriano
will not receive distribution as a Class 13 creditor.

Under the terms of this Plan, all property which is to be paid for
under the Plan will be vested in the name of the Reorganized
Debtor. All parties currently liable on any indebtedness dealt with
in the Plan, will remain liable and to the extent previously liable
on any indebtedness dealt with under the Plan, the Reorganized
Debtor will also be responsible for the repayment up to the amounts
provided for under this Plan.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb17-42386-171.pdf

                  About Royal T Energy LLC

Headquartered in Sherman, Texas, Royal T Energy, LLC, is a
privately-owned company that provides petroleum haulage services.
It operates an oilfield services company, consisting largely of
hauling and disposal of materials related to the hydraulic
fracturing industry.  The Company's operations are conducted
primarily in the Permian Basin, near Pecos, Texas.

Royal T Energy filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
E.D. Tex. Case No. 17-42386) on Nov. 1, 2017.  In the petition
signed by James Alexander, member-manager, the Debtor estimated its
assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities at between $10 million
and $50 million.  Judge Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the case.
Nathan M. Johnson, Esq., at Spector & Johnson, PLLC, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


SCHLETTER INC: District Court Stays B. Curry, et al., Lawsuit
-------------------------------------------------------------
District Judge Martin Reidinger entered an order staying the civil
action captioned BRYAN CURRY, TERRAN BROOKS, JERMAINE WILLIS, and
BRYAN HOPPER on behalf of themselves and all others otherwise
similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SCHLETTER, INC., Defendant,
Civil Case No. 1:17-cv-00001-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C.).

The Defendant has filed a notice with the Court that it has filed a
bankruptcy case under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy
Code. It is well-settled that "[w]hen litigation is pending against
the debtor at the time a bankruptcy case is commenced, the
litigation is stayed automatically." Accordingly, the Court stays
the action pending the Defendant's bankruptcy proceedings.

A copy of the Court's Order dated May 15, 2018 is available at
https://bit.ly/2HIBVYA from Leagle.com.

Bryan Curry, Terran Brooks, Jermaine Willis & Brian Hopper, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
represented by John A. Yanchunis, Morgan & Morgan Complex
Litigation Group, pro hac vice & Jean S. Martin, Law Office of Jean
Sutton Martin.

Schletter Inc., Defendant, represented by James Michael Honeycutt
-- mhoneycutt@fisherphillips.com -- Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Adam
Mark Bridgers -- abridgers@fisherphillips.com -- Fisher & Phillips
LLP.

                    About Schletter Inc.

Schletter Inc. -- https://www.schletter.us -- is a manufacturer of
photovoltaic mounting systems made of aluminum and steel for
utility-scale, commercial, and residential PV applications.  The
Company is part of the Schletter Group that manufactures mounting
systems for roofs, facades and open areas (solar farms) as well as
solar carports.  With production facilities in Germany, the USA and
China as well as an international network of distribution and
service companies, the Schletter Group is active in all important
international markets.

Schletter Inc., based in Shelby, NC, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 18-40169) on April 24, 2018.  The Hon.
Craig J. Whitley presides over the case.  In the petition signed by
Russell Schmit, president and CEO, the Debtor estimated $10 million
to $50 million in both assets and liabilities.

The Debtor hired Hillary B. Crabtree, Esq., of Moore & Van Allen
PLLC, as counsel; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.


SECOND PHOENIX: Taps Atty. David Stich as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Second Phoenix Holding LLC received approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to hire
David Stich, Esq., as special counsel.

Mr. Stich will assist the company and its affiliates in the
refinancing or sale of their real property located at 212, 214 and
216 East 125th Street, New York; and at 14 2nd Avenue, New York.  

The attorney charges an hourly fee of $500.

Mr. Stich disclosed in a court filing that he neither holds nor
represents any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
creditors.

Mr. Stich maintains an office at:

     David P. Stich, Esq.
     521 Fifth Avenue, 17th Floor
     New York, NY 10175
     Phone: (212) 292-4453

                   About Second Phoenix Holding

Second Phoenix Holding LLC, Harlem Phoenix Realty Corp., and Kshel
Realty Corp. are privately held companies that are engaged in
activities related to real estate.  Second Phoenix is the fee
simple owner of a real property located at 212 East 125th Street,
New York, New York; 214-216 East 125th Street, New York, New York;
14 Second Avenue, New York, New York, with an appraised value of
$21.90 million. Harlem holds 47.58% of the equity of Second Phoenix
and Kshel holds the other 52.42%.  Evan Blum is the sole
shareholder of Harlem and Kshel and is the managing member of
Second Phoenix.

Based in New York, Second Phoenix Holding, along with its two
affiliates, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
18-10009 to 18-10011) on Jan. 3, 2018.  In the petition signed by
Evan Blum, sole managing member, Second Phoenix disclosed $21.92
million in total assets and $12.91 million in liabilities.  Marc
Stuart Goldberg, LLC, is the Debtors' counsel.


SEMLER SCIENTIFIC: CEO Murphy-Chutorian Has 12.4% Stake
-------------------------------------------------------
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D. disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that as of Jan. 1,
2018, he beneficially owns 834,150 shares of common stock of Semler
Scientific, Inc., constituting 12.4 percent based upon an aggregate
of 5,954,689 shares of the Issuer's common stock outstanding as of
May 1, 2018.

The Reporting Person's business address is 911 Bern Court, Suite
110, San Jose, CA 95112, and his present principal occupation is
serving as chief executive officer and a director of Semler
Scientific.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                       https://is.gd/4IRDl8

                     About Semler Scientific

Semler Scientific, Inc. -- http://www.semlercientific.com/-- is an
emerging growth company that provides technology solutions to
improve the clinical effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare
providers.  Semler Scientific's mission is to develop, manufacture
and market innovative proprietary products and services that assist
its customers in evaluating and treating chronic diseases.   The
company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Semler Scientific incurred a net loss of $1.51 million in 2017 and
a net loss of $2.55 million in 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Semler
Scientific had $4.25 million in total assets, $5.78 million in
total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.52
million.

The Company's independent registered public accountants' report for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 includes an explanatory paragraph that
expresses substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
"going concern."  BDO USA, LLP, in New York, stated that the
Company has negative working capital, a stockholders' deficit, and
recurring losses from operations that raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.


SEMLER SCIENTIFIC: William Chang Has 23.5% Stake as of April 20
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H.C. & Diana Shon Chang TTEE Chang Family Trust U/A/ DTD
10/23/2006 and William H.C. Chang disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission that as of April
20, 2018, they beneficially own 1,400,419 shares of common stock of
Semler Scientific, Inc., which represents 23.5 percent of the
shares outstanding.  The percentage is based upon an aggregate of
5,954,689 shares of the Issuer's common stock outstanding as of May
1, 2018 as reported in the Issuer's Annual Report on Form 10-Q
filed on May 3, 2018.

The statement was filed jointly by William H.C. Chang, a U.S.
citizen and the Chang Family Trust, a California living revocable
trust of which Mr. Chang is co-trustee with his spouse.  All of Mr.
Chang's securities are held in the Trust.  The Reporting Person's
business address is 520 El Camino Real, 9th Floor, San Mateo, CA
94402, and present principal occupation is serving as chief
executive officer of Westlake Development Company and chairman of
Westlake International Group.

On April 20, 2018, the Reporting Person acquired 71,925 shares of
the Issuer's common stock at $8.34 per share.  On Dec. 7, 2017 the
Reporting Person acquired 228,572 shares of the Issuer's common
stock at $1.75 per share upon the exercise of outstanding
warrants.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/snEe0d

                     About Semler Scientific

Semler Scientific, Inc. -- http://www.semlercientific.com/-- is an
emerging growth company that provides technology solutions to
improve the clinical effectiveness and efficiency of healthcare
providers.  Semler Scientific's mission is to develop, manufacture
and market innovative proprietary products and services that assist
its customers in evaluating and treating chronic diseases.
The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Semler Scientific incurred a net loss of $1.51 million in 2017 and
a net loss of $2.55 million in 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Semler
Scientific had $4.25 million in total assets, $5.78 million in
total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.52
million.

The Company's independent registered public accountants' report for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2017 includes an explanatory paragraph that
expresses substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
"going concern."  BDO USA, LLP, in New York, stated that the
Company has negative working capital, a stockholders' deficit, and
recurring losses from operations that raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.


SKY-SCAN INC: New Hampshire Objects to Plan Outline
---------------------------------------------------
The State of New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration
objects to the approval of the disclosure statement and plan filed
by Sky-Skan Incorporated.

NHDRA objects because the Disclosure Statement describes a plan
which on its face is unconfirmable because the treatment that it
provides for NHDRA's claim is not in accordance with the Bankruptcy
Code and is unacceptable to NHDRA.

The Debtor owes the NHDRA business taxes, interest and penalties in
the amount of $72,830.07. Of this amount $62,715.07 is a priority
claim pursuant to section 507(a)(8).  The treatment proposed in the
Debtor’s plan is to pay NHDRA's claim "in regular monthly
installment payments in cash equal to the allowed amount of such
claim over a period ending not later than five years after the
Effective Date."

The State of New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration is
represented by Anne M. Edwards, Esq., and Peter C.L. Roth, Esq.

                    About Sky-Skan Incorporated

Sky-Skan, Inc., was founded in 1967 as a company dedicated solely
to the development and manufacture of specialized devices for
depicting dynamic visualizations of astronomical and meteorological
phenomena on planetarium domes in museums, schools, and
universities. The company has since grown to become a provider of
digital full dome science visualization, theater control, and show
programming systems for hundreds of planetariums on six continents,
serving hundreds of clients in the niche field of immersive science
interpretation and education. From the initial planning stage to
staff training and ongoing support, Sky-Skan provides all services
required by the most advanced digital fulldome planetariums and
visualization theaters.

Sky-Skan, based in Nashua, NH, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.H. Case No. 17-11540) on Nov. 1, 2017.  Steven T. Savage,
president, signed the petition.  In its petition, the Debtor
estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  

Peter N. Tamposi, Esq., at The Tamposi Law Group, P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor tapped SquareTail Advisors, LLC, as
financial advisor.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors on December 1, 2017.  The committee hired
William S. Gannon PLLC as its bankruptcy counsel.


SOAR INTO YOUR DESTINY: Has Authority to Use Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael J. Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of New York authorized Soar Into Your Destiny,
Inc., to use, on an emergency basis, the cash collateral with
respect to the secured indebtedness of US Income Partners, LLC.

The Debtor is authorized to use cash collateral for the payment of
(a) insurance, (b) utilities, (c) repairs and maintenance, and (d)
payment of postpetition interest on Debtor's obligation to US
Income Partners.

US Income Partners is granted roll-over or replacement lien
granting security to the same extent, to the same relative
priority, and with respect to the same assets which served as
collateral for US Income Partners' indebtedness to the extent the
cash collateral is actually used, without the need of any further
recordation to perfect such liens or security interests.

The Debtor will provide US Income Partners, through counsel, copies
of all invoices for payments and copies of checks issued in payment
of the uses of cash collateral provided in the Interim Order.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order is available at

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb18-10659-34.pdf

                   About Soar Into Your Destiny

Soar Into Your Destiny, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 18-10659) on April
10, 2018.  In the petition signed by the Chairman of the Board,
Kale L. Mann, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of less
than $500,000.  Judge Michael J. Kaplan presides over the case.
Raymond C. Stilwell, Esq., at the Law Offices of Raymond C.
Stilwell, serves as the Debtor's counsel.


SPOKANE COIN: Seeks Conditional Approval of Plan Outline
--------------------------------------------------------
Spokane Coin Exchange, Inc., filed a motion asking the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington to
conditionally approve its disclosure statement in support of its
chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

The Debtor also asks the Court to set a hearing for the final
approval of Disclosure Statement and confirmation of the Plan of
Reorganization.

The Debtor's plan is a partial liquidation plan, providing for the
liquidation of a portion of the property of the Debtor, namely,
claims Debtor holds and Inventory of Art. It also gives the Debtor
the option to sell its business in the future, but only after
notice and hearing.

The Debtor projects full payment to all creditors if the Debtor
successfully defeats any allowable claim of Susan Babudro in Class
9. If the claim of Class 9 becomes an allowable claim of $496,000,
the Debtor projects a dividend to the unsecured claims of Class 9
and 10 at approximately 15.4%.

In addition to payment of net proceeds of sale from the Sale of
Inventory of Art, Class 10 unsecured creditors will be paid the sum
of $2,500 per month from the net profits of the Debtor’s business
until said class' allowed claims are paid in full.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/waeb18-00826-11-43.pdf

               About Spokane Coin Exchange

Spokane, Washington-based Spokane Coin Exchange, Inc. --
http://spokanecoinexchange.com/-- is a dealer of gold, silver,
platinum and palladium, both in coin or bullion form, including the
popular American Eagle and Canadian Maple Leaf series, Krugerrands
and Pandas, Johnson Matthey, Engelhard, Credit Suisse and Swiss
Credit Corp products.  Spokane Coin Exchange has been serving
collectors and investors of rare coins, currency, philatelics,
precious gemstones, works of art, and bullion products since 1973.

Spokane Coin Exchange, Inc., based in Spokane, WA, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 18-00826) on March 28,
2018.  In the petition signed by Steven Baldwin, president, the
Debtor disclosed $309,000 in assets and $1.93 million in
liabilities.  The Hon. Frederick P. Corbit presides over the case.
Dan O'Rourke, Esq., at Southwell & O'Rourke, P.S., serves as
bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor. 


STANDARD MEDIA: S&P Assigns Prelim. 'B' CCR, Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'B' preliminary corporate credit
ratings to Nashville, Tenn.-based Standard Media Holdings LLC and
its subsidiary Standard Media Group LLC. The rating outlook is
stable.

S&P said, "At the same time, we assigned our 'B+' preliminary
issue-level and '2' recovery ratings to the company's proposed $260
million senior secured first-lien credit facility, comprising a $15
million revolving credit facility and a $245 million first-lien
term loan. The '2' recovery rating indicates our expectation for
substantial (70%-90%; rounded estimate: 70%) recovery of principal
in the event of a payment default.

"We also assigned our 'CCC+' preliminary issue-level and '6'
recovery ratings to the company's proposed $90 million second-lien
term loan. The '6' recovery rating indicates our expectation for
negligible (0%-10%; rounded estimate: 0%) recovery of principal in
the event of a payment default."

