TCR_Public/171205.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Tuesday, December 5, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 338

                            Headlines

203 LENA: Taps Morrison-Tenenbaum as Legal Counsel
21ST CENTURY: PCO Files 3rd Report
264 LAGOON: Hires Joel Aresty as Attorney
654 SARATOGA ROAD: Jan. 3 Hearing on Disclosures Approval
76 CHESTNUT STREET: Taps Arlene Gordon-Oliver as Counsel

ACADIANA MANAGEMENT: PCO Files 2nd Interim Report for Albuquerque
ACADIANA MANAGEMENT: PCO Files 2nd Interim Report for Edmond/Mercy
ALEVO USA: Seeks March 16 Plan Exclusivity Period Extension
ALTON BEAN: Hires Honey Law Firm as Counsel
AMG INTERNATIONAL: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Moved to Jan. 30

APOLLO ENSOSURGERY: PTV Sciences Has 24% Equity Stake
AUTO MASTERS: Committee Taps Gullett Sanford as Legal Counsel
AVAYA INC: Verizon Objects to Cure in Contracts Under Plan
AVAYA INC: Wants Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Jan. 1
B & B METALS: January 16 Hearing on Amended Disclosure Statement

BCP RENAISSANCE: Fitch Rates $1.25BB Sr. Secured Term Loans 'BB-'
BEBE STORES: Stockholders Elected Five Directors to Board
BERNSOHN & FETNER: Taps Mayerson as Legal Counsel
BIG TIME HOLDINGS: Ch. 11 Trustee Hires Rosenberg Musso as Attorney
BILLNAT CORP: Ombudsman Makes Recommendations on IP Sale

BIOSCRIP INC: Appoints Tony Lopez as VP & Chief Accounting Officer
BON-TON STORES: Pays Top Management $1.9M Retention Awards
BOND AND COMPANY: Plan Filing Deadline Extended Through Jan. 12
BOWLING GREEN: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
C SWANK ENTERPRISES: Hunter to be Paid Over 7 Years at 3.75%

CBK FUTURES: Hires Wickens Herzer Panza Cook as Counsel
CBK FUTURES: Taps Wickens Herzer as Legal Counsel
CCT COMMUNICATIONS: Did Not Commit Breach of Purchase Agreement
COBALT INTERNATIONAL: Forgoes $8.1 Million Notes Interest Payment
COCRYSTAL PHARMA: Raises $1 Million in Debt Financing

COLORADO NATIONAL: Committee Taps Markus Williams Young as Counsel
CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Falls Short of Nasdaq's Bid Price Rule
CONNEAUT LAKE VOLUNTEER: Unsecureds to Recoup 5% Under Plan
CTI BIOPHARMA: Had $31.5M Net Financial Standing as of Oct. 31
DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL: Tap Ferrere Abogados as Ecuador Counsel

EAST NY REALTY: Taps Mishiyeva Law as Legal Counsel
ENCLAVE BUSINESS: Hires Property Services Group as Appraiser
ENVIGO INTERNATIONAL: Moody's Rates $300MM Sr. Sec. Term Loan B3
EVERGREEN PRODUCTS: Taps Guarino Law as Counsel
EXELCO INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors

FIDELITY & GUARANTY: Fitch Ups IDR & Sr. Unsec. Note Rating to BB
FIELDPOINT PETROLEUM: Approved for Quotation on OTC Markets
FORESIGHT ENERGY: Declares Dividend on Common Units
FORTY ACRE: Continental, et al., Lose Bid to Junk Trust's Claims
GEK REALTY: Taps Pick & Zabicki as New Legal Counsel

GEORGIA ANESTHESIA: Hires Morris Manning as Special Counsel
GIGAMON INC: Fitch Assigns First-Time 'B' IDR; Outlook Stable
GIGAMON INC: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR; Outlook Positive
GNC HOLDINGS: Fitch Cuts IDR to B on Revised Financing Proposal
GORDMANS STORES: Liquidation Plan Declared Effective

H3C INC: Hires Ackerman Fox as Bankruptcy Counsel
HARTFORD COURT: Latest Plan Discloses Settlement with the Wejdas
HATHAWAY HOMES: Hires Jay Kohler as Attorney
HELIOS AND MATHESON: Files Q3 Interim Financial Statements
HELIOS AND MATHESON: Invests Additional $1.8M in MoviePass

HHGREGG INC: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Through Feb. 5
HRG GROUP: Fitch Upgrades Sr. Secured Notes to BB
IGNITE RESTAURANT: U.S. Trustee, Other Parties Object to Plan
IHEARTCOMMUNICATIONS INC: Continues Talks on Debt Restructuring
IMPERIAL PALMS: Needs More Time to Finalize Sale Pact, File Plan

INDEPENDENCE TAX II: Completes Liquidation and Winding-Up
INGERSOLL FINANCIAL: Hires Frank Martin Wolff as Attorney
INLAND ENVIRONMENTAL: Hearing on Plan Confirmation Set for March 1
IREP MONTGOMERY-MRF: Court Extends Exclusive Plan Filing Date
IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: Seeks Name Change Amid Assets Sale to BBI

JAMES HARDIE: Moody's Rates Proposed $400MM Sr. Unsec. Notes Ba1
M & G USA: Taps Crain Caton & James as Special Counsel
MARKET SQUARE: Has Until January 10 to File Chapter 11 Plan
MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions as Claims Agent
MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Livingstone as Investment Banker

MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Silverman as Financial Advisor
MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Young Conaway as Counsel
MAURICE SPORTING: U.S. Trustee Forms Seven-Member Committee
MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS: John Mendelsohn Resigns as Director
METROPOLITAN DIAGNOSTIC: Seeks Interim OK on Cash Collateral Use

MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Bares $9M Wind Down Expense Budget for 2018
MULTICARE HOME: Must Show Cause Necessity of PCO Appointment
N3C INC: Hires EisnerAmper as Accountant
NAVILLUS TILE: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
NAVITAS MIDSTREAM: Fitch Assigns First Time B Long-Term IDR

NILHAN FINANCIAL: Hires Moffa & Breuer as Special Counsel
NORTH FORK GROUP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
OCEAN CLUB: Taps Jeffery C. Patrick as Accountant
OCEAN CLUB: Taps Stichter Riedel as Legal Counsel
OHLONE TRIBE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

OKEECHOBEE CC-I LAND: Case Summary & 9 Top Unsecured Creditors
PAC ANCHOR: Committee Taps Armory Consulting as Financial Advisor
PARETEUM CORP: Gets $6.58M From Private Placement Financing
PARETEUM CORP: Underwriter Buys 1.4M Additional Shares
PFO GLOBAL: Case Converted into Liquidation Proceeding

PLASCO TOOLING: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
PLAZA BROADWAY: Vaquero's Bid for Ch. 11 Trustee Appointment Junked
PREMIER EXHIBITIONS: Seeks Approval of Assets Sale Procedures
PRODUCTION PATTERN: Taps W. Donald Gieseke as CRO
PROVEN PEST: New Plan Discloses $2K Claim by GA Revenue Dept.

REAL INDUSTRY: Files DIP Loan-Related Agreements to Court
REAL INDUSTRY: Seeks to Hire Saul Ewing as Co-Counsel
REAL INDUSTRY: Taps Morrison & Foerster as Legal Counsel
RICHARDSON INVESTMENTS: Whites Buying Joelton Property for $50,000
ROSETTA GENOMICS: Fails to Comply with Nasdaq's Bid Price Rule

SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Dec. 23
SKY-SKAN INC: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
SOUTH SHORE PAINTING: Hires McIntyre Thanasides as Counsel
STATESBORO LIFE: Case Summary & 6 Largest Unsecured Creditors
TAYLOR-WHARTON: Bid to Amend Discrimination Suit Rejected

TDR TRUST: January 10 Plan Confirmation Hearing
TERRAVIA HOLDINGS: January 8 Plan Confirmation Hearing
TOYS R US: Seeks Court Approval of Sr. Executive Incentive Plan
UNITY COURIER: Needs More Time to Solicit Acceptances of Plan
UNIVE INC: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Dec. 19

VIRGINIA HIGH TECH: Wants to Keep Plan Exclusivity Until Feb. 4
WARWICK YARD: DOJ Watchdog Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL: Will Hold Its Annual Meeting on April 27
WESTMORELAND COAL: Kevin Paprzycki Resigns as CEO
WESTMORELAND RESOURCE: Extends GP Services Agreement to April 2018

WESTMORELAND RESOURCE: Kevin A. Paprzycki Resigns as CEO
WESTPAC RESTORATION: Taps BKD LLP as Accountant
XFS INVESTMENTS: Hires W. Steven Shumway as Counsel
[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet

                            *********

203 LENA: Taps Morrison-Tenenbaum as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
203 Lena Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York to hire Morrison-Tenenbaum, PLLC as
its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; assist in the
preparation of a plan of reorganization; and provide other legal
services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Lawrence Morrison     $495
     Associates            $350
     Paraprofessionals     $150

Morrison-Tenenbaum received a retainer in the sum of $15,000, and
$1,717 for the filing fee.

Lawrence Morrison, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that his firm
is a "disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Lawrence F. Morrison, Esq.
     Morrison-Tenenbaum, PLLC
     87 Walker Street, Floor 2
     New York, NY 10013
     Phone: 212-620-0938
     Email: lmorrison@m-t-law.com

                        About 203 Lena Inc.

203 Lena Inc., doing business as COCINA TALLER, sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No.
17-23274) on August 16, 2017.  Darlo Oleaga, its secretary, signed
the petition.

The Debtor operates a restaurant at 416 West 203 Street, NY 10034.
At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$500,000.

Judge Robert D. Drain presides over the case.


21ST CENTURY: PCO Files 3rd Report
----------------------------------
Melanie L. Cyganowski, as the Patient Care Ombudsman in the chapter
11 cases of 21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., and its
affiliates, submits a Third Report to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York, which sets forth her overall
observations during her visits to the California locations.

On October 24, 2017, with the assistance of Gary Delanois, SVP of
Operations for 21st Century, and Kathryn Boling, Regional VP of
Central California, the PCO visited three facilities in
California:

       (a) Cabrillo Radiation Oncology Center in Ventura;

       (b) North Oaks Radiation Oncology Center in Thousand Oaks;
and

       (c) Simi Valley Radiation Oncology Center in Simi Valley.

The PCO finds that the three offices that she visited are part of a
larger group of nine facilities located in Central California that
are all part of the Coastal Radiation Oncology Medical Group, Inc.

During the visit to California facilities, the PCO has been given
the opportunity to speak with several of the technicians and
doctors at each office – specifically, Dr. Thomas Fogel (at the
Ventura office), Dr. Eugene Ahn (at the Simi Valley office), and
Dr. Paul Miller (at the Thousand Oaks office), guiding her of the
typical step by step process a patient will go through during each
visit, including an explanation of the different radiation
procedures and equipment utilized at each site.

The PCO makes these observations of the California facilities:

       (a) clean, professional, and welcoming environments at each
of the offices visited;

       (b) physicians (reflecting all years of experience) that are
at the top of their fields and are dedicated to their work and
their patients;

       (c) staff that is friendly and knowledgeable;

       (d) regional management who knew the history, equipment, and
personnel at each of the offices under their supervision;

       (e) state of the art technology and multiple treatment
offerings, which provide patients with the full array of options
within each region; and

       (f) patient volume and physician retention has remained
consistent.

The PCO shares that the doctors were pleased with the continuing
support from the Debtors, there were no reported delays in the
receipt of supplies, the back office services provided to the
facilities continued to function efficiently, and the doctors were
very complementary of the degree of communication that they have
been receiving during the bankruptcy cases from management -- which
enabled them to anticipate and be prepared for questions from
patients, referring doctors, and suppliers.

The PCO commends the management for doing an excellent job of
keeping the lines of communication open, proactively engaging with
physicians and other employees to allay any concerns and arm them
with useful information.

In addition, the PCO concludes that after visiting six facilities
in Florida (the focus of her last report) and three facilities in
California, in addition to multiple conversations with management
and regional VPs, that patient care has not been impacted in any
material manner by the bankruptcy cases. Physician and employee
retention appears to be stable, the delivery of supplies has not
been interrupted, and the facilities continue to have access to
state of the art technology for treatment. The physicians and other
employees reported no changes that they have observed since the
bankruptcy filings.

The PCO would continue to recommend 21st Century Oncology to anyone
in need of the cancer care provided at their facilities.

A full-text copy of the PCO's Third Report, dated November 16,
2017, is available for free at https://tinyurl.com/y8zprdeu

                 About 21st Century Oncology

21st Century Oncology Holdings, Inc., is a global provider of
integrated cancer care services.  As of March 31, 2017, the company
operated 179 treatment centers, including 143 centers located in 17
U.S. states and 36 centers located in seven countries in Latin
America.

21st Century and 59 U.S. affiliates filed Chapter 11 petitions
under the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-22770)
on May 25, 2017.  At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated
their assets and debt at $1 billion to $10 billion.

The cases are pending before the Hon. Judge Robert D. Drain.

Lorenzo Marinuzzi, Esq., at Morrison & Foerster LLP, serves as the
Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC is
the Debtors' claims and noticing agent.

On June 8, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee has
tapped Morrison & Foerster LLP as counsel and Berkeley Research
Group, LLC, and financial advisor.


264 LAGOON: Hires Joel Aresty as Attorney
-----------------------------------------
264 Lagoon Dr Lido Beach NY LLC seeks authority from the United
States Bankrutpcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to
employ Joel M. Aresty of the law firm of Joel M. Aresty, P.A., as
attorney.

Professional services Joel Aresty will render are:

     (a) give advice to the debtor with respect to its powers and
duties as a debtor in possession and the continued management of
its business operations;

     (b) advise the debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
complying with the U.S. trustee's Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements and with the rules of the court;

     (c) prepare motions, pleadings, orders, applications,
adversary proceedings, and other legal documents necessary in the
administration of the case;

     (d) protect the interest of the debtor in all matters pending
before the court;

     (e) represent the debtor in negotiation with its creditors in
the preparation of a plan.

Joel M. Aresty, employed by the law firm of Joel M. Aresty P.A.,
attests that neither he nor the firm represent any interest adverse
to the debtor, or the estate, and they are disinterested persons as
required by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 327(a).

The Debtor could only afford a very small pre-petition retainer and
the filing fee in this case, and has therefore been asked to
contribute additional retainer from outside the estate of debtor
going forward.

The Firm can be reached through:

     Joel M. Aresty, Esq.
     JOEL M. ARESTY, P.A.
     309 1st Ave S
     Tierra Verde, FL 33715
     Phone: 305-904-1903
     Fax: 800-559-1870
     E-mail: Aresty@Mac.com

            About 264 Lagoon Dr Lido Beach NY LLC

Based in Miami Beach, Florida, 264 Lagoon Dr Lido Beach NY LLC
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-23136) on
October 30, 2017, listing under $1 million both in assets and
liabilities. The Debtor is represented by Joel M. Aresty, Esq. of
Joel M. Aresty, PA as counsel.


654 SARATOGA ROAD: Jan. 3 Hearing on Disclosures Approval
---------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert E. Littlefield of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of New York will convene a hearing on Jan. 3,
2018, at 10:30 a.m. to consider the approval of 654 Saratoga Road,
LLC's disclosure statement describing its chapter 11 reorganization
plan.

Written objections to the Disclosure Statement must be filed and
served no later than seven days prior to the Disclosure Hearing
date.

Headquartered in Clifton Park, New York, 654 Saratoga Road, LLC,
has been the holding company of real property improved by a
tavern/restaurant since May 4, 2012.  It owns a 4.8-acre parcel of
real property located at 654 Saratoga Road, Glenville, New York
12302.  

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
N.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-10649) on April 6, 2017, estimating its assets
and liabilities at between $500,001 and $1 million each.

Michael Leo Boyle, Esq., at Tully Rinckey PLLC serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


76 CHESTNUT STREET: Taps Arlene Gordon-Oliver as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
76 Chestnut Street, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of New York to employ Arlene
Gordon-Oliver & Associates, PLLC, as its attorneys.

Services required of AGOPLLC are:

     a. give advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and
duties as Debtor-in-Possession and the continued management of its
property and affairs;

     b. negotiate with creditors of the Debtor and work out a plan
of reorganization and take the necessary legal steps in order to
effectuate such a plan, including negotiations with creditors and
other parties in interest;

     c. prepare the necessary answers, orders, reports and other
legal papers required of a Debtor who seeks protection from its
creditors;

     d. appear before the court to protect the interests of the
Debtor and represent the Debtor in all matters pending before the
Court;

     e. advise the Debtor in connection with any potential
refinancing of secured debt or any potential sale of the business;

     f. represent the Debtor in connection with obtaining
post-petition financing; and

     g. take any necessary action to obtain approval of a
disclosure statement and confirmation of a plan of reorganization.

Standard hourly rates of AGOPLLC are:

     Arlene Gordon-Oliver         $485
     Law Clerk/Paraprofessionals  $150

Arlene Gordon-Oliver, Esq. attests that AGOOLLC does not hold or
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor’s estate, and
AGOPLLC is a disinterested as defined in  Bankruptcy Code Sec.
101(14).

AGOPLLC maintains office at:

     Arlene Gordon-Oliver, Esq.
     ARLENE GORDON-OLIVER & ASSOCIATES, PLLC
     199 Main Street, Suite 203
     White Plains, NY 10601
     Tel: (914) 683-9750
     E-mail: ago@gordonoliverlaw.com

                   About 76 Chestnut Street, LLC

Based in Tarrytown, New York, 76 Chestnut Street, LLC filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-23676) on December
16, 2016, listing under $1 million both in assets and liabilities.

The Debtor is represented by Arlene Gordon-Oliver, Esq. at Arlene
Gordon-Oliver & Associates, PLLC as counsel.


ACADIANA MANAGEMENT: PCO Files 2nd Interim Report for Albuquerque
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Susan N. Goodman, the appointed patient care ombudsman for Acadiana
Management Group, LLC, submits her second interim report regarding
her evaluation of the quality of patient care provided at AMG
Specialty Hospital - Albuquerque.

The Albuquerque facility did not demonstrate patient care decline.
Since the First Report, the Albuquerque CEO moved to Las Vegas with
the former Chief Clinical Officer assuming Interim CEO duties and a
well-respected, multi-faceted clinical nurse assuming the Interim
CCO role. Staff, physicians, and patients alike speak positively
regarding the interim leadership. Because this AMG location
continues to demonstrate strong census, wound care staffing,
infection preventionist data analytics, and cross-functional team
dynamics, the PCO will consider moving this location to a 90-day
visit cycle with a remote-monitoring report every 60 days, in the
interest of stewardship so long as these current stability dynamics
remain.

Facility census was 23, moving to 24 on the date of PCO's site
visit out of a total maximum capacity of 25. Clinical staff patient
care ratios were reported as consistent with the staffing matrix.
The PCO interviewed more than 25% of the patient population. No
bankruptcy-related concerns were elicited. AMG and building
facility staff were quick to engage on a family member concern that
related to a patient room thermostat temperature that was
controlled by a zone thermostat control.

The dedicated materials management team member was present at the
facility this visit. Other than the one vendor challenge, supply
sourcing issues were generally denied. PCO confirmed that the
inventory management process is manual with the team member having
developed a sense of order points and needs that are not formally
documented in an item master or with set minimum/maximum par
levels.

The cross-functional, cohesive team dynamic at the Albuquerque
facility remains strong and refreshingly apparent. Staff was
consistently seen working cooperatively in patient rooms. Given the
stability that has been maintained under the new, interim
leadership team, the PCO would be comfortable increasing the length
of time between site visits in the interest of Estate stewardship
so long as the current team is in place.

A full-text copy of the PCO's Second Interim Report for Albuquerque
dated Nov. 10, 2017, is available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb17-50799-462.pdf

                 About Acadiana Management

Acadiana Management and several affiliates sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 17-50799) on
June 23, 2017.  The petitions were signed by August J. Rantz, IV,
president. Acadiana Management estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and debt at $50 million and $100 million.

Judge Robert Summerhays presides over the cases. Gold, Weems,
Bruser, Sues & Rundell, serves as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

On July 28, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.

Susan Goodman was appointed as patient care ombudsman.


ACADIANA MANAGEMENT: PCO Files 2nd Interim Report for Edmond/Mercy
------------------------------------------------------------------
Susan N. Goodman, the patient care ombudsman for Acadiana
Management Group, LLC, submits her second interim report detailing
remote monitoring, site visit observations, and analyses of the
Debtor's operations in Edmond and Mercy/OKC.

The PCO did not observe patient care decline or compromise at
either the Edmond or Mercy facilities that share one, 37-bed LTAC
license in the greater Oklahoma City metropolitan area. Continued
environmental services staff breaches in infection control
precautions were directly observed by PCO at Mercy. Moreover, at
least one nurse confirmed that none of her patient rooms were
cleaned on the date of PCO's visit. Because the PCO reported on
these concerns in the First Report, the PCO introduced herself to
the hospital-based EVS manager and directly relayed these continued
concerns.

The PCO asked to review the environmental surface testing specific
to the AMG rooms and was told that such information was not
available. Because the AMG Infection Preventionist for this
location has been actively engaged in providing specific
documentation and feedback to the hospital team without affecting a
behavior change, PCO recommended to both site and corporate
leadership that Mercy engage and pay for their own cleaning
verification testing given the persistent lapses in infection
control practices. Of note, the quality team member who works
closely with the IP resigned, leaving the IP to cover both roles.
Leadership indicated that additional assistance may be available
from the registered dietician who has extensive facility
experience.

Unfortunately, the day after PCO's visit, leadership announced the
closure of the Edmond facility, reporting to the PCO that wind down
will occur naturally as the existing nine patients meet discharge
criteria. Because this closure was surprising, the PCO expects some
reverberation both in the remaining Oklahoma facilities, as well as
potentially in the Indiana market since the Ball and Hancock
locations also share one LTAC license. Should staff departures
accelerate after the Edmond closure, the PCO will consider
shortening the visit cycle from the currently-planned sixty-day
interval.

Chasing the reverberations of the Edmond closure feels a bit like
engaging in a game of Whac-A-Mole. Because the census at Edmond was
similar to that at other locations, relative to total bed
availability, the PCO expects staff departures at other locations
if a clear bankruptcy exit strategy is not forthcoming,
particularly given staff’s desire to have assured income during
the holiday season. The PCO will engage remotely in an attempt to
appropriately prioritize follow-up site visits accordingly.

A full-text copy of the PCO's Second Interim Report for Edmond and
Mercy/OKC dated Nov. 10, 2017, is available at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/lawb17-50799-461.pdf

              About Acadiana Management

Acadiana Management and several affiliates sought Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. La. Lead Case No. 17-50799) on
June 23, 2017.  The petitions were signed by August J. Rantz, IV,
president.  Acadiana Management estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and debt at $50 million and $100 million.

Judge Robert Summerhays presides over the cases.  Gold, Weems,
Bruser, Sues & Rundell, serves as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

On July 28, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.

Susan Goodman was appointed as patient care ombudsman.


ALEVO USA: Seeks March 16 Plan Exclusivity Period Extension
-----------------------------------------------------------
Alevo USA, Inc. and Alevo Manufacturing, Inc. request the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina to
extend, for a period of three months, the deadline for filing a
plan of reorganization and disclosure statement, and their
exclusive periods for filing a plan and obtaining acceptances of
such plan, through and including March 16, 2018 and May 15, 2018,
respectively.

The Debtors relate that they are seeking Court approval to hire a
liquidator to sell their assets, but the Debtors believe that there
is the possibility that events affecting the Debtors' Swiss Parent
Companies could provide an opportunity for a more advantageous sale
that might provide funding for their plans of reorganization.

Therefore, the Debtors desire to protect their rights under 11
U.S.C. section 1121(d) pending further developments in this case
and believe that on or before March 16, 2018, they will be prepared
to either file a plan or take other appropriate action with
approval of the Court.

As such, given the current status of the Debtors' bankruptcy cases,
the Debtors assert that it is premature for each of the Debtors to
file a plan and disclosure statement prior to December 16, 2017.
Accordingly, sufficient cause exists to justify the Debtors'
request to extend the section 1121(d) exclusive periods in each of
their cases for a period of three months.

                       About Alevo USA Inc.

Concord-based battery manufacturers Alevo USA, Inc. and Alevo
Manufacturing, Inc. sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case Nos. 17-50876 and 17-50877)
on August 18, 2017.  Peter Heintzelman, its president, signed the
petitions.

At the time of the filing, Alevo USA disclosed that it had
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
$10 million to $50 million.  Alevo Manufacturing estimated assets
and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

Judge Catharine R. Aron presides over the cases.  Nelson Mullins
Riley & Scarborough, LLP represents the Debtors as bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtors hired BDO USA, LLP as their accountant.  The
Debtors employed CohnReznick Capital Markets Securities, LLC to as
investment banker.

An official committee of unsecured creditors was appointed on
September 1, 2017.  The committee hired Northen Blue LLP as its
legal counsel.


ALTON BEAN: Hires Honey Law Firm as Counsel
-------------------------------------------
Alton Bean Trucking, Inc. filed an amended application seeking
permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District
of Arkansas to employ Honey Law Firm, P.A. and its attorneys, Marc
Honey and Wm. Marshall Hubbard as counsel.

Services to be rendered by the Honey Law are:

     (a) advise and consult with the Debtor concerning questions
arising in the conduct of the administration of the estate and
concerning the Debtor's rights and remedies with regard to the
estate's assets and claims of secured, priority and unsecured
creditors and other parties in interest;

     (b) appear for; prosecute, defend, and represent the Debtor's
interest in adversary proceedings and/or contested matters arising
in or related to this case;

     (c) investigate and prosecute preference and other actions
arising under the Debtor's avoiding powers;

     (d) assist in the preparation of pleadings, motions, notices
and orders as are required for the orderly administration of this
estate; and consult with and advise the Debtor in connection with
the operation of or termination of the operation of the business of
the Debtor;

     (e) assist in the preparation of a Plan of Reorganization and
to present the Plan to the Bankruptcy Court for approval and
confirmation; and

     (f) undertake all other necessary and appropriate legal
representation of the Debtor in this proceeding.

Marc Honey, Esq. attests that the law firm and its members and
associates do not hold or represent any interest adverse to that of
the debtor or the Debtor's estate and that said law firm is a
disinterested person within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14).

Honey Law Firm, P.A. charges the Debtor its normal hourly billing
rates and its attorneys, Marc Honey and Wm. Marshall Hubbard at the
time of this application are $350.00 and $250.00 per hour,
respectively.

The Counsel can be reached through:

     Marc Honey, Esq.
     HONEY LAW FIRM, P.A.
     P.O. Box 1254
     1311 Central Avenue
     Hot Springs, AR 71902
     Tel: (501) 321-1007
     Fax: (501) 321-1255
     E-mail: mhoney@honeylawfirm.com

                     About Alton Bean Trucking

Headquartered in Amity, Arkansas, Alton Bean Trucking, Inc., was
founded in 1989.  It is engaged in the business of providing
trucking transportation services.

Alton Bean Trucking filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 17-72352) on Sept. 20, 2017, estimating
its assets and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million
each.  The petition was signed by Gary A. Bean, II, its president.

Judge Ben T. Barry presides over the case.

Marc Honey, Esq., at Honey Law Firm, P.A., serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.


AMG INTERNATIONAL: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Moved to Jan. 30
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. John K. Sherwood of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey has entered an Order extending the Exclusive
Periods within which AMG International, Inc., may file a Plan of
Reorganization and to solicit affirmative votes from impaired
classes of claims or interests, to January 30, 2018 and March 31,
2018, respectively.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor sought for exclusivity extension, asserting that it requires
additional time to evaluate restructuring alternatives. In
evaluating the operations and the impacts of the Chapter 11 filing,
the Debtor said that it is still considering whether some form of
reorganization is possible.

The Debtor said that its case is not large.  However, as of the
petition date, the Debtor had warehouses leased in five different
states.  The Debtor purchased product from overseas and distributes
domestically and internationally.

The Debtor recently commenced an adversary proceeding against a
supplier in possession of molds used to manufacture product.  The
Court recently granted the Debtor's request for injunctive relief
pertaining to turnover of property of the estate.

AMG also related that during the early stage of this case, the
Debtor and its representatives have endeavored to cooperate with
representatives of the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
and France Sport.  The Debtor and its representatives have provided
variance reports, are now current on filing monthly operating
reports, and have provided other information relating to operations
and financial dealings.  The Debtor has provided counsel for the
Committee with information and has cooperated, and will continue to
cooperate, in an effort to avoid costly discovery.

The Debtor's counsel has participated on several calls with counsel
for the Committee in order to answer questions pertaining to the
Debtor, its operations and potential restructuring alternatives.

According to the Debtor, the initial 90 days of this case have been
marked with progress. Specifically, the Debtor has cooperated with
the Committee in responding to information requests without the
need for costly and time consuming formal discovery.  The Debtor
has closed two warehouses in an effort to streamline operations.

In addition, the Debtor has recently commenced an adversary
proceeding and was successful in obtaining injunctive relief
pertaining to turnover of property of the estate. Finally, the
Debtor has enjoyed the use of cash collateral throughout the case
on an uncontested basis.

                      About AMG International

AMG International, Inc., dba Freeman-CMA and dba Freeman Products
Worldwide, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.N.J. Case No.
17-25816) on Aug. 3, 2017.  The petition was signed by
Jean-Francois Lefebvre, president.  At the time of filing, the
Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets and $1 million
to $10 million in liabilities. The case is assigned to Judge Hon.
John K. Sherwood.  Gibbons, PC and SEESE, P.A., serve as counsel to
the Debtor.

Freeman-CMA -- http://www.freeman-cma.com/-- is a designer,
manufacturer, marketer and distributor of award and recognition
products including trophy components, plastic and metal figures,
resin awards, plastic and metal engraving stock, ribbons and
medals, plaques, clocks, pen sets and executive gift items.  The
Company distributes one of the largest product lines in the awards
and recognition industry throughout both the United States and
Canada, as well as internationally.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of AMG International,
Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey to retain Jeffrey A. Cooper, Esq. at
Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC as counsel to the Committee, nunc
pro tunc to August 21, 2017.


APOLLO ENSOSURGERY: PTV Sciences Has 24% Equity Stake
-----------------------------------------------------
In a Schedule 13D/A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, these reporting persons disclosed beneficial ownership
of shares of common stock of Apollo Endosurgery as of Nov. 30,
2017:

                                     Beneficial   Percentage
Reporting Person                    Ownership     of Class
----------------                    ----------   ----------
PTV Sciences II, L.P.                4,152,463       24.0%
PTV IV, L.P.                         4,152,463       24.0%
PTV Special Opportunities I, L.P.    4,152,463       24.0%
PTV Evergreen Fund, L.P.                     0        0.0%
Pinto Technology Ventures GP II, L.P.4,152,463       24.0%
PTV GP IV, L.P.                      4,152,463       24.0%
PTV GP SO I, L.P.                    4,152,463       24.0%
PTV GP Evergreen, L.P.                       0        0.0%
Pinto TV GP Company LLC              4,152,463       24.0%
PTV GP Management IV                 4,152,463       24.0%
Matthew S. Crawford                  4,202,140       24.3%
Rick D. Anderson                     4,202,140       24.3%

The percentages are calculated based upon an estimated 17,290,347
shares of the Issuer's common stock outstanding as of Oct. 20,
2017, as reported by the Issuer in the Form 10-Q filed with the SEC
on Oct. 26, 2017.

On Nov. 15, 2017, PTV EG distributed 1,266,909 shares of Common
Stock in kind, without consideration, to its partners, in
connection with which PTV GP EG received 12,669 shares of Common
Stock.  Immediately upon receipt of those shares, PTV EG
distributed all 12,669 shares of Common Stock in kind, without
consideration, to its partners, in connection with which each of
Crawford and Anderson received 4,223 shares of Common Stock.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                    https://is.gd/LUbLSX

                   About Apollo Endosurgery

Headquartered in Austin, Texas, Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. --
http://www.apolloendo.com/-- is a medical device company focused
on less invasive therapies for the treatment of obesity, a
condition facing over 600 million people globally, as well as other
gastrointestinal disorders.  Apollo's device based therapies are an
alternative to invasive surgical procedures, thus lowering
complication rates and reducing total healthcare costs.  Apollo's
products are offered in over 80 countries today.  Apollo's common
stock is traded on NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol "APEN".

Apollo Endosurgery reported a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $41.16 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$36.38 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of Sept. 30,
2017, Apollo Endosurgery had $114 million in total assets, $57.16
million in total liabilities and $56.83 million in total
stockholders' equity.

According to the Company's quarterly report for the period ended
Sept. 30, 2017, "The Company has experienced operating losses since
inception and occasional debt covenant violations and has an
accumulated deficit of $169,706 as of September 30, 2017.  To date,
the Company has funded its operating losses and acquisitions
through equity offerings and the issuance of debt instruments.  The
Company's ability to fund future operations will depend upon its
level of future operating cash flow and its ability to access
additional funding through either equity offerings, issuances of
debt instruments or both."


AUTO MASTERS: Committee Taps Gullett Sanford as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
The official committee of unsecured creditors of Auto Masters, LLC
seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle
District of Tennessee to hire Gullett, Sanford, Robinson & Martin,
PLLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will assist the committee in its consultations with Auto
Masters and its affiliates; negotiate with creditors; investigate
the Debtors' conduct; assist in the review and negotiation of any
bankruptcy plan; and provide other legal services related to the
Debtors' Chapter 11 cases.

The firm's hourly rates range from $300 to $550 for members, and
from $150 to $275 for associates.  Paralegals will charge $125 per
hour.

Gullett Sanford is a "disinterested person" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Thomas H. Forrester, Esq.
     G. Rhea Bucy, Esq.
     Gullett, Sanford, Robinson & Martin, PLLC
     150 Third Avenue, South, Suite 1700
     Nashville, TN 37201
     Phone: (615) 244-4994
     Fax: (615) 256-6339
     Email: tforrester@gsrm.com
     Email: rbucy@gsrm.com
     Email: lcatabay@gsrm.com

                        About Auto Masters

Auto Masters, LLC -- https://driveautomasters.com/ -- is a "Buy
Here Pay Here" used car dealer in Nashville that offers financing
to customers for the cars they sell.  The company has dealership
locations in Nashville, Smyrna, Franklin, Hermitage, Madison,
Clarksville, West Nashville and Thompson Lane (Nashville).

On Oct. 17, 2017, Auto Masters, LLC, and 14 affiliates sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-07036).  Auto
Masters estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and $50
million to $100 million in debt.

The Hon. Charles M Walker is the case judge.  Dunham Hildebrand,
PLLC is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

On November 15, 2017, the U.S. trustee for Region 8 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


AVAYA INC: Verizon Objects to Cure in Contracts Under Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Verizon Communications filed with
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court an objection to cure amounts in the
executory contracts and unexpired leases to be assumed by Avaya
Inc., pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. The objection
asserts, "Although Verizon does not generally oppose assumption, it
objects to such assumption to the extent that the proposed cure
fails to satisfy all existing defaults in accordance with 11 U.S.C.
section 365(b). A cure under 11 U.S.C. section 365 means that all
unpaid amounts due under the agreement have been paid….In
addition, as the cases proceed and Verizon Business continues to
provide postpetition services to the Debtors' estates, additional
amounts become due under the Agreement. Any post-petition amounts
due must also be paid to Verizon Business in order to cure the
existing default. Accordingly, unless and until the Debtors cure
the pre-petition balances owed to Verizon Business in full and pay
any post-petition amounts which may be due, the Debtors cannot
assume the Agreement."

                       About Avaya Inc.

Avaya Inc. is a multinational company that provides communications
products and services, including, telephone communications,
internet telephony, wireless data communications, real-time video
collaboration, contact centers, and customer relationship software
to companies of various sizes.

The Avaya Enterprise serves over 200,000 customers, consisting of
multinational enterprises, small- and medium-sized businesses, and
911 services as well as government organizations operating in a
diverse range of industries.  It has approximately 9,700 employees
worldwide as of Dec. 31, 2016.

Avaya Inc. and 17 of its affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-10089)
on Jan. 19, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Eric S. Koza, CFA,
chief restructuring officer.

Judge Stuart M. Bernstein presides over the cases.

The Debtors have hired Kirkland & Ellis LLP as legal counsel;
Centerview Partners LLC as investment banker; Zolfo Cooper LLC as
restructuring advisor; PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor; KPMG
LLP as tax and accountancy advisor; and The Siegfried Group, LLP,
as financial services consultant.  Prime Clerk LLC is their claims
and noticing agent.

On Jan. 31, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Morrison & Foerster is
the creditors committee's counsel.

On April 13, 2017, the Debtors filed their joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP and Rothschild, Inc., serve as
advisors to an ad hoc group -- Ad Hoc Crossholder Group --
comprised of holders of the Company's (i) 33.98% of the $3.235
billion total amount outstanding under loans issued pursuant to a
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, amended and restated
as of December 12, 2012 (the "Prepetition Cash Flow Term Loans");
(ii) 28.38% of the $1.009 billion total principal amount
outstanding under notes issued pursuant to an indenture for the
7.00% Senior Secured Notes Due 2019 (the "7.00% First Lien Notes");
(iii) 12.82% of the $290 million total principal amount outstanding
under notes issued pursuant to an indenture for 9.00% Senior
Secured Notes Due 2019 (the "9.00% First Lien Notes"); (iv) 83.70%
of the $1.384 billion total amount outstanding under notes issued
pursuant to an indenture for 10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2021
(the "Second Lien Notes"); and (v) 24% of the $725 million
outstanding under loans issued under the Debtors'
debtor-in-possession financing (the "DIP Facility") pursuant to a
Superpriority Secured Debtor-In-Possession Credit Agreement, dated
as of Jan. 24, 2017.


AVAYA INC: Wants Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Jan. 1
---------------------------------------------------------------
Avaya Holdings and its affiliates ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Southern District of New York to extend the Debtors' exclusive
right to file a Chapter 11 plan by approximately 32 days through
and including Jan. 1, 2018, and to solicit votes thereon by
approximately 30 days through and including March 2, 2018.

A hearing to consider the Debtors' request is scheduled for Dec.
12, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time).  Objections to
the Debtors' request must be filed by Dec. 5, 2017, at 4:00 p.m.
(prevailing Eastern Time).

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 19, 2017, the
Court extended the exclusive periods during which only te Debtors
could file and solicit acceptances of a Chapter 11 Plan through and
including Nov. 30, 2017, and Jan. 31, 2018, respectively.

The Debtors have made significant progress towards achieving their
restructuring goals in the eleven months of these
multibillion-dollar Chapter 11 cases.  Since their last exclusivity
extension was granted on Sept. 11, 2017, the Debtors have:

     -- continued to make significant progress in the
        reconciliation of their claims pool through their ongoing
        reconciliation of claims filed against these Chapter 11
        estates by filing six separate omnibus claims objections
        (covering 1200 of 3500 total claims);

     -- initiated a claims objection proceeding that is currently
        pending before the Court against litigation counterparty
        SAE Power Incorporated and SAE Power Company, which
        included a claims estimation hearing with respect to the
        administrative expense and general unsecured claims of
        SAE;

     -- participated in a successful mediation before U.S.
        Bankruptcy Judge Cecelia G. Morris, as mediator, with the
        Creditors' Committee, Ad Hoc First Lien Group, Ad Hoc
        Crossover Group, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and
        the Second Lien Notes Trustee as mediation parties, which
        concluded in a global plan settlement resolving the Ad Hoc

        Crossover Group's stated plan objections;

     -- successfully negotiated and filed their Second Amended
        Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Avaya Inc. and
        Its Debtor Affiliates with the support of the Mediation
        Parties;

     -- successfully resolved the treatment of the Debtors'
        qualified pension liabilities with PBGC via a joint
        stipulation and settlement and filed the Debtors' motion
        for entry of an order (i) approving stipulation of
        settlement with Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation;

     -- obtained court approval with respect to their Disclosure
        Statement supplement for the Second Amended Joint Chapter
        11 Plan of Reorganization of Avaya Inc. and its Debtor
        Affiliates and Crossover Plan Support Agreement locking up

        the support of approximately 73% of Second Lien Debt for
        the Second Amended Plan;

     -- commenced solicitation on their Second Amended Plan in
        accordance with the court order (i) approving the Debtors'

        continued solicitation of the Second Amended Plan and the
        adequacy of the supplemental Disclosure in connection
        therewith, (ii) modifying certain deadlines and procedures

        in connection with plan confirmation and shortening notice

        with respect thereto, (iii) approving the form of ballot
        in connection therewith, and (iv) granting related Relief;

        and

     -- filed their Plan Supplement for the Debtors' Second
        Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter
        11 of the Bankruptcy Code.

This progress has been achieved against the backdrop of what all
parties have recognized are large, complex Chapter 11 cases
involving billions of dollars of funded debt and legacy
liabilities, global operations, thousands of employees and
retirees, and a diverse set of stakeholder constituencies.

The brief exclusivity extension requested will permit the Debtors
to focus on confirming their Second Amended Plan and emerging from
these chapter 11 cases without substantial disruption or delay that
would result if parties were permitted to file competing plans at
this critical juncture.  Continued exclusivity will ensure the
Debtors have sufficient time to confirm and consummate their Second
Amended Plan -- which enjoys the support of every major creditor
constituency and avoids costly and uncertain litigation on complex
confirmation issues.

The Debtors say that sufficient cause exists pursuant to Section
1121(d) of the Bankruptcy Code to extend the Exclusivity Periods as
provided for at least these five reasons:

     -- first, the Debtors' Chapter 11 cases are large and
        complex.  As previously discussed, these Chapter 11 cases
        involve 18 Debtor entities, which have over 2,800
        employees, two U.S. pension plans, and approximately $6
        billion in funded debt.  Complicating matters, the
        Debtors' business operations rely in part on their
        international footprint, which extends to over 150 non-
        Debtor affiliates who operate in countries across the
        globe.  The Debtors' challenges are further compounded by
        a complex corporate and capital structure as well as a
        transforming telecommunications industry marked by fierce
        market competition;

     -- second, the Debtors have made good faith progress towards
        exiting Chapter 11.  The Debtors have used their previous
        extensions of the Exclusivity Periods constructively by
        engaging in ongoing, substantive discussions with their
        key stakeholder groups and/or their advisors around the
        terms of their ultimate reorganization.  In fact, since
        the previous extension, the Mediation Parties alongside
        their respective advisors, participated in successful
        mediation that resulted in the Global Resolution, the
        terms of which are set forth in the Debtors’ Second
        Amended Plan;

     -- third, an Extension of the Exclusivity Periods will not
        prejudice creditors.  The Debtors are requesting an
        extension of the Exclusivity Periods in order to confirm
        and consummate their Second Amended Plan and have these
        Chapter 11 cases go effective without the distraction from

        competing plans.  In particular, the Court recently
        approved the Debtors' Disclosure Statement Supplement and
        entry into the Crossover PSA.  Notably, the Crossover PSA,

        along with the First Lien Plan Support Agreement, provides

        the Debtors with the unfettered ability to consider
        alternative restructuring transactions and, if
        appropriate, terminate those agreements in a manner
        consistent with their fiduciary duties.  The Debtors
        believe that continued exclusivity will therefore enhance
        (not hinder) the Debtors' ongoing efforts to complete
        their restructuring on terms that are in the best interest

        of these Chapter 11 estates;

     -- fourth, the Debtors are paying their bills as they come
        due.  Since the Petition Date, the Debtors have paid their

        vendors and third party partners in the ordinary course of

        business or as otherwise provided by Court order. There
        are certain vendors, however, that filed motions
        requesting payment of administrative expenses.  The
        Debtors initiated an estimation hearing in connection with

        one of these motions and are evaluating all of these
        motions and working with these vendors to resolve their
        claims; ultimately, all claims will be resolved through
        the Debtors' ongoing claims reconciliation process.

     -- fifth, the Debtors have demonstrated reasonable prospects
        for filing a viable plan.  Following the Court's approval
        of their Disclosure Statement supplement and continued
        solicitation order, the Debtors commenced solicitation on
        the Second Amended Plan.  The Debtors respectfully submit
        that this fact alone, coupled with the Global Resolution,
        establishes that the Debtors have a 'reasonable prospect'
        for prosecuting a confirmable plan and supports the
        Debtors' requested exclusivity extension.

A copy of the Debtors' request is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-10089-1574.pdf

                         About Avaya Inc.

Avaya Inc. is a multinational company that provides communications
products and services, including, telephone communications,
internet telephony, wireless data communications, real-time video
collaboration, contact centers, and customer relationship software
to companies of various sizes.

The Avaya Enterprise serves over 200,000 customers, consisting of
multinational enterprises, small- and medium-sized businesses, and
911 services as well as government organizations operating in a
diverse range of industries.  It has approximately 9,700 employees
worldwide as of Dec. 31, 2016.

Avaya Inc. and 17 of its affiliates sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 17-10089)
on Jan. 19, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Eric S. Koza, CFA,
chief restructuring officer.

Judge Stuart M. Bernstein presides over the cases.

The Debtors have hired Kirkland & Ellis LLP as legal counsel;
Centerview Partners LLC as investment banker; Zolfo Cooper LLC as
restructuring advisor; PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as auditor; KPMG
LLP as tax and accountancy advisor; and The Siegfried Group, LLP,
as financial services consultant.  Prime Clerk LLC is their claims
and noticing agent.

On Jan. 31, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Morrison & Foerster is
the creditors committee's counsel.

On April 13, 2017, the Debtors filed their joint Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization.

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP and Rothschild, Inc., serve as
advisors to an ad hoc group -- Ad Hoc Crossholder Group --
comprised of holders of the Company's (i) 33.98% of the $3.235
billion total amount outstanding under loans issued pursuant to a
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, amended and restated
as of December 12, 2012 (the "Prepetition Cash Flow Term Loans");
(ii) 28.38% of the $1.009 billion total principal amount
outstanding under notes issued pursuant to an indenture for the
7.00% Senior Secured Notes Due 2019 (the "7.00% First Lien Notes");
(iii) 12.82% of the $290 million total principal amount outstanding
under notes issued pursuant to an indenture for 9.00% Senior
Secured Notes Due 2019 (the "9.00% First Lien Notes"); (iv) 83.70%
of the $1.384 billion total amount outstanding under notes issued
pursuant to an indenture for 10.5% Senior Secured Notes Due 2021
(the "Second Lien Notes"); and (v) 24% of the $725 million
outstanding under loans issued under the Debtors'
debtor-in-possession financing (the "DIP Facility") pursuant to a
Superpriority Secured Debtor-In-Possession Credit Agreement, dated
as of Jan. 24, 2017.


B & B METALS: January 16 Hearing on Amended Disclosure Statement
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas L. Perkins of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of Illinois will conduct a hearing on January 16,
2018 at 10:00 a.m., to consider final approval of B & B Metals,
Inc.'s amended disclosure statement describing the Debtor's Amended
Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization filed by the Debtor on November
09, 2017.

January 6, 2018 will be the last day for filing and serving written
objections to the Amended Disclosure Statement.

                      About B & B Metals

B & B Metals, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Ill.
Case No. 17-80859) on June 9, 2017.  The petition was signed by
Larry Beam, President.  The Debtor estimated assets of less than
$100,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The Debtor tapped
Justin Raver, Esq., at Barash & Everett, LLC, as counsel.

