TCR_Public/180104.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Thursday, January 4, 2018, Vol. 22, No. 3

                            Headlines

47 HOPS: Examiner Finds $2.5MM Transfer to A/R MacKinnon Account
9 HOUSTON: Court Rejects CC3's Objection to Sale of Houston Land
AMERICAN APPAREL: SG Agreements with D. Charney Enforceable
AMERICANN INC: Insufficient Cash Raises Going Concern Doubt
AVERY BRADLEY GREEN: Palm Avenue Seeks Appointment of Trustee

BEACH ELMWOOD: Court Confirms 1st Amended Plan
BEN BEATTY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 18
BRAVO MULTINATIONAL: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
BUILDERS HOLDING: Taps OR & Co. as Accountant
CAREFOCUS CORP: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 16

CARTER REESE: Court Narrows Claims in Suit vs Pook Defendants
CBK FUTURES: Selling Membership Interests in Hopkins Restaurant
CGG SA: US Court Recognizes Sanction Order of Safeguard Plan
CHAPELDALE PROPERTIES: Taps David W. Cohen as Legal Counsel
CHARMING CHARLIE: Unknown Recovery for Unsecureds Under Plan

CLUB VILLAGE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 9
CONDO 64: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Through Jan. 22
COOLWATER ESTATES: Taps Re/Max Platinum as Broker
CSA HOLDINGS: Thayer O'Neal Raises Going Concern Doubt
CUSTOM STONE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 18

DOCASA INC: Green & Company CPAs Casts Going Concern Doubt
EDWARD GREENE: Court OKs Bid to Waive Ombudsman Requirement
EMPIRE DIE: LM Insurance Not Obliged to Satisfy Judgment
EZRA HOLDINGS: Wants to Vote Its Interest in Eminent Offshore
FLO'S LLC: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Feb. 7

FREEDOM LEAF: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
FREEMAN GRADING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
FYNDERS INC: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 18
GALVESTON BAY: Oil & Gas Vendor Claim to be Paid in 12 Months
GANDER MOUNTAIN: Court Approves Outline of Liquidating Plan

GB SCIENCES: Recurring Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt
GENON ENERGY: Court Confirms 3rd Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan
GLOBAL AMENITIES: Legal Creditors to Get 100% Without Interest
GLOBAL AMENITIES: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 23
GROM SOCIAL ENTERPRISES: Insufficient Cash Cast Going Concern Doubt

GST AUTOLEATHER: Readying APA for Sale of All Assets
GUTIERREZ FURNITURE: Lone Star May Renew & Extend Debt
H MELTON VENTURES: DOJ Watchdog Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
HAHN HOTELS: Pilgrim Bank, et al., Oppose Approval of Plan Outline
HELIX TCS: Anticipated Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt

INCA REFINING: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 25
INDUSTRIE SERVICE: Jan. 23 Disclosure Statement Hearing
INMOBILIARIA LEGUISAMO: Plan Hearing Set for Jan. 25
INNERSCOPE HEARING: Capital Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
INPIXON: Working Capital Deficit Casts Going Concern Doubt

IRASEL SAND: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment in 20 Quarters
JANICE STEINER: Proposes Online Auction of Personal Property
JOHNS TRUCKING: Unsecureds to be Paid $1,000 Per Month for 36 Mos
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN: Accelerating Maturity Raises Going Concern Doubt
LECTRUS CORP:  $6-Million Credit Bid to Open March 7 Auction

LISA LORD: S.J. Zayler Appointed Chapter 11 Trustee
MACAVITY COMPANY: Jan. 30 Amended Plan Confirmation Hearing
MACK INDUSTRIES: Bid Deadline Set for January 12
MANN REALTY: Double M Can Proceed with State Litigation
MARICOPA RESOURCES: Trustee Taps PLS Inc. to Market Assets

MAYFAIR-HAWAII: Wesley Housing Buying DC Property for $75K
MOHDSAMEER ALJANEDI: Ombudsman Files First Interim Report
OPES HEALTH: Seeks to Hire A+ Accounting and Tax
PALADIN ENERGY: Files Chapter 11 Amended Liquidation Plan
PALLET PLUS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement

PANADERIA Y REPOSTERIA: Plan Hearing Set for Jan. 25
PEABODY ENERGY: Joplin Parties Bid to File Proofs of Claims Junked
PLEDGE PETROLEUM: Halt in Operations Raise Going Concern Doubt
PROVISION HOLDING: Maturing Debt Raises Going Concern Doubt
RENTECH INC: Selling WP Subsidiaries' Assets for $61 Million

RINGWOOD PROPERTIES: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 9
ROYAL COACHMAN: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on March 8
SANSAL WELLNESS: Recurring Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt
SERENITY HOMECARE: Ombudsman Files 1st Report
SILO CITY: Unsecureds to be Paid $13,500 Per Month Over 5 Years

SOLAT LLC: Taps Mike Caldwell as Accountant
SPORTS ZONE: New Legacy Buying 10 Remaining Stores for $900K
STRINGER FARMS: Unsecureds Estimated to Recover 33% of Claims
SUNEDISON INC: Exits Chapter 11 Restructuring
TEXAS PELLETS: Must Tender Additional Payment of $125K to JBI

TEXDOM INVESTMENTS: Taps Kurt Stephen as Legal Counsel
TITAN ENERGY: Covenant Problems Raise Going Concern Doubt
TRIMUR PARTNERS: Case Summary & List of Unsecured Creditors
V. CRUZ MD: Seeks to Hire A+ Accounting and Tax
VILLA PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors

WALTER INVESTMENTS: Stock Transfer Protocol Has Interim Approval
WORCESTER RE: Unsecureds to Recoup 2% Under Proposed Plan
[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings

                            *********

47 HOPS: Examiner Finds $2.5MM Transfer to A/R MacKinnon Account
----------------------------------------------------------------
Marcia A. Frey, Chapter 11 Examiner for the bankruptcy estate of 47
Hops LLC, files with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Washington, a report on the Debtor's assets and
liabilities.

The Examiner relates that the Debtor engaged Alegria & Co. PS -- a
CPA firm -- in June 2017, just before its bankruptcy filing and
currently uses its services.  Alegria reports that it has been
reviewing and reconciling the Debtor's QuickBooks accounting files
since its initial engagement, and has made adjusting entries to the
Debtor's accounting records based on its review. The Debtor has
tasked Alegria with review and reconciliation of QuickBooks
accounting entries for year-to-date 2017 and year-end 2016. Alegria
is working closely with current office staff of the Debtor to
maintain and update Debtor's accounting until Debtor is ready to
turn over its daily accounting operations to a yet-to-be-hired
in-house bookkeeper.

The Examiner tells the Court that she has been in contact with
Alegria regarding its continuing efforts to reconcile the Debtor's
records, but has not duplicated those efforts to audit or re-state
Debtor's QuickBooks records.

The Examiner Order directs Examiner to review the Debtor's books,
records and record-keeping processes, and, with respect to the time
period from January 1, 2015 to the present, to report to Columbia
Bank upon (i) the sources and uses of revenue generated by the
Debtor.

The Examiner has reviewed the Debtor's QuickBooks account reports
for the account entitled A/R Douglas MacKinnon and the account
entitled Owner’s Capital/Draws. The Examiner finds that before
2015, the Debtor utilized QuickBooks accounts entitled
"Intercompany Transfers" to record affiliate transfers. In 2015,
the Debtor discontinued this practice, and outstanding balances in
the Intercompany Transfers account were transferred to the A/R
MacKinnon account.

The Examiner also finds that A/R MacKinnon account was utilized to
reflect funds used by MacKinnon for purposes other than Debtor's
ordinary course expenses. The Examiner assumes that, given the fact
that Debtor classified this account as a receivable from MacKinnon,
the Debtor expected that MacKinnon would repay these amounts to
Debtor. However, the Examiner has not identified any formal
documentation of the debt, such as promissory notes from MacKinnon
to Debtor.

When Examiner reviewed the A/R MacKinnon account, she has
categorized each transaction as (i) for the benefit of an
affiliated party or (ii) for the benefit of MacKinnon, as follows:

          Affiliate                        Net Transfers
          Name                             from Debtor
          =========                        ===========
      MacKinnon Holdings LLC               $1,735,437
      MacKinnon Farms LLC                     $15,647
      NHWE                                    $12,428
      Aecetia                                 $35,433
      Darba                                      $571
      Schmingledorf                            $2,144
      Trails End                            ($136,158)
      MacKinnon Industries                   $106,580
      MacKara                                     $95
      NWP                                     $10,000
      D MacKinnon Unclassified               $697,449
                                           ===========  
      Total Transfers (Net)                $2,479,627

The Examiner discovers an important transfer to note involves the
proceeds of a $2,300,000 loan from Columbia Bank to MacKinnon
Holdings LLC (the "Warehouse Loan") to provide term funding for
construction costs for MacKinnon Holdings LLC warehouse facilities.
MacKinnon asserted to the Examiner that the Warehouse Loan proceeds
were not properly recorded by the Debtor. MacKinnon also asserted
that if the Warehouse Loan proceeds had been properly recorded, the
account receivable owing from MacKinnon to the Debtor would be
reduced.

As such, the Examiner has concluded that the Warehouse Loan
proceeds were in fact credited to the A/R MacKinnon account and, in
turn, the net amount transferred from the Debtor to MacKinnon
Holdings LLC was already properly reduced. The Draws account from
January 1, 2015 to October 30, 2017 identified draws totaling
$1,061,935. Draws occurred primarily in 2017 and included a draw of
$785,000, which was identified as 2016 taxes.

The Examiner ascertains that there are no other funds loaned
directly or indirectly to Debtor’s affiliates other than these
transactions.

The Examiner describes that the Debtor's inventory consists of many
different varieties of hops purchased from several grower sources
-- current inventory contains 50+ varieties of hops. Since the
beginning of the year, the Debtor has used an inventory program,
Ecounts, to track and value its product held in inventory. The
Debtor reports ongoing efforts to best utilize the program and move
toward a bar coding system that will enable tracking of specific
product to sales transactions, for this will accomplish more
accurate inventory values and profit margins. Examiner believes
that the Debtor will achieve this improved tracking by first
quarter 2018.

The Examiner's findings are based on her interviews and subsequent
phone and email correspondence with the President of the Debtor,
Doug MacKinnon; the Debtor's office administrator Cara Archer; Ken
Meissner CPA of Alegria & Co. PS, the Debtor's outside CPA firm,
and staff accountant at Alegria, Melanie Swanson. The Examiner
obtained direct access to, and reviewed, Debtor's QuickBooks
accounting files and Debtor's inventory reporting program, Ecounts.


A full-text copy of the Examiner's Report, dated November 29, 2017,
is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/waeb17-02440-170.pdf

                       About 47 Hops LLC

Based in Yakima, Washington, 47 Hops LLC -- https://47hops.com/ --
sells aroma and alpha hops to breweries in 38 countries around the
world.

47 Hops LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No. 17-02440) on Aug. 11, 2017.
Douglas MacKinnon, its president, signed the petition. At the time
of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $4.3 million in assets and
$7.45 million in liabilities.

Judge Frank L. Kurtz presides over the case.

Catherine J Reny, Esq., and Nathan T. Riordan, Esq., at Wenokur
Riordan PLLC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The official committee of unsecured creditors tapped Cairncross &
Hempelmann, P.S., as counsel.

Marcia A. Frey, the examiner of 47 Hops LLC, hired Hillis Clark
Martin & Peterson P.S., as counsel.


9 HOUSTON: Court Rejects CC3's Objection to Sale of Houston Land
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jeff Bohm of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas granted Debtor 9 Houston LLC's Emergency motion
to sell approximately 3.378 acres of land located in Houston,
Harris County, Texas free and clear of all liens, claims,
encumbrances, and other interests.

On Nov. 29, 2017, CC3 filed its amended limited objection to the
motion. On Nov. 30, 2017, the Debtor supplemented the motion
describing why the Court should consider the relief requested by
the Debtor on an emergency basis. Finally, on Dec. 6, 2017, CC3
filed an amended objection to the motion.

Although CC3 vehemently opposes the motion, CC3 agrees with the
Debtor on one issue, the case that governs this dispute is
Institutional Creditors of Cont'l Air Lines, Inc. v. Cont'l Air
Lines, Inc. In this case, the Fifth Circuit held that a sale of
estate property outside the ordinary course of business is
allowable but not simply because a debtor requests approval.
Rather, the debtor must articulate a sound business reason for the
proposed sale and prove that the sale is in the best interest of
the estate.

Continental Airlines also holds that in determining whether the
debtor's business justification is sufficient, the Court should
consider all salient factors pertaining to the proceeding and
accordingly, act to further the diverse interests of the debtor,
creditors and equity holders alike. He might, for example, look to
such relevant factors as the proportionate value of the asset to
the estate as a whole, the amount of elapsed time since the filing,
the likelihood that a plan of reorganization will be proposed and
confirmed in the near future, the effect of the proposed
disposition on future plans of reorganization, the proceeds to be
obtained from the disposition vis-a-vis any appraisals of the
property, which of the alternatives of use, sale or lease the
proposal envisions and, most importantly perhaps, whether the asset
is increasing or decreasing in value.

The Court also took into consideration the factors articulated in
In re Gulf Coast Oil Corp., including evidence of a need for speed,
whether the Debtor facilitated competitive bidding, and whether the
property has been aggressively marketed.

Analysis of the Continental and Gulf Coast factors overwhelmingly
indicates that the Debtor has met its burden to show that the
proposed sale of the property to Martin Fein Interests, Ltd for
$19,865,000 is entirely appropriate and in the best interests of
the state. The Court, therefore, grants the motion.

The Court also finds it telling that CC3's representative stated
that a major reason that CC3 opposes the motion is that it
typically only extends financing for no more than two years. This
is a hardly convincing basis for opposing the motion. The very
nature of the Chapter 11 process includes stretching out repayment
loans. Nor does the fact that the Debtor has not made a payment to
CC3 since April of this year provide a sound basis for objecting to
the motion. Whether CC3 likes it or not, it is the envy of most
secured creditors throughout the country insofar as there is
substantial equity in CC3's collateral. This fact, combined with
the fact that the chances of MFI closing on the sale of the
Property are very high, means that it is very likely that in 2018,
CC3 will be paid in full. By granting the motion, the Court
believes that the chances of the Debtor paying not only CC3 in full
but all creditors in full are maximized.

A full-text copy of Judge Bohm's Dec. 20, 2017 Memorandum Opinion
is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-35614-41.pdf

                       About 9 Houston LLC

9 Houston LLC owns a fee-simple interest in 5.396 acres of land
located at 1317 Post Oak Park Drive, Houston, Texas, valued at
$29.39 million.  It is a single asset real estate (as defined in 11
U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

9 Houston LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-35614) on Sept. 30, 2017.  David
Schmidt, its manager, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $29.39 million in
assets and $18.65 million in liabilities.  

Judge Jeff Bohm presides over the case.

Jarrod Martin, Esq., at Nathan Sommers Jacobs, in Houston, Texas,
serves as counsel to the Debtor.

The Debtor tapped Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc., as the real
estate brokerage firm and the firm's Simmi Jaggi as the listing
agent.


AMERICAN APPAREL: SG Agreements with D. Charney Enforceable
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned STANDARD GENERAL L.P., STANDARD GENERAL
MASTER FUND L.P., P STANDARD GENERAL LTD., Plaintiffs, v. DOV
CHARNEY, Defendant, C.A. No. 11287-CB (Del. Ch.), the Delaware
Court of Chancery entered a judgment in favor of Standard General.

In June 2014, the board of directors of American Apparel, Inc.,
suspended its founder, Dov Charney, from his position as Chief
Executive Officer for alleged misconduct. Hoping to take control of
the Company, Charney teamed up with Standard General, an investment
firm. Charney borrowed approximately $20 million from Standard
General to increase his holdings to close to 43% of the Company's
outstanding shares in contemplation of running a proxy contest to
replace the board that suspended him.

In July 2014, after the Company fought back, Charney, Standard
General, and American Apparel entered into a "Standstill
Agreement." The Standstill Agreement reconstituted the board of
American Apparel, established a process for a committee of the new
board called the Suitability Committee to investigate Charney's
alleged misconduct and decide whether he would return as CEO, and
documented Standard General's commitment to invest up to $25
million in the Company. Charney and Standard General entered into a
series of other agreements that, together with the Standstill
Agreement, define the terms of their relationship.

In December 2014, the Suitability Committee voted against
reinstating Charney, and its new board terminated his employment
for cause. Over the course of the next year, the parties became
embroiled in litigation in multiple forums and American Apparel
filed for bankruptcy. Standard General filed this action in July
2015, a few weeks after Charney filed suit in California asserting
that the Agreements were invalid and unenforceable.

Before the Court is Standard General's motion for judgment on the
pleadings for a declaration that the Agreements were valid and
enforceable when entered into, and an award of damages for amounts
due under the loan it made to Charney. In defending this action,
Charney made a deliberate choice not to assert any counterclaims
but has asserted a kitchen sink of eleven affirmative defenses.
Charney's primary defense is that Standard General made certain
oral promises to him that were false, which fraudulently induced
him to enter into the Agreements.

Standard General's complaint in this action asserts four claims.
Count I seeks a declaratory judgment that the Agreements are valid
and enforceable against Charney and that an event of default has
occurred under the Notes, making them due and payable. Count II
seeks damages and other relief for Charney's alleged breaches of
various provisions of the Agreements. Count III seeks an injunction
to enjoin Charney from taking certain actions to impair the Notes'
collateral on the theory that Charney breached the implied covenant
of good faith and fair dealing inherent in the Agreements. Count IV
seeks damages and injunctive relief for impairment of the
collateral for the Notes.

After a thorough analysis, the Court concludes that Charney could
not have reasonably relied on any of these alleged false promises
because they directly conflict with the terms of the eight written
Agreements he signed, and that his other affirmative defenses fail
as a matter of law and undisputed fact. Accordingly, Standard
General is entitled to entry of judgment on the pleadings.

Standard General is entitled under Count I of its complaint to a
declaratory judgment that the Agreements were valid and enforceable
when they were executed and, under Count II of its complaint, to a
judgment in its favor for the principal amount of the Notes and
accrued interest. Counts III and IV of the complaint are moot.

A full-text copy of the Court's Decision dated Dec. 19, 2017 is
available at https://is.gd/Kb6StO from Leagle.com.

Raymond J. DiCamillo -- dicamillo@rlf.com -- & Matthew D. Perri --
perri@rlf.com -- RICHARDS, LAYTON & FINGER, P.A., Wilmington,
Delaware; Shannon Rose Selden -- srselden@debevoise.com -- Derek
Wikstrom -- dwikstrom@debevoise.com -- & Justin Horton --
jhorton@debevoise.com -- DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP, New York, New
York; Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Mark M. Billion, BILLION LAW, Wilmington, Delaware; Attorney for
Defendant.

                      About American Apparel

American Apparel Inc. was one of the largest apparel manufacturers
in North America, employing 4,700 employees across 3 active
manufacturing facilities, one distribution facility and
approximately 110 retail stores in the United States.

American Apparel and its affiliates filed for chapter 11 protection
in October 2015, confirmed a fully consensual plan of
reorganization in January 2016, and substantially consummated that
plan on Feb. 5, 2016.  Unfortunately, the business turnaround plan
upon which the Debtors' plan of reorganization was premised
failed.

American Apparel LLC, n/k/a APP Windown, LLC, along with five of
its affiliates, again sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. D. Del.
Lead Case No. 16-12551) on Nov. 14, 2016, with a deal to sell the
assets.  The petitions were signed by Bennett L. Nussbaum, chief
financial officer.

As of the bankruptcy filing, the Debtors estimated assets and
liabilities in the range of $100 million to $500 million each.  As
of the Petition Date, the Debtors had outstanding debt in the
aggregate principal amount of approximately $215 million under
their prepetition credit facility.  Additionally, the Debtors have
guaranteed one of its United Kingdom subsidiaries' obligations
under a $15 million unsecured note due Oct. 15, 2020, according to
court document.

The Debtors have hired Laura Davis Jones, Esq. and James E.
O'Neill, Esq., at Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as counsel;
Erin N. Brady, Esq., Scott J. Greenberg, Esq., and Michael J.
Cohen, Esq., at Jones Day as co-counsel; Berkeley Research Group,
LLC as financial advisors; Houlihan Lokey as investment banker; and
Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by
lawyers at Bayard P.A. and Cooley LLP.

In early 2017, the Debtors succeeded in selling their intellectual
property and certain of their wholesale assets to Gildan Activewear
SRL for approximately $100 million.  The Court approved the Sale on
Jan. 12, 2017, and the Sale closed on Feb. 8, 2017.

On Feb. 9, 2017, in accordance with the closing of the Sale and the
Sale Order, the Debtors filed appropriate documentation to change
their names as:

      New Name                     Former Name
      --------                     -----------
  APP Winddown, LLC             American Apparel, LLC
  APP USA Winddown, LLC         American Apparel (USA), LLC
  APP Retail Winddown, Inc.     American Apparel Retail, Inc.
  APP D&F Winddown, Inc.        American Apparel Dyeing &
                                    Finishing, Inc.
  APP Knitting Winddown, LLC    KCL Knitting, LLC
  APP Shipping Winddown, Inc.   Fresh Air Freight, Inc.


AMERICANN INC: Insufficient Cash Raises Going Concern Doubt
-----------------------------------------------------------
AmeriCann, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net loss of
$2,771,894 on $40,000 of total revenues for the year ended
September 30, 2017, compared to a net loss of $2,210,764 on $60,000
of total revenues for the year ended in 2016.

The Company's balance sheet at September 30, 2017, showed total
assets of $6.06 million, total  liabilities of $3.78 million, and a
total stockholders' equity of $2.28 million.

The Company had an accumulated deficit of $8,676,825 and $5,904,931
at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and had a net loss of
$2,771,894 for the year ended September 30, 2017. Further, the
amount due from WGP of $1,250,014 (before an allowance of $469,699)
may not be collectible.  These matters, among others, raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.  While the Company is attempting to increase
operations and generate additional revenues, the Company's cash
position may not be significant enough to support the Company's
daily operations.  Management intends to raise additional funds
through the sale of its securities.  The Company filed a Demand for
Arbitration against WGP on April 7, 2017.  The arbitration hearing
is scheduled to begin on January 8, 2018.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:
                              
                       https://is.gd/B1Dlmr

                       About AmeriCann, Inc.

AmeriCann, Inc., provides various services to the regulated
cannabis industry worldwide.  The company offers real estate
development, research, consulting, and capital to the medical
marijuana industry.  It is also involved in the design and
construction of indoor cultivation and greenhouse facilities;
operation of cultivation facility; and provision of license
procurement services.  The company was formerly known as Nevada
Health Scan, Inc. and changed its name to AmeriCann, Inc. in
February 2014.  AmeriCann, Inc. was founded in 2010 and is based in
Denver, Colorado.



AVERY BRADLEY GREEN: Palm Avenue Seeks Appointment of Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------------
Palm Avenue Hialeah Trust, for and on behalf of and solely with
respect to Palm Avenue Hialeah Trust, Series 2014-1, asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina for an
order directing the appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee, or in the
alternative, converting the case of Avery Bradley Green to a case
under Chapter 7.

Palm Avenue asserts that the Debtor does not have sufficient
integrity to be trusted by the Court, creditors or the estate for
these various issues/actions:

     (a) The Debtor withdrew, without authority, in excess of
$50,000 from the account of Zeddie B. Green after her death and
before the petition date -- the taking of these funds has not been
disclosed or returned to the Estate of Zeddie B. Green.

     (b) The Debtor has failed to list all of the real property in
which he has an interest.

     (c) The Debtor has failed to list his interest in Green Family
Properties, Inc. which owns real property in Caswell County, North
Carolina.

     (d) The Debtor has failed to insure all of the real property
for loss or casualty and liability, as well as to provide
documentation evidencing such insurance to the Bankruptcy
Administrator.

     (e) The Debtor has entered into a joint venture or partnership
with William "Billy" Adams to improve and manage the real property
located at 1165 West Parkton Tobemary Road, Parkton, which was
known as the Green Manor Rest Home, Inc.

     (f) Palm Avenue believes that the Debtor and/or Mr. Adams have
entered into an agreement to operate the Green Manor Facility with
or to lease the real property to Carolina Transitional Services,
Inc. so as to operate a treatment or youth facility at the Green
Manor Facility, and there are now currently 26 or more living in
this facility. The Debtor has not obtained casualty or general
liability insurance should any act happen post-petition that could
cause liability to this Estate.  

     (g) Palm Avenue believes that tenants reside in on or more
improved tracts of real property other than the Green Manor
Facility and the Debtor may be receiving rent from these tenants.

     (h) The Debtor and Mr. Adams have incurred loans in excess of
$250,000 post-petition, without authority from the Court or notice
to creditors, which amount Palm Avenue believes may be priority
claims in the Estate.

     (i) Palm Avenue is the owner of a Note, Deed of Trust,
Assignment of Leases and Rents and other related documents. The
Deed of Trust granted Palm Avenue a lien on all rents and profits
generated by the Green Manor Facility which are cash collateral --
which Palm Avenue believes are being utilized or depleted without
authority of the Court.

     (j) The Debtor is receiving income from various sources --
which Palm Avenue maintains as property of the Estate. Further,
Palm Avenue believes that the Debtor is using said income without
authority of the Court and that the Debtor did the sought approval
to pay ordinary living expenses.

     (k) The Debtor has not filed a federal or state tax return
since 2015 and currently is delinquent for filing for the year
2016. Furthermore, the 2016 federal income tax return was due after
the petition date and a satisfactory explanation has not been given
for the delay in filing the return.

     (l) The Debtor just filed monthly operating reports timely as
required by the Chapter 11 Operating Order.

     (m) The Debtor just opened post-petition accounts although the
Debtor has obtained income and may be escrowing funds for taxes.

     (n) The Debtor and Mr. Adams have started improving and
refurbishing the real property at Hwy. 301, Parkton, NC and
incurring costs and expenses post-petition without authority of the
Court.

     (o) The Debtor previously testified at the first status
conference that the Green Manor Facility had not been leased and
that he would seek authority from the Court before doing so. At the
second status conference, the Debtor testified that he had leased
the Green Manor Facility and was generating income from the same.

     (p) The Debtor has not honored his fiduciary duty to the
creditors in this case or the Estate, and has been opaque, at best,
as to his business dealings involving the real property located in
Parkton – he appears to be acting for his own interests and not
to preserve the property of the Estate.

Given these various issues, Palm Avenue believes that the
appointment of a Trustee would be in the interests of creditors,
the Department of Health and Human Services, the Internal Revenue
Service and the Estate. Certainly, for investors and creditors
seeking transparency and financial accountability of the Debtor,
Palm Avenue asserts that it would be in the best interests of
creditors and seemingly defrauded creditors -- who extended credit
to the Debtor post-petition -- for an independent fiduciary to be
appointed as soon as possible.

Palm Avenue Hialeah Trust is represented by:

            William Walt Pettit, Esq.
            Hutchens Law Firm
            6230 Fairview Road, Suite 315
            Charlotte, N.C. 28210
            Telephone: (704) 362-9255
            Telecopier: (704) 362-9272
            Email: walt.pettit@hutchenslawfirm.com

Avery Bradley Green filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D.N.C.
Case No. 17-11043), on September 15, 2017. The Debtor is
represented by Phillip E. Bolton, Esq.


BEACH ELMWOOD: Court Confirms 1st Amended Plan
----------------------------------------------
Judge Michael J. Kaplan of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of New York on Dec. 18, 2017, issued an order
confirming the Chapter 11 First Amended Plan of Reorganization
filed by Beach Elmwood Properties LLC.  The Court approved the
disclosure statement explaining the Debtor's Plan on Sept. 22,
2017.

Beach Elmwood Properties LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-12122) on October 18, 2016,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by James M. Joyce, Esq.


BEN BEATTY: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 18
--------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama is
set to hold a hearing on Jan. 18, 2018, at 9:35 a.m., to consider
approval of the disclosure statement, which explains the Chapter 11
plan of Ben Beatty Custom Homes LLC.

The hearing will take place at 113 U.S. Courthouse.  Objections are
due by Jan. 4, 2018.

                 About Ben Beatty Custom Homes LLC

Beatty Custom Homes LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 17-41009) on May 31, 2017, listing under
$100,000 in assets and under $500,000 in liabilities.  Beatty
Custom is in the residential building construction business.


BRAVO MULTINATIONAL: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bravo Multinational Incorporated filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $131,699 on $564,478 of total
revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared
with a net loss of $391,831 on $nil of total revenue for the same
period in 2016.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $4,027,165,
total liabilities of $3,518,178, and a $508,987 in total
stockholders' equity.