Standard Media Group LLC is the borrower on the first- and
second-lien credit facilities.

S&P said, "Our preliminary corporate credit rating and outlook on
Standard Media Holdings LLC (Standard Media) reflects the company's
smaller size and scale than that of peers and its portfolio of No.
3- and No. 4-rated stations with a concentration of Fox
network-affiliated stations. This is somewhat offset by the growing
retransmission revenue and high retransmission revenue per
subscriber the company receives from multichannel video programming
distributors (MVPDs). The rating also reflects the company's lack
of track record as a stand-alone entity, financial sponsor
ownership, and high forecast average trailing-eight-quarters
leverage for 2018 and 2019 in the mid-5x area. Standard Media, a
newly formed entity, is acquiring stations that Sinclair is
divesting as part of its proposed acquisition of Tribune Media Co.
We have assigned preliminary ratings that we will finalize once
Standard Media closes on the acquisition, which is contingent on
Sinclair acquiring Tribune Media. At that time, we will review the
final terms of the executed credit agreement, and any material
change in terms could impact our final ratings on the company.

"The stable rating outlook reflects our expectation that Standard
Media will continue to increase its net retransmission revenue over
the next 12-18 months, generate about $25 million-$30 million of
discretionary cash flow per year, and maintain average
trailing–eight-quarters leverage in the high-5x area.

"We could lower the rating if the company experiences unexpected
costs or difficulty operating the acquired stations on a
stand-alone basis or if we believe that the company cannot increase
retransmission revenue per subscriber in future retransmission
contract renewals with MVPDs, and leverage increases to the mid-6x
area and discretionary cash flow to debt declines below 5%. We
could also lower the rating if Standard Media funds future
acquisitions with debt, resulting in leverage increasing to the
mid-6x area and discretionary cash flow to debt declining below
5%.

"We could raise the rating if the company meaningfully increases
its size and scale with acquisitions of No. 1- or No. 2-rated
stations and diversifies its major network affiliations. We would
expect this would help increase Standard Media's share of
advertising spending in its markets, help the company maintain high
retransmission revenue growth, and decrease its exposure to the Fox
network. Additionally, we could raise the rating if the company
commits to a financial policy under which debt to average
trailing-eight-quarters EBITDA improves to the mid-4x area on a
sustained basis. This could result, in our view, from
better-than-expected EBITDA growth coupled with debt repayment."


STONE CONNECTION: Unsecureds to Recoup 35% Paid in 14 Installments
------------------------------------------------------------------
Stone Connection, Inc., submits a disclosure statement with regard
to its chapter 11 plan dated May 29, 2018.

General Unsecured Claims is scheduled in the approximate amount of
$5,734,9391. Of this total, approximately $3,000,000 is owed to
affiliated companies M+Q North America, Inc., M+Q Granite AG, M+Q
Spain, M+Q Italy, Minaco do Brasil, Virginia Black Granite, Inc.,
Finstone, and Finstone Information Technologies AG, and M+Q (India)
Pvt. Ltd. (the "Group Creditors").

The Holders of General Unsecured Claim in Class 2B will receive
Distributions totaling 35% of each Holder's Allowed Class 2B Claim,
payable in 14 equal quarterly installments beginning on that date
that is 60 days after the Effective Date and continuing every three
months thereafter until each Holder receives their Class 2B
Dividend. Each quarterly installment will be equal to 2% of each
Holder's Allowed Class 2B Claim. Upon the occurrence of a Sale
Event, the Holders of Class 2B Claims will receive from the
Distribution Fund the lesser of 20% of the Class 2B Dividend or the
unpaid balance of the Class 2B Dividend. In the event there are
installments due after the Class 2A Distribution, such installments
will continue until the Class 2B Dividend is paid in full. The
Class 2B Dividend will be secured by a security interest in the
Debtor's inventory. For Distribution purposes, the Group Creditors
will not receive Distributions until all Non-Group Creditors
receive their Class 2B Dividend.

Upon the Confirmation Order becoming a Final Order, the Debtor will
assume the block trading operation of M+Q and will acquire M+Q's
block inventory valued at $1,589,426, payable in 36 equal monthly
installment beginning on the day that is 12 months after the Final
Order Date and continuing on the same day of each month thereafter
until paid in full, without interest. The assumption of the M+Q
operations is designed to diversify inventory, increase revenues,
and streamline the administrative expense associated with operating
the Debtor and M+Q as separate entities. Funds for payments will be
from (i) operations of the business as restructured following the
assumption of the M+Q block trading operation, (ii) DIP Credit
Extensions, and (iii) proceeds from a Sale Event.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/ganb18-51440-64.pdf

                    About Stone Connection

Founded in 1999, Stone Connection, Inc. --
https://www.stoneconnectionatlanta.com/ -- is a direct importer of
marble and granite for homeowners and contractors in the Atlanta
metro area, including the communities of Roswell, Alpharetta, Sandy
Springs, and more. Its 30,000 sq/ft warehouse and showroom in
Norcross, Georgia have more than 300 individual types and colors of
granite.
                      
Stone Connection filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case
No. 18-51440) on Jan. 30, 2018.  In the petition signed by CEO
Eugene Steyn, the Debtor estimated assets and liabilities at $1
million to $10 million.  The case is assigned to Judge Barbara
Ellis-Monro.  The Debtor is represented by Frank G. Nason, IV,
Esq., at Lamberth, Cifelli, Ellis & Nason, P.A.


TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE: Fitch Cuts LT Issuer Default Rating to BB-
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded the long-term Issuer Default Ratings
(IDRs) of Tenneco Inc. (TEN) and its Tenneco Automotive Operating
Company Inc. (TAOC) subsidiary to 'BB-' from 'BB+' and removed the
ratings from Rating Watch Negative. In addition, Fitch has
downgraded TEN's secured revolving credit facility rating and
TAOC's secured term loan A rating to 'BB+'/'RR1' from 'BBB-'/'RR1'.
Fitch has downgraded TEN's senior unsecured notes rating to
'BB-'/'RR4' from 'BB+'/'RR4'.

In addition to the rating actions noted above, Fitch has assigned
ratings of 'BB+'/'RR1' to TEN's new $1.5 billion secured revolving
credit facility, TAOC's new $1.6 billion secured term loan A and
TAOC's new $1.8 billion secured term loan B.

Fitch has assigned a Rating Outlook of Stable to TEN and TAOC.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The downgrade of the ratings of TEN and TAOC is driven by the
substantial increase in the company's leverage that will result
from TEN's acquisition of Federal-Mogul LLC (FM). TEN will fund the
acquisition with a combination of cash, incremental borrowing and
stock. Fitch estimates the combined company will have roughly $6.5
billion in debt at closing, including incremental debt to fund part
of the transaction, existing debt at both TEN and FM that will
likely remain in place following the acquisition, as well as
off-balance sheet factoring at both companies that Fitch treats as
debt. Including certain transaction synergies, Fitch estimates that
the combined company's EBITDA will be around $1.8 billion about a
year after the transaction closes, leading to estimated gross
EBITDA leverage in the mid-3x range, well above TEN's standalone
leverage of 2.3x at March 31, 2018 and consistent with a long-term
IDR of 'BB-'.

To fund the cash portion of the transaction, TEN plans to enter
into a new five-year secured credit facility that will consist of a
$1.5 billion revolver and a $1.6 billion term loan A. In addition,
the company also plans to borrow $1.8 billion on a secured term
loan B. Both the credit facility and the term loan B will be
guaranteed by TEN, TAOC and TEN's current and future wholly-owned
domestic subsidiaries. The credit facility and the term loan B will
also be secured by the assets of those same subsidiaries. Fitch
expects the credit facility and the term loan B to replace TEN's
existing revolver, TAOC's existing term loan A and FM's existing
revolver and term loan, with remaining proceeds used to help fund
the $800 million cash component of the acquisition.

Fitch believes the FM acquisition will significantly enhance the
diversity of TEN's business. Fitch also expects the combination of
both companies' product lines will create cross-selling
opportunities and provide TEN with the ability to offer more
comprehensive end-to-end solutions in the powertrain business,
where the acquisition will allow the company to more closely
integrate the development of powertrain and emissions systems. Both
companies' aftermarket businesses will also benefit from increased
scale and the ability to leverage a larger distribution network.
Although demand for the company's clean air and powertrain products
could come under pressure over the longer term as the global auto
industry focuses more on battery electric vehicles, Fitch expects
tightening global regulations on emissions from internal combustion
engines, including hybrids, will drive higher demand for TEN's
powertrain and emissions technologies over the nearer term. At the
same time, growing demand for increasingly sophisticated ride
control systems will also benefit the company. Fitch expects demand
for sophisticated ride control technologies will increase when auto
manufacturers begin marketing fully automated vehicles for
passenger use.

TEN estimates that various cost synergies will result in at least
$200 million in run-rate profit improvement. Notably, the company
has not included any revenue synergies in its target, although
Fitch believes there will be opportunities to achieve synergistic
revenue benefits in addition to the cost synergies. TEN also
believes it can achieve $250 million in one-time cash working
capital synergies by applying its best practices in working capital
management to FM's working capital.

TEN plans to close on the acquisition during the second half of
2018. Roughly a year later, in the second half of 2019, TEN plans
to split into two businesses, one that will combine TEN's Clean Air
business and FM's Powertrain operations, and another that will
combine TEN's Ride Performance and aftermarket business with FM's
Motorparts business. This will most likely be accomplished by
spinning off the Aftermarket and Ride Performance business from
what will become TEN's Powertrain Technology business.

Although the transaction will significantly grow and diversify
TEN's business, there are important risks associated with it as
well. Merging both companies' sizable operations will be
challenging and could lead to higher-than-expected integration
costs. There could also be delays in the attainment of the expected
synergies or synergies may not provide the expected benefits. More
important is the sizable increase in TEN's medium-term leverage
that will result from the transaction, which could pose a
significant risk, given the inherent cyclicality of the global auto
industry. A decline in auto production, particularly in North
America, could limit TEN's ability to de-lever its balance sheet as
quickly as planned. Although Fitch believes TEN has the ability to
mitigate each of these issues, they nonetheless increase the
intermediate-term risk to the company's operating and credit
profiles.

TEN has preliminarily noted that it expects the Powertrain
Technology business will have net leverage of about 2.3x at
separation, with a longer-term leverage goal of maintaining net
leverage in the 1.0x to 1.5x range. The company expects the
Aftermarket and Ride Performance business to have net leverage of
around 3.0x at separation, with a longer term net leverage target
in the 1.5x to 2.0x range. (TEN's leverage targets do not
incorporate off-balance sheet factoring, which Fitch treats as
debt.) The Aftermarket and Ride Performance business will likely
enter into new financing arrangements around the time it is spun
off and will use the proceeds to fund a dividend to the Powertrain
Technologies business. The Powertrain Systems business will likely
retain the pre-separation capital structure, including TEN's senior
unsecured notes, but it will use proceeds from the Aftermarket and
Ride Performance dividend to refinance some or all of FM's secured
notes.

Although TEN has disclosed some of its current plans for the
company post-separation, significant aspects of the spinoff
transaction, including details on the final capital structures of
both businesses, are still being developed. Fitch will assess the
effect of the spinoff on TEN's ratings when more concrete details
surrounding the capital structures of both businesses have been
established.

TEN will acquire FM from Icahn Enterprises L.P. through a cash and
stock transaction comprised of $800 million in cash plus Class A
common shares and Class B non-voting shares, which will make Icahn
a substantial TEN shareholder. The enterprise value for the
acquisition equates to approximately $5.4 billion or about 7.2x
FM's estimated 2017 adjusted EBITDA. Including synergies, the
transaction multiple would be about 5.4x.

Separate from the acquisition, in 2014, antitrust authorities in
various jurisdictions began investigating possible violations of
antitrust laws by multiple automotive parts suppliers, including
TEN. However, the European Commission's (EC) closing of the case
without penalty in April 2017 and the U.S. Department of Justice's
(DOJ) previous grant of conditional leniency through the Antitrust
Division's Corporate Leniency Policy are encouraging. The DOJ's
leniency policy limits TEN's exposure; in exchange for the
company's self-reporting and continuing cooperation with the DOJ's
investigation, the DOJ will not bring any criminal antitrust
prosecution nor seek any criminal fines or penalties against TEN.

TEN and certain of its competitors are also currently defendants in
civil putative class action litigation in the U.S. and Canada
related to the antitrust investigations. However, because TEN
received conditional leniency from the DOJ, its civil liability in
the U.S. follow-on actions is limited to single damages, and it
will not be jointly and severally liable with the other defendants.
TEN established a $132 million reserve in 2017 for settlement costs
that it expected to be necessary to resolve its antitrust matters
globally, which primarily involves the resolution of civil suits
and related claims. Through April 2018, TEN had paid $62 million to
resolve various claims related to the investigation.

Fitch has assigned a Recovery Rating of 'RR1' to the current and
proposed secured debt of TEN and TAOC and rated the secured debt
two notches above the long-term IDRs, reflecting their substantial
collateral coverage. Fitch has assigned a Recovery Rating of 'RR4'
to TEN's senior unsecured notes, reflecting Fitch's expectations
for an average recovery in a distressed scenario. The 'RR4'
recovery rating considers the potential for a reduction in the
relative amount of secured debt in the company's capital structure
post-separation.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Following its planned acquisition of FM, TEN will have a relatively
strong competitive position focusing on powertrain, clean air and
ride control technologies for automotive, commercial vehicle and
off-road machinery original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), as well
as a large presence in branded automotive aftermarket parts and
components. The company's Tier 1 technologies are likely to grow in
demand over the longer term as its OEM customers increasingly focus
on ways to improve powertrain fuel efficiency, reduce emissions and
improve vehicle ride quality. At the same time, its aftermarket
business will insulate it somewhat from the heavier cyclicality of
the Tier 1 business, while providing growth opportunities as the
on-road vehicle fleet ages in developing markets.

Although the company's clean air and powertrain businesses could
come under pressure over the longer term as the global auto
industry focuses on vehicle electrification, in the nearer term,
tightening global regulations on emissions from internal combustion
engines, including hybrids, will lead to higher demand for TEN's
products. At the same time, growing demand for increasingly
sophisticated ride control systems will also benefit the company.
That being said, compared with certain high-technology auto
suppliers, such as Aptiv PLC (BBB/Stable) or Visteon Corporation,
which are increasingly focused on in-car advanced technologies,
TEN's focus remains on more traditional products that are directly
tied to vehicle performance characteristics.