Since 2012, the Debtor has been in the business of scrapping
semi-trailers, selling various parts including the tires, rims, and
suspension equipment as well as refrigeration units and then
scrapping the remaining metals and selling to regional scrap
yards.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of B & B Metals, Inc. as of July
26, according to a court docket.


BCP RENAISSANCE: Fitch Rates $1.25BB Sr. Secured Term Loans 'BB-'
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned an instrument default rating of 'BB-'
and a Recovery Rating (RR) of 'RR3' to BCP Renaissance Parent LLC's
(BCP) $1.25 billion senior secured term loans. The Rating Outlook
is Stable.

The instrument default rating of 'BB-' does not incorporate
recovery prospects given a default, consistent with Fitch's Rating
Criteria for Global Infrastructure and Project Finance. Fitch has
issued a separate RR, which is not typically assigned for project
finance transactions, to address a specific need for investors in
the term-loan market. The 'RR3' is derived from BCP's valuation as
a going concern using a bespoke approach, which is primarily used
for entities rated 'B+' and below but can be applied to entities
rated in the 'BB' category under certain circumstances.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Summary: BCP acquired a minority equity interest in the Rover
pipeline project, which consists of a greenfield 713-mile
interstate pipeline designed to transport 3.25 billion cubic feet
per day (bcfd) of natural gas. Rover benefits from contractual
revenues anchored by long-term, fixed-price agreements but remains
exposed to potential merchant risk for remarketed capacity in the
event of a hypothetical shipper bankruptcy. Rover's strong
competitive position, linking natural gas production in the
Marcellus and Utica shale gas regions with major markets, minimizes
volumetric risks. However, basis differentials and shipper credit
quality could erode if market conditions weaken due to oversupply
and/or slackening demand.

BCP's high level of leverage, initially 8.5x in the sponsor case,
is partially mitigated by a flexible repayment structure. The term
facility provides for rapid deleveraging in the base case with
strong prospects for refinancing the balloon maturity even if
revenues are reduced and interest rates rise. Debt service coverage
ratios (DSCRs) average 1.23x under the rating case during the tenor
of the term loans but average more than 2.0x in the
post-refinancing period.

The 'RR3' is based on a scenario that assumes a combination of
lower capacity prices and marketed volumes that cause Rover's
revenues to fall 60% below sponsor case levels, resulting in
approximately $90 million of annual distributable cash flow to BCP.
Fitch applied an EBITDA multiple of 8x to estimate an enterprise
value for BCP of approximately $700 million, which is then divided
by the principal of the term loans outstanding at default. The
results of the recovery analysis fall within the 51%-70% band of
recovery rates that correspond to the 'RR3' rating.

CONTRACTED REVENUES, WEAK COUNTERPARTIES

Revenue risk primarily reflects the sub-investment-grade credit
quality of the shipper counterparties, with revenues split almost
evenly between shippers rated at or above the 'BB' level and those
that are rated either below the 'BB' level or not rated by Fitch.
The pricing structure of the take-or-pay agreements provides
revenue stability so long as the shippers remain solvent. In the
event that a shipper is unable to meet its commitments, Rover would
be forced to remarket capacity at prevailing market rates, which
may demonstrate high volatility. The potential for a longer-term
reduction in demand and the prospect of competing pipeline
development could put downward pressure on the pricing of any
remarketed capacity.

FIRST MOVER, STRONG ECONOMICS

Fitch believes Rover should be able to remarket capacity based on
the fundamental economics of the Marcellus and Utica shale
production regions, particularly in the near to medium term when
Rover represents one of the only available transportation options
for the contracted shippers. Rover provides shippers with access to
multiple regions of steady industrial demand and gas storage
locations such that shipper netbacks would improve considerably
versus local markets. The competitive position of Rover should
support full utilization of the pipeline system going forward, even
if pricing is lower than originally contracted following any
potential shipper bankruptcy.

MITIGATED COMPLETION RISK

BCP is largely insulated from completion risks, which are
effectively transferred to Energy Transfer Partners, LP (ETP,
BBB-/Stable) under a joint venture agreement. BCP's equity funding
obligation is capped at a fixed amount with ETP bearing the
responsibility for cost overruns, and ETP has committed to pay
delay damages if Rover is not operational by a date certain. Delay
risks are further mitigated by the advanced stage of construction
and the 13-month scheduling buffer before the threshold dates that
would trigger capacity step-downs under the shipper agreements.

STABLE EXPECTED OPERATING PROFILE

Operation risk is generally low based on the favorable evaluation
of the independent engineer, the non-complex nature of the asset,
the use of conventional technology, and the operator's extensive
experience. Tempering the otherwise low-risk operating profile is
the greenfield nature of the pipeline system and the lack of risk
transfer from the Rover operating company to third parties.

HIGH LEVERAGE, REFINANCING RISK

BCP's debt structure includes initially high leverage, variable
interest rate risk, and refinancing risk. The term facility employs
a partially amortizing structure that triggers a balloon payment at
maturity, and BCP's ability to refinance will be dependent upon the
efficacy of a cash sweep. Financial metrics are generally robust
during the seven-year tenor of the term facility and BCP's project
life coverage ratio (PLCR) through Sept. 30, 2037 meets or exceeds
1.2x across various stress scenarios. The structural subordination
of BCP's indebtedness is low due to lack of distribution covenants
at the Rover operating company in conjunction with restrictions on
additional indebtedness and capital expenditure activity.

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

BCP's initially high leverage, 8.5x in the sponsor case and 9.3x in
the base case, could fall to 5.6x at maturity if base case
conditions are maintained. Fitch's rating case increases the
interest rate on the term facility, includes higher operating
costs, assumes the issuance of additional indebtedness, and reduces
revenues to reflect the high level of merchant risk following any
potential shipper bankruptcy. DSCRs average 1.23x under rating case
conditions during the tenor of the term facility but average more
than 2.0x in the post-refinancing period, reflecting the benefit of
the flexible repayment profile and the long-term value of Rover's
contracts. Leverage is high at 7.8x in 2024 but rapidly falls due
to the cash sweep post-refinancing, such that leverage would fall
to 5.2x in 2029.

PEER GROUP

Fitch has assigned investment-grade ratings to comparable pipeline
systems, such as Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC (BBB-/Stable)
and Ruby Pipeline LLC (BBB-/Stable). BCP's initial leverage exceeds
8.0x, which is considerably weaker than the 3.5x leverage exhibited
by higher rated peers that also generally have a stronger mix of
shipper counterparties. Additionally, debt at the peer pipelines is
directly at the operating level. Fitch recognizes the potential for
BCP to rapidly de-lever under the term facility, suggesting that
BCP has the capacity to improve the capital structure over time if
economic conditions are favorable and the shipper contracts remain
in force.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:

-- Increased exposure to merchant risk following a hypothetical
    shipper bankruptcy, such that Rover is forced to remarket
    capacity at lower-than-contracted pricing.
-- Adverse market conditions that interfere with BCP's ability to

    meet target amortization levels and/or refinance the balloon
    maturity in 2024, particularly if leverage exceeds 7.5x.
-- Additional indebtedness at Rover that is not offset by an
    increase in revenue, such that cash distributions to BCP fall
    below base case levels.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:

-- Financial performance that allows BCP to consistently meet
    targeted amortization and reduce leverage below 5.0x.
-- Improvement in the credit quality of the shipper
    counterparties to the 'BB' rating category, such that the
    proportion of contracted revenue exceeds 75% of total
    projected revenue.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

BCP Renaissance Parent LLC is a special purpose company created to
finance and acquire a minority equity interest in the Rover
pipeline project, which consists of a greenfield 713-mile
interstate pipeline designed to transport 3.25 bcfd of natural gas.
The pipeline is primarily situated in northern Ohio, extending from
the Vector Pipeline interconnection in southeastern Michigan to
Ohio's eastern border, with laterals reaching into West Virginia
and Pennsylvania. The project has contracted 98% of the pipeline's
capacity with nine natural gas producers/shippers under long-term
take-or-pay agreements with 15-20-year terms. ETP, which is
managing the development and construction of the pipeline, will
operate the completed project.

The $1.25 billion senior secured term loan financed the sponsor's
acquisition of a 32.435% ownership interest in the Rover pipeline
from ETP, the previous majority owner. The proceeds of the
financing funded the acquisition payment, the sponsor's share of
construction costs, interest during construction, and the debt
service reserve.

In its base case, Fitch applied a 10% reduction to spot revenues
and all revenues associated with speculative-grade shippers. The
reduction recognizes the potential for a shipper bankruptcy and is
approximately equivalent to the loss of all merchant revenues, or
the revenues associated with one of the speculative grade shippers
other than Ascent Utica. DSCRs average 1.78x during the tenor of
the term facility and 3.37x post-refinancing, as leverage declines
to 5.6x in 2024 with a PLCR of 1.61x. In 2024, Fitch assumes an
effective extension of the term facility and the cash sweep at an
all-in average interest rate of approximately 7.25%.

Fitch has also run breakeven analyses on key factors with the
following results:

-- O&M costs increasing by 300% reduces DSCRs below 1x;
-- Spot revenues and all revenues associated with speculative-
    grade shippers fall by 40%, resulting in breakeven DSCR
    coverages across the seven-year tenor of the term facility;
-- Revenues fall by 38% to reach a PLCR of 1.00x in 2024;
-- Loss of 92% of the capacity sold to Ascent Utica, Rover's
    largest counterparty by projected revenue, due to bankruptcy
    and sale of remarketed capacity at a deep discount.

The breakeven results illustrate that BCP remains resilient in
extreme cases where significant operational and commercial stresses
are applied.

Fitch assumes the following combination of stresses to develop its
rating case:

-- BCP is assumed to immediately exercise its option to issue an
    additional $50 million of term loans;
-- LIBOR is assumed to gradually increase from current rates
    before reaching a plateau of 4% in 2022. The increase in
    interest rates ranges from 100-150bps versus the sponsor's
    assumptions;
-- The refinancing rate is increased to 8% for the duration of
    the refinancing period;
-- An increase of 10% is applied to all operating expenses and
    maintenance capital expenditures;
-- A 15% reduction in spot revenues and all revenues associated
    with speculative-grade shippers.

DSCRs average 1.23x under rating case conditions during the tenor
of the term facility but average more than 2.0x in the
post-refinancing period, reflecting the benefit of the flexible
repayment profile and the long-term value of the shipper contracts.
Despite the combination of financial and operating stresses with
revenue reductions, BCP's PLCR remains at 1.16x in 2024. Leverage
is high at 7.8x in 2024 but rapidly falls due to the cash sweep,
which reduces leverage to 5.2x in 2029.

Fitch views the rating case as a severe scenario in which a
near-term market correction effectively eliminates spot revenues
and drives the bankruptcy and irrevocable loss of one of Rover's
shippers. The market correction is assumed to persist throughout
the entire term of the contracts and is accompanied by a sharp
increase in interest rates that also persists indefinitely.
Notwithstanding these conditions, BCP issues additional
indebtedness in a high interest rate environment. Fitch views BCP's
financial performance under these conditions as consistent with the
'BB-' rating.

Recovery
Fitch's recovery analysis considers a combination of lower capacity
prices and marketed volumes that cause Rover's revenues to fall 60%
below sponsor case levels, resulting in approximately $90 million
of distributable cash flow to BCP. The debt service reserve would
be depleted such that default occurs at the term loans' maturity in
2024. The reduced level of cash flow is assumed to persist
indefinitely and represents BCP's fractional share of Rover's
EBITDA in a distressed market environment.

Fitch applied an EBITDA multiple of 8.0x, which is above the 6.3x
median enterprise valuation multiple for the energy sector as
reported in Fitch's publication "Energy, Power and Commodities
Bankruptcy Enterprise Value and Creditor Recoveries" dated January
2017. The elevated multiple for BCP recognizes that natural gas
pipeline assets typically represent critical energy infrastructure
that is difficult to replicate and generally retains significant
underlying operational value even in times of financial distress.

Reorganization multiples can vary widely based upon the commodity
price environment on emergence as well as company-specific factors
that lead to restructuring, including full-cycle cost positions,
untenable capital structures, or debt-funded M&A activity.
Bankruptcy and reorganization within the midstream energy sector,
and more specifically for interstate natural gas pipelines, tends
to be infrequent. As such, comparable multiple data is limited.

Fitch views the 8x EBITDA multiple as reasonable based on the
limited multiples observed in pipeline sector bankruptcies with
assets similar to that of Rover. SEMGroup, a midstream services
provider of energy transportation and storage services that filed
for bankruptcy in 2008, demonstrated an enterprise
value/post-emergence EBITDA multiple of 7.9x. More recently, the
Azure Midstream Partners, LP and Southcross Holdings, LP
bankruptcies implied estimated EBITDA multiples of 7.0x and 3.5x,
respectively.

Fitch applied the 8x EBITDA multiple to estimate an enterprise
value for BCP of approximately $700 million, which is then divided
by the principal of the term loans outstanding at default. The
results of the recovery analysis fall within the 51%-70% band of
recovery rates that correspond to the 'RR3' rating.

BCP Renaissance Parent L.L.C. was formed by Blackstone Energy
Partners II L.P. and Blackstone Capital Partners VII L.P. as the
vehicle to acquire and finance Blackstone's investment in Energy
Transfer Partners, L.P.'s Rover natural gas pipeline.


BEBE STORES: Stockholders Elected Five Directors to Board
---------------------------------------------------------
An annual meeting of shareholders for bebe stores inc. was held in
Los Angeles, California, on Nov. 29, 2017, at which the
shareholders elected Brett Brewer, Corrado Federico, Robert Galvin,
Seth Johnson and Manny Mashouf as directors.

The shareholders also approved: (a) the compensation of the
Company's named executive officers; (b) the three year frequency
of future advisory votes on executive compensation; and (c) an
amendment to the Amended and Restated Bylaws to reduce the minimum
size of the Board of Directors from five members to three members
and the maximum size from nine members to five members, with the
final decision whether to proceed with the filing of the amendment
to be determined by the Board of Directors, in its discretion,
following stockholder approval, but not later than Dec. 15, 2018.

                    About bebe stores inc.

Based in Brisbane, California, bebe stores inc. (NASDAQ: BEBE) --
http://www.bebe.com/-- is a women's retail clothier established in
1976.  The brand develops and produces a line of women's apparel
and accessories, which it markets under the Bebe, BebeSport, and
Bebe Outlet names.

Manny Mashouf founded bebe stores, inc. and has served as chairman
of the Board since the Company's incorporation in 1976.  Mr.
Mashouf became the chief executive officer starting February 2016.
He previously served as the Company's CEO from 1976 to February
2004 and again from January 2009 to January 2013.  Mr. Mashouf is
the uncle of Hamid Mashouf, the Company's chief information
officer.  The Company operated brick-and-mortar stores in the
United States, Puerto Rico and Canada.  The Company had 142 retail
stores before ending all retail operations in the U.S. by May 27,
2017.  As of July 1, 2017, the Company had no remaining stores and
had fully impaired, all of its remaining long-lived assets at its
corporate offices and distribution center because of the shut-down
of its operations.

bebe stores reported a net loss of $138.96 million on $0 of net
sales for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2017, compared to a net
loss of $27.48 million on $0 of net sales for the fiscal year ended
July 2, 2016.  As of Sept. 30, 2017, bebe stores had $30.87 million
in total assets, $39.21 million in total liabilities and a total
shareholders' deficit of $8.34 million.

The report from the Company's independent registered public
accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP, in San Francisco,
California, for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, includes an
explanatory paragraph stating that the Company has incurred
recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from
operations and expects significant uncertainty in generating
sufficient cash to meet its obligations and sustain its operations,
which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern.


BERNSOHN & FETNER: Taps Mayerson as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Bernsohn & Fetner LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of New York to hire Mayerson and
Hartheimer PLLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; give advice regarding
any potential sale of its assets; and assist in the preparation of
a bankruptcy plan.

The firm charges $600 per hour for the services of its members,
$350 per hour for other attorneys and $100 per hour for paralegals.
Mayerson received $35,000 from the Debtor as retainer.

David Hartheimer, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that the firm's
attorneys are "disinterested persons" as defined in section 101(14)
of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mayerson can be reached through:

     David H. Hartheimer, Esq.
     Sandra E. Mayerson, Esq.
     845 Third Avenue, 11th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Phone: (646) 778-4380
     Email: david@mhlaw-ny.com
     Email: sandra@mhlaw-ny.com

                    About Bernsohn & Fetner LLC

Bernsohn & Fetner, LLC -- http://www.bfbuilding.com/-- is a
full-service construction management and general contracting firm
dedicated to residential, corporate, and retail construction.
Bernsohn also offers maintenance service for major New York
buildings.  The Company was founded in 2003 by Steven Fetner and
Randall Bernsohn.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-23707) on November 7, 2017.
Steven Fetner, managing member, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $1.735 million in
assets and $920,000 in liabilities.  The Debtor had no secured
debt.

Judge Robert D. Drain presides over the case.


BIG TIME HOLDINGS: Ch. 11 Trustee Hires Rosenberg Musso as Attorney
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert J. Musso, Esq., the Chapter 11 Operating Trustee of the
estate of Big Time Holdings, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to employ
Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, LLP, as his attorneys to assist him in
the administration of the estate.

The primary asset is real property located at 200-15 Linden Blvd,
Queens, New York. The property is occupied by a commercial tenant
on the first floor and upon information and belief the second floor
is occupied by Andrew Jones, Esq., the husband of Monique Jones the
sole member of the Debtor.

Counsel will need to insure rent is being paid as well as
collection of any arrears that may be due to the estate. Counsel
will assist and represent the Trustee in the most efficient manner
to administer the real property

Bruce Weiner, Esq. attests that he and his firm are "disinterested"
as such term is defined by Section
101(14) of the Code with respect to the Debtor and the estate.

The hourly rate for partners is $650.00 and the hourly rate for
associates is $500.00. These rates are comparable to the billing
rates of other experienced bankruptcy attorneys for the kind of
services to be rendered.

The Attorney can be reached through:

     Bruce Weiner, Esq.
     Rosenberg, Musso & Weiner, LLP
     26 Court Street, Suite 2211
     Brooklyn, NY 11242
     Phone: 718-855-6840
     Toll Free: 800-297-6840
     Fax: 718-625-1966

             About Big Time Holdings, LLC

Big Time Holdings, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-40960), on March 1, 2017. The petition was
signed by Andrew Jones, President. At the time of filing, the
Debtor had both assets and liabilities estimated to be between
$100,000 to $500,000. The case is assigned to Judge Nancy Hershey
Lord. The Debtor is represented by David Y. Wolnerman, Esq. at
White & Wolnerman PLLC.


BILLNAT CORP: Ombudsman Makes Recommendations on IP Sale
--------------------------------------------------------
Luis Salazar, the duly-appointed Consumer Privacy Ombudsman of the
estate of BillNat Corporation, submits a report to the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan concerning
the sale of certain intellectual property.

On October 13, 2017, BillNat filed a Sale Motion, which, among
other things, sought approval of the Asset Purchase Agreement
between the Debtor and Woodward Detroit CVS, L.L.C., concerning the
sale of certain intellectual property including customer files and
related data, as well as contact information and email addresses,
and other purchasing history and related information.

The Ombudsman finds that BillNat owns and operates convenient
stores and pharmacies under the corporate name Sav-On Drugs.
BillNat agreed that the Intellectual Property may contain
"Personally Identifiable Information" or "PII" and "Protected
Health Information" or "PHI." BillNat utilizes Health Business
Systems, Inc. to maintain the PHI. Health Business Systems reported
that there are 547,189 patient files in use by Sav-On Drugs as of
October 31, 2017.

The Ombudsman also finds that BillNat gathered Customer PII and PHI
solely through its Sav-On Drugs locations. BillNat's website also
provided information for customers to join the Sav-On Rewards Club,
but were instructed to complete the form and submit same at a store
location. In any event, the same Privacy Policy was provided or
made available to all customers. The Customer PII and PHI will be
used to reach out to consumers and advise them of the purchase. In
addition, The Ombudsman determines that CVS’ Privacy Policy is at
least as stringent as the Sav-On Privacy Policy.

Accordingly, the Ombudsman recommends that the Court may approve
the proposed sale and transfer of the Customer PII and PHI subject
to the following conditions to be set forth in any sale order:

      (a) Customer PII may be sold and transferred, provided that
BillNat demonstrates that each sale transfer is to a Qualified
Buyer, which means an entity that: (a) concentrates its business in
the pharmacy health care provider industry; and (b) agrees to treat
the Customer PII and PHI under privacy standards at least as
stringent as those of the Debtor;

      (b) PHI may be sold and transferred, provided that BillNat
demonstrates that each sale transfer is to a Covered Entity, which
is defined under the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 as health plans, health care providers,
and health care clearinghouses. BillNat is considered a health care
provider and, therefore, a Covered Entity;

      (c) The Covered Entity must comply with their respective
obligations with respect to the transfer of confidential patient
information to ensure that any such transfer is in compliance with
applicable privacy law and regulation, including but not limited to
HIPAA, Michigan state law, and associated privacy and security
Rules promulgated pursuant to such laws;

      (d) BillNat and the Qualified Buyer/Covered Entity must
comply with their obligations with respect to the transfer of
confidential patient information to ensure that any such transfer
is in compliance with applicable privacy law and regulation,
including but not limited to HIPAA, Michigan state law, and
associated privacy and security Rules promulgated pursuant to such
laws;

      (e) BillNat and the Qualified Buyer agree to provide notice
to any consumer whose Customer PII is being sold and transferred.
That notice may be provided by a posting on BillNat's website or in
any initial contact email or communication;

      (f) BillNat is not required to obtain patient's consent to
sell or transfer PHI so long as PHI is sold or transferred to
another Covered Entity. BillNat must obtain patient consent to
transfer PHI to non-Covered Entity;

      (g) The Court should prohibit the transfer of PHI to any
entity that is neither: (i) a Covered Entity, nor (ii) a secure
records storage facility unless the Ombudsman has had an
opportunity to review such transfer and issue a supplemental
report;

      (h) The Qualified Buyer/Covered Entity shall file a
certification within 30 days confirming their compliance with the
conditions the Court may impose, or the Court may direct the
Ombudsman to file a final report confirming such compliance; and

      (i) BillNat and the Qualified Buyer agree to provide
consumers with an opportunity to opt-out of the transfer of
Customer PII as part of the notification process, to the extent
required by law.

If for any reason the Customer PII and/or the PHI is sold to any
other entity that would not meet the requirements of Qualified
Buyer or Covered Entity, then the Court should require that:

      (a) The purchaser must, at a minimum, agree to abide by or
substantially meet the standards of BillNat's existing privacy
policies;

      (b) The purchaser must agree to ensure that any such transfer
is in compliance with applicable privacy law and regulation,
including but not limited to the HIPAA, Michigan state law, Federal
regulations, and associated privacy and security rules promulgated
pursuant to such laws;

      (c) BillNat and the purchaser must provide notice to any
consumer whose PII it holds of the proposed transfer; and

      (d) To the extent purchaser is not a Covered Entity, BillNat
and the purchaser must obtain patient's consent prior to
transferring such patient's PHI. Otherwise, patient's consent is
not necessary so long as purchaser is a Covered Entity.

A full-text copy of the Ombudsman's Report, dated November 14,
2017, is available at https://tinyurl.com/y7vfkbkv

Consumer Privacy Ombudsman can be reached at:

            Salazar Law
            2000 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Penthouse
            Coral Gables, Florida 33134
            Telephone: (305) 374-4848
            Facsimile: (305) 397-1021
            Email: Luis@Salazar.law

                       About BillNat Corp.

BillNat Corporation operates 20 retail pharmacies from leased
facilities in Southern Michigan under the name "Sav-On Drugs".  It
was solely owned by Mr. William G. Newman until all of its capital
stock was acquired by the Frank W. Kerr Company in exchange for Mr.
Newman receiving additional shares of Kerr in a transaction that
closed in August 2015, but was retroactively effective as of Dec.
15, 2014.

Novi, Michigan-based Frank W. Kerr Company filed a Chapter 7
petition on Aug. 23, 2016.  The Debtor consented to and the Court
entered an order for relief under Chapter 11, converting the case
to a Chapter 11 proceeding (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No. 16-51724) on
Sept. 19, 2016.  Kerr tapped McDonald Hopkins PLC as counsel.  Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, serves as the Debtor's noticing, claims
and balloting agent. The Debtor hired Conway Mackenzie Management
Services, LLC, as restructuring consultant and Jeffrey K. Tischler
as chief restructuring officer.  

BillNat Corporation filed a petition seeking relief under Chapter
11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case No.
17-54357) on Oct. 13, 2017.

BillNat estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million and debt of
$50 million to $100 million.

The case judge is the Hon. Maria L. Oxholm.

On Nov. 9, the U.S. Trustee, Deniel M. McDermott, appointed two
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Billnat Corporation. The committee
members are: (1) Curt Johnson, Credit Manager (Committee Chair) and
(2) Michelle Konwinski, Controller.

The official committee of unsecured creditors retained Lowenstein
Sandler LLP as lead counsel; Wolfson Bolton PLLC as local counsel;
and BDO USA, LLP, as financial advisor.


BIOSCRIP INC: Appoints Tony Lopez as VP & Chief Accounting Officer
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Lopez was appointed as the vice president, chief accounting
officer and controller of Bioscrip, Inc., effective Nov. 29, 2017.
Mr. Lopez, 51, has over 30 years of experience as a client service
provider, financial statement preparer, auditor, standard setter
and regulator.  From 2012 to 2017, Mr. Lopez served as Partner
Emeritus/Director and from 2008 to 2010 as a partner at KPMG LLP,
where he provided accounting and forensic advisory support on US
GAAP accounting, IFRS, litigation support and related matters. From
2010 to 2012, he served as deputy chief auditor at the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board.  From 2006 to 2008 he served as
Senior Managing Director -- SEC and Accounting Advisory Leader for
FTI Consulting, and from 2003 to 2006 was an associate chief
accountant in the office of the chief accountant at the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission.  He previously served
positions with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board and as a vice president of two Fortune 100
companies.

The Company has provided to Mr. Lopez an offer letter, dated as of
Nov. 29, 2017, that provides for Mr. Lopez's salary and benefits.

Mr. Lopez's annual salary will be $275,000, and he is eligible to
participate in the Company's Share the Rewards Incentive Plan.  Mr.
Lopez is eligible for a bonus of up to 40% of his base salary, in
accordance with the terms of the Incentive Plan.

Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, Mr. Lopez
will be granted options to purchase 52,126 shares of the Company's
common stock.  If granted, the options will vest at a rate of
one-third per year over three years commencing on the first
anniversary of the grant date.

Mr. Lopez will be permitted to participate in all employee benefits
plans, policies, and practices now or hereafter maintained by or on
behalf of the Company, commensurate with his position and level of
individual contribution, if and to the extent he is eligible
pursuant to the terms of such plans, policies, and practices, which
may be modified by the Company at its discretion.

The Company and Mr. Lopez also executed a Severance Agreement in
connection with the Offer Letter, which provides that, subject to
certain conditions, if Mr. Lopez's employment is terminated by the
Company other than for "Cause," as defined in the Severance
Agreement, or by Mr. Lopez for "Good Reason," as defined in the
Severance Agreement, Mr. Lopez will be entitled to receive salary
continuation payments for 52 weeks following the date he executes
the Company's standard Separation and Release Agreement.

                       About BioScrip, Inc.

Headquartered in Denver, Colo., BioScrip, Inc. is a national
provider of infusion service that partners with physicians,
hospital systems, skilled nursing facilities and healthcare payors
to provide patients access to post-acute care services.  The
Company operates with a commitment to bring customer-focused
infusion therapy services into the home or alternate-site setting.
By collaborating with the full spectrum of healthcare professionals
and the patient, the Company aims to provide cost-effective care
that is driven by clinical excellence, customer service and values
that promote positive outcomes and an enhanced quality of life for
those whom it serves.  Visit http://www.bioscrip.comfor more
information.

BioScrip incurred a net loss attributable to common stockholders of
$50.59 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net
loss attributable to common stockholders of $309.51 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of Sept. 30, 2017, Bioscrip had
$590.24 million in total assets, $588.80 million in total
liabilities, $2.73 million in series A convertible preferred stock,
$76.70 million in series C convertible preferred stock, and a total
stockholders' deficit of $77.99 million.

                           *    *    *

Moody's Investors Service affirmed BioScrip, Inc.'s 'Caa2'
Corporate Family Rating.  BioScrip's Caa2 CFR reflects the
company's very high leverage and weak liquidity, as reported by the
TCR on Aug. 3, 2017.

In July 2017, S&P Global Ratings affirmed its 'CCC' corporate
credit rating on BioScrip Inc. and removed the rating from
CreditWatch, where it was placed with negative implications on Dec.
16, 2016.  The outlook is positive.  "The rating affirmation
reflects our view that, although BioScrip addressed its upcoming
maturities by refinancing its senior secured credit facilities and
improved its liquidity position, the company's credit measures will
remain weak in 2017 with debt leverage of about 14x (including our
treatment of preferred stock as debt) and funds from operations
(FFO) to debt in the low single digits.  We expect the company to
use about $15 million - $20 million of cash in 2017, inclusive of
cash charges associated with restructuring following the recently
announced United Healthcare contract termination."


BON-TON STORES: Pays Top Management $1.9M Retention Awards
----------------------------------------------------------
The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. paid a total of $1.98 million retention
awards to three of its named executive officers in consideration
their "exceptional" performance as follows:

   Named Executive Officer              Cash Retention Award
   -----------------------              --------------------
   William X. Tracy                           $900,000
   President & Chief Executive Officer

   Nancy A. Walsh                             $600,000
   Executive Vice President -
   Chief Financial Officer

   Stephen R. Byers                           $485,000
   Executive Vice President -
   Stores, Visual & Loss Prevention

With the authorization of Bon-Ton Stores' Board of Directors, the
Company entered into retention award agreements with certain senior
officers, including named executive officers, of the Company on or
about Nov. 24, 2017.  

"The Board determined that each of these employee's performance of
his or her duties has been and continues to be exceptional and
highly valuable to the Company and the continuation of the
employee's performance of these duties is critically important to
the Company's ability to manage successfully its business,
particularly in light of the challenging business environment
facing the Company," the Company stated in a Form 8-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Retention Agreements provide that the selected employee is
paid, contemporaneously upon entering into the Agreements, a cash
award that is subject to repayment by the employee if the
employee's employment is terminated under certain circumstances
prior to Jan. 1, 2019.  In the event that the employee's employment
is terminated prior to Jan. 1, 2019 due to a termination by the
Company for "Cause" or any termination by the employee other than
for "Good Reason", the employee must repay to the Company the
entire amount of the Award.  In the event that the employee's
employment by the Company is terminated prior to
Jan. 1, 2019 due to the employees' death or disability, a
termination by the Company without Cause or a termination by the
employee for Good Reason, the employee is not obligated to repay to
the Company any amount of the Award.

                  About The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc.

The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc., with corporate headquarters in York,
Pennsylvania and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, operates 260 stores, which
includes nine furniture galleries and four clearance centers, in 24
states in the Northeast, Midwest and upper Great Plains under the
Bon-Ton, Bergner's, Boston Store, Carson's, Elder-Beerman,
Herberger's and Younkers nameplates.  The stores offer a broad
assortment of national and private brand fashion apparel and
accessories for women, men and children, as well as cosmetics and
home furnishings.  The Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. is an active and
positive participant in the communities it serves.  For further
information, please visit http://investors.bonton.com.

Bon-Ton Stores reported a net loss of $63.41 million for the year
ended Jan. 28, 2017, a net loss of $57.05 million for the fiscal
year ended Jan. 30, 2016, and a net loss of $6.97 million for the
year ended Jan. 31, 2015.  As of Oct. 28, 2017, Bon-Ton Stores had
$1.58 billion in total assets, $1.74 billion in total liabilities
and a total shareholders' deficit of $155.96 million.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 27, 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its corporate credit rating on the York, Pa.-based department store
operator The Bon-Ton Stores Inc. to 'CCC' from 'CCC+'.  The outlook
is negative.  "The downgrade reflects our view that Bon-Ton could
pursue a debt restructuring to address its capital structure over
the next 12 months.  We believe Bon-Ton's existing capital
structure is unsustainable given our expectation for persistently
negative free operating cash flow, continued pressure on operating
performance, and diminishing revolver excess availability over
time.  There are no maturities over the next 12 months.

Also in November 2017, Moody's Investors Service downgraded The
Bon-Ton Stores Inc.,'s Corporate Family Rating to Caa3 from Caa1.
The downgrade reflects the high likelihood of a distressed exchange
to reduce its debt obligations and improve the company's long term
liquidity profile.


BOND AND COMPANY: Plan Filing Deadline Extended Through Jan. 12
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Michael G. Williamson of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida has extended, at the behest of Bond and
Company, Jewelers Inc., the deadline by which the Debtor has to
file its plan and disclosure statement is extended through and
including Jan. 12, 2018.  

The 120-day time period during which the Debtor has the exclusive
right to propose and file a plan of reorganization is extended
through and including Jan. 12, 2018.  The exclusivity period during
which only the Debtor may solicit acceptances of a plan of
reorganization is extended through and including the completion of
the hearing on confirmation of the Debtor's timely-filed plan.

              About Bond and Company Jewelers Inc.

Headquartered in St. Petersburg, Florida, Bond and Company,
Jewelers, Inc. -- dba Bond Jewelers, Bond Diamonds, and Pandora --
sells various kinds of jewelries with store branches in St.
Petersburg, Brandon and Sarasota Florida.  bonddiamonds.com, a
dynamic online jewelry commerce site, is the online marketing arm
of Bond Diamonds and Bond Jewelers.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 17-06561) on July 27, 2017, estimating its assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  The petition
was signed by Marvin K. Shavlan, its president.

Scott A. Stichter, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler,
P.A., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired
CBIZ MHM, LLC as its accountant.


BOWLING GREEN: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
William T. Neary, U.S. Trustee for the Northern Dsitrict of Texas,
on Nov. 28 appointed three creditors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of
Preferred Care Inc. and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     (1) PharMerica Corporation
         c/o Robert E. Dries,
         EVP and CFO
         1901 Campus Place
         Louisville, Kentucky 40299
         Tel: (502) 627-7000
         E-mail: robert.dries@pharmerica.com

     (2) Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
         c/o Patrick J. Orr,
         SVP of Financial Services
         3220 Tillman Drive, #300
         Bensalem, Pennsylvania 18940
         Tel: (215) 688-4359
         Fax: (215) 688-4361
         E-mail: porr@hcsgcorp.com

     (3) Cecil Gary
         c/o Sarah Ware, Legal Guardian
         110 Charles Avenue
         Kevil, Kentucky 42053
         Tel: (270) 519-3983

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense.  They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs.  Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                     About Bowling Green

Bowling Green Health Facilities, L.P., dba Bowling Green Nursing
and Rehabilitation Center, and its affiliates, including Preferred
Care Inc., filed voluntary protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex., Lead Case No. 17-44641) on Nov.
13, 2017.

Bowling Green Nursing and Rehabilitation Center --
http://www.bowlinggreennursing.com/-- is a nursing home in Bowling
Green, Kentucky.  It is a small facility with 66 beds and has
for-profit, corporate ownership.  Bowling Green Nursing and
Rehabilitation Center is not part of a continuing care retirement
community.  It participates in Medicare and Medicaid.

The case is assigned to Hon. Russell F. Nelms.

The Debtors' counsel is Stephen A. McCartin, Esq., and Mark C.
Moore, Esq., at Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP, in Dallas, Texas.

Bowling Green's Estimated Assets is $1 million to $10 million and
Estimated Liabilities is $1 million to $10 million.

The petitions were signed by Robert J. Riek, manager of general
partner.


C SWANK ENTERPRISES: Hunter to be Paid Over 7 Years at 3.75%
------------------------------------------------------------
C Swank Enterprises, LLC, filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Western District of Pennsylvania a third amended disclosure
statement dated Nov. 13, 2017, to accompany the Debtor's modified
third amended plan dated Nov. 13, 2017.

Class 11, Hunter Truck Sales & Service is the lien holder of 8
equipment finance contracts.  These vehicles were sold to the
Debtor by Hunter Truck Sales & Service as a vendor.  They were
financed through Paccar.  Hunter Truck sales and Service was "on
recourse" as part of the financing.  When the Debtor filed the
bankruptcy, Hunter Truck Sales & Service paid the balance of the
loans to Paccar in exchange for purchasing the primary security
interests over the vehicles, as agreed to by the parties and as
expressly ordered by the Court.  Thus, Hunter Truck Sales & Service
holds the primary secured lien on:

   A. 2016 Peterbilt 367-1NPTL40X1GM308535-RF# 73
   B. 2016 Peterbilt 367-1NPTL40X5GM308537-RF# 74
   C. 2016 Peterbilt 367-2NPTL40X5GM308527-RF# 75
   D. 2013 Peterbilt 388-1NPWX4EX9DD178788-RF# 38
   E. 2013 Peterbilt 388-1NPWX4EX7DD178787-RF# 37
   F. 2013 Peterbilt 388-1NPWX4EX8DD178778-RF# 56
   G. 2013 Peterbilt 388-1NPWX4EX8DD178779-RF# 57
   H. 2015 Peterbilt -1NPWL40X3FD251417-RF# 50

The amount will be paid in full over seven years at a fixed
interest rate of 3.75%.

Any class 16 general unsecured creditors will be paid in full on
the Plan Effective Date without interest.  The Debtor believes
there are no unsecured creditors.

The Plan does not contemplate any distribution to such creditors by
the Debtor. Rather, these creditors will receive payments from the
third party borrower.  Provided the third party fully performs, the
Class 17 claims -- Creditors who have claims arising from
Guaranties of related entities -- will be deemed paid, and no
further sums shall be owed by Debtor.  Additionally, so long as the
third party makes payments and otherwise fulfills its obligations,
the Class 17 creditors will be enjoined from taking any action
against the Debtor so long as the third party from which payment is
to be made in fact makes such payments and otherwise fulfills its
obligations to the Class 17 creditors. Upon confirmation of the
Plan, the obligations of the Debtor, any third party obligors, and
the Class 17 creditors will be governed by the applicable
agreements, contracts and other documents between them, except as
expressly modified by the Plan.

In the event the third party fails to perform, the injunction will
be dissolved automatically, and the Allowed Claim of the Class 17
creditor will then be treated as a General Unsecured Class 16. The
holder of a Class 17 Allowed Claim may exercise any and all
available rights and remedies they may have under the applicable
agreements, contracts and/or other documents and applicable law
against the third party obligor to recover the balances owed in
connection with their Class 17 Claims. Any amounts recovered from
any third party shall serve to reduce the amount of such holder’s
Allowed Class 17 Claim. The Debtor's rights against any third party
obligor, including for indemnification and/or contribution, are
fully reserved and preserved under the Plan.

The Plan will be funded by $8,409.88 in cash on hand as Sept. 27,
2017, and $87,000 in cash on hand as of the confirmation date.

The Effective Date of Plan is 15 days following entry of the court
order confirming the Plan.

A copy of the Third Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

         http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb16-23451-302.pdf

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Oct. 19, 2017, the
Debtor filed with the Court its latest disclosure statement to
accompany its plan of reorganization, dated Oct. 10, 2017, which
proposed that the Class 3 secured claim of Paccar Financial --
totaling $583,700.76 -- would be paid in full over seven years with
a fixed interest rate of five 5%.

                 About C Swank Enterprises

Headquartered in Apollo, Pennsylvania, C Swank Enterprises, LLC,
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case
No. 16-23451) on Sept. 15, 2016, estimating its assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  The petition
was signed by Carol A. Swank, managing member.

Judge Carlota M. Bohm presides over the case.

Donald R. Calaiaro, Esq., at Calaiaro Valencik serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.

The Debtor has no unsecured creditor, according to its Chapter 11
petition.


CBK FUTURES: Hires Wickens Herzer Panza Cook as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
CBK Futures, Inc. seeks authority from the United States Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Ohio in Cleveland to employ
Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co. as counsel.

General legal services required of WHP are:

     (a) counsel the Debtor on its obligations and duties;

     (b) execute the Debtor's decisions by filing with the Court
motions, objections, and other relevant documents, as necessary;

     (c) appear before the Court on all matters in the case
relevant to the interests of the Debtor;

     (d) assist the Debtor in the administration of the Debtor's
chapter 11 case; and

     (e) take such other actions as are necessary to protect the
rights of the Debtor's estates.

The firm's billing rates are:

     Senior Attorney        $235 - $480
     Of Counsel Attorney    $250 - $385
     Associate Attorney     $185 - $280
     Paralegals             $80
     Law Clerks             $75 - $105

Christopher W. Peer attests that WHP is a "disinterested person" as
that term is defined in section 101(14) and his firm does not hold
any interest materially adverse to the Debtor or its estate.

The Counsel can be reached through:

     Christopher W. Peer, Esq.
     John A. Polinko, Esq.
     WICKENS, HERZER, PANZA, COOK & BATISTA CO.
     35765 Chester Road
     Avon, OH 44011-1262
     Phone: (440) 695-8000
     Fax: (440) 695-8098
     E-mail: Cpeer@wickenslaw.com
             JPolinko@WickensLaw.com

                    About CBK Futures, Inc.

CBK Futures, Inc., is a privately held company in Westlake, Ohio,
in the restaurants management business.  The company is an
affiliate of Unique Ventures Group, LLC, which sought bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-20526) on Feb. 13, 2017.

CBK Futures, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Case no. 17-16795) on November 17, 2017. The petition was signed by
Dennis P. Zarrelli, vice president.

The Debtor is represented by Christopher W. Peer, Esq. and John A.
Polinko, Esq. at Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co. as
counsel. Judge Jessica E. Price Smith presides over the case.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $500,000 to $1 million
in assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.


CBK FUTURES: Taps Wickens Herzer as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
CBK Futures, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Northern District of Ohio to hire Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook
& Batista Co. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code and will provide other legal services related to
its Chapter 11 case.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Senior Attorney         $235 - $480
     Of Counsel Attorney     $250 - $385
     Associate Attorney      $185 - $280
     Paralegals                      $80
     Law Clerks               $75 - $105

Christopher Peer, Esq., and John Polinko, Esq., the attorneys who
are expected to handle the case, will charge $300 per hour and
$300 per hour, respectively.

Mr. Peer disclosed in a court filing that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Christopher W. Peer, Esq.
     John A. Polinko, Esq.
     Wickens, Herzer, Panza, Cook & Batista Co.
     35765 Chester Road
     Avon, OH 44011-1262
     Phone: (440) 695-8000
     Fax: (440) 695-8098
     Email: Cpeer@wickenslaw.com
     Email: JPolinko@WickensLaw.com

                        About CBK Futures Inc.

CBK Futures, Inc. is a privately-held company in Westlake, Ohio in
the restaurants management business.  It sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No.
17-16795) on November 17, 2017.  Dennis P. Zarrelli, its
vice-president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of $1
million to $10 million.

Judge Jessica E. Price Smith presides over the case.

CBK Futures is an affiliate of Unique Ventures Group, LLC, which
sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-20526) on
Feb. 13, 2017.


CCT COMMUNICATIONS: Did Not Commit Breach of Purchase Agreement
---------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned CCT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., v. ZONE TELECOM,
INC., (SC 19574) (Conn.), the Supreme Court of Connecticut reversed
the judgment of the trial court which ruled in favor of defendant
Zone Telecom, Inc.

The plaintiff, CCT Communications, Inc., appeals from the judgment
of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Zone
Telecom, Inc., on the plaintiff's complaint and the defendant's
counterclaim for damages and declaratory judgment.

The case arises from a purchase agreement entered into by the
parties in which the plaintiff was to provide various equipment,
software, and services to the defendant for a telecommunications
switch room located in Los Angeles, California.

On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court incorrectly
rendered judgment in favor of the defendant on the plaintiff's
complaint and the defendant's counterclaim. Specifically, the
plaintiff asserts that the trial court incorrectly (1) concluded
that it breached the purchase agreement by filing a petition for
bankruptcy protection under chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code;
(2) determined that a letter from the defendant dated Feb. 5, 2007,
was an effective exercise of the defendant's right to terminate the
purchase agreement, (3) failed to award the plaintiff certain
damages on count one of its complaint, and (4) awarded the
defendant damages, costs, and attorney's fees in excess of a
limitation of liability clause in the purchase agreement.

The Court agrees that the trial court incorrectly concluded that
the plaintiff's bankruptcy petition constituted a breach of the
purchase agreement and permitted the defendant to terminate that
agreement.

In its memorandum of decision, the trial court appeared to
misunderstand the nature of the defendant's breach of contract
counterclaim, construing it as alleging that the plaintiff had
breached the purchase agreement by filing for bankruptcy
protection. The court then spent seventeen pages parsing the
bankruptcy code, ultimately concluding that the relevant provisions
did not preclude the defendant from exercising its contractual
right to terminate the purchase agreement.

The trial court's articulation also did little to clarify the basis
for its decision or to dispel the ambiguities identified by the
parties. Although one can read the tea leaves in different ways,
the fact that the trial court repeatedly has stated that it found
breach of contract on the basis of bankruptcy, but studiously has
avoided making any clear, express statement that it also found a
breach for failure to provide service, strongly favors the
plaintiff's interpretation of the decision. In any event, having
canvassed the full trial record and reviewed the parties' arguments
on reconsideration, the Court is persuaded that the court's
memorandum of decision, without additional findings, is simply
insufficient to support a conclusion that the plaintiff breached
the purchase agreement by failing to provide adequate service.

A full-text copy of the Court's Opinion dated Nov. 21, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/FElufk from Leagle.com.

Joseph K. Scully -- jkscully@daypitney.com -- with whom was Jeffrey
P. Mueller, for the appellant (plaintiff).

William M. Murphy -- wmurphy@bpslaw.com -- for the appellee
(defendant).

                      About CCT Communications

CCT Communications, Inc., was a common carrier engaged in the
business of buying and reselling telecommunications services.  CCT
filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 07-10210) on
Jan. 29, 2007, represented by Arnold Mitchell, Esq., at Greene
Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C., at that time.
Sanford P. Rosen, Esq., at Rosen & Associates, P.C., and Glenn B.
Manishin, Esq., at Duane Morris LLP, also represent the Debtor.  At
the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $774,047
in assets and debts of $1,028,249.

CCT filed a Plan of Reorganization on the last possible day -- Nov.
26, 2007 -- to do so as a small business debtor.  The Debtor
intended to fund the plan distributions, at least in part, with the
proceeds generated through adversary proceedings against Global
Crossing Telecommunications, Inc., and Zone Telecom, Inc.  The
Honorable Stuart M. Bernstein conducted a two-day evidentiary
hearing, and concluded that CCT is judicially estopped from taking
the position that it is not a small business debtor.  Chief Judge
Bernstein ruled that the case will be dismissed, but the Court will
retain jurisdiction over the adversary proceeding between CCT and
Global Crossing as well as any fee applications by Court-appointed
professionals.