As of September 30, 2017, the registrant had an accumulated deficit
of $26,557,888.  These factors raise substantial doubt about the
registrant's ability to continue as a going concern.

While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate
revenues, its cash position may not be significant enough to
support its daily operations.  Management intends to raise
additional funds by way of an offering of its securities.
Management believes that the actions presently being taken to
implement its business plan further and generate revenues will
improve the Company's operating results.  While the Company
believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues and
in its ability to raise additional funds, it may not be successful.
The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent
upon its capability to implement its business plan further and
generate revenues.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/g8X8KT

                 About Bravo Multinational Inc.

Bravo Multinational Incorporated, formerly GoldLand Holdings Co.,
is engaged in the business of leasing of gaming equipment.  The
Company has gaming operations in two markets: Central and South
America.  The Company's gaming equipment includes approximately 70
video poker and slot machines; over eight blackjack and
miscellaneous game tables, and related furniture and equipment;
roulette table and related furniture and equipment, and bingo
equipment and furniture.


BUILDERS HOLDING: Taps OR & Co. as Accountant
---------------------------------------------
Builders Holding Co Corp. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Puerto Rico to hire OR & Co., CPA as its
accountant.

The firm will provide special accounting services to the Debtor in
connection with its Chapter 11 case.

Ovidio Ruiz, the accountant designated to provide the services,
disclosed in a court filing that he and other members of his firm,
are "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Ovidio Ruiz
     OR & Co., CPA
     P.O. Box 3266
     Carolina, PR 00957
     Email: orcocpa@gmail.com

                   About Builders Holding Co.

Builders Holding Co., Corp. sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-06643) on August 20,
2016.  The petition was signed by Ismael Carrasquillo Sanchez,
president.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $9.72
million in assets and $10.53 million in liabilities.

Judge Edward A. Godoy presides over the case.

Fausto David Godreau, Esq., at Godreau & Gonzales Law, is the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Monge Robertin &
Asociados, Inc. as insolvency and restructuring advisor; and Rivera
Colon & Associated Co. as external auditor.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.


CAREFOCUS CORP: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 16
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for
CareFocus Corporation at a hearing on Jan. 16.

The hearing will be held at 2:00 p.m., at Courtroom 2B.

The court will also consider at the hearing final approval of the
company's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
Dec. 12, 2017.

Under the proposed plan, CareFocus will pay all Class 2 general
unsecured claims 10% on the effective date of the plan.  The
company believes the only unsecured claim is held by the Internal
Revenue Service, which is in the amount of $96,246.05.

CareFocus is pursuing a plan to continue its business operations
subsequent to approval of the plan.  It anticipates no adverse tax
consequences as a result of the court confirming the plan.  During
the course of its bankruptcy case, the company has been paying to
the IRS the sum of $1,046.15 per month, according to its disclosure
statement.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/mnb17-32654-59.pdf

                      About CareFocus

CareFocus Corporation was incorporated on May 6, 1999, and has been
in the home health care business for the past 14 years.  It acts as
a home health care service and operates from 2429 University Avenue
West, St. Paul, Minnesota.

CareFocus Corporation filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 17-32654) on Aug. 18, 2017.  Steven B.
Nosek, Esq., at Steven B. Nosek, PA, serves as its bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities below $1
million.


CARTER REESE: Court Narrows Claims in Suit vs Pook Defendants
-------------------------------------------------------------
The adversary proceeding captioned CARTER P. and SARAH REESE
(HUSBAND AND WIFE), Plaintiffs, v. POOK & POOK, LLC, et al.,
Defendants, Civil Action No. 14-5715 (E.D. Pa.), is an action for
damages and injunctive relief brought by husband and wife Carter
and Sarah Reese against several defendants alleging various state
law claims stemming from the auction of part of the Reeses' antique
toy collection.

The Pook Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss claiming that
the court has no jurisdiction over these state claims because there
is no diversity of citizenship among the parties. The motion is
also brought for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted. District Judge Lawrence F. Stengel grants the motion in
part and denies it in part.

In the Reeses' second amended complaint, they brought claims for
Civil Conspiracy/Combination in Count I, breach of fiduciary
duty/responsibility in Count II, negligence in Count III, breach of
the contractual duty of good faith and fair dealing, and dishonesty
in fact in Count IV, and unjust enrichment in Count V.

The Pook Defendants seek the dismissal of the second amended
complaint arguing that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
They maintain that no federal claims are presented, there is no
federal question, and the parties are not diverse. In fact, all
parties are citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The
defendants also argue that this court should decline to exercise
supplemental jurisdiction over the Reeses' state-law claims. The
plaintiffs insist that 28 U.S.C. section 1334(b) provides this
court with jurisdiction. The Court agrees and finds that 28 U.S.C.
section 1334(b) provides the court with subject matter
jurisdiction, and that the case is properly before the Court.

Next, in arguing that the action should be dismissed for failure to
state a claim, the defendants contend that the claims of civil
conspiracy (Count I), breach of fiduciary duty (Count II), and
negligence (Count III) are barred by a two-year statute of
limitations. The statute of limitations begins to run from the time
the cause of action accrues. A cause of action accrues when the
injury is inflicted. Thus, the defendants argue, when this second
amended complaint was filed on Feb. 22, 2017, the statute of
limitations had run because the toy auction occurred on Sept. 6 and
7, 2013. They argue that the second amended complaint must be
dismissed as untimely because it cannot refer back to the original
complaint under these circumstances. The Court disagrees.

The second amended complaint alleges that "Pook, Caffarella, and
Lowe jointly benefited, and continue to benefit, from exploitation
Plaintiffs [sic] as outlined above." It continues, "Plaintiffs have
conferred upon Defendants economic opportunity and actual economic
benefit, in the nature of profits resulting from unlawful auction
practices and other conduct described above, to the economic
detriment of Plaintiffs." The Pook Defendants argue that this claim
is plainly meritless. The Court agrees.

As the Pook Defendants properly argue, the Reeses have not alleged
that they conferred a benefit upon the Pook Defendants without
receiving value in return. Instead, they have alleged that they
entered into a written agreement for the toy auction and received
the benefit of $560,000 in sales. There is no allegation that the
Pook Defendants were somehow enriched beyond the amount to which
they were entitled in their agreement with the Reeses. Accordingly,
the Court grants the Pook Defendants' motion to dismiss Count V, as
it relates to them only.

The Court's Dec. 19, 2017 Memorandum is available at
https://is.gd/PuXNZW from Leagle.com.

CARTER P. REESE, Plaintiff, represented by JOSEPH A. O'KEEFE,
O'KEEFE, MILLER & THIELEN, P.C.

CARTER P. REESE, Plaintiff, represented by FRANCIS J. FARINA.

SARAH REESE, (HUSBAND & WIFE), Plaintiff, represented by JOSEPH A.
O'KEEFE, O'KEEFE, MILLER & THIELEN, P.C. & FRANCIS J. FARINA.

POOK & POOK, LLC, Defendant, represented by DAVID J. SHANNON --
djshannon@mdwcg.com -- MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN,pc
& JONATHON E. CROSS -- jecross@mdwcg.com -- MARSHALL DENNEHEY
WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN.

RON POOK, Defendant, represented by DAVID J. SHANNON, MARSHALL
DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN,pc & JONATHON E. CROSS, MARSHALL
DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN.

DEBRA POOK, Defendant, represented by DAVID J. SHANNON, MARSHALL
DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN,pc & JONATHON E. CROSS, MARSHALL
DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN.

JAMES POOK, Defendant, represented by DAVID J. SHANNON, MARSHALL
DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN,pc & JONATHON E. CROSS, MARSHALL
DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN.

CONNIE & JAY LOWE ANTIQUES, Defendant, represented by MARK E.
LOVETT, BRUBAKER CONNAUGHTON GOSS & LUCARELLI LLC.

MIKE CAFFARELLA, Defendant, represented by JOHN L. SENFT, SENTFT
LAW FIRM, LLC.

JAY LOWE, Defendant, represented by MARK E. LOVETT, BRUBAKER
CONNAUGHTON GOSS & LUCARELLI LLC.

Carter P. Reese and Sarah C. Reese filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
(Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 12-19376) on Oct. 2, 2012.


CBK FUTURES: Selling Membership Interests in Hopkins Restaurant
---------------------------------------------------------------
CBK Futures, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Ohio to authorize the private sale of its Class B
membership rights in Hopkins Restaurant Services, LLC, as same
relate to Burger King No. 21752, to Restaurant Systems Co., LLC for
$3,500, subject to higher and better offers.

The Debtor operates eight stand-alone Burger King restaurants
situated in Cuyahoga County (Parma Heights, Garfield Heights, Seven
Hills, Middleburg Heights, and Brook Park)1, Lorain County, Ohio
(Elyria and Sheffield Village) and Erie County (Sandusky).  It also
operates one EB-5 direct investment restaurant located in
Cleveland, near to Cleveland Hopkins International Airport, in
which CBK is the 25% owner and managing partner.  The Membership
Interests the Debtor proposes to sell to the Buyer are related to
the EB-5 Location.

In evaluating its options, including the cessation of financial
support from Unique Ventures Group, LLC, which is the 95% equity
holder of the Debtor, the Debtor realized that a sale of its assets
to a purchaser prepared to take on the capital and operational
requirements from, and meeting the qualifications of, Burger King
was its only option to preserve jobs and opportunities for vendors
and business partners.  It determined that such a sale would need
to be pursuant to the relief afforded in the Bankruptcy Code,
namely the ability to sell assets free and clear of liens and
encumbrances.

Beginning in July of 2017, CBK began a wide marketing process to
locate and secure a purchaser and/or stalking-horse bidder for its
assets, including the assets of the Stand-Alone Locations and the
Membership Interests in the EB-5 Location.  Following thorough
vetting and exploratory process, covering more than 100 days and
virtually every contact CBK and its counsel could reasonably
consider, TOMS King (Ohio II), LLC came forward as the only party
willing to serve as both the stalking horse bidder (for the assets
of the Stand-Alone Locations) and as the Debtor's DIP lender.

Based on the steps taken by the Debtor, on the Petition Date, the
Debtor filed its Sale Procedures Motion.  Pursuant to the Sale
Procedures Motion, since granted, the Debtor wants to sell the
assets of the Stand-Alone Locations to TOMS King, with a hearing on
such proposed sale scheduled for Jan. 9, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.  The
proposed sale to TOMS King does not include the Membership
Interests in the EB-5 Location.

The Buyer is only interested in purchasing the Membership Interests
in the EB-5 Location, and not the assets of the Stand-Alone
Locations.  As such, the Buyer's proposal will not interfere with,
or disturb in any manner, the Debtor's sale of the assets of the
Stand-Alone Locations to TOMS King, should the Court approves such
sale.  The Debtor and its counsel have determined that the Buyer's
offer to purchase the Membership Interests pursuant to the terms
contained in the LOI constitutes the highest and best offer at this
time, and provides the best opportunity for Debtor to realize the
greatest return on the Membership Interests.

The material terms of the proposal are:

     a. Purchase Price: $3,500, free and clear of any and all
liens, claims, interests and encumbrances

     b. Good Faith Deposit: Within three business days of full
execution of the LOI, the Buyer will deposit with the Debtor's
counsel the Buyer's good faith deposit of $350 which will be
applied to the Purchase Price.

     c. Membership Interests: The Buyer will purchase the Debtor's
Class B membership rights in Hopkins Restaurant Services, LLC, as
same relate to Burger King No. 21752.

     d. Assumed and Assigned Contracts: The Debtor will assume, and
thereafter assign to the Buyer, all its rights and obligations, if
any, related to the Operating Agreement and Management Agreement by
and between it and the Buyer.

     e. Private Sale: The transaction contemplated is a private
sale, but subject to the Debtor's rights pursuant to its fiduciary
duties to consider higher and better offers for the Membership
Interests.

A copy of the LOI attached to the Motion is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/CBK_Futures_86_Sales.pdf

Pursuant to Sections 365(a), (b) and (f), but conditioned on the
closing of the Sale, the Debtor asks entry of an order approving
its assumption and assignment to the Buyer (or any other party who
may come forth with a higher and better offer for the Membership
Interests) of certain assumed liabilities/executory contracts, at
the el ection of such party.  The Debtor will ask the cure of any
defaults under the Assumed Contracts that are actually assumed at
or before Closing.

Although it expects, subject to the Court's approval, to consummate
the proposed transaction with the Buyer, the Debtor has a duty to
the estate to consider higher and better offers for the Membership
Interests prior to any scheduled hearing before the Court on the
Motion.  To conserve the resources of all parties involved, it is
requiring that any other party interested in making a bid for the
Membership Interests do so by Jan. 5, 2018.  Any party making such
bid must make an offer that is (i) non-contingent; made in cash
with a 10% deposit received by the Debtor prior to the hearing on
the Motion; and based on the form of binding LOI submitted with the
Motion.  It reserves the right to hold an auction for the
Membership Interests if another bid is timely received.

The Debtor has every expectation that it will be in a position to
close the proposed transaction as soon as possible after entry of
an order on the Motion.  Accordingly, it respectfully asks that the
Court waives the 14-day stay period under Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d)
in this instance.

                      About CBK Futures

CBK Futures, Inc. is a privately-held company in Westlake, Ohio in
the restaurants management business.  It sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No.
17-16795) on Nov. 17, 2017.  Dennis P. Zarrelli, its
vice-president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$1 million and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Jessica E. Price Smith presides over the case.

CBK Futures is an affiliate of Unique Ventures Group, LLC, which
sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-20526) on
Feb. 13, 2017.

The Debtor tapped Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co. as its
legal counsel.


CGG SA: US Court Recognizes Sanction Order of Safeguard Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Martin Glenn of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York granted the Foreign Representative's motion
for an order recognizing and enforcing the order of the French
Court sanctioning the Safeguard Plan and granting related relief
filed on Dec. 6, 2017. The Motion is supported by the declaration
of Beatrice Place-Faget, appointed foreign representative in this
Chapter 15 case and the declaration of Caroline Texier.

Based on the motion and the attached declarations, the Court finds
that the recognition and enforcement of the Sanctioning Order is
"appropriate relief" under section 1521(a) of the Bankruptcy Code,
and also as "additional assistance" under section 1507. Recognition
and enforcement of the Sanctioning Order is necessary to ensure
that the Financial Restructuring contemplated by the Safeguard Plan
and the confirmed Chapter 11 plan can be implemented to effectuate
the Financial Restructuring of the Group without disruption or
adverse actions being brought against the Foreign Debtor or its
assets in the United States. The Safeguard Plan has received
overwhelming support from the Group's financial creditors and its
shareholders. The effectiveness of the Chapter 11 plan in the
Chapter 11 case is also conditioned upon, among other things,
French Court approval of the Safeguard Plan and this Court’s
recognition and enforcement in this Chapter 15 case of the order of
the Sanctioning Order.

As required by section 1522 of the Bankruptcy Code, the interests
of the Foreign Debtor, its creditors and shareholders are
sufficiently protected under the Safeguard Plan. An order enforcing
the Sanction Order will permit the Foreign Representative to take
the actions necessary to implement the Safeguard Plan in the United
States. Absent recognition and enforcement, the Safeguard Plan may
not be fully implemented as contemplated by, and to the detriment
of, the parties who fully support the Safeguard Plan.

The Court also finds the relief sought by the Foreign
Representative to authorize the Foreign Representative to seek
entry of a final decree to close this Chapter 15 case upon notice
of presentment and deeming this motion to be the final report
required to be filed by the Foreign Representative under Bankruptcy
Rule 5009(c) is warranted. As soon as this Court's order becomes
final and non-appealable and the Effective Date has occurred, the
requirements of section 350(a) of the Bankruptcy Code will be
satisfied.

A full-text copy of Judge Glenn's Memorandum Opinion dated Dec. 21,
2017 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-11636-24.pdf

Attorneys for the Foreign Representative:

     Margot Schonholtz, Esq.
     Robert H. Trust, Esq.
     Christopher J. Hunker, Esq.
     LINKLATTERS LLP
     1345 Avenue of the Americas
     New York, NY 10105
     margot.schonholtz@linklaters.com
     robert.trust@linklaters.com

                      About CGG Holding

Paris, France-based CGG Holding (U.S.) Inc. -- http://www.cgg.com/
-- provides geological, geophysical and reservoir capabilities to
its broad base of customers primarily from the global oil and gas
industry.  Founded in 1931 as "Compagnie Generale de Geophysique",
CGG focuses on seismic surveys and other techniques to help energy
companies locate oil and natural-gas reserves.  The company also
makes geophysical equipment under the Sercel brand name.

The Group has more than 50 locations worldwide, more than 30
separate data processing centers, and a workforce of more than
5,700, of whom more than 600 are solely devoted to research and
development.  CGG is listed on the Euronext Paris SA (ISIN:
0013181864) and the New York Stock Exchange (in the form of
American Depositary Shares, NYSE: CGG).

After a deal was reached key constituencies on a restructuring that
will eliminate $1.95 billion in debt, on June 14, 2017 (i) CGG SA,
the group parent company, opened a "sauvegarde" proceeding, the
French equivalent of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, (ii) 14
subsidiaries of CGG S.A. filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No.
17-11637) in New York, and (iii) CGG S.A filed a petition under
Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
Case No. 17-11636) in New York, seeking recognition in the U.S. of
the Sauvegarde as a foreign main proceeding.

Chapter 11 debtors CGG Canada Services Ltd. and Sercel Canada Ltd.
also commenced proceedings under the Companies' Creditors
Arrangement Act in the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Judicial
District of Calgary in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, to seek
recognition of the Chapter 11 cases in Canada.


CHAPELDALE PROPERTIES: Taps David W. Cohen as Legal Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Chapeldale Properties, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Maryland to hire the Law Offices of David
W. Cohen as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; and provide other legal
services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Cohen charges an hourly fee of $275 for its services.  It received
a retainer from the Debtor in the sum of $7,000.

David Cohen, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that he does not
hold any interest adverse to the Debtor, its creditors or equity
holders.

The firm can be reached through:

     David W. Cohen, Esq.
     Law Office of David W. Cohen
     1 N. Charles St., Ste. 350
     Baltimore, MD 21201
     Tel: (410) 837-6340
     Email: dwcohen79@jhu.edu

                 About Chapeldale Properties LLC

Chapeldale Properties LLC was incorporated in Maryland in 1998.
Its principal assets are located in Baltimore County.

Chapeldale Properties sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-26995) on December 21,
2017.  Ronald Talbert, its manager, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $500,000 and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.

Judge David E. Rice presides over the case.

Pending bankruptcy cases filed by affiliates:

    Debtor                           Petition Date      Case No.
    ------                           -------------      --------
    College Park Investments, LLC      9/22/17          17-22678
    Stein Properties, Inc.             9/22/17          17-22680
    TSC/Green Acres Road, LLC         11/28/17          17-25912
    TSC/JMJ Snowden River South, LLC  10/23/17          17-24510
    TSC/Nesters Landing, LLC          11/28/17          17-25913


CHARMING CHARLIE: Unknown Recovery for Unsecureds Under Plan
------------------------------------------------------------
Charming Charlie Holdings Inc. and its debtor affiliates filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a disclosure
statement for its joint chapter 11 plan of reorganization dated
Dec. 22, 2017.

On December 11, 2017 the Consenting Parties executed the Plan
Support Agreement, together with a Term Sheet, reflecting the
material terms of the restructuring. The Plan Support Agreement
contemplates that the Debtors will emerge from chapter 11 in
approximately 90 business days, and establishes the commitments of
each of the Consenting Lenders, the Owners, and the Debtors to
support the restructuring and, ultimately, the Plan.

The Plan provides for the reorganization of the Debtors as a going
concern. Significantly, the Plan contemplates a significant
reduction in long-term debt and annual cash interest payment
obligations, and infuses new capital in the form of (a) $20 million
new-money, DIP financing; (b) approximately $50 million in exit
term loan debt, across two tranches (collectively defined in the
Plan as the Exit Term Loan Facility; and (c) exit financing, which
shall take the form of either a new revolving credit facility in
the aggregate commitment amount of $35 million or, with the consent
of the Holders of DIP ABL Claims, a conversion of the DIP ABL
Facility (collectively defined in the Plan as the Exit ABL
Facility). Ultimately, the Debtors believe consummation of the Plan
will result in a stronger, de-levered balance sheet for the
Debtors.

On the Effective Date, each Holder of an Allowed Prepetition Term
Loan Claim will receive, in full and final satisfaction of such
claim, and consistent with the terms set forth in the Plan Support
Agreement, its Pro Rata share of 25% of New Equity (subject to
dilution only on account of New Equity issued in connection with
the Management Incentive Plan).

The treatment and recovery of Allowed General Unsecured Claims is
to be determined. In advance of the hearing to consider approval of
the Disclosure Statement, the Debtors will update the Disclosure
Statement to provide additional detail regarding the proposed
recovery, if any, for Holders of Allowed General Unsecured Claims
(such recovery defined herein and in the Plan as the GUC
Distribution). Pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, the recovery
for such Holders shall be determined as agreed upon by the Debtors
and the Requisite First Lien Lenders. It is possible that Holders
of Allowed General Unsecured Claims will not receive any recovery,
in which case such Holders shall be deemed to reject the Plan.

The Plan contemplates the implementation of the Management
Incentive Plan, which will be included with the Plan Supplement and
will reserve up to 10% of the New Equity for issuance. The
Management Incentive Plan will be established and implemented by
the New Board as soon as reasonably practicable following the
Effective Date.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12906-184.pdf

             About Charming Charlie Holdings

Charming Charlie -- http://www.CharmingCharlie.com/-- is a
Houston-based specialty retailer focused on fashion jewelry,
handbags, apparel, gifts and beauty products.  The Company
currently operates more than 375 stores in the United States and
Canada.

Charming Charlie Holdings Inc. and its affiliates sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12906) on Dec. 11,
2017.

Charming Charlie estimated assets of $50 million to $100 million
and debt of $100 million to $500 million.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is serving as the Company's legal counsel,
AlixPartners LLP is serving as its restructuring advisor, and
Guggenheim Securities, LLC is serving as its investment banker.
Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP is the Company's local
counsel.

Rust Consulting/OMNI Bankruptcy is the claims and noticing agent.

Joele Frank, Wilkinson Brimmer Katcher is the Company's
communications consultant.  A&G Realty Partners, LLC's the
Company's real estate advisors.

Hilco Merchant Resources LLC is the Company's exclusive agent.


CLUB VILLAGE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 9
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida is
set to hold a hearing on Jan. 9, 2018, to consider approval of the
disclosure statement, which explains the Chapter 11 plan for Club
Village, LLC.

The hearing will take place at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Flagler
Waterview Building, Room 801, Courtroom A.  Objections are due by
Jan. 2, 2018.

                          About Club Village

Club Village, LLC, a single asset real estate business based in
1601 NW 13 St., Boca Raton, Florida, filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 16-21497) on Aug. 22, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Fred DeFalco, managing member.  The case is
assigned to Judge Erik P. Kimball.  The Debtor disclosed total
assets at $11.5 million and total debts at $11.2 million.

The Debtor is represented by Aaron A. Wernick, Esq., at Furr &
Cohen.  The Debtor engaged Andrew Sodl, Esq., at Akerman LLP as
special counsel; and Paul Rubin, EA, Mtax and Rubin & Associates,
CPA Firm, PA, as accountants.

No trustee, examiner or statutory committee has been appointed in
the Debtor's case.

On December 4, 2017, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of liquidation.


CONDO 64: Can Continue Using Cash Collateral Through Jan. 22
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. James J. Tancredi of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Connecticut has entered a Seventeenth Order authorizing
Condo 64, LLC, to use cash collateral in the ordinary course of its
business up to the maximum amount of $51,508 to be disbursed for
payment of the expenses set forth on the 30 day budget through Jan.
22, 2018.

A final hearing on the Debtor's use of cash collateral will be held
on Jan. 16, 2018, at 2:30 p.m.

As adequate protection to American Eagle Financial Credit Union for
the Debtor's use of cash collateral and for any diminution in the
collateral, American Eagle is granted, nunc pro tunc to the
Petition Date, the following:

     (a) A continuing postpetition lien and security interest in
all prepetition property of the Debtor as it existed on the
Petition Date, of the same type against which American Eagle held
validly protected liens and security interests as of the Petition
Date; and

     (b) A continuing postpetition lien in all property acquired by
the Debtor after the Petition Date.  The Replacement Liens will
maintain the same priority, validity and enforceability as American
Eagle's liens on the initial collateral and will be recognized only
to the extent of any diminution in the value of the collateral
resulting from the use of cash collateral pursuant to the
Seventeenth Order.

     (c) The Debtor is authorized to pay to American Eagle the sum
of $7,500 for the month of December, which payment will satisfy the
Debtor's obligation under Section 362(d)(3)(B) of the Bankruptcy
Code during the Cash Collateral Usage Period.

     (d) The Debtor agrees to use best efforts to produce a
commitment letter on or before January 16, 2018 for refinancing a
portion of the secured debt of American Eagle.

The liens of American Eagle and any replacement thereof pursuant to
the Seventeenth Order, and any priority to which American Eagle may
be entitled or becomes entitled under Section 507(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code, will be subject to and subordinate to:

     (i) amounts payable by the Debtor under Section 1930(a)(6) of
Title 28 of the United States Code;

    (ii) amounts due and owing to the Debtor's employees or
contract labor for post-petition wages or services which accrue
during the term of this Order, and

   (iii) for the allowed fees and expenses of Debtor's retained
counsel, Halloran & Sage, LLP, Kevin Mason, Esq., and accountants,
in an amount not to exceed $75,000, to be paid from proceeds of
American Eagle's collateral in the event allowed administrative
fees of Debtor's Professionals are not paid or available from cash
on hand from the Debtor's operations, or from the sale or refinance
of the Debtor's property.

A full-text copy of the Seventeenth Order is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/ctb15-21797-285.pdf

                      About Condo 64 LLC

Condo 64, LLC, a single asset real estate under 11 U.S.C. Sec.
101(51B), is the owner of 67 of the 112 condominium units and the
leases and rents in connection therewith at the location known as
505-509 Burnside Avenue, East Hartford, Connecticut.

Condo 64 filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Conn. Case No.
15-21797) on Oct. 16, 2015.  The petition was signed by Oliver C.
Pinkard, managing member.  The Debtor disclosed total assets at
$4.6 million and total liabilities at $3.1 million at the time of
the filing.

The case is assigned to Judge Ann M. Nevins.

The Debtor hired Kaitlin M. Humble, Esq., and Craig I. Lifland,
Esq., at Halloran & Sage LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; and MAC
Commercial Financing Inc. as mortgage broker.
No trustee, examiner or creditors' committee has been appointed in
the case.


COOLWATER ESTATES: Taps Re/Max Platinum as Broker
-------------------------------------------------
Coolwater Estates, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Texas to hire a real estate
broker.

The Debtor proposes to employ Re/Max Platinum in connection with
the sale of its real property located at 12085 Coolwater Circle,
Forney, Texas.

The agreed upon commission is 6% of the sales price.  The approved
real estate listing sale price is $135,000.

Vicki Cook, the Re/Max agent handling the listing, disclosed in a
court filing that she holds a 25% membership interest in the Debtor
but other than this, she has no connections with the Debtor or any
of its creditors.

The firm can be reached through:

     Vicki Cook
     Re/Max Platinum
     205 E. Highway 80, Suite 175
     Forney, TX 75126
     Tel: 972-679-5118 / 972-564-4400

                     About Coolwater Estates

Coolwater Estates, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34460) on Dec. 1,
2017.  Judge Stacey G. Jernigan presides over the case.   At the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $1
million and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The Debtor tapped
Christopher J. Moser, Esq., at Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett
& Moser, P.C., as legal counsel.


CSA HOLDINGS: Thayer O'Neal Raises Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------
CSA Holdings, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net loss of
$893,096 on $2,335,323 of revenue for the year ended December 31,
2016, compared to a net loss of $1,921,280 on $796,677 of revenue
for the year ended in 2015.

Thayer O'Neal Company, LLC, in Houston, Texas, expressed
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations and negative cash flows from operating
activities.

The Company's balance sheet at December 31, 2016, showed total
assets of $1,556,142, total  liabilities of $1,315,619, and a total
stockholders' equity of $240,523.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:
                              
                       https://is.gd/3bsZYc

                     About CSA Holdings, Inc.

Based in Denver, Colo., CSA Holdings, Inc., is a security solutions
provider catering to businesses in the cannabis industry.  The
Company provides its customers security system design services,
installation, consulting services in physical security solutions
and security systems as part of the state licensing process in the
cannabis business.  The Company's operations include the
installations of alarms, door access systems, video cameras,
security system design, monitoring and consulting.