Following the acquisition, Fitch expects TEN's margins to remain
generally in-line with issuers in the high-'BB' range. From a size
perspective, the post-acquisition company will be among the largest
U.S. auto suppliers, but it will still be smaller than the largest
global auto suppliers, such as Continental AG (BBB+/Stable), Magna
International Inc. or Robert Bosch GmbH (F2). However, Fitch
expects TEN's post-acquisition credit protection metrics, including
the effect of planned synergies, to be more in-line with issuers in
the low-'BB' range, such as American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings,
Inc. (BB-/Stable).

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's Key Assumptions Within the Rating Case for the Issuer

  --TEN's acquisition of FM closes in the second half of 2018 as
planned;

  --U.S. industry light vehicle sales decline to about 16.8 million
units in 2018 and plateau in the 16.5 million to 17 million range
for the next several years, while global industry sales rise in the
low-single digit range;

  --Expense and working capital synergies are achieved according to
the company's plans;

  --Capital spending runs at about 4.0% to 4.5% of revenue through
the forecast, reflecting the company's ongoing investments to
support new product programs and geographical growth;

  --Post-acquisition, TEN has about $1 billion in off-balance sheet
factoring outstanding;

  --Following the acquisition, TEN continues to pay regular
dividends, but it pulls back on most share-repurchase activity;

  --The company uses excess cash to prepay amounts under its term
loans as it works to meet its leverage targets.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

  --An increase in TEN's value-added FCF margin to about 3% on a
consistent basis;

  --A sustained decline in post-acquisition EBITDA leverage to 3.0x
or lower;

  --A sustained decline in post-acquisition FFO-adjusted leverage
to 3.5x or lower;

  --A sustained increase in post-acquisition FFO fixed-charge
coverage to 3.5x or higher;

  --The acquisition is not completed, in which case the ratings
could revert to the pre-downgrade levels.

Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

  --A severe decline in global vehicle production that leads to
reduced demand for TEN's products;

  --A sustained decline in the post-acquisition value-added FCF
margin to breakeven or below;

  --An inability to reduce post-acquisition EBITDA leverage to
below 4.0x over the intermediate term;

  --An inability to reduce post-acquisition FFO-adjusted leverage
to below 4.5x over the intermediate term;

  --An inability to maintain post-acquisition FFO fixed-charge
coverage above 3.0x;

  --An adverse outcome from the ongoing antitrust investigation
that leads to a significant decline in liquidity or an increase in
leverage.

LIQUIDITY

Solid Liquidity: Fitch expects TEN's liquidity to remain solid. As
of March 31, 2018, TEN had $288 million of unrestricted cash and
cash equivalents, although Fitch expects the company will likely
carry a higher cash balance following the acquisition.
Post-acquisition, TEN will maintain additional liquidity through a
$1.5 billion secured revolving credit facility, which will be
downsized slightly from the company's current $1.6 billion
facility. TEN had $1.3 billion in availability on its current
facility at March 31, 2018 after accounting for $311 million in
outstanding borrowings.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Tenneco Inc. (TEN)

  - Long-term IDR downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB+';

  - Existing secured revolving credit facility downgraded to
'BB+'/'RR1' from 'BBB-'/'RR1';

  - New $1.5 billion 5-year secured revolving credit facility
assigned 'BB+'/'RR1';

  - Senior unsecured notes downgraded to 'BB-'/'RR4' from
'BB+'/'RR4'.

Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc. (TAOC)

  - Long-term IDR downgraded to 'BB-' from 'BB+';

  - Existing secured term loan A downgraded to 'BB+'/'RR1' from
'BBB-'/'RR1';

  - New $1.6 billion 5-year secured term loan A assigned
'BB+'/'RR1';

  - New $1.8 billion 7-year secured term loan B assigned
'BB+'/'RR1'.

The ratings for TEN and TAOC have been removed from Rating Watch
Negative, and Fitch has assigned a Stable Rating Outlook for TEN
and TAOC.


TIAN RECLAMATION: Taps Nichols Equipment as Appraiser
-----------------------------------------------------
Tian Reclamation & Contracting, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of West Virginia to hire
an appraiser.

The Debtor proposes to employ Nichols Equipment Inc. to conduct an
appraisal of its equipment for a flat fee of $8,381.

Nichols Equipment does not hold any interest adverse to the Debtor
and its estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Art Nichols
     Nichols Equipment Inc.
     2192 Highway 52
     P.O. Box 516
     Moncks Corner, SC 29461
     Tel: 843-761-6750
     Fax: 843-899-3873
     E-mail: art@nicholsequipmentinc.com

               About Tian Reclamation & Contracting

Based on Gauley Bridge, West Virginia, Tian Reclamation &
Contracting, Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D.W.V. Case No. 15-20602) on Nov. 23, 2015.  In the
petition signed by Timothy Hannigan, president, the Debtor listed
its total assets at $2.97 million and total liabilities at $3.23
million.  Pierson Legal Services is the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.


TINTRI INC: Insight Venture Entities Cease to be Shareholders
-------------------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Insight Venture Partners VIII, L.P., Insight Venture
Associates VIII, Ltd., Insight Holdings Group, LLC, Star Trinity,
LP, Star Trinity GP, LLC, Insight Venture Management, LLC, Insight
Venture Partners (Cayman) VIII, L.P., Insight Venture Partners
(Delaware) VIII, L.P., Insight Venture Partners VIII
(Co-Investors), L.P., Insight Venture Associates VIII, L.P.,
disclosed that as of May 9, 2018, they have ceased to beneficially
own shares of common stock of Tintri, Inc.

This amendment is the final amendment to the Schedule 13D and an
exit filing for the reporting persons.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/t8AorD

                          About Tintri

Founded in 2008 and headquartered in Mountain View, California,
Tintri, Inc. develops and markets an enterprise cloud platform
combining cloud management software technology and a range of
all-flash and hybrid storage systems, for virtualized and cloud
environments.  Its website address is www.tintri.com.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm KPMG LLP,
the Company's auditor since 2014, on the Company's consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Jan. 31, 2018, contains an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has incurred
negative cash flows from operations, is required to maintain
compliance with certain financial covenants and, regardless of the
financial covenants, the Company likely does not have sufficient
cash to meet its obligations associated with its operating
activities beyond June 30, 2018.  Together, these factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

Tintri incurred net losses of $157.7 million for the year ended
Jan. 31, 2018, $105.80 million for the year ended Jan. 31, 2017,
and $100.96 million for the year ended Jan. 31, 2016.  As of Jan.
31, 2018, Tintri had $76.24 million in total assets, $168.0 million
in total liabilities, and a total stockholders' deficit of $91.71.


TOYS R US: Court Approves Assignment of Lease to Raymours
---------------------------------------------------------
NTH 250 E LLC owns premises located at 250 East Route 4, Paramus,
New Jersey, which it leases to Debtors Toys "R" Us, Inc., and
affiliates pursuant to a lease executed on Sept. 19, 1972 between
the predecessors in interest of TRU and NTH. On March 23, 2018, the
Court entered the Order Establishing Bidding Procedures and
Granting Related Relief, approving the Debtors' sale, and
assumption and assignment, of certain real property and unexpired
leases and auction and bidding procedures for soliciting and
selecting the best offers for those assets. The Lease was one of
the assets included in the Bidding Procedures Order. TRU, in
connection with the Bidding Procedures Order, is seeking final
approval of the assumption and assignment of the Lease to Raymours
Furniture Company, Inc. NTH has objected to the proposed
assignment, asserting that the transaction is impermissible because
the Debtors cannot assign the Lease free and clear of the use
restriction contained therein.

After carefully considering the evidence and submissions of the
parties, Bankruptcy Judge Keith L. Phillips overruled NTH's
objection.

NTH has objected to the proposed assignment, asserting that the
transaction is impermissible because the Use Restriction cannot be
voided. The Debtors argue that section 365(f) of the Bankruptcy
Code, 11 U.S.C. section 365(f), allows them to assign the Lease
free and clear of the Use Restriction.

The facts and circumstances of this case compel the Court to find
that the Use Restriction will unduly hamper the Debtors' ability to
assign the Lease and prevent the full realization of the value of
the Debtors' assets. When balancing the interests of the Debtors
against those of NTH, it is evident that the interest of the
Debtors in obtaining the full value of the below-market Lease
outweighs the detriment to NTH. In this case, NTH has failed to
provide any clear evidence of harm beyond its inability to acquire
an undervalued lease at the expense of the Debtors. The $1,300,000
offered by Raymours represents maximum value to the bankruptcy
estates.

The evidence before the Court is that Raymours would not have bid
on the Lease had it thought that the Use Restriction would be
retained. The effect of the Raymours auction participation was to
increase the price of the Lease to $1,300,000, which was a
substantial increase over NTH's initial $500,000 bid. The parties
do not contest that after multiple rounds of bidding between
Raymours and NTH, NTH withdrew, leaving Raymours the successful
bidder. This undoubtedly led to a maximization of the value to be
received by the bankruptcy estates. Despite the assertion by NTH
that the difference between its highest bid and Raymours' winning
bid was only $50,000, had Raymours not continued bidding on the
Lease, the purchase price undoubtedly would have been substantially
lower than the eventual $1,300,000 winning bid. To find that
Raymour's bid would add only $50,000 to the bankruptcy estates
would discount the value of Raymour’s contribution to the bidding
process and may have a chilling effect on future competitive
bidding.

The Court also finds that NTH has not proven any definitive harm it
will suffer if the Use Restriction is invalidated pursuant to
section 365(f). The Debtors and Raymours point out that NTH does
not own any other properties near the Premises since each of the
other nearby properties is owned by a separate limited liability
company in the Hegeman Entities. Therefore, they argue, any
possible damage from enforcement of the Use Restriction would be to
those separate companies and not to NTH. However, even if the Court
disregards those corporate identities and treats all of the
separate Hegeman Entities as one entity, the Court finds that NTH
has failed to establish the "actual and substantial detriment"
required by U.L. Radio Corp.

The Court finds that the possibility of harm to NTH resulting from
the assignment free and clear of the Use Restriction is outweighed
by the benefit of the sale to the Debtors' bankruptcy estates.
Therefore, the Court will approve the assignment of the Lease to
Raymours free and clear of the Use Restriction pursuant to section
365(f), and NTH's objection to the proposed assumption and
assignment of the Lease is overruled.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated May 31,
2018 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb17-34665-3305.pdf

                    About Toys R Us, Inc.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., was an American toy and juvenile-products
retailer founded in 1948 and headquartered in Wayne, New Jersey, in
the New York City metropolitan area.  Merchandise was sold in 880
Toys "R" Us and Babies "R" Us stores in the United States, Puerto
Rico and Guam, and in more than 780 international stores and more
than 245 licensed stores in 37 countries and jurisdictions.
Merchandise was also sold at e-commerce sites including Toysrus.com
and Babiesrus.com.

On July 21, 2005, a consortium of Bain Capital Partners LLC,
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, and Vornado Realty Trust invested $1.3
billion to complete a $6.6 billion leveraged buyout of the
company.

Toys "R" Us is a privately owned entity but still files with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as required by its debt
agreements.

The Company's consolidated balance sheet showed $6.572 billion in
assets, $7.891 billion in liabilities, and a stockholders' deficit
of $1.319 billion as of April 29, 2017.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries and its
Canadian subsidiary voluntarily filed for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. Case No.
17-34665) on Sept. 19, 2017.  In addition, the Company's Canadian
subsidiary voluntarily commenced parallel proceedings under the
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") in Canada in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.  The Company's operations
outside of the U.S. and Canada, including its 255 licensed stores
and joint venture partnership in Asia, which are separate entities,
were not part of the Chapter 11 filing and CCAA proceedings.

Grant Thornton is the monitor appointed in the CCAA case.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Chapter 11 cases.

In the Chapter 11 cases, Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP serve as the Debtors' legal counsel.  Kutak Rock
LLP serves as co-counsel.  Toys "R" Us employed Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as its restructuring advisor; and Lazard Freres
& Co. LLC as its investment banker.  It hired Prime Clerk LLC as
claims and noticing agent.  Consensus Advisory Services LLC and
Consensus Securities LLC, serve as sale process investment banker.
A&G Realty Partners, LLC, serves as its real estate advisor.

On Sept. 26, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its legal counsel; Wolcott
Rivers, P.C. as local counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial
advisor; and Moelis & Company LLC as investment banker.

                        Toys "R" Us UK

Toys "R" Us Limited, Toys "R" Us, Inc.'s UK arm with 105 stores and
3,000 employees, was sent into administration in the United Kingdom
in February 2018.

Arron Kendall and Simon Thomas of Moorfields Advisory Limited, 88
Wood Street, London, EC2V 7QF were appointed Joint Administrators
on Feb. 28, 2018. The Administrators now manage the affairs,
business and property of the Company.  The Administrators act as
agents only and without personal liability.

The Administrators said they will make every effort to secure a
buyer for all or part of the business.

                   Liquidation of U.S. Stores

Toys "R" Us, Inc., on March 15, 2018, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking Bankruptcy Court approval to
start the process of conducting an orderly wind-down of its U.S.
business and liquidation of inventory in all 735 of the Company's
U.S. stores, including stores in Puerto Rico.

                         Propco I Debtors

Toys "R" Us Property Company I, LLC and its subsidiaries own fee
and leasehold interests in more than 300 properties in the United
States.  The Debtors lease the properties on a triple-net basis
under a master lease to Toys-Delaware, the operating entity for all
of TRU's North American businesses, which operates the majority of
the properties as Toys "R" Us stores, Babies "R" Us stores or
side-by-side stores, or subleases them to alternative retailers.

Toys "R" Us Property was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in
Wayne, New Jersey.  Toys 'R' Us Property operates as a subsidiary
of Toys "R" Us Inc.

Company LLC, MAP Real Estate LLC, TRU 2005 RE I LLC, TRU 2005 RE II
Trust, and Wayne Real Estate Company LLC (collectively, "Propco I
Debtors") sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case  No. 18-31429) on March 20, 2018.  The
Propco I Debtors sought and obtained procedural consolidation and
joint administration of their Chapter 11 cases, separate from the
Toys "R" Us Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

The Propco I Debtors estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion
and liabilities of $500 million to $1 billion.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Propco I Debtors' cases.