COBALT INTERNATIONAL: Forgoes $8.1 Million Notes Interest Payment
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Cobalt International Energy, Inc. has elected not to make the
interest payment of approximately $8.1 million due on Dec. 1, 2017
with respect to its outstanding 2.625% Convertible Senior Notes due
2019.  The indenture governing the 2019 Notes permits the Company a
30-day grace period to make the interest payment.  If the Company
fails to make the interest payment within the grace period an event
of default will result, and the trustee or noteholders holding at
least 25% in the aggregate outstanding principal amount of 2019
Notes may elect to accelerate the 2019 Notes causing them to be
immediately due and payable.  In addition, an event of default
under the indenture governing the 2019 Notes would trigger an event
of default under all of the Company's other outstanding
indebtedness, as disclosed in a Form 8-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

                   About Cobalt International

Formed in 2005 and headquartered in Houston, Texas, Cobalt
International Energy, Inc., is an independent exploration and
production company with operations currently focused in the
deepwater U.S. Gulf of Mexico.  In January 2016, the Company
achieved initial production of oil and gas from the Heidelberg
field.  The Company's exploration efforts in the U.S. Gulf of
Mexico have resulted in four oil and gas discoveries including the
North Platte, Shenandoah, Anchor, and Heidelberg fields, each of
which are in various stages of appraisal and development.  The
Company also has a non-operated interest in the Diaba Block
offshore Gabon.

Cobalt International reported a net loss of $2.34 billion for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016, a net loss of $694.43 million for the
fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2015, and a net loss of $510.76 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014.  As of Sept. 30, 2017, Cobalt had
$1.69 billion in total assets, $3.16 billion in total liabilities
and a total stockholders' deficit of $1.47 billion.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016, stating that the Company has near-term
liquidity constraints that raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


COCRYSTAL PHARMA: Raises $1 Million in Debt Financing
-----------------------------------------------------
Cocrystal Pharma, Inc., entered into a securities purchase
agreement with two accredited investors, including the Company's
Chairman of the Board, pursuant to which the Company sold an
aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 of its 8% Convertible
Notes due Nov. 24, 2019, as disclosed in a Form 8-K report filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  At the option of the
holder, the Notes are convertible at $0.27 per share.  In the event
the Company will close on a Qualified Financing (as defined in the
Note) or there is a change of control of the Company (or sale of
substantially all of the Company's assets), the outstanding
principal amount of the Notes will automatically convert.  Upon a
Qualified Financing, the Conversion price of the Note will be the
lesser of (i) $0.27 per share and (ii) the price per share of the
securities sold in the Qualified Financing.

The Company intends to use the net proceeds of the offering for
working capital and general corporate purposes.

The Notes were issued and sold in reliance upon the exemption from
registration contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of
1933 and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder.  These Notes (and the
shares of common stock underlying the Notes) may not be offered or
sold in the United States in the absence of an effective
registration statement or exemption from the registration
requirements under the Act.  The investors are accredited investors
and there was no general solicitation.

                       About Cocrystal Pharma

Cocrystal Pharma, Inc., formerly known as Biozone Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., is a pharmaceutical company with a mission to discover novel
antiviral therapeutics as treatments for serious and/or chronic
viral diseases.  Based in Tucker, Georgia, Cocrystal Pharma employs
unique technologies and Nobel Prize winning expertise to create
first- and best-in-class antiviral drugs.  These technologies and
the Company's market-focused approach to drug discovery are
designed to efficiently deliver small molecule therapeutics that
are safe, effective and convenient to administer.

The report from BDO USA, LLP, in Seattle, Washington, the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, included an explanatory paragraph stating that that
the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has
an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.

Cocrystal Pharma reported a net loss of $74.87 million in 2016, a
net loss of $50.12 million in 2015 and a net loss of $99,000 in
2014.  As of Sept. 30, 2017, Cocrystal Pharma had $122.25 million
in total assets, $22.25 million in total liabilities and $99.99
million in total stockholders' equity.


COLORADO NATIONAL: Committee Taps Markus Williams Young as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Colorado National
Bancorp seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Colorado to hire Markus Williams Young & Zimmermann LLC
as its counsel.

The professional services that Markus Williams is to render are:

     a. attend Committee meetings;

     b. review financial and operational information furnished by
the Debtor to the Committee;

     c. advise the Committee with respect to its rights, powers and
duties in the chapter 11 case;

     d. assist the Committee with investigation of assets,
liabilities and financial condition of Debtor and of the operation
of the Debtor's business in order to maximize the value of the
Debtor's assets for the benefit of all creditors;

     e. advise the Committee in connection with any potential sales
of assets or business;

     f. assist the Committee in its analysis of and negotiation
with any third party concerning matters related to, among other
things, the terms of a plan of reorganization;

     g. assist and advise the Committee with respect to any
communications with the general creditor body regarding significant
matters in the captioned case;

     h. commence and prosecute necessary and appropriate actions
and/or proceedings on behalf of the Committee;

     i. review, analyze or prepare on behalf of the Committee all
necessary applications, motions, answers, orders, reports,
schedules, pleadings and other documents;

     j. represent the Committee at all hearings and other
proceedings; and

     k. perform all other necessary legal services in the Chapter
11 case as may be requested by the Committee in the Chapter 11
case.

The current hourly rates for Markus Williams professionals are:

     James T. Markus       $445
     Steven R Rider        $430
     Donald D. Allen       $365
     Jennifer Salisbury    $365
     Matthew T. Faga       $350
     Bradley T. Hunsicker  $310

Donald D. Allen, attorney the law firm of Markus Williams Young &
Zimmermann LLC, attests that the firm is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. Section 101(14).

The Counsel can be reached through:

     Donald D. Allen, Esq.
     MARKUS WILLIAMS YOUNG & ZIMMERMANN LLC
     1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 4550
     Denver, CO 80203
     Tel: (303) 830-0800
     Fax: (303) 830-0809
     Email: dallen@markuswilliams.com

                  About Colorado National Bancorp

Colorado National Bancorp, formerly known as Community Bank
Partners Inc., operates as a bank holding company for Colorado
National Bank that provides banking products and services to
businesses and consumers in Colorado and surrounding states.  It
was incorporated in 2009 and is based in Denver, Colorado.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-20315) on November 8, 2017.
Scott D. Jackson, its chief executive officer, signed the
petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Elizabeth E. Brown presides over the case.


CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL: Falls Short of Nasdaq's Bid Price Rule
---------------------------------------------------------------
Concordia International Corp. announced that on Nov. 29, 2017, it
received an initial notification letter from the Listing
Qualifications Department of the NASDAQ Global Select Market
notifying the Company that it had 180 days to regain compliance
with the minimum bid price requirement set forth in Nasdaq's
continued listing rules.

Nasdaq's continued listing rules require that listed securities
maintain a minimum bid price of US$1.00 per share, and that a
failure to meet the minimum bid price requirement exists if the
deficiency continues for a period of 30 consecutive business days.
The Company's common shares traded below a bid price of US$1.00 for
30 consecutive business days from Oct. 17, 2017, to Nov. 28, 2017.
As a result, the Company does not currently meet the minimum bid
price requirement.

The Company's common shares remain listed on Nasdaq and Concordia
has until May 29, 2018, to regain compliance with the minimum bid
price requirement to maintain the listing.

To regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement, the
Company's common shares must have a closing bid price of at least
US$1.00 for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days.  In the
event the Company does not regain compliance with the minimum bid
price requirement by May 29, 2018, Concordia has the option to
apply to Nasdaq for additional time to regain compliance.

The Company's common shares are also listed on the TSX and the
initial notification letter is unrelated to Concordia's continued
listing on the TSX.

                          About Concordia

Concordia is an international specialty pharmaceutical company with
a diversified portfolio of more than 200 patented and off-patent
products, and sales in more than 90 countries.  Going forward, the
Company is focused on becoming a leader in European specialty,
off-patent medicines.  Concordia operates out of facilities in
Oakville, Ontario and, through its subsidiaries, operates out of
facilities in Bridgetown, Barbados; London, England and Mumbai,
India.  Visit www.concordiarx.com for more information.

Concordia reported a net loss of US$1.31 billion for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of US$31.56 million in 2015.
As of Sept. 30, 2017, Concordia had US$2.65 billion in total
assets, US$4.12 billion in total liabilities and a total
shareholders' deficit of US$1.47 billion.

                           *    *    *

As reported by the TCR on Oct. 27, 2017, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded the Corporate Family Rating of Concordia to 'Ca' from
'Caa3'.  "Concordia's Ca Corporate Family Rating reflects its very
high financial leverage, ongoing operating headwinds, and imminent
risk of a debt restructuring.  Moody's estimates adjusted
debt/EBITDA will exceed 9.0x over the next 12 months as earnings
decline on a year over year basis."

As reported by the TCR on Oct. 19, 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered
its corporate credit rating on Concordia to 'SD' from 'CCC-' and
removed the rating from CreditWatch, where it was placed with
negative implications on Sept. 18, 2017.  "The downgrade follows
Concordia International's announcement that it failed to make the
Oct. 16, 2016, interest payment on the 7% senior unsecured notes
due 2023.  Given our view of the company's debt level as
unsustainable, and ongoing restructuring discussions, we do not
expect the company to make a payment within the grace period."


CONNEAUT LAKE VOLUNTEER: Unsecureds to Recoup 5% Under Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conneaut Lake Volunteer Fire Department of Conneaut Lake Borough
and Sadsbury Township filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Pennsylvania a disclosure statement dated Nov.
13, 2017, referring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization dated
Nov. 13, 2017.

Class 3 General unsecured creditors will be paid a dividend on
allowed claims of 5% payable as follows: 1% 30 days after
confirmation of the Plan; 1% on or before March 31, 2019; 1% on or
before March 31, 2020; 1% on or before March 31, 2021; and a final
1% on or before March 31, 2022.  For convenience purposes, the
Debtor may elect to make a one-time distribution of 5% 30 days
after confirmation of the Plan where the claimant holds a total
claim of $5,000 or less.

The Plan will be funded by continued operation of fire department
and food & beverage service.  Current management will continue to
operate the business functions profitably.  Payment will be made
from current available cash.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/pawb17-10818-76.pdf

                       About Conneaut Lake
                     Volunteer Fire Department

The Conneaut Lake Volunteer Fire Department of Conneaut Lake
Borough and Sadsbury Township provides fire protection services in
the borough of Conneaut Lake and the southern and eastern portions
of neighboring Sadsbury Township.

The Conneaut Lake Volunteer Fire Department filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 17-10818) on Aug. 8, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Timothy Latta, president.  The Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities to be between $1 million and $10
million.

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas P. Agresti.

The Debtor is represented by Daniel P. Foster, Esq., at Foster Law
Offices, LLC.

It previously sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case
No. 16-10019) on Jan. 12, 2016.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Conneaut Lake Volunteer Fire
Department as of Sept. 14, according to a court docket.


CTI BIOPHARMA: Had $31.5M Net Financial Standing as of Oct. 31
--------------------------------------------------------------
CTI BioPharma Corp. or CTI Parent Company reported total estimated
and unaudited net financial standing of $31.5 million as of  Oct.
31, 2017.  The total estimated and unaudited net financial standing
of CTI Consolidated Group as of Oct. 31, 2017, was $31.3 million.

CTI Parent Company trade payables outstanding for greater than 30
days were approximately $1.3 million as of Oct. 31, 2017. CTI
Consolidated Group trade payables outstanding for greater than 30
days were approximately $1.5 million as of Oct. 31, 2017. During
October 2017, there were solicitations for payment only within the
ordinary course of business and there were no injunctions or
suspensions of supply relationships that affected the course of
normal business.

As of Oct. 31, 2017, there were no amounts overdue of a financial
or tax nature, or amounts overdue to social security institutions
or overdue to employees.

During the month of October 2017, the Company's common stock, no
par value, outstanding decreased by 6,799 shares.  As a result, the
number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock as of Oct.
31, 2017 was 42,970,377.

A full-text copy of the press release is available at:

                      https://is.gd/0mHMaR

                       About CTI BioPharma

Based in Seattle, WA, CTI BioPharma Corp. (NASDAQ and MTA: CTIC) is
a biopharmaceutical company focused on the acquisition, development
and commercialization of novel targeted therapies covering a
spectrum of blood-related cancers that offer a unique benefit to
patients and healthcare providers.  The Company has a late-stage
development pipeline, including pacritinib for the treatment of
patients with myelofibrosis. CTI BioPharma is headquartered in
Seattle, Washington.  For additional information and to sign up for
email alerts and get RSS feeds, please visit www.ctibiopharma.com.
              
CTI Biopharma reported a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $52 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, a net
loss attributable to common shareholders of $122.6 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015, and a net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $95.99 million.  The Company had $65.53 million in
total assets, $37.12 million in total liabilities and $28.41
million in total shareholders' equity as of Sept. 30, 2017.

The Company's available cash and cash equivalents were $52.8
million as of Sept. 30, 2017.  CTI believes that its present
financial resources, together with payments projected to be
received under certain contractual agreements and its ability to
control costs, will only be sufficient to fund its operations into
the third quarter of 2018.  This raises substantial doubt about the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL: Tap Ferrere Abogados as Ecuador Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dynamic International Airways, LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of North Carolina,
Greensboro Division, to hire employ Ferrere Abogados Ecuador Ferec
S.A. as special counsel in the Republic of Ecuador.

Legal services required of Ferrere are:

     a. represent the Debtor before local administrative entities
in Ecuador in accordance with instructions from the Debtor;

     b. obtain all necessary permits and authorizations from
governmental and regulatory authorities;

     c. complete all necessary step for updating said registrations
as needed;

     d. consult with the Debtor from time to time on legal matters
with respect to aviation and the operation in Ecuador;

     e. make the Debtor aware of all relevant information
concerning local laws, regulations and restrictions affecting the
passage of aircraft passengers and cargo in Ecuador, including
those relating to taxes, customs, immigration, currency and health
and will promptly advise any alteration;

     f. renew, maintain and update the Debtor's registrations
before all municipal entities;

     g. assist the Debtor with customs and bond requirements and
renewals;

     h. review, prepare, register and advise on all contracts when
the counter-party is Ecuadorian or located in Ecuador;

     i. assist the Debtor in complying with the local; and
international legal, statutory, and regulatory requirements with
respect to the opening, running and closing of a Debtor entity in
Ecuador;

     j. take steps to ensure that the Debtor activities remain
compliant with all laws and regulations on Ecuador. Counsel will
also review and prepare employment severance and dismissal
agreement;

     k. coordinate and cooperate with the Debtor's internal and
external accountants, auditors, sales and operations in Ecuador.

Ernesto Javier Weisson Hidalgo, Esq. attests that neither Ferrere
nor any of its partners or associates, hold any interest adverse to
the Debtor's estate.

The firm's hourly rates for legal services are:

     Partner           $205-$200
     Senior Associate  $185
     Associate         $140
     Paralegal         $70

The Special Counsel can be reached through:

     Ernesto Javier Weisson Hidalgo, Esq.
     FERRERE ABOGADOS ECUADOR FEREC S.A.
     Av. 12 de Octubre N-26-48 y Lincoln
     Edificio Mirage, Piso 7
     RUC 1792573408001
     Phone: (593) 238-10950

                About Dynamic International Airways

Dynamic International Airways, LLC owns and operates a full-service
aviation enterprise, and is a licensed and certificated air
carrier. It was formed in 2010 and operates in High Point, North
Carolina.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case No. 17-10814) on July 19, 2017. The case
is assigned to Judge Catharine R. Aron. At the time of the filing,
the Debtor disclosed that it had estimated assets of $10 million to
$50 million and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The Debtor hired Bell Davis & Pitt, PA, and Garman Turner Gordon
LLP, as attorneys, and MJAC L.L.C., d/b/a Allison Consulting, as
financial advisor.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Debtor's case. The committee hired Saul Ewing LLP and Poyner
Spruill LLP as its bankruptcy counsel, and AlixPartners, LLP, as
financial advisor.


EAST NY REALTY: Taps Mishiyeva Law as Legal Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
East NY Realty II Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire Mishiyeva Law,
PLLC as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; assist in the preparation of a plan of
reorganization; give advice on its financial transactions; and
provide other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

The firm will charge $400 per hour for the services of its partners
and of counsel.  Paraprofessionals charge an hourly fee of $225.

Kamilla Mishiyeva, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that the firm
is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

Mishiyeva Law can be reached through:

     Kamilla Mishiyeva, Esq.
     Mishiyeva Law, PLLC
     85 Broad Street 18th Floor
     New York, NY 10004
     Phone: (646) 535-1667

                   About East NY Realty II Inc.

East NY Realty II Inc. owns a single-residential condo unit located
at 633 East New York Avenue, Unit 4R, Brooklyn, New York.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-44751) on September 14, 2017.
Yona Gelernter, authorized representative, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of less than $500,000.

Judge Carla E. Craig presides over the case.


ENCLAVE BUSINESS: Hires Property Services Group as Appraiser
------------------------------------------------------------
Enclave Business Park, L.P. seeks approval from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee in Knoxville
to employ Mike Smith and Property Services Group, nunc pro tunc to
November 20, 2017, to appraise the debtor's property at
Mitchell/Boeing Road, in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

Mr. Smith estimates that the appraisal will cost between $3,500.00
and $5,000.00.

Mr. Smith attests that neither he nor his firm hold or represent an
interest adverse to the estate or any class of creditors or equity
security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect relationship
to, connection with, or interest in the Debtor or for any other
reason.  He and his firm are disinterested persons as set forth in
11 U.S.C.Sec. 327.

The Appraiser can be reached through:

     Mike Smith
     Property Services Group, Inc.
     1999 Centerpoint Parkway, Ste. 1000
     Pontiac, MI 48341
     Phone: 248-637-9800
     Fax: 248-637-3280

                   About Enclave Business Park

Enclave Business Park filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.
Tenn. Case No. 17-33343) on November 3, 2017. The petition was
signed by Walter Wise, president of general partner EBP, Inc.

Enclave Business Park owns in fee simple interest 32 acres of land
located at Mitchell Road Oak Ridge, Tennessee valued at $4 million.
The Debtor listed its business as a Single Asset Real Estate (as
defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).

The Hon. Suzanne H. Bauknight presides over the case. Thomas Lynn
Tarpy, Esq. at Tarpy, Cox, Fleishman & Leveille, PLLC represents
the Debtor as counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $4.92 million in assets
and $1.76 million in liabilities.


ENVIGO INTERNATIONAL: Moody's Rates $300MM Sr. Sec. Term Loan B3
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 rating to Envigo
International Holdings, Inc.'s (together with Envigo Laboratories
Inc., "Envigo") proposed senior secured credit facilities. The
ratings on this proposed credit facilities are not under review.
All of Envigo Laboratories Inc.'s existing ratings remain under
review for upgrade, including the Caa1 Corporate Family Rating
(CFR) and Caa1-PD Probability of Default Rating (PDR). The proposed
credit facilities consist of a 6-year $300 million senior secured
term loan B and a 5-year $50 million senior secured revolving
credit facility. The issuance of the credit facilities is
contingent upon the completion of Envigo's announced merger with
publicly traded, Avista Healthcare Public Acquisition Corp.
("AHPAC"). Cash on hand, a portion of the AHPAC cash investment,
and proceeds from the new credit facility will be used to refinance
all of Envigo's existing debt.

Moody's placed Envigo's ratings under review for upgrade on August
24, 2017 following the company's announcement that it had entered
into a definitive merger agreement with AHPAC. Moody's anticipates
that Envigo's Corporate Family Rating will be upgraded by one notch
to B3 following the transaction as a result of a material decrease
in financial leverage. Management expects the transaction to close
in the first quarter of 2018. Upon transaction close, Moody's
expects to withdraw all ratings at Envigo Laboratories Inc. and
assign a CFR and PDR to Envigo International Holdings, Inc.

Ratings assigned:

Envigo International Holdings, Inc.

$300 million senior secured term loan B at B3 (LGD3)

$50 million senior secured revolving credit facility at B3 (LGD3)

Ratings unchanged and still under review for upgrade:

Envigo Laboratories Inc.:

Corporate Family Rating, Caa1

Probability of Default Rating, Caa1-PD

Senior secured 1st lien term loans, B2 (LGD2)

Senior secured 2nd lien term loan, Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook, Rating Under Review

RATINGS RATIONALE

The anticipated one notch upgrade of Envigo's CFR to B3 reflects
the decrease in debt/EBITDA from about 7.5x currently to around
5.0x pro forma for Envigo's announced transaction with AHPAC. Good
industry fundamentals combined with cost saving efforts will
support earnings improvement through 2018. As a result Moody's
believes that debt/EBITDA will improve to around 4.5 times by the
end of 2018. Envigo's credit profile benefits from its good
customer relationships and high barriers to entry in both of its
business segments. However, Envigo's rating is constrained by its
small size compared to its main competitors. High profit
concentration in the UK exposes Envigo to earnings volatility
associated with currency fluctuations and economic risk related to
Brexit. The company has higher-than-normal exposure to currency
changes due to the fact that most of its earnings are generated in
British Pounds, while its debt is denominated in US dollars. Envigo
is also subject to earnings volatility inherent in the biomedical
research industry and secular demand declines for its laboratory
animals (research models).

Should the transaction not close as proposed, the credit facilities
will not be issued, and it is highly unlikely that Moody's would
upgrade Envigo's CFR. Envigo's credit profile would need to be
reevaluated at that time.

The proposed senior secured credit facilities are rated B3, (the
same as the anticipated B3 CFR). This reflects the fact that this
debt represents the preponderance of debt in the capital structure.
It also reflects a one notch override from the Loss Given Default
Model implied outcome. The override reflect Moody's view that
Envigo's pension liabilities, which will be junior to the proposed
credit facilities, will decline over the next few years.

Headquartered in New Jersey, Envigo is an early stage contract
research organization (CRO). The company provides non-clinical
safety assessment services. It also provides laboratory animals
(e.g., rats and mice) for use in non-clinical research by the
pharmaceutical, chemical and crop protection industries, as well as
academic and governmental institutions. Revenues approximate $400
million.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Business and
Consumer Service Industry published in October 2016.



EVERGREEN PRODUCTS: Taps Guarino Law as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------
Evergreen Products, LLC seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Disrict of New Jersey to employ Philip Guarino, Esq.
as counsel for the Debtor-in-possession.

The Debtor needs representation in order to confirm a plan or
reorganization and otherwise conclude its bankruptcy case.

Mr. Guarino charges $250 per hour for his services.

Mr. Guarino assures this Court that he is a disinterested person
under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14) and does not hold any interest adverse
to the Debtor or the estate.

Mr. Guarino maintains office at:

     Philip Guarino, Esq.
     GUARINO LAW, LLC
     26 Park Street, Suite 2057
     Montclair, NJ 07042
     Tel: 973-272-4147
     Fax: 973-528-0635
     E-mail: pguarino2@gmail.com

                   About Evergreen Products LLC

Founded in 2004, Evergreen Products LLC is a manufacturer of
packaged terminal air conditioning units.  Evergreen offers
customers the latest eco-friendly Minisplit products with advanced
remote control features. Evergreen's offices and warehouses are
located in Woodside, New York.

Evergreen filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. N.J. Case No.
17-31858) on October 27, 2017. The petition was signed by
Christopher Powis, its president.  The Debtor is represented by
Philip Guarino, Esq. at Guarino Law, LLC.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $0 to $50,000 in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.


EXELCO INTERNATIONAL: Case Summary & 20 Top Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates that filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions:

     Debtor                                      Case No.
     ------                                      --------
     Exelco (Asia) Limited                       17-12558
     359-361 Queen's Road Central
     17/F Nan Dao Commercial Building
     Flat 1701B
     Hong Kong

     Exelco International Limited                17-12559
     Level 2 Alexander House
     Cybercity
     Ebene
     Mauritius

Business Description: Based in Mauritius, Exelco International
                      Limited and its affiliates are engaged in
                      the business of diamond trading.  Exelco
                      International Limited is the 100% owner of
                      Exelco North America, Inc.  Exelco North
                      America (Case No. 17-12029); Exelco NV (Case
                      No. 17-12030); FTK Worldwide Manufacturing
                      BVBA (Case No. 17-12031); Ideal Diamond
                      Trading USA Inc. Case No. 17-12032) and
                      Ideal Diamond Trading Limited (Case No. 17-
                      12202) each filed for filed for Chapter 11
                      bankruptcy protection on Sept. 26, 2017.
                      Exelco NV is owned by the following Debtor
                      and non-Debtors: Exelco International
                      Limited (2%); Lior Kunstler (49%) and Jean
                      Paul Tolkowsky (49%).  Debtor FTK Worldwide
                      Manufacturing BVBA is owned by the following
                      non-Debtors: Lior Kunstler (50%) and Jean
                      Paul Tolkowsky (50%).  Debtor Ideal Diamond
                      Trading USA Inc. is 100% owned by Debtor
                      Ideal Diamond Trading Limited.  Debtor Ideal
                      Diamond Trading Limited is 100% owned by
                      Debtor Exelco International Limited.  Debtor
                      Exelco International Limited is owned by the
                      following non-Debtors: Lior Kunstler (50%)
                      and Jean Paul Tolkowsky (50%).  Debtor
                      Exelco (Asia) Limited i 100% owned by Debtor

                      Exelco International Limited.

Chapter 11
Petition Date:        December 3, 2017

Court:                United States Bankruptcy Court
                      District of Delaware (Delaware)

Judge:                Hon. Kevin Gross

Debtors'
General
Bankruptcy
Counsel:              HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP

Debtors'
Local
Bankruptcy
Counsel:              Michael R. Nestor, Esq.
                      YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
                      Rodney Square
                      1000 North King Street
                      Wilmington, DE 19801
                      Tel: 302-571-6600
                      Fax: 302-571-1253
                      Email: bankfilings@ycst.com
                             mnestor@ycst.com

Debtors'
Claims &
Noticing
Agent:                DONLIN RECANO & CO. INC.
                      Web site:  
                      https://www.donlinrecano.com

                                         Estimated   Estimated
                                          Assets    Liabilities
                                        ----------  -----------
Exelco (Asia) Limited                    $1M-$10M     $1M-$10M
Exelco International Limited            $10M-$50M    $10M-$50M

The petition was signed by Kris Cuyvers, chief restructuring
officer.

Full-text copies of the petitions are available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12558.pdf
            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12559.pdf

Second Amended Consolidated List of Creditors Holding 20 Largest
Unsecured Claims:

   Entity                        Nature of Claim      Claim Amount
   ------                        ---------------      ------------
Eurostar Diamond Traders            Trade Debt          $6,039,394
Hovenierstraat
53, 2018 Antwerp
Belgium
Email: ashin.kothari@eurostardiamond.com

I.D.H. Diamonds NV                  Trade Debt          $3,198,490
Pelikaanstraat 78 bus 105, 2018
Antwerp, Belgium
Email: elianthe@idhtitanium.com

Vitraag BVBA                        Trade Debt          $2,526,354
Hovenierstraat 30, 2018
Antwerp, Belgium
Email: vitraag@pandora.be

Trau Bros NV                        Trade Debt          $2,514,217
Hovenierstraat 53, 2018 Antwerp
Belgium
Email: info@traubros.be

N. Shah & Co. BVBA                  Trade Debt          $2,341,433
Hovenierstraat 53, Office 909
Box 6
2018 Antwerp, Belgium
Email: naresh.shah@telenet.be

Rottenberg Mardochee                  Loan              $1,155,131
Helanalei 5, 2018
Antwerp, Belgium
Email: mr@eadt.be

De Hantsetters en Verhaere NV       Trade Debt          $1,140,577
Schupstraat 21, 2018
Antwerp, Belgium
Email: info@dhv.be

Pinkusewitz diam traders ltd.       Trade Debt            $781,788
Jabotinsky 1, 5252002 Ramat Gan,
Israel
Email: office.ramatagan@pinkusewitz.com

Rosy Blue Sales Ltd.                Trade Debt            $701,202
Maccabi Building B2 1, Jabotinsky
Street Ramat Gan 52520, Israel
Email: anish.parikh@rosyblue.com

Da Trading DMCC                     Trade Debt            $673,938
P.O. Box 340591, Unit No. Almas-43-B
Almas Tower, Plot No. LT-2,
Jumeirah Lakes Towers, Dubai, U.A.E
Email: dainfo@daztrading.com

Desert Diamonds LLC                 Trade Debt            $555,456
Office No. 201, Asouk Al Kabeer Area,
Near Bank of Baroda, Meena Bazar,
Bur-Dubai
Email: desert diamonds09@gmail.com

Segaldiam Ltd.                      Trade Debt            $536,204
54 Betzalel Street, Ramat-Gan 52521
Israel
Email: segaldiam@segaldim.co.il

Minda Brothers                      Trade Debt            $434,998
Hovenierstraat 2, 2018, Antwerp,
Belgium
Email: mindabrothers@ymail.com

Kiram Gems Private Limited          Trade Debt            $400,457
DE-5011, Bharat Diamond Bourse, "G"
Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra
(East), Mumbai-400 051, India
Email: sayaji.dhane@kiragems.com

Mahendra Brothers Exports PVT, Ltd. Trade Debt            $398,893
CE-7011, 7th Floor, Tower C, G Block,
Bharat Diamond Bourse, Bandra Kurla
Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400
051, India
Email: vilas.palvankar@mahendrabrothers.com

Pradar Limited                      Trade Debt            $341,329
P.O. Box 3923364
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-9364 USA
Email: kuty@clevertech.biz

K. Girdharlal International Ltd.    Trade Debt            $304,405
1011, Prasad Chambers, Opera House,
Mumbai -400 004, India
Email: pintu@kgirdharlal.com

Mishal NV                           Trade Debt            $282,643
Hovenierstraat 2, 2018 Antwerp
Belgium
Email: secretary@mishal.be

Fishcler                            Trade Debt           $280,150
Schupstraat 21, 2018 Antwerp,
Belvium
Email: info@fishlerdiamonds.be

M. Suresh Company PVT Ltd.          Trade Debt           $268,527
419, Parekh Market, Opera House
Mumbai-400 004, Maharashtra, India
Email: hiral@msureshco.com


FIDELITY & GUARANTY: Fitch Ups IDR & Sr. Unsec. Note Rating to BB
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the 'BBB' Insurer Financial Strength
(IFS) ratings for Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company and
Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company of New York
(collectively F&G Life). Fitch has also upgraded the Issuer Default
Rating (IDR) assigned to Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc.,
(FGLH) to 'BB+' and the senior unsecured note rating to 'BB'
following completion of the acquisition. Fitch has assigned a
Stable Outlook to all ratings.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

The rating action follows the company's announcement that it has
successfully been acquired by a consortium made up primarily of the
founders of CF Corporation (CF Corp.), a special purpose
acquisition company, funds affiliated with Blackstone, and Fidelity
National Financial in an all-cash transaction valued at
approximately $1.8 billion.

The upgrade of FGLH's IDR and senior unsecured debt ratings reflect
the company's improved financial flexibility under new ownership.
Previously, FGLH's ratings reflected non-standard (i.e., wider)
notching from the IFS rating as a result of the rating and
financial profile of its highly leveraged former parent, HRG Group
Inc. (HRG; 'B' IDR). Given the absence of high leverage and more
normalized financial flexibility of the company following
completion of the transaction, FGLH's ratings were upgraded to
reflect standard notching from the IFS ratings.

Fitch's ratings for F&G Life continue to reflect the company's
relatively narrow product focus and liability profile, strong
balance sheet profile, and good operating performance. The ratings
also consider the competitive and regulatory challenges tied to the
company's strategic focus selling fixed indexed annuities (FIAs)
through independent marketing organizations (IMOs), and
macroeconomic challenges associated with low interest rates. Fitch
believes that longer term, F&G Life's credit profile could improve
based on the successful execution of the company's strategies to
improve financial performance and investment results under new
ownership.

F&G Life's strong balance sheet profile reflects the company's
strong statutory capitalization, moderate leverage, and good asset
quality. The company's year-end 2016 RBC of 412% was strong for the
rating category. F&G Life's PRISM capital model score is on the
high end of 'Adequate', which is within expectations for its
current rating category.

F&G Life's financial performance and balance sheet fundamentals
remain in line with rating expectations. Operating performance for
fiscal year 2017 was good and results have been consistent over the
past two years. Stable performance on the investment portfolio as
well as the maintenance and widening of net investment spreads,
from a combination of reducing crediting rates and asset mix
repositioning, have supported overall profitability.

Fitch expects the full implementation of the Department of Labor
(DOL) fiduciary rule will have a negative impact on the sale of
FIAs in qualified markets. While Fitch does not see this as an
immediate rating issue, the DOL rules may cause changes in
operating strategies that could impact F&G Life's risk profile and
ratings longer-term.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

The following could result in an upgrade of F&G Life's ratings:
-- The company maintains operating ROEs above 10% on a consistent

    basis and consolidated RBC above 400%;
-- Prism capital model score remains on the high end of
    'Adequate';
-- Fixed charge coverage is at least 8x and financial leverage is

    below 25%.

The following could result in a downgrade of F&G Life's ratings:
-- F&G Life's consolidated RBC ratio falling below 300% with
    operating leverage above 20x;
-- Consolidated financial leverage for F&G Life exceeding 35%;
-- Fixed charge coverage falling below 5x;
-- Operating ROE below 5% over four consecutive quarters.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company
Fidelity & Guaranty Life Insurance Company of New York
-- IFS rating at 'BBB'.

Fitch has upgraded the following ratings:

Fidelity & Guaranty Life Holdings, Inc.
-- Long-term IDR upgraded to 'BB+' from 'BB';
-- Senior unsecured note due April 2021 upgraded to 'BB' from
    'BB-'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.




FIELDPOINT PETROLEUM: Approved for Quotation on OTC Markets
-----------------------------------------------------------
FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation announced that its application for
listing and quotation of its Common Stock and Warrants on the OTC
Markets Group, Inc. has been approved.  The Company's Common Stock
has been assigned the new ticker symbol: FPPP on the OTC.QB
quotation system and the Company's Warrants have been assigned the
new ticker symbol: FPPPW on the OTC.Pink quotation system.  The
Company was expected to begin trading on Nov. 29, 2017.

                 About FieldPoint Petroleum

FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation (NYSE:FFP) acquires, operates and
develops oil and gas properties.  Its principal properties include
Block A-49, Spraberry Trend, Giddings Field, and Serbin Field,
Texas; Flying M Field, Sulimar Field, North Bilbrey Field, Lusk
Field, and Loving North Morrow Field, New Mexico; Apache Field,
Chickasha Field, and West Allen Field, Oklahoma; Longwood Field,
Louisiana; and Big Muddy Field, Wyoming.  As of Dec. 31, 2015, the
Company had varying ownership interests in 472 gross wells (113.26
net).  FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation was founded in 1980 and is
based in Austin, Texas.  For more information, please visit
www.fppcorp.com.

As of Sept. 30, 2017, FieldPoint had $7.97 million in total assets,
$6.59 million in total liabilities and $1.37 million in total
stockholders' equity.  FieldPoint reported a net loss of $2.47
million in 2016 and $10.98 million in 2015.

Hein & Associates LLP, in Dallas, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has suffered recurring
losses, and has a working capital deficit.  This, the auditors
said, raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


FORESIGHT ENERGY: Declares Dividend on Common Units
---------------------------------------------------
Foresight Energy LP issued a notice to the holders of warrants to
acquire newly issued common units of the Company disclosing that
(i) the Company paid a dividend to the holders of its common units
in an amount equal to $0.0605 per common unit, and (ii) as a result
of the payment of the Dividend, the Company adjusted the exercise
price applicable to the Warrants and number of common units
issuable upon the exercise of each Warrant, according to a Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                     About Foresight Energy

Based in Saint Louis, Missouri, Foresight Energy L.P. mines and
markets coal from reserves and operations located exclusively in
the Illinois Basin.  As of Dec. 31, 2015, the Company has invested
over $2.3 billion to construct state-of-the-art, low-cost and
highly productive mining operations and related transportation
infrastructure.  The Company controls over 3 billion tons of proven
and probable coal in the state of Illinois, which, in addition to
making the Company one of the largest reserve holders in the United
States, provides organic growth opportunities.  The Company's
reserves consist principally of three large contiguous blocks of
uniform, thick, high heat content (high Btu) thermal coal which is
ideal for highly productive long-wall operations.  Thermal coal is
used by power plants and industrial steam boilers to produce
electricity or process steam.

Foresight reported a net loss of $178.6 million in 2016 following a
net loss of $38.68 million in 2015.  As of Sept. 30, 2017,
Foresight Energy had $2.70 billion in total assets, $1.96 billion
in total liabilities and $745.95 million in total partners'
capital.


FORTY ACRE: Continental, et al., Lose Bid to Junk Trust's Claims
----------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned IN RE: QUEYROUZE, et al., SECTION: "E," Civil
Action No. 14-2715 (E.D. La.), District Judge Susie Morgan entered
an order denying Defendants Continental Casualty Company, Randall
Alfred, and Alfred, APLC's motion for summary judgment on the
negligence claims by Steve Queyrouze, Plan Trustee for the Forty
Acre Corporation Plan Trust. The Defendants' motion to strike is
also denied as moot.

The Trust filed the instant adversary complaint against Defendants
on Oct. 2, 2014. In its Amended Complaint, the Trust brings three
causes of action: (1) prebankruptcy petition malpractice, (2)
post-bankruptcy petition malpractice, and (3) breach of fiduciary
duty. Defendants seek summary judgment on the Trust's malpractice
claims based solely on the applicability of the three-year
preemptive period found in Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:5605A.
Defendants do not seek summary judgment that the claims have
prescribed even if Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:5605E, Louisiana
Civil Code 3492, and the doctrine of contra non valentem apply.

The Trust attached several exhibits to its Opposition to the motion
for summary judgment in the Bankruptcy Court, including the
affidavits of Queyrouze and Trustee Mark L. Roberts. On June 17,
2016, Defendants filed a motion in the Bankruptcy Court to strike
Queyrouze's and Roberts' affidavits, arguing the affidavits
"contain self-serving, conclusory statements about the Affiants'
lack of awareness of grounds for filing illegal malpractice claim
against Alfred" and were not provided to Defendants during the
discovery process. The Bankruptcy Court ultimately granted
Defendants' motion to strike the two affidavits. The Bankruptcy
Court also recommended this Court grant Defendants' motion for
summary judgment because all the Trust's claims had prescribed or
been preempted.

In its Objection, the Trust avers the Bankruptcy Court applied the
incorrect prescriptive period to the malpractice claims, contending
Alfred's "intentional withholding of facts . . . constitutes fraud
with[in] the meaning of La RS 9:5605E, making the preemptive
periods of 9:5605 inapplicable in favor of the one-year
prescriptive period set forth in La. C.C. art. 3492." The Trust
argues that, because Louisiana Civil Code article 3492 and the
doctrine of contra non valentem apply to the Trust's claims, the
bankruptcy court erred in dismissing its negligence claims as
untimely.

The issue before the Court is whether subsection A or E of the
Louisiana Revised Statutes 9:5605 applies. In its opinion, the
Bankruptcy Court held that subsection A applies based on that
court's assumption that, to plead fraud, the Trust had to
specifically allege Defendants' actions amounted to "fraud" in
their complaint. Whether a plaintiff makes out a claim for fraud,
however, does not depend on whether the actions are referred to as
"fraud," but rather on the underlying facts alleged. "Fraud can be
averred by specifically alleging fraud, or by alleging facts that
necessarily constitute fraud even if the term 'fraud' is not used."
The Bankruptcy Court failed to engage in an analysis of whether the
facts alleged would support a claim for fraud. Because the
Bankruptcy Court concluded that subsection A applied to the Trust's
malpractice claims, the Bankruptcy Court held that the complaint
was prescribed on its face, and shifted the burden to the Trust to
show that the claims had not prescribed.

The Court finds that the proper analysis is for the Court to
determine whether the underlying facts alleged by the Trust make
out a claim for fraud. The Trust's complaint clearly makes out a
claim that Alfred committed a fraud by silence. In this case, the
Court finds the Trust alleged the requisite elements of fraud with
sufficient particularity, notwithstanding its failure to
specifically refer to Alfred's actions as fraud in the amended
complaint. The Court finds that subsection E is applicable to the
Trust's two malpractice claims.

In their motion for summary judgment, Defendants seek dismissal of
"all" of the Trust's claims, but base their argument with respect
to the negligence claims entirely on Louisiana Revised Statutes
9:5605A, and do not even seek summary judgment on the Trust's
breach of fiduciary duty claim. Because Louisiana Revised Statutes
9:5605E applies, the Defendants are not entitled to summary
judgment that the negligence claims are preempted under subsection
A.

A full-text copy of Judge Morgan's Order dated Nov. 8, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/eEsMs3 from Leagle.com.

Steve Queyrouze, Plaintiff, represented by Scott David Webre, Webre
& Associates.

Randall M Alfred, Defendant, represented by William Everard Wright,
Jr. -- wwright@deutschkerrigan.com -- Deutsch Kerrigan LLP &
Charlotte Collins Meade, Cardone Law Firm.

Randall M. Alfred, APLC, Defendant, represented by William Everard
Wright, Jr., Deutsch Kerrigan LLP & Charlotte Collins Meade,
Cardone Law Firm.

Continental Casualty Company, Defendant, represented by David
Scranton Daly, Frilot L.L.C., Charlotte Collins Meade, Cardone Law
Firm & William Everard Wright, Jr., Deutsch Kerrigan LLP.

                       About Forty Acre

Forty Acre Corporation, based in Houma, Louisiana, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 11-10074) on
January 11, 2011.  Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth W. Magner presides
over the case.  Randall M. Alfred, Esq. -- rmaaplc@bellsouth.net --
served as the Debtor's counsel.  In its petition, Forty Acre
estimated $1 million to $10 million in both assets and liabilities.
The petition was signed by Mike LeBlanc, president.

The order confirming Forty Acre's plan directed the Debtor to
transfer certain assets, including the Terrebonne Parish land and
Forty Acre's causes of action, to The Forty Acre Corporation Plan
Trust.


GEK REALTY: Taps Pick & Zabicki as New Legal Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
GEK Realty And Home Improvement LLC seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to hire Pick
& Zabicki LLP as its new legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; analyze claims of creditors; assist in the
preparation of a plan of reorganization; and provide other legal
services related to its Chapter 11 case.  Pick & Zabicki will
replace Arlene Gordon-Oliver & Associates, PLLC.

The firm's hourly rates are:

     Partners       $350 - $425
     Associates            $250
     Paraprofessionals     $125   

Pick & Zabicki is a "disinterested person" as defined in section
101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code, according to court filings.

The firm can be reached through:

     Douglas J. Pick, Esq.
     Eric C. Zabicki, Esq.
     Pick & Zabicki LLP
     369 Lexington Avenue, 12th Floor
     New York, NY 10017
     Phone: (212) 695-6000
     Email: dpick@picklaw.net

              About GEK Realty and Home Improvement

GEK Realty and Home Improvement LLC, based in Saint Albans, New
York, is a partnership that owns a two-family residential property
located at 403 Jefferson Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, and a
single-family residential property at 2750 Pearsall Avenue, Bronx,
New York.

GEK Realty filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. Case No.
17-40228) on Jan. 19, 2017.  The Hon. Nancy Hershey Lord presides
over the case.

In its petition, the Debtor estimates $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Gregory
Carmichael, its managing member.

On August 29, 2017, BHMPW Funding LLC, a secured creditor, filed a
disclosure statement, which explains its proposed plan of
reorganization for the Debtor.


GEORGIA ANESTHESIA: Hires Morris Manning as Special Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Northeast Georgia Anesthesia Services, Inc. its affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Georgia to hire Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP as special counsel
to handle the appeal of a Medicare audit.

On November 16, 2017, at the hearing on First Day Motions, the
Court heard Northeast's Motion for Order Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Sections 105(a) and 363 Authorizing Debtor to Honor Certain
Petition Obligation, which was orally approved by the Court at the
conclusion of the hearing. The Court is awaiting submission of an
order approving the same.

As stated in the Critical Vendor Motion and by counsel for
Northeast at the Hearing, in the course of Northeast's businesses,
and as is customary with many medical businesses involved in pain
management, Northeast is subject to Medicare audits. Northeast has
been subject to an Audit for over a year. The Audit resulted in a
finding by Medicare that Northeast must repay certain payments
received from Medicare. The Audit is on appeal for purposes of
determining the precise amount owed by Northeast to Medicare.
Medicare currently asserts that approximately $11,000,000.00 must
be repaid to it by Northeast. Northeast disputes this amount.

Morris Manning estimates that the total fees over the next two
years would be approximately $250,000.00, for which Northeast would
be responsible for approximately $75,000.00.

The firm's standard hourly rates are:

     Robert Threlkeld    $475
     Seslee Smith        $450
     Edgar Bueno         $450
     Elliott Coward      $365
     Josh Kirschner      $250
     David W. Cranshaw   $560
     Darlene Hill-Parks  $185

David W. Cranshaw, Esq., a Partner at Morris Manning & Martin, LLP,
attests that neither his firm nor its partners or other attorneys
are directors, officers, equity security holders, partners, general
partners, mangers, members, persons or entities in control of
Northeast Georgia Anesthesia Services, Inc.; and neither his firm
nor its partners hold or represent any interests that are adverse
to Petitioner or the Estate.

The Special Counsel can be reached through:

     David W. Cranshaw, Esq.
     Morris Manning & Martin, LLP
     1600 Atlanta Financial Center
     3343 Peachtree Road, NE
     Atlanta, GA 30326
     Phone: 404.504.7605
     Fax: 404.365.9532
     Email: dcranshaw@mmmlaw.com

                         About 24 Amherst

24 Amherst, LLC and its affiliates filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-22188) on Nov. 14, 2017.
Janene D. Holladay, its member, signed the petitions.  The Hon.
James R. Sacca presides over these cases.

24 Amherst, LLC, is a real estate company based in Winder, Georgia.
Northeast Georgia Anesthesia Services Inc. is a medical group
specializing in interventional pain management, anesthesiology,
pain management, addiction medicine, physical medicine and
rehabilitation.

Holladay Holdings has its principal place of business located at
984 Old Forge Lane, Jefferson, Jackson County, Georgia.  Holladay
Holdings owns three pieces of commercial real property, located at
these addresses: (1) 1503 Professional Court, Dalton, Georgia
("Dalton Property"); (2) 1620 Prince Avenue, Athens, Georgia
("Athens Property"); and (3) 1638 Prince Avenue, Athens, Georgia
("HQ Property").

Holladay Holdings rents the Dalton and Athens Property to
Northeast, which operates a pain and recovery practice in each of
the properties.  Holladay Holdings rents the HQ Property to
Northeast, where Northeast's headquarters is presently located.

The Debtors are represented by Anna Mari Humnicky, Esq., at Cohen
Pollock Merlin & Small, P.C.  J. Allen Sermour, CPA PC, serves as
the Debtors' accountant.