CUSTOM STONE: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 18
----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia is
set to hold a hearing on Jan. 18 to consider approval of the
disclosure statement, which explains the Chapter 11 plan for Custom
Stone Company, Inc.

The hearing will be held at 11:00 a.m., at Chief Judge St. John's
Courtroom.  Objections must be filed on or before seven days prior
to the hearing.

Under the proposed plan, general unsecured claims are classified in
Class 5.  As of the petition date, the total balance owed to
unsecured creditors was $294,501.67.  These claims are not entitled
to any interest.  

All payments will be made on a pro-rata basis and payments will be
remitted on an annual basis, beginning at the end of year 3 and
going through the end of the plan term.  The payments will be sent
month 37 (totaling $18,000); month 49 (totaling $39,000) and month
60 (totaling $40,450).  These payments include new value being paid
by owners of the company.

Payments and distributions under the plan will be funded from
future income received by the company and funds on hand as well as
new value paid by the owners, both as payments made on a monthly
basis as well as the sale of certain of their assets, according to
the company's disclosure statement.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/vaeb16-72508-55.pdf

                  About Custom Stone Company Inc.

Custom Stone Company, Inc. is a Virginia corporation, which
fabricates, designs and sells custom stone product.  It has been
operating since November 1995 and employs 35 people, some of whom
are part-time and some are full-time.

Custom Stone Company sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 16-72508) on July 18,
2016.  The petition was signed by Kenneth R. Sims, president.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and
debts at $1 million to $10 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Stephen C. St. John.  Roussos,
Glanzer & Barnhart, PLC is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


DOCASA INC: Green & Company CPAs Casts Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------
DOCASA, Inc., filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K, disclosing a net loss of
$1,425,846 on $4,180,483 of revenue for the year ended August 31,
2017, compared to a net income of $27,325 on $3,869,517 of revenue
for the year ended in 2016.

Green & Company CPAs, Inc., in Temple Terrace, Fla., states that
the Company had a working capital deficit, shareholders' equity and
accumulated deficit of $770,349, $461,970 and $2,766,367,
respectively.  These matters raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company's balance sheet at August 31, 2017, showed total assets
of $2,486,217, total liabilities of $2,024,247, and a total
stockholders' equity of $461,970.

A copy of the Form 10-K is available at:
                              
                       https://is.gd/FcTdza

                        About DOCASA, Inc.

DOCASA, Inc., formerly FWF Holdings, Inc., is engaged in the
business of coffee and related products.  The Company is focused on
investment in coffee market principally in the United Kingdom.
Through its subsidiary, Department of Coffee and Social Affairs
Limited the Company is engaged in selling coffee and related
products, and complementary food and snacks.  The Company owns and
operates 14 coffee shop locations across the United Kingdom.


EDWARD GREENE: Court OKs Bid to Waive Ombudsman Requirement
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Terry L. Myers of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Idaho has entered an Order granting the Edward James
Greene and Tera N Greene's Motion to Waive Requirement of
Ombudsman.

The Court finds that the Debtors operate a dental office, which
treats patients for dentistry, dentures and oral surgery, but Dr.
Greene's patients do not reside at the facility nor remain there
after treatment that occurs during daytime business hours.

Further, the Court notes that that the companion case of Accure
Dental PC, Case No. 17-00837-JDP (since dismissed) filed a similar
motion which was granted for following factors:

     (1) The Debtor does not operate a long-term care facility; a
skilled nursing facility; an intermediate care facility; an
assisted living facility; a home for the aged; a domiciliary care
facility; or a facility that offers assistance with activities of
daily living.

     (2) The patients of the Debtor are dental patients not
residing at Debtor's offices.

     (3) Neither of these Debtors is subject to any disciplinary
actions by any agency that regulates their practice.

Edward James Greene and Tera N. Greene filed Chapter 11 Petition
(Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 17-01292) on September 28, 2017. The
Debtors are represented by D Blair Clark, Esq.


EMPIRE DIE: LM Insurance Not Obliged to Satisfy Judgment
--------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned LM INSURANCE CORPORATION., et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AMANDA CRISS, Administratrix for the
estate of George Szuhay, Defendant-Appellant, No. 16-4761 (6th
Cir.), Amanda Criss, serving as Adminstratrix for the estate of
George Szuhay, appeals the district court's declaratory judgment
holding that Appellee LM Insurance, which underwrote a commercial
general-liability insurance policy for non-party Empire Die Casting
Co., Inc., has no obligation to satisfy a default judgment that
Szuhay obtained against Empire. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth
Circuit affirms the decision of the district court.

Non-party Barnett & Brown Personnel Services, Inc., d/b/a Integrity
Staffing Services, is a staffing service that "leases" employees to
companies. Integrity Staffing and Empire entered into an agreement
that allowed Empire to "lease" employees from Integrity Staffing
when Empire needed to fill a position in its company. The Leasing
Agreement provided that when Empire wanted to lease an Integrity
Staffing employee, it would provide Integrity Staffing a
description of the position it sought to fill, the experience
required for the position, and any other relevant job
specifications. Integrity Staffing would then identify candidates
in its employ and send materials for those candidates to Empire.
Empire had the option to accept or reject any candidates Integrity
Staffing sent, and the Leasing Agreement did not require Empire to
fill a position with an Integrity Staffing employee.

The Leasing Agreement governed the companies' respective
responsibilities to each other and to leased employees should
Empire elect to fill an open position with a leased employee from
Integrity Staffing. Relevant to Szuhay's arguments, the Leasing
Agreement required Empire to "maintain liability insurance coverage
covering the acts of [l]eased [e]mployees to the same extent as it
maintain[ed] [liability insurance] coverage with respect to the
acts of [its] direct employees," and included a reciprocal
indemnification clause instructing that Integrity Staffing and
Empire would indemnify and hold harmless one another for any
damages arising from their own respective conduct.

Here, Szuhay seeks payment under the Insurance Policy of a judgment
against Empire for an injury that "ar[ose] out of and in the course
of" his employment as a "leased employee/leased worker" with
Empire. That kind of injury is specifically excluded from coverage
under the Insurance Policy. This Insurance Policy is not an
employers' liability policy or a worker's compensation policy;
rather, it is a commercial general-liability policy, and "[u]nlike
worker's compensation insurance or employers' liability insurance,
which exist to provide employers with coverage for injuries that
occur to employees during the scope of employment, the sole purpose
of commercial general liability insurance is to provide coverage
for injuries that occur to the public-at-large." The judgment,
therefore, is not for a "sum[] that [Empire is] legally obligated
to pay as damages because of 'bodily injury' . . . to which this
insurance applies." The Lease Agreement obligated Empire to
maintain liability-insurance coverage for the acts of leased
employees to the same extent as it maintained liability-insurance
coverage for the acts of its direct employees. Empire did just
that. The Insurance Policy is a commercial general-liability policy
that covers the acts of employees causing injury to the public, and
specifically excludes the kind of bodily injury at issue here if
suffered by a direct employee of Empire.

Szuhay's argument that Integrity Staffing is an "additional
insured" under the Insurance Policy makes no difference to the
resolution of this case. Szuhay has at no point asserted any claims
against Integrity Staffing or obtained a judgment of liability
against it. The only justiciable controversy before this panel is
whether the Insurance Policy covers the judgment against Empire. It
plainly does not.

The district court did not err by granting declaratory judgment for
LM Insurance that it has no obligation under the Insurance Policy
to satisfy a default judgment secured against insured non-party
Empire.

A full-text copy of the 6th Circuit's Decision dated Dec. 19, 2017
is available at https://is.gd/1R57nE from Leagle.com.

                       About Empire Die

Macedonia, Ohio-based Empire Die Casting Co., Inc., sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Ohio Case No. 13-52996) on Oct. 16, 2013.  The Debtor estimated
assets of $10 million to $50 million and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million.  The petition was signed by Robert Hopkins,
president.  The case is before Judge Marilyn Shea-Stonum.

The Debtor tapped Brouse McDowell, LPA, in Akron, Ohio, as
bankruptcy counsel, Amherst Consulting, LLC, as restructuring
consultant and Amherst Partners as investment banker.  The Debtor
also tapped the law firms of Roetzel & Andress, LP and Stites &
Harbison, PLLLC as special counsel in connection with a claim in
the Chapter 11 case of Oreck Manufacturing Corp.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors is represented by
Freeborn & Peters LLP.

FirstMerit Bank, N.A. is represented by Scott N. Opincar, Esq., at
McDonald Hopkins LLC, in Cleveland, Ohio.

On Dec. 19, 2013, the Court approved the sale of substantially all
of the Debtor's assets to American Light Metals, LLC, the designee
of SRS International Holdings Inc., the successful bidder at the
Dec. 18 auction.  In connection with the sale, the Debtor sold its
name, Empire Die Casting Co, Inc., to ALM.  The sale closed on Dec.
31, 2013.


EZRA HOLDINGS: Wants to Vote Its Interest in Eminent Offshore
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ezra Holdings Ltd. and its affiliated debtors ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to authorize
Ezra to vote its interest in Eminent Offshore Logistics Pte. Ltd.
to approve the board of directors' recommendation to sell vessels
for purposes of scrap at fair market value.

One of the companies in which Ezra holds an ownership interest is
Eminent Offshore.  Eminent Offshore is a joint venture between Ezra
and Ezion Holdings Ltd.  Eminent Offshore owns six vessels,
currently located either in Indonesia or the UAE, none of which are
currently in service and which have been kept out of service in
order to minimize operating expenses.

On Nov. 28, 2017, Eminent Offshore's board of directors issued a
Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting ("EGM Notice") to Ezra and
Ezion, detailing Eminent Offshore's precarious financial position
and recommended course of action.  The proposed EGM described
therein has not yet taken place, and has been adjourned pending
Ezra's obtaining bankruptcy court approval to vote its interest
therein.  

The EGM Notice sets forth the following general background with
regard to Eminent Offshore's current status:

     a. Eminent Offshore has been unable to secure work for its
vessels for a number of reasons, including, that the vessels'
conditions are unfit for work.  Moreover, Eminent Offshore faces
significant costs to render the vessels suitable for work,
including costs of repair, engaging shallow draft/assist tugs to
shift the vessels from their current yard, and port due during such
repairs.

     b. In addition to the general status of the vessels, Eminent
Offshore has experienced difficulty securing work for these vessels
due to poor market conditions.  Even when potential charterers
inquired, the vessels did not meet most charterers' requirements
because they are not ballastable.

     c. Further, with respect to the vessels located in the UAE,
such vessels now must clear UAE waters before entering to comply
with UAE regulations.  Such compliance would result in substantial
additional cost.

     d. Eminent Offshore is currently insolvent, holding cash of
approximately $33,000 and facing liabilities in excess of $2.3
million (excluding shareholder loans).  The company incurs at least
$2,000 per day related to berthing and port dues in connection with
the vessels.

     e. Under the circumstances, Eminent Offshore's board of
directors recommends selling the vessels for purposes of scrap at
fair market value.

A copy of the EGM Notice attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Ezra_Holdings_280_Sales.pdf

Eminent Offshore's board of directors has also advised that, if
they cannot obtain the requisite approval to sell their vessels,
they intend to file an application with the Singapore High Court to
wind-up Eminent Offshore.  Ezra, as a 50% joint venture owner of
Eminent Offshore, agrees with the board of directors'
recommendation and believes a sale of the vessels is in the best
interest of Eminent Offshore.

Because its ownership interest in Eminent Offshore constitutes
property of its bankruptcy estate, and because it is asked to vote
its ownership interest at an extraordinary general meeting, Ezra's
decision to vote its shares in favor of the transaction may
constitute a use of property outside the ordinary course of
business as contemplated by section 363(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Accordingly, the Debtors respectfully ask entry of an order
authorizing Ezra to vote its interest in Eminent Offshore to
approve the board of directors' recommendation, and for such other
authority as may reasonably relate thereto.

Due to the limited nature of the "use" of property sought, the
voting of shares to approve a non-debtor entity's business
dealings, the Debtors respectfully suggest no purpose is served by
a 14-day stay of the order approving the Motion, and respectfully
ask relief from the stay provided in Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h).

                       About Ezra Holdings

Founded in 1992, Ezra Holdings Limited --
http://www.ezraholdings.com/-- is an offshore contractor and
provider of integrated offshore solutions to the global oil and gas
industry.  Ezra is incorporated in Singapore with its registered
office at 15 Hoe Chiang Road #28-01 Tower Fifteen Singapore 089316.
Its shares were listed on the SGX Sesdaq on Aug. 8, 2003, and
moved to the Mainboard of the Singapore Exchange since Dec. 8,
2005.  It also issued certain notes (S$150,000,000 4.875% Notes due
2018 comprised in Series 003) which have been listed on the
Singapore Exchange since 2013.

Ezra established and maintains an office in the United States
located at 75 South Broadway, Fourth Floor, Office Number 489,
White Plains, New York 10601.  Ezra also has a wholly owned New
York subsidiary, Ezra Holdings (NY) Inc., which was incorporated in
the United States of America with 200 shares at a nominal issue
price per share.

EMITS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Ezra, provides supporting
information technology services to each of the Ezra Group's
business divisions.  Ezra Marine, another wholly owned subsidiary
of Ezra, has a leasehold interest in the marine base in Singapore
located at 51 Shipyard Road, Singapore 628139 and leases out the
base's facilities and provides various support services in
connection with the marine base to the Ezra Group's operating
entities.

Ezra Holdings and two affiliates -- Ezra Marine Services Pte. Ltd.
and EMAS IT Solutions Pte Ltd -- filed voluntary Chapter 11
bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-22405) on
March 18, 2017, before the Honorable Robert D. Drain.  The
petitions were signed by Tan Cher Liang, director.  Ezra Holdings
estimated $500 million to $1 billion in assets and $100 million to
$500 million in liabilities.  The Debtors' Chapter 11 Cases are
being jointly administered for procedural purposes only.

Lawyers at Saul Ewing, led by Sharon L. Levine, Esq., serve as the
Debtors' Chapter 11 counsel.  The Debtors tapped as general
Singapore counsel Drew & Napier LLC; and claims and noticing agent,
Prime Clerk LLC.  Foxwood LLC also serves as special counsel.

The Ezra Group's joint venture, EMAS CHIYODA Subsea Limited, and
certain of its affiliate companies filed voluntary Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-31146) on Feb. 27,
2017.  ECS' wholly-owned subsidiary, EMAS-AMC AS, has also been
placed under members' voluntary liquidation in Norway.

Ezra guaranteed substantial charter hire liabilities of the ECS
Group, as well as certain loans owed by the ECS Group to financial
institutions, Ezra faces potentially significant contingent
liability if the creditors call on the guarantees.

Ezra received statutory demands from Svenska Handelsbanken AB
(Publ), Singapore Branch and Forland Subsea AS on Jan. 24, 2017,
and Feb. 6, 2017, respectively. These statutory demands have since
expired under Singapore law and these two creditors may commence
winding up applications against Ezra.  Ezra also received a
statutory demand from VT Halter Marine, Inc. on March 9, 2017.


FLO'S LLC: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Feb. 7
------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona will hold an
initial hearing on Feb. 7, 2018, to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Flo's LLC and its
affiliates.

The hearing will be held at Courtroom 702, at 10:00 a.m.

The court will also consider at the hearing final approval of the
companies' disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
Dec. 7.

Creditors have until January 31, 2018, to file their objections to
the plan and cast their votes accepting or rejecting the plan.

                      About Flo's LLC

Flo's LLC, Flo's Second LLC and Flo's Restaurants Inc. sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Ariz.
Lead Case No. 17-09181) on Aug. 8, 2017.  Dustin W. Wallace,
manager, signed the petitions.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtors disclosed that they had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of $1 million
to $10 million.

Allen Barnes & Jones, PLC, represents the Debtor as bankruptcy
counsel.

On December 1, 2017, the Debtors filed a disclosure statement,
which explains their proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.


FREEDOM LEAF: Accumulated Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom Leaf, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $707,584 on $1,327 of revenue for the
three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with a net loss of
$401,892 on $120,554 of revenue for the same period in 2016.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $1,020,906,
total liabilities of $905,345, and a $58,439 in total stockholders'
deficit.

The Company has a net loss for the three months ended September 30,
2017 of $707,584 and working capital deficit as of September 30,
2017 of $87,018, and has used cash in operations of $101,805 for
the three months ended September 30, 2017.  In addition, as of
September 30, 2017, the Company had a stockholders' deficit and
accumulated deficit of $58,439 and $5,628,572, respectively.  These
conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/6NGnnd

                       About Freedom Leaf

Freedom Leaf, Inc., is focused on being the national and
international news source for the Cannabis/Industrial Hemp
industry.  The Company, through its online and print media
channels, is engaged in dissemination of current legislation and
legal news, arts and entertainment.  The Company provides
advertisements in publications, both print and online, in the
cannabis/hemp marketplace.


FREEMAN GRADING: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Freeman Grading & Excavating, LLC
        3025 S. 475 W
        Trafalgar, IN 46181

Type of Business: Freeman Grading & Excavating, LLC, is an
                  excavating contractor based in Trafalgar,
                  Indiana.  The company is a small business
                  debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
                  101(51D).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 3, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court  
       Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis)

Case No.: 18-00037

Judge: Hon. Jeffrey J. Graham

Debtor's Counsel: John Joseph Allman, Esq.
                  HESTER BAKER KREBS LLC
                  One Indiana Square, Suite 1600
                  211 N. Pennsylvania Street
                  Indianapolis, IN 46204
                  Tel: 317-833-3030
                  Fax: 317-833-3031
                  E-mail: jallman@hbkfirm.com

                    - and -

                  David R. Krebs, Esq.
                  HESTER BAKER KREBS LLC
                  One Indiana Square, Suite 1600
                  211 N. Pennsylvania Street
                  Indianapolis, IN 46204
                  Tel: 317-833-3030
                  Fax: 317-833-3031
                  E-mail: dkrebs@hbkfirm.com

Estimated Assets: $500,000 to $1 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Michael D. Freeman, member and 100%
owner.

A full-text copy of the petition, along with a list of 20 largest
unsecured creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/insb18-00037.pdf


FYNDERS INC: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 18
---------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts is set
to hold a hearing on Jan. 18, 2018, to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Fynders, Inc. and Keepers,
Inc.

The hearing will be held at 11:00 a.m., at the Donohue Federal
Building, Courtroom 3.

The court had earlier approved the company's disclosure statement,
allowing it to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Christopher Panos on Dec. 7, set a Jan.
11, 2018 deadline for creditors to file their objections and cast
their votes accepting or rejecting the plan.

Under the plan, the companies' general unsecured creditors will
receive deferred cash payments equal to 10% of their allowed claims
over 48 months from the effective date of the plan.  These
creditors will be paid in equal quarterly installments without
interest.

A copy of the second amended disclosure statement is available for
free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-40400-138.pdf

                        About Fynders Inc.

Fynders, Inc., runs restaurant located in West Boylston,
Massachusetts operating under the name Finders Pub.  Finders is
located next door to its affiliated restaurant, Keepers, Inc.,
which does business as Keepers Pub.

On June 23, 2010, Fynders and Keepers filed jointly administered
petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, In re Fynders,
Inc., 10-43170 and In re Keepers, Inc., 10-43171.  The Court
confirmed the Debtors' Combined Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement on Dec. 21, 2010.  

Due to additional financial difficulties, Fynders, Inc., and
Keepers again sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Mass. Case
No. 17-40400) on March 7, 2017.  The petitions were signed by
Kathleen McCormick, president.

At the time of filing, Fynders disclosed $139,750 in total assets
and $2.21 million in total liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Christopher J. Panos.

David B. Madoff, Esq., at Madoff & Khoury LLP, is serving as
counsel to the Debtors.  Patrick J. Crowley of Hershman Fallatrom &
Crowley, Inc., is the Debtors' accountant.

An official creditors' committee has not been appointed in the
cases.


GALVESTON BAY: Oil & Gas Vendor Claim to be Paid in 12 Months
-------------------------------------------------------------
Galveston Bay Properties LLC (GBP) has filed a disclosure statement
dated December 4, 2017 with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Texas.

The following are the classes and proposed treatment of claims and
interests under the plan:

Class 1 – Allowed Priority Claims of Governmental Entities

Each holder of an Allowed Priority Claim of a Governmental Entity,
if any, shall be paid its Priority Claim in such amount as is
Allowed, in full, in Cash, through equal Monthly Plan Payments, or
as otherwise agreed, together with interest at the rate required by
Bankruptcy Code section 511, or if applicable, the rate authorized
by Texas Tax Code section 33.01, over a period through the fifth
anniversary of the Petition Date. Each Governmental Entity shall
retain its Liens, if any, until paid in full. There are not
anticipated to be any Allowed Class 1 Claims.

Class 2 – Allowed Priority Claims of Non-Governmental Entities

Each holder of an Allowed Priority Claim of a NonGovernmental
Entity, if any, shall be paid its Priority Claim in such amount as
is Allowed, in full, in Cash, on the Effective Date.

Class 3 – Allowed Secured Claims of Governmental Entities

Each holder of an Allowed Secured Claim of a Governmental Entity,
if any, shall be paid its Secured Claim as and when due in the
ordinary course of the Reorganized Debtor's business. Each
Governmental Entity shall retain its Liens until paid in full.

Class 4 – Allowed Secured Claims of Quintium Private
Opportunities Fund, LP, Shadow Tree Funding Vehicle AHydrocarb LLC,
Shadow Tree Capital Management LLC

The holders of the Allowed Secured Claims of Quintium Private
Opportunities Fund, LP, Shadow Tree Funding Vehicle A-Hydrocarb
LLC, Shadow Tree Capital Management LLC, shall receive payment in
full of their Claims, together with interest at the Plan Interest
Rate, through sixty (60) equal monthly payments commencing on the
Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter. The holders of
the Allowed Secured Claims of Quintium Private Opportunities Fund,
LP, Shadow Tree Funding Vehicle A-Hydrocarb LLC, Shadow Tree
Capital Management LLC shall retain their Liens until paid in full.
Each monthly payment under the plan shall be timely made by the
Reorganized Debtor so that it is actually received by Shadow Tree
Capital Management LLC on or before the 5th business day of each
month. The failure to timely make any such payment shall be a Class
4 Event of Default. A Class 4 Event of Default that remains uncured
for 10 days following notice of default to the Reorganized Debtor
shall be a Material Default under the Plan.

Class 5 – Allowed Oil and Gas Vendor Claim

Each holder of an Allowed Oil and Gas Vendor Claim shall be paid
its Claim, in full, in Cash, together with interest at the Plan
Interest Rate, in twelve (12) equal monthly installment payments
commencing on the Effective Date and monthly thereafter, so long as
there has been no Material Default by the Reorganized Debtor in
treatment of Class 4.

Class 6 – Clow Partners PrePetition Equity Interests

On the Effective Date, in order to effectuate the 18.5% Conversion,
the 13.81% Conversation, and the 25.61% Right, Clow Partners shall
return 56.44% of its Pre-Petition Membership Interests to the
Reorganized Debtor. In exchange, Clow Partners shall be due from
the Reorganized Debtor the sum of $2,925,000 (the "Clow Partners
Sum"), which sum shall be paid, in full, in Cash, commencing upon
satisfaction of the Allowed Class 1, 2, 3, and 5 Claims, from 75%
of the production revenues of the Reorganized Debtor, after payment
of royalties and current operating expenses. The Clow Partners Sum
shall accrue interest at the rate of 5.5% per annum, compounded
annually, from the Effective Date, until paid in full (the
foregoing constitutes the "Clow Partners Treatment Package")." The
balance of the Clow Partners remaining 18.56% Pre-Petition
Membership Interest shall be placed into escrow pending payment of
all Class 1, 2, 3, and 5 Claims by the Reorganized Debtor pursuant
to the terms of the Plan. While the Clow Partners 18.56%
Pre-Petition membership Interest is in escrow, it shall have no
voting, management, or distribution rights in the Reorganized
Debtor. Upon completion of the Reorganized Debtor's duties and
obligations to pay Allowed Class 1, 2, 3, and 5 Claims pursuant to
the Plan, the Pre-Petition Membership Interests of Clow Partners
shall revest with all attendant rights. No payment shall be made on
account of the Clow Partners Sum in the event of any Material
Default by the Reorganized Debtor in treatment of Class 4 under the
Plan. No dividend or distributions shall be made to Clow Partners
while there exists a Material Default under the Plan.

Class 7 – All Other Pre-Petition Membership Interests

On the Effective Date, in order to effectuate the 18.5% Conversion,
the 13.81% Conversation, and the 25.61% Right: (1) Polk Petroleum
shall return .9472% of its Pre-Petition Membership Interests to the
Reorganized Debtor; (2) Westwood shall return .1776% of its
Pre-Petition Membership Interests to the Reorganized Debtor; (3)
Rubicon shall return .1776% of its Pre-Petition Membership
Interests to the Reorganized Debtor; and (4) Prospect shall return
.1776% of its Pre-Petition Membership Interests to the Reorganized
Debtor. The remaining Pre-Petition Membership Interests of
Prospect, Westwood, Rubicon, and Polk Petroleum shall be placed in
escrow pending payment of all Allowed Class 1, 2, 3, and 5 Claims
by the Reorganized Debtor pursuant to the terms of the Plan. While
the Pre-Petition Membership Interests of Prospect, Westwood,
Rubicon, and Polk Petroleum remain in escrow, they shall have no
voting, management, or distribution rights in the Reorganized
Debtor. Upon completion of the Reorganized Debtor's duties and
obligations to pay all Allowed Class 1, 2, 3, and 5 Claims pursuant
to the Plan, the Pre-Petition Membership Interests of Prospect,
Westwood, Rubicon, and Polk Petroleum shall revest with all
attendant rights. For avoidance of doubt, the revesting of the
Pre-Petition Membership Interests of Prospect, Westwood, Rubicon,
and Polk Petroleum, is not conditioned upon performance by the
Reorganized Debtor of the Clow Partners Treatment Package. No
dividend or distributions shall be made to Prospect, Westwood,
Rubicon, and Polk Petroleum while there exists a Material Default
under the Plan.

A full-text copy of GBP's disclosure statement is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb17-51905-cag-106.pdf

Galveston Bay is represented by:

          KELL C. MERCER, P.C.
          1602 E. Cesar Chavez Street
          Austin, TX 78702
          Tel: (512) 627-3512
          Fax: (512) 597-0767
          Email: kell.mercer@mercer-law-pc.com

                    About Galveston Bay

Headquartered in New Braunfels, Texas, Galveston Bay Properties LLC
is an oil and gas extraction business.  Galveston Bay Properties
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case
No. 17-51905) on Aug. 9, 2017, estimating its assets at between $10
million and $50 million and debt at between $1 million and $10
million. The petition was signed by Dan Polk, manager.

Judge Craig A. Gargotta presides over the case.

Kell C. Mercer, Esq., at Kell C. Mercer, PC, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


GANDER MOUNTAIN: Court Approves Outline of Liquidating Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota approved
the outline of the joint Chapter 11 plan of liquidation for Gander
Mountain Company and Overton's Inc.

The court gave the thumbs-up to the disclosure statement after
finding that it contains "adequate information."

The liquidating plan was jointly filed by the companies and the
official committee of unsecured creditors on October 31, 2017.

                       About Gander Mountain

Gander Mountain Company operates outdoor specialty stores dedicated
for shooting sports, hunting, fishing, camping, marine, apparel,
footwear, and outdoor lifestyle products.  Its subsidiary
Overton's, Inc., is a catalog and internet retailer of products for
the recreational boater and other water sports enthusiasts at
http://www.Overtons.com/           

Gander Mountain and Overton's Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Minn. Case Nos. 17-30673 and
17-30675) on March 10, 2017.  The cases are jointly administered
under Case No. 17-30673.  The petitions were signed by Timothy
Becker, Executive VP of Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., as CRO.

The cases are assigned to Judge Michael E. Ridgway.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and debt
at $500 million to $1 billion.

The Debtors' advisors in the restructuring are Fredrikson & Byron,
PA, which serves as legal counsel; Lighthouse Management Group,
chief restructuring officer; Hilco Real Estate LLC, real estate
advisor; and Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, special corporate counsel.
Donlin, Recano & Company Inc. is the Debtors' claims, noticing and
balloting agent.  Houlihan Lokey Capital Inc. serves as the
Debtors' investment banker.

On March 13, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Jeffrey Cohen, Esq., at Lowenstein Sandler LLP, as its counsel and
Connie Lahn, Esq., Christopher Knapp, Esq., and Roger Maldonado,
Esq., at Barnes & Thornburg LLP as co-counsel.