The Propco I Debtors hired Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg, LLP;
and Crowley, Liberatore, Ryan & Brogan, P.C., as co-counsel.  The
Debtors also tapped Kutak Rock LLP.  They hired Goldin Associates,
LLC, as financial advisors.


TOYS R US: Ombudsman Taps Hirschler Fleischer as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Elise Frejka, Esq., the consumer privacy ombudsman appointed in the
Chapter 11 case of Toys "R" Us, Inc., seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to hire
Hirschler Fleischer, P.C., as her legal counsel.

The firm will advise Ms. Frejka regarding her duties as consumer
privacy ombudsman and will provide other legal services related to
the Chapter 11 cases of Toys "R" Us and its affiliates.

Robert Westermann, Esq., and Franklin Cragle, Esq., the attorneys
who will be providing the services, charge $535 per hour and $385
per hour, respectively.

Mr. Westermann, a shareholder of Hirschler, disclosed in a court
filing that his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Robert S. Westermann, Esq.
     Hirschler Fleischer, P.C.
     The Edgeworth Building
     2100 East Cary Street
     P.O. Box 500
     Richmond, VA 23218-0500
     Telephone: 804.771.9500
     Facsimile: 804.644.0957
     E-mail: rwestermann@hf-law.com

                       About Toys R Us, Inc.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., was an American toy and juvenile-products
retailer founded in 1948 and headquartered in Wayne, New Jersey, in
the New York City metropolitan area.  Merchandise was sold in 880
Toys "R" Us and Babies "R" Us stores in the United States, Puerto
Rico and Guam, and in more than 780 international stores and more
than 245 licensed stores in 37 countries and jurisdictions.
Merchandise was also sold at e-commerce sites including Toysrus.com
and Babiesrus.com.

On July 21, 2005, a consortium of Bain Capital Partners LLC,
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts, and Vornado Realty Trust invested $1.3
billion to complete a $6.6 billion leveraged buyout of the
company.

Toys "R" Us is a privately owned entity but still files with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as required by its debt
agreements.

The Company's consolidated balance sheet showed $6.572 billion in
assets, $7.891 billion in liabilities, and a stockholders' deficit
of $1.319 billion as of April 29, 2017.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries and its
Canadian subsidiary voluntarily filed for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. Case No.
17-34665) on Sept. 19, 2017.  In addition, the Company's Canadian
subsidiary voluntarily commenced parallel proceedings under the
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") in Canada in the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.  The Company's operations
outside of the U.S. and Canada, including its 255 licensed stores
and joint venture partnership in Asia, which are separate entities,
were not part of the Chapter 11 filing and CCAA proceedings.

Grant Thornton is the monitor appointed in the CCAA case.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Chapter 11 cases.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis as
their legal counsel; Kutak Rock LLP as co-counsel; Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as restructuring advisor; Lazard Freres & Co.
LLC as investment banker; Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing
agent; Consensus Advisory Services LLC and Consensus Securities LLC
as sale process investment banker; and A&G Realty Partners, LLC as
real estate advisor.

On Sept. 26, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP as its legal counsel; Wolcott
Rivers, P.C. as local counsel; FTI Consulting, Inc. as financial
advisor; and Moelis & Company LLC as investment banker.

On May 29, 2018, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed Elise S.
Frejka, Esq., as the consumer privacy ombudsman.

                        Toys "R" Us UK

Toys "R" Us Limited, Toys "R" Us, Inc.'s UK arm with 105 stores and
3,000 employees, was sent into administration in the United Kingdom
in February 2018.

Arron Kendall and Simon Thomas of Moorfields Advisory Limited, 88
Wood Street, London, EC2V 7QF were appointed Joint Administrators
on Feb. 28, 2018.  The Administrators now manage the affairs,
business and property of the Company.  The Administrators act as
agents only and without personal liability.

The Administrators said they will make every effort to secure a
buyer for all or part of the business.

                   Liquidation of U.S. Stores

Toys "R" Us, Inc., on March 15, 2018, filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a motion seeking Bankruptcy Court approval to
start the process of conducting an orderly wind-down of its U.S.
business and liquidation of inventory in all 735 of the Company's
U.S. stores, including stores in Puerto Rico.

                         Propco I Debtors

Toys "R" Us Property Company I, LLC and its subsidiaries own fee
and leasehold interests in more than 300 properties in the United
States.  The Debtors lease the properties on a triple-net basis
under a master lease to Toys-Delaware, the operating entity for all
of TRU's North American businesses, which operates the majority of
the properties as Toys "R" Us stores, Babies "R" Us stores or
side-by-side stores, or subleases them to alternative retailers.

Toys "R" Us Property was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in
Wayne, New Jersey.  Toys 'R' Us Property operates as a subsidiary
of Toys "R" Us Inc.

Company LLC, MAP Real Estate LLC, TRU 2005 RE I LLC, TRU 2005 RE II
Trust, and Wayne Real Estate Company LLC (collectively, "Propco I
Debtors") sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. 18-31429) on March 20, 2018.  The
Propco I Debtors sought and obtained procedural consolidation and
joint administration of their Chapter 11 cases, separate from the
Toys "R" Us Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

The Propco I Debtors estimated assets of $500 million to $1 billion
and liabilities of $500 million to $1 billion.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Propco I Debtors' cases.

The Propco I Debtors hired Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg, LLP;
and Crowley, Liberatore, Ryan & Brogan, P.C., as co-counsel.  The
Debtors also tapped Kutak Rock LLP.  They hired Goldin Associates,
LLC, as financial advisors.


TRAILER VAN: New Plan Discloses Settlement Agreement with J. Torres
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Trailer Van Corp. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Puerto Rico an amended disclosure statement, dated June
1, 2018, referring to its plan of reorganization, which provides
the quickest recovery and will maximize the return to creditors on
their claims.

Class 3 under the latest plan is comprised of the allowable
Unsecured Credit of Ms. Jacqueline Pietri Torres. An adversary
proceeding was filed against said creditor and a settlement was
reached and filed with the Court on May 31, 2018. The total amount
owed under this class amounts to $349,966.33. Under the agreement,
two land properties, which are assets of debtor's estate, are to be
transferred to the creditor in full payment of its credit.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor owned assets and had
liabilities, as more particularly described in its Schedules and
Statement of Financial Affairs, which Debtor filed with the
Bankruptcy Court.

The previous version of the plan provided that the Debtor will
effect payment of allowed claims, with the available funds
originating from the Debtor's operations and the collection of the
Debtor's accounts receivable.  In addition, the Debtor will sell,
during the life of the Plan, real property in order to comply with
the payments required under the Plan.

A full-text copy of the Amended Disclosure Statement is available
at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/prb16-07655-11-89.pdf

                      About Trailer Van Corp.

Headquartered in Carolina, Puerto Rico, Trailer Van Corp. filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-07655)
on Sept. 27, 2016, estimating its assets at up to $50,000 and its
liabilities at between $100,001 and $500,000.  Fausto David Godreau
Zayas, Esq., at Godreau & Gonzalez Law serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

In June 1979, Frank Sanfilippo Sr. and his partner Peter Uscinowicz
founded Trailer Van Corp., under the concept of bringing into the
Island of Puerto Rico a mean of storage and mobile office trailer.


TRIBUNE COMPANY: J. Cazoneri's Bid to Reopen Appeals Nixed
----------------------------------------------------------
In the bankruptcy case captioned In re: TRIBUNE COMPANY, et al.,
Chapter 11 (Jointly Administered), Debtors, Br. No. 08-13141
(KJC)(Bankr. D. Del.), District Judge Gregory M. Sleet denied
Appellant Jo Anna Cazoneri McCormick's request to open, reopen and
reverse, construed as a motion for reconsideration and motion for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

On July 31, 2014, the appellant filed notice of appeal in
Bankruptcy Case No. 08-13141, along with a motion to proceed in
forma pauperis. On August 7, 2014, McCormick was ordered to pay the
filing fee or to submit a long form in forma pauperis application
within twenty-one days or the case would be dismissed without
prejudice. McCormick did not comply with the order and the case was
closed on Dec. 10, 2014. Notice that the case had been closed was
mailed to McCormick at the address she provided the court. The
mailing was returned as "return to sender insufficient address
unable to forward." More than three years later, McCormick seeks to
reopen the case. The filing is construed as a motion for
reconsideration.

The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to "correct manifest
errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence." "A
proper Rule 59(e) motion . . . must rely on one of three grounds:
an intervening change in controlling law; the availability of new
evidence; or the need to correct a clear error of law or fact or to
prevent manifest injustice."

McCormick has failed to demonstrate any of the aforementioned
grounds to warrant a reconsideration of the Dec. 10, 2014 dismissal
of the appeal. Notably, McCormick did not keep the court apprised
of her current address and, thus, failed to prosecute her appeal.
Moreover, the motion for reconsideration is untimely having been
filed more than three years after the appeal was closed.

A copy of the Court's Memorandum Order dated May 8, 2018 is
available at https://bit.ly/2HtFOQX from Leagle.com.

Jo Anna Cazoneri McCormick, Appellant, pro se.

                       About Tribune Co.

Chicago, Illinois-based Tribune Co. -- http://www.tribune.com/--
and 110 of its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 protection (Bankr.
D. Del. Lead Case No. 08-13141) on Dec. 8, 2008.  The Debtors
proposed Sidley Austin LLP as their counsel; Cole, Schotz, Meisel,
Forman & Leonard, PA, as Delaware counsel; Lazard Ltd. and Alvarez
& Marsal North America LLC as financial advisors; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions LLC as claims agent.  As of Dec. 8, 2008, the
Debtors listed $7,604,195,000 in total assets and $12,972,541,148
in total debts.  Chadbourne & Parke LLP and Landis Rath LLP served
as co-counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.
AlixPartners LLP served as the Committee's financial advisor.
Landis Rath Moelis & Company served as the Committee's investment
banker.  Thomas G. Macauley, Esq., at Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, in
Wilmington, Delaware, represented the Committee in connection with
the lawsuit filed against former officers and shareholders for the
2007 LBO of Tribune.

Protracted negotiations and mediation efforts and numerous proposed
plans of reorganization filed by Tribune Co. and competing creditor
groups delayed Tribune's emergence from bankruptcy.  Many of the
disputes among creditors center on the 2007 leveraged buyout
fraudulence conveyance claims, the resolution of which is a key
issue in the bankruptcy case.

Judge Kevin J. Carey issued an order dated July 13, 2012,
overruling objections to the confirmation of Tribune Co. and its
debtor affiliates' Plan of Reorganization.  In November 2012,
Tribune received approval from the Federal Communications
Commission to transfer media licenses, one of the hurdles to
implementing the reorganization plan.  Aurelius Capital Management
LP failed in halting implementation of the plan pending appeal.

Tribune Co. exited Chapter 11 protection Dec. 31, 2012, ending four
years of reorganization.  The reorganization allowed a group of
banks and hedge funds, including Oaktree Capital Management and
JPMorgan Chase & Co., to take over the media company.              
     


TRINITY AFFORDABLE: S&P Lowers Ratings on 2015 Housing Bonds to BB-
-------------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings removed from CreditWatch its ratings on the
Public Finance Authority, Wis.' multifamily series 2015 A and 2015
A-T housing revenue bonds (Trinity Affordable Section 8 Assisted
Apartments Project), where they were placed on Dec. 29, 2017  with
negative implications. At the same time, S&P lowered the long-term
ratings on the bonds to 'BB-' from 'BB+'. The outlook is negative.


The rating action and negative outlook reflect S&P's view of:

-- The decline in the property's poor operating performance from
previous years due largely to issues at one of the five properties,
which has brought down the entire pool.

-- DSC has decreased significantly in recent years with the pool
operating at 1.0x and 1.01x maximum annual debt service (MADS) in
the last two years.

"The negative outlook reflects, in our view, the potential for the
property's operating performance to continue declining, further
decreasing Trinity's ability to maintain sufficient debt service
coverage levels," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Joanie
Monaghan.

On Sept. 8, 2017, the owner submitted a voluntary filing to the
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board regarding the executed
conditional purchase and sale agreements for the pool projects. The
anticipated sale is a result of a third-party consultant's
recommendation in response to the breach of the debt service
coverage (DSC) covenant in the project's loan agreement associated
with the bonds in March 2017. Under the loan agreement, the
borrower was required to engage a third-party management consultant
to recommend certain actions. The report attributed the decline in
DSC at the Northeast View project to a collapse in the main sewer
line at one of the properties, a fire at another building on the
same property, and the former management company's leasing
practices that resulted in increasing deferred maintenance and
ongoing renovations. The report also recommended pursuing tax
credit financing, property-wide capital improvements, and unit
upgrades. According to the owner, tax credit financing was not
possible, but capital improvements and unit upgrades in excess of
$1 million were performed. As of the date of this report, the
potential sale is not set to close until July 2018 and is still
awaiting approval from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), and for the buyer to finance the acquisition.


VIASAT INC: Egan-Jones Lowers Sr. Unsecured Ratings to B
--------------------------------------------------------
Egan-Jones Ratings Company, on June 1, 2018, downgraded the foreign
currency and local currency senior unsecured ratings on debt issued
by Viasat Incorporated to B from A3. EJR also downgraded the rating
on commercial paper issued by the Company to B from B+.

Viasat Inc. is a communications company based in Carlsbad,
California, with additional operations across the United States and
worldwide.



W.P.I.P. INC: Authorized to Use Cash Collateral on Interim Basis
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. David E. Rice in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland authorized W.P.I.P., Inc., to use the cash
collateral of JACE Note, LLC on an interim basis through June 17,
2018.

This Court will hold a hearing to consider the Debtor's request for
final approval of the Motion and the use of Cash Collateral on June
14, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

The Debtor may use the cash collateral to pay the post-petition
expenses that are ordinary, reasonable and necessary to the
operation of its business in conformity with the budget. Absent
JACE Note, LLC's prior written consent, the Debtor will not use
cash collateral to pay expenses in excess of 110% of the aggregate
amount of the budget for the period covered by the budget or in
excess of the actual costs incurred in operating its business.

The approved budget provides total expenses of $11,483 covering the
period beginning May 20, 2018 through June 17, 2018.