GIGAMON INC: Fitch Assigns First-Time 'B' IDR; Outlook Stable
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a first-time 'B' Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) to Gigamon, Inc.  The Rating Outlook is
Stable.  Fitch has also assigned first-time ratings to the $50
million first-lien secured revolving credit facility (RCF) and $400
million first-lien secured term loan of 'BB-'/'RR2'; and a
'CCC+'/'RR6' rating to the $150 million second-lien secured term
loan.  The proceeds, along with equity contribution from Elliott
Management, a multi-strategy private investment firm, and cash on
the balance sheet will be used to fund the $1.6 billion acquisition
that was announced on Oct. 26, 2017.  Elliott's investment is being
led by its private equity affiliate, Evergreen Coast Capital.
Fitch's rating actions affect $600 million total debt, including
the $50 million RCF.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Market Leader: Gigamon is a market leader in the Network Packet
Broker (NPB) segment with over 35% market share, more than the
combined market share of the next two largest competitors. Since
2014, Gigamon's market position has strengthened, with market share
rising by approximately 10 percentage points. Fitch believes the
growing market share demonstrates Gigamon's focus and expertise in
the NPB segment.

Limited Revenue Scale: Given the niche nature of NPB, Gigamon's
revenue scale is small relative to other IT networking and security
peers. This could lead to greater volatility in revenues and
profits; but, given the niche nature of the segment, Fitch does not
anticipate meaningful increase in scale through Fitch forecast
period. Despite the small revenue scale, Gigamon has historically
maintained high renewal rates, which should provide greater revenue
visibility for the company.

Rising network complexity supports secular growth: Increasing
enterprise network complexity and data speeds are driving demand
for capabilities that enable full network traffic visibility.
Enterprise migration to hybrid cloud is adding additional
complexity in full visibility into the end-to-end network.
Gigamon's ability to provide visibility across both on-premise
networks and cloud infrastructure offers the capabilities required
by its enterprise customers. Gigamon partners with network
infrastructure providers including network equipment, cloud
services, and network monitoring tools; the broad set of
partnerships offer compatibilities in wide-ranging enterprise
network environments.

Susceptible to Industry Cyclicality: Gigamon is susceptible to IT
security industry cycles as demonstrated by its weak 2017 revenue
growth. Fitch believes the weakness may have been a result of
extraordinarily strong growth in the previous two years coinciding
with heightened IT security awareness that propelled overall
industry growth. Fitch view the current industry environment as
normal and a more realistic base for assessing future growth
potential. Nevertheless, Gigamon's narrowly focused product
expertise will continue to expose the company to industry
cyclicality.

High Leverage: Pro forma for cost savings and the leveraged buyout
by Evergreen Coast Capital Corp, gross leverage will be at 6.8x in
2018, in line with its peers in the 'B' rating category. In
addition to the debt issuance, affiliates of Evergreen will be
making an $839 million equity contribution; Fitch believes this
demonstrates Evergreen's commitment and confidence in the industry
and Gigamon.

SUMMARY

Fitch's ratings on Gigamon are supported by the company's leading
position in the NPB segment with over 35% market share, more than
the combined market share of the next two largest competitors; NPB
provides network traffic visibility for enterprises for management
of IT networks and security. While Fitch expects the increasing
complexity of enterprise networks will serve as the underlying
demand driver for the segment, the niche nature of the NPB segment
limits upside for Gigamon's revenue scale. Gigamon's focus on NPB
technologies and products, and the relatively small revenue scale
expose the company to the industry cyclicality that is inherent to
the IT security industry. Despite the cyclicality, Fitch believes
Gigamon's EBITDA margins will remain relatively stable given its
industry leadership.

The announced $1.6 billion acquisition by Evergreen will be
financed with $550 million in term loans, equity contribution from
affiliates of Evergreen, and cash on the balance sheet at closing.
Fitch forecasts Gigamon's gross leverage in 2018 to be 6.8x,
gradually declining to approximately 5x by 2020. Gigamon's industry
leadership, revenue scale, and leverage profile are consistent with
the 'B' rating category.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within Fitch rating case for the issuer
include:
-- Revenue growth in the high single digits;
-- EBITDA margins approximately 25% after completion of cost
    reduction measures;
-- Capex at approximately 3% of revenue;
-- No dividend payment through Fitch forecast period;
-- FCF generated used for debt repayment.

-- Recovery analysis assumes a going-concern EBITDA that is
approximately 15% lower relative to LTM EBITDA assuming a
combination of revenue decline and margin compression in a distress
scenario when enterprise customers may elect to move to an
alternate supplier due to the uncertainties surrounding a
distressed supplier; the reduced scale would result in weaker
margins. Fitch applies a 6.5x multiple to arrive at an enterprise
value (EV) of $445 million. The multiple is higher than the median
TMT EV multiple, but is in line with other similar companies that
exhibit strong FCF characteristics. In thirteenth edition of
Bankruptcy Enterprise Values and Creditor Recoveries case study,
Fitch notes seven past reorganizations in the Technology sector,
where the median recovery multiple was 4.9x. Of these companies,
only two were in the software sub-sector with high recurring
revenue characteristics: Allen Systems Group, Inc. and Aspect
Software Parent, Inc., which received recovery multiples of 8.4x
and 5.5x, respectively. Gigamon's operating profile is supportive
of a recovery multiple in the middle of this range.

-- Fitch assumes a fully drawn revolver in its recovery analysis.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action:
-- Gross leverage sustained below 5.5x;
-- FCF margins sustained above 10%;
-- Organic revenue growth sustained near or above 5%.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action:
-- Gross leverage sustained above 7x;
-- FCF margins sustained below 5%;
-- Organic revenue growth sustained near or below 0%.

LIQUIDITY

Fitch expects the company's liquidity to remain solid over the
forecast period. Pro forma for the transaction, liquidity will be
supported by internal FCF generation, a new $50 million RCF, and
$25 million of readily available cash and cash equivalents
post-closing. Gigamon's FCF is supported by normalized EBITDA
margins of approximately 25%; Fitch estimates FCF margins of nearly
10% after the completion of expected cost reductions resulting in
over $35 million of annual FCF generation.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned the following ratings:

Gigamon, Inc.
-- Long-Term Issuer Default Rating 'B'; Outlook Stable;
-- $50 milion first-lien secured revolving credit facility at
    'BB-/RR2';
-- $400 million first-lien secured term loan at 'BB-/RR2';
-- $150 million second-lien secured term loan at 'CCC+/RR6'.

Gigamon Inc. designs, develops and sells products and services that
together provide customers visibility and control of network
traffic.  The Company serves global enterprises, governments and
service providers that seek to maintain and improve the security,
reliability and performance of their network infrastructure.


GIGAMON INC: Moody's Assigns B3 CFR; Outlook Positive
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B3 Corporate Family Rating to
Gigamon Inc. Moody's also assigned a B2 rating to its first lien
debt and Caa2 rating to its second lien debt. The debt will be used
to finance the acquisition of Gigamon by affiliates of Evergreen
Coast Capital. The ratings outlook is positive.

Ratings Rationale

The B3 Corporate Family Rating is driven by the very high leverage
at closing and recent revenue declines. The rating also considers
the very strong market position Gigamon has built in the network
packet broker (NPB) market with a strong suite of network
visibility products for large enterprises. The NPB market is a
growing market but evolving rapidly to address changing network
architectures and growth in cloud based applications, tools and
infrastructure. Leverage at closing is estimated at over 7x pro
forma for proposed cost reductions and over 10x excluding those
reductions. Pro forma free cash flow at closing is estimated at
breakeven or below but expected to be modestly positive within
12-18 months. The ratings also consider the company's reliance on a
relatively narrow product line and relatively short history at its
current scale. [While the company generates approximately one third
of its revenue from predictable maintenance revenues, most rated
software peers generate 50% or greater of their revenue from
maintenance].

The positive ratings outlook reflects the potential that the
company will return to growth and start to generate healthy levels
of free cash flow. The ratings could be upgraded if the company
returns to mid-single digit or greater growth and drives free cash
flow to debt to greater than 5% and leverage under 6.75x (or cash
EBITDA based leverage under 5.75x). The ratings could be downgraded
if free cash flow is negative and leverage exceeds 8x on other than
a temporary basis.

Liquidity is good based approximately $25 million of cash at
closing, expected positive free cash flow and an undrawn $50
million revolver.

Assignments:

Issuer: Gigamon Inc.

-- Probability of Default Rating, Assigned B3-PD

-- Corporate Family Rating, Assigned B3

-- Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned B2 (LGD3)

-- Senior Secured Bank Credit Facility, Assigned Caa2 (LGD5)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Gigamon Inc.

-- Outlook, Assigned Positive

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Software
Industry published in December 2015.

Gigamon Inc. is a leading provider of network visibility software
and appliances. The company, headquartered in Santa Clara, CA, had
revenues of $303 million for the twelve months ended September 30,
2017.



GNC HOLDINGS: Fitch Cuts IDR to B on Revised Financing Proposal
---------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has downgraded GNC Holdings, Inc.'s Issuer Default
Rating (IDR) to 'B', downgraded its proposed Asset-Backed Loan
(ABL) Revolver to 'BB'/'RR1' and has assigned a 'BB-'/'RR2' rating
to the company's newly proposed $300 million B-1 term loan and $905
million B-2 term loans due 2020 and 2021, respectively. The term
loans, which are expected to be used to refinance the company's
existing term loan, replace the company's Nov. 8, 2017 proposal to
refinance its existing term loan with a mix of term loans ($705
million) and secured notes ($500 million), both due 2022. The
proposed ABL amount of $100 million remains the same. While the
total principal issuance remains the same as the prior proposal,
notable updates include shorter maturities than the original plan
and an anticipated higher fixed obligation burden due to higher
interest expense and a more aggressive amortization schedule. The
Rating Outlook is Stable.

The downgrade reflects the material difference in structure
proposed by the company relative to its initial refinancing
proposal, which both heightens near-term refinancing risk and
increases projected fixed obligation burdens. GNC's inability to
successfully complete the refinancing as proposed and address
upcoming debt maturities in a timely fashion would be a rating
concern.

The ratings continue to reflect GNC's leading position in the
growing health and wellness products market. The rating considers
recent market share declines, driven by encroaching competition and
executional missteps, which in concert with recent financial policy
decisions, have weakened the company's leverage profile. However,
the rating also reflects steps the company has made to reverse
operational declines and reduce leverage, through diverting FCF
towards debt paydown and suspending dividends and share buybacks.

Fitch expects total revenue to remain fairly stable in the $2.5
billion range between 2017 and 2020 and EBITDA is expected to
trough in the mid-$200 million range in 2017, versus $350 million
in 2016 and the average $500 million range between 2012 and 2015.
EBITDA is expected to improve to the $300 million to $325 million
range by 2019/2020 on modest top line growth and gross margin
expansion as a result of store closings leading to reduced
occupancy costs and merchandise margin stabilization. Confidence in
the company's ability to stabilize EBITDA in the near term has
heightened significance given the need for GNC to address
approximately $600 million of debt due in 2020.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Refinancing Proposal Imposes Structural Changes: GNC's updated
refinancing proposal on Nov. 27, 2017 included structural
differences that Fitch views to have a negative impact on the
company's credit profile relative to the originally proposed terms.
Revised terms include shorter maturities and an anticipated higher
fixed obligation burden through increased pricing and annual
amortization payments, which together place increased urgency on
the company's ongoing turnaround efforts.

Compared to the original refinancing proposal, Fitch expects annual
fixed obligations in 2018 and 2019 to increase around $50 million
via higher interest expense and term loan amortization. In 2020,
the company will need to address both its remaining Term Loan B-1
principal (approximately $240 million) and the existing $288
million of convertible notes, in addition to around $45 million of
Term Loan B-2 amortization. The previously proposed term loan and
notes matured in 2022. Fitch previously forecasted that the company
could address its 2020 convertible notes maturity with internally
generated cash of around $100 million per year but will now need to
address around $600 million of maturities in 2020. GNC could
address these additional maturities through refinancing or through
asset sales or accelerated refranchising activity.

Good Position in a Growing Category: GNC is a leading U.S. retailer
and manufacturer (with around 6% share) of health and wellness
products, including vitamins, minerals and herbal supplements
(VMHS), and sports nutrition and diet products. Historically, the
company has benefited from stable growth in the VMHS industry,
brand leadership, and its broad store footprint and brand presence
in the U.S. and internationally. The company has 9,083 stores
globally as of September 2017 and manufactures product sold in
retailers across the food, drug, and discount category. The company
has outsized presence at Rite Aid Corporation stores through a
partnership and a storefront on Amazon.com. Overall online sales
penetration is around 10%, in line with industry averages. GNC's
brand leadership is evident with nearly half of consolidated
revenue derived from owned-brand product.

The approximately $40 billion VMHS industry has proven to be
recession resistant by growing at a mid-single digit rate through
economic cycles. The consumable nature of the products and high
frequency of usage as part of regular dietary regimens drive the
stability and defensibility of the business. Given an aging U.S.
population and increased consumer focus on personal health and
wellness, Fitch expects the VMHS industry to continue mid-single
digit growth over the next several years, making it one of the
faster growing segments within retail.

Historically, the standalone vitamin retail business has been
resilient to channel disruption from discount and online players
for several reasons. First, inventory breadth in the category is
significant, which is an unappealing characteristic for discount
players that prefer a focused, high-turning inventory mix. Second,
the nature of the industry's product requires an elevated service
component. GNC, whose service model provides product and regimen
guidance to less knowledgeable customers, has benefited from this
information asymmetry. Finally, loyalty programs have proven
effective for standalone players to maintain share in the space,
with GNC's (now-replaced) Gold Card discount program generating
nearly 80% of company sales.

Recent Weakness: Despite good historical fundamentals, GNC's
operating trajectory turned in 2014, with sales declining from a
peak of $2.6 billion in 2013 to an expected $2.5 billion in 2017,
while EBITDA has been halved from around $530 million in 2013 to an
expected $260 million in 2017. While the category has continued its
growth trajectory, the alternate channels appear to be taking share
from standalone players such as GNC. The proliferation of
vitamin-related information online coupled with an increased
vitamin focus by a number of competitors in the discount, grocery,
drug retail and online spaces have limited GNC's competitive
advantage in recent years.

Fitch believes GNC was also impacted by operational missteps in
recent years. The company's marketing and merchandising efforts
have historically appealed to sports-related products such as
muscle-gain proteins, while industry growth has focused more around
natural/organic supplements, particularly for the growing baby
boomer population. In addition, while the company's Gold Card
loyalty program was a historical advantage, the loyalty scheme more
recently created price confusion amongst consumers who increasingly
value price transparency. In addition, the pricing structure was
misaligned in the company's stores relative to its online channel,
where products were heavily discounted.

EBITDA declines in recent years have outpaced revenue moderation
due to the deleveraging impact on fixed expenses such as rent and
store payroll as well as the company's decisions to maintain
investments in marketing and product innovation. More recently,
margins have declined due to the company's concerted efforts to
reduce prices in an increasingly competitive environment and to
align pricing across its channels and simplify its pricing model
for loyalty card customers. EBITDA erosion has caused the company's
leverage profile to weaken, with adjusted debt/EBITDAR forecasted
to rise from the mid-4.0x range in 2013 to around 7.0x in 2017.
This increase was exacerbated by the company's decision to execute
debt-financed share buybacks in 2015 and 1H 2016; outstanding debt
balances increased around $300 million from the beginning of 2015
until the company ceased share buybacks in mid-2016.

EBITDA Expected to Trough in 2017: Over the past 18 months, GNC has
implemented a number of strategic changes that could stabilize
results while improving the company's leverage profile. The company
has reduced prices to be more competitive and aligned price points
across channels to reduce customer confusion. GNC replaced its
existing loyalty program, where a paid membership provided ongoing
product discounts. The new loyalty program includes both a free
tier where customers can earn rewards based on spending, and a paid
tier with additional benefits. The goal of the new free tier is to
drive higher program enrollees while improving ongoing product
margins. Research and development investments have been geared
toward enhanced product innovation to drive customer excitement and
brand differentiation. Sales staff re-training is designed to
fortify the company's ability to effectively counsel and advise
customers.

GNC's efforts have shown some key signs of improvement, with
average transactions improving from negative in 2015-2016 to up
over 10% through the first three quarters of 2017 and positive
enrollment trends for the company's new loyalty program (nine
million members in the free tier and 600,000 members in the paid
tier as of October 2017). Comparable store sales (comps) were 1.3%
in 3Q 2017, the company's first positive comp since 4Q 2015, and
are expected to be positive in 4Q and annually beginning 2018.

While sales have shown some evidence of stabilization, GNC's
initiatives have had a negative impact on EBITDA. Price reductions
have reduced gross margin by over 200 bps to 33% through the first
three quarters of 2017, while the elimination of the paid loyalty
program has caused significant declines in high-margin membership
fee revenue. EBITDA, which was $350 million in 2016, could decline
to around $260 million in 2017, with quarterly declines YTD through
3Q but flattish EBITDA in 4Q.

Despite recent trends and increased competition from alternate
channels, Fitch believes there is long-term viability in the
standalone vitamin retail space and that GNC's size, positive free
cash flow (FCF) generation, brand recognition and vertical
manufacturing capabilities are assets that could allow it to defend
share longer-term should its recently enacted strategies be
successful. As the company laps significant changes made in 2017,
the continuation of modestly comps could yield EBITDA trending
above the $300 million level over the next three years.

New Financial Policy and FCF Supports Deleveraging: As GNC
undertakes these initiatives, the company has also made significant
changes to its cash deployment strategies. Over the past 18 months,
the company has eliminated both its dividend and share buyback
program, and redirected its FCF to debt paydown, repaying nearly
$200 million of debt from 2Q 2016 through 3Q 2017. The company's
net leverage target of 3x, capitalizing leases at 5x, equates to 4x
Fitch-defined leverage (capitalizing leases at 8x) assuming minimal
cash balances for both calculations. Assuming the company continues
to direct FCF toward debt paydown in concert with its stated
financial policy, leverage could approach mid-5.0x in 2020 based on
around $200 million of FCF in 2017 and $100 million in FCF annually
beginning 2018.

RECOVERY CONSIDERATIONS

Current Recovery Considerations: Fitch's recovery analysis is based
on a going concern value of $1.25 billion, versus approximately
$630 million from an orderly liquidation of assets, which are
composed primarily of inventory, receivables and owned property and
equipment. Post-default EBITDA was estimated at $250 million,
similar to the company's trailing 12 month EBITDA. Fitch believes
current operating results represent a potential post-bankruptcy
scenario following an approximately 50% decline in EBITDA over the
past three years. The analysis uses a 5.0x enterprise value/EBITDA
multiple, consistent with the 5.4x median multiple for retail going
concern reorganization but at the low end of the 12-year retail
market multiples of 5x to 11x, and below 7x-12x for retail
transaction multiples. The multiple considers GNC's historically
strong position in a good category, recent competitive encroachment
by alternate channels and operational missteps.

After deducting 10% for administrative claims, the remaining $1.125
billion would lead to outstanding recovery prospects (91%-100%) for
the senior secured revolver, which is secured the company's
receivables and inventory. The revolver is therefore rated
'BB/RR1'. The new secured term loans are pari passu, and have a
second lien on revolver collateral and a first lien on other
remaining company assets including intellectual property. These
securities would have superior recovery prospects (71%-90%) and are
therefore rated 'BB-'/'RR2'.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

The downgrade reflects the material difference in structure
proposed by the company relative to its initial refinancing
proposal, which both heightens near term refinancing risk and
increases projected fixed obligation burdens. The inability of GNC
to successfully complete the refinancing as proposed and address
upcoming debt maturities in a timely fashion would be a rating
concern.

The ratings continue to reflect GNC's leading position in the
growing health and wellness products market. The rating considers
recent market share declines, driven by encroaching competition and
executional missteps, which in concert with recent financial policy
decisions, have weakened the company's leverage profile. However,
the rating also reflects steps the company has made to reverse
operational declines and reduce leverage, through diverting FCF
towards debt paydown and suspending dividends and share buybacks.

GNC is rated similarly to SUPERVALU Inc. (B/Stable) and Rite Aid
Corporation (B/Stable). SUPERVALU is a secularly challenged grocery
retailer and wholesale grocery operator, with leverage around 4.0x.
Rite Aid Corporation (B/Stable) is a drug retailer whose recent
market share losses raise questions around EBITDA stabilization
prospects; its pro forma leverage following the sale of assets to
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. is projected to trend around 7.0x.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within Fitch rating case for the issuer
include:
-- Fitch expects total revenue to remain fairly stable in the
    $2.5 billion range between 2016 and 2020. Revenue is expected
    to decline 3% in 2017 and decline 1% in 2018 due to store
    closings before turning modestly positive in the low single
    digit range. Same store sales are expected to be flat in 2017
    given second half improvement and grow in the low single digit

    range in 2018-2020.
-- EBITDA is expected to trough in the mid-$200 million range in
    2017, versus $350 million in 2016 and the average $500 million

    range between 2012 and 2015. EBITDA is expected to improve to
    the $300 million to $325 million range by 2019/2020 on modest
    top line growth and gross margin expansion as a result of
    store closings leading to reduced occupancy costs and
    merchandise margin stabilization.
-- FCF is expected to be $200 million in 2017, partly driven by
    working capital improvement of $75 million, and $100 million
    annually thereafter. The company has suspended both its
    dividend and share buybacks. Fitch would expect the company to

    use FCF towards debt paydown, including term loan
    amortization.
-- GNC is projected to have approximately $725 million in
    maturities and/or amortization payments due by the end of 2020

    between the $300 million Term Loan B-1 maturing in January
    2020, $288 million in convertible notes maturing in August
    2020, and $45 million in annual amortization payments due for
    the B-2 Term Loan. Fitch expects GNC to address these
    maturities through a combination of internally-generated FCF,
    refinancing and/or tender of the term loan and converts
    (respectively), and a possible asset sale or sale-leaseback
    transaction for incremental proceeds.
-- Adjusted leverage (capitalizing rent expense at 8x) is
    projected at 7x for 2017, versus the 4.5x-5x range in 2013-
    2015, but is expected to trend towards the mid-5x by 2020
    based on EBITDA growth and debt reduction.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action
-- Increased confidence in the company's ability to increase
    EBITDA to the $300 million range while paying down debt such
    that leverage trends to the mid-5x, as well as the company's
    ability to successfully address upcoming maturities.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action
-- Lack of expected sales improvement and debt paydown such that
    leverage remains elevated near current levels and/or the
    inability of GNC to successfully complete the refinancing as
    proposed and address upcoming debt maturities in a timely
    fashion.

LIQUIDITY

GNC's proposed transaction includes the refinancing of its existing
senior secured credit facilities, replacing it with a new $100
million ABL Revolver due 2022, and two tranches of term loan: a
$300 million tranche due January 2020 (Term Loan B-1) and a $905
million tranche due January 2021 (Term Loan B-2).

This proposed capital structure differs from GNC's initial proposal
on Nov. 8, 2017, which included a $705 million Term Loan B due 2022
and $500 million in senior secured notes also due 2022. The change
in mix and maturities from the initial proposal is a result of
evolving market conditions and demand. In issuing its new capital
structure, GNC is redeeming its $300 million revolver due 2018 (of
which $48 million was drawn) and its $1.131 billion Term Loan due
2019. The company is not refinancing the $288 million in
outstanding convertible bonds due 2020 which has a favorable 1.5%
coupon. Fitch does not rate these convertibles given the company
does not release public documentation on the issue.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has downgraded the following ratings for GNC:

GNC Holdings, Inc.
-- Long-Term IDR to 'B' from 'B+'.

General Nutrition Centers, Inc.
-- Long-Term IDR to 'B' from 'B+';
-- Proposed senior secured $100 million ABL to 'BB'/'RR1' from
    'BB+'/'RR1'.

Fitch has assigned the following ratings to GNC:

General Nutrition Centers, Inc.
-- Proposed senior secured term loans B1 and B2 'BB-'/'RR2'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

GNC Holdings Inc. is a Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania-based American
commercial enterprise focused on the retail sale of health and
nutrition related products, including vitamins, supplements,
minerals, herbs, sports nutrition, diet, and energy products.


GORDMANS STORES: Liquidation Plan Declared Effective
----------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Gordmans Stores' Joint Plan of
Liquidation became effective, and the Company emerged from Chapter
11 protection. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plan on
October 18, 2017. BankruptcyData's detailed Plan Summary notes,
"The Plan contemplates a liquidation of each of the Debtors and
their Estates and is therefore referred to as a 'plan of
liquidation.' The primary objective of the Plan is to maximize the
value of recoveries to all Holders of Allowed Claims and Allowed
Interests and to distribute all property of the Estates that is or
becomes available for distribution generally in accordance with the
priorities established by the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors believe
that the Plan accomplishes this objective and is in the best
interest of the Estates and therefore seek to confirm the Plan."
BankruptcyData's Plan Summary continues, "General Unsecured Claims
will receive its pro rata share of cash from the Plan Administrator
Assets available to satisfy the General Unsecured Claims, if the
Allowed Class 4 Claim is held by a Holder that votes to accept the
Plan, for a rate of recovery of 4.9%--10.6%."

                     About Gordmans Stores

Gordmans Stores, Inc. -- http://www.gordmans.com/-- was a retail
company engaged in the sale of apparel, home goods, and other
merchandise.  Founded in 1915, Gordmans operates 106 stores in 62
markets and 22 states throughout the United States and through
e-commerce operations.

Gordmans Stores, and five of its affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Neb. Lead Case No.
17-80304) on March 13, 2017.  Andrew T. Hall, president, CEO and
secretary, signed the petitions.  At the time of the filing, the
Debtors disclosed $274 million in assets and $131 million in
liabilities.

The cases are assigned to Judge Thomas L. Saladino.

The Debtors engaged Patrick J. Nash, Jr., Esq., Brad Weiland, Esq.,
and Jamie R. Netznik, Esq., of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, as bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtors also hired Joyce A. Dixon, Esq., at Kutak
Rock LLP as local counsel; Duff & Phelps as financial advisor;
Clear Thinking Group LLC as restructuring advisor; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions LLC, as claims and noticing agent.

On March 15, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee hired
Frost Brown Todd LLC, as counsel, Brian J. Koenig, Esq. at Koley
Jessen, P.C., L.L.O., as local counsel; and Province Inc., as
financial advisor.

                          *     *     *

Houston, Texas-based Stage Stores and a joint venture of
liquidators Tiger Capital Group and Great American Group were
declared winning bidders for Gordmans' assets at an auction in
March 2017.  Stage Stores said at that time it plans to operate at
least 50 of Gordmans' 105 locations and keep the warehouse in Omaha
as a going concern.

Stage operates about 800 locations nationwide under the Peebles,
Bealls and Goody's brands, among others.

The winning bid amounted to $75.6 million, good enough to snare
Gordmans' inventory at all stores, its fixtures, furniture, office
equipment and other assets, according to a report by the Omaha
World-Herald.

Gordmans Stores changed its name to G-Estate Liquidation Stores,
Inc., following the asset sale.


H3C INC: Hires Ackerman Fox as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
H3C, Inc. d/b/a Left Coast Kitchen & Cocktails, seeks authority
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
to employ Ackerman Fox, LLP as Chapter 11 counsel.

The professional services to be rendered by Ackerman Fox are:

     (a) represent the Debtor, as debtor-in-possession, to prepare
and file a chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and schedules, all
necessary motions, applications, answers, orders, monthly reports
and other necessary and appropriate documents in connection with
the administration of the Debtor's estate;

     (b) prepare and file all necessary adversary proceedings and
documents in connection with adversary proceedings and other
papers;

     (c) advise the Debtor with respect to its powers and duties as
a debtor and debtor-in-possession in the continued management and
operation of his financial affairs;

     (d) appear at all appropriate meetings before this Court, any
appellate courts, and the U.S. Trustee, and protect the interests
of the Debtor's estate before such courts and the U.S. Trustee;

     (e) represent the Debtor in actions to protect and preserve
the Debtor's estate, including the prosecution of actions on its
behalf, the defense of any actions commenced against the estate,
negotiations concerning all litigation in which the Debtor may be
involved and object to claims filed against the estate;

     (f) assist the Debtor in formulating and negotiating a plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement; and

     (g) perform such other further legal services to the Debtor
which may be necessary.

Neil H. Ackerman, Esq., member of the firm of Ackerman Fox, LLP,
attests that his firm is a "disinterested person" as that term is
defined in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101(14), and Ackerman Fox does not hold,
or represent any entity with an adverse interest in or in
connection with this case.

The Firm's Neil Ackerman charges $475 per hour for his service.
Other partners and of counsel charge $425 an hour while associates
charge $350.  The firm charges $125 an hour for all work done by
paralegals or legal assistants.

The Firm can be reached through:

     Neil H. Ackerman, Esq.
     Kamini Fox, Esq.
     ACKERMAN FOX, LLP
     90 Merrick Ave., Suite 400
     East Meadow, NY 11554
     Telephone: (516) 493-9920
     Facsimile: (516) 228-3396
     Email: nackerman@ackermanfox.com
            kfox@ackermanfox.com

                        About H3C, Inc.

Based in Merrick, New York, H3C, Inc. d/b/a Left Coast Kitchen &
Cocktails filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 16-77027) on November 14, 2017, listing under $1 million
both in assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is represented by Neil
H Ackerman at Ackerman Fox, LLP as counsel.


HARTFORD COURT: Latest Plan Discloses Settlement with the Wejdas
----------------------------------------------------------------
Hartford Court Development, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Northern District of Illinois a second amended
disclosure statement in conjunction with its second amended plan of
reorganization dated Nov. 10, 2017.

The second amended plan provides that the percentage paid on
general unsecured claims will depend on the resolution of an
objection to a claim filed by creditors Ewa and Dariusz Wejda in
the amount of $3,401,734.26. The Debtor has reached an agreement
with the Wejdas for the allowance of their claim in the amount of
$121,815. At the time of the filing of this Disclosure Statement,
the Debtor's motion to approve the settlement of the Wejda claim
was still pending in court.

Including the Wejda claim in the reduced amount, the total of
general unsecured claims is $243,630. If the settlement of the
Wejda claim is allowed by the Court, the distribution to general
unsecured claims will be approximately 15%. The Debtor expects that
the settlement with the Wejdas will be approved before the
Effective Date of the Plan.

The Debtor will pay the priority claim of the Internal Revenue
Service, in the amount of $116.27, in full upon the Effective Date
of the Plan. The remaining balance of the Internal Revenue Service
claim, in the amount of $390, is a general unsecured claim and will
be paid a 15% distribution, or $58.50, upon the Effective Date of
the Plan.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that Class VI
General Unsecured Claims of Ewa and Dariusz Wejda will be paid over
five years at 1% to 60% of the claim. The Debtor did not schedule
these creditors as holding any claim. The creditors filed a claim
in the amount of $3,401,734.26. The Debtor has objected to this
claim.

A copy of the Second Amended Disclosure Statement is available at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-01356-185.pdf

               About Hartford Court Development

Hartford Court Development, Inc., is an Illinois corporation that
owns and manages 14 residential condominiums and their related
parking spaces, all located in the 5300 block of North Cumberland
Avenue, Chicago, IL.

Hartford Court Development filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D.
Ill. Case No. 17-01356) on Jan. 17, 2017.  Paula Walega, the
company's president, signed the petition.  The Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities at $500,000 to $1 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer.

The Debtor is represented by David P. Lloyd, Esq. at David P.
Lloyd, Ltd.


HATHAWAY HOMES: Hires Jay Kohler as Attorney
--------------------------------------------
Hathaway Homes Group, LLC, seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Idaho to hire Jay A. Kohler as its
attorney.

Professional services Jay A. Kohler is to render are:

     a. give Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession legal advice with
respect to its powers and duties under Chapter 11;

     b. prepare all bankruptcy forms and related court documents to
file and process this Chapter 11 case;

     c. take necessary action to avoid liens as required, and
assist the Debtor and Debtor-In-Possession in performing its other
statutory duties;

     d. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary applications,
answers, orders, reports and any other legal papers required by the
Court;

     e. file Motion for Use of Cash Collateral and Obtain Authority
to incur Secured Debt, when necessary;

     f. assist the Debtor and Debtor-in-Possession in the
preparation of the Disclosure Statement and Chapter 11 Plan; and

     g. perform all other legal services on behalf of the Debtor
and Debtor-In-Possession.

Jay A. Kohler will be paid $200.00 per hour plus cost for his
services.

Jay A. Kohler attests that he does not represent any interest
adverse to the Debtor in the matters upon which he is to be
engaged.

Mr. Kohler can be reached through:

     Jay A. Kohler, Esq.
     482 Constitution Way, Suite 313
     Idaho Falls, ID 83402-3537
     Tel: (208) 524-3272
     Fax: (208) 524-3619

             About Hathaway Homes Group

Hathaway Homes Group, LLC, is a dealer of recreational vehicle and
manufactured homes in South East Idaho.  It offers a selection of
new modular homes, mobile homes, toy haulers, and pre-owned RVs and
trailer homes.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Idaho Case No. 17-40992) on November 10, 2017.
Paul J. Hathaway, authorized representative, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Jim D. Pappas presides over the case.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Files Q3 Interim Financial Statements
----------------------------------------------------------
As previously reported in its Current Report on Form 8-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on Aug. 15, 2017, Helios and
Matheson Analytics Inc. disclosed its agreement to acquire a
majority stake in MoviePass Inc. pursuant to a Securities Purchase
Agreement entered into on the same date.  As previously reported in
its Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on Oct.
11, 2017, the Company and MoviePass entered into an Amendment No. 1
to the MoviePass SPA on Oct. 6, 2017.  The MoviePass Transaction
has not yet been completed and the issuance of shares of common
stock of the Company to MoviePass pursuant to the MoviePass SPA
remains subject to approval by the Company's stockholders in
accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635.

On Nov. 30, 2017, the Company filed a Current Report with the SEC
to provide audited and interim financial statements of MoviePass
and pro forma financial statements of the Company giving effect to
the MoviePass Transaction.

As of Sept. 30, 2017, MoviePass had $3.75 million in total assets,
$25.26 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $21.50 million.  MoviePass reported a net loss of $11.69
million on $4.96 million of total revenues for the nine months
ended Sept. 30, 2017, compared to a net loss of $4.02 million on
$6.81 million of total revenues for the nine months ended Sept. 30,
2016.

In accordance with Helios' and MoviePass' unaudited pro forma
condensed combined statements of operations, the Companies reported
a combined net loss of $105.72 million on $8.64 million of total
revenues for the nine months ended Sept. 30, 2017.  The Companies'
combined pro forma balance sheet as of Sept. 30, 2017, showed
$113.34 million in total assets, $87.88 million in total
liabilities and $23.35 million in total shareholders' equity.

Copies of the Financial Statements are available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/3tTvK6
                      https://is.gd/hnPsyM
                      https://is.gd/FxjX6w

                    About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. (NASDAQ: HMNY) --
http://www.hmny.com/-- is a provider of information technology
services and solutions, offering a range of technology platforms
focusing on big data, artificial intelligence, business
intelligence, social listening, and consumer-centric technology.
Its holdings include RedZone Map, a safety and navigation app for
iOS and Android users, and a community-based ecosystem that
features a socially empowered safety map app that enhances mobile
GPS navigation using advanced proprietary technology.  Through
TrendIt, HMNY has acquired technology addressing crowd and
migration patterns and consumer behavior in real-time.  The
patented technology predicts population behavior, along with a
crowd's population size, origin and destination.  HMNY is
headquartered in New York, NY and listed on the Nasdaq Capital
Market under the symbol HMNY.

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $7.38 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $2.11 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of Sept. 30,2017, Helios and
Matheson had $17.46 million in total assets, $41.54 million in
total liabilities, $2.09 million in redeemable common stock and a
$26.17 million total shareholders' deficit.


HELIOS AND MATHESON: Invests Additional $1.8M in MoviePass
----------------------------------------------------------
As previously disclosed, on Oct. 11, 2017, Helios and Matheson
Analytics Inc. and MoviePass Inc. entered into an Investment Option
Agreement, pursuant to which MoviePass granted HMNY an option to
purchase additional shares of MoviePass common stock in an amount
up to $20 million based on a pre-money valuation of MoviePass of
$210 million amounting to an additional investment of up to 8.7% of
the Currently Outstanding Shares of Common Stock (as defined in the
MoviePass Option Agreement) of MoviePass, giving effect to the
closing of the acquisition by HMNY of a majority stake in
MoviePass.  The issuance of HMNY's shares of common stock to
MoviePass in connection with the MoviePass Transaction remains
subject to approval by HMNY's stockholders in accordance with
Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635.

On Nov. 27, 2017, HMNY used $1.8 million of the cash proceeds
received from the mandatory prepayments under those certain
investor secured promissory notes issued by certain institutional
investors to HMNY on Nov. 7, 2017 in order to exercise an
additional $1.8 million of the MoviePass Option.  In connection
with the MoviePass Option Exercise, MoviePass issued HMNY a
subordinated convertible promissory note in the principal amount of
$1.8 million.  Assuming the closing of the MoviePass Transaction
occurs, MoviePass will issue the amount of shares of its common
stock to HMNY underlying the MoviePass Option Note, and upon such
issuance the MoviePass Option Note will be deemed satisfied in
full.

                    Legal Proceedings Update -
               HMNY/Zone Motion to Dismiss Granted

As previously reported, on Aug. 24, 2016, 3839 Holdings LLC filed a
summons and complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New
York, New York County, against Theodore Farnsworth, Highland
Holdings Group, Inc. and Zone Technologies, Inc.  The claims arose
out of 3839 Holdings' purchase of a 10% interest in HHGI and an
unsuccessful real estate investment by HHGI.  On or about Dec. 7,
2016, 3839 Holdings amended the complaint to add HMNY as a
defendant.  On Nov. 24, 2017, the Supreme Court of the State of New
York granted the motion to dismiss of Zone and HMNY, and all claims
asserted by 3839 Holdings against Zone and HMNY have been
dismissed.

                   About Helios and Matheson

Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. (NASDAQ: HMNY) --
http://www.hmny.com/-- is a provider of information technology
services and solutions, offering a range of technology platforms
focusing on big data, artificial intelligence, business
intelligence, social listening, and consumer-centric technology.
Its holdings include RedZone Map, a safety and navigation app for
iOS and Android users, and a community-based ecosystem that
features a socially empowered safety map app that enhances mobile
GPS navigation using advanced proprietary technology.  Through
TrendIt, HMNY has acquired technology addressing crowd and
migration patterns and consumer behavior in real-time.  The
patented technology predicts population behavior, along with a
crowd's population size, origin and destination.  HMNY is
headquartered in New York, NY and listed on the Nasdaq Capital
Market under the symbol HMNY.

Helios and Matheson reported a net loss of $7.38 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $2.11 million
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of Sept. 30,2017, Helios and
Matheson had $17.46 million in total assets, $41.54 million in
total liabilities, $2.09 million in redeemable common stock and a
$26.17 million total shareholders' deficit.


HHGREGG INC: Exclusive Plan Filing Period Extended Through Feb. 5
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Jeffrey J. Graham of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Indiana has entered an Order extending the
exclusive periods during which only hhgregg, Inc. and its
affiliated debtors may file and solicit acceptances of a chapter 11
plan through and including February 5 and April 5, 2018,
respectively.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtors needed additional time to formulate and propose a plan in
these cases. While the Debtors have sold substantially all of their
assets, the Debtors said that they are still working diligently to
address issues between creditor constituencies and complete their
wind down.

The Debtors told the Court that their efforts over the last few
months have continued to be focused on the successful wind-down of
their estates in order to maximize the value of the Debtors' assets
for the benefit of their creditors. The Debtors undertook multiple
strategies to liquidate their assets including a store closing sale
process, the sale of their intellectual property assets, and are in
the process of selling their rights in certain class actions.

The Debtors related that, to this point, their efforts have
resulted in the successful liquidation of substantially all of
their assets, including most recently their intellectual property
and their interest in certain class action assets. The Debtors
said, however, that they are continuing to evaluate what assets
remain in order to maximize the value for their creditors.

The Debtors have recently been working collaboratively with the
Pre-Petition Secured Lenders, the DIP Lenders, and the Committee to
negotiate an amended DIP Agreement that maximizes the value of the
Debtors' estate and the return to creditors. As such, the Debtors
asserted that extending the Exclusive Periods will allow these
negotiations to continue as all constituencies work toward a
liquidation of the Debtors' remaining assets.

                       About hhgregg Inc.

Indianapolis, Indiana-based hhgregg, Inc., is an appliance,
electronics and furniture retailer.  Founded in 1955, hhgregg is a
multi-regional retailer currently with 220 stores in 19 states that
also offers market-leading global and local brands at value prices
nationwide via http://www.hhgregg.com/

hhgregg Inc., Gregg Appliances Inc. and HHG Distributing LLC sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Ind. Lead Case No. 17-01302) on March 6, 2017.  The petitions were
signed by Kevin J. Kovacs, chief financial officer.

At the time of the filing, hhgregg and HHG Distributing estimated
assets and liabilities of less than $50,000.  Gregg Appliances
estimated assets and liabilities at $100 million to $500 million.

The Debtors engaged Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Ice Miller LLP
as counsel; Berkeley Research Group, LLC as financial advisor;
Stifel and Miller Buckfire & Co. as investment banker; Hilco IP
Services as intellectual property advisor; Altus Group US, Inc., as
tax advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as claims and
noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed creditors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors in the case of Gregg Appliances,
Inc., Case No. 17-01303-RLM-11.  No official committee has been
appointed in the cases of hhgregg, Inc., No. 17-01302-RLM-11 or HHG
Distributing, LLC, No. 17-01304-RLM-11.

The Committee hired Cooley LLP and Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP as
counsel, and ASK LLP as avoidance claims counsel.  The Committee
retained Province Inc. as financial advisor.

Counsel to the Agent for the Debtors' prepetition secured lenders
and the lenders providing DIP financing are Sean M. Monahan, Esq.,
at Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP; and Jay Jaffe, Esq., at Faegre Baker
Daniels, LLP.

Counsel to the FILO Agent is Stuart Brown, Esq., at DLA Piper LLP.

                          *     *     *

When hhgregg filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, it had signed a term
sheet with an anonymous party to purchase the Company assets.  The
Company said at that time it expected a quick and smooth process
through Chapter 11 with emergence in approximately 60 days.  Ten
days later, hhgregg said it has terminated the nonbinding term
sheet with the anonymous party because the Company was unable to
reach a definitive agreement on terms, and said it continues to
work with interested third parties to purchase assets of the
business.  hhgregg added it had received strong interest from third
parties interested in buying some or all of the Company's assets.

Subsequently, hhgregg executed a consulting agreement with a
contractual joint venture comprised of Tiger Capital Group, LLC,
and Great American Group, LLC, to conduct a sale of the merchandise
and furniture, fixtures and equipment located at the Company's
retail stores and distribution centers.

In an April order, the Bankruptcy Court approved, at the Company's
request, a plan for the Company to close 132 retail stores and the
Company's distribution centers.

According to a disclosure with the Securities and Exchange
Commission in March, debtors Gregg Appliances, Inc., and HHG
Distributing, LLC, entered into a Consulting Agreement with a
contractual joint venture between Tiger Capital Group and Great
American Group to conduct the sale of the merchandise and
furniture, fixtures and equipment located at the Company's 132
retail stores and the distribution centers.

As of June 8, 2017, the Debtors have completed store closing sales
in all its stories.

The Company has said it does not anticipate any value will remain
from the bankruptcy estate for the holders of the Company's common
stock, although this will be determined in the continuing
bankruptcy proceedings.


HRG GROUP: Fitch Upgrades Sr. Secured Notes to BB
-------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed HRG Group, Inc.'s (HRG) Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) at 'B'. The Rating Outlook is Stable. Fitch
has also upgraded HRG's senior secured notes rating to 'BB'/'RR1'
from 'BB-'/'RR2' and its senior unsecured notes rating to
'BB-'/'RR2' from 'B'/ 'RR4'. The ratings have been removed from
Rating Watch Evolving.

KEY RATING DRIVERS - IDRs and Senior Debt

The affirmation of the Long-Term IDR follows the closing of the
sale of Fidelity & Guaranty Life (FGL; Long-Term IDR 'BB+'/Stable),
a company that was previously 80.4% owned by HRG, to a consortium
led by CF Corp. for total consideration of approximately $1.8
billion, plus the assumption of $405 million of existing debt. The
consortium includes the founders of CF Corp., funds affiliated with
The Blackstone Group, L.P. (Long-Term IDR 'A+'/Stable) and Fidelity
National Financial, Inc. (Long-Term IDR 'BBB+'/Stable). CF Corp.
also acquired Front Street Re (Delaware) Ltd. (Front Street), which
was previously wholly-owned by HRG, for $65 million.

The 'B' Long-Term IDR is supported by the credit risk profile and
underlying diversity of HRG's largest investment, Spectrum Brands,
Inc. (Spectrum Brands; Long-term IDR of 'BB'/Stable), and HRG's
adequate liquidity position. While the FGL and Front Street sales
will meaningfully reduce HRG's leverage and improve its upstream
dividend coverage of holding company interest expense, the rating
is constrained by the concentrated nature of HRG's remaining
investments. HRG is effectively operating as a single-investment,
pass-through structure for Spectrum Brands, which is 59.6% owned by
HRG. Its other remaining investments are in NZCH Corporation, a
public shell company and Salus Capital Partners, LLC, a secured
asset-backed lender that is in run-off.

Fitch calculates that upstream dividends from HRG's subsidiaries
relative to holding company interest expenses measured 0.5x in
fiscal 2017, 0.4x in fiscal year 2016 and 0.5x in 2015. However,
proceeds received from the FGL and Front Street transactions, which
amount to approximately $1.5 billion, significantly enhance HRG's
liquidity position and will enable HRG to repay all of its $864.4
million 7.875% senior secured notes due 2019 and a portion of its
$890 million 7.75% senior unsecured notes due 2022 and other
obligations. Since HRG expects to receive approximately $60.7
million of dividends from its subsidiaries' distributable earnings
in fiscal year 2018, dividend coverage of holding company interest
expense should improve comfortably above 1.0x.

Debt-to-equity based on the carrying value of HRG's investments
remained elevated at 2.4x as of Sept. 30, 2017. Since HRG's largest
current holding is in a publicly traded company (Spectrum Brands),
Fitch also considers pro forma debt-to-equity based on the market
value of HRG's public investment, but recognizing that market
values can fluctuate. Nevertheless, on this basis, Fitch calculates
that HRG's leverage was 0.6x as of Sept. 30, 2017, compared to 0.4x
at FYE 2016 and 0.6x at FYE 2015. Debt-to-equity based on the
carrying value of HRG's investments is 0.5x and debt-to-equity on
the basis of the market value of HRG's public investments is 0.1x
pro forma for the FGL and Front Street sales, which are both strong
for the rating.

The upgrade of HRG's senior secured debt rating to 'BB'/'RR1' from
'BB-'/'RR2' reflects an expectation of outstanding recoveries for
these securities in the event of a corporate default. The improved
ratings reflect HRG's increased cash balance pro forma for the FGL
and Front Street sales. Given the outstanding recovery prospects
for the senior secured notes, the ratings are notched up three
notches from HRG's IDR.

The upgrade of HRG's senior unsecured debt rating to 'BB-'/'RR2'
from 'B'/'RR4' reflects an expectation of superior recoveries for
these securities in the event of a corporate default. Given the
superior recovery prospects for the senior unsecured notes, the
ratings are notched up twice from HRG's IDR.