GB SCIENCES: Recurring Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------
GB Sciences, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $3,178,575 on $136,646 of net revenue for
the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with a net loss
of $2,505,965 on $nil of revenue for the same period in 2016.

For the six months ended September 30, 2017, the Company listed a
net loss of $6,301,270 on $190,745 of net revenue, compared to a
net loss of $3,884,873 on $nil of net revenue for the same period
in the prior year.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $15.16
million, total liabilities of $7.49 million, and a $7.66 million in
total stockholders' equity.

The Company has sustained net losses since inception, which have
caused an accumulated deficit of approximately $41.5 million at
September 30, 2017.  In addition, the Company has consumed cash in
its operating activities of approximately $5.2 million for the six
months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $1.7 million for the
same period last year.  These factors, among others, raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

Management has been able, thus far, to finance the losses through a
public offering, private placements and obtaining operating funds
from stockholders.  The Company is continuing to seek sources of
financing.  There are no assurances that the Company will be
successful in securing capital necessary to achieve its goals.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/1qWjiv

                     About GB Sciences, Inc.

GB Sciences, Inc., formerly Growblox Sciences, Inc., is engaged in
developing and utilizing technologies in plant biology, cultivation
and extraction techniques combined with biotechnology, and plans to
produce medical-grade cannabis, cannabis concentrates and
cannabinoid therapies.  It seeks to be a technology and solution
company that converts the cannabis plant into medicines, therapies
and treatments for a range of ailments.


GENON ENERGY: Court Confirms 3rd Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. David R. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas confirmed the third amended joint
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization of GenOn Energy Inc. and its
debtor-affiliates.

The effective date of the Debtors' plan will occur after all the
conditions precedent set for in Article X.B of the plan either
occur of are waived.  Under the Debtors' restructuring support
agreement, the outside date for the occurrence of the effective
date is currently set for June 30, 2018, or Sept. 30, 2018, if the
regulatory approvals are still pending.

Additionally, holders of timely-filed claims may assert a right to
payment of post-petition interest in connection therewith by filing
a document with the Court by Feb. 2, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing
Central Time).

Under the Third Amended Plan, the Debtors disclosed settlement with
GenOn Mid-Atlantic, LLC ("GenMa").

A full-text copy of the Third Amended Plan is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-33695-1214.pdf

A redlined version of the Third Amended Plan is available at:

        http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-33695-1249.pdf

                       About GenOn Energy

GenOn Energy, Inc., is a wholesale power generation corporation
with 15,394 megawatts in generating capacity, operating operate 32
power plants in eight states. GenOn is subsidiary of NRG Energy
Inc., which is a competitive power company that produces, sells and
delivers energy and energy services, primarily in major competitive
power markets in the U.S.

GenOn is the product of two mergers since 2010.  First, on Dec. 3,
2010, two wholesale power generation companies -- RRI Energy, a
company formerly known as Reliant Energy, and Mirant Corporation --
completed an all-stock, tax-free merger with Mirant becoming RRI's
wholly-owned subsidiary.  Following the merger, RRI took its
current name: GenOn.

NRG, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, and GenOn completed a
stock-for-stock merger in a $6 billion deal, with GenOn continuing
as the surviving company on December 14, 2012.  NRG, as
consideration for acquiring GenOn's entire equity, issued 0.1216
shares of NRG common stock for each outstanding share of GenOn.  In
structuring the merger, NRG "ring-fenced" GenOn's debt, leaving
GenOn's creditors without recourse against NRG's assets in the
event of GenOn's default.

As of March 31, 2017, GenOn Energy had $4.81 billion in total
assets, $4.51 billion in total liabilities and $304 million in
total stockholders' equity.

GenOn Energy, Inc. ("GenOn"), GenOn Americas Generation, LLC
("GAG") and 60 of their directly and indirectly-owned subsidiaries
commenced the Chapter 11 cases in Houston, Texas (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Lead Case No. 17-33695) on June 14, 2017, to implement a
restructuring plan negotiated with stakeholders prepetition.  The
Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge David R. Jones.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Zack A.
Clement, PLLC, is the local counsel.  Rothschild Inc. is the
financial advisor and investment banker.  McKinsey Recovery &
Transformation Services U.S. is the restructuring advisor.  Epiq
Systems, Inc., is the claims and noticing agent.

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC serves as GenOn Energy's
financial advisor and investment banker.

Special Counsel to the GAG Steering Committee is Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.  The Steering Committee of GAG
Noteholders is comprised of Benefit Street Partners LLC, Brigade
Capital Management, LP, Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, and Solus
Alternative Asset Management LP, each on behalf of itself or
certain affiliates, and/or accounts managed and/or advised by it or
its affiliates.

Counsel to the GenOn Steering Committee and the GAG Steering
Committee are Keith H. Wofford, Esq., Stephen Moeller-Sally, Esq.,
and Marc B. Roitman, Esq., at Ropes & Gray LLP.

Counsel for NRG Energy, Inc., are C. Luckey McDowell, Esq., and Ian
E. Roberts, Esq., at Baker Botts L.L.P.


GLOBAL AMENITIES: Legal Creditors to Get 100% Without Interest
--------------------------------------------------------------
Global Amenities, LLC, and ASI Holding Company, Inc., filed a
consensual joint disclosure statement dated December 4, 2017, with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina.

Except to the extent that the holder of a particular claim has
agreed to a different treatment, each holder of such class will
receive: (i) if such class has accepted the plan, deferred cash
payments of a value, as of the effective date of the plan, equal to
the allowed amount of such claim, or (ii) if such class has not
accepted the plan, cash on the effective date of the plan equal to
the allowed amount of such claim.

Any person or entity claiming rights under an executory contract or
unexpired lease rejected pursuant to the provisions of the plan or
11 U.S.C. Section 365 shall have 30 days after the confirmation
date to file a proof of claim, or such additional time as the
court, before that date, may allow. Although the plan provides for
full payment of its debts, the plan does not provide for payment of
accrued interests and penalties. Therefore, this class is deemed to
be impaired. All payments to this class will be within 30 days of
the effective date as set forth in the plan of reorganization.

General unsecured creditors will be paid as follows:

     - Non-legal creditors of the debtor will be paid a lump sum
       equal to 100% of their allowed claims without interest and
       penalties, within 90 days of the effective date as set
       forth in the plan.

     - Legal creditors of the debtor will be paid a lump sum
       equal to 100% of their allowed claims without interest and
       penalties, within 180 days of the effective date as set
       forth in the plan.

     - With regards to ASI's claim, the plan provides that an
       initial payment of $250,000.00 has been made to the
       attorney trust account of ASI's attorneys Burr & Forman
       for the benefit of ASI on October 1, 2017, with monthly
       payments of $10,585.53 (amortized with 3% interest
       included, pursuant to an amortization schedule) to ASI,
       beginning on November 15, 2017 and continuing on the 15th
       day of each month thereafter, until the principal amount
       of an additional $450,000.00 is paid in full. Should any
       default under the plan occur, ASI's principal claim will
       be increased to $800,000.00, retroactively, less any
       payments made prior to default.

The debtor's insider unsecured creditors, will be paid a lump sum
equal to 100% of their allowed claims without interest and
penalties, within one year after ASI's claim has been fully
satisfied and paid in full.

Equity owners in the debtor will receive no money, and the members
of the debtor shall retain all of their membership interests
therein.

A full-text copy of the disclosure statement is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/scb16-04635-hb-251.pdf

Global Amenities is represented by:

          Robert A. Pohl, Esq.
          POHL, PA
          32 South Main Street, Suite 215
          Greenville, SC 29601
          Tel: (864) 233-6294
          Fax: (864) 558-5291
          Email: Robert@POHLPA.com

ASI Holding Company is represented by:

          W. Cliff Moore, III, Esq.
          ADAMS AND REESE LLP
          PO Box 2285
          Columbia, SC 29202
          Tel: (803) 254-4190
          Email: cliff.moore@arlaw.com

            -- and --

          Robin B. Cheatham, Esq.
          ADAMS AND REESE LLP
          4500 One Shell Square
          New Orleans, LA 70139
          Tel: (504) 581-3234
          Email: robin.cheatham@arlaw.com

            -- and --

          Edmund S. Whitson, III, Esq.
          BURR & FORMAN, LLP
          201 North Franklin Street
          Suite 3200
          Tampa, FL 33602
          Tel: (813) 221-2626
          Email: ewhitson@burr.com

                     About Global Amenities

Global Amenities, LLC is a South Carolina limited liability
company.  The Debtor was formed on Oct. 28, 2011, with ownership
held 60% by George Andrew Manios and Chris Manios, his brother, and
40% owned by Don Abreu; provided, however, Mr. Abreu retained 50%
of the voting rights with Drew and Chris retaining the remaining
50% of the voting rights.  

The Debtor was originally formed to sell and market DVD services to
the hospitality industry, but expanded its products and services to
include amenity and ticketing services in 2012.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 16-04635) on Sept. 13, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Andrew Manios, managing member.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

Robert A. Pohl, Esq., at POHL, PA, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Pollard PLLC and Nelson
Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP as special litigation counsel.

Louis Manios of Saad & Manios, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
accountant.  John Sfiris of Sfiris Accounting Services provides
financial services to the Debtor.

On Feb. 1, 2017, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.  The plan
proposes to pay general unsecured creditors 100% of their claims
allowed by the court.


GLOBAL AMENITIES: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 23
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina will
consider approval of the Chapter 11 plan for Global Amenities, LLC
at a hearing on Jan. 23, 2018.

The hearing will be held at 10:30 a.m., at the Donald Stuart
Russell Federal Courthouse.

The court will also consider at the hearing final approval of the
company's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
Dec. 7.

The order set a Jan. 16, 2018 deadline for creditors to file their
objections and cast their votes accepting or rejecting the plan.

                      About Global Amenities

Global Amenities, LLC is a South Carolina limited liability
company.  The Debtor was formed on Oct. 28, 2011, with ownership
held 60% by George Andrew Manios and Chris Manios, his brother, and
40% owned by Don Abreu; provided, however, Mr. Abreu retained 50%
of the voting rights with Drew and Chris retaining the remaining
50% of the voting rights.  

The Debtor was originally formed to sell and market DVD services to
the hospitality industry, but expanded its products and services to
include amenity and ticketing services in 2012.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 16-04635) on Sept. 13, 2016.  The
petition was signed by Andrew Manios, managing member.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

Robert A. Pohl, Esq., at POHL, PA, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Pollard PLLC and Nelson
Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP as special litigation counsel.

Louis Manios of Saad & Manios, LLC, serves as the Debtor's
accountant.  John Sfiris of Sfiris Accounting Services provides
financial services to the Debtor.

On Feb. 1, 2017, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.  The plan
proposes to pay general unsecured creditors 100% of their claims
allowed by the court.


GROM SOCIAL ENTERPRISES: Insufficient Cash Cast Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Grom Social Enterprises, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $1.64 million on $2.37 million of
sales for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with
a net loss of $5.22 million on $1.97 million of sales for the same
period in 2016.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company listed a
net loss of $6.02 million on $6.02 million of sales, compared to a
net loss of $10.64 million on $2.48 million of sales for the same
period in the prior year.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $18.94
million, total liabilities of $13.53 million, and a $5.40 million
in total stockholders' equity.

Because the Company does not expect that existing operational cash
flow will be sufficient to fund presently anticipated operations,
this raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.  Therefore, the Company will need to
raise additional funds and is currently exploring alternative
sources of financing.  Historically, the Company has raised capital
through private placements, convertible debentures and officer
loans as an interim measure to finance working capital needs, and
may continue to raise additional capital through sale of Common
Stock or other securities, and obtaining some short-term loans.
The Company will be required to continue to so until its
consolidated operations become profitable.  Also, the Company has,
in the past, paid for consulting services with its Common Stock to
maximize working capital, and intends to continue this practice
where feasible.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/6KD6uL

                  About Grom Social Enterprises

Grom Social Enterprises, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates
social media network designed for children in the United States.
It is also involved in the animation business; and provision of
WebFiltering services to schools and libraries.  The company was
formerly known as Grom Holdings, Inc.  Grom Social Enterprises,
Inc., incorporated in 2015 and is based in Boca Raton, Florida.


GST AUTOLEATHER: Readying APA for Sale of All Assets
----------------------------------------------------
GST Autoleather, Inc., and its affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to authorize the form of the
asset purchase agreement to be signed with the successful bidder
for substantially all assets of the Debtors.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Jan. 17, 201, at 11:00 a.m.
(ET).  The objection deadline is Jan. 10, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

The Company has been actively exploring the sale of substantially
all of its assets since 2015, when, as a result of its strong
financial performance, it received an unsolicited, non-binding
offer to purchase the Company from a foreign strategic buyer.
Unfortunately, the Company's financial performance declined during
this time period, and the interest of would-be buyers waned.
Potential buyers either lowered their valuations or withdrew their
bids or opted to wait and see if the Company's performance
improved.

Unable to reach definitive documentation for an out-of-court sale
transaction, the Debtors commenced chapter 11 cases on Oct. 3,
2017, intending to continue marketing the Company's assets
culminating in a Court-approved sale to the highest or best bidder.
Accordingly, the Debtors sought, and the Court entered on Nov. 15,
2017 the Bid Procedures Order.  The Sale, approval of which is
sought by the Sale Motion, will be to the successful bidder at the
auction provided for in the Bid Procedures, to take place on the
date set forth in, and in accordance with, the Bid Procedures
Order.

In accordance with the Bid Procedures, the Debtors prepared a
proposed form of asset purchase agreement for the contemplated
Sale, which they have made available to potential bidders in their
electronic data room.  To the extent any required information is
not yet known or if the Successful Bidder's APA materially changes
any such required information, the Debtors will make further
disclosure to the Court at or prior to the Sale Hearing.

The salient terms of the Successful Bidder's APA are:

     a. Sale to Insider: The Debtors do not anticipate that the
buyer will be an insider.

     b. Purchase Price: The purchase price will be comprised of
certain Assumed Liabilities and a cash payment.

     c. Assets: All or substantially all assets of the Debtors.

     d. Assumed Liabilities: The Assumed Liabilities listed in
Section. 1.3 of the Form APA.

     e. Assigned Contracts: The Assigned Contracts that will be
listed on Schedule 1.1(a) of the Form APA.

     f. Representations and Warranties: Customary representations
and warranties by the Purchaser and the Seller.

     g. Private Sale/No Competitive Bidding: The Debtors are
pursuing an open Auction and Sale process.

     h. Closing and Other Deadlines: Section 8.1(c) of the Form APA
provides that either the Purchaser or the Company may terminate the
Form APA by written notice if the Closing will not have occurred on
or before the Outside Date.

     i. Good Faith Deposit: An amount in cash equal to 10% of the
Cash Payment.

     j. Use of Proceeds: None

     k. Sale Free and Clear of Unexpired Leases: The Sale is to be
free and clear of all liens and unassumed liabilities, including
unexpired leases that do not constitute Assigned Contracts.

     l. Credit Bid: The Bid Procedures permit any Qualified Bidder
who has a valid and perfected line on any Assets of the Debtors'
estates to submit a credit bid for all or a portion of the value of
such Secured Creditor's claims.

     m. Relief from Bankruptcy Rule 6004 (h): To maximize the value
received for the Assets, the Debtors are seeking to close the
transactions contemplated by the Successful Bidder's APA as soon as
possible after the Sale Hearing.  The Debtors, therefore, have
requested a waiver of the 14-day stay under Bankruptcy Rule
6004(h).

A copy of the Form APA attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/GST_AutoLeather_385_Sales.pdf

The Debtors submit that the Successful Bidder's APA will constitute
the highest or otherwise best offer for the Assets and will allow
them the greatest chance of preserving any going concern value for
their estates.  As such, their determination to sell the Assets
through an Auction process and subsequently to enter into the
Successful Bidder's APA will be a valid and sound exercise of their
business judgment.

The Debtors accordingly ask authority to convey the Assets to the
Successful Bidder arising from the Auction, if any, free and clear
of all liens, claims, rights, interests, charges, and encumbrances,
with any such liens, claims, rights, interests, charges, and
encumbrances to attach to the proceeds of the Sale.

To facilitate and effectuate the Sale of the Assets and enhance the
value to their estate, the Debtors are asking approval of the
assumption and assignment of the Assumed Contracts to the
Successful Bidder upon the Closing of the transactions contemplated
under the Successful Bidder's APA and payment of the cure cost.

To maximize the value received for the Assets, the Debtors ask to
close the Sale as soon as possible after the Sale Hearing.
Accordingly, they ask that the Court waives the 14-day stay period
under Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d).

                     About GST Autoleather

Headquartered in Southfield, Michigan, GST AutoLeather, Inc., was
founded in 1933, then known as Garden State Tanning, initially
operated as a tanning company that processed leather for the
upholstery and garment industries. The Company entered the
automotive industry in 1946.

As of Oct. 3, 2017, the Company employs approximately 5,600 people
worldwide, including the United States, Mexico, Japan, China,
Korea, Germany, Hungary, South Africa, and Argentina.  The Company
supplies leather to virtually every major OEM in the automotive
industry, including Audi, BMW/Mini, Daimler, Fiat Chrysler, Ford,
General Motors, Hyundai, Honda, Porsche, PSA, Nissan, Kia, Toyota
and Volkswagen.

GST AutoLeather, Inc., and five of its affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12100) on Oct. 3,
2017.  The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local bankruptcy
counsel; Lazard Middle Market, LLC as financial advisor; Alvarez &
Marsal North America, LLC as restructuring advisor; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as claims and noticing agent, Ernst &
Young LLP, as tax advisors. Deloitte & Touche LLP, as independent
auditor.

On Oct. 13, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee is
represented by Christopher M. Samis, L. Katherine Good, Aaron H.
Stulman, Christopher A. Jones and David W. Gaffey of Whiteford
Taylor & Preston LLP and Erika L. Morabito, Brittany J. Nelson,
John A. Simon, Richard J. Bernard and Leah Eisenberg of Foley &
Lardner LLP.

Royal Bank of Canada is represented by Andrew V. Tenzer of Paul
Hastings LLP.


GUTIERREZ FURNITURE: Lone Star May Renew & Extend Debt
------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Eduardo V. Rodriguez of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas has entered an agreed order authorizing
Lone Star National Bank to renew and extend the debt of Gutierrez
Furniture & Appliances, LLC.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Dec. 29, 2017, the
Debtor and the Bank asked the Court to approve the renewal and
extension of the Debtor's existing debt.  On May 20, 2013, the
Debtor executed a promissory note in the original principal sum of
$253,000 and payable to the Bank, secured by a deed of trust of
even date therewith covering the following described real
property.

No objections were filed against the agreed motion filed by the
Bank and the Debtor.

The Note described in the Agreed Motion will be renewed and
extended, with a renewal balance of $248,804.19.  The Debtor will
make monthly installments of principal and accrued interest in the
amount of $2,043.04 each on or before the 20th day of each month
commencing Dec. 20, 2017, and continuing to maturity on Nov. 5,
2022, on which date all principal and accrued interest will be due
and payable.  The monthly installment will also include an ad
valorem tax escrow payment in the amount of $458.55 for a total
monthly payment of $2,501.59.  Interest will accrue at the rate of
5.50% per annum, with payments calculated on a 15 year
amortization.

All liens securing the debts also be renewed and extended.  The
Debtor is authorized to execute all documents necessary to
effectuate the renewal of the Note.

A copy of the Order is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-70207-44.pdf

            About Gutierrez Furniture & Appliances

Gutierrez Furniture & Appliances, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
17-70207) on June 5, 2017.  Julian Gutierrez, president and member,
signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of less than $500,000.

Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez presides over the case.

Marcos D. Oliva, Esq., at Marcos D. Oliva, P.C., serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


H MELTON VENTURES: DOJ Watchdog Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Russell F. Nelms of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas directed the U.S. Trustee to appoint a
Chapter 11 Trustee to administer the bankruptcy cases:

        (a) In re H. Melton Ventures, LLC, Case No.
17-43922-RFN-11; and

        (b) In re Henry James Melton, II, Case No. 17-44206.

              About H Melton Ventures, LLC

H Melton Ventures LLC, based in Arlington, Texas, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-43922) on Sept. 28, 2017,
estimating $1 million to $10 million in both assets and
liabilities. The petition was signed by Michael Warden, its
manager. Chapter 11 petitions were also filed by Michael G. Warden
(Case No. 17-33888) and Henry J. Melton, II (Case No. 17-44206).

The Hon. Russell F. Nelms presides over the case.

David D. Ritter, Esq., at Ritter Spencer PLLC, serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Holding Company, H Melton Ventures, LLC.  The
Debtors, Henry J. Melton II and H. Melton Ventures RD, LLC, hired
Wiley Law Group, PLLC, as counsel.


HAHN HOTELS: Pilgrim Bank, et al., Oppose Approval of Plan Outline
------------------------------------------------------------------
Pilgrim Bank asked the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Texas to deny the disclosure statement filed by Hahn
Hotels of Sulphur Springs LLC, saying it does not contain "adequate
information."

In its objection, the bank said the means by which Hahn Hotels will
pay its creditors were not clearly disclosed in the document.

According to Pilgrim Bank, what the company disclosed is a list of
options, which include selling the La Quinta hotel; refinancing the
bank's claim; and transferring the La Quinta to the bank in
satisfaction of its claim.

"That is not a disclosure of what the debtors will do, it is a
disclosure of what the debtors may choose to do before the plan's
effective date," Pilgrim Bank said.

The bank also argued the disclosure statement does not adequately
describe the available assets and their current values, and the
risks posed to creditors under the plan.

The disclosure statement had also drawn objections from Leinart
Construction Inc., La Quinta Franchising LLC, and Haier US
Appliance Solutions Inc.  These creditors also criticized the
company's failure to provide "adequate information" in its
disclosure statement.

Pilgrim Bank is represented by:

     Scott A. Ritcheson, Esq.
     Ritcheson, Lauffer & Vincent, P.C.
     821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 530
     Tyler, TX 75701
     Tel: 903 535-2900
     Fax: 903 533-8646
     Email: scottr@rllawfirm.net

Haier US Appliance is represented by:

     Worthy Walker, Esq.
     Shackelford, Bowen, McKinley & Norton, LLP  
     9201 N. Central Expressway, Fourth Floor  
     Dallas, TX 75231  
     Tel: (214) 780-1400  
     Fax: (214) 780-1401
     Email: wwalker@shackelfordlaw.net

Leinart Construction is represented by:

     M. Jermaine Watson, Esq.
     M.J. Watson & Associates, P.C.
     325 N. Saint Paul Street, Suite 2200
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Tel: (214) 965-8240
     Fax: (214) 999-1384
     Email: jwatson@mjwatsonlaw.com

La Quinta Franchising is represented by:

     Gregory G. Hesse, Esq.
     Hunton & Williams LLP
     1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 3700
     Dallas, TX 75202
     Tel: (214) 979-3000
     Fax: (214) 880-0011
     Email: ghesse@hunton.com  
     Email: ncollins@hunton.com

          - and -

     Shannon E. Daily, Esq.
     Hunton & Williams LLP
     Riverfront Plaza, East Tower
     951 East Byrd Street
     Richmond, VA 23219
     Tel: (804) 788-8200
     Fax: (804) 788-8218
     Email: sdaily@hunton.com

                         About Hahn Hotels

Headquartered in Sulphur Springs, Texas, Hahn Hotels of Sulphur
Springs, LLC, owns the La Quinta Inns and Suites, which provides
hotel accommodations for business and leisure travelers across the
United States, Canada, and Mexico.

Hahn Hotels of Sulphur Springs, LLC, along with its affiliates,
including Hahn Investments, LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. E.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-40947) on May 1, 2017.  The
petitions were signed by Dante Hahn, president.

Hahn Hotels of Sulphur estimated its assets and liabilities between
$1 million and $10 million.  Hahn Investments estimated its assets
and liabilities between $10 million and $50 million.

Judge Brenda T. Rhoades presides over the cases.

Jessica Leigh Voyce Lewis, Esq., and Judith W. Ross, Esq., at The
Law Offices of Judith W. Ross and Eric Soderlund, Esq., who has an
office in Dallas, Texas, serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


HELIX TCS: Anticipated Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------
Helix TCS, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $255,357 on $1,129,746 of revenue for the
three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with a net loss of
$371,785 on $612,017 of revenue for the same period in 2016.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $4.88
million, total liabilities of $3.29 million, and a $1.59 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Management believes that it will continue to incur losses for the
immediate future.  Therefore, the Company may either need
additional equity or debt financing until it can achieve
profitability and positive cash flows from operating activities, if
ever.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company had a cash balance of
$130,125, accounts receivable, net of $558,141 and $3,243,572 in
current liabilities.  At the current cash consumption rate, the
Company will need to consider additional funding sources toward the
end of fiscal 2017.  The Company is taking proactive measures to
reduce operating expenses, drive growth in revenue and
expeditiously resolve any remaining legal matters.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/JPrgWO

                        About Helix TCS

Based in Greenwood Village, Colorado, Helix TCS, Inc., provides its
clients with marijuana security services, including providing armed
and unarmed site security services and security guards.


INCA REFINING: Disclosure Statement Hearing Set for Jan. 25
-----------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana is
set to hold a hearing on Jan. 25, at 2:00 p.m., to consider
approval of the disclosure statement, which explains the Chapter 11
plan of liquidation for INCA Refining, LLC.

The hearing will take place at the Hale Boggs Federal Building,
Courtroom B-705.  Objections are due by Jan. 18, 2018.

                      About Inca Refining LLC

INCA Refining, LLC was organized in Texas in 2005 for the purpose
of developing and operating an oil refinery in Louisiana.  INCA
owns an 80% membership interest in Refinery Equipment Holdings, a
Delaware limited liability company, and the remaining 20% is owned
by Del Mar Onshore Partners L.P. entities.  INCA also holds
property in Egan, Louisiana.

West Bank Land Company LLC was organized in Texas in 2008 for the
purpose of acquiring land to be developed by INCA into an oil
refinery. West Bank owns the St. James Property, leased by INCA for
a refinery.

In 2010, White Oak Global Advisors, LLC, entered into two funding
agreements with INCA and West Bank on behalf of the White Oak
Creditors.  The current total indebtedness owed to the White Oak
Creditors is now in excess of $102,000,000.

Involuntary Chapter 11 petitions were filed against INCA Refining,
LLC, and West Bank Land Company LLC (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No.
17-11182 and 17-11183) on May 9, 2017.  The petitioning creditors
were White Oak Strategic Master Fund, L.P., and related entities.

Pursuant to orders for relief, the Debtors are and have been
debtors-in-possession with control over administration of their
estates pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1107.

The case is assigned to Judge Jerry A. Brown.

The White Oak Entities own the majority of the membership interests
in each of the Debtors, control the majority of managers of the
Board, and have creditor claims against each of the Debtors in
excess of $102 million secured by a third mortgage on the real
estate in St. James Parish, Louisiana.

The White Oak Entities sought appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee
in each case.  Following an Aug. 2, 2017, hearing, the Court
entered an order denying the appointment request.

On December 5, 2017, the Debtors filed their proposed Chapter 11
plan of liquidation and disclosure statement.


INDUSTRIE SERVICE: Jan. 23 Disclosure Statement Hearing
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Helen E. Burris of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of South Carolina set the hearing for the approval of Industrie
Service, LLC's disclosure statement to January 23, 2018 at 10:30
a.m.

January 16, 2018 is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the disclosure statement.

A full-text copy of Judge Burris' order dated December 4, 2017 is
available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/scb17-02995-hb-73.pdf

Industrie Service is represented by:

          G. William McCarthy, Jr.
          PO Box 11332
          Columbia, SC 29211-1332.

                   About Industrie Service LLC

Industrie Service, LLC, is a service establishment equipment
company maintaining an office located at 230 Brookshire Road,
Greer, South Carolina. The Debtor began operations in 1998 as an
American subsidiary of a German parent Industrie Service, GmbH. The
Debtor was formed to do business in Greenville, South Carolina area
to perform supporting projects in connection with the BMW plant
located there.

The Debtor became a registered E-2 Treaty Investor with the US
Department of State in Frankfurt, Germany which allowed the Debtor
to obtain visas for employees to enter the United States.

In 2009, the Debtor received major contracts to perform work on the
then newest German automotive plant in the southeast, i.e., the
Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee in 2009 ("VW Plant
Project"). Two of the prime contractors for the VW Plant,
Stotzfredenhagen Industries, Inc. and Moll Systems US, Inc. awarded
sub-contracts to the Debtor to provide the structural steel on two
assembly lines for the VW Plant. The VW Plant Project was a
troubled affair for all involved. The completion of the physical
shell was delayed by months, resulting in Volkswagen Group of
America, Inc. ordering acceleration of the later phases of
construction and line installation.