The Debtor is directed to promptly deposit $2,500 into a segregated
account to provide adequate assurance of payment for future utility
services, which deposit is reflected as a separate line item in the
attached budget. In addition, the Debtor will escrow $5,000 per
week, commencing the week ending June 3, 2018, for the sole purpose
of paying real estate taxes the Debtor expects will become due in
July 2018 for the real property on which the Debtor operates its
business, which escrowed funds are reflected as a separate line
item in the Budget. The Debtor will continue depositing $5,000 per
week into such account until the balance is enough to pay the full
amount of the projected real estate tax payment, and the Debtor
will pay the real estate taxes promptly thereafter.

As adequate protection for the use of its cash collateral, JACE
Note, LLC is granted valid, binding, enforceable and perfected
replacement liens in and to all property of the Debtor's estate of
the kind presently securing repayment of the Debtor's pre-petition
obligations to JACE Note, LLC, to the extent of any decrease or
diminution in the value of JACE Note, LLC's interest in its
pre-petition collateral, with such liens attaching to the
post-petition collateral to the same extent, validity, and priority
as such liens exist on the pre-petition collateral as of the date
on which the Debtor commenced this bankruptcy proceeding.

A full-text copy of the Interim Order is available at

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb13-12978-509.pdf

                     About W.P.I.P., Inc.

WPIP owns an industrial storage lot at 601 West Patapsco, Avenue,
Baltimore, Maryland that derives its income from renting surface
parking/storage space to commercial and industrial tenants.  Manus
Edward Suddreth is the sole shareholder of W.P.I.P., Inc., Patapsco
Excavating, Inc., Pollution Properties Inc. and Patapsco
Excavating/Silverlake, Inc.  As a result of Mr. Suddreth's Chapter
11 case (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 13-12978), all rights and powers of
Mr. Suddreth with respect to the Debtors flow to Charles R.
Goldstein, as trustee.  The Trustee and the Debtors seek entry of
an order authorizing the joint administration, for procedural
purposes only, with the case number assigned to the Suddreth Case
serving as the lead case.

W.P.I.P., Inc. f/k/a A.V. & E. Industries, Inc., and its affiliates
Patapsco Excavating, Inc.; Pollution Properties Inc.; and Patapsco
Excavating/Silverlake, Inc. filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. D.
Md. Case Nos. 18-16736 to 18-16739) on May 17, 2018.  The petitions
were signed by Charles R. Goldstein, Chapter 11 trustee for estate
of Manus Edward Suddreth.  The Debtors estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in debt.

The Hon. David E. Rice presides over these cases.

The Debtors tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP as counsel; and
3Cubed Advisory Services, LLC, as financial advisor.


WEST POINT MARKET: Seeks Authorization to Use Cash Collateral
-------------------------------------------------------------
West Point Market of Akron, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of
the Northern District of Ohio to authorize, on an interim basis,
use of cash collateral up to the amount of the cash requirement for
a period of 30 days from the Petition Date.

The Debtor seeks authority on an interim basis to use only the cash
collateral necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable damage to
the Debtor's business in an amount to be established at the interim
hearing on the Debtor's Motion.  The Debtor believes that the
continued use of cash collateral will assure that the going-concern
value of the Debtor and jobs of the Debtor's employees will not be
lost.

As set forth on the Debtor's cash flow projection, the Debtor
estimates that the cash requirement for the thirty days following
the Petition Date will approximately $213,000 and estimates that
income for the 30 days following the Petition Date will be
approximately $213,000.  Thus, the cash collateral should not
diminish in any material respect.

According to the Debtor's books and records, On Deck may have a
security interest in Debtor's property, which may include security
interests in all cash and cash equivalents in which the Debtor has
an ownership interest.

The Debtor believes that the continuation of its business
operations affords adequate protection to On Deck.  In addition,
the Debtor proposes that On Deck be granted valid and perfected,
replacement security interests in, and liens upon all assets of the
Debtor's estate to the same extent and priority as existed prior to
the Petition Date excepting avoidance actions and subject to
post-petition administrative expenses.

A full-text copy of the Cash Collateral Motion is available at

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/ohnb18-51253-10.pdf

                     About West Point Market

West Point Market of Akron, LLC, is a specialty family-owned
supermarket in Akron, Ohio.  West Point Market was founded in 1936
and is owned by Richard Vernon.

West Point Market of Akron sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 18-10659) on May 24,
2018.  In the petition signed by its member, Richard Vernon, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of less than $10 million.
The Hon. Alan M. Koschik presides over the case.  Julie K. Zurn,
Esq., of Zurn Law, LLC, is the Debtor's counsel.


WILLBROS GROUP: Primoris Services Holds 100% Stake as of June 1
---------------------------------------------------------------
Primoris Services Corporation disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that as of June 1,
2018, it beneficially owns 100 shares of common stock, par value
$0.05 per share, of Willbros Group, Inc., constituting 100 percent
of the shares outstanding.

On June 1, 2018, Waco Acquisition Vehicle, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of Primoris ("Merger Sub"), merged with and into
Willbros, with Willbros surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Primoris.

At the Effective Time, each share of Common Stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Merger was converted into the
right to receive $0.60, without interest and subject to any
required tax withholding, other than (i) treasury shares or shares
held by any direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Issuer and (ii) shares held by stockholders of Issuer, if any, who
properly exercise their appraisal rights under Delaware law.

At the Effective Time, the 100 shares of common stock of Merger Sub
that were outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time were
converted into and became 100 shares of common stock of the
Surviving Corporation.

Upon closing of the Merger, the Common Stock that previously traded
under the ticker symbol "WGRP", ceased trading on, and are being
delisted from the OTC Markets Group.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/iSBB8T

                      About Willbros Group

Based in Houston, Texas, Willbros -- http://www.willbros.com/-- is
a specialty energy infrastructure contractor serving the power and
oil and gas industries with offerings that primarily include
construction, maintenance and facilities development services.

The report from the Company's independent accounting firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company's auditor since 2011, on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31,
2017, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations, cash outflows from
operating activities and has a net capital deficiency that raise
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.

Willbros reported a net loss of $108.1 million in 2017 and a net
loss of $47.75 million in 2016.  As of March 31, 2018, Willbros
Group had $349.03 million in total assets, $333.9 million in total
liabilities and $15.17 million in total stockholders' equity.


X-TREME BULLETS: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Affiliated companies that filed voluntary petitions seeking relief
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

   Debtor                                           Case No.
   ------                                           --------
   X-Treme Bullets, Inc.                            18-50609
   25 Stokes Drive
   Carson City, NV 89706

   Howell Munitions & Technology, Inc.              18-50610
   Ammo Load Worldwide, Inc.                        18-50611
   Clearwater Bullet, Inc.                          18-50613
   Howell Machine, Inc.                             18-50614
   Freedom Munitions, LLC                           18-50615
   Lewis-Clark Ammuition Components, LLC            18-50616
   Components Exchange LLC                          18-50617

Business Description: X-Treme Bullets and its subsidiaries are in
                      the business of manufacturing and selling
                      small arms ammunition components, assembling
                      ammunition, custom building ammunition
                      manufacturing equipment, and repairing and
                      refurbishing existing ammunition
                      manufacturing equipment.  The Debtors sell
                      ammunition from company-owned brands, which
                      they manufacture in-house, as well as
                      ammunition from third-party brands, which
                      they source as finished goods.  The Debtors
                      operate a production facility in Carson
                      City, Nevada and operate four facilities in
                      Idaho, including three production facilities
                      and one distribution center.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: June 8, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Nevada (Reno)

Judge: Hon. Bruce T. Beesley

Debtor's Counsel: Stephen R. Harris, Esq.
                  HARRIS LAW PRACTICE LLC
                  6151 Lakeside Dr, Ste 2100
                  Reno, NV 89511
                  Tel: (775) 786-7600
                  Fax: (775) 786-7764
                  E-mail: steve@harrislawreno.com

                    - and -

                  Robert E. Opera, Esq.
                  WINTHROP COUCHOT GOLUBOW HOLLANDER, LLP
                  1301 Dover St, Ste 500
                  Newport Beach, CA 92660
                  Tel: (949) 720-4100
                  Fax: (949) 720 4111
                  E-mail: ropera@wcghlaw.com

Estimated Assets: $10 million to $50 million

Estimated Liabilities: $10 million to $50 million

The petition was signed by David Howell, president.

A full-text copy of X-Treme Bullets 's petition is available for
free at: http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb18-50609.pdf

List of Debtor's 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
P Kay Metal, Inc.                                      $3,595,847
Larry Kay
2448 E. 25th Street
Los Angeles, CA 90058

Crow Shooting                                            $473,233
Supply DROP SHIP
200 S. Front St.
Montezuma, IA 80171

Leader Tool Co. Inc.                                     $205,352

St. Marks Powder                                         $191,591

Bitterroot Security & Inv. LL                            $118,000

Hidir, Emir                                               $99,019

Oracle America                                            $86,079

Anatolia Fisek                                            $76,690
Sanayi ve Ticar Engin

UPS                                                       $75,574

Collier Electric                                          $57,984

Wynalda Packaging                                         $57,227

Media Two Interactive, LLC                                $50,000

NET Global                                                $48,410

Comm Trade USA, Inc.                                      $47,185

Binary Anvil Inc.                                         $42,114

IMC-Metals America, LLC                                   $40,621

Brand Makers LLC                                          $39,700

Listrak                                                   $35,590

Starline, Inc.                                            $33,450

STI International                                         $31,904


YBRANT MEDIA: DGHC Appointed as Receiver for Lycos' 56% Share
-------------------------------------------------------------
On Feb. 20, 2014, April 16, 2014, and May 5, 2015, the Court
granted three motions to confirm three separate arbitration awards
totaling approximately $36 million in the case captioned Daum
Global Holdings Corp., Petitioner, v. Ybrant Digital Limited, et
al., Respondents, No. 13-CV-3135 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y.). After Ybrant
Digital Limited and other Ybrant companies failed to make timely
payment of the awards to Petitioner Daum Global Holdings Corp., on
Oct. 6, 2015, the Court granted Petitioner's motion for a Turnover
Order compelling Ybrant to turn over the stock certificates
representing their 56% of shares of Respondent-Garnishee Lycos,
Inc. in order to satisfy the awards.

Ybrant did not turn over the certificates, and Petitioner now moves
the Court for partial enforcement of the Turnover Order by
appointing Daum as a receiver of Ybrant's 56% ownership interest in
Lycos. District Judge Alison J. Nathan grants the Petitioner's
motion.

Petitioner makes a few key arguments in favor of its application.
First, it asserts that there is "no ready market for the shares of
Lycos, as it is a private company whose ownership is divided and
whose accounts are not disclosed in public." Second, Daum argues
that the Respondents "have already made various attempts to move or
dissipate their US assets to evade enforcement of judgment
including attempted transfer of a Lycos division to the Cayman
Islands and sale of Lycos patent portfolios."

Respondents principally argue that receivership is inappropriate
because Daum has been presented with an alternative remedy "that it
is simply too inpatient to take advantage of." Specifically, Ybrant
affirms that it has sought financing in the amount of $150 million
from White Oak, part of which would be used to pay the judgment.
Ybrant argues that even though the Bankruptcy Court dismissed their
case, "it did not adjudicate the issue of whether the financing was
likely to be obtained."

Respondents also attempt to rebut Daum's arguments for why a
receivership is appropriate. First, Ybrant argues that the
receivership would only minimally increase the likelihood of Daum's
recovery on its judgment, given that the value of the 56% of Lycos
stock held by Ybrant, combined with the value of the 44% of Lycos
stock already held by Daum, "is insufficient to cover much of the
judgment held by the Judgment Creditor."

While that may be true, Ybrant offers no support for its implied
contention that receivership must be an all-or-nothing proposition.
That is, while the value of the 56% of Lycos stock in Ybrant's
hands may not even be worth the $20,000,000 it attested to in its
Corporate Monthly Operating Report filed in bankruptcy court, an
amount which would still be insufficient to fully satisfy the
judgment, receivership would nonetheless increase the likelihood
that Daum would recover at least part of the outstanding judgment.
Given the lack of any viable alternative, Ybrant's argument that
Daum would not be able to achieve full satisfaction through
receivership does nothing to persuade the Court to deny the motion
and block Daum's greater opportunity to achieve partial
satisfaction.

Respondents also argue that Daum's proffered evidence of fraud --
its transfer of assets to a Cayman Islands corporation and sale of
Lycos's patent portfolio -- is speculative and that the appointment
of a receiver would only hasten insolvency, not avoid it.

The Court finds that the risk of insolvency is high regardless of
the disposition of the motion. According to filings made in the
bankruptcy proceeding, Ybrant Media's assets consist of $100 cash
and its 56% ownership interest in Lycos, Inc., while its liability
exceeds $39 million (including what it owes to Daum). Ybrant
Digital disclosed that it has no assets in the United States other
than stock ownership of its U.S. subsidiaries, which are subject to
the Court's Turnover Order. However, there is reason to believe
that a receivership is necessary to prevent further diminution in
value. First, there is some evidence that Ybrant has sought to
strip Lycos of its value by transferring assets to India; Daum
successfully sued Ybrant in state court to obtain a preliminary
injunction to prevent the further transfer of assets from Lycos.
Even after the entry of the preliminary injunction, some Lycos
assets were moved to the Cayman Islands, and Ybrant announced that
it was selling Lycos's internet patents. Second, despite the
bankruptcy court's order that the legal fees of Ybrant's counsel
were to be paid by Ybrant Digital and not by Ybrant Media, the fees
were taken from Lycos causing the United States Trustee to seek
disgorgement of the improperly paid fees. While there may be no
conclusive proof the Judgment Debtors' fraudulent intent in taking
these actions, given this history, the added security Daum will
have as the appointed receiver militates in favor of granting the
motion.

Thus, the Court finds that the appointment of Judgment Creditor
Daum as receiver for the 56% share of Lycos held by Ybrant Media is
warranted. Because the assets going into receivership will be
applied in satisfaction of the judgment, there is no need for the
Court to set a bond amount.

In light of the foregoing, Daum is appointed as receiver of Debtor
Ybrant Media Acquisition, Inc.'s ownership interest in Lycos which
interest has been established as 56% of the capital stock of such
Respondent.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated
May 8, 2018 is available at https://bit.ly/2Lv5lLL from
Leagle.com.