According to HRG's secured and unsecured notes indentures, if a
change of control occurs, the noteholders may require HRG to
repurchase all or a portion of its notes for cash at a price equal
to 101% of aggregate principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of repurchase.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDR and Senior Debt

The following factors may result in upward rating momentum in HRG's
IDR:
-- A sale to a higher-rated entity;
-- Greater clarity with respect to HRG's long-term strategic
    direction, organizational structure, and ownership framework.

The following drivers could result in a downgrade of HRG's IDR:
-- A sale to a lower-rated entity;
-- Sustained uncertainty with respect to HRG's strategic
    direction, organizational structure, or ownership framework;
-- Deterioration in the operating performance of Spectrum Brands
    that results in a material decline in its value, dividend
    capacity and/or credit ratings.

The 'BB'/'RR1' senior secured debt rating would be sensitive to any
changes in the company's IDR, as well as to changes in the level of
available asset coverage.

The 'BB-'/'RR2' senior unsecured debt rating is sensitive to
potential changes in the company's IDR, as well as to changes in
the level of available asset coverage.

Fitch has taken the following rating actions:

HRG Group, Inc.
-- Long-Term IDR affirmed at 'B';
-- Senior secured notes upgraded to 'BB'/'RR1' from 'BB-'/'RR2';
-- Senior unsecured notes upgraded to 'BB-'/'RR2' from 'B'/'RR4'.

The Ratings have been removed from Rating Watch Evolving. The
Rating Outlook is Stable.

Based in New York, N.Y., HRG Group, Inc., through its subsidiaries,
provides various branded consumer products.  Its product portfolio
includes consumer batteries, such as alkaline and zinc carbon
batteries, nickel metal hydride rechargeable batteries, battery
chargers, battery-powered portable lighting products, hearing aid
batteries, and other specialty battery products; small appliances
comprising small kitchen appliances and home product appliances;
and personal care products, such as electric shaving and grooming
products, hair care appliances, and accessories.


IGNITE RESTAURANT: U.S. Trustee, Other Parties Object to Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that multiple parties -- including the
U.S. Trustee (UST) assigned to the Ignite Restaurant Group case,
Navillus Group, Navigators Specialty Insurance Company and current
and former employees represented by operation of the Fair Labor
Standards Act ("Class Proof of General Unsecured and Priority
Claimants") -- filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court separate
objections to the Company's Plan of Reorganization.  The UST
asserts, "The Debtors' Plan should not be confirmed because it does
not currently satisfy the requirements of section 1129 of the
Bankruptcy Code. First, the Debtors' must carry their burden of
proof to demonstrate and establish that the elements of 11 U.S.C.
section 1129 have been met for Plan confirmation. Second, Plan does
not provide sufficient information regarding the proposed
substantive consolidation and Debtors must demonstrate that the
required legal standards have been met to establish the substantive
consolidation of the Debtors. Third, the Plan improperly provides
broad third party releases, exculpations and injunctions, in
violation of section 524(e) of the Bankruptcy Code and applicable
Fifth Circuit law. Lastly, Debtors are liquidating and the overly
broad release, exculpation and release provisions contained in the
Plan provide a de facto discharge which is contrary to Section
1141(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Plan does not meet the
requirements of 11 U.S.C. section 1129. In the absence of
amendments to deal with such matters as are noted below, the UST
recommends that the Court deny confirmation of the Joint Chapter 11
Plan of Reorganization. The UST objects that the Plan is deficient
because it proposes a substantive consolidation of the respective
Debtors' estates without any discussion as to the legal standards
required, how the standard is met in these cases, or the impact on
respective creditor recoveries."

                  About Ignite Restaurant

Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., et al., operate two well-known
restaurant brands, Joe's Crab Shack and Brick House Tavern + Tap
that offer a variety of high-quality food and beverages in a
distinctive, casual, high-energy atmosphere.  They operate 130+
restaurants and have three international franchise locations, and
employ about 8,400 employees.

Ignite Restaurant Group and its affiliates filed for bankruptcy in
Texas (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-33550) on June 6, 2017.
The petitions were signed by Jonathan Tibus, chief executive
officer.  The Hon. David R. Jones presides over the Debtors'
cases.
  
Ignite Restaurant Group and its affiliated debtors sought
bankruptcy protection to facilitate a sale of its business to a
private equity firm for $50 million in cash plus the assumption of
certain liabilities.

As of April 30, 2017, the Debtors reported $153.4 million in total
assets and $197.4 million in total liabilities.

The Debtors have employed King & Spalding LLP as legal counsel;
Jonathan Tibus, managing director at Alvarez & Marsal North
America, as their chief executive officer; Piper Jaffray & Co. as
investment banker; Hilco Real Estate, LLC as real estate advisor;
and Garden City Group as their claims and noticing agent.

On June 21, 2017, a five-member panel was appointed as the official
unsecured creditors committee in the Debtors' cases.  The committee
tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as counsel, Cole Schotz
P.C. as local counsel, and FTI Consulting, Inc., as financial
advisor.


IHEARTCOMMUNICATIONS INC: Continues Talks on Debt Restructuring
---------------------------------------------------------------
iHeartCommunications, Inc. commenced on March 15, 2017, exchange
offers to exchange certain series of its outstanding series of debt
securities for new securities of the Company, iHeartMedia, Inc. and
CC Outdoor Holdings, Inc. and concurrent consent solicitations with
respect to the Existing Notes.  In addition, on March 15, 2017, the
Company also commenced offers to amend its outstanding Term Loan D
and Term Loan E borrowings under its senior secured credit
facility.

The Company has engaged in discussions with certain lenders under
its Term Loan D and Term Loan E facilities and certain priority
guarantee noteholders and counsel to certain of those Lenders in
connection with the Term Loan Offers.  In connection with these
discussions, the Company and certain Lenders entered into
non-disclosure agreements.  On Nov. 21, 2017, the Company provided
certain Lenders with a proposal, a copy of which is available for
free at https://is.gd/AJlUY2.  On Nov. 28, 2017, the Lenders
provided the Company with a counterproposal, a copy of which is
available for free at https://is.gd/TFRxiA.  As of Nov. 30, 2017,
the Company had not provided those Lenders with, nor had it
provided those Lenders access to, confidential information.

No agreement has been reached with respect to the discussions and
discussions remain ongoing.  There can be no assurance that any
agreement will be reached.  Any such agreement will require the
consent of additional debt holders who are not party to the
negotiations, and who hold substantial percentages of the Company's
debt.

                     About iHeartMedia, Inc. and
                     iHeartCommunications, Inc.

Based in San Antonio, Texas, iHeartMedia, Inc. (PINK: IHRT), the
parent company of iHeartCommunications, Inc., is a global media and
entertainment company.  The Company specializes in radio, digital,
outdoor, mobile, social, live events, on-demand entertainment and
information services for local communities, and uses its
unparalleled national reach to target both nationally and locally
on behalf of its advertising partners.  The Company is dedicated to
using the latest technology solutions to transform the Company's
products and services for the benefit of its consumers,
communities, partners and advertisers, and its outdoor business
reaches over 34 countries across five continents, connecting people
to brands using innovative new technology.

iHeartCommunications reported a net loss attributable to the
Company of $296.31 million in 2016, a net loss attributable to the
Company of $754.62 million in 2015, and a net loss attributable to
the Company of $793.76 million in 2014.  As of Sept. 30, 2017,
iHeartCommunications had $12.25 billion in total assets, $23.93
billion in total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of
$11.67 billion.

                           *    *    *

In March 2017, Fitch Ratings downgraded iHeartCommunications,
Inc.'s Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'C' from 'CC'.  The
downgrade reflects iHeart's announcement on March 15, 2017, that
the company has commenced a global restructuring effort targeting
approximately $14.6 billion in debt including all of the
outstanding Term Loans and PGNs as well as the senior notes due
2021.

Also in March 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Texas-based media company iHeartMedia Inc. and its
subsidiary iHeartCommunications Inc. to 'CC' from 'CCC'.  The
rating outlook is negative.  The downgrade follows
iHeartCommunications' announcement that it has offered to exchange
five series of priority-guarantee notes, its senior notes due 2021,
and its term loan D and E for longer-dated debt; and, in certain
scenarios, stock and warrants, or contingent value rights.  "Under
all but one scenario, there would be a reduction in the principal
amount of debt outstanding and an extension of the debt maturity by
two years for exchanged debt," said S&P Global Ratings' credit
analyst Jeanne Shoesmith.  "The company's debt is trading at
significant discounts to par of 20%-60%, and we believe its capital
structure is unsustainable."

In December 2016, Moody's Investors Service affirmed
iHeartCommunications, Inc.'s 'Caa2' Corporate Family Rating.


IMPERIAL PALMS: Needs More Time to Finalize Sale Pact, File Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Imperial Palms Resort, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of California to extend the exclusivity periods
for the Debtor to file a Chapter 11 plan to Feb. 26, 2018, from
Nov. 28, 2017, and to solicit acceptances of the plan to April 27,
2018, from Jan. 27, 2018.

A hearing to consider the Debtor's request is scheduled for Jan.
11, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.

The Debtor has made an effort to locate potential buyers for the
Imperial Palms Resort at Barbara Worth and has received a letter of
intent by a Chinese company offering to purchase the Resort from
the Debtor for a purchase price of $7.25 million.  The LOI was
accepted and there are ongoing efforts to finalize a purchase and
sale agreement with the LOI buyer.  In the meantime, however, the
Debtor has sought to increase the number of interested buyers and
has signed a Commercial and Residential Income Listing Agreement
with P C Realty, Inc., and Sperry Commercial1 in order to list the
Subject Property for sale at $8.5 million.

The Debtor has been informed by the broker, JC Fan, that there is a
third party preparing an offer on the 2050 Country Club 6 Drive,
Holtville, California 92250, in the range of $8.5 million.  The
Debtor anticipates that this offer will be received prior to the
hearing on this matter. If this offer is received and finalized as
anticipated, the Debtor will have more than enough money to pay
Clearinghouse Community Development Financial Institution in full.
In fact, if Oasis Growth Partners, Inc., agrees to subordinate its
secured claim to all allowed general unsecured claims 'with the
exception to claims held by other current and/or former owners of
the Debtor, then there will be enough money to pay all non-insider
creditors in full.

The Debtor says it is interested in working with creditors,
including Clearinghouse, towards a consensual plan of
reorganization or a liquidation of the Debtor's assets that will
pay all non-insider creditors in full.  In order to avoid having
undue pressure from creditors, and maintaining the status quo for
the time being, the Debtor brings this motion to extend the
exclusivity period for the filing of a plan of reorganization.  The
extension will allow the Debtor to finalize a purchase and sale
agreement that will hopefully pay all non-insider creditors in
full.  

The extension being sought from the original exclusivity period
would be 90 days, well within the outside period provided by
Section 1121, which is 18 months after the date of filing.  In this
case, the filing occurred on July 31, 2017, 20 months from that
point would be Jan. 31, 2019.

The Debtor's case is fairly complex.  The Debtor has no less than
five significant secured creditor in Clearinghouse, Kevin Smith,
Darryl Readshaw, Qing Tao and OGP.  A number of these claimants are
current or former insiders.  The Debtor also has significant claims
with priorities (including various claims from former employees and
allegedly unpaid taxes).· As a corporate Debtor, the Debtor must
find a way to satisfy the Absolute Priority Rule or, in the
alternative, develop a plan that will likely receive approval from
all creditor classes.  Currently, the Debtor is working on
finalizing a purchase and sale agreement that may resolve many
issues.  

The Debtor says that it is anticipated that certain claims will
still have to be litigated and/or negotiated, including several of
the insider claims that arose due to the purchase of Debtor's
securities and the claims of the Internal Revenue Service which are
based on tax returns prepared by the previous ownership group,
which are being amended at this time.  Perhaps more importantly,
the Debtor is in a situation where it has equity as an ongoing
company but has to continue operations and must find the necessary
funds to continue its operations.  The Debtor is able to maintain
operations as a result of its Chapter 11 bankruptcy, but needs a
fully developed strategy to satisfy those creditors that have
outstanding arrearages on their claims against the Debtor.  In
order to satisfy these claims, the Debtor must have a new source of
cash, whether it be by Debtor-In-Possession Financing or through
the sale of its assets, the avenue being considered at this time.
In order to ensure that this occurs, the Debtor is working
diligently towards a global plan that will allow it to remain in
business and pay its non-insider creditors in full.

The Debtor needs to continue its effort to secure a purchaser for
the Resort and is working diligently to find a buyer.
Alternatively, the Debtor continues to work to obtain financing
that would help the Debtor provide payments to secured creditors
and establish a longer period to complete the sale of its assets.
The Debtor has hired a broker to assist it in identifying potential
buyers.  These efforts are ongoing, along with discussions with
current owners on the potential to have the current shareholders
remain as owners of the Debtor by and through further capital
contributions.  As these talks will likely involve the infusion of
significant cash into the Debtor, it is understandable that those
discussion proceed at their own pace.  However, the Debtor
continues to diligently pursue all potential avenues and hopes to
have a motion to sell the Resort in a short period of time.

The Debtor says it has weathered the slow season and has obtained
capital infusions from OGP to continue in operations.  The Debtor
has also employed a broker for the Debtor to seek and obtain a
buyer for the Resort and to pay all non-insider creditors in full.
The Debtor anticipates having a hearing take place on a potential
sale before the end of January 2018 and does not anticipate needing
-- the entire 90-day continuance being requested, but is requesting
a longer extension only to ensure that Debtor has enough time to
complete negotiations.

The Debtor had previously not been paying its ongoing obligations
in full.  However, with the Debtor entering its peak season the
Debtor is paying all ongoing operation costs and should be current
with all creditors on all post-petition operation costs.  The
Debtor assures the Court that there is no harm being done to
creditors by the ongoing operation of the Debtor.  Indeed, as the
Debtor remains in operations, the more interest the Debtor is
garnering for the sale of the business.

Ongoing negotiations with potential buyers still need to be
finalized.  As negotiations continue, the Debtor is hoping to have
a motion on file to sell the Debtor's property free and clear of
liens.  The sale would allow the Debtor to pay all non-insider
allowed claims in full.

The Debtor says it has not had an opportunity to negotiate with
creditors due to the general lack of funds.  However, as the Debtor
enters its peak season and as the Debtor negotiates with potential
buyers, the Debtor anticipates that discussions on the ultimate
allowance of certain claims will commence once a bona fide offer is
received.  The Debtor anticipates receiving an offer shortly,
certainly prior to the hearing on this matter.

A copy of the Debtor's request is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/casb17-04553-71.pdf

                     About Imperial Palms Resort

Imperial Palms Resort, LLC, owns the Imperial Palms Hotel & Resort
located at 2050 Country Club Drive, Holtville, CA 92550, valued at
$10 million.  The Debtor filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-04553) on July 31, 2017.  The petition was signed
by Rebecca Chiu, CEO and manager.

The Hon. Margaret M. Mann presides over the case.  The Debtor is
represented by John L. Smaha, Esq., at Smaha Law Group, APC.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $11.27 million in
assets and $8.74 million in liabilities.


INDEPENDENCE TAX II: Completes Liquidation and Winding-Up
---------------------------------------------------------
Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. II completed its liquidation and
winding-up on Nov. 30, 2017, and has filed a certificate of
cancellation with the Secretary of State of Delaware and a Form 15
with the Securities Exchange Commission to terminate registration
under Section 12(g) of the Securities of Exchange Act of 1934,
after which the Partnership will no longer be required to file
reports under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  The
Partnership transferred its entire cash balance, after setting
aside a reserve for the payment of accrued operating expenses and
accrued liquidation expenses, to a paying agent for distributions
to investors.

On May 15, 2017, the Partnership sold its last remaining
investment.  Liquidation of the Partnership in accordance with
Section 8.1(ii) of the Limited Partnership Agreement requires the
Partnership to dissolve 150 days following the sale of the
Partnership's last remaining investment.

               About Independence Tax Credit Plus

Based in New York, Independence Tax Credit Plus L.P. II was
organized on Feb. 11, 1992, and commenced its public offering on
Jan. 19, 1993.  The general partner of the Partnership is Related
Independence Associates L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.  The
general partner of Related Independence Associates L.P. is Related
Independence Associates Inc., a Delaware Corporation.  The ultimate
parent of Related Independence Associates L.P. is Centerline
Holding Company.

The Partnership's business is primarily to invest in other
partnerships owning leveraged apartment complexes that are eligible
for the low-income housing tax credit enacted in the Tax Reform Act
of 1986, some of which may also be eligible for the historic
rehabilitation tax credit.

As of Sept. 30, 2017, Independence Tax had $1.43 million in total
assets, $1.93 million in total liabilities and a total partners'
deficit of $502,811.

Independence Tax reported a net loss of $679,066 on $0 of revenues
for the year ended March 31, 2017, compared to a net loss of
$590,835 on $0 of revenues for the year ended March 31, 2016.


INGERSOLL FINANCIAL: Hires Frank Martin Wolff as Attorney
---------------------------------------------------------
Ingersoll Financial, LLC, seeks approval from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando) to
hire Frank M. Wolff and Frank Martin Wolff, P.A., as attorneys.

The professional services that the Attorneys are to render are:

     a. advise and counsel the debtor-in-possession concerning the
operation of its business in compliance with Chapter 11 and orders
of this court;

     b. defend any causes of action on behalf of the
debtor-in-possession;

     c. prepare, on behalf of the debtor-in-possession, all
necessary applications, motions, reports, and other legal papers in
the Chapter 11 case;

     d. assist in the formulation of a plan of reorganization and
preparation of a disclosure statement; and

     e. provide all services of a legal nature in the field of
bankruptcy law.

FMWPA will be compensated for its services by:

     a. reasonable compensation for actual necessary services
rendered by FMWPA, based on the nature, the extent and the value of
such services, the time spent on such services, and the cost of
comparable services other than in the case under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 101
et seq.;

     b. reimbursement for actual, necessary expenses;

     c. $1,617.50 was paid for legal services provided in this case
prior to the petition date;

     d. $8,382.50 was paid as a retainer for post-petition fees and
costs.

Frank M. Wolff attests that he and his firm have no connection with
the Debtor, creditors, and any other party in interest, their
respective attorneys and accountants, the United States Trustee, or
any person
employed in the office of the United States Trustee; do not hold or
represent any interest adverse to the estate; and are disinterested
persons within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. 101(14).

The Firm can be reached through:

     Frank M. Wolff, Esq.
     FRANK MARTIN WOLFF, P.A.
     19 E. Central Blvd.
     Orlando, FL 32801
     Tel: (407) 982-4448
     Fax: (407) 386-3364
     Email: fwolff@fwolfflaw.com

            About Ingersoll Financial, LLC

Headquartered in Orlando, Florida, The Ingersoll Group --
http://www.theingersollgroup.com-- is  a national private
investment organization founded by Keith Ingersoll 12 years ago.
The Group's investments are concentrated in a few primary sectors,
including: real estate, sports management, business networking,
digital enterprise, finance, hospitality and land development.

The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case no. 17-07077) on
November 7, 2017. The petition was signed by Keith R. Ingersoll,
president and CEO.

The Debtor is represented by Frank M. Wolff, Esq. at Frank Martin
Wolff, P.A. as counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $1 million to $10
million in both assets and liabilities.


INLAND ENVIRONMENTAL: Hearing on Plan Confirmation Set for March 1
------------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Jeff Bohm of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas has scheduled for March 1, 2018, at 10:00 a.m.
the hearing to consider the approval of Inland Environmental and
Remediation, Inc.'s disclosure statement and confirmation of its
Chapter 11 plan of liquidation.

The Debtor will file its amended plan and amended disclosure
statement by Feb. 1, 2018.

Objections to the Disclosure Statement and plan confirmation must
be filed by Feb. 26, 2018.

If a plan is not confirmed by March 1, 2018, then absent
extraordinary circumstances, this case will be dismissed.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on April 18, 2017, the
Debtor filed with the Court a disclosure statement dated April 5,
2017, in support of the Chapter 11 plan of liquidation.  Under the
Plan, Class 3 General Unsecured Claims will be paid a quarterly pro
rata distribution by the plan agent from 30% of the proceeds from
the sale or liquidation of the road base material manufactured by
the Debtor until the conclusion of the Play by court order,
payments commencing on 120 days after the Effective Date.

                  About Inland Environmental

Inland Environmental and Remediation, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case No.
16-34624) on Sept. 14, 2016.  The petition was signed by David L.
Polston, chief executive officer and president.  The case is
assigned to Judge Jeff Bohm.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

Richard L. Fuqua, II, Esq., at Fuqua & Associates P.C. serves as
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


IREP MONTGOMERY-MRF: Court Extends Exclusive Plan Filing Date
-------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Dwight H. Williams, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of Alabama has extended, at the behest of IREP
Montgomery-MRF, LLC, the exclusive period to file a Chapter 11-exit
plan, as well as the period in which the Debtor has to gain
acceptance of the plan by 90 days.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Nov. 2, 2017, the
Debtor asked for the extension, saying that it is appropriate for
the Court to extend the exclusivity period beyond the anticipated
next setting for the 363 Motion.  The Debtor related that, prior to
filing the case, it has negotiated an asset purchase agreement with
the City of Montgomery and the Municipal Solid Waste Disposal
Authority, as the Debtor intends to sell its assets under 11 U.S.C.
Section 363 utilizing the City and the Authority as a "stalking
horse bidder" under the APA.  The Debtor asserted some 20 different
companies had expressed an interest in operating or purchasing the
Facility -- a mixed materials recovery facility -- and that the
parties envisioned that the 363 motion would be filed quickly after
the commencement of the case and the Debtor would be able to assess
fairly whether a plan might be beneficial.

                    About IREP Montgomery-MRF

Based in Montgomery, Alabama, IREP Montgomery-MRF, LLC, sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. M.D.
Ala. Case No. 16-32279) on Aug. 20, 2016.  The petition was signed
by Kyle Mowitz, manager.  

Clyde Ellis Brazeal, III, Esq., and Paul O. Woodall, Jr., Esq., at
Jones Walker LLP serve as the Debtor's legal counsel.

The case is assigned to Judge Dwight H. Williams Jr.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated its assets at $10
million to $50 million and debts at $50 million to $100 million.


IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: Seeks Name Change Amid Assets Sale to BBI
---------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Ironclad Performance Wear filed
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court an emergency motion for an order
authorizing Debtors to effectuate a name change. The motion
explains, "Under the Asset Purchase Agreement between the Debtors
and Brighton-Best International ('BBI'), the Debtors 'may not,
directly or indirectly, use the name 'Ironclad', 'Ironclad
Performance Wear' or any derivative thereof or any similar name, or
trade name currently used to identify themselves. Each of [the
Debtors] shall be responsible for all filing fees required to be
paid in connection with filing [the Debtors'] change of name
amendments in the States of Nevada and California, and in each
other state in which it is qualified to transact business."

As the Court-approved sale of the Debtors' assets to Brighton-Best
International will will close, the Debtors are required to change
their names as a result of the sale to BBI, according to the
report.

                About Ironclad Performance Wear

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation designs and manufactures
branded performance work wear for a variety of construction,
do-it-yourself, industrial, sporting goods and general services
markets.  Since inception, the company has leveraged its
proprietary technologies to design task-specific technical gloves
and performance apparel designed to improve the wearer's ability to
perform specific job functions.

Ironclad's gloves are available through industrial suppliers,
hardware stores, home centers, lumber yards, and sporting goods
retailers nationwide; and through authorized distributors in North
America, Europe, Australia, Middle East, Asia and South America.

Ironclad Performance Wear Corp, a California corporation and
Ironclad Performance Wear Corp, a Nevada corporation sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case Nos. 17-12408 and 17-12409) on Sept. 8, 2017.  Geoffrey
L. Greulich, CEO, signed the petitions.  The cases are jointly
administered and are assigned to Judge Martin R. Barash.

Ironclad California estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  In its schedules,
Ironclad Nevada disclosed $16.6 million in assets and $8.05 million
in debt.

Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Brill L.L.P serves as counsel to the
Debtor.  Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP acts as the Debtor's
special corporate and securities, special trademark, and special
litigation, counsel.  Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC and Michael D.
Schwarzmann are the Debtor's financial advisors.

On Sept. 22, 2017, the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.  The Creditors
Committee retained Brown Rudnick LLP as its legal counsel; and
Province Inc. as financial advisor.

An official committee of equity security holders also has been
established in the case.  The equity panel retained Dentons US LLP
as counsel.


JAMES HARDIE: Moody's Rates Proposed $400MM Sr. Unsec. Notes Ba1
----------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned Ba1 ratings to James Hardie
International Finance Designated Activity Company proposed $400
million senior unsecured notes due 2025 and $400 million senior
unsecured notes due 2028. James Hardie's Ba1 Corporate Family
Rating and Ba1-PD Probability of Default Rating as well as its
Speculative-Grade Liquidity rating of SGL-2 are affirmed. The
rating outlook is stable.

The proceeds from the two series of unsecured note issuance
totaling $800 million will be used to refinance the company's $400
million senior unsecured notes due 2023, pay off advances under its
$500 million revolving credit facility ($270 million outstanding as
of September 20, 2017), and for general corporate purposes. James
Hardie may also use net proceeds from this offering to finance a
portion of the previously announced Fermacell acquisition.

Assignments:

Issuer: James Hardie Intl Fin Designated Activity Co.

-- Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned Ba1 (LGD4)

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: James Hardie Intl Fin Designated Activity Co.

-- Outlook, Remains Stable

Affirmations:

Issuer: James Hardie Intl Fin Designated Activity Co.

-- Probability of Default Rating, Affirmed Ba1-PD

-- Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-2

-- Corporate Family Rating, Affirmed Ba1

RATINGS RATIONALE

The Ba1 Corporate Family Rating benefits from James Hardie's
conservative balance sheet management that is aligned with creditor
interests and its deep-rooted industry expertise combined with
solid operating strategy and world-wide reputation as one of the
largest manufacturers of fiber cement. Further strengthening the
credit risk profile is the company's financial policy that sets a
maximum of 2x net leverage ratio. Even though James Hardie's debt
to EBITDA is anticipated to be above 2x over the next 12 months
because of the recent acquisition of Fermacell -- an European fiber
gypsum manufacturer -- Moody's believe that the company will be
below 2x debt to EBITDA sometime in 2019. Furthermore, the
company's interest coverage is maintained above 8x over the next
12-18 months. In addition, the Ba1 rating is supported by the
company's ability to produce solid cash flow from operations on an
ongoing basis (before asbestos related payments).

However, the company's exposure to the asbestos liability remains a
risk factor. Moody's considers the asbestos liability to be
mitigated by the terms of Amended & Restated Final Funding
Agreement ("AFFA") and treat it as a non-debt liability. However, a
certain percentage of the company's operating cash flows (35%) must
be put toward the asbestos fund thereby limiting the cash flow
available for the company's core business. At 9/30/2017, the net
unfunded liability was $593 million. In addition, the company is
building in additional capacity -- one plant already underway and
another one will be started in 2018. The CAPEX spend will place a
burden on cash flow. Over the next couple of years, free cash flow
will most likely be negative.

James Hardie's Speculative-Grade Liquidity ("SGL") rating of SGL-2
indicates that the company's liquidity profile is good over the
next 12 months. The SGL rating takes into consideration internal
liquidity, external liquidity, covenant compliance, and alternative
liquidity sources. As discussed above, cash flow from operations is
expected to be strong, but CAPEX will place pressure on the cash
flow. Cash balance is maintained at around $100 million. The
company's liquidity profile is primarily supported by its $500
million unsecured revolving credit facility (unrated by Moody's)
that matures in 2020. Pro forma for this transaction, the company
will have no advances outstanding. The company is anticipated to
use the revolving credit facility for seasonal needs on an ongoing
basis. The unsecured credit facility is governed by two maintenance
covenants: interest coverage and debt leverage. James Hardie has to
maintain an interest coverage ratio at 3.25x (at 9/30/17 the
company was at 14.9x per the credit agreement calculation),
leverage ratio has to be less than 3x (at 1.39x at 9/30/17).
Looking forward for the next 12 to 18 months, James Hardie is
expected to have ample room under its covenants. James Hardie also
has good alternative liquidity as all of its debt is unsecured.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's view that the company's
financial performance is expected to continue to improve and that
James Hardie will maintain a relatively conservative approach
toward shareholder distributions.

The ratings could be upgraded if James Hardie substantially reduces
its asbestos liability. The ratings upgrade will also consider the
company's business profile (narrow product offering, exposure to
cyclical end markets) and minimal free cash flow generation both of
which are limited when compared to many investment-grade issuers at
the lower end of the Baa ratings range.

The ratings could be downgraded if the company changes its
financial policy to be more shareholder friendly. Further, any
negative change in the asbestos liability could result in a
downgrade. Also, EBIT/interest expense of less than 5x on a
sustained basis would be considered a trigger for downgrade.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Global
Manufacturing Companies published in June 2017.

James Hardie International Finance Designated Activity Company is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of James Hardie Industries plc, domiciled
in Ireland, is a global manufacturer of fiber-cement products and
systems for internal and external building construction
applications primarily sold in the United States, Australia, New
Zealand and the Philippines. The company's revenues and net income
for the trailing twelve months ended September 30, 2017 were $1.98
billion and $256 million, respectively.



M & G USA: Taps Crain Caton & James as Special Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
M & G USA Corporation seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to hire Crain Caton & James, P.C. as
special counsel.

Services to be provided by Crain Caton are:

     (a) analyze, investigate and assess the validity of liens
asserted against the Corpus Christi Plant and related property of
the Debtors;

     (b) analyze, review and potentially arbitrate, litigate,
and/or resolve the claims, demands, lawsuits, and arbitrations
asserted against the Debtors concerning the Corpus Christi Plant;

     (c) advise, negotiate and advocate on behalf of the Debtors
with respect to their interests in agreements, real estate matters,
and relationships with the Port of Corpus Christi, City of Corpus
Christi, local pipeline and power companies, and others as to the
Corpus Christi Plant; and

     (d) advise the Debtors' primary bankruptcy counsel and other
professionals with respect to the foregoing matters as necessary to
pursue the Debtors' chapter 11 efforts, including with respect to a
sale of the Corpus Christi Plant.

Crain Caton's firm-wide hourly rate are:

     Shareholders          $425 - $595 per hour
     Associates            $265 - $395 per hour
     Paralegals and
        Legal Assistants   $160 - $235 per hour

Melinda M. Riseden, a shareholder at Crain Caton & James, P.C.,
attests that Crain Caton does not represent any Interested Party or
any other known creditor or party-in-interest of the Debtors with
respect to the matters for which the Debtors seek to retain Crain
Caton pursuant to the Application. Accordingly, Crain Caton is
disinterested with respect to the matters for which is it being
retained by the Debtors and is eligible for retention pursuant to
section 327(e) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, Melinda
M. Riseden disclosed that:

     -- the firm has not agreed to any variations from, or
alternatives to, its standard or customary billing arrangements for
this engagement;

     -- none of the professionals included in the engagement vary
their rate based on the geographic location of the bankruptcy
case;

     -- in the 12 months prepetition, the Crain Caton shareholder,
associate, and paralegal rates were billed at their hourly rates
charged for comparable representations. The range for shareholders
billing on the Debtors' matters prepetition was $425 to $520 per
hour, the range for associates was $265 to $295 per hour, and the
range for paralegals was $160 to $180 per hour. Postpetition,
taking effect on January 1, 2018 in accordance with Crain Caton's
regular periodic adjustments, the rates for shareholders billing on
the Debtors' matters will range from $500 to $560 per hour, for
associates from $350 to $380 per hour, and for paralegals from $200
to $220 per hour; and

     -- the Debtors and Crain Caton expect to develop a prospective
budget and staffing plan to comply with the U.S. Trustee's requests
for information and additional disclosures, recognizing that in the
course of these Cases, there may be unforeseeable fees and expenses
that will need to be addressed by the Debtors and Crain Caton.

The Special Counsel can be reached through:

     Melinda M. Riseden, Esq.
     Crain Caton & James, P.C
     Five Houston Center, 17th Floor
     1401 McKinney, Suite 1700
     Houston, TX 77010
     Phone:713-752-8698
     Email: mriseden@craincaton.com

                    About M & G USA Corporation

M & G USA Corporation and affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12307) on October 30, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Dennis Stogsdill, its chief restructuring
officer.

The Hon. Brendan L. Shannon presides over the cases.  Scott J.
Greenberg, Esq., Carl E. Black, Esq. and Stacey L. Corr-Irvine,
Esq. at Jones Day stand as the Debtors' counsel.  Pachulski Stang
Ziehl & Jones LLP serves as conflicts counsel and co-counsel.
Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC represents the Debtors as
restructuring advisor and Rothschild Inc. serves as investment
banker.

At the time of filing, the Debtors estimated $1 billion to $10
billion both in assets and liabilities.

Founded in 1953, M&G Group is a privately owned chemical company in
Italy and is controlled through the holding company M&G Finanziaria
S.p.A.  The M&G Group -- specifically, its chemicals division,
which includes the Debtors -- is a producer of polyethylene
terephthalate resin for packaging applications.

On November 13, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


MARKET SQUARE: Has Until January 10 to File Chapter 11 Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Judge Janet S. Baer of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Illinois has extended the time by which only Market
Square Hospitality, LLC has the right to file a plan of
reorganization to January 10, 2018.  The Court also continued this
matter to January 10.

The Troubled Company Reporter has previously reported that the
Debtor sought for an extension of its exclusive period within which
to file a Chapter 11 plan for an additional 90 days to February 23,
2018, and until May 3, 2018, to solicit acceptances of its plan.

The Debtor explained that its size and debt structure are not
particularly complicated. However, its exit strategy for a
successful Chapter 11 is complicated because of the loss of its
principal pre-petition customer, the Cancer Center of America
("CTCA").

According to the Debtor, to successfully reorganize, it must:

     (a) find a new customer base for long term operations as a
hotel;

     (b) have new revenue sources to replace the CTCA business in
order to facilitate a prospective sale of the business; or

     (c) find a buyer or joint venture partner to move forward with
transitioning the current hotel to more productive use as a senior
living or assisted living facility.

Market Square said it will necessarily take additional time for the
Debtor to replace the lost CTCA business and at the same time
proceed with the evaluation of the feasibility of converting the
hotel to a congregate living or assisted living facility.

The Debtor said it needed time to stabilize the Property and also
to perform the due diligence required to evaluate the contemplated
conversion to a new use. The Debtor has also expected to market the
Property for sale pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 363 or become a
joint venture partner with a developer that already is in the
congregate living assisted living market place.

                 About Market Square Hospitality

Market Square Hospitality, LLC, operates a hotel at 2723 Sheridan
Rd, Zion, Illinois 60099, USA, known as "The Inn At Market
Square".

Market Square Hospitality filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Case No. 17-22394) on July 27, 2017,
estimating its assets at up to $50,000 and its liabilities at
between $1 million and $10 million.  The petition was signed by
David Delach and Richard Delisle, managers.

Judge Janet S. Baer presides over the case.

Abraham Brustein, Esq., and Julia Jensen Smolka, Esq., at Dimonte &
Lizak, LLC, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions as Claims Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and its affiliates seek permission
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to hire
Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC as their claims and noticing agent.

Services to be rendered by Epiq are:

     (a) prepare and serve required notices and documents in the
chapter 11 cases in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the
Bankruptcy Rules in the form and manner directed by the Debtors
and/or the Court, including (i) notice of the commencement of the
chapter 11 cases and the initial meeting of creditors under section
341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, (ii) notice of any claims bar date,
(iii) notices of transfers of claims, (iv) notices of objections to
claims and objections to transfers of claims, (v) notices of any
hearings on a disclosure statement and confirmation of the Debtors'
chapter 11 plan, including under Bankruptcy Rule 3017(d), (vi)
notice of the effective date of any plan, and (vii) all other
notices, orders, pleadings, publications and other documents as the
Debtors or Court may deem necessary or appropriate for an orderly
administration of these chapter 11 cases;

     (b) maintain an official copy of the Debtors' schedules of
assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs, listing
the Debtors' known creditors and the amounts owed thereto;

     (c) maintain (i) a list of all potential creditors, equity
holders and other parties in interest and (ii) a "core" mailing
list consisting of all parties described in Bankruptcy Rule
2002(i), (j) and (k) and those parties that have filed a notice of
appearance pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9010, and update and make
the lists available upon request by a party in interest or the
Clerk;

     (d) furnish a notice to all potential creditors of the last
date for filing proofs of claim and a form for filing a proof of
claim, after such notice and form are approved by the Court, and
notify said potential creditors of the existence, amount and
classification of their respective claims as set forth in the
Schedules, which may be effected by inclusion of such information
on a customized proof of claim form provided to potential
creditors;

     (e) maintain a post office box or address for the purpose of
receiving claims and returned mail, and process all mail received;

     (f) for all notices, motions, orders or other pleadings or
documents served, prepare and file or cause to be filed with the
Clerk an affidavit or certificate of service within seven days of
service, which includes (i) either a copy of the notice served or
the docket number(s) and title(s) of the pleading(s) served, (ii) a
list of persons to whom it was mailed with their addresses, (iii)
the manner of service, and (iv) the date served;

     (g) process all proofs of claim received, including those
received by the Clerk, check said processing for accuracy and
maintain the original proofs of claim in a secure area;

     (h) maintain an electronic platform for purposes of filing
proofs of claim;

     (i) maintain the official claims register for each Debtor on
behalf of the Clerk, and upon the Clerk's request, provide the
Clerk with certified, duplicate unofficial Claims Registers, and
specify in the Claims Registers the following information for each
claim docketed: (i) the claim number assigned, (ii) the date
received, (iii) the name and address of the claimant and agent, if
applicable, who filed the claim, (iv) the amount asserted, (v) the
asserted classification(s) of the claim (e.g., secured, unsecured,
priority, etc.), (vi) the applicable Debtor, and (vii) any
disposition of the claim;

     (j) provide public access to the Claims Registers, including
complete proofs of claim with attachments, if any, without charge;


     (k) implement necessary security measures to ensure the
completeness and integrity of the Claims Registers and the
safekeeping of the original claims;

     (l) record all transfers of claims and provide any notices of
such transfers as required by Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e); provided,
however, that if any evidence of transfer of claim is filed with
the Court pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e), and if the evidence
of transfer or notice thereof executed by the parties purports to
waive the 21-day notice and objection period required under
Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e), then Epiq may process the transfer of
claim(s) to change the name and address of the claimant of such
claim to reflect the transfer, and the effective date of such
transfer will be the date the evidence of such transfer was
docketed in the case;

     (m) relocate, by messenger or overnight delivery, all of the
court-filed proofs of claim to the offices of Epiq, not less than
weekly;

     (n) upon completion of the docketing process for all claims
received to date for each case, turn over to the Clerk copies of
the Claims Registers for the Clerk's review;

     (o) monitor the Court's docket for all notices of appearance,
address changes, and claims-related pleadings and orders filed and
make necessary notations on and/or changes to the Claims Registers
and any service or mailing lists, including to identify and
eliminate duplicative names and addresses from such lists;

     (p) assist in the dissemination of information to the public
and respond to requests for administrative information regarding
these chapter 11 cases as directed by the Debtors or the Court,
including through the use of a case website and/or call center;

     (q) if any or all of these chapter 11 cases are converted to
cases under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, contact the Clerk
within three (3) days of notice to Epiq of entry of the order
converting the cases;

     (r) thirty (30) days prior to the close of these chapter 11
cases, to the extent practicable, request that the Debtors submit
to the Court a proposed order dismissing Epiq as Claims Agent and
terminating its services in such capacity upon completion of its
duties and responsibilities and upon the closing of these chapter
11 cases;

     (s) within seven days of notice to Epiq of entry of an order
closing these chapter 11 cases, provide to the Court the final
version of the Claims Registers as of the date immediately before
the close of the chapter 11 cases; and

     (t) at the close of these chapter 11 cases, box and transport
all original documents, in proper format, as provided by the
Clerk's, to (i) the Federal Archives Record Administration, located
at 14700 Townsend Road, Philadelphia, PA 19154-1096 or (ii) any
other location requested by the Clerk.

Kathryn Tran, director of Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, attests
that Epiq is a "disinterested person" as that term is defined in
section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code with respect to the matters
upon which it is engaged.

Epiq Systems's pricing schedule for its services:

     Clerical/Administrative Support        $25-$45
     IT/Programming                         $65-85
     Case Managers                          $70-$165
     Consultants/Directors/Vice Presidents  $160-$190
     Solicitation Consultant                $190
     EVP, Solicitation                      $215

                   About Maurice Sporting Goods

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., established in 1923, is a
family-owned distributor of outdoor sporting goods specializing in
fishing; marine; sports licensed products and souvenirs; outdoor
gifts and decor; hunting; and camping and outdoor recreation.
Collectively, Maurice Sporting Goods services more than 15,000
store fronts across the United States, Canada, South America, and
Europe.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and 4 affiliated companies sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12481) on
Nov. 20, 2017.  The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge
Christopher S. Sontchi.

Maurice Sporting Goods estimated $10 million to $50 million in
total assets and $100 million to $500 million in total
liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
counsel; Patrick J. O'Malley of Development Specialists, Inc., as
restructuring advisor; Silverman Consulting as financial advisor;
Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims, solicitation and balloting agent.


MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Livingstone as Investment Banker
--------------------------------------------------------
Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Livingstone Partners LLC, as investment banker
to the Debtors.

Maurice Sporting requires Livingstone to:

   a. assist the Debtors in the preparation and negotiation of
      any confidentiality agreements to be entered into by third
      parties potentially interested in participating in a
      Transactions, all of which shall be subject to the approval
      of the Debtors;

   b. upon the Debtors' approval, solicit and contact third
      parties potentially interested suitable for participating
      in a Transactions on the Debtors' behalf and, as
      appropriate, arrange for and orchestrate meetings between
      these parties and the Debtors;

   c. present to the Debtors all proposals from third parties
      potentially interested in participating in a Transactions
      and make recommendations as to the Debtors' appropriate
      negotiating strategy and course of conduct;

   d. assist in all negotiations and in all document review as
      reasonably requested and directed by the Debtors;

   e. assist in developing competitive bidding process and
      management of any auction; and

   f. provide other financial advisory and investment banking
      services as are customary for similar Transactions
      and as may be mutually agreed upon in advance by the
      and Livingstone.

Livingstone will be paid as follows:

   a. The Debtors shall pay Livingstone a monthly retainer fee
      (the "Monthly Fee") in the amount of $20,000 due, earned,
      and payable on the first (1st) of every month until the
      earlier of: (i) the consummation of a Transaction; (ii) or
      the termination of Livingstone's engagement. Any Monthly
      Fee payments received by Livingstone shall be in addition
      to any Company Sale Fee, Division Sale Fee, or Capital
      Raise Fee described below.

   b. Upon the consummation of either a Company Sale, Division
      Sale, or Capital Raise the Debtors shall pay to Livingstone
      an Accomplishment Fee as set forth below:

     i.    Upon the consummation of a Company Sale, the Debtors
           shall pay Livingstone a cash fee (the "Company Sale
           Fee")equal to 2.0% of Total Consideration;

     ii.   Upon the consummation of a Division Sale, the Debtors
           shall pay Livingstone a cash fee (the "Division Sale
           Fee") equal to the greater of (i) 4.0% of Total
           Consideration and (ii) $500,000; provided that, in the
           event that one or more Divisions are sold in multiple
           Transactions, Livingstone shall not be entitled to
           more than the $500,000 in Accomplishment Fees until
           such time as all Division Sales shall have generated
           aggregate Total Consideration in excess of $12,500,000
           (i.e., the Total Consideration amount that would
           generate a $500,000 Accomplishment Fee), in which case
           Livingstone will be entitled to additional
           Accomplishment Fee equal to 4.0% of the aggregate
           Total Consideration in excess of $12,500,000; provided
           further, the Division Sale Accomplishment Fee shall
           not be more than 2.0% of Total Consideration in the
           event the Debtors consummates a Division Sale and a
           Company Sale;

     iii.  Upon the consummation of a Capital Raise, the Debtors
           shall pay Livingstone a cash fee (the "Capital Raise
           Fee") equal to 3.0% of the committed amount of capital
           Raised;

     iv.   Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any Transaction
           qualifies in whole or in part as a Company Sale Fee,
           Division Sale Fee, and Capital Raise Fee, the
           aggregate amount of the Accomplishment Fee shall be
           the greater of the Company Sale Fee, Division Sale
           Fee, and Capital Raise Fee.

   c. Whether or not a Transaction is consummated, the Debtors
      will reimburse Livingstone for all reasonable and
      documented out-of-pocket expenses (including reasonable
      out-of-pocket fees and expenses of Livingstone's outside
      counsel, subject to the Debtors' prior approval of
      cumulative expenditures in excess of $15,000. Out-of-pocket
      expenses shall include all travel-related, telephone,
      facsimile, memoranda production costs, duplication,
      courier, database, research, and other similar expenses.

Joseph Greenwood, partner of Livingstone Partners LLC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Livingstone can be reached at:

     Joseph Greenwood
     LIVINGSTONE PARTNERS LLC
     443 North Clark, Suite 200
     Chicago, IL 60654
     Tel: (312) 670-5900

              About Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., established in 1923, is a
family-owned distributor of outdoor sporting goods specializing in
fishing; marine; sports licensed products and souvenirs; outdoor
gifts and decor; hunting; and camping and outdoor recreation.
Collectively, Maurice Sporting Goods services more than 15,000
store fronts across the United States, Canada, South America, and
Europe.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and 4 affiliated companies sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12481) on
Nov. 20, 2017.  The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge
Christopher S. Sontchi.

Maurice Sporting Goods estimated $10 million to $50 million in
total assets and $100 million to $500 million in total
liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
counsel; Patrick J. O'Malley of Development Specialists, Inc., as
restructuring advisor; Silverman Consulting as financial advisor;
Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims, solicitation and balloting agent.


MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Silverman as Financial Advisor
------------------------------------------------------
Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Silverman Consulting, Inc., as financial advisor
to the Debtors.

Maurice Sporting requires Silverman to:

   a. participate in the restructuring activities, including
      conferences with the Debtors and their advisors, with the
      primary focus on developing the overall restructuring
      strategy of the Debtors;

   b. maintain the cash flow model, conduct comparisons to actual
      performance, and provide updates as needed;

   c. interface with the Debtors' bank group and participate in
      bank discussions, meetings, and negotiations; as well as
      provide oversight of bank reporting;

   d. provide daily and weekly information to the banks as part
      of the forbearance agreement, including cash flow results,
      liquidity metrics, vendor activity, customer fill rate
      statistics, and related information that the banks may
      require;

   e. participate in vendor strategy and communication
      initiatives; coordinate sourcing and finance; cash plan as
      part of the implementation of the one-for-one program; and
      communicate with vendors in describing plans for future
      repayment;

   f. maintain and update the Debtors' projected cash
      flow/budget, including providing the bank group reporting,
      highlighting material variances, and explaining other such
      items requiring as needed; and

   g. participate in any other discussions and activities with
      the Debtors as may be beneficial to the Debtors in the
      chapter 11 cases.

Silverman will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Michael A. Silverman                      $400
     Dustin Bernstein                          $140

Prior to the Petition Date, Silverman had received $1,204,240 in
total fees and expenses from the Debtors since December 2015, with
$760,210 of this amount being received in the current calendar
year.  As of the Petition Date, Silverman held a retainer of 7,900,
and is not owed a pre-petition claim by the Debtors.