In January 2011, Debtor filed suit against Stotz in the Chancery
Court of Tennessee for the Eleventh Judicial District at
Chattanooga, which case is captioned as Industrie Service, LLC v.
Stotzfredenhagen Industries, Inc., et al., case No. 11-0052, ("VW
Litigation"). The VW Litigation remains pending, but has been
stayed and put on an administrative hold by the Tennessee Chancery
Court as a result of the bankruptcy filings by Stotz and the
Debtor.

Fabrication & Mechanical Service, LLC ("FMS") was formed as a South
Carolina limited liability company on April 10, 2014.  Clarissa
Blum is the sole owner of FMS. Following the break from Industrie
Service, GmbH, EquipMax Finance, LLC ("EMF") was formed to lease
necessary equipment and real property for operations to the Debtor
for use in providing service to FMS. EMF is owned by Florian Gleibs
who is employed in the administration of the Debtor.

During the period from 2011 through 2016, the Debtor operated on
loans from the Clarissa Blum, Hansjuergen Blum, Binder & Blum,
EquipMax Finance, and FMS in excess of $4 million dollars in order
to maintain essential operations.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 17-02995) on June 16, 2017.
Hansjuergen Blum, chief director officer and owner, signed the
petition.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $1.58
million in assets and $9.2 million in liabilities.

Judge Helen E. Burris presides over the case. McCarthy, Reynolds &
Penn LLC is the Debtor's legal counsel.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Industrie Service, LLC, as of
July 13, according to a court docket.

On June 16, 2017, the Debtor filed an Adversary Complaint against
the United States of America requesting injunctive relief, such
that the IRS would no longer be able to levy upon the accounts of
FMS. The adversary proceeding was styled as Industrie Service, LLC
v. United States of America, Adv. Pro. No. 17-80059-hb.


INMOBILIARIA LEGUISAMO: Plan Hearing Set for Jan. 25
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico is set to
hold a hearing on Jan. 25, 2018, to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Inmobiliaria Leguisamo Inc.

The hearing will be held at 9:30 a.m., at the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court, Southwestern Divisional Office, MCS Building, Second Floor.

The court had earlier approved the company's disclosure statement,
allowing it to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Edward Godoy on Dec. 7, required
creditors to file their objections and cast their votes accepting
or rejecting the plan on or before 14 days prior to the Jan. 25
hearing.

                   About Inmobiliaria Leguisamo

Inmobiliaria Leguisamo Inc. owns a commercial building in Mayaguez,
Puerto Rico.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 16-00123) on Jan. 13, 2016. The Debtor
is represented by Nydia Gonzalez Ortiz, Esq., at Santiago &
Gonzalez Law, LLC.


INNERSCOPE HEARING: Capital Deficit Raises Going Concern Doubt
--------------------------------------------------------------
InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc., filed its quarterly report
on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $279,403 on $104,781 of
total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017,
compared with a net income of $90,743 on $689,818 of total revenues
for the same period in 2016.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $1,406,329,
total liabilities of $2,219,444, and a $813,115 in total
stockholders' deficit.

The Company experienced net losses from continuing operations of
$279,403, and $1,189,635 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017, respectively.  At September 30, 2017, the
Company had a working capital deficit of $1,052,500, and an
accumulated deficit of $1,063,315.  These factors raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern
and to operate in the normal course of business.

Through August 5, 2016, the Company was dependent on the Marketing
Agreement with MFHC, (the Company and MFHC agreed to cancel the
Marketing Agreement which generated approximately 43% and 70%,
respectively, of the Company's revenues for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2016, as a result of the sale by MFHC of
substantially all of their assets) and is now dependent on the sale
of its services to third parties and the Consulting Agreement.  On
May 2, 2017, the Company received a demand that all monies paid
pursuant to the Consulting Agreement be returned.  On May 26, 2017,
the Company and the Moores were named in an action filed that
includes a demand that all monies paid pursuant to the Consulting
Agreement be returned.  The Company believes the claim is frivolous
and without merit, as well as not providing sufficient cause for
the Agreement to be terminated.  The Company has filed a
countersuit for breach of contract, demanding that all monies owed
to it, pursuant to the Consulting Agreement, be paid, together with
interest thereon.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/CV0QIk

              About InnerScope Hearing Technologies

InnerScope Hearing Technologies, Inc., provides marketing and
advertising services for the retail hearing aid dispensing
community.  The company offers a range of services in the areas of
advertising/marketing, customer relationship management, public
relations, and specialty communications.


INPIXON: Working Capital Deficit Casts Going Concern Doubt
----------------------------------------------------------
Inpixon filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q, disclosing a net
loss of $14.64 million on $11.92 million of total revenues for the
three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with a net loss of
$4.72 million on $11.24 million of total revenues for the same
period in 2016.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded
a net loss of $27.13 million on $40.50 million of total revenues,
compared to a net loss of $13.20 million on $38.66 million of total
revenues for the same period last year.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $35.20
million, total liabilities of $51.67 million, and a $16.46 million
in total stockholders' deficit.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company has a working capital
deficiency of approximately $30.8 million.  For the nine months
ended September 30, 2017, the Company incurred a net loss of
approximately $27.1 million.  The aforementioned factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a
going concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/KwpVSV

                         About Inpixon

Inpixon, through its subsidiaries, provides big data analytics and
location based products and related services for the cyber-security
and Internet of things markets worldwide.  The Company was formerly
known as Sysorex Global and changed its name to Inpixon in March
2017.  Inpixon is headquartered in Palo Alto, California.


IRASEL SAND: Unsecureds to Get Full Payment in 20 Quarters
----------------------------------------------------------
Irasel Sands, LLC, has filed a disclosure statement dated December
4, 2017 with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Texas.

General unsecured creditor claims, estimated by the debtor to total
$3,076,312.51, will be paid in full in 20 equal quarterly
installments of $166,215.11 beginning on March 31, 2018 and on the
31st of each quarter thereafter until paid in full.  These claims
will bear interest at the rate of 3% per annum.

Each holder of a priority tax claim must receive the present value
of such claim, in regular installments, paid over a period not
exceeding 5 years from the order of relief, unless the holder of
such priority tax claim agrees otherwise.

Allowed administrative claims of professionals and the U.S. Trustee
will be paid in cash and in full on the effective date of the plan
unless otherwise agreed to.

The claim of Summit Investment Management in the approximate amount
of $4,253,875.53 secured by various assets of the debtor, is held
by the claimant as an assignment from FDIC.  To the extent the
claim is allowed and is secured, the debtor will pay this claim in
monthly payments of $60,123.89 for 60 months which includes
interest at 5% per annum.

With regards to the claim of Frio County in the amount of
$41,260.68, the debtor proposes, to the extent the claim is
allowed, to pay $1,086,55 for 48 months from the petition date of
June 19, 2017.  This claim will bear interest at 21% per annum.

As to the claim of La Salle County in the amount of $17,420.92, the
debtor proposes, to the extent the claim is allowed, to pay $458.76
for 48 months from the petition date.  The claim will bear interest
at 12% per annum.

As to the claim of Dilley ISD in the amount of $66,118.62, the
debtor proposes, to the extent the claim is allowed, to pay
$1,741.16 for 48 months from the petition date.  The claim will
bear interest at 12% per annum.

The secured claim of Carousel Specialty Products, Inc. asserted in
the amount of $2,472,975.16 is disputed. To the extent it is
allowed and secured, subject to the conditions for allowance and
initial payment date, the debtor will pay this claim in monthly
payments of $25,000 per month with interest at 5% per month until
the allowed claim is paid in full.

The unsecured claims of Carousel Specialties Products in the amount
of $643,998.21 and $10,080,000.00 are disputed, unliquidated and
contingent.

The convenience class of unsecured claims who have claims that do
not exceed $10,000 or those who elect to limit their total claim to
$10,000, shall be paid 75% of their allowed claim in cash without
interest within 90 days of the effective date.

Select Sands, LLC has filed a claim in the amount of $77,216.96,
but is disputed by the debotor. Irabel, Inc. is owed the sum of
$1,149,816.91. Both Irabel and Select Sands are currently members
of the debtor. These claims, if allowed, shall be paid 10
semi-annual installments and shall bear interest at 3% per annum.

Irasel Sands proposes to fund the plan through operations, remain
in business and provide a dividend to its creditors.

A full-text copy of Irasel Sands disclosure statement is available
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb17-51420-rbk-225.pdf

Irasel Sands is represented by:

          Dean W. Greer, Esq.
          2929 Mossrock, Suite 117
          San Antonio, TX 78230
          Tel: (210)342-7100
          Fax: (210)342-3633
          
                      About Irasel Sand LLC

Based in Dilley, Texas, Irasel Sand, LLC, is a company that was
organized in 2014 as a joint venture between Irabel, Inc., and
Select Sand LLC.  The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 17-51420) on June
19, 2017.  Louis R. Butler, CEO of managing member, signed the
petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Dean William Greer, Esq., at the Law Offices of Dean W. Greer serve
as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Judge Ronald B. King presides over the case.

The Debtor previously filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 17-31148) on Feb. 27, 2017.


JANICE STEINER: Proposes Online Auction of Personal Property
------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor Janice M. Steiner asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland to authorize the sale of numerous pieces of
furniture and accessories located at 1209 Atlantic Avenue, Unit
201, Ocean City, Maryland via an online auction.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 14 days from the date of
service of the Notice.

At the time of the filing of the petition, the Debtor owned two
condominium units located at 1209 Atlantic Avenue, Ocean City,
Maryland.  Prior to the filing of the petition the Debtor, from
time to time, she held the Units out for the production of beach
vacation seasonal rental income.  From time to time, she purchased
and has accumulated numerous pieces of furniture and accessories
appropriate to such beach vacation rental units.  The Debtor has
marshaled all of the Personal Property from the Units into Unit
201.  

Prior to the filing of the Motion, the Debtor consented to the
motion for relief from automatic stay filed by Severn Savings Bank,
the then-holder of the first lien positions on the Units.  

In an effort to recover as much money as possible for the benefit
of the estate and her Creditors, the Debtor consulted with
auctioneers familiar with the auction sale of similar Personal
Property.  After consulting with several auctioneers, she selected
Dave Allen and Allen & Marshall Auctioneers and Appraisers, LLC,
8000 Esham Rd, Parsonsburg, Maryland; www.AMauctions.com as the
auctioneer most qualified to conduct an auction sale of her
Personal Property.  The Debtor has or will simultaneously with the
Motion file an emergency application to employ the Auctioneer.  The
copy of the proposed OnLine Only Auction Contract is attached to
the Application.

The Auctioneer opined that the Debtor's Personal Property may
produce an auction sale price in excess of the scheduled amounts,
and further that such auction sale should be conducted on an Online
Only basis, with the Personal Property remaining on location.  The
reason for the latter is that interested purchasers are likely to
be owners or managers of similar Ocean City vacation rentals.

There is no known appraisal of any of the Personal Property.  There
are no known liens, encumbrances or security interests in or
against it.  The Debtor thinks this is best interests of the estate
and its Creditors to pursue the Online Only Auction.  The orderly
auction sale presents the best opportunity to liquidate as much as
possible of the Personal Property and convert it to cash for the
benefit of the bankruptcy estate.  All fees due to the Auctioneer
are and will remain subject to further order of the Court.

All auction sales proceeds remaining after payment of all Court
approved costs and fees will be placed in the Debtor's DIP account.
The Debtor will file a report of the auction sale within 10 days
after the sale or at such time as the Court may otherwise direct.
Pursuant to Local Rule 9013-2, she will not file a separate
memorandum of law in support of the Motion and will rely solely
upon the written motion.

Janice M. Steiner sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Md. Case
No. 17-15076) on April 11, 2017.

Counsel for the Debtor:

          John C. Gordon, Esq.
          736 Ticonderoga Ave.
          Severna Park, MD 21146
          Telephone: (410) 340-0808
          Facsimile: (410) 544-1244
          E-mail: johngordon@me.com
                  jcglaw@icloud.com


JOHNS TRUCKING: Unsecureds to be Paid $1,000 Per Month for 36 Mos
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah is set to hold a
hearing on Jan. 16, at 11:00 a.m., to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Johns Trucking Inc.

Under the proposed plan, creditors holding Class 9 non-priority
unsecured claims will be paid through the pro rata distribution of
monthly installments in the amount of $1,000 for 36 months.
Payments will start 30 days after the effective date of the plan.

No interest will be paid on Class 9 non-priority unsecured claims,
which are estimated at $344,703, according to Johns Trucking's
disclosure statement, which explains its proposed plan.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/utb17-20954-43.pdf

                      About Johns Trucking

Johns Trucking Inc. was organized in 1991 and operates a trucking
business in Utah.

Johns Trucking sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Utah Case No. 17-20954) on Feb. 13, 2017.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $1
million.

The case is assigned to Judge R. Kimball Mosier.  Andres Diaz,
Esq., and Timothy J. Larsen, Esq., at Diaz & Larsen, in Salt Lake
City, Utah, serve as counsel to the Debtor.  

No trustee, examiner or creditors' committee has been appointed in
the case.


LAYNE CHRISTENSEN: Accelerating Maturity Raises Going Concern Doubt
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Layne Christensen Company filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $2.08 million on $127.42 million of
revenues for the three months ended October 31, 2017, compared with
a net loss of $5.04 million on $120.57 million of revenues for the
same period in 2016.

At October 31, 2017, the Company had total assets of $389.47
million, total liabilities of $335.43 million, and a $54.04 million
in total stockholders' equity.

With respect to the Company's 4.25% Convertible Notes, they have
retained advisors to assist them in evaluating alternatives and
raising capital to refinance or extend their debt to a date beyond
October 15, 2019, and eliminate the accelerating maturity
provisions of the 8.0% Convertible Notes.  The Company believes the
refinance or extension of its debt is likely based on current
on-going discussions with existing and new potential lenders, the
Company's improving financial performance and credit quality, and
the fact that its stock price is above the $11.70 conversion price
for the 8.0% Convertible Notes.  Although the Company believe these
refinancing options are viable and likely, because its plans to
refinance or restructure its debt have not been finalized, and
therefore not in their control (in part, due to the fact that
neither of our Convertible Notes can be prepaid or have redemption
provisions prior to February 2018), these plans are not considered
probable under the new standard.  Consequently, per the standard,
these conditions, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern within one
year after the date these financial statements are filed.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/PrIwta

                   About Layne Christensen Co.

Layne Christensen Company is a water management, construction and
drilling company.  The Company provides drilling solutions for
water management, mineral services and specialty drilling needs.
The Company operates through three segments: Water Resources,
Inliner and Mineral Services.



LECTRUS CORP:  $6-Million Credit Bid to Open March 7 Auction
------------------------------------------------------------
Lectrus Corp. and its affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Tennessee to authorize the bidding
procedures in connection with the sale of substantially all assets
to Lectrus Holdings, LLC, for $6,000,000 credit bid, plus the cure
costs, plus the assumption of certain liabilities of the Debtors,
subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Jan. 18, 2018, at 10:30 a.m.

The Debtors believe that, given the nature of the industry in which
they operate, and the status of their current operations, it is
imperative to sell substantially all of their assets.  This
timeline is also dictated by the "Milestones" as provided in the
Interim DIP Order.  In addition to rendering an "Event of Default"
as provided in the Interim DIP Order, the failure to consummate a
sale would lead to increased administrative expenses and a possible
fire sale of the Debtors' equipment and other assets (assuming
their assets could be sold under such conditions) in order to fund
continuing expenses.

Lectrus Holdings LLC has agreed to serve as a stalking horse bidder
for certain assets of the Debtors.  As consideration for the
Purchased Assets, and as more fully described in the Stalking Horse
APA, Lectrus Holdings will: (i) provide a credit bid in the amount
of $6,000,000; plus (ii) the Cure Costs; plus (iii) the assumption
of certain liabilities of the Debtors.  The Sale will be free and
clear of any and all liens, claims and encumbrances.

The Stalking Horse APA is not conditioned on the Court's approval
of any bid protections or contingencies, such as a break-up fee,
termination fee, expense reimbursement or similar type of payment.
The Purchased Assets constitute substantially all of the Debtors'
assets, but do not include estate causes of actions.

In the event that the Stalking Horse Bidder is not a Successful
Bidder(s), upon entry of the Sale Order, all proceeds from the
Sale, net of fees to Livingstone Partners, LLC that are approved by
the Court, will be remitted to Great American Life Insurance Co.,
Great American Insurance Co., HD Special Situations II, LP and HD
Special Situations III, LP ("DIP Lenders") upon the Closing,
without further order of the Court.

In connection with maximizing the value of their estates, the
Debtors propose to establish reasonable bid and sales procedures in
order to solicit higher and better cash offers for the Purchased
Assets and to provide for an auction, if necessary.  To that end,
they ask entry of an order establishing Bidding Procedures and an
order authorizing the sale of the Purchased Assets to Lectrus
Holdings or such other party (or parties) that may submit a higher
and better offer for the Purchased Assets.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: March 2, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Minimum Bid: The bid (i) that is not materially more
burdensome or conditional than the transaction with the Stalking
Horse Bidder pursuant to the Stalking Horse APA; and (ii) that has
a cash value of not less than $6,250,000

     c. Good Faith Deposit: not less than $150,000

     d. Auction: If one or more Qualified Overbids is received by
the Bid Deadline, the Debtors will conduct the Auction with respect
to the Purchased Assets, to occur on March 7, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
(ET) at the offices of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &
Berkowitz, PC, 633 Chestnut Street, Suite 1900, Chattanooga,
Tennessee, or such other location as may be determined by the
Debtors and communicated to the Qualified Overbidders at least 48
hours prior to the Auction.

     e. Bid Increments: $50,000

     f. Sale Hearing: March 8, 2018 at (TBD)(subject to the Court's
availability)

     g. Outside Closing Date: March 31, 2018

A copy of the Stalking Horse APA and the Bidding Procedures
attached to the Motion is available for free at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/Lectrus_Corp_75_Sales.pdf

To facilitate and affect the sale of assets, the Debtors ask
authority to assume and assign the identified Assumed Contracts to
the Stalking Horse Bidder (or such other Successful Bidder(s) as
may be selected in accordance with the Bidding Procedures).
Objections, if any, to the proposed assumption and assignment of
the Assumed Contracts must be filed by March 6, 2018 at 3:00 p.m.

The Purchaser:

          LECTRUS HOLDINGS, LLC
          c/o Great American Life Insurance Co.
          and Great American Insurance Co.
          301 East Fourth Street
          27th Floor
          Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
          Attn: Joseph A. Haverkamp
          E-mail: jhaverkamp@amfin.com

                    - and -

          LECTRUS HOLDINGS, LLC
          c/o HD Special Situations II, LP
          and HD Special Situations III, LP
          One Maritime Plaza, Suite 825
          San Francisco CA 94111
          Attn: Todd Blankfort
          E-mail: todd@hdcorp.com

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Ronald E. Gold, Esq.
          FROST BROWN TODD, LLC
          3300 Great American Tower
          301 East Fourth Street
          Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
          Facsimile: (513) 651-6981
          E-mail: rgold@fbtlaw.com

The DIP Lenders:

          LIVINGSTONE PARTNERS, LLC
          443 North Park Clark St.
          Chicago, IL 60654

          GREAT AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
          and GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE CO.
          Attn: Joseph Haverkamp
          301 East Fourth Street, 27th Floor
          Cincinnati, OH 45202-4257

          HD SPECIAL SITUATIONS II, LP and
          HD SPECIAL SITUATIONS III, LP
          Attn: Todd Blankfort
          One Maritime Plaza, Suite 825
          San Francisco, CA 94111-3418

                     About Lectrus Corporation

Based in Chattanooga, Tennessee, Lectrus Corporation --
http://www.lectrus.com/-- designs and manufactures custom metal
enclosures and electrical and mechanical integration serving the
power, oil and gas, renewable energy, industrial, water and
wastewater, transportation, military, mining, data centers,
institutional, and commercial markets.  The company has two
manufacturing facilities located in North America.

Lectrus Corp. and parent Lectrus Holding Corporation sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D.
Tex. Lead Case No. 17-15588) on Dec. 7, 2017.  James P. Beers, vice
president of finance, signed the petitions.

At the time of the filing, Lectrus disclosed assets of $13.34
million and liabilities of $35.26 million.  Lectrus Holding
disclosed zero assets and liabilities totaling $20.55 million.

Judge Nicholas W. Whittenburg presides over the cases.

The Debtors tapped Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz,
PC, as counsel.



LISA LORD: S.J. Zayler Appointed Chapter 11 Trustee
---------------------------------------------------
William T. Neary, U.S. Trustee for Region 6, files with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas a Notice of the
Appointment of Stephen J. Zayler as Chapter 11 Trustee for the
estate of Lisa Lord, Inc.

Mr. Zayler's contact information is:

            Stephen J. Zayler
            P.O. Box 150743
            Lufkin, Texas 75915-0743
            Phone: (936) 634-1020
            Fax: (936) 634-1050
            Email: zayler@suddenlinkmail.com

The initial bond for the trustee will be set at $20,000.

The U.S. Trustee is represented by:

            Timothy W. O'Neal, Esq.
            Office of the U.S. Trustee
            300 Plaza Tower
            110 N. College
            Tyler, Texas 75702
            Phone: (903) 590-1450 Ext. 215
            Fax: (903) 590-1461

                     About Lisa Lord Inc.

Lisa Lord, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D. Tex. Case No. 17-10339) on June 9, 2017, disclosing assets and
liabilities under $500,000. The petition was signed by Lisa
Pederson, president. The Debtor is represented by Robert E. Barron,
Esq., at Barron and Barron LLP.


MACAVITY COMPANY: Jan. 30 Amended Plan Confirmation Hearing
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Brenda K. Martin of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Arizona approved Macavity Company, LLC's amended
disclosure statement, dated Dec. 20, 2017, referring to an amended
plan also dated Dec. 20, 2017.

The hearing to consider the confirmation of the Plan will be held
at the United States Bankruptcy Court, 230 N. First Avenue, 7th
Floor, Courtroom 701, Phoenix, Arizona Jan. 30, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.

Ballots accepting or rejecting the plan must be received by the
Plan Proponent at least seven days prior to the hearing date set
for the confirmation of the Plan by Jan. 23, 2018.

The last day for filing with the Court and serving written
objections to confirmation of the plan is fixed at seven days prior
to the hearing date set for confirmation of the plan by Jan. 23,
2018.

                  About Macavity Company LLC

Macavity Company, LLC, develops real estate properties.  It was
incorporated in 2008 and is based in Mesa, Arizona.  It has a fee
simple interest in an 861.50-acre undeveloped land located at NW
Corner of Monte Carlo Boulevard and FM 75, Princeton, Texas, valued
at $28 million.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case No. 17-08474) on July 24, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Lane Spencer of Ready RDC LLC, sole member.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $28.12 million in
assets and $17.29 million in liabilities.

Judge Brenda K. Martin presides over the case.

Gallagher & Kennedy, PA represents the Debtor as bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtor hired CBRE Inc. as appraiser; and MCA
Financial Group Ltd. as financial advisor.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Macavity Company LLC as of Aug.
29, according to a court docket.


MACK INDUSTRIES: Bid Deadline Set for January 12
------------------------------------------------
Ronald R. Peterson, the Chapter 7 trustee of the estates of Mack
Industries Ltd., Mack Industries II LLC, Mack Industries III LLC,
Mack Industries IV LLC, and Oak Park Avenue Realty Ltd., will be
soliciting bids for the sale and purchase of certain parcels and
lots of real estate of interests in real estate owned by the the
companies.

For more information of the bidding and sale process, email
mackbankruptcy@jenner.com to request a copy of the full notice of
bidding and sale procedures on or before Jan. 4, 2018, at 5:00 p.m.
(CST).  Request for bidding packets will be due by or before Jan.
5, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. (CST), and that initial bids will be due no
later than 5:00 p.m. (CST) on Jan. 12, 2018.

                     About Mack Industries

Headquartered in Tinley Park, Illinois, Mack Industries, Ltd. --
http://www.mackcompanies.com/-- provides real estate management
services.  Mack owns, develops, constructs, leases, and manages
real estate properties.  MACK serves customers in the State of
Illinois.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Ill. Case No. 17-09308) on March 24, 2017, estimating its assets at
$1 million to $10 million and liabilities at $10 million to $50
million.

Judge Carol A. Doyle presides over the case.  Eric G. Zelazny,
Esq., at the Law Offices Of Eric G. Zelazny has served as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

On May 11, 2017, the court approved the appointment of Ronald R.
Peterson as Chapter 11 trustee for the Debtor.  Jenner & Block LLP
represents the trustee as bankruptcy counsel.


MANN REALTY: Double M Can Proceed with State Litigation
-------------------------------------------------------
Mann Realty Associates, Inc., in the case captioned MANN REALTY
ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. DOUBLE M DEVELOPMENT, Appellee, No.
1:17-cv-1225 (M.D. Pa.) appeals a June 29, 2017, order of the
Honorable Robert N. Opel, II, of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Pennsylvania, which order denied reconsideration
of an order issued on May 11, 2017, granting Appellee Double M
Development relief from stay and permitting Double M to proceed
with state court litigation in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin
County. Mann Realty filed a timely Notice of Appeal on July 12,
2017. District Judge John E. Jones affirms the Reconsideration
Order of the Bankruptcy Court.

Mann Realty argues that the Bankruptcy Court did not have
jurisdiction to lift the automatic stay and permit Double M and the
Grantor Retained Annuity Trust ("GRAT") to litigate a state action
related to the Property. Mann Realty further argues that the Lift
Stay Order only permitted the state court action to proceed but did
not authorize the sale of the Property.

Mann Realty further argues that although Double M's request for
relief is a "core" proceeding, the underlying state action was not
"related to" the bankruptcy. The Court finds Mann Realty's argument
to be unpersuasive. First, it is bewildering to suggest that a
request for relief is a core proceeding, but the actual relief
itself -- the state court proceeding being permitted to move
forward -- is unrelated to the bankruptcy proceeding. Nevertheless,
the Court finds that Judge Opel's determination in this matter was
not an abuse of discretion. Judge Opel accurately noted that the
dispute about the Property was a matter of Pennsylvania real estate
law, that the state courts had 20 years of exposure to this matter,
and that the state trial and appellate courts had all determined
that Mann Realty was indistinguishable from the GRAT and, thus,
Mann Realty not being named in the litigation was essentially
inconsequential. The state court had ruled that the conveyance of
the Property to Mann Realty was improper and in contravention of
court orders and had specifically ordered Mann Realty to convey the
Property back to the GRAT so that it could be conveyed to Double M.
Certainly, the outcome of the state proceeding would have an effect
on the bankruptcy estate. The Court, therefore, finds that the
bankruptcy court had jurisdiction to order the relief granted.

Mann Realty's second argument is equally unavailing. The Court
agrees that the Lift Stay Order did not authorize the sale of the
Property; however, that is of no moment. The Property was not sold
by the U.S. Trustee pursuant to Bankruptcy Court authorization. The
Property was sold at a sheriff's sale pursuant to a judgment
obtained through the underlying state court litigation that was
executed against the Property. The Lift Stay Order permitted the
state court litigation to proceed to its conclusion. The Court
fails to see, therefore, how the sale violated the Lift Stay
Order.

Having found that the Lift Stay Order was not an abuse of
discretion, the Court sees no basis for finding that the
Reconsideration Order was such an abuse and, therefore, was not
clear error or manifestly unjust. Furthermore, Mann Realty pointed
to no intervening, controlling case law, nor to any evidence not
previously available.

A full-text copy of Judge Jones' Dec. 19, 2017 Memorandum Decision
is available at https://is.gd/uSG1vn from Leagle.com.

Double M. Development, Appellant, represented by Lawrence V. Young
-- lyoung@cgalaw.com -- CGA Law Firm.

Mann Realty Association, Appellee, represented by Craig A. Diehl,
Law Offices of Craig A. Diehl.

U.S. Trustee, Trustee, represented by Anne K. Fiorenza, Office of
the United States Trustee.

                About Mann Realty Associates, Inc.

Headquartered in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, Mann Realty Associates,
Inc., filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D. Pa.
Case No. 17-01334) on March 31, 2017, estimating its assets at
between $10 million and $50 million and its debts at between $1
million and $10 million. The petition was signed by Robert M.
Mumma, II, its president.

Judge Robert N. Opel II presides over the case.