Daum Global Holdings Corp., Petitioner, represented by Bo-Yong Park
-- bpark@byplaw.com -- The Law Office of Bo-Yong Park, P.C. &
William J.T. Brown , Law Office of William J.T. Brown.

Ybrant Digital Limited & Ybrant Media Acquisition, Inc.,
Respondents, represented by Alice Pin-Lan Ko -- ako@rosenpc.com. --
Rosen & Associates, P.C., Nancy Lynn Kurland, Sanford P. Rosen &
Associates, P.C. & Sanford Philip Rosen, Sanford P. Rosen &
Associates, P.C.

                       About Ybrant Media

Ybrant Media Acquisition, Inc., was incorporated in 2007 and is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Ybrant Digital Limited, a global digital
marketing company organized under the laws of India, whose shares
are publicly traded on the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National
Stock Exchange of India.  The Company was created to purchase and
manage the assets of Internet and media-related businesses.  Ybrant
holds a 56% interest in the search engine Lycos.

Ybrant Media sought bankruptcy protection after being sanctioned to
pay a $37 arbitration award to Daum Global Holdings Corp.

Ybrant Media filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-10597) on March 14, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Suresh K. Reddy as chief executive officer.  The Debtor
estimated assets in the range of $10 million to $50 million and
liabilities of up to $50 million.  Rosen & Associates, P.C., serves
as the Debtor's counsel.


ZALER POP: Pennsylvania Objects to Plan Confirmation
----------------------------------------------------
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry,
Unemployment Compensation Plan, objects to confirmation of amended
disclosure and plan filed by Zaler Pop Holdings of Wilkinsburg,
LLC.

The DLI asserts that Labor and Industry is a claimant having filed
a claim for secured pre-petition unemployment compensation taxes in
the amount of $35,335.95. The plan improperly reclassify Labor and
Industry’s secured claim to priority, and the plan does not
provide for unemployment compensation’s statutory rate of 9%.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor and Industry is
represented by Jennifer M. Irvin, Esq., of the Department of Labor
& Industry.

                   About Zaler Pop Holdings

Zaler Pop Holdings of Wilkinsburg LLC sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No.
17-20390) on Feb. 3, 2017.  The petition was signed by Ronald
Johnson, authorized representative.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtor estimated assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.  No
official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in the
case.


[*] Beard Group 25th Annual Distressed Investing Conference Nov. 26
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Conway MacKenzie is the latest sponsor for Beard Group's 2018
Distressed Investing (DI) Conference on Nov. 26, 2018.

Conway, a global management consulting and financial advisory firm,
joins law firm Foley & Lardner, DSI (Development Specialist Inc.),
provider of management consulting and financial advisory services,
and Longford Capital, a private investment company, in partnering
with the DI Conference, as it marks its Silver (25th) Anniversary
this year. This milestone denotes the event as the oldest,
influential DI conference in U.S. The day-long program will be held
at The Harmonie Club in New York City.  All four firms have been
supporting the DI Conference in past.

For a quarter of a century, the DI Conference's focus has been on
"Maximizing Profits in the Distressed Debt Market."  The event also
serves as a forum for leaders in corporate restructuring, lending
and debt and equity investments to gather and discuss the latest
topics and trends in the distressed investing industry, as well as
exchange ideas about high-profile chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings
and out-of-court restructurings. These are distinguished
professionals who place their resources and reputations at risk to
produce stellar results by preserving jobs, rebuilding broken
businesses, and efficiently redeploying underutilized assets in the
marketplace.

The conference will also feature:

     * a luncheon presentation of the Harvey K. Miller Award to
       Edward I. Altman, Professor of Finance, Emeritus, New York
       University's Stern School of Business.  The award will be
       presented by last year's winner billionaire Marc Lasry,
       Altman's  former student.

     * an evening awards dinner recognizing the 2018 Turnarounds
       & Workouts Outstanding Young Restructuring Lawyers.

To register for the one-day conference visit:

          https://www.distressedinvestingconference.com/
     Discounted early registration tickets are now available.

To learn how you can be a sponsor and participate in shaping the
day-long program, contact:

            Bernard Tolliver at bernard@beardgroup.com
                   or Tel: (240) 629-3300 x-149

To learn about media sponsorship opportunities to bring your outlet
into the view of leaders in corporate restructuring, lending and
debt and equity investments, and

to expand your network of news sources, contact:

                 Jeff Baxt at jeff@beardgroup.com
                    or (240) 629-3300, ext 150


[*] BRG Honored for Advising on Cross-Border Deal of the Year
-------------------------------------------------------------
The M&A Advisor's 10th Annual International M&A Awards recognized
Berkeley Research Group as among the firms advising on the
Cross-Border Restructuring Deal of the Year (over $5 billion) in
the restructuring of SunEdison Inc.  The BRG team consisted of Bob
Butler, John Esposito, Joseph Vizzini, Ron Zaidman, Jonathan
Emerson and Jay Wu.

"Since the introduction of the International M&A Awards in 2009, we
have continued to witness the dynamic growth of cross-border M&A.
Geopolitics and technological innovation have played an important
role in international dealmaking during this past year, and the
winning award nominations certainly reflect that trend," said David
Fergusson, president and co-CEO of The M&A Advisor.  "The global
M&A experts, whose expertise is reflected in their achievement as
2018 award winners, earned these honors by standing out in a group
of very impressive candidates."

The BRG Corporate Finance team has been trusted at the helm of
negotiations for some of the most complex domestic and
international reorganizations in recent history.  The team's senior
professionals average over 20 years of experience working with
attorneys, lenders, companies and investors.  BRG's broad scope of
restructuring and bankruptcy services spans areas that include
financial analysis, plan development and implementation and advice
on sale/merger transactions.  BRG professionals' leading-edge
insights as valuation advisors, crisis managers and corporate
officers in middle-market to multinational restructurings across a
diverse number of industries let them quickly present practical
alternatives, design strategies that help maximize value and
recommend the most viable approaches.

"BRG's Corporate Finance team provides an invaluable breadth and
depth of knowledge across sectors, disciplines and geographies,"
said BRG Chairman and Principal Executive Officer David J. Teece.
"Through a combination of keen insight into the bigger picture and
close attention to detail, they offer the in-depth perspective that
helps our clients take full advantage of the opportunities ahead."

                     About The M&A Advisor

The M&A Advisor -- http://www.maadvisor.com/-- was founded in 1998
to offer insights and intelligence on mergers and acquisitions
through the industry's leading publication.  Today, the firm is
recognized as the world's premier think tank and leadership
organization for M&A, restructuring and financing professionals,
providing a range of integrated services including: M&A Advisor
Forums and Summits; M&A Advisor Market Intelligence; M&A.TV.; M&A
Advisor Live; M&A Advisor Awards; and M&A Advisor Connects.

                 About Berkeley Research Group

Berkeley Research Group -- http://www.thinkbrg.com/-- is a global
strategic advisory and expert consulting firm that provides
independent advice, data analytics, valuation, authoritative
studies, expert testimony, investigations, transaction advisory,
restructuring services, regulatory and dispute consulting to
Fortune 500 corporations, financial institutions, investors, major
law firms and regulatory bodies around the world.  BRG experts and
consultants combine intellectual rigor with practical, real-world
experience and an in-depth understanding of industries and markets.
Their expertise spans economics and finance, data analytics and
statistics, and public policy in many of the major sectors of our
economy, including healthcare, banking, information technology,
energy, construction and real estate.  BRG is headquartered in
Emeryville, California, with offices across the United States and
in Asia, Australia, Canada, Latin America, the Middle East and the
United Kingdom.