Silverman will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Michael A. Silverman, founder of Silverman Consulting, Inc.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

Silverman can be reached at:

     Michael A. Silverman
     SILVERMAN CONSULTING, INC.
     5750 Old Orchard Road, Suite 52
     Skokie, IL 60077
     Tel: (847) 470-0200
     Fax: (847) 470-0211

              About Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., established in 1923, is a
family-owned distributor of outdoor sporting goods specializing in
fishing; marine; sports licensed products and souvenirs; outdoor
gifts and decor; hunting; and camping and outdoor recreation.
Collectively, Maurice Sporting Goods services more than 15,000
store fronts across the United States, Canada, South America, and
Europe.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and 4 affiliated companies sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12481) on
Nov. 20, 2017.  The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge
Christopher S. Sontchi.

Maurice Sporting Goods estimated $10 million to $50 million in
total assets and $100 million to $500 million in total
liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
counsel; Patrick J. O'Malley of Development Specialists, Inc., as
restructuring advisor; Silverman Consulting as financial advisor;
Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims, solicitation and balloting agent.


MAURICE SPORTING: Hires Young Conaway as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware to employ Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as counsel
to the Debtors.

Maurice Sporting requires Young Conaway to:

   a. provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' powers
      and duties as debtors in possession in the continued
      operation of their businesses, management of their
      properties, and any sale of their assets;

   b. prepare and pursue confirmation of any chapter 11 plan and
      approval of any related disclosure statement;

   c. prepare, on behalf of the Debtors, necessary applications,
      motions, answers, orders, reports, and other legal papers;

   d. appear in Court and protect the interests of the Debtors
      before the Court; and

   e. perform all other legal services for the Debtors that may
      be necessary and proper in these proceedings.

Young Conaway will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Robert S. Brady, Partner           $890
     Michael R. Nestor, Partner         $820
     Justin H. Rucki, Associate         $495
     Ashley E. Jacobs, Associate        $430
     Tara C. Pakrouh, Associate         $340
     Debbie Laskin, Paralegal           $270

On October 5, 2017, Young Conaway received an initial retainer in
the amount of $100,000 in connection with the planning and
preparation of initial documents, its proposed postpetition
representation of the Debtors, and chapter 11 filing fees.  On
October 19, Young Conaway received an additional retainer payment
in the amount of $200,000.

Additionally, Young Conaway received $160,632.50 on October 31 and
$126,152.99 on November 15 to replenish the Retainer.

After reconciliation of any outstanding balances existing as of the
Petition Date, Young Conaway will continue to hold the remainder of
the Retainer as a general retainer as security for postpetition
services and expenses.

Young Conaway will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Robert S. Brady, a partner of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtors and their
estates.

Young Conaway can be reached at:

     Robert S. Brady, Esq.
     Michael R. Nestor, Esq.
     Justin H. Rucki, Esq.
     Ashley E. Jacobs, Esq.
     Tara C. Pakrouh, Esq.
     YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
     Rodney Square, 1000 North King Street
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302) 571-6600
     Fax: (302) 571-1253

              About Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., established in 1923, is a
family-owned distributor of outdoor sporting goods specializing in
fishing; marine; sports licensed products and souvenirs; outdoor
gifts and decor; hunting; and camping and outdoor recreation.
Collectively, Maurice Sporting Goods services more than 15,000
store fronts across the United States, Canada, South America, and
Europe.

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and 4 affiliated companies sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12481) on
Nov. 20, 2017.  The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge
Christopher S. Sontchi.

Maurice Sporting Goods estimated $10 million to $50 million in
total assets and $100 million to $500 million in total
liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
counsel; Patrick J. O'Malley of Development Specialists, Inc., as
restructuring advisor; Silverman Consulting as financial advisor;
Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims, solicitation and balloting agent.


MAURICE SPORTING: U.S. Trustee Forms Seven-Member Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on Nov. 28
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Maurice Sporting
Goods, Inc., and its affiliates.

The committee members are:

     (1) Rocking P Inc.
         Attn: Mark Mansfield
         301 Barn Side Ln.
         Eureka, MO 63025
         Tel: (314) 308-9898

     (2) Yuan Huang Co., Ltd.
         Attn: Jake Lu
         153 Chun Fu Ln. Chun Tsu Village, Siu Swei
         Changhua, Taiwan 50405
         Tel: (886) 4-7692348
         Fax: (886) 4-7696414

     (3) Normark
         Attn: Ryan Rohrbach
         10395 Yellow Circle Drive
         Minnetonka, MN 55343
         Tel: (952) 939-4372
         Fax: (952) 933-7329

     (4) Harrison Hoge Industries Inc.
         Attn: John Hoge
         19 N. Columbia Street, Suite 1
         Port Jefferson, NY 11777
         Tel: (631) 473-7308
         Fax: (631) 473-7398

     (5) Sheldons' Inc.
         Attn: John M. Sheldon
         626 Center Street
         Antigo, WI 54409
         Tel: (715) 623-2382,
         Fax: (715) 623-3001

     (6) Thermacell Repellants, Inc.
         Attn: Thomas Paganetti, CFO
         26 Crosby Drive
         Bedford, MA 01730
         Tel: (781) 430-5257
         Fax: (781) 541-6007

     (7) Shandong WeiHai Huanqiu Fishing
         Tackle Industrial Co., Ltd.
         Attn: Rose Bi
         18351 Colima Road, # 2880
         Rowland Heights, CA 91748

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense.  They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs.  Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                   About Maurice Sporting Goods

Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., established in 1923, is a
family-owned distributor of outdoor sporting goods specializing in
fishing; marine; sports licensed products and souvenirs; outdoor
gifts and decor; hunting; and camping and outdoor recreation.

Collectively, Maurice Sporting Goods services more than 15,000
store fronts across the United States, Canada, South America, and
Europe.

On Nov. 20, 2017, Maurice Sporting Goods, Inc., and 4 affiliated
companies sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case
No. 17-12481).

The Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge Christopher S.
Sontchi.

Maurice Sporting Goods estimated $10 million to $50 million in
total assets and $100 million to $500 million in total
liabilities.

The Debtors tapped Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, as
counsel; Patrick J. O'Malley of Development Specialists, Inc., as
restructuring advisor; Silverman Consulting as financial advisor;
Livingstone Partners LLC as investment banker; and Epiq Bankruptcy
Solutions, LLC, as claims, solicitation and balloting agent.  Epiq
maintains the site http://dm.epiq11.com/#/case/MAU


MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS: John Mendelsohn Resigns as Director
--------------------------------------------------------------
John Mendelsohn, M.D. provided notice of his resignation from the
Board of Directors of Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., effective as
of Nov. 29, 2017, according to a Form 8-K report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

On that date, the Board elected George Demetri, M.D. as a director
of the Company to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of
Dr. Mendelsohn.  Dr. Demetri was also elected to serve on the
Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board.

                      About Merrimack

Cambridge, Mass.-based Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. --
http://www.merrimack.com/-- is a biopharmaceutical company
discovering, developing and commercializing innovative medicines
consisting of novel therapeutics paired with diagnostics for the
treatment of cancer.  The Company was founded by a team of
scientists from The Massachusetts Institute of Technology and
Harvard University who sought to develop a systems biology-based
approach to biomedical research.  The Company's initial focus is in
the field of oncology.  The Company has five programs in clinical
development.  In it most advanced program, the Company is
conducting a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial.

The report from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, includes an explanatory paragraph stating that the
Company has negative working capital and cash outflows from
operating activities that raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.

Merrimack reported a net loss of $153.5 million in 2016, a net loss
of $147.8 million in 2015 and a net loss of $83.55 million in 2014.
As of Sept. 30, 2017, Merrimack had $197.84 million in total
assets, $86.21 million in total liabilities and $111.63 million in
total stockholders' equity.


METROPOLITAN DIAGNOSTIC: Seeks Interim OK on Cash Collateral Use
----------------------------------------------------------------
Metropolitan Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Medical
Imaging, Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Illinois for the interim use of cash
collateral.

The Debtor needs funding to pay the necessary costs associated with
the operation of its business.

The Debtor requests that the Court conduct a preliminary hearing,
instanter, on the Cash Collateral Motion and set this matter for
final hearing for December 19, 2017, at 10:30 a.m.

The Debtor asserts that it lacks funds with which to fund this
Chapter 11, and specifically with which to continue the operations
of its business without the continued use of the Cash Collateral.
As such, the Debtor needs access to its post-petition receipts in
order to pay employees, independent contractors for imaging reading
services, insurance, and other necessary expenses associated with
and necessary for the operation of its business.

To assist the Debtor in continuing with its operations and to
propose a plan of reorganization, the Debtor requires the use of
cash collateral in the approximate amount of $75,230 as set forth
on the Budget.

The Bancorp Bank asserts a perfected security interest in the
collateral pursuant to a Loan Agreement, U.S. Small Business
Administration Note and U.S. Small Business Association Security
Agreement. The approximate balance due and owing to Bancorp is
$1,079,826, which is secured by a lien on the assets of the Debtor,
including equipment, fixtures, inventory, accounts, instruments,
chattel paper, general intangibles, together with all replacements,
accessions, proceeds and products.

As and for adequate protection for the interests of Bancorp in the
collateral, the Debtor proposes that:

      (a) Bancorp will be granted valid and perfected replacement
liens in and to post-petition cash collateral and all post-petition
property of the Debtor of the same type or kind substantially
equivalent to the pre-petition collateral (excepting avoidance
actions of the estate) to the same extent and with the same
priority as held pre-petition; and,

      (b) Insurance will be maintained on the collateral and the
policy will reflect Bancorp as a lienholder and loss payee.

A full-text copy of the Debtor's Motion and Budget are available
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-35285-3.pdf

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/ilnb17-35285-3-bgt.pdf

                   About Metropolitan Diagnostic Imaging Inc.

Based in Chicago, Illinois, Advanced Medical Imaging Center --
https://www.amic-chicago.com/ -- has been providing radiological
services since 1985.  Its services include diagnostic breast MRI,
digital screening mammography, high field MRI/MRA, open MRI/MRA,
digital general x-ray, ultrasound, multi-detector CT/CTA, DEXA and
fluoroscopy/arthrography.

Metropolitan Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Medical
Imaging, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 Petition (Bank. N.D. Ill. Case No.
17-35285) on November 28, 2017, disclosing $1 million to $10
million in both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by
Moqueet Syed, president.

The case is assigned to Judge Timothy A. Barnes.

The Debtor is represented by Monica C O'Brien, Esq. and Gregory K
Stern, Esq. at Gregory K. Stern, P.C.


MOTORS LIQUIDATION: Bares $9M Wind Down Expense Budget for 2018
---------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Motors Liquidation
Company GUC Trust Agreement dated as of July 30, 2015 and between
the parties thereto, as amended, and that certain Order Authorizing
the GUC Trust Administrator to Liquidate New GM Securities for the
Purpose of Funding Fees, Costs and Expenses of the GUC Trust and
the Avoidance Action Trust, dated March 8, 2012 issued by the
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, Wilmington
Trust Company, in its capacity as trust administrator and trustee
of the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust is required to provide
on an annual basis the projected budgets for certain categories of
expenses, other than Reporting and Transfer Costs, to FTI
Consulting, Inc., in its capacity as the trust monitor of the GUC
Trust, to the DIP Lenders, and to certain additional parties
specified in the Liquidation Order.

Total wind down expense for calendar year 2018 is expected to be
$9.05 million consisting of $2.24 million for governance costs,
$4.07 million for financial reporting & claims resolution, $447,000
for investment, accounting & tax advisors and $2.28 million for
other expenses.

Total reporting costs budget for calendar year 2018 is $5.27
million.

Copies of the calendar-year 2018 budgets for Wind-Down Costs and
for Reporting and Transfer Costs are available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/HtGJQ1

The budgets are subject to revision by the GUC Trust Administrator,
according to the procedures specified in the GUC Trust Agreement.
Those budgets were developed based upon assumptions and estimates
about future events which could change in the future due to various
risks and uncertainties, including those specified under the
heading "Forward Looking Statements" in Item 2 ("Management's
Discussion and Analysis") of the Form 10-Q filed on November 13,
2017, and in Item 1A ("Risk Factors") of the Form 10-K filed on May
25, 2017.  As a result, actual Wind-Down Costs and Reporting and
Transfer Costs could be materially higher or lower than the amounts
presented, which could materially affect the value of the units of
beneficial interest in the GUC Trust.

                   About Motors Liquidation

General Motors Corporation and three of its affiliates filed for
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 09-50026) on
June 1, 2009.  The Honorable Robert E. Gerber presides over the
Chapter 11 cases.  Harvey R. Miller, Esq., Stephen Karotkin, Esq.,
and Joseph H. Smolinsky, Esq., at Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP,
assist the Debtors in their restructuring efforts.  Al Koch at AP
Services, LLC, an affiliate of AlixPartners, LLP, serves as the
Chief Executive Officer for Motors Liquidation Company.  GM is also
represented by Jenner & Block LLP and Honigman Miller Schwartz and
Cohn LLP as counsel.  Cravath, Swaine, & Moore LLP is providing
legal advice to the GM Board of Directors.  GM's financial advisors
are Morgan Stanley, Evercore Partners and the Blackstone Group LLP.
Garden City Group is the claims and notice agent of the Debtors.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors and a separate Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Holding Asbestos-Related Claims.  Lawyers at Kramer Levin Naftalis
& Frankel LLP served as bankruptcy counsel to the Creditors
Committee.  Attorneys at Butzel Long served as counsel on supplier
contract matters.  FTI Consulting Inc. served as financial advisors
to the Creditors Committee.  Elihu Inselbuch, Esq., at Caplin &
Drysdale, Chartered, represented the Asbestos Committee.  Legal
Analysis Systems, Inc., served as asbestos valuation analyst.

The Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming the Debtors'
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan on March 29, 2011.  The Plan
was declared effect on March 31.

On Dec. 15, 2011, Motors Liquidation Company was dissolved.  On the
Dissolution Date, pursuant to the Plan and the Motors Liquidation
Company GUC Trust Agreement, dated March 30, 2011, between the
parties thereto, the trust administrator and trustee -- GUC Trust
Administrator -- of the Motors Liquidation Company GUC Trust,
assumed responsibility for the affairs of and certain claims
against MLC and its debtor subsidiaries that were not concluded
prior to the Dissolution Date.


MULTICARE HOME: Must Show Cause Necessity of PCO Appointment
------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Harlin DeWayne Hale of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Texas will hold a hearing on December 11,
2017, at 1:30 p.m., to determine the issue of whether or not a
patient care ombudsman will be appointed for the protection of the
patients of Multicare Home Health Services, LLC.

The Debtor is required to furnish the following information to the
governmental regulatory authority:

       A. All license numbers or other regulatory identification
numbers;

       B. All DBAs or trade names under which the Debtor operates;

       C. Location of all of the Debtor's operating facilities,
including street and P.O. Box addresses.

The Debtor will also send said information to:

            The Office of the Texas Attorney General
            Attn: Managing Attorney
            Bankruptcy Regulatory Section
            P.O. Box 12548, MC 008
            Austin Texas 78711

             About Multicare Home Health Services

Multicare Home Health provides home health care services including
nursing, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology,
medical social, home health aide. The company previously sought
bankruptcy protection on June 21, 2017 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No.
17-32419).

Multicare Home Health Services, LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-34205), on November 6, 2017. The
petition was signed by Gloria Wilson, managing member. The case is
assigned to Judge Harlin DeWayne Hale. The Debtor is represented by
Joyce W. Lindauer Attorney, PLLC as counsel. At the time of filing,
the Debtor had $50,000 to $100,000 in estimated assets and $1
million to $10 million in estimated liabilities.


N3C INC: Hires EisnerAmper as Accountant
----------------------------------------
H3C, Inc. d/b/a Left Coast Kitchen & Cocktails seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York to
employ EisnerAmper, LLP as accountants.

Services required of EisnerAmper are:

     (a) monitor the activities of the Debtor;

     (b) assist in or the preparation of and/or review the monthly
operating reports, budgets and projections;

     (c) review the filed claims for reasonableness against the
Debtor's records and filing schedules;

     (d) interact with the Creditors' Committee and its retained
professionals, should one be appointed;

     (e) attend meetings with the Debtor and its Counsel, meetings
with the Creditors and Court hearings;

     (f) assist in the preparation of the Plan of Reorganization
and the Disclosure Statement;

     (g) provide assistance as the Debtor and its counsel may deem
necessary.

EisnerAmper's standard rates are:

     Partner               $550 - $620 per hour
     Director              $545 - $550 per hour
     Senior Manager        $410 - $410 per hour
     Manager               $330 - $340 per hour
     Senior                $210 - $270 per hour
     Staff Assistants/     $125 to $270 per hour    
     Paraprofessionals

Ira Spiegel, CPA, director of EisnerAmper, LLP, attests that
Eisner, and its partners and associates are "disinterested persons"
as that term is defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code;
and do not hold or represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's
estate.

The Accountant can be reached through:

     Ira Spiegel, CPA
     EisnerAmper, LLP
     750 Third Avenue
     New York, NY 10017
     Phone: 212-949-8700

                          About H3C, Inc.

Based in Merrick, New York, H3C, Inc. d/b/a Left Coast Kitchen &
Cocktails filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
Case No. 16-77027) on November 14, 2017, listing under $1 million
both in assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is represented by Neil
H Ackerman at Ackerman Fox, LLP, as counsel.


NAVILLUS TILE: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
William K. Harrington, the U.S. Trustee for Region 2, on Nov. 28
appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of Navillus Tile, Inc.

The committee members are:

     (1) NYC District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds
         Attn: Luke Powers, Employer Services Director
         395 Hudson Street
         New York, New York 10014
         Tel: (212) 366-7409

     (2) Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Funds
         Attn: Michael Salgo, Trustee
         35-30 Francis Lewis Boulevard
         Flushing, New York 11358
         Tel: (718) 762-6133

     (3) District Council of New York City &
         Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters
         Attn: James M. Murphy, General Counsel
         395 Hudson Street - 9th Floor
         New York, New York 10014
         Tel: (212) 366-7400

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense.  They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs.  Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                       About Navillus Tile

Navillus Tile Inc., is one of the largest subcontractors and
general contractors in New York, specializing as a high-end
concrete and masonry subcontractor on large private and public
construction projects in the New York metropolitan area.  Navillus
works closely with many of New York's most prominent architects,
builders, owners, government agencies and institutions and is
pre-qualified by numerous commercial and government agencies.

Navillus operates its business from a midtown Manhattan
headquarters which it has leased since 2015.

Donal O'Sullivan, which founded the business with his brothers, is
the sole director, president and chief executive officer of
Navillus.

Navillus Tile filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-13162) on Nov. 8, 2017, estimating $100 million to $500
million in assets and debt.   Judge Sean H. Lane is the case judge.
Cullen and Dykman LLP is the Debtor's counsel.


NAVITAS MIDSTREAM: Fitch Assigns First Time B Long-Term IDR
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned a first time 'B' Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating to Navitas Midstream Midland Basin, LLC.
Additionally Fitch has assigned 'BB'/'RR1' ratings to Navitas'
proposed $50 million super senior secured revolving credit facility
and $350 million Term Loan B. The ratings reflect Navitas' limited
size and scale as well as its position as a single basin focused
G&P service provider with moderate customer concentration risk,
volumetric risk and both direct and indirect commodity price
exposure.

The ratings reflect Fitch's expectations for strong growth across
Navitas' producer customer base within Navitas' dedicated service
acreage. As a result of this volume growth, Fitch's ratings also
reflect an expectation that leverage at Navitas will improve from
its expected high initial 2018 year-end Fitch forecast of above
8.0x to roughly 5.0x by the end of 2019. This rapid deleveraging
will be achieved largely by growth in production volumes across
Navitas' system, as well as mandatory amortization and a cash sweep
expected to be placed on the term loan. Fitch views Navitas' cash
sweep and six-month debt service reserve account to be favorable.
The 'BB'/'RR1' rating for the proposed senior secured term loan and
super senior secured revolver reflects Fitch's expectation for
outstanding recovery (91% to 100%) for the secured term loan in the
event of default.

Concerns are focused on the limited size/scale, counterparty risk,
and the possibility that volume growth will not materialize in the
projected amounts, weighing on profitability and exacerbating
initially high leverage. Refinancing risk is a longer-term concern,
but liquidity is expected to be adequate.

Navitas is the second largest privately held natural gas gathering
and processing company in the Midland basin with assets spanning
Howard, Martin, Midland, Glasscock, and Upton counties. Navitas'
assets include 1,570 miles of natural gas, NGL, and condensate
pipelines and 325 MMcf/d of natural gas processing capacity. The
company has long-term acreage dedications across approximately
356,000 acres. Navitas gathers associated gas from oil production
in the Midland basin. The acreage dedications provide some comfort
that volumes will flow through Navitas' system, provided production
occurs.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Small, Single Basin Provider: Navitas' size and scale is limited
and generally consistent with a 'B' range Issuer Default Rating.
Fitch believes this limited size and scale to be offset in part by
Navitas' operational focus within the Midland region of the Permian
basin, which is expected to continue to see significant production
growth in the near to intermediate term. Fitch expects Midland
region production from Navitas' customers to continue to grow in
the near to intermediate term and that Navitas will be a
beneficiary of this growth. However, given its single basin focus,
Navitas is subject to outsized event risk should there be a
slowdown in or longer-term disruption of Midland Basin area
production.

Elevated Initial Leverage, Negative Free Cash Flow: Navitas'
initial leverage is expected to be high, with 2018 debt/EBITDA
above 8x based of Fitch expectations; however, it is expected to
improve dramatically as volumes increase. Any slowdowns in volume
growth or negative operating results have the potential to slow any
projected deleveraging and further stress high leverage and low
coverage metrics limiting operating flexibility. Fitch does project
rapid deleveraging over the course of the next several years (2018
- 2020) as volumes along Navitas' system grow significantly.
Producer activity along Navitas' dedicated acreage supports this
volume growth; however, low commodity prices, slower than expected
well completions or producer focus elsewhere in their drilling
portfolios all have the potential to hamper volume growth.

Competitive Risks: Navitas is located in and around a significant
amount of competing existing infrastructure, which could provide a
significant amount of competition on new opportunities within
Navitas' operating region. The G&P space is and has recently been a
very competitive space with low barriers to entry. Offsetting some
of the immediate competitive risks is the roughly 356,500 acres
dedicated by its producer counterparties to Navitas' operations.

Counterparty Exposure & Volumetric Risk: Navitas operations are
supported by long-term acreage dedications with six core
counterparties supporting the bulk of its volumes and expected
volume growth. These counterparties range in credit quality from
high-yield single 'B' to 'BB' category small producer names such as
Endeavor Energy Resources (Endeavor), SM Energy (SM), Hunt Oil
Company (Hunt), and QEP Resources (QEP; BB/Stable) to larger
investment grade names Apache Corp. (APA; BBB/Positive Outlook) and
Encana Corp. (ECA; BBB-/Stable). Most of the initial growth on the
system is expected to be driven by some of the smaller names in the
counterparty portfolio with Endeavor, SM, QEP, and Hunt expected to
account for of the majority 2018 volume growth. Rig activity on
dedicated acreage indicates a high probability that near-term
volume growth should materialize in 2018, with 24 rigs currently
running on Navitas acreage. However, flattening productivity gains
and slower than expected completion activity has led to slower than
expected volume growth across the Permian basin with several
competing gathering and processing systems experiencing lower than
expected volumes. There remains a risk that Navitas could face
similar headwinds with respect to volume growth. Longer term, lower
than expected commodity prices or better opportunities within
producer portfolios have the potential to weigh on volume growth
across Navitas' dedicated acreage. Fitch does believe that the
Navitas system and its dedicated acreage is well positioned within
the Midland basin where drilling economics will favor production
within each producer's dedicated acreage.

Modest Commodity Price Exposure: Navitas' contracts are largely
fee-based; however, a portion of its evergreen and legacy contracts
(for existing production) are structured as percent of proceeds
(POP) contracts where Navitas will hold commodity price exposure.
Roughly 13% of 2018 volumes are POP contracts. Navitas is planning
to hedge its commodity price exposure, but does not currently have
any hedges in place and the availability of NGL product specific
hedges tends to be limited to 12 to 18 months given the lack of
liquidity in future contracts. Additionally, several of Navitas'
long-term fee based contracts have a floor price, which allows
Navitas to retain some upside. Navitas charges a minimum fee to
allow it to generate a minimum margin amount and retain some of the
upside from commodity prices. Fitch's current base case forecast
assumes that Navitas benefits from some of this upside at a $50/Bbl
WTI/$3.00 Mcf Henry Hub base case forecast, with NGLs assumed at
roughly 53% of WTI. Navitas' profitability could be negatively
affected if commodity prices fall below these levels.

Strong Recoveries: In its recovery forecast, Fitch utilized a
going-concern approach, using a 6.0x EBITDA multiple, consistent
with recent reorganization multiples for the energy sector (6.3x).
Reorganization multiples can vary widely based upon the commodity
price environment upon emergence, as well as company specific
factors that led to restructuring, including full-cycle cost
positions, untenable capital structures, or debt-funded M&A
activity. There have been a limited number of bankruptcies and
reorganizations within the midstream sector. Two recent gathering
and processing bankruptcies of companies with a short
pre-bankruptcy life (Southcross Holdings LP and Azure Midstream
Partners, LP) indicate that pro forma exit Enterprise Value over
pre-distress EBITDA provide an approximate range of multiples
between 3.5x and 7.0x. Another midstream bankruptcy was Semcrude
L.P., which had a midpoint EV/Post Emergence EBITDA multiple of
7.9x multiple according to Fitch's Energy, Power and Commodities
Bankruptcy Enterprise Value and Creditor Recoveries Special Report
(January 2017). Fitch's going concern EBITDA assumption is $68
million, which represents Fitch's expected 2019 base case EBITDA in
a $50Bbl WTI and $3.00Mcf Henry Hub as a mid-cycle estimate of
sustainable EBITDA. Using this going concern EBITDA recovery of
both the revolver (assuming it is fully drawn) and the term loan is
RR1 (91% to 100%) after assuming a 10% administrative claim.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Navitas ratings are limited by the size and scale of its system.
With Fitch expected EBITDA under $100 million annually for the next
two years and its single basin focus the Navitas credit profile and
rating reflect its counterparty credit risk and lack of diversity.
Generally, Fitch views small scale, single basin focused midstream
service providers with EBITDA below $100 million as being
consistent with 'B' category issuer default ratings.

Navitas' leverage metrics are initially high, similar to Permian
focused gas gathering and processing peer BCP Raptor/EagleClaw
(BB-/Stable Outlook). Although Fitch expects Navitas' 2018 leverage
will be significantly higher than EagleClaw's, both companies are
expected to de-lever rapidly, supported by production from the
Permian basin. Navitas' operations are smaller than EagleClaw's
currently, and following expected growth through 2020, will have
lower cash flow and processing capacity. Navitas' counter party
exposure is largely concentrated in Endeavor Energy Resources (not
publicly rated) and SM Energy (not publicly rated) with offsetting
exposure to larger investment grade names like APA and ECA,
reflecting a moderately riskier, and slightly greater concentrated
counterparty profile than EagleClaw or Medallion Midstream
Acquisition, LLC (BB-/Stable), the majority of whose volumes are
expected to come from 'BB' or higher rated issuers.

Fitch expects Navitas to remain free cash flow negative through
2020, as it continues to invest in its system and connect wells.
This free cash flow negativity is slightly longer than recently
rated 'BB-' IDR systems Medallion, which will flip to FCF positive
next year and BCP Raptor, which Fitch forecasts as being free cash
flow positive by the end of 2019.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within the agency's rating case for the
issuer include:
-- Commodity prices consistent with Fitch's base case price deck:

    WTI oil price that trends up from $50/barrel in 2017 to a
    long-term price of $55/barrel; Henry Hub gas price that trends

    up from $3.00/mcf in 2017 to a long-term price of $3.25/mcf;
-- Cumulative maintenance and growth spending between $450
    million to $500 million for the period 2018 - 2021.
-- Volume growth through 2022, No new acreage dedications or new
    producer customers assumed. Fitch slowed volume growth in 2018

    and 2019 versus management expectations.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action
-- Positive free cash flow (before distributions) generation
    combined with a meaningful improvement in leverage
    (debt/EBITDA) to below 5.0x on a sustained basis;
-- Positive improvement in counterparty credit quality.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action
-- Slowdown in volume growth expected across Navitas' acreage, as

    evidenced by a decline in rig count or a moderation in daily
    volumes through Navitas system;
-- Significant cost overruns on expected growth capital
    expenditures;
-- Meaningful deterioration in counterparty credit quality or a
    significant event at a major counterparty that impairs cash
    flow;
-- 2019 Leverage above 6.0x. Fitch expects 2018 leverage (Total
    Debt/to trailing 12 month EBITDA) above 8.0x in 2018, but
    falling to 5.0x and below in 2019, should leverage be expected

    to be at or above 6.0x in 2019 without clear visibility on
    lowering leverage to below 6.0x Fitch would likely take
    negative rating action;
-- Significant decline in commodity prices below $50/oil;
    $3.00/gas;
-- A significant change in cash flow stability profile. A move
    away from current significant majority of revenue being fee
    based.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity Adequate: Navitas is arranging a $50 million Senior
Secured Super Priority Revolver in support of its liquidity.
Additionally the Term Loan will have a six-month Debt Service
Reserve Account (DSRA). Warburg Pincus and its co-investors (the
Sponsors) have a committed equity line of $900 million to support
Navitas over time (with $262 million remaining for investment).
Fitch believes that this is more than adequate liquidity for
Navitas to meet liquidity needs. Capital spending is expected to
moderate in late 2018 as the plant capacity project is completed.
Capex following plant completion will largely focus on new well
connects from existing acreage development and future processing
capacity expansion if and as needed. Covenants in the proposed
revolver require Navitas to maintain total debt to total
capitalization at 50% or below through March 31, 2019. Covenants at
March 31, 2019 require Navitas to maintain debt service coverage
above 1.1x and super senior leverage below 1.5x. Fitch expects
Navitas to maintain compliance with its covenants in the near to
intermediate term.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has assigned the following first time ratings:

Navitas Midstream Midland Basin, LLC
-- Long-term IDR 'B';
-- Super Senior Secured Revolver 'BB'/'RR1';
-- Senior Secured Term Loan 'BB'/'RR1'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

Navitas Midstream Midland Basin, LLC, is a Texas incorporated
privately owned natural gas gathering and processing company with
primary operations in the Midland, Martin, Howard, Glasscock and
Upton Counties of the Midland Basin. Navitas was formed in May 2014
and is 85% owned by Warburg Pincus.


NILHAN FINANCIAL: Hires Moffa & Breuer as Special Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Nilhan Financial, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida employ Stephen C. Breuer,
Esq., and the law firm of Moffa & Breuer, PLLC, as special
counsel.

The special counsel's proposed role in this case would be limited
to prosecuting two pending cases, Case Nos. 6:17-cv-01252, and
6:17-cv-01281.

The cases concern the valuation of a number of parcels owned by
debtors Orlando Gateway Partners, LLC, and Nilhan Hospitality, LLC,
and the resultant allocation of proceeds of the case of those
parcels.

The Attorneys will be compensated on an hourly basis, with rates
between $325 and $500 an hour.

Stephen C. Breuer, Esq., attests that neither he nor his firm hold
or represent any interest adverse to the estate upon the matters on
which they will be engaged, and he is a disinterested person as
required by 11 U.S.C. Sec. 327(e).

The Special Counsel can be reached through:

     Stephen C. Breuer, Esq.
     MOFFA & BREUER, PLLC
     1776 N Pine Island Rd 102
     Plantation, FL 33322
     Phone: 954-634-4733
     Fax: 954-337-0637
     Email: Stephen@moffa.law

                   About Nilhan Financial, LLC

An involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case
No. 17-13320) was filed against Nilhan Financial, LLC, by
petitioning creditor Moffa & Breuer, PLLC on March 20, 2017.

The Petitioning Creditor is represented by:

     John A. Moffa, Esq.
     Stephen C Breuer, Esq.
     Moffa & Breuer, PLLC
     1776 N Pine Island Road, Suite #102
     Plantation, FL 33322
     Tel: (954) 634-4733
     Fax: (954) 337-0637
     E-mail: John@moffa.law
             stephen@moffa.law

On April 27, venue of the case was transferred to the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa
Division, and assigned Case No. 17-03597, before Chief Judge
Michael G. Williamson.

The Alleged Debtor filed an Answer to the Petition and a hearing
was held on July 10, 2017, on whether the case would proceed.  The
Debtor made an ore tenus motion on July 10 to convert the Chapter 7
case to a case under Chapter 11. The Court entered a Chapter 11
conversion order on July 26.


NORTH FORK GROUP: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Nov. 28 disclosed in a court
filing that no official committee of unsecured creditors has been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of North Fork Group, LLC.

                     About North Fork Group LLC

North Fork Group, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D.S.C. Case No. 17-05600) on Nov. 6, 2017.
Judge David R. Duncan presides over the case.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $50,000 and liabilities of less than
$1 million.


OCEAN CLUB: Taps Jeffery C. Patrick as Accountant
-------------------------------------------------
Ocean Club of Walton County, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida to hire
Jeffery C. Patrick CPA, LLC as its accountant.

The firm will prepare the Debtor's federal income tax returns and
other required tax returns, and will provide other accounting
services in connection with the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

Jeffery Patrick, the accountant who will be providing the services,
charges an hourly fee of $225 for tax preparation, and $125 to $150
for bookkeeping and other accounting services.

Mr. Patrick disclosed in a court filing that his firm is
"disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jeffery C. Patrick  
     Jeffery C. Patrick CPA, LLC
     906 Mar Walt Drive, Suite E
     Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547
     Phone: (850) 226-7722
     Fax:  (888) 511-1325

                        About Ocean Club

Headquartered in Miramar Beach, Florida, Ocean Club of Walton
County, Inc. -- http://theoceanclubdestin.com/-- operates the  
Ocean Club seafood restaurant located at the entrance to Tops'l
Beach & Racquet Resort and across the street from Sandestin Golf
and Beach Resort in Destin.  The Ocean Club also provides live
entertainment from the Emerald Coast artists.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Fla. Case No. 17-31019) on Nov. 14, 2017, estimating its assets at
between $500,000 and $1 million and liabilities at between $1
million and $10 million.  The petition was signed by Cary Shahid,
its president. Judge Jerry C. Oldshue Jr. presides over the case.

Jodi Daniel Cooke, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler,
P.A., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


OCEAN CLUB: Taps Stichter Riedel as Legal Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Ocean Club of Walton County, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida to hire
Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A. as its legal counsel.

The firm will advise the Debtor regarding its duties under the
Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with potential financing sources; assist
in negotiations to formulate a plan of reorganization; and provide
other legal services related to its Chapter 11 case.

Stichter received a retainer in the sum of $21,717.

Jodi Daniel Cooke, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that the firm
is "disinterested" as defined in section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

The firm can be reached through:

     Jodi Daniel Cooke, Esq.
     Edward J. Peterson, Esq.
     Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A.
     41 N. Jefferson Street, Suite 111
     Pensacola, FL 32501
     Phone: (850) 637-1836
     Fax: (850) 791-6545
     Email: jcooke@srpb.com
     Email: epeterson@srbp.com

                         About Ocean Club

Headquartered in Miramar Beach, Florida, Ocean Club of Walton
County, Inc. -- http://theoceanclubdestin.com/-- operates the  
Ocean Club seafood restaurant located at the entrance to Tops'l
Beach & Racquet Resort and across the street from Sandestin Golf
and Beach Resort in Destin.  The restaurant's menu includes Smoked
Scottish Salmon, Steamed Prince Edward Island Mussels Provencale,
Buttermilk Fried Calamari, and Shrimp Cocktail.  The Ocean Club
prides itself on providing live entertainment from the Emerald
Coast artists.

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Fla. Case No. 17-31019) on Nov. 14, 2017, estimating its assets at
between $500,000 and $1 million and liabilities at between $1
million and $10 million.  The petition was signed by Cary Shahid,
president. Judge Jerry C. Oldshue Jr. presides over the case.

Jodi Daniel Cooke, Esq., at Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler,
P.A., serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


OHLONE TRIBE: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
-----------------------------------------------
Debtor: Ohlone Tribe of Carmel First Settlers of
        Chino Valley, CA Inc.
        10790 Civic Center Drive, Suite 202
        Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

Business Description: Based in Rancho Cucamonga, California,
                      Ohlone Tribe of Carmel First Settlers of
                      Chino Valley, CA Inc. is a small business
                      debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C Section 101
                      (51D) and is engaged in activities related
                      to real estate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: December 2, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Central District of California (Riverside)

Case No.: 17-19965

Judge: Hon. Mark D. Houle

Debtor's Counsel: Odeha L Warren, Esq.
                  LAW OFFICE OF ODEHA WARREN
                  31915 Ranco California Rd Ste 200179
                  Temecula, CA 92591
                  Tel: 951-216-5577
                  Fax: 888-665-2294
                  Email: odeha.warren@gmail.com

Total Assets: $7 million

Total Liabilities: $3.40 million

The petition was signed by David Vargas, CFO.

The Debtor failed to include a list of the names and addresses of
its 20 largest unsecured creditors together with the petition.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

           http://bankrupt.com/misc/cacb17-19965.pdf


OKEECHOBEE CC-I LAND: Case Summary & 9 Top Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor affiliates that filed separate Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petitions:

     Debtor                                     Case No.
     ------                                     --------
     Okeechobee CC-I Land Trust                 17-24481
     Attn: Barry M. Brant, Trustee
     200 S. Biscayne Blvd., 6th Floor
     Miami, FL 33131

     Okeechobee CC-II Land Trust                 17-24482

     Okeechobbee CC-III Land Trust               17-24483

Business Description: Based in Miami, Florida, the Debtors listed
                      their business as Single Asset Real Estate
                      (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B)).
                      The Debtors are affiliated with Lakeshore
                      Properties of South Florida, LLC, which
                      sought bankruptcy protection on Sept. 28,
                      2017 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-21866).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: December 3, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Florida (Miami)

Judge: Hon. Laurel M Isicoff

Debtors' Counsel: Nicholas B. Bangos, Esq.
                  NICHOLAS B. BANGOS, P.A.
                  2925 PGA Blvd, Suite 204
                  Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
                  Tel: 561-626-4700
                  Fax: 561-627-9479
                  Email: bazban13@gmail.com

Estimated Assets: $1 million to $10 million

Estimated Liabilities: $1 million to $10 million

The petition was signed by Barry M. Brant, trustee.

A full-text copy of Okeechobee CC-I Land Trust's petition
containing, among other items, a list of the Debtor's nine largest
unsecured creditors is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-22481.pdf


PAC ANCHOR: Committee Taps Armory Consulting as Financial Advisor
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of PAC Anchor
Transportation Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Central District of California to hire Armory Consulting
Company as the Committee's financial advisor.

Services to be rendered Armory are:

     a. monitor the Debtor's financial and operating performance
including current operations, monthly operating reports, and other
financial and operating analyses or periodic reports provided by
the Debtor;

     b. perform due diligence with respect to the assets and
liabilities, business, financial conditions, and opportunities for
the Debtor to enhance its value;

     c. assess cash and liquidity requirements of the Debtor;

     d. investigate potential causes of action, including avoidance
actions such as potentially preferential or fraudulent transfers
against insiders or third parties;

     e. analyze the potential values of the Debtor's assets and
businesses, the secured and unsecured claims, and the potential
recoveries to the unsecured creditors;

     f. assist in the negotiations, evaluation, and formulation of
any financial transaction, any proposed plan of reorganization, or
restructuring-related alternatives;

     g. assist the Committee in determining the best strategy for
maximizing values for creditors;

     h. to the extent necessary, provide testimony (including
deposition testimony) before the Bankruptcy Court on matters within
the Firm’s expertise; and

     i. provide other services to the Committee as may be necessary
in the Case.

James Y. Wong attests that Armory is a "disinterested person" as
that term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Mr. Wong's current billing rate is $475.00 per hour.  Armory has
agreed to discount Mr. Wong's rate by 10%, to $427.50 per hour. To
the extent any of Armory's senior consultants render services for
this matter, the firm has agreed to discount their standard billing
rate by 10%, ranging from $175.00 per hour to $350.00 per hour,
thus resulting in an hourly range of $157.50 to $315.00.

The Advisor can be reached through:

     James Y. Wong
     Armory Consulting Company
     3943 Irvine Blvd., #253
     Irvine, CA 92602
     Phone: (714) 222-5552 phone
     Emmail: jwong@armoryconsulting.com

                  About Pac Anchor Transportation

Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc. was formed from the merger of Pac
Anchor Transportation, Inc., and Green Anchor Lines, Inc.  Pac
Anchor is a trucking company located in Wilmington, California,
that provides trucking services throughout the western United
States.

Pac Anchor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-18213) on July 6, 2017.  Alfredo Barajas, its
president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $12.08 million in
assets and $11.24 million in liabilities.

Judge Ernest M. Robles presides over the case.  Haberbush &
Associates LLP represents the Debtor as legal counsel.  The Debtor
hired Trojan and Company Accountancy Corp. as its accountant.

On August 10, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


PARETEUM CORP: Gets $6.58M From Private Placement Financing
-----------------------------------------------------------
Pareteum Corporation agreed to sell an aggregate of 7,151,146
shares of the Company's common stock, $0.00001 par value per share.
The purchase price per share was $0.92.  The shares were offered
and are being sold to certain accredited investors in a registered
direct offering.  Concurrently, the Company agreed to sell in a
private placement, warrants to purchase an aggregate of 7,151,146
shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.09 per share with
a five year term.  The Company received gross proceeds from the
offering of approximately $6.58 million.

The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offering for
general working capital and corporate purposes and may include debt
repayment.

Dawson James Securities, Inc. served as placement agent for the
offering.

A registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the shares has
been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and
became effective on Nov. 14, 2016.  The offering was made only by
means of a prospectus.  Copies of the final prospectus relating to
this offering may be obtained by contacting Dawson James
Securities, Inc., Attention: Prospectus Department, 1 North Federal
Highway, 5th Floor, Boca Raton, FL 33432, mmaclaren@dawsonjames.com
or toll free at 866.928.0928, or by accessing the SEC's website at
www.sec.gov.

                      About Pareteum

New York-based Pareteum Corporation (NYSEMKT: TEUM), formerly known
as Elephant Talk Communications, Inc. -- http://www.pareteum.com--
is an international provider of business software and services to
the telecommunications and financial services industry.

Squar Milner, LLP, in Los Angeles, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has an
accumulated deficit of $287,080,234 and has negative working
capital.  This, according to the auditors, raises substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Pareteum incurred a net loss of $31.44 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, following a net loss of $5 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  The Company's balance sheet as of Sept. 30,
2017, showed $10.28 million in total assets, $15.16 million in
total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $4.87
million.


PARETEUM CORP: Underwriter Buys 1.4M Additional Shares
------------------------------------------------------
Pareteum Corporation announced that Dawson James Securities Inc.,
the underwriter of its November 2017 underwritten public offering,
has exercised its option to purchase an additional 1,431,421 shares
of common stock for additional net proceeds of $1,204,970. The
issuance of the additional shares closed on Thursday, Dec. 1,
2017.

                         About Pareteum

New York-based Pareteum Corporation (NYSEMKT: TEUM), formerly known
as Elephant Talk Communications, Inc. -- http://www.pareteum.com--
is an international provider of business software and services to
the telecommunications and financial services industry.

Squar Milner, LLP, in Los Angeles, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification in its report on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has an
accumulated deficit of $287,080,234 and has negative working
capital.  This, according to the auditors, raises substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Pareteum incurred a net loss of $31.44 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, following a net loss of $5 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.  The Company's balance sheet as of Sept. 30,
2017, showed $10.28 million in total assets, $15.16 million in
total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $4.87
million.


PFO GLOBAL: Case Converted into Liquidation Proceeding
------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court issued
an order converting PFO Global's Chapter 11 reorganization to a
liquidation under Chapter 7. The order states, "As the Chapter 11
Trustee is no longer attempting to pursue confirmation of a plan
based upon a merger and/or sale of the Debtor's corporate shell and
the Court having already determined that conversion to chapter 7 is
appropriate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 1112(b). It Is Therefore
Ordered that the above-referenced jointly administered bankruptcy
cases are hereby CONVERTED."

                       About PFO Global

PFO Global, Inc., and its affiliates are a consolidated group of
companies that operate in the eyewear and lenses industry
worldwide.  Global owns 100% of the equity interests in Pro Fit
Optix Holding Company, LLC.  In turn, Holding owns 100% of the
equity interests in Pro Fit Optix, Inc., PFO Technologies, LLC, PFO
Optima, LLC, and PFO MCO, LLC.

PFO Global, Pro Fit Optix Holding Company, Pro Fit Optix, PFO
Technologies, PFO Optima, and PFO MCO, filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-30355) in Dallas on Jan. 31,
2017.

Rosa R. Orenstein, Esq., and Nathan M. Nichols, Esq., at Orenstein
Law Group, P.C., serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Haynes
and Boone, LLP, is their special corporate and securities law
counsel.  Mahesh Shetty, a certified public accountant, is the
Debtor's financial officer. RBSM, LLP and Litzler, Segner, Shaw &
McKenney LLP serve as accountants.

In February 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired
Shraiberg, Ferrara, Landau & Page, P.A. as legal counsel, and
McCathern, PLLC as local counsel.

On June 21, 2017, Shawn K. Brown was appointed Chapter 11 trustee.
The trustee hired Rochelle McCullough LLP as his bankruptcy
counsel; Litzler, Segner, Shaw & McKenney LLP as accountant; and
Rosen Systems as auctioneer.


PLASCO TOOLING: Files Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation
----------------------------------------------------
Plasco Tooling & Engineering Corporation files with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan a Combined
Plan of Liquidation and Disclosure Statement dated November16,
2017.

The Plan divides claims and interests into six classes and treats
them as follows:

     Class I: consists of First State Bank’s Secured Claims, in
the aggregate amount of $2,899,271. After the Petition Date, the
First State Bank has been paid $2,270,306.39 from liquidation of
its collateral, leaving a balance of $628,964.13 plus applicable
pre-Petition Date fees and accrued interest. Under the Plan,
Reorganized Debtor is authorized to negotiate an appropriate amount
for such fees and accrued interest and, in the absence of an
agreement, either Reorganized Debtor or First State Bank may
request that a determination be made by the Court. To the extent
that the remaining proceeds of the First State Bank’s collateral
is insufficient to pay its secured claims, the remaining unpaid
amount of the its claims will be general unsecured claims. This
Class is impaired.

     Class II: consists of the Allowed Secured Claim of the U.S.
Small Business Association in the amount of $339,408.24 secured by
the SBA Account. To the extent that the SBA is determined to have a
first priority security interest in the SBA Account, the SBA will
be paid that amount from the SBA Account. To the extent that the
SBA is determined to not have a first priority security interest in
the SBA Account, the SBA’s Claim will be a general unsecured
claim. This Class is impaired.