Craig A. Diehl, Esq., at the Law Offices of Craig A. Diehl, serves
as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

Mann Realty previously filed a voluntary petition under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Pa. Case No. 17-00080) on Jan.
10, 2017. The petition was a "pro se" filing, or case filed without
attorney. The Debtor is an affiliate of Kimbob, Inc., which sought
bankruptcy protection on March 1, 2017, Case No. 17-00836.


MARICOPA RESOURCES: Trustee Taps PLS Inc. to Market Assets
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason Searcy, the Chapter 11 trustee for Maricopa Resources, LLC
and its affiliates, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Texas to hire PLS, Inc.

The firm will assist the estate of Maricopa Resources with the sale
of its working interest assets in Grayson County, Texas.

The firm will receive a success fee of $30,000, plus 3.5% of total
transactional value for its services.

PLS and its employees or officers do not hold or represent any
interest adverse to Maricopa Resources' estate, according to court
filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Ronyld Wise
     PLS, Inc.
     Energy Advisors Group
     10850 Richmond Ave., Suite 300
     Houston, TX 77042
     Tel: 713-650-1212
     Fax: 713-658-1922

                     About Maricopa Resources,
               Payson Operating and Payson Petroleum

Maricopa Resources, LLC, Payson Operating, LLC, and Payson
Petroleum, LLC, each filed a Chapter 7 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex.
Case Nos. 16-41043 to 16-41045) on June 10, 2016.  The Debtors were
represented by Mark A.  Weisbart, Esq., at The Law Office of Mark
A. Weisbart.

Michelle Chow was named Chapter 7 trustee but her appointment was
terminated after the cases were converted to Chapter 11 cases on
July 12, 2016.  Jason R. Searcy was appointed as Chapter 11 trustee
for the Debtors.

On August 11, 2016, the court ordered the administrative
consolidation of the cases.  The cases are assigned to Judge Brenda
T. Rhoades.  

The Chapter 11 trustee is represented by Searcy & Searcy, P.C.  The
trustee hired Gollob Morgan Peddy & Co., P.C. as his accountant;
and Traton Engineering Associates, L.P. to oversee the operation
and maintenance of the Debtors' oil and gas properties.


MAYFAIR-HAWAII: Wesley Housing Buying DC Property for $75K
----------------------------------------------------------
Mayfair-Hawaii, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Columbia to authorize the sale of real property located
at 1 Hawaii Avenue N.E., Washington, D.C., as improved by a
34-unit, multi-family, residential apartment project known as 1
Hawaii Avenue N.E. Apartments, to Wesley Housing Development Corp.
of Northern Virginia for $75,000 plus the amount that Wesley and
Fannie Mae agree upon for Wesley's assumption or satisfaction of
the amount due Fannie Mae under the Notes.

The Apartments are currently managed by Paula Forshee, a receiver
appointed prior to the Petition Date at Fannie Mae's request by the
Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Case No. 2017 C.A.
3403.  Pursuant to an agreed order, entered Sept. 26, 2017, the
Receiver is continuing to control and manage the Apartments
notwithstanding the turnover provisions of sections 543(a) and (b)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

Fannie Mae holds two promissory notes from the Debtor which are
secured by first and second priority deeds of trust encumbering the
Property.  It has filed a proof of claim in the case asserting that
as of the Petition Date, the Debtor owed Fannie Mae $3,824,040
under the Notes.

Prior to the Petition Date, Fannie Mae (i) declared the Notes in
default, (ii) accelerated all amounts due thereunder, (iii) filed
suit against the Debtor under the Notes, (iv) scheduled a
foreclosure sale of the Property, and (v) obtained appointment of
the Receiver to take control of the Apartments.

On Dec. 15, 2017, Fannie Mae filed the Lift-Stay Motion for relief
from the automatic stay of section 362(a) and for appointment of a
chapter 11 trustee.  Should the Court grants the Lift-Stay Motion,
Fannie Mae will be free to reschedule a foreclosure sale of the
Property.

The District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory
Affairs recorded a lien in the amount of $12,900 against the
Property on Dec. 2, 2016 for alleged housing code infractions.

The Debtor's amended schedules of assets and liabilities reflect
that as of the Petition Date, there were unsecured priority claims
against its estate of approximately $12,919, and unsecured
non-priority claims, held by non-insiders, against its estate of
approximately $16,140, for aggregate non-insider, unsecured claims
of approximately $19,059.

Since acquiring the Property, the Debtor has used its revenues to
pay for services to its residents and to maintain and improve the
Property's physical condition and systems.  Nonetheless, the
Property has not generated sufficient cash flow to permit the
Debtor to satisfy all of its loan and operating expenses and other
obligations as they have come due.

Given its limited prepetition financial success and Fannie Mae's
efforts to control and force a foreclosure sale of the Property,
prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor determined that it was in
its best interest, and that of its creditors and the tenants of the
Apartments, to sell the Property to an independent third party at a
price that would allow it to satisfy the Notes and its other
financial obligations.

As a result of the Debtor's prepetition marketing efforts the
Debtor and Wesley entered into a Purchase Agreement, dated as of
Sept. 8, 2017, for the sale of the Property to Wesley.  The
Purchase Agreement specifies that the purchase price for the
Property will be $75,000 plus the amount that Wesley and Fannie Mae
agree upon for Wesley's assumption or satisfaction of the amount
due Fannie Mae under the Notes.  The Sale will be free and clear of
all liens and interests.

Notwithstanding the written terms of the Purchase Agreement, (a)
the Debtor and Wesley have agreed that, should Wesley be unable to
reach agreement with Fannie Mae on assumption or satisfaction of
the Notes, then Wesley and the Debtor will agree on the amount
Wesley will pay toward satisfaction of the Notes ("Wesley
Contribution"); (b) Sanford Capital, LLC (a holder of a membership
interest in the Debtor) will remit to the Debtor at closing on the
Sale, in partial satisfaction of the Debtor's claim against
Sanford, an amount sufficient to satisfy (i) the deficiency between
the amount due under the Notes and the Wesley Contribution, (ii)
the amount of all other claims secured by liens against the
Property ("Secured Claims"), (iii) the Debtor's share of closing
and conveyance costs on the Sale, (iv) all administrative expenses
of the estate; and (v) all Non-Insider Claims ("Sanford
Contribution"); and (c) the parties intend to close on the sale
within 30 days of entry of the Court's order approving the Sale.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Mayfair-Hawaii_LLC_74_Sales.pdf

The Debtor is unaware of any other voluntary liens against the
Property or any interests relating to the Property which are not
subject to one or more provisions of section 363(f).  The Debtor
intends to pay any and all unpaid real estate taxes and charges for
utilities relating to the Property from the proceeds of sale at
closing.

The Debtor asks that the Court authorizes it to assume and assign
the Leases to Wesley as part of the Sale.  It further asks that the
Court fixes the Cure Amount as to each of the Leases as $0.  In the
alternative, if the Court determines that it is impractical to rule
on any claims relating to the Leases without unreasonably delaying
the Sale, then the Debtor asks authority to consummate the Sale but
with any claims based upon a Lease attaching to the net sale
proceeds.  

In the further alternative, if the Court determines that the Debtor
cannot assume and assign the Leases without making immediate Cure
Payments to tenants under the Leases, then the Debtor asks
authority to (i) reject the Leases under sections 365(a) and (h),
and (ii) sell the Property subject to the tenants' possessory and
other rights under the Leases.  The Debtor reserves any all rights,
claims, and defenses with respect to the characterization of the
Leases under section 365, applicable non-bankruptcy law or
otherwise.

The Sale will permit the Debtor to pay all Secured Claims,
administrative expenses, and Non-Insider Claims.  It will also
transfer the risk of loss as to the Property to Wesley and will
relieve the Debtor of future management responsibilities, so that
the Debtor's sole, post-Sale focus will be the determination and
payment of administrative expenses and unsecured creditor claims.

Fannie Mae asserts in its Lift-Stay Motion that the appraised value
of the Property is approximately $3,400,000.  If the Fannie Mae
appraisal is correct, then a Fannie Mae foreclosure sale will leave
Fannie Mae with a large deficiency claim and will leave the Debtor
at risk of being unable to pay administrative expenses or make any
distribution to unsecured creditors.

Waiver of the foregoing stays will allow the Debtor to assume and
assign (or reject) the Leases in a timely and efficient manner,
minimize its post-petition administrative liabilities, and allow
Wesley to assume management of the Property as soon as possible.
Accordingly, the Debtor submits that sufficient cause exists to
justify a waiver of the 14-day stays under Rule 6004(h) (if
applicable) and Rule 6006(d).

The Purchaser:

          WESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
          CORP. OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA
          5515 Cherokee Ave., Suite 200
          Alexandria, VA 22312
          Telephone: (703) 642-3830

The Creditors:

          FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
          3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW
          Washington, DC 20016

          DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER &
          REGULATORY AFFAIRS
          1100 4th Street, SW
          Washington, DC 20024

                      About Mayfair-Hawaii

Mayfair-Hawaii LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, owns a
34-unit multifamily property on the south side of Hawaii Avenue,
SE, in the District of Columbia.  Until the appointment of the
receiver, Paula Forshee, the property was managed by Oakmont
Management Group LLC.  Sanford Capital LLC owns 70% of
Mayfair-Hawaii.  A. Carter Nowell is the Debtor's manager.  Oakmont
is owned by Mr. Nowell.

On June 12, 2017, the Superior Court entered a consent order
appointing receiver and granting injunctive relief.  The Receiver,
though Catalyst Property Solutions, has managed the Property since
approximately June 12, 2017.

Mayfair-Hawaii filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D.D.C. Case No. 17-00514) on Sept. 26, 2017, estimating assets and
debt of $1 million to $10 million.  A. Carter Nowell signed the
petition.  

Judge S. Martin Tell J.r. is the case judge.

Kristen E. Burgers, Esq., and Stephen E. Leach, Esq., at Hirschler
Fleischer, PC, in Tysons, Virginia, serve as counsel to the Debtor.


MOHDSAMEER ALJANEDI: Ombudsman Files First Interim Report
---------------------------------------------------------
Constance Doyle, the duly appointed Patient Care Ombudsman for
Mohdsameeer Aljandi Dental Corporation, d/b/a Beachside Dental
Group, files with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California a first interim report.

The PCO finds no health information privacy violations under the
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) -- the
patient records are complete and securely maintained
electronically. Each record shows the signature of the patient who
has received Privacy Policy Information, Patient's Rights
Information, as well as a Dental Fact sheet, explaining the use,
reasons and effects of such things as porcelain, gold, etc.

The PCO reports that there are no surveys conducted except by the
Debtor's insurance providers, however, there are no available
results showing the last survey that was conducted 3-4 weeks before
the PCO's visit.

Accordingly, the PCO makes following recommendations to the
Debtor:

     (a) Maintain all survey/audit materials for review.

     (b) Assure all patient records show signature or receipt of
Patient's Rights, etc.

     (c) Have all maintenance logs ready for review.

The PCO concludes that all care provided to the patients by
Beachside Dental Group is within the standard of care.

A full-text copy of the PCO's First Interim Report is available
at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-14089-49.pdf

The Patient Care Ombudsman can be reached at:

           Constance Doyle, LLC
           21509 Anza Avenue
           Torrance, California 90503
           Phone: (310) 357-1088
           Fax: (213) 402-3824
           Email: mscnooo@hotmail.com

                 About Mohdsameer Aljanedi Dental

Beachside Dental Group is a multi-specialty dental company offering
a wide range of dental services, including general and cosmetic
dentistry, dental sedation, periodontics' gum specialist,
orthodontics, endodontics, oral surgery, pedodontics,
prosthodontics, and laser dentistry.  The Company's gross revenue
amounted to $1.65 million in 2016 and $1.50 million during the year
prior that.  

Mohdsameer Aljanedi Dental Corporation, d/b/a Beachside Dental
Group, previously sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 13-30138) on Aug. 9, 2013.

Mohdsameer Aljanedi Dental again filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-14089) on Oct. 15, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Mohdsameer Aljanedi, president.  At the time
of filing, the Debtor disclosed $1.50 million in total assets and
$3.78 million in liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Mark
S. Wallace.  The Debtor is represented by Michael R. Totaro, Esq.,
at Totaro & Shanahan.

On October 20, 2017, the Court approved the appointment of
Constance R Doyle as Patient Care Ombudsman for Mohdsameeer Aljandi
Dental Corporation, d/b/a Beachside Dental Group.


OPES HEALTH: Seeks to Hire A+ Accounting and Tax
------------------------------------------------
OPES Health Channelside, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida to hire A+
Accounting and Tax as its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in preparing court-ordered reports,
including monthly operating reports and corporate periodic reports,
and any document necessary for the Debtor's disclosure statement.

Akshay Dave, the accountant who will be providing the services,
will charge $175 per hour.  The hourly fees for the accounting
staff range from $50 to $100.

A+ Accounting does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor
or its estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Akshay Dave
     A+ Accounting and Tax
     P.O. Box 372
     Brandon, FL 33509-0372
     Tel: (813) 381-3809
     Email: tax4002@gmail.com

                 About OPES Health Channelside

OPES Health Channelside, LLC, based in Tampa, Florida, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08224) on Sept.
27, 2017.  The Debtor estimated less than $50,000 in assets and $1
million to $10 million in liabilities.  The petition was signed by
Victor D. Cruz, as manager of Multi-Specialty Enterprises, LLC,
manager of the Debtor.  Buddy D. Ford, Esq., and Jonathan A.
Semach, Esq., at Buddy D. Ford, P.A., serve as bankruptcy counsel
to the Debtor.


PALADIN ENERGY: Files Chapter 11 Amended Liquidation Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
Paladin Energy Corp. filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas a disclosure statement in support of its
amended plan of liquidation dated Dec. 12, 2017.

The Plan contemplates the liquidation of the Debtor. Under the
Plan, the Debtor, as reorganized, is referred to as the Liquidating
Debtor. The Liquidating Debtor is responsible for making payments
to Creditors under the Plan. Under the Plan, the Liquidating Debtor
distributes the Wind-Down Funding ($169,000) to various Creditors,
and otherwise winds down its business and existence, ultimately
terminating its existence. Other than the Wind-Down Funding, the
Debtor has no assets or funds remaining to pay any creditors other
than the Senior Lender, and whatever minor assets the Debtor has
represent the collateral of the Senior Lender. In effect, the
Senior Lender has agreed to carve out of its collateral the
Wind-Down Funding, as a result of the Global Settlement, to be used
to pay other Creditors under the Plan. Without that agreement and
carveout, the Debtor has no assets to distribute to any Creditor
other than the Senior Lender.

The Plan also includes the sale of Clearwater SWD, LLC, free and
clear of all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances, to FPH
Ventures, Inc., a Texas corporation owned by George G. Fenton,
David J. Plaisance, and Michael T. Horn, all insiders of the
Debtor, for and in exchange of $20,000 indefeasibly paid by the
Clearwater Buyer to the Senior Lender. This price represents the
fair market value of Clearwater, as has been agreed to by the
Senior Lender. Because the Senior Lender has a lien against
Clearwater, it would receive every dollar paid for the sale, and it
has more than a $10 million deficiency claim remaining. Thus, even
if the Clearwater Sale was for two, three, ten, or even 100 or 500
hundred times this amount, no other Creditor would be paid a dollar
more.

Class 4 Unsecured Claims, to the extent Allowed, are paid pro rata
from the Wind-Down Funding remaining, if any, after payment of
Allowed Administrative Claims, Allowed Secured Tax Claims, and
Allowed Priority Claims. This will be a one-time payment, made no
later than 10 days after all Administrative Claims, Priority
Claims, and Secured Tax Claims are paid and once Unsecured Claims
are Allowed or disallowed, as the case may be.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb16-31590-11-292.pdf

                      About Paladin Energy

Paladin Energy Corp. sought chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 16-31590) on Apr. 21, 2016.  The Debtor is represented by
Davor Rukavina, Esq., at Munsch, Hardt, Kopf & Harr, P.C., in
Dallas, Texas.   The Debtor estimated assets ranging from $10
million to $50 million and estimated debts ranging from $10 million
to $50 million.


PALLET PLUS: Court Approves Disclosure Statement
------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Tennessee is
set to hold a pretrial conference on Jan. 4, 2018, to consider
approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Pallet Plus,
Incorporated.

The hearing will be held at 9:30 a.m., at Courtroom 680.

The court on Dec. 1 approved the company's disclosure statement
after finding that it contains "adequate information."

The restructuring plan filed on Oct. 16 proposes to pay general
unsecured creditors a dividend of 20% or $20,425.07 over five years
following the effective date of the plan.  These creditors assert
$102,125.38 in claims.

                About Pallet Plus, Incorporated

Pallet Plus, Incorporated, sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-24658) on May
25, 2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated less
than $100,000 in assets and $1 million in liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge George W. Emerson Jr.  John Edward
Dunlap, Esq., is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.   

On Oct. 16, 2017, the Debtor filed its proposed Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.


PANADERIA Y REPOSTERIA: Plan Hearing Set for Jan. 25
----------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico is set to
hold a hearing on Jan. 25, 2018, to consider approval of the
Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Panaderia Y Reposteria
Pontevedra Inc.

The hearing will be held at 9:30 a.m., at the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court, Southwestern Divisional Office, MCS Building, Second Floor.

The court had earlier approved the company's disclosure statement,
allowing it to start soliciting votes from creditors.  

The order, signed by Judge Edward Godoy on Dec. 7, required
creditors to file their objections and cast their votes accepting
or rejecting the plan on or before 14 days prior to the Jan. 25
hearing.

                    About Panaderia Y Reposteria

Panaderia Y Reposteria Pontevedra Inc. sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.P.R. Case No. 17-01280)
on February 27, 2017.  The petition was signed by Carlos R.
Rodriguez Torres, president.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$500,000 and liabilities of less than $1 million.

The Debtor hired Modesto Bigas Law Office as counsel.

On October 19, 2017, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement, which
explains its proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.


PEABODY ENERGY: Joplin Parties Bid to File Proofs of Claims Junked
------------------------------------------------------------------
On Dec. 5, 2017, a hearing was held on the motions to file proofs
of claims after the deadline filed by Shanen Givone, Kayla White,
Rose Ann McClary, Matthew Raymond Derrick, Ashley Stanley, Debbie
Dry, Kathleen Lacey, Kimberly Garcia, Tyler Mills, Karen Riley,
Leisha R. Holden, the late Peggy Anne Rentfro, Floyd Woolever,
Patsy S. Barbee, Steven M. Barbee, and Max Humphrey (Joplin
Parties).  In connection with the motions to file proofs of claims
after the deadline, many of the Joplin Parties also filed pleadings
to be treated as motions to allow the proofs of claims, as well as
other related motions and support documents. Peabody Energy
Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries as reorganized Debtors
objected to the Motions and the Liquidating Trustee for the Gold
Fields Liquidating Trust supported the Reorganized Debtors'
objection.

The Joplin Parties seek to file proofs of claim over a year after
the Deadline based on health issues that they allege were caused by
environmental contamination caused by the historic activities of
Gold Fields Mining, LLC and Blue Tee Corporation in the Tri-State
Mining District.

Upon analysis, Judge Barry S. Schermer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri denied the Motions.

On April 13, 2016, Peabody Energy Corp. and certain of its
subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code. Relevant facts concerning the relationships
between PEC, Gold Fields (a Debtor in the bankruptcy proceedings)
and Blue Tee (not a Debtor in the bankruptcy proceedings) were
provided by the Reorganized Debtors in their objection to the
Motions and have not been disputed by the Joplin Parties.

Each of the Joplin Parties now lives or had lived in the Tri-State
Mining District. Although Blue Tee and Gold Fields conducted mining
activity in the Tri-State Mining District in the past, the
Reorganized Debtors never conducted mining operations in that area.
None of the Reorganized Debtors are or have ever been affiliated
with Blue Tee, which is a separate entity.

The Tri-State Mining District, an area encompassing more than 2,500
square miles in southwestern Missouri, southeastern Kansas and
northeastern Oklahoma, was one of the foremost lead-zinc mining
areas of the world and provided nearly continuous production from
about 1850 until 1970. It is undisputed that several sites within
the Tri-State Mining District are on the National Priorities List
due to environmental issues related to historic lead and zinc
mining and related activities.

The Joplin Parties contend that they should be allowed to file
their proofs of claims after the Deadline because they were known
creditors who did not receive actual notice of the Deadline. The
Court disagrees.

The Joplin Parties were not known creditors. It is undisputed that
the Debtors did not know the identification of each of the Joplin
Parties or of any actual alleged injury to them until several
months post-confirmation. The Joplin Parties did not claim that
prior to Ms. Givone's contact with the court in August 2017, they
contacted the Debtors, Reorganized Debtors or Gold Field Debtors
stating that they believed they had a claim. The Debtors' books and
records did not include a record of claims held by the Joplin
Parties, and the Joplin Parties were not included on the Debtors'
bankruptcy schedules.

Since they received constructive notice of the Deadline by
publication, the Joplin Parties may only pursue their claims if
they can demonstrate excusable neglect. To determine whether
neglect is excusable, a court must consider all relevant
circumstances surrounding the party's omission. The factors a court
must consider include: (1) "the danger of prejudice to the debtor;"
(2) "the length of the delay and its potential impact on judicial
proceedings;" (3) "the reason for the delay, including whether it
was within the reasonable control of the movant;" and (4) "whether
the movant acted in good faith."

The Court does not doubt the good faith of the Joplin Parties.
Nevertheless, the Court finds that their neglect in filing their
claims was not excusable because the balance of the factors weigh
against such a finding.

Although a ruling allowing the Joplin Parties to file their claims
late would not address the merits of the claims, the administrative
burden on the Reorganized Debtors and the Gold Fields Liquidating
Trust would be immense. Allowing the Joplin parties' claims to be
filed late would also risk encouraging the filing of claims by
other similarly situated parties, which would further significantly
increase such burden.

The Joplin Parties also contend that they should be permitted to
file their claims late because of their lack of knowledge. As a
preliminary matter, the Joplin Parties are deemed to have known
about the Peabody bankruptcy cases well before they filed documents
in this Court. The Deadline Notice and all of the other notices
published in the bankruptcy cases, of which they are deemed to have
knowledge of by virtue of the constructive notice given by
publication, would have provided notice of the bankruptcy. In
addition, the Peabody bankruptcies were widely publicized
nationally.

A full-text copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion dated Dec. 20,
2017 is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/moeb16-42529-3641.pdf

                About Peabody Energy Corporation

Headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, Peabody Energy Corporation --
http://www.PeabodyEnergy.com/-- claims to be the world's largest
private-sector coal company. As of Dec. 31, 2014, the Company owned
interests in 26 active coal mining operations located in the U.S.
and Australia.  The Company has a majority interest in 25 of those
mining operations and a 50% equity interest in the Middlemount Mine
in Australia.  In addition to its mining operations, the Company
markets and brokers coal from other coal producers, both as
principal and agent, and trade coal and freight-related contracts
through trading and business offices in Australia, China, Germany,
India, Indonesia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the U.S.

At Dec. 31, 2015, the Company had total assets of $11.02 billion
against $10.1 billion in total liabilities, and stockholders'
equity of $919 million.

On April 13, 2016, Peabody Energy Corp. and 153 affiliates filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code. The 154 cases are jointly administered
before the Honorable Judge Barry S. Schermer under (Bankr. E.D. Mo.
Case No. 16-42529).

As of the Petition Date, PEC has approximately $4.3 billion in
outstanding secured debt obligations and $4.5 billion in
outstanding unsecured debt obligations.

The Debtors tapped Jones Day as general counsel; Armstrong,
Teasdale LLP as local counsel; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC and
investment banker Lazard PTY Limited as investment banker; FTI
Consulting, Inc., as financial advisors; and Kurtzman Carson
Consultants, LLC, as claims, ballot and noticing agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 29, 2016, appointed seven
creditors of Peabody Energy Corp. to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors. The Committee retained Morrison &
Foerster LLP as counsel, Spencer Fane LLP as local counsel, Curtis,
Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as conflicts counsel, Blackacre
LLC as its independent expert, and Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as
financial advisor.

On March 17, 2017, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Missouri, Eastern Division, entered an order confirming
the Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Peabody Energy
Corporation, et al., as Revised March 15, 2017.  At 4:01 p.m.
(Eastern Time), on April 3, 2017, the Effective Date of the Plan
occurred.


PLEDGE PETROLEUM: Halt in Operations Raise Going Concern Doubt
--------------------------------------------------------------
Pledge Petroleum Corp. filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $116,651 on $25,000 of net revenue for the
three months ended June 30, 2017, compared with a net loss of
$960,511 on $nil of net revenue for the same period in 2016.

At June 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $8.94 million,
total liabilities of $1.12 million, and a $7.81 million in total
stockholders' equity.

The Company has incurred recurring operating losses and had a net
loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended
December 31, 2016.  The Company has also suspended its business
operations.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/CwlM2M

                   About Pledge Petroleum Corp.

Pledge Petroleum Corp., formerly Propell Technologies Group, Inc.,
is an oil exploration and production (E&P) acquisition company.
The Company focuses on building a base of producing assets by using
technology, including Plasma Pulse well treatment, which uses no
acidization, hydrofracking or other chemicals.  Through its
subsidiaries, Novas Energy USA, Inc. and Novas Energy North
America, LLC (NENA), the Company intends to manage oil production
using the Plasma Pulse Technology.


PROVISION HOLDING: Maturing Debt Raises Going Concern Doubt
-----------------------------------------------------------
Provision Holding, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $2,002,454 on $15,750 of total revenues
for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with a net
loss of $1,623,527 on $58,712 of total revenues for the same period
in 2016.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $2.63
million, total liabilities of $16.60 million, and a $13.97 million
in total stockholders' deficit.

The Company had accumulated deficit at September 30, 2017 of
$44,085,844.  The Company has negative working capital of
$14,151,326 as of September 30, 2017.  Additionally, the Company
has approximately $8,879,685 convertible debt and promissory notes
currently due.  These matters raise substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company's
continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to
generate sufficient cash flow to meet its obligations on a timely
basis, to obtain additional financing or refinancing as may be
required and, ultimately, to attain profitable operations.
Management's plan to eliminate the going concern situation include,
but are not limited to, the raise of additional capital through
issuance of debt and equity, improved cash flow management,
aggressive cost reductions, and the creation of additional sales
and profits across its product lines.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/zVYRU0

                     About Provision Holding

Provision Holding, Inc., together with Provision Interactive
Technologies, Inc., is a purveyor of intelligent interactive 3D
holographic display technologies, software, and integrated
solutions for both commercial and consumer focused applications.
Chatsworth, California-based Provision's 3D pholographic display
systems project full color, high resolution videos into space
detached from the screen without any special glasses.



RENTECH INC: Selling WP Subsidiaries' Assets for $61 Million
------------------------------------------------------------
Rentech, Inc., and Rentech WP U.S. Inc. ask the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware to authorize them to sell:

   (i) all or substantially all assets New England Wood Pellet, LLC
("NEWP"), a wholly-owned non-debtor subsidiary of Rentech WP, and
the assets of NEWP's subsidiaries Schuyler Wood Pellet, LLC, and
Deposit Wood Pellet, LLC to Lignetics of New England, Inc., for $33
million; and

  (ii) all or substantially all of the assets of Fulghum Fibres,
Inc., a wholly-owned non-debtor subsidiary of Rentech WP U.S. Inc.,
and the assets of Fulghum's subsidiaries Fulghum Fibres Florida,
Inc. and Fulghum Fibres Collins, Inc. to FFI Acquisition, Inc. for
$28 million.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Jan. 17, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
(ET).  The objection deadline is Jan. 10, 2018 at 4:00 p.m. (ET).

During 2015 and 2016, Rentech began to experience revenue, cash
flow, and liquidity challenges due in large part to construction
and operating issues with the Canadian wood pellet facilities,
reduced sales for the wood pellet businesses located in the
Northeastern United States operated through NEWP, and reduced
demand for the wood chipping services provided by Fulghum US in the
Southeastern United States.  The increasing strain on Rentech's
liquidity threatened its ability to continue to service its debts.

On April 19, 2016, Rentech engaged Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, to
assist in the process of reviewing strategic alternatives to
address its liquidity needs.  On Jan. 30, 2017, it also retained
RPA Advisors, LLC, to, among other things, validate its business
plans and financial forecasts, develop restructuring proposals, and
conduct discussions with creditors and stakeholders.