[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet
------------------------------------------------
                                               Total
                                              Share-      Total
                                   Total    Holders'    Working
                                  Assets      Equity    Capital
  Company         Ticker            ($MM)       ($MM)      ($MM)
  -------         ------          ------    --------    -------
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT CN            90.8       (57.6)     (34.4)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  OU1 GR            90.8       (57.6)     (34.4)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ALSWF US          90.8       (57.6)     (34.4)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT2EUR EU        90.8       (57.6)     (34.4)
ACELRX PHARMA     R5X GR            65.8       (46.9)      40.4
ACELRX PHARMA     R5X TH            65.8       (46.9)      40.4
ACELRX PHARMA     ACRX US           65.8       (46.9)      40.4
ACELRX PHARMA     ACRXUSD EU        65.8       (46.9)      40.4
AGENUS INC        AGEN US          130.8      (113.2)      35.0
AGENUS INC        AGENUSD EU       130.8      (113.2)      35.0
AMER RESTAUR-LP   ICTPU US          33.5        (4.0)      (6.2)
AMERICA'S CAR-MA  HC9 GR           456.3      (204.3)     353.9
AMERICA'S CAR-MA  CRMT US          456.3      (204.3)     353.9
AMERICA'S CAR-MA  CRMTEUR EU       456.3      (204.3)     353.9
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL11EUR EU   53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL AV        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL TE        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G SW        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL1CHF EU    53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  0HE6 LN       53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GZ        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G QT        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL US        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL* MM       53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G GR        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  AAL1USD EU    53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMERICAN AIRLINE  A1G TH        53,280.0    (1,018.0)  (7,335.0)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 GR          118.2      (286.2)     (36.7)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 TH          118.2      (286.2)     (36.7)
AMYRIS INC        AMRS US          118.2      (286.2)     (36.7)
AMYRIS INC        AMRSUSD EU       118.2      (286.2)     (36.7)
AMYRIS INC        3A01 QT          118.2      (286.2)     (36.7)
AMYRIS INC        AMRSEUR EU       118.2      (286.2)     (36.7)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST GR           246.0      (278.6)    (366.6)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPNUSD EU       246.0      (278.6)    (366.6)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST TH           246.0      (278.6)    (366.6)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPNEUR EU       246.0      (278.6)    (366.6)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST QT           246.0      (278.6)    (366.6)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPN US          246.0      (278.6)    (366.6)
ATLATSA RESOURCE  ATL SJ           206.1      (205.9)       6.0
AUTODESK INC      ADSK US        3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      AUD TH         3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      AUD GR         3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK AV        3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      ADSKEUR EU     3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK LN        3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      AUD GZ         3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK* MM       3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      AUD QT         3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTODESK INC      ADSK TE        3,911.4      (128.6)    (154.6)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GR         9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TH         9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO US         9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOUSD EU      9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      0HJL LN        9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EU      9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 QT         9,301.8    (1,361.6)    (247.1)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVID US          250.8      (171.6)     (19.9)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GR           250.8      (171.6)     (19.9)
AXIM BIOTECHNOLO  AXIM US            0.8        (7.8)      (7.2)
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFTEUR EU       187.8       (18.0)       8.2
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFT US          187.8       (18.0)       8.2
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BTF GR           187.8       (18.0)       8.2
BLUE BIRD CORP    BLBD US          277.2       (70.0)       2.6
BLUE RIDGE MOUNT  BRMR US        1,060.2      (212.5)     (62.4)
BOMBARDIER INC-A  BDRAF US      26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-A  BBD1 GR       26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-A  BBD/AEUR EU   26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-A  BBD/A CN      26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBD/B CN      26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDB TH       26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BDRBF US      26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  0QZP LN       26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDB GZ       26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDBN MM      26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDB QT       26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBD/BEUR EU   26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBDB GR       26,726.0    (4,284.0)   1,212.0
BRINKER INTL      EAT US         1,336.9      (608.5)    (305.0)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ GR         1,336.9      (608.5)    (305.0)
BRINKER INTL      EAT2EUR EU     1,336.9      (608.5)    (305.0)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ QT         1,336.9      (608.5)    (305.0)
BROOKFIELD REAL   BRE CN           100.8       (34.8)       3.4
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOO CN         2,643.7      (366.1)    (166.9)
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A GR        2,643.7      (366.1)    (166.9)
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  BRPIF US       2,643.7      (366.1)    (166.9)
CACTUS INC- A     WHD US           358.3       227.3      109.0
CACTUS INC- A     43C GR           358.3       227.3      109.0
CACTUS INC- A     43C QT           358.3       227.3      109.0
CACTUS INC- A     WHDEUR EU        358.3       227.3      109.0
CACTUS INC- A     43C TH           358.3       227.3      109.0
CACTUS INC- A     43C GZ           358.3       227.3      109.0
CADIZ INC         CDZI US           62.9       (82.9)       5.6
CADIZ INC         0HS4 LN           62.9       (82.9)       5.6
CADIZ INC         2ZC GR            62.9       (82.9)       5.6
CAMBIUM LEARNING  ABCD US          146.9       (11.6)     (70.4)
CARDLYTICS INC    CDLX US          157.8        40.6       55.3
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX TH           157.8        40.6       55.3
CARDLYTICS INC    CDLXEUR EU       157.8        40.6       55.3
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX QT           157.8        40.6       55.3
CARDLYTICS INC    CDLXUSD EU       157.8        40.6       55.3
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX GR           157.8        40.6       55.3
CARDLYTICS INC    CYX GZ           157.8        40.6       55.3
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 GR           631.4       (38.8)       0.3
CASELLA WASTE     CWST US          631.4       (38.8)       0.3
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 TH           631.4       (38.8)       0.3
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTEUR EU       631.4       (38.8)       0.3
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTUSD EU       631.4       (38.8)       0.3
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G QT         2,697.9      (217.0)     465.1
CDK GLOBAL INC    0HQR LN        2,697.9      (217.0)     465.1
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDKUSD EU      2,697.9      (217.0)     465.1
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G TH         2,697.9      (217.0)     465.1
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDKEUR EU      2,697.9      (217.0)     465.1
CDK GLOBAL INC    C2G GR         2,697.9      (217.0)     465.1
CDK GLOBAL INC    CDK US         2,697.9      (217.0)     465.1
CEDAR FAIR LP     FUN US         2,004.6       (51.0)     (99.2)
CEDAR FAIR LP     7CF GR         2,004.6       (51.0)     (99.2)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 TH        12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK* MM       12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHKEUR EU     12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 GZ        12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHKUSD EU     12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  0HWL LN       12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 GR        12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK US        12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 QT        12,086.0       (97.0)  (1,130.0)
CHINA CRAWFISH L  CACA US            0.0        (0.0)      (0.0)
CHOICE HOTELS     CZH GR         1,052.0      (259.9)     (37.4)
CHOICE HOTELS     CHH US         1,052.0      (259.9)     (37.4)
CINCINNATI BELL   CBB US         2,186.0      (127.9)     349.7
CINCINNATI BELL   CIB1 GR        2,186.0      (127.9)     349.7
CINCINNATI BELL   CBBEUR EU      2,186.0      (127.9)     349.7
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   CCO US         4,615.5    (1,993.6)     269.8
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   C7C GR         4,615.5    (1,993.6)     269.8
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF* MM        2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF US         2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA TH         2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF2 EU        2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  0I0H LN        2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA GZ         2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF2EUR EU     2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA GR         2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA QT         2,862.9      (484.8)     987.5
COGENT COMMUNICA  OGM1 GR          716.5       (97.1)     233.1
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOI US          716.5       (97.1)     233.1
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOIUSD EU       716.5       (97.1)     233.1
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  CHRSUSD EU       128.5        (3.1)      84.6
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  8C5 QT           128.5        (3.1)      84.6
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  8C5 TH           128.5        (3.1)      84.6
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  CHRSEUR EU       128.5        (3.1)      84.6
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  CHRS US          128.5        (3.1)      84.6
COHERUS BIOSCIEN  8C5 GR           128.5        (3.1)      84.6
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 GR        17,311.0      (178.0)   1,730.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH US        17,311.0      (178.0)   1,730.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH1USD EU    17,311.0      (178.0)   1,730.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 QT        17,311.0      (178.0)   1,730.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CYH1EUR EU    17,311.0      (178.0)   1,730.0
COMMUNITY HEALTH  CG5 TH        17,311.0      (178.0)   1,730.0
COMSTOCK RES INC  CRK US           910.5      (409.9)      41.0
CONSUMER CAPITAL  CCGN US            1.7        (4.6)      (1.6)
CONVERGEONE HOLD  CVON US          986.0      (109.6)       3.1
DELEK LOGISTICS   DKL US           665.9      (130.6)      22.9
DELEK LOGISTICS   D6L GR           665.9      (130.6)      22.9
DENNY'S CORP      DENN US          333.6      (121.4)     (44.7)
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 GR           333.6      (121.4)     (44.7)
DENNY'S CORP      DENNEUR EU       333.6      (121.4)     (44.7)
DEX MEDIA INC     DMDA US        1,419.0    (1,284.0)  (1,999.0)
DINE BRANDS GLOB  DIN US         1,651.0      (216.9)      72.8
DINE BRANDS GLOB  IHP GR         1,651.0      (216.9)      72.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GR         2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DLMAF US       2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DOL CN         2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GZ         2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DOLEUR EU      2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 TH         2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 QT         2,052.7      (146.6)      29.8
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ US           798.3    (2,770.9)     151.7
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GR           798.3    (2,770.9)     151.7
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZEUR EU        798.3    (2,770.9)     151.7
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZUSD EU        798.3    (2,770.9)     151.7
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV TH           798.3    (2,770.9)     151.7
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV QT           798.3    (2,770.9)     151.7
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB US         1,943.3      (831.8)    (435.3)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 GR         1,943.3      (831.8)    (435.3)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB1USD EU     1,943.3      (831.8)    (435.3)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 QT         1,943.3      (831.8)    (435.3)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB1EUR EU     1,943.3      (831.8)    (435.3)
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB TH         3,244.1      (860.3)     206.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKN US        3,244.1      (860.3)     206.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GR         3,244.1      (860.3)     206.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GZ         3,244.1      (860.3)     206.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKNUSD EU     3,244.1      (860.3)     206.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB QT         3,244.1      (860.3)     206.6
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKNEUR EU     3,244.1      (860.3)     206.6
EGAIN CORP        EGCA GR           37.6        (9.2)     (10.9)
EGAIN CORP        EGAN US           37.6        (9.2)     (10.9)
EGAIN CORP        0IFM LN           37.6        (9.2)     (10.9)
EGAIN CORP        EGANEUR EU        37.6        (9.2)     (10.9)
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P GR           212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ENPHASE ENERGY    ENPH US          212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ENPHASE ENERGY    ENPHUSD EU       212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ENPHASE ENERGY    0QYE LN          212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P QT           212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ENPHASE ENERGY    ENPHEUR EU       212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P TH           212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ENPHASE ENERGY    E0P GZ           212.1       (31.2)      44.2
ERIN ENERGY CORP  ERN SJ           251.1      (362.8)    (347.0)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C GR         1,474.7      (124.8)      (1.9)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C TH         1,474.7      (124.8)      (1.9)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRI US        1,474.7      (124.8)      (1.9)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIUSD EU     1,474.7      (124.8)      (1.9)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIEUR EU     1,474.7      (124.8)      (1.9)
EXELA TECHNOLOGI  XELAU US       1,665.9       (35.1)     (29.5)
EXELA TECHNOLOGI  XELA US        1,665.9       (35.1)     (29.5)
FERRELLGAS-LP     FGP US         1,532.6      (812.6)      26.0
FTS INTERNATIONA  FTSI US          854.5       (85.2)     306.9
FTS INTERNATIONA  FT5 QT           854.5       (85.2)     306.9
GAMCO INVESTO-A   GBL US           117.0       (72.6)       -
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC US         1,527.8      (179.2)     251.8
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC1USD EU     1,527.8      (179.2)     251.8
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC* MM        1,527.8      (179.2)     251.8
GNC HOLDINGS INC  0IT2 LN        1,527.8      (179.2)     251.8
GOGO INC          GOGO US        1,300.1      (191.3)     356.0
GOGO INC          GOGOEUR EU     1,300.1      (191.3)     356.0
GOGO INC          0IYQ LN        1,300.1      (191.3)     356.0
GOGO INC          G0G QT         1,300.1      (191.3)     356.0
GOGO INC          G0G GR         1,300.1      (191.3)     356.0
GOOSEHEAD INSU-A  GSHD US           22.2       (37.4)       -
GREEN PLAINS PAR  GPP US            96.9       (64.7)       4.7
GREEN PLAINS PAR  8GP GR            96.9       (64.7)       4.7
GREENSKY INC-A    GSKY US          521.3       (24.5)      (1.4)
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB TH         2,561.3      (698.1)     617.6
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB US         2,561.3      (698.1)     617.6
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB GR         2,561.3      (698.1)     617.6
H&R BLOCK INC     0HOB LN        2,561.3      (698.1)     617.6
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB QT         2,561.3      (698.1)     617.6
H&R BLOCK INC     HRBEUR EU      2,561.3      (698.1)     617.6
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH TH        37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA US        37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH GR        37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA* MM       37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAUSD EU     37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  0J1R LN       37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH QT        37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAEUR EU     37,299.0    (4,434.0)   2,913.0
HELIUS MEDICAL T  26H GR             5.7        (2.2)      (2.4)
HELIUS MEDICAL T  HSM CN             5.7        (2.2)      (2.4)
HELIUS MEDICAL T  HSDT US            5.7        (2.2)      (2.4)
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLF US         2,968.7      (219.0)   1,040.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO GR         2,968.7      (219.0)   1,040.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO GZ         2,968.7      (219.0)   1,040.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFUSD EU      2,968.7      (219.0)   1,040.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HLFEUR EU      2,968.7      (219.0)   1,040.2
HERBALIFE NUTRIT  HOO QT         2,968.7      (219.0)   1,040.2
HP COMPANY-BDR    HPQB34 BZ     32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQ TE        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQ US        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            7HP TH        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            7HP GR        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQEUR EU     32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            7HP GZ        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            0J2E LN       32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD SW     32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQ* MM       32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HWP QT        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQCHF EU     32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD EU     32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQ SW        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
HP INC            HPQ CI        32,087.0    (1,863.0)  (3,694.0)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX AV        1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GZ         1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IDEXX LABS        0J8P LN        1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 QT         1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 TH         1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX US        1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GR         1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX TE        1,469.5       (49.0)     (27.1)
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMGN US          265.0       (36.3)     181.2
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU TH           265.0       (36.3)     181.2
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU GZ           265.0       (36.3)     181.2
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMGNEUR EU       265.0       (36.3)     181.2
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMGNUSD EU       265.0       (36.3)     181.2
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU QT           265.0       (36.3)     181.2
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU GR           265.0       (36.3)     181.2
INFRASTRUCTURE A  IEA US           118.2      (119.8)     (18.8)
INNOVIVA INC      HVE GR           276.7      (212.7)     109.2
INNOVIVA INC      INVAEUR EU       276.7      (212.7)     109.2
INNOVIVA INC      HVE GZ           276.7      (212.7)     109.2
INNOVIVA INC      INVA US          276.7      (212.7)     109.2
INNOVIVA INC      HVE TH           276.7      (212.7)     109.2
INNOVIVA INC      HVE QT           276.7      (212.7)     109.2
INTERCEPT PHARMA  I4P QT           393.8       (52.3)     284.4
INTERCEPT PHARMA  ICPTUSD EU       393.8       (52.3)     284.4
INTERCEPT PHARMA  I4P TH           393.8       (52.3)     284.4
INTERCEPT PHARMA  ICPT US          393.8       (52.3)     284.4
INTERCEPT PHARMA  I4P GR           393.8       (52.3)     284.4
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 TH           571.1       (18.1)     213.4
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWD US          571.1       (18.1)     213.4
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 GR           571.1       (18.1)     213.4
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWDUSD EU       571.1       (18.1)     213.4
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 QT           571.1       (18.1)     213.4
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWDEUR EU       571.1       (18.1)     213.4
ISRAMCO INC       IRM GR           110.7       (19.2)      (7.0)
ISRAMCO INC       ISRL US          110.7       (19.2)      (7.0)
ISRAMCO INC       ISRLEUR EU       110.7       (19.2)      (7.0)
IWEB INC          IWBB US            1.0        (0.6)      (0.6)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK US          875.0      (430.9)     (22.4)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GR           875.0      (430.9)     (22.4)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GZ           875.0      (430.9)     (22.4)
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX QT           875.0      (430.9)     (22.4)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK1EUR EU      875.0      (430.9)     (22.4)
JAMBA INC         JMBA US           40.6       (14.6)     (22.0)
KERYX BIOPHARM    KYX TH           140.1       (31.6)      74.6
KERYX BIOPHARM    KYX QT           140.1       (31.6)      74.6
KERYX BIOPHARM    KERXEUR EU       140.1       (31.6)      74.6
KERYX BIOPHARM    KERXUSD EU       140.1       (31.6)      74.6
KERYX BIOPHARM    KYX GR           140.1       (31.6)      74.6
KERYX BIOPHARM    KERX US          140.1       (31.6)      74.6
L BRANDS INC      LB US          7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD TH         7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
L BRANDS INC      LBUSD EU       7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
L BRANDS INC      0JSC LN        7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD QT         7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
L BRANDS INC      LBEUR EU       7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
L BRANDS INC      LB* MM         7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD GR         7,749.0      (969.0)   1,032.0