     Class III: consists of the Allowed Secured Claim of Direct
Capital Corporation in the amount of $57,839.97 secured by the DCC
Account. To the extent that Direct Capital Corporation is
determined to have a first priority security interest in the DCC
Account, Direct Capital Corporation will be paid that amount from
the DCC Account. However, to the extent that Direct Capital
Corporation is determined to not have a first priority security
interest in the DCC Account, Direct Capital Corporation’s Claim
will be a general unsecured claim. This Class is impaired.

     Class IV: consists of the Secured Claims of the Macomb County
Treasurer, in the amount of $6,303.63 for personal property taxes.
The Debtor will pay the Macomb County Treasurer its Allowed Secured
Claim, in full and final satisfaction of all Claims asserted by the
Macomb County Treasurer, within 60 days after the Effective Date.

     Class V: consists of holders of allowed general unsecured
claims, which will be paid a pro rata share of the General
Unsecured Claims Payment. The amount of the General Unsecured
Claims Payment will be the proceeds of all the Debtor’s assets,
including all Causes of Action, after payment of all Secured,
Administrative, and Priority Claims. Debtor makes no guaranty or
representation that there will be sufficient funds to make a
General Unsecured Claims Payment. This Class is impaired.

     Class VI: consists of the Claims of Interests. The Interests
of this Class will be canceled and the Interests of the Reorganized
Debtor will be reissued to the Liquidating Plan Committee to be
held for the benefit of all Beneficiaries of this Plan.

Funding for the administration of the bankruptcy estate and of the
Plan and for the actions necessary for the legal wind down of the
Debtor will come from funds on hand and the proceeds of the
liquidation of Debtor’s remaining assets.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:
https://tinyurl.com/ydeps8c3

The Plan was prepared by the Debtor’s Counsel:

            Ryan D. Heilman, Esq.
            Michael R. Wernette, Esq.
            WERNETTE HEILMAN PLLC
            24725 W. 12 Mile Rd., Suite 110
            Southfield, MI 48034
            Telephone: (248) 663-5146
            Email: ryan@wernetteheilman.com

        About Plasco Tooling & Engineering Corporation

Headquartered in Romeo, Michigan, Plasco Tooling & Engineering
Corporation -- http://www.plascocorp.com/about-plasco/-- is
globally recognized as a supplier of aircraft and automotive
tooling parts. The Company offers integrated program management,
design, CNC machining, and the manufacture of Invar tools, assembly
jigs, checking fixtures, gages, dies, and more while adhering to
its customers' stringent quality requirements.

Plasco Tooling filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
E.D. Mich. Case No. 17-49638) on June 29, 2017, estimating its
assets and liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million. The
petition was signed by John Zuccarini, president.

Judge Mark A. Randon presides over the case.

Ryan D. Heilman, Esq., at Wernette Heilman PLLC, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel. Angle Advisors LLC is the Debtor's
investment banker.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 9 on July 14, 2017, appointed six
creditors to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors
in the Chapter 11 case of Plasco Tooling & Engineering Corp. The
committee members are: (1) Carl Spaeth; (2) Michael Oakley; (3)
Randal D. Bellestri; (4) Robert A. Goolsby; (5) Michael MaGuire;
and (6) Judith Apel. The Committee hired Varnum LLP, as counsel,
Delta Management Resources, LLC, as financial advisor.


PLAZA BROADWAY: Vaquero's Bid for Ch. 11 Trustee Appointment Junked
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Harlin D. Hale of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas issued an order denying Vaquero Broadway
Partners, LP's emergency motion for appointment of a chapter 11
trustee in the case of Plaza Broadway Retail Group, LLC.

The Court finds that Vaquero has not provided clear and convincing
evidence that cause exists for the appointment of a chapter 11
trustee.

The record indicates that the debtor has not complied with the
transparency requirements of the bankruptcy code and such failure,
if not remedied, could result in the appointment of a trustee. The
debtor's principal is responsible for filing accurate schedules and
statement of financial affairs. In this district, the debtor's
principal's meet with the US Trustee’s office right after the
case is filed and they are given a set of requirements, which they
sign. Those are his responsibilities, the debtor's
responsibilities, which cannot be passed off to others.

A full-text copy of Judge Hale's Order dated Nov. 6, 2017, is
available at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/txnb17-30266-11-92.pdf

              Plaza Broadway Retail Group, LLC

Plaza Broadway Retail Group, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No. 17-30247) on January 22, 2017.
Eric A. Liepins, PC served as bankruptcy counsel but was later
replaced by Quilling, Selander, Lownds, Winslett & Moser, PC.  The
Debtor's assets and liabilities are both below $1 million.


PREMIER EXHIBITIONS: Seeks Approval of Assets Sale Procedures
-------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Premier Exhibitions filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court a motion approving procedures in connection
with the sale of all of substantially all of the Debtors' assets,
scheduling a related auction and approving bid protections. The
motion explains, "Bids must be accompanied by a good faith deposit
in readily available funds in the form of cash, a wire transfer (to
a bank account specified by the Debtors) or certified check payable
to Premier Exhibitions in an amount equal to 10% of the Purchase
Price. Despite interest from numerous potential buyers, no stalking
horse bidder was designated on the timeline contemplated in the
Plan Support Agreement. The Debtors and the Supporting Committees,
however, believe a sale and auction process may produce bids for
the Assets that will provide consideration at levels that the
Debtors and Supporting Committees will support. The Debtors request
that the Court approve sales procedures that will enable potential
buyers to submit bids for the Assets or certain Auction Lots and
participate in an Auction on February 6, 2018. If the sale process
results in a bid for all of the Debtors' Assets at or above a
minimum threshold price agreed to among the Debtors and the
Supporting Committees (the 'Reserve Price'), the Supporting
Committees have agreed to support the approval of sale of the
Assets through either the confirmation of a chapter 11 plan or by
motion and hearing pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.
The Debtor requests entry of the Sale Procedures Order . . .
authorizing, but not directing, the Debtor, to select one or more
Stalking Horse Bidders and to provide, if needed, the Bid
Protections to any Stalking Horse Bidder, including (i) a break-up
fee of up to 3% of the Purchase Price set forth in the Stalking
Horse Bid, and (ii) reimbursement for the reasonable fees and
expenses of the Stalking Horse Bidder up to 1% of the Purchase
Price." The following dates are fixed: bid deadline: January 30,
2018 and auction: February 6, 2018.

                 About About RMS Titanic, Inc.

Premier Exhibitions, Inc. (Nasdaq: PRXI), located in Atlanta,
Georgia, is a presenter of museum quality exhibitions throughout
the world.  Premier -- http://www.PremierExhibitions.com/--
develops and displays unique exhibitions for education and
entertainment including Titanic: The Artifact Exhibition, BODIES.
The Exhibition, Tutankhamun: The Golden King and the Great
Pharaohs, Pompeii The Exhibition, Extreme Dinosaurs and Real
Pirates in partnership with National Geographic. The success of
Premier Exhibitions lies in its ability to produce, manage, and
market exhibitions.

RMS Titanic and seven of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions
for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Lead Case No. 16-02230) on June 14, 2016.  Former Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer Michael J. Little
signed the petitions.  The Chapter 11 cases are assigned to Judge
Paul M. Glenn.

The Debtors estimated both assets and liabilities of $10 million to
$50 million.

The Debtors are represented by Daniel F. Blanks, Esq., and Lee D.
Wedekind, III, Esq., at Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP.
The Debtors employ Brian A. Wainger, Esq., at Kaleo Legal as
special litigation counsel, outside general counsel, securities
counsel, and conflicts counsel; Robert W. McFarland, Esq., at
McGuireWoods LLP as special litigation counsel; Steven L. Berson,
Esq., at Dentons US LLP and Dentons Canada LLP as outside general
counsel and securities counsel; Oscar N. Pinkas, Esq., at Dentons
LLP as outside general counsel and securities counsel.

The Debtors also employed Ronald L. Glass as Chief Restructuring
Officer and GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC, as financial
advisors.

Guy Gebhardt, acting U.S. trustee for Region 21, on Aug. 24, 2016
appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors of RMS Titanic, Inc., and its affiliates.  The
Committee hired Avery Samet, Esq. and Jeffrey Chubak, Esq., at
Storch Amini & Munves PC, and Richard R. Thames, Esq. and Robert A.
Heekin, Jr., Esq., at Thames Markey & Heekin, P.A., as counsel.

The official committee of equity security holders of Premier
Exhibitions Inc. retained Peter J. Gurfein, Esq., at Landau
Gottfried & Berger LLP as counsel; Jacob A. Brown, Esq., and
Katherine C. Fackler, Esq., at Akerman LLP as Co-Counsel; and Teneo
Securities LLC as financial advisor.


PRODUCTION PATTERN: Taps W. Donald Gieseke as CRO
-------------------------------------------------
Production Pattern and Foundry Co., Inc. seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada to hire W. Donald
Gieseke and his firm The Galena Group as consultant in the capacity
of chief restructuring officer.

The Debtor requires the appointment of a chief executive officer or
chief restructuring officer to provide financial and operational
management services for the Debtor under the direction of the
Debtor's Board of Directors.

The fee arrangement with Mr. Gieseke consist of a $10,000 monthly
fixed fee for his services.

Mr. Gieseke attests that he represents no interest adverse to the
estate in matters upon which he is to be retained.

The CRO can be reached through:

     W. Donald Gieseke
     Galena Group, Inc.                                            
        
     8600 Technology Way                                           
                           
     Reno, NV 89521   
     Tel: (775) 852-4545
     Fax: (775) 852-4002

               About Production Pattern and Foundry

Production Pattern and Foundry Co., Inc. -- http://www.ppfco.com/
-- is a TS-16949 Certified, casting foundry, producing aluminum
castings for a wide variety of industries.  PPF produces parts and
equipment components for a broad spectrum of markets -- from
chip-making equipment to drinking fountains.  Typical PPF customer
applications have included: housings mounting bases, manifolds,
valve bodies, door hinges and brackets.  The company also has
experience in heavy truck manufacturing, semiconductor chip
manufacturing equipment, medical and dental equipment
manufacturing, construction, utility, packaging machinery and
sports equipment industries.

Production Pattern filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case
No. 17-51106) on Sept. 20, 2017.  The petition was signed by Arlene
Cochran, president.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated
assets and liabilities of $10 million to $50 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Bruce T. Beesley.  The Debtor hired
Minden Lawyers, LLC as its bankruptcy counsel and Harris Law
Practice LLC as co-counsel.


PROVEN PEST: New Plan Discloses $2K Claim by GA Revenue Dept.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Proven Pest Solutions, Inc., filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Northern District of Georgia an amended disclosure
statement referring to the Debtor's plan of reorganization Proposed
Plan of Reorganization filed by Debtor on October 9, 2017.

The amended disclosure statement discloses that the Georgia
Department of Revenue has filed a proof of claim alleging that
$1,905.24 of the amount owed to it was a priority tax claim
pursuant to Section 507(a)(8).

Class 3 General Unsecured Claims are impaired by the Plan.  All
general unsecured claimants that file proofs of claims by the
deadline that are allowed will receive 50% of the amount due on the
proof of claim in 24 equal payments made monthly for a two year
period from the Effective Date.

Payments and distributions under the Plan will be funded by the
Debtor's income from its operations.

A copy of the Disclosure Statement is available at:
https://tinyurl.com/ybwygn4g

                About Proven Pest Solutions Inc.

Proven Pest Solutions, Inc., sought protection under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-54503) on March 8,
2017.  The petition was signed by Brandon Caldwell, president.

The case was initially assigned to Judge Paul W. Bonapfel.  On
March 13, 2017, Judge Bonapfel ordered the transfer of the case to
Judge W. Homer Drake in the Newnan Division.  The case was assigned
a new case number: 17-10564.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.

Beth E. Rogers, Esq., and James F. Carroll, Esq., who have an
office in Atlanta, Georgia, serve as the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Proven Pest Solutions, Inc., as
of May 2, according to a court docket.


REAL INDUSTRY: Files DIP Loan-Related Agreements to Court
---------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Real Industry filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a D.I.P. notes purchase agreement and D.I.P. ABL
agreement. According to documents filed with the Court, "Subject to
the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Financing Order
and in reliance upon the representations and warranties of the
Credit Parties contained herein, each Lender severally and not
jointly agrees to make Loans to the Borrowers (collectively, the
'Revolving Loans' and individually, a 'Revolving Loan') from time
to time on any Business Day during the period from the Closing Date
through the Final Availability Date, in an aggregate amount not to
exceed at any time outstanding such Lender's Revolving Loan
Commitment, which Revolving Loan Commitment, as of the Closing
Date, is set forth opposite such Lender's name on Schedule 1.1(a)
under the heading 'Revolving Loan Commitments'. Borrower
Representative may request that one or more L/C Issuers Issue, in
accordance with such L/C Issuers' usual and customary business
practices and for the account of the Borrowers, Letters of Credit
and an applicable L/C Issuer (a 'Letter of Credit'), from time to
time on any Business Day during the period from the Closing Date
through the earlier of (x) the Final Availability Date and (y) 7
days prior to the Revolving Termination Date; provided, however,
that no L/C Issuer shall Issue any Letter of Credit upon the
occurrence of any of the following or, if after giving effect to
such Issuance: the aggregate outstanding principal balance of
Revolving Loans would exceed the Maximum Revolving Loan Amount or
(b) the Letter of Credit Obligations for all Letters of Credit
would exceed $20,000,000."

                      About Real Industry

Real Industry, Inc. -- http://www.realindustryinc.com/-- is a
Delaware holding company that operates through its subsidiaries.
Its current business focus is supporting the performance of Real
Alloy, an aluminum recycling company and its single largest
operating business, and to make acquisitions of additional
operating companies.  The company regularly considers acquisitions
of businesses that operate in undervalued industries, as well as
businesses that it believes are in transition or are otherwise
misunderstood by the marketplace.  As a holding company, Real
Industry relies on the operations of its subsidiaries and external
financing sources for its liquidity needs.  During the past year,
the holding company's liquidity and financial position declined to
levels where the Board of Directors of the Company concluded that
it was in the best interests of the Company to reorganize under a
Chapter 11 filing.

Real Industry, Inc. and eight affiliated debtors each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12464) on Nov. 17,
2017.  The cases are pending before the Honorable Kevin J. Carey.

The Debtors tapped Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, as local
bankruptcy counsel; Morrison & Foerster LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisor;
Jefferies LLC, as investment banker; and Prime Clerk, as claims and
noticing agent.


REAL INDUSTRY: Seeks to Hire Saul Ewing as Co-Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Real Industry, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to hire Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr
LLP.

Saul Ewing will serve as co-counsel with Morrison & Foerster LLP,
the firm tapped by the company and its affiliates to be their
bankruptcy counsel.

The firm's hourly rates range from $395 to $950 for partners, $325
to $660 for special counsel, $250 to $430 for associates, and $80
to $340 for paraprofessionals.

The attorneys primarily responsible for representing the Debtors
and their hourly rates are:

     Mark Minuti                 Partner       $710
     Sharon Levine               Partner       $780
     Monique Bair DiSabatino     Associate     $395

The firm received a retainer from the Debtors in the sum of
$100,000.

Mark Minuti, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr.
Minuti disclosed that his firm has not agreed to any variations
from, or alternatives to, its standard or customary billing
arrangements; and that no Saul Ewing professional has varied his
rate based on the geographic location of the bankruptcy cases.

The Debtors "approved or will be approving a prospective budget"
and staffing plan for Saul Ewing's employment for the post-petition
period, according to Mr. Minuti.

Saul Ewing can be reached through:

     Mark Minuti, Esq.
     Monique B. DiSabatino, Esq.
     Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP
     1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2300
     P.O. Box 1266
     Wilmington, DE 19801
     Tel: (302) 421-6840
     Fax: (302) 421-5873
     Email: mark.minuti@saul.com
     Email: monique.disabatino@saul.com

          - and -

     Sharon L. Levine, Esq.
     Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP
     1037 Raymond Boulevard, Suite 1520
     Newark, NJ 07102
     Tel: (973) 286-6718
     Fax: (973) 286-6821
     Email: sharon.levine@saul.com

                       About Real Industry

Real Industry, Inc. -- http://www.realindustryinc.com/-- is a  
Delaware holding company that operates through its subsidiaries.
Its current business focus is supporting the performance of Real
Alloy, an aluminum recycling company and its single largest
operating business, and to make acquisitions of additional
operating companies.  The company regularly considers acquisitions
of businesses that operate in undervalued industries, as well as
businesses that it believes are in transition or are otherwise
misunderstood by the marketplace.  As a holding company, Real
Industry relies on the operations of its subsidiaries and external
financing sources for its liquidity needs.

Real Industry, Inc., and eight affiliated debtors each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12464) on
Nov. 17, 2017.  The cases are pending before the Honorable Kevin J.
Carey.

The Debtors tapped Jefferies LLC as investment banker, and Prime
Clerk as claims and noticing agent.


REAL INDUSTRY: Taps Morrison & Foerster as Legal Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Real Industry, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware to hire Morrison & Foerster LLP as
legal counsel.

The firm will advise the company and its affiliates regarding their
duties under the Bankruptcy Code; negotiate with creditors; give
advice regarding any potential sale of their assets; assist in the
negotiations of financing agreements; prepare a bankruptcy plan;
and provide other legal services related to their Chapter 11
cases.

The firm's hourly rates range from $675 to $1,360 for partners,
$485 to $1,300 for "of counsel" and "senior of counsel," $330 to
$830 for attorneys and associates; and $250 to $340 for
paraprofessionals.

Morrison received an advance payment of $250,000 as retainer prior
to the petition date.

Gary Lee, Esq., disclosed in a court filing that his firm is a
"disinterested person" as defined in section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for reviewing fee
applications filed by attorneys in larger Chapter 11 cases, Mr. Lee
disclosed that his firm has not agreed to any variations from, or
alternatives to, its standard or customary billing arrangements;
and that no Morrison professional has varied his rate based on the
geographic location of the bankruptcy cases.

The Debtors and Morrison expect to develop a budget and staffing
plan to comply with the U.S. trustee's requests for information and
additional disclosures, according to Mr. Lee.

Morrison & Foerster can be reached through:

     Gary S. Lee, Esq.
     Mark A. Lightner, Esq.
     Benjamin Butterfield, Esq.
     Morrison & Foerster LLP
     250 West 55th Street
     New York, NY 10019
     Tel: (212) 468-8000
     Fax: (212) 468-7900
     Email: glee@mofo.com
     Email: mlightner@mofo.com
     Email: bbutterfield@mofo.com

                       About Real Industry

Real Industry, Inc. -- http://www.realindustryinc.com/-- is a
Delaware holding company that operates through its subsidiaries.
Its current business focus is supporting the performance of Real
Alloy, an aluminum recycling company and its single largest
operating business, and to make acquisitions of additional
operating companies.  The company regularly considers acquisitions
of businesses that operate in undervalued industries, as well as
businesses that it believes are in transition or are otherwise
misunderstood by the marketplace.  As a holding company, Real
Industry relies on the operations of its subsidiaries and external
financing sources for its liquidity needs.

Real Industry, Inc., and eight affiliated debtors each filed a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12464) on
Nov. 17, 2017.  The cases are pending before the Honorable Kevin J.
Carey.

The Debtors tapped Jefferies LLC as investment banker, and Prime
Clerk as claims and noticing agent.


RICHARDSON INVESTMENTS: Whites Buying Joelton Property for $50,000
------------------------------------------------------------------
Richardson Investments LLC of Nashville asks the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Tennessee to authorize the sale of
real property located at 5522 Clarksville Pike, Joelton, Tennessee,
to Cannonball and Phyllis White for $50,000.

Richardson Investments is concerned that if the sale is not
completed quickly it will fall through; therefore, the Motion needs
to be heard on an expedited basis.  The Debtor asks that the matter
be heard on Dec. 12, 2017, at 9:00 a.m.

The Debtor owned the Property.  It transferred the Property to
Robert Richardson, an insider, for no consideration.  It was
unaware at that time that a judgment lien had been placed on the
property by W. David Bridges, Trustee.  In lieu of filing a
turnover action, Robert Richardson is willing to convey the
property back to the bankruptcy estate.  However, the Debtor feels
that it is in the best interest of creditors to sell the property
and use the proceeds to pay the lienholder.

The proposed sale is a cash purchase with the Buyers attempting to
close before the end of the year for tax purposes.  It believes it
to be fair market value for the property.

A full-text copy of the Purchase and Sale Agreement attached to the
Motion is available for free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Richardson_Investments_12_Sales.pdf

From the sale proceeds, the Debtor proposes to pay the pro rata
yearly property taxes.  It understands that W. David Bridges,
Trustee, the creditor holding a lien on the property, must approve
the sale, since the debt will not be satisfied in full.  The lien
held by W. David Bridges, Trustee will attached to the proceeds of
the sale.

         About Richardson Investments LLC of Nashville

Richardson Investments LLC, a small business debtor as defined in
11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D), is the fee simple owner of a commercial
strip center located at 5428 Clarksville Highway,  Whites Creek,
Tennessee, valued by the company at $1.1 million.  The company
reported gross revenue of $55,800 in 2016 and gross revenue of
$55,800 in 2015.

Richardson Investments LLC of Nashville sought Chapter 11
protection (M.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-07377) on Oct. 31, 2017.  Judge
Randal S. Mashburn presides over the case.

The Debtor estimated total assets at $1.21 million and total
liabilities at $920,556.

The Debtor tapped Steven L. Lefkovitz, Esq., at Lefkovitz &
Lefkovitz as counsel.

The petition was signed by Gregory Richardson, its chief manager.

The Debtor can be reached at:

          RICHARDSON INVESTMENTS LLC OF NASHVILLE
          5428 Clarksville Highway
          Whites Creek, TN 37189


ROSETTA GENOMICS: Fails to Comply with Nasdaq's Bid Price Rule
--------------------------------------------------------------
Rosetta Genomics, Ltd., received a staff deficiency letter from The
Nasdaq Stock Market on Nov. 28, 2017, notifying the Company that
for the past 30 consecutive business days, the closing bid price
per share of its ordinary shares was below the $1.00 minimum bid
price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital
Market, as required by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2).  As a
result, the Company was notified by Nasdaq that it is not in
compliance with the Bid Price Rule.  Nasdaq has provided the
Company with 180 calendar days, or until May 29, 2018, to regain
compliance with the Bid Price Rule.  This notification has no
immediate effect on the Company's listing on the Nasdaq Capital
Market or on the trading of the Company's ordinary shares.

To regain compliance with the Bid Price Rule, the closing bid price
of the Company's ordinary shares must meet or exceed $1.00 per
share for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days during the 180
day grace period.  If the Company's ordinary shares do not regain
compliance with the Bid Price Rule during this grace period, it may
be eligible for an additional grace period of 180 calendar days
provided that the Company satisfies Nasdaq's initial listing
standards for listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, other than the
minimum bid price requirement, and provides written notice to
Nasdaq of its intention to cure the delinquency during the second
grace period.  If the Company does not regain compliance during the
initial grace period and is not eligible for an additional grace
period, Nasdaq will provide written notice that the Company's
ordinary shares are subject to delisting from The Nasdaq Capital
Market.  In that event, the Company may appeal such determination
to a hearings panel.

                    About Rosetta Genomics

Based in Rehovot, Israel, Rosetta Genomics Ltd. is seeking to
develop and commercialize new diagnostic tests based on a recently
discovered group of genes known as microRNAs.  MicroRNAs are
naturally expressed, or produced, using instructions encoded in DNA
and are believed to play an important role in normal function and
in various pathologies.  The Company has established a
CLIA-certified laboratory in Philadelphia, which enables the
Company to develop, validate and commercialize its own diagnostic
tests applying its microRNA technology.  Visit www.rosettagx.com.
for more information.

Rosetta Genomics reported a net loss of US$16.23 million on US$9.23
million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss of US$17.34 million on US$8.26 million of
total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30,
2017, Rosetta had US$6.20 million in total assets, US$5.11 million
in total liabilities and US$1.09 million in total shareholders'
equity.

Kost Forer Gabby & Kasierer, a member of Ernst & Young Global, in
Tel-Aviv, Israel, issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
citing that the Company has recurring losses from operations and
has limited liquidity resources that raise substantial doubt about
its ability to continue as a going concern.


SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Dec. 23
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Paul G. Hyman, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida has extended, at the behest of Shiraz
Holdings, LLC, the exclusive right for the Debtor to file a plan of
reorganization and seek acceptances thereof for a period of 60 days
or until Dec. 23, 2017, and Feb. 18, 2017, respectively.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Oct. 27, 2017, the
Debtor requested the extension, saying that it needs additional
time to negotiate and prepare adequate information while it
continues to negotiate with its secured and unsecured creditors to
advance restructuring of its debt.  The Debtor said it is in the
process of negotiating with its creditors, it has engaged brokers
to help facilitate the sale of leases of its properties, and has
reached certain settlements that should prove helpful in its
reorganization efforts.

                  About Shiraz Holdings, LLC

Shiraz Holdings, LLC, based in Delray Beach, Florida, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-17968) on June
26, 2017. The Hon. Paul G. Hyman, Jr. presides over the case.
Thomas M. Messana, Esq., at Messana, P.A., serves as bankruptcy
counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Jordan A.
Satary, managing member.


SKY-SKAN INC: U.S. Trustee Forms 3-Member Committee
---------------------------------------------------
The Office of the U.S. Trustee on Dec. 1 appointed three creditors
to serve on the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Chapter 11 case of Sky-Skan Incorporated.

The committee members are:

     (1) Adek Technical Sales, Inc.
         3 Infinity Drive
         Raymond, NH 03077
         Attn:  Edward King, President and CEO   

     (2) Infitec GmbH
         Karlstrasse 70
         89547 Gerstetten, Germany
         Attn:  Helmut Jorke, Managing Director

     (3) Opticis USA, LLC  
         17748 Skypark Circle #260  
         Irvine, CA 92604  
         Attn:  Mickey Park, Executive Partner
  
Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense. They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs. Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                  About Sky-Skan Incorporated

Sky-Skan, Inc., was founded in 1967 as a company dedicated solely
to the development and manufacture of specialized devices for
depicting dynamic visualizations of astronomical and meteorological
phenomena on planetarium domes in museums, schools, and
universities. The company has since grown to become a provider of
digital fulldome science visualization, theater control, and show
programming systems for hundreds of planetariums on six continents,
serving hundreds of clients in the niche field of immersive science
interpretation and education. From the initial planning stage to
staff training and ongoing support, Sky-Skan provides all services
required by the most advanced digital fulldome planetariums and
visualization theaters.

Sky-Skan, based in Nashua, NH, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
D.N.H. Case No. 17-11540) on Nov. 1, 2017.  Steven T. Savage,
president, signed the petition.  In its petition, the Debtor
estimated less than $50,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million
in liabilities.  

Peter N. Tamposi, Esq., at The Tamposi Law Group, P.C., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Deshaies Law as co-counsel
with Tamposi Law Group, and SquareTail Advisors, LLC as financial
advisor.


SOUTH SHORE PAINTING: Hires McIntyre Thanasides as Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
South Shore Painting and Waterproofing LLC seeks approval from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa
Division, to employ McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold Elliott Grimaldi
& Guito, P.A. as counsel.

The professional services to be rendered by McIntyre Thanasides
are:

     a. render legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers and
duties as debtor-in-possession, the continued operation of its
business and/or the management of its property;

     b. prepare on behalf of the Debtor any necessary petitions,
motions, applications, answers, orders, reports, and other legal
papers;

     c. appear before the Court and the United States Trustee to
represent and protect the interests of the Debtor;

     d. take all necessary legal steps to confirm a plan of
reorganization;

     e. represent the Debtor in all adversary suits, contested
matters and matters involving administration of this case;

     f. represent the Debtor in any negotiations with potential
financing sources and preparing contracts, security instruments, or
other documents necessary to obtain financing;

     g. take any necessary action to recover any voidable transfers
and avoid any liens against the Debtor's property obtained within
90 days of the filing of the petition in Chapter 11 and at a time
when the Debtor was insolvent;

     h. enjoin or staying any and all suits against the Debtor
affecting the debtor-in-possession's ability to continue in
business or affecting property in which the Debtor has equity; and

     i. perform all other legal services that may be necessary for
the proper preservation and administration of this Chapter 11
case.

James W. Elliot, Esq., member of McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold
Elliott Grimaldi & Guito, P.A., attests that neither he nor any
member of the MT Firm represents or holds any interest adverse to
the Debtor, or its members, officers, directors, or attorneys or
any individual creditors of the Debtor's estate; and MT Firm is a
"disinterested person" under 11 U.S.C. Sec 101(14).

The Counsel can be reached through:

     James W. Elliot, Esq.
     McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold Elliott
        Grimaldi & Guito, P.A.
     500 E. Kennedy Blvd Suite 200
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Phone: 844-511-4800

                   About South Shore Painting

Based in Brandon, Florida, South Shore Painting and Waterproofing
LLC filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
17-09416) on November 6, 2017, listing under $1 million in assets
and liabilities.  James W. Elliot, Esq. at McIntyre Thanasides
Bringgold Elliott Grimaldi & Guito, P.A. represents the Debtor as
counsel.


STATESBORO LIFE: Case Summary & 6 Largest Unsecured Creditors
-------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Statesboro Life Restaraunt Group, Inc.
        6350 Lake Oconee Pkwy, Suite 110
        Greensboro, Ga 30642

Business Description: Based in Greensboro, Georgia,
                      Statesboro Life Restaraunt Group,
                      is a Single Asset Real Estate (as
                      defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51B))
                      debtor.  The company's principal
                      place of business is located at 6319
                      Bank Dairy Road, in Statesboro,
                      Georgia.  The company was founded
                      in 2010.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: December 1, 2017

Case No.: 17-60521

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of Georgia (Statesboro)

Judge: Hon. Edward J. Coleman III

Debtor's Counsel: Jon A. Levis, Esq.
                  MERRILL & STONE, LLC
                  P O Box 129
                  Swainsboro, GA 30401
                  Tel: 478-237-7029
                  Fax: 478-237-9211
                  Email: bkymail@merrillstonehamilton.com

Total Assets: $634,725

Total Liabilities: $1.34 million

The petition was signed by Christian Bennett, owner/stockholder.

A copy of the Debtor's list of six largest unsecured creditors is
available for free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/gasb17-60521_creditors.pdf

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/gasb17-60521.pdf


TAYLOR-WHARTON: Bid to Amend Discrimination Suit Rejected
---------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned SHEILA ZINNERMAN, Plaintiff, v.
TAYLOR-WHARTON CRYOGENICS, LLC, and WORTHINGTON INDUS. INC.,
Defendants, Civil Action No. 17-00123-KD-B (S.D. Ala.), District
Judge Kristi K. Dubose denied Plaintiff's motion to amend the
complaint and a proposed second amended complaint.

On March 17, 2017, Plaintiff Sheila Zimmerman initiated the current
race and age discrimination case against Taylor, Argus Management
Corp. and Worthington Industries, Inc. On April 14, 2017,
Worthington filed its answer. On April 18, 2017, Argus and Taylor
filed a joint motion to dismiss. On May 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a
first amended complaint and stipulated to the voluntary dismissal
of Defendant Argus. On May 4, 2017, Defendant Argus was dismissed.
On May 17, 2017, Worthington filed its answer to the first amended
complaint. Also on this date, Taylor filed a motion to dismiss the
first amended complaint. On June 8, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion
to file a second amended complaint and proposed second amended
complaint. Per Court Order on June 13, 2017, Taylor's motion to
dismiss the original complaint was found moot per Plaintiff's
filing of the first amended complaint, and Taylor's motion to
dismiss was found moot as Docs. 15, 26 had been mooted.

Plaintiff seeks to amend her complaint a second time, "as her
matter of right" under Rule 15 "with no new substantive
allegations" but to "clearly and separately allege the counts:
Counts One and Two against Worthington, and Counts Three and Four
against Taylor." Plaintiff asserts that the counts against
defendant Taylor should not be dismissed due to Taylor's
bankruptcy, and stipulates to limit her recovery against Taylor to
the insurance proceeds for any settlement, verdict or judgment in
this case, adding that "insurance proceeds, under these
circumstances, are not part of a debtor's bankruptcy estate."
Plaintiff contends that her filing of a proof of claim in the
bankruptcy court does not change said stipulation, and Defendant
Taylor "would be free to assert a set-off if there was recovery in
the bankruptcy case."

Plaintiff adds she is "willing to stipulate to limit her recovery
to only non-estate insurance proceeds then the case should proceed
as not affecting the bankruptcy estate." In the alternative,
Plaintiff argues that if the Court finds that her filing a proof of
claim in the bankruptcy court "somehow prevents an insurance
proceeds only stipulation, then the only claims against Taylor
should be dismissed without prejudice based on the bankruptcy, and
the case should proceed on the counts against Worthington."

After analyzing all the arguments, the Court finds that there is no
dispute that Plaintiff filed a Proof of Claim in the bankruptcy
case. There is also no dispute that Plaintiff's May 2016 Proof of
Claim is based on discriminatory acts alleged to have occurred
before the issuance of the Confirmation Plan order (she was no
longer employed as of March 2016 while the Plan/Order issued Sept.
20, 2016). By filing the proof of claim she submitted herself to
the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. Thus, the Bankruptcy
Court's injunction appears to apply to plaintiff's complaint in
this case. Plaintiff has given this court no basis for determining
otherwise. Accordingly, the motion to amend is denied and the
motion to dismiss Taylor-Wharton as a party is granted.

Further, Worthington opposes the amendment to the extent it is
incurring attorneys' fees and expenses to litigate Plaintiff's
re-alleging of claims against the other defendant. Despite
Worthington's position, this is part of the litigation process and
Worthington has not established that any fees/expenses are being
incurred unnecessarily. As such, it is ordered that Worthington's
request for fees and expenses is denied.

A full-text copy of Judge DuBose's Order dated Nov. 8, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/eUQlb3 from Leagle.com.

Shelia Zinnerman, Plaintiff, represented by Adam Matthew Milam,
Milam & Milam, LLC.

Worthington Industries, Inc., Defendant, represented by Michael E.
Turner -- met@cabaniss.com -- Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner, Dumas &
O'Neal & Sandy G. Robinson -- sgr@cabaniss.com -- Cabaniss,
Johnston, Gardner, Dumas & O'Neal.

                    About Taylor-Wharton

Taylor-Wharton International LLC and Taylor-Wharton Cryogenics LLC
filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy petitions (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No.
15-12075) on Oct. 7, 2015.  The petitions were signed by Thomas
Doherty as chief restructuring officer.

Cryogenics is a leading designer, engineer and manufacturer of
cryogenic equipment designed to transport and store liquefied
atmospheric and hydrocarbon gases.  Cryogenics has a single United
States operation in Theodore, Alabama.  Cryogenics is the direct or
indirect parent of several foreign non-debtor subsidiaries which
have manufacturing operations in China, Malaysia, Slovakia, and
warehousing operations in Germany and Australia.

The Debtors have engaged Reed Smith LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel, Nixon Peabody LLP as special counsel, Argus Management
Corporation as interim management services provider, Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and Miller Buckfire & Company LLC,
as investment banker and Logan & Company, Inc., as noticing and
claims agent.  Argus Management Corporation is authorized to
provide interim management services, and designate Thomas Doherty
as chief restructuring officer.

Taylor-Wharton International LLC disclosed total assets of
$14,463,438 and total liabilities of $47,978,923.  O'Neal Steel
Inc. is listed as the largest unsecured creditor holding a trade
claim of $788,815.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon is assigned to the case.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed the Committee pursuant to
Section 1102(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Committee is
comprised of three members: (a) Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, (b) O'Neal Steel, Inc., and (c) Harsco Corporation. On
the same day, the Committee selected Lowenstein Sandler LLP and The
Rosner Law Group LLC to serve as its co-counsel and EisnerAmper LLP
to serve as its financial advisor in the Chapter 11 cases.


TDR TRUST: January 10 Plan Confirmation Hearing
-----------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida has
conditionally approved the disclosure statement filed by TDR Trust,
LLC.

The Court will conduct a hearing on confirmation of the Plan,
including timely filed objections to confirmation, objections to
the Disclosure Statement, motions for cramdown, applications for
compensation, and motions for allowance of administrative claims on
January 10, 2018 at 9:30 a.m.

Any written objections to the Disclosure Statement will be filed
and served no later than seven days prior to the date of the
confirmation hearing.

Parties in interest will submit to the Clerk's office their written
ballot accepting or rejecting the Plan no later than eight days
before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

Objections to confirmation will be filed and served no later than
seven days before the date of the Confirmation Hearing.

                   About TDR Trust, LLC

TDR Trust, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 17-07470) on Aug. 24, 2017, disclosing under $500,000
million in both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by
Mark Heidt, manager. The Debtor is represented by David W. Steen,
Esq., at David W. Steen, P.A.


TERRAVIA HOLDINGS: January 8 Plan Confirmation Hearing
------------------------------------------------------
Terravia Holdings, Inc. and affiliates filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware a combined disclosure
statement and chapter 11 plan of liquidation dated November 16,
2017, which contemplates the liquidation and dissolution of the
Debtors and the resolution of all outstanding Claims and Interests.


On November 16, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Interim
Order conditionally approving the Combined Disclosure Statement and
Plan. The Confirmation Hearing has been scheduled for January 8,
2018 at 1:00 p.m. to consider (a) final approval of the Combined
Disclosure Statement and Plan and (b) confirmation of the Combined
Disclosure Statement and Plan. The Court has fixed December 29,
2017 as the voting deadline.

Any objection to final approval of the Combined Disclosure
Statement and Plan must be filed and served by no later than
December 29, 2017 (prevailing Eastern Time).

Under the Plan, each holder of an allowed Convenience Claim under
Class will receive payment in cash equal to such allowed
convenience claim. However, if the aggregate of all Convenience
Claims exceeds $500,000, the amount in the Convenience Claim Pool,
each Class 4 Creditor will receive its Ratable Share of the
Convenience Claim Pool.

Class 4 initially will consist of all General Unsecured Claims that
are not Notes Claims that total $20,000 or less. Payment to Class 4
is in lieu of any treatment as a Class 5 Creditor. Any unsecured
creditor with a General Unsecured Claim that is not a Notes Claim
above $20,000 electing treatment as a Convenience Claim must
affirmatively do so on its Class 5 Ballot. Any funds from the
Convenience Claim Pool remaining after satisfaction of all Allowed
Convenience Claims will be available for distribution to holders of
Allowed General Unsecured Claims.

Each holder of an Allowed General Unsecured Claim under Class 5
will receive its Ratable Share of the remaining Sale Proceeds and
other assets of the Estates following:

     (a) payment in full in Cash or such other treatment as to
render Unimpaired all DIP Facility Claims, Administrative Expense
Claims, Professional Fee Claims, Other Secured Claims, Other
Priority Claims and SVB Facility Claims; and

     (b) funding of the Convenience Claim Pool under the Combined
Disclosure Statement and Plan.

Further, any Creditor electing treatment as a Class 4 Convenience
Claim will not be eligible to receive any treatment or distribution
as a Class 5 Creditor. Estimated allowed Class 5 claims is
$181,253,700, and the projected recovery for this class is 12.25%.

Immediately following the occurrence of the Effective Date, (a) the
respective boards of directors and managers of each of the Debtors
will be terminated and the members of each of the boards of
directors and managers of the Debtors will be deemed to have
resigned and (b) each of the Debtors will continue to exist as
Liquidating Debtors after the Effective Date in accordance with the
respective laws of the state under which each such Debtor was
formed and pursuant to their respective certificates of
incorporation, bylaws, articles of formation, operating agreements
and other organizational documents in effect prior to the Effective
Date, except to the extent such organizational documents are
amended under the Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan, for the
limited purposes of liquidating all of the assets of the Estates
and making distributions in accordance with the Combined Disclosure
Statement and Plan.

On the Effective Date, TerraVia will issue one share of stock in
Liquidating TerraVia to the Plan Administrator, which will hold
such share of stock, and such share of stock will remain
outstanding until Liquidating TerraVia is dissolved in accordance
with the Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan.

A full-text copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement is
available at:

              https://tinyurl.com/y8dry5uj

                   About TerraVia

Headquartered in South San Francisco, California, TerraVia
Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:TVIA) -- http://www.terravia.com/-- is a
plant-based food, nutrition and specialty ingredients company that
harnesses the power of algae, the mother of all plants and earth's
original superfood.  TerraVia also manufactures a range of
specialty personal care ingredients for key strategic partners.

On Aug. 2, 2017, TerraVia Holdings, Inc., and its wholly-owned U.S.
subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions under chapter 11 of title 11
of the United States Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11655).
The subsidiary debtors in the Chapter 11 cases are Solazyme Brazil
LLC and Solazyme Manufacturing 1, LLC.

The Debtors sought bankruptcy protection after reaching a deal to
sell the assets to Corbion N.V. for $20 million in cash plus the
assumption of liabilities.

The Debtors hired Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP as their lead counsel
and Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., as co-counsel.  Kurtzman
Carson Consultants LLC is the Debtors' claims agent.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the Chapter 11 case.


TOYS R US: Seeks Court Approval of Sr. Executive Incentive Plan
---------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Toys "R" Us filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court a motion for entry of an order approving the
Debtors' senior executive incentive plan (SEIP). The motion
explains, "the Debtors developed the SEIP for 17 senior members of
the management team as part of an overall compensation package that
is both consistent with the Debtors' historical compensation
programs and offers payments similar to its peers. The total amount
available for payment under the SEIP on an annual basis is $16
million at the Target Threshold. That amount could double if
management attained its 'stretch' goal -- a result the Debtors will
find very difficult to achieve. The SEIP Participants are at the
forefront of the Debtors' most important endeavours: executing on
daily performance and leading Toys "R" US through its
restructuring. The importance of having these individuals fully
incentivized cannot be overstated." The Court scheduled a December
5, 2017 hearing on the motion.

                       About Toys "R" Us

Toys "R" Us, Inc., is an American toy and juvenile-products
retailer founded in 1948 and headquartered in Wayne, New Jersey, in
the New York City metropolitan area.  Merchandise is sold in 880
Toys "R" Us and Babies "R" Us stores in the United States, Puerto
Rico and Guam, and in more than 780 international stores and more
than 245 licensed stores in 37 countries and jurisdictions.

Merchandise is also sold at e-commerce sites including Toysrus.com
and Babiesrus.com.

On July 21, 2005, a consortium of Bain Capital Partners LLC,
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Vornado Realty Trust invested $1.3
billion to complete a $6.6 billion leveraged buyout of the
company.

Toys "R" Us is now a privately owned entity but still files with
the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by its debt
agreements.

The Company's consolidated balance sheet showed $6.572 billion in
assets, $7.891 billion in liabilities, and a stockholders' deficit
of $1.319 billion as of April 29, 2017.

Toys "R" Us, Inc., and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries and its
Canadian subsidiary voluntarily filed for relief under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Va. Lead Case No. Case No.
17-34665) on Sept. 19, 2017.

In addition, the Company's Canadian subsidiary voluntarily
commenced parallel proceedings under the Companies' Creditors
Arrangement Act ("CCAA") in Canada in the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice.

The Company's operations outside of the U.S. and Canada, including
its 255 licensed stores and joint venture partnership in Asia,
which are separate entities, are not part of the Chapter 11 filing
and CCAA proceedings.

Grant Thornton is the monitor appointed in the CCAA case.

Judge Keith L. Phillips presides over the Chapter 11 cases.

In the Chapter 11 cases, Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis
International LLP serve as the Debtors' legal counsel.  Kutak Rock
LLP serves as co-counsel.  Toys "R" Us employed Alvarez & Marsal
North America, LLC as its restructuring advisor; and Lazard Freres
& Co. LLC as its investment banker.  It hired Prime Clerk LLC as
claims and noticing agent.  A&G Realty Partners, LLC, serves as its
real estate advisor.

On Sept. 26, 2017, the U.S. Trustee for Region 4 appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.


UNITY COURIER: Needs More Time to Solicit Acceptances of Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------
Unity Courier Service, Inc., asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to extend the exclusive period to
obtain acceptances of its plan of reorganization for an additional
120 days, to and including April 26, 2018.

A hearing to consider the Debtor's request is scheduled for Dec.
19, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.

The Debtor submits that cause exists to extend its exclusive
periods to file a Plan and obtain acceptances thereof because,
among other reasons, (1) the Debtor timely filed its Plan and
Disclosure Statement prior to the expiration of the filing
deadline, (2) the Debtor believes the Disclosure Statement may
require amendment, and therefore, the Debtor may need additional
time to amend the Disclosure Statement and Plan, and timely comply
with all applicable rules pertaining to the confirmation of the
Plan.  By motion filed on Oct. 13, 2017, and entry of an order on
Nov. 8, 2017, the Debtor has assumed its non-residential real
property leases.  The Debtor is current on all material reporting
requirements under the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules and
Guidelines of the Office of the U.S. Trustee.  The Debtor believes
that no interested party will be prejudiced by the relief
requested.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 4, 2017, the
Court entered an order extending the exclusive periods for the
Debtor to file a plan to Oct. 27, 2017, and to solicit acceptances
of its plan to Dec. 27, 2017.

The Debtor filed its Disclosure Statement dated Oct. 11, 2017, in
support of the Debtor's Plan of Reorganization dated Oct. 11,
2017.

The Debtor believes that it may have a need for amendment of both
the Plan and Disclosure Statement.  Given the relatively short
amount of time provided by the Bankruptcy Code to solicit
acceptances of a plan and preserve exclusivity (only sixty days
from the expiration of the plan filing deadline), and the upcoming
year-end holidays, the Debtor believes that it may need additional
time to comply with solicitation and plan confirmation requirements
and preserving its exclusivity periods.

                    About Unity Courier Service

Unity Courier Service, Inc., is a courier services provider.  It
delivers individually addressed letters, parcels, and packages to
customers in the United States.

Unity Courier Service sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-13943) on March 31, 2017, estimating assets and
liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10 million.  The
petition was signed by Larry Lum, president.

Judge Ernest M. Robles is assigned to the case.

The Debtor employed Ira Benjamin Katz, a professional corporation,
and the Law Offices of David W. Meadows as general bankruptcy
counsel.


UNIVE INC: Plan Confirmation Hearing Set for Dec. 19
----------------------------------------------------
Judge Roger L. Efremsky of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of California approved the disclosure statement
aspect of Unive, Inc.'s combined plan and disclosures dated Oct.
29, 2017.

The Court has approved shortening time allowing the Plan
confirmation hearing to be conducted on Dec. 19, 2017, at 1:30 PM,
Courtroom 201, Oakland, California.

Objections to the plan confirmation must be filed and served by
Dec. 8, 2017.

Ballots must be received by Debtors' counsel by Dec. 8, 2017.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that general
unsecured creditors will recover 10% of their allowed claims in one
payment on the Effective Date.  

A copy of the Combined Plan and Disclosure Statement is available
at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/canb16-43098-67.pdf

                       About Unive, Inc.

UNIVE Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. N.D.
Cal. Case No. 16-43098) on Nov. 4, 2016, disclosing under $1
million in both assets and liabilities.  The Debtor is represented
by Mufthiha Sabaratnam, Esq.