After full consideration of Rentech's potential strategic and
financial alternatives and discussions with many potential
investors, it became clear that there were no viable out-of-court
refinancing or restructuring options for the Debtors to pursue.
Faced with a lack of viable financing options and dwindling
liquidity, and after extensive discussions with its Advisors,
Rentech determined that (i) the sale of substantially all of the
assets of (a) the Fulghum Sellers, (b) the NEWP Sellers, and (c)
RTK WP2 Canada, ULC, and (ii) the liquidation of RTK WP Canada,
ULC's wood pellet production facility in Wawa, Ontario pursuant to
a receivership, combined with the Debtors' bankruptcy filing in the
United States and the filing of a liquidating plan, was in the best
interests of the Debtors and their creditor.

The Debtors filed Chapter 11 cases to address near-term liquidity
and operational challenges brought on in part by the failure of
Rentech's Wawa, Facility to operate as expected coupled with
Rentech's guarantee of the obligations arising under some of the
larger contracts needed for the Wawa Facility operations.  The
total contingent obligations for Rentech related to these
guarantees is in the tens of millions of dollars.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Advisors conducted an extensive
marketing process in an effort to locate a potential buyer for
Rentech or certain of the Non-Debtor Subsidiaries.  In all, the
Debtors' and the Sellers' marketing process encompassed
approximately 15 months of preliminary diligence, negotiation and
analysis.

On Dec. 15, 2017, the Fulghum Sellers entered into the Fulghum APA
pursuant to which the Fulghum Buyer will purchase substantially all
of Fulghum US' assets (aside from certain specified excluded
assets) and assume substantially all of its liabilities (aside from
certain specified excluded liabilities).  The base purchase price
under the Fulghum APA is $28 million, free and clear of all
Encumbrances.

On Dec. 19, 2017, the NEWP Sellers entered into the NEWP APA
pursuant to which the NEWP Buyer will purchase substantially all of
NEWP's assets (aside from certain specified excluded assets) and
assume substantially all of its liabilities (aside from certain
specified excluded liabilities).  The base purchase price under the
NEWP APA is $33 million, free and clear of all Liens.
Collectively, the assets being sold in the NEWP APA and in the
Fulghum APA likely constitute substantially all of the Debtors'
assets.

A copy of the APAs attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/Rentech_WP_54_Sales.pdf

Although there are no guarantees, the Debtors reasonably expect
that the net proceeds of the Sales will pay all secured and
priority creditors of the Debtors in full and provide value to
their general unsecured creditors.

As set forth throughout the Motion, the Debtors aver that any delay
in their ability to enter into and consummate the Sales would
jeopardize the Sales and be detrimental to them, their estates,
creditors, stakeholders, and other parties-in-interest.  For this
reason and those set forth, the Debtors submit that ample cause
exists to justify a waiver of the 14-day stay imposed by Bankruptcy
Rule 6004(h), to the extent applicable in the Order.

FFI Acquisition can be reached at:

          FFI ACQUISITION, INC.
          #1 Industrial Road
          Brent, AL 35034
          Telephone: 205-926-4439
          Facsimile: 205-926-4469
          Attn: President

FFI Acquisition is represented by:

          John H. Cooper, Esq.
          SIROTE & PERMUTT, P.C.
          2311 Highland Avenue South
          Birmingham, Alabama 35205
          Telephone: 205-930-5108
          Facsimile: 205-212-3823

                 - and -

          William J. Bryant, Esq.
          DOMINICK FELD HYDE, P.C.
          1130 22nd Street South, Suite 4000
          Birmingham, Alabama 35205
          Telephone: 205-536-8888
          Facsimile: 205-271-9696

          LIGNETICS OF NEW ENGLAND, INC.
          c/o Lignetics, Inc.
          1075 E. South Boulder Rd #210
          Louisville, CO 80027
          Attn: Brett Jordan, President
          E-mail: brettj@lignetics.com

Lignetics is represented by:

          N. Todd Leishman, Esq.
          DURHAM JONES & PINEGAR, PC
          111 South Main Street, Suite 2400
          Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
          E-mail: tleishman@djplaw.com

                      About Rentech, Inc.

Rentech, Inc., has 37 direct and indirect non-debtor subsidiaries
in addition to Rentech WP U.S. Inc., which is a wholly owned direct
subsidiary of Rentech.  Rentech is a wood fibre processing company
with three core businesses: (i) contract wood handling and chipping
services; (ii) the manufacture and sale of wood pellets for the
U.S. heating market; and (iii) the manufacture, aggregation, and
sale of wood pellets for the utility and industrial power
generation market.

Rentech is effectively comprised of the following segments: (1)
NEWP and its non-debtor subsidiaries; (2) Fulghum and its U.S.
non-debtor subsidiaries; (3) the South American non-debtor
subsidiaries of Fulghum; (4) Rentech, Inc.'s direct and indirect
Canadian non-debtor subsidiaries; and (5) Rentech, Inc., Rentech
WP, and all other direct and indirect U.S. non-debtor subsidiaries
of Rentech, Inc.

Rentech, Inc. and Rentech WP U.S. Inc. sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12958) on Dec. 19, 2017.  The
Chapter 11 cases are being jointly administered for procedural
purposes only pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 1015(b).

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, and Latham
& Watkins LLP as counsel; RPA Advisors, LLC, as financial advisor;
and Prime Clerk LLC, as claims and noticing agent.



RINGWOOD PROPERTIES: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on Jan. 9
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey will
consider approval of the proposed small business plan for Ringwood
Properties, LLC at a hearing on Jan. 9, 2018.

The hearing will be held at Courtroom 3A, at 2:30 p.m.

The court will also consider at the hearing final approval of the
company's disclosure statement, which it conditionally approved on
Dec. 6.

The order set a Jan. 2, 2018 deadline for creditors to file their
objections and cast their votes accepting or rejecting the plan.

                    About Ringwood Properties

Ringwood Properties, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 16-31767) on November 14,
2016.  The petition was signed by Bruce Perry, member.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities of less than $500,000.

On November 15, 2017, the Debtor filed its proposed small business
plan and disclosure statement.


ROYAL COACHMAN: Plan Outline Okayed, Plan Hearing on March 8
------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington is
set to hold a hearing on March 8, at 10:00 a.m., to consider
approval of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization for Royal
Coachman Mobile Home Park, LLC.

The court on Dec. 7 approved the company's disclosure statement,
which describes the proposed plan, after finding that it contains
"adequate information."  

                     About Royal Coachman

Royal Coachman Mobile Home Park, LLC, sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Wash. Case No.
16-03109) on Oct. 3, 2016.  The petition was signed by Shannon
Hunter Burns, authorized representative.  

The Debtor is represented by Dan O'Rourke, Esq., at Southwell &
O'Rourke, P.S.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $1
million to $10 million and liabilities of less than $500,000.


SANSAL WELLNESS: Recurring Losses Raise Going Concern Doubt
-----------------------------------------------------------
SanSal Wellness Holdings, Inc., filed its quarterly report on Form
10-Q, disclosing a net loss of $413,367 on $255,444 of net sales
for the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared with a net
loss of $457,801 on $nil of net sales for the same period in 2016.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $6.15
million, total liabilities of $2.07 million, and a $4.08 million in
total stockholders' equity.

The Company has sustained substantial losses from operations since
its inception.  As of September 30, 2017, the Company had an
accumulated deficit of $2,572,904 and a working capital deficit of
$125,990.  These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt
about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/IT55Qb

                  About Sansal Wellness Holdings

Sansal Wellness Holdings, Inc., owns and operates a 140-acre farm
in Pueblo, Colorado, capable of producing over 200,000 proprietary
full spectrum phytocannabinoid-rich hemp plants yielding a
potential minimum annual harvest of over 200,000 pounds of
outdoor-grown industrial hemp (less than 0.3% THC).  The Company
also operates approximately 15,000 sq. ft. of climate-controlled
greenhouses to produce a consistent supply of year-round
indoor-cultivated hemp.  In addition, there is a 10,000-sq. ft.
onsite facility used for processing raw industrial hemp, oil
extraction, formulation laboratories, and quality/purity testing.  


SERENITY HOMECARE: Ombudsman Files 1st Report
---------------------------------------------
Henry G. Hobbs, Jr., acting U.S. Trustee for Region 5, submits to
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana the
first report of the Patient Care Ombudsman appointed in the
bankruptcy cases of Serenity Homecare, LLC and its affiliates.

Beginning October 19, 2017, the PCO has interviewed a sample of
clients and/or their caregivers receiving service form Serenity
Home Care (West Monroe, Alexandria, Opelousas and Marksville
Offices), Hospice Care of Avoyelles Parish and Antigua Investments
dba Canterbury House. A small sample of employees from Serenity
Homecare and Canterbury House has also been interviewed.

Serenity Home Health and HCOA clients or their caregivers reported
that all staffs from the agencies were professional, citing staff
calling the home before visiting, showing up on time, being
thorough, and exhibiting an unhurried demeanor.

Initially, there were several clients expressing dissatisfaction
with the services. The PCO notes, however, that during the
follow-up interviews, the PCO finds no reduction in the quality of
services provided since the PCO's initial interview.

In summary, the PCO receives an overwhelming satisfaction and
support from the clients and employees of Serenity Home Care,
Hospice of Avoyelles Parish and Antigua Investments dba Canterbury
House. The PCO finds no reduction of quality during the follow-up
assessments. The PCO plans to continue with follow-up interviews
with clients or caregivers to assess any change in the quality of
services provided by the Debtors.

A full-text copy of the PCO's first report is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb17-80881-171.pdf

The U.S. Trustee is represented by:

            Richard H. Drew, Esq.
            Trial Attorney, Office of U. S. Trustee
            300 Fannin Street, Suite 3196
            Shreveport, LA 71101
            Telephone: (318) 676-3456
            Direct Telephone: (318) 676-3484
            Facsimile: (318) 676-3212

                    About Serenity Homecare

Serenity Homecare, LLC, is a home health care service provider in
Alexandria, Louisiana.  Serenity Homecare and its affiliates sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. La.
Lead Case No. 17-80881) on Aug. 22, 2017. Thomas E. Cupples, II,
its member and manager, signed the petitions.  Judge John W. Kolwe
presides over the cases.

Each of Serenity Homecare, Antigua Investments, Central Louisiana
Home, Cupples Holdings, Hospice Care of Avoyelles, Quality Home
Health I and Quality Home Health estimated under $50,000 in assets.
Serenity Homecare and Cupples Holdings estimated under $1 million
in liabilities.  Antigua Investments estimated $1 million to $10
million in liabilities.  Central Louisiana Home, Hospice Care of
Avoyelles and Quality Home Health I estimated under $500,000 in
liabilities. Quality Home Health estimated under $100,000 in
liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell, in
Alexandria, Louisiana, as counsel.


SILO CITY: Unsecureds to be Paid $13,500 Per Month Over 5 Years
---------------------------------------------------------------
General unsecured creditors of Silo City, Inc., will receive a
monthly payment of not less than $13,500 over five years under the
company's proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

Under the restructuring plan, creditors holding Class 11 general
unsecured claims will receive monthly payments of $13,500 beginning
on the date that is 60 days after the plan takes effect. Each of
these creditors will receive equal monthly payments over five years
with no interest.

Class 11 general unsecured creditors assert $2.5 million in
claims.

The company believes that it will have enough cash on hand on the
effective date to pay claims and will have enough cash over the
life of the plan.  Its financial projections show that it will have
sufficient income to make payments of about $32,000 per month under
the plan, according to the company's disclosure statement filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
California.

A copy of the disclosure statement is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/caeb17-10238-225.pdf

                       About Silo City Inc.

Silo City, Inc., fdba Sun Coast Materials Co., is a California
corporation based in Bakersfield.  It owns real properties
including 3.30 acres and holds a ground lease for an additional
1.24 acres and improvements, with a warehouse, shop and offices,
truck scale, multiple silos, storage yard and rail transfer station
located in Bakersfield.

Silo City, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Calif.
Case No. 17-10238) on January 25, 2017.  The Hon. Rene Lastreto II
presides over the case.  Jacob L. Eaton, at Klein, Denatale,
Goldner, Cooper, Rosenleib & Kimball, LLP, serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Michael
Clift, its president.

A list of the Debtor's 17 largest unsecured creditors is available
for free at http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-10238.pdf


SOLAT LLC: Taps Mike Caldwell as Accountant
-------------------------------------------
SoLat, LLC and LuLat, LLC seek approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of Texas to hire Mike Caldwell as
their accountant.

Mr. Caldwell will, among other things, assist the Debtors in the
preparation of their monthly financials; monthly operating reports;
and federal income tax returns for 2017.

Mr. Caldwell will charge $275 a month for the preparation of the
monthly financials and $300 a month for the MORs.  The fee for
preparing the tax return for each Debtor is $550.

In a court filing, Mr. Caldwell disclosed that he is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Caldwell maintains an office at:

     Mike Caldwell
     17425 Redland Road
     San Antonio, TX 78247
     Phone: 210-403-9300

                       About SoLat, LLC
                        and LuLAT, LLC

SoLat, LLC and its affiliate LuLAT, LLC, filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case Nos. 17-52594 and 17-52595, respectively) on
Nov. 6, 2017.  The petition was signed by Nada L. Ismail, manager.
In its petition, SoLat, LLC estimated at least $50,000 in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.

The Hon. Craig A. Gargotta presides over the case.  Ronald J.
Smeberg, Esq., at the Smeberg Law Firm, PLLC, serves as counsel the
Debtors.

Solat, LLC, d/b/a Chevron, filed as a Domestic Limited Liability
Company in the State of Texas on Jan. 27, 2012, according to public
records filed with Texas Secretary of State. The company's
principal assets are located at 5115 Thousand Oaks San Antonio,
Texas.  SoLAT, LLC was formed with the intent of owning a
commercial real property to be used in housing a Chevron gas
station and convenience store, while LuLAT, LLC was formed with the
intent of operating the Chevron gas station.

The ownership of both companies is made up of A.D. Ismail, Nada
Ismail Taha, and Hakim Taha.  A.D. Ismail owns 2% of each Debtor,
Nada Ismail Taha owns 50% of each Debtor, and Hakim Taha owns 48%
of each Debtor.


SPORTS ZONE: New Legacy Buying 10 Remaining Stores for $900K
------------------------------------------------------------
The Sports Zone, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland to authorize their
bidding procedures and their Asset Purchase Agreement with New
Legacy 900, Inc. in connection with the sale of substantially all
their assets for $900,000, subject to overbid.

Since 1985, the Debtors have operated sneaker and sporting apparel
stores at shopping malls in Maryland, Virginia, and the District of
Columbia.  As recently as September 2017, the Debtor operated 28
stores.  In September 2017, the Debtors closed 16 of their stores,
leaving 11 stores open.  They intend to close one more store in
Georgetown in January 2018, which is operated by a non-debtor
affiliate.

The Debtors' financial struggles date back to the nationwide
recession in 2008.  During the recession, their sales slumped, and
the Debtors were unable to refinance their approximately $4 million
balloon note with PNC Bank, N.A.  In order to pay down the balloon
note in 2010, The Sports Zone borrowed, in a series of loans, $1.8
million from its principal, Michael Syag, and paid the remaining
amounts due to PNC over the next 18 months.  The loans from Michael
Syag remain outstanding.

To service the debt payments to PNC, the Debtors attempted to
increase their cash flow by expanding their footprint.
Unfortunately, the expansion was unsuccessful.  The expansion left
them unable to service debts to various landlords.  The payments to
PNC also caused the Debtors to fall behind on payments to their
vendors, including their most important vendor, Nike USA, Inc.  In
response, Nike, which accounted for more than half of the Debtors'
sales, stopped selling new product to the Debtors.

In an attempt to resolve The Sports Zone's debts to Nike, on Feb.
17, 2017, The Sports Zone issued a promissory note and executed a
security agreement with Nike in the original principal amount of
$3,700,000.  Thereafter, from March to September 2017, The Sports
Zone made payments of approximately $330,000 per month to Nike.
Such payments depleted The Sports Zone's cash on hand, and caused
it to fall behind on payments to other vendors.  

In an attempt to reduce its operating expenses, the Debtors closed
17 of their stores in September 2017 and terminated the leases
associated therewith.  On Sept. 18, 2017, Nike filed a UCC-1
financing statement with the State Corporation Commission of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, in an attempt to perfect its security
agreement against The Sports Zone.

Prior to filing bankruptcy, The Sports Zone entered into a letter
of intent with Halifax of Palisade, LLC, a New Jersey apparel
wholesaler.  In the letter of intent, Halifax stated its intent to
purchase all of the Debtors' remaining stores (other than the
Georgetown store), and sell similar product lines as the Debtors.
However, Halifax will not need to purchase inventory from Nike.

These cases were filed so that the Debtors can sell their assets or
reorganize their affairs while treating all creditors equally.  To
this end, The Sports Zone has filed an adversary complaint against
Nike in order to avoid any security interest it may have as a
preferential transfer.

The Debtors do not have traditional secured indebtedness with any
institutional lender.  However, in February 2017, The Sports Zone,
Inc. (but not the Subsidiary Debtors) did enter into a promissory
note and security agreement with Nike in which it purported to
pledge assets to Nike.  The amount owed to Nike as of the Petition
is estimated to be $1,864,954.  However, the Debtors believe that
Nike's lien on the said assets is void or voidable because Nike did
not record its financing statement in Virginia until Sept. 8,
2017.

The Debtors have, subject to Court approval, entered into an APA
with the Purchaser, a newly formed affiliate of Halifax.  The APA
calls for the Purchaser to make payments of $900,000 for
substantially all of the Debtors' assets and for the assumption and
assignment of all their remaining leases of real property.  

The Purchase Price consists of the direct payment by the Purchaser
of (i) $250,000 of cure costs directly to counterparties to
Assigned Leases and Executory Contracts at Closing pro rata; plus;
plus (ii) $250,000 to the Debtors' estates at Closing; and plus
(iii) 10 payments of $40,000 commencing on the 25th day of the
first month following the entry of the Sale Order to be divided pro
rata between the Debtors' estates and the remaining cure costs owed
to counterparties to leases and executory contracts that are
assumed and assigned (so that the remaining cure costs are paid in
full, with any remaining money to be paid to the estate).

Neither the management nor Michael Syag, the sole shareholder of
The Sports Zone, has any equity or other investment in the
Purchaser.  The proposed sale does not require the Purchaser to
hire any employees of the Debtors; however, it is believed that the
Purchaser intends to rehire most employees of the Debtors,
including most remaining management.  The maintenance of their
workforce will reduce the risk of administrative and priority
claims by employees.

The Debtors' main assets are their inventory, equipment leases,
brand name and certain vehicles.  They value their inventory and
equipment at approximately $1 million, and their vehicles at
$13,000.  They've not valued their leases or brand name.  The
Debtors are unaware of any fraudulent conveyances recoverable by
their estates, or of any significant potential actions to recover
preferential transfers based on payments made within the 90 days
prior to the bankruptcy.  The Sports Zone made over $1.6 million of
payments to Nike between March and September 2017; however,
recovery of such payments pursuant to section 547 of the Bankruptcy
Code would require proof that Nike was an insider.

The Cure Costs to the Debtors' landlords are estimated to be
$482,000, leaving approximately $412,000 for the estate from the
sale.  The Debtors estimate they will have administrative expenses
totaling $75,000.  There are no known priority claims, or
reclamation claims.  Vehicle liens total approximately $8,000.
Accordingly, the Debtors estimate that $329,000 from the sale
should be available to holders of general unsecured claims.

The Debtors estimate that they will have approximately $7.1 million
in unsecured claims, not including any Section 502(b)(6) claims
from landlords whose leases were terminated prepetition.  With such
claims included, the Debtors may have as much $10 million in
unsecured claims.  Major general unsecured creditors include Nike
(owed approximately $1.8 million), other landlords and trade
creditors (owed approximately $2.8 million) and Michael Syag (owed
approximately $2.5 million).  In the event the sale is approved,
this number will decrease but the amount of the Cure Costs for the
Designated Contracts.

The Debtors believe that the likely alternatives to approval of the
sale are dismissal or conversion to Chapter 7, either alternative
resulting in the liquidation of the Debtors.  They believe that the
liquidation of their assets would not result in any significant
distribution to creditors, would result in the loss of jobs, and
would be a disservice to its customers and landlords.  Also,
requiring them to file a Chapter 11 plan to accomplish a sale to
the Purchaser would only deplete their resources.

To obtain the highest or otherwise best bid for the Acquired
Assets, the Debtors intend to implement the Bidding Procedures.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Jan. 19, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Minimum Bid: The bid has value to the Debtors that is
greater than or equal to (i) the $900,000 consideration provided by
the Purchaser, plus (ii) $25,000 Breakup Fee, plus (iii) $10,000
Initial Overbid

     c. Good Faith Deposit: $50,000

     d. Auction: The Auction will be conducted on Jan. 25, 2018, at
10:00 a.m. (ET) at the offices of McNamee, Hosea, Jernigan, Kim,
Greenan & Lynch, P.A., 6411 Ivy Lane, Suite 200, Greenbelt MD
20770, or such later time or such other place as the Debtors will
designate in a subsequent notice to all Qualified Bidders.

     e. Bid Increments: $10,000

     f. Sale Hearing: Jan. 29, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. (ET)

     g. Assignment and Cure Objection Deadline: No later than 5:00
p.m. (ET) on the date that is 14 days after the filing of the
Cure Notice

     h. The Transaction will be on an "as is, where is" basis and
without representations or warranties of any kind, nature, or
description by the Debtors, their estates, or their agents or
representatives.

A copy of the APA and the Bidding Procedures attached to the Motion
is available for free at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/Sports_Zone_64_Sales.pdf

Accordingly, the Debtors ask that the Acquired Assets be sold and
transferred to the Successful Bidder free and clear of all liens,
claims and encumbrances, including successor liability.  To
facilitate and effectuate the sale of their assets, the Debtors
also ask authority to assume and assign certain Designated
Contracts to the Successful Bidder.

The Debtors submit that Nike should not be allowed to credit bid on
the Acquired Assets.  As Nike asserts a claim approximately twice
the value of the Purchase Price, any ability of Nike to credit bid
would significantly chill bidding.  To the extent that Nike's
security interest is not avoided in its entirety, the Court should
allocate the proceeds of the proposed sale after closing pro rata
between the value of any encumbered and unencumbered assets.

An expeditious closing of a sale is necessary and appropriate to
maximize value for the estates.  Accordingly, the Debtors ask that
the Court waive the 14-day stay period under Bankruptcy Rules
6004(h) and 6006(d).

The Purchaser:

          NEW LEGACY 900, INC.
          c/o Jaeil Shim
          141 Lanza Ave. Unit 18c
          Garfield, NJ 07026

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Jong Wo Park, Esq.
          LAW OFFICE OF JON WONG PARK, LLC
          460 Bergen Blvd., Suite 201
          Palisades Park, NJ 07650
          E-mail: parkjonglaw@gmail.com

                      About The Sports Zone

The Sports Zone, Inc., doing business Sports Zone and Sports Zone
Elite -- https://sportszoneelite.com -- operates retail stores in
Washington, Maryland, and Virginia selling footwear, apparel and
accessories.  Based in Beltsville, Maryland, the company offers
brands like Adidas, New Balance, and The North Face.  The company
is 100% owned by Michael Syag.

Sports Zone, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Md. Case
No. 17-26758) on Dec. 15, 2017.  The Debtor estimated assets of
$500,000 to $1 million and debt of $1 million to $10 million.
Michael Dahan, chief executive officer, signed the petition.

On Dec. 21, 2017, its subsidiaries, The Zone 220, LLC; Sports Zone
of Hechinger, LLC; The Zone 450, LLC; The Zone 600, LLC; The Zone
620, LLC; Zone of DC USA, LLC; The Zone 700, LLC; The Zone 870,
LLC; and The Zone 999, LLC, each filed a voluntary petition for
bankruptcy relief and protection under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code.  Each of the Subsidiary Debtors is 100% of owned by The
Sports Zone.

The Debtors have sought joint administration of the Chapter 11
cases.  Judge Thomas J. Catliota is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Justin Philip Fasano, Esq., and Janet M. Nesse,
Esq., at McNamee Hosea, as counsel.


STRINGER FARMS: Unsecureds Estimated to Recover 33% of Claims
-------------------------------------------------------------
Stringer Farms, Inc. (SFI) and Charles Blake Stringer submitted
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas a
disclosure statement dated December 4, 2017.

If a liquidating trust is not required to be established under the
plan, holders of general unsecured claims will receive, promptly
after the effective date, but in no event later than January 31,
2017, a pro rata share of the sum of $2,000,000.  If the
liquidating trust is required to be established under the plan,
each such holder will receive a pro rata share of the net
liquidating trust assets, if any, after all the administrative
expense, priority claims, and allowed claims have been satisfied in
accordance with the plan.  To the extent that there are sufficient
net liquidating trust assets, each holder shall be entitled to
receive interest on its allowed claim from January 1, 2017 at the
plan rate. General unsecured claims are estimated to amount to
$6,050,000 with an estimated recovery of 33%.

The following secured claims shall have an estimated recovery of
100%:

     - Zions secured claims, estimated to be $10,650,000
     - Wells Fargo secured claims, amounting to $2,125,000
     - WFFLI secured claims, amounting to $941,124.01
     - Caterpillar secured claim, estimated to be $22,000
     - FNMA secured claim, estimated to be $406,000
     - Ally Bank secured claim, estimated to be $41,000
     - Secured property tax claims, estimated to be $63,000

A full-text copy of Stringer Farms' disclosure statement is
available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb16-44821-rfn11-244.pdf

Stringer Farms is represented by:

          Jeff P. Prostok, Esq.
          Matthew G. Maben, Esq.
          FORSHEY & PROSTOK LLP
          777 Main St., Suite 1290
          Ft. Worth, TX 76102
          Tel: (817)877-8855
          Fax: (817)877-4151
          Email: jprostok@forsheyprostok.com
                 mmaben@forsheyprostok.com

                     About Stringer Farms Inc.

Stringer Farms, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex.
Case No. 16-44821), on December 14, 2016.  The petition was signed
by Charles Blake Stringer, president. The case is assigned to Judge
Russell F. Nelms.  At the time of filing, the Debtor had $10
million to $50 million in estimated assets and $1 million to $10
million in estimated liabilities.

Charles Blake Stringer, sole shareholder, filed a voluntary Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 16-44871) on December 20,
2016.  The cases are jointly administered under Case No.
16-44821).

The Debtors are represented by Jeff P. Prostok, Esq., at Forshey &
Prostok, LLP.  The Debtors hired Young & Newsom, PC as special
litigation counsel; Brosier & Buchanan Partners as accountant; and
Lovell, Lovell, Isern & Farabough, LLP as special counsel.

No creditors' committee, trustee or examiner has been appointed in
the Debtors' cases.


SUNEDISON INC: Exits Chapter 11 Restructuring
---------------------------------------------
SunEdison Inc., disclosed that its Plan of Reorganization (the
"Plan") became effective on Dec. 29, 2017, and that the Company has
emerged from Chapter 11 as a newly reorganized, privately held
company.  The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New
York confirmed the Plan on July 28, 2017.

Following over $2.3 billion of gross asset sales throughout its
chapter 11 cases -- including the sale of the Company's most
valuable asset, its interests in non-debtor affiliates TerraForm
Power, Inc. and TerraForm Global, Inc. (together, the "Yieldcos")
-- SunEdison emerges with a significantly smaller footprint and
will continue to focus on monetizing its remaining assets.  

As part of the Plan negotiation process, the Company facilitated
key settlements with its diverse constituent groups.  To that end,
John S. Dubel, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Restructuring Officer, commented that, "We sincerely appreciate the
support and cooperation of our financial stakeholders, advisors,
creditors, and other parties involved in the Company's Chapter 11
process, including our first and second lien lenders, the official
committee of unsecured creditors, and the Yieldcos." Mr. Dubel also
noted that, "We also want to thank the Company's outgoing board of
directors for their invaluable contributions and guidance relating
to the Company's restructuring."

Richard Katz will serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the reorganized SunEdison.

Ankura Consulting provided interim management services for the
Company, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP served as counsel
to the Company, Togut Segal & Segal LLP served as co-counsel to the
Company, Rothschild Inc. served as financial advisor and investment
banker for the Company, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as
financial advisor for the Company, and McKinsey Recovery &
Transformation Services U.S., LLC served as restructuring advisor
for the Company.

SunEdison Common Stock

Pursuant to the Plan, the SunEdison existing common stock has been
cancelled.  Common stockholders will receive no distribution and
will not retain any property under SunEdison's Plan.

                     About SunEdison, Inc.

SunEdison, Inc. (OTC PINK: SUNEQ), is a developer and seller of
photovoltaic energy solutions, an owner and operator of clean power
generation assets, and a global leader in the development,
manufacture and sale of silicon wafers to the semiconductor
industry.