LAMB WESTON       0L5 QT         2,753.9      (337.6)     418.9
LAMB WESTON       LW-WUSD EU     2,753.9      (337.6)     418.9
LAMB WESTON       LW US          2,753.9      (337.6)     418.9
LAMB WESTON       0L5 GR         2,753.9      (337.6)     418.9
LAMB WESTON       LW-WEUR EU     2,753.9      (337.6)     418.9
LAMB WESTON       0L5 TH         2,753.9      (337.6)     418.9
LEGACY RESERVES   LGCY US        1,495.6      (201.1)     (30.0)
LEGACY RESERVES   LRT GR         1,495.6      (201.1)     (30.0)
LEGACY RESERVES   LRT GZ         1,495.6      (201.1)     (30.0)
LEGACY RESERVES   LRT QT         1,495.6      (201.1)     (30.0)
LENNOX INTL INC   LII US         2,086.1      (102.6)     634.0
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI TH         2,086.1      (102.6)     634.0
LENNOX INTL INC   LII1EUR EU     2,086.1      (102.6)     634.0
LENNOX INTL INC   LXI GR         2,086.1      (102.6)     634.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LOM TH        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   0R3E LN       46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LOM GZ        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT1EUR EU    46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LOM QT        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT1CHF EU    46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT1USD EU    46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT US        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LOM GR        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT* MM       46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT SW        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT TE        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED MARTIN   LMT AV        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED-BDR      LMTB34 BZ     46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
LOCKHEED-CEDEAR   LMT AR        46,634.0      (111.0)   3,842.0
MCDONALDS - BDR   MCDC34 BZ     33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD US        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD SW        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GR        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD* MM       33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD TE        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO TH        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDEUR EU     33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GZ        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD AV        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD SW     33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO QT        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDCHF EU     33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD EU     33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD CI        33,722.9    (4,718.8)   2,087.9
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCA US        1,701.1      (135.3)    (195.9)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MD7A GR        1,701.1      (135.3)    (195.9)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCAEUR EU     1,701.1      (135.3)    (195.9)
MICHAELS COS INC  MIK US         2,300.2    (1,509.5)     719.0
MICHAELS COS INC  MIM GR         2,300.2    (1,509.5)     719.0
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N GR        4,509.2      (232.7)     (58.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N TH        4,509.2      (232.7)     (58.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIEUR EU      4,509.2      (232.7)     (58.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIUSD EU      4,509.2      (232.7)     (58.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N QT        4,509.2      (232.7)     (58.3)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGI US         4,509.2      (232.7)     (58.3)
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MOT TE         9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI US         9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA TH        9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1EUR EU     9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GZ        9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1USD EU     9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  0K3H LN        9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GR        9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA QT        9,051.0    (1,539.0)     525.0
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGN US          855.6      (693.3)     212.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGNUSD EU       855.6      (693.3)     212.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 QT           855.6      (693.3)     212.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGNEUR EU       855.6      (693.3)     212.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 TH           855.6      (693.3)     212.2
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 GR           855.6      (693.3)     212.2
NATERA INC        NTRA US          218.7        (3.9)      83.1
NATERA INC        45E GR           218.7        (3.9)      83.1
NATHANS FAMOUS    NATH US           80.1       (84.6)      53.7
NATHANS FAMOUS    NFA GR            80.1       (84.6)      53.7
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMI US        1,157.7       (84.4)       -
NATIONAL CINEMED  XWM GR         1,157.7       (84.4)       -
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMIEUR EU     1,157.7       (84.4)       -
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GR         6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAV US         6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR TH         6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GZ         6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAVEUR EU      6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAVUSD EU      6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR QT         6,487.0    (4,527.0)     456.0
NEOS THERAPEUTIC  NTE GR            97.4        (4.5)      32.9
NEOS THERAPEUTIC  NEOS US           97.4        (4.5)      32.9
NEW ENG RLTY-LP   NEN US           256.1       (34.6)       -
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYMXEUR EU         1.0        (1.0)      (1.1)
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYMXUSD EU         1.0        (1.0)      (1.1)
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYMX US            1.0        (1.0)      (1.1)
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYM GZ             1.0        (1.0)      (1.1)
OMEROS CORP       OMER US           89.0       (29.2)      54.1
OMEROS CORP       3O8 GR            89.0       (29.2)      54.1
OMEROS CORP       OMERUSD EU        89.0       (29.2)      54.1
OMEROS CORP       0KBU LN           89.0       (29.2)      54.1
OMEROS CORP       OMEREUR EU        89.0       (29.2)      54.1
OMEROS CORP       3O8 TH            89.0       (29.2)      54.1
OPTEC INTERNATIO  OPTI US            0.2        (0.8)      (0.9)
OPTIVA INC        RE6 GR           188.7       (12.7)      28.2
OPTIVA INC        OPT CN           188.7       (12.7)      28.2
OPTIVA INC        RKNEF US         188.7       (12.7)      28.2
OPTIVA INC        RKNEUR EU        188.7       (12.7)      28.2
OPTIVA INC        3230510Q EU      188.7       (12.7)      28.2
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZAEUR EU       579.8      (242.2)      22.8
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZA US          579.8      (242.2)      22.8
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 GR           579.8      (242.2)      22.8
PENN NATL GAMING  PN1 GR         5,165.5       (33.6)    (140.6)
PENN NATL GAMING  PENN US        5,165.5       (33.6)    (140.6)
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GR        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM US         43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 EU        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EU     43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 TE        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 TH        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI SW        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EU     43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM LN         43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GZ        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 QT        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMOR AV       43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI1 IX       43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI EB        43,070.0   (10,482.0)   2,905.0
PINNACLE ENTERTA  65P GR         3,884.8      (301.5)     (30.0)
PINNACLE ENTERTA  PNK US         3,884.8      (301.5)     (30.0)
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1USD EU    1,115.9      (122.4)      77.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  0KJD LN        1,115.9      (122.4)      77.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1EUR EU    1,115.9      (122.4)      77.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL QT         1,115.9      (122.4)      77.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT US        1,115.9      (122.4)      77.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL TH         1,115.9      (122.4)      77.1
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL GR         1,115.9      (122.4)      77.1
PLURALSIGHT IN-A  PS US            234.0       (58.1)     (71.1)
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PH2 GR           280.5       (55.1)      86.0
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PRO US           280.5       (55.1)      86.0
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PRO1EUR EU       280.5       (55.1)      86.0
REATA PHARMACE-A  2R3 GR           136.8      (142.7)      83.4
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETAEUR EU       136.8      (142.7)      83.4
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETA US          136.8      (142.7)      83.4
REMARK HOLD INC   MARK US          102.8       (21.2)     (29.4)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   REN US           686.3       (81.6)    (129.6)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   R21 GR           686.3       (81.6)    (129.6)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   RENEUR EU        686.3       (81.6)    (129.6)
REVLON INC-A      REV US         3,042.1      (855.7)     105.3
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 GR        3,042.1      (855.7)     105.3
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 TH        3,042.1      (855.7)     105.3
REVLON INC-A      REVEUR EU      3,042.1      (855.7)     105.3
REVLON INC-A      REVUSD EU      3,042.1      (855.7)     105.3
RH                RH US          1,732.9        (7.3)     125.6
RH                0KTF LN        1,732.9        (7.3)     125.6
RH                RHEUR EU       1,732.9        (7.3)     125.6
RH                RH* MM         1,732.9        (7.3)     125.6
RH                RS1 GR         1,732.9        (7.3)     125.6
RIMINI STREET IN  RMNI US          145.2      (205.8)    (117.3)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 TH           178.8        (1.6)     (63.2)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 GR           178.8        (1.6)     (63.2)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST US           178.8        (1.6)     (63.2)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1EUR EU       178.8        (1.6)     (63.2)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1USD EU       178.8        (1.6)     (63.2)
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN TH        3,680.6      (188.3)     607.2
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDUSD EU      3,680.6      (188.3)     607.2
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDEUR EU      3,680.6      (188.3)     607.2
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN GR        3,680.6      (188.3)     607.2
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRD US         3,680.6      (188.3)     607.2
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  S7V GR         2,100.2      (315.0)     608.3
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBH US         2,100.2      (315.0)     608.3
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBHEUR EU      2,100.2      (315.0)     608.3
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SN* MM         2,903.8       (33.4)     212.2
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SN US          2,903.8       (33.4)     212.2
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  13S QT         2,903.8       (33.4)     212.2
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SNEUR EU       2,903.8       (33.4)     212.2
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SNUSD EU       2,903.8       (33.4)     212.2
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  13S TH         2,903.8       (33.4)     212.2
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  13S GR         2,903.8       (33.4)     212.2
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GZ         7,405.1    (2,588.2)      51.9
SBA COMM CORP     SBACUSD EU     7,405.1    (2,588.2)      51.9
SBA COMM CORP     0KYZ LN        7,405.1    (2,588.2)      51.9
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GR         7,405.1    (2,588.2)      51.9
SBA COMM CORP     SBAC US        7,405.1    (2,588.2)      51.9
SBA COMM CORP     SBACEUR EU     7,405.1    (2,588.2)      51.9
SBA COMM CORP     SBJ TH         7,405.1    (2,588.2)      51.9
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  SGMS US        7,737.2    (2,196.1)     554.9
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW GR         7,737.2    (2,196.1)     554.9
SCIENTIFIC GAMES  TJW TH         7,737.2    (2,196.1)     554.9
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA GR         5,041.1      (364.8)     242.4
SEALED AIR CORP   SEE US         5,041.1      (364.8)     242.4
SEALED AIR CORP   SEE1EUR EU     5,041.1      (364.8)     242.4
SEALED AIR CORP   SEE1USD EU     5,041.1      (364.8)     242.4
SEALED AIR CORP   0L4F LN        5,041.1      (364.8)     242.4
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA TH         5,041.1      (364.8)     242.4
SEALED AIR CORP   SDA QT         5,041.1      (364.8)     242.4
SENSEONICS HLDGS  SENS US           77.8       (13.2)      55.3
SIGA TECH INC     SIGA US          133.1      (334.6)      26.9
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GR         8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO TH         8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIEUR EU     8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GZ         8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI AV        8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIUSD EU     8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  0L6Z LN        8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI US        8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO QT         8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI TE        8,299.3    (1,564.5)  (2,267.2)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE GR         2,444.0      (203.7)    (316.4)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIXEUR EU      2,444.0      (203.7)    (316.4)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIX US         2,444.0      (203.7)    (316.4)
SOLARWINDOW TECH  WNDW LN            2.1        (2.0)       1.9
SONIC CORP        SONC US          561.5      (252.7)      73.4
SONIC CORP        SO4 GR           561.5      (252.7)      73.4
SONIC CORP        SO4 TH           561.5      (252.7)      73.4
SONIC CORP        SONCEUR EU       561.5      (252.7)      73.4
SURFACE ONCOLOGY  SURF US            -         (21.0)       -
SURFACE ONCOLOGY  QSOA GR            -         (21.0)       -
SURFACE ONCOLOGY  SURFEUR EU         -         (21.0)       -
TAUBMAN CENTERS   0LDD LN        4,246.0      (162.4)       -
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TU8 GR         4,246.0      (162.4)       -
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TCO US         4,246.0      (162.4)       -
TOWN SPORTS INTE  CLUB US          251.8       (73.5)       5.9
TOWN SPORTS INTE  T3D GR           251.8       (73.5)       5.9
TOWN SPORTS INTE  CLUBEUR EU       251.8       (73.5)       5.9
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG US        10,394.7    (2,309.3)   1,657.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D GR        10,394.7    (2,309.3)   1,657.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D TH        10,394.7    (2,309.3)   1,657.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   0REK LN       10,394.7    (2,309.3)   1,657.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGEUR EU     10,394.7    (2,309.3)   1,657.3
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D QT        10,394.7    (2,309.3)   1,657.3
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GR         1,444.8      (108.4)     (28.0)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP US         1,444.8      (108.4)     (28.0)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP GZ         1,444.8      (108.4)     (28.0)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP TH         1,444.8      (108.4)     (28.0)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1EUR EU     1,444.8      (108.4)     (28.0)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP1USD EU     1,444.8      (108.4)     (28.0)
TUPPERWARE BRAND  TUP QT         1,444.8      (108.4)     (28.0)
TURTLE BEACH COR  HEAR US           52.3       (20.4)      24.4
TURTLE BEACH COR  PAMTUSD EU        52.3       (20.4)      24.4
TURTLE BEACH COR  0P1A GR           52.3       (20.4)      24.4
TURTLE BEACH COR  PAMTEUR EU        52.3       (20.4)      24.4
TURTLE BEACH COR  0P1A TH           52.3       (20.4)      24.4
UNISYS CORP       UIS EU         2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       USY1 TH        2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GR        2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       UIS US         2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       UIS1 SW        2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EU      2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EU      2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GZ        2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNISYS CORP       USY1 QT        2,513.7    (1,270.8)     438.5
UNITI GROUP INC   CSALUSD EU     4,363.5    (1,187.3)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   0LJB LN        4,363.5    (1,187.3)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC GR         4,363.5    (1,187.3)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   UNIT US        4,363.5    (1,187.3)       -
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 GR         1,869.0      (226.0)     380.0
VALVOLINE INC     VVVEUR EU      1,869.0      (226.0)     380.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 QT         1,869.0      (226.0)     380.0
VALVOLINE INC     VVV US         1,869.0      (226.0)     380.0
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR US         1,299.1      (394.2)     167.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR GR         1,299.1      (394.2)     167.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGREUR EU      1,299.1      (394.2)     167.3
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR QT         1,299.1      (394.2)     167.3
VERISIGN INC      VRSN US        2,905.3    (1,234.7)     859.6
VERISIGN INC      VRS GR         2,905.3    (1,234.7)     859.6
VERISIGN INC      VRS TH         2,905.3    (1,234.7)     859.6
VERISIGN INC      VRSNEUR EU     2,905.3    (1,234.7)     859.6
VERISIGN INC      VRS GZ         2,905.3    (1,234.7)     859.6
VERISIGN INC      VRSN* MM       2,905.3    (1,234.7)     859.6
VERISIGN INC      VRS QT         2,905.3    (1,234.7)     859.6
W&T OFFSHORE INC  UWV GR           942.2      (544.6)     107.2
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI1EUR EU       942.2      (544.6)     107.2
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI US           942.2      (544.6)     107.2
WAYFAIR INC- A    W US           1,226.4      (127.2)      (2.8)
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF QT         1,226.4      (127.2)      (2.8)
WAYFAIR INC- A    WUSD EU        1,226.4      (127.2)      (2.8)
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF GR         1,226.4      (127.2)      (2.8)
WAYFAIR INC- A    1WF TH         1,226.4      (127.2)      (2.8)
WAYFAIR INC- A    WEUR EU        1,226.4      (127.2)      (2.8)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GR         1,307.1      (995.9)     (99.4)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTW US         1,307.1      (995.9)     (99.4)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWUSD EU      1,307.1      (995.9)     (99.4)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GZ         1,307.1      (995.9)     (99.4)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWEUR EU      1,307.1      (995.9)     (99.4)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 QT         1,307.1      (995.9)     (99.4)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 TH         1,307.1      (995.9)     (99.4)
WESTERN UNION     W3U TH         9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WESTERN UNION     WU* MM         9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WESTERN UNION     W3U GR         9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WESTERN UNION     WU US          9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WESTERN UNION     WUEUR EU       9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WESTERN UNION     W3U GZ         9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WESTERN UNION     0LVJ LN        9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WESTERN UNION     W3U QT         9,188.0      (375.8)  (1,032.2)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW US         2,165.0      (439.1)     (70.1)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 GR         2,165.0      (439.1)     (70.1)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW1EUR EU     2,165.0      (439.1)     (70.1)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 QT         2,165.0      (439.1)     (70.1)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  WIN US        10,981.3    (1,337.2)    (344.5)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  B4O2 TH       10,981.3    (1,337.2)    (344.5)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  B4O2 GR       10,981.3    (1,337.2)    (344.5)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  WIN2USD EU    10,981.3    (1,337.2)    (344.5)
WINDSTREAM HOLDI  B4O2 QT       10,981.3    (1,337.2)    (344.5)
WINGSTOP INC      WING1EUR EU      120.7      (146.5)      (5.4)
WINGSTOP INC      WING US          120.7      (146.5)      (5.4)
WINGSTOP INC      EWG GR           120.7      (146.5)      (5.4)
WINMARK CORP      WINA US           47.7       (28.6)       7.8
WINMARK CORP      GBZ GR            47.7       (28.6)       7.8
WORKIVA INC       WKEUR EU         178.6        (9.2)     (13.3)
WORKIVA INC       WK US            178.6        (9.2)     (13.3)
WORKIVA INC       0WKA GR          178.6        (9.2)     (13.3)
YELLOW PAGES LTD  YMI GR           581.0      (205.7)      72.7
YELLOW PAGES LTD  YEUR EU          581.0      (205.7)      72.7
YELLOW PAGES LTD  Y CN             581.0      (205.7)      72.7
YELLOW PAGES LTD  YLWDF US         581.0      (205.7)      72.7
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCW US        1,608.7      (365.9)     160.4
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 GR        1,608.7      (365.9)     160.4
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWUSD EU     1,608.7      (365.9)     160.4
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWEUR EU     1,608.7      (365.9)     160.4
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 QT        1,608.7      (365.9)     160.4
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 TH        1,608.7      (365.9)     160.4
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR TH         4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GR         4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GZ         4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   0QYD LN        4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD SW      4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD EU      4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM US         4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMEUR EU      4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR QT         4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM SW         4,836.0    (6,754.0)     780.0
ZYMEWORKS INC     ZYME US          132.0      (108.7)      77.7
ZYMEWORKS INC     ZYME CN          132.0      (108.7)      77.7


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman, Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000.

                   *** End of Transmission ***