VIRGINIA HIGH TECH: Wants to Keep Plan Exclusivity Until Feb. 4
---------------------------------------------------------------
West Virginia High Technology Consortium Foundation and HT
Foundation Holdings, Inc. -- with the consent of Huntington
National Bank -- request the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia to extend the exclusivity period to file
a Plan of Reorganization to February 4, 2018, and the exclusive
period to solicit acceptances to such plan to April 4, 2018.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtors spent much of the first few
months attempting to stabilize their operations and negotiating in
good faith with Huntington regarding potential restructuring
options. Once the negotiations with Huntington broke down in late
September, the Debtors immediately considered their reorganization
options and formulated a Plan of Reorganization.

On December 2, 2016, the Debtors filed a Plan of Reorganization and
Disclosure Statement. However, on January 12, 2017, Huntington
filed an objection to the Disclosure Statement.

After Huntington filed an Objection to the original Disclosure
Statement, the Debtors filed a First Amended Joint Disclosure
Statement and First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization on
February 3, 2017. The First Amended Plan and Disclosure Statement
were filed in an attempt to address the objections raised by
Huntington in its objection to the original Disclosure Statement.
Again, Huntington filed an objection to the First Amended Joint
Disclosure Statement.

Since that date, the Debtors and Huntington have resolved the
Debtors' Motion to Surcharge Huntington's Collateral and the
Debtors' Complaint to Determine the Secured Status of Huntington.
The resolutions of both matters were essential to the Debtors'
ability to formulate a revised plan of reorganization and
corresponding disclosure statement.

The Debtors have also negotiated a sale of the Training Center,
which sale was approved by the Court on July 25, 2017. The sale
closed on August 31, 2017.

The Debtors also filed their Second Amended and Plan and Second
Amended Disclosure on August 1, 2017, which intended to address
various issues raised by Huntington and the Court.  While the
confirmation hearing on the Second Amended Plan was originally
scheduled for December 11, the Court -- at the request of the
Debtors and Huntington -- rescheduled the confirmation hearing for
February 22, 2018.

The Debtors have continued to work toward a plan of reorganization
acceptable to all creditors, in good faith and in the best interest
of creditors.  Pending confirmation, the Debtors request an
extension of the exclusivity period to continue to work with
creditors toward an amicable resolution of any claims and toward
confirmation of the Second Amended Plan of Reorganization.

                     About West Virginia High Tech

West Virginia High Technology Consortium Foundation and HT
Foundation Holdings, Inc. filed chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D.
W.Va. Lead Case No. 16-00806) on Aug. 4, 2016.  The petitions were
signed by James L. Estep, president and CEO.

In their petitions, the Debtors estimated $10 million to $50
million in both assets and liabilities.

Judge Patrick M. Flatley presides over the cases.  David B.
Salzman, Esq., at Campbell & Levine, LLC serves as bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtors employed Rolston & Company as real estate
appraiser; Easter Valley, LLC as real estate broker; and Arnett
Carbis Toothman, LLP as accountants.

On December 2, 2016, the Debtors filed their Chapter 11 plan of
reorganization and disclosure statement.


WARWICK YARD: DOJ Watchdog Directed to Appoint Ch. 11 Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Cecelia G. Morris of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York issued an order directing the U.S.
Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the case of Debtor The
Warwick Yard, LLC.

Upon the cross-motion of secured creditor Warwick Valley DLA,
L.L.C. for the entry of an order appointing a chapter 11 Trustee,
the Court finds that there is cause to grant the relief sought and
appointing a chapter 11 trustee is in the best interests of
creditors and the estate.

During the period before the Court enters an Order approving the
person that the U.S. Trustee appoints as trustee, the current
management of the Debtor will operate the Debtor's business.

The Troubled Company Reporter previously reported that DLA sought
the appointment of a chapter 11 trustee because the Debtor lacks
control over its own books and records. Testimony of the Debtor's
representative at the 341 Meeting also makes clear that the Debtor
is mismanaged.

                   About The Warwick Yard

The Warwick Yard is a New York limited liability company that
operates a sports complex, which has open fields and covered dome
field for rent to sports teams, and charges on a per use basis.
Warwick Yard's only asset is the real property located at 120 State
School Road, Warwick, New York 10990, which has been valued at
approximately $5 million.

The Warwick Yard filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case
No. 17-36103) on June 28, 2017. The petition was signed by Mark
Goldstein, its member and manager.

The case is assigned to Judge Cecelia G. Morris.  Brian K. Condon,
Esq. at Condon & Associates, PLLC represents the Debtor.

The Debtor estimates $1 million to $10 million in assets and
liabilities.

No official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed.


WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL: Will Hold Its Annual Meeting on April 27
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Weatherford International plc will hold its 2018 annual meeting of
shareholders on April 27, 2018.  Because the date of the 2018
Annual Meeting is more than 30 days from the anniversary date of
Weatherford's 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, Weatherford is
providing the deadline for the submission of any qualified
shareholder proposal or qualified shareholder nominations under the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In accordance with Weatherford's Articles of Association, any
shareholder proposal or nomination intended to be considered for
inclusion in Weatherford's proxy materials for the 2018 Annual
Meeting, including any notice on Schedule 14N, must be received by
Weatherford at its principal executive offices at Weststrasse 1,
6340 Baar, Switzerland by no later than Dec. 11, 2017, and directed
to the Corporate Secretary.  Shareholder proposals intended to be
considered for inclusion in Weatherford's proxy materials for the
2018 Annual Meeting must comply with the requirements,
Weatherford's Articles of Association and all applicable rules and
regulations promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.

Shareholders who intend to submit a proposal regarding a director
nomination or other matter of business at the 2018 Annual Meeting,
and who do not desire to have those proposals included in
Weatherford's proxy materials for the 2018 Annual Meeting, must
ensure that notice of any such proposal (including certain
additional information specified in Weatherford's Articles of
Association) is received by the Corporate Secretary at
Weatherford's principal executive offices on or before the close of
business on Dec. 11, 2017.

                        About Weatherford

Weatherford International plc, an Irish public limited company and
Swiss tax resident -- http://www.weatherford.com/-- is a
multinational oilfield service company.  Weatherford provides
equipment and services used in the drilling, evaluation,
completion, production and intervention of oil and natural gas
wells.  The Company operates in over 90 countries and has a network
of approximately 860 locations, including manufacturing, service,
research and development, and training facilities and employs
approximately 29,500 people.

Weatherford reported a net loss attributable to the Company of
$3.39 billion on $5.74 billion of total revenues in 2016, compared
to a net loss attributable to the Company of $1.98 billion on $9.43
billion of total revenues in 2015.  As of Sept. 30, 2017,
Weatherford International had $12.01 billion in total assets,
$10.62 billion in total liabilities and $1.38 billion in total
shareholders' equity.

                         *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Nov. 20, 2017, Fitch Ratings affirmed
Weatherford International plc (Weatherford; NYSE: WFT) and its
subsidiaries' Long-Term Issuer Default Ratings (IDR) and senior
unsecured ratings at 'CCC'.  WFT's 'CCC' rating reflects exposure
to the oilfield services sector and a stressed balance sheet. Fitch
expects an extended down-cycle and delayed recovery from Fitch
initial sector recovery expectations due to low to range-bound oil
and gas prices.


WESTMORELAND COAL: Kevin Paprzycki Resigns as CEO
-------------------------------------------------
Kevin A. Paprzycki stepped down from his role as chief executive
officer of Westmoreland Coal Company effective Nov. 27, 2017,
according to a Form 8-K report filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.  Mr. Paprzycki's departure was not the result
of any disagreement with the Company.

On Nov. 27, 2017 and in connection with Mr. Paprzycki's departure,
the Company's board of directors appointed Michael G. Hutchinson,
61, to serve as interim chief executive officer and interim
president.  Mr. Hutchinson retired from Deloitte & Touche in July
2012 after a career spanning nearly 35 years, leading its Denver
Energy and Natural Resources Practice for the last 15 years while
at the same time managing the Audit and Enterprise Risk Management
practice of the Denver office.  He has been a member of the Board
since 2012 and was chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board up
until his appointment to this role.  Mr. Hutchinson also serves on
the board of directors of ONE Gas, Inc., a publicly traded natural
gas utility, and as its audit committee chairman.

There are no arrangements or understandings between Mr. Hutchinson
and any other person in connection with his appointment as interim
chief executive officer and interim president of the Company.  

The Board also approved Mr. Hutchinson's compensation package for
his interim role, which consisted of a base salary of $900,000, no
grant of equity and a cash bonus target of 40% to 60% of base
salary for meeting strategic goals at the discretion of the Board.

           Adoption of Material Compensatory Plan

On Nov. 29, 2017, the Company's Board approved the 2017 Executive
Severance Plan, as recommended by its Compensation and Benefits
Committee.  The Plan provides severance benefits to eligible
employees of the Company in the event that an eligible employee's
employment is terminated for a reason other than Cause, Disability
or death, or is terminated by the eligible employee for Good Reason
(as such terms are defined in the Plan).

The Company expects to enter into separate agreements under the
Plan with executive officers and other participants.  The new
Individual Agreements will supersede any such prior agreements
between a Participant and the Company regarding severance.
Participants that meet the requirements for a severance award will
be paid between one and two times Base Salary and Reference Bonus
(the average cash bonus of the Participant over the most recent
three calendar years), as well as being eligible for continued
health benefits.  Named executive officers of the Company will
participate at the two times Base Salary and Reference Bonus level.
The Individual Agreements contain customary confidentiality,
non-compete, non-solicit and non-disparagement provisions.

A full-text copy of the 2017 Executive Severance Plan is available
for free at https://is.gd/eeI5nR

                  About Westmoreland Coal Company

Based in Englewood, Colorado, Westmoreland Coal Company --
http://www.westmoreland.com/-- is an independent coal company in
the United States.  Westmoreland's coal operations include surface
coal mines in the United States and Canada, underground coal mines
in Ohio and New Mexico, a char production facility, and a 50%
interest in an activated carbon plant.  Westmoreland also owns the
general partner of and a majority interest in Westmoreland Resource
Partners, LP, a publicly-traded coal master limited partnership
(NYSE:WMLP).

Westmoreland Coal reported a net loss of $28.87 million on $1.47
billion of revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a
net loss of $219.09 million on $1.41 billion of revenues for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of Sept. 30, 2017, Westmoreland Coal
had $1.43 billion in total assets, $2.20 billion in total
liabilities and a total deficit of $774.14 million.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on March 2, 2016, Moody's Investors Service
downgraded the ratings of Westmoreland, including its corporate
family rating to 'Caa1' from 'B3'.  The downgrade reflects Moody's
expectation that the company's leverage metrics and cash flow
generation will continue to be under stress due to the headwinds
facing the coal industry.

In November 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Westmoreland Coal Co. to 'CCC' from 'CCC+'.  The outlook
is negative.  S&P said, "The negative outlook on Westmoreland
reflects our expectation that the company could default or pursue a
distressed exchange or other restructuring in the next 12 months.
We believe that a default could be precipitated by any combination
of a covenant breach or difficulties in refinancing Oxford's term
loan due December 2018.  In our opinion, a restructuring associated
with the Oxford debt could adversely impact Westmoreland's credit
profile as a whole.


WESTMORELAND RESOURCE: Extends GP Services Agreement to April 2018
------------------------------------------------------------------
Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP and Westmoreland Resources GP,
LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, entered into a fourth
amendment to the Services Agreement dated as of Jan. 1, 2015, by
and between the Partnership and General Partner.  The Amendment
modified the term of the Services Agreement to extend the current
term end date from March 31, 2018 to April 30, 2018.  The term of
the Services Agreement automatically renews upon the end of term
for successive 12-month periods unless either party gives written
notice no less than 120 days prior to the end of the current term
of the Services Agreement.

                   About Westmoreland Resource

Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP --
http://www.westmorelandMLP.com-- is a low-cost producer and
marketer of high-value thermal coal to large electric utilities
with coal-fired power plants under long-term coal sales contracts.
The Company also markets to industrial users and is a producer of
surface mined coal in Ohio.  The company focuses on acquiring
thermal coal reserves that it can efficiently mine with its
large-scale equipment and take advantage of close customer
proximity through mine-mouth power plants and strategically located
rail and barge transportation.  Its reserves and operations are
well positioned to serve its primary market areas of the Midwest,
Northeast and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States.  The
company's operations are located in Ohio and Wyoming.  It sold 7.8
million tons of coal in 2016.  Westmoreland Resource is
headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Westmoreland Resource reported a net loss of $31.58 million on
$349.3 million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss of $33.68 million on $384.7 million of total
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  The Company's balance
sheet at Sept. 30, 2017, showed $367.34 million in total assets,
$409.58 million in total liabilities and a total deficit of $42.23
million.


WESTMORELAND RESOURCE: Kevin A. Paprzycki Resigns as CEO
--------------------------------------------------------
Kevin A. Paprzycki stepped down from his role as chief executive
officer of Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP, effective Nov. 27,
2017.  Mr. Paprzycki's departure was not the result of any
disagreement with the Partnership, according to a Form 8-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                   About Westmoreland Resource

Westmoreland Resource Partners, LP --
http://www.westmorelandMLP.com-- is a low-cost producer and
marketer of high-value thermal coal to large electric utilities
with coal-fired power plants under long-term coal sales contracts.
The Company also markets to industrial users and is a producer of
surface mined coal in Ohio.  The company focuses on acquiring
thermal coal reserves that it can efficiently mine with its
large-scale equipment and take advantage of close customer
proximity through mine-mouth power plants and strategically located
rail and barge transportation.  Its reserves and operations are
well positioned to serve its primary market areas of the Midwest,
Northeast and Rocky Mountain regions of the United States.  The
company's operations are located in Ohio and Wyoming.  It sold 7.8
million tons of coal in 2016.  Westmoreland Resource is
headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Westmoreland Resource reported a net loss of $31.58 million on
$349.3 million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss of $33.68 million on $384.7 million of total
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  The Company's balance
sheet at Sept. 30, 2017, showed $367.34 million in total assets,
$409.58 million in total liabilities and a total deficit of $42.23
million.


WESTPAC RESTORATION: Taps BKD LLP as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------
Westpac Restoration, Inc. seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Colorado to hire BKD, LLP as its
accountant.

The firm will provide tax and accounting consultation, including
the preparation of income returns and other documents.

Tad Goodenbour, the accountant who will be providing the services,
will charge $400 per hour.  The hourly rates for the firm's staff
members range from $150 to $250.

Mr. Goodenbour disclosed in a court filing that his firm does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor's estate or
creditors.

BKD can be reached through:

     Tad Goodenbour
     BKD, LLP
     111 S. Tejon Street, Suite 800
     Colorado Springs, CO 80903-2286
     Phone: (719) 471-4290

               About Westpac Restoration, Inc.

Westpac Restoration, Inc. filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D. Colo. Case No. 17-18211) on September 1, 2017.  WestPac
Restorations -- http://www.westpacrestorations.com/-- is a full
service aircraft restoration and maintenance facility, complete
with an FAA approved repair station # ZW8R398Y.

The petition was signed by William R. Klaers, its president and
treasurer.  The Debtor disclosed total assets of $330,491 and total
liabilities of $1.50 million.

The Hon. Elizabeth E. Brown presides over the case. Lindquist &
Vennum, LLP represents the Debtor as counsel.


XFS INVESTMENTS: Hires W. Steven Shumway as Counsel
---------------------------------------------------
XFS Investments, LLC seeks approval from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, to
hire W. Steven Shumway, Esq. as bankruptcy counsel.

Services to be rendered by Mr. Shumway are:

     a) advise and consult with the Debtor concerning questions
arising in the conduct of the administration of the estate, and
concerning the Debtor's rights and remedies with regard to the
estate's assets and the claims of secured, preferred and unsecured
creditors and other parties in interest;

     b) appear for, prosecute, defend and represent the Debtor's
interest in suits arising in or related to this case;

     c) appear for, prosecute, defend and represent the Debtor's
interest in suits existing in California state courts;

     d) investigate and prosecute preference, fraudulent conveyance
and other actions arising under the Trustee's avoiding powers;

     e) assist and advise Applicant in the investigation and
collection for the estate of any outstanding accounts receivable,
deposits or causes of action which may be reasonable obtainable;
and

     f) assist in the preparation of schedules, statements,
pleadings, motions, notices and orders as are required for the
orderly administration of this estate, and to consult with and
advise the Debtor in connection with the operation of the business
of the Debtor.

Mr. Shumway attests that he is a disinterested person within the
meaning of 11 U.S.C. Section 101(14).

Mr. Shumway's normal hourly billing rates for bankruptcy work is
$300 and paralegal charges $70 per hour.

The Counsel can be reached through:

     W. Steven Shumway, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF W. STEVEN SHUMWAY
     3400 Douglas Blvd., Suite 250
     Roseville, CA 95661
     Phone: (916) 789-8821
     Fax: (916) 789-2083
     Email: sshumwav(3shumwavlaw. com

                    About XFS Investments, LLC

Based in Folsom, California, XFS Investments, LLC filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 17-27184) on October 21,
2017.  The petition was signed by David Gruebele, its manager.

Judge Christopher D. Jaime presides over the case.  Steven W.
Shumway, Esq., at the Law Office of W. Steven Shumway, represents
the Debtor as counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $0 to $50,000 in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.


[^] Large Companies with Insolvent Balance Sheet
------------------------------------------------
                                               Total
                                              Share-      Total
                                    Total   Holders'    Working
                                   Assets     Equity    Capital
  Company         Ticker             ($MM)      ($MM)      ($MM)
  -------         ------           ------   --------    -------
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ALSWF US           94.0      (54.4)     (32.8)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  OU1 GR             94.0      (54.4)     (32.8)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT CN             94.0      (54.4)     (32.8)
ABSOLUTE SOFTWRE  ABT2EUR EU         94.0      (54.4)     (32.8)
AGENUS INC        AJ81 GR           149.3      (51.6)      29.9
AGENUS INC        AGEN US           149.3      (51.6)      29.9
AGENUS INC        AJ81 TH           149.3      (51.6)      29.9
AGENUS INC        AGENEUR EU        149.3      (51.6)      29.9
AGENUS INC        AJ81 QT           149.3      (51.6)      29.9
AIMIA INC         AIM CN          4,260.0      (20.8)  (1,176.3)
ALTAIR ENGINEE-A  ALTR US           301.5      (60.2)     (92.4)
ALTAIR ENGINEE-A  8A2 QT            301.5      (60.2)     (92.4)
ALTAIR ENGINEE-A  ALTREUR EU        301.5      (60.2)     (92.4)
ALTAIR ENGINEE-A  8A2 GR            301.5      (60.2)     (92.4)
ALTAIR ENGINEE-A  8A2 TH            301.5      (60.2)     (92.4)
AMER RESTAUR-LP   ICTPU US           33.5       (4.0)      (6.2)
AMYRIS INC        AMRS US           138.6     (190.4)      (5.7)
ARSANIS INC       ASNS US             7.6      (16.7)      (6.3)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPN US           202.7     (267.5)    (327.7)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AST GR            202.7     (267.5)    (327.7)
ASPEN TECHNOLOGY  AZPNEUR EU        202.7     (267.5)    (327.7)
ATLATSA RESOURCE  ATL SJ            193.5     (142.5)     (46.4)
AUTOZONE INC      AZO US          9,259.8   (1,428.4)    (155.0)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 TH          9,259.8   (1,428.4)    (155.0)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 GR          9,259.8   (1,428.4)    (155.0)
AUTOZONE INC      AZOEUR EU       9,259.8   (1,428.4)    (155.0)
AUTOZONE INC      AZ5 QT          9,259.8   (1,428.4)    (155.0)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVID US           225.3     (270.4)     (78.0)
AVID TECHNOLOGY   AVD GR            225.3     (270.4)     (78.0)
AXIM BIOTECHNOLO  AXIM US             3.3       (4.9)      (3.5)
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BNFT US           171.2      (37.0)       7.0
BENEFITFOCUS INC  BTF GR            171.2      (37.0)       7.0
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  BHVN US           184.7      156.2      157.4
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  2VN GR            184.7      156.2      157.4
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  BHVNEUR EU        184.7      156.2      157.4
BIOHAVEN PHARMAC  2VN TH            184.7      156.2      157.4
BLUE BIRD CORP    BLBD US           366.8      (59.6)      32.8
BLUE RIDGE MOUNT  BRMR US         1,060.2     (212.5)     (62.4)
BOMBARDIER INC-A  BBD/A CN       23,709.0   (3,623.0)     103.0
BOMBARDIER INC-B  BBD/B CN       23,709.0   (3,623.0)     103.0
BRINKER INTL      EAT US          1,368.6     (539.0)    (273.5)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ GR          1,368.6     (539.0)    (273.5)
BRINKER INTL      BKJ QT          1,368.6     (539.0)    (273.5)
BRINKER INTL      EAT2EUR EU      1,368.6     (539.0)    (273.5)
BROOKFIELD REAL   BRE CN             95.0      (31.1)       3.0
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  DOO CN          2,575.8      (98.6)      91.1
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  B15A GR         2,575.8      (98.6)      91.1
BRP INC/CA-SUB V  BRPIF US        2,575.8      (98.6)      91.1
BUFFALO COAL COR  BUC SJ             49.8      (22.9)     (20.1)
BURLINGTON STORE  BURL US         2,843.4     (110.5)      22.8
BURLINGTON STORE  BUI GR          2,843.4     (110.5)      22.8
BURLINGTON STORE  BURL* MM        2,843.4     (110.5)      22.8
CADIZ INC         CDZI US            68.9      (76.3)       7.6
CADIZ INC         2ZC GR             68.9      (76.3)       7.6
CAESARS ENTERTAI  CZR US         14,353.0   (3,815.0)  (5,099.0)
CAESARS ENTERTAI  C08 GR         14,353.0   (3,815.0)  (5,099.0)
CAESARS ENTERTAI  CZREUR EU      14,353.0   (3,815.0)  (5,099.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  CRC US          6,183.0     (574.0)    (294.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  1CLB GR         6,183.0     (574.0)    (294.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  CRCEUR EU       6,183.0     (574.0)    (294.0)
CALIFORNIA RESOU  1CL TH          6,183.0     (574.0)    (294.0)
CAMBIUM LEARNING  ABCD US           155.0      (45.0)     (55.0)
CAREDX INC        CDNA US            75.1       (0.2)     (14.0)
CAREDX INC        1K9 GR             75.1       (0.2)     (14.0)
CAREDX INC        CDNAEUR EU         75.1       (0.2)     (14.0)
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 GR            592.4      (60.5)      (1.4)
CASELLA WASTE     CWST US           592.4      (60.5)      (1.4)
CASELLA WASTE     WA3 TH            592.4      (60.5)      (1.4)
CASELLA WASTE     CWSTEUR EU        592.4      (60.5)      (1.4)
CHENIERE EN PART  CQH US              0.8       (0.1)      (0.1)
CHENIERE EN PART  CE4 GR              0.8       (0.1)      (0.1)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK US         11,981.0     (704.0)  (1,040.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 GR         11,981.0     (704.0)  (1,040.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 TH         11,981.0     (704.0)  (1,040.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHK* MM        11,981.0     (704.0)  (1,040.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CS1 QT         11,981.0     (704.0)  (1,040.0)
CHESAPEAKE ENERG  CHKEUR EU      11,981.0     (704.0)  (1,040.0)
CHOICE HOTELS     CZH GR            961.2     (200.4)     182.3
CHOICE HOTELS     CHH US            961.2     (200.4)     182.3
CINCINNATI BELL   CBB US          1,457.3     (133.5)       5.1
CINCINNATI BELL   CIB1 GR         1,457.3     (133.5)       5.1
CINCINNATI BELL   CBBEUR EU       1,457.3     (133.5)       5.1
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   C7C GR          5,580.5   (1,284.2)     337.6
CLEAR CHANNEL-A   CCO US          5,580.5   (1,284.2)     337.6
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA GR          1,923.3     (833.1)     373.6
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA TH          1,923.3     (833.1)     373.6
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF US          1,923.3     (833.1)     373.6
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF* MM         1,923.3     (833.1)     373.6
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CVA QT          1,923.3     (833.1)     373.6
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS  CLF2EUR EU      1,923.3     (833.1)     373.6
COGENT COMMUNICA  CCOI US           729.9      (80.1)     236.8
COGENT COMMUNICA  OGM1 GR           729.9      (80.1)     236.8
CONSUMER CAPITAL  CCGN US             5.2       (2.5)      (2.6)
DELEK LOGISTICS   DKL US            422.9      (25.8)       5.5
DELEK LOGISTICS   D6L GR            422.9      (25.8)       5.5
DENNY'S CORP      DE8 GR            309.2      (97.6)     (45.4)
DENNY'S CORP      DENN US           309.2      (97.6)     (45.4)
DINEEQUITY INC    DIN US          1,641.2     (216.7)      79.9
DINEEQUITY INC    IHP GR          1,641.2     (216.7)      79.9
DOLLARAMA INC     DOL CN          1,891.4      (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DLMAF US        1,891.4      (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 GR          1,891.4      (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DOLEUR EU       1,891.4      (59.4)     291.2
DOLLARAMA INC     DR3 TH          1,891.4      (59.4)     291.2
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV TH            816.2   (2,765.3)     194.1
DOMINO'S PIZZA    EZV GR            816.2   (2,765.3)     194.1
DOMINO'S PIZZA    DPZ US            816.2   (2,765.3)     194.1
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 GR          2,301.0     (857.3)     (71.7)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DB5 TH          2,301.0     (857.3)     (71.7)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB US          2,301.0     (857.3)     (71.7)
DUN & BRADSTREET  DNB1EUR EU      2,301.0     (857.3)     (71.7)
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB GR          3,139.3     (174.1)     157.8
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKN US         3,139.3     (174.1)     157.8
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  2DB TH          3,139.3     (174.1)     157.8
DUNKIN' BRANDS G  DNKNEUR EU      3,139.3     (174.1)     157.8
ERIN ENERGY CORP  ERN SJ            229.5     (359.3)    (310.8)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRI US         1,425.6     (123.8)      (5.1)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C TH          1,425.6     (123.8)      (5.1)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  G2C GR          1,425.6     (123.8)      (5.1)
EVERI HOLDINGS I  EVRIEUR EU      1,425.6     (123.8)      (5.1)
FERRELLGAS-LP     FEG GR          1,610.0     (757.5)     (43.8)
FERRELLGAS-LP     FGP US          1,610.0     (757.5)     (43.8)
FIFTH STREET ASS  FSAM US           141.6      (33.5)       -
FIFTH STREET ASS  7FS TH            141.6      (33.5)       -
FORESCOUT TECHNO  FSCT US           140.7      (63.1)     (20.4)
FORESCOUT TECHNO  F1O GR            140.7      (63.1)     (20.4)
FORESCOUT TECHNO  F1O QT            140.7      (63.1)     (20.4)
FORESCOUT TECHNO  FSCTEUR EU        140.7      (63.1)     (20.4)
GAMCO INVESTO-A   GBL US            231.0     (104.5)       -
GEN COMM-A        GC1 GR          2,063.3       (2.7)      45.3
GEN COMM-A        GNCMA US        2,063.3       (2.7)      45.3
GEN COMM-A        GNCMAEUR EU     2,063.3       (2.7)      45.3
GEN COMM-B        GNCMB US        2,063.3       (2.7)      45.3
GNC HOLDINGS INC  IGN GR          1,969.0      (24.7)     441.6
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC US          1,969.0      (24.7)     441.6
GNC HOLDINGS INC  IGN TH          1,969.0      (24.7)     441.6
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC1EUR EU      1,969.0      (24.7)     441.6
GNC HOLDINGS INC  GNC* MM         1,969.0      (24.7)     441.6
GOGO INC          GOGO US         1,362.9     (155.5)     322.8
GOGO INC          G0G GR          1,362.9     (155.5)     322.8
GREEN PLAINS PAR  GPP US             92.8      (64.3)       5.0
GREEN PLAINS PAR  8GP GR             92.8      (64.3)       5.0
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB US          2,132.2     (214.3)     271.4
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB GR          2,132.2     (214.3)     271.4
H&R BLOCK INC     HRB TH          2,132.2     (214.3)     271.4
H&R BLOCK INC     HRBEUR EU       2,132.2     (214.3)     271.4
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH GR         35,731.0   (5,066.0)   3,837.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCA US         35,731.0   (5,066.0)   3,837.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH TH         35,731.0   (5,066.0)   3,837.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  2BH QT         35,731.0   (5,066.0)   3,837.0
HCA HEALTHCARE I  HCAEUR EU      35,731.0   (5,066.0)   3,837.0
HELIOS & MATHESO  QCLN QT            17.5      (24.1)     (33.9)
HORTONWORKS INC   HDP US            211.4      (51.1)     (31.0)
HORTONWORKS INC   14K GR            211.4      (51.1)     (31.0)
HORTONWORKS INC   14K QT            211.4      (51.1)     (31.0)
HORTONWORKS INC   HDPEUR EU         211.4      (51.1)     (31.0)
HP COMPANY-BDR    HPQB34 BZ      32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQ* MM        32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQ US         32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            7HP TH         32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            7HP GR         32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQ TE         32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQ CI         32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQ SW         32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HWP QT         32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQCHF EU      32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD EU      32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQUSD SW      32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
HP INC            HPQEUR EU      32,913.0   (3,408.0)     (94.0)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX US         1,669.3      (48.4)     (53.8)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 GR          1,669.3      (48.4)     (53.8)
IDEXX LABS        IX1 TH          1,669.3      (48.4)     (53.8)
IDEXX LABS        IDXX AV         1,669.3      (48.4)     (53.8)
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU GR            225.7     (111.3)     133.3
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMGN US           225.7     (111.3)     133.3
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU TH            225.7     (111.3)     133.3
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMU QT            225.7     (111.3)     133.3
IMMUNOGEN INC     IMGNEUR EU        225.7     (111.3)     133.3
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IMMU US           153.4      (67.4)     (52.0)
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IM3 GR            153.4      (67.4)     (52.0)
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IM3 TH            153.4      (67.4)     (52.0)
IMMUNOMEDICS INC  IM3 QT            153.4      (67.4)     (52.0)
INNOVIVA INC      INVA US           391.0     (223.0)     187.6
INNOVIVA INC      HVE GR            391.0     (223.0)     187.6
INNOVIVA INC      INVAEUR EU        391.0     (223.0)     187.6
INSPIRED ENTERTA  INSE US           213.4       (2.1)      (1.4)
INSTRUCTURE INC   INST US           135.5      (10.9)     (24.0)
INSTRUCTURE INC   1IN GR            135.5      (10.9)     (24.0)
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  I76 GR            625.1      (17.6)     249.6
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWD US           625.1      (17.6)     249.6
IRONWOOD PHARMAC  IRWDEUR EU        625.1      (17.6)     249.6
JACK IN THE BOX   JBX GR          1,228.4     (388.0)    (122.7)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK US         1,228.4     (388.0)    (122.7)
JACK IN THE BOX   JACK1EUR EU     1,228.4     (388.0)    (122.7)
JUST ENERGY GROU  JE US           1,276.8     (268.4)    (183.6)
JUST ENERGY GROU  1JE GR          1,276.8     (268.4)    (183.6)
JUST ENERGY GROU  JE CN           1,276.8     (268.4)    (183.6)
L BRANDS INC      LTD GR          7,816.0   (1,119.0)     911.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD TH          7,816.0   (1,119.0)     911.0
L BRANDS INC      LB US           7,816.0   (1,119.0)     911.0
L BRANDS INC      LBEUR EU        7,816.0   (1,119.0)     911.0
L BRANDS INC      LB* MM          7,816.0   (1,119.0)     911.0
L BRANDS INC      LTD QT          7,816.0   (1,119.0)     911.0
LAMB WESTON       LW US           2,527.8     (521.6)     321.5
LAMB WESTON       0L5 GR          2,527.8     (521.6)     321.5
LAMB WESTON       LW-WEUR EU      2,527.8     (521.6)     321.5
LAMB WESTON       0L5 TH          2,527.8     (521.6)     321.5
LAMB WESTON       0L5 QT          2,527.8     (521.6)     321.5
LANTHEUS HOLDING  LNTH US           281.0      (77.9)      90.5
LANTHEUS HOLDING  0L8 GR            281.0      (77.9)      90.5
MANNKIND CORP     MNKD US            56.5     (251.0)     (62.8)
MCDONALDS - BDR   MCDC34 BZ      32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO TH         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD TE         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO GR         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD* MM        32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD US         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD SW         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD CI         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MDO QT         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDCHF EU      32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD EU      32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDUSD SW      32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCDEUR EU      32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS CORP    MCD AV         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MCDONALDS-CEDEAR  MCD AR         32,559.6   (3,477.6)   1,050.1
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCA US         1,617.8     (328.8)    (220.3)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MD7A GR         1,617.8     (328.8)    (220.3)
MDC PARTNERS-A    MDCAEUR EU      1,617.8     (328.8)    (220.3)
MEDLEY MANAGE-A   MDLY US           135.5      (11.6)      35.7
MICHAELS COS INC  MIK US          2,306.1   (1,732.8)     482.5
MICHAELS COS INC  MIM GR          2,306.1   (1,732.8)     482.5
MIRAGEN THERAPEU  MGEN US            47.1       39.0       39.9
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGI US          4,546.1     (184.0)     (66.1)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N GR         4,546.1     (184.0)     (66.1)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  9M1N TH         4,546.1     (184.0)     (66.1)
MONEYGRAM INTERN  MGIEUR EU       4,546.1     (184.0)     (66.1)
MOODY'S CORP      DUT GR          8,304.9     (156.8)     296.2
MOODY'S CORP      MCO US          8,304.9     (156.8)     296.2
MOODY'S CORP      DUT TH          8,304.9     (156.8)     296.2
MOODY'S CORP      MCOEUR EU       8,304.9     (156.8)     296.2
MOODY'S CORP      DUT QT          8,304.9     (156.8)     296.2
MOSAIC ACQUISITI  MOSC/U US           0.6       (0.0)      (0.0)
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA GR         8,618.0     (818.0)     773.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MTLA TH         8,618.0     (818.0)     773.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI US          8,618.0     (818.0)     773.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MOT TE          8,618.0     (818.0)     773.0
MOTOROLA SOLUTIO  MSI1EUR EU      8,618.0     (818.0)     773.0
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGN US           819.5     (902.7)     193.1
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 GR            819.5     (902.7)     193.1
MSG NETWORKS- A   1M4 TH            819.5     (902.7)     193.1
MSG NETWORKS- A   MSGNEUR EU        819.5     (902.7)     193.1
NATHANS FAMOUS    NATH US            84.5      (60.4)      63.8
NATHANS FAMOUS    NFA GR             84.5      (60.4)      63.8
NATIONAL CINEMED  XWM GR          1,153.4      (61.9)      70.0
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMI US         1,153.4      (61.9)      70.0
NATIONAL CINEMED  NCMIEUR EU      1,153.4      (61.9)      70.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR GR          6,080.0   (4,923.0)     767.0
NAVISTAR INTL     NAV US          6,080.0   (4,923.0)     767.0
NAVISTAR INTL     IHR TH          6,080.0   (4,923.0)     767.0
NEW ENG RLTY-LP   NEN US            237.8      (32.4)       -
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYMX US             1.3       (0.7)      (0.7)
NYMOX PHARMACEUT  NYM GR              1.3       (0.7)      (0.7)
ONCOMED PHARMACE  OMED US           120.5      (62.2)      82.0
ONCOMED PHARMACE  O0M GR            120.5      (62.2)      82.0
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PZZA US           550.9      (39.4)      29.5
PAPA JOHN'S INTL  PP1 GR            550.9      (39.4)      29.5
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1EUR EU      41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI SW         41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1 TE         41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 TH         41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM1CHF EU      41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 GR         41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM US          41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PM FP          41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI1 IX        41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  PMI EB         41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PHILIP MORRIS IN  4I1 QT         41,951.0   (9,633.0)   2,345.0
PINNACLE ENTERTA  PNK US          3,926.3     (343.8)     (90.2)
PINNACLE ENTERTA  65P GR          3,926.3     (343.8)     (90.2)
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT US         1,366.0     (139.6)      49.0
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL TH          1,366.0     (139.6)      49.0
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL GR          1,366.0     (139.6)      49.0
PLANET FITNESS-A  3PL QT          1,366.0     (139.6)      49.0
PLANET FITNESS-A  PLNT1EUR EU     1,366.0     (139.6)      49.0
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PH2 GR            292.6      (35.4)     105.8
PROS HOLDINGS IN  PRO US            292.6      (35.4)     105.8
QUANTUM CORP      QNT2 GR           211.2     (124.3)     (48.3)
QUANTUM CORP      QTM US            211.2     (124.3)     (48.3)
QUANTUM CORP      QTM1EUR EU        211.2     (124.3)     (48.3)
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETA US           160.4     (132.4)     108.2
REATA PHARMACE-A  2R3 GR            160.4     (132.4)     108.2
REATA PHARMACE-A  RETAEUR EU        160.4     (132.4)     108.2
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGC US          2,672.2     (855.2)     (59.1)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RETA GR         2,672.2     (855.2)     (59.1)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGC* MM         2,672.2     (855.2)     (59.1)
REGAL ENTERTAI-A  RGCEUR EU       2,672.2     (855.2)     (59.1)
REMARK HOLD INC   3SWN GR           109.7       (9.4)     (58.2)
REMARK HOLD INC   MARK US           109.7       (9.4)     (58.2)
REMARK HOLD INC   MARKEUR EU        109.7       (9.4)     (58.2)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   R21 GR            792.3      (73.8)    (109.3)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   REN US            792.3      (73.8)    (109.3)
RESOLUTE ENERGY   RENEUR EU         792.3      (73.8)    (109.3)
RESTORATION ROBO  HAIR US            16.0      (14.0)      (7.5)
RESTORATION ROBO  0RR TH             16.0      (14.0)      (7.5)
RESTORATION ROBO  HAIREUR EU         16.0      (14.0)      (7.5)
REVLON INC-A      REV US          3,167.8     (701.9)     241.5
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 GR         3,167.8     (701.9)     241.5
REVLON INC-A      RVL1 TH         3,167.8     (701.9)     241.5
REVLON INC-A      REVEUR EU       3,167.8     (701.9)     241.5
RH                RH US           1,819.4      (46.8)     246.4
RH                RS1 GR          1,819.4      (46.8)     246.4
RH                RH* MM          1,819.4      (46.8)     246.4
RH                RHEUR EU        1,819.4      (46.8)     246.4
ROKU INC          ROKU US           225.5      (42.8)      52.0
ROKU INC          R35 GR            225.5      (42.8)      52.0
ROKU INC          R35 QT            225.5      (42.8)      52.0
ROKU INC          ROKUEUR EU        225.5      (42.8)      52.0
ROKU INC          R35 TH            225.5      (42.8)      52.0
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST US            196.8       (1.4)     (58.1)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 GR            196.8       (1.4)     (58.1)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RS8 TH            196.8       (1.4)     (58.1)
ROSETTA STONE IN  RST1EUR EU        196.8       (1.4)     (58.1)
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN GR         3,956.7     (163.0)     740.3
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRD US          3,956.7     (163.0)     740.3
RR DONNELLEY & S  DLLN TH         3,956.7     (163.0)     740.3
RR DONNELLEY & S  RRDEUR EU       3,956.7     (163.0)     740.3
RYERSON HOLDING   RYI US          1,817.3      (14.4)     731.7
RYERSON HOLDING   7RY GR          1,817.3      (14.4)     731.7
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  SBH US          2,123.1     (363.6)     595.9
SALLY BEAUTY HOL  S7V GR          2,123.1     (363.6)     595.9
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SN US           2,240.1      (90.4)     (43.2)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SN* MM          2,240.1      (90.4)     (43.2)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  13S GR          2,240.1      (90.4)     (43.2)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  13S TH          2,240.1      (90.4)     (43.2)
SANCHEZ ENERGY C  SNEUR EU        2,240.1      (90.4)     (43.2)
SAUDI AMERICAN H  SAHN US             0.0       (2.6)      (2.6)
SBA COMM CORP     4SB GR          7,300.5   (2,257.8)    (698.6)
SBA COMM CORP     SBAC US         7,300.5   (2,257.8)    (698.6)
SBA COMM CORP     SBJ TH          7,300.5   (2,257.8)    (698.6)
SBA COMM CORP     SBACEUR EU      7,300.5   (2,257.8)    (698.6)
SCIENTIFIC GAM-A  TJW GR          7,062.4   (1,976.5)     554.8
SCIENTIFIC GAM-A  SGMS US         7,062.4   (1,976.5)     554.8
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE GR          8,193.0   (4,007.0)  (1,112.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE TH          8,193.0   (4,007.0)  (1,112.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SHLD US         8,193.0   (4,007.0)  (1,112.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SEE QT          8,193.0   (4,007.0)  (1,112.0)
SEARS HOLDINGS    SHLDEUR EU      8,193.0   (4,007.0)  (1,112.0)
SIGA TECH INC     SIGA US           148.7     (312.8)      27.9
SILVER SPRING NE  SSNI US           316.5      (39.0)     (14.9)
SILVER SPRING NE  9SI GR            316.5      (39.0)     (14.9)
SILVER SPRING NE  9SI TH            316.5      (39.0)     (14.9)
SILVER SPRING NE  SSNIEUR EU        316.5      (39.0)     (14.9)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI US         8,652.4   (1,050.1)  (2,186.3)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO TH          8,652.4   (1,050.1)  (2,186.3)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  RDO GR          8,652.4   (1,050.1)  (2,186.3)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRIEUR EU      8,652.4   (1,050.1)  (2,186.3)
SIRIUS XM HOLDIN  SIRI AV         8,652.4   (1,050.1)  (2,186.3)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIX US          2,528.3      (67.7)     (70.3)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  6FE GR          2,528.3      (67.7)     (70.3)
SIX FLAGS ENTERT  SIXEUR EU       2,528.3      (67.7)     (70.3)
SOLARWINDOW TECH  WNDW US             0.8       (3.6)       0.5
SONIC CORP        SONC US           561.7     (201.8)      30.6
SONIC CORP        SO4 GR            561.7     (201.8)      30.6
SONIC CORP        SONCEUR EU        561.7     (201.8)      30.6
SONIC CORP        SO4 TH            561.7     (201.8)      30.6
STRAIGHT PATH-B   STRP US            11.9      (17.5)     (11.8)
STRAIGHT PATH-B   5I0 GR             11.9      (17.5)     (11.8)
SYNTEL INC        SYNT US           461.0      (63.6)     142.3
SYNTEL INC        SYE GR            461.0      (63.6)     142.3
SYNTEL INC        SYE TH            461.0      (63.6)     142.3
SYNTEL INC        SYNT1EUR EU       461.0      (63.6)     142.3
SYNTEL INC        SYNT* MM          461.0      (63.6)     142.3
TAILORED BRANDS   TLRD US         2,079.7      (46.7)     753.0
TAILORED BRANDS   WRMA GR         2,079.7      (46.7)     753.0
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TU8 GR          4,108.0     (148.8)       -
TAUBMAN CENTERS   TCO US          4,108.0     (148.8)       -
TINTRI INC        TNTR US           123.7      (48.5)      23.8
TOWN SPORTS INTE  CLUB US           230.9      (99.7)      (4.1)
TRANSDIGM GROUP   T7D GR          9,975.7   (2,951.2)   1,262.6
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG US          9,975.7   (2,951.2)   1,262.6
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDG SW          9,975.7   (2,951.2)   1,262.6
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGCHF EU       9,975.7   (2,951.2)   1,262.6
TRANSDIGM GROUP   TDGEUR EU       9,975.7   (2,951.2)   1,262.6
ULTRA PETROLEUM   UPL US          1,862.1   (1,257.8)    (157.3)
ULTRA PETROLEUM   UPL1EUR EU      1,862.1   (1,257.8)    (157.3)
ULTRA PETROLEUM   UPM1 GR         1,862.1   (1,257.8)    (157.3)
UNISYS CORP       UISCHF EU       2,296.9   (1,649.9)     340.6
UNISYS CORP       UISEUR EU       2,296.9   (1,649.9)     340.6
UNISYS CORP       UIS US          2,296.9   (1,649.9)     340.6
UNISYS CORP       UIS1 SW         2,296.9   (1,649.9)     340.6
UNISYS CORP       USY1 TH         2,296.9   (1,649.9)     340.6
UNISYS CORP       USY1 GR         2,296.9   (1,649.9)     340.6
UNITI GROUP INC   UNIT US         4,292.2   (1,052.9)       -
UNITI GROUP INC   8XC GR          4,292.2   (1,052.9)       -
VALVOLINE INC     VVV US          1,915.0     (117.0)     312.0
VALVOLINE INC     0V4 GR          1,915.0     (117.0)     312.0
VALVOLINE INC     VVVEUR EU       1,915.0     (117.0)     312.0
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR GR          1,409.9     (318.2)     431.7
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR US          1,409.9     (318.2)     431.7
VECTOR GROUP LTD  VGR QT          1,409.9     (318.2)     431.7
VERISIGN INC      VRS TH          2,908.4   (1,229.9)     870.5
VERISIGN INC      VRS GR          2,908.4   (1,229.9)     870.5
VERISIGN INC      VRSN US         2,908.4   (1,229.9)     870.5
VERISIGN INC      VRSNEUR EU      2,908.4   (1,229.9)     870.5
VIEWRAY INC       VRAY US            88.1      (26.6)      27.9
VIEWRAY INC       6L9 GR             88.1      (26.6)      27.9
VIEWRAY INC       VRAYEUR EU         88.1      (26.6)      27.9
W&T OFFSHORE INC  WTI US            887.4     (597.3)      34.5
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTW US          1,315.5   (1,080.7)     (12.7)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 GR          1,315.5   (1,080.7)     (12.7)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 TH          1,315.5   (1,080.7)     (12.7)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WTWEUR EU       1,315.5   (1,080.7)     (12.7)
WEIGHT WATCHERS   WW6 QT          1,315.5   (1,080.7)     (12.7)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW US          3,038.4     (291.2)     (28.9)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WU5 GR          3,038.4     (291.2)     (28.9)
WIDEOPENWEST INC  WOW1EUR EU      3,038.4     (291.2)     (28.9)
WINGSTOP INC      WING US           121.1      (57.7)      (2.1)
WINGSTOP INC      EWG GR            121.1      (57.7)      (2.1)
WINMARK CORP      WINA US            47.2      (39.4)      12.5
WINMARK CORP      GBZ GR             47.2      (39.4)      12.5
WORKIVA INC       WK US             155.6      (14.5)     (12.1)
WORKIVA INC       0WKA GR           155.6      (14.5)     (12.1)
WORKIVA INC       WKEUR EU          155.6      (14.5)     (12.1)
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCW US         1,701.6     (403.7)     226.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 GR         1,701.6     (403.7)     226.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YEL1 TH         1,701.6     (403.7)     226.5
YRC WORLDWIDE IN  YRCWEUR EU      1,701.6     (403.7)     226.5
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM US          5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR GR          5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR TH          5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMEUR EU       5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   TGR QT          5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMCHF EU       5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUM SW          5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD SW       5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0
YUM! BRANDS INC   YUMUSD EU       5,454.0   (6,121.0)     596.0


                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2017.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***