On April 21, 2016, SunEdison, Inc., and 25 of its affiliates each
filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos.
16-10991 to 16-11017).  Martin H. Truong, the senior vice
president, general counsel and secretary, signed the petitions.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $20.7 billion and total debt
of $16.1 billion as of Sept. 30, 2015.

The Debtors have hired Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
counsel, Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as conflicts counsel, Rothschild
Inc. as investment banker and financial advisor, McKinsey Recovery
& Transformation Services U.S., LLC, as restructuring advisors and
Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.  The Debtors employed
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as financial advisors; and KPMG LLP as
their auditor and tax consultant.

SunEdison also tapped Eversheds LLP as its special counsel for
Great Britain and the Middle East.  Cohen & Gresser LLP has also
been retained as special counsel.

The Debtors tapped Ernst & Young LLP to provide tax-related
services.  Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC has been hired as real
estate advisor.  Binswanger of Texas, Inc. also has been retained
as real estate agent.

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP serves as counsel to TerraForm Power, Inc.,
and TerraForm Global, Inc.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as its
general bankruptcy counsel and Morrison & Foerster LLP as special
counsel.  Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Kobre & Kim LLP serve as
conflicts counsel.  Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, serves as
the Committee's financial advisors.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' prepetition
first lien credit agreement are Richard Levy, Esq., and Brad
Kotler, Esq., at Latham & Watkins.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the postpetition DIP
financing facility are Scott Greissman, Esq., and Elizabeth Feld,
Esq., at White & Case LLP.

Counsel to the Tranche B Lenders (as defined in the DIP credit
agreement) and the steering committee of the second lien creditors
are Arik Preis, Esq., and Naomi Moss, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Field, LLP.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' prepetition
second lien credit agreement is Daniel S. Brown, Esq., at Pillsbury
Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

The collateral trustee under the Debtors' prepetition second lien
credit agreement and the indenture trustee under each of the
Debtors' outstanding bond issuances, is represented by Marie C.
Pollio, Esq., at Shipman & Goodwin LLP.

Counsel to the ad hoc group of certain holders of the Debtors'
convertible senior notes is White & Case LLP's Tom Lauria, Esq.

                           *    *    *

On March 28, 2017, the Debtors filed their Plan of Reorganization
and related Disclosure Statement.  The Disclosure Statement was
approved on June 13, 2017.  Judge Stuart Bernstein subsequently
confirmed the Debtors' Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization
on July 28, 2017.


TEXAS PELLETS: Must Tender Additional Payment of $125K to JBI
-------------------------------------------------------------
Bankruptcy Judge Bill Parker grants in part and denies in part J
Riley Enterprises, LLC's motion for allowance and payment of
administrative claim. Objections were filed by Debtors Texas
Pellets, Inc. and German Pellets Texas, LLC, and by NAPCO in the
jointly-administered Chapter 11 case captioned IN RE: TEXAS
PELLETS, INC., Chapter 11, Debtors, Case No. 16-90126 (Bankr. E.D.
Tex.)

After a fire damaged the Debtors' ship-loading mechanism in the
pellet storage facility in Port Arthur, Texas, the Debtors procured
the trucking services of JBI to facilitate the removal of the
pellets. Such trucking services were to be tendered on a 24/7 basis
until the removal process was completed. After two days of severely
limited truck usage due to the Debtors' continued struggle to
provide pellets available to be transported, the contract was
altered at the truckers' insistence to a payment basis of $160 per
hour. That limitation occurred with varying frequency throughout
the eight days in which JBI provided trucking services to the
Debtors under the contract. In that period, JBI and its
subcontractors transported 668 loads of undamaged pellets to
Woodville and six loads of damaged pellets to Deweyville.

JBI subsequently submitted a series of revised invoices for
services rendered totaling $767,007.38. Within 30 days of the
completion of services, the Debtors made a partial payment of
$303,000 to JBI. The Debtors admitted during the hearing that, of
the remaining $464,007.38 requested by JBI in its final invoice,
$161,287.38 is uncontested by the Debtors and is due and owing.
However, controversy among the parties remains as to the additional
compensation of $302,720 requested by JBI. The disputed amount
represents 1,892 hours of "stand-by time" in which the trucks
supplied by JBI were purportedly sitting in line at the Port Arthur
and Woodville facilities awaiting access to, or acceptance of, the
pellets.

This administrative expense request is clearly rooted in the
movant's transaction with the Debtors-in-Possession. It is also
unquestioned that, to the degree to which the pellets could
actually be relocated from the port facility, such relocation would
enhance the Debtors' efforts to restore its ordinary course
operations. However, the issue regarding which party was
responsible for the repeated delays that forced lines of trucks to
wait for loading for considerable periods of time is more
problematic. Though the Court has carefully reviewed a substantial
amount of documentary evidence submitted by the parties, such
evidence offers limited insight into the actual cause of the
disputed stand-by hours.

JBI has failed to establish that the Debtors were in any way
responsible for the delays occurring in the delivery of pellets to
the Woodville facility. In fact, JBI has failed to offer any
credible evidence to explain the charging of stand-by hours in
Woodville. The Debtors presented credible evidence without
contradiction that convoying by the truckers was, in fact,
occurring on the Woodville trips and none of the proffered evidence
indicated that any delay occurring on-site at the Woodville
facility was caused by any internal process occasioned by the
Debtors' normal transportation operations. With no other credible
explanation offered, JBI has failed to establish by a preponderance
of the evidence that the 167 hours which it billed as stand-by
hours in Woodville occurred due to the conduct of the Debtors and
for which the Debtors' estates should be held justly accountable.

The Debtors contend that the only delays that can be legitimately
charged to them are those that are documented by their personnel in
various Vessel Activity Reports and Port Logs. However, an analysis
of the entirety of the evidence presented at the hearing reveals
that the Debtors' internal documents do not supply a reliable,
comprehensive chronology of all of the intermittent delays that
constantly plagued the extraction process and delayed the
utilization of the trucks. Thus, upon review of the evidence
submitted, and imposing some degree of responsibility upon JBI for
the excessive accrual of stand-by hours arising from its failure to
control undue convoying of loaded trucks by its subcontractors, the
Court finds that JBI has established, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that 1,256.25 of the 1,892 stand-by hours billed by JBI
should be allowed.

In a review of the equities surrounding the parties' transaction,
JBI necessarily employed a number of small, independent truckers to
accommodate the Debtors' transportation request. The Court is
sympathetic to their plight. Nevertheless, $303,000 has already
been tendered to JBI for itself and its subcontractors and the
series of casualty events which have plagued this estate has cast a
greater degree of doubt upon the Debtors' realistic prospects for
achieving a successful conclusion to this case.

This has created a greater concern among administrative claimants
regarding the ultimate payment of their claims. Taking into
consideration the financial effect upon the claimant and its
subcontractors, the financial status of the estates, the
possibility that certain insurance proceeds have been received, or
are anticipated, by the Debtors with regard to these casualty
events, and the legitimate concerns of other administrative
claimants regarding payment, the Court finds that the Debtors
should immediately tender an additional payment of $125,000 to JBI,
with the remaining $237,287.38 of the allowed administrative claim
of JBI to be paid pursuant to the terms of any confirmed plan or
such other distribution mechanism as may be authorized in this
case.

A full-text copy of Judge Parker's Dec. 19, 2017 Memorandum of
Decision is available at https://is.gd/nVt4gE from Leagle.com.

Texas Pellets, Inc., Debtor, represented by C. Davin Boldissar --
dboldissar@lockelord.com -- Locke Lord LLP, William Steven Bryant
-- sbryant@lockelord.com -- Locke Lord LLP, Bradley Clay Knapp --
knapp@lockelord.com -- Locke Lord LLP, Emily Mott --
emily.mott@lockelord.com -- Locke Lord LLP, Jason R. Searcy --
jsearcy@jrsearcylaw.com --& Joshua P. Searcy --
joshsearcy@jrsearcylaw.com -- Searcy & Searcy, P.C.

US Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Timothy W. O'Neal --
Timothy.W.O'Neal@USDOJ.GOV -- Office of the U.S. Trustee, Timothy
W. O'Neal, Office of the U.S. Trustee & John M. Vardeman --
john.m.vardeman@usdoj.gov -- UST Office.

Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of Texas Pellets and German
Pellets, Creditor Committee, represented by Patrick Kelley --
patkelley@icklaw.com -- Ireland, Carroll, & Kelley.

                  About Texas Pellets, Inc.

Texas Pellets, Inc., based in Woodville, Texas, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-90126) on April 30, 2016.
The petition was signed by Anna Katherin Leibold, its president and
chief executive officer.

German Pellets Texas, LLC, also based in Woodville, Texas, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-90127) on April
30, 2016. The petition was signed by Peter H. Leibold, its chief
executive officer.

The cases have been jointly administered under Texas Pellets'
case.

Judge Bill Parker presides over the cases.

The Debtors employed William Steven Bryant, Esq., at Locke Lord LLP
as their legal counsel; Searcy & Searcy, P.C. as local/conflicts
co-counsel; and Guggenheim Securities, LLC, and Configure Partners,
LLC, as investment bankers. Bryan M. Gaston, and the firm
Opportune, LLP, serve as the Debtors' Chief Restructuring Officer.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed on May
17, 2016. No trustee or examiner has been appointed. Counsel for
the Committee is Patrick Kelley, Esq., at Ireland, Carroll & Kelly,
P.C.


TEXDOM INVESTMENTS: Taps Kurt Stephen as Legal Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Texdom Investments, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Texas to hire The Law Office of
Kurt Stephen, PLLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will assist the Debtor in the formulation of a Chapter 11
plan of reorganization or liquidation; discuss reorganization with
creditors; and provide other legal services related to its Chapter
11 case.

Kurt Stephen, Esq., the attorney who will be handling the case,
charges an hourly fee of $375.  His firm received a pre-bankruptcy
retainer of $5,500 and an initial retainer of $20,000.

Mr. Stephen disclosed in a court filing that he and his firm do not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor or its estate.

The firm can be reached through:

     Kurt Stephen, Esq.
     Law Office of Kurt Stephen, PLLC
     100 S. Bicentennial Blvd.
     McAllen, TX 78501-7050
     Tel: 956-631-3381
     Fax: 956-687-5542
     Email: kurtstep@swbell.net

                     About Texdom Investments

Founded in 2013, Texdom Investments, LLC, owns apartment properties
in McAllen, Texas, valued by the company at $4.6 million.

Texdom Investments filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Case No. 17-70485) on Dec. 14, 2017.  Ramon I. Rodriguez, manager,
signed the petition.  At the time of filing, the Debtor disclosed
$4.62 million in total assets and $4.42 million in total
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Eduardo V. Rodriguez.


TITAN ENERGY: Covenant Problems Raise Going Concern Doubt
---------------------------------------------------------
Titan Energy, LLC, filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q,
disclosing a net loss of $17.55 million on $45.35 million of total
revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2017.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company listed a
net income of $5.86 million on $215.24 million of total revenues.

At September 30, 2017, the Company had total assets of $605.42
million, total liabilities of $605.49 million, and a $61,000 in
total stockholders' deficit.

Titan Energy were not in compliance with certain of the financial
covenants under its credit facilities as of December 31, 2016, as
well as the requirement to deliver audited financial statements
without a going concern qualification.  The Company's financial
covenants will not be tested again until the quarter ending
December 31, 2017.  The Company does not currently have sufficient
liquidity to repay all of its outstanding indebtedness, and as a
result, there is substantial doubt regarding its ability to
continue as a going concern.  The Company has classified $538.1
million of outstanding indebtedness under its credit facilities,
which is net of $1.7 million of deferred financing costs, as
current portion of long term debt, net within the Company's
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2017,
based on the occurrence of the event of default, the lenders under
the Company's credit facilities, as applicable, could elect to
declare all amounts outstanding immediately due and payable and the
lenders could terminate all commitments to extend further credit.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/10xjt3

                     About Titan Energy, LLC

Titan Energy, LLC, operates as an independent developer and
producer of natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids in the
United States.  It operates through three segments: Gas and Oil
Production, Well Construction and Completion, and Other Partnership
Management.  The company owns interest in various producing natural
gas and oil wells located primarily in the Eagle Ford Shale in
south Texas; the Raton Basin in northern New Mexico; the Black
Warrior Basin in central Alabama; the Rangely Field in northwest
Colorado; the Barnett Shale and Marble Falls in North Texas; the
Mississippi Lime and Hunton in northwestern Oklahoma; Niobrara
Shale assets in northneastern Colorado; and the Appalachia Basin.
The Company also sponsors and manages tax-advantaged investment
natural gas and oil partnerships.  Titan Energy, LLC, was founded
in 2011 and is based in Fort Worth, Texas.



TRIMUR PARTNERS: Case Summary & List of Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------------------
Affiliates that filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code:

   Debtor                                         Case No.
   ------                                         --------
   Trimur Partners, Inc.                          18-10001
   2707 Kerrybrook Lane
   Austin, TX 78757

   KRK CP, LLC                                    18-10002
     dba Kids R Kids Cedar Park
   1404 Lakeline Blvd.
   Cedar Park, TX 78613

Business Description: Cedar Park, Texas-based Kids R Kids Cedar
                      Park offers full time care for children from
                      six-weeks to five years including an
                      accredited academic curriculum and
                      enrichment programs.  The company provides
                      before and after school care for children
                      from kindergarten through 5th grade.  It
                      also offers full day summer camps for school
                      age children.  

                      Web site: https://www.krkcedarpark.com

                      Trimur Partners, Inc., KRK CP's landlord, is
                      an Austin, Texas-based company that is
                      engaged in the real estate leasing business.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 1, 2018

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Western District of Texas (Austin)

Debtors' Counsel: Frank B. Lyon, Esq.
                  FRANK B. LYON - ATTORNEY AT LAW
                  Two Far West Plaza #170
                  3508 Far West Blvd.
                  Austin, TX 78731
                  Tel: (512) 345-8964
                  Fax: (512) 697-0047
                  E-mail: franklyon@me.com
                          frank@franklyon.com

Assets and Liabilities:

                      Assets            Liabilities
                     ---------          -----------
Trimur Partners     $3,800,000          $3,780,000
KRK CP, LLC     $100,000-$500,000  $1,000,000-$10,000,000

Patrick W. Murphey, president, signed the petitions.

A full-text copy of Trimur Partners' petition, along with a list of
four unsecured creditors, is available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb18-10001.pdf

A full-text copy of KRK CP's petition, along with a list of two
unsecured creditors, is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/txwb18-10002.pdf


V. CRUZ MD: Seeks to Hire A+ Accounting and Tax
-----------------------------------------------
V. Cruz, M.D., PLLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to hire A+ Accounting and Tax as
its accountant.

The firm will assist the Debtor in preparing court-ordered reports,
including monthly operating reports and corporate periodic reports,
and any document necessary for the Debtor's disclosure statement.

Akshay Dave, the accountant who will be providing the services,
will charge $175 per hour.  The hourly fees for the accounting
staff range from $50 to $100.

A+ Accounting does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor
or its estate, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Akshay Dave
     A+ Accounting and Tax
     P.O. Box 372
     Brandon, FL 33509-0372
     Tel: (813) 381-3809
     Email: tax4002@gmail.com

                     About V. Cruz, M.D. PLLC

V. Cruz, M.D., PLLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08466) on October 3,
2017.  Victor D. Cruz, its manager, signed the petition.  At the
time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated
assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

Judge Catherine Peek Mcewen presides over the case.  Buddy D. Ford
P.A. is the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


VILLA PROPERTIES: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Villa Properties, LLC
        P.O. Box 3427
        Southfield, MI 48037

Type of Business: Villa Properties, LLC, is a privately held
                  company whose principal place of business is
                  located at 30320 Pondsview, Franklin, MI 48025.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: January 2, 2018

Case No.: 18-40003

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit)

Judge: Hon. Marci B McIvor

Debtor's Counsel: Mark H. Shapiro, Esq.
                  STEINBERG SHAPIRO & CLARK
                  25925 Telegraph Rd., Suite 203
                  Southfield, MI 48033-2518
                  Tel: (248) 352-4700
                  Fax: (248) 352-4488
                  E-mail: shapiro@steinbergshapiro.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Timothy Bakeman, manager.

A copy of the Debtor's list of 20 largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb18-40003_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/mieb18-40003.pdf


WALTER INVESTMENTS: Stock Transfer Protocol Has Interim Approval
----------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
entered an interim order:

     (i) finding that Walter Investment Management Corp.'s
consolidated net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax
attributes, including the Debtor's net unrealized built-in losses,
are the property of the Debtor's estate and are protected by
Section 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code;

    (ii) finding that trading in WIMC common stock and claims
against the Debtor could limit its ability to use the tax
attributes for the purpose of the bankruptcy case and following the
effective date of the prepackaged plan; and

   (iii) approving procedures for the transfer of ownership of
securities and claims to preserve the tax attributes pursuant to
Section 105(a) and 362(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.

These procedures and restrictions have been approved by the Court
and will apply to holding and trading WIMC stock:

     (A) Notice of substantial WIMC stock ownership

Any person or entity that beneficially owns, at any time on or
after the motion date, WIMC stock in an amount sufficient to
qualify such person or entity as a substantial equity holder will
file with the Court, and serve upon the Debtor and the Debtor's
counsel, a notice of substantial stock ownership, which describes
specifically and in detail the beneficial ownership of WIMC stock
of such person or entity, on or before the date that is the later
of: (a) five business days after the entry of the interim order and
(b) five business days after that person or entity qualifies as a
substantial equityholder.  At the holder's election, the notice of
substantial stock ownership to be filed with the Court may be
redacted to exclude such holder's taxpayer identification number
and the number of shares of WIMC stock that such holder
beneficially owns.

     (B) Acquisition of WIMC stock or options

At least 20 business days prior to the proposed date of any
acquisition or other transfer of equity securities that would
result in an increase in the amount of WIMC stock beneficially
owned by a substantially equityholder or that would result in a
person or entity becoming a substantial equityholder, such person,
entity or substantial equityholder will file with the Court, and
serve upon the Debtor and the Debtor's counsel, a notice of intent
to purchase, acquire, or otherwise accumulate WIMC stock, which
describes specifically and in detail the proposed transaction in
which WIMC stock is to be acquired or beneficial ownership of WIMC
is to be increased.  At the holder's election, the equity
acquisition notice that is filed with the Court may be redacted to
exclude such holder's taxpayer identification number and the number
of shares of WIMC stock that such holder beneficial owns and
proposes to purchase or otherwise acquire.

     (C) Disposition of WIMC stock or options

At least, 20 business days prior to the proposed date of any sale,
disposition or other transfer of equity securities that would
result in a decrease in the amount of WIMC Stock beneficially owned
by a substantial equityholder or that would result in a person or
entity ceasing to be a substantial equityholder, such person,
entity, or substantial equityholder will file with the Court, and
serve upon the Debtor and the Debtor's counsel, notice of intent to
sell, trade, or otherwise transfer WIMC stock.  At the holder's
election, the equity disposition notice that is filed with the
Court may be redacted to exclude such holder's taxpayer
identification number and the number of shares of WIMC stock that
such holder beneficially owns and proposes to sell or otherwise
transfer.

The Debtor will have 15 business days after the filing of an equity
trading notice to file with the Court and serve on a proposed
equity transferee or proposed equity transferor, as the case may
be, an objection to any proposed transfer of equity securities.

A substantial equity holder is any person or entity that
beneficially owns a number of shares of WIMC's commons stock
representing 4.75% or more of all issued and outstanding shares of
WIMC common stock.

                    About Walter Investment

Based in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania and established in 1958,
Walter Investment Management Corp., formerly known as Walter
Investment Management LLC -- http://www.walterinvestment.com/-- is
a diversified mortgage banking firm focused primarily on servicing
and originating residential loans, including reverse loans.  The
company services a wide array of loans across the credit spectrum
for its own portfolio and for GSEs, government agencies,
third-party securitization trusts and other credit owners.  The
company originates and purchases residential loans that it
predominantly sells to GSEs and government entities.

Walter Investment commenced a prepackaged chapter 11 case (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-13446) with a plan of reorganization
where the Company commits to reduce its outstanding corporate debt
by approximately $806 million through a combination of cancellation
of debt ($531 million) and principal paydowns ($275 million).

As of Sept. 30, 2017, the Debtor had total assets of $14.97 billion
and total debt of $15.21 billion.

The case is assigned to Hon. James L. Garrity Jr.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, is the Debtor's counsel, with the
engagement led by Sunny Singh, Esq., Ray C. Schrock, P.C., and
Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq.  The Debtor's investment banker is
Houlihan Lokey Capital, Inc.  The Debtor's Restructuring Advisor is
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC.  The Debtor's claims and
noticing agent is Prime Clerk LLC.


WORCESTER RE: Unsecureds to Recoup 2% Under Proposed Plan
---------------------------------------------------------
Worcester RE Investments LLC filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Massachusetts a disclosure statement referring
to its plan of reorganization.

The principal components of the plan are to modify the payment of
the debts secured by the existing first mortgages by bifurcating
the plans and paying the full amount of the secured value, but by
altering the terms and conditions of the notes and spreading out
the newly recapitalized loan amounts over an extended period of
time, and paying 2% of the unsecured, deficiency portion of the
claims. The borrowers on the existing notes are Paul D. McKunes and
Janine E. McKunes. The modified notes will become direct
obligations of the Debtor. The mortgages against the Debtor's
properties will be limited to the amount of the secured claims and
modified notes and mortgage modification agreements will be
executed by the parties and recorded with the Registry of Deeds.

The Debtor will pay the unsecured creditors 2% of their claims and
provide for the payment of administrative fees and U.S. trustee
payments.

The funding for the Plan will come from rental income from the
residential tenants at the properties, from a capital contribution
from Felicio Lana, principal, and manager of Debtor, in the
approximate amount of $40,000 to cover Administrative Expenses, and
from the cash in the Debtor in Possession Accounts on the
Distribution Date.

The contribution by Mr. Felicio Lana, estimated to be $40,000 in
order for Debtor to have sufficient funds to make its payments
under the Plan constitutes "new value" and is essential to ensure
the viability of the Reorganized Debtor.

A full-text copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/mab17-40511-107.pdf

              About Worcester RE Investments

Based in Worcester, Massachusetts, Worcester Re Investments, LLC,
owns 4 multi-family residential rental properties located at 23
Sigourney Street, Worcester, Massachusetts; 6 Hobson Street,
Worcester, Massachusetts; 6 Dorchester Street, Worcester,
Massachusetts; and 35 East Main Street, Milford, Massachusetts.
  
Worcester RE Investments sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 17-40511) on March 23, 2017, estimating assets of
$500,000 to $1 million and debt of $1 million to $10 million.  The
petition was signed by Felicio Lana, manager.  

Judge Christopher J. Panos is assigned to the case.

The Debtor tapped Gary M. Hogan, Esq., as Baker, Braverman &
Barbadoro, P.C., as counsel.

No trustee or examiner has been appointed in this proceeding, and
no creditors committee has yet been formed.


[^] Recent Small-Dollar & Individual Chapter 11 Filings
-------------------------------------------------------
In re Construction Materials Testing Services, Inc.
   Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 17-73174
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/arwb17-73174.pdf
         represented by: Marc Honey, Esq.
                         HONEY LAW FIRM, P.A.
                         E-mail: mhoney@honeylawfirm.com

In re Ruthless Corp.
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-10547
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-10547.pdf
         represented by: Samantha L. Dammer, Esq.
                         TAMPA LAW ADVOCATES,P.A.
                         E-mail: sdammer@attysam.com

In re Addison Randolph Crockett
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-10561
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 21, 2017
         represented by: Justin M. Luna, Esq.
                         LATHAM, SHUKER, EDEN & BEAUDINE, LLP
                         E-mail: jluna@lseblaw.com

In re Vera Crowley
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-16769
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 21, 2017
         Filed Pro Se

In re Global Lifestyle LLC
   Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 17-16795
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nvb17-16795.pdf
         represented by: David A. Riggi, Esq.
                         RIGGI LAW FIRM
                         E-mail: darnvbk@gmail.com

In re Solid Concrete Walls Co., LLC
   Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-35521
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/njb17-35521.pdf
         represented by: Maureen P. Steady, Esq.
                         KURTZMAN | STEADY, LLC
                         E-mail: msteady@mac.com

In re Zimmer Sales & Services Corp.
   Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-21357
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 21, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nywb17-21357.pdf
         represented by: David H. Ealy, Esq.
                         TREVETT, CRISTO, SALZER & ANDOLINA P.C.
                         E-mail: dealy@trevettcristo.com

In re Walter Charnoff
   Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-21594
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         represented by: Lee M. Kutner, Esq.
                         E-mail: lmk@kutnerlaw.com

In re Gary Allen Russell and Diane Marie Jean Russell
   Bankr. N.D. Fla. Case No. 17-50356
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         represented by: Natasha Z. Revell, Esq.
                         ZALKIN REVELL, PLLC
                         E-mail: tasha@zalkinrevell.com

In re Maryland Home Inspectors, Inc.
   Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-27122
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/mdb17-27122.pdf
         represented by: Ronald J. Drescher, Esq.
                         DRESCHER & ASSOCIATES
                         E-mail: ecfdrescherlaw@gmail.com

In re 40 Carleton Avenue Corp.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-77838
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb17-77838.pdf
         represented by: Raymond W. Verdi, Jr., Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND W. VERDI, JR., PC
                         E-mail: rwvlaw@yahoo.com

In re 46 Carleton Avenue Corp.
   Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-77840
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb17-77840.pdf
         represented by: Raymond W Verdi, Jr., Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND W. VERDI, JR., PC
                         E-mail: rwvlaw@yahoo.com

In re Timothy A. Pfister and Elizabeth Pfister
   Bankr. N.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-61659
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         represented by: Randy J. Schaal, Esq.
                         E-mail: randyjschaalattorney@cnymail.com

In re Pry Way Trucking Co., Inc.
   Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 17-40471
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/ncwb17-40471.pdf
         represented by: William S. Gardner, Esq.
                         GARDNER LAW OFFICES, PLLC
                         E-mail: Billgardner@gardnerlawoffices.com

In re Timothy J. Hyland and Billie Jo Hyland
   Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 17-44706
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         represented by: Jacob D DeGraaff, Esq.
                         HENRY & DEGRAAFF, PS
                         E-mail: mainline@hdm-legal.com

In re B. Valdez Construction & Development, Inc.
   Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No. 17-50262
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 23, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txsb17-50246.pdf
         represented by: Carl Michael Barto, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICE OF CARL M. BARTO
                         E-mail: cmblaw@netscorp.net

In re Jesiefin Pascua and Ricardo Pascua
   Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 16-07624
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 22, 2017
         represented by: Francisco J. Aldana, Esq.
                         LAW OFFICES OF FRANCISCO JAVIER ALDANA
                         E-mail: francisco@aldanalawoffice.com

In re Glenda Peevyhouse
   Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case No. 16-43165
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb17-43165.pdf
         Filed Pro Se

In re Vileno Environmental, LLC
   Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 16-07974
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 26, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-07974.pdf
         represented by: Jeffrey Ainsworth, Esq.
                         BRANSONLAW PLLC
                         E-mail: jeff@bransonlaw.com

In re Clinton J. Mahoney
   Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 16-38099
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 27, 2017
         represented by: Gregory K Stern, Esq.
                         GREGORY K. STERN, P.C.
                         E-mail: gstern1@flash.net

In re Grott Properties, LL
   Bankr. N.D. Ind. Case No. 16-32440
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 27, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/innb17-32440.pdf
         represented by: Thomas F. Godfrey, Esq.
                         THOMAS F. GODFREY LAW OFFICE
                         E-mail: thomasfgodfreylaw@yahoo.com

In re Rollyn and Carolyn Lee
   Bankr. W.D. Wis. Case No. 16-14369
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 27, 2017
         represented by: Thomas J. Flynn, Esq.
                         LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINKGREN, LTD.
                         E-mail: tflynn@larkinhoffman.com

In re Kyle Douglass Driver and Gwendolyn Gholson Driver
   Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-25681
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 27, 2017
         represented by: Anthony Obehi Egbase, Esq.
                         A.O.E LAW & ASSOCIATES, APC
                         E-mail: info@aoelaw.com

In re Shaw Trucking, Inc.
   Bankr. E.D. Tex. Case No. 16-42849
      Chapter 11 Petition filed December 28, 2017
         See http://bankrupt.com/misc/txeb17-42849.pdf
         represented by: Eric A. Liepins, Esq.
                         ERIC A. LIEPINS P.C.
                         E-mail: eric@ealpc.com


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2018.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***